Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000-04-04_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL APRIL 4, 2000 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Commissioner, Council Member or citizen so requests it. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the Agenda. I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA - Regular Meeting of March 21, 2000 II. AWARD OF BID - 501h & France Ramp Improvements Rollcall III. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS -as per pre -list dated 3/29/2000, TOTAL: $28,383..07, IV. ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Minutes of March 21, 2000 II. PUBLIC HEARINGS ON VACATIONS OF STREET OR UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENTS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Engineer. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. If Council wishes to proceed, action by Resolution 3/5 favorable rollcall of Council Members required to pass. Rollcall A. VACATION OF EASEMENTS AND STREET - BRAEWOOD PARK PLAT III. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS - Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Planner Public Comment heard. Motion to close hearing. ZonLm Ordinances: First and Second Reading require 4/5 favorable rollcall of all members of Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall of all members of Council to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. Conditional Use Permit: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. Rollcall A. DECISION FOR NEED OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT - Fairview Southdale Hospital, 6401 France Avenue South, Building Expansion And Parking Ramp Construction Rollcall B FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN Fairview Southdale Hospital, 6401 France Avenue South, Building Expansion And Parking Ramp Rollcall C. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PARKING STRUCTURE 6400 FRANCE AVENUE Fairview Southdale Hospital, 6401 France Avenue South, D. SET HEARING DATE (4/18/00): 1. Final Rezoning & Final Plat - Frauenshuh Companies, 7101 West 78,11 Street 2. Preliminary Rezoning and Overall Development Plan - Opus/Clark - Grandview Square 3. Preliminary Plat Approval - Olinger Ridge, 5804 Olinger Road 4. Final Development Plan Approval - K. E. Peters Billiard Supply, Inc., 7685 Parklawn Avenue 5. Final Development Plan Approval - Eberhardt Properties, Inc. - 3250 West 661h Street and 6550 York Avenue South E. LOT DIVISION Carl Hansen, 5000 and 5004 Kelsey Terrace Rollcall Agenda /Edina City Council April 4, 2000 Page 2 IV. PUBLIC HEARING - TRANSFER OF CONTROL, TIME WARNER CABLE V. AWARD OF BID A. Wooddale Park Comfort Station B. Fourth of July Fireworks C. Water Meters VI. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS A. AMM - NOMINATIONS SOLICITED FOR BOARD OF DIRECTORS VACANCIES B. BLANKET RIGHT -OF -WAY PERMIT AND FACILITY USE AGREEMENT - METRICOM, INC. C. ELECTION EQUIPMENT AGREEMENT WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY D. AUTHORIZE PHASE II SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS E. AUTHORIZE COUNTRY CLUB STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS F. AUTHORIZE BRAEMAR TRUNK HIGHWAY 169 FRONTAGE ROAD IMPROVEMENT G. SET PUBLIC HEARING DATE: FOR STREET RE BILITATION PRO CT IMPROVEMENT A -189 - SCHOOL ROAD, RUTH DRIVE, & W. DST. (5/2/00) �7 _ H. RESOLUTION AMENDING SOUTHWEST MUTUAL AID ASSOCIATION I. 2000 -2001 AGREEMENT LOCAL 49er's (PUBLIC WORKS) J. AUTHORIZE 39390M DAKOTA TRAIL SEWER LIFT STATION RENOVATION VII. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS VIII. CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS IX. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES X. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL XI. MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEM XIL FINANCE A. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS As Per Pre -List Dated 3/29/2000 TOTAL: $710,918.88 and for Confirmation of Payment of Claims as Per Pre -List Dated 3/29/00 TOTAL: $844,882.40 SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS, Mon Apr 10 Board of Review 5:00 P.M. Tues Apr 18 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Tues Apr 25 Volunteer Recognition Reception 5:00 P.M. Sat Apr 29 EDINA FOUNDATION GALA Tues May 2 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Tues May 16 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Mon May 29 MEMORIAL DAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed Tues Jun 6 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Tues Jun 20 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Tues Jul 4 INDEPENDENCE DAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed Wed Jul 5 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Tues Jul 18 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS EDINBOROUGH PARK RADISSON SOUTH COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBEF COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY HELD AT CITY HALL MARCH 21, 2000 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Faust, Hovland, Johnson, and Vice Chair Kelly. CONSENT AGENDA APPROVED Motion made by seconded by Commissioner Faust approving Redevelopment Authority Agenda as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly Motion carried. Commissioner Johnson and the Edina Housing and *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FOR MARCH 6 2000 APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Johnson and seconded by Commissioner Faust approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Edina Housing and . Redevelopment Authority for March 6, 2000. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. CLAIMS PAID Motion made by Commissioner Register dated March 15, 2000, and consisting of Commissioner Johnson seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly Motion carried. Faust approving the Check one page totaling $10,189.63. There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, Vice Chair Kelly declared the meeting adjourned at 7:04 P.M. Executive Director S E y REQUEST FOR PURCHA TO: Edina Housing & Redevelopment Authority FROM: Francis Hoffman, City Engineer VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: April 4, 2000 ITEM DESCRIPTION: Ramp Facility Expansion & Restoration - Company 1. Knutson Construction Services 2. L.S. Black Constructors, Inc. 3. Sheehy Construction Company 4. Adolfson & Peterson, Inc. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Knutson Construction Services GENERAL INFORMATION: AGENDA ITEM HRA II. & France Ramps Amount of Quote or Bid 1. See Tabulation on 2. Reverse Side 3. 4. 5. P -40 No. Ramp - $1,840,000.00 P -1 c So. Ramp Waste Mgmt. - $ 42,000.00 P -21 Ramp Restoration - $ 325,000.00 This bid is for general 50th & France Ramp Improvements /Restoration. The project is bid in three parts. The first portion is the north ramp expansion, the second portion is an enhanced waste management expansion in the south ramp and the third portion is general structural renovation in the existing ramps. The funding for the projects is HRA and special assessment. The restoration portion of the contract needs to be reduced to a not to exceed expenditure to match available funding. The City and HRA reserve the right to accept all or any portion of a bid per our specifications. Signatufe The Recommended Bid is within budget not within budg Gordon Hughes, Public Works - 50th & France Department WaNn, Finance Director ger CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CONTRACT 00 -1 (HRA) 49 % STREET PARKING RAMP IMPROVEMENT - IMP. # P-4a 50" & FRANCE (SOUTH RAMP) WASTE MANAGEMENT IMPROVEMENT - IMP. # P -1c & (50th & FRANCE AREA) EDINA PARKING RAMP RESTORATION - IMP. # P -21 BID OPENING 3/30/00 - 11:00 AM *Incomplete bid - unable to verify unit prices. TOTAL P -1 c TOTAL P-4a - TOTAL P -1 c - TOTAL P -21 - ALT. 1 - PLANHOLDER W. 49 % ST. 50TH & FRANCE (50TH & FRANCE 501H & FRANCE PARKING RAMP (S. RAMP) AREA) (S. RAMP) WASTE IMPROVEMENTS WASTE MGMT. EDINA PKG. MGMT. IMP. IMPROVEMENT FACILITIES START 6/5/00, RESTORATION COMPLETION 7/20/00 Knutson Construction Services $1,840,000.00 $42,000.00 $444,932.50 $49,000.00 L.S. Black Constructors, Inc. $1,933,000.00 $57,000.00 "$490,510.00 $57,000.00 Sheehy Construction Company $2,051,159.00 $48,016.00 $468,398.25 $44,016.00 Adolfson & Peterson, Inc. $2,298,059.85 $61,785.00 $497,846.15 $51,785.00 Engineer's Estimate $1,850,000 $40,000 $565,000 $40,000 *Incomplete bid - unable to verify unit prices. COUNCIL CHECK — LISTER 29 -MAR -2000 (14 _) page 1 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 13533 04/04/00 $8,323.32 BRW INC. ARCHITECT FEES 267 -0850 CENTENNIAL LAK PRO FEE ARCH /E < *> $8,323.32* 13534 04/04/00 $2,111.12 Curtis 1000 PERMIT STICKERS 31034001 50TH STREET MISC 549 < *> $2,111.12* 13535 04/04/00 $437.25 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP LEGAL FEES 762823 CENTENNIAL LAK PRO FEES LEG /S 04/04/00 $4,507.50 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP LEGAL FEES 762823 GRANDVIEW PRO FEES LEG /S < *> $4,944.75* 13536 04/04/00 $3.50 Fischer, Barb HRA PARKING PERMIT RE 032100 SOTH STREET PARKING PERMIT < *> $3.50* 13537 04/04/00 $35.26 Walker Parking Consultan RECYCLING /TRASH AREA 210991 50TH STREET PRO FEE ARCH /E 04/04/00 $3,665.12 Walker Parking Consultan RAMP RESTORATION 210992 50TH STREET PRO FEE ARCH /E 04/04/00 $9,300.00 Walker Parking Consultan RAMP RESTORATION 211000 50TH STREET PRO FEE ARCH /E < *> $13,000.38* $28,383.07* COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY 29 -MAR -2000 (14:54) page 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ FUND # 01 HOUSING & REDEVELOP AUTHOR $28,383.07 $28,383.07* 1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL MARCH 21, 2000 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Faust, Hovland, Johnson, and Mayor pro tern Kelly. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Johnson and seconded by Member Faust approving the Council Consent Agenda as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly Motion carried. SUPPORT PROCLAIMED FOR 2000 UNITED STATES CENSUS Coral Houle from the U.S. Census Bureau, explained that Census 2000 is a top , priority for all elected and appointed officials, and encouraged the public to partner with the Bureau in achieving an accurate and complete count in Census 2000. Motion of Member Hovland, seconded by Member Faust adopting the following proclamation: CENSUS 2000 PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, the 2000 Census will determine apportionment of seats in the United States House of Representatives, state legislatures and local governments, and is the basis for . the allocation of billions of dollars of Federal funding; and WHEREAS, Census information is confidential and protected by law, prohibiting any public or private agency from gaining access to confidential Census data; and, WHEREAS, the City of Edina is committed to a full and accurate Census count and is placing special emphasis on enumerating members of traditionally undercounted population groups; and WHEREAS, the City of Edina has agreed to be one of the 39,000 governmental entities in partnership with the U.S. Census Bureau; and, NOW, THEREFORE, I Dennis F. Maetzold, Mayor of the City of Edina hereby proclaim Census 2000 as a top priority for all elected and appointed officials, and encourage the community to place an emphasis on partnering with the U.S. Census Bureau in achieving an accurate and complete count in Census 2000. In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 21st day of March, 2000. Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly Motion carried. RESOLUTION OF. APPRECIATION ADOPTED. COMMENDING CORAL S. HOULE FOR HER YEARS OF PUBLIC SERVICE Motion of Members Faust, Hovland, Johnson & Mayor pro tem , Kelly, seconded by Members Faust, Hovland, Johnson & Mayor pro tem Kelly introducing the following resolution and moving its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2000-36 RESOLUTION OF. APPRECIATION WHEREAS, Coral Houle, served the City of Bloomington for ten years on the City Council, five years as Mayor, and Page 1 Minutes/Edina CitxCouncil/March 21, 2000 WHEREAS, Coral Houle, has been involved serving on Bloomington city boards and commissions back to 1971 when she was first appointed to the City of Bloomington's Human Rights Commission. Coral also served on Bloomington's Planning Commission, Housing and Redevelopment Authority, the Metropolitan Health Board and the Bloomington Port Authority; WHEREAS, Coral Houle has also served the greater Metropolitan Community since 1972 as a volunteer for the American Cancer Society, the Bloomington Coalition Against Violence, Friends of the Minnesota River Valley; and WHEREAS, through these twenty plus years of . public service Coral Houle has demonstrated her care and concern for the public welfare of her fellow citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council, City staff and all Edina residents hereby express their thanks and appreciation to CORAL S. HOULE for her tireless efforts in and sincere dedication to making the Metropolitan Community an outstanding place to live. Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF MARCH 6 2000 APPROVED Motion made by Member Johnson and seconded by Member Faust approving the.Minutes of the Regular Meeting of March 6, 2000. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. RESOLUTION 2000 -32 ADOPTED ORDERING BROOKVIEW .AVENUE AND WEST 56TH STREET CURB AND GUTTER AND PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT IMPROVEMENT NO. B -096 Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Presentation by Engineer Assistant Engineer Houle reminded the Council that this project was approved in July of 1999. He added originally the project was to install concrete curb and gutter and to patch the bituminous pavement along West 56th Street from Oaklawn Avenue to Park Place and along Brookview Avenue south of West Street. However, in August, the bids were rejected because they came in higher than normal. Staff reanalyzed the project to include replacing all of the pavement within the construction area. Any drainage systems in the area would be tied into existing storm sewer. The total project cost was estimated at $90,200 with the storm sewer fund paying for any utility work. The Engineering Department then resurveyed the twelve affected residents. Eleven of the residents responded: one objected to the project, nine supported the project including re- paving the entire road surface, while one supported the project installing the curb and gutter, but only patching the pavement. Mr. Houle reported that the reason for the public hearing was the changed scope of the project from its original proposal. He added that since this project would be assessed under M.S. 429 and was a staff proposed improvement, a four fifth vote of the Council would be necessary to proceed with the project. -Mr. Houle concluded that the engineering staff has reanalyzed the project and feels that it is feasible from an engineering standpoint. Member Hovland asked if th ere was a rough estimate of the individual homeowners' assessments. Mr. Houle explained that an estimate had been sent to each individual property Page 2 Minutes/Edina City Council/March 21, 2000 owner with their hearing notice and the.assessment ranged between $4,000 - $7,000. He added the corner lots will have the largest assessments. Public Comment Pat Turnbull, 5536 Brookview Avenue; stated he was opposed to the project because the cost was too high. Mr. Turnbull said that he initially supported the project, but now as it is proposed the project is too expensive. Paying this assessment would be a hardship because he is retired. Mr. Turnbull wanted to know why curb must be installed on the north side of 561h Street. He stated he objects to the entire project. Mr. Houle noted the higher cost reflects in the increased scope of the project and the relatively small construction area. Engineer Hoffman pointed out that this was an improvement hearing, not an assessment hearing. He added the Council will decide at a later date the method and amount of the special assessment. Manager Hughes said this was the first of three times the Council will review this project, they will review it when awarding the bid and later at the assessment hearing. At that time they may chose a different method of calculating the assessment. The proposed estimate was calculated using $60.00 per linear foot with the sideyards assessed at 1/3 the front yard rate. This can be changed at the Council's discretion. Mr. Hoffman also pointed out that any utility improvement would be paid by the City's Utility funds. Mark McCarthy 5537 Brookview Avenue, expressed concern that he would be assessed again in ten years when the rest of Brookview is re- paved. He also asked whether this project would alleviate the area water from pooling in his front yard. Mr. Houle replied that the new curb and gutter should be able to handle typical ten -year rain fall events. He added that Mr. McCarthy would not be assessed when the remainder of Brookview was re -paved because his property would not be redone a second time. Cheril Morris, 5600 Brookview Avenue, noted that she was one of the petitioners back in 1997. They were originally told the cost would be about $25.00 per linear foot. Ms. Morris said she still supports the project, but is frustrated that it still has not been completed and she worried that any additional delay would just increase the cost. Council Discussion/ Action Member Johnson commented that it seems the high cost of the assessment resulted from the relatively small construction area. He asked why a larger area was not included in the project. Mr. Houle explained that originally in 1999 a larger project extending up to West 55th Street was reviewed. After the initial 1999 hearing, the Council directed that the affected property owners be re- surveyed. Based on the results of that survey the size of the project was reduced. He reiterated that about one third of the $90,000 would be paid from utility funds, and added the catch basin will be rehabbed. He explained the design will handle ten -year rain events, but added a 100 -year event will still most likely inundate many area front yards. Member Hovland stated he could support the project, but would like to see more specific engineering before the bid is awarded. Member Faust asked what per cent of the project would be paid by the utility fund. Mr. Hughes said that approximately 30% will be covered from the storm water utility fund. Page 3 Minutes/Edina City Council/March 21, 2000 Mayor pro tem Kelly pointed out that eleven residents support the project and one has said they do not want to wait longer and have costs increase. Member Johnson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2000-32 ORDERING CURB & GUTTER IMPROVEMENT NO. B -096 WHEREAS, the Edina City Council on the 6th day of March 2000, fixed March 21, 2000, as the date for a council hearing on the proposed concrete curb and gutter installation and replacement of pavement, Improvement No. B -096; and WHEREAS, a report has been prepared by the Edina City Engineer with reference to the Improvement No. B -096 installation of concrete curb and gutter and replacement of pavement on West 56th Street between Oaklawn and Park Place and Brookview Avenue between Woodland Road to West 56th Street, and this report was received by the Council on March 21, 2000; and WHEREAS, ten days' mailed notice and two weeks' published notice of the hearing was given, and the hearing was held thereon on the 21st of March, for Improvement No. B -096 installation of concrete curb and gutter on West 56th Street between Oaklawn and Park Place and Brookview Avenue between Woodland Road to West 56th Street, at which hearing all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Council has duly considered the views of all persons interested, and being fully advised of the pertinent facts, does hereby determine to proceed with the construction of said improvement, including all proceedings which may be necessary in eminent domain for the acquisition of necessary easements and rights hereby designated and shall be referred to in all subsequent proceedings as Improvement No. B -096 installation of concrete curb and gutter and replacement of pavement on West 56th Street between Oaklawn and Park Place and Brookview Avenue between Woodland Road to West 56th Street. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, by the Edina City Council: 1. Improvement No. B -096 installation of concrete curb and gutter and replacement of pavement on West 56th Street between Oaklawn and Park Place and Brookview Avenue between Woodland Road to West 56th Street is hereby ordered as proposed; 2. The Edina City Engineer is hereby designated as the engineer for this improvement. The City Engineer shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvement. 3. The City Engineer is hereby authorized to advertise and take bids for Improvement No. B- 096 installation of concrete curb and gutter, and replacement of pavement on West 56th Street between Oaklawn and Park Place and Brookview Avenue between Woodland Road to West 56th Street. Adopted this 21St day of March, 2000. Motion seconded by Member Hovland. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly Resolution adopted. *BID AWARDED FOR RANGE AND DOME GOLF BALLS FOR BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE Motion made by Member Johnson and seconded by Member Faust for award of bid for range and dome golf balls for Braemar Golf Course to recommended low bidder, Maxfli Golf at $19,827.36. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. Page 4 Minutes/Edina City Council/March 21, 2000 *BID AWARDED FOR COMMODITIES PURCHASE FOR PUBLIC WORKS Motion made by Member Johnson and seconded by Member Faust for award of bid for sand, rock, bituminous materials, concrete, propane and engine oil to recommended low bidders. as follows: Concrete Sand (delivered) to SA -AG at $4.58 per ton; Course Sand (Metro Seal) (delivered) to SA -AG at $6.18 per ton; C1.2 Limestone (delivered) Bryan Rock at $8.77 per ton; Seal Coat Chips (delivered) to Dresser Trap Rock at $23.70 per ton; *Asphalt 2331 (Base Type 31 or 32) (picked up at plant) to Bituminous Roadways (vendor 1) at $21.50 or Midwest Asphalt (vendor 2) at $22.40; *Asphalt 2331 (Base Type 41 or 42) (picked up at plant) to Bituminous Roadways (vendor 1) at $23.50 or Midwest Asphalt (vendor 2) at $25.90; *Asphalt 2331 (wear Type 41 or 42) (picked up at plant) to Bituminous Roadways (vendor 1) at $22.00 and Midwest Asphalt (vendor 2) at $25.00; *Asphalt 2331 (wear type 31 or 32) (picked up at plant) to Bituminous Roadways (vendor 1) at $23.50 or C.S. McCrossan (vendor 2) at $23.00; 233131/32 Asphalt (base type) (delivered) to Bituminous Roadways at $26.00; 23314114 ' 2 Asphalt (base type) (delivered) to Bituminous Roadways at $28.00; 2331 41/42 Asphalt (wear type) (delivered) to Bituminous Roadways at $26.50, 2331 31/32 Asphalt (wear type) (delivered) to Bituminous Roadways at $28.00; Concrete 1 -3 yards (delivered) to Camas at $70.00 per cubic yard; Emulsified Asphalt CRS2, no bid; Emulsified Tack Oil to Bituminous Roadways at $4.00 per gallon; Rubberized Crack Filler to Brock White at $0.2965 per pound; Manhole Covers to Ess Brothers at $73.80 each; Engine Oil 15/40 to Hallman Oil at $3.29 per gallon; Engine Oil 5W/30 to Hallman Oil at $3.29 per gallon; Red Ball Aggregate to Bryan Rock at $12.27 per ton; and Lannon Stone Wall Repair to Bjork Stone at $9.00 per square foot. ( *these items are awarded on basis of total cost per ton including trucking and labor, and past year's performance) Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR WATER TREATMENT CHEMICALS Motion made by Member Johnson and seconded by Member Faust for award of bid for Hydrofluosilic Acid and Liquid Chlorine for City wells and swimming pools to recommended low bidder, Dixie Petro Chem. at $41.66 CWT; and for caustic soda to sole bidder Hawkins Chemical at $25.00 per CWT; and for Polyphosphate Ortho- Phosphate Blend a six month split award to Dixie Petro and Hawkins Chemical at $5.85 per gallon. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF MUNICIPAL LEGISLATIVE COMMISSION JOINT AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT APPROVED Motion made by Member Johnson and seconded by Member Faust introducing: the following resolution: RESOLUTION NO. 2000-33 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF MUNICIPAL LEGISLATIVE COMMISSION JOINT AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes Section 471.59 permits two or more governmental units, by agreement of their governing bodies, to jointly and cooperatively exercise any power common to each of them, and WHEREAS, the parties have entered into this Joint and Cooperative Agreement to develop programs on matters of mutual concern and interest and identify, review and actively oppose proposals which may be in conflict with the interest of the members. Page 5 Minutes/Edina City Council/March 21, 2000 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Mayor and City Clerk of the City of Edina are hereby authorized and directed to execute the Joint and Cooperative Agreement as amended and attached hereto. ADOPTED this 21St day of March, 2000. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT APPROVED FOR NOISE WALL FROM 44TH STREET TO 43RD STREET Motion made by Member Johnson and seconded by Member Faust introducing the following resolution and moving its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2000-34 RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL OF NOISE ABATEMENT WALL ON T.H.100 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina has adopted policies supporting noise abatement along City freeways. WHEREAS, the City Council is aware of the 1997 MnDOT study and associated rankings of the study. WHEREAS, the City Council would encourage MnDOT to seek additional funding to accelerate noise abatement along City freeways. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Edina that the City supports the installation of a noise abatement wall along TH 100 from W. 41st Street to W. 44th Street with. the request that the project include the W. 44th Street bridge on the east side only. Adopted this 21St day of March, 2000. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *RESOLUTION APPROVING SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT ON VERNON AVENUE, IMPROVEMENT #S -080 Motion made by Member Johnson and seconded by Member Faust introducing the following resolution and moving its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2000-35 ORDERING SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT VERNON AVENUE IMPROVEMENT NO. S -080 WHEREAS, a report has been prepared by the Edina City Engineer with reference to the Improvement No. S -080 replacement of bituminous sidewalk along Vernon Avenue from Grandview Avenue to Gleason Road and along Gleason Road from Vernon Avenue to TH 62, and this report was received by the Council on March 21,2000; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Council has duly considered the views of all persons interested, and being fully advised of the pertinent facts, does hereby determine to proceed with the construction of said improvement, including all proceedings which may be necessary in eminent domain for the acquisition of necessary easements and rights hereby designated and shall be referred to in all subsequent proceedings as Improvement No. S -080 replacement of bituminous sidewalk along Vernon Avenue from Grandview Avenue to Gleason Road and along Gleason Road from Vernon Avenue to TH 62. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, by the Edina City Council: 1. Improvement No. S -080 replacement of bituminous sidewalk along Vernon Avenue from Grandview Avenue to Gleason Road and along Gleason Road from Vernon Avenue to TH 62 is hereby ordered as proposed, 2. The Edina City Engineer is hereby designated as the engineer for this improvement. The City Engineer shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvement. Page 6 A Minutes/Edina City Council/March 21, 2000 3. The City Engineer is hereby authorized to advertise and take bids for Improvement No. S- 080 replacement of bituminous sidewalk along Vernon Avenue from Grandview Avenue to Gleason Road and along Gleason Road from Vernon Avenue to TH 62 Adopted this 2161 day of March, 2000. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. CONCERN OF RESIDENT EXPRESSED Doreen Frankel, Concord Elementary School Site Council Chair, and Susan Baker, 5036 Bruce Place, urged the Council to proceed with the joint city/school, district project. She said that Concord is very short of space and must do something to address this,.issue. Ms. Frankel said Concord's parents and staff are very excited and anxious to have the City build the additional classroom at Concord. Mark Lofthus, 5205 Danens Drive, Kathy Christiansen, 6841 Oaklawn Avenue, Steve Henke, 4386 Macke Drive, Sharrie Peterson, 6121 Artic Way, Mark Jones, 4805 School Road, Camile Nash, and Laura Knolls, all expressed concern with the potential joint school board /city project proposed for the Community Center which houses the French Immersion Elementary School. The parents concerns included security, parking, building access, the process followed by the school district and city, and the potential negative impact on the French Immersion School. Mayor pro tern Kelly acknowledged the parents concerns. He informed them that they should be contacting the Edina School District Board to voice their concerns relative to issues impacting school operations which were totally outside of the City's control. Mayor pro tern Kelly explained the reason the dialogue started about finding additional gymnasium space and more athletic fields was because parents of children participating in athletic programs complained that their children were playing and practicing after 9:00 p.m. The Council also looked at what Edina needs to make the community attractive to residents and maintain its high value housing stock. To do this, Edina must compete with neighboring communities which offer facilities such as the proposed field house project. He noted that many factors were. looked at before the Community Center was chosen as the site for the additional gyms. Mayor pro tern Kelly added that he believed the Normandale Elementary School was an asset to the community and that the concerns as stated can be worked through before the project is completed. The process is on going. At this point the Memorandum of Understanding with the Edina School District has not yet been completed. No final plans have been drawn. It is early in the process and he believed the parents still have time to be heard. Member Faust stated that it should be very clear to the School District that they should be communicating with their constituents. She added the City would have legal issues building any classroom space, so any additional classroom space at Concord Elementary would be the School District's responsibility, not the City's. Member Hovland expressed his concern at the lack of information the parents feel has been disseminated. He said that more information will be forthcoming as the true scope of the project is ascertained. Member Hovland said that he thought the safety, security and traffic concerns expressed this evening and two weeks ago would be addressed. In fact he raised these issues at a meeting with the School District and was assured they would be addressed. Member Hovland added that many factors were reviewed before deciding to locate the proposed additional gyms at the Community Center. Page 7 Minutes/Edina City Council/March 21, 2000 Member Johnson said he was on the School Board when it was decided to locate the French Immersion School at the Community Center. At that time the Board felt it was in the best interest of the entire community. Now both the Council and School Board again must decide what is best for the entire community. He noted that some issues of local concern may need to be compromised to fulfill the needs of the greater community. Member Johnson agreed with Mayor pro tern Kelly about the scope of the City's control over programming or programming space of any facility that is owned by the Edina School District. DISCUSSION OF STUDYING SOUTHDALE AREA Mayor pro tem Kelly suggested hiring an urban land planning consultant put to together a comprehensive plan for France Avenue north of the Galleria. He expressed his concern for moving ahead with the Fairview Southdale project before the greater Southdale area is looked at in more detail. He also expressed his reservations about the Fairview proposal. The Council briefly discussed the possibility of using a consultant to develop a comprehensive plan for use when development proposals are made along the France Avenue corridor. The City Manager was directed to contact Mark Enger of Fairview Southdale to suggest a work session reviewing their proposal before further Council action. *DESIGNATION AND RESERVE OF FUND BALANCE APPROVED Motion made by Member Johnson and seconded by Member Faust to approve the designation and reserve of Fund Balance as presented. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. CLAIMS PAID Motion made by Member Johnson approving payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated, and consisting of 32 pages: General Fund $200,813.53; Communications $7,648.65; Working Capital $11,716.48; Art Center $10,033.37; Golf Dome Fund $17,410.39; Swimming. Pool Fund $7,034.26; Golf Course Fund $32,749.16; Ice Arena Fund $39,282.95; Edinborough/Centennial Lakes $23,178.43; Utility Fund $80,980.21; Storm Sewer Utility Fund $1,000.00; Recycling Program $37,935.20; Liquor Dispensary Fund $218,515.16; Construction Fund $16,400.24; TOTAL $704,698.03. Member Faust seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly Motion carried. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor pro tern Kelly adjourned the Council Meeting at 9:15 P.M. City Clerk Page 8 N r� l o e v A y REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # II. A. From: Francis J. Hoffman- Consent ❑ City Engineer Information Only ❑ Date: April 4, 2000 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Vacation of Public Street Action ❑ Motion and Easements in ® Resolution Braewood Park Plat/ ❑Ordinance TH 494 & TH 169 ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Recommend vacating existing utility and drainage easements in Braewood Park plat around exterior of plat except for the easterly 175 feet and the W. 78th Street cul -de -sac west of the easterly 175 feet. Info /Background: This vacation of easements and roadway will facilitate the re- platting of the parcel that the City will sell to the developer. The new plat will have easements replacing the old as necessary and leave easements in place for the Minnesota Department of Transportation and Northern States Power Company (NSP). The City will also reserve the rights for Paragon Cable and NSP on the southerly side of the site. Staff recommends the vacation subject to retention of the cul -de -sac until completion of the frontage road and relocating adjacent driveway from the property to the east. �' THE N. LU //Q O, -C=G /R T / /L, o - i ti o I �9 l ate, 73 I. V m SLie �'39'F Proposed Vacation Area ❑ lk --7 4 / Z4 /NACU ANO (/T /CITY EAjS MEN T �l a n 6, y I ; � 0 0 l/J ul�o �< 01 W Z Q i Itv f 0 CO z go I 3 +l 0 F �W a tii �3� �► LL. LL a W W i ti o I �9 l ate, 73 I. V m SLie �'39'F Proposed Vacation Area ❑ lk --7 4 / Z4 /NACU ANO (/T /CITY EAjS MEN T n I ; � 0 0 01 W Z ?u, P, W x f 0 z I 3 +l 0 �W LL. LL a W W J ti i -- I vp 3 Q - = w 78TH STREET - r'i9�Z9' " � e• �� X73 i6 . J L - - =• - -- - I / WETLAND 1 1 t 1 ,� xarf.8 83/Ax t X or 1 %% 100 —YEAR FLOOD xar /.9 t ZONE 0 I �% t 1 %` 831.8 y ``% `:lp . ar1.1 x831./ ; WOODED AREA \ -- - - - - -- - \ 831.7 '�''• 2? x �`y�1 ♦ 83 �t 8 1 `'* ,Qd 8�3•'j 1f�``\ `� �_ _ ____= ?r_x ,9 78TH ,. -8r7.7 - Z. =' = - ,.� STREET /' _ 1 WOODED AREA rOtd 837 Sea x838.5 837 W70 x effumwm 838 10- 89001`37" B 196.50 r83787 arse 12- WI TMH 838.18 10" SAN REC. NV. 830.8 i r 1 r 1 &M4 x r 1 � J r r 1 r r J / J / omen/ I J / J I J J / J / I6/ / /o/ / LIGHT POI - / 833.7 8367 / ft Adjacent Property Driveway SAX TM STORM W pu mm 270 1 ".+/- RCCOXO P4 o e o REPORT /RECOMMENDATION TO: Mayor & City Council From: Craig Larsen City Planner Date: April 4, 2000 Subject: Fairview Southdale Hospital 6401 France Avenue South. Building Expansion and Parking Ramp Construction Recommendation: ' Agenda Item: III. A, B & C Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ❑ Motion ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion 1. Adopt Response to Comments, Findings of Fact, and Record of Decision not to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). 2. Adopt Resolution approving Final Development Plan for Hospital /MOB Addition 3. Adopt Resolution approving Conditional Use Permit for parking structure at 6400 France Avenue South. Info /Background: Attached please find: 1. Written comments on the draft EAW. 2. Response to Comments, Findings of Fact, and Record of Decision on EAW. 3. Other written comments received since February 15, 2000. 4. Additional plans and perspectives. i EAW COMMENTS ` , \NNESpt, - � s Minnesota Department of Transportation Metropolitan Division Waters Edge 1500 West County Road 132 Roseville, MN 55113 March 8, 2000 City of Edina Attn: Craig Larsen 4801 West 501h Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Dear Craig Larsen: SUBJECT: Fairview Southdale Expansion / Environmental Assessment Worksheet Minnesota Department of Transportation Review #EAW00 -004 Edina, Hennepin County C.S. 2774 The Metro Division of the Minnesota Department of Transportation has reviewed the Fairview Southdale Expansion Environmental Assessment Worksheet. We recommend consideration of the following comments prior to further development: The traffic analysis only looked at peak p.m. numbers. We are also concerned that a.m. traffic could be backed up on TH62 ramps. We request an additional analysis be completed that includes the a.m. figures. If a signal is added to the intersection at TH62 and Valley View Road for traffic wishing to go westbound on TH62 we recommend closing the 64th Street access and center median to Valley View Road. We do not recommend a signal at the eastbound exit ramp to Valley View Road. The ramp is too short and a signal at this location would affect the left turning queue for westbound TH62. The short length of the eastbound exit ramp does not allow for traffic to turn left on Valley View to get to 65th Street. We will not open the median for this purpose. If you have any questions regarding Mn/DOT's traffic concerns please contact Lars Impola in our Traffic section at (612) 797 -3126. • Mn/DOT is very concerned about the storm sewer system from this development "as it is connected to the TH62 system. Rates of runoff from the Phase I & II on the east side of France Avenue are going to increase to the TH62 system which is already under sized and surcharged. An equal opportunity employer 4 City of Edina March 8, 2000 Page 2 We need to review drainage computations and drainage area maps showing existing and proposed conditions and addressing 100 -year storms. Existing drainage patterns and rates of runoff affecting Mn/DOT right of way should be perpetuated. The site's storm water discharge rate must not increase. In a conversation with Bill Burns of BRW about this project and runoff rates, it was stated that the project was going to add approximately 7000 sq. ft. of impervious surface to the east side of France Avenue. If this is still true, ponding will be required. As the project area is limited, an underground storage tank (box culverts) may be required to pond the 100 -year storm event. Please forward the computations and drainage area maps to Patrick McLamon in our Water Resources section at 2055 N. Lilac Dr., Golden Valley, 55422. A Mn/DOT stormwater drainage permit will also be required. Please forward a copy of the hydraulic computations and drainage area maps to Keith VanWagner in our Permits section at the Roseville address listed above. If you have any questions regarding Mn/DOT's permit process Keith can be reached at (651) 582 =1443. This letter represents the transportation concerns of Mn/DOT Metro Division. Other environmental concerns raised by a wider Mn/DOT review may be forwarded to you in a separate letter. If you have any additional questions regarding this review please call me at (651) 582 -1468. Sincerely, MT Sharon Anderson Transportation Planner / Local Government Liaison Cc: Gerald Larson — Mn/DOT Environmental Services Daniel Weber — Vice President, Fairview Southdale Hospital Sent by: WENCK ASSOC. 612 479 4242; 11 -Wenck March 8, 2000 Mr. Craig Larsen City Planner City of Edina Edina City Hall 4801 West 501" Street Edina, MN 55424 03/08/00 14:57; #126; Page 1/1 Re: Fairview Southdale Medical Campus Expansion EAW Dear Mr. Larsen: Wwm k ASSQCI*5te5, 10C. 'IM) 11ionuar (:ruck Cv. P.O. 11m 428 M,r1�lt Plain. MN S5.i5N -r)a�g 16111 479 -4:00 Far (h 12) 479 -4142 k•mail wr�nckngiLd�wanck.c:um Thank you for the submittal of the Fairview Southdale Medical Campus Expansion Environmental Assessment Worksheet. The proposed development, however, is outside the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District legal boundaries. Therefore, we advise that Fairview Southdale follow the recommendations of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. if you have any questions, please call me at (612) 479 -4282. Sincerely, WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. Lisa A. Tilman Project Engineer Post -R` Fax Note 7671 Dare 311 Dv Uso. T from Co! Da Co. Ptone, Al P ones •L Z F ` -O� --t2-4 2- - Minnesota Pollution Control Agency March 8, 2000 Mr. Craig Larsen Edina City Planner . 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 RE: Fairview Southdale Medical Campus Expansion Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) Dear Mr. Larsen: The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) staff has reviewed the above - referenced EAW and offer the following comments for your consideration as you determine whether an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is needed for this project. Item 8. Permits and Approvals Required The list of permit and approvals needed for this project does not include the MPCA's General Stormwater Permit. This permit is required since the total amount of soil disturbed during construction would exceed 5 acres. Please ensure that the proposer understands this requirement. For more information on the permit, please contact Mr. Keith Cherryholmes at (651) 296 -6945. Item 22 - Vehicle - related Air Emissions An Indirect Source Permit (ISP) is required for the project since the project is expected to have 2,066 total parking spaces, which exceeds the parking spaces threshold requirement needed for an ISP. MPCA staff has met with the project proposer's consultant to discuss the traffic and air quality analysis needed for the ISP application. The EAW document has adequately addressed both traffic and air quality impacts expected from the proposed project. Included in the EAW is a traffic impact study which includes average daily traffic generated, trip generation and distribution estimates, and level of service (LOS) capacity analysis. A traffic analysis was conducted at key intersections in the project area to assess the potential traffic impacts relating to the site generated traffic. MPCA staff notes that based on the traffic study, considerable congestion currently exists in the project area, particularly at the signalized intersections along France Avenue, and that the level of congestion contributed by the hospital expansion traffic is relatively small at the key intersections. Project related roadway improvements, and non - project related improvements to address existing operational problems are recommended in the EAW. The MPCA staff stresses that the recommended roadway improvements be implemented to improve traffic flow, maintain traffic operations at an acceptable LOS, and avoid potential carbon monoxide (CO) hot spots in the project area. The potential air quality impacts of the proposed project were identified by modeling future traffic flow and the resulting CO concentrations in the project area. The air quality analysis shows that based upon the predicted one -hour and eight -hour maximum CO concentrations for the year 2005 (one year after project build out), no violations of the state ambient air quality standards for CO are predicted. 520 Lafayette Rd. N.; St. Paul, MN 55155 -4194; (651) 296 -6300 (Voice); (651) 282 -5332 (TTY) Regional Offices: Duluth • Brainerd • Detroit Lakes • Marshall • Rochester Equal Opportunity Employer • Printed on recycled paper containing at least 20% fibers from paper recycled by consumers. Mr. Craig Larsen Page Two However, it is not clear if the recommended roadway improvements were assumed in the air quality analysis. If all or any of the recommended improvements were assumed in the air quality analysis, a legally binding commitment to funding those improvements is needed before an ISP can be issued in final form. The ISP will include a provision requiring completion of the assumed improvements before occupancy of the proposed project. Lastly, no estimate of the current and projected availability of mass transit service to the project area is included in the EAW document. The EAW should provide some discussion of the transit system, and rideshare and carpool programs to the site to help in reducing the number of single occupancy vehicle trips and traffic congestion in the project area. Thank you for the oppoitanity to review ibis project. As the responsible governmental unit for this environmental review, the city of Edina is required to prepare specific responses to comments on the EAW. The city of Edina is also required to provide notice of its decision on the need for an EIS to all persons on the EAW distribution list and a copy of the responses to all persons who submitted timely and substantive comments (ref. Minn. R. 4410.1700, subp. 4 & 5). The MPCA must receive notice of a negative declaration for this project in order to proceed with permitting.. We also seek the .opportunity.to review the responses to comments on the EAW prior to the issuance of the MPCA permits or approvals for the project so that pertinent information may be reflected in these decisions. If you have any questions concerning our review of this EAW, please contact me at (651) 282 -5992. Sincerely, Lynne- Kolze Planner Principal Operations and Planning Section Metro District LK:sjs cc: Mary Hoffman -Lynn, PP /CAP Keith Cherryholmes, MD /CAP MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE March 6, 2000 Mr. Craig Larson City Planner Edina City Hall 4801 West 50"' Street Edina, MN 55424 RE: _ EAW - Fairview Southdale Medical Campus Expansion Edina, Hennepin County SHPO Number: 2000 -0846 Dear Mr. Larson: Thank you for providing this office with a copy of the EAW for the above - referenced project. It has been reviewed pursuant to responsibilities given to the Minnesota Historical Society by the Minnesota Historic Sites Act and the Minnesota Field Archaeology Act and through the process outlined in Minnesota Rules 4410.1600. There are no properties listed on the National or State Registers of Historic Places, and no known or suspected archaeological properties in the area that will be affected by this project. Therefore, in our opinion, the "no" response to question 25a is appropriate. Please note that this comment letter does not address the requirements of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and 36CFR800, Procedures of the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation for the protection of historic properties. If this project is considered for federal assistance, or requires a federal permit or license, it should be submitted to our office with reference to the assisting federal agency. Please contact Dennis Gimmestad at (651)296 -5462 if you have any questions regarding our review of this project. Sincerely, try tv-Await Britta L. Bloomberg Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer 345 KELLOGG BOULEVARD WEST / SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55102 -1906 / TELEPHONE: 651- 296 -6126 March 1, 2000 Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Craig Larsen, City Planner City of Edina, City Hall 4801 West 50'h Street Edina, MN 55424 500 Lafayette Road 10 St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 -40 RE: Fairview Southdale Medical Campus Expansion Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) Dear Mr. Larsen: The Department of Natural Resources (DNR) has reviewed the EAW for the Fairview Southdale Medical Campus Expansion project. We have no project- related comments to offer at this time. We do not recommend preparation of an environmental impact statement (EIS) based upon natural resource considerations. Thank you for the opportunity to review this project. We look forward to receiving your record of decision and responses to comments at the conclusion of the environmental review. Minnesota Rules part 4410.1700, subparts 4 & 5, require you to send us your Record of Decision within five days of deciding this action. Please contact Bill Johnson of my staff at (651) 296 -9229 if you have questions regarding this letter. Sincerely, Thomas W. Balcom, Supervisor Environmental Planning and Review Section Office of Management and Budget Services c: Kathleen Wallace Con Christianson Joe Oschwald Russ Peterson, USFWS Jon Larsen, EQB Daniel Weber, Vice President, Fairview Southdale Hospital #20000510 -0002 SOUTHDALE. WPD 1 DNR Information: 651- 296 -6157 • 1- 888 -646 -6367 • TTY: 651- 296 -5484 • 1- 800 - 657 -3929 An Equal Opportunity Employer Printed on Recycled Paper Containing a Who Values Diversity %0 Minimum of 10% Post - Consumer Waste A RESPONSE TO COMMENTS, FINDINGS OF FACT, . AND RECORD OF DECISION FOR THE FAIRVIEW SOUTHDALE MEDICAL CAMPUS EXPANSION ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET RGU City of Edina Craig Larsen City Planner Edina City Hall 4801 West 50'h Street Edina, MN 55424 Phone: (612) 927 -8861 Fax: (612) 826 -0390 (EAW) MARCH 2000 PROPOSER Fairview Southdale Hospital Daniel Weber Vice President Fairview Southdale Hospital 6401 France Avenue South Edina, MN 55435 Phone: (612) 924 -5112 Fax: (612) 924 -1501 Approved by the City of Edina City Council on i CITY OF EDINA RESPONSE TO COMMENTS, FINDINGS OF FACT, AND RECORD OF DECISION FOR THE FAIRVIEW SOUTHDALE MEDICAL CAMPUS EXPANSION ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET (EAW) III lial i 11 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................. ..............................1 RESPONSETO COMMENTS ......................................................................... ..............................1 EAW Notification, Distribution, and Comment Period ................................. ..............................1 Comments Received and Responses .............................................................. ..............................1 Wenck Associates, Lisa A. Tilman, March 8, 2000 ................................. ............................... I Minnesota Department of Transportation, Sharon Anderson, March 8, 2000 ......................1 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Lynne Kolze, March 8, 2000 ....... ..............................2 State Historic Preservation Office, Britta L. Bloomberg, March 6, 2000 .............................3 Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Thomas W. Balcom, March 1, 2000 .............3 FINDINGSOF FACT ........................................................................................ ..............................3 ProjectDescription ......................................................................................... ..............................3 ProposedProject .......... ...........:................................. ........................................................... 3 Site Description and Existing Conditions .............:.................................. ..............................3 Criteria to Decide if the Project has Potential for Significant Environmental Effects ................4 Criteria A: Type, Extent, and Reversibility of Environmental Effects ..... ..............................4 Criteria B: Cumulative Potential Effects of Related or Anticipated Future Projects ...........6 Criteria C: Extent to Which the Environmental Effects are Subject to Mitigation ...............6 Criteria D: Extent to Which Environmental Effects can be Anticipated and Controlled ...... 7 RECORDOF DECISION ................................................................................. ..............................8 RESPONSE TO COMMENTS, FINDINGS OF FACT, AND RECORD OR DECISION Fairview Southdale Medical Campus Expansion Environmental Assessment Worksheet INTRODUCTION Fairview Southdale Hospital is proposing a three -phase expansion of the Fairview Southdale Medical Campus. The expansion includes an expansion of the hospital, medical office building, and medical building to the east of France Avenue, construction of a 4 -level parking ramp to the west of France Avenue, and a skyway connecting the two units. An Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) was voluntarily prepared pursuant to Minnesota Rules 4410.1000 Subp. 3(A). The EAW and the respective comments have been reviewed in accordance with Minnesota Rules 4410.1700 to determine if the project has potential for significant environmental effects. This document includes response to comments received by the City of Edina (City), Findings of Fact supporting the decision, and'the Record of Decision indicating an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not necessary for this project. RESPONSE TO COMMENTS EAW Notification, Distribution, and Comment Period In accordance with Minnesota Rules 4410.1500, the EAW was completed and distributed on January 31, 2000, to all persons and agencies on the official Environmental Quality Board (EQB) mailing list and other interested parties. The notification was published in the EQB Monitor on February 7, 2000, initiating the 30 -day comment period. A press release was issued, and included in the February 9, 2000, edition of the Edina Sun Current. A public information meeting for the project was held as part of the February 15, 2000, City Council Meeting. The comment period ended on March 8, 2000. Comments Received and Responses Wenck Associates Lisa A. Tilman, March 8. 2000 The comment letter states that the proposed development is outside of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District legal boundaries and advised that Fairview Southdale follow the recommendations of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. Response: Comment noted. Minnesota Department of Transportation Sharon Anderson March 8 2000 The comment letter states that Mn/DOT recommends consideration of the following comments prior to further development. Traffic Request additional traffic analysis be completed that includes a.m. figures. City of Edina March 2000 Page 1 RESPONSE TO COMMENTS, FINDINGS OF FACT, AND RECORD OR DECISION Fairview Southdale Medical Campus Expansion Environmental Assessment Worksheet Recommends closing 60 Street access and center median to Valley View Road if signal is added to the intersection at TH62 and Valley View Road for traffic wishing to go westbound on TH62. Does not recommend a signal at the eastbound exit ramp to Valley View Road. Response: Following receipt of the comment letter from MnDOT, city staff met with MnDOT representatives to discuss the reconstruction of Valley View Road at TH 62. Specifically, the city is currently in the process of developing a layout plan to rebuild the off - ramp at Valley View /TH 62. The city will submit the layout to MnDOT for review. The reconstruction of the ramp would include providing a signal and queue detection device to avoid traffic backing up on TH62. Runoff Concerned about the storm sewer system from development as it is connected to the TH62 system. Rates of runoff from the Phase I and II on the east side of France Avenue are going to increase to the TH62 system which is already under sized and surcharged. Existing drainage patterns and rates of runoff affecting Mn/DOT right of way should be perpetuated. The site's storm water discharge rate must not increase. Response: As indicated in Question 17 of the EAW, the impervious surface area within the 17.4 —acre campus would actually decrease with the proposed development. Therefore, with the completed project there will be a slight reduction in the quantity and no change in the quality of the runoff. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. L=e Kolze. March 8. 2000 Item 8 —Permits and Approvals Required The comment letter states that a MPCA's General Stormwater Permit is required since the total amount of soil disturbed during construction would exceed 5 acres. Response: The MPCA's General Stormwater Permit requirement has been added to the Required Permits and Approval table. Item 22 — Vehicle- related Air Emissions "MPCA staff notes that based on the traffic study, considerable congestion currently exists in the project area, particularly at the signalized, intersections along France Avenue, and that the level of congestion contributed by the hospital expansion traffic is relatively small at the key intersections. Project related roadway improvements, and non - project related improvements to address existing operational problems are recommended in the EAW. The MPCA staff stresses that the recommended roadway improvements be implemented to improve traffic City of Edina March 2000 Page 2 RESPONSE TO COMMENTS, FINDINGS OF FACT, AND RECORD OR DECISION Fairview Southdale Medical Campus Expansion Environmental Assessment Worksheet flow, maintain traffic operations at an acceptable LOS, and avoid potential carbon monoxide (CO) hot spots in the project area." "The air quality analysis shows that based upon the predicted one -hour and eight -hour maximum CO concentrations for the year 2005 (one year after project build out), no violations of the state ambient air quality standards for CO are predicted... However, it is not clear if the recommended roadway improvements were assumed in the air quality analysis." Response: No roadway improvements were included in the air quality analysis. Any roadway improvements made will reduce congestion and, therefore, reduce CO concentrations. "The EAW should provide some discussion of the transit system, and rideshare and carpool programs to the site..." Response: Mass transit service to Fairview Southdale Hospital is provided primarily by three bus routes: • Metro Transit Route 6 provides frequent weekday and weekend service on France Avenue between downtown Minneapolis and 69`h Street. Metro Transit Route 15 provides limited service on 66' Street from the Richfield/V.A. Hospital/Mall of America areas. BE -Line Route 88 provides service on York Avenue from the East Bloomington area. Service frequency is approximately every hour Monday through Friday between 6:30 a.m. and 10:30 p.m. and on Saturdays. State Historic Preservation Office, Britta L. Bloomberg. March 6. 2000 The comment letter stated there are no properties listed on the National or State Registers of Historic Places, and no known or suspected archaeological properties in the area that will be affected by this project. If this project -is considered for federal assistance, or requires a federal permit or license, it should be submitted to our office with reference to the assisting federal agency. Response: Comment noted. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Thomas W. Balcom. March 1. 2000 The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources' comment letter states that an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not necessary for this project. Response: Comment noted. City of Edina March 2000 Page 3 RESPONSE TO COMMENTS, FINDINGS OF FACT, AND RECORD OR DECISION Fairview Southdale Medical Campus Expansion Environmental Assessment Worksheet FINDINGS OF FACT Project Description Proposed Project The project site is located at 6401 France Avenue South in Edina, Minnesota. Fairview Southdale Hospital's proposed project calls for a four -story, 174,000 sf hospital expansion to the west and north of the existing facility, a four - level, 970 - vehicle parking ramp west of France Avenue, and an east/west connection via a skyway. The expansion includes a heart center, additional operating and diagnostic rooms, a medical office building and conference center, and expanded public spaces. There will be a reconfiguration of the existing hospital space to provide for a more efficient operation and greater patient privacy. All three phases of the project are scheduled to be completed by the fourth quarter of 2004. Site Description and Existing Conditions The proposed project site is in an area that has served as a commercial corridor for the City of Edina since the 1960s. In 1964 a building permit was issued to the Fairview Hospital for the construction of a five -story hospital building. Additions and expansions to the original site since 1964 include: construction of a parking ramp east of the existing structure to accommodate the growing demand for parking an ancillary freestanding medical building to the north of the hospital and directly west of the parking ramp an outpatient surgery center on the east side of the medical campus and south of the parking ramp The proposed parking ramp site west of France Avenue was originally developed into an office building. In 1996, the office building was removed and a parking low constructed. The areas surrounding the project site are developed for transportation, institutional, commercial, office, and residential uses. The proposed project is a continuation of the development patterns of the last 35 years along France Avenue and is similar in purpose to City of Edina March 2000 Page 4 RESPONSE TO COMMENTS, FINDINGS OF FACT, AND RECORD OR DECISION Fairview Southdale Medical Campus Expansion Environmental Assessment Worksheet the existing land uses in the area. A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) update was completed for 6401 France Avenue South in July of 1990 for the construction of the Fairview Southdale Physicians Building. The conclusion of the Phase I ESA was that "...history review and exterior site reconnaissance did not produce any indications of documented or observable environmental hazards associated with past or present land use activities on the site." No off -site environmental hazards were identified at that time. A Phase I ESA was completed in 1993 prior to the demolition of an office building at 6400 France Avenue. This area is now used as a surface parking lot and is the proposed location of the 970 - vehicle parking ramp. The 1993 Phase I ESA identified the potential hazards and recommended remedial procedures to take place prior to the demolition of the office building. Criteria to Decide if the Project has Potential for Significant Environmental Effects Criteria A: Type, Extent, and Reversibility of Environmental Effects According to Minnesota Rules 4410.1700 Subp. 7(A), the first factor that the City must consider is the "type, extent, and reversibility of environmental effects." The City's findings are set forth below. 1. Project Site. The site is currently developed and used primarily for institutional activities. 2. Fish, Wildlife, and Ecologically Sensitive Resources. The proposed project will not have any significant impacts on fish, wildlife, and ecologically sensitive resources in the area. 3. Water Resources. The proposed project is not anticipated to have an effect on water resources in the area. 4. Water Use. • Water usage from the municipal system will increase from an estimated 49 MG to 76 MG. • Phase I improvements will require an additional 8" diameter water service for added fire protection and a 4" diameter water service to provide' additional domestic water supply for the proposed expansion. • Well No. 2 will be abandoned and capped • A water service connection will be required • A well abandonment permit will be required 1. Water- related Land Use Management Districts. The project site does not intersect any areas identified as 100 -year flood plain. City of Edina March 2000 Page 5 RESPONSE TO COMMENTS, FINDINGS OF FACT, AND RECORD OR DECISION Fairview Southdale Medical Campus Expansion Environmental Assessment Worksheet 2. Soils. Soils above the water table consist primarily of medium sands with some fine and course sand layers. Vegetated areas are overlaid with black silty clay loams. Soils below the water table generally consist of clay and silty clay loams. The upper layers of the existing soils consisting of fine to course sand layers are considered moderately to highly impermeable. 3. Erosion and Sedimentation. • Construction will disturb approximately 6.3 acres of soil and remove about 20,500 cubic yards primarily during basement construction. • To minimize the migration of soil off -site during construction, a silt fence will be installed on the perimeter of the site area to be disturbed. • Hay bales or a silt fence will enclose all catch basins on -site to filter storm water runoff prior to it being discharged off -site. As a method to clean tires, vehicle exits from the site will have rock filter dikes contiguous to the public roadway. • Paved roadways contiguous to the site shall be kept clean of sedimentation. • Areas not paved will be landscaped with sod or covered with inert ground cover. • Approval of the erosion control plan will be required. Water Quality — Surface Water Runoff. A storm sewer lead will need to be extended east on 65' Street from the swimming pool pond to serve the site on the west side of France Avenue. 2. Water Quality — Wastewater. A 12" Dip sanitary service from the city sanitary sewer will be required. A 12" sanitary sewer will constructed from an existing sanitary sewer manhole on the west side of France Avenue. 1. Ground Water — Potential for Contamination. Storage of any buried bulk liquid waste or chemical products other than petroleum are not proposed. 2. Solid Wastes. At the completion of construction, the Hospital will generate an additional 11,000 pounds of solid waste. 3. Traffic. The additional trips expected due to the Hospital expansion and the adjacent Northco expansion are not expected to worsen the operations of the adjacent roadways and signals significantly. 4. Air Quality. Worst -case predicted CO concentrations are below the state ambient air quality standards, including conservative estimates of background air quality. An Indirect Source Permit will be required. 5. Adverse Visual Impacts. No significant visual impacts are expected. City of Edina March 2000 Page 6 RESPONSE TO COMMENTS, FINDINGS OF FACT, AND RECORD OR DECISION Fairview Southdale Medical Campus Expansion Environmental Assessment Worksheet 6. Odors, Noise, and Dust. Perceptible noise will be generated during construction. Mitigation for noise during construction includes: • Turn off idling equipment or move it away from noise sensitive areas • Make sure all equipment is properly muffled and in good repair ■ Restrict construction activities to typical business hours (7 a.m. to 6 p.m.) ■ Locate stationary equipment as far from noise sensitive areas as possible 1. Compatibility with Plans. All phases of the proposed project are compatible with existing zoning. A variance will be required to construct a four -level ramp to the west France Avenue, and for the ringroad on the east side of France Avenue. Criteria B: Cumulative Potential Effects of Related or Anticipated Future Projects According to Minnesota Rules 4410.1700 Subp. 7(B), the second factor the City must consider is the "cumulative potential effects of related or anticipated future projects." The City's findings are set forth below. No cumulative impacts have been identified. Criteria C: Extent to Which the Environmental Effects are Subject to Mitigation According to Minnesota Rules 4410.1700 Subp. 7(C), the third factor the City must consider is the "extent to which the environmental effects are subject to mitigation by ongoing public regulatory authority." The City's findings are set forth below. City of Edina March 2000 Page 7 RESPONSE TO COMMENTS, FINDINGS OF FACT, AND RECORD OR DECISION Fairview Southdale Medical Campus Expansion Environmental Assessment Worksheet The following permits and approval are required for this project: Unit of Government Type of Application Status State Historic Preservation Cultural Resources Review Letter received January Office 13, 2000 Minnesota Pollution Control Indirect Source Permit To be applied for Agency General Stormwater Permit To be applied for Minnesota Department of Approval of storm sewer revisions Transportation Minnesota Department of National Heritage Program Completed January 5, Natural Resources Threatened and Endangered 2000 Species Review Minnesota Department of Well Abandonment To be submitted Public Health Nine Mile Creek Watershed Storm Water Management Plan To be applied for Grading and Earthmoving Permit To be applied for Final development plan approval To be applied for City of Edina Sanitary sewer service To be applied for Water service connection To be applied for Building Permit To be applied for Variance for Parking Ramp To be applied for Variance for Ringroad To be applied for The potential environmental effects associated with this project are less than significant and will be mitigated in accordance with applicable rules and regulations. The City of Edina therefore finds that the potential environmental effects of the project are "subject to mitigation by ongoing public regulatory authority" and an EIS need not be prepared. Criteria D: Extent to Which Environmental Effects can be Anticipated and Controlled According to Minnesota Rules 4410.1700 Subp. 7(D), the fourth factor the City must consider is the "extent to which environmental effects can be anticipated and controlled as a result of other environmental studies undertaken by public agencies or the project proposer, or of EIS's previously prepared on similar projects." The City's findings are set forth below. City of Edina March 2000 Page 8 RESPONSE TO COMMENTS, FINDINGS OF FACT, AND RECORD OR DECISION Fairview Southdale Medical Campus Expansion Environmental Assessment Worksheet 1. The EAW, in conjunction with this document, contains or references the known studies that provide information or guidance regarding environmental effects which can be anticipated and controlled. 2. An EIS is not necessary for this project. 3. In light of the results of environmental review and permitting processes, the City of Edina finds that the environmental effects of the project can be adequately anticipated and controlled. City of Edina March 2000 Page 9 '1. RESOLUTION NO. CITY OF EDINA A RESOLUTION APPROVING NEGATIVE DECLARATION WHEREAS, Fairview Southdale Hospital is the proposer of the project consisting of a 174,000 square foot expansion to the west and north of the existing facility, a four- level, 970 - vehicle parking ramp west of France Avenue, and an east/west connection via a skyway, located in the city of Edina (the "City "); and WHEREAS, the city of Edina is the Responsible Governmental Unit pursuant to Minnesota Rules Part 4410.0500; and WHEREAS, the EAW was prepared using the form approved by the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board for EAW's in accordance with Minnesota Rules 4410.1300; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Minnesota Rules 4410.1500, the EAW was completed and distributed on January 31, 2000 to all persons and agencies on the official Environmental Quality Board distribution list; and WHEREAS, the notification of the EAW was published in the Minnesota EQB Monitor on February 7, 2000; and WHEREAS, the public review and comment period remained open until March 8, 2000; and WHEREAS, the comments on the EAW were received and responded to; and WHEREAS, this decision is made in compliance with the time schedule provided in Minnesota Rules 4410.1700; and WHEREAS, the record considered by the City Council for purposes of it decision herein consists of the EAW, related reports and analysis; the comments received thereon, and the responses to such comments, all of which are incorporated herein and made a part of this decision; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, acting with respect to the Environmental Assessment Worksheet for the Fairview Southdale Medical Campus Expansion, that it finds and concludes the following: The EAW was prepared in compliance with the procedures of the Minnesota Policy Act and Minnesota Rules, Parts 4410.1000 to 4410.1700; and n 2. The EAW satisfactorily addressed all of the issues for which existing information could have been reasonably obtained; and 3., The findings of fact contained in Exhibit A (attached) are made; and 4. Based on criteria established in Minnesota Rules 4410.1700, and the findings of fact', the Project does not have.a potential for signficant environmental effects; and 5. An Environmental Impact Statement is not required, and the City of Edina therefore makes a "Negative Declaration ". Adopted by the City Council .of the City of Edina, Minnesota this day 03/31/00 FRI 12:02 FAX 612 204 0645 MN HEART CLINIC 1 March 31, 2000 ..Hear I t The Honorable Dennis Metzold Mayor 1111 C` ; City of Edina 4801 West 50`s Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Stephen C. Battista, M.D. Rodrigo C. Chan, M.D. Dear Mayor Metzold: Norman P. Chapel, M.D. I write to you today in support of the Fairview Southdale Hospital project. Minnesota Heart Clinic, Thomas F. Cheng, M.D. a group of' 0 cardiologists headquartered in Edina, has had a long and successful relationship with Candace D. Dick, M.D. Fairview Southdale. We are pleased that Fairview has chosen to make this strategic investment. James W. Erdahl, M.D. The expanded capabilities in the area of cardiovascular services are timely, as they fit the iinmediate Karl W. Foster - Smith, M.D. and long term needs of the residents served by the Edina medical community. Steven M. Heifetz, M.D. Modeled after other cardiovascular centers of excellence, the addition of the integrated care facility Gregory A. Helmer, M.D. creates the clinical space designed around the continuously evolving, technology based procedures. William T. Hession, M.D. We perform tests, treatments and surgeries on patients today which were not available two years Brian H. Ip, M.D. ago, and the exciting aspect of this project is that the newest innovations relative to cardiovascular services, will happen at Fairview Southdale Hospital, in its heart and vascular center of excellence. Maureen A. Kane, M.D. Robert A. Ketroser, M.D. What makes a heart and vascular center of excellence? David D. Laxson, M.D. • The synergistic relationships of the various physician specialists who deliver care to a vascular Adam T. Lonick, M.D. patient. By placing most of those specialists in a single building, a patient's care is coordinated, William B. Nelson, M.D., Ph.D. efficient and of the highest possible quality; coordinated research efforts yield greater results Michael G. Thurmes, M.D. and a true "community" is formed around cardiovascular services. Dennis W.X. Zhu, M.D. • The availability of clinical resources and facilities dedicated to cardiovascular services. The Fairview Southdale Hospital expansion allows for investment around today's patient needs as well as provides flexibility to adapt to future changes. Southdale (612) 924 -9005 Fax (612) 924 -0330 6545 France Ave. South Suite 150 Edina, MN 55435 Other offices in Burnsville, Princeton and Wyoming For appointments at all locations call (612) 915 -2424 • An existing reputation for excellent care, as perceived by the patient, in both the hospital setting and physician's clinic. The Twin Cities metro area is due for such a site and other hospitals are considering a cardiovascular initiative of this nawre. Fairview Southdale's reputation for care and innovation is very high, malting it a logical site for this higher level of service. On behalf of Minnesota Heart Clinic, I encourage you to seize this tremendous opportunity to expand capabilities at the hospital and allow it to continue serving the needs of residents in our communities with the innovation and high quality of care for which it is so well known. Sincerely, W11 EN ��� William T. Hession, M.D. WTH /jms 19002 'i Point of France Association, J�ic- 6566 France Avenue South Edina, Minnesota 55435 925 -2598 The Honorable Dennis Maetzold Edina City Council Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55421 RE: Fairview Hospital's Zoning Approvals Dear Mayor Maetzold: March 28, 2000 I am the Chairman of the Board of Point of France Condominium Association. Recently, the Board reviewed Fairview's expansion plans and the changes to the current zoning controls that Fairview has requested. Our 208 members live literally across the street from the proposed project. Because we are, of course, quite familiar with the area, we thought it would be important to review how the proposed zoning changes would impact the vicinity of the hospital and the city as a whole. We employed an architect and an attorney to help us. We were pleased but not surprised to fmd Fairview very cooperative and forthcoming about their plans. They made the project manager at their architectural firm, Rick Dahl, available to us. We also discussed traffic issues with Robert Cost of BRW. We appreciate Fairview's cooperation. The Point of France Board realizes the importance of Fairview Hospital to the city. And the residents of Point of France consider the hospital to be a great amenity. Fairview is a good neighbor. The Board knows that the hospital must expand. In general, the Board supports Fairview's plans. However, we have a few concerns. We believe some of these concerns should be addressed by conditions to Fairview's Conditional Use Permit ( "C "'Jf'). We believe the following proposed conditions would provide great assurance to the public on the related issues and would not hinder or increase the cost of Fairview's plans. In fact, one of the proposed conditions even saves Fairview money. Exterior surface of parking ramp. Fairview plans to do what is necessary so that its parking ramp will not appear as a massive wall of plain, gray concrete. It will be attractive - as attractive as any around, we are told. But the ramp's exterior architectural design has yet to find expression. This is quite important to us because the proposed structure will dominate some of our views. We strongly suggest that the CUP include a condition that the materials, color, architectural detailing (visual vehicle- screening) and landscaping of the parking ramp all be pre- approved by the city. This issue deserves attention now, rather than later, when it is too late. We think the hospital will complete an attractive structure, but without conditions such as these, it would not be required to. Height of the parking ramp. The hospital is planning to oversize the structural elements of the parking ramp so that additional stories can be added to it in the future. The hospital told us that it expects never to need more than the three stories (4 parking levels) of the ramp as currently planned. The height of the ramp is our greatest concern. Adding levels to the ramp would directly interfere with views from Point of France. The massing, scale and' overall. general appearance of the ramp in its setting would be very different if additional height were added. If no one can foresee needing to add stories to the ramp, then the ramp should not be built to accommodate those stories. This would completely assure Point of France that it will not one day face a Fairview request for permits to add stories to the ramp. What's more, it will save Fairview the cost of over - sizing the construction. Surface water runoff. As we understand it, surface water from the new project - at least some of it -will drain directly into the pond to the West of Point of France. This pond is a major amenity to Point of France and we are concerned. The water should receive some pre - treatment before simply washing into the pond. This is especially critical during construction, of course. Safeguards in these areas should find their, way into CUP conditions, as well. Traffic Concerns. Traffic is horrible. Nothing Fairview plans will make it any better. In fact, all the suggestions Fairview and BRW have made seem to leave traffic improvement up to the city. BRW has made a number of specific proposals. Whatever is necessary to implement these proposals should.be done sooner, rather than later. We are not simply whining here. The current traffic condition is "F." Our residents are prisoners in the building during rush hour. Emergency vehicles cannot reach us then. More importantly, they can't reach the hospital either. The situation is intolerable and unsafe. These zoning approval requests by Fairview are an opportunity to redesign and improve the traffic situation. The BRW suggestions seem like a good start. Skyway. Point of France does not have an interest in promoting or discouraging Fairview's proposed skyway across France Avenue. The skyway sets a precedent for skyways on. France Avenue in Edina. We assume the city will ensure, through appropriate conditions, that the eventual skyway construction will appear as attractive as the drawings. This letter expresses the view of the Point of France Board. However, we have encouraged our residents to come to the hearing on the Fairview zoning approvals, and we hope you will take into consideration any additional concerns or suggestions they may have. Very truly yours, Norbert We ' ger N To the Edina City Council; March 31, 2000 I regret that I can not attend this next council meeting. I would like to express my continued concern that the possible expansion of Fairview Southdale Hospital be thourghly thought out for possible problems with traffic congestion and even possible (probable ?) grid lock. As you know, major traffic problems occur in the hospital vicinity even now without the expansion. I am aware of the proposals to shift traffic patterns but I do not believe they are feasible without major, major reworking of city streets and intersections. In addition, after driving through the area many times since this was discussed at a previous council meeting, it seems to me that major work would need to be done on the exit from eastbound Highway 62 to Valley View. This work probably includes stoplights, widening the exit ramp, and getting permission to back up traffic onto the exit ramp and possibly the freeway should itself. Who is going to pay for this and is it even possible? As a suggestion, (which I understand has already been talked about at the hospital), why not use the Southdale Medical Building and parking areas for Fairview's expansion and move them further down France or wherever. understand this has been considered and they raised the price of their building above market value. If this is true, couldn't the city require them to sell in a similar way as street expansioh or rerouting does. I see several advantages for doing this: i. They already have parking with expansion possibilities. 2. Moving them would reduce their traffic congestion to compensate for Fairview's increase. 3. There is already a tunnel to the hospital 4. A walkway over 65th is about the same distance as a walkway over France to the main hospital. s. Reworking the Valley View exit would not be necessary. Another concern I have is what the proposed rerouting of traffic on Drew Ave. will do to safety and access to the existing offices already there. I believe concrete plans and not we could's are needed before this project should move forward. If you wish to contact me please use my business address and phone number: 2200 West 66t" Street, #Z04, Richfield, MN 55423. 952 - 929 -5245. Sincerely, OV v� Doug Erickson FAIRVIEW SOUTHDALE/ SOUTHDALE MOB TRAFFIC STUDY APPROACH TO TRAFFIC STUDY • Count existing (1999) traffic *Estimate background traffic growth to 2005 • Estimate traffic generated by hospital and Southdale MOB expansions • Analyze traffic operations with and without expansion traffic • Determine need for roadway improvements TRIP GENERATION • Hospital • MOB 55% 45% c PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS LAND USE SIZE (S.F.) INBOUND OUTBOUND TOTAL Fairview Hospital Expansion S outhdale MOB E xpans ion 174,000 60,000 112 106 218 158 330 264 TOTAL 216,000 218 376 594 • Hospital • MOB 55% 45% c • Fairview Southdale • ®BRW I—I..rmmm1 A 0 so 100 200 North Legend: x/y x —Year 2005 PM Peak Hour Site ZO /O Generated Traffic Due to Expansion y —Year 2005 Full PM Peak Hour Post - Expansion Traffic z —Year 2005 Percent Site Generated 15a/3152 Traffic Due to Expansion Q Traffic Signal 5°/O 69/2099 3% 106/2432 4% L� 448/3704 U iL 12% � 0 to IL 175/5287 % 3 °° o Source: BRW, Inc., 2000 289/3490 8 °/O m Fairview O Southdale Medical Center U � , Northco 160/3510 ;r 5% MW 89/2769 3% 88/2749 3% 45/2916 2% 79/2706 3% 106/5491 2% n u m X Southdale Shopping Center � ' \ Fi ure A PM Peak Hour: Expansion Related Traffic vs. Total Traffic Full Post Expansion Conditions — Year 2005 Fairview Southdale• ®BRW�� Legend: teo-t PM Peak Turning Movement Volume 0 Traffic Signal L ource: BRW, Inc., 2000 A 0 50 100 200 North t Close intersection spacing / Lack of stacking distance / Ramp meters Lack o ignalization results in ays for cross street Fairview Southdale Medical L�j " L Center l 1 Ul_ U �I North co L--J MAP - r 1 Southdale Shopping Center � T Existing Traffic Operating Deficiencies m d a' d t! X • Fairview Southdale • ®BRW�� �1 0 50 100 200 North Legend: tgo.t PM Peak Turning Movement Volume 0 Traffic Signal Additional traffic will warrant signalization 0 f!1 Source: BRW, Inc., 2000 Close intersection spacing / Lack of stacking distance / Ramp meters . Fairview Southdale Medical Center l 1 Uu Northco 1,—J "Lack o ignalization results in ays for cross street tr is Southdale Shopping Center Future Traffic Operating Deficiencies 01 a C X • Fairview Southdale a New signal timing plans for all traffic signals, existing and proposed ®BRW New guide signs directing eastbound hospital traffic to exit at Valleyview Rd I"L1�1 A 0 70 too No North Legend: OExisting Key Intersection — Signalized Existing Key Intersection — Unsignalized Install traffic signal Install traffic signal and reconfigure intersection geometry to allow through and left -turn momements on all 4 approaches L �o Source: BRW, Inc., 2000 t 0 41 0 Y Fairview Southdale Medical �^ Center rn oil a] ��A i'% 11 l� J ;O1 Widen Drew Ave to 40' to accomodate 3 lanes Southdale Shopping Center New guide signs directing westbound hospital traffic to exit at Xerxes Ave. r s oil Y Q a Figure 10 Proposed Hospital - Related Mitigation Measures FAIRVIEW SOUTHDALE HOSPITAL EXPANSION 100 o 100 X TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY 5CO1e feet FIGURE A EXISTING AND PROPOSED CONFIGURATION ALONG VALLEYVIEW ROAD TRAFFIC SIGNAL �� FAIRVIEW Fairview Southdale Hospital service • integrity 1 compassion OV 4 � Q a w FAIL Site Plan o0,11 Gg0 Lr IMAGING I MRI ` F,41i \ \/IELU 50AHpALE 05FITAL WEST 65TH STREET SGALE: I"=40'-O" 0 40•0" W'-0" - -- 1%%ii ewes Archit-t. t,�` 1' �,�`t.\,``t,��, �,,,• WEST 657H STREET service • integrity 1 compassion OV 4 � Q a w FAIL Site Plan o0,11 Gg0 Lr IMAGING I MRI ` F,41i \ \/IELU 50AHpALE 05FITAL WEST 65TH STREET SGALE: I"=40'-O" 0 40•0" W'-0" - -- 1%%ii ewes Archit-t. FAIRVIEW Fairview Southdale Hospital -, - " N�� First Level Plan i • service • integrity • compassion �5� SCALE: I"= zm'-O" Master Building Plans 0 20'-0Y 40'-m' cu FAIRVIEW Fairview Southdale Hospital Lower Level Plan V • service • integrity • compassion Master Building Plans 9CALE:1 ":20' -0" MAIr RWRR AmMI1�b 00 FAIRVIEW Fairview Southdale Hospital Second Level Plan • service • integrity • compassion Master Buildinq Plans SCALE_ 1"= 20'-O" swan A.cmuen 0 10'-0" 40.0 0� FAIRVIE) Fairview 5 Typical Third & Fourth Level Plans i • service • integrity • compassion Master Buildinq Plans SCALE: P =20' -0" 1`1r 8WB8 Archil �ctc 0 10' -0. 40' -0° N L! MIN IN First Level Plan dignity • service • integrity • compassion .r J:I 1-111 { ; FT EMER E WY LAS AMIN . 1 • • SPEC 7ER I IL I Ill 1 1-. . "T*N SAME DAY SLVIGMY THERAPY ' rp SCALE: V' =20-0° ♦%Nf •w•n A,ce t.ea. Phase One Building Plans 0� FM RN IEW Fairview Southdale Hospital Lower Level Plan V • service • integrity • compassion Phase One Building Plans a 0 ewex A. <nn.«. 0 10' -0. 40' -0' L" FAIRVIEW Fairview Southdale Hospital service • integrity • compassion MA dp swan A,,n . 00 FAIRVIEW EW Fairview Southdale Hospital service • integrity • compassion ff 3 1L1f' ewers A,thluet. Do FAIRVIEW Fairview Southdale Hospital service • integrity • compassion THE CROSSINGS - SECOND LEVEL MKI1r BWUI Anhlt�t. � j FAIRVIEW Fairview Southdale Hospital service • integrity • compassion THE CROSSINGS - LOWER LEVEL LOOKING EAST 1%1r OWSR A.hNwb 00 FAIRVIEW Fairview Southdale Hospital service • integrity • compassion AERIAL CAMPUS VIEW LOOKING NORTH (LANDSCAPING NOT SHOWN) %1r swan AMehneete n 3 EXISTING PARKING LOT— PROPOSED RING ROAD— .................... NIEMEN sz, WATCHING INDICATES PAVEMENT CONVERTED GWENSPACIE Lu PARKING RAMP Lu u- rt.\ SITE PLAN COMPARI&M 5 a WATCWIWs INDICATES GREENSPACE CONVERTED." TO PAVEMENT 'I REENSPAGE: UEST OF FRANCE EAST OF F --------- 30631 SF NET GAIN 5449 F NET I 5 FT- FAIRVIEW SOUTHDALE MEDICAL CAMPUS EXPANSION BWOR ARCHITECTS 400 Sibley Street, Suits 500 Met, Paul. Mi.....t. 55101 651-222-3701 0— er dum cpc no sr ew EXfffM V8 0 am FILM COMPAIMI P.k 1002 01 0 FAIRVIEW Fairview Southdale Hospital Nab * 44 - T, E• -� �_ ,,fi�tt '{ - ►t:_... service • integrity • compassion VIEW OF SOUTH EAST CORNER OF RAMP FROM 65TH 1%1r swee erehn «n Fairview Southdale Hospital T i f "GATEWAY" SKYWAY AND INTEGRATED CARE FACILITY LOOKING NORTH ON FRANCE AVENUE dignity • service • integrity • compassion 1%1r BWBM Amhftws �� FAIRVIEW Fairview Southdale Hospital l.. S� J_•3e aJ - - t• ��'it,�t`i• ' %jam r i 3 � � � *�•- � " - jig ,_^t: �. ��` `•-tr 7J _ � _ - _ _ yy ttyy r � ; L I 1 L i `�� raw _ • • service • integrity • compassion 'r f ..,rte _. �` �`_ ".�'� �?�L€��o• VIEW OF SOUTH SIDE OF RAMP AND LANDSCAPING N"r �AMM"W 01 � FA IRV IE W Fairview Southdale Hospital %"f .VM AION"% Fairview Southdale Hospital swan Rrchft «n MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Gordon L. Hughes, City Manager FROM: Jerry Gilligan DATE: March 30, 2000 RE: Enactment of Moratorium At the City Council meeting on March 2155 there was a discussion about the City undertaking a study.of the Southdale shopping center and certain adjacent properties and while such study is underway imposing a moratorium on certain types of new development in the study area. Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.355, subdivision 4, authorizes the City to enact an interim ordinance which may regulate, restrict or prohibit any use, development or subdivision within the City or a portion thereof if it is conducting a study or has authorized a study or is considering amendment to its compensation plan or zoning subdivision ordinance. The interim ordinance may regulate, restrict or prohibit any use, development or subdivision for a period not to exceed one year from the effective date of the ordinance, and the ordinance may be extended for such additional periods as the City may deem appropriate, not exceeding a total additional period of 18 months. The purpose of permitting cities to adopt an interim ordinance which imposes a moratorium while it is conducting a study or considering zoning or subdivision ordinance amendments is to protect the planning process and the health, safety and welfare of its citizens. Minnesota courts have held that a city may not enact an interi m ordinance imposing a moratorium for the purpose of delaying or preventing a single project. If a moratorium is imposed on certain types of development it should be applicable to all similarly situated property. If the City Council determines to authorize a study, and while the study is being conducted impose a moratorium on certain types of new development in the study area, I would recommend that the Council authorize the study by the adoption of a resolution and then enact an interim ordinance under Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.355, subdivision 4, imposing the moratorium. The adoption of the interim ordinance does not require a public hearing or any prior public notice, and it may be adopted by a majority vote of the Council. JPG:cmn I 'e Memo To: Gordon Hughes Fronx Craig Larsen Date: March 30, 2000 Re: Possible new medical office building development near Fairview Hospital Over the past year, or more I have met with several property owners in this area to explore the possibility of adding additional office space on their properties. All of the owners are planning to market the space for medical tenants. All properties are located in the area south of 65' Street, north of 66"' Street, east of France and west of York Avenue. This area contains properties zoned Regional Medical, and Planned Office District. All districts allow medical office uses. The main difference between the districts is the development intensity allowed. Regional Medical allows a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 1.0, while Planned Office allows a FAR of ) 0.5. The hospital, Southdale Medical, and the buildings fronting on Drew Avenue are zoned Regional Medical and balance of the property is zoned Planned Office. ( See attached air photo ) In addition to the medical office space in the hospital proposal, the owner of the buildings at 3250 W. 66"' Street and 6550 York, Eberhardt Properties, has submitted plans for a 33,000 square foot addition to the 3250 building. The proposal was reviewed by the Planning. Commission on, March 29,2000. The proposed site plan is attached to this memo. I have also had discussions with the owners of Southdale Medical (6545 France), and the owners of Southdale Place (3400 W. 661i Street) concerning new or expanded buildings on their respective properties. Southdale Medical has a plan for a 65,000 square foot addition. Southdale Place would add a new building, fronting on .65th Street, with a floor area of about 40,000 square feet. No plans for these projects have been submitted. • Page 1 . -.0 FOOT PARKING SETBACK 25.0 FOOT PROPOSED SETBACK PROPOSED NEW TREES 10.0 FOOT PARXMQ PROPERTY lJNE MURE OF DECIDUOUS AND CONIFEROUS PHYSICIAN PARKING 0 NJ! lo.i =F01 T P POST. - PROPOSED M. NEW TREES C2 iv-�Kw WX BUILDIN K UNE EQUAL TO EIG OF BUILDIN 20.0 FPOT,-ARKING SETBACK lul PROPERTY LIKE PROPERI LINE 0 2 0* t!� Consent Item III.E. LOC A'TION MAP. [41 ,57 '1.97 165.3 yes!' 0 267. 9y 567'5!':6'■ � � 22. i !16. 56 !I 500= A5001 6645 5 0 0 1 ., A 18 CC (52) 3t b 17 f a�) (48) W (>60 126 56 (`3) 32. 37 5005 = �� OO,.s of 5004 _ (ss) ' (46) ��$ (49) - _ = 26. SS 132 37 I r (26) 26. s W Ln ,SOO$ 0 5009 w (45) a 5008 Y. (54) f--- ( 150) 126.55 A _ S504 .... �..... �5 01,E (44) 9 r 5 012-8 - 5.0 - -s!' !6•. „ ,,p s 2 � 1. 30.52. %. (43) ,st•6 A. 021 �. LOT D NUMBER LD -00 -5 LOCATION 5000 and 5004 Kelsey Terrace EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT L DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES MARCH 29, 2000 LD -00 -5 Carl Hansen Parkwood Knolls Construction Company 5000 & 5004 Kelsey Terrace Mr. Larsen informed the Commission the proposed lot division involves two single dwelling lots in the developing section of Parkwood Knolls. A new dwelling is under construction on the lot at the corner of Kelsey Terrace and Interlachen Boulevard. The, adjacent lot is vacant and is owned by the owner of the new house. The division would move the common lot line about 10 feet to the north. Both lots would continue to conform to Zoning_ Ordinance requirements. Mr. Larsen concluded staff recommends approval of the division. Commissioner Lonsbury moved to recommend lot division approval. Commissioner Ingwals,on seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 29, 2000 STAFF REPORT LD -00 -5 Carl Hansen Parkwood Knolls Construction Company 5000 Kelsey Terrace The proposed lot division involves 2 single dwelling lots in the developing section of Parkwood Knolls. A new dwelling is under construction on the lot at the corner of Kelsey Terrace and Interlachen Boulevard. The adjacent lot is vacant and is owned by the owner of the new house. The division would move the common lot line about 10 feet to the north. Both lots would continue to conform to Zoning Ordinance requirements. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the division. r Application for lot Division continued. 5000 Kelsey Terrace Dr. Eric and Bernadette Flores are purchasing the home at 5000 Kelsey Terrace. along with the adjacent lot. The home is being built in the Feung Sheui design in order to facilitate health and fortunate living. The laws of this pliilosophy.(according to their advisor in the Philippines) require the lots to be of equal size. The currently have no..plan of building on the lot and plan to leave it as a buffer next to their home. TMs may sound a little strange, but it is very important to the Flores' and should not affect any adjacent property. I v co N I �. v N_ Is � I N I00 � I O L _ N00017'11 "W 241.15 - -- o 109.08 132.07 -- ' y - - - - -, - -- U - -a-� z �'; � co .�a Z . .� _ - }._ ,�� -►� 1,5- 40 44 Z Q 00 i DEpc 79. i R1 - - -- 0) _ a m z 152. �+ N '" \ PROPOSED BUILDING 14.5 I I Un 'o 00*91 58.67 986.6eo•oz ,aa - - -- 66. - -- ---- ,� ,ias , sass 0 5I $� STOOP cp 112.67 — — — -� — — — 132.07 � - -_��� „ A S00°17'11 "E 244.74 —W « 1S' RCP STORY SEWER � « � « 8' PVC SANITARY SEWER E ° A ZE EY W e DIP wATERMAIN W�Y' "�i W- i l� 0 Y9�V �) • �, V . 88a i REPORT/REC OMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: GORDON L. HUGHES CITY MANAGER Date: APRIL 4, 2000 Subject: TRANSFER OF CONTROL - TIME WARNER CABLE RECOMMENDATION: Conduct public hearing. INFO/BACKGROUND: Agenda Item IV. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance - - -®_Discussion On April 4, 2000, the Council will conduct a public hearing with respect to the proposed transfer of control for Time Warner Cable. The attached report from Brian Grogan, Attorney for the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission summarizes the issues with respect to this transfer. Mr. Grogan will be present at the hearing to answer questions. SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CABLE COMMISSION c/o Moss & Barnett, A Professional Association 4800 Norwest Center, 90 South Seventh Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 Phone: (612) 347 -0349 Fax: (612) 339 -6686 March 22, 2000 VIA U.S. MAIL Mr. Gordon Hughes City Manager City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Proposed Transfer of Control of Cable Television Franchisee Dear Gordon: Enclosed herewith please find Moss & Barnett's report regarding the proposed transfer of control of the parent company of KBL Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc., the City's present cable television franchisee. I will be present at the City's public hearing on Tuesday, April 4, 2000 at which time I will be prepared to make a brief presentation regarding the report and to respond to questions from City officials. Upon closing of the public hearing the City will have the option to take action on the recommended resolution or to delay action for up to thirty (30) days as permitted under Minnesota statutes. If you have any questions or if I can provide any additional information, please feel free to contact me. Very truly yours, � . Brian T. Grogan BTG /tlh Enclosure cc: Kim Roden (w /enclosure via U.S. Mail) John Gibbs (w /enclosure via U.S. Mail) 322869/1 Report to the City of Edina, Minnesota Regarding the Proposed Transfer of Control of the City's Cable Television. Franchisee to AOL Time Warner, Inc. March 22, 2000 Prepared by: Brian T. Grogan, Esq. Timothy L. Gustin, Esq. Michael R. Nixt, Esq. MOSS & BARNETT ''A Professional Association 4800 Norwest Center 90 South Seventh Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 -4129 (612) 347 -0340 phone (612) 339 -6686 facsimile GroganB @moss - barnett.com 322801/1 I . Report to the City of Edina, Minnesota Regarding the Proposed Transfer of Control of the City's Cable Television Franchisee to AOL Time Warner, Inc. March 22, 2000 Table of Contents Introduction...................................................................................... ..............................1 Applicable Law ............................ ...2 ................................................ ........................:...... Description of Transfer of Control ... ........:...... ...7 ........................... ............................... Chart Demonstrating Proposed Merger ......................................... ..............................8 LegalQualifications ........................................................................ ..............................9 Technical Qualifications ................................................................ .............................10 FinancialQualifications ................................................................. .............................12 Open Access Considerations ......................................................... ............................15. Recommendations Exhibit A. Resolution - Approving Transfer 322801/1 Introduction The City of Edina, Minnesota ( "City ") has before it a request from its cable television franchisee, KBL Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc. ( "Franchisee "), to approve a proposed transfer of control of the Franchisee resulting from the merger of to- be- formed subsidiaries of the existing parent corporation of Franchisee, Time Warner Inc. ( "TWI "), and America Online, Inc. ( "AOL ") into a new company and ultimate parent of Franchisee called AOL Time Warner, Inc. ( "AOL Time Warner"). The merger does not involve the sale or transfer of the cable system operated by Franchisee or of the Franchisee itself. Therefore, the request before the City does not involve a transfer or assignment of the franchise operated by Franchisee ( "Franchise "), but instead a transfer of control of the Franchisee. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 238.083 and the Franchise at Section 25, the proposed transfer of control is prohibited without the written consent of the City. In light of the request by the Franchisee and the procedural requirements of Minn. Stat. Section 238.083 and Section 25 of the Franchise, Moss & Barnett, A Professional Association, has been retained by the City and was asked .to provide this Report. This Report will provide.the City with an analysis of the transfer of control and will provide recommendations to the City. In preparing this Report, Moss & Barnett has relied upon information submitted by TWI and AOL including: 1. FCC Form 394 - Application for Franchise Authority Consent to Assignment or Transfer of Control of Cable Television Franchise dated February 11, 2000, received by the City on or about February 18, 2000, including all attachments thereto. 2. The financial information referenced in the Financial Qualifications section of this Report. 3. Agreement and Plan of Merger between AOL and TWI dated as of January 10, 2000, with certain exhibits and schedules redacted for reasons of confidentiality. The Report has been prepared with Brian T.'Grogan serving as project manager, Timothy L. Gustin.assisting with due diligence and document preparation, and Michael R. Nixt, who is a former CPA with Coopers & Lybrand; performing the financial review of AOL, TWI, and AOL Time Warner. 322801/1 Applicable Law The following provisions of federal law, state law, and the Franchise govern the actions of the City in acting on the request of TWI and AOL for approval of the transfer of control. FEDERAL LAW The Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984, as amended by the Cable Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992 and the Telecommunications Act of 1996 ( "Cable Act "), provides at Section 617 (47 U.S.C. § 537): Sales of Cable Systems A franchising authority shall, if the franchise requires franchising authority approval of a sale or transfer, have 120 days to act upon any request for approval of such sale or transfer that contains or is accompanied by such information as is required in accordance with Commission regulations and by the franchising authority. If the franchising authority fails to render a final decision on the request within 120 days, such request shall be deemed granted un less the requesting party and the franchising authority agree to an extension of time. The Cable Act also provides at Section 613d (47 U.S.C. § 533d) as follows: (d) Regulation of ownership by States or franchising authorities Any State or franchising authority may not prohibit the ownership or control of a cable system by any person because of such person's ownership or control of any other media of mass communications or other media interests. Nothing in this section shall be construed to prevent any State or franchising authority from prohibiting the ownership or control of a cable system in a jurisdiction by any person (1) because of such person's ownership or control of any other cable system in such jurisdiction, or (2) in circumstances in which the State or franchising authority determines that the acquisition of such a cable system may eliminate or reduce competition in the delivery of cable service in such jurisdiction. Further, the Federal Communications Commission ( "FCC ") has promulgated regulations governing the sale of cable systems. Section 76.502 of the FCC's regulations (47 C.F.R. § 76.502) provides: 322801/1 2 47 C.F.R. § 76.502 Time Limits Applicable to Franchise Authority Consideration of Transfer Applications (a) A franchise authority shall have 120 days from the date of submission of a completed FCC Form 394, together with all exhibits, and any additional information required by the terms of the franchise agreement or applicable state or local law to act upon an application to sell, assign, or otherwise transfer controlling ownership of a cable system.. (b) A franchise authority that questions the accuracy of the information provided under paragraph (a) must notify the cable operator within 30 days of the filing of such information, or such information shall be deemed accepted, unless the cable operator has failed to provide any additional information reasonably requested by the franchise authority within 10 days of such request. (c) If the franchise authority fails to act upon such transfer request within 120 days, such request shall be deemed granted unless the franchise authority and the requesting party otherwise agree to an extension of time. STATE LAW Minnesota Statutes Section 238.083 Sale or Transfer of Franchise provides: Subd. 1. Fundamental corporate change defined. For purposes of this section, "fundamental corporate change" means the sale or transfer of a majority of a corporation's assets; merger, including a parent and its subsidiary corporation; consolidation or creation of a subsidiary corporation. Subd. 2. Written approval of franchising authority. A sale or transfer of a franchise, including a sale or transfer by means of a fundamental corporate change, requires the written approval of the franchising authority. The parties to ,the sale or transfer of a franchise shall make a written request to the franchising authority for its approval of the sale or transfer. The franchising authority shall reply, in writing, within 30 days of the request and shall indicate its approval of the request or its determination that a public hearing is necessary if it determines that a sale or transfer of a franchise may adversely affect the company's subscribers. The franchising authority shall conduct a public hearing on the request within 30 days of that determination. Subd. 3. Notice of hearing. Un less otherwise already provided for by local law, notice of the hearing must be given 14 days before the hearing by publishing notice of it once in a newspaper of general circulation in the area being served by the 322801/1 3 franchise. The notice must contain the date, time, and place of the hearing and must briefly state the substance of the action to be considered by the franchising authority. Subd. 4. Approval or denial of sale or transfer request. Within 30 days after the public hearing, the franchising authority shall approve or deny, in writing, the sale or transfer request. The approval must not be unreasonably withheld. Subd. 5. Sale or transfer of franchise without system. The parties to the sale or transfer of a franchise only, without the inclusion of a cable communications system in which at least substantial construction has commenced, shall establish that the sale or transfer of only the franchise will be in the public interest. Subd. 6. Sale or transfer of stock. Sale or transfer of stock in a corporation so as to create, a new controlling interest in a cable communications system is subject to the requirements of this section. The term "controlling interest, "as used herein, is not limited to majority stock ownership, but includes actual working control in whatever manner exercised. LOCAL LAW The Franchise at Section 25. Transfer of Ownership provides: A. A Franchise shall not be assigned or transferred, either in whole or in part, or leased, sublet or mortgaged in any manner, nor shall title thereto, either legal or equitable or any right, interest or property therein, pass to or vest in any person other than an Affiliate of Grantee without the prior written consent of City, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. Further, Grantee shall not sell or transfer any stock or ownership interest so as to create a new controlling interest except with the consent of City, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. B. Any sale or transfer of Franchise, including a sale or transfer by means of a fundamental corporate change, requires the written approval of City. The parties to the sale or transfer of Franchise shall make a written request to City for its consent. City shall reply in writing within 30 days of actual receipt of the request and shall indicate its approval of the request or its determination that a public hearing is necessary. City shall conduct a public hearing on the request within 30 days of such determination if it determines that a sale or transfer of Franchise may adversely affect the Grantee's subscribers. C. Unless otherwise already provided for by local law, notice of any such hearing shall be given 14 days prior to the hearing by publishing notice thereof once in a newspaper of general circulation in the City. The notice 322801/1 4 shall contain the date, time and place of the hearing and shall briefly state the substance of the action to be considered by City. Within 30 days after the public hearing, City shall approve or deny in writing the sale or.transfer request. D. In a sale or transfer of only a Franchise, without the inclusion of the System in which at. least substantial initial construction has commenced, a Grantee shall be required to establish to a sole satisfaction of City that the sale or transfer of a Franchise is in the public interest. E. For purposes of this section, fundamental corporate change means the sale or transfer of a controlling interest in the stock of a corporation or the sale or transfer of all or a majority of a corporation's assets, merger (including a parent and its subsidiary corporation), consolidation, or creation of a subsidiary corporation. For the purposes of this Section, fundamental partnership change means the sale or transfer of all or a majority of a partnership's assets, change of a general partner in a limited partnership, change from a limited to a general partnership, incorporation of a partnership, or change in the control of partnership. F. The word "control; as used herein, shall apply to the sale or transfer of all or a majority of Grantee's assets or shares of stock, merger (including any parent and its subsidiary corporation), consolidation, creation of a , subsidiary corporation of the parent company, or sale or transfer of stock in Grantee so as to.create a new controlling interest. The term "controlling interest" as used herein is not limited to majority stock ownership, but includes. actual working control in whatever manner exercised, including the creation or transfer of decision - making authority to a new or different board of directors. Every change, transfer or acquisition of control of a Grantee shall make the Franchise subject to cancellation un less and until City shall have consented in writing thereto, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. For the purpose of determining whether it shall consent to such change, transfer or acquisition of control, City may inquire into the qualifications of the prospective controlling party. The City reserves the right to seek reimbursement of its, costs for conducting an inquiry to the extent permitted by applicable state and federal law. The preceding statement does not constitute an agreement by any party to reimburse the City. G. In no event shall a transfer or assignment of ownership or control be approved without transferee becoming a signatory to a Franchise. H. Any transferee of a Franchise shall be subordinate to any right, title or interest of City. 322801/1 5 1 l: For information on the right of the City to purchase the cable system during a transfer.of ownership, see Section 26, J. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary, no such consent or approval shall be required for a transfer or assignment to any Person controlling, controlled by or under the same common. control as the Grantee. 322801/1 6 Description of Transfer of Control On January 10, 2000, an Agreement of Plan and Merger ( "Merger Agreement ") was entered into between America Online, Inc., a Delaware corporation ( "AOL "), and Time Warner Inc., a Delaware corporation ( "TWI "). The Merger Agreement contemplates the two existing parent corporations, AOL and TWI to merge and become wholly -owned subsidiaries of a to -be- formed and ultimate parent called AOL Time Warner, Inc. ( "AOL Time Warner"). To that end, AOL Time Warner will first form two new subsidiaries, referred to in the Merger Agreement as "AOL Merger Sub" and "Time Warner Merger Sub ". The Merger Subs are to be formed solely for the purpose of effectuating the merger. AOL will merge into the AOL Merger Sub, with the AOL Merger Sub ceasing to exist as an operation of law. TWI will merge into the Time Warner Merger Sub, with the Time Warner Merger Sub ceasing to exist as an operation of law. AOL and TWI, as merged with the Merger Subs, will become wholly -owned subsidiaries of the new parent and holding company, AOL Time Warner. The Merger Subs will be corporations organized under the laws of Delaware and will presumably be renamed upon incorporation. Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of AOL and TWI will be exchanged and converted into shares of capital stock of AOL Time Warner with virtually identical rights and preferences. This includes all series and classes of both AOL and TWI. The Merger Agreement establishes the conversion ratio for each of the series and specific classes of capital stock. The Franchisee is the operating subsidiary currently holding the Franchise and operating the cable television system within the City. Upon consummation of the merger, the Franchisee will remain unchanged. It will continue to hold the Franchise and operate the cable system. There will be no sale or assignment of the Franchisee or the system it operates. There will, however, be a change in the parent corporation that controls the Franchisee. As such, the request of TWI is to authorize the change of control of the Franchisee, not a change of ownership of the cable television system. To better understand the proposed merger, a corporate chart has been provided on the following page. 322801/1 7 Chart Demonstrating Proposed Merger Before the merger, Time Warner Inc. and America Online, Inc. are separate and unrelated corporate utilities. Time Warner Inc. America Online, Inc. Time Warner Inc. merges into Time Warner Merger Sub with Time Warner Inc. surviving the merger (to be renamed at a later date) and Time Warner Merger Sub ceasing to exist. Time Warner Time Warner Time Warner Inc. Merger Sub 1- Inc. America Online, Inc. merges into AOL Merger Sub with America Online, Inc. surviving the merger (to be renamed at a later date) and AOL Merger Sub ceasing to exist. America Online, AOL Merger Sub America Online, Inc. + Inc. A new holding company, AOL Time Warner, Inc., serves as parent of the two wholly -owned subsidiaries, Time Warner Inc. and America Online, Inc. AOL Time Warner, Inc. Time America Warner Inc. Online, Inc. Time Warner cable remains the cable management arm for the new parent, AOL Time Warner, Inc., and the City's Franchisee, will remain unchanged. AOL Time I Warner, Inc. Time Warner, Inc. Time Warner Cable Franchisee 322801/1 8 America Online, Inc. Legal Qualifications The legal qualifications standard relates primarily to an analysis of whether the Franchisee, as controlled by AOL Time Warner, will remain duly organized and authorized to operate the cable television system under the terms of the Franchise. The applicable standard of review is that the City's consent shall not be unreasonably withheld.' The proposed transferee, AOL Time Warner, is a corporation that was incorporated under the laws of Delaware on February 7, 2000. It will not commence business operations until consummation of the proposed transaction. As such, it has not had an application for a cable television franchise transfer or renewal dismissed or denied by any franchise authority. As the parent of the Franchisee, AOL Time Warner need not be qualified to do business in the state where the City and the system used by the Franchisee are located. TWI has stipulated that it is aware of no instance in which Time Warner Cable, the management arm of TWI, or any of its affiliates has been denied renewal of a cable television franchise. In only two instances were applications for a consent to transfer a franchise denied, both involving a transfer from Time Warner Entertainment Company, L.P. ( "TWE ") to an affiliated entity, Time Warner Entertainment Advance /Newhouse Partnership. Certain issues of dispute remain unresolved. In both situations, TWE continues to hold the franchise and operate the system pending authorization of the proposed transfers. Under the Merger Agreement, the Franchisee will remain the holder of the Franchise and will continue to operate the cable television system in the City. We therefore focus our analysis on the Franchisee and its pertinent legal qualifications. The Franchisee is currently registered and authorized to conduct business in the State of Minnesota. TWI has stipulated that the Franchisee, as the legal entity that operates the City's cable system, will not change and that the Franchisee will continue to be duly qualified to transact business in said State. To confirm this is the case, a certificate of good standing was obtained 'from the Secretary of State, and according to the certificate, the Franchisee currently is in good standing to conduct business and operate the system in the City. Based on the foregoing, we conclude it would be unreasonable for the City to find that upon closing of the transaction contemplated under the Merger Agreement, the Franchisee, as controlled by AOL Time Warner, will not be legally qualified. ' See Minn. Stat. Section 238.083. 322801/1 9 Technical Qualifications The technical qualifications standard relates to the technical expertise and experience of the Franchisee, as controlled by TWI America Online, to operate and maintain a cable television system under the Franchise. In such a review, the standard is once again that the City's consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. 2 As stated, the Franchisee will remain unchanged, and with that, TWI has stipulated that the local management and staff will remain the same. The local management and staff will continue to report to the same executives of Time Warner Cable, which is the cable management arm of the existing and ultimate parent of the Franchisee, TWI. Assuming this is true, the City should be unaffected by the merger and resulting transfer of control. For example, customer service issues will be directed to the same personnel as before the transfer, and the same level of service at the local level should be provided. What begs the question, however, is the reason why AOL and TWI would merge and create a new parent if subscribers would experience no change. True, decisions may happen at the upper management level, making it appear that the City and its subscribers will go unaffected, but such decisions will have to be implemented at the local level. With such a monumental merger of media and information companies, there is reason to believe that the City may see some changes at the local level, whether AOL and TWI anticipate them at this point or not. Currently, Time Warner Cable or its affiliates manage cable systems serving a total of approximately 12.6 million cable subscribers, geographically concentrated in 35 groupings of more than 100,000 subscribers each. It boasts being "one of the largest and most experienced multiple system cable operators in the United States." Now, with the proposed merger with AOL, Time Warner Cable will undoubtedly manage many more subscribers with new issues, many of which may relate to Internet service over the cable system. This is likely, considering the incredible presence AOL has over the Internet and the future offering of its Internet service over existing TWI cable systems. Although the possible benefits of the merger abound, so do the possible strains on management, namely Time Warner Cable. TWI states that it is committed to giving its customers not only an array of entertainment and information choices, but also high quality service. In its efforts to provide the former, the latter may suffer. Local personnel may have every good intention to continue to provide quality service to the City and its subscribers, but strain on upper level management may filter down to the local level, creating confusion and inefficiency. We remain optimistic, however, that the merger, by combining the strengths of the cable and Internet industry, will provide subscribers with countless benefits. 2 See Minn. Stat. Section 238.083. 322801/1 10 Particularly, Internet service over cable systems which -is many times faster than traditional service over telephone lines, even telephones lines with digital subscriber line ( "DSL ") service. Despite such optimism and as previously stated, we remain concerned that management will be strained as a result of this mega- merger, such strain particularly felt by Time Warner Cable. Based on the foregoing, we conclude it would be unreasonable for the City to find that upon closing of the transaction contemplated under the Merger. Agreement, the Franchisee, as controlled by AOL Time Warner, will not be technically qualified. 322801/1 11 Financial Qualifications OVERVIEW AND SCOPE OF ANALYSIS The following is a summary of our analysis of selected financial information provided by Time Warner, Inc., a Delaware corporation ( "Time Warner") in conjunction with Time Warner's request for. consent to the change in control of a television cable system ( "System ") serving the City which will occur as the result of the merger of Time Warner and America Online, Inc., a Delaware corporation ( "AOL ") (the "Merger'). The selected financial information to which our review has been limited, consists solely of the following (collective, the "Financial Statements "): Time Warner Form 10 -K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998; 2. Time Warner Form 10 -Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 1999; 3. AOL Form 10 -K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998; and 4. AOL Form 10Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 1999 Our procedure is limited to providing a summary of our analysis of the Financial Statements and other relevant information to facilitate the City's assessment of the financial capabilities of AOL Time Warner, Inc., a Delaware corporation to be.formed to consummate the Merger, to become the ultimate parent and successor operator of the System serving the City. SUMMARY OF TRANSACTION Time Warner and AOL entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger dated January 10, 2000 (the "Merger Agreement ") pursuant to which AOL and Time Warner established the terms and conditions whereby both AOL and Time Warner would become, wholly -owned subsidiaries of AOL Time Warner, Inc., a Delaware corporation to be formed ( "AOL Time Warner"). The Merger is to be accomplished by AOL and Time Warner causing AOL Time Warner to form two wholly -owned subsidiaries, "AOL Merger Sub" and "Time Warner Merger Sub." AOL would merge AOL Merger Sub into itself and Time Warner would merge Time Warner Merger Sub into itself.. Immediately following the mergers of the foregoing described Constituent Corporations, AOL and Time Warner would become wholly -owned subsidiaries of AOL Time Warner. In accordance with the provisions of the Merger Agreement, all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of all series and classes of each of AOL and Time Warner would be exchanged and converted into shares of capital stock of AOL Time Warner with virtually identical rights and preferences. The Merger Agreement establishes the conversion ratio for each of the specific classes and series of capital stock. 322801/1 12 As a result of the Merger, the Time Warner operating subsidiary that currently holds the franchise to operate the System in the City will continue to hold the cable franchise notwithstanding the Merger. As such, the request of Time Warner is to authorize the change of control, not change of ownership of the System. COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF PRO FORMA FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Neither federal law nor FCC regulations provide franchising authorities with any guidance concerning evaluation of the financial qualifications of an applicant for a cable franchise. In certain circumstances, it is appropriate to consider the performance of an applicant based on the applicant's historical performance in relation to recognized industry standards. Given the fact that Time Warner, through its operating entities, has a history of cable system operations, such statistical analysis is relevant with respect to the Time Warner's historical operations. We have based our analysis, in part, on industry standards which are generally recognized in making such a determination. These industry standards are more precisely described below.3 Based on the selected pro forma financial information which we analyzed, the following is a summary of the various financial factors, as compared to the applicable Industry Standards, for the 9 -month period ended September 30, 1999 and the 12- month periods ended December 31, 1998 and 1997. Operating Ratio 60% or less 59.0% 56.3% (op-expense/revenue) Operating Margin 40% or more 41.0% 43.7% (op-profit/revenue) Pretax profit Margin +10% or more 3.0% 4.2% (pretax income /revenue Debt/Equity Ratio 2.2:1 2.03:1 1.23:1 (long -term debt/total equity) Current Ratio 1.0:1 1.00:1 1.18:1 (current assets /current liabilities Operating Cash Flow N/A $4.9 Billion $2.2 Billion EBITDA EBITDA Margin 24.0% 25.2% 15.3% (operating cash flow /revenue AOL FINANCIAL OVERVIEW Based on information contained in the AOL 1999 annual report, for the 12 months ending June 30, 1999, AOL had total revenues of $4.8 billion, operating income 3 Industry data based on information compiled by Paul Kagan and Associates. 322801/1 13 of $578.0 million and net income of $396.0 million, resulting in earnings per share of $.34. During fiscal 1999, AOL's membership grew from 12.5 million to 17.6 million or approximately 41 %. As of September 30, 1999, AOL had total current assets of $2.4 billion, total assets of $6.5 billion, total current liabilities of $2.0 billion, total liabilities of $2.7 billion and total stockholders equity of $3.8 billion. For the three months ended September 30, 1999, AOL EBITDA increased from $153 million to $386 million or 152% over the three months ended September 30, 1998. EBITDA margin increased from 15.3% for the three month ending September 30, 1998 to 26.3% for the three months ended September 30, 1999, with an incremental EBITDA margin of approximately 50.0 %. AOL's net worth' and historical results from operations, although not necessarily indicative of future performance, do support the position that AOL, as a subsidiary of AOL Time Warner, will not have a materially adverse impact on the overall operating results from a financial standpoint due to the shifting of resources from Time Warner to AOL for the sole purpose of funding AOL's ongoing operations and working capital needs. In addition, based on AOL's historical results, it is also not unreasonable to conclude that the historical financial results of operations of AOL may, under certain circumstances, be available to fund the ongoing operations of Time Warner, including providing working capital. SUMMARY Based on the foregoing. and limited strictly the Financial Statements, we do not believe that Time Warner's request for transfer of control of the franchise to operate the System can reasonably be denied based solely on lack of financial capabilities. This statement should not be construed in any way to constitute an opinion as to the financial capability of Time Warner, AOL or AOL Time Warner either individually or jointly to operate the existing System serving the'City or to successfully consummate the transaction contemplated by the Merger and to successfully incorporate the operation of the existing System and Time Warner's existing business operations with the business operations of AOL, upon which we express no opinion. The sufficiency of the procedures used in making an assessment of AOL Time Warner's financial capability is solely the responsibility of the City. Consequently, we make no representation regard sufficiency of the procedures used either for the purpose for which this analysis of financial capabilities, was requested or for any other purpose. 322801/1 14 Open Access Considerations Cable television operators nationwide are beginning to provide access to the Internet over their cable wires. Subscribers lease or buy "cable modems" that connect to the computer and allow access to the Internet via cable, as opposed to local phone lines. Cable modem service is often much faster than connections via phone lines and is a very attractive service offering. Typically, the cable operator has an affiliation with an Internet service provider ( "ISP "), such as Road Runner or @Home, which subscribers use to obtain access to the Internet. With the merger of TWI and AOL, AOL Time Warner would gain its own ISP affiliate in which to provide TWI subscribers high- speed Internet access, that being AOL. This benefit is likely a primary reason for the proposed merger. There has been considerable debate over whether cable television operators must allow unaffiliated ISPs "open access" to their cable modem platforms. The proposed transfer of control poses the question of whether AOL Time Warner will allow open access to its.cable modems for use of its system. Intending to provide more competition and choice for subscribers, some local franchising authorities have taken an aggressive approach by conditioning franchise renewals or transfers on open access requirements. All who have done so have thus far found themselves in court. One case that has gained national attention on this issue is AT &T Corp. v. City of Portland, 43 F. Supp. 2d 1146 (D. Org.. 1999). In this case the City of Portland and Multnomah County, Oregon, in reviewing the proposed transfer of control of TCl to AT &T, passed a resolution requiring AT &T to, allow unaffiliated ISPs to connect their equipment directly to AT &T's cable modem platform, bypassing @Home, its proprietary cable ISP. AT &T refused the open access requirement, which essentially led to a . denial of the proposed transfer. AT &T and TCI sued the City and County in federal district court, where the City and County received a favorable decision. AT &T has since appealed, and a decision from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals is expected sometime in 2000. Faced with ongoing criticism, AT &T not long ago announced its commitment to provide open access to its cable and fixed wireless systems and afford subscribers a . choice of ISPs. The decision becomes effective this year for subscribers served by AT &T's fixed wireless systems and in mid -2002 for subscribers of AT &T's broadband cable systems, after AT &T's exclusivity contract with cable ISP, @Home, expires. Many cable operators argue that it is bad policy to mandate access to new technologies and infrastructures that are privately owned and financed. The Federal Communications Commission has so far maintained a hands -off approach, intending to have competition control. Some public utilities commissions, such as Minnesota's for example, have also avoided the issue, letting market forces drive the issue. Local governments continue to point out that without regulation, cable providers may be able to monopolize the Internet, and subscribers will not be able to select their ISP of choice. 322801/1 15 With the level of scrutiny the open access issue has undergone on the federal, state, and local level, TWI and AOL have responded by entering into Memorandum of Understanding Regarding Open Access Business Practices dated February 29, 2000 ( "Memorandum "). According to TWI and AOL, they intend to enter, into as quickly as possible an agreement to provided broadband AOL Internet service on TWI's cable systems. The agreement is to be used as a model for the commercial agreements that will be available to other ISPs. Specifically, the Memorandum commits to offer: , Consumer Choice: AOL and TWI stipulate that AOL Time Warner is committed to offer consumers a choice among ISPs. Consumers will not be required to purchase service from an ISP that is affiliated with AOL Time Warner in order to enjoy broadband Internet service over AOL Time Warner cable systems. 2. Diversity of ISPs: AOL and TWI stipulate that AOL Time Warner will not place any fixed limit on the number of ISPs with which it will enter into commercial arrangements, and it will offer these ISPs the choice to partner on a national (on all AOL Time Warner cable systems), regional, or local, basis, in order to facilitate the ability of consumers to choose among ISPs of difference size and scope. 3: Direct Relationship with the Customer for ISPs: AOL and TWI stipulate that AOL Time Warner is also committed to allow both the cable operator and the ISP to have the opportunity to have a direct relationship with the consumer. Accordingly, both the cable operator and the ISP will be allowed to market and sell broadband service directly to customers. When an ISP sells broadband Internet service directly to a customer, it may, if it so chooses, bill and collect from the customer directly. 4. Video Streaming: AOL and TWI stipulate that AOL Time Warner will allow ISPs to provide video streaming, which is essentially video conferencing over the Internet. AOL Time Warner states that it recognizes that some consumers desire video streaming, and AOL Time Warner will not block or limit it. 5. Fast Action: The Memorandum is subject to existing TWI obligations, such as its contracts with other cable modem ISPs like Road Runner. TWI stipulates that it is committed to provide consumer choice as quickly as possible, and to that end, will work to achieve that goal before its current obligations expire. Despite such statements, TWI may struggle to achieve its goals of providing consumer choice among ISPs in light of existing contract obligations with Road Runner and other ISPs. AT &T, for example, has been forced to wait until mid -2002 to offer its broadband subscribers such choice, when its contract with @Home expires. 322801/1 16 The Memorandum states that AOL Time Warner will. offer ISPs the choice to partner with it to offer broadband. Internet service on a national, regional, or local basis to facilitate choice among ISPs of different size and. scope. However, it seems that only those ISPs with the financial resources to provide Internet service on a large:scale will be given such opportunity. The Memorandum states that AOL is committed to bring the benefits of the to all Americans, but it "will not allow ISPs to offer 'redlined' service to only a portion of an AOL Time Warner cable system..." The, Memorandum seems to encourage open access, which is a positive step from the City's perspective. However, there are many terms, conditions, and parameters that still need to be articulated and likely will be in the forthcoming agreement between AOL and TWI. There is no doubt that the Memorandum is timely as the City and many others like it are now considering the proposed transfer of control. The Memorandum commits to open access, but under undisclosed terms and conditions. In light of the pending Portland decision, the City should be wary to condition approval on open access issues. As stated before, those cities who have are in court. We will keep the City abreast of any developments in the case and with the open access issue in general. In the meantime, if the City choose's to approve the transfer, the proposed resolution, found at Exhibit A to this Report, reserves the City's right to impose open access conditions at a later date. 322801/1 17 Recommendations Based strictly on the information made available to us at the time of this review, we believe that the Franchisee, as controlled by AOL Time Warner, will possess the necessary legal, technical, and financial qualifications based on the standards of review identified in applicable law, and the Franchise as described within this Report. Based on these findings, we recommend that: 1. The City Council review this Report, listen to public comment, as necessary or appropriate, and undertake all necessary action to pass and adopt a resolution similar in form and content to the document following these recommendations. 2. The City follow -up to ensure that the Franchisee submit the Acceptance of the Resolution Approving the Transfer of Control, which must be delivered following closing of the transaction. 322801/1 18 Exhibit A Resolution - Approving Transfer 322801/1 RESOLUTION NO. APPROVING THE TRANSFER OF CONTROL OF KBL CABLESYSTEMS OF THE SOUTHWEST, INC., THE CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISEE, RESULTING FROM THE MERGERS OF SUBSIDIARIES OF TIME WARNER, INC. AND AMERICA ONLINE, INC. INTO AOL TIME WARNER, INC. WHEREAS, on or about January 1, 1987, the City of Edina, Minnesota ( "City ") passed and adopted Ordinance No. 1996 -4, granting a Cable Television Franchise ( "Franchise ") currently held by KBL Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc. ( "Franchisee "), a subsidiary of Time Warner, Inc., doing business as Time Warner Cable (collectively, "TWI "); and WHEREAS, on January 10, 2000, a certain Agreement and Plan of Merger ( "Merger Agreement ") was made and entered into by and among TWI and America Online, Inc. ( "AOL "); and WHEREAS, the Merger Agreement contemplates the merging of a to -be- formed TWI subsidiary and a to =be- formed AOL subsidiary with a parent holding company known as AOL Time Warner, Inc. ( "AOL Time Warner'); and WHEREAS, TWI and AOL have requested consent by the City to these mergers and the resulting transfer of control of the Franchisee to AOL Time Warner; and WHEREAS, under the Franchise and applicable state and federal law, the proposed mergers and resulting transfer of control of the Franchisee require consent from the City; and 322801/1 1 WHEREAS, the City has reviewed the proposed mergers, transfer of control, and the legal, technical, and financial qualifications of AOL Time Warner; and WHEREAS, based on information obtained and on the reports and information received by the City from TWI and AOL, the City has found no reason to disapprove of the proposed transfer of control of the Franchisee to AOL Time Warner. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council for the City resolves as follows: 1. The Franchise is in full force and effect, and the Franchisee is the lawful holder of the Franchise. 2. The Franchisee will remain the lawful holder of the Franchise after consummation of the mergers contemplated under the Merger Agreement. 3. The City hereby consents to and approves of the proposed transfer of control of the Franchisee subject to: a. Closing of the transaction contemplated within the Merger Agreement pursuant to the terms, and conditions described in information provided to the City by TWI and AOL. b. AOL Time Warner or the Franchisee notifying the City in writing of the completion of the mergers and the transfer of control within thirty (30) days of the date of closing. C. The Franchisee, within thirty (30) days of the date of closing, providing the City with a signed acceptance of this 322801/1 2 Resolution in the form attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. d. AOL Time Warner, TWI, or the Franchisee, within thirty (30) days of the date of adoption of this Resolution, reimbursing the City for all reasonable costs, expenses, and professional fees related to the City's review and action on the proposed mergers and the transfer of control. 4. The City hereby waives any right of first. refusal which the City may have to purchase the Franchise, or the cable television system serving the City, but only as such right of first refusal applies to the request for approval of the mergers and the transfer of control now before the City. 5. In the event the mergers of the TWI and AOL subsidiaries into AOL Time Warner contemplated by the foregoing resolutions is not completed, for any reason, the City's consent shall not be effective. 6. The City's approval of the transfer of control does not waive or diminish any lawful authority of the City to require the provision of non - discriminatory access to the cable system for providers of Internet access service, subject to applicable law. The City and the Franchisee have not waived any rights, obligations, claims, defenses, or remedies regarding the authority of the City to impose such conditions. Prior to the enactment of any such requirement, the Franchisee shall be provided with reasonable notice and an 1.322801/1 3 opportunity to be heard, including the right to present evidence on any findings to be made by the City with respect to the need for such'a requirement. 7. To the maximum extent permitted' by all applicable local, state, and federal laws, this Resolution shall not be construed to in any way relieve the Franchisee nor limit the Franchisee from any liability under the Franchise. This Resolution shall take effect and continue and remain in effect from and after the date of its passage, approval, and adoption. A motion to approve the foregoing Resolution No.. was made by Council Member and duly seconded by Council Member The following Council Members voted in the affirmative: The following Council Members voted in the negative: Passed and adopted by the City Council for the City this day of , 2000. ATTEST: CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA 322801/1 4 By: Its: ACCEPTANCE OF THE RESOLUTION APPROVING THE TRANSFER OF CONTROL KBL Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc. hereby agrees to comply with the terms and conditions of this Resolution No. and the Franchise referenced herein. KBL CABLESYSTEMS OF THE SOUTHWEST, INC. By_ Its Subscribed and sworn to me this to me this day of , 2000 Notary Public 322801/1 5 o e ch 0 a is TO: FROM: VIA: SUBJECT DATE: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Mayor Maetzold and Members of the City Council John Keprios, Director of Parks and Recreation Gordon Hughes, City Manager REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $20,000 March 29, 2000 AGENDA ITEM V. A. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Wooddale Park Comfort Station Company 1. K.A. Witt Construction, Inc. 2. Terranova, LLC 3. Nadeau Utility, Inc. 4. Hunerberg Construction Co. 5. United Contracting Corporation RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: K.A. Witt Construction, Inc. $119,047.00 Amount of Quote or Bid 1. $119,047.00 2. $126,900.00 3. $129,921.00 4. $135,100.00 5. $138,900.00 Account #: P080 -4901 GENERAL INFORMATION: On Tuesday, March 28, 2000, bids were .opened for the construction of the Wooddale Park comfort station. At the October 19, 1999, City Council meeting, the Council approved the Park Board's recommendation for "construction of the proposed comfort station at Wooddale Park with the addition of a water fountain." Please know that the Edina Lions Club has since donated a drinking fountain for Wooddale Park which will be located adjacent to the comfort station. The comfort station includes a unisex bathroom, a mechanical/utility room, over -hang roof accommodating three eight foot picnic tables, and includes an electronic keyless locking system. The design was the result of several input meetings with a 15 member neighborhood committee. The bid also includes relocation of utilities (sewer, water, electrical, and phone line for keyless locking system). If the bid is awarded by Council, Park Department staff will be relocating the existing picnic shelter gazebo to. Utley Park to make room for the new comfort station. Our project Architect/Consultant from SGN Architects has contacted references on K.A. Witt Company and recommends approval of bid. The architect's construction estimate was approximately $120,000 for this building. If approved by Council, construction will be completed by July 28, 2000. John Kep , Director This Recommended bid is within budget -2- Edina Park and Recreation Department k not within budW n .dohn_Vta11ikkinance Director Gordon Hugh(, City Manager A-) ,:i TO: FROM: VIA: SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Mayor Maetzold and Members of the City Council John Keprios, Director of Parks and Recreation Gordon Hughes, City Manager REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $20,000 DATE: March 29, 2000 ITEM DESCRIPTION: Fourth of July Fireworks Display. Company 1. RES Specialty Pyrotechnics RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: RES Specialty Pyrotechnics $11,000.00 AGENDA ITEM V. B. Amount of Quote or Bid 1. $11,000.00 Account #:0505 -4504 GENERAL INFORMATION: This is for purchase of a professional fireworks display for the annual Fourth of July Celebration at Kenneth Rosland Park. RES Specialty Pyrotechnics has been the supplier of this custom fireworks display for the City of Edina's Fourth of July Celebration in 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, and 1999. Due to the large number of unique (only supplier) quality custom made fireworks shells, it is staffs recommendation that the Edina City Council approve RES specialty Pyrotechnics 4th of July Fireworks Display Proposal for this year, 2000, for $11,000, which was the same dollar figure in 1999. The 4th of July this year is on a Tuesday. In the event that the presentation must be canceled due to inclement weather, such as strong winds, the contract will stipulate that the presentation will take place on Wednesday, July 5, 2000. The attached proposal includes a $2,000,000 liability insurance coverage and includes the City of Edina as co- insured on the certificate of insurance. For your information, on the 4th of July, the John Philip Sousa Band will begin playing at Kenneth Rosland Park at 8:45 p.m. and the fireworks display will begin at 10:00 p.m. Edina Park and Recreation John Keprijsebirector Department This Recommended bid is within budget not within bud j% �a in, i ance Director Gordon Hughes, (qty Manager Ir i `- FIREWORKS DISPLAY PROPOSAL FOR EDINA, MN, JULY 4th, 2000 CELEBRATION Presented by. r # - RES Specialty Pyrotechnics NONDISCLOSURE The material contained in this document is confidential and is for review only by those directly involved in awarding this bid. This document may not be copied or reproduced in any fashion without the written consent of RES Specialty Pyrotechnics. CONFIDENTIALITY Our ideas, concepts and creativity are our livelihood. Your respect for our confidentiality is appreciated. 0 Introduction RES Specialty Pyrotechnics has been providing fireworks both indoors and out for over 17 years. We specialize in electronic firing of fireworks from simple displays to sophisticated computer choreographed and microprocessor controlled pyromusical displays. RES Specialty Pyrotechnics is also a custom manufacturer of fireworks that are available only to our customers. Kent Orwoll, VP, Production is a master shell builder, having won numerous awards in competition at the Pyrotechnics Guild International Convention held annually. Steve Coman, CEO, also serves on the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Pyrotechnics committee. This committee. is responsible for creating the NFPA standards and codes. used by Fire Marshals and Fireworks operators across North America. Locally, Steve also serves on the Minnesota State Fire Marshals committee for state licensing of operators. Display Design Philosophy • In order for a display to be "Spectacular ", it first must be a safe display.. Safety comes not only by following- established codes and standards, but also by drawing upon experience. For example, simply meeting a distance requirement to shoot a 10" shell does not ensure that it will be safe. Other parameters must be considered. Shell function, surroundings and fallout area also play a role. Let's use our 10" shell as an example. Using a 10" shell requires a minimum separation distance. of 700 ft. from our audience. The key word is minimum. Not all 10" shells function the same. For example, a 10" Kamuro shell may meet code requirements but still may pose a hazard since this shell produces spark trails that often reach the ground. These sparks can also travel past the fallout area due to weather conditions. A 10" Double petal chrysanthemum is a shell of equal beauty but may be more appropriate. Our selection of display fireworks includes a broad spectrum of styles and origin. We carefully select the best variety of Chinese, Taiwanese, European and domestic product. We balance these selections with our own custom manufactured product to provide the best assortment possible. 80% of our shells incorporate tailed effects providing additional impact and allowing the audience to follow the shells on their rise into the air. Judging shows by shell count alone can be, at best, misleading to the purchaser. Shells of the same size and description can vary widely in both quality and cost. RES Specialty Pyrotechnics does not. "pad" shell counts with inferior quality shells. The old saying, "if it looks too good to be true, it probably is" holds true. t A ® For example, a high quality domestic or Japanese style shell can cost as much as 6 times the cost of a lower quality Chinese shell of the same size and type. A show with a large shell count of low quality product fired in a random fashion does not have nearly the impact of a carefully choreographed show with a good selection of high quality product. Display Presentation Frequently overlooked by the display purchaser, the aspect of how the display is "shot" or presented is the most critical aspect after safety to a successful display. This is the area where a company that understands choreography demonstrates true pyrotechnic artistry. We design our "stand alone" shows with an opening segment, followed by the main body that incorporates varied themes and styles and culminating with our "crescendo style" finale. Our talent really shines when we combine our efforts with multi -media such as recorded or live music, intelligent lighting, etc., Through,use of digital time code synchronization, we script the fireworks to the - music. The computer handles all of the timing and firing of effects for precise timing. Understanding your event and incorporating the fireworks into the overall presentation rather than "shooting a bunch of fireworks" makes the whole experience that more memorable. Why all the fuss over shooting style? Choreography allows the audience to appreciate the show better since they pick up on the themes that are presented with the fireworks. This sets up the audiences' expectations. In other words, there is rhyme to the reason. To accomplish this we also fire our shows electrically. This gives us several advantages. • Precision timing of firing. • Easier control of show pacing. • Multiple firing not possible via hand firing'. • Added safety for the audience and our staff due to the increased control of execution. Electrical firing allows us to have the entire show preloaded beforehand. This allows us the opportunity to precisely choreograph the show. Add into this time ® code synchronization and fully automated control for truly "catch your breath" presentations. I ® Preloading the show allows us to better protect the show beforehand against weather and eliminates having to handle shells in the dark to reload thereby increasing safety. Announcement and Opening Salvo: This is the initial attention getter. The purpose is letting the audience know the show has begun. Intense color and noise predominate. Typically, a wall of tailed titanium aerial salutes opens across the firing site followed by a series of fancy color shells. Main Body Aerial effects would be grouped and combined along the following themes. • Pattern shells, i.e., hearts, hourglass, stars, butterflies, rings • Special Effect shells, i.e. , whistles, serpents, tourbillions • Strobe and shimmer effects • Glitter and tremelon shells • Crackling and Crossette shells • Traditional Japanese shells, i.e., Diadems, Saturn, Palms, Chrysanthemums Finale There is no mistake when our finales start. The sky is filled with color and sound that builds in intensity as it progresses. Multiple levels of effects appear as the finale unfolds. The colors and effects appear to "morph" from one color to the next into. glitter into, larger color into larger glitter culminating in waves of tailed titanium salutes that increase in intensity. As the thunder from the salutes reach their peak, an increasing scale of fancy color shells overhead compliments them. Display Product Content Based upon your budget of $11,000.00, we can offer our services of choreography, setup, execution and teardown with the following listed product. We provide insurance for our displays ($2,000,000.00) with the purchaser and other required entities listed as additional insured. All of our operators are Minnesota licensed as well as Pyrotechnics Guild International certified. Finale Type Size Quantity Opening 3" 144 Type Size Quantity Silver tail Titanium Salute 3" Color Shell 12 Fancy Color 4" Color Shell 2 Chrysanthemum 8" Color Shell 1 TOTAL DEVICES TOTAL DEVICES 15 Main Body Type Size Quantity Special effect mines 3" 36 Gold Crossette Comets 3" 12 Color Peony /Chrys. 4" 65 Diadem /Kamuro/Willow 4" 3 Palm Tree 4" 2 Special Effect Custom Shells 4" 10 Pattern Shell 4" 6 Multibreak Custom Shells 4" 4 Color Peony /Chrys. 5" 64 Diadem /Kamuro/Willow 5" 2 Special Effect Custom Shells 5" 17 Pattern Shell 5" 4 Multibreak 5" 3 Color Peony /Chrys. 6" 42 Diadem /Kamuro/Willow 6" 4 Pattern Shell 6" 4 Special Effect Custom Shells 6" 3 Crackle /C rossette 6" 3 Multibreak Custom Shells 6" 2 Color Peony /Chrys 8" 8 Diadem /Kamuro/Willow ' 8" 4 TOTAL DEVICES 298 Finale Type Size Quantity Tailed Salute 3" 144 Color Shell 3" 144 Color Shell 4" 12 Color Shell 51' 6 Color Shell 8" 1 TOTAL DEVICES 307 Grand Total Devices 620 RES provides all equipment, technicians, fireworks and labor to setup, execute and tear down the display. Purchaser is responsible for security, fire watch and acquiring all permits and state sales tax on materials. RES will however, assist purchaser with permit acquisition. Disclaimer This proposal was prepared based on information available at the time of preparation. Substitutions of materials by RES Specialty Pyrotechnics will be at an equal or greater value to those listed. Changes made by purchaser may increase costs. References: All displays are painted in the best light on paper. Choosing from a paper bid alone can be very difficult. RES Specialty Pyrotechnics provides their services to many area communities and companies. We want all of our customers to be return customers. Listed here are :references for some of the local shows ' we have provided on a continuing basis. City of Mankato Ms. Maureen Gustafson 800 - 657 -4733 City of Lakeville Steve Michaud 952- 985 -4601 LeSueur Giant Days Mr. Bill Boyland 507 - 665 -3383 Apple Valley Brigit Sampson 952 - 953 -2314 City of Rosemount Ms. Kathy Busho 651 - 423 -4411 City of Belle Plaine Mr. Jim Lange 952 - 873 -4310 City of Jordan Sharon Velishek 952 - 492 -2300 Scott County Fair Mr. Dana Sibbitt 952 - 758 -5155 Mall of America Maureen Hooley Bausch 612 - 883 -8849 Knotts' Camp Snoopy Craig Freeman 612 - 883 -8501 P r o e REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: April 4, 2000 ITEM DESCRIPTION: Water Meters Company 1. Hydro Supply Co. 2. 3. 4. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Hydro Supply Co. GENERAL INFORMATION: AGENDA ITEM v.c. Amount of Quote or Bid 1. $ 76,184.58 2. 3. 4. 5. $ 76,184.58 This is a proprietary purchase of water meters used in our water system. Our water system uses Badger water meters with a remote read. We have completed a major overhaul of approximately 2.5 million dollars of new residential meters and radio read equipment. The price list attached is for Badger commercial meters which our staff will install in the coming months. This list will establish the unit price and provide a not to exceed dollar amount. Public Works - Utilities Signat a Department The Recommended Bid is ` within budget not within budget n Wallin, Finance Director G& d& Hughes, eity fanager r- + " 't, j . Quantity Description Price Extended Price 90 3/4 x 7 -1/2 M25 PL Cu Ft w/ TRACE 179.75 16,177.50 24 1" M40.PL Cu Ft w/ TRACE 224.10 5,378.40 24 Model 25 TRACE Head Only 157.90 3,789.60 36 Model 40 TRACE Head Only 157.90 5,684.40 6 Model 70 TRACE Head Only 157.90 947.40 8 1 -1/2" M120 Cu Ft w/ TRACE Ellip Short 449.28 3,594.24 12 1 -1/2" M120 Cu Ft w/ TRACE Ellip Long 449.28 5,391.36 14 1 -1/2" M120 Cu Ft w/ TRACE Hex 449.28 6,289.92 27 Model 120 TRACE Head Only 188.00 5,076.00 5 2" Model 170 Cu Ft w/ TRACE Ellip Short 570.00 2,850.00 2 2" Model 170 Cu Ft w/ TRACE Ellip Long 570.00 1,140.00 2 2" Model 170 Cu Ft w/ TRACE Hqx 570.00 1,140.00 2 Model 170 TRACE Head Only 188.00 376.00 20 2" T -200 Turbo Cu Ft w/ TRACE 685.00 13;700.00 7l, s3cr �x _0 1 pSSO(Iat1011 Of Metropolitan Municipalities AGENDA ITEM: VI.A. DATE: March 22, 2000 TO: Mayors, Managers /Administrators, and Councilmembers FROM: Gene Ranieri, Executive Director RE: Vacancies on the AMM Board of Directors BOARD OF DIRECTORS VACANCIES — NOMINATIONS SOLICITED There will be three vacancies on the AMM Board effective in June of 2000. The officials selected to fill these vacancies are eligible to serve two two -year terms. The AMM Board consists of 19 city officials and is responsible for the overall direction of staff, approval of the annual budget and work program, establishment of the annual dues schedule, determination of yearly legislative priorities. The Board also makes appointments to the Transportation Advisory Board (TAB), Technical Advisory Committee (TAC), the Metropolitan Radio Board and the Metro GIS Policy Board. The Board meets the second Thursday of each month at 7:00 p.m. Nominations are solicited from all parts of the metro area and can be either elective or administrative officials. Action re uested The nominations should be in written form, including a brief resume of the nominee, and should be sent to the attention of Gene Ranieri. Nominations should be received in the AMU office by no later than Monday, April 10, 2000. Please call Gene Ranieri at 651- 215 -4001 should you have questions or want more detailed information. Thank you. 145 University Avenue West Saint Paul, Minnesota 55103 -2044 Telephone: (651) 215 -4000 Fax:-(651) 281 -1299 E -mail: amm @amm145.org REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item VI.B. From: ERIC ANDERSON Consent ❑ ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER Information Only El Date: APRIL 49 2000 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council ® Subject: RIGHT -OF -WAY PERMIT " Motion AND FACILITY USE ❑ Resolution AGREEMENT - METRICOM, ❑ Ordinance INC. ® Discussion RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Right -of -way Permit and Facility Use Agreement. INFO/BACKGROUND: Last September, the City was approached by Metricom, Inc. with a request to approve a blanket right- of- way(ROW) permit and facility use agreement. Metricom, Inc. is introducing a new wireless high speed internet service to the Twin Cities early next year. This service will compete with US West's ISDN and Megabit service and Time Warner's Roadrunner service. In order to operate their system, Metricom needs to attach shoebox size radios to lightpoles, traffic signals or power poles in Edina. Under the State ROW statutes, Metricom has the authority to locate their equipment in the ROW, but would need to apply on either a pole by pole or project by project basis for individual ROW permits. Metricom is requesting that the City grant a blanket ROW permit as opposed to the multiple permit process. In return for this agreement, 1 REPORT/RECOMMENDATION - Right -of -Way Permit and Facility Use Agreement - Metricom, Inc. Metricom would reimburse the City with a combination of pole fees, percentage of gross revenues and free subscriptions in addition to our own ROW permit fees. This agreement has been reviewed by the League of Minnesota Cities, the Suburban Rate Authority, and Edina's attorneys. After quite a bit of discussion, staff feels that Metricom has made the changes to the language of the agreement that address the City's concerns. Staff will make a presentation which describes the service, outlines Metricom's request, outlines how Metricom has addressed the staffs concerns, and a description of the financial terms of the agreement. Metricom is seeking approval of the agreement in 75 communities and 7 counties in the Twin Cities. To date, 34 communities and 2 counties have approved the agreement. Metricom currently is operating this service in Seattle, San Jose, & Washington D.C. and will begin servicing Chicago, Atlanta, New York, Los Angeles and a number of other metropolitan areas this year. A copy of a brochure describing the Metricom service is attached to this report. A representative from Metricom will attend the Council Meeting and be available to answer any questions you may have. 2 lb 10 FM RICOCHET© BY METRICOM®: BETTER WIRELESS DATA SERVICES FOR YOUR COMMUNITY EFZL� "Having Ricochet means that the students at Malcolm X Elernep'tary are able to access a very crucial..- research and communications tool, and, ultimately, become better lifiqlong learners." DR. JOHN PANNELL, PRINCIPAL MALCOLM X PILEMENTARY, WASHINGTON, D.C. /Metricom RICOCHET BY METRICOM Would you like to offer your community low -cost, high -speed online access — with no cabling, trenching or public investment? Metricom's twelve -year track record speaks for itself. Our experience enables us to offer the fastest and most reliable mobile data services in the industry. Leapfrogging current performance standards, our new network will provide your constituents wireless Internet, e-mail, and local area network access at speeds up to 128 Kbps — comparable to expensive ISDN connections. Q� r ♦�t ¢ k r 1 1 "San Jose is lenown rnrougnum, am wul µ µ.' -� Capitol of Silicon Valley. We have earned this distinction, not only because we house the nation's', top; high -tech firms in our own backyard, but because we use the latest state -of -the -art technology in our day -to -day operations. Our police and fire teams, finance department, libraries, and Inter- national Airport management use Metricom's wireless data network to access information and i communicate in real time from off-site locations. Being able to utilize key technology while retaini>. a sense of community is San Jose's key to success.» MAYOR SUSAN HAMMER CITY OF SAN JOSE WIRELESS With Ricochet service, inspectors can issue permits from the field, mobile libraries can have Internet access, cities can, monitor and control utility can check e-mail ]tors and contractors can offices. Grandparents can I ones. online. The uses are and Stanford Univem.ty test Ricochet wireless k ". a ri SIMPLE Because Metricom's Ricochet' poletop radios are so simple to install, bringing wireless In "ternet access to public services, schools, and corporate tenants becomes much easier = CONVENIENT Because of our unique network design and patented routing technology, Ricochet users do not experience the well- publicized busy signals that cause an uproar among users of other popular online services and wired Internet service providers. Our packet- switched system uses available radio frequencies so efficiently that it's easy to add additional users onto the same channel. Expanding network capacity and coverage is as simple as mounting new radios. And because the Ricochet network is completely private to the point it reaches the Internet, we provide unmatched wireless security through RSA encryption. LOW IMPACT Greater demand for Internet access, fax lines, and additional phone service has placed a significant burden on existing phone capacity. Increasing bandwidth for these technologies typically involves a significant infrastructure upgrade. Metricom, however, simply installs small radio transceivers on streetlight and utility poles, s "Because of the way the phone lines were set up, in the past, we had to run from the counter to the back of the shop to scan a credit card. And, what's worse, with every purchase, we were tying up a phone line. Most of our business is over the phone, so we can't afford to lose customers to a busy signal. With Ricochet, we don't have to. " at no cost to your community. These TAMI MURRAY, OFFICE MANAGER shoebox -sized radios have low visual or FENA FLOWERS, SEATTLE, WA environmental impact. It's the fastest, easiest way to increase available bandwidth for data services — without trenching, cables or street hardware. We are proud to offer a technology that has such little, impact on your neighborhood. w r Radios are generally mounted on less than 3`%, of poles in a given region, and operate in the public spectrum, similar! to devices like garage door openers and baby monitors. 997: Ricochet begins developmen, of a bigb -gwrd, >?S . wireless network... t998: Metricom wins state approval for usage of Southern and Central California street lights... EXPANDING Hundreds of communities like yours have given Metricom right -of -way approval. We have installed thousands of streetlight radios, providing access to some of the country's most technologically advanced institutions — organizations like Microsoft and the NASA -Ames Research Center, and universities like Stanford and George Washington University. Municipal employees use our services in growing numbers. We continue to gain new subscribers in the San Francisco Bay Area, Seattle, and Washington, D.C. regions and also offer coverage to many corporate campuses and airports throu -phout the nation. 'd r� "Ricochet has given me total independence. I can set up my laptop and portable printer and dazzle potential buyers with color presentations of homes anywhere in the marketplace. I can call up the latest listings right there, so the;' customer gets instant information and I get a potential sale." HUGH KELLY, BROKER i PARDUE REAL ESTATE, WASHINGTON, D.C. uf, 'L OPPORTUNITY We're offering you a unique public- private opportunity to bring your community new ways of communicating — without wires. A simple right -of -way approval is all it takes to get on board. With the Ricochet network and wireless technology, you can be online anytime, anywhere. Prepare your community for greater productivity with Ricochet high -speed wireless communications from Metricom. A representative will contact you to discuss our right -of -way application. For more information on the Ricochet system by Metricom, see us online at www.metiicom.com. Or e -mail requests to: rightofway@ricochet.net. r w xrst Alr; a r � r r, i 1 i• I Granting Metricom access to your right -of -way ensures:.. NO SURPRISES • Metricom has a twelve -year track record in the wireless telecommunications industry • Radios are installed in hundreds of municipalities across the U. S. • Thousands of satisfied subscribers prefer Ricochet over wire line services EASE OF ADMINISTRATION • Each radio installed by Metricom in minutes Minimal maintenance or ongoing administration required LOW AESTHETIC IMPACT •',Shoebox -sized radios are mounted on 'existing structures • Typically, no more than seven radios installed per square mile (less than 3% of streetlight poles per region) • No,trenching, cabling or street hardware ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY • Authorized by the FCC to operate in the public spectrum under Part 15 of FCC rules; other Part 15 devices include garage door openers and baby monitors BENEFITS TO YOUR CONSTITUENTS Wireless freedom • Travels with your laptop or handheld device • No need to install an extra phone line • Send e-mail without tying up a phone line • Stay in touch online, regardless of location Unlimited access • Stay online 24 hours a day • No busy signals • No dropped connections Low flat -rate pricing • No airtime charges • No billing surprises Convenient technology • ISDN`speed — performance comparable to wire,line solutions • Compatible with desktop, laptop or handheld computer devices • RSA security — safe against eavesdropping Copyright O 1995 Metricom, Inc. All rights resen•ed. As .With telephonemoclems and wireless services, speeds vary based on location, application, hardware, and software. To benefit from the Riaxhet wireless wrvices offered by A1etricom, users must be within the co —age areas of the Ricochet wireless network. Metricom, Ricochet, and MictoCellular Data Network are regkstert•d trademarks of Mcu-icom, Inc. All other trademarks are the propem' of their respective owners. Additional photos by I-arry Dale Gordon and Stephen Wilkes, G 1995 The.InugeBzr&" - ' ' - -- P/N ROW I -5/98 ry REFUKI %KECrUMMEN UA11UN To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # VI.C. From: Debra Mangen Consent 0 City Clerk Information Only ❑ Date: April 4, 2000 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Approve Agreement with Action ® Motion Hennepin County Replacing Election ❑ Resolution Equipment ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Approve the proposed agreement with Hennepin County authorizing the trade -in of Edina's existing optical scan equipment, the use of optical scan election equipment owned by Hennepin County, and the maintenance cost as outlined in the agreement. Info/Background: The City currently owns twenty -three optical scan ballot counting units that are used each election. This equipment was purchased in 1988 after extensive study and was "state of the art" equipment that changed how elections were managed. The optical scan equipment sped up the process of getting results. For cities that had previously used the large lever voting machines, there was no more: setting of each machine, warehousing equipment between elections, delivering and pick -up of huge lever machines. Voters could mark their ballots, verify how they voted, and submit their ballot for counting, before leaving the polling place. The equipment has served well for the past twelve years. However, the equipment is now obsolete and its original vendor no longer exists. For this reason, in 1998 a task force made up of City Clerks through out Hennepin County began looking at new equipment. After extensive work they recommended two vendors' models for consideration. At the same time, Hennepin County Elections decided since the County provides optical scan programming for all elections, it would be best if the County owned the equipment. This allows the County to make volume purchases of equipment and to negotiate better maintenance better prices. Hennepin County cities were surveyed to see if they would all agree to allow Hennepin County to purchase and own election equipment, provide programming at no cost to cities, and to negotiate reduced maintenance agreements (which should be the only direct cost for which cities would be responsible other than consumable supplies). Edina has been paying $430.50 per unit for maintenance for a total two year contract cost of $9,901.50. The amount proposed by Hennepin County amounts to $5,750.00 every two years which is a savings of $4151.50 for the first maintenance term. The response was yes from all cities. In 1999, Hennepin County prepared specifications and took bids for new optical scan equipment. Election Systems and Software (ESS) was the successful bidder and we are now ready to take delivery of the new equipment. Edina must turn ownership of its current equipment to Hennepin County to be used as a trade -in on the new equipment. The new equipment is still optical scan precinct ballot counters. The new counters' design should handle the ballots more efficiently. The most exciting feature, however, is the new counters' ability to transmit precinct results via wireless transmission to Hennepin County at the close of each election. This should allow Hennepin County to accumulate results shortly after the 8:00 p.m. closing. Results will be displayed on the County's website. Individual cities will be able to pull results for their city from the website on election night. Each counter also provides a tape print out of activity for audit purposes. The new equipment will be delivered early this summer and used in the Fall- 2000 elections for the first time. Agreement No. A08000 HENNEPIN COUNTY /CITY OF EDINA LEASE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made by and between the COUNTY OF HENNEPIN and the CITY OF EDINA, both political subdivisions of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the "County" and the "City" respectively. For purposes of this Agreement, the address of the County is A2300 Government Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487 and the address of the City is 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424 -1394. WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners in Resolution Number 99 -6- 426 authorized the purchase of election equipment (hereinafter "Election Equipment ") for a countywide optical scan voting system, election hardware and services through the State of Minnesota Cooperative Purchasing Agreement; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 383B.145, Subd. 9 may transfer property to the City for its use; and WHEREAS, the County desires to lease new Election Equipment to the City for use in all City elections. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual undertakings and agreements hereinafter set forth, the County and the City agree as follows: Section 1 SCOPE OF AGREEMENT 1.1 The County hereby leases to the City at the cost identified below and subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, and the City hereby agrees to lease from the County Election Equipment identified as: one (1) Model 100 Optical Scan Precinct Count Unit (including two (2) PCMIA memory cards, one (1) Model 100 metal ballot box, one (1) Model 100 hard cover carrying case, and one (1) Model 100 soft cover carry case) for each precinct contained within the City. The County may additionally lease to the City and the City may lease from the County one (1) Model 100 Optical Scan Precinct Count Unit and related items identified above for each backup Optech IIIP Precinct Count Unit transferred to the County by the City for trade -in value. Section 2 OWNERSHIP 2.1 The City acknowledges that the County owns the Election Equipment and that the,City is authorized to use said Election Equipment for official election related purposes. Use of the'Election Equipment for any other purpose is strictly prohibited absent express written consent of the County. 2.2 The City acknowledges and agrees that the Election. Equipment may contain proprietary and trade secret information that is owned by Election Systems and Software (ESS) and is protected under federal copyright law or other laws, rules, regulations and decisions. .The. City shall protect and maintain the proprietary and trade secret status of the Election Equipment. Section 3 HANDLING OF EQUIPMENT AND INDEMNIFICATION 3.1 The City shall be responsible for the Election Equipment while it is in the City's custody. The City either through insurance or a self - insurance program shall be responsible for all costs, fees, damages and expenses including but not limited to personal injury, storage, damage, repair and /or replacement of the Election Equipment while this contract is in effect, consistent with the City's. defense and indemnity obligations contained in Section 5.6 herein. Section 4 TERM, TERMINATION 4.1 The City and the County agree that this Agreement is in effect during the period commencing upon.signature by the County and terminating when the City and County mutually'agree that the equipment will no longer be used for the City's elections,,unless terminated sooner by either party with cause upon seven (7) calendar days' written notice to the other. Section 5 OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS 5.1 No Waiver. No delay or omission by either party hereto to exercise any right or power occurring upon any noncompliance or default by the other party with respect to any of the terms of this Agreement shall impair any such right or power or be construed to be a 2 waiver thereof unless the same is consented to in writing. A waiver by. either of the parties hereto of any of the covenants, conditions, or agreements to be observed by the other shall not be construed to be a waiver of any succeeding breach thereof or of any covenant, condition, or agreement herein contained. All remedies provided for in this Agreement shall be cumulative and in addition to, and not in lieu of, any other remedies available to either party at law, in equity, or otherwise. 5.2 Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. 5.3 Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties, and there are no understandings or agreements relative hereto other than those that are expressed herein. No change, waiver, or discharge hereof shall be valid unless in writing and executed by both parties. 5.4 No Assignment. Neither party shall assign, sublet or transfer this Agreement, either in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of the other party, and any attempt to do so shall be void and of no force and effect. 5.5 THE CITY AGREES THAT THE COUNTY IS FURNISHING THE ELECTION EQUIPMENT ON AN "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT ANY SUPPORT WHATSOEVER, AND WITHOUT REPRESENTATION OR ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES,, OTHER THAN THOSE PROVIDED BY ESS, INCLUDING BUT NOT IN ANY MANNER LIMITED TO, FITNESS FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSE, MERCHANTABILITY OR THE ACCURACY AND COMPLETENESS OF THE ELECTION EQUIPMENT. THE COUNTY'S SOLE LIABILITY AND THE CITY'S EXCLUSIVE REMEDY FOR ANY SUBSTANTIAL DEFECT WHICH IMPAIRS THE USE OF THE ELECTION EQUIPMENT FOR THE PURPOSE STATED HEREIN SHALL BE THE RIGHT TO TERMINATE THIS AGREEMENT. THE COUNTY DOES NOT WARRANT THAT THE ELECTION EQUIPMENT WILL BE ERROR FREE. THE COUNTY DISCLAIMS ANY OTHER WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, RESPECTING THIS AGREEMENT OR THE ELECTION EQUIPMENT. 5.6 In no event shall the County be liable for actual, direct, indirect, special, incidental, consequential damages (even if the County has been advised of the possibility of such damage) or loss of profit, loss of business or any other financial loss or any other damage arising out of performance or failure of performance of this Agreement by the County. The County and the City agree each will be responsible for their own acts and omissions under this Agreement and the results thereof to the extent authorized by law and shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the other party for such acts. Each party shall not be responsible for the acts, errors or omissions of the other party under the Agreement and the results thereof. The parties' respective liabilities shall be governed by the provisions of the Municipal Tort Claims Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466, and other applicable law. This paragraph shall not be construed to bar legal remedies one party may have for the other party's failure to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement. 5.7 Notice. Any notice or demand shall be in writing and shall be sent registered or certified mail to the other party addressed as follows: To the City: (Name) City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 To the County: Hennepin County Administrator A -2300 Government Center (233) Minneapolis, MN 55487 -0233 Copy to: Patrick H. O'Connor Director, Taxpayer Services Department A -600 Government Center (060) Minneapolis, MN 55487 -0060 5.8 Audit Provision. Both parties agree that either party, the. State Auditor, or any of their duly authorized representatives at any time during normal business hours, and as often as they may reasonably deem necessary, shall have access to and the right to examine, audit, excerpt, and transcribe any books, documents, .papers, records, etc., which are pertinent to -the accounting practices and procedures of the other party and involve transactions relating to this Agreement. Such materials shall be maintained and such access and rights shall be in force and effect during the period of the contract and for six (6) years after its termination or cancellation. 5.9 Whereas Clauses. The matters set forth in the "Whereas" clauses on page one of this Agreement are incorporated into and made a part hereof by this reference. 5.10 Survival of Provisions. It is expressly understood and agreed that the obligations and warranties of the City and County hereof shall survive the completion of performance and termination or cancellation of this Agreement. 5.11 Authority. The person or persons executing this Lease Agreement on behalf of the City and County represent that they are duly authorized to execute this Lease.Agreement on 'behalf of the City and the County and represent and warrant that this Lease Agreement is a legal, valid and binding obligation and is enforceable in accordance with its terms. 4 5.12 For use of the Model 1000 Optical Scan Precinct County Units, the City shall: a. Pay the County the amount of One Hundred dollars ($100) per Model 100 Optical Scan Precinct Count Unit upon delivery to the City of said equipment: . OR b. Convey to the County Optech IIIP Precinct Count Units equal in number to the number of Model 100 Precinct Count Units delivered to the City. The City makes no implied or express warranties concerning the equipment, and the County will accept the Optech IIIP Precinct Count Units if each is in reasonable working condition. See attached Exhibit A defining Optech IIIP Precinct Count Unit. 5.13 Maintenance Agreement. The County will enter into a Maintenance Agreement with Election Systems & Software, Inc., for maintenance of the City equipment at the expiration of the Warranty Period, determined to be December 31, 2001. The City shall obtain the services furnished by the Maintenance Agreement directly from Election Systems & Software, Inc.. The annual fee for said Maintenance Agreement shall be One Hundred Twenty-five dollars ($125) per unit, and any increase in the fee shall not exceed three percent (3 %) of the prior two (2) year Maintenance Agreement with the County. The City shall reimburse the County for the County's out -of- pocket costs in securing the Maintenance Agreement at the time of renewal of said agreement by the County. Payment by the City shall be made within thirty -five (35) days or receipt of invoice. 5.14 Program Service. The County shall, without charge, provide programming services prior to each time the City uses the Election Equipment. Service for accumulation of election results may be made available at the discretion of the County. 5.15 Inspection and Return of Equipment. The County shall . have the right to enter into and upon the premises where the Election Equipment is located for the purposes of inspecting the same or observing its use. On an annual basis, during the term of this Agreement, the City shall comply with the County's request for verification of Election Equipment inventory. Upon termination of this Agreement, the city shall forthwith deliver the Election Equipment to the County or its designee, complete and in good order and working condition. The City shall be responsible for all costs, including but not limited to shipping, related to the repair or replacement of lost, stolen, destroyed or damaged Election Equipment. THIS PORITON OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 5 COUNTY BOARD APPROVAL CITY, having signed this contract, and the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners having duly approved this contract on the 3rd day of August, 1999, and pursuant to such approval, the proper County officials having signed this contract, the parties hereto agree to be bound by the provisions herein set forth. Approved as to form COUNTY OF HENNEPIN STATE OF MINNESOTA By: Assistant County Attorney Chair of Its County Board Date: And: Assistant/County Administrator Approved as to execution Assistant County Attorney Date: ATTEST: Deputy /Clerk of County Board CITY OF EDINA Approved as to form By: Mayor By: City Attorney City Clerk/City Manager Date: 0 EXHIBIT A ADDENDUM TO AGREEMENT NO. A0800 The definition of an Optech IIIP Precinct Count Unit shall be: The unit includes the Optech IIIP optical scan ballot counting machine, two (2) memory pack, carrying case and ballot box. w T 4.91A, o e� REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # vi. D From: Francis J. Hoffma Consent ixi City Engineer r/ Information Only [:1 Date: April 4, 2000 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ❑ To Council Subject: Approve 2000 Sanitary Action E] Motion Sewer Improvements - Improvement No. Fx_1 Resolution Y399, L020, & L021. ❑ Ordinance F Discussion Recommendation: Authorize Phase II of the Sanitary Sewer Improvements: Improvement Project Y399, L020, and L021 which includes a gravity sanitary sewer diversion project, reconstruct the lift station at West 62nd Street and Pamela Park, and construct a new lift station at Garrison Lane. Info /Background: This project is Phase II of the Sanitary Sewer Improvements as identified in the 1997 TKDA Report "Evaluation of the City's Sanitary Sewer System ". Projects completed to date include manhole cover replacements, sump pump inspection program, Tower Street sanitary sewer diversion project, St. John's Ave. & Ashcroft Ave. sanitary sewer diversion project, and W. 58th St. peak sanitary sewer storage tank. This project includes constructing a gravity sanitary sewer diversion pipe from W. 601h St. and Oaklawn Ave. to a proposed reconstructed lift station at W: 62nd St. and Pamela Park. An alternate bid will also include a gravity sanitary sewer pipe from W. 58th St. and Philbrook Lane to the proposed W. 62 "d St. lift station. The purpose of this pipe is for future maintenance of the northerly trunk sanitary sewer that was constructed in the 1920's. Also included with this project is a proposed lift station located at the easterly end of Garrison Lane. This lift station will enable staff to isolate the St. John's Ave. and Ashcroft Ave. neighborhood from the trunk sanitary sewer during peak flows. See attached maps showing the proposed projects. A public informational open house was held on Tuesday, March 28. Thirteen residents attended this meeting to obtain information of how this project will affect them. Total estimated Project Costs for these projects are $1,110,000. These projects will be funded by the 1999 Utility Fund Bond proceeds. The proposed construction start for this project would be mid -May with a December construction completion. Staff recommends authorization to accept bids for this project. POTENTIAL RELIEF SANITARY SEWER PAMELA PARK PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER LIFT STATION SANITARY SEWER ROUTE THROUGH PAMELA PARK TH 100 PROJECT LOCATION TH 62 1 PROP. LIFT STATION GARRISON LANE I PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER U�MMIV r-ITY nF s:nihiA IMPROVEMENT NO. Y-399 UA Lu Z TH 621 U. SANITARY SEWER FORCEMAIN ROUTE STRACHAUER PARK I I T I SANITARY SEWER FORCEMAIN ROUTE /l NA o e \N� fees REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # yl.E. From: Francis J. Hoffman Consent ❑x City Engineer Information Only ❑ Date: April 4, 2000 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Storm Sewer Improvements Action ❑ Motion Country Club District ® Resolution Improvement No. STS -253 ❑ Ordinance F-1 Discussion Recommendation: Approve project, authorize plans, specifications, and bids to be taken for Improvement Project No. STS -253. Info /Background: This project is part of our flood reduction program and affects one area (Arden Avenue) in the Country Club District identified in the 1997 Barr Engineering Report. Also, the project provides a new main storm sewer line along Bridge Street in the center of the District, and some additional storm sewer at the Sunnyside and Arden / Grimes intersection to prevent drainage reaching the flood prone area in Arden south of Bridge Street. The estimated project cost is $901,554.88. During the project, some of the water and sanitary sewer systems would be impacted. Due to their age, we would do some replacement. This cost is approximately $100,000 of the $901,554.68 estimate. The funds for this project would be from the bond sale that also was part of the funding mechanism. for the sanitary sewer improvements in the Phase II Sanitary Sewer Program as identified by our consultant, TKDA. Also, sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer funds from our normal utility funds will be used. This project will be constructed this season as all bond funds must be expended by next spring. s — =area of storm sewer improvement Q CALVIN 3 CHRISTIAN W 40 TH ST w SCHOOL uj Lu Q w > w > w > Z� Q � N x ' w z z WEBER FIELD W 42 NO ST Lu f e i Y a p Q ~ O U R O U M RNIN SIDE RD edina morningside� z w ° -j w � Q 3 church n w a Q sr Q DRPNSDN Lu `'j o gATH PQ a Q ¢ LL w r W w 0� 1 1 > O Y a w � > a a o 4 45TH ST LD yJ�N > uj cn RD Q W 44TH Q Q ST NN ODE YS ¢ o 4 > SU CIR °� a > > . w u� 47TH =OORE c" \) a m ¢ ¢ Q Q a o RD ST rte) a 8R t DGE LA r cn - Y �VQ 3 Q J O U Q Vl LA a ? o x LO ¢ Q Lu 3q Q w o 4 WOOD' � ° so i�0 g O o c aq za o¢ ~ W 49rN od O¢ W a i y �90p 6 CLUB RD S T W 49 -1/2 w Q w ¢ F N UN1RV �_.�� CD EDINA CT ST U a ul �p pQ �- W P � R K L 50TH ST 3 HILLTOP j UTLEY 5t en — e hsc pal w Q w RANK LA PARK in Q t sss ¢ TU PAcDIyA PUS WO DAL cave 51 ST sT r HA LIBRARY LA j BRUCE OLICE EDINA „ -. n li PL — =area of storm sewer improvement E^ REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: Francis J. HoffmarC/� City Engineer U Date: April 4, 2000 Subject: Public Improvement No. BA -317 - Braemar / TH 169 Frontage Road from Braemar Arena to W 78th St. Recommendation: Agenda Item #vl.F. Consent x❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ❑ Motion ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance U Discussion j Approve project, authorize plans / specifications, and bids subject to State Aid approval designating the route and funding for the project. Also designating No Parking Any Time except for the Arena area. Info /Background: This project is part of our transportation plan for the City. This was identified in the W. 78th Street Corridor Study in 1997 -98. This project needed to wait until the Minnesota Department of Transportation completed the 1 -494 / TH 169 interchange. Also, the City of Edina had to annex land from the City of Bloomington so that the new street could be placed on our State Aid system. The annexation occurred in December, 1999, and currently the roadway request for State Aid designation is in the Commissioner's office of MNDOT for authorization. Staff has completed preliminary plans to submit to the State Aid Division for review upon notification of the roadway designation. The estimated cost for this project is $1,297,240.94. The staff is seeking reconveyance of MNDOT land adjacent to the proposed development of City land at the northeast corner of the 1 -494 / TH 169 interchange. This land is also a part of the new proposed roadway. Council Report/Recommendation Agenda Item VI.F. Page Two Staff has attached a sketch indicating.the roadway location and a corridor map. The roadway will generally be a two lane facility except along Braemar Arena which will be wider to allow for parking. Staff would recommend authorizing the project subject to: • State Aid Route Designation State Aid Funding • MNDOT permit to construct roadway if land is not reconveyed prior to road construction starting No Parking Any Time resolution except Arena Area. EDEN IyRAII BLOOMINUTUN w9 A W E o e EAST , 1111 � co y �R P O S ED R AD S ��e �. NEW STATE -AID EDINA EDINA NEW STATE -AID BLOOMINGTON BLOOMINGTON 9 LIBERTY PROPERTY TRUST /DIVERSIFIED PHAR. SERVICES CURRENTLY BLOOMINGTON OWNED . SIGNAL 6 INTERSECTION GEOMETRIC RECONSTRUCTION COST SPLIT We 78TH STREET CORRIDOR COST SPLITS o e En • ,�CbAsee Tv // REPO RURECOM MEN DATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # VI. G From: Francis J. Hoffman ! Consent City Engineer Information Only ❑ Date: April 4, 2000 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Set Public Hearing Date: for Action ® Motion School Road, Ruth Drive, and ®R @S011ltlOn W. 59`h Street Roadway Improvement A -189 ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Set hearing date of May 2, 2000. Info /Background: City staff is requesting these street improvements based on the condition of the streets. Staff has reviewed these projects and feel they are feasible. Staff is finalizing the feasibility report and will submit to Council prior to Public Hearing. Staff would suggest a public hearing date of May 2, 2000. Oi To: Mayor & City Council From: Marty Scheerer Fire Chief Date: April 4, 2000 Subject: Update Southwest Mutual Aid Association Agreements REPORT/RECOMMENDATION Agenda Item VI.H. Consent Information Only F1 Mgr. Recommends F-1 To HRA ® To Council Action F1 Motion ® Resolution Ordinance Discussion Recommendation: Approve the revised exhibit A of the Joint Cooperative Agreement For The Use of Fire Personnel and Equipment, dated 2 -16 -2000. Info/Background: This resolution is needed to update our mutual aid agreement with the Southwest Mutual Aid Association (SWMAA). The Minneapolis Fire Department would like to join the SWMAA. The proposed changes are administrative in nature and do not alter any core policy or procedures presently in place. RESOLUTION NO.2000- City of Edina WHEREAS, the City of Edina has previously approved and participated in a mutual aid, agreement between the southwest suburban governmental agencies to provide cooperative use of fire personnel and equipment; WHEREAS, the agencies participating in this agreement have been designated the Southwest Mutual Aid Association; WHEREAS, the existing agreement requires the parties of the agreement to approve by resolution a new Exhibit A to add a new member to the agreement; WHEREAS, the. City of Minneapolis would like to join the Association and would add to the overall effectiveness; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that: The revised "Exhibit A" dated 2 /16 /00which includes the City of Minneapolis is hereby approved as the new official list of parties to the agreement establishing the Southwest Mutual Aid Association. The City Clerk is directed to transmit a certified copy of this resolution to the Secretary of the Southwest Mutual Aid Association. Adopted this V, day of April, 2000. Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) Dennis F. Maetzold, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting, rfr,� and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. �� '2000 WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2 Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk City Hall (612) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 826 -0379 Southwest Mutual Aid Association Personnel And Equipment Agreement EXHIBIT A City of Bloomington: Bloomington Fire Dept. 2215 Old Shakopee Rd. Bloomington, MN 55431 City of Chanhassen: Chanhassen Fire Dept. 7610 Laredo Dr., Box 97 Chanhassen, MN 55317 City of Eden Prairie: Eden Prairie Fire Dept. 7801 Mitchell Rd. Eden Prairie, MN 55344 City of Edina: Edina Fire Dept. 6250 Tracy Ave. Edina, MN 55436 City of Excelsior: Excelsior Fire Dept. 339 3rd Street Excelsior, MN 55331 City of Golden Valley: Golden Valley Fire Dept. 7800 Golden Valley Rd. Golden Valley, MN 55427 City of Hopkins: Hopkins Fire Dept. 1010 1st St. S. Hopkins, MN 55343 City of Maple Grove: Maple Grove Fire Dept. 9101 Fernbrook Lane Maple Grove, MN 55311 City of Minneapolis Minneapolis Fire Dept. 300 S 5th St - Room 230 Minneapolis, MN 55415 City of Minnetonka: Minnetonka Fire Dept. 14550 Minnetonka Blvd. Minnetonka, MN 55345 City of Plymouth: Plymouth Fire Dept. 3400 Plymouth Blvd. Plymouth, MN 55447 City of Richfield: Richfield Dept. of Pub. Safety 6700 Portland Ave. Richfield, MN 55423 City of St. Louis Park: St. Louis Park Fire Dept. 5005 Minnetonka Blvd. St. Louis Park, MN 55416 City of Wayzata: Wayzata Fire Dept. 600 Rice St. Wayzata, MN 55391 Metropolitan Airport Commission: Airport Fire Dept. 6307 34th Ave. S. Minneapolis, MN 55440 2 -16 -2000 Southwest Mutual Aid Association Joint And Cooperative Agreement For Use Of Fire Personnel And Equipment I. PURPOSE This Agreement is made pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 471.59, which authorizes the joint and cooperative exercise of powers common to contracting Parties. The Parties to this Agreement wish to create a regional Mutual Aid Association, hereafter called the Southwest Mutual Aid Association, for the purpose of making fire equipment, personnel and facilities available to each other upon request. This Agreement is intended to give each Party the authority to send its equipment and personnel into the other communities and to provide for an Operating Committee to administer this Agreement. II. DEFINITION OF TERMS For the purposes of this Agreement, the terms defined in this section shall have the meanings given them below. Subd. 1. "Assistance" means the providing of fire personnel and equipment, fire investigators, fire inspectors; fire educators, fire instructors, training personal and associated equipment and facilities. Subd. 2. "Emergency" means a sudden and unforeseen situation requiring immediate action. Subd. 3. "Party" means a governmental unit which is a Party to this Agreement. Subd. 4. 'Requesting Official' means the person designated by a Party who is responsible for requesting Assistance from other Parties. Subd. 5. 'Requesting Party" means a Party which requests Assistance from other Parties. Subd. 6. "Responding Official' means the person designated by a Party who is responsible to determine whether and to what extent that Party should provide Assistance to a Requesting Party. Subd. 7. 'Responding Party" means a Party which provides Assistance to a Requesting Party. Subd. 8. "Specialized Activities" means non - emergency Assistance to include but not be limited to: fire investigators, fire inspectors, fire educators, fire instructors, training personal and associated equipment and facilities. Subd. 9. "Extraordinary Services" means emergency Assistance that includes activities beyond the normal scope of fire fighting, such as hazardous materials incidents, high level rescue, or dive rescue. Southwest Mutual Aid Association Joint And Cooperative Agreement For Use Of Fire Personnel And Equipment 1 -19 -95 2. III. PARTIES The Parties to this Agreement are those entities which approve this Agreement and execute a separate signature page in accordance with Section VIII. The Parties constitute the membership the Southwest Mutual Aid Association. Other entities may become a Party to this Agreement by complying with the conditions provided in the Association rules, by applying to and receiving approval of all member Parties, and by executing a separate signature page for this Agreement. Any Party may withdraw from membership at any time upon thirty days written notice to the other members. A party may be removed from membership only by a vote of at least three - quarters of all other Parties to the Agreement and only for the following causes: failure to comply with the terms-of the agreement as may be modified or a failure to pay dues. Action by any Party which is required or permitted under this Agreement will be evidenced by: • for a municipality, a resolution adopted by the governing body, or • for a non - municipality, a letter executed by an official with sufficient authority to bind that party which recites the basis of that authority. IV. PROCEDURE Subd. 1. Whenever, in the opinion of a Requesting Official, there is a need for Assistance from other Parties, such Requesting Official may, at his /her discretion, call upon the Responding Official of any other Party to furnish Assistance to and within the boundaries of the Requesting Party. Subject to the limitations set forth herein, it is the intention of the Parties to this Agreement to cooperate in the event of an emergency by making the necessary Assistance available to a Requesting Party without undue delay. Subd. 2. Upon the receipt of a request for Assistance from a Party, the Responding Official may authorize and direct the Fire Department personnel under his /her control to provide Assistance to the Requesting Party. Whether the Responding Party provides such Assistance to the Requesting. Party and, if so, to what extent such Assistance is provided shall be determined solely by the Responding Official (subject to such supervision and direction as may be applicable to him /her within the governmental structure of the Party by which he /she is employed). Failure to provide Assistance will not result in liability to a Party. Subd. 3. When a Responding Party provides Assistance under the terms of this Agreement, it may in turn request Assistance from other Parties as "backup" during the time that it is providing Assistance outside its boundaries. Subd. 4. Whenever a Responding Party has provided Assistance to a Requesting Party, the Responding Official may at any time recall such Assistance or any part thereof if the Responding Official in his /her best judgment deems such recall necessary to provide for the best interests of his /her own community. Such action will not result in liability to any Party. Southwest Mutual Aid Association Joint And Cooperative Agreement For Use Of Fire Personnel And Equipment 1 -19 -95 3 Subd. 5. The Requesting Party shall be in command of the emergency scene. The personnel and equipment provided by the Responding Party shall be under the direction and control of the Requesting Party until the Responding Official withdraws Assistance. Subd. 6. A Responding Party shall be responsible for its own personnel, equipment, and for injuries or death to any such personnel or damage to any such equipment, except that unused equipment provided by the Responding Party shall be returned to the Responding Party by the Requesting Party when circumstances permit this to be done. Responding personnel shall be deemed to be performing their regular duties for the Responding Party. Insurance coverage and any financial compensation shall be the responsibility of the Responding Party. Each Party waives the right to sue any other Party for any workers compensation benefits paid to its own employee or volunteer even if the injuries were caused wholly or partially by the negligence of any other Party, its officers, employees, or volunteers. Subd. 7. Specialized activities of a non - emergency nature may be requested and /or provided by the Parties to this Agreement. Subd. 8. No charge shall be made to a Party for Assistance rendered under this Agreement except that a Party providing Assistance shall be paid for the cost of supplies. A Party providing Assistance may charge for time and materials for Specialized activities and Extraordinary Service as provided for in the association rules. V. OPERATING COMMITTEE The association shall have an Operating Committee to administer this Agreement. Subd. 1. The Chief of each Party's Fire Department, or designee, shall be the Party's representative to the Association Operating Committee. Subd. 2. It is the responsibility of the Operating Committee to establish rules, policies, and standards and to take other necessary or prudent action to administer this Agreement. Subd. 3. The Operating Committee shall meet periodically, but not less than quarterly to conduct the business of the Association. Subd. 4. The Association is not a separate legal entity. The Operating Committee shall have ,no authority to own property, enter into contracts, or to receive and expend funds except for routine administrative expenses. VI.. RECIPROCAL DEFENSE AND INDEMNIFICATION Except for the United States Veteran's Administration Medical Center ( "the V.A. ") which is subject to federal laws prohibiting the following provision the Requesting Party agrees to indemnify and defend against.any claims brought or actions filed against the Responding Party or any officers, employees, or volunteers of the. Responding Party for injury or death Southwest Mutual Aid Association Joint And Cooperative Agreement For Use Of Fire Personnel And Equipment 1 -19 -95 4 to any third person or persons, or damage to the property of third persons, arising out of the performance and provision of Assistance in responding to a request for Assistance by the Requesting Party pursuant to this Agreement. The intent of the indemnification requirement of this section is to impose on each Requesting Party a limited duty to defend and indemnify any Responding Party for claims arising within the Requesting Party's jurisdiction subject to the liability limits under Chapter 466, Minnesota Statutes. The purpose of creating these reciprocal duties to defend and indemnify is to simplify the defense of liability claims by eliminating conflicts among defendants, and to permit liability claims against multiple defendants from a single occurrence to be defended by a single attorney. Under no circumstances, however, shall a Party be required to pay, on behalf of itself and other Parties, any amounts in excess of the liability limits established in Chapter 466, Minnesota Statutes, applicable to only one Party. The limits of liability for some or all Parties may not be added together to increase the maximum statutory liability limits for any Party. VII. WAIVER Each party waives all claims against the V.A. and the V.A. waives all claims it may have against any Party, for any compensation for any loss, damage, personal injury, or death occurring in the consequence of the performance of fire protection services for the V.A. or by V.A. personnel. However, this waiver does not preclude a fire organization from filing claims for fire fighting costs and losses pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 2210, beneficiaries from filing _ claims for the deaths of firefighters and other public safety officers pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 3796, and individuals other than the Parties and their employees, from filing claims against the United States pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1346(b) and 2671 -2680. VIII. EFFECTIVE DATE This Agreement shall be effective upon execution by three - quarters of the entities listed on the attached Exhibit A which is incorporated by reference herein. Each Party shall execute a separate signature page and forward that page to the Association Secretary, along with a resolution or letter as provided in Section III. Upon receipt of all executed signature pages, the Secretary shall send a copy of the fully executed agreement to each member. If this Agreement is executed by all of the entities fisted on the attached Exhibit A, this Agreement shall supersede, replace, and void all prior agreements which provide for the existence of the Southwest Mutual Aid Association, and all assets of the Association under those agreements shall be transferred to the Association created pursuant to this Agreement. If the Agreement becomes effective by less than unanimous approval, the Parties to this Agreement shall vote to transfer any assets of the pre- existing Southwest Mutual Aid Association to the Association created under this Agreement and shall thereafter give notice that they are withdrawing from the pre- existing Association. IX. AMENDMENT This Agreement may be amended or terminated upon the affirmative vote of three - quarters of the Parties then existing.. Southwest Mutual Aid Association Joint And Cooperative Agreement For Use Of Fire Personnel And Equipment 1 -19 -95 �1 o e APO leas REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: Ceil Smith Asst. To The City Manager Date: April 4, 2000 Subject: 2000 & 2001 Contract Local 49 Public Works & Park Maintenance Recommendation: Agenda Item Consent Information Only Mgr. Recommends Action # vl.l. ❑ To H RA ® To Council ® Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance U Discussion j Authorize execution of contract for 2000 and 2001 with Public Works and Park Maintenance. Info /Background: Staff and members of Local 49 have concluded negotiations regarding their labor agreement. We are happy to report that an agreement has been reached for 2000 and 2001. The proposed contract provides the following terms: Wage Adjustment Health Insurance Increase 2000 2001 3.0% 3.0% $30 /month $10 /month* The 2000 adjustments represent the same benefit package that we provided the non - bargaining unit employees. *The 2001 insurance adjustment would be adjusted to match the non - bargaining unit employees if their health insurance increase is more that $10 /month or it is subject to a re- opener (of this issue only) if health insurance premiums raise by more than 5% over the 2000 premium rates (approximately $25 /month increase). Other changes to the contract are as follows: Report/Recommendation Agenda Item VI.I. Page Two INCREASE EMERGENCY OVERTIME PAY TO INCLUDE CHRISTMAS EVE AND NEW YEAR'S EVE - The previous contract provides for emergency work performed on certain holidays shall be paid at a rate of 2 times an employee's regular rate of pay. We propose to add the following, after working 4 hours of their work shift employees that are called back to perform emergency work on Christmas Eve and New Year's Eve when Christmas Eve and New Year's Eve fall on Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday shall be paid 2 times the employees' regular rate of pay. SCHEDULED MONITORING OF THE UTILITY SYSTEM — For employees in the utility department who are scheduled to be available for recall on a 24 hour basis on Saturdays, Sundays, or holidays to operate the City's utilities, apart from their regularly scheduled shift, the City pays a premium. In order to remain competitive with other cities we think we need to raise that premium from $70 to $80. ADDITION OF THE CITY'S NEW POLICY TO PURCHASE UNUSED SICK LEAVE AT THE TIME OF RESIGNATION OR RETIREMENT FROM THE CITY — The City's new policy to purchase unused sick leave will be incorporated in the new labor agreement. All employees hired after January 1, 2000 will be subject to this change in the contract, while employees hired before January 1, 2000 will be given an opportunity to choose to stay with the current severance plan or go to the new buy back plan. DELETE COLUMBUS DAY FROM THE PAID HOLIDAY LIST — A situation existed when Columbus Day was observed, that Union employees in Public Works had that day as a paid holiday, and the rest of the Public Works supervisory staff had to work that day. In order to make this a more productive day; Columbus Day will no longer be a paid holiday. Each employee will receive a floating holiday that will be scheduled time off. This change will allow us to have the Public Works Department open that day. INCREASE PREMIUM PAY FOR PARK EMPLOYEES — During winter months in order to maintain the City's outdoor ice rinks the Parks Department employees start their scheduled work at 4:00 A.M. The City pays.a premium specifically for this type of work. In order to remain competitive with other cities staff proposes to raise the premium rate from $2.75 to $3.25 per hour for those hours worked before 7:00 A.M. CAREER DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM — Approximately three years ago staff and members of the Union started work on a program to provide advancement opportunities for the Public Works and Park Maintenance employees based on their performance, training, education and years of service. The program consists of 6 steps. Each step will have a certain number of requirements and associated pay. As employees advance through the steps they also increase their wages beyond what is in the current Report/Recommendation Agenda Item VI.I. Page Three wage schedule. From this point forward there will exist two separate wage schedules, one will be the current single rate system and the other will be the Career Development step system. The program is voluntary, and each employee must register to be admitted to the program. The intent of the program is to provide the opportunity for employees to take ownership and responsibility for their professional development and advancement. Employees are required to demonstrate that they successfully meet the qualifications of the subsequent step prior to their receiving approval to move to that step. The City must provide employees with the opportunity to obtain the necessary training and work experience to move within the Career Development Program. Staff has computed the percentage increase for the proposed total package (wage and insurance). For 2000 the total package equals a 3.42% increase. For 2001, the total package increase is 3.0 %. Staff believes the proposed contract is within the budget guidelines provided by the Council. Staff continues to believe that a two -year contract benefits both parties. Therefore, staff recommends the approval of the proposed agreement. �1 oe� En • ,�QDRPOB T °� REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item 4 VI.J. From: Francis J. Hoffman , k Consent City Engineer Information Only ❑ Date: April 4, 2000 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Dakota Trail Sanitary Sewer Action ❑ Motion Lift Station Renovation ® Resolution Project - Improvement No. LS -21 ❑Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Authorize project and direct staff to prepare plans /specifications for bid. Info /Background: This project is for the renovation of an existing sanitary sewer lift station located on Dakota Trail. The existing station is 33 years old and needs to be renovated. The project estimate, is $67,131.25. The project will be funded by utility funds. Staff would recommend that the project be approved and bids be taken to renovate the station. This project is part of our long term plan for upgrading our utility infrastructure. COUNCIL .CHECK .-.4ISTER 29 -MAR -2000 (14. page 1 CHECK-NO- DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 208975 04/04/00 $176.84 3M CO HGF0878 LETTERS FOR SIGNS TP22096 STREET NAME SI GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $176.84* 208976 04/04/00 $443.02 A B KENNEDY COMPANY CAREER EXPLOSION 2625 ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $443.02 *. 208977 04/04/00 $15.00 AVCAM DUES 032700 POLICE DEPT. G DUES & SUBSCRI < *> $15.00* 208978 04/04/00 $957.59 AAA TAX, TITLE, SPV FOR 2 031400 EQUIPMENT OPER LIC & PERMITS < *> $957.59* 208979 04/04/00 $1,345.06 AAA TAX, TITLE, SPV FOR 4 03/.14 EQUIPMENT OPER LIC & PERMITS < *> $1,345.06* 208980 04/04/00 $129.00 AAA VEHICLE TAB RENEWALS 032700 EQUIPMENT OPER LIC & PERMITS < *> $129.00* 208981 04/04/00 $699.92 Accessory Computer UPGRADE COMPUTER 821 GOLF ADMINISTR PROF SERVICES 6461 < *> $699.92* 208982 04/04/00 $654.98 ACME WINDOW CLEAN WINDOW CLEANING 033914 STREET REVOLVI GENERAL SUPPLI 5436 < *> $654.98* 208983 04/04/00 $376.98 ACTION MAILING SERVICE MAIL PROCESS 84517 GENERAL(BILLIN PROF SERVICES < *> $376.98* 208984 04/04/00 $376.00 ADECCO EMPLOYMENT SERVIC PART TIME TEMP 962348 INSPECTIONS SALARIES REG < *> $376.00* 208985 04/04/00 $195.00 ADVANCED PROFESSIONAL SE CONTINUING ED -.V. KO 032300 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $195.00* 208986 04/04/00 $66.00 Aearo Cc SAFETY GLASSES 04142830 PUMP & LIFT ST SAFETY.EQUIPME 04/04/00 $6.00 Aearo Co SAFETY GLASSES 04148753 GENERAL MAINT SAFETY EQUIPME < *> $72.00* 208987 04/04/00 $333.80 All Saints Brands COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 00019170 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 04/04/00 $42.00 All Saints Brands COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 00019384 YORK SELLING CST OF CD WINE 04/04/00 $110.40, All Saints Brands COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 00019392 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 04/04/00 $92.00 All Saints Brands COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 00019542 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 04/04/00 $552.36 All Saints Brands COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 00019548 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE < *> $1,130.56* 208988 04/04/00 _$90.00 American Public Works As SAFETY POSTERS 625205 TRAINING CONF & SCHOOLS 5443 < *> $90.00* 208989 04/04/00 $11.26 ANCHOR PAPER BROCHURE PAPER S2635640 COMMUNICATIONS COMMODITIES 04/04/00 $190.25 ANCHOR PAPER PAPER 12235330 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI 4672 < *> $201.51* 208990 04/04/00 $150.00 ANDERSON, ERIC REIMBURSE FOR ROTARY 032000 ADMINISTRATION DUES & SUBSCRI . < *> $150.00* 208991 04/04/00 $1,056.12 Andy's Market.& Deli ANNUAL COUNCIL MEETIN 031600 CITY COUNCIL MEETING EXPENS COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 29 -MAR -2000 (14:51) page 2 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <*> $1,056.12* 208992 04/04/00 $236.77 BROWN, ANNE BROWNFIELD BROCHURE 032000 GOLF ADMINISTR PRINTING 6479 < *> $236.77* 208993 04/04/00 $3,473.00 AON RISK SERVICES INC OF PREMIUM 264756 CENT SVC GENER INSURANCE 04/04/00 $371.00 AON RISK SERVICES INC OF PREMIUM 266626 CENT SVC GENER INSURANCE 04/04/00 $3,473.00 AON RISK SERVICES INC OF PREMIUM 267032 CENT SVC GENER INSURANCE < *> $7.,317.00* 208994 04/04/00 $665.61 ASHWORTH INC CLOTHING 638369 PRO SHOP. COST OF GDS -PR 6211 04/04/00 $227.83 ASHWORTH INC CLOTHING 638376 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6211 04/04/00 $825.50 ASHWORTH INC CLOTHING 638381 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6211 04/04/00 $713.00 ASHWORTH INC CLOTHING 638455 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6211 04/04/00 $656.90 ASHWORTH INC CLOTHING 639441 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6212 04/04/00 $429.61 ASHWORTH INC SHIRTS 647390 GOLF ADMINISTR GENERAL SUPPLI 6211 < *> $3,518.45* 208995 04/04/00 $167.00 ASSET RECOVERY CORP. ASSET RECOVERY 617575 CENT SVC GENER PROF SERVICES 4690 < *> $167.00* 208996 04/04/00 $20.00 Association of Recycling DUES - SOLVEI WILMOT 031600 PUBLIC HEALTH DUES & SUBSCRI < *> $20.00* 208997 04/04/00 $11.83 AT &T Wireless TELEPHONE 031600 CLUB HOUSE TELEPHONE < *> $11.83* 208998 04/04/00 $12.84 AT &T TELEPHONE 031200 BUILDING MAINT TELEPHONE < *> $12.84* 208999 04/04/00 $5.09 AT &T TELEPHONE 031800 FIRE DEPT. GEN TELEPHONE 04/04/00 $1.70 AT &T TELEPHONE 031800 SUPERV. & OVRH TELEPHONE 04/04/00 $1.27 AT &T TELEPHONE 031800 ENGINEERING GE TELEPHONE < *> $8.06* 209000 04/04/00 $46.36 AUTOMOBILE SERVICE COMPA ALIGN 21310 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 5658 < *> $46.36* 209001' 04/04/00 $162.28 Bad Debt - NCO Financial NCO FEE 032000 GENERAL FD PRO AMBULANCE FEES < *> $162.28* 209002 04/04/00 $465.00 BARR ENGINEERING COMPANY PAMELA PARK WETLANDS 2327354- PAMELA PK /LK S CIP 04/04/00 $744.00 BARR ENGINEERING COMPANY ARDEN AVE. ANALYSIS 2327354- ARDEN AVE SS CIP 04/04/00 $464.34 BARR ENGINEERING COMPANY BRAEMAR PATH CONCEPT 2327354- GOLF ADMINISTR PROF SERVICES < *> $1,673.34* 209003 04/04/00 $75.02 BATTERIES PLUS BATTERIES F5 -20207 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 5764 < *> $75.02* 209004 04/04/00 $67.52 Battery Wholesale Inc BATTERIES 8849 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5655 04/04/00 $140:07 Battery Wholesale Inc BATTERIES 8871 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 5819 < *> $207.59* 04/04/00 $180.00 BCA /Training & Developme ARSON INVEST. TRAININ T008833 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONF & SCHOOLS _209005 < *> $180.00* 1 , COUNCIL CHECK - JISTER 29 -MAR -2000 (14. , page 3 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT OFFICE VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 209006 04/04/00 $36.00 Beer System Maintenance BEERLINE CLEANING 3658 GRILL CONTR SERVICES 6325 < *> SUPPLIES $36.00* OFFICE SUPPLIES 7497950 OFFICE SUPPLIES 7503010 209007 04/04/00 $5.17 BELLBOY CORPORATION PLASTIC NUMBERS 30481200 LIQUOR YORK GE GENERAL SUPPLI 7510040 04/04/00 -$4.85 BELLBOY CORPORATION PLASTIC NUMBERS 30598300 LIQUOR YORK GE GENERAL SUPPLI CM745548 04/04/00 - $30.48 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 31461500 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX CORRECTION TAPE, MARK 04/04/00 $102.62 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 31558700 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX $545.71 04/04/00 $30.75 BELLBOY. CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 31588700 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE < *> $103.21* $210.82 Best Access Systems of M LOCK REPAIR 209008 04/04/00 $240.83 BENN, BRADLEY ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 031600 ART CNTR PROG SALE OF ART WO < *> $240.83* 209012 209010 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 - $25.17 $50.60 $8.72 $70.09 $55.96 $12.36 $85.97 $19.59 $221.69 $194.18 $67.99 $84.76 $60.99 -$3.35 -$3.12 -$6.17 $204.19 $12.94 $6.68 $77.54 $10.49 $105.81 $1,312.74* BERTELSON BROS. INC. BERTELSON BROS. INC. BERTELSON BROS. INC. BERTELSON BROS. INC. BERTELSON BROS. INC. BERTELSON BROS. INC. BERTELSON BROS. INC. BERTELSON BROS. INC. BERTELSON BROS. INC. BERTELSON BROS. INC. BERTELSON BROS. INC. BERTELSON BROS. INC. BERTELSON BROS.,.INC. BERTELSON BROS, INC. BERTELSON BROS. INC. BERTELSON BROS. INC. BERTELSON BROS. INC. BERTELSON BROS. INC. BERTELSON BROS. INC. BERTELSON BROS. INC. BERTELSON BROS. INC. BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLY RETURN CM746095 OFFICE SUPPLIES 7475240 OFFICE SUPPLIES 7478771 FILE, PRINTER STAND 7491050 SORTER 7493420 OFFICE SUPPLIES 7497950 OFFICE SUPPLIES 7497950 OFFICE SUPPLIES 7497950 OFFICE SUPPLIES 7503010 OFFICE SUPPLIES 7505170 CALCULATOR, PAPER, PU 7510510 BINDERS /CARTRIDGES 7509370 OFFICE SUPPLIES 7510040 OFFICE SUPPLIES CM741295 OFFICE SUPPLIES RETUR CM742343 OFFICE SUPPLIES RETUR CM745548 GENERAL SUPPLIES 7515580 OFFICE SUPPLIES 7519890 OFFICE SUPPLIES 7519890 CORRECTION TAPE, MARK 7521580 OFFICE SUPPLIES 7522120 OFFICE SUPPLIES 7523390" PARK ADMIN. GENERAL SUPPLI ART CENTER ADM OFF -ICE SUPPLIE 9183 POLICE DEPT. G OFFICE SUPPLIE 3162 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 5786 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 5786 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLI PARK ADMIN. GENERAL SUPPLI CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI POLICE DEPT. G OFFICE SUPPLIE 3167 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 5850 GOLF ADMINISTR OFFICE SUPPLIE 6462 FIRE DEPT. GEN OFFICE SUPPLIE 3788 POLICE DEPT. G OFFICE SUPPLIE 3143 POLICE DEPT. G OFFICE SUPPLIE 3146 POLICE DEPT. G OFFICE SUPPLIE 3155 MEDIA LAB GENERAL SUPPLI 9191 ASSESSING GENERAL SUPPLI FINANCE GENERAL SUPPLI PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 5931 ASSESSING GENERAL SUPPLI POLICE DEPT. G OFFICE SUPPLIE 3172 209011 04/04/00 $11.18 Best Access Systems of M LATCH MN -11458 STREET NAME SI GENERAL SUPPLI 5446 04/04/00 $81.07 Best Access Systems of M SPRINGS MN -11479 CITY HALL GENE GENERAL SUPPLI 5586 04/04/00 $276.90 Best Access Systems of M KEY PADS MN -11479 CITY HALL GENE REPAIR PARTS 5836 04/04/00 $276.90 Best Access Systems of.M KEY PADS MN -11479 FIRE DEPT. GEN REPAIR PARTS 04/04/00 $17.25 Best Access Systems of M LOCKS MN -11503 BUILDING MAINT REPAIR PARTS 5725 04/04/00 $545.71 Best Access Systems of M LOCKSET, KEYS, CORE MN -11503 BUILDING MAINT REPAIR PARTS 5725 04/04/00 $210.82 Best Access Systems of M LOCK REPAIR MN -11503 GOLF DOME REPAIR PARTS 6480 < *> $1,419.83* 209012 04/04/00 $93.63 BEST BUY COMPANY INC. CRAFT SUPPLIES 28101038 MEDIA LAB CRAFT SUPPLIES 9176 04/04/00 $367.32 BEST BUY COMPANY INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 28105637 MEDIA LAB GENERAL SUPPLI 9187 < *> $460.95* 209013 04/04/00 $100.00 BLOOD, DAVID POLICE SERVICE 040400 RESERVE PROGRA CONTR SERVICES < *> $100.00* 209014 04/04/00 $19.17 BLOOMINGTON LINOLEUM & C CARPET 15197W PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 5776 < *> $19.17* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 29 -MAR -2000 (14:51) page 4 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------=--------------------- 209015 04/04/00 $497.77 BLOOMINGTON SECURITY SOL SAFE REPAIR 127600 GOLF DOME CONTR REPAIRS 6460 < *> $497.77* 209016 04/04/00 $50.79 Blue Cross & Blue Sheild AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 032700 GENERAL FD PRO AMBULANCE FEES < *> $50.79* 209017 04/04/00 $25.64 BLUHM, KIMBERLEE ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 031600 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $25.64* 209018 04/04/00 $95.00 Boss Pumping CONTRACT PUMPING 1720 BUILDING MAINT PROF SERVICES 5251 < *> $95.00* 209019 04/04/00 $179.31 BRAEMAR PRINTING ORDER PADS 53575 GRILL GENERAL SUPPLI 6467 < *> $179.31* 209020 04/04/00 $1,058.00 BRAUN INTERTEC, ENG. EVALUATION 187911 W 77TH ST PENT CIP < *> $1,058.00* 209021 04/04/00 $111.48 BRISSMAN- KENNEDY INC VAC REPAIRS 611297 CITY HALL GENE CLEANING SUPPL 04/04/00 $348.02 BRISSMAN- KENNEDY INC MOP, BOWL CLEANER, SI 620260 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 5727 < *> $459.50* 209022 04/04/00 $211.86 BRO -TEX INC RECYCLE ABSORB. MATER 228990 SUPERV. & OVRH HAZ. WASTE DIS 5946 < *> $211.86* 209023 04/04/00 - $62.77 Brock White 2/29/00 CREDIT BALANC CREDIT EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 04/04/00 $317.55 Brock White HOSE SET IN WRAP WL125669 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5653 < *> $254.78* 209024 04/04/00 $561.00 BROCKWAY, MAUREEN TEACHING AC 032400 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $561.00* 209025 04/04/00 $14,982.74 BRW INC. EAW - PREP FAIRVIEW .515 -0018 GENERAL FD PRO MISCELLANOUS < *> $14,982.74* 209026 04/04/00 $204.48 BUD LARSON SALES STREET BROOMS 731209 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 5445 < *> $204.48* 209027 04/04/00 $207.76 MOIR, BILLIE D NO PERMIT NEEDED FOR 022800 GENERAL FD PRO BUILDING PERMI < *> $207.76* 209028 04/04/00 $54.60 BUELL, KIM ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 031600 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $54.60* 209029 04/04/00 $100.00 Burtis, Bob BOB THE BEACHCOMBER 4 032700 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $100.00* 209030 04/04/00 $100.00 BUTLER, GEORGE POLICE SERVICE 040400 RESERVE PROGRA CONTR SERVICES < *> $100.00* 209031 04/04/00 $62.92 C &H Distributors Inc STORAGE BOXES 37409760 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 5766 < *> $62.92* 209032 04/04/00 $356.00 CAMPE, HARRIET TEACHING AC 032400 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $356.00* COUNCIL CHECK ­_dISTER 29 -MAR -2000 (14. -) page 5 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 209033 04/04/00 $1,215.96 Capital Factors Inc CLOTHING 1519718 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6220 < *> $1,215.96* 209034 04/04/00 $350.00 CARLSON, KENNETH CONTINUING ED -10 DAY 032300 POLICE DEPT. G CONY & SCHOOLS < *> $350.00* 209035 04/04/00 $286.09 CATCO HOOK & INSTALL KIT 3 -24458 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5651 04/04/00 $64.33 CATCO HOSE ENDS 1 -54747 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5657 04/04/00 $83.33 CATCO COUPLERS 3 -24781 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5657 04/04/00 $12.87 CATCO HOSE END 81 -22423 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5657 < *> $446.62* 209036 04/04/00 $1,230.00 CDW GOVERNMENT INC MODEMS & CABLES -KEYLE EP29267 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 7077 < *> $1,230.00* 209037 04/04/00 $284.18 CENTRAIRIE INC IGNITION MODULES 106313 FRED RICHARDS CONTR REPAIRS 6478 < *> $284.18* 209038 04/04/00 $100.00 CIRCUITWORKS MAINTENANCE- UPS SYST 2954 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP MAINT < *> $100.00* 209039 04/04/00 $127.91 CITY OF RICHFIELD NSP BILLING 9602122 GENERAL STORM LIGHT & POWER < *> $127.91* 209040 04/04/00 $375.00 CITY OF ROSEMOUNT MUNICI SPRING BANQUET 032700 CONTINGENCIES MEETING EXPENS < *> $375.00* 209041 04/04/00 $908.54 CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP PROX SWITHCES, LAMP, 40429 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 5816 < *> $908.54* 209042 04/04/00 $71.00 CLEVELAND GOLF GOLF BAGS 449050 S PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6218 04/04/00 $718.31 CLEVELAND GOLF GOLF CLUBS 449343 S PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6218 < *> $789.31* 209043 04/04/00 $24.99 TOWLE REAL ESTATE TOWLE REPORT 2000 031700 ASSESSING DUES & SUBSCRI < *> $24.99* 209044 04/04/00 $692.25 Commercial Furniture Bro 2 CHAIRS 00714979 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP REPLACEM 3152 04/04/00 $239.63 Commercial Furniture Bro REMODELING 00714985 CITY HALL EQUIP REPLACEM 4691 < *> $931.88* 209045 04/04/00 $67.03 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS SAFETY GLASSES, TAPE 01169214 GENERAL MAINT SAFETY EQUIPME 5761 04/04/00 $307.00 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS TOWELETTES, PODS, GLO 01179047 PUMP & LIFT ST SAFETY EQUIPME 5851 04/04/00 $87.06 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS BANDAIDS, RESPIRATORS 01181437 PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPLI 5892 < *> $461.09* 209046 04/04/00 $164.30 Construction Bulletin Ma AD FOR BID CB90315 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LE < *> $164.30* 209047 04/04/00 $436.72 CONSTRUCTION FASTENING S LOAD, PINS 34941 GENERAL MAINT TOOLS 5794 < *> $436.72* 209048 04/04/00 $1,176.65 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS I HOT POUR ASPHALT M050276 GENERAL MAINT ROAD OIL < *> $1,176.65* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER_ 29 -MAR -2000 (14:51) page 6 HECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 209049 04/04/00 $104.32 COPY EQUIPMENT INC. SURVEY PAINT 0159171 ENGINEERING GE GENERAL SUPPLI 4675 04/04/00 $41.35 COPY EQUIPMENT INC. PLOTTER CARTRIDGE 0159828 ENGINEERING GE BLUE PRINTING 4685 04/04/00 $21.01 COPY EQUIPMENT INC. BLUELINE PAPER 0159915 ENGINEERING GE BLUE PRINTING 4687 < *> $166.68* .209050 04/04/00 $3,000.00 CornerHouse ANNUAL FEES FOR PROF. 032700 POLICE DEPT. G PROF SERVICES < *> $3,000.00* 209051 04/04/00 $6.90 Corporate Express Delive COURIER 127063 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI 4648 < *> $6.90* 209052 04/04/00 $2,073.19 CROSS CREEK APPAREL INC UNIFORM SHIRTS CC358264 GOLF ADMINISTR GENERAL SUPPLI 6439 < *> $2,073.19* 209053 04/04/00 $612.33 Curtis 1000 OFFICE SUPPLIES 31323401 ART CENTER.ADM OFFICE SUPPLIE 9192 < *> $612.33* 209054 04/04/00 $59.03 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO. PARTS 108843 CENTENNIAL LAK REPAIR PARTS 2045 < *> $59.03* 209055 04/04/00 $637.88 CY'S UNIFORMS UNIFORM - BAGLEY 010700 FIRE DEPT. GEN UNIF ALLOW 3689 04/04/00 $9,048.00 CY'S UNIFORMS UNIFORMS 022900 -FIRE DEPT. GEN UNIF ALLOW < *> $9,685.88* 209056 04/04/00 .$407.00 D.C. ANNIS SEWER INC SUMP MAINTENANCE 12592 FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP MAINT 04/04/00 $324.00 D.C. ANNIS SEWER INC ANNUAL DRAIN MAINTENA 12622 FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP MAINT < *> $731.00* 209057 04/04/00 $73.75 DANKO EMERGENCY EQUIPMEN FAN GUARD 320243 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 3732 < *> $73.75* 209058 04/04/00 $445.90 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 89102 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 04/04/00 $1,178.75 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 89216 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 04/04/00 $508.80 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 89217 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 04/04/00 $51.00 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 89218 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 04/04/00 $435.05 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 89792 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 04/04/00 $339.95 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 89963 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 04/04/00 $18.40 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 89964 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 04/04/00 $926.00 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 89965 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 04/04/00 $169.00 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 90186 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 04/04/00 $77.50 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 90448 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE < *> $4,150.35* 209059 04/04/00 $822.51 DCA INC FEE FOR SERVICE 305273 CENT SVC GENER HOSPITALIZATIO < *> $822.51* 209060 04/04/00 $31.95 DEALER AUTOMOTIVE SERVIC REFRIGERANT 1- 015023 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5654 04/04/00 $59.35 DEALER AUTOMOTIVE-SERVIC DRIER, EXPANSION VALV 4- 047165 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 5801 < *> $91.30* 209061 04/04/00 $137.21 DELEGARD TOOL CO. PLATE, CAM, LABOR 220766 PUMP & LIFT ST TOOLS 5594 04/04/00 $19.32 DELEGARD TOOL CO. WHEEL WEIGHT HAMMER .229152 EQUIPMENT OPER TOOLS 5811 < *> $156.53* 209062 04/04/00 $43.30 DENNYS 5th AV BAKERY BAKERY 31306 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6329 COUNCIL CHECK i,- ,.SISTER 29 -MAR -2000 (14. page 7 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 209062 04/04/00 $26.48 DENNYS 5th AV BAKERY BAKERY 31557 GRILL COST OF GD.SOL 6329 04/04/00 $42.36 DENNYS 5th AV BAKERY BAKERY 31656 GRILL COST OF GD SOL-6329 < *> $112.14* 209064 04/04/00 $70.80 Department of Administat TELEPHONE W0001064 SKATING & HOCK TELEPHONE 04/04/00 $32.51 Department, of Administat TELEPHONE W0001064 COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 04/04/00 $60.04 Department of Administat'TELEPHONE W0001064 50TH ST OCCUPA TELEPHONE 04/04/00 $90.98 Department of Administat TELEPHONE W0001064 YORK OCCUPANCY TELEPHONE 04/04/00 $61.67 Department of Administat TELEPHONE W0001064 VERNON OCCUPAN TELEPHONE 04/04/00 $47.81 Department of Administat HISTORICAL W0001064 BUILDING MAINT TELEPHONE 04/04/00 $15.01 Department of Administat GREENHOUSE W0001064 BUILDING MAINT TELEPHONE 04/04/00 $29.16 Department of Administat CARD ACCESS -PARKS W0001064 BUILDING MAINT TELEPHONE 04/04/00 $30.02 Department of Administat TELEPHONE W0001064 SENIOR CITIZEN TELEPHONE 04/04/00 $44.60 Department of Administat TELEPHONE W0001064 POOL OPERATION TELEPHONE 04/04/00 $92.31 Department of Administat TELEPHONE W0001064 YORK FIRE STAT TELEPHONE 04/04/00 $75.05 Department of Administat TELEPHONE W0001064 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE 04/04/00 $111.98 Department of Administat TELEPHONE W0001064 ART CENTER BLD TELEPHONE 04/04/00 $234.89 Department of Administat TELEPHONE W0001064 ED ADMINISTRAT TELEPHONE 04/04/00 $14.58 Department of Administat TELEPHONE W0001064 ARENA BLDG /GRO TELEPHONE 04/04/00 $81.85 Department of Administat TELEPHONE W0001064 GOLF DOME TELEPHONE 04/04/00 $15.01 Department of Administat ARNESON W0001064 BUILDING MAINT TELEPHONE 04/04/00 $63.60 Department of Administat TELEPHONE W0001065 CLUB HOUSE TELEPHONE < *> $1,171.87* 209065 04/04/00 $460.51 DESHLER, BRANDON UNIFORM CLOTHING ALLO 032300 POLICE DEPT. G UNIF ALLOW < *> $460.51* 209066 04/04/00 $352.00 DIETRICHSON, BILL. TEACHING AC 032500 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $352.00* 209067' 04/04/00 $926.55 DISPLAY SALES CITY FLAG 848 POOL TRACK GRE GENERAL SUPPLI 2021 < *> $926.55* 209068 04/04/00 $280.86 DPD PRINTING 0011176- ARENA ADMINIST PRINTING 8070 < *> $280.86* 209069 04/04/00 $144.51 DRUMMOND AM.CORP OPEN & SHUT 5032368 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 5857 < *> $144.51* 209070 04/04/00 $452.39 E -Z Sharp Inc GENERAL SUPPLIES 4196 ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPLI 8066 < *> $452.39* 209071 04/04/00 $676.28 E -Z -GO TEXTRON GOLF CAR BATTERIES 0457180 GOLF CARS REPAIR PARTS 6533 04/04/00 $45.02 E- Z- GO- TEXTRON SWITCH /BEARINGS 0459420 CENTENNIAL LAK REPAIR PARTS 2044 04/04/00 $146.65 E -Z -GO TEXTRON REPLACEMENT LIGHTING 0463732 CENTENNIAL LAK REPAIR PARTS 2044 < *> $867.95* 209072 04/04/00 $486.60 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 189483 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/04/00 $75.42 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 189484 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/04/00 $378.57 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 189489 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF -GD WINE 04/04/00 $1,138.40 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 189495. YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/04/00 - $11.36 EAGLE WINE CREDIT FROM 3/16 STAT 9006953 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/04/00 $828.33 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 192396 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/04/00 $733.68. EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI'192400 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 04/04/00 $761.20 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 192404 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 29- MAR - 2000 (14:51) page 8 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 209072 04/04/00 $761.26 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 192405 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $5,152.10* 209073 04/04/00 $2,762.55 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 601995 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 04/04/00 $2,511.30 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 601996 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 04/04/00 $4,440.50 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 602583 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 04/04/00 $112.00 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 603144 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 04/04/00 $2,485.70 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 604975 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 04/04/00 $12.15 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 604976 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 04/04/00 $636.45 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 604978 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 04/04/00 $12.15 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 604979 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 04/04/00 $2,373.25 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF -GOODS SOLD BE 605535 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 04/04/00 $45.25 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 605536 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $15,391.30* 209074 04/04/00 $80.00 EDEN PRAIRIE COMMUNITY B PERFORMANCE 4 -16 032700 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $80.00* 209075 04/04/00 $68.38 EDMUNDS, LIZ BOTTLE BAGS 032000 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $68.38* 209076 04/04/00 $32.00. SCHIRMANG, KAREN WASTEWATER EXAM FEE R 032200 TRAINING LIC & PERMITS < *> $32.00* 209077 04/04/00 $1,008.40 EMBLEM ENTERPRISES INC. UNIFORM PATCHES 11 -8135 FIRE DEPT. GEN UNIF ALLOW 3748 < *> $1,008.40* 209078 04/04/00 $650.00 EMPLOYEES CLUB SUPPLIES 040400 CONTINGENCIES GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $650.00* 209079 04/04/00 $1,425.00 EnviorBate Metro ASBESTOS REMOVAL 14174 CITY HALL GENE CONTR REPAIRS 4670 < *> $1,425.00* 209080 04/04/00 $335.93 ENVIROMATIC CORPORATION GRILL DUCT CLEAN_ 82104 GRILL CONTR SERVICES 6463 < *> $335.93* 209081 04/04/00 $48.75 Erickson, Carl ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 031600 ART CNTR PROG SALE OF ART WO < *> $48.75* 209082 04/04/00 $200.00 Etcetera CONCERT 4 -17 032700 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $200.00* 209083 04/04/00 $263.30 EVERGREEN LAND SERVICES EASEMENT ACQUISITIONS 00 -256 SANITARY SEWER CIP < *> $263.30* 209084 04/04/00 $20,247.00 Falls Automotive.Inc 2 WHEEL DRIVE EXT. CA 4705 EQUIPMENT REPL EQUIP REPLACEM 5118 < *> $20,247.00* 209085 04/04/00 $45.00 FINE, AGNES ART DEMO 4 -9 032700 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $45.00* 209086 04/04/00 $625.33 FISHER SCIENTIFIC LAB SUPPLIES 3099566 LABORATORY GENERAL SUPPLI 5830 < *> $625.33* 209087 04/04/00 $1,092.10 FORRESTER'S CLOTHES 0097573- PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6214 J COUNCIL CHECK — LISTER 29 -MAR -2000 (14 , page 9 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <*> $1,092.10* 209088 04/04/00 $27.48 Franklin Covey DAY PLANNER INSERT 70192306 PARK MAINTENAN GENERAL SUPPLI 5709 < *> $27.48* 209089 04/04/00 $263.59 FREEWAY DODGE INC. MODULE PACKAGE 46424DOW EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5648 < *> $263.59* 209090 04/04/00 $804.00 Frey, Michael PROF.. SERV. AC 032400 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $804_.00* 209091 04/04/00 $247.53 G & K DIRECT PURCHASE UNIFORM PURCHASES 3039211 GENERAL MAINT LAUNDRY 04/04/00 $54.30 G & K DIRECT PURCHASE UNIFORM PURCHASES 3039657 BUILDING MAINT LAUNDRY 04/04/00 $28.72 G & K DIRECT PURCHASE UNIFORM PURCHASES 3040461 GENERAL MAINT LAUNDRY 04/04/00 $38.05 G & K DIRECT PURCHASE UNIFORM PURCHASES 3040468 PUMP & LIFT ST LAUNDRY 04/04/00 $83.22 G & K DIRECT PURCHASE UNIFORM PURCHASES 3040477 PUMP & LIFT ST LAUNDRY 04/04/00 $45.46 G & K DIRECT PURCHASE UNIFORM PURCHASES 3040477 GENERAL MAINT LAUNDRY 04/04/00 $32.61 G & K DIRECT PURCHASE UNIFORM PURCHASES 3040507 GENERAL MAINT. LAUNDRY 04/04/00 $24.84 G & K DIRECT PURCHASE UNIFORM PURCHASE 3041737 PUMP & LIFT ST LAUNDRY 04/04/00 $16.14 G & K DIRECT PURCHASE UNIFORM PURCHASE 3042020 GENERAL MAINT LAUNDRY < *> $570.87* 209092 04/04/00 $100.00 GAGLIARDIE, CELESTE ARCOBALANO THE CLOWN 032700 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $100.00* 209093 04/04/00 $1,340.62 GEAR for Sports CLOTHING 10152695 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6206 04/04/00 $1,527.44 GEAR for Sports CLOTHING 10155507 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6206 04/04/00 $1;532.31 GEAR for Sports CLOTHING 10155508 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6206 < *> $4,400.37* 209094 04/04/00 $158.84 GENERAL PARTS & SUPPLY GRILL ROLLERS 387178 GRILL GENERAL SUPPLI 6482 < *> $158.84* 209095 04/04/00 $237.45 Global Equipment OFFICE CHAIR - 80052423 PW BUILDING EQUIP REPLACEM 5432 < *> $237.45* 209096 04/04/00 $223.00 GOLFCRAFT PULL CART PARTS 13227 GOLF CARS REPAIR PARTS 6358 < *> $223.00* 209097 04/04/00 $71.36 GOPHER CASH REGISTER REGISTER SUPPLIES 21042 RANGE GENERAL SUPPLI 6450 < *> $71.36* 209098 04/04/00 $112.00 GOPHER STATE 1 CALL FEB. SERVICE 20259 SUPERV. & OVRH GOPHER STATE < *> $112.00* 209099 04/04/00 $138.07 GRAFIX SHOPPE LETTERING VEHICLES 10518 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 5643 < *> $138.07* 209100 04/04/00 $26.32 GRAINGER REPAIR PARTS 495 -4575 GOLF DOME REPAIR PARTS 6539 04/04/00 $81.47 GRAINGER WRAPAROUND FIXTURE 498 -2126 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 5770 04/04/00 $22.40 GRAINGER REPAIR PARTS 498 -2126 GOLF DOME' REPAIR PARTS- 6538 04/04/00 $50.40 GRAINGER REPAIR PARTS 973 -9875 GOLF DOME REPAIR PARTS 6538 04/04/00 $49.79 GRAINGER SHRINK FILM 495 -9259 LIFT STATION M GENERAL SUPPLI 5832 04/04/00 $7.93 GRAINGER GLOVES 495 -9259 LIFT STATION M GENERAL SUPPLI 5832 04/04/00 $178.44 GRAINGER MOTOR 970 -1095 TANKS TOWERS & REPAIR PARTS 5618 N COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 29 -MAR -2000 (14:51) page 10 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR . DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - - - - -- < *> $416.75* 209101 04/04/00 209102 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 209103 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 209104 04/04/00 209105 209106 209108 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 209109 04/04/00 209110 04/04/00 04/04/00 $338.50 Grand Pere Wines Inc $338.50* $306.00 $1,815.00 $363.00 $303.00 $671.00 $3,458.00* GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC $145.05 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. $654.53 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. $364.15. GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. $1,163.73* $40.00 GREEN, DICK $40.00* $225.00 GREER, PAT $225.00* $775.06 $6,000.00 $6,775.06* - $112.50 - $30.02 -$5.71 - $88.05 $2,429.51 $28.94 $45.88 $1,368.99 $85.80 $3,806.23 $153.00 $348.93 - $96.39 $3,015.95 $838.62 $944.25 $2,849.74 $15,583.17* GREUPNER, JOE GREUPNER, JOE GRIGGS COOPER & CO. GRIGGS COOPER & CO. GRIGGS COOPER & CO. GRIGGS COOPER & CO. GRIGGS COOPER & CO. GRIGGS COOPER & CO. GRIGGS COOPER & CO. GRIGGS COOPER & CO. GRIGGS COOPER & CO. GRIGGS COOPER & CO. GRIGGS COOPER & CO. GRIGGS COOPER & CO. GRIGGS COOPER & CO. GRIGGS COOPER & CO. GRIGGS COOPER & CO. GRIGGS COOPER & CO. GRIGGS COOPER & CO. $348.00 GRIPS FORE GOLF $348.00* $236.00 Groth Music $30.60 Groth Music $266.60* COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 00006845 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 30030 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 30031 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 30143 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 30178 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 30179 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE WIRE 104 -7045 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 5762 LIGHTS, BULBS 104 -7106 POOL TRACK GRE GENERAL SUPPLI 2220 ANCHORS, SWITCH, HAND 104 -7123 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 5839 ART DEMO 4 -20 032700 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER ART PROGRAMS FOR APRI 032700 ED ADMINISTRAT PROF SERVICES LESSON GIFT CERT. -CRE 031600 GOLF DOME GOLF DOME RECP APRIL 2000 RETAINER 032300 GOLF ADMINISTR PRO SVC - GOLF COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 532491 SOLD LI 532892 SOLD WI 533000 SOLD WI 533261 SOLD LI 189487 SOLD MI 189488 SOLD MI 189492 SOLD LI 189493 SOLD WI 189494 SOLD LI 189498 SOLD MI 191082 SOLD LI 191083 SOLD LI 533522 SOLD LI 192399 SOLD LI 192403 SOLD LI 192408 SOLD LI 192409 CLUB GRIPS 17623 DRUM CARRYING CASE 282296 MUSIC STAND PARTS KIT 298590 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST.OF GD LIQU YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6477 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI 7044 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI 7044 209111 04/04/00 $408.00 GUSTAFSON, KATHY TEACHING AC 032400 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $408.00* COUNCIL CHECK a,"GISTER 29- MAR - 2000 (14:- . page 11 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------•-------------- 209112 04/04/00 $580.00 H.U.G. REGISTRATION- HTE USE 031600 POLICE DEPT. G CONF.& SCHOOLS < *> $580.00* 209113 04/04/00 $750.06 HACH CO. LAB EQUIPT, NITRATE C 2281575 WATER TREATMEN GENERAL SUPPLI 5675 < *> $750.06* 209114 04/04/00 $35.00 HALL, MARILYN KIDS ART 4 -13 032700 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO•SVC OTHER < *> $35.00* 209115 04/04/00 $362.10 HALLMAN OIL COMPANY BULK OIL 32689 EQUIPMENT OPER LUBRICANTS 1760 04/04/00 $375.42 HALLMAN OIL COMPANY BULK 5W -30 OIL 32690 EQUIPMENT OPER LUBRICANTS 1760 < *> $737.52* 209116 04/04/00 $279.26 HALLOCK COMPANY INC MONITOR 300 -1537 LIFT STATION M REPAIR PARTS 5695 04/04/00 $18.15 HALLOCK COMPANY INC TAX ON PURCHASE 300 -1537 LIFT`STATION M REPAIR PARTS 5695 < *> $297.41* - 209117 04/04/00 $131.53 Hamco Data Products GENERAL SUPPLIES 201751 LIQUOR 50TH ST GENERAL SUPPLI 7514 < *> $131.53* 209118 04/04/00 $22,479.00 HARRIS HOMEYER CO. PREMIUM 13417 CENT SVC GENER INSURANCE 04/04/00 $14,760.00 HARRIS HOMEYER CO. PREMIUM 13418 CENT SVC GENER INSURANCE 04/04/00 $133.00 HARRIS HOMEYER CO. PREMIUM 13992 CENT SVC GENER INSURANCE 04/04/00 $1,033.00 HARRIS HOMEYER CO. PREMIUM 13993 CENT SVC GENER INSURANCE 04/04/00 $22,479.00 HARRIS HOMEYER CO. PREMIUM 13856 CENT SVC GENER INSURANCE 04/04/00 $14,760.00 'HARRIS HOMEYER CO. PREMIUM 13857 CENT SVC GENER INSURANCE < *> $75,644.00* 209119 04/04/00 $9,231.04 Hartland Fuel Products L GAS 338957 EQUIPMENT OPER GASOLINE 1217 < *> $9,231.04* _ 209.120 04/04/00 $279.21 Hawkeye Foodservice Dist CUP LIDS, TABLECLOTHS 1550284 GRILL GENERAL SUPPLI 6333 04/04/00 $223.53 Hawkeye Foodservice Dist GROCERIES 1554030 GRILL COST OF CD SOL 6333 04/04/00 $54.33 Hawkeye Foodservice Dist PAPER GOODS 1554030 GRILL GENERAL SUPPLI 04/04/00 $8.10 Hawkeye Foodservice Dist BLEACH 1554030 GRILL CLEANING SUPPL 04/04/00 $28.07 Hawkeye Foodservice Dist FOOD 1556846 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6333 < *> $593.24* 209121 04/04/00 $938.34 Hawkins Chemicals CHEMICAL TANK 242546 WATER TREATMEN GENERAL SUPPLI 5609 04/04/00 $958.02 Hawkins Chemicals CHEMICAL TANK 242626 WATER TREATMEN GENERAL SUPPLI 5309 04/04/00 $958.02 Hawkins Chemicals CHEMICAL TANK 242636 WATER TREATMEN GENERAL SUPPLI 5310 < *> $2,854.38* 209122 04/04/00 $147.00 HAYNES, PATRICIA TEACHING AC 032400 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES 04/04/00 $47.39 HAYNES, PATRICIA CRAFT SUPPLIES 032400 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES 04/04/00 $428.00 HAYNES, PATRICIA GALLERY PT 032400 ART SUPPLY GIF PROF SERVICES < *> $622.39* 209123 04/04/00 $112.00 HEDGES, DIANA CRAFT SUPPLIES 032400 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES < *> $112.00* 209124 04/04/00 $315.00 HELICOPTER FLIGHT INC DEER MANAGEMENT PROGR 11786 DEER CONTROL PROF SERVICES 5746 < *> $315.00* 209125 04/04/00 $2,264.74 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURE ROOM & BOARD 002626 LEGAL SERVICES BRD & RM PRISO COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 29 -MAR -2000 (14:51) page 12 HECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <*> $2,264.74* 209126 04/04/00 $100.00 HENNESSY, MICHAEL CREATIVE MIME 4 -13 032700 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $100.00* 209127 04/04/00 $13.61 HIRSHFIELDS WOOD PATCH, PAINT 00355380 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI 5855 < *> $13.61* 209128 04/04/00 $2,000.00 Ho, Jeffery D MEDICAL DIRECTOR SERV 040400 FIRE DEPT. GEN PROF SERVICES < *> $2,000.00* 209129 04/04/00 $343.57 HOBART CORP SERVICE CONTRACT STMT GRILL CONTR SERVICES 6336 < *> $343.57* 209130 04/04/00 $437.60 HOLIDAY INN CONTINUING ED. - K. C 032300 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $437.60* 209131 04/04/00 $70.01 HOLIDAY GAS PURCHASE 030800 EQUIPMENT OPER LUBRICANTS < *> $70.01* 209132 04/04/00 $159.36 Homberger, Jeff MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 031600 GOLF ADMINISTR MILEAGE < *> $159.36* 209133 04/04/00 $58.52 Home Enviroment Center WATER FILTRATION 2928 CITY HALL GENE CONTR REPAIRS 4688 < *> $58.52* 209134 04/04/00 $41.45 Home Juice COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 54310 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $41.45* 209135 04/04/00 $67.10 HOOTENS LAUNDRY 021500 POLICE DEPT. G LAUNDRY < *> $67.10* . 209136 04/04/00 $766.00 HOPKINS COMMUNITY EDUCAT WORD & EXCEL 1636 CENT SVC GENER DATA PROCESSIN < *> $766.00* 209137 04/04/00 $75.00 Hopkins Westwind Band PERFORMANCE 4 -9 032700 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $75.00* 209138 04/04/00 $447.67 KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT GENERAL SUPPLIES 0217 -417 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI 9174 04/04/00 $2.73 KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT GENERAL SUPPLIES 0217 -417 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI'9174 04/04/00 $53.59 KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT SPADE, SAW, BLADE 0217 -418 LIFT STATION M GENERAL SUPPLI 5777 04/04/00 - $34.06 KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT CREDIT RETURN 0217 -418 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 5249 04/04/00 $48.33 KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT MAX WHITE 0217 -418 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 5718 04/04/00 $148.55 KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT PLYWOOD, SCREWS 0217 -418 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 5720 04/04/00 $12.57 KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT LUMBER 0217 -418 BUILDING MAINT LUMBER 5721 04/04/00 $15.30 KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT LUMBER, DOWEL PIN 0217 -418 SNOW & ICE REM GENERAL SUPPLI 5795 04/04/00 $13.78 KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT ROLLERS, PAINT 0217 -419 STREET NAME SI GENERAL SUPPLI 5040 04/04/00 $73.79 KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT HAMMER DRILL SLUGGER 0217 -419 STREET REVOLVI GENERAL SUPPLI 5846 04/04/00 $34.39 KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT PAINT RAGS, BRUSH, DO 0217 -419 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI 5849 < *> $816.64* 209139 04/04/00 $9.03 HUEBSCH TOWELS, LINENS 986186 POOL TRACK GRE SVC.CONTR EQUI CONTRACT 04/04/00 $63.61 HUEBSCH TOWELS, LINENS 990739 POOL TRACK GRE SVC CONTR EQUI COUNCIL CHECK ...SISTER 29 -MAR -2000 (14:_ page 13 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 209140 04/04/00 $259.91 Ikon Office Solutions EQUIPMENT RENTAL 23603335 ART CENTER ADM EQUIP RENTAL < *> $259.91* 209141 04/04/00 $712.64 IMPERIAL HEADWEAR INC CLOTHING 441531 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6224 04/04/00 $258.50 IMPERIAL HEADWEAR INC CLOTHING 441933 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6224 < *> $971.14* .209142 04/04/00 $1,788.18 IN- Control PROGRAM CONTROLLER 847 PUMP & LIFT ST PROF SERVICES 5898 < *> $1,788.18* 209143 04/04/00 $136.53 INDELCO PLASTIC CORP PVC PIPE, CONNECTIONS 205595 BUILDING MAINT REPAIR PARTS 5739 < *> $136.53* 209144 04/04/00 $224.00 INTERLACHEN TRAVEL CONTINUING ED 114119 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS 04/04/00 $294.00 INTERLACHEN TRAVEL CONTINUING ED 114120 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $518.00* 209145 04/04/00 $878.40 ISFSI TRAINING MATERIAL 971794 FIRE DEPT. GEN TRAINING AIDS 3660 < *> $878.40* 209146 04/04/00 $55.54 J.H. LARSON COMPANY FLUORESCENT LAMPS 4164159- PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 5792 04/04/00 $113.15 J.H. LARSON COMPANY 500 FT REEL 4164201- ST LIGHTING OR GENERAL SUPPLI.5697 04/04/00 $271.88 J.H. LARSON COMPANY PLASTIC T'S, WIRE, RE 4165022- ST LIGHTING OR GENERAL SUPPLI 5856 04/04/00 5 $309.9J.H. LARSON COMPANY CORD, MALE PLUG, CONN 4165481- PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 5935 < *> $750.52* 209147 04/04/00 $263.11 JACK RICHESON & CO INC BRUSHES 0162189- ART SUPPLY GIF COST OF GD SOL,9181 < *> $263.11* 209148 04/04/00 $100.00 JAMES, WILLIAM F POLICE SERVICE 040400 RESERVE PROGRA CONTR-SERVICES < *> $100.00* 209149 04/04/00 $83.69 JERRY'S FOODS COST OF GOODS SOLD 032700 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 04/04/00 $79.78" JERRY'S FOODS CLEANING SUPPLIES 032700 FIRE DEPT. GEN CLEANING SUPPL 04/04/00 $77.39 JERRY'S FOODS GENERAL SUPPLIES 032700 ART CENTER ADM GENERAL SUPPLI_ < *> $240.86* 209150 04/04/00 $1,909.55 JERRY'S PRINTING PRINTING SPRING SCHED A -13613 ART CENTER ADM PRINTING 9171 < *> $1,909.55* 209151 04/04/00 $412.73 JIM HATCH SALES STROBE LIGHTS 1175 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 5961 < *> $412.73* 209152 04/04/00 $87.95 Johns, Richard REIMBURSE FOR UNIFORM 032300 POOL TRACK GRE LAUNDRY < *> $87.95* 209156 04/04/00, - $11.50 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 115976 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 04/04/00 -$3.83 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 115977 50TH'ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 04/04/00 $46.00 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 1089786 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 04/04/00 - $33.79 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 116124 VERNON SELLING CST -OF GD WINE 04/04/00 - $133.28 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 116125 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 04/04/00 $482.76 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1091219 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/04/00 - $42.94 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 116252 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/04/00 -$8.00 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR "COST OF GOODS-SOLD WI 116253 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/04/00 -$6.33 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 116254 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 29 -MAR -2000 (14:51) page 14 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 209156 04/04/00 -$3.46 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 116255 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/04/00 - $118.70 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 116256 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/04/00 $6,048.66 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1092222 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 04/04/00 $912.36 JOHNSON.BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1092223 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/04/00 $21.77 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1092224 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 04/04/00 $3,446.63 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1092225 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/04/00 $6,067.53 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1092404 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 04/04/00 $1,839.61 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1092405 50TH ST SELLIN.CST OF GD LIQU 04/04/00 $250.84 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1092406 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/04/00 $89.07 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 1092407 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 04/04/00 $612.48 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1092408 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 04/04/00 $165.28 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1092409 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 04/04/00 $1,773.66 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1092410 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/04/00 $918.26 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1094741 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/04/00 $2,892.40 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1094742 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 04/04/00 $2,498.92 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1094743 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/04/00 $199.59 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 1094744 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 04/04/00 $211.15 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1094746 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 04/04/00 $1,814.54 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1094747 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 04/04/00 $305.43 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1094748 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 04/04/00 $34.69 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 1094749 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 04/04/00 $4,380.62 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1094750 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 04/04/00 $231.08 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1094751 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/04/00 $2,887.58 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1094752 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU' 04/04/00 $113.21 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1094753 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/04/00 $708.53 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1094754 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 04/04/00 $682.82 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1094755 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/04/00 $742.43 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1094756 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/04/00 $145.95 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 1095453 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 04/04/00 $561.75 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1095454 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/04/00 $8,843.12 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1095455 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU < *> $49,566.89* 209157 04/04/00 $145.83 JOHNSON, NAOMI CRAFT SUPPLIES 032400 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES < *> $145.83* 209158 04/04/00 $128.42 JOHNSON, NAOMI CRAFT SUPPLIES 032400 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES 04-/04/00 $12.17 JOHNSON, NAOMI GENERAL SUPPLIES 032400 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI 04/04/00 $16.20 JOHNSON, NAOMI MEDIA GEN. SUPP. 032400 MEDIA LAB GENERAL SUPPLI 04/04/00 $6.00 JOHNSON, NAOMI MEDIA CRAFT SUPPLIES 032400 MEDIA LAB CRAFT SUPPLIES < *> $162.79* 209159 04/04/00 $100.00 JOHNSON,. WALTER POLICE SERVICE 040400 RESERVE PROGRA CONTR SERVICES < *> $100.00* 209160 04/04/00 $10.00 JURGENS, TAMRA SAFETY CAMP REFUND 031300 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F < *> $10.00* 209161 04/04/00 $164.85 JUSTUS LUMBER LUMBER, SHIMS 46978 BUILDING MAINT LUMBER 5248 04/04/00 $468.37 JUSTUS LUMBER STAPLE, PLYWOOD 47199 BUILDING MAINT LUMBER 5253 04/04/00 $37.86 JUSTUS LUMBER LUMBER 47754 SNOW & ICE REM GENERAL SUPPLI 5759 04/04/00 $109.12 JUSTUS LUMBER CAULK, PLYWOOD 48166 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 5717 04/04/00 $100.00 JUSTUS LUMBER PLYWOOD 48642 BUILDING MAINT LUMBER 5722 04/04/00 $145.14 JUSTUS LUMBER LUMBER 48743 ART CENTER BLD LUMBER 5799 04/04/00 $96.83 JUSTUS LUMBER PLYWOOD, LUMBER 48866 BUILDING MAINT LUMBER 5724 COUNCIL CHECK .,_SISTER 29 -MAR -2000 (14:: page 15 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION- - INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 209161 04/04/00 $13.12 JUSTUS LUMBER LUMBER 48901 ART CENTER BLD LUMBER 5833 < *> $1,135.29* 209162 04/04/00 $79.21 KANE, KENNETH UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 031700 POLICE DEPT. G UNIF ALLOW < *> $79.21* 209163 04/04/00 $113.28 KAR PRODUCTS SHOP SUPPLIES 849633 MAINT OF LOURS GENERAL SUPPLI 6550 < *> $113.28* 209164 04/04/00 $96.00 Keenan, Lori TEACHING AC 032400 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $96.00* 209165 04/04/00 $1,948.00 Kiwi Kai Imports Inc COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 126458 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/04/00 $663.70 Kiwi Kai Imports Inc COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 126462 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 04/04/00 $764.75 Kiwi Kai Imports Inc COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 126525 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/04/00 $655.15 Kiwi Kai Imports Inc COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 126526 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 04/04/00 $1,325.29 Kiwi Kai Imports Inc COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 126527 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/04/00 $1,641.00 Kiwi Kai Imports Inc COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 126852 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/04/00 $480.00 Kiwi Kai Imports Inc COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 126853 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 04/04/00 $446.00 Kiwi Kai Imports Inc COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 126854 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 04/04/00 $1,334.90 Kiwi Kai Imports Inc COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 126856 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/04/00 $1,200.00 Kiwi Kai Imports Inc COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 126881 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE < *> $10,458.79* 209166 04/04/00 $252.00 KOCHENASH, RICK. TEACHING AC 032400 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $252.00* 209167 04/04/00 $96.25 KOJETIN, BOB REIMBURSEMENT FOR SAW 032300 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL'SUPPLI < *> $96.25* 209168 04/04/00 $1,427.00 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 263412 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 04/04/00 $36.00 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 263434 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 04/04/00 $1,097.95 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 263511 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 04/04/00 $300.10 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 264016 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 04/04/00 $592.35 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 264087 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE < *> $3,453.40* 209169 04/04/00 $362.50 KUNDE CO INC OAK WILT CONTROL SERV 006211 TREES & MAINTE PROF SERVICES CONTRACT < *> $362.50* 209170 04/04/00 $29.00 KUYPER, SCOTT CONTINUING ED 031400 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $29.00* 209171 04/04/00 $100.00 LACASSE, ANDREW J-. KIT AND KABODDLE 4 -4 032700 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $100.00* 209172 04/04/00 $50.00 LAKE COUNTRY CHAPTER MEMBERSHIP 032300 INSPECTIONS DUES & SUBSCRI < *> $50.00* 209173 04/04/00 $362.57 LAKELAND ENGINEERING 3 -WAY VALVE 12052899 PUMP & LIFT ST REPAIR PARTS 5790 < *> $362.57* 209174 04/04/00 $36.00 Lands' End Corporate Sal LOGO SHIRTS 01099621 LIQUOR 50TH ST GENERAL SUPPLI 04/04/00 $111.10 Lands' End Corporate Sal LOGO SHIRTS 01099621.LIQUOR YORK GE GENERAL SUPPLI 04/04/00 $42.60 Lands' End Corporate Sal LOGO SHIRTS 01106254 LIQUOR 50TH ST GENERAL SUPPLI COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 29 -MAR -2000 (14:51) page 16 HECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------ <*> $189.70* 7 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 209175 04/04/00 $92.55 Lathrop Paint Supply Com PAINT 753937 STREET NAME SI PAINT 5768 04/04/00 $172.85 Lathrop Paint Supply Com TEFLON O- RING, PAINT 753939 STREET NAME SI GENERAL SUPPLI 5320 04/04/00 $136.62 Lathrop Paint Supply Com PAINT 754166 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 5798 04/04/00 $4.65 Lathrop Paint Supply Com PAINT BRUSHES 754173 'PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 5798 < *> $406.67* 209176 04/04/00 $205.79 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. SILICONE SEAL, TY -RAP 1273568 PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPLI 5781 04/04/00 $291.54 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. WASHERS, TY -RAP, FITT 1274516 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5782 04/04/00 $143.21 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. HEX NUTS, RACK, BOLTS 1274517 BUILDING MAINT LUMBER 5783 04/04/00 $71.23 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. STRIPE PAINT 1278535 ST LIGHTING OR GENERAL SUPPLI 5842 04/04/00 $31.66 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. TOGGLE SWITCH 1278536 PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPLI 5845 04/04/00 $16.70 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. METAL DRAWER, STAND 1278537 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 5843 04/04/00 $392.61 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. PUSH ON HOSE,. ADAPTOR 1279404 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 5841. 04/04/00 $421.29 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. TY -RAP, RIVETS, WASHE 1279405 STREET NAME SI GENERAL SUPPLI 5844 04/04/00 $72.73 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. TROUBLE LIGHT 1279406 STREET'NAME SI GENERAL SUPPLI 5844 < *> $1,646.76* 209177 04/04/00 $246.66 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA HUMA DUES 011800 HUMAN RELATION DUES & SUBSCRI < *> $246.66* 209178 04/04/00 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITI LMC DIRCTORY 032700 ADMINISTRATION BOOKS & PAMPHL < *> _$33.02 $33.02* 209179 04/04/00 $47.58 LEEF BROS. INC. FLOOR MATS 199036 ART CENTER BLD LAUNDRY < *> $47.58* 209180 04/04/00 $524.61 LHB ENGINEERS & ARCHITEC HOUSE DISTRESS EVALUA 0000001 UG STORAGE TAN CIP < *> $524.61* 209181 04/04/00 $749.42 LITTLE FALLS MACHINE TUBES, TORSION SPRING 00023572 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5527 < *> $749.42* 209182 04/04/00 $365.65 ADT SECURITY SYSTEMS GARBAGE PICKERS 29 LITTER REMOVAL GENERAL SUPPLI 5708 < *> $365.65* 209183 04/04/00 $250.00 MAAO HELP WANTED ADS 031000 CENT SVC GENER ADVERT PERSONL < *> $250.00* 209184 04/04/00 $183.16 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. NUT LOCK, SHOULDER BO 2002318 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5680 04/04/00 $84,959.31 -MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. STREET SWEEPER 1000103 EQUIPMENT REPL EQUIP REPLACEM 5429 04/04/00 $552.27 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. POLY BROOM 2002397 STREET CLEANIN BROOMS 5442 04/04/00 $237.47 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. HOSE 2002373 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 5862 04/04/00 $157.62 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. MANDREL 2002697 STREET CLEANIN BROOMS 5853 < *> $86,089.83* 209185 04/04/00 $101.18 Marcom Direct INFORMATIONAL CARDS 1101 COMMUNICATIONS CONTR SERVICES < *> $101.18* 209187 04/04/00 $727.75 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 124441 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 04/04/00 $946.35 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 124442 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 04/04/00 $1,336.32 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 124452 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 04/04/00 $51.50 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 124453 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 04/04/00 $1,076.18 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 126725 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE COUNCIL CHECK _ .jISTER AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 04/04/00 6216 04/04/00 POOL TRACK 209191 04/04/00 FLWR 29 -MAR -2000 (14:. page 17 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT 04/04/00 FLWR VENDOR 2297 DESCRIPTION POOL INVOICE PROGRAM 04/04/00 OBJECT 04/04/00 PO NUM --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 209187 04/04/00 $15.20 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 126726 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 04/04/00 $909.60 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 126915 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 04/04/00 $723.33 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 126916 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 04/04/00 $1,362.05 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 127076 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 04/04/00 $1,916.65 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 127090 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 04/04/00 $27.00 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 127091 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 04/04/00 $132.00 MARK VII SALES BEER 128820 GRILL CST OF GDS BEE 6337 04/04/00 $972.65 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 129453 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 04/04/00 $36.00 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 129454 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 04/04/00 $44.00 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 129455 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $10,276.58* 209188 04/04/00 $512.44 MARLIN COMPANY, THE SAFETY /COMM. POSTERS 10056 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 5207 < *> $512.44* 209189 04/04/00 $157.21 MATHISON CO, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD 400229 -0 ART SUPPLY GIF COST OF GD SOL 9180 < *> $157.21* 209190 04/04/00 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 04/04/00 6216 04/04/00 POOL TRACK 209191 04/04/00 FLWR SHR 209192 04/04/00 POOL 04/04/00 GRE 04/04/00 FLWR 04/04/00 2297 04/04/00 POOL TRACK 209193 04/04/00 FLWR 04/04/00 2289 12508 209194 04/04/00 GRE 04/04/00 FLWR SHR 209195 04/04/00 POOL TRACK 209196 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 209197 04/04/00 209198 04/04/00 $49.00 $182.00 $49.00 $280.00* $660.23 $660.23* $653.26 $853.48 $606.40 $964.24 $956.79 $4,034.17* $29.00 $104.11 $133.11* $57.00 $1,649.36 $1,706.36* $942.58 $942.58* $27.48 $143.32 $25.20 $196.00* Matrix Communications In UPDATE FOR 952/763 0041076- CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE Matrix Communications In POLICE CHARGES 0041111- CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE Matrix Communications In POLICE CHARGES 0041142- CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE MAXFLI GOLF DIVISION MCCAREN DESIGN MCCAREN DESIGN MCCAREN DESIGN MCCAREN DESIGN MCCAREN DESIGN MCKENZIE, TOM MCKENZIE, TOM GOLF BALLS FLOWERS, PLANTS PLANTS, FLOWERS FLOWERS FLOWERS, PLANTS FLOWERS, PLANTS 2141780 PRO SHOP AMBULANCE SUPPLIES COST OF GDS -PR 6216 12262 POOL TRACK GRE TREES FLWR SHR 2257 12491 POOL TRACK GRE TREES FLWR SHR 2297 12494 POOL TRACK GRE TREES FLWR SHR 2289 12508 POOL TRACK GRE TREES FLWR SHR 2210 12511 POOL TRACK GRE TREES FLWR SHR 2206 CONTINUING ED 031400 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS UNIFORM CLOTHING ALLO 032300 POLICE DEPT. G UNIF ALLOW MDS Matrx Medical Inc AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 687290 B FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 3662 MDS Matrx Medical Inc AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 695157 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 3785 MEDICA CHOICE AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 032700 GENERAL FD PRO AMBULANCE FEES MENARDS * ACCT #30240251 SUPPLIES 76684 MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPLI 6547 MENARDS * ACCT #30240251 SUPPLIES 76840 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI 2049 MENARDS * ACCT #30240251 REPAIR PARTS 77565 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 6552 $466.60 Mercury Waste Solutions LIGHT DISPOSAL $466.60* $100.00 MERFELD, BURT POLICE SERVICE $100.00* 286040 50TH STREET RU PROF SERVICES 040400 RESERVE PROGRA CONTR SERVICES COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 29 -MAR -2000 (14:51) page 18 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 209199 04/04/00 $992.85 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 53173 ARENA BLDG /GRO CLEANING SUPPL 8067 04/04/00 $360.32 MERIT SUPPLY GOLF CAR WASH 53175 GOLF CARS GENERAL SUPPLI 6537 04/04/00 $896.68 MERIT SUPPLY STONETHANE, SHAMPOOS, 53177 POOL TRACK GRE CLEANING SUPPL 2299 04/04/00 $201.02 MERIT SUPPLY REPAIR PRESSURE WASHE 53180 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 5784 04/04/00 $717.54 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 53227 ARENA BLDG /GRO CLEANING SUPPL 8075 04/04/00 $657.11 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 53228 ARENA BLDG /GRO CLEANING SUPPL 8076 04/04/00 $224.72 MERIT SUPPLY DEGREASER, CLEANERS 53243 PW BUILDING CLEANING SUPPL 5848 04/04/00 $336.86 MERIT SUPPLY LINERS, SOAP 53258 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES 5829 04/04/00 $316.22 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 53311 ARENA BLDG /GRO CLEANING SUPPL 8079 < *> $4,703.32* 209200 04/04/00 $216.66 METRO AREA PROMOTIONS CO ADVERTISING FOR CITY 10440 50TH ST SELLIN ADVERT OTHER 04/04/00 $216.67 METRO AREA PROMOTIONS CO ADVERTISING FOR CITY 10440 YORK SELLING ADVERT OTHER 04/04/00 $216.67 METRO AREA PROMOTIONS CO ADVERTISING FOR CITY 10440 VERNON SELLING ADVERT OTHER < *> $650.00* 209201 04/04/00 $371.42 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY LINE MARKERS, PAINT 41687 FIELD MAINTENA GENERAL SUPPLI 5731 < *> $371.42* 209202 04/04/00 - $395.00 METRO SALES INC Overpaid 015007 C GOLF ADMINISTR PRINTING 04/04/00 - $123.98 METRO SALES INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 015007 C GOLF ADMINISTR GENERAL SUPPLI 04/04/00 $395.00 METRO SALES INC Reverse Credit 015007 C GOLF ADMINISTR PRINTING 04/04/00 $123.98 METRO SALES INC Reverse Credit 015007 C GOLF ADMINISTR GENERAL SUPPLI 04/04/00 $500.00 METRO SALES INC COPIER, SERV. CONTRAC 036806 GOLF ADMINISTR SVC CONTR EQUI 6481 < *> $500.00* 209203 04/04/00 $70.50 Metro Volley Ball Offici OFFICIATING FEES 1818 EDINA ATHLETIC PROF SERVICES 04/04/00 $29.50 Metro Volley Ball Offici OFFICIATING FEES 1825 EDINA ATHLETIC PROF SERVICES < *> $100.00* 209204 04/04/00 $61.11 METZGER, MAURE ANN ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 031600 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $61.11* 209205 04/04/00 $394.00 MEUWISSEN, MARY TEACHING AC 032400 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $394.00* 209206 04/04/00 $641.22 MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPLY LINERS, NAPS, T.T., T 18442 CITY HALL GENE PAPER SUPPLIES 4684 < *> $641.22* 209207 04/04/00 $121.40 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI COKE 66407182 FRED RICHARDS COST OF GD SOL 6327 04/04/00 $100.96 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 62136135 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 04/04/00 $.191.95 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 62140152 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 04/04/00 $266.00 MIDWEST COCA_ -COLA BOTTLI COST OF.GOODS SOLD MI 65801081 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $680.31* 209208 04/04/00 $22.00 MIKE'S SHOE REPAIR INC. GEAR REPAIRS 021700 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONTR REPAIRS < *> $22.00* 209209 04/04/00 $58.50 Mill City Printworks ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 031600 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $58.50 *. 209210 04/04/00 $230.99 MILWAUKEE ELECTRIC TOOL MOTOR ASSEMBLY 955469 GENERAL MAINT TOOLS 5772 < *> $230.99* 209211 04/04/00 $8.49 Minn Blue Digital -A AMMONIA FOR OZALID 040831 ENGINEERING GE BLUE PRINTING 4674 COUNCIL CHECK .__SISTER 29 -MAR -2000 (14:. page 19 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT. VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 209211 04/04/00 $16.17 Minn Blue Digital -A NEUTRALIZER FOR OZALI 041521 ENGINEERING GE GENERAL SUPPLI 4674 < *> $24.66* 209212 04/04/00 $95.5.50 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN S REPLACE SERVICE 31696 DISTRIBUTION CONTR REPAIRS 5838 04/04/00 $814.50 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN S REPLACE SERVICE LINE 31697 DISTRIBUTION CONTR REPAIRS 5698 < *> $1,770.00* 209213 04/04/00 $110.00 BRASK, JAY FOOD MANAGERS CERTIFI 031400 GOLF ADMINISTR CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $110.00* 209214 04/04/00 $119.59 MINNESOTA BAR SUPPLY BAR SUPPLIES 30445800 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 04/04/00 $25.83 MINNESOTA BAR SUPPLY PLASTIC NUMBERS 30449600 LIQUOR YORK GE GENERAL SUPPLI 04/04/00 $100.07 MINNESOTA BAR SUPPLY BAR SUPPLIES 30476700 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 04/04/00 $516.69 MINNESOTA BAR SUPPLY BAGS & BOWS 30595500 LIQUOR YORK GE GENERAL SUPPLI 04/04/Ob- $9.00 MINNESOTA BAR SUPPLY SHOT GLASSES 30595500 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $771.18* 209215 04/04/00 $180.00 Minnesota Chapter IAAI CONFERENCE FEE - JENS 1004 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONF & SCHOOLS 3786 04/04/00 $180.00 Minnesota Chapter IAAI CONFERENCE FEE - MEDZ 1005 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONF & SCHOOLS 3786 < *> $360.00* 209216 04/04/00 $82.02 MINNESOTA CLAY USA CRAFT SUPPLIES 54546 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES 9149 04/04/00 $122.40 MINNESOTA CLAY USA GENERAL SUPPLIES 54546 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $204.42* 209217 04/04/00 $650.00 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF WATER SCHOOL 031700 TRAINING CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $650.00* 209218 04/04/00 $620.00 MINNESOTA SAFETY COUNCIL CLASSES 002.904 TRAINING CONE & SCHOOLS 5692 < *> $620.00* 209219 04/04/00 $25.00 Minnesota State Board of ELECTRICAL PERMITS 041400 INSPECTIONS GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $25.00* 209220 04/04/00 $115.68_ MINNESOTA WANNER WELD PUMP HEAD, TIP 0043657- SKATING RINK M CONTR REPAIRS 5804 < *> $115.68* 209221 04/04/00 $20.00 Mitchell /Repair Informat SHIPPING CHARGES FOR 5726546 EQUIPMENT OPER DATA PROCESSIN 5861 < *> $20.00* 209222 04/04/00 $3,689.10 Mizuno USA Inc GLOVES /CLUBS 0231534 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6360 04/04/00 $394.97 Mizuno USA Inc CLUBS 0231535 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6360 04/04/00 $246.76. Mizuno USA Inc GOLF BAGS 0237583 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6360 04/04/00 $544.00 Mizuno USA Inc GOLF CLUBS 0241232 PRO-SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6360 < *> $4,874.83* 209223 04/04/00 $143.44 MMBA TRAINING MANUAL 032700 LIQUOR YORK GE DUES & SUBSCRI 7530 < *> $143.44* 209224 04/04/00 $129.60 Mohler Chimney Repair DUPLICATE PERMIT ED994690 GENERAL FD PRO BUILDING PERMI < *> $129.60* 209225 04/04/00 $150.00 MPELRA DUES 032700 ADMINISTRATION DUES & SUBSCRI < *> $150.00* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 29 -MAR -2000 (14:51) page 20 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 209226 04/04/00 $250.00 Minneapolis Community & CONTINUING ED 00 -080 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $250.00* 209227 04/04/00 $195.96 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO WIPER MOTOR 749 -00 CENTENNIAL LAK REPAIR PARTS 2009 04/04/00 $12.31 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO KEY SWITCH 808 -00 CENTENNIAL LAK REPAIR PARTS 2009 04/04/00 $159.22 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO RIMS FOR MOWER 4050 -00 CENTENNIAL LAK REPAIR PARTS 2041 04/04/00 $285.42 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO REPAIR PARTS 4169 -00 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 6535 04/04/00 $83.81 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO IRRIG. REPAIR PARTS 2751 -00 MAINT OF COURS IRRIGATION EQU 6543 04/04/00 $52.83 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO REPAIR PARTS 4169 -01 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 6535 04/04/00 $27_.43 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO REPAIR PARTS 5071 -00 MAINT OF LOURS REPAIR PARTS 6548 < *> $816.98* 209228 04/04/00 $155.15 National Camera Exchange CRAFT SUPPLIES 0301001N ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES 9172 < *> $155.15* 209229 04/04/00 $40.00 NATIONAL PUBLIC PARKS ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP 030600 TENNIS INSTRUC DUES & SUBSCRI < *> $40.00* 209230 04/04/00 $27.63 NELSON, BARBARA ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 031600 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER 04/04/00 $273.00 NELSON, BARBARA TEACHING AC 032400 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES 04/04/00 $528.00 NELSON, BARBARA TEACHING MEDIA CTR 032400 MEDIA LAB PROF SERVICES < *> - $828.63* 209231 04/04/00 $23.40 NELSON, CHRISTINE ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 031600 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $23.40* 209232 04/04/00 $100.00 NISSEN, DICK POLICE SERVICE 040400 RESERVE PROGRA CONTR SERVICES < *> $100.00* 209233 04/04/00 $45.00 NORMAN, POLLY TEACHING AC 032400 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $45.00* 209234 04/04/00 $163.20 NORTH STAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 21007317 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 04/04/00 $174.20 NORTH STAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 21007318 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 04/04/00 $53.04 NORTH STAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 27008007 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 04/04/00 $19.72 NORTH STAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 27008008 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $410.16* 209235 04/04/00 $68.79 NORTH STAR TURF REPAIR PARTS 220504 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 6521 04/04/00 $165.18 NORTH STAR TURF REPAIR PARTS 220524 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 6527 04/04/00 $18.30 NORTH STAR TURF REPAIR PARTS 220546 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 6536 04/04/00 $9.02 NORTH STAR TURF REPAIR PARTS 220630 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 6540 04/04/00 $47.99 NORTH STAR TURF REPAIR PARTS 220939 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 6536 04/04/00 $91.15 NORTH STAR TURF REPAIR PARTS 221077 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 6544 04/04/00 $271.46 NORTH STAR TURF REPAIR PARTS 221117 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 6527 < *> $671.89* 209236 04/04/00 $350.00 SIEMS, JEFFERY COMMAND SCHOOL CSIL -005 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $350.00* 209237 04/04/00 $28.72 Northern Tool & Equipmen TIE DOWN AUTO LOCK 3286425 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 5893 < *> $28.72* 209238 04/04/00 $178.69 Northland Chemical Corp ODOR CONTROL 044949 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 5714 < *> $178.69* COUNCIL CHECK _jISTER 29 -MAR -2000 (14: page 21 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM - OBJECT-- - - - -PO -NUM --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 209239 04/04/00 $207.04 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY COST OF GOODS.SOLD 17139000 ART SUPPLY GIF COST OF GD SOL 9179 04/04/00 $103.55 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY LIQUITEX GESSO 17153400 ART SUPPLY GIF COST OF GD SOL 9184 04/04/00 $416.20 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY CLASSIC I BLACK COMP 17175700 ART SUPPLY GIF COST OF GD SOL 9188 < *> $72.6.79* 209240 04/04/00 $113.77 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES NW -61628 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI 2043 04/04/00 $28.41 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRE REPAIR NW -61629 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES &'TUBES 5644 04/04/00 $150.04 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES NW =61630 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES. 5939 04/04/00 $228.08 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES NW -61751 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES 5644 < *> $520.30* 209241 04/04/00 $200.00 NYHLENS FILTER RECYCLING 55 GAL. DRUMS, FILTER 8617 SUPERV. & OVRH HAZ. WASTE DIS 5655 < *> $200.00* 209242 04/04/00 $172.00 OUTDOOR DESIGNS MAILBOX 031000 SNOW & ICE REM GENERAL SUPPLI 5789 < *> $172.00* 209243 04/04/00 $378.07 OWENS SERVICE CO < *> $378.07 *. LABOR FOR BAD MOTORS 38851 209244 ,04/04/00 $55.38 P.S.E. ENTERPRISES GENERAL SUPPLIES < *> $55.38* 209245 04/04/00 $480.17 Paging Network of Minnes EQUIPMENT RENTAL 04/04/00 $684.74 Paging Network of Minnes PAGER RENTAL < *> $1,164.91* 209246 209247 209248 209250 2548 POOL TRACK GRE CONTR REPAIRS 2209 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI 3171 031000 POLICE DEPT'. G EQUIP RENTAL 00052229 FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP RENTAL 04/04/00 $160.96 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 43807097 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX $160.96* 04/04/00 $202.73 PERFORMING ARTS MAIL& M BULK MAIL 031000 1 CENT SVC GENER POSTAGE 9193 $202.73* 04/04/00 $935.00 ' PERKINS LANDSCAPE CONTRA REDESIGN OF 26TH HOLE 030800 MAINT OF COURS SHARED MAINT 6546 $935.00* 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 $222.22 - $75.09 - $22.09 $623.45 $528.93 $3,374.85 $1,042.65 $30.47 $1,201.29 $509.23 $653.70 $772.42 $206.86 $1,231.23 $792.89 $4,814.54 $761.93 $1,407.04 $18,076.52* PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE& SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 585490 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 3211344 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 3211475 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 589242 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 589243 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 589244 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 589361 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 589362 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 589363 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 589364 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 5893.65 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 591255 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 591256 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 591257 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 591258 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 591259 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 591260 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 591261 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 50TH ST SELLIN CST-OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 29 -MAR -2000 (14:51) page 22 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 209251 04/04/00 $45.50 Phillips, Linda ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 031600 ART CNTR PROG SALE OF ART WO < *> $45.50* 209252 04/04/00 $145.68 Ping CAPS 4338442 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6307 < *> $145.68* 209253 04/04/00 - $27.96 Pinnacle Distributing COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 28558 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 04/04/00 $477.21 Pinnacle Distributing COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 28619 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 04./04/00 $17.25 Pinnacle Distributing GENERAL SUPPLIES 28620 LIQUOR YORK GE GENERAL SUPPLI 04/04/00 $531.24 Pinnacle Distributing COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 28644 �VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 04/04/00 $335.52 Pinnacle Distributing COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 28683 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 04/04/00 $126.00 Pinnacle Distributing COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 28704 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 04/04/00 $109.60 Pinnacle Distributing COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 28706 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 04/04/00 $178.84 Pinnacle Distributing COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 28719 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 04/04/00 $633.68 Pinnacle Distributing COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 28845 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX. 04/04/00 $307.56 Pinnacle Distributing COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 28891 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX < *> $2,688.94* 209254 04/04/00 $3,651.92 Polo Ralph Lauren Corpor CLOTHING 828941 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6202 < *> $3,651.92* 209255 04/04/00 - $240.00 Polo Ralph Lauren WW Gol Merchandise 073 -0932 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6201 04/04/00 $72.40 Polo Ralph Lauren WW Gol Merchandise 073 -0493 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6201 04/04/00 $405.75 Polo Ralph Lauren WW Gol CLOTHING 073 -0497 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6201 04/04/00 $1,357.23 Polo Ralph Lauren WW Gol CLOTHING 073 -0497 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6201 04/04/00 $600.66 Polo Ralph Lauren WW Gol CLOTHING 073 -0497 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6201 04/04/00 $176.68 Polo Ralph Lauren WW Gol CLOTHING 073 -0497 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6201 < *> $2,372.72* 209256 04/04/00 $860.00 POSTMASTER BULK MAIL 032400 CENT SVC GENER POSTAGE < *> $860.00* 209257 04/04/00 $10,000.00 Premier Aggregates Inc RECYCLE AGGREGATES EDI -201 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLI 5423 04/04/00 $8,573.75 Premier Aggregates Inc CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDI -201 STREET RENOVAT CONTR REPAIRS < *> $18,573.75* 209258 04/04/00 $131.04 Prestige Flag GOLF FLAGS 52526 MAINT OF LOURS GENERAL SUPPLI 6526 04/04/00 $148.81 Prestige Flag GOLF FLAGS 52690 MAINT OF LOURS GENERAL SUPPLI 6526 < *> $279.85* 209260 04/04/00 -$2.71 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 531842 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/04/00 -$7.00 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 533001 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/04/00 $715.00 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 188426 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/04/00 $53.30 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 189485 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/04/00 $1,219.42 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 189486 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/04/00 $314.90 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 189490 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 04/04/00 $614.15 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 189491 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 04/04/00 $53.30 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 189496 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/04/00 $2,498.55 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 189497 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/04/00 $1,.425.80 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 192397 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/04/00 $271.40 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 192398 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/04/00 $511.07 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 192401 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 04/04/00 $130.20 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 192402 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 04/04/00 $1,056.88 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 192406 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/04/00 $257.40 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 192407 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE COUNCIL CHECK .- _jISTER 29 -MAR -2000 (14:_ page 23 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ < *> $9,111.66* - 209261 04/04/00 $6,364.48 PROGRESSIVE CONSULTING E WATER TREATMENT PLANT 99022.10 UTILITY PROG CIP < *> $6,364.48* 209262 04/04/00 $5.00 Protection One SECURITY SYSTEM - ARN 030700 BUILDING MAINT PROF SERVICES 7079 < *> $5.00* 209263 04/04/00 $195.00 PRYOR RESOURCES CONTINUING ED. 1883605 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $195.00* 209264 04/04/00 $136.96 PSC Supply CLEANING SUPPLIES 7317 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 5246 < *> $136.96* 209265 04/04/00 $69.76 Quinlan Publishing Group LEGAL BRIEFINGS FOR F 031400 FIRE DEPT. GEN DUES & SUBSCRI < *> $69.76* 209266 04/04/00 $156.94 R & R Products Inc. REPAIR PARTS 00000239 MAINT OF LOURS REPAIR PARTS 6542 < *> $156.94* 209267 04/04/00 $35.00 RAAB, STEPHEN SKATING LESSON REFUND 032700 EDINB /CL PROG LESSON PRGM IN < *> $35.00* 209268 04/04/00 $225.00 RADIO SPORTS DUES 031600 ARENA ADMINIST DUES & SUBSCRI 8058 < *> $225.00* 209269 04/04/00 $70.00 RAVELL, RHONDA SKATING LESSONS REFUN 031500 EDINB /CL PROG LESSON PRGM IN < *.> $70.00* 209270 04/04/00 $15.06 RDO Equipment Cc CAP 109751 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5859 < *> $15.06* 209271 04/04/00 $138.45 RDO Truck Center BRACKET 22006600 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR 'PARTS 5639 04/04/00 $40.26 RDO.Truck Center BOLT 22007501 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5805 < *> $178.71* 209272 04/04/00 $2,286.54 RED WING SHOES SAFETY SHOES 1258 GENERAL MAINT SAFETY EQUIPME 04/04/00 $945.90 RED WING SHOES SAFETY SHOES 1258 BUILDING MAINT SAFETY EQUIPME 04/04/00 $76.00 RED WING SHOES SAFETY SHOES 1258 PUMP & LIFT ST SAFETY•EQUIPME 04/04/00 $106.25 RED WING SHOES SAFETY BOOTS 1273 GOLF ADMINISTR.SAFETY EQUIPME < *> $3,414.69* 209273 04/04/00 $801.00 RICKERT, DAVID TEACHING AC 032400 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $801.00* 209274 04/04/00 $374.41 ROBERT B. HILL REPAIR 00095941 ARENA BLDG /GRO CONTR REPAIRS 8073 < *> $374.41* 209275 04/04/00 $173.70 ROCHESTER MIDLAND SANITATION 00199050 GRILL CONTR SERVICES 6341 < *> $173.70* 209276 04/04/00 $101.12 SAFETY KLEEN BRAKE CLEANER 00011722 SUPERV. & OVRH HAZ. WASTE DIS 5860 < *> $101.12* 209277 04/04/00 $328.68 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT COMMER MONITOR, FILM, SUPPLI 031400 PUMP &-'LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPLI COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 29 -MAR -2000 (14:51) page 24 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------=------------------.------------------------ <*> $328.68* 209278 04/04/00 $32.20 Sanco Cleaning Supplies GENERAL SUPPLIES 68741 LIQUOR YORK GE GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $32.20* 209279 04/04/00 $45.00 Sauro, Marie TEACHING AC 032400 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES . < *> $45.00* 209280 04/04/00 $115.00 SCHATTAUER, JIM MISTER JIM 4 -6 032700 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $115.00* 209281 04/04/00 $29.25 Scheel, Wade ART WORK .SOLD AT EAC 031600 ART CNTR PROG SALE OF ART WO < *> $29.25* 209282 04/04/00 $201.13 SCHMITZ, THOMAS MISC. SUPPLIES REIMBU 032100 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $201.13* 209283 04/04/00 $1,533.60 SEARS TOOLS 6231429 EQUIPMENT OPER TOOLS 5032 04/04/00 $285.17 SEARS WRENCH, PL_IER, NUTDRI 1090998 EQUIPMENT OPER TOOLS 5503 04/04/00 $90.18 SEARS WRENCH 2428079 LIFT STATION M TOOLS 5203 04/04/00 $24.84 SEARS FILTERS 6226152 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 5011 04/04/00 $277.37 SEARS COMPRESSOR, FILTER NU 1429533 STREET REVOLVI GENERAL SUPPLI 5151 04/04/00 $36.94 SEARS WRENCH 2428482 EQUIPMENT OPER TOOLS 5220 < *> $2,248.10* 209284 04/04/00 $40,333.20 SEH STREET DESIGN SERVICE 0060705 W 77TH ST PENT CIP 04/04/00 $42,452.80 SEH ENG. DESIGN SERVICES 0061929 TH100 & W 77TH CIP 04/04/00 $976.60 SEH WELLHEAD PROTECTION P 0062427 GENERAL(BILLIN PROF SERVICES < *> $83,762.60* ,209285 04/04/00 $32.50 Seifert, Elizabeth ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 031600 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $32.50* 209286 04/04/00 $824.32 ServiceMaster DISINFECT AFTER SEWER 1619 SEWER TREATMEN CONTR REPAIRS 5493 < *> $824.32* 209287 04/04/00 $5,390:62 SGN COMFORT STATION DESIG 1609 PKBOND CIP PROF SERVICES CONTRACT < *> $5,390.62* 209288 04/04/00 $100.00 SHEPARD, JOHN POLICE SERVICE 040400 RESERVE PROGRA CONTR SERVICES < *> $100.00* 209289 04/04/00 $128.66 SHERWIN WILLIAMS PRIMER, SEALER, BRUSH 5743 -9 LIFT STATION M PAINT 5678 < *> $128.66* 209290 04/04/00 $85.00 SIGNAL SYSTEM GENERAL SUPPLIES 67638 ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPLI 8071 < *> $85.00* 209291 04/04/00 $135.00 Silvers, Roxanne TEACHING AC 032400 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $135.00* 209292 04/04/00 $85.60 SIMS SECURITY SECURITY 00379859 POOL TRACK GRE PROF SERVICES 04/04/00 $85.60 SIMS_SECURITY SECURITY 00398170 POOL TRACK GRE PROF SERVICES < *> $171.20* COUNCIL CHECK _jISTER 29 -MAR -2000 (14:_ page 25 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION -INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 209293 04/04/00 $183.47 Sir Speedy Print PRINTING 26637 ED ADMINISTRAT PRINTING 2030 < * >_ $183.47* 209294 04/04/00 $50.79 SNOEYENBOS, CHRISTIAN AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 032700 GENERAL FD PRO AMBULANCE FEES < *> $50.79* 209295 04/04/00 $140.74 SOKKIA MEASURING SYSTEM SURVEYING MISC. 6017314R ENGINEERING GE GENERAL SUPPLI 4673 < *> $140.74* 209296 04/04/00 $758.45 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 104803 50TH ST.SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 04/04/00 $2,813.90 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 104806 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 04/04/00 $48.80 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 104807 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 04/04/00 $2,012.20 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 105074 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE < *> $5,633.35* 209297 04/04/00 $348.00 Spooner, Anne TEACHING AC 032400 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $348.00* 209298 04/04/00 $984.44 SPORT - HALEY INC. CLOTHING 201862 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6200 04/04/00 $141.92 SPORT - HALEY INC. CLOTHING 202540 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6200 < *> $1,126.36* 209299 04/04/00 $470.00 SPORTSIGN DISPLAY BOARD 29477 PATHS & HARD S GENERAL SUPPLI 5711 < *> $470.00* 209300 04/04/00 $35.34 SPS PLUMBING PARTS 3448193 CLUB HOUSE REPAIR PARTS. 6451 04/04/00 $323.16 SPS SWITCH KIT, WRENCH, L 3456524 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 5895 < *> $358:50* 209301 04/04/00 $788.97 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC CONSULTING DESIGN 3268 -11 W 77TH ST PENT CIP 04/04;/00 $1,093.81 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC TRAFFIC SIGNAL DESIGN 3269 -7 COMPUTER & 77T CIP 04/04/00 $450.00 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC TRAFFIC CALMING STUDY 3564 -6 CONTINGENCIES PROF SERVICES 04/04/00 $1,600.40 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC TRAFFIC SIGNAL DESIGN 3682 -1 VERNON & GLEAS CIP < *> $3,933.18* .209302 04/04/00 $100.00 St Paul Czechoslovak Fol PERFORMANCE 4 -2 032700 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $100.00* 209303 04/04/00 $91.01 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO LINING KIT, SEAL, WAS SI86742 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5823 < *> $91.07* 209304 04/04/00 $90.00 STATE TREASURER STATE CODES SPRING SE 032300 INSPECTIONS CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $90.00* 209305 04/04/00 $30.94 STEPP MFG CO INC PHOTO ELEC EYE, NOZZL 18312 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 5822 < *> $30.94* 209306 04/04/00 $35.00 Stouten, Jaqueline KIDS ART 4 -18 032700 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $35.00* 209307 - 04/04/00 $549.95 STREICHERS UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 129241.2 POLICE DEPT. G UNIF ALLOW 04/04/00 $24.95 STREICHERS GENERAL SUPPLIES 144951.1 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI 04/04/00 $24.95 STREICHERS GENERAL SUPPLIES 145196.1 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI 04/04/00 $22.78 STREICHERS GENERAL SUPPLIES 155202.1 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI 04/04/00 - $16.83 STREICHERS GENERAL SUPPLIES 157003.1 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 29 -MAR -2000 (14:51) page 26 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <*> $605.80* 209308 04/04/00 $100.00 Strohmyer, Tom WONDERFUL WORLD OF WO 032700 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $100.00* 209309 04/04/00 $260.00 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR ROOF HOLES, RE CVCB3672 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5835 < *> $260.00* 209310 04/04/00 $309.57 SUBURBAN PROPANE LP FUEL 031700 ARENA ICE MAIN GASOLINE 8081 < *> $309.57* 209312 04/04/00 $46.20 Sun Newspapers PUBLISH ORD 850 -A16 299365 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LE 04/04/00 $71.40 Sun Newspapers ADVERTISING LEGAL 299368 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LE 04/04/00 $40.60 Sun Newspapers PUBLISH ORD 2000 -4 299369 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LE 04/04/00 $92.25 Sun Newspapers AD FOR BID 299876 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LE 04/04/00 $197.05 Sun Newspapers AD FOR BID 304433 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LE 04/04/00 $96.53 Sun.Newspapers AD FOR BID 304434 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LE 04/04/00 $80.44 Sun Newspapers P.H. NOTICE 304435 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LE 04/04/00 $39.32 Sun Newspapers P.H. NOTICE 304473 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LE 04/04/00 $85.80 Sun Newspapers P.H. NOTICE 306752 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LE 04/04/00 $85.80 Sun Newspapers P.H. NOTICE 306753 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LE 04/04/00 $112.61 Sun Newspapers P.H. NOTICE 306755 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LE 04/04/00 $215.00 Sun Newspapers AD 307086 50TH ST SELLIN ADVERT OTHER 04/04/00 $215.00 Sun Newspapers AD 307086 YORK SELLING ADVERT OTHER 04/04/00 $215.00 Sun Newspapers AD 307086 VERNON SELLING ADVERT OTHER < *> $1,593.00* 209313 04/04/00 $1,143.47 SUNDE LAND SURVEYING INC EASEMENT PREPARATION 25635 W 77TH ST PENT CIP < *> $1,143.47* 209314 04/04/00 $208.00 SUNDIN, JEROME -TEACHING AC 032400 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $208.00* 209315 04/04/00 $874.00 SUNDIN, ROSALIE MEDIA PROF. SERV. 032400 MEDIA LAB PROF SERVICES < *> $874.00* 209316 04/04/00 $14,286.00 SUPERIOR FORD ADMIN. CAR 12664 INSPECTIONS EQUIP REPLACEM 5434 < *> $14,286.00* 209317 04/04/00 $100.00 SWANSON, HAROLD POLICE SERVICE 040400 RESERVE PROGRA CONTR SERVICES < *> $100.00* 209318 04/04/00 $31.93 TARGET LAMP 83906 PRO SHOP GENERAL SUPPLI 6452 04/04/00 $10.63 TARGET FRAMES 96420 GOLF ADMINISTR GENERAL SUPPLI 6452 < *> $42.56* 209319 04/04/00 $400.00 Taylor Technologies Inc COMPUTER TRAINING - J 14237 ENGINEERING GE CONF & SCHOOLS 4669 < *> $400:00* 209320 04/04/00 $50.00 TAYLOR, AMY REFUND FOR ROOM RENTA 032000 GOLF PROG RENTAL OF PROP < *> $50.00* 209321 04/04/00 $200.00 TCALMC MEMBERSHIP 0.32700 ADMINISTRATION DUES & SUBSCRI < *> $200.00* COUNCIL CHECK _jISTER 29 -MAR -2000 (14:. page 27 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INVOICE - - - - - - - - - PROGRAM - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OBJECT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PO NUM - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - 209322 - - - - - - - - - - - 04/04/00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - $190.26 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - TEAM MARKETING COMPANY I - - - LAMINATING POUCHES 68372 POOL TRACK GRE GENERAL SUPPLI 2205 < *> $190.26* 209323 04/04/00 $110.14 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO CONVOLUTED LOOM, DUPL 23764 -00 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5813 < *> $110.14* 209324 04/04/00 $100.00 That's Entertainment PERFORMANCE 4 -6 032700 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $100.00* 209325 04/04/00 $52.25 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 187731 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 04/04/00 $1,484.00 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 187745 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 04/04/00 $334.00 _ THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP BEER 188247 GRILL CST OF GDS BEE 6345 04/04/00 $2,454.75 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 188297 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 04/04/00 $12.10 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 188298 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $4,337.10* 209326 04/04/00 $1,995.36 TITLEIST GOLF BALLS 2828131 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6210 04/04/00 $905.04 TITLEIST GOLF BALLS 2829695 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6210 04/04/00 $3,290.00 TITLEIST GOLF BALLS 2831832 PRO SHOP COST OF.GDS -PR 6210 04/04/00 $3,993.12 TITLEIST GOLF BALLS 2841567 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6210 < *> $10,183.52* 209327 04/04/00 $30.61 TODD, DARRELL MEALS FOR INTERVIEW P 032100 FIRE,DEPT. GEN MEETING EXPENS < *> $30.61* 209328 04/04/00 $100.00 TOUCH OF MAGIC, A BE A CLOWN WITH HALF 032700 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $100.00* 209329 04/04/00 $750.00 TOWN & COUNTRY FENCE FENCE REPAIR AT PARK 6740 PATHS & HARD S CONTR REPAIRS 5743 < *> $750.00* 209330 04/04/00 $54.93 Treuting, Kristen ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 031600 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $54.93* 209331 04/04/00 $25.00 TURF SUPPLY CONFERENCE EXP. 074003 MAINT OF COURS CONF & SCHOOLS 6551 .04/04/00 $135.92 TURF SUPPLY COURSE ACCESORIES 074083 MAINT_OF LOURS GENERAL SUPPLI 6549 < *> $160.92* 209332 04/04/00 $227.60 TWIN CITY CONCRETE PRODU PORTLAND CEMENT 00000114 GENERAL STORM GENERAL SUPPLI 5796 < *> $227.60* '.209333 04/04/00 $101.30 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO GARAGE DOOR CABLE 095452 STREET REVOLVI GENERAL SUPPLI 5837 < *> $101.30* 209334 04/04/00 $49.25 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO OXYGEN 534011 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 3700 04/04/00 $118.72 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO OXYGEN SUPPLIES 534662 FIRE.DEPT. GEN. FIRST AID SUPP 3700 < *> $167.97* 209335 04/04/00 $194.66_ U S BANCORP HARDWARE FOR CABINETS 031300 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $194.66* 209336 04/04/00 $957.44 U S BANCORP COUCH - DAY ROOM STAT 032200 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $957.44* 209337 04/04/00 $287.81 UNIMED MIDWEST INC. AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 0010958 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 3747 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 29 -MAR -2000 (14:51) page 28 HECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <*> $287.81* 209338 04/04/00 $393.46 United Electric CEILING MOUNT 52741200 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 5773 < *> $393.46* 209339 04/04/00 $195.46 United States Filter Cor GENERAL SUPPLIES 0396443 ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPLI 8047 04/04/00 $390.92 United States Filter Cor GENERAL SUPPLIES 0409631 ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPLI 8074 < *> $586.38* 209340 04/04/00 $59.50 UNITED STORES SAFETY BOOTS 42010 BUILDING MAINT SAFETY EQUIPME 5730 < *> $59.50* 209341 04/04/00 $33.55 Unlimited Supplies Inc STAINLESS POSTS 00032701 STREET NAME SI GENERAL SUPPLI 5498 < *> $33.55* 209342 04/04/00 $61.77 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 03/19 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE 04/04/00 $61.43 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 031900 SKATING & HOCK TELEPHONE 04/04/00 $57.24 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 032200 PUMP & LIFT ST TELEPHONE < *> $180.44* 209343 04/04/00 $397.53 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 031100 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE < *> $397.53* 209344 04/04/00 $697.58 VAN PAPER CO. TRASH BAGS 308513 POOL TRACK GRE GENERAL SUPPLI 2048 < *> $697.58* 209345 04/04/00 $13.00 VAN SLOUN, C.J. PLAYGROUND PROGRAM RE 032000 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F < *> $13.00* 209346 04/04/00 $660.30 VESSCO MANUAL PUMP, STRAINER 20982 DISTRIBUTION REPAIR PARTS 5858 < *> $660.30* 209347 04/04/00 $428.93 Voss Lighting HALOGEN LIGHTS 2061448- BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 5685 04/04/00 $49.04 Voss Lighting FLUORESCENT LAMPS 2062062- YORK OCCUPANCY REPAIR -PARTS 5793 < *> $477.97* 209348 04/04/00 $54.20 WALSER FORD SW ASSEMBLY, TURN SIG 81639FOW EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5652 04/04/00 $38.36 WALSER FORD LAMP ASSEMBLY 81534FOW EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5641 04/04/00 $63.78 WALSER FORD LINK ASSEMBLY 81774FOW EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5802 < *> $156.34* 209349 04/04/00 $100.00 WALSH, WILLIAM POLICE SERVICE 040400 RESERVE PROGRA CONTR SERVICES < *> $100.00* 209350 04/04/00 $286.38 WALT DISNEY WORLD _ ANNUAL HTE GROUP CONY 031600 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $286.38* 209351 04/04/00 $648.00 WENZEL, KENNETH TEACHING AC 032400 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $648.00* 209352 04/04/00 $34.03 WEST PHOTO SEAMLESS DULL ALUM. 91159 MEDIA LAB COST OF GD SOL 9166 < *> $34.03* 209353 04/04/00 $368.27 WEST WELD SUPPLY CO. ELECTRODES, GRINDING 30077 EQUIPMENT OPER WELDING SUPPLI 5775 04/04/00 $323.05 WEST WELD SUPPLY CO. DRILL BITS, LUBRICANT 30255 EQUIPMENT OPER TOOLS 5831 209357 04/04/00 209358 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 OF GOODS 209359 04/04/00 10055 04/04/00 CST 04/04/00 GD COUNCIL CHECK ._-vISTER 04/04/00 SOLD 04/04/00 27160 29 -MAR -2000 (14:- page 29 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <*> 04/04/00 $691.32* WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 27168 209354 04/04/00 $130.00 SCHIRMANG, JOHN ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 031600 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER SOLD < *> 27373 $130.00* CST OF GD WINE COST OF GOODS 209355 04/04/00 $156.64 WILLIAMS STEEL SPRAY PAINT 903895 -0 PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPLI 5847 < *> SOLD $156.64* 27375 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 209356 04/04/00 $225.00 WILSON SPORTING GOODS CO GOLF BALLS 2221962 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6210 032400 04/04/00 $121.80 WILSON SPORTING GOODS CO GOLF BALLS 2221963 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6210 04/04/00 $1,429.20 WILSON SPORTING GOODS CO GOLF BALLS 2227725 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6209 < *> $1,776.00* 209357 04/04/00 209358 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 209363 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 209364 04/04/00 $49.95 $49.95* - $64.95 $304.75 $601.10 $333.40 $1,938.05 $678.64 $528.75 $51.00 $440.75 $4,812.09* - $132.69 $877.65 $636.83 $508.14 $1,121.97 $921.83 $1,128.04 $5,061.77* WindowsNT WINE COMPANY, THE WINE COMPANY, THE WINE COMPANY, THE WINE COMPANY, THE WINE COMPANY, THE WINE COMPANY, THE WINE COMPANY, THE WINE COMPANY, THE WINE COMPANY, THE WINE MERCHANTS WINE MERCHANTS WINE MERCHANTS WINE MERCHANTS WINE MERCHANTS WINE MERCHANTS WINE MERCHANTS $312.93 WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY $312.93* $192.00 $192.00* $40.95 $40.95* $1,281.70 $758.90 $550.00 $264.00 $140.00 $436.70 $3,431.30* Wolfe, Kay WOLPERS, KENNY WORLD CLASS WINES INC WORLD CLASS WINES INC WORLD CLASS WINES INC WORLD CLASS WINES INC WORLD CLASS WINES INC WORLD CLASS WINES INC $100.00 WROBLESKI, HENRY $100.00* MAGAZINE SUBSCRIPTION 864757 MEDIA LAB DUES & SUBSCRI COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 036356 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 036532 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 036642 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 036643 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 036644 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 036980 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 036981 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 037016 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 037061 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE. 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE COST OF GOODS 209359 04/04/00 10055 04/04/00 CST 04/04/00 GD 04/04/00 COST 04/04/00 SOLD 04/04/00 27160 04/04/00 CST OF 209360 04/04/00 COST OF GOODS 209361 04/04/00 27167 50TH ST SELLIN 209362 04/04/00 GD WINE 209363 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 04/04/00 209364 04/04/00 $49.95 $49.95* - $64.95 $304.75 $601.10 $333.40 $1,938.05 $678.64 $528.75 $51.00 $440.75 $4,812.09* - $132.69 $877.65 $636.83 $508.14 $1,121.97 $921.83 $1,128.04 $5,061.77* WindowsNT WINE COMPANY, THE WINE COMPANY, THE WINE COMPANY, THE WINE COMPANY, THE WINE COMPANY, THE WINE COMPANY, THE WINE COMPANY, THE WINE COMPANY, THE WINE COMPANY, THE WINE MERCHANTS WINE MERCHANTS WINE MERCHANTS WINE MERCHANTS WINE MERCHANTS WINE MERCHANTS WINE MERCHANTS $312.93 WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY $312.93* $192.00 $192.00* $40.95 $40.95* $1,281.70 $758.90 $550.00 $264.00 $140.00 $436.70 $3,431.30* Wolfe, Kay WOLPERS, KENNY WORLD CLASS WINES INC WORLD CLASS WINES INC WORLD CLASS WINES INC WORLD CLASS WINES INC WORLD CLASS WINES INC WORLD CLASS WINES INC $100.00 WROBLESKI, HENRY $100.00* MAGAZINE SUBSCRIPTION 864757 MEDIA LAB DUES & SUBSCRI COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 036356 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 036532 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 036642 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 036643 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 036644 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 036980 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 036981 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 037016 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 037061 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE. 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 10055 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 27160 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 27167 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 27168 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 27373 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 27374 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 27375 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE DISPLAYS W46986 PRO SHOP GENERAL SUPPLI 6438 TEACHING AC 032400 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 032700 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 91531 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 91532 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 91597 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 91764 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 91765 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 91841 PARK ADMIN. MILEAGE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE POLICE SERVICE 040400 RESERVE PROGRA CONTR SERVICES COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 29 -MAR -2000 (14:51) page 30 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 209365 04/04/00 $950.19 Xerox Corporation COPIER MONTHLY FEE. 07392140 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI 3413 < *> $950.19* 209366 04/04/00 $191.96 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE SAFETY SUPPLIES 54065286 ARENA ADMINIST SAFETY.EQUIPME 8077 04/04/00 $23.00 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE FIRST AID NEEDS 54065287 GOLF DOME SAFETY EQUIPME 6468 04/04/00 $100.05 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE DRUG SUPPLIES 54163353 CITY HALL GENE - GENERAL SUPPLI 4692 < *> $315.01* 209367 04/04/00 $1,105.80 ZIEGLER INC BRACKET PC000290 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5510 < *> $1,105.80* 209368 04/04/00 $359.00 ZINN, BOBO TEACHING.AC 032400 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES 04/04/00 $168.68 ZINN, BOBO CRAFT SUPPLIES 032400 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES < *> $527.68* $710,918.88* COUNCIL CHECK - -AMARY 29 -MAR -2000 (14. page 1 -- - - FUND - - - # - - - - - - 10 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GENERAL FUND - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - $317,543.64 FUND # 12 COMMUNICATIONS $144.95 FUND # 15 WORKING CAPITAL $1,913.67 FUND # 23. ART CENTER $15;899.79 FUND # 25 GOLF DOME FUND $1,687.62. FUND # 26 SWIMMING POOL FUND $44.60 FUND # 27 GOLF COURSE FUND $55,116.45 FUND # 28 ICE ARENA FUND $5,203.87 FUND # 30 EDINBOROUGH /CENTENNIAL LAK $11,521.12 FUND # 40 UTILITY FUND $29,815.26 FUND # 41 STORM SEWER UTILITY FUND $355.51 FUND.# 50 LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND $175,814.22 FUND # 60 CONSTRUCTION FUND $90,467.56 FUND # 61 PARK BOND FUND $5,390.62 $710,918.88* 208516 03/06/00 208517 03/06/00 208518 03/06/00 208519 03/06/00 208520 03/06/00 208521 03/06/00 208523 03/06/00 03/06/00 03/06/00 03/06/00 03/06/0.0 03/06/00 03/06/00 03/06/00 03/06/00 03/06/00 03/06/00 03/06/00 03/06/00 03,/06/00 03/06/00 03/06/00 03/06/00 0- 3/06/00 03/06/00 208524 03/06/00 208525 03/06/00 208526 03/06/00 $3.29 $3.29* $2,069.02 $2,069.02* $97.46 $97.46* $774.00 $774.00* $250.00 $250.00* $58.52 $58.52* $5,111.97 $2,594.19 X4,695.28 $248.62 $725.23 $70.46 $5,141.19 $2,669.48 $4,722.14 $6,185.73 $250.04 $283.45 $2,541.48 $166.19. $141.73 $1,713.36 $771.54 $956.65 $37,166.00 $76,154.73* $90.00 $90.00* $18.82 $18.82* $19.62 AT &T BAY WEST COMPUSA INC TELEPHONE 021800 ED ADMINISTRAT TELEPHONE Removal of Hazardous OOS -0002 BUILDING MAINT PROF SERVICES 5199 Computer Supplies 90399938 GOLF ADMINISTR OFFICE SUPPLIE 4558 Don Harstad Co Inc Keyless Entry System 114439 BUILDING MAINT PROF SERVICES 7076 Effective Marketing Com Historical Column- Ab COUNCIL CHEC._ REGISTER MAG /NEWSLET EX Home Enviroment.Center Water Filtration 2788 29 -MAR -2000 (_ 61) page 1 CHECK NO CHECK DT CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM - OBJECT PO NUM. ----------------------------------------------------------------------.-------------------------------------------------------------- 208513 03/06/00 $20.00 ACCA -MN Energy Code Seminar 030600 , INSPECTIONS CONF & SCHOOLS < *> DATA $20.00* AR1299 DATA - AR1299 208514 03/06/00 $27.83 Airtouch Cellular Belle TELEPHONE 022000 ED ADMINISTRAT TELEPHONE < *> AR1299 $27.83* AR1299 DATA PROCESSING AR1299 208515 03/06/00 $106.50 - Aqua Pure Inc. Water Filtration 30376. -13 CITY HALL GENE CONTR REPAIRS 4665 < *> $106.50* 208516 03/06/00 208517 03/06/00 208518 03/06/00 208519 03/06/00 208520 03/06/00 208521 03/06/00 208523 03/06/00 03/06/00 03/06/00 03/06/00 03/06/0.0 03/06/00 03/06/00 03/06/00 03/06/00 03/06/00 03/06/00 03/06/00 03/06/00 03,/06/00 03/06/00 03/06/00 03/06/00 0- 3/06/00 03/06/00 208524 03/06/00 208525 03/06/00 208526 03/06/00 $3.29 $3.29* $2,069.02 $2,069.02* $97.46 $97.46* $774.00 $774.00* $250.00 $250.00* $58.52 $58.52* $5,111.97 $2,594.19 X4,695.28 $248.62 $725.23 $70.46 $5,141.19 $2,669.48 $4,722.14 $6,185.73 $250.04 $283.45 $2,541.48 $166.19. $141.73 $1,713.36 $771.54 $956.65 $37,166.00 $76,154.73* $90.00 $90.00* $18.82 $18.82* $19.62 AT &T BAY WEST COMPUSA INC TELEPHONE 021800 ED ADMINISTRAT TELEPHONE Removal of Hazardous OOS -0002 BUILDING MAINT PROF SERVICES 5199 Computer Supplies 90399938 GOLF ADMINISTR OFFICE SUPPLIE 4558 Don Harstad Co Inc Keyless Entry System 114439 BUILDING MAINT PROF SERVICES 7076 Effective Marketing Com Historical Column- Ab 228 COMMUNICATIONS MAG /NEWSLET EX Home Enviroment.Center Water Filtration 2788 CITY HALL GENE CONTR REPAIRS 4663 LOGIS LOGIS LOGIS LOGIS LOGIS LOGIS LOGIS LOGIS LOGIS LOGIS LOGIS LOGIS, LOGIS LOGIS LOGIS LOGIS LOGIS LOGIS LOGIS MN P.O.S. T. PERA PERA DATA PROCESSING AR1199 DATA PROCESSING AR1199 DATA.PROCESSING AR1199 DATA PROCESSING AR1199 DATA PROCESSING AR1199 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AR1199 DATA PROCESSING AR1299 DATA PROCESSING AR1299 DATA PROCESSING AR1299 DATA PROCESSING AR1299 DATA PROCESSING AR1299 DATA PROCESSING AR1299 DATA PROCESSING AR1299 GENERAL SUPPLIES AR1299 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AR1299 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AR1299 NEW EQUIPMENT AR1299 DATA PROCESSING AR1299 JD Edwards Implement 030600 MN POST Licence- Shel 030300 PERA Shortage 3823 FINANCE DATA PROCESSIN ASSESSING DATA PROCESSIN GENERAL(BILLIN DATA PROCESSIN. COMMUNICATIONS DATA PROCESSIN CENT SVC GENER DATA PROCESSIN CENT SVC GENER PROF SERVICES FINANCE DATA PROCESSIN ASSESSING DATA PROCESSIN GENERAL(BILLIN DATA PROCESSIN INSPECTIONS DATA PROCESSIN COMMUNICATIONS DATA PROCESSIN POLICE DEPT. G DATA PROCESSIN CENT SVC GENER DATA PROCESSIN CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI ENGINEERING GE PROF SERVICES CENT SVC GENER PROF SERVICES CENT SVC GENER NEW EQUIP FIRE DEPARTMEN DATA PROCESSIN WORK. CAP. PRO DATA PROCESSIN POLICE DEPT. G LIC & PERMITS GENERAL FD PRO P.E.R.A. PAYAB Contribution to PERA 030300 GENERAL FD PRO P.E.R.A.'PAYAB COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 29 -MAR -2000 (14:51) page 2 CHECK NO CHECK DT CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <*> $19.62* 208527 03/06/00 $64,338.35 PERA TRADE DISCOUNT < *> WI $64,338.35* VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 208528 03/06/00 $69.44 PILGRIM CLEANERS < *> WI $69.44* 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 208529 03/06/00 $2,969.89 POSTMASTER < *> COST OF GOODS SOLD $2,969.89* 810462 -0 50TH ST SELLIN 208530 03/06/00 $2,642.00 POSTMASTER < *> TRADE DISCOUNT $2,642.00* LI 810496 -0 208532 03/06/00 $2,206.01 QUALITY WINE YORK SELLING 03/06/00 - $21.82 QUALITY WINE VERNON SELLING 03/06/00 $3,032.14 QUALITY WINE VERNON SELLING 03/06/00 - $30.05 QUALITY WINE VERNON SELLING 03/06/00 $1,083.01 QUALITY WINE VERNON SELLING 03/06/00 - $10.73 QUALITY WINE 03/06/00 $2,224.08 QUALITY WINE 02/17/00 03/06/00 - $44.18 QUALITY WINE 03/06/00 $3,471.66 QUALITY WINE 03/06/00 - $68.97 QUALITY WINE $32,678.22 03/06/00 $3,433.67 QUALITY WINE LIGHT 03/06/00 - $68.26 QUALITY WINE NSP 03/06/00 $337.32 QUALITY WINE & POWER 03/06/00 -$3.33 QUALITY WINE < *> 03 -22 -00 $15,540.55* LIGHT & POWER Contribution to PERA 03/03/00 GENERAL FD PRO P.E.R.A. PAYAB Cleaning Ice Rink Jac 030200 SKATING & HOCK GENERAL SUPPLI Postage for Spring Ab 022800 COMMUNICATIONS MAG /NEWSLET EX Citywide Hydrant Flus 030100 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLI 4659 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 810159 -0 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 03/06/00 810159 -0 YORK SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 810175 -0 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS US WEST COMMUNICATIONS 810175 -0 VERNON SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 810176 -0 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 022500 810176 -0 50TH ST SELLIN TRADE DISCOUNT COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 810462 -0 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU TRADE DISCOUNTS TELEPHONE 810462 -0 50TH ST SELLIN TRADE DISCOUNT COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 810496 -0 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU TRADE DISCOUNTS < *> 810496 -0 YORK SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 810528 -0 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU TRADE DISCOUNTS 03/13/00 810528 -0 VERNON SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 810833 -0 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS $500.00 810833 -0 VERNON SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT 208533 03/06/00 $545.80 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 022500 YORK FIRE STAT TELEPHONE 03/06/00 $54.58 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 022500 PUMP & LIFT ST TELEPHONE 03/06/00 $54.22 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 022500 DARE TELEPHONE 03/06/00 $2,565.59 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 022500 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE 03/06/00 $340.03 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 022500 ARENA BLDG /GRO TELEPHONE < *> $3,560.22* 208534 03/13/00 $500.00 EDINA CHAMBER OF COMMER GALA 2000 02/17/00 50TH ST SELLIN ADVERT OTHER 03/13/00 $500.00 EDINA CHAMBER OF COMMER ADVERTISING OTHER 02/17/00 YORK SELLING ADVERT OTHER 03/13/00 $500.00 EDINA CHAMBER OF COMMER ADVERTISING OTHER 02/17/00 VERNON SELLING ADVERT OTHER < *> $1,500.00* 208537 03/13/00 $32,678.22 NSP LIGHT & POWER 03 -22 -00 ST LIGHTING RE LIGHT & POWER 03/13/00 $32.51 NSP LIGHT & POWER 03 -22 -00 ST LIGHTING OR LIGHT & POWER 03/13/00 $4,390.43 NSP LIGHT & POWER 03 -22 -00 TRAFFIC SIGNAL LIGHT & POWER 03/13/00 $3,353.97 NSP LIGHT & POWER 03 -22 -00 PARKING RAMP LIGHT & POWER 03/13/00 $649.35 NSP LIGHT & POWER 03 -22 -00 FIRE DEPT. GEN LIGHT & POWER 03/13/00 $109.15 NSP LIGHT & POWER 03 -22 -00 YORK FIRE STAT LIGHT & POWER 03/13/00 $52.76 NSP LIGHT & POWER 03 -22 -00 CIVIL DEFENSE LIGHT & POWER 03/13/00 $1,846.44 NSP LIGHT & POWER 03 -22 -00 CITY HALL GENE LIGHT & POWER 03/13/00 $3,541.21 NSP LIGHT & POWER 03 -22 -00 PW BUILDING LIGHT & POWER 03/13/00 $6,703.92 NSP LIGHT & POWER 03 -22 -00 BUILDING MAINT LIGHT & POWER 03/13/00 $3,119.33 NSP LIGHT & POWER '03 -22 -00 CLUB HOUSE LIGHT & POWER 03/13/00 $223.42 NSP LIGHT & POWER 03 -22 -00 MAINT OF.COURS LIGHT & POWER 03/13/00 $207.00 NSP LIGHT & POWER 03- 22- -00 FRED RICHARDS LIGHT & POWER i - - COUNCIL CHEL__ REGISTER 29 -MAR -2000 t 31) page 3 CHECK NO CHECK DT CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 208537 03/13/00 $1,128.12 NSP LIGHT & POWER 03 -22 -00 GOLF DOME LIGHT & POWER 03/13/00 $378.66 NSP LIGHT & POWER 03 -22 -00 POOL OPERATION LIGHT & POWER 03/13/00 $6,137.62 NSP LIGHT & POWER 03 -22 -00 ARENA BLDG /GRO LIGHT & POWER 03/13/00 $849.09 NSP LIGHT & POWER 03 -22 -00 ART CENTER BLD LIGHT & POWER 03/13/00 $6,985.54 NSP LIGHT & POWER 03 -22 -00 POOL TRACK GRE LIGHT & POWER 03/13/00 $2,687.37 NSP LIGHT & POWER 03 -22 -00 CENTENNIAL LAK LIGHT & POWER 03/13/00 $2,513.44 NSP LIGHT & POWER 03 -22 -00 PUMP & LIFT ST LIGHT & POWER 03/13/00 $13,974.48 NSP LIGHT & POWER 03 -22 -00 DISTRIBUTION . LIGHT & POWER 03/13/00 $55.00 NSP LIGHT & POWER 03 -22 -00 TANKS TOWERS & LIGHT & POWER 03/13/00 $693.86 NSP LIGHT & POWER 03 -22 -00 50TH ST OCCUPA LIGHT & POWER 03/13/00 $1,190.82 NSP, LIGHT & POWER 03 -22 -00 YORK OCCUPANCY LIGHT & POWER 03/13/00 $581.57 NSP LIGHT & POWER 03 -22 -00 VERNON OCCUPAN LIGHT & POWER 03/13/00 $126.13 NSP LIGHT & POWER 03 -22 -00 GENERAL STORM LIGHT. & POWER 03/13/00 $174.35 NSP LIGHT & POWER 03 -22 -00 PONDS & LAKES LIGHT & POWER < *> $94,383.76* 208538 03/13/00 $15.75 OfficeMax Credit Plan OFFICE SUPPLIES 9564 COMMUNICATIONS COMMODITIES < *> $15.75* 208539 03/13/00 $404.10 Paging Network of Minne PAGER RENTAL 00093844 FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP RENTAL < *> $404.10* 208540 03/13/00 $285.00 POSTMASTER POSTAGE- NEWSLETTER 03 -09 -00 CENT SVC GENER POSTAGE < *> $285.00* 208542 03/13/00 - $284.32 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 774829 -0 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 03/13/00 - $292.86 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 807227 -0 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 03/13/00 $2,565.73 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 812677 -0 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 03/13/00 - $50.91 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 812677 -0 VERNON SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT 03/13/00 $2,179.27 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI .812728-0 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 03/13/00 - $21.56 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 812728 -0 50TH ST SELLIN TRADE DISCOUNT 03/13/00 $4,886.78 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 812733 -0 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 03/13/00 - $48.20 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 812733 -0 YORK SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT 03/13/00 $3,045.39 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 812744 -0 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 03/13/00 - $30.16 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 812744 -0 VERNON SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT 03/13/00 $3,956.70 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 812966 -0 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 03/13/00 - $78.57 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 812966 -0 YORK SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT 03/13/00 $1,014.01 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 812968 -0 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 03/13/00 - $20.13 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 812968 -0 50TH ST SELLIN TRADE DISCOUNT 03/13/00 $688.70 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 813521 -0 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 03/13/00 - $13.57 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 813521 -0 YORK SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT 03/13/00 $387.46 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 813522 -0 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 03/13/00 -$7.65 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 813522 -0 50TH ST SELLIN TRADE DISCOUNT 03/13/00 $166.26 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 814026 -0 YORK SELLING _CST OF GD WINE 03/13/00 -$1.66 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 814026 -0 YORK SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT < *> $18,040.71* 208543 03/13/00 $33.02 ROBERT B. HILL SALT 00094725 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $33.02* 208544 03/13/00 $182.36 U S BANCORP MEETING EXPENSES 03/05/00 CITY COUNCIL. MEETING EXPENS < *> $182.36* 208545 03/13/00 $1,842.73 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 03/01/00 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE 03/13/00 $255.96 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE" 03/01/00 PUMP & LIFT ST TELEPHONE COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 29 -MAR -2000 (14:51) page 4 CHECK NO CHECK DT CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 208545 03/13/00 $28.09 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 03/01/00 SKATING & HOCK TELEPHONE 03/13/00 $85.20 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 03/01/00 BUILDING MAINT TELEPHONE. 03/13/00 $805.46 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 03/01/00 YORK FIRE STAT TELEPHONE 03/13/00 $784.37 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 03/01/00 GENERAL STORM TELEPHONE < *> $3,801.81* 208950 03/20/00 $60.00 GRAUSAM, STEVE EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION 031700 LIQUOR YORK GE GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $60.00* 208951 03/20/00 $695.98 HARMON AUTOGLASS WINDSHIELD, ADHESIVE 0014 -000 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 5279 < *> $695.98* 208952 03/20/00 $200,000.00 HRA /CITY OF EDINA FUND HRA 032000 GENERAL FD PRO DUE FROM HRA < *> $200,000.00* 208953 03/20/00 $23.00 MPCA WASTEWATER LICENSE RE 031500 TRAINING LIC & PERMITS < *> $23.00* 208954 03/20/00 $23.00 MPCA WASTEWATER LICENSE RE 03/15 TRAINING LIC & PERMITS < *> $23.00* 208955 03/20/00 $19.62 PERA P.E.R.A. PAYABLE 032000 GENERAL FD PRO P.E.R.A. PAYAB < *> $19.62* 208956 03/20/00 $60,988.40 PERA P.E.R.A. PAYABLE 03/20 GENERAL FD PRO P.E.R.A. PAYAB . < *> $60,988.40* 208958 03/20/00 $418.80 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 810100 -0 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 03/20/00 -$4.14 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 810100 -0 YORK SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT 03/20/00 $2,911.31 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 814911 -0 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 03/20/00 - $28.82 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 814911 -0 VERNON SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT 03/20/00 $1,694.99 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 814912 -0 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 03/20/00 - $33.61 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 814912 -0 VERNON SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT 03/20/00 $2,704.50 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 814968 -0 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 03/20/00 - $26.83 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 814968 -0 50TH ST SELLIN TRADE DISCOUNT 03/20/00 $4,173.33 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 815049 -0 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 03/20/00 - $41.30 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 815049 -0 YORK SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT 03/20/00 $129.37 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 815100 -0 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 03/20/00 -$2.57 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 815100 -0 VERNON SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT 03/20/00 $646.48 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 815110 -0 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 03/20/00 - $12.83 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 815110 -0 50TH ST SELLIN TRADE DISCOUNT 03/20/00 $3,362.40 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 815212 -0 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 03/20/00 - $66.67 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 815212 -0 YORK SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT 03/20/00 $191.00 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 815343 -0 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 03/20/00 -$1.91 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 815343 -0 50TH ST SELLIN TRADE DISCOUNT < *> $16,013.50* 208959 03/20/00 - $198:41 TILE SHOP, THE CREDIT RETURN C0000457 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 5344 03/20/00 $520.29 TILE SHOP, THE - TILE, SAND GROUT MIX 00004846 PW BUILDING ' REPAIR PARTS 5451 03/20/00 - $110.60 TILE SHOP, THE RETURNS 00005070 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 5451 < *> $211.28* 208960 03/20/00 $55.73 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 030700 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE 03/20/00 $46.00 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 031000 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE 03/20/00 $57.32 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE '3 -10 BUILDING MAINT TELEPHONE M COUNCIL CHE%_ REGISTER 29 -MAR -2000 (_ .51) page 5 CHECK NO CHECK DT CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 208960 03/20/00 $36.08 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 3/10 SKATING & HOCK TELEPHONE. < *> $195.13* 208962 03/27/00 $120.91 Airtouch Cellular Belle TELEPHONE 03/10/00 INSPECTIONS TELEPHONE 03/27/00 $5.67 Airtouch Cellular Belle TELEPHONE 03/10/00 PUBLIC HEALTH TELEPHONE 03/27/00 $161.97 Airtouch Cellular Belle TELEPHONE 03/10/00 FIRE DEPT. GEN TELEPHONE 03/27/00 $196.17 Airtouch Cellular Belle TELEPHONE 03/10/00 ADMINISTRATION TELEPHONE 03/27/00 $12.51 Airtouch Cellular Belle TELEPHONE 03/10/00 COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 03/27/00 $73.39 Airtouch Cellular Belle TELEPHONE 03/10/00 PARK ADMIN. TELEPHONE 03/27/00 $108.40 Airtouch Cellular Belle TELEPHONE 03/10/00 PARK MAINTENAN TELEPHONE 03/27/00 $7.81 Airtouch Cellular Belle TELEPHONE 03/10/00 TREES & MAINTE TELEPHONE 03/27/00 $5.92 Airtouch Cellular Belle TELEPHONE 03/10/00 CLUB HOUSE TELEPHONE 03/27/00 $289.32 Airtouch Cellular Belle TELEPHONE 03/10/00 DISTRIBUTION TELEPHONE 03/27/00 $66.29 Airtouch Cellular Belle TELEPHONE 03/10/00 ENGINEERING GE TELEPHONE 03/27/00 $192.48 Airtouch Cellular Belle TELEPHONE 03/10/00 SUPERV. & OVRH TELEPHONE 03/27/00 $361.32 Airtouch Cellular Belle TELEPHONE 03/23/00 PATROL TELEPHONE 03/27/00 $290.28 Airtouch Cellular Belle TELEPHONE 03/23/00 INVESTIGATION TELEPHONE 03/27/00 $35.44 Airtouch Cellular Belle GENERAL SUPPLIES 03/23/00 ANIMAL CONTROL TELEPHONE < *> $1,927.88* 208963 03/27/00 $12.84 AT &T TELEPHONE 03 -03 -00 DISTRIBUTION TELEPHONE 03/27/00 $12.84 AT &T TELEPHONE 03/03/00 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE 03/27/00 $12.84 AT &T TELEPHONE 030300 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE < *> $38.52* 208964 03/27/00 $1,365.70 Clean -Flo International PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 8484 2000 AQUATIC W PROF SERVICES 03/27/00 $1,580.70 Clean -Flo International PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 8485 2000 AQUATIC W PROF SERVICES < *> $2,946.40* 208965 03/27/00 $5,777.40 DELTA DENTAL PREM 04/00 03/22/00 CENT SVC GENER HOSPITALIZATIO < *> $5,777.40* 208966 03/27/00 $334.58 Global Crossing Telecom TELEPHONE 03/14/00 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE < *> $334.58* 208967 03/27/00 $22,677.26 MEDICA 04/00 ELECT 10009212 CENT SVC GENER HOSPITALIZATIO < *> $22,677.26* 208968 03/27/00 $4,018.76 MEDICA 04/00 LOW OPTION 10009212 CENT SVC GENER HOSPITALIZATIO < *> $4,018.76* 208969 03/27/00 $225,056.00 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL EN SEWER SERVICE 00007003 SEWER TREATMEN SEWER SVC METR < *> $225,056.00* 208970 03/27/00 $52.25 PARK NICOLLET CLINIC HEP B SHOTS 01/22/00 FIRE DEPT. GEN PROF SERVICES < *> $52.25* 208972 03/27/00 - $140.59 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 817032 -0 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 03/27/00 - $74.35 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 817033 -0 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 03/27/00 $1,055.25 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 817106 -0 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 03/27/00 - $10.42 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 817106 -0 50TH ST SELLIN TRADE DISCOUNT 03/27/00 $2,121.61 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 817150 -0 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 03/27/00 - $20.95 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 817150 -0 YORK SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT 03/27/00 $2,547.21 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 817191 -0 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 03/27/00 - $25.22 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 817191 -0 VERNON SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 29 -MAR -2000 (14:51) page 6 CHECK NO CHECK DT CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 208972 03/27/00 $3,492.56 QUALITY WINE LAUNDRY 817289 -0 VERNON SELLING LAUNDRY 03/27/00 - $69.39 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 817289 -0 VERNON SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT 03/27/00 $1,586.18 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 817290 -0 50TH ST- SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 03/27/00 - $31.52 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 817290 -0 50TH ST.SELLIN TRADE DISCOUNT 03/27/00 $4,573.33 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 817302 -0 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 03/27/00 - $90.68 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 817302 =0 YORK SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT 03/27/00 $220.50 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 817575 -0 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 03/27/00 -$2.20 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 1817575 -0 G YORK SELLINTRADE DISCOUNT 03/27/00 - $138.85 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 817652 -0 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE <*> $14,992.47* 208973 03/27/00 $225.41 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 03/13/00 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE 03/27/00 $72.15 " US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 03 -16 -00 VANVALKENBURG TELEPHONE 03/27/00 $54.22 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 03/16/00 BUILDING MAINT TELEPHONE 03/27/00 $82.48 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 03/16/20 YORK FIRE STAT TELEPHONE <*> $434.26* 208974 03/27/00 $939.96 Welsh Companies Inc APRIL RENT 03/27/00 YORK OCCUPANCY PROF SERVICES < *> $939.96* $844,882.40* i COUNCIL CHEF_- SUMMARY FOR HAND CHECKS 29 -MAR -2000 t_ .54) page 1 ----------------------------------------- FUND # 10 GENERAL FUND $452,848.38 FUND # 12 COMMUNICATIONS $3,746.81 FUND #'.15 WORKING CAPITAL $41,141.20 FUND # 23 ART CENTER $849.09 FUND # 25 GOLF DOME FUND $1,128.12 FUND # 26 SWIMMING POOL FUND $378.66 FUND # 27 GOLF COURSE FUND $3,653.13 FUND # 28 ICE ARENA FUND $6,477.65 FUND # 30 EDINBOROUGH /CENTENNIAL LAK $9,704.03 FUND # 40 UTILITY FUND $254,317.04 FUND # 41 STORM SEWER UTILITY FUND $1,084.85 FUND # 50 LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND $69,553.44 $844,882.40* March 29, 2000 City of Edina Dennis Maetzold, Mayor 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 Dear Mayor, I am writing to you concerning the proposal by the Minneapolis Park Board for a dog recreation area. They want to put this facility on my block between 400' and 41" streets on France Avenue. I went to a public meeting to voice my opposition to their plan for our city. First in my list of objections is their assumption that Edina residents and neighborhoods don't matter. This proposal will bring traffic onto an already congested France Avenue. It will bring large numbers of people and their dogs to congregate in my neighborhood. Why don't they put it in their own city? Minneapolis Park Police, Minneapolis Police, and Minneapolis Animal Control have no jurisdiction in Edina. They won't control nuisance individuals or their dogs. This duty will fall upon our Edina Police. My neighbors and children will suffer. This facility will bring more dog leash violators, more terrified children, more calls to Edina Police, more traffic, and less peace around here. Secondly, they stated at their public meeting that there will be no provision for parking off -street for this public facility. They intend to service southwest Minneapolis but plan no parking lot. Their explicit plan was to have cars use the Weber Field lot and park on France Avenue. I don't want swarms of dogs released from cars parked in front of my house! France Avenue is already congested, with limited parking, with high accident rates, and with too many speeders. When I use Weber Field I don't want to be shut out of the lot there by dog exercisers. That lot is for Edina park users. I think that many other objections to their proposal are valid. Where will these visitors relieve themselves? Who will protect my children from those who release dogs in the Weber Park lot or on my block before they get to the gates of their facility? How much noise will these groups make and until how late every night? Who will suffer from the barking, hubbub, and shouting that will go on there? Please help influence the Minneapolis Park Board to choose a responsible site in their own city. Thanks, Ethan Rogers 4108 France Ave. So. Edina, MN 55416 325 -3016 925 -3123 Pd-� 1, 1 r I , OAL O, 1"�fj frV IYU A-t, W -ji/ March 30, 2000 City Council Edina, Minnesota Dear Council Member, I am writing to express my support for the Off -Leash Dog Park that the City of Minneapolis is proposing to develop on the land around 4& and France. Apparently this land, while owned by the City of Minneapolis, is in the City of Edina. I am presuming that any such plans must be approved by the City of Edina, and I am writing, as a long time resident of Edina, to tell you that I would support such a plan. In fact, I feel that their proposed plan of 2 acres is not big enough and that the entire area (approximately 10 acres) should be enclosed as an Off -Leash Dog Park. The Minneapolis Park Board does not have enough money to fence in the entire area, but I would like to see the City of Edina (and the City of Saint Louis Park) contribute, since residents of all three cities would benefit from this area. And I would certainly expect that the City of Edina would get a share of the permit fees. It is my understanding, based on studies of such parks in other urban areas, that properly implemented Off -Leash Dog Parks are very good for the neighborhoods. They encourage socialization of both dogs and people. People get to know their neighbors through their dogs. And since the entire area would be fenced in, that should reduce the traffic of unleashed dogs outside the area. I would like to see an Off -Leash Dog Park constructed on this site and such an endeavor has my full support. Sincerely, Dr. Robert R. Clinton 6712 Rosemary Lane Edina, MN 55439 -1148 cc: Dennis Maetzold, Nan Faust, James Hovland, Scott Johnson, Michael Kelly March 30, 2000 Mayor Dennis Maetzold & Edina Council Members Edina City Hall Edina, MN I am writing to ask you to SUPPORT THE PROPOSED OFF -LEASH DOG PARK AT 41` AND FRANCE AVE. I attended the community meeting at Linden Hills Park and was told that the city of Minneapolis wanted to fence 2 acres of woods adjacent to Weber Field in Edina. While there still remain some problems to work out, having a DOG PARK on this site seems to be the best use for the land: 1) The site in question is currently wooded and does not appear very safe since it looks so wild and not many people go through the area. My husband and I lived in the Morningside neighborhood for 3 years and while we walked to Weber Field, we never once thought it would be SAFE to walk those wooded paths. I understand that there are paths through the trees and that some people go there to do illegal activities, e.g. kids drinking and having sex, people letting their dogs run wild. CURRENTLY THE LAND IS NOT BEING USED FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE COMMUNITY AND IN FACT IS A LIABILITY TO THE CITY OF EDINA. 2) A Dog Park would increase the foot traffic in the area which would DISCOURAGE CRIMINAL ACTIVITY. 3) A Dog Park would have a small impact on the environment, and would leave the basic character of the woods unchanged, which would propitiate the tree - hugger faction. 4) My understanding is that the DOG PARK USERS WOULD POLICE THE DOG PARK to ensure the area is picked up and that the leash laws are obeyed outside the fenced area. USERS WOULD SELF - POLICE SINCE THEY UNDERSTAND THAT NON- COMPLIANCE WOULD RESULT IN CLOSING THE DOG PARK. 5) Finally, I would encourage the City of Edina to get involved in running this park since we Edinans have a chance to GAIN REVENUE FROM PARK LICENSES, DOG LICENSES, AND CITATIONS. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sinc rely, v ' Karen Clinton 6712 Rosemary Lane Edina, MN 55439 March 21, 2000 Mayor Dennis Maetzold City of Edina Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Proposed Community Center Project Dear Mayor Maetzold, Our two children (Grace, second grade; and Jack, fifth grade) attend the Normandale Elementary School and we are very pleased with the unique and high quality education they receive. The only drawback to their educational experience has been the physical facility. Normandale's setting in the Community Center building clearly involves some physical space issues not faced by the other Edina elementary schools: (1) decreased security due to building uses by. multiple populations; (2) lack of adequate playground and outdoor playing field space; and (3) inconvenient and less -than -safe parking. The proposed Community Center project could only exacerbate each of these existing concerns: (1) school security would be further degraded by additional, non - school populations present at and near the school for extended hours; (2) the existing outdoor playing field space would be significantly decreased by the construction of the gyms and additional parking; and (3) the distance from parking spaces to the school would be even greater than for current conditions. The proposed project is acknowledged to offer no benefit to Normandale students. Accordingly, we believe it is very important that the City Council require a detailed and public comparative evaluation of all possible sites before seriously considering further burdening the Normandale school facility with this project. We are opposed to the planned approach and would be pleased to discuss the project with you if it would be helpful. Sincerely, Michael M. Relf Carol W. Relf 4229 Alden Drive, Edina, MN 55416; phone (952) 929 -6360; e-mail mmrelf@aol.com f� • March 30, 2000 Members of the City Council Gordon Hughes, City Manager Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th Street Edina MN 55425 Dear Members of the Council: We are Edina residents who oppose the proposed Community Center Project. We are extremely concerned about the parking, traffic, and safety issues that arise from the proposed project. We implore you to continue to listen to and seriously consider how the proposed project will affect all members of our. community, not just selected interest groups (even if they have very deep pockets). As residents of W. 59`" Street, our home is immediately south of and overlooks the current McCarthy Field and practice football field. Contrary to all architectural plans we have seen thus far, our street ends in a cul de sac with no vehicle access to or from the Normandale frontage road. It is a quiet and safe neighborhood for our two children and our neighbors' children, save for the five or, six nights per year that the football Hornets have home games. We and our neighbors can live with the current inconvenience of the football game crowds because, after all, it is only six nights out of 365. But, we shudder to think of dealing, on a regular basis, with the crowds, the traffic jams, and the congested parking that the planned heavy evening and weekend use of the fieldhouse gyms will surely bring. The minimal number of additional parking spaces that the proposed plan provides does not come close to meeting the increased needs for parking that the expanded facility use will bring. Our neighborhood and the neighborhoods on the north and east sides of the campus will have to absorb the traffic, parking, and crowd woes. This is not good for our neighborhood, and it is not good for Edina. As it is, the proposed parking lot expansion onto McCarthy Field presents several problems. The displacement of the baseball field (or soccer field if the baseball field is relocated to the east) in favor of a gym presents a scenario of "robbing Peter to pay Paul " — satisfying basketball boosters at the expense of baseball /soccer boosters. The current casual use of the fields for friendly ball games, kite - flying, model rocket launching, and golf swing practicing by many area residents will come to an end. Further, all of the lighting, noise, and security risks that accompany a parking lot will be practically in our (and our neighbors') front yard! We are extremely concerned about the detrimental effect'the proposed project will have on the'property values and quality of life for those of use who live in the neighborhoods t surrounding the Community Center. We urge you to seriously consider viable alternatives for any necessary expansion of academic and athletic facilities. Very truly yours, David and Beth Iacono 4813 W-5 9th Street Edina MN 55424 612/929 -4487 March 24, 2000 Colleen Feige Edina Board of Education 6616 Field Way Edina, 55436 Re: Follow -Up on Community Center Issues Dear Ms. Feige, Thank you so much for taking the time to call to discuss the proposed Community Center project. I appreciate your interest and wanted to follow up on several points we addressed in our conversation. Comparative Analysis of Sites -- From our conversation, I understand that you also have had difficulty in locating any documented rationale for how the proposed site was selected. Since you are someone closely involved in the formal decision - making process, it seems as though this information should have been provided to you up -front. In our position as parents trying to get more involved in the decision - making process, we will have even less direct access to such information. This is very reminiscent of the WMEP siting process, where (1) no written criteria were ever set forth to define the desired or necessary characteristics for a site, and (2) significant funds were expended in planning for what was ultimately shown to be a clearly unacceptable location (Weber Park), all without any preceding analysis of potentially viable sites. I hope you can understand the frustration that my wife and I feel in seeing what appears to be a replay of this same unproductive approach - an approach that seems to polarize reactions and is wasteful of City resources. Input from Normandale Parents -- You indicated that your notes suggested that the decision to site the proposed facility was likely made last fall. Whether or not this is the case, it is clear that Normandale families most affected by the decision were not asked for input at the time the site was selected. It now feels to us as though our input is only being requested after the fact, and only with regard to how to mitigate inevitable negative impacts to an already less -than-ideal physical facility. On this basis, it seems that an organizational "lobbying" effort by affected families is an appropriate way to attempt to have more meaningful input to the process. Again, our experience with the WMEP school siting process indicates that an intensive lobbying effort by the neighborhood was, in fact, required in order to deter the expenditure of further City funds in pursuit of what everyone ultimately agreed was a clearly inappropriate site. March 24, 2000 Page Two Broader Community Benefits — In our conversation, you suggested that while Normandale parents may not believe that our children will directly benefit from the proposed facility, perhaps the children could recognize and support the facility's broader benefit to the community. Although both of our children have enjoyed playing basketball in City leagues, I cannot view additional gym space as an essential element for the community good. My wife and I believe that the current emphasis on sports in Edina is either sufficient or perhaps excessive. While we would be pleased to consider involving our children in support of efforts to address more substantive community issues (maintaining/enhancing green space, promoting volunteerism by youth, creating affordable housing, etc.), we are hesitant to suggest to our kids that "additional gym space" is a critical community issue that warrants 600 elementary school children dealing with further negative implications for their educational facility. Thanks again for taking the time to call and discuss the proposed Community Center. We look forward to staying involved in the process as things progress: Sincerely, Michael M. Relf 4229 Alden Drive Edina, MN 55416 (952) 929 -6360 mmrelf @aol.com cc: Edina Board of Education Edina City Council Elizabeth and Michael Balay 4625 Bruce Avenue Edina, MN 55424 952- 926 -0287 Mr. Gordon Hughes City Manager Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 March 22, 2000 Dear Mr. Hughes: I am writing to express my concerns about the proposed athletic complex at the Edina Community Center. As a city resident, I can understand the need for expanded athletic facilities for the benefit of our community. But as a Normandale parent, I must urge the City to consider another site for the proposed facility. The issues of security, traffic, and parking are of paramount concern to the Normandale community. The school's security arrangements are already porous, due to its.sharing of space with the Community Center. The influx of cars and buses using a new athletic facility would complicate an already tricky, tangled traffic pattern. And dedicating the South lot, currently in use by Normandale, to the new facility and removing school parking even farther is simply not fair. It's already a long, cold walk from the South lot to the school's main entrance (other doors are not available because of security arrangements between the school and the Community Center.) I believe that an impact study of the proposed project would certainly confirm these legitimate concerns. And since the new facility bears no benefit for the school, I urge that the City consider another location for the project. To turn a blind eye to the needs of our school community sends an unfortunate message - that adults' recreational needs are more important than the safety and education of our children. Sincerely, Eli. eth Balay cc: Terry Factor, Normandale Elementary Editor, Sun Current Newspaper 4531 Casco Ave. Edina, MN 55424 March 22, 2000 Members of the City Council Gordon Hughes, City Manager Edina City Hall 4801 W. 5& St. Edina, MN 55424 Dear Members of City Council, As Normandale parents, we are strongly opposed to the proposed expansion plan at the Community Center. Our biggest concern is the security issues it presents to our school. We are already faced with a less than optimal environment. A three gym complex will only further strain our school's limited security. Part of the proposal is to enhance the auditorium. This will only increase security problems we already face with middle school students entering our school before our children have left for the day. We just learned our second - graders are sharing their bathroom with these unsupervised middle- school children. I'm sure you would agree this is highly undesirable and asking for trouble. Our school was told these students would not use the auditorium until after Normandale hours. This is all too much like the promise being made to us about the after -hours use of the gyms by the public. Normandale is already faced with parking problems. The new facility would make the parking next to impossible. Normandale is one of the largest elementary schools in the district in terms of enrollment. Yet we continue to have one of the least desirable facilities. Let's stop ignoring the fact that Normandale is a full- fledged school, and not just a mini program in the Community Center. We urge that further investigation be made as to other possible sites for the gymnasiums. Sites which have far more land, parking options, and accessibility such as Braemar would be more logical. It would also be an excellent start to the "Community Recreation Center" that Edina really is in need of Sincerely, 7 Jz 7 Carla and John Temple c.c. Terry Factor - Edina Family Center U 5701 Normandale Road Edina, Minnesota 55424 -1530 \ (612) 928 -2642 M ++ FAX (612) 928 -2601 Early Childhood Family Education ❖ Licensed Nursery School •3 Licensed Child Care ❖ Learning Readiness March 7, 2000 Edina Sun - Current fax 806 -0133 To the editor: The Edina Family Center Advisory Council stands in favor of the proposed expansion of city athletic facilities that would take place primarily at our home, the Edina Community Center. We reviewed the plans atiour March 7 meeting, and after some discussion passed a motion of support. While we realize that the proposal is a work -in- progress, we believe it will benefit our children both now and.(especially) in the future, with only minimal inconvenience. Safety is clearly paramount�for'all concerned. We look forward to so hearing more about this necessary, family - friendly project as it moves forward. Y� Cilatelle Leach Chair, Edina Family Center Advisory Council (4204 Oakdale Avenue South Edina, MN 55416 952- 925 -1232 crleach @aol.com) cc: Nancy Delin EFC Advisory Council City Council School Board City Management CES Board Edina Public Schools Administration The Edina Family Center is a Community Education Service of the Edina Public Schools. March 29, 2000 Dear Edina City Council: The joint plan of the city and the school district to update city recreational and school facilities presents positive and exciting opportunities for our schools and for our community. As a parent of students at both Concord and South View, I am pleased about the improved educational environments that those facilities would create for the children using those buildings. Due to inadequate space, Concord is unable to serve its large, still - growing population in the most optimal way. Every square foot of the school is being used fully and creatively, yet Concord remains two classrooms short, the primary students must use the cafeteria for physical education, and insufficient space is available for a variety of special programs and services needed by Concord's students. As a community member, I am pleased that, after school hours, improved and expanded facilities would be available for use by school and community athletic organizations and the many other groups, such as Boy Scouts, Girl Scouts, and other community organizations, that make use of Edina's gymnasiums and athletic fields. During school hours, Community Center occupants such as Normandale Elementary, the Edina Family Center, KIDS Club, and WISE Guys would be able to use the new facilities proposed for the Community Center. Concerns about safety and parking have been raised about the part of the plan that affects the Community Center. My children have attended various Edina .Family Center and Kinderplay classes at the Community Center throughout the past 12 years, so I understand those concerns. It appears that the safety of the many children using the Community Center has been recognized as a high priority by everyone involved in the process. It seems reasonable to expect that safety and security issues will be identified and addressed thoroughly as the proposed plan is finalized and implemented. Parking has always been somewhat difficult at the Community Center site. The expanded and reconfigured parking contemplated by the plan is designed to help prevent parking from becoming a larger problem, at least during school hours, as a result of the proposed new field house. Our schools and our community will benefit from this joint project, and I hope that you will support it at your April 4 meeting. Very truly yours, Ly a Stanley 4107 West 48t' Street Edina, MN 55424 -1218 952 - 926 -6302 Virginia and Orrin Broberg 5229 Minnehaha Blvd. Edina, MN 55424 612 - 925 -5613 Members of City Council Gordon Hughes, City Manager Edina City Hall 4901 W. 5& Street Edina, MN 55424 Attn: Deb Manaen, City Clerk Dear Members of City Council: We are parents of 2 children currently attending Norrnandale Elementary School. We also utilized the building for both Summer Shades and Adult Education as well as Brownies and Girt Scouts. We are writing this letter to bring to your attention that the proposed development of an athletic facility as currently described is a very poorly conceived idea. We find this to be an inappropriate use of the community center for the following reasons: 1. Parking —The facility currently hosts a number of pre-k, elementary up to adult programs (ECFC, Summer Shades, Kids Club/WISE Guys and Adult Education Classes). The proposed parking change only makes an already difficult parking situation, untenable. Parking and access to the building are already major concerns. It seems this decision is specifically ignoring the needs of those populations already using the building and that the results of this construction will discourage them from utilizing this facility in the future. The parking concern represents both an access problem as well as a security problem. 2. Security —We find it difficult to believe that the city is willing to place the second largest elementary school in Edina at more risk for security in order to add revenue to the city through the development of an athletic center. Perhaps you can help us understand your reasoning. The building already lacks security due to its multi -use function. How can this change do anything but increase the security risk to these children? 3. Outdoor Play Ground —We understand the proposed plan will eliminate an already very small green space for the elementary school to utilize. What could be the rationale behind this? The facility does not need more indoor play space. 4. Construction Time —Given the prolonged construction time for this project, how can it be justified when the children's days will be disturbed by noise, construction and additional bedlam with no benefit to them? We hope that you will now consider those who have the most to lose in this endeavor and have had, to date, no voice in these developments. We are now making it known that we would appreciate you considering other sites for the public use gymnasiums and the year -round athletic facility. Si cerely, Mrgi i and Orrin Broberg N, i Petition To: Edina City Council From: Richmond Hills Neighborhood Association Subject: Grandview Square Development We, the residents of the Richmond Hills neighborhood oppose ceding any portion of our existing neighborhood park, "Sherwood Park ", to the "Grandview Square" development. It is of vital importance to us that you remember, as we do, that the City Council stated that the park would be left intact , a commitment also made by the Ron Clark representative at the late -fall neighborhood presentation meeting! On March 27, 2000, OPUS/Ron Clark presented its site plan to the Neighborhood Association. It was a shock to observe that "Sherwood Park" was dramatically reduced in size by four -story condominiums! This is completely unacceptable. We all believed in good faith that the developer would honor the commitment made to preserving Sherwood Park, as indicated on the plan he created and presented to the Association and the City Council in late fall -- a plan he used to gain our approval and support. (See attached site plan and overview). A considerable number of Association neighbors pointed out at Council meetings and in letters to the Council the need for keeping the park intact. Those reasons included: 1.) The park is a Vital part of this neighborhood. - people buy homes here because of the park. - there is a growing number of children in the area, who need and use the park. - we hold neighborhood functions there. - our grandchildren enjoy it. 2.) The park acts as a "buffer" between our neighborhood and the higher - traffic, commercial area. - this need will be even greater with the increased congestion and traffic generated from the new development. - Sherwood Park was initially proposed by developers as offering a good "buffer" between the existing neighborhood and a new development, indicating to us acknowledged understanding of its importance. 3.) The proposed residential buildings taking over the park area are four stories high, totaling approximately 52 feet! If allowed to be developed as proposed, they would be an overwhelming presence to all nearby housing and tower over the entrance to our existing neighborhood. 4.) The park at our entrance meets a BASIC NEED. This is a unique land - locked area and we have no practical alternative for a park. We use and enjoy Sherwood Park. We have been told throughout this matter that both the developer and the City Council would respect the needs of the citizens who live in the area. It has always been Edina's practice to carefully consider these needs. Please don't let indifference or financial appeal outweigh them...." r Petition Signature Page .Name Phone Number Address City State /Province ZIP /Postal Code s . � l� 11� (O "(-4493 Sad°! �� wov �' �cllh� AA vi ss Y'3` Signature Name Phone Number Address city State /Province ZIP /Postal Code SaC ' ORWOO M. Signat Name Phone Number Address City State /Province ZIP /Postal Code C a��tistie Ul \oc�r` �2��G 3 P —��ooc Or C -�1�c� Mtn sS 3(� Signature Name Phone Number Address City State /Province . " ZIP /Postal Code Nton 9r. 6diOG M03 5543c0 Signature n n Name Phone Number Address'' City State /Province ZIP /Postal Code Signature n 7% �� o /� IG D ,OZ Q1M} %u /V N e Phone Number Address City State /Province ZIP /Postal Code Signature ��� �� �. ��� � 44- Petition Signature Page Name Phone Number.:. Address Cit State /Province ZIP /Postal Code 0(k 922 -6353 SigAature S1 ii P. „Qwc0d lrtk,l Name Phone Number Address' -'Clty State /Province ZIP /Postal Code J-tv►he �qr;e (�I�S q 2.2 -(� 39 3 Si n�t ' S 3�S �� - te�� ' 3 (o Name Phone Number Address City State /Province ZIP /Postal Code_. Nlk'chf.L(c Sf���-, �7a - l?�( S 3LR;c.hwrcd E' nG MN [. Signature ” Name Phone Number Address m City State /Province ZIP /Postal Code Signature Name Phone Number Address Cltx State /Province ZIP /Postal Code ga g -6,n � -!"Xq k, c Si natur Name Phone umber Address C State /Province ZIP /Postal Code K%.c "d Dr �,;illm /t-I L5s---If 6 Signature _ Y-I A Petition Signature Page Name Phone Number Address City State /Province ZIP /Postal Code �o of C-le-4-1-Y (P I a 6)2 7 �AA 17—kCi+P000 10DuW &VA 4 Signature krt /V Name Phone Number Address Ci State /Province ZIP /Postal Code At//-Y SU0f« G22 -o372 5yd8 F «���e�S� i�a M/v Ssy�,6 Signature 6ele 5ka q�� -03V 5X09 rclr�A s� 01;`,a N Name Phone Number Address' City State /Province ZIP/Postal Code / �cd J114 U � �3U ( P��f��4 (�— -Q i-✓.¢— i � s � 7�� Si ature ` Name Phone Number Address City State /Province ZIP /Postal Code Signatu NcAe Phone Number Address city, State /Province ZIP /Postal Code AID- -- 0214 Signa re Name Phone Number Address City State /Province , ZIP /Postal Code J�7 Signature Petition Signature Page Name Phone Number Address c Dal �-� Sig re State /Province ZIP Postal Code i LOW Name Phone Number Address': City State /Province ZIP /Postal Code 4-t 5a l� ��, �,v �( O hd Signature a 3 � zi- Name Phone Number Address CRY State /Province ZIP /Postal Code Signat�d -lp- Name Phone Number Address _ City State /Province ZIP /Postal Code ep�IA� Signature Name Phone Number Address City State /Province ZIP/Postal //Code � � �-3 / grS ure Name ­7K4e Nuroker Address City State /Province ZIP Postal Code A � Signature mw 4 h Petition Signature Page Name Phone Number Address City State /Province ZIP /Postal Code Name Phone Number Address City State /Province ZIP /Postal Code MR?lSi ature�'�V`��W fs cj_6z�9 kl&*VOCQ� De 2114JA Name% Phone Number Address City State /Province ZIP /Postal Code Signatu e � Na a Phone Num r Ad R s Cit State /Province ZIP /Postal Code Pew a e< Signature ( (r Name Phone Number Address City State /Province ZIP /Postal Code PArs.� �h,�u5h "essy Sig ature Name V Phone Number Address City State /Province ZIP /Postal Code nn �. bc,f`P_PY\ a sfmn Signature Petition Signature Page Na mlef ly =Phone Number Address City State /Province ZIP /Postal Code 1 �'7 C)WCVI [ 0 e Phone Number Address city State /Province ZIP Postal Code Sign; re Name Phone Number Aaaress %.Ily JIYIC /f lv.ul�w r.. /. v - -- Signature Name Phone Number Address City , State /Province I ZIP /Postal Code Signature Name Phone Number Address City State /Province ZIP /Postal Code Signature Name Phone Number Address City State /Province ZIP /Postal Code Signature 6 4aj I)qMe,,S f,,-c.ej'Vcd an Petition Signature Page NOM Phone Num b er-> Address CIN State/Pio ZIP /Postal Co e� s-e4 e x Signature Z-w Name Phone Number Addr es- c , st6te/pr64116 ­Zlp/postal code`-' - Po /I / &�4 Signature Name" Phone Number.,-1;:' Address State /Province; ZIP/Postal Code" M Doe Signature �% Z-7 Name l -Phone Numbev,Address City ZIP /Postal st Code Signatur6";�, Name /Postal Code:;. State 6/Provlh4�4. Phone Ntimber:�"I"Addriais"'z Signature 5-A57 mq Signature Province '."ZIP 777T. T'77, Petition Signature Page Name - Phone e Numberi' F 'Addresi" ZIP /Postal Code" 5UTOJ 1akhAV7 q,52� V4_ (Vaoicmcl- C-Ai tiek MIIU Signature 7Q05 ,4 Name Phone Numbei."`-'Addre s' c it State /PrOvInc ZIP/Post I Code':: "\2xv\r-1 Signature 5-&ALk State /Province:; ZIP/Postal Code'' Phone Numbe'.�,,,"�',,Address a ,�'., e -��.. -��' cis> -ate ���sa 1 CA k) 3r. Signature c t - W- ZIP/P6sf I'C(d e Signature Signature P fo"v nce:�, 'ZIP Postal Signature • . d -. — Petition Signature Page N ZIP /Postal tal Code'" .c) State /Province'; me:- P one' N u mbei:,.' Address,':'-�,,`,-.-, Ph In— Signature, q2- Name :Phone Number Addreis ' City; S dte /Pro416 cd ,%!;ZIP/Postal Code:'- � Szz4 6-v 7AM- Fl� Signature Name p 0 NL N umb6r--" "'Address City State /Province:; ZIP/Postal Cbde�, Miel'ielle, q� 633y i�14WOCA ;U/ IV 3 52/3 Signature f M(L (?Id Signa y�,,Z k4NOMI &, j,�c�ru, 110 -.'.:ZIP/Postal Cqde�-,' -�4-i'�-Sfat4/Prov c CI I h one ,. Number!,`. P Name 5; rl 0 / cev A17 6/ Signature,�/ Nome Phone' N um b ei Addr esv, c stofc Province . 'ZIP/Poitc[Cod6,i< 36 Signaturer P Petition Signature Page Name Ph one Number Address City{ ` State/Nov Pr? F- Signature Name 6 -',,,,-, Phone Num'bee,t!�Address .�,:"�- City: state /Prov ncE ZIP /Postal Code, .6"Rng j,?Ic#yjd%&D 4-d. i ;,,r 's Signature Stat6/Province�` ZIP/Postal Code" ci No-me w" Pt�u i m bee Signature Op 6s; f (W to 5-M,`3 CO N am Phone Nunber`..,'�'Add ress:' State /Province`: ZIP /Postal C de'- 6CI5 V-1thwood Op-. �,Cklnal AAIV 564 3( o Signature No me Phone Number :''.'Address ' :'State /Province; e /Pidv nce-. ZIP /Postal s to f Code XAA) (0 Signature can w Name 1, i Phone 6 N U m b e "Cl State /Province: ZIP/Postal Codei,':, Signature v v 21 1-r- ft" V1, 'R. March 29, 2000 Mayor Dennis Maetzold Council Members; Nan Faust James Hovland Scott Johnson Michael Kelley Dear Mayor and Council Members; I write to request that you reject the current Opus /Clark proposed development plan, and instruct them to submit a revised plan which takes no land from Sherwood Park. Last Fall, during the process of selecting a developer for the Kunz -Lewis site, Opus Northwest and Ron Clark Construction's original proposal for their development, "Grandview Square ", entirely eliminated the existing neighborhood park, Sherwood Park. Their second proposal, presented to the HRA, the City Council, and the Richmond Hills neighborhood in a neighborhood meeting, left Sherwood Park as it currently is. As you will recall, residents of Richmond Hills expressed their concern to this developer and to the City Council that land in Sherwood Park not be used in this development. Both the developer and the City Council gave assurances that existing parkland would not be used in this development. On Monday March 27, 2000, I attended a presentation by Opus /Clark at Our Lady of Grace. Their most recent proposal involves "reallocating" a very large piece of Sherwood Park to their "town square" and siting four story condo /townhouses on the park. They claim that this will increase parkland; further they claim the neighborhood will have access to the "town square ". At best, these claims are a pleasant fiction. Opus /Clark's current proposal eliminates useful park space. This space is currently used by the neighborhood. In addition to the variety of sports, including but not limited to football, volleyball, soccer, baseball, and softball, played or practiced by neighborhood children; that space provides a wide open play area for kite flying, Frisbee, running, etc. Such space is not readily available elsewhere in the area. The Richmond Hills neighborhood uses the existing Sherwood Park. It is the only city park readily and safely available to children in the neighborhood. In addition to recreational activities, Sherwood Park has served as a gathering place for neighbors and a wonderful location for birthday and graduation parties (my son's university graduation party was held there). Sherwood Park has also been a buffer between the existing single family homes in Richmond Hills and the business activity of the Grandview area. I described the developer's claims regarding their use of the Park as, at best, a pleasant fiction. By changing Sherwood Park's present space, there will no longer be sufficient open space for athletic or recreational activities (other than jogging in place). Even though access is provided from the remnant of Sherwood Park to the proposed town square, I doubt children & adolescents will be welcome there—even should they desire to use that limited space. By several accounts, Mr. Clark believes that proximity to park areas such as Sherwood Park are a detriment to his developments, or at least to their expeditious sale. He may well be correct. I suspect that means he will seek to actively discourage uses of the Park and the town square which provide this effect. Neighborhoods and neighborhood parks are important to the quality of life here in Edina. The preferences of the existing neighborhood should be a concern of the Council, the HRA, the Planning Commission, and the Park Board. Please reject the developer's proposal and clearly indicate that no current land in Sherwood Park is to be used in this development. Sincerely, �,2,z- >kz John Menke 5301 Pinewood Trail Edina, MVN 55436 612- 922 -2608 145 University Avenue West, St. Paul, MN 55103 -2044 LMC Phone: (651) 281 -1200 - (800) 925 -1122 TDD (651) 281 -1290 League of Minnesota Cities LMC Fax: (651) 281 -1299 - LMCIT Fax: (651) 281 -1298 Cities promoting e:ce0enee i Web Site: }�ttp: / /www.lmnc.org March 27, 2000 TO: Members of the League of Minnesota Cities (Please distribute to other interested city officials) FROM: Susan Hoyt, LMC President RE: LMC POLICY COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP Although the 2000 legislature will not adjourn for several weeks, it is time to begin preparing for the 2001 legislative session. The League's policy development process begins with the formation of the League's four policy committees. Now is your opportunity to help the League establish its legislative policies and direct its legislative program for the coming two -year period. As a member of a League policy committee, you will be volunteering to participate in a total of three or four policy - committee meetings during the months of July, August and September. Committees are scheduled to meet during the weeks of July 10-14, August 14 -18, and September 18 -22. These meetings will be held at the League offices in St. Paul. The policy development process will conclude with the League's annual Policy Adoption Conference on November 17, 2001, where the full membership will ratify the policy committee recommendations. The four intergovernmental relations policy committees, which will deal with both state and federal issues ate: IMPROVING LOCAL ECONOMIES b Growth Management and Land Use b Boundary Adjustment b Housing b Transportation b Economic Development and Redevelopment b Telecommunications and Information Systems IMPROVING CITY SERVICE DELIVERY 0� Environmental Mandates b Elections b Ethics b Open Meetings b Government Innovation and Cooperation b Public Safety IMPROVING THE FISCAL FUTURE PERSONNEL SERVICES OF CITIES C> Personnel C> Financial Management of Cities b Pensions b Property Tax b Labor Relations b State Aid Programs b Data Practices -- OVER -- AN EQUAL OPPORTUN TY /AFFIRMATIVE AcnON EMPLOYER I would like to serve a two -year term on: Note: Please rank your preference from 1 (first choice) to 3 (last choice) ❑ IMPROVING LOCAL ECONOMIES ❑ IMPROVING CITY SERVICE DELIVERY ❑ IMPROVING THE FISCAL FUTURE OF CITIES ❑ PERSONNEL SERVICES Name: Title: Address: City /Zip: Home Phone: FAX: Work Phone: E -mail: League of IVlnnesota Cities 145 Uniyers MAvedpe,West - _,,_ .w AX:651/2115-4118 < r. UPDATE 2000 -4 MONDAY, MARCH 27, 2000 BUDGET SHOWDOWN LOOMS With a projected budget surplus that seems_ to never stop growing, it. appears that the Legislature and Governor Ventura will soon reach a showdown over tax policy and supplemental budget expenditures. In late February, the Department of Finance (the Department) released a forecast that predicted the budget surplus to have grown by $234 million. since the November 1999 forecast. This increase means there now is a general fund surplus of $1.818 billion for legislators to send back to taxpayers, spend or save. (Of that surplus, $1.018 has been dedicated to the property tax reform. account.) The additional $234 million is derived from two sources: (1) an increase in revenues received by the state totaling $222 million; and (2) a decrease in state expenditures in the amount of $12 million. Of the $234 million, $5 million is statutorily dedicated to the budget reserve account. According to the Department, the increased revenue was generated by the economic boom the state and the country have enjoyed in recent years. Joblessness is at an all - time low, consumers are optimistically spending money, and the stock market has continued- to generate profits for many investors. The decrease in spending is due primarily to a reduction in health care expenditures. The governor has recommended saving the vast majority of the surplus until the 2001 Legislative Session for use in his "Big Plan." ' Many legislators, on the other hand, would prefer to return the surplus to Minnesota taxpayers through tax rebates and permanent reductions, as well as some spending initiatives. The one agreement that legislators and the governor have reached is returning $450 million to taxpayers through another sales tax rebate. The rebate would work in the same fashion as it did in 1999, except that taxpayers would receive a rebate amount of approximately one - quarter of that received last summer. (Beginning on page 2, the House and Senate Omnibus Tax Bills are discussed in greater detail.) The MLC Update Is prepared by Robert G. Renner, Jr. and Jennifer J. Peterson Messedi d Kramer P.A., 145 University Avenue West Suite 450, St. Paul, MN 5510.4 Telephone (851) 228 -9757 Fax (851) 228 -9787 r Clearly, the budget surplus is both a blessing and a curse for the legislative process. Legislators and the governor have opposing plans for what should be done with the surplus and a compromise will likely be difficult to reach. We will keep you up to date on the budget negotiations throughout these final weeks of the session. LEGISLATORS COMPLETE COMMITTEE HEARINGS AND, BEGIN TO FOCUS ON CONFERENCE COMMITTEES These last few weeks of session are often the most exciting, as well as tiring, for those who are involved in the process. Beginning this week, conference'committees will meet each day in an effort to resolve differences between House and Senate positions on more than a dozen bills, including the Omnibus Tax and Bonding bills. According to legislative leadership, the House and Senate will recess for a few days after passing all bills. The recess is expected to begin during the second week in April. By recessing, legislators will be able to return to session to override any surprise vetoes handed down by the governor. Because legislators will not have adjourned, the governor will have only three days upon receipt to sign or veto the bills sent to him. If he chooses not to sign a bill, it will become law without his signature. This strategy means that the Legislature will likely meet until April 20. HOUSE AND SENATE .TAX BILLS ADVANCE On Wednesday, March 22, the House Tax Committee adopted its 2000 Omnibus Tax Bill. Again this session, there is something for everyone in this bill — income tax cuts and deductions, property tax rate compression - and increases in tax credits to homeowners, to name just a few. The House should approve the tax bill by March 27. The Senate Tax Bill was approved by the Tax Committee on March 22 and was debated on the Senate Floor on Friday, March 24. Following the debate, the Senate laid the bill on the table because the Minnesota Constitution requires that tax and appropriation bills originate in the House. Once the House has passed its bill, the Senate will give its plan final approval and the conference committee process will begin. The Senate Tax Bill provides approximately $1.313 billion in tax relief. Of that total, $453 million will provide a sales tax rebate - $353.8 million is earmarked for this year and $99.2 million is slated to provide a rebate to individuals who did not get a rebate last year. In addition, the package .provides $23 million for agricultural assistance in disaster areas and extends the deadline for 1999 claims. The bill provides a total of $482 million in rebate and agricultural assistance. 2 i In the area of income tax relief, the bill increases the personal exemption by $.360 with a refundable credit option to provide $388.9 million in individual income tax relief. The bill also contains motor vehicle license tax reductions that total $233 million. The license tax reduction, though, is contingent upon passage of a constitutional amendment that dedicates 15 percent of the motor vehicle excise tax to the highway user tax distribution fund. If the amendment is not adopted the reduction in the registration tax is repealed. The provisions dealing with the registration tax also increase the depreciation applied to the base,value for each year of vehicle life. The measure also provides a total of $214.4 million in property tax relief;. $158.6 million in on -going relief and $55.8 million in onetime relief.' The House tax plan is much more ambitious and its provisions -are the focus of the remainder of this article.2 2000 Sales Tax Rebate As mentioned previously, there will be another sales tax rebate for Minnesota taxpayers totaling approximately $450 million. The amount each taxpayer will receive is based upon the same formula as last year. The formula estimated sales.taxes that would have been paid by parties based upon their income for that tax year. The minimum rebate is $129 for married couples filing joint returns and $73 for individuals and married couples filing separately. The maximums are $1,860 for joint returns and $930 for individuals and married filing separately taxpayers. The rebate is based upon 1998 income tax filings. All Minnesota residents who, in 1998, had a pre- credit,tax liability of one dollar, filed for a property tax rebate, or had social security income are eligible, for the rebate. Limited Market Value Ignoring pleas by local governments and tax policy organizations such as the Minnesota Taxpayers Association, the House will again attempt to limit market ,value growth for residential, agricultural and noncommercial- seasonal recreational property. Although it has been argued that such devices create a more complicated and less fair system, this provision would reduce the limitation on the amount a property's market value may grow from one assessment year to the next from 8.5 percent to 7 percent. Source: Minnesota Senate Tax Committee Update 2 Source: Much of the information for this portion of the article was provided by House Research 3 Income Tax Cuts If the House should prevail in conference committee, Minnesota income taxpayers will receive another rate reduction for taxes payable in 2001. The cuts are as follows: Married Filing Rate on Taxes Rate on Taxes Jointly Payable 2000 Payable 2001 <$76,000 (1999 Income) (2000 Income) First Tier 5.5% 5.0% 0 — 25,220 Second Tier 7.25% 6.5% 25,221 — 100,200 1.2% 1.0% Third Tier 8.0% 7.5% > 100,200 1.65% 1.5% It is expected that 'the House income tax plan will face opposition from the Senate majority that is proposing an increase in the personal exemption_ amount rather than rate cuts. The primary foe, however, will be Governor Ventura (see page 1). Properly Tax Rate Compression The House Tax Bill would provide for Phase III property tax reform that has been discussed in previous MLC Updates. The new rates as proposed by the House are: Class Type Current Law — Pay 2000 Proposed (Pay 2001) Residential Homestead: <$76,000 1.0% 1.0% >$76,000 1.65% 1'.5% Residential Non - Homestead Single Unit <$76,000 1.2% 1.0% >$76,000 1.65% 1.5% 2 -3 Unit/Undeveloped Land 1.65% 1.5% Apartments: Regular 2.4% 2.0% Low - Income 1.0% 1.0% Small City 2.15% 2.0% Seasonal Recreational Residential <$76,000 1.2% 1.0% >$76,000 1.65% 1 1.5% 4 Education Homestead Credit The House Tax Bill also increases the Education Homestead Credit from 83% of the general education property tax levy with a maximum of $390, to 88% with a maximum of $535. Levy Limits The House bill continues its annual assault on local autonomy by again extending levy limits on local governments for another year. If the House position holds through conference committee, levy limits will be in effect for taxes payable in 2001. (Currently, the law sunsets levy limits after taxes payable in 2000.) New Referendum Market Values In another attempt to reduce the property taxes paid by cabin owners and farmers, the House bill alters the method of determining market value of property upon which new referenda will be spread. For all school referendum levies approved after January 1, 2001, the market value for seasonal recreational property will be set at 50% of its actual market value, and any property with a class rate of less than,one percent (i.e. farms) will be included at its net tax capacity rate multiplied by 100. Tax Increment Financing The majority of Tax Increment Financing (TIF) law changes made in the House bill are clarifications. However, there are a few changes that should be noted. First, the House bill eliminates the 11 -year duration limit for economic development districts and reduces the limit based upon the first collection of increment from nine to eight years. Second, TIF districts that are subject to percentage pooling restrictions may use up to an additional ten percent of their increment for low- income rental housing outside of that district. Finally, the state aid program that funds deficits in TIF districts caused by reductions in class rates is extended to cover additional shortfalls that may be created by this year's additional rate compression. Truth in Taxation and Reverse Referenda The House Tax Bill contains a provision that provides. for a reverse referendum in counties or cities with more than 2,500 residents if the governmental unit has adopted a property tax levy which has increased its levy from the previous year by the greater of (1) two percent or (2) the combined increase in inflation added to the percentage increase in the number of households in the jurisdiction. The reverse referendum will 5 be voted upon if five percent of the jurisdiction's registered voters sign a petition calling for the referendum. The election would be held on the last Tuesday in January. There is also a provision in the House bill releasing cities and counties that have a population of more than 2,500 from the requirement to hold a truth -in- taxation hearing if its proposed property tax levy has not increased over its previous year's levy. Transit Pass Tax Credit A proposal that was first discussed last session returned to the debate this year. Representative Dan McElroy (R- Burnsville) pursued this plan, which gives businesses an income tax credit equal to 30 percent of the cost of transit passes provided to employees. This credit is available to certain businesses that provide free or reduced cost transit passes, with the 30 percent credit based upon the company's expenses not reimbursed by employees. Local Transit Levies The House Tax Bill makes changes in transit funding; specifically it shifts it from the property tax to the state general fund. To pay for this change in funding mechanism, the House proposes reducing the HACA paid to all cities that fall within the Metropolitan Council's transit taxation district. The reduction will be equal to that of the Metropolitan Council's (or opt- out's) levy within each jurisdiction, thereby not increasing the tax burden for city residents. However, it will appear that each city's tax levy has increased by the amount of HACA lost. The Metropolitan Council and other transit supporters are opposed to this provision, as it will put transit in the position of competing with education, healthcare and other state responsibilities for funding. With no dedicated funding source, it is impossible to guarantee that transit will receive adequate funding each year. (It should also be noted that the House Omnibus Transportation Finance Bill includes a provision allowing additional communities to become opt -out transit providers.) Apportionment Formula for Multi -State Businesses One of Representative Ron Abrams' (R- Minnetonka) primary goals this session was to change the apportionment formula for businesses. He discussed this proposal at length in the January 4, 2000 MLC Update. This portion of the bill changes the formula upon which business taxes are paid from 70 percent sales, 15 percent property and 15 percent payroll to an 80 -10 -10 split for year 2000 taxes and 90 -5 -5 for the year 2001. The amount of corporate income tax relief provided by these changes amount to $23.8 million in 2001 and $32.7 million in 2002. 0 MESSERLI & KRAMER P.A. LAUNCHES WEBSITE Messerli & Kramer P.A. recently merged onto the information highway with a website to provide its clients with helpful information and links. To get to the Messerli website, go to www.messerlikramer.com. For information on your lobbyists, click on the Government Relations Department and you will find out general departmental information. By clicking on "Links" at the top of the Government Relations page, you will find links to direct you to the Legislature, the Legislature's bill tracking service, offices of Constitutional Officers and the Metropolitan Council, to name just a few. Each week, Messerli & Kramer will also post a combined daily schedule of legislative committee hearings and floor sessions. Currently, this schedule may be accessed under the "What's New" section of the Government Relations opening page. In the future, it is expected that there will be a link to daily newspaper headlines and a weekly list of upcoming political fundraisers. We hope that you utilize this website and find it helpful to keep yourself up to date on legislative and political activities. 7 1") �� _ f LI Just to let you know how much your thoughffuln ess is truly appreciattel-A. Jrhank You VC - Pa.rf-) C) n c, M P.A ic-S v& k,#%,a-L4 PN M _ i \ / SS v - Sul, �deh Professional ` / Association / l Certified Public I \ \ Accountants / — \ i & Management / — — - \Consultants _ , THE EDINA FOUNDATION FINANCIAL STATEMENTS WITH SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND 1998 THE EDINA FOUNDATION FINANCIAL STATEMENTS WITH SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Independent Auditors' Report 1 Financial Statements: Statements of Financial Position 2 Statements of Activities 3 Statements of Functional Expenses 4 Statements of Cash Flows 5 Notes to Financial Statements 6 Supplemental Information: Independent Auditors' Report on Supplemental Information 9 Grants Payable 10 Organization 11 We have audited the accompanying statements of financial position of The Edina Foundation as of June 30, 1999 and 1998, and the related statements of activities, functional expenses and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Foundation's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of The Edina Foundation as of June 30, 1999 and 1998, and the changes in its net assets and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Financial Plaza 7200 Metro Boulevard Edina, Minnesota 55439 100, !� • �. 612/831 -6499 Edina, Minnesota October 14, 1999 Fax 831 -1219 W A Y S- A member of Moores Rowland A worldwide association of independent accounting firms To the Board of Directors Professional Association The Edina Foundation Certified Public Edina, Minnesota Accountants & Management Consultants INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT We have audited the accompanying statements of financial position of The Edina Foundation as of June 30, 1999 and 1998, and the related statements of activities, functional expenses and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Foundation's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of The Edina Foundation as of June 30, 1999 and 1998, and the changes in its net assets and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Financial Plaza 7200 Metro Boulevard Edina, Minnesota 55439 100, !� • �. 612/831 -6499 Edina, Minnesota October 14, 1999 Fax 831 -1219 W A Y S- A member of Moores Rowland A worldwide association of independent accounting firms THE EDINA FOUNDATION STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION June 30, 1999 1998 ASSETS Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents $ 272,486 $ 315,276 Interest receivable 6,902 9,655 Investments 1,714 1,766 Contributions receivable 3,503 13,967 Total current assets 284,605 340,664 Non - current assets: Computer equipment 3,070 - Less accumulated depreciation (306) 2,764 - Total assets 287,369 S 340,464 LIABILITIES AND NET ASSETS Current liabilities: Grants payable $ 66,101 $ 36,389 Other payables 13,757 6,869 Total current liabilities 79,858 43,258 Net assets: Unrestricted: General 33,800 47,557 Designated as endowments 172,437 172,437 Temporarily restricted 1,274 77,412 Total net assets 207,511 297,406 Total liabilities and net assets S 287,369 S 340,664 See Notes to Financial Statements. 2 THE EDINA FOUNDATION STATEMENTS OF ACTIVITIES Functional expenses: Program grants 121,944 24,246 Fundraising 30,160 30,629 Management and general 17,877 14,405 Total expenses 169,981 69,280 Increase (decrease) in unrestricted net assets (13,757) 32,756 Changes in temporarily restricted net assets: Investment return 112 112 Net assets released from restriction (76,250) - Increase (decrease) in temporarily restricted net assets (76,138) 112 Change in net assets (89,895) 32,868 Net assets, beginning of year 291,406 264,538 Net assets, end of year S 207,511 S 297,406 See Notes to Financial Statements. 3 Years Ended June 30, 1999 1998 Changes in unrestricted net assets: Support and revenue: Mail campaign $ 9,260 $ 17,831 April in Paris Ball (net of direct benefits of $27,125) 20,051 - Camp Rosland Event (net of direct benefits of $7,932) 5,768 - Celestial Ball (net of direct benefits of $21,246) - 49,669 Summer Slice Golf Event (net of direct benefits of $5,948) - 6,542 Memorials and other 34,551 4,607 Investment income 9,999 21,043 Net appreciation (depreciation) on investments (52) 27 Recovery — Piper Jaffray litigation 397 2,317 Total support and revenue 79,974 102,036 Net assets released from restriction 76,250 Total unrestricted support and revenue 156,224 102,036 Functional expenses: Program grants 121,944 24,246 Fundraising 30,160 30,629 Management and general 17,877 14,405 Total expenses 169,981 69,280 Increase (decrease) in unrestricted net assets (13,757) 32,756 Changes in temporarily restricted net assets: Investment return 112 112 Net assets released from restriction (76,250) - Increase (decrease) in temporarily restricted net assets (76,138) 112 Change in net assets (89,895) 32,868 Net assets, beginning of year 291,406 264,538 Net assets, end of year S 207,511 S 297,406 See Notes to Financial Statements. 3 Alliance Francais French Immersion Edina Family Center Playground Edina ABC Foundation Edina Fire Department Child Education Edina Heritage Preservation Board Edina Art Center Media Materials Edina Senior Center "Vial of Life" Edina Park & Rec Scholarship Fund Parent Communication Network V EAP /Cornerstone City of Edina - Edina Art Center Normandale French Immersion Elementary School Ken Rosland Honorary Scholarship Ikola Scholarships N.C. Little Memorial Hospice, Inc. Normandale French Immersion Elementary School Edina Fire Department Executive Director Administrative Support Postage/Printing Supplies Professional Fees Miscellaneous Bond Depreciation Program Grants In Excess Of One -Year Written Off THE EDINA FOUNDATION STATEMENTS OF FUNCTIONAL EXPENSES (1,307) - - (1,307) (10,331) S 121,944 S 30 160 S 17 -877 S 169,981 S----24,246 See Notes to Financial Statements. 4 Total 700 1,500 16,052 2,525 3,050 3,974 2,140 1,000 1,000 2,636 28,698 2,055 8,884 1,981 1,000 2,307 109 (10,331) $ 69 ZRD Year Ended June 30, 1999 Year Ended June 30, 1998 Management Management Program Grants Fundraising and General Total Program Grants Fundraising and General $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 700 $ - $ - - - - - 1,500 - - - - - - 16,052 - - - - - - 2,525 - - - - - - 3,050 - - - - - - 3,974 - - - - - - 2,140 - - - - - - 1,000 - - - - - - 1,000 - - - - - - 2,636 - - 75,000 - - 75,000 - - - 5,000 - - 5,000 - - - 1,000 - - 1,000 - - - 1,200 - - 1,200 - - - 2,000 - - 2,000 - - - 18,551 - - 18,551 - - - 20,500 - - 20,500 - - - - 17,946 9,676 27,622 - 20,462 8,236 - - 3,180 3,180 - - 2,055 - 12,214 - 12,214 - 8,884 - - - 1,680 1,680 - - 1,981 - - 1,000 1,000 - - 1,000 - - 1,926 1,926 - 1,283 1,024 - - 109 109 - - 109 - - 306 306 - - - (1,307) - - (1,307) (10,331) S 121,944 S 30 160 S 17 -877 S 169,981 S----24,246 See Notes to Financial Statements. 4 Total 700 1,500 16,052 2,525 3,050 3,974 2,140 1,000 1,000 2,636 28,698 2,055 8,884 1,981 1,000 2,307 109 (10,331) $ 69 ZRD THE EDINA FOUNDATION STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents See Notes to Financial Statements. 5 Years Ended June 30, 1999 1998 Cash flows from operating activities: Change in net assets $ (89,895) $ 32,868 Adjustments to reconcile change in net assets to net cash flows from operating activities: Net depreciation (appreciation) on investments 52 (27) Depreciation 306 - Interest receivable 2,753 (7,249) Contributions receivable 10,464 61,033 Grants payable 29,712 (13,843) Other payables 6,888 6,318 Net cash flows from operating activities (39,720) 79,100 Cash flows from investing activities: Purchase of computer equipment (3,070) - Net change in cash and cash equivalents (42,790) 79,100 Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year 315,276 236,176 Cash and cash equivalents, end of year S 272,486 S 315,276 See Notes to Financial Statements. 5 THE EDINA FOUNDATION NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND 1998 1. Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Organization The Edina Foundation is a charitable organization, incorporated in 1977 through the joint efforts of the Edina Board of Education and the Edina City Council. The Foundation was established to provide a central source for receiving gifts and making grants for the benefit of the Edina School District, City of Edina and other local civic groups. Financial Statement Presentation The Foundation reports information regarding its financial position and activities according to three classes of net assets: unrestricted net assets, temporarily restricted net assets and permanently restricted net assets. Unrestricted net assets are not subject to donor imposed stipulations. Temporarily restricted net assets are subject to donor imposed stipulations that may or will be met, either by actions of the Association and/or the passage of time. When a restriction expires, temporarily restricted net assets are classified to unrestricted net assets and reported in the statement of activities and changes in net assets as net assets released from restriction. Donor restricted contributions whose restrictions are met in the same reporting period are reported as unrestricted. Income Taxes The Foundation is exempt from Federal and State income taxes under the provisions of Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. Cash and Cash Equivalents For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, cash in banks, certificates of deposit and money market funds. Investments Investments in marketable securities with readily determinable fair values and all investments in debt securities are valued at their fair values in the statements of financial position. Unrealized gains and losses are included in the increase in net assets on the statements of activities. At June 30, 1999 and 1998, the cost of investments was $2,504, and the market value was $1,714 and $1,766, respectively. (Continued) THE EDINA FOUNDATION NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND 1998 1. Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) Computer Equipment Computer equipment is stated at cost. Depreciation is provided for using the straight -line method over the estimated useful lives of the equipment of five years. Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of support and revenue and functional expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. 2. City of Edina The Edina Foundation reimburses the City of Edina for the services of the Executive Director. The Executive Director receives a base salary plus ten percent (10 %) of the monies raised and collected based on the following: (1) Solicitation letters (any amount over $8,000). (2) Bequests received. (3) April in Paris Ball, golf or similar project (10% of net receipts). Under the agreement, total executive director expense was $27,622 and $28,698 for the years ended June 30, 1999 and 1998, respectively. 3. Donated Services No amounts have been recognized in the statements of activities for donated services because the criteria for recognition has not been satisfied. However, a substantial number of volunteers have donated significant amounts of their time to the Foundation's activities. (Continued) THE EDINA FOUNDATION NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND 1998 4. Temporarily Restricted Net Assets Temporarily restricted net assets at June 30, 1999 and 1998, are available for the following purposes: Amounts restricted for the Ikola Fund for grants to qualified Edina High School students Amounts restricted from the Kelly Family Fund to build an addition to the Edina Art Center 8 1999 1998 $ 1,274 $ 2,412 - 75,000 SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION Professional Association Certified Public Accountants To the Board of Directors & Management The Edina Foundation C° "suit ° "'s Edina, Minnesota INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT ON SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION Our report on our audits of the basic financial statements of The Edina Foundation for the years ended June 30, 1999 and 1998, appears on Page 1. We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards for the purpose of forming an opinion on the basic financial statements taken as a whole. The supplemental information on Pages 10 and 11 are presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. The supplemental information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audits of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. Edina, Minnesota I- r October 14, 1999 10, Financial Plaza 7200 Metro Boulevard Edina, Minnesota 55439 612/831 -6499 Fax 831 -1219 mpmW. i.I.&Yt --y A member of Moores Rowland A worldwide association of 9 independent accounting firms THE EDINA FOUNDATION GRANTS PAYABLE Date Balance Current Year Balance Made Programs — Purpose June 30, 1998 Additions (Payments) (Decreases) June 30, 1999 8/96 City of Edina Senior Bus $ 22,000 $ - $ - $ - $ 22,000 4/98 Parent Communication Network 1,000 - (1,000) - - 6/98 Alliance Franchise French Immersion 700 - - (700) - 6/98 Edina Fire Department Child Education 2,525 - (2,525) - - 6/98 Edina Heritage Preservation Board 3,050 - - - 3,050 6/98 Edina Art Center Media Materials 3,974 - (3,532) (442) - 6/98 Edina Senior Center "Vial of Life" 2,140 - (1,975) (165) - 6/98 Edina Park & Recreation Scholarship Fund 1,000 - (1,000) - - 8/98 City of Edina — Edina Art Center - 75,000 (75,000) - - 9/98 Normandale French Immersion Elementary School - 5,000 (5,000) - - 10/98 Ken Rosland Honorary Scholarship - 1,000 (1,000) - - 3 /99 Ikola Scholarships - 1,200 (1,200) - - 3/99 N.C. Little Memorial Hospice, Inc. - 2,000 - - 2,000 4/99 Normandale French Immersion Parents Organization - 18,551 - - 18,551 4/99 Edina Fire Department - S 36,389 20,500 $ 123251 - S (92.232) - S (1.307) 20,500 $ 66,101 See Independent Auditors' Report on Supplemental Information. 10 THE EDINA FOUNDATION ORGANIZATION The Board of Directors and Officers at June 30, 1999, were: Jim Van Valkenburg President Dennis Maetzold Vice President Jim Hovland Treasurer Jan Michaletz Secretary Otto Bang Jon Barnett Margo Hoppmann Sarah Jones Andy Otness Kevin Ries Fred Richards Ex- officio: Julie Hawes Executive Director Ken Dragseth Superintendent of Schools Gordon Hughes City Manager See Independent Auditors' Report on Supplemental Information. 11 ERNEST J. LARSON, JR., M.D. 4600 WEST 77TH STREET, SUITE 305 EDINA, MN 55435 OFFICE (612) 830 -0058 FAX (612) 830 -101 1 March 27, 2000 Mayor Dennis Maetzold City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Dennis, I'm writing relative to my concern about the decreased street maintenance that's been exhibited in Edina over the past several years. A city crew built a new apron and a drain on each side of the street at the corner of 70th and West Shore Drive several years ago. When light rains fall the water runs past the first drain and across the street to the second drain. This has to be a result of careless workmanship. Also, when the streets develop cracks, they aren't sealed in, a timely manner. They go several years being open to ice and water. The streets in Edina will soon be like many of the streets in Minneapolis —rough and full of patches instead of smooth like they've been for the previous 30 years. Another example of the sloppy workmanship done by city crews is the new street they put in to reach the golf course just north of 76th Street. The drains are settling and have dropped several inches since they were installed in the center of this roadway. Also, the road itself is deteriorating and there were four.or five large holes measuring 10,,x10,,x10 .,r in this street until they patched them up in the last few days. I don't know why this deterioration is being allowed to occur, but I know that once you are apprised of it, you won't allow it to go on. Dennis, I would appreciate a note from you explaining why this problem has developed and continued for such a lengthy period of time, and what can be done to return to the former high standards of maintenance. Sincerely, Ernest J. Larson, Jr. EJL:NGS 5700 Tucker Lane Edina, MN 55436 March 20, 2000 The Honorable Dennis Maetzold Mayor, City of Edina Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50'' St. Edina, MN 55424 Dear Dennis: I read in a recent Sun Current that the Council has approved a number of improvements to ease the traffic through the Parkwood Knolls area. I live adjacent to Lincoln Drive, less that a block from Dovre Drive, the westerly entrance /exit to and from the Parkwood Knolls area. I often use that entrance /exit in my travels through the Parkwood Knolls area, even during the evening rush hours. While there is increased traffic through the Parkwood Knolls area during the evening rush hours, principally from cars exiting the Opus complex, I have never observed cars being driven recklessly or at excessive speeds. Nor have I observed children (or for that matter, adults) on or near Dovre, Londonderry or Parkwood who might be endangered by such traffic. In any case, the improvements approved by the Council are all interrelated and should not be undertaken unless all the improvements have been approved and funded by the appropriate authorities. That is especially true of the traffic signal to be installed at the intersection of Vernon and Gleason. Since I regularly use City Vernon to enter County Vernon, I can attest to the traffic congestion at that intersection during morning and evening rush hours. Regardless of the County's priority factor for a traffic signal at that intersection, it is dangerous to exit City Vernon onto County Vernon during the rush hours, and I would hope that the Council is firm in its resolve that that signal be installed. Yours Very Truly, 6ar 0Johnson P.S. I also agree with your "State of the City" comments that cut - through traffic in Edina is "still going to be a problem in the year 2020." And well beyond 2020, in my opinion. We should all bear that burden, including those living in the Parkwood Knolls area, as well as those like me, who live adjacent to the Lincoln Drive /City Vernon corridor. Memo To: Gordon Hughes, City Manager From: Mike Siitari Date: 03/27/00 Re: Minneapolis Off -leash Park Proposal On 3/23/00, 1 attended the Minneapolis Park Board informational meeting on the proposed off -leash dog area at 40"' & France. A copy of the meeting notice had also been mailed to the surrounding Edina residents who could be affected by the proposal. Members of Responsible Owners of Mannerly Pets (ROMP), a landscape architect and the Animal Control Manager presented information as follows: The Minneapolis Park Board has $10,000 designated for six or more off -leash areas. This amount should cover fencing and garbage cans. There is no funding for maintenance or staffing. An annual fee of $25 -35 per dog is proposed to help fund the maintenance activities. ROMP plans to have volunteers monitor the off -leash areas to help gain compliance. Two acres on the northern section of the Minneapolis land would be fenced in as the off - leash area. Entrances would be on the east and south side. The landscape architect designated Calvin Christian school as the best parking location. A representative from the school stood up and stated that they had not been contacted and they would not allow parking in their lot. Proponents gave the following information: The area is now a well -known off -leash area. By designating six sites throughout Minneapolis, the usage at this location would actually decrease. Crime rates would go down because the authorized usage would displace the juvenile parties taking place now. ROMP stated that once the dogs are off -leash their aggression is reduced. They claim that there are no reported dog bites in any off -leash area in the U.S or Canada. Joan Niemiec addressed the on- street parking concerns by pointing out that the Minneapolis chain of lakes is used by thousands of nonresidents who park on street. The potential for increase on street parking in Edina could be seen as a small cost for the benefits of the off -leash area. She also stated that pet owners are no different from soccer or softball players who park in the area now. They have a right to do so. Opponents, mainly Edina residents, voiced strong concern about the potential for increased traffic, noise and irresponsible pet owners who will use Weber Field and the school grounds as off -leash areas, especially those who do not want to pay the annual fee. • Page 1 i The meeting broke up with a proposal that the cities of St. Louis Park and Edina be contacted as potential partners. The lack of funds to do more than fence in a small area and the parking /traffic concerns had both proponents and opponents concerned. I spoke with three of the Minneapolis Park Commissioners after the meeting. They were all strongly in favor of the site and tried to convince me of the potential benefits. It appears that the site offers the benefits of an off -leash area to Minneapolis with many of the drawbacks pushed into Edina. I handed Joan Niemiec the attached letter asking her to submit any plans to the Edina City Council for review. : • Page 2 t ,qo Rc�� OFF -LEASH DOG RECREATION AREA PUBLIC MEETING AGENDA 7 :00 Welcome, Introductions, Process Joan Niemiec — Director of Community Planning, MPRB 7:15 Background Information and Site Selection Process Robin Hartl — (ROMP) Responsible Owner of Mannerly Pets Ken Griesbaber — Landscape Arcbitect, MPRB 7:45 Licensing Process and Enforcement Bob Morotto — Animal Control Manager . g :pp Question and Answers Closing --Next Steps 1� Joan Niemiec Director of Community Planning Minneapolis Park Board 200 Grain Exchange 400 South 4a' St. Mpls., MN 55415 Dear Ms. Niemiec: March 21, 2000 Thank you for notifying the city of Edina of the off -leash recreation area proposal for the Minneapolis property at 40'' St. and France Avenue in Edina. Although the proposal is a Minneapolis Park Board project, we do have concerns about the impact on the adjacent Edina residents, traffic safety and the enforcement of city animal control laws. Traffic safety issues and parking concerns at the site are major concerns for the project. There is no on street parking on the west side of France Avenue so people who park on the east side will have to cross a high volume arterial road to gain access to the site. The alternative to crossing France Avenue is to use adjacent Edina city streets for parking. If there is no dedicated off -street parking at the site, pedestrian and vehicular traffic on Edina residential streets will significantly increase. There are no sidewalks on the west side of France to handle the projected increase in pedestrians. Unless improvements are made, this site could be an accident waiting to happen. Edina City Code states that no dog shall be permitted to be off the premises of its owner unless it is restrained with a leash measuring ten feet or less in length. The proposed off -leash area would be in violation of our City Code. Weber Field is presently a high complaint location for animal violations, i.e. dogs running at large. The school and park have open land that dog owners regularly use for a leash free area, often without cleaning up after their dogs. Locating a leash free area next to Weber Fields and Calvin Christian School will exacerbate our enforcement problems with the spillover. We realize that the project is in the early planning stage. Once a plan is drawn up, please submit the proposal to the Edina City Council. This will allow them to review the proposal and amend the city ordinance, to permit an off -leash area in Edina, if the plan meets their approval. Sincerely, Michael Siitari Chief of Police Edina Police Department Administration (612) 826 -1610 4801 West 50th Street Investigations (612) 826 -1620 Edina, Minnesota Fax (612) 826 -1607 CC A'IA I3nA Pnlira ')d hr Tnn I ;na (ri ,)1 R7F. -1 wAn EDINA ASSET BUILDING STEERING COMMITTEE March 10, 2000 Meeting Minutes Present: Susan Heiberg, Anthony Sussman, Kelly Crowther, Rob Holahan, Gordon Hughes, Chace Anderson, Erica Fishman, John Keprios, Cathy Iverson, Christine Weymouth (co- chair), Terry Stevens, Linda Packard, Peter Hodne, and Doug Johnson (co- chair) Guest: Yi Du, Director of Assessment & Evaluation, Edina Public Schools Introduction: Doug indicated that the Town Meeting did not dig into the details of the Edina data.. Yi Du was asked to provide a more in -depth analysis of the material. Data Presentation: Yi reviewed the Edina data in detail. Members were provided copies of the slides for their files. Discussion: The group discussed the findings. A summary of the comments is as follows: * 13% of 12 graders are sad or depressed. *340 kids in 12 "' grade have seriously considered or attempted suicide. *Red flags: no role models, most adults seem to ignore youth & treatment of students (given poorer seats at hockey games (board and administration in good seats... kids in upper deck) *The assets seem to gloss over specific concerns. We should look at raw people numbers not just percentages. A 1% rating equates to 35 kids. There are a number of items that need to be addresses such as depression, suicide, serious chemical health issues, etc. *In the area of social competencies vs. involvement in the community- overprotective parents are certainly an issue. Let kids try to do something even if they "fail." Stop doing everything for them. How can they be involved in meaningful adult relationships if adults continue to put up barriers. *Related to a positive future 75% seems low. What do the other 75% feel ?! *Is the low percentage in 8 "' grade significant? How does this compare r with the norm? *Approximately 25% of the students have vulnerability *We have a strong positive religious component yet some high risk behavior. What are the religious institutions doing about this ?! *How do we listen to kids? They indicate they are supported but do not feel they can talk with parents. *Schools are in the education business. Why do we spend so much time and money on things like security guards? The school allows students to get out early for hockey. What about other stuff? What kind of message are we making to the students when we place sports as # 1. *Do the students tend to parallel the community? Edina has a high suicide rate and certainly a population that could be described as "driven." Isn't that the same thing the kids told us? *There is a drive to be "successful."... but where are the safety nets? *What happens to the average? *Group conclusion: We are more focused on achievers rather than a caring environment. Next Steps: A study group will meet prior to our next asset meeting. They will attempt to develop a vision and narrow our focus. They will attempt to provide possible scenarios for what we should do and suggest an action plan. This material will be reviewed at the next full committee meeting. The next asset committee meeting will be Friday, April 14, 2000 at Edina High School from 11:30 a.m. — 1:00 p.m. Lunch will be provided. The study group will be contacted by Doug's office to arrange a date prior to the full committee meeting. MINUTES OF THE RESCHEDULED MEETING OF THE EDINA HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD, TUESDAY, OCTOBER 19, 1999, AT 7:00 P.M. EDINA CITY HALL LOWER LEVEL CONFERENCE ROOM 4801 WEST 50TH STREET MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Gary Nyberg, John Cooney, Marilyn Curtis, John McCauley, Herman Ratelle, Lois Wilder and Donald Wray MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Joyce Repya I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: Mr. Ratelle moved for approval of the minutes from the September 29, 1999, meeting. Mr. McCauley seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. II. REPORT ON HISTORIC PROPERTIES RESEARCH: Chairman Nyberg reminded the Board that at its last meeting they decided the best approach to implement the Historic Context Study action plan would be to review the 78 properties identified as historic on the 1980 survey. He pointed out that although 628 properties were identified as historic, 550 of those properties make up the Country Club District which has already been thoroughly documented. Ms. Repya explained the approach she has taken with the research and shared the updated files with Board. Most of the information has come from assessing records, building permits and photographs. Board members reviewed the files and agreed that is a good idea to compiled all of the City information into a single file for each historically identified property. Ms. Repya pointed out that in addition to the historically significant properties, the inventory also includes more contemporary structures which have won architectural awards. The most recent date for an architecturally significant property is 1976, consequently, any property which has received an award since then would not be included. Ms. Repya asked if a member of the Board would be willing to investigate architecturally significant properties which have been recognized since 1976. Chairman Nyberg stated that the Minnesota Society of Architects should have that information and he would be happy to do the research. Following a brief discussion, Chairman Nyberg asked what next step the Board should take. Referring to Appendix C, The Action Plan of the Historic Context Study, Ms. Repya pointed out that after the heritage resource inventory has been reviewed and reorganized, the Board may wish to target a district or neighborhood in the City which was not identified in the previous resource study. Ms. Repya added that Morningside has a unique story in the City's history, having seceeded in the 1920's to become its own .village and coming back to join Edina in the mid -60's. A thorough examination of Morningside would be a worthwhile project too.. Ms. Curtis pointed out that Article V of the Action Plan clearly sets out topics to be researched, which includes the Morningside neighborhood. Chairman Nyberg asked if a neighborhood map of Edina had ever been created, pointing out that such a map with more defined neighborhoods would make it easier for the HPB to identify study areas. Ms. Repya stated that she would be happy to work on a neighborhood map of the City. Following a brief discussion, Board Members agreed Ms. Repya should continue her review of the historic properties, and once a neighborhood map is completed they will identify and prioritize study areas.. No formal action was taken. III. OTHER BUSINESS: CLG Grant Funds Received - Ms. Repya reported that the City has received $5950 from the Minnesota Historical Society for their portion of the Historic Context Study. She added that a request for payment has been submitted to the Edina Foundation for their $3,050 contribution, which together with the CLG funds completes the cash outlay for the project. The remaining $2,900 were in'- kind and volunteer contributions. IV. NEXT MEETING DATE: November 23, 1999 V. ADJOURNMENT: 7:45 p.m. Respectfully. subm 04/03/00 14:16 FAX 612 928 2693 EDINA CC 10002 ISEDINA 7701 Normandale Road • Suite 101 CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Edina, MN 55435 612 -806 -9060 - FAX: (612) 806 -9065 - WEB: http: / /www.edina.org - E -MAIL: chamber@edina.org EDINA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Fairview Southdale 2000 -2002 Expansion Project WHEREAS, Fairview Southdale Hospital is the Twin Cities' eighth largest hospital and has a reputation for outstanding patient care; and WHEREAS, Fairview Southdale Hospital, a non -profit organization, is Edina's largest year - round employer at more than 2000 employees, a good steward of the Edina Community and committed to meeting the needs of its immediate service area; and WHEREAS, the demographics of the Edina area point to increased demands for cardiovascular services. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Directors of the Edina Chamber of Commerce does hereby support the Fairview Southdale 2000 -2002 Expansion Project to increase its capacity to serve patients, families and the community. Adopted this 15`s day of March, 2000 f Chair of the Board President F71) sm-'011