Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2000-05-16_COUNCIL PACKET
AGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL MAY 16, 2000 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Adoption of the .Consent Agenda is made by the Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Commissioner, Council Member or citizen so requests it. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the Agenda. I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA - Regular Meeting of May 2, 2000 Rollcall II. GRANDVIEW SQUARE DEVELOPMENT A. Redevelopment Agreement B. Assignment of Purchase Agreement, 5201 Eden Circle C. Indemnification Agreement D. Condemnation Resolution E. Land Exchange with Hennepin County . Rollcall III. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS - as per pre -list dated 5/10/2000, TOTAL: $541,261.59 IV. ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL PROCLAMATION: NATIONAL PUBLIC WORKS WEEK, MAY 21-27,2000 * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of May 2, 2000 II. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS - Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Planner Public Comment heard. Motion to close hearing. Zoning Ordinances: First and Second Reading require 4/5 favorable rollcall of all members of Council to. pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall of all members. of Council to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. Conditional Use Permit: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. Rollcall A PRELIMINARY REZONING AND OVERALL DEVELOPMENT PLAN - Opus /Clark - Grandview Square Rollcall . B. FINAL PLAT APPROVAL Olinger Ridge - 5804 Olinger Road III. ORDINANCES First Reading: Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second Reading: Favorable rollcall vote. of all Council members to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall of all members of Council to pass. Rollcall A. ORDINANCE NO. 2000-5 = Ordinance Amending Section 450 Swimming Pools Rollcall Agenda/ Edina City Council May 16, 2000 Page 2 B. ORDINANCE NO. 2000-6 - Ordinance Amending Section 740 Parking Garages IV. AWARD OF BID A. Type III Ambulance -Fire Department B. Year 2000 Sanitary Sewer Improvement, Contract 00 -1, Continued from May 2, 2000 C. Cargo Van, Public Works D. Two Dump Truck Boxes (1 tandem & 1 single axle) V. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS A. Traffic Safety Staff Review of May 1, 2000 B. I-494 Corridor Commission Funding for 494/35W Interchange VI. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS VII. CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS VIII. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES IX. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL X. MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEM XI. FINANCE Rollcall A. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS As Per Pre -List Dated 5/10/2000 TOTAL: $908,848.99 Thur May 18 Mon May 29 Tues Jun 6 Tues Jun 20 Tues Jul4 Wed Jul5 Tues Jul 18 Tues Aug 1 Tues Aug 15 SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS PUBLIC WORKS OPEN HOUSE 4 -7 P.M. MEMORIAL DAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. INDEPENDENCE DAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS IN REFERENCE TO A PREVIOUS COUNCIL INQUIRY, THE ATTACHED STAFF REPORT by John Keprios MAY RESPOND TO CONCERNS OF THE COUNCIL AT THE THE 5:00 P.M. SPECIAL MEETING t I r. owe • ,N�bRPOR�'Tv� 1668 REPORUREC0 MME NDATION To: Mayor Maetzold and members of Agenda Item the Edina City Council. From: John Keprios, Director Consent ❑ Park & Recreation Department Information Only ® Date: May 11, 2000 Mgr. Recommends To HRA ® To Council ❑ Subject: Operating Expenses for Dome and Motion Field House. ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion INFO /BACKGROUND: At the most recent joint meeting with the Edina School Board, the City Council asked about operating expenses for the proposed dome and field house facilities. Therefore, I have attached a copy of our consultant's (Anderson - Johnson Associates, Inc.) cost estimates for the dome, Option No. 2. The operating costs, including take down and set up costs per season, are estimated to be approximately $48,000 per year. In accordance with the Joint Powers Agreement, the School District shall be entitled to charge fees for the use of the dome for City- sponsored activities. The intent is to minimize the expense per hour for city- sponsored and District- sponsored events and to charge all other private rentals at market value rates. The facility use fee shall be the same for both district - sponsored uses and City- sponsored uses. I am reluctant to suggest a fee analysis for the dome simply because the District will ultimately have that responsibility. Also included is a copy of the Fieldhouse Analysis provided by the District. The analysis shows that there is an anticipated $18,260 per year shortfall in expenses that will be covered by charging gym use fees at all existing gymnasiums at a rate of $4.00 per hour. I prepared an analysis of the impact per participant given a $4.00 per hour fee and a copy of those "Funding Results" is also attached for your review. 'r` t ANDERSON- JOHNSON _- ASSOCIATES, s INC. _ _ _- Landscape Architecture • Site Planning • Civil Engineering March 14, 2000 John Keprios Director of Parks & Recreation City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina,'MN 55424 -1394 Re: Fabric Dome Structure Edina Community Center Campus Dear Mr. Kepnos, On Monday, February 28, 2000, you authorized Anderson- Johnson Associates, Inc. (AJA) to consider the options of placing a fabric dome structure on sites within the Community Center campus. Three optional site locations were to be considered. They are described as follows: Option No. 1 - Kuhlman Field to be substantially enclosed including'the football/soccer field and the`eight -lane running track. Option No. 2 - Kuhlman Field, to enclose the area within the track oval from three feet inside the track running surface (east and west sides) and terminating ten feet beyond the football end zones (north and south). Option NO. 2A - Same as Option No. 2 above except extend the north and south ends of the fabric structure to follow the curved arc of the running track. Option No. 3 North Practice Field. Enclose a re- constructed practice field located between the Community Center and Southview Middle School buildings. To determine the feasibility of each site, AJA researched the availability of appropriate fabric structures. A manufacturer and product was subsequently selected that was high in quality and that had a long history in fabricating, installing and servicing fabric dome structures.:The manufacturer also had a number of structures in place and functioning satisfactorily in the Minnesota area. Although other manufacturers and products are available, our feasibility considerations are based on one manufacturer assuming others would adapt appropriately. THE DOME STRUCTURE The dome is a fabric structure constructed of high strength flame resistant PVC coated polyester material. The fabric structure generally has a ten year pro -rated warranty provided by the VALLEY SQUARE OFFICE CENTER SUITE 200 7575 GOLDEN VALLEY ROAD MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55427 PH (612) 544 -7129 • FAX (612) 544 -0531 man ufacturer. The useful life expectancy is considered to be eighteen to twenty years. THE MECHANICAL SYSTEM The mechanical system required to heat and inflate the dome structure is located outside the . structure enclosure. The remote system provides a complete station of controls, heat exchangers and air chambers necessary to convey the warm air through underground ducts to the dome structure. THE LIGHTING Interior lighting is provided by a high intensity metal halide indirect lighting system. The system utilizes optical reflectors to maximize lighting uniformity on the playing surface. The light level on the playing surface is approximately 45 to 50 foot-candles. THE SITE IMPACTS Placing the fabric structure has.a number of physical'impacts on any given site. Those-impacts are: Anchoring - The very nature of a hot air inflated structure requires substantial anchoring to secure its position and to keep it grounded. Anchoring is accomplished by constructing a concrete grade beam (two feet wide and four feet deep) continuously along the outside perimeter of the structure. Snow Removal - Continuous removal of snow from the perimeter of the structure is critical. Space must be provided to allow access for removal and for storage of snow throughout the winter snow season. Snow removal is generally accomplished by hand operated power snow- throwing equipment. Care must be taken not to damage sensitive surfaces existing at the dome's perimeter: Mechanical Area - Heating, air handling and control systems require •adequate space outside the dome structure. The location must.be accessible for the initial installation and for subsequent servicing. An area approximately 60 feet by 30 feet is. required. Storage Area Storage space must be provided for the fabric, lighting system and other components during.the period the structure is down. The storage can be "outside, "but will require an area approximately 25 feet by 25 feet. Access - Access to the dome structure must be provided for users and spectators, including handicapped persons. An .enclosed walkway is generally provided to a point of controlled entry. The point of controlled entry is often a small building housing a facility manager and public toilets. Playfield - Placement of the dome structure over a playing field requires the field surface consist of a synthetic turf material. Natural grass can not survive within a domed environment. THE SITE CONSIDERATIONS Option No.1 Placement of a dome structure at Option No. 1 location can be accomplished; however, there are a number of site conditions that make this location less desirable. They are addressed as follows: Size - The overall dimensions of the structure would be approximately 280 feet wide by 600 feet long with a total floor space of 151,175 square feet. The height of the structure, impacted by its length and width would be approximately 90 feet. The structure may physically and aesthetically appear forced on the site. Initial Cost - The initial cost of the structure would be higher due to its size. The cost of heating and air handling equipment would be greater as reflected by larger capacities necessary to accommodate larger dome volume. Operating Cost - The continuous operating costs would be higher as reflected by the larger mechanical equipment and the greater volume of interior space to heat and inflate. Storage Space - Additional space would be required to store the additional fabric and equipment generated by a larger dome structure. Snow Removal and Storage - Perhaps the most constraining factor of Option No. 1 is the inability to remove snow from the structure's perimeter. The structure would be anchored immediately adjacent to a four foot high spectator control fence allowing no space to access snow, removal equipment. Option No. 2 Placement of a dome structure at Option No. 2 location can be accomplished with limited constraints. They are addressed as follows: Size - The overall dimension of the Option No. 2 Dome would be approximately 210 feet wide and 380 feet long, with a total floor space of 79,800 square feet. The height of the structure would be approximately 65 feet. Initial Cost - The initial cost would be 53% less than Option No. 1 due to reduced size. Operating Cost - The operating cost would be less than Option No. 1 due to reduced volume. Storage Space - The storage space required would be less than Option No. 1 due to reduced material. Snow Removal and Storage - Adequate space is available to access snow blowing equipment. Snow storage would be accomplished on the east and west running track straight -aways and in the end areas within the track oval. Owner must be aware that extreme care must be exercised when removing snow at the dome perimeter from the track edge. Owner must also be aware that snow stored on the running track will delay the use of the track for early spring training until snow melt occurs. Snow storage may also cause uneven water patterns on the track surface. Option No. 2A Placement of a dome structure at Option No., 2A location can be accomplished with limited constraints. They are addressed as follows: Size - The overall dimension of the Option No. 2A dome is approximately 212.feet wide by 520 feet long, with a total floor space of 99;736 square feet. The height of the structure would remain the same as in Option No. 2. The additional space would allow for simultaneous multi -sport events. Initial Cost - The initial cost would be 23% greater then Option No. 2, but less than Option No. I. Operating Cost - The operating cost would be greater than Option No. 2 but less than Option No. 1. Storage Space - The storage space required would be greater than Option No. 2, but less than Option No. 1. Snow Removal and Storage - Similar to Option No. 2 with the exception that all removal and storage must occur on the running track. Option No. 3 Placement of.a dome structure at Option No. 3 location can be accomplished with limited constraints. They are addressed as follows: Size - The overall dimension of the Option No. 3 dome is approximately 180 feet wide by 320 feet long, with a total floor space of 57,6000 square feet. The height of the structure is approximately 60 feet. Initial Cost - The initial cost would be 18% less than Option No-. 2. Operating Cost - The operation cost would be less than Option No. 2. Storage Space -. Storage space for the dome fabric and other components is unavailable at this location without the loss of approximately three parking stalls. Mechanical Space Space for heating, air handling and control equipment is unavailable at this location without the loss of approximately three parking stalls. Snow Removal and Storage - Adequate space is available to access snow blowing equipment at perimeter of the structure. Some snow storage may occur on parking lots adjacent to the dome. Setbacks - The 50 foot setback requirement from Southview Lane on the north will impact the length of the structure. If a dome structure were to be constructed at this location it would prohibit future use of the site for regulation football. ESTIMATED COSTS Option No. 1 Initial Cost $1,815,000. Operating Costs, per season $60,000 to $70,000 Take down and set up, per season $17,000 to $18,000 Option No. 2 Initial Cost $969,000. Operating Costs, per season $30,000 to $35,000 Take down and set up, per season $12,000 to $13,000 Option No. 2A Initial Cost $1,194,000. Operating Costs, per season $40,000 to $45,000 Take down and set up, per season $13,000 to $15,000 Option No. 3 Initial Cost $793,000. Operating Costs, per season. $25,000 to $30,000 Take down and set up, per season $10,000 to $11,000 The above considerations provide a description of optional locations, unique constraints at each location and an estimate of costs. We trust this information will assist you in drawing conclusions and in making a critical programming decision. Thank you for allowing us to continue serving the City of Edina. Respectfully submitted, ,&DERSON JOHNSON ASSOCIATES, INC 03/06,/00 MON 16:52 FAX 6129282601 EDINA COMMUNITY CENTER Using the same formula please note the new ana ysis is as follows: Fieldhouse A mlygl GM Use RE ISED 3/6/00 Group 4 of Hours of Use Expense Balance City related (current use) _ City rclated (projected additional use) E.P.S. (projected fieldhouse) 3,755 Y 50 -� Total 4,565 Operational Costs Item Rej enue Expense Balance -� Projected Operational Cost $90,151 ($90,151) $ 5,000 Mooty Endowment Fund $65,000 Anticipated Rcntal $7,500 Sub -Total $72,500 $90,151 ($17,651) Proposed Gym Rental Fee ($4.00/hr.) $18,260 $18,260 _ —� _56 "7.0 $90,760 ` x$90,151 09 io 002 FUNDING RESULTS GYM % OF TOTAL COST PER Assuming 4,565 hours X $4.00 per gym per hour charge = $18,260 in city related program use. ADDITIONAL COST PER HOURS GYM USE GROUP EGAA Basketball 455 10% $1,826 Girls Traveling 866 19% 3,469 EBA House 907 20% 3,652 EBA Traveling 973 21% 3,835 Adult Basketball 153 3% 548 Adult Volleyball 138 3% 548 EGAA Volleyball 313 7% 1,278 E.P.S. 760 17% 3.104 4,565 100% $18,260 Assuming 4,565 hours X $4.00 per gym per hour charge = $18,260 in city related program use. ADDITIONAL COST PER 2,509 PARTICIPANTS PARTICIPANT EGAA Basketball 490 $3.73 Girls Traveling 120 $28.91 EBA House 990 $3.69 EBA Traveling 120 $31.96 Adult Basketball 207 $2.65 Adult Volleyball 182 $2.65 EGAA Volleyball 410 $3.12 2,509 May 16, 2000 John Keprios Manager Park & Recreation Edina, City of 4801 W. 50th. St. Edina, MN- 55424 Dearjohn, I am writing to let you know that the Edina Soccer Club Board fully supports the proposed referendum planned jointly with the City of Edina and the Edina School District. We are extremely excited to see our community have the chance to upgrade and expand facilities for many different categories of use. All of the proposed items will enhance and enrich our community as we move forward in the new century. The addition of state of the art facilities will be an advantage for future generations to come! Also, I would like to let you know of our interest in renting time in the proposed dome at Kuhlman Field. We currently rent time from roughly November Irst. through Mid -April at the Academy of Holy Angels in Richfield. We were one of the original anchor tenants of this facility. We average between 5 to 7.5 hours per week in rental time at an average of $150.00 per hour for half of the field. It is anticipated at a lower cost to our players, parents, and teams we could achieve even larger use of indoor time. The proposed facility and field upgrades would definitely address the needs of the soccer community as we approach 3200 players in Edina between the ages of 6 and 18 years of age both male and female. However, a dome facility would also be multi- purpose and support many other forms of use by sports as well as community organizations. Not to mention the adjacent cities that can't get dome time to rent and constantly attempt to purchase time from our club. It is refreshing to see that the City and School District can work together to provide services that will in the long run be beneficial to all concerned. Please let me know how I can be of assistance. Sincerely, Jeffrey Bohlig Board Member Edina Soccer Club cc: ESC Board pep Educational Sports Programs, Inc. 5126 Roberts Place • Edina, Minnesota 55436 Phone /Fax: (952) 915 -9009 • E -mail: espsoccerCaol.com www.espsoccertraining.com I ERVER- CHING TEAM TRAINING • INDIVIDUAL TRAINING • COACN EDUCATION • GOALKEEPER TRAINING • CLUB TRAINERS 16th May 2000 Dear Edina School District and Edina City Council Members, I am writing this letter to support the entire City Referendum and, in particular to support the Dome Project which I believe will be a huge benefit to Local Residents. I am speaking as an Edina resident myself, an Edina parent of young children, a long standing member of the Edina Soccer Community, an Edina High School Head Soccer Coach and a local businessman who conducts my Soccer Education business from my Edina office at my home. Over the past eight years I have provided more than 120 Soccer Coaching Directors to Minnesota Area Clubs and also provide year round training for Soccer Clubs and individual soccer players. As such, I have worked in almost every domed facility in Minnesota and have seen the huge benefits they bring to different facets of the community. I was on the feasibility committee for the Academy of Holy Angels Stardome in Richfield which has been hugely successful over the past 5 -6 years. As a business, I would rent several hours per week of any prospective dome in Edina, basically reverting my Holy Angels hours over to Edina. I would also continue my work with Edina Soccer Club and the Edina Soccer Association, which would mean several more hours of rental time. Presently more than 300 players a week were traveling to the Stardome to practice there, and paying $150 an hour for half of the dome space. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to call me. Yours Sincerely, Simon Whitehead Vice - President of ESP Inc. - Head Girls Soccer Coach, Edina High School Soccer Training Partner with Edina Soccer Club, 1989 to present 120 rf A-le 4 1,2 YAL _aOiNyK May 10, 2000 Dear Mayor Maetzold, Messrs. Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, and Ms. Faust, We are writing to express our opposition to the proposal to build a field house next to Normandale Elementary School and to register our concern with a decision - making process that appears seriously flawed to us. We are opposed to the siting of the field house next to Normandale because we believe the site is already overcrowded with facilities and the field house will further compromise the security of the school. The new project would also worsen access on a site that already experiences significant access problems. . We were dismayed at the original proposal to hold a referendum on the fieldhouse and other facilities improvements in May, at a time when most Normandale families had not even heard about the project. While the omission may not have been intentional, the failure to communicate with and consult the school community has left a legacy of distrust. We write to advocate that the referendum question be 1) pushed to the general election in November and 2) be split into two parts so that necessities such as classroom additions are separated from the issue of building the fieldhouse. The referendum should be held in November and not September because the general election would draw the most voters and constitute a more equitable venue for deciding on a tax issue. We do not think that necessities such as classroom additions at Concord and Valley View should be bundled into one referendum question with the fieldhouse project which is clearly optional. This bundling pits parents who legitimately support classroom additions against us parents who believe the fieldhouse project to be misguided and detrimental to the children of Normandale Elementary. While we would be pleased to pay more taxes to support classroom additions at other schools in the district, we are opposed to paying taxes for a fieldhouse. Sincerely, Ma ee Paul Glewwe 6704 West Trail Edina Mn 55439 q&)l uj 5�0 sfreet- Eclina, M4 G"SgDV Streef- �CCr�cc�, v /���s c� F �d�za C�owne� j�rd ofEd�,rraho�r _ Z have .bee., -c 3 �esid6,tf OF Ecti%ca /,c)as = to Cancord v�schoo i crlr�--� C055 �z elr7tw Schoo/)) Soullwle*60 ��h c+�d 9ro�dua�e of �� �Jighs�lx�o✓ In I9�� rru4 h hc� �, �cI Iour chased fie, h,t)rlz are -fie cornew- op u.&t59x sf a�jc! &M7 Drale -For g, c(fic reams . AJo, use .Z5 on a G'ul de lgoc /()D. C072 t�et ap was Cis) a Gr�i�der�'u/ o�Prn die %l,!„�se%a // c��a�nor�e( r�/-��l field uJifl� ruhn� tracl2 a�a�lal� 1rrn�- ch�ldr�r to G�'�j oh w�out- �av��9 f� Cro55 a� str2� -LtS. 7Gci6 rtei9h&rhD0d ha.s hen ui&t-p/ace fo raises �Gu/dl-eii; Ovet' 20 ur�c�C,f2clC�r�t, f1'te�'2 �r� 13 eh� /c� ea� 4r�h Do I/e avc C{ (.l�le5f'�.��'' 9�, 7�/s 1?OflaKQ., rrrrfv ° C. a7�5�LCrb-r�ZOrl92Q- i2i.�2.yCGL d?��,�� a blrmclta,� p /aye f?y �pU� -�mprzoroh,( hqieb6V1 5aFfha /l r�-ces efc. 7G� is _7s our ��Oar���p� rc�� t�cei� �o9s Gyre, �ocv ��X never !mod � .'a somea�- Glas r?'?aQe a miss. f� orte corrz�o /a� �7 t i�,Xr..s ids fix�°qi nq �'a Cri�nlo f� �c ufer'��' �-d �?�af cols fec�e� sp?cl&), ��e �d chafe vh f�.e -fair //o���le, _ 0/� Oar eon��:r'r� �s tG�e l�9ht� �� t4 ar-v harse. kle the, Iof close,- A)07z 0 `noircfivri tk-a� nDis'c., Clind Corr�r�iliis l- ru�ee�ryr��eX �cplr� wid add & rK4,4, 12��r�e�- woctild ia! n1eho Gru h e o aYca� 14. hue, �TO�-. rg vd _G�- F��i��-�r�' • leaf tia�Oelv) ee/fo� 'rilw, r�, cam 0,)O-r'e"eCc7 O�J�SeGi 1� �LGS (%(7mp/eiZ', yo A LcIIfI U The Proposal (turn page over to see map): A list of items, totaling $31 million, including: • A 3- gymnasium fieldhouse with a running track connected to the Edina Community Center (ECC), to be built on the current south parking lot (see letter "D "). • New south parking lot on current site of McCarthy Field, between 59th Street and proposed fieldhouse (see letter `B1 "). • Retractable dome and artificial grass on Kuhlman Field for year -round public use (see letter "A "). • Renovations to the 770 -seat auditorium in the ECC (see letter "K "). • A new gymnasium at Concord Elementary School with a shell for classroom space underneath. The School District has stated that it will address Concord's classroom shortage regardless of whether the referendum goes forward (see letter "E "). The Money: • The funds for construction will be raised through a property tax increase. • Edina School District will pay to operate and maintain all ECC facilities. Concerns: • New and existing gymnasiums, 8 in total, will be rented out for training camps and state -wide tournaments to help defray operating costs. • Tournament use will increase traffic; parking and noise • Increased traffic could pose a threat to safety and security of neighborhood children. • Increased traffic and expansion of the ECC campus may negatively impact property values. • Neighborhood was not represented on the ECC Planning Task Force. • Neighborhood was not notified of proposed changes to ECC campus. Write or call! Edina City Council 4801 West 50'h Street, Edina, MN 55424 Phone 927 -8861; fax 826 -0390 Mayor Dennis Maetzold 904 -8919 Michael Kelly 336 -3403 Scott Johnson 944 -5102 James Hovland 874 -8550 Nan Faust 935 -5807 Edina Board of Education Voice mailbox for all members: 928 -2691 x7300 Phyllis Kohler (Chair) 927 -7892 Frank Bennet 929 -0261 John O. Murrin, III 925 -4682 Tim Walsh 942 -9256 Peyton Robb 926 -9439 Colleen Feige 935 -5540 Maureen Andre- Knudsen 925 -1813 Edina Public Schools, 5701 Normandale Road, Edina MN 55424; phone 928 -2500; fax 928 -2501 Kenneth Dragseth, Ph.D., Superintendent of Schools Terry Tofle, Ph.D., Assistant Superintendent of Elementary Education K G H, J A A 131 N W P RKI G 62 I/ - --- I oll Be a 0 0 1 1E �Fk OEM CONCOR e, I VIEN RY. CH OL 1:3 qc, - RESIDE NTIAL AREA uj C3 Ix 0 u z 0 0 E '2 El SCHOOL RD. PROPOSED EDINA COMMUNITY CENTER CAMPUS PLAN VJI I -(edlk(t- 1411 V LUt Of f6.,Q- 1-k B _._._._.._�_ I SO THV THVIEWLANE i ,-- y-- F SOUTHVIEW qEDINA 'FOOTBAL. MIDDLE SCHOOL EDINA COMMUNITY - -fAELD--- , C r T,;. ENTER T F- - I J EWL ME 9 131 N W P RKI G 62 I/ - --- I oll Be a 0 0 1 1E �Fk OEM CONCOR e, I VIEN RY. CH OL 1:3 qc, - RESIDE NTIAL AREA uj C3 Ix 0 u z 0 0 E '2 El SCHOOL RD. PROPOSED EDINA COMMUNITY CENTER CAMPUS PLAN VJI I -(edlk(t- 1411 V LUt Of f6.,Q- 1-k HAROLD M. LARSON 4800 School Road Edina, Minnesota 55424 -1718 May 14, 2000 Mr. Dennis Maetzold, Mayor Dear Sir: Phone (952) 927 -9354 E -Mail hlarson @mn.uswest.net This letter is my objection to the $15,000,000.00 Public Recreation and Athletic facility proposed for the area South and East of the Community Center. My wife and I have lived at our present address since 1957 and have always and will always support anything that will inrich and expand the educational climate for our children. BUT We, as citizens of Edina and in such proximity to this development were never notified of or represented on the ECC Planning Task Force. AS WE SHOULD HAVE BEEN. We, as citizens of Edina and in such proximity to this development were never notified of these proposed changes to the ECC campus, AS WE SHOULD HAVE BEEN. In the event that these new facilities are as successful as you feel they will be, there is obviously not enough parking provided. This means that the residential streets Concord Ave, School Road, Ruth Drive and W. 59th Street will be heavily used creating, not only parking problems for the residents of those streets but a considerable traffic hazard for the children living there. Is this really what you want to accomplish? The way in which these proposals are being rammed down our throats is for too secretive to be fair to those of whose real estate values will be adversely affected. Another point, how so you propose to compensate us for this loss in real estate valuation? Referring to the 2nd and 3rd paragraphs above, this seems like 'Taxation without representation" which is a very sneaky way of doing business. If you MUST have this development, why not locate it in the Braemar area where there would be no citizen conflict. A DOMED STADIUM? Really? Give us a break. That is totally ridiculous! Be assured that you will face CONSIDERABLE neighborhood resistance to this proposal "' having only one PUBLIC meeting these many problems just is not enough. Sincerely 4 petition 1 file: / / /Cl/My Documents /petition 1.html ` PETITION TO THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL AND BOARD OF EDUCATION We the undersigned do not believe that the Community Center is an appropriate site for a three - gymnasium fieldhouse and request that the City Council and School Board select another site. Name (print) Address Schools/ProsramsSignature Date F. ` 1 l/ l IIcS GS 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 4/13/00 3:23 PA I of i petition 1 file: / / /Cl/My Documents/petition l.html PETITION TO THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL AND BOARD OF EDUCATION We the undersigned do not believe that the Community Center is an appropriate site for a three - gymnasium fieldhouse and request that the City Council and School Board select another site. Name (print) Address Schools/ProgramsSignature Date / � S/0 6) 2. 3. -� C_0 CA Kam, G- J C H 2- Zp i J .mss � 2.� c i�� 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9 of 1 4/13/00 3:23 PM a petition 1 file: / / /Cl/My Documents /petition l.html PETITION TO THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL AND BOARD OF EDUCATION We the undersigned do not believe that the Community Center is an appropriate site for a three - gymnasium fieldhouse and request that the City Council and School Board select another site. Name (print) Address Schools/Pro rg amsSignature Date 1. K"wow f ()p,� 4 limit le— WSW &C" Al 2. tlac QxA_ Cr Mc °�Unr Q, McGC emAIEw 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 1 of 1 4/13/00 3:23 PM petition 1 file: / / /Cl/My Documents /petition l .html PETITION TO THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL AND BOARD OF EDUCATION We the undersigned do not believe that the Community Center is an appropriate site for a three- gymnasium fieldhouse and request that the City Council and School Board select another site. Name (print) Address Schools/ProQramsSi ng ature Date 5609 _SAxt ssoj " �_(009 chaAL Z `l' 6- - - u 3. 4. 5. 6. .7. 8. 9. 4/13/00 3:23 PTV petition 1 file: / / /Cl/My Documents/petition l.html PETITION TO THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL AND BOARD OF EDUCATION We the undersigned do not believe that the Community Center is an appropriate site for a three - gymnasium fieldhouse and request that the City Council and School Board select another site. Name (print) Address Schools/Pro rg amsSignature Date . I. LYNN TON�f� • 4�I8 w� 44'TH S['p:t -E.T- u.� t.1 • ss4�4 o nry FriFNaN i ti 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7 8 4/13/00 3:23 Plv petition I file:///Cl/My Documents/petition I.html PETITION TO THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL AND BOARD OF EDUCATION We the undersigned do not believe that the Community Center is an appropriate site for a three-gymnasium fieldhouse and request that the City Council and School Board select another site. Name (print) Address Schools/ProgramsSignature Date 1(%o-' k i _1��4jt 2. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 0 VWX 4/13/00 3:23 PIS petition 1 file: / / /Cj/My Documents/petition Lhtml PETITION TO THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL AND BOARD OF EDUCATION We the undersigned do not believe that the Community Center is an appropriate site for a three - gymnasium fieldhouse and request that the City Council and School Board select another site. Name (print) Address Schools/ProgamsSignature Date 1. �Gc Vl2 TT A Gt ICS y15 'a LfM0 U_) o o dd *JQL / F t Jl 5 S L(;:).4 ci f �yadev@ �lorYvlctM�ake. .1 -�,,' adl�@ �/i ect� �. CGx,iL�% �l "/6-00 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 1 of 1 4/13/00 3:23 PM petition I A'� w file:///Cl/My Documents/petition I.html PETITION TO THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL AND BOARD OF EDUCATION We the undersigned do not believe that the Community Center is an appropriate site for a three- gymnasium fieldhouse and request that the City Council and School Board select another site. Name (print) Address Schools/Pro rg_amsSignature Date 3 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9 4/13/00 10:24 PM 1 of 1 petition 1 file:///Cl/My Documents /petition l.html • PETITION TO THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL AND BOARD OF EDUCATION s, 3 We the undersigned do not believe that the Community Center is an appropriate site for a three - gymnasium fieldhouse and request that the City Council and School Board select another site. Name (print) Address Schools/ProgramsSignature Date 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. I of 1 4/13/00 10:24 PM petition 1 lofl file: / / /Cl/My Documents /petition Lhtml PETITION TO THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL AND BOARD OF EDUCATION We the undersigned do not believe that the Community Center is an appropriate site for a three - gymnasium fieldhouse and request that the City Council and School Board select another site. Name (print) Address Schools/ProgramsSignature Date 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 4/13/00 10:24 PM petition 1 file: / / /Cl/My Documents/petition I.html PETITION TO THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL AND BOARD OF EDUCATION We the undersigned do not believe that the Community Center is an appropriate site for a three - gymnasium fieldhouse and request that the City Council and School Board select another site. Name (print) Address Schools/Pro rg amsSignature Date 1. 3. 4. • 5. 6. 7. E I of 1 4/13/00 3:23 PM petition 1 i fi file: / / /Cj/My Documents /petition l.html PETITION TO THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL AND BOARD OF EDUCATION We the undersigned do not believe that the Community Center is an appropriate site for a three - gymnasium fieldhouse and request that the City Council and School Board select another site. Name (print) Address Schools/ProgramsSignature Date to Mlo l f Av l"& �— o I A a n _ . /n LJn nIf Ajw 41,1 P, G 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. a 4/13/00 3:23 Pb petition 1 file: / / /Cl/My Documents/petition Lhtml PETITION TO THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL AND BOARD OF EDUCATION We the undersigned do not believe that the Community Center is an appropriate site for a three - gymnasium fieldhouse and request that the City Council and School Board select another site. Name (print) Address Schools/Pro rgraalnsSigtnature Date 2. 2f CVVMV--,%., -w 9 snmw 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 4/13/00 3:23 PM 1 nF 1 MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY HELD AT EDINA CITY HALL MAY 2, 2000 - 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, and Chair Maetzold. CONSENT AGENDA APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Johnson and seconded by Commissioner Hovland approving the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Agreement as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FOR APRIL18. 2000, APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Johnson and seconded by Commissioner Hovland approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority for April 18, 2000. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. CLAIMS PAID Motion made by Commissioner Register dated April 26, 2000, and consisting of Commissioner Hovland seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold Motion carried. Faust approving the Check one page totaling $4,894.15. There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, Chair Maetzold declared the HRA meeting adjourned. Executive Director o1i Le 0 \NCR es REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: BRA AND COUNCIL From: GORDON L. HUGHES CITY MANAGER Date: MAY 16, 2000 Subject: GRANDVIEW SQUARE DEVELOPMENT and PRELIMINARY REZONING AND OVERALL DEVELOP- MENT PLAN - OPUS CLARK RECOMMENDATION: Agenda Item Consent Information Only Mgr. Recommends • Adopt Preliminary Rezoning & Overall Development Plan. • Review the key terms of the Redevelopment Agreement. • Approve Assignment of purchase agreement - 5201 Eden Circle. • Approve indemnification agreement and condemnation resolutions. • Approve land exchange agreement with Hennepin County. INFO/BACKGROUND: HRA II, A,B,C,D,E & II.A. ® To HRA ® To Council ® Motion ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance ® Discussion Last December the Council approved a letter of intent with Opus /Clark to develop the Kunz/Lewis property and adjacent properties. Their concept was named Grandview Square. The developers are now asking the City & HRA to approve various actions as part of the development process. Six actions are to be considered on Tuesday: PRELIMINARY REZONING AND OVERALL DEVELOPMENT PLAN - Mr. Larsen has a separate report under II.A. of the City Council agenda which describes the site plan and planning commission report for the preliminary rezoning action. Please refer to his report and recommendation for that information. Mr. Larsen and the developers will make presentations regarding the current site plan being proposed. Staff and Planning Commission are recommending preliminary zoning approval for the development. REPORT/RECOMMENDATION - GRANDVIEW SQUARE DEVELOPMENT May.16, 2000 Page two INITIAL REVIEW OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT - Phil Boelter of Dorsey & Whitney has attached an executive summary of the redevelopment agreement. Since staff and the developers are still negotiating portions of the agreement, we felt we should provide you with an executive summary of the main terms of the agreement. We are not asking for any action Tuesday night. Under the current schedule, the final redevelopment agreement would be approved on the June 20th Council meeting. ASSIGNMENT OF THE PURCHASE AGREEMENT - 5201 EDEN CIRCLE - Mr. Boelter has attached a statement of purpose regarding the assignment of the agreement to the HRA. By approving this assignment, the HRA would accept the terms of the purchase agreement negotiated by Opus /Clark on a contingent free basis. If the Grandview Square development did not occur, the HRA would have ownership of the property. In review of the development proposals last fall, Council felt the minimum site area needed for development was the Kunz/Lewis property and 5201 Eden Circle. Based on the existing tax increment district (without the Opus /Clark development), there is enough increment generated by the rest of the district to afford the price of this property. At this time, the developers have not reached an agreement with the TAGS, who is one of the tenants in the building. Agreements have been reached with the owner of the building and the remaining tenants. Steve Brown of Grubb & Ellis has been representing the developers on negotiating the acquisition of the existing properties. Mr. Brown has attached a letter describing the negotiations that have occurred with TAGS. He will be available for questions regarding this process. Mr. Boelter will be able to describe the process of condemnation of the TAGS lease, if the developers are not able to reach an agreement with TAGS. INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT AND CONDEMNATION RESOLUTION - Jerry Gilligan has attached the indemnification agreement, an executive summary of the condemnation resolution and the condemnation resolution. The condemnation resolution includes all four properties to be acquired for the development. This includes the 5201 Eden Circle property since the condemnation will entitle them to favorable tax treatment. To date, Opus /Clark has not been able to reach agreements with the other property owners and is asking that the HRA pass the condemnation resolution in order to proceed with the development. Mr. Brown has attached a letter providing an overview of the negotiations process with each property owner. LAND EXCHANGE WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY - Mr. Boelter has included an executive summary of the agreement. This agreement allows the HRA to exchange the existing library property for the proposed library property on the site plan. The agreement would be contingent on approval of the plans and specifications by the County Board. The County Board will not consider the land exchange agreement until the HRA i REPORT RECOMMENDATION /GRANDVIEW SQUARE DEVELOPMENT May 16, 2000 Page three 0 approves it first. It is approximately five week process to get on the County Board Agenda from the time the HRA approves the land exchange. Assuming these items get approved on Tuesday, the schedule for other action pertaining to Grandview Square would be as follows: V Call for Sale of Bonds - Sr. Center/Library & Refunding of 1997 bonds June 6 Final Rezoning and Site Plan Approval June 20 Preliminary and Final Plat Approval June 20 Final Redevelopment Agreement Approval June 20 Sale of Bonds week of July 10th Agenda Item:HRA.II.A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF REDEVELOPMENT CONTRACT FOR EDEN AVENUE REDEVELOPMENT Project. The Eden Avenue Redevelopment Project (the "Project ") as proposed will consist of 172 residential units (the "Residential Units "), approximately 88,000 square feet of rentable office space (the "Office Building "), an approximately 20,000 square foot library (the "Library"), an approximately 20,000 square foot senior center (the "Senior Center ") and various on -site and off -site improvements such as public and private streets and driveways, parking, drainage, utilities, landscaping and a visual buffer ( "Visual Buffer ") between the Redevelopment Property and the school bus garage. 2. Redevelopment Property. The Project area (collectively the "Redevelopment Property") consists of (a) property currently owned by the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority ( "HRA ") and commonly referred to as the Kunz Oil property and the Lewis Engineering property (collectively the "Kunz/Lewis Parcel'), (b) the TAGS building at 5201 Eden Circle, (c) the Noonan building located at 5244 Eden Circle, (d) the Edina Pet Hospital building located at 5237 Eden Avenue, (e) the Classic Hair Design building located at 5241 Eden Avenue and (f) a portion of Sherwood Park. Redeveloper. Opus Northwest, L.L.C. ( "Opus ") and R.E.C. Inc. doing business as Ron Clark Construction ( "Clark ") will form Grandview Square, L.L.C. ( "Grandview "). Grandview will be responsible for land development. It is expected that Grandview will convey the office building site to Opus and that Opus will construct the Office Building and that Grandview will convey the residential site(s) to Clark and that Clark will construct the Residential Units. Contingencies. The Redevelopment Contract does not contain any contingencies. Neither party, however, will sign the Redevelopment Contract until the following have been satisfied or waived: (a) There must be no adverse changes in Minnesota law that would prohibit the HRA from using tax increment revenue from the Grandview Tax Increment Financing District (the "TIF District ") to pay (i) all existing debt previously incurred which is payable from tax increment received from the TIF District, (ii) all new debt issued by the City, or HRA with respect to public improvements associated with the Project, and (iii) the administrative costs of the City and the HRA related to the TIF District. (b) Grandview must have obtained, without cost to the HRA or the City, and found satisfactory, all environmental and geotechnical reports, tests, investigations and surveys deemed necessary by Grandview or the HRA for those portions of the Redevelopment Property to be acquired by Grandview. Grandview must have obtained, without cost to the HRA or the City, and made available to the HRA, all environmental and geotechnical reports, investigations and surveys for the Pet Hospital Parcel, the Classic Hair Parcel, that portion of the Kunz/Lewis Parcel to become part of the Library/Senior Center Site, the TAGS Parcel and any other parcels to be acquired by the HRA, and the HRA or the City must have obtained such reports, investigations and surveys for the property located at 4701 West 50th Street in Edina, Minnesota upon which is currently located the Edina Public Library, and all such reports, investigations and surveys must be found satisfactory by the HRA in its sole discretion. (c) All environmental and geotechnical reports, tests, investigations and surveys deemed necessary by Grandview for the Kunz/Lewis Parcel must be found satisfactory by Grandview in its sole discretion. (d) The City, the HRA and Grandview must have obtained all necessary approvals for the Project from the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. (e) The City must have granted all re- zoning and'all necessary approvals of the Project Plan. (f) Grandview and the HRA must have agreed upon, and the HRA must have obtained all necessary approvals to construct on the Eden Avenue right -of -way, at the HRA's expense, the Visual Buffer. (g) Grandview and the HRA must have agreed upon the final form of a Storm Water Drainage Agreement. (h) Grandview and the HRA must have agreed upon the final form of Parking Agreement allowing public use of the Office Building parking lot during non - business hours. (i) There must be no adverse changes in Minnesota law that would prohibit the HRA from using tax increment revenue from the TIF District to pay the TIF Revenue Bonds and the Note referred to below in Section 8. 5. Acquisition of Parcels; Eminent Domain. Grandview will attempt to acquire fee title to the TAGS Parcel, the Noonan Parcel, the Pet Hospital Parcel and the Classic Hair Parcel from their respective owners. If Grandview is unsuccessful in its attempt to acquire fee title to, or any other right, title, interest or estate necessary in order to construct the Office Building, the Residential Units and all related site improvements in, any such Parcels, then the HRA, to the extent permitted by law, will acquire any of the Parcels that Grandview is not able to acquire. Grandview will pay all of the HRH's Acquisition Costs and will relocate all public utilities or services and pay all costs and expenses of such relocation. Opus and Clark will jointly and severally guaranty the full payment of all Acquisition Costs and the $3,700,000 equity contribution. 6. Construction of Minimum Improvements. Grandview, Opus or Clark will construct or cause to be constructed the Office Building, at least 40 Residential Units and related improvements (the "Minimum Improvements ") pursuant to construction drawings, specifications and related documents approved by the HRA. 7. Sale of Library/Senior Center Site. In the event for any reason the HRA elects not to develop and construct the Library and Senior Center after the acquisition of the Library/Senior Center Site, Grandview, Opus or Clark will acquire the HRA's title to the Library/Senior Center Site, for a purchase price to be agreed upon and set forth in the Redevelopment Contract. Reimbursement of Public Redevelopment Costs; General Description. The HRA will provide to Grandview an amount of public assistance equal to the Public Redevelopment Costs incurred by Grandview up to the maximum amount of $7,900,000. A portion of such public assistance will be paid from .proceeds of TIF Revenue Bonds and the remaining amounts not paid from the TIF Revenue Bonds will be payable to the Grandview pursuant to a "pay -as- you -go" note (the "Note ") to be issued by the HRA to reimburse Grandview for Public Redevelopment Costs paid by the Grandview from other than proceeds of the TIF Revenue Bonds. The TIF Revenue Bonds and Note will be issued by the HRA up to a maximum principal balance of $7,900,000.00 and will bear interest on the unpaid principal balance thereof at a rate equal to nine percent (9.0 %) per annum. Payment of principal and of interest on the TIF Revenue Bonds and Note shall be solely from Available Tax Increment as provided in the TIF Revenue Bonds and Note and shall be expressly subject to and subordinate to the obligation of the City and the HRA to pay Senior Obligations when due. In no event shall the TIF Revenue Bonds or Note be payable from Additional Tax Increment. Grandview Equity Contribution; Debt Payoff. On or before November 30, 2001, Grandview will pay the HRA the sum of Three Million Seven Hundred,Thousand and no /100ths Dollars ($3,700,000.00) as and for Grandview's equity contribution to the Project. In exchange for this Agreement to make this equity contribution, the HRA will quitclaim fee title to the Sherwood Park Parcel and a portion of the Kunz/Lewis Parcel to Grandview. Immediately upon receipt of Grandview's equity contribution, the HRA will pay in full the General Obligation Temporary Tax Increment Bonds Series 1997B, including any bonds or obligations issued to refund such bonds. As consideration for the HRA agreeing to the payment of the equity contribution as provided above and to the provisions of Article IV hereof, Grandview will pay to the HRA simultaneously with its execution of this Agreement the sum of One Hundred Thousand Seventy-five and no /100ths Dollars ($175,000.00). 10. Additional Definitions. Acquisition Costs - means (i) the cost of appraisals to establish the "fair market value" of the Redevelopment Property (exclusive of the Kunz/Lewis Parcel and the Sherwood Park Parcel); (ii) the amounts paid by the HRA to outside legal counsel (in accordance with the hourly rate schedule generally applicable to HRA and City matters) retained to draft, develop and file the petition for and handle the eminent domain proceedings on behalf of the HRA and Grandview and to transfer the Redevelopment Property to Grandview pursuant to and in accordance with the Redevelopment Contract; (iii) all court and filing fees; (iv) all witness fees; (v) all recording costs; (vi) payment of all relocation benefits which the owner and tenants of the Redevelopment Property (exclusive of the Kunz/Lewis Parcel and the Sherwood Park Parcel) are entitled to receive pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 117.52 et. seq. and associated regulations; (vii) payment of all deposits required to be made with Hennepin County as a result of any immediate transfer of title ( "quick take ") pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 117.042 of any portion of the Redevelopment Property; (viii) all awards granted in any condemnation action for the Redevelopment Property reduced by the amount of any deposits described in the foregoing subparagraph (vii) applied against such awards; (ix) all costs of environmental and geotechnical reports, tests, investigations and surveys for the Redevelopment Property; (x) all costs of platting and zoning the Redevelopment Property as required by this Agreement; (xi) all state deed tax payable in connection with any deeds to the Redevelopment Property which are required pursuant to and in accordance with this Agreement; (xii) the cost of obtaining title insurance commitments for the Redevelopment Property (exclusive of the Kunz/Lewis Parcel and the Sherwood Park Parcel) and any fees or charges due to any title insurance company for the same; and (xiii) all other costs incurred in connection with acquisition of marketable fee title to the Redevelopment Property (exclusive of the Kunz/Lewis Parcel and the Sherwood Park Parcel), including without limitation all mailing, publication and related costs. Additional Tax Increment - means Tax Increment which is attributable to improvements in the TIF District, other than the Redevelopment Property, the construction of which is commenced after January 1, 2000. Administrative Costs - means administrative costs of the HRA and the City related to the TIF District, including but not limited to staff, legal and consulting costs and costs related to the issuance and administration of debt obligations payable from Tax Increment, except any administrative costs included as a part of Acquisition Costs. Available Tax Increment - means Project Tax Increment until the Phase,I Completion Date and, subsequent to the Phase I Completion Date, Available Tax Increment shall mean Tax Increment other than any Additional Tax Increment. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Available Tax Increment includes all Tax Increment attributable to real estate taxes payable in calendar year 2000, and, if Grandview completes all Minimum Improvements on or before December 31, 2001 pursuant to the requirements of the Redevelopment Contract, that portion of the first installment of Tax Increment attributable to real estate taxes payable in calendar year 2001, if any, remaining after payment of the Senior Obligations. For purposes of the immediately preceding sentence, (i) the Office Building shall be deemed completed when Grandview, Opus or Clark receives from the City a shell certificate of completion for such Office Building, which shell certificate of completion shall be issued even though leasehold improvements may not be completed, and (ii) Residential Phase I shall be deemed completed when each of the Residential Units that are a part of Residential Phase I and the building or buildings in which such Residential Units are located are complete in all material respects except for interior painting and staining, kitchen appliances, cabinetry and millwork, floor coverings, plumbing fixtures, countertops and closet finishes. Phase I Completion Date - means the date on which the Certificate of Completion is issued for the Minimum Improvements pursuant to the Redevelopment Contract. Project Bonds - means general obligation bonds issued by the City to finance in part the construction of the Library and the Senior Center, together with parking, landscaping and other related site improvements, and necessary public improvements located outside the Project Area. The term "Project Bonds" shall also include any bonds or obligations issued to refund any Project Bonds. Project Tax Increment - means Tax Increment derived from the Redevelopment Property. Public Redevelopment Costs - means costs incurred for: (a) improvements to the Sherwood Park Parcel; (b) reimbursement to Grandview of any Acquisition Costs paid to unrelated third parties by Grandview for the Redevelopment Property other than the Library/Senior Center Site; (c) demolition and site development costs (to be defined); and (d) construction of parking for the Office Building. Residential Phase I - means the first 40 Residential Units and all related site improvements as required by the City to be constructed by Grandview on a portion of the Redevelopment Property. Senior Obligations - means (i) the Existing Obligations, (ii) up to $4,000,000 of principal, together with interest thereon, of Project Bonds; and (iii) Administrative Costs, other than Administrative Costs incurred in connection with or related to the Project and paid from the proceeds of the Project Bonds, up to a maximum amount in any year of two percent (2 %) of Tax Increment received by the HRA. Tax Increment - means tax increment, as defined in Minn. Stat., §469.174, subd. 25, which is received by the HRA with respect to the TIF District and which is not required by law to be paid by the HRA to any other taxing jurisdictions. 4 Agenda Item:HRA.II.B. PROPOSED ASSIGNMENT OF PURCHASE AGREEMENT TO HRA For a number of reasons, Grandview Square L.L.C. would like to enter into a purchase agreement with the owner of the TAGS Parcel prior to the execution of the Redevelopment Contract. If for any reason Grandview does not execute the Redevelopment Contract, Grandview has requested the HRA to either (1) take an assignment of the purchase agreement if Grandview has not acquired fee title to the TAGS Parcel and assume all of Grandview's rights and obligations under the purchase agreement, or (2) acquire the fee title to the TAGS Parcel from Grandview for the same purchase price that Grandview paid for the TAGS Parcel. The purchase agreement does not contain any contingencies. Grandview has said it will not enter into the purchase agreement until the HRA and Grandview have executed and delivered an Assignment of Purchase Agreement and Conveyancing Agreement containing the agreement of the parties to the matters outlined above. AGENDA ITEM:. 11RA II.B. GrubbrEllis® Property Solutions Worldwide May 8, 2000 Mr. Gordon Hughes City of Edina 4801 West 50`x' Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 Re: Grandview Square Redevelopment Project Dear Gordon: As you know, Opus Northwest L.L.C. and Ron Clark Construction have retained me to negotiate the private acquisition of properties needed for the Grandview redevelopment project. One of the tenants that is part of this acquisition project is TAGS. TAGS is currently located in the 5201 Eden Circle building. As part of the acquisition process for this building, I have had several conversations with both Julia and Greg Aretz, as well as Russ Crawford of Equity Commercial Services. Russ was hired by TAGS to represent them in finding a new location when this development occurs. Because TAGS has indicated that they would like to remain in Edina, I have forwarded options to Russ that I have come across that I believe may suit TAGS needs. I am enclosing a copy of my most recent correspondence with Russ for your review. It includes 10 options. One of the better options I was able to locate is at 7103 Amundson Avenue. I originally discussed this building with Russ back in February, however is also included again in the attached information which I recently, sent to Russ. My understanding is that they did not like it for some reason. However, it is core Edina, has great parking, excellent visibility and good access. I am assuming from my conversations with him that Julia and Greg Aretz have him actively engaged in a search for new space for TAGS. Since TAGS has retained Equity Commercial to help them find space, my ability to assist them is limited to adjunct support. I have forwarded information I felt was pertinent in the process. I felt it important to inform you that we have been both supportive of TAGS objectives, as well as willing to assist them where we see it appropriate based upon the exclusive working relationship they have established with Russ Crawford. Please call if you have any questions. Grubb & Ellis AcTvisory Services Grubb & Ellis Company 5850 Opus Parkway Suite 150 Minnetonka, MN 55343 612.912.8500 612.912.8585 +ext. 612.912.0123, fax I 1 = GrubbaEllisa ' Property Solutions Worldwide May 4, 2000 Mr. Russ Crawford Equity Commercial Services 7360 Second Avenue South 400 Peavey Building Minneapolis, MN 55402 Re: TAGS Relocation Dear Russ: Greetings! I hope all is well and -that you are enjoying this great spring weather. I am writing as a follow up to our most recent conversation regarding TAGS relocation to a new facility. I have had the chance to do some additional research in the Southwest market with an emphasis on Edina-. I thought I would forward some of my findings in case they might be helpful for your work with TAGS. As TAGS representative, I am certain that you have already researched all of these options but I thought I would send them just in case. As a matter of specific interest, I know that the building off 70'h and Cahill has 20,000 sf, is 18' clear and has land area for excellent parking. I am continuing to keep my eyes peeled for potential alternatives. I hope that your search is going well. Based upon the anticipated timing I discussed with Greg and Julia and our most recent discussion on the phone, I assume that your search is -in full swing and that you are moving ahead full speed to find alternatives for TAGS . If I can be help in anyway in this endeavor. please don't hesitate to give me 'a call. Take care Rusty! SincerelAideknt IM Grubb & Ellis Advisory Services cc: Jim Holmes Tom Lund Heidi Kurtze Grubb & Ellis Company 5850 Opus parkway Suite 150 Minnetonka, MN 55343 612.912.8500 612.912.8585 +ext. 612.912.0123. fax Property Size: 71,730 Large Block: 12,197 tes High: ,.65 Rate Type: Net Taxes: $1.64 Current Status: For Lease Asking Price: Type - Class: IN - Office/Warehouse Multiple /Single: Multiple Tenant Year Built/Renovated: 1974/ Docks: Drive -Ins: East Eden II 7450 - 7584 Washington Ave S Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Click Here For Map, Total Available: 22,197 Small Block: 3,519 Rates Low: $4.50 Total Tax/Operating: $2.62 Operating Expense: $0.98 Date Available: 8/1/94 Sale Terms: Clear Height: 18' Column Spacing: 30 Heat Type: Gas Lighting Type: Fluorescent AC Type: Office ADA Comp: N Air Cond: N Basement: N BTS: N Bulk: N Cafe: N Cold Storage: N Conf Room: N Cranes: N Elevator: N Fiber Optics: N Zoning: Lgt Industrial Bldg Dimension: Lot Dimension: 610 X 400 Land Size: 243,936 SF Street Frontage: omments low any 'time. East Eden II 7450 - 7584 Washington Ave S Eden Prairie, MN 55344 PAGE 2 Fir Drains: N Full Assd: N Hi -Tech: N Landscp: N Light Mfg: N Nat Gas: N OS Mgmt: N Park Charge: N Phase 1 Comp: N Print Shop: N Rail Access: N Amps: 200 Volts: Phase: # Restrooms: 2 Hudson ID: 41 -C1 Rcy Program: N Remodeled: N Restaurant: N Sec Bldg: 14 Sec Grd: N Service Drs: N Sprinkler: Y Storage: N Vending: N Will Divide: Y Surface Parking: Ungrnd Parking: Covered Parking: Total Parking: OCR ID: 20769 wners ip Building Contacts Agency: Steiner Development Inc 3610 County Rd 101 Owner: FIRST INDUSTRIAL L P Contact: Address: 150 N WACKER DR CHICAGO, IL 60606 Wayzata, MN 55391 (952) 473 -5650 (Phone) (312) 984 -3100 (952) 473-7058 (Fax) _..._....__..._._._._.._...._._. ._.__._..__....._......-- _. -.._ Taxpayer: FIRST INDUSTRIAL L P Contacts: Joe Smith Contact: (952) 475 -5122 N Address: 7615 CEDE�ON PRRAIRIEjMMNG55344- -3733 Pry Own: THE EQUITABLE LIFE ASSURANCES Mgmt: Steiner Development c Address: 455 N CITYFRONT PLAZA DR Contact: CJ Lyngen 473 CHICAGO, IL 60611 (952) -5650 (312) 527 -5000 List Type: Exclusive Right to Sell/Lease peci is acancies ota ® se �" "6� ec et ezz �� r� V�� ©E "_JL Anc or enants onstruchon usin ar 1 1p ax andWalue Information Last Sale Date: Lot: ; Coun PID: Bldg Assd Value: 12 116 22 410002 $1,663,000 12/31/96 Tax Year: Land Assd Value: Sale Price: Block: $2,550,000 1998 $537,000 Yearly Tax: Total Assd Value: Last Updated: Subdivision: 04/14/00 UNPLATTED 12 116 22 $127,399 $2,200,000 Legal Description: t~ All FT OF s 1/2 OF NE 1/4 OF SE 1/4 EX ROADS Copyright® 2000 Organization of Commercial REALTORS& Information deemed reliable but not guaranteed. The OCR does not assume responsibility for accuracy of such information. VA Property Size: 153,566 Large Block: ^0,750 es High: .50 Rate Type: Net Taxes: $2.89 Current Status: Off Market Asking Price: Type - Class: IN - Office/Warehouse Multiple /Single: Multiple Tenant Year Built/Renovated: 1995/ Docks: 12 Drive -Ins: 5 Golden Triangle Business Center 9625 - 9675 W 76th St Eden Prairie, MN 55344 C1ck.Here For Map Q Total Available: 29,750 Small Block: 11,570 Rates Low: $4.75 Total Tax/Operating: $3.70 Operating Expense: $1.12 Date Available: Sale Terms: Clear Height: 18' Column Spacing: Heat Type: Lighting Type: AC Type: ice newer ADA Comp: N Air Cond: Y Basement: N BTS: N Bulk: N Cafe: N Cold Storage: N Conf Room: N Cranes: N Elevator: N Fiber Optics: N Zoning: Bldg Dimension: Lot Dimension: IRREGULAR Land Size: 12,064,832 SF Street Frontage: Flr Drains: N Full Assd: N Hi -Tech: N Landscp: N Light Mfg: N Nat Gas: N OS Mgmt: N Park Charge: N Phase 1 Comp: N Print Shop: N Rail Access: N Rcy Program: N Remodeled: N Restaurant: N Sec Bldg: N Sec Grd: N Service Drs: N Sprinkler: N Storage: N Vending: N Will Divide: Y Amps: Surface Parking: 200 Volts: Ungrnd Parking: Phase: Covered Parking: # Restrooms: Total Parking: Hudson ID: OCR ID: 20754 Golden Triangle Business Center 9625 - 9675 W 76th St Eden Prairie, MN 55344 PAGE 2 C' Owner: CSM INVESTORS INC Contact: Address: Taxpayer: CSM INVESTORS INC Contact: Address: 2575 UNIVERSITY AVE W STE 150 ST PAUL, MN 55114-1069 ...... .... . ............ ......... . .... . ... Pry Own: Address: Agency: CSM Corporation 2575 University Ave W #150 St Paul, MN 55114 (651) 646-1717 (Phone) (651) 646-2404 (Fax) Contacts: Bruce Carland (651) 646-1717 Mgmt: CSM Corporation Contact: Jonathan Distad List Type: ,andes en ess rmation Lot: I Block: 1 Subdivision: GOLDEN TRIANGLE BUSINESS CENTE CopyrightC 2000 Organization of Commercial REALTORM information deemed reliable but not guaranteed. The OCR does not assume responsibility for accuracy of such information. Tax and Value County PED: Bldg Assd Value: List Sale Date: 12 116 22 44 0005 $6,482,000 . Tax Year: Land Assd Value: Sale Price: 1998 $1,218,000 Yearly Tax: Total Assd Value: Last Updated: 04/13/00 $451,824 $7,700,000 Legal Description: ess rmation Lot: I Block: 1 Subdivision: GOLDEN TRIANGLE BUSINESS CENTE CopyrightC 2000 Organization of Commercial REALTORM information deemed reliable but not guaranteed. The OCR does not assume responsibility for accuracy of such information. v Property Size: 30,000 Large Block: 14,583 tes High: ,.00 Rate Type: NNN Taxes: Current Status: For Lease Asking Price: Type - Class: IN - Office/Warehouse Multiple /Single: Multiple Tenant Year Built/Renovated: 1969/ Docks: 6 Drive -Ins: 4 Amundson Building 7103 Amundson Ave S Edina, MN 55439 -2019 Click Here For Map Total Available: 14,583 Small Block: 5,208 Rates Low: $4.00 Total Tax/Operating: Operating Expense: $2.31 Date Available: Sale Terms: Clear Height: 18' Column Spacing: Heat Type: Lighting Type: AC Type: ADA Comp: Y Air Cond: Y Basement: N BTS: N Bulk: N Cafe: N Cold Storage: N Conf Room: N Cranes: N Elevator: N Fiber Optics: N Zoning: Industrial Bldg Dimension: Lot Dimension: IRREGULAR Land Size: Street Frontage: tenant Amundson Building 7103 Amundson Ave S Edina, MN 55439 -2019 PAGE 2 Flr Drains: Y Full Assd: N Hi -Tech: N Landscp: N Light Mfg: Y Nat Gas: Y OS Mgmt: N Park Charge: N Phase 1 Comp: N Print Shop: N Rail Access: N Rcy Program: N Remodeled: Y Restaurant: N Sec Bldg: N Sec Grd: N Service Drs: N Sprinkler: N Storage: N Vending: Y Will Divide: Y Amps: Surface Parking: Volts: Ungrnd Parking: Phase: Covered Parking: # Restrooms: Total Parking: Hudson ID: OCR ID: 37035 Owner: Contact: Address: Taxpayer: Contact: Address: Pry Own: Address: V W MELIN ET AL 3309 CRYSTAL BAY RD ORONO, MN 55391 612 -474 -8463 V WILLIAM MELIN 3309 CRYSTAL BAY RD WAYZATA, MN 55391 -9205 ----------- -- - ------------- - -....- YOUNGBERG KENNETH A 6700 PENN AVE S RICHFIELD, MN 55423 612- 866 -6819 Agency: SSI Realty Services 1313 5th St SE #126E Minneapolis, MN 55414 (612) 379 -3928 (Phone) (612) 379 -3927 (Fax) Contacts: David Gimberline (952) 939 -9749 Barry Bosold, CPM,RPA (612) 379 -3928 Mgmt: Contact: List Type: Exclusive Right to Sell/Lease ess Lot: Block: Subdivision: REG. LAND SURVEY NO. 1193 Copyright® 2000 Organization of Commercial REALTORS& Information deemed reliable but not guaranteed. The OCR does not assume responsibility for accuracy of such information. 'rax ana v ame iniv County PID: Bldg Assd Value: 1 asst Sale Date: 08 116 21 110020 $359,200 Tax Year: Assd Value: Sale Price: $1,150,000 1999 - .. $177,400 Yearly Tax:, Total Assd Value: Last Updated: $25,790 $536,600 03/28/00 Legal Description: THAT PART OF TRACT A LYING S OF N 5165/100 FT THOF ess Lot: Block: Subdivision: REG. LAND SURVEY NO. 1193 Copyright® 2000 Organization of Commercial REALTORS& Information deemed reliable but not guaranteed. The OCR does not assume responsibility for accuracy of such information. Property Size: 61,201 Large Block: 17,059 tes High: .50 Rate Type: Net Taxes: Current Status: For Lease Asking Price: Type - Class: IN - Office/Warehouse Multiple /Single: Multiple Tenant Year Built/Renovated: 1968/ Docks: Drive -Ins: Edina 5 - Sublease 7557 Washington Ave S Edina, MN 55439 Click Here For Map Notes Total Available: 17,059 Small Block: 17,059 Rates Low: $3.75 Total Tax/Operating: $2.50 Operating Expense: Date Available: 7/1/00 Sale Terms: Clear Height: 18' Column Spacing: Heat Type: Lighting Type: AC Type: run ou anuary 0 1. ADA Comp: N Air Cond: Y Basement: N BTS: N Bulk: N Cafe: N Cold Storage: N Conf Room: N Cranes: N Elevator: N Fiber Optics: N Zoning: Industrial Bldg Dimension: Lot Dimension: Land Size: Street Frontage: Edina 5 - Sublease 7557 Washington Ave S Edina, MN 55439 PAGE 2 Flr Drains: N Full Assd: N Hi -Tech: N Landscp: N Light Mfg: N Nat Gas: N OS Mgmt: N Park Charge: N Phase 1 Comp: N Print Shop: N Rail Access: N Rcy Program: N Remodeled: N Restaurant: N Sec Bldg: N Sec Grd: N Service Drs: N Sprinkler: Y Storage: N Vending: N Will Divide: N Amps: Surface Parking: Volts: Ungrnd Parking: Phase: Covered Parking: # Restrooms: Total Parking: Hudson ID: OCR ID: 38833 owner would also oe an wners ip Buflalmg Contacts Owner: Agency: Hoyt Properties 708 S 3rd St #108 Contact: Minneapolis, MN 55415 Address: (612) 338-7787 (Phone) (612) 338-7797 (Fax) Contacts: Gary Lally Contactt: : Taxpayer: Contact: (612) 338 -3199 Address: Mgmt: Pry Own: Address: Contact: List Type: Exclusive Right to Sell/Lease c Vacancies pec>< ota ® hse ® ec et ezz II.JI� rive- � Anc or enants onstruchon Business ar ax an a ue Infor mation County PID• Bldg Assd Value: Last Sale Date: Lot: 07 116 2132 0003 Tax Year: Land Assd Value: Sale Price: Block: Yearly Tax: Total Assd Value: Last Updated: Subdivision: 05/03/00 Legal Description: Copyright® 2000 Organization of Commercial REALTORS& Information deemed reliable but not guaranteed. The OCR does not assume responsibility for accuracy of such information. Property Size: 110,000 Large Block: '7,600 .tes High: .16.00 Rate Type: Net Taxes: $1.36 Current Status: For Lease Asking Price: Reuter Manufacturing Building 410 11th Ave S Hopkins, MN 55343 -7844 Click Here For Map vailability ana tcates Total Available: ADA Comp: N Fir Drains: N 31,200 Air Cond: N Full Assd: Y Small Block: Basement: N Hi -Tech: N 3,600 BTS: N Landscp: N Rates Low: Bulk: Y Light Mfg: Y $4.00 Total Tax/Operating: Cafe: N Nat Gas: Y $2.05 Cold Storage: N OS Mgmt: Y Operating Expense: Conf Room: N Park Charge: N Cranes: N Phase 1 Comp: N Date Available: Elevator: N Print Shop: N 1/19/00 Sale Terms: Fiber Optics: N Rail Access: N Type - Class: IN - office/Warehouse Multiple /Single: Single Tenant Year Built/Renovated: 1967/1987 Docks: 2 Drive -Ins: 1 Clear Height: 18' Column Spacing: Heat Type: Gas Lighting Type: AC Type Zoning: Industrial Bldg Dimension: Lot Dimension: E 787X61 IX56IX647 Land Size: Street Frontage: Rcy Program: N Remodeled: N Restaurant: N Sec Bldg: N Sec Grd: N Service Drs: Y Sprinkler: N Storage: Y Vending: N Will Divide: N Amps: Surface Parking: 89 Volts: Ungrnd Parking: Phase: Covered Parking: # Restrooms: Total Parking: 2 Hudson ID: OCR ID: 32 -05 11246 Reuter Manufacturing Building 410 11th Ave S Hopkins, MN 55343 -7844 PAGE 2 Copyrightm 2000 Organization of Commercial REALTORS®. bility for accuracy of such information. Information deemed reliable but.not guaranteed. The OCR does not assume responsi u Ering Contacts wners hip Owner: REUTER INC Agency: Colliers Towle Real Estate 330 2nd Ave S #800 Contact: Minneapolis, MN 55401 • Address: (612) 341 -4444 (Phone) (612) 347 -9389 (Fax) _... .._.__..._ .............._.. - - -- REUTER INC Contacts: Jeff Patterson • Taxpayer• (612) 347 -9324 Contact: Address• 410 11TH AVE S • HOPKINS, MN 55343 -7844 Richard Ragatz (612) 347 -9323 Pry Own: Mgmt: Address: Contact: List Type: Exclusive Right to Sell/Lease peci is acancies ota f F se gt � ec et ezz r oc � rive- 1 Anc or enants IIL � onstruction Business ar ax an a ue n ormahon County PID• Bldg Assd Value: Last Sale Date: Lot: 2 21 0005 $1,598,100 Land Assd Value: Sale Price: Block: Year: $932,600 Tax: Total Assd Value: Last Updated: AUDITOR'S SUED. NO. 195 05/04/00 9 $2,530,700 escription: DJ VAC 3 1/2 ST SUBJECT TO ROAD . Copyrightm 2000 Organization of Commercial REALTORS®. bility for accuracy of such information. Information deemed reliable but.not guaranteed. The OCR does not assume responsi f f t y Jr. v v d. 0504/00 13:28 FAX 612 347 9389 TOWLE REAL ESTATE 410 1 I TH AVENUE SOUTH • HOPKINS, MiV ----- • 34,000 sq. ft. of warehouse space - 6,000 sq. ft. of office space (includes many private offices, break room, and conference room;l Outside storage /trailer parking - Heavy power - Excellent visibility and accessibility (1 /2 mile west of Excelsior /Hwy 169 Interchange) - Abundant parking - 2 docks, I oversized drive -in - 18' clear height x - Exceptionally clean space f - Ideal for distribution and /or manufacturing 3 • JEFF PArTERSON 612/347 -9324 RICH FiAGATz 612/347 -9323 !•'Lf� =pry, s•X'.;)!'aet'..'a 7,y. �Sr: COLLIERS TOWLE REAL ESTATE - 330 SECOND AVENUE SOUTH - M114NEAPOLIS, MN 55401 - 612/341 -4444 www.collierstowle.com ` Alnneapolis • C'BD • ... � .•r _ r �•1 � .�`, ^•- --- rte..: r.� ' ._,• ��.•�.s �� - _•i+: �. ••� ...`' -. �..•� ,i ter' ter— - " - a1a1 I: `(�;..•. �. ,.•:..' :1;' — '.r...'7• -;': !'•: .DKfrihUt'IOn.'FaG) F _�: i. �` \OS�''•'' •�.. ,'•�• � Div. � '.•;_ - Renter ` Ma., '` :�•� • '~'� nufa cturing, .�Y •.�- ~:',' ) ..y �� /.:. . - Our= ':�,..;,. •-� ,• ,�. ,.., s COLLIERS TOWLE Braemar IV 6813 - 6843 Washington Ave S Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Click Here For Map Availability an ates Amenities Property Size: Total Available: ADA Comp: N Fir Drains: N Rcy Program: N 26,508 26,508 Air Cond: N Full Assd: N Remodeled: N Large Block: Small Block: Basement: N Hi -Tech: N Restaurant: X '1,267 13,241 BTS: N Landscp: N Sec Bldg: N tes High: Rates Low: Rate Bulk: N Light Mfg: N Sec Grd: N ..50 Rate Type: Total Tax/Operating: Cafe: N Nat Gas: N Service Drs: N Net $3.06 Cold Storage: N OS Mgmt: N Sprinkler: N Taxes: Operating Expense: Conf Room: N Park Charge: N Storage: N $1.91 $1.15 Cranes: N Phase 1 Comp: N Vending: N Current Status: Date Available: Elevator: N Print Shop: N Will Divide: Y For Sale and Lease 12/16/99 Sale Terms: Fiber Optics: N Rail Access: N Asking Price: $1,300,000 —Ge--neral ties Type - Class: Clear Height: Zoning: Amps: Surface Parking: IN - Office/Warehouse Multiple/Single: Column Spacing: Industrial Bldg Dimension: Volts: Ungrnd Parking: Multiple Tenant Year Built/Renovated: Heat Type: Lot Phase: Covered Parking: 1978 / IRREGULAR Parking: i Docks: Lighting Type: Land Size: # Restrooms: Total 13 Drive -Ins: AC Type: Street Frontage: Hudson ID: 076 ID: 12 .omme_ nts I i I Braemar IV 6813 - 6843 Washington Ave S Eden Prairie, MN 55344 PAGE 2 wners ip Building Contacts Owner: A J & S A ZELLER Agency: Welsh 00 Norm�andale Blvd #200 Contact: 6812 ANTRIM RD Address: Bloomington, MN 55437 952 897 -7700 Phone ( ) (Phone) EDINA, MN 55439 (952) 897 -7704 (Fax) Taxpayer: A M B ROSE J & SYLVIA A ZELLER Contacts: Scott T Frederiksen, CCIM,SIOR Contact: Address: ANTRIM RD • (952) 897 -7737 EDINA, MN 55439 -1703 Pry Own: SDMTK INC Address: 10536 MORGAN AVE S M mt: g BLOOMINGTON, MN 55431 Contact: List Type: Vacancies Specific ota SF ff F se F r® Tee et ezz r oc oc Drive-In ©C5�� Anc or Tenants Construct>lon Business Park Tax and Value n ormation Lot: ' County ID: Bldg Assd Value: Last Sale Date: 2 -44 -0009 $746,000 09/23/97 Tax : Land Assd Value: Sale Price: Block: $1,200,000 1 $233,000 ax• Total Assd Value: Last Updated: WASHINGTON PLAZA 04/28/00 $979,000 scription: R 22 LYING N OF A LINE PAR W ITH AND 30 FT N FROM THE WLY EXTENSION OF RT OF LOT 2 IN SEC 1 T 116 E OF LOT 1 Copyright@ 2000 Organization of Commercial REALTORS®. Information deemed reliable but not guaranteed. The OCR does not assume responsibility for accuracy of such information. MAY -04 -00 THU 02:58 PM WELSH COS. INDUSTRIAL FAX NO. Companies Comprehensive Real Estate Services 6200 Normandale Boulevard. Suite 200 Mlnncapulis. Mir+ne,oro 5507 -1060 612.697.7700 Fax 597 7704 For Sale or Lease BRAEMAR IV 6801 -6843 Washington Avenue Eden Prairie, Minnesota Building Square Feet: 26,508 square feet total Available Now:* 5818 Washington Ave. 8,406 square feet of office 4,861 square feet of warehouse 13,267 square feet total * Space is lcased mltil 7131101 but tenant has vocatcd and is interested in to m Available 10/1/00: 6843 Washington Ave. 5,277 square feet of office f house Year Built: Clear Height: Loading: Rental Rate: 2000 Est. CAM /Real Estate Taxes: Sale Price: 7 964 Square feel 0 --I- 13,241 square feet total 1978 14' Docks/Drive -ins $8.50 psf net for office space $4.50 psf net for warehouse space $1.16 psf for CAM . $192 psf for real estate taxes $3.07 psf total CAM/taxes $1,300,000.00 r. uoi i a For snore infonnatiorl colilact: Scott Frederiksen, CCIM, SIOR 612.897.7737 e -mail: sfrederiksen @welshco. corn Information contairrrd heroin has hccn oNairw(I fivni the otunerof Nu property or frna; other sourtt: Mal rue de ern reliable. We I+rwe no rman to doubt its accuracy, but we do ttnt guarantee it. MAY -04 -00 THU 02:59 PH WELSH COOS. INDUSTRIAL FAX NO. ' svtit .,:vas -,1'y<•'� ,.4. ,. -. ..�;r� V. ud /id 10 M—Companies 8200 Noro+andalt Boultvard, Suite 200 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55437 612.897.7700 Pax 697.7704 Braemx IV j 212 ^ T " � A e r e e For further information contact: Scott Frederiksen, CCIM, SIOR 612.897.7737 sfrederiksen@weishco.com Minnetonka Industrial Center 10501 Bren Rd E Minnetonka, MN 55343 -9010 Click Here For Map Avaimlllry ana icatca I Property Size: Total Available: ADA Comp: N Fir Drains: N 13,782 11,683 Air Cond: N Full Assd: N Large Block: Small Block: Basement: N Hi -Tech: N 1,683 1,961 BTS: N Landscp: N ies High: Rates Low: Bulk: N Light Mfg: N i W6.50 Rate Type: $4.50 Total Tax/Operating: Cafe: N Nat Gas: N Net $3.00 Cold Storage: N OS Mgmt: N Taxes: Operating Expense: Conf Room: N Park Charge: N Cranes: N Phase 1 Comp: N Current Status: For Lease Asking Price: Type - Class: IN - Office/Warehouse Multiple /Single: Multiple Tenant Year Built/Renovated: 1978/ Docks: I Drive -Ins: 1 Date Available: 11/2/99 Sale Terms: Clear Height: 16' Column Spacing: Heat Type: Gas /radiant Lighting Type: Elevator: N Fiber Optics: N eral unaracte Zoning: Industrial Bldg Dimension: Lot Dimension: NE126X262X309X253 Land Size: Print Shop: N Rail Access: N Amps: 200 Volts: 208 Phase: 3 # Restrooms: AC Type: Street Frontage: Hudson ID: omments Minnetonka Industrial Center 10501 Bren Rd E Minnetonka, MN 55343 -9010 PAGE 2 Rcy Program: N Remodeled: N Restaurant: N Sec Bldg: N Sec Grd: N Service Drs: N Sprinkler: N Storage: N Vending: N Will Divide: Y Surface Parking: 24 Ungrnd Parking: Covered Parking: Total Parking: OCR ID: 38411 Owner: BRENCON L L C Contact: Address: 10501 BREN RD E Sale Price: MINNETONKA, MN 55343 $697,500 612 - 932 -7148 Taxpayer: Subdivision: Contact: Address: 10501 BREN RD E MINNETONKA, MN 55343 Pry Own: JAMES REVOCABLE TRUST Address: DR' NENNETONKA, MN 55343; 612- 338 -0430 County PID: 36 117 22 34 0012 Tax Year: 1999 Yearly Tax: $19,709 Legal Description: Bldg Assd Value: $284,200 Land Assd Value: $156,800 Total Assd Value: $441,000 Builuing contacts Agency: Welsh Companies LLC 8200 Normandale Blvd #200 Bloomington; MN 55437 (952) 897 -7700 (Phone) (952) 897-7704 (Fax) Contacts: Scott T Frederiksen, CCIM,SIOR (952) 897 -7737 Jeff Jiovanazz0 (952) 897 -7878 Mgmt: Contact: List Type: a enants ess Last Sale Date: Lot: 11/15/99 4 Sale Price: Block: $697,500 11 Last Updated: Subdivision: 04/05/00 OPUS 2 04TH ADDN Copyright® 2000 Organization of Commercial REALTORS& Information deemed reliable but not guaranteed. The OCR does not assume responsibility for accuracy of such information. EM MAY -04 -00 THU 03:01 PM WELSH COS, INDUSTRIAL FAX NO. LMMENCompanies Comprehensive Real-Estate Services 8200 Normandalc Doulcvard, Suitc 200 Minneap01i3, Minnesota 55437 -1060 612.897.7700 Fax 897.7704 For Lease MINNETONKA INDUSTRIAL CENTER 10501 Bren Road East Minnetonka, Minnesota Total Building Size: 13,782 square feet total Square Feet Available: Available: Year Built: Clear Height: Loading: 1,961 square feet of office 9,722 square feet of warehouse 11,683 square feet total Now 1978 16' Dock/Di Rental Rate: $8.50 per square foot of office $4.50 per square foot of warehouse 1999 Est CAM/Real Estate Taxes: $3.00 per square foot For more information contact: Scott Frederiksen, CCIM, SIOR 612.897.7737 e -mail: sfrederiksen @welshco.com Jeff Jiovanazzo 612,897.7878 e -mail: Diovanazoo @welshco.com Lifonaation conlained herein has been oblained from the owner of the properly or from other sources Thal we dean reliable. We have no reason to doubt its accuracy, but we do not guarantee it. -w For Lease 10501 Bien Road East Minnetonka, Minnesota 1 A-; ,r • - : y. wa ry .,feet` .nom... _ •_ A: '1V' . _ . • 13,782 square foot building • Built in 1978 • 16' clear Ceiling height • Docks and drive -ins • Ample parking • Desirable Opus location • Close proximity to numerous restaurants. hotels and slioppin l centers • Access to Highways 169. 212 and Crosstown 62 Welsh p: �4W�t•'i� •� r . .- :5 r Agenda Item: HRA.II.C. INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT THIS INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT ( "Agreement ") is made as of , 2000, by OPUS NORTHWEST, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company ( "Opus "), and R.E.C., INC., a Minnesota corporation doing business as Ron Clark Construction ( "Clark "), in favor of the EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, a public body corporate and politic (the AHRA ") and the CITY OF EDINA, a public body corporate and politic (the "City "). RECITALS: A. The HRA, Opus and Clark, with Opus and Clark forming Grandview, L.L.C. to act as redeveloper, intend to enter into a contract for private redevelopment (the "Redevelopment Contract ") for the property consisting of parcels currently owned by the HRA along Eden Avenue and commonly referred to as the Kunz Oil property and the Lewis Engineering property, 5201 Eden Circle (the TAGS property), 5244 Eden Circle (the Noonan property), 5237 Eden Avenue (the Edina Pet Hospital property), 5241 Eden Avenue (the Classic Hair Design property) and Sherwood Park (collectively, the "Redevelopment Property "), all within the City of Edina (the "City ") and commonly referred to as the Eden Avenue Redevelopment Project. B. Opus and Clark desire the HRA to adopt condemnation resolutions with respect to acquisition of any portion of the Redevelopment Property not owned by the HRA or the City prior to execution of the Redevelopment Contract. C. As a condition precedent to adopting such condemnation resolutions, the HRA requires Opus and Clark to enter into this Agreement. AGREEMENTS: For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is acknowledged by the parties hereto, it is agreed that: I. Indemnification. Opus and Clark, jointly and severally, will pay, indemnify, defend and hold harmless the HRA and the City from and against all costs, expenses, claims, damages, liabilities and losses arising out of or related in any way to: (A).the adoption by the HRA of any condemnation resolution(s) for acquisition of the Redevelopment Property or any part thereof, (B) the HRA's commencement or pursuit of any condemnation actions for or with respect to the Redevelopment Property, or (C) the enforcement of this Agreement.. Such costs to be paid by Opus and Clark shall include but not be limited to any relocation costs which the HRA becomes obligated to pay as a result of the matters referred to in A, B or C Hof this Section 1, all survey, title and appraisal costs, and all attorney, consultant and expert fees and expenses. 2. Duration. This Agreement shall remain in effect through and including the date that the last party to the Redevelopment Contract executes and delivers the same and shall thereafter automatically terminate, it being the intent of the parties hereto that the payment and indemnification obligations in this Agreement shall be incorporated into the terms of the Redevelopment Contract. If no Redevelopment Contract is executed between the parties, this Agreement shall remain in effect until Opus and Clark have satisfied all payment and indemnity obligations as required pursuant to Section 1 above. 3. Payment of Costs. All costs, expenses, claims, damages, liabilities and losses to be paid by Opus and Clark hereunder shall be paid to the HRA within 10 days after written demand therefor. Any such amounts which are not paid within 10 days after the HRH's written demand for the same will bear interest from the date due to the date paid at an annual rate equal to (A) the "prime rate" as published in the Wall Street Journal, or if the Wall Street Journal no longer publishes such a rate or successor rate, then the reference or prime rate, successor rate or similar rate determined by a national banking institution reasonably selected by the HRA, plus (B) 4 percentage points per annum, or the maximum rate of interest permitted by law, whichever is less, and the interest will be paid to the HRA on demand. 4. Amendments. This Agreement may not be amended or modified except in writing executed by all parties hereto and by the HRA and the City. EXECUTION: The parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first stated above. OPUS: OPUS NORTHWEST L.L.C. By: Its: CLARK: R.E.C., INC. By: -2- Its: -3- Agenda Item: HILULD MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Gordon Hughes, City Manager FROM: Jerry Gilligan DATE: May 11, 2000 RE: Adoption by HRA of Resolution Authorizing Condemnation of Certain Property Attached is a form of resolution for consideration by the HRA authorizing the acquisition by the HRA through eminent domain of certain property proposed to be redeveloped in the Grandview Redevelopment Area. The adoption by the HRA of the resolution is the first step in the condemnation process. The properties subject to the resolution are listed on Exhibit A to the resolution and are (i) 5201 Eden Circle (the TAGS property), (ii) 5244 Eden Circle (the Noonan property), (iii) 5237 Eden Avenue (the Edina Pet Hospital property), and ( iv) 5241 Eden Avenue (the Classic Hair Design property). The adoption of this resolution is being requested by Grandview, L.L.C. in connection with the proposed redevelopment of the property. Staff has informed Grandview, L.L.C. that the HRA will not consider the resolution unless the attached Indemnification Agreement has been executed and delivered by Opus Northwest L.L.C. ( "Opus ") and Ron Clark Construction ( "Clark "). By the Indemnification Agreement Opus and Clark jointly and severally agree to pay all costs, expenses, claims, damages, liabilities and losses of the HRA and the City arising out of or in any way related to the adoption of the condemnation resolution and the pursuit of any condemnation action. Such costs to be paid by Opus and Clark include any relocation costs which the HRA may become obligated to pay and all attorney, consultant and experts fees and expenses. The payment and indemnification obligations of the Indemnification Agreement will be incorporated into the Redevelopment Contract between the HRA and Grandview, L.L.C. and such obligation will be guaranteed jointly and severally by Opus and Clark. However, since the Redeveloper has requested that prior to the execution and delivery of the Redevelopment Contract the HRA adopt the condemnation resolution it is necessary for the Indemnification Agreement to be delivered to provide the necessary protection to the HRA and the City. JPG:cmn Enclosure Agenda Item:HRA.II.D RESOLUTION WHEREAS, it is necessary, advisable, and in the public interest that the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the "HRA "), a body politic and corporate under the laws of the State of Minnesota, acquire for redevelopment purposes, and pursuant to the redevelopment plan entitled "Grandview Area Redevelopment Plan" dated May 30, 1984 approved by the HRA on June 18, 1984, as amended by amendments approved by the HRA on April 7, 1997 and December 7, 1999 (as so amended, the "Redevelopment Plan ") and a redevelopment project being undertaken pursuant thereto (the "Redevelopment Project"), property within the area subject to the Grandview Redevelopment Plan; and WHEREAS, in order to accomplish the objectives and purposes set out in the Redevelopment Plan and the Redevelopment Project, it is necessary that the properties described on Exhibit A attached hereto and hereby made a part be redeveloped; and WHEREAS, the HRA has been advised that said property will not be made available for redevelopment in a manner that would allow the HRA to undertake the Redevelopment Project and meet the objectives and purposes of the Redevelopment Plan and Redevelopment Project unless it is acquired by eminent domain; and WHEREAS, in order to undertake the Redevelopment Project and provide for the redevelopment of said property in a manner that would meet the objectives and purposes of the Redevelopment Plan and Redevelopment Project, it will be necessary to procure the same by the right of eminent domain. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that in order to undertake the Redevelopment Project and provide for the redevelopment of the property described on Exhibit A hereto in a manner that would meet the objectives and purposes of the Redevelopment Plan and Redevelopment Project the HRA proceed to acquire the property described on Exhibit A hereto and all interests therein under its power of eminent domain; and that the attorneys for the HRA be instructed and directed to file the necessary petition or petitions therefor and to prosecute such action or actions to a successful conclusion, or until it is abandoned, dismissed or terminated by the HRA or the Court; and that the attorneys for the HRA, the Director and Executive Director of the HRA and the Chairman and Secretary of the HRA do all things necessary to be done in the commencement, prosecution and successful termination of such eminent domain proceedings. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that it is hereby found and declared that the acquisition of the property described on Exhibit A hereto and all interests therein by the HRA under its power of eminent domain is necessary to redevelop blighted and substandard areas in the area subject to the Grandview Redevelopment Plan. EXHIBIT A 5201 Eden Circle Lot 3, Block 1, Wanner Addition, together with an easement over and across the south 25 feet of Lot 2, Block 1, Wanner Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 5244 Eden Circle All of Lot 7, Block 1, and that part of Lots 5 and 6, Block 1, Edenmoor, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying North and East.of the Northerly line of Eden Circle (formerly known as Downing Street) as described in Document No. 31643311; Also, the Southerly six feet of Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Edenmoor, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 5237 Eden Avenue Lot 2, Block 1, Edenmoor, Hennepin County, Minnesota, except the south six feet thereof, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 5241 Eden Avenue Lot 3, Block 1, Edenmoor, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. GrubbrEllis® Property Solutions Worldwide May 11, 2000 Mr. Gordon Hughes City Manager City of Edina 4801 West 501h Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 AGENDA ITEM: HRA II.D. Edina City Council Members Mr. Dennis Maetzold Mr. Mike Kelly Ms. Nan Faust Mr. Jim Hovland Mr. Scott Johnson Re: Grandview Square Redevelopment Project Dear Gordon and Members of the City Council: As you may be aware, Opus Northwest L.L.C. and Ron Clark Construction have retained me to negotiate the private acquisition of properties needed for the Grandview redevelopment project. I am writing to you in anticipation of the upcoming City Council meeting on May 16th which will have a significant focus on the Grandview Project. I am concerned that you may be receiving correspondence from some of the property owner's indicating that they feel they have not been treated fairly or communicated with adequately. As the party responsible for spearheading the negotiations between the property owners and the proposed developer, I feel it is only appropriate to address this misinformation that you are receiving. In response, I am providing you with an overview of the various negotiations with each of the property owners and, in some cases their tenants, from my perspective. I can assure you that I have had._Tagnsixe communication with all property owners, their representatives and/or their legal council since January of this year. Building Owner: Eden Circle Limited Partnership Owner Contact: Jim Wadsworth ( "Owner ") Attorney: Jim Dorsey Tenants: TAGS ( "Thompson Academy of Gymnastics ") Cross Technology, Inc. Grubb & Ellis Company 5850 Opus Parkway Suite 150 Minnetonka, MN 55343 612.912.8500 612.912.8585 +ext. 612.912.0123, fax After numerous meetings since January, we have reached a tentative agreement with the Owner including lease termination and relocation benefits for Cross Technologies. At the present time we have not reached an agreement for TAGS relocation benefits. CROSS TECHNOLOGY. Inc. : Attorney: Tim Nolan from Rider, Bennett, Egan & Arundal Real Estate Broker: None. Have found new location on their own. • Met with Cross in January to discuss project and tour space. • Two days later we met again, this time bringing our relocation benefits consultant with us to review Cross' space. • Submitted a proposal to Owner that included relocation benefits for Cross. This was forwarded by the Owner to Cross. • Met again in February with Cross partners, their attorney and our appraiser to discuss relocation benefits and what they are entitled to 'in this process. They had prepared their own estimate which we felt was unreasonable. We discussed their number and how they had arrived at it. We also discussed the issues relating to this move from Cross' perspective. Timing and parallel systems were critical issues for them. • Discussed concept of "Put Agreement" with Gordon Hughes in March to give Cross the comfort level they would need -to begin their relocation prior to closing on the property. • Based upon feedback from Gordon, we restructured our proposal to be a "non- contingent" offer and established foundation to make deal with Cross. • Continued to negotiate relocation benefits through Jim Wadsworth based on new structure. • Arrived at conceptual agreement just before May IS` TA Attorney: Real Estate Broker: Russ Crawford from Equity Commercial Services • Had initial meeting with Julia Artz in January. Discussed process and anticipated timing. • Toured their space with our relocation benefit consultant. Grubb & Ellis Company 5850 Opus Parkway Suite 150 Minnetonka, MN 55343 612.912.8500 612.912.8585 +ext. 612.912.0123, fax • Had a variety of conversations with Julia Artz after we had our initial meeting. She informed me that they had hired Russ Crawford from Equity Commercial Services to help them find new space. • Spoke with Russ about process and timing. Indicated that I had found a couple of properties at 70`h & Cahill that may work. He was going to discuss with Julia & Greg. • Have had 3 or 4 conversations with Russ since then updating him on status of project and anticipated timing. • Met with Julia and Greg in late March to discuss relocation benefits. They had prepared an estimate that we felt was unrealistic and over reaching. Jim Wadsworth, our appraiser and I met with Julia and Greg. We informed him that he was not entitled to things that he had outlined in his relocation budget. Greg informed us that he did not care if he was entitled or not. He said he was not happy with the city and that he intended to fight the process publicly. We indicated that we wanted to avoid , an adversarial situation and that we wanted to make a reasonable deal. Greg indicated that he had been successful fighting the City of Apple Valley and he was now prepared to take on Edina this time. He said that Apple Valley had settled at the 11 `h hour and paid him very well for his inconvenience. We left the meeting and contacted .Gordon Hughes to discuss our meeting with TAGS. We discussed the concept of buying the ,property without TAGS and condemning them after purchase because they were taking an unreasonable position. I forwarded a package of 10 properties to Russ Crawford that I had researched for a similar client in the Edina area as added support to helping them find a new location. ,At the present time, we have a conceptual agreement with the Owner to purchase the building including a lease termination from Cross, but without TAGS. We feel confident that TAGS relocation benefits will be obtained for considerably less then they are asking by having the condemnation process as leverage. 5241 Eden Avenue (Classic Hair Design building) Building Owner: Jack F. Zwirtz Attorney: Rolf Worden Grubb & Ellis Company 5850 Opus Parkway Suite 150 Minnetonka, MN 55343 612.912.8500 612.912.8585 +ext. 612.912.0123, fax Tenant: Classic Hair Design • Initial contact was made by letter on January 10th, 2000. • I was contacted by Rolf Worden and he indicated that he would be handling this matter for Mr. Zwirtz. Rolf said that they were getting an appraisal done and that we could negotiate a deal upon its receipt. • We have discussed a variety value ranges with Rolf and recently submitted an offer which is currently being evaluated by the owner. Our offer includes flexibility in timing for the stylists who work there without penalizing the owner. • We anticipate having an agreement in the next week. 5237 Eden Avenue (Edina Pet Hospital building) Building Owner: Dr. Daniel Shebuski Attorney: Fred Burstein Real Estate Broker: Tom Junnilla • Initial contact was made. by letter on January 10th, 2000. • I then met with Dr.Shebuski and his wife on January 19, 2000. They indicated that they did not want to move. They said there were no locations that were acceptable to them. They said their use was so unique that we would have to buy their business. I indicated that I was there to discuss the real estate only, and that the business piece would be a separate discussion, • I asked if he had a current appraisal on the property. He indicated that he had received a partial appraisal a couple of years earlier. I told him that we would pay to have it updated so that he would have an accurate understanding of the buildings value for our negotiations. We informed him that we had no obligation to do this, but that we felt it was important for him to understand the buildings value in order to negotiate with us. We asked only that they share the value from the appraisal with us (not the whole appraisal, just the appraised value) since we were paying for the appraisal for him. • We toured the building with our relocation consultant to assess the building from a relocation benefit perspective. In February, we met with Dr. and Mrs. Shebuski, and their real estate broker Tom Junnilla. I have had 3 conversations with Tom, since that meeting to update him on the status of the project. • Based upon my initial meeting with Dr. & Mrs. Shebuski, combined with some of their comments, I researched the market for locations in Edina that had the appropriate zoning for a Pet Hospital, not a Pet Clinic. I found three properties that were zoned properly, two that were at 70th & Cahill. One of these two was a lease option where the Owner had already told me he would accept a Pet Hospital as a Grubb & Ellis Company 5850 Opus Parkway Suite 150 Minnetonka, MN 55343 612.912.8500 612.912.8585 +ext. 612.912.0123, fax tenant. I forwarded this information to Craig Larsen at the City of Edina and then to Fred Burstein with a copy to Dr. Shebuski (see attached letter and info dated February 24th, 2000). I received a call from Dr. Shebuski directly.. He said he didn't like the area, and that it was too close to one of his competitors. He said he "didn't want to move and that we would have to buy his business. Period!" At which point he hung up on me. • I have had 4 or 5 conversations with the attorney � concerning this matter since our conversations began in January. • We made an offer to purchase the building from Dr. Shebuski on May 4`", 2000 but have not received a response to our offer. 5244 Eden Circle (Noonan Construction building) Building Owner: Ed Noonan Real Estate Broker. Ed Noonan Attorney: Jack Harper Tenants: Noonan Construction Marty Chiropractic Exterior. Design Studio Rentopia/Fonahome/Isign Power Source Personal Training • Initial contact was by letter on January 10'h, 2000. • Received call from Ed Noonan on January 11th, 2000 • Initial meeting on January I P, 2000 with Ed Noonan and his attomey /friend Jack Harper. Ed requested that the project be redesigned around them I told him that this was not possible but that we wanted to treat him fairly in buying the property. He indicated he was prepared to fight us "all the way" • I indicated that we needed to get some idea of what he felt the value of his building was so we could discuss a settlement. After weeks of discussion with Jack Harper requesting a purchase price, we received an offer letter dated March 7`h, 2000. Based upon our research of the market we felt this offer was significantly out of context (by over $1 million). • We countered their offer on March 22nd, based on.our market research, but we have not had any conversations since our offer was submitted. We have only heard that Ed Noonan purchased a building at 44'h & France that is set to close sometime in May. I have tried to highlight the negotiations that have taken place with all of the property owners impacted by this proposed project. As you can see, I responded immediately to all the owners upon my being retained by Opus /Clark and have been proactive in trying to resolve open issues presented by owners or tenants willing to engage in reasonable negotiations. I believe the fact that we have been able to address Jim Wadsworth' issue as an owner, Cross Technologies issues as a tenant and appear to be close to an agreement with Jack Zwirtz indicates that we have not been unreasonable in our discussions. Additionally, since TAGS and Dr. Shebuski have retained real estate professionals to represent them in finding new space, my ability to assist them is limited to adjunct support. These parties have hired professionals who have a fiduciary obligation to help their clients. I must respect their role as an exclusive representative and assume that they are researching the market for solutions that their clients needs. I have been proactive in my communication with all property owners since being hired, I have forwarded information to tenants that I felt was pertinent to their relocation in an attempt to assist them in their process and have taken the necessary time resources to understand the issues of the owners and their tenants. I would be happy to discuss any of these negotiations in greater detail if you so desire. Please call if you have any questions. Sincerely, Stephen H. Brown, CCIM Vice President Grubb & Ellis Advisory Services cc: Tom Lund Heidi Kurtze Jim Holmes Bob Strachota Grubb & Ellis Company 5850 Opus Parkway Suite 150 Minnetonka, MN 55343 612.912.8500 612.912.8585 +ext. 612.912.0123, fax Agenda Item: HR.A.ILE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF SWAP AGREEMENT New Library. Upon satisfaction of the preconstruction requirements discussed below, the HRA agrees to construct the library (the "New Library ") that is a part of the Library /Senior Center building described in the Redevelopment Contract between the HRA and Grandview Square, L.L.C. ( "Grandview "). 2. The Swap. When the New Library is substantially completed, the HRA will convey the New Library to Hennepin County (the "County ") and the County will convey to the City the buildings and improvements located at 4701 West 500, Street, Edina, Minnesota (the "County Property"). 3. Pre - Construction Requirements. The HRA will commence construction of the New Library after construction by Grandview under the Redevelopment Contract has commenced and as soon as reasonable possible after: A. title to the Library/Senior Center Site is conveyed to and/or acquired by the HRA; B. drawings and specifications for the New Library are mutually approved in writing by the HRA, the County and Grandview; C. drawings and specifications for the Senior Center are mutually approved in writing by the HRA, the City, the County and Grandview; D. the County and the HRA agree upon the terms of a master declaration for the Library/Senior Center land, building and related improvements providing the necessary agreements for operation of the New Library and the Senior Center within the building, coordination of vehicular and pedestrian ingress and egress to the New Library and the Senior Center, and the joint use, maintenance and repair of all common areas, building systems, utilities and parking lots serving the Library/Senior Center land, building and related improvements; E. the County, the City, the HRA and Grandview agree on the terms of an agreement which will control pond and storm water collection issues for the Library /Senior Center Site and all other parcels to be redeveloped under the terms of the Redevelopment Contract; F. the County shall have determined that it is satisfied with the results of and matters disclosed by environmental site assessments, soil tests, engineering inspections and environmental reviews of the Library /Senior Center Site obtained by or provided to such party, which tests, assessments, inspections and reviews shall be obtained at the acquiring party's sole cost and expense; and, G. the HRA shall have determined that it is satisfied with the results of and matters. disclosed by environmental site assessments, soil tests, engineering inspections and environmental reviews of the Library/Senior Center Site and the County Property obtained by or provided to such party, which tests, assessments, inspections and reviews shall be obtained at the acquiring party's sole cost and expense. H. the HRA and the County agree on the portion of the costs of maintaining off -site improvements that are to be paid by the County. 2 I olle REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item: II. A. From: Craig Larsen Consent ❑ City Planner Information Only ❑ Date: May 16, 2000 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Action: ❑ Motion Preliminary Rezoning and ® Resolution Overall Development Plan. ❑ Ordinance Opus /Clark- Grandview Square ❑ Discussion Recommendation: The Planning Commission recommends Preliminary Approval of the Overall Development Plan (rezoning all properties to MDD -4, Mixed Development District) conditioned on: 1. Final Rezoning 2. Final Plat 3. Final Site Plan approval for each phase 4. Development Agreement between the HRA, the City, Hennepin County and Opus -Clark 5. Developer's Agreement covering public improvements 6. Watershed District permits 7. City Engineer approval of Eden Avenue curb cuts 8. Road adjacent to park/plaza and senior center should be changed from one - way to two -way. ( The revised site illustrates a 2 way road.) 9. Eliminate parking on southerly cul de sac to provide turnaround for emergency vehicles. (The revised site plan eliminates the parking.) 10. Maintain access to well house. (The revised plan provides for access.) 11. Staff and developer should work to revise site plan to preserve as much of the park as possible in its present location and size. (The revised site plan modifies the park shape, but does not reduce its size.) F` Info /Background: See attached Planning Commission minutes, staff report, memo from the City Engineer, letter from Howard Preston, report from Park Director, letter from Heidi Kurtz of Ron Clark Construction, plans and correspondence. Following the Planning Commission meeting staff retained a traffic engineer to review the site plan and proposed curb cut locations. The evaluation is attached. The report has been reviewed by the City Engineer. Condition 7 would allow Mr. Hoffman to work with the developers to move the main entrance on Eden Avenue as far to the east as possible. Since awarding the Development to Opus /Clark in November, the site plan has been revised several times. All versions of the site plan are attached. The first 3 sheets relate to the most recent revision. The remaining sheets depict earlier site plans. The plan presented for approval reduces residential unit count from 190 units to 172 units. As a result of this reduction Sherwood park is reconfigured, but not reduced in size. To off -set the loss of increment resulting from a lower unit count, the office building is increased in size by 10,000 square feet. Attached is a letter from Heidi Kurtz of Ron Clark Construction which describes the evolution of the site plan. Both the Planning Commission and the Park Board have reviewed the development proposal and have made recommendations to the Council. Each group recommended a development which reduced the impact on Sherwood park. The revised site which provides a park of the same size, is an attempt by the developers to address their recommendations. The attached report of the Park Director explains the Park Board action. At the request of city staff Opus /Clark has agreed to dedicate as public the portion of the internal street system which serves the library/senior center building. The internal street system was originally intended to be private. There are no required setbacks from private streets. However, public streets require setbacks for both buildings and parking. Thus, setback variances are required by the proposed site plan. Staff feels the variances are necessary in order to achieve the urban village development concept. < A. o Le W), REPORURECOMMENDATION To: Mayor Maetzold and members of Agenda Item II. D. the Edina City Council. From: John Keprios, Director Consent ❑ Park & Recreation Department Information Only ❑ ❑ Date: April 12, 2000 Mgr. Recommends To HRA ® To Council ® Subject: Grandview Square Development Motion and Sherwood Park. ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion RECOMMENDATION: The Park Board recommends that the City work further with the developers to explore other possible alternatives in efforts to sacrifice even less and, if possible, none of the existing park land at Sherwood Park. INFOBACKGROUND: At the April 11, 2000, Park Board meeting, the Grandview Square Development's effect on Sherwood Park was discussed. Notices were mailed to resident neighbors of Sherwood Park informing them of the Park Board meeting. Approximately 50 residents were in attendance. The current development plan proposed to utilize .64 acres of existing park Sherwood Park land. Sherwood Park is currently 1.55 acres. With the reconfiguration of Sherwood Park and the addition of the .63 acre Town Square Park, there would be a net gain of .31 acres of land, which includes the greenway connection between Sherwood Park and the proposed Town Square Park. The developers proposed a concept drawing of the reconfigured Sherwood Park that would essentially accommodate the existing park uses. Even with the accommodations for similar park uses, the residents and Park Board agreed that the loss of park land as a buffer and open play area is too significant a loss for the neighborhood to support the current plan. Staff and the developers made presentations. Staff explained to those in attendance that when considering the proposal, we must consider the needs of: • Surrounding neighbors. • Future residents of Grandview Square. • Future Senior Citizen Center participants. • Future library patrons. • The Hennepin County Board (library needs). • Future office tenants. • The Developers. • The City of Edina (need to acquire the library to expand City Hall). • The community as a whole. The developer stated that the main reasons why the current plan requires the need to use existing park land are: 1. The school. bus garage real estate is no longer available to be included in the development. 2. The library insists on the new location for visibility purposes (as opposed to its original proposed placement next to the railroad tracks). 3. There is a need to accommodate adequate on -site surface parking. 4. There is a need to develop enough taxable real estate within the tax increment district to cover the costs of the proposed public improvements (library, senior center and roads and parking). All of the residents who voiced their opinion were opposed to the current proposal that calls for the use of existing park land. Their concerns were the loss of similar recreational opportunities, open space, and most importantly the loss .of a significant buffer between residential and commercial properties. After lengthy discussion, the Park Board unanimously passed a recommendation that the City work further with the developers to explore other possible alternatives in efforts to sacrifice even less and, if possible, none of the existing park land at Sherwood Park. w f May 12, 2000 The Honorable Dennis Maetzold 5110 Arden Avenue. Edina, MN 55424 Re: Grandview Square Dear Mayor Maetzold: CONSTRUCTION cc: All HIWCouncilmembers Gordon Hughes Craig Larsen Eric Anderson 7500 West 78th Street Edina, Minnesota 55439 (612) 947 -3000 fax (612) 947 -3030 Since we last met in December of last year, our team and City staff has been working hard on all aspects of the Grandview Square project. With as many parties as are involved in the project, it has been an exciting opportunity and also a bit of a juggling act to fit all the pieces together in a satisfactory way for everyone involved. These efforts are finally coming together in our presentation to you on Tuesday, May 16th. We know that there will be a lot of information to absorb at the meeting and therefore, we would like to share some important information with you ahead of time regarding two aspects of the project that may be of the most interest to you: 1). Site Plan as it relates to the residential units and the use of Sherwood Park 2). Acquisition of Existing Property While we know there are many other issues at hand for discussion Tuesday evening, we thought it best to clarify these two items prior to the meeting. SHERWOOD PARK At the directive of the City Council during the RFP process to leave Sherwood Park in tact, we took every step possible to stay out of Sherwood Park. Unfortunately, due to the requirement that the library be located on the western part of the site, it forced some of the residential units into the park because there wasn't enough land available to move them elsewhere and maintain 190 units. This shift in planning however was met with substantial opposition from the nearby neighborhood. After working to resolve the financial ramifications of losing units and subsequently, lowering the amount of tax increment, we now feel we have found a solution that works for everyone and is financially feasible. We have received unanimous support for the new plan from staff, including the Park Director. Construction and Design MN Builder License # 0001220 http://www.RonClark.com This plan was also presented to the neighborhood group on May 1 Ph. Our efforts over the last month have been to respond to the neighborhood concerns raised at the March neighborhood meeting. The two main requests were to leave the play equipment in its current location and to takeout the "return" (i.e., intrusion of units) into the park. Despite the fact that we have been able to accomplish both objectives, the most vocal residents are still unhappy with the plan we're presenting. They are very upset that we are reconfiguring less than 1/3 of an acre of the park. I have spoken with some residents of the neighborhood on an individual basis (some who live adjacent to the park) who are now happy with the plan. Unfortunately, these people will not speak in support of it because of neighborhood peer pressure. We believe that in some resident's minds, the only satisfactory plan for Grandview is no plan at all. Therefore, they are unwilling to concede that the new benefits of the library/senior center and plaza space will have any positive impact on them. We believe this view is held only by a handful of residents, but they are the ones who will be most vocal about the project. The intent of the following summary it to help "fill in the blanks" between December and May. We will have the same series of site plans available at the meeting to help walk through where we started in the site planning process during the RFP process to where we are now. We have outlined the major changes that occurred with each plan and how they affected the use of the park. Five site plans are attached in chronological order and should correspond to the summary below. Site Plan 8 -27 -99 Original RFP Submittal —190 units taking the entire park, side -by -side library /senior center on east part of site with bus garage below, a large central plaza and an 80,000 office building with structured public /private parking. 2. 10 -06-99 Revised RFP Submittal —190 units leaving the entire park alone, side -by -side library/senior center on east part of site with bus garage below, smaller green space in place of grand plaza, and an 80,000 office building with structured public /private parking. After we were selected as developers, several changes happened very quickly to the site plan. First, the need to solve the bus garage issue was dropped from the site development; second, the Hennepin County Library insisted that their new facility be on the western side of the site where it would be most visible; third, the reconfiguration required separate parking areas for the library/senior center and office building, precluding the ability to do structured parking. These three changes left nowhere for the residential to go and forced a portion of the residential units into the western edge of Sherwood Park. 3. 11 -22 -99 Site Plan attached to the Letter of Intent - Per the above changes: 190 units taking a section of the park, senior center/library in a two -story structure on the west side of the site, 80,000 square foot office building on the east side of the site, and a modest central plaza. This plan was also sent to all the residents in the Richmond Hills neighborhood in December and was also used for the Vernon Terrace presentation in January. We did not receive any feedback from the neighborhood group (December — March) regarding the section of the park we had taken for residential development. We therefore proceeded refining the plan to be ready for the submission to the Planning Commission in March. 4. 3 -15-00 Plan Submitted for Preliminary Rezoning Approval — This plan, while similar to #3, expanded the plaza area and created a link between the new plaza and the existing park. By creating this link, the western edge of housing was shifted slightly more into the park. This plan was met with considerable objection from the neighborhood group. While the neighborhood was positive and supportive of the plan as a whole, they did not support the reconfiguration of the park. While the park was widened to 163 feet (over 30 wider than the existing park) to compensate for the parkland being taken along the western edge, the neighborhood group, Planning Commission, and Park Board felt that the plan would be better if at least a portion of the housing could be removed from the park entirely. We took the directive from the Planning Commission very seriously and have been working with City Staff for several weeks to revise the plan without creating a substantial financial gap for the project. We believe we are very close to settling the financial issues regarding the loss of units and therefore, we are comfortable presenting a revised plan for preliminary rezoning and site plan approval on May 16th, 2000. 5. 5 -11 -00 Revised Site Plan for City Council/HRA Preliminary Approval This plan has 172 units and removes the residential from the majority of the park. A small, fairly unusable section of the park (.33 acres) along the western edge of the park is still being incorporated for residential development. However, that land has been replaced within Sherwood Park by adding greenspace where Eden Circle currently sits. In fact, we think the new park configuration is better than its existing condition because its rectangular shape (as opposed to its current irregular shape) is more appropriate for ball playing and other activities in the park. The park land calculation showing this overall gain is also attached for your review. In order to preserve the tax increment being generated at the loss of 18 units, the office building has increased by 10,000 square feet. Plan #4 and #5 also include a larger, more usable new plaza area. The plaza area shown on our current plan is a very important part of the plan, given that new residents and persons using the office, library/senior center will be able to enjoy the new park and open space. Programming of this space is yet to be determined and we will work closely with staff to begin preparing detailed plans for the plaza. We are confident that these compromises and alternations satisfy the concerns of staff, the Park Board, the Planning Commission and even some residents while also preserving the town square concept in the spirit of an "Old European Village". PROPERTY ACQUISITION It has come to our attention that there has been a series of miscommunication and misunderstanding about the acquisition and relocation process for the four existing owners and their tenants. We know that this is a sensitive and difficult issue for everyone involved and we have been working diligently since January to work with the owners and address their individual issues. I have attached a memo from Steve Brown, our acquisition/relocation specialist, who has been working with the owners since January to try and reach agreement. We have had success in some areas and are hoping to reach settlements with three of the four owners very soon. Steve's memo outlines his work to date, which we hope will give you the same level of comfort that we have regarding his work. Our meetings with him on a weekly basis have given us confidence that his efforts on our behalf have been attentive, fair, and reasonable. Steve will be at the meeting on Tuesday to answer questions you may have regarding the acquisition process. We look forward to the meeting Tuesday evening and to moving forward with Grandview Square. Knowing how complex this project is, we hope that this letter and attachments will clarify some of the confusion and answer some of your questions in preparation for Tuesday. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions prior to the meeting. Since ly, 611HHeidi Kurtze Project Development Manager DRAFT MINUTES OF THE MARCH 29, 2000, PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Z -00 -2 OVERALL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL PRELIMINARY REZONING TO MDD-4 GRANDVIEW SQUARE GENERAL LOCATION: South of Eden Avenue and west of the Canadian Pacific Railroad tracks. Mr. Larsen informed the Commission the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority, on November 1, 1999, selected the development team of Opus Northwest and Ron Clark Construction as developers of this 13 acre tract. The redevelopment site includes all non - residential property south of Eden Avenue and west of the tracks. The proposed mixed -use project contains 190 condominium units, an office building, a library, a senior center and public park/plaza. The site plan is very similar to the plan reviewed by the Council in November. Mr. Larsen explained the overall development plan attempts to create an old world town square feel with the park/plaza being the focus for all the buildings. Buildings are sited as close as possible to the internal street system, which would have street lined boulevards and sidewalks. The park/plaza is envisioned as a passive park with benches and tables. Mr. Larsen concluded the proposed site plan is consistent with the plan reviewed by the HRA/City Council in November,1999. The most significant change is the addition of the park/plaza as the central focus of the development. Staff recommends preliminary approval of the rezoning to MDD -4 conditioned on: 1. Final rezoning 2. Final Site Plan approval for each phase 3. Final plat approval 4. Development Agreement 5. Developer's Agreement 6. Watershed District Permits . Ms. Heidi Kirtz, Mr. Jack Buxell, Mr. Dan Young- Young- Dixon, Mr. Dean Newins and Mr. Wally Case were also present representing Opus /Clark. Interested residents were present. Commissioner McClelland asked Mr. Larsen to clarify for her the requested parking variance. Mr. Larsen explained the proposed two story library/senior center building has upper and lower areas with a total of 101 parking spaces. 17 parking spaces are provided on the street adjacent to the lower level. Mr. Larsen said the combined uses of the library/senior center require 177 spaces so a parking variance is required. Mr. Larsen acknowledged the requested variance does appear large, but staff believes the parking needs the proposed uses generate will be met. Commissioner McClelland asked Mr. Larsen the present number of parking stalls at the existing library. Mr. Larsen said the library has 33 stalls with more stalls available in the city hall parking lot. Chairman Johnson questioned Mr. Larsen if Opus will own the proposed office building. Mr. Larsen said presently Opus is the owner and developer. Chairman Johnson asked Mr. Larsen if he anticipates shared parking to resolve some of the parking issues between facilities. Mr. Larsen said that is correct. Commissioner Ingwalson pointed out Fran Hoffman, City Engineer, has indicated he would prefer a two -way road system instead of the proposed one - way system on the northwest side. Mr. Larsen said that is correct, Mr. Hoffman believes a two -way system would lower pedestrian /auto conflict. Commissioner Runyan asked Mr. Larsen if the fire department has reviewed the plans for emergency access. Mr. Larsen said the plans have been reviewed and approved by the fire department subject to the elimination of parking and keeping the turnaround open on the cul -de -sac at the south end of the project. Ms. Kirtz told Members of the Commission the development team met with neighbors who expressed concerns regarding the proposed park. Continuing, Ms. Kirtz explained revisions have been made to the plan, and as a result the housing portion of the project has encroached into the existing park. Mr. Jack Buxell explained to Commission Members that much effort was made to maximize the site. He told the Commission the reason the housing element infringes on the park is because changes were incorporated into the plan which relocated the proposed library and senior center. The park was redesigned to accommodate the relocation of various building elements. Continuing, Mr. Buxell said the site has two small ponds to accommodate water run - off with one pond operating in a manner similar to the pond at Centennial Lakes. Mr. Dan Young -Dixon told the Commission the proposal is developed with an "old world" flavor. Mr. Young -Dixon said at this time the development team is requesting preliminary rezoning approval and overall development approval. He explained as the process moves along each phase of development will come before the Commission and Council. Mr. Young -Dixon addressed the issue of the change to the park explaining that the Hennepin County Library system .requires a location with easy access and visibility, which is the reason the changes have occurred, in the plans. Chairman Johnson asked the square footage of the proposed library. Mr. Young -Dixon responded the library is proposed at about 12,000 square feet. Commissioner Workinger questioned if the park will be included in Phase I of the development. Mr.. Young -Dixon said the park is proposed for Phase I. Commissioner McClelland asked Mr. Young -Dixon if he believes a number of seniors will travel to the new center via a bus. Mr. Young -Dixon said it is possible that a number of senior facilities in Edina will have buses available for use to the new center. Commissioner McClelland pointed out Edina is an aging community and in her opinion the use of the proposed senior center and library will greatly increase. Commissioner Lonsbury asked if he could have some direction on proposed landscaping of the project, especially as it relates to the proposed new park area and its uses. Mr. Larsen interjected and explained City Staff is very excited about this project, but there is a concern over the Park and Recreation departments inability to have its budget take on more park maintenance costs. Mr. Larsen said for the most part the proposed city square park is a passive park with no scheduled activities, and little up -keep. He added any activities that may occur in the new park area would be conducted through the library and senior center, reiterating the park would largely be a passive park. Mr. Young -Dixon said the development team is very anxious to work with the community on the proposed new park area. He agreed with Mr. Larsen's comment that the proposed new park area would be a passive area. Mr. Young - Dixon told the Commission landscaping of this area is in the development stages, and the development team is working with the park director. Concluding Mr. Young -Dixon said he envisions this area as flexible space, used by the new residents to the south, by the neighborhood and surrounding areas. It will also be used also by seniors at the senior center and office workers. Commissioner Lonsbury asked if the new proposed park site,will contain green grass with paths, or concrete walking paths. Mr. Young -Dixon said it may be both. Chairman Johnson asked about buffering for the homes on Edenmoor. Mr. Young -Dixon responded that area will be heavily landscaped. Continuing, Mr. Young -Dixon explained it is the goal of the development team to save as much existing vegetation as possible, especially the existing large trees in the existing park. Concluding, Mr. Young -Dixon told. the Commission the proposed landscaping plans incorporate 250 overstory trees, 100 evergreens , 130 understory trees, and several thousand shrubs and perennials. Mr. Young - Dixon said the team recognizes with a four story office building and residential buildings the need to plat substantial trees to soften the structures and bring the new buildings into scale. Commissioner Runyan asked if coniferous tress will be planted along the south Fine. Mr. Young -Dixon responded in the affirmative. Mr. Larsen told the Commission he would like to address the scheduling of the project. He noted this evening the preliminary rezoning and overall development plan are before the Commission for review. To date the Park Board has not heard the proposal, and will consider the park element of the proposal at its April 11 "' meeting. Mr. Larsen said the City Council will hear the proposal at their April 18, 2000, meeting and at that time will receive the input of the Commission and the Park Board. Chairman Johnson asked when the plan will be back before the Commission. Mr. Larsen said he believes Phase I of the plan will be forwarded . to the Commission for the May 31, 2000 meeting, with construction to begin mid- summer. Chairman Johnson asked for comments from the audience. Mr. Menke, 5301 Pinewood Trail, asked the Commission to reject the proposal because it does not leave the existing park in its original state. Mr. Menke said in his opinion no one in the neighborhood will use the proposed "town square" portion of the park, and it is unrealistic to believe it would ever be used. Mr. Ullom, 5229 Richwood Drive, told the Commission he wants the park to remain the same. It is used by the neighborhood and the neighborhood will never use the proposed town square. Commissioner McClelland asked for a show of hands from residents if their concern is with the park. A majority of residents raised their hands. Mr. Steve Loehr, 5216 Richwood Drive, told the Commission he wants green space maintained. Ms. Loehr, 5216 Richwood Drive, told members of the Commission as a young child she learned to catch a ball, and hit golf balls at the park, and has used the park all her life. She asked the Commission to keep the park as it is. Mr. Art Heiam, 5205 Richwood Drive, presented to the Commission a signed petition requesting that the park remain as is. He pointed out the encroachment of the condominiums into the existing park is unacceptable. Mr. Heiam pointed out 40% of the existing park is lost to the new "town park ". Mr. Corky Weber asked why the project does not contain a commercial building. Mr. Larsen explained the City Council believed the proposed mixed use better suits the site.. Commissioner Workinger interjected and asked Mr. Larsen if the number of housing units remains the same as previously proposed. Mr. Larsen said the housing element contains the exact number previously presented. Ms. Dudek, 6021 Vernon Avenue, asked if a price has been set for the townhomes /condominiums. Ms. Kirtz responded 190 units are proposed. The market focus will be the empty nester, and the prices will range from the high 100 thousands to 400 thousand plus. Ms. Kirtz said she believes the average unit price will be 285 thousand. Sizes of the units will be between, 1,100 and 2,300 square feet. Mr. V Lang, interested resident asked for clarification on library access. Mr. Newins, explained the property is flat through the plaza area and access to the senior center and library from the plaza area will be from the rear. There is an elevation change with'front access to the center and library at a higher elevation. Mr. Ed Noonan, 5244 Eden Circle, told the Commission he owns the office building that will be taken for this project and explained he is frustrated with the timing and lack of information. He pointed out there are so many loose ends, noting the proposed changes that may occur on the city hall site. Mr. Noonan asked where the money for changes to the police department and city hall coming from. Mr. Larsen agreed there are many different elements at work. Mr. Larsen said it is the intention of the City to acquire the existing library space when the library moves to its new location. Mr. Larsen said financial elements of the proposal are being discussed. Commissioner McClelland asked what is needed to accomplish this. Mr. Larsen said a letter of intent is required. Mr. Larsen said it is also his understanding that the City will have to compensate Hennepin County for the library. Mr. Runyan said in reviewing the plans he likes the "town square" addition to the park, but agrees with the neighbors that the new park element will not be used by the existing neighborhood. Commissioner Ingwalson agreed, adding there is a trade off in park spaces that he is not sure about. Commissioner Ingwlason stated that he believes this is a very good project. Commissioner Lonsbury said he views the park element in a different light.. He pointed out there will be 190 new units, with new residents in those units, many of them Edina's empty nesters. He said the proposed new passive park will be enjoyed by the new residents, seniors and office workers, etc. Commissioner Lonsbury said he does agree that the general neighborhood will not use the town park. Commissioner Lonsbury said he would like to see both elements remain in the plan, but would like to see the existing park not reduced. Chairman Johnson commented that it may be possible to redesign the end building thereby preventing loss to the existing park. Mr.' Newins with graphics pointed out the original proposal and the revised proposal. Commissioner Workinger asked Mr. Larsen if it is that important that the library be located in the present location. Mr. Larsen said the library requires the presented location. Chairman Johnson said there appears to be some unanswered questions: and asked the proponents if they would consider tabling this issue. Mr. Larsen interjected that the proposal is an HRA project and in his opinion the process should move forward. Commissioner Ingwalson said in his opinion the charge of the Commission this evening is to pass the general development concept on to the Council as it is presented with suggestions. Commissioner McClelland interjected that in .good conscience she cannot vote on something without knowing the final outcome. She said in her opinion the plans presented are only conceptual. Commissioner Lonsbury said he is confused by Commissioner McClelland's comment. He said as he understands it the proposal that has been presented is conceptual, and that the Commission will review this again as the proposed phases are developed. Commissioner Lonsbury told the Commission in his opinion by voting on this plan this evening the Commission is giving the developer direction and moving the proposal forward to the Council with Commission comments and concerns. Continuing, Commissioner Lonsbury said as he understands the situation the neighbors have concerns regarding the proposed changes to the existing park, adding the Commission can pass this along to the Council noting our reservations regarding loss of original park land. Concluding, Commissioner Lonsbury said he encourages the developer to amend the proposal by changing the park element of the proposal to mirror more closely its original size and location. Commissioner Ingwalson moved to recommend preliminary rezoning and overall development plan approval subject to: 1. Final Rezoning 2. Final Site Plat Approval 3. Final Plat Approval 4. Development Agreement 5. Developer's Agreement 6. Watershed District Permits Commissioner Lonsbury seconded the motion and offered amendments to include: 1. Two -way street system instead of the proposed one -way system (northwest side adjacent to senior center). 2. Eliminate parking on the cul -de -sac on the south end of the project to provide turnaround for emergency vehicles. 3. Access is to be maintained to the well house on park property, and suggesting that staff and developer work together to revise the plan to preserve as much of the park as possible in its present location and size. (see above discussion) Ayes, Lonsbury, Runyan, Ingwalson, Workinger, Johnson. Nay, McClelland. Commissioner McClelland commented that she believes the plan presented this evening is a good plan, adding she needs more solid information before making her decision. LOCATION MAP lei a J J o 1 r N ?Cmj it 7 qg TH ii. CIT HALL 8 F �� OEP/ EDINA PUBLIC WORKS CENTER f OUR LADY t OF GRACE CATHOLIC SCHOOL n WINDSOR AV KENT �� REZONING NUMBER Z -00 -2 L O C A T 10 N South of Eden Avenue and west of the Canadian Pacific Railroad tracks REQUEST Overall Development Plan Approval and Rezoning to MDD -4 3 EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 29, 2000 STAFF REPORT Z -00 -2 OVERALL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL PRELIMINARY REZONING TO MDD -4 GRANDVIEW SQUARE GENERAL LOCATION: South of Eden Avenue and west of the Canadian Pacific Railroad tracks., The Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority, on November 1, 1999, selected the development team of Opus Northwest and Ron Clark Construction as developers of this 13 acre tract. The redevelopment site includes all non- residential property south of Eden Avenue and west of the tracks. The proposed mixed -use project contains 190 condominium units, an office building, a library, a senior center and public park/plaza. The site plan is very similar to the plan reviewed by the Council in November. The overall development plan attempts to create an old world town square feel with the park/plaza being the focus for all the buildings. Buildings are sited as close as possible to the internal street system, which would have street lined boulevards and sidewalks. The park/plaza is envisioned as a passive park with benches and tables. Zoning Issues: Density. In the MDD-4 district residential density is determined through lot area required per dwelling minus certain credits. In this case 2,600 square feet of lot area per dwelling unit is required. Total lot area required is 494,000 square feet. Total site area provided is 566,280 square feet. Non- residential density is awarded based on the number of residential units. The MDD -4 district allows up to 800 square feet of non - residential floor area for each dwelling unit or 152,000 square feet. Public uses are excluded from the formula. The density of the proposed plan complies with ordinance standards. Setbacks. The MDD -4 district requires that all structures maintain a 35 foot setback from the perimeter of the site. The site plan complies with ordinance requirements. Parking is required to maintain a 20 setback from public streets and 10 from interior sideyards. The parking setbacks complies except for library parking adjacent to Sherwood Road where no setback is provided. The parking area was pushed out to the property line in order to provide a parking area in front of the senior center. It also allows for a larger park. Parking. A total of 1.75 spaces per dwelling unit are required for the Condominiums. The plan illustrates 2 under building spaces per unit, plus guest spaces along the internal road system. The 2 story library /senior center building has upper and lower parking areas with a total of .101 spaces in addition there 17 on street spaces adjacent to the lower level. The combined uses require 177 spaces by code. Thus, a 60 space parking variance is required. A total of 335 parking spaces are provided to support the office. Parking is provided on 2 levels, with an additional 38 spaces under the building. The building also has 7 parking spaces in front of the building. Parking for the,office building complies with ordinance requirements. Access and Circulation. The primary access point for the development is on Eden Avenue in the north central portion of the site. A secondary access, primarily for the residential buildings, is located on Sherwood. The plan suggests a one -way circulation system around the park/plaza. The City Engineer has reviewed the plan and suggests the leg adjacent to the senior center be widened and made two way. He also recommends elimination of the spaces at the, end of the most southerly cul de sac to prevent conflict with emergency vehicles. These spaces can be eliminated without the need of a variance. Park Areas. The site plan suggests the elimination of Eden Circle, which would be added to the existing park and to the development. The developers have presented a plan which analyses the net change in the total amount of parkland. Part of the westerly residential building occupies what is now parkland. However, the development would increase total public park area from 1.55 to .1.93 acres. Development Schedule. The redevelopment will occur in phases. Phase 1 would include the office building, the most easterly residential building, the ponding areas, and the park/plaza area, with construction commencing this summer. Phase 2 would include the library and senior center, and the second condominium building. Phase 2 is anticipated to start in the spring of 2001. Completion of the remaining residential buildings would depend on the rate of sales. Recommendation The proposed site plan is consistent with the plan reviewed by the HRA/City Council in November,1999. The most significant change is the addition of the park/plaza as the central focus of the development. Staff recommends preliminary approval of the rezoning to MDD -4 conditioned on: 1. Final rezoning 2. Final Site Plan approval for each phase 3. Final plat approval 4. Development Agreement 5. Developer's Agreement 6. Watershed District Permits Memo To: Craig Larsen, City Planner From: Francis Hoffman, City Engineer Date: ' March 20, 2000 Re: Grandview Square (Attached Plan) The overall plan concept is a good mix with the most peak hour intensive traffic producer (office) located on the northeast corner. Staff assumes they would utilize their main driveway and secondary driveway for ramp entry to disperse traffic onto Eden Avenue. The City will be re- striping the existing street into a three lane roadway, the outer lanes are for through traffic east/west, and the center lane for left turns onto sites on both sides of Eden. Our consulting traffic engineer, Howard Preston from BRW, has reviewed the proposed Eden re- striping and concurs with the concept. After reviewing the preliminary overall site plan (Sheet A1.1), staff would provide the following comments for inclusion in your staff review. Two areas on the overall plan cause concern to us. The first area would be the one - way street system around the proposed plaza /green space. Staff believes the portion of the one -way system (shaded red, northwest side) should be a two -way street. The street segment from Sherwood Road through the site to the exit on Eden Avenue should all be two -way. This would lower the number of pedestrian /auto conflicts around the plaza on three sides by reducing the through traffic. This concept (through street) has long been considered important due to the short distance between the Vernon /Link and Sherwood /Link intersections. This internal segment (through street) provides a second public safety route around the potential bottleneck. The intent of the comment is not to encourage through traffic in the development but to recognize that it may well exist during PM peak traffic hours. Page One The second issue would be the cul -de -sac on the south end of the project (shaded red). Our Fire Department standards are not met but eliminating parking and keeping the turnaround open (similar to Coventry Townhomes on Parklawn) provides ability to maneuver. in the cul -de -sac. Also, parking that close to the neighbors property seems inappropriate. Also, a minor third issue would be keeping access to our well house on park property. This can simply, be done by widening the proposed path and strengthen the pathway from Sherwood to the well house (again shaded red). Finally, the plan must meet stormwater management criteria from the Watershed District and it appears that will be possible but staff does not have detailed information on this issue yet. Page Two d a Howard R. Green Company CONSULTING ENGINEERS April 12, 2000 File: 000400 Mr. Fran Hoffman City Engineer 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 RE: REVIEW OF GRANDVIEW SQUARE CONCEPT PLAN Dear Mr. Hoffman: have reviewed the concept plan relative to site access design issues, as you requested, and have the following comments: 1. There are three site access drives, two driveways to Eden Avenue and one to Sherwood Road. This appears to be reasonable, given both the type and intensity of the proposed development and the very limited frontage along Eden Avenue. 2. The northwesterly site access (to Eden Avenue) is less than 100.feet from the Sherwood Road intersection. This separation is too close to prevent the influence areas of each intersection from overlapping. The desired separation should be on the order of 200 feet. If that is not possible, a separation of approximately 150 feet would be better than what is shown. 3. Lane assignments on the driveway approaches to Eden Avenue are not shown. However, it appears that each driveway has only a single lane of approach. While this is probably sufficient for the driveway to Sherwood Road and the easterly driveway to Eden Avenue, consideration should be given to widening the approach. on the northwesterly drive to Eden Avenue in order to provide both left turn only and right turn only lanes. This lane arrangement would minimize the delay for vehicles waiting to enter Eden and could also encourage waiting vehicles to make the safer right turn movement. 4. The concept plan shows heavily landscaped boulevards adjacent to all of the driveways. Care should be taken in the selection and placement of the plant material so that adequate sight triangles are maintained. For thirty mile per hour speeds, a line of sight from a 3.5 -foot drivers eye height to objects 250 feet away (along both Eden Avenue and Sherwood Road) should be sufficient. 0: \PROJ \000400\Edina\ltr 4 -12 -00 grandview 1'326 Energy Park Drive • St. Paul, MN 55108 • 651/644 -4389 fax 6511644 -9446 toll free 888/368-438 9 Mr. Fran Hoffman April 12, 2000 Page Two 5. Given the planned site access to /from Sherwood Road, it appears likely that some traffic from the Sherwood Road neighborhood -would divert through the development to avoid delays at the Eden Avenue /Sherwood Road intersection. In order to minimize the effects of this through traffic on the site related activities around the Town Square (conflicts with pedestrians, parked cars, etc.), consideration should be given to providing two -way operation on the northwest side of the Square. This would prevent forcing any through traffic from having to circulate around the Square. 6. The site plan does not specify the expected traffic control at any of the driveway or public street intersections. It appears that through /stop control should be sufficient to .provide a reasonable quality of traffic flow with reasonable levels of delay for minor street traffic. I did give consideration to the possibility of installing a traffic signal at either the main site access driveway or the Sherwood Road /Eden Avenue intersection. It is my opinion that both of these locations are too close to the signal at Vernon Avenue to provide a reasonable quality of traffic operations. The close spacing of the intersections and the limited number of lanes would result in a high probability of vehicles queuing back through adjacent intersections if a new signal was installed, and this is a very undesirable condition. Thank you for providing this opportunity to continue serving the City of Edina. Please call me if you have any further questions. Sincerely, Howard R. Green Company Howard Preston, P.E. Traffic Engineering Team Leader Howard R. Green Company 0: \PROJ \000400 \Edina \Itr 4- 12- EtONSULTING ENGINEERS ® MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY HELD AT CITY HALL NOVEMBER 1, 1999 - 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, and Chair Maetzold. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Faust and seconded by Commissioner Hovland approving the Housing and Redevelopment Authority. Agenda as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FOR OCTOBER Commissioner Faust made a motion seconded by approving the Minutes of the Edina Housing and- Rec October 19, 1999. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five aye51 A P . EDINA HOUSING AND 19. • 1999. APPROVED Commissioner Hovland, levelopment Authority for pp, DEVELOPER SELECTED FOR KUNZ/LEWIS SITE Chair Maetzold gave background information into the process that has been followed during the developer selection for the Kunz/Lewis site. At the HRA meeting of October 26, 1999, Opus /Clark Construction was selected after deliberation. Commissioners did not take formal action rather intending to do so at the November 1, 1999, regular meeting. On October 29, 1999, the HRA received a revised plan from Laukka /Jarvis /Namron. He discussed the revised plan with three Commissioners to determine their interest in receiving additional information on the proposal. The Commissioners were interested in receiving more information from Lau kka /Jarvis /Namron. Chair Maetzold said that both_Opus /Clark and Laukka /Jarvis /Namron would make presentations. HRA comments Commissioner Johnson made a motion to hear final proposals from Opus /Clark and from Laukka /Jarvis /Namron. Commissioner Kelly stated he believed the HRA should listen to the proposals. Commissioner Hovland stated that the proposals deserve to be heard and seconded the motion. Commissioner Faust said she hoped the new proposal would be only new information. Commissioner Hovland noted there are many things to worry about. He believes both proposers should be heard even though there was a 'hand shake' type of situation on October 26, 1999. The proposal that came in on Friday put the HRA in a clumsy spot. He reminded the Commissioners that It is the job of the HRA to make decisions in the best interest of the City. Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold Motion carried. Laukka /Jarvis /Namron /Jerry's presentation Larry Laukka, apologized for any concerns the HRA might have with more information coming forward on the Kunz/Lewis site. After they met with the Edina School Board, it was expressed that they wished the bus garage to stay in the Grandview area and at no cost to themselves. Nothing came of the discussions, therefore the Laukka partnership decided to do something on their own. The memo submitted to the HRA on October 29, 1999, by the Laukka partnership, states the belief that the area as a whole needs to be developed. A new location for the bus garage has been sought within the area to no avail. Mr. Laukka proposed keeping the bus garage in its current location. The new part to this proposal would be to re -build the bus garage on its current site and 'turnkey' it back to the School District. Initially the Laukka partnership chose not to deal with the property to the west where the three small businesses operate. He said the TAGS building is out of context with the site and" they have included it into their proposal for the redevelopment. Mr. Laukka continued that.the proposal is a modified expansion of the Jerry's enterprises and their operation by incorporating the bus garage on a level that would access onto Brookside and provide air rights to the commercial development above it. The south side of the proposal would remain as proposed. Mr. Laukka introduced Bob Shadduck of Jerry's Enterprises, Norm Bjornnes of Namron, and Peter Jarvis of Laukka /Jarvis. Mr. Laukka summarized that the Laukka partnership proposal serves the purpose of solving the long- standing issue of the bus garage and leaves intact the three small business properties abutting the proposed development. Their development is good for the whole area and creates a positive image for the Richmond Hills neighborhood. Mr. Laukka said he has been in the building /development business for many years and has built many townhomes and condominiums. He said he knows the market and what can be or cannot be sustained and units between $150,000 - $250,000 will sell. He reported they could enter into an agreement within 30 - 60 days and be ready to begin the Phase 1 modified plan including the bus garage. Chair Maetzold asked clarification if what is being offered would provide a 'turnkey' to the school district without any cost to the taxpayers. Mr. Laukka stated yes. Commissioner Kelly inquired if the numbers were the same as previously presented in the Ehler's report. Mr. Laukka responded. the numbers would be the same except the school district will get the $1 million dollar bus garage facility. Commissioner Kelly It asked whether the car wash and the doctor's building are owned by Jerry's. Mr. Laukka 2 responded the doctor's building is not owned by Jerry's. The plan does not incorporate use of that site. Commissioner Kelly asked if the plan required the acquisition of the doctor's building. Mr. Laukka answered no. Bob Shadduck, Jerry's Enterprises, responded that the doctor's building rents parking from Jerry's to sustain their day in /day out operation. Commissioner Faust questioned if what appears to be free is really free. She asked, if the HRA buys the bus garage for one million dollars then sells it back to Laukka partnership at $717,000, there would be a shortfall of $283,000. Director Hughes explained that the bus garage cannot be built with tax increments. Based upon past appraisals, the most the HRA could pay for the site would be the million dollars. The $717,000 was part of the Jerry's offer on the property. Commissioner Faust asked about the financing which appeared to be the same with the WMEP proposal as well as the project proposed in 1997. Part of the proposal stated the City was responsible for all demolition and clean -up. Mr. Shadduck said h6 believed there is a $500,000 estimate for demolition. Commissioner Faust said nothing is free. She said TIF money could not pay for building the bus garage. Attorney Gilligan stated that would have to be examined if indirectly TIF monies would be used. Commissioner Faust said we could be in real trouble if we were audited. Attorney Gilligan said that is a risk. Mr. Laukka reiterated that is not really an issue. Commissioner Hovland inquired if the Laukka partnership paid two million dollars for the bus property and the school district gets it back for a bus garage. The school district is on record as the proposal being acceptable to build on the site and 'turnkey' the garage. Commissioner Hovland asked when the Laukka partnership would pay for the HRA property. Mr. Laukka said it would be paid when construction begins. Commissioner Hovland asked why the Laukka partnership suggested using G.O. Bonds rather than pay -as- you -go financing. Norm Bjornnes commented with the G.O. Bonds, they would be refunding 3.5 million dollars of bonds already in place with a new issue. There would be an additional 3.5 million dollars of bonds required for the site and would result in a lower cost. The Ehler's analysis showed the Laukka partnership as the most efficient of the four proposals and did not have a deficit because'of fewer dollar demands on TIF dollars. The goal in using G.O Bonds was to only add 3.5 million of new issue to the existing bonds and would be taking the most conservative approach. Commissioner Hovland inquired whether the Laukka partnership would guarantee repayment of all the G.O. Bonds. Mr.. Bjornnes said yes, through the shortfall agreement. Commissioner Hovland asked if the prediction of receiving TIF revenues as soon as 2002 is still valid. Mr. Bjornnes said the schedule is the same. Commissioner Hovland asked if the Laukka partnership was chosen, would their be any contingencies that would predicate performance. Mr. Bjornnes said no. Commissioner Hovland asked if the Laukka partnership would be interested in including the Noonan, pet hospital and hair salon properties. Mr. Bjornnes said it could be feasible but would need the approval-of the building owners.. Commissioner Hovland asked how the decision was made about how much the market would bear in the pricing of the proposed townhouses /condominiums. Mr. Laukka said he has been in business since 1962 and he has an experienced "sense for the market ". 3 on the Laukka partnership experience. Commissioner Faust asked for more elaboration p p p Mr. Shadduck said one office building has been built under the Jerry's auspices. They worked with the City on the Jerry's ramp and agreed to as assessment back on the ramp. Mr. Bjornnes said he has been building projects since 1979 in numerous suburbs for a total of 681 units. Mr. Laukka said the partnership has also built a parking ramp in Edinborough. Commissioner Johnson said the purchase price appears to be approximately $2,500,000 plus , $717,000 for the bus garage and the Opus /Clark purchase price appears higher. Mr. Laukka commented. the bottom line must be the impact on the community and that the partnership has mixed -use, development experience. Chair Maetzold asked clarification if the impact on TIF dollars has changed with the inclusion of the bus garage. Attorney Gilligan said it has a better feel to it' with no change to the original numbers. Mr. Laukka said the outcome will be a new facility with no cost to the school district. The objective is to get rid. of the garage and ,allow the rest of the commercial development to take_ place. The opportunity is good to improve the condition of the area. OQus /Clark presentation Heidi Kurtze, Project Development Manager for Ron Clark Construction introduced Tom Lund, Director of Real Estate Development for Opus Corporation and Ron Clark, CEO of Ron Clark Construction. Ms. Kurtze indicated while they were disappointed that their proposal is being reconsidered they do understand the City's reasoning. She stated their belief that the reason-'they were selected last week will be as valid tonight as it was last week: She spoke on seven points, 1) Scope of the project matches HRA's goals and objectives, 2) Risk to the proposal, 3) Highest property valuation, 4) Realistic schedule, 5) Proper balance, 6) Bus garage is flexible and 7) Experienced development team. 1. Scope The Opus /Clark team does not believe the project should be done piecemeal. There is no bus garage in their proposal. During the RFP process it seemed there was a desire on the part of the City to allow Jerry's the right to develop that site. Out of respect for Jerry's they left the bus garage site out of the proposal. Their numbers work, even with modifications. 2. Risk - Two biggest factors of risk are, 1) developer fails to perform as promised or 2) HRA sells bonds and incurs the cost but falls short on the increment necessary to make the project work. The Opus /Clark team has unparalleled experience with solid financial statements. Their proposal is an 85% pay -as- you -go note while the other partnership proposes a 100% bond sale. The Opus /Clark team is willing to take a $7 million pay -as- you -go note while the other partnership proposes none. After speaking with Rusty Fifield of Ehlers and Associates, it is always less risky for the City to take a pay -as- you -go note to protect the City's bond rating. 4 l I a 3. Property Valuation - $1,000,000 of tax capacity will be generated over the life of the project. 4. Realistic Schedule - The Opus /Clark team is experienced in acquiring property. Over 100 properties were acquired in Minnetonka in a timely manner and included seven businesses and without the use of condemnation. Opus is one of the largest developers in the United States which - grants them the ability to work with businessowners in their relocation efforts. An appropriate amount of time has been built into the schedule to allow these relocations. The Opus /Clark team will use a conservative approach to begin with and end up performing better than anticipated. 5. Proposal is Balanced and Know.Jt Will Work - After the last public meeting, the Opus /Clark team proposal had a gap and were hurt by the realistic timing schedule. They went back to the drawing board and used the Opus architects and engineers to solve a three million dollar problem. Since it is the desire to incorporate the larger site, the Opus /Clark team proposal shows how much tax increment will be generated, how much property value will be created, know the schedule to follow, know what they plan to build, and how they plan to pay for it. 6. Bus Garage - The development plus the bus garage could be done on a 'turnkey' basis with no cost to the City. Other uses above the bus garage could be considered, i.e., retail, hotel, office or for Jerry's to expand. The site could be utilized for use of the relocated businesses from across the street. There are many solutions for the bus garage and it should be studied. The 50,000 square feet behind the public works building could be a potential development site. Further possibilities. exist to build under the bus garage, build along 70'h Street or, build along the railroad tracks. Some of the other sites may be more cost effective than re- building on the current site. Time does not permit a thorough financial analysis of the best location for the bus garage and what ,should be built in its place. The Grandview proposal can proceed without a final, answer on the bus garage. If the City chooses another developer to develop the bus sOpus/Clark or he Kunz/Lewis os to concur. The main point of the RFP was to select a develop and the timing is critical to select the best developer for producing a new library and senior center for the community. The bus garage problem ,needs solving but it requires more study. 7. Experience -The experience of Ron Clark done. Opus/ /Clark give eam the has an confidence in their ability to get the unparalleled success rate in delivering on -time and with customer satisfaction. Ron Clark has been in the business for 25 years and has an unparalleled reputation for quality and customer satisfaction. Ms. Kurtze said she has worked for the City of Minnetonka, Hennepin County, and City of Chicago in affordable housing development. If the City desires to incorporate affordable housing in the plan, she is well equipped to bring in livable community dollars for the project. Ms. Kurtze concluded with the reason the Opus /Clark team was chosen on October 29, 1999, was because the City was offered the greatest benefit with "the least level of risk for the proposed development. HRA comments 4i LE Commissioner Kelly clarified that the Opus /Clark team is offering a solution with the bus garage at no cost to the City as well. Ms. Kurtze answered yes and added there is, at present, 1.2 million dollars in funds which could be reallocated to the bus garage. Commissioner Johnson said during the work session he questioned all the developers whether the smaller development proposed by the Laukka partnership had less risk to the City. He came away feeling that the Opus /Clark team would say there would be less risk to the City in their proposal regardless if they use the higher pay -as- you -go method or if the construction schedule is slower than the other development, and all would be Opus /Clark team's responsibility. Ron Clark responded yes. The most important thing is the Opus /Clark team would be taking over a seven million dollar pay -as- you -go note as well as they have offered that they would be subordinate to the G. O. Bonds. He added this is very important as the City gets paid first. Commissioner Faust asked about the Opus /Clark team's experience. Ron Clark answered he has been building townhomes and condominiums for 25 years for an approximate total of 1,000. Mr. Lund responded that Opus has built over 41 million square feet of office space with adjacent parking ramps. Commissioner Faust inquired if they had any experience building libraries. Mr. Clark said the Opus /Clark team has built a university library. Commissioner Faust asked if building height next to the park could be reduced and increased on the railroad track side because of neighborhood concern. Mr. Clark said the Opus /Clark team is flexible and a balance needs to be sought to answer neighborhood concerns as well as financial obligations. Commissioner Hovland asked when will the Opus /Clark team pay for the HRA owned land. Mr. Clark said on the date of closing. Commissioner Hovland asked if there are any contingencies the Opus /Clark team would require in order to enter into a development agreement with the HRA. Mr. Clark said no. Commissioner Hovland said certain assumptions were made about closing the gap. If the value. of the adjoining properties is significantly higher than anticipated, what is the impact on the project as proposed. Mr: Lund explained in Minnetonka some property owners set values extremely high on their properties. The city did not go through the condemnation process but worked out an equitable solution using appraised values. This should be done as soon as possible. Commissioner Hovland asked if a condemnation agreement should be made a part of a contingency. Mr. Lund said they' have not met with the businessowners to find out their attitude towards price. Commissioner Hovland asked .if it would be necessary to acquire the surrounding properties before paying for the HRA land. Mr. Lund said they would need the ability to acquire the property because the proposal depicts the office building in that location. Commissioner Johnson stated he understood that the financial risk is borne by the developer in any case if it is a regular or a quick take condemnation. He inquired whether the question was financial or if the City does not want to use condemnation as a matter of public policy. Commissioner Hovland said using condemnation is a matter of public policy. [.1 8 ® Commissioner Kelly said public policy regarding condemnation has not been discussed yet. Commissioner Hovland asked if the pay -as- you -go note exceeds the seven million dollars, who pays for that. Ms. Kurtze said the Opus /Clark team would do that. If the number gets exceedingly large the value being created would need to be examined further. Mr. Clark said the City's G.O. Bonds would get paid back first. If Opus /Clark does not capture enough dollars to pay back the note, it's their problem. The Opus /Clark team believes their proposal has the lowest risk to the City. Commissioner Kelly asked the Opus /Clark team to elaborate on why they believe their proposal has the least amount of risk. Mr. Clark explained that everything is paid for up front through the Opus /Clark teams cash equity and borrowed dollars. It will be the Opus /Clark team's responsibility to pay it back either to themselves, or to the lender. The tax increments being generated already are enough to pay the City back. The only risk is if the current owners don't pay their taxes. Ms. Kurtze noted there is money in the budget of $3.5 million to pay off old existing debt in the district. The Opus /Clark team is proposing that new G.O. Bonds be issued for $2.5 million. The Opus /Clark team will be carrying a million dollars of existing debt with the pay -as- you -go note. Commissioner Hovland asked if the Opus /Clark team is prepared to proceed with the project without acquisition of the abutting properties. Mr. Lund said the Opus /Clark team has to have the land before they can start building. Commissioner Faust asked for a short course on the timing of condemnation. Commissioner . Kelly said in an assemblage there is the understanding that a condemnation will happen if the developer and owner are unable to come to agreement. There are unscrupulous owners who will try to take advantage with unreasonable prices for their property. An agreement with a clause in place stating our efforts would be supported by the condemnation policy. The City would temper the situation but the developer and owner must reach agreement. Attorney Gilligan indicated the development team should negotiate .the property purchase. A resolution should stand behind and exercise the condemnation policy. He noted there could be tax advantages to property owners. There are two different types of condemnation, 1) Quick Take Condemnation - which could take 120 days, with a hearing to determine compensation by three court- appointed commissioners, or 2) Normal Condemnation - in a hearing there would be an award to determine the rights to appeal and could take from 6 - 10 months. Commissioner Kelly reiterated the condemnation process takes a long time and would have tax implications. Attorneys take condemnation cases on a contingency basis and the legal costs can be exorbitant. 7 Chair Maetzold said since the developer cannot proceed without the abutting properties would this indicate the need for a closing date for all three properties or only that condemnation powers must be in place. Mr. Clark answered. the availability of the properties is the most important component. Commissioner Hovland asked if the project had to be downsized, what would be the affect on the Opus /Clark team's development. Mr. Clark responded they would have to modify their proposal and develop in the best interest of the City. Commissioner Hovland asked if there would be room in the development for relocation of the three properties. Mr. Clark said yes. Ms. Kurtze added building a gymnasium on the lower part of the property has been considered because of the slope of the site to possibly accommodate a TAGS relocation. Public comment Darlene Roach Bastian, 5257 Richwood Drive, voiced disappointment that things have changed since the meeting on October 26, 1999, and it does not seem right. John Menke, 5301 Pinewood Trail, said that finally a plan has come forward for the bus garage. If the problem of the garage is not solved, he believes rentals of the Class A office space will be difficult. He submitted a letter previously stating that small businesses are important to the quality of life in: Edina. Dan Shebuski; D.V.M., 5237 Eden Avenue, owner of the Edina Pet Hospital, is commented he has received no information regarding the possible taking of his land. He said he has been in Edina since 1975 and if the pet hospital needs to relocate more than a few thousand feet from its current location, he will not only lose his property he will lose his practice. Shirley Kiedrowski. Classic Hair Design, 5241 Eden Avenue, said she was not .aware, until the meeting of October 26, 1999, that her business may need to be relocated. She had submitted a letter voicing the same concern. HRA comments Commissioner Kelly empathized with the feeling that it seemed the wheel is being reinvented. He does not believe the Laukka partnership has brought any solution to the problem of the bus garage. Mr. Kelly gave five points to help in making a decision; 1) The Opus /Clark proposal affords greater flexibility because we know what we get up front and will work with whoever controls the bus garage property; 2) The taxpayers need to have an answer about why we would be taking less money; 3) Risk - after deliberating with his colleagues - he was told the reasonable risk was after the costs are factored in, a) the cost of issuing the instruments, b) what happens in the event of default, and c) the impact to the rating of the City. There is no question the greater risk is with G.O. Bonds rather than pay -as- you -go; d) Construction Timing /Scheduling - a realistic construction schedule is necessary; and e) Comprehensive vs. less comprehensive Development - Look forward to an attractive frontage on Vernon with E:3 the Opus /Clark team. Commissioner Kelly said he is not prepared to revisit the unanimous approval of the Opus /Clark decision of October 26, 1999. Commissioner. Faust explained the proposal is no different than what had previously been presented for the bus garage site. She voiced concern that financial gyrations might be necessary to make the plan palatable to the State of Minnesota. After attending a seminar and much deliberation, she prefers the mix of townhomes /condominiums in the Opus /Clark team proposal as well as their extensive experience..: She said her choice would remain the same as her original decision with the Opus /Clark team. Commissioner Hovland after taking the time to think about the scope of the project since October 26, 1999, he believes the least financial risk is with the Opus /Clark team. There is slightly more risk due to the size of the project and the acquisitions of additional properties. With the Laukka /Jarvis proposal, there is slightly more financial risk and slightly less developmental risk due to the use of property already owned with the exception of the TAGS property. The issue seems to be whether to take the risk with Opus /Clark to do the bigger project and meet the contingencies in the hope of getting a fully - developed piece of property or chose a more conservative route that would work but could be a timing issue. The bus garage is less important than the project itself. Following a thoughtful process, he proposes approval of the Opus /Clark proposal with the European Village feel. He voiced admiration for the Laukka /Jarvis partnership both personally and professionally. Commissioner Johnson said he felt fortunate to have been a part of tonight's presentation and concurred with what Commissioner Hovland said. When he became involved with the HRA it was apparent this was an opportunity for a great development and either of the proposers would do a tremendous job. He did a little background checking and found that the Minnetonka Opus /Clark development was done as previously mentioned. The comprehensive nature of the Opus /Clark presentation plus the assurances that they will do everything that is commercially reasonable and that the City is at a minimal risk, is reassuring, and he would support their approval. Chair Maetzold said he previously supported both Opus /Clark and Laukka /Jarvis. They are two excellent teams and at the close of the last meeting he supported the Laukka /Jarvis team. He has worked since 1988 while on the School Board to find a solution for the bus garage and we have one in hand with the Laukka /Jarvis proposal. He further likes the Laukka /Jarvis proposal because of the medium priced, residential use of the site. Chair Maetzold said he is troubled with the taking of the three properties because of, 1) the transition between the neighborhood and the commercial development, 2) the timing of the taking of the properties and 3) concern for the small businesses. He likes the experience of the Laukka /Jarvis team as well. He would vote for the Laukka /Jarvis proposal but wants the vote to be unanimous so if a motion is made for Opus /Clark he will support their proposal. W Correspondence was received from Robin Davidson, 3900 Northwoods Drive, Arden Hills, MN, thanking the City for the thoughtful consideration of their proposal. Bob and Rita Thomale, 5400 Edenmoor Street, stating their selection of developer. Arthur L. Heiam, 5205 Richwood Drive, asked that respectful concern be given to the Richmond Hills Neighborhood regarding building height, costly condemnations, rights of the small businesses, traffic, and financing. A facsimile was received directly prior -to the HRA/Council meeting from Opus /Northwest LLC and Ron Clark Construction with six key points. Commissioner Kelly made a motion to select Opus /Clark Construction as the developer of the Kunz /Lewis site and authorize the City to proceed with negotiations for a letter of intent and all appropriate documents. Commissioner Faust seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold Motion carried. CLAIMS PAID . Motion made by Commissioner Register dated October 29, 1999, and consisting Commissioner Hovland seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold Motion carried. Johnson approving the Check of one page totaling $66,467.53. There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, Chair Mae old declared the meeting adjourned at 9:08 P.M. n ^, / Executive Director 10 8 CORRESPONDENCE V A w. 1 �: ,-�! ACA �3� in dow�'1. S ov `cX 3 k2or ri t4 a� 1 vti h-esol kc as�- J'C1ti+e do �9 �.e s �► ; r.-� VV -2 vi- 6 a� C`S d� 7A L° 0. vJ a` T5-. y� 74k 74 _ 744af skald be 4�S V C cQ p GS LS 1J. 53 Patrick & Anne Marie Olk 5315 Pinewood Trail Edina, MN 55436 Home Phone (952) 922 -6393 April 11, 2000 Edina City Council /HRA 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Grandview Square and Sherwood Park We are writing to you regarding the Grandview Square development. On March 27, 2000, OPUS/Ron Clark presented their current plan to the residents of our neighborhood. We were very disappointed to find that the plan has changed to include much of Sherwood Park for residential construction. The developers are proposing four story condominiums to be constructed in Sherwood Park along Sherwood Road and ending approximately 65 feet from single family homes. Not only does this park get used extensively by our neighborhood, it is one of the reasons why we purchased our current home. In addition, the park's layout provides a nice buffer zone between our neighborhood and the existing commercial property (soon to be Grandview Square). We feel strongly that Sherwood Park should.be left alone and not included in this development. As you may already know, the Planning Commission at their March 29th meeting voted = to use the park as part of this development. The Edina Park Board which met on April 11, also does not want Sherwood Park to be developed. In addition, we do not want the park to be reconfigured to atlow the residential portion of the Grandview Square development to be closer to single family homes in our neighborhood. The park will provide a nice transition from multi - family to single family residences. The height of the proposed residential buildings adjacent to the park is especially concerning. Four story buildings towering over the entrance to our neighborhood and nearby homes, clearly isn't in the best interest of our neighborhood. We would like to see the developers create multi - family residential units less than four stories high along the park property. We understand that the layout of the site plan, which was presented to the City Council when it selected OPUS /Ron Clark for the Grandview Square development last fall, had to be revised to address the requests of the Hennepin County Library. (We have attached the original site plan and the most recent site plan for your review). We do like the latest proposed relocation of the Library/Senior Center, but not at the expense of the park land. We hope that the requests of the library and the financial goals of OPUS /Ron Clark do not outweigh the needs of current residents in this Edina neighborhood. Given the most recent site plan, we would like to have the condominiums removed from the park land and to lower the building height of the remaining residential units bordering the park. If that is not possible, we propose that the development use the original site plan (dated 10/6/99) and still limit the height of the residential units closer to the park. As Mayor Maetzold said in the spring edition of Ahout Town "Edina's infrastructure - streets, utilities, parks and public buildings - are the essential components of the foundation of our city. The quality of life in a city is defined, in part, by its infrastructure." Please do not allow Sherwood Park to be used as part of this development and please limit the height of the condominium units close to our park. This area is where we - and nearly 50 other families - have made our home for many years. Our Edina neighborhood would like to maintain its quality of life. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely ter. 4r • 'r � .�::��. -_. - �� � � 7 ,�•�; ��� � �•� l � �/1 r - A•S .•.�" : , r�..�;a ��' ->�+.` � ' _ __ _ r:, x `ca�rmr ii � J`'� L� YYY ,`± � J�' / t, • F t M4" t - i -p4 I '. EX -� �1 i��rl ei �. - ®...' ✓c �1y1- �I.;f'. 1 -xR ZIP ks a _ F P • � �I -+� 7T^: , M1_� 1 ; �q \!e R' J._ ��`+'�V� {a a.l , qx -� - 7 : t ' �!'. _ ..4 �• ., •/� ®I � .r I' .'ly .,c L, 3V 1 •1� �� . .Fe�a7'i5.��� '� � <+- .`��7x�I � .. �.r�/�- i y y� { ..� t� ( i; I V 6 , � 11 � �. t �� � r x -+a•s. "cr+a'' `S"3n"' S;s � � �.._ 1 � f � r` �?`- �.,�`�1 s. �`•� °1 / -„7 -�3r+' '•�' +► „� ' �j .y 1: ` . w. ,,,� yr, .. '..3t"�l},;;j", '/' � e / - ! r'i.,:'� - a .. -• i J �: v • ." - I ,Y•:. . yJy , r" '�_' _�;''.s'" - �r a; iR ,�•3 y ✓ Y ✓.r I •- . err -` w� _�J�. ✓V� 2, ` '� • 'i s,I.v I 104, . � w °. �'� ii � � ':1='^ tiJ , 1+r- p• i 11 .Ju P _ � '.( "'!qh ;1 "t� � J _ _ A'i.•. 'e�gj fL• ,.'k ' � � •...- ^•.+ate.•- :.a:_� ✓,� t� � c i • u�'a —��I w'»� I A%- All. "� %�� r .-�•:7.111� cWy,� a' �;. t "'yud'�w>� S d° `� I — rwa. 1 .iti t_Y ��,�:,. �,' .�� 'le �1L, � �.�� y - ` �- r f • 'P r -_ °•5 . `''rb't ) , - F -'7r Jq 1 : •'•.+;s f.(_,,,1 .-.•� ' ;a �.n,.�� , . .,KO. ,,.,,,>_, a �7 "s Fy t 4 '�,�n ,h �'�„r.� � �' a" ��.yJ . dam' �.P• <. ' '. _:ate l:�i"Wt" -'� �%�. .���1 r 4� WN �� fir+ �r � c ,,,�,.— xarr�•�� #xr� ��'-T�� � i `� �� -.._.. � �;, t \ "•'.c`c f� �91?��- '�� .-�- �,. \: i.: y�b"'?„` .C�3 1 715 .:�.�.' 1L: ?f z ;� �, w .� w ®_ . ®o: ���4�:' Fk � ", � �e: � �' .• �. �(�i" 1 i �• 'are / -='6'' C�'Irt� ma" Mwl M�,-Mlmwm P. $ School Bus o-%�:' • f s a Below �g REINHARDT April 12, 2000 Mayor Maetzold Edina City Council City of Edina 4801 W. 501h St. Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Maetzokd and City Council, I am writing to you to regarding the proposed Opus /Clark development of the Grandview area and the relocation of the TAGS Edina Gymnastics facility that currently resides at 5201 Eden Circle. You may already know that TAGS Edina has the finest gymnastic program in the Twin Cities. TAGS Edina has excellent programs for kids ages 2 to 18. The clubs Gymkids program for toddlers and preschoolers provides such a unique first gymnastic experience that no other club can mirrot My own 2 1/2 year old son Jack loves going to "nastics" each week.- TAGS Edina's competitive teams year after year consistently perform well at the state level, often placing in the top 3. The city of Edina.is lucky to have such a gem in the community. It is very disheartening to heat that the city of Edina and Opus /Clark have no plans to assist TAGS Edina in relocating in Edina Agents for Opus /Clark have indicated that TAGS Edina would only receive a minimum compensation under the provisions of condemnation laws. Gymnastics facilities have such unique building requirements that a minimum compensation would surely lead to TAGS leaving the community and possibly cause a huge gap in classes if they are forced to close or downsize due to relocation difficulties The 1600 students and their families served by TAGS Edina deserve better than this and expect more from the city in ensuring the continuity of their gymnastic programs under these special circumstances I am not a citizen of Edina I live in Plymouth and drive 20 -30 minutes past several other private gymnastic clubs and community programs on my way to TAGS Edina Why would someone go so out of their way for a once a week, 45 min. toddler gymnastic class? I do this every week because TAGS is the industry leader and the best gymnastics the Twin Cities has to offer, even for a 2 1/2 year old. I am a former gymnastic coach and have first -hand knowledge of most of the gymnastic programs in the area. I have seen.the other gymnastic options available to my family and none of them are even worthy of comparison to the programs that TAGS has to offer: Edina will dose big if TAGS is forced to relocate out of the city. No one can argue the need for redevelopment of the Grandview area It has a blighted and outdated kook and is clearly an area that has been ripe for redevelopment for many years My request is a simple. All I ask is that TAGS Edina be given reasonable and fair compensation for consideration of their special relocation needs, not the minimum compensation under the law. The city of Edina never does anything at a minimum, please do not start now. If fair and reasonable compensation is not directly within the city's control, please encourage the developer to act in a fair reasonable manner toward TAGS Thank you in advance for your thoughtful consideration of this matter. Sincerely, wn Sarah Reinhardt 4-205 %ENIUM LN N • PLYMOUTH, MN • 55442 -2643 PHONE: (763)551 -4773 • FAX: (763)553 -0549 Petition To: Edina City Council From: Richmond Hills Neighborhood Association Subject: Grandview Square Development We, the residents of the Richmond Hills neighborhood oppose ceding any portion of our existing neighborhood park, "Sherwood Park ",.to the "Grandview Square" development. It is of vital importance to us that you remember, as we do, that the City Council stated that the nark would be left intact , a commitment also made by the Ron Clark representative at the late -fall neighborhood presentation meeting! On March 27, 2000, OPUS/Ron Clark presented its site plan to the Neighborhood Association. It was a shock to observe that "Sherwood Park" was dramatically reduced in size by four -story condominiums! This is completely.unacceptable. We all believed in good faith that the developer would.honor the commitment made to preserving Sherwood Park, as indicated on the plan he created and presented to the Association and the City Council in late fall -- a plan he used to gain our approval and support. (See attached site plan and overview). A considerable number of Association neighbors pointed out at Council meetings and in letters to the Council the need for keeping the park intact. Those reasons included: 1.) The park is a y_ital part of this neighborhood. - people buy homes here because of the park. - there is a growing number of children in the area, who need and use the park. we hold neighborhood functions there. - our grandchildren enjoy it. . 2.) The park acts as a "buffer between our neighborhood and the higher - traffic, commercial area. - this need will be even greater with the increased congestion and traffic generated from the new development. Sherwood Park was initially proposed by developers as offering a good "buffer" between the existing neighborhood and a new development, indicating to us acknowledged understanding of its importance. 3.) The proposed residential buildings taking over the park area are four stories high, totaling approximately 52 feet! If allowed to be developed as proposed, they would be an overwhelming presence to all nearby housing and tower over the entrance to our existing neighborhood. 4.) The park at our entrance meets a BASIC NEED. This is a unique land - locked area and we have no practical alternative for a park. We use and enjoy Sherwood Park. We have been told throughout this matter that both the developer and the City Council would respect the needs of the citizens who live in the area. it has always been Edina's practice to carefully consider these needs. Please don't let indifference or financial appeal outweigh them.... 'I" March 29, 2000 Edina Planning Commission Edina Park Board Mr. John Keprios, Director of Parks and Recreation, City of Edina Dear Planning Commission and Park Board Members and Director Keprios; I write to request that you reject the current Opus /Clark proposed development plan, and instruct them to submit a revised plan which takes no land from Sherwood Park. Last Fall, during the process of selecting a developer for the Kunz -Lewis site, Opus Northwest and Ron Clark Construction's original proposal for their development, "Grandview Square", entirely eliminated the existing neighborhood park, Sherwood Park. Their second proposal, presented to the HRA, the City Council, and the Richmond Hills neighborhood in a neighborhood meeting, left Sherwood Park as it currently is. As you will recall, residents of Richmond Hills expressed their concern to this developer and to the City Council that land in Sherwood Park not be used in this development. Both the developer and the City Council gave assurances that existing parkland would not be used in this development. On Monday March 27, 2000, I attended a presentation by Opus /Clark at Our Lady of Grace. Their most recent proposal involves "reallocating" a very large piece of Sherwood Park to their "town square ",and siting four story condo /townhouses on the park. They claim that this will increase parkland; further they claim the neighborhood will have access to the "town square ". At best, these claims are a pleasant fiction. Opus /Clark's current proposal eliminates useful park space. This space is currently used by the neighborhood. In addition to the variety of sports, including but not limited to football, volleyball, soccer, baseball, and softball;, played or practiced by neighborhood children; that space provides a wide open play area for kite flying, Frisbee, running, etc. Such space is not readily available elsewhere in the area. The Richmond Hills'neighborhood uses the existing Sherwood Park. It is the only city park readily and safely available to children in the neighborhood. In addition to recreational activities, Sherwood Park has served as a gathering place for neighbors and a wonderful location for birthday and graduation parties (my son's university graduation party was held there). Sherwood Park has also been a buffer between the existing single family homes in Richmond Hills and the business activity of the Grandview area. I described the developer's claims regarding their use of the Park as, at best, a pleasant fiction. By changing Sherwood Park's present space, there will no longer be sufficient open space for athletic or recreational activities (other than jogging in place). Even though access is provided from the remnant of Sherwood Park to the proposed town square, I doubt children & adolescents will be welcome there —even should they desire to use that limited space. By several accounts, Mr. Clark - believes that proximity to park areas such as Sherwood Park are a detriment to his developments, or at least to their expeditious sale. He may well be correct. I suspect that means he will seek to actively discourage uses of the Park and the town square which provide this effect. Neighborhoods and neighborhood parks are important to the quality of life here in Edina. The preferences of the existing neighborhood should be a concern of the Council, the HRA, the Planning Commission, and the Park Board. Please reject the developer's proposal and clearly indicate that no current land in Sherwood Park is to be used in this development. Sincerely, f nke newood Trail Edina, MN 55436 612- 922 -2608 Petition Signature Page S+-6p�Lvx 2(p -1o4y3 Sa�9 K�cGtwood�� ��>�� MW Y' 3G Signature 0, ,Name °" . ; l Phone Number .::Address ? , C State /Province ZIP /Postal Code:' � , fishn2 U�,� m °I�210-to Q3 s2za '�c uoocQ�V. i(�Gt M� 3 Signat V. Caj�-o`s�e Ul \o� �2��4G 3���r c-sc��h� Signature kName Phone::Number 'Address i City`: r `; ' +State /Province. ,.; , :ZIP /PostclGotle ?krlwaod fly. Ed koc)" MOJ 1a543c0 AIC 1 �� G�isT9���0 &off. AAA.) �3Cv Signature , � / , S� p �G/ D D Signature r Nr -t Petition Signature Page ;Name S3 /S CATra.l a E K MAJ -� -- / 3 (o ` 114r,c,k 0(K �Zi -b353 SigAat� O Nariie PFone t+lumber Address - C(ty <<- State /Province;, , ZIP /Postal Code'. Q� q)-'2 -6393 nhe �11q��e k S31S R yp, ,u ciod Tra,' l C-'O( l'Aa- j'�jlj SS q 3 Co Si n� Name Phone Number Address` ° _= Clty : : ;` Stcte /Province; ZIP /Postcl`Code ". rG M/u 3 [. Signature 6teyNumb c:e ZIP Postal Code Name = Phone . , � Ct Vic;+ n (v Ste) 36 Wic hwad '-. 04'.hci /lip Signature Name Phone Number. Address;: =: Clt State Province, ZIP Postal Code SA3q {e, c 4c, o �- L c'iz� � N S .j-y2 Co 6 Petition Signature Page .Name n, OU mbef�jAddrqssA,,`.- � ,Zlp/po tal.Code &)!R 7 ZkOtROVO "M06- EJ>IAA A4 A) ss 416. Signature 60%-g Name; Phone Number -,,,'-,,,,Address OX State/Province,,�' ZIP /Postal Code �/ SGuf« qZ,oR2 L59'09 Signature Foll, Name Phone Number Address• State/Province,^.,", Code City -,ZIP/Postal // L-31 u - pl-_- /0/ I-It AJ Si t r Name on ... ... LirtrosTai 9-oue 'Ph eNumber,""Add Sig�� t Signature /1//L- 0_---2?* >�..:Zl P /Postal -C Dal, Petition Signature Page Sig re w Z • �- a - 44 q s��� � K, 61,-Jo 0 '• S (h-h. S 5 T Name Phone Number° Address City . St 64/ F6 vince . ZIP /.Postal Code ; Signature g a q- a 3 a 2l Phone Number" ,;Address ,..,.., `.;.Cff fy <Y ,- St6 #e %Province ;ZIP /Po §tdI Code, :' • ?Y. f- �� �%�? Signatur�"�" Name ..- Phone Number <,-A ddr 6 iw P %Postal Code 'OPI&A,�� Signature Name - Phone Number:Aaaress ��Ty :�raie�rrv�u�c�r. ��,rvau..v.+QT; Sign ,Mure 56 • Lh) Name o e Nurpfker `Address >. City -`<,r .. > t ;State /Province- = ZIP /Postdl':Code Signature Petition Signature Page -ZIP/Postal Code..; Siaturae"All -02 -7-S-- any 10o*,000;6 X)I 5d q,3� m Phone b N 14 m e f ':Address;,. ZIP Postal Code, Si : ginatu le' 21 PV/ 's Nn a 7� �'P h "I X-t':' S,; :cIt v State/Pro Ince ZIP/Postal Cocle'�'. -,/ Pe-oaems. - Signature k W woo C� DP-4 P? Am Jj Cf -3 Ndme V: �,:�,:State/Prov nce ��.`,r.,ZIP/Posfal Code ".Pho'no-Number... er"MAddres mature ,5 -3 P� pAlyl -TS C13 � Petition Signature Page Signature Name Phone Number Address Cify Sfafe /Pro vlrice ZIP %Postal Code;;= Signature Name Phone Number "Address City SfcteyProvince . ZIP /Postal.Code Signature Co Nome Phone Number Address " City cte /Pro ZIP %Pos d Sf vtnde taI a .-. Signature Petition Signature Page le 72- e Pr S'-SlqW.? -6/ Signature � ' S d resi C I SfijfQPj6�lnc W ZIF/ SidU. Cig Signature :Phbh6 CRVEORNV ZIPIP6stat.codw Signature -7 i W m. ! A N ZIP N dfi e �./ � V tiF� . Signaturg-,-e-o �- / —7,4 S a, 3 �a� `�(00 � -�J7 Signature IAN Signature iffllll-�Iv —JI"ON, i7MINI, �RMMMOIIWM Petition Signature Page 0a h i ii�l 'ZoNif �f OMMORM n (.aOicreek % V,,,LA, Sig,pature -7Cw5 j�&Olq } Phbhi Nu-Mbif;' AddiiW.-' cni�OPNAI;QM? St6f6/Pf 1h6�11PIP6061 Cb-di,-%- e, a, ev -t, 6q E8 � o c� Signature Signature I Signature • 'ddli 1.6 Q. 0.4 ,14d 604umbii-,'. A 6 divinkOwIlp st (c Signature ..,. tqi Ifs Petition Signature Page ,, _��` ��•'� �� 4'•� f< Phone Number'��' Address• ^�� • � = ����1�� ''���- �� °���City�:k��� � }- °�� - � 5-232 Xl�hOOOd CWiJlk-- 1"))AJ Signature, Z Signature P In id.belk 1-71�jo me, Signature _ _ , Signature % )ailnu. SW3�' l3aa -1� Ali.�"�Y°�G� rJIZ`7J /C�L/lwod 1� r%A) Signature � vK�nc Y.' "� j;.`'` s1t��s:+«�. S��A:i�': •t1'} -:i •:. -•ra r :, _ •.w�'r ..Y,,... ;�'i� .{ r: ,.: � :,�. .__•.: :_ :. .:.... ��. �.:.:. .., -.:�.. ,..:;.._,.��:.'<.�` -tc::, ON, �1• ,� �f "�.nol •. d. `z'i — -�l�12 h. w t,✓ •D. o .tv.+ �. t. .:c.- "3a. -,z ..(:� .'}•: "iC '.,,t. :l. 'Q .3•��Il,;.aL °1.. a.., .. .y�i "yiE y�i�::• lti" S M+e�'i` {v` 2,v Y vw,lFµ N3 i`r.'�•r. �'•e�'•i•r�.r,.wn r'.... Z�r.{J,.:•. {�q 1 ,gip. y�ie� r +k S�uS'tXa r k Y� a 1 � 1 I. % Petition Signature Page " l NU . Name - ',---) ' C K6 i mbi d d ei s k ' me I P C d d e. pa E 14 a � ff -Z Signature in to - ygj4yA 'g,gg gl' eyt e o, Signature ddreW-'-,�--'j', 4'; Mk M 'y citVff Signature tn S U h6fii Number„ '''�Add4iif, 0 a Name 6C,5 VI 0- C 0 rl W r9lb 15 V-111hWOOd Or. iEdlnez, M 5543U Signature 'Cify '`-Phone Number �x Address t,� 4 s, x., „lit : e:---.�.,t�,..-�T����,.""..i�.,.�,V.�";,.,..""",.�,��-z,��;,",!,,-�.�-,;.; (�,O\ I Signature ;P, Phone' UR R, Signature Is Fall', I May 12, 2000 Mayor Dennis Maetzold Council. Members Nan Faust, James Hovland, Scott Johnson, and Michael Kelley. Dear Mayor and Council Members; I write again to request that you reject the current Opus /Clark proposed development plan, and instruct them to submit a revised plan which takes no land from Sherwood Park. As you are aware, the developers requested a continuance from the originally scheduled meeting of April 18, 2000 in order to revise their plan. I had the opportunity to view their plan on May 11, 2000. They continue to propose a plan which uses land currently in Sherwood Park. They have not changed the height or basic configuration of the residential units closest to the existing homes in the neighborhood, and they have not changed the traffic pattern. I look forward to speaking with you at the meeting on May 16, 2000 as you discuss the Overall Development Plan Approval and Preliminary Rezoning for the "Kunz- Lewis" property. I am supplementing my previous letters of March 29 and April 12, 2000 with additional comments toward the same purpose —no loss of land or change in boundaries to the current Sherwood Park. * The "new, revised" plan continues to call for the use of (by the developers' figures) .33 acres of Sherwood Park. This is over 21% of the Park's total area, and. at least 35% of the flat open play area on the west side of the Park. • The developers continue to claim that Sherwood Park was intended to be part of the overall development from the beginning. • Despite assurances given to Council Members Hovland and Faust on 11/1/99 by Ron Clark that there were no contingencies affecting the developers ability to proceed with the development and that residential building height issues could be addressed, the developer now claims that building codes require construction changes over four stories —so height adjustments cannot economically be made. • Options do appear available to the developer: 1) Reduce "footprint" area of the office building and increase its height — permitting movement of the westernmost residential unit to the eastern complex (moving it out of the park). 2) Increase height of office complex and reduce number of residential units. 3) Move the secondary entrance /exit from Sherwood Road to under the raised deck parking area associated with the office complex — permits a shift in residential units further from the neighborhood. 4) Rethink and/or renegotiate the library's participation in the development. We are aware that TIF cannot subsidize a new City Hall —but I suspect the combined remodeling costs in the current plan (I also assume not TIF eligible) could be spent building a new City Hall on top of the Senior Center. I support the development of the Kunz Lewis site. I have no serious problems with the mixed -use development. But, I ask you please do not require the existing neighborhood to pay a disproportionate price for a development which benefits the entire City. I note that on May 16, 2000 you will also be considering a tax referendum proposal for increasing recreational facilities and City Park improvements. Ordinarily, I would be a strong advocate for this proposal. However, I find myself in the extraordinary position in which I cannot reconcile supporting a proposal to increase my taxes for.Parks and recreational facilities when the City Park across the street from my home may be reduced in size to accommodate a private developer. Please reject the current Opus /Clark redevelopment plan. Do not permit the developer to use any of the existing land in Sherwood Park for the development— either for construction of buildings or for landscape buffer. Delay approval of this redevelopment and rezoning until both the land use issues and design issues are clear. Please know the design and dimensions of the proposed buildings prior to approval. Thank you for your consideration. S ohm Menke 5301 Pinewood Trail Edina, MN 55436 612 - 922 -2608 JubgE rtrlxxth CIL ( knu xthzon 642.5 ;NnMrxxt pi& �Ivab April 27, 2000 Craig Larsen City Planner Edina City Offices 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Hughes: I live at 6425 Indian Hills Road and have four adopted young boys from Siberia. Each of these boys is presently enrolled in the Thompson Academy of Gymnastics (TAGS) in the Grandview are 'Of course, you know that it is scheduled for removal because of the Opus /Clark project. I have been advised that as a result of the project, TAGS have been offered minimum compensation and assistance in relocating in Edina. I regret this. Eminent domain is a device that should be used sparingly and with great caution. When it is exercised, it should be done for the public good. A finding of the best and highest use of property must necessarily, it seems to me, include the community as ,.a whole and allow for pecuniary and non - pecuniary values. Not 'everything we do can be discreetly measured by tax revenues or income. In this case, the Academy has been especially important to Edina residents (any many others) as a local resource for athletic endeavor of a first -class nature. In our own case, my boys have greatly benefited from the individual attention they receive there. The teachers offer support and guidance on an individual basis, and this has helped them develop physically and. emotionally. Hopefully an institution of such character can be accommodated in our city's landscape. April 27, 2000 Page Two I hope you will address Julia and' Greg Aretz's concerns in future directions to Opus as these plans unfold. The entire project ultimately rests in your power to decide it fairly and productively for our community. I�have every confidence you will do so. cc: Julia and Greg Aretz h n 5 ayS rru 3M Pollution Prevention Pays Managing for a Better,Environment P®� ®n It has been brought to our attention that the City of Edina is considering a proposal to use part of Sherwood Park in the Richmond Hills neighborhood for a commercial condo /office budding development. We strongly support leaving the park intact and oppose the taking of any Edina .park land for other uses. Our parks are valuable and necessary resources to our community. Name Signature Zip Code �eiqca- z. I 01 3. 5. UP, aMMU-27M 7. i + 9. II .rt Y, joh, b') 43'1 55836, I v� Sdwfl� 62°1 5s4-3q S5y? SSH3 S43G S-SqZy s5y-! i 7 POINOR It has been brought to our attention that the City of Edina is considering a proposal to use part of Sherwood Park in the Richmond Hills neighborhood for a commercial condo /office budding development. We strongly support leaving the park intact and oppose the taking of any Edina park land for other uses. Our parks are valuable and necessary resources to our community. Name Signature Zip Code 6. - Adam 3 i Ynoso n Ate' sa k7- 645 3 7. v e �- Arclse, / � l/�� S$ C.( 3-e-) 8. 9. It 1: 13. 14., 15. 16. 17, 18. 19. ..It /1_ w w _ A ..A _ ^A-► - - pennon It has been brought to our attention that the City of Edina is considering a proposal to use part of Sherwood Park in the Richmond Hills neighborhood for a commercial condo /office budding development. We strongly support leaving the park intact and oppose the taking of any Edina park land for other uses. Our parks are valuable and necessary resources to our community. 3. n Y Yt r .I 2 5 .;- 4.16S W Z LAS fl-ovh 5 6 7 8 MIC WWWAW .I 1!l ! if a 1 1M&A L111a. M � G[L. 1. 1 1 1 17 18 19 i MINOR It has been brought to our attention that the City of Edina is considering a proposal to use part of Sherwood Park in the Richmond Hills neighborhood for a commercial condo/office building development. We strongly support leaving the park intact and oppose the taking of any Edina park land for other uses. Our parks are valuable and necessary resources to our community, Name Signature Zip Code 15. � O l2Sa N 1�T?�li -� r 3 G 3. SS 4. �ov�,i�t _ I 5. AA K f, �l��c S54 9 6. f-p b- LvNp 7. ,��KK 8. . Rzitrr-zo,1\ FBI Cp 12. S5Y3G 14.M Ike 15. � O l2Sa N 1�T?�li -� 4 �a 16. (,Ul '.�M'` A1/1��`'y' 17. 19. C'1nr.r5 Qivnt{M� Petition It has been brought to our attention that the City of Edina is considering a proposal to use part of Sherwood Park in the Richmond Hills neighborhood for a commercial condo /office budding development. We strongly support leaving the park intact and oppose the taking of any Edina park land for other uses. Our parks are valuable and necessary resources to our community. Name Signature Zip Code 1 • LIZ Cuts k-2a,11 Cv 2. LGAOJ l SS 4 bet 3. ►.1 • I 41 V 18 19. LANDSCAPE PLAN 0 20 40 80 120 160 N w w O O i Z w 0 w y SHERWOOD ROAD GARAGE _ ENTRY SITE - ENTRY CITY LARK EXISTING SHERWOOD RESIDENTIAL PARK 11tF-M 7!"R�Lc IN] 4 STORY RESIDENTIAL 172 UNITS PARKING BELOW I/ 'E BOOK DROP -OFF C ITY \ 0 \ D 2 STORY LIBRARY/ RY/ \ SENIOR CENTER 40,000 G.S.F. / /�T SITE \ f ENTRY CI CITY TY �) _ TWO WAY ROAD / D I n n i i CLARK 4 STORY RESIDENTIAL NURP POND OPUS 4 STORY OFFICE BUILDING 88,000 RSF 11IM9 a1=111ni-mmki PUMP o \`i yG 190 9 ZJTTT- H Htp PARKING- 2 LEVELS 355 STALLS NURP POND SOO LINE RAILROAD Grandview Square (Site Allocation) Edina, MN 05 -11 -00 Gross Site Area City: Sherwood Park 66,498 SF Plaza 27,409 SF Library/Sen. Cnter 83,418 SF Two Way Road 46,411 SF Clark: Residential 230,268 SF Opus: Office Building 148,300 SF TOTAL 602,304 SF 13.8 ACRES Ownership Percentages M (Excluding wo Way Road, Park, and Plaza) Library/ Senior Center 18.1% Residential 49.8% Office 32.3% Total 461,986 SF- 100.0% 00 50 100 200 1 OPUS. A Development of Opus Northwest LLC SITE PLAN ! = Park To Remain r Area 1.22 acre I r I i r I I I r ' I r ' I I ' I r ' I' r ' ----------------- - - - - -- Added Greenspace Area .26 acre X mama...., Redeveloped Park Area .33 acre do � rr ILLI Grandview Square Park Area Analysis Edina, Minnesota 05 -11 -00 Existing Park 1.55 acre A. Concept 3 -15 -00 Park/Greenspace 1.11 acre Town- .63 acre Total Area 1.74 acre B. Concept 4 -11 -00 Park/Greenspace 1.15 acre Town Square .6-3-acre Toatal Area 1.78 acre C. Concept 5 -11 -00 Park/Greenspace 1.48 acre Town Square .63 acre Toatal Area 2.11 acres so 30 60 120 0 PUS A Development of Opus Northwest LLC Grandview Square /Park Area Analysis Screening New Play Area Shelter/ Pump House I M, Open i\ e`er �4i'1 Play 13. A. w : � 4'a.R 15 � s•��� '• : Town Square Boulevards - 6' wide min. Entry Monuments Crosswalk - Special Paving Medians w /Overstory Deciduous, Shrubs, and Ground Covers Concrete Sidewalk - 6' wide min. Boulevard Infill Trees �4►i� 5>• %t!.`��In� .. 1144' .�.�` �r '�4 •wr \� �c.+ r %,, \ .,5� `K- !,`. � �- �� � lE�.l�r •/ .. � �'�' _: %Y / . PIS ��14\. .. i�`� `�w;: \ <�w :••:i \\� � X15:- - LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN PRELIMINARY PLANT UST 0lCLI.WS_tM!eft0!1r �d'e IV_(al %"•(MI•QgUMA,a1r�L•ll {�1V!(p4,o_+!II .�'1 Y.'(al - j•RCVAOf WYq MIIWOI AWNS ^.rfl1B/�tid1011M C0`Rq -. _- •'�— •([1u.nl -- sWrA wArtt 04I2•.nl.4 SAK! �. A•)lWLtl!l tx.(C caouoo vwo r..pp4 OoGwoOO Qa014Yn.�Ct- bOr(nwn Wo•IAI •!a os<rI rlose000 fu(Ow (!v(.. wow rlydt (vro SV"a _. •uw cow "a _ .IRNN nAI .V4iMA,1 ,V! +LLlWA,1v SO1"1RlOw, m111UU,nu1000'NQ00 ANrin v.n COMO•YO Y -:�° (��' OAX —0A. vnnl o4. scmw.,,y uuwv. :nl.•urso wo r.l! mur ovr.•, rlovnaoo •u.roo vrwlwr+ n ACAo4svu A lum ao aw c ,xu my oNo—,l claw,wv V.aew.. eadoorll su+uc A ISM — o'N ASTXW 'iUA ' V. rMowt W —ocvs, J(n� w,yo /Yp•gy1yA1C4t .IATP4 INI 4,MIIEO W.[M A" SIaIM •O1le vARpN o«.rs aaw(uwc tOwoll nalns u.c NI`A v •' -IMEW N( CO•.IM•11•' �0 OPUS,! OPUS Nchilsels k Engimm. 'nc 10150 on A00 d 'Ntsl IfmnCOnta, Ynn4solo 55315 612-656-4444 Fos 612- 656 -4529 �omuo ..4, (.1.y, •l.el SM epMtree Wer•laeny .0rl. 4fn. n �( IM 51.1• If •n•.stn " o.I• vls,aa n.y �,. D:Ai ILGRE\ SI I ARDLOIV �I IfC �p \iL�ll'[ �OIfTN Vr\ [1roJ�. Y :1101 1. M'1300 s QOI VYpI Y.YO, 3 13144 Kla. L10.00 alas .r.va rr+, Irn �.�•+ x an, wl•a� • tom• a•ca�.u.( �, M !• nM a. MN •VO.I ..elr. c•nrrr O 091 M .qU narw• %% OPUS, crnIaS.W. uc. :0.150 b(. Led .N 11•..1,+4 JI AW RI -W-au ,a 111. 011 -IRO ;RANDVIEW SQUARE sca :OINA. MN V•n 11 LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN am um ! �i yt1NG1 RAsTH ` � tZ�f CJC- {�It1Ps'1� C^*I'-H(�`�-7 � � � .�' ��- �"l�i,y,•�- .u��w.sl��\ `.. i� '.. i� "i �'• T 7�' � (/'CI"�f`, �vvj ,/ '���, �. \\ \ ;+•, 305 ,_v Grandview Squar�-;� Development Edina, MN 11/22/99 _,r North f"�irrw�u�r�► 4 OPUS. Ron Clark Construction _ _ _x•_, m Opus Architects and Engineers, Inc Concept Site Plan Residential a� as N L. 0 0 E d W Sherwood Road Landscape Buffer Existing Park Trail Connection Residential a Entry Ve�hon q �en4e Amoco as �O Super America Q� Line of imp Below Car Wash Edina Schools Bus Garage Grandview Square Edina, MN 10 -06 -99 00 50 100 200 Corsi —von S Design • 1 OPUS A Development of Opus Northwest SITE PLAN Grandview Square Edina, MN 08 -27 -99 aLrMl...rMMM�= 0 50 100 200 O PUS. �.. ""^i0g0n8Oei1gn A Development of Opus Northwest SITE PLAN M B.C. HART C. PABYANSKE >RK W. WESTRA :REMIAH J. KEARNEY OENNIS J. TROOIEN SCOTT LLOYD ANOU40N PAUL L RATELLE GREGORY T. SPALJ OEAN B. THOMSON GARY C. EIDSON KYLE E HART JUDITH E. KROW STEPHEN A. MELCHER RICHARD G. JENSEN THOMAS J. T000 FABYANSKE, WESTRA 8c. HART A PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION : ..CHARLES 0. CARkNtER,'III SUITE 1100 , PATRICK W. NOAKER JOOELYN L; KNOLL . 920 SECOND AVENUE SOUTH "SYEVENC.'COx BRIAN L. WILLIAMS MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402 JULIE A. DOHERTY JAYNE 9. GARDNER TELEPHONE 612 - 338.0115 AARON A. DEAN TELECOPIER 612336 -3857. CARA O. HELPER ARLENP D. ANDERSON - DAVID A MEYFA .. TIEN T. CAI . DANIEL J. MCGARRY FREDERICK H. LADNER DERECK R. BROWER May 16, 2000 EMAIL GCEIOSONdMINNLAW.COM ' DIRECT. (612) 33"502 vn I -Lay lug 4UVV1 Inc scope or Lne Vranavlew,quare development being proposed by the Opus/Ron Clark development team is. scheduled for a hearing before.the Edina City Council. The undersigned represents a number of the residents. who live. in the neighborhood and who are greatly concerned that the current version of the development includes p art oft the local park. They have asked me to express their concerns via this correspondence. The Edina City Council has always taken great pride in its park system. It has viewed that system as a treasure, and the system is publicly touted as one of the virtues, of living in . Edina. The City has historically acted to preserve and enhance its park system..Bydevouring . a portion of the current park, the Grandview Square development proposal would result in''a course of action which is entirely inconsistent with Edina's historical posture about its. park system. If the City chooses to allow use of the park for this for -profit development;.the: City .. . would be abandoning its longstanding tradition that, parks are sacred.and should, be :preserved from generation to generation. The local residents will.rightly feel, betrayed :.` . Just as the City has touted its park system as a whole; the residents believe that this. park is a valuable asset in their neighborhood. It is an important.. reason why many of. them.. initially chose to live in this neighborhood. 'Me loss.of part of the parkin conjunction with the resulting encroachment of this high density development on the'single .family. neighborhood will result in lost values to the homes which are presently there. This loss is unfair, and an unreasonable hardship for the neighborhood residents. N:\PL \GCB \l 9314093.wpd The Honorable Dennis F. Maetzold May 16, 2000 Page 2 If the City Council approves Grandview Square without preserving the'park. rr its present:. configuration, the City will have failed. to consider the. loss of. property',values Ao, these homeowners. That action would be arbitrary and capricious. vis -a -vis the :rights of the local residents relative to the park and the proposed development.. The local. residents. are not. opposed to a development outside the ark boundaries.. The sim I do not want an off: the; PP P P_ y: park replaced or exchanged with part of that development. Let's find some other way to achieve a thoughtful project, while "doing the right thing" — preserving the park! Thank you in advance for your thoughtful reflection on my clients' position. . Very truly yours, C• r� C��nr� . Gary C. Eidson GCEJcj COUNCIL CHECK ,,- SISTER 10 -MAY -2000 (1, 9) page 1 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 13541 05/16/00 $2,551.14 BRW INC. ARCHITECT FEES 267 -0887 CENTENNIAL LAX PRO FEE ARCH /E 05/16/00 $3,729.78 BRW INC. ARCHITECT FEES 515 -0021 CENTENNIAL LAK PRO FEE ARCH /E < *> $6,280.92* 13542 05/16/00 $829.50 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP LEGAL FEES 770100 CENTENNIAL LAK PRO FEES LEG /S 05/16/00 $16,571.67 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP LEGAL FEES 770100 GRANDVIEW PRO FEES LEG /S < *> $17,401.17* 13543 05/16/00 $517,579.50 THOMAS & SONS CONSTRUCTI TOTAL PARTIAL PAYMENT 051600 CENTENNIAL LAK PARKS < *> $517,579.50* $541,261.59* COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY 10 -MAY -2000 (13:53) page 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ FUND # 01 HOUSING & REDEVELOP AUTHOR $541,261.59 $541,261.59* • 'NCORPOPA��O/ 1888 PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, public works services provided in our community are an integral part of our citizens' everyday lives; and . WHEREAS, the support of an understanding and informed citizenry is vital to the efficient operation of public works systems and programs such as water, sewers, streets and highways and public buildings; and WHEREAS, the health, safety and comfort of this community greatly depends on these facilities and services; and WHEREAS, the quality and effectiveness of these facilities, as well as their planning, design and construction, is vitally dependent on the efforts and skill of public works officials; and WHEREAS, the efficiency of the qualified and dedicated personnel who staff public works departments is materially influenced by the people's attitude and understanding of the importance of the work they perform; and WHEREAS, the City of Edina Public Works staff has planned an Open House for 4 -7 p.m. Thursday, May 18 at the Public Works Building, to educate the public, NOW, THEREFORE, I, Dennis F. Maetzold, Mayor of the City of Edina, do hereby proclaim the following week of May 21 -27 as NATIONAL PUBLIC WORKS WEEK in the City of Edina and I call upon all citizens and civic organizations to acquaint themselves with the issues- involved in providing our public works and to recognize the contributions that public works officials make every day to our health, safety, comfort and quality of life. Dated: May 16, 2000 Dennis F. Maetzold, Mayor MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL MAY 2, 2000 - 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, and Mayor Maetzold. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Johnson and seconded by Member Hovland approving the Council Consent Agenda as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETINGS OF APRIL 18, 2000, AND BOARD OF REVIEW OF APRIL 18, 2000, APPROVED Motion made by Member Johnson and seconded by Member Hovland approving the Minutes of the Regular Meetings of April 18, 2000, and Board of Review of April 18, 2000. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. RESOLUTION 2000 -52 ADOPTED ORDERING STREET REHABILITATION PROTECT IMPROVEMENT A -189 - SCHOOL ROAD RUTH DRIVE AND WEST 59th STREET Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Presentation by Engineer Assistant Engineer Houle reviewed the proposed project. He explained the streets had been constructed in 1956 and have reached the end of their useful life. Mr. Houle said that normal seal coat maintenance had been performed on the street. The streets have numerous small block cracks and a large amount of alligator cracking. When streets in this condition are not rehabilitated, water seeps into the cracks to the sub -grade requiring total reconstruction that is more costly. Mr. Houle said the proposed improvement would replace the pavement and include some minor curb and gutter replacement. He added that, no utility work is necessary in this area. Mr. Houle stated the total project cost was estimated at $120,000 and included construction, engineering, clerical, and finance charges. The project would be paid for through an area special assessment of the benefited properties on School Road, Ruth Drive, and West 59th Street. The City would pay two area assessments for its water tower property and Edina Schools would -pay 24-area-assessments-for Concord - Elementary School. Estimated area assessments - would -be $2,300.00 spread over ten years. Mr. Houle reviewed local roadway reconstruction costs from five previous projects that ranged from $1,850 per lot to $4,500 per lot. He recommended the Council order the project, take bids June 1, 2000, award the contract June 6, 2000, construct the project during the summer, and hold the special assessment hearing in the fall. Page 1 Minutes/Edina Ci!y Council/Mgy 2, 2000 Public Comment Steven Merta, 4809 West 59th Street, stated that he was one of three homeowners in attendance from West 59th Street, who feel their street is smooth and pot hole free. They do not want the improvement project ordered. Mr. Merta asked the Council to eliminate West 59th Street from the project. Mr. Houle reiterated that the street contains many large block cracks and alligator cracking. If these are not repaired water will seep into the cracks and damage the sub -grade causing more costly repair in the future. Mr. Merta and his neighbor, Mr. Larson submitted photographs to the Council of West 59th Street. Mayor Maetzold commented that the alligator and block cracks were evident in the pictures. William Larson, 4805 West 5911, Street, agreed with Mr. Merta. Mr. Larson added that a few years ago seal coating was done and he suggested that this be done again. He added that in his opinion West 59th Street was in the same or better condition than many city streets. Mr. Larson agreed that School Road was in need of repair, however, he asked the Council to remove West 59th Street from the project. Bev Iacono, 4813 West 5911, Street, agreed with her neighbors and urged the Council to postpone any work until their road really needs it. Mayor Maetzold asked staff to comment on the neighbors' objections. Mr. Houle reviewed a pavement performance curve, explaining that if streets are let go too long, the sub grade of the road bed erodes causing a much more costly repair. He added that including West 59th Street and Ruth Drive in the School Road project brings residents of those small streets a less costly rehabilitation than doing either street alone in the future. Member Johnson said that in his opinion, if the residents did not want their street repaired, then let them wait. Member Kelly agreed with Member Johnson. Member Hovland stated that he was concerned with maintaining the City's infrastructure. He said that he believed the Council needed to look out for the interests of the City. Member Hovland suggested that keeping Edina streets at a certain standard, adds value to the entire city . and helps in maintaining property values overall. Member Kelly suggested the project be ordered, but it should be bid using an alternate without West 59th Street. Manager Hughes suggested that if West 591h Street were removed, Ruth Drive should also be bid as an alternate. Member Hovland made a motion to close the public hearing, seconded by Member Johnson. Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold Motion carried. Member Kelly introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2000-52 ORDERING STREET REHABILITATION IMPROVEMENT NO. A -189 SCHOOL ROAD, RUTH DRIVE & WEST 59TH STREET Page 2 Minutes/Edina City Council/May 2, 2000 WHEREAS, the Edina City Council on the 4th of April, 2000, fixed a date for a Council hearing on the proposed street reconstruction, Improvement No. A -189; and WHEREAS, ten days' mailed notice and two weeks' published notice of the hearing was given, and the hearing was held thereon on the 2nd day of May, 2000, for Improvement No. A -189 resurfacing School Road from West 60th Street to Concord Avenue, Ruth Drive, and West 59th Street, at which time all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Council has duly considered the views of all persons interested, and being fully advised of the pertinent facts, does hereby determine to proceed with the construction of said improvement, including "all proceedings which may be necessary in eminent domain for the acquisition of necessary easements and rights hereby designated and shall be referred to in all subsequent proceedings as Improvement Project No. A -189 resurfacing School Road from West 60th Street to Concord Avenue, Ruth Drive, and West 59th Street. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED Improvement Project No. A -189 resurfacing School Road from West 60th Street to Concord Avenue, Ruth Drive, and West 59th Street is hereby ordered as proposed, pending further review of the Ruth Drive and West 59th Street portion of the improvement, after bids are received. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Engineer is hereby designated as the engineer for this improvement. The engineer shall cause plans and specifications to be prepared for the making of such improvement. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Engineer is hereby authorized to advertise for bids and receive same for the aforementioned improvements, noting that alternate bids are to be received showing West 59th Street and Ruth Drive separately from School Road. Passed and adopted this 2nd day of May, 2000. Member Hovland seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold Motion carried. RESOLUTION 2000 -53 ADOPTED APPROVING FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR FAIRVIEW SOUTHDALE HOSPITAL (6401 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH) BUILDING EXPANSION AND PARKING RAMP AND RESOLUTION 2000 -54 ADOPTED APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PARKING STRUCTURE Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Planner Larsen said that after the April 4, 2000, public hearing Fairview Hospital responded to the concerns raised by the Council by: Page 3 Minutes/Edina City Council/May 2, 2000 • BRW, Inc. conducted a.m. traffic counts in order to compare them to the p.m. counts .used for their original study. The counts demonstrated that p.m. counts were higher than a.m. counts and were appropriate to use for the study. • Submitted a revised landscaping plan illustrating additional and larger stock than what had been offered in writing at the April 4, 2000, meeting. • Project architects have done additional work on design and materials for the proposed ramp. • Two phases for road improvements. ♦ Phase 1 would be a widening of Drew Avenue to accommodate three traffic lanes and a six -foot sidewalk on the west side of the street between 65th and 66th Street. The sidewalk would be pavers to tie into the 66th Street sidewalk. Southdale Medical's owners have agreed to grant the necessary sidewalk easement. Funding for Phase 1 would be 100% through special assessment to the hospital, Southdale Medical, and the medical office building at 6363 France Avenue. The assessment would be allocated on a floor area basis. The estimated project cost is $155,000.00 ♦ Phase 2 would be the reconstruction of West 6511, Street west of France Avenue and the reconstruction of the intersection of Valley View Road and West 65th Street. The project. would include an expansion of the ramp, addition of signals, reconstruction of the intersection and rehabilitation of the pavement. The West 65th portion of the improvement is not a municipal state aid street so it would be funded by a 100% assessment. This portion of the project is estimated at $194,000. The remainder of proposed improvements are estimated at $950,000.00 with approximately $712,500.00 eligible for state aid funding leaving an additional $237,500.00 to be assessed. The hospital, Southdale Medical, the medical office building at 6363 France Avenue, and all properties abutting West 65th Street between France Avenue and Valley View Road would be included in the assessment area for this improvement. • Fairview Southdale Hospital and the owner of the medical office building at 7373 France Avenue have agreed, to waive their right of appeal for any special assessment that does not exceed the Engineer's estimate, retaining the right to appeal any portion of an assessment exceeding the same. Member Johnson asked why only the hospital was used . in calculating the floor area, not the parking structure. Mr. Hughes explained that the City views the parking structure as an accessory building to the hospital. For this reason the parking structure was not used in calculating the special assessments the hospital would be responsible for. Mr. Larsen reviewed the suggested conditions for approval of both the Final Development Plan and the Conditional Use Permit as follows: Final Development Plan Conditions: 1. Watershed District Permits. 2. Landscaping Plan dated, 4/20/00 and bond. 3. Exterior materials shall be brick, marble and glass matching materials on hospital. Page 4 Minutes/Edina City Council/May 2, 2000 . 4. Agreement by hospital and the owners of 6363 France Avenue to waive their right of appeal of special assessments for off -site improvements subject to term of the agreement signed by all parties and on file at City Hall. Conditional Use Permit Conditions: 1. Design and materials detailed on ramp plan as presented May 2, 2000 to City Council. 2. Landscaping Plan dated, 4/20/00 and bond. 3. All lighting in parking structure and on the site containing the .structure shall be shaded so as to concentrate illumination on -site and within the structure. 4. No signage on the skyway. Proponent Presentation Richard Dahl, BBR Architects, reviewed the revised plans, using graphics and actual samples W of the materials intended for use in the' ramp. Mr. Dahl explained the stair tower curtain wall will be clear anodized aluminum and green tinted glazing. The elevator tower will be brick, matching the hospital. This will be covered by a clear anodized aluminum fascia and soffit. The ramp will consist of poured in place concrete walls with-sand textured acrylic coating. The wall adjacent to the brick elevator tower and curtain wall will be light taupe with the span of the building a combination-of light and dark taupe. The columns will be cast in place concrete painted a dark earth tone. Mr. Dahl also reviewed the proposed landscaping and berm. Member Faust expressed her disappointment with the design as proposed. She stated she had specifically asked that the parking structure design complement the existing and proposed hospital. Member Faust stated that in her opinion the designers had not done as requested. Member Hovland and Mayor Maetzold disagreed with Member Faust. They stated that in their opinions and experience the proposed design was a good attempt at blending the new hospital addition and ramp with existing buildings and designs. Member Kelly stated in his opinion the hospital proposal is an over building of the site and he still would have liked to seen a more comprehensive study of the area before proceeding. However, he believes that the hospital is a good citizen and good for the community. Member Hovland introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION 2000 -53 APPROVING FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that the Final Development Plan revision dated May 2, 2000, for Fairview Southdale Medical Center, Fairview Health Services, a Minnesota - .nonprofit_ corporation, located at 6401 France Avenue presented at the regular meeting of the City Council on May 2, 2000, be and 'is hereby approved conditioned upon: 1. Watershed District Permits. 2. Landscaping Plan dated, 4/20/00 and bond. 3. Exterior materials shall be brick, marble and glass matching materials on hospital. 4. Agreement by hospital and the owners of 6363 France. Avenue to waive their right of appeal of special assessments for off -site improvements subject to terms of the agreement signed by all parties and on file at City Hall. Member Johnson seconded the motion. Page 5 Minutes/Edina City Council/May 2, 2000 Rollcall: Ayes: Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold Nay: Faust Motion carried. Member Johnson made a motion introducing the following resolution and moving its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2000-54 GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO FAIRVIEW HEALTH SERVICES PARKING STRUCTURE WHEREAS, the procedural requirements of Code Section 850 (the Zoning Ordinance) have been met; and WHEREAS, it has been determined that the Findings as required by Code Section No. 850.04 Subd. 4 have been satisfied: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council hereby grants a Conditional Use Permit to Fairview Health Services conditioned upon the following: 1. Design and materials detailed on ramp plan as presented May 2, 2000 to City Council. 2. Landscaping Plan dated, 4/20/00 and bond. 3. All lighting in parking structure and on the site containing the. structure shall be shaded so as to concentrate illumination on -site and within the structure. 4. No signage on the skyway. Passed and adopted this 2nd day of May, 2000. Member Hovland seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold Nay: Faust Motion carried. *PRELIMINARY REZONING AND OVERALL DEVELOPMENT PLAN - OPUS /CLARK, GRANDVIEW SQUARE CONTINUED TO MAY 16, 2000 Motion made by Member Johnson and seconded by Member Hovland continuing Preliminary Rezoning and Overall Development Plan for Grandview Square, Ron Clark/Opus Development until May 16, 2000. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. Mayor Maetzold excused himself from the remainder of the meeting at 8:05 P.M. ACTION TABLED UNTIL MAY 16 2000 ON ORDINANCE NO 2000 -05 - AMENDING SECTION 450 - SWIMMING POOLS Sanitarian Velde explained the reason for the proposed ordinance amendment was to bring Edina's code into compliance with state statute. The amendment would address three items in the Swimming Poll Code: spa pool deck elevations, access barriers, and chlorine concentration. Mr. Velde stated the first section would allow the required deck to be lower than the top rim of a spa pool. Spa pools are typical 30 to 34 inches in height and no larger than 100 square feet in area. Mr. Velde said staff believed this relation would not interfere with live saving efforts. The Page 6 Minutes/Edina City Council/May 2, 2000 second section would allow homeowners who have spa pools to use a rated safety cover instead of fencing to prevent toddlers from accessing the pool. Under the present Code, the homeowner would be required to fence the spa pool area. An ASTM rated safety cover is acceptable by the Uniform Building Code as barrier. The third section of the amendment increases maximum allowable chlorine residual from 3.0 ppm to 5.0 ppm. This is consistent with the state swimming pool code and the industry standard. Mayor Pro tem Kelly asked if ASTM standards require pool covers to lock. Mr. Velde answered he did not believe the standard required the covers lock. Mayor Pro tern Kelly expressed concern that a young child might be able to get under a spa or pool cover that was not locked, but not be able to get out. He requested further research into the possibility of requiring a lock on a spa cover if no fence were installed. Member Hovland made a motion, seconded by Member Johnson tabling action on the proposed ordinance amendment until May 16, 2000, allowing staff time to research lockable spa covers. Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly Motion carried. *AWARD OF BID FOR YEAR 2000 SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENT - CONTRACT 00- 1 CONTINUED TO MAY 18, 2000 Motion made by Member Johnson and seconded by Member Hovland to continue the award of bid for year 2000 sanitary sewer improvement, Contract No. 00 -1 to May 18, 2000. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR COUNTRY CLUB AREA STORM SEWER STS -253 CONTRACT 00 -6 Motion made by Member Johnson and seconded by Member Hovland for award of bid for Country Club Area Storm Sewer Improvement STS -253, Contract No. 00 -06 (Engineering) to recommended low bidder, Northdale Construction at $636,303.72. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR PUBLIC WORKS EMULSIFIED ASPHALT - CRS2 Motion made by Member Johnson and seconded by Member Hovland for award of 'bid for the annual purchase (April 1, 2000 to April 1, 2001) of emulsified asphalt - CRS2, to recommended low bidder, Marathon Ashland Petroleum at $.7600 per gallon delivered. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR AQUATIC VEGETATION CONTROL_ Motion made by Member Johnson and seconded by Member Hovland for award of bid for aquatic vegetation control on 38 ponds to recommended low bidder, Lake Management, Inc., at $17,535.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. LICENSEE WITHDREW APPEAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY CASE NO. 00-005031 - DANIEL'S ITALIAN RESTAURANT Manager Hughes informed the Council that Daniel's Italian Restaurant had withdrawn their previous appeal of their administrative penalty on Tuesday afternoon. No action taken. APPEALS OF ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY CASE NO. 00-005039 - EDEN AVENUE GRILL AND CASE NO. 00- 005040 - TWO GUYS FROM ITALY Mr. Hughes suggested that the Page 7 Minutes/Edina City Council/May 2, 2000 Council hear and discuss the two appeal cases concurrently. Chief Siitari briefly reviewed the City's administrative penalty matrix adopted last year, when the intoxicating liquor ordinance was enacted. He explained that the Council directed and staff has supported strict enforcement of the code. Mr. Siitari stated that approximately every three months the Police Department conducted undercover liquor investigations. He said that an under age person paired with one or two officers attempt to be served liquor in licensed establishments throughout the city. The undercover group enters an establishment and orders drinks. The decoy carries their actual identification and if asked shows the server. If the drinks are served the officers show their badges and inform the staff and manager that they have served a minor. If the minor. is served, the establishment receives an administrative penalty citation. Mr. Siitari reported that when the first under cover investigation was conducted only 41 % of the licensed establishments complied with the law. However, in the fall and during this last investigation compliance had increased to 76 %. Member Faust asked if the employees are charged criminally. Sgt. Larson replied that the employee actually serving the minor is charged with a gross misdemeanor. He reported that in his experience the employee is usually fined $200 -$300 and their charge is reduced to a misdemeanor if there are no same or similar charges within one year. Mr. Earl Cohen, Mansfield, Tanick & Cohen, representing Two Guys From Italy, and Daniel Sarno, Two Guys From Italy, 7495 France Avenue, appeared to appeal Administrative Citation Case No. 00- 005039. Mr. Cohen introduced Ms. Sandra Merrill, the server in the aforementioned case. Mr. Cohen said that the basis of the appeal was legal because in his opinion Ms. Merrill had not served a minor. Ms. Merrill stated that on a very busy evening, the undercover decoy and a female officer stood at the bar and ordered drinks. She filled their order and when she turned toward them, the officer told her she had served a minor. Ms. Merrill said she had intended to card the customers, but had not had a chance. Mr. Cohen added that his client did not believe service had taken place and this was the basis for their appeal. Mr. Siitari read from the officer's report stating that Ms. Merrill served the drinks without asking for ID before she was shown the officers badge and the citation issued. Mathew Maenkey, representing Eden Avenue Grill, stated that they did not have a legal argument. However, he noted the affidavits of Ken Johnson, proprietor of Eden Avenue Grill and Kevin Stotesberry, the server describing the night the citation was issued, and questioned the methodology of the undercover . investigation. In addition, Mr. Maenkey stated that Mr. Johnson had concern about the viability of his establishment in light of receiving a second citation, because of the severity of potential future citations. Mr. Maenkey asked the Council to grant Eden Avenue Grill relief from the citation. Kathy Iverson, Edina Chemical Health Advisor, 5410 York Avenue South, reminded the Council of the underage alcohol problem in Edina. She said the best deterrent to under age use of alcohol is swift and consistent penalties. The Council discussed the appeals, the performance of Edina restaurants overall, and the severity of the administrative penalty matrix. Staff pointed out that the penalty matrix drops the citations after 24 months. Mayor Pro tern Kelly said he felt this was a difficult task. He had Page 8 Minutes/Edina City Council/May 2, 2000 supported full liquor service in Edina, with the provision that underage service not happen. He said in his opinion it should not be too difficult to card every patron: Mayor Pro tem Kelly said he also wanted to support the fine restaurants such as the appellants. Member Hovland added that he believed the Council must do three things. First the two appeals must be decided, then he said at a later time the administrative penalty matrix should be reviewed, and finally, standards should be established for future undercover operations. He added that he would favor reducing the fines. Member Faust reminded the Council how far Edina had come in the last few years. She said the public had given their trust to the Council to protect the health and welfare of all citizens. In her opinion, the penalties are not too severe. Member Faust asked Mr. Cohen if Two Guys From Italy intends to pursue this issue in court. Mr. Cohen responded that Ms. Merrill was facing criminal, charges. The Council discussed a variety of methods of relief and came to consensus that the fine would remain, but the length of the suspension would be reduced. Motion of Member Hovland, seconded by Member Johnson to close the hearing. Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Motion carried. Member Hovland made a motion upholding the $1,000 fine, while reducing the three day suspension to a one day suspension to be served within the next thirty days, with the establishment choosing the day of the suspension for Administrative Penalty Case No. 00- 005040, Two Guys From Italy. Member Faust seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly Motion carried. Member Johnson made a motion upholding the $1,000 fine, while reducing the three day suspension to a one day suspension to be served within the next thirty days, with the establishment choosing the day of the suspension for Administrative Penalty Case No. 00- 005039, Eden Avenue Grill. Member Hovland seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly Motion carried. *RECYCLING REPORT REGARDING CONTRACT VS. SUBSCRIPTION SERVICES RECEIVED Motion made by Member Johnson and seconded by Member Hovland acknowledging receipt of the recycling report regarding contract vs. subscription services. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. HEARING DATE OF MAY 16, 2000, SET FOR REFERENDUM PROTECTS Following a brief discussion, Member Hovland made a motion setting a public hearing for the proposed referendum project for Tuesday, May 16, 2000, at 5:00 p.m., in the Edina City Council Chambers. Member Faust seconded the motion. Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly Motion carried. Page 9 Minutes/Edina City Council/May 2, 2000 CLAIMS PAID Motion made by Member Johnson approving payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated April 26, 2000, and consisting of 32 pages: General ' Fund $252,584.16; Communications $1,205.33; Working Capital $4,898.33; Art Center $21,681.23; Golf Dome Fund $2,025.88; Swimming Pool Fund $15,444.97, Golf Course Fund $128,684.43; Ice Arena Fund $1,217.72, Edinborough/Centennial Lakes $10,056.59, Utility Fund $263,403.12; Storm Sewer Utility Fund $125.53; Liquor Dispensary Fund $197,384.62, Construction Fund $11,128.63; TOTAL $909,840.54; and for confirmation of payment of claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated April 26, 2000, and consisting of 5 pages: General Fund $328,410.43; Working Capital $1,064.99; Art Center $180.00; Swimming Pool Fund $1,089.26; Golf Course Fund $294.33; Edinborough/ Centennial Lakes $545.30, Utility Fund $1,542.24; Storm Sewer Utility Fund $1,541.56; Liquor Dispensary Fund $61,652.90; Construction Fund $125,424.18; TOTAL $521,745.19. Member Hovland seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly Motion carried. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor pro tern Kelly adjourned the Council Meeting at 9:20 P.M. City Clerk Page 10 Y (-k���� REPORT /RECOMMENDATION TO: Mayor & City Council From: Craig Larsen City Planner Date: May 16, 2000 Subject: Final Plat Approval. Olinger Ridge. 5804 Olinger Rd. Recommendation: Agenda Item: II. B. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action: ❑ Motion ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Grant Final Plat approval for Olinger Ridge subject to Subdivision Dedication based on a raw land value of $92,000.00. Info /Background: The proponents have satisfied all conditions required for final approval, including the preparation of easement covering the shared driveway. Y v AU 101 v um PRESS— p n CM,e• /n — w r ntr,eml NPton a r—bp t swea 1• uum1...=er+v <. w ..m.m+ p.• w•.w aw rr. • a .eee.+ w tl. an. N w e.j.tr•.•/ 1NMe n w Iv .W Nrr•�rr [s.•.y. 14rwm.e 11.w e•uwi w •err .e w —.•r•/ w p..aa .• LLDmrA most, w 6 n•rr•y mr,r4 w m1e•b to w puY1c IP ptlk un iM r.swlwfr fP e w w v—Y pepo•n •r Enpn. w w plat a ebn•r e../.•r wN DrIP•r 6 CMno Mr Mr�nb v< F•r 1vlm QO w w •IYN•• rr 6nt•wrl Ns.p4r a r,.yq' •w a,eA tit•.• p•.••n•• b 41 •10Ai pr Ir Pcp•r wflu.: ui.� mr a . rom yp, —mr er sD0 o.1p,.. a.o.•c. srax v NnrKEDr. c01NTr 6 tti r...pe.0 wn.wn. w..e,mreep•e Nwe.. .1r_ ry er b bNr•• n Or••:•. Na. , �.pe re.ny.....•. h rolw•rtw •as+r .— smoMn Nmra a 3 rrmoo M .. M w STATE 6 Ww Scrr COwrr w N PIN TAN f•r.pl41YN1ws r •mpeeyi rM• w. M_ .r q R w — w w Dr w M•bry Il�er (ants. MI•wwr h CdN•een ••pr•r 1 Mr•ey brtYy wt t Mw rnvrlN w p•!be w Pw•ry m•eww a erm p.t s• aom maw w< uw d•t w o rny.et nP4rnt•twn a w rurwrl wt on stwen w rsnetly rro•n en w qre r Int w ..nr•itl,• a • /wt1 N•. W wne• Mw ••.n eerY•etl p•ni M w Pans u ww . Al Y p•c•i n npYM sy w rul pevrrw•nw vn1 wt W oultlm porWry IMr •rI cp.vctry e.ep.tw o• 1M p.! wei G 400N. Lw arr•YP IiwM• ll[.ra• NI!•r RtN STATE v Nw6svrA EMS" v1 w IM IP•p.•O 3Vtnn•1r1 ••r aS .ft. bIP• p• my a1 . two , ww t brel !w 4eveyP. . h cwt •m", EDM NM6SUTA — p•. At D.Q@N ME _..pp.we w I!, .y tM cXy c—S IT te.n, N. 4. At • .....r tl .l Mi pb by er two. It .. It— M titVn ta•Nn.4 w •revw•,Imtbo a w tavrmrlr pr rr.vpp SW w w c-1 "..—Y tno— bw e••n rrcNwi 4 w oq r w P•rvMe IS my write Irr .• p.np•t nowt s/ net rawNnn w r.ov.N.10..br •. pwWi b NMwb L.eNe•r s.crN• 52M sv,aem, n CITT CMXMM v COY• NM®IA M N.rP M tw tl lAlpArtR SERVICES lD.2T10R. N[14pw CDwri•, NDM930n 11w�py artly wt t•wr Pr•r• o w r.Nr y.w Mw b•w nr Is — r•Prr en tli p1.! wtre twr _ my a OLINGER RIDGE M IR 0 8 E R T I - R.LS. ,.,, 8:. o YIDDICYIST i I •S I C3 x 4!9n.37 tl K m I A001t loll I A.3S � 0 '- i •ti VEST ni r- ------- ------ --- -- -- -- —3 ---- ---- ------- g w OI I r------ - - - - -- — ------------------------ FI I I I a I t9 I I I 1 N y I O I I I 1 � 1 III 1 1 11 1 W ■� 1 A I I I ___ Y Y I 1 1 1 n 1 1 1 •[ n 1 1 1 I z 1 11 2 • I 1 I. 4 I - 1 1 I T I I I 1 I I I I I 1 I 50 0 so IM tl I I I 1 rc m i i i I Scole V= 50 Ft ' Lp? - - - -J L ------ .lmi____J _ < 242.00 •I I 8L A K E RICO: I R. L. S. N0. D:. A. ID I I I I • .dm ton a.•4 M. suevn vmsMl. Inow tDw1Y..Qrasv. n.•,at m NNr snr. s.� m4••• n94n, .N. p.........• .ppa.w t1m _ rr a .m _ . ae.y r. ta...o, Nn•4p. cr,nb SPn.rP M . e•p11tr r6alSI4i4 v nrt6f. ND4e7w rarrrr, Ntrsmra 1 1•m•W c•.wy -9. w wtrw p•• a NOUN :X016 ESrnxe .•. n•• IP .rcw n ayr •rrr:I tlm my •I . M_, _ .•e.a _ NICrN k Miff, Q•pbtrP pI rWn M AIp11.r DIYARS -aA=AL LND BURiBYORB, INC. 1 I 1 1 1 4.•o a h•. w eM MI•.o w Q•t •iw. Subdivision No. 'S OO r SUBDIVISION DEDICATION REPORT TO: City Council FROM: Planning Department Subdivision Name: Land Size: �'�' Land Value: iC12-, aDD (By. '4 E Date: �- S - ) The developer of this subdivision has been required to A. Grant an easement over part of the land B. Dedicate % of the land XC. Donate $ as a fee in lieu of land As a result of applying the following policy: A. Land required (no density or intensity may be used for the first 5% of land dedicated) 1. If property is adjacent to an existing park or playground and the addition beneficially expands the park or playground. 2. If property is six acres or will be combined with future dedications so that the end result will be a minimum of a six acre park. 3. If property abuts a natural lake, pond, or stream or wetland then protected by state or federal law. 4. If property is necessary for storm water holding or will be dredged or otherwise improved for storm water holding areas or ponds. 5. If the property is a place of significant natural, scenic or historic value. B. Cash Required 1. In all other instances than above. Minutes/Edina City Council/April 18, 2000 PLANNED OFFICE DISTRICT -2 (POD -2) FROM PLANNED OFFICE DISTRICT -1 (POD -1) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: 1 Section 1. Subsection 850.06 of Section 850 of the Edina City Code is amended by adding the following thereto: "The extent of the Planned Office District -2 (POD -2) is enlarged by the addition of the following property: LOT ONE, BLOCK ONE, BRAEWOOD PARK SECOND ADDMON The extent of the Planned Office District -1 (POD -1) is reduced by removing the property described above from the Planned Office District -1." Section 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. Passed and adopted this 18th day of April, 2000. Attest City Clerk Member Johns_ on seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes :; Faust, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold; n carried. Mayor V *PRELIMINARY REZONING AND OVERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN GRANDVIEW SQUARE CONTINUED TO MAY 2, 2000 Motion made by Member Kelly and seconded by tp Member Johnson continuing Preliminary Rezoning and Overall Development Plan for Grandview Square, Ron Clark/Opus Development until May 2, 2000. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. OLINGER RIDGE PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Presentation by Planner Mr. Larsen stated the subject property is a developed single dwelling lot measuring 105,066 square feet in area. The property is neck shaped with the bulk of the land located approximately 200 feet west of Olinger Road. The property has 75 feet of frontage on Olinger Road with a considerable slope from north to south. The proposed subdivision would remove the existing home and plat two new lots. Mr. Larsen explained that when subdividing property the Edina code measures lot width at a point 50 feet back from the street. Therefore, each of the new lots would require a lot width variance because at the point of measurement they are respectively 38 feet and 37 feet. However, he pointed out both lots measure 121 feet in width, further back at the building pad. Lot 1 would be 375 feet deep and Lot 2 would be 337 feet deep. Mr. Larsen added this situation results from the proponent's desire to serve the two new lots with a shared driveway instead of a new public street. He noted there would be the ability to Page 3 Minutes/Edina City CounciVApril 18, 2000 O provide the necessary right -of -way to construct a normal 30 -foot street and cul de sac. However, such a street would be very close to the back of the houses on Grove Circle and would require removal of some of the large pine trees on the northerly portion of the subject property. The shared driveway concept appears to be a better option in this case. Mr. Larsen reported that the Planning Commission recommends approval of the preliminary plat for Olinger Ridge with four conditions: Final plat approval; Subdivision dedication; Watershed district permit; and Increasing driveway width to 18 feet. Member Faust asked about drainage from the new lots and why one driveway was proposed, instead of two? Mr. Larsen stated that the watershed district will review the drainage, but drainage may not increase or change direction after platting. He explained that one driveway was proposed to keep the hard surface to a minimum, however, cross easements would be provided and adequate land existed to allow individual driveways be built if necessary. Carla Young, 5210 Malibu Drive, explained she is the proponent, and a new resident to Edina Ms. Young said she plans to move the existing home. After moving the home, Ms. Young plans to build a new home on one lot and sell the other. No public comment was heard. Motion of Member Johnson, seconded by Member Faust closing the public hearing. Ayes: Faust, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold Motion carried. Member Johnson made a motion introducing the following resolution and moving its adoption with four conditions: Final plat approval; Subdivision dedication; Watershed district permit; and Increasing driveway width to 18 feet: RESOLUTON NO. 200048 APPROVING PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR OLINGER RIDGE ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled, "OLINGER RIDGE ADDITION ", platted by Carla Young, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council on April 18, 2000, be and is hereby granted preliminary plat approval. Passed and adopted by the Edina City Council this 18th day of April 2000. Member Faust seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold Resolution adopted. FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVED, K E PETERS BILLIARD SUPPLY - 665 PARKLAWN AVENUE Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and-ordered placed on file. Page 4 DECLARATION OF DRIVEWAY EASEMENT & MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT THIS DECLARATION OF EASEMENT is made this day of , 2000, by the following: Carla'E. and Rodney A. Young, (hereinafter referred to as "Owner"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Owner is the fee owner of the following described real property located in Hennepin County, Minnesota: Lots, 1 and 2, Block 1, Olinger Ridge, according to the recorded plat thereof on file in the office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota (collectively hereinafter referred to as the "Benefitted Properties "); and WHEREAS, the Owner desires to declare and establish a certain driveway easement over and across certain portions of the Benefitted which are legally described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference (the "Easement Area "). NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, the Owner hereby declares the following easements, and maintenance agreement for the purposes and upon the terms hereinafter described: 1. Declaration of Easement. The Owners hereby declare that the Benefitted Properties are and shall be owned, transferred, sold, conveyed and occupied subject to a nonexclusive easement over and across the Easement Area for the purposes described below. Said easement shall burden the Easement Area and shall benefit the Benefitted_ Properties. Said easement shall be appurtenant to and run with the title to the Benefitted Properties, and shall be perpetual. 2. Ingress and Egress and Placement of Utilities. The easement created herein is or ingress and egress to and across the Easement Area, to and from adjacent roadways, and to and from the Benefitted Properties. Further, the easement created shall be for the placement of and occupation by underground utilities. Said utilities shall include, but not be limited to, sanitary sewer, water, electric, gas, telephone, cable television or other electronic wiring. 3. Driveway Location. The location of the common driveway is hereby agreed to be located as shown on the attached exhibit "A ". 4. Maintenance of Easement. The owners of the Benefitting Properties shall be responsible for, and shall equally pay for, the ongoing and general maintenance, repair and replacement of, the portion of the Easement Area situated over all Benefitted Properties. However, in the event of any damage to the common driveway that occurs as a direct result of construction activity by any of the owners, such damage shall be repaired at the cost of the owner who contracted such construction. 5. Interference with Easement. No obstructions which would prevent, restrict or otherwise inhibit the passage of pedestrians or vehicles, or the maneuvering of vehicles on the Easement Area, shall be erected, condoned, or permitted to endure by the owner(s) of the Easement Area or any part thereof. 6. Enforcement of Easement: Remedies for Violation. The restrictions set forth herein shall be enforceable by the owner of each lot, and by each owner's respective successors in title, by restraining order or injunction, temporary or permanent, prohibiting such violation or interference and demanding compliance with the provisions hereof, which restraining order and injunction shall be obtainable upon proof of the existence of such violation or attempted or threatened violation or interference and without the necessity of proof of the inadequacy of legal remedies or irreparable harm. In the event of any litigation, arbitration or other proceeding for the interpretation or enforcement of this Agreement, the prevailing party will be entitled to receive an award of its costs, including reasonable attorney's fees. 7. No Dedication to Public. Nothing herein contained shall constitute a dedication of any interest in any of the Benefitted Properties to the public or to public use or to give the members of the public any rights hereunder, Including, without limitation, any rights in the Easement Area. 8. Amendment. This Declaration of Easement may be amended by an instrument executed by all of the owners of the Lots comprising the Benefitted Properties, provided, however, that each Lot shall, at all times, have pedestrian and vehicular ingress and egress. Any such amendment must be filed In the office of the County Recorder of Hennepin County in order to be effective. 9. Successors and Assigns. The terms and condition of this Declaration of Easement shall bind and inure to the benefit of the Declarant and all successors in tide to all or part of the Benefitted Properties affected hereby. IN WITNESS WHEREOF. the Declarants have caused this Instrument to be executed as of the day and year first above written. By: - STATE OF MINNESOTA) SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) +t. The foregoing was acknowledged before me this (� day of MOL , 2000, by . Carla E. and Rodney A. Youn . This instrument was drafted by: ■ AQ TARI K HAUNTY .rao �aor� =1ara= 2 I Exhibit A 2 of 2 SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION A perpetual easement for driveway and utility purposes over, under and across those parts of Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, OLINGER RIDGE, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: A 20.00 foot easement for driveway and utility purposes over, under and across lot 1 and Lot 2, Block 1 OLINGER RIDGE, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the east line (said east line having an assumed bearing of South 00 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds East) of Lot 1, Block 1, distant 16.47 feet southerly of the northeast corner thereof; thence South 87 degrees 54 minutes 50 seconds West, distant 11.20 feet; thence 86.12 feet southwesterly along a tangential curve concave to the southeast having a radius of 417.00 feet and a central angle of 11 degrees 50 minutes 00 seconds; thence South 76 degrees 04 minutes 50 seconds West tangent to the last described curve, distant 164.00 feet; thence North 89 degrees 41 minutes 32 seconds West, distant 70.65 feet to a point on the west line of said Lot 2, distant 29.92 feet southerly of the northeast corner thereof and said line there terminating. "THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY" ORIENTATION OF THIS BEARING SYSTEM IS BASED ON THE RECORD PLAT OF ADDITION. AS OF THE DATE OF THIS SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION, HAS NOT BEEN RECORDED, THEREFORE THE PROPOSED ACCESS EASEMENT DESCRIBED AND SHOWN HEREON CANNOT BE FILED FOR RECORD UNTIL SAID IS RECORDED. I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Signed this 3rd day of May, 2000. For: Carla E. and Rodney A. Young. By: David E. Cook MN Reg. No. 22414 3 S� c; 'w91N�1j o e ' v � ! REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: David Velde City Sanitarian Date: May 16, 2000 U Subject: Ordinance Amending Section 450 /Swimming Pools Recommendation: Agenda Item: Ill. A. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action: ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ® Ordinance ❑ Discussion Grant first reading to Ordinance No. 2000 - 5 and waive second reading. Info /Background: This proposed amendment does include a requirement that the spa pool cover be secured and locked when not in use. This amendment addresses three items in the Swimming Pool Code: spa pool deck elevations; access barriers; and chlorine concentration. Section 1 of the amendment will allow the required deck to be lower than the top rim of a spa pool. The spa pools are typically 30 to 34 inches in height and no larger than 100 square feet in area. It is believed by staff that this relaxation of the Code will not interfere with life saving efforts. Section 2 of the amendment will allow homeowners who have spa pools to use a rated safety cover instead of fencing to prevent toddlers from accessing the pool. Under the present Code, the homeowner would be required to fence the spa pool area. A rated safety cover is accepted by the Uniform Building Code as a barrier. The safety cover must be secured and locked at all times the spa pool is not in use. Edina Ordinance No. 2000 - 5 An Ordinance Amending Section 450 of the City Code Changing Deck Requirement, Fencing Requirements and Updating Water Chemistry Requirements The City Council of the City of Edina Ordains: Section 1. The second paragraph of Subd. 7 of Subsection 450.06 is hereby replaced with the following: "Except, a deck is not needed around the perimeter of a special purpose pool providing the following conditions are met: A. The pool is accessible from at least one side by a deck. B. The deck is no less than four feet wide as measured perpendicular to the pool side and no less than eight feet long as measured parallel with the pool side. C. The special purpose pool is not located within four feet of a residential swimming pool. D. The deck elevation is no lower than the elevation at the base of the special purpose pool or no more than 9 inches above the normal water line of the special purpose pool." Section 2. Subd. 1 of Subsection 450.16 is amended to read as follows: "Subd. 1. Free Chlorine. The free chlorine content shall be maintained between five - tenths (0.5) and five (5.0) parts per million." Section 3. Subsection 450.24 of the City Code is amended by adding a new last sentence as follows: "Except a special purpose pool need not meet the fence requirement provided: A. The special purpose pool is equipped with a safety cover listed in accordance with American Society for Testing ' and Materials (ASTM) Standard F 1346, "Standard Performance Specification for Safety Covers and Labeling Requirements for All Covers for Swimming Pools, Spas and Hot Tubs." B. The safety cover is secured and locked in place at all times the special purpose pool is not occupied." Section 4. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon adoption. 41 o e t4 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: David Velde City Sanitarian Date: May 16, 2000 Subject: Ordinance Amending Section 740 Parking Garages Recommendation: Agenda Item: Ill. B. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action: ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ® Ordinance ❑ Discussion Grant first reading to Ordinance No. 2000 - 6 and waive second reading. Info /Background: This amendment would extend the license year for underground parking garages from July 1 of each year to January 31 of each year. This would spread our license renewals out during the year and would also move the inspections of the garages into the colder months of the year. A ■ Edina Ordinance No. 2000 - 6 An Ordinance Amending Section 740 By Changing License Term THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 740.04 Subd. 3 shall be amended to read as follows: "Subd. 3. Term. Licenses issued pursuant to this Section shall expire on January 31s' of each calendar year." Section 2. The term of current licensees shall be extended until January 31, 2001. Section 3. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon adoption. First Reading: Second Reading: Published in Edina Sun Current: Attest City Clerk Mayor ,5 t TO: FROM: VIA: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Mayor & City Council Marty Scheerer, Fire Chief Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: May 16, 2000 AGENDA ITEM IV.A. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Type III Ambulance on a Ford E -350 Super Duty Chassis Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. North Central Ambulance Sales 1. $98,507.00 2. Wheeled Coach 2. $100,281.00 3. Road Rescue. Emergency Vehicles 3. $101,460.00 4. Wheeled Coach *Alternate Offer (does not meet specifications) 4. $82,490.00 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: North Central Ambulance Sales $98,507.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This vehicle would be purchased with Fire Department equipment replacement funds. The vehicle would be on a six -year rep laceme nt/rech assis schedule. The vehicle would replace a 1991 International Ambulance. The bid by North Central Ambulance is for a Braun Raider Type III on a Ford E -350 Chassis. The Fire Department currently has two of this type of ambulances in service and they have proved to be very reliable and well engineered. The lowest bidder, North Central Ambulance Sales have been a very good company to work with. The alternate offer by Wheeled Coach does not meet Fire Dept. bid specifications. I recommend that we award the bid to the lowest bidder that meets Fire Department specifications, North Central Ambulance Sales. Signature The Recommended Bid is within budget Fire Department not within budget J n Wallin, Finance Director G don Hughes, Cit anager A. o e , o eBe REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: 'May 16, 2000 ITEM DESCRIPTION: Sanitary Sewer Improvements, W Pipe, Contract No. 00 -1 (ENG) Company 1. Northdale Construction Company 2. S.R. Weidma 3. Barbarossa and Sons 4. G.L. Contracting 5. Lametti & Sons, Inc. 6. Richard Knutson, Inc. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Northdale Construction Company GENERAL INFORMATION: AGENDA ITEM W.B. Lift Station, Forcemain and Diversion Amount of Quote or Bid 1. $ 898,351.31 2. $1,036,866.90 3. $1,054,447.70 4. $1,102,684.84 5. $1,138,463.40 6. $1,208,260.60 $ 898,351.31 This purchase is for the sanitary sewer improvements developed by TKDA from our sanitary sewer report in 1997. This project provides for a new lift station at W. 62nd Street and forcemain system to our Richfield interceptor at 65th & Xerxes. This project also provides for a sanitary sewer diversion through the new system if repairs are necessary on our existing 54th & Xerxes interceptor into Minneapolis. This project is funded from bond sale proceeds. The bid also included a new lift station at Garrison Lane which is rejected because insufficient bond proceeds exist for this station. This station will be added to our normal capital improvement plan. The Engineer's Estimate for this project was $855,854.70. WNAVW� 33 Sign The Recommended Bid is within budget Public Works - Engineering Department not within budget nlin, Fi Gor on Hughes, City Manager 'rlr o e .�0 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works VIA: . Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: 16 May, 2000 ITEM DESCRIPTION: One Cargo Van Company 1. Superior Ford (State of Minnesota Contract No. 424727) 2. 3. 4. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Superior Ford GENERAL INFORMATION: AGENDA ITEM iv. c. Amount of Quote or Bid 1. $ 18;066.00 2. 3. 4. 5. $ 18,066.00 This purchase is from the State of Minnesota Cooperative Purchasing Program. This cargo van is a replacement for a 1992 Ford van. This purchase is funded through the Public Works Equipment Replacement budget. Signat e The Recommended Bid is within budget I ,1 IL, not within budget Jon VV4-llin, Finance Director ordon HugliesQgity Manager �91N��1 o e o 'VC,Aroaw'�6 lase REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15.000 DATE: 16 May, 2000 AGENDA ITEM IV. D. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Two Dump Truck Boxes - One Tandem and One Single Axle Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. J. Craft, Inc. (State of Minnesota Contract #425123) 1. $ 96,344.00 2. 2. 3. 3. 4. 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: J. Craft, Inc. GENERAL INFORMATION: $ 96,344.00 This is for the purchase of two dump truck boxes. One box is for a new tandem axle dump truck and one box is for a single axle dump truck. These boxes will be installed on new unit #'s 25 -346 and 25 -347. This purchase is funded through the Public Works Equipment Replacement budget. This purchase is through the State of Minnesota Cooperative Purchasing Program. Public Works - Streets Signatu Department The Recommended Bid is k �--! within budget not within )budget Jokli allin, inance Director Go on Hughes, City n ger REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: VINCE BONGAARTS TRAFFIC SAFETY COORDINATOR Date: MAY 169 2000 Subject: TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW - MAY 19 2000 Agenda Item V.A. Consent Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To BRA ® To Council ❑ Motion 1:1 Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion RECOMMENDATION: Approve Traffic Safety Staff Review of May 1, 2000. TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW MONDAY, MAY 1, 2000 The staff review of traffic safety matters occurred on May 1, 2000. Staff present included the Police Chief, the City Engineer, the City Planner, the Assistant City Engineer, the Public Works Traffic Control Specialist and the Traffic Safety Coordinator. From that review, the below recommendations are provided. On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and the staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They have also been informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, they can be included on the May 16, 2,000, Council Agenda. SECTION A: Requests on which the staff recommends approval. 1. Request for the removal of two parking spaces on the east side of Drew Avenue between W: 66th Street and the driveway at 6533 Drew Avenue. This is also the location of an MTC bus stop. The bus stop is located south of the parking spaces and north of W. 66th Street. The requestor (the eye clinic at 6533 Drew) feels that because of the lack of sidewalks at this location the parking spots should be removed to provide a safer access to the bus stop. The problem is especially evident in the winter and when it is raining when persons going to the bus stop have to walk out into the street around the parked cars to get to the bus stop. The staff recommends "No Parking Anytime" restrictions on Drew Avenue south of the drivewav at 6533 Drew to W. 66 2. Request to extend the no parking zone on the west side of Barrie Road from the east driveway at 6400 Barrie where it presently starts, further north on Barrie Road. Requestors feel that vehicles are presently parking too close to the curve in the road and driveway entrance creating a problem for vehicles southbound on Barrie Road approaching the curve at this location. TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW May 1, 2000 Page 2 The staff recommends moving the "No Parking Begins Here" sign from its present location on the north side of the east driveway entrance to 6400 Barrie Road to a point 21 feet north of that location. 3. A request to improve the pedestrian awareness signs on Ayrshire Boulevard in the area between Lochloy Drive and Duncraig Road where the children cross to access Highland Elementary School. A traffic survey showed the Monday through Friday Average Daily Traffic (ADT) to be 625 vehicles. The 85 percentile speed -was 32 mph. A further breakdown of traffic flow during school start times showed an average of 28 vehicles between 8:00 and 9:00 AM. School start time is 8:25 AM to 8:35 AM. Afternoon traffic flow when school gets out shows an average of 27 vehicles between 3:00 PM and 4:00 PM. School out time is 3:05 PM to 3:15 PM. The above indicated very light traffic for Ayrshire Boulevard during school start and school out times. Observations of the area did not find any apparent problems that the children were having with the traffic, however, there are no sidewalks in this area requiring all pedestrians to use the street. The staff recommends the addition of "25 mph" advisory plaques to the present pedestrian awareness signs already in place on Ayrshire Boulevard at Lochloy Drive for eastbound traffic and on Ayrshire Boulevard at Duncraig for westbound traffic. 4. Request to remove the "No Parking School Days 7 AM - 9 AM" signs on Concord Terrace. These signs were installed when the Community Center was the High School to prevent the students from parking in the neighborhood. There is no other reason for the signs and the requestor feels the signs are not only an inconvenience, but are deteriorating and becoming eyesores. The staff recommends the removal of all the "No Parking School Days 7 AM 9 AM" signs on Concord Terrace. /i. TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW May 1, 2000 Page 3 SECTION B: Requests on which the staff recommends denial of request. 1. Request for a marked pedestrian crosswalk on Valley View Road at Chapel Lane. Requestor feels that a crosswalk is needed at this location to provide safe access across Valley View Road to the Chapel Lane area. This location is between the entrance /exits of the west parking lot of the Edina High School. There are sidewalks on the north side of Valley View Road and also a marked pedestrian crosswalk at the intersection of Valley View Road and Antrim Road. There are no sidewalks on the south side of Valley View Road and none on Chapel Lane. Observations of the area during afternoons when school gets out showed very few, if any, pedestrian traffic to Chapel Lane at this location. The staff recommends denial of this request for lack of any warrants. SECTION C: Requests which are deferred to a later date or referred to others. 1. The staff received a request to look at traffic on Bush Lake Road, especially the intersection at Bush Lake Road and Dewey Hill Road. The staff has decided to continue this item for further study. . f� s REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: Craig Larsen City Planner Date: May 16, 2000 Subject: 1 -494 Corridor Commission Funding for 494/35W Inter- change Recommendation: Adopt attached Resolution. Information /Background: Agenda Item: V. B. Consent ❑ Information Only - ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action: ❑ Motion ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion The 1-494 Corridor Commission is asking its seven member cities to adopt the attached Resolution supporting funding to reconstruct the 494 -35W interchange. The Commission intends to use the resolution in their attempt to gain additional funding and to move forward the timing of the reconstruction. DATE RESOLUTION NO. MOTION BY SECONDED BY RESOLUTION SUPPORTING I -494 CORRIDOR COMMISSION EFFORTS TO SECURE FEDERAL FUNDS FOR THE REBUILDING OF THE I- 494/35W INTERCHANGE WHEREAS, the I -494 Corridor Commission is a Joint Powers Organization (JPO) representing the transportation system concerns of the seven cities of Bloomington, Eden Prairie, Edina, Maple Grove, Minnetonka, Plymouth and Richfield; and, WHEREAS, the I -494 Corridor Commission represents the transportation interests of 21 percent of the region's employers and 19 percent of the region's residents; and, WHEREAS, the mission of the I -494 Corridor Commission is to promote the improvement of I -494 infrastructure from the Minnesota River to I -94 in order to increase its people- moving capacity and to improve mobility for businesses and residents throughout the region; and, WHEREAS, the I -494 Corridor Commission consistently supports a multi -modal transportation system approach to exploring initiatives that might benefit the region as a whole, and continues to actively participate as a member of multiple jurisdiction transportation planning groups, such as the Minnesota Transportation Alliance, that seek long -term funding solutions for Minnesota's transportation system; and, WHEREAS, the I -494 Corridor Commission is actively involved in planning for the needs of its member communities and the region as a whole by proactively developing Travel Demand Management (TDM) plans and programs that increase 494 vehicle capacity; by providing employers and developers with incentives that promote alternatives to driving alone; by planning competitive transit services to employment centers around the corridor; by adding bus shoulder lanes and high occupancy vehicle (HOV) ramp meter bypasses at strategic corridor locations; by promoting transit- oriented site planning at new development and redeveloped areas; by advocating for local land use changes supporting TDM; and by overseeing 494 road reconstruction project staging to facilitate and coordinate future planned road projects; and, WHEREAS, the I -494 Corridor Commission is assisting MnDOT and the Metropolitan Council in identifying a number of high - priority multimodal projects along the 494 corridor and how best to stage these projects to mitigate traffic congestion and delay during 494 reconstruction periods; and, 1 WHEREAS, the I -494 Corridor Commission provides an ongoing stakeholder forum for the planning of I -494 reconstruction through regular meetings of the 494 Chamber of Commerce Subcommittee, the 494 Engineers' Subcommittee and the 494 Transit Providers' Subcommittee; and, WHEREAS, the I -494 Corridor Commission, through the work of its member cities of Bloomington and Richfield, has identified the interchange of I -494 and I -35W as a critical infrastructure improvement that needs immediate attention; and, WHEREAS, the approximate cost of the improvements is estimated at $125 million or more and the State of Minnesota has approximately $66 million committed for the project in the years 2011 and beyond; and, WHEREAS, the I -494 Corridor Commission is continuing its search for innovative funding partnerships that will increase or "speed up" funding for critical 494 roadway and transit improvements; and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of hereby declares its support of I -494 Corridor Commission activities relating to the procurement of federal funding to improve I -494 infrastructure and services; and, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that a copy of this resolution be forwarded to the Honorable Congressman James Ramstad, Minnesota Third District; the Honorable Congressman Martin Sabo, Minnesota Fifth District; the Honorable Congressman James Oberstar, Minnesota Eighth District; the Honorable Congressman David Minge, Minnesota Second District; the Honorable Senator Paul Wellstone; the Honorable Senator Rod Grams; Governor Jesse Ventura; State Senator District , State Senator District State Representative District State Representative District , the Chair of the Metropolitan Council Transportation Advisory Board (TAB); the Chair of the Metropolitan Council Technical Advisory Committee (TAC); the Chair of the Metropolitan Council; the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Transportation; the Board of the Minnesota Transportation Alliance; the Chair of the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners. Passed and duly adopted by the City Council of the City of this _ day of 12000. 2 COUNCIL CHECK ASTER 10 -MAY -2000 (1- ,1) page 1 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 210239 05/16/00 $1,145.05 3M CO HGF0878 STATE CONTRACT NUMBER TP22095 STREET NAME SI SIGNS & POSTS 5788 < *> $1,145.05* 210240 05/16/00 $1,231.18 AAA TAX, TITLE, PLATES FO 042500 EQUIPMENT OPER LIC & PERMITS < *> $1,231.18* 210241 05/16/00 $28.50 AAA T.E. PLATES FOR 47.24 050400 EQUIPMENT OPER LIC & PERMITS < *> $28.50* 210242 05/16/00 $252.04 ACTION MAILING SERVICES MAIL SERVICE 84808 GENERAL(BILLIN PROF SERVICES 05/16/00 $545.51 ACTION MAILING SERVICES MAIL AQUATIC FLYERS 84892 POOL OPERATION PROF SERVICES < *> $797.55* 210243 05/16/00 $55.00 AFFILIATED EMERGENCY VET KENNEL SERVICES 0011238 ANIMAL CONTROL LEASE LINES < *> $55.00* 210244 05/16/00 $31.26 AGGARWAL, SUCHIT DOME BUCKET CARD REFU 042600 GOLF DOME GOLF DOME RECP < *> $31.26* . 210245 05/16/00 $11,836.25 ALBINSON REPROGRAPHICS PLOTTER & COLOR PRO C36231 ENGINEERING GE EQUIP REPLACEM 4640 < *> $11,836.25* 210246 05/16/00 $234.00 ALEXANDER, PETE SOFTBALL UMPIRE 050200 EDINA ATHLETIC PROF SERVICES < *> $234.00* 210247 05/16/00 $284.55 ALL SAINTS BRANDS COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 00020392 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 05/16/00 $296.84 ALL SAINTS BRANDS COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 00020397 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 05/16/00 $1,345.00 ALL SAINTS BRANDS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 00020552 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 $497.00 ALL SAINTS BRANDS COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 00020561 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE < *> $2,423.39* 210248 05/16/00 $77.95 ALL -SAFE DIV. OF ALL FIR MAINTENANCE 032160 CITY HALL GENE CONTR REPAIRS 4751 < *> $77.95* 210249 05/16/00 $126.20 ALPHAGRAPHICS PRINTING 49991 ED ADMINISTRAT PRINTING 2080 < *> $126.20* 210250 05/16/00 $38.50 AMELL, TOM REFUND PARKING PERMIT 050200 STREET REVOLVI OTHER PERM & L < *> $38.50* 210251 05/16/00 $3,250.00 AMERICAN SANDBLASTING IN PAINTING 050400 POOL OPERATION PAINT 7086 < *> $3,250.00* 210252 05/16/00 $193.75 AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAR MATS & RAGS 04.30 CITY HALL GENE LAUNDRY 05/16/00 $16.80 AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAR LAB TOWELS 04.30.00 LABORATORY LAUNDRY 05/16/00 $58.49 AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAR LINEN 04/30 GOLF DOME CLEANING SUPPL 6323 05/16/00 $94.26 AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAR LAUNDRY 04/30/00 YORK OCCUPANCY LAUNDRY 05/16/00 $64.41 AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAR LINEN 043000 GRILL LAUNDRY 6323 < *> $427.71* 210253 05/16/00 $372.75 ANCHOR PRINTING CO. SUMMER.2000 BROCHURES 200594 -0 ADAPTIVE RECRE PRINTING < *> $372.75* 210254 05/16/00 $262.80 ANNE BROWNFIELD BROWN AQUATIC PARK BROCHURE 042400 POOL OPERATION PROF SERVICES < *> $262.80* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 10 -MAY -2000 (13:31) page 2 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 210255 05/16/00 $954.19 ARMSTRONG TRUCK ACCESSOR TRUCK TOPPER 99007930 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 3802 < *> $954.19* 210256 05/16/00 $37.00 ARTEEL, PATTI TENNIS LESSON REFUND 050300 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F < *> $37.00* 210257 05/16/00 $560.00 ASCAP DUES - LICENSE 042000 ARENA ADMINIST DUES & SUBSCRI 8002• < *> $560.00* 210258 05/16/00 $48.48 ASHWORTH INC. APPAREL 659242 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6212 05/16/00 $195.89 ASHWORTH INC. HATS 664848 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6211 05/16/00 $684.33 ASHWORTH INC. CLOTHING 667153 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6212 05/16/00 $811.80 ASHWORTH INC. CLOTHING 672336 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6212 05/16/00 $176.52 ASHWORTH INC. MERCHANDISE 676430 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6212 05/16/00 $28.50 ASHWORTH INC. HATS 677076 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6212 < *> $1,945.52* 210260 05/16/00 $141.27 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS RUBBISH REMOVAL 050100 CITY HALL GENE RUBBISH REMOVA 05/16/00 $332.02 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS RUBBISH REMOVAL 050100 GENERAL MAINT RUBBISH REMOVA 05/16/00 $332.01 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS RUBBISH REMOVAL 050100 PW BUILDING RUBBISH REMOVA 05/16/0.0 $95.61 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS RUBBISH REMOVAL 050100 FIRE DEPT. GEN RUBBISH REMOVA 05/16/00 $21.70 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS RUBBISH REMOVAL 050100 FIRE SUPPLIES RUBBISH REMOVA 05/16/00 $411.09 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS RUBBISH REMOVAL 050100 ARENA BLDG /GRO RUBBISH REMOVA 05/16/00 $269.58 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS RUBBISH REMOVAL 050100 MAINT OF COURS RUBBISH REMOVA 05/16/00 $486.40 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS RUBBISH REMOVAL 050100 CLUB HOUSE RUBBISH REMOVA 05/16/00 $43.40 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS RUBBISH REMOVAL 050100 ART CENTER BID RUBBISH REMOVA 05/16/00 $69.70 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS RUBBISH REMOVAL 050100 LITTER REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVA 05/16/00 $352.82 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS RUBBISH REMOVAL 050100 POOL OPERATION RUBBISH REMOVA 05/16/00 $677.75 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS RUBBISH REMOVAL 050100 ED BUILDING & RUBBISH REMOVA 05/16/00 $76.40 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS RUBBISH REMOVAL 050100 VERNON OCCUPAN RUBBISH REMOVA 05/16/00 $67.39 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS RUBBISH REMOVAL 050100 YORK OCCUPANCY RUBBISH REMOVA 05/16/00 $23.99 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS RUBBISH REMOVAL 050100 50TH ST OCCUPA RUBBISH REMOVA 05/16/00 $199.23. ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS RUBBISH REMOVAL 050100 LITTER REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVA 05/16/00 $91.60 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS RUBBISH REMOVAL 050100 FRED RICHARDS RUBBISH REMOVA < *> $3,691.96* 210261 05/16/00 $100.00 AUDUBON INTERNATIONAL MEMBER ID: GC1689 050300 GOLF ADMINISTR DUES & SUBSCRI 6025 < *> $100.00* 210262 05/16/00 $85.14 AUGIE'S INC. SANDWICHES 30608 FRED RICHARDS COST OF GD SOL 6324 05/16/00 $45.24 AUGIE'S INC. SANDWICHES 30793 FRED RICHARDS COST OF GD SOL 6324. 05/16/00 $57.78 AUGIE'S INC. SANDWICHES 30944 FRED RICHA_RDS. COST OF GD SOL 6324 < *> $188.16* 210263 05/16/00 $20.38 AUTO MACHINE AND SUPPLY PLUG D3625 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI 2072 < *> $20.38* 210264 05/16/00 $442.63 AUTOMATED ENTRANCE PRODU DOOR REPAIR 20183 VERNON OCCUPAN EQUIP MAINT < *> $442.63* 210265 05/16/00 $46.36 AUTOMOBILE SERVICE CO. ALIGN FRONT 21835 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 1121 < *> $46.36* 210266 05/16/00 $234.29 BATTERIES PLUS BATTERY REPL. FOR LAP F5 -25083 POLICE DEPT. G DATA PROCESSIN 3197 05/16/00 $60.33 BATTERIES PLUS BATTERIES F5 -26253 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1327 6 . I COUNCIL r CHECK _STER 10 -MAY -2000 (1 _>__1) page 3 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ < *> $294.62* 210267 05/16/00 $940.02 BATTERY WHOLESALE INC. BATTERIES 09113 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1300 < *> $940.02* 210268 05/16/00 $120.00 BCA /TRAINING & DEVELOPME CONT. ED. (STEVE STRO T009105 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS 3031 < *> $120.00* 210269 05/16/00 $350.00 BEARCOM RADIO SERVICE 1537128 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONTR REPAIRS < *> $350.00* 210270 05/16/00 $410.56 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS REPAIR RESURFACER 00020337 ARENA ICE MAIN CONTR REPAIRS 8096 < *> $410.56* 210271 05/16/00 $24.00 BEER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE CLEAN BEER LINES 3844 GRILL SVC CONTR EQUI 6325 < *> $24.00* 210272 05/16/00 $109.08 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 31689400 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 05/16/00 $1,159.00 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 18774000 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU • 05/16/00 $102.00 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 18792800 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 05/16/00 $84.00 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 18792800 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 $289.75 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 18796300 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU . 05/16/00 $289.75 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 18796400 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 05/16/00 $48.35 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 31758600 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 05/16/00 $15.64 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 31758700 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 05/16/00 $144.08 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 31758800 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 05/16/00 $1,506.05 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 18815600 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 $111.96 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 31797900 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $3,859.66* 210275 05/16/00 $37.22 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 7584710 POLICE DEPT. G OFFICE SUPPLIE 3015 05/16/00 - $39.72 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT SHIPPING TAGS CM756195 POLICE DEPT. G OFFICE SUPPLIE 3186 05/16/00 $49.06 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT INDEX SHEETS, BINDERS 7603210 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 1154 05/16/00 $25.53 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 7604740 ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLI 05/16/00 $123.36 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 7604740 PARK ADMIN. GENERAL SUPPLI 05/16/00 $49.26 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 7599891 ENGINEERING GE GENERAL SUPPLI 05/16/00 $610.29 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT LAB FURNITURE 7606650 LABORATORY GENERAL SUPPLI 1158 05/16/00 $3.38 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT HIGHLIGHTER PENS 7606670 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 1158 05/16/00 $288.83 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT RECORDER, EASEL, HOLE 7607200 POLICE DEPT. G OFFICE SUPPLIE 3000 05/16/00 $79.96 BERTELSON OFFICE- PRODUCT CHAIR, DELIVERY CHARG 7607260 POLICE DEPT. G OFFICE SUPPLIE 3017 05/16/00 $86.21 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 7607910 ARENA ADMINIST OFFICE SUPPLIE 8097 05/16/00 $18.37 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES S006306 FINANCE GENERAL SUPPLI 05/16/00 $35.15 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE STAMPS 5006336 POLICE DEPT. G OFFICE SUPPLIE 3186 05/16/00 $16.17 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 7610380 POLICE DEPT. G OFFICE SUPPLIE 3016 05/16/00 $104.22 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT CASSETTE 7607201 POLICE DEPT. G OFFICE SUPPLIE 3000 05/16/00 $30.63 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT SCISSORS, CORRECTION 7616610 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 1252 05/16/00 - $25.78 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT BACKREST CM747877 POLICE DEPT. G OFFICE SUPPLIE 3162 05/16/00 $60.13 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT SHIPPING TAGS 7619340 POLICE DEPT. G OFFICE SUPPLIE 3007 05/16/00 $68.96 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 7620570 ARENA ADMINIST OFFICE SUPPLIE 8009 05/16/00 $67.69 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 7623670 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI 05/16/00 $42.60 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 7623671 CENT SVC GENER OFFICE SUPPLIE 05/16/00 $41.00 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 7629220 ARENA ADMINIST OFFICE SUPPLIE 8097 05/16/00 $74.28 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT MARKERS 7629280 GOLF ADMINISTR OFFICE SUPPLIE 6017 05/16/00 $162.73 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 7631490 FIRE DEPT. GEN OFFICE SUPPLIE 3822 05/16/00 - $19.93 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT CREDIT CM607910 ARENA ADMINIST OFFICE SUPPLIE COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 10 -MAY -2000 (13:31) page 4 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 210275 05/16/00 - $36.35 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT CREDIT CM762057 ARENA ADMINIST OFFICE SUPPLIE 8097 05/16/00 $116.14 BERTELSON OFFICE .PRODUCT FANS & STAMP 7640320 LIQUOR YORK GE OFFICE SUPPLIE 7535 05/16/00 $37.46 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT STORAGE BOXES 7644020 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 1336 05/16/00 $7.68 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 7648050 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI 05/16/00 $56.74 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 7648050 ASSESSING GENERAL SUPPLI 05/16/00 $273.83 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 7648050 ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLI 05/16/00 $34.08 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT RUBBER STAMP S006288 POLICE DEPT. G OFFICE SUPPLIE 3007 < *> $2,479.18* 210276 05/16/00 $107.50 BESSER GLASS & MIRROR GLASS 20927 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI 1149 < *> $107.50* 210277 05/16/00 $107.78 BEST ACCESS SYSTEMS OF M KEYS, CORE MN -11601 CITY HALL GENE REPAIR PARTS 5868 05/16/00 $51.00 BEST ACCESS SYSTEMS OF M GENERAL SUPPLIES MN -11625 ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPLI 8.078 05/16/00 $8.35 BEST ACCESS SYSTEMS OF M GENERAL SUPPLIES MN -11649 ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPLI 8012 < *> $167.13* 210278 05/16/00 $47.87 BEST BUY COMPANY INC. CORD DETANGLER 00504185 GOLF ADMINISTR OFFICE SUPPLIE 6003 < *> $47.87* 210279 05/16/00 $500.80 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS BLACKTOP 79751 DISTRIBUTION BLACKTOP 5994 05/16/00 $101.61 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS BLACKTOP 79751 GENERAL MAINT BLACKTOP 5994 05/16/00 $53.25 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS BLACKTOP 79751 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 5994 05/16/00 $1,064.43 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS ASPHALT 79759 DISTRIBUTION BLACKTOP 5994 < *> $1,720..09* 210280 05/16/00 $1,682.05 BKPV & ASSOCIATES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 18174 CONTINGENCIES PROF SERVICES < *> $1,682.05* 210281 05/16/00 $117.00 BLACK, STEVE SOFTBALL UMPIRE 050200 EDINA ATHLETIC PROF SERVICES < *> $117.00* 210282 05/16/00 $458.59 BLACKHAWK INDUSTRIES INC MEDICAL VESTS 077347 POLICE DEPT.. G EQUIP REPLACEM 3014 < *> $458.59* 210283 05/16/00 $458.00 Blue Ocean Software Inc TRACK -IT! UPGRADE 26895 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI 4734 < *> $458.00* 210284 05/16/00 $302.19 BOART LONGYEAR CO. RACKSTRAP 625233 GENERAL MAINT TOOLS 1253 05/16/00 $280.96 BOART LONGYEAR CO. RACK STRAPS 626435 GENERAL MAINT TOOLS 1283 < *> $583.15* 210285 05/16/00 $103.45 BOYER TRUCK PARTS CAP & GASKET 138283 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1115 05/16/00 $32.98 BOYER TRUCK PARTS HOSES 142811 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1307 < *> $136.43* 210286 05/16/00 $958.50 BRAEMAR PRINTING LOGO ENVELOPES 53766 GOLF ADMINISTR PRINTING 6473 < *> $958.50* 210287 05/16/00 $663.00 BRAKKE, KEITH SOFTBALL UMPIRE 050200 EDINA ATHLETIC PROF SERVICES < *> $663.00* 210288 05/16/00 $3,200.00 BRAUN INTERTEC SOIL BORINGS 188963 SANITARY SEWER CIP < *> $3,200.00* COUNCIL CHECK ISTER 10 -MAY -2000 (1_1) page 5 CHECK NO -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------=------------------ DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 210289 05/16/00 $37,935.20 BROWNING FERRIS-INDUSTRI RECYCLING 70000780 RECYCLING Recycling Char < *> $37,935.20* 210290 05/16/00 $5,087.35 BROWNING FERRIS INDUSTRI REFUSE 10936570 50TH STREET RU PROF SERVICES < *> $5,087.35* 210291 05/16/00 $170.39 BRYAN ROCK - PRODUCTS INC. ROCK PRODUCTS 4/30 STM STREET RENOVAT GENERAL SUPPLI 5997 05/16/00 $777.38 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC. ROCK PRODUCTS 4/30 STM GENERAL STORM GENERAL SUPPLI 5997 05/16/00 $784.98 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC. ROCK PRODUCTS 4/30 STM GENERAL STORM GENERAL SUPPLI 5997 05/16/00 $361.75 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC. ROCK PRODUCTS 4/30 STM PATHS & HARD S SAND,GRVL & RO 5997 05/16/00 $301.17 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC. ROCK PRODUCTS 4%30 STM PATHS & HARD S BLACKTOP 5997 < *> $2,395.67* 210292 05/16/00 $489.14 CAMAS READY MIX CEMENT 1129702 STREET RENOVAT CONCRETE 1766 05/16/00 $206.18 CAMAS READY MIX CEMENT 1129703 STREET RENOVAT CONCRETE 1766 05/16/00 $258.32 CAMAS CURB READY -MIX 1130430 DISTRIBUTION BLACKTOP 5998 05/16/00 $963.56 CAMAS READY -MIX CONCRETE 1130431 DISTRIBUTION CONCRETE 5998 05/16/00 $221.41 CAMAS HANDCURB 1131105 DISTRIBUTION CONCRETE 5998 05/16/00 $279.99 CAMAS HANDCURB 1131106 DISTRIBUTION BLACKTOP 5998 < *> $2,418.60* 210293 05/16/00 $576.00 CAMPBELL GROUP, THE UNIFORM SHIRTS 21862 CENTENNIAL LAK LAUNDRY 2066 < *> $576.00* 210294 05/16/00 $279.51 CAMPBELL PET COMPANY PET SUPPLIES 0098292- ANIMAL CONTROL GENERAL SUPPLI 3009 < *> $279.51* 210295 05/16/00 $1,529.07 CAPITAL FACTORS INC SHIRTS 1520497 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6220 < *> $1,529.07* 210296 05/16/00 $35.68 CARGILL, CYNTHIA OVERPD WATER BILL /532 050100 UTILITY PROG ACCOUNTS REC. < *> $35.68* 210297 05/16/00 $324.83 CARLSON PRINTING BUSINESS CARDS 00074011 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $324.83* 210298 05/16/00 $30.00 CARLSON, BRUCE REFUND - GIFT CERTIFI 050100 GOLF DOME GOLF DOME RECP < *> $30.00* 210299 05/16/00 $27.00 CARLSON, JOANNA CLASS REFUND 042700 ART CNTR PROG REGISTRATION F < *> $27.00* 210300 05/16/00 $370.96 CARLSON, KENNETH UNIFORMS /CLOTHING 042800 POLICE DEPT. G UNIF ALLOW < *> $370.96* 210301 05/16/00 $1,000.00 CARMEL, TONI L. EASEMENT ACQUISITION 042500 SANITARY SEWER CIP < *> $1,000.00* 210302 05/16/00 $430.47 CATCO REPAIR PUMP 3 -28316 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1101 < *> $430.47* 210303 05/16/00 $87.68 CERAMIC ARTS & SUPPLIES TOOLS 29361 ART SUPPLY GIF COST OF GD SOL 9158 < *> $87.68* 210304 05/16/00 $160.00 CHAD NESTOR & ASSOCIATES SUMMER 2000 BROCHURE 050300 ADAPTIVE RECRE PRINTING COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 10 -MAY -2000 (13:31) page 6 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <*> $160.00* 210305 05/16/00 $690.67 CIT GROUP /COMMERCIAL SE APPAREL 153730 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6227 05/16/00 $698.74 CIT GROUP /COMMERCIAL SER APPAREL 153746 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6227 < *> $1,389.41* 210306 05/16/00 $45.00 CITY OF FARIBAULT HPB WORKSHOP 811 PLANNING CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $45.00* 210307 05/16/00 $6.40 CITY OF RICHFIELD LIGHT & POWER 9602205 GENERAL STORM LIGHT & POWER PER AGRE < *> $6.40* 210308 05/16/00 $15.71 CITY WIDE WINDOW SERVICE WINDOW CLEANING 156943 50TH ST O.CCUPA CONTR REPAIRS 05/16/00 $25.56 CITY WIDE WINDOW SERVICE WINDOW CLEANING 156943 YORK OCCUPANCY CONTR REPAIRS 05/16/00 $15.71- CITY WIDE WINDOW SERVICE WINDOW CLEANING 156943 VERNON OCCUPAN CONTR REPAIRS < *> $56.98* 210309 05/16/00 $134.34 CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP. PROXIMITY SWITCHES 24440 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 5875 05/16/00 $1,241.25 CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP. E -81 FAN CLUTCH 55446 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 3776 < *> $1,375.59* 210310 05/16/00 $346.13 COMMERCIAL FURNITURE BRO TRACT CHAIR 00715383 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP REPLACEM 05/16/00 $883.42 COMMERCIAL FURNITURE BRO REMODELING 00715665 CITY HALL . EQUIP REPLACEM 4742 05/16/00 $692.25 COMMERCIAL FURNITURE BRO CHAIR 00715666 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP REPLACEM 3198 05/16/00 $101.18 COMMERCIAL FURNITURE BRO REMODELING 00715728 CITY HALL EQUIP REPLACEM 4743 < *> $2,022.98* 210311 05/16/00 $435.45 COMPLETE BEVERAGE SERVIC VOLUNTEER RECOGNITION 21699 CONTINGENCIES GENERAL SUPPLI 4744 < *> $435.45* 210312 05/16/00 $63.78 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS EAR PLUGS, COUGH DROP 01209392 GENERAL MAINT SAFETY EQUIPME 1246 05/16/00 $161.89 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS PODS, GLOVES, SUNSCRE 01218158 EQUIPMENT OPER SAFETY EQUIPME 1337 < *> $225.67* 210313 05/16/00 $142.60 CONSTRUCTION BULLETIN MA AD CB96970 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LE 05/16/00 $618.45 CONSTRUCTION BULLETIN MA ADS FOR BID CB97802 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LE 05/16/00 $142.60 CONSTRUCTION BULLETIN MA AD FOR BID CB98351 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LE < *> $903.65* 210314 05/16/00 $138.00 COOK INCORPORATED AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 11772.80 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 3796 < *> $138.00* 210315 05/16/00 $3,350.00 CORNERSTONE INTERVENTION & ADVOCA 042400 HUMAN RELATION PROF SERVICES < *> $3,750.00* 210316 05/16/00 $66.36 CORPORATE EXPRESS DELIVE COURIER 131754 ADMINISTRATION PROF SERVICES < *> $66.36* 210317 05/16/00 $100.00 CROSBY LAKE CLATTERERS PERFORMANCE 6 -1 -2000 050800 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $100.00* 210318 05/16/00 $392.40 CUTTER & BUCK CLOTHING 521791 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6225 05/16/00 $64.32 CUTTER & BUCK APPAREL 521810 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6225 05/16/00 $29.48 CUTTER & BUCK SHIRTS 522520 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6226 < *> $486.20* COUNCIL 'CHECK ISTER 10 -MAY -2000 (1- mil) page 7 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 210319 05/16/00 $2,471.20 CY'S UNIFORMS UNIFORMS 042800 FIRE DEPT. GEN UNIF ALLOW 3810 05/16/00 $3,557.49 CY'S UNIFORMS UNIFORMS APR FIRE DEPT. GEN UNIF ALLOW < *> $6,028.69* 210320 05/16/00 $622.79 CYLINDER CITY INC. EXHAUST PARTS & LABOR 127747 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1120 < *> $622.79* 210321 05/16/00 - $624.14 DANKO EMERGENCY EQUIPMEN RESCUE LITTER 321046 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 3680 05/16/00 $637.13 DANKO EMERGENCY EQUIPMEN RESCUE LITTER 322518 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 3680 05/16/00 $41.10 DANKO EMERGENCY EQUIPMEN SPANNER WRENCH 322910 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 3817 < *> $54.09* 210322 05/16/00 $369.61 DATREK PROFESSIONAL BAGS GOLF BAGS 607941 PRO SHOP COST-OF GDS -PR 6208 < *> $369.61* 210323 05/16/00 $2,206.10 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 93597 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 05/16/00 $18.40 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 93598 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 05/16/00 $2,062.15 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 93599 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 05/16/00 $55.20 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 93600 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 05/16/00 $705.25 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 94283 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 05/16/00 $920.85 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 94422 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 05/16/00 $36.00 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 94423 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 05/16/00 $18.40 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 94424 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 05/16/00 $1,445.90 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 94425 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 05/16/00 $1,520.00 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 94802 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE . < *> $8,9.88.25* 210324 05/16/00 $106.45 DEALER AUTOMOTIVE SERVIC ALARM, LABOR 1- 015508 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 1288 < *> $106.45* 210325 05/16/00 $102.20 DELEGARD TOOL CO. TOOLS 10501 MAINT OF LOURS TOOLS 6586 < *> $102.20* 210326 05/16/00 $1,763.40 DELI DOUBLE CATERING 52723 CONTINGENCIES GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $1,763.40* 210327 05/16/00 $60.96 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKEREY BAKERY 33056 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6329 05/16/00 $53.07 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKEREY BAKERY 33363 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6329 05/16/00 $32.15 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKEREY BAKERY 33384 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6329 05/16/00 $36.73 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKEREY BAKERY 33589 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6329 05/16/00 $77.54 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKEREY BAKERY 33673 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6329 < *> $260.45* 210329 05/16/00 $69.57 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRA TELEPHONE W0003065 SKATING & HOCK TELEPHONE 05/16/00 $16.00 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRA TELEPHONE W0003065 COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 05/16/00 $60.59 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRA TELEPHONE W0003065 50TH ST OCCUPA TELEPHONE 05/16/00 $91.07 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRA TELEPHONE W0003065 YORK OCCUPANCY TELEPHONE 05/16/00 $60.04 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRA TELEPHONE W0003065 VERNON OCCUPAN TELEPHONE 05/16/00 $46.32 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRA HISTORICAL W0003065 BUILDING MAINT TELEPHONE 05/16/00 $15.01 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRA ARNESON W0003065 BUILDING MAINT TELEPHONE 05/16/00 $15.01 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRA GREENHOUSE W0003065 BUILDING MAINT TELEPHONE 05/16/00 $29.16 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRA CARD ACCESS -PARKS W0003065 BUILDING MAINT TELEPHONE 05/16/00 $33.44 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRA TELEPHONE W0003065 SENIOR CITIZEN TELEPHONE 05/16/00 $44.60 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRA TELEPHONE W0003065 POOL OPERATION TELEPHONE 05/16/00 $89.63 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRA TELEPHONE W0003065 YORK FIRE STAT TELEPHONE COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 10 -MAY -2000 (13:31) page 8 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE - PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 210329 05/16/00 $75.05 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRA TELEPHONE W0003065 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE 05/16/00 $112.25 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRA TELEPHONE W0003065 ART CENTER BLD TELEPHONE 05/16/00 $234.70 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRA TELEPHONE W0003065 ED ADMINISTRAT TELEPHONE 05/16/00 $14.58 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRA TELEPHONE W0003065 ARENA BLDG /GRO TELEPHONE 05/16/00 $82.87 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRA TELEPHONE W0003065 GOLF DOME TELEPHONE 05/16/00 $71.49 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRA TELEPHONE W0003066 CLUB HOUSE' TELEPHONE < *> $1,161.38* 210330 05/16/00 $24.00 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAF 8 "FIRE" LICENSE PLAT 042800 FIRE DEPT. GEN LIC & PERMITS < *> $24.00* 210331 05/16/00 $243.24 DIAMOND ART & CRAFT DIST PALETTE, POTTERY TOOL 190205 ART SUPPLY GIF COST OF GD SOL 9019 < *> $243.24* 210332 05/16/00 $32.02 DIRECT SAFETY COMPANY SAFETY GLASSES 15179620 BUILDING MAINT SAFETY EQUIPME 1155 < *> $32.02 *. 210333 05/16/00 $627.64 DON HARSTAD CO INC SECURITY SYSTEM INSTA 114730 KEYLESS ENTRY PROF SERVICES 7089 < *> $627.64* 210334 05/16/00 $5,774.70 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP LEGAL 770099 LEGAL SERVICES PRO SVC - LEGA < *> $5,774.70* 210335 05/16/00 $195.97 DRAPER, TOM CONTINUING ED (ADVANC 050100 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $195.97* 210336 05/16/00 $11.37 E -Z -GO TEXTRON CART PARTS 0494360 GOLF CARS REPAIR PARTS 6595 < *> $11.37* 210337 05/16/00 $45.48 E.I.P.A. BARINGTON RETIREMENT 042800 CIVIL DEFENSE GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $45.48* 210338 05/16/00 05/16/00 05/16/00 05/16,/00 05/16/00 05/16/00 05/16/00 05/16/00 05/16/00 210339 05/16/00 210340 05/16/00 05/16/00 05/16/00 05/16/00 05/16/00 05/16/00 05/16/00 05/16/00 05/16/00 -$7.04 $769.43 .$311.03 $3,902.38 - $35.49 $291.00 $1,029.14 $921.73 $1,125.12 $8,307.30* $319.50 $319.50* $5,879.65 $12.15 $1,588.20 $4,100.90 $160.00 $1,471.30 $315.30 $2,017.45 $2,077,45 EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EARL F. ANDERSEN INC EAST SIDE BEVERAGE EAST SIDE BEVERAGE EAST SIDE BEVERAGE EAST SIDE BEVERAGE EAST SIDE BEVERAGE EAST SIDE BEVERAGE EAST SIDE BEVERAGE EAST SIDE BEVERAGE EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 535208 SOLD WI 207532 SOLD WI 207537 SOLD WI 207541 SOLD WI 536023 SOLD WI 209186 SOLD WI 211267 SOLD WI 211269 SOLD WI 211270 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE SIGNS FOR SHELTERS 23944 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 1197 COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 619943 SOLD MI 619944 SOLD BE 619945 SOLD BE 620534 SOLD BE 621143 SOLD BE 621789 SOLD BE 621856 SOLD BE 622994 SOLD BE 622995 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE COUNCIL, CHECK _ SISTER 10 -MAY -2000 (1- .1) page 9 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 210340 05/16/00 $12.15 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 622996 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 05/16/00 $5,173.15 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 623605 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE < *> $22,807.70* 210341 05/16/00 $465.31 EASY PICKER GOLF PRODUCT YARDAGE SIGN 209371 RANGE GENERAL SUPPLI 6012 < *> $465.31* 210342 05/16/00 $106.29 ECOLAB PEST ELIMINATION SPRAY FOR BUGS 6766482 POOL TRACK GRE SVC CONTR EQUI CONTRACT < *> $106.29* 210343 05/16/00 $13.01 EDINA CLEANERS LINEN CLEANING 150308,1 POOL TRACK GRE LAUNDRY 2256 < *> $13.01* 210344 05/16/00 $250.00 EFFECTIVE MARKETING COMM ABOUT TOWN HISTORICAL 229 COMMUNICATIONS MAG /NEWSLET EX < *> $250.00* 210345 05/16/00 $200.00 - EKLUND TREE RECYCLING TREE WASTE 050100 TREES & MAINTE SALARIES OT RE 5917 < *> $200.00* 210346 05/16/00 $319.50 ELECTION SYSTEM & SOFTWA 2 DEMONSTRATION KITS 425610 ELECTION GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $319.50* 210347 05/16/00 $164,184.60 ENCOMM MIDWEST LLC PARTIAL PAYMENT #6 051600 UTILITY PROG CIP < *> $164,184.60* 210348 05/16/00 $166.79 ENERGY MANAGEMENT INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 002281 ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPLI 8004 < *> $166.79* 210349 05/16/00 $12.72 ERV'S LAWN MOWER REPAIR IGNITION SWITCH 26799 BUILDING MAINT REPAIR PARTS 5757 05/16/00 $5.00 ERV'S LAWN MOWER REPAIR INTEREST INTEREST EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS < *> $17.72* 210350 05/16/00 $1,347.20 EVERGREEN LAND SERVICES EASEMENT ACQUISITION 00 -350 TH100 & W 77TH CIP < *> $1,347.20* 210351 05/16/00 $100.00 EWG DUES FOR DIRECTORY 042800 GOLF ADMINISTR DUES & SUBSCRI. < *> $100.00* 210352 05/16/00 $2,688.00 EXPERT T BILLING APRIL BILLING 050400 FIRE DEPT. GEN PROF SERVICES < *> $2,688.00* 210353 05/16/00 $1,456.00 EXPLORERS POST 925 CONTINUING ED 050400 RESERVE PROGRA CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $1,456.00* 210354 05/16/00 $621.00 FALCONER, SIDNEY AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 042800 GENERAL FD PRO AMBULANCE FEES < *> $621.00* 210355 05/16/00 - $44.13 FAST FOTO & DIGITAL CREDIT 4/30 STA ART CENTER ADM GENERAL SUPPLI 05/16/00 $89.48 FAST FOTO & DIGITAL FILM & DEVELOPING T2 -50568 ART CENTER ADM GENERAL SUPPLI 9040 < *> $45.35* 210356 05/16/00 $164.54 FASTSIGNS BLOOMINGTON SIGNS B15253 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI 2082 < *> $164.54* 210357 05/16/00 $174.90 FISHER SCIENTIFIC LAB SUPPLIES 4162758 LABORATORY GENERAL SUPPLI 1264 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 10 -MAY -2000 (13:31) page 10 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <*> $174.90* 210358 05/16/00 $46.34 FOOTJOY SHOES 3686342 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6210 05/16/00 $62.21 FOOTJOY SHOES 3698653 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6210 < *> $108.55* 210359 05/16/00 $100.00 FRAGALE, ANNETTE KIDS SHOW 5 -18 -00 042500 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $100.00* 210360 05/16/00 $238.05 FRAME, SUSAN PAINT BRUSHES 042400 ART SUPPLY GIF COST OF GD SOL 9025 < *> $238.05* 210361 05/16/00 $82.84 FREEWAY DODGE INC. STRAP, FUEL 47186DOW EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1301 < *> $82.84* 210362 05/16/00 $155.49 FREEWAY RADIATOR SERVICE RADIATOR 26898, EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 1298 < *> $155.49* 210363 05/16/00 $190.87 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 042800 ARENA BLDG /GRO LAUNDRY 05/16/00 $302.77 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 042800 EQUIPMENT OPER LAUNDRY 05/16/00 $37.40 G'& K SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES 042800 STREET REVOLVI GENERAL SUPPLI 05/16/00 $79.56 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 042800 PUMP & LIFT ST LAUNDRY 05/16/00 $540.27 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 042800 GENERAL MAINT LAUNDRY 05/16/00 $191.08 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 042800 BUILDING MAINT LAUNDRY 05/16/00 $27.12 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 042800 CITY HALL GENE LAUNDRY 05/16/00 $155.14 G & K SERVICES CLEANING SUPPLIES 042800 PW BUILDING CLEANING SUPPL < *> $1,524.21* 210364 05/16/00 $107.20 GALLS INC. OUTLET STROBE POWER S 53950634 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP MAINT 3189 05/16/00 $85.77 GALLS INC. REMOTE STROBE TUBES 53950634 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP MAINT 3189 < *> $192.97* 210365 05/16/00 $793.00 GARTNER REFRIGERATION & REPAIR REFRIG. SYSTEM 2097 ARENA ICE MAIN CONTR REPAIRS 8007 < *> $793.00* 210366 05/16/00 $375.00 GCSAA 2000 DUES 050500 GOLF ADMINISTR DUES & SUBSCRI < *> $375.00* 210367 05/16/00 $195.50 GE CAPITAL ITS INK TONER 90789960 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI 4716 05/16/00 $2,893.69 GE CAPITAL ITS NEW EQUIPMENT 90800670 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP REPLACEM 3175 05/16/00 $279.15 GE CAPITAL ITS OFFICE 2K UPGRADE 90805259 FIRE DEPT. GEN OFFICE SUPPLIE 4746 < *> $3,368.34* 210368 05/16/00 $505.85 GENERAL SPORTS CORPORATI BASKETBALL T- SHIRTS 5467 ADAPTIVE RECRE GENERAL SUPPLI 05/16/00 $192.60 GENERAL SPORTS CORPORATI FLOOR TAPE 55548 POOL TRACK GRE GENERAL SUPPLI 2236 < *> $698.45* 210369 05/16/00 $321.00 GLEWWE DOORS INC. EXIT DEVICE INSTALL 90379 CITY HALL GENE GENERAL SUPPLI 5785 .05/16/00 $321.00 GLEWWE DOORS INC. EXIT DEVICE INSTALL 90379 POLICE DEPT. G SAFETY EQUIPME < *> $642.00* 210370 05/16/00 $236.90 GO SPORTSMEN'S SUPPLY IN BUTTSTOCK MAG POUCH 11822 POLICE DEPT. G AMMUNITION 3160 < *> $236.90* 210371 05/16/00 $290.00 GOLFCRAFT CLUBS 13355 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6358 COUNCIL CHECK . SISTER 10 -MAY -2000 (13:.,1) page 11 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 210371 05/16/00 $145.00 GOLFCRAFT CLUBS 13413 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6358 05/16/00 $145.00 GOLFCRAFT GOLF CLUBS 13436 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6358 05/16/00 $580.00 GOLFCRAFT GOLF CLUBS 13438 . PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6358 05/16/00 $290.00. GOLFCRAFT GOLF CLUBS 13441 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6358 < *> $1,450.00* 210372 05/16/00 $138.99 GOPHER CASH REGISTER REGISTER TAPE 21200 RANGE GENERAL SUPPLI 6035 < *> $138.99* 210373 05/16/00 $900.00 GRAFIX SHOPPE VEHICLE 75 &-76 GRAPH 11448 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONTR REPAIRS < *> $900.00* 210374 05/16/00 $120.96 GRAINGER BELT 495 -8207 POOL TRACK GRE REPAIR PARTS 3439 05/16/00 $219.08 GRAINGER FIXTURE, MOUNTING HOO 495 -1951 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 5216 05/16/00 $179.96 GRAINGER LUMBER 973 -8032 BUILDING MAINT LUMBER 5353 05/16/00 $49.52 GRAINGER TAPER ARBOR, CHUCK W/ 970 -8802 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 1291 05/16/00 $15.98 GRAINGER CHUCK W /KEY 970 -9926 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI 2074 05/16/00 $85.68 GRAINGER AIR TANK, WRENCH, PLI 495 -1997 WATER TREATMEN GENERAL SUPPLI 1280 05/16/00 $71.67 GRAINGER LIGHT BULBS 495 -3936 CLUB HOUSE LIGHT & POWER 6020 < *> $742.85* 210375 05/16/00 $2,116.00 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 30736 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 $1,703.00 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 30805 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 $152.00 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 30821 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 $259.00 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 30822 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 $50.31 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 30823 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 $208.00 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 31004 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 $198.00 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 31010 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $4,686.31* 210376 05/16/00 $40.92 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. DIST DEVICE, POWER TA 500 -5505 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 1332 05/16/00 $88.44 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. DIMMER SWITCH 104 -7509 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 1331 05/16/00 $91.43 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. BATTERY 104 -7523 POOL TRACK GRE GENERAL SUPPLI 2253 < *> $220.79* 210377 05/16/00 .$225.00 GREER, PAT ART PROGRAMS FOR MAY 042400. ED ADMINISTRAT PROF SERVICES' < *> $225.00* 210380 05/16/00 - $20.00 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 534287 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/16/00 - $30.00 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 534288 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/16/00 - $25.89 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 535447 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 - $50.00 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 535719 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 05/16/00 - $77.36- GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 535773 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 05/16/00 - $38.40 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 535816 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/16/00 - $76.60 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 535817 50TH ST SELLIN CST.OF GD WINE 05/16/00 $224.25 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 207531 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 05/16/00 $64.60 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 207533 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 $69.10 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 207535 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 05/16/00 $1,223.38 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 207536 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/16/00 $814.48 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 207539 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 05/16/00 $45.88 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 207540 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 05/16/00 $1,386.10 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 207542 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/16/00 $45.88 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 207543 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 05/16/00 $64.60 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 207544 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 $64.00 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 207960 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 10 -MAY -2000 (13:31) page 12 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------=------------------------------ 210380 05/16/00 - $16.89 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 536007 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 05/16/00 $17,605.10 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 208314 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/16/00 $4,035.00 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 209184 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/16/00 $3,176.84 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 210881 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/16/00 $622.15 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 210884 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 05/16/00 $4,686.29 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 210887 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/16/00 $73.05 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 210888 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 05/16/00 $198.40 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 210890 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 05/16/00 $253.56 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 210891 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU < *> $34,317.52* 210381 05/16/00 $85.55 GRIGGS COOPER & COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 3898 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $85.55* 210382 05/16/00 - $40.00 GRINDELAND, KEN ART DEMO 5 -18 -00 042500 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $40.00* 210383 05/16/00 $18,572.00 GROSSMAN CHEVROLET COMPA NEW VECHICLE 74611 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP REPLACEM 3148 < *> $18,572.00* 210384 05/16/00 $112.40 HACH COMPANY LAB CHEMICALS 2334965 LABORATORY GENERAL SUPPLI 1263 < *> $112.40* 210385 05/16/00 $267.28 HALLMAN OIL COMPANY 5W -30 BULK 34603 EQUIPMENT OPER WELDING SUPPLI 1042 05/16/00 $437.98 HALLMAN OIL COMPANY BULK 15W -40 OIL 34604 EQUIPMENT OPER WELDING SUPPLI 1042 < *> $705.26* 210386 05/16/00 $77.96 HAMCO DATA PRODUCTS CREDIT CARD RIBBONS 203085 LIQUOR YORK GE GENERAL SUPPLI 7515 < *> $77.96* 210387 05/16/00 $194.00 HARRIS BILLINGS COMPANY REPAIR 1008362 ARENA BLDG /GRO CONTR REPAIRS 8089 < *> $194.00* 210388 05/16/00 $587.00 HARRIS COMPANIES REPLACE POOL PIPING 73267 POOL TRACK GRE CONTR REPAIRS 2232 < *> $587.00* 210389 05/16/00 $108.56 HAWKEYE FOODSERVICE DIST BRATS 1579808 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6333 05/16/00 - $62.64 HAWKEYE FOODSERVICE DIST SOAP CM158290 GRILL CLEANING SUPPL 6333 05/16/00 $768.95 HAWKEYE FOODSERVICE DIST FOOD /RESALE 1586576 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6333 05/16/00 $148.10 HAWKEYE FOODSERVICE DIST PAPER GOODS 1586576 GRILL GENERAL SUPPLI 05/16/00 $474.61 HAWKEYE FOODSERVICE DIST FOOD 1592089 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6333 05/16/00 $13.74 HAWKEYE FOODSERVICE DIST SALAD DRESSING 1592090 GRILL GENERAL SUPPLI 6333 05/16/00 $404.68 HAWKEYE FOODSERVICE DIST FOOD 1595110 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6333 05/16/00 - $26.46 HAWKEYE FOODSERVICE DIST FOOD CM159511 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6333 05/16/00 $17.00 HAWKEYE FOODSERVICE DIST FOOD 1597399 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6333 < *> $1,846.54* 210390 05/16/00 $82.50 HEGGIES PIZZA PIZZAS 48970 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6334 < *> $82.50* - 210391 05/16/00 $134.10 HEIMARK FOODS BURGERS 014347 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6335 < *> $134.10* 210392 05/16/00 $60.00 HEISTAD, KRISTI SWIMMING LESSON REFUN 050200 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F < *> $60.00* COUNCIL CHECK . .ISTER 10 -MAY -2000 (1� I page 13 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 210393 05/16/00 $42.47 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF SPECIAL REPAIR 1- 121 -21 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP MAINT 3024 < *> $42.47* 210394 05/16/00 $179.12 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF SPECIAL REPAIR 050100 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP MAINT < *> $179.12* 210395 05/16/00 $555.89 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF' BOOKING FEES - FEB. 0 042700 LEGAL SERVICES BRD & RM PRISO < *> $555.89* 210396 05/16/00 $508.00 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURE ROOM & BOARD CHARGES 002666 LEGAL SERVICES BRD & RM PRISO < *> $508.00* 210397 05/16/00 $5,304.50 HENNEPIN SOUTH SERVICES 1ST QTR. FUNDING 050200 COMM. RESOURCE PROF SERVICES < *> $5,304.50* 210398 05/16/00 $100.00 HINDING, CHRIS ALPHA BITS BAND 6 -6 -2 050800 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $100.00* 210399 05/16_/00 $415.35 HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MANUF ATHLETIC FIELD PAINT 50916 FIELD MAINTENA GENERAL SUPPLI 1169 < *> $415.35* 210400 05/16/00 $106.50 HOME JUICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 56659 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $106.50* 210401 05/16/00 $100.00 HONEYWELL INC. CARD READER REPAIR 603PS397 KEYLESS ENTRY PROF SERVICES 7092 < *> $100.00* 210402 05/16/00 $47.26 HOOFNAGLE, LYLE GENERAL SUPPLIES 050800 ART CENTER BLD.GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $47.26* 210403 05/16/00 $90.00 HOULE, JEANNIE TEACHING AT AC 050800 ART CENTER ADM ADVERTISING LE 05/16/00 $100.48 HOULE, JEANNIE CRAFT SUPPLIES 050800 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES < *> $190.48* 210405 05/16/00 $80.50 HOUSEHOLD BANK F.S.B. (K STEEL STRIPS, SCREWS, 0217 -419 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI 5890 05/16/00 $80.34 HOUSEHOLD BANK F.S.B. (K TAPE, BISQUITS, NAILS 0217 -419 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI 5891 05/16/00 $25.04 HOUSEHOLD BANK F.S.B. (K MOULDING, DISC, SCREW 0217 -419 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI 5929 05/16/00 - $24.20 HOUSEHOLD BANK F.S.B. (K CREDIT RETURN 0217 -419 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI 5890 05/16/00 $14.74 HOUSEHOLD BANK F.S.B. (K KNOBS, HINGES 0217 -419 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI 5932 05/16/00 $78.30 HOUSEHOLD BANK F.S.B. (K PARTICLE BOARD, STAPL- 0217 -421 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI 1059 05/16/00 $15.80 HOUSEHOLD BANK F.S.B. (K PARTICLE BOARD 0217 -421 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI 1062 05/16/00 $78.72 HOUSEHOLD BANK F.S.B. (K COUNTER TOP 0217 -422 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI 1067 05/16/00 $46.34 HOUSEHOLD BANK F.S.B. (K CONTACT CEMENT, BRUSH 0217 -422 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI 1076 05/16/00 $10.06 HOUSEHOLD BANK F.S.B. (K SHELF SUPPORTS 0217 -422 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI 1136 05/16/00 $28.98 HOUSEHOLD BANK F.S.B. (K PRECUT LAMINATE TOP 0217 -422 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI 1122 05/16/00 $88.35 HOUSEHOLD BANK F.S.B. (K LUMBER, BISQUITS, HIN 0217 -423 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 1152 05/16/00 $204.79 HOUSEHOLD BANK F.S.B. (K GENERAL SUPPLIES 0217 -423 ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPLI 8000 05/16/00 $22.40 HOUSEHOLD BANK F.S.B. (K LUMBER, SEALER, BRUSH 0217 -424 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 1259 05/16/00 $14.87 HOUSEHOLD BANK F.S.B. (K LUMBER 0217 -424 PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPLI 1262 05/16/00 $30.57 HOUSEHOLD BANK F.S.B. (K HAMMER 0217 -424 ENGINEERING GE GENERAL SUPPLI 4736 05/16/00 $142.58 HOUSEHOLD BANK F.S.B. (K STAKES, PAINT RAGS, S 0217 -424 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 1285 05/16/00 $76.67 HOUSEHOLD BANK F.S.B. (K SUPPLIES 0217 -424 MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPLI 6597 < *> $1,014.85* 210406 05/16/00 $9.03 HUEBSCH TOWELS 114748 POOL TRACK GRE SVC CONTR EQUI CONTRACT COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 10 -MAY -2000 (13:31) page 14 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 210406 05/16/00 $63.61 HUEBSCH TOWELS, LINENS 119338 POOL TRACK GRE SVC CONTR EQUI CONTRACT < *> $72.64* 210407 05/16/00 $4,035.92 HYDRO SUPPLY CO WATER METERS 0016482 - UTILITY PROG INVENTORY WATE 3671 05/16/00 $1,058.61 HYDRO SUPPLY CO SWIVEL CONNECTION, GA 0016483 - UTILITY PROG. INVENTORY WATE 3671 05/16/00 $603.06 HYDRO SUPPLY CO WATER METER 0016514- UTILITY PROG INVENTORY WATE 3671 < *> $5,697.59* 210408 05/16/00 $25.00 IJJAMES, MELISSA CONTINUING ED (FORCE 042100 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $25.00* 210409 05/16/00 $142.91 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS FAX MACHINE MAINTENAN 23623399 CENT SVC GENER SVC CONTR EQUI 4740 05/16/00 $38.88 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS EQUIPMENT RENTAL 23603335 ART CENTER ADM EQUIP RENTAL < *> $181.79* 210410 05/16/00 $36.63 INDEPENDENT EMERGENCY SE MOUSEPAD 310 POLICE DEPT. G OFFICE SUPPLIE 3003 < *> $36.63* 210411 05/16/00 $50.b0 INFERNO KENNELS CANINE REFUND - PARADE FEE 050200 SPECIAL ACTIVI PROF SERVICES < *> $50.00* 210412 05/16/00 $572.75 IPMA FIREFIGHTER EXAM 96163766 FIRE DEPT. GEN PROF SERVICES < *> $572.75* 210413 05/16/00 $948.41 IVERSON, KATHY REIMBURSEMENT FOR EXP 04/28 EDINA CHEM AWA GENERAL SUPPLI 05/16/00 $5,000.00 IVERSON, KATHY CHEMICAL HEALTH CONSU 042800 COMMUNICATIONS PROF SERVICES < *> $5,948.41* 210414 05/16/00 $119.25 IZZO SYSTEMS GOLF BAG 60522 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6030 < *> $119.25* 210415 05/16/00 $518.19 J -CRAFT INC. LIGHT KIT UPGRADE 24780 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $518.19* 210416 05/16/00 $83.07 J.H. LARSON COMPANY OCCUPANCY SENSOR 4168242- PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 1127 05/16/00 $162.09 J.H. LARSON COMPANY WIRE 4170067- PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 1255 < *> $245.16* 210417 05/16/00 $493.29 JEANE THORNE INC TEMP. SERVICES 00238528 INSPECTIONS PROF SERVICES < *> $493.29* 210418 05/16/00 $35.03 JERRY'S FOODS COST OF GOODS SOLD 4/19 STA GRILL COST OF GD SOL 05/16/00 $19.65 JERRY'S FOODS CLEANING SUPPLIES 4/19 STA GRILL CLEANING SUPPL 05/16/00 $32.89 JERRY'S FOODS GENERAL SUPPLIES 4/19 STA FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 05/16/00 $66.44 JERRY'S FOODS MEETING EXPENSE 4/19 STA FIRE DEPT. GEN MEETING EXPENS 05/16/00 $223.14 JERRY'S FOODS GENERAL SUPPLIES 4/19 STA ART CENTER ADM GENERAL SUPPLI 05/16/00 $74.63 JERRY'S FOODS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 4/19 STA TRAINING CONF & SCHOOLS 05/16/00 $4.45 JERRY'S FOODS GENERAL SUPPLIES 4/19 STA POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI 05/16/00 $64.43 JERRY'S FOODS SPECIAL MEETING 10 BOX L CITY COUNCIL MEETING EXPENS < *> $520..66* 210419 05/16/00 $149.10 JERRY'S PRINTING VOLUNTEER RECOGNITION A -14261 CONTINGENCIES GENERAL SUPPLI 4737 05/16/00 $1,881.80 JERRY'S PRINTING POOL BROCHURE A -14147 POOL ADMIN PRINTING 7091 < *> $2,030.90* COUNCIL CHECK _jISTER 10 -MAY -2000 (1_ .) page 15 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR 1. DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM--- - - - - -- OBJECT-- - - - PO NUM - ------------------------------------- 210420 05/16/00 - $71.78 - ------------------------------------------------------------- JIM LUPIENT S HAROLD CHE Return - Credit CM401000 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 05/16/00 $6.88 JIM LUPIENT'S HAROLD CHE CONNECTOR 50186CVW EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5642 05/16/00 $28.12 JIM LUPIENT'S HAROLD CHE PIPE ASSEMBLY 51554CVW EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5812 05/16/00 $17.89 JIM LUPIENT'S HAROLD CHE CONNECTOR 52138CVW EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5828 05/16/00 $255.34 JIM LUPIENT'S HAROLD CHE BRAKE PAD KITS 55342CVW EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 1293 < *> $236.45* 210423 05/16/00 $2,988.00 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1102974 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 $223.07 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1103014 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/16/00 - $79.94 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 119109 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/16/00 - $71.64 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 119110 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/16/00 - $30.69 -JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 119111 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 - $55.99 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 119112 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/16/00 - $130.69 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 119782 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/16/00 - $144.27 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 119783 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 - $23.74 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 119784 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 - $78.68 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 119785 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/16/00 $3,821.07 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1107832 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/16/00 $1,046.14 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1107833 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 05/16/00 $118.70 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1107834 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 $47.48 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1107835 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 $2,540.47 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1107836 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/16/00 $114.76 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF.GOODS SOLD MI 1107837 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 05/16/00 $64.49 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1107838 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 $296.90 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 1107839 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 05/16/00 $1,342.36 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1107840 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 $1,398.60 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1107841 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/16/00 $7,614.97 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1107842 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 $2,493.80 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1107843 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 - $143.69 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 120046 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/16/00 $1,392.38 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1109827 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 $2,790.81 JOHNSON BROTHERS,LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1110632 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/16/00 $1,067.13 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1110633 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 05/16/00 $286.46 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1110634 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 $23.74 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1110635 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 $5,247.27 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1110636 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/16/00 $261.14 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1110637 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 $456.82 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1110638 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 $228.16 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1110639 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/16/00 $564.24 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1110640 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 $71.02 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1110641 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/16/00 $1,358.69 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1110642 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $37,099.34* 210424 05/16/00 $51.40 JOHNSON, NAOMI CRAFT.SUPPLIES 050800 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES < *> $51.40* 210425 05/16/00 $14.65 JOHNSON, NAOMI ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 050800 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER 05/16/00 $142.40 JOHNSON, NAOMI CRAFT SUPPLIES 050800 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES 05/16/00 $32.12 JOHNSON, NAOMI GALLERY SUPPLIES 050800 ART SUPPLY GIF GENERAL SUPPLI 05/16/00 $27.20 JOHNSON, NAOMI MEDIA CRAFT SUPPLIES 050800 MEDIA LAB CRAFT SUPPLIES *> $216.37* 210426 05/16/00 $80.00 JUST FRIENDS BIG BAND PERFORMANCE 6 -7 -2000 050800 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $80.00* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 10 -MAY -2000 (13:31) page 16 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 210427 05/16/00 $108.10 JUSTUS LUMBER SUPPLIES 54410 MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPLI 6599 05/16/00 $242.78 JUSTUS LUMBER WHITE SLOTBOARD 55404 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI 1153 05/16/00 $105.91 JUSTUS LUMBER HARDBOARD, CUTTING 55830 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI 1188 < *> $456.79* 210428 05/16/00 $54.06 KAMAN INDUSTRIAL TECHNOL REPAIR PARTS Z184058 MAINT OF'COURS REPAIR PARTS 6589 05/16/00 $202.04 KAMAN INDUSTRIAL TECHNOL REPAIR PARTS Z184092 MAINT OF LOURS REPAIR PARTS 6589 < *> $256.10* 210429 05/16/00 $29.95 KANE, KENNETH POLICE MARKSMAN MAGAZ 042800 POLICE DEPT. G DUES & SUBSCRI < *> $29.95* 210430 05/16/00 $20.25 KASPRICK, JOHN MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 050100 VERNON OCCUPAN MILEAGE 05/16/00. $3.18 KASPRICK, JOHN GENERAL SUPPLIES 050100 VERNON OCCUPAN GENERAL SUPPLI 05/16/00 -$0.25 KASPRICK, JOHN CASH OVER AND UNDER 050100 VERNON OCCUPAN CASH OVER AND < *> $23.18* 210431 05/16/00 $104.10 KEPRIOS, JOHN VETERINARY CARE FOR G 14616 MAINT OF COURS PROF SERVICES < *> $104.10* 210432 05/16/00 $146.00 KIFFMEYER, WALLY SOFTBALL OFFICIAL 050200 EDINA ATHLETIC PROF SERVICES < *> "$146.00* 210433 05/16/00 $39.94 KINKO'S FLYERS 06220003 GOLF ADMINISTR PRINTING 6026 05/16/00 $36.21 KINKO'S BRAEMAR NEWS 06220003 GOLF ADMINISTR PRINTING 6022 < *> $76.15* 210434 05/16/00 $791.85 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 128810 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 $810.00 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 128812 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 $1,712.00 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 128814 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 $1,185.95 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 128834 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE. 05/16/00 $549.95 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 128835 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 $54.00 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 128913 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 05/16/00 $1,326.95 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 129110 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 $674.00 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 129212 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 $1,647.70 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 129217 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $8,752.40* 210435 05/16/00 $100.00 KNOCKNAGOW IRISH DANCERS PERFORMANCE 3 -23 -2000 050500 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $100.00* 210436 05/16/00 $36.44 KONTERS, VIK CONTINUING ED 041700 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS 05/16/00 $14.99 KONTERS, VIK REIMBURSEMENT FOR HEA 050300 POLICE DEPT. G CONTR REPAIRS < *> $51.43* 210437 05/16/00 $82,640.83 KOOLMO CONSTRUCTION INC. PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT 320 PARK CIP EQUIP REPLACEM CONTRACT < *> $82,640.83* 210438 05/16/00 $38.50 KRUKOW, SHEILA PARKING PERMIT REFUND 050500 STREET REVOLVI OTHER PERM & L < *> $38.50* . 210439 05/16/00 $51.95 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 266760 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 05/16/00 $311.50 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 266761 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 05/16/00 $573.80 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 266851 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 05/16/00 $86.40 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 267197 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE COUNCIL ,CHECK - ISTER 10 -MAY -2000 (13 page 17 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------7---------------------------- 210439 05/16/00 $1,367.15 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD BE-267349 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 05/16/00 $67.90 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 267402 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 05/16/00 $118.90 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 267551 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 05/16/00 $4,193.70 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 267552 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE < *> $6,771.30* 210440 05/16/00 $16,455.11 LABRECHE MURRAY LLC SPRING 2000 ABOUT TOW 01924 COMMUNICATIONS MAG /NEWSLET EX 05/16/00 $1,241.25 LABRECHE MURRAY LLC ADS - JAN, FEB, MARCH 01931 50TH ST SELLIN ADVERT OTHER 05/16/00 $1,241.25 LABRECHE MURRAY LLC ADS -'JAN, FEB, MARCH 01931 YORK SELLING ADVERT OTHER 05/16/00 $1,241.25 LABRECHE MURRAY LLC ADS - JAN, FEB, MARCH 01931 VERNON SELLING ADVERT OTHER < *> $20,178.86* 210441 05/16/00 $132.59 LAERDAL MEDICAL CORPORAT DEFIB PAD 1082124 POLICE DEPT. G SAFETY EQUIPME 3199 < *> - $132.59* 210442 05/16/00 $120.00 LAFOSTECASSE, SEAN FIELD REFUND 050300 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F < *> $120.00* 210443 05/16/00 $100.00 LAKE COUNTRY SCHOOL AUCTION CATALOG ADVER 041800 ART CENTER ADM ADVERT OTHER 9023 < *> $100.00* 210444 05/16/00 $462.50 LAKE RESTORATION INC LAKE MANAGEMENT 10832 CENTENNIAL LAK SVC CONTR EQUI CONTRACT < *> $462.50* 210445 05/16/00 $207.10 LANDS' END CORPORATE SAL LOGO SHIRTS 01158540 LIQUOR YORK GE GENERAL SUPPLI 05/16/00 $1,125.60 LANDS' END CORPORATE SAL UNIFORM SHIRTS 01160456 CENT SVC GENER ADVERT PERSONL < *> $1,332.70* 210446 05/16/00 $444.92 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. COTTER CLIPS, FITTING 1300132 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1142 05/16/00 $450.52 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. CABLE TIES, TY -RAP, C 1300133 STREET NAME SI GENERAL SUPPLI 1141 05/16/00 $177.86 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. WOOD SCREWS 1302228 GENERAL MAINT TOOLS 1250 05/16/00 $126.97 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. NYLON ROPE 1302229 PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPLI 1249 05/16/00 $458.30 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. FLAT WASHERS, O -RING, 1303026 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 1248 < *> $1,658.57* 210447 05/16/00 $19.18 LEEF SERVICES TOWELS 228951 MAINT OF COURS LAUNDRY < *> $19.18* 210448 05/16/00 $380.22 LEITNER COMPANY SOIL MIX 167501 CENTENNIAL LAK FERTILIZER 2085 05/16/00 $431.34 LEITNER COMPANY SOIL MIX 167567 CENTENNIAL LAK FERTILIZER 2085 < *> $811.56* 210449 05/16/00 $110.58 LESCO SERVICE CENTER 3 GAL. SPRAYER 1P87G2 MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPLI 6436 < *> $110.58* 210450 05/16/00 $166.75 LOFFLER BUSINESS SYSTEMS TYPEWRITTER CART 31776A POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI 3191. 05/16/00 $71.23 LOFFLER BUSINESS SYSTEMS TYPEWRITTER CART 25649B POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI 3041 < *> $237.98* 210451 05/16/00 $100.00 LOWEY, DICK PIANIST FOR VOLUNTEER 042600 CONTINGENCIES GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $100.00* 210452 05/16/00 $22..98 MAC PROFESSIONAL'S BOOK BOOK CLUB 030800 MEDIA LAB DUES & SUBSCRI 9028 < *> $22.98* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 10 -MAY -2000 (13:31) .page 18 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT MARKS, KEN VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM - OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 210453 05/16/00 $365.85 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. DIRT SHOE RUNNERS 2003454 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1160 < *> MARTIN, KIM $365.85* 042500 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $35.00* 210454 05/16/00 - $57.84 MAGNUSON SOD /HAAG SERVIC Credit Balance 11200 -E FIELD MAINTENA SOD & DIRT 1145 POLICE DEPT. G 05/16/00 $292.34 MAGNUSON SOD /HAAG SERVIC SOD 58155 MAINT OF COURS SOD & DIRT 6566 210462 05/16/00 $48.16 MAGNUSON SOD /HAAG SERVIC MASON SAND 14461 STREET RENOVAT GENERAL SUPPLI 1329 $332.07* 05/16/00 -$2.00 MAGNUSON SOD /HAAG SERVIC ADJUSTMENT ADJ FIELD MAINTENA SOD & DIRT MATRIX COMMUNICATIONS < *> 0041691- $280.66* TELEPHONE 05/16/00 $52.50 MATRIX COMMUNICATIONS IN.PARK & REC SERVICE 0041695- 210455 05/16/00 $16.00 MAMA MAMA LUNCHEON 1509 ADMINISTRATION MEETING EXPENS < *> $16.00* 210458 05/16/00 05/16/00 05/16/00 05/16/00 05/16/00 05/16/00 05/16/00 05/16/00 05/16/00 05/16/00 05/16/00 05/16/00 05/16/00 05/16/00 05/16/00 05/16/00 05/16/00 05/16/00 05/16/00 05/16/00 05/16/00 05/16/00 05/16/00 05/16/00 05/16/00 05/16/00 05/16/00 $1,059.70 $3,774.90 $55.95 $42.50 $75.00 $254.00 $1,109.75 $55.95 $2,212.57 $15.20 $52.00 $187.40 $1,270.03 $15.20 $35.00 $2,230.00 $3,669.60 $74.00 $170.00 $264.00 $785.00 $15.20 $2,559.00 $2,075.55 $68.10 $70.00 $54.00 $22,249.60* MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 139846 COST OF GOODS SOLD'BE 139864 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 139865 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 139866 BEER 141761 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 142452 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 142507 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 142508 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 142509 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 142510 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 142511 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 142745 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 142746 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 142747 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 142748 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 142853 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 142876 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 142877 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 142878 BEER 144670 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 145152 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 145153 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 145310 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 145320 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 145321 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 145322 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 145323 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX YORK.SELLING CST OF GDS MIX FRED RICHARDS CST OF GDS BEE 6337 GRILL CST OF GDS BEE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE GRILL CST OF GDS BEE 6337 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 210459 05/16/00 $28.00 MARKS, KEN PARTS BOX /PAD LOCK /ST 042800 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $28.00* 210460 05/16/00 $35.00 MARTIN, KIM KIDS ART 5 -25 -00 042500 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $35.00* 210461 05/16/00 $304.50 MARTIN - MCALLISTER PERSONNEL EVALUATION 1145 POLICE DEPT. G PROF SERVICES 3028 < *> $304.50* 210462 05/16/00 $332.07 MATHISON CO. PALETTE WOOD 407073 -0 ART SUPPLY GIF COST OF GD SOL 9021 < *> $332.07* 210463 05/16/00 $145.00 MATRIX COMMUNICATIONS IN FIRE PHONE SERVICE 0041691- CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE 05/16/00 $52.50 MATRIX COMMUNICATIONS IN.PARK & REC SERVICE 0041695- CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE COUNCIL CHECK .__jISTER 10- MAY -2000 (1_ ) page 19 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------_--------------------------- 210463 05/16/00 $328.13 MATRIX COMMUNICATIONS IN SERVICE 0041858- CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE 05/16/00 $286.00 MATRIX COMMUNICATIONS IN NEW PHONE 0041858- INSPECTIONS GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $811.63* 210464 05/16/00 $100.00 MATTESON, RUTH ANGEL.THE CLOWN 5 -16- 042500 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $100.00* 210465 05/16/00 $2,395.98 MAXFLI GOLF DIVISION BUCKETS 2174482 RANGE RANGE BALLS 6455 05/16/00 $16,239.42 MAXFLI GOLF DIVISION RANGE BALLS 2177467 RANGE RANGE BALLS 6455 < *> $18,635.40* 210466 05/16/00 $300.00 MAXIMUM SOLUTIONS INC UPGRADE & MAINT. 043000 ARENA ADMINIST DUES & SUBSCRI 8014 < *> $300.00* 210467 05/16/00 $885.43 MCCAREN DESIGNS INC. FLOWERS, PLANTS 12747 POOL TRACK GRE TREES FLWR SHR 2230 05/16/00 $700.12 MCCAREN DESIGNS INC. FLOWERS 12766 POOL TRACK GRE TREES FLWR SHR 2250 < *> $1,585..55* 210468 05/16/00 $338.,57 MDS MATRX MEDICAL INC AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 698895 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 3816 05/16/00 $182.76 MDS MATRX MEDICAL INC AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 699220 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 3816 <*> $521.33* 210469 05/16/00 $339.68 MEDTRONIC PHYSIO CONTROL LP10 -C SERVICE CONTRA IV586482 FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP MAINT 3799 < *> $339.68* 210470 05/16/00 - $43.62 MENARDS ACCT #35170288 CREDIT 32786 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI 05/16/00 $250.45 MENARDS ACCT #35170288 PUMP & PLUMBING PARTS 33410 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI 2077 05/16/00 $102.65 MENARDS ACCT #35170288_ TAPE, GLOVES, BATTERI 33648. POOL TRACK GRE GENERAL SUPPLI 2246 < *> $309.48* 210471 05/16/00 $53.68 MENARDS * ACCT #30240251 WOOD 84090 GOLF ADMINISTR GENERAL SUPPLI 6019 05/16/00 $41.71 MENARDS * ACCT #30240251 GLUE, TAPE 84481 GOLF ADMINISTR GENERAL'SUPPLI 6021 05/16/00 $89.90 MENARDS * ACCT #30240251 BUCKETS, ADAPTERS 85662 RANGE GENERAL SUPPLI 6028 05/16/00 $21.29 MENARDS * ACCT #30240251 COOLER 85938 GRILL GENERAL SUPPLI 6033 < *> $206.58* 210472 05/16/00 $306.19 MERIT SUPPLY SQUEEGEE, LPSI & II 53496 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 1150 05/16/00 $903.60 MERIT SUPPLY 101 CLEANER, SPA BATH 53498 POOL TRACK GRE CLEANING SUPPL 2241 05/16/00 $311.19 MERIT SUPPLY SILICONE SEALANT 53543 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 1161 05/16/00 $473.87 MERIT SUPPLY ROLL TOWELS, HOSES. 53545 POOL TRACK GRE GENERAL SUPPLI 2245 05/16/00 $235.90 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 53590 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 1196 05/16/00 $131.00 MERIT SUPPLY DEGREASER, WINDOW CLE 53598 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1342 05/16/00 $932.09 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 53600 ARENA BLDG /GRO CLEANING SUPPL 8006 05/16/00 $657.21 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 53615 POOL TRACK GRE CLEANING SUPPL 2252 < *> $3,951.05* 210473 05/16/00 $161.67 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY SOFTBALLS 42563 EDINA ATHLETIC GENERAL SUPPLI 05/16/00 $359.60 METRO ATHLETIC "SUPPLY BALLFIELD SUPPLIES 42775 FIELD MAINTENA GENERAL SUPPLI 1267 05/16/00 $127.64 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY FIELD MARKING PAINT 42803 FIELD MAINTENA LINE MARK POWD 1193 < *> $648.91* 210474 05/16/00 $1,039.50 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL SAC FOR APRIL 2000 050300 GENERAL FD PRO SAC CHARGES < *> $1,039.50* 210475 05/16/00 $483.91 MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPLY TOWELS, PLATES, LINER 18615 CITY HALL GENE PAPER SUPPLIES 4724 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 10 -MAY -2000 (13:31) page 20 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <*> $483.91* 210477 05/16/00 $289.05 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI COST OF GOODS SOLD 66437197 CENTENNIAL LAK COST OF GD SOL 05/16/00 $92.40 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI COST OF GOODS SOLD 18908599 FRED RICHARDS COST OF GD SOL 6327 05/16/00 $192.48 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 62405090 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 05/16/00 $66.50 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI COKE 67023079 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6327 05/16/00 $487.30 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI COKE 67023087 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6327 05/16/00 $226.61 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 63928232 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 05/16/00 $37.25 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI COST OF GOODS SOLD 66442155 FRED RICHARDS COST OF GD SOL 6327 05/16/00 - $36.15 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI COST OF GOODS SOLD 66442163 FRED RICHARDS COST OF GD SOL 6327 05/16/00 $214.80 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI COST OF GOODS SOLD 67028128 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6327 05/16/00 $95.00 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI COST OF GOODS SOLD 67028144 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6327 05/16/00 $12.00 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI COST OF GOODS SOLD 67028169 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6327 05/16/00 $55.25 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI COST OF GOODS SOLD 19018703 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 05/16/00 $108.00 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI COST OF GOODS SOLD 65830106 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 05/16/00 $299.00 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI COST OF GOODS SOLD 65830114 GRILL COST OF GD SOL < *> $2,139.49* 210478 05/16/00 $138.74 MIDWEST VENDING INC CANDY 2034 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6338 < *> $138.74* 210479 05/16/00 $1,224.00 MILLER & SCHROEDER ASSET MANAGEMENT FEE 042000 GENERAL FD PRO DUE FROM HRA < *> $1,224.0.0* 210480 05/16/00 $78.20 MILWAUKEE ELECTRIC TOOL REPAIR TO DRILL 1038192 POOL TRACK GRE CONTR REPAIRS 2242 < *> $78.20* 210481 05/16/00 $750.00 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN S REPAIR STOP BOX 31753 DISTRIBUTION CONTR REPAIRS 1026 < *> $750.00* 210482 05/16/00 $32.00 MINNESOTA STATE BOARD OF ELECTRICAL PERMIT 042500 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $32.00* 210483 05/16/00 $4,981.68 MINNESOTA STATE TREASURE SUR CHARGE FOR APRIL 050300 GENERAL FD PRO SURTAX < *> $4,981.68* 210484 05/16/00 $33.47 MINNESOTA WANNER BRASS TIP, STRAINER 0044096- FIELD MAINTENA REPAIR PARTS 5910 < *> $33.47* 210485 05/16/00 $280.00 MINNESOTA WOMENS PRESS I HELP WANTED ADS 00028286 CENT SVC GENER ADVERT PERSONL < *> $280.00* 210486 05/16/00 $74.73 MINNESOTA'S BOOKSTORE BINDERS FOR CODE BOOK 050500 POLICE DEPT. G BOOKS & PAMPHL < *> $74.73* 210487 05/16/00 $79.13 MITCHELL /REPAIR INFORMAT WINDOWS RENEWAL PAYME 5740072 EQUIPMENT OPER DATA PROCESSIN 5877 < *> $79.13* 210488 05/16/00 $70.00 MN FIRE SERVICE CERTIFIC INSPECTOR CERTIFICATI 050400 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $70.00* 210489 05/16/00 $140.00 MODERN -TECH INC. CHECKED NOVAR SYSTEM 2147 POOL TRACK GRE CONTR REPAIRS 2255 < *> $140.00* 210490 05/16/00 $331.50 MDSE, WILLIAM SOFTBALL OFFICIAL 050200 EDINA ATHLETIC PROF SERVICES 10 -MAY -2000 (1'- ) page 21 COUNCIL CHECK .__.SISTER CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM--- - - - - -- OBJECT-- - - - -PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <*> $331.50* 210491 05/16/00 $380.00 MPLS COMMUNITY & TECHNIC CONT. ED. 00 -093 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $380.00* 210492 05/16/00 $315.00 MSA FORESTRY TRAINING 042500 TREES & MAINTE CONF & SCHOOLS 5702 < *> $315.00* 210493 05/16/00 $25.00 MSANI CONTINUING ED- CAN AM 041400 POLICE DEPT. G CONF_& SCHOOLS < *> $25.00* 210494 05/16/00 $182.80 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. TIRE PNUEMATIC 10540 -00 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR -PARTS 1289 05/16/00 $125.14 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. IRRIGATION PARTS 10701 -00 FIELD MAINTENA REPAIR PARTS 1184 05/16/00 $13.30 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. HOSE 10253 -00 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI 2084, 05/16/00 $109.84 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. ANTI SCALP, SEAL 12135 =00 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1304 05/16/00 $63.20 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. IRRIGATION REPAIR 11212 -00 MAINT OF LOURS IRRIGATION EQU 6429 05/16/00 $427.78 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. IRRIGATION PARTS 12669 -00 MAINT OF COURS IRRIGATION EQU 6428 05/16/00 $21.66 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. IRRIGATION PARTS 12689 -01 MAINT OF COURS IRRIGATION EQU 6428 05/16/00 $80.62 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. IRRIGATION PARTS 13094 -00 RICHARDS MAINT IRRIGATION EQU 6594 05/16/00 $298.08 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. REPAIR PARTS 13473 -00 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 6434 05/16/00 $531.65 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. IRRIGATION PARTS 13722 -00 MAINT OF LOURS IRRIGATION EQU 6438 05/16/00 - $427.78 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. IRRIGATION PARTS 13727 -00 MAINT OF COURS IRRIGATION EQU 6428 < *> $1,426.29* 210495 05/16/00 $146.12 MUNICILITE CO STROBE BULB ASSEMBLY 455 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1116 < *> $146.12* 210496 05/16/00 $496.90 NAPA AUTO PARTS PARTS 043000 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS < *> $496.90* 210497 05/16/00 $250.00 NATIONAL AUTOMATIC SPRIN SPRINKLER MAINTENANCE 0006702- CLUB HOUSE SVC CONTR EQUI 6497 < *> $250.00* 210498 05/16/00 $780.00 NATIONAL FREIGHT SERVICE GARBAGE BAGS 3279 LITTER REMOVAL GENERAL SUPPLI 1174 < *> $780.00* 210499 05/16%00 $115.00 NATIONAL TRUST FORUM NATIONAL TRUST MEMBER R9P160 PLANNING DUES & SUBSCRI < *> $115.00* 210500 05/16/00 $23.90 NELSON, DAVID OFFICE SUPPLIES 042800 POLICE DEPT. G OFFICE SUPPLIE < *> $23.90* 210501 05/16/00 $249.00 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 10022 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $249.00* 210502 05/16/00 $103.80 NORTH STAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 27011508 YORK SELLING CST OF .GDS MIX 05/16/00 $84.00 NORTH STAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 13012402 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 05/16/00 $210.00 NORTH STAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 31012515 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 05/16/00 $52.50 NORTH STAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 12012602 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX < *> $450.30* 210503 05/16/00 $40.22 NORTH STAR TURF SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 223773 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 6593 < *> $40.22* 210504 05/16/00 $164.00 NORTHERN BALANCE & SCALE CLEAN & CALIBRATE SCA 00024893 LABORATORY CONTR SERVICES 1266 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 10 -MAY -2000 (13:31) page 22 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ < *> $164.00* 210505 05/16/00 $74.44 NORTHLAND CHEMICAL CORP HIGHLIGHT CLEANER 045763 PW BUILDING CLEANING SUPPL 1268 05/16/00 $179.18 NORTHLAND CHEMICAL CORP SWAT INSECTICIDE, POL 045764 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 1269 < *> $253.62* 210506 05/16/00 $306.39 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY CANVAS PANELS 17378900 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES 9018 05/16/00 $89.55 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY LTX TUBES 17393000 ART SUPPLY GIF COST OF GD SOL.9022 < *> $395.94* 210507 05/16/00 $282.12 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES NW -62436 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES 5988 05/16/00 $150.36 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO RECAP DRIVE TRAC, DIS NW -62536 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES 5988 05/16/00 $256.24 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES, DISPOSAL FEE NW -62590 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES 5988 05/16/00 $92.34 NORTHWESTERN.TIRE CO TIRES NW -62706 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES 5988 < *> $781.06* 210508 05/16/00 $100.00 KEPRIOS, JOHN PERFORMANCE 6 -5 -2000 050800 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $100.00* 210509 05/16/00 $81.12 NOVAK'S GARAGE REPAIRS T_0 PLATES 15026 CENTENNIAL LAK CONTR REPAIRS 2065 < *> $81.12* 210510 05/16/00 $37.00 NUEBERGER, ELIZABETH TENNIS LESSON REFUND 050400 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F < *> $37.00* 210511 05/16/00 $450.00 OAK RIDGE COUNTRY CLUB 6 DRIVING RANGE GOLF 042700 RANGE RANGE BALLS < *> $450.00* 210512 05/16/00 $171.47 OFFICE DEPOT PAPER, PENS, BINDERS 042600 GOLF ADMINISTR OFFICE SUPPLIE 6006 < *> $171.47* 210513 05/16/00 $100.16 OGIO INTERNATIONAL INC. GOLF BAG 353752 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6486 05/16/00 $81.16 OGIO INTERNATIONAL INC. BAGS 354093 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6486 < *> $181.32* 210514 05/16/00 $35.08 OLSEN CHAIN & CABLE CO I SUPPLIES 17562 MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPLI 6432 < *> $35.08* 210515 05/16/00 $83.00 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC COOKIES 90924502 -GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6339 < *> $83.00* 210516 05/16/00 $97.35 OWENS SERVICES CORP. RESET OIL SAFETY ON P 39591 POOL TRACK GRE CONTR REPAIRS 2238 < *> $97.35* 210517 05/16/00 $2,713.66 PARTS PLUS PARTS 042600 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS < *> $2,713.66* 210518 05/16/00 $100.00 PATTIWORKS INC MAY CALENDAR LAYOUT 1146 ED ADMINISTRAT PROF SERVICES < *> $100.00* 210519 05/16/00 $211.36 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 43807393 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 05/16/00 $172.48 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 45341566 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $383.84* 210522 05/16/00 -$7.99 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 3213795 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE COUNCIL CHECK _ SISTER 10 -MAY -2000 (1''- ) page 23 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 210522 05/16/00 - $11.00 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 3213796 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 - $11.72 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 3213797 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 - $24.69 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 3213934 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 - $78.38 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 3213935 YORK SELLING. CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 - $17.19 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 3213936 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 -$5.61 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 3213993 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 - $11.02 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 3213994 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 -$3.53 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 3213995 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 - $13.75 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 3213996 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 -$8.01 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 3213997 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 -$3.12 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 3213998 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/16/00 -$2.33 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 3213999 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/16/00 -$1.83 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 3214000 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/16/00 -$5.61 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 3214001 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 $50.19 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 601926 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 05/16/00 $1,945.79 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS .COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 601927 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 $24.98 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 601928 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 05/16/00 $970.87 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 601929 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 $980.26 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 601930 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/16/00 $2,552.88 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 601931 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 $311.40 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 601932 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/16/00 $1,915.95 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 601933 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 $94.38 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI .601934 VERNON SELLING CST OF.GD WINE 05/16/00 $34.89 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 603532 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 05/16/00 $12,142.22 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 603533 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/16/00 $789.08 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 603534 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 $1,658.81 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 604190 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 $76.14 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 604191 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 05/16/00 $1,708.94 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 604192. 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 $287.40 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 604193 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 05/16/00 $469.84 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 604194 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/16/00 $1,027.38 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 604195 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 $399.09 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 604196 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LI,QU 05/16/00 $1,510.93 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 604197 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 $830.95 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 604713 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $29,576.59* 210523 05/16/00 $37.00 PHILLIPS, KRISTI TENNIS LESSON REFUND 042600 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F < *> $37.00* 210524 05/16/00 $305.00 PHOENIX SAFETY MANAGEMEN SAFETY VIDEO 4178P GENERAL MAINT SAFETY EQUIPME 1282 < *> $305.00* 210525 05/16/00 $65.50 PING GOLF CLUBS 4437087 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6307 < *> $65.50* 210526 05/16/00 $72.51 PINKERTON SYSTEMS INTEGR FIX PHONE COVER ON IN 00156.89- POOL TRACK GRE CONTR REPAIRS 2251 < *> $72.51* 210527 05/16/00 $559.20 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 29959 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 05/16/00 $279.60 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 30010 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 05/16/00 $1,259.96 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 30040 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 05/16/00 $270.75 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 30048 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 05/16/00 $70.05 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 30049 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 05/16/00 $23.40 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 30056 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 10 -MAY -2000 (13:31) page 24 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 210527 05/16/00 $587.16 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 30192 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 05/16/00 $255.25 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 30259 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $3,305.37* 210528 05/16/00 $101.70 PIONEER RIM & WHEEL CO. AXEL 1- 238395 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1105 < *> $101.70* 210529 05/16/00 $17.63 POKORNY COMPANY REPAIR PARTS 18165 CLUB HOUSE REPAIR-PARTS 6582 < *> $17.63* 210530 05/16/00 $115.00 POLICE OFFICERS FEDERATI AD CA 5239 GOLF DOME ADVERT OTHER < *> $115.00* 210531 05/16/00 $87.23 POLO RALPH LAUREN CORPOR CLOTHING 937189 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6202 < *> $87.23* 210532 05/16/00 $47.28 POLO RALPH LAUREN WW GOL CLOTHING 073 -0504 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6201 < *> $47.28* 210533 05/16/00 $71.15 POMMER CO RECOGNITION 47155 CONTINGENCIES GENERAL SUPPLI 4738 05/16/00 $45.51 POMMER CO RECOGNITION 47155 HUMAN RELATION EDUCATION PRGM < *> $116.66* 210534 05/16/00 $85.17 PORTHAN, TODD TACKLE 042800. POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $85.17* 210535 05/16/00 $99.00 POSTMASTER BULK MAIL 050800 CENT SVC GENER POSTAGE < *> $99.00* 210536 05/16/00 $149.10 PRECISION TURF & CHEMICA SUPPLIES 15587 MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPLI 6591 < *> $149.10* 210537 05/16/00 $476.17 PRINT SHOP, THE MONTHLY NEWSLETTER 10847 SENIOR CITIZEN GENERAL SUPPLI 4725 < *> $476.17* 210538 05/16/00 - $39.01 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 535568 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 $1,603.38 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 207534 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 $297.34 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 207538 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 $1,114.00 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 207545 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 $140.70 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI.207961 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE - 05/16/00 $195.80 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 210880 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 $786.10 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 210882 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 $53.30 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 210883 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 $272.08 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 210885 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 $176.00 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 210886 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 $470.78 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 210889 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $5,070.47* 21053.9 05/16/00 $1,329.12 PROGRESSIVE CONSULTING E WATER TREATMENT PLANT 00017.02 UTILITY PROG CIP 05/16/00 $5,271.24 PROGRESSIVE CONSULTING E WATER TREATMENT PLANT 99022.12 UTILITY PROG CIP < *> $6,600.36* 210540 05/16/00 $111.00 PROTECTION ONE ALARM SERVICE 5/10 ARENA BLDG /GRO ALARM SERVICE 8008 < *> $111.00* COUNCIL CHECK i—ISTER 10 -MAY -2000 (13 page 25 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 210541 05/16/00 $209.81 QUALIFICATION TARGETS TARGETS 20000254 POLICE DEPT. G AMMUNITION 3023 < *> $209.81* 210543 05/16/00 $458.05 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 831561 -0 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 -$4.53 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 831561 -0 50TH ST SELLIN TRADE DISCOUNT 05/16/00 $1,888.63 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 831562 -0 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 - $18.67 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 831562 -0 YORK SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT 05/16/00 $5,067.83 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 831563 -0 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 - $50.10 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 831563 -0 VERNON SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT 05/16/00 $1,744.76 QUALITY WIN E COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 831723 -0 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 05/16/00 - $34.67 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 831723 -0 50TH ST SELLIN TRADE DISCOUNT 05/16/00 $3,203.82 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 831724 -0 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/16/00 - $63.63 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 831724 -0 YORK SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT 05/16/00 $2,288.00 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 831725 -0 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/16/00 - $45.35 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 831725 -0 VERNON.SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT 05/16/00 $383.40 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 831812 -0 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 -$3.80 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 831812 -0 50TH ST SELLIN TRADE DISCOUNT 05/16/00 $411.05 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 832798 -0 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/16100 -$4.06 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 832798 -0 YORK SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT < *> $15,220.73* 210544 05/16/00 $52.28 R.& R PRODUCTS INC. REPAIR PARTS 00000422 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 6596 < *> $52.28* 210545 05/16/00 $688.31 R &R SPECIALTIES INC REPAIR RESURFACER 00012561 ARENA ICE MAIN CONTR REPAIRS 8092 < *> $688.31* 210546 05/16/00 $238.46 RADIO SHACK SIREN /ALARM 054352 GOLF DOME SAFETY EQUIPME 6569 05/16/00 $79.39 RADIO SHACK SIREN, INFRARED MOT S 054354 GOLF DOME SAFETY EQUIPME 6569 < *> $317.85* 210547 05/16/00 $177.47 RALPH LAUREN FOOTWEAR CO SHOES 510003OR PRO_SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6201 < *> $177.47* 210548 05/16/00 $6,212.00 RAYMOND HAEG PLUMBING COMPLETE PLUMBING WOR 0414 STM PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 5469 < *> $6,212.00* 210549 05/16/00 $40.26 RDO TRUCK CENTER HEX BOLT 22011001 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5805 210550 05/16/00 $92.56 RED ROOSTER AUTO STORES REPAIR PARTS 4/30 STA RICHARDS MAINT REPAIR PARTS 6532 05/16/00 $116.81 RED ROOSTER AUTO STORES .REPAIR PARTS 4/30 STA MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 6532 < *> $209.37* 210551 05/16/00 $559.13 REDWOOD SIGNS SIGN REPAIR 8834 MAINT OF COURS CONTR REPAIRS 2410 05/16/00 $1,777.49 REDWOOD SIGNS PARK ID SIGN 8835 PARK MEMORIALS GENERAL SUPPLI 5700 < *> $2,336.62* 210552 05/16/00 $546.00 REIMER, MARK SOFTBALL UMPIRE 050200 EDINA ATHLETIC PROF SERVICES < *> $546.00* 210554 05/16/00 $774.17 RELIANT ENERGY - MINNEGA HEAT 042700 FIRE DEPT. GEN HEAT 05/16/00 $167.08 RELIANT ENERGY - MINNEGA HEAT 042700 YORK FIRE STAT HEAT 05/16/00 $736.19 RELIANT ENERGY - MINNEGA HEAT 042700 CITY HALL GENE HEAT 05/16/00 $5,703.19 RELIANT ENERGY - MINNEGA HEAT 042700 PW BUILDING HEAT COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 10 -MAY -2000 (13:31). page 26 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 210554 05/16/00 $2,107.60 RELIANT ENERGY - MINNEGA HEAT 042700 BUILDING MAINT HEAT 05/16/00 $415.87 RELIANT ENERGY - MINNEGA HEAT 042700 ART CENTER BLD HEAT 05/16/00 $37.28 RELIANT ENERGY - MINNEGA HEAT 042700 POOL OPERATION HEAT 05/16/00 $541.23 RELIANT ENERGY - MINNEGA HEAT 042700 CLUB HOUSE HEAT 05/16/00 $166.35 RELIANT ENERGY - MINNEGA HEAT 042700 MAINT OF LOURS HEAT 05/16/00 $2,633.64 RELIANT ENERGY - MINNEGA HEAT 042700 GOLF DOME HEAT 05/16/00 $43.53 RELIANT ENERGY - MINNEGA HEAT 042700 FRED RICHARDS HEAT 05/16/00 $4,295.88 RELIANT ENERGY - MINNEGA HEAT 042700 ARENA BLDG /GRO HEAT 05/16/00 $3,386.46 RELIANT ENERGY - MINNEGA HEAT 042700 POOL TRACK GRE HEAT 05/16/00 $488.85 RELIANT ENERGY - MINNEGA HEAT 042700 CENTENNIAL LAK HEAT 05/16/00 $618.19 RELIANT ENERGY - MINNEGA HEAT 042700 PUMP & LIFT ST HEAT 05/16/00 $2,022.05 RELIANT ENERGY - MINNEGA HEAT 042700 DISTRIBUTION HEAT 05/16/00 $16.16 RELIANT ENERGY - MINNEGA HEAT 042700 50TH ST OCCUPA HEAT 05/16/00 $49.92 RELIANT ENERGY - MINNEGA HEAT 042700 YORK OCCUPANCY HEAT 05/16/00 $83.31 RELIANT ENERGY - MINNEGA HEAT 042700 VERNON OCCUPAN HEAT < *> $24,286.95* 210555 05/16/00 $1,549.59 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPA INSTALL MOP.SINK, FAU 19822 LIQUOR 50TH ST BUILDINGS 4696 < *> $1,549.59* 210556 05/16/00 $33.00 RISK MANAGEMENT ALTERNAT APRIL LETTERS 55187701 GENERAL FD PRO AMBULANCE FEES < *> -. $33.00* 210557 05/16/00 $50.00 ROBBINSDALE CITY BAND CONCERT 5 -18 -00 042500 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $50.00* 210558 05/16/00 $49.52 ROBERT B. HILL SALT - MARCH 00096200 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 3704 05/16/00 $479.25 ROBERT B. HILL GENERAL SUPPLIES. 00097614 ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPLI 8001 < *> $528.77* 210559 05/16/00 $670.95 ROC INC. CLEANING 2200 GRILL SVC CONTR EQUI 6034 05/16/00 $511.12 ROC INC. CLEANING 2201 GRILL SVC CONTR EQUI 6034 <*> $1,182.07* 210560 05/16/00 $53.04 ROCHESTER MIDLAND SANITATION 00267056 FRED RICHARDS CLEANING SUPPL 6341 < *> $53.04* 210561 05/16/00 $137.50 ROOT- O -MATIC SEWER SERVI DRAIN REPAIR 12083 BUILDING MAINT CONTR REPAIRS 1168 < *> $137.50* 210562 05/16/00 $25.00 ROTHBERG, FAITH PARTIAL REFUND 050800 POOL ADMIN SEASON TICKETS < *> $25.00* 210563 05/16/00 $281.29 RUUD, RALPH AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 042800 GENERAL FD PRO AMBULANCE FEES < *> $281.29* 210564 05/16/00 $117.00 RYDER, ROBERT SOFTBALL UMPIRE 050200 EDINA ATHLETIC PROF SERVICES < *> $117.00* 210565 05/16/00 $41.70 SAINT AGNES BAKING COMPA BAKERY 043540 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6349 05/16/00 $46.92 SAINT AGNES BAKING COMPA BAKERY 043608 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6349 05/16/00 $25.86 SAINT AGNES BAKING COMPA BAKERY 043728 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6349 05/16/00 $80.45 SAINT AGNES BAKING COMPA BAKERY 043770 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6349 05/16/00 $54.06 SAINT AGNES BAKING COMPA BAKERY 043877 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6349 05/16/00 $42.99 SAINT AGNES BAKING COMPA BAKERY 043929 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6349 10 -MAY -2000 (1-- 1 page 27 COUNCIL CHECK t.LjISTER CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM--- - - - - -- OBJECT-- - - - -PO -NUM ----------------------------=--------------------------------------------- < *> $291.98* - 210566 05/16/00 $60.51 SCHAFER EQUIP CO. DERBY, RUBBER BOOTS 198140 GENERAL MAINT TOOLS 1057 < *> $60.51* 210567 05/16/00 $30.00 SCHULTZ, DWIGHT REFUND ON ROAD PERMIT 042400 GENERAL FD PRO ROAD REST. PER < *> $30.00* 210568 05/16/00 $405.00 SCHWARTZ, S.A. CLOTHING FOR UNIFORMS 042800 POLICE DEPT. G UNIF ALLOW < *> $405.00* 210569 05/16/00 $120.00- SEVERUD, KEN GOLF LESSONS 050500 GOLF ADMINISTR PRO SVC - GOLF < *> $120.00* 210570 05/16/00 $367.20 SGN ARCHITECT FEES 1638 PKBOND CIP PROF SERVICES CONTRACT < *> $367.20* 210571 05/16/00 $400.00 SHANNON, JIM JUNE PIANO 050800 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $400.00* 210572 05/16/00 $135.14 SHERWIN WILLIAMS PAINT AND SUNDRIES 7137 -2 BRIDGES GUARD GENERAL SUPPLI 1245 < *> $135.14* 210573 05/16/00 $10.96 SHIRLEY, TOM ART SUPPLIES 05.0800 ED ADMINISTRAT GENERAL SUPPLI 05/16/00 $90.20 SHIRLEY, TOM GENERAL SUPPLIES 050800 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $101.16* 210574 05/16/00 $36..14 SHORT, MICHAEL MICROSOFT SERVICE PAC 042800 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $36.14* 210575 05/16/00 $75.00 SHUTTERS 'N SHADES SHUTTERS MAINTENANCE 45 RANGE CONTR REPAIRS 6018 05/16/00 $319.48 SHUTTERS 'N SHADES SHUTTER REPAIR 46 FRED RICHARDS CONTR REPAIRS 6037 <*> $394.48* 210576 05/16/00 $401.92 SIITARI, MICHAEL CONTINUING.ED (CHIEF' 042700 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $401.92* 210577 05/16/00 $75.00 SIMONSON, SIA DOME BUCKET CARD REFU 042100 GOLF DOME GOLF DOME RECP -c*> $75.00* 210578 05/16/00 $88.08 SMITH, AMY MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 050800 GOLF ADMINISTR MILEAGE < *> $88.08* 210579 05/16/00 $350.65 SNAP -ON INDUSTRIAL UPDATE KIT 21V/1162 EQUIPMENT OPER TOOLS 1086 < *> $350.65* 210580 05/16/00 $125.00 SOCCER INVITATIONAL PROG AD 006533 GOLF DOME ADVERT OTHER < *> $125.00* . 210581 05/16/00 $1,291.20 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST-OF GOODS SOLD BE 106191 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 05/16/00 $43.70 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I.COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 106192 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX' 05/16/00 $3,263.80 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 106195 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 05/16/00 $73.20 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 106287 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 05/16/00 $75.00 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I BEER 317951 FRED RICHARDS CST OF GDS BEE 6342 05/16/00 $1,458.37 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF.GOODS SOLD BE 106414 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 10 -MAY -2000 (13:31) page 28 CHECK NO ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 210581 05/16/00 $24.40 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 106416 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 05/16/00 $4,864.58 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 106417 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE < *> $11,094.25* 210582 05/16/00 $96.68 SPALDING HATS 52229382 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6217 < *> $96.68* 210583 05/16/00 $145.00 SPECIAL OPERATIONS TRAIN SOTA'S 5TH ANNUAL TRA 1978 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS 2860 05/16/00 $420.00 SPECIAL OPERATIONS TRAIN CONTINUING ED 1989 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS 2617 < *> $565.00* 210584 05/16/00 $371.79 SPS COMPANIES PRIMER, BALL VALVES 3470504 POOL TRACK GRE GENERAL SUPPLI 2231 05/16/00 $22.97 SPS COMPANIES PIPE 3475591 FIELD MAINTENA REPAIR PARTS 1181 05/16/00 - $59.40 . SPS COMPANIES CREDIT CM347721 ARENA BLDG /GRO CONTR REPAIRS 8094 05/16/00 $26.09 SPS COMPANIES TEFLON TAPE, BRUSH, S 3478973 BUILDING MAINT TOOLS 1191 05/16/00 $24.71 SPS COMPANIES SOCKET, BRUSH 3481171 WATER TREATMEN GENERAL SUPPLI 1284 < *> $386.16* 210585 05/16/00 $440.72 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO REPAIR /REPLACE SLACK SW29411 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5874 05/16/00 $53.12 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO PARTS & SHIPPING SI87913 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 1303 05/16/00 $344.17 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO GEAR PUMP SI87930 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 1305 05/16/00 $3.16 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO 0 -RING SI88050 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1309 < *> $841.17* 210586 05/16/00 $4,769.66 STAR TRIBUNE HELP WANTED ADS 043000 CENT SVC GENER ADVERT PERSONL < *> $4,769.66* 210587 05/16/00 $1,141.25 STEICHEN'S SPORTING GOOD ADULT SOFTBALL PROGRA 30156 EDINA ATHLETIC GENERAL SUPPLI 05/16/00 $418.46 STEICHEN'S SPORTING GOOD ADULT SOFTBALL PROGRA 30157 EDINA ATHLETIC GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $1,559.71* 210588 05/16/00 $9.59 STREICHERS AMMUNITON 158997.1 POLICE DEPT. G AMMUNITION 3187 05/16/00 $5,838.86 STREICHERS RIFLE RACKS 157370.2 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP REPLACEM 3165 05/16/00 $174.66 STREICHERS TRAINING AMMUNITION 159482.2 POLICE DEPT. G AMMUNITION 3190 05/16/00 $77..12 STREICHERS BINOCULARS 160148.1 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP REPLACEM 3193 05/16/00 $99.05 STREICHERS 12 GA TACTICAL 160965.1 POLICE DEPT. G AMMUNITION 3002 05/16/00 $52.98 STREICHERS BARRIER TAPE 161151.1 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI 3005 05/16/00 $54.96 STREICHERS LABOR ON SQUAD EQUIP 161315.1 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP MAINT 3021 05/16/00 $131.79 STREICHERS AMMUNITION 161405.1 POLICE DEPT. G AMMUNITION 3190 05/16/00 $183.48 STREICHERS LABOR EQUIP. INSTALL 161478.1 POLICE DEPT -. G EQUIP MAINT 3022 < *> $6,622.49* 210589 05/16/00 $1,703.24 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET FRONT DOOR REPAIR, RE CVCB3696 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 1085 05/16/00 $977.90 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR ROOF OF CITY V CVCB3703 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5873 05/16/00 $22.85 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET ACCEL. PEDAL, SPRING 114103 -1 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1297 05/16/00 $75.42 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET BRACES & BRACKETS 114549CV EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1302 05/16/00 $16.21 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET HANDLE 115549CV EQUI -PMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1311 < *> $2,795.62* 210590 05/16/00 $268.87 SUBURBAN PROPANE L.P. FUEL 041700 ARENA ICE MAIN GASOLINE 8005 < *> $268.87* 210591 05/16/00 $99.27 SUN MOUNTAIN SPORTS INC. BAGS 121651 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6203 < *> $99.27* I COUNCIL CHECK .ISTER 10 -MAY -2000 (1_ ) page 29 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 210592 05/16/00 $171.60 SUN NEWSPAPERS AD FOR BID 314637 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LE 05/16/00 $143.00 SUN NEWSPAPERS AD FOR BIDS 314639 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LE 05/16/00 $96.53 SUN NEWSPAPERS AD FOR BID 316339 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LE 05/16/00 $101.89 SUN NEWSPAPERS AD FOR PUBLIC HEARING 316340 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LE < *> $513.02* 210593 05/16/00 $175.02 SUNDE LAND SURVEYING INC EASEMENT PREPARATION 25771 STREET IMPROV. CIP < *> $175.02* 210594 05/16/00 $424.01 SUPERIOR COFFEE AND FOOD COFFEE 8145459- GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6343 < *> $424.01* 210595 05/16/00 $639.00 SUTPHEN CORPORATION HYDRAULIC CYLINDER CA 12101556 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1111 < *> $639.00* 210596 05/16/00 $66.03 TAPE COMPANY, THE TAPES 50764284 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI 3006 < *> $66.03* 210597 05/16/00 $220.58 TARGET CRAFT SUPPLIES 77633 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI 05/16/00 $350.38 TARGET CRAFT SUPPLIES 80438 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI 05/16/00 $75.55 TARGET BASKETBALLS & WHISTLE 050400 ADAPTIVE RECRE GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $646.51* 210598 05/16/00 $613.31 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO SHRINK TERMINALS, WIR 30894 -00 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 1151 05/16/00 $173.45 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO WIRE 32052 -00 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 1117 < *> $786.76* 210599 05/16/00 $539.37 TERRY ANN SALES CO WATER CUPS 2317 GOLF ADMINISTR GENERAL SUPPLI 6015 < *> $539.37* 210600 05/16/00 $50.00 THOMAS, SKIP. PARADE FEE REFUND 050300 SPECIAL ACTIVI PROF SERVICES < *> $50.00* 210601 05/16/00 $15,259.47 THOMSEN & NYBECK PROSECUTING 144958 LEGAL SERVICES PROF SERVICES < *> $15,259.47* 210602 05/16/00 $383.00 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP BEER 191289 GRILL CST OF GDS BEE 6345 05/16/00 $4,196.60 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 191345 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 05/16/00 $40.15 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 191346 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 05/16/00 $214.00 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 191734 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 05/16/00 $382.00 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP BEER 164261 GRILL CST OF GDS BEE 6345 05/16/00 $4,335.40 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 192011 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 05/16/00 $24.20 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 192012 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 05/16/00 $237.70 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP BEER 192230 GRILL CST OF GDS BEE 6345 05/16/00 $72.00 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 192129 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE < *> $9,885.05* 210603 05/16/00 $250.00 THYSSEN LAGERQUIST ELEVA ANNUAL SAFETY INSPECT 117808 ARENA ADMINIST SAFETY EQUIPME 8013 < *> $250.00* 210604 05/16/00 $189.98 Tigerdirect CAMERA MEMORY P1983924 FIRE DEPARTMEN EQUIP REPLACEM 4708 05/16/00 $48.98 Tigerdirect MOUSE P1999879 ELECTION GENERAL SUPPLI 4733 05/16/00 $63.99 Tigerdirect MOUSE - TRACK BALL P1999947 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 4728 < *> $302.95* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 10 -MAY -2000 (13:31) page 30 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 210605 05/16/00 $410.80 TITLEIST GLOVES 2935887 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR - - - - -- 6210 05/16/00 $4,027.36 TITLEIST GOLF BALLS 2937060 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6210 05/16/00 $149.12 TITLEIST GOLF BALLS 2956653 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6210 < *> $4,587.28* 210606 05/16/00 $197.25 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPL WELDING GASES 314067 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 1146 05/16/00 $52.65 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPL WELDING SUPPLIES 314930 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI 05/16/00 $30.25 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPL WELDING SUPPLIES 315282 MAINT OF LOURS TOOLS 6589 05/16/00 $81.90 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPL WELDING CYLINDERS 425602 PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPLI 5878 < *> $362.05* 210607 05/16/00 $561.31 TOMMY HILFIGER GOLF SHORTS 557417 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6205 05/16/00 $305.35 TOMMY HILFIGER GOLF SHORTS 557418 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6205 < *> $866.66* 210608 05/16/00 $1,300.00 TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS I MAINT. CONTRACT 9450 50TH ST OCCUPA PROF SERVICES 05/16/00 $1,950.00 TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS I MAINT. CONTRACT 9450 YORK OCCUPANCY PROF SERVICES 05/16/00 $1,625.00 TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS I MAINT. CONTRACT 9450 VERNON OCCUPAN PROF SERVICES < *> $4,875.00* 210609 05/16/00 $107.96 TOUR EDGE WEDGES 00001516 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6440 05/16/00 $46.75 TOUR EDGE WEDGE 00001521 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6440 < *> $154.71* 210610 05/16/00 $339.67 TRACY /TRIPP FUELS GAS 72087 MAINT OF COURS GASOLINE 6529 < *> $339.67* 210611 05/16/00 $18,770.80 TURF SUPPLY COMPANY FERTILIZER FOR BRAEMA 074412 MAINT OF COURS FERTILIZER 4654 05/16/00 $5,000.00 TURF SUPPLY COMPANY FERTILIZER FOR RICHAR 074412 RICHARDS MAINT FERTILIZER < *> $23,770.80* 210612 05/16/00 $985.13 TURTLE BAY BUILDING SERV MONTHLY CLEANING SERV 247 POOL TRACK GRE PROF SERVICES CONTRACT < *> $985.13* • 210613 05/16/00 $49.25 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO OXYGEN 539921 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 3700 05/16/00 $33.60. TWIN CITY.OXYGEN CO OXYGEN - APRIL.. 541620 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 3700 < *> $82.85* 210614 05/16/00 $559.13 TWIN CITY SEED CO. SEED 2572 MAINT OF COURS PLANT & TREES 6592 05/16/00 $229.24 TWIN CITY SEED CO. FERTILIZER 2589 FIELD MAINTENA FERTILIZER 1186 < *> $788.37* 210615 05/16/00 $141.00 UHL CO. QUARTERLY SERVICE CON 103647 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 1338 < *> $141.00* 210616 05/16/00 $2,761.20 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORM ALLOWANCE MARCH 20 POLICE DEPT. G UNIF ALLOW 05/16/00 $562.34 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED GENERAL SUPPLIES MARCH 20 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI 05/16/00 $30.49 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORM ALLOWANCE MARCH 20 RESERVE PROGRA UNIF ALLOW < *> $3,354.03* 210617 05/16/00 $284.45 UNITED ELECTRIC COMPANY CIRCUIT BREAKER, SWIT 54218500 PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPLI 1344. < *> $284.45* 210618 05/16/00 $218.55 US FOODSERVICE INC FOOD 686155 CENTENNIAL LAK COST OF GD SOL 2083 05/16/00 $552.26 US FOODSERVICE INC FOOD 050100 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6346 COUNCIL CHECK — jISTER 10 -MAY -2000 (1- ) page 31 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 210618 05/16/00 $194.17 US FOODSERVICE INC PAPER, ASH TRAYS 050100 GRILL GENERAL SUPPLI 05/16/00 $114.88 US FOODSERVICE INC HAND SOAP & DISH SOAP 050100 GRILL CLEANING SUPPL < *> $1,079.86* 210619 05/16/00 $72.25 USGA FLAG, HANDICAP BOOK A137 -659 GOLF ADMINISTR GENERAL SUPPLI 6029 < *> $72.25* 210620 05/16/00 $441.18 VAN PAPER CO. BAGS 314583 YORK SELLING PAPER SUPPLIES 7512 05/16/00 $256.13 VAN PAPER CO. BAGS 314585 50TH ST SELLIN PAPER SUPPLIES 7511 05/16/00 $412.63 VAN PAPER CO. BAGS 314762 VERNON SELLING PAPER SUPPLIES 05/16/00 $200.36 VAN PAPER CO. T.P. 315447 GRILL GENERAL SUPPLI 6347 < *> $1,310.30* 210621 05/16/00 $798.04 VESSCO VACU MAINT, KIT 21327 WATER TREATMEN REPAIR PARTS 1277 < *> $798.04* 210622 05/16/00 $241.00 VINTAGE ONE WINES COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4082 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 $202.80 VINTAGE ONE WINES COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4157_ YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $443.80* 210623 05/16/00 $5,172.34 VOGEL PAINT & WAX TRAFFIC PAINT 334615 PAVEMENT MARKI PAINT 5431 < *> $5,172.34* 210624 05/16/00 $60.00 VOGT, GINA SWIMMING LESSON REFUN 050300 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F < *> $60.00* 210625 05/16/00 $191.16 VOSS LIGHTING LIGHT BULBS 2064603- VERNON OCCUPAN GENERAL SUPPLI 1157 < *> $191.16* 210626 0.5/16/00 $100.00 WALBRIDGE, DAVID BIG FUN SHOW 6 -1 -2000 050800 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $100.00* 210627 05/16/00 $90.23 WALSER FORD FRONT AXEL ASSEMBLY 82765FOW EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1118 05/16/00 $17:15 WALSER FORD TUBE ASSEMBLY 82772FOW EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1119 05/16/00 $14.88 WALSER FORD KEY 83036FOW EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1281 05/16/00 $6.80 WALSER FORD SWITCH ASSY. 83067FOW EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1308 05/16/00 $139.35 WALSER FORD LINK ASSEMBLY 83133FOW EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1308 < *> $268.41* 210628 05/16/00 $207.68 WALVATNE INDUSTIRES SERV NEW BATTERIES FOR COM 1627 YORK OCCUPANCY CONTR REPAIRS 7536 < *> $207.68* 210629 05/16/00 $71.99 WARNER INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY PAINT 1463061- GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 1247 < *> $71.99* 210630 05/16/00 $616.66 WARNING LITES SAFETY VESTS 34535 GENERAL MAINT SAFETY EQUIPME 1265 < *> $616.66* 210631 05/16/00 $619.73 WEST WELD SUPPLY CO. ELECTRODE, WIRE, GAUG 31061 EQUIPMENT OPER WELDING SUPPLI 1162 05/16/00 $480.84 WEST WELD SUPPLY CO. ELECTRODE, WIRE, CABL 31209 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 1276 < *> $1,100.57* 210632 05/16/00 $263.59 WH PENNEY CO INC. AMMUNITION 400839 POLICE DEPT. G AMMUNITION 3011 < *> $263.59* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 10 -MAY -2000 (13:31) page 32 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 210633 05/16/00 $35.43 WILKINSON, JENNIFER HERITAGE BALL PHOTO P 050400 COMMUNICATIONS COMMODITIES < *> $35.43* 210634 05/16/00 $100.00 WILLIAMS, GEOFF MAGICIAN 5 -25 -00 042500 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $100.00* 210635 05/16/00 $99.00 WILMOT, SOLVEI HEHA - HEALTH EXAM 031400 PUBLIC HEALTH CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $99.00* 210636 05/16/00 $225.00 WILSON SPORTING GOODS CO GOLF BALLS 2295937 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6209 < *> $225.00* 210637 05/16/00 $50.00 WINDHAM, CARRIE 1/2 REFUND DEPOSIT OF 042600 GOLF PROG RENTAL OF PROP < *> $50.00* 210638 05/16/00 $377.40 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 03.8837 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 $853.70 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 038838 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 $633.60 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 038839 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 $1,350.45 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 039202 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 $1,563.40 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI'039203 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $4,778.55* 210639 05/16/00 - $58.69 . WINE MERCHANTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 10305 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 - $58.69 WINE MERCHANTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 10306 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 - $58.69 WINE MERCHANTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI'10346 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 - $117.38 WINE MERCHANTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 10347 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 $546.41 WINE MERCHANTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 28630 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 $683.98 WINE MERCHANTS COST OF GOODS.SOLD WI 28631 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 $1,154.63 WINE MERCHANTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 28632 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 $1,070.28 WINE MERCHANTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 28824 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 $3,104.73 WINE MERCHANTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 28825 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 $338.86 WINE MERCHANTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 28826 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $6,605.44* 210640 05/16/00 $100.00 WONDER WEAVERS STORYTELLERS 5 -30 -00 042500 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $100.00* 210641 05/16/00 $11.00 WOODCOCK, JEFFREY CLASS B DRIVERS LICEN 050800 FIRE DEPT. GEN LIC & PERMITS < *> $11.00* 210642 05/16/00 $749.76 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 92863 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 $431.90 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 92966 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 $601.70 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 92967 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/16/00 $530.98 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 93010 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE < *> $2,314.34* 210643 05/16/00 $355.55 XEROX CORPORATION COPIER & METER COSTS 07441903 POLICE DEPT. G SVC CONTR EQUI CONTRACT 05/16/00 $745.00 XEROX CORPORATION MARCH BILLING 07462640 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI 3413 05/16/00 $38.13 XEROX CORPORATION EQUIP. RENTAL 07475112 ART CENTER ADM EQUIP RENTAL 05/16/00 $348.60 XEROX CORPORATION COPIER & METER COSTS 07490587 POLICE DEPT. G SVC CONTR EQUI < *> $1,487.28* 210644 05/16/00 $69.00 ZD JOURNALS INSIDE PHOTOSHOP 11339734 MEDIA LAB DUES & SUBSCRI < *> $69.00* _ COUNCIL CHECK n-uISTER 10 -MAY -2000 (1'- ) page 33 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM--- - - - - -- OBJECT-- - - - -PO -NUM --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 210645 05/16/00 $142.66 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE FIRST AID SUPPLIES 54163518 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI <*> $142.66* $908,848.99* COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY 10 -MAY -2000 (13:36) page 1- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ FUND # 10 GENERAL FUND $181,318.48 FUND # 12 COMMUNICATIONS $21,756.54 FUND # 15 WORKING CAPITAL $13,705.75 FUND # 23 ART CENTER $4,400.26 FUND # 25 GOLF DOME FUND $3,469.11 FUND # 26 SWIMMING POOL FUND $6,399.81 FUND # 27 GOLF COURSE FUND $75,871.50 FUND # 28 ICE ARENA FUND $10,410.92 FUND # 30 EDINBOROUGH /CENTENNIAL LAK $16,552.03. FUND # 40 UTILITY FUND $184,945.20 FUND # 41 STORM SEWER UTILITY FUND $1,568.76 FUND # 42 RECYCLING PROGRAM $37,935.20 FUND # 50 LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND $261,785.18 FUND # 60 CONSTRUCTION FUND $88,363.05 FUND # 61 PARK BOND FUND $367.20 $908,848.99* Copy Edina Ambulance 4801 -W 50th Street Edina, Mn., 55424 Re: Patient No. 0004123, Call 001149 y e 1 The forms you requested are enclosed. I believe Medicare will pay you their share, send balance on to Health Partners, who according to our plan pay 90% of that and send me notice of my share which i pay directly to you. I wish to compliment, commend, and thank the Edina Police and Edina Ambulance Service Personnel for their handling of the situation. I am not being facetious when I say that 1 have never been "Sir'd" so much as I was that day. To have received such care and concern and to have been treated with such courtesy not only alleviated the pain of the fall, but the pain of the indignity of the fall itself. I hope you have some means of conveying my feelings to the Officers and Paramedics. Sincerely, Thomas Cook 5515 33rd Ave-So. Minneapolis, Mn. 55417 '0V 0 1 � I ,'v leiu EDINA HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION TUESDAY, MARCH 28, 2000 7:00 PM - COUNCIL CHAMBERS Members Present Nancy Atchison Jim Campbell Bert Finsand Betsy Flaten Idelle Longman Sharon Ming Tom Oye Greg Winter Jim Zappa Members Absent Carol Carmichiel Eileen Supple Lynne Westphal Staff Present Susan Heiberg Guest Present Patience Ferguson Patience Ferguson, the new Diversity Coordinator for Storefront /Youth Action, was introduced and welcomed. Patience oversees the internal diversity initiative at Storefront as well as programs in the schools. She reported that diversity support groups are key in schools such as Richfield, Hopkins and Rosemount where team members (staff) act as facilitators. The goal in the schools is to create a supporting environment, and multi - cultural groups are made available for students to learn about diversity.. Storefront staff serve on diversity council's within the schools to supplement and add value to what the schools are doing. Patience indicated that Storefront is seeking ways to make services better and to identify potential opportunities for growth and development. She is currently looking at a new support group model with greater emphasis on youth development and youth leadership. Patience remarked that there is little healthy dialogue today regarding the issue of race, and that due to the emergence of culturally- diverse families within the community, opportunities need to be provided for good and honest communication and for ways to come together. A continued problem in the schools is that students do not feel supported in their ethnicity and religion. Patience stated that Storefront wants to partner with schools and families to help people understand each other and to work together. Currently, a group is being developed for Somali girls. Patience recently spoke with NAACP and WMEP regarding integration in the suburban schools and how to create a sense of community. She pointed out that it is everyone's responsibility to get along with others. She is hoping to get the opportunity to talk with Edina schools about a curriculum called "Project Respect" which has been piloted in Bloomington. An item she might present to them is the "Celebrating Diversity Tool Kit." Patience will meet with Beth Fagin at Storefront to find out what the social workers are doing in the Edina schools. Minutes Approved. The following correction was made in the minutes of February 22, 2000, regarding the geographical boundaries of the East Edina Housing Foundation: "its boundaries are east of Tracy Avenue (as if Tracy extended all the way south to West 78`h Street) and south of the Crosstown." The motion of Tom Oye to approve the minutes of February 22, 2000, as amended was seconded by Betsy Flaten; the motion carried. d� Slate of Officers. The Nominating Committee — consisting of Sharon Ming, Jim Campbell and Betsy Flaten— presented the following slate of officers for the year 2000: Chair, Betsy Flaten; 1` Vice Chair, Jim Zappa; and 2 °d Vice Chair, Sharon Ming. The motion of Jim Campbell to approve the slate of officers as presented was seconded by Idelle Longman; the motion carried. Betsy was welcomed back after successful surgery, and Jim Zappa chaired the rest of the meeting. Volunteer Recognition Reception. The Commission addressed the Volunteer Recognition Reception at Edinborough Park on Tuesday, April 25`h —the same night as the Commission's regularly - scheduled meeting. The motion by Nancy Atchison that the Commission participate in the event by recognizing Judith Gandy, the advisor of the Multi- Cultural Club at the High School, was seconded by Tom Oye; the motion carried. Community Council. Nancy Atchison, Chair of the Community Council, shared that there has been much discussion regarding the organization of the collaborative as a whole, with a focus on the issue of staffing at the local resource centers. Apparently, FamiLink Edina has the lowest number of staff among the four resource centers and as a result is only open 30 hours a week, rather than the optimum 40 hours. Nancy reported that the budget for the resource center is balanced for this year and that they are working with the Alliance for Families and Children to tap into LCTS funds. A number of calls received at the Center pertain to affordable housing issues. At the last Council meeting, the members broke into two groups and discussed issues concerning the operation of the local center and how it relates to the support hub. With staffing at the center being such a great concern, the question was raised concerning the leveraging of the human service agencies funded by the City of Edina. A recently - developed chart of the collaboration —HSSC —will be distributed to the Commissioners. Connecting for Kids. The Executive Summary of the results of the Search Institute Survey of Edina students grades 6 through 12 was discussed briefly. It was pointed out that it would be helpful to compare the Edina results with the national figures. This information will be made available with the packet material for the next meeting. Changing Faces /Changing Communities. Jim Campbell reported that he and Carol Carmichiel had facilitated discussion groups over a period of four weeks regarding issues surrounding immigration. This initiative— Changing Faces /Changing Communities —was sponsored by the League of Women Voters of Edina, and during this period of time, ideas surfaced which related to change or action that would be beneficial to the community. As a result, there was a forum in late March to brainstorm and bring these concepts into action, and the League is now searching for a group to take charge. Two action priorities were developed — partnering around the delivery of ESL in our community and setting a welcoming tone for immigrant newcomers —and discussion in these areas will take place on April 27`h at 7 PM in the Council Chambers with the Director of Special Services from Edina Public Schools and the Coordinator of SHAPE. Alleged Racial Harassment. A letter delivered to Edina City Hall regarding an alleged racial harassment was shared with the Commission. The reported incident had occurred at Valley View Middle School and was between two eighth graders. It was noted that the Commission has no jurisdiction in such matters but that a letter of concern to the School District would be appropriate. Greg Winter's motion —to write to the School Superintendent, copying the grievant and Valley View Middle School, stating that the letter received by the Commission was of great concern and that the Commission be apprised of any subsequent action —was seconded by Idelle Longman; the motion carried. New Date for Next Meeting. The Commissioners agreed to meet next month on the third Tuesday —April 18`'— instead of the regularly- scheduled fourth Tuesday, April 25`'', which would free up that night for the Volunteer Recognition Reception at Edinborough Park. Adjournment. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:10 PM. JZ/sh Respectfully submitted, Jim Zappa, 1' Vice Chair Edina Human Relations Commission • �1 A7 : EDINA HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 2000 6:30 PM - YORKDALE TOWNHOMES OF EDINA Members Present Jim Campbell Carol Carmichiel Bert Finsand Betsy Flaten Idelle Longman Sharon Ming Members Absent Nancy Atchison Staff Present Susan Heiberg Guests Present Scott Beckman Gordon Hughes Tom Oye Lynne Westphal Greg Winter (Eileen Supple and Jim Zappa attended the Advantage Center overview but did not stay for the Commission meeting.) Scott Beckman, Vice President of Advantage Services, welcomed the Commissioners to the Advantage Center of CommonBond Communities located at Yorkdale Townhomes of Edina.. He explained that the mission of CommonBond Communities is to create affordable housing communities as stepping stones to success with a vision that sees the dignity of all people. In 29 years, CommonBond Communities has grown to become Minnesota's largest non - profit provider of affordable housing and services. Its 36 housing communities are located in 25 municipalities throughout the Twin Cities, providing homes for more than 3,400 families, seniors and people with special needs. Its clients' average household income is $11,000 per year, and more than 775 of the residents are children and teens. Scott described the "more- than - housing" approach to achieving the mission —youth programs for residents focusing on academic achievement, self - sufficiency programs for adults focusing on career and job development, and independent living services for residents at senior sites. CommonBond's safe affordable housing, combined with caring Advantage Services, provides the way for people to move from economic insecurity to more stable ground. At the Advantage Center, youth who are enthusiastic about learning and researching life choices come every day to sign up for computer time. Additionally, youth of all ages participate in the Study Buddies and Homework Center programs to work one -on -one with volunteer mentors to improve their academic skills. At this time, the Commission and Scott moved to the Community Room, where Gordon Hughes, Edina's City Manager, was welcomed. Gordon provided background information regarding the City of Edina's commitment to participate in local housing incentives within the framework of the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act, through vehicles such as the HRA and the East Edina Housing Foundation. The Foundation was created to undertake and promote community development projects, to provide assistance to non - profit developers and sponsors of low and moderate income housing and to utilize block grants from the City or other governmental units to carry out its role. It is a non - profit entity governed by a five - member board, and its boundaries are east of Tracy Avenue (as if Tracy extended all the way south to West 78" Street) and south of the Crosstown —with activities being localized in the Edinborough and Centennial Lakes housing development. The Foundation has served as a 4'� conduit through which the HRA (the development authority for the City) provides financial assistance to certain purchasers of condominiums and is the holder of more than 250 second - mortgage loans. The Foundation currently has two programs in place: Edina Community Homebuyer Program and Edina Home Partners Program. The Homebuyer Program increases home ownership opportunities for low and moderate - income borrowers by providing additional funds for down payment and /or closing cost assistance for single dwelling homes. These non - interest - bearing second mortgage loans are paid off when the house is sold, upon maturity of the first mortgage or when the dwelling is no longer the borrower's principal residence. The Home Partners Program provides second mortgage loans for basic home improvements in conjunction with a single dwelling home purchase for low and moderate income borrowers. Funds can be used for structural improvements —not decorating or remodeling. Principal and interest must be repaid upon maturity of the loan, when the house is sold or when the dwelling is no longer the borrower's principal residence. Additionally, low and moderate - income homeowners may be eligible for below- market rate, home improvement financing funded through the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency. Gordon explained that Edina participates in the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act with the aim of establishing affordable and life -cycle housing goals; at this time, Edina does its best to maintain its current affordability index despite the continual loss of affordable units due to market forces. An issue in Edina is that homes are being renovated into unaffordable housing; there is not much available within the $135,000 range. Currently, there is a massive amount of infusion of capital within the city, and growth occurs with the combination of a willing property owner, a developer and a banker. Gordon intimated that the Commission's role might be to look at ways to bridge the cultural differences between the residents of Yorkdale Townhomes with the community as a whole and how to link the low- income community with the labor force. The Commission could look at ways to create a community 'in which one lives, works and plays – tackling the issue of how to develop a sense of awareness. Chair's Report. Betsy Flaten introduced and the Commission welcomed the new members - Idelle Longman, Bert Finsand and Greg Winter —and there was an opportunity for introductions all around. Minutes Approved. In the minutes of January 25, 2000, the paragraph regarding affordable housing was pointed out in order to make the following change: "that next month's meeting be a dialogue (instead of `an opportunity to dialogue') with the appropriate person on issues around affordable housing." The motion of Tom Oye to approve the minutes of January 25, 2000, as amended was seconded by Sharon Ming; the motion carried. Nominating Committee. The motion. of Betsy Flaten to create a nominating committee consisting of Sharon Ming, Jim Campbell and Betsy' Flaten was seconded by Lynne Westphal; the motion carried. The nominating committee will present a slate of officers at next month's Commission meeting. CDBG Funding. The public services portion of the year -2000 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) budget recommended by Planning staff was presented and discussed. Noting the decrease in available funds, the Commissioners nevertheless raised a concern regarding staff's recommendation to simply divide the balance remaining between GMDCA and H.O.M.E. after appropriating CASH's amount. Given the inadequacy of State funding to meet the ever - increasing need for childcare, a $4000 decrease to GMDCA would jeopardize its ability to continue moving families from "applications pending" and the `.`waiting list" to full service. Upon reviewing the reduced request for funding from H.O.M.E., the Commissioners noted that the East Edina Housing Foundation would be providing $12,900 to support the Program and additional money would come from the Greater Minneapolis Council of Churches. Apparently, Friends of H.O.M.E., an organization that solicits private donations, helps to fill the remaining gap between the City's CDBG funds and the total Program expense. The Human Relations Commissioners unanimously agreed that,'given the limited funds, it is imperative to continue the current level of support for GMDCA, notwithstanding this amount is $3000 below its proposal. The motion of Sharon Ming to approve the amounts submitted below for funding the public services portion of the year -2000 CDBG budget was seconded by Tom Oye: GMDCA $17,000 H.O.M.E. $ 9,189 CASH $ 1,100 The motion carried. It was agreed that a City planner be invited to next January's Commission meeting in order to begin the discussion of the year -2001 CDBG budget. The year -2000 proposed CDBG budget will go before the City Council for approval on March 6`h; Sharon Ming will represent the Commission. Community Council. Concerning FamiLink Edina, Sharon Ming reported that there is a staffing concern which prevents the Center from being open at all the designated times. The Center relies on contributed staff or volunteers from FamiLink partners for its staffing. These resource center staff respond to callers or visitors seeking connections to services and supports. Staff provide strength -based interviews, research and follow -up to individuals and families. When the staff are not taking calls, meeting with someone visiting the center or exploring_ possible referrals, they are developing an understanding of community resources and activities. They are also gaining skills in interviewing, using the FirstCallNet database and finding creative ways to help people. Sharon then explained revenue enhancement and the Local Collaborative Time Study (LCTS) regarding the Community Council's role in the development of a spending plan for Edina's LCTS dollars. The Council gets input from and endorsement by the School District who generates the funds and from the other local collaborative partners. LCTS is a program in which new funds are raised for collaboratives through reimbursements from federal entitlement programs for specific health and social services to children provided through schools and other organizations. The State of Minnesota authorized LCTS as part of the legislation establishing family services collaboratives and children's mental health collaboratives in 1993. FamiLink's Board of Directors entered into Hennepin County's LCTS Agreement in 1998, and currently Sharon Ming is one of the Edina representatives on the County's LCTS Policy Committee. Approximately $225,000 annually is generated from the LCTS in Edina's schools, and through the Community Council's development of a spending plan, most of the money goes back to the schools into programs such as family and learning support, asset building, mental health services and violence prevention. Connecting for Kids. Sharon Ming reported that Connecting for Kids — Edina's Asset Building for Youth Initiative —held a Town Meeting at the High School Auditorium on February 8`h at 7:00 PM. School District personnel and the Student Council President were a part of the program, and the results of the survey which was given to all 6 `h through 12 `h graders were reported by Dr. Judy Taccogna, Director /Education Sector of Search Institute. The Commission expressed interest in the results, wondering about cultural competency and how safe students felt in school. The Executive Summary will be given to each Commissioner. Changing Faces, Changing Communities. Lynn Westphal reported that the Edina League of Women Voters had undertaken an initiative made up of proactive discussions exploring issues surrounding immigration in co- sponsorship with Edina Public Schools, the City of Edina, various community organizations, churches, businesses and ethnic groups. On February 8`h, the initiative was begun with a panel preparing participants for leading at least four small -group discussions. Lynne, Carol Carmichiel and Jim Campbell will be small -group facilitators, and presently the discussions are going well. Upcoming Events. Three upcoming events were identified: 1) League of Minnesota Human Rights Commissions 1' Regional Meeting and Idea Exchange on March 25`h in Golden Valley; 2) City Council's Annual Meeting on March 16`h at Braemar Clubhouse; and 3) Volunteer Recognition Reception on April 25`h at Edinborough Park. Adjournment. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:15 PM. BF /sh Respectfully submitted, Betsy Flaten, Chair Edina Human Relations Commission i EDINA ASSET BUILDING STEERING COMMITTEE 'May 19 2000 Meetiny, Minutes ® Present: Chace Anderson, Sue Egan, Rob Holahan, Anthony Sussman, Kelly Crowther, Erica Fishman, Carl HoLmstrom, Betsy Flaten, John Keprios, Alice Randall, Yi Du and Doug Johnson (co- chair) Final Action Plan: The final draft of the action plan was reviewed. The group agreed to contact Doug if there were any further changes. In addition, the plan will be reviewed again. Report from Sub - Committee on Next Steps: Alice reviewed the progress of the initiative to date: * EPS adopts assets as part of its strategic plan (January, 1999) * The Edina Asset Initiative Task Force is formed (winter, 1999) * Asset presentation to EPS administrators by Mick Johnson, HealthSystems * Asset presentation at Braemar Golf Club to 185 key leaders (August, 1999) * Asset survey given to all Edina students grade 6 -12 (October, 1999) * Asset survey results report in a public Town Meeting by Search Institute (February, 2000) * Asset Initiative Task Force creates action plan (May, 2000). The sub - committee (Carl, Alice and John) reported on their recommendations. They proposed a series of two to three meetings to.ask for organizational commitment to the initiative. The first meeting would be with positional leaders. They wrestled with the question who are"the key positional leaders in this community. The group created a list that included: mayor, school board chair, superintendent of schools, city manager, business leaders, faith community leaders, medical community, key organization leaders, etc. This first meeting will be held in May. Alice will make the arrangements. Ken Dragseth and Gordon Hughes will be asked to host the event. Carl will be the keynote speaker. The second and third meetings will consist of key leaders (many of whom were at the August breakfast). The group suggested leaders of community organizations, student leaders, business leaders, police chief and other city department heads, principals and school administrators, etc. The task force will be asking those in attendance to commit their organizations to building a healthier community for kids. The task force will ask them what they can bring to the table and how we can help them achieve their asset goals. The purpose of the task force is to serve as a clearinghouse for these activities. The key is that we are not telling these groups what to do. Carl, John, Alice and Doug will put these events together. The second recommendation is to create a newsletter that will be put together about the asset initiative. Alice agreed to lead this effort. Those that want to help should give her a call. Betsy shared that she thought it would be a good idea to start soliciting follow -up input from the students involved in the survey. We now have a good sense of the data. It seems an appropriate time to follow -up and ask for more in depth opinion. Chace agreed to follow up with students. Suggestions from the group included: * Create a list of top ten things that would make your school a more caring environment. * What are the top ten things that contribute to an uncaring environment? * Would you like to be more involved in the decision making of the school? community? How so? Chace said he will put together a list of questions /activities and try to do them in mid -,May in the EHS home rooms. Erica asked if the middle school students should be included. Chace said he will speak with the middle school principals. If anyone has additional ideas, contact Chace. Students: Betsy asked if new students had been identified to join the committee. Doug has been in contact with Todd Olson and will call Todd for an update. Closing: Doug thanked the group for their good work. He will be in contact wyfli the` group regarding the next meeting date. 0 EDINA PARK BOARD 7:30 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS APRIL 11, 2000 MEMBERS PRESENT: Dave Fredlund, Chuck Mooty, Karla Sitek, George Klus, Andy Finsness, Scot Housh, Linda Presthus MEMBERS ABSENT: Andy Herring, Tom White, Floyd Grabiel, John Murrin STAFF PRESENT: John Keprios, Janet Canton OTHERS PRESENT: Ron Clark, Wally Case, Dan Young Dixon, Spencer Marsh, Jack Abrahamson, Jennifer Germain, Mike Madden, Jim Simons, Elaine Peterson, Kathleen Wannigman, Richard Jensen, Susie Nelson, Mary Ellen Pratt, Florence Mase, Susan Burchfiel, Thelma Johnson, Dale Nelson, Garth Dietrich, Pat Olk, Patsy Shaughnessy, Pat Stinson, Betty Heiam, Art Heiam, John Menke, CW Cohen, David Sousen, Becky Langford, Bruce Langford, Howard Bastian, Andrew Kaske, Paula Smuda, Stephen Ullom, Mark Dalquist I. APPROVAL OF THE MARCH 14, 2000 PARK BOARD MINUTES Dave Fredlund MOVED TO APPROVE THE MARCH 14, 2000 PARK BOARD MINUTES. Andy Finsness SECONDED THE.MOTION. MINUTES APPROVED. II. OLD BUSINESS - UPDATES A. Skate Park - Mr. Keprios indicated that he recently met with the park directors from Bloomington and from Richfield plus Greg Hanks from the Southdale YMCA. He noted that they are all very receptive to the idea of a joint venture skate park. He commented that the Bloomington Recreation Department is meeting tonight with a group of kids and parents who are very interested in the topic and have even identified some of the sites within Bloomington. Also, they really like the idea of a joint venture at the YMCA to which they are primarily talking about a tier 2 level where the YMCA would run it, supervise it and cover all of the costs, including insurance. Mr. Keprios indicated that this would not preclude us from doing a tier 1 at one of our local parks to get the kids hooked on it and then move on to the more challenging tier 2 skate park at the YMCA. He pointed out.that we may have to surrender some of our park land at Yorktown Park but that will be a subject for another Park Board meeting. We are making great progress and the three jurisdictions are considering an indoor facility. He noted there are a lot of pluses here, in that there are two additional communities who are very interested in coming forward with some dollars to make this happen, there may be some donations that could be acquired, plus the YMCA is willing to operate the facility and assume all liability. B. First Tier Trail - Mr. Keprios indicated that the architect has responded to the Park Board's wishes to look at some alternatives from 70`h Street. They have made an alternate route up through 66`h Street including Centennial Lakes and Yorktown Park, however, there are still some adjustments that need to be made. He noted that they hope to have this on the City Council agenda.for one of the May or June meetings. At that time the architect and the people from Hennepin Parks will give a presentation. C. Lewis Park Bandy and Soccer - Mr. Keprios indicated that at the last Park Board meeting staff was asked to explore some alternate surfaces for a possible joint use. He stated that he took that very seriously and has hired an architect as well as had some soil borings done at Lewis Park. He noted that a third party professional in field construction will give the Park Board recommendations. As a result, we will know whether or not a joint use for soccer and bandy is feasible. D. Off -Leash Dog Site - Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that a public meeting was held in the City of Minneapolis to which notices were only sent to Minneapolis residents even though the property is within the City of Edina limits. He indicated that Edina's Chief of Police did attend and told them that regardless of what they do they have to abide by Edina's ordinances. He stated that the Police Department sent out notices to Edina residents to inform them of the meeting at Linden Hills Park and the were some vocal Edina residents in attendance. Mr. Keprios noted•that currently there isn't adequate parking. However, he doesn't know enough to render a professional opinion but he does feel at the very least they need to go through the process of coming before the Park Board and then on to the City Council. Mr. Keprios explained that the people from Minneapolis have not discussed this with him yet so he has set up a meeting with them, as well as the Park Director from St. Louis Park to review and discuss the proposed project. E. Pamela Park Ponds - Mr. Keprios indicated that the memorandum from the Engineering Department is in regards to the storm water retention ponds and sanitary sewer lines that are being proposed for Pamela Park and Strachauer Park. This will also include some pathways that will be constructed throughout Pamela park. At the next Park Board meeting Wayne Houle, Assistant City Engineer, will give a formal presentation to which everyone will have a chance to respond to this issue. F. City School Referendum - Mr. Keprios indicated that he just returned from a meeting with two of the City Council members, two school board members, the superintendent of schools, the city manager and a few others along with all of the architects and engineers. He explained that they have narrowed it down to what is in and what is out of the plan. However, we still have issues to resolve on the memorandum of understanding. Mr. Housh asked what is the situation with the pool. Mr. Keprios indicated that the elected officials at the table indicated that the plan is to renovate the South View pool, fill in the 2 4 existing pool at Valley View and build a brand new 25 yard by.25 meter 12 ft. deep pool with a diving well attached. Mr. Keprios also commented that the dome is included and they are going with option two. He stated that all of the Park Board's recommendations are in with the exception of the lighted tennis courts. G. Donations/Memorials Policy - Mr. Keprios indicated that what this issue comes down to. is plaques in the parks. The question becomes do you or don't you want plaques in the park system. Once they are in the ground or on a structure they are expected by the donor to be in place forever. He noted that today he took 11 photos of plaques at Wooddale Park alone. He commented that these are not all necessarily negative things but when there gets to be too.many in a park system it starts to become a negative experience -for park users and that's what the donations /memorial policy is all about. He stated that we don't want to discourage donations, but he would like for everyone to look over his proposal and think about it for next month's meeting. He noted that he has come up with ways to recognize donations, some of them on a more permanent basis and some of them not. Mr. Klus asked the Park Board members to bring their thoughts to next month's meeting so that a vote can be made and this item can get off of square one. Ms. Presthus asked if there is anyone right now waiting to which Mr. Keprios replied there are some people waiting. He pointed out that there are definitely some people who will not donate if they don't receive a plaque in the park. Therefore, he feels we need to ask are those who are donating doing so to get a name on a plaque or are they truly doing it to improve the quality of their parks. III. YOUTH ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION PRESENTATIONS A. Edina Girls Traveling Basketball - Jim Simons, President of the Edina Girls Traveling Basketball, indicated that they just finished their 2000 season and this year had their largest number of participants at 132 girls playing. He explained that mostly they've been working on trying to enhance the skill level of all the girls coming into the program. He pointed out that last year for the first time they sponsored a summer camp for several weeks in June and several weeks in August and will be doing that again this year. He indicated Girls Traveling Basketball is different from the Edina Girls Athletic Association Basketball, which is a house league. Their season runs the typical basketball season; October through early March. He explained that this year was the first year that the 9'' grade program was turned over to the high school. He commented that they also work closely with Jenny Johnson at the high school. Mr. Simons indicated that from his understanding there are some web sites that are being developed and they will be working with a student who has volunteered to help put together a web site for the Edina Girls Traveling Basketball. He asked if there is going to be any type of Park and Recreation Web site to which they could be part of because it would certainly be helpful for registration, scheduling, etc. Mr. Simons commented that the big issue, as we all know, is the gym space and hopefully with the referendum things will work out. He stated that the Edina Girls Basketball is in support of the referendum and have informed the Park and Recreation staff to call them if they need their assistance 3 in any way. He explained that. they are looking at possibly cutting back the number of teams because of the lack of available gym times. B. Edina Girls Fastpitch Association - Dick Glover, President of Edina Girls Fastpitch Association, explained that it's a non - profit corporation existing to provide a developmental program of an organized fastpitch softball for girls ages 8 through high school. He noted that some of the goals of the association are sportsmanship, understanding fair play, develop the ability to accept victory or defeat graciously, develop the individual's fastpitch skills to the best of their ability and develop team skills, knowledge of the game and an attitude of team participation loyalty and responsibility. He indicated that this year there are approximately 100 girls participating and therefore they are fielding 6 teams. He explained that their season runs from the first week of May through the early part of July. Mr. Glover stated that the majority of their funding comes from player registration fees, their annual flower sale and their three Edina tournaments held at Van Valkenburg every year. He pointed out that one of the bigger challenges for Girls Fastpitch is going to be playing field accessibility, they realize that they are a small association, but in April and May playing fields get very crowded with fastpitch, slow pitch softball and adult softball. He stated that hopefully if the upcoming bond issue passes later this year it will help to relieve some of the congestion. He also noted that one of the reasons they really like to play at Pamela Park is because a couple of years ago they went in with the Edina Baseball Association and donated a batting cage next to the field at Pamela Park, therefore, the players can go in and hit a few pitches before their game where at other parks that is not an option. Mr. Glover pointed out that many of the other communities that they compete against do not have slow pitch softball, all they have are traveling and in -house fastpitch teams. Therefore, it's tough for them to compete every year. However, the last three years alone they have had two different age level state champions, three other teams that have finished second place in state and one other team that has placed third in the state. He commented that they are an up and going program. C. Edina Baseball Association - Dale Nelson, President of Edina Baseball Association, indicated that the purpose of the Edina Baseball Association is to provide many opportunities to learn to play baseball. This year there are nearly 1,100 participants registered. Their goal is for kids to learn to play baseball, have a lot of fun and promote a sense of personal accomplishment in learning the game as well as learning very important life values: leadership, cooperation, sportsmanship, and determination. Mr. Nelson commented that currently the challenge with this many players has been the traveling program, at what age group should we have traveling baseball as well as should we be cutting kids. He indicated that they currently have 13 traveling teams and 75 house teams. Mr. Nelson stated that they are trying to provide an opportunity for all kids to play baseball and the question is how do you select who plays at what level. Another question is how do we find the right number of fields for the right number of teams El because more traveling teams have been added in order for more kids to have a chance to play traveling baseball. Mr. Housh asked if the baseball numbers have been growing over the last few years. Mr. Nelson replied that the numbers have stayed fairly constant. Mr. Keprios noted that they have been working with all of the athletic associations to get a registration software package in place where Park and Recreation would literally handle all of the registrations. This way everyone in the community could register for all programs either by phone or internet. He noted that this would be a great service for the community and indicated that all of the athletic associations have given him the preliminary okay on this. At this point, we are waiting for a recent upgraded registration software package to be proven reliable in other test site communities before moving forward. IV. GRANDVIEW SQUARE - SHERWOOD PARK Mr. Keprios went through a brief power point presentation summarizing the Grandview Park/Sherwood Park project. Mr. Keprios explained that some people refer to Sherwood Park as Richmond Hills Park because that was the name assigned to the development when it was built. He stated that regardless of how the project turns out he would like to see the current misleading sign removed and have a new "Richmond Hills Neighborhood" sign relocated more appropriately near the first private property line. He would like to place a new park identification sign in the park so that everyone knows it's called Sherwood Park. Mr. Keprios explained that Sherwood Park is just over 1 %z acres and has a well building, playground area, picnic area, open play area and a non - scheduled ball field area. The park is not scheduled for anything unless someone has a permit for a neighborhood picnic or social function. Mr. Keprios commented that the park also serves as a buffer between the residential and commercial properties. He noted that Sherwood Park is classified as a mini -park which means it is less than 2 acres in size and is primarily there to serve pre- school age children. He pointed out that the larger parks with playing fields that are closest to Sherwood Park are Garden Park and Highlands Park. Mr. Keprios added that there are 11 mini -parks in Edina, each one a.little bit different. Mr. Keprios gave a little background on the property. He explained that the City purchased the property and than interviewed and received presentations from a variety of developers. He noted that the one chosen was Opus/Ron Clark, which is a terrific developer. At the time of their proposal it did not include use of any piece of Sherwood Park. However, what has happened between then and now is very important. The library indicated that they would not accept the proposal the way it was originally presented because they wanted to have more visibility and if they didn't get that the deal was off. Therefore, the developers went back to the drawing board and came up with a better relocation for the combination senior center /library. Secondly, the City Council asked the developers to design a "town square" theme to the architecture of the development with a center park area. Therefore, this isn't the developers changing their mind, they are 5 following the orders of the City Council and the current design is their response to the City Council's request. Mr. Keprios indicated that the surrounding neighbors have a vested interest in this development as well as the future residents of Grandview Square, which would include 190 units. He commented that we also have to look out for the interests of the future senior citizens and the future library patrons as well. Mr. Keprios pointed out that they still have to serve the interest of the Hennepin County Board because without their blessing there is no deal with the relocation of the library. Mr. Keprios explained that the reason why the library is a component of this development is because the city has a strong desire to capture the property next door to city hall because we are in desperate need of space to renovate city hall. Mr. Keprios indicated that with the current plan there are a few positives and a few negatives. A negative is that he feels it appears that the playground equipment is too close to the road. The current plan also has a negative impact with regards to its function as a buffer and basically consumes too much park land in his view. Mr. Keprios indicated that in his view the open play area is an improvement. Also, the new pathway system that's part of the project is a positive addition. He pointed out that the access to the town square park will ultimately be a very big plus not just for the new residents but also for the existing residents. Mr. Keprios explained that as the park stands today it's approximately 1.55 acres and after the redevelopment of the open space it would become approximately 1. 15 acres. Mr. Keprios indicated that his recommendation to the Park Board would be that we should work further with the developers to explore all of the possible alternatives so we use less land and possibly even not use any existing park land at Sherwood Park. We need to exhaust every alternative that's available to us so that we don't consume any existing park. He noted that this is also in sync with what the planning commission is recommending as well. Mr. Keprios then showed some layouts of the area and explained that if the developers had a choice in the matter they would rather not take any of their park, they are following the directions of the City Council. There is a need to create enough tax increment in the district's remaining 10 years of existence so that we can build a public facility that is needed as part of the project. Ron Clark explained that he would be building the residential portion of Grandview Square and the Opus Corporation would build the senior center, library and office building. Mr. Clark stated that they are marching to the City Council's request and in order to make the financial work they need to create this much real estate value which is approximately 190 units and an 80,000 sq. ft. office building. He noted that these numbers were proven by the city's tax increment financing consultant., Mr. Clark commented that it's a difficult situation to satisfy the city's needs and respond 100% to the neighborhood. Jack Buxell, from J. Buxell Architects, indicated that we need to put some of this into context, currently there are 47 existing residents but we are also dealing with 190 future residents as well as office building tenants as well as other surrounding residents who will potentially use this area. Mr. Buxell explained the area and noted that it will not only 3 be available to the residents of this community but to the greater community as a whole. Therefore they are trying to provide, in a sense, a very holistic solution. Mr. Buxell indicated to the residents that he can understand their perception that they are losing a facility. He explained that within the context of their charge they are trying to provide uses that are presently existing in the park. Although they can't provide them in exactly the same places, their hope is to provide very similar uses. Mr. Buxell indicated that with the current plan they are trying to retain the uses that are now there with the play area and open field area. He noted that this will also be used by the community of condominium owners in the sense that this was part of the walking path system that they would use. He stated that they would do some enhancements around the perimeter in terms of sitting areas, flower beds, etc., that would bring another kind of level to the existing park facility. Mr. Buxell explained that in a sense he thinks the residents feel they have been deceived. He noted that the initial plan that was proposed literally used the entire park and tried to relocate the park to the center of the development. When that was called into question they came back with a plan that stayed out of the park completely. Mr. Buxell pointed out that in the initial proposal the school bus barn was being moved out and that freed up land to generate additional tax increment dollars which allowed them to build additional underground parking. However, when the school district withdrew their offer, that option went away and they literally had to replace all of the underground parking onto the surface. Therefore, from a land consumption standpoint, this plan represents literally the best they can do in terms of building. Ultimately, they are all in agreement that this is a decision that the City Council has. Mr. Buxell stressed that he hopes everyone can see, in a sense, the degree to which they have tried to work with the existing community, provide for the future community and retain the uses that are there. He noted that really, in the long run, no one is short changed. Jack Abrahamson, resident, complimented Mr. Keprios and noted that he has been maintaining the Richmond Hills sign for years and hangs the flag up and indicated that it would be wonderful to get a new sign. ' He then stated that he raises the opposition to the loss of a park of the neighborhood for a number of different reasons. He noted that it is redundant that they are up here battling again. He explained that they want a positive site to build on but they don't feel that downsizing the park and adding a town square is beneficial to the community. As they see it there are 47 homes there and to downsize the park and add 400 to 500 additional people who have the potential of using it not only downsizes it in acreage or in size of square footage but it downsizes it tremendously with the amount of population. Mr. Abrahamson commented that it is his understanding when Richmond Hills was developed there was a requirement that there be a green area and if that area is taken away the little community is totally isolated. He noted that from the mailer that was sent out the little piece of green space that they have shown seems absolutely unreasonable as a place where their children and grandchildren can play. He noted that someone needs to think this through again, there has got to be a better way. He noted that's their park, they can't go to another park and maybe that's being selfish, but 7 it's the only green area they have in the immediate neighborhood. Mr. Abrahamson stated that for future generations they need to maintain what they have now for the good of the neighborhood, the children and grandchildren. Mr. Klus indicated that he knows the green area is a big concern for all of us but asked Mr. Abrahamson what else he feels they will be losing besides the green space. Mr. Abramson replied that they are losing a configuration which puts them closer to the 300 plus residents who are also going to have the opportunity to use that green space. That in itself is an extreme competition compared to what is now there with 47 homes. To put that many new residents in that area, from his perspective, overburdens the amount of green space. There is going to be a tremendous amount of competition there. Howard Bastian, resident, asked if the reason why you are not using the approved plan is because it is not financially workable. He noted that as he read the presentation it seems as though so much needs to be done in order for the numbers to work for the tax revenue. Mr. Buxell replied that the initial approved plan did not take any of Sherwood Park because it included a parking garage that would be replacing the bus facility and therefore freed up land to generate tax increment revenues. and then that generated money which then put parking underground. However, with the garage no longer part of the overall project that revenue has to be replaced within the development. John Menke, resident, indicated that he lives right across the street from Sherwood Park and will be looking at a 48 ft. building. He then asked the Park Board to please reject the current Opus Park proposed development plans and instruct them to submit a revised plan that takes no land at Sherwood Park. He stated that this park has been a buffer to the neighborhood from one and two story high low impact commercial buildings which are going to be replaced with over 40 ft. high buildings. He noted that this plan is coming much closer to the neighborhood than any other plan ever brought before them: Mr. Menke commented that he has lived in Edina for 22 years and at his current residence for 10 years. He explained that he built his house because it was near a small neighborhood park. He noted that he used to live near Chowen Park and can't imagine the city putting a 50 ft. building over there. Mr. Menke pointed out that this is the only developer that ever proposed taking park land since he has lived in Edina as well as the only one the City Council that has proposed taking park land. Again, Mr. Menke asked the Park Board to instruct the developers to come back with something different. Rich Dahlquist, resident, indicated that he has been an Edina resident for 25 years and has two small children and uses the park regularly. He asked why would the City Council approve the plan that was submitted last fall when the library and senior center had apparently not been consulted as to whether or not it was acceptable. However, if they did then why didn't they make the adjustments before the plan was approved by the City Council to go ahead. He noted that if this was the plan that was on the table last fall he doubts considerably that the City Council would have ever approved it. He stated that he finds it very irresponsible of the developers and of the City Council, if they were a party to this, to approve that plan without giving the senior center and library involved up front with their approval. Mr. Dahlquist stated that when he looks at the town square he sees that as a "feels good" place from people who don't live in the area. He asked why not take the building that ,'s proposed on the park and build a square condo building where the town square is. He stated that when you look at the southern part of the site there are other ways that the space could be twisted around and re -used and town square could be a parking lot. Mr. Dahlquist asked who will control the use and regulate the access to the town square. Mr. Keprios replied that the town square would become the property of the City of Edina and that the new residents and office tenants would pay a fee to help maintain it. However, as far as controlling access it would be a public park and anyone can use it just like any of the other public parks. Garth Dietrich, resident, commented that he doesn't think it's fair that because the School District won't relocate the bus garage and now the residents are paying for it. They are losing their park to pay for something that the city had approved otherwise. Their property value is not going to go up by staring at a 50 ft. building. Pat Stinson, resident, indicated that if you look at how many condos are being proposed there will be four times as many people compared to how many are now there with approximately only 30% of the land. He noted that is not counting the library, senior center and office building. He stated that it seems short-sided because you think you are getting something for free but by putting too much concentration there you are not getting it for free. He noted that he thinks it would be smarter to cut down the size and maybe raise some bonds. He stated that he doesn't mind paying a little more in taxes to have better aesthetics and a better neighborhood. Again, he noted that it is just too short-sided to see four times as many people in that small of an area. Pat Olk, resident, stated that he has lived in this neighborhood almost ten years and uses the park a lot. He noted that town square will not compensate for the loss of the park. He asked the Park Board to please not accept this proposal. Elaine Peterson, resident, indicated that she feels totally entrapped by this huge, unattractive building. She noted that when Mr. Clark proposed the initial plan cutting down the size of the park was not even a consideration. Ms. Peterson commented that she doesn't know where else in Edina there is a four story building backed up like this into a residential area. This is definitely going to depreciate their property value. Mr. Klus indicated that he appreciates all of the comments from the neighborhood group and from the developers and architects. Mr. Housh stated that there were a lot of issues discussed, some had to do with parks and some had to do with other things. However,.as a Park Board we are concerned about the use of the parks, that is our main focus. Mr. Keprios commented that the issue before you is the proposed use of existing park land for Sherwood Park. Mr. Housh indicated that Mr. Keprios' recommendation is that as a Park Board we encourage the developers to go back and .look again and try to find a way to not lose existing park space. Mr. Keprios commented that his recommendation to Park Board is to make a recommendation to the X City Council that encourages us to work further with the developer to explore every possible alternative so that we don't have to use any existing park land. Ms. Sitek asked whose recommendation is the town square and where did that idea come from. Mr. Keprios replied that it was a direction from the City Council. Mr. Finsness asked what the proposed price range is for the condominiums. Mr. Clark responded $200,000 to $400,000. Mr. Fredlund asked what would be the configuration of these units, two bedroom, three bedroom, etc., and who will be occupying these places. Mr. Clark replied that he.thinks it will be a pretty diverse group of people although he feels the number one perspective buyer will be the empty- nesters or early retirees. He indicated the plan includes some two -story town homes as well as a one level flat condominiums. Mr. Finsness asked if there are, any laws in place about taking existing park land. Mr. Keprios replied there is an old policy on the books that states we should do everything in our power to avoid having to surrender and/or sell park land. It's basically a policy to give a vision to the future city councils to try to work toward that goal knowing that it may not always be possible. Mr. Keprios indicated that the intent of the existing policy is to have a no net loss in existing park land. Ms. Sitek stated that she has a problem with the town square being used to supplement the land that's being taken. She noted that as a mother of four she knows that the people who will be living in the condominiums are not going to want children running around the square. She worries that this is not going to be park property in the real sense of a park. Mr. Keprios commented that if the town square park concept is approved by the City Council as it rests today it will likely be a passive park, a place for people to picnic, small gatherings and outdoor library classes. It will most likely not serve as an active park. Andy Finsness MOVED THAT PARK BOARD TAKE MR. KEPRIOS RECOMMENDATION VERBATIM, THAT IT'S OUR RECOMMENDATION THAT WE ASK THE DEVELOPERS TO LOOK FURTHER WITH THE CITY TO EXPLORE OTHER POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVES IN EFFORTS TO SACRIFICE EVEN LESS AND IF POSSIBLE NONE OF THE EXISTING PARK LAND AT SHERWOOD PARK. Linda Presthus SECONDED THE MOTION. Mr. Klus commented that he never wants to see park land taken away. It's a tough thing to take park land away especially since we fight so hard for our green areas and at the same time he hears the tax increment financing issues that the city has placed upon the developer. The developers have to develop so much revenue to support what they are trying to do and these are tough issues for both the city and the developer. The i[17 developers are at the mercy of the City in a lot of ways. He indicated that he is in support of the motion and is hopeful that there is some way that we can do less impact upon the neighborhood and less impact upon this park. He noted that adding this town square feeling is nice and it's going to look great but it's not going to be functional and the functionality of our parks is a big issue. Mr. Keprios pointed out that he never intended to imply that the town square was going to be a replacement for what was lost at Sherwood Park. The two parks will likely have very different functions altogether. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. ADJOURNMENT Scott Housh MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 9:25 P.M. Karla Sitek SECONDED THE MOTION. MEETING ADJOURNED. 11 1 III STACK RICE 4801 HILLTOP LANE o EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 (612) 927 -8372 Q�� FA4-v"( _rP I've a-h. `dam VA- � t . �'. Wes. *+'-',J 4 w �91N�1rrL o e • Pod May 3, 2000 City, of Edina Daniel E. Shebuski Edina Pet Hospital PA 5237 Eden Avenue Edina, MN 55436 Dear Dr. Shebuski: Thank you for your letter of April 24, 2000, which posed a number of questions concerning the acquisition of your property for the Grandview Square Redevelopment Project. As you know, we have discussed your situation on several occasions during the past months. ` As you know, the HRA has entered into a Letter of Intent with Opus Construction and Ron Clark Construction. This Letter of Intent provides that Opus /Clark will undertake negotiations with respect to the acquisition of properties required for the development including your parcel. The Letter of Intent also provides that if such negotiations fail, Opus /Clark may request that the HRA exercise its power of eminent domain to acquire the properties. At this point, no such request has been made and, therefore, in my view it would be inappropriate for the City and the HRA to interject itself into the discussions. Ultimately the HRA will need to decide if proceeding with eminent domain is advisable under the circumstances. Please don't infer from my comments that the City is dismissing the comments or questions which you have raised in your letter. We understand fully the concerns that this redevelopment proposal has created for you. However, it would not be appropriate. for us to respond to each of your questions at this time for the reasons noted above. The City Council will shortly be faced with important decisions as to whether or not to proceed with this project. I believe the Council Members will take into account the questions and concerns which you have raised in your letter. Sincerely, Gordon L. Hughes City Manager GLH /dw cc: Mayor and City Council City Hall (612) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 826 -0379 City Of Edina May 3, 2000 Owen R. Husney 3920 West 44`' Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Husney: The City Council has received your correspondence of April 22, 2000, which requested reimbursement for landscape materials which have been installed on your property. Your letter outlined the reasons for requesting that the City reimburse you for these expenses. After again reviewing your situation, it is our position that it would be inappropriate for the City to use public funds to reimburse you for these expenses. Sincerely, Gordon L. Hughes City Manager GLH /dw cc: Mayor and Council City Hall (612) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 826 -0379 I INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 273 Regular Meeting, May 8, 2000, 7:00 P.M. 2nd Floor Cafeteria, Edina Community Center AGENDA Determination of Quorum and Call to Order Approval of Minutes of Meeting of April 17, 2000 PRESENTATION - "On the Middle Shelf" - South View Middle School 643 ACTION Agreement Page 357 Personnel Recommendations 644 -646 358 Expenditures Payable on April 24, 2000, appended 647 359 Expenditures Payable on May 8, 2000, appended 648 360 Revised General Fund Budget, 1999 -2000, appended 649 361 City of Edina /ISD #273 Joint Facilities Project 650 40 362 Valley View Concrete Bid 651 363 High School Paving Bid 652 364 Lawn Mower Purchase 653 365 Highlands Playground Equipment 654 366 Purchase of Hewlett Packard Computers 655 367 Purchase of Toshiba Laptop Computers for Staff 656 368 Purchase of Reason Computers 657 369 Phone System Upgrade 658 370 Pay Rate for Lay Readers 2000 -01 659 CONSENT 371 Lease Agreement with Children's Yamaha Music Schools of Minnesota, Inc. 660 372 Lease Agreement with the City of Edina 661 40 373 Lease Agreement with Daystar Ministries 662 374 Lease Agreement with Employment Action Center 663 .q 375 Lease Agreement with Family Intervention Project 664 . 376 Lease Agreement with General Federated Women's Clubs 665 377 Lease Agreement with Hennepin South Services Collaborative 666. 378 Lease Agreement with Minnesota Council for Gifted and Talented 667 :379 Lease Agreement with Minnesota Distance Running Association,. 668 380 Lease Agreement with Minnesota Waterfowl Association 669 381 Lease Agreement with Minnesota Wildlife Heritage Foundation 670 382 Lease Agreement with Republicans - Senate District 42 671 :383 Gift from Jean Holm 672 :384 Gift from Edina High School PTSO 673 385 Gift from South View Middle School Parent council 674 386 Gift from Washburn Elementary PTA 675 387 Gift from Oak Grove Intermediate School PISA 676 388 Commendation of Laura Tueting Nelson 677 J HEARINGS OF INDIVIDUALS, DELEGATIONS, AND PRESENTATION OF PETITIONS FROM THE PUBLIC ON ANY ISSUE ( *SEE ATTACHED DETAIL.) REPORT Edina High School Update Middle School Scheduling Process INFORMATION ,389 Enrollment as of April 28, 2000 678 390 Debate Trip to Lexington, Kentucky 679 391 Highlands Grade 4 -5 Hyland Park Trip 680 -681 392 Staff Recognition 682 -683 Adjournment * Persons who wish to address the Board are requested to complete and submit an appropriate form to the Board Secretary prior to the designated hearing time. when recognized, each individual shall identify himself /herself and the group represented, if any. He /She shall then state the reason for addressing the Board and shall be limited in time at the discretion of the Board chair. Individual employees of the School District or representatives of employee organizations shall have utilized administrative procedures before making a request to address the Board. _901NyK May 10, 2000 Dear Mayor Maetzold, Messrs. Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, and Ms. Faust, We are writing to express our opposition to the proposal to build a field house next to Normandale Elementary School and to register our concern with a decision - making process that appears seriously flawed to us. We are opposed to the siting of the field house next to Normandale because we believe the site is already overcrowded with facilities and the field house will further compromise the security of the school. The new project would also worsen access on a site that already experiences significant access problems. We were dismayed at the original proposal to hold a referendum on the fieldhouse and other facilities improvements in May, at a time when most Normandale families had not even heard about the project. While the omission may not have been intentional, the failure to communicate with and consult the school community has left a legacy of distrust. We write to advocate that the referendum question be 1) pushed to the general election in November and 2) be split into two parts so that necessities such as classroom additions are separated from the issue of building the fieldhouse. The referendum should be held in November and not September because the general election would draw the most voters and constitute a more equitable venue for deciding on a tax issue. We do not think that necessities such as classroom additions at Concord and Valley View should be bundled into one referendum question with the fieldhouse project which is clearly optional. This bundling pits parents who legitimately support classroom additions against us parents who believe the fieldhouse project to be misguided and detrimental to the children of Normandale Elementary. While we would be pleased to pay more taxes to support classroom additions at other schools in the district, we are opposed to paying taxes for a fieldhouse. Sincerely, Ma ee Paul Glewwe 6704 West Trail Edina Mn 55439