Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2000-04-18_COUNCIL PACKET
AGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL APRIL 18, 2000 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Commissioner, Council Member or citizen so requests it. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the Agenda. * -I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA - Regular Meeting of April 4, 2000 Rollcall II. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS - as per pre -list dated 4/12/2000, TOTAL: $90,769.34 * III. SIGNATORY RESOLUTION & FACSIMLE SIGNATURES Excel Bank IV. ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Minutes of April 4, 2000 and Board of Review Minutes of April 10, 2000 II. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS - Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Planner Public Comment heard. Motion to close hearing. Zoning Ordinances: First and Second Reading require 4/5 favorable rollcall of all members of Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading.: 4/5 favorable rollcall of all members of Council to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall'vote required to pass. Conditional Use Permit: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. * A FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN Fairview Southdale Hospital,. 6401 France Avenue - South, Building Expansion And Parking Ramp - CONTINUED TO 5/2/00 * B. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, PARKING STRUCTURE 6400 FRANCE AVENUE Fairview Southdale Hospital, 6401 France Avenue South, - CONTINUED TO 5/2/00 Rollcall C. FINAL REZONING & FINAL PLAT - Frauenshuh Companies, 7101 West.78th Street * D. PRELIMINARY REZONING AND OVERALL DEVELOPMENT PLAN - Opus /Clark - Grandview Square - CONTINUED TO 5/2/00 Rollcall E. PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL Olinger Ridge, 5804 Olinger Road Rollcall F. FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL - K. E. Peters Billiard Supply, Inc., 7685 Parklawn Avenue Agenda /Edina City Council April 18, 2000 Page 2 III. AWARD OF BID A. Contract 00 -5 (ENG) Dakota Trail Lift Station B. Contract 00- 4(ENG) West 561h Street Curb and Gutter C. Retrofitted Engine & Pump onto Water Tanker Truck IV. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS A. Traffic Safety Report of April 3, 2000 B. Appeal of Administrative Penalty Case No. 00- 005040, Two Guy From Italy C. Appeal of Administrative Penalty Case No. 00- 005031, Daniel's, Italian Restaurant D. Appeal of Administrative Penalty Case No. 00- 005039, Eden Avenue Grill continued until 5 /2,/00 E. Resolution approving Transfer of Control KBL Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc. F. Approve Quit Claim Deed - MnDOT /City of Edina G. 2000 -2001 Labor Agreement Teamsters Local 320 (Police) H. 2000 -2001 Labor Agreement Local 320 (Animal Control) I. Receive Feasibility Report, Imp. A -189, School Road Street Resurfacing Improvement V. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS VI. CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS VII. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES VIII SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL IX. MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEM X. FINANCE Rollcall A. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS As Per Pre -List Dated 4/12/2000 TOTAL: $835,356.38 SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS Tues Apr 25 Volunteer Recognition Reception 5:00 P.M. EDINBOROUGH PARK Sat Apr 29 EDINA FOUNDATION GALA RADISSON SOUTH Tues May 2 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues May 16 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mon May 29 MEMORIAL DAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed Tues Jun 6 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBER Tues Jun 20 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Jul 4 INDEPENDENCE DAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed Wed Jul 5 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Jul 18 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS 7 memorandum Date: 04/14/00 To: Edina Board of Review Members From: Rick Petersburg, SAMA RE: Board of Review Reconvene -April 18, 2000 - 5:00 p.m. -Council Chambers This packet of information includes: • Updated assessor commentaries for Case #8, #10, #16, and #20. • Case #12 was inspected and the owner has agreed to accept the recommended value and withdraw from the Board proceedings. • Case #15 was inspected and has agreed to withdraw from the Board proceedings. • Copy of independent appraisal provided by Mr. Malby for case #6. • Board Action Summary worksheet. 04/01/98 1 CITY OF EDINA 2000 BOARD OF REVIEW MARKET VALUES AND CLASSIFICATION SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . ............ ... ..... ............ ........ ... ....... ............... 4 CqA ......... ........... ::::A. TY;MT V )t4.A ............ S. .... R.S ................. ....... ..... ......... ............... ........ ..... .. ........... QRfG Alex 5812 Hansen Road $ 236,400 $ 210,000 $ 224,500 Zhuravel 32-117-21-41-0068 2 Eduard 7133 Valley View Rd $ 215,200 $ 205,000 $ 215,200 Yamnik 07-116-21-21-0047 3 Lloyd V. 7405 Gleason Rd $ 348,800 $ 299,200 $ 348,800 Lofgren 08-116-21-32-0006 4 Larry .5124 Juanita Ave $ 260,500 $ 242,800 $ 260,500 Swandby 18-028-24-41-0149 $ 245,000 5 Norman P. 4622 Edgebrook P1 $ 1,073,800 $ 940,000 $ 1,073,800 Chapel 18-028-24-23-0058 6 Robert J. 6517 Limerick Ln $ 249,500 $ 220,000 $ 249,500 Malby 05-116-21-14-0043 7 Edward 4909 Rolling Green $ 622,000 $ 500,000 $ 622,000 None Required Owner McGlynn 29-117-21-13-0006 Withdrew 8 Richard B. 5608 Highland Rd $ 315,000 $ 234,000 $ 315,000 Perrin 32-117-21-43-0051 9 Jacqueline 5308 Halifax Ave $ 277,300 $ 248,000 $ 277,300 Mithun 18-028-24-44-0067 Page 1 of 4 CITY OF EDINA 2000 BOARD OF REVIEW MARKET VALUES AND CLASSIFICATION SUMMARY Page 2 of 4 ......... ... . .. . A .... . .......... ............... ..................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . ........ ..... ................ ............ . ............... V hAN ...... ................ ....... .......... . ..... ..... .... ..................... ... ....................... 10 Helen 6913 Mark Terrace Dr $ 193,100 $ 169,400 193,100 Holvelson 06-116-21-43M38 11 Shaner Hotel 3400 Edinborough Way $ 9,721,100 $ 7,700,000 $ 9,721,100 Group 32-028-24-34-0025 05-027-24-21-0004 12 Miguel 6609 Field Way $ 456,400 $ 396,000 $ 441,000 None Required Owner (15,400) Azar 31-117-21-24-0016 Accepted 13 Anthony J. 6417 Limerick Drive $ 195,800 $ 180,000 $ 195,800 Mitchell 05-116-21-14-"6 14 Duane H. 6505 Limerick Drive $ 202,600 $ 160,000 $ 202,600 Haglund 05-116-21-14-0040 15 Jean J. 6201 Hansen Road $ 200,900 $ 190,000 $ 200,900 None Required Owner $ Jiang 05-116-21-11-0070 Accepted 16 Burton C. 5048 Edinbrook Lane $ 158,800 $ 153,900 $ 158,800 Ruedy 28-117-21-24-0061 17 Debra A. 6124 Hansen Road $ 186,300 $ 172,500 $ 186,300 Neuger 32-117-21-44-"3 18 Elizabeth T. 5044 Edinbrook Lane $ 158,400 $ 129,000 $ 158,400 Jenson 28-117-21-24-0062 Page 2 of 4 CITY OF EDINA 2000 BOARD OF REVIEW MARKET VALUES AND CLASSIFICATION SUMMARY S ........... ....... .. . . . ...... .... . . . . . . . . . .... . . . . . ...... .. ... am ........ ....... . . . . . .. ...... ... . ... . ... ... . . . ............. .... ........... ...... MD. ........ .... ......................... WAV" ....................... 7770 C ............ .......... 19 Team France 7200 France Ave S $ 2,969,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,635,400 Partnership 31-028-24-14-0001 20 Danforth H. 6705 Samuel Road $ 328,000 $ 254,000 $ 328,000 Leach Jr. 06-116-21-32-0054 21 Prokash V. 5700 Long Brake Trail $ 775,500 $ 700,000 $ 800,000 Puram 08-116-21-31-0075 22 Frank 6125 Wilryan Avenue $ 399,000 $ 380,000 $ 399,000 Carclarelle 33-117-21-34-0122 23 Andy 4909 Trillium Lane $ 193,100 $ 181,000 $ 193,100 Poncius 31-028-24-22-0074 24 Christine K. 410 Madison Ave $ 57,000 Zero $ 57,000 Wellens 30-117-21-22-0116 25 Craig J. 6624 Limerick Drive $ 278,100 $ 252,000 $ 278,100 Zachman 05-116-21-41-0071 26 Stephanie M. 5348 Whiting Ave $ 169,000 $ 152,000 $ 152,000 None Required Owner (17,000) Lehman 05-116-21-11-0039 Accepted 27 Dorothy A. 5909 Ashcroft Ave $ 111,400 $ 104,200 $ 111,400 Kronlokken 19-028-24-31-0125 Page 3 of 4 . CITY OF EDINA 2000 BOARD OF REVIEW MARKET VALUES AND CLASSIFICATION SUMMARY ----- ----- - ............... 'M ........... ................ QR! GNA L ............. 28 Robert L. 6424 Aspen Road 267,500 218,000 $ 218,000 None Required Owner $ (49,500) 1 Kellogg 31-117-21-42-0037 Accepted $ - I $ - I $ - I $ - I $ - I $ - I $ - I Page 4 of 4 Case # 8 City of Edina Board of Review Assessor's Commentary Property I.D. Number: 32- 117 -21 -43 -0051 Date: 4/10/2000 Property Address: 5608 HIGHLAND ROAD Owner /Agent Name: RICHARD AND ANGELIA PERRIN 2000 EMV Requested Value Recommended Value 315,000 234,000 315,000 Comments: COMMENTARY UPDATE (SUPPLEMENT TO ORIGINAL COMMENTARY) An inspection was made on Monday, April 10„ 2000. The house is in average condition. The basement finish consists of a recreation room, a full bath and a three season porch (added in 1999). Main floor enlarged, front entry (1999), add den over porch, enlarge living room, remodel bedroom and add 1/2 bath. This bath was not complete on the date of the inspection. They are finishing some trim work and floors. Second floor consists of 2 bedrooms and a full bath. Square footage before addition was approximately 2645. Square footage after additions is 3017. Lists of homes East of Tracy, sold over $300,000. ADDRESS DATE PRICE SO. FT. STYLE 6328 Valley View Rd 9 -99 $335,000 2220 1 /Story 5808 Garden Ave 6 -99 $390,000 2171 1 /Story 5400 Grove St 2 -99 $345,000 2200 1 /Story 2 Story sales closest to subject 5809 Jeff Place 5 -99 $295,000 1989 2 /Story 5813 Amy Dr 4 -99 $305,000 2142 2 /Story 5704 Cahill Rd 2 -99 $379,000 1430 2 /Story Value 1999 - $ 80,000 $ 147,000 $ 227,000 History 1998 $ 44,500 '$ 167,700 $ 212,200 1997 $ 44,500 $ 161,600 $ 206,100 Sale Mar -95 $ 225,000 History Case # 10 City of Edina Board of Review F- Assessor's Commentary Property I.D. Number: 06- 116 -21 -43 -0038 Date: 4/10/2000 Property Address: 6913 MARK TERRACE DRIVE 10wner/Agent Name: HELEN HOVELSON 2000 EMV Requested Value Recommended Value 193,100 169,400 193,100 Comments: The subject property is located at 6913 Mark Terrace Drive. The residence is a rambler, built in 1955, with 1296 above grade square feet. The main level includes 3 bedrooms, 1 full bath, a standard room layout, a fireplace, a two car attached garage, and an attached glazed porch. About one half of the basement area is finished; it is of fair to poor quality (no floor cover), and the basement bathroom is very poor quality. The property owner has indicated that basement repair from water damage would cost about $10,000. This property was inspected during our 1999 quartile review of District 40. 1 reviewed the exterior of the residence on August 4, 1999 and the interior on September 3 1999. The year 2000 assessment of the property was determined by applying the 14 percent neighborhood factor against the 1999 value. This property was treated the same as all other Braemar district residences. The property owner's assessment objection seems to be based entirely on the 1999 inspection. In her objection, she states that "He said the market value would not be raised because of the terrible condition of the basement." No such statement was made to the property owner. During our quartile reviews, property owners will frequently ask if their assessment will increase due to the inspection. We advise property. owners that the main purpose of the review is to verify the accuracy of our property descriptions, and that we do not revalue individual residences as we proceed through the review. Our caveat is that assessable improvement, that were constructed without a building permit would be added Ito the base assessment. We then advise owners that in the absence of such newly discovered improvements, no additional value would be added to the base, and that only the neighborhood increase would be applied. I am very careful in this explanation. I do not recall the particulars of my conversation with Mrs. Holvelson, but I suspect that she did not fully understand my explanation. I am quite certain of one fact: no statement was made that her assessment would be frozen. Ample market evidence supports.the year 2000 assessment, and suggests that if anything, the value is low. Value 1999 $ 110,000 $ 59,400 $ 169,400 History 1998 $ 46,500 $ 111,900 $ 158,400 1997 $ 46,500 $ 110,400 $ 156,900 Sale Oct -71 $ 39,500 History Case # 10 City of Edina Pg. 2 Board of Review 5 *� (. 3 C Y- 9 ��iti �As� � A tl A Assessor's Commentary Comments Cont. During the prior sales study period there were six residential sales along Mark Terrace Drive. Three sales were one level residences with one split entry sale and two, two level sales. The average sale price of the four one level residences was $164 per square foot. This amount is very typical of comparable Edina residential sales. Those four sales included: 7005 Mark Terrace Drive: $265,000/1686 sq.ft. _ $157.18 sq.ft. 6921 Mark Terrace Drive: $275,000/1586 sq.ft. _ $173.39 sq.ft. 6920 Mark Terrace Drive: $330,000/2476 sq.ft. _ $133.28 sq ft. 7016 Mark Terrace Drive: $365,000/1897 sq.ft. _ $192.41 sq.ft. Total of 4 Sales= $356.26/4= $164.07.Call $164 per square foot t $164 per square foot, the approximate market value of the subject property would be $212,500. In an fort to give the property owner the benefit of doubt, $10,000 can be subtracted from that Sure for the deferred basement repair and another $1,000 for the basement 3/4 bathroom (Hennepin ounty replacement cost). Those adjustments suggest that the property market value is approximately 201,500, or $155 per square foot. the irony of this appeal is that the property owners own data submission supports the above value and our lower assessment. The residence at 6913 Mark Terrace Drive was appraised in March 1998 for $180,000. The 1998 Braemar neighborhood market factor was 7 percent while the 1999 factor was 14 ) ercent. it is common appraisal practice to adjust either sales or appraisals to a target date, which is January 2, 2000 in this situation. The time adjusted appraisal calculates as: 180,000 X .07 = $12,600 / 12 = $1,050. $1,050X9 = $9,450. 180,000 X .14 = $25,200. 180,000 + $9,450 + $25,200 = $214,650. Hovelson's 1998 appraisal already reflects lost value due to the condition of the basement. n summary, the year 2000 property assessment is $193,100; an extracted value from recent Mark Terrace )rive sales is $201,500; and, the time adjusted equivalent of the appellant's own appraisal is $214,650. Nhile an assessment increase may be warranted, there is no evidence that a reduction is in order. UPDATED COMMENTARY The additional information requested by the Board follows: 7005 Mark Terrace Drive: $265,000/1686 sq.ft. _ $157.18 sq.ft. 6921 Mark Terrace Drive: $275,000/1586 sq.ft. _ $173.39 sq ft. 6920 Mark Terrace Drive: $330,000/2476 sq.ft. _ $133.28 sq.ft. 7016 Mark Terrace Drive: $365,000/1897 sq.ft. _ $192.41 sq.ft. Total of 4 Sales = $656.26/4 = $164.07. Call $164 per square foot Case # 16 City of Edina. Board of Review Assessor's Commentary Property I.D. Number: 28- 117 -21 -24 -0061 Date: 4/10/2000 Property Address: 5048 EDINBROOK LANE Owner /Agent Name: BURTON AND MARJORIE RUEDY 2000 EMV Requested Value Recommended Value 158,800 ? 158,800 Comments: Case number 13 through 18 all have the same concern as case number 1 and 6. Please refer to the commentaries for both of those cases for additional information. The only additional data which may be relevant are several comments from an appraisal completed on July 17, 1998 and provided by Debra Neuger. In that appraisal, in both the Site Comments and External Obsolescence section, the appraiser observes that due to the depth and wooded features of the lot negative influence from the existing railway is minimized. The Canadian Pacific Railroad has been in existence for many years and buyers and sellers have reacted to that condition. The feasibility study is currently a political animal and to remain unbiased we must stay out of that arena. As appraisers, we can only react to changes in the market. When and if the market recognizes any change in value due to the High speed Commuter Rail Feasibility Study we will recognize it in the upcoming assessment. CORRECTED COMMENTARY The EMV of $153,900 that was provided in the original commentary is in error, this is actually the Limited Market Value for 2000. The correct Market value for 2000 is $158,800, and has been replaced in the 2000 EMV and recommended Value section. Value 1999 $ 50,500 $ 91,300 $ 141,800 History 1998 $ 29,500 $ 101,800 $ 131,300 1997 $ 29,500 $ 98,000 $ 127,500 Sale Sep -78 $ 67,000 History Case # 20 City of Edina Board of Review Assessor's Commentary Property I.D. Number: 06- 116 -21 -32 -0054 Date: 4/10/2000 Property Address: 6705 Samuel Road Owner /Agent Name: Dan & Virginia Leach 2000 EMV Requested Value Recommended Value 328,000 254,000 328,000 Comments: COMMENTARY UPDATE (Supplement to original Commentary) An appointment was scheduled with Virginia the night of the board meeting, to inspect the home on Wednesday April 12, at 8:30. Wednesday morning a message was left on my voice mail that they would not be home at the time of the scheduled appointment. The original square footage of the home before the addition was 1609 square feet. Approximately 888 square feet were added, making the total first floor area to be 2497. The project was started in August of 1998, and partially assessed for the 1999 assessment. Then in November of 1999, a woman was leaving the home and told me that Dan was inside and to knock on the door. No one answered the door, so I left a notice. We did not hear from the home owners again. After reviewing the plans and estimating the finished area, $73,000 of improvement value was added for the 2000 assessment. The subject also received the district increase. The three most comparable properties are: 6709 Samuel Road sold for $245,000 - 2/1999, 1666 square feet. 6704 West Trail sold for $327,500 - 8/1999,1524 square feet 6521 Navaho Trail sold for $339,900 - 6/1999, 2064 square feet. Chapter 243, Article 5, Section 24 "Access By Assessor" in part, states, "If the assessor is refused entry, the local board of review may not adjust the market value or classification in a way that would benefit the property. This amends Minn. Stat. 273.20 and 274.01. subd 1. Effective May 26, 1999 and for taxes payable in 2000 and thereafter After the cursory review the comparables show a value of $350,000. We ask that the Board sustain the 2000 Estimated Market Value of $328,000. Value 1999 $ 75,000 $ 153,000 $ 228,000 History 1998 $ 47,000 $ 148,000 $ 195,000 1997 $ 47,000 $ 140,700 $ 187,700 Sale Mar -91 $ 203,000 History Feb -72 $ 53,000 Feb -68 $ 39,000 Case # 12 City of Edina Board of Review Assessor's Commentary Property I.D. Number: 31- 117 -21 -24 -0016 Date: 4/10/2000 Property Address: 6609 FIELD WAY Owner /Agent Name: MIGUEL M & SILVIA AZAR 2000 EMV Requested Value Recommended Value 456,400 '396,000 441,000 Comments: COMMENTARY UPDATE (Supplement to original Commentary) Inspected home Tuesday April 11, 2000. The home is fair to average condition. The basement has approximately 1008 square feet finish, which is average or original finish. Recreation room sliding glass door (needs repair) leads to outside stairs which walks up to side yard. The 3/4 bath has had some repairs done to the shower. The main entry is open to the second story, it has the original floor. Dining room has parquet floors. Living , room has the original carpet. The family room has panel walls, wood floors, and sliding glass door to patio. The 1/2 bath is average. The kitchen has been remolded, new cabinets, appliances including ovens, refrigerator, center island. The cabinets have two different finishes (dark and Light). First floor laundry room with 1/2 bath has good finish. The garage is fair to average condition. The second floor 4 bedrooms and 1 office or den. Some of the floors have been remodeled to wood. The master bedroom has a walk in closet and 3/4 bath. The 3 bedrooms are good sized and the full bath is average. The roof is about 5 years old, and the siding and soffits do need some repairs. The patio is pulling away from the house structure. After reviewing comparable sales in the Parkwood Knolls area of similar size, style and quality/condition (adjusting for all subject deficiencies), we recommend reduction to $441,000. Value 1999 $ 114,900 $ 282,000 $ 396,900 History 1998 $ 84,900 $ 249,600 $ 334,500 1997 $ 84,900 $ 243,100 $ 328,000 Sale History 6609 Field Way Edina -MN 55436 Estimates to upgrade some of the pressing deteriorating areas: I- DRIVEWAY: Surface about 2300 sq ft. Approximate cost per Sq Ft $ 7.00 total Pavers style 2- PAINTING: estimates to paint outside. Between 5 to 10,000.00 Ap. 3- SIDING. Repair of siding on back, east side. Between 15,000- 30,000Ap. 4- GARAGE. Ceiling, walls, windows. 5- PATIO. Cement removal, fixing house side, rim joints, new cement (440 sq ft). 6- LANDSCAPE. To correct water falling toward basement. Between 1 to 8,000.00 7- DAMAGED CEILINGS. To correct water damage in 3 rooms 8- BASEMENT. New carpet and fixing water damage on small office TOTAL ESTIMATE 1 Submitted on 4/11/2000 by Miguel Azar $ 73,000.00 $ 16.000.00 $ 22,000.00 $ 7,5000.00 $ 24,000.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 3,500.00 $ 3,500.00 $ 4,000.00 Russell Smith Associates, Inc. Real Estate Appraisers Fie No. APPRAISAL OF LOCATED AT: 6517 Limerick Drive Edina, MN 55439 FOR: Robert J Malby 6517 Limerick Drive Edina, MN 55439 BORROWER: Robert J Malby AS OF: March 10, 2000 BY: Gregory P. Smith, RAA Certified Residential Real Property Appraiser 750 Boone Avenue North, Suite 101, Minneapolis, MN 55427 (612) 545 4404 Russell Smith Associates, Inc. Real Estate Appraisers 6517 Limerick Drive Edina, MN 55439 File Number: 000152 Dear Sir or Madam: Fie No. 000152 In accordance with your request, I have personally Inspected and appraised the real property at: 6517 Limerick Drive Edina, MN 55439 The purpose of this appraisal is to estimate the market value of the subject property, as Improved. The property rights appraised are the fee simple interest In the site and Improvements. In my opinion, the estimated market value of the property as of March 10, 2000 Is: $220,000 Two Hundred Twenty Thousand Dollars The attached report contains the description, analysis and supportive data for the conclusions, final estimate of value, descriptive photographs, limiting conditions and appropriate certifications. Sincerely, Gregory P. Smith, RAA Certified Residential Real Property Appraiser License 04002205 Exp. 8/31/2000 750 Boone Avenue North, Suite 101, Minneapolis, MN 55427 (612) erp ry De5cription UNIFORM RESIDENTIAL APPRAISAL REPORT File • ,P. gAdUmus_6517_L_i_m_erick Drive_ C�Edina State MN Legal Description LOT 5 BLOC_K_6 EDINA VALLEY ESTATES 2ND ADDITION County Hen Assessor's Parcel No. 051 1621 140043 Tax Year 1999 R_E. Taxes E 4 197.18 X 5 ecia 6unoeei Ruben J Malby Current Owner Robert J Malby Occr oanL Owner ',rynoomuod or Project Name N/A Price s N/A D PUD [—I Cundoninum Reference D4 -119 N/A Description and $ amount of loan chargeslconcessions to be Address 6517 Limerick Drive. Edina. MN 554 000152 ZyCode 55439 pin sessments s 0.00 Ll Tenant HOA$ N iad 239.01 sets None Appraiser Gre ur P. Smith RAA Address 750 Boone Avenue North 9101 Minneapolis, MN 55427 Location Li UI°an X Suburban Li Rum Predominant single family housing Present land use % Land use change Built up ❑X Over 75% ❑ 25 -75% ❑ Under 25% occupancy PRICE AGE One Farm 100% X Not liken ❑ Rapid ❑X Stable ❑ Stow Sj0°0j tr•r Y ❑ r ❑ Likely Growth refs ❑X Owner 200 low 10 2A family ❑ In process Property values ❑X Increasing ❑ Stable P ❑ Declining Tenant 500 H' h 50 MuRiFarriy To: Demand /supply ❑ Shortage ❑X In' ❑ Dv.suppty 0 Varxv@ft) Predominant Commercial Markelinq lime X Under 3 nos. FJ 3-6 mos. Over 6 nos, v. am a% 275 1 30 Note: Race and the racial composition of the neighborhood are not appraisal factors. Neighborhood boundaries and characteristics: The subject's neighborhood runs trom County Road 62 on the north to 70th Street On the south and from State Highway 100 on the east to Tracy Road on the west in the city of Edina. Factors that affect the marketability of the properties in the neighborhood (proximity to employment and amenities, employment stability, appeal to market, etc.): The immediate neighborhood consists of 3 basic areas of homes. Humes similar to the subject property that are adjacent to the power lines and or railroad tracks homes that are adjacent to Nine Mile Creek and homes that _make_up- the- balance_of_the n 0— iFoorhoo described above. This area is close to schools shopping and employment, and is well maintained. This area has average market activity and average to good appeal. High power lines and a railroad track runs through the neighborhood A High Speed Commuter Rail Feasibility Study date 2 -16 -2000 for using existing railroad right of way is purposed Market conditions in the subject neighborhood (including support lot the above conclusions related to the trend of property values, demandisupply. and marketing time such as data on competitive properties for sale in the neighborhood, description of the prevalence of sales and financing concessions, etc.): Marketing time is currently under 3 months afthough some higher -priced properties and those in the shadow of the light rail study may stay on the market for longer periods of time The sales -to- asking price ratio is typically around 95% or better. Based on MLS statistics, supply and demand appear in balance. Concessions from sellers should not be necessary in the market place except in the area of the Iiaht rail studv. Project Information for PUDs (It applicable) - - Is the developeilbuilder in control of the Home Owners' Association (HOA)7 LJ YES X NO Approximate total number of units in the subject project N/A Approximate total number of units lot sale in the subject project N/A Describe common elements and recrealional lacillies: N/A BASEMENT INSULATION Dimensions 90 x 160 Foundation Conc. Blck. Topography Gently Rollin Site area 14400 Sq.FI. Corner lot LJ Yes X No Size Typical Specific zoning classification and description R -1 Single Family Dwelling Unit Gam space None Shape Rectangular Zoning compliance U Legal ❑ Legal nonconforming (Gr ndfathered use) LJ Illegal LJ No zoning Drainage ears Adequate Highest & best use as i oved: X Present use r I Other use (explain) Ceiling AcTile View Of Power Lines Utilities Public Other ON -site Improvements Type Public Private Landscaping Typical ray ❑X 100 Amp Street Asphalt Q ❑ Driveway Surface Concrete s �0 Water ox Curolguller Concrete ❑X ❑ Apparent easement High voltage ower Line Sanitary Q Sidewalk None ❑ ❑ FEMA Special Flood Hazard Area LJ Yes X No sewer Streetlights Yes Q ❑ FEMAZone C Map Dates -1 -80 Storm sewer X Alley None' Living FEMAMa No. 270160 Comments (apparent adverse easements, encroachments, special assessments, slide areas, illegal or legal nonconforming zoning, use, etc.): See Attached GENERAL DESCRIPTION EXTERIOR DESCRIPTION FOUNDATION BASEMENT INSULATION No. of Units 1 Foundation Conc. Blck. Slab None Area Sq.FI. 1092 Roof Cncld. ❑X No of Stories 2 Exterior Walls Metal Gam space None %Finished 41 % Ceiling Cncld. ❑X Type (Der/Art.) Detached Roof Surface Ai ph. Shn Basement Yes Ceiling AcTile Wags Cncld. ❑X Design (style) Two Story Gutters a Dwnspts. Both sung Punp Yes Worts Drywall Floar Cncld. X❑ Existing/Proposed Existing Window Type Gliders Dampness None Noted Floor Ca et None ❑ Age(Yrs.) 29 StormScreem Yes Settlement None Noted Outside Entry No unwnr 0 Effective A rs. 10 Manufactured House NO Infestation None Noted ❑ ROOMS Foyer Living Dining Kitchen Den F Pool ❑ -In i Baths Laun Other Atea S FI. Level I Area 1 1 1 concrete driveway and 3 season orch newer root areal Drivewa 5 brick front security Area 1 09Lovell Lere12 Condition of the improvements, depreciation (physical, functional, and external), repairs needed, quality of construction remodetingladdilions, etc.: See Attached ' .Iendum. .5 113 envlonmer�tal conditions (such as, but not limited to, hazardous wastes, toxic substances, etc.) present in the improvements, on the ails, in rve,:e iate vicinity , t the subject property: or the Close exposure to high power lines has a precepted cancer risk and even thou h studies 00% cony- ,:give Una market lace take Ulese fact into consideration. are wow Mx r..w to ow 3 1.75 VIT INTERIOR Mater alslCondlon HEATING KITCHEN EQUIP. C V +r aware AMENITIES reel rn gross Lwrn Area Floors Car eWin UHW /G Type FWA Refrigerate © ❑ Fieplace(s) /2 Q CAR STORAGE: None ❑ walls Dr all/AV Fuel Gas Range/Oven X ❑ ❑ Patio Concrete X Garage ��� TrirNFit'sh Oak/AV Avera a Disposal Stai F ❑ Deck Wood X Attached 3 G Bain Floor CeramiclGood Dsnwasher P ❑ e ❑X Porch 3 Season X❑ Detached Bath Wainscot Ceramic /Good Yes L Fan /Hood ❑X ❑ Fence Wood ❑X Bull Doors H01- COI /Av None Microwave © Heated ❑ Pool ❑ -In 4vera a Washer er P Finshed Additional features (special energy efficient items, etc.): Newer concrete driveway and 3 season orch newer root areal Drivewa 5 brick front security system. Condition of the improvements, depreciation (physical, functional, and external), repairs needed, quality of construction remodetingladdilions, etc.: See Attached ' .Iendum. r envlonmer�tal conditions (such as, but not limited to, hazardous wastes, toxic substances, etc.) present in the improvements, on the ails, in rve,:e iate vicinity , t the subject property: or the Close exposure to high power lines has a precepted cancer risk and even thou h studies 00% cony- ,:give Una market lace take Ulese fact into consideration. are wow Mx r..w to ow PAGE 1 OF 2 in.bmo..m,...ae..o o.�ov,.,.wwrui..r+.lwoltlr-�m Fw.w rxw row tour Sea 0 ,Valuation secTion UNIFORM RESIDENTIAL APPRAISAL REPORT FIIeNo. 000152 ESIIMATED SITE VALUE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . =3 55,000 Comments on Cost Approach (such as, source of cost estimate, ESTIMATED REPRODUCTION COST -NEW OF IMPROVEMENTS: COMPARABLE NO. 2 site value, square foot calculation and for HUD. VA and FmHA, the 6517 Limerick Drive Address Edina Dwelling 1,967 Sq. Ft. @ S 85.00 = S 167,195 5821 Hanson Road Edina estimated remaining economic life of the property): Inferior 3,000 Bsmt. 450 Sq. Ft. @ $-2-50-0 - 11,250 1 Mile The cost approach source is from Marshall Valuation S N/A Built- ins,C /A,Porch,FP,Patio = 33,000 S $234,900 Services.Note: External Depreciation of 10% for power - i.C.port 704 Sq. Ft. @ S 20,00 = 14,080 $ 91.97 o lines plus and additional 5% for railroad tracks and and stimated Cost New . • ....... . ... . .. = S 225,525 Inspection N/A additional 5 % for stigma of potential of high speed 70 Physical I Functional Extemal Est. Remaining Econ. Life: 60 commuter rail. ' Depedatim $30,878 1 1$38,929 - S 69,807 Depreciated Value of Improvements ,,,, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , = s 155,718 'As -is' Value of Site Improvements, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , = S 9,300 INDICATED VALUE BY COST APPROACH . • • • • • • • • • • = $ 220.000 3 Art. Garage 2 Car Garage 3,000 2 Car Garage Patio, Deck, ITEM I SUBJECT COMPARABLE NO. 1 COMPARABLE NO. 2 COMPARABLE NO.3 6517 Limerick Drive Address Edina 6521 Limerick Drive Edina 6516 Ridgeview Drive Edina 5821 Hanson Road Edina Ptoximay to Subject Inferior 3,000 Same Block 1 Block 1 Mile Sates Price S N/A S $220,000 $ $220,000 S $234,900 PricaGross Liv. Area S 0.00 0 $ 91.97 o S 136.22 D S 111.17 0 Data andlar Verification Sources Inspection N/A MLS Records/Drive -by Public Records MILS Records /Drive -by Public Records MLS Records/Drive -by Public Records VALUE ADJUSTMENTS DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION ..s AOMM DESCRIPTION_ -..1 -s A*.arwrs -DESCRIPTION-1-�)SAMMind - Sales or Financing Concessions 124 Days Conv. 28 Days Conv. 12 Days Conv. Date of Sale/l rime ! N/A 6/98 Closed 10 000 7/99 Closed 10/99 Closed Location Suburban/RR Suburban/RR Suburban/RR Suburban/Bus Iaudnadifee Fee Simple Fee Simple Fee Simple Fee Simple Site 14400 S .Ft. 14400 S .Ft. 14400 S .Ft. 11854 S .Ft. View Design and Appeal Of Power Lines Two Story Of Power Line Two Story Partial Power Lin : -5 000 Two Story Of Homes -10,000 Two Sto Quality of Coruauaon Average/Good Average/Good Average/Good Average/Good Age 29 Yrs 27 Yrs 29 Yrs 35 Yrs Condtion Average to Good Average to Good! Average to Good: Average to Good Above Grade Room Count 30 _Gross Living Area Basement a Finished Rooms Below Grade ram ;Boma ' amra ram : eema ' Data 8: 4: 2.25' -1,000 2,392 S .Ft. 12 800 Full 0 475 SF Fin. -300 term : so- ' Gee 8: 4: 2.25 ; 1,615 Sq.Ft. 10,600 Full 0 436 SF Fin. 100 Tctr Berra ' eaoa 7 3 2.25 ; 1,000 2,113 S .Ft. -4.400 FDIVVVO -2,000 344 SF Fin. 1,100 8: 4: 2.50 1,967 S .FL Full 450 SF Fin, Functional Utrt Average Average Average Average - Heating/Cooling Heating/Cooling -v Efficient nerm Gas FWA C /Air Standard E.E. Gas FVVA C /Air Standard E.E. Gas FWA C /Air Standard E.E. Gas FWA C/Air ; Standard E.E. lCar 3 Art. Garage 2 Car Garage 3,000 2 Car Garage Patio, Deck, POfch,Pabo,Dk SunRm,Dk 1,000 Porch -e a s , etc 2 Fire laces 2 Fireplace 2 Fireplace Fence Pod eta Fen,Landsca a Inferior 3,000 Inferior Hi h s eed rail Stud Prior to stud 10 000 Prior to stud Net Ad total Adjusted Sales Price Gross: 18.7% Gross: 15.3% d Co rabte Net: -3.2% S 212,900 Net: 1.7% i Comments on Sales Comparison (including the subject property's compatibility to the neighborhood, etc. ): S very limited market it was necessary to exceed the recommended guidelines of 1 year a neighborhood however It was believed these three comparables used are the best enm 2,000 Deck 2 Fireplace 3,000 VVP 0,000 Prior to stud 3 700 + X - Gross: 16.4% 3,700 1 Net: -6.1 % Iched Addendum. Not out side of the subject �s available with most 5 2 -10 14 to a �• r UMFARABLE NO. 2 Date, Price and Data None reported None reported None reported COMPARABLE NO. 3 None reported Soumetuporsales Per PIN Point Per PIN Point Per PIN Point Per PIN Point wthn�da appraisal Tax Service Tax Service Tax Service Tax Service Analysis of any anent agreement of sale, option, or listing of the subject property and analysis of any prior sales of subject and Prior sales or listings of the subject roe ha tPr over the last 12 months or 1 year if an a been n ind ated above. ore ales of th cum ambles over the last 12 months or 1 Year if an have been indicated above. INDICATED VALUE BY SALES COMPARISON APPROACH .. ............................... .........S 220.0 INDICATED VALUE BY INCOME APPROACH If icable Estimated Market Rent S N/A Mb. x cross Rent Mull.' • NZA = S . N This appraisal is QX 'as made e' sunjeo to the repairs, allwatiorrs, ilspedions a captions listed below completion Cordi orsdAppraisal: The fees paid by the buyer and/or seller to obtain or assume financing va ue for this the appraised property. property not affect the of Final Reconciliation: A lack of comparable rental sales precluded a further analysis of the Income supportive of the final value eshmate ISJ- thor °�� Approach The Cost Approach was The purpose of this appraisal is to estimate the market value of the real property that is the subject of this report, based on the above conditions and the eertlicaticM eonlilgent and limiting conditions, and market value definition that are slated in the attached Freddie Mac Form <3911 annis Mae Form 10048 (Revised IBM I (WE) ESTIMATE THE MARKET VALUE, AS DEFINED, OF THE REAL PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS RFPORT,ASOF 3/10/2000 I WHICH IS THE D7A OF INSPECTION AND THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS REPORT) TO BE S 220,000 Ao °RAISER• SUPERVISORY APPRAISER (ONLY IF REQUIRED): 1s Signature ;r g ryP.Smith RAq ❑Dd ❑DdNot Date Dale Report Signed 3110/2000 Name Repot Signed Inspect Property D State Certification Y 4002205 Slate MN State Certification If Or Stale License C 4002205 State MN Or State License 0 State .rna<lamro aw esea ea State a PAGE 2OF2 opertyAppraiser Tbbm.,.> .fix ...wc. PdF*.,pw f=)Z. nr F.m Fam,our dw Russell Smith Associates Inc. ADDENDUM Borrower:_ Robert J Malby File No.: 0001_5_2 Properly Address _6517 Limerick Drive_ Case No.: _City:_Edina State MN zip: 55439 Lender: Robert J Malby ASSESSED TAX VALUE: The assessor's opinion of market value for the 2000 year is $230,000, the projected 2001 taxed assessor's value is $249,500. COST APPROACH: Replacement costs rather than reproduction costs were used for determining the base rates and itemized cost components. In some instances, this may lessen the need for incurable functional obsolescence being applied in the depreciation section. SALES COMPARISON COMMENTS: Post adjustment, the comparable sales strongly support the conclusion of value.shese_comparables.are believed to be the best currently available. The sales bracketed the subject, providing a balanced analysis of the subject's value. Comparable sales were all located within the defined neighborhood. Their sales were analyzed. The adjustments were based on paired sales analysis wherever possible. Other adjustments were based on extraction or my experience of market reactions observed in this neighborhood. The square foot adjustrttent was based on $35.00 per sq. ft. for differences in Gross Living Area with no adjustments under 100 sq. ft. The finished basement area is adjusted $10.00 per sq. ft.with no adjustments under 100 sq. ft.. Bathrooms are adjusted at $500.00 per fixture. Rooms are adjusted at $1000.00 per room. Time Adjustments All sales used in the analysis were closed transactions within a one year time span of the appraisal date except for comparable #1 which was the best comparable due to the impact of the power lines and the railroad tracks. The market conditions in the area have remained stable or increasing over the last year with no significant fluctuations being noted, except a 4% appreciation factor was applied to comparable #1 due to the longer time period from the date of sale. OMISSION OF THE INCOME APPROACH: I considered the income approach for this analysis. Nonetheless, the lack of reliable rental data in the subject's market area, made the income approach inappropriate for this appraisal. Single family homes are typically not purchased for investment purposes in the subject's neighborhood. Site Comments The subject property has a large easement over the rear of the property for High voltage power transmission lines and the property backs up to a railroad tracks which has a pending feasibility study for expansion to high speed commuter rail. (See attached High Speed Commuter Rail Feasibility Study dated 2 -16 -200, with notes on adverse affect on property values and Sun News paper article dated 3/15/2000 on Commuter railroad study) Condition of Improvements The overall condition of the improvements appears average /good. I based accrued depreciation (age -life method) on the subject's observed condition. External Depreciation for high power lines and current railroad tracks along with the stigma of the potential for high speed commuter rail has created a major cloud on the overall marketability of this property. Disclosure of the above facts has decreased both the value and the potential market of buyers for this home. APPRAISAL DEVELOPMENT AND REPORTING PROCESS: At the request of the Owner, I conducted a Complete Appraisal intended to comply with Standard 1 of the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice ( USPAP). No departures from Standard 1 were invoked. The report itself is intended to meet the requirements of a Summary Appraisal Report as outlined in Standards Rule 2 -2(b) of USPAP. The above terms and requirements are relevant to new changes in USPAP that became effective as of July 1, 1994. The appraisal still meets all prior guidelines normally required for a FNMA/FHLMC appraisal. The report presents summary discussions of the data, reasoning, and analyses that were used in the appraisal process to develop the appraiser's opinion of value. Supporting documentation that is not provided with the report concerning the data, reasoning, and analyses is retained in the appraiser's file. The depth of the discussion contained in the report is specific to the needs of the client and for the intended use stated in the report. The appraiser is not responsible for unauthorized use of the report. SCOPE OF THE APPRAISAL: The purpose of the appraisal is to estimate market value, as defined, for use in a federally - related mortgage an. This scope of the appraisal is intended to summarize the extent of the process used to collect, confirm, Addendum Page 1 or 3 ADDENDUM Ooiiowef:_Roben J Malby File No.: — 000152 Progeny Address 6517 LIm_ Brick Drive C_ ase_N0.: _Cdy:_Ed_ina sta_te__MN Zip: 55439 Lender: Robert J Malby and communicate data that is the property on the effective date indicated in the appraisal. Market data on comparable sales was attained from the Multiple Listing Service unless noted otherwise. Sale prices and closing dates were verified through PINpoint (Processing Information Network), or county records, or with listing brokers. The land value estimate for the subject site was based on one or more of the following methods: comparable land sales, extraction, or the allocation method. Construction rates in the cost approach were derived from the Marshall & Swift Residential Cost Handbook which is updated quarterly. All appropriate valuation methods were considered, analyzed, and reconciled, and are the basis for my final opinion of value. Exceptions, if any, are discussed in the supplement. I believe my analysis of the subject's value was thorough and complete, but the appraisal is by no means an exhaustive market study of the property. As previously noted, this Complete Appraisal /Summary Report is intended to meet FNMA appraisal guidelines as well as the requirements of USPAP. Addendum Page 2 of 3 ADDENDUM _Borrower:_Roben J Malby File_No.: 00.0_15.2 _Property Address_6517 Limerick Drive Case No.: Cily:_Edina - -_ - -_ State MN - - -_ Zip: 55439 Lender: Robert J Malby Comments on the Inspection Process My interior and exterior inspection of a typical residence takes approximately one hour to complete. My inspection is for valuation purposes only and is not intended for code compliance. Please be aware that I did not inspect unfinished attic areas nor any foundation crawl space, if such areas required access through scuttle doors or were otherwise not readily accessible. My inspection was limited to areas which would be considered part of the gross building area (GBA). In regards to insulation, please be aware that I did not verify the presence, nor the amount of insulation in the ceiling or walls unless the insulation was readily visible from the gross building area. It is assumed in this report that the building structure, including the roof, is in adequate repair and that mechanical systems such as heating, plumbing, electrical, etc., are in an operational state of physical repair and meet city code requirements. It is also assumed that no problems created by the existence of asbestos, lead- paint, or other toxic materials, where any major removal or correction costs would be involved, are experienced in the property. DATA SOURCES: This appraiser utilized the current Regional Multiple Listing Service (MLS) and PIN Point Service provided by Moore Data Management Services. These systems access public tax and assessor records along with the realtors listings and sales data base. All closed sales which are not yet recorded in the public records were verified by the listing realtor. No Conflicts: Robert J Malby is an independent accountant for the corporate books of Russell Smith Associates, Inc. I Gregory P. Smith do not have personally or direct business contact with Mr. Malby. STATE LICENSE AND FEDERAL CERTIFICATION: 3regory P. Smith is licensed under the State of Minnesota at the level of Certified Residential Real Property {ppraiser, State Identification Number 4002205. Mr. Smith also holds a Residential Accredited Appraiser Designation from the National Association of Realtors. Matthew N. Smith has assisted Gregory P. Smith in the inspection and completion of this report. Mr. Smith is licensed under the State of Minnesota at the level of Real Real Estate Appraiser, State Identification Number 20132069. Addendum Pope 3 of 3 SKETCH ADDENDUM File No. 000152 Borrower Robert J Malby property Address - 6517 Limerick Drive ly Edina _. _ _ _ County Hennepin State MN_ Zip Code 55439 :ndeilCiient Robert J Malby Address 6517 Limerick Drive, Edina, MN 55439 22' 12'IFiP Family Room 12' 32' 26' 5' 20' 4' Kitchen Dining 8' Baf.h 4' Liuing Room 15' Foyer 5' 32' 32' 3/4 Bath Bedroom Bedroom Bath Bedroom Bedroom 32' 26' SKETCH CALCULATIONS Living Area First Floor Al 11.0 x 1.0 = 11.0 A2 32.0 x 4.0 = 128.0 A3 0.5(52.0 • 56.0)x1.0 - 54.0 A4 56.0 x 7.0 = 392.0 AS 68.0 x 1.0 = 68.0 A6 0.5(68.0 • 64.034.0 = 66.0 A7 64.0 x 15.0 = 960.0 AB 32.0 x 5.0 = 160.0 Attached Garage -704.0 1135.0 Second Floor A10 : 32.0 x 26.0 = 832.0 532.0 Total Living Area 1967.0 I Garage Area Attached Garage R11 : 32.0 x 22.0 = 704.0 704.0 Total Garage Area 704.0 WnSkerrh by Jamnin Sof r we MUL I I- PURPUSE SUPPLEMENTAL ADDENDUM FOR FEDERALLY RELATED TRANSACTIONS (FIRREA) 000152 BoiroweriClient Robert J Malby Property Addiese 6517 Limerick Drive Edina County Hennepin State MN Zip Code 55439 Lender Robert J Malby This Multi- Purpose Supplemental Addendum for Federally Related Transactions was designed to provide the appraiser with a con- venient way to comply with the current appraisal standards and requirements of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), the Office of the Comptroller of Currency (OCC), The Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS), the Resolution Trust Corporation (RTC) and the Federal Reserve. This Multi- Purpose Supplemental Addendum Is for use with any appraisal. Only those statements which have been checked by the appraiser apply to the property being appraised. X PURPOSE 8 FUNCTION OF APPRAISAL The purpose of the appraisal is to estimate the market value of the subject properly as defined herein. The function of the appraisal Is to assist the above -named Lender in evaluating the subject property tot lending purposes. this is a federally related transaction. X EXTENT OF APPRAISAL PROCESS — - -71-The appraisal is based:on .the -In forma by Hie.a p- - - - PP_ y pprelser Irom ublic records, other Idenlllied sources, Inspection subject pruperty and neighborhood, and selection of compatabte sales within the subject morkel area. The original source of the com- parables is shuwn in the Data Source section of the market grid along with the source Of confirmation, it available. The original source is presented lust. the sources and dale are considered reliable. when conflicting information was provided, the source deemed most reliable has been used. Data believed to be unreliable was not included in the report nor used as a basis for the value conclusion. M The Reproduction Cost is based on Marshall Valuation Service supplemented by the appraiser's knowledge of Ina local inarkel. FX Physical depreciation is based on the estimated effective age of the subject properly. Functional and/or external depreciation, If present, is specilically addressed in the appraisal report or other addenda. In estimating the site value, the appraiser has retied on pelsunal knuwiedge,ul the local market. this knowledge is based on prior and /or current analysis of site sales and /or abstraction of site values from sales of improved properties. OThe subject properly is,locafed in an area of'pfimerily owner- occupied single family residences and The Income Approach Is not eonsl- aerea lu be meaningful. For Inis reason, the Incume Approach was not used. OThe Estimated Market Rent and Gross Rent Multiplier utilized in the Income Approach are based on the appraiser's knowledge of the subject market area. the rental knuwleuge is based on prim and/or current rental rote surveys of residential properties. The Grose Rent Multiplier is based on prior and/or current analysis ut prices and market rates for residential properties. For income producing properties, actual rents, vacancies and expenses have been reported and analyzed. They have been used to pro- Iecl future rents, vacancies and expenses. X SUBJECT PROPERTY OFFERING INFORMATION According to the Regional Multiple Listing Service the subject i properly; % has not been offered for sale or the past 12 months or 1 years. Is currently offered for sale for S W23 offered for sate within the past months or years. Ohering irrtomtation was considered In the final reconciliation of value. Onering infumraliun was not considered in the final reconciliation of value. Offering inlurinatiun was not available. The reasons for unavailability and the steps taken by the appraiser are explained later In this addendum. X SALES HISTORY OF SUBJECT PROPERTY According to public records the subject property; X has not transferred in the peel 12 monins or 1 years. has transferred in the past months or years. All prior sales which have occurred in the pest months or Years are listed below end a,.v. 4.01 r.. rr.e appraised value, either in the body of the report or in the addenda Date Sales Price Document Seller Buyer X FEMA FLOOD HAZARD DATA Subject property Is not located In a FEMA Special Flood Hazard Area. Subject properly is located in a FEMA Special Flood Hazard Area IC 270160 5 -1 -80 Edina I The community does not participate In the National Flood Insurance Program. The cummunily does participate in the National Fluod Insurance Program. It is covered by a regular program. . II is covered by an emeraenev r rnomm, FW.70111 Forms a Worms Inc, 715 rvhitney Ave. New NaYen, CT 00511 All Rights Reserved o.c.me. Im ne ....w. ;I vrn r...mo... a •u Owwyawin a.perv..o.nYm door awn/ SUMMARY REPORT 000152 X CURRENT SALES CONTRACT R x The subject property is currently not under contract. The con lra cl andlor escrow instructions were not a v a I table for rev low. The unavailability of the contract is explained later in the addand' ' ection. 01 he cuntracl andlor escrow instructions were reviewed. The following summarizes the contract: Contract Data Amendment Date Contract Price Seller DX The contract indicated that personal properly was not Included in the sale. T he contract indicated that personal property was Included. 11 consisted of Estimated contributory value Is $ X Personal property was not Included in The final value estimate. Personal property waa Included in the final value estimate. The contract indicated no financing concessions or other Incentives. The contract indicated the following concessions or Incentives: DIf concessions or incentives exist, the co"Iparables were checked lot similar concessions and appropriate adjustments were made, 11 applicable, so that the final value conclusion is in compliance with the Markel Value defined herein. x MARKET OVERVIEW Include an explanation of current market conditions and trends. 6 -12 months is considered a reasonable marketing period for the subject property based on huh power lines, railroad tracks and high speed commuter study. X ADDITIONAL CERTIFICATION The Appraiser certifies and agrees that: (1) Their analyses, opinions and conclusions were developed, and this report was prepared, in conformity with the Uniform Standards of Prulessiunal Appraisal Practice (' USPAP'), and in accordance with the regulations developed by the Leader's Federal Regulatory Agency as required by FIRREA, except that the Departure Provisions of the USPAP do not apply. - (2) Their compensation Is not contingent upon the reporting of predetermined value or direction In value that favors the cause of the client, the amount of the value estimate, the attainment of a stipulated result, OF the occurrence of a subsequent event. (3) this appraisal assignment was not based on the requested minimum valuation, a specific valuation, or the approval of a loan. X ADDITIONAL (ENVIRONMENTAL) LIMITING CONDITIONS The value estimated is based on the assumption that the property is not negatively affected by the existence of hazardous substances of detrimenlal environmental conditions unless ulherwise slated in this report. The appraiser is not an expert in the identification of hazardous substances or dehimenial enviruumenlal conditions. The appraiser's routine inspeclion of and inquiries about the subject property Mir not develop any information that indicated any apparent significant hazardous substances or detrimental environmental cundilions which would affect the properly neyatively unless ulherwise staled in this report. It is possible that tests and inspections made by a qualified hazardous substance and emir o n mental expert would reveal the existence of hazardous substances or detrimental enrkonmeolal cuudilions on or around the properly that would negatively affect its value. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS X APPRAISER'S S NATURE & LICENSE /CERTIFICATION Appraiser's Signature Effective Date 3/1012000 Date Prepared 3/10/2000 Appraiser's Name (print egoiy P. Smith, RAA Phone t (_612 ) 545 -0404 Slate MN X license Residential Certification Cerliticelion f 4002205 Tax ID i 41- 1242607 CO- SIGNING APPRAISER'S CERTIFICATION OThe cu- signing appraiser has personally Inspected The subject both inside property, and out, and has made an exterior Inspection of all cumParabre sales listed in the report. The report was prepared by the appraiser under direct supervision of the co- signing appraiser. The cu- siyntny appraiser accepts responsibilily lot The contents of the report including the value conclusions and the limiting condi- liuns, and confirms that the certifications apply fully to the co- signing appraiser The co- signing appraiser has not personally Inspected the interior of the subject property and: has not Inspected The exterior of the subject properly and all comparable sales listed in the report. has Inspected the exterior of the subject property and all comparable sales listed in the report. The report was prepared by the appraiser under direct supervision of The co- signing appraiser. The co- signing appraiser accepts respuusibilily for the contents of the report, including the value conclusions and the limiting conditions, and confirms that the certifications apply fully to the co- signing appraiser with the exception of the certification regarding physical inspections. TAe above describes a level of inspection performed by the co- signing appraiser. EDT he co- signing appraiser's level of inspection, involvement in The appraisal process and certification addenda section of this appraisal. are covered elsewhere in the CO- SIGNING APPRAISER'S SIGNATURE & LICENSE /CERTIFICATION Appraiser's Signature DTrainee D Review D Other Appraiser's Name (print) SS / State DLicense D Cerlilied Residential D Certification f 4, Tom wumxw tw3 ms wm nyoown •a p.mu•n on m. xa Onw •••••• ••' wan wn nranu nrarMree w.m e.rer.••,r� soul r»am Fie No. 000152 DEFINITION OF MARKET VALUE: The most probable price which a property should bring in a competitive and open market under all conditions requisite to a fair sale, the buyer and seller, each acting prudently, knowledgeably and assuming the price is not affected by undue stimulus. Implicit in this definition is the consummation of a sale as of a specified date and the passing of title from seller to buyer under conditions whereby: (1) buyer and seller are typically motivated; (2) both parties are well informed or well advised, and each acting in what he considers his own best interest; (3) a reasonable time is allowed for exposure in the open market; (4) payment is made in terms of cash in U.S. dollars or in terms of financial arrangements comparable thereto; and (5) the price represents the normal consideration for the property sold unaffected by special or creative financing or sales concessions' granted by anyone associated with the sale. 'Adjustments to the comperables must be made for special or creative financing or sales concessions. No adjustments are necessary for those costs which are normally paid by sellers as a result of tradition or law in a market area; these costs are readily identifiable since the seller pays these costs in virtually all sales transactions. Special or creative financing adjustments can be made to the comparable property by comparisons to financing terms offered by a third party institutional lender that is not already involved in the property or transaction. Any adjustment should not be calculated on a mechanical dollar for dollar cost of the financing or concession but the dollar amount of any adjustment should approximate the market's reaction to the financing or concessions based on the Appraiser's judgment. STATEMENT OF LIMITING CONDITIONS AND APPRAISER'S CERTIFICATION CONTINGENT AND LIMITING CONDITIONS: The appraiser's certification that appears In the appraisal report is subject to the following conditions: 1. The appraiser will not be responsible for matters of a legal nature that affect either the property being appraised or the title to it. The appraiser assumes that the title is good and marketable and, therefore, will not render any opinions about the title. The property is appraised on the basis of it being under responsible ownership. 2. The appraiser has provided a sketch in the appraisal report to show approximate dimensions of the improvements and the sketch is included only to assist the reader of the report in visualizing the property and understanding the appraiser's determination of its size. 3. The appraiser has examined the available flood maps that are provided by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (or other data sources) and has noted in the appraisal report whether the subject site is located in an identified Special Flood Hazard Area. Because the appraiser is not a surveyor, he or she makes no guarantees, express or implied, regarding this determination. 4. The appraiser will not give testimony or appear in court because he or she made an appraisal of the property in question, unless specific arrangements to do so have been made beforehand. 5. The appraiser has estimated the value of the land in the cost approach at its highest and best use and the improvements at their contributory value. These separate valuations of the land and improvements must not be used in conjunction with any other appraisal and are invalid if they are so used. 6. The appraiser has noted in the appraisal report any adverse conditions (such as, needed repairs, depreciation, the presence of hazardous wastes, toxic substances, etc. ) observed during the inspection of the subject property or that he or she became aware of during the normal research involved in performing the appraisal. Unless otherwise stated in the appraisal report, the appraiser has no knowledge of any hidden or unapparent conditions of the property or adverse environmental conditions (including the presence of hazardous wastes, toxic substances, etc. ) that would make the property more or less valuable, and has assumed [hat there are no such conditions and makes no guarantees or warranties, express or implied, regarding the condition of the property. The appraiser will not be responsible for any such conditions that do exist or for any engineering or testing that might be required to discover whether such conditions exist. Because the appraiser is not an expert in the field of environmental hazards, the appraisal report must not be considered as an environmental assessment of the property. 7. The appraiser obtained the information, estimates, and opinions that were expressed in the appraisal report from sources that he or she considers to be reliable and believes them to be true and correct. The appraiser does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of such items that were furnished by other parties. 8. The appraiser will not disclose the contents of the appraisal report except as provided for in the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Radice. 9. The appraiser has based his or her appraisal report and valuation conclusion for an appraisal that is subject to satisfactory completion, repairs, or alterations on the assumption that completion of the improvements will be performed in a workmanlike manner. 10. The appraiser must provide his or her prior written consent before the lertderlclient specified in the appraisal report can distribute the appraisal report (including conclusions about the property value, the appraiser's identity and professional designations, and references to any professional appraisal organizations or the firm with which the appraiser is associated ) to anyone other than the borrower; the mortgagee or its successors and assigns; the mortgage insurer; consultants; professional appraisal organizations; any state or federally approved financial institution; or any department, agency, or instrumentality of the United States or any state or the District of Columbia; except that the lendericlient may distribute the property description section of the report only to data collection or reporting service(s) without having to obtain the appraiser's prior written consent. The appraiser's written consent and approval must also be obtained before the appraisal can be conveyed by anyone to the public through advertising, public relations, news, sales, or other media. Freddie Mac Form 439 6 -93 Page 1 of 2 Fannie Mae Form 1004B 6 -93 Fie No. 000152 APPRAISERS CERTIFICATION: The Appraiser certifies and agrees that: 1. 1 have researched the subject market area and have selected a minimum of three recent sales of properties most similar and proximate to the subject property for consideration in the sales comparison analysis and have made a dollar adjustment when appropriate to reflect the market reaction to those items of significant variation. 11 a significant item in a comparable property is superior to , or more favorable than, the subject property, I have made a negative adjustment to reduce the adjusted sales price of the comparable and, if a significant item in a comparable property is inferior to, or less favorable than the subject property, I nave mane a positive adjustment to increase the adjusted sales price of the comparable. 2. 1 have taken into consideration the factors that have an impact on value in my development of the estimate of market value in the appraisal report. I have not knowingly withheld any significant information from the appraisal report and I believe, to the best of my knowledge, that all statements and information in the appraisal report are true and correct. 3. 1 stated in the appraisal report only my own personal, unbiased, and professional analysis, opinions, and conclusions, which are subject only to the contingent and limiting conditions specified in this form. 4. f have no present or prospective interest in the property that is the subject to this report, and I have no present or prospective personal interest or bias with respect to the participants in the transaction. I did not base, either partially or completely, my analysis and /or the estimate of market value in the appraisal report on the race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin of either the prospective owners or occupants of the subject property or of the present owners or occupants of the properties in the vicinity of the subject property. 5. 1 have no present or contemplated future interest in the subject property, and neither my current or future employment nor my compensation for performing this appraisal is contingent on the appraised value of the property. 6. 1 was not required to report a predetermined value or direction in value that favors the cause of the client or any related party, the amount of the value estimate, the attainment of a specific result, or the occurrence of a subsequent event in order to receive my compensation and /or employment for performing the appraisal. I did not base the appraisal report on a requested minimum valuation, a specific valuation, or the need to approve a specific mortgage loan. 7. 1 performed this appraisal in conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice that were adopted and promulgated by the Appraisal Standards Board of The Appraisal Foundation and that were in place as of the effective date of this appraisal, with the exception of the departure provision of those Standards, which does not apply. I acknowledge that an estimate of a reasonable time for exposure in the open market is a condition in the definition of market value and the estimate I developed is consistent with the marketing time noted in the neighborhood section of this report, unless I have otherwise stated in the reconciliation section. 8. 1 have personally inspected the interior and exterior areas of the subject property and the exterior of all properties listed as comparables in the appraisal report. I further certify that I have noted any apparent or known adverse conditions in the subject improvements, on the subject site, or on any site within the immediate vicinity of the subject property of which I am aware and have made adjustments for these adverse conditions in my analysis of the property value to the extent that I had market evidence to support them. I have also commented about the effect of the adverse conditions on the marketability of the subject property. 9. 1 personally prepared all conclusions and opinions about the real estate that were set forth in the appraisal report. If I relied on significant professional assistance from any individual or individuals in the performance of the appraisal or the preparation of the appraisal report, I have named such individual(s) and disclosed the specific tasks performed by them in the reconciliation section of this appraisal report. I certify that any individual so named is qualified to perform the tasks. I have not authorized anyone to make a change to any item in the report; therefore, 6 an unauthorized change is made to the appraisal report, I will take no responsibility for it. SUPERVISORY APPRAISER'S CERTIFICATION: If a supervisory appraiser signed the appraisal report, he or she certifies and agrees that: I directly supervise the appraiser who prepared the appraisal report, have reviewed the appraisal report, agree with the statements and conclusions of the appraiser, agree to be bound by the appraiser's certifications numbered 4 through 7 above, and am taking full responsibility for the appraisal and the appraisal report. ADDRESS OF PROPERTY APPRAISED: 6517 Limerick Drive Edina MN 55439 APPRAISER: SUPERVISORY APPRAISER (only If required) Signature: Name: Gre o P. Smith RAA Date Signed: 3/10/2000 State Certification p: 4002205 or State License tr: 4002205 State: MN Expiration Date of Certification or License: August 31, 2000 Signature: Name: Date Signed: State Certification M or State License p: State: Expiration Date of Certification or License ❑ Did ❑ Did Not Inspect Property Certified Residential Real Property Appraiser Freddie Mac Form 439 6 -93 Page 2 of 2 Fannie Mae Form 1004B 6 -93 � � 5 STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 133 Eaa Seventh St St_ Paul. MN 55101 (612) 2966319 APPRAISER LICENSE EDWX02205 CFRT RE.SL REAL PROP Emv,s 8/31/2000 30 Hri CE duc by 8/31/2000 OREOORY P SMITH 1517 PENNSYLVANIA AVE N OOLDEN VALLEY. MN 55427.0000 STATE OF MN DEPT. OF COMMERCE 133 Eaa Seventh St. St Paul, MN 55101 z k (612) 296-6319 yy APPRAISER LICENSE ID�4002205 CERT RESL REAL. PROP E*ires: 8131 /2000 30 Hrs CE due by 8/31/2000 OREOORY P 3MM 1517 PENNSYLVANIA AVE N OOLDEN VAL.L.EY, MN 55427.0000 PReFL SSIONALOUAL1FlCAno H9.of.oREGoity.P.. s1t1 m R AA. C"fied ResWential Real Property Appraiser MN Lkons• 84002205 Federal 1.0. 041.1242607 MEMM-8BF, a apa 1 l • Residential Acereaed Appraiser Designation • National Association of Realtors • Greater Minneapols Board of Realtors EDLICAIM • Mankato Slate University B.S. Business Administration (December 1973) • Minneapolis Area Association of Realtors Real Estate Professionalism (5195) • ProSource Educational Services, Inc. USPAP Standards for the Aulornated Appraiser (7198) Home Inspections: The Basks (Me) Ins Ifl Outs of Limited Scope Appralsals (7196) Robo-Appralsef '9e (W) How to Perform Employee Relocation Council (ERC) Appraisals (6196) FHA Appraisal Within HUD Guide (11194) How to Appraise the Tough Ones (9193) How to Prepare the New U.R.A.R. (7193) Writing the NsrnOve Appraisal (9192) Appraisal Guide to Residential Construction (11191) • American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers Standards of Professional Practice -Part A (3194) Standards of Professional PracOMPart B (3194) Americans With Disabllilles Act. (5192) Standards of Prolesslo(W Precut* (1168) Real Estate Appraisal PMcaples (7186) Residential Valuation (7168) • Society of Real Estate Appraisers Anatomy of a Home Inspection (2199) Appraiser /Underwriter 'Town Hart Meeting• (11198) The Appraiser's Guide to the URAR (4187) *Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way and Surveys Prolessional Conlerence (09196) • Minnesota Banking Association. Various soninars FXPESI NCE * Residential Appraisal Manager Russell Smith AssoGlales, Inc. June 1986 - Present a Vice President and Branch Manager Rothschild Financial Corporation March 1991- February 1989 • Residential Mortgage Loan Consultant David C. eau Investment Company February 1973 - Marcel 1981 * Expen court witness r r IfiNT4 •AeC Ivsonp•g. •fume. Hone Loan 9Arno6W sl Mortgage Co. •Appabaal Enhencamenl •Bonk of A nonce Mtg. •Mat Rate hsofV oge • C r.corD Mwtp ep e ,iC.nl.a Born. Equity •Chia• Ma hanan Mtg. eO.E. Cepwlaeorlgage eGMAC Mortgage *Gioontre* financial eti,AC Mortgage Cory. •l-enders Flnandal Svcs. •LenOer 3ervlcaa. InC. -Mouth Lynch Capital •Mortgage L va Financial •New Century Mtg. Corp. ePrklwaCUrce financial oprudentlal Savings Bank eSupereor Savings Bank e The Associates •The Money Stole *Town a Country Creoil et1S Property 8 Appraisal •Vakueon Ad"nisualors evvestem Capitol Monpage MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY HELD AT CITY HALL APRIL 4, 2000 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly and Chair Maetzold. CONSENT AGENDA APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Johnson and seconded by Commissioner Hovland approving the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Agenda as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FOR MARCH 21 2000 APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Johnson and seconded by Commissioner Hovland approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority for March 21, 2000. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR 50TH & FRANCE RAMP IMPROVEMENTS Motion made by Commissioner Johnson and seconded by Commissioner Hovland for award of bid for 50th and France ramp facility expansion and restoration to recommended low bidder Knutson Construction Services, as follows: P-4a North Ramp at $1,840,000.00; P -1c South Ramp Waste Management at $42,000.00; and P -21 Ramp Restoration at $325,000.00 partial bid. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. CLAIMS PAID Motion made by Commissioner Hovland approving the Check Register dated March 29, 2000, and consisting of one page totaling. $28,383.07. Commissioner Faust seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold Motion carried. There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, Chair Maetzold declared the meeting adjourned at 7:02 P.M. Executive Director COUNCIL CHECK k—�ISTER 12- APR -2000 (, 2) page 1 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR - DESCRIPTION - - - -- _INVOICE - ---------- PROGRAM--- - - - - -- OBJECT-- - - - -PO -NUM - - - - -- - - - -- --------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------- 13538 04/18/00 - - - - -- $5,636.71 -------- - BRW INC. - - - -- ARCHITECT FEES 267 -0819 CENTENNIAL LAK PRO FEE ARCH /E 04/18/00 $29,520.29 BRW INC. ARCHITECT FEES 515 -0013 CENTENNIAL LAK PRO FEE ARCH /E 04/18/00 $246.20 BRW INC. ARCHITECT FEES 267 -0868 CENTENNIAL LAX PRO FEE ARCH /E 04/18/00 $5,209.65 BRW INC. ARCHITECT FEES 515 -0019 CENTENNIAL LAK PRO FEE ARCH /E *> $40,612.85* 13539 04/18/00 $41,496.00 THOMAS & SONS CONSTRUCTI PARTIAL PAYMENT #1 04/18 CENTENNIAL LAK PARKS 04/18/00 $8,660.49 THOMAS & SONS CONSTRUCTI PARTIAL PAYMENT #3- 041800 CENTENNIAL LAK PARKS < *> $50,156.49* $90,769.34* COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY 12- APR -2000 (14:03) page _1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ FUND # 01 HOUSING & REDEVELOP AUTHOR $90,769.34 $90,769.34* o e v �y 0.1 Porol 1888 To: EDINA HRA From: DEBRA MANGEN CITY CLERK Date: APRIL 18, 2000 Subject: SIGNATORY RESOLUTION EXCEL BANK Recommendation: REPORT /RECOMMENDATION Agenda Item # Consent Information Only ❑ HRA III. Mgr. Recommends ® To HRA ❑ To Council Action ❑ Motion ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Adopt a Signatory Resolution authorizing the Mayor, Manager and Treasurer of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority to transact all banking business. Info /Background: The Housing and Redevelopment Authority should adopt a Signatory Resolution authorizing the person holding office as Mayor and the Manager and Treasurer of the City to act for the Housing and. Redevelopment Authority in transacting banking business with the named bank. A copy of the recommended Resolution is attached for review. RESOLUTION NO. 2000 -01 EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SIGNATORY RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED that persons holding office as Mayor, Manager and Treasurer of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority, be, and they hereby are authorized to act for this municipality in the transaction of any banking business with Excel Bank (formerly known as Americana State Bank of Edina), (hereinafter referred to as the "Bank ") from time to time and until written notice to the Bank to the contrary, to sign checks against said accounts, which checks will be signed by the Mayor, Manager and City Treasurer. The Bank is hereby authorized and directed to honor and pay any checks against such account if signed as above described, whether or not said check is payable to the order of, or deposited to the credit of, the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority. ADOPTED this 18th day of April, 2000: Attest: City Clerk Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority at its Regular Meeting of April 18, 2000, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 19`h day of April, 2000. City Clerk '00 SIGNATORY RESOLUTION o ��` rottrox�'� • �aee To: EDINA HRA From: DEBRA MANGEN CITY CLERK Date: APRIL 18, 2000 Subject: FACSIMILE SIGNATURES RESOLUTION Recommendation: REPORT /RECOMMENDATION Agenda Item # HRA III. Consent Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends � To HRA ❑ To Council Action ❑ Motion a® Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Adopt a Resolution authorizing the use of facsimile signatures by public officials of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority. Info /Background: The Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority should adopt a Resolution authorizing the use of facsimile signatures by the Mayor, Manager and Treasurer on checks, drafts, warrants, vouchers, etc., or other orders by public funds deposited with Excel bank. A,copy of the recommended Resolution is attached for your review. HRA RESOLUTION NO. 2000 -02 EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AUTHORIZING USE OF FACSIMILE SIGNATURES BY PUBLIC OFFICIALS RESOLVED that the use of facsimile signatures by the following named persons: DENNIS F. MAETZOLD - Mayor GORDON L. HUGHES - City Manager JOHN WALLIN - Treasurer on checks, drafts, warrants, warrant- checks, vouchers or other orders of public funds deposited in Excel Bank (formerly known as Americana State Bank of Edina), be and hereby is approved, -- and._that.above_said_persons may-authorize-said depository banks to honor any such instrument bearing their facsimile signature in such form as they may designate and to charge the same to the account in said depository bank upon which drawn as fully as though it bore their manually written signature and that instruments so honored shall be wholly operative and binding in favor of said depository bank although such facsimile signature shall have been affixed without their authority. ADOPTED this 1811 day of April, 2000. Attest: City Clerk Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority at its Regular Meeting of April 18, 2000, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 191h day of April, 2000. City Clerk '00 RR FACSIMILE SIGNATURESOW .i MINUTES, OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL APRIL 4, 2000 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, and Mayor Maetzold. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Johnson and seconded by Member Hovland approving the Council Consent Agenda as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF MARCH 21 2000 APPROVED Motion made by Member Johnson and seconded by Member Hovland approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of March 21, 2000. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. RESOLUTION 2000 -37 ADOPTED VACATING UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENTS AND A PORTION OF WEST 78TH STREET (BRAEWOOD PARK PT TI Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Presentation by Engineer Engineer Hoffman explained the reason for the proposed vacation of public street right -of -way and the utility and drainage easements. He explained that the City owns the property and is in the process of selling it. The easements will be rededicated when the property is re- platted. Mr. Hoffman said that he recommended the easements and cul de sac be vacated, but that temporary right to the West 781i Street cul de sac be retained until after the new frontage road is built and the adjacent property owner's driveway can be moved. Currently the driveway runs through the West 781i Street right -of -way. Member Hovland moved to close the public hearing. Member Johnson seconded the motion. Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold Motion carried. Member Kelly introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2000-37 RESOLUTION VACATING UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENTS AND PUBLIC STREET RIGHT -OF -WAY WHEREAS, a motion of the City Council, on the 6th day of March 2000, fixed a date for a public hearing on a proposed street vacation; and WHEREAS, two weeks published and posted notice of said hearing was given and the hearing was held on the 41h day of April, 2000, at which time all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and WHEREAS, the Council deems it to be in the best interest of the City and of the public that said public street and easement vacation be made; and Page 1 Minutes/Edina City Council/April 4, 2000 WHEREAS, the Council considered the extent the vacation affects existing easements t within the area of the vacation and the extent to which the vacation affects the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling electric, telephone or cable television poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or water pipes, mains, and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacation to continue maintaining the same, or to enter upon such easement area or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove or otherwise attend thereto; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, that the following public street right -of -way, and utility and drainage easements are hereby vacated effective as of April 4, 2000: All drainage and utility easements, created by the plat of Braewood Park, which are contained within the following: Lot 1, except the Easterly 175 feet thereof, Block 1, Braewood Park; Part of that certain drainage and utility easement, created by Document No. 1456628 of record in Hennepin County, Minnesota, being the West 10 feet of the East 185 feet of Lot 1, Block 1, Braewood Park; All of 78th Street, as dedicated in Braewood Park, according to the plat thereof of record in Hennepin County, Minnesota, which lies northerly of the following described line: Commencing at the southeast corner of Lot 1, Block 1, Braewood Park; thence westerly along a southerly line of said Lot, and along a curve concave northerly and having a radius of 7489.44 feet, a central angle of 1 degree 19 minutes 29 seconds and a chord of 173.16 feet bearing South 87 degrees 30 minutes 47 seconds West, an arc distance of 173.16 feet to the intersection of said southerly line with the easterly line of said 781h Street, being the point of beginning of the line to be described; then South 88 degrees 10 minutes 30 seconds West 150.00 feet to the intersection of the westerly line of said 781h Street with the southerly line of said Lot, and there terminating. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said vacation does not affect, and there are continued, reserved, and retained, by the said resolution ordering the vacation, the following existing easements and authority in, on and under the above vacated area: The authority of Northern States Power Company, US West Communications, Paragon Cable Minnesota, or Minnegasco. to enter upon the above vacated area for the maintenance, replacement, repair and removal of and for otherwise attending to, underground conduit, manholes, cables, wires and poles required for utility service now in, on or under the above vacated area. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is authorized and directed to cause a notice of completion of proceedings to be prepared, entered in the transfer record of the County Auditor, and filed with the County Recorder, in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 412.851. Member Johnson seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold Motion carried. RESOLUTION 2000 -38 ADOPTED APPROVING NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR NEED OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT; FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN & CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CONTINUED UNTIL APRIL 18 2000 - FAIRVIEW SOUTHDALE HOSPITAL BUILDING EXPANSION AND PARKING RAMP CONSTRUCTION (6401 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH) Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Page 2 V Minutes/Edina City Council/April 4, 2000 Presentation by Planner Planner Larsen stated there were three items requiring action all related to the proposed expansion of the hospital, the added medical office space, and the parking ramp proposed west of France Avenue. At the first hearing for the hospital expansion, the comment period for the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) was still open so the hearing was continued. Mr. Larsen explained the EAW, was a study of the impact of the development, to ascertain whether a full Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) would be needed. The hospital voluntarily completed the EAW, prepared by BRW, at the request of City staff. The EAW's 30 day comment period for the draft document ended on March 8, 2000. All comments received on the EAW were sent to the Council. The Council was also sent a response to the comments, that lists some findings of fact, supporting a negative declaration, meaning that no EIS would be necessary. Mr. Larsen stated that,if the Council decided to support the negative declaration, they would be able to act on the local zoning requests consisting of a Final Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit. The Final Development Plan would allow the expansion of the hospital on the east side, of France Avenue. The Conditional Use Permit would allow the hospital to construct a four -level parking structure on the west side of France Avenue connected by a skyway to the hospital. Mr. Larsen noted that a major part of the EAW was a traffic study. He introduced Rick Nau of BRW who would review the traffic study, its findings, and BRW's recommendations. Proponent Comment Richard Nau, BRW, Traffic. Consultant for Fairview Southdale reviewed the Fairview Southdale and Southdale Medical Office Building (MOB) Traffic Study. Mr. Nau said the traffic study included the following elements: • Counts of 1999 existing traffic volumes •. Estimate background traffic growth between 1999 and 2005 • Estimate traffic generated by hospital and Southdale MOB expansions • Analyze traffic operations with and without expansion traffic • Determine needed roadway improvements Member Faust asked which medical office building Mr. Nau was referring to in his report; the proposed Fairview expansion or the office building owned by Northco. Mr. Nau said he was referring to the office building owned by Northco. The report included both the expansion of Fairview Hospital and the Southdale Medical Office Building (MOB) owned by Northco. Mr. Nau stated it was determined that the hospital expansion would generate an additional 330 trips per day or a 55% increase and the MOB expansion would generate 264 trips per day or a 45% increase in area traffic. Mr. Nau displayed a graphic illustration of the estimated traffic impact on area intersections after the expansions, showing increases ranging from 2% to 12% by the year 2005, with the intersection at West 651h Street and France Avenue receiving the largest increase at 12 %. He explained ,that increases over 5% were significant. Mr. Nau noted that existing traffic operating deficiencies included close intersection spacing resulting in lack of stacking distance at ramp meters; and a lack of signalization that results in cross street traffic delays. These deficiencies will remain after the expansion and' the additional traffic generated will warrant more signalization of the area. Proposed hospital related mitigation measures would include: Page 3 Minutes/Edina City Council/April 4, 2000 • New guide signs on TH 62 directing westbound hospital traffic to exit at Xerxes Avenue • New guide signs on TH 62 directing eastbound hospital traffic to exit at Valley View Road • Installation of a signal at the intersection of the Valley View ramp to TH 62 • Installation of a signal and reconfiguration of intersection to allow through and left turn movement on all four approaches at Valley View and West 651h Street • Widen Drew Avenue to 40 feet to accommodate three lanes. Mr. Nau added the intent of the proposed mitigation measures would be to bring traffic into the hospital and MOB through Xerxes Avenue and Valley View Road attempting to keep it off France Avenue. Member Hovland asked about MnDOT's comment over lack of a.m. traffic data in the study. Mr. Nau said this was discussed with MnDOT. He said the hospital is generating more traffic during the p.m. peak hour than during the a.m. peak hour. The traffic associated with the hospital does not actually coincide with the peak hours; that is, work shifts of 7 -3. For this reason, a.m. traffic data was not collected. Mr. Nau reported that after this review MnDOT was satisfied with the data provided. Member Hovland asked if there was any expectation that MnDOT would be resistant to the proposed new signage, or the curb cut and signalization at Valley View for the eastbound traffic. Mr. Nau replied that no significant resistance from MnDOT was anticipated relative to the proposed signage. He said that concern was expressed about the curb cut and will reserve judgement until a plan is submitted for their approval, however, in Mr. Nau's opinion this is still a viable solution. Member Hovland asked Mr. Nau if he had any traffic projections for volumes when the recommended mitigation measures were put into place. Mr. Nau replied that the volumes would change to some extent, but not a great deal because most of the percentage increases are relatively low. Member Hovland asked if there were other long range traffic measures that should be investigated in case of additional medical facility expansion in that quadrant. Mr. Nau said he could not comment unless he had a proposal to analyze. Member Faust expressed concern that the traffic study did not include peak a.m. traffic counts. She also asked who would pay for the recommended traffic mitigation measures such as the signals, and if sidewalks were still proposed for installation on Drew Avenue. Member Faust asked if there would still be room to install sidewalks if Drew Avenue were widened to three lanes. Member Kelly asked if Mr. Nau could comment on proposed funding of all the recommended traffic mitigation improvements. Mr. Nau replied that he did believe that there would be room for sidewalks on Drew Avenue and he stated that his traffic study did not address the funding of any of the proposed mitigation measures. He stated his assumption that because the streets involved are state aid streets there should be some funding available, but that a portion of the costs would need'to be paid for locally, and that determination would be the Council's. Member Kelly added that he shared the concerns expressed earlier about the lack of peak a.m. traffic data, especially since there are indications that additional development may occur in the area. Secondly, funding of the needed improvements must be discussed. Member Kelly also Page 4 Minutes/Edina City Council/April 4, 2000 noted his concern about storm water run off. He added the Council has dealt with storm water throughout his tenure. MnDOT said they were very concerned about run off, and he noted this was not mentioned in the response to comments, however, it was stated that the net impervious area would decrease. Would this decrease include the parking structure. Mr. Hoffman explained that the run off from the west side of France would be directed to a new pipe directly down to the pond and would not go into any MnDOT pipes. In his experience in the France Avenue interchange, if a 12 -inch rainfall occurs some flooding will happen, but otherwise it should not be a problem. Member Johnson questioned how BRW could propose to install a signal at the eastbound ramp of TH 62 and West 65th Street in light of the March 8, 2000, MnDOT letter opposing the proposed eastbound signal at West 65th Street. Mr. Nau said that the plan has been reviewed by MnDOT and will require their approval, which BRW believes will be granted. Mr. Nau said that providing a signal and cued detection device to prevent traffic backing up on TH 62 would allay the MnDOT concern. Member Johnson asked if any consideration had been giving to providing direct access from TH 62 to the parking facility similar to downtown Minneapolis's Target Center exits. Mr. Nau. responded that this had. not been considered. He added that the downtown facilities are public not private such as the proposed hospital ramp. Mr. Nau said that he believed a direct access would not be consistent with MnDOT's policy relative to access to trunk highways. Mayor Maetzold asked if the proposed widening of the exit ramp from TH 62 eastbound that link with Valley View Road would necessitate filling the holding pond on Valley View. Mr. Nau replied that at this time there has not been detailed engineering, but a cursory look at the air photos indicated that it could fit within the existing right -of -way. Mayor Maetzold continued asking if encroachment into the pond became necessary would that be considered a significant environmental event. Mr.' Nau hesitated to give a definitive answer„ but suggested that it would most likely be a minor incursion into a storm water holding pond. Member Faust asked if an additional lane off the eastbound TH 62 had been considered. Mr. Hoffman - explained that this additional lane was already planned by the City's consultant SRF to widen the ramp. He added this improvement would be done. in conjunction with the improvement of Valley View Road by the pond. He added that the pond should not be impacted by any proposed improvements to the Valley View interchange. Mark Enger, Fairview Hospital Administrator, 6401 France Avenue South, said that as a result of discussions with City staff, the City Council, citizen input, and Fairview's development staff, the hospital listened to and attempted to respond to most of the questions. Mr. Enger said that changes have occurred in how hospitals deliver service .to patients. Reimbursements for charges have changed. Technological advances have greatly changed patient services. The focus has shifted from in- patient care to more ambulatory based services. He added that there are procedures being performed at Fairview Southdale that two years ago were not dreamed of. Patients are being discharged'on the day of service that five years ago would have spent seven days in the hospital after the procedure. One in .three households in Edina has an elderly member. There has been a great increase in demand for cardiovascular care. Three years ago Fairview began planning in response to the health care needs. Mr. Enger stated that in 1998, expansion plans were begun looking at every vertical and horizontal. possibility to fit expansion on a very tight hospital campus. Mr. Enger noted that the first option was to expand southerly, but the hospital could not come to terms with the other principal so they had to look at other options. He noted there are many medical office buildings on France Avenue and suggested that Page 5 Minutes/Edina City Council/Apri14, 2000 the proposed medical office building expansion be viewed not as a MOB, but as a heart/ vascular care center. This center will allow Edina to offer state -of -the -art care to its residents. Mr. Enger said the hospital is prepared to install sidewalks at Drew Avenue and West 651h Street. They have decided to build the parking ramp at the same time as the other Phase I expansion. Their contractor, Knutson, has arranged for workers parking off -site and not on city streets. Fairview has contracted 430 parking spots at Southdale by Key Cadillac for ten months and intends to shuttle hospital employees during construction. He concluded urging the Council to move forward. Richard Dahl, BWBR Architects, Fairview Southdale's architects took over the presentation. Mr. Dahl used graphics to demonstrate the design changes made in response to comments received earlier. The redesigned project has redistributed the green space on the east side of France, bringing it out as a well - landscaped edge to the campus. On the west side of France Avenue the ramp has been pushed north increasing the green space which will be bermed and landscaped to 40 feet. The variance on West 6511, Street was eliminated, however, there is a 0 lot line variance necessary on the north side bordering the Crosstown Highway. Mr. Dahl showed a sample of the textured concrete that will be the exterior material of the ramp. The ramp will also use glass and aluminum wall for a portion of its exterior. He presented the proposed design of the skyway over France Avenue. Member Kelly asked if any signage was proposed for the skyway. Mr. Enger replied that the Skyway would not have any signage. Dr. Karen Porth, 6363 Fairview Physicians Office Building, Fairview Hospital Chief of Staff, urged the Council to approve the expansion plans. She reported an increased need for medical staff and technology to improve patient care. Dr. Porth said there has been a large increase in heart and vascular illness as our population ages. Technological advances also have increased the amount of procedures available to care for patients. Physicians and patients want this care available to them in an integrated facility and Fairview must expand to meet this need. Fairview has a wonderful group of physicians committed to serving patient needs, but to stay competitive and retain these physicians they must expand. Mr. Enger concluded thanking the Council for the time and urged Council move the expansion plans forward as soon as possible. Public Comment Bruce Carlson, owner of Southdale Medical Building, stated he wanted to present their future plans. Currently Mr. Carlson said his building is at fifty percent capacity for the allowed floor area ratio (FAR) under Edina's zoning code. Mr. Carlson indicated that he intends to expand up to sixty-nine percent of the allowed FAR. He said he supported the hospital's request for expansion. Mr. Carlson showed graphic boards depicting a conceptual potential expansion of his medical office building. It would include a 69,000 square foot office expansion with 75 underground parking spaces and a Y2 half level ramp addition. The proposed three - story building would permit the Minnesota Heart Group to occupy the entire first floor. Mr. Carlson indicated that his building is presently 95% occupied and he is not currently before the Council with an expansion request. He added he supported the hospital's expansion, but wished that Fairview Southdale would allow the Southdale Medical Office Building to expand. Page 6 Minutes/Edina City Council/April 4, 2000 Norbert Weninger, 6566 France Avenue South, Board Chair, Point of France, reviewed the points made in his letter to the Council. Mr. Weninger pointed out the ramp and expansion will increase traffic that is already a nightmare. He added the height of the ramp is of great concern to the fifty residents who have homes facing the ramp. Point of France residents' other concern include the exterior surface of the parking ramp, surface water runoff, and the precedent set by allowing a skyway. Elmer Johnson, 6566 France Avenue, Point ' of France resident. for twenty years asked if the hospital's ramp could be depressed into the ground. Bob Clinton, 6712 Rosemary Lane, asked if the proposed ramp will be free or a pay to park ramp. Mike Callas, 4930 West 77th Street, Edina Chamber of Commerce, stated he was representing Pat Tucker. Mr. Callas explained the Chamber understood the issues and concerns, however they still support the proposed expansion. He read the following Chamber resolution into the record: "EDINA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Fairview Southdale 2000 -2002 Expansion Project WHEREAS, Fairview Southdale Hospital is the Twin Cities' eighth largest hospital and has a reputation for outstanding patient care; and WHEREAS, Fairview Southdale Hospital, a non - profit organization, is Edina's largest year -round employer at more than 2000 employees, a good steward of the Edina Community and committed to meeting the needs of its immediate service area; and WHEREAS, the demographics of the Edina area point to increased demands for cardiovascular services. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors of the Edina Chamber of Commerce does hereby support the Fairview Southdale 2000 -2002 Expansion Project to increase its capacity to serve patients, families and the community. Adopted by the Edina Chamber of Commerce the 15th day of March, 2000." Hugh Thompson, 6301 Colony Way, stated he had two concerns. The first is traffic which is horrendous and secondly, what is the purpose of the surveying on Drew and 651h Street. Bill Bellows, 6566 France. Avenue, asked about what type of greenery was planned for the parking structure's roof. Mr. Bellows also expressed concern over reflection from the aluminum used in the skyway and glass wall design of the elevator and atrium. Laurel Thompson, 6301 Colony Way, added she ,was concerned about all the costs incurred by the proposed expansion. Ms. Thompson asked who would pay for the building. Mayor Maetzold explained the hospital was responsible for any building expansion. The only costs to be decided would be any needed public improvements, such as streets, sidewalks, etc. Iver Ross, 7504 Colony Way, said that he has an office in the 4010 Building and many times now it takes 15 minutes to get home. Mr. Ross said the Colony already has problems with outside cars on their private street. Council Discussion/ Action Member Hovland made a motion seconded by Member Johnson to close the public hearing. Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold Motion carried. Page 7 Minutes/Edina CitXCouncil/April 4, 2000 Mayor Maetzold , asked if the hospital had considered building the parking structure underground and why if there are no plans to go higher is the ramp being oversized in the plans. Mr. Enger replied that it would have added over $1,000,000 to the cost of the ramp to build one level of the ramp underground. He added that while at this time the proposed expansion would serve the hospital for many years, they want to maintain the flexibility of further expansion if it _ becomes necessary in the future. Member Faust asked if a variance would be required to add to the ramp in the future. Mr. Larsen said that any future expansion to the ramp would require conditional use permit approval in the future, even without any need for a variance. Member Hovland asked about the lighting proposed for the ramp. Mr. Dahl said that the lighting would be downcast and the fixtures would be cut off fixtures to keep the light confined within the ramp to avoid any glare at Point of France. He added the lights could be directed northward also. Member Faust asked if all levels of the ramp would have handicapped access, whether security issues have been looked at with such a parking ramp and if employees will be charged to park in the ramp. Mr. Dahl said that there will be handicapped parking stalls clustered on each level of the ramp near the elevator. He added that his firm has designed a number of parking ramps and a number of security measures are rolled into each design. He said that his firm follows guidance during the design stage from a Minneapolis ordinance developed to deal specifically with such security issues. Mr. Enger added that the hospital currently has 24 -hour security and may need to add more resources when this expansion occurs. He informed the Council that hospital employees will be charged at a modest rate to park in the ramp. Mayor Maetzold asked how to ensure the Drew Avenue sidewalks are made a part of the project. Mr. Hughes answered that the sidewalk installation could be made a condition of the approval or Council could direct City staff to come back and hold a project hearing for the purpose of installing the improvement and assessing the cost to benefited property owners. Mayor Maetzold asked about the larger issue of requiring the hospital to pay a portion of the traffic improvements identified for the area. Mr. Hoffman explained that only portions of the improvements would be state aid eligible. He said that West 651h Street from Valley View is not a state aid street, so no gas tax funds could be used for that leg of the intersection improvements. He proposed that possible sources of funds would come from MnDOT for ramp improvements, gas tax on state aid street, special assessments to larger area, and a specified amount to be assigned to the ramp because of its location and impact on the surrounding area. Mr. Hughes explained that three legs of the intersection would be eligible for state aid funding and one would not. So one - fourth of the total cost must be funded locally as a special assessment to an area determined to be benefited from the improvement. Member Faust asked if the one - fourth share for the installation of the two stop lights would be around $100,000. Mr. Hoffman said that no feasibility has been done, but that could be a rough estimate. Member Hovland asked about potential costs of signalizing Xerxes Avenue and 64th Street. Mr. Hoffman said that again a portion could be funded through state aid and the rest would be local funding. He added this signal also involves Richfield. Member Hovland continued asking about the France Avenue bridge deck over the Crosstown Highway. Mr. Hoffman said this project currently is entirely funded by MnDOT, Hennepin County and the City. Page 8 Minutes/Edina City Council/Apri14, 2000 Member Faust asked how an assessment might be calculated for widening of Drew Avenue. Mr. Hoffman said that would be determined by the Council. An assessment could be either a front foot or an area assessment. Mayor Maetzold asked if the Council should become involved in the exterior finish of the parking ramp and landscaping in light of the Point of France residents' concerns. Mr. Hughes answered that Council could as part of the final development plan approval, specify building materials and to the extent that it pleases the Council to have said materials presented. He added that the City has typically not become involved in the colors, but has requested certain types of materials be used for exterior finishes. Mr. Hughes said that landscaping is also a part of final development plan approval. The Council may specify the type and or size of plantings they would like to see. He reminded the Council that developers must post landscaping bonds to ensure compliance with their approved plans. Member Hovland asked about Mr. Weninger's concern about storm water from the ramp flowing into Point of France's pond. Mr. Hoffman explained that would not happen, that the storm water would flow into a pipe directed further west along Valley View, leaving less water actually getting to the Point of France pond. Member Johnson asked if procedurally the Council should become involved in the details as raised this evening when either approving or denying such a request. He added that he still has concern about traffic issues and who is planning to pay for the improvements discussed this evening. Member Johnson indicated that he supported the hospital's expansion project, but wants assurance that the details will be taken care when approval is given. Mayor Maetzold noted these are very legitimate concerns. He said that perhaps the expansion of the hospital will act as a catalyst starting some necessary improvements in the area. Mayor Maetzold added that he drives France Avenue daily and in his experience at 7:00 a.m., there is not a problem with traffic. However, from 2:30 p.m. and later, gridlock is a problem in the area. Member Kelly stated he has a number of comments. He thanked the hospital for responding to concerns raised earlier. Elimination of the 651'' Street variance and the addition of green space, changing the time of the ramp construction and providing additional ramp design were laudable. He stated he appreciated all the changes that indicate the hospital development team has listened and responded. Member Kelly also stated that he. thinks everyone agrees that the hospital is a 'very important and valuable asset to the community; and expansion should 'go forward on this site. The question is what expansion should be approved and how should it look. Member Kelly voiced concern over the. collateral impact of approving the expansion. He expressed grave concern over how all the pieces fit together and their impact on'the entire area of the City. This has been' Member Kelly's concern all along. Are the traffic solutions proposed today, solutions that will address continued growth in the. particular area and the development that is contemplated from the Crosstown to the Galleria. Member Kelly stated: that the Council must be responsible and take a global look at development in that particular area because it has already seen one additional plan come forward. He added that Southdale has been kicking around various plans and he would be reluctant to pursue development in a piecemeal fashion, not considering the collateral effect of such development. Member Kelly said he was deeply concerned that the collateraleffect of the development has not been studied. In particular, he said that no a.m. traffic counts had been done. He said that addressing developer costs in the assessment period would be akin to closing the barn door after the horse is gone. In order to adequately address development, you must address how the costs are going to be covered in the Page 9 Minutes/Edina City Council/April 4, 2000 non state aid areas. Everyone has differing views of what the hospital's fair share of the improvement would be and waiting until the assessment leaves the City open to legal challenges if the hospital determines they are being unduly burdened. However, if an agreement is reached while working out the conditional use permit, the City avoids any further potential disagreement down the line. Member Kelly said that an agreement is needed prior to granting approval, and more detail is also needed on the traffic counts prior to approval. Member Kelly said that he did not want his comments interpreted as meaning that he thought the proposed expansion was a poorly designed landscape plan, or that he does not favor expansion in the area. However, he stated that as discussed earlier; the Council should pause and study the area from the Galleria to the Crosstown, knowing that there will be expansion of medical and retail uses in the area. It should be found out how the pieces best fit together comprehensively. For this reason he would not support approval at this time, what he favors instead is taking sometime to really study the area comprehensively. If, however, the Council decides to move forward he urged that they consider in the Conditional Use Permit the material and landscaping approval discussed, and make sure no signage be allowed on the skyway. Member Faust stated her main concern is the parking ramp and the Point of France residents. She said she believed the plans, as presented, for the parking ramp are very preliminary. The Council has not seen a definitive ramp plan and that should be presented before any approval is granted. Member Faust said that' looking at the overall development in the area should have been done twenty years ago. She agreed it will be hard to develop further in this area because of all the traffic issues, but changing development standards now seems counter - productive. Member Hovland said he believes the core problem is traffic just like in many other parts of the City. However, the hospital is not the generator of most of the traffic. Hindsight says that better planning twenty years ago would leave us with more options. However, the City must do the best it can with what is available in a compressed area. Personally, Member Hovland thinks the hospital has come up with. good ideas in a tight area. He likes the parking ramp on the west -side of France Avenue with the skyway across to the hospital. He agrees with no signage being allowed on the skyway. Member Hovland stated that conditions should be inserted into the conditional use permit or developer's agreement covering: landscape plan being satisfactory to staff, making sure that lighting is appropriately downcast to protect neighbors, and that the exterior building materials and skyway design be incorporated into the an agreement with the hospital. He said that issues involving state aid, gas tax, or special assessments, could be dealt with subsequent in time to approving the project. Member Hovland asked staff if the entire area of the project could be defined and then the allocation of cost dealt with later, so as not to make it a condition of approving the final development plan or conditional use permit. Mr. Hughes said he thought that separating the improvements made sense because they are all off -site of the hospital campus. They are part of intersections the City controls and the issue later becomes allocation of the cost of the improvements. Mayor Maetzold asked if the cost allocation could be done based upon the number of employees. Mr. Hughes replied he had never heard of that formula, but a close corollary would be assessments levied based upon floor area instead of lot area. Member Hovland acknowledged the concerns of Point of France and said they could be addressed. However, he questioned whether the City could regulate the structure of the parking ramp foundation. Member Hovland said he believed the Comprehensive Plan has already been put into place with one area of concern, Southdale. He said the quadrant where all the medical buildings are located may in the future become an even more expanded medical facility and maybe that entire expansion would be great news for the entire community. Member Hovland Page 10 Minutes/Edina City Council/April 4, 2000 t added that he thought the expansion of the hospital was fantastic, that perhaps Fairview would become a regional medical center. Member Hovland acknowledged traffic is a , problem to be resolved. As future developments come forward the Council's job will be to review each project He expressed concern over the Southdale shopping area. However, if the medical quadrant continues to grow, perhaps an extended stay hotel will develop or some additional shopping capabilities for Southdale. Perhaps the medical quadrant could even become a mini "Mayo'. Member Hovland believes that conditions could be placed upon approvals protecting Point of France, which the developer has indicated being amenable to, so he favored moving forward. Mayor Maetzold agreed, with Member Hovland. He also agreed with Member Kelly's concern for France Avenue. Mayor Maetzold supported moving ahead with the hospital expansion at this time. He suggested that Member Kelly's suggestion of more comprehensive plan of the area, however, be pursued with the City's Vision 20/ 20 planning process. Member Johnson asked a procedural question. about the action required. He wanted to know if a list of conditions could be attached to the approvals. Mayor Maetzold asked staff if the conditions could be contained under the final development plan and conditional use permit. Mr. Hughes responded that the Council should either approve or deny the resolution on the EAW, then conditions with respect to cost of surrounding street system would be best addressed with the final development plan, and any conditions dealing with the ramp should be part of the conditional use permit. Member Kelly asked for clarification from the City Attorney on the best method of handling the cost issues associated with the development. Attorney Boelter said that perhaps traffic issues should be attached to both the final development plan and the conditional use permit. Member Faust interjected that she wanted to see a parking ramp design, not just the potential materials. Motion by Member Hovland, seconded by Member Johnson introducing the following resolution and moving its approval: RESOLUTION NO. 2000-38, CITY OF EDINA A RESOLUTION APPROVING NEGATIVE DECLARATION WHEREAS, Fairview Southdale Hospital is the proposer of the project consisting of a 174,000 square foot expansion to the west and north of the existing facility, a four - level, 970 - vehicle parking ramp west of France Avenue, and an east/west connection via a skyway, located in the city of Edina (the "City"); and WHEREAS, the city of Edina is the Responsible Governmental Unit pursuant to Minnesota Rules Part 4410.0500; and WHEREAS, the EAW, was prepared using the form approved by the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board for EAW's in accordance with Minnesota Rules 4410.1300; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Minnesota Rules 4410.1500, the EAW was completed and distributed on January 31, 2000 to all persons and agencies on the official Environmental Quality Board distribution list; and WHEREAS, the notification of the EAW was published in the Minnesota EQB Monitor on February 7, 2000; and WHEREAS, the public review and comment period remained open until March 8,2000; and WHEREAS, the comments on the EAW were received and responded to; and WHEREAS, this decision is made in compliance with the time schedule provided in Minnesota Rules 4410.1700; and Page 11 Minutes/Edina City Council/April 4, 2000 WHEREAS, the record considered by the City Council for purposes of it decision herein consists of the EAW, related reports and analysis; the comments received thereon, and the responses to such comments, all of which are incorporated herein and made a part of this decision; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, acting with respect to the Environmental Assessment Worksheet for the Fairview Southdale Medical Campus Expansion, that it finds and concludes the following: 1. The EAW was prepared in compliance with the procedures of the Minnesota Policy Act and Minnesota Rules, Parts 4410.1000 to 4410.1700; and 2. The EAW satisfactorily addressed all of the issues for which existing information could have been reasonably obtained; and 3. The findings of fact contained in Exhibit A (attached) are made; and 4. Based on criteria established in Minnesota Rules 4410.1700, and the findings of fact, the Project does not have a potential for significant environmental effects; and 5. An Environmental Impact' Statement is not required, and the City of Edina therefore makes a "Negative Declaration ". Adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota this 41h day of April, 2000.. Roll call: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Maetzold Nay: Kelly Resolution adopted on a 4 -1 vote. Member Hovland made a motion to approve the final development plan and conditional use permit. Mayor Maetzold seconded the motion. Motion died. Member Johnson suggested that conditions be attached to the approval, by either amendment or delay. He stated he wants to see the conditions and wants them well thought out. Member Hovland said that in the past the Council has crafted the conditions at the final hearing. Member Kelly stated he did not see how the cost issues can be addressed at this time and that he had previously pointed out the flaws of moving to a special assessment improvement. Member Hovland asked Members Kelly and Johnson how they would suggest an agreement be reached with the hospital on the cost allocation. Member Kelly said that after the costs are known; a reasonable apportionment be mutually agreed upon with all concerned parties. If this is not done, during the assessment process the City is open to legal challenges. Member Hovland asked why not use the special assessment process to ascertain the allocation. He said he felt the approval should be moved forward and let the special assessment process take care of the allocation of the improvement costs. Otherwise, in his opinion there would be an unfair delay to the hospital. He stated that he felt it would be more fair to use the due process of a special assessment project. Member Kelly disagreed, stating that taxpayers could be subjected to additional expenses of legal defense of an assessment. Mayor Maetzold stated he agreed with Member Hovland that the special assessment process should be allowed to take care of the cost allocation. If approval is delayed two weeks there would still be others who should have a share of the cost that would not be able to be brought into the mix. In Mayor Maetzold's opinion following a special assessment process would be the most equitable way to proceed. Member Kelly stated he was not advocating the hospital pay more than a fair share, just that the share be decided before any approval. Member Johnson noted that Mr. Enger had stated earlier he would be willing to work with the City in paying a fair portion of the needed improvements. He suggested that City staff work with the hospital to achieve an agreement for cost apportionment. Member Johnson said that he would be prepared to vote on the expansion at the next Council Page 12 Minutes/Edina Ci!y Council/April 4, 2000 meeting if something can be agreed to between the City and the hospital. Member Faust asked that the Drew Avenue sidewalk be included in the discussion. Member Kelly made a motion continuing action .until April 18, 2000, on the final development plan and conditional use permit request of Fairview Southdale Hospital and directing staff: to negotiate a cost sharing agreement with respect to the improvements at Valley View Road and West 651h Street, and Drew Avenue; to provide additional details as to the ramp design; and to develop the conditions necessary for said approvals. Member Faust seconded the motion. Member Johnson stated he would support the motion, however, he did not want to dictate materials, etc. to the hospital. Member Hovland noted that a month ago when he saw'this plan he was very concerned about costs. His first impression was that the hospital should pay all the costs. However, upon further reflection, he decided using the special assessment method would be better. Mr. Enger asked that Southdale Medical Center be made a part of any cost sharing negotiation involving the proposed improvements. Mayor Maetzold told Mr. Enger that this would be decided upon by City staff. Ayes: Faust, Johnson, Kelly Nay: Hovland, Maetzold Motion carried on a 3 -2 vote. *RESOLUTION NO. 2000 -39 LOT DIVISION APPROVED FOR 5000 AND 5004 KELSEY TERRACE (CARL HANSEN) Motion made by Member Johnson and seconded by Member Hovland approving the following resolution: RESOLUTION 2000 -39 WHEREAS, the following described properties are at present single tracts of land: Lots 18 and 19, Block 2, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 24TH ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, situated in Hennepin County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the owner has requested the subdivision as follows: PARCEL A: That part of Lot 18, Block 2, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 24TH ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof and situated in Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying north of the south 10.59 feet thereof. PARCEL B: Lot 19, and the south 10.59 feet of Lot 18, Block 2, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 24TH ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof and situated in Hennepin County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the requested subdivision. is authorized under Code Section 810 and it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said newly created Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purpose of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained "in the City of Edina Code Sections 810 and 850; NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of the above described tracts of land (PARCEL A and PARCEL B) as separate tracts of land are hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Code Sections 850 and 810 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but only to the extent permitted under Code Sections 810 and 850 Page 13 Minutes/Edina City Council/April 4, 2000 subject to the limitations set out in Code Section 850 and said Ordinances are not waived for any other purpose or as to any other provisions thereof, and further subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent Ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those Ordinances. Adopted this 4th day of April, 2000. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. TRANSFER OF CONTROL FOR TIME WARNER CABLE CONTINUED Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Mr. Hughes explained that the City's franchisee, KBL Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc. has requested that the City approve a proposed transfer of control of the Franchisee resulting from the merger of to -be- formed subsidiaries of the existing parent corporation of the franchisee, Time Warner Inc. and America Online, Inc. into a new company and ultimate parent of the franchisee called AOL Time Warner, Inc. Mr. Hughes introduced Brian Grogan, counsel for the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission. Mr. Grogan informed the Council that there was probably no legal or technical basis to deny the request to transfer the control, however, he suggested that action be delayed for thirty days to allow for the Southwest Cable Commission to work through some issues and concerns with the franchisee. The Council briefly discussed the Open Access considerations that are being reviewed. The consensus of the Council was to delay action until April 18 or May 2, 2000. Member Johnson made a motion, seconded by Member Kelly to close the public hearing and, continue action on this item for thirty days. Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold Motion carried. *BID AWARDED FOR COMFORT STATION AT WOODDALE PARK Motion made by Member Johnson and seconded by Member Hovland for award of bid for the Wooddale Park comfort station to recommended low bidder, K.A. Witt Construction, Inc., at $119,047.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR FOURTH OF JULY FIREWORKS Motion made by Member Johnson and seconded by Member Hovland for award of bid for the July Fourth fireworks display to sole bidder, RES Specialty Pyrotechnics, at $11,000.00 Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR WATER METERS Motion made by Member Johnson and seconded by Member Hovland for award of bid_ for water meters to sole bidder, Hydro Supply Company, and not to exceed $76,184.58. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *AMM NOMINATIONS SOLICITED FOR BOARD OF DIRECTORS VACANCIES Motion made by Member Johnson and seconded by Member Hovland acknowledging receipt of a letter dated March 22, 2000, soliciting nominations for the Board of Directors of the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities (AMM) by no later than April 10, 2000. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. Page 14 Minutes/Edina City Council/April 4, 2000 BLANKET RIGHT -OF -WAY PERMIT AND FACILITY USE AGREEMENT FOR'METRICOM INC. APPROVED Assistant Manager Anderson explained that last September, Metricom approached the City requesting approval of a blanket right -of -way (ROW) permit and facility use agreement. Metricom is introducing a new wireless high speed internet service to the area early next year and will compete with USWest's ISDN and Megabit service and Time Warner's Roadrunner service. Metricom requires the ability to attach shoebox size radios to lightpoles, traffic signals or power poles. Under state statutes, Metricom can locate their equipment in the ROW but would need to apply on either a pole by pole or project'by project basis for individual ROW permits. Metricom is requesting the City grant a blanket ROW permit as opposed to the multiple permit process. In return, the City_ would be reimbursed with a combination of pole fees, a percentage of gross revenues and free subscriptions in addition to our own ROW permit fees. The League of Minnesota Cities, the Suburban Rate Authority and attorney's for the City of Edina have reviewed the agreement. Following staff discussion, staff feels Metricom has complied with language changes in the agreement addressing concerns. Mr. Anderson noted that Metricom is seeking approval of the agreement in 75 communities and 7 counties in the area. To date, 34 communities and 2 counties have approved the agreement. Metricom is currently operating this service in a number of large cities with plans to expand to more metropolitan areas during the year. Following Council discussion, Member Kelly made a motion approving the right -of -way permit and facility use agreement for Metricom, Inc. subject to no obligation by the City of Edina to relocate Metricom radios if power lines are moved underground. Member Johnson seconded the motion. Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold Motion carried. *ELECTION EQUIPMENT AGREEMENT WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY APPROVED Motion made by Member Johnson and seconded by Member Hovland approving the proposed agreement with Hennepin County authorizing the trade -in of Edina's existing optical scan equipment, the use of optical scan election equipment owned by Hennepin County,-including the outlined maintenance costs. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *RESOLUTION NO. 2000 -40 PHASE II SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED Motion made by Member Johnson and seconded by Member Hovland approving the following resolution: RESOLUTION NO. 2000 -40 , RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PHASE II SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS: IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Y399, L020 AND L021 WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution of the Council a report has been prepared by the Edina sanitary sewer consultant, Tolt, King, Duvall, Anderson & Associates, TKDA, with reference to the sanitary sewer diversion project, reconstruction of the lift station at -West 62nd Street and Pamela Park, and construction of a new lift station at Garrison Lane. This report was received by the Council on December 15,1997. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Edina City Council that Project Y399, the sanitary sewer diversion project; Project L020, reconstruction of the lift station at West 62 "a Page 15 Minutes/Edina City Counci]/Apri14, 2000 street and Pamela Park; and Project L021, a new lift station at Garrison Lane are hereby ordered. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Engineer is hereby authorized to prepare plans and specifications and advertise for bids. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *RESOLUTION NO. 2000 -41 APPROVED AUTHORIZING COUNTRY CLUB STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS Motion made by Member Johnson and seconded by Member Hovland approving the following resolution: RESOLUTION NO. 2000-41 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS IN THE COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT, IMPROVEMENT NO. STS -253 WHEREAS, pursuant to a resolution of the Council, a report has been prepared by the Edina storm sewer consultant, Barr Engineering, with reference to the Country Club District, Storm Sewer Improvements. This report was received by the Council on December 15, 1997. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Edina City Council that Project STS - 253, storm sewer project along Bridge Street in the center of the district and additional storm sewer at the Sunnyside and Arden/Grimes intersection. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Engineer is hereby authorized to prepare plans and specifications and advertise for bids. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *RESOLUTION NO. 2000 -42 APPROVED AUTHORIZING BRAEMAR TRUNK HIGHWAY 169 FRONTAGE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS Motion made by Member Johnson and seconded by Member Hovland approving the following resolution: RESOLUTION NO. 2000-42 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING BRAEMAR TRUNK HIGHWAY 169 FRONTAGE ROAD IMPROVEMENT BA -317 AND RELATING TO PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON S.A.P. 120-176-01 WHEREAS, a report has been prepared by the Edina City Engineer with reference to Public Improvement No. BA -317, to Braemar Trunk Highway 169 Frontage Road from Braemar Arena to West 781h Street; and WHEREAS, the City of Edina has planned the construction of MSAS 176, to Braemar Trunk Highway 169 Frontage Road from Braemar Arena to West 781h Street; WHEREAS, the City of Edina will be expending Municipal State Aid Funds on the construction of this frontage road; and WHEREAS, this said frontage road will not provide adequate width for parking on both sides of the street, and approval of the proposed construction as a Municipal State Aid Street project must therefore be conditioned upon certain parking restrictions; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Council has duly considered the views . of all persons interested, and being fully advised of the pertinent facts, does hereby determine to proceed with the construction of said improvement, including all proceedings which may be necessary in eminent domain for the acquisition of necessary easements and rights hereby designated and shall be referred to in all subsequent proceedings as Public Improvement No. BA -317, to Braemar Trunk Highway 169 Frontage Road from Braemar Arena to West 78th Street, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, by the Edina City Council: 1. Improvement No. BA -317, to Braemar Trunk Highway 169 Frontage Road from Braemar Arena to West 78th Street is hereby ordered as proposed; Page 16 Minutes/Edina City Council/April 4, 2000 2. The Edina City Engineer is hereby designated as the Engineer for: this improvement. The City Engineer shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvement; 3. The City Engineer is hereby authorized to advertise and take bids for Improvement No. BA -317 to Braemar Trunk Highway 169 Frontage Road from Braemar Arena to West 78th Street; and 4. That the "City" shall ban the parking of motor vehicles on both sides of MSAS 176 Braemar Trunk Highway 169 Frontage Road from West 781h Street to the south end of the Braemar Arena Parking Lot, at all times. 5. That the "City" shall ban parking on the west side of Braemar Trunk Highway. 169 Frontage Road adjacent to the Braemar Arena parking lot area. Adopted this 41h day of April, 2000. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *RESOLUTION NO. 2000 -43 APPROVED SETTING PUBLIC HEARING DATE OF MAY 2 2000, FOR STREET REHABILITATION PROTECT IMPROVEMENT A -189, SCHOOL ROAD, RUTH DRIVE AND WEST 59TH STREET Motion made by Member Johnson and seconded by Member Hovland introducing the following resolution and moving its adoption:. RESOLUTION NO. 2000-43 RESOLUTION SETTING PUBLIC HEARING DATE OF MAY 2.2000, FOR STREET REHABILITATION PROJECT IMPROVEMENT A -189, SCHOOL ROAD, RUTH DRIVE AND WEST 59TH STREET BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL. that the Council shall meet at 7:00 P.M. on the 2nd day of May, 2000, in the Council Chambers of Edina City Hall, to consider improvement No. A -189, for street rehabilitation based on the condition of School Road, Ruth Drive and West 591h Street and the assessment of abutting property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the City Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvement as required by law. Adopted this 41h day of April, 2000. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *RESOLUTION 2000 -44 APPROVED AMENDING SOUTHWEST MUTUAL AID ASSOCIATION Motion made by Member Johnson and seconded by Member. Hovland approving the following resolution: RESOLUTION NO. 2000-44 RESOLUTION APPROVING ADDITION OF CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS.TO SOUTHWEST MUTUAL AID ASSOCIATION WHEREAS, the City of Edina has previously approved and participated in a mutual aid agreement between the southwest suburban governmental agencies to provide cooperative use of fire personnel and equipment; WHEREAS, the agencies participating in this agreement have been designated the Southwest Mutual Aid Association; WHEREAS, the existing agreement requires the parties of the agreement to approve by resolution a new "Exhibit A" to add a new member to the agreement, WHEREAS, the City of Minneapolis would like to join the Association and would add to the overall effectiveness; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that the revised "Exhibit A" dated 2,/16/00, which includes the City of Minneapolis is hereby Page 17 .y Minutes/Edina City Council/April 4, 2000 approved as the new official list of parties to the agreement establishing the Southwest 4 Mutual Aid Association. The City Clerk is directed to transmit a certified copy of this resolution to the Secretary of the Southwest Mutual Aid Association. Adopted this 41h day of April, 2000. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *2000-2001 LOCAL 49ER'S AGREEMENT (PUBLIC WORKS/PARK MAINTENANCE) APPROVED Motion made by Member Johnson and seconded by Member Hovland approving the Local 49er's Public Works and Park Maintenance 2000 -2001 contract. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *RESOLUTION NO. 2000 -45 AUTHORIZING RENOVATION OF DAKOTA TRAIL SEWER LIFT STATION Motion made by Member Johnson and seconded by Member Hovland approving the following resolution: RESOLUTION NO. 2000-45 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING DAKOTA TRAIL SANITARY SEWER LIFT STATION RENOVATION NO. LS -21 WHEREAS, pursuant to the City of Edina's Capital Improvement Plan it has been determined that the Dakota Trail Lift Station requires renovation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Edina City Council that Project LS -21, sanitary sewer lift station renovation project along Dakota Trail is ordered. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Engineer is hereby authorized to prepare plans and specifications.and advertise for bids. Adopted this 41h day of April, 2000. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. CLAIMS PAID Motion made by Member Faust approving payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated March 29, 2000, and consisting of 30 pages: General Fund $317,543.64; Communications $144.95; Working Capital $1,913.67; Art Center $15,899.79; Golf Dome Fund $1,687.62; Swimming Pool Fund $44.60; Golf Course Fund $55,116.45; Ice Arena Fund $5,203.87; Edinborough/Centennial Lakes $11,521.12; Utility Fund $29,815.26; Storm Sewer Utility Fund $355.51; Liquor Dispensary Fund $175,814.22; Construction Fund $90,467.56; Park Bond Fund $5,390.62; TOTAL $710,918.88; and for confirmation of payment of claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated March 29, 2000, and consisting of 6 pages: General Fund $452,848.38; Communications $3,746.81; Working Capital $41,141.20; Art Center $849.09; Golf Dome Fund $1,128.12; Swimming Pool Fund $378.66; Golf Course Fund $3,653.13; Ice Arena Fund $6,477.65; Edinborough/Centennial Lakes $9,704.03; Utility Fund $254,317.04; Storm Sewer Fund $1,084.85; Liquor Dispensary Fund $69,553.44; TOTAL $844,882.40. Member Kelly seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold Motion carried. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Maetzold adjourned the Council Meeting at 10:35 P.M. City Clerk Page '18 MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE EDINA BOARD OF REVIEW HELD AT CITY HALL APRIL 10, 2000, AT 5:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Faust, Kelly, Hovland and Mayor Maetzold. The meeting was convened pursuant to published Notice of Board of Review in the Edina Sun - Current and notice posted on City bulletin boards for the purpose of hearing those persons who considered themselves aggrieved by their property valuation for assessment purposes, or who were requesting homestead classification. Mayor Maetzold stated no decision would be made at this meeting, but would take place at the continuation meeting of the Board on April 18, 2000. He added that. property owners would be notified of the Board's decision within twenty days. Further appeal may be made to the Hennepin County Board of Equalization beginning June 19, 2000. The following property owners appeared personally or were represented before the Board to object to the Assessor's estimated market value as of January 2, 2000: The Council heard the owners present their reasons ror reclUebLLL% icuLU-uv1L0 cuiu ui OWu« asked questions clarifying issues. Assessors Owners' Name /Address PID Number Est. Mkt. Value Value Alex Margarita Zhuravel 32- 117 -21-41 -0068 $236,400 $210,000 5812 Hansen Road Lloyd & Marlys Lofgren 08- 116 -21 -32 -0006 $348,800 $299,200 7405 Gleason Road Eleanor Swandby, 18- 028 - 24-451 -0149 $260,500 $243,800 Estate Rep Lawrence Swandby to 5124 Juanita Avenue $245,000 Robert J. & Helen Malby 05- 116 -21- 14- 0043 $49,500 $220,000 6517 Limerick Drive Richard and Angela Perrin 32- 117 -21-43 -0051 $35,000 $234,000 5608 Highland Road Jacqueline S. Mithun 18- 028 -24-44 -0067 $277,300 $248,000 5308 Halifax Avenue Helen Hovelson 06- 116 - 021 -43 -0038 $191,100 $169,400 6913 Mark Terrace Drive Miguel & Silvia Azar 31- 117 -21 -24- 0016 $456,600 $396,000 6609 Field Way Wayne Lu & Jean Jiang 05- 116 -21 -11 -0070 $200,900 $190,900 6201 Hansen Road Burton & Marjorie Ruedy 28- 117 -21 -24 -0061 $153,900 Resident did 5048 Edinbrook Lane not suggest a value Elizabeth Jenson 28- 117 -21 -24 -0062 $158,400 $129,000 5044 Edinbrook Lane Wayne Rice/ Team France Partnership 31- 028 -24-14 -0001 $2,9691'000 $2,000,000 7200 France Avenue south Danforth & Virginia Leach 06- 116 -21 -33 -0054 $328,000 $254,000 6705 Samuel Road Andy. Poncius 31- 028 -24-22 -0074 $193,100 $181,100 4909 Trillium Lane The Council heard the owners present their reasons ror reclUebLLL% icuLU-uv1L0 cuiu ui OWu« asked questions clarifying issues. Minutes/Edina Board of Review /ARril 10, 2000 The owners of the following properties submitted applications or letters objecting to their market value and requested the Board's review, however, the owners did not appear personally: Member Kelly made a motion closing the public hearing for the 2000 Edina Board of Review. Member Faust seconded the motion Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold Motion carried Member Kelly made a motion continuing the Edina 2000 Board of Review until 5:00 p.m. April i8, 2000. For decision on the appeals presented. Member Hovland seconded the motion. Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold Motion carried City Clerk Page 2 Assessors Owners' Nam /Address PID Number Est. Mkt. Value Value Eduard & Lybov Yamnik 07- 116 -21 -21 -0047 $215,200 $205,000 7133 V ley View Road Norman P. Chapel 18- 028 -24-23 -0058 $1,073,800 $940,000 4622 Ed ebrook Place Edward & Rosemary McGlynn 29- 117 -21 -13 -0006 $622,000 $500,000 .4909 Rolling Green Parkway Withdrawn By Owner KPMG, Inc. for Shaner Hotel 32- 0208 - 24-34 -0025 $9721,100 $7,700,000 Hawthorne Suites Edina & 3400 Edinborou h Way - 027 - 24-21 -0004 $195,800 $180,000 Anthony & Polly Mitchell . 105-:11:16-21-14-0006 6417 Limerick Drive Duane & Delphy Haglund 05- 116 -21 -14 -0040 $202,600 $160,000 6505 Limerick Drive Debra Neuger & William McCabe 32- 117 -21-44 -0003 $186,300 $172,500 6124 Hansen Road Prakash & Kamala V. Puram 08- 116 -21 -31 -0075 $775,500 $700,000 5700 Long Brake Trail Frank Cardarelle 33- 117 -21 -34 -0122 $399,000 $380,000 6125 W' an Avenue Robert L. Kellogg 31- 117 -21-42 -0037 $267,500 6424 Aspen Road Chris Wellens 30- 117 -21 -22 -0016 $57,000 -0- 410 Madison Avenue 05 -1156 -21-41 -0071 $278,100 $252,000 Craig Zachman 6624 Limerick Drive Stephanie M. Lehman 05- 116 -21 -11 -0039 $169,000 5348 Whiting Avenue Withdrawn By Owner Dorothy A. Kronlokken 19- 028 -24-31 -0125 $111,400 5909 Ashcroft Avenue Withdrawn By Owner Member Kelly made a motion closing the public hearing for the 2000 Edina Board of Review. Member Faust seconded the motion Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold Motion carried Member Kelly made a motion continuing the Edina 2000 Board of Review until 5:00 p.m. April i8, 2000. For decision on the appeals presented. Member Hovland seconded the motion. Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold Motion carried City Clerk Page 2 )"OTA REPORURECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: Craig Larsen City Planner Date: April 18, 2000 Subject: Final Development Plan & Conditional Use Permit. Fairview Southdale Hospital 6401 and 6400 France Ave. Recommendation: Agenda Item: II. A & B Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ® Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Continue hearing on proposed Final Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit to the May 2, 2000, City Council meeting. Info /Background: The delay is requested in order to allow staff time to reach agreement on cost sharing for recommended roadway, sidewalk and intersection improvements. Staff has advised the management of the Colony and Point of France of the delay. 0 S o e ,eea 0 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item: II. C. From: Craig Larsen Consent ❑ City Planner Information Only ❑ Date: April 18, 2000 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Final Rezoning and Final Action ❑ Motion Plat Approval. ® Resolution Frauenshuh Companies. ❑ Ordinance 169/494. ❑ Discussion Recommendation: The Planning Commission recommends Final Rezoning approval and Final Plat approval. Info /Background: See attached Planning Commission minutes, staff report, and plans. EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 29, 2000 STAFF REPORT Z -00 -1 Frauenshuh Companies & S -00 -1 7101 West 78th Street Request: Final Rezoning from POD -1 to POD -2 and Final Plat Approval for Two Lot Subdivision General Location: Northeastern quadrant of Highways 16 and 494 The City Council granted preliminary rezoning and preliminary plat approval on February 15, 2000. The plan approved illustrated a 7 story, 168,000 square foot building supported by a seven story parking structure on Lot 1 of the proposed plat. Lot 2 is reserved for future development. The proponents have now submitted plans in support of their request for final rezoning and final plat approval. The final plans continue to illustrate a seven story building, but with a floor area of 178,234. The increased floor area is achieved by completing what was a partial 7th floor. On site parking has increased to743 stalls to support the larger building. Both the floor area and parking comply with ordinance requirements. Preliminary approval for this development was conditioned on necessary permits from MNDOT and Nine Mile Watershed District. The necessary permits have now been granted. Recommendation: The proponents have met all requirements for final approval of the rezoning and subdivision. The plans presented are consistent with plans given preliminary approval and all permits by other agencies have been secured. Staff recommends Final Rezoning and Final Plat approval. construction this year, and finish the road to coincide with the opening of the building. Commissioner Ingwalson noted the revision in the plans, and questioned Mr. Larsen if the variances required remain the same. Mr. Larsen responded the variances remain the same as previously approved. Commissioner Lonsbury asked Mr. Larsen where the additional parking stalls came from. Mr. Larsen said with revision the ramp became larger resulting in more spaces. Commissioner Ingwalson moved to recommend Final Rezoning and Final Plat approval. Commissioner McClelland seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. c F Re- Zoning and Final Plan Development Submittal fors . ! 1 . 1-494 LOCATION PLAN T1 COVER SHEET NWY. 62 / 212 CML CID TOPOGRAPHIC 5URVEY CLI GEOMETRIC AND PAVING PLAN CI] 0 CL3 p esaE"M eLVCX CIA CIVIL DETAIL 1 CI5 CIVIL DETAIL 2 Clb 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN IMPACT PLAN DEW ULL IM FINAL PLAT _ LLI LANDSCAPE PLAN dw ARCHr ECTURAL I SITE PLAN - I" _ 40' -0" A2 ARCHITECTURAL PLANS SITE 10 '00, ST 1 -494 v SHEET INDEX T1 COVER SHEET CML CID TOPOGRAPHIC 5URVEY CLI GEOMETRIC AND PAVING PLAN CI] GRADNG DRANAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN CL3 UTILITY PLAN CIA CIVIL DETAIL 1 CI5 CIVIL DETAIL 2 Clb 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN IMPACT PLAN PRELIMINARY PLAT FINAL PLAT _ LLI LANDSCAPE PLAN ARCHr ECTURAL At SITE PLAN - I" _ 40' -0" A2 ARCHITECTURAL PLANS A3 BUILDNG ELEVATIONS �L PROJECT TEAM DEVELOPER: FraLi *Kh Companles 612/029.3480 1101 Weet l8 th St. FAX 612/896 -2311 Bloomington, MN 55349 John B. Donnelly GENERAL CONTRACTOR. Kraus- Anderson Constructlon Co. FAX 612/332 --1139 525 South 8th St. Mlnneapolls, MN. 55404 Keith Baleke Project Manager Mark Coudron vloe President ARCHITECT. RSP Architects, Ltd 612/339 -0313 t2c Fl— Avenue North FAX 612/339-6160 Fll.neapoib, I'll —te 55401 Rich.,d varda Principal -In- Charge Steve Maurelll Project Manager John Larson project Arc ltect VERTICAL T17ANSPORTATION Lerch Batas North America Inc- 612/413 -1985 l06 2nd Ave. South Suite b6m FAX 612/413 -1340 Mlnneapolts, YM 55402 Bob Lelbrock I ANDSCeI¢ ARCHITECT, Damon Farber Assoctatas, Irlc. 612 /332 -'1522 253 3rd Ave. South FAX 6 93 12/332 -06 Minneapolis, MIN 55415 Damon Farber MEC4 ANICAL/ EI Er TRICAt Er.Ir:NEEP, Lundquist, Killeen, Potvin s Bender, Inc, 612/E29.3480 1935 tU County Road 152, Suite 300 FAX 612/633 -1355 St. Paul, MN 5 5113 -212 2 Rick Rustad Project Electrical Engineer Linda A;4nson, PE. Project Mechanical Engineer aTR=TLJ el -IVI •IN R. Clark Ertgtneerlrp Corp. 612/545 -9196 621 Lllec Drive Rorth FAX 612/541 -0056 Minneapolis, MN. 55422 Michael Fowler Structural Engines Tom Cesare Civil Engineer C�k&" I h.'v a.nuy U..t Y . iw ., .p..rn..ats. « /w.bto ra. w Ir r tti suu er tvw�w. IY.b" uon Na. Data F�alta la. FRAUENSHUH COMPANIES P,.JM N. 6361.003.00 Dra.n Clip CP.d.e 4 Data not¢ nr a�yw rwnr ra a�ee.d r.rn P- rcL .1 ba.bl ew4• Aq.o, ..n .�:. ttia, r. p.v- prb.oy «pens w ret. e w p... we...pre...u« p.• .I..Ip- M IT MWIC. LIG ltr.....nnr.b b M1- s.a rov.e- u.., COVER SHEET T1 p., 1--:; w 33- Z w Rm nNo MAIL It OL z9v Ell LINE U .2. if;, TILL: WTANINC VIALIL . . ... ... ... .... . . 14.13' ........... 0 I 3k- PROPOSED PARKING RAMP 1. 2 u 1110, VA 100 & X. 3 ok 3 11ftk STATE LAW: 48 HOURS BEFORE EXCAVATING OR DEMOLISHING BUILDINGS, CALL (651) 454-0002 FOR FIELD LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES. (THIS SERVICE LOCATES UTILITY, OWNED LINES BUT NOT PRIVATE LINES) THE LOCATIONS OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY AND HAVE NOT BEEN INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED. THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES MUST BE DETERMINED BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. 11010 0.11 oor PROPOSED OFFICE TOWER OF . POND KEYED NOTES METED WO ARE DENGTED U1❑ON THE MAX DISMAL HANDICAP PLANING SIGN PER DETAIL /OA EMTEFLY MOU SON IS TO HANG 'AN ACCCSSBLr SUN ATTACKED. O TERMINATE 0612 C0*CREIIE CUIM AND GUTTER AT STRUCTURE. PRONVIE commom "IT AT CONIHIC110M. MATCH NOV CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER INTO OWNG IF FRONTAGE RWO WORK 6 COAPLETED OT MOM COORDINATE ALL WORK WITH THE CITY OF EDINA AND MINNESOTA DEPAITTMENT OF TRAPISPONTATICIMIL O VISUAL, ONE EAMUIMCZ PER CITY Or OW SWOMIDS AND opmFICATIM MATCH W13N WWNM M CONCRETE RANIP M A OMM TnmmnML NO AlRUPr TRWRTHIG WILL ft ALLOWEDL vot" DACE LOCATION OF ENTIVINCES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCIIDL IJREPER TO ARIOVECKIRAIL RAMS AND SPECVICATUMIS FOR DECORKIRIE CONCRETE RNTERM,, CDIM HATMNG AM GROSS SECTION. WEER TO IRRUCTURYAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR WARNING KAU. INSIALL STDP SIGN PER CITY OF WIN, SPIN1111105 AND SPECIFICATIONS. N W*E S SCALE: 1" = 30' LEGEND: (PROPOSED SYSTEM GEOMETRIC AND PAVING GENERAL NOTES 1. THE ODDER SHALL VISIT THE SITE PRIOR TO BIDDING TO UNDERSTAND THE SCOPE OF WORK. NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION WILL BE ALLOWED FOR ITEMS THAT COULD HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED 13Y A SITE VISIT, STUDYING THE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY, THOROUGHLY REVIEWING ALL PLANS AND GEOTECHNIrAL REPORT AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED FOR CLARF1CATION PRIOR 70 BIDDVa 2. SITE MUMNSIONS ON THIS PLAN SMALL BE USED ROPE ALL LAVOLIT WORK. PAIING, SOVINAM CUMS AND WHIM R)MHED SURFACE FEATL963 ARE INCLUDED. AS SHOWN. 3. REFER TD ARCHITECTURAL PLAICI MR PJLDM LAYOU1. IL ALL DIMENSIONS WO3. PAMEMENT IBM EMJ ARE 10 FINGE Or CUM I".= Nam OrIERIMIL S. REFER 70 SIMUCTUPAL PLAN IDIR CONCRETE SEDOP INFORMATION. & ALL NOV CURB NO GLITTER ON PRIMW PROPENTIF SHALL NE MIR a)m:wm cum AND conuL 7. CONTRACTOR 6 70 COORDINATE ALL WORK WITH UMM AM ORADING CONTRACIORIL & NOV IMIUMUNDUS IS TO BE PER DEMS ME SMIRCATIONS. IN. RDPEP 10 SURWEY FOR INDLINGRAY AND MVOMAPHIC WORWINTION. EILILDING AND PAWNG SHALL K LAID On ON LOT 111' A REGISTERED LAND SURVEML 10. ALL SIDEWMJIS SMALL hNWE POSITNE SLOPE AMT FROM THE BUILDING. THE CROSS SLOPE SWU BE AT A MIN. Or IAN AND THE mkxmm SmAL K 2AM THE INOXOM LONGITUDINAL SLOPE ON SIDEPAIM SIALL U 5AL 11. ALL PAVEMENT STRIPING SHALL U •• UM UNLESS OniMM N1Tm 12. ALL wow vnmN PLax woo-ar-luor sw.LL courom TO crtr SPECIRGAINNIS. PAMONG IIATA' 20 REGULAR STALLS 0 RANKING LOT Ur,,MI9LL,rk,S.rALL&P, 2"'Na LOT 060 REGULAR STALLS 14 PARKING RAW 10 ACCESSIBLE STALLS 14 PARKING RNMP 2 VAN" ACCESSIBLE WALL IN PARXING RAP TWAL SIALLS UNDER LDM Sol 703 TWAI. MOM IRALUI 'M-BACK REOLAREMEMM FRONTAGE F400 BUILDINIM. W. PARKIND: 25; SIDE AND REAR: ..a,& g- R'N"M AM. lam TO PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR ADWONAL b"AMATION • OR RUNDING HEIGHT IF GREATER iRSP Architects, Ltd. 120 First Ave N Mp1s, MN 55401 Fax by 339 6160 Ph b12 339 0313 —.I-- 01 U. DA, NIi ENGINEERING 9 50 CORPORATION (6121541-=Fo FRAUENSHUH COMPANIES NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Co 11`0101 Na CEC C99155 0'.— obj DRL CF—k.d es TIC obte 11 1ANUARY 2000 JAN. D. 2000 CITY su3mrrrAL HWY 169 & 494 OFFICE TOWER GEOMETRIC AND PAVING PLAN C1. HANDICAPPED PARKING SKIN DOLL ARD NUMBER OF PARKING SUMLS KETED ROLE CUM AM OLITIM WMAWROVIRLM. RAN PROHMITED PARKING LIGHT Ow OnLqLWA PINVEMM mmy DUN onmen pmnw GEOMETRIC AND PAVING GENERAL NOTES 1. THE ODDER SHALL VISIT THE SITE PRIOR TO BIDDING TO UNDERSTAND THE SCOPE OF WORK. NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION WILL BE ALLOWED FOR ITEMS THAT COULD HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED 13Y A SITE VISIT, STUDYING THE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY, THOROUGHLY REVIEWING ALL PLANS AND GEOTECHNIrAL REPORT AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED FOR CLARF1CATION PRIOR 70 BIDDVa 2. SITE MUMNSIONS ON THIS PLAN SMALL BE USED ROPE ALL LAVOLIT WORK. PAIING, SOVINAM CUMS AND WHIM R)MHED SURFACE FEATL963 ARE INCLUDED. AS SHOWN. 3. REFER TD ARCHITECTURAL PLAICI MR PJLDM LAYOU1. IL ALL DIMENSIONS WO3. PAMEMENT IBM EMJ ARE 10 FINGE Or CUM I".= Nam OrIERIMIL S. REFER 70 SIMUCTUPAL PLAN IDIR CONCRETE SEDOP INFORMATION. & ALL NOV CURB NO GLITTER ON PRIMW PROPENTIF SHALL NE MIR a)m:wm cum AND conuL 7. CONTRACTOR 6 70 COORDINATE ALL WORK WITH UMM AM ORADING CONTRACIORIL & NOV IMIUMUNDUS IS TO BE PER DEMS ME SMIRCATIONS. IN. RDPEP 10 SURWEY FOR INDLINGRAY AND MVOMAPHIC WORWINTION. EILILDING AND PAWNG SHALL K LAID On ON LOT 111' A REGISTERED LAND SURVEML 10. ALL SIDEWMJIS SMALL hNWE POSITNE SLOPE AMT FROM THE BUILDING. THE CROSS SLOPE SWU BE AT A MIN. Or IAN AND THE mkxmm SmAL K 2AM THE INOXOM LONGITUDINAL SLOPE ON SIDEPAIM SIALL U 5AL 11. ALL PAVEMENT STRIPING SHALL U •• UM UNLESS OniMM N1Tm 12. ALL wow vnmN PLax woo-ar-luor sw.LL courom TO crtr SPECIRGAINNIS. PAMONG IIATA' 20 REGULAR STALLS 0 RANKING LOT Ur,,MI9LL,rk,S.rALL&P, 2"'Na LOT 060 REGULAR STALLS 14 PARKING RAW 10 ACCESSIBLE STALLS 14 PARKING RNMP 2 VAN" ACCESSIBLE WALL IN PARXING RAP TWAL SIALLS UNDER LDM Sol 703 TWAI. MOM IRALUI 'M-BACK REOLAREMEMM FRONTAGE F400 BUILDINIM. W. PARKIND: 25; SIDE AND REAR: ..a,& g- R'N"M AM. lam TO PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR ADWONAL b"AMATION • OR RUNDING HEIGHT IF GREATER iRSP Architects, Ltd. 120 First Ave N Mp1s, MN 55401 Fax by 339 6160 Ph b12 339 0313 —.I-- 01 U. DA, NIi ENGINEERING 9 50 CORPORATION (6121541-=Fo FRAUENSHUH COMPANIES NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Co 11`0101 Na CEC C99155 0'.— obj DRL CF—k.d es TIC obte 11 1ANUARY 2000 JAN. D. 2000 CITY su3mrrrAL HWY 169 & 494 OFFICE TOWER GEOMETRIC AND PAVING PLAN C1. PROPERTY LINE - . •- .. ' .. .. ^ . ... - ..... :. l .:: t- J �ERMm EDOE _ S NEIIMID 1 T j �r'" Rxi p` D• t� 1. LL _ . -. ,. _, .•. ....... .... .. a PRQpOSE6 - , .. ,.EKING - T RAMP \� I "`' �... `PROP 0 ED OFFICE \ FOWE.R 9 a $ 1 00 , J :1.> \ \ 1 ._ _. I •r_ �'��L\ a: rr I Cie �-Jy -o [R;r._ r.. �. N, < M` ---1 s _ - STATE LAW: 48 HOURS BEFORE EXCAVATING OR DEMOLISHING BUILDINGS, CALL (651) a 454 -0002 FOR FIELD LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES. (THIS SERVICE LOCATES ^� UTILITY OWNED LINES BUT NOT PRIVATE LINES.) _ THE LOCATIONS OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ARE SHOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY AND HAVE NOT BEEN INDEPENDENTLY VERIFIED. THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL UTILITIES MUST BE DETERMINED BEFORE COMMENCING WORK. N W * E S SCALE: 1° - 30' LEGEND: (PROPOSED SYSTEM) CATt70ASN MAMCLE/WC1S,49N A FINED DO SECTION �y SPOT ELEVATUN (LAST TWO mGTTs AND TODD Ep Immm TOTE � DCTR p6flENCE MIROFA CIA t-- GRAMME RDN DOWTION RUAREM NAIL OONTOR ETLvmm SUM MINOR DRNNRE MuFDor 04M PROOOSm SPOT ETAYARO S FOR FRONTAGE ROAD WERAMD EDGE ® ROCN CONSTIRICDO/ ENOMNGE G NERe� I NOTES: 1. THE BIDDER SHALL VISIT THE SITE PRIOR TO BIDDING TO UNDERSTAND THE SCOPE OF WORK NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION WILL BE ALLOWED FOR ITEMS THAT COULD HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED BY A SITE VISIT. STUDYING THE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY. THOROUGHLY REVIEWING ALL PLANS AND GEOTECHNICAL REPORT AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED FOR CLARIFICATION PRIOR TO BIDDING. 1 POW TO COMIGNMMON OF GRAMM . TW SLWION FIENCE, RINUO OONSTINMON ENRANd9 NO SEDIMENT FLIER SIMLL IE NSINIM 3. WETLAND EDGE IS TO BE STAKED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. WETLAND AREA IS NOT TO BE DISTURBED AT ANY TIME. ,L R1E OmRRACWR B TO RONhE ALL SEOMEIO FROM THE PCM AT THE DID OF CONRONL9IW WTER stR10WOING SMfACES ARE MARIAM) AND Im70RE TO GROWL RN DB}TL L E19T OLYATIOS II411101100 AB MA FOR IDAAPIL ARE U4DERS II00 70 MEAN 8302 L NO CIA= SLOPES SAIL EI® i1 01OR®MTAL TO NRIN'AL) LN{ES NOTED OTIERom 7. PROPOSED CONTOURS AND SPOT EEEMRIOIS AE TO FORMED OVAL L SPOT D,LVATIONS SORN AOMCDIT M Rea ETID TO CURER LINE (1C - TOP OT CURS). S. L19E CEDIEROC AND PAM SITE RAM FOR SITE UYOAT. . 1L ALL COMICTINI MINT OOULY IIFFN APR1GaE COOS ND ORDINATE 11. MAINTAIN AND REPAIR SILT FUJ= ROOK CWISrMJCOON ENIIIWOID AM QpRpO FUM (MCUIEO SILT IENVOL) UNTL COtSTRIXON B COPlETED NO NEW 1IE$URON AND SURFACING ARE ESIAM19ED. 1L MANTAN AGMCOR STEERS CLEAN OF ON AM DEBRIS ON A OALY atSTL 13. ALL ROP ISORN SEYIED 1110 BE OASS D Lft= NOW UTHOr AL 14. ALL AREAS OWUNBD DUMC CONSTRUCTION 94ML OF RESTORED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. ANY IIE7S TIMT IMOE BEEN FNOTI GRAM AND AREAS TIOT 116E ®1 DLTURBD. BUT 140E NO ALINE MAIM SOUL BE S ®m AND NLLZII D RERAN 14 DAYS ALL MULCM M4TERML STALL BE 0=0 INTO TIE: SOL N A OREMON PERPODDULN TO THE SIDRMNATER RON DAN SUCH AREAS SiDPES 3:1 OR STEEPER "T E EITIMN SEEDED AM LTM7ED OM N EROSION BAHIET P ODIM OR 11111.0E11 IIIM A TAONYEO AEM MaHm 11141 DBOO THE KLCK IL USN COEPIETION OF THE PROX= AND STABLUAITION OF ALL GRADED AREAS. ALL MIPONN/ EROSION CONTROL FACLOF3 (SLR FD10S' MAY BAILS. ERG) SAIL E BOWED FRBN SOL 1L ALL PLAN REORSINS MIST E S MCM 70 71[ CITY OF EDEM FOR APPRWK. KEYED NOTES: EYED NOTE AE DEOTm BY ❑GN THE RAW pj E GSTM 42' STORM SENER AM STDICTIARES E A NOF TO E DSTWISED DI PPT WHERE NUM ODOIWMTE R110ft TIE UWATON "" ETON TI[ UEUTY CONTRACTOR NO APPROPRIATE ACENQ9. O PROPOSED "IDN'DC NOW NORM m OIImO WILL E PERFUMED AT TIE SINE TARE N M PRaP05eD SITE NON, BT THIS CONTRAEM CONTRACTOR TOP THIS BD PAO{AGE 6 TO f OOROBMTE AIL ILL ARAN W CONTRACTOR RWAUAO TIE FRWTAE TOAD AND 83 IRONER pJ EPEE 10 BTBICNRAL PINS no wavrATNO ra TErmm Im" © PRIOR TO ANY VOW OR CMNSINKTON WWM EAST OF TIE PROPOSED BIMLDNL THE CONTRACTOR 0 TO OBTAIN N 01ODKNNENT POW FROM DE NINNEM DEPARTMENT OF TRN6POAIATON I] NO MORN IS PERMITTED, NTTHN TIE I® MGM. WM A POLAR B DBTANLD. p NO EAMHm= IS 10 0=0 W M 15 FEET OF 111E TONOL RSP Architects, Ltd. 120 First Ave N Mpl5, rM 55401 Fax 612 339 6160 R 612 339 0313 Lrvd Sn�ao�Y RI La. Die No ENGINEERING 4, gll l4 CORPORATION '61 .1 311 -Om4 fm �, FWBIKiPA Nm M4 I w . OLL. ICI,® RMeWK DgNDP MOW M u�9 p T.1 G.T[ O wE9G4 TIaM 4R �.� N.L. TIp.R 1 C6MNE FRAUENSHUH COMPANIES NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION C-1.1— Nm. CEC C99155 peon Ely DRL Gvclls�d By TIC Date 11 IANUARY 2000 R. I. 0 2000 CITY SUBMMAL HWY 169 & 494 OFFICE TOWER GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN C1.2 AIN. rfO /1 / 4 \ P J "• 10P 6438 \ ,� INERT ELEV. au.Sir., \ \� (BY OTHERS) STORM SEWER STRUCTURE TABLES STRUCTURE NUMBER PROPERTY UNE INVERT ELEVATION SIZE INCHES CASTING NEENAH UPSTREAM PIPE LENGTH. SQL, TYPE. SLOPE AND STRUCTURE NUMBER FES 01 N A I 831.00 15 N A 58 - 16 ROP O 2. 5 FROM BLOC _ .... _ ..._ ...... ..._....._ ...... ... 831.00 ce /. _ 00 - ISr ARCH RCP O 0.3 %. MH MN #3 e 1.4 _ a 413 R -1733 142 - 1B ARCH RCP O D3i, W gin `., PROPOSED E 831.92 W 872.12 9 `` PARKING CS 05 838.2 e RAMP R- 2535 55' - 12' RCP O 1.1111. CB 00 ..F BJ9.3 E 834.65 240B MH FES 7 N A _ s 42 A 42 - 42 RCP O 02x. MH \' 841.5 A PROPOSED R- 1733 58' - 42' RCP O D x. DUSTING FBI OFFICE \ \ \ •/ \ TOWER swriAA[ SEWTR NN lBY OTHERS) \ ' � \ 7 10 a'" 6 .• ❑1� \ 5 .•1I • 1�e 7 r eDLD-RO PVC ❑ FEY \ •i: f, ` • 1.175 w AIN. rfO /1 / 4 \ P J "• 10P 6438 \ ,� INERT ELEV. au.Sir., \ \� (BY OTHERS) STORM SEWER STRUCTURE TABLES STRUCTURE NUMBER TOP ELEVATION INVERT ELEVATION SIZE INCHES CASTING NEENAH UPSTREAM PIPE LENGTH. SQL, TYPE. SLOPE AND STRUCTURE NUMBER FES 01 N A I 831.00 15 N A 58 - 16 ROP O 2. 5 FROM BLOC FES 02 N/A 831.00 18 N/A 00 - ISr ARCH RCP O 0.3 %. MH MN #3 836.1) 5 83129 W &71.48 413 R -1733 142 - 1B ARCH RCP O D3i, W CB 4 835.5 E 831.92 W 872.12 R-3087 15e - 12 RCP O 1.1 %, MH CS 05 838.2 E 833.84 S 834.04 46 R- 2535 55' - 12' RCP O 1.1111. CB 00 CB p8 BJ9.3 E 834.65 240B R-7057 FES 7 N A 829.00 42 NIA 42 - 42 RCP O 02x. MH NH /B 841.5 W 829.OB E 828.08 SO R- 1733 58' - 42' RCP O D x. DUSTING FBI STATE LAW: 18 HOURS BUM ExuVAnNG OR DEMOUSHNG BUILDINGS. CALL (061) 45A-000I FOR RELD LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND LRUM ONES. (THIS SERVICE LOCATES UnU OWHED uNES BUT NOT PINATE ONO.) THE LOCATONS OF UNDEROROUND UnUTS ARE SNOWH N AN APPRONWTE NIT ONLY AND NAVE N07 BEEN 1T•pUYNDEHTLT VERRED. ME ENACT LOCATON O ALL UnLME2 MAST E DETERMINED BEFORE COMMENCING WORK may, 03 N W- - , E S SCALE: I" = 30' LEGEND: (PROPOSED SYSTEM) ■ uTCIBAAN • MANHO[/GTCIBA9M • r Aww END SECTION FIE HYDRAW j VALVE WITH BOX AM COVER Y POSE NOCATCIA VALVE ]❑ KEYED MOT 0E7AL RF7DROCE NLUA_ CIA - -l--�f STORM SEVERE �•t -•-!l� S1wMR1' SETTER }-F- YQDI MIN �--1- DRANDIE -- t-- - --i -- wRER MAN (BSA' OrdoM GENERAL UTILITY NOTES: 1. THE BIDDER SHALL VISIT THE SITE PRIOR TO BIDDING TO UNDERSTAND THE SCOPE OF WORK. NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION WILL BE ALLOWED FOR ITEMS THAT COULD HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED BY A SITE VISIT, STUDYING THE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY, THOROUGHLY REVIEWING ALL PLANS AND GEOTECHNICAL REPORT AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUESTED FOR CLARIFICATION PRIOR TO BIDDING. Z ALL LATER SEIM35 ARE TO ME A MMUV OF 7.5 FEET AD A WANUM E OS FEET OF C%VL MSNLN COVER MY CHANGE IF OEFLECFNG WATER SEEMCE ENDER URDE3 ALL VALVES ARE TO NONE 7S FEET 70 9.0 FEET O COVER S SHOULD NATO SERUM CONRLT WORN OMEN U711M. 06LECT WATER SERVICE DOWN TD PROVIDE A MINIMUM VERTICAL CLEARANCE OF 2 FELT BETWEEN BOTIOM OF UTILITY AND TOP OF WATERINBI FOLLOW ALL 10 FM STANDARDS AND MN DEPT. OF XDILTN STANDARDS FOR LRRFIV CROSLLS ♦ ALL WATER M7NICE MAIM TEES. CRO55® AND ODDS ARE TO BE WOOED AND MUST FIDOOD. • ALL WICH BASINS AIR TD PAM SEDIMENT FILTERS PER ®111. • ALL FLARED ED SELIOMS SHALL TINE RP RAP PER DEMI. 7. WATERMAN AND FRERIOS SHALL BE OP CLAW E2 PER CITY STANDARD WECRCAMIS. a SANITARY SEVIER DULL WE SW 35 Pv UNLESS NOIm OTHERWISE, 0. SWAY SEWER SERVICE B TO E NR TESTED PER GNY SINMDNDS AND SPE�IG7W1 UTILITY KEYED NOTES: KEYED NOTES AE OOOIED M 0 ON THE MAL SHB 16 BCH 1" S FELT FROM BULDWB AT IN EITT pZOTION a71Ia VERMV MW LOCATION AND INVERT EI EVATNN IWRI MOST CURRENT MECIN401L DBANNS PROM M CDNBINie LL 0 9118 B BOX PAC SAMIAWY SORS D FEET FROM BUILDING R NVDIR ELEVATION 530.70. VERIFY DNCM INVERT ELEVATION AND LOCATION WITH MOST ONI¢OT IaVIMBCAL ORAWD164 PRKO 10 OONSTR IC10N 90.55 4 NCH DOMESTIC HATER SFFEY MD a NON Few PROID.'fON w7m SERVE= LEES FEET FROM BUEDNG VEIFY DIACT LOCATION AND ELOWIDM VIM MOST CURRENT IRCHA N71 DRAWINGS PRIDE 10 COMSIWRTON. Q COOMCI INTO 017' SAMIDRY SEWER MAMICEE AT BEAM N 856.17. COORDBIAIE ALL WORN WITH CITY of EDNA AM FOUGW ALL CITY STANDARDS AND 6PECIRCMOB WADI N R81C RIEN-40E-01tl. O COMMON NEW 6 NCH OF WATER SERVICE 10 VALVE THAT TW BMW INSIM ID BY CRY OF EDNA PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION TIE IONTRALTOI B 70 CONTACT 1E CITY TO VERIFY DRAM LOWO1 AND TYPE OF C"UMN REQUIRED. FOLLOW ALL CRY OF EDIIM STA/DYOS AND SPEfIY.00NS WHEN WORONG N PUBLIC RIOIT-OF -LAY. ©MANTAN A MINIMUM OSTANCE OF 10 FEII BETWEEN M 0=061 SIODI SEWER MANHOLE AND RE NEW WWO Si7M@ CONfRAC10N B TO VEROY 7MAY 71E ALMIRMENT SHOWN ON THE PLAN ACCUR17E PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION a INSTALL B INCH N B NCH TEE IM W INCH W 4 Rol Rm11mA NORM AND W ROD T/RAI ROCK AM MEGNNG ALL COMECT1CIB. O INSTALL POST INDICATOR VAILE PER CITY OF EDNA STNDM OS AID SPEOEGMIS, UnUFF CONIWCI01 S RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AM ALL INNING THAI WAY E AS5900m METH THE P091 I DOBOR WLVL �R SMALL 4 NCH WE WAVf, RISM BELT AND Cd0. ® REMENE DIETING 42 NCH ROP STORM SLIER AND FLARED EM SECTION 70 THE DWNO NMPHNi CONNWT NOW U INCH INS STOP PPND TOM 100TNG MANHOLE AM CRAFT AND S M PER CITY O EDOM STANDARDS AM SPEfiTA7101Q �j Mfg TOP OF OBSTUXI MANHOLE CASTING TO ELEVNION 065.0. FDLLON ALL CITY 06 LOOM STAIOgG AND S[mGTIO6 ® RAW 70P OF DE O YMNNE CILSED To ELETWTW 86aL FOLLOW ALL OIV er EDBM 4APDVDS AM SPEOFGHO6 © CONTRACTOR B TO COORDINATE CROSSIIG OF PROPOSED SWIARY SEWER AND CRY VM70 MAIN. PRIOR 70 ANY DETERWIL PLUM INC N THE BUILDING BEING INSULLED. THE CONTRACTOR O 70 VERHY 7IMT THE PROPOSED 6 INCH SANITARY SEWER THAT WALL BE CROSSING 111E EXISTING 42 INCH STORY AND FEN 5 NCH WATER MAIN B FFASM PER PLAN. COORDINATE AWTH. THE CONSTRLICIM MAIMOER AND FOUW ALL DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH STANDARDS RSP Architects, Ltd. 120 First Ave N Mpls., MN 55401 Fax b12 339 blb0 Ph bU 33S 0313 lm�a s�npo� 621 Ux DAT NWO ENGINEERING (611(1H1H.9 „'"AE CORPORATION (612) 511 -M TW �. consY IwR'Ha ULAN HPD61 , W IwHT NWm.Rm R Na � Y N n DNfit SU.Om90. MO . ouY Lcn® NWTW6TmNa oa1NmN uNa RNA uwa N 1x1 TR.R o NHN.Nmon 1NMD fM PDnlm NIANHE 1NWlT 1 C14E Mrz RES b rNm1 FRAUENSHUH COMPANIES NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 0OWN1661_ No. CEC C99155 ;;,I ft GWCAMd ft OAK 11_IANUARY 2000 MMVWbO APE 12.20W CITY SUBMITTAL HWY 169 & 494 OFFICE TOWER UTILITY PLAN C1.3 VERMAL BEND � en•c[ Rw •uNxST YIO6TUNBfD fM1N BN.C[ RUG •f..i6F —� � 9LC xNODTIIIBCO FIAW - PLUGGED TEE PLUGGED CROSS �rr ///t\\ TEE 90 ' WON !>m 810019 AIE . ECTIO WDBTW9D T/RIIL 1 .RxONS f611U1F DON OF iNPUSI, ] . •u1 BF1T1NOS ro s1oBwL N W 0 tuPSx vEw g o-arIx l AE C O . x BEND Nnfgl E N TE VICE s. N E0MAN K05 ACD TEES 91EL eE IIRRT dOC'16D OO NEfxWfiD ,2 THRUST BLOCKS t.. xDT ,D svN[ I[ xrw Iwvac MNro II m a 9NR1 11nr M1 SOVVINOs OF, IDEA FR[ DEN—wT L6 POST INDICATOR VALVE (PM wr W SERE 1/2�i68M1 cP•DE U�P1� TO 69G16'P N) 7 3 E PLM ala 7 0— S1.WIIMDS aND R� ue TMIPm aw.B�E w.l•IIAC IILDOIO IIIO691IPBEB SOL w co P.C1m m ,DOS sDMO.NO P ffl DDISTT IIDim BCMFLL 91.11 WE D P• TO O lf/Sl 99 MM.owo `ro "" Dw3TT n Iwosr..sEn .w .t Tws PWAD M6.5 ON — s if[l O STMICRIE . Ce� RCP PIPE BEDDING NoT ro savE cw ,IE •L'Cf7I.e1[ ON SITE SOe 1T LLLl IIIT (fxlw m awPZL) CM1CVETL PvL TEs M soars) MP Mrao, sro. sort 31.x 1N•SN 4L•lO �� / illDm CDIWFCTIDN xrcn m�Mrmw � /•' Dr, ewLs dlnD TD N,vt o.6 / [L B•P lLTxwLT sP•vD) YENIS s(s NOTE is NDTL 1. TWO -U BOLT FL561IM TO BE 11 -EO M W E•CN IOWE, arE ON E—I eIX OF THE RE R ® FPW ML TOP O ME -L I •F1w r•BRIGOIw -NW w f VMe2[ R1, MWOET 1311. O. IPP1pYID EWML 5611 feM TIE[ CMS T V. 1. mT wom (I /e-1 ro a D IN OONCF6R AT WSaIJ.TIw. . M1 16 NIETS • OUT= slwu N•v[ TOSM C— MID RFE.G O R.C.P. FLARED END SECTION MES.) W/ TRASH GUARD 1. 101 TO SCME T T p� °I�pn >� I•� xWDm ws] 2 nrlw o T % e' TO E.• xxa /rorni yr m • gG B-B M.Pn PurJD M+D T•xRn •DCwMNE DIUNLM amrlo �wiw M�IETDNf ` u06TINBm BaL 06 rolmrrtB TO Dos sT•rm.ND PPOCrw ofxvtr Nom a•C Swu of —.TED TO •T Iwr ess St•xpMO PpOCm. Df16T IN I.MDSF — •16.e. row IN Pm .16A5 w — S FL[r w sift Um PIK IN ct 101 ro scw[ � ums5u® soL w colm•e1m m Irm sDV.Dwo PPacrw Dr1a9n NOIQ B.CfRLL SIWl i COINP.Cr N ro .l lUSf 9Si I= IN PPDnw Dl1 N N N 5 R. Of •RUCT 001 W P,WtD MEAS w OI11IM S R. Of SIRICNQ �D DUCTILE IRON PIPE BEDDING ,. INm ro SOLE T BRw CW RO „ IRRIGATION SLEEVE UNDER BTIUMINOUS PAVEMENT WO,roVc A RFW AT RCP 0=08 1 r1 2 I rte 1 W /001 naT, TTPC . D RIPRAP AT RCP OUTLETS Nar m sfJ6[ 901 TO BL slDOm 1:11 TO DNMNLS STEP 1 S.— m TO wamN RwxD ,S. P•DIO SECTION A—A srp (nn. T IulESS W V.R, PN a G x.MNRE P[FTA TO wmm u RIR ,ASTINO KOTU.•TION Y —IFTDO RR6 MOTE: dP m w /•OOI{>aTE NOTUN[ NEE I WNCS. IIR IOIES . IM4Aa PRLO oONwvE sLC1ON . CONCRETE s•mE[ 9w1 BE —m MEND TE .OAbTIID POGS MR S NOf, HOWEVER E•Id TIE DwOETE OeOUF OLIVE.ON ME GINS wan VCR MO OwNNE S Y Ba1WE SI —ENEO WOOD POST •PPPOlLD QoiLNTEE r.M - w r.BteD W muOx B•CFRLL I F. . ,. sosr maxD swu .rn Leau . r¢T 2 NxT6:TE[ r•aDC SNMl B[ -LIN.f1• TYR OP MOIOYm WIN. ] m,11CN S0 Q AIDE 6 e eNO® DEFP BT B eKNES WIDE 0 SILT FENCE CONSTRUCTION ,. WroVOL NDTL NWTI, — DONe1M r omlW[O ON RIN E 1 NOT TO SCRE MrW 2 suv[s FFD 96F �■ COIV.c1m mE —NOW WE m sPLHII7BRIO M r OF, SfDWQN/ [� RIfRD N•1G \ � GTCM BL41 TIUPIO c MVCTIdI Rlli MM FAW BLTLm1 (w5O1D •lO iT•IE RMOd FLTEP FM Ml O1 SUMOI.IUIi SD1,fKE r,r5 EITND BfDN P•Im w tEOMT6x IPa ®. [ST.WI9ED. SEDIMENT FILTER AT CATCH EOSIN , j!5 DI ,1.8E PTECLST CONCRETE E= 1 ,N—S wu von Pm I^ STANDARD 48' MANHOLE OR CATCH BASIN c1 Im ro sFJ6E Pvf11 TO nw. sce fAtTeO WraPe4Tlw wTE ro B 2' TnDE arTrn w•UL aDPE GIT O M W HE CA FIG SOE w 8•SX Y •auSFWO NI16 IQIxFOPCCD CDxwC1E IEIFA TO SCxmINE Fw wIC1AwS S-E Br1ON 1' PER R. —WED w —T GWNG[R am RSP Architects, Ltd. 120 First Ave N Mpls., MN 55401 Fax 612 339 6160 Ph 612 339 0313 621 U. OM NNM ENGINEERING Y.v.mdl' W WO•N 612 SE1 -M CORPORATION I S•I -OA6 Fa YKT[BT 0 T ", INS N N. ERCI ". w IQH)IE e PRPMED W WE w DlOpi Nf DeEGr DM19(M .ED TW I NN A °III EIIfHO OR0165OfEy ONi[[A LIM ME — O ME —a OF INESOT. >Trm w INMIFp rfeC Dae P[a w FRAUENSHUH COMPANIES NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION COI ]W— N0. CEC C99155 Pr— ON DRL Ch-k d ON TIC Pete 11 IANUARY 2000 ROVIeIOR JAK 12 209DO CITY SUBMMAL HWY 169 & 494 OFFICE TOWER CIVIL D ETAI LS # 1 C 1 o4 66,2 ,aRB uD amm PuN DYEASONs SIOPC 1 /.' Pm fOm A,e W fKf R OUIa _ o o °o 0 o 0 o 0 o e• o °o °o 0oc000000 °o °o 'o 0 0 o °o a °o °o °o °a° °o °o °o °o °o a °D o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00000 0000000000 0°0°0°000°0°0 E'MY O 000 °O 0 O O °O° °00000 COVFA ClASS'S ° °O °O °O °000 O °000 000 °0 O /UR[UW BIZ< 0 O O MIEA[ SP @Rm W PIAM$ USE DRNwrac Ew SPFOfIG1,Ox DIT]0 ,. aRamN a mw5vm1T amTm aoPE ro , WT •BECTON Of •DNSLM PAYLWNT SLOPE 1 LYN6TRLTn — — 11f1W IN /R910,xGS .. . LM10, 51:mws•, n 8812 TR CURB AND GUTTER WARAINE t Nor ro wEC RIR„G COARSE PEA UN /00T 2350. "K LV Ib CMl RA YN/DOI =7 A,z,eurt rlw, WTYMPD[ m L v O /aCL1RRY FL Pim F Yx/•m 21DD. 1lm Og OE -rom e--O PN00'IOR OEE6rIT. e• RRL cv Suw T n —NG /200 Sm. LM COLirCi[D To M S WD PROn•R •rxvTr. Y LeY TO TO a E D R[ODYPKT BINNA•OF R LEAST ,Oat SIN,OVIO PROCTOR rnmrr_PRaY ROLL Pm YN/OOi 21,1 . n HEAVY -DUTY BRUMINOUS PAVEMENT t xm W sulY - - -- •VAK 0aN6E PEA „N/M 2= lYP[ lY wx COAT PER YN/D01 zw AOGNL,6 RM ,.m =m PEA YN/ m zm ' 1,,1.nEn� -111 -g M TvP[ Lv E,r�6u1E LEAST ,Oat ST a D PROCTOR 0060Y. cLLW e'A,o rm1 l® TNM ]] PASS,O ISm wo OOVPKrm TO T(. SGWw10 PROCfa Doett. J. isn Y,o RfOOYP/°T s„x+uDE J At LEAST WR SINIaJOt OOT 21, lIf2IDI, -PRODf le%1 PER YX/DOr Y, 1, NOi HT -D ••r OrrUMINOUS PAVEMENT b W « 1/e- nm PLAT[ AI W. SLOB DOWN, RIO w SOB NN STAR SU Ift.3" — LLGEOD x,0 -MM ON i c W N ROML BRIT Rvt[nw2m 12' VAN —Solt su W POST s APpXAOz TS .• , , zml S— TUBL leT sfcvlw,DN sECnaN 02M0) Roe C•NGxaf accuRl •, erec USf wE L Y 4rANSOx ,YEOerL Am uR[T, ,a, S SURFACE .• LONO mm R4D ., mwmm PO,NIS e- ON Goem coxcmrf WE OtM ARrA PJCEMENT + Tn P SIGN AND POST CI xm TO stvY RSF Architects, Ltd. 120 First Ave N Mpls., MN 55401 Fax b12 339 blb0 Fh 611339 0313 -4— al Ll. Du ftb ENGINEERING ell219 Y CORPORATION (512) 541 -OMB Fa i ,Olm/ Cm1YY TYT 1,6 PIAIf IISOI,aTYR OP xOVlf ,W PxViND to M[ P u� ®N NRi 91aaOU .�Ne „YT , w . OLLT IJQ,LIIL P,p�pPf I,EdQA ut0, ne „N] O M ZIYE O YwCW. a wsam ,LYo e+6 Rm N6 FRAUENSHUH COMPANIES NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Coinnleelon 140. CEC C99155 [> By DRL 0' TIC Dato 11 IANUARY 2000 4ZSYIRIOr,e AAL 12 2dWV CITY SUBnrTT HWY 169 & 494 OFFICE TOWER CIVIL DETAILS #2 C1.5 R6F Architects, Lt. . 120 First Ave N MP 5, MN 55401 Fax 612 339 6160 Ph 612 339 0313 Q.a ae 8 ff"T ' -r5. W'�22 ((61 59196 CORPORATION (6174 50-0056 Fm 1 NEA®i tD1TFY f T 116 I . -era a PCPDRf W llpJ:aS F YC A 9reP r 64L7 SUAR.6a AIO Trani 1 Jr . DLL• rwvem9rRt ocIRrJ71 1NpT11 M Vae d M su11 w t[ OF I.r.1[sab rw a _+ ANC "-a J. rnwe ogre !m Ya 7)031 FRAUENSHUH COMPANIES C -1-189 No. 0,8- 59 DRL C -k,..d Dy TIC Date 11 JANUARY 2000 R1.18 1 Ja7t n. 2mmm CITY a mmITTAL JAN. 25. 2000 CITY RESUMBITTAL HWY 169 & 494 OFFICE TOWER 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN IMPACT PLAN C1.6 F-IVND EDGE - 9_: NOTE ' 8]1.1 9s,.e V 950.. 930.7 PROPCRi'I UNE S 89'0.8'54" E - 1080.6i Lycnd c5_me BFCE- 70" ' Eat 1.1ETLO.ND rU%p b3C.] 1 �75-'0o� � 6T.6 ID CFV'.R L'YE Or 'o r! L'a3 e_ ] - �, 83.. ✓` X31,2 83,.7 CEr:TLi LYE OF PCWEP :WES N. S. FOse Rtert P JOjo2 LccvTER UNE OF SOWER U'Yf5 75 -r „ o..t N. S. P. Eosement per Doc. - 36 56= Ono - ' -0026 ' � 6312 � Nl.i � � Nos. 3644604, 3656125 Ord 363625 -, fiIE wA • yb-a - tv' I 235 63A, B a 'p`�; -- \ST -101 \ \gyp -- \ � - B. g�3 v' 1 t7. 2 -, 2. • 2• a33.9 8]1.2 1 '830.6 100 -YEP.R FLOOD ZONE \MOOCC \ \ ARJ, FROP@SED s -103 yQ �_ lJag 5� -: o' b ..2 .. i•lil \\ \ `/ 11` \ r\\ \ \ =`KIN 637 Z 1 "-`� \\ u \ �6.2\ 12•© 7fi ®e.. \ \ / cc ,0 \\ e3a.L,2-\ - II �i L roc \ \� J 0 \ 1'iETLAND a VERI -1 , �jb /_` \ \ \� /�'\ 4✓ lY �� \ 831. G � ai p •� `7 \ \ \ • .\ \ _ _ r.lr L' �. ` \� \`PROPOSED Y'EMV] EDGE S' NOTE z 932s e� 4y 4lis/ /' bbb "� - ! w) OFFICE 1� T WER s)_•o g Q 232 et:.e / oJ° 632.9 / \B \ SCALE: T' ao' \�/, /� ^pp����FO P�) . °' •1`\\\. �y \ �i✓ \\ \ F.F.E. 841.00 fj 837.5 \ a]r��t 2�•) // / ® ` / \\ O 'Oew %( (!� /.•. OC \. -t - lab 932.9 15323� W o `O .<• \ QTjsji'.D wO° 07 a 9 \� _ / / �t.7 1 BJI.S C 100 -YEAR FLOOD 20NE \ o I S.0 / 5 \ 1 _ 12' / , 1 x32.6 - r ,, 6 sf -106 ,. Poncing Eosement Porcel 406, MND07 ,; 1 Right- Of -woy Piet No. 27 -102 I 'At, 91..7 a31.7 E2 53.6 6 POND -,-a p OOj \ N bh(. D 6� a ✓s\ 4a?6 / - �b ev STS Wn1Ea Z 830.0 I NOKYBCR, 1999 I ., I es:.7 Lrl _ 0\ c eST-119 N 11 I .0 I / 9]1.9 - / 83331 1 MIA 832.3 / eJl.v 1 UND- RWATLR 132.5 1p6 � ? dnjp pr DufLEr -- e REC. INJ. e2..e � Se9 .S; I WETLAND 8319 0 I /\ ' 933. P 671.9 631A 031.9 l - all . v 1 <D 100 -YEAR FLOOD ZONc 832.0 �i 1 l _ /41T�� } �\` 2 aSr.4jc � 833.7 YAODEO AREA / I 1 _� � - - -�U22 -� 817.5 / \e \ \ �� / b�• �J�'7 ��1.9V �u \ \\ � 63,15 13i- 638 I . �9Y (PROPOSED SYSTEM) ..2 2 � 5 63\ �i \ \ \ 1.4 �. _ 939.0 \ \ eaa 833.8 \\ \O8i4 \ ) ev2. Q4 39 a]Gw l Urn Pa a3o Don7alw ESFVA710R jJ 78TH 837. e. oP ��\ \ \a\ �'E31 e]t.6 ��a��� =_`� STREET . / 1BSa15n \ IS3p ® 100 YR. FLOOD PLAIN RPACT AIEA g35j 3S eD 839.9 p2! ?). \ / e• WOODED AREA 10 M IMPACT RCi39ENT AREA - ® 0 YR. FLOOD RA [P1A 8 � _i g3T to-' sa e0 91 p bJ6A 036.7 J'7�Y tb�nuo 3,59 Sq X37 1 ' 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN DATA ?c 96Q eJ7.0 ' ,o' 8 RRUYINOO9 Ae ' . 838 2 a R ''Y �`�' 100 YEAR FLOOD ELEVATION: ELEVATION 632 no IMPACT AREA DUE 1'0 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION: 6.760 SQUARE FEET (0.16 ACRES)e pOC X'4 °�C B�oeo' o oW •--_- __- U7 N 89'01'37' E s 0 AVERAGE DEPTH OF FILL TOVOLLUME OF FILL IN THE IMPACTED AREA Ot 3 0 CUBIC FEET (0.031 ACRE -FEET) 7gJ> 6)ey°JO po e fore �� g3T rsn.e7 150.50 ,r FO3•em . ;b men/ eJ6.9 12' WN PROPOSED REPLACEMENT AREA: 3,100 SQUARE FEET (0.16 ACRES) 1- BJB.19 i0• SAM - er /. REC. Inv. eSO.e D SNV INRU S0 YN AVERAGE CUT BELOW ELEVATION 832: 0.7 FEET 8 VOLUME OF CUT BELOW ELEVATION 832: 2,200 CUBIC FEET (0.051 ACRE -FEET) . PER --G R6F Architects, Lt. . 120 First Ave N MP 5, MN 55401 Fax 612 339 6160 Ph 612 339 0313 Q.a ae 8 ff"T ' -r5. W'�22 ((61 59196 CORPORATION (6174 50-0056 Fm 1 NEA®i tD1TFY f T 116 I . -era a PCPDRf W llpJ:aS F YC A 9reP r 64L7 SUAR.6a AIO Trani 1 Jr . DLL• rwvem9rRt ocIRrJ71 1NpT11 M Vae d M su11 w t[ OF I.r.1[sab rw a _+ ANC "-a J. rnwe ogre !m Ya 7)031 FRAUENSHUH COMPANIES C -1-189 No. 0,8- 59 DRL C -k,..d Dy TIC Date 11 JANUARY 2000 R1.18 1 Ja7t n. 2mmm CITY a mmITTAL JAN. 25. 2000 CITY RESUMBITTAL HWY 169 & 494 OFFICE TOWER 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN IMPACT PLAN C1.6 N PRELIMINARY PLAT W—T-E BRAEWOOD PARK SECOND ADDITION S SCALE: 1' = 50' 70virm '7' F.F.E.' 841.00 7 STO y 7 07 0.8' HT 9 HEIGHT aI YR POND EDGE nduy Easement Parcel 406, MNDOT Right .1-Zy Plot No. 27-ID2 4• and D,aT�ge ann,111, .Z., 4± j - - - - - - - - - - - /-N' n -f. Utity and Di.g. En.aren WETLAND EDIdt""' F;It 7�V. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Lot I except the easterly 175 feet thereof. Block 1. Broewood Park, L 0 �T, according to the recorded plot thereof. Hennepin County. Vinnewto; together with that part of the weal 78th Stem, vacated, in said Block 1. which ties westerly of the west line. and the extension thereof, at \ low Easterly 175 fact at lot 1. PROPOSED OWNER/DEVELOPER ORF Holdings LLC Canto Ict: John Donnelly WEST 7101 West 78th Street. Suite 100 NOTE: Bloomington. Minnesota 55439 To bring existing weements Into conforTilty, with aft (612) 829 348o development, It Is proposed to vacate the following; (VACATED) --Underlying platted easements created by plat of Bra PRESENT OWNEM Pork. zzL_... City of Edina --A utility and drainage easement am the eoat 10 feel of site. par Doc. No. 145662L AREAS Is- J ts Lot I - 452.029.73 sq. It. - 10.39 Acres --A sidewalk and biltaway easement over the southerly 15 feet of site and along the perimeter at vacated Lot 2 - 105.807.18 sq. ft. - 2.42 Arras N wol'sr E r" treat 7ath Street. pw Doc. No. 1437667. ZONING Necessary drainage and utility waserneeft are to be dadicatied . . . ..... .. Existing POD-1 or ra-dedIcatad In the plot of Braswood Park t Proposed POD-2 S ... d Addition. New sidewalk and bikeway oaseinnent(sN If required, are to be created by separate docurraidta. fRSP Architects, Ltd. 120 First Ave N Mp1s• MN 55401 Fax R 339 6160 Ph R 335 0313 621 U. 01W Net, ENGINEERING CORPORATION (612) 541-0056 An .'t_ WA W FRAUENSHUH COMPANIES C-1.61- No. CEC C99155 Pre- 15ti QRL CF.ded N TIC D.ke 11 1ANUARY 2000 JAN. 12. 2000 C17Y SUBMITTAL HWY169 & 494 OFFICE TOWER PRELIMINARY PLAT 5 10-11 U11111 E =1 — — - - — K WETLAND EDGE '11 — — — — — — — — ......... — — — — — — — -- - — — — NOlt... P. - Em — — — — — per , Ow. DO 'YR FLOOD ELEVATJN_ ot, 4 2,ment Not, .36 6OS4 36 6 and 649628 r - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _-- .--- Z -. - --- 4 -PROPOSED AR P NG KI WET LAND 4.1 PROPOSED OFNCE -K IN, WETLAND EDGE 70virm '7' F.F.E.' 841.00 7 STO y 7 07 0.8' HT 9 HEIGHT aI YR POND EDGE nduy Easement Parcel 406, MNDOT Right .1-Zy Plot No. 27-ID2 4• and D,aT�ge ann,111, .Z., 4± j - - - - - - - - - - - /-N' n -f. Utity and Di.g. En.aren WETLAND EDIdt""' F;It 7�V. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Lot I except the easterly 175 feet thereof. Block 1. Broewood Park, L 0 �T, according to the recorded plot thereof. Hennepin County. Vinnewto; together with that part of the weal 78th Stem, vacated, in said Block 1. which ties westerly of the west line. and the extension thereof, at \ low Easterly 175 fact at lot 1. PROPOSED OWNER/DEVELOPER ORF Holdings LLC Canto Ict: John Donnelly WEST 7101 West 78th Street. Suite 100 NOTE: Bloomington. Minnesota 55439 To bring existing weements Into conforTilty, with aft (612) 829 348o development, It Is proposed to vacate the following; (VACATED) --Underlying platted easements created by plat of Bra PRESENT OWNEM Pork. zzL_... City of Edina --A utility and drainage easement am the eoat 10 feel of site. par Doc. No. 145662L AREAS Is- J ts Lot I - 452.029.73 sq. It. - 10.39 Acres --A sidewalk and biltaway easement over the southerly 15 feet of site and along the perimeter at vacated Lot 2 - 105.807.18 sq. ft. - 2.42 Arras N wol'sr E r" treat 7ath Street. pw Doc. No. 1437667. ZONING Necessary drainage and utility waserneeft are to be dadicatied . . . ..... .. Existing POD-1 or ra-dedIcatad In the plot of Braswood Park t Proposed POD-2 S ... d Addition. New sidewalk and bikeway oaseinnent(sN If required, are to be created by separate docurraidta. fRSP Architects, Ltd. 120 First Ave N Mp1s• MN 55401 Fax R 339 6160 Ph R 335 0313 621 U. 01W Net, ENGINEERING CORPORATION (612) 541-0056 An .'t_ WA W FRAUENSHUH COMPANIES C-1.61- No. CEC C99155 Pre- 15ti QRL CF.ded N TIC D.ke 11 1ANUARY 2000 JAN. 12. 2000 C17Y SUBMITTAL HWY169 & 494 OFFICE TOWER PRELIMINARY PLAT BRAEWOOD PARK SECOND ADDITION KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That DRF Holdings LLC, a Minnesota limited liability corporation, owner and proprietor, and mortgagee of the following described property situated in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, to wit: Lot 1 except the Easterly 175 feet thereof, Block 1, Breewood Park, according to the recorded plet thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota; together with that P art of West 78th Street, vacated, in said Block 1, which lies westerly of the west line, and the extension thereof, of said Easterly 175 feet of Lot I Have caused the same to be surveyed and platted as BRAEWOOD PARK SECOND ADDITION and do hereby donate and dedicate to the public the easements for drainage and utility purposes as shown on this plat. In witness whereof said DRF Holdings LLC has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officers this day of . DRF HOLDINGS LLC By its By its STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of _ Y and of DRF Holdings LLC, a Minnesota limited liability corporation, on behalf of said limited liability corporation. Notary Public, My Conmission Expires County, Minnesota In witness whereof said has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officers this day of , By its By its STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of by and of _ __ , a on behalf of said Notary Public, County, Minnesota My Conxnission Expires I hereby certify that I have surveyed and platted the property described on this plat as BRAEWOOD PARK SECOND ADDITION; that this plat is a correct representation of the survey; that all distances are correctly shown on the plat in feet and hundredths of • foot; that all monuments have been correctly placed in the ground as shown or will be placed as required by the local governmental unit; that the outside boundary lines are correctly designated on the plat; and that there are no public highways to be designated on the plat. John V. Chaffee, Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 15228 ENGINEERING CORPORATION Ccn&dting Engl..e Lad S,rveyWO C.R. DOC. NO. STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing Surveyor's Certificate was acknowledged before me this day of by John V. Chaffee, Land Surveyor, Minnesota License No. 15228. Notary Public County, Minnesota My Commission Expires EDINA, MINNESOTA This plat of BRAEWOOD PARK SECOND ADDITION was approved and accepted by the City Council of Edina, Minnesota, at a regular meeting thereof held this day of A.D. If applicable, the written conments and recommenda- tions of the Commissioner of Transportation and the County Highway Engineer have been received by the City or the prescribed 30 day period has elasped without receipt of such comments.and recommendations, as provided by Minn. Statutes Section 505.03, Subd. 2. CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA, MINNESOTA , Mayor , Clerk TAXPAYER SERVICES DEPARTMENT, Hennepin County, Minnesota I hereby certify that taxes pa able in _ and prior years have been paid for land described on this plat. Dated this day of Patrick H. O'Connor, Hennepin County Auditor By Deputy SURVEY DIVISION, Hennepin County, Minnesota Pursuant to Minn. Statutes Section 363B.565 (1969), this plat has been approved this day of . Gary F. Caswell, Hennepin County Surveyor By REGISTRAR OF TITLES, Hennepin County, Minnesota I bereby certify that the within plat of BRAEWOOD PARK SECOND ADDITION was filed for record in this office this day of at o'clock _ M. Michael H. Cunniff, Registrar of Titles By , Deputy QWCrT 7 Mr 9 RHCCTR i I I 10 foot Utility and = Drainage Easement N31 I � s- n a Z W % Q O Z LLJ >- Q I' 0 ENGINEERING C0RP0RAT10N Con3dCug Ergo Lord Surveyors BRAEWOOD PARK SECOND ADDITION S 89 °08' 54" E WET LAW - - - - -- ------------------- 1080.61 ` 75 foot N S P. Easement per Doc. NOM 3644604, 3646125 mWd 3648628 - - - - --------------------- - -- ` -'— "- - - - - -- IV 0 /T 'a zo, Ap° \ / O DENOTES 1/2 INCH RON PPE MONUMENT FOUND 0 DENOTES 1/2 INCH BY 14 INCH IKON MONUMENT SET AND MARKED BY R.L.S. NO. 15228 O DENOTES HENN" COUNTY MONUMENT FOUND III - - - - -J L - - -- DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS SHOWN THUS: BEING 5 FEET WIDE AND ADJOINING LOT LINES AND 10 FEET WOE AND ADJOINING STREET LINES. UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON PLAT. BEARINGS OF THIS PLAT ARE ON AN ASSUMED ORIENTATION BASED ON MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT —OF —WAY PLAT N0, 27 -102, IN WHICH THE NORTH LINE OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1, BRAEWOOD PARK. IS ASSUMED TO HAVE A BEARING OF S 89° 08' 54" E �'Oa� � JsO• `se9 \ 'TJ E�,SDsT 4p� Pa"CAFV E05 PO/ \ \ Y \\ VV 99 9 SCALE OJ FEET 0 50 100 200 F — — \ \ \ �I II orcel 406, AA1tDOT i I' Ab. 27 -102 ----- - - - - -- - - - - -- 74 I i �I wl �I �I �I O I o I i I-- -5 foot Utility and Drainage Easement - -F E7T • / — N 89'M• 02" E — 253.96 — — J � I WET LAID 4. tit T .•a / I ° •. WET LAl1® JO. \ // / NEST 4% uts ` 78TH �r+Egs \ , ( STREET (VACATED) I Ob 6S.00, 120. E s 59°01' 37• w 196.50 f / s 0 n W n a 4 21A 18 -•----- -- •- --.._.... / / N 1/4 Corse, of ' Sec. 1Q T. 14 R 21 --'� SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS `n °x VIN ON PREGA PANEL5 L5&EM 4 PLANT VOGA &ARY REEM,,nll DECIDUOUS SHADE TREES - 25' -5' GAL. ED ue ✓.tcrac129?v N5P POAER ,-- EXI5TING TREE MASSING ® �' - i II �i " + ✓ rr-�r -. - - ` ``mod t "r t t' w ✓ - ' •� _ _ - G M q} e ✓' 2 , Am I q yJCyLv 'cv qr 99 9 CITY RESiUIR Korn FMMETER OF 517E r 2,992 LF 2592 LF / 40 LF - TS REWIR°.D OVL-RSTORY TRIES 5% ORNAMffNTAL r 4 - 2' 05V000I5 OR 5' C.ONIFEROU5 60% COMPLIMENTARY = 45 - 2 1/2' DEGIDUOU5 OR 6' 00NlfWtOU5 20% AC.GBN•T • 15 - S V2' DECIDUOUS OR V OONWE i0US 10% PRIMARY = 9 - 4 1/2' DECIDUOUS OR 10' CONIFEROUS 5% BULL = 4 - 5 IR' DECIDUOUS OR 12' GONIFERGUS TOTAL KUMBE , OF OVE1i5TORY TREES SHOWN = 15 TOTAL MAC OF 1RDERSSTORY TREES SHOWN = 91 t c i7 r- r aeih: 73 r�'�'N Y 5 u,merelcern fi- B37hW.am's" u;.cmsws p igln'3 0 I rveny unlry u,as vtl. pvn, epeclnutlo.0 a report ur. prepened by tnee Cdr ny duere .,pervlelon end tYtsl I duly .e„glstmad Lsd epe hrliltau udv Ib r a we bum a n.eae. Reglavetbn Ho: RcJeet frr: FRAUENSHUH COMPANIES f-wj c N., 99-133 Chedted By 1* Defa 1.26.00 rorla<. nn datg. Dion sM dawtbed 1sr p- adu n eesntul aam 3., gspilo, ad .msr error, sn Pro - P'rtory sd mrtol be eoPlee, tlpltaesd a r�sdsyy mp�llsd. a mob a r Pen. roan s� —' =men h.- of IieP drdnacV Ltd Lte,e ena ev —, rw d- ��..tis aw ms,.va ey dr.., ea.mrar, rnvw go"..o...g.ue, wdwa end olrtce peasant a,y n acco'dew mm, tnr xottra Cq,pq a RBP drdY, -.,. Ltd. rile NI nor reamvsd LANDSCAPE PLAN Llel Geltle OC kkmtalr LITTLPJ_EAF LINDEN T111a cordate MAW WHITE OAK GLferrue bicolor MARSHAL-L'S S ®LESS AM Frax6we pervroylvanla "cmholN Seedleee' AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE Mar x froonwfl CONIFEROUS TREES - 6-12' HT. BB WHITE gg5FRIZE COLORADO GRmN SPRUCE Plcea HI SPRK.E BLACK Pll dmmota ARBORVITAE *pp. Thug Opp. 2' GAL, BB UNDER5TORY TREES - Arnokmhfer carodenms HAWTHORN THORNLESS GOC40MR Grataec�a cruejallf Tnermle' MTAP AMUR LE /�cer 9g1�r�rtado FL.DYVU3ZINNG CRABAPPLE J=AWM TREE ULAG Syr" redfaulata DEGIDUOIY SHRUBS - 05 FOT, 9' -0" O.C. MIK BUSH HONEYSUCKLE Dbrvllkm lonlcera DWARF WINCED YYM�ctMaMCcOUr fiEl'YVIFiGm DObNbOD�' Gomm eerlrap�8all ley' NbEA A�WABaLE arboreacene 'Arawbelie' =a D MOUND HON EY5LICKLE Lonlrara x xyloeteum 'Glaveyl' ALPINE CURRANT t� epp WARF KOREAN LI1AG 5r7fcja ""Or, PalabYl' SHRUBS - 05 ROT, V -0' O.G. MN. SEA GRZE4 .UWPER 0 -L,n,, m chin 19 Sea Green' 5A" ,IANIPER ocbhC.ONIFER01J9 Jfn�erb na TAUNTON SPREADING YEK Taxue x media Taunton' N5P POAER ,-- EXI5TING TREE MASSING ® �' - i II �i " + ✓ rr-�r -. - - ` ``mod t "r t t' w ✓ - ' •� _ _ - G M q} e ✓' 2 , Am I q yJCyLv 'cv qr 99 9 CITY RESiUIR Korn FMMETER OF 517E r 2,992 LF 2592 LF / 40 LF - TS REWIR°.D OVL-RSTORY TRIES 5% ORNAMffNTAL r 4 - 2' 05V000I5 OR 5' C.ONIFEROU5 60% COMPLIMENTARY = 45 - 2 1/2' DEGIDUOU5 OR 6' 00NlfWtOU5 20% AC.GBN•T • 15 - S V2' DECIDUOUS OR V OONWE i0US 10% PRIMARY = 9 - 4 1/2' DECIDUOUS OR 10' CONIFEROUS 5% BULL = 4 - 5 IR' DECIDUOUS OR 12' GONIFERGUS TOTAL KUMBE , OF OVE1i5TORY TREES SHOWN = 15 TOTAL MAC OF 1RDERSSTORY TREES SHOWN = 91 t c i7 r- r aeih: 73 r�'�'N Y 5 u,merelcern fi- B37hW.am's" u;.cmsws p igln'3 0 I rveny unlry u,as vtl. pvn, epeclnutlo.0 a report ur. prepened by tnee Cdr ny duere .,pervlelon end tYtsl I duly .e„glstmad Lsd epe hrliltau udv Ib r a we bum a n.eae. Reglavetbn Ho: RcJeet frr: FRAUENSHUH COMPANIES f-wj c N., 99-133 Chedted By 1* Defa 1.26.00 rorla<. nn datg. Dion sM dawtbed 1sr p- adu n eesntul aam 3., gspilo, ad .msr error, sn Pro - P'rtory sd mrtol be eoPlee, tlpltaesd a r�sdsyy mp�llsd. a mob a r Pen. roan s� —' =men h.- of IieP drdnacV Ltd Lte,e ena ev —, rw d- ��..tis aw ms,.va ey dr.., ea.mrar, rnvw go"..o...g.ue, wdwa end olrtce peasant a,y n acco'dew mm, tnr xottra Cq,pq a RBP drdY, -.,. Ltd. rile NI nor reamvsd LANDSCAPE PLAN Llel 1 >i kF-,� L _ J rows aRVKZ Aw#mNNW \ PARKING SITE DATA TOTAL SITE AM 5y6.IM 9 M.16 AORSA 107 1 ISYRT 9 (N! ACRES) 107 S DSAW 9 Ito ACRES) A'i LO'iM'M KMD11O covaACE 30% O ll" 91 LOT R Ro11 00?SI 9) M4RRY91 FLOOD AREA RATO LOT 1 SOIL (MAU 9) LOT 1 SRS LW,192 A DEVELOPMEIN'T DATA LOT R FLOOR ARIA RATIO 0% 1F2.RSS CMF watc"c ►OJTmm St4�.IdSSi9 AA/l(OOOUS a L A) . 7!A OR,S.T.F((LL000SS . TFRAM) . WS - MAR =-mm FARRRID RAW 7F1 STALLS RUFAQ O STALLS TOTAL 74) STALLS am GROSS FLOOR ARIA (GFA) AS D01Im N OTT OROIUIQ SECTION 650AS. LOT L R"Utt DMLO►WANT I V W LAKmmT \ \ v nAND IDGE \ �J 10 YEAR ROOD "AN OFFICE BUILDIP (7 STORM . \ DR,wAa eAREA@iT I PARKING RAMP ISOMETRIC TYPICAL PARKING LEVEL -103 STALLS J' I D. \ \ I I I I 1 1 \. I LOT 1 I 1 I LOT 2 1 I / N'- <r.R,, YIRI Vb.y. pIw Rp�aITWRablO .rawst rr. t11R IRr a IA. LIU1� a F7>A�e1L lIORIV� "URNUM wa Data F►Nr+ Ia. FRAUENSHUH COMPANIES : 66361003.00 cw" Oy Cftd" 4 aI. poly m. a�Igs •cw r�tl a�eae wvw -ASg —p- -w— — ..nrn p.- .. rw a Rs A,aA.a. Lta n..... mlbel. ro s c.,p�gn NeF+AVII.n. tm. � ao wgn.,v.�.i mr ©0 SITE PLAN Al I 1� I\ I �i FIRST FLOOR PLAN V32. ♦ V V \ P -6,075 \ 7- 27,205 6- 27,205 5- 27,205 \ 4- 27,205 3- 27,205 2- 24,563 1- 26,192 192,855 GSF 3RD THRU 7TH FLOOR PLANS SECOND FLOOR PLAN PENTHOUSE C—ho" . wp�ww w w. s • s.q ..r era �w.� rs. w y.. a w �u�... r�.�aa S4"W- iaewnw ue. FRAUENSHUH COMPANIES rmjm W. 6361003.00 D. a a.m.e ft ow rspyign imr ren.a. ua 1ma .o ng.. ti...a ARCHITECTURAL PLANS A2 SOUTH ELEVATION 1137 -r-w E S Y Ia� 1� RE FOR 3 ONLY. NNMOVSE M02 LL +IDr FO+TIOUSE FL T LL .Err SFVENM R EL M.'r snN a _ LL aar RR FO.ATN FL rl w MRD FL EL .sr SFCOM FL eL .wr FIST 0. LLO MSNiNM gATANWNL FINECSNF SPANDREL GLA73 VFOON GLASS ►6TN.COPNG STSTDA EFrNI L_ VISION GLASS - EAST ELEVATION 1137 -Y4P L �,,, Fry vE uY. oL.. �.mw s .�sS .w. p-pw-s by � r.� .y e...m nronl.S rm� SF.. Lr d LF.. W� IF A...�ISL bookm, p.BIYI -NO.. q1� MSra /O. FRAUENSHUH COMPANIES mqua m. 6361003.00 L >� er oleos/ 4 DSLI. .F �.e.rai eµ6., N•MW+>..e sa.l. wa. ti vv pywy.nd Nana b.ap..6 WpMn.e o ce.a.ly uvb..4 � r-�. a. w pn woa .p�..n.u. �• .rw a iar Y.ni.1.0. L16 iFr. --.w�Wi. ro s u.. Der�..w..g.cr..�aa......ms ay • .�ee..� ..Y• w. Ne.s r�pyigr. rm. Y.dr.�o. L1n Rlm Ae wq...�.....a BUILDING ELEVATIONS A3 ©© BUILDING ELEVATIONS A3 CORRESPONDENCE 11 V VN- : v v%O-.— 1� 7 `1 ) dow�1. bps 5y v►1 �r�.o. : vv� , r, q J CJl (raj �o�. {-, � cJ � V � . v VV R �i Z.Ca� l"�. � S�✓1 ' ! "'� `iii �, Y�Q� 4i �� �i Ak a f Q► 1tL 5 y� a r -e �•.s ,..� Z�L+- f 1 s ,s t� a l d b-e a-9 d ',-a V LcQ V '� ► i V / �JJ yI Patrick & Anne Marie Olk 5315 Pinewood Trail Edina, MN 55436 Home Phone (952) 922 -6393 April 11, 2000 Edina City Council/HRA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Grandview Square and Sherwood Park We are writing to you regarding the Grandview Square development. On March 27, 2000, OPUS/Ron Clark presented their current plan to the residents of our neighborhood. We were very disappointed to find that the plan has changed to include much of Sherwood Park for residential construction. The developers are proposing four story condominiums to be constructed in Sherwood Park along Sherwood Road and ending approximately 65 feet from single family homes. Not only does this park get used extensively by our neighborhood, it is one of the reasons why we purchased our current home. In addition, the park's layout provides a nice buffer zone between our neighborhood and the existing commercial property (soon to be Grandview Square). We feel strongly that Sherwood Park should be left alone and not included in this development. As you may already know, the Planning Commission at their March 29th meeting voted not to use the park as part of this development. The Edina Park Board which met on April 11, also does not want Sherwood Park to be developed. In addition, we do not want the park to be reconfigured to allow the residential portion of the Grandview Square development to be closer to single family homes in our neighborhood. The park will provide a nice transition from multi - family to single family residences. The height of the proposed residential buildings adjacent to the park is especially concerning. Four story buildings towering over the entrance to our neighborhood and nearby homes, clearly isn't in the best interest of our neighborhood. We would like to see the developers create multi- family residential units less than four stories high along the park property.. We understand that the layout of the site plan, which was presented to the City Council when it selected OPUS /Ron Clark for the Grandview Square development last fall, had to be revised to address the requests of the Hennepin County Library. (We have attached the original site plan and the most recent site plan for your review). We do like the latest proposed relocation of the Library/Senior Center, but not at the expense of the park land. We hope that the requests of the library and the financial goals of OPUS /Ron Clark do not outweigh the needs of current residents in this Edina neighborhood. Given the most recent site plan, we would like to have the condominiums removed from the park land and to lower the building height of the remaining residential units bordering the park. If that is not possible, we propose that the development use the original site plan (dated 10/6/99) and still limit the height of the residential units closer to the park. As Mayor Maetzold said in the spring edition of About Town "Edina's infrastructure - streets, utilities, parks and public buildings - are the essential components of the foundation of our city. The quality of life in a city is defined, in part, by its infrastructure." Please do not allow Sherwood Park to be used as part of this development and please limit the height of the condominium units close to our park. This area is where we - and nearly 50 other families - have made our home for many years. Our Edina neighborhood would like to maintain its quality of life. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. PSincerely, ' u _ _ rr � AN r 1 �-+.;p� y 2" J If dy / ::y:>, - 'i.,: - a k ��.- r'.e �7.v a'(/� o .'^ '� J - 1 ,Y� ' ./,►.. 't`+ `.f+, „�.. - y ' - _� 1'� / �.^-.. .;.jP� '�' ..� tae .o c;w� ; ✓e`'� iry�.,�. .�. . � �.''• ���r ��,r ' ti �� 11 r• _ I`• F / - N vyhr .7� / m•.,- t —� .f'rfs' r _ V' raL -✓ Y. I. l kt Pf aY. �A I. .. ,- /p yyS' �„ Yd r..� •�..:AV`I! -c� -.. `� �sia�-''s.✓ -i' �- -r n v - •_Ill i ': ^ L e}- `7•'+�'r � �"8 ., � G - L` � ��� - ter. -8• -� � a "t-. - '- .n --.�. 'S'�M'y �- , .E, � '�'�- � -N!ia 9�'.IK L ;t .. � � - � V.d�ai i :,�''•�s §Fg��� � y ';.-. � � -� � _ lC t.17 t 4.. -� <v'an .,�v.- 11MJ °-'+S� J•� Cam- ` � � .. roc � 'a: � � � �T.i f':4 �;>ly+- � :' 4. `,-�'j s "i� "+- �'t*R*t- .r•a•a'y. }.r vA,r.= 'ri.ek V„` > 1 ,�1` "'".. r•F a� -. 3 <,y-•. Y 77 �' .x.`b v� � •.��,' a :� ,M sr � ° �t�3x. � i`�' .r y, ,��+�,r i3`=r -. r`} y r - WA s 4F 4 J!, I r u. Connection I Landscape Buffer 4F.- Ni- IV Tl y. y 1f: 54' ®yam -_ �T' Wn• °�'�x�n�- -. -,'qtr F'"` "..r"r`z� .�^y, � ".� � r :. y �w � ����� � JJJ C ,� sr -• �'s �� 's `. cR�r�'%;p M i C. i�!.'j' Ilk iy. s. ai•r: F4 ., Y, IL tea• .. - vf�� 6 I f A Ir i II Schoe l Below �: REINHARDT April 12, 2000 Mayor Maetzoki Edina City Council City of Edina 4801 W. 501h St. Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Maetzokl and City Council, I am writing to you to regarding the proposed Opus /Clark development of the Grandview area and the relocation of the TAGS Edina Gymnastics facility that currently resides at 5201 Eden Circle. You may already know that TAGS Edina has the finest gymnastic program in the Twin'Cities. TAGS Edina has excellent programs for kids ages 2 to 18. The clubs Gymkids program for toddlers and preschoolers provides such a unique first gymnastic experience that no other club can mirror. My,own 2 1/2 year old son Jack loves going to "nastics" each week. TAGS Edina's competitive teams year after year consistently perform wen at the state level, often Placing in the top 3. The city of Edna is lucky to have such a gem in the community. It is very disheartening to hear that the city of Edina and Opus /Clark have no plans to assist .TAGS Edna in relocating in Edina. Agents for Opus /Clark have indicated that TAGS Edina would only receive a minimum compensation under the provisions of condemnation laws. Gymnastics facilities have such unique building requirements that a minimum compensation would surely lead to TAGS leaving the community and possibly cause a huge gap in classes if they are forced to close or downsize due to relocation difficulties.' The 1600 students and their families served by TAGS Edina deserve better than this and expect more from the city in ensuring the continuity of their gymnastic programs under these special circumstances I am not a citizen of Edina. I live in Plymouth and drive 20 -30 minutes past several other private gymnastic clubs and community programs on my way to TAGS Edina. Why,would someone go so out of their way for a once a week, 45 min. toddler gymnastic class? I do this every week because TAGS is the industry leader and the best gymnastics the. Twin Cities has to offer, even for a 2 '/2 year old. ' I am a former gymnastic coach and have first -hand knowledge of most of the gymnastic programs in the area. I have seen the other gymnastic options available to my family and none of them are even worthy of comparison to the programs that TAGS has to offer- Edina will lose big if TAGS is forced to relocate out of the city. No one can argue the need for redevelopment of the Grandview area. It has a blighted and outdated kook and' is clearly an area that has been ripe for redevelopment for many years My request is a simple. All I ask is that TAGS Edina be given reasonable and fair compensation for consideration of their special relocation needs, not the minimum compensation under the law. The city of Edina never does anything at a minimum, please do not start now. If fair and reasonable compensation is not directly within the city's control, please encourage the developer to act in a fair reasonable manner toward TAGS Thank you in advance for your thoughtful consideration of this matter. Sincerely, Wl�►v Sarah Reinhardt 4205 %ENIUM LN N • PLYMOUTH, MN • 55442 -2643 PHONE: (763)551 -4773 • FAX: (763)553 -0549 Petition To: Edina City Council From: Richmond Hills Neighborhood Association Subject: Grandview Square Development We, the residents of the Richmond Hills neighborhood oppose ceding any portion of our existing neighborhood park, "Sherwood Park ", to the "Grandview Square" development. It is of vital importance to us that you remember, as we do, that the City Council stated that the park would be left intact, a commitment also made by the Ron Clark representative at the late -fall neighborhood presentation meeting! On March 27, 2000, OPUS/Ron Clark presented its site plan to the Neighborhood Association. It was a shock to observe that "Sherwood Park" was dramatically reduced in size by four -story condominiums! This is completely unacceptable. We all believed in good faith that the developer would honor the commitment made to preserving Sherwood Park, as indicated on the plan he created and presented to the Association and the City Council in late fall -- a plan he used to gain our approval and support. (See attached site plan and overview). A considerable number of Association neighbors pointed out at Council meetings and in letters to the Council the need for keeping the park intact. Those reasons included: 1:) The park is a Vital part of this neighborhood. - people buy homes here because of the park. there is a growing number of children in the area, who need and use the park. we hold neighborhood functions there. - our grandchildren enjoy it. 2.) The park acts as a "buffer" between our neighborhood and the higher - traffic, commercial area. - this need will be even greater with the increased congestion and traffic generated from the new development. .- Sherwood Park was initially proposed by developers as offering a good "buffer" between the existing neighborhood and a new development, indicating to us acknowledged understanding of its importance. 3.) The proposed residential buildings taking over the park area are four stories high, totaling approximately 52 feet! If allowed to be developed as proposed, they would be an overwhelming presence to all nearby housing and tower over the entrance to our existing neighborhood. 4.) The park at our entrance meets a BASIC NEED. This is a unique land - locked area and we have no practical alternative for a park. We use and enjoy Sherwood Park. We have been told throughout this matter that both the developer and the City Council would respect the needs of the citizens who live in the area. It has always been Edina's practice to carefully consider these needs. Please don't let indifference or financial appeal outweigh them.... r March 29, 2000 Edina Planning Commission Edina Park Board Mr. John Keprios, Director of Parks and Recreation, City of Edina Dear Planning Commission and Park Board Members and Director Keprios; I write to request that you reject the current Opus /Clark proposed development plan, and instruct them to submit a revised plan which takes no land from Sherwood Park. Last Fall, during the process of selecting a developer for the Kunz -Lewis site, Opus Northwest and Ron Clark Construction's original proposal for their development, "Grandview Square ", entirely eliminated the existing neighborhood park, Sherwood Park. Their second proposal, presented to the HRA, the City Council, and the Richmond Hills neighborhood in a neighborhood meeting, left Sherwood Park as it currently is. As you will recall, residents of Richmond Hills expressed their concern to this developer and to the City Council that land in Sherwood Park not be used in this development. Both the developer and the City Council gave assurances that existing parkland would not be used in this development. On Monday March 27, 2000, I attended a presentation by Opus /Clark at Our Lady of Grace. Their most recent proposal involves `,`reallocating" a very large piece of Sherwood Park to their "town square" and siting four story condo /townhouses on the park. They claim that this will increase parkland; further they claim the neighborhood will have access to the "town square ". At best, these claims are a pleasant fiction. Opus /Clark's current proposal eliminates useful park space. This space is currently used by the neighborhood. In addition to the variety of sports, including but not limited to football, volleyball, soccer, baseball, and softball, played or practiced by neighborhood children; that space provides a wide open play area for kite flying, Frisbee; running, etc. Such space is not readily available elsewhere in the area. The Richmond Hills neighborhood uses the existing Sherwood Park. It is the only city park readily and safely available to children in the neighborhood. In addition to recreational activities, Sherwood Park has served as a gathering place for neighbors and a wonderful location for birthday and graduation parties (my son's university graduation party was held there). Sherwood Park has also been a buffer between the existing single family homes in Richmond Hills and the business activity of the Grandview area. I described the developer's claims regarding their use of the Park as, at best, a pleasant fiction. By changing Sherwood Park's present space, there will no longer be sufficient open space for, athletic or recreational activities (other than jogging in place). Even though access is provided from th e remnant of Sherwood Park to the proposed town square, I doubt children & adolescents will be welcome there —even should they desire to use that limited space. By several accounts, Mr. Clark believes that proximity to park areas such as Sherwood Park are a detriment to his developments, or at least to their expeditious sale. He may well be correct. I suspect that means he will seek to actively discourage uses of the Park and the town square which provide this effect. Neighborhoods and neighborhood parks are important to the quality of life here in Edina. The preferences of the existing neighborhood should be a concern of the Council, the HRA, the Planning Commission, and the Park Board. Please reject the developer's proposal and clearly indicate that no current land in Sherwood Park is to be used in this development. Sincerely j John Menke 5301 Pinewood Trail Edina, MN 55436 612- 922 -2608 Petition Signature Page s` v� u11�q^z (p-(o4�3 Sa .29 F' ichwooclov- F-rllhe" Mw Signature CIP /Postal Code 5-:5,Y` 3G Name Phone Number ''Address 'City State /Province , , ZIP /Postal Code` a2�o- q3 6�`cX�wood 9r. IdkncN MpJ SS43co A/W A(19f3L&61 /S/ V5 y0 A.) 5 3Cv Signature 7% S��O R 1cd wlnae ' ZIP /Postal ,Code. Signature . e �''' �3� 3 Petition Signature Page -Name !PhoneNumber 'J.Aaaress . . ,_ � , ; � - � -- S3tS p. „Q,.�Cod�rt�;l ;tea` V►'1/ - -�� j 3 Co ���r ;c,k Of k yzz -1,33 Si at� D �f Nart�e Phone °Number Address' Clty Stcte' /Province ZIP/Postal, I7✓Ihe%�ar�e 01�� q�2 -6393 S3eS �;hp,�.,Ced Trail Col��o, j'YIIl1 SSq3 Co Si n� Name ° Phone Number Address ;:City. ' State /Province ZIPjPostal Code NI�c {►�u�Sf�r,��� qa�� I'( 5 -Q 3 MN Signature _.. �llti ;, CIt �. Sfate ProVlnce . ;< `ZIPjPosfaf Code , Name PhoGne:Numnber :- `Address „„ . _ W( iIWOCG' T. / q [ } C.�l �N 55q,? C Signature Name' Phone Number, Address . , Clt :State Province. , ZIP Postal Code o `l a 8 -6mi 3131 S j-y2 C. Si natures n (N' 0 c:,..,,. +. — R Petition Signature Page 'Name Phone Number Address City State /Province ZIP /Postal Code X 7 !�Xk l 7-kc4twM M09- E�DiAA 04 IV Signature 'Name Phone Number Address , Ct State /Province ZIP /Postal Code Allwy Signature Name Phone Number Address >Clty :State /Province, ZIP /Postal Code /` Gc.� 7�� �! u .rre �c� �.Q i •�J�— AJ Si ature ` Name Phone.Number ;'.`Address " Clty State /Province ZIP /Postal Code Name Phone: Number ;,;- Address city.", State / Pro vince ZIP PostaLCode Signature Petition Signature Page Sig re �,,� `� • �� �� CIO 0- `� � s`���.�.� -�.�, chi � � �'• S (h-h. 55 �3 f� Name 'Phpne'Number Address - City > State /Prov(nce ZIP /Postal Code "lb a 5a 41 u,v�d h� Nz M n/ S 6 Signature ' 9 a y- a 3 a a (pfw-"�f l `Name .; Phone Number . Address:: „ 1_ Cit .,t, .. ....,., :State /Province, ZIP /Post67 Code, SignaturdfA Name ;.Phone Number ; Address` ::CIt` . State /Province . ZIP` PostcFCode le Signature Name Phone Number `Address 'City Stovince," ZIP %Po cfeJPr stcf Code , �..3 b Sign�ure l� L Name o e Nu er :;;Address Cii :" Sibte /Province TIP/ 01606 Signature Petition Signature Page Name. : Phone`Number , `Address;. ` , ... City` 'State /Province ZIP /P.ostal, Code C Si t ur e�'�� /��' gwa � Nam Phone. Number `;:Address° ., Ci : State /Province., ZIP /Postal Code Sigple / Na e = Phone:Num r :,. Ad r s; Ci State / Province ZIP /Postal Code Signature Q 1 w W o a P e v e �&k 7 l A 'Name- Phone,Number :Address City State /Province :.ZIP. /P,ostal:Code PAPS` Sh�luShrlessy Sig ature � 'Name be Address . - Clty 21 s State /Province. ZIP /Postal Code: �c.c�2P Y� 1`oo�c,�� S fan 5zs 2� c�w�a� Signature Petition SigQature Page .!-.--Phon6. Number, Address O J 71P/Pmfnl Signature Address m."77777 st te/ Name Phone Number Signature l. Name Phone Number:,°' ' Address , State /Province Zli' %Postcl;Code Signature Name . 'Phone Number- Address -City -'state /Province 11006st a f,Cddi` Signature Petition Signature Page I Signature / <� , � ' i : j k, N6M6�9 Phone W M b e ri A d d risi'� sf6t Or d vlhceglIF#6itGfCbde Signature Signature -7 Aj wry • -� o �R��l op a `C6dW Nd PN6 ni 6� Address., y ' Signature. Signature 7 -Mill 1�1,14.�M.:kc �Rr,,WIFFIRE Petition Signature Page ;Nome r Sig.nature VOAA-CAJ � V -4KC, E o a Signature °A I. Name. Phone Number' CC� z Signature 6 29'f I Signature - 00 stati0i'61664MI10/p, ifal,'.c6d4m P one.44 6 e lWame; - -H;1.1. Signature Petition Signature Page -P.66� W6 :Address M 11", es� 7= Signature 1))AJ EL P, �&A- qqL5- 3& �S-' 57z4 rlc4 � 912 eVMW Signature( ^ PlidAell& Signature __/ 601-.OfIchNodd Signature• � 4��dlna- AA / S'W3�, 36 Signaturer Petition Signature Page 6"2a$ R I, 4W m Signature State /Province,: ,, u mibee,",' Address Signature (I- � -U Utn 5-aO G 1 M ki ZI p P Name 1 Phone Wnbet,l Addris r 6L6 VI 6C C 011 C411 r91115 V-10ht)U00d Oy-- �-,d-lnaj M1V Signature Phone Number v 4/6 1664�A.-.1g,�,..'W/Po :ode .-,- oko\ Signature. (-Vvw kl� can 0 fhdh6 Number Sign . ature �d:A` MN l5sm� ML st`64/K4�i66il' Signature 6"2a$ R I, 4W m Signature State /Province,: ,, u mibee,",' Address Signature (I- � -U Utn 5-aO G 1 M ki ZI p P Name 1 Phone Wnbet,l Addris r 6L6 VI 6C C 011 C411 r91115 V-10ht)U00d Oy-- �-,d-lnaj M1V Signature Phone Number v 4/6 1664�A.-.1g,�,..'W/Po :ode .-,- oko\ Signature. (-Vvw kl� can 0 fhdh6 Number Sign . ature �d:A` MN l5sm� ML L It 11 r errtr + wrtlr er w+tr M rr 1tr� tww S R. � i w.ww .rtt�wrtw�.yr wr�ilr�i. w,r.�'�w rn rw�r .� 11isr +� OI-f.� rr w.w• t� Ll nr rrr 1tr 1.tt� arwr tte.w.er r tr lwnwe ti r� thtsL ttyetC tt�q a -oc a- �wWrwr.itei te•rr.wwrwMw.r y tr r rY twt G r rre rrO. w yr��� nrtw� wow 1rr r r� Wtl.Gw ~Yri� rI L s L O.IO ®L IAi ml L LI re . tltlal f. R - tla rte U aow wrwrr r rM twr trttr 1rp D trlwwlr q >0:���wr0�wa`rw. ��rwtru.rr MrrwNtar Mwewrnrrtwwaw rrn• \W wn .,r. (� r wwrre •►►�� �ww �Iwr Orr rw1'w,Y Y. RTf/�Ol lw+ li L.teu' Y+d wlrJtr r ryr ti,i4 .ml r �!. r ttM, r N r�r r enitrrur�) r w ww r,4 r rr'iTA r �to1 r r rr w r tr tr b r Jwwr t® >us LN omralm YG tr ten a te,q. fii 1r 4 r tan. w~rr�w f; � r r a+ece lrtt r 1w L tra t. rrq .Od1,Eq 1rw.w d4 ttw�r, w.r r w � t..r.e w,e�w.rwrtrawr.r lrirrte. r.,w�rrwr.� r�rllwarrlr rt.r �f� oe rrrwr. ,w � �ririr .�wr1 +ter. � atirr�irw, r � r�iriril u e w:w rr w �Ytrt rrrrw.✓r.rrw wrr r ttr •.1 r u 4 tr 1 e:r w lw� r+r r r rV wr Y tr.1 Ytr W1t —12 � 1r w rr ar . r 'wa r ns w mr r tr i. s r wr �wr m r . u rrMtw 1 u a r t tt lw ttr. . w s wu tr w r tyw t. w + r , r� .�ttl Ar r1r � irtr � rr. rrw. + r r fr Atl Vrwr r.,rtrfrlwr..wr�r +wr lrr.erYLMY r r w r .,r.r ww r .r fitter 1.1 L .r�...lwwwnn. r t.Mrt YrOww�J r w. rrtrt �� +0_rre ��wrwY�w.1� +W� r�ry r� w ,W► r w 4+ 1rt r •ra + yrs aor L s.ts � rn` r i tr i �etl 11wrt Ct� tr.rr, t4 trr r r f.Lt . r r das tr wr1 r W t tr i eQ wtraa ew.ry r . r ettrr w w . rrt w!. bw r 1 w u 4 wr ti. rti~rr.y or. r trtr eeri��u 4 tre tti wt+n + r t.w r + .rut • rrt.r r tw wtt te.e r r ruirtli « 1tw�lwtt s�� rr., twrr r ..1t tr�! � r ~ rr .,w + r.r•wwl 4 L Yw R tY.e41 MY, y t4 Irt twlwy r r _O�rirr Lt �rr�riirlW�� t�i�rw. e�w�r r r iw Ir Yw/ r twlrr.r�r w r.trrrrtrwrrwr rwelrufr•rtr rwYl, WiirrNOlr.j rw wY f,rrrr W Y•rr rwe tr t: rtte �wY W r w! r rr� Wry r . w1w a r itrr r_r ru it rlwytre rrr wr.rliArrwYu trrrrrrl. r.etttwlltttt.rr . lrrw . rtrrrrtlrr 1rr•r rrrr r rr rJt -t�1 r r tJw rtr r 11w rtrtttt� w~r.,%= Jr r MO-40M ar w u 1 O e 90MM wwtrt r r ,e.r/.tr rttr rwrr 0—k rttrr �® =,�rr�. a mv rww s.r.r r r aras.G aVw JI rY f fr 6 I/ r I�'t r rr / r f rt 4 60nmR �r at.,t rrw.L ry M wv lw I wr rte► r r Lr. Or Orr.r me a trwtl lnp a wwrr ! � I JgfVO Jr r4 Y L ®ttft ,Ywr !•nit rrr f � Jr 41 at- .ftd!. a0! v f r �tcwt trtttl+ o..tr ft.rt •..r.pnTL.tt ram oryl ter r~rr�rtt�J � � r J>`Jat .to! Jtti �w1wOl. mot �� � w+� wt �� 4tiiM �.arrr r u a 4y I I I AL WACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY FOR- OPUS NORTHWEST RR87'AMERICAN TITLEINSU RACE COMPANY 40 20 0 40 s0 FEET im 1tr. r err.. wrrttw rYtwyrrw�•+. 4 t•.r. tttw�� ti r w r�rt rt.�r ii�r 1trt r tr r.rr 1rr r rty Oe,1w Y er r rtr to Yt r✓. � w,w Oe1r �ww � .we..�i rrr trt�.r w^tw w�itAr wr ltrr .ar MMn• errr w.~w ..ter rr ar•.Ir. w� :w �.rw ar..1.t��r.rrrtw.. rr. trrr r 7�wwwr �� rtr.r• r Cwrr wY Crrr wrr rrrr rar. r.rres.•rrr 1trY. rwww r rr r er r #s� lAmd sue, ur- // rtww �r • wViwe J =I \ SHERwnOn RnAn ' \ WM DATA form Attu sew Iat Cm/ tl� 41R an ats FOAMC *AM 111E AM was seso v. tam Ieat sole 4wa AS tits omm mct 1a1: MIND Ga. UVAIV ale mm In Ilan on10E ttuEO1C sI RM str Mom We Im AaeO w 14210sa now �O a0o• >tIlt7 I ea a6 "M om a se to= WSW Imam ■W am= ram aaq ff4 41011MI r tat t00 4af4pae O NMAM ale IM MA s III m n am. "Mau mumm Ita r 111111. eao as ma t#t1vA! 0142 Ulm r tMtaR wleo lea WAO s Pa a s1Omt a IIIII) m wa42 m RsaP M wave asap P 0 tmalm 421.1.0► wR 011011100 40 saw ffa waq m a4ua �-1 an 100 i.1 BYE RAN 0 m 40 w 1E0 240 J a M. **0* F \ SHERWOOD ROAD l r,al.1 REVISED SITE PLAN SOO LINE RAILROAD 4 %4U' 1 am PLAN 0 20 40 60 160 240 OPUS. MA kchnKb t Eno w ,6 ,*m 6�u ho, tod 6M brilL I1MMM'e 55M e1: -M-0A { F. 612-66 -619 allR REN SHARDMW AND•UBAN � marv, ■nvra ar �. J. BUXELL ARcBrn C1 m LTD Ron Clark CM*Uction 8 Design o1 -,s-ao on 1130= SAWOL 01 -12-m MY FtMLMR40KK - OYEiI11 OkVVFIOPIFM_ FIAM _ n9a SK ww - FWSE , _ro un,u �ro 6h,2 -00 C. sPEWC09 �w 1 MBGM ®. 0. ,6U6 ooa ra . rrs.r. r. wo r m.rr rrr �r .aet .rr .uw mgt • mm r ye �r �O q ® od . av, rr.r, u.e aar .e v .r W�rR a..r 00 a, -as." r■ m-al-® GRANDVIEW SOUAfE OiY� M .mar OVERALL eTE PLAN A1.1 ow e 1886 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor Maetzold and members of Agenda Item II. D. the Edina City Council. From: John Keprios, Director Consent ❑ Park & Recreation Department Information Only ❑ ❑ Date: April 12, 2000 Mgr. Recommends To HRA ® To Council Subject: Grandview Square Development ❑ Motion and Sherwood Park. ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion RECOMMENDATION: The Park Board recommends that the City work further with the developers to explore other possible alternatives in efforts to sacrifice even less and, if possible, none of the existing park land at Sherwood Park. INFO /BACKGROUND: At the April 11, 2000, Park Board meeting, the Grandview Square Development's effect on Sherwood Park was discussed. Notices were mailed to resident neighbors of Sherwood Park informing them of the Park Board meeting. Approximately 50 residents were in attendance. The current development plan proposed to utilize .64 acres of existing park Sherwood Park land. Sherwood Park is currently 1.55 acres. With the reconfiguration of Sherwood Park and the addition of the .63 acre Town Square Park, there would be a net gain of .31 acres of land, which includes the greenway connection between Sherwood Park and the proposed Town Square Park. The developers proposed a concept drawing of the reconfigured Sherwood Park that would essentially accommodate the existing park uses. Even with the accommodations for similar park uses, the residents and Park Board agreed that the loss of park land as a buffer and open play area is too significant a loss for the neighborhood to support the current plan. Staff and the developers made presentations. Staff explained to those in attendance that when considering the proposal, we must consider the needs of: • Surrounding neighbors. • Future residents of Grandview Square. • Future Senior Citizen Center participants. • Future library patrons. • The Hennepin County Board (library needs). • Future office tenants. • The Developers. • The City of Edina (need to acquire the library to expand City Hall). • The community as a whole. The developer stated that the main reasons why the current plan requires the need to use existing park land are: 1. The school bus garage real estate is no longer available to be included in the development. 2. The library insists on the new location for visibility purposes (as opposed to its original proposed placement next to the railroad tracks). 3. There is a need to accommodate adequate on- site.surface parking. 4. There is a need to develop enough taxable real estate within the tax increment district to cover the costs of the proposed public improvements (library, senior center and roads and parking). All of the residents who voiced their opinion were opposed to the current proposal that calls for the use of existing park land. Their concerns were the loss of similar recreational opportunities, open space, and most importantly the loss of a significant buffer between residential and commercial properties. After lengthy discussion, the Park Board unanimously passed a recommendation that the City work further with the developers to explore other possible alternatives in efforts to sacrifice even less and, if possible, none of the existing park land at Sherwood Park. Itt ane 0 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: Craig Larsen City Planner Date: April 18, 2000 Subject: Preliminary Plat Approval. Olinger Ridge. 5804 Olinger Road Recommendation: Agenda Item:. ll. E. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ❑ Motion ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion The Planning Commission recommends Preliminary Plat Approval subject to: 1. Final Plat Approval 2. Subdivision Dedication 3. Watershed District Permits 4. Increase Driveway Width to 18 Feet Info /Background: See attached planning commission minutes, staff report and preliminary plat. DRAFT MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON WEDNESDAY MARCH 29, 2000 S -00 -2 Preliminary Plat Approval for Olinger Ridge 5804 Olinger Road Mr. Larsen informed the Board the subject property is a developed single dwelling lot measuring 105,066 square feet in area. The property is neck shaped with the bulk of the land located some 200 feet west of Olinger Road. The property has 75 feet of frontage on Olinger Road. The property slopes considerably from north to south. Mr. Larsen explained the zoning ordinance measures lot width at a point 50 back from the street. Thus, the small lot widths for each lot. Each lot measures 121 feet in width at the building pad. This situation results from the proponents desire to serve the lots with a shared private drive instead of a public street. There is the ability to provide the necessary right of way and construct a normal 30 foot street and cul de sac. However, a new street would be very close to the back of the houses on Grove Circle, and would require the removal of some of the large pine trees on the northerly part of the site. Mr. Larsen concluded that he believes the proposed subdivision is the most sensitive, logical way to develop the property. Constructing a new public street to serve the 2 lots would eliminate the need for variances, but would not improve the plat. Rather, it would result in a larger asphalt area in the back yard of existing homes. Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat subject to the following conditions: 1. Final plat approval 2. Subdivision dedication 3. Watershed district permit 4. Increase driveway width to 18 feet Ms. D. Chance, proponent, was present to respond to questions. Commissioner Runyan noted the plans indicate a 14 foot driveway width and asked Mr. Larsen if the staff request of 18 feet is adequate. Mr. Larsen said in staff's opinion an 18 foot driveway width is adequate to service two dwellings. Continuing, Mr. Larsen explained it is the goal of staff to allow development of 1' the property without negatively impacting the neighboring properties with a "city street ". Commissioner Lonsbury moved to recommend preliminary plat approval subject to: final plat approval, subdivision dedication, watershed district permits and an 18 foot driveway width. Commissioner McClelland seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. LOCATION MAP SUBDIVISION NUMBER S -00 -2 L O C A T 10 N 5804 Olinger Road REQUEST A Two Lot Subdivision EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT i� EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 29, 2000 STAFF REPORT S -00 -2 Preliminary Plat Approval for Olinger Ridge 5804 Olinger Road The subject property is a developed single dwelling lot measuring 105,066 square feet.in area. The property is neck shaped with the bulk_of the land located some 200 feet west of Olinger Road. The property has 75 feet of frontage on Olinger Road. The property slopes considerably from north to south. The proposed subdivision would remove the existing home and plat two new lots. A comparison between the proposed lots and the 60 lots with 500 feet follows: 500 Foot Neighborhood ' Lot Width Lot Depth Lot Area 100 feet 140 feet 15,250 S.F. Lot 1 38 feet" 375 feet 56,723 S.F. Lot 2 37 feet" .337 feet 48,353 S.F. Variance required The zoning ordinance measures lot width at a point 50 back from the street. Thus, the small lot widths for each lot. Each lot measures 121 feet in width at the building pad. This situation results from the proponents desire to serve the lots with a shared private drive instead of a public street. There is the ability to provide the necessary right of way and construct, a normal 30 foot street and cul de sac. However, a new street would be very close to the back of the 4 houses on Grove Circle, and would require the. removal of some of the large pine trees on the northerly part of the site. Recommendation .I believe the proposed_ subdivision is the most sensitive, logical way to develop the property. Constructing a new public street to serve the 2 lots would eliminate the nee_ d for variances, but would not improve the plat. Rather, it would result in a larger asphalt area in the back yard of existing homes. Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat subject to the following conditions: 1. Final plat approval 2. Subdivision dedication 3. Watershed district permit 4. Increase driveway width to 1818 feet ,r r OU S T 570 6036 602 6A241.�`,, LLI r '� �AODA 5 71 i .v $R Ls j 97 2- 5 7 2' 100 -3 0P 6b121 6008 a. (3) '_� F - �` p'RS A 5725 e: �cv. d 1 PO` C I Ak I IT 6020 _ 6024 9 25) a —1 - BUST 2k0 ADDN : }.r, q 05 5804 $ o . (se) (•s - +e) v, p rf:Q G'WO .' t ssoes M0.86 c r. (W ►g t 893 124 �O �� 0 (W) (a °) (9) _ `If (,) 581 r,ly �1 8. 25 gN ., 112 M (46) .1 61 CjR F------- - - - - -- s :. ' Y S \ 610 i1 yy (e1 58 i1r r7',/ � (,r; �' = ' 198 (4 s mss- g EASY" R L SAD 112 104► (43) 5824 ANY OF TOO • $ 6 la t (I) .er c. >q .. y Ys �— 100i7 � g (27) - 81 (!!) W ,J • - ,581 p 40 ( 291 � lc:) rg CLIn- —___ .. Z OLINGER RIDGE, EDINA, MN NEIGHBORHOOD LOT DATA LECY CONSTRUCTION By: Peter Knaeble, PE (Lots within 500' of property) Map No. Area (so Width ft Depth Legal ddres 1 41,120 175 240 :RLS 590 Tract A 6021 Vernon Ave. 2 29,700 120 250 ;McGary Add. L6 131 6017 Vernon Ave. 3 17,000 115 135 (Deckas Add. L3 B1 6016.20 Bernie Cir. 4 12,000 100 135 ;Deckas Add. L4 131 6024 Bernie Cir. 5 14,750 110 135 :Deckas Add. L5 131 6028 Bernie Cir. 6 11,750 90 130 ;Deckas Add. L6 B1 ; 6032 Bernie Cir. 7 14,500 100 120 Deckas Add. L7 B1 6036 Bernie Cir. 8 18,700 170 110 ;RLS 1315 Tract B 1 5720 Olinger Rd. 9 13,220 115 115 :Robert Middlemist 2nd L1 131 6008 Grove Cir. 10 17,250 115 155 :Robert Middlemist 2nd L2 B1 1 6012 Grove Cir. 11 18,250 130 125 Robert Middlemist 2nd L3 B1 6016 Grove Cir. 12 14,000 140 95 :Robert Middlemist 2nd L4 B1 : 6020 Grove Cir. 13 24,000 240 100 :RLS 249 6024 Grove Cir. 14 27,930 133 210 ;Edina Highlands Lk. L19 B2 1 5709 Olinger Rd. 15 27,720 132 210 :Edina Highlands Lk. L18 B2 5717 Olinger Rd. 16 16,800 80 210 (Edina Highlands Lk. L17 B2 : 5721 Olinger Rd. 17 16,800 80 210 :Edina Highlands Lk. L17 B2 5725 Olinger Rd. 18 18,060 86 210 (Edina Highlands Lk. L16 B2 1.5801 Olinger Rd. 19 15,750 75 210 :Edina Highlands Lk. 1_15Z2 5936 Grove St. 20 13,500 105 125 :Edina Highlands Lk. L14 B2 1 5932 Grove St. 21 10,660 82 130 :Edina Highlands Lk. L13 B2 5928 Merold Dr. 22 10,400 80 130 :Edina Highlands Lk. L12 B2 : 5924 Merold Dr. 23 10,400 80 130 :Edina Highlands Lk. L11 B2 5920 Merold Dr. 24 13,750 100 135 :Edina Highlands Lk. L10 B2 : 5616 Merold Dr. 25 12,150 90 135 :Edina Highlands Lk. L16 B3 5908 Grove St. 26 13,000 100 130 :Edina Highlands Lk. L9 B4 : 5909 Grove St. 27 11,400 95 120 Scenic View 2nd L3 131 1 5608 Amy Dr. 28 11,400 95 120 ;Scenic View 2nd L2 131 5912 Amy Dr. 29 13,070 115 120 Scenic View 2nd L1 B1 5916 Amy Dr. 30 14,030 85 165 !Unplatted : 5813 Olinger Rd. 31 9,600 80 120 :McPherson Add. L1 B7 5817 Olinger Rd. 32 11,160 93 120 :McPherson Add. L2 131 : 5924 Amy Dr. 33 17,560 93 200 !McPherson Add. L3 B1 5920 Amy Dr. 34 12,500 104 125 :Scenic View 2nd L1 B2 : 5917 Amy Dr. 35 11,250 90 125 :Scenic View 2nd L2 B2 5913 Amy Dr. 36 19,490 73 267 :Unpiatted : 5829 Olinger Rd. 37 24,030 90 267 Boris Add. L1 B1 5901 - Olinger Rd. 38 40,050 150 267 :Doris Add. L2 B1 1 5917 Olinger Rd. 39 13,750 100 140 :Deer Run L4 B1 5614 Olinger Rd. 40 14,000 100' 140 (Deer Run L3 B1 1 5910 Olinger Rd. 41 34,250 165 185 Deer Run L2 B1 1 5906 Olinger Rd. 42 58,000 270 215 ;Deer Run L1 B1 1 5902 Olinger Rd. 43 24,500 100 245 :RLS 812 1 5824 Olinger Rd. 44 23,100 110 210 :Loudon Add. L3 B1 ; 5816 Olinger Rd. 45 20,900 100 209 (Loudon Add. L2 B1 1 5812 Olinger Rd. 46 18,630 90 207 ;Loudon Add.. L7 B1 5808 Olinger Rd. 47 20,000 115 170 Blake Ridge Estates L13 B1 1 6100 Sherman Cir. 48 15,000 100 150 ;Blake Ridge Estates L12 B1 6104 Sherman Cir. 49 15,500 100 160 :Blake Ridge Estates L11 B1 6106 Sherman Cir. 50 20,750 150 195 :Blake Ridge Estates L10 B1 : 6112 Sherman Cir. 51 13,500 105 105 :Blake Ridge Estates L9 B1 : 6116 Sherman Cir. 52 11,500 90 130 :Blake Ridge Estates L8 B1 : 6120 Sherman Cir. 53 14,500 95 145 :Blake Ridge Estates L7 B1 : 6124 Sherman Cir. 54 15,750 120 140 ;Blake Ridge Estates L6 B1 : 6128 Sherman Cir. 55 13,500 110 125 :Blake Ridge Estates L5 B1 : 6132 Sherman Cir. 56' 11,250 90 130 ;Blake Ridge Estates L2 B2 : 6125 Sherman Cir. 57 16,000 95 165 !Blake Ridge Estates L1 B2 : 6129 Sherman Cir. 58 17,100 95 180 ;Blake Ridge Estates L3 B2 : 6117 Sherman Cir. 59 13,500 100 150 :Blake Ridge Estates L4 B2 : 6109 Sherman Cir. 60 16,750 100 185 :Blake Ridge Estates L5 B2 1 6101 Sherman Cir. Mean 17,841 110 162 Median 15,250 100 140 Name Dudek ;Dudek !Prasciunas ;Feldman IOlstad :Fauihaber :Witt (Parry Jahuke !McPherson :Swenson Jaffee. :Ossell :Liija ( ahier ,Wheeler. :Ostman :Fingerman !Ott ISletten :Herrick �eug :Lang :Tjaden ;Jensen Fiuneke :Griffin bonnelly Poage !Sutherland :Risch :Chakravorthy :Pedersen !Drew :Berg Roddy :Dodge :Halliday :Woodbury i I• SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS ELL/NG UNIT D S RICT /N THE R 1, SINGLE D 1. A map drawn to 100 scale showing all residential lots. (R -1) within 500 feet of the subject property and reference numbers; (see definition of Neighborhood in 810)Section 2. property owners names and addresses of residential lots (R -1) within the "500 foot neighborhood "; 3. legal .description of all residential lots (R -1) within the "500 foot neighborhood "; 4. lot area for each lot ; 5.: & mean and median lot area (in square feet) of all lots within the "500 foot neighborhood" 6. the lot width, as defined by Section 850, for each lot; 7. the mean and median lot width, as defined b loon 850, of all lots; 8. the lot depth, as defined by Section 850, for each , 9. the mean and median lot depth, as defined by Section 850, of all the lots; 10. all measurements and data shall come from' /4 section maps prepared by the Hennepin County Surveyor. Method of Measurement and Calculation used `12 ° -J` I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. of Signature Date Minnesota Registered Land- �uweyor License No. y C January 18, 1996 Ms. Dee Chance 5804 Olinger Road Edina, MN 55436 Dear Dee, Thank you for showing me the development plans for your property. I'm very concerned about the drainage plan. The plan indicates that surface waters will be collected from most of the development and funneled onto the back of my property. This proposal directs runoff into my yard from a much wider area than it currently receives. The back of my property is already a problem area due to poor planning by developers in the construction of the house at 5902 Olinger Road. Surface waters back up because of the grading that was done for the house at 5902 and a poorly devised drainage system under their driveway. The back 40 feet of my yard turns into a slough during the spring. I'm worried that the proposed drainage plan will turn this portion of my yard into a wet area all year round. I do not want the back portion of my yard turned into a wetland. Although I fully respect your right to sell your property, I will not allow the developer to drain the project onto or through my property. Sincerely, Kathleen M. Zeug 5824 Olinger Road Edina, MN 55436 voice mail: 1- 800 - 328 -9378 ext. 77146 direct: 1-609-797-1036 temporarily mailing address is 304 Somerset Lane, Marlton, NJ 08053 c: Edina City Planner, Langs, Tjaden, Jensen, & 5902 Olinger) R a �fA"Z,04%, `,_ 9 CL Adjacent House Cate E_ 1` Di REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: Craig Larsen City Planner Date: April 18, 2000 Subject: . Final Development Plan. K.E. Peters Billiard Supply 7685 Parklawn Avenue Recommendation: Agenda Item: ll. F. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends '❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ❑ Motion ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion The Planning Commission recommends Final Development Plan Approval subject to: 1. Watershed District Permit Info /Background: See attached Planning Commission minutes, staff report and plans. LOCATION MAP i I I I IVE — IN Imm 1% Ll A RKLASI m.�l lank, Emm, F I N A L L Mom lh T NUMBER P-00-2- PLAN LOCATI -Ok 7685 Parklawn Avenue REQUEST Addition to an existing office./warehouse EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT LA E L- E DINA- .. 1% Ll A RKLASI m.�l lank, Emm, F I N A L L Mom lh T NUMBER P-00-2- PLAN LOCATI -Ok 7685 Parklawn Avenue REQUEST Addition to an existing office./warehouse EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT DRAFT MINUTES OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON WEDNESDAY, MARCH 29, 2000 P -00 -2 K.E. Peters Billiard Supply, Inc. 7685 Parklawn Avenue General Location: North of West 77th Street and east of Parklawn Avenue Request: Final Development plan for an addition to existing office /warehouse building Mr. Larsen informed the Commission the proponents are seeking approval for a 4,500 square foot addition to the rear of the existing office /warehouse building. The building currently contains 25,000 square feet of warehouse space, and 3,000 square feet of office space. The addition would be for shop and assembly of pool tables. The warehouse area would continue as storage, and the office space would continue unchanged. The owner indicates his intent to remove the blue paint from the front of the building. Mr. Larsen pointed out the proposed combination of uses generates a parking demand'of 35 spaces. The proposed plan provides 44 spaces. . Mr. Larsen concluded staff recommends approval of the proposed Final development Plan conditioned on: Watershed district permit Representatives of Peters Billiard were present to respond to questions. After a.brief discussion Commissioner Workinger moved to recommend Final Development Plan approval subject to obtaining a Watershed District permit. Commissioner Ingwalson seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 29, 2000 STAFF REPORT P -00 -2 K.E. Peters Billiard Supply, Inc. 7685 Parklawn Avenue General Location: North of West 77th Street and east of Parklawn Avenue Request: Final Development plan for an addition to existing office /warehouse building The proponents are seeking approval for a 4,500 square foot addition to the rear of the existing office /warehouse building. The building currently contains 25,000 square feet of warehouse space, and 3,000 square feet of office space. The addition would be for shop and assembly of pool tables. The warehouse area would continue as storage, and the office space would continue unchanged. The owner indicates his intent to remove the blue paint from the front of the building. The proposed combination of uses generates a parking demand of 35 spaces. The proposed plan provides 44 spaces. Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the proposed Final development Plan conditioned on: Watershed district permit t Ate: + + ++ + ++ + ++ + + ++ + ++ + ++ + ++ + y + ++ + + + + + + + + + + + + +.. ++ + + ++ + + ++ + ++ + ++ ++ ++ • ++ ++ ++ ++ +.+ + ++ + ± + + + + ++ Lu Q 460 FT. r= `� +- I.��st� alel .. I LL� ®fl�iE;L''13711111�lIIFI�El2it 40 0 N .. � . 1r NEW2VII12 -� J O.H. DOOR i} NEW RETAINING W AID' WA R REMOVE EAST ++ _s 460 FT. )� )� 1\< W N CUSTOMER PIG(I1P 44 PARKING SPACES (INCLUDING 1 HANDICAP) REQUIRED PARKING: 20 1I200SF OFFICE 15 112000 SF WAREHOUSE 35 2.28 ACRES 34% GREEN SPACE REQUIRED GREEN SPACE: LESS THAN 3 ACRES = 30% I I 11I I 22.8 L.+ U-Le0 20 SITE PLAN ' 1 6r•, c, It 2oa Peters Billiard Warehouse ADDITON AND REMODELING 7665 Parklawn Avenue South Edina, Minnesota 612 866 8433 Rolf Lokensgard Architecture, Inc 5552 ,9,br1dOs 00.- sulb 100 sl Paul Ylnnwbb 66725 561452 5261 Fax 661 462 5251 FILMWOmoLcOm I bweby OrrKRy ar» rib o, �Wd 'On' w nporl Mrr pap-d by mew undo my dlrscl wparvWon v,u do I the ue duly 1 a 0�r SYU d undo Da1A RwWxMJon No. REVISIONS: / 919,00 BANNING COMMISSION s am I I<IN IT Site Plan 1 b b � I I 11I I 22.8 L.+ U-Le0 20 SITE PLAN ' 1 6r•, c, It 2oa Peters Billiard Warehouse ADDITON AND REMODELING 7665 Parklawn Avenue South Edina, Minnesota 612 866 8433 Rolf Lokensgard Architecture, Inc 5552 ,9,br1dOs 00.- sulb 100 sl Paul Ylnnwbb 66725 561452 5261 Fax 661 462 5251 FILMWOmoLcOm I bweby OrrKRy ar» rib o, �Wd 'On' w nporl Mrr pap-d by mew undo my dlrscl wparvWon v,u do I the ue duly 1 a 0�r SYU d undo Da1A RwWxMJon No. REVISIONS: / 919,00 BANNING COMMISSION s am I I<IN IT Site Plan 1 4 To ll 1. Bulldlny Classification ,99T Wvlorm 8w7ding code 1999 Minttaeole SMte Building Code A. Occupancy B Busine55 A building or structure, or ponion thereof, for office, professional or service -type transactions, Including storage of records and accounts. S-I Slga" Moderate- hazard storage occupancies including buildings or portions of building used for store a of combuegde materials not classified F -1 Fe �rNktg and hv�lsfona2 or Group M Dccupancles. e „r� . oderate- hazard factory and industrial occupancies including factory end industrial uses the1 ere not classified as Group F. DNisim 2 Occuparriee. SF Occupancy Factor Occupants 4,043 B OIfi00 IDD 40 27,671 S-1 Warehouse 600 36' F -1 Wood shop 500 6 94,143 Total square feet 6o Total occupants $g�ypp�p�,� When an approved spray booth constructed in accordance wit theme Code is installed, such booth need not be separated from Group B, F. or S ocoupardes. Table 3-R. 5 For Group F. Division t woodworking establishments with more than 2,500 square teat, the ocupancy separation shall be one how. Section 504.3 The sum of the ratios of the actual area for each separate ccapanry fOtAl allowable area for each separate occupancy shall not exceed aria: BFd6000 + S -1 r3300D + F- 1136000 - AS 'j9C1@10;A.6: Occupant bad for warehouses containing approved high rack storses systems designed to meclanicel handling may be based on the floor area exclusive of the rack sm a tether than the prose Ilaor arcs. (39% Red storage) B. Type of Conelructlon IIN Sprinkled C. Location an Property Separation on cif sides D. Allowable Floor Area 12,000 Table 5-8 12,000 Fire extinguishiN system a= Separation an all aides 36,000 Atiowtlble Actual Floor Area 29,643 F�rieti 4.500 ADDfI�ON 34,149 Total actual floor area E. MeiaM 6 Number of Stories 1 story, 26 R 2. Occupancy requirements Commodities: 1. pass III: Wood pool tables 2. Class III: Barstools wood and metal 3. Gass III: Game tables— IooshalDair hockey/ pinbelV wood bare 4. Gass II: Pool table state 5. Class III: Billiard Acc, ssMes— cusslchalk/dothMuah 6. Gass VI: Darr Boards/ rubber cushions/ covers/ seats 4. Exiting requirements Sa�tton t0033,�„� Rim Private steps and stairways serving an occupant load of ,w man 5 D errs starways may be constructed with an 13-inch-maximum rise and a B -inch minimum run. Section 10033.3.6 Handrails Private stairways do not require handrail extensions. Section 508.3 Oeeninns. The open space between the intermediate rails or ornamental pattern of guardrails in areas of commercial and industrial -type occupancies which are not accessible to the public may be such that a aphem 12 inches in diameter cannot pees through. FLOOR PLAN 2 MEN'S BATHROOM ELEVATION WOMEN'S BATHROOM ELEVATION BATHROOM ELEVATION LAV REQUIREMENTS 2 SCAM sr =1.4r a H `O, H 9 a I i Peters Billiard Warehouse ADDITON AND REMODELING 7685 Parklawn Avenue South Edina, Minnesota 612 866 8433 Rolf Lokensgard Inc - Architecture, 3W Sto ebrldee Drin Suha 106 61 Paul Minnesota 66123 651 452 3251 Fas 651452 3251 RLASta ®sW.cers M ell h a I i Peters Billiard Warehouse ADDITON AND REMODELING 7685 Parklawn Avenue South Edina, Minnesota 612 866 8433 SCALE: 111 VO 41 I hereby oerllly that this pun, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my dlrsct supervision and that I am a duly Ragtatersd Architect under this taw of the 6tata or ldnrwaa Data Regbtrafon No. REVISION: 9.19.00 BANNING .2 111 9asiD7RG- pEA�irT Floor Plan Building Classification Interior Elevations 2 Rolf Lokensgard Inc - Architecture, 3W Sto ebrldee Drin Suha 106 61 Paul Minnesota 66123 651 452 3251 Fas 651452 3251 RLASta ®sW.cers SCALE: 111 VO 41 I hereby oerllly that this pun, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my dlrsct supervision and that I am a duly Ragtatersd Architect under this taw of the 6tata or ldnrwaa Data Regbtrafon No. REVISION: 9.19.00 BANNING .2 111 9asiD7RG- pEA�irT Floor Plan Building Classification Interior Elevations 2 i TO: FROM: VIA: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Mayor & City Council Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: 18 April, 2000 AGENDA ITEM III.A. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Sanitary Sewer Lift Station Replacement at 6630 Dakota Trail Improvement No. LS -22, Contract No. 00 -5 (ENG) Company 1. F.F. Jedlicki, Inc. 2. CCS Contracting 3. Penn Contracting, Inc. 4. Engineering & Construction Innovations, Inc. 5. Veit & Company, Inc. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: F.F. Jedlicki, Inc. GENERAL INFORMATION: Amount of Quote or Bid 1. $ 74,000.00 2. $ 81,091.00 3. $ 81,370.00 4. $ 85,980.00 5. $ 86,587.50 $74,000.00 This project is for the replacement of an existing mid- 1960's sanitary sewer lift station located at Dakota Trail. The Engineer's Estimate is $57,450.00. The project will be funded from utility funds. Staff recommends awarding this project. Signatur The Recommended Bid is within budget not within I Public Works - Engineering Depart ent t n a in, Finance Director n Hu6lket, Vity Manager O e En . o. o '�,�bRwaM�6 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: 18 April, 2000 AGENDA ITEM iii.B. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Curb & Gutter - W. 56`" Street & Brookview Avenue Improvement No. A -096, Contract No. 00 -4 (ENG) Company 1. Hardrives, Inc. 2. DMJ Corporation 3. Midwest Asphalt Corporation 4. Ingram Excavating, Inc. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Hardrives, Inc. GENERAL INFORMATION: Amount of Quote or Bid 1. $87,642.60 2. $89,993.50 3. $89,996.35 4. $92,204.00 5. $87,642.60 This is a re -bid for the installation of curb and gutter along W. 56th Street between Oaklawn Avenue and Park Place. Bids were taken for this project last fall and rejected because costs were too high. The revised scope of work was reheard by the Council on March 21" . The overall cost of the project and storm water concerns were raised by residents at this public hearing. Staff reanalyzed the storm sewer concerns and the project will include expanding the storm sewer system to catch more surface water north of West 56th Street along Brookview Avenue. This will occur by extending a storm sewer pipe one lot north of West 56th Street along Brookview Avenue and constructing two catch basins on either side of Brookview Avenue at this point. Future extension of the Storm Sewer system will occur when the remainder of Brookview Avenue is reconstructed. Assessment costs for this project were also a concern of the residents attending the public hearing. The proposed assessment costs of $60 per assessable front foot will remain pending on these parcels. The Final Engineer's Estimate is $93,375.00. Funding for the project will be from special assessments and the stormwater utility fund. Staff recommends awarding this project Sig ure The Recommended Bid is within budget not within bud rtme Joh 6 Wallin, Finance Director Gordon Hugh, City Manager e )', En less TO: FROM: VIA: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Mayor & City Council Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: 18 April, 2000 AGENDA ITEM in.c. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Retrofit Engine & Pump on Water Tanker Truck Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Ruffridge Johnson 1. $ 16,131.00 2. ABM 2. $ 18,980.00 3. Stepp Manufacturing 3. $ 29,000.00 4. 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Ruffridge Johnson $ 16,131.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This is for the purchase of a new engine and pump which will be retrofitted on the rear of Unit Number 25 -330, a 1981 water tanker truck. This purchase is funded through the Street Department Equipment Replacement fund. Si na The Recommended Bid is within budget Public Works - Streets Department not within budget 46hn Gor n Hughes, UY Manager Finance Director ,w'91N�1'tr�, o e 0 • ,NroRPORA�'O � 1000 REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: VINCE BONGAARTS TRAFFIC SAFETY COORDINATOR Date: APRIL 18, 2000 Subject: TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW - APRIL 3, 2000 RECOMMENDATION: Approve Traffic Safety Staff Review for April 3, 2000. Agenda Item IV.A. Consent Information Only El Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council ElMotion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Y TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW MONDAY, APRIL 3, 2000 The staff review of traffic safety matters occurred on April 3, 2000. Staff present included the Police Chief, the City Engineer, the City Planner, the Assistant City Engineer, the Public Works Traffic Control Specialist and the Traffic Safety Coordinator. Also attending the meeting were Lieutenant Kane and Sergeant Stroh from the Edina Police Department and Mike Eastling, City Engineer, and Tom Foley, Transportation Engineer, from the City of Richfield. From that review, the below recommendations are provided. On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and the staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They have also been informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, they can be included on the April 18, 2000, Council Agenda. SECTION A: Requests on which the staff recommends approval. In January of this year the staff recommended and the Council approved a request for a bus stop on Ohms Lane at W.74th Street. In the process the staff recommended the following: a. Elimination of all 10 minute parking on Ohms Lane. b.- Creating a bus stop on the east side of Ohms Lane approximately 110' north of W. 74th Street. c. The addition of approximately 160 feet of 10 minute parking on the north side of W. 74th Street east of the post office's north exit. These changes were in line with the City's Transportation Policy to encourage bus usage and hopefully ease traffic congestion.. Golden Valley Microwave Foods and several other large office complexes are in this immediate area and they all generate a lot of traffic. There also is no on street parking allowed in this area except for the. 10 minute spots at the post office. Everyone else in the area is required to provide off street parking. The post office in general seems to feel that parking is not their problem. TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW April 3, 2000 Page 2 The above changes apparently created some parking problems for some of the people using the post office. In order to alleviate some of this problem the staff is recommending the following: a. Move the bus stop to W. 74th Street, to the south side of the street west of Ohms Lane. b. Put 10 minute parking back on the east side of Ohms Lane north of the post office entrance driveway. (The original 10 minute slots that were between W. 74 Street and the entrance to the post office will not be replaced for safety reasons). c. Leave in place the 10 minute parkinq on W. 74th Street east of the post office exit driveway. d. Re- stripe and reposition the centerline on Ohms Lane approaching W. 74tH Street to allow easier truck and bus turning from W. 74 Street to northbound Ohms Lane. 2. Request for better street marking and signage.on Ohms Lane at W.73`d Street. Requestor feels that there is some confusion on the merging of traffic lanes at this intersection. Staff recommends that Ohms lane from W. 72nd Street to W. 74th Street be re- striped along with lane "Merge" signs to properly reflect intended use of that road. 3. A request from the 50th & France Business and Professional Association for the City to authorize on street parking, on the west side of France Avenue between W. 47th and W. 49th Streets for vehicles with employee parking permits only. The west side of France is presently no parking. There is a sidewalk that runs from W. 47th to W. 50th Street on that side of the street. The Association letter is attached. Hennepin County was contacted for their approval of parking on France Avenue, (County Road 17) specifically with the question of using permit only parking. The staff recommends written approval for the installation of 8 AM to 6 PM parking by permit only - Monday through Friday, for the west side of France Avenue from W. 47 Street to W. 49 Street during the construction of the north rams at W. 49 1/2 street subiect to Countv permit and legal review by City attorneys. TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW April 3, 2000 Page 3 SECTION B: Requests on which the staff recommends denial of request. None. SECTION C: Requests which are deferred to a later date or referred to others. At the request of Richfield City Engineer, Mike Eastling, the staff met with Tom Foley and him to discuss their traffic problems at W. 70th Street and Xerxes Avenue. Richfield would like to cut off traffic from entering Richfield via W. 70th Street eastbound from the Southdale area at Xerxes. W. 70th Street from Xerxes to Penn Avenue in Richfield is a designated residential street. Richfield has W. 69th Street as the designated collector street and would like to have all the traffic from the Southdale area going east in this area, use W. 691h Street. W. 70th Street would still have access westbound to the Southdale area. Richfield estimates there is presently an ADT of 3500 vehicles on W. 69th Street and 3000 on W. 701h Street. In essence, Richfield's plan would call for eliminating any eastbound traffic on W. 70th Street at Xerxes. There still would be traffic access westbound on W. 70th Street to the Southdale area and also traffic access northbound and southbound on Xerxes at W. 70th Street. This would be done on an experimental basis with Richfield providing all the signage, barriers, etc.. The staff recommended to Richfield that they provide us and .Hennepin County with a proposal laying out their plan. This will also affect York Avenue which is a County Road. The staff's only concern was regarding traffic eastbound from York Avenue on W. 78th Street and how to handle that, and that concern was voiced to Mike Eastling and Tom Foley to deal with on their planning. Any recommendations from the staff will be pending until the staff receives Richfield's proposal. TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW April 3, 2000 Page 4 2. Request for a "Deaf Child" sign. Requestor lives at 517 Blake Road and'has an 18 month old deaf child. Request was referred to Hennepin County as it is a County Road and they must authorize the signage. 3. In February, the staff recommended that a letter be sent to Hennepin County asking them for their current plans regarding CSAH 31 (Xerxes Avenue) between. Highway 62 and W. 66th Street. A letter was sent and Thomas Johnson, Transportation Planning Engineer for Hennepin County answered it on 3/17/00. A copy of that letter is attached to this report. Basically, they are saying that there are warrants for a signal at W. 64th Street and Xerxes but that would be at the City's expense and only after substantial planning and agreement. They would allow no signalization at Heritage and Xerxes because it is too close to Crosstown Highway. Plans for changes in this area would have to include Richfield. The staff plans on addressing this. issue with Richfield in the near future. There appears to be no changes in immediate future for this area. 4. In January of 1999, a request was received for all -way "Stop" signs at Interlachen Boulevard (CSAH 20) and Blake Road. The request was forwarded to Hennepin County regarding that intersection. They since have done a traffic study there and determined that there are no warrants met for all -way stops. 50TH & FRANCE BUSINESS & PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION P.O. Box #24122 EDINA, MN 55424 -0122 (612) 922 -1524 (612) 922 -4413 FAX In an effort to address the loss of approximately 150 parking spaces in the North Ramp during the construction period from April through October, 2000, the 50th & France Association has arranged with Grace Church of Edina for employees to use 150 parking spaces at the north end of the church parking lot, adjacent to 52nd St. This is approximately a one block walk from the southwest quadrant of 50th & France. Covenant Church of Edina, one block west of Halifax on West 50th St., has a new minister this month who may be able to help us arrange the use of 40 or so spaces on Mondays, Tuesdays, Thursdays and Fridays. The lot is fully used by the church on Wednesdays. A request has been sent to Pastor Anderson at the Church. This provides convenient additional parking for employees on the west edge of 50th & France. Lutheran Church of the Good Shepherd, at 48th and France, has traditionally worked with the 50th & France Association to provide overflow parking, but at this time they have arranged with Pinehurst Properties to provide parking for crews working on the new building on the northeast corner of 50th & France from February until December 2000. Therefore we are requesting that the City of Edina authorize parking on the west side of France between 47th and 49th streets for, vehicles with a City of Edina employee parking permit weekdays from 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. This would provide parking within easy walking distance of the northwest quadrant of 50th & France near the North Ramp where the employee parking is being lost during construction. The 50th & France Association Parking Committee also is requesting signage at the ramps that directs employees to the overflow parking. The Association will work with the City of Edina and the City of Minneapolis to provide up to date parking information to 50th & France employees on a monthly basis. Although there was discussion of hiring the Grace Church shuttle bus to operate for a period of time in the mornings and afternoons, the Association was informed that church insurance policies prevented this use of the busses. Since the Association is already committing to provide donations to the churches who make parking available to us, making other arrangements for shuttle busses would be prohibitively expensive. Although it seems that employee parking enforcement would not be feasible in.church lots, it is our expectation that Edina Employee Parking Permit sales would be held in April of 2000 as usual. Some employees might choose to park in the church lots during the construction season and postpone purchase of a permit until North Ramp construction is complete. We believe those employees would be motivated to allow a few extra minutes to get to work each day. Karen Knudsen, Exec. Dir. 50th & France Association Hennepiiqpp March 17, 2000 Mr. Vince Bongaarts Traffic Safety Coordinator City of Edina 4801 West 501h St. Edina, MN 55424 -1394 Re: CSAH 31 (Xerxes Avenue) at Heritage Drive and at 64`h St Dear Mr. Bongaarts: This letter is in response to your February 23, 2000 letter inquiring about the county's plans for CSAH 31 in the vicinity of Heritage Drive and 64th Street. In our March 31, 1999 letter we supported the city's desire to eliminate the eastbound left turn from Heritage Drive to northbound Xerxes Avenue. In the very short tern, signage could be used to prohibit the left turn. However, in order to actually eliminate left turns the city would need to physically reconstruct the Heritage Drive approach to Xerxes Avenue. We also pointed out that such construction would divert some traffic south on York to 64th Street." We further mentioned that the county could not support the installation of a traffic signal at Heritage Drive because of the close proximity to the ramps on the south side of Crosstown Highway. We stated that we would investigate whether or not traffic volumes met the technical warrants required for the installation of a signal further to the south, at 64th Street. We conducted a 16 hour turning movement study at the intersection of Xerxes Avenue and 64th Street. In addition, we determined the amount of traffic originating on Heritage Drive that would be diverted from the Heritage Drive intersection to the 64th Street intersection. With or without diversion from Heritage Drive, three warrants for signal installation would be met at the intersection of Xerxes Avenue and 64th Street. In accord with county board adopted policy, signal installation can be considered where one or more signal warrants are met and the Priority Factor is 30 or more. The Priority Factor is a composite of traffic volumes and accident factors. For the intersection of 64th Street and Xerxes Avenue the Priority Factor is 28 without diversion, and is 34 with diversion from Heritage Drive. Thus, the county is willing to consider allowing the installation of a signal provided that the city simultaneously reconstructs the Heritage Drive approach to Xerxes Avenue, in a manner acceptable to the county, so as to physically preclude all but southbound right turns off of Xerxes onto Heritage Drive. In this case, where the Priority Factor is sufficient to allow signal installation, but is relatively low compared to many'other- candidates, the county would not be in a position to participate in the cost of a Transportation Department 1600 Prairie Drive Recycled Paper Medina, MN 55340 -5421 (612) 745 -7500 FAX: (612) 478 -4000 TDD: (612) 852 -6760 Mr -Vince Bongaarts March 17, 2000 Page 2 signal... We are however willing to allow the above mentioned improvements.to be made at the city's expense. If the city wishes to install a traffic signal and reconstruct the Heritage Drive approach to Xerxes Avenue, you should work further with Mr. Bruce Polaczyk (763) 745 -7650 of our Design Division who can provide further direction regarding design standards, and for the drafting of an appropriate agreement for county compatible signal equipment. If the city wishes to proceed with a signal at 60 Street, and roadway changes, please be aware of the need to allow sufficient time for the city's preparation of plans, preparation of the required Signal Justification Report, and for the.drafting and county board approval of the agreement referred to above. If you have questions on any part of this'response please feel free to contact me at 763 - 745 -7630. Sincerely, Thomas' D. John on, P.E. Transportation Planning Engineer TDJ:wKp.jrh Cc: Jim Grube Bruce Polaczyk Greg Chock/Jerry Smrcka Hennepii!i County pp March 13, 2000 Mr. Vince Bongaarts Traffic Safety Coordinator City of Edina 4801 West 50Th St. Edina, MN 55424 -1394 Re: CSAH 20 @ Blake Rd. Dear Mr. Bongaarts: Earlier, the City of Edina inquired about what might be done at the intersection of CSAH 20 (Interlachen Boulevard) and Blake Road. We have since conducted a traffic count to determine whether the technical warrants for an all -way stop are met. Upon comparing the traffic counts to the criteria in the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, we note that warrants are not met for either a traffic signal, or for an all -way stop sign. In fact, the warrant for an all -way stop is met only for two of the required eight hours. I would offer that the city may be in a position to further review the situation if other remedial measures are taken in regard to the cut through traffic. Further, it is our expectation that jurisdiction of CSAH 20 will be returned to the city in the future. Please call if you have any questions about the response. Sincerely, Thomas D. Johnson, P.E. Transportation Planning Engineer TDJ:WKp.jrh Cc: Jim Grube Transnortation Department 1600 Prairie Drive Kecyciea raper Medina, MN 55340 -5421 (612) 745 -7500 FAX: (612) 478 -4000 TDD: (612) 852 -6760 o e Cn \Nro ] SSCa7o't // REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # ry B_ From: Chief Michael Siitari Consent ❑, Information Only ❑ Date: April 14, 2000 „ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Appeal of Administrative Action ® Motion Citation — City Code 900 (Furnish ❑Resolution Alcoholic Beverage to Person Under ❑ Ordinance 21) F-1 Discussion Recommendation: A $1000 fine and three day suspension of Two Guys From Italy's license to serve alcoholic beverages pursuant to City Ordinances 900.10 and 160.16. Info /Background: The Police Department conducted undercover compliance checks of all establishments licensed to serve liquor on March 24, 2000. A 20- year -old law enforcement student was served a glass of white wine at Two Guys From Italy. The server did not ask for identification. Two Guys From Italy was previously cited for furnishing alcoholic beverage to a person under 21 on July 27, 1999. The administrative penalty matrix, developed in 1999, calls for a $1000 fine and three -day license suspension for a second violation. In July of 1999, seventeen (17) of twenty nine (29) establishments in the City sold alcoholic beverages to persons under 21 years of age; only 41 % of alcohol retailers in Edina were in compliance with state law and city code prohibiting such sales. July's was the first such compliance operation conducted by the police department since full liquor licenses were issued by the City in April of 1999. In November of 1999, seven (7) of twenty -nine (29) establishments sold alcoholic ° beverages to persons under 21. 76% of alcohol retailers were in compliance during this inspection period. The March of 2000 compliance checks had the same results as November of 1999 — a 76% compliance rate. 0 MONITORING AND ENFORCEMENT OF LICENSED LIQUOR SALES ESTABLISHMENTS ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTIES TYPE OF VIOLATION 1 st vio. 2nd vio. 3rd vio. 4th via 1. Commission of a felony Revocation NA NA NA related to the licensed activity 0 2. Sale of alcoholic Revocation NA NA NA beverages while license is under suspension 3. Adult Entertainment Revocation NA NA NA 4. Sale of Intoxicating liquor Revocation NA NA NA where only license is for 3.2 percent malt liquor 5. Refusal to allow City $1,000 $2,000 Revocation NA inspectors or Police Fine Fine admission to inspect 3 day 7 day premises Suspension Suspension 6. Sale of alcoholic $500 $1,000 $2,000 Revocation beverages to under -age Fine 3 day 7 day person suspension suspension 7. After/before hours sale $500 $1,000 $2,000 Revocation of alcoholic beverages Fine 3 day 7 day ° suspension suspension S. After hours consumption $500 $1,000 $2,000 Revocation of alcoholic beverages Fine 3 day 7 day suspension suspension 9. Illegal gambling or $500 $1,000 $2,000 Revocation prostitution on premises Fine Fine Fine 3 day 7 day suspension suspension 10. Failure to take reasonable $500 $1,000 $2,000 Revocation steps to stop person from Fine 3 day 7 day leaving premises with suspension suspension ° e n REPORT/RECOMMENDATION \ Well Well To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # ry c From: Chief Michael Siitari Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Date: April 14, 2000 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Appeal of Administrative Action ® Motion Citation — City Code 900 (Furnish ❑Resolution Alcoholic Beverage to Person Under ❑ Ordinance 21) F-1 Discussion Recommendation: A $500 fine for Daniel's Italian Restaurant pursuant to City Ordinances 900.10 and 160.16. Info /Background: ° The Police Department conducted undercover compliance checks of all establishments licensed to serve liquor on March 24, 2000. A 19 year -old law enforcement student was served a glass of red wine at the Daniel's Italian Restaurant. The server did not ask for identification. This is the first violation for Daniels. The administrative penalty matrix, developed in 1999, calls for a $500 fine. In July of 1999, seventeen (17) of twenty nine (29) establishments in the City sold alcoholic beverages to persons under 21 years of age; only 41% of alcohol retailers in Edina were in compliance with state law and city code prohibiting such sales. July's was the first such compliance operation conducted by the police department since full liquor licenses were issued by the City in April of 1999. In November of 1999, seven (7) of twenty -nine (29) establishments sold alcoholic beverages to persons under 21. 76% of alcohol retailers were in compliance during this inspection period. The March of 2000 compliance checks had the same results as November of 1999 — a 76% compliance rate. June 1, 1999 Dear Edina Beverage Alcohol Retailer: At the direction of the City Council, the Police Department has developed a plan for regular compliance checks done inside and outside licensed liquor sales outlets. Uniform and plain clothes officers will be making frequent unannounced compliance checks. Underage decoys will be used at least twice in each license period per licensed business. Employee training, as well as knowledge and compliance with State law and City Code, are the responsibility of the license holder. Violations found will result in enforcement action which may include arrest, citation and administrative penalties as outlined on the attached Enforcement Schedule. Violations will result in more frequent inspections. All licensed liquor sales outlets will be inspected including 3.2 beer on and off sale, wine and full liquor. Providing for a safe and healthy environment in and around liquor sales establishments and controlling access to alcohol by underage people are of prime concern to the community and strict enforcement will be used to forward these goals. We hope you find this information useful and we thank you for your efforts to reduce youth access to alcohol in our community. Because we value your feedback, please call the Edina Police Department at (612)826 - 1610 with any questions or comments and ask to speak to the Investigative Lieutenant. Sincerely, William C. Bernhjelm . Chief of Police. Edina Police Department ° e REPORT /RECOMMENDATION sY2 �cn To: Mayor & City Council From: Chief Michael Siitari Date: April 14, 2000 Subject: Appeal of Administrative Citation — City Code 900 (Furnish Alcoholic Beverage to Person Under 21) Agenda Item # ry n_ Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ® Motion ❑Resolution Ordinance Discussion Recommendation: A $1000 fine and three day suspension of Eden Avenue Grill's license to serve alcoholic beverages pursuant to City Ordinances 900.10 and 160.16. Info /Background: The Police Department conducted undercover compliance checks of all establishments licensed to serve liquor on March 24, 2000. A 20- year -old law enforcement student was served a glass of white wine at the Eden Avenue Grill. The server did not ask for identification. The Eden Avenue Grill was previously cited for furnishing alcoholic beverage to a person under 21 on July 27, 1999. The administrative penalty matrix, developed in 1999, calls for a $1000 fine and three -day license suspension for a second violation. In July of 1999, seventeen (17) of twenty nine (29) establishments in the City sold alcoholic beverages to persons under 21 years of age; only 41 % of alcohol retailers in Edina were in compliance with state law and city code prohibiting such sales. July's was the first such compliance operation conducted by the police department since full liquor licenses were issued by the City in April of 1999. In November of 1999, seven (7) of twenty -nine (29) establishments sold alcoholic beverages to persons under 21. 76% of alcohol retailers were in compliance during this inspection period. The March of 2000 compliance checks had the same results as November of 1999 — a 76% compliance rate. o��e1�11� REPORURECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item IV. E. From: GORDON L. HUGHES Consent CITY MANAGER Information Only ❑ Date: APRIL 189 2000 Mgr. Recommends El To HRA ® To Council Subject: RESOLUTION APPROVING El Motion TRANSFER OF CONTROL ® Resolution KBL CABLE SYSTEMS OF El Ordinance THE SOUTHWEST, INC. El Discussion RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the attached resolution. INFO/BACKGROUND: On April 4, 2000, the City Council conducted a public hearing concerning the proposed transfer of control with respect to our cable TV system. The City Council closed the public hearing but continued further consideration of transfer until the April 18, 2000, meeting. This continuance was suggested by the Attorney for the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission in that Time Warner Cable had not as yet agreed to reimburse the Commission for expenses incurred as a result of the transfer..We have now been advised that Time Warner has agreed to such reimbursement and therefore we recommend adoption of the attached resolution. h RESOLUTION NO. 2000-46 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE TRANSFER OF It Of Edina CONTROL OF KBL CABLESYSTEMS OF THE SOUTHWEST, INC y THE CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISEE, RESULTING FROM INC AND MERGERS OF SUBSIDIARIES OF TIME AMERICA ONLINE, INC. INTO AOL TIME WARNER, INC. WHEREAS, on or about January 1, 1987, the City of Edina, Minnesota ( "City") passed and adopted Ordinance No. 1996 -4, granting a Cable Television Franchise ( "Franchise ") currently held by KBL Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc. ('.'Franchisee "), a subsidiary of Time Warner, Inc., doing business as Time Warner Cable (collectively, "TWI "); and WHEREAS, on January 10, 2000, a certain Agreement and Plan of Merger ( "Merger Agreement ") was made and entered into by and among TWI and America Online, Inc. ( "AOL "); and WHEREAS, the Merger Agreement contemplates the merging of a to- be- formed TWI subsidiary and a to- be- formed AOL subsidiary with a parent holding company known as AOL Time Warner, Inc. ( "AOL Time Warner "); and WHEREAS, TWI and AOL have requested consent by the City to these mergers and the resulting transfer of control of the Franchisee to AOL Time Warner; and WHEREAS, under the Franchise and applicable state and federal law, the proposed mergers and resulting transfer of control of the Franchisee require consent from the City; and WHEREAS, the City has reviewed the proposed mergers, transfer of control, and the legal, technical, and financial qualifications of AOL Time Warner; and WHEREAS, based on information obtained and on the reports and information received by the City from TWI and AOL, the City has found no reason to disapprove of the proposed transfer of control of the Franchisee to AOL Time Warner. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council for the City resolves as follows: 1. The Franchise is in full force and effect, and the Franchisee is the lawful holder of the franchise. 2. The Franchisee will remain the lawful holder of the Franchise after consummation of the mergers contemplated under the Merger Agreement. 3. The City hereby consents to and approves of the proposed transfer of control of the Franchisee subject to: a) Closing of the transaction contemplated within the Merger Agreement pursuant to the terms and conditions described in information provided to the City by TWI and AOL. b) AOL Time Warner or the Franchisee notifying the City in writing of the. completion of the mergers and the transfer of control within thirty (30) days of the date of closing. City Hall (612) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 826 -0379 RESOLUTION APPROVING TRANSFER OF CONTROL KBL CABLESYSTEMS OF THE SOUTHWEST, INC. c) The Franchisee, within thirty (30) days of the date of closing, providing the City with a signed acceptance of this Resolution in the form attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. d) AOL Time Warner, TWI, or the Franchisee, within thirty (30) days of the date of adoption of this Resolution, reimbursing the City for substantially all reasonable costs, expenses, and professional fees related to the City's review and action on the proposed mergers and the transfer of control. 4. The City hereby waives any right of first refusal which the City may have to purchase the Franchise, or the cable television system serving the City, but only as such right of first refusal applies to the request for approval of the mergers and the transfer of control now before the City. 5. In the event the mergers of the TWI and AOL subsidiaries into AOL Time Warner contemplated by the foregoing resolutions is not completed, for any reason, the City's consent shall not be effective. 6. The City's approval of the transfer of control does not waive or diminish any lawful authority of the City to require the provision of non - discriminatory access to the cable system for providers of Internet access service, subject to applicable law. The City and the Franchisee have not waived any rights, obligations, claims, defenses, or remedies regarding the authority of the City to impose such conditions. Prior to the enactment of any such requirement, the Franchisee shall be provided with reasonable notice and an opportunity to be heard, including the right to present evidence on any findings to be made by the City with respect to the need for such a requirement. 7. To the maximum extent permitted by all applicable local, state, and federal laws, this Resolution shall not be construed to in any way relieve the Franchisee nor limit the Franchisee from any liability under the Franchise. This Resolution shall take effect and continue and remain in effect from and after the date of its passage, approval and adoption. Approved this 18`h day of April, 2000. ATTEST: City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of April 18, 2000, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20 _ City Clerk 01A 4` O. REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: Gordon Hughes City Manager Date: April 18, 2000 Subject: Quit Claim Deed - Transfer from City of Edina to MNDOT as part,of Land Exchange Involving Braewood Park Plat - Frauenshuh Development Recommendation: Agenda Item # Iv.F. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ❑ Motion ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Authorize Mayor and Manager to sign Quit Claim Deed providing ponding, drainage and temporary easements on Braewood Park Property subject to the new plat moving access control line to the west side of the new frontage road. Info /Background: This is part of the City's negotiation with MNDOT to provide for 1 494 / TH 169 inter- change improvements involving City property and MNDOT land. The City would provide the land subject to MNDOT providing land to Edina for construction of our frontage road to serve our property. The attached Quit Claim Deed needs to be modified by a new right -of -way plat to move the right of access control to the west side of the new frontage road. The Council needs to take this conditional step to enable MNDOT to release a "lis pendens" action on our property. In essence it removes a potential condemnation action so that the City may sell to the developer. The attached Quit Claim would need to be changed to reflect a new right -of -way plat number and the sketch on the back side indicates the easements we are granting for the plat. - - E ONE OF LOT 1, BLOCK 2, I CICKOVSKY'S ADD. V O ALSO W LINE OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1, BRAEWOOD PARK �o A,— 1 04• —\ \ c� R -960.00 #56 4" �� DRAINAGE EASEMENT PARCEL / 406, MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF WAY PLAT 27 -102 / I Lj I �PONDING EASEMENT PARCEL 406, MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF j `5 WAY PLAT 27 -102 l `9`9,9 S'LY LINE OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1, /� GQO0OO rBRAEWOOD PARK. op 0� �u S6,6 6'QG' °�' Q� !O SST DSO o0 / 78th - '` (' s STREET POINT NOT \ $� ¢ TANGENT (A$ pEr�ICATFD IN PLAT OF BRAMOD PARK) --- "POINT A' S6. A ti6' > �'QG� ¢� 880/01 0 "W S s z LLI Z �- �W Or 1 0 �- Z p4 V - �t 3 �[ /' /-) -r- L- v / Fo R=741 r QUITCLAIM DEED STATE DEED TAX DUE HEREON: $ Dated: -'19 C.S. 2785 (494 =393) 906 Parcel 406 County of Hennepin For a valuable consideration, City of Edina, a municipal corporation under the laws of the state of Minnesota, Grantor, hereby conveys and quitclaims to the State of Minnesota, Grantee, real property in Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: All of the following: All right of access to Lot 1, , Block 1, Braewood Park, as shown by th'e access control symbol as Parcel 406 on Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat Numbered 27 -102 as the same is on file and of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota; the title thereto being registered as evidenced by Certificate of Title No.. 762409; together with other rights as set forth below, forming and being part of said Parcel 406: Ponding Easement: A ponding easement in perpetuity, which shall include the right to drain, overflow, or flood with water, as shown on said plat as to said Parcel 406 and designated as a ponding easement. Drainage Easement: A drainage easement in perpetuity as shown on said plat as to said Parcel 406 and designated as a drainage easement. Temporary Easement: A temporary easement for highway purposes as shown on said plan as to said Parcel 406 by the temporary easement symbol, said easement.shall cease on December 1, 1999, or on such earlier date upon which the Commissioner of Transportation determines by formal order that it is no longer needed for highway purposes. together with all hereditaments and appurtenances belonging thereto. Check box if applicable: ❑ The Seller certifies that the seller does not know of any wells on the described real property. ❑ A well disclosure certificate accompanies this document. ❑ 1 am familiar with the property described in this instrument and I certify that the status and number of wells on the described real property have not changed since the last previously filed well disclosure certificate. Page 1 of 2 01 LW REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: - MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: CEIL SMITH ASST TO THE CITY MANAGER Date: APRIL 18, 2000 Subject: TEAMSTERS LOCAL #320 LABOR AGREEMENT 2000- 2001 (POLICE OFFICERS) Agenda Item IV.G. Consent Information Only Mgr. Recommends RECOMMENDATION: _ Authorize execution of contract for 2000 and 2001 with police officers. ❑ To HRA ® To Council ® Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion INFO/BACKGROUND: Staff and representatives of Teamsters Local #320 have concluded negotiations regarding their labor agreement. We are happy to report that an agreement has been reached for 2000 and 2001. The proposed contract provides the following terms: 2000 2001 Wage Adjustment 3.0% 3.0% Health Insurance $30 /month $10 /month* The 2000 adjustments represent the same package that was . provided to non - bargaining employees. * The 2001 insurance adjustment would be adjusted to match the non - bargaining employees if their contribution is more than $10 /month or it is subject to a re- opener (on this issue only) if premiums rise by more than 5% next year (approximately $25 /month increase). REPORT/RECOMMENDATION - TEAMSTERS LOCAL #320, LABOR AGREEMENT 2000`- 2001 (POLICE OFFICERS) April 18, 2000 Page two Other changes to the contract are as follows: Sick Leave - The police officers accept the City's new sick leave buy back policy provided to non - bargaining employees. Holidays - The City will pay two and one half (2 1/2) times their regular rate of pay for police officers who work on a holiday. There will also be a reduction of one floating holiday from the holiday schedule. Field Traininiz Officer Pay - Increase hourly supplement to Field Training Officers from . $1.50/Hour to $2.50 per hour. Fitness Incentive - The fitness incentive will increase from $600 to $625 per year. In accordance with the 1994 program, this contribution must be applied- to the -cost of dues "or- fees for membership or use of a qualifying fitness facility or program. The amount of payment may not exceed the cost of the dues. Currently, approximately 40% of the bargaining unit employees take advantage of this program. We believe this program serves our interest by reducing work related injuries and illnesses that are very costly to the department. Detective /School Liaison/Narcotic Officer Supplemental Pay - The City will increase the supplemental pay for these positions from an additional $250 /month to $275 /month. Additional Wage Step in Salary Schedule - An additional step has been added to the wage schedule for patrol officers. Staff believes the proposed contract is within the budget guidelines of the Council. We continue to believe the two year contract benefits both parties. Therefore, we recommend approval of the proposed agreement. o e 1888 REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item IV•H• From: CEIL SMITH Consent ASST TO THE CITY MANAGER Information Only El Date: APRIL 189 2000 Mgr. Recommends El To HRA ® To Council Subject: TEAMSTERS LOCAL #320 ® Motion LABOR AGREEMENT 2000- ❑ Resolution 2001 (ANIMAL CONTROL El Ordinance 'AND COMMUNITY SERVICE El Discussion OFFICERS) RECOMMENDATION: Authorize execution of contract for 2000 and 2001 with Animal Control Officer and Community Service Officers. INFO/BACKGROUND: Staff and representatives of Teamsters Local #320 have concluded negotiations regarding their labor agreement. We are happy to report that an agreement has been reached for 2000 and 2001. The proposed contract provides the following terms: 2000 2001 Wage Adjustment 3.0% 3.0% Health Insurance $30 /month $10 /month* The 2000 adjustments represent the same package that was provided to non - bargaining employees. * The 2001 insurance adjustment would be adjusted to match the non - bargaining employees if their contribution is more than $10 /month or it is subject to a re- opener (on this issue only) if premiums rise by more than 5% next year (approximately $25 /month increase). REPORT/RECOMMENDATION - TEAMSTERS LOCAL #320 LABOR AGREEMENT 2000 - 2001 (ANIMAL CONTROL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE OFFICERS) Other changes to the contract are as follows: Sick Leave - The bargaining unit accepts the City's new sick leave buy back policy provided to non - bargaining employees. Training Pay - Supplemental pay for training new community service officers would increase from $1.50 to 1.75 per hour Animal Control Officer Pay - An additional step has been added to the animal control officer's salary schedule. Fitness Incentive - The fitness incentive will increase from $240 to $500 per year. In accordance with this program, the contribution must be applied to the cost of dues or fees for membership or use of a qualifying fitness facility -or program. —The amount- of-payment-may-not-exceed -t a cost_o -- the dues. Currently, 2 of the 4 bargaining unit employees take advantage of this program. We believe this program serves our interest by reducing work related injuries and illnesses that are very costly to the department. Staff believes the proposed contract is within the budget guidelines of the Council. We continue to believe the two year contract benefits both parties. Therefore, we recommend approval of the proposed agreement !r 11 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: Francis J. Hoffman 1� Information Only City Engineer1 Date: April 18, 2000 Subject: Receive Feasibility Report Action for School Road Street Resurfacing Improvement A -189 Agenda Item # iv. i. Consent Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ❑ Motion ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Receive Feasibility Study Info /Background: The public hearing date for this project was set by Council for May 2, 2000 at the last Council Meeting. °4 a �(, FEASIBILITY STUDY- A189 ay ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT "fie tom' CITY OF EDINA STREET IMPROVEMENTS SCHOOL ROAD, RUTH DRIVE, AND W. 59TH APRIL 18, 2000 LOCATION: School Road from West 601h Street to Concord Avenue, Ruth Drive, and West 59th Street. e N + 4,. e W E �- WATER TOWER S W seas Q w.z to St CONCORD ELEMENTARY p are woe aoe 4471 L U O = 17+2 a No0 SCH00=0AD 17+7 aw a 1 4471 4»s 1778 4n5 4"1 417 4718 4708 14705 ale a+a 5417 s5ro 4850 4870 are a17 508 NOa 400 In1 4720 are 4717 4708 4708 1 555 W 60TH ST q4.828 4825 571 4817 481J 4808 4801 177+ 4717 4708 1705 4701 8000 8004 eaos 8004 Boos 8004 8508 PROJECT MAP INITIATION & ISSUES: This project was staff initiated by the Edina Engineering Department as part of the neighborhood street reconstruction program. The street department requested that this street be reconstructed due to the poor pavement condition. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The existing roadways were constructed in 1956 and consist of 24 to 30 foot wide bituminous urban section. The pavement is in relatively poor condition and is very brittle with minor areas of alligator type cracking. This roadway appears to be at the end of its useful life; meaning overlaying or seal- coating this pavement would not be feasible. Some sections of the existing concrete curb and gutter have also settled. FEASIBILITY STUDY SCHOOL ROAD, RUTH DRIVE, AND W. 59TH APRIL 18, 2000 Page 2 Pavement condition on School Road IMPROVEMENT: This project involves removing or reclaiming the existing bituminous pavement, regrading the roadway bed, removing any excess material, and repaving the roadway with a two and one -half to three inch bituminous pavement. Any concrete curb and gutter that has settled will also be replaced. City utilities in this area (sanitary sewer, water system, and storm sewer system) have been reviewed and will not require any upgrading at this time. RIGHT -OF -WAY: Adequate right -of -way exists. FEASIBILITY: This project is feasible from an engineering / city standpoint. EASEMENTS: No additional easements will be required. COMPLETION: 2000 Construction Season (June- August) ASSESSMENTS: A special assessment of approximately $2,300 per assessable lot will be levied against the properties along School Road from West 60th Street to Concord Avenue, Ruth Drive, and West 59th Street. The City of Edina's water tower property will be assessed 2 assessable lots. The Edina Public Schools will also be assessed 24 assessable lots FEASIBILITY STUDY SCHOOL ROAD, RUTH DRIVE, AND W. 59TH APRIL 18, 2000 Page 3 PROJECT COSTS: The total estimated project cost is $120,000, which includes indirect costs of 22.5 %. Indirect costs includes engineering, clerical, and finance costs. PROJECT SCHEDULE: The following schedule is feasible from an Engineering standpoint: Council Orders Public Hearing ...............April 4, 2000 Receive Final Feasibility Report ............ April 18, 2000 Public Hearing . ............................... May 2, 2000 Bid Opening ....... ...........................June 1, 2000 Award Contract .... ...........................June 6, 2000 Begin Construction ... ......................End -June, 2000 Complete Construction ........................August, 2000 COUNCIL CHECK Rn__STER 12- APR -2000 (13 ,) page 1 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM_- `__ -_ OBJECT-- - - - --- -PO -NUM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 209389 04/18/00 $27.06 AAA CREDIT SCREENING SER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 7761- POLICE DEPT. G PROF SERVICES < *> $27.06* 209390 04/18/00 $27.83 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR BELLEV TELEPHONE 041300 ED ADMINISTRAT TELEPHONE. CONTRACT: < *> $27.83* 209391 04/18/00 $249.50 ALL SAINTS BRANDS COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 00019739 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 04/18/00 $402.20 ALL SAINTS BRANDS COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 00019931 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 04/18/00 $153.00 ALL SAINTS BRANDS COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 00019938 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 04/18/00 $149.60 ALL SAINTS BRANDS COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 00019939 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE < *> $954.30* 209392 04/18/00 $250.28 AMERICAN GOTHIC RYDER CUP PRINT 032700 CLUB HOUSE GENERAL SUPPLI 6485 < *> $250.28* 209393 04/18/00 $108.96 AMERICAN SERVICES CORP. CONTRACTED REPAIRS 004685 YORK OCCUPANCY CONTR REPAIRS < *> $108.96* 209394 04/18/00 $78.10 AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAR CLEANING SUPPLIES 033100 GOLF DOME CLEANING SUPPL 6323 04/18/00 $20.06 AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAR LAUNDRY 033100 GRILL LAUNDRY 6323 04/18/00 $139.68 AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAR LAUNDRY 033100 YORK OCCUPANCY LAUNDRY 04/18/00 $42.86 AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAR LAUNDRY 033100 VERNON OCCUPAN LAUNDRY 04/18/00 $42.60 AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAR LAUNDRY 033100 VERNON SELLING LAUNDRY 04/18/00 $40.47 AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAR LAUNDRY 033100 YORK SELLING LAUNDRY 04/18/00 $264.42 AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAR LAUNDRY 033100 FIRE DEPT. GEN LAUNDRY 04/18/00 $193.83 AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAR LAUNDRY 033100 CITY HALL GENE LAUNDRY 04/18/00 $114.19 AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAR LAUNDRY 033100 507H ST OCCUPA LAUNDRY < *> $936.21* 209395 04/18/00 $159.72 AMUNDSON, ERIK CELLULAR - PATROL 033100 PATROL TELEPHONE < *> $159.72* 209396 04/18/00 $16.06 ANCHOR PAPER CO. INC.. BROCHURE PAPER 52653970 COMMUNICATIONS COMMODITIES 04/18/00 $9.22 ANCHOR PAPER CO. INC.. LICENSE PAPER 52653970 ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $25.28* 209397 04/18/00 $573.19 ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER MOBILE RADIO 23491 EQUIPMENT REPL EQUIP REPLACEM 5809 < *> $573.19* 209398 04/18/00 $75.00 ANDERSON, KATE ALCOHOL COMPLIANCE DE 032400 POLICE DEPT. G INSP. EXP. < *> $75.00* 209399 04/18/00 $150.00 ANOKA COUNTY SHERIFF'S D OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 041000 GENERAL FD PRO DUE TO OTHR GO < *> $150:00* 209400 04/18/00 $470.00 ANOKA - HENNEPIN TECHNICAL INSPECTOR COURSE 30789 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $470.00* 209401 04/18/00 $9.41 ARCH PAGING PAGER FOR VINCE 040100 BUILDING MAINT TELEPHONE 5753 < *> $9.41* 209402 04/18/00 $238.00 ASHWORTH INC. MERCHANDISE 650084 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6211 04/18/00 $230.52 ASHWORTH INC. MERCHANDISE 650420 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6212 < *> $468.52* _"OUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 7HECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION GENERAL MAINT ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 209404 04/18/00 $141.27 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS RUBBISH REMOVAL 40100 FIRE DEPT. GEN 04/18/00 $332.02 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS RUBBISH REMOVAL REMOVA 40100 04/18/00 $332.01 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVA 04/18/00 $92.64 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS RUBBISH REMOVAL CLUB HOUSE RUBBISH 04/18/00 $21.70 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS RUBBISH REMOVAL 40100 LITTER REMOVAL 04/18/00 $519.46 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS RUBBISH REMOVAL REMOVA 40100 04/18/00 $43.40 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVA 04/18/00 $347.17 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL RUBBISH 04/18/00 $456.40 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS RUBBISH REMOVAL 04/18/00 $43.40 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS RUBBISH REMOVAL 04/18/00 $69.70 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS RUBBISH REMOVAL 04/18/00 $681.45 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS RUBBISH REMOVAL 04/18/00 $76.40 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS RUBBISH REMOVAL 04/18/00 $67.39 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS RUBBISH REMOVAL 04/18/00 $23.99 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS RUBBISH REMOVAL 04/18/00 $81.53 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS RUBBISH REMOVAL < *> $3,329.93* 209405 04/18/00 $352.06 ASPLUND COFFEE HOT CHOCOLATE & COFFE < *> $352.06* 209406 04/18/00 $425.00 ASSESSORS EDUCATION SOCI IAAO COURSE 112 - P. < *> $425.00* 209407 04/18/00 $294.00 AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES GRANT - CDPD < *> $294.00* 209408 04/18/00 $55.89 AUGIE'S INC. FOOD 04/18/00 -$1.11 AUGIE'S INC. BRATWURST 04/18/00 $35.77 AUGIE'S INC. FOOD 04/18/00 $39.78 AUGIE'S INC. SANDWICHES < *> $130.33* 209409 04/18/00 $798.75 BADGER METER INC SERVICE AGREEMENT < *> $798.75* 209410 04/18/00 $90.00 BANKERS SERVICE CO. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES < *> $90.00* 209411 04/18/00 $172.40 BATTERY WHOLESALE INC. CART BATTERIES < *> $172.40* 209412 04/18/00 $228.00 BEARCOM BATTERIES < *> $228.00* 209413 04/18/00 $75.00 BEARTH, NATALIE ANN ALCOHOL COMPLIANCE DE < *> $75.00* 209414 04/18/00 $968.58 BELDING SPORTS INC. MERCHANDISE < *> $968.58* 209415 04/18/00 $45.36 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 04/18/00 $75.00 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 04/18/00 $51.00 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 04/18/00 $107.26 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 12- APR -2000 (13:56) page 2 NVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 40100 CITY HALL GENE RUBBISH REMOVA 40100 GENERAL MAINT RUBBISH REMOVA 40100 PW BUILDING RUBBISH REMOVA 40100 FIRE DEPT. GEN RUBBISH REMOVA 40100 FIRE.SUPPLIES RUBBISH REMOVA 40100 ARENA BLDG /GRO RUBBISH REMOVA 40100 GOLF DOME RUBBISH REMOVA 40100 MAINT OF COURS RUBBISH REMOVA 40100 CLUB HOUSE RUBBISH REMOVA 40100 ART CENTER BLD RUBBISH REMOVA 40100 LITTER REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVA 40100 ED BUILDING & RUBBISH REMOVA 40100 VERNON OCCUPAN RUBBISH REMOVA 40100 YORK OCCUPANCY RUBBISH REMOVA 40100 50TH ST OCCUPA RUBBISH REMOVA 40100 LITTER REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVA 30218 CENTENNIAL LAK COST OF GD SOL 2061 40700 ASSESSING CONF & SCHOOLS 32400 COPS MORE GRAN EQUIP REPLACEM 9404 FRED RICHARDS COST OF GD SOL 6324 9478 FRED RICHARDS COST OF GD SOL 6324 9603 FRED RICHARDS COST OF GD SOL 6324 9863 FRED RICHARDS COST OF GD SOL 6324 518148 METER READING CONTR REPAIRS 1003 7991 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI 8973 GOLF CARS REPAIR PARTS 6563 1494690 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 3798 032400 POLICE DEPT. G INSP. EXP. 313678 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6221 31525100 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 18569900 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 18570100 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 31588800 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX COUNCIL CHECK R- .STER 12- APR -2000 (1: .) page 3 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------I------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 209415 04/18/00 - $70.87 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF.GOODS SOLD MI 3160980050TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 04/18/00 $87.34 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 31626900 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 04/18/00 $529.25 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 18656100 YORK SELLING CST OF CD WINE 04/18/00 $48.08 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 31657500 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 04/18/00 $77.63 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 31657600 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $950.05* 209416 04/18/00 $907.65 BENN, BRADLEY CONFERENCE 041000 ART CENTER ADM CONF & SCHOOLS 04/18/00 $86.40 BENN, BRADLEY CRAFT SUPPLIES 041000 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES < *> $994.05* 209417 04/18/00 $35.00 BEREND, NANCY SKATING LESSON REFUND 033100 EDINB /CL PROG LESSON PRGM IN < *> $35.00* 209420 04/18/00 $12.29 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 7378110 POLICE DEPT. G OFFICE SUPPLIE 3128 04/18/00 $65.36 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT GENERAL SUPPLIES 7523490 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI.3172 04/18/00 $87.79 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 7525670 FIRE DEPT. GEN OFFICE SUPPLIE 3792 04/18/00 $70.24 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT REMODELING 7528380, CITY HALL EQUIP REPLACEM 4704 04/18/00 - $19.59 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT RETURN CM747874 PARK ADMIN. GENERAL SUPPLI 04/18/00 $58.16 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT TAPE FOR LABELMAKER 7532370 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 5949 04/18/00 $11.13 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 7536000 FINANCE GENERAL SUPPLI 04/18/00 $30.33 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 7536000 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI 04/18/00 $235.20 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 7536000 ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLI 04118/00 $4.00 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 7536000 PARK ADMIN. GENERAL SUPPLI 04/18/00 - $12.94 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES CM751989 ASSESSING' GENERAL SUPPLI 04/18/00 $57.78 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 7540520 PWKS ADMIN GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 04/18/00 $16.83 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 7540520 PARK ADMIN. . GENERAL SUPPLI 04/18/00 $26.53 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT FILE CARDS 7542350 GOLF ADMINISTR OFFICE SUPPLIE 6484 04/18/00 $44.63 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 7548700 FIRE DEPT. GEN OFFICE SUPPLIE 3805 04/18/00 $39.38 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT FILES 7552000 FIRE DEPT. GEN OFFICE SUPPLIE 3805 04/18/00 $22.74 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT MOUSEKLEEN KIT 7542351 GOLF ADMINISTR OFFICE SUPPLIE 6484 04/18/00 $5.43 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT GENERAL SUPPLIES 7557990 PARK ADMIN. GENERAL SUPPLI 04/18/00 $13.18 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT GENERAL SUPPLIES 7557990 INSPECTIONS GENERAL SUPPLI 04/18/00 $4.60 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT GENERAL SUPPLIES 7557990 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI 04/18/00 $21.25 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT GENERAL SUPPLIES 7557990 ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLI 04/18/00 $7.40 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT GENERAL SUPPLIES 7557990 FINANCE GENERAL SUPPLI 04/18/00 $59.86 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT GENERAL SUPPLIES 7557990 ENGINEERING GE GENERAL SUPPLI 04/18/00 $359.35 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT REPAIR PARTS 7561720 POLICE DEPT. G REPAIR PARTS 3186 04/18/00 $69.44 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT GENERAL SUPPLIES 7561950 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI 3186 04/18/00 $34.24 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 7557991 PARK ADMIN. GENERAL SUPPLI 04/18/00 $132.90 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT GENERAL SUPPLIES 7561951 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI 3186 < *> $1,457.51* 209421 04/18/00 $23.41 BEST BUY COMPANY INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 00504126 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL _SUPPLI 3110 04/18/00 $331.16 BEST BUY COMPANY INC. NEW EQUIPMENT 28105000 MEDIA LAB NEW EQUIP 9041 < *> $354.57* 209422 04/18/00 $235.71 BIERMAIER, MARK CONTINUING ED (EMT) 032800 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $235.71* 209423 04/18/00 $143.78 BIG RIVER DELI & SANDWIC CONTINUING EDUCATION 041000 POLICE DEPT: G CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $143.78* 209424 04/18/00 $100.00 BLUE LINE LEARNING GROUP CONTINUING ED (TRAINI 032800 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $100.00* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 12- APR -2000 (13:56) page 4 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 209425 04/18/00 $609.37 BOYER TRUCK PARTS SPRINGS, U -BOLT, PINS 126749 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5807 04/18/00 $77.23 BOYER TRUCK PARTS SWITCH ASSEMBLY 127518 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5814 04/18/00 $62.94 BOYER TRUCK PARTS PINS 127590 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5814 04/18/00 $20.49 BOYER TRUCK PARTS SWITCH ASSEMBLY 128597 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5821 < *> $770.03* 209426 04/18/00 $50,195.00 BOYER TRUCKS SALES & SER DUMP TRUCK X1909S EQUIPMENT REPL EQUIP REPLACEM 3965 < *> $50,195.00* 209427 04/18/00 $213.52 BRAEMAR PRINTING PRINT RAIN CHECKS 53620 GOLF ADMINISTR PRINTING 6471 < *> $213.52* 209428 04/18/00 $38.34 BRENTS.SIGNS AND DISPLAY SIGN 00001446 FRED RICHARDS GENERAL SUPPLI 6474 < *> $38.34* 209429 04/18/00 $160.00 BROOKS, JOHN REIMBURSEMENT FOR WOR 032900 FIRE DEPT. GEN UNIF ALLOW < *> $160.00* 209430 04/18/00 $105.42 BROWNELLS INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 01664007 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI 3177 04/18/00 $6.37 BROWNELLS INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 01664007 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI 3177 < *> $111.79* 209431 04/18/00 $37,935.20 BROWNING FERRIS INDUSTRI RECYCLING 70000780 RECYCLING Recycling Char < *> $37,935.20* 209432 04/18/00 $5,184.73 BROWNING FERRIS INDUSTRI REFUSE 10936570 50TH STREET RU PROF SERVICES <*> $5,184.73* 209433 04/18/00 $275.00 BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFFAI SUBSCRIPTION 03/03 ADMINISTRATION DUES & SUBSCRI 04/18/00 $990.00 BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFFAI SUBSCRIPTION 030300 ADMINISTRATION DUES & SUBSCRI < *> $1,265.00* 209434 04/18/00 $10.00 BURROWS, JEFF OVERPAID POOL PASS 032900 SWIM PROG SEASON TICKETS < *> $10.00* 209435 04/18/00 $75.00 BYMARK, KATE ALCOHOL COMPLIANCE DE 032400 POLICE DEPT. G INSP. EXP. < *> $75.00* 209436 04/18/00 $48.54 CALIBRE PRESS INC. CONTINUING ED (TRAINI 040700 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $48.54* 209437 04/18/00 $97.62 CALL ONE INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 367624 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $97.62* 209438 04/18/00 $82.94 CAPITOL RUBBER STAMP CO. BLDG DEPT REVIEW STAM 10882 INSPECTIONS GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $82.94* 209439 04/18/00 $418.55 CARLSON PRINTING BUSINESS CARDS 00073768 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI 04/18/00 $842.95 CARLSON PRINTING BUSINESS CARDS 00073787 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $1,261.50* 209440 04/18/00 $83.07 CATCO FITTINGS 3 -25500 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5817 < *> $83.07* 209441 04/18/00 $516.12 CHECK EQUIPMENT INC. REPAIR TO FREEZER 14785 CENTENNIAL LAK CONTR REPAIRS 2039 COUNCIL CHECK RL_,STER 12- APR -2000 (1- ) page 5 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 209441 04/18/00 $772.27 CHECK EQUIPMENT INC. REPLACE COMPRESSOR 14786 CENTENNIAL LAK CONTR REPAIRS 2053 < *> $1,288.39* 209442 04/18/00 $15.99 CHIEF SUPPLY CORPORATION GENERAL SUPPLIES 10250872 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI 3127 < *> $15.99* 209443 04/18/00 $500.00 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON CHEMICAL HEALTH LETTE 032200 COMMUNICATIONS POSTAGE < *> $500.00* 209444 04/18/00 $189.75 CITY OF RICHFIELD LIGHT & POWER 9602159 GENERAL STORM LIGHT & POWER < *> $189.75* 209445 04/18/00 $15.71 CITY WIDE WINDOW SERVICE WINDOW CLEANING 155092 50TH ST OCCUPA CONTR REPAIRS 04/18/00 $25.56 CITY WIDE WINDOW SERVICE WINDOW CLEANING 155092 YORK OCCUPANCY CONTR REPAIRS 04/18/00 $15.71 CITY WIDE WINDOW SERVICE WINDOW CLEANING 155092 VERNON OCCUPAN CONTR REPAIRS < *> $56.98* 209446 04/18/00 $82.35 CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP. ALTERNATOR BELT 23768 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 5956 < *> $82.35* 209447 04/18/00 $10.00 CLARK, RITA SAFETY CAMP REFUND 040500 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F < *> $10.00* 209448 04/18/00 $346.13 COMMERCIAL FURNITURE BRO CHAIR 00715085 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP REPLACEM 3158 04/18/00 $346.13 COMMERCIAL FURNITURE BRO CHAIR 00715087 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP.REPLACEM 3161 < *> $692.26* 209449 04/18/00 $166.76 COMMERCIAL POOL & SPA SU CHLORINE, MURIATIC AC 0107197- POOL TRACK GRE CHEMICALS 2207 04/18/00 $65.51 COMMERCIAL POOL & SPA SU CHLORINE 0107490- POOL TRACK GRE CHEMICALS 2216 < *> $232.27* 209450 04/18/00 $55.26 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPOR BIT. PLANT INSPECTION PA000036 SKYLINE DRIVE CIP < *> $55.26* 209451 04/18/00 $758.34 COMPUSA INC. ADOBE ACRO /PAGEMAKER 90509024 COMMUNICATIONS NEW EQUIP 4686 04/18/00 $33.02 COMPUSA INC. QUICKEN 2000 90509024 FINANCE EQUIP REPLACEM 04/18/00 $28.76 COMPUSA INC. MOUSE W /WHEEL 90509024 INSPECTIONS EQUIP REPLACEM 04/18/00 $100.36 COMPUSA INC. 4 -PORT SEPERATOR BOX 90526484 GOLF ADMINISTR EQUIP REPLACEM 4699 < *> $920.48* 209452 04/18/00 $64.69 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS GAS CAN 01183172 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 5372 < *> $64.69* 209453 04/18/00 $154.92 COPY EQUIPMENT INC. PLOTTER SUPPLIES 0160816 ENGINEERING GE BLUE PRINTING 4694 < *> $154.92* 209454 04/18/00 $693.95 CORPORATE ADVERTISING & CHAMPIONSHIP T- SHIRTS 97308 EDINA ATHLETIC GENERAL SUPPLI 4641 04/18/00 $718.76 CORPORATE ADVERTISING & CHAMPIONSHIP SWEATSHI 97309 EDINA ATHLETIC GENERAL SUPPLI 4641 < *> $1,412.71* - 209455 04/18/00 $314.18 COVERALL OF THE TWIN CIT MONTHLY SERVICE - APR 00000484 ART CENTER BLD PROF SERVICES < *> $314.18* 209456 04/18/00 $72.08 CRUCIAL TECHNOLOGY DATA PROCESSING 517672 POLICE DEPT. G DATA PROCESSIN 3173 04/18/00 $704.59 CRUCIAL TECHNOLOGY DATA PROCESSING 527477 POLICE DEPT. G DATA PROCESSIN 3180 'OUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 12-APR-2000.(13:56) page 6. 'HECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION DNVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------ <*> $776.67 209457 04/18/00 $186.56 CURTIS 1000 ENVELOPES 31576701 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI 4689 < *> $186.56* 209458 04/16/00 $151.00 CUSTOM REFRIGERATION INC FIXED ICE MACHINE 33076 POOL TRACK GRE CONTR REPAIRS 2202 < *> $151.00* 209459 04/18/00 $279.68 DANKO EMERGENCY EQUIPMEN FIRE BOOT 3'20063 DISTRIBUTION REPAIR PARTS 5696 < *> $279.68* 209460 04/18/00 $683.29 DATREK PROFESSIONAL BAGS MERCHANDISE 601359 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6208 < *> $683.29* 209461 04/18/00 $373.60 DAVID GEOFFREY & ASSOCIA GOLF BALLS 0980686 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6204 < *> $373.60* 209462 04/18/00 $253.00 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 90498 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 04/18/00 $1,634.55 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 90702 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 04/18/00 $1,451.35 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 90703 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 04/18/00 $2,752.00 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS,SOLD BE 90880 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 04/18/00 $307.20 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 91024 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 04/18/00 $562.00 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 91221 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 04/18/00 $2,066.15 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 91486 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 04/18/00 $2,618.05 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 91487 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 04/18/00 $18.40 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 91488 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $11,662.70* 209463 04/18/00 $822.51 DCA INC. FEE FOR SERVICE 305654 CENT SVC GENER HOSPITALIZATIO < *> $822.51* 209464 04/18/00 $63.72 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKEREY BAKERY 31704 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6329 04/18/00 $48.80 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKEREY BAKERY 31883 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6329 04/18/00 $41.82 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKEREY BAKERY 31976 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6329 04/18/00 $13.24 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKEREY BAKERY 31977 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6329 04/18/00 $21.89 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKEREY BAKERY 32199 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6329 04/18/00 $18.25 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKEREY BAKERY 32251 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6329 < *> $207.72* 209466 04/18/00 $73.80 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRA TELEPHONE 10002065 SKATING & HOCK TELEPHONE 04/18/00 $110.22 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRA TELEPHONE 00002065 COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 04/18/00 $60.04 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRA TELEPHONE W0002065 50TH ST OCCUPA TELEPHONE 04/18/00 $91.62 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRA TELEPHONE W0002065 YORK OCCUPANCY TELEPHONE 04/18/00 $61.80 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRA TELEPHONE 10002065 VERNON OCCUPAN TELEPHONE 04/18/00 $45.03 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRA HISTORICAL 10002065 BUILDING MAINT TELEPHONE 04/18/00 $15.01 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRA ARNESON W0002065 BUILDING MAINT TELEPHONE 04/18/00 $15.01 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRA GREENHOUSE W0002065 BUILDING MAINT TELEPHONE 04/18/00 $29.16 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRA CARD ACCESS -PARKS 10002065 BUILDING MAINT TELEPHONE 04/18/00 $30.42 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRA TELEPHONE 10002065 SENIOR CITIZEN TELEPHONE 04/18/00 $44.60 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRA TELEPHONE 10002065 POOL OPERATION TELEPHONE 04/18/00 $92.22 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRA TELEPHONE 10002065 YORK FIRE STAT TELEPHONE .04/18/00 $75.05 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRA TELEPHONE W0002065 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE 04/18/00 $109.93 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRA TELEPHONE W0002065 ART CENTER,BLD TELEPHONE 04/18/00 $239.71 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRA. TELEPHONE W0002065 ED ADMINISTRAT TELEPHONE 04/18/00 $14.58 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRA TELEPHONE 10002065 ARENA BLDG /GRO TELEPHONE COUNCIL CHECK Ri.. STER $55.00 DISTRICT COURT ADMINISTR JUVENILLE WARRANT #55 041000 12- APR -2000 (1- ) page 7 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.---------------------------------------------- 209466 04/18/00 $80.74 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRA TELEPHONE W0002065 GOLF DOME TELEPHONE MERCHANDISE 04/18/00 $76.60 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRA PHONE W0002066 CLUB HOUSE TELEPHONE < *> MERCHANDISE $1,265.54* PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6215 < *> 209467 04/18/00 $660.00 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAF'TELETYPE SERVICE P07MN027 POLICE DEPT. G_TELETYPE SERVI < *.> $180.00 $660.00* KEYLESS ENTRY SYSTEM 114539 KEYLESS ENTRY PROF SERVICES 7084 209468 04/18/00 $159.72 DESHLER, BRANDON CELLULAR - .PATROL 033100 PATROL TELEPHONE < *> $159.72* 209469 04/18/00 209470 04/18/00 209471 04/18/00 04/18/00 $1,491.00 $1,491.00* $180.25 $180.25* $128.87 $76.68 $205.55* DESQ OFFICE CUPBOARDS DIAMOND ART & CRAFT DIST POTTERY TOOL KIT DISPLAY SALES DISPLAY SALES 01 -2484 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 3793 189700 ART SUPPLY GIF COST OF GD SOL 9195 REPAIR FLAGS 1229 FLAG 1332 ARENA BLDG /GRO CONTR REPAIRS 8062 GOLF ADMINISTR GENERAL SUPPLI 6492 209472 04/18/00 $55.00 DISTRICT COURT ADMINISTR JUVENILLE WARRANT #55 041000 GENERAL FD PRO DUE TO OTHR GO < *> $55.00* 209473 04/18/00 $268.40 DON BETZEN GOLF CO. MERCHANDISE 10523 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6215 04/18/00 $707.80 DON BETZEN GOLF CO. MERCHANDISE 10588 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6215 < *> $976.20* 209474 04/18/00 $180.00 DON HARSTAD CO INC KEYLESS ENTRY SYSTEM 114539 KEYLESS ENTRY PROF SERVICES 7084 < *> $180.00 *. 209475 04/18/00 209476 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 209478 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 $4,068.63 $4,068.63* $703.00 $442.20 $1,946.52 $21 -7.75 $523.05 $197.32 $1,167.67 $5,197.51* $1,097.40 $4,410.65 $126.00 $50.00 $3,032.35 $5,000.00 $3,856.50 $4,827.45 $12.15 $2,775.30. $4,236.00 $44'.00 $125.00 DPC- INDUSTRIES EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAST SIDE BEVERAGE EAST SIDE BEVERAGE EAST SIDE BEVERAGE EAST.SIDE BEVERAGE EAST SIDE BEVERAGE EAST SIDE BEVERAGE EAST SIDE BEVERAGE EAST SIDE BEVERAGE EAST SIDE BEVERAGE EAST SIDE BEVERAGE EAST SIDE BEVERAGE EAST SIDE BEVERAGE EAST SIDE BEVERAGE WATER CHEMICALS 7000 -135 WATER TREATMEN WATER TRTMT SU 1549 COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 195297 SOLD WI 195303 SOLD WI 195308 SOLD WI 1000 SOLD WI 198620 SOLD WI 198627 SOLD WI 198632 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 607936 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 607938 BEER 028637 BEER 608380 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 608516 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 608517 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 609090 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 611510 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 611511 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 611517 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 611786 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 611787 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 612092 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD,WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE FRED RICHARDS CST OF GDS BEE 6330 FRED RICHARDS CST OF GDS BEE 6330 YORK SELLING CST.OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE' VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 2OUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 12- APR -2000 (13:56) page 8 -'HECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT ---- _- - - - - -- VENDOR --------- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION ------ ZNVOICE- PROGRAM OBJECT -- - - - PO NUM - -- ----------- $29,592.80* 209479 04/18/00 $121.09 ECOLAB PEST ELIMINATION PEST CONTROL 6701825 CENTENNIAL LAK SVC CONTR EQUI 04/18/00 $102.67 ECOLAB PEST ELIMINATION SPRAY FOR BUGS 6701831 POOL TRACK GRE SVC CONTR EQUI < *> $223.76* 209480 04/18/00 $61.88 EDINA CLEANERS CLEANING OF LINENS 145635,1 CENTENNIAL LAK LAUNDRY 2220 < *> $61.88* 209481 04/18/00 $342.57 EDTECH MODEM, CABLE, MEMORY 101002 FINANCE EQUIP REPLACEM 4676 < *> $342.57* 209482 04/18/00 $1,000.00 EKLUND TREE RECYCLING GOLF COURSE BRUSH 040100 MAINT OF COURS RUBBISH REMOVA 5735 < *> $1,000.00* 209483 04/18/00 $44.53 EMED COMPANY INC CHEMICAL STORAGE SIGN 644667 -0 GENERAL TURF C GENERAL SUPPLI 5742 < *> $44.53* 209484 04/18/00 $1,344.22 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAIN T -90 REPAIRS 3654 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONTR REPAIRS < *> $1,344.22* 209485 04/18/00 $226.76 EMOTORSPORTS INC. REPAIR PARTS 001036 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 6564 < *> $226.76* 209486 04/18/00 $67,354.12 ENCOMM MIDWEST LLC CONTRACT PAYMENT #5 041800 UTILITY PROG CIP < *> $67,354.12* 209487 04/18/00 $1,799.23 EVERGREEN LAND SERVICES EASEMENT ACQUISITION 00 -271 SANITARY SEWER CIP 04/18/00 $534.85 EVERGREEN LAND SERVICES CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 00 -285 TH 169 FRONTAG CIP < *> $2,334.08* 209488 04/18/00 $2,512.00 EXPERT T BILLING MARCH BILLING 040500 FIRE DEPT. GEN PROF SERVICES < *> $2,512.00* 209489 04/18/00 $1,500.00 EXPLORE MINNESOTA GOLF A ADVERTISING 032400 GOLF ADMINISTR DUES 1, SUBSCRI < *> $1,500.00* 209490 04/18/00 $55.66 FARMER BROTHERS COFFEE COFFEE 7847771 FRED RICHARDS COST OF GD SOL 6331 < *> $55.66* 209491 04/18/00 $130.00 FIELDS, KATHLEEN REFUND - CANCELED ARNE 040500 GENERAL FD PRO RENTAL OF PROP < *> $130.00* 209492 04/18/00 $66.80 FIREPLACE CENTER MINNETONKA ADDRESS PERMIT E GENERAL FD PRO MECHAN PERMITS < *> $66.80* 209493 04/18/00 $1,957.50 FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL COMPA SEWER RODS 5648 SEWER CLEANING REPAIR PARTS 5319 < *> $1,957.50* 209494 04/18/00 $288.62 FORMS GROUP, THE PRINTING 00002774 POLICE DEPT. G PRINTING 7594 < *> $288.62* 209495 04/18/00 $169.49 FOWLER ELECTRIC REPAIR PARTS 55082702 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 6283 < *> $169.49* COUNCIL CHECK R—STER 12- APR -2000 (1� j) page 9 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 209496 04/18/00 $44.87 G & K DIRECT PURCHASE UNIFORM PURCHASES 3042671 GENERAL MAINT LAUNDRY 04/18/00 $28.72 G & K DIRECT PURCHASE UNIFORM PURCHASES 3042696 GENERAL MAINT LAUNDRY 04/18/00 $32.61 G & K DIRECT PURCHASE UNIFORM PURCHASES 3042724 BUILDING MAINT LAUNDRY 04/18/00 $866.46 G & K DIRECT PURCHASE UNIFORM PURCHASES 3042960 BUILDING MAINT LAUNDRY 04/18/00 $62.55 G & K DIRECT.PURCHASE UNIFORM PURCHASES 3043590 GENERAL MAINT LAUNDRY < *> $1,035.21* 209497 04/18/00 $186.17 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 033100 ARENA BLDG /GRO LAUNDRY 04/18/00 $39.23 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 033100 CITY HALL GENE LAUNDRY 04/18/00 $78.70 G & K SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES 033100 STREET REVOLVI GENERAL SUPPLI 04/18/00 $190.67 G & K SERVICES CLEANING SUPPLIES. 033100 PW BUILDING CLEANING SUPPL 04/18/00 $104.57 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 033100 PUMP & LIFT ST LAUNDRY 04/18/00 $377.29 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 033100 EQUIPMENT OPER LAUNDRY 04/18/00 $633.40 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 033100 GENERAL MAINT LAUNDRY 04/18/00 $238.85 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 033100 BUILDING MAINT LAUNDRY < *> $1,848.88* 209498 04/18/00 $155.15 GARTNER REFRIGERATION & REPLACED LEAKING VALV 1787 POOL TRACK GRE CONTR REPAIRS 2208 < *> $155.15* 209499 04/18/00 $3,348.55 GE CAPITAL ITS HP 4500 DN PRINTER & 90753454 COMMUNICATIONS NEW EQUIP 4678 04/18/00 $273.59 GE CAPITAL ITS COMPUTER MEMORY 90753454 ADMINISTRATION EQUIP REPLACEM 04/18/00 $8,520.22 GE CAPITAL ITS COMP & MONITOR & SOFT 90763429 FINANCE EQUIP REPLACEM 90751810 04/18/00 $3,069.19 GE CAPITAL ITS COMP & SOFTWARE 90763429 ADMINISTRATION EQUIP REPLACEM . 04/18/00 $559.72 GE CAPITAL ITS MONITOR 90763429 CENT SVC GENER EQUIP REPLACEM < *> $15,771.27* 209500 04/18/00 $1,225.64 GEAR FOR SPORTS MERCHANDISE 10163074 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6206 < *> $1,225.64* 209501 04/18/00 $60.00 GLEN SIPE PIANO SERVICE MONTHLY PIANO TUNING 000403 POOL TRACK GRE SVC CONTR EQUI < *> $60.00* 20950.2 04/18/00 $35.88 GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIES TOOL KIT 40079917 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI 4700 < *> $35.88* 209503 04/18/00 $8,171.64 GO SPORTSMEN'S SUPPLY IN CARBINES 92674 POLICE'DEPT. G EQUIP REPLACEM 3160 < *> $8,171.64* 209504 04/18/00 $58.00 GOLF CLUB HOSPITAL GRIPS 11,129 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6490 < *> $58.00* .209505 04/18/00 $303.00 GOLFCRAFT PRACTICE CLUBS 13308 RANGE GENERAL SUPPLI 6358 < *> $303.00* 209506 04/18/00 $200.00 GONYER, CLIFF CPR INSTRUCTOR RECERT 033100 GOLF ADMINISTR SAFETY EQUIPME < *> $200.00* 209507 04/18/00 $863.00 GRAND -PERE WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 00006878 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $863.00* 209508 04/18/ -00 $85.00 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 30321 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 04/18/00 $426.00 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 30322 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/18/00 $1,169.00 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 30480 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $1,680.00* :OUNCIL CHECK REGISTER $22,479.00 HARRIS HOMEYER CO. PREMIUM 14636 CENT SVC GENER INSURANCE 04/18/00 12- APR -2000 (13:56) page 10. HECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT CENT SVC GENER VENDOR - - DESCRIPTION---- - - -- -- INVOICE - - - -- PROGRAM--- - - - - -- OBJECT--- - - -PO- NUM - - -- -------------------------------- 209509 04/18/00 - - $212.72 - - -- - - - - -- - GRAYBAR ELECTRIC - - - -- ------- CO. BULBS DIE 340906 EQUIPMENT OPER GASOLINE 104 -7269 CENTENNIAL LAK _ GENERAL SUPPLI $7,930.84* 2056 < *> $212.72* 209521 04/18/00 $110.59 HAWKEYE FOODSERVICE DIST FOOD 1559177 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6333 04/18/00 $14.20 209510 04/18/00 $560.00 GREEN ACRES SPRINKLER CO IRRIGATION REPAIRS 6333 001199 FIELD MAINTENA CONTR REPAIRS 5752 < *> $560.00* GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6333 209511 04/18/00 $25.92 GREG LESSMAN TOWELS 19024 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6306 < *> $25.92* 209513 04/18/00 $840.72 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 195301 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU - 04/18/00 $26.09 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 195302 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 04/18/00 $390.99 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 195305 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 04/18/00 $69.10 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 195307 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 04/18/00 $89.75 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 195309 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 04/18/00 $1,422.60 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 195310 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 04/1.8/00 $3,814.77 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 195312 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 04/18/00 $60.20 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 195314 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 04/18/00 $276.36 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 196993 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 04/18/00 $1,167.94 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 196994 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 04/18/00 $64.60 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 197413 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 04/18/00 $517.50 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 198622 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 04/18/00 $1,536.58 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 198623 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 04/18/00 $624.95 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 198624 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 04/18/00 $138.20 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 198626 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 04/18/00 $156.55 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS.SOLD LI 198629 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 04/18/00 $2,479.17 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 198630 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 04/18/00 $3,517.49 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 198634 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 04/18/00 $1,933.14 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU < *> $19,126.70* 1198635 209514 04/18/00 209515 04/18/00 209516 04/18/00 209517 04/18/00 209518 04/18/00 $59.00 GROUNDS MAINTENANCE SERV TRAINING SEMINAR $59.00* $28.90 GYPSUM ASSOCIATION USG DESIGN MANUAL $28.90* 40100 PARK MAINTENAN CONF & SCHOOLS 5905 33100 INSPECTIONS BOOKS & PAMPHL $181.59 HAAGEN DAZS CO, THE ICE CREAM 00823625 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6332 $181.59* $25.00 HADZIMA, DOMINIC REIMBURSEMENT FOR NRE 032900 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONF & SCHOOLS $25.00* $550.18 HARDWOOD CREEK LUMBER IN HUBS & LATH 2759 ENGINEERING GE LUMBER 4693 $550.18* 209519 04/18/00 $22,479.00 HARRIS HOMEYER CO. PREMIUM 14636 CENT SVC GENER INSURANCE 04/18/00 $14,760.00 HARRIS HOMEYER CO. PREMIUM 14637 CENT SVC GENER INSURANCE < *> $37,239.00* 209520 04/18/00 $7,930.84 HARTLAND FUEL PRODUCTS L GAS - UNLEADED AND DIE 340906 EQUIPMENT OPER GASOLINE 1217 < *> $7,930.84* 209521 04/18/00 $110.59 HAWKEYE FOODSERVICE DIST FOOD 1559177 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6333 04/18/00 $14.20 HAWKEYE FOODSERVICE DIST FOOD 1559178 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6333 04/18/00 -$2.80 HAWKEYE FOODSERVICE DIST FOOD CM156112 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6333 COUNCIL CHECK R- -STER 12- APR -2000 (13: page 11 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 209521 04/18/00 $368.87 HAWKEYE FOODSERVICE DIST FOOD FOR RESALE 1569666 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6333 04/18/00 $115.00 HAWKEYE FOODSERVICE DIST PAPER GOODS 1569666 GRILL GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $605.86* 209522 04/18/00 $126.28 HEDGES, DIANA GENERAL SUPPLIES 041000 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $126.28* 209523 04/18/00 $68.75 HEGGIES PIZZA PIZZA 52116 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6334 < *> $68.75* 209524 04/18/00 $134.10 HEIMARK FOODS MEAT 014276 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6335 < *> $134.10* 209525 04/18/00 $747.20 HELLER FINANCE INC MERCHANDISE 11652 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6219 < *> $747.20* 209526 04/18/00 $70.00 HELLICKSON, MICHELE SKATING LESSONS REFUN 033000 EDINB /CL PROG LESSON PRGM IN < *> $70.00* 209527 04/18/00 $493.88 HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL AMBULANCE SUPPLIES - 8227 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 3701 < *> $493.88* 209528 04/18/00 $1,082.07 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF' BOOKING FEE JAN 00 LEGAL SERVICES COURT CHARGES < *> $1,082.07* 209529 04/18/00 $9,266.05 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURE SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 040100 SPECIAL ASSESS EQUIP REPLACEM 04/18/00 $113.50 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURE SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 040100 GENERAL FD PRO DUE FROM HRA < *> $9,379.55* 209530 04/18/00 $14,548.50 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURE TIF ADMIN. FEE 032900 GENERAL FD PRO DUE FROM HRA < *> $14,548.50* 209531 04/18/00 $732.15 HJ GLOVE OF AMERICA GLOVES LS031500 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6305 04/18/00 $671.82 HJ GLOVE OF AMERICA GLOVES LS031500 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6305 < *> $1,403.97* 209532 04/18/00 $55.60 HOLDINGS FINE ACCESSORIE MERCHANDISE 49330 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6441 < *> $55.60* 209533 04/18/00 $81.45 HOME JUICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 55260 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $81.45* 209534 04/18/00 $81.88 HOOFNAGLE, LYLE GALLERY SUPPLIES 041000 ART SUPPLY GIF GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $81.88* 209535 04/18/00 $114.73 HORWATH, TOM MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 041000 TREES & MAINTE MILEAGE < *> $114.73* 209536 04/18/00 $62.35 HOUSEHOLD BANK, F.S.B. ( SUPPLIES 0217 -420 MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPLI 6558 04/18/00 $8.25 HOUSEHOLD BANK, F.S.B. ( PHONE 0217 -420 CLUB HOUSE GENERAL SUPPLI 6483 < *> $70.60* 209537 04/18/00 $85.66 HOYT, JOHN MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 033100 GOLF ADMINISTR MILEAGE < *> $85.66* ,OUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 12- APR -2000 (13:56) page 12 'HECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ----- ------ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 209538 04/18/00 $33.75 HPI INTERNATIONAL INC PHOTOGRAPHIC 180672 POLICE DEPT. G PHOTO SUPPLIES 3183 < *> $33.75* 209539 04/18/00 $250.00 HTE INC. GRANT - PROJ. MGMT. 556378 COPS MORE GRAN EQUIP REPLACEM 04/18/00 $687.50 HTE INC. GRANT- - PROJ. MGMT. 556499 COPS MORE GRAN EQUIP REPLACEM < *> $937.50* 209540 04/18/00 $49.33 HUEBSCH TOWELS, LINENS 995371 POOL TRACK GRE SVC CONTR EQUI 04/18/00 $63.61 HUEBSCH TOWELS, RUGS 100783 POOL TRACK GRE SVC CONTR EQUI < *> $112.94* 209541 04/18/00 $1,152.00 IBM CORPORATION SERVICE CONTRACTS 4096747 POLICE DEPT. G SVC CONTR EQUI < *> $1,152.00* 209542 04/18/00 $66.25 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS FAX TONER CARTRIDGE 2301884A CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI 4705 < *> $66.25* 209543 04/18/00 $62.31 IMPERIAL HEADWEAR INC MERCHANDISE 442329 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6224 04/18/00 $625.53 IMPERIAL HEADWEAR INC MERCHANDISE 443091 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6224 < *> $687.84* 209544 04/18/00 $4,660.62 INACOM -NORTH CENTRAL ARE FIRE - LAPTOP & CAMER 2861158 FIRE DEPARTMEN EQUIP REPLACEM 4638 04/18/00 $44.19 INACOM -NORTH CENTRAL ARE CAMERA CASE 2892038 FIRE DEPARTMEN EQUIP REPLACEM 4638 04/18/00 $51.49 INACOM -NORTH CENTRAL ARE AC ADAPTER - CAMERA 3037649 FIRE DEPARTMEN EQUIP REPLACEM 4638 < *> $4,756.30* 209545 04/18/00 $10.91 INDELCO PLASTIC.CORP TEFLON TAPE, PVC ADAP 205689 FIELD MAINTENA.REPAIR PARTS 5740 04/18/00 $21.30 INDELCO PLASTIC CORP REPAIR PARTS 206005 MAINT OF LOURS REPAIR PARTS 6560 < *> $32.21* 209546 04/18/00 $1,706.58 Innovative Micrographics PRINTING 16045 POLICE DEPT. G PRINTING 3174 < *> $1,706.58* 209547 04/18/00 $69.22 IOS CAPITAL ALARM SERVICE 47019045 ART CENTER BLD ALARM SERVICE < *> $69.22* 209548 04/18/00 $244.00 IVERSON, KATHY WINTER TOBACCO INSTIT 040700 TOBACCO GRANT CONE? & SCHOOLS < *> $244.00* 209549 04/18/00 $40.79 J.R. JOHNSON SUPPLY INC. .NOZZLES, ROPE 27762 POOL TRACK GRE GENERAL SUPPLI 2219 < *> $40.79* 209550 04/18/00 $89.57 JENSEN, THOMAS GENERAL SUPPLIES 033100 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $89.57* 209551 04/18/00 $132.70 JENSON, THOMAS REIMBURSE FOR IAAI TR 032700 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONE? & SCHOOLS < *> $132.70* 209553 04/18/00 $16.28 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 033100 ENGINEERING GE GENERAL SUPPLI 04/18/00 $194.01 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 033100 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 04/18/00 $12.35 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 033100 ST LIGHTING OR GENERAL SUPPLI 04/18/00 $80.75 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 033100 STREET NAME SI GENERAL SUPPLI 04/18/00 $15.97 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 033100 STREET REVOLVI GENERAL SUPPLI 04/18/00 $23.12 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 033100 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI 04/18/00 $186.44 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 033100 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI COUNCIL CHECK h_ _STER CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM 12- APR -2000 (13 OBJECT page 13 PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 209553 04/18/0.0. $5.74 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 033100 PUBLIC HEALTH GENERAL SUPPLI 04/18/00 $28.91 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 033100 CITY HALL GENE GENERAL SUPPLI 04/18/00 $118.35 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 033100 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 04/18/00 $120.14 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 033100 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 04/18/00 $913.86 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 033100 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 04/18/00 $96.82 -JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 033100 GOLF ADMINISTR GENERAL SUPPLI 04/18/00 $32.96 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 033100 RICHARDS MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 04/18/00 $12.38 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 033100 GOLF DOME GENERAL SUPPLI 04/18/00 $46.01 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 033100 ARENA ICE MAIN GENERAL SUPPLI 04/18/00 $1.53 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 033100 ART _CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI 04/18/00 $355.79 JERRY'S 'HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 033100 ED BUILDING& GENERAL SUPPLI 04/18/00 $159.97 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 033100 PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPLI 04/18/00 $48.52 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 033100 VERNON 01CCUPAN GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $2,469.90* 209554 04/18/00 $54.95 JOHN E REID ASSOC CONT. ED. (INTERROGAT 041000 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $54.95* 209558 04/18/00 -$5.51 _ JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 116616 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/18/00 -$9.65 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 117153 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/18/00 -$8.95 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 117154 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/18/00 - $19.89 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 117454 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 04/18/00. -$3.00 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 117723 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/18/00 -$2.86 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 117724 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/18/00 -$6.01 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD. WI 117725 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/18/00 - $6.33 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 117 -726 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/18/00 -$7.35 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 117727 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/18/00 -$7.00 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 117728 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/18/00 $2,592.24 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1097388 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 04/18/00 $529.35 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1097389 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 04/18/00 $1,143.08 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1097390 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/18/00 $2,740.26 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1097391 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 04/18/00 $148.45 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 1097392 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 04/18/00 $776.10 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1097393 VERNON SELLING CST-OF GD WINE 04/18/00 $214.35 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1097394 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/18/00 $362.86 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1097395 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 04/18/00 $986.90 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1097396 YORK SELLING CST OF-GD LIQU 04/18/00 $812.80 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1097397 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/18/00 $199.59 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 1097398 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 04/18/00 $335.83 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1097399 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD-WINE 04/18/00 $1,014.51 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1097400 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/18/00 $477.05 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1097401 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/18/00 - $30.69 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 118060 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/18/00 $594.22 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 10999787 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/18/00 $94.41 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1099988 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 04/18/00 $7,511.86 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1099989 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/18/00 $174.14 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1099991 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 04/18/00 $2,399.50 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1099992 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 04/18/00 $579.74 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1099993 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 04/18/00 $3,262.68 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1099994 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 04/18/00 $86.04 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 1099995 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 04/18/00 $936.15.. JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1099996 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/18/00 $2,230.05 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1099997 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 04/18/00 $94.96 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1099998 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/18/00 $379.90 1JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1099999 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE =NCIL CHECK REGISTER HECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT OF.GDS VENDOR BEE DESCRIPTION - - I - - -i ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 209558 04/18/00 $1,564.78 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1 OF 04/18/00 $641.19 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI -1 GD 04/18/00 $493.45 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1 < *> 27597 $33,269.20* CST OF GD WINE 27598 209559 04/18/00 $67.89 JOHNSON WHOLESALE FLORIS LEAFSHINE, MOSS 6 < *> OF $67.89* WINE 27600 YORK SELLING CST OF 209560 04/18/00 $189.00 JOHNSON, KENDRICK PARTIAL REFUND FOR SE C < *> $189.00* 209561 04/18/00 $92.40 JOHNSON, NAOMI CRAFT SUPPLIES C 04/18/00 $32.52 JOHNSON, NAOMI GENERAL SUPPLIES C 04/18/00 $36.18 JOHNSON, NAOMI CRAFT SUPPLIES FOR ME C < *> $161.10* 209562 04/18/00 $46.07 KASPRICK, JOHN MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE C < *> $46.07* 209563 04/18/00 $2.11 KINKO'S GENERAL SUPPLIES C < *> $2.11* 209564 04/18/00 $255.00 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD BE ] 04/18/00 $77.00 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD BE ,] 04/18/00 $437.50 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD BE ] 04/18/00 $175.00 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 17 04/18/00 $880.85 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 17 04/18/00 $1,834.91 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 04/18/00 $4,309.95 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI I] 04/18/00 $480.00 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 04/18/00 $991.95 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI ] 04/18/00 $890.90 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI ] 04/18/00 $72.00 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 7 < *> $10,405.06* 209565 04/18/00 $35.00 KLOEHN, DOREEN SKATING LESSON REFUND ( < *> $35.00* 209566 04/18/00 $5,000.00 KPMG LLP PROFESSIONAL SERV - A 4 04/18/00 $1,000.00 KPMG LLP PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4 04/18/00 $400.00 KPMG LLP PROFESSIONAL SERV - A 4 04/18/00 $1,500.00 KPMG LLP PROFESSIONAL SERV - A 4 04/18/00 $1,400.00 KPMG LLP PROFESSIONAL SERV - A 4 04/18/00 $1,900.00 KPMG LLP PROFESSIONAL SERV - A 4 04/18/00 $1,900.00 KPMG LLP PROFESSIONAL SERV - A 4 04/18/00 $1,900.00 KPMG LLP PROFESSIONAL SERV - A 4 < *> $15,000.00* 209567 04/18/00 $399.34 KRAUSE, RICKY GENERAL SUPPLIES I < *> $399.34* 209568 04/18/00 $26.01 KREMER SPRING & ALIGNMEN SPRINGS l < *> $26.01* 209569 04/18/00 $35.00 KRUEGER, JOAN SKATING LESSON REFUND I 12- APR -2000 (13:56) page 14 .I]VOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------- 100000 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 100001 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 100640 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 9180 POOL TRACK GRE GENERAL SUPPLI 2219 40600 EDINB /CL PROG SEASON TICKETS 41000 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES 41000 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI 41000 MEDIA LAB CRAFT SUPPLIES 40300 VERNON LIQUOR MILEAGE 6220003 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI 26855 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 26858 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 27055 YORK SELLING CST OF.GDS BEE 27056 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 27277 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 27282 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 27326 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 27597 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 27598 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 27599 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 27600 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 33000 EDINB /CL PROG LESSON PRGM IN 0209051 FINANCE PRO SVC AUDIT 0209051 CDBG PROF SERVICES 0209051 ART CENTER ADM PRO SVC AUDIT 0209051 GOLF ADMINISTR PRO SVC AUDIT 0209051 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC AUDIT 0209051 LIQUOR 50TH ST PRO SVC AUDIT 0209051 LIQUOR YORK GE PRO SVC AUDIT 0209051 VERNON LIQUOR PRO SVC AUDIT 33100 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI 94617 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5960 33100 EDINB /CL PROG LESSON PRGM IN COUNCIL CHECK R. jTER 12- APR -2000 (13:. page 15 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <*> $35.00* 209570 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 209571 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 209572 04/18/00 209573 04/18/00 209574 04/18/00 209575 209576 209577 209578 209579 209581 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 $151.90 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS $836.80 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS $1,944.75 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS $88.45 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS $1,054.05 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS $36.00 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS $1,503.25 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS $5,615.20* $123.90 LANDS' END CORPORATE SAL LOGO SHIRTS - $52'.90 LANDS' END CORPORATE SAL RETURN LOGO S $45.70 LANDS' END CORPORATE SAL LOGO SHIRTS $116.70* $330.50 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. NUTS & BOLTS $330.50* $16.75 LEEF SERVICES TOWELS $16.75* $1,810.67 $1,810.67* $419.00 $419.00* $313.00 $313.00* $113.00 $113.00* $319.32 $319.32* $186.38 $186.38* $941.90 $27.00 $1,677.50 $30.40 $42.50 $1,948.40 $75.00 $36.40 $1,269.45 $92.00 $494.45 $47.20 $40.95 $2,142.30 $15.20 LEITNER COMPANY LINE -X SOIL SOLD MI 264568 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX SOLD BE 264569 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE SOLD BE 264691 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE SOLD MI 264699 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX SOLD BE 265199 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE SOLD MI 265200 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX SOLD BE 265243 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 01116192 LIQUOR 50TH ST GENERAL SUPPLI 3IRTS 01118941 LIQUOR YORK GE GENERAL SUPPLI 01122180 LIQUOR YORK GE GENERAL SUPPLI 1280316 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI 2050 210987 MAINT OF LOURS LAUNDRY SPRAY ON LINER LIVEWARE PUBLISHING INC. SOFTWARE UPGRADE MACKEY, SHANNON MAIL HANDLING SERVICES MARCOM DIRECT MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES 04/01 ST MAINT OF COURS SOD & DIRT 6383 47 -208 EQUIPMENT REPL EQUIP REPLACEM 5827 5610 FINANCE EQUIP REPLACEM 4682 CLASS REFUND 032900 ART CNTR PROG REGISTRATION F HYDRANT FLUSHING CARD 061708 DISTRIBUTION CONTR REPAIRS 1009 INFORMATIONAL CARDS 1147 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 129296 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 129297 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 129599 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 129614 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 129615 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 129616 BEER 130190 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 132083 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 132280 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 132281 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 132282 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 132283 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 132466 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 132467 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 132468 COMMUNICATIONS CONTR SERVICES 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE FRED RICHARDS CST OF GDS BEE 6337 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 12- APR -2000 (13:56) page 16 HECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM --- ---- ---- ------ ----------- - ---- --- ------ ---- --- -- ----- --- - ----------------- 209581 - - 04/18/00 - - - - - - ------- $677.20 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 132469 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 04/18/00 $2,583.60 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 1132484 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 04/18/00 $92.00 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 1132485 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 04/18/00 $140.00 MARK VII SALES BEER 1134209 GRILL CST OF GDS BEE 6337 04/18/00 $1,189.35 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 1134802 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 04/18/00 $39.80 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 1134803 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 04/18/00 $8.00 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 1134804 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 04/18/00 $771.60 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 1134805 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 04/18/00 $13.25 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 1134806 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX < *> $14,395.45* 209582 04/18/00 $129.95 MARSHALL & SWIFT RESIDENTIAL COST HAND -31700 ASSESSING DUES & SUBSCRI < *> $129.95* 209583 04/18/00 $25.00 MARSTON, STEVE CONTINUING ED (BCA - 032800 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $25.00* 209584 04/18/00 $812.00 MARTIN- MCALLISTER CLINICAL EVALUATION 1058 FIRE DEPT. GEN PROF SERVICES < *> $812.00* 209585 04/18/00 $110.64 MATHISON CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD 197491 -1 ART SUPPLY GIF COST OF GD SOL 9157 04/18/00 $54.57 MATHISON CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD 403122 -0 ART SUPPLY GIF COST OF GD SOL 9197 < *> $165.21* 209586 04/18/00 $43.60 MAUTZ PAINT CO. SUPPLIES 59012398 MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPLI 6562 < *> $43.60* 209587 04/18/00 $550.19 MAXFLI GOLF DIVISION MERCHANDISE 2152235 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6216 < *> $550.19* 209588 04/18/00 $35.60 MCKENZIE, TOM CONTINUING EDUCATION 040700 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $35.60* 209589 04/18/00 $856.00 MDS MATRX MEDICAL INC AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 696721 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 3797 < *> $856.00* 209590 04/18/00 $327.10 MEDICA CHOICE AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 040500 GENERAL FD PRO AMBULANCE FEES < *> $327.10* 209591 04/18/00 $472.24 MEDICA PRIMARY AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 04/05 GENERAL FD PRO AMBULANCE FEES 04/18/00 $347.50 MEDICA PRIMARY AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 040500 GENERAL FD PRO AMBULANCE FEES < *> $819.74* 209592 04/18/00 $777.00 MEDTRONIC PHYSIO CONTROL SERVICE CONTRACT IV575374 POLICE DEPT. G SVC CONTR EQUI 04/18/00 $711.00 MEDTRONIC PHYSIO CONTROL UFEPAK MAINT. IV575392 FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP MAINT 3702 < *> $1,488.00* 209593 04/18/00 $124.61 MENARDS ACCT #35170288 BLOWER /VAC 29228 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI 2055 04/18/00 $99.59 MENARDS ACCT #35170288 LIGHT FIXTURES, LOPPE 29279 POOL TRACK GRE GENERAL SUPPLI 2227 < *> $224.20* 209594 04/18/00 $181.64 MENARDS * ACCT #30240251 SUPPLIES 77815 MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPLI 6557 04/18/00 $27.36 MENARDS * ACCT #30240251 LIGHTS CLUB HOUSE GENERAL SUPPLI 6469 < *> $209.00* 18860 COUNCIL CHECK K STER 12- APR -2000 (13. page 17 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 209595 04/18/00 $408.96 MERIT SUPPLY CHLORINE 53298 PUMP & LIFT ST REPAIR PARTS 5942 04/18/00 $655.40 MERIT SUPPLY GLASS CLEANER, SHAMPO 53303 POOL TRACK GRE CLEANING SUPPL 2215 04/18/00 $656.79 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 53412 ARENA BLDG /GRO CLEANING SUPPL 8087 < *> $1,721.15* 209596 04/18/00 $342.50 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY ANCHORS, CHALKER, RAK 41876 FIELD MAINTENA GENERAL SUPPLI 5749 < *> $342.50* 209597 04/18/00 $40.00 MGA REGISTRATION FOR MGA 041000 GOLF ADMINISTR CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $40.00* 209598 04/18/00 $3,840.00 MICHALKO, JIM BRIDGE INSPECTION 004 ENGINEERING GE PROF SERVICES < *> $3,840.00* 209599 04/18/00 $97.66 MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 18487 ART CENTER BLD CLEANING SUPPL 9001 < *> $97.66* 209600 04/18/00 $38.00 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI COKE 61804144 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6327 04/18/00 $192.50 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI COKE 61804151 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6327 04/18/00 $116.16 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 62142125 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 04/18/00 $114.00 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI COKE 66422140 FRED RICHARDS COST OF GD SOL 6327 04/18/00 $236.15 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI COKE 66422157 FRED RICHARDS COST OF GD SOL 6327 04/18/00 $93.28 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 60096042 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 04/18/00 $377.75 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI COKE 67009128 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6327 04/18/00 $445.04 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 65146090 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $1,612.88* 209601 04/18/00 $600.00 MIDWEST SODA BLASTERS SODA BLASTING & GRAFF 032800 CENTENNIAL LAK CONTR REPAIRS 2060 < *> $600.00* 209602 04/18/00 $275.15 MINN COMM PAGING PAGER SERVICE 30343004 POOL TRACK GRE SVC CONTR EQUI < *> $275.15* 209603 04/18/00 $105.00 MINNEAPOLIS AREA ASSOC O MULTIPULE LISTING SER 1062824 ASSESSING DUES & SUBSCRI < *> $105.00* 209604 04/18/00 $9,239.40 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPA WATER PURCHASE 040400 DISTRIBUTION WATER PURCHASE < *> $9,239.40* 209605 04/18/00 $33.97 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPA CO2 653021 FRED RICHARDS GENERAL SUPPLI 6493 < *> $33.97* 209606 04/18/00 $25.88 MINNESOTA CLAY USA CRAFT SUPPLIES 55099 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES 9189 < *> $25.88* 209607 04/18/00 $250.00 MINNESOTA COUNTIES INSUR FEE FOR SERVICE 001395 CENT SVC GENER ADVERT PERSONL < *> $250.00* 209608 04/18/00 $135.00 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONT GUN RANGE 032800 ENGINEERING GE PROF SERVICES < *> $135.00* 209609 04/18/00 $220.00 MINNESOTA SHREDDING LLC. PROF. SERV. 25253792 POLICE DEPT. G PROF SERVICES 3176 < *> $220.00* 209610 04/18/00 $20.00 MINNESOTA WANNER ALUMINUM 0043658- FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 3782 :OUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 12- APR -2000 (13:56) page 18 :HECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------;------------------------------------------------- 209610 04/18/00 $46.01 MINNESOTA WANNER VALVE CHAMBER KIT 0043673- FIELD MAINTENA REPAIR PARTS 5726 < *> $66.01* 209611 04/18/00 $544.00 MIZUNO USA INC GOLF CLUBS 0251473 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6360 < *> $544.00* 209612 04/18/00 $1,350.00 MN P.O.S.T. LICENSE RENEWAL FEES 040700 POLICE DEPT. G LIC & PERMITS < *> $1,350.00* 209613 04/18/00 $45.00 MN PESTICIDE INFORMATION PESTICIDE TRAINING 040600 PARK MAINTENAN CONF & SCHOOLS 5916 < *> $45.00* 209614 04/18/00 $615.98 MODERN -TECH INC. ENERGY MGMT. REPAIR 2114 POOL TRACK GRE CONTR REPAIRS 2212 < *> $615.98* 209615 04/18/00 $70.00 MOE, MARILYN A. INTERPRETER 00 -639 HUMAN RELATION EDUCATION PRGM 4701 < *> $70.00* 209616 04/18/00 $66.30.' MOORE MEDICAL AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 91403658 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 3784 < *> $66.30* 209617 04/18/00 $23.00 MPCA WASTEWATER LICENSE RE 040400 TRAINING LIC & PERMITS < *> $23.00* 209618 04/18/00 $85.60 MPLS DEPT OF HEALTH & FA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 00 -0407 POLICE DEPT. G PROF SERVICES < *> $85.60* 209619 04/18/00 $57,967.97 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO NEW MOWERS (CAPITAL)- 2950,285 GOLF PROG MACH. & EQUIP 7073 04/18/00 $283.53 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO IRRIGATION PARTS 6917 -00 CENTENNIAL LAK REPAIR PARTS 2054 04/18/00 - $46.38 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO CREDIT 6919 -00 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI 2054 04/18/00 $79.83 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO REPAIR PARTS 7091 -00 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 6565 04/18/00 $27.78 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO IRRIGATION PARTS 7499 -00 CENTENNIAL LAK REPAIR PARTS 2062 04/18/00 $23.98 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO IRRIGATION PARTS 7795 -00 FIELD MAINTENA REPAIR PARTS 5915 < *> $58,336.71* 209620 04/18/00 $62.62 MUNICILITE CO BULBS 354 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5826 < *> $62.62* 209621 04/18/00 $12.00 MUZAK MUSIC SERVICE A251983 CENTENNIAL LAK SVC CONTR EQUI < *> $12.00* 209622 04/18/00 $319.45 NATIONAL CAMERA EXCHANGE REPAIR T.V. LOBBY 040400 ARENA BLDG /GRO CONTR REPAIRS 8085 < *> $319.45* 209623 04/18/00 $33.92 NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCI BOOK 021600 ADMINISTRATION DUES & SUBSCRI < *> $33.92* 209624 04/18/00 $155.00 NCRAAO 25 SEMINAR 040700 ASSESSING CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $155.00* 209625 04/18/00 $320.00 NELSON, BARBARA MEDIA PROF. SERV. 041000 MEDIA LAB PROF SERVICES < *> $320.00* 209626 04/18/00 $35.00 Nelson, David BACKGROUNDING - SSA 041000 POLICE DEPT. G PROF SERVICES < *> $35.00* COUNCIL CHECK h _STER 12- APR -2000 (13. page 19 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 209627 04/18/00 $50.00 NORMANDALE COMMUNITY COL CONT-.. "ED. 016 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $50.00* 209628 04/18/00 $100.00 NORTH MEMORIAL HEALTH CA- CONFERENCE FEE LHSO44 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $100.00* 209629 04/18/00 $39.44 NORTH STAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 31009012 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS-MIX 04/18/00 $140.00 NORTH STAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 12009209 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 04/18/00 $40.80 NORTH STAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 36009412 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX < *> $220.24* 209630 04/18/00 $137.20 NORTH STAR TURF SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 221646 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 6554 < *> $137.20* 209631 04/18/00 $655.20 -NORTHERN SAFETY CO INC LOCKOUT KITS 797795 -0 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 3806 < *> $655.20* 209632 04/18/00 $202.34 NORTHERN TOOL & EQUIPMEN TOOL BOX 3287084 BUILDING MAINT TOOLS 5943 < *> $202.34* 209633 04/18/00 $168.34 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY COST OF GOODS SOLD 17250600 ART SUPPLY GIF COST OF GD SOL 9198 04/18/00 $195.00 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY COST OF GOODS SOLD 17270900 ART.SUPPLY GIF COST OF GD SOL 9004 < *> $363.34* 209634 04/18/00 $105.08 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES NW -61851 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES 5824 04/18/00 $972.78 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES,_MOUNT NW -61891 EQUIPMENT_OPER TIRES & TUBES 5644 04/18/00 $232.51 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES, SCRAP FEES NW -61937 EQUIPMENT-OPER TIRES & TUBES 5644 < *> $1,310.37* 209635 04/18/00 $183.84 NOVAK'S GARAGE REPAIRS TO CUSHMAN 13920 CENTENNIAL LAK CONTR REPAIRS 2047 04/18/00 $50.28 NOVAK'S GARAGE REPAIRS TO LIGHT FIXT 15081 CENTENNIAL LAK CONTR REPAIRS 2047 < *> $234.12* 209642 04/18/00 $32,426.45 NSP LIGHT& POWER 012400 ST LIGHTING RE LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 $39.95 NSP LIGHT & POWER 012400 ST LIGHTING OR LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 $4,659.20 NSP LIGHT & POWER 012400, TRAFFIC SIGNAL LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 $4,061.95 NSP LIGHT & POWER 012400 PARKING RAMP LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 $761.70 NSP LIGHT & POWER 012400 FIRE DEPT. GEN LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 $116.59 NSP LIGHT & POWER 012400 YORK FIRE STAT LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 $52.76 NSP LIGHT & POWER 012400 CIVIL DEFENSE LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 $1,859.45 NSP LIGHT & POWER 012400 CITY HALL GENE LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 $3,674.66 NSP LIGHT & POWER 012400 PW BUILDING - LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 $6,945.29 NSP LIGHT & POWER 012400 BUILDING MAINT LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 $3,253.47 NSP LIGHT & POWER 012400 CLUB HOUSE LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 $263.42 NSP LIGHT & POWER 012400 MAINT OF COURS LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 $283.01 NSP LIGHT & POWER 012400 FRED RICHARDS LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 $1,236.96 NSP LIGHT & POWER 012400 GOLF DOME LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 $376.99 NSP LIGHT & POWER 012400 POOL OPERATION LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 $13,292.67 NSP LIGHT & POWER 012400 ARENA BLDG /GRO LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 $1,880.75 NSP LIGHT & POWER 012400 CENTENNIAL LAK LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 $2,731.02 NSP LIGHT & POWER 012400 PUMP & LIFT ST LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 $17,589.54 NSP LIGHT & POWER 012400 DISTRIBUTION LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 $54.51 NSP LIGHT & POWER 012400 TANKS TOWERS & LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 $747.42 NSP LIGHT & POWER 012400 50TH ST OCCUPA LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 $1,- 331.74 NSP LIGHT & POWER 012400 YORK OCCUPANCY LIGHT & POWER 7OUNCIL CHECK REGISTER :HECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 209642 04/18/00 $670.24 NSP LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 $134.23 NSP LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 $216.00 NSP LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 $207.45 NSP LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 - $32,426.45 NSP LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 - $39.95 NSP LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 - $4,659.20 NSP LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 - $4,061.95 NSP LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 - $761.70 NSP LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 - $116.59 NSP LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 - $52.76 NSP LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 - $1,859.45 NSP LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 - $3,674.66 NSP LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 - $6,945.29 NSP LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 - $3,253.47 NSP LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 - $263.42 NSP LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 - $283.01 NSP LIGHT & POWER 04/16/00 - $1,236.96 NSP LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 - $376.99 NSP LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 - $13,292.67 NSP LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 - $1,880.75 NSP LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 - $2,731.02 NSP LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 - $17,589.54 NSP LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 - $54.51 NSP LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 - $747.42 NSP LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 - $1,331.74 NSP LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 - $670.24 NSP' LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 - $134.23 NSP LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 - $216.00 NSP LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 - $207.45 NSP LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 $32,876.83 NSP LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 $33.42 NSP LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 $4,138.91 NSP LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 $3,278.56 NSP LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 $586.77 NSP LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 $112.20 NSP LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 $52.76 NSP LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 $1,801.76 NSP LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 $3,345.74 NSP LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 $4,437.63 NSP LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 $3,088.05 NSP LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 $235.10 NSP LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 $198.30 NSP LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 $355.62 NSP LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 $19,139.98 NSP LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 $799.62 NSP LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 $7,015.14 NSP LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 $1,310.73- NSP LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 $2,529.22 NSP LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 $13,533.96 NSP LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 $44.87 NSP LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 $776.59 NSP LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 $1,175.50 NSP LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 $664.91 NSP LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 $303.59 NSP LIGHT & POWER 12- APR -2000 (13:56) page 20 INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 012400 VERNON OCCUPAN LIGHT & POWER 012400 GENERAL STORM LIGHT & POWER 012400 PONDS & LAKES LIGHT & POWER 012400 AQUATIC WEEDS LIGHT & POWER JAN. 24 ST LIGHTING RE LIGHT & POWER JAN. 24 ST LIGHTING OR LIGHT & POWER JAN. 24 TRAFFIC SIGNAL LIGHT & POWER JAN. 24 PARKING RAMP LIGHT & POWER JAN. 24 FIRE DEPT. GEN LIGHT & POWER JAN. 24 YORK FIRE STAT LIGHT & POWER JAN. 24 CIVIL DEFENSE LIGHT & POWER JAN. 24 CITY HALL GENE LIGHT & POWER JAN. 24 PW BUILDING LIGHT & POWER JAN. 24 BUILDING MAINT LIGHT & POWER JAN. 24 CLUB HOUSE LIGHT & POWER JAN. 24 MAINT OF LOURS LIGHT & POWER JAN. 24 FRED RICHARDS LIGHT & POWER JAN. 24 GOLF DOME LIGHT & POWER JAN. 24 POOL OPERATION LIGHT & POWER JAN. 24 ARENA BLDG /GRO LIGHT & POWER JAN. 24 CENTENNIAL LAK LIGHT & POWER JAN. 24 PUMP & LIFT ST LIGHT & POWER JAN. 24 DISTRIBUTION LIGHT & POWER JAN. 24 TANKS TOWERS & LIGHT & POWER JAN. 24 50TH ST OCCUPA LIGHT & POWER JAN. 24 YORK OCCUPANCY LIGHT & POWER JAN. 24 VERNON OCCUPAN LIGHT & POWER JAN. 24 GENERAL STORM LIGHT & POWER JAN. 24 PONDS & LAKES LIGHT & POWER JAN. 24 AQUATIC WEEDS LIGHT & POWER 042000 ST LIGHTING RE LIGHT & POWER 042000 ST LIGHTING OR LIGHT & POWER 042000 TRAFFIC SIGNAL LIGHT & POWER 042000 PARKING RAMP LIGHT & POWER 042000 FIRE DEPT. GEN LIGHT & POWER 042000 YORK FIRE STAT LIGHT & POWER 042000 CIVIL DEFENSE LIGHT -& POWER 042000 CITY HALL GENE LIGHT & POWER 042000 PW BUILDING LIGHT & POWER 042000 BUILDING MAINT LIGHT & POWER 042000 CLUB HOUSE LIGHT & POWER 042000 MAINT OF LOURS LIGHT & POWER 042000 FRED RICHARDS LIGHT & POWER 042000 POOL OPERATION LIGHT & POWER 042000 ARENA BLDG /GRO LIGHT & POWER 042000 ART CENTER BLD LIGHT & POWER 042000 POOL TRACK GRE LIGHT & POWER 042000 CENTENNIAL LAK LIGHT & POWER 042000 PUMP & LIFT ST LIGHT & POWER 042000 DISTRIBUTION LIGHT & POWER 042000 TANKS TOWERS & LIGHT & POWER 042000 50TH ST OCCUPA LIGHT & POWER 042000 YORK OCCUPANCY LIGHT & POWER 042000 VERNON OCCUPAN LIGHT & POWER 042000 GENERAL STORM LIGHT & POWER COUNCIL CHECK R__iSTER 12- APR -2000 (13. page 21 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT " ` VENDOR..: DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 209642 04/18/00 $175.47 NSP LIGHT & POWER 042000 PONDS & LAKES LIGHT & POWER 04/18/00 $93.16 NSP PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 042000 -2000 AQUATIC.W PROF SERVICES < *> $102,104.39* 209643 04/18/00 209644 04/18/00 209645 04/18/00 209646 04/18/00 209647 04/18/00 209648 04/18/00 04/18/00 209649 04/18/00 209652 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00' 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 04/18/00 $97.98 OLSEN CHAIN & CABLE CO I ROPE FOR COMPLEX 7335 FIELD MAINTENA GENERAL SUPPLI 5733 $97.98* $66.81 OLYMPIC POOLS SELENOID VALVE 14983 CENTENNIAL LAK REPAIR PARTS 2046 $66.81* $284.16 OWENS SERVICES CORP. BOILER SYSTEM REPAIR 39227 POOL TRACK GRE CONTR REPAIRS 2218 $284.16* $576.48 PAPER DEPOT PAPER, CRAFT SUPPLIES 032900 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES 9002 $576.48* - $2,593.11 PARTS.PLUS PARTS 032600 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS $2,593.11* $163.25 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 43725039 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX $118.32 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 43807221 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX $281.57* $244.18 PERSO, ROSELLA AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 040500 GENERAL FD PRO AMBULANCE FEES $244.18* - $118.19 - $119.66 - $17:07 -$2.06 . - $63.69 -$6.15 -$6.14 -$5.99 -$5.99 - $47.44 -$5.99 -$4.13 -$8.48 -$1.46 -$4.92 $34.89 $43.69 $570.89 $945.81 $181.13 $36.78 $76.14 $567.98 $2,227.13 $2.76 $350.45 $503.56 $485.55 $93.00 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE.& SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE-& SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 3211655 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 3211656 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 3211657 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 3211658 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 3211659 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 3211884 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 3211885 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 3211886 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 3211887 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 3211888 .COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 3211889 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 3211890 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 3211891 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 3211954 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 3212109 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 593400 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 593402 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 593403 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 593404 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 593405 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 593406 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 593407 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 593409 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 593410 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 593411 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 593412 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 593413 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 593638 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 593639 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE YORK.SELLING CST OF GD WINE YORK.SELLING CST OF GD LIQU YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING_ CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE VERNON SELLING CST_OF.GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF'GD LIQU YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE �OUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 04/18/00 $643.08 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI GDS 12- APR -2000 (13:56) page 22 HECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNTVENDORDESCRIPTION COST OF GOODS - - - - -- MI CST INVOICE r PROGRAM PINNACLE OBJECTPO NUM 209652 04/18/00 - ------ $667.14 - - - - -- PHILLIPS WINE --------- & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 595509 VERNON - NON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/18/00 $152.28 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 595510 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 04/18/00 $2,271.20 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 595511 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 04/18/00 $856.62 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 595512 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 04/18/00 $4,027.89 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 595513 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/18/00 $588.72 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 595514 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 04/18/00 $2,934.45 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 595515 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $17,200.70* SOLD WI 1 04/18/00 $260.40 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI '1 04/18/00 $1,114.26 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1 209653 04/18/00 $643.08 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI GDS 04/18/00 $438.40 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI CST 04/18/00 $223.68 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI !9289 04/18/00 $287.58 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI GDS 04/18/00 $559.20 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI. 04/18/00 04/18/00 $419.40 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 04/18/00 $597.93 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI $68.50 04/18/00 $699.00 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI < *> $3,868.27* 209658 04/18/00 $160.00 209654 04/18/00 $282.07 PIRTEK PLYMOUTH REPAIR PARTS 04/18/00 $123.24 PIRTEK PLYMOUTH REPAIR HYDRAULIC LEAK < *> 1 $405.31* $8,308.49* 209660 !7622 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX !9093 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX !9099 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX !9144 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX !9166 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX !9289 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX !9307 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX !9332 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 209655 04/18/00 $28.95 POLO RALPH LAUREN CORPOR MERCHANDISE 8 95300 04/18/00 $99.19 POLO RALPH LAUREN CORPOR MERCHANDISE 8 < *> CST $128.14* GD WINE 95306 50TH ST SELLIN 209656 04/18/00 $36.49 POLO RALPH LAUREN WW GOL MERCHANDISE 0 OF 04/18/00 $99.06 POLO RALPH LAUREN WW GOL CLOTHING 0 GD 04/18/00 $153.94 POLO RALPH LAUREN WW GOL MERCHANDISE 0 WINE 04/18/00 $34.46 POLO RALPH LAUREN WW GOL MERCHANDISE 0 04/18/00 $146.66 POLO RALPH LAUREN WW COL MERCHANDISE 6 < *> $470.61* 209657 04/18/00 $271.89 POPP TELCOM MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 3 04/18/00 $68.50 POPP TELCOM REPAIR PHONE 3 04/18/00 $42.28 POPP TELCOM PHONE HANDSET 3 < *> $382.67* 209658 04/18/00 $160.00 PORTHAN, TODD REIMBURSEMENT FOR WOR 0 < *> $160.00* 209659 04/18/00 $8,308.49 PRECISION TURF & CHEMICA CAPITAL EQUIP. 1 < *> $8,308.49* 209660 04/18/00 $694.38 PRINT SHOP, THE MONTHLY NEWSLETTER 1 < *> $694.38* 209661 04/18/00 $965.66 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 11 04/18/00 $72.10 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI Q 04/18/00 $686.97 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1 04/18/00 $260.40 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI '1 04/18/00 $1,114.26 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1 04/18/00 $356.70 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1 04/18/00 $307.40 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI :1 8456 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 6561 8457 ARENA ICE MAIN CONTR REPAIRS 8082 12418 PRO SHOP 13275 PRO SHOP i3 -0500 PRO SHOP ?3 -0500 PRO SHOP 73 -0501 PRO SHOP ?3 -0501 PRO SHOP i3 -0501 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6202 COST OF GDS -PR 6202 COST OF GDS -PR 6201 COST OF GDS -PR 6201 COST OF GDS -PR 6201 COST OF GDS -PR 6201 COST OF GDS -PR 6201 3266 YORK OCCUPANCY TELEPHONE 7977 ARENA BLDG /GRO CONTR REPAIRS 8061 3152 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 3801 32900 FIRE DEPT. GEN UNIF ALLOW 5371 GOLF PROG MACH. & EQUIP 6385 0640 SENIOR CITIZEN GENERAL SUPPLI 4681 95300 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 95304 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 95306 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 95311 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 95313 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 97414 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 98621 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE COUNCIL CHECK h STER 12- APR -2000 (13. page 23 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 209661 04/18/00 $988.15 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 198625 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/18/00 $202.30 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 198628 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 04/18/00 $605.11 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 198631 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 04/18/00 $360.50 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 198633 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/18/00 $1,070.32 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 198636 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $6,989.87* 209662 04/18/00 $670.00 PROGRESSIVE CONSULTING E WATER TREATMENT PL #4 00017.01 GENERAL(BILLIN PROF SERVICES 04/18/00 $3,625.60 PROGRESSIVE CONSULTING E WATER TREATMENT PLANT 99022.11 UTILITY PROG CIP < *> $4,295.60* 209663 04/18/00 $111.00 PROTECTION ONE ALARM SERVICE 040100 ARENA BLDG /GRO ALARM SERVICE 8083 < *> $111.00* 209664 04/18/00 $174.19 QUALITY SPORTS INC MERCHANDISE 129049 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6308 < *> $174.19* 209665 04/18/00 $820.00 R.I. MUSIC PERFORMANCE T TRUST FUND PERFORMANC 032100 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER CONTRACT < *> $820.00* 209666 04/18/00 $63.89 RADIO SHACK CAMERA SUPPLIES 054258 GOLF DOME GENERAL SUPPLI 6496 < *> $63.89* 209667 04/18/00 $287.05 RDO TRUCK CENTER BRACKETS, BUSHINGS 22008000 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5805 < *> $287.05* 209668 04/18/00 $99.00 RECYCOOL ANTIFREEZE RECYCLING 3003146 SUPERV. & OVRH HAZ. WASTE DIS 5957 < *> $99.00* 209669 04/16/00 $22.43 RED ROOSTER AUTO STORES REPAIR PARTS B620820 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 6500 04/18/00 $4.46 RED ROOSTER AUTO STORES SUPPLIES A100979 MAINT OF LOURS GENERAL SUPPLI 6532 04/18/00 $61.64 RED ROOSTER AUTO STORES REPAIR PARTS B632802 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 6532 < *> $88.53* 209671 04/18/00 $1,195.04 RELIANT ENERGY - MINNEGA HEAT 032900 FIRE DEPT. GEN HEAT 04/18/00 $208.30 RELIANT ENERGY - MINNEGA HEAT 032900 YORK FIRE STAT HEAT 04/18/00 $673.95 RELIANT ENERGY - MINNEGA HEAT 032900 CITY HALL GENE HEAT 04/18/00 $4,937.50 RELIANT ENERGY - MINNEGA HEAT 032900 PW BUILDING HEAT 04/18/00 $2,728.08 RELIANT ENERGY - MINNEGA HEAT 032900 BUILDING MAINT HEAT 04/18/00 $509.36 RELIANT ENERGY - MINNEGA HEAT 032900 ART CENTER BLD HEAT 04/18/00 $37.28 RELIANT ENERGY - MINNEGA HEAT 032900 POOL OPERATION HEAT 04/18/00 $711.49 RELIANT ENERGY - MINNEGA HEAT 032900 CLUB HOUSE HEAT 04/18/00 $242.50 RELIANT ENERGY - MINNEGA HEAT .032900 MAINT OF COURS HEAT 04/18/00 $3,916.54 RELIANT ENERGY - MINNEGA HEAT 032900 GOLF DOME ' HEAT 04/18/00 $31.79 RELIANT ENERGY - MINNEGA HEAT 032900 FRED RICHARDS HEAT 04/18/00 $4,869.82 RELIANT ENERGY - MINNEGA HEAT 032900 ARENA BLDG /GRO HEAT 04/18/00 $2,127.55 RELIANT ENERGY - MINNEGA HEAT 032900 POOL TRACK GRE HEAT 04/18/00 $816.91 RELIANT ENERGY - MINNEGA HEAT 032900 CENTENNIAL LAX HEAT 04/18/00 $603.48 RELIANT ENERGY - MINNEGA HEAT 032900 PUMP & LIFT ST HEAT 04/18/00 $2,440.98 RELIANT ENERGY - MINNEGA HEAT 032900 DISTRIBUTION HEAT 04/18/00 $41.01 RELIANT ENERGY - MINNEGA HEAT 032900 50TH ST OCCUPA HEAT 04/18/00 $62.57 RELIANT ENERGY - MINNEGA HEAT 032900 YORK OCCUPANCY HEAT 04/18/00 $141.67 RELIANT ENERGY - MINNEGA HEAT 032900 VERNON OCCUPAN HEAT < *> $26,295.82* =NCIL CHECK REGISTER 12- APR -2000 (13:56) page 24 :HECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 209672 04/18/00 $44.00 RISK MANAGEMENT ALTERNAT MARCH LETTERS 55187701 GENERAL FD PRO AMBULANCE FEES < *> $44.00* 209673 04/18/00 $14.57 RITZ CAMERA CENTERS PHOTO FINISHING 37506495 FIRE DEPT. GEN PHOTO SUPPLIES 3710 < *> $14.57* 209674 04/18/00 $74.00 ROSE, SARAH TENNIS LESSON REFUND 033100 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F < *> $74.00* 209675 04/18/00 $265.00 ROTARY CLUB OF EDINA DUES 123 ADMINISTRATION DUES & SUBSCRI < *> $265.00* 209676 04/18/00 $104.53 SA -AG INC CONCRETE SAND 6880 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLI 1763 < *> $104.53* 209677 04/18/00 $60.82 SAINT AGNES BAKING COMPA BAKERY 042989 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6349 < *> $60.82* 209678 04/18/00 $311.80 SAMARITAN TIRE - WHOLESALE TIRES 011979 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES 5991 < *> $311.80* 209679 04/18/00 $6.25 SCHMITZ, THOMAS RUN FOR REVIEW COFFEE 033000 FIRE DEPT. GEN MEETING EXPENS 04/18/00 $90.00 SCHMITZ, THOMAS NATIONAL REGISTRY -PAR 033000 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $96.25* 209680 04/18/00 $35.00 SCHNEIDER, SARA SKATING LESSON REFUND 033000 EDINB /CL PROG LESSON PRGM IN < *> $35.00* 209681 04/18/00 $425.99 SEARS TOOL BOX 01112409 BUILDING MAINT TOOLS 5738 < *> $425.99* 209682 04/18/00 $676.38 SECURITY LINK FROM AMERI ALARM SERVICE 40213187 CLUB HOUSE ALARM SERVICE 6494 04/18/00 $179.69 SECURITY LINK FROM AMERI ALARM SERVICE 40213249 ART CENTER BLD ALARM SERVICE < *> $856.07* 209683 04/18/00 $30.35 SEELYE PLASTICS TUBING 558104 WATER TREATMEN GENERAL SUPPLI 5953 < *> $30.35* 209684 04/18/00 $248.64 SEH SEWER MONITORING 0062584 SEWER TREATMEN PROF SERVICES 1002 < *> $248.64* 209685 04/18/00 $2,867.58 SGN ARCHITECT FEES 1616 PKBOND CIP PROF SERVICES CONTRACT < *> $2,867.58* 209686 04/18/00 $177.13 SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINT, FIBERGLASS PAN 5983 -1 LIFT STATION M PAINT 5797 04/18/00 $37.70 SHERWIN WILLIAMS SUPPLIES 6267 -8 MAINT OF LOURS GENERAL SUPPLI 6556 < *> $214.83* 209687 04/18/00 $33.00 SHIRLEY, TOM CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 041000 ED ADMINISTRAT CONF & SCHOOLS 04/18/00 $113.37 SHIRLEY, TOM GENERAL SUPPLIES 041000 ED ADMINISTRAT GENERAL SUPPLI 04/18/00 $45.29 SHIRLEY, TOM COST OF GOODS SOLD 041000 CENTENNIAL LAK COST OF GD SOL < *> $191.66* 209688 04/18/00 $245.00 SHORT, MICHAEL CONT. ED. (2000 HUG C 041000 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $245.00* COUNCIL CHECK R 3TER 12- APR -2000 (13, page 25 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 209689 04/18/00 $35.00 SIITARI, MICHAEL CONT. ED. 033100 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS 04/18/00 $39.00 SIITARI, MICHAEL METTING EXPENSE 041000 POLICE DEPT. G MEETING EXPENS < *> $74.00* 209690 04/18/00 $100.00 SINGSATION PERFORMANCE 4 -27 -00 032700 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $100.00* 209692 04/18/00 $824.10 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 105071 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 04/18/00 $45.40 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 105072 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 04/18/00 $992.80 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 105277 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 04/18/00 $12.20 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 105278 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX_. 04/18/00 $2,668.95 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 105281 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 04/18/00 $147.00 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 105282 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 04/18/00 $205.00 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I BEER 105381 FRED RICHARDS CST OF GDS BEE 6342 04/18/00 $266.00 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 407850 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 04/18/00 $57.00 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 105505 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 04/18/00 $1,336.55 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 105506 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 04/18/00 $12.20 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 105507 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 04/18/00 $21.00 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 105509 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 04/18/00 $3,655.50 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 105511 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE < *> $10,243.70* 209693 04/18/00 $1,787.41 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CABLE CATV LEGAL FEES 040100 COMMUNICATIONS PRO SVC OTHER < *> $1,787.41* 209694 04/18/00 $595.40 SPALDING GOLF BALLS 52229827 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6217 04/18/00 $294.00 SPALDING GOLF BALLS 52229837 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6217 04/18/00 $441.00 SPALDING GOLF BALLS 52427246 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6217 04/18/00 $1,785.60 SPALDING GOLF BALLS 52233568 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6217 < *> $3,116.00* 209695 04/18/00 $378.10 SPECIALTY DOOR SYSTEMS I REPAIR CONCESSION FEN 3684 ARENA BLDG /GRO CONTR REPAIRS 8084 < *> $378.10* 209696 04/18/00 $92.80 SPORT - HALEY INC. MERCHANDISE 202887 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6200 04/18/00 $60.76 SPORT - HALEY INC. MERCHANDISE 202940 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6200 < *> $153.56* 209697 04/18/00 $165.12 ST. ANDREWS PRODUCTS CO BAG TAGS 0222339- PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6223 < *> $165.12* 209698 04/18/00 $3,417.20 STAR TRIBUNE HELP WANTED ADS 033100 CENT SVC GENER ADVERT PERSONL < *> $3,417.20* 209699 04/18/00 $89.48 STREICHERS GENERAL SUPPLIES 148123.2 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI 5265 04/18/00 $54.24 STREICHERS EQUIPMENT MAINT. 157325.1 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP MAINT 3184 04/18/00 $132.59 STREICHERS REPLACE CARBINES 157370.1 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP REPLACEM 3165 04/18/00 $37.22 STREICHERS UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 157656.1 POLICE DEPT. G UNIF ALLOW < *> $313.53* 209700 04/18/00 $2,252.04 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET BODY REPAIR CVCB3673 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 5810 04/18/00 $35.65 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET PLATE 110014CV EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5992 04/18/00 $133.48 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REARVIEW MIRROR 110015CV EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5993 04/18/00 $6.52 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET HANDLE 110248CV EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5969 < *> $2,427.69* '_OUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 12- APR -2000 (13:56) page 26 =HECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 209701 04/18/00 $1,482.00 SUN MOUNTAIN SPORTS INC. MERCHANDISE 549311 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6203 < *> $1,482.00* 209702 04/18/00 $125.00. SUN NEWSPAPERS WEBSITE ADVERTISING 303825 COMMUNICATIONS CONTR SERVICES 04/18/00 $266.25 .SUN NEWSPAPERS ADVERTISING 308080 COMMUNICATIONS CONTR SERVICES < *> $391.25* - 209703 04/18/00 $2,899.88 SUN NEWSPAPERS WANT AD 033100 CENT SVC GENER ADVERT PERSONL < *> $2,899.88* • 209704 04/18/00 $4,171.66 SUNDE LAND SURVEYING INC EASEMENT PREPARATION 25469 W 77TH ST PENT CIP < *> $4,171.66* 209705 04/18/00 $676.34 SUNDERLAND OF SCOTLAND MERCHANDISE 259713 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6222 < *> $676.34* 209706 04/18/00 $521.26 SUPERIOR COFFEE AND FOOD COFFEE. 8145204 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6343 < *> $521.26* 209707 04/18/00 $48.00 SWOFFORD, JILL REFUND - FAB 4 & 5 033000 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F < *> $48.00* 209708 04/18/00 $66.03 TAPE COMPANY, THE GENERAL SUPPLIES 47853091 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI 3178 < *> $66.03* 209709 04/18/00 $45.43 TARGET FRAMES, ASPIRIN 82019 GRILL GENERAL SUPPLI 6475 04/18/00 $69.94 TARGET FILM 84500 CENT SVC GENER ADVERT PERSONL < *> $115.37* 209710 04/18/00 $141.22 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO WIRE,. SHRINK TERMINAL 24553 -00 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 5934 04/18/00 $23.07 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO POWER-CONNECTOR 24740 -00 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 5934 < *> $164.29* 209711 04/18/00 $40 -00 THOLEN, BRIAN CONT. ED. (H &K ARMORE 041000 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $40.00* 209712 04/18/00 $15,440.81 THOMSEN & NYBECK PROSECUTING 143096 LEGAL SERVICES PROF SERVICES < *> $15,440.81* 209713 04/18/00 $5,128.35 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 188902 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 04/18/00 $175.05 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP COST OF.GOODS SOLD MI 188903 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 04/18/00 $324.00 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP BEER 189462 GRILL CST OF GDS BEE 6345 04/18/00 $2,071.25 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 189586 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 04/18/00 $24.20 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 189587 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $7,722.85* 209714 04/18/00 $798.24 TITLEIST MERCHANDISE 2848461 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6210 04/18/00 $1,349.06 TITLEIST GLOVES 2852906 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6210 04/18/00 $539.95 TITLEIST HATS 2852907 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6210 04/18/00 $747.42 TITLEIST CLUBS 2854896 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6210 04/18/00 $71.60 TITLEIST WEDGE 2857952 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6210 04/18/00 $142.21 TITLEIST MERCHANDISE 2868825 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6210 < *> $3,648.48* 209715 04/18/00 $292.50 TODD, DARRELL UNIFORM ACCESSORIES R 040700 FIRE DEPT. GEN UNIF ALLOW COUNCIL CHECK i. ASTER 12- APR -2000 (13. page 27 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <*> $292.50* 209716 04/18/00 $23.29 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPL WELDING SUPPLIES 3/31 STM CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $23.29* 209717 04/18/00 $182.31 TOMMY HILFIGER GOLF MERCHANDISE 533706 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6205 04/18/00 $475.73 TOMMY HILFIGER GOLF MERCHANDISE 533707 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6205 04/18/00 $96.97 TOMMY HILFIGER GOLF MERCHANDISE 533904 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6205 < *> $755.01* 209718 04/18/00 $1,195.13 TURF PARTNERS COURSE SUPPLIES 69908SI MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPLI 6505 < *> $1,195.13* 209719 04/18/00 $108.09 TURF SUPPLY COMPANY COURSE SUPPLIES 074136 MAINT OF LOURS GENERAL SUPPLI 6553 < *> $108.09* 209720 04/18/00 $985.13 TURTLE BAY BUILDING SERV MONTHLY CLEANING SERV 192 POOL TRACK GRE PROF SERVICES < *> $985.13* 209721 04/18/00 $20.43 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO GENERAL SUPPLIES 534939 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $20.43* 209722 04/18/00 $372.75 TWIN CITY SEED CO. SEED 2403 MAINT OF COURS PLANT & TREES 6555 < *> $372.75* 209723 04/18/00 $61.36 U S BANCORP MEETING EXPENSES 040500 ADMINISTRATION MEETING EXPENS < *> $61.36* 209724 04/18/00 $100.00 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TREE SCHOOL A0005463 TREES & MAINTE CONF & SCHOOLS 5751 04/18/00 $100.00 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TREE SCHOOL A0005464 TREES & MAINTE CONF & SCHOOLS 5751 04/18/00 $100.00 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TREE SCHOOL A0005465 TREES & MAINTE CONF & SCHOOLS 5751 < *> $300.00* 209725 04/18/00 $200.00 US BANK PAYING AGENT CTS00355 GOLF ADMINISTR PROF SERVICES < *> $200.00* 209726 04/18/00 $289.15 VAN PAPER CO. BAGS 310572 50TH ST SELLIN PAPER SUPPLIES 7511 04/18/00 $569.24 VAN PAPER CO. TT, TOWELS, CUPS & PL 310577 CITY HALL GENE PAPER SUPPLIES 4697 04/18/00 $444.58 VAN PAPER CO. BAGS 310578 VERNON SELLING PAPER SUPPLIES 7513 04/18/00 $570.79 VAN PAPER CO. BAGS 310779 YORK SELLING PAPER SUPPLIES 7512 < *> $1,873.76* 209727 04/18/00 $135.00 VIETNAM VETERANS ORGANIZ AD IN VETERANS BOOK 032800 YORK SELLING ADVERT OTHER < *> $135.00* 209728 04/18/00 - $312.00 VINENET INTERNATIONAL IN COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 485 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/18/00 $1,360.00 VINENET INTERNATIONAL IN COST OF GOODS SOLD WI.518 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE < *> $1,048.00* 209729 04/18/00 $54.32 VOSS LIGHTING FLUORESCENT BULBS 2062773- PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 5938 < *> $54.32* 209730 04/18/00 $201.50 WALSER FORD BRAKE SHOES 81885FOW EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5818 04/18/00 $57.00 WALSER FORD BRAKE SHOE KIT 82002FOW EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5959 04/18/00 $3.16 WALSER FORD DOOR LOCK 82018POW EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5962 :OUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 12- APR -2000 (13:56) page 28 :HECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 209730 04/18/00 $51.07 WALSER FORD HEATER ASSEMBLY 82020FOW EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5963 04/18/00 $16.17 WALSER FORD HEATER HOSES 82035FOW EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5964 < *> $328.90* 209731 04/18/00 $715.95 WALT DISNEY WORLD HUG CONF. 2000 - M. S 041000 POLICE DEPT: G CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $715.95* 209732 04/18/00 $859.14 WALT DISNEY WORLD HUG CONF. 2000 -J. WA 04/10 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $859.14* 209733 04/18/00 $280.00 WATERSTREET, JOAN M 2000 HUG CONF. PER DI 041000 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $280.00* 209734 04/18/00 $133.66 WELSH COMPANIES INC ADJUSTMENT TO BILL 997472 YORK OCCUPANCY PROF SERVICES < *> $133.66* 209735 04/18/00 $267.73 WEST PHOTO GENERAL SUPPLIES 92205 MEDIA LAB GENERAL SUPPLI 9170 < *> $267.73* 209736 04/18/00 $497.16 WEST'WELD SUPPLY CO. ELECTRODES, DRILL BIT 30401 EQUIPMENT OPER WELDING SUPPLI 5937 < *> $497.16* 209737 04/18/00 $527.65 WIESNER, TONI CONTINUING EDUCATION 033100 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $527.65* 209738 0.4/18/00 $110.82 WILKINSON, JENNIFER MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 040300 COMMUNICATIONS MILEAGE < *> $110.82* 209739 04/18/00 $32.64 WILLIAMS STEEL & HARDWAR SPRAY PAINT 903895 -0 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 5847 < *> $32.64* 209740 04/18/00 $59.64 WILSON, TERRI MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 033100 GOLF ADMINISTR MILEAGE < *> $59.64* 209741 04/18/00 $70.00 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 037372 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 04/18/00 $252.05 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 037461 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 04/18/00 - $35.00 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 037576 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 04/18/00 $666.65.• WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS.SOLD WI 037712 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/18/00 $1,932.56 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 037713 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/18/00 $56.95 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 037718 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 04/18/00 $1,128.55 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 037719 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE < *> $4,071.76* 209742 04/18/00 - $82.06 WINE MERCHANTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 10096 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/18/00 - $101.66 WINE MERCHANTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 10115 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/18/00 $236.38 WINE MERCHANTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 27610 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF.GD.WINE 04/18/00 $1,576.51 WINE MERCHANTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 27611 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/18/00 $697.33 WINE MERCHANTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 27612 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/18/00 $1,081.90 WINE MERCHANTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 27840 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 04/18/00 $760.15 WINE MERCHANTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 27841 YORK SELLING- CST OF GD WINE 04/18/00 $416.95 WINE MERCHANTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 27842 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $4,585.50* 209743 04/18/00 $92.60 WINSTAR BROADBAND SERVIC GRANT - CDPD 210356 COPS MORE GRAN EQUIP REPLACEM < *> $92.60* 12- APR -2000 (13 page 29 COUNCIL CHECK I- -iSTER CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM ----- - - -- OBJECT-- - - - -PO NUM --------- 209744 ------------------------ 04/18/00 $957.00 WORLD ------------------------------------------------------------ CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 92010 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/18/00 $1,372.60 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 92011 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/18/00 $61.90 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 92237 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/18/00 $280.80 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 92238 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/18/00 $219.00 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 92310 50TH ST SELLINICST OF GD WINE < *> $2,891.30* 209745 04/18/00 $60.00 ZALASKY, JONI SWIMMING LESSON REFUN 033100 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F < *> $60.00* $835,356.38* COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY 12- APR -2000 (14:00) page 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ FUND # 10 GENERAL FUND $285,752.16 FUND # 11 COMMUNITY DEVELP. BLOCK GR $1,000.00 FUND # 12 COMMUNICATIONS $7,209.03 FUND # 15 WORKING CAPITAL $13,359.91 FUND # 23 ART CENTER $6,251.38 FUND # 25 GOLF DOME FUND $4,195.05 FUND # 26 SWIMMING POOL FUND $447.50 FUND # 27 GOLF COURSE FUND $106,610.59 FUND # 28 ICE ARENA FUND $26,561.97 FUND # 30 EDINBOROUGH /CENTENNIAL LAK $23,016.29 FUND # 40 UTILITY FUND $108,722.66 FUND # 41 STORM SEWER UTILITY FUND $668.81 FUND # 42 RECYCLING PROGRAM $37,935.20 FUND # 50 LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND $204,197.25 FUND # 60 CONSTRUCTION FUND $6,561.00 FUND # 61 PARK BOND FUND $2,867.58 $835,356.38* FROM : SINGLE HOUSE FAX NO. : 612 795 9699 Apr. 13 2000 11:22AM P1 CITIZENS COMMITTEE FOR LEGISLATIVE REFORM P.Q. Boa 32106 — Fridley, MN 55432 1- 877 -4 -1 -HOUSE www.singlehouse.com To: Mayor City Council Members City Officials Re: Legislative Alert - Unicameral (Single House) Legislature As you know there has been great debate on reforming Minnesota's legislature into a unicameral or single house system. Between 75 -90% of Minnesotans want the opportunity to vote on the issue in November. The current state legislature must vote to place the unicameral amendment on the general election ballot. As a city official you have an obligation to listen to your constituents on important city matters. Their views and concerns are important as you discuss and decide city business. The same is true at the Minnesota Legislature. However, without more citizen involvement, the legislature may not place the unicameral amendment on the ballot for the people to decide. Worse, they may not even allow a full floor vote of each body on whether this reaches the citizens. You must act today. In the last days of this legislative session your input with your state senator and state representative is crucial for this issue. Remember, 75 -90% of Minnesotans want this on the ballot. Those 75 -90% are your constituents, too. Their views and concerns on state government are important and you must help them. Please call your state senator and state representative today and ask them to place the unicameral amendment on the November ballot. Time is running out. Minnesota House 651- 296 -2146 Minnesota Senate 651- 296 -0504 Thank you for your service to your constituents. �4 L-DTNTA PARK BOARD 7:30 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS MARCH 14, 2000 N4EMBERS PRESENT: Tom White, Dave Fredlund, Chuck Mooty, Floyd Grabiel, Karla Sitek, George KIM, Andy Finsness, Scot Housh, John Murrin, Andy Herring, Linda Presthus STAFF PRESENT: John Keprios, Ed MacHolda, Janet Canton OTHERS PRESENT: Mike Kojetin, Bob Kojetin, Tish Crane, Chris Halden, Paul Meehl, Liz Nordstrom, Mary Peterson, Ralph Peterson, Carl Gulbronson, Duane Nordstrom, Andrew Peterson, K.C. Olson, Tim Hohn, David Olson, Pete Anderson, Adam Arvidson, Del Miller I. ELECTION OF OFFICERS Mr. Keprios opened up the floor for nominations for Park Board Chair. Chuck Mooty NOMINATED ANDY HERRING AS RENEWING HIS POSITION AS PARK BOARD CHAIR. JOHN MURRIN SECONDED. Mr. Herring commented that he would be happy to do it but wanted everyone to be aware that he has been given the opportunity to participate in a management program which will take him out of town for nine weeks. Therefore, he will miss the next two meetings and with his travel schedule he can't promise that he won't miss another meeting. Chuck Mooty MOVED TO CLOSE NOMINATIONS. Dave Fredlund SECONDED. ANDY HERRING WAS VOTED IN AS CHAIR. Mr. Keprios opened up the floor for Park Board Vice - Chair. John Murrin MOVED TO NOMINATE GEORGE KLUS. Andy Herring MOVED TO NOMINATE TOM WHITE. Chuck Mooty MOVED TO CLOSE NOMINATIONS. Andy Herring SECONDED. Paper ballots were handed out and results were counted by staff. TOM WHITE WAS VOTED IN AS VICE - CHAIR. H. CITY /SCHOOL REFERENDUM UPDATE Mr. Keprios explained that at the last meeting with the School Board and City Council there was some very good discussion. The meeting left off where the City would send a memorandum of understanding to the school district regarding the operational expenses, priority access to facilities, construction management and ownership. Decision Resources will be surveying approximately 400 households and they are currently in the middle of that process. There was also discussion of what will and will not be in the referendum as well as looking at the feasibility of building a dome. He noted that is currently being studied by Anderson/Johnson Architects and they should have the results on the facts and figures in a report by early next week. Mr. Keprios indicated that he was asked to attend a meeting with the president of the Edina Swim Club, the Swim Club Coach and Edina School swim coaches. He noted that Tim Moody, President of the Edina Swim Club, made it very clear that they will support this initiative only if an additional pool is added on to Valley View. They indicated that if an additional pool is not built it doesn't gain them any additional pool time. Mr. Moody stated that the Edina Swim Club will not support a plan that simply renovates the existing pools in the middle schools and does not add more available pool time. Mr. Keprios stated that the City Council has also indicated that they will not make a decision on the proposal until hearing the results of the survey by Decision Resources and more information from the School District with regard to the memo of understanding. Depending on the timing of the results of the survey, the vote may have to be delayed until the fall. Mr. Klus asked when the results from the survey will be in. Mr. Keprios responded that they should have the results by the April 4 "' City Council meeting. Mr. Mooty indicated that realistically there is no way a referendum could be put to vote by this May. He noted that currently there are so many moving parts to this that residents don't know yet if they are in favor or not because no one knows exactly what's involved at this time. Mr. Mooty stated that'be feels realistically fall is going to be the earliest that it's going to be able to get done. Ill. APPROVAL OF THE FEBRUARY 9;2000 PARK BOARD MINUTES George Klus MOVED TO APPROVE THE FEBRUARY 9, 2000 PARK BOARD MliINUTES. John Murrirt SECONDED THE MOTION. MINUTES APPROVED. IV. SKATE PARK Mr. Keprios explained that he and Mr. MacHolda met with KC Olson and Andrew Peterson to discuss the possibility of building a skate park. Mr. Keprios indicated that there are no two skate parks that are the same. He noted that the consensus from the two young gentlemen and their parents is their interest right now lies with having a supervised, pay as you go facility. Mr. Keprios stated that there is a lot of leg work that needs to be done once they get further into the process. Mr. Olson informed the Park Board that a skate park would be the answer to a lot of problems. First, whenever they go skateboarding or rollerblading in a public area they 2 always get kicked out such as sidewalks, parking ramps, etc. Secondly, not all kids play sports all year and they need something else to do. Thirdly, the local skate parks are few and far between except for the one in Minneapolis on Lake Street, which is a not real safe area to drop a kid off at. Therefore, Edina needs a skate park. Mr. Olson indicated that there is a skate park company for people who are interested in purchasing ramps, rails, etc. to build a tier 1 skate park as well as a tier 2 skate park. Mr. Murrin commented that he thinks the skate parks look like they could be dangerous and kids could get hurt. Mr. Olson explained that the tier 2 ramps are over three feet and need to have adult supervision whereas the tier 1 ramps are under three feet and there does not need to be supervision. Mr. Murrin indicated that just because someone is supervising doesn't necessarily prevent a kid from making a wrong turn and really hurting themselves. Mr. Peterson stated that there are always going to be accidents in every sport whether it's hockey, baseball, football, etc. Mr. Murrin asked if they feel this is any more dangerous than any of those other sports. Mr. Peterson replied that for sports like football and hockey they wear protective gear which are also worn at the skate parks. Mr. Murrin asked with protective gear does that help to keep high risk injuries to a minimal amount. Mr. Peterson responded that protective gears does help to reduce injuries but you can's always prevent injuries. He also stated that all participants at skate parks have to sign waivers indicating that they know there is serious risk of serious injury and they are taking responsibility for themselves. Mr. Housh asked what kind of a demand is there for a skate park. Mr. Peterson pointed out that they have started a petition and there are a lot of kids interested and the demand is there. Mr. Keprios indicated that they had a wonderful meeting with these two young gentlemen and he really applauds them for being here. He said that these are a couple of great kids. He noted that some of the ideas that he put in his staff report are to fence in the area around the golf dome. At this location there are restrooms available, a telephone and concessions area. Another idea is to fence in an area at the Braemar Arena parking lot. Also, another possibility would be to look into a joint venture with the YMCA. The City of Edina owns Yorktown Park which is right next to the YMCA. Mr. Keprios pointed out that this is an age group that likes high risk activities and not all kids are into team sport activities. Mr. Keprios noted that he likes the idea of having an unsupervised, very low risk skate park made of concrete where kids can show up and use it at their own risk, unsupervised, at any time. He indicated that the kids thought it was a good idea but are concerned that they might get bored with a tier 1 after awhile. However, looking at the plus side there would be very little operating expense and very little insurance premium expense. Mr. Keprios indicated that another idea is to use a tennis court, take down the nets and declare it as a skate park for the summer. They also talked about not putting in ice at Braemar Arena on the third sheet for the summer and just absorb the cost for that operating expense and have that be the supervised indoor area. 3 Mr. Herring asked how big of an area is needed for this and asked if it can be concrete and /or asphalt. Mr. Olson replied that asphalt is okay but when it gets really hot it gets soft and sticky and it's hard to skate on, therefore, if you have the right temperature it's fine but othenvise, no. Mr. Herring commented that he thinks the golf dome is a great idea because it's not used in the summer months and all of the amenities are there to support it, however, the one down side is it's asphalt. Mr. Keprios indicated that there is always the possibility that with adequate funding it could be converted to concrete. Mr. Klus indicated he likes the idea of having a joint venture with the YMCA. He noted that if a skate park is developed it will probably be a tier I and over time kids are going to want a tier 2 skate park. Therefore, if the YMCA worked with us it would be a way to provide supervision as well as have a cost savings. Mr. Herring asked if possibly other cities would be interested in doing this such as Richfield and Bloomington and have it be more of a regional opportunity. Mr. Keprios responded that is something they can definitely look into. Carl Gulbronson, Edina resident, indicated that he has been skateboarding for 36 years and has been roller blading for the last 12 years and he supports these young gentlemen's efforts to develop some aspect of a skate park anywhere in Edina. He stated that areas that are nice for skate boarding and rollerblading are generally in public areas where people don't want them to be, such as the Aquatic Center. Mr. Gulbronson noted that as a parent he would support a plan for developing a tier 1, unsupervised, skate park. He also commented that in his opinion the incidence of serious injury is probably lower than there is with hockey or football. He stated that football has the highest level of injuries in any sport. Mr. Gulbronson pointed out that from an adult perspective there are other people out there like him who may have toned down their rollerblading or skateboarding to circles around Lake Harriet or on city streets. He noted in his opinion traffic in the neighborhoods is getting worse and that tends to be very dangerous as well. Tish Crane, resident, indicated that she has talked to Mr. Keprios about a skate park in the past. She explained how her family would go to Golden Valley where there was a rotating skate park that went to different cities and asked Mr. Keprios how Edina could het one of these. She noted that within the month this skate park was in Golden Valley her family ventured there at least 8 to 10 times. She pointed out that it was supervised by one adult and there Nvere very specific rules, such as you had to sign a waiver, wear all of the pads and a helmet. She indicated that it cost about $4.00 per hour and was always crowded. Ms. Crane commented that the Park Board should really listen to these young gentlemen because there is not a lot for this age group to do unless they are in organized sports during the summer months. She noted that these kids are still going to be skateboarding and rollerblading in most places where people don't want them to be doing that. Mr. Crane stated that in her neighborhood they have built four ramps in which one is 12 feet high and they have never had any injuries. She also noted that the kids always wear protective gear. 4 Mr. Keprios indicated that he remembers when Ms. Crane approached him about the traveling ramp and he did look into it. At that time, however, there was no funding available because they had to have money to up- front to pay the private skate park provider. Mr. Keprios pointed out that the traveling group has since gone out of business because it's very expensive due to insurance premiums and staffing costs. There was not enough profit margin for the private firm to continue. Liz Nordstrom, resident, indicated that she has a 9 year -old and a 5 year -old and they have experienced a skateboard park in another city and her kids were there every moment she would take them. She commented that they also have their own makeshift skateboard ramp in their driveway and would truly like to see the city put one in because when the kids come the driveway, off the ramp, into the street it can be very dangerous. She noted that it's not just the kids who are using these, it's people from age 5 to 45 that would Utilize it. She noted that there is some very strong support for this and she would like to see it happen. Mr. White asked what it happening with the gun range site. Mr. Keprios responded that they are going to wait for one last legislative session to see if the dollars will become available to build a fire /police training facility, so that land may be available. Mr. Grabiel indicated that he likes the idea of a skate park and his first reaction was to put it someplace over by Braemar so that it's out of the way. But he really likes the idea of working with the YMCA, Bloomington and Richfield. Ms. Sitek stated that she agrees, the city lacks activities for the pre -teen to early non - driving teen age group and this would be a very good activity for them. George Klus MOVED THAT THE STAFF LOOK INTO RANKING SOME OF THE OPTIONS FOR A SKATE PARK THAT COULD BE PUT IN THE CITY AND BRING THAT INFORMATION BACK TO THE PARK BOARD WITHIN THE NEXT 60 DAYS. Mr. Keprios indicated that he would like to know a little more as to what the Park Board is looking for such as a tier 1 or tier 2, supervised or unsupervised, or just look at all of the options. Mr. Klus commented that his concern is that a tier 1 would get old quickly. Mr. White commented that they should spend money on what the kids want. Floyd Grabiel SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Herring thanked'everyone who attended the meeting and provided input and noted they will let everyone know when this item will be back on the agenda. Mr. Olson suggested have a small tier l for the younger kids and small tier 2 for the older kids and that way no one would get bored. V'. 1A\N7IS PARK BANDY RINK - AMERICAN BANDY ASSOCIATION Paul Mechl, City of Savage resident, indicated that lie has been in contact with Mr. Keprios and Mr. Mac.Holda for a number of years regarding the bandy rink at Lewis Park. He stated that the bandy group hasn't done the best job of reminding the city that they appreciate all of the work they do each year. He noted that after they use it in February they forget about it until the next fall when they usually have a conversation about two weeks before the season starts ,vhether there will be a bandy rink or not. He noted that they get'all worked up and ask how can you talk about losing the rinks when they haven't done anything about it in the last 8 months and therefore, he apologizes for that and that is what has brought them here tonight. Mr. Meehl stated that they really do appreciate the facility and knows that it's not all Edina residents who use it and that economically he doesn't know all of the details. He pointed out that the bandy program is very unique in that it is the only one of its kind in the whole continent and outside of the Scandinavia countries and Russia. He explained that at its peak there were about 300 to 400 participants in the program. Mr. Meehl stated there is talk about replacing the bandy rink with a high quality soccer facility and that is a great thing too. He noted they have done some research and have looked at different sites for a bandy rink but because there are 300,players spread around 35 different cities, it's pretty tough for any one of them to go to any one town. Mr. Meehl commented that they are clinging to Lewis Park as their home and with all natural ice their program is really in jeopardy. Therefore, they are here to ask the Park Board to look outside their normal frames of vision for city projects. If you look within your nonnal frames of deciding what facilities to keep and what facilities not to.and you look at the residents.use, cost effectiveness, how many weeks of the year are used, bandy would lose. He indicated that they would like the Park Board to look at things like the uniqueness given that the program is one of a kind in the country. Because of Lewis Park hundreds of people have had the opportunity to play international bandy and there are almost 200 kids coming into the program now that are going to have those opportunities as long as the program continues. Mr. Meehl pointed out that without a cost effective place to play with natural ice like Lewis Park, they are in pretty rough shape. He noted that they have to pay around S250.00 an hour for oval bandy rink in Roseville. Mr. Herring asked how much is the oval to which Mr. MacHolda responded they charge 5250.00 including referees whereas Edina charges S 120.00 an hour. Mr. Meehl commented that he hopes there is a way, should the soccer facility be approved and budgeted for, to keep both sports. He indicated that he understands the pressure from the soccer side and that it's not realistic to expect you to set aside this area for 6 to 8 weeks a year in a lieu of a facility that would be used 6 to 10 months a year. He inclic:'ited that lie hopes the surface can be used for both ice and grass. on Bob Kojetin, resident, gave a history of bandy and how he brought the sport to the United States in 1976. He introduced softball to the Soviet Union and they in turn introduced bandy to the United States. He explained that he thought this would be an opportunity to live youngsters more time on the ice. Mr. Kojetin noted that the sport of bandy has grown in the Scandinavian countries and the Soviet Union. Mr. Kojetin indicated that it took a lot of promoting and the bandy program was started in 1980. Mr. Kojetin explained that a lot of people asked him why he promoted the sport because it's expensive and uses a large sheet of ice. He noted that his response to those people was there is a group of people out there who want to do other things and indicated that a lot of people at that time were not using the outdoor rinks. And needed something to bring the kids back to the outdoor ice. Mr. Kojetin indicated that at that time Lewis Park was starting its construction. He pointed out that Lewis Park was always looked at as a soccer facility but at that time kids weren't playing soccer and he literally had to call people to get them out to play soccer. Mr. Kojetin pointed out that soccer was a dead sport for 50 years in this country and it has only exploded in the last 25 years. Mr. Kojetin indicated that he thinks the area can be used for both soccer and bandy and that there is a lot information out there on what could be used for the surface. He explained that almost all of the small communities in Europe use the same area, which is like a grass surface with sand in it, for both soccer and bandy. Mr. Kojetin noted that the staff has looked at some kind of dual surface in the past and realizes that the most parents want their kids to play on grass and not an artificial surface. Mr. Kojetin infon-ned the Park Board that the soil at Lewis Park is very, very poor and there is a sink hole. He indicated that they have put tons and tons of sand in there and it just keeps sinking away. He noted that originally they put irrigation out there but had to eventually take it out because it had settled so much. Mr. Kojetin again stated that he would like to see some type of a dual purpose surfacing out there so that both sports could be played there. Mr. Kojetin pointed out that even though a lot of the participants do not live in Edina they did grow up in Edina and they always come back and want to play in Edina. Chris Halden, Minnetonka resident, indicated that he has been with the bandy program for 18 years. He indicated that there is a lot of culture at Lewis Park with the bandy rink, and if it's ever taken out, it will do some real damage to Edina. Mr. Halden stated that two years ago there was this same discussion and the local neighborhood stepped up and said they wanted to keep the bandy rink. He noted that they have never created any problems and have just gone about their business very quietly and never really asked for much other than a place to play and they are charged $2,000. He noted that they basically run the program themselves. Mr. Halden explained that bandy has done a lot of good things for the community, they've had the soviet national teams here and the world championship here. He stated that they played at the World Cup in Russia last year and it was on national television with 20,000 people at the game. Mr. Halden noted that not everyone in Edina knows about bandy because they haven't really promoted it and that's the Bandy Associations fault. However, they have worked really hard to keep it going 7 f and Edina should be proud of the accomplishments they've had. He stated that it would he real mistake to eliminate it because it's something that's very unique in the United States. Therefore, he feels Edina should continue to support the program. Mile Kojetin, Eagan resident, asked if the Bandy Association could be informed of what the Park Board's.thoughts are in the future as well as be informed of any meetings where this issue,would be brought up. Pete Anderson, President of the Edina Soccer Association, indicated that the Edina Soccer Association (ESA) has over 2,500 participants in their house program, which does not include the traveling program. He informed the Park Board that for the first time they are going to have to deny participation to some children who want to play because they' are constrained in terms of facilities that are available for soccer games. He explained that the Under 6 age group Nvill play at Lewis Park this year, that means 600 to 700 children of Edina residents will be playing each week at Lewis Park. Mr. Anderson indicated that in talking with members of the staff in the past it's impossible to grow grass on that area primarily because of flooding and no irrigation system can be put in there. Lewis Park is an area that is very susceptible to flooding, even an inch of rain will sit on that area for up to a week or more. Therefore, it's not an ideal facility but because soccer facilities are so constrained they have to use it. Mr. Anderson stated'that if the proposed improvements to this facility were made it could be used not only for soccer but also for football, rugby and lacrosse. He indicated that as Mr. Kojetin mentioned soccer in its inception was not a popular sport. However, the difference between the time of soccer starting and the current time with bandy's popularity, Edina is a very well developed community and there is not enough green space available to allow a program that uses the facility for 6 or 8 weeks a year. Mr. Anderson suggested looking at communities south of the river that possibly have more green space -as well as might be a better location for a bandy program. Mr. Anderson stated that ESA is paying approximately 54,000 to use the Lewis Park facility. He indicated that ESA has also contributed over S20,000.00 in the past couple of years to the City of Edina for various field improvements throughout the city. Mr. Anderson explained that they are asking that the Lewis East area be developed as a better quality turf field with real grass and no flooding. He pointed out that the amount of maintenance required to maintain a soccer field versus a bandy rink and the amount of residents versus non - resident's use of Lewis Park, he would ask that it be developed as a soccer facility. l\4r. Klus asked Mr. Keprios where they are at with doing some work at Lewis Park. Mr. Keprios replied that last year they decided to keep bandy because there wasn't money available to do the things that Park Board wanted to see done at Lewis Park. He noted that it is still a question mark if we are going to get money through a capital plan, however, it looks much more optimistic this year than it did last year. Mr. Klus asked are we still a year away from being able to do any upgrades to Lewis Park if it was deemed necessary. Mr. Keprios responded that it's possible funding could be available this calendar year. He noted that the previous direction from the Park Board was as soon as 8 funding is available he is to start to develop that into a soccer field and stated that is the track he has been on. Ms. Sitek asked if they can co- exist, flood the sheet of ice and have grass. Mr. Keprios indicated that previously they looked into the possibility of flooding over astro turf and the professional in the field said no. Mr. Keprios noted that there are places in Sweden that do it but it's more of a combination of grass and gravel. He stated that maybe it could be possible but it is not something that ESA would want. Mr. Housh asked the bandy people if they expect to continue to have players who are going to want to use this rink. It was noted that right now they have the largest youth program they have ever had with almost 200 kids, which is almost as large as the adult program. Once they are done with the youth program they will need a place to play because right now they are in a small area. Mr. Meehl noted that they cannot compete with soccer by saying they have over 2,000 players who are Edina residents. They are saying there is one natural ice rink in North America and it's here in Edina. Mr. Herring asked how many Edina residents are in the bandy youth program to which Mr. Meehl replied only a handful. Ms. Presthus asked how many Edina residents are in the adult program to which it was noted approximately 15 to 20. There are 200 participants in the program and they are spread throughout the state. However, at least half of them either grew up in Edina or have lived in Edina at one point in time. Mr. Halden stated that when this issue came before the Park Board about 5 years ago the neighborhood clearly liked having the big sheet of ice in the winter. He noted that he doesn't think the neighborhood would want a soccer complex. Mr. Halden commented that a decision based on only money shouldn't always be the correct decision, there are other things involved. Mr. Herring indicated that he is speaking for himself and a number of the members on the Park Board that they do want to look very seriously at converting Lewis Park into a soccer facility. However, it's a mute point right now because we don't have the funding to do the renovations necessary to convert it. He noted that he would suggest that long- term it's probably going to be a soccer facility and therefore bandy may want to think about where the program is going so you are on notice that he thinks this is where we are headed. He stated that right now it's year to year because we cannot make a change but long -terns it probably will be a soccer facility. He noted that it is driven by economics as well as the number of Edina residents. Mr. Halden asked why can't it be both. Mr. Herring replied he keeps hearing that because of the soil we either have a quality bandy rink or a quality soccer field, the soil that is out there cannot be used for both. 9 Mr. Klus asked \vhat other soccer facilities are in Edina. Mr. Herring s1122esle.d that Mr. MacHolda have a report for the next Park Board meeting indicating where all of the soccer fields are in Edina, their look, use, location and who owns them. Ms. Sitek asked if staff would again look at what type of surface could be used for both. Mr. Herring agreed that staff should further study the possibility of dual surfaces to accommodate both sports. Mr. Herring thanked everyone for attending the meeting. Mr. Halden suggested to the Park Board to find another piece of land that could be converted into a youth soccer field instead of going through the painful process of trying to eliminate an ice sheet and inflame the neighborhood. V1. 1.1 RST TIER REGIONAL TRAIL - SRF ARCHITECTS Mr. Keprios introduced Del Miller fi-om Hennepin Parks and Adam Arvidson from SRF Architects who will talk about the first tier regional trail. Mr. Miller explained that Hennepin Parks is not'a part of the county government, they are a special park district set up by the legislature in 1957. He explained that the suburbs now number over 700,000 people and Minneapolis has approximately 350,000 people. 1 -le pointed out that the first ring suburbs are a lot smaller than the second ring suburbs and therefore the second ring suburbs have a lot of trails and park reserves. Mr. Miller indicated that park reserves are typically a couple thousand acres and a lot of them are on a significant body of water. More intense recreation park reserves have a much bigger component of natural resource management and preservation. Mr. Miller stated that Edina pays taxes to Hennepin Parks as a special park district and recently they realized they have never systematically gone back and really analyzed the ten first ring suburbs, particularly looking at trail connections. Therefore, they brought SRF Architects in to take a look at this. Adam Arvidson, SRF landscape architect, explained that he was hired by Hermepin Parks to loot: at first ring suburbs to see what kinds of parks and trails there are. He explained that the process started off with a steering committee. Members from each of the first I'1110 0 communities, including John Keprios, met and devised the process for how to go about the trail planning. He indicated that another planner and himself met with Mr. Keprios one day and actually drove around Edina to look at the facilities and see what possibilities there are for a regional park trail facility. He stated that the steering 'committee continues to meet and they are putting together a plan that Hennepin Parks would theoretically adopt as the first tier trails and green way plan. There are a variety of corridors shown throughout the first ring suburbs. He pointed out that some of them are being called "recommended contingent" which means it would be a great corridor but it needs railroad abandonment or major redevelopment. 10 I Mr. Arvidson explained that there are two other possible items to identify within Edina. One is Bredesen Park to receive help from Hennepin Parks and become a special trail because there is not enough acreage for it to be a regional park. He noted that the second item would be to incorporate a trail and a green way through Edina. He stated that if this were to happen, there would be a whole detail design phase that would have to be undertaken. He noted there are a lot of things that have to be worked out. Mr. Arvidson then stated if anyone has any ideas he would like to hear them because this is definitely not an absolute corridor. Mr. Arvidson then explained different possibilities of what can be done in natural environments with trails. Mr. Miller emphasized that this is a work in progress and that the implementation would definitely be driven by the communities. This would have to involve both Richfield and Edina; they have to know that both communities want it to happen and it's definitely going to be driven by the community. This would have to be something where the citizens of Edina, through their park commission and ultimately the City Council, feel it has merit. He indicated that this is something that might happen in three, five or ten years, timing is very critical. Mr. Keprios asked Mr. Miller to explain to the Park Board that if they go along with this what is the process. If this becomes a reality who pays for the development and maintenance. Mr. Miller replied that if everyone thinks this is a good idea conceptually then he would encourage the Park Board to tell the City Council that you think it's something worthwhile. If the City Council agrees that it's a good idea then they would start looking at it and would expect to pick up most of the costs involved. However, if every community came to them at the same time that might tap their resources, not only from a money standpoint but from a staff standpoint, etc. What is looked for from the city is where they have properties where they would give us an easement. Mr. Miller again stressed that this has to be community driven. Mr. Herring noted that we are not wedded to this specific trail to which Mr. Miller replied that is correct. This is just a draft, a conceptual idea. Mr. Herring indicated that he thinks a trail through Edina is a great idea and we should move forward with it. Mr. Keprios stated that he feels very strongly that this is a great opportunity for Edina residents that we should take a serious look at and Hennepin Parks is very open to us adjusting the plan to what we think might fit better. He stated that lie would like to see the Park Board go forward with working with Hennepin Parks and their consulting firm to establish a first tier trail through Edina. Linda Presthus I'LL MOVE TO WHAT HE SAID. Tom White - SECONDED MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 11 Mr. Keprios thanked Hennepin Parks and for all of their time and looks forward to workinw with them. \/11. CON1111UN1TY EDLiCATION SERVICES REPORT - LINDA PRESTHUS Ms. Presthus indicated that they approved the budget and spent most of the time talking about objections and considerations from Normandale School for the proposed referendum. The problem Nonnandale School has is that they were never recognized as a school, it was recognized as the Edina Community Center and didn't take into consideration that there are 500 and some kids at that school. V111. 07-11ER A. Minneapolis Off -Leash Area at Weber Park - Mr. Kcprios.infonned the Park Board, that the Minneapolis Park Board is proposing to develop an off - leash, run free dog area in the City of Edina on property that is owned by Minneapolis. He explained that the piece .of land has a Minneapolis well and building on it and it's a swampy area. Mr. Keprios stated that Mile Siitari, Edina Police Chief, has contacted them and told them that they would have to abide by Edina Code which cun-ently does not allow off -leash dogs on public property. Mr. Keprios stated that the Minneapolis Park Board is proposing to Felice in the area and sell season passes to which Edina residents will have to pay non- resident fees. Mr. Keprios stated that Edina's view is there is not enough parking spaces or access to toilet facilities. He informed the Park Board that there is going to be a public input meeting on Thursday, March 23', 7:00 p.m. at Linden Hills Park and he will be there to speak on behalf of this group. He noted that it's area] unique situation that they have put on the shoulders of the City if Edina. IX. .ADJOURNMENT Tom White MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 9:20 P.M. George Klus SECONDED THE MOTION. MEETING ADJOURNED. 12 6305 Ridgeview Drive Edina, MN 55439 April 7, 2000 Mr. Martin Scheerer Fire Chief Edina Fire Department Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Scheerer, Yesterday, my son, Doug, and I visited the station at 6250 Tracy Avenue, where we learned about fire safety and got to see the station, engines and equipment. This visit was necessary for Doug to earn his Wolf badge for Cub Scouts by the end of this month. Ruth of your office was very helpful in arranging the visit for us. We are grateful to firefighter /paramedic, Craig Essig, who did a wonderful job of explaining details to us and who took just the right approach with a shy 8 -year old. And Doug remembered all he learned and was able to answer Mr. Essig's questions at the end of the tour. We thank you and your department for allowing us to visit and for educating young people about fire safety and prevention. Sincerely, Leslie D. Snyder As Ott" yaj� mom_ Just to let you know how much your thoughtfulness is truly appreciated. J'hank You vC �n e- P -T - -) /'� �"f C) 0 'Ttw 1 you. _ �or� J n, ►��M cs Members of the City Council Cordon Hughes, City Manager Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th Street It is our opinion that when plans were made for the Community Center Project, that the effect on and potential danger to the Normandale Elementary students was not for one moment taken into consideration. We are extremely concerned mostly for our daughters safety. The fact that this would be an enormous inconvenience is simply irritating. That anyone would actually consider forcing parents to travel that far by foot just to get to their child in school, is unreasonable. That they would actually further consider risking our children's safety by renting out the auditorium, which gives unrestricted access to many of the classrooms, is absurd. It is obvious to us that the people involved in the planning of the project do not have children who currently are or have at any time been students at Normandale. Our strong suggestion would be to find a different location for either the gymnasiums or the elementary school. We have an 8 year old daughter _attending Norman" and a 4 year old son whom we had planned would also attend. We are strong advocates of the immersion program and are extremely happy with our daughters unique education. However, if this project goes through as planned, we will place our son in an alternative school due to our fear for his safety. We implore you to consider other sites for this project: Very Concerned Parents, C nnie er Stephen Larson IL w 1�- EDINA HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 2000 6:30 PM - YORKDALE TOWNHOMES OF EDINA Members Present Jim Campbell Carol Carmichiel Bert Finsand Betsy Flaten Idelle Longman Sharon Ming Members Absent Nancy Atchison Staff Present Susan Heiberg Guests Present Scott Beckman Gordon Hughes Tom Oye Lynne Westphal Greg Winter (Eileen Supple and Jim Zappa attended the Advantage Center overview but did not stay for the Commission meeting.) Scott Beckman, Vice President of Advantage Services, welcomed the Commissioners to the Advantage Center of CommonBond Communities located at Yorkdale Townhomes of Edina.. He explained that the mission of CommonBond Communities is to create affordable housing communities as stepping stones to success with a vision that sees the dignity of all people. In 29 years, CommonBond Communities has grown to become Minnesota's largest non - profit provider of affordable housing and services. Its 36 housing communities are located in 25 municipalities throughout the Twin Cities, providing homes for more than 3,400 families, seniors and people with special needs. Its clients' average household income is $11,000 per year, and more than 775 of the residents are children and teens. Scott described the "more- than - housing" approach to achieving the mission —youth programs for residents focusing on academic achievement, self - sufficiency programs for adults focusing on career and job development, and independent living services for residents at senior sites. CommonBond's safe affordable housing, combined with caring Advantage Services, provides the way for people to move from economic insecurity to more stable ground. At the Advantage Center, youth who are enthusiastic about learning and researching life choices come every day to sign up for computer time. Additionally, youth of all ages participate in the Study Buddies and Homework Center programs to work one -on -one with volunteer mentors to improve their academic skills. At this time, the Commission and Scott moved to the Community Room, where Gordon Hughes, Edina's City Manager, was welcomed. Gordon provided background information regarding the City of Edina's commitment to participate in local housing incentives within the framework of the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act, through vehicles such as the HRA and the East Edina Housing Foundation. The Foundation was created to undertake and promote community development projects, to provide assistance to non - profit developers and sponsors of low and moderate income housing and to utilize block grants from the City or other governmental units to carry out its role. It is a non - profit entity governed by a five - member board, and its boundaries are east of Tracy Avenue (as if Tracy extended all the way south to West 78`h Street) and south of the Crosstown —with activities being localized in the Edinborough and Centennial Lakes housing development. The Foundation has served as a conduit through which the HRA (the development authority for the City) provides financial assistance to certain purchasers of condominiums and is the holder of more than 250 second - mortgage loans. The Foundation currently has two programs in place: Edina Community Homebuyer Program and Edina Home Partners Program. The Homebuyer Program increases home ownership opportunities for low and moderate - income borrowers by providing additional funds for down payment and /or closing cost assistance for single dwelling homes. These non - interest - bearing second mortgage loans are paid off when the house is sold; upon maturity of the first mortgage or when the dwelling is no longer the borrower's principal residence. The,Home Partners Program provides second mortgage loans for basic home improvements in conjunction with a single dwelling home purchase for low and moderate income borrowers. Funds can be used for structural improvements —not decorating or remodeling. Principal and interest must be repaid upon maturity of the loan, when the house is sold or when the dwelling is no longer the borrower's principal residence. Additionally, low and moderate - income homeowners may be eligible for below- market rate, home improvement financing funded through the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency. Gordon explained that Edina participates in the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act with the aim of establishing affordable and life -cycle housing goals; at this time, Edina does its best to maintain its current affordability index despite the continual loss of affordable units due to market forces. An issue in Edina is that homes are being renovated into unaffordable housing; there is not much available within the $135,000 range. Currently, there is a massive amount of infusion of capital within the city, and growth occurs with the combination of a willing property owner, a developer and a banker. Gordon intimated that the Commission's role might be to look at mays to bridge the cultural differences between the residents of Yorkdale Townhomes with the community as a whole and how to link the low- income community with the labor force. The Commission could look at ways to create a community in which one lives, works and plays -- tackling the issue of how to develop a sense of awareness. Chair's Report. Betsy.Flaten introduced and the Commission welcomed the new members - Idelle Longman, Bert Finsand and Greg Winter —and there was an opportunity for introductions all around. Minutes Approved. In the minutes of January 25, 2000, the paragraph regarding affordable housing was pointed out in order to make the following change: "that next month's meeting be a dialogue (instead of `an opportunity to dialogue') with the appropriate person on issues around affordable housing." The motion of Tom Oye to approve the minutes of January 25, 2000, as amended was seconded by Sharon Ming; the motion carried. Nominating Committee. The motion of Betsy Flaten to create a nominating committee consisting of Sharon Ming, Jim Campbell and Betsy Flaten was seconded by Lynne Westphal; the motion carried. The nominating committee will present a slate of officers at next month's Commission meeting. CDBG Funding. The public services portion of the year -2000 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) budget recommended by Planning staff was presented and discussed. Noting the decrease in available funds, the Commissioners nevertheless raised a concern regarding staff's recommendation to simply divide the balance remaining between GMDCA and H.O.M.E. after appropriating CASH's amount. Giveri`the inadequacy of State funding to meet the ever - increasing need for childcare, a $4000 decrease to GMDCA would jeopardize its ability to continue moving families from "applications pending" and the "waiting list" to full service. Upon reviewing the reduced request for funding from H.O.M.E., the Commissioners noted that the East Edina Housing Foundation would be providing $12,900,to support the Program and additional money would come from the Greater Minneapolis Council of Churches. Apparently, Friends of H.O.M.E., an organization that solicits private donations, helps to fill the remaining gap between the City's CDBG, funds and the total Program expense. The Human Relations Commissioners unanimously agreed that, given the limited funds, it is imperative to continue the current level of support for GMDCA, notwithstanding this amount is $3000 below its proposal. The motion of Sharon Ming to approve the amounts submitted below for funding the public services portion of the year -2000 CDBG budget was seconded by Tom Oye: GMDCA $17,000 H.O.M.E. $ 9,189 CASH $ 1,100 The motion carried. It was agreed that a City planner be invited to next January's Commission meeting in order to begin the discussion of the year -2001 CDBG budget. The year -2000 proposed CDBG budget will go before the City Council for approval on March 6`h; Sharon Ming will represent the Commission. Community Council. Concerning FamiLink Edina, Sharon Ming reported that there is a staffing concern which prevents the Center from being open at all the designated times. The Center relies on contributed staff or volunteers from FamiLink partners for its staffing. These resource center staff respond to callers or visitors seeking connections to services and supports. Staff provide strength -based interviews, research and follow -up to individuals and families. When the staff are not taking calls, meeting with someone visiting the center or exploring possible referrals, they are developing an understanding of community resources and activities. They are also gaining skills in interviewing, using the FirstCallNet database and finding creative ways to help people. Sharon then explained revenue enhancement and the Local Collaborative Time Study (LCTS) regarding the Community Council's role in the development of a spending plan for Edina's LCTS dollars. The Council gets input from and endorsement by the - School District who generates the funds and from the other local collaborative partners. LCTS is a program in which new funds are raised for collaboratives through reimbursements from federal entitlement programs for specific health and social services to children provided through schools and other organizations. The-State of Minnesota authorized LCTS as part of the legislation establishing family services collaboratives and children's mental health collaboratives in 1993. FamiLink's Board of Directors entered into Hennepin County's LCTS Agreement in 1998, and currently Sharon Ming is one of the Edina representatives on the County's LCTS Policy Committee. Approximately $225,000 annually is generated from the LCTS in Edina's schools, and through the Community Council's development of a spending plan, most of the money goes back to the schools into programs such as family and learning support, asset building, mental health services and violence prevention. Connecting for Kids. Sharon Ming reported that Connecting for Kids — Edina's Asset Building for Youth Initiative —held a Town Meeting at the High School Auditorium on February 8`h at 7:00 PM. School District personnel and the Student Council President were a part of the program, and the results of the survey which was given to all 6 `h through 12 `h graders were reported by Dr. Judy Taccogna, Director /Education Sector of Search Institute. The Commission expressed interest in the results, wondering about cultural competency and how safe students felt in school. The Executive Summary will be given to each Commissioner. Changing Faces, Changing Communities. Lynn Westphal reported that the Edina League of Women Voters had undertaken an initiative made up of proactive discussions exploring issues surrounding immigration in co- sponsorship with Edina Public. Schools, the City of Edina, various community organizations, churches, businesses and ethnic groups. On February 8`h, the initiative was begun with a panel preparing participants for leading at least four small -group discussions. Lynne, Carol Carmichiel and Jim Campbell will be small -group facilitators, and presently the discussions are going well. Upcoming Events. Three upcoming events were identified: 1) League of Minnesota Human Rights Commissions 1' Regional Meeting and- Idea Exchange on March 25`h in Golden Valley; 2) City Council's Annual Meeting on March 16`h at Braemar Clubhouse; and 3) Volunteer Recognition Reception on April 25`h at Edinborough Park. Adjournment. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:15 PM. Respectfully submitted, Betsy Flaten, Chair Edina Human Relations Commission BF /sh April 6, 2000 Dear Mayor, City Council Members and City Administrator; We the members of the Family Council of the Maranatha Care Center, located in Brooklyn Center, MN, have been working diligently this legislative session to bring attention to the plight of the Nursing Home/Long Term Care industry and its employees. We have already sponsored one legislative forum in our immediate area and have testified before the House Human Services Committee. We also initiated a letter writing, email, and media campaign trying to raise awareness of the problems. Now we are moving to the next step. On April 29h we are sponsoring our second informational Legislative Forum and are expanding the area to include more Nursing Homes/Long Term Care facilities, their representatives, and their Family Councils. A flyer is enclosed for you to post, copy and mail. We are inviting you — the city officials with facilities in the immediate affected areas - to attend this very important forum. Legislators from the area are also invited along with representatives from the State Department of Human Services and Senior Advocacy Councils. Our goal is to get all interested parties in one room for hands on discussion of the problems — with input from the individuals /agencies who deal with these problems daily. We need to educate our Legislators and present them with solutions. You can help in this process by attending or sending representatives to this Forum. Please contact your staff and anyone else you feel would be interested in attending. Spread the word. Working together we can find solutions to this problem. Please contact me if you have any questions. I can be reached at 763 - 560 -3621 (please leave a message) or emailed at cssi@gsfamily.net. I look forward to meeting each and every one of you. Sincerely, Peg Snesrud 7849 Xerxes Ct. N. Brooklyn Park, MN 55444 (OVER) Nursing Homes, their problems, and looking for solutions... Areas. of discussion will include funding for Nursing Homes, rate structures, employee reimbursement, the future of long term care, and other Senior living concerns. If you work fora nursing home, have a loved one in a senior facility, or run a facility, this meeting is for you. Speakers will include representatives from Long Term Care Nursing staff, Legislators, Dept. of Human Services, Nursing Home administration, and Senior Advocates. Saturday, April 29, 2000 2:00 - 4:OOPM Brooklyn Park Senior Center 5600 85th Ave. N. Presented by the Maranatha Family Council, 5401 69th Ave. N., Brooklyn Center, Mn 55429. For more information call 763 - 560 -3621. Patrick & Anne Marie Olk 5315 Pinewood Trail Edina, MN 55436 Home Phone (952) 922 -6393 April 11, 2000 Mr. Dennis Maetzold Mayor, City of Edina 5110 Arden Ave. Edina, MN 55424 Re: Grandview Square and Sherwood Park We are writing to you regarding the Grandview Square development. On March 27, 2000, OPUS/Ron Clark presented their current plan to the residents of our neighborhood. We were very disappointed to find that the plan has changed to include much of Sherwood Park for residential construction. The developers are proposing four story condominiums to be constructed in Sherwood Park along Sherwood Road and ending approximately 65 feet from single family homes. Not only does this park get used extensively by our neighborhood, it is one of the reasons why we purchased our current home. In addition, the park's layout provides a nice buffer zone between our neighborhood and the existing commercial property (soon to be Grandview Square). We feel strongly that Sherwood Park should be left alone and not included in this development. As you may already know, the Planning Commission at their March 29th meeting voted not to use the park as part of this development. The Edina Park Board which met on April 11, also does not want Sherwood Park to be developed. In addition, we do not want the park to be reconfigured to allow the residential portion of the Grandview Square development to be closer to single family homes in our neighborhood. The park will provide a nice transition from multi - family to single family residences. The height of the proposed residential buildings adjacent to the park is especially concerning. Four story buildings towering over the entrance to our neighborhood and nearby homes, clearly isn't in the best interest of our neighborhood. We would like to see the developers create multi - family residential units less than four stories high along the park property. We understand that the layout of the site plan, which was presented to the City Council when it selected OPUS /Ron Clark for the Grandview Square development last fall, had to be revised to address the requests of the Hennepin County Library. (We have attached the original site plan and the most recent site plan for your review). We do like the latest proposed relocation of the Library/Senior Center, but not at the expense of the park land. We hope that the requests of the library and the financial goals of OPUS /Ron Clark do not outweigh the needs of current residents in this Edina neighborhood. Given the most recent site plan, we would like to have the condominiums removed from the park land and to lower the building height of the remaining residential units bordering the park. If that is not possible, we propose that the development use the original site plan (dated 10/6/99) and still limit the height of the residential units closer to the park. As you said in the spring edition of About Town "Edina's infrastructure - streets, utilities, parks and public buildings - are the essential components of the foundation of our city. The quality of life in a city is defined, in part, by its infrastructure." Please do not allow Sherwood Park to be used as part of this development and please limit the height of the condominium units close to our park. This area is where we - and nearly 50 other families - have made our home for many years. Our Edina neighborhood would like to maintain its quality of life. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sm* ely, 40 l� l ?� .> jam. - �xx�� -- t _ < � - �� i f l �) / �� 9rr�� �i• ! - , ' � � 1 � � �1r }r - ..,� � � '� ,:r rj' ` _ - _-._ r 1`i' J67j � 4.� - �f•�..+ u -1,_ -•� � � :e�_ , , vf io ©' i II f '8f��1 •�� ��['S�j r� as-r -9' i v t 9W i "'�' "''r `•� --r -'� T�� �.�_ �� �� f R _� �4[9' :�3 r+e,, �a\, ' �. � .er� �`r� ti�` jf s 71 .a��''? d* z e BLrY �N iii • \,* "�'"� "�'_ `$• .a � `/ti -r � � .;,�_ I' p. � ��� A , n i...r., / /�- 'v -S:.`3'•r � „2y, 4$.. � ,1111`` �.. ' . t .w,• \rte rr a T • ' .�■�n y / -- r', :-✓''�`'r' 17. Grandview Square Edina, MN 10 -06 -99 co 50 100 2( 'lad , OPUS. A Development of Opus Northwest SITE PI AI t � ��r p mUyor Out i.JL"�all April 12, 2000 Mayor Dennis Maetzold Council Members Nan Faust, James Hovland, Scott Johnson, and Michael Kelley. Dear Mayor and Council Members; I write again to request that you reject the current Opus /Clark proposed development plan, and instruct them to submit a revised plan which takes no land from Sherwood Park. I look forward to speaking with you at the meeting on April 18, 2000 as you discuss the Overall Development Plan Approval and Preliminary Rezoning for the "Kunz- Lewis" property. I am supplementing my previous letter of March 29, 2000 with additional comments toward the same purpose- s loss of land or change in boundaries to the current Sherwood Park. At the Planning Commission Hearing on 3/29/00 and the Park Board Hearing on 4/11/00, Opus /Clark advanced two primary reasons for their current and renewed incursion into Sherwood Park: 1) The Edina City Council desires and encourages it; and 2) The Hennepin County Library wants to be visible from Vernon. I find the rationale that you desire, have encouraged, or will tolerate the incursion into Sherwood Park not believable. I, and my neighbors, attended your meetings last Fall during which we believe you made it clear that Sherwood Park was not to be used in this development. We value your support of existing neighborhoods and parkland. I do not believe that you intend the Richmond Hills neighborhood to bear a disproportionate share of the cost of this development. The loss of Sherwood Park in its current configuration would negatively affect all 48 existing homeowners in Richmond Hills. The reconfiguration and loss of area from Sherwood Park would affect all property owners' quality of life as well as both the perceived and the real economic value of their property. The dominating character of proposed large buildings would exacerbate these losses. I encourage you to consider the following points: 1) Sherwood Park is an integral part of the existing neighborhood and has been so for over 50 years. Homeowners purchased or built homes here, in part, due to Sherwood Park. 2) Sherwood Park has been an important buffer for the Richmond Hills neighborhood from the relatively low (one to two stories, flat roofed) small businesses in the area. It will be an even more important buffer from the proposed relatively tall (four stories, peaked roof, 50+ feet tall) and dense proposed condo /townhouse units immediately adjacent to the park. In the developer's proposal, the developer claims no net loss of parkland. That does not appear accurate: 1) The developer's new "additions" to the eastern and northeastern comers of the Park appear to be no more than 21 feet wide. They are used in the developer's drawing as "landscape buffer" to the development —not as open park space. Landscape buffer should not count as park space. In fact, Sherwood Park appears to be reduced from 1.55 acres to @ .9 acres —a 42% reduction in area. 2) The developer proposes to take an area of open parkland approximately 225 feet by 135 feet from an open area of the park that is only 283 feet by 135 feet. 3) The "townsquare" in the center of the development created to "replace" the open play area of Sherwood Park will not be conducive to play. It is surrounded by streets, reduced by the need for two -way traffic on the northwest side, and will be dominated by the development owners. This "townsquare" is not intended —and will not be used by neighborhood children —as play area. 4) The relocated child play area is not conducive to child safety. 5) This is not the proposed land use you accepted last Fall. 6) The proposed development nearest the Richmond Hills single family homes continues to be too tall. There has been no reduction in height of the proposed condo / townhomes. Instead, the developer has placed them closer to existing single family homes while maintaining their 50+ foot height. Please reject the current Opus /Clark redevelopment plan. Do not permit the developer to use any of the existing land in Sherwood Park for the development— either for construction of buildings or for landscape buffer. Delay approval of this redevelopment and rezoning until both the land use issues and design issues are clear. Please know the design and dimensions of the proposed buildings prior to approval. Thank you for your consideration. S' erely, John Menke 5301 Pinewood Trail Edina, MN 55436 612 - 922 -2608