Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2000-07-18_COUNCIL PACKET
AGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL JULY 18, 2000 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Commissioner, Council Member or citizen so requests it. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the Agenda. * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA - Regular Meeting of July 5, 2000 Rollcall II. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS - as per pre -list dated 7/12/2000, TOTAL: $717,776.63 III. ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of July 5, 2000 II. AWARD OF BIDS * A. CITY HALL ROOF REPLACEMENT III. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS A. Traffic Safety Staff Review of July 10, 2000 B. PUBLIC HEARING Edina Wellhead Protection Plan C. Authorize Staff to Retain Vanguard Appraisals, Inc. Services * D. Set Hearing Date Cable Franchise Applications (9/5/00) * E. Resolution 2000 -71 Approving Amendments to City's Deferred Compensation Plan I and Plan II F. Set Hearing Date Vacation of Public Utility & Drainage Easements, Phase I, Grandview Square (8/15/00) G. Blue Ribbon Committee H. Antenna Request - Sprint Spectrum: Edina Fire Department (6250 Tracy Ave) Agenda/ Edina City Council July 18, 2000 Page 2 IV. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS V. CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS VI. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES VII. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL VIII. MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEM IX. FINANCE Rollcall A. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS As Per Pre -List Dated 7/12/2000 TOTAL: $1,511;393.55 And For Confirmation Of Pay. Of Claims As Per Pre -List Dated 7/12/00 TOTAL: $902,378.43 Tues Aug 1 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Tues Aug 15 Budget Hearing 5:00 P.M. Tues Aug 15 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Tues Aug 22 Budget Hearing (Continuation) 5:00 P.M. Mon Sep 4 LABOR DAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed Tues Sep 5 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Tues Sep 12 PRIMARY ELECTION DAY Tues Sep -19 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Tues Oct 3 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Tues Oct 17 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL. CHAMBERS I \. ,MTN, ■ Sprint Wireless Antenna Request: rum o -loc 'on Fire Station #1 - 6250 Tracy Avenue � Ems, ay ``CURl'C)Itri)Y" Ah 62+ A 6205 62,17 ry w` 6208 Ij.. . 6209' `Colonial Wa 6 3 �'.yL. 6 _Zw -r' 623 r * ?` 6301 6� O.+' 6241 62 ' 625(1" L 6304 1 6315 I 6305 hw ;aY 62�. _ - 63oa ao9 - • 63 x 6313 ' 6,338 !n 5 itt Proposal • Install 6 Panel Antennas 62 fee m the base of the existing monopole. Exit antenna array is at 76 feet. • Takeover our existing garage stall for g and equipment • Construct Fire Department new and larger garage stall to house special rescue trailer • Reserve right to add 3 additional antennas a a future time Proposed Location ro�til� 5 TOWER ELEVATION It Proposal Top Vief Installation ANTENNA PLAN N yr - ANA �1 o e �= ` Y1] C01I!)liiltn` E t� F t � x4 _ •___. .« r EDIHR FIN! ENANIMEN Ix r nnnS� tr � 44" 'e.. �EDIMAN�FIR 3r q1 Y�141 DEPARfMf �- r c \tCOA, a'OR+��„ dr,,, �ron'_.nSc dN , M R b � � ., 1R 1 R,� ��+ Iyt�r • , M �,c '�?.. a �' -`, t,,, - "ii if ' 7 " t print Prop • Expand Existing Fire Dept. Garage Stall • Construct Larger Stall for Fire Dept. • Variance Required - proposed 26' rear setback - Ground Equipment r - � OAID NO. 6? .. MTF PI AN �hv J print Prop I - Ground Equipment Parking L t ¢O ^M I CV M 48. ' — - o�O ' I o o " N I Proposed 12' -00' .4�. V / / / New 22 x 3 Proposed Fire Station Sprint Lease Storage Gar ge Area Inside Existing Building Addition / / / ng 4' 0 W v 4 i + • • • print Propbsal - Ground Equipment Addition to match existing struc e Hides Antenna Ground Equipment Meets need of fire department for larg 16' -f' up= "WCUw SOUTH ELEVATION "W MW am= Fes►w 'oo,mac"WK Doom N" som L 81-w � W-0, z d._o. mm awom o ow OVU& PAO Dow r-o- �r-e- ire -Why need for larger space • Existing garage stall contains mber used in structural collapse and e 'al rescue calls • NSP donating trailer to hold lumber • Trailer will not fit in existing garage sta` I • Currently must load lumber after call for help is made o e \^CURI�OA� �40� sm[SI ■MOIKO MIDNO C L A • + ',- � n a cam, {���. ., � �, ! ♦(� silo � � ^ . 4 ' � Was" q - , � � 1 , � . b ,�f-' ■ Grp � r�,I Tt,1ry w w ::tea h,►- , .. a "L /ANA �j'� 01 uwarsed Expansia -Y t VAL AW. D. Vim rr , - WF s of Lease • $15,000 /year for 6 antennas • Right to .locate 3 additional antennas for $1,000 /year /antenna • Initial term 5 years with an option for 4 conse tive periods of 5 years each • Renewal terms increased by greater of MN CPI o \ 20% • City waives lease payment for construction costs (approx. $60 /square foot) of additional stall. City receives credit for square footage taken by Sprint. Adva e of Proposal • No height added to existing an • Consistent with ordinance in strivin t minimize number of freestanding mo o in City • Allows City to receive more usable space\with no outlay of cash • Approve a A'ct'ain s Needed ntenna concepts ct to approval of variance by Zoning �a�d of Appeals • If variance approved, staff will prep lease. • Sprint Representatives are here for questions IC , MAm Vanguard A Reappraisal Con, sals, Inc. t Req' t: Improved Single FamilyResidenc' July 18, 2000 yard Proposal ification • Current data 27 to 30 years old • Property data cards out of date and p ly inaccurate � • Unable to complete mandated quartile revi • Only able to keep pace with new construction`Oue to size of staff • Values trended for 27 to 30 years creating \ equalization concern • Data maybe inaccurate and therefore suspect • Cost manuals were not maintained so base rates a out of date and not supportable ses V" ee uard Proposal Old Pro rty Data Card RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY RECORD AND APPRAISAL CARD "! ADDRESS _.i��5.PZ �/�ll� .._.R ��c... _ _�...._...___.�r. PLAT NO. 7 FPARCEL N0..•..L.l�.ar -`• ` DESCRIPTION OF PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE OTHER STRUCTURES GLE DWLG. Yr. Built G w a Grado „, U., oI Storks <29 Coest. Cast �.TI. OWLG. Ohsarvad Physical Condition: Good -____ Normol_'/t „ Foie Poor Ma. Ramat GARAGE Grade Yr. guilt..______._..AM Found. Floor fcbut RoaF i3rG- .+t• - - -. Eatcrior Finish —: ! Overhead 14= Auto Control L_ UND TION ROOF PLUMBING .ROOMS WIRING aft Flat I W.I•, 'l.i Room AB BREEZEWAYJ Describe: Blk, Gohl• p ell L Pump Serer fining +1 qc W id Conduit BULLT -I rr uar opt c a roo.s •a last ETEgtoR wA Sh Asp o 1 Cues o Dan Bpakco,rs YARD IMPROVEMENTS Driveways, Fences. Ret. Wolb• Barbecue Pits, Describe: ,s Police,. Strimatiag Paoh6 Etc. Y;: -d � „ • j � ' l r � [°•.� r' zov Y 3 is `P.. % 1 sad 5b.01.9 in ood i Iht i Fiit•1 Rec. Ran. Chuw Slm tl ate al t Bath 42 Fi.t.) Utility E.tra Kir. Ca 11 an • 1 n ifarar 1 400 o ompes 1 on 6 .:lXo A J Sakes W. I. s.ft.01 INTERIOR 1 I r asha r va naa er or a e n. nu o A TFITa— Solfwood Fivers OUT BVIgIN Sheila, Cobioq, Baatlronsa, Shops, GrdeahPllser, te. Dcet:rlbe: 191: Nt5 �weEe. ,f���re" !Gt w 6!e.•rrsbr�(•••rI ' a or Poc• i ap eee. m o encreI. F osrs i • Fr•1 rep ss utnde ao eum oorr Cw. Im. a of ri prc• m ted Ftcars aU Botocr bRrC ed n o rlm IP <. m he n s arc u n BUILDING DIAGRAM AND OUTBUILDINGS, Draw a on mn i . mass, tn: p•r o ami m. n : : : : : : : : : :: : : :.: : :.. :: .: :: : : : : : : : : : .: : : .,. : : : : - , i�� . •. .r,. • • • . e4.- ...d.'•a - . . - . . h err .�YyT _ S .._ 7.�s� r.i . . . . . . . . - . . tpq • i�: t� �. _ - .. , . . . . . . . . . •• . . . . . . . . . , . ... . . . .- .. . �, ' :qtr _ . . . .. ... . .. . . . . :.: - :: _ -(1�• ro :: ... _,.RLC . _ - ... . . .. . ?X3�.......... art _ •. �. . ... . . . . . . . . . . . .:. .:.. ,.. ,..._ . . . .. :r, . :... .. . ... ... .. . . . . ... . . . . . . •. : _ .. ........... .. ... .... .. .... .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... ,. - 1 Cca— 11 at Appraisal X', .F +• T ''y^" char ntertor nspacte ea STRUCTURAL VALUE COMPUTATIONS STRUCTURES DIMENSIONS AREA S0. FT, RATE'S.F.. r OEP. 4 ORS. %OFF NET RATE S. MARKET VALUE ' �Chorpu R Z_ c r tless.•nf Finlahed •M• Cast X f O ABO 18 r 10. umh 8n1lt -1 G Mitt. 1 5 Ibr a Ir.'s 1 TOTAL 3 80o TOTAL Fur CHARGES EA yLQB ZQX 20 400 IMPS. 2 5 BUILDINGS 19— TOTAL MARKET VALUE OF STRUCTURES S to Adjustments: l9� A r7i3 17 i r.c'rf. l a rr s.•:aRrcce /r.vr k•'i••r --•'GN Q3/Ir elci-.F„ /Tfil/. /ygdV W4 "w"": IirtRr trrr..•.,- Trr' • • • • • • • yard Proposal Befit / Result All single family residential properties in ted in a one year time frame Current and trustworthy data Readable and understandable property data cards Computerized records that link data, sketch and digi photograph Integrated information into an effective computer syst Enhanced office efficiency and operation More accurate and equitable values Improved professional image nTu4,ard Proposal New erty Data Card Property Record Card (Working Parcel) Vanguard Apprslaab, tnc- I Data Tus, 1/180000, 9:03 AM Pap 1 P012+PIN:001 +11 -18. 428-028 Deed: 9YNDEY, TOM Appraised Map Area OSKALOOSA41 CheckwTlgs: Address: 30 PARK PLACE Contract: MM 300- 250 Route: 609-001-080 Lister/Date: FK. 02!0211999 City. CID#: $35,000 Tax Dist 888 Reviewl0ate: EK,0410111999 URSAMESIDENTIAL /R DBA: 252434 Plst Page: 11 -18H Entry Statue: Inspected wlg $310,540 Land Land Basis Front Rem Side 1 Side 2 R. Lot mpr IotaJ SF I Acres P= EFF 6ual,4,and Unit Price I Total [TopolEconlOtt-.1 SAdj b„T la Lump Sum --- 39,839.60 1 — 0191 $35.000 096 0% 0% $0 SS5,= Grand Total a9.BS9.t30 0.91 I 595.000 535.000 AM— But ldlnn Pamnirt lj.l.— Dale 5 Amount INUTC1 Recordln9 I Data I Number 1 $ Amount I Reason I Type I Appraised I B of R ST. Equalized 5/5/1999 $360,000 MM 300- 250 8/27/t998 5043: 5303, New Dwig and $35,000 1/23/1992 525,000 D049 252434 wlg $310,540 mpr IotaJ $345540 Roe. Structure t arl Finish Plumbing Addition Oarape at - coda t p1 TO R.: At . 7 4 Full Bath 1 naasan 1 of 1 Garage 1011 To Room a"'. d 0 6sdr=n. Befog Y 0 Shower Stag Bath year, 111'a 1998 Style All Brick Gm Dee4r Single-Fanify. / Damt Fm Area, et TC9el Room 1 EFA 2 w x (. (Y X V Owner Occupy Bunt Fm A—#2 Lavatory 2 EFA Year 1998 Ares (SF) 848 Yea, OLM 1998 B_1 Fin Arm e3 - -- Water Clow BIyU 1 Story Brick Yee, cum 1998 EFA 2 Fob Cone Sink Area (6F) 1,026 EFA 2 E—ter Wall. Vinyl Shower StaWTub 1 Cond:txn Normal EFF Year, 1998 EFF Year 1998 Rear Asph f. Hip Mtl St Sh Bath Phy-ow % 2% Grade 2 +10 Style 2 Story Fame 1id.,L. Fml.h Drw1 Mtl Stau Shower B.ml ISF) 1.028 Cormlti- Normal Flaarlrrg Carp / Vinyl No Bathroom NoOa 1"SF) Bead( (BF) ArOSSFrtaw 1.040 / 3,166 Non-base a Heating Fireplace Wet Bar 1 Ne.a FHA - Gas al. o r Frame Groe. 2 +10 FI—y"t w 0 Gas - Sloe, 'I Story 1 Whirlpool Bathroom 1 AC Yes Otn war (eF) Whirlpool Tub 1 0ve AC (SP) 60 Grade MULL 1.560 Pipela- r 0 No Hot Water Tank %PhWFOnuEms 2% -0%-0% Xend Fired rY1N) No No Plumbing Dare OPrp Cw4tion Normal SPeoe Meal.! 0 - -- - - _ Sewlct•B Water Onry Obsoleseana esmr siafn Pnyow'A 2% APpilancea _ . Water Only w/Sink F.V101 tta 0% Range Unit Intercom System Hot Tub Eeman G R 0% saeemard Full Oven Unit _ Intercom w/Mus'ic _Bidet 012W 0% Mo Bdm Fir 0 Dishwasher Built -In Stereo . Fbgte SerVice Sink ... _ Nora Microwave BI Staeo(SpkrsOnty' None Meer FHA - Gas Trash Compactor None Jennak None. ��'� A, Ac Yes ft system Copyright ®1997 -99 Atft None Built -In Vacuums 11 So" Vanguard Appraisals, Inc. nTu4,ard Proposal New riy Data Card PDF +PIN: 001 +1148 - 428-028 Tue, 1/18/2000, 9:03 AM Pepe 2 ad�+r 1 of 1 Deau+pci n taw Pn 101 — SingWFamiiy / Owner Occupied .am — M.WS .I Iftw " r- i act* 1. othm. MW - _ 2 Story Frame 1,140 $102,780 Add Central Air 1,040 52,670.00 52,670 #1 Porch: 1S Brick Open 55 SF $1,660 _ _$1,660.00 Basement Adjustment 55 SF $1250.00 $1,250 Deck #1: Wood Deck -Mad 928 SF $12.00 $11,136 Veneer 01: 2 Story Brick 27 LF $111.00 $2,997 Plumbing 6 WA $6,700 01 Fireplace: Gas-Side, 1 Story 1 52.400.00 52,400 Garage: Ali Brick Or X a 84.8 SF $24.031 1998 2% Building Sub Total $165,624 1.560 11998 2% 0% 0% 0% $237;918 1 of 1 In 1 Story Brick 1,026 SF $47,504 1.560 1898 29.S 0% 0% 0% $72,824 Building TOTAL Value $310,542 1 $310,1540 12 8 WD OK 8 (.028) 8 4 7 2 10 3 5 1 a 14 r,4 t6 B ZS B 12 110401 N) .. 28. Is B BRK 8 Elm] 18 FR GUAR to Fool 5 6 22 3 3 IS BRK OAR 32 0 1 11 2 � I t3ae ), 44 12 1S 8 BRK OP 12 ,a* ) 24 I 27 LF 2S -BRK- _ Photo 1 of I Sketch t.of1 Notes 1 out of 1 (up to 3 each): VERY NICE POPLAR WOODWORK WITH CHERRY STAIN FINISH. THROUGHOUT. LARGE GREAT RX IN REAR' PRICED WITH MAIN. uarTd Proposal Request roposal Returns • Four reappraisal firms were contacted: — john g. cleminshaw inc. — Manatron Sabre Appraisal Division — Cole Layer Trumble Company — Vanguard Appraisals, Inc. • Two companies declined to submit proposals at this ti — john g. cleminshaw inc. — Manatron Sabre Appraisal Division • Two companies did submit proposals: — Cole Layer Trumble Company — Vanguard Appraisals, Inc. Vang d Appraisals, Inc. ection • Vanguard Appraisals, Inc. — Reputation for professional and defensible. — Responsive service and technical support s — Strong people skills — Follow schedules and meet deadlines VA — Specialize in field data collection and appraisal revi� — Knowledge of mid -west with mass appraisal project management — Endorsed by all users we interviewed — Recognized by International Association of Assessing Officers MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY HELD AT CITY HALL JULY 5, 2000 - 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly and Chair Maetzold. CONSENT AGENDA APPROVED Motion made by seconded by Commissioner Hovland approving Redevelopment Authority Agenda as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold Motion carried. Commissioner Faust and the Edina Housing and *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FOR JUNE 20, 2000 APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Faust and seconded by Commissioner Hovland approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority for June 20, 2000. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED TO AUGUST 15, 2000, FOR BUSINESS SUBSIDY CRITERIA Motion made by Commissioner Faust and seconded by Commissioner Hovland to continue the Business Subsidy Criteria public hearing until August 15, 2000. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. CLAIMS PAID Motion made by Commissioner Hovland approving the Check Register dated June 28, 2000, and consisting of one page totaling $33,800.19. Commissioner Johnson seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold Motion carried. There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, Chair Maetzold declared the meeting adjourned. Executive Director COUNCIL CHECK h_..lSTER 12 -JUL -2000 (Pl.ZB) page 1 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 13560 07/18/00 $920.50 BRAUN INTERTEC CONSTR. TESTING SERVI 190293 CENTENNIAL LAK PARKS < *> $920.50* 13561 07/18/00 $431.31 BRW INC. ARCHITECT FEES 267 -0932 CENTENNIAL LAK PRO FEE ARCH /E 07/18/00 $12,039.12 BRW INC. ARCHITECT FEES 267 -0932 CENTENNIAL LAK PRO FEE ARCH /E 07/18/00 $4,362.89 BRW INC. ARCHITECT FEES 515 -0024 CENTENNIAL LAK PRO FEE ARCH /E < *> $16,833.32* 13562 07/18/00 $304,712.09 KNUTSON CONSTRUCTION SER PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 071800 50TH STREET PRO FEE ARCH /E < *> $304,712.09* 13563 07/18/00 $17,652.18 THOMAS & SONS CONSTRUCTI PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3 071800 CENTENNIAL LAK PARKS < *> $17,652.18* 13564 07/18/00 $387,658.54 THOMAS & SONS CONSTRUCTI PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 6 07/18 CENTENNIAL LAK PARKS < *> $387,658.54* $727,776.63* COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY 12 -JUL -2000 (15:32) page 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ FUND # 01 HOUSING & REDEVELOP AUTHOR $727,776.63 $727,776.63* - MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JULY 5, 2000 - 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, and Mayor. Maetzold. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Faust and seconded by Member Hovland approving the Council Consent Agenda as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland Johnson, Kelly, and Maetzold Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF TUNE 20, 2000, APPROVED Motion made by Member Faust and seconded by Member Hovland approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of June 20, 2000. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *RESOLUTION NO. 2000 -67 ADOPTED APPROVING FINAL PLAT - DOEPKES DIVISION (5912 & 5920 WEST 70TH STREET) Member Faust introduced and Member Hovland seconded the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2000-67 GRANTING FINAL PLAT APPROVAL TO DOEPKES DIVISION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled, "DOEPKES DIVISION ", platted by R.E.C. Inc. a Minnesota Corporation, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council on July 5, 2000, be and is hereby granted final plat approval with two conditions: 1. Subdivision Dedication of $14,000 based upon unimproved land Value of $175,000; and 2. Payment of Utility Connection Charges. Passed this 51h day of July, 2000. Resolution adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 2000 -66, FINAL REZONING AND FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR OPUS /CLARK (GRANDVIEW SQUARE) CONTINUED FROM TUNE 20, 2000 Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Presentation by Planner Planner Larsen explained that after Council had granted preliminary approval to the Grandview Square project at its May 16, 2000, meeting the developers went before the Planning Commission May 31, 2000, and received unanimous approval of the final design. He added the final proposal is essentially the same containing the 4 -story office building of 88,170 square feet, 172 residential units and a 40,000 square foot senior center and library building. He added the plan also provided a public park in the center of the development. Currently, the developers are seeking final rezoning, final site plan for Phase One (the office building, 71 condominium units and the Page 1 Minutes/Edina Citv Council /iuly 5, 2000 central park) and preliminary plat approval of Grandview Square. He added that Phase Two included the library- senior center, while Phases Three and Four would contain the remaining condominium units. He added the plans submitted were consistent with those approved by the Council at preliminary approval, and he reported the Planning Commission recommended approval of the aforementioned actions conditioned upon: 1) Final Plat approval; 2) Developers Agreement; 3) HRA /Development Agreement, and 4) Watershed District Permits. Mr. Larsen added that Phase One would begin construction by September with Phase Two beginning in the spring of 2001. Phases Three and Four would be built as soon as the market allowed. Jack Buxell, Architect, ,representing Ron Clark reviewed the proposed condominiums and explained the changes to the exterior of the buildings. Mr. Buxell stated the exteriors would be a hand molded dark brick incorporating both stucco and wrought iron. In addition, the building's mechanical equipment will be hidden on the roof by a shingled screen wall. Member Faust asked the price range of the condominiums. Mr. Buxell replied they would range from $200,000 to about $280,000. The lowest price unit would be a smaller two - bedroom unit. He said the average unit would be at least 1,600 square feet and include as standard features a gas fire place, two underground garage spaces, access to a party room, guest room, and exercise facility. Member Hovland asked why the choice of brick was made, and if accommodations had been made for washing bays or storage units. He also wanted to know if the office and condominiums had been designed compatibly, and who would be responsible for the Central Park design. Mr. Buxell said each unit would have a storage module, of about six by six feet. He added that Opus had decided quite early to use brick on the. office building's exterior, so moving the condos to. a hand molded brick helps keep that feel in the development. Brick is also a less costly and more predictable building component. Mr. Buxell said that the developers would ensure the development has the "Old World" feel, while each component maintains its individuality. The Edina Park Department will be consulted regarding the Central Park design. Member Kelly asked how much guest parking the condominiums would have. Mr. Buxell answered that one -half stall had been allowed for each unit, noting that the library /senior center would most likely be available if there were a larger party or on holidays. Mayor Maetzold asked what the demographics of the potential buyers were. Mr. Buxell replied that potential buyers are 1) young professionals who want maintenance free living, or 2) mature owners moving to a maintenance free life style, or 3) young elderly who are gone for extended periods and also do not want any maintenance. Brian Borchert of Opus explained he was an assistant in the office building and library /senior center designs. Mr. Borchert explained the library /senior center design was in its infancy, but that the office building was ready for production. Member Faust asked how the office building would compliment the condominiums and whether any space in the office had been rented. Mr. Borchert showed a graphic depiction of the office design pointing out features that tie, the development together, such as hand molded brick, shingled screen wall on top of building, and the overall exterior finish. Mr. Borchert said the Page 2 Minutes/Edina City Council/iuly 5, 2000 office has not yet been rented, but Opus currently plans multiple tenants per floor, not just one large user. Mayor Maetzold asked staff to clarify the difference between preliminary and final approval. Mr. Larsen explained that before preliminary approval is granted, a development is reviewed to ensure compliance with various aspects of the Code, i.e. density, uses, setbacks, etc. and places any conditions the City views as necessary on the approval. However, the final approval looks to seek that the conditions have been met and that the proposed development is consistent with that granted preliminary approval. Public Comment John Menke, 5301 Pinewood Drive said he knew the Council had received his May 19, 2000, letter with its attachment. He added that other citizens would also present two petitions. Mr. Menke added the neighbors were still very concerned about the height of the buildings and the use of Sherwood Park. He expressed his vehement opposition to the development as proposed and urged the Council to re- advertise for proposals. Mr. Menke asked the Council to turn down the re- zoning. He also questioned whether Member Kelly had a conflict of interest. Art Heiam, 5205 Richwood Drive, stated the neighbors were not opposed to the site being developed, but were opposed to the particular development as proposed. Mr. Heiam used .a graphic depiction of the park as it exists today and as it will look next to a 55 -foot building. He presented petitions protesting the business condemnation and the development. Mr. Heiam expressed concerns about traffic, the usage of the park and the building height. Diana Lamb, Classic Hair Design, said she did not feel the City had treated the area business correctly. Ms. Lamb questioned whether Edina operated as a democracy. Allison Ullom, 5229 Richwood Drive, stated she had been consistently disappointed with the City's handling, of the development of the Grandview Square site. She urged the Council to not proceed with the development. Dr. Dan Shebuski, Edina Pet Hospital, 5237 Eden Avenue, said he had been in business since 1974. Dr. Shebuski said he has seen traffic and buses combine to create terrible problems in the area. He pointed the dangerous situation created by the Edina School Bus Garage. Dr. Shebuski said in his opinion he had not been dealt with fairly. He said no one had ever asked him what needs his business had relative to re- locating: Dr. Shebuski said that making him move his business would make him lose it. Dan Biersdorf, 5040 Juanita Avenue, explained' he was a trial attorney retained by the local residents. Mr. Biersdorf referred to what he termed the "potential conflict of interest issue'. of Member Kelly. He added that there appears to be legal issues and he has advised the residents that there is a legal path open to them. Mr. Biersdorf urged the Council to be sure of the plan before making any further approvals. Jack Abrahamson, 5209 Richwood Drive, acknowledged that Mayor Maetzold informed the residents the plan had already been granted preliminary approval, but pointed out he felt the Council could if. they so chose appease 90% of the affected neighbors. Page 3 Minutes/Edina ON Council/iuly 5, 2000 Joan Lonsbury, Senior Center representative, thanked the Council for all they have done so far. She expressed the support of the Edina Senior Center and added their members were looking forward to working with the City as the project moves forward. Ms. Lonsbury told the Council they were doing the right thing and urged them to continue. Shirley Kiedrowski, Classic Hair Design, said she did not understand why small business cannot be left alone to act as a buffer between the neighborhood and new development. She added that initially, her business had not been involved with the project. Mayor Maetzold explained the decision had been made last fall to increase the project's size. Steve Ullom, 5229 Richwood Drive, expressed his extreme disappointment that the Council had approved the proposal this far. He said he felt many questions still exist such as the number of tenants. Mr. Ullom added that he did not think an adequate traffic study had been preformed. In addition, Mr. Ullom alluded to duplicity on the part of the developer. He also referred to Member Kelly as having a conflict of interest. Mr. Ullom asked the Council not to approve the final rezoning. He asked how long it would take for the multiple family housing to be completed and expressed concern that it could take five or more years. Council Discussion Mayor Maetzold asked Attorney Gilligan to comment on Member Kelly's "potential conflict ". Attorney Gilligan said the statute deals with direct financial issues. He said Mr. Kelly did disclose the issue and it was checked on, but no conflict existed because Mr. Kelly would not gain financially from the project. Further, Mr. Gilligan explained that even if Member Kelly was still at the same firm, since he was not directly involved with the developer, no conflict existed. Member Kelly reiterated that he had made the disclosure at the appropriate time. He noted that multiple finalists had been clients of his firm. Member Kelly added that after nine years of real finalists estate practice he knew all of the either through business or personally. He repeated the proper disclosure had been made at the proper time and no conflict had been found. Member Kelly complimented the developer on the quality of the proposal and said he looked forward to seeing the library and senior center become a reality. Member Faust noted the Council had been reviewing redevelopment of this property ever since she was elected. She reminded the neighbors that the area had once been home to factories with large trucks coming in and moving through the area. Member Faust stated she felt the proposed development was in the best interest of the City. Member Hovland acknowledged that the change in Sherwood Park would have been nice to avoid, but noted it came about because the library needed to be one level with greater visibility. He reminded that it was the Council's charge to look after the best interest of the entire city, not just one neighborhood. Member Hovland added the Council was working diligently to ensure that the business owners who must move are treated fairly. Member Johnson stated he has been very impressed with the citizen involvement. He also acknowledged that sometime when the Council looks after the best interest , of the entire community there is a neighborhood, impact. Member Johnson said, in his opinion, the developers had made very conscientious efforts to modify the plans and presented a well thought out viable project. He added the area business owners would be treated fairly under Minnesota Statutes. Page 4 Minutes/Edina City Council/Tuly 5, 2000 Mayor Maetzold noted he had been in the minority when the preliminary approval was granted, but he supported the Council's decision. Last fall the Council looked at a smaller project, but the Council as a whole has voted for the existing proposal and he therefore supported their vote. Last month again the entire Council made a decision that the Mayor supported. Mayor Maetzold said that when the project was completed it will be a fine development and bring much value to the neighborhood. Member Faust made a motion closing the public hearing. Member Johnson seconded the motion. Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold. Motion carried. Mayor Maetzold made a motion granting second reading to the following ordinance: ORDINANCE NO. 850-A18 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 850) BY REZONING PROPERTY FROM SINGLE DWELLING UNIT DISTRICT R -1 TO MIXED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT 4 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Subsection 850.06 of Section 850 of the Edina City Code is amended by adding the following thereto: "The extent of the Mixed Development (MDD -4) District R -1, is enlarged by the addition of the following property: The extent of the Single Dwelling Unit District (R -1) is reduced by removing the property described in Tract A and Tract B below:" TRACT A: Lot 2, Block 1, WANNER ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota, subject to an easement for roadway purposes over and across the South 25 feet of said Lot 2, and together with an easement for roadway purposes over and across. the North 25 feet of Lot 3, Block 1, of said WANNER ADDITION; also together with an easement for road purposes over a strip of land 16 feet in width, being 8 feet on each side of the following described line: Commencing at a point on the south line of Eden Prairie Road 358 feet due East from the West line of said Government Lot 8; thence South and parallel with the west line of said Government Lot 8 to a point which is 612.9 feet North of the South line of said Lot 8; thence West at right angles to east line of premises first above described. And That part of Lot 1, Block 1 of said WANNER ADDITION described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of said Lot 1; thence North along the East line of said Lot 1 a distance of 23.4 feet; thence West parallel with the South line of said Lot 1 a distance of 101 feet; thence South parallel with the East line of said Lot 1, a distance of 22.4 feet; thence West parallel with the South line of said Lot 1 to the West line of said Lot 1; thence South along the West line of said Lot 1 a distance of 1 foot to the Southwest corner of said Lot 1; thence East along the South line of said Lot 1 to the point of beginning. Page 5 Minutes/Edina City Council/Tuly 5, 2000 And That part of Government Lot 8, Section 28, Township 117 North, Range 21 West, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Beginning at a point located on a line drawn between the following described points: Point one located on a line parallel with and distant 221.8 feet east of the west line of said Government Lot 8, which point is distant south 259.4 feet from the intersection of the centerline of Eden Prairie Road and said line; and point two located on the south line of said Government Lot 8, 246.8 feet East of the southwest corner of said Government Lot 8, said point of beginning being 647.9 feet from the south line of said Government Lot 8; thence northerly along said drawn line 25 feet; thence easterly at right angles a distance of 90 feet, thence southerly and parallel with said drawn line 25 feet; thence westerly and at right angles to point of beginning. TRACT B: Parcel 1: That part of Lot 1, Block 1, "EDENMOOR, Hennepin County, Minnesota ", lying North of the South 6 feet of said Lot 1. Parcel 2: That part of Lot 1, Block 1, WANNER ADDITION, lying northerly of a line described as beginning at a point on the East line of said Lot 1, distant 23.4 feet Northerly from the Southeast corner of said Lot 1; thence Westerly parallel with the South line of said Lot 1 a distance of 101 feet; thence Southerly parallel with the East line of Lot 1 a distance of 22.4 feet; thence Westerly parallel with said South line of Lot 1 to the West line of said Lot 1 and there terminating. Parcel 3• That , part of Government Lot 8, Section 28, Township 117, Range 21, lying Southerly of the Southerly right -of -way line of Eden Avenue and Westerly of the Westerly right -of -way line of the Soo Line Railroad Company, formerly the Minneapolis, Northfield and Southern Railway, which lies Easterly of a line described as beginning at the intersection of the South line of said Government Lot 8 with the East line of Block 1, WANNER ADDITION; thence Northerly and Easterly along said East line to the most Easterly line of said Block 1; thence Northerly along said most Easterly line and its Northerly extension to a point 25 feet Northerly from the Northeast corner of Lot 2, in said Block 1; thence Westerly parallel with the North line of said Lot 2 to the East line of Lot 1, in said Block 1; thence Northerly along said East line of Lot 1 and its Northerly extension to said Southerly right -of -way line of Eden Avenue and there terminating. Section 2. Subsection 850.06 of Section 850 of the Edina City Code is amended by adding the following thereto: "The extent of the Mixed Development District (MDD4), is enlarged by the addition of the following property. The extent of the Planned Industrial District (PID)is reduced by removing the property described in Tract C as follows: TRACT C: Page 6 Minutes/Edina City CounciV[uly 5, 2000 Lot 3, Block 1, WANNER ADDITION, together with an easement over and across the south 25 feet of Lot 2, Block 1, WANNER ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota" Section 3. Subsection 850.06 of Section 850 of the Edina City Code is amended by adding the following thereto: "The extent of the Mixed Development District (MDD4), is enlarged by the addition of the following property. The extent of the Planned Office District (POD -1) is reduced by removing the property described in Tract D as follows: TRACT D: All of Lot 7, Block 1, and that part of Lots 5 and 6, Block 1, EDENMOOR, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying North and East of the Northerly line of Eden Circle (formerly known as Downing Street) as described in Document No. 3164311; Also, the Southerly six feet of Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, EDENMOOR, Hennepin County, Minnesota." Section 4. Subsection 850.06 of Section 850 of the Edina City Code is amended by adding the following thereto: "The extent of the Mixed Development District (MDD -4), is enlarged by the addition of the following property. The extent of the Planned Commercial District (PCD -2) is reduced by removing the property described in Tract E and F as follows: TRACT E: Lot 2, Block 1, EDENMOOR, Hennepin County, Minnesota, except the south six feet thereof, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. TRACT F: Lot 3, Block 1, EDENMOOR, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota." Section 5. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage and publication. Attest City Clerk Mayor Member Hovland seconded the motion. Adopted this 5th day of July, 2000. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold Resolution adopted. Mayor Maetzold made a motion introducing the following resolution and moving its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2000-66 FINAL SITE PLAN, PHASE ONE Page 7 Minutes/Edina City Council/Tuly 5, 2000 PRELIMINARY PLAT - GRANDVIEW SQUARE BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that the Final Development Plan of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority, a Minnesota corporation, and Eden Circle Limited Partnership, a Minnesota Limited Liability Company presented at a regular meeting of the City Council held July 5, 2000, is hereby granted Final Development Plan approval with the following condition: as stated below. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled, "GRANDVIEW SQUARE ", platted by the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority and Eden Circle Limited Partnership, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council on July 5, 2000, be and is hereby granted preliminary plat approval with the following conditions: 1. Final Plat Approval; 2. Developer's Agreement 3. Development Agreement with Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority; and 4. Watershed District Permits. Adopted this 51h day of July, 2000. Member Hovland seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly Maetzold Resolution adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 2000 -7 ADOPTED PROVIDING TECHNICAL CHANGES TO EDINA'S CODE OF ORDINANCES Manager Hughes explained that staff periodically reviews the City's code and makes recommendations to keep it current or to correct technical problems. Member Faust made a motion closing the hearing. Member Faust seconded the motion Member Johnson made a motion granting first reading including waiver of second reading for Ordinance No. 2000 -7 as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 2000 - 7 AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS TO THE EDINA CITY CODE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Subsection 165.05 shall be amended to read as follows: "165.03 Bond or Letter of Credit. Unless prohibited by State Law, (i) every applicant for a license registration pursuant to Subsection 165.01, and (ii) every applicant for a license pursuant to Section 430 of this Code, shall file with such registration or license application a surety bond that is valid and in force and effect in the sum of at least $25,000.00 and which complies with the provisions of Subsection 160.03 of this Code. At the option of the applicant, a letter of credit for at least $25,000.00 may be used in lieu of a bond. The letter of credit shall be irrevocable and unconditional, issued by a national or state bank with its main office located in the Minneapolis -St. Paul metropolitan area, and otherwise shall be on terms approved by the Manager. The bond or letter of credit shall be conditioned that the applicant, as to all material and equipment furnished by the applicant, and as to all business carried on or all work done, commenced or performed by the applicant during the term of the license registration shall:" Section 2.. Subsection 300.17 Subd. 6 C. shall be amended to read as follows: Page 8 Minutes/Edina City Council/July 5, 2000 "C. The Police Chief may declare a dangerous dog under M..S. 347. Said declaration may be appealed to the City Council for a public hearing." Section 3. Subsection 300.17 Subd. 6 shall be amended by adding subparagraph D. as follows: "D. Appeals of Administrative Decisions. A person who deems himself or. herself aggrieved by an alleged error in any order, requirement, decision or determination made by an administrative officer in the interpretation and enforcement of this Section, may appeal to the City Council by filing a written appeal with the City Clerk within 10 days after the date of such order, requirement, decision or- determination. The appeal shall fully state the order to be appealed and the relevant facts of the matter. 1. The City Council shall hear such appeal within 30 days of receipt. Mailed notice of such hearing shall be given at least ten days prior tot he date of the hearing to the owner of the dog and to the owners of all property within 250 feet of the property where such dog is usually kept. The Council shall make its decision at such hearing or any continuation thereof." Section 4. Subsection 440.03 Subd. 2. Subpagraph B. shall be amended to read as follows: "B. Water service. and building sewer lines may be installed by persons who complete the training for and earn a Pipe Layer Card, their assistants and contractors who employ them so long as there is at least one cardholder in each trench where work is proceeding, providing they are duly registered and licensed under Section 430 of this Code. ". Section 5. Section 455.02 Subd.1 shall be amended to read as follows: "Subd.1 Materials. All public bathrooms shall be constructed of materials which are impervious to moisture, bacteria, mold or fungus growth. The floor to wall joints shall be constructed to provide a sanitary cove with a minimum radius of 3/8 in The entire floor shall be ceramic tile. All wall surfaces within 24 inches of a water closet or urinal shall be ceramic tile to a height of 48 inches." Section 6. Subsection 605.08 shall be amended by adding the following subdivision 7. "Subd. 7. Marking of Curbs along Fire Lanes. Although painting fire lanes is not required, when the property owner paints the curbs of .fire lanes they shall be painted RED." Section 7. Subsection 615.05 shall be amended to read as follows: "615.05 Signature Required. Immediately after servicing of a fire extinguisher, the licensee shall affix a tag or decal to such fire extinguisher which contains a number, the name of the company providing the service, the name of the licenses, the date of service, and the signature of the individual who serviced the fire extinguisher." Section 8. Subsection 850.07 Subd. 12 B. shall be amended to read as follows: "B. No property used for residential purposes shall be used for garage sales, estate sales or other sales of personal property for more than one period of 72 consecutive hours in any calendar year. The property offered for sale shall consist only of items owned by the resident or of the premises or by friends of such resident. None of the items offered for sale shall have been purchased for resale or received on consignment for purposes of resale." Section 9. Subsection 1400.16 shall be amended by deleting Subd. 4 Use or Sale of Certain Radio Equipment and renumbering Subd. 5 Traffic Diverters to read Subd. 4 Traffic Diverters. Section 10. Subsection 1400.18 Subd.2 B. shall be amended to read as follows: Page 9 Minutes/Edina City Council/luly 5, 2000 "B. Parking spaces hereafter designated and reserved for physically disabled persons shall comply with Minnesota State Building Code Chapter 1341.0428." Section 11. Effective Date: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon adoption and publication according to law. Attest City Clerk Mayor Member Hovland seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly Maetzold Ordinance adopted. *BID AWARDED FOR INSURANCE RENEWAL; EQUIPMENT, PUBLIC OFFICIALS, POLICE PROFESSIONAL, AUTO, GENERAL - LIABILITY (INCLUDING LIQUOR AND EMPLOYEE BENEFIT) AND WORKERS' COMPENSATION Motion made by Member Faust and seconded by Member Hovland for award of bid for insurance renewals for policy period July 1, 2000 to July 1, 2001 for equipment, public officials liability, police professional, auto, general liability (including liquor and employee benefit liability) and workers' compensation insurance to sole bidder, St. Paul Companies at $488,104.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR PROPERTY INSURANCE RENEWAL Motion made by Member Faust and seconded by Member Hovland for award of bid for property insurance for policy period July 1, 2000 to July 1, 2001 to recommended second bidder, Travelers Insurance at $50,773.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. EMERGENCY REPAIRS ON THE 51sT STREET RAMP AUTHORIZED Engineer Hoffman explained a fire had occurred at the 51St Street ramp during the restoration project. Construction materials were ignited and considerable smoke damage was done to the ramp. Mr. Hoffman added that some concrete was damaged and will need to be replaced. He explained the City's insurance will pay for all costs except the $5,000.00 deductible. Mr. Hoffman stated the initial clean up was completed by Lindstrom Cleaning and Construction Inc. for approximate $68,881.20. The City obtained an alternate estimate of $99,341.97 from Giersten Company. Mr. Hoffman recommended approval of the emergency purchase of services to Lindstrom at $68,881.20. He noted that representatives from the Travelers Insurance Company have worked with staff to process the claim. Following a brief discussion Member Hovland made a motion authorizing the emergency purchase of services from Lindstrom Cleaning and Construction, Inc. at $68,881.20 for the repair of Edina's West 51St Street Parking Ramps. Member Faust seconded the motion. Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold Motion carried. STAFF DIRECTED TO CONTINUE NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE COUNTY ON GLEASON ROAD/VERNON AVENUE TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION Engineer Hoffman reminded the Council the Vernon /Gleason signal project was approved in February 2000. A feasibility Page 10 Minutes/Edina City Council/iuly 5, 2000 study was completed on the project and upon review, noted that the projected completion would be 2000 or, 2001. City staff has made some progress with Hennepin County concerning this installation. The proposed location of the signal does not meet County requirements but the County is willing to negotiate a solution to the issue with a tie -in to roadway jurisdiction or joint maintenance. City and County staffs have met and discussions have involved funding, maintenance costs, jurisdiction and overall need on a regional basis. Currently, the issue is in the County Engineer's office for consideration. No Council action was taken. *LINDA PRESTHUS RE- APPOINTED TO COMMUNITY EDUCATION SERVICES BOARD Motion made by Member Faust and seconded by Member Hovland appointing Linda Presthus to a one year term ending June 30, 2001 on the Edina Community Education Services Board. Motion carried on rollcall vote five ayes. VAN VALKENBURG WATER TOWER ANTENNA APPROVED - VERIZON WIRELESS Assistant Manager Anderson explained that last November, the Council approved the co- location of telecommunication antennas on the Van Valkenburg water tower by Sprint Spectrum. Mr. Anderson reported the lease had been approved, site plans reviewed and a building permit issued. However, before the installation, Verizon Wireless asked Sprint to move their antennas a few feet higher on the stem of the tower allowing Verizon to co- locate with Sprint. Sprint agreed to move their antennas and Verizon presented the proposal to locate between 6 and 12' panel antennas on the stem of the Van Valkenburg water tower. Mr. Anderson briefly reviewed the lease terms, diagrams of the proposed installation and photographs of multiple tenant water tower installations in other cities. He noted that the preliminary plans have been reviewed by Public Works and they do not object to the placement of the antennas, subject to the stem installation. Public Works will require removal of the antennas when the tower is repainted. As with the Sprint installation, S.E.H. (the City's consultant) will perform the structural review and installation oversight. An interference specialist will be hired to make sure the proposed installation does not interfere with our public safety radio system and existing tenants on the tower. Verizon will pay for these consultants' costs. Following a brief Council discussion, Member Johnson made a motion approving the project concept for Verizon Wireless for the Van Valkenburg Water Tower, and to instruct staff to develop a lease with Verizon Wireless. Member Hovland seconded the motion. Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold Motion carried. COMMUNITY CENTER WATER TOWER ANTENNA APPROVED - VERIZON WIRELESS Assistant Manager Anderson reported that staff has. been working with Verizon Wireless to also locate some telecommunications antennas on the Community Center water tower. After meetings with staff concerning the requirements for locating on the tower, Verizon has put together a proposal for Council to review. The proposal would place 6 -12 antennas (3 groups of 2-4 antennas) on the cross - braces between the legs of the water tower. They would place a 12 x 20 Page 11 Minutes/Edina City Council/Tuly 5, 2000 foot equipment shelter to the south of our existing buildings on the tower compound. The exterior of the building would match the two buildings on the site. Staff will have a presentation discussing lease terms, diagrams of the proposed installation and photographs of the existing site. Public Works has reviewed -the preliminary plans and does not object to the placement of the antennas. They do not want any installations that place antennas on the water containment portion of the tower. Verizon will not be required to remove the antennas during the painting process, but will be required to pay any additional painting and maintenance cost due to the antennas being on the tower. Similar to the Van Valkenburg water tower installation, the City will hire a consultant for structural review and installation oversight. An interference specialist will also be hired to make sure the proposed installation does not interfere with our public safety radio system. Both of these consultants' costs will be paid for by Verizon. Following a brief Council discussion, Member Hovland made a motion approving the project concept for Verizon Wireless for the Community Center Tower and to instruct staff to develop a lease with Verizon Wireless. Member Kelly seconded the motion. Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold Motion carried. *RESOLUTION NO. 2000 -68 ADOPTED AUTHORIZING ASSESSING CONNECTION CHANGES AT OWNERS REQUEST Motion of Member Faust seconded by Member Hovland introducing the following resolution and moving its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2000-68 AUTHORIZING CONNECTION CHARGES BE SPECIALLY ASSESSED AS REQUESTED BY PROPERTY OWNER WHEREAS, Rocco & Angela Fabio, 4908 West 69th Street has requested installment payments of connection charges for Lot 3, Block 2, Smiley Second Addition, Property Identification 30- 028 -24-33 =0098 in Edina; and WHEREAS, the connection charges are for access to sewer and water in the amount of $1,554.91; and WHEREAS, the assessment to be certified for collection would be $425.82 plus interest for the year 2001 through 2006, and WHEREAS, Edina Code Section 1105.02, Subd. 3B allows a property owner to request the Council to make connection charges payable by installment; and WHEREAS, the Council may, by resolution, provide the connection charges be spread over a term of up to six years; and WHEREAS, the unpaid balance shall bear interest at the rate charged by the City on special assessments and the amount certified to the County Auditor for collection with interest in the same manner as other special assessments and shall become a lien upon the property until paid. NOW, THEREFORE, the Council authorizes the connection charges be specially assessed as requested by the property owner at 4908 West 69th Street. Adopted this 5th day of July, 2000. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. Page 12 Minutes/Edina City Council/iuly 5; 2000 RESOLUTION NO 2000 -70, SETTING HEARING DATE OF AUGUST 15, 2000, FOR HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE SUBDISTRICT - GRANDVIEW Manager Hughes said it has been proposed that the Edina HRA create a Hazardous Substance Subdistrict within the Grandview Tax Increment Financing District to finance the removal and remediation of pollution and hazardous substances in connection with the Grandview Square project. A Hazardous Substance Subdistrict operates in effect as a separate tax increment finance district within an overlying tax increment district. All of the parcels to be redeveloped as part of the Grandview Square project are proposed to be included in the Hazardous Substance Subdistrict. Mr. Hughes explained that creating this Subdistrict permits the HRA to generate additional tax increment from the Grandview Tax Increment Financing District. The additional increment is to be used solely for removal and remediation costs, pollution testing and related administrative and legal costs. The additional tax increment is generated as a result of the base value of the parcels to be included in the Hazardous Substance Subdistrict being reduced by the estimated costs of removal and remediation actions specified in the development action response plan approved by the MPCA to an amount not less than zero. Taxes previously levied against this base value were shared by the taxing jurisdictions and were not included in the tax increment received by the Grandview. Tax Increment Financing District. A Hazardous Substance Subdistrict may stay in existence for up to 25 years from the date of first receipt of the tax increment from the subdistrict. The subdistrict may survive the earlier termination of the overlying tax increment financing district. Following the termination of the overlying tax increment financing district, the HRA will continue to receive the tax increment from the subdistrict, but will no longer receive the tax increment generated by the overlying tax increment financing district The process for creation of a Hazardous Substance Subdistrict is the same as the process for creation of the overlying tax increment financing district A public hearing is required to be held by the City Council on the proposed subdistrict and at least 30 days prior to the public hearing a draft of the. proposed tax increment financing plan and estimated fiscal and economic implications of the subdistrict must be provided to the County and School District. The subdistrict may not be certified by the County until the MPCA has approved the development response action plan for the subdistrict Mr. Hughes said staff suggests as a first step in creation of the Hazardous Substance Subdistrict is approval of setting a public hearing for August 15, 2000. Motion of Member Kelly and seconded by Member Johnson introducing the following resolution and moving its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2000-70 CALLING A PUBLIC HEARING ON AMENDMENTS TO GRANDVIEW TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota as follows: 1. The Commissioners of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (the "HRA ") and the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "City "), have previously approved the Grandview Area Redevelopment Plan (the "Redevelopment Plan ") and Grandview Redevelopment Project No. 1 (the "Redevelopment Project ") to be undertaken pursuant thereto, and in order to finance the public redevelopment costs to be incurred by the City and the HRA in connection with the Redevelopment Plan and Redevelopment Project, the HRA Page 13 Minutes/Edina City Council/Tuly 5, 2000 and the City have approved Grandview Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "Financing Plan "), which establishes a tax increment financing district which is designated by the HRA as the Grandview Tax Increment Financing District (Hennepin County No. 1202). It has been proposed that the City and HRA approve amendments to the Financing Plan. . 2. A public hearing on the amendments to the Financing Plan is hereby called and shall be held on August 15, 2000, at 7:00 o'clock p.m. in the City Council Chambers at Edina City Hall. The City Clerk shall cause notice of the public hearing to be published in the Edina Sun Current, the official newspaper of the City and a newspaper of general circulation in the City at least once not less than ten (10) days or more than thirty (30) days prior to the date fixed for the public hearing. Passed by the Council this 5th day of July, 2000. Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold Motion carried: APPOINTMENT, OF PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES REFERENDUM "BLUE RIBBON" COMMITTEE Mayor Maetzold presented a list of nine persons interested in serving on a "Blue Ribbon" Committee charged with studying plans to improve recreational facilities in the City. Mayor Maetzold explained that the Council had voted in late May to form a "Blue Ribbon" committee, to study the location of the fieldhouse and other elements of the proposed project before moving forward with a referendum. Member Kelly made a motion appointing the Blue Ribbon Referendum Committee as follows: CHAIRMAN, Bob Christianson; PARK BOARD MEMBERS, Chuck Mooty and Linda Presthus; DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY EDUCATION SERVICES, Doug Johnson, NORMANDALE FRENCH IMMERSION SCHOOL SITE COUNCIL CHAIRWOMAN, Kris Hayes; PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBER, Ann Swenson; AT -LARGE REPRESENTATIVES, Jeff Bohlig, Mary Brindle and Jim Van Valkenburg; directing staff to confirm the last members and to draft the committee's charge for review at the next meeting. Member Johnson seconded the motion. Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold Motion carried. Ray Fesenmaier 5713 Concord Avenue, asked to be considered for appointment to the committee. Kathy Christiansen asked that Lenny Wallen - Friedman be considered for appointment to the Committee. She said that including only representatives from the Site Council did not encompass all viewpoints of the Normandale parents. *RESOLUTION NO. 2000 -69 ADOPTED AUTHORIZING I494 CORRIDOR COMMISSION TO ENTER INTO A TRAFFIC STUDY REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE Motion of Member Faust, seconded by Member Hovland introducing the following resolution and moving its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2000-69 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENTS. WHEREAS, the City is a party to that certain Joint and Cooperative Agreement establishing the I494 Corridor Commission; Page 14 Minutes/Edina City Council/Tuly 5, 2000 WHEREAS, Article 6, Paragraph 6.12 authorizes the Commission to enter into contracts deemed necessary by the Commission to carry out its. powers and duties, except that ,all contracts for an amount exceeding $5,000 shall be approved by at least five Parties; WHEREAS, the Commission desires to enter into a Traffic Study Reimbursement. Agreement with the City of Eden Prairie pertaining to a traffic study for the Eden Prairie Golden Triangle Area, and a Golden Triangle Reimbursement Agreement with the City of Eden Prairie whereby the City would hire on behalf of the Commission an Executive Director for the Golden Triangle Transportation Management Association; and WHEREAS, it is anticipated that both Agreements will exceed $5,000 in cost. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA THAT the City hereby authorizes the Commission to enter into those certain agreements entitled Traffic Study Reimbursement Agreement and Golden Triangle Reimbursement Agreement both by and between the City of Eden Prairie and the I-494 Corridor Commission. ADOPTED by the City Council this 5th day of July, 2000. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *PETITION RECEIVED REQUESTING STREET LIGHT_ INSTALLATION FOR 5204 -5213 RICHWOOD DRIVE Motion made by Member Faust and seconded by Member Hovland acknowledging receipt of the petition request for street light installation for 5204 -5213 Richwood Drive and submitted to the engineering department for feasibility. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. POTENTIAL WINE SERVICE AT BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE The Council briefly discussed the potential of serving wine at the Braemar Golf Course Club House. Staff was directed to research the issue, discuss it with the Park Board and bring it back to the Council for consideration at a later date. COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT (CAFR) RECEIVED FOR YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 1999 Manager Hughes explained that the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report was the accumulation of all Finance functions compiled in a format prescribed by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the Governmental Accounting Standards Board, the State of Minnesota and the Federal Government. Following a brief Council discussion, Member Johnson made a motion accepting the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) for year ending December 31, 1999, as presented. Member Kelly seconded the motion. Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold Motion carried. *BOND SALE SCHEDULED FOR TULY 12, 2000, POSTPONED Motion made by Member Faust and seconded by Member Hovland postponing the refunding of the 1997 temporary bonds and a new issue to partially fund the construction of the senior center/library building proposed at Grandview Square for July 12, 2000, until a date uncertain in August. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. CLAIMS PAID Motion made by Member Faust approving payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated June 28, 2000, and consisting of 32 pages: General Fund $102,837.64; Communications $356.56; Working Capital $3,768.25; Art Center $16,430.86, Page 15 Minutes/Edina City Council/iuly 5, 2000 Swimming Pool Fund $17,046.88; Golf Course Fund $64,992.23; Ice Arena Fund $3,945.18; Edinborough/Centennial Lakes $12,223.81; Utility Fund $245,547.22, Storm Sewer Utility Fund $355.00; Liquor Dispensary Fund $307,364.62; Construction Fund $34,270.49; TOTAL $809,138.74. Member Kelly seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold Motion carried. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Maetzold adjourned the Council Meeting at 9:40 P.M. City Clerk Page 16 ow e 0 TO: FROM: VIA: AGENDA ITEM: I I. A. DATE: July 18, 2000 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE MAYOR AND COUNCIL SUSAN HEIBERG GORDON L. HUGHES, CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $1 ITEM DESCRIPTION: RE -ROOF THE REMAINDER OF CITY HALL COMPANY 1. Sela Roofing 2 M & S Roofing 3 Granite City Roofing 4 Dalco Roofing 5. B & B Roofing RECOMMENDED BID: 11 Sela Roofing at $85,000.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: BID AMOUNT 1. $ 85,000.00 2 $112,247.00 . 3 $116,310.00 4 $120,025.00 5. $125,800.00 A portion of City Hall was 're- roofed in 1995. At this time, much of the remaining roof is problema.ti.c; repetitious leaking occurs with every rainfall. This project is to- remove and re-roof the remaining sections of City Hall's roof. The professional consultant indicates that Sela Roofing has done work for the.City before and is capable of completing the job as specified and in a timely manner. j Signature Department The Recomm Bids ded (within budget) Fx1 (not within budget) Gor o L. Hughes, Cit4danager John Wallin, Finance Director Y o e ' C ss REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item III.A. From: VINCE BONGAARTS Consent El TRAFFIC SAFETY COORDINATOR Information Only ❑ Date: JULY 189 2000 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To BRA ® To Council Subject: TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF ® Motion REVIEW OF JULY 10, 2000 ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ® Discussion RECOMMENDATION: Approve Traffic Safety Staff Review of July 10, 2000. INFORMATION/BACKGROUND: At the July 18, 2000, Council meeting, residents may be in attendance to speak to the issue of Section B.1, the request and subsequent denial of STOP signs on Lakeview Drive at St. Johns Avenue. TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW THURSDAY, JULY 10, 2000 The staff review of traffic safety matters occurred on July 10, 2000. Staff present included the Police Chief, the City Engineer, the City Planner, the Public Works Traffic Control Specialist and the Traffic Safety Coordinator. From that review, the below recommendations are provided. On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and the staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They have also been informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, they can be included on the July 18, 2000, Council Agenda. SECTION A: Requests on which the staff recommends approval. Request for "Signal your Turn" signs, both directions on Braemar Boulevard, to indicate whether vehicle is going to continue along Braemar Boulevard or turn to go onto Valley View Road. Requestor feels these signs are needed to assist vehicles entering Braemar Boulevard from Valley View Road. These vehicles are required to yield to Braemar Boulevard traffic. This location actually consists of two intersections connected by a short piece of road intersection where Valley View Road traffic enters Braemar Boulevard and an intersection where Braemar Boulevard traffic enters Valley View Road. There is a small island splitting the connecting road where it enters Valley View Road that actually creates two exits /entrances to Valley View Road. These two exits to Valley View Road have "Stop" signs requiring vehicles from Braemar Boulevard to stop prior to entering Valley View Road. In the opposite direction of the connecting roadway there is only one exit/entrance to Braemar Boulevard. The vehicles entering Braemar Boulevard from Valley View Road have a "Yield" sign requiring them to yield to Braemar traffic. On 2/2/99, the staff recommended that engineering evaluate these intersections for possible reconfiguration. Part of the problem in the reconstruction of these intersections is a large lone oak tree that sits in the middle of the island on the connecting roadway. This oak tree would probably have to come down. TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW July 10, 2000 Page 2 The problem with the intersection is more evident during rush hours where 14 of the 17 accidents since 1992 have occurred. The staff recommends that the "Yield" sign for traffic entering Braemar Boulevard from Valley View Road be changed to a "Stop" sign requiring vehicles to stop prior to entering Braemar Boulevard. This action would eliminate the need for "Signal Your Turn" signs which the staff do not consider effective. 2. A request for a "Deaf Child /Hearing Impaired Child" sign in the 5800 block of Oaklawn Avenue. The requestor lives at 5821 Oaklawn. The child is six years old and entering the first grade. The child has a severe hearing loss requiring hearing aids. However, when the child is at play outside there are many times the hearing aids are not used to eliminate damage caused by moisture from sweat, rain, etc. This is normal for many people using hearing aids. The family has agreed to notify the City of any changes in their status as residents so signs can be removed. The staff recommends the installation of "Deaf Child" signs north and south of requestor's home at 5821 Oaklawn Avenue. SECTION B: Requests on which the staff recommends denial of request. Request for "Stop" signs on Lakeview Drive at St. Johns Avenue. The requestor is concerned for the safety of the children and wants the signs to control the speed of cars on Lakeview Drive. There have been similar requests for this location in 1998 and 1999 that were denied for lack of warrants. However, this request is apparently supported by a petition with signatures of most of the residents. This is an area with no sidewalks. The intersection has no sight problems for any direction. A traffic survey done in June of this year showed a Monday through Friday average daily traffic on 389 vehicles and an 85 percentile speed of 29 mph. TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW July 10, 2000 Page 3 Recent accident history shows a personal injury accident on 4/17/99 at 9:00 am where a vehicle westbound on Lakeview collided with a vehicle northbound on St. Johns. Both drivers were listed as being inattentive. There were also minor property damage accidents on 1/7/97 and 1/27/97. No reports were made. No other accidents were found back to 1992. The request creates a dilemma for.the staff and subsequently the Council due to the past controversy and actions taken regarding the traffic along the St. Johns corridor. The St. Johns corridor is basically St. Johns Avenue which runs north - south between Golf Terrace and West Woodland Road with Wooddale Avenue one block to the east and Concord Avenue one block to the west and they also run north- south. St. Johns Avenue intersects with six streets in this corridor. These six streets also intersect with Wooddale Avenue on the east and Concord on the west except for Golf Terrace. St. Johns Avenue 'T's with Golf Terrace at the north end of the corridor. Several years ago the residents on Golf Terrace felt they were getting too much cut - through traffic and speed, and convinced the Council they should have a 3- way -all -way "Stop ". Lakeview Drive is next and presently has no signs. South of Lakeview is Oak Drive. Last year the residents of Oak Drive came up with a petition signed by 96% of their residents to convince the Council to install "Stop" signs on Oak Drive at St. Johns. South of Oak is W. 56tH Street. Several years ago "Stop" signs were installed on W. 56th Street at St. Johns. South of W. 56th Street is Tower Street. At one time years ago there were "Stop" signs on St. Johns at Tower. Most of the traffic years ago, when the high school was still at the Community Center site, would use Tower Street or W. 56 h Street to get from Southview to Wooddale and vice versa. When the "Stop" signs went in on W. 56th Street at St. Johns the traffic started using Tower Street more as there were no "Stop" signs for east -west traffic. Again, there was Council action and the "Stop" signs on St. Johns at Tower Street got switched to Tower Street and removed from St. Johns. South of Tower Street is W. Woodland Road. Presently there are "Yield" signs on St. Johns with no signs on W..Woodland Road. The residents on W. Woodland Road have requested "Stop" signs the past two years which have been denied for lack of warrants. West Woodland Road, Lakeview Drive and Oak Drive are similar in traffic and design. The average daily traffic on W. Woodland Road is 428 vehicles, Lakeview Drive - 389 vehicles and Oak Drive - 332 vehicles. St. Johns Avenue which intersects with these three streets carries only 101 vehicles per day. Using speed as a consideration, Oak Drive prior to installation of "Stop" signs last year had an 85 percentile speed of 27 mph. Surveys done this year shows the speed percentile still at 27 mph. Lakeview Drive has an 85 percentile speed TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW July 10, 2000 Page 4 of 29 mph and W. Woodland Road which has been denied "Stop" signs in the past, has an 85 percentile speed of 32 mph. One problem that arises is one of justification. If Oak Drive qualifies for "Stop" signs shouldn't Lakeview Drive and W. Woodland Road? While doing surveys this year comparing traffic and speed on Oak Drive and Lakeview Drive, I spoke with several residents on Oak Drive and asked them if they thought the "Stop" signs on Oak,Drive had helped the traffic situation. They all thought they had helped but also thought the speed on St. Johns has picked up being traffic on Oak Drive had to stop. Speed surveys for St. Johns actually showed that the speed had dropped slightly from an 85 percentile of 27 mph to 26 mph. The staff feels that there are no warrants to justify installation of the "Stop" signs and recommends denial of the request. 2. Request to designate the right lane for northbound Wooddale at W. 50`h Street as a 'right turn lane only' lane. The requestor says that there are often near accidents at this location when vehicles in the right lane cut in front of those in the left lane that are continuing north on Wooddale. There are times when the left lane traffic turning left to westbound W. 50th Street gets backed up waiting for southbound traffic to clear the intersection and the right-lane is used to get around those vehicles waiting to turn left. Although there have been several accidents at this intersection through the years none could be found that were attributed to the above described action. The staff feels that restriction of right lane to a right turn lane only would cause the left lane to back up and create more problems. The staff recommends denial of the request. SECTION C: Requests which are deferred to a later date or referred to others. A request for marked pedestrian crosswalk at 7340 Gallagher Drive connecting the sidewalk on the west side of Gallagher with the sidewalk on the east side. TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW July 10, 2000 16 Page 5 The requestor says that this is a regular bus stop for MTC and also the school buses from the high school, and elementary schools including Our Lady of Grace. The bus stops are on both sides of Gallagher at 7340 Gallagher. Gallagher is a fairly wide two lane street with no parking allowed on either side and sidewalks that run the entire length on both sides. This is also an apartment/condo area that generates a fair amount of traffic. The requestor is concerned that the wideness of Gallagher and heavy traffic creates a safety concern for all those using the bus stops. A traffic survey done in June of this year showed the average Monday through Friday traffic to be 1830 vehicles. The 85 percentile speed was 33 mph. Of the vehicles surveyed, 5% were at 36+ mph. There was only one accident found for this location . The personal injury accident occurred on 8/31/99 at 12:00 pm. It did involve two vehicles and happened when one vehicle made a u -turn in front of the other vehicle. The survey also indicated that there is an average of 34 buses a day, 17 each way, using Gallagher. This was done after school was out so it didn't include school buses. The staff has decided to continue this to a later date in order to gather some more information regarding justification for a mid -block crosswalk. 2. A request for better signing to assist drivers in locating Valley View Road north of the Crosstown Highway from Tracy Avenue. This request came up at the staff meeting on July 10th and there was not sufficient research done to make a proper recommendation. It was originally related that the requestor wanted a "No Through Traffic" sign at Doron Lane and Valley Lane. The staff had decided to recommend a denial on that request. However, a call to the requestor found that not to be what the requestor was really looking for. This request will be continued to a later date in order to look at options available. 3. The staff discussed a letter dated June 21, 2000 that was received from residents in the 4500 -4600 blocks of Wooddale. The letter in essence was requesting the City to reduce the traffic and speed on their street. A copy of that letter is attached to this report. TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW July 10, 2000 Page 6 Until the construction is completed on Bridge Street and also at 50th & France there is little that can be done to study this situation. However, it should be noted that in the past prior to the construction neither the Police Department or the Traffic Safety Coordinator could find any evidence of excessive speed in the 4500 -4600 blocks of Wooddale. There is a high volume of traffic but less than there was in 1993. In 1993 the average daily traffic of these two blocks was 2755 vehicles. In a survey done in 1999 it was 1969 vehicles. Wooddale has been a residential collector street since at least the late 1950's - early 1960's. Wooddale has connected the area south of W. 50th Street (east of Highway 100) with St. Louis Park and the Morningside area. The 4500 -4600 blocks of Wooddale is also an area with sidewalks and large boulevards. For the volume of traffic it does carry its one of the safer streets in Edina. The staff will look at this area again in the future.when the construction is completed. Mr. Hoffman, director of Public Works, and others will meet with this group in the near future to discuss the situation. 4 91N�1r o e • `NC�RPOO �� REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # III.B. From: Francis J. Hoffman 'J�Ji( Consent City Engineer Information Only ❑ Date: July 18, 2000 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA To Council Subject: Public Hearing for Edina Action ® Motion Wellhead Protection ® Resolution Program. ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Hold Public Hearing and accept Wellhead Protection Program. Info /Background: The Minnesota Department of Health finalized the Wellhead Protection Program (WPP) and promulgated the rules in November of 1997. The purpose of the WWP is to prevent contaminants that could affect the public health, from entering public water supply system. A Public Hearing is required under Minnesota Rules Chapter 4720.5200. The consultant Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. will present this report and answer any questions at the Public Hearing. Council may then accept this program. Attached is a copy of the Wellhead Protection Program. You may return this plan to myself for further distribution. ro a g ° � .,,. lees REPORT/R To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Date: Subject. RICK PETERSBURG CITY ASSESSOR JULY 18, 2000 ECOMMENDATION DEVELOP CONTRACT WITH . VANGUARD APPRAISALS, INC. REAPPRAISAL OF ALL SINGLE FAMILY IMPROVED RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES AND SOFTWARE RECOMMENDATION: Agenda Item III.C. Consent Information Only Mgr. Recommends " To HRA To Council Motion Resolution Ordinance Discussion Approve project concept and instruct staff to develop contract with Vanguard Appraisals, Inc. INFO/BACKGROUND: The Edina Assessor's Office requests authority to retain the services of Vanguard Appraisals, Inc. in order to successfully implement the reappraisal of all improved single family residential properties in Edina. Most data on those 11,277 property record cards are 27 to 30 years old and may be incorrect. Those same properties, in most cases, have not been inspected in many years. Because of this, equalization issues based on poor property record data have become apparent. Staffing levels have made it impossible to comply with Minnesota Statute 273.08 which requires each county and city to inspect each property every four years (i.e. a "quartile review'). The information gathered when a property is physically inspected and reviewed, during a quartile review, is used to value the entire city each year. With current and accurate data most equalization issues can be eliminated. REPORT/ RECOMMENDATION: Contract with Vanguard Appraisals, Inc. July 18, 2000 Page two Request for Proposals were issued to four reappraisal firms on April 26, 2000. Of the four candidates two declined to submit proposals at this time. The two companies that did submit proposals were: 1) Cole Layer Trumble Company and 2) Vanguard Appraisals, Inc. Both proposals were thoroughly analyzed. Both companies were interviewed. On site interviews with past and current users of their products were conducted. Staff and the City Manager have reviewed the preliminary proposals and based on our findings recommend pursuing a contract with Vanguard Appraisals, Inc. Based on Vanguards proposal, we anticipate a cost of approximately $410,000. We recommend that the cost of this work be funded through City reserves and the 2001 budget ($250,000 of such reserves have been already designated for this purpose). Staff will have a presentation of the Request for Proposals, information and the process followed to date. SIDENTIAL PROPERTY RECORD AND APPRAISAL CARD EET ADDRESS 4514 Arden Avenue SSESSMENT DIST. SCHOOL DIST. NO. 17 LOT 7 BLOCK 3 ADD. COUNTRY CLUB DI -STRICT FAIRWAY SECTION Bill[ DING; PERMIT RFrF)Rn Date Number Amount Purpose Front. Ft. Price Top. Intl. Total rno HOME - STEAD Yes No pua rze Abatement, etc. ASSESSED VALUES HOMESTEAD Z5% REMAINDER n 40o, TOTAL some homestead. List parcel numbers. TOPOGRAPHY IMPROVEMENTS STREETS Level Sidewalks Asphalt High Curb G Gutter Concrete Low City Water Brick Sanitary Sewer Gravel DRAINAGE Storm Sewer Dirt Good -Fair -Poor NOVI Gas with alley LOCATION ZONING OR USE Corner Lot 259 24 Residential Commercial Inside Lot Dbl. Bung. 00 Industrial r: I:'7 337700 :. 7 Multi - Family General Desirability: Good Fair Poor Other: LAND VALUE COMPUTATIONS Frontage Figured Average Depth Unit Price Unit Percent Front. Ft. Price Top. Intl. Total rno HOME - STEAD Yes No pua rze Abatement, etc. ASSESSED VALUES HOMESTEAD Z5% REMAINDER n 40o, TOTAL r,AI Fr, INF()RUATION Date Consideration Kind of Inst. Remarks FULL VALUE OF LAND FULL VALUE OF STRUCTURES — TOTAL VALUE OF LAND AND STRUCTURES rno HOME - STEAD Yes No pua rze Abatement, etc. ASSESSED VALUES HOMESTEAD Z5% REMAINDER n 40o, TOTAL Contract for Deed held by: 1AJ 1> PLAT NO. 74830 PARCEL NO. 9O0__ r J ASSESSMENT SUMMARY ,. YEAR FVM ARKET L UE OF LAND MARKET VALUE OF STRUCTURES TOTAL MARKET VALUE FULL VALUE OF LAND FULL VALUE OF STRUCTURES — TOTAL VALUE OF LAND AND STRUCTURES rno HOME - STEAD Yes No pua rze Abatement, etc. ASSESSED VALUES HOMESTEAD Z5% REMAINDER n 40o, TOTAL 24704,2 259 24 00 ZL'I % r: I:'7 337700 :. 7 RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY RECORD AND APPRAISAL CARD ADDRESSSI� �liYYD�/✓ A�It��, PLAT NO. PARCEL NO. alum. =-� N iG/17 �_ e . . 8-�y— 90 E#�o CFafw•. dAZ* , Pow. A 3 lss,' Q' @ DESCRIPTION OF PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE OTHER STRUCTURES TINGLE DWLG. Yr. Built - / 15q Grade 11114 No. of Stories Const. Cost v1ULTl. DWLG. Observed Physical Condition: Good_ Normal Fair_ Poor__ Mo. Rental GARAGE Grade Yr. Built Att. Det. V' Found. Floor iti= Roof (,v A jar l Exterior Finish_Overhead Door —Auto 2 —S Control Bsmt. S77/GdZ FOUNDATION ROOF PLUMBING z ROOMS WIRING :oncrete Flat City Water Living Room/_ —F X CABLE BREEZEWAY Describe: C 1i/. — OG -VZ-�5 :onc. Blk. Gable Well G Pump Dining ROD Rigid Conduit 3rick Hip Sewer Kitchen BUILT -INS Irregular Septic Tank Bedrooms Breakfast Nook EXTERIOR WALLS Shingle, Asphalt esspool Den or Study Bookcases YARD IMPROVEMENTS Driveways, Fences, Ret. Walls, Barbecue Pits, Describe: Patios; Swimming Pools, Etc. _ �y7F1 ✓ �X' C' _ ZNO �L-k'. Tiding and Sheeting Shingle, Wood Baths 0 Fixt.) Rec. Room /W-� China Closet Nood Shakes Slate Half Bath Q Fixt.) Utility Extra Kit. Cobts. -om osition Shakes Tie Sin a Fixtures g Refrigerator ledwood Roll, Composition W Elec a ange G Oven itucco Shakes Water Softner INTERIOR FINISH Dishwasher 3rick Veneer Tor an rave dw F oars Garbage Disp. :am. or Rug. Insulated HEATING Softwood Floors OUT BUILDINGS Sheds, Cabins, Boathouses, Sholls, Describe: Greenhouses, E ��r�� GArva7F #q t. lemon or Face Fireplaces Inside Z Concrete Floors G (Sq. Ft.) itone BASEME Fireplaces Outside Linoleum Floors er. Plas. None Fu Hot Air: Pipeless Carpeted Floors Bo—t —1 Holt Insulated, Yes No. Partin o Piped (Gravity) Hardwood Trim Kitchen PORCH U .n.s a Forced circa to Softwood Trim BUILDING DIAGRAM AN Draw to scale. and shoi OUTBUILDI ri - GS dozed: Partitioned Ste Plastered Int. MISCELLANEOUS icreen: Finished at or Vapor Drywall Int. Incinerator, en: a out iant once aminated Swim. Pool • • , • • . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . '. (�. IC /.y. (p No . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . " """"•"" '•""•••• ••.. ••'. ?•:...' ... •.... •. ...... , • • • • • .�10. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . • . . . . . . . . . . . • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • : :: ........ :� . . . . . . . . .1. . .. . .. \. . . . . . . . `� . . . . . . . . . ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' v . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • . . .......... ....... .40D-) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . QQ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...v. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , • . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . kEC. Z I ..... ........ .... . .... L Z . . . . . . ... .. .. _ . .. . 4 I ... . ... . :.. : . . . .. . . . . . . . . : .... .......... .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 .. :�. ¢ . . . . . .!'!. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • ' • .. .. • .. .. .. .. .. ' : .. : : : : � rsl . . . ... :: . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • !. ::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::. sro:::::::::::::::: Oil— Coal Ga rn/p/ / • )ate of Appraisal 7 _ G I By: Cc' Interior Inspected es STRUCTURAL VALUE COMPUTATIONS STRUCTURES DIMENSIONS AREA SQ. FT. RATE/S.F. DEP. G OBS. /o OFF NET RATE S.F MARKET VALUE soLatbQS iOUSE z8 X 30 NSL. S. I Z Flat Charges Basement Finished Repl. Cost 1� 4K 10 O.. A % G.00 Extra Plumbing Built -ins b Mise. rf 1 F Porches X 3°O TOTAL $ 1710 TOTAL FLAT CHARGES AREA= 3ARAGE 18 X +' X 702 .2 LARD IMPS. �EI°R. x-7d 0 5 9 e )UTBUILDINGS 19 TOTAL MARKET VALUE OF STRUCTURES $ uture Adjustments: — alum. =-� N iG/17 �_ e . . 8-�y— 90 E#�o CFafw•. dAZ* , Pow. A 3 lss,' Q' @ I rrProperty Record Card (Working Parcel) Vanguard Appraisals, Inc. Rear Tue 1/18/2000, 9:03 AM Page 1 PDF +PIN: 001 +11 - 18-426 -028 Deed: SYNDEY, TOM Map Area: OSKALOOSA -R Checks/Tags: Address: 30 PARK PLACE Contract: Route: 609 -001 -080 Lister /Date: EK, 0210211999 City: CID* Tax Dist: 555 Review /Date: EK, 04/01/1999 URBAN/RESIDENTIAL DBA: Plat Page: 11 -18H Entry Status: Inspected New Dwlg Land $35,000 Grade Land Basis Front Rear Side 1 Side 2 R. Lot SF Acres Fego EFF Qual. /Land Unit Price Total Topo Econ Other $Adj Rnd ne T2;a o Lump Sum $303,800 New Dwlg Land $35,000 Grade 39,639.60 0.91 1/23/1992 $25,000 D049 252 -434 $35,000 0% 0% 0% $0 $35,000 Grand Total 39,639.60 0.91 Impr $35,000 $35,000 Sales Buildina Permits Values Date $ Amount NUTC Recording Date Number $Amount Reason Type Appraised B of R ST. Equalized 1,026 5/5/1999 $360,000 D000 300 -250 8/27/1998 6043 $303,800 New Dwlg Land $35,000 Grade 2 +10 1/23/1992 $25,000 D049 252 -434 Dw1g $310,540 Impr Total $345,540 Res. Structure 1 or 1 Finish Plumbing Addition Garage Occ Code 101 TV Rooms Above # 7 Bedrooms Above # 4 Full Bath 1 Addition 1 Of 1 Garage 1 Of 1 Ttl Rooms Below # 0 Bedrooms Below # 0 Shower Stall Bath Year Built 1998 Style Att Brick Occ. Descr. Single- Family / Bsmt Fin Area #1 Toilet Room m 1 EFA 2 W X L 0' X 01 Owner Occupied Bsmt Fin Area #2 Lavatory Year Built 1998 Bsmt Fin Area #3 Water Closet EFA 2 Foundation Conc Sink Exterior Walls Vinyl Shower Stall/Tub EFF Year 1998 Root _ Asph / Hip Mtl St Sh Bath Style 2 Story Frame Interior Finish Drwl Mtl Stall Shower Flooring Carp / Vinyl No Bathroom AreaSFmA 1,040 /3,166 " i Wet Bar Non-baseHeating - Fireplace Grade 2+10 Floor/Wall# 0 Gas -Side, 1 Story 1 Whirlpool Bathroom Whirlpool Tub Pipeless # 0 No Hot Water Tank Grade Mult. 1.560 Hand Fired (YIN-) NO - Space Heat # 0 No Plumbing Condition Normal Sewer & Water Onry Phy - Depr.% 2% Appliances - - Water Only w /Sink Range Unit _ Intercom System Hot Tub Basement Full Oven Unit Intercom w /Music Bidet No Bsmt Fir. 0 Dishwasher Built -In Stereo _ Fbgts Service Sink Microwave _ BI Stereo(SpkrsOnly) Heat FHA - Gas Trash Compactor _ AC Yes Jennair Security System _ Attic None Built -In Vacuums L\\1 2 EFA Year 1998 Area (SF) 848 _ Style 1 Story Brick Year Built 1998 Area (SF) 1,026 EFA 2 _ 1 Condition Normal EFF Year 1998 Phy- Depr•% 2% Grade 2 +10 Bsmt (SF) 1,026 Condition Normal NoBsmt Flr(SF) Bsmt (SF) 1 Heel _ FHA - Gas Qtre Over Frame 1 AC Yes Qlrs Over (SF) 60 Attic (SF) _ Qlrs AC (SF) 60 %Phy /Fobs /Eobs 2 % -0 % -0% -or Opnrs Obsolescence B6 Stalls Functional % 0% Economic % 0% Other % 0% None No None' Copyright ©1997 -99 Vanguard Appraisals, Inc. PDF +PIN: 001+11-18-426-028 Tue, 1/18/2000, 9 03 AM Page 2 BI d ! Ad�n 1 of 1 Description Units Price I I 101 — Single - Family / Owner Occupied Base Value Grade Year Ph s Mult y Fobs Eobs Other Depreciated Total (Rnd nearest dollar) Ma p Appraised Value (Rnd nearest $10) 7 2 10 2 Story Frame 1,040 $102,780 3 1 5 9 3 Add Central Air 1,040 $2,670.00 $2,670 55 14 #1 Porch: 1S Brick Open 55 SF $1,660.00 $1.660 Basement Adjustment 55 SF $1,250.00 $1,250 Deck #1: Wood Deck -Med 928 SF $12.00 $11,136 Veneer #1 2 Story Brick 27 LF $111.00 $2,997 Plumbing 6 N/A $6,700 #1 Fireplace: Gas -Side. 1 Story 1 $2,400.00 $2,400 Garage Att Brick 0, X 0, 848 SF $24,031 1998 2% Building Sub Total $155,624 1.560 1998 2% 0% 0% 0% $237,918 1 of 1 Adtn 1 Story Brick 1,026 SF 547.504 1.560 1998 2% 0% 0% 0% $72,624 Building TOTAL Value $310,542 1 $310,540 12 4 WD DK 8 8 [ 928 j 10 14 20 2S B FR (MAIN) 8 12 [ 1040 ] 3 28 1S B BRK 18 [ 1026 l 18 FR QUAR [ 60 1 20 16 .........- 5 5 22 3 3 32 1 S BRK GAR 6 1 11 2 g 1 [ 848 l 4 8 12 5 1 S B BRK OP 13 [ 55 ] 74 27 LF 2S BRK Photo 1 of 1 Sketch 1 of 1 Notes 1 out of 1 (up to 3 each): VERY NICE POPLAR WOODWORK WITH CHERRY STAIN FINISH THROUGHOUT. LARGE GREAT RM IN REAR PRICED WITH MAIN. 2g 2 9 9 7 2 10 Jr 42 3 1 5 9 3 55 14 10 14 20 2S B FR (MAIN) 8 12 [ 1040 ] 3 28 1S B BRK 18 [ 1026 l 18 FR QUAR [ 60 1 20 16 .........- 5 5 22 3 3 32 1 S BRK GAR 6 1 11 2 g 1 [ 848 l 4 8 12 5 1 S B BRK OP 13 [ 55 ] 74 27 LF 2S BRK Photo 1 of 1 Sketch 1 of 1 Notes 1 out of 1 (up to 3 each): VERY NICE POPLAR WOODWORK WITH CHERRY STAIN FINISH THROUGHOUT. LARGE GREAT RM IN REAR PRICED WITH MAIN. o e v Oil �y -`'U,RBPC81� " REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: ° MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: ERIC ANDERSON ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER Date: JULY 18, 2000 Subject: RESOLUTION 2000 -71 APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO CITY'S DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN I & II Agenda Item III.E. Consent Information Only Mgr. Recommends RECOMMENDATION: Approve amendments to City's deferred compensation plans I & H. INFO/BACKGROUND: ❑ To BRA To Council ❑ Motion ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Attached are two amendments to the City's deferred compensation plans that were established in 1999. These amendments are technical corrections to the plan that establish the ability to recognize an "alternate payee" under a qualified domestic relations order or a domestic relations order. Under section 457 of the Internal Revenue Code, payments made through a qualified domestic relations order (QDRO) may be placed in trust until the participant is no longer in pay status. Each of these amendments would allow the City to place the payments in trust. Both amendments are identical and apply to the ICMA and T. Rowe Price deferred compensation plans. FIRST AMENDMENT OF THE CITY OF EDINA DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN I (1999 RESTATEMENT) THIS AMENDMENT, made and entered into as of , 2000, by the City of Edina, a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota; WHEREAS, the City of Edina established a deferred compensation plan for the exclusive benefit of covered employees, which plan is embodied in a document dated July 1, 1989, and entitled "City of Edina Deferred Compensation Plan I" and which was subsequently amended and restated in a document dated December 21, 1998, effective January 1, 1999, and embodied in a document entitled "City of Edina Deferred Compensation Plan I (1999 Restatement)" (referred to herein as the "Plan"); WHEREAS, the Plan is intended to be an eligible deferred compensation plan under section 457(b) of the Internal Revenue Code, and the regulations thereunder, and other applicable law; WHEREAS, the City of Edina established a tax - exempt trust to be used in connection with the Plan pursuant to and as required by section 457(g) of the Internal Revenue Code, and determined to contribute amounts to the trust to satisfy the liabilities under the Plan, which trust is embodied in a document dated December 21, 1998, effective January 1, 1999, and entitled "City of Edina Deferred Compensation Trust Agreement (For the City of Edina Deferred Compensation Plan I)" (referred to herein as the "Trust "); and WHEREAS, the City of Edina has reserved to itself in Section 9.1 of the Plan the right to amend the Plan at any time and from time to time, in whole or in part in the same manner as any other action which may be taken by the City of Edina. NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 1. BENEFICIARY. Effective as of January 1, 2000, Section 1.2.3 of the Plan shall be, and hereby is, amended by deleting that section in its entirety and substituting therefor the following new Section 1.2.3: 1.2.3. Beneficiary -- shall mean the person or persons designated by a Participant (or automatically by operation of the Plan) to receive the benefits payable under this Plan in the event of the Participant's death prior to full distribution thereof. Except as otherwise provided in Section 8.4, a person so designated shall not be considered a Beneficiary until the death of the Participant. However, subject to the requirements of section 457 of the Code and Section 8.4 of the Plan, a person determined to be an alternate payee under a qualified domestic relations order by the Committee under Section 8.4 shall be considered for purposes of the provisions of the Plan and the Trust a Beneficiary under the Plan and the Trust. 2. SPENDTHRIFT PROVISION. Effective as of January 1, 2000, Section 8.3 of the Plan shall be, and hereby is, amended by Aeleting that section in its entirety and substituting therefor the following new Section 8.3: 8.3. Spendthrift Provision. 8.3.1. Except as otherwise provided in this Section 8.3, no Participant or Beneficiary shall have any interest in any Account which can be transferred nor shall any Participant or Beneficiary have any power to anticipate, alienate, dispose of, pledge or encumber any amounts credited to any Account under the Plan, nor shall the City of Edina recognize any assignment thereof, either in whole or in part, nor shall any amounts credited to any Account under the Plan be subject to attachment, garnishment, execution following judgment or other legal process. 8.3.2. The power to designate Beneficiaries to receive the amounts credited to the Account of a Participant in the event of such Participant's death shall not permit or be construed to permit such power or right to be exercised by the Participant so as thereby to anticipate, pledge, mortgage or encumber such Participant's Account or any part thereof, and any attempt of a Participant so to exercise said power in violation of this provision shall be of no force and effect and shall be disregarded by the City of Edina. 8.3.3. Section 8.3 shall not prevent ,the City of Edina from exercising, in its discretion, any of the applicable powers and options granted to it upon the occurrence of a distributable event described in Section 6.1, as such powers may be conferred upon it by any applicable provision hereof. 8.3.4. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Plan will comply with a domestic relations order that is determined to be a "qualified domestic relations order" by the Committee in accordance with Section 8.4 of the Plan and requirements similar to the requirements of section 414(p) of the Code. 3. DOMESTIC RELATIONS ORDERS. Effective as of January 1, 2000, Section 8 of the Plan shall be, and hereby is, amended by adding thereto the following new Section 8.4: 8.4. Domestic Relations Orders. 8.4.1. The requirements of Section 8.3 of the Plan shall not apply to a domestic relations order that is determined to be a "qualified domestic relations order" by the Committee in accordance with Section 8.4 and requirements similar to the requirements of section 414(p) of the Code. A "qualified domestic relations order" shall mean any judgment, decree, or order (including approval of a property settlement agreement) which creates or recognizes the existence of an alternate payee's right to receive all or a portion of the, benefits payable with respect to a Participant under the Plan, pursuant to a State's domestic relations law relating to the provision of child support, -2- alimony payments, or marital property rights to a spouse, former spouse, child, or other dependent of the Participant; provided, however, that such order specifically provides: (a) the name and last known mailing address of the Participant, and of each alternate payee covered by such order; (b) the amount or percentage of the Participant's benefits to be paid by the Plan to each alternate payee, or the manner in which such amount or percentage is to be determined and that the manner and time of the distribution of the benefits satisfy the distribution requirements of sections 457(d) and 401(a)(9) of the Code; (c) the number of payments or the period to which such order applies; (d) the distribution to an alternate payee of the benefits of a Participant shall occur only with respect to a Participant in pay status (currently eligible to receive distributions) under section 457(d)(1)(A) of the Code to the alternate payee named in the order to meet the Participant's obligations with respect to alimony, support, or the division of marital rights; (e) the rights of an alternate payee shall not be greater than those of the Participant; (fl the alternate payee may not receive a distribution under section 457(d) of an amount because of an unforeseeable emergency or receive a distribution under section 457(e)(9) of the Code of an amount that does not exceed the dollar limit under section 411(a)(11)(A) of the Code; and (g) the name of the Plan. 8.4.2. The Committee shall establish reasonable written procedures to determine the qualified status of domestic relations orders in accordance with requirements similar to the requirements of section 414(p) of the Code and the provisions of this Section 8.4, and to administer distributions made thereunder in a manner consistent with sections 457(b)(5) and 457(d) of the Code. 8.4.3. The Committee shall administer domestic relations orders in a manner consistent with the following requirements: (a) the Committee shall promptly notify the Participant and any named alternate payee of the receipt of a domestic relations order and the Plan procedures used for determining whether such order is a qualified domestic relations order; -3- (b) the Committee shall, within a reasonable .period following receipt of such order, determine whether such order is a qualified domestic relations order and notify the Participant and each alternate payee of such determination; (c) during the period beginning when the order is received and ending with the earlier of the date of determination of its qualified status or the expiration of eighteen (18) months, the Committee shall separately account for the amounts which would have been payable to the alternate payee during such period if the domestic relations order had been determined to be a qualified domestic relations order; (d) if, within eighteen (18) months of receipt of such order, the order is determined to be a qualified domestic relations order, the Committee shall separately account for the amounts which will be payable to the alternate payee pursuant to such order and shall pay such amounts in accordance with the requirements of sections 457(b)(5) and-457(d) of the Code and Section 7.2 of the Plan; provided, however, that no distribution shall be made in accordance with Section 7.2.3 of the Plan or section 457(e)(9) of the Code with respect to an alternate payee; (e) if, within eighteen (18) months of receipt of such order, the order is determined not to be qualified or the order's status is unresolved, the Committee shall pay the amounts described in Section 8.4.3(c) to the person or persons who would have been entitled to such amounts if no domestic relations order had been received; (f) a determination that a domestic relations order is qualified which is made later than eighteen (18) months after the receipt of such order shall operate prospectively only. 8.4.4. If an order is determined by the Committee to be a qualified domestic relations order with respect to all or any portion of a Participant's benefit payable under the Plan, then, subject to the requirements of section 457 of the Code and this Section 8.4, the alternate payee shall be considered for purposes of the provisions of the Plan and the Trust to be a Beneficiary under the Plan and the Trust. 8.4.5. Amounts of compensation deferred in accordance with the Plan, including any earnings attributable to the deferred compensation, to which the alternate payee under a qualified domestic relations order has derived the right to receive pursuant to such qualified domestic relations order, will be subject to tax at such time, in such manner, and with respect to such Participant or Beneficiary (including an alternate payee identified in a domestic relations order) in accordance with the applicable requirements of the Internal Revenue Code. -4- 8.4.6. Distributions made pursuant to Section 8.4 shall completely discharge the Plan of its obligations with respect to the Participant and each alternate payee to the extent of any such distributions. 4. SAVINGS CLAUSE. Save and except as hereinabove expressly amended, the Plan shall continue in full force and effect. CITY OF EDINA By: Mayor of the City of Edina -5- is i4: FIRST AMENDMENT OF THE CITY OF EDINA DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN II (1999 RESTATEMENT) THIS AMENDMENT, made and entered into as of , 20009 by the City of Edina, a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota; WHEREAS, the City of Edina established a deferred compensation plan for the exclusive benefit of covered employees, which plan is embodied in a document dated October 10, 1991, and entitled "City of Edina Deferred Compensation Plan IF and which was subsequently amended and restated in a document dated December 21, 1998, effective January 1, 1999, and embodied in a document entitled "City of Edina Deferred Compensation Plan 11 (1999 Restatement)" (referred to herein as the "Plan"); WHEREAS, the Plan is intended to be an eligible deferred compensation plan under section 457(b) of the Internal Revenue Code, and the regulations thereunder, and other applicable law; WHEREAS, the City of Edina established a tax - exempt trust to be used in connection with -the Plan pursuant to and as required by section 457(g) of the Internal Revenue Code, and determined to contribute amounts to the trust to satisfy the liabilities under the Plan, which trust is embodied in a document dated December 21, 1998, effective January 1, 1999, and entitled "City of Edina Deferred Compensation Trust Agreement (For the City of Edina Deferred Compensation Plan II)" (referred to herein as the "Trust "); and WHEREAS, the City of Edina has reserved to itself in Section 9.1 of the Plan the right to amend the Plan at any time and from time to time, in whole or in part in the same manner as any other action which may be taken by the City of Edina. NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 1. BENEFICIARY. Effective as of January 1,2000, Section 1.2.3 of the Plan shall be, and hereby is, amended by deleting that section in its entirety and substituting therefor the following new Section 1.2.3: 1.2.3. Beneficiary -- shall mean the person or persons designated by a Participant (or automatically by operation of the Plan) to receive the benefits payable under this Plan in, the event of the Participant's death prior to full distribution thereof. Except as otherwise provided in Section 8.4, a person so designated shall not be considered a Beneficiary until the death of the Participant. However, subject to the requirements of section 457 of the Code and Section 8.4 of the. Plan, a person determined to be an alternate payee under a qualified domestic relations order by the Committee under Section 8.4 shall be considered for purposes of the provisions of the Plan and the Trust a Beneficiary under the Plan and the Trust. 0 2. SPENDTHRIFT PROVISION. Effective as of January 1, 2000, Section 8.3 of the Plan shall be, and hereby is, amended by deleting that section in its entirety and substituting therefor the following new Section 8.3: 8.3. Spendthrift Provision. 8.3.1. Except as otherwise provided in this Section 8.3, no Participant or Beneficiary shall have any interest in any Account which can be ,transferred nor shall any Participant or Beneficiary have any power to anticipate, alienate, dispose of, pledge or encumber any amounts credited to any Account under the Plan, nor shall the City of Edina recognize any assignment thereof, either in whole or in part, nor shall any amounts credited to any Account under the Plan be subject to attachment, garnishment, execution following judgment or other legal process. 8.3.2. . The power to designate Beneficiaries to receive the amounts credited to the Account of a Participant in the event of such Participant's death shall not permit or be construed. to permit such power or right to be exercised by the Participant so as thereby to anticipate, pledge, mortgage or encumber such Participant's Account or any, part thereof, and any attempt of a Participant so to exercise said power in violation of this provision shall be of no force and effect and shall be disregarded by the City of Edina. 8.3.3. Section 8.3 shall not prevent the City of Edina from exercising, in its discretion, any of . the applicable powers and. options granted to it upon the occurrence of a distributable event described in Section 6.1, as such powers may be conferred upon it by any applicable provision hereof. 8.3.4. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Plan will comply with a domestic relations order that is determined to be a "qualified domestic relations order" by the Committee in accordance with Section 8.4 of the Plan and requirements similar to the requirements of section 414(p) of the Code.' 3. DOMESTIC RELATIONS ORDERS. Effective as of January 1, 2000, Section 8 of the Plan shall be, and hereby is, amended by adding thereto the following new Section 8.4: 8.4. Domestic Relations Orders. 8.4.1. The requirements of Section 8.3 of the Plan shall not apply to a domestic relations order that is determined to be a "qualified domestic relations order" by the Committee in accordance with Section 8.4 and requirements similar to the requirements of section 414(p) of the Code. A "qualified domestic relations order" shall mean any judgment, decree, or order (including approval of a property settlement agreement) which creates or recognizes the existence of an alternate payee's right to receive all or a portion of the benefits payable with respect to a Participant under the Plan, pursuant to a State's domestic relations law relating to the provision of child support, -2- I alimony payments, or marital property rights to a spouse, former spouse, child, or other dependent of the Participant; provided, however, that such order specifically provides: (a) the name and last known mailing address of the Participant, and of each alternate payee covered by such order; (b) the amount or percentage of the Participant's benefits to be paid by the Plan to each alternate payee, or the manner in which such amount or percentage is to be determined and that the manner and time of the distribution of the benefits satisfy the distribution requirements of sections 457(d) and 401(a)(9) of the Code; (c) the number of payments or the period to which such order applies; (d) the distribution to an alternate payee of the benefits of a Participant shall occur only with respect to a Participant in pay status (currently eligible to receive distributions) under section 457(d)(1)(A) of the Code to the alternate payee named in the order to meet the Participant's obligations with respect to alimony, support, or the division of marital rights; (e) the rights of an alternate payee shall not be greater than those of the Participant; (f) the alternate payee may not receive a distribution under section 457(d) of an amount because of an unforeseeable emergency or receive a distribution under section 457(e)(9) of the Code of an amount that does not exceed the dollar limit under section 411 (a)(1 1)(A) of the Code; and (g) the name of the Plan. 8.4.2. The Committee shall establish reasonable written procedures to determine the qualified status of domestic relations orders in accordance with requirements similar to the requirements of section 414(p) of the Code and the provisions of this Section 8.4, and to administer distributions made thereunder in a manner consistent with sections 457(b)(5) and 457(d) of the Code. 8.4.3. The Committee shall administer domestic relations orders in a manner consistent with the following requirements: (a) the Committee shall promptly notify the Participant and any named alternate payee of the receipt of a domestic relations order and the Plan procedures used for determining whether such order is a qualified domestic relations order; -3- U (b) the Committee shall, within a reasonable period following receipt of such order, determine whether such order is a qualified domestic relations order and notify the Participant and each alternate payee of such determination; (c) during the period beginning when the order is received and ending with the earlier of the date of determination of its qualified status or the expiration of eighteen (18) months, the Committee shall separately'account for the amounts which would have been payable to the alternate payee during such period if the domestic relations order had been determined to be a qualified domestic relations order; (d) if, within eighteen (18) months of receipt of such order, the order is determined to be a qualified domestic relations order, the Committee shall separately account for the amounts which will be payable to the alternate payee pursuant to such order and shall pay such amounts in accordance with the requirements of sections 457(b)(5) and 457(d) of the Code and Section 7.2 , of the Plan; provided, however, that no distribution shall be made in accordance with Section 7.2.3 of the Plan or section 457(e)(9) of the Code with respect to an alternate payee; (e) if, within eighteen (18) months of receipt of such order, the order is determined not to be qualified or the order's status is unresolved, the Committee shall pay the amounts described in Section 8.4.3(c) to the person or persons who would have been entitled to such amounts if no domestic relations order had been received; (fl a determination that a domestic relations order is qualified which is made later than eighteen (18) months after the receipt of such order shall operate prospectively only. 8.4.4. If an order is determined by the Committee to be a qualified domestic relations order with respect to all or any portion of a Participant's benefit payable under the Plan, then, subject to the requirements of section 457 of the Code and this Section 8.4, the alternate payee shall be considered for purposes of the provisions of the Plan and the Trust to be a Beneficiary under the Plan and the Trust. 8.4.5. Amounts of compensation deferred in accordance with the Plan, including any earnings attributable to the deferred compensation, to which the alternate payee under a qualified domestic relations order has derived the right to receive pursuant to such qualified domestic relations order, will be subject to tax at such time, in such manner, and with respect to such Participant or Beneficiary (including an alternate payee identified in a domestic relations order) in accordance with the applicable requirements of the Internal Revenue Code. -4- I 8.4.6. Distributions made pursuant to Section 8.4 shall completely discharge the Plan of its obligations with respect to the Participant and each alternate payee to the extent of any such distributions. 4. SAVINGS CLAUSE. Save and except as hereinabove expressly amended, the Plan shall continue in full force and effect. CITY OF EDINA LE Mayor of the City of Edina -5- RESOLUTION NO. 2000-71 RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO CITY OF EDINA'S DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN I AND PLAN II City of Edina WHEREAS, previously, the City of Edina has established deferred compensation plans for the exclusive benefit of covered employees entitled, "City of Edina Deferred Compensation Plan I"; and "City of Edina Deferred Compensation Plan II "; and WHEREAS, the "City of Edina Deferred Compensation Plan I" (1999 Restatement) and "City of Edina Deferred Compensation Plan II" (1999 Restatement) requires amendments to permit an alternate payee under a "qualified domestic relations order" to obtain a right to amounts allocated to a plan participant's account pursuant to the order and the plan. NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Edina approves the said Amendments to the City of Edina's Deferred Compensation Plan I and Plan II, and authorizes the Mayor to execute the Amendments. ATTEST: City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of July 18, 2000, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of ,20 City Clerk City Hall (952) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (952) 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (952) 826 -0379 ' Ce J),, t � • — Ise roR�� REPORURECOMMENDATION To: Mayor Maetzold and members of Agenda Item III. G. the Edina City Council. From: John Keprios, Director Consent ❑ Park & Recreation Department Information Only Date: July 13, 2000 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Blue Ribbon Committee Statement ❑ Motion of Purpose. ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance L ❑ Discussion 11 RECOMMENDATION: As requested by the City Council, the following is a rough draft of a statement of purpose for the proposed Blue Ribbon Committee: Purpose The Blue Ribbon Committee has been established by the City Council to serve as an advisory committee for the purpose of reviewing, evaluating and making recommendations regarding: • the defined needs and priority for new and/or improved park and recreation facilities. • the defined park and recreation facility needs that should be met by means of a special election referendum. • the new and/or improved park and recreation facilities included in the current proposed plan. • the need to add, delete and/or relocate park and recreation facilities within the current proposal. • the need and strategy to improve existing School District recreational facilities. • the need and strategy to develop additional recreational facilities on School District property. It is the City Council's desire to have the Blue Ribbon Committee's final recommendations presented to the City Council at the Tuesday, December 19, 2000, City Council meeting. •� \JV • REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item III.H. From: ERIC ANDERSON Consent ❑ ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER Information Only ❑ Date: JULY 189, 2000 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: ANTENNA REQUEST: ® Motion SPRINT SPECTRUM - FIRE 0 El Resolution DEPARTMENT - 6250 TRACY ❑ Ordinance ® Discussion RECOMMENDATION: Approve project concept subject to variance approval by Zoning Board and instruct staff to develop lease with Sprint Spectrum. INFORMATION/BACKGROUND: Staff has worked with Sprint Spectrum to develop a proposal for co- locating antennas on the existing monopole at Fire Station #1 (6250 Tracy Avenue). Sprint would install 6 antennas (3 groups of 2) below the existing antennas on the monopole behind the fire station. As with their past lease, they would like the option to locate 3 additional antennas in the future'(in- between the existing groups of 2). When the monopole was built in 1994, Airtouch added to the back of the fire station and built the department a separate garage stall to contain equipment and lumber needed for special rescue operations. Sprint would like to use this garage stall for their ground equipment and build us a new garage stall. The Fire Department would like a larger REPORT/RECOMMENDATION = Antenna Request: Sprint Spectrum Fire Department 6250 Tracy Avenue July 18, 2000 Page two garage stall built in order to have the equipment loaded on a trailer for quick response to structural collapse rescue calls. Under current conditions, the department needs to load thousands of pounds of lumber on to a trailer before we can respond to a call because the existing stall is too small for a trailer. NSP will donate a trailer to the department and Sprint would build the larger stall. Under the terms of the agreement, the City would agree to waive the lease payment for the additional square footage we would require with the new stall. The addition to the building would be block wall with electrical and matching brick on the exterior. In order to construct this addition, we would require a variance for the rear setback. The addition would have a 22 foot rear setback as opposed to the 50 foot requirement. We would recommend the Council add a condition to the approval that Sprint get approval for the variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals before proceeding with development of a lease. The alternative to this concept would be to have Sprint locate a new monopole somewhere in the vicinity of highway 62 and Tracy. Staff believes this is a better proposal so we minimize. the number of towers and save capital plan dollars relative to new construction at the Fire Department. Staff will have a presentation providing photographs of the site, diagrams of proposed structural changes and proposed lease terms. As with our water tower leases, Sprint will be required to pay for an interference study to ensure their installation does not interfere with our public safety radio systems or the existing tenant on the monopole. COUNCIL CHECK h— aISTER 12 -JUL -2000 (_ .9) page 1 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM--- - - - - -- OBJECT-- - - - -PO -NUM ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 212123 07/18/00 $288.13 A.M. LEONARD LANDSCAPE FABRIC 01593083 GRANDVIEW REVO GENERAL SUPPLI 1848 < *> $288.13* 212124 07/18/00 $3,155.11 AAA PLATES, EXCISE, ETC F 062700 EQUIPMENT OPER LIC & PERMITS < *> $3,155.11* 212125 07/18/00 $4,326.09 AAA TITLE, PLATES, EXCISE 06/27 EQUIPMENT OPER LIC & PERMITS < *> $4,326.09* 212126 07/18/00 $8.50 AAA TABS FOR 26.181 .062300 EQUIPMENT OPER LIC & PERMITS < *> $8.50* 212127 07/18/00 $8.50 AAA TABS FOR 26.192 070300 EQUIPMENT OPER LIC & PERMITS < *> $8.50* 212128 07/18/00 $124.59 ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY VAN MAT 056139 -0 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 1812 < *> $124.59* 212129 07/18/00 $149.21 ACE SUPPLY PIPE, VENT, FLASHING 296982 BUILDINGS REPAIR PARTS 1855 < *> $149.21* 212130 07/18/00 $26,400.00 Acoustic Associates RUBBER SKATE TILE & V 102693 ICE ARENA PROG MACH. & EQUIP 7078 < *> $26,400.00* 212131 07/18/00 $382.80 ACTION MAILING SERVICES MAIL SERVICE 85418 GENERAL(BILLIN PROF SERVICES < *> $382.80* 212132 07/18/00 $311.93 ADAMS, LUCILLE AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 070300 GENERAL FD PRO AMBULANCE FEES < *> $311.93* 212133 07/18/00 $128.94 ADVANCED GRAPHICS SYSTEM PRINTER REPAIR 029169 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP MAINT 3068 < *> $128.94* 212134 07/18/00 $448.26 AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES CONCRETE 1138855 STREET RENOVAT CONCRETE 5998 07/18/00 $224.13 AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES CONCRETE 1138856 STREET RENOVAT CONCRETE 5998 07/18/00 $221.41 AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES CONCRETE 1139426 STREET RENOVAT CONCRETE 5998 07/18/00 $387.48 AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES READY -MIX 1140291 STREET RENOVAT CONCRETE 1766 < *> $1,281.28* 212135 07/18/00 $117.00 ALEXANDER, PETE SOFTBALL UMPIRE 071000 EDINA ATHLETIC PROF SERVICES < *> $117.00* 212136 07/18/00 $106.65 ALL SAINTS BRANDS COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 00021198 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 07/18/00 $379.10 ALL SAINTS BRANDS COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 00021199 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 07/18/00 $36.80 ALL SAINTS BRANDS COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 00021243 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 07/18/00 $68.90 ALL SAINTS BRANDS COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 00021305 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 07/18/00 $233.00 ALL SAINTS BRANDS COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 00021350 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 07/18/00 $65.00 ALL SAINTS BRANDS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 00021380 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $889.45* 212137 07/18/00 $724.79 ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO VIDEO EQUIPMENT INV29687 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP REPLACEM 3181 < *> $724.79* 212138 07/18/00 $14.95 AMERICAN POLICE BEAT SUBSCRIPTION 070500 POLICE DEPT. G DUES & SUBSCRI < *> $14.95* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 12 -JUL -2000 ,(15:29) page 2 HECK NO ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 212139 07/18/00 $159.72 AMUNDSON, ERIK CELL PHONE REIMBURSEM 070500 PATROL TELEPHONE < *> $159.72* 212140 07/18/00 $869.26 ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS INC PORTABLE RADIO 51258 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLI 1610 07/18/00 ,$79.55 ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS INC MICROPHONES 24326 EQUIPMENT OPER RADIO SERVICE 1795 . < *> $948.81* 212141 07/18/00 $400.00 ANOKA - HENNEPIN TECHNICAL VENTILATION TRAINING 00007297 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $400.00* 212142 07/18/00 $243.00 APCO SPRING CONFERENCE 070300 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS 3194 < *> $243.00* 212143 07/18/00 - $57.20 APPERT'S FOODSERVICE FOOD 660213C GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6065 07/18/00 $666.87 APPERT'S FOODSERVICE FOOD 663063 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6065 07/18/00 $194.46 APPERT'S FOODSERVICE PAPER GOODS 663063 GRILL GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $804.13* 212144 07/18/00 $8.78 ARCH PAGING PAGER FOR VINCE 070100 PARK MAINTENAN TELEPHONE 1952 < *> $8.78* 212145 07/18/00 $54.00 ASHWORTH INC. SHIRTS 701249 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6212 < *> $54.00* 212146 07/18/00 $12.40 ASPEN ENVIRONMENTAL RESTROOM RENTAL 10678 BUILDING MAINT PROF SERVICES 1761 07/18/00 $54.59 ASPEN ENVIRONMENTAL RESTROOM RENTAL 11300 TREES & MAINTE PROF SERVICES 1970 07/18/00 $109.17 ASPEN ENVIRONMENTAL PORTABLES 11301 MAINT OF COURS RUBBISH REMOVA 6041 07/18/00 $54.59 ASPEN ENVIRONMENTAL RESTROOM RENTAL 11302 TREES & MAINTE PROF SERVICES 1970 07/18/00 $54.59 ASPEN ENVIRONMENTAL RESTROOM RENTAL 11303 TREES & MAINTE PROF SERVICES 1970 < *> $285.34* 212147 07/18/00 $3,629.52 ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO. SANDERS 1136001 EQUIPMENT REPL EQUIP REPLACEM 1639 07/18/00 $171.51 ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO. WATER SYSTEM KIT 518251 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1648 < *> $3,801.03* 212149 07/18/00 $141.27 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS RUBBISH REMOVAL 070100 CITY HALL GENE RUBBISH REMOVA 07/18/00 $332.02 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS RUBBISH REMOVAL 070100 GENERAL MAINT RUBBISH REMOVA 07/18/00 $332.01 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS RUBBISH REMOVAL 070100 PW BUILDING RUBBISH REMOVA 07/18/00 $95.61 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS RUBBISH REMOVAL 070100 FIRE DEPT. GEN RUBBISH REMOVA 07/18/00 $21.70 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS RUBBISH REMOVAL 070100 FIRE SUPPLIES RUBBISH REMOVA 07/18/00 $411.09 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS RUBBISH REMOVAL 070100 ARENA.BLDG /GRO RUBBISH REMOVA 07/18/00 $269.58 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS RUBBISH REMOVAL 070100 MAINT OF COURS RUBBISH REMOVA 07/18/00 $241.37 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS RUBBISH REMOVAL 070100 LITTER REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVA 07/18/00 $478.40 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS RUBBISH REMOVAL 070100 CLUB HOUSE RUBBISH REMOVA 07/18/00 $43.40 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS RUBBISH REMOVAL 070100 ART CENTER BLD RUBBISH REMOVA 07/18/00 $101.26 ASPEN.WASTE SYSTEMS RUBBISH REMOVAL 070100 LITTER REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVA 07/18/00 $322.89 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS RUBBISH REMOVAL 070100 POOL OPERATION RUBBISH REMOVA 07/18/00 $681.45 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS RUBBISH REMOVAL 070100 ED BUILDING & RUBBISH REMOVA 07/18/00 $76.40 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS RUBBISH REMOVAL 070100 VERNON OCCUPAN RUBBISH REMOVA 07/18/00 $67.39 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS RUBBISH REMOVAL 070100 YORK OCCUPANCY RUBBISH REMOVA 07/18/00 $23.99 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS RUBBISH REMOVAL 070100 50TH ST OCCUPA RUBBISH REMOVA 07/18/00 $163.06 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS RUBBISH REMOVAL 070100 LITTER REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVA 07/18/00 $45.80 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS RUBBISH REMOVAL 070100 FRED RICHARDS RUBBISH REMOVA < *> $3,848.69* COUNCIL CHECK .__SISTER 12 -JUL -2000 (. .9) page 3 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM--- - - - - -- OBJECT-- - - - -PO NUM --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 212150 07/18/00 $52.05 AUGIE'S INC. FOOD 244 FRED RICHARDS COST OF GD SOL 6324 07/18/00 $73.32 AUGIE'S INC. SANDWICHES 389 FRED RICHARDS COST OF GD SOL 6324 07/18/00 $61.98 AUGIE'S INC. FOOD 504 FRED RICHARDS COST OF GD SOL 6324 07/18/00 $36.42 AUGIE'S INC. SANDWICHES 525 FRED RICHARDS COST OF GD SOL 6324 < *> $223.77* 212151 07/18/00 $380.80 BACHMAN'S GENERAL SUPPLIES 062000 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/00 $32.55 BACHMAN'S TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUB 062000 CENTENNIAL LAK TREES FLWR SHR 07/18/00 $115.77 BACHMAN'S GENERAL SUPPLIES 062000 POOL TRACK GRE GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/00 $208.62 BACHMAN'S PLANTINGS & TREES 062000 TREES & MAINTE PLANT & TREES 07/18/00 $151.01 BACHMAN'S GENERAL SUPPLIES 062000 STREET REVOLVI GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $888.75* 212152 07/18/00 $1,932.04 BANC OF AMERICA COMMERCI CLOTHES 13709 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6421 < *> $1,932.04* 212153 07/18/00 $149.80 BANNER ROOFING DUPLICATE PERMIT 062900 GENERAL FD PRO BUILDING PERMI < *> $149.80* 212154 07/18/00 $1,397.50 BARR ENGINEERING CO. BRAEMAR TRAIL ALIGNME 2327354 - MAINT OF COURS PROF SERVICES 07/18/00 $2,229.94 BARR ENGINEERING CO. PAMELA PARK IMPROVEME 2327354- PAMELA PK /LK S CIP 07/18/00 $180.00 BARR ENGINEERING CO. COUNTRY CLUB AREA 2327354- STORM SEWER CIP < *> $3,807.44* 212155 07/18/00 $47.89 BATTERIES PLUS BATTERIES /SPOTLIGHT F5 -30476 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI 3052 07/18/00 $63.89 BATTERIES PLUS BATTERY F51 -1812 PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPLI 1799 07/18/00 $39.87 BATTERIES PLUS BATTERIES F5 -33742 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1849 07/18/00 $54.96 BATTERIES PLUS BATTERIES F5 -34714 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI 3088 07/18/00 $42.94 BATTERIES PLUS BATTERIES F5 -34799 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI 3089 < *> $249.55* 212156 07/18/00 $521.04 BATTERY WHOLESALE INC. BATTERIES 09689 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 1818 < *> $521.04* 212157 07/18/00 $146.34 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 32073700 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/00 $107.99 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 32154400 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $254.33* 212158 07/18/00 $1,578.33 BEMAR SALES CORP. FAN 04030 EQUIPMENT OPER EQUIP REPLACEM 1320 < *> $1,578.33* 212160 07/18/00 $143.76 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 7764010 POLICE DEPT. G OFFICE SUPPLIE 3069 07/18/00 $127.76 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT CRAFT SUPPLIES 7769080 MEDIA LAB CRAFT SUPPLIES 9066 07/18/00 $28.74 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT PLATFORM 7777070 DISTRIBUTION REPAIR PARTS 1781 07/18/00 $13.58 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 7784780 POLICE DEPT. G OFFICE SUPPLIE 3076 07/18/00 $35.72 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT KEYBOARD MANAGER, COV 7787260 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 1830 07/18/00 $27.24 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT INK CARTRIDGE 7791350 POLICE DEPT. G OFFICE SUPPLIE 3076 07/18/00 $31.77 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT COMPUTER COVER 7787261 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 1830 07/18/00 $15.34 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT HIGHLIGHTERS, MARKERS 7796190 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 1850 07/18/00 - $32.29 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES CMR31182 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/00 $42.13 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT MONITOR COVER, PLATFO 7800790 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 1858 07/18/00 $47.86 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 7803490 FINANCE GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/00 $62.62 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 7803490 ELECTION GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/00 $79.88 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 7803490 INSPECTIONS GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/00 $186.88 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 7803490 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 12 -JUL -2000 (15:29) page 4 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE. PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM -----------------------------------------------------.----------------------------.--------------------------------------------------- 212160 07/18/00 $15.88 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT MONITOR COVER 7800420 ST LIGHTING OR GENERAL SUPPLI 1858 07/18/00 $24.53 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT SCRATCH PADS, COVER .7818130 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 1884 07/18/00 $19.95 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCT OFFICE SUPPLIES 7824750 ELECTION GENERAL SUPPLI 19.95 < *> $871.35* 212161 07/18/00 $354.11 BEST ACCESS SYSTEMS OF M CORE KEYED, PADLOCKS MN119083 BUILDING MAINT REPAIR PARTS 5755 < *> $354.11* 212162 07/18/00 $6.00 BEUTELL,, KARI PROGRAM REFUND 070300 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F < *> $6.00* 212163 07/18/00 $265.29 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS ASPHALT 80014 STREET RENOVAT BLACKTOP 5994 07/18/00 $97.00 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS ASPHALT 80034 GENERAL MAINT BLACKTOP 5994 < *> $362.29* 212164 07/18/00 $78.00 BLACK, STEVE SOFTBALL UMPIRE 071000 EDINA ATHLETIC PROF SERVICES < *> $78.00* 212165 07/18/00 $956.55 BLOOMINGTON GARDEN CTR & FLOWERS 2462 MAINT OF COURS COURSE BEAUTIF 6369 07/18/00 $430.17 BLOOMINGTON GARDEN CTR & FLOWERS 2463 MAINT OF COURS COURSE BEAUTIF 6457 07/18/00 $952.43 BLOOMINGTON GARDEN CTR & FLOWERS 2464 MAINT OF COURS COURSE BEAUTIF 6430 < *> $2,339.15* 212166 07/18/00 $108.00 BONNELL, BARBARA CLASS REFUND 062300 ART CNTR PROG REGISTRATION F < *> $108.00* 212167 07/18/00 $80.12 BOYER TRUCK PARTS CAP, L /END, R /END 154804 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1620 07/18/00 $102.75 BOYER TRUCK PARTS DIESEL CONDITIONER 155362 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1670 07/18/00 - $465.94 BOYER TRUCK PARTS CREDIT MEMO 151949CR EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1398 07/18/00 $185.98 BOYER TRUCK PARTS BRACKET 159266 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1642 07/18/00 $47.66 BOYER TRUCK PARTS BRACKET 159376 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1642 07/18/00 $577.26 BOYER TRUCK PARTS REMAN MOTO 160450 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1805 07/18/00 $30.19 BOYER TRUCK PARTS SWITCH ASSEMBLY 162634 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1816 < *> $558.02* 212168 07/18/00 $16.99 BRAEMAR PRINTING STAMP 54026 GOLF ADMINISTR OFFICE SUPPLIE 6103 < *> $16.99* 212169 07/18/00 $78..00 BRAKKE, KEITH SOFTBALL UMPIRE 071000 EDINA ATHLETIC PROF SERVICES < *> $78.00* 212170 07/18/00 $6.00 Brand, Bethany FIELD TRIP REFUND 070700 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F < *> $6.00* 212171 07/18/00 $26.00 BRAUER, JULIE TENNIS REFUND 070500 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F < *> $26.00* 212172 07/18/00 - $12.00 BRISSMAN - KENNEDY INC. CREDIT - VAC PICKUP CM626890 CITY HALL GENE CLEANING SUPPL 07/18/00 - $52.12 BRISSMAN - KENNEDY INC. CREDIT - LABOR, FILTER CM627598 CITY HALL GENE CLEANING SUPPL 07/18/00 $172.11 BRISSMAN - KENNEDY INC. BOWL CLEANER; RAGS 632917 BUILDING-MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 1735 < *> $107.99* 212173 07/18/00 $58.61 BROWN, BARBARA B.. AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 070300 GENERAL FD PRO AMBULANCE FEES < *> $58.61* 12 -JUL -2000 (. L9) page 5 COUNCIL CHECK — ,4ISTER CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM - - - - -- --- - - -- - - -_PO - -_- OBJECT NUM ------------------ 212174 - 07/18/00 - - - -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- $37,935.20 BROWNING FERRIS INDUSTRI RECYCLING 7000078- RECYCLING Recycling C ar < *> $37,935.20* 212175 07/18/00 $5,378.84 BROWNING FERRIS INDUSTRI REFUSE 1093657- 50TH STREET RU PROF SERVICES < *> $5,378.84* 212176 07/18/00 $460.91 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC. INFIELD AG -LIME 063000 FIELD MAINTENA INFIELD MIX 1182 < *> $460.91* 212177 07/18/00 $65.00 BUDGET PROJECTOR REPAIR CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1163 MEDIA LAB CONTR REPAIRS 9058 < *> $65.00* 212178 07/18/00 $166.40 CALLAHAN, FRAN MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 070500 PUBLIC HEALTH MILEAGE < *> $166.40* 212179 07/18/00 $634.50 CAMPBELL GROUP, THE UNIFORM PARK SHIRTS 22139 POOL TRACK GRE LAUNDRY 2294 < *> $634.50* 212180 07/18/00 $363.65 CARLSON MARKETING GROUP VOLUNTEER SHIRTS 1032570 SPECIAL ACTIVI GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $363.65* 212181 07/18/00 $141.61 CASH REGISTER SALES REGISTER PAPER 865123 865636 GOLF ADMINISTR ART CENTER ADM OFFICE SUPPLIE EQUIP REPLACEM 6093 7701 07/18/00 $699.60 CASH REGISTER SALES CASH REGISTER < *> $841.21* 212182 07/18/00 $523.19 CATCO HOSE & FITTINGS 3 -34167 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1808 07/18/00 $21.83 CATCO GAUGE 81 -25170 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1817 < *> $545.02* 212183 07/18/00 $151.30 CHET'S SHOES INC. WORK BOOTS #57 8563 FIRE DEPT. GEN UNIF ALLOW 3868 < *> $151.30* 212184 07/18/00 $46.44 CIT GROUP /COMMERCIAL SER MERCHANDISE 151303 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6434 07/18/00 $169.25 CIT GROUP /COMMERCIAL SER CLOTHES 00159071 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6434 07/18/00 $36.21 CIT GROUP /COMMERCIAL SER SHORTS 159970 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6227 < *> $251.90* 212185 07/18/00 $5,000.00 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON TOBACCO FREE COMMUNIT YD6210 TOBACCO GRANT PROF SERVICES < *> $5,000.00* 212186 07/18/00 $159.50 CITY OF RICHFIELD LIGHT & POWER 9602301 GENERAL STORM LIGHT & POWER < *> $159.50* 212187 07/18/00 $310.00 CITY OF ST. PAUL VIOLENT ENCOUNTER CLA 064206 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $310.00* 212188 07/18/00 $93.75 CLARK PRODUCTS INC. CANDY V343023 POOL CONCESSIO COST OF GD SOL 07/18/00 $164.32 CLARK PRODUCTS INC. CANDY V343567 POOL CONCESSIO COST OF GD SOL 07/18/00 $70.20 CLARK PRODUCTS INC. CANDY V343786 POOL CONCESSIO COST OF GD SOL < *> $328.27* 212189 07/18/00 $369.70 CLEVELAND GOLF GOLF CLUBS 495510SO PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6218 < *> $369.70* 212190 07/18/00 $151.27 COBRA GOLF CLUBS 3067405 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6210 2OUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 12 -JUL -2000 (15:29) page 6 HECK NO -- DATE -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------7---------------------------- CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM <*> $151.27* 212191 07/18/00 $793.75 COLLIER METAL SPECIALTIE TREE RINGS 081721 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI 2061 < *> $793.75* 212192 07/18/00 $79.88 COMMERCIAL FURNITURE BRO REMODELING 00716314 CITY HALL EQUIP REPLACEM 4816 07/18/00 $76.80 COMMERCIAL FURNITURE BRO REMODELING 00070487 CITY HALL EQUIP REPLACEM 4815 < *> $156.68* 212193 07/18/00 $324.43 COMMERCIAL POOL & SPA SU CHLORINE 0111268- POOL TRACK GRE CHEMICALS 2101 < *> $324.43* 212194 07/18/00 $15.44 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS EYE WASH 01263448 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 1769 07/18/00 $198.96 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS GLOVES, EAR PLUGS, EA 01268543 PUMP & LIFT ST SAFETY EQUIPME 1854 07/18/00 $160.79 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS GLOVES, RESPIRATORS 01274320 EQUIPMENT OPER SAFETY EQUIPME 1885 < *> $375.19* 212195 07/18/00 $21.63 CORPORATE EXPRESS DELIVE COURIER 135343 CONTINGENCIES PROF SERVICES 4812 < *> $21.63* 212196 07/18/00 $692.25 CRITTER CONTROL APPLIED REPELLENT 37860 BUILDING MAINT PROF SERVICES 1954 < *> $692.25* 212197 07/18/00 $426.24 CY'S UNIFORMS UNIFORM - GORSHE 051511 UTILITY PROG UNIF ALLOW 3872 07/18/00 $66.32 CY'S UNIFORMS UNIFORM - HADZIMA 051810 UTILITY PROG UNIF ALLOW 3867 07/18/00 $84.35 CY'S UNIFORMS BADGES - SKATRUD 052721 UTILITY PROG • UNIF ALLOW 3846 < *> $576.91* 212198 07/18/00 $194.58 DANKO EMERGENCY EQUIPMEN HEAVY FIRE BOOTS 326472 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLI 1364 07/18/00 $99.32 DANKO EMERGENCY EQUIPMEN FIRE BOOTS 326943 FIRE DEPT. GEN PROTECT CLOTHI 3855 < *> $293.90* 212199 07/18/00 $342.20 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 100445 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 07/18/00 $3,652.40 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 100682 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 07/18/00 $49.80 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 100683 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/00 $56.00 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 100684 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/00 $1,849.12 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 100685 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 07/18/00 $2,118.05 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 101180 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 07/18/00 $1,847.50 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 61778 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 07/18/00 $2,957.60 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 7030001 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 07/18/00 $69.40 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 70574 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/00 $18.40 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 101486 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/00 $2,865.20 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 101487 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 07/18/00 $1,316.20 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 101727 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE < *> $17,141.87* 212200 07/18/00 $399.53 DELEGARD TOOL CO. SHORT JACK, PULLER, G 45253 EQUIPMENT OPER TOOLS 1804 07/18/00 $6.22 DELEGARD TOOL CO. WRENCH 45361 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1804 < *> $405.75* 212201 07/18/00 $50.31 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKEREY BAKERY 35987 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6329 07/18/00 $68.32 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKEREY BAKERY 35988 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6329 07/18/00 $49.19 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKEREY BAKERY 36145 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6329 07/18/00 $42.37 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKEREY BAKERY 36146 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6329 07/18/00 $156.91 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKEREY BAKERY 36147 -GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6329 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 12 -JUL -2000 (- .29) page 7 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM - -- - - - OBJECT PO NUM _ 212201 07/18/00 $60.64 --------------------------------------------------------------- DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKEREY BAKERY 36148 36390 GRILL GRILL ST O COST OF GD COST OF GD SOL 6329 SOL 6329 07/18/00 $28.69 DENNYS 5TH DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKEREY BAKERY AVE. BAKEREY BAKERY 36403 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6329 07/18/00 07/18/00 $18.76 $69.08 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKEREY BAKERY 36449 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6329 < *> $544.27* 212203 07/18/00 $139.57 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRA TELEPHONE W0005064 W0005064 SKATING & HOCK COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 07/18/00 $15.35 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRA TELEPHONE OF ADMINISTRA TELEPHONE W0005064 50TH ST OCCUPA TELEPHONE 07/18/00 07/18/00 $60.22 $90.16 DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRA TELEPHONE W0005064 YORK OCCUPANCY TELEPHONE 07/18/00 $60.04 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRA TELEPHONE W0005064 W0005064 VERNON OCCUPAN BUILDING MAINT TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 07/18/00 $45.03 $15.01 DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRA TELEPHONE OF ADMINISTRA TELEPHONE W0005064 BUILDING MAINT TELEPHONE 07/18/00 07/18/00 $15.01 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRA TELEPHONE W0005064 BUILDING MAINT TELEPHONE 07/18/00 $29.16 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRA TELEPHONE W0005064 BUILDING MAINT TELEPHONE 07/18/00 $30.02 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRA TELEPHONE W0005064 W0005064 SENIOR CITIZEN POOL OPERATION TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 07/18/00 $48.12 $89.63 DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRA TELEPHONE OF ADMINISTRA TELEPHONE W0005064 YORK FIRE STAT TELEPHONE 07/18/00 07/18/00 $75.05 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRA TELEPHONE W0005064 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE 07/18/00 $110.39 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRA TELEPHONE W0005064 W0005064 ART CENTER BLD ED ADMINISTRAT TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 07/18/00 07/18/00 $245.03 $14.58 DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRA TELEPHONE OF ADMINISTRA TELEPHONE W0005064 ARENA BLDG /GRO TELEPHONE 07/18/00 $79.76 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRA TELEPHONE W0005064 W0005065 GOLF DOME CLUB HOUSE_ TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 07/18/00 $84.59 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRA PU LINE < *> $1,246.72* 212204 07/18/00 212205 07/18/00 212206 07/18/00 212207 07/18/00 212208 07/18/00 07/18/00 212209 07/18/00 212210 07/18/00 212211 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 212212 07/18/00 $159.72 DESHLER, BRANDON $159.72* $106.50 DESQ $106.50* $537.51 DEXTER SHOE COMPANY $537.51* $282.54 DOALL TWIN CITIES CO $282.54* $344.50 DON BETZEN GOLF CO. $98.00 DON BETZEN GOLF CO. $442.50* $64.95 DON'S APPLIANCE INC. $64.95* $56.00 DORRIAN, SARAH $56.00* REIMBURSEMENT FOR CEL 070500 PATROL TELEPHONE LOCK INSTALLATIONS SHOES INSERT ASSEMBLY TEES MERCHANDISE 01 -2689 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONTR REPAIRS 3845 242601 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6213 23007640 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 1631 11279 11338 SERVICE CALL - DISHWA S45821 UNIFORM REIMBURSEMENT 062600 $305.49 DPC INDUSTRIES CHEMICALS $1,264.79 DPC INDUSTRIES POLY PHOSPHATE F -35 $239.86 DPC INDUSTRIES CHEMICALS $1,810.14* $54.00 DRIVER & VEHICLE SERVICE RENEWAL TABS $54.00* PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6215 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6215 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONTR REPAIRS POOL CONCESSIO LAUNDRY 7000 -136 POOL OPERATION CHEMICALS 1549 7000 -136 WATER TREATMEN WATER TRTMT SU 7000 -136 POOL OPERATION CHEMICALS 062600 EQUIPMENT OPER LIC & PERMITS =NCIL CHECK REGISTER 12 -JUL -2000 (15:29) page 8 :HECK NO ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------=----------------------------------- DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 212213 07/18/00 $316.05 DRUMMOND AM CORP. MIRAGE /PRIZM 5064748 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI 2057 07/18/00 $143.76 DRUMMOND AM CORP. OUTLAST 5066836 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 1403 < *> $459.81* 212214 07/18/00 $23.33 E -Z -GO TEXTRON REPAIR PARTS 0551697 GOLF CARS REPAIR PARTS 6359 07/18/00 $521.92 E -Z -GO TEXTRON CART REPAIR PARTS 0552561 GOLF CARS REPAIR PARTS 6359 < *> $545.25* 212215 07/18/00 $678.72 EAGLE WINE COST OF.GOODS SOLD WI 232688 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 07/18/00 $1,222:61 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 234215 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 07/18/00 $812.66 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 234221 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 07/18/00 $3,586.40 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 234226 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 07/18/00 - $114.67 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 540125 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 07/18/00 $854.35 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 236765 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 07/18/00 $68.60 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 236768 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 07/18/00 $856.46 ' EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 236769 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 07/18/00 $147.45 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 238425 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $8,112.58* 212216 07/18/00 $38.40 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 644526 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 07/18/00 $75.00 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE BEER 645603 GRILL CST OF GDS BEE 6330 07/18/00 $1,972.35 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 647629 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 07/18/00 $7,552.10 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 647630 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/00 $39.30 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 647631 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/00 $27.15 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF .GOODS SOLD MI 647977 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/00 $9,876.35 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COSVOF GOODS SOLD BE 648231 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 07/18/00 $45.25 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 648232 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/00 $1,997.35 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 650725 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 07/18/00 $1,511.90 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 650728 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 07/18/00 $2,382.60 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 651270 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE < *> $25,517.75* 212217 07/18/00 $75.00 ECCLES, RON CLINICS 3278 CENTENNIAL LAK PROF SERVICES 07/18/00 $150.00 ECCLES, RON CLINICS 3279 CENTENNIAL LAK PROF SERVICES 07/18/00 $150.00 ECCLES, RON WICKET REPLACEMENTS 3280 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI 2056 < *> $375.00* 212218 *> 07/18/00 $106.29 ECOLAB PEST ELIMINATION SPRAY FOR BUGS 6900775 POOL TRACK GRE SVC CONTR EQUI CONTRACT < $106.29* 212219 07/18/00 $241.95 EDWARD KRAEMER & SONS IN ROCK FOR PATHS 16288 MAINT OF COURS.SAND,GRVL & RO 6362 < *> $241.95* 212220 07/18/00 $916.00 EKLUND TREE RECYCLING TREE WASTE DISPOSAL 060100 TREES & MAINTE RUBBISH REMOVA 1713 07/18/00 $575.00 EKLUND TREE RECYCLING TREE WASTE DISPOSAL 060100 MAINT OF COURS RUBBISH REMOVA 1428 07/18/00 $575.00 EKLUND TREE RECYCLING TREE WASTE DISPOSAL 060100 CENTENNIAL LAK RUBBISH REMOVA 1431 07/18/00 $750.00 EKLUND TREE RECYCLING MULCH 060100 GRANDVIEW REVO GENERAL SUPPLI 1738 < *> $2,816.00* 212221 07/18/00 $924.21 ELECTRIC SERVICE CO. CIVIL DEFENSE SERVICE 116185 CIVIL DEFENSE PROF SERVICES 07/18/00 - $236.90 ELECTRIC SERVICE CO. CREDIT MEMO 116205 CIVIL DEFENSE PROF SERVICES 07/18/00 $658.67 ELECTRIC SERVICE CO. INSTALLED GFI RECEPTA 116258 CENTENNIAL LAK CONTR REPAIRS 2055 < *> $1,345.98* 212222 07/18/00 $450.00 ELLIOTT'S TOWING VEHICLE TOWING 062900 FIRE DEPT. GEN PROF SERVICES COUNCIL CHECK iSTER 12 -JUL -2000 (_ .9) page 9 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <*> $450.00* 212223 07/18/00 $36,116.33 ENCOMM MIDWEST LLC PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 8 071800 UTILITY PROG CIP < *> $36,116.33* 212224 07/18/00 $241.80 EQUIPMENT SUPPLY INC. CONTRACTED REPAIR 180083 POOL OPERATION CONTR REPAIRS 07/18/00 $175.00 EQUIPMENT SUPPLY INC. CONTRACTED REPAIR 180557 POOL OPERATION CONTR REPAIRS 07/18/00 $95.00 EQUIPMENT SUPPLY INC. CONTRACTED REPAIR 180558 POOL OPERATION CONTR REPAIRS 07/18/00 $215.00 EQUIPMENT SUPPLY INC. CONTRACTED REPAIR 180628 POOL OPERATION CONTR REPAIRS < *> $726.80* 212225 07/18/00 $127.80 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC. ADJUSTABLE RINGS CC2223 PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPLI 1835 < *> $127.80* 212226 07/18/00 $37.00 ETTINGER, SUSAN TENNIS LESSON REFUND 070700 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F < *> $37.00* 212227 07/18/00 $429.30 EVERGREEN LAND SERVICES EASEMENT ACQUISITION 00 -731 SANITARY SEWER CIP 07/18/00 $1,744.95 EVERGREEN LAND SERVICES EASEMENT ACQUISITION 00 -732 TH100 & W 77TH CIP < *> $2,174.25* 212228 07/18/00 $280.46 EXPERIAN MPLS DIRECTORY RENTAL 0119818- POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP RENTAL < *> $280.46* 212229 07/18/00 $2,384.00 EXPERT T BILLING JUNE SERVICES 070500 FIRE DEPT. GEN PROF SERVICES < *> $2,384.00* 212230 07/18/00 $23,195.20 F.F. JEDLICKI INC. PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 071800 DAKOTA LIFT ST CIP < *> $23,195.20* 212231 07/18/00 $165.20 FAIRVIEW SOUTHDALE HOSPI EDINBOROUGH PARK INCI 063000 ED ADMINISTRAT PROF SERVICES < *> $165.20* 212232 07/18/00 $37.00 FIELDS, KRISTEN TENNIS LESSON REFUND 062700 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F < *> $37.00* 212233 07/18/00 $639.96 FISHER SCIENTIFIC LAB SUPPLIES 5779068 LABORATORY GENERAL SUPPLI 1879 < *> $639.96* 212234 07/18/00 $3,209.54 FLANAGAN SALES PLANTERS 9156 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI 2094 < *> $3,209.54* 212235 07/18/00 $43.28 FLOWERS OF EDINA FLOWERS 2811 GOLF ADMINISTR GENERAL SUPPLI 6072 < *> $43.28* 212236 07/18/00 $97.52 FOOTJOY SHOES 3727824 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6210 07/18/00 $121.56 FOOTJOY SHOES 3782988 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6210 07/18/00 $63.66 FOOTJOY SHOES 3783360 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6210 07/18/00 $49.54 FOOTJOY SHOES 3819809 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6210 < *> $332.28* 212237 07/18/00 $317.67 FORMS GROUP, THE OFFICE FORMS 00002842 POLICE DEPT. G PRINTING 3085 07/18/00 $384.42 FORMS GROUP, THE OFFICE FORMS 00002843 POLICE DEPT. G PRINTING 3084 < *> $702.09* :OUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 12 -JUL -2000 (15:29) page 10 :HECK NO ---------------------------------'--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 212238 07/18/00 $213.68 FORRESTER'S RAINSUITS 0100799- PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6214 < *> $213.68* 212239 07/18/00 $250.00 FRANDRUD, ANGELA SKATING INSTRUCTOR 070600 POOL TRACK GRE PROF SERVICES < *> $250.00* 212240 07/18/00 $186.38 FREEWAY DODGE INC. TWO -WAY RADIO REPAIR 47367DOW EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1326 07/18/00 $235.64 FREEWAY DODGE INC. PANEL HOOD 47377DOW EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1323 < *> $422.02* 212241 07/18/00 $29.35 FREUND, JEFF PARK BORDERS FOR FRON 062900 POOL TRACK GRE GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/00 $128.70 FREUND, JEFF MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 063000 ED ADMINISTRAT MILEAGE < *> $158.05* 212242 07/18/00 $37.00 FROATS, JENNIFER TENNIS LESSON REFUND 070700 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F < *> $37.00* 212243 07/18/00 $49.20 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 063000 ARENA BLDG /GRO LAUNDRY 07/18/00 $39.00 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 063000 CITY HALL GENE LAUNDRY 07/18/00 $51.80 G & K SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES 063000 STREET REVOLVI GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/00 $211.58 G & K. SERVICES CLEANING SUPPLIES 063000 PW BUILDING CLEANING SUPPL 07/18/00 $104.55 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 063000 PUMP & LIFT ST LAUNDRY 07/18/00 $238.96 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 063000 EQUIPMENT OPER LAUNDRY 07/18/00 $624.95 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 063000 GENERAL MAINT LAUNDRY 07/18/00 $245.23 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 063000 BUILDING MAINT LAUNDRY < *> $1,565.27* 212244 07/18/00 $28.95 GALLS INC. RECORDER CASES 54095428 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI 3067 < *> $28.95* 212245 07/18/00 $110.00 GARDEN & ASSOCIATES INC INTREPRETOR SERVICES 7216 POLICE DEPT. G PROF SERVICES < *.> $110.00* 212246 07/18/00 $907.71 GARTNER REFRIGERATION & CHANGED OIL FILTERS 2627 POOL TRACK GRE CONTR REPAIRS 2293 07/18/00 $973.58 GARTNER REFRIGERATION & INSTALL FAN, CHECKED 2707 POOL TRACK GRE CONTR REPAIRS 2102 < *> $1,881.29* 212247 07/18/00 $24.69 GE CAPITAL ITS MOUSE 90846362 ENGINEERING GE GENERAL SUPPLI 4776 < *> $24.69* 212248 07/18/00 $111.90 GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY REFRIGERATOR CHECK -UP 070100 CITY HALL GENE CONTR REPAIRS < *> $111.90* 212249 07/18/00 $115.00- GENERAL SPORTS CORPORATI CONCESSION WORKER SHI 56032 EDINA ATHLETIC COST OF GD SOL 07/18/00 $79.72 GENERAL SPORTS CORPORATI SOCCER SUPPLIES 56033 ADAPTIVE RECRE GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/00 $87.00 GENERAL SPORTS CORPORATI STAFF SHIRTS 56180 ATHLETIC ACTIV GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $281.72* 212250 07/18/00 $37.22 GERTEN GREENHOUSE ROUND UP /FLOWERS 099911 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI 2105 07/18/00 $85.79 GERTEN GREENHOUSE FLOWERS,.PLANTS 123783 POOL TRACK GRE TREES FLWR SHR 2105 < *> $123.01* 212251 07/18/00 $320.00 GILL, LINDA S. SL INTERPRETER 0051 ADAPTIVE RECRE PROF SERVICES < *> $320.00* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 12 -JUL -2000 (11 ) page 11 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION --------------------------------------------------------------------- INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM --------------------------------------------------------------- 07/18/00 $27.69 Glass & Mirror Outlet In DOOR RACK, CHROME 22133 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI 1834 < *> $27.69* 212253 07/18/00 $60.00 GLEN SIPE PIANO SERVICE TUNE PIANO 000628 POOL TRACK GRE SVC CONTR EQUI < *> DUES & $60.00* 6048 212254 07/18/00 212255 07/18/00 212256 07/18/00 212257 07/18/00 212258 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 212259 07/18/00 212261 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 212262 07/18/00 212263 07/18/00 $224.25 GLENWOOD WATER WATER 063000 POOL OPERATION GENERAL SUPPLI $224.25* $198.00 GLEWWE DOORS INC. MORTISE LOCK 92042 POOL OPERATION CONTR REPAIRS $198.00* $55.00 GOETZ, CONNIE NATURE CAMP REFUND 070600 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F $55.00* $300.00 GOLF MINNESOTA DIRECTORY LISTING W -20139 GOLF ADMINISTR DUES & SUBSCRI 6048 $300.00* $145.00 GOLFCRAFT GOLF CLUBS 13622 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6358 $580.00 GOLFCRAFT GOLF CLUBS 13658 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6358 $145.00 GOLFCRAFT GOLF CLUBS 13673 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6358 $435.00 GOLFCRAFT GOLF CLUBS 13689 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6358 $25.00 GOLFCRAFT GOLF CLUBS 13708 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6358 $38.00 GOLFCRAFT GOLF CLUBS 13711 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6358 $725.00 GOLFCRAFT GOLF CLUBS 13712 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6358 $145.00 GOLFCRAFT GOLF CLUBS 13717 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6358 $2,238.00* $59.08 GOPHER CASH REGISTER REG TAPE 21289 GOLF ADMINISTR OFFICE SUPPLIE 6092 $59.08* - $54.32 GRAINGER CREDIT MEMO 498 -7206 LIFT STATION M GENERAL SUPPLI 3805 $153.19 GRAINGER V -BELTS 495 -5337 LIFT STATION M REPAIR PARTS 1625 $30.99 GRAINGER CLOCKS 495 -1332 LIFT STATION M GENERAL SUPPLI 1782 $57.25 GRAINGER FILTER 495 -6328 LIFT STATION M REPAIR PARTS 1847 $76.77 GRAINGER MARKING PAINT 495 -6761 FIELD MAINTENA GENERAL SUPPLI 1736 $1,036.25 GRAINGER DUST /VAPOR FIXTURES 495 -6761 PARKING RAMP REPAIR PARTS 1668 $58.53 GRAINGER LIGHT BULBS 498 -7399 CLUB HOUSE GENERAL SUPPLI 6096 $13.43 GRAINGER CONDUIT BUSHINGS 495 -8659 ST LIGHTING OR GENERAL SUPPLI 1813 $1,898.04 GRAINGER DUST /VAPOR FIXTURE 495 -9064 PARKING RAMP REPAIR PARTS 1668 $69.75 GRAINGER GLOVE BAG, PROTECTOR 498 -8779 ST LIGHTING OR GENERAL SUPPLI 1780 $299.29 GRAINGER CONDUIT BUSHINGS, LOC 498 -8779 PARKING RAMP REPAIR PARTS 1813 $34.50 GRAINGER SAFETY GLOVES 937 -9064 ST LIGHTING OR GENERAL SUPPLI 1862 $37.45 GRAINGER BULBS 495 -0371 CLUB HOUSE LIGHT & POWER 6099 $69.14 GRAINGER CABLE TIES 495 -0830 FIELD MAINTENA GENERAL SUPPLI 1760 $18.19 GRAINGER CABLE TIES 495 -0830 FIELD MAINTENA GENERAL SUPPLI 1760 - $37.45 GRAINGER BULBS 498 -1505 CLUB HOUSE LIGHT & POWER 6099 $248.94 GRAINGER DRINKING FOUNTAIN 933 -0830 PATHS & HARD S GENERAL SUPPLI 1766 $3.76 GRAINGER BULBS 498 -1460 CLUB HOUSE LIGHT & POWER 6099 $4,013.70* $425.00 GRAND PERE WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 00007168 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE $425.00* $642.00 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 32067 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 12 -JUL -2000 (15:29) page 12 HECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------7----------------------------------------------- 212263 07/18/00 $406.00 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 32068 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 07/18/00 $289.00 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 32180 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $1,337.00* 212264 07/18/00 07/18/00 212265 07/18/00 07/18/00 212266 07/18/00 212268 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 212269 07/18/00 212270 07/18/00 212271 07/18/00 212272 07/18/00 212273 07/18/00 212274 07/18/00 212275 07/18/00 $40.56 $8.00 $48.56* $98.79 $200.48 $299.27* $232.00 $232.00* - $144.48 $524.70 - $25.37 - $43.10 - $231.80 $57.10 $7,841.53 $155.20 $56.14 $3,198.79 $22.88 $125.10 $183.57 $8,897.50 $0.60. $1,152.45 $26.09 $3,692.72 $91.76 $25,581.38* GRAUSAM, STEVE GRAUSAM, STEVE GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. GRAZZINI BROTHERS GRIGGS COOPER GRIGGS COOPER GRIGGS COOPER GRIGGS COOPER GRIGGS COOPER GRIGGS COOPER GRIGGS COOPER GRIGGS COOPER GRIGGS COOPER GRIGGS COOPER GRIGGS COOPER GRIGGS COOPER GRIGGS COOPER GRIGGS COOPER GRIGGS COOPER GRIGGS COOPER GRIGGS COOPER GRIGGS COOPER GRIGGS COOPER CO. CO. CO. CO. CO. CO. CO. CO. CO. CO. CO. CO. CO. CO. CO. CO. CO. CO. CO. GENERAL SUPPLIES 070600 LIQUOR YORK GE GENERAL SUPPLI MONTHLY MEETING 070600 LIQUOR YORK GE MEETING EXPENS VOLUME CONTROL 500 -5668 BUILDING MAINT REPAIR PARTS 1829 DESK VOLUME, TERM JAC 500 -5676 POOL OPERATION REPAIR PARTS 1740 TILE REPAIR 2 -00 -054 POOL OPERATION CONTR REPAIRS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 538612 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 232690 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 539768 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 539965 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 539966 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 234217 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 234218 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 234220 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 234222 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 234223 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 234223 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 234224 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 234228 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 234229 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 234231 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 237481 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 237482 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 237485 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 238426 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX $85.55 GRIGGS COOPER & COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 3993 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX $85.55* $68.96 GUSTAVE A. LARSON CO. REFRIGERANT, OIL BLM00515 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI 1870 $68.96* $136.92 HAAGEN -DAZS CO. ICE CREAM 00824760 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6332 $136.92* $271.42 HALLMAN OIL COMPANY OIL 37552 MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPLI 6363 $271.42* $245.38 HAMCO DATA PRODUCTS REGISTER TAPE & RIBBO 204868 YORK SELLING GENERAL SUPPLI 7515 $245.38* $277.13 HANSON PIPE & PRODUCTS I CATCH BASIN 47700031 GENERAL STORM PIPE 1708 $277.13* $48.00 HANSON, JANA FAB 4 & 5 REFUND 063000 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F COUNCIL CHECK .._SISTER 12 -JUL -2000 (1: A page 13 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <*> $48.00* 212276 07/18/00 $194.00 HAPPY FACES ENTERTAIN FOR FAMILY 052600 PLAYGROUND & T GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $194.00* 212277 07/18/00 $4,252.77 HARDRIVES INC. PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 071800 W 56- PARK -OAKL CIP < *> $4,252.77* 212278 07/18/00 $3,344.10 HARRIS BILLINGS COMPANY TOILET PARTITIONS 1008534 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 5871 < *> $3,344.10* 212279 07/18/00 $16.81 HAWKEYE FOODSERVICE DIST FRIES 1609997 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6333 07/18/00 $19.95 HAWKEYE FOODSERVICE DIST FRIES 1627679 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6333 07/18/00 $878.63 HAWKEYE FOODSERVICE DIST TOASTER 1637587 GRILL GENERAL SUPPLI 6333 07/18/00 $19.95 HAWKEYE FOODSERVICE DIST FRIES 1639452 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6333 < *> $935.34* 212280 07/18/00 $597.78 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT TANKS 267206 WATER TREATMEN REPAIR PARTS 1783 < *> $597.78* 212281 07/18/00 $362.07 HEALTHCARE RECOVERIES IN AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 070300 GENERAL FD PRO AMBULANCE FEES < *> $362.07* 212282 07/18/00 $137.50 HEGGIES PIZZA PIZZA 80433 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6334 < *> $137.50* 212283 07/18/00 $178.80 HEIMARK FOODS MEAT 014491 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6335 07/18/00 $178.80 HEIMARK FOODS BURGERS 014513 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6335 < *> $357.60* 212284 07/18/00 $249.60 HENNEPIN COUNTY GENERAL POSTAL VERIFICATION 070600 ELECTION POSTAGE < *> $249.60* 212285 07/18/00 $181.93 HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL MAY AMBULANCE SUPPLIE 8493 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 3701 < *> $181.93* 212286 07/18/00 $960.46 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF' BOOKING FEE APRIL 00 LEGAL SERVICES COURT CHARGES < *> $960.46* 212287 07/18/00 $1,249.50 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURE MAY CHARGES 002747 LEGAL SERVICES BRD & RM PRISO < *> $1,249.50* 212288 07/18/00 $415.35 HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MANUF FIELD STRIPING PAINT 51388 FIELD MAINTENA LINE MARK POWD 1169 07/18/00 $415.35 HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MANUF FIELD PAINT 51306 FIELD MAINTENA LINE MARK POWD 1768 < *> $830.70* 212289 07/18/00 $527.83 HJ GLOVE OF AMERICA GLOVES LS061500 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6305 < *> $527.83* 212290 07/18/00 $23.52 Hodge, Audrey CONTINUING ED 061900 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $23.52* 212291 07/18/00 $82.60 HOME JUICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 52572 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $82.60* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 12 -JUL 72000 (15:29) page 14 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM --------------------------------------------------------------------------_---------------------------------------------------------- 212292 07/18/00 $131.00 HONEYWELL INC. ACCESS CARDS 717PS698 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 3881 < *> $131.00* 212293 07/18/00 $253.52 HONEYWELL INC. AC REPAIRS 645HB949 CENTENNIAL LAK CONTR REPAIRS 2054 < *> $253.52* 212294 07/18/00 $28.12 HOUSEHOLD BANK F.S.B. (K WOOD FOR TARGETS 0217 -430 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI 3077 07/18/00 $14.51 HOUSEHOLD BANK F.S.B. (K LUMBER 0217 -430 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 1797 07/18/00 $43.18 HOUSEHOLD BANK F.S.B. (K GENERAL SUPPLIES 0217 -431 ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPLI 8036 07/18/00 $47.01 HOUSEHOLD BANK F.S.B. (K FLIPMARKER, VULKEM 0217 -431 BUILDING MAINT TOOLS 1753 < *> $132.82* 212295 07/18/00 $187.50 HOUSTON, CHRIS SKATING INSTUCTOR 070600 POOL TRACK GRE PROF SERVICES < *> $187.50* 212296 07/18/00 $35.00 HOVDE, LYNN PARTIAL REFUND 062700 POOL ADMIN SEASON TICKETS < *> $35.00* 212297 07/18/00 $60.16 HUEBSCH TOWELS, LINENS 155888 POOL TRACK GRE SVC CONTR EQUI CONTRACT 07/18/00 $10.10 HUEBSCH TOWELS, LINEN BAGS 160442 POOL TRACK GRE SVC CONTR EQUI < *> $70.26* 212298 07/18/00 $200.00 HYDUK, CARRIE SOCCER PROGRAM 070700 ADAPTIVE RECRE PROF SERVICES < *> $200.00* 212299. 07/18/00 $275.00 ICE SKATING INSTITUTE ISI DUES .11488 ED ADMINISTRAT DUES & SUBSCRI 2059 < *> $275.00* 212300 07/18/00 $21.00 IMMEN, TOM POOL PASS REFUND 070700 SWIM PROG SEASON TICKETS . < *> $21.00* 212301 07/18/00 $107.04 INDUSTRIAL DOOR CO. INC. GARAGE DOOR REPAIR 0049575 - MAINT OF LOURS REPAIR PARTS 6367 < *> $107.04* 212302 07/18/00 $303.00 INTERLACHEN TRAVEL NATL CONFERENCE AIRFA 118954 POOL ADMIN CONF & SCHOOLS 07/18/00 $286.00 INTERLACHEN TRAVEL AIRFARE 118960 PARK ADMIN. CONF & SCHOOLS 7013 < *> $589.00* 212303 07/18/00 $157.97 INTERNATIONAL E -Z UP INC SHELTER TOP REPLACEME 242251 BUILDING MAINT CONTR REPAIRS• 1737 < *> $157.97* 212304 07/18/00- $615.55 J.H. LARSON COMPANY WIRE, CABLE TIES 4178443- PARKING RAMP GENERAL SUPPLI 1793 07/18/00 $31.14 J.H. LARSON COMPANY VOLTAGE DETECTOR, BUL 4178966- PUMP & LIFT ST REPAIR PARTS 1846 < *> $646.69* 212305 07/18/00 $150.00 JAROSCH, BECKY SOCCER PROGRAM 070700 ADAPTIVE RECRE PROF SERVICES < *> $150.00* 212306 07/18/00 $400.00 JEFF ELLIS & ASSOCIATES PROFESSIONAL SERVICE 20001942 POOL OPERATION PROF SERVICES < *> $400.00* 212307 07/18/00 $300.00 JENSEN SWANSON & SONDRAL SPRINT LEASE AMEND 063000 CONTINGENCIES PROF SERVICES < *> $300.00* 212309 07/18/00 $41.83 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL "SUPPLIES 063000 ENGINEERING GE GENERAL SUPPLI COUNCIL CHECK - aISTER 12 -JUL -2000 (1. .) page 15 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------7------------------------------------------- 212309 07/18/00 $139.95 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 063000 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/00 $57.64 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 063000 STREET NAME SI GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/00 $15.62 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 063000 STREET REVOLVI GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/00 $58.77 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 063000 GRANDVIEW REVO GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/00 $47.54 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 063000 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/00 $185.92 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 063000 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/00 $3.37 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 063000 PUBLIC HEALTH GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/00 $4.58 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 063000 INSPECTIONS GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/00 $514.22 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 063000 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/00 $222.35 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 063000 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/00 $106.26 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 063000 PARK MAINTENAN GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/00 $669.03 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 063000 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/00 $149.60 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 063000 GOLF ADMINISTR GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/00 $5.42 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 063000 -RICHARDS MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/00 $65.96 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 063000 POOL OPERATION GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/00 $23.43 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES. 063000 ARENA ICE MAIN GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/00 $2.38 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 063000 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/00 $305.15 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 063000 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/00 $145.40 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 063000 PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/00 $34.02 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 063000 VERNON OCCUPAN GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $2,798.44* 21.2310 07/18/00 $39.41 JERRY'S PRINTING LABELS FOR TICKETS A -14860 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI 3072 07/18/00 $76.68 JERRY'S PRINTING ENROLLMENT FORMS A -14865 PARK ADMIN.. PRINTING 07/18/00 $39.41 JERRY'S PRINTING LABELS FOR CITATIONS A -14975 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/00 $252.00 JERRY'S PRINTING SAFETY SKILLS FOR CHI A -14963 POLICE DEPT. G BOOKS & PAMPHL 3090 < *> $407.50* 212311 07/18/00 $550.00 JOHN E REID ASSOC REID TECHNIQUE CLASS 38340 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $550.00* 212314 07/18/00 $2,669.83 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1129178 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 07/18/00 $1,478.80 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1129181 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 07/18/00 $790.53 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1129660 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 07/18/00 $4,382.03 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1131918 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 07/18/00 $2,489.28 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1131919 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 07/18/00 $163.29 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1131920 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 07/18/00 $184.10 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1131921 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 07/18/00 $2,800.91 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1131922 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 07/18/00 $86.60 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 1131923 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/00 $482.45 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1131924 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 07/18/00 $239.52 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST. OF GOODS SOLD MI 1131925 YORK SELLING CST OF.GDS MIX 07/18/00 $858.58 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1131926 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 07/18/00 $3,078.40 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1131927 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 07/18/00 $6,117.83 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1131928 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 07/18/00 $5,206.74 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1131929 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 07/18/00 $1,895.97 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1131930 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 07/18/00 $3,783.27 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1131931 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 07/18/00 $816.78 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1132550 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 07/18/00 $2,900.61 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1134316 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 07/18/00 $1,201.04 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1134317 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 07/18/00 $225.58 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1134318 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 07/18/00 $106.88 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1134319 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 07/18/00 $3,291.20 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1134320 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 07/18/00 $34.19 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 1134321 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER SWIMMING LESSON REFUN 063000 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F JOHNSTONE SUPPLY OF GOLD SAVERSTAT 168805 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 12 -JUL -2000 (15:29) page 16 CHECK.NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT CLUB HOUSE VENDOR 6105 JUNG, LAURIE DESCRIPTION 070700 INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 212314 07/18/00 $379.84 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1134322 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 07/18/00 $110.72 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 1134323 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/00 $508.74' JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1134324 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 07/18/00 $7,923.86 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1134325 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 07/18/00 $1,575.27 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1134326 YORK-SELLING CST OF GD WINE 07/18/00 $36.29 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1134327 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 07/18/00 $1,996.73 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1134328 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 07/18/00 $264.00 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 1135091 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE < *> $58,079.86* 212315 07/18/00 212316 07/18/00 212317 07/18/00 212318 07/18/00 212319 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 212320 212321 212322 212323 212324 212325 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 $60.00 $60.00* $21.77 $21.77* $174.53 $174.53* $191.95 $191.95* $108.10 $95.99 $105.91 - $14.79 $32.17 $327.38* $194.00 $194.00* $21.00 $3.69 $24.69* $800.00 $800.00* $116.00 $116.00* $235.32 $235.32* $810.00 - $104.00 $1,088.40 $832.00 $1,260.56 $75.00 $534.50 $1,341.40 $840.50 $42.00 JOHNSON, SARAH SWIMMING LESSON REFUN 063000 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F JOHNSTONE SUPPLY OF GOLD SAVERSTAT 168805 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 1798 JOHNSTONS SALES & SERVIC VAC REPAIR 373977 CLUB HOUSE REPAIR PARTS 6105 JUNG, LAURIE SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMEN 070700 SPECIAL ACTIVI PROF SERVICES JUSTUS LUMBER SUPPLIES 98818 MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPLI 3255 JUSTUS LUMBER FUEL CELLS, BATTERY 96369 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 1243 JUSTUS LUMBER HARDBOARD 65815 ART CENTER BLD LUMBER 1446 JUSTUS LUMBER HARDBOARD - CREDIT 46498 ART CENTER BLD LUMBER 1446 JUSTUS LUMBER SHELF BRACKETS, RODS 69567 VERNON OCCUPAN GENERAL SUPPLI 1922 KASPAR, GEORGE REIMBURSEMENT FOR ASE 062600 TRAINING CONF & SCHOOLS KASPRICK, JOHN MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 070300 VERNON LIQUOR MILEAGE KASPRICK, JOHN OFFICE SUPPLIES 070300 VERNON LIQUOR OFFICE SUPPLIE KDIZ RADIO DISNEY ADVERTISING 123 -0009 ED ADMINISTRAT ADVERT OTHER KIFFMEYER, WALLY SOFTBALL OFFICIAL 071000 EDINA ATHLETIC PROF SERVICES KIRKEEIDE, ROALD KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC. KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC. KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC. KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC. KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC. KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC. KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC. KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC.. KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC'. KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC. AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 070300 GENERAL FD PRO AMBULANCE FEES COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 130418 SOLD WI CM623A SOLD WI 132322 SOLD WI 132323 SOLD WI 132324 SOLD WI 132420 SOLD WI 132557 SOLD WI 132558 SOLD WI 132559 SOLD WI 132743 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE COUNCIL CHECK hL ,3ISTER 12 -JUL -2000 (1!� ) page 17 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <*> $6,720.36* 212326 07/18/00 $303.53 Koval Appliance Company DISHWASHER - STATION 062700 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 3876 < *> $303.53* 212327 07/18/00 $21.00 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 270404 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 07/18/00 $1,997.95 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 272021 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 07/18/00 $70.00 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 272022 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/00 $5,835.45 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 272131 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 07/18/00 $34.00 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 272141 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/00 $129.45 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 272568 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/00 $1,441.05 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 272569 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 07/18/00 $116.50 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 272669 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/00 $1,524.00 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 272670 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE < *> $11,169.40* 212328 07/18/00 $17.02 LA LOVING PARADE SUPPLIES 1- 935884 SPECIAL ACTIVI GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $17.02* 212329 07/18/00 $8.00 LAEDTKE, ELISE FIELD TRIP REFUND 070700 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F < *> $8.00* 212330 07/18/00 $350.07 LAKELAND ENGINEERING VALVES 12059495 WATER TREATMEN REPAIR PARTS 1881 < *> $350.07* 212331 07/18/00 $355.00 Lance, Lois CLASS REFUND 062800 ART CNTR PROG REGISTRATION F < *> $355.00* 212332 07/18/00 $105.90 LANDS' END CORPORATE SAL LOGO SHIRTS 01231444 VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $105.90* 212333 07/18/00 $100.00 LANTTO BUILDING COMPANY OVERCHARGE ON PERMIT 062900 CITY COUNCIL BUILDING PERMI < *> $100.00* 212334 07/18/00 $452.60 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. BRUSH, CONNECTORS, SL 1336183 WATER TREATMEN GENERAL SUPPLI 1680 07/18/00 $126.88 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. CABLE TIES 1341516 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 1843 07/18/00 $120.48 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. PAINT 1341517 FIELD MAINTENA GENERAL SUPPLI 1778 07/18/00 $389.83 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. BOLTS, ANCHORS, WASHE 1342280 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 1842 07/18/00 $416.42 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. RIVETS 1346089 EQUIPMENT OPER TOOLS 1877 < *> $1,506.21* 212335 07/18/00 $49.67 LEEF SERVICES MATS 270305 ART CENTER BLD LAUNDRY < *> $49.67* 212336 07/18/00 $380.22 LEITNER COMPANY SOIL 07/01 RICHARDS MAINT SOD & DIRT 6383 07/18/00 $1,492.96 LEITNER COMPANY SAND, TOPDRESSING 070100 MAINT OF COURS SOD & DIRT < *> $1,873.18* 212337 07/18/00 $112.00 Leonard, Laura PARTIAL REFUND 062800 POOL ADMIN SEASON TICKETS < *> $112.00* 212338 07/18/00 $269.99 LESCO INC. SPRAYER, ROUND -UP 1P7SQ5 GENERAL TURF C WEED SPRAY 1925 07/18/00 $103.61 LESCO INC. HERBICIDE, SPREADER 1P7UF2 GENERAL TURF C WEED SPRAY 5023 07/18/00 $540.21 LESCO INC. HERBICIDE, ACCLAIM 1P7V73 GENERAL TURF C WEED SPRAY 5050 07/18/00 $104.00 LESCO INC. FERTILIZER 1P7W01 GENERAL TURF C FERTILIZER 5305 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 12 -JUL -2000 (15:29) page 18 HECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 212338 07/18/00 $44.57 LESCO INC. FERTILIZER 1P7W18 GENERAL TURF C FERTILIZER 5305 07/18/00 $122.79 LESCO INC. POLE SAW, LOPPER 1D1AFJ4 GENERAL MAINT TOOLS 5515 07/18/00 $81.46 LESCO INC. TANK CLEANER, PITCHER 1P84Y1 GENERAL TURF C WEED SPRAY 5923 07/18/00 $63.87 LESCO INC. POSTING STICKS, SIGN 1P86C7 GENERAL TURF C WEED SPRAY 1295 07/18/00 $3,008.63 LESCO INC. FUNGICIDE 9RFEJ0 MAINT OF LOURS CHEMICALS 6492 07/18/00 $116.99 LESCO INC. FERTILIZER 1PBBT1 MAINT OF COURS CHEMICALS 6364 < *> $4,456.12* 212339 07/18/00 $100.00 LIPPS, SHARON PARTIAL REFUND 063000 POOL ADMIN SEASON TICKETS < *> $100.00* 212340 07/18/00 $6,833.14 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING AR0400 FINANCE DATA PROCESSIN 07/18/00 $2,873.21 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING AR0400 ASSESSING DATA PROCESSIN 07/18/00 $3,854.20 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING AR0400 GENERAL(BILLIN DATA PROCESSIN 07/18/00 $1,684.47 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING AR0400 INSPECTIONS DATA PROCESSIN 07/18/00 $211.19 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING AR0400 COMMUNICATIONS DATA PROCESSIN 07/18/00 $1,732.97 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING AR0400 POLICE DEPT. G DATA PROCESSIN 07/18/00 $1,568.55 LOGIS DATA PROCESSING AR0400 CENT SVC GENER DATA PROCESSIN 07/18/00 $2,232.93 LOGIS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AR0400 CENT SVC GENER PROF SERVICES < *> $20,990.66* 212341 07/18/00 $48.00 LUCKTENBERG, CELESTE FAB 4 &5 REFUND 062600 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F < *> $48.00* 212342 07/18/00 $78.00 LUCKTENBERG, PAUL SOFTBALL UMPIRE 071000 EDINA ATHLETIC PROF SERVICES < *> $78.00* 212343 07/18/00 $7.00 Lund Food Holdings Inc PARK PERMIT OVERPAYME 070500 STREET REVOLVI OTHER PERM & L < *> $7.00* 212344 07/18/00 $26.63 MAC PROFESSIONAL'S BOOK SUBSCRIPTIONS 061900 MEDIA LAB DUES & SUBSCRI 9087 07/18/00 $26.44 MAC PROFESSIONAL'S BOOK GENERAL SUPPLIES 0630 MEDIA LAB GENERAL SUPPLI 9078 07/18/00 $20.44 MAC PROFESSIONAL'S BOOK GENERAL SUPPLIES 063000 MEDIA LAB GENERAL SUPPLI 9079 < *> $73.51* 212345 07/18/00 $280.00 MAIRS, CANDYCE SKATING INSTRUCTOR 070600 POOL TRACK GRE PROF. SERVICES < *> $280.00* 212346 07/18/00 $10.00 MANTELL,. SUE PARTIAL REFUND 062900 POOL ADMIN SEASON TICKETS < *> $10.00* 212349 07/18/00 $616.55 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 165009 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 07/18/00 $92.00 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 165010 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 07/18/00 $2,759.80 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 165555 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 07/18/00 $27.00 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 165556 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/00 $1,162.60 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 165557 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 07/18/00 $4,706.72 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 165578 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 07/18/00 $92.00 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 165579 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 07/18/00 $55.95 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 165580 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/00 $47.20 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 165581 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX - 07/18/00 $254.00 MARK VII SALES BEER 167494 GRILL CST OF GDS BEE 6337 07/18/00 $65.00 MARK VII SALES BEER. 167495 FRED RICHARDS CST OF GDS BEE 6337 07/18/00 $1,697.20 MARK VII SALES COST _ OF GOODS SOLD BE 168043 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 07/18/00 $86.35 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 168044 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/00 $36.00 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 168045 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX COUNCIL CHECK hLvISTER 286760 50TH STREET RU PROF SERVICES MERIT SUPPLY LPSI, POLY LINERS 54022 12 -JUL -2000 (1- -o) page 19 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT 54042 POOL TRACK GRE VENDOR 2108 DESCRIPTION SUPPLY INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT REPAIR PARTS PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 212349 07/18/00 $3,228.80 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 168202 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 07/18/00 $95.75 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 168203 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/00 $81.00 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 168204 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/00 $92.00 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 168205 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 07/18/00 $3,353.40 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 168212 YORK.SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 07/18/00 $275.94 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 168734 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 07/18/00 $1,132.85 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 168735 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 07/18/00 $2,199.30 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 168747 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 07/18/00 $1,208.65 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 170554 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 07/18/00 $92.00 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 170556 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE - 07/18/00 $2,519.80 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 170557 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE < *> $25,977.86* 212350 07/18/00 $145.00 MATRIX COMMUNICATIONS IN CHANGE FAX PHONE # 0042581- POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP MAINT 07/18/00 $355.00 MATRIX COMMUNICATIONS IN EMERGENCY SERVICE 0042838- CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE 07/18/00 $145.00 MATRIX COMMUNICATIONS IN MODEM LINE 42845 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE < *> $645.00* 212351 07/18/00 $330.11 MAXFLI GOLF DIVISION GOLF BALLS 2212451 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6216 < *> $330.11* 212352 07/18/00 $551.02 MCCAREN DESIGNS INC. FLOWERS, PLANTS 13367 POOL TRACK GRE TREES FLWR SHR 2292 < *> $551.02* 212353 07/18/00 212354 07/18/00 212355 07/18/00 212356 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 212357 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 212358 07/18/00 212359 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 212360 07/18/00 $5.00 MCGARRY, JOANNE FIELD TRIP REFUND $5.00* $68.24 MEDTRONIC PHYSIO CONTROL LIFEPAK MAINT. $68.24* $100.56 MEDZIS, ANDREW 7ETTY CASH $100.56* $45.55 $100.12 $102.10 $247.77* $136.95 $117.98 $53.39 $42.25 $350.57* $159.79 $159.79* $319.23 $428.72 $759.03 $462.21 $514.45 $2,483.64* 070500 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F IV621121 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 3799 071000 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI MENARDS ACCT #35170288 COLOR GUARD FENCING 45309 MENARDS ACCT #35170288 GENERAL SUPPLIES 32527 MENARDS ACCT #35170288 SHOP VAC /FAN /SQUEEGGE 47130 MENARDS * ACCT #30240251 CABINET & SUPPLIES 96252 MENARDS * ACCT #30240251 MULCH, SCRAPER, KNIFE 97284 MENARDS * ACCT #30240251 TOOLS & SUPPLIES 97813 MENARDS * ACCT #30240251 MULCH 99260 POOL TRACK GRE GENERAL SUPPLI 2111 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI 2073 LIQUOR YORK GE GENERAL SUPPLI 7543 CENTENNIAL LAX GENERAL SUPPLI 2042 GENERAL TURF C GENERAL SUPPLI 1754 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI 2050 TREES & MAINTE PLANT & TREES 1955 MERCURY WASTE SOLUTIONS RECYCLE LIGHTS 286760 50TH STREET RU PROF SERVICES MERIT SUPPLY LPSI, POLY LINERS 54022 PW BUILDING CLEANING SUPPL 1845 MERIT SUPPLY SOAP, TOWELS, CLEANER 54042 POOL TRACK GRE GENERAL SUPPLI 2108 MERIT SUPPLY RECOVERY TANK, VAC MO 54061 VERNON OCCUPAN REPAIR PARTS 1570 MERIT SUPPLY GLASS & LEATHER CLEAN 54110 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 1920 MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 54126 POOL TRACK GRE CLEANING SUPPL 2115 $37.00 METRO LEGAL SERVICES TITLE /TAX SEARCH 104996 CDBG PROG PROF SERVICES �OUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 12 -JUL -2000 (15:29) page 20 :HECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 212360 07/18/00 $37.00 METRO LEGAL SERVICES TITLE /TAX SEARCH 106524 CDBG PROG PROF SERVICES. < *> $74.00* 212361 07/18/00 $53.99 METROCALL PAGER SERVICE 9103830 PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPLI 5110 07/18/00 $43.80 METROCALL PAGER SERVICE 9103830 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/00 $43.80 METROCALL PAGER SERVICE 9103830 CLUB HOUSE GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/00 $10.95 METROCALL PAGER SERVICE 9103830 VERNON OCCUPAN GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/00 $10.95 METROCALL PAGER SERVICE 9103830 YORK OCCUPANCY GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/00 $10.95 METROCALL PAGER SERVICE 9103830 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/00 $10.95. METROCALL PAGER SERVICE 9103830 STREET REVOLVI GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/00 $10.95 METROCALL PAGER SERVICE 9103830 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/00 $87.60 METROCALL PAGER SERVICE 9103830 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL,SUPPLI 07/18/00 $21.89 METROCALL- PAGER SERVICE 9103830 PUBLIC HEALTH GENERAL SUPPLI <*> $305.83* 212362 07/18/00 $216,676.00 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENV SEWER SERVICE 00007078 SEWER TREATMEN SEWER SVC METR < *> $216,676.00* 212363 07/18/00 $4,356.00 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL SAC FOR JUNE 063000 GENERAL FD PRO SAC CHARGES < *> $4,356.00* 212364 07/18/00 $600.00 MGFOA J. WALLIN, P. GIBBS, CONFEREN FINANCE. CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $600.00* 212365 07/18/00 $416.00 MIDWEST AQUA CARE LAKE TREATMENT /INDIAN 06/21 2000 AQUATIC W PROF SERVICES 1742 07/18/00 $5,860.00 MIDWEST AQUA CARE LAKE TREATMENT /INDIAN 0621 2000 AQUATIC W PROF SERVICES 1742 07/18/00 $6,440.00 MIDWEST AQUA CARE LAKE TREATMENT /ARROWH 062100 2000 AQUATIC W PROF SERVICES 1744 < *> $12,716.00* 212366 07/18/00 $5,553.21 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. ASPHALT 68101MB STREET RENOVAT BLACKTOP 1046 07/18/00 $10,619.11 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. ASPHALT 68125MB STREET RENOVAT BLACKTOP 1046 < *> $16,172.32* 212367 07/18/00 $48.88 MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPLY LINERS 18743 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI 9080 < *> $48.88* 212369 07/18/00 $66.70 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI COST OF GOODS SOLD 19507275 POOL CONCESSIO COST OF GD SOL 07/18/00 $190.30 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI COKE 66482151 FRED RICHARDS COST OF GD SOL 6327 . 07/18/00 $38.00 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI COKE 66482169 FRED RICHARDS COST OF GD SOL 6327 07/18/00 -$6.85 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI COKE 66482177 FRED RICHARDS COST OF GD SOL 6327 07/18/00 $682.58 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 62193151 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/00 $95.00 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI COKE 67069015 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6327 07/18/00 $846.65 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI COKE 67069023 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6327 07/18/00 $136.00 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI CONCESSION PRODUCT 19534444 POOL CONCESSIO COST OF GD SOL 07/18/00 $184.80 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI COST OF GOODS SOLD 19570547 CENTENNIAL_LAK COST OF GD SOL 07/18/00 $120.50 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI COST OF GOODS SOLD 19578318 POOL CONCESSIO COST OF GD SOL 07/18/00 $243.45 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI COKE 67073124 FRED RICHARDS COST OF GD SOL 6327 07/18/00 $501.52 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 61144179 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/00 $85.50 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI COKE 67076028 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6327 07/18/00 $978.35 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI COKE 67076036 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6327 < *> $4,162.50* 212370 0•/18/00 $188.37 MIDWEST VENDING INC CANDY 2112 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6338 . < *> $188.37* COUNCIL CHECK _ JISTER 12 -JUL -2000 (1. -4) page 21 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM --------------------------------------------------------------.---------------------------------------------------------------------- 212371 07/18/00 $491.55 MINN COMM PAGER SERVICE 30343070 POOL TRACK GRE SVC CONTR EQUI < *> $491.55* 212372 07/18/00 $2,449.50 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN S REPLACE SERVICE 31770 DISTRIBUTION CONTR REPAIRS 1508 07/18/00 $600.00 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN S CUT OFF WATER SERVICE 31773 DISTRIBUTION CONTR REPAIRS 1512 07/18/00 $1,530.00 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN S REPLACE SERVICE 31774 DISTRIBUTION CONTR REPAIRS 1513 07/18/00 $375.00 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN S REPAIR STAND PIPE 31776 DISTRIBUTION CONTR REPAIRS 1511 07/18/00 $1,075.50 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN S REPLACE SERVICE 31777 DISTRIBUTION CONTR REPAIRS 1514 < *> $6,030.00* 212373 07/18/00 $105.00 MINNEAPOLIS AREA ASSOC 0 LISTING SERVICE 1069200 ASSESSING DUES & SUBSCRI < *> $105.00* 212374 07/18/00 $450.00 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPA BURN BLDG RENTAL 28200000 FIRE DEPT. GEN PROF SERVICES < *> $450.00* 212375 07/18/00 $43.89 MINNESOTA AIR TIME -DELAY RELAY 3378091 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 1836 < *> $43.89* 212376 07/18/00 $78.50 MINNESOTA ELEVATOR INC JUNE SERVICE 17053 POOL TRACK GRE SVC CONTR EQUI CONTRACT < *> $78.50* 212377 07/18/00 $983.17 MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOC MINNESOTA IN OUR TIME 13.9408 ART SUPPLY.GIF COST OF GD SOL 9070 < *> $983.17* 212378 07/18/00 $92.00 MINNESOTA SAFETY COUNCIL BIKE HELMETS 75379 POLICE DEPT. G SAFETY EQUIPME 2017 < *> $92.00* 212379 07/18/00 $85.25 MINNESOTA STATEWIDE 9 -1- 911 BILLING 061300 POLICE DEPT..G PROF SERVICES < *> $85.25* 212380 07/18/00 $193.40 MINNESOTA TROPHIES & GIF EXPLORERS TROPHY 101434 RESERVE PROGRA GENERAL SUPPLI 3043 07/18/00 $94.89 MINNESOTA TROPHIES & GIF P.A.R. ENGRAVING 101471 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 3862 < *> $288.29* 212381 07/18/00 $149.50 MIZUNO USA INC GOLF CLUBS 0280792 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS- PR-6360 07/18/00 $1,156.00 MIZUNO USA INC GOLF CLUBS 0288428 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6360 07/18/00 $47.60 MIZUNO USA INC GOLF CLUBS 0295298 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6360 07/18/00 $199.21 MIZUNO USA INC GOLF CLUBS 0297451 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6360 07/18/00 $51.31 MIZUNO USA INC GOLF CLUBS 0297452 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6360 07/18/00 $544.00 MIZUNO USA INC GOLF CLUBS 0298452 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6360 < *> $2,147.62* 212382 07/18/00 $312.00 MDSE, WILLIAM SOFTBALL OFFICIAL 071000 EDINA ATHLETIC PROF SERVICES < *> $312.00* 212383 07/18/00 $60.00 MPGMA EVENT REGISTRATION ON 062600 GOLF ADMINISTR CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $60.00* 212384 07/18/00 $100.00 MPSA 3RD QUARTERLY MEETING 070500 PARK MAINTENAN CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $100.00* 212385 07/18/00 $57.08 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. IRRIGATION PARTS 24259 -00 MAINT OF COURS IRRIGATION EQU 6482 07/18/00 $37.94 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. IRRIGATION PARTS 25732 -00 FIELD MAINTENA REPAIR PARTS 1733 07/18/00 $168.58 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. MOWER BLADE 23807 -00 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1709 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 12 -JUL -2000 (15:29) page 22 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM, OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 212385 07/18/00 $482.57 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. TINES FOR MOWER 26255 -00 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1731 07/18/00 $199.92 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. IRRIGATION PARTS 26653 -00 MAINT OF COURS IRRIGATION EQU 6358 07/18/00 $105.39 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. STANDARD & RUBBER COV 26925 -00 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1868 07/18/00 $19.86 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. REPAIR PARTS 27793 -00 MAINT OF LOURS REPAIR PARTS 6365 < *> $1,071.34* 212386 07/18/00 $112.57 MUNICILITE CO. RESPONDER 637 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 1643 07/18/00 $480.10 MUNICILITE CO. MAG MOUNT MINI LIGHTS 690 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1822 07/18/00 $59.64 MUNICILITE CO. MAGNET 691 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1923 < * >. $652.31* 212387 07/18/00 $299.52 MURNANE, CHRISTY AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 070300 GENERAL FD PRO AMBULANCE FEES < *> $299.52* 212388 07/18/00 $340.16 NAPA AUTO PARTS REPAIR PARTS 063000 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $340.16* 212389 07/18/00 $633.45 NASCO LAB SUPPLIES 61543 LABORATORY GENERAL SUPPLI 1878 < *> $633.45* 212390 07/18/00 $574.00 NATIONAL BUSINESS FURNIT DESK Y80502 -S PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 1856 < *> $574.00* 212391 07/18/00 $52.19 NEW PROS DATA INC. SUPPLIES 543439 -1 FRED RICHARDS GENERAL SUPPLI 6102 < *> $52.19* 212392 07/18/00 $20.00 NORTH MEMORIAL HEALTH CA NORTH EMS EDUCATION PTAC04 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $20.00* 2.12393 07/18/00 $173.60 NORTH STAR BUMPER CHROME PLATING 02462655 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1806 < *> $173.60* 212394 07/18/00 $51.26 NORTH STAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 50017603 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/00 $30.26 NORTH STAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 41017818 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/00 $102.52 NORTH STAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 44018021 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/00 $64.85 NORTH.STAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 13018302 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/00 $126.00 NORTH STAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 50018302 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/00 $12.35 NORTH STAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 13018500 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/00 $118.58 NORTH STAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 13018509 YORK SELLING. CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/00 $98.20 NORTH STAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 50018303 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/00 $199.50 NORTH STAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 50019004 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/00 $94.49 NORTH STAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 50019007 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $898.01* 212395 07/18/00 $40.79 NORTH STAR TURF SUPPLY PIN -JACK 228164 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1415 07/18/00 - $40.79 NORTH STAR TURF SUPPLY CREDIT MEMO 229760 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 07/18/00 $70.48 NORTH STAR TURF SUPPLY SWITCH 230013 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1807 07/18/00 $144.47 NORTH STAR TURF SUPPLY REPAIR PARTS 230585 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 6361 < *> $214.95* 212396 07/18/00 $182,619.52 NORTHDALE CONSTRUCTION C PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 071800 STORM SEWER CIP < *> $182,619.52* 212397 07/18/00 $66,035.80 NORTHDALE CONSTRUCTION C PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 07/18 SANITARY SEWER CIP < *> $66,035.80* COUNCIL CHECK — JISTER 12 -JUL -2000 (1_ J) page 23 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.------------------- 212398 07/18/00 $700.00 NORTHEAST FIRE APPARATUS COMMAND TRAINING CSDB -000 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONF & SCHOOLS 3875 < *> $700.00* 212399 07/18/00 $118.04 NORTHERN AIR CORPORATION REPAIRS 47348 POOL OPERATION CONTR REPAIRS < *> $118.04* 212400 07/18/00 $923.48 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO. TIRES NW -63904 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES 1408 07/18/00 $110.50 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO. TIRES NW -63961 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES 1408 07/18/00 $84.14 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO. TIRES NW -63978 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES 1408 07/18/00 $134.60 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO. RECAP DRIVE TRACK NW -64170 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES 1408 < *> $1,252.72* 212403 07/18/00 $26,508.83 NSP LIGHT & POWER 072100 ST LIGHTING RE LIGHT & POWER 07/18/00 $336.47 NSP LIGHT & POWER 072100 ST LIGHTING OR LIGHT & POWER 07/18/00 $4,771.38 NSP LIGHT & POWER 072100 TRAFFIC SIGNAL LIGHT & POWER 07/18/00 $2,300.29 NSP LIGHT & POWER 072100 PARKING RAMP LIGHT & POWER 07/18/00 $561.20 NSP LIGHT & POWER 072100 FIRE DEPT. GEN LIGHT & POWER 07/18/00 $122.96 NSP LIGHT & POWER 072100 YORK FIRE STAT LIGHT & POWER 07/18/00 $52.76 NSP LIGHT & POWER 072100 CIVIL DEFENSE LIGHT & POWER 07/18/00 $2,621.70 NSP LIGHT & POWER 072100 CITY HALL GENE LIGHT & POWER 07/18/00 $3,258.56 NSP LIGHT & POWER 072100 PW BUILDING LIGHT & POWER 07/18/00 $8,932.17 NSP LIGHT & POWER 072100 BUILDING MAINT LIGHT & POWER 07/18/00 $5,202.42 NSP LIGHT & POWER 072100 CLUB HOUSE LIGHT & POWER 07/18/00 $655.44 NSP LIGHT & POWER 072100 MAINT OF COURS LIGHT & POWER 07/18/00 $599.47 NSP LIGHT & POWER 072100 FRED RICHARDS LIGHT & POWER 07/18/00 .$1,385.24 NSP LIGHT & POWER 072100 GOLF DOME LIGHT & POWER 07/18/00 $2,579.47 NSP LIGHT & POWER 072100 POOL OPERATION LIGHT & POWER 07/18/00 $15,881.74 NSP LIGHT & POWER 072100 ARENA BLDG /GRO LIGHT & POWER 07/18/00 $1,000.34 NSP LIGHT & POWER 072100 ART CENTER BLD LIGHT & POWER 07/18/00 $10,758.27 NSP LIGHT & POWER 072100 POOL TRACK GRE LIGHT & POWER 07/18/00 $2,136.91 NSP LIGHT & POWER 072100 CENTENNIAL LAK LIGHT & POWER 0.7/18/00 $2,588.44 NSP. LIGHT & POWER 072100 PUMP & LIFT ST LIGHT & POWER 07/18/00 $31,045.18 NSP LIGHT & POWER 072100 DISTRIBUTION LIGHT & POWER 07/18/00 $297.35 NSP LIGHT & POWER 072100 TANKS TOWERS & LIGHT & POWER 07/18/00 $1,001.62 NSP LIGHT & POWER 072100 50TH ST OCCUPA LIGHT & POWER 07/18/00 $1,318.36 NSP LIGHT & POWER 072100 YORK OCCUPANCY LIGHT & POWER 07/18/00 $851.81 NSP LIGHT & POWER 072100 VERNON OCCUPAN LIGHT & POWER 07/18/00 $57.87 NSP LIGHT & POWER 072100 GENERAL STORM LIGHT & POWER 07/18/00 $248.97 NSP LIGHT & POWER 072100 PONDS & LAKES LIGHT & POWER < *> $127,075.22* 212404 07/18/00 $40.00 O'NEAL, MARIAN SWIMMING CLASS REFUND 07/07 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F 07/18/00 $37.00 O'NEAL, MARIAN TENNIS LESSON REFUND 070700 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F < *> $77.00* 212405 07/18/00 $46.30 OFFICEMAX CREDIT PLAN REGISTER TAPE 1656 ED ADMINISTRAT OFFICE SUPPLIE 2057 07/18/00 $28.74 OFFICEMAX CREDIT PLAN 3 -HOLE PUNCH 2537 COMMUNICATIONS GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $75.04* 212406 07/18/00 $101.24 OLSEN COMPANIES SLING, WRENCH 28754 PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPLI 1832 07/18/00 $145.23 OLSEN COMPANIES DRILL 30766 BUILDING MAINT TOOLS 1734 07/18/00 $30.90 OLSEN COMPANIES REPAIR PARTS 31187 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 6473 07/18/00 $12.27 OLSEN COMPANIES REPAIR PARTS 31251 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 6473 < *> $289.64* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER POOL TRACK GRE CONTR REPAIRS 2297 CREDIT 41220 12 -JUL -2000 (15:29) page 24 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR PAGER DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------7-------------------------.--------------- 212407 07/18/00 $438.00 OMNILIFT USA PERKINS LIFTING DEVICE 0153 SEWER TREATMEN GENERAL SUPPLI 1507 < *> $438.00* 212408 07/18/00 $108.00 OSBORN, THOMAS CLASS REFUND 062800 ART CNTR PROG REGISTRATION F < *> $108.00* 212409 07/18/00 $136.50 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC. COOKIES 67902003 POOL CONCESSIO COST OF GD SOL 07/18/00 $99.00 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC. COOKIES 63246502 POOL CONCESSIO COST OF GD SOL 07/18/00 $168.50 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC. COOKIES 66337702 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 6339 07/18/00 $215.50 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC. COOKIES 70217103 POOL CONCESSIO COST OF GD SOL < *> $619.50* 212410 07/18/00 07/18/00 212411 07/18/00 07/18/00 212412 07/18/00 07/18/00 212413 07/18/00 212414 212415 212416 212417 212418 212421 $1,589.42 OWENS SERVICES CORP. - $802.89 OWENS SERVICES CORP. $786.53* $422.76 PAGENET $8.17 PAGENET $430.93* $314.96 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY $288.16 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY, $603.12* $19.62 PERA $19.62* FIX POOL PAK UNIT 41196 POOL TRACK GRE CONTR REPAIRS 2297 CREDIT 41220 POOL TRACK GRE CONTR REPAIRS RENTAL EQUIPMENT 00017311 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP RENTAL PAGER 070100 CITY HALL GENE GENERAL SUPPLI COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 48640637 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 49258030 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX CONTRIBUTION 07/18/00 $762.00 PERA CONTRIBUTION $762.00* 07/18/00 $63,879.66 PERA CONTRIBUTION $63,879.66* 07/18/00 $985.00 PERKINS LANDSCAPE CONTRA TEE OASIS 07/18/00 $225.00 PERKINS LANDSCAPE CONTRA TEE REPAIR $1,210.00* 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 07/18/00 $318.30 $318.30* $758.28 $758.28* -$5.99 - $43.19 - $287.26 - $23.44 -$4.16 -$5.62 - $13.23 -$2.15 $170.00 $115.65 $47.19 $494.88 PETERSEN, SHIRLEY PGI COMPANIES INC PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 071100 GENERAL FD PRO P.E.R.A. PAYAB 07/11 GENERAL FD PRO P.E.R.A. PAYAB 07 -11 GENERAL FD PRO P.E.R.A. PAYAB 06/23 GOLF PROG MEN'S CLUB 6107 062300 MAINT OF COURS'PROF SERVICES 6373 REIMBURSEMENT- VEHICLE 062700 PATHS & HARD S PROF SERVICES INSPECTION REPORTS 19629 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 1565 COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS C08T OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI SOLD WI SOLD LI SOLD WI SOLD WI SOLD WI SOLD WI SOLD WI SOLD BE SOLD MI SOLD MI SOLD LI 3217015 3217135 3217136 3217137 3217370 3217371 3217372 3217373 619400 619404 621552 621554 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU COUNCIL CHECK . _,ISTER 12 -JUL -2000 (1. ) page 25 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM --------------------------------------------------------------.---------------------------------------------------------------------- 212421 07/18/00 $2,872.13 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 621555 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 07/18/00 $900.61 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 621556 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 07/18/00 $1,965.97 PHILLIPS, WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 621557 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 07/18/00 $858.34 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 621558 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 07/18/00 $3,855.85 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 621559 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 07/18/00 $19.00 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 621560 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 07/18/00 $1,589.50 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 621878 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 07/18/00 $913.82 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 622743 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 07/18/00 $34.89 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 622847 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/00 $542.60 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 622848 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 07/18/00 $1,526.77 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 622849 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 07/18/00 $1,540.93 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI.623449 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 07/18/00 $76.44 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF.GOODS SOLD LI 623450. 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 07/18/00 $127.45 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 623451 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 07/18/00 $424.04 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 623452 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 07/18/00 $692.23 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 623453 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 07/18/00 $879.34 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 623454 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 07/18/00 $463.67 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 623455 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $19,726.26* 212422 07/18/00 $173.43 PING GOLF CLUBS 4568894 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6307 < *> $173.43* 212424 07/18/00 $838.80 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 32154 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/00 $1,146.36 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 32194 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/00 $35.65 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 32195 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/00 $714.94 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 32225 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/00 $125.44 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 32257 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/00 $514.30 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 32268 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/00 - $27.96 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 32357 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/00 $18.65 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 32371 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/00 $531.24 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 32426 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/00 $235.01 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 32430 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/00 $531.24 PINNACLE.DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 32480 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/00 $643.08 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 32491 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/00 $579.80 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING CIGARS 32535 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6106 07/18/00 $207.12 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 32551 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $6,093.67* 212425 07/18/00 $2,145.00 PLANET SOCCER LIFEGUARD WARM -UPS 58527 4 POOL OPERATION LAUNDRY 4764 < *> $2,145.00* 212426 07/18/00 $735.82 POLO RALPH LAUREN CORPOR MERCHANDISE 204866 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS-PR 6202 < *> $735.82* 212427 07/18/00 $167.25 POPP TELCOM PHONE REPAIRS 39034 GOLF ADMINISTR SVC CONTR EQUI 6100 < *> $167.25* 212428 07/18/00 $403.38 POWER PROCESS EQUIPMENT PACKING 094448 LIFT STATION M REPAIR PARTS 1707 < *> $403.38* 212429 07/18/00 $149.10 PRECISION TURF & CHEMICA SUPPLIES 16148 MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPLI 6360 < *> $149.10* 212430 07/18/00 $996.00 PREMIER FLEET SERVICES BODYWORK, PAINT, SERV 14523 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 1872 2OUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 12 -JUL -2000 (15:29) page 26 HECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE 'PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ----------------------=--------------------------------------------7---------------------------------------------------------------- <*> $996.00* 212431 07/18/00 $501.73 PRINT SHOP, THE < *> $501.73* 212433 07/18/00 -$5.46 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 07/18/00 $2,061.48 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 07/18/00 $740.40 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 07/18/00 $1,154.75 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 07/18/00 $384.89 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 07/18/00 $328.00 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 07/18/00 $2,254.04 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 07/18/00 .$421.43 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 07/18/00 $362.40 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 07/18/00 $542.10 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 07/18/00 $977.38 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 07/18/00 $721.20 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 07/18/00 $64.60 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 07/18/00 $264.50 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 07/18/00 $1,000.99 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 07/18/00 $157.92 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 07/18/00 $318.95 PRIOR WINE COMPANY < *> $11,749.57* _212434 07/18/00 $6.00 PROTECTION ONE < *> $6.00* 212435 07/18/00 $27.00 PUSATERI, MELLANIE 07/18/00 $19.07 PUSATERI, MELLANIE < *> $46.07* 212439 07/18/00 $78.60 QUALITY WINE 07/18/00 -$0.78 QUALITY WINE 07/18/00 - $37.83 QUALITY WINE 07/18/00 $419.10 QUALITY WINE 07/18/00 -$4.14 QUALITY WINE 07/18/00 - $38.81 QUALITY WINE 07/18/00 - $95.10 QUALITY WINE 07/18/00 $215.31. QUALITY WINE 07/18/00 -$4.27 QUALITY WINE 07/18/00 $215.31 QUALITY WINE 07/18/00 -$4.27 QUALITY WINE 07/18/00 $215.31 QUALITY WINE 07/18/00 -$4.27 QUALITY WINE 07/18/00 $1,335.23 QUALITY WINE 07/18/00 - $26.52 QUALITY WINE 07/18/00 $2,717.39 QUALITY WINE 07/18/00 - $53.94 QUALITY WINE 07/18/00 $4,089.91 QUALITY WINE 07/18/00 - $81.20 QUALITY WINE 07/18/00 $2,136.97 QUALITY WINE 07/18/00 - $21.17 QUALITY WINE 07/18/00 $5,210.41 QUALITY WINE 07/18/00 - $51.65 QUALITY WINE 07/18/00 $6,139.65 QUALITY WINE NEWSLETTER 11176 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 536593 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 232689 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 234216 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 234219 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 234225 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 234227 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 234230 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 235914 COST OF GOODS SOLD'WI 236415 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 236495 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 236416 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 236496 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 236766 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 236767 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 237011 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 237012 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 237013 ALARM SERVICE 0710 GENERAL SUPPLIES 062900 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMEN 070600 SENIOR CITIZEN GENERAL SUPPLI 7010 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE ARENA BLDG /GRO ALARM SERVICE 8041 POOL OPERATION GENERAL SUPPLI POOL OPERATION GENERAL SUPPLI COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 540827 -0 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 840827 -0 YORK SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 846765 -0 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 849059 -0 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 849059 -0 YORK SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 849770 -0 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 849784 -0 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 850219 -0 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU TRADE DISCOUNTS 850219 -0 50TH ST SELLIN TRADE DISCOUNT COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 850220 -0 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU TRADE DISCOUNTS 850220 -0 YORK SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 850221 -0 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU TRADE DISCOUNTS 850221 -0 VERNON SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 850267 -0 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU TRADE DISCOUNTS 850267 -0 50TH ST SELLIN TRADE DISCOUNT COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 850269 -0 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU TRADE DISCOUNTS 850269 -0 YORK SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 850270 -0 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU TRADE DISCOUNTS 850270 -0 VERNON SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 850348 -0 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 850348 -0 50TH ST SELLIN TRADE DISCOUNT COST-OF GOODS SOLD WI 850349 -0 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 850349 -0 YORK SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 850350 -0 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE COUNCIL CHECK SISTER $145.04 RELIANT ENERGY - MINNEGA HEAT 12 -JM -2000 (1 j) page 27 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT 07/18/00 VENDOR DESCRIPTION ENERGY - INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ---------------------------------------------------------------_--------------------------------------------------------------------- 212439 07/18/00 - $60.71 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS ENERGY - 850350 -0 VERNON SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT 07/18/00 $981.20 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 851286 -0 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 07/18/00 -$9.68 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS ENERGY - 851286 -0 YORK SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT 07/18/00 $1,722.13 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 852001 -0 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 07/18/00 - $17.02 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS ENERGY - 852001 -0 YORK SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT 07/18/00 $1,243.53 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 852008 -0 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 07/18/00 - $24.67 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS ENERGY - 852008 -0 50TH ST SELLIN TRADE DISCOUNT 07/18/00 $4,851.52 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 852009 -0 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 07/18/00 - $96.38 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS ENERGY - 852009 -0 YORK SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT 07/18/00 $3,515.56 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 852010 -0 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 07/18/00 - $69.89 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS ENERGY 852010 -0 VERNON SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT 07/18/00 $1,509.34 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 852047 -0 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 07/18/00 - $14.95 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS ENERGY 852047 -0 50TH ST SELLIN TRADE DISCOUNT 07/18/00 $3,380.07 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 852048 -0 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 07/18/00 - $33.49 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS ENERGY 852048 -0 VERNON SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT < *> $39,225.80* 07/18/00 $15.98 RELIANT ENERGY - MINNEGA HEAT 072600 212440 07/18/00 07/18/00 212441 07/18/00 212442 07/18/00 212443 07/18/00 212444 07/18/00 $1,235.00 RAYMOND HAEG PLUMBING $402.00 RAYMOND HAEG PLUMBING $1,637.00* $34.04 RDO EQUIPMENT CO $34.04* $99.00 RECYCOOL $99.00* RUN GAS LINE TO OUTSI 06/20 ART CENTER BLD PROF SERVICES 9042 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 06/20/00 ART CENTER BLD CONTR REPAIRS 9069 SEAL RECYCLING SERVICE $38.97 RED ROOSTER AUTO STORES VALVE $38.97* $468.00 REIMER, MARK $468.00* SOFTBALL UMPIRE 113374 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1811 3006192 SUPERV. & OVRH HAZ. WASTE DIS 1646 8679482 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI 2048 071000 EDINA ATHLETIC PROF SERVICES 212446 07/18/00 $145.04 RELIANT ENERGY - MINNEGA HEAT 072600 FIRE DEPT. GEN HEAT 07/18/00 $37.71 RELIANT ENERGY - MINNEGA HEAT 072600 YORK FIRE STAT HEAT 07/18/00 $82.98 RELIANT ENERGY - MINNEGA HEAT 072600 CITY HALL GENE HEAT 07/18/00 $556.95 RELIANT ENERGY - MINNEGA HEAT 072600 PW BUILDING HEAT 07/18/00 $850.44 RELIANT ENERGY - MINNEGA HEAT 072600 BUILDING MAINT HEAT 07/18/00 $228.22 RELIANT ENERGY - MINNEGA HEAT 072600 ART CENTER BLD HEAT 07/18/00 $7,367.49 RELIANT ENERGY - MINNEGA HEAT 072600 POOL OPERATION HEAT 07/18/00 $103.60 RELIANT ENERGY - MINNEGA HEAT 072600 CLUB HOUSE HEAT 07/18/00 $31.34 RELIANT ENERGY - MINNEGA HEAT 072600 MAINT OF COURS HEAT 07/18/00 $766.52 RELIANT ENERGY - MINNEGA HEAT 072600 GOLF DOME HEAT 07/18/00 $16.41 RELIANT ENERGY - MINNEGA HEAT 072600 FRED RICHARDS HEAT 07/18/00 $3,040.07 RELIANT ENERGY - MINNEGA HEAT 072600 ARENA BLDG /GRO HEAT 07/18/00 $25.55 RELIANT ENERGY - MINNEGA HEAT 072600 POOL TRACK GRE HEAT 07/18/00 $115.00 RELIANT ENERGY - MINNEGA HEAT 072600 CENTENNIAL LAX HEAT 07/18/00 $376.20 RELIANT ENERGY - MINNEGA HEAT 072600 PUMP & LIFT ST HEAT 07/18/00 $1,029.53 RELIANT ENERGY - MINNEGA HEAT 072600 DISTRIBUTION HEAT 07/18/00 $9.59 RELIANT ENERGY - MINNEGA HEAT 072600 50TH ST OCCUPA HEAT 07/18/00 $15.98 RELIANT ENERGY - MINNEGA HEAT 072600 YORK OCCUPANCY HEAT 07/18/00 $20.93 RELIANT ENERGY - MINNEGA HEAT 072600 VERNON OCCUPAN HEAT < *> $14,819.55* 212447 07/18/00 $35.65 RICKERT, DAVID CRAFT SUPPLIES 061900 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES 2OUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 12 -JUL -2000 (15:29) page 28 =HECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <*> $35.65* 212448 07/18/00 $81.4 0 RIEGERT, RON_ FUEL REIMBURSEMENT 070500 POLICE DEPT. G MILEAGE < *> $81.40* 212449 07/18/00 $19.25 RISK MANAGEMENT ALTERNAT JUNE COLLECTION LETTE 55187701 GENERAL FD PRO AMBULANCE FEES < *> $19.25* 212450 07/18/00 $31.23 RITZ CAMERA CENTERS PHOTO FINISHING 03750984 FIRE DEPT. GEN PHOTO SUPPLIES 3710 07/18/00 $7.44 RITZ CAMERA CENTERS CAMERA E81 03750019 FIRE DEPT. GEN PHOTO SUPPLIES 3710 07/18/00 -$1.49 RITZ CAMERA CENTERS MISC 37500194 FIRE DEPT. GEN PHOTO SUPPLIES 07/18/00 $13.09 RITZ CAMERA CENTERS PHOTO FINISHING 03750060 FIRE DEPT. GEN PHOTO SUPPLIES 3710 07/18/00 $7.44 RITZ CAMERA CENTERS CAMERA E81 03750112. FIRE DEPT. GEN PHOTO SUPPLIES 3710 07/18/00 $10.75 RITZ CAMERA CENTERS PHOTO FINISHING 03750112 FIRE DEPT. GEN PHOTO SUPPLIES 3710 < *> $68.46* 212451 07/18/00 $4.50 RIVER.BEND BUSINESS METR TONER DELIVERY CHG. 601252 FIRE DEPT. GEN PROF SERVICES < *> $4.50* 212452 07/18/00 $479.25 ROC INC. CLEANING 2209 GRILL SVC CONTR EQUI 6034 07/18/00 $479.25 ROC INC. CLEANING 2210 GRILL SVC CONTR EQUI 6034 < *> $958.50* 212453 07/18/00 $168.74 ROCHESTER MIDLAND SANITATION 00346035 CLUB HOUSE RUBBISH REMOVA 6341 < *> $168.74* 212454 07/18/00 $55.00 ROSENTHAL, TAMI NATURE CAMP REFUND 062800 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F < *> $55.00* 212455 07/18/00 $5.00 ROSS, KIM FIELD TRIP REFUND 070700 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F < *> $5.00* 212456 07/18/00 $150.00 RUGGIEIO, WENDY SEASON TICKET REFUND 0710,00 SWIM PROG SEASON TICKETS < *> $150.00* 212457 07/18/00 $437.24 SAMARITAN TIRE - WHOLESALE TIRES 017681 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES 1645 < *> $437.24* 212458 07/18/00 $55.19 SANKEY, MOREAU J ROOM RENT - 5/24 & 25 063000 ASSESSING CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $55.19* 212459 07/18/00 $278.99 SCAN AIR FILTER MASTER SEAL,.FILTERS 69585 BUILDING MAINT REPAIR PARTS 1859 < *> $278.99* 212460 07/18/00 $94.75. SCHMIT, PETER M. REPAIR COST TO AUTO 062800 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $94.75* 212461 07/18/00 $105.80 SCHULER, NEIL REIMBURSEMENT FOR PLA 070600 CENTENNIAL LAK TREES FLWR SHR < *> $105.80* 212462 07/18/00 $534.90 SEABOARD PENCIL COMPANY GOLF PENCILS 1853 GOLF ADMINISTR GENERAL SUPPLI 6108 < *> $534.90* 212463 07/18/00 $203.28 SEARS HAND TOOLS 2428333 PUMP & LIFT ST TOOLS 1871 < *> $203.28* COUNCIL CHECK _ _jISTER 12 -JUL -2000 (1 j) page 29 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 212464 07/18/00 $100.17 SEELYE PLASTICS PVC VALVES, UNIONS, N 565350 WATER TREATMEN REPAIR PARTS 1660 07/18/00 $20.55 SEELYE PLASTICS TUBING, PVC PIPE 566453 WATER TREATMEN GENERAL SUPPLI 1776 < *> $120.72* 212465 07/18/00 $19,341.32 SEH ENG. DESIGN SERVICES 0065463 TH100 & W 77TH CIP < *> $19,341.32* 212466 07/18/00 $9,052.50 SERCO LABORATORIES WATER QUALITY REPORT 87608 DISTRIBUTION PROF SERVICES 5280 < *> $9,052.50* 212467 07/18/00 $25.00 SESAC INC. LICENSE 1641269 ARENA ADMINIST DUES & SUBSCRI 8039 < *> $25.00* 212468 07/18/00 $734.40 SGN ARCHITECT FEES 1691 PARK CIP CIP CONTRACT < *> $734.40* 212469 07/18/00 $60.00 Shahriar, Sima LEARN TO SWIM REFUND 063000 SWIM INSTRUCT REGISTRATION F < *> $60.00* 212470 07/18/00 $286.72 SHORT, MICHAEL CAR RENTAL REIMBURSEM 062600 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $286.72* 212471 07/18/00 $70.00 SHUTTERS 'N SHADES SHUTTER REPAIR 94 FRED RICHARDS CONTR REPAIRS 6101 < *> $70.00* 212472 07/18/00 $135.00 SMITH & WESSON CAMERAS S &W LAW ENFORCEMENT C 2354 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI 3075 < *> $135.00* 212473 07/18/00 $83.85 SMITH, AMY MILEAGE 070600 GOLF ADMINISTR MILEAGE < *> $83.85* 212474 07/18/00 $25.00 SMITH, KAY MUSIC GROUP 070700 ADAPTIVE RECRE PROF SERVICES < *> $25.00* 212475 07/18/00 $50.69 SNAP -ON INDUSTRIAL WRENCH 21531071 EQUIPMENT OPER TOOLS 1801 < *> $50.69* 212476 07/18/00 $1,450.00 SOLESBEE'S SET FOR A 446B 63949 UTILITY PROG MACH. & EQUIP 1404 < *> $1,450.00* 212477 07/18/00 $839.78 SOUTH TOWN REFRIGERATION GENERAL REPAIRS 113046 YORK OCCUPANCY CONTR REPAIRS < *> $839.78* 212478 07/18/00 $1,436.95 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 108184 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 07/18/00 $4,664.05 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 108186 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 07/18/00 $146.70 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 108187 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/00 $1,689.53 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 108428 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 07/18/00 $55.90 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 108429 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 07/18/00 $5,432.80 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 108433 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 07/18/00 $76.90 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 108434 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $13,502.83* 212479 07/18/00 $1,787.41 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CABLE CABLE COMMISSION 200012 - COMMUNICATIONS PRO SVC OTHER < *> $1,787.41* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 12 -JUL -2000 (15:29) page 30 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM - ------------------------=------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 212480 07/18/00 $363.24 SPALDING GOLF BALLS 52580081 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6217 07/18/00 $242.16 SPALDING GOLF BALLS 52580087 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6217 07/18/00 $121.58 SPALDING GOLF BALLS 52580128 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6217 07/18/00 $242.16 SPALDING GOLF BALLS 52580136 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6217 07/18/00 $161.44 SPALDING GOLF BALLS 52580143 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6217 < *> $1,130.58* 212481 07/18/00 $54.31 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LL PROPANE TANKS 062600 STREET RENOVAT GENERAL SUPPLI, < *> $54.31* 212482 07/18/00 $25.00 STATE OF MINNESOTA ELECTRICAL PERMIT 070700 INSPECTIONS GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $25.00* 212483 07/18/00 $2,619.90 STREICHERS AMMUNITION 161405.2 POLICE DEPT. G AMMUNITION 3190 07/18/00 $92.18 STREICHERS DISPOSABLE RESTRAINTS 170948.1 POLICE DEPT. G SAFETY EQUIPME 3081 < *> $2;712.08* 212484 07/18/00 $6,319.81 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIRS ON POLICE CAR 062000 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS < *> $6,319.81* 212485 07/18/00 - $21.30 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET CREDIT MEMO CM120714 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 07/18/00 - $131.97 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET CREDIT MEMO CM120810 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 07/18/00 $152.01 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET MAT, JACK ASSEMBLY 122705 -1 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1809 07/18/00 $718.55 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET PATROL CAR REPAIR CVCB3751 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP MAINT < *> $717.29* 212486 07/18/00 $82.02 SUBURBAN PROPANE LP FUEL 061700 ARENA ICE MAIN GASOLINE 8040 < *> $82.02* 212487 07/18/00 $228.81 SUN NEWSPAPERS AD FOR BID 335479 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LE 1824 07/18/00 $138.75 SUN NEWSPAPERS SPONSOR AD 338385 SPECIAL.ACTIVI GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $367.56* 212488 07/18/00 $21,175.00 SUPERIOR FORD FORD CROWN VIC 13289 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP REPLACEM 3147 07/18/00 $21,365.00 SUPERIOR FORD FORD CROWN VIC 13292 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP REPLACEM 3147 07/18/00 $21,365.00 SUPERIOR FORD FORD CROWN VIC 13291 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP REPLACEM 3147 07/18/00 $21,365.00 SUPERIOR FORD FORD CROWN VIC 13293 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP REPLACEM 3147 07/18/00. $21,365.00 SUPERIOR FORD FORD CROWN VIC 13290 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP REPLACEM 3147 < *> $106,635.00* 212489 07/18/00 $120.66 SUPERIOR MENUS TABLE SIGNS 1795332 CLUB HOUSE GENERAL SUPPLI 6064 < *> $120.66* 212490 07/18/00 - $462.00 SUTPHEN CORPORATION CREDIT MEMO 12200166 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 07/18/00 $38.70 SUTPHEN CORPORATION INSIDE DOOR HANDLE 12101976 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 1322 07/18/00 $1,047.00 SUTPHEN CORPORATION LAMPS - 12102213 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1641 < *> $623.70* 212491 07/18/00 $66.03 TAPE COMPANY, THE TAPE CASSETTES 56924453 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI 3073 < *> $66.03* 212492 07/18/00 $9.00 TARGET PLAYGROUND SUPPLIES 070500 PLAYGROUND & T GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $9.00* 212493 07/18/00 $691.00 TEEMASTER INC RESERVE SERVI 3533 GOLF ADMINISTR SVC CONTR EQUI 6344 12 -JUL -2000 (I j) page 31 COUNCIL CHECK __JISTER CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM--- - - - - -- OBJECT-- - - - -PO NUM ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <*> $691.00* 212494 07/18/00 $718.66 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO FUSES, WIRES 43683 -00 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 1786 07/18/00 $27.40 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO RED MARKER LAMP 43683 -01 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 1786 < *> $746.06* 212495 07/18/00 $784.00 'TESSMAN SEED INC ROUNDUP, FERTILIZER S029177- GENERAL TURF C WEED SPRAY 1763 < *> $784.00* 212496 07/18/00 $60.00 THOMPSON, SUZANNE SWIMMING LESSON REFUN 062800 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F < *> $60.00* 212497 07/18/00 $15,071.95 THOMSEN & NYBECK PROSECUTING 145044 LEGAL SERVICES PROF SERVICES < *> $15,071.95* 212498 07/18/00 $274.00 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP BEER 168642 GRILL CST OF GDS BEE 6345 07/18/00 $5,764.60 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 197575 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 07/18/00 $375.00 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP BEER 197807 GRILL CST OF GDS BEE 6345 07/18/00 $375.00 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP BEER 197869 GRILL CST OF GDS BEE 6345 07/18/00 $343.00 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP BEER 169235 GRILL CST OF GDS BEE 6345 07/18/00 $4,238.50 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 198215 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 07/18/00 $31.90 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 198216 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $11,402.00* 212499 07/18/00 $74.54 TILSNER, DONNA PLAYGROUND SUPPLIES. 071000 SPECIAL ACTIVI GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/00 $5.99 TILSNER, DONNA PLAYGROUND SUPPLIES 071000 PLAYGROUND & T GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $80.53* 212500 07/18/00 $148.06 TIME WARNER CABLE REPAIR CABLE DAMAGE M00 -05 -1 SNOW & ICE REM GENERAL SUPPLI 1883 < *> $148.06* 212501 07/18/00 $158.87 TITLEIST CLOTHES 0108353 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6210 07/18/00 $306.67 TITLEIST MERCHANDISE 0110946 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6210 07/18/00 $292.40 TITLEIST SHOES 0126125 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6210 07/18/00 $580.66 TITLEIST GOLF CLUBS 0138006 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6210 < *> $1,338.60* 212502 07/18/00 $25.89 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPL WELDING SUPPLIES 327844 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI 2037 07/18/00 $2.66 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPL CYLINDER RENTAL 328066 EQUIPMENT OPER WELDING SUPPLI 1377 07/18/00 $17.55 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPL WELDING SUPPLIES 429719 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $46.10* 212503 07/18/00 $750.45 TRACY /TRIPP FUELS GAS 75556 MAINT OF COURS GASOLINE 6529 07/18/00 $1,200.53 TRACY /TRIPP FUELS GASOLINE 75537 MAINT OF COURS GASOLINE 6529 07/18/00 $160.13 TRACY /TRIPP FUELS GASOLINE 75892 RICHARDS MAINT GASOLINE 6529 < *> $2,111.11* 212504 07/18/00 $246.02 TRIARCO ARTS & CRAFTS PLAYGROUND SUPPLIES 308682 PLAYGROUND & T GENERAL SUPPLI 7011 07/18/00 $115.72 TRIARCO ARTS & CRAFTS PLAYGROUND SUPPLIES 312841 PLAYGROUND & T GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $361.74* 212505 07/18/00 $351.25 TRIGG INDUSTRIES INTL IN TAPE FOR TRAFFIC COUN 12709 ENGINEERING GE GENERAL SUPPLI 4807 < *> $351.25* 212506 07/18/00 $50.00 TRUGREEN - CHEMLAWN LAWN CARE 823039 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONTR REPAIRS -'OUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 12 -JUL -2000 (15:29) page 32 HECK NO ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 212506 07/18/00 $53.25 TRUGREEN - CHEMLAWN SPRAY PW BLDG. FOR WE 825078 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 1929 07/18/00 $106.50 TRUGREEN - CHEMLAWN WEED CONTROL 825079 CITY HALL GENE PROF SERVICES 1292 07/18/00 $58.58 TRUGREEN - CHEMLAWN LAWN TREATMENT 825080 FIRE DEPT. GEN PROF SERVICES 1292 07/18/00 $106.50 TRUGREEN - CHEMLAWN WEED CONTROL 825075 GENERAL TURF C PROF SERVICES 1959 < *> $374.83* 212507 07/18/00 $102.53 TURF SUPPLY COMPANY MARKER FLAGS 076173 FIELD MAINTENA GENERAL SUPPLI 1717 07/18/00 $14.06 TURF SUPPLY COMPANY SUPPLIES 076357 RICHARDS MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 6357 07/18/00 $105.79 TURF SUPPLY COMPANY REPAIR PARTS 076358 RICHARDS MAINT REPAIR PARTS 6357 < *> $222.38* 212508 07/18/00 $985.13 TURTLE BAY BUILDING SERV JULY CLEANING FEE 336 - POOL TRACK GRE PROF SERVICES CONTRACT < *> $985.13* 212509 07/18/00 $3.3.60 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO OXYGEN 551648 - FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 3700 < *> $33.60* 212510 07/18/00 $425.47 TWIN CITY SEED CO. SEED 3005- RANGE PLANT & TREES 6353 < *> $425.47* 212511 07/18_/00 $140.00 TWIN CITY WATER CLINIC WATER ANALYSIS 6546 WATER TREATMEN PROF SERVICES 1520 < *> $140.00* 212512 07/18/00 $45.00 U S BANCORP ANNUAL FEE 070500 CONTINGENCIES PROF SERVICES < *> $45.00* 212513 07/18/00 $28.18 ULLRICH, CINDY MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 071000 ED ADMINISTRAT MILEAGE < *> $28.18* 212514 07/18/00 $887.67 UNITED ELECTRIC COMPANY LENS ASSEMBLIES 95098400 PARKING RAMP REPAIR PARTS 1669 < *> $887.67* 212515 07/18/00 - $124.64 UNITED RENTALS' EQUIPMENT RENTAL OUST# 98 BUILDING MAINT CONTR REPAIRS 07/18/00 $496.14 UNITED RENTALS REPLACE BATTERY, MAIN CUST# 11 POOL TRACK GRE CONTR REPAIRS < *> $371.50* 212516 07/18/00 $180..00 URDAHL, CATHERINE NELSON FREELANCE WRITING 062000 POOL OPERATION PROF SERVICES < *> $180.00* 212517 07/18/00 $676.83 US FOODSERVICE INC CONCESSION PRODUCT 734144 POOL CONCESSIO COST OF GD SOL 07/18/00 $545.69 US FOODSERVICE INC CONCESSIN PRODUCT 736462 POOL CONCESSIO COST OF GD SOL 07/18/00 $723.01 US FOODSERVICE INC CONCESSION PRODUCT 739824 POOL CONCESSIO COST OF GD SOL 07/18/00 $3,466.36 US FOODSERVICE INC FOOD 070200 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 07/18/00, $220.89 US FOODSERVICE INC FOIL, CUPS, MOP 070200 _ GRILL GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/00 $35.00 US FOODSERVICE INC POLISH 070200 GRILL CLEANING SUPPL 07/18/00 $1,233.28 US FOODSERVICE INC CONCESSION PRODUCT 742370 POOL CONCESSIO COST OF GD SOL 1422 07/18/00 $231.81 US FOODSERVICE INC CONCESSION PRODUCT 745129 POOL CONCESSIO COST OF GD SOL < *> $7,132.87* 212518 07/18/00 $241.54. BIG RIVER DELI & SANDWIC FOOD FOR CLASSES 041800 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $241.54* 212519 07/18/00 $111.26 VALLEY VIEW ASSOC ROTARY FLOW SWITCHES 11727 POOL OPERATION CONTR REPAIRS < *> $111.26* COUNCIL CHECK .__LISTER 12 -JUL -2000 (1_ ) page 33 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 212520 07/18/00 $369.56 VAN PAPER CO. BAGS 322652 50TH ST SELLIN PAPER SUPPLIES 7511 07/18/00 $983.53 VAN PAPER CO. BAGS 322827 YORK SELLING PAPER SUPPLIES 7512 07/18/00 $33.81 VAN PAPER CO. BAGS 323093 50TH ST SELLIN PAPER SUPPLIES 7511 07/18/00 $202.88 VAN PAPER CO. BAGS 323097 YORK SELLING PAPER SUPPLIES 7512 07/18/00 - $199.16 VAN PAPER CO. CREDIT FOR BAGS 323251 YORK SELLING PAPER SUPPLIES 7512 07/18/00 $252.41 VAN PAPER CO. ROLL TOWELS 324540 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI 2051 < *> $1,643.03* 212521 07/18/00 $265.61, VANTAGE ELECTRIC CK POOL MOTOR /INSTALL 16301 POOL TRACK GRE CONTR REPAIRS. 2106 < *> $265.61* 212522 07/18/00 $519.82 VERIZON WIRELESS BELLEVU CELLULAR PATROL /FLEX 061000 PATROL TELEPHONE 07/18/00 $204.90 VERIZON WIRELESS BELLEVU CELLULAR ADM /POLICE 061000 INVESTIGATION TELEPHONE 07/18/00 $25.30 VERIZON WIRELESS BELLEVU CELLULAR ACO 061000 ANIMAL CONTROL GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $750.02* 212523 07/18/00 $18.97 VIDEOMAKER SUBSCRIPTION 052800 MEDIA LAB DUES & SUBSCRI.9077 < *> $18.97* 212524 07/18/00 $646.46 VOGEL PAINT & WAX TRAFFIC PAINT 337856 PAVEMENT MARKI PAINT 1882 07/18/00 $914.87 VOGEL PAINT & WAX TRAFFIC PAINT 337857 PAVEMENT MARKI PAINT 1663 < *> $1,561.33* 212525 07/18/00 $487:90 VOSS LIGHTING FLORESCENT LIGHTING 2068768- STREET REVOLVI GENERAL SUPPLI 1788 07/18/00 $40.36 VOSS LIGHTING SEALED LEAD ACID 2065733 -.FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 1939 07/18/00 $307.36 VOSS LIGHTING LIGHT BULBS 2069593- PARKING RAMP REPAIR PARTS 1875 < *> $835.62* 212526 07/18/00 $482.31 WAGNER GREENHOUSES INC. PLANTS 63R2000 POOL TRACK GRE TREES FLWR SHR -2112 < *> $482.31* 212527 07/18/00 $20.37 WALSER FORD HANDLE ASSEMBLY 84521FOW EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1800. 07/18/00 $40.90 WALSER FORD CABLE ASSEMBLY 84701FOW EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1814 07/18/00 $3.7.67 WALSER FORD WHEEL COVER ASSEMBLY 84662FOW EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1810 07/18/00 - $40.90 WALSER FORD CREDIT MEMO CM84701F EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1814 < *> $58.04* 212528 07/18/00 $87.46 WATERSTREET,.JOAN M MISC CONFERENCE EXPEN 062900 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $87.46* 212529 07/18/00 $341.19 - WEST WELD SUPPLY CO. DRILL BITS, TAPS 32441 PUMP & LIFT ST TOOLS 1833 < *> $341.19* 212530 07/18/00 $35.63 WESTBURNE SUPPLY INC CAPACITOR 2149476 ART CENTER BLD REPAIR PARTS 1926 07/18/00 $51.43 WESTBURNE SUPPLY INC SEAT, STORM COLLAR 2149693 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 1866 07/18/00 $19.00 WESTBURNE SUPPLY INC FLASHING 2149693 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 07/18/00 $103.18 WESTBURNE SUPPLY INC MOTOR 2150378 ART CENTER BLD REPAIR PARTS 1869 < *> $209.24* 212531 07/18/00 $130.00 WHITE; NICOLE PROGRAM COORDINATOR 070700 ADAPTIVE RECRE PROF SERVICES < *> $130.00* 212532 07/18/00 $130.00 WIGEN COMPANIES INC. CONTRACTED REPAIR 5573 POOL OPERATION CONTR REPAIRS < *> $130.00* :OUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 12 -JUL -2000 (15:29) page 34 HECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 212533 07/18/00 $143.61 WILLIAMS STEEL & HARDWAR SPRAY PAINT 922153 -0 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 1924 < *> $143.61* 212534 07/18/00 - $35.00 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 041823 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 07/18/00 $1,081.50 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 042141 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 07/18/00 $1,697.65 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 042151 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 07/18/00 $579.80 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS.SOLD WI 042152 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 07/18/00 $928.55 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 042181 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 07/18/00- $750.00 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 042421 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 07/18/00 $694.60 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 042425 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 07/18/00 $826.10 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 042426 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $6,523.20* 212535 07/18/00 $1,469.38 WINE MERCHANTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 30808 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 07/18/00 $1,098.44 WINE MERCHANTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 30809 YORK SELLING CST OF -GD WINE 07/18/00 $809.55 WINE MERCHANTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 30810 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 07/18/00 $330.68 WINE MERCHANTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 30980 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 07/18/00 $371.68 WINE MERCHANTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 30981 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $4,079.73* 212536 07/18/00 $92'.60 WINSTAR BROADBAND SERVIC COPS GRANT - CDPD 262793 COPS MORE GRAN EQUIP REPLACEM < *> $92.60* 212537 07/18/00 $60.00 WM H MCCOY KEROSENE 070974 MAINT OF COURS GASOLINE 6496 < *> $60.00* 212538 07/18/00 $53.93 WOOLRICH INC CLOTHES 217447 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6433 07/18/00 $450.41 WOOLRICH INC MERCHANDISE 218252 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6433 < *> $504.34* 212539 07/18/00 $1,284.00 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 95051 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 07/18/00 $83.00 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF,GOODS SOLD WI 95056 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 07/18/00 $219.00 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 95121 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF.GD WINE 07/18/00 $367.00 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 95270 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 07/18/00 $522.00 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 95278 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 07/18/00 $207.00 WORLD CLASS.WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 95282 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD;WINE < *> $2,682.00* 212540 07/18/00 $299.00 WORLD WATERPARK ASSOCIAT NATIONAL CONFERENCE 062600 POOL ADMIN CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $299.00* 212541 07/18/00 $367.77 XEROX CORPORATION RENTAL AGREEMENT 07552902 POLICE DEPT. G SVC CONTR EQUI CONTRACT 07/18/00 $734.85 XEROX CORPORATION TONER - COPIER 17303822 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $1,102.62* 212542 07/18/00 $189.23 Yellow Freight Systems I SHIPPING CHARGES 300 -3641 RANGE REPAIR PARTS 6104 < *> $189.23* 212543 07/18/00 $157.79 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE FIRST AID 54163657 FRED RICHARDS GENERAL SUPPLI 6109 < *> $157.79* $1,511,393.55* COUNCIL CHECK - ..4ARY 12 -JUL -2000 (1 ,2) page 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ FUND # 10 GENERAL FUND $362,837.45 FUND # 11 COMMUNITY DEVELP. BLOCK GR $74.00 FUND # 12 COMMUNICATIONS $2,042.69 FUND # 15 WORKING CAPITAL $26,687.09 FUND # 23 ART CENTER $6,032.47 FUND # 25 GOLF DOME FUND $2,231.52 FUND # 26 SWIMMING POOL FUND $21,300.27 FUND # 27 GOLF COURSE FUND $52,412.23 FUND # 28 ICE ARENA FUND $45,976.31 FUND # 30 EDINBOROUGH /CENTENNIAL LAK $32,409.41 FUND # 40 UTILITY FUND $316,043.12 FUND # 41 STORM SEWER UTILITY FUND $743.47 FUND # 42 RECYCLING PROGRAM $37,935.20 FUND # 50 LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND $303,905.12 FUND # 60 CONSTRUCTION FUND $300,763.20 $1,511,393.55* COUNCIL CHECK ISTER 03 -JUL -2000 (. 22) page 1 CHECK NO CHECK DT CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 208471 06/09/00 $320,000.00 CITY OF EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 060900 LIQUOR PROG CASH 06109100 - $320,000.00 CITY OF EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 060900 LIQUOR PROG CASH < *> $0.00* 208472 06/16/00 $1,645.27 LANTZ LAUGHLIN UPHOLSTE REUPHOLSTER KITCHEN C 42400 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONTR REPAIRS < *> $1,645.27* 208473 06/23/00 $150,000.00 CITY OF EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 062300 LIQUOR PROG CASH 06/23/00 - $150,000.00 CITY OF EDINA PAYROLL TRANSFER 062300 LIQUOR PROG CASH < *> $0.00* 211191 06/05/00 $51.10 OFFICE DEPOT LABELS 31011816 PRO SHOP GENERAL SUPPLI 6023 < *> $51.10* 211192 06/05/00 $5,121.18 PERA POLICE RETRO CONTRIBU 053100 GENERAL FD PRO P.E.R.A. PAYAB < *> $5,121.18* 211193 06/05/00 $2,974.38 POSTMASTER ABOUT TOWN POSTAGE 060200 COMMUNICATIONS MAG /NEWSLET EX < *> $2,974.38* 211194 06/05/00 $100.00 STROH, STEVE HIGH SCHOOL GRAD.-SUP 053000 POLICE DEPT. G MEETING EXPENS < *> $100.00* 211195 06/05/00 $35.84 U S BANCORP MATERIALS AT ROCKLER 052500 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $35.84* 211196 06/05/00 $112.22 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 052500 PUMP & LIFT ST.TELEPHONE 06/05/00 $54.22 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 052500 DARE TELEPHONE 06/05/00 $2,829.39 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 052500 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE < *> $2,995.83* 211197 06/12/00 $9.00 DRIVER & VEHICLE SERVIC LICENSES & PERMITS 06 -07 -00 EQUIPMENT OPER LIC & PERMITS < *> $9.00* 211198 06/12/00 $9.00 DRIVER & VEHICLE SERVIC LICENSES & PERMITS 06/07/00 EQUIPMENT OPER LIC & PERMITS < *> $9.00* 211199 06/12/00 $9.00 DRIVER & VEHICLE SERVIC LICENSES & PERMITS 06/07/20 EQUIPMENT OPER LIC & PERMITS < *> $9.00* 211200 06/12/00 $450.00 KPMG LLP PROFESSIONAL SERV - A 40279114 POOL ADMIN PRO SVC AUDIT 06/12/00 $1,100.00 KPMG LLP PROFESSIONAL SERV - A 40279114 ARENA ADMINIST PRO SVC AUDIT 06/12/00 $1,600.00 KPMG LLP PROFESSIONAL SERV - A 40279114 IBR #2 PROG PRO SVC AUDIT < *> $3,150.00* 211201 06/12/00 $60.23 OFFICEMAX CREDIT PLAN GENERAL SUPPLIES 9454 ED ADMINISTRAT GENERAL SUPPLI 06/12/00 $5.32 OFFICEMAX CREDIT PLAN GENERAL SUPPLIES 6537 COMMUNICATIONS GENERAL SUPPLI 06/12/00 $5.32 OFFICEMAX CREDIT PLAN GENERAL SUPPLIES 8538 COMMUNICATIONS GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $70.87* 211202 06/12/00 $63,343.51 PERA P.E.R.A. PAYABLE 06/12/00 GENERAL FD PRO P.E.R.A. PAYAB < *> $63,343.51* 211203 06/12/00 $19.62 PERA P.E.R.A. PAYABLE 06 -12 -00 GENERAL FD PRO P.E.R.A. PAYAB < *> $19.62* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 03 -JUL -2000 (12:22) page 2 CHECK NO CHECK DT CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 211204 06/12/00 $132.00 POSTMASTER POSTAGE 06 -09 -00 CENT SVC GENER POSTAGE < *> $132.00* 211205 06/12/00 $150.00 SCOTT COUNTY SHERRIFF'S DUE TO OTHER GOVERNME 06/05/00 GENERAL,FD PRO DUE TO OTHR GO < *> $15.0.00* 211206 06/12/00 $233.86 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 05/28/00 ARENA BLDG /GRO TELEPHONE 06/12/00 $59.48 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 06 -01 -00 PUMP & LIFT ST TELEPHONE 06/12/00 $82.48 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 06 -01 -20 YORK FIRE STAT TELEPHONE 06/12/00 $53.75 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 06/01/00 SKATING & HOCK TELEPHONE 06/12/QO $57.42 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 06/01/20 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE 06/12/00 $994.98 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 6 -1 -00 GENERAL STORM TELEPHONE 06/12/00 $122.00 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 6/1/00 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE < *> $1,603.97* 211207 06/12/00 $27.83 VERIZON WIRELESS BELLEV TELEPHONE 05/20/00 ED ADMINISTRAT TELEPHONE < *> $27.83* 211676 06/19/00 $1,486.18 BACHMAN'S PLANTS 8503314, CENTENNIAL LAK TREES FLWR SHR 06/19/00 $288.87 BACHMAN'S REPLACEMENT TREES 8503314, TREES & MAINTE PLANT & TREES < *> $1,775.05* 211677 06/19/00 $489.90 FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY SECURITY ALARM 604194 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $489.90* 211678 06/19/00 $228.68 GO SPORTSMEN'S SUPPLY I NYLON SWING, SWIVELS 97925 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP REPLACEM < *> $228.68* 211679 06/19/00 $7,116.00 HONEYWELL INC. ENERGY SERVICES CONTR 259HB470 ARENA ADMINIST PROF SERVICES 06/19/00 $3,488.00 HONEYWELL INC. ENERGY SERVICES CONTR 259HB470 GOLF DOME SVC CONTR EQUI 06/19/00 $3,349.00 HONEYWELL INC. ENERGY SERVICES CONTR 259HB470 ED BUILDING & SVC CONTR EQUI < *> $13,953.00* 211680 06/19/00 $625,000.00 HRA /CITY OF EDINA HRA ADVANCE 061900 GENERAL FD PRO DUE FROM HRA < *> $625,000.00* 211681 06/19/00 $200.00 PETERSON, DOROTHY TAP ACCOMPANIST 061200 SENIOR CITIZEN PROF SERVICES < *> $200.00* 211682 06/19/00 $285.00 POSTMASTER MONTHLY MAILING OF NE 061200 CENT SVC GENER POSTAGE < *> $285.00* 211683 06/19/00 $100.00 STROH, STEVE 4TH OF JULY SUPPLIES 061600 CONTINGENCIES GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $100.00* 211684 06/19/00 $500.00 TILSNER, DONNA PETTY CASH ADVANCE 061500 PLAYGROUND & T GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $500.00* 211685 06/19/00 $110.76 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 060100 BUILDING MAINT TELEPHONE 06/19/00 $196.24 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 060400 PUMP & LIFT ST TELEPHONE < *> $307.00* 211686 06/19/00 $480.00 VASCHO, MAXEEN TAP INSTRUCTOR 061200 SENIOR CITIZEN PROF SERVICES < *> $480.00* 106 Sr - COUNCIL CHEC SISTER 03 -JUL -2000 , -e.:22) page 3 CHECK NO -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CHECK DT CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. 211687 06/19/00 $250.00 WASHINGTON COUNTY OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 061400 GENERAL FD PRO DUE TO OTHR GO < *> $250.00* 211688 06/26/00 $299.76 AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPA LAUNDRY 05 -31 -00 FIRE DEPT. GEN LAUNDRY 06/26/00 $106.50 AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPA LAUNDRY 05 -31 -00 50TH ST OCCUPA LAUNDRY 06/26/00 $94.62 AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPA LAUNDRY 05 -31 -00 YORK OCCUPANCY LAUNDRY 06/26/00 $106.50 AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPA LAUNDRY 05 -31 -00 VERNON OCCUPAN LAUNDRY 06/26/00 $19.43 AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPA LAUNDRY 05 -31 -00 LABORATORY LAUNDRY 06/26/00 $261.38 AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPA LAUNDRY 05 -31 -00 CITY HALL GENE LAUNDRY < *> $888.19* 211689 06/26/00 $15.27 AT &T TELEPHONE 05/31/00 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE < *> $15.27* 211690 06/26/00 $8.16 AT &T TELEPHONE 05/04/00 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE 06/26/00 $15.70 AT &T TELEPHONE 06 -03 -00 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE 06/26/00 06/26/00 $15.70 $15.70 AT &T AT &T TELEPHONE 06/03/00 DISTRIBUTION TELEPHONE < *> $55.26* TELEPHONE 06/04/00 ED ADMINISTRAT TELEPHONE 211691 06/26/00 $230.04 BACHMAN'S PLANTINGS & TREES 3901907 TREES & MAINTE PLANT & TREES < *> $230.04* 211692 06/26/00 $9,718.80 DELTA DENTAL 7/00 PREMIUMS 06/21/00 CENT SVC GENER HOSPITALIZATIO < *> $9,718.80* 211693 06/26/00 $200.00 FREEBORN COUNTY WARRANT #99021861 06/20/00 GENERAL FD PRO DUE TO OTHR GO < *> $200.00* 211694 06/26/00 $1.22 GLOBAL CROSSING TELECOM 0204100929 05/26/00 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE 06/26/00 $571.55 GLOBAL CROSSING TELECOM 0203192164 06/14/00 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE < *> $572.77* 211695 06/26/00 $383.40 LASER QUIPT SERVICE CONTRACTS EQU 87171 CENT SVC GENER SVC CONTR EQUI 06/26/00 $138.40 LASER QUIPT DATA PROCESSING 87172 POLICE DEPT. G DATA PROCESSIN < *> $521.80* 211696 06/26/00 $3,166.21 MEDICA PREM 07/00 LOW OPTION 06/21/00 CENT SVC GENER HOSPITALIZATIO < *> $3,166.21* 211697 06/26/00 $23,674.70 MEDICA PREM 07/00 ELECT OPTI 06 -21 -00 CENT SVC GENER HOSPITALIZATIO < *> $23,674.70* 211698 06/26/00 $66,868.90 MEDICA PREM 07/00 HIGH OPTIO 062100 CENT SVC GENER HOSPITALIZATIO < *> $66,868.90* 211699 06/26/00 $62,429.17 PERA CONTRIBUTION PPE 06/2 06/26/00 GENERAL FD PRO P.E.R.A. PAYAB < *> $62,429.17* 211700 06/26/00 $19.62 PERA CONTRIBUTION PPE 06/2 06 -26 -00 GENERAL FD PRO P.E.R.A. PAYAB < *> $19.62* 211701 06/26/00 $460.50 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT COMME GENERAL SUPPLIES 06/22/00 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $460.50* :OUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 03 -JUL -2000 (12:22) page 4 :HECK NO CHECK DT CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. -------------------=---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 211702 06/26/00 $190.64 U S BANCORP GENERAL SUPPLIES 06 -20 -00 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI i 06/26/00 $137.39 U S BANCORP GENERAL SUPPLIES 06 -20 -00 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 06/26/00 $176.79 U S BANCORP MEETING EXPENSE 06720- 00,FIRE DEPT. GEN MEETING EXPENS 06/26/00 $518.00 U S BANCORP TRG 11 /00 06/20/00 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $1,022.82* .211703 06/26/00 $4- ,000.00 U.S. POSTAL SERVICE ACCT # 75983 06/23/00 CENT SVC GENER POSTAGE < *> $4,000.00* 211704 06/26/00 $566.80 US WEST DEX ADVERTISING OTHER 06/19/00 ED ADMINISTRAT ADVERT OTHER 06/26/00 $52.55 US WEST DEX ADVERTISING OTHER 06/19/00 ART CENTER ADM ADVERT OTHER 06/26/00 $106.40 US WEST DEX TELEPHONE 06/19/00 FRED RICHARDS_.TELEPHONE 06/26/00 $101.20 US WEST DEX TELEPHONE 06/19/00 ARENA BLDG /GRO TELEPHONE 06/26/00 $347.20 US WEST DEX TELEPHONE 06/19/00 CLUB HOUSE TELEPHONE 06/26/00 $132.60 US WEST DEX ADVERTISING OTHER 06/19/00 GOLF DOME ADVERT OTHER < *> $1,306.75* 211705 06/26/00 $135.75 VERIZON WIRELESS BELLEV TELEPHONE 06/10/00 INSPECTIONS TELEPHONE 06/26/00 $5.67 VERIZON WIRELESS BELLEV TELEPHONE 06/10/00 PUBLIC HEALTH TELEPHONE 06/26/00 $186.89 VERIZON WIRELESS BELLEV TELEPHONE 06/10/00 FIRE DEPT. GEN TELEPHONE 06/26/00 $70.01 VERIZON WIRELESS BELLEV TELEPHONE 06/10/00 ADMINISTRATION TELEPHONE 06/26/00 $20.14 VERIZON WIRELESS BELLEV TELEPHONE 06/10/00 COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 06/26/00 $86.45 VERIZON WIRELESS BELLEV TELEPHONE 06/10/00 PARK ADMIN. TELEPHONE 06/26/00 $96.23 VERIZON WIRELESS BELLEV TELEPHONE 06/10/00 PARK MAINTENAN TELEPHONE 06/26/00 $7.81 VERIZON WIRELESS BELLEV TELEPHONE 06/10/00 TREES & MAINTE TELEPHONE 06/26/00 $14.19 VERIZON WIRELESS BELLEV TELEPHONE 06/10/00 CLUB HOUSE TELEPHONE 06/26/00 $161.90 VERIZON WIRELESS BELLEV TELEPHONE 06/10/00 DISTRIBUTION TELEPHONE 06/26/00 $262.86 VERIZON WIRELESS BELLEV TELEPHONE 06/10/00 ENGINEERING GE TELEPHONE 06/26/00 $222.74 VERIZON WIRELESS BELLEV TELEPHONE 06/10/00 SUPERV. & OVRH TELEPHONE < *> $1,270.64* 211706 06/26/00 $939.96 WELSH COMPANIES INC 07/01/00 YORK STORE 06/26/00 YORK OCCUPANCY PROF SERVICES < *> $939.96* $902,378.43* COUNCIL CHECK . .,MARY FOR HAND CHECKS 12 -JUL -2000 (. 21) page 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ FUND # 10 GENERAL FUND $876,286.33 FUND # 12 COMMUNICATIONS $3,005.16 FUND # 23 ART CENTER $52.55 FUND # 25 GOLF DOME FUND $3,620.60 FUND # 26 SWIMMING POOL FUND $450.00 FUND # 27 GOLF COURSE FUND $518.89 FUND # 28 ICE ARENA FUND $8,551.06 FUND # 30 EDINBOROUGH /CENTENNIAL LAK $5,505.74 FUND # 40 UTILITY FUND $545.54 FUND # 41 STORM SEWER UTILITY FUND $994.98 FUND # 50 LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND $1,247.58 FUND # 66 IMP BOND REDEMPTION #2 $1,600.00 $902,378.43* JUL -14 -2000 08:02 —FSH ADMIN 16129245382 P.02iO3 , 0111 FAIRVIEW Fairview Southdale Hospital 6401 France Avenue South Edina, MN 55435-2199 Tel 612 -924 -5000 July 13, 2000 The Honorable Dennis Ma.etzold Edina City Council 4801 West 50 "' Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Fairview Southdale Parking Ramp 3`.V3 1 commission No. 1999.101.02 Dear Mayor Maetzold: This recent Monday, July 10, 2000, Rick Dahl and Brian Buchholz of BWBR Architects, along with Daniel Weber of Fairview Southdale, met with representatives of Point of France including Board Chair Norb Weninger, Rivoli Golden, Building Manager Carl Weisser, and their consulting architect Pete Sieger. The purpose of the meeting was to articulate for the architects the concerns Point of France had for the design of the ramp, and to collectively arrive at agreement on improvements to the design that both parties support. The resulting outcome was very successful and Fairvi,.w Southdale plans to move quickly to incorporate Point of France's suggestions. The issues of concern included headlights, materials and general appearance of the ramp. BVdBR shared with POF a study they recently completed surveying the height of vehicle headlights. The Ford Excursion was identified as the largest sport utility vehicle manufactured. Its headlights are at a height of 39" (3'- 3"). The spandrels on the ramp as currently designed are at 42" (3'-6 ") above the parking deck. This spandrel height, coupled with a number of other mitigating factors (i.e. vehicle headlights are designed to point in a downward direction, vehicles moving within the ramp travel in a predominantly east -west direction, the ramp and POF are 400' apart, with other structures and vegetation between them) address the concerns of headlights. Point of France stated the ratio of solid -to -void appeared too light, and that brining more solid to the ramp would help it to read more like a building, less like a ramp. Fairview Southdale agreed to add 4" of additional concrete to the spandrels on the south side, bringing the spandrel height to 48" above the parking deck. The merits of poured -in -place concrete versus precast concrete spandrels were discussed. Inherent in precast concrete is Elie ability to control the product in an enclosed shop environment. Poured in place can also produce high quality results. particularly when receiving a finish coat of a cementitious or elastomeric material. The poured - in -place also provides a better performin_ structure over the long term. Point of France found the proposed poured - in -place concrete spandrels with an architectural finish, such as manufacturers including Thoroseal or Sro offer, to be acceptable. Tile color of Elie spandrels as represented in the computer images (same as those submitted in the May 2 Council packet) was accepted by Point of France. A suggestion was made to add a course texture treatment to the wider center band in the spandrel. This band is of a darker color and is recessed 318" from the top and bottom bands. This change in plane znd texture variety will add visual interest to the ramp. JUL -14 -2000 08:02 —FSH ADMIN 16129245302 P.03iO3 The final suggestion addressed the concern of the apparent hori2ontality of the ramp. Unique treatment, perhaps at every third column, would help bring some relief to the uninterrupted horizontality. It was suggested each third column be brought out flush with the face of The spandrel, allowing the other columns to recced as they are set back a few- inches_ BGVBR will work with Knutson Construction in identifying ways to uniquely treat four columns along the south side of the ramp. In summary, the following physical changes will be incorporated into the ramp: • Four inches of concrete will be added To the spandrel height on the south side of the ramp, A course: [exture will be introduced to the center band of the spandrels, and • Unique treatment will be applied at four columns on the ramp's south side. Once again, we are delighted with the outcome of this cooperative working session, and appreciate Council's consideration in supporting the mutually beneficial results. Sincerely, Mark M. Enger Senior Vice President and Administrator cc: Daniel Weber, FSH Rick Dahl. BWBR Pete Sieger, TSP Gordon Hughes, City Manager TOTAL P.03 d 07/14/00 12:19 FAX 651 222 8961 BWBR ARCHITECTS %%Ndp BWBR Architects "MEMORANDUM TO: Craig Larson, City of Edina Mark Enger, Fairview Southdale Hospital Daniel Weber, Fairview Southdale Hospital Rod West, Knutson Construction Darin Knapp, Knutson Construction Tom Amundson, ERA Ron Laughlin, BWBR Jay Sleiter, BWBR Brian Buchholz, BWBR FROM: Rick Dahl, BWBR SUBJECT: Parking Ramp Description DATE: July 14, 2000 Z 002/019 Fairview Southdale Hospital Parking Ramp BWBR COMMISSION NO. 1999. 141.0: The purpose of this memorandurrt is to clarify the quality level that can be expected with the poured -in -place concrete spandrels with elastomeric coating. 1. The attached technical specification sections describe in full detail the level of quality required for the parking ramp spandrels. The summary below attempts to decribe in layman's terms how this high quality level will be achieved. a. The formwork specified includes medium - density overlay (MDO) plywood, fiberglass or steel. MDO plywood does not allow visible wood grain. The other two acceptable formworks have no texture. The specs call for no irregularities or visible form joint marks on exposed surfaces. b. Following removal of formwork, if irregularities are found, voids, form -tie holes and pockets must be filled, and fins or projections must be rubbed down. c. The concrete spandrels will then receive a leveler surface preparation baseeoat. d. Next, the surface receives two coats of the elastomeric finish, first a primer, then a finish coat, This is spray - applied. The same application process is used for the smooth and course sand - textured finish. Because the finish is a factory- produced coating, the consistency of color is unmatched. The applicator will be responsible for the consistency of texture. Given the smooth substrate created with the poured -in -place concrete, the applicator's experience level as mandated by the specifications, and quality control measures utilized throughout the construction, such as pre - construction meetings and on -going site observation, the final product is expected to be a high quality archiectural finish. Also inherent in the integrally poured spandrels is a better performing product, absent of exposed weld plates vulnerable to corrosion and staining as is the case with precast concrete spandrels. BWBR Archltecls, Inc. 400 Siblor Stroct -6010 600 51. Paul, Minnesota 55101 tol; 651.222.3701 /e.. — 117 AO I 00 -07- 14adIne r 07/14/00 12:19 FAX 651 222 5961 BFIBR ARCHITECTS 16003/019 2. The concrete pilasters as discussed with Point of France will be formed out of cast -in -place concrete and will receive the smooth finish elastomeric coating. This will help to achieve POF's request to establish a rhythm of verticality to provide relief to the strong horizontaliry. The attached elevation shows which columns receive this treatment. End of memo. BWBR Arcnitecle. Inc. . 400 Sibley Street Suite 600 St. Paul. Minnesota 55101 lei: 661.222 -3701 7114100 - Pa0e 2 — — — e0a7.14edi- p 07/14/00 12: 20 FAX 651 222 8961 BWBR ARCHITECTS 004 /019 N YCONSTANT Y5LPE 14' 145 %1 Pr-- 314 VERTICAL GONT L JOINTS AT f`11DPOINT BETWEEN GRIDS GHA1N ;o* HEIGHT RESTRICTION BARS (10 'LONG) CAST -IN -PLACE CONCRETE PILASTER LIGHT TAUPE SMOOTH FINISH TOP AND BOTTOM BAND COLOR LIGHT TAUPE SMOOTH F IN15H LANDSCAPE BERM MIDDLE BAND COLOR DARK TAUPE COARSE SAND FINISH Sheet Title Drown Dote Comm. No. Sheet No. MATERIAL FIN15H CCL 1.1400 1399.101 .02 1 Project FAIRVIEW SOUTHDALE PARKING RAMP EDINA, MN 400 Sibley Street, SuiLe 500 Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 651- 222 -9701 Copyright BY.SR 4rchita Ls %%%f ECTS 07/14100 12:20 FAX 651 222 3961 J - -� CAST -IN -PLACE CONCRETE SPANDRELS FINISHED WITH ACRTLIC COATING CAST -IN -PLACE CONCRETE PILASTER LIGHT TAUPE SMOOTH FINISH BRBR ARCHITECTS — "CUTOFF" LIGHT FIXTURE 16005/01s FLAT I f \ I I I \ I COLUMNS PAINTED WITH r1 —� - -- �--r-- WITH ACRYLIC COATING Q Q LIGHT TAUPE f fA 1 ui Sheet Title Drown Date Comm. No. Sheet No. MATERIAL FINISH CCL 1.14 .00 1999.101.02 2 Project FAIRVIEW SOUTHDALE PARKING RAMP EDINA, MN Sibley Street. Suite 50 Saint Salnt Paul, Minnesota 55101 �t 651 —ZZZ -9701 911011 A rM AOT8 Copyright SY.3R 4rchilccls THOMSEN&WECK, P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3300 Edinborough Way, Suite No. 600 linneapolis (Edina), MN 55435 -5962 (612) 835 -7000 • FAX: (612) 835 -9450 GORDON V. JOHNSON MARSH J. HALBERG ROBERT D. LUCAS JOHN K. BOUQUET WILLIAM E. SJOHOLM DAVID J. M°GEE MARK G. OHNSTAD THOMAS R. KELLEY DENNIS M. PATRICK DONALD D. SMITH JOHN E. RODE GRETCHEN S. SCHELLHAS July 12, 2000 �f Mr. John Keprios Director of Parks and Recreation City of Edina 4801 West 5001 Street Edina, MN 55424 Mr. John Vallerie Braemar Golf Course 6364 John Harris Drive Edina, MN 55439 RE: 36"' Annual Braemar Inspection Dear John and John: OF COUNSEL: JACK W. CARLSON HELGE THOMSEN, Retired GLENN G. NYBECK, Retired JAMES VAN VALKENBURG, Retired f� ., v One only has to look around town to see how many activities take place under the jurisdiction of the Parks and Recreation Department. The number is somewhat mind - boggling, to say the least! I am pleased that one of those activities is the Annual Braemar Inspection. While the golfing is enjoyable, if not always good, the opportunity to see the various city employees and commission members in a nonwork setting is very important — everyone gets to know each other a little better. Both the city and the individuals involved benefit from this interaction. I'd like to thank both of you for your respective roles in the Annual Inspection. You take a lot of static (always good- natured, of course), but you do sponsor a class event — even if Kenny Rosland does think the prizes are "a little thin ". Thanks for your efforts and keep up the good work! I have appreciated being a part of this group for many years. Sinc ly, Gordon . J hnson GVJ:s MEMORANDUM DATE: July 18, 2000 TO: Mayor and Council FROM: Gordon L. Hughes City Manager SUBJECT: ISSUES REGARDING THE DAN PATCH COMMUTER RAIL PROJECT Laurie McNamara of the Commuter Rail Policy Committee has asked that this information be provided to you. Issues regarding the Dan Patch Commuter Rail Project The Association of Neighborhoods from Saint Louis Park, Edina and Bloomington believe the following ssues are significant and within the scope of this project. Citizen expectations of Feasibility Study include: -All sources of data will be available for review - Existing city comprehensive plans will be followed -All conclusions regarding.the impact of changes in the Dan Patch Line include increased . - freight traffic ISSUES 1. Considering the speed and volume of traffic, what is a safe distance from our homes to the tracks? At what distance would our homes be condemned? How many homes would be condemned? How many residences are adjacent to the rail line right -of -way? What structural damage could or would occur due to the vibration of the high speed trains? 2. EMERGENCY RESPONSE TIME of ambulances, police and fire trucks would be impaired as the many trains are crossing. How will impairment of EMERGENCY RESPONSE TIME be prevented? What will this cost? 3. How will safety be maintained for the hundreds of school buses continually crossing railroad tracks during peak times for the 12 commuter trains, plus the many freight trains per day? What will this cost? . 4. How will safety be ensured for the neighborhoods within many suburbs who are "locked in with no way out except over the railroad tracks? What about emergency and fire rescues for them it is estimated that 61 neighborhoods would be closed off. What will this cost? 5. High -speed trains will be traveling adjacent to many parks, schools and church yards. How will. safety be maintained?. What will this cost? 6. Noise would far exceed safety levels for. noise. What criteria is used to erect sound barriers? 7. NSP power lines are adjacent to the tracks,would utilities need to be moved to accommodate commuter rail lines? What will this cost? 8. The commuter rail would provide easy access and exit to and from the suburbs, how would safety be maintained? . What will this cost? 9. Increased freight traffic would cause increased chance of chemical and other hazardous or toxic spills from the freight trains This could contaminate ground water and endanger houses, parks and schools. What safeguards need to be implemented to prevent this ?. What will this cost? 10. Hazardous dust released from treated lumber during construction and soil contamination can occur when additional track is installed. What measures would be used to prevent this? What will this cost? 11. Increased freight traffic results in increased chance of freight train derailments. (Research indicates that there are over 10,000 derailments per year in the USA.) What preventative measures would be implemented? What will this cost? 12. Exposure to diesel fuel and its byproducts results in significant health risks to humans. These risks include: -short term exposure at certain levels can cause significant irritation to the eyes, nose, throat, mucous membranes - exposure at somewhat higher levels can cause drowsiness, lightheadedness, confusion, vision disturbances - significant exposure to specific by- products may cause profuse sweating, nausea, dermatitis, toxic damage to the blood, liver, bone- marrow and eventual renal damage / shut -down - significant exposure to specific by- products may cause cardiac arrhythmia / cardiac arrest Why use a 1940's technology that is obsolete and use diesel fuel which is a known harmful pollutant & contaminant? Do you have policies and procedures in place to deal with the results of these significant exposures should some type of rail line incident occur causing these levels of toxic exposures? What will this cost? 13. Its one thing for children to be attracted to the railroad tracks and play on them when there are only 3 trains per day traveling 30 miles/hour. It's quite another situation when there are over 20 trains a day travelin, at fairly high speeds. What safeguards will be implemented? What will this cost? 14. The commuter rail station would increase traffic congestion and could impact safety of residents around station. How will these issues be addressed? What will this cost? 15. Thousands of fires are started each year from trains across the country. A fire in Hyland Park this March was caused by a freight train on the Dan Patch line.? What policies and procedures will be put in place to prevent and handle these fire emergencies? What will this cost? 16. Are the current bridges designed to accommodate commuter rail and the increased level of trains per day? If not, what would be done and what are the cost involved to bring these bridges into alignment for safety odes, etc.? 17. What bridges over the Minnesota River are designed to accommodate Light Rail or Commuter Rail? 18. What is the typical cost overrun on projects such as these? 19. How can you say that these are independent studies (feasibility and environmental) when the same company who conducts the feasibility study for Phase II would perform the Phase III study if the Phase II findings indicate the project is feasible to that point? More important, how can you say that these are independent studies when the same company conducting these feasibility studies is also part of the construction company who may be hired to help build the commuter rail line? 20. How has the commuter rail affected the property values in the eight cities in which there is commuter service? 21. What distance from the track were property values affected in cities with commuter rail (1 block - 4 blocks )? 22. Are policies and procedures and monies in place to deal with the lawsuits that might occur at some time in the future because some of the concerns and questions become the community's and citizen's reality sometime in the future? 24. If the Dan Patch Commuter Rail is implemented, will costs be built in to reimburse residents with devalued property? 25. How will the negative impact on neighborhoods created by any use of this rail line be mediated? 26. How will this commuter rail system serve the fastest growing job center in the metro area? 27. What compact development / "smart growth" policies have been adopted by impacted cities that would suggest that fixed rail transportation system would be warranted? 28. Does Parsons Brinckerhoff have any commuter rail studies in which the conclusion was not to build the rail line? What criteria resulted in a decision of not feasible? 29. What are the benefits of the commuter rail to the local citizens in communities adjacent to the rail line ?Are their more efficient, effective ways to achieve these benefits? 30. Who will use this commuter rail line from our community? Will it only service people from a long distance'rather than local residents? July 10, 2000 r L ,1L City of Edina July 6, 2000 Dr. George W. Lund 6409 Indian Hills Road Edina, MN 55439 Dear Dr. Lund: Thank you for your letter of June 21, 2000, concerning the City property which adjoins your residence. By copy of this letter, I am asking our Park Department to investigate your concern and take appropriate action. I agree with your observation that the City should maintain its property in a manner similar to maintenance standards of residents in the area. Unfortunately, many residents seem to clean up their property by piling their debris on the City's property. Perhaps you can help us by informing others in your neighborhood that the City property is not the neighborhood dumping ground. Thank you again for your letter. Sincerely, Gordon L. qHugghe City Manager GLH /dw cc: Mayor and Council City Hall (952) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (952) 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394. TDD (952) 826 -0379 4. Z -2 r-- & City Manager; city of Edina. _ Dear Sir, The city property just no. of ours has a large dead cottonwood which could easily fall on the power lines with a SW wind where most of "the weather" comes from. The lot has a number of dead trees. Some on the ground. It also has a lot of 4 feet high weeds along the road. There is a large pile of brush on the lot. A lot of it is city trees and branches I piled on it. The rest is mine. I'd appreciate it if the lot could be cleaned up. It reflects on our property value. I have hired a man to pull out the mustard - garlic weeds on my property and the city. This is a weed that strangles other vegetation and iss a threat to forest land as the -foil is to the lakes. People in Indian Hills have begun cleaning ;up their wood lots and that is different than the past .So expectations of city property should fall in line. Sincerely, George W.Lund M.D. 6409 Indian Hills Rd. Edina, 55439 cc. Mr. Robert Perkins and the mayor. 41 , �_ () F . k City of Edina July 6, 2000 Kevin Roche 6800 Dakota Trail Edina, MN 55439 Dear Mr. Roche: I am taking the liberty of responding to your letter of June 20, 2000, to the City Council and City Attorney. Your letter reports that overgrown vegetation contributes to the potential for traffic accidents in the Indian Hills area. I am sure you will agree that most residents of Indian Hills value the heavily wooded character of the area. It is sometimes difficult for us to maintain a balance between these wishes on one hand and traffic safety consideration on the other. By copy of this letter, I am asking Vince Bongaarts, our Traffic Safety Coordinator to review the locations which you have noted and take appropriate action. Thank you again for your concern. Sincerely, Gordon L. Hughes City Manager GLH /dw cc: Mayor and Council City Hall (952) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (952) 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (952) 826 -0379 ---7,- 4C - -- .._. . a rvc Ld c-caC OtQV�,Q -.� .. /l 4/I ii/ I 1 �L •.LI.J% Y'!A Q/ 3 l.O CC. C� Gte. CCU- C -�-�IL � Al 0-44_., Gee r.2ta.4.,� � CC dv �e 8W� sn IRt u L�a e4— .(l2tC -Q-GC/ S- 2C -c.6< -tee Deb Mangen 'rom: Jennifer Wilkinson jent: Thursday, July 06, 200012:11 PM To: Deb Mangen; Gordon Hughes Subject: FW: Thanks! — Original Message From: Harold & Lila Larson [SMTP:hlarson @uswest.net] Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2000 9:09 AM To: Edina City Hall Subject: Thanks! Dear Council Members, I was so proud of each of you as you completed a difficult task last evening the 5th of July. I've lived in Edina most years since I was 16 and often have felt embarrassed to reveal my city. Not last night - Sincerely, Lila Larson 4800 School Road IV , i Gn' %Z-) U r. lb H wo 1 sS �2y A City of Edina July 11, 2000 J. Rinsema 4401 Valley View Road #2 Edina MN 55424 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Rinsema: Thank you for your letter of July 7, 2000, with respect to Roster's Service Station. I appreciate that you have taken the time to share your thoughts with me. I am taking the liberty of forwarding your letter to the Members of the City Council for their consideration. Thanks again. City Manager GLH /dw City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 (952) 927 -8861 FAX (952) 826 -0390 TDD (952) 826 -0379 KEITH WATERS & ASSOCIATES, Inc. DESIGNERS & BUILDERS 6216 Baker Road Suite 110 Eden Prairie, MN 55346 (952) 974 -0004 fax (952) 974 -0005 www.keithwaters.com License Number - 0001508 July 10, 2000 Mr. Fran Hoffman Director of Engineering City of Edina 4801 W. 501h St. Edina, MN 55424 Dear Fran, Thanks for helping resolve the "mystery" assessments so rapidly. Good work. Our closing today went well. Please thank all the inspection staff for us. The City of Edina, as always, was pretty classy to deal with. Keith Waters KW /hks c.c. Betsy Cutcliffe — \ASN-A -P-SEdZ- V -EsRI SHARE \P. FRS .ONALXKE1T.H\HOFF.MAN.7_- 1"QDOC -- - --- ----- --- ...._._ /A i SAFE STREETS, SAFE KIDS T1700- -PPALE S4`iJWd ' 3 FOR A SPO �\, IBL E 33 4`34'PI- ;� i!�f'Y�R BrdpS t�- t�it9iS -4317 B tb- CA�r9�i -4 June 21, 2000 Mr. Fran Hoffman Director of Public Works City of Edina City Hall Edina, MN Dear Mr. Hoffman: We are writing to respectfully request your immediate assistance to a matter that is of the highest concern to the dozens of families who reside in the 4500 and 4600 blocks of Wooddale Avenue. We request that the City of Edina take the necessary steps to reduce the amount and the speed of traffic on our street. Nearly all of us are parents of small children ranging in age from 1 year to 13 years old. In these two blocks of Wooddale, a total of 63 children ages 13 and under live and play. The amount and speed of traffic that travels on Wooddale poses a significant risk of serious or fatal injury to our children. While everyone of us has been very diligent about teaching our children about the dangers of crossing and playing in the street, there is no arguing that a simple mistake by anyone of our children, even the most responsible and oldest child, could end in tragedy. It is unacceptable to us to expose children to such a significant level of risk. At the present time, there are two problems that need to be addressed. Short term. The short-term problem involves the increased traffic and speed produced by the construction work on Route 100 and at the corner of 50th and France. We recognize that the disruption caused by construction is the price of progress, and we are willing to do our part. However, the increased traffic and especially the speed of vehicles traveling on Wooddale this summer is dangerous. With the amount of home renovations underway for the summer, the street is largely down to one lane; looking at it purely from an engineering perspective, we find it hard to believe that the street in its current condition has the capacity to safely handle the current amount of traffic. More important, the risk to our children, already unacceptably high, is worsened. Air, R= a 18, 20M 2 We request the City of Edina to develop a solution to this short-term problem. At a minimum, we suggest and request increased patrols and ticketing as a deterrent. But we also request the city to consider possible engineering or signage solutions as well. Longterm. Of equal or even greater importance to us is getting an effective solution to the longer -term traffic problem we experience on Wooddale. As you know, this neighborhood and the City have wrestled with the traffic problem on Wooddale for years. The addition of stop signs and islands by the city made measurable improvements early. on. We all appreciate the City's efforts. But the amount of traffic continues to increase and the number of children residing on Wooddale has exploded. We are united in our belief that much more needs to be done to reduce both the speed and the amount of traffic on Wooddale. An independent traffic engineer we consulted acknowledged that the number of vehicles traveling on Wooddale is troublesome. Therefore, we respectfully request your personal leadership and assistance in developing and implementing a solution to Wooddale's long -term traffic problem. There is no doubt in our minds that fewer cars moving at slower speeds is essential to reducing the serious risk now faced by our children. We would appreciate it if you would attend and discuss possible short term and long terms solutions at a meeting of Wooddale parents. Kevin Bruns (926- 0317) and Becky Briggs (927 -4520) will call in the next several days to arrange a time and date for a meeting. Sincerely, Wooddale Parents —�� ���ua, j4 try cy t i WIRM"aftm Amy 18,2M lb ruw ysaza�/mn/at,4�,�;�c.�. cji way- AI-.4 �sz3 Oc, z DOP't L SEAL JUN 2 0 G 2000 RECEIVED BY ovu� ysaza�/mn/at,4�,�;�c.�. cji way- AI-.4 �sz3 Oc, z DOP't L SEAL JUN 2 0 G 2000 RECEIVED BY Edina, Minnesota Wellhead Protection Plan City of Edina, Minnesota SEH No. A- EDINA9801.00 January, 2000 REMOvE 1)0 NAT RD M �pV AMBERS CN )j4 SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC Multidisciplined. Single Source. Edina, Minnesota Wellhead Protection Plan City of Edina, Minnesota SEH No. A- EDINA9801.00 January, 2000 Allen H. Sunderman, P.G. Project Manager Craig L. z, P.G. Hydrogeologist Note: This document has been printed on recycled paper. Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. 3535 Vadnais Center Drive 200 SEH Center St. Paul, Minnesota 55110 (651) 490 -2000 i 4e Certification Page Table of Contents Table of Contents Page 1.0 Introduction ................. ............................... 1 1.1 Purpose and Scope ...... ............................... 1 1.2 Background ............ ............................... 1 i 2.0 Physical Environment ......... ............................... 3 2.1 Precipitation ..... ............................... 3 2.2 Geology ................ ............................... 4 2.3 Soils ................... ............................... 5 2.4 Surface Water Resources .. ............................... 6 2.4.1 Public Surface Waters ............................... 6 2.4.2 Wetlands .......... ............................... 7 2.4.3 Floodplains ........ ............................... 7 2.5 Land Uses 7 2.5.1 Community Setting ... ............................... 7 2.5.2 Historical Land Uses ................................ 8 2.5.2.1 Well 2 DWSMA .............................. 8 2.5.2.2 Well 3 DWSMA .............................. 8 2.5.3 Current Land Uses ... ............................... 9 2.5.3.1 Residential Land Use ........................ 10 2.5.3.2 Commercia L Land Use ........................ 10 2.5.3.3 Office Land Use ............................ 10 2.5.3.4 Industrial ... ............................... 10 2.5.3.5 Mixed Use 11 2.5.3.6 Public Lands ............................... 11 2.5.3.7 Quasi - Public Lands .......................... 11 2.5.3.8 Land Use Within Vulnerable DWSMAS ........... 11 r 2.5.4 Water Use 11 2.6 Well Survey ............. ............................... 12 2.7 Water Quantity .......... ............................... 13 2.7.1 Surface Water Quantity ............................. 13 2.7.2 Water Use Conflicts . ............................... 14 2.7.3 Water Appropriation . 14 2.8 Water Quality ........... ............................... 14 2.8.1 Surface Water Quality .............................. 14 2..8.2 Groundwater Quality ............................... 14 i Wellhead Protection A- EDINA9801.00 Edina Page i ti 3.0 Wellhead Protection Area Delineations ......................... 15 4.0 Drinking Water Supply Management Area Delineations ............ 15 5.0 Vulnerability Assessments .... ............................... 15 6.0 Potential Contaminant Source Inventory ........................ 16 6.1 Superfund Sites and Hazardous Waste Sites ................. 16 6.2 Solid Waste Sites ........ ............................... 16 6.3 Voluntary Investigation and Cleanup Sites .................... 17 6.4 Leaking Underground Storage Tank Sites .................... 17 6.5 Spills .................. ............................... 17 6.6 Hazardous Waste Violators 6.7 ............................... Underground Storage Tank Sites 18 6.8 ........................... Aboveground Storage Tank Site 18 6.9 ............................ Large Quantity Hazardous Waste Generators .................. 18 19 6.10 Small Quantity Hazardous Waste Generators ................. 19 6.11 Hazardous Waste Transporters ............................ 19 6.12 Golf Courses ........... ............................... 19 ' 7.0 Impact of Changes to Public Water Supply Wells ................. 20 f 7.1 Changes In The Next 10 Years ............................ 20 7.2 Impacts of Changes .... ............................... 20 8.0 Issues, Problems and Opportunities .......................... 21 9.0 Wellhead Protection ......... ............................... 22 9.1 Goal 1 - Public Education Program ......................... 22 9. 1.1 Objective ..... ............................... .. 22 9.1.2 Plan of Action ...... ............................... 23 9.2 Goal 2 - Private Well Abandonment Program ................. 23 9.2.1 Objective ......... ............................... 23 9.2.2 Plan of Action ...... ............................... 23 9.3 Goal 3 - Potential Contaminant Source Database .............. 24 9.3.1 Objective ......... ............................... 24 9.3.2 Plan of Action ... ............................... . 24 9.4 Goal 4 - Future Land Redevelopment Zoning Plan 24 9.4.1 Objective ......... ............................... 24 9.4.2 Plan of Action ...... ............................... 24 9.5 Goal 5 - Wellhead Protection Plan Implementation ............. 25 ® 9.5.1 Objective ......... ............................... 25 9.5.2 Plan of Action ...... ............................... 25 9.6 Goal 6 - Groundwater Quality Monitoring ..................... 25 9.6.1 Objective ......... ............................... 25 9.6.2 Plan of Action ...... ............................... 26 9.7 Goal 7 - Reduction in Public Water Supply demand ............ 26 1 Wellhead Protection A- EDINA9801.00 Edina Page ii 9.7.1 Objective ......... ............................... 26 9.7.2 Plan of Action ...... ............................... 26 9.8 Goal 8 - Response Plan ... ............................... 27 9.8.1 Objective ......... ............................... 27 9.8.2 Plan of Action ...... ............................... 27 10.0 Evaluation Program .......... ............................... 27 11.0 Alternate Water Supply and Continency Strategy ................. 28 11.1 Alternative Sources For Water Supply ....................... 11.2 Water Use Reduction and Allocation Procedures .............. 28 29 11.3 Water Supply Shortage Plan .............................. 29 11.3.1 Annual Conservation Efforts ................... 11.3.2 Water Emergency Conditions .................. 29 30 11.3.2.1 Administrative Actions ..................... 11.3.2.2 Emer ency Plan 30 .......................... 30 11.3.2.3 Utilities Operation Proq� 30 ................. 11.3.3 Water Supply Allocation Procedure .............. k 31 References...................... ............................... 3 32 i wenneaa rrotection A- EDINA980TO0 Edina Page iii List of Figures Figure 1 City Location Map Figure 2A Topographic Map - North Half of Edina Figure 213 Topographic Map - South Half of Edina Figure 3 City Map and Municipal Well Locations Figure 4 Surficial Geology Map Figure 5 Bedrock Geology Map Figure 6 Geologic Susceptibility of Prairie du Chien - Jordan Aquifer Figure 7 Floodplain Map for Well 11 DWSMA Figure 8 Floodplain Map for Well 18 DWSMA Figure 9 Land Use Map Figure 10 WHPAs - Prairie du Chien - Jordan Aquifer E Figure 11 F► WHPAs - Mount Simon - Hinckley Aquifer Figure 12 DWSMAs for Wells Aquifer Screened in the Prairie du Chien - Jordan Figure 13 DWSMAs for Wells Aquifer Screened in the Mount Simon - Hinckley Wellhead Protection A- EDINA9801. 00 Edina Page iv i ;s i Figure 14 Vulnerable DWSMAs for Wells 11 and 18 Figure 15 Hazardous Waste Sites Figure 16 Solid Waste Sites Figure 17 Voluntary Investigation and Cleanup Sites Figure 18 Leaking Underground Storage Tank Sites Figure 19 Spill Sites Figure 20 Hazardous Waste Violators Figure 21 Aboveground and Underground Storage Tank Sites Figure 22 Small and Large Quantity Hazardous Waste Generators and Hazardous Waste Transporter Sites Figure 23 Golf Courses Wellhead Protection A- EDINA9801T Edina Page v j i 1 z List of Tables Page Table 1 Well Characteristics .............. ............................... 2 Table 2 Precipitation Data - Mpls /StP International Airport ...................... 3 Table 3 Existing Land Use Data ............ ............................... 9 Table 4 Water Use (mgy) by Land Use Category: 1989 - 1,998 .................. 12 Table 5 Well Survey Results ............. ............................... 13 Table 6 Groundwater Appropriation Permits . ............................... 14 Table 7 Projected Water Supply Demand . ............................... 20 Wellhead Protection A- EDINA9801.00 Edina Page vi a i� List of Appendices Appendix A Wellhead Protection Area Delineations and Vulnerability Assessments Report, November 1998 Appendix B Nine Mile Creek Watershed District 1998 Engineers Annual Report Appendix C Well Logs of Municipal Wells (from MGS CWI database) Appendix D Zoning Map Appendix E 1999 Edina Water Quality Report Appendix F PCS Data Appendix G WPP Contamination Response'Plan b �I i Wellhead Protection A- EDINA9801.00 Edina Page vii January, 2000 Wellhead Protection Plan City of Edina, Minnesota 1.0 Introduction w The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) finalized the state Wellhead Protection Program and promulgated the rules in November 1997. The Wellhead Protection rules are based on the legal mandates of the federal Safe Drinking Water Act and the 1989 Minnesota Groundwater ' Protection Act. Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. (SEH) was retained by the City of Edina, Minnesota (City)(Public Water Supplier Identification Number 1270011) to complete their Wellhead Protection Plan (WPP). This report summarizes the Edina WPP, and meets the requirements of Minnesota Rules Chapter 4720, in accordance with Chapter 4720.5200. 1.1 Purpose and Scope The purpose of Wellhead Protection is to prevent contaminants, that could affect public health, from entering public water supply. This report is a compilation of Edina's WPP. The report outlines the physical environment of the City, summarizes the Wellhead Protection Area (WHPA) delineations, Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA) delineations, and the vulnerability assessments, analyzes a potential contaminant inventory, examines the City's water supply future changes, issues, problems and opportunities, and addresses the goals, objectives, and plan of action for Wellhead Protection. In addition, a WPP evaluation program is identified, and the City's alternate water supply and continency strategies are reviewed. 1.2 Background The City of Edina is a suburb located in the Twin Cities, southwest of Minneapolis, Minnesota as shown in Figure 1. Figure 2 is a topographic map of the City. In 1994, the City began the process of developing a WPP before the Wellhead Protection Rules were promulgated. Although Edina has not formally been ranked by the MDH, the City wanted to be proactive in Wellhead Protection. The City retained SEH in 1994 to delineate the WHPAs and DWSMAs, and complete the vulnerability assessments. The City currently has eighteen (18) public water supply wells. Fifteen (15) of the wells are screened in the Prairie du Chien - Jordan bedrock Wellhead Protection A- EDINA9801.00 City of Edina, Minnesota Page 1 aquifer. The other three wells are screened in the Mount Simon - Hinckley bedrock aquifer (Wells 9, 10 and 12). Table 1 lists the MDH unique well numbers and the characteristics of all 18 wells. The locations of the wells are depicted in Figure 3. Due to a tritium level of 1.5 T.U. recorded in Well 14, all City wells screened in the Prairie du Chien - Jordan aquifer are classified as vulnerable. Table 1 Well Characteristics A- EDINA9801.00 Wellhead Protection Page 2 City of Edina, Minnesota Ca sin Well Year Construction Aquifer Total Static Levey Diam. Depth .Pump Unique No. (Renovated) Formation(s) .Depth (ft.) Range (in.) (ft.) Capacity Well (GPM) No. 2 1935 Prairie du 1999 Chien - Jordan 460 68 -87 16 260 1000 208399 3 1946 Prairie du 422 1992 Chien - Jordan 57 -81 12 265 900 240630 4 1950 Prairie 1988 Chien-Jordan 500 82 16 265 650 200561 5 1950 Prairie 1991 Chien-Jordan 443 70 -81 16 257 900 206377 6 1954 Prairie 1998 Chien-Jordan 505 90 -114 16 315 1100 200564 7 1955 Prairie 1983 Chien-Jordan 547 112 -146 16 350 650 206474 8 1953 Prairie du 1990 Chien - Jordan 472 49 -76 16 230 550 204884 9 1957 Simon -. 1994 Hi Hinckley 1130 215 -396 10 1010 .. 500 206588 10 1963 1999 Simon- Hinckley Hi 1001 150 -252 16 882 600 206184 11 1963 1998 Prairie du Chien - Jordan 402 22 16 321 1000 206183 12 1964 1997 Mt: Simon- Hinckley 1081 252 -397 16 955 900 203614 13 1964 1989 Prairie du Chien- Jordan 496 96 -134 16 429 900 203613 14 1964 1992 Prairie du Chien - Jordan 418 38 -52 16 325 800 200913 15 1967 1989 Prairie du Chien - Jordan 405 83 -100, 20 276 1000 207674 16 1967 Prairie du 1998 Chien - Jordan 382 70 -87 24 260 1100 203101 17 1970, Prairie 1991) Chien-Jordan 461 57 -68 24 373 950 200914 18 1973 1977 Prairie Chien-Jordan 446 61 -65 16 365 800 200918 19 1988 Prairie Chien-Jordan 524 152 16 440 1000 505626 A- EDINA9801.00 Wellhead Protection Page 2 City of Edina, Minnesota In November 1998, the City submitted the WHPA and DWSMA delineations, and the vulnerability assessments for the WPP to the MDH for review and approval. A copy of this report is provided in Appendix A. Based on the geologic susceptibility information and data gathered for the vulnerability assessments, only the DWSMAs for Wells 11 and 18 were classified `vulnerable ". The WPP second scoping meeting was held on March 24, 1999, in accordance with Minnesota Rules Chapter 4720.5340. A public meeting to discuss the WHPA and DWSMA delineations and the vulnerability assessments was held on May 4, 1999. The City received a letter from the MDH on May 20, 1999 approving the WHPAs, DWSMAs, and vulnerability assessments for all 18 wells. 2.0 Physical Environment f In accordance with the May 20, 1999 letter from the MDH and Minnesota Rules Chapter 4720.5400, the following information on the physical environment of the City is provided in the following sections. 2.1 Precipitation According to the 1974 Hennepin County Soil Survey, the annual average precipitation in the county is 29.4 inches. One year in ten will have less than 21.2 inches or more than 29.1 inches of precipitation. Based on the Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport data, retrieved from the U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration - National Climatic Data Center, the average annual precipitation between 1992 and 1997 was 29.62 inches. The annual precipitation data is summarized in Table 2 Table 2 Precipitation Data - Mpls/StP International Airport Year Precipitation inches 1997 34.43 1996 26.05 1995 25.66 1994 29.67 1993 32.21 1992 29.67 Precipitation data was also available in Appendix C of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District, 1998 Engineers Annual Report. A copy of this report is included in Appendix B of this WPP. Since 1965, the average precipitation in the Nine Mile Creek Watershed is 27.1 inches. Wellhead Protection A- EDINA9801.00 City of Edina, Minnesota Page 3 2.2 Geology The surficial and bedrock geology of the City was discussed in detail in the Wellhead Protection Area Delineations and Vulnerability Assessments report dated November 1998 (see Appendix A). Figure 4 depicts the surficial geology of the City. The uppermost bedrock formations underlying the City are shown in Figure 5. The geologic susceptibility of the Prairie du Chien - Jordan aquifer to surficial contamination in Edina is depicted in Figure 6. All three figures were generated from the 1989 Minnesota Geological Survey (MGS) Geologic Atlas of Hennepin County, Minnesota. The City has limited records of well logs, boring logs, exploration test holes, and excavations. Well records and geologic logs for the 18 municipal wells were obtained from the MGS County Well Index(CWI). database. Copies of the well records and geologic logs are included in Appendix C. Based on these records it appears that the geologic materials penetrated by the wells include Quaternary glacial deposits (tills and outwash deposits generally consisting, of clays, sands and gravel), the Ordovician Platteville Limestone, Glenwood Shale, and St. Peter Sandstone (only in some areas of Edina), the Ordovician Prairie du Chein Group (a dolostone), and the Cambrian Jordan Sandstone. In addition, the deeper wells have encountered and/or penetrated the confining Cambrian St. Lawrence Formation (a dolomitic siltstone and shale confining unit), the Franconia Formation (a glauconitic sandstone), the Ironton and Galesville Sandstones, the Eau Claire Formation (a siltstone and shale confining unit), the Mount Simon Sandstone, and either the Precambrian Hinckley Sandstone or Solar Church Formation (a reddish brown shale with interbedded sandstone). The three wells screened in the Mount Simon - Hinckley aquifer (Wells 9, 10 and 12) are classified as-non-vulnerable since both the St. Lawrence and Eau Claire Formations confining layers are present. Where present, the Decorah Shale (geologically younger than the Platteville Limestone) is a confining layer for the Prairie du Chien - Jordan aquifer. Since it is quite thin, the Glenwood Shale is not considered a confining layer. However, the Decorah Shale is not present in Edina, and in areas where the Quaternary glacial deposits are thin, and the Platteville Formation, Glenwood Shale and St. Peter Sandstone are missing, the Prairie du Chien - Jordan aquifer is relatively vulnerable, as in the case of Wells 11 and 18. The DWSMAs for these two wells are classified as vulnerable based on the High- Medium susceptibility rating listed on the Sensitivity of Groundwater Systems To Pollution map of the 1989 Geologic Atlas of Hennepin County MGS publication (Plate 7 of 9). The thickness and nature of the Quaternary glacial deposits, and/or the presence of the Platteville Formation, Glenwood Shale, and/or St. Peter Sandstone protect the susceptibility and vulnerability of the other Edina A- EDINA9801.00 Wellhead Protection Page 4 City of Edina, Minnesota municipal wells screened in the Prairie du Chien - Jordan aquifer. ' Therefore, the DWSMAs for Wells 11 and 18 will be more carefully managed by the City. The local geology will allow the Edina to manage the other DWSMAs less stringently. i The City does not have geophysical records from wells, borings or exploration test holes conducted within Edina. In addition, other than the Sensitivity of Groundwater Systems To Pollution map of the 1989 Geologic Atlas of Hennepin County MGS publication (Plate 7 of 9), no other surface geophysical studies are known to have been conducted for i the City. 2.3 Soils The soils present in the City were not classified in the 1974 Hennepin County Soil Survey. Based on the Surficial Geology map of the 1989 Geologic Atlas of Hennepin County MGS publication (Plate 3 of 9), eight different types of glacial deposits exist within the boundaries of Edina. The eight types of Quaternary deposits include three postglacial deposits - organic deposits, filled and drained organic deposits, and sandy floodplain alluvium. The organic deposits consist of peat and organic -rich sediment, and the floodplain alluvium consist of sand and gravel interbedded and overlain by finer sediment and organic matter. Four of the other five Quaternary deposits are from the Des Moines Glacier Lobe and the Grantsburg Glacier Sublobe. Generally, outwash deposits are located in the northeastern comer, along the eastern boundary, and in the southeastern comer of the City. These deposits consist of sand, loamy sand and gravel. The other three deposits include a loamy till, a sandy till, and till of mixed composition. A small area in the northwestern comer of the City has ice- contact stratified deposits from the Superior Glacier Lobe. The areas in which outwash deposits of the Des Moines Lobe and Grantsburg Sublobe are present, are more susceptible to allowing vertical infiltration of precipitation, and potentially contaminants, into the underlying aquifers. Based on the geologic susceptibility information and data gathered for the vulnerability assessments, the DWSMAs for Wells 11 and 18 were classified as vulnerable. (Please refer to the report provided in Appendix A.) The vulnerable DWSMAs of Wells 11 and 18 are located within these outwash deposit areas. Therefore, the City will manage these two DWSMAs more carefully than the others. The soils and Quaternary deposits will not impact the management of the other DWSMAs. In addition, eroding lands will not impact the management of any of the DWSMAs. Wellhead Protection A- EDINA9801.00 City of Edina, Minnesota Page 5 2.4 Surface Water Resources The primary natural features influencing land use development patterns in the City are its two creeks and five lakes. Approximately two - thirds of the City is within the Nine Mile Creek Watershed. Both the North Fork and the South Fork of the Nine Mile Creek pass through the City. The northeastern third of the City drains to Minnehaha Creek. In addition to the creeks, the five lakes provide attractive settings for residential development. The DWSMAs for Wells 11 and 18 are within the Nine Mile Creek Watershed. However, Nine Mile Creek itself is not within either DWSMA. The North Fork of the Nine Mile Creek is located 500 feet west of the DWSMA for Well 11. In May 1996, the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District published a 509 Plan in accordance with the Metropolitan Surface Water Management Act and Watershed Law: Minnesota. Statutes Chapters 103B and 103D. Based on information published in this document surface waters in the DWSMAs for Wells 11 and 18 flow toward the southwest and drain into the North Fork of the Nine Mile Creek. The Nine Mile Creek Watershed, its boundaries and flow direction, will not impact the management of the DWSMAs for Wells 11 and 18. In addition, the watershed will not impact the management of the DWSMAs for the other municipal, wells. 2.4.1 Public Surface Waters Public drainage ditches do not exist within the DWSMAs for Wells 11 and 18. Only one public water exists within these two DWSMAs. Lake Edina (Protected Water 27 -0029) is located in the. western portion of the DWSMA for Well 11. According to Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) data, there are no shoreland classifications listed for Lake Edina. The 10 -, 50 -, 100 - and 500 -year lake elevations are 823.40, 824.00, 824.50, 824.60 feet above mean sea level (M.S.L.) respectively. The highest recorded elevation for Lake Edina was 825.39 feet M.S.L. on July 24, 1987. Additional lake level data is available in Appendix B of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District, 1998 Engineer's Annual Report. A copy of the report is included in Appendix B of this WPP. Based on the 1998 report, Lake Edina decreased 1.1 feet between January 1998 and January 1999. Lake Edina will not impact the management of the DWSMAs for Wells 11 and 18. Public waters and drainage ditches will not impact the management of the remaining DWSMAs. The City does not currently have a Shoreland. Ordinance. However, in 1992 the City adopted the DNR setback distances. h- Cu11vAat$U1.uu Wellhead Protection Page 6 City of Edina, Minnesota 2.4.2 Wetlands No regulated wetlands exist within the DWSMAs for Wells 11 and 18. Wetlands will not impact the management of the remaining DWSMAs. 2.4.3 Floodplains According to Panel 6 of 6 of the Flood Insurance Rate Map of the City of Edina, published by the National Flood Insurance Program, the western portion of the vulnerable DWSMA for Well 11 is zoned as high risk to flooding (Zone A) in the vicinity of Lake Edina. Zone A areas are at or below the 100 -year flood elevations. In addition, there are areas surrounding Lake Edina and in the southern half of the DWSMA for Well 11 that are classified as medium risk to flooding (Zone B). The Zone B areas are between the 100 - and 500 -year flood elevations. There are also smaller areas in the northern, northeastern, central and southern portions of the Well 11 DWSMA that are classified as minimal flooding (Zone Q. Figure 7 is the floodplain map of the Well 11 DWSMA. Most of the DWSMA for Well 18 is classified as Zone C - minimal flooding potential. There are no Zone A or Zone B areas within the DWSMA. Figure 8 is the floodplain map of the Well 18 DWSMA. The areas of potential flooding within the DWSMAs for Wells 11 and 18 will not impact the management of the DWSMAs. In addition, flooding potential will not impact the management of the remaining DWSMAs. 2.5 Land Uses 2.5.1 Community Setting Edina is a fully- developed community in Hennepin County, located immediately west of Minneapolis. The City's 1998 population was 47,029. The number of persons employed in Edina is approximately 49,130. The City contains several regional facilities including the Southdale Shopping Center, Fairview Southdale Hospital, and two Hennepin County Libraries, in addition to four public and private golf courses. These facilities (excluding the libraries) have water supplied by privately owned wells. Edina contains a mixture of housing types, commercial nodes, office parks and light industrial areas. The City has historically emphasized the preservation of its significant natural features through its development regulations and state and federal mandate programs. As a result of these actions, as well as its proximity to the Minneapolis downtown area, the City experienced substantial growth after World War II and has continued to maintain a balanced mix of land uses. Single - family housing development served by small service- oriented commercial development occurred in the early 1920's. Regional retail development soon surrounded Southdale Shopping Center after its construction in 1952. Alternative housing types such as apartments, Wellhead Protection A- EDINA9801.00 City of Edina, Minnesota Page 7 townhouses, and condominiums, aimed at a variety of age and income levels, soon followed and are situated near retail and service areas in the community. Beginning in the 1960's, Edina proved to be attractive to major office and industrial developers. The Pentagon Office Park development around the Southdale Shopping Center, and office/service industries along the north side of Interstate Highway 494, all occurred following substantial residential and retail investment in the community. Future activity will be redevelopment projects since little vacant land remains. However, redevelopment activities are not anticipated to bring major changes to land use because of the constant private reinvestment into existing developments. 2.5.2 Historical Land Uses Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps from 1912, 1941 and 1952 were reviewed by SEH to identify historical land uses within the City. However, only the northeastern portion of Edina was developed at the time the maps were published. Therefore, a majority of Edina is not depicted on the maps. The area covered by the maps only include the DWSMAs for Wells 2 and 3. Information from the maps in the vicinity of the two DWSMAs are discussed below. u. According to the historical fire insurance maps, most of the DWSMA for Well 2 were residential homes. The Edina Public School was depicted in the northwestern comer of the intersection of West 50th Street and Woodale Avenue, and the Edina Country Club golf course was shown east of Woodale Avenue and south of West 50th Street. No commercial or industrial businesses were shown on the fire insurance maps in the DWSMA for Well 2. Like the DWSMA for Well 2, most of the land use in the DWSMA for Well 3 were residential. However, commercial land use is depicted on the fire insurance map in the southwestern quadrant of the West 50th Street and France Avenue intersection. Many of these businesses are located within the DWSMA for Well 3, but are not labeled. However, a movie theater, paint store, bowling alley and restaurant are specifically identified within the Well 3 DWSMA. In addition, two 'filling stations" are identified in the southeastern and southwestern quadrants of the West 50th Street and Halifax Avenue intersection, immediately west of the Well ] 3 DWSMA. Another filling station was identified in the northwestern 1 quadrant of the France Avenue and West 54th Street intersection, south of the Well 3 DWSMA. No gas stations are currently located in these areas. No filling stations were identified within the DWSMA for Well 3. A- EDINA9801.00 Wellhead Protection Page 8 City, of Edina, Minnesota 2.5.3 Current Land Uses Edina is a fully developed first -ring suburb of Minneapolis, located in the Twin Cities metropolitan area. The City is 16 square miles and is bound on the east by Minneapolis and Richfield, on the south by Bloomington, on the west by Eden Prairie, Minnetonka and Hopkins, and on the north by Hopkins and St. Louis Park. Less than one percent of the City remains open and undeveloped. All of the City is within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) line, meaning all areas of the City are served by public utilities and services. Edina developed as a residential suburb of Minneapolis. Today Edina remains primarily residential both in terms of land area and attitude. Most growth will occur in the workforce population. The residential population will only experience slight growth in the near future. The general pattern of land use within Edina has not significantly changed since the first City -wide plan was adopted in 1981. According to the March 1999 Land Use Plan included in the City of Edina Comprehensive Plan, the properties within Edina have been classified as a) Single Dwelling Residential, b) Low Density Attached Residential, c) Medium Density Residential, d) High Density Residential, e) Office, f) Commercial, g) Industrial, h) Mixed Use, i) Public, j) Quasi - public, and k) Water. A copy of the map is included as Figure 9. In addition, a detailed zoning map of the City, dated March 7, 1984 is included as Appendix D. This map is the most recent detailed zoning map of Edina. Four golf courses exist within the Edina City limits: Braemer Golf Course, Edina Country Club, Fred Richards Golf Course, and Interlachen Country Club. The DWSMA for Well 14 is within the Braemer Golf Course. Portions of the DWSMAs for Wells 2 and 4 are within the Edina Country Club. The Fred Richards Golf Course is within the DWSMA for Well 11, and the DWSMA for Well 15 intersects Interlachen Country Club. Residential use remains the dominant land use in the City. Land used for residential purposes is up slightly from 1980 figures. The following table summarizes the current land uses by general category. Table 3 Existing Land Use Data Land Use Acreage Percentage Residential 6806 66.4 Commercial 255 2.49 Office 174 1.69 Industrial 352 3.44 Mixed Use 105 1.02 Public 1800 17.57 Quasi - Public 706 6.89 Vacant 42 0.41 Wellhead Protection A- EDINA9801.00 City of Edina, Minnesota Page 9 2.5.3.1 Residential Land Use The dominant land use in Edina is residential. In 1998, residential land use comprised a total of 22,196 units. Single Dwelling Attached properties account for 12,675 units, with the remaining 8,861 units being multi - dwelling buildings. Recent growth in residential land use has occurred mainly in multi- dwelling developments. During the period between 1970 and 1998, the City added 1,700 single dwelling units. During the same period, 6,872 multi - dwelling units were added. In the future, it is projected that much of the residential land use growth will be multi - dwelling buildings. 2.5.3.2 Commercial Lend Use Edina defines commercial properties as lands used for retail sales and services. Retail uses are divided between the neighborhood, community, and regional level. The largest concentration of retail uses occur in the greater Southdale regional shopping area. This area includes approximately 180 of the 224 acres devoted to retail use. No significant increase in commercial land use is projected. In addition to Southdale, the City contains two community level commercial districts, and three neighborhood scale districts. The community level districts include 50th and France and Grandview Heights. Combined, the two districts are approximately 34 acres. Neither of the community level districts are projected to increase in size. 2.5.3.3 Office Land Use Office land use includes hospitals, medical offices and clinics, as well as general office space. Concentrations of office use occur in the France and York Avenue corridors south of Highway 62, near the France and Highway 494 interchange, the Highway 169 corridor, and the Edina Interchange area west of Highway 100. Smaller concentrations of office land use are located in the 50th and France, and Grandview Heights commercial areas. Additional office development is expected through in- fill and redevelopment of sites within the existing areas of office land use. 2.5.3.4 Industrial Industrial. land use includes warehousing, manufacturing, scientific research, and health and fitness centers. Office use is also permitted in industrial areas. Major concentrations of industrial land use include the Edina Interchange Center located west of Highway 100 and south of West 70th Street, and the greater Pentagon Park area located along 77th Street between Highway 100 and France Avenue. The City does not anticipate growth in industrial land use in the near future. A- EDINA9801.00 Wellhead Protection Page 10 City of Edina, Minnesota 2.5.3.5 Mixed Use Mixed use includes residential, office and commercial developments in close proximity to one another, without the typical separations required by the zoning ordinance. Mixed developments occupy large tracts of land subject to a master plan. There are two mixed use developments in Edina. In both cases, public park facilities provide a transition between uses otherwise considered incompatible. 2.5.3.6 Public Land, - Public land uses include city- owned, non -park properties, and county 8 libraries. This category includes properties used for general government, fire and public works facilities. 2.5.3.7 Quasi-Public Lands Quasi -public land uses include public and private schools, religious institutions, and private or semi- private golf courses and health club facilities. 6 2.5.3.8 Land Use Within V ilnemblp DWSMAs ' There are six different land uses in the DWSMA for Well 11. The land uses include single dwelling residential and public lands in the northern, western, and central portions of the DWSMA, low density attached residential and high density residential properties in the southeastern central portion of the DWSMA, and industrial and office space in the southern portion and southeastern corner of the DWSMA. Within the DWSMA for Well 18 there are seven different land uses. They include single dwelling residential and commercial properties in the southeastern corner of the DWSMA, high density residential in the southwestern, western and north - central portions of the DWSMA, public and quasi - public properties in the east - central and northeastern comer of the DWSMA, office space in the northeastern comer of the DWSMA, and mixed use in the northwestern comer of the DWSMA. 2.5.4 Water Use The City has maintained records of service connections since the inception of the water metering program in the early 1960's. The City contracts with LOGIS® for utility billing, and LOGIS manages the water utility database. The number of residential service connections have slightly increased since 1989 and represent an extremely modest rate of growth. Multi- family, commercial and industrial uses have also remained relatively consistent since 1989. A neighborhood in northeastern Edina ( "Morningside ") is served by the Minneapolis water supply system. Table 4 summarizes the water use in Edina by land use according to the LOGIS billing records. Wellhead Protection A- EDINA9801.00 City of Edina, Minnesota Page 11 Table 4 Water Use (mgy) by Land Use Category: 1989 - 1998 Category 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993* 1994 1995 1996* 1997 1998 Residential and 2181.4 2306.8 1966.4 2055.0 2395.1 2080.3 2348.3 4496.4 2885.8 2556.7 Multi - Family Commercial 570.5 526.4 829.5 665.6 783.3 663.3 920.5 806.5 737.6 719.8 and Industrial Total * T7___l._ - 2751.2_j 2833.2 1 2795.9 2720.6 3178.4 2743.6 3268.8 5302.9 3623.4 3276.5 data due to billing errors Currently, residential uses comprise approximately 77 percent of the total water consumption. In addition, the majority of the water use within the residential land use is single- family homes. Approximately two percent of the City's water is provided from the City of Minneapolis for the Morningside neighborhood and a few industrial businesses. Because of the manner in which water consumption data is collected and billed by LOGIS, it is difficult to ascertain unaccounted water use. The City engineering department estimates that unaccounted water use comprises about five percent of the total water pumped by the water supply system. Unaccounted, water use is that which is not metered, and includes firefighting water use, lawn sprinkling of public lands, hydrant flushing, street cleaning activities and sewer maintenance. 2.6 Well Survey Utilizing the MGS CWI for Hennepin County dated July 27, 1999, SEH conducted a well survey for the entire City. The CWI database was searched by Township, Range and Section. Specifically, Sections 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, and 33 of Township 117 N, Range 21 W, Sections 4, 5, 6, 7, 8,9 ' and 18 of Township 116 N, Range 21 W, and Sections 7, 18, 19, 20, 29, 30, 31, and 32 of Township 28 N, Range 24 W were searched for wells. . A total of 665 wells were identified in the database. Table 5 summarizes the number of wells per category. Of the- 19 listed municipal wells, only 18 are active. Well 1 has been, properly abandoned. The 15 public supply wells include schools, parks, golf courses, etc. and are defined as non - community public supply wells that supply water to at least 15 service connections used by individuals other than year round residents for at least 60 days per year, or serves 25 or more people at least 60 days per year. The public supply wells are not used for municipal supply. H- �uiivHaesui.uu Wellhead Protection Page 12 City of Edina, Minnesota n 0 Table 5 Well Survey Results Well Use Number of Wells Domestic 453 Monitoring 93 Commercial 28 Municipal 19* Public Supply 15 Irrigation 8 Abandoned 3 Industrial 2 Test 2 Recovery 1 Air Conditioning 1 Other' 11 Unknown 29 jalumum weu i wnica nas Deen ananaonea. The DWSMAs for Wells 11 and 18 are within Sections 31 and 32 of Township 28 North, Range 24 West, and the northern half of the NEi /a and NW 1/a of Section 6 in Township 27 North, Range 24 West. Within this area, 75 wells were identified via the MGS CWI database. Of these wells, forty (40) are for domestic use, twenty -two (22) are monitoring wells, three (3) are for industrial use, three (3) are municipal wells, three (3) are, public supply wells, one (1) is an irrigation well, one (1) is for commercial use, one (1) is abandoned, and the use of the last well is unknown. According to the City Health Department there have been over 2000 wells located within the City limits. Due to the number of wells, the wells were not specifically located for this WPP. Well logs and locations are available in the MGS Hennepin County CWI. The well logs for the 18 active municipal wells are included in Appendix C. 2.7 Water Quantity 2.7.1 Surface Water Quantity An updated Stormwater Management Plan and surface water study is currently being completed for the City. The plan is scheduled to be completed in 2000 -2001. Watershed data is available in the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District, 1998 Engineer's Annual Report, included as Appendix B of this WPP. Wellhead Protection A- EDINA9801.00 City of Edina, Minnesota Page 13 2.7.2 Water Use Conflicts The City does not have information regarding water use conflicts. According to the DNR, no water use conflicts exist within Edina. 2.7.3 Water Appropriation A list of water appropriation permits was acquired from the DNR. The non - municipal, groundwater, appropriation permits within Edina have been summarized in Table 6 below. Table 6 Groundwater Appropriation Permits Permittee Purpose Unique Well Aquifer Permitted Use Permitted Number GPM Use GY Oxmoor Lake Assn Water Level 147864 OPCJ 50 4.0 Maintenance Edina Country Club* Golf Course 161443 OPDC /CJDN 2800 90 Fairview Southdale Heating and A/C 206373 OPDC 50 7.2 Hospital Daytons Heating and A/C 206375 OPDC 1000 50 Indianhead Lake Water Level 222905 OSTP /CJDN 200 10 Improvement Assn Maintenance Concordia Properties Heating and A/C 433288 Unspecified 1600 210 LLC Interlachen Country Golf Course 453805 Unspecified 225 3960 Club* Avanti Leasing Inc. Pollution 459219 Unspecified 35 18.4 Confinement Duke Realty Industrial 617378 Unspecified 240 126.5 Investments Processing * Represents multiple appropriation permits from one well. GPM - Gallons per minute. MGY - Million gallons per year OPDC - Prairie du Chien aquifer CJDN - Jordan aquifer OSTP - St. Peter Sandstone aquifer OPCJ - Prairie du Chien - Jordan aquifer 2.8 Water Quality 2.8.1 Surface Water Quality Nine Mile Creek sampling has been conducted since 1968. The historical and current results of the surface water quality monitoring are provided in Appendix E of the 1998 Engineer's Annual Report. 'A copy of the report is included as Appendix B of this WPP. 2.8.2 Groundwater Quality In accordance with Minnesota Rules Chapter 4720, and 40 CFR Part 141, the City collects water samples from the water supply system annually, or in some cases quarterly, for laboratory analysis. Copies of laboratory reports and water quality results are available through the MDH Division A- EDINA9801.00 Wellhead Protection Page 14 City of Edina, Minnesota of Environmental Health. The water quality monitoring schedule and parameter lists are also available from the MDH. For the calendar year of 1998, no contaminants were detected at levels that exceeded federal standards. The results of the monitoring are now published annually in the Edina Water Quality Report. The report is sent out annually to all Edina residents. A copy of the 1999 report is included as Appendix E. 3.0 Wellhead Protection Area Delineations A report titled Wellhead Protection Area Delineations and Vulnerability Assessments was completed by SEH on behalf of the City, and submitted to the MDH in November 1998. The delineations of the WHPAs for the 18 municipal wells were performed and summarized in the report. The WHPAs for the wells screened in the Prairie du Chien - Jordan aquifer are depicted in Figure 10. The WHPAs for the Mount Simon - Hinckley aquifer wells are depicted in Figure 11. Analytic element groundwater modeling programs were used to delineate the WHPAs. The Multiple Layer Analytic Element Method (MLAEM) was utilized for the Prairie du Chien - Jordan aquifer, and the Capture Zone Analytic Element Method (CZAEM) was utilized for the Mount Simon - Hinckley Aquifer. The delineation methods and data elements were summarized in the November 1998 report. In addition, figures depicting the WHPAs in detail for each well were provided in the November 1998 report (see Appendix A). 4.0 Drinking Water Supply Management Area Delineations The DWSMAs for each of the 18 municipal wells were identified in the November 1998 Wellhead Protection Area Delineations and Vulnerability Assessments report provided in Appendix A of this report. The DWSMAs were determined based on the calculated WHPAs and the legal property boundaries within the City as described in the report. Figures 12 and 13 depict the DWSMAs for the Municipal Wells.. 5.0 Vulnerability Assessments The vulnerability of the wells and their DWSMAs were evaluated in the Wellhead Protection Area Delineations and Vulnerability Assessments report dated November 1998 (see Appendix A). The vulnerability assessments were based on information received from the MDH, the MGS 1989 Geologic Atlas of Hennepin County, and the well logs of the 18 municipal wells. As previously discussed, due to a tritium level of 1.5 T.U. recorded in Well 14, all fifteen wells screened in the Prairie du Chien - Jordan aquifer were classified vulnerable (Wells 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, and 19). Wellhead Protection A- EDINA9801.00 City of Edina, Minnesota Page 15 A DWSMA was classified vulnerable if the geologic susceptibility rating is High Medium or High in the vicinity of the DWSMA. Based on the information and data gathered in the November 1998 report, the DWSMAs for Wells 11 and 18 were classified as vulnerable. Figure 14 depicts the DWSMAs for these two wells. None of the other DWSMAs for the municipal wells screened in the Prairie du Chien - Jordan aquifer were classified vulnerable. Neither the wells nor the DWSMAs for the three municipal wells screened in the Mount Simon - Hinckley aquifer (Wells 9, 10, and 12) were classified vulnerable. 6.0 Potential Contaminant Source Inventory A Potential Contaminant Source Inventory (PCSI) was performed for the Prairie du Chien - Jordan aquifer DWSMAs. Vista Information Solutions, Inc. (Vista) was retained to conduct a file search of state and federal databases to identify sites, within Hennepin County, that are known to have, or have the potential for, soil and/or groundwater contamination. These sites included Superfund sites, hazardous waste sites, solid waste facilities, landfills and dumps, voluntary investigation and cleanup (VIC) sites, leaking underground storage tank (LUST) sites, spill sites, underground and aboveground storage tank (UST /AST) sites, and hazardous waste generators and transporters within Hennepin County. The information obtained from Vista was provided in electronic GIS format, and SEH compiled the sites that were located within the DWSMAs of the 15 municipal wells screened in the Prairie du Chien - Jordan aquifer. The PCS data obtained from Vista are provided in Appendix F. Figures 15 through 22 depict the locations of identified Potential Contaminant Sources (PCSs) with the DWSMAs. 6.1 Superfund Sites and Hazardous Waste Sites No federally- listed Superfund sites were identified within any of the DWSMAs of wells screened in the Prairie du Chien - Jordan aquifer. However, one federally - listed hazardous waste site was identified in the DWSMA for Well 11. This site, Seagate Technology, is located at 7801 Computer Avenue South, within the Bloomington, Minnesota city limits. The EPA Identification Number for Seagate Technology is MND000293076. Specifically, the site is listed as a RCRA Corrective Action Site indicating a potential release of hazardous wastes, or hazardous waste handling violations. Figure 15 depicts the location of Seagate Technology in the DWSMA for Well 11. 6.2 Solid Waste Sites One solid waste site, Aztec Industries, was identified within the DWSMA for Well 11 as shown in Figure 16. The site is classified as an "open dump" located at 4450 West 78th Street within the Bloomington, Minnesota city limits. No other landfills, dumps or solid waste transfer stations were identified within the DWSMAs for the municipal wells screened in the Prairie du Chien - Jordan aquifer. A- EDINA9801.00 Wellhead Protection Page 16 City of Edina, Minnesota t 6.3 Voluntary Investigation and Cleanup Sites Three Voluntary Investigation and Cleanup (VIC) sites were identified within two of the Prairie du Chien - Jordan aquifer DWSMAs. As shown in Figure 17, one of the sites is within the DWSMA for Well 11 and two of the sites are within the DWSMA for Well 13. The status of the VIC site in the DWSMA for Well 11 (MPCA Identification Number VP2890) is "closed ". It is specifically located at 7625 Parklawn Avenue in Edina. The status of the two VIC sites within the DWSMA for Well 13 (HCMF and Precious Metal Platers) are "active ". Both sites are within the city limits of Hopkins, Minnesota. HCMF is specifically located at 320 Washington Avenue and Precious Metal Platers is located at 139/149 North Jackson Avenue. 6.4 Leaking Underground Storage Tank Sites Fifty -one (51) leaking underground storage tank (LUST). sites were identified within seven of the DWSMAs. LUST sites are facilities where a storage tank or associated piping leaked, spilled or released a petroleum - based product. According to the data from Vista, thirty (30) of the LUST sites are within the DWSMA for Well 2. Nine of the LUST sites are located in the DWSMA for Well 13 and five sites are within the Well 7 DWSMA. Four of the sites are within the combined DWSMA for Wells 4 and 6. The vulnerable DWSMAs for Wells 11 and 18 have two and one identified LUST sites respectively. The nine LUST sites in the DWSMA for Well 13 are all located within the city limits of Hopkins, Minnesota. Specific information regarding the LUST sites, including the MPCA Leaksite Number, and the name and address of the facility are included in Appendix F. The locations of the LUST sites are shown on Figure 18. 6.5 Spills Twenty-two (22) spills were identified within the DWSMAs for the wells screened in the Prairie du Chien - Jordan aquifer. Seven of the spills occurred within the Bloomington, Minnesota city limits, in the DWSMA for Well 11. All seven spills occurred at Seagate Technology at 7801 Computer Avenue South. Seven additional spill sites occurred within the DWSMA for Well 18. Four of the seven sites were at NSP located at 3460 70th Street West. Of the remaining eight spills, three occurred within the DWSMA for Well 13, two occurred within the DWSMA for Well 2, and one spill occurred in the DWSMAs for Wells 3, 7 and 16. Details regarding each spill incident, such as the responsible party, the address of the spill site, and the material spilled, are provided in Appendix F. Figure 19 depicts the spill sites within the Edina DWSMAs. Wellhead Protection A- EDINA9801.00 City of Edina, Minnesota Page 17 6.6 Hazardous Waste Violators As depicted on Figure 20, four hazardous waste violators sites were identified in the DWSMAs. These facilities have been in violation of handling, treating or storing hazardous wastes. Two of the sites, Seagate Technology and Aztec Industries, are located in the vulnerable DWSMA for Well 11 in the Bloomington, Minnesota city limits. Another site, APS Inc., is also within the DWSMA for Well 11, but is located within the Edina city limits. The fourth site, Hennepin County Public Services, is located in the DWSMA for Well 13, within the Hopkins, Minnesota city limits. Details regarding the four sites are included in Appendix F. The site details include the EPA Identification Number, the site address, and the violation and corrective action dates. 6.7 Underground Storage Tank Sites Forty -seven (47) underground storage tank (UST) sites were identified within 12 of the Edina municipal well DWSMAs. These sites are properties and facilities that currently have or historically had USTs registered with the MPCA. Of the 47 UST sites, ten are in the DWSMA for Well 13 and are located within the city limits of Hopkins, Minnesota. In addition, seven of the UST sites are within the DWSMA for Well 16, five are in the Well 7 DWSMA, and four are in the Well 2 DWSMA. The DWSMA for Wells 4 and 6 have three sites, whereas the DWSMAs for Wells 5 and 19 each have two sites. The DWSMAs for Wells 3 and 14 each have one UST site. Eight UST sites were identified within the vulnerable DWSMA for Well 11. One of the sites is located within the Bloomington, Minnesota city limits. Four UST sites were also identified within the DWSMA for Well 18. Details regarding the UST sites are provided in Appendix F. The details include the MPCA Site Identification Number, and the sites' names and addresses. Figure 21 shows the locations of the UST sites. 6.8 Aboveground Storage Tank Site Five aboveground storage tank (AST) sites were identified within the DWSMAs for Wells 11 and 13. These are facilities with ASTs registered with the MPCA. Two of the AST sites, Roberts Automatic Products Inc. located at 4451 West 76th Street and Thexton Manufacturing at 7685 Parklawn Avenue, are within the vulnerable DWSMA for Well 11. The other three sites are in the DWSMA for Well 13, but are located within the Hopkins city limits. The MPCA Site Identification Number, and the site names and addresses are provided in Appendix F. Figure 21 depicts the locations of the AST sites. A- EDINA9801.00 Wellhead Protection Page 18 City of Edina, Minnesota C A 6.9 Large Quantity Hazardous Waste Generators According to the Vista report, three large quantity hazardous waste generators were identified within the Prairie du Chien - Jordan DWSMAs. However, two of the facilities no longer exist. A large - quantity hazardous waste generator is defined as a facility that produces at least 1000 kilograms of non - acutely hazardous waste per month, or 1 kilogram of acutely hazardous waste per month. The existing facility is Seagate Technology located at 7801 Computer Avenue South in Bloomington (DWSMA for Well 11). The two former facilities were Blacks Photography located at 5010 France Avenue South in Edina (DWSMA for Well 3) and a Hennepin County Household Hazardous Waste Facility located at 320 Washington Avenue South in Hopkins (DWSMA for Well 13). 6.10 Small Quantity Hazardous Waste Generators Thirty -three (33) small quantity hazardous waste generators were identified within the DWSMAs of 11 of the City's municipal wells. A small quantity hazardous waste generator is defined as a facility that produces between 100 and 1000 kilograms of non - acutely hazardous waste per month. The generators are located in the DWSMAs for Wells 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 11, 13, 14, 18 and 19. Ten of the facilities are located within the vulnerable DWSMA for Well 11. In addition, two of the facilities are located within the Well 18 vulnerable DWSMA. Details regarding the sites are included in Appendix F. The locations of the sites are shown in Figure 22. 6.11 Hazardous Waste Transporters Two hazardous waste transporters were identified in the Edina DWSMAs. One is located within the DWSMA for Well 14 ( Braemer Golf Maintenance Building), and the other is located within the DWSMA for Wells 4 and 6 (Normandale Lutheran Church). Details regarding the two sites are included in Appendix F. The locations of the two sites are depicted in Figure 22. 6.12 Golf Courses Four golf courses (two private and two public) exist within Edina: Braemer Golf Course, Edina Country Club, Fred Richards Golf Course, and Interlachen Country Club. Figure 23 depicts the locations of the golf courses. The DWSMAs for Wells 2 and 4 intersect the Edina Country Club. The DWSMA for Well 14 is within Braemer Golf Course. The Well 11 and Well 13 DWSMAs intersect the Fred Richards Golf course and Interlachen Country Club, respectively. Specifically, the Fred Richards Golf Course is located at 7640 Parklawn Avenue. Wellhead Protection A- EDINA9801.00 City of Edina, Minnesota Page 00 7.0 Impact of Changes to Public Water Supply Wells 7.1 Changes In The Next 10 Years Edina is an established suburb of Minneapolis, and is therefore, almost completely developed. Little vacant, open or undeveloped land remains within the City limits. No significant changes are expected in the next ten years to the City's physical environment, land uses, surface waters or groundwater. New development within the City is expected to be minor commercial and residential development and redevelopment, and local infrastructure upgrades such as surface water and stormwater drainage improvements, street improvements and school improvements. No major construction projects have been identified by the City or local developers. Although the City is nearing complete development, opportunities do exist for redevelopment that may result in conversion of low intensity land uses to those requiring additional City services. A Water System Plan study, published in 1988, recommended several improvements to the municipal water supply system including a new water tower and the installation of Well 19. Future water supply needs for Edina were calculated in the April 1999 Public Water Supply Emergency and Conservation Plan. The projections were based on the City's LOGIS water billing data. Table 7 summarizes the results. Table 7 Projected Water Supply Demand - OJ ganons per day per person z - 38 gallons per day per employee The City's current, maximum, well pumping capacity is 22.03 million gallons per day (mgd) which is sufficient to sustain the future growth projections. The combined treatment plan capacity of 9.8 mgd can also accommodate the projected future population and employment needs through the year 2020. 7.2 Impacts of Changes The minor changes to the City's physical environment, land use, surface waters and groundwater will have little to no impact on the Prairie du Chien - Jordan aquifer or the Mount Simon - Hinckley aquifer. The A- EDINA9801.00 Wellhead Protection Page 20 City of Edina, Minnesota 2000 2010 2020 Population 47,500 48,500 49,000 Employment 56,000 58,500 60,000 Population Demand' 7.3 mgd 7.4 mgd 7.5 mgd Employment Demand 2.1 mgd- 2.2 mgd 2.3 mgd Total 9.4md 9.6 mgd 9.8 mgd - OJ ganons per day per person z - 38 gallons per day per employee The City's current, maximum, well pumping capacity is 22.03 million gallons per day (mgd) which is sufficient to sustain the future growth projections. The combined treatment plan capacity of 9.8 mgd can also accommodate the projected future population and employment needs through the year 2020. 7.2 Impacts of Changes The minor changes to the City's physical environment, land use, surface waters and groundwater will have little to no impact on the Prairie du Chien - Jordan aquifer or the Mount Simon - Hinckley aquifer. The A- EDINA9801.00 Wellhead Protection Page 20 City of Edina, Minnesota implementation of the City's emergency and conservation plan is expected to reduce the demand for public water supplies, and consequently the reliance on the two aquifers. i 8.0 Issues, Problems and Opportunities With the installation of Well 19 and the construction of an additional water tower in 1989, there are no major physical improvements planned for the City's water supply system. However, there are improvements necessary to upgrade and maintain the system. Well pump maintenance is conducted annually. Lift station reconstruction or rehabilitation, treatment plant replacement, and water main replacement are continually conducted. The City currently has three municipal wells obtaining groundwater for municipal supply from the Mount Simon - Hinckley aquifer. The DNR has implemented a moratorium on approving new appropriation permits from this aquifer due to the rapid decrease in static water levels and the apparent slow recharge to the aquifer. The other 15 municipal wells in Edina are completed in the Prairie du Chien - Jordan aquifer. Although the City does not anticipate a substantial increase in the demand for municipal water in the future, the sources of potable water for public supply are limited. Should a portion or all of the Prairie du Chien - Jordan aquifer become unusable due to contamination or overuse, the City could i potentially incur large costs to find an alternative water source and/or treat impacted groundwater prior to its public use. According to MN Statute 103G.271, Subdivision 4a, in extreme emergencies, or if there are no feasible or practical alternatives, the City could use the Mount Simon - Hinckley aquifer for water supplies. Since Edina is a fully- developed suburb, there is very little existing vacant/undeveloped property within the DWSMAs. Redirecting established land uses would be costly and difficult financially and politically. The City is in the process of completing its Comprehensive Plan. This provides an opportunity to include the implementation of WHP- related objectives and policies into the plan. Most notably, the City may specify requirements for redevelopment activities within the DWSMAs to prevent the construction of high risk PCSs within the vulnerable DWSMAs for Wells 11 and 18 or if necessary, all the DWSMAs. This could also be an opportunity to enact any immediate or future regulatory measures for existing PCSs identified within any or all DWSMAs. The City is currently updating their Stormwater Management Plan. The plan will be completed in 2000 -2001. The City will use this WPP as a resource when finalizing the updated Stormwater Management Plan. Wellhead Protection A- EDINA9801.00 City of Edina, Minnesota Page 21 9.0 Wellhead Protection The following sections discuss the City's goals, objectives and plans of action for their WPP Plan. These goals, objectives and action plan are a culmination of the data element information, the WHPA and DWSMA delineations, the vulnerability assessments, potential contaminant source inventory, and the issues, problems and opportunities presented earlier in this report. The overall purpose of Edina's WPP is to prevent the City's sources of public water supply from becoming impacted or contaminated. To meet this intent, the City of Edina has identified and adopted the specific WPP goals listed below: 1) Implement a Wellhead Protection public education program specifically targeting the property owners and PCSs residing within the DWSMAs. 2) Promote the proper sealing of all unused or inactive wells located within the DWSMAs. 3) Create and maintain a database of PCSs to monitor and manage land uses within the DWSMAs for Wells 11 and 18. 4) Review . zoning ordinances for regulating land uses during future redevelopment of properties within the DWSMAs. 5) Incorporate this WPP Plan into the City's Comprehensive Plan and use it as a resource in the City planning process. 6) Continue to closely monitor the groundwater chemistry from both the Prairie du Chien - Jordan and Mount Simon - Hinckley aquifers. 7) Maintain a database on water use quantities, and continue to implement policies for reducing the demand for public water supply. 8) Enhance the proposed WPP Contamination Response Plan. 9.1 Goal 1 - Public Education Program The City will implement a public education program for Wellhead Protection and underground storage tank management, specifically targeting the property owners and PCSs residing within the DWSMAs. 9.1.1 Objective To minimize and eliminate contamination to the soils and shallow groundwater regime within the DWSMAs due to improper or erroneous handling, use, storage, and/or disposal of hazardous chemicals and compounds. This is most effectively accomplished by educating residents and businesses about contaminant transport and the importance of maintaining clean water supplies. A- EDINA9801.00 Wellhead Protection Page 22 City of Edina, Minnesota t i a 9.1.2 Plan of Action The City will initiate and implement a public education program to inform residents specifically about this WPP, and about Wellhead Protection in general. In addition, underground storage tank management will be included in the program. Within two years of the adoption of the WPP, the City will take the following actions to meet this objective. • The City will mail letters to all residents and businesses within the DWSMAs to make them aware that their property is within a DWSMA. The June 1998 MDH publication titled Wellhead Protection For Minnesota will be enclosed with the letter. The City will use the Annual Water Quality Report and the About Town publication to publish articles explaining Wellhead Protection and the results of the WPP, and about properly removing privately- owned unused fuel oil underground storage tanks. • MDH documents will be available at City Hall for public review and use. In addition, the City's official Web page will have a link to the MDH and MPCA Web pages to direct residents to more information. • Periodically, time will be allotted during public meetings for questions and comments from the public regarding Wellhead Protection and specifically the WPP. 9.2 Goal 2 - Private Well Abandonment Program The City will promote the proper sealing of all unused or inactive wells located within the City. 9.2.1 Objective To reduce the number of wells that could potentially transport contaminants to the aquifers used by the City for municipal water supply. 9.2.2 Plan of Action Edina will promote the proper sealing of unused or inactive wells within the DWSMAs. To meet this goal and its objective, the City will conduct the following actions within two years of the adoption of this WPP. • The City will rely on the efforts of the well sealing programs sponsored through Hennepin County and the MDH. • Articles relating to proper well abandonment will be published in the Annual Water Quality Report and the About Town publication. The City will request that the MDH send copies of new well permits and well sealing records within the City limits to City staff. Copies of the records will be kept on file at City Hall. Wellhead Protection A- EDINA9801.00 City of Edina, Minnesota Page 23 9.3 Goal 3 - Potential Contaminant Source Database The City will create and maintain a database of PCSs to monitor and manage land uses within the vulnerable DWSMAs for Wells 11 and 18. 9.3.1 Objective A database would allow the City to identify the number of PCSs within and immediately adjacent to the vulnerable DWSMAs for Wells 11 and 18, respond more quickly to spills, releases and identified contamination, and draft policies for future redevelopment of properties within these two DWSMAs. In addition, the specific locations of PCSs could be verified and precisely identified on city maps. 9.3.2 Plan of Action, The City will develop and maintain a database of PCSs located within the vulnerable DWSMAs for Wells 11 and 18. The following actions will be conducted by the City within two years of the adoption of this WPP, to meet the objective, and reach the goal. • Using the information gathered from Vista for this WPP, the City will create,, develop and, maintain a database of PCSs within the two vulnerable DWSMAs. The specific locations of sites within or adjacent to the DWSMAs will be determined and/or verified. Updated information will be collected from a file search firm every two years. • The City will request copies of MPCA correspondence for the regulated PCSs within the DWSMAs for Wells 11 and 18. The correspondence will be kept on file at City Hall and the information will be incorporated into the database. • The locations and PCS data will be maintained in a GIS format. 9.4 Goal 4 - Future Land Redevelopment Zoning Plan The City will review zoning ordinances for regulating land uses during future redevelopment of properties within the DWSMAs. 9.4.1 Objective By drafting zoning ordinances for future redevelopment of properties within the DWSMAs, the City will minimize and reduce the number of PCSs that could potentially affect the aquifers used for the municipal water. supply. 9.4.2 Plan of Action Areas of commercial and industrial land use within DWSMAs may be regulated by the City when redeveloped. Within five years of the adoption of this WPP, the City intends to pursue the following actions to meet this objective. A- EDINA9801.00 Wellhead Protection Page 24 City of Edina, Minnesota r • The City will formally adopt the state tank rules for regulated tanks, and the state hazardous waste program. • The City will adhere to the waste policies outlined in the P Environmental Quality section of the City's Comprehensive Plan. • During. future redevelopment of commercial and industrial properties within the DWSMAs, the City will evaluate the feasibility of rezoning or regulating businesses with high risk land uses, to minimize the potential for soil and/or groundwater contamination. • Continue to adhere to the City's Turf Management Plan. 9.5 Goal 5 - Wellhead Protection Plan Implementation # The City will incorporate this WPP into the City's Comprehensive Plan, and use it as a resource in the City planning process. 9.5.1 Objective With the use of this WPP, the City will make more educated decisions and formulate better policies regarding land use, water supply and use, and groundwater protection. 9.5.2 Plan of Action This WPP will be incorporated into the Comprehensive Plan for Edina, and will be used in decision - making processes related to future land use and management within the city. The City will undertake the following actions within 12 months of the adoption of this WPP to meet this objective. • Copies of the WPP will be distributed to the various councils within Edina's local government. P • The WPP will be included as a section within the City's Comprehensive Plan. • Copies of the WPP will be sent to neighboring cities in which the Edina DWSMAs extend (Bloomington and Hopkins). • Copies of the WPP will be available for any and all units of local government upon request. • The WPP will be submitted to the appropriate Hennepin County and State government offices. 9.6 Goal 6 - Groundwater Quality Monitoring The City will continue to closely monitor the groundwater chemistry of the Prairie du Chien - Jordan and Mount Simon - Hinckley aquifers. 9.6.1 Objective By closely monitoring the groundwater chemistry in both aquifers, the City will be more able to quickly react to any impacts to the water supply. Wellhead Protection A- EDINA9801.00 City of Edina, Minnesota Page 25 9.6.2 Plan of Action The City intends to continue monitoring the groundwater quality of the public water supply in accordance with Minnesota Rules and 40 CFR Part 141. The following actions will be performed as part of the WPP. • The City will create and maintain a database of current and historical detections and concentrations of inorganic and organic compounds and microorganisms detected in the public water supply during routine water quality monitoring. The information will be used by City staff to identify and evaluate any trends in the water quality over time. • Should the levels of potential contaminants show an increasing trend, the City will attempt to identify the source of the pollutant(s) using the PCS database and other WPP actions. • The results of the monitoring will continue to be summarized in the City's Annual Water Quality Report, distributed to all City residents. 9.7 Goal 7 - Reduction in Public Water Supply Demand The City will maintain a database of water use quantities, and will continue to implement policies for reducing the demand for public water supply. 9.7.1 Objective The trends in water use identified through a database will enable the City to make better policy decisions regarding the public water supply. In addition, by ultimately reducing the demand for municipal water, the reliance on groundwater resources will be diminished. 9.7.2 Plan of Action The City will take the following actions to continue to reduce the demand for public water supply. • Continue to enforce the odd -even sprinkling ban to conserve water during high- demand summer months. (Section 1115 - Water Emergencies and Irrigation Bans of the City Ordinance). • Institute a ban on sprinkling during the mid -day period, to reduce water loss from evaporation. • Conduct public education programs to inform Edina residents and businesses of the importance of good water use practices and water conservation. • Continue implementing water conservation ordinances and requiring water - conserving fixtures in new developments and remodeling in accordance with state and federal policies and codes. • Apply the conservation efforts and policies outlined in the City's Public Water Supply Emergency and Conservation Plan. A- EDINA9801.00 Wellhead Protection Page 26 City of Edina, Minnesota 9.8 Goal 8 - Response Plan The City will implement the proposed WPP Contamination Response Plan, and make enhancements over time. 9.8.1 Objective By developing a formal Response Plan for incidents of contamination, proactive, remedial measures may be more quickly implemented, and actions can be taken to minimize the potential of an immediate impact to the municipal water supply. 9.8.2 Plan of Action The City will implement the Contamination Response Plan for subsurface contamination identified within the one year time -of- travel areas of the 15 municipal wells screened in the Prairie du Chien - Jordan aquifer. Within five years of the adoption of this WPP the following actions will be taken to enhance the Response Plan. • The City will develop and maintain a database of PCSs within the d DWSMAs for Wells 11 and 18. However, the City will specifically flag PCSs that currently exist within the one year time -of- travel areas of each well. By doing so, the city will be able to closely monitor activities on these properties, and more readily identify potential subsurface contamination incidents. • Communication between state, county and city agencies and Edina will be enhanced when a contamination incident is discovered or reported. Specifically, as discussed in previous goals and objectives, the City will request copies of correspondence from the various state agencies (e.g. MPCA, MDH, MDA, DNR) regarding PCSs within the one year time -of- travel areas. 10.0 Evaluation Program In accordance with Minnesota Rules Chapter 4720.5270, Subpart 4, the City will evaluate the WPP every 2.5 years or when the WPP is amended. To effectively evaluate the progress of meeting the objectives and reaching the goals, the City proposes the following. • Publish a report every two years that will: 1) Briefly discuss the progress and outcomes of the Wellhead Protection public education program; 2) List the number of wells sealed in the City since the adoption of the WPP; 3) Present the information contained in the PCS database; 4) Summarize the historical and most recent water quality monitoring results; Wellhead Protection A- EDINA9801.00 City of Edina, Minnesota Page 00 5) Compile and present historical and most recent water use data and briefly discuss the progress of reducing the demand for water; and, 6) Briefly review of the progress of the Contamination Response enhancement, and discuss any developments in regulating and zoning properties. 7) Present a plan of action for meeting the remaining portions of the WPP objectives. Finalize the City's Comprehensive Plan with the incorporation of the WPP. • Document and keep records of the various parties who receive a copy of the WPP. The list will be reviewed every 2.5 years. 11.0 Alternate Water Supply and Continency Strategy The following sections discuss the City's alternate water supply plan and contingency strategy as outlined in Edina's Public Water Supply Emergency and Conservation Plan published in April 1999. 11.1 Alternative Sources For Water Supply Other than the Prairie du Chien - Jordan and the Mount Simon - Hinckley aquifers, no other bedrock aquifers are viable for water supplies in the vicinity of Edina. Currently, there are no alternative sources for water supply, other than interconnections with surrounding cities that could be used within Edina's water system. However, the expense of interconnections would be extremely high and not cost effective from a public standpoint. There may be an opportunity for area industries to review reusing water, but given the relatively low annual use of water by commercial and industrial businesses in Edina, this also may not be cost effective. Since most businesses in the City are supplied primarily by municipal water, there are no private high capacity wells which could be used to augment the municipal water supply. However, the City can routinely interchange water with adjacent communities when isolated water emergencies occur. Communities contiguous to Edina do not have treatment techniques similar to those existing in the City's system, and water pressures are slightly different. Interconnections do not pose a physical or mechanical problem for a limited period of time. However, businesses within Edina that have specialized water needs may be negatively affected. A- EDINA9801.00 Wellhead Protection Page 28 City of Edina, Minnesota The feasibility of utilizing surface water as the City's primary source of water during non - emergency periods is limited. Constructing facilities that would utilize surface water would not be cost effecn tive, given the investments into the groundwater water supply system. addition, the Minnesota and Mississippi Rivers are a considerable distance from Edina, and the cost of connecting to the existing water supply system would be prohibitive. Although there are several surface waters within and adjacent to the City, they may be groundwater recharge sources, making their use impractical and counterproductive. In the event that the Mount Simon - Hinckley aquifer becomes impacted and/or unusable for water supplies, the City will temporarily cease using Wells 9, 10, and 12, and in the interim, will rely on the 15 municipal wells screened in the Prairie du Chein - Jordan aquifer. Should one or two municipal wells, screened in the Prairie du Chien - Jordan aquifer, become impacted, the City will temporarily stop using those wells and rely on the other municipal wells for public supply. The City will immediately begin assessing the feasibility of remediating the impacted water supplies. 11.2 Water Use Reduction and Allocation Procedures The City has implemented measures aimed at public conservation of water, in addition to procedures for short-term emergency situations. Since 1981, a demand reduction program that includes lawn and garden sprinkling restrictions, has been initiated on an annual basis during the summer months in an effort to conserve water. 11.3 Water Supply Shortage Plan The following subsections describe the City's plan for addressing short- and long -term water reduction and allocation measures during times of water shortages. 11.3.1 Annual Conservation Efforts The following techniques are utilized on an annual basis: • Public Education: The City has developed an informal educational program through the City newsletter, cable television, utility bill staffers, and the local newspapers to inform the public of the need for water conservation. • Sprinkling Restriction Ordinance: The City annually institutes a sprinkling restriction program with penalties for all users abusing the municipal water supply system. The program restricts lawn sprinkling on an odd/even basis from May through September. • Promotion of Energy Efficient Retrofitting Programs: The City's Building Department provides assistance to residents and contractors regarding the water conservation regulations of the State Plumbing i Wellhead Protection A- EDINA9801.00 City of Edina, Minnesota Page 29 Code and distributes NSP energy conservation materials. • Utilizing block methods for water utility payments. 11.3.2 Water Emergency Conditions During periods of severe drought or other similar conditions, the City institutes procedures that are more stringent than water conservation efforts. A water emergency condition is defined as levels in the water towers and reservoirs low enough to threaten fire fighting abilities, or that the water supply production facilities are incapable of reestablishing a minimum 24 -hour water reserve in storage. The Director of Public Works establishes the threshold for determining when conditions warrant the implementation of emergency actions. The emergency actions include administrative orders, ordinance provisions, and a utility operation program as discussed below. 11.3.2.1 Administrative Action The City Council and/or City Manager will declare an emergency and adopt the emergency ordinance limiting water use. An educational program describing the severity and effects of the emergency will be instituted as well as a description of the regulatory and enforcement procedures included with the ordinance. 11.3.2.2 Emergency Plain_ The emergency plan includes provisions that address the specific situation. The plan may include, but not be limited to, the following items: • Prohibit outdoor sprinkling on a continual basis. • Increase penalties and fees for violation of the sprinkling ordinance. • Limit or prohibit swimming pool filling, car washing, and other similar nonessential residential uses. • Limit or prohibit use of water for commercial car washes. • Restrict restaurants from serving water to customers on a voluntary basis. • As appropriate require operators of large air conditioning systems to recycle cooled water. The performance of routine public operations shall be redirected to reduce water demand. The following actions may affect the aesthetics of the City, but can be easily implemented on a short-term basis and will not harm the City facilities on a long -term basis. • Reduce sewer cleaning activities. A- EDINA9801.00 Wellhead Protection Page 30 City of Edina, Minnesota • Reduce fire hydrant and main flushing activities to a minimum. • Eliminate street cleaning activities. • Eliminate fire fighting training practices that utilize water. • Purchase water from the neighboring cities if the emergency condition is limited to the Edina water supply system. • Limit backwashing activities at treatment facilities. • Bypass the iron and manganese filter systems in extreme emergencies. In addition, the City shall utilize or construct emergency interconnections to provide municipal water to residents or businesses that obtain water from other sources. These interconnections will only be utilized if there are no alternative sources of water and they do not create damage to existing facilities. 11.3.3 Water Supply Allocation Procedure In the event of a municipal water supply emergency, the water users will be prioritized. The allocation system should also be utilized to distribute water from other sources in the event that the City can no longer deliver potable water. The following lists in descending order the priority users in accordance with State Statute 103G Part 261. Priority One: Delivery of water to users of domestic water supply excluding industrial and commercial uses, and use for power that meets emergency contingency requirements. This includes water delivery to all households, places of business, and places of assembly including schools, Fairview Southdale Hospital, and places of employment. Priority Two: Delivery of water to uses that consume less than 10,000 gallons per day. This includes commercial and industrial businesses where water is utilized for production and service. This priority does not include those businesses or portions of their operation where water use is considered nonessential , such as outdoor sprinkling and vehicles washing. • Priority Three: Agricultural irrigation and processing of agricultural products. • Priority Four: Power production in excess of the use noted in Priority One. • Priority Five: Uses that are considered essential, but previously noted. • Priority Six: Nonessential water uses. Wellhead Protection A- EDINA9801.00 City of Edina, Minnesota Page 31 F References Wellhead Protection Area Delineations and Vulnerability Assessments, November 1998. SEH Inc. Public Water Supply Emergency and Conservation Plan, April 1999. SEH Inc. 1998 Engineer's Annual Report - Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. Barr Engineering Company Draft City of Edina Comprehensive Plan. Edina City Code. Geologic Atlas, Hennepin County, Minnesota, 1989. Minnesota Geological Survey, University of Minnesota. Second Scoping Notice, May 20, 1999. Minnesota Department of Health. Hennepin County Soil Survey, 1974. United States Soil Conservation Service. Nine Mile Creek Watershed District 509 Plan, May 1996. Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. Water Resources Data - Minnesota -Water Year 1998, 1999. USGS, Water - Data Report MN -98 -1. City of Edina Flood Insurance Rate Map, May 1, 1980. National Flood Insurance Program, Community-Panel Number 270160 0006B, U.S. Department of HUD. Protected Waters and Wetlands Map Hennepin County, 1983. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. National Wetlands Inventory Map, 1991. USGS, Osseo Minnesota Quadrangle Map. Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps, Minneapolis, Edina, Morningside, St. Louis Park, 1912, 1941, 1952. M+ Figures h a 0 n l E d r r nl n I u u 1 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA HENNEPIN COUNTY — MINNESOTA N N0. I DATE ISSUE /REVISIONS DRAWN BY OC REVIEW OC CHECK WELLHEAD PROTECTION PLAN PROD. 801 w.�.�' ���� � � EDINA9801 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA �' T DA7E 70/25/99 w C5 N V_ 91 Z JL J7c A . U_ LJ Ed 47 1 [C 57 77 h f (v rc- 7 h __7 A, jr' M-:r -IFYIq f 4Cj jF 4 'k -S A—L ur "I T111 A IF -7 J _ZZ N — Named v lfwvcl JAN Ca) IF r 0 1111 A-Y 4! A dZ.; e.r dZ_ ou AL bad uu Ll--- LL 1 - ; r, �1 ; �.: ?' ;; Am - - - - - - ly o Of IF` A i- 0 IV" LL jt 7r t, -71 _L1 i r oi- p�g - It 1 O 4U. zj Ld 0 ALA 0 -.Le-,f sf)be C) Ira zz_ Dr 7 W ILL A jO 5 u o 2!� � CZ.c V A-I- ) 1W.n op X7. 1W rr) N T ..... . . . . . 7 &U� 7T� "o will" O r 43 dsggndD WO [Z:tt 616-1-10—zi -_)-ma I it \ WAS 7 ZY-i 9 I'llmill 12-07-9.9 t1: 21 arm CPU!65sp 0 0 n m 0 z M z > Z- rrl :2 Z o Z M 0 z > o V) I > 0 IMMM— z- vwl I rDf, CRYmi AN, ro > > S p 0 0! y r UY Z: 0 1 12-07-9.9 t1: 21 arm CPU!65sp 0 0 n m 0 z M z > Z- rrl :2 Z o Z M 0 z > o V) I > 0 IMMM— z- vwl I AN, ro > > S p CFl 12-07-9.9 t1: 21 arm CPU!65sp 0 0 n m 0 z M z > Z- rrl :2 Z o Z M 0 z > o V) I > 0 IMMM— z- vwl I #18 N 0 750 1500 3000 SCALE IN FEET LEGEND • CITY WELL LOCATION A' WELLHEAD PROTECTION PLAN CITY MAP AN® EDINA9801 RGURE - - CITY OF E©INA, MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL WELL LOCATIONS DATE 3 NO. DATE ISSUE /REVISIONS DRAWN BY OC REV1ElY QC CHECK 10/25/99 a cn �n CL U E 0 D7 0 NOTE: MAP REPRODUCED FROM 1989 MGS GEOLOGIC ATLAS OF HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA HENNEPIN COUNTY = MINNESOTA DESCRIPTION.- OF- -MAP UNITS POSTGLACIAL DEPOSITS ORGANIC DEPOSITS oa I ORGANIC DEPOSITS, DRAINED AND FILLED DES MOINES LOBE AND GRANTSBURG SUBLOBE DEPOSITS (TWIN CITIES FORMATION) to LACUSTRINE CLAY AND SILT .,,, OUTWASH j ICE — CONTACT STRATIFIED DEPOSITS LOAMY TILL SANDY TILL, TILL OF MIXED COMPOSITION SUPERIOR LOBE DEPOSITS (CROMWELL FORMATION) s ICE— CONTACT STRATIFIED DEPOSITS RlGiNAL ISSUE _ _ 9RH _t '99 �Ll K 4 9 RHS 10� �S j/�°�t'' RR _ _ _ UI I=I�ci1!'ll PROJ. NO. FIGURE - -- - WELLHEAD PROTECTION FLAN EbINA$Bbt CIfiY OF -- - _ OFDINA; MINNESOTA COY N0. Nit, DRAWN �V MAP A a a U C O Q� CJ� a � O x d w d cc / d / I� NOTE: MAP REPRODUCED FROM 1989 MGS GEOLOGIC ATLAS OF HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA HENNEPIN COUNTY - MINNESOTA -0G9 J PLATTEVILLE AND GLENWOOD FORMATIONS Osp I ST. PETER SANDSTONE PRAIRIE DU CHIEN GROUP PROJ. NO. FNO. 1 25 0 OINAL S-SUE _-_ _ __. _ — _ _ . _ ._ BRH 1 / LK t / AHB 10(9 EDINA9801 Flt E WELLHEAD PROTECTION PLAN BEDROCK A CITY OF EDINA 1AINNESOTA p MAP 10/25/99 OATE ISfiUH /REVISIONS — DRAWN BY OC fifiVIEW OC CHECK _ _ - E 0 0 rn I rl 0 I CV E i i a v� NOTE: MAP REPRODUCED FROM 1989 MGS GEOLOGIC ATLAS OF HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA HENNEPIN COUNTY - MINNESOTA DEPTH TO BEDROCK < 100' ?_loo' < 100' ? 100' < 100' >_ 100' COMPOSITION OF MATERIAL OVERLYING BEDROCK MATRIX FOR LOAMY TILL, SANDY LOAM TILL, OUTWASH, SUSCEPTIBILITY CLAY -LOAM TILL, LAKE SAND & SILT SANDY DEPOSITS, OF THE PRAIRIE LAKE CLAY & SILT ORGANIC MATERIAL DU CHIEN - JORDAN V L AQUIFER V L DEPTH TO BEDROCK < 100' ?_loo' < 100' ? 100' < 100' >_ 100' ST. PETER SS. NONE m m M HM Irl, W, ,— j HM I M H I HM DECORAH SHALE Q - — m a U) GLENWOOD FM. V L V L V L V L ? V L V L F�RI ST. PETER SS. F-EE 77-- U ; -- — - -- QUATERNARY -- -K � No. DATA - �3Ud q�N�idN$ — - - - - GLENWOOD FM. V L V L V L V L V L I V L w ST. PETER SS. It W VL -- t` VL - i GLENWOOD FM. ST. PETER SS. NONE m m M HM Irl, W, ,— j HM I M H I HM ST. PETER SS. Q - — m a U) RNARY o� ER SS. a J - HQUATERNARY VIN o, F�RI z z F-EE 77-- U ST. PETER SS. NONE m m M HM Irl, W, ,— j HM I M H I HM - — C �� -- - - OTI - � N WrELLHEAD PROT� ON LA CITY OF MINA, MINNESOTA c OF s E�neiim o� PRA1PoE C?!.1 N- Yu - AN AOUIPSF VIN o, F�RI F-EE 77-- -- — - -- -- -K � No. DATA - �3Ud q�N�idN$ — - - - - da�Wr w_ be RtACW QC CHECK — ZONE C i .ZONE AZ 7 ZONE B E ON 0 m m m 0 N 0 B NI•I� ZONE ZONE AE- / 1Yk 0 U ZONE C ZONE C ZONE ZONE C WELL #11 �Qoc ZONE C SCALE IN FEET 0 200 400 Boo N 1 Ff:FNn ZONE Al -A30 AREAS OF 100 YEAR FLOOD; BASE FLOOD ELEVATIONS AND FLOOD HAZARD FACTORS DETERMINED. ZONE 8 AREAS BETWEEN THE 100 YEAR FLOOD AND 500 YEAR FLOOD; OR CERTAIN AREA SUBJECT TO 100 YEAR FLOODING WITH AVERAGE DEPTHS LESS THAN ONE FOOT OR WHERE THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA IS LESS THAN ONE SQUARE MILE. OR AREAS PROTECTED BY LEVEES FROM THE BASE FLOOD. (MEDIUM SHADING) ZONE C AREAS OF MINIMAL FLOODING. (NO SHADING) ZONE C ZONE C D— — -- -------- --- n 1 10/25/99 ORIGINAL ISSUE BRH 10/99 CLK 10/99 AHS 10/99 ° NO. i DATE ISSUE /REVISIONS DRAWN BY QC REVIEW QC CHECK z % WELLHEAD PROTECTION PLAN FLOODPLAIN MAP FOR PROJ. NO. EDINA9801 pC FK)JRE i CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA WELL " DWSMA 7 DATE 10/25/99 i i I 1 1 t 3 F 6 -1 u i ❑ ❑ 0 'O O O D m 2 D m ZONE C m Z' c m WFEST S TREE O c 2 CL m � I CL U E O M A O rn rn � i O o o � —DI m ZONE C r_ < WELL # 18 N " SCALE IN FEET m 0 100 200 400 O o m ce w o LEGEND 0 ID / ZONE C AREAS OF 1ANIMAL FLOODING. O (NO SHADING) 0 rn / 1 10 25 99 ORIGINAL ISSUE BRH 10/99 CLK 10/99 AHS 10 99 < Z Fn NO. DATE ISSUE /REVISIONS DRAWN BY OC REVIEW OC CHECK w LLJ WELLHEAD PROTECTION PLAN FLOODPLAIN MAP FOR EDINA9801 RGURE ASO CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Wes„ #j$ DWSMA DATE 10 /zs /9s 8 u U C J J c R u 3 q a W z ca w 0 O) Q+ Z Q W W ti ¢ 3 06 L , s L CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA HENNEPIN COUNTY - MINNESOTA NO DATE ISSUE /REVISIONS WELLHEAD PROTECTION PLAN CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA DRAWN BY OC REVIEW OC CHECK PROD. N0. P �RE LAND USE IYI„A EDINA980t /V DATE Q 10/25/99 U, CL U 0 0 rn O N 0 O z J 7 / O a7 Q Z_ O w w_ w LL #18 N 0 750 1500 3000 I,,. 10/25/99 ORIGINAL ISSUE BRH 10/99 CLK 10/99 AHS 10/99 PROD. NO. A WELLHEAD PROTECTION PLAN WELLHEAD FROTECTM AREAS EDINA9801 �y -1� DATE �� CITY OF EDINA, {MINNESOTA PRAIRIE DU CHIEN- .JORDAN AQUIFER 10/25/99 `v DATE ISSUE /REVISIONS DRAWN BY QC REVIEW QC CHECK LEGEND 1 YEAR TIME OF TRAVEL/ CAPTURE ZONE 5 YEAR TIME OF TRAVEL/ CAPTURE ZONE YEAR TIME OF TRAVEL/ a10 CAPTURE ZONE I,,. 10/25/99 ORIGINAL ISSUE BRH 10/99 CLK 10/99 AHS 10/99 PROD. NO. A WELLHEAD PROTECTION PLAN WELLHEAD FROTECTM AREAS EDINA9801 �y -1� DATE �� CITY OF EDINA, {MINNESOTA PRAIRIE DU CHIEN- .JORDAN AQUIFER 10/25/99 `v DATE ISSUE /REVISIONS DRAWN BY QC REVIEW QC CHECK n cn co j u L u E v 0 rn rn 0 N O L a 0 7 0 w 0 00 rn / a z 0 w w h 0 750 1500 3000 LEGEND 1 YEAR TIME OF TRAVEL/ CAPTURE ZONE 5 YEAR TIME OF TRAVEL/ CAPTURE ZONE WELLHEAD PROTECTION PLAN YEAR TIME OF TRAVEL/ D10 CAPTURE ZONE WELLHEAD PROTECTION PLAN WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREAS PROJ. NO. EDINA980, �p�.' e F�I;E N0. DATE ISSUE /RE`ASIONS DRAWN 8Y QC RENEW QC CHECK CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA MOUNT SIMON- HINCKLEY AQUIFER °A'� 10/25/99 tl __ a.��,��i�il:: _-' °'� N 0 750 1500 3000 LEGEND CITY WELL LOCATION DRINKING WATER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT AREA (DWSMA) � WELLHEAD PROTECTION PLAN DWSMA's FOR WELLS SCREENED IN THE PROJ. NO. F 9RE EDINA9801 FM RE OF EDINA, MINNESOTA MOUNT SIMON- HINCKLEY AQUIFER DATE 1,3 10/25/99 NO. DATE ISSUE /REVISIONS DRAWN BY OC REVIEW OC CHECK 7 a N CD J d U E 0 m 0 rn rn I 0 CV 9 c� 0 rn J L� _z W O Co rn Q Z_ 0 W W H Cn Q / LL #18 N 0 750 1500 3000 LEGEND • CITY WELL LOCATION DRINKING WATER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT AREA (DWSMA) PROJ. NO. WELLI=IEAAD PROTECTION PLAN VULNERABLE DWSMA's FOR ED 9801 1194 E AdW ►� C" OF EDINA, MINNESOTA WS�B " AND #18 25/ N0. DATE ISSUE/RENSIONS DRAWN BY OC REVIEW OC �Cl E CK 10/25/99 a .n U U E 0 0 0 I 0 N 0 r vi x Q W L H1 EDINA free church WE G RIA AGATE TECHNpL GY WELL #11 DWSMA -9 PUBLIC LIBRARY WIN SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER RK WEL w a 76TH ST 1n w x o= w x N 0 250 500 1000 SCALE IN FEET LEGEND • HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE LOCATION • CITY WELL LOCATION DRINKING WATER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT AREA (DWSMA) 1 10/99 1 CLK 10 99 AHS 10/99 =i PROJ. NO. pC ��� WELLHEAD PROTECTION PLAN EDINA9801 FIGURE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA HAZARDOUS WASTE STIES DATE i5 DRAWN BY OC REVIEW OC CHECK 10/25/99 NIN free church 1§- HL EDINA f d.J i LAKE EDINA =CIR .M.i Ltj I D ESON lID� � w PUBLIC CRIES ARK CORN IA z LIBRARY 11 & ARK �l ' ARK HA 0 250 500 1000 lutheran YOR TOWN church of SENIOR R the master CITIZEN SCALE IN FEET CENTER o v LEGEND N ft RK vvwv ELL 8 SOLID WASTE SITE LOCATION N < E L , I i , e CITY WELL LOCATION if LA ED P RK N CEN NI L DRINKING WATER SUPPLY PLAZA MANAGEMENT AREA (DWSMA) L G DR w NORM NDALE > GOLF A K a COURSE 76TH ST 1n Y ct WELL # 1 y 1; 1 Q AZTEC INDUSTRIES,\ ^ WELL #11 DWSMA 1 10 25 99 ORIGINAL ISSUE BRH 10/9 CLK 10/99 AHS 10/99 PROJ. N0. AV WELLHEAD PROTECTION PLAN EDINA9801 FIGURE ��� O� E ®INA, MINNESOTA 1 SOLID WASTE SITES S DATE �@ NO. DATE ISSUE /REVISIONS DRAWN BY QC REVIEW OC CHECK 0/25/ 99 V Q N 7 u u U U) w N U V) O 00 0) Q Z_ F w W N N Q cn Ln a U E O 0 N 0 0 N 0 0 Li 0 a Q Z 0 w w Q / w N I 0 750 1500 3000 SCALE IN FEET LEGEND LEAKING UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK LOCATION C CITY WELL LOCATION DRINKING WATER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT AREA (DWSMA) 1234 LEAK SITE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER i lU /Y�/99 ORIGINAL ISSUE onn I 1.147 I �Ln I iU /44 I nro 1 . /44 1 PROD. NO. -_- - -- �` WELLHEAD PROTECTION PLAN LEAKING UNDERGROUND EDINA9801 U�?6 - -- - s� Cf Y OF EDINA, MINNESOTA STORAGE TANK SITES D 2s 9 �� N0. DATE ISSUE /REVISIONS DRAM BY QC REVIEIY QC CHECK / / Ln a- u E N N rn rn i 0 N I c� 0 w N 0 co Q z 0 w w wi AA5r&WELLHEA® PFRO I ECTION PLAN DATE ISSUE /REV1510NS DRAWN BV QC REVIEW K �+� �+' ®I' ° `� �INN�SOT QC CHEC N 0 750 1500 3000 SCALE IN FEET LEGEND • SPILL SITE LOCATION • CITY WELL LOCATION DRINKING WATER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT AREA (DWSMA) 1234 SPILL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER SPILL SITES PROD. N0. FHB RE EDINA9801 `oeTVr� DATE 10/25/99 Q z 0 Q is s ' CEMETARY -- n � f z � ` e WEB 1 10 25 99 ORIGINAL ISSUE NO. DATE ISSUE /REVISIONS ,n -:01� �� ♦���� �C' ♦ ��\ 11 . �i►1� ! �■ tom. �..■ ■ 01111- 11■ ■.1.1����� ■� �.■�� - 1111�� .., . ■II ■��. gas L,�� ARK _� �T111T11971:� r�■ ■ ■i ■� �Cr!! �_� #1 =■ dl,*A, =0 ■�f1��,� �j�� �� !! !gin ! 0 250 500 1000 SCALE IN FEET LEGEND HAZARDOUS WASTE p.� //� : l�ij�1 /11L'LII ■! ice' . VIOLATOR SITE LOCATION 11�: ■■■ will, �Ill�rn 111■ Ap CITY WELL LOCATION �► ���': ■ ■11111111■ X11 ■ ■ ■� � /11��1 ., ■ DRINKING NUMBER MND000293076 ., AZTEC USTRIES D07 493034 j APP /I I NOTE: THE HENNEPIN COUNTY PUBLIC Wsm } WELL #11 DWSMA SEVICES RELOCA EDATOLIMED NA MIINNESOTA. 1 MZI w BRH 10/99 CLK 10/99 AHS 10/99 "AV up WELLHEAD PROTECTION PLAN CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA HAZARDOUS WASTE VIOLATORS PROD. NO. EDINA9801 C FIWRE 20 DATE 10/25/99 DRAWN BY QC REVIEW QC CHECK a a U E O O rn rn 0 N d 0 w F- vi Q 0 co Q 0 w !n Q N 0 750 1500 3000 SCALE IN FEET LEGEND UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK SITE LOCATION ABOVEGROUND STORAGE TANK SITE LOCATION e CITY WELL LOCATION DRINKING WATER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT AREA (DWSMA) 1234 TANK IDENTIFICATION NUMBER Iowa OF WELLHEAD PROTECTION PLAN CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ABOVEGROUND AND UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK SrMS PROD. N0, EDINA9801 WR� 21 DATE SSUE /REVSIONS DRAI'M BY QC REMEW QC CHECK DATE 10/25/99 I a a V E 0 0 N 0 c� 0 J (n C.7 0 00 Q D W W n Q / I MN MNR 5290 .279528 a SMALL AND LARGE QUANTITY PROJ. NO. WELLHEAD PROTECTION PLAN EDIDA E F ��� CiTY OR EDINA, MINNESOTA �IAZARDOUS WASTE GeN�ATO� AN9 DATE 22 N0. DATE SSUE /REVISIONS DRAWN BY QC REVIEW QC CHECK HAZARDOUS WASTE TRANSPORTER SITES 10/25/99 0 750 1500 3000 SCALE IN FEET LEGEND SMALL QUANTITY HAZARDOUS WASTE GENERATOR LOCATION LARGE QUANTITY HAZARDOUS WASTE GENERATOR LOCATION HAZARDOUS WASTE TRANSPORTER LOCATION e CITY WELL LOCATION DRINKING WATER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT AREA (DWSMA) MND012345678 SITE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER SMALL AND LARGE QUANTITY PROJ. NO. WELLHEAD PROTECTION PLAN EDIDA E F ��� CiTY OR EDINA, MINNESOTA �IAZARDOUS WASTE GeN�ATO� AN9 DATE 22 N0. DATE SSUE /REVISIONS DRAWN BY QC REVIEW QC CHECK HAZARDOUS WASTE TRANSPORTER SITES 10/25/99 i i a V) Ln J a U ;_ 0 00 0 r` rn I n 0 w J c.D 0 / Q Z 0 W Li N Q ,RpnA' �e Y TEf 0 750 1500 3000 o s N TRY o� SCALE IN FEET g Q a Q a s EDINA�.°!.Y 0 � -z 3 a« � COUN'�RY C E3 _ °`� LEGEND WELL #3 w n ¢. ,o;o O uv,<,y @ p• R +� gyp,. �•, - 0 y Y GOLF COURSE LOCATION /� 0 y • CITY WELL LOCATION e 3 Aw 2• � �� Y Y 3Y � �sra � g � e f DRINKING WATER SUPPLY s @ � a 1L MANAGEMENT AREA (DWSMA) -c v rva � gg Y E .rA WC 3 xN yr s 9 n..ea � �v-• ,� 5 �S e� � LL a e = . a �.E ,�°" 1NLL #5 ' "".4•. 1w""ci+ a, $ < 3 ax° QII °S P q W LL #18 OLF C 0tE W L X14���� yD RI HARD WELL #11 I M\ � I 1 10 25 99 ORIGINAL ISSUE - BRH 10/99 CLK 10/99 AHS t0/99 PROD. NO. -, WELLHEAD PROTECTION PLAN ��� ������� EDINA9801 FIGURE N0. DATE SSUE REVSIONS DRAWN BY -� C" OF EDINA, MINNESOTA DATE n / _ OC REVIEW QC CHECK 10/25/99 23 Appendix A Wellhead Protection Area Delineations and Vulnerability Assessments Report .November 1998 City of Edina 3 P i Wellhead Protection Area Delineations and Vulnerability Assessments City of Edina, Minnesota SEH No. A- EDINA9401.00 November, 1998 ,l 1 t City of Edina Wellhead Protection Area Delineations and Vulnerability Assessments City of Edina, Minnesota SEH No. A- EDINA9401.00 November, 1998 i Allen H. Sunderman, P.G. i Project Manager Craig L z, P.G. Hydrogeologist Note: This document has been printed on recycled paper. Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. 3535 Vadnais Center Drive 200 SEH Center St. Paul, Minnesota 55110 (651) 490 -2000 b Public Water Supply Profile Wellhead Protection Manager The designated wellhead protection manager from the City of Edina is: Mr. Fran Hoffman, P.E. Public Works Director and City Engineer City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Public Water Supply The contact for the public water supply for the City of Edina is: Mr. Richard Pelinka Water Utility Superintendent City of Edina 5146 Eden Avenue Edina, Minnesota 55436 Consultant SEH has been retained by the City of Edina as their wellhead protection consultant. The SEH project manager for this project is: Mr. Allen H. Sunderman, P.G. Hydrogeologist Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. 3535 Vadnais Center Drive 200 SEH Center St. Paul, Minnesota 55110 Table of Contents Certification Page Public Water Supply Profile Table of Contents Page 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Purpose and Scope ................................................ 1 1.2 Background 1 1.2.1 Unique Well Numbers 1 1.2.2 Community Setting and Land Use ............................... 3 1.2.3 Precipitation ................................................ 3 1.2.4 Geologic Setting of the Community 3 1.2-4.1 Surficial and Underlying Geology 4 1.2-4.2 Aquifers and Groundwater Conditions .................... 5 1.2.4.3 Surface Water C aracteristics 6 1.2.5 Soils 1.2.6 Water Resources 7 ............................................ 7 2.0 WHPA and DWSMA Delineations ..................... _ 2.1 Prairie du Chien-Jordan 7 Aquifer ....................................... 2.1.1 Delineation Method 7 2.1.2 Data Elements 7 2.1.2.1 Time of Travel 8 2.1.2.2 Flow Boundaries 8 2.1.2.3 Daily Volume of Water Pumped 8 ........................ 2.1.2.4 Groundwater Flow Field 8 2.1.2.5 Aquifer Transmissivily 8 ................................ 2.1.2.6 Model Calibration 8 2.1.2.7 Model Accuracy and Uncertainty 9 ........................ 2.2 Mount Simon-Hinckley 9 Aquifer ........................................ 2.2.1 Delineation Method 10 .......................................... 2.2.2 Data Elements 10 ............................................. 2.2.2.1 Time of Travel 10 ..................................... 2.2.2.2 Flow Boundaries 10 ................................... 2.2.2.3 Daily Pumping of Water Pumped 10 ...................... 2.2.2.4 Groundwater Flow Field 11 2.2.2.5 Aquifer Transmissiviiy 11 ............................... 2.2.2.6 Model Calibration 11 .................................. 2.2.2.7 Model Accuracy and Uncertainty- 12 ....................... 12 J Wellhead Protection Area Delineations and Vulnerability Assessments A-EDINA9401.00 City of Edina, Minnesota Page i 3.0 Well and DWSMA Vulnerability Assessments ............................... 13 3.1 Prairie du Chien - Jordan Aquifer Wells . ............................... 14 3.1.1 Well 2 - Unique Number 208399 14 3.1.2 Well 3 - Unique Number 240630 ............................... 14 3.1.3 Well 4 - Unique Number 200561 ............................... 14 3.1.4 Well 5 - Unique Number 206377 ............................... 14 3.1.5 Well 6 - Unique Number 200564 ............................... 14 3.1.6 Well 7 - Unique Number 206474 ............................... 15 3.1.7 Well 8 - Unique Number 204884 ............................... 15 3.1.8 Well 11 - Unique Number 206183 .............................. 15 3.1.9 Well 13 - Unique Number 203613 .............................. 15 3. 1.10 Well 14 - Unique Number 200913 .............................. 15 3.1.11 Well 15 - Unique Number 207674 .............................. 15 3.1.12 Well 16 - Unique Number 203101 .............................. 16 3.1.13 Well 17 - Unique Number 200914 .............................. 16 3.1.14 Well 18 - Unique Number 200918 .............................. 16 3.1.15 Well 19 - Unique Number 505626 .............................. 16 3.2 Mount Simon - Hinckley Aquifer Wells ... ............................... 16 3.2.1 Well 9 - Unique Number 206588 ............................... 16 3.2.2 Well 10 - Unique Number 206184 .............................. 17 3.2.3 Well 12 - Unique Number 203614 .............................. 17 4.0 Summary ............................................................ 17 Wellhead Protection Area Delineations and Vulnerability Assessments A- EDINA9401.00 City of Edina, Minnesota Page ii M f' List of Figures Figure 1 - City Map and Municipal Well Locations 3 i Figure 2 - Wellhead Protection Areas (Prairie du Chien - Jordan Aquifer) Figure 3 - Wellhead Protection Areas (Mount Simon - Hinckley Aquifer) Figure 4 -. Pi Well 2 WHPA and DWSMA a Figure 5 - Well 3 WHPA and DWSMA Figure 6 - Well 4 WHPA and DWSMA Figure 7 - Well 5 WHPA and DWSMA '? Figure 8 - Well 6 WHPA and DWSMA Figure 9 - Well 7 WHPA and DWSMA Figure 10 - Well 8 WHPA and DWSMA Figure 11 - Well 11 WHPA and DWSMA Figure 12 - Well 13 WHPA and DWSMA Figure 13 - Well 14 WHPA and DWSMA Figure 14 - Well 15 WHPA and DWSMA Figure 15 - Well 16 WHPA and DWSMA Figure 16 - Well 17 WHPA and DWSMA Figure 17 - Well 18 WHPA and DWSMA Figure 18 - Well 19 WHPA and DWSMA Figure 19 - Groundwater Contour Map (Prairie du Chien - Jordan Aquifer) f Figure 20 - Well 9 WHPA and DWSMA I Figure 21 - Well 10 WHPA and DWSMA ►t Figure 22 - i Well 12 WHPA and DWSMA Figure 23 - Groundwater Contour Map (Mount Simon - Hinckley Aquifer) Wellhead Protection Area Delineations and Vulnerability Assessments A- EDINA9401.00 City of Edina, Minnesota Page iii Table 1 Well Characteristics Wellhead Protection Area Delineations and Vulnerability Assessments A- EDINA9401.00 City of Edina, Minnesota Page 2 Casing Year Static Const- Total Level Pump Well ruction Aquifer Depth Range Diam. Depth Capacity Unique No. Rebuilt Formations ft. ft. in. ft. GPM Well No. 2 1935 Prairie du 460 68 -87 16 260 1,000 208399 _ (1988) Chien - Jordan 3 1946 Prairie du 422 57 -81 12 265 900 240630 _(1979) Chien - Jordan 4 1950 Prairie du 500 82 16 265 650 200561 _ (1988) Chien - Jordan 5 1950 Prairie du 443 70 -81 16 257 900 206377 _ (1991) Chien - Jordan 6 1954 Prairie du 505 90 -114 16 315 1,100 200564 (1989) Chien - Jordan . 7 1955 Prairie du 547 112 -146 16 350 650 206474 (1983) Chien - Jordan 8 1953 Prairie du 472 49 -76 16 230 550 204884 _ (1990) Chien - Jordan 9 1957 Mt. Simon- 1130 215 -396 10 1,010 500 206588 (1985) Hinckley 10 1963 Mt. Simon- 1001 150 -252 16 882 600 206184 (1988) Hinckley 11 1963 Prairie du 402 22 16 321 1,000 206183 (1987) Chien - Jordan 12 1964 Mt. Simon- 1081 252 -397 16 955 900 203614 _(1990) Hinckley 13 1964 Prairie du 496 96 -134 16 429 900 203613 (1988) Chien - Jordan . 14 1964 Prairie du 418 38 -52 16 325 800 200913 (1992) Chien - Jordan 15 1967 Prairie du 405 83 -100 20 276 1,000 207674 (1989) Chien - Jordan 16 1967 Prairie du 382 70 -87 24 260 1,100 203101 _ (1990) Chien - Jordan 17 1970 Prairie du 461 57 -68 24 373 950 200914 Chien- Jordan 18 1973 Prairie du 446 61 -65 16 365 800 200918 (1977) Chien - Jordan 19 1989 Prairie du 524 152 16 440 1,000 505626 Chien - Jordan Wellhead Protection Area Delineations and Vulnerability Assessments A- EDINA9401.00 City of Edina, Minnesota Page 2 1.2.2 Community Setting and Land Use Edina is a fully developed community in Hennepin County, located immediately west of Minneapolis. The City's 1998 population is 47,029. The number of persons employed in Edina is approximately 49,130. The City contains several regional facilities including the Southdale Shopping Center, Fairview - Southdale Hospital, and a Hennepin County Library in addition to four public or private golf courses. These facilities, excluding the libraries, have water supplied by privately owned wells. Edina contains a mixture of housing types, commercial nodes, office parks, and light industrial areas. The City has historically emphasized the preservation of its significant natural features through its development regulations and state or federal mandate programs. As a result of these actions, as well as its proximity to the Minneapolis downtown area, the City experienced substantial growth after World War II and has continued to maintain a balanced mix of land uses. Single- family housing development served by small service- oriented commercial development occurred in the early 1920s. Regional retail development soon surrounded Southdale Shopping Center after its construction in 1952. Alternative housing types such as apartments, town homes, and condominiums aimed at a variety of age and income levels soon followed and are situated near retail and service areas in the community. Beginning in the 1960s, Edina proved to be attractive to major office and industrial developers. Pentagon Office Park development around the Southdale Mall, and office /service industries along the north side of I-494 all occurred following substantial residential and retail investment in the community. Future activity will be redevelopment projects since little vacant land remains. However, redevelopment activities are not anticipated to be major because of constant private reinvestment into existing developments. 1.2.3 Precipitation According to the 1974 Hennepin County Soil Survey, an annual average of 24.9 inches of total precipitation falls in Hennepin County. One year in ten will have less than 21.2 inches or more than 29.1 inches of precipitation. 1.2.4 Geologic Setting of the Community The geologic'features of the region have been summarized below from the Hennepin County Geologic Atlas. Wellhead Protection Area Delineations and Vulnerability Assessments A- EDINA9401.00 City of Edina, Minnesota Page 3 1.2.4.1 Surficial and Underlying Geology The surficial deposits' of the Edina area were deposited primarily by glacial ice and meltwater during the most recent glaciation. The glacial landscape has been somewhat altered by soil formation and erosion during the post- glacial periods. The majority of the glacial deposits are from the Des Moines Lobe and the Grantsburg Sublobe. The thickness of the surficial deposits range from less than 50 feet to 250 feet. There are five different surficial deposits in Edina. Three of the deposits are of glacial origin -a loamy till, a sandy till, and outwash deposits; and two post - glacial deposits, floodplain alluvium and organic deposits. The majority of the surficial deposits consist of the glacial deposits. The loamy till is mostly loam in texture, has a few beds and lenses of stratified sediment, and includes small areas of thick, fine, loamy colluvium. It is underlain by Superior Lobe stratified sediment or till. The sandy loam consists of loam to sandy loam, commonly capped by and interbedded with thin deposits of silty to gravelly stratified sediment. It is patchy over thick deposits of sand and gravel. It includes small areas of thick loamy to sandy colluvum. The outwash deposits are comprised of sand; loamy sand, and gravel overlain by less than four feet of loess. The floodplain alluvium is chiefly loam sand, sand, and gravelly sand interbedded with and overlain bythin beds of finer sediment and organic matter. Organic deposits consist of peat and organic -rich sediment with small bodies of open water usually present. However, there are areas where the organic deposits have been removed, filled, and/or drained. There are three types of uppermost bedrock present in the area beneath the Quaternary surficial deposits. The three types include, from youngest to oldest, the Platteville and Glenwood Formations, the St. Peter Sandstone,.and the Prairie du Chien Group. All three of these bedrock types are from the Ordovician period. The Platteville Formation is a fine- grained limestone containing thin shale partings near the top and base, underlain by the thin, green, sandy shale of the Glenwood Formation. These two units are typically classified as one formation 30 to 35 feet thick, and are found primarily in the northern and northeastern portions of the City. The approximately 160 feet thick, St. Peter Sandstone underlies the Platteville and Glenwood Formations. The upper half to two - thirds is a fine- to medium- grained, friable quartz sandstone, whereas the lower part contains multicolored beds of mudstone, siltstone, and shale with an interbedded, very coarse sandstone. Sand in the lower part of the formation are dark gray in color. The St. Peter Sandstone is the uppermost bedrock in the western half of Edina. Wellhead Protection Area Delineations and Vulnerability Assessments A- EDINA9401.00 City of Edina, Minnesota Page 4 The oldest bedrock of the three types, the Prairie du Chien Group, is the uppermost bedrock formation in the southern half of the City, and in a bedrock valley that traverses from the northwest to the southeast across the City. Generally, the Prairie du Chien Group is a dolostone that varies in thickness. The upper third to half of the formation is sandy with minor amounts of shale. The lower part is less sandy except within 10 to 15 feet of the base. The Prairie du Chien group is typically karst and may be rubbly. Depth to bedrock in Edina varies from less than 50 feet to 250 feet. A minor, northwest to southeast trending, bedrock valley exists across the area. 1.2.4.2 Aquifers and Groundwater Conditions There are four aquifers in the Edina area: the water -table system, the Prairie du Chien - Jordan, the Franconia - Ironton - Galesville, and the Mount Simon- Hinckley. The uppermost aquifer, the water -table system exists in many different types of geologic materials. Some of these may yield water to wells, such as sands and gravels, but others, such as till, do not. Due to the heterogeneous nature of the glacial deposits, the water -table system is highly variable in flow direction and velocity. Potential yield values in the Edina area range from 400 to 800 gallons per minute and groundwater flow direction is generally southeast toward the Minnesota River. The other three aquifers are bedrock aquifers. The uppermost bedrock aquifer, the Prairie du Chien - Jordan, is present throughout the City and is the most heavily used aquifer in Hennepin County. The Prairie du Chien Group is up to 150 feet thick in some areas and groundwater flow is controlled by fractures, joints, and solution cavities within the dolomite. The Jordan Sandstone consists of fairly uniform quartzose sandstone and is highly permeable. The groundwater flow through this sandstone is primarily intergranular. Since there is no confining unit between the Prairie du Chien Group and the Jordan Sandstone, they act as a single aquifer. Potential yield values range from 1000 to 2000 gallons per minute and groundwater flow direction is east and southeastward. The Franconia - Ironton- Galesville bedrock aquifer exists beneath the Prairie du Chien -Jordan aquifer. The St. Lawrence Formation, a + dolomitic shale and siltstone ranging in thickness from 30 to 75 feet, acts as the confining unit between the two aquifers. The Franconia-Ironton- Galesville is present beneath all of Edina and is comprised of three parts. The upper 105 to 190 feet consists of the Franconia Formation, a glauconitic sandstone with some shale and dolomite. The next 25 to 30 t feet consist of the Ironton Sandstone, and the lower 30 to 35 feet consist of the Galesville Sandstone. All three units are hydraulically connected. Wellhead Protection Area Delineations and Vulnerability Assessments A- EDINA9401.00 City of Edina, Minnesota Page 5 The groundwater flow direction in this aquifer is southeast, and the potential yield ranges from 400 to 800 gallons per minute. The deepest bedrock aquifer is the Mount Simon - Hinckley. It is located beneath the Eau Claire Formation - a 60 to 125 feet thick siltstone, shale, and silty sandstone, which is confining unit between the Mount Simon - Hinckley aquifer and the Franconia - Ironton - Galesville aquifer. The Mount Simon - Hinckley aquifer is the second major source of groundwater in the City. It consists of the Mount Simon Sandstone which ranges from 125 to 270 feet in thickness, and the Hinckley Sandstone which is absent in many localities. Where present, the Hinckley Sandstone is several tens of feet thick. In general, the Mount Simon - Hinckley is hydraulically isolated from the shallow groundwater systems and surface waters above it. Therefore, most of its recharge comes from leakage. The potential yield of this aquifer is greater than 1500 gallons per minute. The groundwater flow direction is likely northeast toward a cone of depression located in the City of Minneapolis. The overall quality of groundwater in Edina is good and quite similar for all the aquifers. The most common dissolved mineral constituents are calcium, magnesium, sodium, potassium, bicarbonate, sulfate, and chloride. Total dissolved solids typically range from 200 to 550 parts per million. According to the Geologic Atlas of Hennepin County, the sensitivity rating for the water -table system to pollution in the Edina area ranges from very high in the central portion to low in the northeastern portion. A sensitivity rating is a qualitative measure of the susceptibility of the aquifer to become contaminated from a release at the surface. A very high rating corresponds to outwash and other sandy deposits overlying the aquifer and the water table being less than 10 feet below the ground surface. A low rating corresponds to loamy till, clay loam till, silt, and clay being present over the aquifer and the water table existing greater than 10 feet below the ground surface. The sensitivity rating of the Prairie du Chien -Jordan aquifer in Edina range from very low in the northern part of the City to high to medium in the southeastern corner of the City. 1.2.4.3 Surface Water Characteristics There are seven lakes within Edina. The lakes include: Arrowhead Lake, Lake Cornelia, Lake Edina, Lake Harvey, Hawkes Lake, Indianhead Lake, and Mirror Lake. No water quality information was available for these water bodies. There are also two creeks in the City: Minnehaha Creek and Ninemile Creek. Minnehaha Creek is located in the northeastern part of Edina and the Ninemile Creek in the northwestern part. No water quality data was available for these two creeks. Wellhead Protection Area Delineations and Vulnerability Assessments A- EDINA9401.00 City of Edina, Minnesota Page 6 i 1.2.5 Soils The soils present in Edina were not classified in the 1974 Hennepin County Soil Survey. No other information concerning the soils was available. 1.2.6 Water Resources The existing water supply system for the City began in the 1920s and has taken approximately 70 years to construct. It is now considered to be generally complete except for maintenance and enhancement r. improvements. There are a total of 18 municipal wells that serve the City. Edina's water supply comes primarily from the Prairie du Chien - Jordan aquifer (15 wells). Three of the supply wells (City Well Numbers 9, 10, and 12) are screened in the Mount Simon - Hinckley aquifer. The 18 wells range from depths of 405 feet in the Prairie du Chien -Jordan to 1130 feet in the Mount Simon - Hinckley. Pumping design capacities range from 800 gallons per minute `(gpm) to 1500 gpm with a combined overall system design capacity of 15,300 gpm and 22 million gallons per day. 2.0 WHPA and DWSMA Delineations Wellhead Protection Areas and Drinking Water Supply Management Areas have been delineated for all 18 municipal wells in the City. The WHPAs for wells screened in the Prairie du Chien -Jordan aquifer are depicted in Figure 2. Wells screened in the Mount Simon - Hinckley aquifer are shown on Figure 3. Analytic element groundwater modeling programs were used to delineate the WHPAs and DWSMAs. The Multiple Layer Analytic Element Method ( MLAEM) was utilized for the Prairie du Chien -Jordan aquifer and the Capture Zone Analytic Element Method (CZAEM) was utilized for the Mount Simon - Hinckley aquifer. The following sections describe in detail the data elements used to create the well capture zones and provide an analyses of the results. 2.1 Prairie du Chien - Jordan Aquifer 2.1.1 Delineation Method { As mentioned above, computer modeling was used to delineate the WHPAs and the DWSMAs. Specifically, MLAEM was used for the Prairie du Chien -Jordan aquifer. A single layer was used to represent the groundwater conditions of the Prairie du Chien -Jordan aquifer. The Hennepin Conservation District (HCD) has completed a county-wide groundwater MLAEM model of this aquifer. In August 1995, the HCD provided SEH with a copy of the county model to use for the WHPA delineation for the City. SEH refined the county-wide model in an effort to isolate the groundwater flow field adjacent to and within Edina. A copy of the "call file" has been included as Appendix A. The specific Wellhead Protection Area Delineations and Vulnerability Assessments A- EDINA9401.00 City of Edina, Minnesota Page 7 data files used in the model have been provided in this report in electronic format on a 3.5 -inch disc. The WHPAs and DWSMAs for each well screened within the Prairie du Chien -Jordan aquifer have been provided as Figures 4 through 18. 2.1.2 Data Elements 2.1.2.1 Time of Travel Each WHPA was delineated for a maximum ten year travel time. The one -year and five -year capture zones have also been shown in the figures. 2.1.2.2 Flow Boundaries Most flow boundaries for this model were predetermined in the HCD county -wide model and were not changed significantly for the WHPA and DWSMA delineations within the City. The Mississippi and Minnesota Rivers act as local discharges for the Prairie du Chien -Jordan aquifer. A pumping test was conducted by the MDH on Well 3 on May 24 and 25, 1995 to determine the aquifer properties. Well 2 was utilized as an observation well for the test. A description of the test and the results were summarized in a MDH report dated May 24, 1995. Some problems were encountered during the test including strong well interference. Well 3 showed a much greater effect from the pumping of other wells than Well 2. As stated in the report, this is not thought to be caused by the proximity of other pumping wells because the wells are scattered fairly evenly throughout the nearby communities. It was most likely due to geologic differences within the aquifer formation. 2.1.2.3 Daily Volume of Water Pumped Table 2 is a summary of the annual water production for all of the municipal wells in Edina over a five year period. Average daily pumping rates and daily volumes were calculated from this data and used in the model. The highest recorded pumping rate over the last five years (1993 to 1997) was used for each well. 2.1.2.4 Groundwater Flow Field The groundwater flow field was predetermined in the HCD county -wide model. Groundwater in the Prairie du Chien -Jordan aquifer in Edina flows in a southeasterly direction. Figure 19 is a potentiometric contour map of the aquifer created from the MLAEM model. 2.1.2.5 Aquifer Transmissivity As discussed in Section 2.1.2.2, a pumping test was conducted by the MDH on Well 3. The results of this test are summarized in the May 24, 1995 MDH report. A transmissivity value of 110,000 gal/day /ft and storativity value of 0.00003 were chosen as being representative of the Prairie du Chien -Jordan aquifer properties in Edina. This value was Wellhead Protection Area Delineations and Vulnerability Assessments A- EDINA9401.00 City of Edina, Minnesota Page 8 calculated from the observation well (Well 2) composite data. As stated in the report, the overall test response is typical of a slightly leaky confined aquifer where there is an apparent increase in transmissivity with time. Using the equation: T =kb where: T = transmissivity k = conductivity b = aquifer thickness a conductivity value of 73.5 ft/day was calculated. This value was incorporated into the MLAEM model as discussed in the following section. 2.1.2.6 Model Calibration The HCD county -wide model was calibrated prior to SEH's revisions. Therefore, the Edina MLAEM model was not calibrated by SEH. The revisions to the HCD county -wide model are discussed in the following section. 2.1.2.7 Model Accuracy and Uncertainty The MLAEM model developed by the HCD was revised to more accurately define the groundwater flow conditions in Edina. The HCD changed many of the "resistance area elements" located away from Edina to "given area elements" to make the model manageable for the computer used by Edina. Well 3 and Well 19 were not included in the HCD county -wide model. These two wells and their pumping rates were incorporated into the Edina MLAEM model. The pumping rates of each municipal well were increased to reflect the highest annual pumping rates recorded over the previous five years. In the model, all the wells were assumed to be pumping at their maximum recorded rates. This resulted in a conservative estimate for the WHPAs and DWSMAs. A "nested doublet" (heterogeneity) was included in the model to reflect the hydraulic conductivity calculated from the pumping test. This doublet included all of Edina. A few of the municipal wells were located in the model adjacent to borders of large area elements. These large area elements were divided into smaller area elements to assist in creating a more accurate cone of depression around the nearby wells. Wellhead Protection Area Delineations and Vulnerability Assessments A- EDINA9401.00 City of Edina, Minnesota Page 9 The nested doublet and smaller area elements did not significantly change the groundwater flow pattern or head levels. There were five private wells located in Edina that were included in the HCD county -wide model. Their locations and pumping rates were left unchanged in the Edina MLAEM model. The pumping of one of these wells, identified as "Donaldsons" (Unique Number 206375), influences the WHPA and DWSMA of Well 5. In the event that this private production well is not pumping, the WHPA and DWSMA of Well 5 will change and include the capture zone of the private well. When compared to the Prairie du Chien -Jordan aquifer map included in the Hennepin County Geologic Atlas, it is apparent that the potentiometric map calculated from the Edina MLAEM model ranges from 30 to 70 feet lower than the Atlas. This may be due to the high pumping rates utilized in the model. 2.2 Mount Simon - Hinckley Aquifer 2.2.1 Delineation Method The Analytical Element Method was used to delineate the WHPAs and DWSMAs of the wells screened in the Mount Simon - Hinckley aquifer (Wells 9, 10, and 12). Specifically, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Capture Zone Analytic Element Method ( CZAEM) was utilized. A copy of the data file has been included as Appendix B. The WHPAs and DWSMAs for the three wells have been included as Figures 20, 21, and 22. 2.2.2 Data Elements 2.2.2.1 Time of Travel As in the Prairie du Chien -Jordan aquifer Edina MLAEM model, the maximum time of travel is ten years. In addition, each figure also depicts the one- and five -year capture zones. 2.2.2.2 Flow Boundaries It was assumed that the Mount Simon - Hinckley aquifer is completely confined and that no natural flow boundaries exist. However, it is evident from the Hennepin County Geologic Atlas that a large cone of depression exists in this aquifer within the City of Minneapolis. This cone of depression affects the groundwater flow of the aquifer in Edina. As shown on the geologic atlas map, groundwater flow direction in Edina, in the Mount Simon - Hinckley aquifer is northeastward toward the cone of depression. This cone of depression was replicated in the CZAEM model. An artificial pumping well and a negative rain rate that extracts groundwater from the aquifer were placed in the general vicinity of the cone of depression, outside the Edina city limits. The MDH conducted a pumping test on Well 10 on March 13 and 14, 1995 to determine the characteristics of the aquifer. The test and results Wellhead Protection Area Delineations and Vulnerability Assessments A- EDINA9401.00 City of Edina, Minnesota Page 10 i were summarized by the MDH in a report dated March 13, 1995. No well interference or flow boundaries were identified from the pumping test. 2.2.2.3 Daily Pumping of Water Pumped As discussed in Section 2.1.2.3, Table 2 is a summary of the annual pumping rates of each well from 1990 to 1994. The highest, average, annual pumping rate was used to calculate a daily pumping rate for each well. In the CZAEM model, all three wells were assumed to be pumping continuously at the calculated rate. The pumping rate used for the artificial well and the negative "raid' rate were based on trial- and - error. 2.2.2.4 Groundwater Flow Field As mentioned above, the groundwater flow direction of the Mount Simon - Hinckley aquifer was assumed northeastward toward the large cone of depression in Minneapolis. The hydraulic gradient was calculated by the model utilizing the input parameters. A potentiometric map created from the CZAEM model has been included as Figure 23. The overall results of the pumping test described in Section 2.2.2.2 showed that the test response is typical of a highly confined aquifer. 2.2.2.5 Aquifer Transmissivity As discussed in Section 2.2.2.2, a pumping test was completed by the MDH on Well 10. The results of the test are included in the March 1995 MDH report. As stated in the report, a transmissivity value of 16,400 gal /day /ft was chosen as being representative of the Mount Simon - Hinckley aquifer in Edina. A storage coefficient was not calculated. Using the equation: T =kb where: T = transmissivity k = conductivity b = aquifer thickness a conductivity value of 8.4 ft/day was calculated. This value was incorporated into the CZAEM model as a permeability value. Wellhead Protection Area Delineations and Vulnerability Assessments A- EDINA9401.00 City of Edina, Minnesota Page 11 Table 2 Average Annual Pumping Rates Well MN Unique ��„ +� �� V996') { „1 Max. Daily Pumping Rate No. Well No. 1993 1994 1995 1997 W /da 2 208399 Aga 588 389 730 670 1 3 240630 h£ ,R ;;p �} 4 2 6 4 4 200561 109 87 111 155 335{ 5_ 206377 4 8 10 ':$ 9 �3869� 6 200564_ 879 940 905 698 — — -- _ — — 0 7 206474 27 121 r 1'51 70 5' 8 204884 8 11 21 - 9 206588 254 291 309 356?t 8 0 2a�3' 10 - 206184 -- 262 468 567' 494 _ 2 11 206183 918 1011$ ; ;. 947 981 -- 753 -- 12 20361412; 729 194 450 343 1 13 203613 14 202 539 619 j�42g15' 14 203913 0 3 18 21 3 15 207674 7f 16 16 29 26 16 203101 � 557 386 463 619 8� 200914 109 139 F,r2f= 71 17 50 18 200918 11 15 184X , a 32 19 505626 10 12 27 30 2.2.2.6 Model Calibration ��/_I -3 / 1)) - �A/97 31/6 6 2�a ?Z 0<1 �,sS 1130 I S6a8 S6 333 e�f�ly /OZ 38 too// ry(OT The CZAEM model of the Mount Simon - Hinckley aquifer was calibrated using the Hennepin County Geologic Atlas potentiometric map. The negative rain rate and artificial well pumping rate used to simulate the cone of depression located in Minneapolis, were varied until the head levels in Edina were relatively consistent with the County Hydrogeologic Atlas. Head values across Edina range from 500 feet to 675 feet above mean sea level. 2.2.2.7 Model Accuracy and Uncertainty Many assumptions were made concerning the characteristics of the Mount Simon - Hinckley aquifer and the large cone depression located in Minneapolis. Static and reliable groundwater elevation data in the Mount Simon - Hinckley aquifer were not available. Therefore, the reference point used in the model was the three wells clustered in Champlin, Minnesota, in the northern portion of Hennepin County. A groundwater elevation of 850 feet above mean sea level was estimated from the Hennepin County Geologic Atlas. Wellhead Protection Area Delineations and Vulnerability Assessments A- EDINA9401.00 City of Edina, Minnesota Page 12 No porosity information was available for the aquifer, therefore, an aquifer porosity of 0.2 was used in the model. The default porosity value in CZAEM is 0.3. A porosity of 0.2 was used as a conservative value to increase the size of the capture zones. After reviewing the well logs of Wells 9, 10, and 12, an average aquifer thickness and the elevation of the base of the aquifer were calculated. An average aquifer thickness of 260 feet, and a base elevation of 171 feet below mean sea level were used in the model. 3.0 Well and DWSMA Vulnerability Assessments The 18 municipal wells of Edina are all located on City -owned property or are protected by easement. All of the wells are located a minimum of 40 feet from other structures excluding nearby treatment facilities. Table 3 presents the characteristics of the ownership and land uses of the well . ' sites. Table 3 Land Use Characteristics of Well Sites Well No. Acrea a Ownership Land use Closest Structure ft. Use of Closest Structure 2 .32 City Golf Course 250 Country Club 3 _ 1.0 City Open Space 50 Single - Family Residential _ 4 .86 City School 40 School ____5 .12 City Right -of -Way 200 Commercial 6 1.03 City Water Tower 150 School 7 1.4 City Park 160 Industrial 8 .20 City Open Space 90 Single - Family Residential 9_ .37 _ City Open Space 40 Single - Family Residential 10&11 N.A._ City Golf Course 10 Country Club 12 & 13 —5.2- City Park 150 Single - Family Residential __14 _ N.A. City Golf Course 775 Country Club 15 2.6 City Park 175 Single- Family Residential 16 6.8 City Park 375 Single - Family Residential 17 N.A. City Park 175 Single- Family Residential 18 6.2 City �Park 250 Multi - Family Residential 19 1.6 City School 175 Single-Family Residential Source: City of Edina aerial photographs. Wellhead Protection Area Delineations and Vulnerability Assessments A- EDINA9401.00 City of Edina, Minnesota Page 13 In the following sections, each well and its corresponding DWSMA has been assessed for its vulnerability. Vulnerability assessments have been based on information received from the MDH, the Hennepin County Geologic Atlas and well logs of the 18 municipal wells in Edina. A DWSMA has been classified as vulnerable if the geologic susceptibility rating is High Medium or High. Due to a tritium level of 1.5 TU recorded in Well .14, all City wells screened in the Prairie du Chien - Jordan aquifer are classified as vulnerable. 3.1' Prairie du Chien - Jordan Aquifer Wells 3.1.1 Well 2 - Unique Number 208399 The WHP score of Well 2 is 20; however, a non -THM VOC detection was recorded. No new information was obtained for assessing the well vulnerability of Well 2. According to the Hennepin County Geologic Atlas, the geologic susceptibility of the Prairie du Chien -Jordan aquifer within the delineated DWSMA ranges from Low to Low Medium and is therefore, non - vulnerable. 3.1.2 Well 3_- Unique Number 240630 The WHP score. of Well 3 is 65 points which exceeds the 45 point limit for non- vulnerble status. No new information was obtained. for assessing the well vulnerability of this well. According to the Hennepin County Geologic Atlas, the geologic susceptibility of the Prairie du Chien -Jordan aquifer within the delineated DWSMA ranges from Low to Medium and is therefore, non - vulnerable. 3.1.3 Well 4 - Unique Number 200561 The WHP score of Well 4 is 35 points. No new information was obtained for assessing the well vulnerability of this well. According to the Hennepin County Geologic Atlas, the geologic susceptibility of the Prairie du Chien -Jordan aquifer within the delineated DWSMA ranges from Very Low and Low and is therefore, non - vulnerable. 3.1.4 Well 5 - Unique Number 206377 The WHP score of Well 5 is 50 points which exceeds the 45 point limit for non - vulnerable status. No new information was obtained for assessing the well vulnerability of this well. According to the Hennepin County Geologic Atlas, the geologic susceptibility of the Prairie du Chien -Jordan aquifer within the delineated DWSMA ranges from Low to Medium and is therefore, non - vulnerable. 3.1.5 Well 6 - Unique Number 200564 The WHP score of Well 6 is 30 points. No new information was obtained for assessing the well vulnerability of this well. According to the Hennepin County Geologic Atlas, the geologic susceptibility of the Prairie du Chien -Jordan aquifer within the delineated DWSMA ranges from Very Low to Low and is therefore, non - vulnerable. Wellhead Protection Area Delineations and Vulnerability Assessments A- EDINA9401.00 City of Edina, Minnesota Page 14 3.1.6 Well 7 - Unique Number 206474 The WHP score of Well 7 is 15 points. No new information was obtained for assessing the well vulnerability of this well. According to the Hennepin County Geologic Atlas, the geologic susceptibility of the Prairie du Chien -Jordan aquifer within the delineated DWSMA is Very Low and is therefore, non - vulnerable. 3.1.7 Well 8 - Unique Number 204884 The WHP score of Well 8 is 20 points. No new information was obtained for assessing the well vulnerability of this well. According to the Hennepin County Geologic Atlas, the geologic susceptibility of the Prairie du Chien -Jordan aquifer within the delineated DWSMA is Low i and is therefore, non - vulnerable. 3.1.8 Well 11- Unique Number 206183 The WHP score of Well 11 is 40 points. No new information was obtained for assessing the well vulnerability of this well. According to the Hennepin County Geologic Atlas, the geologic susceptibility of the Prairie du Chien -Jordan aquifer within the delineated DWSMA ranges from Medium to High Medium. The DWSMA for Well 11 has been given a vulnerable status due to this susceptibility rating. 3.1.9 Well 13 - Unique Number 203613 The WHP score of Well 13 is 10 points. No new information was obtained for assessing the well vulnerability of this well. According to the Hennepin County Geologic Atlas, the geologic susceptibility of the Prairie du Chien -Jordan aquifer within the delineated DWSMA ranges from Very Low to Low and is therefore, non - vulnerable. 3.1.10 Well 14 - Unique Number 200913 The WHP score of Well 14 is 25 points. Tritium has been detected in the well at a concentration higher than 1 TU. No new information was obtained for assessing the well vulnerability of this well. According to the Hennepin County Geologic Atlas, the geologic susceptibility of the Prairie du Chien -Jordan aquifer within the delineated DWSMA ranges from Low Medium to Medium and is therefore, non - vulnerable. 3.1.11 Well 15 - Unique Number 207674 The WHP score of Well 15 is 15 points. No new information was obtained for assessing the well vulnerability of this well. According to the Hennepin County Geologic Atlas, the geologic susceptibility of the Prairie du Chien -Jordan aquifer within the delineated DWSMA ranges from Very Low to Low and is therefore, non - vulnerable. Wellhead Protection Area Delineations and Vulnerability Assessments A- EDINA9401.00 City of Edina, Minnesota Page 15 3.1.12 Well 16 - Unique Number 203101 The WHP score of Well 16 is 35 points. No new information was obtained for assessing the well vulnerability of this well. According to the Hennepin County Geologic Atlas, the geologic susceptibility of the Prairie du Chien -Jordan aquifer within the delineated DWSMA ranges from Low Medium in the one- to five -year portion of the capture zone to Medium and is therefore, non - vulnerable. 3.1.13 Well 17 - Unique Number 200914 The WHP score of Well 17 .is 25 points. No new information was obtained for assessing the well vulnerability of this well. According to the Hennepin County Geologic Atlas, the geologic susceptibility of the Prairie du Chien -Jordan aquifer within the delineated DWSMA ranges from Very Low to Medium in the one -year portion of the capture zone and is therefore, non - vulnerable. 3.1.14 Well 18 - Unique Number 200918 The WHP score of Well 18 is 15 points. In addition, the well's DNR geologic sensitivity rating is high. A high geologic sensitivity rating automatically gives the well a vulnerable status. No new information was obtained for assessing the well vulnerability of Well 18. According to the Hennepin County Geologic Atlas, the geologic susceptibility of the Prairie du Chien -Jordan aquifer within the delineated DWSMA is High Medium. Therefore, the DWSMA for Well 18 is also considered vulnerable. 3.1.15 Well 19 - Unique Number 505626 The WHP score of Well 19 is 10 points. No new information was obtained for assessing the well vulnerability of this well. According to the Hennepin County Geologic Atlas, the geologic susceptibility of the Prairie du Chien -Jordan aquifer within the delineated DWSMA is Low Medium and is therefore, non - vulnerable. 3.2 Mount Simon - Hinckley Aquifer Wells The Mount Simon - Hinckley aquifer is a confined aquifer in the vicinity of Edina, Minnesota. A minimum of 415 feet of bedrock formations overlie the Mount Simon Sandstone, the uppermost portion of the Mount Simon - Hinckley aquifer. Included in the overlying stratigraphy is the Eau Claire Formation, an 80 feet thick siltstone and shale that acts as the confining unit above the Mount Simon - Hinckley aquifer. Under these geologic conditions and with information gathered from the MDH it has been determined that the three, Edina municipal wells (Wells 9, 10, and 12) and their DWSMAs are non - vulnerable. 3.2.1 Well 9 - Unique Number 206588 Well 9 is classified as non - vulnerable. The WHP score for this well is 10 points which is below the 45 point limit for non - vulnerable status. From Wellhead Protection Area Delineations and Vulnerability Assessments A- EDINA9401.00 City of Edina, Minnesota Page 16 Carbon -14 age determination, the groundwater within the Mount Simon- e t Hinckley aquifer at Well 9 is ancient. No new information was obtained for assessing the well vulnerability of this well. The DWSMA for Well 9 is also considered non - vulnerable. 3.2.2 Well 10 - Unique Number 206184 Well 10 is classified as non - vulnerable. The WHP score for this well is 5 points which is below the 45 point limit for non - vulnerable status. From Carbon -14 age determination, the groundwater within the Mount Simon - Hinckley aquifer at Well 10 is ancient. No new information was obtained for assessing the well vulnerability of this well. The DWSMA for Well 10 is also considered non - vulnerable. 3.2.3 Well 12 - Unique Number 203614 Well 12 is classified as non - vulnerable. The WHP score of this well is -5 points which is below the 45 point limit for non - vulnerable status. From Carbon -14 age determination, the groundwater within the Mount Simon - Hinckley aquifer at Well 12 is ancient. No new information was obtained for assessing the well vulnerability of this well. The DWSMA for Well 12 is also considered non - vulnerable. 4.0 Summary SEH was retained by the City of Edina to delineate WHPAs and DWSMAs for the public water supply wells in the City. In addition, an assessment of the well and DWSMA vulnerabilities were conducted. SEH worked in cooperation with the HCD and the MDH during the completion of the delineations. The HCD provided a copy of the count - wide groundwater flow model of the Prairie du Chien -Jordan aquifer, and the MDH conducted two pumping tests to assist in determining the characteristics of the two separate aquifers. WHPAs and DWSMAs were delineated for the 18 municipal wells of the City of Edina. The delineations included the Prairie du Chien -Jordan aquifer and the Mount Simon - Hinckley aquifer. Fifteen (15) of the municipal wells are screened in the Prairie du Chien -Jordan aquifer and three are screened in the Mount Simon - Hinckley aquifer. The Multi -Layer Analytic Element Method was used to model the groundwater flow field and calculate the WHPAs in the Prairie du Chien - Jordan aquifer. SEH refined the HCD county-wide model specifically for the Edina region. The EPA Capture Zone Analytic Element Method was utilized to delineate the groundwater flow field of the Mount Simon - Hinckley aquifer. Wellhead Protection Area Delineations and Vulnerability Assessments A- EDINA9401.00 City of Edina, Minnesota Page 17 All 15 municipal wells screened in the Prairie du Chien -Jordan aquifer are classified as vulnerable due to a tritium detection of 1.5 TU in Well 14. From Carbon -14 age dating of groundwater in the Mount Simon - Hinckley aquifer it has been determined that the three wells screened in the Mount Simon - Hinckley are non - vulnerable. The DWSMAs for Well 11 and Well 18 have been classified as vulnerable. The other 16 DWSMAs have been classified as non - vulnerable. Wellhead Protection Area Delineations and Vulnerability Assessments A- EDINA9401.00 City of Edina, Minnesota Page 18 Figures a V) a U a r7 m I O 0 J li Z J O 01 Q Z_ J J I- 07 Q a LL #18 IV 0 750 1500 3000 LEGEND 1 YEAR TIME OF TRAVEL/ CAPTURE ZONE 5 YEAR TIME OF TRAVEL/ CAPTURE ZONE 10 YEAR TIME OF TRAVEL/ CAPTURE ZONE WELLHEAD PROTECTION WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREAS PROJ. N0. EDINA9401 yj G -�So C(TY OF EDINA PRAIRIE DU CHIEN-�QRDAN AWIEER OATS 10/20/98 23 N0. DATE SSUE /REVISIONS _ ORAVM B OC REV El'1 0 C CHECK 9 CL U) J d U i- a 0 0 00 rn I i 0 c� 0 �i J w Z_ w O �Y Q 7 w w J� Q AdW DATE - ISSUE /REVISIONS DRAWN BY QC REVIEW qC CHECK WELLHEAD PROTECTION CITY OF EDINA r, 0 750 1500 3000 LEGEND 1 YEAR TIME OF TRAVEL/ CAPTURE ZONE 5 YEAR TIME OF TRAVEL/ CAPTURE ZONE 10 YEAR TIME OF TRAVEL/ CAPTURE ZONE LL ROJ. NO. WELLHEAD pRO EC TM AREAS EPDINA9401 p MOUNT SIMON- HINCKLEY AOUIFEF 10izi98 J23 'WIN, err• ��! .�I1ov" !l'oloymEw �^ - , Rili - � t t �1jV a,, !!Q i!1 Ali m �w om p o k .,� a Ln a U •• I I .. `'tF ■m r I ■■ LJ IMP ■ III 1 N 1I - - -- - — --; 4 ^� W c 1 j - i > Q T Q w T ( w U V _ L=11 U 0 150 300 600 r ` I�I ii <i ML _ urC,h s st peters lutheron school �I , Icy c u c SOUTH SIDE HEBREW ISSUEISSUE /REVISIONS�DRAWN BY QC REVIEWBYY QC REVIEW f J� � �r iii '��T' '�■ N RDEN", SARK O Avjfw low OC CHECK ON M -- il r �� ■��� +IIRI� ■11 ■ ■Iilll�l■ o ■11_II� � e !���- - ■ ■ ■iQllll�ll l ■1�II� ■11 j�� !� IIJ ■, ICJ 11111111 SRI LEGEND 1 YEAR TIME OF TRAVEL/ CAPTURE ZONE 5 YEAR TIME OF TRAVEL/ CAPTURE ZONE 10 YEAR TIME OF TRAVEL/ CAPTURE ZONE DRINKING WATER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT AREA (DWSMA) J z 0 w a z L. w Li — a i N0. DATE r I ■■ LJ IMP ■ III 1 N 1I - - -- - — --; 4 ^� W c 1 j - i > Q T Q w T ( w U V _ L=11 U 0 150 300 600 r ` I�I ii <i ML _ urC,h s st peters lutheron school �I , Icy c u c SOUTH SIDE HEBREW ISSUEISSUE /REVISIONS�DRAWN BY QC REVIEWBYY QC REVIEW f J� � �r iii '��T' '�■ N RDEN", SARK O Avjfw low OC CHECK ON M -- il r �� ■��� +IIRI� ■11 ■ ■Iilll�l■ o ■11_II� � e !���- - ■ ■ ■iQllll�ll l ■1�II� ■11 j�� !� IIJ ■, ICJ 11111111 SRI LEGEND 1 YEAR TIME OF TRAVEL/ CAPTURE ZONE 5 YEAR TIME OF TRAVEL/ CAPTURE ZONE 10 YEAR TIME OF TRAVEL/ CAPTURE ZONE DRINKING WATER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT AREA (DWSMA) ! OVA WELL #3 Cn_Y OF EDINA WHPA AND DWSM A PROJ. N0. g EDINA9401 0� DATE ry 10/20/98 tE3 ml ISO ID 1 -113-1- 1 ATIO ME 1 ON SEEM IL'Al V,mii CL W LO a U co In 7 O J L� z c W O d Q Z_ n W W F-- Q ILD WAIRMINI MNEWUNIN I - r, I �MM s 0 VF7 4 4 oil .4 pirm I lot, 1 mam 0 FAsl Lai W Fill- n\u,h11 IN �•� =aka —� � i � w r 1/ ■ r i - ` r SCHOOL s DEN �-- I 4 r� cn _IDIN B L R HIGH ANDS -- O Y PAR►< - m i o r fo Sc c h E: I r L\a{ ; HIGHLAND SCHOOL W I � 8 AdW DRAWN BY EN QC REVIEW QC CHECK a zi - -- - -- MEMO MINION _ -- 8 s. 1 i 1 WELLHEAD PROTECTION CITY OF EDINA 4 E 'Jill • o r Sc o ch r( G � / nom; N 0 150 300 600 LEGEND 1 YEAR TIME OF TRAVEL/ CAPTURE ZONE 5 YEAR TIME OF TRAVEL/ CAPTURE ZONE 10 YEAR TIME OF TRAVEL/ CAPTURE ZONE DRINKING WATER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT AREA (DWSMA) EDINA WELL #7 WHPA AND DWSMA PROJ. N0. A EDINA9401 9 GATE 23 10/20/98 n U) a U J li z W ED / / Q z W / W F-- Vl Q a U) S CL U J W Z O W O Q _Z W W H r� d cn Ln 7 Q U J W _Z O W O Q Z W W ti V) Q CL V) a U 00 00 I 4n O (3� 3 J Z_ O W O / Q z 0 w / w Q / pp pp WIN 11 : A -� �1 ♦ fit �� ran ♦ ILI ■'L PAP `• 1 �� � z ICY , \ f f � � ' , � � � • `r�.. •� Cx �. y °i�` �"�i\9:1µaY_y r rf y , � , �'- ���,r.fif 4 1 . 1 tiJY rr 4y r � G • -- 1 ,� 4z a +� +�;�., ice, ��. F... �',. ■� Nki '�':� i J',��•,ryc.� •r Ills. x' � ' :y,I�pt a � _ ��.F F 1T •� I u• .�.�. � (4.� T � e r .S �F• i'� .§ f }" L � Kai cn Ln Co Q_ :3 U ;_ a OD cc 0 0 J L.� z 0 w 0 Q z s w w F- Q N (TO � � R'�-� AIT AN AIT M N N 0 150 300 600 D a D a � LEGEND � 0 1 YEAR TIME OF TRAVEL/ 2 C p CAPTURE ZONE �\ % (J�. 5 YEAR TIME OF TRAVEL/ _RLACHEN JFZ TERLACHE;` � �� E-�*'' �-- O C CAPTURE ZONE ���r - - - -- 10 YEAR TIME OF TRAVEL/ — �I CAPTURE ZONE COUNTRY 'r �'� 1I� COL i� -- \� DRINKING WATER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT AREA (DWSMA) w CLUB :, - I� CLUB - -� -- .--� HIGH— -7 HIGH- LANDS — AKE LANDS [ AKE HIGH ANDS II:,H �A D PARK c —7- -= N R o H ,, H o 9 0 IGINAL ISSUE BRH 10/98 CLK 10 98 AHS 10 98 - - PROJ. N0. �� WELLHEAD PROTECTION EDINA WELL #15 EDINA9401 14 CITY OF EDINA WHPA AND DWSMA ,0D ,98 23 N0. DATE ISSUE /RENSIONS DRAWN BY OC REVIEW QC CHECK (� ►w���lA� � I- I��II���S ,��\\��W� MINOR ��I ��I,�w/' � • i F�4�� me W 4,11116mjjWmmjjmmMj[Mmm7jhV;m "ZFlr IM Ll 3A ILL I Illy,14-flIm =07" i A .4 a CIO a U 00 00 i 0 U 0 J L� Z 0 w 0 Q z 0 w w Q .. I T, r v.. '" - -- - - -� 0 150 300 600 PUBLIC °UBLIC - LIBRARY LIBRARY Y I LEGEND H AZELT N R HAZE T N R�rt�l " 1 YEAR TIME OF TRAVEL/ l CAPTURE ZONE lutheran YORKTOWN lutheran YORKTUW�I r " -IOR o church of SENIOR church of IJ SFN I 5 YEAR TIME OF TRAVEL/ CAPTURE ZONE the master CITIZEN,) the master ;fr:,:,:1TIZEN ; TEI� /.' CEN TrR 10 YEAR TIME OF TRAVEL/ CAPTURE ZONE N1 N {� 1 N -- -= - -- 7771 ) DRINKING WATER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT AREA (DWSMA) ^ ARK - � S 1 3r eown• u7 UJ CEN NI L Y CEN NI L Y PLAZA PLAZA L K L K DR w DR LLJ Q K LST H < ARIK 76TH ST 76TH U� w x cn w x i cr- - w p ZMIMIRAE ISSUE 8RH 10/98 CLK 10/98 AHS 1-079 g0r F, ! WELLHEAD PROTECTION CITY OF EDINA _ EDINA ELL #�8 WHPA AND DWSNIA PROJ. NO. EDINA9401 17 23 D "� N0. DATE ISSUE /REVISIONS DRAWN 9Y DO REVIEW OC CHECK 10 /20/98 Liui Al Un colonial colonial CROSS TO W church _ROSSTO church N vy CD WN Wy OCi E E K V 1* L E Y CREEK PAR; GALLEY VALLE)' > SCHOOL SCHOOL 0 150 300 600 N I�c N' r creek vall creek vcll LEGEND C k' T/ I I R E K, CREE, F_ 1 YEAR TIME OF TRAVEL/ CAPTURE ZONE TIME OF TRAVEL/ EDINA EDINA 5 YEAR HIGH SCHOOL HIGH SCHOOL CAPTURE ZONE A 0 1 A 0 -I F_ 10 YEAR TIME OF TRAVEL/ CAPTURE ZONE Cn G s ��` I Z K, G V. DRINKING WATER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT AREA (DWSMA) VALLEY VIEW VALLEY VIEW:;:{ 0 'T 1` JR HIGH 0 jR HIGH fy N L st Pat— Y ~ a st pot- s b9jH (DY H s hol*c h o I I c h 0011 001 church -h jrrh LLLL I SRH I 10/9B -CL-K- 10/98 AHS 10/98 PROJ. NO. WELLHEAD PROTECTION L EDINA WELL #19 EDINA9401 18 .: SEN DATE: NO. DATE ISSUE/REVISIONS DRAWN BY QC REVIEW QC CHECK CITY OF EDINA WHPA AND DWSMA 10/20/98 23 a N Ln 7 CL U J Li Z w O d Q z 0 w w F- Q � �� r� . I ■i■ ' � a ,. ' • ■�■�■ ■III ■I � �� i� . I ■� � ��, a ' • ■■1�■■I�� ■I .. MIMI "I'll M 0 150 300 600 ��1�■F� ■ ■ ■ ■■ , n �� �■ ■■ ..� �Ilil�■■ � �� � ■� G�7■ V■ �i ■ ■ ■ ■■ , ■■ ■■ � � .. � '�IIti�i�IV � ■■ J■ !J■ �` LEGEND m I YEAR TIME OF TRAVEL/ CAPTURE ZONE ■ W �� 5 YEAR TIME OF CAPTURE ZONE 10 YEAR TIME OF TRAVEL/ CAPTURE ZONE DRINKING WATER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT AREA (DWSMA) . CI I■ ��s � � - I■ �1C - �ar���� ■��� ■OR!! !� ■�I ■� �■�■�R�c��i _ Ell SIDE AT PARK WAY " ■� 1 WELLHEAD PROTECTION CITY OF EDINA I ® . ,.: . . U E a Ln cc m 0 J W Z W O d o) Q Z W W I- Q r--1- r!< II.IF9 LA ED P A,R K -; G NORM NDALE t O q , I i i I rRK AWN__ L LA ED NORM A NDALE r__2� *,TL -�' G OL i IL _ i LEGEND 1 YEAR TIME OF N CAPTURE ZONE 0 150 300 600 LEGEND 1 YEAR TIME OF TRAVEL/ CAPTURE ZONE 5 YEAR TIME OF TRAVEL/ CAPTURE ZONE 10 YEAR TIME OF TRAVEL/ CAPTURE ZONE DRINKING WATER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT AREA (DWSMA) WHPA20J3 5RIGINAE S BRH 10/9B CLK - - 10/98 AHS 10 98 -- - -- WELLHEAD PROTECTION MINA WELL #m EDINA N0. p}� AdW DINA9401 � �1 N DATE ISSUE /REVISIONS DRAWN BY QC REVIEW QC CHECK CITY O EDIT A WHPA AND DWSMA 10/20/98 DATE 23 0- V) Ln co :3 L-L u E a- 0) Ln co 0) I �n 9 ft II GRAND VIEW PARK CEMETARY WA 0 VAN VALKENBURG p TIH TEK ff, APP LN Dill, Isiimrhm.- PNy AV DRAWN BY Sol X-! IM • MR. m ffil I QC REVIEW I QC CHECK A TRAVEL/ CAPTURE ZONE 5 YEAR TIME OF TRAVEL/ CAPTURE ZONE 10 YEAR TIME OF TRAVEL/ CAPTURE ZONE DRINKING WATER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT AREA (DWSMA) Li P tali j RD O Z 0 Li LLJ F- 10 0 u� NO. DA7 ft II GRAND VIEW PARK CEMETARY WA 0 VAN VALKENBURG p TIH TEK ff, APP LN Dill, Isiimrhm.- PNy AV DRAWN BY Sol X-! IM • MR. m ffil I QC REVIEW I QC CHECK A AVE APP LN WELLHEAD PROTECTION CITY OF EDINA Ld Ld DO V) N 0 250 500 1000 LEGEND 1 YEAR TIME OF TRAVEL/ CAPTURE ZONE 5 YEAR TIME OF TRAVEL/ CAPTURE ZONE 10 YEAR TIME OF TRAVEL/ CAPTURE ZONE DRINKING WATER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT AREA (DWSMA) P tali j RD AVE APP LN WELLHEAD PROTECTION CITY OF EDINA Ld Ld DO V) N 0 250 500 1000 LEGEND 1 YEAR TIME OF TRAVEL/ CAPTURE ZONE 5 YEAR TIME OF TRAVEL/ CAPTURE ZONE 10 YEAR TIME OF TRAVEL/ CAPTURE ZONE DRINKING WATER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT AREA (DWSMA) Lel m EDINA WELL #12 PROJ. NO. 22 EDINA9401 V DATE WHPA AND DWSMA 10�' /20/98 / 23 Appendix A MLAEM Call File m� I ret switch call lwin.dat call 1ref.dat call laquifer.dat call larelg.dat call larelr.dat call newarel.dat call newdblt.dat call eddblt2.dat call lline.dat call edwell3.dat call lwg92s_a.dat call lmapcur.dat call smallwin.dat call backon.dat call term.dat return coincide 1 switch end Edina3 Page 1 Appendix B CZAEM Data File I O f aquifer perm 8.43 thick 260 base -171 poro 0.2 ret pset mouse on ret reference -8600 100422 850 ret window -21255 -20568 17985 18672 ret map plot on curve 10987-12459 10987 3368 8339 3368 8339 15140 5788 15140 5788 8862 -105298862 -10529 -12982 10987 -12459 point -98606800 -88606800 -2472-2385 -1472-2385 3250-13688 4250-13688 ret well given 0 0 86275.335 Well 9 *Edina Well 9 5559 - 11347110042.415 Well 10 *Edina Well 10 -8862 8764151963.415 Well 12 *Edina Well 12 26869 -3260 7500001 *Artificial Well ret ret given rain 17000 24000 7000 - 1.2e -2 ret ret switch end f 6 i I Y l Appendix B Nine Mile Creek Watershed District 1998 Engineers Annual Report 1998 Prepared by BAR Nine Mile Creek Watershed District 1998 Annual Report Table of Contents Summary of Action During 1998 ............. ............................... . . . . 1 Present Condition of the Watershed . 6 _ Recommendations .......................... ............................... 7 Appendix A Groundwater Levels ............. ............................... A -1 Discussion ... .. ............................... A -1 Table— Summary of Groundwater Observations ...... A -2 Graphs — Record and Individual Wells .. ............................... A -3 Map— Generalized Groundwater Contours ..... ............................... A -16 Appendix B Lake Level Readings ........... ............................... B -1 Discussion .... ............................... B -1 Table— Summary of Lake Level Observations B -3 Graphs— Records of Individual Lakes ......... ............................... B -5 Appendix C Precipitation Gages ............. ............................... ... C -1 Discussion ....... ............ . ................... C -1 Table— Summary of Precipitation ... C -3 Graphs — Record of Precipitation Gages ..................... . ................ C -4 Appendix D Streamflow Measurement ..... . .... ............................... D -1 Discussion ... ............................... D -1 Table— Summary of Streamflow Measurements .. ............................... D -2 Appendix E 1998 Water Quality Monitoring Program ............................... E -1 209425.wpd i Summary of Action During 1998 E During 1998, the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District continued its program of monitoring stream and lake water quality and collecting and tabulating hydrologic data throughout the District. The District provided technical advisory information to various governmental agencies, organizations, and individuals. As engineering advisors to the Watershed District, Barr Engineering Co. aided the Board of Managers in the following items during 1998: • Attended all regular and special meetings of the Watershed District. • Conducted the Annual Field Trip of District on October 8, 1998. • Continued an ongoing program of monthly measurements of groundwater levels throughout 1 the District. A summary of the groundwater data and graphs of the groundwater elevations are presented in Appendix A • Continued an ongoing program of monthly measurement of surface elevations for lakes within the Watershed District. A summary of the data and graphs of the surface elevations are presented in Appendix B. • Serviced three precipitation gages maintained by the District. A discussion and graphs of the data are presented in Appendix C. • Collected and reviewed streamflow data for Nine Mile Creek. The streamflow monitoring program and data are summarized in Appendix D. • Analyzed the quality of water samples collected monthly from Nine Mile Creek as part of the Districts water quality monitoring program. The results of the program for 1998 are presented in Appendix E. This program was initiated in 1968 to provide the District and other governmental agencies a framework to observe the water quality of the stream, in accordance with the MPCA 2B water quality standards, as the watershed urbanizes. As i 209425.wpd 1 water quality issues are now of major concern, the program provides a check on the water management practices of the District. • Analyzed the aquatic biota samples collected at four stations along Nine Mile Creek. A summary of the inventory of aquatic biota is presented in Appendix E. This program was initiated in 1972 and supplements the stream water quality program by viewing the water quality of the creek in relation to the types of living organisms it will support. • Completed and distributed copies of the 1997 Annual Report of the District. • Inspected various construction projects and events throughout the District. • Investigated and answered numerous citizen inquiries. • Worked with the City of Bloomington staff in the permanent repair of washing that occurred adjacent to the Normandale Lake Outlet Structure resulting from the July, 1997 rainstorms. • Field observed the ongoing needs and requirements of the Lower Valley Restoration Project. Worked with the City of Bloomington in addressing the maintenance necessary throughout the project. • Prepared and completed bidding process for the Smetana Lake Basic Water Management Project. Made recommendation to the Board of Managers regarding awarding contract to Carl Bolander & Sons. Field observed construction activities. • Attended City of Bloomington Advisory Committee meeting to discuss recommendations as presented in the Engineer's Feasibility Report for the installation of an outlet for Bush Lake. Answered questions from the City, review agencies, and citizen's regarding the proposed project. Prepared plan amendment to the feasibility report to include dead tree removal and shoreline restoration. Met with City and MDNR to discuss objectives of the plan amendment. Submitted plan amendment to the MDNR for review and comment. • Worked with the,city of Edina on non - compliance of water quality requirements for Christ Presbyterian Church. Attended several meetings to discuss remedial actions to be taken by the permit applicant. 209425.wpd 2 d • Worked with the District's legal advisor on non - compliance issues of the permit conditions issued to Realife Cooperative Living Center in Eden Prairie. • Worked with the District's legal advisor with enforcement action taken against the Minnesota Department of Transportation regarding the replacement of inadequately sized culverts installed as part of the T.H. 169 —I-494 interchange improvements. • Reviewed Basic Water Management petition request submitted by the city of Eden Prairie for the Creek Corridor Management Plan. Met with City staff and District's legal advisor to discuss documentation submitted. • Met with Board of Managers, representatives of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and project developer of the Hopkins Business Center. The site is located along the eastern fringe of the former Hopkins landfill. • Met with city of Hopkins to discuss the proposed Headwaters Restoration and Stream Bank Maintenance and Stabilization project downstream of Excelsior Boulevard. • Met with Board of managers and representatives of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, and Minnesota Department of Transportation regarding the Use Attainability Analysis completed for Nine Mile Creek. • Assisted the Board of Managers in the implementation of the requirements of the 1991 Wetland Conservation Act. As the engineering advisors for the District, Barr Engineering Co. aided the Board of Managers on the following items within the City of Bloomington: • Reviewed a MDNR Work in Protected Waters Permit Application for the following project: — Redirection of Stormwater Runoff to Mount Curve Pond 209425.wpd 3 In 1998, the engineering advisors reviewed plans for the following projects within Bloomington for which the Board of Managers issued grading and land alteration permits: Addition to American Legion Post 550 Bloomington Days Inn Parking Lot Addition Bloomington Storm Sewer Maintenance Project Bloomington Convenience Storm Bloomington Baptist Church Utility Improvements Bush Lake 70 Meter Ski Jump Donaldson Companies Parking Expansion Friendship Village Expansion Golf Driving Range at Hyland Hills Ski Area PCL Office Building Expansion Realife Cooperative of Bloomington Select Inn Renovation As the engineering advisors for the District, Barr Engineering Co. aided the Board of Managers on the following items within the City of Eden Prairie: • Reviewed a MDNR Work in Protected Waters Permit Application for the following project: — Realife Cooperative Living Center In 1998, the engineering advisors reviewed plans for the following projects within Eden Prairie for which the Board of Managers issued grading and land alteration permits: Ancor Office Building Crosstown Office Plaza Crosstown Circle Center Development Crosstown Corporate Center Crosstown Circle Center Hartford Place Area 2-- Permit Extension International School of Minnesota Gymnasium Addition Liberty Property Trust Parking Lot Expansion Mount Properties Office Building Regal Cinema River Knoll Office Building 209426.wpd 4 1. In 1998 the engineering advisors for the District, Barr Engineering Company, aided the Board of Managers on the following items in Edina: Reviewed a MDNR Water Appropriation Permit for the following project: — Film Tech Corporation In 1998, the engineering advisors reviewed plans for the following projects within Edina for which the Board of Managers issued grading and land alteration permits: Centennial Lakes Phase II Christ Presbyterian Church t Douglas Corporation Office/Warehouse Drainage Improvements on Interlachen Country Club Guardian Savings and Loan Oaks Lincoln Townhomes Parklawn Medical Center b Pond Maintenance at the Entryway to Braemer Golf Course Roadway Improvements — Southwest and Southeast Loops of T.H. 169 and T.H. 62 Room and Board Addition Sanitary Sewer Improvements — Ashcroft Lane T.H. 62 Improvements East of Tracy Avenue F West 78th Street Improvements from Cahill Road to Gleason Road As engineering advisors for the District Barr Engineering Company aided the Board of Managers on the following item in Minnetonka: • Reviewed a MDNR Work in Protected Waters Permit Application for the following project: Installation of an outlet from Minnetonka Ponding Basin 531 to Shady Oak Lake i In 1998, the engineering advisors reviewed plans for the following projects within Minnetonka for which the Board of Managers issued grading and land alteration permits: City of Minnetonka Street Rehabilitation ! Clearwater Drive Street Improvements HOV Lane Construction Modern Merchandising Office Building Addition and Parking Expansion ° Opus Corporate Center 209425.wpd 5 3 In 1998, the engineering advisors reviewed plans for the following projects within Hopkins for which the Board of Managers issued grading and land alteration permits: Alley Improvements Benshoff/Brauer Office Building Chapel View Care Center Addition Filling on Lots 3 and 20, Block 93, West Minneapolis Second Division Hopkins Valvoline Instant Oil Change Steiner Development Storm Sewer Improvements Super Valu Warehouse Addition Present Condition of the Watershed The Watershed District is extensively urbanized. "Urban development" is defined by the District as land designed for its final use, such as land platted as residential tracts, development for industry or commerce, or reserved for park or open space. This designation does not imply that development is complete or even begun. Surveys of the percentage of land in the District that is urbanized have been made periodically since the District's first overall plan was prepared in 1960. Through the 1960s, the surveys were made during alternate years. The surveys now take place every four years. A map of the generalized pattern of land development in the District was produced along with the 1972 survey. The following table lists the years of surveys and the percentages of urbanization in those years. 209425.wpd 6 Table 1. Watershed District Urbanization Year Percent of Land Developed 1960 33% 1962 40% 1964 55% 1966 50% 1968 66% 1972 81% 1976 85% 1980 90% 1984 94% 1988 96% 1992 97% 1996 98 %, Recommendations 1. The Watershed District should implement the new, revised and existing programs as outlined and presented in the Districes'Second Generation 509 Plan. 4 2. The Watershed District should continue to collect hydrologic data. This includes the stream gaging of Nine Mile (at Normandale Lake) and continued monthly observations of the groundwater piezometers and the lake gages located throughout the District. i The District should consider installing additional groundwater piezometers to replace those lost or damaged because of construction and installation of a new stream gaging station at Normandale Lake. 3. The Watershed District should continue its creek and lake water quality monitoring program which was initiated in 1968. This program has been of great value in providing data that relates the impacts of urbanization to the quality of the streams and lakes in the District. Of particular concern are suspended solids and turbidity resulting from construction within the watershed. This information should continue to be compiled, evaluated, and forwarded to the various governmental agencies which have expressed concern regarding the water quality of the District. M426.wpd 7 4. The District's efforts to control erosion from land alteration should continue. The current District management practices are the most effective in the protection of the water quality of the District's streams and lakes. 5. The District should continue to review development plans and inspect construction projects to ensure that proper erosion control measures are being employed at all times. 6. The District should continue with the storm event sampling and the Use Attainability Analysis for the streams and lakes throughout the District. The modeling will also identify areas where potential water quality improvements can be made. 7. The District should continue working with the cities of Bloomington and Eden Prairie in addressing high -water levels in the Bush Lake - Anderson Lake system. 209425.wpd 8 Appendix A Groundwater Levels Discussion The Nine Mile Creek Watershed District's groundwater monitoring program began in 1962 when 18 groundwater observation wells were installed at various locations throughout the District. The following year, the program was augmented by the installation of 20 additional wells. In 1967, six wells were replaced and five new wells were installed. During 1973, seven wells were replaced and two new wells were installed. During 1974, two new wells were installed by the City of Minnetonka to monitor the groundwater changes during the Wing Lake sewer construction. These wells have been included in the regular monitoring program. During 1975, four new wells were installed near Bryant Lake. Wells 16 and 25 were lost in July of 1994. Eleven wells were in operation during all of 1998. Well 1 has been plugged since March, 1997. Well 49 was blocked by construction for the last 8 months of 1998. Well 49 has been recovered for the 1999 season. The table following this discussion summarizes the groundwater level observations. Column 1 lists the net change in water level from January 1998 through January 1999. During this period, groundwater elevations dropped in eight wells, increased in three wells. The average groundwater change was a decrease of 0.5 feet. Column 2 lists the maximum fluctuation of each well from January 1998 through January 1999. The range of fluctuations varied from 0.7 feet in Well 35 to 3.7 feet in Well 42. The average fluctuation during this period was 1.8 feet. Column 3 lists the maximum fluctuation during the entire period of record. The average maximum fluctuation of record is 8.8 feet for the 12 wells. Column 4 and Column 5, respectively, 1 list the highest and lowest readings of the water table at each well and the date of occurrence. A a record high level was recorded in Well 23 1998. Graphs of the groundwater levels and soil boring logs follow the summary table. A generalized groundwater contour map is included at the end of this appendix. This map also shows the location of all groundwater observation wells maintained by the District. 209425.wpd A_1 Table- Summary of Groundwater Observations Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Column 1: Net Change in Level (feet)- January 1998 through January 1999 Column 2: Maximum Fluctuation (feet) - January 1998 through January 1999 Column 3: Maximum Fluctuation During Period of Record (feet) Column 4: Highest Recorded Level (Date) Column 5: Lowest Recorded Level (Date) 'Well was dry from 6/88 to 4/89, 10/89 to 12/89, and blocked 4/98 Well 34 destroyed after May, 1992 Well 26 repaired after May, 1992 Well 25 destroyed after April 1994 Wells 16 and 25 destroyed after June 1994 Well 1 plugged March, 1997 209425.wpd A -2 Column Column Column Column Column Well No. 1 2 3 4 5 7 -0.5 1.9 15.5 872.7 (06/06/67) 857.2 (10/17/89) 22 0.2 .9 10.4 802.3 (05/03/66) 791.9 (05/31/90) 23 -0.3 1.2 6.8 806.6 (5/18/98) 798.6 (03/25/76) 26 -0.9 .8 9.0 822.4 (06/02165) 813.4 (12/01/64) 35 -0.4 .7 12.1 846.2 (05/24/69) 834.1 (01/01/64) 37 0.7 1.1 11.7 825.6 (07/03167) 813.9 (05/02/90) 39 -0.9 3.8 5.4 814.0 (07/08/93) 805.3 (07/28/88) 41 -0.7 1.5 10.2 881.2 (08/12/87) 871.0 (08/10/77) 42 -2.0 3.7 8.8 882.1 (08/68) 873.3 (03/06/90) 45 -1.2 3.0 6.3 813.0 (03/24/86) 806.7 (07/28/88) 49' - 1.2 4.5 853.2 (12/13/95) 848.7 (09/17/96) 52 0_3 1_9 4_7 854.2 (04/22/83) 849.1 (09/15/94) Avg. -0.5 1.8 8.8 'Well was dry from 6/88 to 4/89, 10/89 to 12/89, and blocked 4/98 Well 34 destroyed after May, 1992 Well 26 repaired after May, 1992 Well 25 destroyed after April 1994 Wells 16 and 25 destroyed after June 1994 Well 1 plugged March, 1997 209425.wpd A -2 1 1996 v 1996 1997 1998 1996 1997 1998 1996 1997 1998 1996 1997 1998 mw Sri MA -- _ ■MAI FiMMLI AMM TWA l►wm Mal v 1996 1997 1998 =C M.. emu• � u� 1996 1997 1998 ���� •�����A�� � �� ��I�����n V �� ���'�e������� � �� �� ►����I ���C� ���I ���������� � ��V����V�_1 �Ii����.���� �._ ���V���� /���� I��II �� ��V �V� V��l�������� `►�; � � �� V � V � V �� ���������� �� � I���������������������� ��� I •. O / . /. tip° \-Po / . Q .4b Ile 4 00 10 40 /�\ ^ o /d o i� d ey / 0,1,• a e/ .� o 9006 010 27 + , 23 o \ A ` ♦ 1 4 • 26 15�1 o � •+ 0 4 i �` • i.. 44 '• 2 (5 �,• o .; 20 •• • 5 16 4• k / e o ' � s 3 JA \ /J • • O o ` 38 o . 1` 7 •• ` • 4�� � ,� � � / o �` ♦ +fie o �`� Ty NINE MILE CREEK LOCATION OF WATERSHED DISTRICT - HYDRO LOGiCAL STATIONS HEN NEPIN COUNTY GENERALIZED PREG'i'ITArION GAGE SCALE, STREAM GAGE $ GROUNDWATER CONTOURS •. GROUGWATER O9S. WELL • LAKE GAGE n -16 q Appendix B Lake Level Readings Discussion Y�I The lake level recording program initiated by the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District in 1960 was comprised of the three Anderson Lakes and Bush Lake. The program was enlarged in 1963 to include Hawkes Lake, Mirror Lake, and Shady Oak Lake. The following year the program was r; again expanded to monitor a total of 26 lakes in the Watershed District. Measurements of Minnetoga and of Girard Pond were discontinued in 1964 because extensive weed growth in the summer made periodic readings impractical. In 1973, Lakes Minnetoga and Smetana were added to the program. The levels of the 26 lakes monitored in 1998 were measured using an engineering level from permanent structures along the shore. Lake level readings are taken monthly, usually at the same i} time the groundwater levels are measured. The table following this discussion summarizes the lake level observations. Column 1 of the table lists the net fluctuation of each lake from January 1998 through January 1999. During this . period, levels dropped in 11 of the District's lakes and rose in 12 of the lakes and stayed the same in 3 lakes. There was an average change of -0.1 feet in water level for all the lakes during 1998. The maximum fluctuation of each lake from January 1998 through January 1999 is recorded in Column 2. Seventeen of the lakes monitored the entire year fluctuated one foot or more during this period with an average fluctuation of 1.1 feet. Column 3 lists the maximum fluctuation of each lake during the period of record. The average maximum lake level fluctuation for all of the lakes during the period of record has been calculated using the record high water elevations that were obtainable during July 1987 and, for the seven lakes where this information was not obtained, the previous maximum fluctuation was used. The average maximum lake level fluctuation during the period of record is 8.1 feet. Bush Lake in April set a new record high. No new record lows were set. Column 4 lists the highest and Column 5 lists the lowest recorded water levels on the lakes during the period of record along with their corresponding dates of occurrence. Lake levels are influenced by groundwater conditions, local precipitation, size of the drainage area, land surface area, outlet 209425.wpd B -1 a 9 9 9 91 91 91 9( N 9( M O 0 91 c� 3 N N 10 m n 8� 0 N n c 8S a i ii PROJECT: Nine Mile Creek Watershed District LOCATION: Mirror Lake Previous Record High 912.1 07/24/87 Previous Record Low 901.8 01/14/77 M I M C too, LAKE GAGE NO. 8 r M A M J J A J U N U J h M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J 1996 1997 1998 B -8 89 ' Sf 89 88 88 88 88 8& 88• N N a n r 88• T QI 88, N O g 88 E V UU( h N 10 n 87< 0 .� O N M 1 87f PROJECT: Nine Mile Creek Watershed District LOCATION: Hawkes Lake Previous Record High 892.2 07/24/87 Previous Record Low 881.6 01/14/77 LAKE GAGE NO. 9 U � � I1 � -• •• .. . v i. v 0 r m rr m J J A J U N U J h M A M J J A S 0 N D J 1996 1997 1998 B -9 1996 1 1997 1998 ■m ■m ■m ■m ■m ■m ■m ■v ■m ■m ■m am am am am am am am am am am am am am im im 1001 NINE 1111 lm lm ii 1100 1m 1. 1� 1� 1101 1m lm 1111 1101 1111 lm all I.� II■ I■ &\ a1 NOW SIR m all m all m Mal MEN all all MEN m M all m mi 1996 1997 1998 PROJECT: Nine Mile Creek LAKE GAGE NO. 14 Watershed District LOCATION: Valley View Pond (E. Garrison) Previous Record High 865.4 07/24/87 Previous Record Low 862.1 01/31/66 8 8 8 8 8 8 864 863 862 m n 861 N 860 O 0 859 B -14 1996 1997 1998 9 m 0 0 Cn 0 N M O O O O� t V fV r a to m n 0 0 n N W) N O U PROJECT: Nine Mile Creek Watershed District LOCATION: Penn Lake Previous Record High 816.6 07/24/87 Previous Record Low 803.2 1/31/89 LAKE GAGE NO. 16 V r m m m U U H J U N U J h M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J 1996 1 1997 1 1998 B -16 1996 1997 1998 OL 82 82 82 82 82 81 81 81 a 0 81 81 N n 0 0 81 N 81 toI 0 t 0 812 0 N M 811 i IL PROJECT: Nine Mile Creek LAKE GAGE NO. 19 Watershed District LOCATION: Pond — 84th and Johnson (Wanda Miller) Previous Recor High 826.7 07/24/87 Previous Record Low 816.7 02/09/82 .. •• ... � w-. v ii v u r m A M J J A J U N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J 1996 7 1997 1 1998 B-18 s��o�w�� an ���� omeemmamvomm =mo mommommm� l MM =MM1MMaMM M=�o�ae■� == 02 oee MME =i e■EeMMEMMUMMa�AEMOMMOMMMMMMMMM mmmm=2 =02mmoomommommom �����ese■a�� ��e■��MMMMMMM MME ee•��Ne��� M aoMoMMMMIE■ M=MM =ee.�������������� MOSM aar.���a��e■�o�����=jL1 e•e■ ��������►�� aaM ®eve WIM&d=■ �•re = = =e■Mmm ee�aEM 0=0�m��Imm ��=������������ C A���a��e vie■ ���a�a�a�� ��e■���������� �w�a�e■ E MO OREe■�e��O�e���������ele■ei�e■� ��er��o�o�� ������������ MEMEM— an MMMMMMIIMMMW�=� ®M MOMMUMM��������a� on MEmm MMMMMMMMMM ®� wmmmmmwo= 0 mmmmmmmmommmm == .. •• ... � w-. v ii v u r m A M J J A J U N D J F M A M J J A S O N D J 1996 7 1997 1 1998 B-18 1996 1997 1998 PROJECT: Nine Mile Creek LAKE GAGE NO. 21 Watershed District LOCATION: Bryant Lake Previous Record High 854.8 07/24/87 Previous Record Low 849.3 01/14/77 8 8 8 8 8 85" 852 85' 85C v 0 o 84q rn m m N 848 n 0 00 847 c� N 846 B -i0 PROJECT: Nine Mile Creek Watershed District LOCATION: Arrowhead Lake Previous Record High 878.6 07/24/87 Previous Record Low 871.4 02/18/81 88( 87f 87E 877 854 87E 875 874 873 m m 0 872 m m m 871 N M O g 870 2 N 868 LAKE GAGE NO. 22 B -21 FAk,MM!R%l mfto4vAkh: 1996 1997 1998 -�Wwv 1996 1997 90E 90E 904 903 902 901 900 899 898 a n N 897 N 896 n o °0 895 N 894 1. N co h 893 0 N N 892 PROJECT: Nine Mile Creek LAKE GAGE NO. 27 Watershed District LOCATION: Minnetoga Lake (Mud Lake) Previous Record High 899.1 07/24/87 Previous Record Low 894.1 01/29/90 r m H M J J H J V N U ,l F M A M J J A S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D J 1996 1997 1998 1 B -25 4 i n a ri 0 m rn rn i N n 0 0 2 0 ca o f N n N ID 00 j o 0 N n g F U PROJECT: Nine Mile Creek Watershed District LOCATION: Lake Smetana Previous Record High 840.6 07/24/87 Previous Record Low 830.2 11/08/76 LAKE GAGE NO. 28 • - .. v 'v v V r m r M J J H .Z� U N U J h M A M J J A S O N D 1996 1997 1998 B -26 If 1 Appendix C Precipitation Gages Discussion s Three precipitation gages were installed in the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District in 1964. The p District has kept continuous records of the gages since their installation. One gage is located in i Bloomington at the Bloomington Public Works Department building. In November, 1989, the Bloomington gage was relocated to the new Bloomington Public Works Building at West 98th i Street and James Avenue. Another gage is located in Hopkins at the Hopkins Public Work Department Building. The third gage is located at the Minnesota Department of Transportation Public Works Building in Eden Prairie. Gage locations are shown on the map of generalized groundwater contours in Appendix A. The Hopkins gage was down from June — September while it was being repaired and moved from the Hennepin County Maintenance site to the new location. i Graphs at the end of this appendix show the daily precipitation recorded during 1998 at the Bloomington, Eden Prairie, and Hopkins gage, and the U.S. Weather Bureau gage located at the Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport. Total precipitation for each month of the year at each gage and the monthly - yearly mean precipitation from 1891 through 1998 at the U.S. Weather Bureau gage are also shown on the graphs. Differences in precipitation between the various gages are recorded occasionally. An example of this variation in 1998 occurred on June 26, 1998 also, the greatest 24 -hour precipitation event during 1998. On this date, the U.S. Weather Bureau gage, the Bloomington gage and the Eden Prairie gage recorded 2.54, 2.4, and 1.06 inches of precipitation, respectively. The Hopkins gage was inoperative during June. The average monthly precipitation in the watershed for 1998 (Theissen average) was lower than i the mean monthly precipitation of 1891 through 1998 at the U.S. Weather Bureau gage in Feb., July, Sept., Oct., Nov. and Dec. and higher in the other six months. The average total precipitation over the watershed in 1997 was 30.6 inches. The mean annual precipitation of 1965 through 1998 in the watershed is 27.1 inches. This is 1.2 inches lower than the mean annual precipitation of 1891 through 1997 at the U.S. Weather Bureau gage and 1.6 inches lower than the mean annual precipitation for 1965 through 1998 at the U.S. Weather Bureau gage. The table on the following page summarizes average yearly precipitation over the watershed from 1965 to present. 209425.wpd C -1 Table- Summary of Precipitation Column 1: Calendar Year Column 2: Average yearly Precipitation Over the Watershed (Theissen Average) Column 3: Difference between the average yearly precipitation over the watershed and the Minneapolis -St. Paul U.S. Weather Bureau Mean Annual Precipitation from 1891 to 1998 of 28.3 inches. 1 2 3 1965 39.1 1966 23.7 1967 23.8 1968 37.7 1969 18.3 1970 30.7 1971 29.3 1972 24.1 1973 22.5 1974 21.1 1975 33.8 1976 14.5 1977 33.1 1978 28.2 1979 28.9 1980 18.2 1981 26.4 1982 23.6 1983 30.2 1984 32.5 1985 27.1 1986 31.2 1987 25.2 1988 16.8 1989 22.0 1990 29.8 1991 35.6 .1992 27.1 1993 28.2 1994 28.4 1995 26.8 1996 22.7 1997 30.5 1998 30.6 Mean = 27.1 209425.wpd C -2 12.6 -2.8 -2.7 11.2 -8.2 4.2 2.8 -2.4 -4.0 -5.4 7.2 -12.0 7.2 2.2 2.0 -7.7 -0.5 -2.8 3.8 6.1 0.7 4.8 -1.2 -9.6 -4.4 3.4 9.2 0.7 -0.1 0.1 -1.6 -5.6 2.2 2.2 3 > PVJ M: \CAD \2327003 \8723_2.dwg 2.00 04/15/1999 09:13:49 3.0 2.0 x U Z 1.0 c w ) 0.0 3.0 2.0 N W x U Z 1.0 0.0 JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER JANUARY FEBRUARY- MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER ' Adjusted based on Atvmye of other gages PVJ M: \CAD \2327003 \8724_2.DWG 2.00 04/14/1999 14:06:08 3.0 2.0 12 x U Z 1.0 0.0 n I V) w x U Z 3.0 1.0 m .+�.�..1.. rtWKWA T- MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER ,nnu�r rWKVAHT• MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER r- I } Appendix D Streamflow Measurement i Discussion In January 1963, the United States Geological Survey installed a water stage recorder on Nine Mile Creek pursuant to a cooperative agreement with the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. The arrangement with the U.S.G.S. was terminated in August 1973. The Watershed District acquired and began monitoring its own gage at that time. In 1977 -1978, high flows in the creek resulted in erosion of the banks of the creek adjacent to the stream gage. This erosion problem resulted in the gages becoming inoperable during most of 1978 -1980. In 1981, the gage was removed and a new gage was installed at the outlet of Normandale Lake. This gage became fully operational in May 1982. The gage was not operational for the 1997 -98 water year. The table on the following page gives the maximum and minimum flows for the portion of the water year for which records are available (a water year is the conventional period of record from the first of October through the thirtieth of September); the mean discharge for the days of record; and runoff in inches from the watershed for the days of record. r 209425.wpd D -1 Table- Summary of Streamflow Measurements i 9 Column 1: Water Year Column 2: Days of Record Column 3: Maximum Discharge in cfs and Date Column 4: Minimum Discharge in cis and Date Column 5: Mean Discharge in cis (for days of record) Column 6: Runoff in Inches From Watershed (for days of records) ° Column 7: Average Precipitation Over Watershed for calendar year 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 05/82 -09/82 • 44 -5/19 3.0 -7120 '* 23.6 10/82 -09/83 250 69 -6/22 5.0 -8/10 19 6.4 30.2 10/83 -09/84 58 51 -2/20 5.2 -1/28 ** *' 32.5 10/84 -09/85 210 95 -10/18 5.8 -216,7 17 4.8 27.1 10/85 -09/86 4R• 10/86 -09/87 181 750 -7/25# 2.0 -6/16 11 2.7 25.2 10/87 -09/88 254 56 -3/25 1.1 -6/15 7 2.8 16.8 10/88 -09/89 338 59 -5/09 1.7 -2108 9 4.1 22.0 10/89 -09/90 285 143 -3/12 1.0 -12/29 16 6.2 29.8 10/90 -09/91 296 175 -9/15 1.6 -2/1 19 7.7 35.6 10/91 -09/92 212 232 -7/03 5.2- 6/06,07 24 7.1 27.1 10/92 -09/93 285 192 -7/03 1/09 -2/24 31 13.6 27.6 <1.0 10/93 -09/94 157 131.9 -9/15 2.3 -6/4 19 4.1 28.4 10/94 -09/95 285 108.8 -10/18 4.7 -2/7 16 7.1 26.8 10/95 -09/96 338 93 -6/7 4.7 -7/23 15 6.9 22.7 10/96 -09/97 55 22.5 -3/10 5.8 -10/4 11 0.8 30.5 10/97 -09/98 •'• _ _ _ _ _ ' Partial water year. ** No record. * ** Gage inoperative majority of year. j # Estimated - recording capability of gage exceeded: the mean discharge calculated and runoff in inches from watershed did not include runoff from the July 23 -24 rainstorm event. 1 209425.wpd D -2 1998 Water Quality Monitoring Program Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Table of Contents Introduction............................... ............................... E -1 Objectives.............................. ............................... E -2 Report Contents .......................... ............................... E -2 EcologicalUse .............................. ............................... E -3 Methods ............. E -8 Sample Sites ............................. E -8 Stream Monitoring Methods — Continuation of Existing Program ................... E -10 Applicable Water Quality Standards ..... ............................... E -12 Parameter Descriptions ................... ............................... E -13 Temperature........................ ............................... E -13 Dissolved Oxygen .................. ............................... E -13 pH ............. E -13 Turbidity.......................................................... E -14 Specific Conductance ................................................. E -14 Discharge..................... ............................... . . . . E -14 Fecal Coliform Bacteria ............................................... E -15 SuspendedSolids ..................... ............................... E -15 Nitrate Nitrogen ................ ............................... ..... E -15 Phosphorus ......... ............................... E -15 Stream Monitoring Methods — Ecological Use Monitoring Program ........ E -15 Aquatic Organism Surveys .................. E -16 Evaluation of the Stream's Ecological Use .............................. E -16 Analysis of Water Quality Using Biotic Indices E -17 Periphyton Study ........................ ............................... E -18 Results and Discussion ......... ............................... E -23 Comparison with Water Quality Standards ......................... .......... E -23 Water Quality From 1968 to 1998 ........... ..................... E -35 Chlorides and Specific Conductance . ............................... E-45 .......... Dissolved Oxygen ........... ............................... ...... E -52 pH............. Temperature................:... ............................... E -63 Fecal Coliform Bacteria ............ ............................... E -68 Suspended Solids and Turbidity ....... ............................... E -71 Discharge ............................... E -79 ..................... ..... Nitrate Nitrogen E-84 Phosphorus................ ............................... E -87 Ecological Use Classification ............... ............................... E -90 1998 Aquatic Organism Surveys ............ ............................... E -92 Fish.............................................................. E -92 Aquatic Macroinvertebrates and Biotic Indices E-98 Periphyton Study ............................. ..........................E -106 206495.wpd i Table of Contents (continued) Conclusions and Recommendations ............. ............................... E -109 References...... ............................... ..........................E -111 Tables Figures 206495.wpd ii Table of Contents (continued) List of Tables Table 1 Stream System Habitat Rating Form .... ............................... E -5 Table 2 Physical and Chemical Criteria Guidelines for Determination of Ecological Use Classes E -20 Table 3 ............. Procedures for Chemical Analysis Performed on Water Samples E -7 E Table 4 ...... Water Class Standards (Most Restrictive) for Class 2B, 2C, 3B, 3C, 4A, 4B, 5 and -11 6 Figure 6 (Based on Minnesota Rule Chapter 7050) .................. E -12 Table 5 1998 Chloride -Nine Mile Creek E Table 6 ............................ 1998 Specific Conductance -Nine Mile Creek .................... -25 E -26 Table 7 1998 Dissolved Oxygen -Nine Mile Creek .................. E -27 Table 8 1998 Fecal'Coliform Bacteria -Nine Mile Creek ................ E -28 Table 9 1998 pH -Nine Mile Creek .......................... E -29 Table 10 1998 Temperature -Nine Mile Creek .......................... E -30 Table 11 1998 Turbidity -Nine Mile Creek ............................ E -31 Table 12 1998 Discharge -Nine Mile Creek ...................... E -32 Table 13 1998 Suspended Solids -Nine Mile Creek ................... E -33 Table 14 1998 Nitrate- Nitrogen -Nine Mile Creek ..................... E -34 Table 15 1998 Total Phosphorus -Nine Mile Creek ............... E -34 Table 16 Mean Annual Values for Stream Quality Parameters - 1968 -1998 ............ E -36 Table 17 Ecological Use Monitoring Results for Nine Mile Creek in 1997 -1998 .......... E -91 Table 18 Nine Mile Creek Fish Survey -July 29, 1998 .............. E -94 Table 20 Statistically Significant Changes in Nine Mile Creek Water Quality During 1976 through 1998 Indicated by Year -to -Year Changes in HBI Values ............. E -103 Table 21 Calculated Soluble Reactive Phosphorus Based on Periphyton Growth Rates .... E -108 List of Figures Figure 1 Water Quality Monitoring Stations -Nine Mile Creek Watershed District ....... E -9 Figure 2 Figure 3 Periphyton Sampler .............................. Chloride at Stations 1, 2, 7, and 8 E -20 Figure 4 ...................... Chloride at Stations 3, 4, 5, and 6 ................. E-46 E -47 Figure 5 Specific Conductance at Stations 1, 2, 7, and 8 ......... E-48 Figure 6 Specific Conductance at Stations 3, 4, 5, and 6 ....... E-49 Figure 7 Specific Conductance at Stations ECU -2, ECU -2A, ECU -3A, and ECU -5A E -50 Figure 8 . Specific Conductance at Stations ECU -7A, ECU -7B, and ECU -7C ............ E -51 Figure 9 Dissolved Oxygen at Stations 1, 2, 7, and 8 ................. E -54 Figure 10 Dissolved Oxygen at Stations 3, 4, 5, and 6 ........... E -55 Figure 11 Dissolved Oxygen at Stations ECU -2, ECU -2A, ECU -3A, and ECU -5A . E -56 Figure 12 Dissolved Oxygen at Stations ECU -7A, ECU -713, and ECU -7C ............... E -57 Figure 13 pH at Stations 1, 2, 7, and 8 ....................... E Figure 14 . . pH at Stations 3 4 5 and 6 -59 Figure 15 ...... pH at Stations ECU -2, ECU -2A, ECU -3A, and ECU -5A ........ E E -61 Figure 16 pH at Stations ECU -7A, ECU -713, and ECU -7C ...... E -62 Figure 17 Temperature at Stations 1, 2, 7, and 8 ................ E -64 Figure 18 Temperature at Stations 3, 4, 5, and 6 ............. E -65 Figure 19 Temperature at Stations ECU -2, ECU -2A, ECU -3A, and ECU -5A E -66 Figure 20 Temperature at Stations ECU -7A, ECU -713, and ECU -7C .................. E -67 206495.wpd iu Table of Contents (continued) Figure 21 Fecal Coliform at Stations 1, 2, 7, and 8 ............................ E -69 Figure 22 Fecal Coliform at Stations 3, 4, 5, and 6 ............................... E -70 Figure 23 Suspended Solids at Stations 1, 2, 7, and 8 ......................... E -73 Figure 24 Suspended Solids at Stations 3, 4, 5, and 6 ............................ E -74 Figure 25 Turbidity at Stations 1, 2, 7, and 8 ........................ E Figure 26 Turbidity at Stations 3, 4, 5 and 6 ............................. -75 E -76 Figure 27 Turbidity at Stations ECU -2, ECU -2A, ECU -3A, and ECU -5A ........... E -77 Figure 28 Turbidity at Stations ECU -7A, ECU -713, and ECU -7C ......... E -78 Figure 29 .. Discharge at Stations 1, 2, 7, and 8 .... ............................... E -80 Figure 30 Discharge at Stations 3, 4, 5, and 6 ........................... E -81 Figure 31 Discharge at Stations ECU -2, ECU -2A, ECU -3A, and ECU -5A ......... E -82 Figure 32 Discharge at Stations ECU -7A, ECU -713, and ECU -7C .................. E -83 Figure 33 Nitrate- Nitrogen at Stations 1, 2, 7, and 8 ......................... E -85 Figure 34 Nitrate - Nitrogen at Stations 3, 4, 5, and 6 .................... . . . . . . E -86 Figure 35 Total Phosphorus at Stations 1, 2, 7, and 8 ................. . E -88 Figure 36 Total Phosphorus at Stations 3, 4, 5, and 6 ............................ E -89 Figure 37 Nine Mile Creek Ecological Use -North Fork at Cahill Road 1974 -1998 ....... E -95 Figure 38 Nine Mile Creek Ecological Use -Main Stem at Marsh Lake Dam 1974 -1998 ... E -96 Figure 39 Nine Mile Creek Ecological Use -Main Stem at 106th Street 1974 -1998 ....... E -97 Figure 40 1998 Nine Mile Creek HBI and ICI -Based Indices ........................ E -104 Figure 41 Nine Mile Creek HBI, 1976 -1998 HBI for Upstream Sites and for Main Stem ... E -105 Figure 42 Periphyton Chlorophyll a from 1998 Periphyton Monitoring Stations .......... E -107 206495.wpd 1V Introduction The environmental program for Nine Mile Creek was established by the Board of Managers in 1968. When the program was initiated, a network of eight sampling locations was established near the borders of various municipalities so that the water quality of Nine Mile Creek could be monitored as it entered and left each community. These eight stations have been monitored since 1968. In 1972, four biological sampling stations were added to the program. Aquatic invertebrates and fish were collected from these stations during 1972 through 1996 to further evaluate the water quality of Nine Mile Creek. During 1997 through 1998 the Nine Mile Creek Use Attainability Analysis (UAA) (Barr, 1998a), was completed to assess the current ecological integrity of the stream and develop management recommendations to maintain and/or improve the stream's ecological integrity. The UAA was a project that the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District (NMCWD) committed to undertake in its recently completed Nine Mile Creek Watershed District —Water Management Plan, (Barr, 1996) prepared in accordance with the Metropolitan Surface Water Management Act and Watershed Law: Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 103B and 103D. The UAA determined that urbanization impacts have become a natural characteristic of the stream and remedial- (structural) measures are unlikely to remove all of these impacts. However, because improving the water quality and habitat conditions of the stream to the greatest extent possible is inherently beneficial, management projects were recommended to preserve and/or improve existing habitat, flow, and water quality conditions of Nine Mile Creek. Recommended projects include streambank stabilization and the continued management of urban stormwater runoff. District rules were recommended to assist in preserving and/or improving stream water quality and habitat. Following completion of the UAA, the Nine Mile Creek water quality monitoring program was expanded to include the monitoring of stream stations and parameters used in the completion of the UAA The expansion was warranted because changes in stream flow and physiochemical conditions may change the attainable use of the stream and the stream management goals resulting from its attainable use. Consequently, monitoring of seven additional monitoring locations (i.e., ecological use stations) was added to the stream water quality monitoring program during 1997. Monitoring parameters of ecological use stations included flow, physiochemical parameters, and biological organisms (i.e., fish, macroinvertebrates, and periphyton). Biological monitoring from locations monitored in previous years was discontinued because most locations were proximal to ecological use stations. 206495.wpd E-1 i Objectives Water quality variables were monitored in Nine Mile Creek during the 1998 growing season. Monitoring results are used to: (1) evaluate the stream's water quality, (2) determine if water quality standards are being met, (3) identify trends in water quality, (4) isolate possible sources of water quality degradation when they occur, and (5) evaluate the stream's ecological use. Report Contents This report begins with a discussion of ecological use classification to facilitate an understanding of the changes made to the water quality program during 1997. The study methods are then discussed including: • Sample Sites • Stream Monitoring Methods • Applicable Water Quality Standards and Study Parameters • Aquatic Organism Surveys • Evaluation of the Stream's Ecological Use • Analysis of Water Quality Using Biotic Indices • Periphyton Study Methods Study results are discussed including: • Comparison with Water Quality Standards • Water Quality from 1968 to 1998 • Ecological Use Classification • 1998 Aquatic Organism Surveys including the fish and macroinvertebrate surveys, an analysis of water quality using biotic indices, and the periphyton study 206495.wpd E -2 Ecological Use As a part of the Nine Mile Creek UAA, the stream was classified as to ecological use (Barr 1998a). Ecological use classification (EUC) was developed by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources "to describe potential stream uses and provide a basis for making and supporting water ` management decisions" (Ball, 1982). This classification method considers the ability of organisms to inhabit a stream of a given water quality. Ecological use refers to a class of organisms capable of inhabiting a stream. Classifications are based on a physical habitat evaluation, stream flow, dissolved oxygen concentration, temperature, pH range, and presence of toxic compounds. A E stream is classified as to its potential to support one of five ecological use classes: A. Coldwater sport fish B. Warm water sport fish C. Intolerant forage fish, intolerant macroinvertebrates, or a valuable population of tolerant forage fish D. Tolerant or very tolerant forage fish or rough fish or tolerant macroinvertebrates E. Very tolerant macroinvertebrates or no aquatic life Ecological use classification (EUC) is a three -step process of evaluating: (1) habitat, (2) representative low flow, and (3) water quality. The five Classes (A -E) are defined by criteria for habitat rating, minimum flow, minimum dissolved oxygen, maximum temperature, pH range, and the presence of toxic substances. Some of the criteria overlap, such as the habitat rating for use Classes A, B, and C, but the entire suite of criteria are unique to each use class. The criteria ! generally follow a continuum through the range of a particular parameter. The exception is the minimum flow criteria, which decrease from use class A through E, except for use Class B. Warm water sport fish (Class B) require a discharge of at least 3 cubic feet per second —six times the minimum flow for cold water sport fish (Class A). The stream habitat rating form is presented in i Table 1. The criteria for determination of ecological use classes are presented in Table 2. Ecological use classification of Nine Mile Creek was completed during 1997 through 1998 as part of the Nine Mile Creek Use Attainability Analysis (Barr, 1998a). The classification was based on habitat surveys completed in 1997 and long -term water quality conditions of the stream determined from 1968 through 1997 District stream monitoring data (Barr 1998a). Habitats will be evaluated again approximately every 5 to 10 years because they are not expected to change 206495.wpd E -3 C significantly on an annual basis. Physical and chemical criteria are evaluated annually because they are subject to change (e.g., change with climate or watershed development changes). Changes in physical and chemical parameters may indicate a change in the stream's ecological use. Physical and chemical criteria monitored annually are minimum flow, minimum dissolved oxygen, maximum temperature, pH range, and toxic substances. Biological organisms are evaluated annually to assess the stream's actual ecological use and to identify changes in ecological use. 206495.wpd E-4 e 3 Table 1 Stream System Habitat Rating Form Stream County Reach Location Reach Score/Rating Date Evaluator Classification 206495.wpd E -5 Category Excellent Good Fair Poor Rating Item Watershed Erosion No evidence of Some erosion evident. Moderate erosion evident. Heavy erosion evident. significant erosion. No significant "raw" Erosion from heavy storm Probable erosion from any Stable forest or grass areas. Good land mgmt. events obvious. Some runoff. land. Little potential for practices in area. Low "raw" areas. Potential for future erosion. potential for significant significant erosion. erosion 14 16 8 10 Watershed Nonpoint Source No evidence of Some potential sources Moderate sources (small Obvious sources (major significant source. Little (roads, urban area, farm wetlands, tile fields, urban wetland drainage, high potential for future fields). area, intense agriculture). use urban or industrial problem. area, feed lots, impoundment). 8 10 14 16 Bank Erosion, Failure No evidence of Infrequent, small areas, Moderate frequency and Many eroded areas. significant erosion or mostly healed over. size. Some "raw" spots. "Raw" areas frequent bank failure. Little Some potential in Erosion potential during along straight sections and potential for future extreme floods. high flow. bends. problem. 4 8 16 20 Bank Vegetative Protection 90% plant density. 70 -90% density. Fewer 50 -70% density. <50% density. Many raw Diverse trees, shrubs, plant species. A few Dominated by grass, areas. Thin grass, few if grass. Plants healthy barren or thin areas. sparse trees and shrubs. any trees and shrubs. with apparently good Vegetation appears Plant types and conditions root system. generally health. suggest poorer soil 6 9 binding. 15 18 Lower Bank Channel Capacity Ample for present peak Adequate. Overbank Barely contains present Inadequate, overbank flow plus some increase. flows rare. W/D ratio peaks. Occasional flow common. W/D ratio Peak flow contained. 8 -15. overbank flow. W/D ratio >25. W/D ratio <7. 15 -25. 8 10 14 16 Lower Bank Deposition Little or no enlargement Some new increase in Moderate deposition of Heavy deposits of fine of channel or point bars. bar formation, mostly new gravel and coarse material, increased bar from coarse gravel. sand on old and some new development. bars. 6 9 15 18 Bottom Scouring and Less than 5% of the 5 -30% affected. Scour 30 -50% affected: More than 50% of the Deposition bottom affected by at constrictions and Deposits and scour at bottom changing nearly scouring and deposition. where grades steepen. obstructions, constrictions year long. Pools almost Some deposition in and bends. Some filling absent due to deposition. Pools. of pools. 4 8 16 1 20 206495.wpd E -5 0 206495.wpd E -6 _. Category Excellent Good Fair Poor Rating Item Bottom Substrate/Available Greater than 50% rubble, 30 -50% rubble, gravel or 10 -30% rubble, gravel or Less than 10% rubble, 3 Cover gravel or other stable other stable habitat. other stable habitat. gravel or other stable habitat Adequate habitat Habitat availability less habitat. Lack of habitat is 2 7 than desirable. 17 obvious. i� � Avg. Depth Riffles and Runs Cold >I' 0 6" to 1' 6 3" to 6" 18 , <i" ; Warm >1.5' 0 10" to 1.5' 6 6" to 10" 18 <6" ; Avg. Depth of Pools Cold >4' 0 3' to 4' 6 2' to 3' 18 Q' 24 Warm >5' 0 4' to 5' 6 3' to 4' 18 <i' ; Flow, at Rep. Low Flow Cold >2 cfs 0 1 -2 cfs 6 .5 -1 cfs 18 <3 cfs Warn >5 cfs 0 2 -5 cfs 6 1 -2 cfs 18 <1 cfs 24 Pool/Rime, Run/Bend Ratio 5 -7. Variety of habitat. 7 -15. Adequate depth in 15 -25. Occasional riffle >25. Essentially a (distance between riffles T Deep riffles and pools. pools and rimes. Bends or bend. Bottom contours straight stream. Generally stream width) provide habitat. provide some habitat. all flat water or shallow 4 8 16 rime. Poor habitat. 2 Aesthetics Wilderness High natural beauty. Common setting, not Stream does not enhance characteristics, Trees, historic site. offensive. Developed but aesthetics. Condition of outstanding natural Some development may uncluttered area. stream is offensive. beauty. Usually wooded be visible. or unpastured corridor. 8 10 14 to s Column Totals: Column Scores E +G +F +P = = Score <70 = Excellent, 71 -129 = Good, 130 -200 = Fair, >200 = Poor 206495.wpd E -6 _. 43 Table 2 Physical and Chemical Criteria Guidelines for Determination of Ecological Use Classes Habitat Column Scores: [En <70] = Excellent; [71 5 Fn 5129] = Good; [130:5 Fn <200] = Fair; [En >200] = Poor 206495.wpd E -7 Parameters Water Quality Variables Minimum Minimum Dissolved Maximum Use Habitat Flow Oxygen Temperature pH Range Toxic Class Description Rating" (cfs) (mg /L) ( °F) (S.U.) Substances A Cold water sport fish >0.5 >4 <75 5 <pH <9.5 B Warm water sport fish >3 Fair to Excellent <acute C Intolerant forage fish, intolerant macroinvertebrates, or a (Fn <144) >3 <86 5 <pH <10.5 valuable population of. tolerant >0.2 forage fish D Tolerant or very tolerant forage or rough fish, or tolerant macro- Fair (200> In >144) >0.1 >1 <90 4 <pH <11 acute invertebrates E Very tolerant macroinverte- Poor brates or no aquatic life (in >200) >0.0 <1 >90 1 <pH <14 >acute Habitat Column Scores: [En <70] = Excellent; [71 5 Fn 5129] = Good; [130:5 Fn <200] = Fair; [En >200] = Poor 206495.wpd E -7 r Methods Sample Sites In 1998, the stream monitoring stations included the eight sites established in 1968. Also included were seven locations established in 1997 to represent physically distinct reaches of the stream. The stations established in 1997 were used in the ecological classification of the stream and are currently used to evaluate the parameters that comprise the streams' ecological use classification criteria. Figure 1 shows the location of the previous sample stations (numeric codes) and the new Ecological Use monitoring stations (alphanumeric codes). The locations of the eight sampling stations established in 1968 are: • Station 1 —is on the North Fork of Nine Mile Creek at T. H. 169, formerly County Road 18, in Minnetonka. • Station 2 —is on the North Fork of Nine Mile Creek near the intersection of T.H. 100 and I -494 in Edina. • Station 3—is at Rowland Road upstream of Bryant Lake in Minnetonka. • Station 4—is on the Glen Lake branch of the South Fork of Nine Mile Creek in Eden Prairie. • Station 5—is on the South Fork of Nine Mile Creek at County Road 18, downstream of Stations 3 and 4, in Edina. • Station 6—is on the South Fork of Nine Mile Creek, downstream of Stations 3, 4 and 5, at East Bush Lake Road in Bloomington. • Station 7 —is on the Main Stem of Nine Mile Creek upstream of Marsh Lake at France Avenue in Bloomington. • Station 8—is in Anderson Park in Bloomington and is the farthest downstream sampling station on Nine Mile Creek. 206495.wpd E -8 Minnetoga Lake Wing Lake 7 Ar Lake. Rose . lei? a T 117 N T O O F Smetana Lake L Anderson La R22W P21W " ; "', 1 r'-- 11 , Hignianas Lake R21W R24W 0 0 5000 1 —j Scale in Feet A Stream Water Quality Monitoring Stations 40 Ecological Use Monitoring Stations FIGURE 1 NINE MILE CREEK WATERSHED 1998 STREAM WATER QUALITY MONITORING L-9 The locations of the seven ecological use monitoring stations established in 1997 are: • ECU -2 —is on the North Fork of Nine Mile Creek, East of Cahill Road near Brook Drive, approximately mid -way between the Highway 62 crossing upstream and the Highway 100 crossing downstream in Edina. • ECU -2A —is on the North Fork of Nine Mile Creek, downstream of Interstate 494 and immediately upstream from 81st Street in Bloomington. • ECU -3A —is on the South Fork of Nine Mile Creek, immediately upstream of the Highway 62 crossing and the Bryant Lake Park Reserve and downstream from Bren Road in Minnetonka. • ECU -5A —is on the South Fork of Nine Mile Creek, in Corridor Park immediately upstream from Interstate 494 in Bloomington. E i • ECU -7A —is on the Main Stem of Nine Mile Creek, downstream of Marsh Lake and immediately downstream of 98th Street in Bloomington. • ECU -7B—is on the Main Stem of Nine Mile Creek, downstream of Old Shakopee Road at 103 Street in Bloomington. • ECU -7C—is on the Main Stem of Nine Mile Creek, downstream of 106th Street in Bloomington. Stream Monitoring Methods — Continuation of Existing Program The current network of eight monitoring stations, initiated in 1968, was monitored monthly during March through October. Dissolved oxygen, temperature, pH, specific conductance, turbidity, and discharge were measured in the stream at these locations. Grab samples were analyzed monthly to determine concentrations of fecal coliform bacteria, chlorides and suspended solids. Samples were analyzed for total phosphorus and nitrate - nitrite nitrogen approximately quarterly (i.e., during March, July and October). Procedures for the analyses of all Nine Mile Creek Watershed District samples are presented in Table 3. 206495.wpd E -10 Table 3 Procedures for Chemical Analysis Performed on Water Samples If Analysis Pro cs ure Reference Chloride Automated, Titrimetric U.S. EPA Methods of Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes, 325.2, 325.3 Dissolved Oxygen Electrode Standard Methods, 16th Edition, 1985, 421F Fecal Coliform Organisms Membrane Filter Standard Methods, 16th Edition, 1985, 909C Nitrate Nitrogen Calorimetric Lachat Instruments Quik Chem Method No. 10- 107- 04 -1 -C and Standard Methods, 16th Edition, 1985, 418C and 418F PH Potentiometric Standard Methods, 16th Edition, Measurement, 1985, 423 Glass Electrode Specific Conductance Wheatstone Bridge Standard Methods, 16th Edition, 1985, 205 Suspended Solids Gravimetric, Standard Methods, 16th Edition, 1985, 209D 103 -105 °C Temperature Thermometric Standard Methods, 16th Edition, 1985, 212 i Total Phosphorus Persulfate Digestion, Standard Methods, 16th Edition, 1985, 424C.III, 424F, Manual Ascorbic Acid and Environmental Letters 9(1), 43 -53 (1975) Turbidity Nephelometric via Turbidimeter Standard Methods, 16th Edition, 1985, r 214A 1 i 206495.wpd E -11 Applicable Water Quality Standards Water quality data collected from Nine Mile Creek during 1998 were compared to applicable water 4 quality standards. Minnesota has numeric and narrative water quality standards for waters of the State in (Minnesota Rule Chapter 7050). The standards are based on designated actual and/or potential uses for the stream. Nine Mile Creek has been classified under Minn. R. Pt. 7050.0220 as fisheries and recreational streams —Class 2B waters. This classification describes a water quality that will support cool or warm water fish populations as well as being suitable for all forms of recreational activities, including swimming. The standards applicable to Nine Mile Creek are the most restrictive of Classes 2B, 2C, 3B, 3C, 4A, 4B, 5 and 6. The specific standards applicable to Nine Mile Creek are shown in Table 4. r Table 4 Water Class Standards (Most Restrictive) for Class 2B, 2C, 3B, 3C, 4A, 4B, 5 and 6 (Based on Minnesota Rule Chapter 7050) Parameter Water quality Standard Chloride, mg/L Not to exceed 100 mg/L Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L Not less than 5 mg/L at all times (instantaneous minimum concentration)H Fecal Coliform Organisms, No. /100 mL Not to exceed 2006 pH, Standard Units 6.5 -8.5 Specific Conductance, pmhos/cm ® 25 °C Not to exceed 1,000 Temperature, °F 5 °F above natural streams Turbidity, NTU Not to exceed 25 a This dissolved oxygen standard shall be construed to require compliance with the standard 50 percent of the days at which the flow of the receiving water is equal to the lowest weekly flow with a 1 -in -10 years recurrence total. 6 200 organisms /100 mL as a logarithmic mean measured in not less than five samples in any calendar month, nor shall more than 10 percent of all samples taken during any calendar month individually exceed 2,000 organisms/100 mL (applies only between March 1 and October 31). Based on monthly average of the maximum daily temperature, except in no case shall it exceed the daily average temperature of 86 °F. 206495.wpd E-12 Parameter Descriptions The following paragraphs discuss the water quality parameters and standards in greater detail. Temperature. The measurement of water temperature is important because of its effect on fish and other aquatic organisms. The successful growth and reproduction of various fish species is dependent on the maintenance of specific temperature ranges. Cold water sport fish require water temperatures less than 75 °F. Warm water sport fish and pollution- intolerant forage fish require water temperatures less than 86 °F. All other fish require water temperatures less than 90 °F. The temperature standard established by the Minn. Rule Chapter 7050 for all stations requires that any discharge into the stream must not increase the downstream water temperature by more than 5 °F. The standard further requires that the water temperature must never be higher than 86 °F. Dissolved Oxygen. Dissolved oxygen levels are important to water I quality in providing a suitable habitat for fish and other aquatic life. Low dissolved oxygen concentrations can indicate an upstream discharge of oxygen- demanding substances, low stream velocities, or oxygen consumption by bottom sediments. Dissolved oxygen is consumed in large quantities by bacteria during the decomposition of organic material. The organic matter may be of natural origin or may result from the addition of sewage, industrial waste, or stormwater runoff to the 'stream. Depression of dissolved oxygen will cause a shift from desirable game fish populations to less desirable fish populations such as carp and catfish. Cold water sport fish need dissolved oxygen concentrations to be greater than 4 mg/L. Warm water sport fish and pollution- intolerant forage fish are stressed at oxygen concentrations of 3 mg/L or less. Ali other fish require oxygen concentrations to be greater than 1 mg/L. Water quality standards require that an ample supply of oxygen be available to sustain the desired aquatic life throughout the year. The numeric.water quality standard for Class 2B waters requires that an oxygen concentration of not less than 5 milligrams per liter (mg/L) be maintained at all times. pH. The hydrogen ion concentration in the system is indicated by pH (pH = -log [H *]). It is measured on a scale of 1 to 14, with a pH of 7 indicating an equal balance between acidic and basic ions and a neutral pH. pH values below 7 indicate increasingly .acidic properties, and-pH values above 7 indicate increasingly basic properties. The pH of most natural waters is near neutrality and pH extremes at either end of the scale are rare because of the buffering capacity of natural waters. A low pH can be caused by acidic discharges or by high concentrations of organic acids. The water quality standard specifies a pH range from 6.5 to 8.5 for Nine Mile Creek. The 206495.wpd E -13 i s standard is intended to protect all aquatic life, as well as other designated uses. Cold water sport fish can survive within a pH range of 5 to 9.5; warm water sport fish, and pollution - intolerant forage fish can survive within a pH range of 5 to 10; pollution - tolerant fish can survive within a pH range of 4 to 11. Turbidity. Turbidity is a measure of the inability of light to pass through a water sample. Higher turbidity is equivalent to lower light transmission (i.e., low water clarity). Water of high turbidity 4 has a murky appearance because it scatters and absorbs the light. Turbidity can result from inorganic solids, such as suspended sediments, and organic matter, such as plankton. High turbidity can interfere with the growth and reproduction of aquatic organisms. Minnesota's water quality standard applicable to Nine Mile Creek requires that turbidity not exceed 25 nephelometric turbidity units (NTU). i Specific Conductance. Specific conductance, or electrical conductivity, is an indication of the amount of dissolved ionized minerals in water. Ionized minerals have the capacity to carry an electrical current, which can be measured. Specific conductance is a measurement of electrical j conductivity over a specific distance between electrodes. A high specific conductance measurement is an indication that large quantities of dissolved ionized minerals are present in a stream. The concentration of dissolved ions in a system frequently reflects the level of environmental damage to a watershed.. Highly disturbed watersheds frequently have streams with high dissolved ion concentrations. Extremely high dissolved solids concentrations will affect aquatic life by upsetting the osmotic balance and inhibiting water absorption. In addition, specific dissolved ions may cause toxic effects. A low specific conductance measurement is an indication that dissolved ionized minerals are present in low quantities in a stream. The Minnesota water quality standard applicable to Nine Mile Creek specifies that specific conductance not exceed 1,000 pmhos/cm at f 25 °C. Discharge. Discharge is a measurement of stream flow and is measured in cubic feet per second (cfs). It is a function of the quantity of water in the stream and the rate (i.e., velocity) that the water is flowing. The MPCA has not established a standard for discharge, although discharge affects water quality. For example, high flows can cause higher turbidity because of resuspended sediments or higher dissolved oxygen concentrations because of increased aeration of the water. l The flow or quantity of water available to support aquatic organisms is of primary importance in the ecological use of a stream. Flow stability or frequency also becomes an important factor in some streams. Flow extremes, especially in streams running through altered watersheds, can be a `s major factor in determining appropriate uses. z' 206495.wpd E -14 Fecal Coliform Bacteria. Fecal coliform bacteria levels are used as indicators of the potential presence of disease- carrying bacteria, although the fecal coliform themselves are not typically a health hazard. Waterfowl and surface runoff containing wildlife and pet waste are the usual contributors of fecal coliform bacteria to streams. Higher levels generally are found during the summer months when the water temperature is warm, because fecal coliform bacteria survive best in water temperatures similar to warm - blooded animals. Suspended Solids. Suspended solids include both organic and inorganic material. The organic fraction includes algae, leaves, grass, and oil. The inorganic fraction includes sand, silt, and clay. High suspended solids concentrations tend to settle out in slow - moving water, smothering organisms and interfering with the food web. Suspended solids may accumulate in the gills of fish. High suspended solids concentrations, therefore, may be injurious or toxic to fish. The MPCA has not established a suspended solids standard for Nine Mile Creek. However, it has established a standard applicable only to effluents discharged into streams. The suspended solids effluent standard is 30 milligrams of suspended solids per liter of water discharged into Class 2B waters. Nitrate Nitrogen. Nitrogen is a nutrient essential for the growth of algae and aquatic plants. High concentrations of nitrogen in streams, especially in streams discharging into lakes, can offset the delicate nutrient balance in the lake and contribute to nuisance algae blooms. High concentrations may also contribute to weed growths in streams and lakes. Because of the high solubility of nitrogen, high nitrogen concentrations can indicate the presence of agricultural runoff, sanitary landfill leachate, municipal sewage or stormwater runoff. High concentrations of nitrate nitrogen have not been shown to be injurious to aquatic life. Phosphorus. Both the maximum obtainable standing crop of algae and the rate of algal growth are largely dependent on nutrient concentrations. Past monitoring data have demonstrated that phosphorus is the nutrient that controls the growth of algae and aquatic plants in Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Lakes (NMCWD). Nine Mile Creek flows into Bryant Lake, Lake Smetana, and Normandale Lake, thereby influencing the phosphorus concentrations of three NMCWD lakes. Stream Monitoring Methods— Ecological Use Monitoring Program Water chemistry and flow parameters were measured at seven ecological use sample locations for the first time during 1997 and were measured again in 1998. Measurements occurred monthly during March through October and focused on the parameters used in the ecological use classification of the streams. The following parameters were monitored: 206495.wpd E -15 • Dissolved Oxygen • Temperature • Specific Conductance • pH l • Turbidity • Discharge Aquatic Organism Surveys Aquatic macroinvertebrate and fish surveys were conducted at the seven ecological use stations (Figure 1). r` Macroinvertebrate surveys were conducted on October 5, 1998. A D -frame aquatic net was used to collect invertebrate samples. Samples were collected by disturbing the substrate with one's feet and allowing dislodged invertebrates to drift into the net downstream, and also by passing the D -net through the debris and vegetation. Rocks and other substrate materials were also examined t for invertebrates. A macroinvertebrate survey was not completed at Station ECU -3A because of insufficient flow. Fish samples were collected using a 3/ -inch mesh, 4 -foot by 12 -foot nylon seine and five passes were made at each station. Fish surveys were conducted on July 29, 1998. Fish were surveyed at six ecological use Stations (2, 2A, 5A, 7A, 7B, and 7C). A fish survey was not completed at Station ECU -3A because of insufficient flow. In previous years, fish and invertebrate samples were generally collected during July. However, recent research results (Hilsenhoff, personal communication, 1994) suggest that October i invertebrate samples provide a more representative assessment of the stream's water quality than summer samples. Therefore, the sampling program was changed in 1994 to include invertebrate sample collection during October. Evaluation of the Stream's Ecological Use The fish species identified at each Nine Mile Creek sample station were classified as to ecological use per.WDNR classification (Ball 1982). An average existing ecological use for each station was determined by assigning a numeric value to the ecological use classes (1 to 4) and calculating the average ecological use score for each station. For example, a largemouth bass was assigned to Class B and a creek chub was assigned to Class D. Each use class was then assigned a number to 206495.wpd E -16' 0 facilitate the determination of an average ecological use (i.e., cold water sport fish = 4.0, warm water sport fish = 3.0, intolerant forage fish = 2.0, tolerant forage fish = 1.0, and very tolerant forage or rough fish = 0.0). The average ecological use was calculated from the formula: Average Ecological Use = E ai ni N . Where: n; = the number of individuals in each species or genus a, = the ecological use value _for that species or genus N = the total number of individuals in the sample The average existing ecological use of each stream location was determined as follows: Class A, cold water fish = 3.54.0 Class B, warm water sport fish = 2.5 -3.4 Class C, intolerant forage fish = 1.5 -2.4 Class D, tolerant forage fish = 0.5 -1.4 Class E, tolerant macroinvertebrates = 0.0 -0.4 The numbers and species of fish collected from each location were evaluated and compared with WDNR- criteria for ecological use classification (i.e., proposed changes to WDNR ecological use classification Ball, 1997). WDNRrcriteria require a fish population of 50 fish per 100 meters for Class B and Class C categories. Collection of fewer than 50 fish from a sampling location resulted in a classification of Class D even though a higher use was indicated by the types of fish collected. Analysis of Water Quality Using Biotic Indices The 1998 invertebrate data from Nine Mile Creek were analyzed using Hilsenhoffs Biotic Index (HBI), and evaluated for long -term trends. The biotic index (Hilsenhoff, 1987) was developed from research on more than 1,000 small streams in Wisconsin (Hilsenhoff, 1982 and 1987). Small streams typically have a naturally low biological diversity, which is unrelated to their water quality. Other water quality indices attribute low biological diversity to poor water quality. Research, however, indicates that Hilsenhoffs biotic index does an excellent job of ranking small streams in this region according to their water quality. 206495.wpd E -17 e The HBI is a measure of organic and nutrient pollution, which causes lower dissolved oxygen 1 levels, especially at night during the summer and after a heavy rain. Lower levels of dissolved g oxygen in turn affect the ability of each species of arthropod (i.e., aquatic insects, amphipods, and isopods) to survive in a particular stream. For the purpose of calculating the biotic index, every species or genus has been assigned index values from 0 -10; with 0 assigned to species most intolerant of organic pollution and 10 assigned to the most tolerant species. Intermediate values were assigned to species intermediate in their tolerance of organic pollution. The HBI is an a average of tolerance values for all individuals collected from a site. The water quality of each station was then determined from the biotic index value as illustrated below: Biotic Index Water Quality Degree of Organic Pollution 0.00 -3.50 Excellent No apparent organic pollution 3.51 -4.50 Very Good Possible slight organic pollution 4.51 -5.50 Good Some organic pollution 5.51 -6.50 Fair Fairly significant organic pollution ' 6.51 -7.50 Fairly Poor Si gni ficant organic pollution 7.51 -8.50 Poor Very significant organic pollution 8.51 -10.00 Very Poor Severe organic pollution r In 1997, the District supplemented the HBI with a second index that is similar but uses tolerance values derived from the Invertebrate Community Index (ICI), developed by the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (DeShon, 1995). The ICI -based index uses the data collected for the HBI but includes a wider range of invertebrates (e.g., Annelida and Mollusca). The ICI r tolerance values were derived from the abundance of each taxa and the quality of the streams in which they were found. The scale for the ICI ranges from 0 to 60, with 60 being the highest quality. Like the HBI, the numeric scores are grouped according to water - quality categories, ranging from poor to exceptional. Those categories are not used here, however, because the category divisions are based on Ohio reference sites and may not be applicable to Minnesota. The index is used here instead as a relative measure for comparison with the HBI (i.e., as a second opinion). Periphyton Study Beginning in 1997 and continuing in 1998, periphyton (attached algae) samples were collected to determine periphyton growth rates and to estimate soluble reactive phosphorus concentrations in water at three stream Stations (EUC -2A, EUC -5A, and EUC -7C). Periphytometers (submerged banks of glass slides, See Figure 2) were installed in June. Samples were collected weekly during a four week period. Each periphytometer held eight slides and each sample consisted of two slides. The periphyton colonized the slides and were expected to continue to grow and increase their 206495.wpd E -18 I 3 biomass on the slides over the four week period, provided they were undisturbed by scouring or grazing by macroinvertebrates. Colonized periphyton slides were removed in the field and placed into a slide holder. Samples were kept on ice until processed (i.e., the same day as collection). Sample processing consisted of cell removal, concentration of cells onto a filter, and analyses of cells (i.e., chlorophyll a). A razor blade was used to remove the cells from microscope slides. The contents from the pair of slides collected from each location were then concentrated by filtering onto a Whatman GF /C glass fiber filter. Filters containing periphyton samples were folded with the sample toward the inside, wrapped in aluminum foil, and placed on ice. All samples were analyzed for chlorophyll a. Chlorophyll a was determined as follows: Chl a (µg) = (26.7(664" - 665AA) V) L Where: 664BA = Before Acid Absorbency at 664 NM — Before Acid Absorbency at 750 NM 665AA = After Acid Absorbency at 665 NM — After Acid Absorbency at 750 NM V, = Volume of Extract in L L = Light Path Length (cm) Chlorophyll a on an aerial basis was determined by: 206495.wpd Chl a qWm) = Chi a/Arca of Slides E -19 F7o;v Peri phy-ton Samp er 33-1-2 1 " A Peri phytometer H Sampler Depth of Slides 1" Below Water Surface E -20 FIGURE 2 PERIPHYTON SAMPLER Periphyton growth rates were determined for each periphyton sample as follows: Growth Rate (�y) ° In T - T In x, 2 1 Where: s X2 = periphyton biomass (i.e., chlorophyll a in )xg(m2) at the end of the time interval Xl = periphyton biomass (i.e., chlorophyll a in )xg(m2) at the beginning of the time interval T2 Tl = growth period in days Growth rates were then corrected for photoperiod and water temperature, two variables causing spatial and temporal differences in growth rates. The corrections were necessary to estimate the soluble reactive phosphorus concentrations during growth periods. Growth rates were corrected for photoperiod by: 9 µ/ = P PP Where: P! = Growth Rate Corrected for Photoperiod p = Growth Rate PP = Photoperiod (days) Where: PP = 0.36 day + (cos 9) 0.28 day Where: Where: JD = Julian Day # 20649b.wpd 9= JD- 172 *2a 365 E -21 E s Growth rates corrected for photoperiod were then corrected for water temperature as follows: µu = µ' WTCF 1 Where: µ" = Growth rate corrected for photoperiod and water temperature W = Growth rate corrected for photoperiod WTCF = Water Temperature Correction Factor and WTCF = Water Tempffahm During The One Week Gmwth Period Maximum Water Temperature During The Four Week Sample Period On a per station basis, the maximum growth rate for the four -week sampling period was then determined from the corrected growth rates (i.e., corrected for both photoperiod and water temperature). The soluble reactive phosphorus concentration associated with the monthly maximum growth rate was then estimated as follows: i, P µ = µ�P +Kr j Where: µ = Specific growth rate at limiting nutrient concentration P (i.e., the maximum monthly growth rate corrected for photoperiod and water temperature) µ� = 0.851 * (1.066)` and is the growth rate at saturating concentration of nutrient or the maximum expected growth rate. = the maximum water temperature during the four week sample period. KP = a constant analogous to the Michaelis- Menton constant of enzyme kinetics; being numerically equal to the substrate concentration supporting a growth rate equal to 1/2 1... Values range from 1 -10 pg/L and a value of 7 pg/L was used. P = the estimated soluble reactive phosphorus concentration. 206496.wpd E -22 N Results and Discussion Comparison with Water Quality Standards The measured values from Nine Mile Creek stations for the parameters listed in Table 3 are tabulated in Tables 5 through 15. Measured values that exceed the water quality standard are d shaded in the table. In Table 5, stream data are compared to the chloride water quality standards for Class 3B (100 mg/L) and Class 2B (230 mg(L). The Class 3B standard is intended to protect for industrial use of the water, whereas the Class -2B standard protects aquatic life. The most restrictive standard (i.e., 100 mg(L) is applicable to Nine Mile Creek. Twenty one percent of the chloride values measured during 1998 exceeded this standard (Table 5). The standard was exceeded in six of eight stream monitoring stations during March. The high chloride values apparently were caused by road de -icing chemicals found in snowmelt runoff occurring near the time of sample collection. Additional exceedances of the standard occurred at two stations during April and May and at three stations during September. Because the stream did not receive surface runoff near the time of sampling, the higher values apparently were caused by higher chloride levels in groundwater. Seven, percent of the specific conductance values measured during 1998 exceeded the MPCA standard (Table 6). Specific conductance was above the MPCA standard (i.e., 1,000 pmho /cm 25 °C) at five stations in March. The high specific conductance values during March were probably caused by road de -icing chemicals found in snowmelt runoff occurring near the time of sampling. High values were observed at Stations 1, 2, and 4 during September. High values occurring during September were apparently caused by groundwater contributions of chloride to the stream. The dissolved oxygen water quality standard for warm and cool water streams is a minimum of 5 mg/L. Twenty eight percent of dissolved oxygen values measured during 1998 failed to comply with the MPCA standard (Table 7). All values measured at Stations 2, 8, ECU -2A, and ECU -?C complied with the MPCA standard throughout 1998. Low dissolved oxygen values (below 5.0 mg(L) were common at other stations during the summer and fall months. The low oxygen measurements in 1998 were apparently caused by low flow conditions that prevented oxygenation of the stream and by stormwater runoff conditions. 206495.wpd E -23 Forty percent of the fecal coliform bacteria values measured in Nine Mile Creek during 1998 i exceeded the MPCA standard (Table 8). Bacteria values generally exceeded MPCA criteria during June through October. MPCA criteria were met during March through May. Fecal coliform bacteria are added to streams by animals, wildlife, and from surface runoff. Surface runoff from storms occurring on August 2 (0.57 inches) and August 3 (1.54 inches) resulted in bacteria levels greater than 3,400 fecal coliform colonies per 100 mL at all sample locations on August 3. Six percent of the pH values measured in Nine Mile Creek during 1998 failed to meet the MPCA standard (Table 9). The slightly acidic values were found in the downstream reaches of the Main Stem, including Stations 7, 8, ECU -7A, ECU -7B, and ECU -7C. Acidic values were observed at two locations during April, three locations during July, and three locations during August. } All temperature values measured during 1998 were within MPCA criteria (Table 10) Five percent of turbidity values measured in Nine Mile Creek during 1998 exceeded the 25 NTU standard (Table 11). Turbidity values were within MPCA criteria during all sample events except August 3. Precipitation occurring on August 2 through 3 (i.e., total of 2.11 inches) is the apparent cause of the high turbidity values at Stations 1, 2, 8, ECU -2A and ECU -7C. Additional parameters that were measured but do not have water quality standards under Minn. R. Ch. 7050 include: discharge (Table 12), suspended solids (Table 13), nitrate- nitrogen (Table 14), and total phosphorus (Table 15). 206495.wpd E -24 Table 5. 1998 Chloride- -Nine Mile Creek Chloride, mg /L Station 04 -Mar 02 -Apr 14 -May 01 -Jun " 01 -Jul 03 -Aug 10 -Sep 01 -Oct Mean 1 150:: 100 98 79 77 24 220 71 102 Qn 2 NO 110 96 52 88 52 120 83 105 3 55 44 61 52 50 19 •• 47 4 220,; °.% 100 120 74 57 39 F 330 95 129 5 100 92 78 73 41 80 69 80 6 110 90 100 75 75 58 75 62 81 7 130 ,. 99 98 91 54 49 60 82 83 8 110 97 80 53 15 64 77 78 Indicates greater than the Minn. R. Chapter 7050 water quality standard of 100 mg/L for Class 3B (industrial consumption) Indicates greater than the Minn. R. Chapter 7050 water quality standard of 230 mg/L for Class 2B (aquatic life) No samples collected. P:12312 =319MILESTRITABLES 11998198- TBLS.WB2 N o+ Table 6. 1998 Specific Conductance - -Nine Mile Creek Conductivity, pmho /cm @ 25 °C Station 04 -Mar 02 -Apr 14 -May 0.1 -Jun 01 -Jul 03 -Aug 10 -Sep 01 -Oct Mean 1 1200 801 955 752 751 225 .1369, `` 825 860 2 1450 726 943 624 668 443 1039 788 835 3 620 550 660 534 541 539 ' 574 4 1211 612 865 503 418 293 1516.` 587 751 5 710 593 701 547 507 337 628 565 574 6 790 594 696 527 527 438 636 576 598 7 943 603 651 578 434 356 531 658 594 8 936 627 676 531 475 156 633 679 589 ECU -2 1570 684 857 493 563 379 972 687 776 ECU -2A 1340 730 910 587 598 400 938 750 782 ECU -3A 620 550 660 534 541 539 ' 574 ECU -5A 755 597 679 536 519 454 615 552 588 ECU -7A 930 625 651 562 450 404 530 643 599 ECU -713 945 641 656 565 455 248 561 676 593 ECU -7C 960 641 675 526 460 155 644 688 594 . Indicates greater than the Minn. R. Chapter 7050 water quality standard of 1000 pmho /cm @25 °C for Class 4A (irrigation) " No samples collected. 1 P:\23\27\003\9MILESTR\TABLES\1998\98-TBLS.WB2 N V Table 7. 1998 Dissolved Oxygen - -Nine Mile Creek Dissolved Oxygen, mg /L Station 04 -Mar 02 -Apr 14 -May 01 -Jun 01 -Jul 03 -Aug 10 -Sep 01 -Oct Mean 1 8.6 9.4 6.5 6.4 5.0 9.3 8.7 7.3 2 10.9 10.9 6.9 7.0 6.5 7.0 6.7 8.2 8.0 3 9.2 9.8 2 6 5.2 1 5 1 0 .`::. .. .. 4.9 4 7.2 8.2 4.2 :` 4 11.. ". 28 ;: 4.2;; 4.2 5 10.3 9.4 5.6 3.8 2.2 ':0 5.6... 5.5 6 10.4 9.4 7:., 0 5.2 4 9 .> 6.0 6.4 7.7 7.1 7 9.7 8.4 48 38 .' 04:.` 2.8 '' ... 30.. 6.5 4.9 8 12.6 10.6 8.0 7.7 70 74 7.0 9.2 8.7 ECU -2 11.3 9.7 6.7 5.6 4 2 4'6 =.. 6.6 6.8 6.9 ECU -2A 10.8 10.8 6.9 6.3 5.8 6.6 6.5 7.5 7.7 ECU -3A 9.2 9.8 2:6. 5.2 4.9 ECU -5A 9.8 9.0 8.0 3 7 :' 2 9 1.0 4.5 5.5 5.6 ECU -7A 10.2 7.4 5.7 5.0 19 4.5 409 7.0 5.8 ECU -713 11.1 8.5 6.3 6.4 3 7 7.2 7.1 8.6 7.4 ECU -7C 12.4 10.3 8.0 7.9 7.2 8.1 8.1 11.1 9.1 Indicates less than the Minn. R. Chapter 7050 water quality standard of 5 mg/L for Class 2B waters No samples collected. PA23127\00319MILESTRWABLEV 998198- TBLS.wB2 Table 8. 1998 Fecal coliform bacteria--Nine Mile Creek Fecal coliform, colonies/100 mL Station 04-Mar 02-Apr 1.4-May 01-Jun - 01-Jul 03-Aug 10 -Sep 01-Oct Mean P.�23\27\003\9MILESTR\TABLES\lgga\ga-TBLS.WB2 21 1 1 120 1 RV 00 2 1 1 180 ...... . .... 130 3 14 22 16 130 33 0* 03, 4 8 1 9 20 100 9-45!: 5 74 2 43 77i 604 6 1 7 58 'a, 6 072 ��,l 2001, 7 5 1 89 _J`06,*�- 190 84 34 200 60,9' - 8 1 1 94 120 '3 8 Indicates greater than the Minn. R. Chapter 7050 water quality standard of 200 colonles/1 OOmL for Class 2 (aquatic life) TNTC: To numerous to count. Greater than 3400 fecal coliform colonies/100 ml. No sample collected. P.�23\27\003\9MILESTR\TABLES\lgga\ga-TBLS.WB2 Table 9. 1998 pH- -Nine Mile Creek pH, Standard Units Station 04 -Mar 02 -Apr 14 -May 01 -Jun 01 -Jul 03 -Aug 10 -Sep 01 -Oct Mean 1 7.3 7.4 7.6 7.7 7.4 7.4 7.8 7.3 7.5 2 7.3 7.3 7.7 7.4 7.2 7.3 7.4 7.0 7.3 3 7.2 7.5 7.3 7.6 7.5 7.2 ' 7.4 4 6.9 7.6 7.4 7.7 7.6 7.3 7.5 7.3 7.4 5 7.3 7.5 7.8 7.5 7.5 7.4 7.4 6.9 7.4 6 7.3 7.4 7.7 7.0 7.2 7.2 7.6 7.0 7.3 7 7.0 7.1 7.5 6.8 6 1: 7.6 7.2 7.3 7.1 8 7.3 6.7 7.6 7.2 6.01. ' 5 7 ".. 7.3 7.3 6.9 ECU -2 7.5 7.4 7.7 7.3 7.5 7.4 7.8 7.1 7.5 ECU -2A 7.2 7.3 7.5 7.1 6.8 7.2 7.3 7.1 7.2 ECU -3A 7.2 7.5 7.3 7.6 7.5 7.2 7.4 ECU -5A 7.3 7.5 7.9 7.8 7.5 7.4 7.5 6.9 7.5 ECU -7A 7.0 7.0 7.4 6.7; 7.1 7.4 7.2 7.0 ECU -7B 7.3 5.8 7.2 6.7 6.9 5 7:. 7.2 7.3 6.8 ECU -7C 7.7 5.9 7.0 7.0 7.4 6.5 7.1 7.3 7.0 Indicates a value that is greater than or less than the Minn. R. Chapter 7050 water quality standard of 6.5 -8.5 standard units. No sample collected. PA 23\27\0031 9MILESTRWABLES11998198- TBL5.WB2 3, w 0 Table 10. 1998 Temperature - -Nine Mile. Creek Temperature, degrees F Station 04 -Mar 02 -Apr 14 -May 01 -Jun 01 -Jul 03 -Aug 10 -Sep 01 -Oct Mean 1 42 42 64 63 68 68 61 56 58 2 39 41 62 61 69 68 59 54 57 3 32 38 63 59 68 66 ' 54 4 34 37 61 59 68 66 58 52 54 5 38 41 65 64 73 68 64 55 59 6 36 41 64 64 72 69 62 55 58 7 36 41 62 63 72 70 65 55 58 8 34 41 63 63 71 68 62 53 57 ECU -2 36 40 64 62 70 67 65 54 57 ECU -2A 38 41 61 61 70 68 61 54 57 ECU -3A 32 38 63 59 68 66 ' 54 ECU -5A 36 41 66 65 74 70 63 56 59 ECU -7A 34 41 63 64 72 69 . 65 54 58 ECU -76 33 41 65 64 72 68 66 54 58 ECU -7C 34 41 64 64 71 68 62 53 57 No readings obtained. P:\23\27\003\9MILESTR\TABLES\1998\98-TBLS.WB2 Table 11. 1998 Turbidity- -Nine Mile Creek Turbidity, NTU Station 04 -Mar 02 -Apr 14 -May 01 -Jun 01 -Jul 03 -Aug 10 -Sep 01 -Oct Mean w 1 ~ 13.6 18.2 23.1 11.0 20.1 142.0.: 6.2 8.0 30.3 2 12.8 15.8 11.8 14.2 23.5 41 :0 :. 13.6 11.8 16.1 3 2.0 2.5 1.0 1.9 1.7 18.0 4.5 4 7.0 2.5 3.5 2.7 3.9 9.0 3.1 11.0 5.3 5 10.2 10.5 5.0 7.7 3.3 11.0 4.6 4.9 7.2 6 8.1 15.5 5.0 13.5 6.8 12.0 10.0 9.5 10.1 7 10.5 9.7 7.5 4.6 4.5 7.0 8.5 7.5 7.5 8 8.9 24.5 6.3 8.5 11.0 40 0 : ; : 3.5 5.0 13.5 ECU -2 13.9 15.5 12.5 11.1 17.5 10.7 11.0 17.5 ECU -2A 13.8 16.0 13.5 13.5 24.5 42.0 ' 12.5 11.5 18.4 ECU -3A 2.0 2.5 1.0 1.9 1.7 18.0 ' 4.5 ECU -5A 6.2 11.8 4.3 7.6 4.6 22.0 2.9 6.0 8.2 ECU -7A 10.0 1-3.5 6.7 4.2 7.1 7.0 5.0 6.0 7.4 ECU -713 9.2 15.5 8.3 5.9 7.1 15.2 3.9 3.8 8.6 ECU -7C 8.9 16.3 8.5 7.7 10.0 54.0 4.0 4.9 14.3 Indicates greater than the Minn. R. Chapter 7050 water quality standard of 25 NTU for Class 2B (aquatic life) P:\23\27\003\gMILESTR\TABLES\1998\98-TBLS.WR2 Table 12. 1998 Discharge - -Nine Mile Creek Discharge, cfs Station 04 -Mar 02 -Apr 14 -May 01 -Jun 01 -Jul 03 -Aug 10 -Sep 01 -Oct Mean P:M2 2M3WMILESTR \TABLES \1998\98- TBL5.WB2 N 1 2.5 7.8 3.0 3.7 3.3 22.4 2.6 2.2 5.9 2 7.7 42.4 6.2 8.1 6.4 30.2 3.5 4.1 13.6 3 1.0 4.6 0.4 0.6 1.2 0.7 0.0 0.0 1.4 4 0.01 0.90 0.01 0.10 0.02 1.60 0.00 0.10 0.3 5 6.6 33.1 2.5 1.1 7.2 4.9 0.6 6.7 7.8 6 6.6 37.6 4.5 15.1 9.4 6.9 2.6 9.0 11.5 7 24.0 173.1 11.1 26.6 49.9 14.6 4.4 11.2 39.4 8 29.1 17.8 31.7 64.4 38.2 7.9 9.1 24.8 ECU -2 4.6 26.1 3.4 5.9 6.7 29.3 2.5 2.6 10.1 ECU -2A 7.9 37.4 7.4 11.2 14.1 38.4 5.7 7.0 16.1 ECU -3A 1.0 4.6 0.4 0.6 1.2 0.7 0.0 0.0 1.1 ECU -5A 7.0 33.0 4.0 19.2 10.6 9.5 2.0 9.4 11.8 ECU -7A 22.7 190.2 17.7 31.0 68.3 13.1 6.3 10.3 45.0 ECU -713 21.6 16.8 27.3 79.6 13.0 6.0 7.7 21.5 ECU -7C 22.4 142.8 16.4 26.4 97.1 42.6 6.2 8.7 45.3 No discharge measurement obtained. Unsafe flow conditions. P:M2 2M3WMILESTR \TABLES \1998\98- TBL5.WB2 I— Table 13. 1998 Suspended Solids- -Nine Mile Creek Suspended Solids, mg /L Station 04 -Mar 02 -Apr 14 -May 01 -Jun 01 -Jul 03 -Aug 10 -Sep 01 -Oct Mean w 1 10 13 24 11 27 120 8 8 28 2 12 13 14 13 22 59 <5 8 18 3 6 <5 <5 <5 <5 8 6 4 7 <5 8 5 11 6 23 18 10 5 15 12 6 9 8 8 6 5 9 6 7 13 8 14 11 14 8 16 16 7 <5 9 12 6 8 10 9 8 8 8 <5. <5 12 14 20 44 <5 <5 14 Minn. R. Chapter 7050 has no water quality standard for suspended solids in Class 2 waters No samples collected. P:123\27100319M ILESTRITABLES \1998198 -TBLS. WB2 Table 14. 1998 Nitrate - nitrogen - -Nine Mile Creek Nitrate- nitrogen, mg /L Station 04 -Mar 01 -Jul 01 -Oct Mean 1 1.10 0.63 0.67 0.80 2 0.65 0.38 0.48 0.50 3 0.28 0.02 t 0.15 4 1.40 0.04 0.13 0.52 5 0.31 0.02 0.03 0.12 6 0.39 0.04 0.06 0.16 7 0.54 0.02 0.03 0.20 8 0.60 0.06 0.40 0.35 Minn. R. Chapter 7050 has no water quality standard for nitrate in Class 2 waters " No sample collected. Table 15. 1998 Total Phosphorus -Nine Mile Creek Total Phosphorus, mg /L Station 04 -Mar 01 -Jul 01 -Oct Mean 1 0.034 0.074 0.118 0.075 2 0.061 0.139 0.074 0.091 t , 3 0.087 0.139 t 0.113 4 0.036 0.202 0.197 0.145 5 0.060 0.123 0.068 0.084 3 6 0.049 0.110 0.050 0.070 " . 7 0.043 0.237 0.082 0.121 8 0.051 0.234 0.056 0.114 Minn. R. Chapter 7050 has no water quality standard for phosphorus in Class 2 waters No sample collected. PA23\27\00319MILESTRWABLESM 998\98- TBL5.WB2 E -34 w Table 16 Mean Annual Values for Stream Quality Parameters - 1968 -1998 (Continued) Station 2 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1962 Chlorides, mg /L 38 67 64 82 69 95 97 70 53 55 68 70 69 46 54 Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L 5.8 7.3 6.6 8.4 7.6 7.7 8.0 8.8 9.8 8.6 8.2 8.7 8.5 8.1 9.4 Fecal Coliform, col. /100 mL 1400 -- - 374 83 375 151 449 4,700 320 310 630 330 340 210 Nitrates as N, mg/L 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.4 1.0 1.2 0.7 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.6 PH - 7.5 7.6 7.4 7.6 7.6 7.3 7.8 7.8 7.7 7.8 7.7 7.6 7.9 7.9 7.8 Specific Conductance, Nmho /cm @ 25 °C - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- 660 610 650 560 640 Suspended Solids, mg/L 505 16 - 22 22 27 26 24 18 24 14 36 13 13 16 Temperature OF 65 56 - 56 57 50 48 51 55 55 57 55 57 57 57 Total Phosphorus, mg/L 1.4 0.522 1.5 0.118 0.127 0.1 0.122 0.074 0.08 0.24 0.10 - 0.18 0.16 0.13 0.17 Turbidity, NTU 27 -- - -- - -- - -- 9.8 9.7 8.3 21 7.8 8.6 7.6 Discharge, cis - 3.5 _ 12.4 6.8 8.7 14.4 5.3 10.3 13.6 Station 2 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 Chlorides, mg/L 65 56 45 74 85 76 127 72 114 . 86 97 88 89 112 139 105 Dissolved Oxygen, mg /L 9.0 8.9 9.2 9.2 8.9 8.3 7.9 9.5 9.3 9.0 9.5 8.9 8.1 8.2 8.0 8.0 Fecal Coliform, col. /100 mL 540 430 2,450 280 240' 366 665 245 232 421 369 754 2,013 506 476 473' Nitrates as N, mg/L 0.6 1.0 0.3 1.4 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.45 0.5 PH 7.8 7.7 7.5 7.7 7.9 7.7 7.8 7.6 8.0 7.6 7.9 7.6 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.3 Specific Conductance, Nmho /cm @ 25 °C 630 600 600 580 710 737 734 727 890 759 682 671 686 864 949 835 Suspended Solids, mg/L 10 15 9 17 9 8 14 7 12 9 11 16 27 9 13 18 Temperature, OF 59 56 59 61 60 59 59 58 57 56 56 61 57 54 56 57 Total Phosphorus, mg/L 0.08 0.54 0.27 0.27 0.08 0.08 0.06 0.15 0.08 0.05 0.10 0.13 0.10 0.09 0.07 0.09 Turbidity, NTU 7.7 9.2 5.2 8.3 7.3 6.9 6.8 6.6 7.2 8.5 8.4 9.4 9.7 11.3 15.5 18.1 Discharge, cis - -- - 24 4.1 4.0 6.5 3.5 5.4 12.4 6.8 8.7 14.4 5.3 10.3 13.6 Mean does not include the concentration on 6117 /87 and 8/3/98 when fecal coliform organisms were too numerous to count. wp, �� , E -: 4 e w 0o Table 16 Mean Annual Values for Stream Quality Parameters - 1968 -1998 (Continued) r Station 3 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 Chlorides, mg /L 36 26 28 27 32 37 31 26 36 30 29 30 41 33 27 Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L 5.6 5.8 6.8 8.7 10.8 8.9 7.6 7.9 9.2 9.8 6.2 10.1 92 8.1 10.6 Fecal Coliform, col. /100 mL 1400 -- -- 338 2 150 119 202 <10 180 120 330 40 360 50 Nitrates as N, mg/L 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.5 1.1- 1.2 0.6 0.9 1.0 1.3 0.4 0.5 0.3' 0.1- 1.3' pH 7.6 7.5 7.7 7.6 7.7 7.3 7.8 8.1 7.7 7.6 7.4 7.4 7.7 8.0 7.7 Specific Conductance, pmho /cm @ - -- - -- -- -- - -- -- -- - -- 480 480 410 25 °C 555 507 536 650 "" 680 574 Suspended Solids, mg/L 4 25 6 8 10 5 30 4 Suspended Solids, mg/L 529 - - 21 5 10 11 39 12 12 4 5 6 3,030 70 Temperature, IF 61 47 - 56 69 48 54 58 54 45 52 61 54 63 54 Total Phosphorus, mg/L 0.7 0.342 0.425 0.039 0.087 0.142 0.072 0.181 <0.10 <0.10 0.1 0.26 0.20 0.10 0.43 Turbidity, NTU 23 -- -- -- - -- - -- 2.4 5.0 2.9 3.9 3.1 500 34 Discharge, cis _ 0.8 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.5 1.0 1.8 "" 0.5 1.4 Station 3 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1986 1969' 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 19982 Chlorides, mg/L 26 23 43 63 33 35 39 39 20 33 62 43 54 68 75 47 Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L 9.2 7.2 7.3 6.8 5.6 6.3 8.1 8.4 8.6 8.4 7.3 7.5 5.1 7.9 "" 5.0 4.9 Fecal Coliform, col. /100 mL <20 200 80 40 610" 1,120 10 220 267 53 314 808 1,501 69 "" 281 43- Nitrates as N, mg/L 0.3" 6.0' 0.2 0.2 0.1" 0.5' -- 0.1' -- 0.4" 0.3" 0.1" 0.1" 0.2' 024 02 pH 7.6 7.5 7.3 7.7 7.7 7.7 8.1 7.5 7.8 7.7 7.9 7.4 7.0 7.4 "" 7.3 7.4 Specific Conductance, limho /cm @ 25 °C 460 484 450 540 540 481 504 439 431 390 555 507 536 650 "" 680 574 Suspended Solids, mg/L 4 25 6 8 10 5 30 4 9 2 7 6.4 40 5"" 7 6 Temperature, IF 55 56 52 62 61 47 63 62 54 47 58 60 58 44 "" 53 54 Total Phosphorus, mg/L 0.03 0.29' 0.08 0.13 0.11" 0.03' -- 0.21 - 0.06 0.08 0.06" 0.07" 0.16' 0.10 0.11" Turbidity, NTU 1.7 12 2.6 6.9 6.9 4.0 52 1.2 1.4 1.8 2.5 22 16.2 3.1 "" 10.5 4.5 Discharge, cis - -- - 0.9 0.2 <0.1 0.8 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.5 1.0 1.8 "" 0.5 1.4 'Only one sample was collected. "Only two samples were collected. Mean does not include the concentration on 6/17/87 and 8/3)98 when fecal coliform organisms were too numerous to count. Value represents mean of four samplings/monitodng dates. ' Values represent sampling data on 5/11/89, creek was dry or had no flow on all other dates. 2Value represents mean of six sampling /monitoring dates 206495.wpd E -38 1- Table 16 Mean Annual Values for Stream Quality Parameters - 1968 -1998 (Continued) Station 4 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977. 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 Chlorides, mg/L 2888 396 548 267 366 292 269 150 790 145 88 172 160 34 52 Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L 6.0 8.4 7.4 7.4 6.3 7.2 6.3 7.0 6.0 9.4 7.3 6.4 9.3 5.7 8.6 Fecal Coliform, col. /100 mL 1940 -- - 86 189 242 41 126 40 1,080 40 180 <10 560 30 Nitrates as N, mg/L 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.7 1.5 1.9 1.4 2.2 1.8 1.6 2.2 0.9" 1.9' 1.0' PH 7.3 7.4 7.2 7.5 7.5 7.2 7.4 7.6 7.4 7.6 7.5 7.5 7.6 7.7 7.4 Specific Conductance, pmho /cm @ 25 °C - -- - 9 7 8 49 19 <10 <5 8 5 9 9 30 5 "' 7 10 Temperature, IF 46 52 50 -- - -- - -- - -- - -- 990 440 600 Suspended Solids, mg/L 4950 - - 13 19 34 23 14 11 10 5 5 2 6 11 Temperature, IF 62 3.5 - 52 57 45 47 54 39 52 55 50 45 54 46 Total Phosphorus, mg/L 1.8 1.39 1.22 0.762 0.324 0.438 0.353 0.508 0.19 0.13 <0.1 0.20 0.26" 0.23' 0.19' Turbidity, NTU 36 -- -- 2 Mean does not include the concentration on 6/1/98 and 8/3/98 when fecal coliform organisms were too numerous to count. -- - -- - -- - -- -- -- 2.6 4.7 3.4 Discharge, ofs _ C+1 Station 4 r 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990' 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 Chlorides, mg/L 99 36 32 45 32 -- 43 29 58 98 86 187 80 130 399 129 Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L 8.3 6.9 6.4 6.7 6.3 10.1 5.0 4.5 6.0 7.1 6.1 4.9 4.2 7.6 "' 4.8 4.2 Fecal Coliform, col. 1100 mL 30 290 220 140 10 <10 <10 20 52 179 262 2,422 5,839 83 "' 634 1262 Nitrates as N, mg/L 8.2' 3.7' 0.8 3.0 - 1.0" - - -- 1.5" 0.7' 0.1' 0.1" 1.0" 0.78 .52 PH 7.3 7.5 7.3 7.6 7.8 7.5 7.6 7.8 7.8 7.7 7.8 7.0 7.0 7.3 "' 7.1 7.4 Specific Conductance, Nmho /cm @ 25 °C 804 530 490 540 560 483 393 432 569 1529 635 808 556 782 "' 1691 751 Suspended Solids, mg/L 6 9 7 8 49 19 <10 <5 8 5 9 9 30 5 "' 7 10 Temperature, IF 46 52 50 59 68 35 52 55 50 47 53 53 56 44 "' 54 54 Total Phosphorus, mg/L 0.09' 0.18' 0.25 0.24 - 0.16" - - - 0.03" 0.11' 0.17' 0.06" 0.18" 0.10 0.14 Turbidity, NTU 1.3 11 6.0 9.6 16 16 0.7 0.5 3.5 5.1 4.4 5.7 3.8 4.1 "' 10.9 5.3 Discharge, cis - - - 0.1 <0.1 <0.1 0.2 <0.1 <0.1 0.03 0.2 0.6 2.0 0.2 "' 0.3 0.3 ' Only two samples were collected. "Only one sample was collected. "' Value represents mean of four sampling /monitoring dates. ' Values represent sampling data on 6/6/90; creek was dry or had no (low conditions on all other dates. 2 Mean does not include the concentration on 6/1/98 and 8/3/98 when fecal coliform organisms were too numerous to count. 5.wj t } E- t�1 O Table 16 Mean Annual Values for Stream Quality Parameters -1968 -1998 (Continued) Station 5 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 Chlorides, mg/L 127 120 89 106 77 89 142 62 98 82 58 59 60 49 58 Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L 4.4 6.3 7.5 7.6 6.3 7.4 6.6 6.0 8.3 6.0 4.7 4.9 3.6 2.6 5.8 Fecal Coliform, col. /100 mL 980 -- - 118 75 180 56 387 280 370 220 380 100 220 100 Nitrates as N, mg/L 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.5 0.9 0.9 0.8 1.4 0.5 0.6 0.1 1.0 0.2 -- 0.2 0.2 pH 7.5 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.4 7.7 7.9 7.6 7.7 7.5 7.3 7.5 7.6 7.6 Specific Conductance, limho /cm @ 25 °C - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- 600 550 560 910 540 Suspended Solids, mg/L 865 -- - 22 18 24 17 16 18 9 4 17 7 7 7 Temperature, °F 67 12 - 59 59 49 49 54 55 55 59 59 54 61 55 Total Phosphorus, mg/L 1.7 0.417 1.19 0.099 0.127 0.123 0.152 0.112 0.10 0.16 0.10 0.24 0.17" 0.17 0.23 Turbidity, NTU 41 -- - -- - -- - -- 6.8 4.4 2.3 12 3.3 6.1 4.5 Discharge, cis _ 1.6 4.9 5.3 4.7 3.6 6.0 6.4 7.2 Discharge, ds - -- - 12 1.3 Station 5 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 Chlorides, mg /L 43 67 62 58 44 89 67 68 56 72 117 69 84 94 119 80 Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L 4.7 6.1 6.6 7.3 6.8 7.7 5.0 4.5 4.5 6.5 9.0 6.8 6.2 5.6 5.3 5.5 Fecal Coliform, col. /100 mL 250 160 560 70 280 73 142 51 323 289 <10 262 562 80 178 1931 i Nitrates as N, mg/L 0.1- 0.4 -- 0.1 0.7 0.2 0.3 -- 0.1- 0.1 -- 0.1 -- 0.1 0.2- 0.1- 0.1 0.2 02 0.1 pH 7.5 7.6 7.3 7.8 7.8 7.7 71 7.4 7.8 7.6 8.0 7.5 7.4 7.4 7.3 7.4 Specific Conductance, pmho /cm @ 25 °C 520 540 520 440 420 602 473 527 543 491 825 486 543 702 759 574 Suspended Solids, mg/L 8 40 5 8 5 10 <10 10 10 5 7 12 9 9 9 9 Temperature, °F 54 58 58 60 61 55 64 59 58 58 38 65 59 56 58 59 Total Phosphorus, mg/L 0.04- 0.08" 0.22 0.09 0.12 0.11-- 0:11 0.19 0.10" 0.11 0.07 -- 0.09- 0.09 0.11 0.08 0.08 Turbidity, NTU 2.1 15 4.0 12 3.9 5.4 2.1 2.9 1.6 4.9 5.3 4.7 3.6 6.0 6.4 7.2 Discharge, ds - -- - 12 1.3 1.2 2.4 2.8 1.8 8.0 4.8 5.4 4.4 3.0 4.0 7.8 Only one sample was collected. Only two samples were collected. Mean does not include the concentration on 8/3/98 when fecal coliform organisms were too numerous to count. 206495.wpd E -40 r 4.- Table 16 Mean Annual Values for Stream Quality Parameters - 1968 -1998 (Continued) Station 6 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 Chlorides, mg/L 105 98 83 116 82 80 94 76 50 70 59 73 68 47 52 Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L 5.8 7.6 8.8 9.0 8.4 8.4 8.1 7.5 7.9 6.2 6.4 8.0 7.2 3.7 5.3 Fecal Coliform, col. /100 mL 1140 -- - 1,527 152 432 104 304 237 440 60 270 110 110 100 Nitrates as N, mg/L 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.5 0.7 0.8 0.5 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2" 0.1 0.3 pH 7.6 7.6 7.4 7.7 7.7 7.5 7.9 8.0 7.6 7.8 7.5 7.8 7.7 7.6 7.5 Specific Conductance, Nmho /cm @ 25 °C - -- - -- Specific Conductance, Nmho /cm @ 25 °C 535 530 570 470 521 556 515 563 567. 568 605 523 599 766 779 - Suspended Solids, mg/L - - - 5 600 600 570 520 550 Suspended Solids, mg/L 595 9 - 20 22 16 14 8 18 22 2 8 8 6 11 Temperature, IF 67 54 - 56 58 48 48 49 57 57 57 55 57 59 55 Total Phosphorus, mg/L 1.5 0.44 0.33 0.10 0.16 0.16 0.12 0.08 <0.10 0.14 <010 0.10 0.15" 0.16 0.25 Turbidity, NTU 27 -- - -- 3.2 3.4 7.1 7.0 10.1 Discharge, cfs -- -- - 16 1.3 1.3 4.4 6.2 6.5 4.1 - -- - -- - -- - -- 3.0 5.2 2.6 Discharge, cfs _ Station 6 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1986 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997. 1998 Chlorides, mg/L 58 54 68 61 52 77 68 71 59 76 94 73 90 113 119 80 Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L 6.0 5.5 7.0 7.2 6.8 8.0 82 8.2 8.6 9.3 9.1 8.8 7.3 7.4 7.1 7.1 Fecal Coliform, coIJ100 mL 90 1,060 670 110 340 178 151 104 237 161 193 637 492 347 247 2951 Nitrates as N, mg/L 0.1 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2" 0.2" 0.1" 0.08 ". 0.14 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.29 0.16 PH 7.6 7.6 7.4 7.7 7.7 7.8 7.9 7.4 7.9 7.9 7.8 7.7 7.5 7.5 7.4 7.3 Specific Conductance, Nmho /cm @ 25 °C 535 530 570 470 521 556 515 563 567. 568 605 523 599 766 779 598 Suspended Solids, mg/L 8 8 4 5 11 7 12 8 9 8 10 9 11 7 10 16 Temperature, IF 59 57 59 62 62 54 65 61 59 60 54 63 58 55 58 58 Total Phosphorus, mg/L 0.12 0.13 0.31 0.13 0.11 0.08" 0.11 0.12 0.05" 0.07 0.12 0.10 0.07 0.11 0.06 0.07 Turbidity, NTU 3.3 5.9 3.7 2.7 5.1 6.2 4.1 2.8 3.1 7.4 3.8 3.2 3.4 7.1 7.0 10.1 Discharge, cfs -- -- - 16 1.3 1.3 4.4 6.2 6.5 4.1 7.7 5.0 5.8 4.2 8.5 11.5 The high average was due to a concentration of 7,500 colonies/100 mL on 9/19/84. " Only two samples were collected Mean does not Include the concentration on 6/1/98 and 8/3/98 when fecal colifonn organisms were too numerous to count. E f ) T { i N ? 1 Table 16 Mean Annual Values for Stream Quality Parameters - 1968 -1998 (Continued) Station 7 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 Chlorides, mg/L 75 82 73 69 62 84 75 82 48 61 73 92 68 53 66 Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L 5.6 5.6 7.0 6.7 5.3 5.2 6.4 6.4 7.2 4.6 4.5 6.5 4.8 3.3 4.2 Fecal Coliform, col. /100 mL 1221 -- -- 166 110 210 81 230 340 140 260 1,100 420 120 60 Nitrates as N, mg/L 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.9 0.7 0.4 0.8 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2' 0.1 0.3 pH 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.4 7.8 7.8 7.6 7.7 7.5 7.6 7.7 7.7 7.4 Specific Conductance, pmho /cm @ 25 °C - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- 560 530 570 Suspended Solids, mg/L 620 - -- 18 19 9.4 11 16 15 11 10 19 9 4 9 Temperature, °F 67 12 - 55 58 50 48 50 54 57 59 ' 57 57 61 55 Total Phosphorus, mg/L 1.7 0.84 0.306 0.111 0.124 0.107 0.109 0.098 0.12 0.50 0.10 0.14 0.21' 0.21 0.16 Turbidity, NTU 27 -- - -- - -- - -- 8.7 5.9 6.6 12 4.2 4.8 3.6 Discharge, cfs _ 3.7 8.9 4.7 4.1 3.7 7.0 8.6 7.5 Discharge, cfs - -- - 84 0.6 7.2 11.6 13.7 24.7 9.4 34.0 15.3 21.7 14.2 24.4 39.4 Station 7 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 Chlorides, mg/L 57 61 54 69 68 97 60 56 48 79 98 78 114 116 124 83 Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L 4.3 3.7 5.0 5.1 4.9 5.5 4.2 5.1 5.1 6.5 7;1 6.8 5.8 5.0 52 4.9 Fecal Colifonn, col. /100 mL 310 180 510 80 77 94 208 99 320 211 582 211 376 132 125 2101 Nitrates as N, mg/L 0.2 0.3 0.1 0.6 0.1' 0.2" 0.2' 0.03' 0.03' 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 pH 7.3 7.4 7.2 7.5 7.7 7.6 7.7 72 7.9 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.3 7.2 72 7.1 Specific Conductance, pmho /cm @ 25 °C 520 510 520 540 520 579 486 461 452 558 624 517 598 721 747 594 Suspended Solids, mg/L 7 6 5 7 9 5 <10 7 10 13 13 12 10 7 13 8 Temperature, °F 59 56 58 62 59 55 62 59 58 58 56 62 58 56 57 58 Total Phosphorus, mg/L 0.13 0.12 0.25 0.12 0.08' 0.07" 0.08 0.14 0.14' 0.10 0.11 0.10 0.06 0.11 0.08 0.12 Turbidity, NTU 3.3 4.0 . 3.9 2.7 3.9 3.1 3.3 2.7 3.7 8.9 4.7 4.1 3.7 7.0 8.6 7.5 Discharge, cfs - -- - 84 0.6 7.2 11.6 13.7 24.7 9.4 34.0 15.3 21.7 14.2 24.4 39.4 Only two samples were collected. Only one sample was collected. Mean does not include the concentrations on 8/3/98 when fecal coliform organisms were too numerous to count. 206495.wpd E -42 Table 16, Mean Annual Values for Stream Quality Parameters- 1968 -1998 (Continued) Station 8 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1962 Chlorides, mg/L 47 73 61 80 55 71 66 68 50 53 68 82 60 65 64 Dissolved Oxygen, mg /L 6.5 9.1 10 10 9.7 10.1 10.3 9.9 10.3 9.4 9.1 10.0 9.8 9.2 10.4 Fecal:Coliform, col. /100 mL 205 -- -- 1,247 110 248 163 231 4,700 440 590 600 570 460 360 Nitrates as N, mg/L 0.4 0.56 0.26 0.48 1.16 1.18 1.09 1.1 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.2' 0.2 0.3 PH 7.5 7.6 7.5 7.8 7.7 7.6 8.1 8.1 7.9 . 8.0 7.8 7.8 8.1 8.0 8.1 Specific Conductance, pmho /cm @ 25 °C - - - - . - 570 580 540 540 580 Suspended Solids, mg/L 630 - 20 13 14 11 16 20 12 12 18 6 12 13 Temperature, °F 60 - 55 56 48 48 49 52 54 57 57 54 57 52 Total Phosphorus, mg/L 1.1 1.1 0.37 0.09 0.09 0.11 0.11 0.07 0.15 0.48 <0.10 0.12 0.14' 0.17 0.13 Turbidity, NTU 74 -- - _ - - - 3.1 5.4 4.0 Discharge, cfs _ _ ty Station 8 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 -1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 Chlorides, mg/L 55 56 63 76 59 78 88 59 74 73 94 76 90 112 115 78 w Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L 9.8 9.8 9.5 9.1 10:7 9.9 9.0 10.4 9.9 10.6 10.2 9.4 8.8 9.1 8.9 8.7 Fecal Coliform, col. /100 mL 455 380 5,960 310 1,140' 235 550 288 216 300 457 1,174 - 6,280 476 414 488 Nitrates as N, mg/L <0.2 0.4 0.2 0.4 0.7 0.2 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.35 0.35 pH 8.0 .7.8 7.6 7.8 8.0 7.8 7.9 7.8 8.0 7.9 8.0 8.0 7.6 7.5 7.4 6.9 Specific Conductance, {mho /cm @ 25 °C 520 490 530 510 5.40 633 589 515 622 565 645 531 613 764 757 589 Suspended Solids, mg/L 10 19 18 16 27 6 12 8 46 9 12 29 19 6 12 14 Temperature, °F 55 54 54 59 55 56 57 54 54 56 56 60 56 53 56 57 Total Phosphorus, mg/L 0.21 0.09 0.17 0.12 0.07 0.10 0.09 0.10 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.10 0.05 0.09 • 0.08 0.11 Turbidity, NTU 3.5 7.0 5.1 5.4 7.0 3.1 2.7 2.4 33 7.1 4.7 7.1 5.2 5.5 7.1 13.5 Discharge, cfs - - 97 8.2 3.2 19.7 41.7 42.5 17.7 35.4 22.7 25.2 15.8 28.2 24.8 Only two samples were collected. r Table 16 Mean Annual Values for Stream Quality Parameters - 1968 -1998 (Continued) 8,7 9,1 pH, Standard Units Station ECU -2 1997 1998 Station ECU -2A 1997 1998 Station ECU-3A 1997 19981 Dissolved Oxygen, mg /L 7.0 6.9 Dissolved Oxygen, mg /L 7.7 7.7 Dissolved Oxygen, mg/L 5.0 4.9 pH, Standard Units 7.6 7.5 pH, Standard Units 7.4 7.2 pH, Standard Units 7.3' 7.4 Specific Conductance, Nmho /cm @ 25 °C 1016 776 Specific Conductance, Nmho /cm @ 25 °C 897 782 Specific Conductance, Nmho /cm @ 25 °C 680 . 574 Temperature, IF 58 57 Temperature, IF 57 57 Temperature, IF 53 54 Turbidity, NTU 14.6 17.5 Turbidity, IITU 16.4 18.4 Turbidity, NTU 4.7 4.5 Discharge, cfs 6.2 10.1 Discharge, cis 13.4 16.1 Discharge, cfs 0.5 1.1 Station ECU -SA 1997 1998 Station ECU -7A 1997 1998. Station ECU -7B 1997 1998 Dissolved Oxygen, mg /L 5.0 5.6 Dissolved Oxygen, mg /L 6.1 5.8 Dissolved Oxygen, mg /L 7.6 7.4 pH, Standard Units 7.3 7.5 pH, Standard Units 7.2 7.0 pH, Standard Units 7.3 6.8 t+7 Specific Conductance, Nmho /cm @ 25 °C 762 588 Specific Conductance, Nmho /cm @ 25 °C 769 599 Specific Conductance, Nmho /cm @ 25 °C 792 593 Temperature, IF 59 59 Temperature, IF 57 58 Temperature, IF 57 58 Turbidity, NTU 9.2 8.2 Turbidity, NTU 8.5 7.4 Turbidity, NTU 6.9 8.6 Discharge, cis 8.7 11.8 Discharge, cfs 23.7 45.0 Discharge, cis 24.4 21.5 Station ECU -7C 1997 1998 Dissolved Oxygen, mg /L 8,7 9,1 pH, Standard Units 7.3 7.0 Specific Conductance, Nmho /cm @ 25 °C 801 594 Temperature, IF 57 57 Turbidity, NTU 9.1 14.3 Discharge, cis 27.2 45.3 1 Value represents mean of six monitoring dates 206495.wpd E -44 Chlorides and Specific Conductance. Historically, high chloride and specific conductance measurements in Nine Mile Creek have been correlated with periods of snowmelt, because of road salts present in runoff from the highways adjacent to the sampling locations and runoff from the tributary watershed. Throughout the period of record, Stations 3, 6, 7, and 8 have had lower chloride and specific conductance measurements than the other locations. Station 3 is located in a less developed area of the watershed. Station 6 is located downstream from a golf course; 1 Station 7 is located downstream from a large marsh; and Station 8 is located within a large park. These sample locations are less impacted by highway deicing than stations located adjacent to major highways, such as Stations 1, 2, and 5. Stations 1 and 5 are located adjacent to T.H. 169 and Station 2 is located adjacent to T.H. 100. Prior to 1972, high chloride values were observed at Station 4 and the data indicated that the salt storage area located south of Highway 67 in Eden Prairie was the source of the high values. The salt storage area was removed during 1972. However, residues from the salt storage area persisted for a period of time. Consequently, high chloride levels were observed at Station 4 during 1972 through 1977. Lower chloride values have been observed since 1977 with the exception of a value of 600 mg/L during March of 1994 and a value of 2,000 mg/L during March of 1997. The chloride concentration of 2,000 mg/L was less than acute toxicity levels for fish (i.e., between 8,500 and 12,000 mg/L according to Jones and Jeffrey, 1992), but within the range of acute toxicity levels of invertebrates (i.e., from 1,300 to 2,300 mg/L according to Jones and Jeffrey, 1992). During 1998, all stations observed average chloride and specific conductance values that were lower than 1997 average values. The lowest chloride and specific conductance values during the _ period of record were observed on August 3, 1998 at Station 8. The low values apparently resulted from surface runoff near the time of sample collection (i.e., 2.11 inches of precipitation occurred during August 2 -3). All other chloride and specific conductance values measured during 1998 were within the range of values measured during the period of record. 206495.wpd E -45 3W 250 Uf 1 t5o 3 aim 50 0 a 70 72 71 78 7e W � a es W SD az a OS W reran NINE MILE CREEK Station 1 ' NINE MILE CREEK Station 7 >oo 2W 150 100 50 0 _ 60 70 72 71 70 7a W W a W W 90 s2 a 96 q YEAR P:\23\27\003\9MILESTR\98RPTGR2.WB2 goo zw etso 0 x � 100 50 0 NINE MILE CREEK Station 2 031111A11111111111 NO 11MINIVE P:\23\27\003\9MILESTR\98RPTGR2.WB2 goo zw etso 0 x � 100 50 0 NINE MILE CREEK Station 2 a 7o n 71 76 7e 5o to a N N 90 02 a N W YEAR NINE MILE CREEK Station 8 X0 2W UMA STANDARD: Not to emwW 100.Gt - - - - - - - - - - - i 200 - -- - -- - -- ----- - - - - -- --- Ur vi 150 - - - - - -- - - -- - ---- �- -- -- -; - -� i 100 50 - - - - - - 0 0 70 72 71 7S 70 !0 W a W N eo S2 a SB W YEAR Figure 3 Chloride at Stations 1, 2, 7, and 8 P10 1111U, 121111 a 7o n 71 76 7e 5o to a N N 90 02 a N W YEAR NINE MILE CREEK Station 8 X0 2W UMA STANDARD: Not to emwW 100.Gt - - - - - - - - - - - i 200 - -- - -- - -- ----- - - - - -- --- Ur vi 150 - - - - - -- - - -- - ---- �- -- -- -; - -� i 100 50 - - - - - - 0 0 70 72 71 7S 70 !0 W a W N eo S2 a SB W YEAR Figure 3 Chloride at Stations 1, 2, 7, and 8 t� t V NINE MILE CREEK Station 3 300 250 �2w E 0 150 Ic O 100 so 0 68 70 72 74 76 78 8D 62 64 • 86 88 90 92 94 96 9 YEAR 200 250 2W 150 100 60 0 NINE MILE CREEK Station 5 930 865 2.350 . 68 70 .72 74 76 n 80 82 64 96 80 90 92 94 96 U YEAR E 6d IN R O V NINE MILE CREEK Station 4 7.000 IAW I.WO 7W = 5w am 1.05D wd m Y U STANDARD: "tor 100 UIWL ---- - - - - -- ------ - - -- - -- r — I , 68 70 .72 74 76 n 80 82 64 96 80 90 92 94 96 U YEAR E 6d IN R O V NINE MILE CREEK Station 4 7.000 IAW I.WO 7W = 5w am 1.05D wd m 6B 70 72 7/ 76 7B 80 82 N 88 88 90 B2 B4 88 98 YEAR NINE MILE CREEK Station 6 300 250 ----------------------------------------- YPCA STANDARD: Not to EXONd 100 1 , 8150 --- - -- -- - - -- ----------------- -- —� — s� 1 1 r , 100 ' 1 1 so- - - - -- — - -11— -- - - - -- 0 ss 70 74 74 76 78 80 82 64 86 66 eo 92 94 96 96 YEAR Figure 4 Chloride at Stations 3, 4, 5, and 6 ti. i , � 1 1 r 200 1 1 WA STANDARD: Not to E :Deed 100 mglL 1 r h 1 ' ____ __ _______ 1 _ } 1 1 __ r , 100 50 - - - -- - -- - - - -' _ T - 1 0 6B 70 72 7/ 76 7B 80 82 N 88 88 90 B2 B4 88 98 YEAR NINE MILE CREEK Station 6 300 250 ----------------------------------------- YPCA STANDARD: Not to EXONd 100 1 , 8150 --- - -- -- - - -- ----------------- -- —� — s� 1 1 r , 100 ' 1 1 so- - - - -- — - -11— -- - - - -- 0 ss 70 74 74 76 78 80 82 64 86 66 eo 92 94 96 96 YEAR Figure 4 Chloride at Stations 3, 4, 5, and 6 ti. C+7 I 00 NINE MILE CREEK Station 1 2.000 - HtAOO MPCA 67MDARC *. Not W Exceed IAOO umhoo(cm o 2s c - - - - - - - t.400 ----- - - - - -- ,J1200 -------- - - - - -- ------- ------- - - - - -- � 1AOO � O- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I I $ 600 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - Al 400 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - - --- — — — -- — — — — — — - - - N 200 - - - - - - - - - - - - 6 N 70 72 74 76 78 W 82 8/ 86 88 80 92 04 96 so YEAR NINE MILE CREEK Station 7 $000 1.800 r, I'm 1,400 Imo 1;000 � eoo Gm 400 no 0 60 70 72 71 78 70 80 82 64 86 88 tq 82 81 6ti N YEAR P:\23\27\003\9MILESTR\988PTGR2.WB2 NINE MILE CREEK Station 2 2,000 1,800 � 1,600 1,400 � too vim eoo 8 600 6W 4w N 2D0 0 68 70 72 71 76 78 80 82 81 88 M 80 B? 61 N p YEM NINE MILE CREEK Station 8 2AW 1800 -------------------------------------- Q1,600 - mpcA srANDARD: Nut to &coed I.= umhos /cm 1,400 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1AOD -- ---- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- -- -- - - -- -- - - I ' 1,000 ' I , I 600 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - % rill H �u - - --- — — — 0f200 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 68 70 72 71 76 76 60 6R er N M tp 62 IM 68 sa YEAR Figure 5 Specific Conductance at Stations 1, 2, 7, and 8 t 2,ao9 1,800 1,600 1,400 �fA00 1,000 8w 400 N 2m v 1� p 1� 1/ 1N 1,1 t $ �4 4 2 0 NINE MILE CREEK Station 3 a 70 72 74 n 78 80 a " N 66 90 92 64 98 a YEAR NINE MILE CREEK Station 5 2070 YPCA STANDARD: PM to Exceed 1,000 =Wan 0 25 C ' - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - J- - -1 - -- ------------ - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BO ro 72 74 7e 78 w az 04 90 00 90 92 94 90 99 YEAR NINE MILE CREEK Station 4 2000 J J l l 7.O0 0 1800 - - - NPCA STANDARD: Not to Exceed 1,000 mn1wd= @ 25 C - � - i 1600 - -- --------- - ------------------ I - -- - - - -- - 1400 ------ - - - - - -- -- --------------- -Y - -� - �1200 ------ - - - - - -- - -- -- - - - - -- , -� --� U i 1000 i i i U 6 $ 00 400 ------------- no --------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 68 TO 72 74 TO 78 60 82 84 N M 90 92 94 90 90 YEAR NINE MILE CREEK Station 6 $000 �1A00 -------------------------------------- 91.600 - WCA STANDARD: NOt to E=W 1,000 Wft* e 0 25 C - - - - - - l1A00- ---- - - - - - -- ------------------------- IX0 ----- ---- - -- --- ------------ -- --- - -- - Imo i 000 ------ ------ -- - - ---- w 400 --- ------- - - - - -- -- - - -- 200 -------------------------------------- D 9e To 72 71 >8 78 00 02 H 86 W 90 92 94 96 98 YM Figure 6 Specific Conductance at Stations 3, 4, 5, and 6 r 1 0 ` f _ / 1 i 2830 2,000 v 1,800 � 1,800 lAw 1.200 V z 1,000 v qW� N 100 200 W is �a N 0 NINE MILE CREEK Station ECU -2 - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - I WA STANDARD: NOt tO Exceed 1,000 OmhWan 025 C --- - - - - -- / - --- -- - - - -- -- - / : - ----- -- - - -- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - y / 97 W YEAR NINE MILE CREEK Station ECU-3A ---------- --- --- MPCA STANDARD: Not tO Exceed 1,000 Omhosbn O 25 C - - - - - -- ---------------------------------- ----- ------- ----- y - - - -�- v------- -- - -- to so go YEAR P:\23\27\003\gMILESTR\988PTGR2.WB2 2AOO 1,800 v = 1,600 1A00 I'M 1,000 Q� m t) 600 N eta 0 $000 1,000 v 91'600 1,100 1,200 1,000 o am 600 100 LU It 200 0 07 NINE MILE CREEK Station ECU -2A - - - - - - WPCA SMNDMM Not to Exceed 1.000 wmhox /cm O 25 C - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- % - - - - - - - - - - - - - - YEAR NINE MILE CREEK Station ECU-5A SPCA STANDARD: Not tO Exceed 1,000 wnhoebn 6 26 C I -------- ---------- % -------------------------- ------------- N— ----- -- 1—\ --------- ------------------------ - -- - -- 97 Figure 7 Specific Conductance at Stations ECU -2, ECU -2A, ECU -3A, and ECU -SA 9 YEAR NINE MILE CREEK Station ECU -7A 2,000 �+SOO --- - - - - -- - - +,sao - - - - - - - - VPCA STANDARD: Not to BMW +,000 WMWCm 6 25C - - � +,moo - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- "ar+'oo - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - ----- - - - - - - +,Soo soo- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- -------- - - - - -- --- - -- - - -- - - -- ----- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- 400 --------- --- ----------- - - - - -- -- - - -- ------------------ 0 97 90 YEAR p NINE MILE CREEK Station ECU -7C Um �tAw TUPCA STANDARD: Not to M=ed+,000 whottem a 25 C --- +A50 - - - - ----------------- 1140 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - 1,550 eo5- - - -- -- -- - - - - - - - - = - -- ------ - - - - -- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - 400 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- 200 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- -- 0 97 95 99 YEAR r...,., 2A ....... 2,ODD +,500 two +,400 +,200 +,000 G o Soo Soo � Ioo N 200 0 97 NINE MILE CREEK Station ECU -7B - - - - - ACA STANDARD: Not to lroeed +,000 umhodem 9 25 C - - - -- --------- - - - - -- ----------- - - - - -- Figure 8 Specific Conductance at Stations ECU -7A, ECU -7B, and ECU -7C 99 YEAR W Dissolved Oxygen. During the 1968 through 1998 period, dissolved oxygen measurements from a' the North Branch of Nine Mile Creek have generally been within MPCA criteria (i.e., minimum of 5 mg/L). Ninety -four percent of measurements from Station 1, located at County Road 18 in Minnetonka, and ninety -five percent of measurements from Station 2, located near the intersection of T.H. 100 and I-494 in Edina, were within MPCA criteria during the 31 -year period (Figure 9). Average annual dissolved oxygen measurements from the North Branch locations monitored during 1998 ranged from 6.9 to 8.0, indicating the stream generally had adequate oxygen for all forms of aquatic life. During 1998, all measurements from Station 2 and all but one measurement from Station 1 were within MPCA criteria. Ecological use Station ECU- 2, located between Stations 1 and 2 (i.e., east of Cahill Road near Brook Drive), noted two measurements slightly less than the MPCA standard during 1998. All 1998 measurements from ECU -2A, located downstream of Interstate 494 and immediately upstream of 81st Street in Bloomington (i.e., downstream from the V previous three North Branch stations) were within MPCA criteria (Figure 11). Low dissolved oxygen values have been common at Stations 3 and 4 on the South Fork of Nine We Creek during low flow conditions (Figure 10). Both streams have observed intermittent flow and average annual discharge has generally been less than 1 cubic foot per second. The low dissolved oxygen values are believed to be due to low flow conditions that prevent stream aeration. Station 3 has exhibited a slight decline in dissolved oxygen concentrations over the past five years; the 1998 annual average at Station 3 failed to meet the MPCA standard. Trend analysis by regression indicated that Station 4 has noted a significant decline in dissolved oxygen concentrations over the past 31 years; the annual averages during four of the past five years have \ failed to meet the MPCA standard. Dissolved oxygen values at Stations 7 and 8 were less than the MPCA standard of 5 mg/L during approximately half of the sampling events during 1968 through 1990 (Figure 9). Lower values at Station 7 were caused, in part, by slow flow, which prevents aeration of the stream. Oxygen demand from decaying vegetation in the marsh area immediately upstream from Station 7 also lowered the oxygen concentration at this station. Station 8 is downstream from Station 7 and the most downstream Nine Mile Creek sampling location. The data further suggest the stream was not oxygenated between Stations 7 and 8, and that low oxygen concentrations persisted in the stream between Stations 7 and 8. During 1991 through 1998, dissolved oxygen concentrations improved slightly at Station 7, but continued to be below 5 mg/L during approximately 42 percent of the sampling events. However, oxygen concentrations at Station 8 were greater than 5 mg/L during all 1991 through 1998 sampling events. The District, in a cooperative effort with the city of Bloomington, completed the Lower Valley Restoration Project to deal with streambank erosion and 206496.wpd E -52 other problems concerning the Lower Valley reach of Nine Mile Creek. The 1991 through 1998 data suggest the project has resulted in oxygenation of Nine Mile Creek as it flows through the Lower Valley. Since project completion, the lower reaches of Nine Mile Creek have had sufficient oxygen to support aquatic life during all sampling events. Measurements from locations between Stations. 7 and 8 during 1997 through 1998 (i.e., ecological use Stations ECU -7A, ECU -7B, and ECU -7C) provide additional. confirmation of the improved oxygen conditions in the Lower Valley reach of Nine Mile Creek. During 1997 and 1998, Station 7 noted oxygen concentrations below the MPCA standard during approximately 63 percent of sample events and average annual concentrations of 5.2 and 4.9 mg/L, respectively. Station ECU -7A, i located immediately downstream of the Marsh Lake Dam, just upstream from the Lower Valley reach of Nine Mile Creek, noted oxygen concentrations below'the MPCA standard during 50 percent of 1997 sample events and 38 percent of 1998 sample events. Station ECU -7A noted 1997 and 1998 average annual concentrations of 6.1 and 5.8 mg/L, respectively. Station ECU -7B, a located in Moir Park at the upstream end of the Lower Valley Reach of Nine Mile Creek, noted oxygen concentrations below the MPCA standard during approximately 13 percent of 1997 and 1998 sample events and average annual concentrations of 7.6 and 7.4 mg/L, respectively. Oxygen " E concentrations measured at Station ECU -7C, located at West 106th Street in the middle of the Lower Valley reach of Nine Mile Creek, met the MPCA standard during all 1997 and 1998 sample -. events and noted average annual concentrations of 7.6 and 9.1 mg/L, respectively. Station 8, 7 located at the downstream end of the Lower Valley reach of Nine Mile Creek in Anderson Park, met the MPCA standard during all 1997 and 1998 sample events and'noted average annual concentrations of 8.9 and 8.7 mg/L, respectively (Figure 12). 206495.wpd E -53 NINE MILE CREEK Station 1 20 18 16 14 512 0 10 0 �e c 8 x 0 68 70 72 74 76 76 80 82 84 86 88 90 m 94 96 99 YEAR NINE MILE CREEK Station 7 20 18 18 14 012 °010 3 8 c 8 4 2 0 68 70 n 74 76 78 80 82 N 86 88 00 92 94 96 98 YEAR P:\23\27\003\9MILESTR\98RPTGR2.WB2 • `J 6 NINE MILE CREEK Station 2 20 1e-------------------------------------- 16 -------------------------------------- �14 -------------------------------------- E - -- - -- - - -- -- - - - -- -- -- - -- 6 -- - - -- -- --- - - -- - - - - -- - - 4 Fr --------- -------- - - - - -- 2 --------- - - - - -- UPCA STANDARD: 6mgIL ------ -- 0 68 70 72 74 76 ?e BO 82 d4 88 80 90 92 94 96 98 YEAR NINE MILE CREEK Station 8 20 18 -------------------------------------- 18 - - -- NPCASTANDARD:6 MI j ------------------ ,11 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - u=i12 ___ ______________ ____________ C7 � 8 � 0 i - - - -- - -- -- -- -- - -- 2 - - - - - - - - - - i 0 66 70 72 74 76 78 80 82 e4 86 8e 90 92 94 96 91 YEAR Figure 9 Dissolved Oxygen at Stations 1, 2, 7, and 8 r� un ze 1e 16 IL 14 1 512 a 0 10 D 8 6 4 2 NINE MILE CREEK Station 3 - - - - - ---- - - - - -- NIPCA STANDARD 5 mglL - -- -- ------ --- - - -. -- ------------------ --- - - - - --- - - ti i - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I 68 70 72 74 76 7B 80 BZ 84 86 as 90 92 N 66 0111- YM NINE MILE CREEK Station 5 2c 19 16 14 i 12 010 �e 0 0 4 2 r i� 66 70 72 74 76 78 60 e2 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 YEAR NINE MILE CREEK Station 4 20 18 16 14 X12 0 0 10 O � 8 6 4 2 0 08 70 72 74 76 78 60 82 64 86 88 90 92 04 96 YEAR NINE MILE CREEK Station 6 20 18 16 E 14 i5 12 110 0 �e 0 0 2 0 6B 70 72 74 78 78 e0 e2 M 80 80 90 92 91 98 i YEAR Figure 10 Dissolved Oxygen at Stations 3, 4, 5, and 6 �_,...,�T1 - - -• - MIL - "- '��9t: - - --• - - -- i - - _ 2R� � 3 ti-.-J_ _ I E 5 c gu i C+7 0% i i i NINE MILE CREEK Station ECU -2 ----------------------------------------- YPCA STANDARD. 5 S& - - - - - - - - - - - - --------- - - - - -- -------------------- ------------ -- ----- -'- -- 07 SS SS YEAR NINE MILE CREEK Station ECU-3A ------------------------------------ MmSTARDARD:S.WL --- --- -- -- - - -- ---------------------- - - -- - - - -- - -- wr 98 99 YEAR P:\23\27\003\gMILESTR\988PTGR2.WB2 N 20 18 16 t14 1 au 12 010 0 5 o S 4 2 0 a a td 15 12 t0 5 5 / 2 0 NINE MILE CREEK Station ECU -2A ----------------------------------------- ---------- YPCA STANDARD: 5ftQ& - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - - -- -- - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- 08 YEAR NINE MILE CREEK Station ECU-SA -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - YPCA STANDARD: 5 m9L ----- - --- -- -- --- -- - - -- -------- - - - - - - - I --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I-- -- - - - - i - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - V - -- - - - - - n Figure 11 Dissolved Oxygen at Stations ECU -2, ECU -2A, ECU -3A, and ECU -5A go YEAR 08 09 V 20 18 1e 14 .912 a 0 10 �e 6 4 2 0 26 16 16 14 L�1 12 110 6 8 4 2 0 NINE MILE CREEK Station ECU -7A --------------------------------------- ------ --------------- MPU STANDARD: 6 mA ------- ----- -- - - -- -------------------- ---- - - - - -- - ---- - - -- - --- - -- - -- 97 go 9g TEM NINE MILE CREEK Station ECU -7C -------------------------------------- ---- - --- -- - --- ----------------------- ----- --- -- - - - -- - - - --s- ---- ---- - - - --- ------- -- ---- --- --- ---- -- ------- -- - - -- 20 19 16 t14 E 4 12 �0 10 3 e 6 4 2 0 97 NINE MILE CREEK Station ECU -76 --------------------------------------- ---------- -- ------ - - - --- WA STANDARD.- s mg6. --- ----- - - - - - -- ----------------- - - ---- Figure 12 Dissovled Oxygen at Stations ECU -7A, ECU -7B, and ECU -7C 4 go 99 YEAR YEM 20 19 16 t14 E 4 12 �0 10 3 e 6 4 2 0 97 NINE MILE CREEK Station ECU -76 --------------------------------------- ---------- -- ------ - - - --- WA STANDARD.- s mg6. --- ----- - - - - - -- ----------------- - - ---- Figure 12 Dissovled Oxygen at Stations ECU -7A, ECU -7B, and ECU -7C 4 go 99 YEAR pH. Historically, pH values from Nine Mile Creek have generally been within the MPCA standard and have typically ranged from 7.0 to 8.5 (Figures 13 and 14). However, each of the eight historical stations have noted at least one exception. They include: • Station 1 —two values below 6.5 and three values greater than 8.5 during the period 1970 through 1983 • Stations 2 and 3 —each noted one value below 6.5 and two values greater than 8.5 during the period 1970 through 1993 • Station 4 —one value below 6.5 and one value greater than 8.5 during the period 1970 through 1993 • Station 5— one value below 6.5 and two values greater than 8.5 during the period 1973 through 1988 • Station 6 —one value below 6.5 and two values greater than 8.5 during the period 1970 through 1992 • Station 7—one value below 6.5 and three values greater than 8.5 during the period 1975 through 1993 • Station 8 —one value below 6.5 and eight values greater than 8.5 during the period 1970 through 1993 All 1993 through 1997 values measured in Nine Mile Creek were within MPCA criteria (Figures 15 and 16). During 1998, 6 percent of measured pH values failed to meet MPCA criteria. All slightly acidic values were measured in the Main Stem at locations downstream of the Marsh Lake Dam. i 206495.wpd E -58 T t.n �c 12 11 10 as A 9 E 1 8 N s 7 6 6 4 12 11 10 8 8 n 7 6 6 NINE MILE CREEK Station 1 ----- - - - - -- MPCA STANDARD: 6.56.6 Standard Units _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 68 7o n 74 76 7e so ez " 86 w 90 92 94 96 96 YEAR NINE MILE CREEK Station 7 -- - - - - -- MPCA STANDARD: 8565 Standard Units - - - - - - - -------------------------------------- 68 70 72 74 76 78 80 82 M 88 88 80 B? 94 86 YEAR a c E 6 NINE MILE CREEK Station 2 MPCA STANDARD: UM Standard Units 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - B - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - i --------------------------------------- i--------------------------------------- h 68 70- n 74 76 78 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 YEAR NINE MILE CREEK Station 8 12 11 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MPCA STANDARD: 8585 Standard UNb 8 --- -- ----- - - - ---- --- ---- - - - - - -- - - - -- 0 t7-- - - --- - -- - - - - -- -------- - - - - -- n 6 ------------------------------------- 6 ------------------------------------- 1 66 70 72 74 76, 78 80 82, 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 YEAR Figure 13 pH at Stations 1, 2, 7, and 8 P'19.';\27\nna\QMILCQT9\9800TiR2 uaen Y Y l S I t o, 0 12 11 10 9 8 N n 7 6 6 4 NINE MILE CREEK Station 3 68 70 72 74 78 78 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 9E YEAR NINE MILE CREEK Station 5 --------------------------------------- - - - - - - - - MICA STANDARD: 65-65 Standard Unb - - - - - - - - -- - - - - -- ----- 639tanaard-lfmia---------------- ----- - - -- - - - -- r r I N 79 72 74 76 78 80 82 M M 88 90 92 94 96 of YEAR Figure 14 pH at Stations 3, 4, 5, and 6 P:\23127\003\9MILESTR\98RPTGR2.WB2 12 10 8 n 6 NINE MILE CREEK Station 4 f- - - - - MPCA STANDARD: 6.5-8.5 Standard Unb - _ _ - - - _ - _ _ -I � 1 --------------------------------- 4 1�1T1T1 IT1 T T l I 1 I 68 70 72 74 78 78 80 82 84 88 88 90 92 94 96 98 YEAR NINE MILE CREEK Station 6 --------------------------------------- WA STANDARD: 6.6.8.6 Skrrdtrd UrMs -- - -- - -- - - - -- -- --- -yyam�-,,- 68 70 72 74 76 78 6t1 92 84 96 88 90 92 94 96 01 YEAR r� t o� r ■ A 12 11 10 9 6 e 5 1 97 NINE MILE CREEK Station ECU -2 - - - -- -- - - - - - - - - Standard Unb - - - - - - -MPCA STANDARD -------------------------------- _ --------- ------------- ; ---- - ------------------- ar g6 � YEAR NINE MILE CREEK Station ECU-3A -- ---- MPCA STANDARD: 656.5 Standard Urdu - - -- - -�� P:\23\27\003\9MILESTR\98RPTGR2.WB2 98 YEAR 99 I 2 in a 12 11 10 6 '6 n 7 6 5 4 NINE MILE CREEK Station ECU -2A MPCA STANDARD: 6.5-6.5 Standard Unb - - - - - - - - --------------------------------------- ---- g.5$1md& d-UlG-------------------------- - - -- B.bStmdurumT- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---- -- 97 96 99 YEAR NINE MILE CREEK Station ECU -5A [WA STANDARD: 6Sd.5 Standard Unita ------------ --- -------- ------- --- - --- -- r--------------------------------------- 7-- 97 Figure 15 pH at Stations ECU -2, ECU -2A, ECU -3A, and ECU -5A 96 YEAR 99 r�1 t o� N 14 11 10 e e ` 7 6 6 4 19 11 10 �e e �7 6 5 4 NINE MILE CREEK Station ECU -7A --------- -------- MPCA STANDARD: 6585 Sfergerd Untie ---------- -------- --------- ------ - - - - -- 66 pg YEAR NINE MILE CREEK Station ECU-7C — — — — — I MPCA STANDARD: 6.585 Stud Unrm — — — — — — — — — — L— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — --- — — — — — — — — — — — — — 12 11 10 L2 e 6 � 7 6 •6 4 NINE MILE CREEK Station ECU -7B MPCA STANDARD: 658.6 Stertlard Urft -- ----------- ----- -- -------------- - - - - -- 67 98 YEAR 67 BB gg YEAR Figure 16 pH at Stations ECU -7A, ECU -713, and ECU -7C Temperature. Temperature measurements from Nine Mile Creek have generally ranged from 32 °F during the winter months to 77 °F during the summer months (Figures 17 through 20). No trends are apparent in Nine Mile Creek. Temperature measurements have met water quality criteria throughout the period of record. 206495.wpd E -63 �n o� is s 4 7 c 6 L5 n 1 4 2 2 11 V f E 7 Q 5 4 2 L NINE MILE CREEK Station 1 ------------------------ --------------- \ \ 1 1 \ 1 � , 6s ro 72 74 78 7e eo ez 84 as a 90 92 M 96 w YEAR NINE MILE CREEK Station 7 --------------------------------------- f - ------------------------ ------------ J Li 1 1 1 1 - -- 66 70 72 74 76 78 80 82 84 66 88 90 92 94 96 98 YEAR PA23\27\003\9MILEST8 \98RPTCR2 WRIJ NINE MILE CREEK Station 2 \w 90 60 70 60 50 UA �40 90 20 10 0 68 70 72 74 76 7B 80 82 M 86 M 90 82 84 86 98 YEAR NINE MILE CREEK Station 8 190 90 --------------------------------------- 89 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ro - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - U. 0 60 - 1� 50 -�- 70 -- --- ---- -- - 20 --------------------------------------- 10 --------------------------------------- 0 68 70 72 74 78 78 80 82 84 88 8B 90 92 94 98 98 YEAR Figure 17 Temperature at Stations 1, 2, 7, and 8 1 rn NINE MILE CREEK Station 3 100 90 w LL 70 a� �50 40 30 20 10 0 N 70 72 71 78 7b QO 82 84 88 88 90 R 94 96 98 YEAR NINE MILE CREEK Station 5 1ao 90 -------------------------------------- 80 - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -------- - - - - -- �7o I -- - - -i- -�- - 1- -- - 40 = -- - 1 ! - 1 11 -1 -U F30------- ----------------------- 20 --------------------------------------- 10 ----------------------------------------- 0 6B TO 72 74 78 78 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 04 98 98 YEAR P:\23\27\003\9MILESTR\98RPTGR2.WB2 NINE MILE CREEK Station 4 100 90 --------------------------------------- 80 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 70 a - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - ' - 11 T - - i - - - 1 39 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 20 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 10 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 a 70 72 74 78 78 M a n n a 90 92 94 86 9 YEAR NINE MILE CREEK Station 6 100 w- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - so 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 70 1 -- - - -- - -- -- -- - U. 1 1 1 1 1 Y7 60 69 40 F 30 -------------------------------------- 20 -------------------------------------- 10 -------------------------------------- 0 66 70 72 74 76 78 80 82 84 86 88 80 92 84 96 98 YEAR Figure 18 Temperature at Stations 3, 4, 5, and 6 r� o% 100 40 w �o eo so i'- 40 30 20 10 0 100 e0 so U. �o U, 60 i'- w 30 20 Io 0 NINE MILE CREEK Station ECU -2 / - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - f - - - - - - - - - - - - - oa YEAR NINE MILE CREEK Station ECU -3A e7 U YEAR 100 so so m s� i'- 40 w 30 m 10 0 goo 90 so 70 s60 Uj. so �4° w m 10 0 n NINE MILE CREEK Station ECU -2A - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- —j - - - - - --- - - - - ------------------------ ----------- --------------------------------------- --------------------------------------- go YEAR NINE MILE CREEK Station ECU -SA s9 ---------- - ------ ---- P ------------- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- --------------------------------------- 97 Figure 19 Temperature at Stations ECU -2, ECU -2A, ECU -3A, and ECU -SA PA23\271003\9MILESTR\98RPTC,R2 WQ0 -, w YEAR 0s o� V lw 90 so 70 aGo �so m 20 10 0 106 90 so 70 �50 30 a 10 0 a 97 NINE MILE CREEK Station ECU -7A P I 'r ----- ----------------------- --------------------------------------- --------------------------------------- 96 99 YEAR NINE MILE CREEK Station ECU -7C -- ------------- ------------------------ I ----------- --------------------------------------- --------------------------------------- P:\23\27\003\gMILESTR\98RPTGR2.WB2 99 99 YEM 100 90 so 70 U. 60 �so lu � so 30 20 10 0 a Figure 20 Temperature at Stations ECU -7A, ECU -7B, and ECU -7C NINE MILE CREEK Station ECU-78 ----- /` ---------------- / ---------- ---------------------------------- --------------------------------- 99 YEAR 99 Fecal Collform Bacteria. Historically, high fecal coliform bacteria values have been noted at all Nine Mile Creek sampling locations (See Figures 21 and 22). High values have generally been associated with stormwater runoff from rainstorms. Sediments that have come into contact with the bacteria. are transported to streams during rainstorms, causing the occurrence of high values. Highest fecal coliform bacteria values have been observed on the North Branch of Nine Mile Creek (Stations 1 and 2) and the most downstream station of the Main Stem of Nine Mile Creek (Station 8). A malfunctioning sanitary sewer lift station in the upstream reaches of the North Branch of Nine Mile Creek resulted in the discharge of raw sewage into Nine Mile Creek during July of 1978 and May of 1985. High bacteria values were noted at Stations 1 and 2 during these periods. Because of the high values noted by the District's program, the City of Hopkins was notified of the malfunctioning lift station on both occasions and the problem was corrected. Lower bacteria values have generally been observed throughout the North Branch of Nine Mile Creek since the lift station was repaired in 1985. Stations 1, 2, and 8 have generally noted higher annual average fecal coliform bacteria values than the other Nine Mile Creek sampling locations. Approximately'84 percent of Station 1 and 94 percent of Stations 2 and 8 average annual values have failed to meet MPCA criteria during the period of record. Approximately 39 to 58 percent of average annual values from Stations 3 through seven have failed to meet MPCA criteria during the period of record. During 1998, all stations noted levels of bacteria "Too Numerous to Count" (i.e., greater than 3,400 colonies/100 mL) on August 3. As discussed previously, approximately 2.11 inches of precipitation occurred during August 2 through 3. Stormwater runoff is the apparent cause of the elevated levels of fecal coliform bacteria on August 3. 206495.wpd E -68 ref CT �O P:\23\27\003\9MILESTR\98RPTGR2.WB2 NINE MILE CREEK Station 2 3,600 17,000 5,500 14,0 35,000 3,000 2.500 8 $000 SONO 1,500 O 81.060 U I I1�1\1 1�11�Yid 'I�tB ►lllll't1��111a{lllPJAIi�� Il�'l11!ll�y�►wl� 68 70 72 74 76 78 80 82 84 88 U 90 82 94 96 98 YEAR NINE MILE CREEK 6.600 Station 8 41200 11.000 3,000 9.100 6,600 95.000 6.200 7.590 7.600 57.000 TNTC J I I I 1 IICA STANDARD: Not to Exceed 200 Colontae. (CFU /100 ML) I I 1 1 2,000 - 1 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- — — — — - -- W I I OI J I I - - - - -- - - -- s - 0: 1 I 1,OW I _— _ —_ _ _ _ _ 1 t) I I 1 � S00 1 -t- - - -- 1 I ` 0 68 TO 72 71 76 70 80 BZ 81 88 a 90 82 94 96 98 YEAR TIM: to numerous to comt Figure 21 Fecal Coliform at Stations 1, 2, 7, and 8 NINE MILE CREEK No 17,000 14,000 Station 1 3,000 5,100 25,000 3,400 3,0D0 3,400 I 35000 10,600 5,000 i6 4'000 -i �' 2,500 I I MPCA r - STANDARD: Not to Exceed 200 ColaMe9, (CFU/100 ML) 1 _ _ 8 1 2,000 L�-- -- - --- I - -- - - - - - — — — — — — — — — 1 — I c 1.500 1 -- -- --- - - -- - - -- -------- -- p 9 1,000 I I 1 , 1— — i — — —-- _ _ _ _ _ _ ——------- I I I 1 V 1 1 I I I I V 1 500 — — —I — 1 I 1 I 0 I I 68 70 72 74 76 78 80 82 64 86 ea 90 92 94 96 98 YEAR NINE MILE CREEK Station 7 3,000 4.500 3.000 TNTC 51 2,500 — — — — — — — — — - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - �� - - - MPCA STANDARD: Not to Exceed 200 Colonies. (CPU /L00 ML) - - - I 51500 I __-- _- _ - -_ -_ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ m cc 51,000 1 I 1 r \_________ 1 \ -_ - _ - I \ I W LL 500 1 --r - ffilld- 1 ----- = 1 - - oil ` 1 ` ` ` 68 70 72 74 76 78 80 82 80 86 88 90 92 84 96 98 YEAR P:\23\27\003\9MILESTR\98RPTGR2.WB2 NINE MILE CREEK Station 2 3,600 17,000 5,500 14,0 35,000 3,000 2.500 8 $000 SONO 1,500 O 81.060 U I I1�1\1 1�11�Yid 'I�tB ►lllll't1��111a{lllPJAIi�� Il�'l11!ll�y�►wl� 68 70 72 74 76 78 80 82 84 88 U 90 82 94 96 98 YEAR NINE MILE CREEK 6.600 Station 8 41200 11.000 3,000 9.100 6,600 95.000 6.200 7.590 7.600 57.000 TNTC J I I I 1 IICA STANDARD: Not to Exceed 200 Colontae. (CFU /100 ML) I I 1 1 2,000 - 1 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- — — — — - -- W I I OI J I I - - - - -- - - -- s - 0: 1 I 1,OW I _— _ —_ _ _ _ _ 1 t) I I 1 � S00 1 -t- - - -- 1 I ` 0 68 TO 72 71 76 70 80 BZ 81 88 a 90 82 94 96 98 YEAR TIM: to numerous to comt Figure 21 Fecal Coliform at Stations 1, 2, 7, and 8 V O 3,001 s 2X N 2,000 Z 0 V t� OC L NINE MILE CREEK Station 3 r------------------ I1 I I I �IIIP�' �,l �Wl��r� '��� ► /�'�1��111i'ls1�1D1�1 w 70 72 71 78 78 80 BQ 8/ 88 BB 80 82 84 g8 88 YEAR NINE MILE CREEK Station 5 30 3 �o .00 ri 2,500 8 2,000 1,500 7� 1,000 500 0 60 70 72 74 78 78 80 82 84 88 as 80 82 94 88 88 YEAR NINE MILE CREEK Station 4 3000 9.000 5.900 . 14.000 39.000 51 2500 8 V i{� N W 1500 O tD00 Q 0 1 w 10 72 74 78 78 80 82 64 w M tp 82 1M 88 88 YEAR NINE MILE CREEK Station 6 3= 8•5w 7.600 3.810 3.800 TNTC I J -J_ g 2SOO I MPCA STANDARD: Nol to Eased 200 WNW, MLA I 1 2M---J -- - - - - -- - - - - -- -� ----------- 1- -- 1 I I 8twD - -J -- ------- - -- - -- -- --- - - - - -1 - 1 I - cc 1 1 I 1 1 _ _ _ _ ----------- 1 _ 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I __ _ 1 �I 1 1 I 0 1 1 w 70 72 74 76 78 80 82 84 88 88 00 02 04 88 88 YEAR TM: To numerous to count Figure 22 Fecal Coliform at Stations 3, 4, 5, and 6 \27^ ^ ^` ^10I1 _"_� \9f' aR�� -- -- � - _...._.__ -_.__ __._.__ �..___� _- ___• -__ ...�. -� a > i �I -- I I 1 I I �1 �G: 1I' IIIII► I9l �l�Il�l�.1�111!1�.71�i1DIlIIN11 1 w 10 72 74 78 78 80 82 64 w M tp 82 1M 88 88 YEAR NINE MILE CREEK Station 6 3= 8•5w 7.600 3.810 3.800 TNTC I J -J_ g 2SOO I MPCA STANDARD: Nol to Eased 200 WNW, MLA I 1 2M---J -- - - - - -- - - - - -- -� ----------- 1- -- 1 I I 8twD - -J -- ------- - -- - -- -- --- - - - - -1 - 1 I - cc 1 1 I 1 1 _ _ _ _ ----------- 1 _ 1 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I __ _ 1 �I 1 1 I 0 1 1 w 70 72 74 76 78 80 82 84 88 88 00 02 04 88 88 YEAR TM: To numerous to count Figure 22 Fecal Coliform at Stations 3, 4, 5, and 6 \27^ ^ ^` ^10I1 _"_� \9f' aR�� -- -- � - _...._.__ -_.__ __._.__ �..___� _- ___• -__ ...�. -� a > Suspended Solids and Turbidity. Because much of the water quality sampling of Nine Mile Creek has occurred during fair weather, suspended solids and turbidity values are essentially baseline flow values. Suspended solids values greater than 50 mg/L and turbidity values greater than 25 NTU, however, have been associated with samples collected during or shortly after storm events or following a period of snowmelt. During periods when the water quality of Nine Mile Creek has been impacted by runoff from the tributary watershed, Stations 1, 2, and 8 have exhibited poorer water quality than the other stations. The primary source of solids in the watersheds tributary to Stations 1 and 2 have been runoff from major highways. T.H. 169, formerly County Road 18, is located adjacent to Station 1 and T.H. 100 is located adjacent to Station 2. Station 8 is the most downstream station, and receives solids added to the stream from the entire watershed. Its high suspended solids and turbidity values during 1991 were primarily due to the construction activities related to the Lower Valley Restoration Project. Station 7 exhibited lower suspended solids and turbidity values than the other stations throughout the period of record. Station 7 is located on a reach of Nine Mile Creek immediately after the creek passes through a 3/4- square -mile area of wetland. Much of the solid materials found in Nine Mile Creek settle out as the creek passes through the wetland, thus lowering the solids concentrations and turbidity values found in the creek at Station 7. Reduced suspended solids concentrations were observed at Stations 5 and 6 during 1978 through 1992. The lower values appear to be due, at least in part to the beaver dam construction between the two stations during this time period. The beaver dams have frequently caused Station 5 to be a stagnant pool, and have reduced flow to Station 6. Additional solids were settled out in the pool at Station 5 resulting in lower solids values at this station and at Station 6, located downstream from Station 5. During 1997 through 1998, the sampling locations on the North Fork of Nine Mile Creek generally noted higher annual average suspended solids and turbidity measurements than the other sample locations. The 1998 annual average turbidity measurement from Station 1 was higher than the annual averages noted during the period of record. Values from the North Fork were generally higher than other locations during both runoff and baseline flow conditions. Highest suspended solids and turbidity values from the North Fork were noted following runoff events. During 1998, turbidity exceeded MPCA criteria at six locations (i.e., four locations on the North Fork and the two most downstream locations on the Main Stem) on August 3. As discussed previously, approximately 2.11 inches of precipitation occurred during August 2 through 3. 206495.wpd E -71 The South Branch of Nine Mile Creek stations had no measured exceedance of the MPCA turbidity. standard during 1998. However, the 1998 annual average turbidity measurement from Station 6 was higher than the annual averages noted during the period of record. 1998 annual average turbidity measurements from other South Branch locations were within the range of values observed during the period of record. 206495.wpd E -72 1 V W NINE MILE CREEK Station 1 zm 175 150 ai 125 0 7 69 100 ro N 50 25 0 68 ro 72 74 78 70 8D 82 a a 88 80 82 a 86 a YEAR NINE MILE CREEK Station 7 240 1.000 20C 175 155 125 M 100 5o 25 0 a ro 72 m 78 78 80 a a a 88 80 a a 88 88 YEM P:\23\27\003\9MILESTR\98RPTGR2.WB2 NINE MILE CREEK Station 2 zoo 175 150 E (9 125 0 0 8100 G W %'j N so N 1 1 I I I I 1 I I 1 1 I T I T1�T 66 ro 72 74 76 78 80 62 a 86 M 80 112 04' 86 80 YEAH NINE MILE CREEK Station 8 200 175 150 E of125 8 100 75 N so 25 0 se ro 72 71 76 76 6o e2 a m a N a a 86 68 YEAR Figure 23 Suspended Solids at Stations 1, 2, 7, and 8 t� 2 1 1'. E uqi 11 7 X11 0 W w 5 2 200 175 19 150 E ai 125 0 C 100 w 75 tZ N 69 25 0 NINE MILE CREEK Station 3 I 1 - -I- - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 I - -1- - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - I -- r- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I - - r-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I - - -r - -- - - - - - I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I - I - -------------- - - - - I r 89 70 72 74 78 7B BO 82 64 86 88 90 92 9G � � YEAR NINE MILE CREEK Station 5 730 1.000 250 60 m 72 74 76 70 00 82 N 06 85 90 92 94 96 90 YEAR Figure 24 200 175 150 E c6 125 0 c 100 W 2 4 75 N N so 25 0 NINE MILE CREEK 2.800 Station 4 7.100 69 70 72 74 76 70 w a a w M 90 92 w 99 90 YEAR NINE MILE CREEK Station 6 200 I I 175 ' ' 1 I 1 1 150 1- - -I- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 1 E f/j 1 1 125 I - -- -- - - - ------------------ - ------------ 7 I 1 p I I 0 100 _ _ _1-- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ,9 I 1 O 1 75.., __ -- y 1 I to I 1 5o - - -L - --- ------------ --------------- 1 1 I 1 1 Lam,,_ � 0 60 70 72 74 70 70 00 02 04 06 00 90 92 94 96 90 YEAR Suspended Solids at Stations 3, 4, 5, and 6 P:\23\27\003\9MILESTR\98RPTGR2.WRO t V NINE MILE CREEK Station 1 100 go.- L _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 70 - - - - NPCA STANDARD: Not to Exceed 25 NTU 60 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - II50 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -------------------; 10 Vj! - 0 W 68 TO 72 74 76 78 80 82 84 86 88 go 92 64 96 go YEAR 100 90 80 70 60 SD z40 30 20 10 NINE MILE CREEK Station 7 --------------------------------------- --------------------------------------- I--------------------------------------- 1 d -------- YPCA STANDARD: Not to Exceed 25 NTU -------- -:� ----- - - - - -- ------------ - - - - -- ------------------- -------------- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- :� � e9 70 72 74 78 78 80 82 84 86 88 gp 92 84 96 99 YEAR P:\23\27\003\9MILESTR\98RPTGR2.WB2 NINE MILE CREEK Station 2 100 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 80 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 70 - - - - - - - - NPCA STANDARD: Not to Exceed 25 NTU - - - - - - - 60 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Q50 , -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - i X40i-- ---- --- -- - ----- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - i 30 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- ---------------- 20 ------ - - - - -- -- ---------------- 10 -- ° = -- -- - - - -� 0 68 70 72 74 76 78 80 82 84 86 6g go 92 94 96 go YEAR NINE MILE CREEK Station 8 250 180 t00 90 8o 70 60 eso z40 20 to- 0- Figure 25 Turbidity at Stations 1, 2, 7, and 8 i '- ---------- -------- --- - - - - - -- - --- - - - - -- ------------ - - - - -- --- - - - - -- - - - - - - -- ------ - - - J- 70 72 74 76 78 80 82 84 88 w 90 a N 96 96 YEAR r� t v ON Iw 90 so 70 60 50 Q 30 20 10 0 100 80 80 70 so 8 50 40 m 20 W 0 NINE MILE CREEK Station 3 ---------- - - - - -- ---------- - - - - -- - - -- -- - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - MPCA STANDARD. Not to - - - -- Exceed 25 NTU i II - II I � 1 1 r--- - - - - -- - - -- - - -- -1- - - - - - - - - - - I 88 70 n 71 78 78 eo e2 " N w 80 82 " 88 88 YEAR NINE MILE CREEK Station 5 a 7o n 74 75 >e eo ez ad se ee tao e2 sa e5 sa YEAR o.�e�,�T.►no��Mli ��.Tri \9Pcora�r•.....� NINE MILE CREEK Station 4 100 so--------------------------------------- eo--------------------------------------- 70 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------ MPCA STANDARD: Not to Exceed 25 NTU I 50 - -- - --- -- ---- - -- - - - - - - - - — -- ----- - - - - - --------------------- — I I 20 -- I----- -- - - -- - - -- ----------=----- I 20 - -rtil- ------------- -------- -- 0 p 70 n 74 78 78 80 82 84 88 88 80 82 84 86 80 YEAR NINE MILE CREEK Station 6 100 80 -------------------------------------- 80 -------------------------------------- TO - - - - - - - - - - MPCA STANDARD Not to Exceed 25 NTU - - - - - 80 - - - - - - - - - - - -- Q50 - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - 1 40------------ -- -- -- ---- -- -------- - -- - -- 1 30. II 20 ----------------------------- 10----- - - - - -- - -- - -- i a 7 n 74 TO 78 80 82 84 88 88 80 82 84 88 88 YEAR Figure 26 Turbidity at Stations 3, 4, 5; and 6 r� V V E -a F 100 90 w 70 W B60 a F' 4D 30 20 10 0 NINE MILE CREEK Station ECU -2 --------------------------------------- ------------------------------------- ---- MPCA STANDARD: Not to Exceed 25 mu - -- ------- - - - --- -------------- ------------------------ ----------------------- ---------------- -------- - - - - -- A- --- --- - - - - - -- - - --- ----------- ---- ------------ j 97 95 29 YEAR NINE MILE CREEK Station ECU-3A --------------------------------------- MPCA STANDARD: Not to Exceed 25 NTU - - -- - -- -- - - -- - -- ---------------------- --------------------- -------------------- --------------------------------------- W 99 99 YEAR P:\23\27\003\9MILESTR\98RPTGR2.WB2 100 90 SD 70 Go g9 SD K 40 3D 20 10 0 100 90 90 70 60 8 SO F' 40 30 20 10 0 NINE MILE CREEK Station ECU -2A ---------------------------------------- ----------------------- ----------------- MPCA STANDARD: Not to Exceed 25 NTU --------------------------------------- ------------------- -------------------- ----- - -- - -- - --- -- -- - -- -- -- - - - -- -------- ------ �L �-- -- ---------- --- \c- ---------------- -------- ----------- 97 97 � 99 YEAR NINE MILE CREEK Staflon ECU -5A --------------------------------------- - - - - - MPCA STANDARD Not to Exceed 25 N1U -------- - - - - -- ---------------------- - -- ----- -- ------- --- - --- Figure 27 Turbidity at Stations ECU -2, ECU -2A, ECU -3A, and ECU -5p 99 98 YEAR t V tb 100 Do so 70 60 G so 1400 -m 20 10 0 100 N 60 70 w e so � eo �o 10 0 97 NINE MILE CREEK . Station ECU -7A MPCA STANDARD: Not to Exceed n NW - - - - - -7 - - - - NINE MILE CREEK Station ECU -76 100 eo - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - so - - - - -- MiCASTANDARD: Not to - - - - - - - - - - Exceed 25 NTU 70 - - -- -- ---- - - - - -- 60 = - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - =- - - - - - - - - - - sso - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - m - 60 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --------------- - - - -- w - ----------------- 20 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----------------'--- 10 - - - - - - - -- - -- - - - - - - - - - - -- - -- - - - - -- sa yy to 9 YEAR YEAR NINE MILE CREEK Station ECU -7C MKA STANDARD: Nat to Exceed 25 NTU -------------------- ------- A ------------------ ------------- ----- 99 Discharge. Discharge has been measured at the eight Nine Mile Creek sampling stations since 1986 when samples were collected. Because the methodology used to measure discharge in 1986 was different from the discharge methodology used in subsequent years, discharge measurements ` from 1986 are not included. There are no trends apparent from the discharge data and the yearly changes in flow conditions noted in the data reflect climatic changes. For example, low flows occurred at all station locations during 1987 and 1988 because of drought conditions. A return to more normal precipitation. conditions in 1989 through the present has resulted in higher flows at all locations. During 1998, flows at Stations 6, 7, and 8 and five of the seven ecological use stations (i.e., i ECU -3A, ECU -5A, ECU -7A, ECU -7B, and ECU -7C) during April were higher than values recorded in previous years. The higher values apparently resulted from the addition of stormwater runoff to the stream near the time of measurement. Approximately 1.65 inches of precipitation occurred f j within 48 hours of measurement and a total of 3.76 inches of precipitation occurred within one week of measurement. All other 1998 values were within the range of values observed in previous 1. years. I i 206495.wpd E -79 PG LU a v N 0 r� w 0 `¢W S V O NINE MILE CREEK Station 1 t------------------- ------ -- ------- - - - - - I T_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _I -------------------------- -------------- 1 1 1 -------------------------I- �� J ` 11 •1_ �/L 87 Be 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 89 YEAR NINE MILE CREEK Station 7 r------------------------------------- i�- -i U Be 89 90 91 92 a 94 95 96 97 98 99 YEAR P_x23\P.7\0o3\gM ILFGTR198PPTr, R2.1A,0., NINE MILE CREEK Station 2 130 104 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W c� x y52- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 96 99 YEAR NINE MILE CREEK Station 8 130 104 ---- - - - - -- ----------- ------------- E78---- - - - - -- -- --------------------- W x 52 I - - - - - - - -- -- -- - - - - - -1- - - - - - - - 1 1 1 87 88 99 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 YEAR Figure 29 Discharge at Stations 1, 2, 7, and 8 r� 00 I.- f O so 40 L 30 cgs i 20 0 10 0 NINE MILE CREEK Station 3 i' ---------- ----- ------ -- ------ ----- - -- - - I r---------------------------------- - - - -- I 87 88 89 -90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 YEAR NINE MILE CREEK Station 5 r---------------------------------- - - - - -i -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - t--------------- - - - - -- 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - y - _ - _ - - _ - _ _ - - _ - - - 1 1 1 - ---- ---- 1. \ / 1 J 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 YEAR P:\23\27\003\9MILESTR\98RPTGR2.WB2 NINE MILE CREEK Station 4 10.0 10.0 9.0 --------------------------- 8A--------------------------- 7.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - LBA - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - d a5.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x W4A - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---- - -- - -- 3A- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - T - ----- - -- --- 1 2.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----- - -- - -- 1 OA - - - - - - - 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 04 95 96 97 98 99 YEAR 5o 40 �+ 30 W a O 29 Figure 30 Discharge at Stations 3, 4, 6, and 6 NINE MILE CREEK Station 6 \ 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 90 99 YEAR �n 00 N d a a s c s0 40 9m a 120 10 0 NINE MILE CREEK Station ECU -2 97 99 YUR NINE MILE CREEK Station ECU -3A -- ----------- --------- r---------------------------------- - - - - - I r---------------------------------- - - - - - I r---------------------------------- - - - - - i 97 P•��a�Tnn��oMll �c'•9 \9P°OT aR: •...,,� a YEAR w 40 130 W u a 5120- 10 0 97 So 40 9m 20 10 0 97 Figure 31 Discharge at Stations ECU -2, ECU -2A, ECU -3A, and ECU -5A NINE MILE CREEK Station ECU -2A 9a YEAH NINE MILE CREEK Station ECU -SA 99 YEAH 99 200 ISO W g 100 N O sG zoo w ISO c� goo 0 so 0 NINE MILE CREEK Station ECU -7A I /\'JI-� ------- 98 YEAR NINE MILE CREEK Station ECU -7C ------ -------- - -- - --- ------- k ------- In P:\23\27\003\gMILESTR\98RPTGR2.WB2 98 e0 YEAR soo ISO Ur Im O so NINE MILE CREEK Station ECU -713 Figure 32 Discharge at Stations ECU -7A, ECU -713, and ECU -7C 98 YEAR J Nitrate Nitrogen. The MPCA has not set a stream standard for nitrate nitrogen. Historically, nitrate nitrogen values have generally been below 2 mg(L at Nine Mile Creek sample locations since 1980. Nitrate nitrogen values were less than 1 mg(L throughout 1998 at all locations except Stations 1 and 4. Values of 1.10 and 1.40 mg(L were observed during March at Stations 1 and 4, respectively (Figures 33 and 34). The higher value at Station 4 occurred concurrently with the addition of snowmelt runoff to the stream. Historically, higher nitrate nitrogen values have been observed at Station 4 than at other sample locations. 206495.wpd E_84 ao Un NINE MILE CREEK Station 1 8.0 7.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X6.0 -- - - - - -- 65.0 -- - - - - -- ------------------------------ ff 4D- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - k+3.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - i z2.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - li 0.0- 68 70 72 74 76 78 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 66 YEAR NINE MILE CREEK Station 7 8.0 7.0 6.0 65.0 z W 0 4A 9 3.0 2.0 1.0 OA 66 70 72 74 76 78 80 82 64 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 YEAR P:\23\27\003\9MILESTR\98RPTGR2.WB2 NINE MILE CREEK Station 2 8.0 7.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X6.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 65.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - i 64.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 3.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - i z2.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - i 66 70 72 74 76 78 80 82 64 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 YEAR NINE MILE CREEK Station 8 eD 7.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Z6A - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 15.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 34.0 -------------------------------------- 0 �3.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - z024 - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1A - - � OD '114 v 68 70 72 74 78 78 80 82 dd 88 66 90 92 94 98 98 YEAR Figure 33 Nitrate - Nitrogen at Stations 1, 2, 7, and 8 NINE MILE CREEK Station 3 �r 6A 7.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - g6A ------------------ - - - - - ;6A ---- n - - -- -- 11 d 7.0 11 84A z z2.0 -- ---- --- -- - - -- - -- - II 1 1 1 1 - - -- - -1 I -- -- - - -- ---------------- 1 1 1A - - \ 1 I --- err- r------ - - -- - -- 68 70 72 74 78 78 90 82 H 86 M 90 62 94 96 66 ----------------------------- YEAR NINE MILE CREEK 00 Station 5 0% 6.9 7.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7.0 -- - - - - -- - ---- -- -- - - -- ---------------- ?BA -- - -- - -- ----------------------------- 6A-- -- - - -- ----------------------------- �1 84.0 - - -- - - -- ------------------------- z -- - --- zu- -- - ------------------------ 1.0 - - - - - --------1--------------- 1 60 70 12 71 78 7e 60 82 M 88 M 90 92 84 96 98 YEAR Figure 34 NINE MILE CREEK Station 4 - B.O. 7.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NINE MILE CREEK . Station 6 am 7.0 -------------- -------- ------ ----- - - -- -- Z----------- --------- ------------- - - - - -- A6A- - - - - - - - - = - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - :ti 94.0 ------------------ --------------- - - - - -- �u&0 --------------------------------------- 20 - -- - - -- -- -- -'- ------- --------- -- - - - -- -- 1.0 - -- - ----------- -------- -- --- - - - --- 68 70 72 74 76 78 8D 82 84 86 88 90 92 .94 98 96 YEAR Nitrate - Nitrogen at Stations 3, 4, 5, and 6 P'\9-'4\271oo3k9MIL F.QTq \gi'oo-r aR21AlOn �«"_ �_._ __ - •_ .._� °.__'_ -� �__....._ ,..___._ - ._.,.per ;A"'°`°°��% .......�., ....... -_�. ._____._, t 3 Phosphorus. Much of the water quality sampling of Nine Mile Creek has occurred during fair weather. Therefore, most of the phosphorus values shown on Figures 35 and 36 are baseline flow values. Occasionally, samples were collected during or shortly after storm events, and high phosphorus values were noted in samples impacted by stormwater runoff. During 1998, Nine Mile Creek phosphorus values were similar to values observed in recent years and were within the range of values observed during the period of record. 206495.wpd E_87 NINE MILE CREEK Station 1 2.0 1A----------------------------------- 1A----------------------------------- 11A' - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ur ,R 1.2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - O 061.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - a. - --------------------------- 0.6 - - - - - - - ---------------------- - - - - -- 0.1 - -- -- - - -- -- ---- - - - - -- 1 � 0.0 66 70 72 74 76 76 80 V 14 86 M 90 0 94 96 96 YEAR NINE MILE CREEK Station 2 zo 1A- ----------------------------------- 1A- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1A - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - N - - - - - - - - ' 0 1 ILCA - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - �OA - - - - - - - - - - - - - - r ---------------- n Ln 1 '1 _ 66 70 72 74 78 78 60 62 M 66 M 90 a 94 ft N YEAR r� NINE MILE CREEK Station 7 00 2.0- 1.8 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.0 1A NINE MILE CREEK Station 8 -- - - - - - - - --------------------------- 1A- - - - - - - - - - --------------------=----- 1.4 -------------------------------------- 1A----------------------------------------- 11.1 ----- - - --- -- - - -- ----- 9W1Z ---- - - -- -- -- --- - - - - - ----------- -- - - -- 1.2 o 10 --- - - -- - -- --------------------------- g10 -- - - - - -- --------------------------- d-- OA--- - - - - -- --------------------------- --- - -- -------- -- -------- --- - - - - -- 40.8 ---- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- - - - - - 01 - - --- -- --- - -- --- '' ' 0.1 Y V V 1n �- J\I Y 11 ✓ �l �1, -- --- - - - - -- 0.6 / ea 70 72 71 76 76 e0 ez d. 1g !S 90 92 94 96 96 YEAR OA 68 70 72 74 76 78 80 82 34 86 N 90 02 91 96 a YEAR Figure 35 Total Phosphorus at Stations 1, 2, 7, and 8 P:\23\27\003\9MILESTR\98RPTGRP-WR9 NINE MILE CREEK Station 3 NINE MILE CREEK Station 4 2.0 1b---- - - - --- --------------------------- 1b-- -- - - -- -- --------------------------- E1A ---- - -- - -- -------------- 112 - - - - - - - - - - -- ---- -- - - - - -- ------------ 1A - - - - - - - - - - --- -- 0 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - �n0.8 - - - - - -- --------------------------- 4 SOb- - - - - - -- ------------------------ 0.9 - - - - - - - - 69 70 n 71 76 76 ao ez 8a 66 U W 92 94 96 99 YEAR NINE MILE CREEK Station 5 2.0 1.6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1.6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 11.1 -------------------------- 91.2 ---- -- -- -- -- ------------------------ 0 N1.0 _____ ___ _________ __________________ �Ob - - - - - - - �0.6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - � - ` ` \ 66 70 n 74 76 76 60 62 64 66 66 90 92 94 se se YEAR P:\23\27\003\gMILESTR\98RPTGR2.WB2 2.0 1b-- ----------------------------------- 1.6 ----------------------------------- E1.4 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X12 ----------------------------------- 0 y1.0 ____ ___ ___ ______ ___________________ 0 E0.6 - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 00.6 - - -- ------------------------------ 0.1 -- - M- 0.0 - - - - - - - - ` - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - J `\ 0.2--- _ _] �\ F ��_"________ - i ' 69 70 n 74 76 76 6o 62 64 66 66 90 92 94 96 98 YEAR NINE MILE CREEK Station 6 20 1.0 ------------------------------------- 1b ------------------------------------- E1A- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 112 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 0 41A------------------------------------ 0.6 ------------------------------------ �0.6 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - i P oo y 66 70 72 74 76 76 60 62 64 66 M 90 92 94 96 96 YEAR Figure 36 Total Phosphorus at Stations 3, 4, 5, and 6 Ecological Use Classification The Use Attainability Analysis (UAA) of Nine Mile Creek included an ecological use classification of the stream (Barr 1998a). The classification was based on low flow discharge, minimum dissolved oxygen, and maximum temperature data from the historical water quality monitoring stations (i.e., 1 -8). Table 17 compares the values used for the UAA with the values measured during 1997 and 1998. The comparison indicates that data from 1997 and 1998 were similar to the values used in the determination of the stream's UAA. This is confirming evidence that the recommendations made in the UAA were appropriate and valuable for use by the District in managing the stream. 206495.wpd E -90 t� �o r Table 17 Ecological Use Monitoring Results for Nine Mile Creek In 1997 -1998 206496.wpd E -91 Estimated for Ecological Use Classification 1997 Water Quality Results 1998 Water Quality Results Flow Minimum Maximum Minimum Minimum Maximum Minimum Minimum Maximum ECU Discharge D.O. Temp Discharge D.O. Temp Discharge D.O. Temp Stream Station (cis) (mg /L) (F) (cfs) (mg /L) (F) (cfs) (mg /L) (F) North 2 1.46 5.3 72 2.00 4.0 73 2.5 4.2 70 Fork 2A 2.91 5.9 72 4.40 5.6 72 5.7 5.8 70 South 3A 0.14 5.2 68 <0.01 2.5 70 0 1.0 68 Fork 5A 0.77 3.4 74 0.61 1.5 76 2 1.0 74 7A 4.58 2.8 74 3.66 2.8 73 6.3 1.9 72 Main Stem 713 3.09 6.1 70 3.72 4.5 73 6.0 3.7 72 7C 3.43 6.8 70 5.80 5.6 73 6.2 7.2 71 206496.wpd E -91 1998 Aquatic Organism Surveys Fish The results of the fish survey are summarized in Table 18. Included in the table are the numbers of each species collected and the ecological use classifications (A -E) for each fish species. The actual ecological use of each station, determined from the fish data, are also presented. The potential ecological uses (i.e., determined in the Nine Mile Creek Use Attainability Analysis, Barr, 1998a) for the stations are included for comparison with the actual uses (i.e., determined from the 1998 fish data). The potential use is the highest level a stream can attain based on long term low stream flow, long -term water quality conditions, and habitat. Methods used to determine potential use and a detailed discussion of potential and actual ecological uses are discussed in the Nine Mile Creek Use Attainability Analysis (Barr 1998a). In all but two of the stations, the actual ecological use is lower than the stream's potential ecological use. The data indicate the degrading impact of stormwater runoff on the stream's flow, water quality, and/or habitat conditions. One exception is the South Fork Station 5A, which has a higher classification (i.e., Class B —warm water sport fish) for actual ecological use than the potential ecological use (i.e., Class D— tolerant forage fish). The discrepancy likely occurs because the potential use was based upon the minimum flow conditions observed in this stream reach. However, warm water sport fish (i.e., very small sizes) inhabited the stream reach despite the minimum flow conditions. The warm water sport fish likely originated in Smetana Lake, located upstream from Station ECU -5A. A second exception is the Main Stem Station 7A, which has the same actual ecological use as the potential use (Class D— tolerant forage fish). Three of the ecological use Stations (2, 7A and 7C) are proximal to three biological monitoring stations —the North Fork at Cahill Road, Marsh Lake Outlet, and 106th Street stations, respectively. The biological monitoring stations were sampled by the District during the period 1974 through 1996 and the ecological use stations were monitored during 1997 through 1998. Data from the three ecological use stations were compared with historical data from the three proximal biological monitoring stations (See Figures 37, 38, and 39). Data from 1998 indicated: • actual ecological use on the North Fork at Cahill Road/2 was similar to the long term average use for this station; • actual ecological use on the Main Stem at Marsh Lake Dam/7A was significantly lower than the long term average, but within the range found at this site; 206495.wpd E -92 t E • actual ecological use on the Main Stem reach at 106th Street/7C was much higher than the long term average, but also within the range found at this site. A continued increase (i.e., improvement) in the actual ecological use was noted in 1998. Data collected during 1974 through 1998 were used to determine the actual long -term ecological use of each biological and ecological use monitoring station. • The North Fork at Cahill Road/2 is a Class D reach (i.e., tolerant forage fish) • The Main Stem at the Marsh Lake Outlet17A is a Class C reach (i.e., intolerant forage fish) • The Main Stem of Nine Mile Creek at 106th Street/7C is a Class C reach (i.e., intolerant forage fish). A comparison of the long -term ecological use (i.e., actual use) and the potential ecological use of each monitoring location indicates a discrepancy occurs between the two uses. Degrading impacts of stormwater runoff have resulted in a lower actual use than potential use at the North Fork (i.e., Cahill Road/2) and Main Stem (i.e., at 106th Street/7A) locations. Specifically, the North Fork location notes a long -term actual use of Class D— tolerant forage fish and a long -term potential use of Class A --cold water sport fish. The Main Stem at 106th Street.17A location notes a long -term actual use of Class C (intolerant forage fish) and a long -term potential use of Class A—cold water sport fish. In contrast, the long -term actual use at the Marsh Lake Dam/7A was higher than the potential use. Specifically, the actual use was Class C (i.e., intolerant forage fish) and the potential use was Class D (i.e., tolerant forage fish). As discussed in the Nine Mile Creek Use Attainability Analysis, urbanized land use and urban stormwater runoff impacts have permanently influenced Nine Mile Creek. Warmer temperatures caused by the stormwater runoff preclude the maintenance of a coldwater fisheries in the North Fork and the lower Main Stem (106th Street/7C). The attainable ecological use at the North Fork and lower Main Stem (106th Street) is something less than the potential ecological use because of urban impacts to these reaches. In contrast, fish species inhabiting the Main Stem reach at the Marsh Lake Dam/7A are of a higher ecological use than predicted by the stream's potential use. i 206495.wpd E -93 Table 18 Nine Mile Creek Fish Survey - July'29, 1998 Species Ecological . Use Nine Mile Creek Station Locations North Fork South Fork Main Stem 2 2A SA 7A 7B 7C Lepomis macrochirus (bluegill) B 0 1 37 2 3 7 Lepomis cyanellus (green sunfish) B 0 1 39 0 0 1 Micropi'erus salmoides (largemouth bass) (1" to 4 ") B 0 1 6 2 0 5 Semotilus atromaculatus (creek chub) D 178 43 0 80 63 6 Etheostoma nigrum (Johnny darter) D 1 7 0• 1 0 0 Catostomus commersoni (white sucker) D 8 1 0 7 4 1 Eucalia inconstans (brook stickleback) D 8 1 0 0 0 0 Notropisnubellus (rosy face shiner) C 111 0 0 0 0 0 Campostoma anomaium pullum (central stoneroller) 'C 2 0 0 2 1 0 Chrosomrs eos (northern redbelly dace) C 0 0 0 5 19 0 Pimephales promelas (northern fathead minnow) D 0 0 0. 5 1 0 lcatalurus.melas (black bullhead) B 0 0 0 4 0 1 Perca flavescens (yellow perch) : B 0 0 0 0 0 10 Pomoxis spp. (crappie) B 0 0 0 0 0 1 Netemigonus crysoleuca) (golden shiner) D 0 0 0 0 0 1 Moxostoma macrolepidotum (northern red horse) C 0 0 0 0 0 1 Average Actual Ecological Use -----t — D D B D D B Potential Ecological Use(l) — A A D D A A Potential ecological use is the highest level a stream can attain based on long term low stream flow and habitat (Barr, 1998a) Ecological uses include: Class A, cold water fish Class B, warm water sport fish Class C, intolerant forage fish Class D, tolerant forage fish Class E, tolerant macroinvertebrates 206495.wpd E -94 x012:20IN -T o :t=1T1FTi2:f: =9I�ia'� :I 3 -22 c. O V W 1 Nine Mile Creek Ecological Use Main Stem at Marsh Lake Dam 1974 -1998 C7A 0 Jan -74 Jul -77 Feb -81 Sep -84 Mar -88 Oct -91 May -95 Dec -98 Figure 38 0 I S D = Tolerant E = Very Tole Dinvertebrates I 1 1 1-77 Fab-A, ju risn I— Aquatic I ep-84 IV Finme: 0 Lill RRO%%ff_C Ir7;M!j: Aquatic Macroinvertebrates and Biotic Indices Benthic macroinvertebrate identifications directly indicate the condition of biota at the base of the aquatic food chain and indirectly indicate the stream water quality related to stormwater runoff. The benthic community is exposed to the temporal variations in stream water quality and "integrates" the quality of passing water. With the addition of ecological use monitoring stations in 1997, macroinvertebrates were sampled at all seven ecological use stations rather than the four biological stations used in past years. Species identifications and enumerations are summarized in Table 19. Macroinvertebrate community data was used to calculate biotic indices (Methods are discussed in the methods section "Analysis of Water Quality Using Biotic Indices" of this Appendix E of this Nine Mile Creek 1998 Annual Report). The HBI and ICI for the seven stations are compared in Figure 40. The ICI -based index provides a second opinion on the biological monitoring results. ICI uses a scale of zero to 60, with 60 being the highest possible water quality. HBI uses a scale 'of zero to 10, with zero being high water quality and 10 being low water quality. The indices are scaled to show improving water quality with increasing bar height, the HBI scale is on the left and the ICI scale is on the right. As described in the methods section, the HBI is an indicator of organic pollution, whereas the ICI - based index is more indicative of overall water quality. ICI and HBI scores show a similar relative ranking of the monitoring stations. Both indices show that the upper North Fork (ECU -2) and lower main stem (ECU -7B and ECU -7C) have relatively better water quality than the other stations. Both indices further show that the lower South Fork (ECU -5A) has a lower water quality than all other sample locations. As of the 1998 monitoring, there is a 23 -year record of aquatic macroinvertebrates in Nine Mile Creek. Despite the change in macroinvertebrate monitoring stations in 1997, three of the ecological use stations are located close to three of the historical stations (the exception being the Valley View Road station); therefore, the HBI for the three new ecological use stations are included in a time series plot showing the historical HBI since 1976 by station (Figure 41). The long -term record of HBI indicates very little significant change in the water quality at each of the stations.' Improved water quality in the North Fork Station at Cahill Road (ECU -2) in 1998 reversed a 1992 through 1997 trend of declining HBI values (Figure 41). The results of an analysis to determine ' The 1995 and 1996 HBI values are different here than in the 1995 and 1996 Nine Mile Creek annual reports because an error in the Hilsenhoff tolerance values for two species were found and corrected while reexamining the HBI calculations for 1997. The HBI values for the North Fork at Cahill Road and Main - Stem at 106th Street were significantly lowered as a result of the correction. The changes had no effect on the ICI. 206495.wpd E -98 I 4 3 R - the cause of declining North Fork HBI values indicated increased average turbidity (i.e., increased organic pollution) and a subsequent decline in dissolved oxygen during 1992 through 1997 resulted in the increase of more tolerant benthic macroinvertebrates (Barr, 1998b). An analysis of 1998 water quality data indicates a high turbidity value following an August rainstorm resulted in an increase in average annual turbidity at all North Fork locations during 1998. However, North Fork dissolved oxygen values were similar during 1997 and 1998 and less tolerant benthic macroinvertebrates were collected from the North Fork location in 1998. Although the 1998 grab samples indicated decline in the water quality of the North Fork may have occurred, the 1998 benthic community data indicated the stream's water quality improved. The data provide confirmation of the value of the average annual water quality data provided by the benthic community. Grab samples provide periodic "snapshots" of water quality, but do not provide a continuous record of water quality. The benthic community "integrates" the quality of passing water and, consequently, indicates the average annual water quality of the stream. A comparison of 1997 and 1998 HBI values indicates a significant decline in water quality occurred in the downstream portion of the Main Stem (i.e., Station ECU -7C) during 1998. Differences in HBI values between years that are greater than 0.84 are considered statistically significant (Narf et al., 1984). Hence, a difference of 0.9 in 1997 (HBI = 5.0) and 1998 (HBI = 5.9) HBI values at Station ECU -7C was considered statistically significant. Other sample locations noted 1997 and 1998 HBI differences of 0.2 to 0.5, indicating no significant differences in water quality occurred at these locations. A comparison of historical year -to -year changes in HBI values indicates that the water quality of Nine Mile Creek has been relatively stable during the 1976 through 1998 period. Approximately 80 percent of the year -to -year changes in Nine Mile Creek HBI values during this period were not statistically significant (Table 20). Of the 17 statistically significant changes, nine indicated water quality improvement and eight indicated water quality degradation. The data indicate the water quality of the South Fork of Nine Mile Creek has been more stable than other sample locations, noting only one significant change during the period of record. The data suggest the water quality k of the downstream location on the Main Stem (at 106th St. Bridge, ECU -7C) has been the least stable, noting seven statistically significant changes during the period of record. Four of the changes at this location have been indicative of water quality degradation and three of the changes have been indicative of water quality improvement. It appears that the statistically significant degradation noted in the downstream reach of the Main Stem during 1998 is indicative of the variability observed at this location throughout the period of record. 206495.wpd E -99 Table 19. Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Aquatic Macroinvertebrate Identifications Collected October 5, 1998 Number of Specimens by Station Taxa ECU -2 ECU -2A ECU-3A ECU-5A ECU -7A ECU -713 ECU -7C INSECTA Co e 1 o e P t ra beetles <;: r; c:<:::>>>:::.:> �rE.;.>::::<::::::;::>:.;:.> .;:» ..>: aa:: i�::>:::::: >::::. >�.:.::..:; >�;�.;....:::: > .::.: ..........: ....: Dryopidae Helichus (adults) ::.... Dytiscidae ...:::::.:.:::::.::... Laccophilus (adult) ;.: . :' X. Dytiscidae (adults) 1 2 Neobidessus a ( dolts) .::::::..:::.:.::: •: .;•.:....::: • Elmidae Dubiraphia (adults) ....... Dubiraphia (larvae) 3 4 Stenelmis (adults) j... '.. .... 3 ......: ;:»::::r; E::`::>:;::` :::.::::::::. >:.» Stenelmis (larvae) ... 6 2 3 Hali I' idae ............................... X ....................................::'.::::................................................._........................... s? `E # #;iE# > E ii EE EEE? Etii'[ i> > > .. X. >'' >EEls E E ? ?< < if: >E ii!% iiiii ii >; i ;i #i;':E> »;' < Peltodytes (adults) .....................,........, H dr o hilida e Y P ............................................................................<.;;:.;';.;;:.................................. X. Enochrus(adults) ............................... Diptera (true flies) Athericidae 2 4 15 3 4 4. Athe ' rrz iv ae Chironomidae Ceratopogomdae Rheotanytarsus (larvae) TanYP odinae Tanypodinae (pupae) 3 Tan Jn a r s mi ` Chironomidae (larvae) 4 11 24 33 37 21 C I ironomi dae (P u P a ) Culicidae Anopheles (larvae) + :<:. S. Psychodidae 91 Simulud e a Simuliidae pupae 3 53 Tab avid a e Chrysops 1 71 P u' ltdae Tipula 2 Uni deni t Pied her ' Hi ' D i tera 9 P p emeroptera (mayflies) Baetidae Baetis b runneicolor (nymphs) ...... 12 ..... 17 trrcau da tus/ : : i:.i.........' s' . .Baefs i.. i ?` ?»jj:S brunneicolor (nymphs) ::::: ::.. . . .. ,.._....... ...............i....._.....:.: .. :.. : ;.::.. :::.: :. ...., » Baefs favistriga (nymphs) 13 38 ..;.:.:..:...::.r .::.; ..;.> .>.::....;:..;..: . 445 ..`.i 160 Baetis fondalis (nymphs) X. Baetis intercalaris 6 3 Unidentifiable Bactis (nymphs) # X. 206495.wpd E -100 Table 19. Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Aquatic Macroinvertebrate Identifications Collected October 5, 1998 (cont.) Number of Specimens by Station Taxa ECU -2 ECU -2A ECU-3A ECU -5A ECU -7A ECU -713 ECU -7C Caenidae Belostoma (adults) "`<:1:::: ^ >::: ?;' : : Corixidae (adults) 1 Trichon- (adults) Nepidae Ranatra (nymphs) :. Pleidae Neoplea (nymphs) Lepidoptera (moths and butterflies) P Y ralidae Acentria (nymphs) 1 3 M alo e eg pt ra a d l I erflied dobso nflres fis hflies 1 Sialidae Siali s (nymphs) Trichoptera (caddisflies) H dro s h' Y P Yc idae Hydropsyche a tteni (lary ae) ::.......:.:.::..:.:...:..::.:.::.:....::.:...:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:...:.:..:.:: .3..1..:.:..:.:.:..::.:.:_::.....:.::,:..: 3...5..:.:.: ....:.:.:.::............., .......... 13 H r o h s e moms a group (Zarvae) ..3..2.................................. Hydropsyche sparna (larvae) 1 Ceratopsyrhe slossonae (larvae) Cheumatopsyche (larvae) 185 26 18 13 35 1.3.. Unidenti able h ro s hidaeK. flarvae) ...... .:3 ...................:.:::::::::. p dae 206495.wpd E -101 Table 19. Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Aquatic Macroinvertebrate Identifications Collected October 5, 1998 (cont.) 206495.wpd E -102 Number of Specimens by Station Taxa ECU -2 ECU -2A ECU-3A ECU -5A ECU -7A ECU -7B ECU -7C Calopterygidae Calo to rym (nymphs ...:.........:::....:..:...:..::...:.. :::.:::..:...:.::::.....: ;...., Coenagdonidae 4 Ischnura/Bnallagma (nymphs) Ischnura (nymphs) 1 ARACHNIDA : , .:::......:...::. . Spiders ANNELIDA i Hrudinea .. ...:..: .. Oligochaeta 4 11 3 1 BRYO ZOA COELENTERATA Hydra :. :.:...: ,.., :..::..., CRUSTACEA Amphipoda Gammaridae a G mmarvs Talitridae H alella azteca Y EE'.:. .`..`''...' ?<- ;.,,Eiiiii5'ii i' ?::'Eii`>i ii;i >i:.:` >iii Cladocera 1200 1 Copepods xx Decapoda O strac oda Iso P oda : , .. ......................... Le r ceus MOLLUSCA Gastropods > . Ancylidae Ferrisia a XX Physidae Physa:. ..:. Unidentified snails Unidentified slug Pelecypoda p aedidae 9 8 :. TURBELLARIA (flatworms) Du9esia" type 206495.wpd E -102 Table 20 Statistically Significant Changes In Nine Mile Creek Water Quality During 1976 through 1998 Indicated by Year- to-Year Changes In IiBI Values Year South Fork at Valley View Road North Fork at Cahill Road Main Stem at Marsh Lake Outlet Main Stem at 106th St. Bridge 1977 - - Significant Degradation Significant Degradation 1978 - Significant Improvement Significant Improvement _ 1979 - 1980 - - Significant Improvement Significant Improvement 1981 - 1982 - 1983 - 1984 - Significant Improvement 1985 - Significant Degradation 1986 - - NS _ 1987 - Significant Improvement NS _ 1988 - 1989 Significant Degradation - - Significant Degradation 1990 - Significant Degradation - _ 1991 - Significant Improvement - _ 1992 - - - Significant Improvement 1993 - - - Significant Degradation 1994 - - - Significant Improvement 1995 - _ 1996 - _ 1997 1998 - - - Significant Degradation - No significant change NS Not Sampled 206495.wpd E -103 0 High Quality 0 2 4 m 2 6 8 10 Low Quality 1998 Nine Mile Creek HBI and ICI -Based Indices 1 2A 3A 5A 7A EUC Station Figure 40 P•9av7 On ,akoneu.ES""' "" 3198."" 7B 7C High Quality >0 ►0 .0 U 0 0 0 Low Quality 3.5 4.5 5.5 6.5 7.5 8.5 Nine Mile Creek HBI, 1976 -1998 HBI for Upstream Sites —zns-- South Fork at Valley View Road --m— North Fork at Cahill Road r-------------------------- - - - - -- r - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - /- r------- r---- -� - - --v -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - -- --- --- --- -- -- -- - ECU2 - - -- -------- - - - - - -- --------- - - - - -- ^----------- - - - - -I -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7R 77 70 70 an o-9 on nn n. .... _ _ . _ .... ... °J ° YEAR o ou VU W1 9z 93 94 95 96 97 98 HBI for Main Stem 3.5 — Main Stem at Marsh Lake Outlet w— Main Stem at 106th St. Bridge 4.5 -------------------------------- ECU7 5.5�� -., - - -- --- ----- -------------------- 6.5 - -- - - -- - -- - - -- 7.5 - - - -- ECU7A -------------------------------- 8.5 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 Hilsenhoff Biotic Index (HBI) is a measure of organic pollution and dissolved oxygen availability in streams based on indicator species of,benthic invertebrates. A higher HBI indicates a greater tolerance to low dissolved oxygen and, thus, lower water quality. In 1998, seven stations were sampled for fish and macro invertebrates. ECU2 was proximal to Cahill Road and Brook Drive, ECU7A was proximal to Marsh Lake Outlet, and ECU7C was proximal to 106th Street station. No station in 1998 was comparable to Valley View Road, although the South Fork was represented by ECU3A. P.%2TQ7WOMgMILESTRW BIMD9. W 82 Figure 41 E -105 Periphyton Study The results of the periphyton growth studies show a wide range of biomass over time at the three stations: ECU -2A, ECU -5A, AND ECU -7A. The chlorophyll a concentrations (on an areal basis) are shown in Figure 42. The North. Fork location (ECU -2A) observed a much slower (but consistent) growth rate as evidenced by the more shallow increase in biomass (measured by chlorophyll) than the other stream locations. Hence, the North Fork location appears to be less productive than the South Fork and Main Stem locations. The chlorophyll a in ECU -7A increased during weeks 1 through week 3, then declined slightly from week 3 through week 4. The suspected cause of the. decline is the removal of periphyton by scour during and following a 2.5 -inch rainstorm occurring during this period. This station appears to be more productive and more affected by scouring than North Fork and South Fork locations. In ECU -5A, chlorophyll a increased from week 1 to week 2, then gradually decreased from week 2 through week 4. The decline in periphyton growth occurred concurrently with a decline in discharge and a subsequent reduction in phosphorus mass within the stream. The data indicate higher stream productivity occurs following runoff events, when stream flow and phosphorus mass are at higher levels than baseflow levels. Table 21 shows the calculated soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP) based on the periphyton growth rates. Measured SRP and total phosphorus (TP) are included for comparison. The calculated SRPs are not correlated with measured SRP or'TP. The lack of meaningful patterns in these data and calculations suggest that either: (1) this method of assessing bioavailable phosphorus may not work in Nine Mile Creek, or (2) bioavailable phosphorus may fluctuate widely during the sampling period resulting in poor correlations between grab samples (i.e., instantaneous phosphorus measurement) and periphyton growth (i.e., integrate phosphorus concentrations throughout the study period). Even though the value of phosphorus predictions from this method is uncertain, periphyton biomass data provide supportive evidence when assessing changes in the invertebrate community. The periphyton biomass data provide an overall indication of stream productivity, available food for invertebrates living. within the stream, and changes in the invertebrates' food supply. When using invertebrate data to determine whether stream water quality changes have occurred, periphyton data are useful to rule out the possibility that changes in the invertebrate community were caused by changes in their food supply rather than water quality changes. 206495.wpd E -106 r O V Periphyton Chlorophyll a from 1998 Periphyton Monitoring Stations 1] N 60 E 40 cz 020 0 �- 08 -Jun PA23\27100MM•ECUTERICALC. WB2 16 -Jun Date Figure 42 ECU2A ECUSA V ECU7A 24 -Jun 30-Jun r O 00 Table 21 Calculated Soluble Reactive Phosphorus Based on Periphyton Growth Rates -- - - WTCF= see below ---- --- ----------------- - --- Nmax= 3.65 Kp= 7 Used "tools \numeric tools \optimizer" to solve u" by optimizing SRP ( "Calculated SRP") WTCF WEEK ENDING 2A 5A 7A 6/8/98 6/15/98 6/22/98 6/29/98 P.92312710 M9WECUIPERICALC.WB2 0.646429 0.57823 0.618705 0.682143 0.67347 0.7374101 0.775 0.82313 0.8561151 0.792857 0.84014 0.8669065 Amax= Nmax= Amax= 2A 5A 7A 5.09 5.57 5.03 Calculated Measured Site ECU2A Week 0 1 2 3 4 date 06/01/98 06/08/98 06/15/98 06122198 06/29/98 Chl -a m2 0 4.55 14.5 22.7 26.79 Julian Da 152 159 166 173 180 1/d 0.22 0.17 0.06 0.02 PP (d) 1.36 1.36 1.36 1.36 1/d 0.16 0.12 0.05 0.02 1/d 0.25 0.18 0.06 0.02 p" solved 1/d 0.25 0.18 0.06 0.02 SRP 0.361 0.256 0.083 0.028 SRP m L 0.014 0.006 0.006 0.011 TP m 0.093 0.039 0.061 0.073 TSS m L 13 7 11 9 Discharge cfs 11.2 5.5 5.4 5 ECUSA 1 2 3 4 06/01/98 06/08/98 06/15/98 06/23/98 06/29/98 0 15.18 66.78 62.56 58.63 152 159 166 174 180 0.39 0.21 -0.01 -0.01 1.36 1.36 1.36 1.36 0.29 0.16 -0.01 -0.01 0.49 0.23 -0.01 -0.01 0.49 0.23 -0.01 -0.01 0.675 0.301 -0.013 -0.013 0.037 0.016 0.033 0.045 0.085 0.051 0.074 0.089 8 <5 <5 <5 19.2 2.6 3.8 3.4 ECUM 0 1 2 3 4 06101/98 06108/98 06/15/98 06/22/98 06/29198 0 0.55 23.95 75.36 67.45 152 159 166 173 180 -0.09 0.54 0.16 -0.02 1.36 1.36 1.36 1.36 -0.06 0.40 0.12 -0.01 -0.10 0.54 0.14 -0.01 -0.06 0.54 0.14 -0.01 -0.083 0.842 0.200 -0.014 0.050 0.022 0.029 0.049 0.098 0.064 0.059 0.089 . <5 8 7 <5 31 5.6 15.1 13.3 -- - - WTCF= see below ---- --- ----------------- - --- Nmax= 3.65 Kp= 7 Used "tools \numeric tools \optimizer" to solve u" by optimizing SRP ( "Calculated SRP") WTCF WEEK ENDING 2A 5A 7A 6/8/98 6/15/98 6/22/98 6/29/98 P.92312710 M9WECUIPERICALC.WB2 0.646429 0.57823 0.618705 0.682143 0.67347 0.7374101 0.775 0.82313 0.8561151 0.792857 0.84014 0.8669065 Amax= Nmax= Amax= 2A 5A 7A 5.09 5.57 5.03 Conclusions and Recommendations Water quality data collected during 1968 through 1998 and biological data collected during 1976 through 1998 indicate the water quality of Nine Mile Creek has remained relatively stable over time. In 1998, as in previous years, some parameter variability was noted: • Macroinvertebrate data indicate a significant decline in water quality occurred during 1998 i at Main Stem Station ECU -7C. Historical data indicate seven statistically significant changes have occurred at this location, four indicative of water quality degradation and three indicative of water quality improvement. Hence, the 1998 change appears to be indicative of the variability observed at this location throughout the period of record. f • The lower reach of the main stem (Station 8) observed the lowest chloride and specific conductance values of the period of record on August 3, 1998 following a 2.11 -inch rainstorm. • The upper reach of the North Fork (Station 1) observed the highest average turbidity value of the period of record in 1998. The high average resulted from a high measurement on August 3 following a 2.11 -inch rainstorm. • The lower reaches of the South Fork (Station 6) and Main Stem observed the highest flow values of the period of record during April of 1998. Stormwater. runoff added to the stream near the time of measurement is the apparent cause of the high values. Nine Mile Creek water quality during periods of storm runoff is likely to be degraded because of the pollutants conveyed by urban runoff. Most of the samples for long term monitoring have been collected during dry weather. To assess the extent of existing runoff water quality problems within the District, the NMCWD has included the monitoring of benthic aquatic invertebrates in its water quality program. Monitoring for the presence or absence of biological indicator organisms provides indirect evidence of the effects of transitory changes in stream water quality related to storm runoff. Benthic aquatic invertebrates are exposed to -all the temporal variations in stream water quality and "integrate" the quality of passing water. The presence of pollution - tolerant organisms and the absence of pollution- sensitive organisms indicate adverse water quality impacts of urban runoff better than do grab samples. i 206495.wpd E -109 I The results of the 1998 biological monitoring program suggest the water quality of Nine Mile Creek ranges from good to poor, depending on the stream reach. The lower main stem reach at ECU -7B exhibited the best water quality (good). The lower South Fork reach exhibited the poorest water quality (poor). The North Fork stream reaches and the lower main stem reaches at ECU -7A and ECU -7C exhibited fair water quality. The results of the 1998 periphyton monitoring program indicated the North Fork location was the least productive'and the Main Stem location was the most productive location. The productivity of the South Fork location appeared to be affected by stormwater runoff. Consequently, higher stream productivity occurred following runoff events, when stream flow and phosphorus mass were at higher levels than baseflow levels. 1998 data from ecological use stations indicate the data were similar to 1997 data and to the historical data used in the ecological use classification of Nine Mile Creek. The data are confirming evidence that the recommendations made in the Nine Mile Creek Use Attainability Analysis (Barr, 1998a) were appropriate and valuable for use by the District in managing the stream. 1998 fisheries data were generally similar to historical data. The data indicated the stream's actual ecological use in all but two locations were lower than the stream's potential ecological use. The South Fork Station ECU -5A observed a higher actual ecological use than the stream's potential use. The Main Stem Station ECU -7A observed actual and potential ecological uses that were the same. Data from other locations indicated degrading impacts of stormwater runoff have resulted in a lower actual than potential use. 1998 was the thirty -first year of water quality monitoring on Nine Mile Creek. Monitoring should continue at the specified stations to maintain this long -term record of water quality and biota in Nine Mile Creek and to provide the managers with continued guidance for management of the stream. 206495.wpd E -110 References Ball, J. 1982. Stream Classification Guidelines for Wisconsin. Technical Bulletin. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison, Wisconsin. Ball, J. 1997. Personal Communication. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison, Wisconsin. Barr Engineering Company. 1998a. Nine Mile Creek Use Attainability Analysis. Prepared for Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. January 12, 1998. Barr Engineering Company. 1998b. 1997 Engineer's Annual Report. Prepared for Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. May 1998. Barr Engineering Company. 1996. Nine Mile Creek Watershed District —Water Management Plan. Prepared for Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. May 1996. DeShon, J.E., 1995. Development and Application of the Invertebrate Community Index (ICI). • Pages 217 -243 in W.S. Davis and T.P. Simon (editors). Biological Assessment and Criteria, Tools for Water Resource Planning and Decision- Making. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida. Hilsenhoff, W.L., 1982. Using a Biotic Index to Evaluate Water Quality in Streams. Techn. Bull., 132. Dep. Nat. Resour. Madison, Wisconsin. 22 pages. Hilsenhoff, W.L., 1987. An Improved Biotic Index of Organic Stream Pollution. The Great Lakes Entomologist. pp. 31 -39. Hilsenhoff, W.L., 1994. Personal Communication. Jones, P.J. and B.A. Jeffrey. 1992. Environmental impact of road salting. In D'Itri, F.M. Chemical deicers and the environment. Lewis Publishers, Inc., Ann Arbor, MI 585 pp. Narf, R. P., E.L. Lange, and R.C. Wildman. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Applying Hilsenhoffs Biotic Index. Journal of Freshwater Ecology, Volume 2, Number 5, pp. 441 -448. i 206495.wpd E -111 3 i } 8 2 4 0 Appendix C Well Logs of Municipal Wells (from MGS CW I database) N: MINNESOTA COUNTY WELL INDEX. UN.NO. /CO. : 200561/27 ENTERED: 1991/08/24 NAME : EDINA 4 UPDATED: 1991/09/11 COUNTY : T/R /SEC. : HENNEPIN 28 /24 /19BCDAAA USE MUNICIPAL DRILLED: DEPTH 500 FT. DEPTH D: 1950/00/00 500 FT. ELEVATION: 890 FT.(TOPO ) CASED 266 FT. GROUT : DIAN. : 16 IN. DRL /DS 27058 :BERGERSON- CASWELL LOC.METH.: LOC.BY MGS COORDS.: STATUS : ACTIVE WHPA DNR PA #: 73 -1119 DPTH BDRK: 80 FT. BEDROCK: PLATTEVILLE OPEN HOLE: PRAIRIE DU CHIEN GROUP - JORDAN AQUIFER : MULTIPLE ADDRESS : 5420 CONCORD + SOUTHVIEW LM. , EDINA , MN E QUAD(7.5): MINNEAPOLIS SOUTH CONTACT: CWI /WL: YES CWI /WC: NO CORE /CTTNGS /GP.: DATE ---- - - - NITRATE BACTERIA SOURCE SWL ELEV SOURCE - -- 1973/03/01 - - - - - -- -- - - - - <1. -- - - - - - -- - - - -- - - -- MUNI - - - - - -- 1950/00/00 80 810 COMMENTS: CASING: 024 TO 0079;016 TO 0266. EDINA NO. 4 G.W.Q. NO.0202 ************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** MINNESOTA COUNTY WELL INDEX. UN.NO. /CO. : 200564 /27 ENTERED: 1991/08/24 NAME . : EDINA 6 UPDATED: 1991/09/11 ' COUNTY : HENNEPIN USE MUNICIPAL DRILLED: 1954/07/07 T/R /SEC. : 28 /24 /19CBBDAC DEPTH 503 FT. DEPTH D: 503 FT. ELEVATION: 900 FT.(TOPO ) CASED 316 FT. GROUT DIAM. : 16 IN. DRL /DS 62010 LOC.METH.: LOC.BY MGS COORDS.: STATUS ACTIVE WHPA DNR PA,#: 73 -1119 DPTH BDRK: 94 FT. BEDROCK: PLATTEVILLE OPEN HOLE: PRAIRIE DU CHIEN GROUP - JORDAN AQUIFER MULTIPLE ADDRESS HWY 100 AT HIGHSCHOO LM: , EDINA , MN QUAD(7.5): MINNEAPOLIS SOUTH CONTACT: CWI /WL: YES CWI /WC: NO CORE /CTTNGS /GP.: DATE NITRATE BACTERIA SOURCE SWL ELEV SOURCE ---- - - - - -- 1973/01/01 - - - - - -- -- - - - - <1. -- - - - - - -- - MUNI - - -- - - -- - - - - - -- 1954/07/07 90 810 1954/06/00 90 810 COMMENTS: CASING: 024 TO 0096;016 TO 0316. EDINA NO. 6 ************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** MINNESOTA COUNTY WELL INDEX. UN.NO. /CO. : 200913/27 NAME : EDINA 114, CITY OF COUNTY : HENNEPIN LOCAL ID : T/R /SEC. : 116/21/ 7DAD ELEVATION: 848 FT.(TOPO DIAM. : 16 IN. LOC.METH.: STATUS : ACTIVE DPTH BDRK: 182 FT. OPEN HOLE: JORDAN AQUIFER : JORDAN ENTERED: 1991/08/24 UPDATED: 1995/10/11 USE : MUNICIPAL DRILLED: 1963/12/02 PERMIT : CJDN PER.TYP: DEPTH 420 FT. DEPTH D: 420 FT. CASED 325 FT. GROUT : SWUDS OBWELL: YES DRL /DS : 96460 :MUELLER WELL CO. LOC.BY : USGS COORDS.: MANUAL EST WHPA SOURCE DNR PA#: 73 -1119 BEDROCK: PRAIRIE DU CHIEN GROUP ADDRESS : BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE LM. , EDINA , MN QUAD(7.5): EDEN PRAIRIE CONTACT: CWI /WL: YES CWI /WC: NO CORE /CTTNGS /GP.: CUTTINGS IGWIS : SWUDS OBWELL: YES DATE ---- - NITRATE BACTERIA SOURCE SWL ELEV SOURCE - - - -- 1988/09/27 - - - - - -- -- - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - -- 58.56 - - -- 789 - - - - - -- USGS 1988/08/24 61.63 786 USGS 1988/04/06 48.89 799 USGS 1987/11/10 51.07 797 USGS 1987/09/30 61.03 787 USGS 1987/09/01 59.48 789 USGS 1987/06/30 60.38 788 USGS 1987/03/06 48.70 799 USGS 1986/12/05 49.15 799 USGS 1986/09/11 51.47 797 USGS 1986/07/22 58.27 790 USGS 1973/03/01 <1. MUNI 1964/02/00 38 810 COMMENTS: CASING: 024 TO 0182;016 TO 0325. ************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** ************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** MINNESOTA.COUNTY WELL INDEX. UN.NO. /CO. : 200914 /27 ENTERED: 1991/08/24 NAME : EDINA 17 UPDATED: 1995/10/11 COUNTY : HENNEPIN USE MUNICIPAL DRILLED: 1970/11/17 T/R /SEC. : 28 /24 /19DBDAAC DEPTH 461 FT. DEPTH D: 461 FT. ELEVATION: 873 FT.(TOPO ) CASED 373 FT. GROUT DIAM. : 24 IN. DRL /DS : 62012 :KEYS WELL CO. LOC.METH.: INFO.OWNER LOC.BY : MGS COORDS.: STATUS ACTIVE WHPA DNR PAI: 73 -111 DPTH BDRK: 133 FT. BEDROCK: ST.PETER OPEN HOLE: JORDAN AQUIFER : JORDAN ADDRESS : 59 59THAND VIEW ST LM.', EDINA , MN QUAD(7.5): MINNEAPOLIS SOUTH CONTACT: CWI /WL: YES CWI /WC: NO CORE /CTTNGS /GP.: CUTTINGS DATE NITRATE BACTERIA SOURCE SWL ELEV SOURCE - - - - - ---- - - - - --- - - -- -- ----- ---- ------- 1970/11/17 59 814 62012 COMMENTS: M.G.S. NO.633 f p, J Y * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * MINNESOTA COUNTY WELL INDEX /WELL LOG. UN.NO. /CO. : 204884/27 NAME EDINA 8 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- WELL CONSTRUCTION. [GROUT----------- - - - - -] DIAM(IN) FROM(FT) TO(FT) MATERIAL AMNT UNITS CASING 1 24 219 CASING 2 V 16 232 SCREEN: DATA UNAVAILABLE. PUMP : DATA UNAVAILABLE. ----------------------------------------- ---------------------------------- PUMPAGE TEST(S). STATIC WATER LEVEL: 49 FT. DATE: LEVEL(FT) HOURS GPM DRAWDOWN(FT) ---- - - - - -- - - - -- - - -- ------ - - - - -- TEST 1: 82 1200 33.0 --------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- DRILLER S /GEOLOGIC LOG --------------- DEPTH - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- -------- --- - -- - -- -- - - - -- -- --------------- - INTERVAL DRILLERS DESCRIPTION COLOR HARDNESS [EL.TOP ] --- - - - - -- [INTERPRETED LITHOLOGY ---=------------------------------------------------- ][CODE][STRATIGRAPHIC UNITS) - - - - -- ] [AGE] - - - -- 18 CLAY [ ] [CLAY ][QTUU][TILL ] [QUA] 18 40 CLAY, SAND & BOULDERS [ 852] [CLAY, SAND, BOULDER ][QTUU][TILL J [QUA] 40 60 HARD SAND & STONES [ 830] [SAND, PEBBLES ][QFUU][SAND ] [QUA] 60 100 SANDY CLAY & BOULDERS [ 810] [CLAY, BOULDER, SAND ][QTUU][TILL ] [QUA] 100 157 MUDDY SAND, GRAVEL & STONES [ 770] [SAND, GRAVEL, PEBBLES ][QFUU][SAND ] [QUA] 157 173 SAND & GRAVEL [ 713] [SAND, GRAVEL ][QFUU][SAND ] [QUA] 173 191 CLAY. GRAY HARD [ 697] [CLAY ][QTUG][TILL,GRAY ] [QUA] 191 218 CLAY,.GRVL & LIMEROCK MIXED [ 679] [CLAY, GRAVEL, BOULDER J[QTUU][TILL ] [QUA] 218 220 BLUE & GRAY SHALE VARIED HARD [ 652] [SHALE, SILTSTONE ][OSTP][ST.PETER ] (ORD] 220 361 SHAKOPEE LIMEROCK [ 650] [DOLOMITE ][OPDC][PRAIRIE DU CHIEN GROUP ] [ORD] 361 364 SHALE & LIMEROCK MIXED [ 509] [SHALE, DOLOMITE ][OPDC][PRAIRIE DU CHIEN GROUP ] [ORD] 364 445 JORDAN SANDROCK [ 506] [SANDSTONE ][CJDN][JORDAN ] [CAM] 445 472 SHALE ST. LAWRENCE BLUE [ --------------------------------------------------------------------- 425] [SHALE, SILTSTONE ][CSTL][ST.LAWRENCE ] [CAM] - - - - -- ******************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** MINNESOTA COUNTY WELL INDEX /WELL LOG. UN.NO. /CO. : 206183/27 NAME EDINA 11 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- WELL CONSTRUCTION. DIAM(IN) FROM(FT) TO(FT) 1 -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- CASING 1 24 182 CASING 2 16 321 SCREEN: DATA UNAVAILABLE. [GROUT----------- - - - - -] MATERIAL AMNT UNITS PUMP --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATA UNAVAILABLE. PUMPAGE TEST(S). DRILLER S DESCRIPTION COLOR HARDNESS STATIC WATER LEVEL: 22 FT. EEL-TOP ] --- - - - - -- DATE: 1963/04/ I LEVEL(FT) HOURS GPM DRAWDOWN(FT) TEST 1: 60 1800 38.0 TEST 2: 59 2000 37.0 TEST 3: •. --------------------------------------------------------------------- 47 1320 25.0 - - - - -- DRILLER S /GEOLOGIC LOG DEPTH INTERVAL- DRILLER S DESCRIPTION COLOR HARDNESS EEL-TOP ] --- - - - - -- [INTERPRETED LITHOLOGY ----------------------------------------------------- ][CODE][STRATIGRAPHIC UNITS) - - - ] -- [AGE] 0 36 SAND AND GRAVEL - - - - -- [ 833] [SAND, GRAVEL ][QFUU][SAND ] [QUA] 36 45 CLAY AND ROCKS BLUE [ 797] [CLAY, COBBLE ][QTUG][TILL,GRAY ] [QUA] 45 75 SANDY CLAY BLUE [ 788] [CLAY, SAND ][QTUG][TILL,GRAY ] [QUA] 75 173 CLAY, SAND, GRAVEL & ROCKS BROWN [ 758] [CLAY, SAND, COBBLE ][QUUB][BROWN ] [QUA] 173 179 COARSE GRAVEL AND ROCKS DIRTY [ 660] [GRAVEL, COBBLE ][QFUU][SAND ] [QUA] 179 304 SHAKOPEE- ONEOTA LIMEROCK [ 654] [DOLOMITE ][OPDC][PRAIRIE DU CHIEN GROUP ) [ORD] 304 327 JORDAN SANDROCK COARSE M. HARD [ 5291 [SANDSTONE ][CJDN][JORDAN ] [CAM] 327 350 JORDAN SANDROCK M. HARD } [ 5061 [SANDSTONE ][CJDN][JORDAN ] [CAM] 350 362 JORDAN SANDROCK V. HARD [ 483] [SANDSTONE ][CJDN][JORDAN ] [CAM] 362 384 JORDAN SANDROCK MED. GRAINED M. HARD [ 4711 [SANDSTONE ][CJDN][JORDAN ] [CAM] 384 402 JORDAN SANDROCK SHALEY HARD [ 449] [SANDSTONE ][CJDN][JORDAN ] [CAM] j 402 403 ST. LAWRENCE SHALE [ --------------------------------------------------------------------- 431] [SHALE, DOLOMITE ][CSTL][ST.LAWRENCE ] [CAM] - - - - -- MINNESOTA COUNTY WELL INDEX /WELL LOG. UN.NO. /CO. : 206184/27 NAME EDINA 10 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- WELL CONSTRUCTION. [GROUT----------- - - - - -] DIAM(IN) FROM(FT) TO(FT) MATERIAL AMNT UNITS -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- - - -- - - - -- CASING 1 24 184 CASING 2 20 184 651 .t CASING 3 16 651 881 SCREEN: DATA UNAVAILABLE. PUMP --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATA UNAVAILABLE. DRILLER S /GEOLOGIC LOG PUMPAGE TEST(S). STATIC WATER LEVEL: 144 FT. COLOR HARDNESS DATE: 1963/06/ [EL.TOP ] --- - - - - -- LEVEL(FT) HOURS GPM DRAWDOWN(FT) TEST 1: ---- - - - - -- - - - -- 224 526 - - -- 1200 ------ - - - - -- 80.0 TEST 2: 199 900 55.0 ° TEST 3: --------------------------------------------------------------------- 280 2000 136.0 - - - - -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DRILLER S /GEOLOGIC LOG DEPTH INTERVAL DRILLER S DESCRIPTION COLOR HARDNESS [EL.TOP ] --- - - - - -- [INTERPRETED LITHOLOGY ----------------------------------------------------- ][CODE][STRATIGRAPHIC UNITS) - - - - -- ] [AGE] - - - -- 0 183 DRIFT [ 833] [DRIFT ][QUUU][PLEISTOCENE DEPOSIT ] [QUA] 183 305 SHAKOPEE- ONEOTA [ 650] [DOLOMITE ][OPDC][PRAIRIE DU CHIEN GROUP ] [ORD] 305 403 JORDAN SANDROCK [ 528] [SANDSTONE ][CJDN][JORDAN ] [CAM] 403 446 ST. LAWRENCE SHALE [ 430] [SHALE ][CSTL][ST.LAWRENCE ] [CAM] 446 592 FRANCONIA SHALE & SANDROCK [ 387] [SHALE, SANDSTONE ][CFRN][FRANCONIA ] [CAM] 592 653 GALESVILLE SANDROCK [ 241] [SANDSTONE ][CIGL][IR-ONTON- GALESVILLE ] [CAM] 653 664 GALESVILLE SANDROCK [ 180] [SHALE, SANDSTONE ][CECR][EAU CLAIRE ] [CAM] 664 729 EAU CLAIRE SHALE [ 169] [SHALE ][CECR][EAU CLAIRE ] [CAM] 729 876 MT. SIMON SANDROCK [ 104] [SANDSTONE ][CMTS][MT.SIMON ] [CAM] 876 1000 HINCKLEY SANDROCK [ -43] [SANDSTONE ][CMTS][MT.SIMON ] [CAM] 1000 1001 RED SHALE [ -167] [SHALE ][PMSC][SOLOR CHURCH FORMATION ] [PCM] ******************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** r t ******************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** MINNESOTA COUNTY WELL INDEX /WELL LOG. UN.NO. /CO. : 206377/27 NAME EDINA 5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ WELL CONSTRUCTION. [GROUT----------- - - - - -] DIAM(IN) FROM(FT) TO(FT) MATERIAL AMNT UNITS -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- - - -- - - - -- R CASING 1 24 136 CASING 2 20 200 CASING 3 16 257 SCREEN: DATA UNAVAILABLE. PUMP DATA UNAVAILABLE. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- PUMPAGE TEST(S). STATIC WATER LEVEL: 75 FT. DATE: 1954/00/ LEVEL(FT) HOURS GPM DRAWDOWN(FT) TEST 1: 90 1000 15.0 --------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- DRILLER S /GEOLOGIC LOG --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DEPTH INTERVAL DRILLER S DESCRIPTION COLOR HARDNESS [EL.TOP ] --- - - - - -- [INTERPRETED LITHOLOGY ----------------------------------------------------- ][CODE][STRATIGRAPHIC UNITS) - - - - -- ] [AGE] - - - -- 37 SAND & GRAVEL [ ] [SAND, GRAVEL ][QFUU][SAND ] [QUA] 37 84 CLAY [ 836] [CLAY ][QTUU][TILL J [QUA] 84 90 MUDDY SAND [ 789] [SAND, SILT. ][QFUU][SAND ] [QUA] 90 168 SAND & GRAVEL [ 7831 [SAND, GRAVEL ][QFUU][SAND ] [QUA] 168 180 SAND [ 705] [SAND ][QFUU][SAND ] [QUA] 180 185 SAND & GRAVEL [ 693] [SAND, GRAVEL ][QFUU][SAND ] [QUA] 185 190 SANDSTONE [ 688] [SAND ][QFUU][SAND ] [QUA] 190 200 CLAY [ 683] [CLAY ][Q`1'UU][TILL ] [QUA] 200 237 ST. PETER SANDSTONE [ 673] [SANDSTONE ][OSTP.][ST.PETER ] (ORD] 237 365 SHAKOPEE LIMEROCK [ 636] [DOLOMITE ][OPDC][PRAIRIE DU CHIEN GROUP ] (ORD] 365 443 JORDAN.SANDSTONE [ 508] [SANDSTONE ][CJDN][JORDAN ] [CAM] MINNESOTA COUNTY WELL INDEX. UN-NO. /CO. : 200918 /27 ENTERED: 1991/08/24 NAME : EDINA 18 UPDATED: 1995/10/11 COUNTY : HENNEPIN USE MUNICIPAL DRILLED: 1973/10/16 T/R /SEC. : 28 /24 /32BDACCD DEPTH 446 FT. DEPTH D: 446 FT. r ELEVATION: 855 FT.(TOPO ) CASED 365 FT. GROUT : DIAN. : 16 IN. DRL /DS 62012 :KEYS WELL CO. LOC.METH.: INFO.OWNER LOC.BY MGS COORDS.: STATUS ACTIVE WHPA DNR PAI: 73 -111 DPTH BDRK: 232 FT. BEDROCK: PRAIRIE DU'CHIEN GROUP OPEN HOLE: JORDAN AQUIFER : JORDAN ADDRESS : YORKAV AND 73RD ST LM. , EDINA , MN QUAD(7.5): BLOOMINGTON CONTACT: •_ CWI /WL: YES CWI /WC: NO CORE /CTTNGS /GP.: CUTTINGS DATE NITRATE BACTERIA SOURCE SWL ELEV SOURCE ---- - - - - -- 1973/10/16 - - - - - -- -- - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - -- - - -- 61 794 - - - - - -- 62012 COMMENTS: M.G.S. NO.945 I 1 s MINNESOTA COUNTY WELL INDEX. UN.NO. /CO. : 203101 /27 ENTERED: 1991/08/24 NAME : EDINA 16 UPDATED: 1995/10/11 COUNTY : HENNEPIN USE MUNICIPAL DRILLED: 1967/11/10 T/R /SEC. : 116/21/ 6ACABBB DEPTH 381 FT. DEPTH D: 381 FT. ELEVATION: 895 FT.(TOPO ) CASED 265 FT. GROUT. : DIAM. : 20 IN. DRL /DS : 27010 :LAYNE WELL CO. LOC.METH.: LOC.BY : MGS COORDS.: STATUS ACTIVE WHPA DNR PAI: 73 -1119 DPTH BDRK: FT. BEDROCK: NO RECORD z OPEN HOLE: PRAIRIE DU CHIEN GROUP — JORDAN AQUIFER : MULTIPLE ADDRESS : 1001 GLEASON RD. , EDINA , MN QUAD(7.5): HOPKINS CONTACT: CWI /WL: YES CWI /WC: NO CORE /CTTNGS /GP.: CUTTINGS DATE NITRATE BACTERIA SOURCE SWL ELEV SOURCE - - - - -- - - - - - -- -- - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - -- - - -- - - - - - -- 1967/11/10 66 829 COMMENTS: CASING: 030 TO 0215;020 TO 0265. M.G.S. NO.435 ************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** e; I ************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** MINNESOTA COUNTY WELL INDEX. UN.NO. /CO. : 203613/27 ENTERED: 1991/08/24 NAME : EDINA 13 UPDATED: 1991/09/11 COUNTY : HENNEPIN USE MUNICIPAL DRILLED: 1964/05/00 T/R /SEC. : 117 /21 /30BABBAA DEPTH 495 FT. DEPTH D: 495 FT. ELEVATION: 935 FT.(TOPO ) CASED 429 FT. GROUT DIAM. 16 IN. DRL /DS : 62012 :KEYS WELL CO. LOC.METH.: LOC.BY : MGS COORDS.: STATUS : ACTIVE WHPA DNR PA#: 73 -1119 DPTH BDRK: 104 FT. BEDROCK: PLATTEVILLE OPEN HOLE: JORDAN AQUIFER : JORDAN ADDRESS : BELMORE PARK , EDINA , MN QUAD(7.5): HOPKINS CONTACT: CWI /WL: YES CWI /WC: NO CORE /CTTNGS /GP.: DATE y---- - - - NITRATE BACTERIA SOURCE SWL ELEV SOURCE - -- 1973/03/01 - - - - - -- -- - - - <1. - -- - - - - - -- - - - -- - - -- MUNI - - - - - -- 1964/05/00 97 838 COMMENTS: CASING: 024 TO 0109;016 TO 0429. ************************************** i * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** MINNESOTA COUNTY WELL INDEX. i UN.NO. /CO. : 203614 /27 ENTERED: 1991/08/24 NAME : EDINA 12 UPDATED: 1991/09/11 COUNTY : HENNEPIN USE : MUNICIPAL DRILLED: 1964/05/00 T/R /SEC. : 117 /21 /30BABBAD DEPTH : 1080 FT. DEPTH D: 1080 FT. ELEVATION: 935 FT.(TOPO ) CASED 955 FT. GROUT DIAM. 16 IN. DRL /DS : 62012 :KEYS WELL CO. LOC.METH.: LOC.BY : MGS COORDS.: STATUS : ACTIVE WHPA DNR PAO: 73 -1119 DPTH BDRK: 109 FT. BEDROCK: PLATTEVILLE OPEN HOLE: MT.SIMON i AQUIFER : MT.SIMON ADDRESS : BELMORE PARK , EDINA , MN QUAD(7.5): HOPKINS CONTACT: CWI /WL: YES CWI /WC: NO CORE /CTTNGS /GP.: k DATE NITRATE BACTERIA SOURCE SWL ELEV SOURCE 1973/03/01 <1. MUNI 1964/05/00 252 683 COMMENTS: CASING: 024 TO 0116;016 TO 0955. ************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** 743 831 EAU CLAIRE [ 1921 [SANDSTONE, SHALE, SILTSTON][CECR][EAU CLAIRE ] [] MINNESOTA COUNTY WELL INDEX. UNIQUE NO.: 203614 (CONTINUED) 831 984 MT. SIMON [ 104] [SANDSTONE ][CMTS][MT.SIMON ] [CAM] 984 1079 HINCKLEY [ -49] [SANDSTONE ][CMTS][MT.SIMON ] [] 1079 1080 RED CLASTICS [ -144] [SHALE, SILTSTONE PMSU MID.PROTEROZOIC SEDIMEN PCM -------- - - - - -- 1 i MINNESOTA COUNTY WELL INDEX /WELL LOG. UN.NO. /CO. : 206474/27 NAME EDINA 7 -- GEO_INTRP: MGS--------- - - - - -- GEOLGST: BB - -- METHOD -_ GEO_STUDY<1_100K-- WELL CONSTRUCTION. CASNG MATERIAL: STEEL JOINTNG: TOP: FT. [GROUT------------ - - - - -] DIAM(IN) FROM(FT) TO(FT) MATERIAL AMNT UNITS - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- - - -- - - - -- CASING 1 24 0 148 CASING 2 16 0 350 SCREEN. PRESENT ?: NO OPEN HOLE FROM: 350 FT. TO: 547FT. PUMP : DATA UNAVAILABLE. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- PUMPAGE TEST(S). DRILLER S DESCRIPTION COLOR HARDNESS STATIC WATER LEVEL: 112 FT. [EL.TOP ] --- - - - - -- DATE: 1955/03/ ][CODE][STRATIGRAPHIC UNITS) - - - - -- LEVEL(FT) HOURS GPM DRAWDOWN(FT) TEST 1: 137 1040 25.0 TEST 2: 148 1471 36.0 TEST 3: --------------------------------------------------------------------- 159 1809 47.0 - - - - -- DRILLER S /GEOLOGIC LOG DEPTH INTERVAL DRILLER S DESCRIPTION COLOR HARDNESS [EL.TOP ] --- - - - - -- [INTERPRETED LITHOLOGY ----------------------------------------------------- ][CODE][STRATIGRAPHIC UNITS) - - - - -- ] [AGE] - - - -- 0 18 CLAY [ 950] [CLAY ][QTUU][TILL ] [QUA] 18 35 SAND + GRAVEL [ 932] [SAND, GRAVEL ][QFUU][SAND ] [QUA] 35 78 CLAY [ 915] [CLAY ][QTUU][TILL ] [QUA] 78 132 SAND [ 872] [SAND ][QFUU][SAND ] [QUA] 132 159 LIMEROCK [ 818] [LIMESTONE ][OPVL][PLATTEVILLE ] [ORD] 159 162 SOAPSTONE [ 791] [SHALE ][OGWD][GLENWOOD ] [ORD] } 162 290 SANDROCK [ 788] [SANDSTONE ][OSTPJ[ST.PETER ] [ORD] 290 324 SANDROCK + SHALE [ 660] [SANDSTONE, SHALE ][OSTP][ST.PETER ] [ORD] 324 453 SHAKOPEE [ 626] [DOLOMITE ][OPDC][PRAIRIE DU CHIEN GROUP ] [ORD] 453 545 JORDAN [ 497] [SANDSTONE ][CJDN][JORDAN ] [CAM] 545 547 SHALE 1 4051 [SHALE, DOLOMITE ][CSTL][ST.LAWRENCE ] [CAM] MINNESOTA COUNTY WELL INDEX /WELL LOG. E UN.NO. /CO. : 206588/27 NAME EDINA 19, CITY OF DRILLER S /GEOLOGIC LOG DEPTH ------------------------------------------------------- WELL CONSTRUCTION. DRILLNG METHOD: CABLE TOOL FLUID CASNG MATERIAL: STEEL [EL.TOP ] --- - - - - -- JOINTNG: TOP: FT. ][CODE][STRATIGRAPHIC UNITS) - - - - -- ] [AGE] - - - -- [GROUT----------- - - - - -] 16 DIAM(IN) -- - - - - -- FROM(FT) -- - - - - -- TO(FT) MATERIAL AMNT UNITS - CASING 1 16.0 0 -- - - - -- ---- - - - - -- - - -- - - - -- 0 ][QTUU][TILL CASING 2 16 124 563 28 CASING 3 10 563 1010 SCREEN. 914] [GRAVEL, COBBLE ][QFUU][SAND PRESENT ?: NO [QUA] 28 63 PUMP DATA UNAVAILABLE. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- PUMPAGE TEST(S). [ 902] [CLAY, SAND STATIC WATER LEVEL: 215 FT. DATE: 1957/10/ ° LEVEL(FT) ---------- HOURS ----- - GPM DRAWDOWN(FT) - -- ------ - - - - -- TEST 1: 288 [ 754 73.0 [CLAY TEST 2: 305 --------------------------------------------------------------------- ] 891 90.0 - - - - -- DRILLER S /GEOLOGIC LOG DEPTH INTERVAL DRILLER S DESCRIPTION COLOR HARDNESS [EL.TOP ] --- - - - - -- [INTERPRETED LITHOLOGY ----------------------------------------------------- ][CODE][STRATIGRAPHIC UNITS) - - - - -- ] [AGE] - - - -- 16 CLAY & STONES [ ] [CLAY, COBBLE ][QTUU][TILL ] [QUA] 16 28 GRAVEL & ROCKS [ 914] [GRAVEL, COBBLE ][QFUU][SAND ] [QUA] 28 63 SANDY CLAY [ 902] [CLAY, SAND ][QTUU][TILL ] [QUA] 63 83 CLAY BROWN [ 867] [CLAY ][QTUB][TILL,BROWN ] [QUA] 83 98 SANDY CLAY GRAY [ 847] [CLAY, SAND ][QTUG][TILL,GRAY ] [QUA] 98 119'CLAY, GRAVEL & ROCKS [ 832] [CLAY, GRAVEL, COBBLE ][QUUU][PLEISTOCENE DEPOSIT ] [QUA] 119 129 LIMEROCK [ 8111 [LIMESTONE ][OPVI4][PLATTEVILLE ] (ORD] 129 133 SOAPSTONE [ 801] [SHALE ][OGWD][GLENWOOD ] [ORD] 133 297 ST. PETER SANDROCK [ 797] [SANDSTONE ][OSTP][ST.PETER ] [ORD] 297 431 SHAKOPEE-LIMEROCK [ 633] [DOLOMITE ][OPDC][PRAIRIE DU CHIEN GROUP ] [ORD] 431 513 JORDAN SANDROCK i [ 9 499] [SANDSTONE ][CJDN][JORDAN ] [CAM] MINNESOTA COUNTY WELL INDEX. UN.NO. /CO. : 207674/27 NAME : EDINA 15 ENTERED: 1991/08/24 UPDATED: 1995/10/11 COUNTY : HENNEPIN USE MUNICIPAL DRILLED: 1967/11/06 T/R /SEC. : 117 /21 /29DBBDBA DEPTH 405 FT. DEPTH D: 405 FT. ELEVATION: 897 FT.(TOPO ) CASED 276 FT. GROUT : DIAM. : 20 IN. DRL /DS 27010 :LAYNE WELL CO. LOC.METH.: INFO.OWNER LOC.BY MGS COORDS.: STATUS : ACTIVE WHPA DNR PAO: 73 -111 DPTH BDRK: 191 FT. BEDROCK: PLATTEVILLE OPEN HOLE: PRAIRIE DU CHIEN GROUP - JORDAN AQUIFER : MULTIPLE ADDRESS : INT.RD + MIRROR LK. LM. , EDINA , MN QUAD(7.5): MINNEAPOLIS SOUTH CONTACT: CWI /WL: YES CWI /WC: NO CORE /CTTNGS /GP.: CUTTINGS DATE NITRATE BACTERIA SOURCE SWL ELEV SOURCE ---- - - - - -- - - - - - -- -- - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - -- - - -- - - - - - -- 1967/11/ 69 828 27010 COMMENTS: M.G.S. NO.434 ************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** MINNESOTA COUNTY WELL INDEX. UN.NO. /CO. : 208399 /27 ENTERED: 1991/08/24 NAME : EDINA 2 UPDATED: 1992/08/11 COUNTY : HENNEPIN USE MUNICIPAL DRILLED: 1938/ / T/R /SEC. : 28 /24 /18CAABDD DEPTH 448 FT. DEPTH D: 448 FT. ELEVATION: 878 FT.(TOPO ) CASED 260 FT. GROUT DIAN. : 16 IN. DRL /DS LOC.METH.: INFO.OWNER LOC.BY MGS COORDS.: STATUS ACTIVE WHPA DNR PA,I: 73 -111 i DPTH BDRK: 63 FT. BEDROCK: PLATTEVILLE OPEN HOLE: PRAIRIE DU CHIEN GROUP - JORDAN AQUIFER : MULTIPLE ADDRESS : 4521 50TH ST. , EDINA , MN QUAD(7.5): MINNEAPOLIS SOUTH CONTACT: CWI /WL: YES CWI /WC: NO CORE /CTTNGS /GP.: GEOPHYSICAL LOG DATE NITRATE BACTERIA SOURCE SWL ELEV SOURCE 1973/03/01 <1. MUNI COMMENTS: LOCATED 20FT. S. OF NO. 1 GAMMA LOGGED, 2 -15 -84 ************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** MINNESOTA COUNTY WELL INDEX. UN.NO. /CO. : 240630 /27 ENTERED: 1992/06/29 NAME : EDINA 13, CITY OF UPDATED: 1994/03/30 COUNTY : HENNEPIN USE MONITOR DRILLED: 1946/ / T/R /SEC. : 28 /24 /18DDACBD DEPTH 421 FT. DEPTH D: 496 FT. " ELEVATION: 877 FT.( ) CASED 265 FT. GROUT DIAN. : 12 IN. DRL /DS MDH STATUS : ACTIVE WHPA DNR PA #: QUAD(7.5): MINNEAPOLIS SOUTH CONTACT: CWI /WL: NO CWI /WC: NO CORE /CTTNGS /GP.: DATE ---- - - - - -- NITRATE BACTERIA SOURCE - - - - - -- -- - - - - -- - - - - - SWL ELEV SOURCE 1946/ / i -- - - - -- - - -- 72 805 - - - - - -- MDH 4 COMMENTS: DRILLED BY LAYNE? ******************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** MINNESOTA COUNTY WELL INDEX /WELL LOG. UN.NO. /CO. : 505626/27 NAME EDINA 19 GEO.INTRP: MGS GEOLGST: BB ' WELL CONSTRUCTION. DRILLER S NAME: LEDBETER, B. DRV.SH.: DRILLNG METHOD: CABLE TOOL FLUID : CASNG MATERIAL: STEEL JOINTNG: DIAM(IN) FROM(FT) CASING 1 30 0 CASING 2 24 0 ! CASING 3 18 0 GROUT 1 0 GROUT 2 0 BASEMENT OFFSET ?: >/ =12" METHOD : GEO.STUDY <1:100K --------------------- - - - - -- YES WELDED TOP: 2 FT. [GROUT----------- - - - - -] TO(FT) MATERIAL AMNT. UNITS -- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- - - -- - - - -- 30 243 440 242 440 ABOVE GRND: NEAT CMNT 6 YARDS NEAT CMNT 63 YARDS YES CASING PROTECT: SCREEN. PRESENT ?: NO OPEN HOLE FROM: 440 FT. TO: 520FT. PUMP : DATA UNAVAILABLE. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- PUMPAGE TEST(S). STATIC WATER LEVEL: 163 FT. DATE: 1989/10/26 LEVEL(FT) HOURS GPM DRAWDOWN(FT) - - - - -- - - - -- - - -- ------ - - - - -- TEST 1: 202 3 1200 39.0 --------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- DRILLER S /GEOLOGIC LOG DEPTH INTERVAL DRILLER S DESCRIPTION COLOR HARDNESS [EL.TOP ] --- - - - - -- [INTERPRETED LITHOLOGY ----------------------------------------------------- ][CODE][STRATIGRAPHIC UNITS) - - - - ] -- [AGE] - - - -- 0 52 CLAY YELLOW [ 9501 [CLAY ][QCUY][CLAY,.YELLOW ] [QUA] 52 70 CLAY BLUISH [ 898] [CLAY ][QCUG][CLAY,GRAY ] [QUA] .70 182 CLAY AND GRAVEL BROWN [ 880] [CLAY, GRAVEL ][QPUB][MIXED- W /PEBS.,BROWN ] [QUA] 182 195 ST. PETER TAN [ 768] [SANDSTONE ][OSTP][ST.PETER ] [ORD] 195 207 ST. PETER WHITE [ 7551 [SANDSTONE ][OSTP.][ST.PETER ] [ORD] 207 228 ST. PETER TAN [ 7431 [SANDSTONE ][OSTP][ST.PETER ] (ORD] 228 240 SHALE AND ST. PETER LT. BLUE [ 7221 [SHALE, SANDSTONE ][OSTP][ST.PETER ] [ORD] 240 260 ST. PETER TAN [ 7101 [SANDSTONE ][OSTP][ST.PETER ] (ORD] 260 302 ST. PETER AND SHALE BLUISH 1 690] [SANDSTONE, SHALE ][OSTP][ST.PETER ] [ORD] 1 s t Appendix D [] 1 D Zoning Map I 1 a 0 GR'ANDVIEW DETAIL R, PRO. PC- L 4 y". . L r PC•4 CAHILL RD. Ju P D PC-2 of PIP V PC-41 Poo - 3 islet HPD RCS a PIQ Lim R-I PC -4,'l .4 PID PID I ? 4 010 PRD-3 POD-I T 60 L 4 y". . L CAHILL RD. ®W. 76TH. DETAIL R-i Poo - 3 HPD R-I PC- I p co- 3 PID PRD-3 1W, WIL&OW NO. — EDEN AVf . DETAIL !j POO W.44 TH. ST, 6 FRANCE DETAIL Z01 IING MAP CITY OF EDINA HENNEPIN COUNTY MINNESOTA TA fat =aa fat 50 TH & FRANCE DETAIL A® 1. I f 54 H. & FRANCE DETAIL PC -I IlF 4 ra RD -3 I 41 CAI" lj i i Appendix E 1999 Edina Water Quality Report :i t t 1 1 1 1 I 0 k a a ql t� Ffi N P 4 I r The it of 8-d-ina.,!at System Welcome to Edind's first annual water`' gaalit�, report! The ,city of Edina is i ss g the res Its of ' , � o � _toting performed on-, ts inking water the 1998' calendar year. The Unified States. Con, gress, has directed" a U, ted States Enviro n entail Protection Agency. (USEVK), to require_publie water s,�sterns to report annually on the quality of the ,drinking water prodded. 'Z'he Edtina `titer Utility welcomes this opportunity to. co � , � uwicabe with and imform you, the customer, about the water prod'uGt you purchase and use' on a daily, basis. Not only are you a ,customer, you are also a stakeholder' in a multi -mil on do lar water A . system that delivers an uninterrupted flow ,of water to your faucet every. , day. In addition to advancing our customers' understanding of their drinking water, we hope the report will heighten awareness of the need to protect and preserve SWI precious`water resources. Water Utility Facts Supply Sources. The residents of Edina are fortunate to have drinking water supply sources that are safe and aesthetically pleasing. The supply originates from ground and surface water sources: 18 wells, ranging in depth from 380 to 1130 feet, that draw water from the Mt Simon, Prairie Du Chien - Jordan, and Jordan aquifers. d The City of Minneapolis, which supplies treated surface water from the Mississippi River to the Morningside neighborhood of Edina. History Prior to the 1930's, residents of the com- munity received their water from private wells. During the construction of the Sunny Slope neighborhood, the developer drilled a well to supply water to residents as they moved in. After construction of the neighborhood was complete, the developer donated the well to the community. The system has grown to include seven million gallons of storage capacity (one -4 million gallon underground storage tank, two -1 million gallon towers, and two- 500,000 gallon towers), 1800 hydrants, and 220 miles of water main. Consumption averages 7.5 million gallons per day. Did You Know? e►1.2 billion people do not have a safe supply of drinking, water. h- One inch of rain,on a one acre lot totals approximately'27,000 gallons of water �► Keeping a 1/4 ,acre lawn green can require 3000 gallons of water,per week. 1w The amount of water used in'Edina jn one year would .fill a swimming ;pool 6' deep, 1!00' wide, and 116,miles,longl ke It taken 39,000 gallons of water to :manufacture an automobile. b Depending on brand ,and packaging, it -would cost between $40 and $200 to take a bath in bottled water. In Edina water, it costs less than $0.10. Water Treatment kg Iron Removal. Iron is found in abundant C + quantities in groundwater throughout Minnesota, and Edina's wells are no exception. While not a threat to health, ' 9 iron affects the aesthetic qualities of the water. It leaves rust - colored stains and can also make the water appear cloudy or' orange- colored at times. Remedying the problems associated with iron is one of our top priorities. In 1999 we have adopted a three - tiered approach to minimize the amount of iron reaching your tap: - Operation of treatment plants on iron -rich wells. The iron in the water is oxidized to an insoluble form and i filtered out of the water. We maintain an aggressive schedule of plant refurbishing so that each plant will be operating at optimum efficiency. — Addition of polyphosphate to the water. -- This additive prevents iron from precipitating on laundry, fixtures, and porcelain. This treatment process begarJ in February and initial reports indicate that it has been very successful. — Watermain flushing. The water utility flushes all mains on a regular basis to r� prevent iron build up in the pipes. This reduces the amount of iron that reache! your faucets. 1 Iditional Edina Water Information <,..iservation ,'n Minnesota, where excellent water sources are abundant, uninterrupted flow to homes . businesses is taken for granted by most people. It is important to remember, etheless, that water is a valuable and crucial resource for human health, recreation, :.na the economy. Because demand for water is particularly high in the summer months, th0 City of Edina observes an odd/even sprinkling schedule from May 1 to September 1 h year. This enables the water utility to efficiently manage the water supply and tects the vital water resources that the city is fortunate to have. iVater Hardness e minerals calcium and magnesium cause water to be "hard." These minerals are found ;round water throughout Minnesota, and Edina's water supply wells are typical of the ion. If you are bothered by hardness problems, Edina's water hardness is at a level !hat responds well to a home - softening device. It is important to remember that water teners require regular maintenance, regeneration, and the purchase of salt. Softening ter does increase the sodium level of your water; also, some people do not like the — isation of bathing in soft water. ld is a contaminant that can be leached m plumbing, especially in older homes. I'he lead levels in the Edina water system in compliance with federal and state ndards. It is possible, however, that A levels in your home could be higher than those at other residences in the nmunity due to materials used in your ne's plumbing. If you are concerned .. ,)ut lead (young children typically are :pore vulnerable to lead in drinking water in the general population) you may wish have your water tested. Flushing your 'ap until the water runs at its coldest prior to use for drinking or cooking has proven ective in significantly decreasing lead els. Additional information is available from the Safe Drinking Water Hotline at 6110- 426 -4791. - ..sinfection. To guarantee that the water supply is free of disease - causing micro - ganisms, the water is disinfected using lorine. Regular monitoring for bacteria onsistently confirms that Edina's water ;Q safe. uoridation. Addition of fluoride is andated by state law. Fluoride has been � roven to reduce tooth decay, especially in -' ildren. Fluoridation of public water pplies has prevented countless millions cavities and saved society millions of .lollars in dental care costs. The concentra- )n of fluoride in Edina's water is onitored regularly so that optimum „vets are maintained. Monitoring Report Summary For the calendar year of 1998, no contami- nants were detected at levels that exceeded federal standards. The table lists the substances that were detected in trace amounts that were below legal limits. According to the EPA, drinking water, including bottled water, may reasonably be expected to contain at least small amounts of some contaminants. Their presence does not necessarily indicate that water poses a health risk. More information about con- taminants and potential health effects can be obtained by calling the Environmental Protection Agency's Safe Drinking Water Hotline at (800) 426 -4791. Your drinking water is monitored for over a hundred regulated and unregulated substances. Regulated or primary standards have had Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) established by the Safe Drinking Water Act legislation. Unregulated or secondary contaminants do not have established MCLs. They are assessed using state standards known as Health Risk Limits, or have recommended maximums set by the Safe Drinking Water Act. If unacceptable levels of an unregulated contaminant are found, the response is the same as if an MCL has been exceeded. If state or federal standards for regulated or unregulated substances are ever exceeded in your water supply, the Edina Water Utility will immediately inform its customers so that corrective action can be taken by either the customer or the water utility. The sources of drinking water (both tap water and bottled water) Include rivers, lakes, streams, ponds, reservoirs, springs, and wells. As water travels over the surface of the land or through the ground, it dissolves naturally oc- curring material, and can pick up substances resulting from the presence of animals or hu- man activity. Edina water is regularly moni- tored for hundreds of substances so we all can be confident of Its quality. The water Is regu- larly evaluated for the following contaminant groups: - Microbials, such as viruses and bacteria, which may come from sewage treatment plants, septic systems, agricultural livestock operations, and wildlife. - Inorganics, such as salts and metals, which can be naturally occurring or result from ur- ban storm runoff, Industrial or domestic wastewater discharges, or farming. Pesticides and herbicides, which may come from a variety of sources such as agricul- ture, urban storm water runoff, and residential uses. r• Organic chemicals, including synthetic and volatile organic chemicals, which are by- products of Industrial processes, and can come from gas stations, urban storm water runoff, and septic systems. �• Radioactive constituents, which can be nat- urally occurring. In order to ensure that tap water is safe to drink, EPA prescribes regulations that limit the amount of certain substances In water provid- ed by public water systems. Food and Drug Administration regulations establish limits for contaminants In bottled water which must pro- vide the same protection for public health. Special Information from the EPA Some people may be more vulnerable to con- taminants found in drinking water than the general population. immuno- compromised persons such as persons with cancer under- going chemotherapy, persons who have un- dergone organ transplants, people with HIV /AIDS or other Immune system disorders, some elderly, and Infants can be particularly at risk from Infections. These people should seek advice about drinking water from their health care providers. Environmental Protection Agency /Centers for Disease Control guide- lines on appropriate means to lessen the risk of infection by Cryptosporidlum are available from the Safe Drinking Water Hot -Line (800- 426. 4791). Summary The staff at the Edina Water Utility strives to provide safe, aesthetically pleasing drinking water as well as high quality service to you, the customers and stakeholders. In pursuit of these goals, we consistently meet and exceed federal and state standards for safe water. The human and capital investments the community has made in our system have been invaluable and success would be impossible without your help. If you have questions or need more information. contact the Edina Water Utility at 826 -0311. Substances D Detected i in the E Edina Water Supply Regulated Substances Controlled Prior to Distribution (if not tested in 1998, l last test date included) Substance (units) A Highest Level Highest Level M Meets I Range G Ideal (MCL) E Edina Water R Requirements' Detected ( (MCLG) Typical Sources of Substance Flouride (ppm) 3/27/96 4 4.0 1 1.3 ✓ ✓ - - - 4 4.0 Barium (ppm) A 2.0 0 0.15 ✓ ✓ I I ND - 0.15 2 2.0 N Additive Nitrate as Nitrogen (ppm) 1 10.0 0 0.34 ✓ ✓ r ND- 0:34 - refineries 1,1,1- Trichloroethane (ppb) 2 200.0 N 0 C ✓ N - -- F Fertilizer, sewage, wildlife C Benzene (ppb) 5 5.0 0 .2 ✓ ✓ N ND - 0.2 2 200.0 M Metal degreasing, factories Cis -1,2- Dichloroethene (ppb) 7 70.0 4 4.1 ✓ ND - 0.- 2 P Petroleum, factories, landfills Trans -1,2- Dichloroethene (ppb) 1 100,0 0 0.2 ✓ ✓ N ND - 4. 7 70.0 I Industrial chemical factories Trichloroethene (ppb) 5 5.0 1 1.3 0 chemical fectorle Vinyl Chloride (ppb) 2 2 0 0 0.5 ✓ 0/ N ND - 1.3 "' s Degreasing sites, factories Alpha Emitters (ppb) 1 15.0 .0 N b,4 ✓ ✓ " ND - 0.5 - - -- P Plastics factories, PVC pipe Combined Radium (pCVL) 5 5.0 4 4.0 ✓ ✓ 2 2.0-5.4 N Natural deposits Mercury, inorganic (ppb) 2 2.0 " 0.02 ✓ ✓ N 3.3-4.0 " "" N Natural deposits Natural deposits, landfills, refineries, factories, cropland runoff Unregulated Substances Detected in Edina W Water (if not tested in 1 1998, last test date included) Sodium (ppm) 9/94 - -- 1 130.0 ✓ ✓ N ND - 1'30:0 2 200 Natural deposits 1,1 - Dichloroethene (ppb) _ v__ 5 5.7 ✓ ✓ N 0.2 - 5.7 6 60 D Disinfection by- product Br . --- 4 4.1 r ✓ 0 ND - 0.9 7 70 I Industrial discharge Dibromochloromethane (ppb) - - -- 4 4.0 ✓ r/ N ND - 4.1 6 6.0 D Disinfection by- product Bromoform (ppb) _ ___ 1 1.4 D ✓ N ND - 4.0 1 10 Disinfection by- product Sulfate (ppm) 8/10/94 . .._ 9 9 1 ✓ ✓ N ND 2 250 D Disinfection by- product Natural deposits Regulated Substances Controlled in the Distribution System Action Level Substance (units) s (AL) 904 of f ff of sites M Meets 9 90% of all I Ideal be lass than A , s were below ( (MCLG) T T Lead (ppb) 1 this level t 2 out of 30 ✓ ✓ e this level e Copper (rpm) 1 1 3 0 0 out o KEY: MCLG: Maximum Co - d 0.6 - -- Home plumbing, wood preservative ntaminant Level Goal (the level of contaminant in drinking water below which there is no known or expected risk to health. MCLGs allow for a margin of safety). MCL: Maximum Contaminant Level (the highest level of the contaminant that Is allowed in drinking water. MCLs are set as close to MCLGs as feasible using the best available treatment technology). AL: Action Level (the concentration of a contaminant which, if exceeded, triggers treatment or other requirement which a water system must follow). PPB: parts per billion (equivalent to 1 tsp/1,300,000 gallons). PPM: parts per million (equivalent to 1 tap /1,300 gallons). ND: Not Detected. pCl/L: Pico curies per liter (a measure of radioactivity). ; 111 L, City of Edina 0 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 -1394 ECRWSS Residential Customer Local PRESORTED STANDARD U.S. POSTAGE PAID EDINA, MN 55424 PERMIT NO. 251 ECRWSS Residential Customer Local PRESORTED STANDARD U.S. POSTAGE PAID EDINA, MN 55424 PERMIT NO. 251 Appendix F PCS Data POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT SOURCES CITY AGENCY ID# DWSMA VIC SITES 7625 BUILDING 7625 PARKLAWN AVE EDINA VP2890 11 HCMF 320 WASHINGTON AVE HOPKINS VP9941 13 PRECIOUS METAL PLATERS 139/149 NORTH JACKSON AVE HOPKINS VP8700 13 LUST SITES EDINA CITY HALL 4801 W 50TH ST EDINA 555 2 EDINA COUNTRY CLUB 5100 WOODDALE AVE EDINA 6309 2 EDINA COUNTRY CLUB 5100 WOODDALE AVE EDINA 5963 2 EDINA COUNTRY CLUB 5100 WOODDALE AVE EDINA 4048 2 PAULUS RESIDENCE 4617 MOORLAND AVENUE EDINA 3253 2 TEYNOR RESIDENCE 4618 MOORLAND AVE EDINA 9881 2 BETSY VON KUSTER PROPERTY 4500 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA 7984 2 BETSY VON KUSTER PROPERTY 4500 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA 5416 2 JACK RITCHIE PROPERTY 4627 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA 6275 2 TORREN RESIDENCE 4508 CASCO AVE EDINA 7395 2 UTTER RESIDENCE 4400 SUNNYSIDE RD EDINA 7496 2 DONNA DAVIDSON RESIDENCE 4612 WOODDALE AVE EDINA 7524 2 JENNINGS RESIDENCE 4404 W 50TH ST EDINA 8452 2 ARMBRUST RESIDENCE 4516 MOORLAND AVE EDINA 8416 2 GROSSMAN RESIDENCE 4614 MOORLAND AVE EDINA 8344 2 BURNETT RESIDENCE 4514 WOODDALE AVENUE EDINA 8483 2 VACANT RESIDENCE 4513 BROWNSDALE AVE EDINA 9092 2 HODNET RESIDENCE 4824 SUNNYSLOPE RD EDINA 9449 2 BOSSMAN RESIDENCE 4609 MOORLAND AVE EDINA 9392 2 GREGORY RESIDENCE 4605 MOORLAND AVE EDINA 10039 2 FLECK RESIDENCE 4611 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA 9707 2 HEDIN RESIDENCE 4605 CASCO AVE EDINA 9806 2 PRIVATE PARTY 4408 SUNNYSIDE EDINA 9252 2 REFSELL RESIDENCE 4626 BRUCE EDINA 9819 2 SLEE RESIDENCE 4510 CASCO AVE EDINA 9445 2 STALEY PROPERTY 4517 EDINA BLVD EDINA 9306 2 WEISS RESIDENCE 4515 MOORLAND AVE EDINA 9382 2 VENNUM RESIDENCE 4209 COUNTRY CLUB RD EDINA 9927 2 EISELE RESIDENCE 4527 DREXEL AVE EDINA 10956 2 ROUNER RESIDENCE 4526 DREXEL AVE EDINA 11161 2 EDINA HIGHLAND VILLA 5250 VILLA WAY EDINA 8786 7 SUPERAMERICA #4047 5205 VERNON AVE EDINA 2416 7 KUNZ OIL 5200 EDEN CIR EDINA 9491 7 PARKS DEVELOPMENT 5229 EDEN AVE EDINA 9532 7 EDINA REALITY 5277 LOCHLOY DR EDINA 11383 7 ROBERTS AUTOMATIC PRODUCTS 4451 W 76TH ST EDINA 617 11 HEATHERTON CONDIMINUIMS 4120 PARK LAWN AVE EDINA 11029 11 HOPKINS CAR CARE CENTER LTD 404 MAIN ST HOPKINS 7700 13 SPUR STATION #3120 602 E EXCELSIOR BLVD HOPKINS 3311 13 SUPER VALLI 101 JEFFERSON AVE S HOPKINS 1124 13 U -HAUL CENTER 502 EXCELSIOR BLVD HOPKINS 6131 13 HENNEPIN COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS 320 WASHINGTON AVE S HOPKINS 6821 13 HENNEPIN COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS FA 320 WASHINGTON AVE S HOPKINS 11591 13 HENNEPIN COUNTY MAINTENANCE FAC 320 WASHINGTON AVE S HOPKINS 5521 13 RED OWL 215 E EXCELSIOR BLVD HOPKINS 574 13 SUPER VALU 215 E EXCELSIOR AVE HOPKINS 9739 13 SOUTHDALE LIBRARY 7001 YORK AVE S EDINA 5449 18 EDINA COMMUNITY CENTER 5701 NORMANDALE RD EDINA 7629 486 SOUTHVIEW JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 4725 SOUTHVIEW LN EDINA 5793 486 SOUTHVIEW JUNIOR HIGH 4725 SOUTHVIEW LANE EDINA 6515 486 JOANN AND DAVID NORTHRUP 4702 LAKEVIEW DRIVE EDINA 3162 486 POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT SOURCES TYPE NAME ADDRESS CITY AGENCY ID# DWSMA DATE MATERIAL SPILLED SPILL SITES CHEMLAWN 4511 CASCO AVENUE EDINA 2 7/13/90 AG- RELATED PRODUCTS NORTHERN STATES POWER 4605 BROWNDALE EDINA 2 7/18/97 MINERAL OIL(ELECTRIC EQUI CITY OF EDINA 5100 FRANCE AVE SO. EDINA 3 7/24/97 MISCELLANEOUS MATERIALS OVERNITE TRANSPORTATION 5250 VILLA WAY EDINA 7 9/10/96 BA SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY 7801 COMPUTER AVE S. BLOOMINGTON 11 11/16198 ANTIFREEZE SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY 7801 COMPUTER AVE S. BLOOMINGTON 11 11/16198 ANTIFREEZE UNKNOWN 7801 COMPUTER AVENUE SOUT BLOOMINGTON 11 10/13194 MISCELLANEOUS CHEMICALS SEGATE TECHNOLOGY 7801 COMPUTER AVENUE SOUT BLOOMINGTON 11 12/27/94 WATE WATER SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY 7801 COMPUTER AVE S BLOOMINGTON 11 9/11/95 WATE WATER SEAGATE TECH. 7801 COMPUTER AVE S. BLOOMINGTON 11 5/28/97 HYDRAULIC FLUID CH TECHNOLOGY 7801 COMPUTER ST. BLOOMINGTON 11 1/8/99 ANTIFREEZE CITY OF HOPKINS 320 WASHINGTON AVENUE HOPKINS 13 4/27/93 PETROLEUM PRODUCTS(OTHER HENNEPIN CTY DEPT OF PUBL 320 WASHINGTON S HOPKINS 13 10/4/95 DIESEL HENNEPIN CO. PUBLIC SERVI 220 WASHINGTON AVE SO. HOPKINS 13 417/98 DIESEL CHEMLAWN 7300 YORK AVENUE SOUTH EDINA 18 6/17/91 AG- RELATED PRODUCTS OVERNITE TRANSPORT 3535 WEST 70TH STREET EDINA 18 5/9/95 DIESEL BFI 7201 YORK AVE S EDINA 18 2118/97 HYDRAULIC FLUID NSP 3460 70TH ST W. EDINA 18 6/15/98 MINERAL OIL(ELECTRIC EQUI NSP 3460 70TH ST W. EDINA 18 6/15/98 MINERAL OIL(ELECTRIC EQUI NSP 3460 70TH ST W. EDINA 18 6115/98 MINERAL OIL(ELECTRIC EQUI NSP 3460 70TH ST W. EDINA 18 6115/98 MINERAL OIL(ELECTRIC EQUI FOUNTAIN WOODS 6730 VERNON AVE EDINA 16 7/17/96 HYDRAULIC FLUID HAZARDOUS WASTE VIOLATORS SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY INC 7801 COMPUTER AVE BLOOMINGTON MND000293076 11 11- Aug -87 APS INC 4175 W 76TH ST EDINA MND048168462 11 5- Mar -87 HENNEPIN COUNTY PUBLIC SVC 320 WASHINGTON AVE S HOPKINS MND021582820 13 19- Jan -93 AZTEC INDUSTRIES INC 4450 WEST 78TH ST CIRCLE BLOOMINGTON MND071493084 11 5- Feb-81 F' E . .- 3- POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT SOURCES TYPE NAME ADDRESS CITY AGENCY ID# DWSMA UST SITES EDINA COMMUNITY LIBRARY 4701 W 50TH ST EDINA 2088 2 EDINA COUNTRY CLUB 5100 WOODDALE AVE EDINA 15084 2 KUSTER BETSY & PAUL VON 4500 SUNNYSIDE BOARD EDINA 16340 2 WILLIAM E LOUGH II 4900 ARDEN AVENUE SOUTH EDINA 20212 2 AMERICANA STATE BANK 5050 FRANCE AVE S EDINA 1606 3 SOUTHDALE OFFICE CENTER 6800 FRANCE AVE S EDINA 2280 5 SOUTHDALE OFFICE CENTER 6700.6750 FRANCE AVE S EDINA 2279 5 AMOCO SS #9532 5209 VERNON AVE EDINA 2950 7 EDINA HIGHLAND VILLA 5250 VILLA WAY EDINA 2203 7 SUPERAMERICA #4047 5205 VERNON AVE EDINA 1532 7 INTERLACHEN COURT 5300 VERNON AVE S EDINA 18552 7 KUNZ OIL CO 5200 EDEN CIRCLE EDINA 19743 7 PENTAGON OFFICE PARK 4510 W 77TH ST EDINA 3215 11 PENTAGON OFFICE PARK 7600 PARKLAWN AVE EDINA 3214 11 PENTAGON OFFICE PARK 4530 W 77TH ST EDINA 3216 11 MAGNETIC PERIPHERALS INC 7801 COMPUTER AVE S BLOOMINGTON 1924 11 PARKLAWN EAST & WEST CONDOMINIU 4351 -4401 PARKLAWN AVE EDINA 15393 11 HEATHERTON OF EDINA 4120 PARKLAWN AVE EDINA 2516 11 PARK LAWN ESTATES 4141 PARKLAWN AVE EDINA 15440 11 PARK LAWN APARTMENTS 4120 PARK LAWN AVE EDINA 20292 11 WALSER CHRYSLER PLYMOUTH 314 MAIN ST HOPKINS 2271 13 HOPKINS CAR CARE CENTER LTD 404 MAIN ST HOPKINS 2444 13 JET #23017 525 EXCELSIOR AVE SW HOPKINS 1748 13 SINCLAIR RETAIL #89404 501 EXCELSIOR BLVD HOPKINS 1466 13 SPUR STATION #3120 602 E EXCELSIOR BLVD HOPKINS 1763 13 U -HAUL CENTER 502 EXCELSIOR BLVD HOPKINS 2985 13 HARLEY HOPKINS COMMUNITY CENTER 125 MONTOE AVE S HOPKINS 3096 13 SUPER VALLI 215 E EXCELSIOR AVE HOPKINS 1669 13 PRECIOUS METAL PLATERS INC 149 JACKSON AVE N HOPKINS 2413 13 EDCO PRODUCTS INC 802 ST LEWIS ST HOPKINS 14374 13 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE 6364 JOHN HARRIS DR EDINA 2044 14 GALLERIA 3510 W 70TH EDINA 14087 18 YORK CONDO WEST ASSN 7220 YORK AVE S EDINA 11850 18 YORK CONDOMINIUM ASSN 7200 YORK AVE S EDINA 11849 18 YORKTOWN CONTINENTAL APARTMENTS 7151 YORK AVE S EDINA 2578 18 EDINA HIGH SCHOOL 6754 VALLEY VIEW RD EDINA 2465 19 VALLEY VIEW JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 6750 VALLEY VIEW RD EDINA 2466 19 COMMUNITY CENTER EDINA 5701 NORMANDALE RD EDINA 2462 4 &6 CONCORD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 5900 CONCORD AVE S EDINA 2464 4 &6 SOUTHVIEW JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 4725 SOUTHVIEW LN EDINA 2463 4&6 FOUNTAIN WOODS II - CONDOMINIUM 6670 VERNON AVE EDINA 11851 16 FOUNTAIN WOODS CONDOMINIUM ASSN 6650 VERNON AVE EDINA 11908 16 FOUNTAIN WOODS CONDOMINIUMS 6650 VERNON AVE S EDINA 2369 16 FOUNTAIN WOODS CONDOMINIUM ASSN 6710 VERNON AVE EDINA 11909 16 FOUNTAIN WOODS CONDOMINIUMS 6710 VERNON AVE S EDINA 2371 16 FOUNTAIN WOODS II - CONDOMINIUM 6730 VERNON AVE EDINA 11852 16 FOUNTAIN WOODS CONDOMINIUMS 6730 VERNON AVE S EDINA 2370 16 AST SITES ROBERTS AUTOMATIC PRODUCTS INC 4451 W 76TH ST EDINA 2599 11 THEXTON MANUFACTURING 7685 PARKLAWN AVE EDINA 55620 11 HARRY LINDBERY COMPANY 6901 MALONEY AVENUE HOPKINS 55430 13 SUPER VALUE STORES INC 101 JEFFERSON AVE S HOPKINS 2756 13 HENNEPIN COUNTY BPS HEADQUARTER 320 WASHINGTON AVE S HOPKINS 2041 13 POTENTIAL CONTAMINANT SOURCES TYPE NAME ADDRESS CITY AGENCY ID# DWSMA LARGE QUANTITY HAZ WASTE GEN BLACKS PHOTOGRAPHY 803 5010 FRANCE AVE S EDINA 3 SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY 7801 COMPUTER AVE BLOOMINGTON 11 HENNEPIN COUNTY HHW 320 WASHINGTON AVE S HOPKINS 13 SMALL QUANTITY HAZ WASTE GEN EDINA CITY OF 4801 W 50TH ST EDINA MND076493725 2 HC EDINA LIBRARY 4701 W 50TH ST EDINA MNR000029801 2 AMERICANA BANK 5050 FRANCE AVE S EDINA MNR000002519 3 SOUTHDALE OFFICE CENTER 6800 FRANCE AVE S EDINA MND980682140 5 CCR ACQUISITION CORP 6800 FRANCE AVE S STE 180 EDINA MND985694934 5 ELLIS RICHARD INC 6800 FRANCE AVE S STE 755 EDINA MN0000377515 5 LEWIS ENGINEERING CO 5229 EDEN AVE MINNEAPOLIS MND047251343 7 EDINA AMOCO FOOD SHOP 5209 VERNON AVE S EDINA MNR000016071 7 CHEMREX INC 7711 COMPUTER AVE MINNEAPOLIS MND982619736 11 MCGRAW HILL INFORMATION SYSTEMS 7600 PARKLAWN MINNEAPOLIS MND980902712 11 NATIONAL COMPUTER SYSTEMS INC 4401 W 76TH ST EDINA MND043856723 11 NORTHWEST TELEPRODUCTIONS INC 4455 W 77TH ST MINNEAPOLIS MND048157259 11 PPG INDUSTRIES INC LOCATION #18 7725 PARKLAWN AVENUE EDINA MND980616320 11 ROBERTS AUTOMATIC PRODUCTS INC 4451 W 76TH ST MINNEAPOLIS MND006253694 11 THEXTON MFG CO INC 7685 PARKLAWN AVE S EDINA MND006247860 11 SPEEC INC 4444 W 76TH ST EDINA MN0000140574 11 VISTA INFROMATION SOLUTIONS 4510 W 77TH ST STE 100 EDINA MNR000021816 11 APS INC 4175 W 76TH ST EDINA MND048168462 11 HENNEPIN COUNTY PUBLIC SVC 320 WASHINGTON AVE S HOPKINS MND021582820 13 LINDBERY HARRY TRUCKING 6901 MALONEY AVE HOPKINS MND022823801 13 MIDAS MUFFLER 519 E EXCELSIOR HOPKINS MND982209306 13 RUAN LEASING 134 MONROE AVE N HOPKINS MND981533730 13 SUPER VALU STORES INC 101 JEFFERSON AVE S HOPKINS MND119494920 13 WALSER CHRYSLER PLYMOUTH 314 MAIN ST HOPKINS MND022909626 13 ACE LABEL SYSTEMS INC 140 JACKSON AVE N HOPKINS MND039579479 13 MCLARD JACK AND ASSOCIATES 128 JACKSON AVE N HOPKINS MND981784424 13 BRAEMAR GOLF MAINT BLDG 6364 JOHN HARRIS DR EDINA MN0001001502 14 GALLERIA 3510 W 70TH ST EDINA MND982425290 18 LARSEN DESIGN OFFICE INC 7101 YORK AVE S EDINA MND102279528 18 IND SCHOOL DIST 273 EDINA 6750 VALLEY VIEW RD EDINA MND982221566 19 IND SCHOOL DIST 273 EDINA 5701 NORMANDALE RD EDINA MND982209918 4 &6 CONCORD ELEMENTARY 5900 CONCORD AVE EDINA MNR000011163 4 &6 NORMANDALE LUTHERAN CHURCH 6100 NORMANDALE RD EDINA MNR000021873 4 &6 HAZARDOUS WASTE TRANSPORTERS BRAEMAR GOLF MAINT BLDG 6364 JOHN HARRIS DR EDINA MND0001001502 14 NORMANDALE LUTHERAN CHURCH 6100 NORMANDALE RD EDINA MNR000021873 4 &6 f Appendix G WPP Contamination Response Plan I k t i w 1 i r City of Edina, Minnesota Wellhead Protection Plan Contamination Response Plan Date Issued: January 2000 Purpose: To establish standard operating procedures for managing groundwater contamination incidents within the one year time -of- travel areas of the municipal wells, and provide a planned response. s Response Plan: Intended for spills within the one year time -of- travel area of a municipal well. 1. The Edina Fire Department will handle the spill response in accordance to the April 4, 1989 Department Directive for Hazardous Materials Incident Management, and the February 19, 1993 Department Directive for Hazardous y Materials City Policy (see Attachment A). 2. Once the situation is controlled, the City Fire Department shall inform the Engineering Department of the status of the incident. As the spill is remediated, the Engineering Department shall be kept informed. Response Plan: Intended for contaminated groundwater identified at a wellhead of a municipal well or within the one year time -of- travel area of a municipal well. 1. The City will cease pumping from that well, and will rely on the other municipal wells for public water supply. 2. The City will evaluate the feasibility of remediating the groundwater pumped from the impacted well prior to its distribution to the public water supply system. t a+ Attachment A Edina Fire Department Hazardous Materials Department Directives DEC -06 -1999 14:46 EDINA FIRE DEPT. 612 826 166:16 r.eele4 1 EFFECTIVE DATE ' EDINA FIRE DEPARTMENT NUMBER 203.00 APRIL 4, 1989 DEPARTMENT DIRECTIVE DATE ISSUED PAGE 1 OF 2 APRIL 4, 1989 SUBJECT: Hazardous ! materials REVISION SUPERSEDES Incident management Procedure Dir. #86 -6, #86 -2; #84 -3 PURPOSE: To establish standard operating procedures for hazardous materials incidents. PROCEDURE: 1. On arrival, Incident Command shall be established and status reported to Dispatch. 2_ Operation objectives are as follows: secure area apd prevent further loss or injury to life and property. Containment of danger until situation can-be transferred to appropriate authority. 3. Southwest Fire League Hazardous materials Responders should be contacted at any point in time at which one of the following objectives is unable to be completed: A. OBSERVE INCIDENT FROM A SAFE DISTANCE (upwind and uphill) B. INITIAL RESPONSE ACTION 1) Identify Product(s) Involved (placards or markings) 2) Secure Area and Insure personnel Safety 3) Determine Potential Harm Through Reference Manuals, CHEMTREC, Hazard Line, etc. 4) Establish Command Post and Communication System C. ESTABLISH ACTION PLAN 1) Evacuation 2) Containment 3) Rescue 4. Extinguishment D. DETERMINE REQUIRED RESOURCES 1) specialized Equipment 2) Mutual Aid 3) Notify Proper State Agencies 4) Notify Proper Federal Agencies E. INITIATE ACTION PLAN F. NOTVT ®IA - ESTABLISH PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER G. PYA=7Z PROGs"A DEC-06 -1999 14:47 EDINA FIRE DEPT. 612 826 039:5 F -W /U4 1, DEPARTMENT DIRECTIVE NO. 203.00 PAGE 2 OF 2 H. DECONTAMINATE PERSONNEL AND EQUIPMENT a I. NOTIFY CLEAR -UP CONTRACTORS 4. The Southwest Fire League Hazardous Materials Response Manual is attached and made part of this directive, including: A. Southwest Fire League Responder List H. Clears -Up Contractors List S. Requests for a HazHat Responder shall be made to Hopkins Fire Department for a "team ". APPROVED BY: Theodore R. Paulfranz, Fire f DEC -06 -1999 14:47 ED I NA FIRE DEPT. _ _ 612 8_2b_ _ _b_s_y_.s _ _ t.04/04 FEBRUARY 19, 1993 DEPARTMENT DIRECTIVE . DATE ISSVBD: FEB. 19, 1993 PACE 1 OF 1 SUBJECT: HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, REVISION SUPERSEDES CITY POLICY PURPOSE: To formally establish responsibility for hazardous materials response, action and directicri. Refer: Directives No. 203.xx, 214.xx, 212.xx POLICY: I. Edina Fire Department is responsible for all hazardous materials pre - planning, response and mitigation for sites and incidents occurring within the City of Edina. 2. Whenever it comes to the attention of Edina Fire Department that a hazardous material is involved in an incident, the Edina Fire Department shall respond to take appropriate action. incidents may involve any of the following: - -- Suspicious, small containers - -- Leaking containers of unknown product -- Spills of hazardous materials - -- Releases, over- pressure - -- Unusual odor and fumes 3. Response shall be adjusted to meet the needs of the incident. (See Directive 212.xx) Response may be routine or emergency, and should include a hasmat specialist, technician or inspector. See attached list. 4. on arrival, Edina Fire Department representative shall establish command as per Directive 214.xx, "Incident Command", and follow S.O.P. Directive 203.xx, "Hazardous Materials Incident Management ". S. The Fire Department may clean up and dispose of small, manageable spills or containers. Normally cleanup will be undertaken by a private contractor, using methods and procedures approved by the Incident Commander and the State Pollution Control Agency. A. First choice will be the State specified contract. B. Second choice -- O. E. Materials of Hopkins. 6. Orphan drums, and other containers of unknown contents or source, shall be reported to State Duty Officer, Pollution Control Agency, and handled as per their direction. This may include short -term storage by the Edina Fire Department at a site pre - approved. 7. Edina Fire Department shall not solicit the collection of household hazardous waste. If and when such material comes into our possession and under our control, containers shall be transferred to temporary storage at the recycling center. When pre- desermined temporary storage levels are reached, Edina Fire Department will assist Public Works in transferring household hazardous waste correctly and safely to the Hennepin County Transfer Station. APPROVED B7Thec re R. Paulfranz?,11re Chief Specialist Technician Inspector Robinson Lutts Landry M. Scheerer Radjenovich Myre Nelson Bagley Lisk Paulfranz Medzis Rothe TOTAL P.04