Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1997-04-21_COUNCIL PACKETU v � .SO o• • ,"cOAPOSV`"�6 City of Edina RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR THE OLDE VERNON ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled, "OLDE VERNON, platted by the Philip Stephen Companies, a Minnesota corporation and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council on April 21, 1997, be and is hereby granted final plat approval. Passed and adopted by the Edina City Council this 211 of April, 1997. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY.OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing City Council Minutes is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its special meeting of November 6, 1996 and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this 21St day of April, 1997 Debra A. Mangen, i Clerk City Hall (612) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 927 -7645 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 927 -5461 �1 Nr� �0 City of Ediiaa RESOLUTION REGARDNG SPEED STUDY WEST 78T" STREET - FROM EAST BUSH LAKE ROAD TO TWO HUNDRED FEET WEST OF GLEASON ROAD WHEREAS, West 78`h Street between East Bush Lake Road and two hundred feet west of Gleason Road is a busy thoroughfare; and WHEREAS, a significant number of accidents have occurred along this stretch of roadway; and WHEREAS, the roadway geometrics tend to be curvilinear and have grades resulting in excessive speeds of motorists. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council requests that the Minnesota Department of Transportation undertake a speed study to determine if a lower speed limit can be established on said route. Passed and adopted by the Edina City Council this 21st day of April, 1997 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing City Council Minutes is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its special meeting of November 6, 1996 and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this 21" day of April, 1997 . -. �' City Hall (612) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 927 -7645 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 927 -5461 �0 o• • 'N�APoMT¢ City of Edina RESOLUTION REQUESTING MN /DOT RECONSTRUCT EAST BUSH LAKE ROAD BRIDGE OVER INTERSTATE 494 WHEREAS, the Edina City Council commissioned a traffic study from the SRF Consulting Group, Inc. to review existing traffic conditions along the West 78th Street Corridor and to develop recommendation for roadway and traffic control improvements to the existing conditions; and WHEREAS, said study identified a need for improvements to the East Bush Lake Road Bridge over Interstate 494. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council hereby requests the Minnesota Department of Transportation place the highest priority available on the bridge widening of East Bush Lake Road over Interstate 494. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Edina City Council hereby requests the Minnesota Department of Transportation complete the reconstruction of the East Bush Lake Road Bridge over Interstate 494 to coincide with the addition of a third lane to Interstate 494 or sooner. Member Hovland seconded the motion.. Passed and adopted by the Edina City Council, this 21st day of April, 1997. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing City Council Minutes is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its special meeting of November 6, 1996 and as recorded in the Minutes.of said.regular meeting. WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this 211 day of April, 1997 Debra A. Man eri, Cd Clerk City Hall (612) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 927 -7645 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 927 -5461 �1 o� e C • '��bHroM��O City of Edina RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Edina, enter into an agreement with the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation for the following purposes, to wit: To revise the existing traffic control signals with street lights, emergency vehicle preemption, interconnect and signing; and provide maintenance and electrical energy for the existing highway lighting system on Trunk Highway No. 100 East and West Ramps at West 701h Street in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth and contained in Agreement No. 75958, a copy of which was before the Council. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the proper City officers be and hereby are authorized to execute such agreement, and thereby assume for and on behalf of the City all of the contractual obligations contained therein. Passed and adopted this 21St day of April, 1997. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) . CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing City Council Minutes is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its special meeting of November 6, 1996 and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this 21" day of April, 1997. Debra A. Wnc n, City Clerk City Hall (612) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 927 -7645 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 927 -5461 w9SN��I� 04 e 0 • �N�bFPoMTE� RESOLUTION RELATING TO PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON S.A.P. 120- 156 -05 FROM WEST 70TH STREET_ TO WEST 78TH STREET IN THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA City of Edina WHERAS, the "City" has planned the improvement of MSAS 156 (Cahill Road) from West 701h Street to West 78'h Street. WHEREAS, the "City ", will be expending Municipal Street Aid Funds on the improvement of this Street, and WHEREAS, this improvement does not provide adequate width for parking on both sides of the street; and approval of the proposed construction as a Municipal State Aid Street project must therefore be conditioned upon certain parking restrictions. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS THEREBY RESOLVED that the "City" shall ban the parking of motor vehicles on the east side of MSAS 156 (Cahill Road) at all times. Dated this 21s' day of April, 1997 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing City Council Minutes is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its special meeting of November 6, 1996 and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this 21" day of April, 1997 D � .- City Hall (612) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 927 -7645 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 927 -5461 �9Zr1A. �J� o e 01 o• '�Y�bAPOMT6 RESOLUTION RELATED TO PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON S.A.P. 120 - 148 -15 FROM VALLEY VIEW ROAD TO DEWEY HILL ROAD IN THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA City of Edina WHEREAS, the "City" has planned the improvement of MSAS 148 (Gleason Road) from Valley View Road to Dewey Hill Road. WHEREAS, the "City ", will be expending Municipal Street Aid funds on the improvement of this Street, and WHEREAS, this improvement does not provide adequate width for parking on both sides of the street; and approval of the proposed construction as a Municipal State Aid .Street project must therefore be conditioned upon certain parking restrictions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the "City ", shall ban the parking of motor vehicles on the west side of MSAS 148 (Gleason Road) at all times. Dated this 21s' day of April, 1997 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing City Council Minutes is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its special meeting of November 6, 1996 and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this 215` day of April, 1997 City Hall (612) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 927 -7645 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 927 -5461 4 91T1A, �1 o e �0 City of Edina RESOLUTION RELATING TO PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON S.A.P. 120 - 145 -20 FROM AMUNDSON AVENUE TO METRO BOULEVARD IN THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA WHEREAS, the "City" has planned the improvement of MSAS 145 -20 (West 70th Street) from France Avenue to Xerxes Avenue. WHEREAS, the "City ", will be expending Municipal Street Aid funds on the improvement of this Street, and WHEREAS, this improvement does not provide adequate width for parking on both sides of the street; and approval of the proposed construction as a Municipal State Aid Street project must therefore be conditions upon certain parking restrictions. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS THEREBY RESOLVED that the "City ", shall ban the parking of motor vehicles on the south side of MSAD 145 -20 (West 70th Street) at all times. Dated this 21St day of April, 1997. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing City Council Minutes is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its special meeting of November 6, 1996 and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this 21St day of April, 1997 Debra A. Mang n, Ci lerk City Hall (612) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 927 -7645 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 927 -5461 1r1A. f� �1 o e �0 City of Edina RESOLUTION RELATING TO PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON S.A.P. 120 - 145 -19 FROM FRANCE AVENUE TO XERXES AVENUE IN THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA WHEREAS, the "City" has planned the improvement of MSAS 145 -19 (West 70th Street) from France Avenue to Xerxes Avenue. WHEREAS, the "City ", will be expending Municipal Street Aid Funds on the improvement of this Street, and WHEREAS, this improvement does not provide adequate width for parking on both sides of the street; and approval of the proposed construction as a Municipal State Aid Street project must therefore be conditioned upon certain parking restrictions. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS THEREBY RESOLVED: That the "City ", shall ban the parking of motor vehicles on both sides of MSAS 145 -19 (West 70th Street) at all times. Dated this 21" day of April, 1997. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA 1 CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing City Council Minutes is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its special meeting of November 6, 1996, and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this 21St day of April, 1997 N Debra A. Mang eh, CAO Clerk City Hall (612) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 927 -7645 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 927 -5461 491N� \IrL o e •' "mnPaN�E° � City of Edina RESOLUTION RELATING TO PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON S.A.P. 120 - 136 -12 FROM XERXES AVENUE TO 285 FEET WEST IN THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA WHEREAS, the "City" has planned the improvement of MSAS 136 (West 76`h Street) from Xerxes Avenue to 285 feet west; and WHEREAS, the "City ", will be expending Municipal Street Aid Funds on the improvement of this Street; and WHEREAS, this improvement does not provide adequate width for parking on both sides of the street; and approval of the proposed construction as a Municipal State Aid Street project must therefore be conditioned upon_ certain parking restrictions. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS THEREBY RESOLVED that, the "City" shall ban the parking of motor vehicles on both sides of MSAS 136 (West 76`h Street) at all times. Dated this 21" day of April, 1997 STATE.OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing City Council Minutes is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its special meeting of November 6, 1996 and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this 215` day of April, 1997 I �X Debra A. Ma gen. i y.Clerk City Hall (612) 927 -8861. 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 927 -7645 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 927 -5461 U) O • �1C ��O s \ CRPOPA X888 RESOLUTION OF CONGRATULATIONS WHEREAS, St. Stephen's Episcopal Church established St. Alban's Episcopal Church as a parochial mission and assisted St. Alban's by supporting the fledgling congregation; and WHEREAS, St. Alban's Episcopal Church was established in 1957 with the congregation initially meeting in local schools and completed its first building in December of 1959 and dedicated its present sanctuary September 30, 1979; and WHEREAS, St. Alban's Episcopal Church has maintained a continuous presence at Valley View and Gleason Roads ministering to and serving the congregation; and WHEREAS, during the past forty years the congregation of St. Alban's Episcopal Church has seen its children and youth grow and mature and go on to live productive lives; and WHEREAS, St. Alban's Episcopal Church has shown commitment to the needs of the greater community of the congregation by being involved with VEAP, Loaves and Fishes, Meals on Wheels, Habitat for Humanity and hosting numerous community groups such as Edina Federated Women, Boy Scouts, Girl Scouts, AA, and Gamblers Anonymous; and WHEREAS, the two Rectors of St. Alban's Episcopal Church, Paul Hallett, from May 1957 to March 1973, and Charles Vogt from November 1973 have shown great leadership and a spirit of cooperation with other churches in the community. NOW, THEREFORE, I, Glenn L. Smith, on behalf of the City Council and the citizens of Edina, hereby extend greetings, appreciation and congratulations to all members of St. Alban's Episcopal Church for their faithful service to the Edina community on the occasion of the:- 40TH ANNIVERSARY - ST. ALBAN'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH as it reflects on the past, celebrates the present and looks to the future. PROCLAIMED this 4`h day of May, 1997. Mayor /1 ^jam tit ch y • ��YCOR�B ��� • RESOLUTION OF COMMENDATION EDINA HIGH SCHOOL 1997 STATE ALPINE CHAMPION JULIE RAMSLAND WHEREAS, Julie Ramsland of the Edina High School 1997 Girls Alpine Ski Team was Champion of the Section 6AA and State Alpine Champion; and WHEREAS, success has come to Julie because of her extraordinary ability, hours of practice and the leadership of her coaches; and WHEREAS, as a representative of the City of Edina, Julie exemplified the highest standards of athletic proficiency and good sportsmanship. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that congratulations be extended to: JULIE RAMSLAND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution be recorded in the Minutes of the Edina City Council and that a copy be given to Julie Ramsland. ADOPTED this 21St day of April, 1997. Glenn L. Smith, Mayor O E' to 01 • ,^C�RPOPAT�v o i88B RESOLUTION OF COMMENDATION EDINA HIGH SCHOOL 1997 GIRLS SKI TEAM WHEREAS, the members of the Edina High School 1997 Girls Alpine Ski Team were Champions of the Classic Lake Conference, Section 6AA Champions and State Champions; and WHEREAS, success has come to the members of the Team because of their extraordinary ability, hours of practice and the leadership of their coaches; and WHEREAS, as representatives of the City of Edina, the members of the Team exemplified the highest standards of athletic proficiency and good sportsmanship. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that congratulations be extended to the members of the Team: Anna Erickson Emily Hanson Kristine Lund Sarah Nelson Roberta Prasciunas Julie Ramsland, Co- Captain Kathryn Toepel, Co- captain Tim Frantzich, Coach Holger Gronwall, Assistant Coach BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution be recorded in the Minutes of the Edina City Council and that copies be given to members of the Team. ADOPTED this 215 day of April, 1997. -QLX,." �� I L-41--X X, Glenn L. Smith, Mayor k. a 'f O PROCLAMATION ARBOR DAY April 25, 1997- WHEREAS, In 1872, J. Sterling Morton proposed to the Nebraska Board of Agriculture that a special day be set aside for the planting of trees, and WHEREAS, This holiday, called Arbor Day, was first observed with the planting of more than a million trees in Nebraska, and WHEREAS, Arbor Day in now observed throughout the nation and the world, and WHEREAS, trees are a most valuable resource, purifying our air, helping conserve our soil and energy, serving as a recreational setting, providing a habitat for, wildlife of all kinds, and enriching our lives in other important ways; and WHEREAS, disease, insects and pollution have damaged and continue to threaten our trees, creating the need for tree care and tree planting programs and fostering greater public concern for the future of our urban forest; and WHEREAS, Edina is proud of the beautiful shade trees which grace our homes and public places; and WHEREAS, Edina has been recognized for the past ten years as a Tree City USA by The National Arbor Day Foundation and desires to continue the planting of trees for its future, NOW, THEREFORE, I Glenn L. Smith, Mayor Edina, do hereby proclaim April 25, 1997, to be Arbor Day and call upon the spirited and foresighted citizens of Edina to plant trees now for our pleasure and that of future generations. Dated this 25`h day of April, 1997 Glenn L. Smith, Mayor City of Edina AGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL APRIL 21, 1997 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Commissioner, Council Member'or citizen so requests it. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the Agenda. * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of HRA Meeting of April 7, 1997 Roucau II. PAYMENT OF HRA CLAIMS as per pre -list dated 4/16/97 TOTAL: $9,594.60 III. ADJOURNMENT .EDINA CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION - ST. ALBANS EPISCOPAL CHURCH RESOLUTION COMMENDING EDINA GIRLS SKI TEAM 1997 STATE CHAMPIONS RESOLUTION COMMENDING JULIE RAMSLAND 1997 STATE SKI ALPINE CHAMPION PROCLAMATION - ARBOR DAY * . I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of April 7, 1997 and Board of Review of April 14, 1997 IL PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS - Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. Zoning. Ordinances: First and Second Reading require 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall of all members of Council to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. Conditional Use Permit: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. Roucau A. Report From April 7. 1997. Hearing, Diversified Pharmaceutical Systems/West 78th Street Proposals * B. Final Development Plan, 3917 -3929 West 501' Street, Edina Properties - Continue to May 5, 1997 Roucau . C. Final Rezoning, R -1 Single Dwelling Units District to PRD -1, Planned Residence Districts, Philip Stephen Company, generally located south of Vernon Avenue and west of Olinger Road Roncau D. Final Plat Approval, Olde Vernon, Philip Stephen Company, generally located south of Vernon Avenue and west of Olinger Road Roncau E. Final Rezoning, R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District to PRD-4, Planned Residence District, 5120 and 5124 France Avenue, Hans Kuhlman Agenda /Edina City Council April 21, 1997 Page 2 III. ORDINANCES First Reading: Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second Reading: Favorable rollcall vote of all Council member to pass. * A. First Reading - Ordinance No. 1997 -5 amending Section 815 Antennas and Towers - continue to May 5, 1997 IV. AWARD OF BIDS * A. Park Bridges and Approaches #96 -5PK * B. Utility Tractor, Park Maintenance Department * C Edina Aquatic Center Main Pool Renovation V. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. Resolution requesting a pre - emption waiver from Food & Drug Administration rules. * B. Set hearing date for proposed Tobacco Sales Ordinance (5/5/97) C. Vacancies on Boards /Committees /Commission, Recycling & Solid Waste Commission - 2 D Art Center Proposal * E. Rehabilitation Water Treatment Plant #2 F. Flood Reduction, 5805 Concord Avenue South, Linda Tillou * G. No Parking Resolutions for Mill /Overlay Improvements No. A -181 & A -182 * H. Cooperative Agreement with MnDOT for improvement at 701h Street & TH 100 1y1 1�91•PL&Li & • _ 1 ' Lei M VII. CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS A. Deer Damage, Dr. George Lund B. Group Home, 491h Street, Gail Dean, David Stein, Vilnis Deme 10061TIA ► \1/_\ • ;� • •- I P • XI. FINANCE Roucau A. Payment of Claims as per pre -list dated 04/16/97 TOTAL: $824,544.81 and for confirmation of payment as pre -list dated 04/08/97 TOTAL $213,036.62 SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS Mon May 5 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mon May 19 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mon May 26 MEMORIAL DAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed Mon Jun 2 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mon Jun 16 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Fri Jul 4 INDEPENDENCE DAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed Mon Jul 7 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mon Jul 21 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS MINUTES OF THE JOINT MEETING OF THE EDINA- HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL APRIL 7, 1997 ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners /Members Faust, Hovland, Kelly, and Chairman Smith. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner /Member Hovland and seconded by Commissioner /Member. Faust to approve and adopt the Consent Agenda items as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Smith Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE HRA MEETING OF MARCH 17. 1997, APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Hovland and seconded by Commissioner Faust approving the Minutes of the Regular HRA Meeting of March 17, 1997. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *BIDS AUTHORIZED FOR MASS GRADING AND 'SALE OF EXCESS GRANULAR MATERIAL (PHASE II OF CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK) Motion made by Commissioner Hovland and seconded by Commissioner Faust authorizing bids for mass grading and sale of excess granular materials for Phase II Centennial Lakes Park. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. AMENDMENTS TO GRANDVIEW REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT #1 - GRANDVIEW AREA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND GRANDVIEW TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN APPROVED Executive Director Hughes reported on February 18, 1997, staff presented a report to. the HRA concerning the, possible acquisition 'of properties identified as Lewis Engineering and Kunz Oil (Parts Plus) within the Grandview Redevelopment Area. On that occasion, the HRA adopted resolutions authorizing acquisition of these properties by eminent domain if necessary. Staff also advised that such resolutions were : dependent upon the HRA adopting amendments to the tax increment financing plan for the Grandview Tax Increment Financing District. Staff has prepared amendments and has provided copies of the amendments to' Hennepin County and the Edina School District as required by State Law. A copy of the proposed amendments, is filed in the office of the City Clerk. Approvals of the - amendment requires adoption of resolutions by both the HRA and the City Council. The proposed amendments provide authority for the HRA to acquire and provide financial or other assistance to the . properties generally referred to as Lewis Engineering and Kunz Oil (Parts Plus): In addition, staff recommends ,the amendments include the possible acquisition of the Edina School District bus storage facility even though the acquisition of this-property is not now being pursued. In our opinion, this is advisable in light of the potential restrictions on tax increment financing that could prohibit such a project in the future. Representatives of the School District have been advised of our proposal to include the bus storage facility acquisition in the proposed amendments. The proposed amendments provide for an acquisition and site development budget of $3,900,000.00. The plan also provides for the use of tax increment to pay interest costs and various administrative expenses allowed by -State Law. As noted earlier, copies of this plan have been sent to Hennepin County and the Edina School District. Hennepin County submitted comments regarding the amendments in correspondence dated March 27, 1997. Jeff Spartz, County Administrator noted this amendment is essentially a technical amendment adjusting the budgeted expenditures of tax increments and recommended no opposition to the amendment be expended. Staff recommends adoption of the amendments. No public comments were received. Commissioner /Member Hovland introduced the following resolution and moved its approval: RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO GRANDVIEW.REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1, GRANDVIEW AREA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND GRANDVIEW TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN AND REQUESTING THE APPROVAL OF THE CITY COUNCIL BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners (the "Board ") of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for.the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "HRA "), as follows: 1. Proposed Amendment. The HRA has approved a redevelopment plan, . as . defined in Minnesota Statutes, 'Section 469.002, subdivision 16, designated as the Grandview Area Redevelopment Plan (the "Redevelopment Plan "), and a redevelopment project to be undertaken pursuant thereto, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.002, subdivision 14 designated as' Grandview Redevelopment Project No., 1 (the "Redevelopment Project "), and that in order to finance the public redevelopment costs to be incurred by the HRA in connection with the Redevelopment Plan and the Redevelopment Project, the HRA has approved a tax increment financing plan, pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, designated as Grandview Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "Financing Plan "), which establishes a tax increment financing district, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subdivision 9, designated by the HRA as Grandview t 'r Tax Increment Financing District (Hennepin County No.. 1202) (the "District"). It has been proposed that the HRA approve amendments to the Redevelopment Project, Redevelopment Plan and Financing Plan which is entitled "Amendments to Grandview Redevelopment Project No. 1, Grandview Area Redevelopment' Plan and Grandview Tax Increment Financing Plan" (the "Amendment "). The Amendment authorizes the acquisition and redevelopment by the HRA of property in the area subject to the Redevelopment Plan and the additional expenditures of tax increment revenues derived from the District to pay public redevelopment costs of the acquisition and redevelopment of such- property by the HRA or another party -and -to pay administrative expenses of the HRA and'City. - 2. Approval of Amendment. The Amendment has been presented to this Board and is ordered placed on file in the office of the Executive Director of the HRA, and the Amendment is hereby approved. The Amendment further serves the original goals and objectives of the City and HRA in approving the Redevelopment Plan, the Redevelopment Project and the Financing Plan, by redeveloping property in the City in order to prevent or reduce blight, blighting factors and the causes of blight. 3. Presentation to City Council. The Amendment hereby approved shall be presented to the City Council for a public hearing thereon pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.029, subdivision 6 and Section 469.175, subdivision 4. Commissioner /Member Kelly seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Smith Resolution adopted. CLAIMS PAID Commissioner Kelly mad_ e a motion to approve payment of the HRA Claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated April 2, 1997, and consisting of one page totaling $14,169.67. Commissioner Hovland seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Smith Motion carried. There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, Chairman Smith declared the meeting adjourned. Executive Director COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, APR 16, 1997, 8:49 PM page 1 CHECK NO ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 13065 04/21/97 $1,187.16 DORSEY & WHITNEY Legal fees 538547 CENTENNIAL LAK PRO FEES LEG /S < *> $1,187.16* 13066 04/21/97 $42.00 Lopez, Kellie parking permit refund 012 50TH STREET PARKING PERMIT < *> $42.00* 13067 04/21/97 $4,890.48 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO Greens mower I146695 CENTENNIAL LAK PARKS 5173 < *> $4,890.48* 13068 04/21/97 $3,474.96 UNITED PROPERTIES Arch fees 032197 CENTENNIAL LAK PRO FEE ARCH /E < *> $3,474.96* $9,594.60* 1 Cn RESOLUTION OF CONGRATULATIONS WHEREAS, St. Stephen's Episcopal Church established St. Alban's Episcopal Church as a parochial mission and assisted St. Alban's. by supporting the fledgling congregation; and WHEREAS, St. Alban's Episcopal Church was established in 1957 with the congregation initially meeting in local schools and completed its first building in December of 1959 and dedicated its present sanctuary September 30, 1979; and WHEREAS, St. Alban's Episcopal Church has maintained a continuous presence at Valley View and Gleason Roads ministering to and serving the congregation; and WHEREAS, during the past forty years the congregation of St. Alban's Episcopal Church has seen its children and youth grow and mature and go on to live productive lives; and WHEREAS, St. Alban's Episcopal Church has shown commitment to the needs of the greater community of the congregation by being involved with VEAP, Loaves and Fishes, Meals on Wheels, Habitat for Humanity and hosting numerous community groups such as Edina Federated Women, Boy Scouts, Girl Scouts, AA, and Gamblers Anonymous; and WHEREAS, the two Rectors of St. Alban's Episcopal Church, Paul Hallett, from May 1957 to March 1973, and Charles Vogt from November 1973 have shown great leadership and a spirit of cooperation with other churches in the community. NOW, THEREFORE, I, Glenn L. Smith, on behalf of the City Council and the citizens of Edina, hereby extend greetings, appreciation and congratulations to all members of St. Alban's. Episcopal Church for their faithful service to the Edina community on the occasion of the: 40TH ANNIVERSARY - ST. ALBAN'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH as it reflects on the past, celebrates the present and looks to the future. PROCLAIMED this 4°i day of May, 1997. Mayor wg1�,r� Ow e ISao RESOLUTION OF COMMENDATION EDINA -HIGH SCHOOL 1997 GIRLS SKI TEAM WHEREAS, the members of the Edina High School 1997 Girls Alpine Ski Team were Champions of the Classic Lake Conference, Section 6AA Champions and State Champions; and WHEREAS, success has come to the members of the Team because of their extraordinary ability, hours of practice and the leadership of their coaches; and WHEREAS, as representatives of the City of Edina, the members of the Team exemplified the highest standards of athletic proficiency and good sportsmanship. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that congratulations be extended to the members of the Team: Anna Erickson Julie.Ramsland, Co- Captain Emily Hanson Kathryn Toepel, Co- captain Kristine Lund Tim Frantzich, Coach Sarah Nelson Holger Gronwall, Assistant Coach Roberta Prasciunas BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution be recorded in the Minutes of the Edina City Council and that copies be given to members of the Team. ADOPTED this 21St day of April, 1997. Glenn L. Smith, Mayor A. ow e Cn • ,�C�RPOR�'���/ 1986 RESOLUTION OF COMMENDATION EDINA HIGH SCHOOL 1997 STATE ALPINE CHAMPION JULIE RAMSLAND WHEREAS, Julie Ramsland of the Edina High School 1997 Girls Alpine Ski Team was Champion of the Section 6AA and State Alpine Champion; and WHEREAS, success has come to Julie because of her extraordinary ability, hours of practice and the leadership of her coaches; and WHEREAS, as a representative of the City of Edina, Julie exemplified the highest standards of athletic proficiency and good sportsmanship. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that congratulations be extended to: JULIE RAMSLAND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution be recorded in the Minutes of the Edina City Council and that a copy be given to Julie Ramsland. ADOPTED this 21s' day of April, 1997. Glenn L. Smith, Mayor A.f� o E; g o • ,NCORPORAAF'p� fees PROCLAMATION ARBOR DAY April 25, 1997 WHEREAS, In 1872, J. Sterling Morton proposed to the Nebraska Board of Agriculture that a special day be set aside for the planting of trees, and WHEREAS, This holiday, called Arbor Day, was first observed with the planting of more than a million trees in Nebraska, and WHEREAS, Arbor Day in now observed throughout the nation and the world, and WHEREAS, trees are a most valuable resource, purifying our air, helping conserve our soil and energy, serving as a recreational setting, providing a habitat for wildlife of all kinds, and enriching our lives in other important ways; and WHEREAS, disease, insects and pollution have damaged and continue to threaten our trees, creating the need for tree care and tree planting programs and fostering greater public concern for the future of our urban forest; and WHEREAS, Edina is proud of the beautiful shade trees which grace our homes and public places; and WHEREAS, Edina has been recognized for the past ten years as a Tree City USA by The National Arbor Day Foundation and desires to continue the planting of trees for its future, NOW, THEREFORE, I Glenn L. Smith, Mayor Edina, do hereby proclaim April 25, 1997, to be Arbor Day and call upon the spirited and foresighted citizens of Edina to plant trees now for our pleasure and that of future generations. Dated this 25'x' day of April, 1997 Glenn L. Smith, Mayor City of Edina MINUTES OF THE JOINT MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL AND THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY HELD AT CITY HALL APRIL 7, 1997 - 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Faust, Hovland, Kelly and Mayor Smith. CONSENT AGENDA Motion made by Member Hovland approve the Consent Agenda items as presented with Fire Works Display, 1997 4' of July Celebration, III. Improvement and III. K. Water Treatment Chemicals. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Smith Motion carried. and seconded by Member Faust to the exception of Agenda Item III. A. C. Lake Cornelia Park Playground *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MARCH 17, 1997, APPROVED Motion made by Member Hovland and seconded by Member Faust approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of March 17, 1997. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. 1997 EDINA BOYS STATE HOCKEY CHAMPIONS RECOGNIZED Mayor Smith, commended the 1997 Edina Boys Hockey. Team who won the Classic Lake Conference, Section 6AA Championship. Resolutions of Commendation were presented each team member as ambassadors of the City of Edina who represented the highest standards of athletic proficiency and good sportsmanship. PUBLIC HEARING HELD: RESOLUTION ADOPTED APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO GRANDVIEW REDEVLEOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1, GRANDVIEW AREA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND GRADVIEW TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN Assistant City Manager Hughes reported on February 18, 1997, staff presented a report to the Edina HRA concerning the possible acquisition of properties identified as Lewis Engineering and Kunz Oil (Parts Plus) within the Grandview Redevelopment Area. On that occasion, the HRA adopted resolutions authorizing acquisition of these properties by eminent domain if necessary. Staff also advised that such resolutions were dependent upon the HRA and City Council adopting amendments to the tax increment financing plan for the Grandview Tax Increment Financing District. Staff has prepared amendments and has provided copies of the amendments to Hennepin County and the Edina School District as required by State Law. A copy of the proposed amendments, is filed in the office of the City Clerk. Approval of the amendments requires adoption of resolutions by both the HRA and the City Council. The proposed amendments provide authority for the HRA to acquire and provide financial or other_ assistance to the properties generally referred to as Lewis Engineering and Kunz Oil (Parts Plus). In addition, staff recommends the amendments include the possible acquisition of the Edina School District bus storage facility even though the acquisition of this property is not now being pursued. In staff's opinion, this is advisable because of potential legislation restricting tax increment financing that could prohibit such a project in the future. School District representative have been advised the City's proposal includes the but storage facility acquisition in the proposed amendments. The proposed amendments provide for an acquisition and site development budget of $3,900,000.00. The plan also provides for the use of tax increments to pay interest costs and various administrative expenses allowed by State Law. As noted earlier, copies of this plan have been sent to Hennepin County and the Edina School District. Hennepin County submitted comments ec� i regarding the amendments in correspondence dated March. 27, 1997. - Jeff Spartz, County Administrator noted this amendment is essentially a technical amendment adjusting the budgeted expenditures of tax increments and recommended no opposition to the amendment. Staff recommends adoption of the amendments. No public comments were received. Member Faust introduced the following resolution and moved its approval: RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO GRANDVIEW REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1, GRANDVIEW AREA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND GRANDVIEW TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN AND MAIN FINDINGS WITH RESPECT THERETO BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota as follows: 1. The Commissioners of the Housing and Redevelopment authority in and for the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "HRA ") and the City of Edina, Minnesota ( "the City "), have previously approved the Grandview Area Redevelopment Plan (the "Redevelopment Plan ") to be undertaken pursuant thereto, and in order to finance the public redevelopment costs to be incurred by the City and the HRA in connection with the Redevelopment Plan and Redevelopment Project, the HRA and the City have approved Grandview Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "Financing Plan "), which establishes a tax increment financing district which is designated by the HRA as the Grandview Tax Increment Financing District (Hennepin County No. 1202) (the "District "). The HRA has approved an amendment to the Redevelopment Project, the Redevelopment, Plan and the Tax Increment Financing Plan which is entitled "Amendments to Grandview Redevelopment Project No. 1, Grandview Area Redevelopment Plan and Grandview Tax Increment Financing Plan" (the "Amendment'). The Amendment authorizes the acquisition and redevelopment by the HRA of the Property in the area subject to the Redevelopment plan and the additional expenditures of tax increment revenues derived from the District to pay public redevelopment costs of the acquisition and redevelopment of such property by the HRA or another party and to pay administrative expenses of the HRA and City. 2. This Council on April 7, 1997, held a public hearing on the Amendment after notice of the public hearing was published in the official newspaper of the City not less than ten (10) days prior to the date of the hearing. At such public hearing all persons desiring to be heard with respect to the Amendment were given an opportunity to express their views with respect thereto. 3. This Council has previously found that the District is a redevelopment district within the scope of Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subdivision 10 and the Amendment will not change such prior findings. The Amendment further serves the original goals and objectives of the City and HRA in approving the Redevelopment Plan, the Redevelopment Project and the Financing Plan, by redeveloping property in the City in order to prevent or reduce blight, blighting factors and the causes of blight. 4. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, subdivision 4, it is hereby found that (A) The District, is a redevelopment district, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subdivision 10, for the reasons set forth in previous findings by this Council, and the Amendment does not alter these previous findings. (B) The proposed development to be undertaken in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan, as amended by the Amendment, in the opinion of this Council would not occur solely through private investment within the reasonable foreseeable future and therefor the use of tax increment financing is deemed necessary. (C) The Financing Plan, as amended by the Amendment, conforms to the general plan for the development of the City as a whole. (D) The Financing Plan, as amended by the .Amendment, will afford maximum opportunity consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole for the development of the area subject to Redevelopment Plan by private enterprise. (E) The City confirms its election of the method of tax increment computation set forth in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, subdivision 3, clause (1) with respect to the District. Passed by the Council this 7 1 day of April, 1997. Attest: City Clerk - Member Kelly seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Smith Resolution adopted. Mayor FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN, 3917 -3929 WEST 50TH STREET, EDINA PROPERTIES CONTINUED TO APRIL 21, 1997 Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Presentation By Planner Planner Larsen informed the Council the subject property is zoned PCD -2, : Planned Commercial District -2, and is developed with a one story concrete block and brick building.'The existing building occupies approximately one half of the site with paved area occupying the remaining lot area. The City's municipal parking ramp and service tunnel are located south of the subject property with the Edina Theatre located to the east and.a retail office building, adjacent to the west. Planner Larsen explained the proponents have. submitted. Final. Development Plan application to redevelop the site. The plan includes demolishing the existing structure and replacing it with a two story building plus basement. The plan includes a first floor retail area with the basement area occupied by storage and a restaurant. The second floor would be occupied by an expansion of the Edina Theatre to include four new screens with 798 seats. The second floor theater area will be connected by a walk- bridge from the existing Edina Theatre. The plan includes widening of the walk- way alley between the theater and the proposed building and would provide direct access from the ramp. Planner Larsen noted the proposed plan is architecturally similar to a plan reviewed by the City Council in June of 1996. The previous plan proposed 'a four story redevelopment for the site when reviewed by the .Planning Commission. The plan was reduced to three stories when presented to Council. Ultimately,.the'Council approved a two story plan. The approved plan could have a maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of no more than 1.5, which is the maximum allowed in the PCD -2 District-The plan currently before Council has a FAR of 1.43. In addition, the proposed development intensity is consistent with the 50th and France Redevelopment Plan. The proposed building height is 47.5 feet or the same as the adjacent theater. The building complies with the City's height regulations of fifty feet or four stories in the PCD -2 district. Planner Larsen reminded Council the Zoning Ordinance .requires one parking space .for each 200 square feet of floor area for general retail. At this, rate the new building would create a parking demand of 128 spaces. The four theaters in the proposed building have a total of 798 seats. In the 501h and France context, the theater, is considered part of a shopping center for parking purposes. At one space for each 10 seats, the theater creates a demand for an additional 80 parking spaces. Planner Larsen submitted recommendations from the Engineering Department relative to the design of the entrances to the South Ramp. The west entrance onto the second level will require stairs due to the height difference between the tunnel and parking ramp. The east entrance onto the ramp's second level will require a ramp system to meet ADA guidelines. Planner Larsen noted that in addition to the skyway connecting the proposed addition to the existing theater, the developers plan a canopy over the pedestrian walkway connecting the parking ramp to 501h Street. A similar canopy was included in the previously approved plan. The canopy would be a joint venture between the City's HRA and Edina Properties. . Planner Larsen reviewed the results of a parking survey taken between March 1 and 29, 1997 of the 501h and France Avenue Municipal Parking. He explained staff focused on Saturday when both retail and theater use would be operating. The survey included all three municipal ramps and the 49'/2 Street surface lot. The data gathered was used to calculate the average percentage of occupancy in each lot in two time periods: before 4:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. or later. The following are the results of the survey: Percentage of Parking Utilized on Saturdays between March 1 & 29, 1997 Before 4:00 4:OO or Later North Ramp 61% 30% Clancy's Lot 93% 68% Middle Ramp 76% 63% South Ramp 65% 56% Planner Larsen noted it has been proposed to re -sign the contract parking portions of the ramps to read "Contract Parking 8:00 a.m. until 6:00 p.m." freeing additional parking for theater patrons. Planner Larsen concluded the Planning Commission recommends Final Development Plan approval subject to: Is 1. Modification of the plan to conform with the Engineering Department's recommendations; 2. Payment of parking assessment for use of public parking; and 3. Development Agreement with HRA covering the proposed canopy. Planner Larsen introduced John Pazanhanick, Director of Store Development for Edina Properties, the proponent.. Mr. Pazanhanick stated he would be available to answer any questions. Council Discussion Member Kelly stated he would be abstaining from discussion and voting since he has previously done work for Cineplex Odeon. Mayor Smith noted the need for a three fifths vote on Final Development Plans. He asked Mr. Pazanhanick, in light of Member Maetzold's absence and Member Kelly abstaining, if the proponent would prefer to continue consideration of their plan until the next Council meeting. Mr. Pazanhanick requested the Council continue consideration of Edina Properties' Final Development Plan until April 21, 1997. Member Hovland made a motion to continue consideration of Final Development Plan for 3917- 3929 West 501h Street until April 21, 1997. Member Faust seconded the motion. Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Smith Kelly abstained Motion carried. CONSIDERATION OF CURB CUT DELAYED UNTIL APRIL 21, 1997 DIVERSIFIED PHARMACEUTICAL SYSTEMS (DPS) FACILITY (W. 78T" STREET.) Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Staff Presentations Planner Larsen reminded Council the subject property is completely located within -the City of Bloomington, south of W. 78th St. and west of Cecilia Circle. The site is approximately eleven acres in size. Planner Larsen reviewed the proposed recommendations Council is, being asked to consider: 1) Authorize the City Manager to execute the Letter .of Understanding between Liberty and the City (he noted John Gattuso of Liberty Property has signed the draft letter), 2) Authorize the necessary curb cut permits, and 3) Authorize staff to develop a Joint Powers Agreement with the City of Bloomington to cover construction of the recommended roadway improvements, including the signalization of West 78th St. and Cecilia- Circle. Planner Larsen reviewed the four major points contained in the draft Letter of Understanding: 1. Liberty would agree to pay a minimum of $261,000 but no more than $281,000 to Edina towards the cost of the roadway improvements to W. 78th St. Liberty's contribution includes the signalization of Cecilia Circle and approximately '/2 of roadway improvement between Cecilia Circle and the west boundary of Liberty's property. 2. Liberty agrees to provide a - landscaping plan and schedule acceptable to Edina and in conformance with Bloomington's requirements. The plan will emphasize screening along the north side of the parking structure and surface, parking lot. The landscaping shall be subject to final approval of the Edina Planning Director and the Bloomington Planning Manager. Liberty would agree to post a landscape performance bond or suitable security with the City of Bloomington guaranteeing all plant materials for two growing seasons. Liberty assumes maintenance responsibility for all plantings within the public right of way. • 3. Liberty agrees to move the westerly access to the parking structure as. far to the south as practicable. Liberty also agrees to provide a right turn lane at the "ceremonial" entrance from east bound W. 78th St. 4. Liberty agrees to enter into a Deed Restriction in favor of Edina relative to the construction of an additional office building in the northwesterly expansion area identified on the April 3, 1997 RSP site plan. • Plans for the additional building on the site will be submitted to Edina for site plan, landscaping and design review. • Any additional building on the site shall be limited to 27 feet in height, measured from the average ground elevation along the northerly elevation of the building. • Any additional building on the site shall be limited to a total gross floor area of 48,000 sq. ft., as defined in the City of Edina Zoning Ordinance. • Liberty will not construct an additional building on the site for any tenant except for occupancy by DPS, any other affiliate of Smith Kline Beecham Health Care Service, or its contract providers, and will not subdivide the property to create a new lot for an additional, speculative building. Mayor Smith asked why the developer changed from the last meeting when he stated that Liberty they would build no additional buildings before obtaining Edina's approval, to the current proposal of potentially only one building not more than 48,000 sq. ft. He also asked how Edina's setback rules would apply to the DPS proposal and whether the proposed landscaping would meet Edina's requirements. Planner Larsen replied Edina's setback requirements would be thirty-five feet or the height of the building, whichever is greater, therefore, in this case it would be thirty -five feet. He stated the landscaping, as proposed is significantly above Edina's requirements and those of the City of Bloomington. Mayor Smith asked if the Cecilia Circle curb cut would be for the exclusive use of the Liberty Property site. Planner Larsen replied the curb cut would not establish a way to access property south of DPS. Member Hovland suggested the concerns raised by the Dewey Hills residents be addressed in the Letter of Understanding, such as traffic management signs minimizing use of the ceremonial drive. He questioned how the single parking entrance was arrived at for the ceremonial drive and how Liberty's contribution to the roadway improvement was calculated. Planner Larsen explained it is believed with the addition of the right turn lane on W. 78`h and southern location of the parking entrance, adequate stacking will be created for cars entering the parking structure. Preliminary engineering estimates indicate the Liberty portion would be $261,000. Liberty has agreed to pay at least this amount and up to an additional $20,000. Planner Larsen stated if the true cost of the improvements is less than $261,000 Edina would retain the difference. If the costs exceed $281,000 Edina would pay the additional costs. Mayor Smith asked if both the City of Edina -and the City of Bloomington would be named on the landscaping bond. Planner Larsen replied it was decided after discussing this issue with the City Attorney, that only the City of Bloomington would be named on the bond. Attorney Gilligan noted the method for handling claims against the landscaping bond could be addressed in the Joint .Powers Agreement between Edina and Bloomington. Member Kelly noted that the deed restrictions offered in the Letter of Understanding are not the deed restrictions offered by Mr. Gattuso at the March 17, 1997 meeting. He asked if the allowing the City to exercise only architectural control and limiting the building size resulted from negotiation. Planner Larsen answered that after the last meeting Mr. Gattuso talked with his client and was informed of the possibility of a need to provide daycare for their employees. Mayor Smith noted that Mr. Gattuso will have an opportunity to respond to this issue after the staff presentations are complete. Presentation by Ene iq neer • Engineer Hoffman explained staff has been reviewing the fourteen roadway projects noted in the SRF Traffic Study presented to the Council March 17, 1997. Staff has ' ascertained which projects are achievable during 1997 and 1998. Beginning at the east end of W. 78' St. Engineer Hoffman outlined the improvements and proposed year of construction. • East Bush Lake Rd. & W. 78th St. to be modified improving capacity, constructed by Hennepin County, Bloomington and Edina during 1997 • W 781h St. & Cahill Rd. from just east of E. Bush Lake Rd. to Cecilia Circle improvements planned for 1997 ' • Cecilia Circle down and through Gleason area, DPS would pay for a portion of this improvement including engineering costs. The signal at Cecilia would be similar to 82nd & Knox, with restrictions on traffic flow to the north. The proposed roadway concept is five lanes with medians in the middle and turn lanes. Loop detectors will be placed at Glasgow and Lochmere to create west bound gaps for traffic turning onto W. 78th St. • Signal at Gleason and W: 78th St. - Bloomington has indicated they will pay for half of the costs. If Edina intends to use State Aid Gas Tax, the intersection must meet signal warrants. Engineer Hoffman indicated at this time he does not think the road meets warrants. • Braemar Frontage Road - Engineer Hoffman believes this improvement must be tied in with the signal at Gleason Road. Funding for the improvements would come from Edina's state aid gas tax, Bloomington's state aid gas tax and the developers contribution of up to $281,000.00. Engineer Hoffman noted additional issues for consideration include the cut through traffic, speed issues and the school bus stop. He suggested involving area neighbors before deciding the locations of school bus stops. Member Hovland asked if the schedule for the proposed improvements would coincide with construction and opening of the DPS building. Engineer Hoffman answered that yes all the proposed improvements should be completed by the fall of '98. Member Hovland asked when the proposed school bus /mass transit stop east of Lochmere would be installed, and suggested staff investigate installing the stop as soon as possible.. Engineer Hoffman replied the City could install the stop immediately, but could not use state aid funds. However, staff believes the neighbors may decide a different solution is better for their neighborhood. Member Faust asked if the area proposed fora bus stop could be used for a right turn lane. Engineer Hoffman replied it is possible. However, staff did not' envision installing right turn lanes at every intersection because of right of way issues. Member Faust urged staff investigate the installation wherever possible. Mayor Smith asked about the Bloomington project for signal and geometric changes at West Bush Lake Road and W. 78th Street. He noted this project was slated for 1998 subject to Bloomington obtaining funding and questioned if a firm construction date has been determined. Engineer Hoffman answered that Bloomington intends to make the improvement, however, their Capital Improvement Plan had not been finalized. Staff will pursue this issue with Bloomington to obtain an end date for the project's construction. Member Hovland questioned timing of the signal installation at Gleason and W. 78th St. Engineer Hoffman stated the Dewey Hill residents are requesting help in obtaining east bound gaps in traffic to aid turning onto W. 78th St. He repeated the need to achieve a balance and not install a signal before the frontage road is in place to stop cut through traffic. Timing of the installations will be critical due to the upcoming state project on TH 169. Installing the Gleason signal too soon will bring traffic off of TH169 and 62 Crosstown into Edina as motorists try to avoid construction zones. Member Kelly asked if staff will be eliciting final construction dates in the Joint Powers Agreement with Bloomington for projects over which Bloomington has jurisdiction:. Engineer Hoffman replied affirmatively. Presentation by Police Chief Police Chief Bemhjelm informed the Council checked with the School District and was informed presently students are picked ,up and .dropped off only on the north side of W. 78th St. Therefore, the School District believes there is no reason to operate the school bus stop arms since.no student must cross opposing traffic. He added the State Patrol does not recommend attempting to stop traffic on a four -lane road with bus stop arms. Chief Bernhjelm noted the addition of a bus stop would improve safety for the buses and their passengers. Chief Bernhjelm stated the speed limits on W. 78th St.- are .set by MnDOT following studies of the area and engineering analysis. The speed limits on W. 78th St. are clearly posted. Currently the speed limit changes from 40 mph (west of Glasgow Drive) to 35 mph (east of Glasgow Drive). He recommended . after the proposed roadway and safety improvements are complete the City request a speed limit review by MnDOT. Chief Bernhjelm suggested additional speed limit attention be given by: • Deployment of the State Patrol radar trailer for advising drivers in the area about their speed. (The State's trailer is available on a limited basis.) • Creation of a joint powers agreement with Bloomington for joint enforcement authority on this roadway. Edina has a similar arrangement on.Minnesota Drive that works well. • Use of additional patrols using laser and radar speed measurement. Chief Bernhjelm reported the base line data on traffic volume and origin and destination are being gathered on Gleason Rd. and Delaney Blvd., north of W. 78th St. Staff will gather volume data on Long Brake Trail. These data will be used for comparison with post- construction data to determine the most efficient ways to minimize traffic impact in the residential neighborhoods. City Manager Presentation Manager Rosland noted staff has met with both the developer and the City of Bloomington. Staff is in the process of finalizing two formal agreements, a Letter of Understanding with Liberty Property and a joint powers agreement with the City of Bloomington. Manager Rosland believes Bloomington will do everything within their ability to accomplish their portion of the proposed improvements by the time the DPS building is complete in the fall of 1998. Manager Rosland pointed out that staff is gathering traffic statistics to make available data needed to make decisions on the entire City. He cautioned installation of the Gleason signal too early could make further problems on Gleason Road and urged waiting until the City is able to install the "Braemar" frontage road or such time as warrants are met at Gleason. Manager Rosland informed Council Bloomington has agreed to reviewed their density in the corridor south of W. 78th St. during their Comprehensive Plan Review. Proponent Comment John. Gattuso stated his desire to clarify a point with regard to the second phase. He stated, "When I was before you at our last meeting, I made the statement that we will come before Edina for approval on that project. If you read the Memorandum of Understanding that I signed it says very clearly that we will come before Edina for approval of architecture and land development which was my agreement and furthermore this represents a greater- limitation on development not a lesser." Public Comment , Bruce - Malkerson, Suite 1500 AT & T Tower, 901 Marquette Avenue, Minneapolis, MN, stated he represented Dewey Hill III Townhome Association, Inc. and the Association is concerned over the impact the DPS development will have on their homes as stated in his April 1, 1997 letter to the Council. Mr. Malkerson stated he had major concern over the ceremonial entrance to the DPS property and its negative impact on traffic and subsequent impact on the Dewey Hill residents. Mr. Malkerson requested language be added to the curb cut permit. He suggested the curb cut be linked to the building size of phase one of the DPS development and suggested requiring an amendment to the curb cut for any additional development. Mr. Malkerson expressed concern regarding the speed limit on W. 78th St. and the safety issue speeding causes. Mr. Malkerson stated the Dewey Hill entrance at Lochmere and W. 78th St. will be gravely impacted by the development. He asked for immediate installation of the signal at Gleason Road. Mr. Malkerson also requested additional police enforcement on W. 78th St. Robert Bennet, 7600 Delaney Boulevard, echoed the concerns as stated by Mr. Malkerson. He added that John Gattuso of Liberty Property is backing out of an agreement made before the City Council March 17, 1997. Mr.' Bennet stated he did not believe the proposed Joint Powers Agreement deals with additional development/redevelopment that will occur after DPS is built. He thinks the traffic study was not comprehensive enough in dealing with the traffic generated south of W. 78th St. Mr. Bennet suggested Liberty be requested to deposit monies for future traffic management. He understands that decisions regarding traffic signals are questions of balance. Mr. Bennet reminded Council of his previous suggestion to turn Delaney into a cul de sac. Mr. Bennet asked what plans have been made to handle construction traffic occuring before the road improvements are built. Mr. Bennet concluded urging the Council to lessen the size of the proposed development now if possible. Harold Grossman, 7782 Lochmere Terrace,'noted he is the president of the Dewy Hill Home Owners Association. Mr. Grossman stated getting onto W. 781h St. from Lochmere Terrace to go east is currently like committing hari kari and the situation will become much worse with the additional traffic generated by this huge development. In addition to the speed of the traffic, W. 78th St. is curved making it even more dangerous. Mr. Grossman stated a light is needed before someone is badly injured. He added the ceremonial drive is a bad idea and will become a traffic nightmare for the residents to the north of the development. Mr. Grossman urged the ceremonial drive be moved or not constructed at all. Mary Jo Kingston, 7774 Lochmere Terrace noted her appreciation for the opportunity to speak. She expressed concern over the traffic danger the development will bring to the area, especially the ceremonial drive opposite Lochmere Terrace. Ms. Kingston stated that Steve Ellingson, DPS's engineer assured her earlier in the planning process that a signal would be installed at Lochmere and W. 781h St. Now, Ms. Kingston finds there is no signal planned. She urged Council and staff to use all their creativity to find a. workable solution for the traffic, in the area and to protect the residents, especially Lochmere Terrace. Elaine Sampson, 7751 Shaughnessy Road explained she is a Dewey Hill resident one street west of Lochmere. Ms. Sampson pointed out the solutions discussed seem to only be .short term in nature and urged consideration be given to the need for widening the bridges to support 1 -494 eastbound. She added she supports the installation of a light at Gleason and noted the City's notification process should have been larger allowing Gleason resident. to give input at this time. Harold Grossman asked the developer how, they intend to control the parking of 1,200 to 1,500 employees. He explained he only has 120 employees and finds he cannot control where they park. He does not believe the ceremonial drive will be controlled. Council Discussion /Action Member Kelly told Mr. Gattuso he appreciated the effort made to work with the community on the DIPS project. However, he stated his extreme disappointment in the deed restrictions stated in the proposed "Letter of Understanding ". Member Kelly continued that Mr. Gattuso previously gave a commitment when he appeared at the March 17, 1997, meeting. He noted that Council meetings are recorded and can be transcribed if necessary. Member Kelly noted ' his displeasure at being let down in front of Edina's citizens. Member Kelly told Mr. Gattuso that if Mr. Gattuso thought he was not able to follow through on his previous commitment he should have informed Council at the previous meeting. Council would have had an opportunity to deliberate the issue. Member Kelly noted Mr. Malkerson brought up a good point. in proposing the curb cut be limited to the first building. Member Faust stated she sympathizes with persons attempting to enter W. 78th St. from the neighborhood. She urged the City to get the frontage road and signal installed as soon as possible to help entering W. 78th St. Member Faust asked if the City could legally ask for a deposit against future traffic problems. Attorney Gilligan replied he will research this issue, but typically the City would specially assess benefited properties. Member Faust asked about the recommendation of whether or not a cul de sac should be installed on Delaney. Manager Rosland noted staff believes this is not the time to cul de sac Delaney since traffic would be pushed up other residential streets. Staff is looking for a more balanced solution. He suggested the Cahill signal could help the traffic. Member Faust requested the frontage road installation get a high priority and that the City monitor speed on W. 78th St. and study the issue of potentially making Delaney into a cul de sac. Member Hovland agreed- with staff that installing a signal at Gleason -is premature at this time. The frontage road should be made a priority and the Gleason Road neighbors should be involved in discussion of traffic measures in their neighborhood. Member Hovland suggested the City go to MnDOT immediately requesting a speed limit reduction. He suggested the Lochmere /Glasgow school bus stop be done immediately to increase safety .of school children. Member Hovland acknowledged the difficulty exiting Lochmere onto W. 78`h St. and requested the data available on this intersection be reviewed. He suggested installation of the underground foundations for a signal be completed at Lochmere and the ceremonial drive when the roadway improvements are constructed. Member Hovland stated his frustration that Edina cannot have more authority over the land use decisions in this situation. He agreed with Member Kelly's concern with the developers representation to Council at the previous meeting as compared with the present meeting. He noted the need for negotiation and compromise, but added that the amendment to the curb cut should be investigated. Mayor Smith noted the concern of the Council when a developer offers different messages at each meeting. He continued stating many excellent suggestions were offered tonight and an agreement will be reached when Edina's parameters are met. He outlined the following points: 1. The City Attorney is directed to research whether or not the requested curb cut can be based upon land use. This should be done in addition to deed restrictions. 2. Get a better definition of the potential uses for the "ceremonial drive ". The City does not want this to become a truck entrance 3. Strengthen of the proposed signage throughout the site and parking structure. 4. Obtain a deadline date for the completion of the Bloomington intersection improvement. 5. Move forward immediately on a request for speed limit reduction. 6. Develop a future traffic assessment agreement, similar to the parking assessments in the 50`h & France area. 7. Develop a plan and subsequent agreement for handling traffic during construction. 8. Lobby MnDOT for Bush Lake Road bridge widening. 9. Elicit a distinct agreement from Bloomington regarding future Bloomington development in the corridor south of W. 78`h St. 10. Install everything except the actual lights for signals at Gleason Road. Look into funding and if deemed necessary install this light before warrants are met. 11. Involve the neighbors in working out the best neighborhood solution to the school bus stop locations and report findings. Manager Rosland stated staff will formulate the Letter of Understanding and Joint Powers Agreement including the items noted by Council and present them for consideration at the April 21, 1997 meeting. Member Hovland asked if any similar agreement exists where similar planning constraints are in place. Attorney Gilligan answered a like agreement exists on Minnesota Drive with the City of Eden Prairie. Member Kelly. made a motion that the legal documents with the developer and the legal documents with the City of Bloomington be structured to include the aforementioned points and brought back for consideration at the April 21, 1997 Council meeting. Member Faust seconded the motion. Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Smith Motion carried. *PUBLIC HEARING DATE OF APRIL 21, 1997, SET FOR PLANNING MATTERS Motion made by Member Hovland and seconded by Member Faust setting April 21, 1997, as hearing date for planning matters: 1. Final Rezoning, R -1 Single Dwelling Units District to PRD -1, Planned Residence districts, Philip Stephen Company, generally located south of Vernon Avenue and west of Olinger Road; 2. Final Plat Approval, Olde Vernon, Philip Stephen Company, generally located south of Vernon Avenue and west of Olinger Road; 3., Final Rezoning, R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District to PRD-4, Planned Residence district, 5120 and 5124 France Avenue, Hans Kuhlman; and 4. Amendments to Edina City Code, Zoning Section 815, the "Antenna Ordinance ". Motion carried on rollcall vote -four ayes. *LOT DIVISION GRANTED - 5451 AND 5501 GROVE STREET Motion made by Member Hovland and seconded by Member Faust approving a lot division at 5451 and 5501 Grove Street. RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the- following described tracts of land consisting of a vacant Outlot _would combine two developed parcels with frontage on Grove Street. Lot 1, Block 1, WARDEN ACRES DAHLE REPLAT and Lot 2, Block 1, WARDEN ACRES DAHLE REPLAT and OUTLOT A, WARDEN ACRES DAHLE REPLAT WHEREAS, the owners of the described tracts of land constitute two separate tracts of land constitute two separate parcels:, WESTERLY PARCEL: (19,959 square feet) Lot 1, Block 1, WARDEN ACRES DAHLE REPLAT. and that part of Outlot A, WARDEN ACRES DAHLE REPLAT which lies westerly of the easterly 75.00 feet thereof; AND EASTERLY PARCEL: (20,469•square feet) Lot 2, Block 1, WARDEN ACRES DAHLE REPLAT and the easterly 75.00 feet of Outlot A, WARDEN ACRES DAHLE REPLAT. WHEREAS, it :has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Code Sections 810 and 850. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Code Section 810 and Code Section 850 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. SIXTY DAY EXTENSION ' FOR ACTION ON FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN (5229 EDEN VENUE )Planner Larsen explained the deadline for initial action on the Final Development Plan request of 5229 Eden Avenue expires May 6, 1997. The Planning Commission will not hear the request until their April 30, 1997 meeting. Therefore, the earliest date the City Council could hear the request will be.May 19, 1997 or after the initial action expiration date. Planner Larsen stated staff is recommending Council grant a sixty day extension for action on the request. Member Hovland made a motion granting an extension for action ,until July. 6, 1997 for the Final Development Plan request at 5229 Eden Avenue, Four S Properties and Gordon Lewis. Member Kelly seconded the motion. Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Smith Motion carried. BID AWARDED FOR 1997 4T" OF JULY FIREWORKS DISPLAY CELEBRATION Member Hovland said he removed the 1997 4 `h of July fireworks display from the consent agenda for further explanation of the purchase. Director Keprios explained the Council has set the limit of the amount to be spent on the annual fireworks display. Member Hovland made a motion for award of bid'for the 1997 4" of July fire works display celebration to sole bidder RES Specialty Pyrotechnics at $7,600.00. Member Faust seconded the motion. Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Smith Motion carried. *AWARD OF BID FOR THREE SEASON GAZEBO FOR CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK Motion of Member Hovland and seconded by Member Faust for award of bid for three season gazebo for Centennial Lakes Park to recommended low bidder, Cornerstone Construction at $12,850.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes,. BID AWARDED FOR LAKE CORNELIA PARK PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT AND LANDSCAPING Mayor Smith removed the Lake Cornelia Park playground equipment and landscaping bid award from the consent agenda questioning the Edina Federated Women's Club donation of $16,000.00. Director Keprios explained the funds have been received from the Club and are being held in an, account earmarked for the project. Member Hovland made a motion for award of bid for, playground equipment and landscaping for the Cornelia Lake Playground to recommended low bidder, Arrigoni Brothers Company at $225,057.50. Member Faust seconded the motion. Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Smith Motion carried. *BIDS REJECTED FOR 50TH AND FRANCE LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS Motion made by Member Hovland and seconded by Member Faust to reject the bids received for 50" and France landscape improvements. The project will be re -bid as two separate projects. . Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *AWARD OF BID FOR ONE FULL -SIZE 4 DOOR SEDAN (FIRE DEPARTMENT) Motion made by Member Hovland and seconded by Member Faust for award of bid for one full -size 1997 Dodge Intrepid 4 -door sedan to Brookdale Dodge, Inc., through State of Minnesota Cooperative Purchasing Agreement Contract 414105 Permit #501523 at $16,211.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *PARK BRIDGES AND APPROACHES ( #96 -5PK) BID AWARD CONTINUED TO APRIL 21. 1997 Motion made by Member Hovland and seconded by Member Faust to continue the award of bid for park bridges and approaches ( #96 -5PK) to the meeting of April 21, 1997. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *AWARD OF BID FOR PARK FENCING BIRCHCREST PARK, CHOWEN PARK AND COUNTRYSIDE PARK Motion made by Member Hovland and seconded by Member Faust for award of bid for park fencing for _Birchcrest Park, Chowen Park and Countryside Park to recommended low bidder, Mid -Metro Construction at $34,553:80. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *AWARD OF BID FOR HEATED ASPHALT PATCH BOX Motion. made by Member Hovland and seconded by Member Faust for award of bid for heated asphalt patch box to recommended second bidder, Stepp Manufacturing at $45,950.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *AWARD OF BID FOR SAND, ROCK, BITUMINOUS MATERIALS, CONCRETE AND ENGINE OIL Motion made by Member Hovland and seconded by Member Faust for award of bid for sand, rock, bituminous materials, concrete, propane and engine oil to recommended low bidders as follows: Concrete Sand (delivered) to Fisher Aggregate, Inc. at $3.85 per ton; Course Sand (delivered) to Fisher Aggregate, Inc., at $4.60 per ton; Buck Shot (delivered) to Prior Lake Aggregate at $10.75 per ton; C1.2 Limestone (delivered) to CAMAS, Inc., at $6.44 per ton; C1.5 Limestone to CAMAS, Inc., at $6.07 per ton; Seal Coat Chips (delivered) to Midwest Asphalt at $15.20 per ton; Asphalt 2331 (picked up at plant) to C.S. McCrossan* (vendor 1) at $16.40 per ton, or to Bituminous Roadways (vendor 2) at $17.75 per ton; Asphal 2331 (delivered) to Bituminous Roadways at $20.75 per ton; 2331 Fine Asphalt Wear (picked up at plant) to Bituminous Roadways* (vendor 1) at $18.50 per ton or C. S. McCrossan (vendor -2) -at $18.39 per ton; 2331 -fine Asphalt Wear (delivered) to Bituminous Roadways at $21.50 per ton; 2331 4113/4213 Asphalt Wear (picked up) to C.S. McCrossan* (vendor 1) at $17.20 or Bituminous Roadways (vendor 2) at $18.00; 2331 411314213 Asphalt Wear (delivered) to Bituminous Roadways at $21.00; 2331 Find 318 Patch Mix Asphalt Wear (picked up) to C.S. McCrossan* (vendor 1) at $17.00 or Bituminous Roadways (vendor 2) at $18.50 per ton; 2331 Find 3/8 Patch Mix Asphalt Wear (delivered) to Bituminous Roadways at $21.50 per ton; Concrete 1 -3 yards (delivered) to CAMAS, Inc.. at $61.48 per cubic yard, plus small load charge; Concrete 3+ Yards (delivered) to CAMAS, Inc., at $61.48 per cubic yard; Emulsified Asphalt CRS2 to Ashland at $0.5334 per gallon; Emulsified Tack Oil to Richards Asphalt at $0.6400 per gallon; Engine Oil 15/40 to Hallman 0il at $2.89 per gallon; Engine Oil 40W to Hallman Oil at $3.49 per gallon; Engine Oil 5W/30 to Hallman Oil at $2.89 per gallon; Engine Oil Hyd. Tellus T46 to Hallman Oil at $3.39 per gallon; Engine O11 ATF -Donox TG to Hallman Oil at $2.99 per gallon; Engine Oil 15W40 to Hallman Oil at $15.00 per gallon; Rubberized Crack Filler to Construction Materials at $0.295 per gallon; Red Ball Aggregate to Byran Rock at $10.72 per ton; Cut Back Asphalt RC (delivered) to Koch Refinery** at $0.9404 per gallon; Propane LP to Suburban Propane ** at $33.98 per cylinder; Winter Mix Asphalt to Bituminous Roadways ** at $41.50 per ton ( *these bids are awarded on basis of total cost per ton including trucking and labor) (* *bids rejected). Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *AWARD OF BID FOR RANGE GOLF BALLS FOR BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE Motion made by Member Hovland and seconded by Member Faust for award of bid for range golf balls for Braemar Golf Course to recommended low bidder, Spalding Sports Worldwide at $23,280.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. BID AWARDED FOR WATER TREATMENT CHEMICALS FOR CITY WELLS AND SWIMMING POOLS Mayor Smith asked removal of the water treatment chemicals for City wells and swimming pools from the consent agenda and inquired if there is any difference in chemicals between suppliers, e.g. smell of the water. Engineer Hoffman commented_ he believes there is no difference in chemicals between suppliers. Member Kelly made a motion for award of bid for water treatment chemicals for City wells and swimming pools for hydrofluosilic acid and liquid chlorine to recommended low bidder, Hawkins Chemical at $49.47 per CWT and for caustic soda to recommended low bidder, Hawkins Chemical at $20.00 per CWT. Member Hovland seconded the motion. Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Smith Motion carried. - *3.2 BEER LICENSE RENEWALS APPROVED Motion made by Member Hovland and seconded by Member Faust approving 3.2 beer license renewals for Szechuan Star Restaurant and New Hong Kong, Inc. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. RESOLUTION ADOPTED ORDERING IMPROVEMENTS, ACCEPTING FEASIBILITY REPORTS. AND SETTING HEARING DATE OF MAY 5. 1997, FOR 1) NORMANDALE CHURCH STORM SEWER AND 2) DEWEY HILL SIDEWALK Engineer Hoffman noted a petition was received for a sidewalk on the south side of Dewey Hill Road from Cahill Road to Delaney Boulevard. Estimated cost of the improvement is $32,343.75 and funding would be from state aid funds: The proposed improvement has been reviewed and considered feasible. Staff suggested a hearing date be set for May 5, 1997. A petition has also been received from Normandale Lutheran Church requesting a storm sewer extension on Wilryan from the church parking lot to W. 62nd Street. The estimated cost of the improvement would be $36,200.00, funded through special assessment and the stormwater utility. The proposed improvement has been reviewed and considered feasible. Staff suggested a hearing date be set for May 5, 1997. Member Faust introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION RECEIVING REPORTS AND CALLING HEARING ON IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, feasibility reports have been prepared by the City Engineer with reference to the improvements known as the Normandale Church Storm Sewer Improvement No. STS - 246 and Dewey Hill Sidewalk Improvement No. S -54 and received by the City Council on April 7, 1997, and WHEREAS, the improvements are found to be feasible and necessary. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA, MINNESOTA: 1. The Council will consider the aforementioned improvements in accordance with the reports•and.the assessment of abutting property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statues, Chapter 429 at an estimated cost of the improvement: a) Normandale Storm Sewer estimated at $36,200, and b) Dewey Hill Sidewalk estimated at $32,343.73 2. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvements on the 5" day of May, 1997, in the council chamber of the city hall at 7:00 p.m. and the clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvement as required bylaw. Member Hovland seconded the motion. Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Smith Motion carried. RESOLUTION APPROVED FOR WEST 78TH STREET AND CAHILL SIGNALIZATION AND STREET IMPROVEMENT PLANS Engineer Hoffman explained as part of the overall improvement of the City transportation infrastructure, staff recommends signalization of West 78th St. and Cahill Road. After review of traffic accidents along West 78th in the Cahill Road vicinity, staff recommends adding a center lane for left turns onto Cahill, Cecilia, and south driveways in between Cahill and Cecilia. Traffic signal warrants are met for signalizing the intersection, therefore qualifying the project for state -aid funding. The estimated project cost is $385,000 including engineering and interconnection to the ICTM signal systems to the east. The Integrated Corridor Traffic Management System (ICTM) is a series of interconnected traffic signal systems running from 34th Avenue on the east in Bloomington to East Bush Lake Road -in Edina. These systems are all interconnected and operated by a sub - regional computer controlled system during peak traffic hours. Engineer Hoffman added the proposed project is listed within the Corridor Report completed by SRF. Staff recommends approval of the project, using state aid funding. Member Hovland introduced the following resolution and moved its .approval RESOLUTION ORDERING STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -314 . RECONSTRUCTION OF WEST 78"' STREET FROM RAILROAD BRIDGE TO CECILIA CIRCLE AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT CAHILL ROAD WHEREAS, the City Engineer has prepared plans and specifications for the improvement reconstructing West 78th Street between the railroad bridge and Cecilia Circle and Sherwood Avenue, and signalizing the intersection of West 781h Street and Cahill Road and has presented such plans and specifications to the City Council for approval; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Edina that it has duly considered the views of all persons - interested, and being fully advised of the pertinent facts does hereby determine to proceed with the construction of said improvement, including all proceedings which -may be necessary in eminent domain for the acquisition of necessary easements and rights for construction- and maintenance of such improvement. Said improvement is hereby designated and shall be referred to in all subsequent proceedings as: IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. BA -314 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Improvement BA -314 is hereby ordered as proposed. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that plans and specifications, a copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk are hereby approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. Member Kelly seconded the motion. Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Smith Resolution adopted. RESOLUTION APPROVED AUTHORIZING IMPROVEMENT PROJECT A -181 AND A -182 - MILL AND OVERLAY OF EXISTING STATE AID ' STREETS Engineer Hoffman explained staff recommends milling and ,overlaying of the following streets: West 70th Street from Amundson to Metro at $105,300.00; West 701h Street - France to Xerxes $167,200.00; Cahill Road - West 701h to West 78th Street $125,800.00; and Gleason Road - Valley View to Dewey Hill $120,600.00. All streets_ are deemed not needing. reconstruction but a major renovation such as "milling and overlaying ". The procedure is the removal of the top two or three inches of asphalt followed by paving with new asphalt. The improvements are listed under Improvement No. A -181. Engineer Hoffman noted the last project is a Richfield mill and overlay project on West 76th .Street. The project is identified as Improvement A -182. The City would pay the portion of the project entering Edina for approximately 280 feet. The project cost would be $19,980.00 and would be eligible for state -aid funding. Staff recommended that all five projects be funded through state -aid gas tax funds. Estimated cost is $538,880.00. Member Kelly introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION ORDERING STREET IMPROVEMENTS NOS. A -181 AND A -182 REMILL AND OVERLAY PORTIONS OF W. 70TH ST, CAHILL ROAD, GLEASON ROAD, AND W. 76TH ST. WHEREAS, the City Engineer has prepared plans and specifications for milling and overlaying of the following streets: West 701h Street - Amundson to Metro; West 70t' Street - France to Xerxes; Cahill Road - West 701h to West 78`h Street; Gleason Road - Valley View to Dewey Hill; and West 76'h (280' located in Edina). and has presented such plans and specifications to the City Council for approval; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the, City of Edina that it has duly considered the views of all persons interested, and being fully advised of the pertinent facts does hereby determine to proceed with the construction of said improvement, including all proceedings which may be necessary in eminent domain for the acquisition of necessary easements and rights for construction and maintenance of such improvement. Said improvement is hereby designated and shall be referred to in all subsequent proceedings as: IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NOS. A -181 and A -182 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Improvements A -181 and A -182 are hereby ordered as proposed. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that plans and specifications, a copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk are hereby approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. Member Faust seconded the motion Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Smith Resolution approved. APPOINTMENT MADE TO RECYCLING AND SOLID WASTE COMMISSION: VACANCIES REMAIN ON RECYCLING AND SOLID WASTE COMMISSION AND ART CENTER COMMITTEE Mayor Smith recommended appointment of Anne Cronin to the Recycling and Solid Waste Commission for a two year term to February 1, 1999. He asked that names of interested persons be submitted to him for consideration in filling the vacancies on the Recycling and Solid Waste Commission and the Art Center Committee. Member Faust made a motion appointing Anne Cronin to fill the vacancy on the Recycling and Solid Waste Commission. Member Kelly seconded the motion. Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Smith Motion carried. UPDATE OF CITY PURCHASING POLICIES APPROVED Finance Director Wallin reminded Council at one of their Saturday Planning Sessions, current purchasing policies were reviewed and changes introduced to the City's purchasing policies. Recommended changes were as follows: 1. Change the dollar threshold at which written purchase orders are required from $500 to $1,000 2. Change the dollar threshold at which Council approval is required from $5,000 to $15,000 3. Change the dollar threshold at which sealed bid procedures are required from $15,000 to $20,000 Rationale for the changes are: • All purchases are originally approved under the City's budget process. Purchasing procedures are secondary to the Council's approval of the budgetary requests of each department. • Recommended thresholds are significantly stricter than the statutory requirements. City purchasing requirements are listed in M.S.§ 471.345 under the Uniform Municipal Contracting Law. The table below reflects the statutory requirements, current pricing policies and the proposed changes: • uurrent sonar inresnoias ao not reriect ine change in prices of products over time. The current dollar thresholds were last changed in 1983. • The Finance Department processed over 7,000 purchase orders in 1996. State Statute Current City Policy Proposed Changes Written PO Req.w /Alternate Quotes $10,000 $500 $1,000 Council Approval Required $25,000 $5,000 $15,000 Sealed Bid Process Required $25,000 $15.,000 $20,000 • uurrent sonar inresnoias ao not reriect ine change in prices of products over time. The current dollar thresholds were last changed in 1983. • The Finance Department processed over 7,000 purchase orders in 1996. • Under the proposed changes, Edina is still stricter than its neighboring cities. (See table below) Member Kelly made a motion approving the recommended changes to the City of Edina Purchasing Policies as presented. Mayor Smith seconded the motion. Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Smith Motion carried. D.A.R.E. GRADUATION DATES/TIMES ANNOUNCED Chief Bernhjelm informed Council the Police Department will graduate more than 600, 5t' grade students from eight Edina elementary schools in April and May through the Drug Abuse Resistance Education (DARE) program. The DARE program focus is on building skills in our youth that are vital to their remaining drug and alcohol free. During the 17 week program, uniformed, trained Edina police officers help students in classes dealing with consequences, risks, assertiveness, media influences, self - esteem, and drug use and misuse. Chief Bernhjelm encouraged Council Members to attend these ceremonies adding positive influence and support to the DARE program. *PETITION RECEIVED FOR STORM SEWER REQUEST REFERRED TO ENGINEERING FOR FEASIBILITY Motion made by Member Hovland and seconded to Member Faust to refer the petition received from Karl Schmidt, 8 Bridge Lane for storm sewer request to the Engineering Department for processing as to feasibility. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. RESOLUTION APPROVED FOR CONSENT TO TRANSFER AND ASSIGNMENT OF HOUSING DEVELOPMENT REFUNDING REVENUE BONDS FOR EDINA PARK PLAZA Assistant Manager Hughes explained the Edina Park Plaza is a 202 unit senior citizen residence that is part of Edinborough. The property owner, Edina Park Plaza Associates Limited Partnership, is selling the development to the Brookdale Living Communities of Minnesota. The anticipated closing date is April 9,1997. The development was constructed via Housing Revenue Bonds issued by the City in 1986, and was refunded and reissued in 1989. In connection with the sale of the development, the parties are requesting that the City consent to the assignment of the various obligations with respect to the Housing Revenue Bonds to the purchaser of the property. Staff recommends the City consent to the assignment. Correspondence was received in support of the consent to the Assignment from Daniel V. Epstein, Vice President of Edina Park Plaza Associates Limited Partnership and from James T. Buchholz, Attorney at Law, representing Edina Park Plaza Limited Partnership, an Illinois partnership. RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council, at their April 7, 1997, approved the Consent to Transfer and Assignment of Housing Development Refunding Revenue Bonds for the Edina Park Plaza, as on file in the office of the City Clerk. and EDINA BLOOMINGTON EDEN ST. LOUIS PROPOSED PRAIRIE PARK Written PO Req with Alternate Quotes $1,000 $3,000 $2,000 $10,000 Council Approval $15,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 Required Sealed Bid Process Req $20,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 Member Kelly made a motion approving the recommended changes to the City of Edina Purchasing Policies as presented. Mayor Smith seconded the motion. Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Smith Motion carried. D.A.R.E. GRADUATION DATES/TIMES ANNOUNCED Chief Bernhjelm informed Council the Police Department will graduate more than 600, 5t' grade students from eight Edina elementary schools in April and May through the Drug Abuse Resistance Education (DARE) program. The DARE program focus is on building skills in our youth that are vital to their remaining drug and alcohol free. During the 17 week program, uniformed, trained Edina police officers help students in classes dealing with consequences, risks, assertiveness, media influences, self - esteem, and drug use and misuse. Chief Bernhjelm encouraged Council Members to attend these ceremonies adding positive influence and support to the DARE program. *PETITION RECEIVED FOR STORM SEWER REQUEST REFERRED TO ENGINEERING FOR FEASIBILITY Motion made by Member Hovland and seconded to Member Faust to refer the petition received from Karl Schmidt, 8 Bridge Lane for storm sewer request to the Engineering Department for processing as to feasibility. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. RESOLUTION APPROVED FOR CONSENT TO TRANSFER AND ASSIGNMENT OF HOUSING DEVELOPMENT REFUNDING REVENUE BONDS FOR EDINA PARK PLAZA Assistant Manager Hughes explained the Edina Park Plaza is a 202 unit senior citizen residence that is part of Edinborough. The property owner, Edina Park Plaza Associates Limited Partnership, is selling the development to the Brookdale Living Communities of Minnesota. The anticipated closing date is April 9,1997. The development was constructed via Housing Revenue Bonds issued by the City in 1986, and was refunded and reissued in 1989. In connection with the sale of the development, the parties are requesting that the City consent to the assignment of the various obligations with respect to the Housing Revenue Bonds to the purchaser of the property. Staff recommends the City consent to the assignment. Correspondence was received in support of the consent to the Assignment from Daniel V. Epstein, Vice President of Edina Park Plaza Associates Limited Partnership and from James T. Buchholz, Attorney at Law, representing Edina Park Plaza Limited Partnership, an Illinois partnership. RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council, at their April 7, 1997, approved the Consent to Transfer and Assignment of Housing Development Refunding Revenue Bonds for the Edina Park Plaza, as on file in the office of the City Clerk. and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Edina authorizes execution of said Consent. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Smith .Resolution approved. RESOLUTION APPROVED AUTHORIZING . SALE OF GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT FINANCING BONDS (SERIES 19978) Assistant Manager Hughes noted seven sealed bids for the General Obligation Tax Increment Financing Bonds (Series 1997B) were opened April 7, 1997, and were included in the Official Statement circulated by the City's financial advisor on behalf of the City. Brenda Krueger of Springsted, Inc., explained. Cronin & Company,. Incorporated, Smith Barney was the high bidder at $5,056,474.20 and recommended Cronin be awarded the bid. The bids were as follows: NET TRUE INTEREST INTEREST INTEREST BIDDE RATE PRICE COST RATE CRONIN & CO.,INC 4.50% 1999 $5,056,474.20 $2,949,436.63 5.3368% SMITH BARNEY 4.65%2000 4.75% 2001 4'.80%2002 4.85%2003 4.95%2004 5.05% 2005 5.10% 2006 5.15% 2007 5.20%2008 5.30% 2009 -2010 5.35% 2011 5.40%2012 5.50%2013 PIPER JAFFRAY 4.50% 1999 $5,057,337.47 $2,956,570.45 5.3483% 4.65 % 2000 4.75% 2001 4.80%2002 4.85% 2003 4.95% 2004 5.05%2005 5.10%2006 5.15%2007 5.20%2008 5.25% 2009 5.35% 2010 5.40%2011 5.45%2012 5.50%2013 DAIN BOSWORTH 5.00% 1999 -2004 $5,037,814.35 $2,959,934.61 5.3726 % 5.05%2005 5.10% 2006 -2007 5.20% 2008 5.25%2009 5.30% 2010 5.35%2011 5.375 %2012 5.40% 2013 FBS Investment 4.40% 1999 $5,044,960.00 $2,982,193.33 5.400% Services, Inc. 4.50%2000 Norw,est Investment 4.60% 2001 Services, Inc. 4.70% 2002 Dougherty Dawkins 4.80% 2003 Inc. 4.90%2004 Juran & Moody, A 5.00% 2005 Division of Miller, 5.10%2006 Johnson & Kuehn 5.20%2007. Inc. 5.25%2008 John C. Kinnard 8, 5.30%2009 Co. Inc. 5.40%2010 5.45%2011 5.50% 2012 -2013 GRIFFIN, KUBIK, 4.80% 1999 $5,034,010.00 $2,992,482.08 5.4308% STEPHENS, & 4.90% 2000 -2001 THOMPSON INC. 5.00% 2002 -2004 5.10% 2005 -2007 5.20%2008 5.25%2009 5.40% 2010 -2011 5.50% 2012 -2013 WILLIAM R. HOUGH 5.20% 1999 -2003 $5,034,010.00 $2,996,744.58 5.4491% & CO. 5.30% 2004 -2011 NIKE SECURITIES, 5.375 %2012 -2013 JC BRADFORD' & CO. BETZOLD,BERG & NUSSBAUM & CO. DEAN WITTER 4.85% 1999 -2003 $5,034,010.00 $3,004,123_ .75 5.4511% REYNOLDS INC. 4.95%2004 ABN AMRO 5.05%2005 CHICAGO CORP. 5.15%2006 PRUDENTIAL 5.25% 2007 -2008 SECURITIES, INC., 5.30% 2009 OPPENHEIMER & 5.40% 2010 CO., INC. 5.45% 2011 PAINEWEBBER INC.5.50% 2012 -2013 Member Hovland introduced the following resolution and moved its approval: RESOLUTION RELATING TO $5,090,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT BONDS, SERIES 199713; AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE, AWARDING THE SALE, FIXING THE FORM AND DETAILS, AND PROVIDING FOR THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY THEREOF AND THE SECURITY THEREFOR BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the Council) of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City), as follows: Section 1. Authorization and Sale. 1.01. Authorization. The City has previously issued its General Obligation Temporary Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1997A (the "Temporary Bonds ") .pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.178, subdivision 5(a), to finance the costs of acquisition of property for a public park and ponding area and costs of construction of improvements to such property (the "Project "), which acquisition and improvement is to be undertaken by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the "HRA ") as a part of the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Project of the HRA. The Temporary Bond was purchased by the HRA. To refund the Temporary Bonds and pay costs of the Project the Council authorizes the issuance and sale by the City of its General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1997B (the Bonds), in the principal amount of $5,090,000 pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475 and Section 469.178. . 1.02. Sale of Bonds. The City has retained Springsted Incorporated, an independent financial advisor, to assist the City in connection ' with the sale of the Bonds. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.60, subdivision 2, paragraph (9), the requirements as to public sale do not apply to the issuance of the Bonds. Proposals have been received for the sale of the Bonds, and the Council has publicly considered all proposals presented in conformity with the terms and conditions distributed by the City to potential purchasers of the. Bonds. The most favorable of such proposals is ascertained to be that of Cronin & Company, Incorporated Smith Barney and associates, (the Purchaser), to purchase the. Bonds at a price of $5,056,474.20 plus accrued interest on all Bonds to the day of delivery and payment, on the further terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. 1.03 Award of Bonds. The sale of the Bonds is hereby awarded to the Purchaser and the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed on behalf of the City to execute a contract for the sale of the Bonds in accordance with the terms of the bid. The good faith deposit of the Purchaser shall be retained and deposited by the City until the Bonds have been delivered and shall be deducted from the purchase price paid at settlement. The good faith checks of other persons who submitted proposals to purchase the Bonds shall be returned to them forthwith. 1.04. Issuance of Bonds. All acts, conditions and things which are required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to exist, to happen and to be performed precedent to and in the valid issuance of the Bonds having been done, existing, having happened and having been performed, it is now .necessary for the Council to establish the form and terms of the Bonds, to provide security therefor and to issue the Bonds forthwith. Section 2. Form of Bonds. The Bonds shall be prepared in substantially the following form: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA GENERAL OBLIGATION TAX INCREMENT BOND, SERIES 1997B Date of Rate Maturity Original Issue CUSIP April 1, 1997 REGISTERED OWNER: PRINCIPAL AMOUNT: DOLLARS THE CITY OF EDINA, Hennepin County, Minnesota (the "City "), acknowledges itself to be indebted and, for value received, hereby promises to pay. to the registered owner above named, the principal amount indicated above, on the maturity date specified above, with interest thereon from the date hereof at the annual rate specified above computed on the basis of the number of days elapsed in a 360 -day year consisting of twelve 30 -day months, payable on February 1 and August 1 in each year, commencing February 1, 1998, to the person in ,whose name this Bond is registered at the close of business on the 15th day (whether or not a business day) of the immediately preceding month, all subject to the provisions referred .to herein with respect to the redemption of the principal of this Bond before maturity. The interest hereon and, upon presentation and surrender hereof at the office of the Finance Director in Edina, Minnesota, as Registrar, Transfer Agent and Paying Agent (the "Bond Registrar "), or its successor designated under the Resolution described herein, the principal hereof, are payable in lawful money of the United States of America by check or draft, of the City or the Bond Registrar if a successor to the City Finance Director as Bond Registrar-has been designated under the Resolution described herein. This Bond is one of an issue in the aggregate principal amount of$5,090,000 (the "Bonds "), all of like date and tenor except as to serial number, interest rate, redemption privilege and maturity date, issued pursuant to a resolution adopted by the City Council on April 7, 1997 (the "Resolution ") to refund certain of the City's outstanding temporary tax increment bonds, and is issued pursuant to and in full conformity with the provisions of the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota thereunto enabling, including Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.178 and Chapter 475. The Bonds are payable primarily from tax increments to be derived from a tax increment financing district established by the City and from tax increment financing districts established by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Edina (the "Districts ") which have been pledged to the payment of the Bonds by the Resolution. In addition, for the full and prompt payment of the principal and interest on the Bonds as the same become due, the full faith, credit and taxing power of the City have not been and are irrevocably pledged. The Bonds are issuable only as fully registered bonds, in denominations of $5,000 or any integral multiple thereof, of single maturities. Bonds maturing in the years 1999 through 2006 are payable on their respective stated maturity dates without option of prior payment, but Bonds having stated maturity dates in the years 2007 through 2013 are each subject to redemption and prepayment, at the option of the City and in whole or in part and if in part, in the maturities selected by the City and by lot, assigned in proportion to their principal amount, within any maturity, on February 1, 2006 and on any date thereafter, at a price equal to the principal amount thereof to be redeemed plus interest accrued to the date of redemption. At least thirty days prior to the date set for redemption of any Bond, notice of the call for redemption will be mailed to the Bond Registrar and to the registered owner of each Bond to be redeemed at his address appearing in the Bond Register, but no defect in or failure to give such mailed notice of redemption shall affect the validity of proceedings for the redemption of any Bond, not affected by such defect or failure. Official notice of redemption having been given as aforesaid, the Bonds or portions of Bonds so to be redeemed shall, on the redemption date, become due and payable at the redemption price herein specified and from and after such date (unless the City shall default in the payment of the redemption price) such Bond or portions of Bonds shall cease to bear interest. Upon the partial redemption of any Bond, a new Bond or Bonds will be delivered to the registered owner without charge, representing the remaining principal amount outstanding. The Bonds have been designated by the City as "qualified tax - exempt obligations" pursuant to Section 265(b) of the Internal Revenue Code, a amended. As provided in the Resolution and subject to certain limitations set forth therein, this Bond is transferable upon the books of the City at the principal office of the Bond Registrar, by the registered owner hereof in person or by his attorney duly authorized in writing upon surrender hereof together with a written instrument of transfer satisfactory to the Bond Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner or his attorney; and may also be surrendered in exchange for Bonds of other authorized denominations. Upon such transferor exchange, the City will cause a new Bond or Bonds to be issued in the name of the transferee or registered owner, of the same aggregate principal amount, bearing interest at the same rate and maturing on the same date, subject to reimbursement for any tax, fee or governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer or exchange. .The City and the Bond Registrar may deem and treat the person in whose name _this Bond is-registered as the absolute owner hereof, whether this Bond is overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment and for all other purposes, and neither the City nor the Bond Registrar shall be affected by any notice to the contrary.. IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED, RECITED, COVENANTED AND AGREED that all acts, conditions and things required by the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota to be done, to exist, to happen and to be performed precedent to and in the issuance of this Bond in order to make it a valid and binding general obligation of the City according to its terms have been done, do exist, have happened and have been performed as so required; that prior to the issuance hereof the City has pledged and appropriated to a sinking fund established for the payment of the Bonds tax increments to be derived by the City from the Districts; that, if necessary for the payment of principal and interest on the Bonds, ad valorem taxes are required to be levied upon all taxable property in the City, which levy is not limited as to rate or amount; and that the issuance of this Bond does not cause the indebtedness of the City to exceed any. constitutional or statutory limitation. This Bond shall not be valid or become obligatory for any purpose or be entitled to any security or benefit under -the Resolution until the Certificate of Authentication hereon shall have been executed by the Bond Registrar by manual signature of the Bond Registrar, or in the event the City Finance Director is no longer acting as Bond Registrar, by one of the authorized representatives of the Bond Registrar. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City of Edina, • Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, by its City Council, has caused this Bond to be executed by the signatures of the Mayor and the City Manager and has caused this Bond to be dated as of the date set forth below. Date of Authentication: CITY OF EDINA within. City Manager CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICATION Mayor This is one of the Bonds delivered pursuant to the Resolution mentioned By- City Finance Director, as Bond Registrar The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this Bond, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to the applicable laws or regulations: TEN COM -- as tenants in common TEN ENT -- as tenants by the entireties UNIF TRANS MIN ACT .......... Custodian .......... (Cult) (Minor) under Uniform Transfers to JT TEN -- as joint tenants Minors with right of survivorship and Act .................... ............................... not as tenants in (State) common Additional abbreviations may also be used. ASSIGNMENT. FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned hereby sells, assigns -and transfers unto the within Bond and all rights thereunder, and hereby irrevocably constitutes and appoints attorney to transfer the within Bond on the books kept for registration thereof, with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated: PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE: Signature(s) must be guaranteed by an "eligible guarantor institution" meeting the requirements of the Bond Registrar, which requirements include membership or participation in the Securities Transfer Association Medallion Program (STAMP) or such other "signature guaranty program" as may be determined by the Bond Registrar in , addition to or in substitution for STAMP, all in accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. NOTICE: The signature to-this assignment must correspond with the name as it appears upon the face of the within Bond in every particular, without alternation or any change whatsoever. Section 3. Bond Terms. Execution and Delive 3.01. Maturities. Interest Rates Denominations Payment. The City shall forthwith issue and deliver the Bonds, which shall be denominated "General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 199713". The Bonds shall be in the aggregate principal amount of $5,090,000 and shall be issuable in the denomination of $5,000 each or any integral multiple thereof, shall mature on February1 in the years and amounts set forth below, and Bonds maturing in such years and amounts shall bear interest computed on the, basis of the number of days elapsed in .a 360 -day year consisting of twelve 30 -days months from date of original issue until paid or duly called for redemption at the rates per annum shown opposite such years and amounts as follows: Year Amount Rate Year Amoun t Rate 1999 $100,000 % 2007 $425,000 % 2000 125,000 2008 445,000 2001 150,000 2009 465,000 2002 175,000 2010 490,000 2003 200,000 2011 515,000 2004 225,000 2012 545,000 2005 250,000 2013 575,000 2006 405,000 The Bonds shall be issuable only in fully registered form. The interest thereon and, upon surrender of each Bond, the principal amount thereof, shall be payable by check or draft issued by the Registrar described herein. 3.02. Dates: Interest Payment Dates. Each Bond shall bear a date of original issue of April 1, 1997, and shall be dated as of the date of authentication. Interest on the Bonds shall be payable on February 1 and August 1 in each year, commencing February 1, 1998, to the owner of record thereof as of the close of business on the fifteenth day of the immediately preceding month, whether or not such day is a business day. 3.03. Registration. The City shall appoint, and shall maintain, a bond registrar, transfer agent and paying agent (the Registrar). The effect of registration and the rights and duties of the City and the Registrar with respect thereto shall be as follows: (a) Re is er. The Registrar shall keep at its principal corporate trust office a bond register in which the Registrar shall provide for the registration of ownership of Bonds and the registration of transfers and exchanges of Bonds entitled to be registered, transferred or exchanged. (b) Transfer of Bonds. Upon surrender for transfer of any Bond duly endorsed by the registered owner thereof or accompanied by a written instrument of transfer, in form satisfactory to the Registrar, duly executed by the registered owner thereof or by an attorney duly authorized by the registered owner in writing, the Registrar shall authenticate and deliver, in the name of the designated transferee or transferees, one or more new Bonds of a like aggregate principal amount and maturity, as requested by the transferor. The Registrar may, however, close the books for registration of any transfer after the fifteenth day of the month preceding each interest payment date-and until such interest payment date. (c) Exchange of Bonds. Whenever any Bond is surrendered by the registered owner for exchange, the Registrar shall authenticate and deliver one or more new Bonds of a like aggregate principal amount and maturity, as requested. by the registered owner or the owner's attorney duly authorized in writing. (d) Cancellation. All Bonds surrendered upon any transfer or exchange shall be promptly canceled by the Registrar and thereafter disposed of as directed by the City. (e) Improper or Unauthorized Transfer. When any Bond is presented to the Registrar for transfer, the Registrar may refuse to transfer the same until it is satisfied that the endorsement on such Bond or separate instrument of transfer is legally authorized. The Registrar shall incur no liability for its refusal,, in good faith, to make transfers which it, in its judgment, deems improper or unauthorized. (f) Persons Deemed Owners. The City and the Registrar may treat the person in whose name any Bond is at any time registered in the bond register as the absolute owner of such Bond, whether such Bond shall be overdue or not, for the purpose of receiving payment of, or on account of, the principal of and interest on such Bond and for all other purposes, and all such payments so made to any such registered owner or upon the owner's order shall be valid and effectual to satisfy and discharge the liability of the City upon such Bond to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. (g) Taxes. Fees and Charges. For every transfer or exchange of Bonds (except for an exchange upon a partial redemption of a Bond), the Registrar may impose a charge upon the owner thereof sufficient to reimburse the Registrar for any tax, fee or other governmental charge required to be paid with respect to such transfer or exchange. (h) Mutilated. Lost, Stolen or Destroyed Bonds. In case any Bond shall become mutilated or be lost, stolen or destroyed, the Registrar shall deliver a new Bond of like amount, number, maturity date and tenor in exchange and substitution for and upon cancellation of any such mutilated Bond or in lieu of and in substitution for any such Bond lost, stolen or destroyed, upon the payment of the reasonable expenses and charges of the Registrar in connection therewith; and, in the case of a Bond lost, stolen or destroyed, upon filing with the Registrar of evidence satisfactory to it that such Bond was lost, stolen or destroyed, and of the ownership thereof, and upon furnishing to the Registrar of an appropriate bond or indemnity in form, substance. and amount satisfactory to it, in which both the City and the Registrar shall be named as obligees. All Bonds so surrendered to the Registrar shall be canceled by it and evidence of such cancellation shall be given to the City. If the mutilated, lost, stolen or destroyed Bond has already matured or been called for redemption in accordance with its terms, it shall not be necessary to issue a new Bond prior to payment. 3.04. Appointment of Initial Registrar. The City hereby appoints the City Finance Director, as the initial Registrar. In the event that the City determines to discontinue the book entry-only system for the Bonds as described in paragraph (c) of Section 3.07, or DTC, as defined in Section 3.07, determines to discontinue providing its services with respect to the Bonds and a new securities depository is not appointed for the Bonds, the City will designate a suitable bank or trust company to act as successor Registrar if the City Finance Director is then acting as Registrar. The City reserves the right to remove any Registrar upon thirty (30) days' notice and upon the appointment of a successor Registrar, in which event the predecessor Registrar shall deliver all cash and Bonds in its possession to the successor Registrar and shall deliver the bond register to the successor Registrar. 3.05. Redemption. Bonds maturing in the years 1999 through 2006 shall not be subject to redemption prior to maturity, but Bonds maturing in the years 2007 through 2013 shall each be subject to redemption and prepayment, at the option of the City, in whole or in part, and if in part, in the maturities selected by the City and, within any maturity, in $5,000 principal amounts selected by the Registrar by lot, on February 1, 2006 and on any date thereafter at a price equal to the principal amount thereof to be redeemed plus interest accrued to the date of redemption. At least thirty days prior to the date set for redemption of any Bond, the City Clerk shall cause notice of the call for redemption to be mailed to the Registrar and to the registered owner of each Bond to be redeemed, but no defect in or failure to give such mailed notice of redemption shall affect the validity of proceedings for the redemption of any Bond not affected by such defect or failure. The notice of redemption shall specify the redemption date, redemption price, the numbers, interest rates and CUSIP numbers of the Bonds to be redeemed and the place at which the Bonds are to be surrendered for payment, which is the principal office of the Registrar. Official notice of redemption having been given as aforesaid, the Bonds or portions thereof so to be redeemed shall, on the redemption date, become due and payable at the redemption price therein specified and from and after such date (unless the City shall .default in the payment of the redemption price) such Bonds or portions thereof shall cease to bear interest. In addition to the notice prescribed by the preceding paragraph, the City shall also give, or cause to be given, notice of the redemption of any Bond or Bonds or portions thereof at least -35 days before the redemption date by certified mail or telecopy to the Purchaser and all registered securities depositories then ; in the business of holding substantial amounts of obligations of the character of the Bonds (such depositories now being The Depository Trust Company, of Garden City, New York; and Philadelphia Depository Trust Company, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) and one or more national information services that disseminate information regarding municipal bond redemptions; provided that any defect in or any failure to' give any notice of redemption prescribed by this paragraph shall not affect the validity of the proceedings for the redemption of any Bond or portion thereof. - Bonds in a denomination larger than $5,000 may be redeemed in part in any integral multiple of $5,000. The owner of any Bond redeemed in part shall receive, upon surrender of such Bond to the Registrar, one or more. new Bonds of such same series in authorized denominations equal in principal amount to the unredeemed portion of the Bond so surrendered. 3.06. Preparation and Delivery. The Bonds shall be prepared under the direction of the City Finance Director and shall be executed on behalf of the City by the signatures of the Mayor and the City Manager. In case any officer whose signature shall appear on the Bonds shall cease to be such officer before the delivery of any Bond, such signature shall nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all. purposes, the same as if such officer had remained in office until delivery. Notwithstanding such execution, no Bond shall be valid or obligatory for any purpose or entitled to any security or benefit under this resolution unless and until a certificate of authentication on such Bond has been duly executed by the manual signature of the Registrar, or in the event the City Finance Director is no longer acting as Registrar, an authorized representative of the Registrar. Certificates of authentication on different Bonds need not be signed by the same representative. The executed certificate of authentication on each Bond shall be conclusive evidence that it has been authenticated and delivered under this resolution. When the Bonds have been so executed and authenticated, they shall be delivered by the City Finance Director to the Purchaser upon payment of the purchase price in accordance with the contract of sale heretofore made and executed, and the Purchaser shall not be obligated to see to the application of the purchase price. 3.07. Securities Depository. (a) For purposes of this Section the following terms shall have the following meanings: "Beneficial Owner" shall mean, whenever used with respect to a Bond, the person in whose name such Bond is recorded as the beneficial owner of such Bond by a Participant on the records of such Participant, or such person's subrogee. "Cede & Co." shall mean Cede & Co., the nominee of DTC, and any successor nominee of DTC with respect to the Bonds. "DTC" shall mean The Depository Trust Company of New York, NewYork. "Participant" shall mean any broker - dealer, bank or other financial institution for which DTC holds Bonds as securities'depository. "Representation Letter" shall mean the Representation Letter from the City to DTC with respect to the procedures of DTC presently on file with DTC. (b) The Bonds shall be initially issued as separately authenticated fully registered bonds, and one Bond shall be issued in the principal amount of each stated maturity of the Bonds. Upon initial issuance, the ownership of such Bonds shall be registered in the bond register in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC. The Registrar and the City may treat DTC (or its nominee) as the sole and exclusive owner of the Bonds registered in its name for the purposes of payment of the principal of or interest on the Bonds, selecting the Bonds or portions thereof to be redeemed, if any, giving any notice permitted or required to be given to registered owners of Bonds under this resolution, registering the transfer of Bonds, and for all other_ purposes whatsoever; and neither the Registrar nor the City shall be affected by any notice to the contrary. Neither the Registrar nor the City shall have any responsibility or obligation to any Participant, any person claiming a beneficial ownership interest in the Bonds under or through DTC or any Participant, or any other person which is not shown on the bond register as being a registered owner of any Bonds, with respect to the accuracy of any records maintained by DTC or any Participant, with respect to the payment by DTC or any. Participant of any amount with respect to the principal of or interest on the Bonds, with respect to any notice which is permitted or required to be given to owners of Bonds under this resolution, with respect.to the selection by, DTC or any Participant of any person to receive payment in the event of a partial redemption of the Bonds, or with respect to any consent given or other action taken by DTC as registered owner of the Bonds. So long as any Bond is registered in the name of Cede & Co., as nominee of DTC, the Registrar shall pay all principal of and interest on such Bond, and shall give all notices with respect to such Bond, only to Cede & Co. in accordance with the. Representation Letter, and all such payments shall be valid and effective .to fully satisfy and discharge the City's. obligations with respect to the principal of and interest on the Bonds to the extent of the sum or sums so paid. No person other than DTC shall receive an authenticated Bond for each separate stated maturity evidencing the obligation of the City to make payments of principal and interest. Upon delivery by DTC to the Registrar of written notice to the effect that DTC has determined to substitute a new nominee in place of Cede & Co., the Bonds will be transferable to such new nominee in accordance with paragraph (d) hereof. (c) In the event the City determines that it is in the best interest of the Beneficial Owners that they be able to obtain Bonds in the form of bond certificates, the City may notify DTC and the Registrar, whereupon DTC shall notify the Participants of the availability through DTC of Bonds in the form of certificates. In such event, the Bonds will be transferable in accordance with paragraph (e) hereof. DTC may determine to discontinue providing its services with respect to the Bonds at any time by giving notice to the City and the Registrar and discharging its responsibilities with respect thereto under applicable law. In such. event the Bonds will be transferable in accordance with paragraph (d) hereof. (d) In the event that any transfer or exchange of Bonds is permitted under paragraph (b) or (c) hereof, such transfer or exchange shall be accomplished upon receipt by the Registrar of the Bonds to be transferred or exchanged and appropriate instruments of transfer to the permitted transferee in accordance with the provisions of this resolution. In the event Bonds in the form of.certificates are issued to owners other than Cede & Co., its successor as nominee for DTC as owner of all the Bonds, or another securities depository as owner of all the Bonds, the provisions of this resolution shall also apply to all matters relating thereto, including, without limitation, the printing of such Bonds in the form of bond certificates and the method of payment of principal of and interest on such Bonds in the form of bond certificates. Section 4. Use of Proceeds and Security Provisions. Section 4.01. Use of Proceeds and Construction Fund. The proceeds of the Bonds in the amount of $5,000,000, are irrevocably appropriated to pay and .redeem the Temporary Bonds on the date of issuance of the Bonds. Any accrued interest on the Bonds .shall be deposited in the Sinking fund created pursuant to Section 4.02 hereof. There is hereby established on the official books and records of the City a Series 1997 B General Obligation Tax Increment Bond Construction Fund (the Construction Fund). To the Construction Fund there shall be credited all remaining proceeds. of the Bonds and all remaining proceeds of the Temporary Bonds on hand with the City. From the Construction Fund there shall be paid by the City or HRA all costs and expenses of the Project and the issuance of the Bonds. After payment of all costs of the Project, the Construction Fund shall be. discontinued and any Bond proceeds and other funds remaining therein shall be transferred to the Sinking Fund created pursuant to Section 4.02 hereof. Section 4.02. General Obligation Tax Increment Bond Sinking Fund. The Bonds shall be payable from- a separate Series 1997B General Obligation Tax Increment Bond Sinking Fund (the Sinking Fund) which shall be created and maintained on the books of the City as a separate debt redemption fund until the Bonds, and all interest thereon, are fully paid. There shall be credited to the Sinking Fund the following: (a) Any amount deposited therein pursuant to Section 4.01 hereof. (b) All taxes levied and all other money which may at any time be received for or appropriated to the payment of the principal of or interest on the Bonds, including the tax increments herein pledged and appropriated to the Sinking Fund and all collections of any ad valorem taxes levied for the payment of the Bonds. (c) Any other funds appropriated by the Council for the payment of the Bonds. There are hereby established two accounts in the Sinking Fund, designated as the "Debt Service Account" and the "Surplus Account." All money appropriated or to be deposited in the Bond Fund shall be deposited as received into the Debt Service Account. On each February 1, the City Finance Director shall determine the amount on hand in the Debt Service Account. If such amount is in excess of one - twelfth of the debt service payable from the Bond Fund in the immediately preceding 12 months, the City Finance Director shall promptly transfer the amount in excess to the Surplus Account. The City appropriates to the Surplus Account any amounts to be transferred thereto from the Debt Service Account as herein provided and all income derived from the investment of amounts on hand in the Surplus Account. If at any time the amount on hand in 'the Debt Service Account is insufficient to meet the requirements of the Bond Fund, the City Finance Director -shall transfer to the Debt Service Account amounts on hand in the Surplus Account to the extent necessary to cure such deficiency. 4.03. Tax Increment Financing District. The City hereby irrevocably pledges to the Sinking Fund tax increments derived from the tax increment financing districts of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina (the HRA), designated by Hennepin County as Nos. 1201 (Southeast Edina- Edinborough Tax Increment Financing District), 1203 (Centennial Lakes Tax Increment Financing District) and 1200 (50th and France Redevelopment Area) and tax increments derived from the tax increment financing district of the City designated by Hennepin County as No. 1204 (Southdale Tax Increment Financing District), which are either paid to the City (in the case of the tax increment financing district established by the City) or received by the City from the HRA to pay the Bonds (in the case of the tax increment financing districts established by the HRA). Such tax increments shall be deposited in the Sinking Fund in an amount sufficient to pay all principal and interest when due on the Bonds. Nothing herein shall preclude the City or the HRA from hereafter making further pledges and appropriations of the tax increments herein pledged for the payment of the Bonds for the payment of other obligations of the City or HRA or to pay costs eligible to be paid from the tax increments herein pledged. 4.04. Full Faith and Credit Pledged. The full faith and credit and taxing power of the City shall be and are hereby irrevocably pledged for the prompt and full payment of the principal of and interest on the Bonds. It is estimated that the tax increment from the Districts and other funds herein pledged for the payment of the Bonds will be collected in amounts not less than five percent in excess of the amounts needed to meet when due the principal of and interest on the Bonds and all other obligations of the City payable from tax increments from the Districts as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.61. Consequently, no ad valorem taxes are now levied to pay the Bonds or the interest to come due thereon, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.178, subdivision 2. 4.05. Additional Bonds. The City reserves the right to issue additional bonds payable from the Sinking Fund. Section 5. Defeasance. When all of the Bonds have been discharged as provided in this section, all pledges, covenants and other rights granted by this resolution to the holders of the Bonds shall cease. The City may discharge its obligations with respect to any Bonds which are due on any date by depositing with the paying agent on or before that date a sum sufficient for the-payment thereof in full; or, if any Bond should not be paid when due, it may nevertheless be discharged by depositing with the paying agent a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full with interest accrued to the date of such deposit. The City may also discharge its obligations with respect to any prepayable Bond called for redemption on any date when it is prepayable according to their terms, by depositing with the Registrar on or before that date a sum sufficient for the payment thereof in full; provided that notice of the redemption thereof has been duly given as provided in Section 3.05. The City may also at any time discharge its obligations with respect to any Bonds, subject to the provisions of, law now or hereafter authorizing and regulating such action, by depositing irrevocably in escrow, with a bank qualified by law as an escrow agent for this purpose, cash or securities which are general obligations of the United States or securities of United States agencies which are authorized by law to be so deposited, bearing interest payable at such time and at such rates and maturing on such dates as shall be. required, without reinvestment, to pay all principal and interest to become due thereon to maturity or, if notice of redemption as herein required has been duly provided for, to such earlier redemption date. Section 6. Registration. Certification of Proceedings. Investments of Moneys. Arbitrage and Official Statement. 6.01. Registration. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to file a certified copy of this resolution with the County Auditor of Hennepin County, together with such other information as he shall require, and to obtain from the County Auditor a certificate that the Bonds have been entered on upon the Auditor's register as required by law. 6.02. Certification of Proceedings. The officers of the City and the County Auditor of Hennepin County are hereby authorized and directed to prepare and furnish to the Purchaser, and to Dorsey & Whitney LLP, Bond Counsel, certified copies of all proceedings and records of the City, and such other affidavits, certificates and information as may be required to show the facts relating to the legality and marketability of the Bonds as the same appear from the books and records under their custody and control or as otherwise known to them, and all such certified copies, certificates and affidavits, including any heretofore furnished, shall be deemed representations of the City as to the facts recited therein. 6.03. Covenant. The City covenants and agrees with the holders from time to time of the Bonds that it will not take or permit to be taken by any of its officers, employees or agents any action which would cause the interest on the Bonds to become subject to taxation under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code), and Regulations promulgated thereunder (the Regulations), as such are enacted or promulgated and in effect on the date of issue of the Bonds, and covenants to take any and all actions within its powers to ensure that the interest on the Bonds will not become subject to taxation under such Code and Regulations. The Project to be financed with the Bonds will be owned and maintained by the City and available for use by members of the general public on a substantially equal basis. The City shall not enter into any lease, use or other agreement with any non - governmental person relating to the use of the Project or security for the payment of the Bonds which might cause the Bonds to be considered "private activity bonds" or "private loan bonds" within the meaning of Section 141 of the Code. 6.04. Arbitrage Rebate. The City acknowledges that the Bonds are subject to the rebate requirements of Section 148(f) of the Code. The City covenants and agrees to retain such records, make such determinations, file such reports and documents and pay such amounts at such times as are required under said Section 148(f) and 'applicable Regulations to preserve the exclusion of interest on the Bonds from gross income for federal income tax purposes, unless the Bonds qualify for the exception from the rebate requirement under Section 148(f)(4)(C) of the Code and no "gross proceeds" of the Bonds (other than amounts constituting a "bona fide debt service fund ") arise during or after the expenditure of the original proceeds thereof. In furtherance of the foregoing, the City Finance Director is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Rebate Certificate, in the form prescribed by Bond Counsel, and the City hereby covenants and agrees to observe and perform the covenants and agreements contained therein, unless amended or terminated in accordance with the provisions thereof. 6.05. Arbitrage Certification. The Mayor and City Manager, being the officers of the City charged with the responsibility for issuing the Bonds pursuant to this resolution, are authorized and directed to execute and deliver to the Purchaser ,a certificate in accordance with the provisions of Section 148 of the Code, and Section 1.148- 2(b)(2) of the Regulations, stating the facts and estimates in existence on the date of issue and delivery of the Bonds which make it reasonable to expect that the proceeds of the Bonds will not be used in a manner that would cause the Bonds to be arbitrage bonds within the meaning of said Code and Regulations. 6.06. Interest Disallowance. The City hereby designates the Bonds as "qualified tax — exempt obligations" for purpose of Section 265(b) of the Code relating to the disallowance of interest expenses for financial institutions. The City represents that in calendar year 1997 it does not reasonably expect to issue tax — exempt obligations which are not private activity bonds (not treating qualified 501(c)(3) bonds under Section 145 of the Code as private activity bonds for purposes of this representation) in an amount in excess of $10,000,000. 6.07. Official Statement. The Official Statement relating to the Bonds, dated March 24, 1997. (the Official Statement), prepared and distributed on behalf of the City by Springsted Incorporated, is hereby approved. Springsted Incorporated, is hereby authorized of behalf of the City to prepare and distribute to the Purchaser 'a supplement to the Official Statement listing the offering price, the interest rates, other information relating to the Bonds required to be included in the Official Statement by Rule 15c2 -12 adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Within seven business days from the date ,hereof, the City shall deliver to the Purchaser a reasonable number of copies of the Official Statement and such supplement. The officers of the City are hereby authorized and directed to execute such certificates as may be appropriate concerning the accuracy, completeness and sufficiency of the Official Statement. Section 7. Continuing Disclosure. (a) Purpose and Beneficiaries. To provide for the public availability of certain information relating to the Bonds and the security therefor and to permit the original purchaser and other participating underwriters in the primary offering of the Bonds to comply with amendments to Rule 15c2 -12 promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC ") under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17 C.F.R. § 240.15c2 -12), relating to continuing disclosure (as in effect and interpreted from time to time, the "Rule "), which will enhance the marketability of the Bonds, the City hereby makes the following covenants and agreements for the benefit of the Owners (as hereinafter defined) from time to time of the Outstanding Bonds (as hereinafter defined). The City is the only "obligated person" in respect of the Bonds within the meaning of the Rule for purposes of identifying the entities in respect of which continuing disclosure must be made. If the City fails to comply with any provisions of this Section 7, any person aggrieved thereby, including the Owners of any Outstanding Bonds, may take whatever action at law or in equity may appear necessary or appropriate to enforce performance and observance of any agreement or covenant contained in this Section 7, including an action for a writ of mandamus or specific performance. Direct, indirect, consequential and punitive damages shall not be recoverable for any default hereunder to the extent permitted by law. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, in no event shall a default under this Section 8 constitute a default under the Bonds or under any other provision of this resolution. As used in this Section 7, "Owner" or "Bondowner" means, in respect of a Bond, the registered owner or owners thereof appearing in the bond register maintained by the Registrar or any "Beneficial Owner" (as hereinafter defined) thereof, if such Beneficial Owner provides 'to the Registrar evidence of such beneficial ownership in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Registrar. As used herein, "Beneficial Owner" means, in respect of a Bond, any person or entity which (i) has the power, directly or indirectly, to vote or consent with respect to, or to dispose of ownership of, such Bond (including persons or entities holding Bonds through nominees, depositories or other intermediaries), or (b) is treated as the owner of the Bond for federal income tax purposes. As used herein, "Outstanding " means when used with reference to Bonds means all Bonds which have been issued and authenticated by the Registrar except (i) Bonds which have been paid in full (ii) Bonds which have been canceled by the Registrar or surrendered to the Registrar for cancellation and (iii) Bonds which have been discharged as provided in Section 5 hereof. (b) Information To Be Disclosed. The City will provide, in the manner set forth in subsection (c) hereof, either directly or indirectly through an agent designated by the City, the following information at the following times: (1) on or before 365. days after the end of each fiscal year of the City, commencing with the fiscal year ending December 31, 1997 the following financial information and operating data in respect of the City (the "Disclosure Information "): (A) the audited financial statements of the City for such fiscal year, prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles promulgated by the Financial Accounting Standards Board as modified in accordance with the - governmental accounting standards promulgated by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board or as otherwise provided under Minnesota law, as in effect from time to time, or, if and to the extent such financial statements have not been prepared in. accordance with such generally accepted accounting principles for reasons beyond the reasonable control of the City, noting the discrepancies therefrom and the effect thereof, and certified as to accuracy and completeness in all material respects by the fiscal officer of the City; and (B) To the extent not included. in the financial statements referred to in paragraph (A) hereof, the information for such fiscal year or for the period most recently available of the type set forth below, which information may be unaudited, but is to be certified as to accuracy and completeness in all material respects by the fiscal officer of the City, to the best of his or her knowledge, which certification may be based on the reliability of information obtained from governmental or other third party sources: Most recent population estimate; City Property Values; City Indebtedness; City Tax Rates; Levies and Collections; and Current General Fund Budget. Notwithstanding the foregoing paragraph, if the audited financial statements are not available by the date specified, the City shall provide on or before such date unaudited financial statements in the format required for the audited financial statements as part of the Disclosure Information and, within 10 days after the receipt thereof, the City shall provide the audited financial statements. Any or all of the Disclosure Information may be incorporated by reference, if it is updated as required hereby, from other documents, including official statements, which have been submitted to each of the. repositories hereinafter referred to under subsection (b) or the SEC. If the document incorporated by reference is a final official statement, it must be available from the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board. The City shall clearly identify in the Disclosure Information each document so incorporated by reference. If any part of the Disclosure Information can no longer be generated because the operations of the City have materially changed or been. discontinued, such Disclosure Information need no longer be provided if the City includes in the Disclosure Information a statement to such effect; provided, however, if such operations have been replaced by other City operations in respect of which data is not included in the Disclosure Information and the City determines that certain specified data regarding such replacement operations would be a Material Fact (as defined in paragraph (2) of this subsection (b)), then, from and after such determination, the Disclosure Information shall include such additional specified data regarding the replacement operations. If the Disclosure Information is changed or this Section 7 is amended as permitted by this paragraph (1) or subsection (d), then the City shall include in the next Disclosure Information to be delivered hereunder, to the extent necessary, an explanation of the reasons for the amendment and the effect of any change in the type of financial information or operating data provided. (2) In a timely manner, notice of the occurrence of any of the following events which is a Material Fact (as hereinafter defined): (A) Principal and interest payment delinquencies; (B) Non - payment related defaults; (C) Unscheduled draws on debt service reserves reflecting financial difficulties; ' (D) Unscheduled draws on credit enhancements reflecting financial difficulties; (E) Substitution of credit or liquidity providers, or their failure to perform; (F) Adverse tax opinions or events affecting the tax - exempt status of the security; (G) Modifications to rights of security holders; (H) Bond calls; (1) Defeasances; (J) Release, substitution,.or sale of property securing repayment of the securities; and (K) Rating changes. As used herein, a "Material Fact" is a fact as to which a substantial likelihood exists that a reasonably prudent investor would attach importance thereto in deciding to buy, hold or sell a Bond or, if not disclosed, would significantly alter the total information otherwise available to an ' investor from the Official Statement, information disclosed hereunder or information generally available to the public. Notwithstanding the foregoing sentence, a "Material Fact" is also an event that would be deemed "material" for purposes of the purchase, holding or sale of a Bond within the meaning of applicable federal securities laws, as interpreted-at the time of discovery of the occurrence of the event. (3) In a timely manner, notice of the occurrence of any of the following events or conditions: (A) the failure of the City to provide the Disclosure Information required under paragraph (1) of this subsection (b) at the time specified thereunder; (B) the amendment or supplementing of this Section 7 pursuant to subsection (d), together with a copy of such amendment or supplement and any explanation provided by the City under paragraph (2) of subsection (d); (C) the termination of the obligations of the City under this Section 7 pursuant to subsection (d); (D) any change in, the accounting principles pursuant to which the financial statements constituting a portion of the Disclosure Information are prepared; and (E) any change in the fiscal year of the City. (c) Manner of Disclosure. The City agrees to make available the information described in subsection (b) to the following entities by telecopy, overnight delivery, mail or other m_ eans, as_ appropriate: (1) the information described in paragraph (1) of subsection (b), to each then nationally recognized municipal securities information repository under the Rule and to any state information depository then designated .or operated by the State of Minnesota as contemplated by the Rule (the "State Depository"), if any; (2) the information described in paragraphs (2) and (3) of subsection (b),.to the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board and to the State Depository, if any; and • .v (3) the information described in subsection (b), to any rating agency then maintaining a rating of the Bonds and, at the expense of such Bondowner, to any Bondowner who requests in writing such information, at the time of .transmission under paragraphs .(1) or (2) of this subsection (c), as the case may be, or, if such information is transmitted with a subsequent time of release, at the time such information is to be released. (d) Term: Amendments: Interpretation. (1) The covenants of the City in this Section 7 shall remain in effect so long as any Bonds are Outstanding. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, however, the obligations of the City under this Section 7 shall terminate and be without further effect as of any date on which the City delivers to the Registrar an opinion of Bond Counsel to the effect that, because of legislative action or final --judicial or administrative actions or -proceedings, the failure of the City to comply with the requirements of this Section 7 will not cause participating underwriters in the primary offering of the Bonds to be in violation of the Rule or other applicable requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or any statutes or laws successory thereto or amendatory thereof. (2) This Section 7 (and the form and requirements of the Disclosure Information) may be amended or supplemented by the City from time to time, without notice to (except as provided in paragraph (3) of subsection (b)) or the consent of the Owners of any Bonds, by a resolution of this Council filed in the office of the recording officer of the City accompanied by an opinion of Bond Counsel, who may rely on certificates of the City and others and the opinion may be subject to customary qualifications, to the effect that: (i) such amendment or supplement (a) is made in connection with a change in circumstances that arises from a change in law or regulation or a change in the identity, nature or status of the City or the type of operations conducted by the City, or (b) is required by, or better complies with, the provisions of paragraph (b)(5) of the Rule; (ii) this Section 7 as so amended or supplemented would have complied with the requirements of paragraph (b)(5) of the Rule at the time of the primary offering of the Bonds, giving effect to any change in circumstances applicable under clause (i)(a) and assuming that the Rule as in effect and interpreted at the time of the amendment or supplement was in effect at the time of the primary offering; and (iii) such amendment or supplement does not materially impair the interests of the Bondowners under the Rule. If the Disclosure Information is so amended, the City agrees to provide, contemporaneously with the effectiveness of such amendment, an explanation of the reasons for the amendment and the effect, if any, of the change in the type of financial information or operating data being provided hereunder. (3) This Section 7 is entered into to comply with the continuing disclosure provisions of the Rule and should be construed so as to satisfy the requirements of paragraph (b)(5) of the Rule. Section 8. Severability. If any section, paragraph or provision of this resolution shall be held to be invalid or unenforceable for any reason, the invalidity or unenforceability of such section, paragraph or provision shall not affect any of the remaining provisions of this resolution. Sec #ion 9. Headings. Headings in this resolution are included for convenience of reference only and are not a part hereof, and shall not limit or define the meaning of any provision hereof. Attest: City Clerk Mayor Member Faust seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Smith Resolution adopted. CLAIMS PAID Member Kelly made a motion to approve payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated April 3, 1997, and consisting of 40 pages: General Fund $475,651.54; Communications $1,073.81; Working Capital $10,392.66; Art Center $17,225.43; Swimming Pool Fund $13,659.45; Golf Course Fund $48,257.03; Ice Arena Fund $12,071.65; Gun Range Fund $143.11; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes $17,151.33; Utility Fund $351,110.95; ' Storm Sewer Utility Fund $229.68. Liquor Dispensary Fund $268,241.17; Construction Fund $11,925.62; Park Bond Fund $57,795.57; -IMP Bond Redemption #2 $1,076.35; 1-494 commission $29.29; TOTAL $1,286,034.64. Member Hovland seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Smith Motion carried. There being no further business on the Council agenda, Mayor Smith declared the meeting adjourned at 10:33 P.M. City Clerk MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE EDINA BOARD OF REVIEW HELD AT CITY HALL APRIL 14, 1997 AT 5:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Faust, Kelly, Maetzold and Mayor Smith. The meeting was convened pursuant to published Notice of Board of Review in the Edina Sun - Current and notice posted on City bulletin boards for the purpose of hearing those persons who considered themselves aggrieved by their property valuation for assessment purposes, or who were requesting homestead classification. Mayor Smith stated no decision would be made at this meeting, but that property owners would be notified of the Board's decision within twenty days. Further appeal may be made to the Hennepin County Board of Equalization beginning June 16, 1997. The following property owners appeared personally before the Board, or were represented to object to the Assessor's estimated market value as of January 2, 1997: The owners of the following properties submitted letters objecting to their market value and requested the Board's review: Assessors Owner's Est. Name /Address PID Number Est. Mkt. Val of Mkt. Val Ron & Judy Vessey 18- 028 -24 -24 -0026 $416,200 $395,000 4610 Wooddale Avenue Steven Lange 06- 116 -21 -32 -0001 $359,900 $315,000 6600 Pawnee Road Laurie A. Chapman 31- 117 -21-42 -0043 $240,000 $225,000 6420 Aspen Road Keith Narr 28- 117 -21 -23 -0048 $180,000 $170,000 4517 Oxford Avenue Irene Helland 29- 117 -21-41 -0028 $164,100 $135,000 5121 Blossom Court David Stein 18- 028 -24 -14 -0043 $191,400 $175,000 3936 -38 West 491h Street Gail Dean 18- 028 -24 -14 -0001 $152,200 $140,000 3925 -27 West 491h Street Bob Rinek 29- 117 -21 -14 -0045 $666,600 $584,000 6 Circle West Nader Kazeminy 21- 117 -21 -24 -0003 $1,153,100 $931,500 4900 Bywood West The owners of the following properties submitted letters objecting to their market value and requested the Board's review: Assessors Owner's Est. Name /Address PID Number Est. Mkt. Val of Mkt: Val Robert & Jo Ann Campbell 06-116721-13-0004 $340,000 None Stated 6537 Navaho Trail Betty Strader 06- 116 -21 -23 -0010 $531,300 Under $500,000 6800 Indian Hills Road. Jane H.- O'Reilly 06- 116 -21 -32 -0034 $244,000 None Stated 6708 West Trail Debbie Silberstein 08- 116 -21 -24 -0006 $198,300 $195,000 5828 Dewey Hill Road William C. Hirsch, Jr. 08- 116 -21 -32 -0021 $292,500 $280,000 7412 Hyde Park Circle Gerald & Noella Nelms 08- 116 -21 -34 -0091 $655,100 None Stated 5751 Long Brake Circle Mary Jane Meehan 28- 117 -21 -23 -0050 $170,800 None Stated 4509 Oxford Avenue Star G. Selleck 28- 117 -21 -32 -0010 $99,700 None Stated 5041 Hankerson Avenue Robin C. Davidson 29- 117 -21 -11 -0017 $467,200 None Stated 6 Circle East J. Timothy Diegel 29- 117 -21 -33 -0014 $385,200 None Stated 6024 Pine Grove Road Jack K. Ng 30- 117 -21 -12 -009.1 $141,900 .$125,000 305 Dearborn Court John Brian Costello 30- 117- 21 -33- 0127. $105,600 None Stated 6085 Lincoln Drive #318 Nord Onstad 31- 117 -21-42 -0052 $184,900 None Stated 6418 Vernon Avenue Herb Knox 07- 028 -24 -41 -0065 $145,000 $135,000 4245 Alden Avenue Kit Ketchum 07- 028 -24 -43 -0093 $129,000 - None Stated 4405 Branson Street Peter & Lydia McHugh 18- 028 -24 -21 -0076 $462,000 None Stated 4515 Edina Bouelvard Lynn & Mike Wagner 18- 028 -24 -21 -0085 $570,400 $538,000 4506 Wooddale Avenue 1 Norman & MaryBeth Chapel 18- 028 -24 -23 -0058 $854,400 None Stated 4622 Edgebrook Place William & Shirley Peck 18- 028 -24 -42 -0051 $243,600 None Stated 5004 Arden Avenue Richard & Bonita Foley 30- 028 -24 -33 -0064 $194,700 None Stated 4804 Dunberry Lane Lee Odland 32- 028 -24 -32 -0547 $103,100 None Stated 7420 Edinborough Way #6205 No further appeals being presented, motion of Member Maetzold seconded by Member Kelly to continue the 1997 Board of Review meeting to Monday, April 29, 1996 at 5:00 p.m. for decision on the appeals presented. Motion carried unanimously. TO: Mayor & Council Members FROM: Ken Rosland DATE: April 21,1997 SUBJECT: DIVERSIFIED PHARMACEUTICAL SYSTEMS/ WEST 78TH STREET PROPOSALS REPORUREC OMMENDATION Agenda Item II.A. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA 0 To Council Action ❑ Motion 0 Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: That the City Council approve the following: 1. The development with Liberty Property Limited Partnership 2. The agreement with the City of Bloomington for improvements along West 78' Street 3. Action as laid out in the attached memo regarding West 78' Street Traffic Corridor Background: Attached are two agreements and one memo that I recommend for approval. The first is an agreement between the City of Edina and Liberty Property Limited Partnership. The second is an agreement between the City of Edina and the City of Bloomington. The third is my memo regarding needed Edina action. I will cover the points Monday night; however, they are somewhat similar to the original ones described at the last meeting. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA �o� LIBERTY PROPERTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP April ___, 1997 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT This Agreement is made, this _ day of April, 1997, by and-between the CITY OF EDINA, a municipal corporation ( "Edina ") and LIBERTY PROPERTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a RHNSy&vPm1P, limited partnership ( "Liberty "). WITNESSETH: l� WHEREAS, Liberty owns an approximately 11.04 acre site located south of West 78th Street and west of Cecilia Circle legally described on Exhibit A hereto (the "Site "); WHEREAS, a portion of the Site is located in the corporate limits of the City of Bloomington and a portion is located in the corporate limits of Edina; WHEREAS, Liberty proposes to construct on the portion of the Site located in Bloomington an office building containing a floor area of approximately 350,529 square feet _together with a parking structure and other site improvements as identified on the site plan prepared by RSP, Inc. dated NMIL 3 1997 (the office building, parking structure and other site improvements are collectively referred to as the "Development "); WHEREAS, access to the Development is proposed to be provided from Cecilia Circle and from West 78th Street; WHEREAS, Liberty desires that Edina undertake certain roadway improvements to West 78th Street and install a traffic signal at the intersection of West 78th Street and Cecilia Circle (the "Street Improvements "), and that Edina grant a permit (the "Curb Cut Permit ") under Section 1205 of the Edina City Code with respect to the driveway providing access to the Development from West 78th Street; WHEREAS, Edina agrees to construct the Street Improvements and grant the Curb Cut Permit subject to the terms and conditions herein; Section 1. Construction of Street Improvements. Edina will construct the Street Improvements as further described in Exhibit B hereto. Liberty agrees to pay at least $261,000 but not more than $281,000 to Edina to partially cover costs of the Street Improvements. Liberty's payment is intended to cover all costs associated with signalizing the intersection of West 78th Street and Cecilia Circle and one -half of the- cost of roadway improvements between Cecilia Circle and the west boundary of the Site, which signalization and roadway improvements are. included in the Street Improvements. Following completion of the Street Improvements, Edina will provide Liberty a "unit cost" itemization of the project cost of the Street Improvements. If the cost of signalizing West 78th and Cecilia plus the cost of constructing one -half of the roadway improvements on West 78th Street between Cecilia Circle and the west boundary of the site exceeds $261,000, Liberty agrees to pay up to an additional $20,000 to Edina. In no event, however, will Liberty's payment be less than $261,000. Payment by Liberty will be due 30 days following invoicing by Edina. Any amounts not'paid when due shall bear interest at 12% per annum, on the portion unpaid, from the due date until paid. To secure its obligation to make such payment Liberty has deposited with Edina a letter of credit issued by in the amount of $281,000 (the "Letter of Credit "). If Liberty shall fail to make a payment required hereunder Edina may draw under the'Letter of Credit to provide for such payment. Section 2. Landscaping of Site. Liberty agrees to provide a landscaping plan for the Site and schedule acceptable to Edina, and in conformance with requirements of Bloomington. The landscaping plan will emphasize screening along the north side of the parking structure and the north side of the northerly surface parking lot. The landscaping shall be subject to final approval by the Edina Planning Director and the Bloomington Planning Manager. -Liberty agrees to post a landscape performance bond or other suitable security with Bloomington guaranteeing all plant materials for two growing seasons. Liberty further agrees to assume maintenance responsibility for all plantings within the public right of way of West 78th Street adjacent to the north side of the Site. Section 3. Parking Structure_. Liberty agrees to move the westerly access to the parking structure included in the Development as far to the south as practicable. In addition, Liberty agrees that no egress from the parking structure shall be permitted on the west side of the parking structure, and that through signage and other appropriate measures to direct vehicular traffic to exit the Site using Cecilia Circle. Section 4. Access to Site from West 78th Street Curb Cut Permit. Liberty agrees to direct all construction traffic to enter and exit the site using Cecilia Circle. Edina agrees that upon substantial completion of the construction of the Development it will issue a Curb Cut Permit with respect to the driveway providing access to the Development from West 78th Street. Liberty agrees to provide any right of way required for the right turn lane on West 78th Street to enter the West 78th Street driveway to the Development that is to be constructed as part of the Street Improvements. Section 5. Limits on Additional Office Building on Site. Plans for the Site include the possibility of .the construction of an additional office building (the "Additional Building ") on the Northwestern Expansion Area of the Site as identified in the site plan prepared by RSP, Inc., dated April 3, 1997. The Additional Building would be located in corporate limits of Bloomington. Liberty agrees to the following conditions with respect to the construction of the Additional Building in -2- consideration for Edina constructing the Street Improvements and issuing the Curb Cut Permit: (a) Plans for the Additional Building shall be submitted to Edina for site plan, landscaping and design review; (b) The Additional Building shall be limited to 27 feet in height, measured from the ground elevation along the northerly elevation of the Additional Building; (c) The Additional Building shall be limited to a total "gross floor area" of 48,000 square feet as defined in Section 850 of the Edina Code; (d) Liberty will not construct the Additional Building for any tenant except for Diversified Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. ( "DPS "), another affiliate of SmithKline Beecham Health Care Services (which is the parent corporation of DPS) or a tenant providing contract services to DPS; and (e) Liberty will not subdivide the Site to create a new. lot on which the Additional Building, will be constructed. It is intended that the covenants set forth in this Section 5 shall be covenants running with the land binding to the fullest extent permitted by law and equity for the benefit and in favor of, and enforceable by Edina against Liberty .and its successors and assigns, and to evidence this Liberty shall cause the Declaration of Restrictive Covenants in the form attached a Exhibit C hereto to be executed by Liberty and recorded in the appropriate real estate records of Hennepin County on the title to the Site. In addition to any remedies available to Edina upon a violation of the covenants herein, Liberty acknowledges and agrees that if the conditions set forth in this Section 5 are not complied with, Edina may revoke the Curb Cut Permit and require that the driveway access to the Site for West 78th Street be closed. Section., 6. Notices and Demands. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, a notice, demand, or other communication under this Agreement by either party to the other shall be sufficiently given or delivered if it is - dispatched by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, or delivered personally as follows: -3- (a) in the case of Liberty, addressed to or delivered personally to Liberty at SUITE 390 i g3O SECONv kveT1UE SW i1a Y1I04EP'FOL1S , MN , _55401 Attention: -SoNN S. C-sA-rTV5O and (b) in the case of Edina, addressed to or delivered personally to Edina at 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424, Attention: City Manager; or at such other address with respect to any such party as that party may, from time to time, designate in writing and forward to the other parties as provided in this Section. Section 7. Counterparts. This Agreement is executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument. -4- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of _, 1997, by the Mayor and the City Manger of the City of Edina. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of .1997, by . a general partner of Liberty Property Limited Partnership, on behalf of the partnership. DRAFTED BY: Dorsey & Whitney LLP (JPG) Pillsbury Center South 220 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 Ir . Notary Public EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SITE EXHIBIT B DESCRIPTION OF STREET IMPROVEMENTS EXHIBIT C DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS This Declaration is 1997, by Liberty Property partnership ( "Declarant "). Recitals made and executed as of the day of Limited Partnership, a limited A. Declarant is fee owner of the following described premises located in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota (the "Property "): [insert legal description] B. The City of Edina , a Minnesota municipal corporation, has entered into a Development Agreement, dated April _, 1997 (the "Development Agreement "), with the Declarant. The Development Agreement contains the agreement by Edina to construct roadway improvements to W. 78th Street, which roadway improvements the Declarant desires Edina to undertake and which will be of benefit to the Property, and for the issuance by Edina of a permit (the "Curb Cut Permit ") under Section 1205 of the Edina Cite Code with respect to a driveway provides access to the Property from W. 78th Street. _ C. Section 5 of the Development Agreement provides for this Declaration to be executed by Declarant and for this Declaration to be filed of record in the real estate records. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and in compliance with its obligations under Section 5 of the Development Agreement, Declarant, for itself, and its successors and assigns, does hereby declare that the Property shall be owned, used, occupied, sold and conveyed subject to the following covenants and restrictions: 1. Plans for the Property include the possibility of the construction of an additional office building (the "Additional Building ") on the Northwestern Expansion Area of the Property as identified in the site plan prepared by RSP, Inc., dated April 3, 1997. The following conditions shall apply to the Property with respect to the construction of the Additional Building: (a) Plans for the Additional Building shall be submitted to Edina for site plan, landscaping and design review; (b) The Additional Building shall be limited to 27 feet in height, measured from the ground elevation along the northerly elevation of the Additional Building; (c) . The Additional Building shall be limited to a total "Gross floor area" of 48,000 square feet as defined in Section 850 of the Edina Code; (d) The Additional Building shall not be constructed for any tenant except for Diversified Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. ( "DPS "), another affiliate of Smith Kline Beecham - Health Care Services (which -is the parent corporation of DPS) or a tenant providing contract services to DPS; and (e) The Declarant will not subdivide the Property to create a new lot on which the Additional Building will be constructed. 2. The covenants and restrictions herein contained shall run with the title to the Property and shall be binding upon all present and future owners and occupants of the Property; provided, however, that the covenants and restrictions herein contained shall inure only to the benefit of Edina, and may be released or waived in whole or in part at any time, and from time to time, by the sole act of Edina, and variances may be granted to the covenants and restrictions herein contained by the sole act of Edina. These covenants and restrictions shall be enforceable only by Edina, and only Edina shall have the right to sue for and obtain an injunction, prohibitive or mandatory, to prevent the breach of the covenants and restrictions herein contained, or to enforce the performance or observance thereof. In addition, to any remedies available to Edina to enforce the performance or observance of the covenants and restrictions herein contained, after any breach of the covenants or restrictions herein contained Edina may revoke the Curb Cut Permit and required that driveway access to the Property from W. 78th Street be closed. 3. If any one or more of the covenants or restrictions contained in this Declaration are held to be invalid or enforceable. the same shall in no way affect any of the other provisions of this Declaration, which shall remain in full force and effect. LIBERTY PROPERTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP M. 2 Its ,i ,. a i loi a rxi 13: z6 t -ALK 16123402644 DORSEY WHITNEY 10002 AGREEMENT RELATED TO IMPROVEMENTS ON W. 78TH STREET CORRIDOR This Agreement is made this day of April, 1997, by and between the City of Edina ( "Edina "), a municipal corporation organized. and existing, under the laws of the State of Minnesota, and the City of Bloomington ( "Bloomington "), a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 1. Recitals. Edina and Bloomington desire to bring about improvements to W. 78th Street in the area from the intersection of W. 78th Street and East Bush Lake Road westerly to T.H. 169 (the "W. 78th Street Corridor "). In the W. 78th Street Corridor a portion of W. 78th Street is located wholly in Edina, a portion is located wholly in Bloomington and a portion serves as the common corporate limits of Edina and Bloomington: 'Edina and Bloomington have commissioned a traffic study for the W. 78th. Street Corridor from. SRF Consulting Croup Inc., which study recommends .roadway improvements in the W. 78th Strt-et Corridor. Pursuant to Min.nesoti Statutes, Section 471.59, Edina and Bloomington desire to I*ointly anal. cooperatively exercise_ power common to them to provide for roadway improvements in the W. 78th Street Corridor, and Edina desires that Bloomington review its land use policies-in the W. 78th'Street Corridor area and the policies impact on traffic conditions on W. -78th Street and in Southwest Edina. 2. Improvements on W. 78th Street From Soo Line Railroad Bridge to Cecilia Circle. Edina shall cause that portion of W. 78th Street from the Soo Line Railroad Bridge to Cecilia Circle to be improved in 1.997. Such improvement is identified by Edina as Improvement Project BA -314 and includes the installation of a traffic signal at W. 78th Street and. Cahill Road and the addition of a 'fi.fth lane to W. 78th Street to allow for left turn unto Cahill Road, Cecilia Circle and driveways on the south side of W., -78th Street. Such improvements shall be undertaken at the sole cost and expense of Edina. 3. Improvements to Tntersection of W. 78th Street and Wept Bush Lake Road. Bloomington. Shall - cause the intersection of West Bush Lake road and W. 78th Street to be improved by the installation of traffic signals and geometric changes to the intersection. The undertaking of such improvement by Bloomington is subject to Edina constructing the frontage road on the west side of Braemar. Park from W. 78th Street to Valley View road as provided in Section 4 hereof. Subject to the foregoing condition, such improvements shall be completed by December 1, 1998 or as soon as practicable thereafter, due to delays in construction by Edina in the frontage road referred to in Section. 4 hereof, and shall be undertaken at the sole cost and expense of Bloomington. 4. - Braemar Park Frontage Road. Edina agrees to construct a frontage road on the west side of Braemar Park from 'W. 76th Street to Valley View u #iioia7 rFci t3:zo r:U 161Y3402644 DORSEY WHITNEY 9903 Road. The construction by Edina of such frontage road is subject to the approval by the Minnesota Department of Transportation and to the obtaining by Edina of necessary rights of way, permits and easements required for the construction of such frontage road and to the availability of State Aid funding. The construction of such frontage road shall be completed, by December 1, 1998 or as soon as practicable thereafter duce to delays in the obtaining by Edina of the necessary approvals, permits, approvals or' State Aid funding, rights, of way, and easements, and shall be undertaken at the sole cost and expense of Edina. 5. Improvements from c'ecilia Circle to Approximately 200 Feet West of C lea-9 n Road. " A. Edina and Bloomington shall jointly provide for the improvement of W. 78th Street from Cecilia Circle to approximately 200 feet west of Gleason Road, including the installation of traffic signals at the intersection of Cecilia Circle and W. 78th Street (collectively the "joint Street Improvements "). A portion of W. 78th Street in. this area is located wholly in Edina and a portion serves as the common corporate border of Edina and Bloomington. B. Edina will prepare detailed final plans and specifications for the Joint Street Improvements and submit to Bloomington and the State Aid Engineer for approval. Upon approval by Bloomington and the State Aid Engineer, Edina will advertise for bids for the construction of the Joint Street Improvements as one combined project, and will receive and open bids pursuant to said advertisement. Once Edina has determined. the bid to be accepted, Edina shall enter into a contract with such bidder, hereinafter referred to as "Contractor," at the unit prices specified in the bid of such bidder. The contract will be in the form required by the bidding documents Prepared by Edina and will include the plans and specifications prepared by Edina and approved by Bloomington and the State Aid Engineer. All bonds obtained by Edina in connection with the contract shall name Edina only as the obligee. C. The construction of the Joint Street Improvements shall be under the supervision and direction of Edina. However, the Engineer of Bloomington shall cooperate with the Edina Engineer and his staff, at their request, to the extent .reasonably requested, but will have no responsibility for the supervision of the Joint Street Improvements. D. Each party shall acquire, at its own cost, all rights of-way, permits, and. easements required for construction of that portion of the Joint Street Improvements lying within their respective corporate .limits. Bloomington shall notify Edina promptly upon the obtaining by Bloomington of the rights _2_ u i1oiai rRi 13:36 r'il 161134UY644 DORSEY WHITNEY of way, permits, and easements required for construction of that portion of the.Street Improvements lying within Bloomington, and will also promptly advise Edina of any delays in acquiring such rights that will or may affect the orderly and timely progress of the construction of the Street Improvements on the time schedule set out in the, contract with the Contractor. . E. Bloomington shall pay to Edina, as -Bloomington's share of the cost of the Joint Street improvements, the total of the following amounts, h.e.reinafter. referred, to in this Section 4 as "Bloomington's Share ": - i. 50% of the Construction Cost, as below defined; ii. 15% of i. above in this paragraph E, for engineering costs performed or incurred by Edina. For purposes of this Section 4, Construction Cost shall mean and include the total cost paid or incurred by Edina in connection with the construction of the portion of the Joint Street Improvements on West 78th Street which serves as the common corporate limits of Edina and Bloomington. All costs of construction of the portion of the Joint Street Improvements on the portion of West 78th Street which is located 'wholly in Edina, shall be paid by Edina. Bloomington acknowledges that a portion of such cost shall be paid by Liberty Property Limited Partnership ( "Liberty Property ") to Edina. F. Within sixty days after the date of the contract with Contractor., Bloomington shall pay to Edina 50% of Edina's then estimate of Bloomington's Share. The balance of Bloomington', Share shall be paid to Ed na,upon completion of the Joint Street Improvements, upon settlement of, or final judgment in, all disputes referred to in paragraph H hereof, and within 45 days after submittal to Bloomington of a Final Estimate for the Joint Street Improvements prepared by Edina's Engineer. Any sums not paid when due hereunder shall bear interest at 8% per annum., on the portion unpaid, from the due date until paid. G. The Edina Engineer sha.11 prepare monthly estimates of the Construction Cost and shall deliver a copy of each to Bloomington. H. Edina shall have, and has, full power and authority, for and on behalf of Edina and Bloomington, after consultation and concurrence of Bloomington, to negotiate, compromise, settle, or litigate any disputes of any kind with the Contractor, and surety on any bond obtained by Edina in connection with the contract with Contractor, or with any other person or -3- 16004 u4i16i97 rRI 13:36 FAX 16123402644 DORSEY WHITNEY entity, arising out of or due to the awarding, interpreting, or enforcing of the contract with Contractor, any such bond, or the construction of the Joint Street Improvements. 1. All records kept by Bloomington and Edirta with respect to the Joint Street Improvements shall be subject to examination .by the representatives of each at reasonable times during normal business hours. J- The parties shall cause the Joint Street Improvements to be completed by December. 1, .1998. 6. Improvements 'to Intersection East Bush Lake Road and W 78th Street. A Edina and Bloomington shall jointly provide for improvement to the intersection of East Bush Lake Road and W. 78th Street (the, "joint Intersection Improvements "). The obligation herein to undertake the joint In.te.rsection Improvements shall be subject to the approval of Henn.epin County. B. Edina will prepare detailed final plans and specifications for the Intersection Improvements and submit to Bloomington and the State .Aid Engineer for approval. Upon, approval by ,Bloomington and the State Aid Engineer, Edina will. advertise for bids for the construction of-the Joint Intersection Improvements as one combined project, and will receive and open bids pursuant to said advertisement. Once Ed.i.n.a has determined the bid, to be accepted, Edina shall enter into a contract with such bidder, hereinafter referred to as "Contractor," at the unit prices specified in the bid of such bidder. The contract will be in the form required by the bidding documents prepared by Edina and will, include the plans and specifications prepared by Edina and approved by Bloomington and the State Aid. Engineer. All bonds obtained by Edina in connection with the contract shall name Edina only as the obligee. C. The construction. of the Joint Intersection Improvements shall be under the supervision and direction of Edina. However, the Engineer of Bloomington shall cooperate with the Edina Engineer and his staff, at their request, to the extent reasonably requested, but will have no responsibility for the supervision of the Joint Intersection Improvements. D. Each party shall acquire, at its own cost, all rights of way, permits; and easements required for construction of that portion of the joint Intersection Improvements lying within their respective corporate limits. Bloomington shall notify Edina promptly upon the obtaining by -4- P, fo05 u4 /l6/9 FRI 13:37 FAX 16123402644 DORSEY WHITNEY Bloomington of the rights of way, permits, and easements required for . construction of that portion of the joint. Intersection Improvements lying within Bloomington, and will also promtly advise Edina of any delays in acquiring such rights that will or may affect the orderly and timely progress of the construction of the Joint Intersection Improvements on the time schedule set out in the contract with "the Contractor. E. Bloomington shall pay to Edina, as Bloomington's share of the cost of the Joint Intersection. Improvements, the total of -the following amounts, hereinafter referred to in - this Section 5 as "Bloomington - s Share ": i. 50% of the Construction Cost, as below defined.; ii. 15% of i. above in this paragraph E, for engineering costs performed or incurred by Edina. For purposes of this Section 5 Construction Cost shall incur and include the total cost paid or incurred by Edina in connection with the Joint Intersection. Improvements, less such portion of the cost of the Joint Intersection Improvements, if array, paid, by Hennepin County.,, F. Within sixty days, after the date of the contract with Contractor, Bloomington shall pay to Edina 50% of Ed.i..na's then estimate of Bloomington's Share. The balance.of Bloomington's Share shall be paid to Edina upon completion of the Joint Intersection Improvements, upon settlement of, or final judgment in, all disputes referred to in paragraph H hereof, and within. 45 days after submittal to Bloomington of a Final Estimate for the Intersection Improvements prepared by Edina's Engineer. Any sums not paid when due hereunder shall bear interest at 8% per annum, on the portion unpaid, from the due date until paid.. G. The Edina Engineer shall prepare montl-ly estimates of the Construction Cost and shall deliver a copy of each -to Bloomington. H. Edina shall have, and has, full power and authority, for and. on behalf of Edina and Bloomington, after consultation and concurrence of Bloomington, to negotiate, compromise, settle, or litigate any disputes of any kind with the Contractor, and surety on any bond obtained by Edina in. connection with the contract with Contractor, or with any other person or entity, arising out of or due to the awarding, interpreting, or enforcing of the contract with Contractor, any such bond, or the construction of the Intersection Improvements. ' .5- [a 006 v :r lvr al rill 1J.J1 r'i_1 101LJ4ueb44 .J)URSE1 nriil�`EY I. All records kept by Bloomington and Fdina with respect to the Intersection Improvements shall be subject to examination by the representatives of each at reasonable times during normal business .hours. J. The parties shall cause the joint Intersection Improvements to be completed by December 1, 1998 or as soon as practicable thereafter if the required approval by-Hennepin County is not received by a. date which permits the Joint Intersection. Improvements to be completed by such date. 7. Installation of Traffic Signal at Gleason Road. A. Edina and Bloomington agree that at such time as the intersection of Gleason Road and W. 78th Street meets the traffic signal warrants which are. required for State Aid funding Edina may install traffic Signals at such intersection (the "Gleason Traffic Signals,'). Edina may provide for the installation of such traffic signals if the intersection does not meet traffic signal warrants required for State Aid funding at its Sole cost and expense and Bloomington shall not be responsible for the payment of any cost of the installation of the Gleason Traffic Signals in such event. The traffic signals shall be operated and. maintained by Edina and Edina.. shall be responsible for all costs of operation thereof. B. Edina. will prepare detailed final plans and specifications for the Gleason Traffic ,Signals and submit to Bloom.in.gton and the State Aid Engineer (if State Aid funding is to be utilized) for approval. Upon approval by Bloomington and the State Aid Engineer, Edina will advertise for. bids for the installation of the Gleason Traffic Signals as one combined project, and will receive and open bids pursuant to said advertisement. Once Edina has determined the bid to be accepted, Edina s.ha.l.l. enter into a contract with such bidder, hereinafter referred to as "Contracto.r., at the unit prices specified in the bid of such bidder. The contract will be in the form required by .the bidding documents prepared by Edina and will include the plans and specifications prepared. by Edina and approved by Bloomington and the State Aid Engineer. (if State Aid funding is to be utilized). All bonds obtained. by Edina in connection with the contract shall name Edina only as the obligee. C. The installation of the Gleason Traffic Signals shall be Colder the supervision and direction of Edina. However, the Engineer of Bloomington shall cooperate with the Edina Engineer and his staff, at their request, to the extent reasonably requested, but will have no responsibility for the supervision of the-installation of -the Gleason Traffic Signals. D. If the intersection meets the traffic signal warrants which are required for State Aid funding Bloomington shall pay to Edina, as -6- ,1A00i uii iai y i r1%1 14; 40 rA-A, 161L34UL644 DURSEY VVAILNEY It Bloomington's share of the cost of the Gleason Traffic Signals, the total of the following amounts, hereinafter. referred to as "Bloomington's, Share ": i. 50% of the Construction Cost, as below defined; ii. 15% of i. above in this paragraph E, for engineering costs performed or incurred by Edina. For purposes of this Section 6, Construction Costs shall incur and include the total costs paid or incurred by Edina in connection with the installation of the Gleason Traffic Signals. E. Within sixty days after the date of the contract with Contractor, Bloomington shall pay to Edina 50% of Edina's then estimate of Bloomington's Share. The balance of Bloomington's Share shall be paid to Edina upon completion of the Gleason Traffic Signals, upon settlement of, or final judgment in., all disputes referred to in paragraph G hereof, and within 45 days after submittal to Bloomington of a Final Estimate for the cost of installation of the Gleason Traffic Signals prepared by Ed.in.a.'s Engineer. Any sums not paid when due hereunder shall bear interest at 8% per annum, on the portion unpaid, from the due date until paid. F. If Bloomington is liable for the payment of any costs of the installation of the Gleason Traffic Signals, the Edina Engineer shall prepare monthly estimates of the Construction Cost and shall' deliver a copy of each to Bloomington. G. Edina shall have, and has, full power' and- authority, for and on behalf of Edina and Bloomington, after consultation and concurrence of Bloomington, to negotiate, compromise, settle, or litigate any disputes of any kind with the Contractor, and surety on any bond obtained by Edina in connection with the contract with Contractor, or with any other person or entity, arising out of or due to the awarding, interpreting, or enforcing of the contract with Contractor, any such bond, or the installation of the Gleason Traffic Signals. I i. All records kept by Bloomington and Edina with respect to the Gleason Traffic Signals shall be subject to examination by the 8. Landscaping Frond for Liberty Property /DPS Development. In connection with the proposed office to be undertaken by Liberty Property in Bloomington south of W. 78th Street and west of Cecilia Circle, a landscaping plan and schedule acceptable to Edina and in conformance with the requirements of -7- 10008 V -k/ to/ y riii 1J: 00 ry-i 101,�31UL644 DORSEY WHITNEY Bloomington is required to be provided by Liberty Property to Bloomington together with a landscaping performance bond or other suitable security to be posted by Liberty Property with Bloomington guaranteeing all plant materials for two growing seasons. Bloomington agrees to draw on the landscaping performance bond or other suitable security if .required to ensure the performance by Liberty Property of the requirements of the landscaping plan and schedule. y. Review by Bl� oornington of Land Use Policies in Area of West 78th Street Corridor. A. As a part of updating its comprehensive municipal plan pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.355, Bloomington will review its land. use policies in the area of the W. 78th Street Corridor, in particular the permitted density of a development in this area and its effect on the orderly flow of traffic: on. W. 78th Street and in the southwest area of Edina. Sanitary sewer service to property which is located in Bloomington in the'area of the W. 78th Street Corridor is provided by Edina and the ability of Ed..iria, to provide such sanitary sewer to new development in Bloomington in such area is limited by the permitted capacity of Edina's sanitary sewer.system. In reviewing its land use policies in the area of the W. 78th Street Corridor and any proposed new development in. such area, Bloomington shall also consider the effect of such policies and development on the capacity of the Edina sanitary sewer system. B. Bloomington and Edina agree that if additional development in the area of the W. 78th Street Corridor requires further roadway improvements to W. 78th Street beyond the improvements described herein in order to maintain an orderly flow of traffic in the W. 78th Street Corridor, they will jointly discuss and agree on the scope and extent of required roadway improvements to W. 78th Street and provide for an. equitable sharing of the cost of such roadway improvements. .10. Separate Obligations and Responsibilities. Any and all employees of Bloomington and ali other persons engaged by Bloomington in the performance of any work or services required, volunteered, or provided for herein to be performed by Bloomington in connection with improvements to the W. 78th Street Corridor described herein shall not be considered employees of Edina, and that any and all claims that may or might arise under. the Worker's Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf, of said employees while so engaged, and any and all claims made by any third parties as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of said employees while so engaged on any. of the -work or services provided to be rendered herein shall in no way be the obligation or responsibility of Edina. Also, any and all employees of Edina and all other persons engaged by Edina in the performance of any work or services required or provided for herein to be 12 11&09 U4/id/97 rRI 13:39 FAX 16123402644 DORSEY WHITNEY performed by Edina shall not be considered employees of Bloomington, and that any and all claims that may or might arise under the Worker's Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf of said employees while so engaged, and any and all claims made by any third parties as a consequence of any act or omission on the' part of said employees while so engaged on any of the work or services provided to be rendered herein shall in no way be the obligation or responsibility of Bloomington. 11. Notices. All notices, reports or demands required or permitted to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to be given when delivered personally to any officer of the-party to which notice is being given, or when deposited in the United States mail in a sealed envelope, with registered or certified mail postage prepaid thereon, addressed to the parties at the following addresses: To Edina: 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Attention: City Manager To Bloomington: 2215 West Old Shakopee Road Bloomington, Minnesota 55431 Attention: City Manager Such addresses may be changed by either party upon notice to the other party given as herein provided. In Q010 Cit3 law mw Mir CHANGES HILIGHTED ON AGENDA ITEM II.A. Agreement Related to Improvements on West 78th Street Corridor and between the ting under the nington "), a State of 1. citals. trclina ana n.tvumu16wu ucsut:-w ufmg about improvements to W. 78th Street in the area from the intersection of W. 78th Street and East Bush Lake Road westerly to T.H. 169 (the "W. 78th Street Corridor "). In the W. 78th Street Corridor a portion of W. 78th Street is located wholly in Edina.,-a portion is located wholly in Bloomington and a portion serves as the common corporate limits of Edina and Bloomington. Edina and Bloomington have commissioned a traffic study for the W. 78th Street Corridor from SRF Consulting Group Inc., which study recommends roadway improvements in the W. 78th Street Corridor. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59, Edina and Bloomington desire to jointly and cooperatively exercise power common to them to provide for roadway improvements in the W. 78th Street Corridor, and Edina desires that Bloomington review its land use policies in the W. 78t1i Street Corridor area and the policies impact on traffic conditions on W. 78th Street and in Southwest Edina. 2. improvements on W 78th Street From Soo Line Railroad Bridge to Cecilia. Circle. Edina shall cause that portion of W.' 78th Street from the Soo Line Railroad Bridge to Cecilia Circle to be improved in 1997. Such improvement is identified by Edina as Improvement Project BA -314 and includes the installation of a traffic signal at W. 78th Street and Cahill Road and the addition of a fifth lane to W. 78th Street to allow for left turn unto Cahill Road, Cecilia Circle and driveways on the south side of W. 78th Street. Such improvements shall be undertaken at the sole cost and expense of Edina. 3. Improvements to Intersection of W. 78th Street and West Bush Lake Road. Bloomington shall cause the intersection of West Bush Lake Road and' W. 78th Street to be improved by the installation' of traffic signals and geometric changes to the intersection. The .undertaking of such improvement by Bloomington is subject to Edina constructing the frontage road on the west side of Braemar Park from W. 78th Street to -Valley View Road 'as provided in Section 4 hereof. Subject to the foregoing condition, such improvements shall, be completed by December 1, 1998 or as soon as practicable thereafter due to delays in construction by Edina in the frontage road referred to in Section 4 hereof, and shall be undertaken at the sole cost and expense of Bloomington. 4. Braemar Park Frontage Road. Edina agrees to construct a frontage road on the west side of Braemar Park from W. 78th Street to Valley View P Road. The construction by Edina of such frontage road is subject to the approval by the . Minnesota Department of Transportation and -to the obtaining by Edina of necessary rights of wav, permits and easements required for the construction of such frontage road and to the availability of State .Aid funding. The construction of such frontage road shall be completed by December 1, 1998 or as soon as practicable thereafter due to delays in the obtaining by Edina of the necessary approvals, permits, approvals or State Aid funding, rights of way and easements, and shall be undertaken at the sole cost acid expense of Edina. 5. mprovements from Cecilia Circle to Approximately 2(l0 Feet West of Gleason Road. A.. Edina and Bloomington shall jointly provide for the improvement of W. 78th Street from Cecilia Circle to approximately 200 feet west of Gleason Road, including the installation of traffic signals at the intersection of Cecilia Circle and W. 78th Street (collectively the "Joint Street Improvements "). A portion of W. 78th Street in this area is located wholly in Edina and a portion serves as the common corporate border of Edina and Bloomington. B. Edina will prepare detailed final plans and specifications for the Joint Street Improvements and submit to Bloomington and the State Aid Engineer, for approval. Upon approval by Bloomington and the State Aid Engineer, Edina will advertise for bids for the construction of the Joint Street Improvements .as one combined project, and will receive and open bids pursuant tO. said advertisement. Once Edina has determined the bid to be accepted, .Edina shall enter into a contract with such bidder, hereinafter referred to as "Contractor," at the unit prices specified in the bid of such bidder. The contract will be in the.form required by the bidding documents prepared by Edina and will include the plans and specifications prepared by Edina and approved by Bloomington and the State Aid Engineer. All bonds obtained by Edina in connection with the contract shall name Edina only as the obligee. C. The construction of the joint Street Improvements shall be under the supervision and direction of Edina. However, the Engineer of Bloomington shall cooperate with the Edina Engineer and his staff, at their request, to .the extent reasonably requested, but will have no responsibility for the supervision, of the -joint Street Improvements. D. Each party shall acquire, at its own cost, all rights of way, permits, and easements required for construction of that portion of the Joint Street Improvements lying within their respective corporate limits. Bloomington shall notify Edina promptly upon the obtaining by Bloomington of the rights -2- of way, permits, and' easements required for construction of that portion of the Street Improvements lying within Bloomington, and will also promptly advise Edina of any delays in acquiring such rights that will or may affect the orderly and timely progress of the construction of the Street Improvements on the time schedule set out in the contract with the Contractor. E. Bloomington shall pay to Edina, as Bloomington's share of the cost of the Joint Street Improvements, the total of the following amounts, hereinafter referred to in this Section 4 as "Bloomington's Share ": - i. 50% of the Construction Cost, as below defined; ii. 15% of i. above in this paragraph E, for engineering costs performed or incurred by Edina. For purposes of this Section 4, Construction Cost shall mean and include the total cost paid or incurred by Edina in connection with the construction of the portion of the Joint Street Improvements on West 78th Street which serves as the common corporate liinits of Edina and Bloomington. All costs of construction of the portion of the Joint Street Improvements on the portion of West 78th Street which is located wholly in Edina shall be paid by Edina. Bloomington acknowledges that a portion of such cost shall be paid by Liberty Property Limited Partnership ( "Liberty Property ") to Edina. F. Within sixty days after the date of the contract with Contractor, Bloomington shall pay to Edina 50% of Edina's then estimate of Bloomington's Share. The balance of Bloomington's Share shall be paid to Edina upon completion of the Joint Street Improvements, upon settlement of, or final judgment in, all disputes referred to in paragraph H hereof, and within 45 days after submittal to Bloomington of a Final Estimate for the Joint Street Improvements prepared by Edina's Engineer. Any sums not paid when due hereunder shall bear interest at 8% per annum, on the portion unpaid, from the due date until paid. G. The Edina Engineer shall prepare monthly estimates of the Construction Cost and shall deliver a copy of each to Bloomington. H. Edina shall have, and has, full power and authority, for and on behalf of Edina and Bloomington, after consultation and concurrence of Bloomington, to negotiate, compromise, settle, or litigate any disputes of any kind with the Contractor, and surety on any bond obtained by Edina in connection with the contract with Contractor, or with any other person or -3- Street entity, arising out of or due to the awarding, interpreting, or enforcing of the contract with Contractor, any such bond, or the construction of the Joint Street Improvements. I. All records kept by Bloomington and Edina with respect to the Joint Street Improvements shall, be subject to examination by the representatives of each at reasonable times during normal business hours. J. . The parties shall cause the Joint Street Improvements to be completed by December 1, 1998. 6. Improvements to Tntersection Fast Bush T..ake Road and W. 78th A. Edina and Bloomington shall jointly provide for improvement to the intersection of East Bush Lake Road and W. 78th Street (the "Joint Intersection Improvements "). The obligation herein to undertake the Joint Intersection Improvements shall be subject to the approval of Hennepin County. B. Edina will prepare detailed final plans and specifications for the Intersection Improvements and submit to Bloomington and the State Aid Engineer for approval. Upon approval by Bloomington and the State Aid Engineer, Edina will advertise for bids for the construction of the.Joint Intersection Improvements as one combined project, and will receive, and open bids pursuant to said advertisement. Once Edina has determined the bid to be accepted, Edina shall enter into a contract with such bidder, hereinafter referred to as "Contractor," at the unit prices specified in the bid of such bidder. The contract will be in the form required by the bidding documents prepared by Edina and will include the plans and specifications prepared by Edina and approved by Bloomington and the State Aid Engineer. All bonds obtained by Edina in connection with the contract shall name Edina only as the obligee. C The construction of the Joint Intersection Improvements shall be under the supervision and direction of Edina. However, the Engineer of Bloomington shall cooperate with the Edina Engineer and his staff, at their request, to the extent reasonably requested, but will have no responsibility for the supervision of the Joint Intersection Improvements. D. Each party shall acquire, at its own cost, all rights of way, permits, and easements required for construction of that portion of the joint Intersection Improvements lying within. their respective corporate limits. Bloomington shall notify Edina promptly upon the obtaining by -4- Bloomington of the rights of way, permits, and easements required for construction of that portion of the Joint Intersection Improvements lying within Bloomington, and will also promptly advise Edina of any delays in acquiring such rights that will or may affect the orderly and timely progress of the construction of the Joint Intersection Improvements on the time schedule set out in the contract with the Contractor. E. Bloomington shall pay to Edina; as Bloomington's share of the cost of the Joint Intersection Improvements, the total of the following amounts, hereinafter referred to in this Section 5 as "Bloomington's Share ": i. 50% of the Construction Cost, as below defined; ii. 15% of i. above in this paragraph E, for engineering costs performed or incurred by Edina. For purposes of this Section 5 Construction Cost shall mean and include the total cost paid or incurred by Edina in connection with the ]'Dint Intersection Improvements, less such portion of the cost of the Joint Intersection Improvements, if any, paid by Hennepin County. F. Within sixty days after, the date of the contract with Contractor, Bloomington shall pay to Edina 50% of Edina's then estimate of Bloomington's Share. The balance of Bloomington's Share shall be paid to Edina upon completion of the Joint intersection Improvements, upon settlement of, or final judgment in, all disputes referred to in paragraph H hereof, and within 45 days after submittal to Bloomington of a Final Estimate for the Intersection Improvements prepared by Edina's Engineer. Any sums not paid when due hereunder shall bear interest at 8% per annum, on the portion unpaid, from the due date until paid. G. The Edina Engineer shall prepare monthly estimates of the Construction. Cost and shall deliver a copy of each to Bloomington. H. Edina shall have, and has, full power and authority, for and on behalf of Edina and Bloomington, after consultation and concurrence of Bloomington, to negotiate, compromise, settle, or litigate any disputes of any kind with the Contractor, and surety on any:•bond obtained by Edina in connection with the contract with Contractor, or with any, other person or entity, arising out of or due ,to the awarding, interpreting, or enforcing of the contract with Contractor, any such bond, or the construction of the Joint Intersection Improvements. -5- I. All records kept by Bloomington and Edina with respect to the Intersection Improvements shall be subject to examination by the representatives of each at reasonable times. during normal business hours. J. The parties shall cause the Joint Intersection Improvements to be completed by December 1, 1998 or as soon as practicable thereafter if the required approval by Hennepin County is not received by a date which-' permits the Joint Intersection Improvements to be completed by such date. 7. Installation of Traffic Si =al at Gleason Road. A. Edina and Bloomington agree that at such time as the intersection of Gleason Road and W. 78th Street meets the traffic signal warrants which are required for State Aid funding Edina may install traffic signals at such intersection (the "Gleason Traffic Signals "). Edina may provide for the installation of such traffic signals if the intersection does not meet traffic signal warrants required for State Aid funding at its sole cost and expense and Bloomington shall not be responsible for the payment of any cost of the installation of the Gleason Traffic Signals in such event. The traffic signals shall be operated and maintained by Edina and Edina shall be responsible for all costs of operation thereof. B. Edina will prepare detailed final plans and specifications for the Gleason Traffic Signals and submit to Bloomington and the State Aid Engineer (if State Aid funding is to be utilized) for approval. 'Upon approval by Bloomington and the State Aid Engineer, Edina will advertise for bids for the installation of the Gleason Traffic Signals as one combined project, and will receive and open bids pursuant to .said advertisement. Once Edina has determined the bid to be accepted, Edina shall enter into a contract with such bidder, hereinafter referred to as "Contractor," at the unit prices specified in the bid of such bidder. The contract will be in the form required by the bidding documents prepared by Edina and will include the plans and specifications prepared by Edina and approved by Bloomington and the State Aid Engineer (if State Aid funding is to be utilized). All bonds obtained by Edina in connection with the contract shall name Edina only as the obligee. C. The installation of the Gleason Traffic Signals shall be under the supervision and direction of Edina. However, the Engineer of Bloomington shall cooperate with the Edina Engineer and his staff, at their request, -to the extent reasonably requested., but will have no responsibility for the. supervision of the installation of the Gleason Traffic Signals. D. If the intersection meets the traffic signal warrants which are required for State. Aid funding Bloomington shall pay to Edina, as Bloomington's share of the cost of the Gleason Traffic Signals, the total of the following amounts, hereinafter referred to as "Bloomington's Share ": i. 50% of the Construction Cost, as below defined; ii. 15% of i. above in this paragraph E, for engineering costs performed or incurred by. Edina. For purposes of this Section 6, Construction Costs shall mean and . include the total costs paid or incurred by Edina in connection with the installation of the Gleason Traffic Signals. E. Within sixty days after the date of the contract with Contractor, Bloomington shall pay to Edina 50% of Edina's then estimate of Bloomington's Share. The balance of Bloomington's Share shall be paid to Edina upon completion of the Gleason Traffic Signals, upon settlement of, or final judgment in, all disputes referred to in paragraph G hereof, and within 45 days after submittal to Bloomington of a Final Estimate for the cost of installation of the Gleason Traffic Signals prepared by Edina's Engineer. Any sums not paid when due hereunder, shall bear interest at 8% per annum, on the portion unpaid, from the due date until paid. F. If Bloomington is liable for the payment of any costs of the installation of the Cleason ,Traffic Signals, the, Edina Engineer shall prepare monthly estimates of the Construction Cost and shall deliver a_ copy. of each to Bloomington. G. Edina shall have, and has, full power and authority, for and on behalf of Edina and Bloomington, after consultation and concurrence of Bloom_ ington, to negotiate, compromise, settle, or. litigate any .disputes of any kind with the Contractor, and surety on any bond obtained by Edina in connection with the contract with Contractor, or, with any other person or entity, arising out of or due to the awarding, interpreting, or enforcing of the contract with Contractor, any such bond, or the installation of the Gleason Traffic Signals. H. All records kept by Bloomington and Edina with respect to the Gleason Traffic Signals shall be subject to examination by the representatives of each at, reasonable times. during norn1al busi.n.ess hours: 8. Landscaping Band for Liberty Property /DPS Development. In connection with the proposed office. to be undertaken by ]liberty Property in Bloomington south of W. 78th Street and west.of Cecilia Circle, a. landscaping plan -7- and schedule acceptable to Edina and in conformance with the requirements of Bloomington is required to be provided by Liberty Property to Bloomington together with a landscaping performance bond or other suitable security to be posted by Liberty Property with Bloomington: Said landscaping performance bond or other suitable security. is to guarantee the installation by Liberty Property of all plant_ materials and the vigorous growing condition thereof for two growing seasons. Bloomington agrees to draw on the landscaping performance bond or other suitable security if required to ensure the performance by Liberty Property of the requirements of the landscaping plan and schedule. 9. Review by Bloomington of Land Use Policies in Area of West 78th Street Corridor. A. As a part of updating its comprehensive municipal plan pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.355, Bloomington will review its land use policies in the area of the W. 78th Street Corridor, in particular the permitted density of a development in this area and its effect on the orderly flow of traffic on W. 78th Street and in the southwest area of Edina. Sanitary sewer service to property which is located in Bloomington in the area of the W. 78th Street Corridor is provided by Edina and the ability of Edina to provide such sanitary sewer to new development in Bloomington in such area is limited by the permitted capacity of Edina's sanitary sewer system. In reviewing its land use. policies in the area of the W. 78th Street Corridor and any proposed new development in such area, Bloomington shall also consider the effect of such policies and development on the capacity of the Edina sanitary sewer system. B. Bloomington and Edina agree that if additional development in the area of the W. 78th Street Corridor requires further roadway improvements to W. 78th Street beyond the improvements described herein in order to maintain an orderly flow of traffic in the W. 78th Street Corridor, they will jointly discuss and agree on the scope and extent of required roadway improvements to W. 78th Street and provide for an equitable sharing of the cost of such roadway improvements. 10. Separate Obligations and Responsibilities. Any and all employees of Bloomington and all other persons engaged by Bloomington in the performance of any work or services required, volunteered, or provided for herein to be performed by Bloomington in connection with improvements to the W:- 78th Street Corridor described herein shall not be considered employees of Edina, and that any and all claims that may or might arise under the Worker's Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf of said employees while so engaged, and any and all claims made by any third parties as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of said employees while so engaged on any of the work or services provided to be rendered herein shall in no way be the obligation or .responsibility of Edina. Also, any and all employees of Edina and all.other persons engaged by Edina in the performance of any work or services required or provided for herein to be performed by Edina shall not be considered employees of Bloomington, and that any and all claims that may or might arise under the Worker's Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf of said employees while so engaged, and any and all claims made by any third parties as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of said employees while so engaged on any of the work or services provided to be rendered. herein shall. in no_ way be the obligation or responsibility - of - Bloomington. T1. Change of Common Boundary. In order to facilitate improvements by Edina to W. 78th Street west of West Bush Lake Road and permit Edina to construct the Braemar Park frontage road referred to in Section 4. Edina .' And Bloomington agree to cooperate in order to change the common corporate., limits of Edina and Bloomington with the result that all of W. 78th Street which lies west of the west lot line of Lot 1, Block 1, Braemar Business Center and east of'T.H. 169 shall be located wholly in Edina. Edina and Bloomington shall 'submit to the/ Minnesota Municipal Board': the appropriate resolution. of its City Council required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 414.061 in connection with such change of common boundaries. 12. Notices. All notices, reports or demands required or permitted to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to be given when delivered personally to any officer of the party to which notice is being given, or when deposited in the United States mail in a sealed envelope, with registered or certified. mail postage prepaid thereon, addressed to the parties at the following addresses: To Edina: 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Attention: City Manager To Bloomington: 2215 West Old Shakopee Road Bloomington, Minnesota 55431 Attention: City,Manager Such addresses may be changed by either party upon notice to the other party given as herein provided. 91 IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be executed by their respective duly authorized officers as of the day and year first above written. CITY OF BLOOMINGTON By Mayor (SEAL) By City Manager CITY OF EDINA (SEAL) -10- By. By. Mayor City Manager Memo Date: 04/17/97 To: Mayor and Council Members From: Ken Rosland RE: West 781" Street Traffic Corridor - Edina Action The following items are Edina's commitment to the West 78"' Street Traffic Corridor and require action: 1. Pass a resolution to the Commissioner of Highways requesting a speed study on West 78'h Street. This would include the City of Bloomington, as the eastbound lanes are in Bloomington until one reaches the DPS property. 2. Pass a resolution that the Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn /DOT) expedite reconstruction of the East Bush Lake bridge over Interstate 494. 3. Direct staff to continue forward to develop a feasibility report for the next portion of construction on West 78h Street from Cecilia Circle to a point west of Gleason Road. 4. Direct staff to continue negotiations on obtaining right -of -way to construct the "Braemar" frontage road during the sale of land at the northeast comer of the 169/494 interchange. 5. Direct staff to develop the appropriate information for Municipal Board action to change City boundary west of the West 781i/West Bush Lake interchange so that the north frontage of 1-494 can be turned over to Edina. Then, Edina can request this roadway be placed on the state -aid system and thus be eligible for state -aid funds. 6. Direct staff to continue speed enforcement actions on West 781h Street and bring forward a proposal on the "speed" trailer for Council consideration. 7. Direct staff to continue neighborhood traffic analysis north of West 781" Street to establish "before DPS" and "after DPS" data base. 8. Direct staff to review the school bus safety options with the neighbors on Lochmere Terrace and Glasgow Drive prior to any construction on the West 78' Street right -of -way. 9. Directing staff to closely evaluate the Gleason Road/West 78`h Street signal warrants using projected DPS traffic being added to the system. If projected DPS traffic is enough to potentially justify a traffic signal, then complete signal justification report for Mn /DOT review. 10. Direct staff to work with Kraus - Anderson (DPS contractor) to minimize construction traffic impact on Edina neighbors and roadways. REPORT /RECOMMENDATION TO: Mayor & City Council From: Craig Larsen City Planner Date: April 21,1997 Subject: P -97 -2, Edina Properties. 3917 -3929 West 501h Street. Final Development Plan Recommendation: Agenda Item # Consent Information Only Mgr. Recommends Action II.B. The Planning Commission recommends Final Development Plan approval subject to: 1. Modification of plan to conform with Engineering Department recommendations 2. Payment of parking assessment for use of public parking 3. Development Agreement with HRA covering the canopy Info /Background: 501h and France Redevelopment Plan This site is identified as a redevelopment site in the plan. The plan provides for a redevelopment at a FAR of 1.5 supported by public parking. The proposed plan with a FAR of 1.43 complies with the plan. Zoning The Zoning Ordinance requires a parking variance be granted for all expansions in the 501h and France area even if the expansion was contemplated in the Redevelopment Plan. In this case the variance would be for 158 spaces. ❑ To H RA IN To Council ❑ Motion ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion The Planning Commission recommends Final Development Plan approval subject to: 1. Modification of plan to conform with Engineering Department recommendations 2. Payment of parking assessment for use of public parking 3. Development Agreement with HRA covering the canopy Info /Background: 501h and France Redevelopment Plan This site is identified as a redevelopment site in the plan. The plan provides for a redevelopment at a FAR of 1.5 supported by public parking. The proposed plan with a FAR of 1.43 complies with the plan. Zoning The Zoning Ordinance requires a parking variance be granted for all expansions in the 501h and France area even if the expansion was contemplated in the Redevelopment Plan. In this case the variance would be for 158 spaces. The proposed two level building complies with all other ordinance requirements. Parkin In order to increase available night time parking the 501h and France Parking Committee has decided to allow public parking in the "contract only" section of the south ramp after 6:00 p.m. This change will make 80 additional spaces available at night. . Attached to this report are several items related to parking availability and to parking demand generated by the theatre and the proposed expansion. First Cineplex has provided attendance figures for the theatre for the past year. The counts include weekdays and weekends and also include attendance figures for the Saturday following Thanksgiving. The parking utilization numbers are based on 2.5 persons per car. The Edina Zoning Ordinance uses three persons per car to calculate parking demand. Second, is a graph which tracks parking availability over a period of years. Counts taken during 1996 are consistent with those illustrated by the graph. Third, is a memo summarizing recent Saturday afternoon counts taken by City Staff. Staff will count again on Saturday, April 19, 1997 and report the findings at the Council meeting. CINEPLEX ODEON INFORMATION First Quarter Wednesday February 7 Film Name. Actual Attendance . Parking Utilization 4:00 -5:00 7:00 -8:00 1:30 -2:30 9:00 -10:00 4:00 -5:00 7:00 -8:00 - 9:00 -10:00 Juror 16 25 13 6 10 5 Juror 2 14 0 1 6 0 Black Sheep 2 28 5 1 11 2 12 Monkeys 0 23 7 0 9 3 Total 20 90 25 8 36 10 Film Name Projected Attendance Increase 235 Projected Additional Parking Utilization 321 4:00 -5:00 7:00 -8:00 94 9:00 -10:00 4:00 -5:00 7:00 -8:00 9:00 -10:00 Juror 9 15 8 4 6 3 Juror 1 .8 -0 0 3 0 Black Sheep 1 16 3 0 7 1 12 Monkeys 0 14 4 0 5 2 Total 12 53 15 5 21 6 Saturday January 6 Film Name Actual Attendance . Parking Utilization 1:30 -2:30 4:00 -5:00 7:00 -8:00 9:00 -10:00 1:30 -2 :30 4:00 -5:00 7:00 -8:00 9:00 -10:00 American President 41 76 201 66 16 30 80 26 _ Sabrina 103 171 317 105 41 68 127 42 Nixon 80 170 260 0 32 68 104 0 12 Monkeys 235 317 321 332 94 127 128 133 Total 459 734 1099 503 184 294 440 201 Film Name Projected Attendance Increase Projected Additional Parking Utilization 1:30 -2:30 4:00 -5:00 7:00 -8:00 9:00 -10:00 1:30 -2:30 4:00 -5:00 7:00 -8:00 9:00 -10:00 American President 24 45 118 39 10 18 47 16 Sabrina 61 101 187 - 62 24 40 75 25 Nixon 47 100 153 0 19 40 61 0 12 Monkeys 138 187 189 195 55 75 76 78 Total 270 432 647 296 108. 173 259 118 Edina Attendance 4/7/9' - '49 AM Wednesday May 15 Film Name Twister. , Primal Fear Twister Truth Cats Dogs Total Film Name Twister Primal Fear Twister Truth Cats Dogs Total Saturday June 15 Film Name Twister Mission Impossible Cable Guy Cable Guy Total Film -.Name Twister Mission Impossible Cable Guy Cable Guy Total Second Quarter Actual Attendance - Parking Utilization 1:10 -2:30 4:00 -5:00 7:00 -8:00 9:00 -10:00 1:10 -2:30 4:00 -5:00 7:00 -8:00 9:00 -10:00 37 39 108 63 15 16 43 25 14 1 21 0 6 .0- 8 0 21 48 91 0 8 19 36 0 0 7 40 6 0 3 16 2 72 95 260 69 29 38 104 28 Projected Attendance Increase Projected Additional Parking Utilization 1:10 -2:30 4:00 -5:00 7:00 -8:00 9:00 -10:00 •1:10 -2:30 4:00 -5:00 7:00 -8:00 9:00 -10 :00 22 23 64 37 9 9 25 15 8 1 12 0 3 0. 5 0 12 28 54 0 5 11' 21 0 0 4 24 4 0 2 9 1 .42 56 153 41 17 22 61 16 Actual Attendance Parking Utilization. 1:30 -2:30 4:00 -5:00 7:00 -8:00 9:00 -10:00 1:30 -2:30 4:00 -5:00 7:00 -8:00 9:00 -10:00 38 55 128 83 15.2 22 51.2 33.2 45 100 250 98 18 40 100 39.2 23 103 167 184 9.2 41.2' 66.8 73.6 40 73 66 0 16 29 26 0 146 331 611 365 58 132 244 146 Projected Attendance Increase - Projected Additional Parking Utilization 1:30 -2:30 4:00 -5:00 7:00 -8:00 9:00 -10:00 1:30 -2:30 4:00 -5:00 . 7:00 -8:00 9:00 -10:00 22 32 75 49 9 13 30 20 26 59 147 58 11 24 59 23 14 61 98 108 5 24 39 43 24 43 39 0 9 17 16 0 86 195 360 215 34 78 144 86 Edina Attendance 4/7/97 5:41 AM Third Quarter Wednesday August 28 Film Name Actual Attendance Parking Utilization 1:10 -2:30 4:00 -5:00 7:00 -8:00 9:00 -10:00 1:10 -2:30 4:00 -5:00 7:00 -8:00. 9:00 -10:00 Tin Cup 17 23 85 26 7 9 34 10 Matilda 29 3 0 0 12 1 0 0 Courage Under Fire 0 0 8 5 0 0 3 2 The Fan 7 6 17 2- 3 2 7 1 Dr, Moreau 12 17 55 17 5 7 22 7 Total 65 49 165 50 26 20 66 20 Film Name Projected Attendance Increase Projected Additional Parking Utilization 1:10 -2:30, 4:00 -5:00 7:00 -8:00 9:00 -10:00 1:10 -2:30 4:00 -5:00 7:00- 8:00 • 9:00 -10:00 Tin Cup 10 14 50 15 4 5 20 6 Matilda 17 2 0 0 7 1 0 0 Courage Under Fire 0 0 5 3 0 0 2 1 The Fan 4 4 10 1 2 1 4 0 Dr. Moreau 7 10 32 10 3 4 13 4 Total 38 29, 97 29 15 12 39 12 Saturday September 14 Film Name Actual Attendance Parking Utilization 1:30 -2:30 4:00 -5:00 7:00 -8:00 9:00 -10:00 1:30 -2:30 4:00 -5:00 7:00 -8:00 9:00 =10:00 Rich Man 10 49 122 49 4 20 49 20 Tin Cup 13 85 161 71 5 34 64 28 II Postino 16 - 49 230 90 6 20 92 36 Spitfire Grill 28 101 200 41 11 40 80 16 Total 67 284 713 251 26.8 114 285 100 Film Name Projected Attendance Increase Projected Additional Parking Utilization 1:30 -2 :30 4:00 -5:00 7 :00 -8 :00 9:00 -10:00 1:30 -2:30 . 4:00 -5:00 7:00 -8:00 -9:00 -10:00 Twister 6 29 72 29 2 12 29 12 Mission Impossible 8 SO 95 42 3 20 38 17 Cable Guy 9 29 135 53 4 12 54 21 Cable Guy 16 - 59 118 24 7 24 47 10 Total 39 167 420 148 16 67 168 59 Edina Attendance 4/7/' -:41 AM Fourth Quarter Wednesday November 7 Film Name Actual Attendance Parking Utilization 1:10 -2:30 4:00 -5:00 7:00 -8:00 9:00 -10:00 1:10 -2:30 4:00 -5:00 7:00 -8:00 9:00 -10:00 Dear God 0 0 8 6 0 0 3 2 1 st Wives 0 0 36 5 0 0 14 2 Sleepers 0 0 43 12 0 0 17 5 That Thing 0 0 11 3 0 0 4 1 Total 0 0 98 26 0 0 39 10 Film Name Projected Attendance Increase Projected Additional Parking Utilization 1:10 -2:30 4:00 -5:00 7:00 -8:00 9:00 -10:00 1:10 -2:30 4:00 -5:00 7:00 -8:00 9:00 -10:00 Dear God 0 0 5 4 0 0 2 1 1 st Wives 0 0 21 3 0 0 8 1 Sleepers 0 0 25 7 0 0 10 3 That Thing 0 0 6 2 0 0 3 1 Total 0 0 58 15 0 0 23 6 Saturday November 30 Film Name Actual Attendance Parking Utilization 1:30 -2 :30 4:00 -5:00 7 :00 -8:00 9:00 -10:00 1:30 -2:30 4:00 -5:00 7:00 -8:00 9:00 -10:00 Star Trek 8 155 145 146 49 62 58 58 20 Jingle 141 259 255 71 56 104 102 28 Ransom 126 153 232 90 50 61 93 36 Star Trek 8 83 169 170 41 33 68 68 16 Total 505 726 803 251 202 290 321 100 Film Name Projected Attendance Increase Projected Additional Parking Utilization 1:30 -2:30 4:00 -5:00 7:00 -8:00 9:00 -10:00 1:30 -2:30 4:00 -5:00 7:00 -8:00 9:00 -10:00 Star Trek 8 91 85 86 29 36 34 34 12 Jingle 83 152 150 42 33 61 60 17 Ransom 74 90 137 53 30 36 55 21 Star Trek 8 49 99 100 24 20 40 40 10 Total 297 427 473 148 119 171 189 59 Edina Attendance 4/7/97 5:41 AM P 350 gme- ■ PEAK JULY 94 300 U) w U 250 0-200 150 Q U 100 ;Q 50 gme- ■ PEAK JULY 94 City of Edina: Memo To: Craig Larsen From: Kris Aaker Date: April 18, 1997 Re: 50`h and France Avenue Municipal Parking Pursuant to your request, monitoring of the municipal parking at 50th and France was conducted on weekends to establish patterns of use. This survey was begun March 1, 1997, with data accumulated through April 12, 1997. The survey was conducted in response to concerns raised by the Planning Commission regarding the proposed theatre expansion and the parking need that would be created. Staff focused on Saturday when both retail and theatre use would be operating. The survey included all three municipal ramps and the 49'/2 Street surface lot. A spread sheet showing the date, time and number of cars in each lot was complied. The data from this. spread sheet was then calculated to show the average and percentage of occupancy in each lot in two time periods; before 4:00 p.m., and 4:00 p.m. or later. Parking on Saturdays Surveyed Before 4:00 4:00 or Later • Page 1 a [.:: : :,: :::C ..... Avail Occ. NORTH RAMP> 3$;::«:::: >: >: >:::93:;:<;:;:;:;:::6 .:...... %::;:> 104 69% ° 46 40% MIDDLE RAMP ><' 0><`><::::: /o:: <:::::::::::<<:;::: >:: >::$" :::: 7/o 100 ° 36 /0 171 o 64 /o SOUTH RAMP '[7Q 4 /0 ::..x:9 °I:::::. 305 34% 576 65% TOTALS: 305 34% 576 : ti5 %a: 388 44% 494 56% • Page 1 It become apparent when reviewing parking figures that between 1:00 -4:00 p.m., on Saturdays parking demand peaks. After 4:00 p.m., parking demand decreases in all areas. The middle ramp appears to be the most heavily used throughout the day. The north ramp is used quite heavily between 1:00 -4:00, however, use decreased dramatically after 4:00 p.m. The south ramp appears to have steady use in the afternoon and in the evening. All ramps functioned at below capacity with an average number of approximately 313 parking spaces available before 4:00 p.m., and approximately 394 parking spaces available after 4:00 p.m. spread throughout all three ramps. Total parking provided by municipal lots and surface parking is 881 spaces. In reviewing parking demand after 4:00 p.m., space availability increases as the evening progresses. It was observed that parking on the top level of all three ramps was sparse with the south and north ramp having few if any cars parking on the top level at any given time of day. • Page 2 BENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES, INC. TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS 7301 OHMS LANE. SUITE 500/ EDINA, MN 55439/ (612) 832 -9858 /FAX (612) 832 -9564. February 15, 1996 REFER TO FILE: 96 -02 MEMORANDUM TO: -Tim Kerrigan, City of Hopkins FROM: Tun Benshdef—and Ed. Terh RE: Traffic and Parking Analysis Results for the Proposed Theater and Arts Facility Developments PURPOSE This memorandum is to present the results of our traffic and parking analysis for the proposed theater and arts facility developments. The purpose of our work has been to address questions that have been raised about the effects the proposed developments will have on traffic and parking operations. In addition to comprehensive technical analyses, our work included contacts with several business owners hi the area to listen to their concerns and ideas for meeting the traffic and parking needs for the proposed developments. The two principal questions we have addressed in this study are: 1) Do the downtown traffic and parking systems provide sufficient capacity to accommodate the proposed theater complex and arts facility? 2) If the answer to the first question is yes, what management measures should be implemented to effectively meet the traffic and parking needs for the proposed developments and to avoid adverse impacts on nearby existing uses? The traffic and parking analysis results presented in this memorandum are organized as follows: 1) Background Information 2) Traffic Implications 3) Parking Implications 4) Conclusions Mr. Jim Kerrigan -2- February '15, 1996 BACKGROUND INFORMATION Project Information The two different developments presently being proposed are a movie theater /restaurant/ retail complex on the south side of Main St. between 11 th and 12th Avenues and a performing arts facility on the north side of Main St., between 11 th and 12th Avenues. The proposed locations are shown in Figure 1. The current site plan shows a 6 screen, 1,730 seat movie theater, a 5,000 sq. ft. sit down restaurant and -3,000 sq. ft. retail space in the J development south of Main St. The site plan for this development also shows 64 parking spaces on -site. The performing arts facility is expected to contain a 750 seat stage area, a 125 seat meeting room, and various classrooms and practice areas. It is expected the performing arts facility will have no on -site parking spaces. TRAFFIC IMPLICATIONS Existing Conditions To determine existing traffic conditions in the area, Benshcoof staff performed traffic counts at the Main St. /10th Ave., Main St. /11th Ave., and Main St. /12th Ave. - intersections. Traffic data was collected during the 4-6 p.m. peak period on Tuesday, January 23, 1996 and 11 -2 p.m. on Saturday, January 21, 1.996. Traffic Forecasts Trip generation projections for the proposed developments were established for the 'following three time periods: weekday p.m. peak hour, Friday evening, and Saturday mid- day. The number of trips generated by the proposed theater development were, determined based on information published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. The number of trips generated by the proposed arts facility were determined based on the seating capacity. The number of seats expected to be used during each time period was divided by a vehicle occupancy of 3.0 to determine the total number of entering and exiting trips. The 3.0 vehicle occupancy is typical for a family oriented use such as the arts facility. The resultant number of trips are shown in Table 1. SER vICE' UH 4f, v �f r �. ° z z ��H w •s .4 // aJ� z �Ilh ST. N. t,w \ \. �c ui z -. � IIJ r / � W Ul - jnd a I� ° F-- > _-_ IL -S� N ....._... 2nU STj PROPOSED r I J `�f ARTS ►i Lu ? FACILITY ` PROPOSED THEATER f �• n i'l " r COMPLEX AIN �, W r � , lu :y 1 (if d Q �' 4) Lu - N t'o c�� Central rk - Moll r 1 i A�ii ind ? !jf. �' _Y/'^ ICI Si �! 1 I w Ilk— - N SCALE -- — — - I t 0 800' FIGURE 1 CITY OF HOPKINS TRAFFIC AND PARKING STUDY FOR ARTS LOCATIONS FOR FACILITY AND PROPOSED ARTS �BENSHOOF&A=IATES,INC. THEATER COMPLEX FACILITY AND TRAM9PDRTATIDNEMDINEERSANDPLANNER! THEATER COMPLEX Mr. Jim Kerrigan -4- February 15, 1996 Friday Evening (9 to 10 p.m.) TABLE 1 Trip Ends Use In TRIP GENERATION PROJECTIONS In Out Weekday P.M. Peak Hour (4:30 to 5:30 p.m.) 37.17 /screen 24.0 /screen 223 Trip Generation Rate Trip Ends Use In Out In Out Movie Theater 15.67 /screen 6.83 /screen 94 41 Restaurant 6.4/1000 s.f. 5.2/1000 s.f. 32 26 Retail • 6.67/1000 s. f. 5.0/1000 s. f. 20 15 Arts Facility 0.048 /seat 0.074 /seat 42 65 Totals 188 147 Friday Evening (9 to 10 p.m.) Saturday Mid -Day (1 to 2 p.m.) Trip Generation Rate Trip Ends Use In Out In Out Movie Theater 37.17 /screen 24.0 /screen 223 144 Restaurant 6.4/1000 s.f. 7.0/1000 s.f. 32 35 Retail 6.67/1000 s.f. 7.0/1000 s.f. 20 21 Arts Facility 0.088 /seat 0.31 /seat 77 271 . Totals 352 471 Saturday Mid -Day (1 to 2 p.m.) Trip Generation Rate Trip Ends Use In Out In Out Movie Theater 26.83 /screen 19.0 /screen 161 114 Restaurant 4.8/1000 s.f. 5.2/1000 s.f. 24 26 Retail 6.67/1000 s.f. 7.0/1000 s.f. 20 21 0.31 /seat 0.088 /seat 271 77 Totals 476 238 Mr. Jim Kerrigan -5- February 15, 1996 Figure 2 shows the trip distribution percentages for the trips generated by the proposed developments. These percentages are based on the expected origins and destinations of customers that would make trips to the, developments. Using these percentages, the trips generated by the proposed developments were assigned to the surrounding roadways. Traffic volumes were projected for the existing and post- development conditions at the 10th , 11th and 12th Avenue intersections with Main St. for the following time periods: weekday p.m. peak hour (4:30 to 5:30 p.m.), Friday evening (9 to 10 p.m.), and Saturday mid -day (1 to 2 p.m.). These volume projections account for existing volumes plus a three percent background growth in these volumes plus the new trips generated by the proposed developments. For traffic analysis purposes, we examined four principal criteria: • Ability of the following three intersections to adequately accommodate the projected post - development volumes: Main St. /10th Ave., Main St. /11th Ave., and Main St. /12th Ave. • Adequacy of traffic movements along 10th and 11th Avenues south of Main St. • Provisions for customer drop off and pick up • Safety and convenience for pedestrian movements to and from the theater complex and arts facility' Figure 3 illustrates the intersections and roadways most affected by the proposed developments. From an intersection capacity standpoint, we found that all three intersections will be able to effectively accommodate the projected post - development volumes, All three intersections will operate at level of service C or better during each of the three analyses time periods: Friday evening, Saturday afternoon, and Saturday evening. This level of service involves limited delay and fully meets applicable engineering standards. The next step is to address the adequacy of traffic movements along 10th and 11th Avenues south of Main St. Between Main St. and 1st St. S., 11th Ave. is 44 feet wide with one lane of traffic in each direction plus parking on the west side. South of 1st St. S., 11th Ave. soon will be upgraded in conjunction with the County Hwy. 3 project to provide two traffic lanes in each direction. Our analyses have shown that the segment of 11th Ave. between Main St. and 1st St. S. is of sufficient width to accommodate the projected traffic volumes. (;BZENtMF TY OF HOPKINS TRAFFIC AND PARKING FIGURE 2 STUDY FACILITY AND TRIP DISTRIBUTION IF a ASSOCIATES, INC. THEATER COMPLEX PERCENTAGES ATION ENGINEERSANOPLANNERS - - .. - ■ I ) 1 L CITY OF HOPKINS gENMF & ASSOCIATES, INC. TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS TRAFFIC AND PARKING STUDY FOR ARTS FACILITY AND THEATER COMPLEX SCALE 0 'W FIGURE 3 t ROADWAYS AND INTERSECTIONS MOST AFFECTED BY PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Mr. Tun Kerrigan -8- February 15, 1996 To enhance operations along 11th Ave. south of Main St., we would suggest the following two changes: • Stripe a second northbound lane from 1st St. S. to Main St. in order to provide increased capacity and northbound traffic continuity. • Remove the parking on the west side of 11th Ave. from Main St. to the south boundary of the theater development. This change will serve three purposes: improve visibility for pedestrian safety, increase maneuvering space for southbound traffic entering the parking ramp or theater parking lot and provide space for drop off/pick up activities on the west side of 11th Ave. Regarding 10th Avenue, we believe that traffic volumes will increase significantly along the block between Main St. and 1st St..S. due to theater and arts facility customers using the parking ramp. With this increased traffic use, we believe that safety.problems likely would arise regarding the existing angle parking on the west side of 10th Ave. between Main St. and the alley to the south. The two principal safety issues are that parked vehicles back up into the southbound traffic stream and that the parked vehicles restrict sight distance for motorists entering 10th Ave. from the west on the alley or the parking ramp exit. To resolve this problem, the angle spaces should be restriped to parallel spaces. This action will reduce the number of spaces on this portion of 10th Ave. from the existing 11 angle spaces to about five parallel spaces. We are confident that sufficient other spaces are available nearby on 10th Ave. and Main St. to offset this six space reduction. For the proposed types of uses, we believe that a significant amount of customers drop off/pick up activity will occur. Provisions for such activity need to be made near the front doors for the theater and arts facility. From the standpoint of pedestrian movements, it is important that persons walking to and from the theater complex and arts facility be accommodated with a high level of safety and convenience. To achieve this outcome,. it is important that pedestrians be encouraged to use public sidewalks and established crosswalks at intersections. With the expected significant use of the parking ramp and other public parking cast of 11th Ave., we expect a major concentration of pedestrian movements at the intersection of Main St. and 11 th Ave. To provide adequate safety for this high volume of pedestrian movements, we would recommend that a "no turn on red" restriction be applied to all four approaches to this intersection. Mr. Jim Kerrigan -9- February 15, 1996 From the preceding considerations, our overall recommended plan for the Main St. /11th Ave. intersection area is shown in Figure 4. Major features shown in this plan include: • Two northbound lanes on 11 th Ave., for which the right lane serves right turns only at Main St. • "No Turn on Red" restriction on all four approaches to the Main St. /11th Ave. intersection - - • Short right turn lanes on the.west and north legs of the intersection to enhance traffic movements and to offset the capacity reduction from prohibiting right turns on red • Drop ofl;Ypick up zones on the north and south sides of Main St. between 11th and 12th Avenues PARKING Il"LICATIONS As a first step in the parking analysis, it is important to identify the primary parking impact area for the theater complex and arts facility. For definitional purposes, the primary parking impact area means the area that will be most affected by parking for the new developments and the area which involves walking distances that customers would find acceptable. Based on our related experiences, on other parking studies for downtown Hopkins, and on other research, we have established the primary parking impact area as an 800 foot radius circle from the center of the block on Main St. between 11th and 12th Avenues (see Figure 5). One recent article' has indicated that this 800 foot walking distance will provide level of service B (effective performance) for outdoor, uncovered parking- The next step is to establish the public parking supply that will exist in the primary impact area upon completion of the theater complex and arts facility. Accounting for existing conditions plus a few changes that would be expected by the time the new developments are open, this total available public parking supply is shown in Figure 6. As indicated, the total number of spaces is 1,133. For conservative purposes, it is important to note that this supply does not include the City Hall parking lot (which is just outside the 800 foot ring), the St. Joseph's lot, or the library lot. '"How Far Should Parkers Have to Walk -" Parkin ¢: Mary S. Smith and Thomas A. Butcher, September 1994, p. 29 SCALE I • - BUILDING ENTRANCE Ulf I I I CITY OF HOEETRAFFIC FIGURE 4 . AND PARKING UDY FOR ARTS RECOMMENDED PLAN ACILITY AND FOR MAIN STJ11TH AV . BMW a ATER COMPLEX INTERSECTION TRANSPORTATION E I - ••- J q t f L 800 FT. RADIUS; WALKING TIME TO THEATER IS 3 -31h MINUTES L� J d - 1 St ST t LOT LOT 600 +- #500 ARTS FACILITY I . to THEATER COMPLEX LOT # 300 Zit RAMP > > li.l � lA.! s7 S. Cenlrol City Pork `' Holl 2nd s N SCALE 0 400' CITY OF HOPKINS TRAFFIC AND PARKIN(a FIGURE 5 STUDY FOR ARTS FACILITY AND PRIMARY PARKING BENSHOOF�ASSOCIATES,INC. THEATER COMPLEX IMPACT AREA TRANBPORTATiONENGINEERSANDPLANNER8 Est t � y - Cen,lral Pork LEGEND im� id ti 1 ['y(' <YYYYYY 1'S Illilllllllllll IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII� C)�OKX. ppppp IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII .IUlllunllllllll x 111111 ' ' ' a 1 \ � IIIIIIII�IIIIIIIII�Aq _ OKXXX ,r - 3 HOUR (669 SPACES) '.•:: .2 HOUR (247 SPACES) ® - 1 HOUR (69 SPACES) TOTAL SUPPLY IS 1,133 SPACES ®- UNRESTRICTED (148 SPACES) L N SCALE 0 400' FIGURE s FCI OF HOPKINS TRAFFIC AND PARKING STUDY FOR ARTS FUTURE PUBLIC FACILITY AND HQOF8IASSOC IATES,INC. THEATER COMPLEX pPARKING SUPPLY ORTATION ENOINEERSANDPLANNERS BY TIME LIMIT Mr. Tim Kerrigan -13- February 15, 1996 Next, it is, important to identify spaces within the primary impact area which should not be used by customers of the theater complex or arts facility. Based on our understanding of downtown area land uses and parking needs, we have determined that customers of the new developments should be discouraged from using the spaces shown in Figure 7. The three particular categories of spaces shown in Figure 7 and a brief explanation of each are as follows: • On- street parking on 12th Ave. north of the arts facility and on 11th Ave. north of 1 st St. N.. These are residential areas, and the parking should primarily be limited to the residents and their visitors. • Lot #500. This lot is needed for adjacent businesses. Theater and arts facility customers would practically fill the lot unless controls were established. • On- street parking on Main St. and on 10th Ave. just north and south of Main St. These spaces are needed for nearby businesses during daytime and early evening hours on Monday through Saturday. The summation of all spaces shown in Figure 7 is 227 spaces. Another note shown in the figure is that on -street parking by theater and arts facility customers also should be discouraged in residential areas north and south of the primary impact area. The next step is to project the parking demand for theater complex and arts facility. To accomplish this effort, we have utilized several sources of information, including: prior studies that we have performed, information from Mann Theaters, data published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, and data published by the Urban Land Institute. Our analysis and the resultant parking demand projections are shown in Table 2. As indicated, the peak parking demand for the new developments is projected to be 673 spaces on a Saturday evening, with the next two busiest periods being 664 spaces on a Friday evening and 465 spaces on a Saturday afternoon. It should be noted that these projections assume that all of the uses will have a busy level of activity. The next item in our analysis was to add these new parking demand projections to the existing parking usage levels and, then, to correlate this resultant total parking demand to the available spaces. The results of this tabulation are shown in Figure 8. As shown, the parking supply, even after removing the 227 spaces shown on Figure 7 which should not be used by theater or arts facility customers, is greater than the total parking demand during all three time periods. In order to achieve the type of parking outcome represented by Figure 8, in which the theater and arts facility customers are effectively accommodated and no significant negative impacts are caused for other property owners, we believe that the City needs to implement a series of parking management measures. One recommended action, shown in Figure 9, is that the City should change the time limit for most regulated on- street parking in the primary impact area from two hours to three hours. This change is needed to accommodate theater or arts facility customers who come for a matinee performance. • Vi d 1 St S.T. N. t w LOT En �t co ARTS FACILfTY IN THEATER COMPLEX LOT p 300 4j RAMP > IF W (%) Q +- tLi 11j TO 4 c 5l > Cep traI OD Pork Roll 2nd I __�. /r✓ N NOTES: • TOTAL NUMBER OF SPACES WHERE THEATER PARKING SHOULD BE DISCOURAGED IS 227 SPACES SCALE • THEATER PARKING ALSO SHOULD BE DISCOURAGED IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS NORTH AND SOUTH OF THE PRIMARY IMPACT AREA C' FIGURE 7 CITY OF HOPKINS TRAFFIC AND PARKING STUDY FOR ARTS' AREAS IN WHICH FACILITY AND THEATER PARKING BMW & ASSOCIATES, INC. THEATER COMPLEX SHOULD BE STRONGLY TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS DISCOURAGED TABLE 2 PROJECTED PARKING DEMAND FOR THEATER COMPLEX AND ARTS FACILITY PARKING DEMAND ON A BUSY FRIDAY Type of Land Use Size (sq ft) Gross Parking Rate Adjustment Factor for Walking, Transit, Multi- Purpose Time of Day Factor Net Parking Needs Net arking Needs 8 am- 11 am 11 am- 2 pm 2 pm- 4 pm 4 pm- 6 pm 6 pm- 9 pm 8 am- 11 am 11 am- 2 pm 2 pm- 4 pm 4 pm- 6 pm 6 pm- 9 pm Retail-general 3000 4.51 15% 67% - % o , 0 8 11 11 10 9 Restaurant w/ liquor 5000 20/1000 15% 10% 100% 30% 90% 90% 9 85 26 77 77 Theatre 1730 seats 025 per seat 15% 0% 0% 10% 75% 100% 0 0 37 276 368 Performing Arts Center -daytime 750 seats 0.05 per seat 0% 100% 100% 10% 0% 0% 38 38 4 0 0 Performing Arts Center -evening 750 seats 0.33 Per seat 15% 0% 0% 0% 10% 100% 0 0 0 21 210 TOTAL PARKING DEMAND 55 134 78 384 664 PARKING DEMAND ON A BUSY SATURDAY Type of Land Use Size (sq ft) Gross Parking Rate Adjustment Factor for Walking, Transit, Mufti- Purpose Time of Day Factor Net Parking Needs by Time of Da 8 am- 11 am 11 am- 2 pm 2 pm- 4 pm 4 pm- 6 pm 6 pm- 9 pm 8 am- 11 am 11 am- 2 pm 2 pm- 4 pm 4 pm- 6 pm 6 pm- 9 pm Retail-general 3000 4.511000 15% 67% 100% 100% 90% % 8 11 11 10 10 Restaurant w/ liquor 5000 20/1000 15% 10% 70% 45% 90% 100% 9 .60 38 77 85 Theatre 1730 seats 025 per seat 15% 0% 50 %. 70% 75% 100% 0 184 257 276 368 Performing Arts Center 750 seats I 0.33 per seat 15% 100% 100% 50% 10% 100% 210 105 21 210 TOTAL PARKING DEMAND 1 227 465 411 384 673 �6ZII1 '1. 0 ::� FRIDAY EVENING SATURDAY AFTERNOON LEGEND �1. SATURDAY EVENING ® NET PARKING SUPPLY AVAILABLE FOR THEATER AND ARTS FACILITY CUSTOMERS (TOTAL SUPPLY OF 1,133 SPACES MINUS 227 SPACES THAT SHOULD NOT BE USED) - EXISTING PARKING DEMAND ®- ADDITIONAL PARKING DEMAND DUE TO THEATER COMPLEX AND ARTS FACILITY FIGURE 8 CITY OF HOPKINS TRAFFIC AND.PARKING STUDY FOR ARTS PARKING SUPPLY AND FACILITY AND DEMAND ANALYSIS BENSHOOF 8 ASSOCIATES, INC. THEATER COMPLEX WITHIN PRIMARY TRANSPORTATIONENOINEERSANOPLANNERS I M PACT AREA 1st t L ism- Centrol Pork LEGEND ui d N. ao >. Li.i Ist v a S. �v City -- m Holl 2nd - CHANGE TO 3 HOURS 8 AM - 6 PM, SEVEN DAYS PER WEEK L ao SCALE _._.. 1 4w, L CITY OF.HOPKINS FIGURE 9 TRAFFIC AND PARKING STUDY FOR ARTS RECOMMENDED FACILITY AND IFINNSMF&A=IATES,INC. THEATER COMPLEX PARKING TIME TRANSPORTATION ENSINEERS AND PLANNERS LIMIT CHANGES Mr. Jim Kerrigan -18- February 15, 1996 Other primary parking management measures that should be implemented are as follows: a) Install signs at the entrances to lot #500 indicating that theater parking is prohibited b) Receive input from businesses along Main St. east of 11th Ave. to determine whether any changes are needed to existing parking regulations along this street c) Provide information at movie theater and Arts Facility to inform patrons about where to park, e.g. use of "trailer" on movie screens d) Use other media, such as local newspaper and communications from Downtown Business Association; to educate theater and arts facility customers on where to park e) Install hardware in parking ramp to inform motorists when it is full and to provide information on alternative parking sites f) Implement design features to strengthen linkage between theater complex and parking ramp g) Improve pedestrian connection between Lot #300 and theater complex In addition to the above management measures that we would recommend be implemented in conjunction with initial opening of the theater complex, we have identified several other contingency measures. We believe that it is important for the City to have other such measures available for possible implementation in the event that unexpected difficulties arise. Particular contingency measures that we believe are important for this situation are: a) Potential additional exit from the parking ramp to 11th Ave. We understand that the parking ramp design allows for a possible exit to 1 lth Ave. near the northwest corner of the-facility. This option would be important to consider if congestion occurs on 10th Ave. or on the parking ramp exit to 10th Ave. b) Arrangements for theater customers to use the St. Joseph's parking lot and/or the library lot. This could be pursued if needs arise and if the'theater use would not conflict with existing uses for those parking lots. c) Change the parking time limit for lot #500 from the existing three hours to one or one and a half hours. This action would be important if the recommended signing to prevent theater customers from using lot #500 is not sufficient to preserve use of this lot for customers of nearby businesses. Mr. Tim Kerrigan -19- February 15, 1996 d) Establishment of residential parking permit program. If operating experiences indicate that parking by theater customers causes negative impacts on residential streets, the City should consider implementing this type of program in the impacted area to eliminate the problem. e) Establishment of a management program to meet theater parking needs, without causing adverse impacts for other users, for weekday matinee performances. This will be important if weekday matinee showings are scheduled and if they attract significant patronage. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLEMENTATION RECOMMENDATIONS Principal conclusions that we have established through the analyses presented in this memorandum are: a) The downtown roadway system will be able to effectively accommodate the increased traffic associated with the proposed theater complex and arts facility provided that the following operational changes are implemented: — Striping of parallel parking spaces on the west side of 10th Ave. between Main St. and the alley to the south instead of the existing angle spaces — Traffic signing and marking plan shown in Figure 4 for the Main StJI lth Ave. intersection area b) The downtown public parking system will be able to effectively accommodate customers for the theater complex and arts facility provided that the series of management measures recommended in this report are implemented. c) The City should retain the contingency measures described in this report as possible mitigation actions in the event that unexpected difficulties arise. Specific implementation steps that we recommend are as follows: 1) Before theater complex opens la) City and developer establish a plan to educate customers on where to park lb) Stripe the existing parking lot on the future arts facility site Mr. Jim Kerrigan -20- February 15, 1996 2) In conjunction with theater opening 2a) Change time limits for on- street parking shown in Figure 9 from two hours to three hours 2b) Install signs at the entrances to lot #500 prohibiting use of this lot for theater customers 2c) Install appropriate hardware and signing at the entrance to the parking ramp to inform users when this facility is full 2d) Implement the recommended traffic plan for the Main St. /11th Ave. intersection area, including appropriate traffic signs and pavement markings 2e) Restripe from angle to parallel parking the existing spaces on the west side of 10th Ave. between Main St. and the alley to the south. 2fj Implement the public information and communications plan established in step 1 a) 3) After theater opens 3a) Monitor traffic and parking operations and make adjustments as needed PETITION TO CITY OF EDINA The undersigned merchants in the vicinity.of 50th Street and France Avenue South oppose the proposed Edina Properties Final Development Plan, 3917 -3929 West 50th Street. This proposal is too large and too high, causing high,people density which will cause heavy congestion, and a real shortage of parking. This proposal defeats the fundamental business purpose for the creation of public parking fundamentally for the purpose of encouraging and accomodating business invitees., The proposed plan will encourage. parking in all, ramps to the detriment of businees invitees and merchants. in the vicinity who are assessed, in part, the cost of the_xamps. 1 71 f 7A Firm me �7v B Y �'v L -Q� 'n 4 Its 'v Dated Y-1 V- J:7 ,1997 F i r Mme By ` Its Dated: `1-I IVI 1'1 / 1 , 1997. Firm Name By l• Its /n t Dated: A&Y m , 1997. Ir- Firm Name _ n� B y.. c I t Dated: ,1997. D. 11997. -firm Nam'e- 1997. Ti.% Y s�1 �L16C! 1 C�CS i! :.N V,C , Firm Name Firm Name ,l BY B i L Y I s W Its c��,�� r Dated': t g'1 , 1997 . Dated `i 7 , 1997 . PETITION TO CITY OF EDINA ----------- - - - - -- The undersigned merchants in the vicinity of 50th Street and France Avenue South op "pose the proposed Edina Properties Final Development Plari, 3917 -3929 West 50th Street. This proposal is too large and too high, causing high people density which will cause heavy congestion.and This proposal defeats the fundamental creation of public parking fundamental encouraging and accomodating business will encourage parking in all ramps to invitees and merchants in the vicinity the cost of the ramps. �2 F i r Name r - Its Dated 0 ,1997. J F i r Naie B y :� 17 G - L� V�d b - �- Its —� Dated: / y ,1997. Dated: /D ,1997 a real shortage of parking. business purpose for the ly for the purpose of invitees. The proposed plan the detriment of businees who are assessed, in part, Dated: 1-/ - /i7 ' e7 ") ,1997. W F Firm Name�//Cad- I y ts Dated: &-eC. ,1997. Firm Name B y Its Dated: ,1997. Firm Name Firm Name By By VV�-e I t s ' 'j - I t s M 10ru eo Dated:�,�oc -� ,1997. Dated ��-'l�'�1� ,1997. r PETITION TO CITY OF EDINA The undersigned merchants in the vicinity of 50th Street and France Avenue South oppose the proposed Edina Properties Final Development Plan, 3917 -3929 West 50th Street. This proposal is too large and too high, causing high people density which will cause heavy congestion,and a real shortage of parking. This proposal defeats the fundamental business purpose for the creation of public parking fundamentally for the purpose of encouraging and accomodating business invitees. The proposed plan will encourage parking in all ramps to the detriment of business invitees and merchants in the vicinity who are assessed, in part, the cost of the ramps. 2�w 74- A,,,W Firm Name By r Its 1 Dated: ��7 ,1997. F i r Na e y � Dated: ! 9 ,1997. Firm Name) By I t s Dated: -X/1/1 4 11997. Firm Name By Its Dated: Firm Name Firm Name By By Its Dated: Firm Name By Its Its ,1997. ,1997. Dated: ,1997. Dated: 11.997. Firm Name By Its Dated: ,199'7. !P PETITION TO CITY OF EDINA --------------- -- The undersigned merchants in the vicinity of 50th Street and France Avenue South oppose the proposed Edina Properties Final Development Plan, 3917- 3929.West 50th Street. This proposal is too large and too high, causing high people density which will cause heavy congestion.and a real shortage of parking. This proposal defeats the fundamental business purpose for the creation of public parking fundamentally for the purpose of encouraging and accomodating business invitees. The proposed plan will encourage parking in all ramps to the detriment of business invitees and merchants in the vicinity who.are assessed, in part, the cost of the ramps. F i r N me Firm Name By By I t s C.-1 r--P 'N I t s Dated: L-f-'_ 4 =y1 ,1997. Dated: ,1997. J' A Firm Name By.���,z.,/ Its '1014JA ?V Dated: 7 ,1997. S��Ierd�ck F i r NNalne� ' By 5X /� Its In/vvA r Dated: � / 1 , 1997. Firm Name By Its Firm Name By Its Dated: Firm Name By Its Dated: Firm Name ,1997. ,1997. By - Its Dated: ,1997. Dated: 11997• PETITION TO CITY OF EDINA The undersigned merchants in the vicinity of 50th Street and France Avenue South oppose the proposed Edina Properties Final Development Plan, 3917 -3929 West 50th Street. This proposal is too large and to.o high, causing high people density which will cause heavy congestion.and a real shortage of parking. This proposal defeats the fundamental business purpose for the creation.of public parking fundamentally for the purpose o.f encouraging and accomodating business invitees. The proposed plan will encourage par-king in all ramps to the detriment of businees invitees and merchants in the vicinity who are assessed, in part, the cost of the ramps. Firm Name Firm Name B y c / ✓� �r� r-/ g y �� I t s 77 'P 7—'7 I t s Dated: " %f'�k V ,1997. Dated: �/' /D-/�'�% ,1997. n , Firm Name B y _. I t s s�itc3 �rf Dated: �/�� 11997 Firm Name By .s - Its Dated: ,1997 t / / � . "�6 _-Z e.,,- A", W Firm Name Its J 199 7. Dr. i C h Ct L r � , � U ✓1Q Firm Name By K � I t s Dated: ,1997. Dated: U i ,1997. Firm Name By o Its s Dated: r. I REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: Craig Larsen City Planner Date: April 21,1997 Subject: Final Rezoning, R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District to PRD -1, Planned Residence District. The Philip Stephen Company. Olde Vernon. Recommendation: Agenda Item #ii. c. & D. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA D To Council Action ❑ Motion ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion The Planning Commission recommends Final Rezoning and Final Plat approval subject to: 1. Developers Agreement with security 2. Landscaping Bond 3. Acceptance as Subdivision Dedication a Conservation Restriction over all land within 100 feet of Hawkes Lake and over all land north and east of the lake. Info /Background: See attached Planning Commission Minutes, Staff Report, and plans. DRAFT MINUTES P.C. MEETING APRIL 2, 1997 H. OLD BUSINESS: Z -96 -3 Final Rezoning, R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District to PRD -1, Planned Residence District. The Philip Stephen Company S -96 -5 Final Plat Approval. Olde Vernon. The Philip Stephen Company General Location: South of Vernon Avenue and East of Olinger Road Mr. Larsen informed the Commission the City Council granted Preliminary Rezoning approval for a 26 unit townhouse development of this property on October 7, 1996. The Commission will recall the developer had proposed a development of 32 units. The Council, in granting preliminary approval did not specify how the unit reduction should be handled. The developer presented a revised plan illustrating 26 units to the Council on January 21, 1997. Mr. Larsen explained the developer has now prepared final plans and is requesting Final Rezoning and Final Plat approval. The primary change in the development plan is that all 26 units are detached, whereas, the preliminary plan illustrated all two unit buildings. The development plan continues the townhouse concept with individual ownership 'of house pads and common ownership of all other areas, including the road. Mr. Larsen pointed out the proposed Final Plans conform to all requirements of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances, including the required 100 foot setback from Hawkes Lake. In response to con .cerns `raised by the Council additional guest parking has been added to the development. The proposed landscaping plan exceeds ordinance requirements both in terms of sizes and amount of plantings. Mr. Larsen concluded staff recommends Final Rezoning and Final Plat approval. The proposed plans are consistent with preliminary approval and satisfy all requirements for final approval. Final approval should be conditioned on: 1. Developers Agreement 2. Landscaping Bond 3. Subdivision Dedication Mr. Philip Dommer, was present to respond to questions. Chairman Johnson asked Mr. Larsen what the parkland dedication is for this proposal. Mr. Larsen explained the City agreed to accept 100 feet upland from Hawkes Lake, and the most easterly portion of the site as parkland dedication. Mr. Dommer addressed the Commission informing them of changes to the plan since he last appeared before them. Continuing, Mr. Dommer asked the Commission to note off - street guest parking is now provided, and landscaping for the site will retain a large number of existing trees, and also incorporate new landscaping throughout the site. Mr. Dommer pointed out the development team has also worked closely with neighbors to the south to provide them with an adequate buffer in the form of a berm and landscaping. Mr. Dommer concluded it was the goal of the development team to keep the project centralized and cohesive. Chairman Johnson noted in reality these are individual lots with common grounds. Continuing, he asked, how control is maintained in 'a situation like this. Mr, Larsen said this proposal is requesting a PRD zoning which affords the City more control than if it were a single family development. Mr. Larsen pointed out the association will also have control. Snow removal and yard maintenance will be under the control of the association. Commissioner Byron questioned Mr. Larsen on the density for a PRD -1 zoning. Mr. Larsen said the density for a PRD -1 district is 4 units per acre, and this proposal complies with the Ordinance. Mr. Dommer interjected a majority of the homes will be walkout with total square footage for each unit around 3,600 square feet, with an 1800 square foot , building pad. Continuing, Mr. Dommer said the proposed retaining walls will be used to provide variation between units and ensure character, and balance. Mr. Dommer said owners will be able to design their own home within certain guidelines. With graphics Mr. Dommer pointed out the different home styles offered to future buyers. Concluding, Mr. Dommer said if in the future the adjoining Wegner property becomes available to Mr. Evans he may be interested in developing it by adding it to the westerly portion of the subject site creating a more cohesive development and presence from Olinger. Commissioner McClelland told Mr. Dommer the Commission appreciates the response to concerns raised at previous hearings, and his continued work with the residents of the area. She stated in her opinion this proposal is superior to the previous proposal. Commissioner Byron asked Mr. Dommer if building materials will be required to match each other or somehow blend together. Mr. Dommer said the development team will come up with color pallets that prospective owners can choose from, adding exterior materials will usually be stucco with brick, brick, or like variations. The roof choices will be slate or shake. Mr. Dommer said it is the goal of the development team to have unity in this project, with owners choosing from possibly five different building styles. Mr. Dommer said the real flexibility in this project will be that the owners will be able to choose an interior layout and interior materials. Commissioner Byron asked Mr. Dommer to expand on surface parking. Mr. Dommer said each unit will have a two stall garage with driveway surface parking - between 2 -4 cars depending on if they choose a front loading garage versus a side loading garage. Mr. Dommer said it is the preference of the development team to have most of the garages side loading, which would give each unit two spaces in the garage and four spaces on the driveway. , Continuing, Mr. Dommer said on:the internal south side of the street pads have been pushed back to allow for parallel parking. Mr. Dommer said there are 18 parking stalls provided on this site for visitors. Mr. T. Siefert, 5901 Merold Drive told members of the Commission that he does not have a problem with the proposal as presented, but does not want to see anymore building on the site, or on adjacent properties. . Mr. Jim Matson, 5812 Merold Drive, told members of the Commission his property abuts the proposed development and informed the Commission he has worked closely with the developer on landscaping, etc. Continuing, Mr. Matson questioned if fill would be brought in. Mr. Dommer said fill will be brought in especially for lots 7 -14. Mr. Dommer added fill will also be brought in to accomplish a berm behind some of the adjoining properties (including Mr. Matsons). Concluding, Mr. Dommer explained the majority of the fill will be used in the frontyard area so the front of the house is at grade with the rear remaining at grade. Chairman Johnson asked Mr. Dommer the height of the proposed berm along the property boundary abutting the residential homes. Mr. Dommer said the berm is four to five feet in height. Mr. Dommer asked the Commission to note the proposed retaining walls are located only in the front yard area. Chairman Johnson said he seems to recall the commission preferred that the road into the development be one -way. Mr. Dommer said during review of the project the County, City Engineering Department and Fire Safety felt a two -way road was safer and more efficient. They felt a two -way street system would divide the traffic flow into and out of the site. Commissioner Runyan commented when viewing the proposal it appears to be a single family development. Mr. Dommer agreed, adding this layout affords its owners the privacy one usually associates with single dwelling living with the added benefit of routine maintenance (i.e. snow removal, lawn service, etc.) one enjoys with townhouse development living. Commissioner McClelland moved to recommend final development plan approval subject to staff conditions, subject to the plans presented, maintaining the 100 foot setback from Hawkes Lake and no development can occur on the northeast corner of the property. Commissioner Runyan seconded the motion. Commissioner Byron noted he wants to ensure that the westerly portion of the site remains as is, and what the Commission is voting on this evening is the plans presented. Commissioner Byron said if in the future the adjoining Wegner property becomes available for development with the westerly portion of this site that is an issue the Commission and Council will consider at that time. All voted aye; motion carried. LOCATION REZONING & SUBDIVISION NUMBER Z -96 -3 LOCATION South of Vernon Avenue and east of Olinger Road R E Q U E S T To develop site with 2.6 detached townhouse units. EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT APRIL 2, 1997 Z -96 -3 Final Rezoning, R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District to PRD -1, Planned Reside_ nce District. The Philip Stephen Company S -96 -5 Final Plat Approval. Olde Vernon. The Philip Stephen Company General Location: South of Vernon Avenue and East of Olinger Road The City Council granted Preliminary Rezoning approval for a 26 unit townhouse development -of this property on October 7, 1996. The Commission will recall the developer had proposed a development of 32 units. The Council, in granting preliminary approval did not specify how the unit reduction should be handled. The developer presented a revised plan illustrating 26 units to the Council on January 21, 1997. Minutes from that meeting are attached. The developer has now prepared final plans and is requesting Final Rezoning and Final Plat approval. The primary change in the development plan is that all 26 units are detached, whereas, the preliminary plan illustrated all two unit buildings. The development plan continues the townhouse concept with individual ownership of house pads and common ownership of all other areas, including the road. The proposed Final Plans conform to all requirements of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances, including the required 100 foot setback from Hawkes Lake. In response to concerns raised by the Council additional guest parking has been added to the development. The proposed landscaping plan exceeds ordinance requirements both in terms of sizes and amount of plantings. In the typical townhouse development all buildings share the same architecture and materials. In the proposed development each unit would be custom designed within a controlled context. Homeowners will select from five architectural styles and prescribed list of building materials. In addition the development will be integrated by the landscaping plan and the materials used for retaining walls. RECOM ENDATION Staff recommends Final Rezoning and Final Plat approval. The proposed plans . are consistent with preliminary approval and satisfy all requirements for final approval. Final approval should be conditioned on: 1. Developers Agreement 2. Landscaping Bond 3.' Subdivision Dedication Minutes/Edina City Council/January 21 997 municipalities, and WHEREAS, the right turn lane into the Firestone site is granted subject to dedicated easements, site cleanup and any loss of parking due to the right turn lane bein vided at no cost to the City of Edina or Hennepin County. j NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that said Final Plan be in gs approved and that the County is hereby authorized by the City to acquire all ri of way, permits and /or easements required for said improvements in accordance w' a Final Plan, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City shall ban the parki " of motor vehicles within the project limits on CSAH 53, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City will not tm increment financing for any portion of the project cost. .� Member Faust seconded the motion. Rollcall: ; Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold, Smith Resolution adopted. Hovland to continue the France Avenue South, ti February 3, 1997. Motion carried on rol C Motion of Member Maetzold seconded by Member pensive Plan Amendment for Quasi Public to Office, 7128 of Lutheran 'Church of the Master, Pinehurst Properties, to - five ayes. 1conded by Member Hovland to continue the Prelimi � it District to POD -1 D1�R� A#fiep- Bieh;rf --—'y - five ayes. 3, 1997. Motion of Member -1 Single th, site of REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAN REVIEW FOR OLDE VERNON Planner Larsen explained the proponent presented a 32 -unit townhouse plan for Council consideration on October 7, 1996. Council approved the plan, but with a reduced density to 26 units. The proponent has revised the plan and is seeking Council's opinion before coming back for final approval. Planner Larsen reviewed the changes from the original plan to the revised plan. The revised plan illustrates a 26 -unit townhouse style development. However, all buildings .are now single unit buildings. Residents would not own individual lots, only the building pad of their home, with all open space commonly held by the Homeowner's Association. The design of the individual homes, building materials and size would be limited to control the overall look of the development. The proposed general layout and private street system remain consistent with the plan reviewed in October. Planner Larsen explained the next step in the approval process would be for the proponent to prepare final plans for review by the Planning Commission. Final Plans would include: final plat, design and material specifications for buildings,. final utility and grading plans; and landscaping plan and schedule. He concluded that Staff believes the revised plan is consistent with the preliminary plan. Council members expressed concerns with surface parking on the site. Planner Larsen explained Page 4 Minutes /Edina City Council /January 21 1997 the Code requires two garage stalls per home, but no other surface parking. Concern was also expressed over emergency vehicle access and the potential for conflict with crowded on- street parking. Proponent Comment Philip Dommer, representing the developer, thanked the Council for the opportunity to appear. Mr. Dommer informed the Council the developer has met with the neighbors and believes the revised plan satisfies neighbors' concerns, meets City code and is a viable project from the the developer's viewpoint. He summarized the redesign features: reduction in number of homes to 26, the proposal to dedicate the area around Hawkes Lake to the City as open space, buildings pulled away from the southerly property line and landscaping planned to provide visual separation, no access to Wycliffe, access to development from Vernon, and strict guidelines prescribing size, character, quality and period architecture of the new homes. Mr. Dommer emphasized the developer's desire to dedicate the land around Hawkes Lake to the City, adding this would be done in lieu of subdivision dedication. He concluded stating the developer would be willing to look at the possibility of including parking on the north side of the private road. However, Mr. Dommer stated he heeds an answer on the land in lieu of cash question since there is the possibility of the northeast portion of the land around Hawkes Lake being a building site. Mayor Smith asked if staff agreed with the dedication of land in lieu of subdivision dedication. Planner Larsen replied in his opinion answering "this question would be premature at this time. Public Comment Daryl Seifert, 5901 Merold Drive, informed Council she likes the revised development plan. Ms. Seifert feels the plan ' now melds into the existing neighborhood. She, added the developer has worked with the neighbors to the mutual satisfaction of all involved. Lynn Hechter, 5.816 Merold Drive, stated she opposed the-proposed development, however, now she is happy to see single family units proposed. Ms. Hechter praised the developer, both for his willingness to work out the neighborhood issues and the high quality'of the proposed development. . Council briefly discussed the proposed development, expressing their concern over surface parking, asking the price ranges of the units and asking the timing planned for final plan review. Mr. Dommer acknowledged the concern about parking, stated the units would start at $350,000 and repeating his need for a decision on the land dedication in lieu of subdivision dedication. He concluded the developer intends to appear before the Planning Commission at their February meeting then come to City Council by the second meeting in March. Mayor Smith suggested Mr. Dommer review the Council's concerns and work with staff on the subdivision dedication issue. "WV7-%rw yr ow MMMIN surrLY AtSQUIT TOWN WINDER 1997 Motion made by Maetzold and seconded by Member Hovland for award of bid for the paper .sup Town. Winter 1997 to Unisource at $6,413.10. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. mvvmr%u yr pip rvrc stir IJKUPF- C REET SWEEPER Motion made by Member Maetzold and seconded by Mem land for award of bid for one Self Propelled Street Sweeper replacing Uni to MacQueen Equipment under Minnesota Cooperative Purchasi ontract 79097 -03001 at $95,917.10 Mof arried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *AWARD OF BID FOR EMERGENCY ROAD SALT PURCHASE Motion made by Member Page 5 REPORURECOM ENDATION . TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item # IV.C. FROM: CRAIG LARSEN Consent 0 DATE: JANUARY 21, 1997 Information Only ❑ SUBJECT: Mgr. Recommends ❑ To IRA Z -96-4, Preliminary Rezoning . ® To Council Approval, and Preliminary Plat Approval. Olde Vernon. Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance Recommendation: No formal action is required since the rezoning was granted preliminary approval on October 7, 1996. However, the proponent is seeking Council input on the consistency of the revised plan with the plan given preliminary approval. Background: On October 7, 1996, the proponent presented a 32 unit townhouse plan for Council consideration. The plan illustrated 16, two unit buildings. Council action was to approve the plan, but with a reduced, density of 26 units. No other conditions were attached to preliminary approval. The revised plan illustrates a 26 unit townhouse style development, however all buildings are now single unit buildings. The proposed general layout and private street system remain consistent with the plan reviewed in October. Although all units are now detached, the development concept remains that of a townhouse development. The proponent has supplied a written description of the design features of the revised plan (attached). Staff believes the revised plan is consistent with the development concept approved by the Council in October of 1996. Since the proposal has received preliminary approval, the next step would be'to prepare final plans for review by the Planning Commission. Final plans would include: * Final plat * Design and material specifications for buildings * Final utility and grading plans * Landscaping plan and schedule . BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council: of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Each assessment asset forth in the assessment roil on file in the office of the City Clerk for each aforementioned improvement is hereby acceed and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and eacYtract of land therein included is hereby found be benefited by the improvement in the 71in unt of the assessment levied against it. 2. The assessments shall be payable in eq. sta llments, the first of said installments, together with interest at a rate of 8.0 percentper annum, on the entire assessment from the date hereof to December 31, 1996; to °be payolrle with the general taxes for the year 1996. To each subsequent installment shall be added Aterest at the above rate for one year on all then unpaid installments. The number of such nual installments shall be as follows: NAME OF IMPROVEMENT NO, INSTALLMENTS Watermain Improvement, No. WM -317, L y No. 13803 10 years Street Improvement w /curb & gutter N A -302 Levy No. 13805 10 years Street Improvement w /curb &gutter . BA -303 Levy, No. 13804 10 years Street Improvement w /curb & gutter o. BA -308 Levy No. 13806 10 years Aquatic Weeds Improvement No. -96 Levy No. 13798 1 year Maintenance Improvement No. M 6 Levy No. 13795 1 year Tree Removal Improvement No R -96 Levy No. 13800 1 year Tree Removal Improvement N . TR -96 Levy No. 13801 3 years Tree Removal Improvement o. TR -96 Levy No. 13802 5 years Tree Removal Improveme No. TR -96 Levy No. 13864 6 years Tree. Trimming Improve nt No. TT -96 Levy No. 13799 1 year 3. The owner of an roperty so assessed may; at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the coun auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the da of payment, to the city treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire as ssment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution; and they may, at an !me thereafter, pay to the city treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaini unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. ch payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through Decemb 31 of the next succeeding year. . 4. T clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the county audit o o be extended on the property tax lists of the county. Such assessment shall be collecte nd paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. opted this 7th day of October 1996. Motion f adoption of the resolution seconded by Member Maetzold. Roll I: Ay : Kelly, Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, Richards Resolution adopted. 1'n�PUBLIC HEARINGS HELD: PRELIMINARY REZONING APPROVED - R -1 SINGLE DWELLING X11 UNIT DISTRICT TO PRD -1. PLANNED RESIDENCE DISTRICT AND PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED OLDE VERNON (SOUTH OF VERNON AVENUE AND EAST OF OLINGER ROAD2 - PHILIP STEPHEN COMPANY Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Presentation by Planner Planner Larsen stated the subject property is an undeveloped tract of land measuring 9.1 acres in area. The original development proposal submitted at the September 3, 1996, Council meeting requested rezoning the property from R -1, Single Dwelling District to PRD -1 Planned Residence District to allow a development of 34 townhouse dwellings. Currently, the proponent has reduced the request to 32 townhouse dwellings and revised the development. Planner Larsen reviewed changes to the proposed development. From reducing the total unit.count to 32 the density is reduced to 3:5 units per acre. The three unit buildings were removed so all buildings now contain two units, and the cul de sac in the south central portion of the site has been eliminated. The internal private street now loops to Olinger Road. and storm water retention has been increased on the site. Pr000nent Comment Philip Dommer. representing developer, thanked the Council for the opportunity to appear. Mr. Dommer stated they, are seeking a positive vote to move the project forward. He continued the storm water handling on the site has been re- engineered, the fire /safety access has been revised, the three unit buildings revised and total unit count reduced to 32. Mr. Dommer believes that density appears to be the largest issue in the proposal. However, the revised plan - pulled away from the existing neighborhoods allowing for more landscaping to screen the existing neighborhoods if desired. Public Comment Mark Stoeger. 5616 Highwood Drive, expressed concern with the long road running from Vernon to Olinger and its proximity to Vernon Avenue-. John Forney, 5321 Merold Drive,. speaking on behalf of many neighbors. Mr. Forney referred to an October 2, 1996 letter signed by fifteen property owners regarding the proposed development, requesting .a smaller number of units and improved separation of the development from the neighborhood. Mr. Forney took issue with the proponent's seeking a variance from the minimum acreage to develop, the density of the proposed townhouses and method of calculating the density, the setbacks. berms, and landscaping. Mr. Forney stated if the density.were correct for the site, all other items would also be rectified. Lyndon Moquist. 5612 Heather Lane, asked that Council keep an open mind about what is the best use of the remaining land. Mr. Moquist stated his opinion there is a real need for single family detached homes in Edina if the price is kept less than $650,000. Steve McCormick, 5613 Heather Lane, expressed concern with the traffic control in the area and access onto Vernon Avenue. Mr. McCormick questioned the impact that storm water drainage into Hawkes Lake will have on the lake. He also believes the Council should not be concerned about any potential lawsuits regarding zoning issues Lynn Gallop, 5932 Groves Street, voiced concern with the rezoning. Mr. Gallop stated his belief that it is the Council's duty to protect homeowners from the actions of individual owners that may adversely affect existing neighborhoods. Caroline Forney, 5821 Merold Drive, stated that there does not appear to be a hardship in this situation warranting granting a variance to rezone the property. Dennis Wagner. 5705 Olinger Road, stated the proposal as revised, will have a drastic effect on his property since the road will now run the entire length of his property. Mr. Wagner felt the development will affect traffic,both on Vernon and Olinger. Phil Dommer stated the developer wants to work with the neighbors and have several options they can look at to find a solution meeting everyone's expectations. Council Discussion /Action Council briefly discussed the revised proposal. Total number of units for the site ranged between 24 and 30. Concern was expressed that citizens know the.Council looks after the best interests of the entire City, and therefore applies the zoning laws uniformly. In addition, the length of the road running along the Wagner property was noted as was the proposed increase in traffic. Member Smith moved granting first reading to the rezoning of Olde Vernon and approving the Preliminary Plat for 26 units of Olde Vernon. Member Paulus seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly. Nlaetzold. Paulus. Smith, Richards PROPOSAL T1O ' RECEIVED o� PRELIMINARY APPROVAL 10/7/96, ty P'IE/ .IE .• J t •�'' G R. -1 6 I � � / ) R • rr n... .� i' j�.l' .. SSW �rM+.4• � F. Iny4rr M'lflll /•' Mi -1 rot Mr, Ir - .Irll�tr 1'Inirrrr ' •r lrrrl . FL�� IMl Va��r M, M tip. ■ � - P hJ F fflM 1 Mt�11I1 Iw wr�lrl 1 ` ...,. ter„. C2.3 4v re ice! � •• � s! - �,� - 16. Sj. - � .1r_ - -:y ; rat :.�••,:�..;.. _ � �:��c;={:� °�, �_t��'� !' ��: � _ ,. :�' I :i m.!v 4f Adm ww. -a, _- -s ri -Tv :ICA ps M -Mr-Iti-31; Mm rz i zm % MWV- , gap--t-qw a! zt-tl i'U- irc.c�.1�7r 10;1'HM MILES mUMES 1NTL N0.696 P.3 Ode Vernon Design Control Summary I. Site I es: Site Context: Design character and scale will respect the former era of the site when used as a roadway through the meadow past Hawk-es Lake. Arrival: Amenities will be visible from the exterior of the project as well as the interior roadway. Site lines will be preserved to the new pond. The interior roadway will afford a view of Hawkes Lake for all residents. Iayering: Building pads are established a layer above the street level and defined by a stone retaining wall with capstone. Consistent stone based products will define other features throughout the project. Infrastructure: To the greatest degree possible, hydrants, transformers, utility poles, lights will be integrated in the layering scheme to minimize impact. Parking: . Additional parking is provided around the site and framed by limestone features. Landscaping: To the greatest extent possible the existing trees are preserved. Generous use of 16,+ whitespire birch provide a lace veil effect enhancing the streetscape without masking the architecture of the homes. Olde Vernon Design Control Summary 11, Lot Issues: Entry: Front areas should enhance the streetscape and one's first impression. Homes should be visibly appealing from the curb, but not necessarily physically inviting_ Plan for private outdoor areas and consider security issues. Building Pad: Each lot has been provided a generous building pad. All structures , including covered porches must be within the designated building pad. On grade decks, patios, planners, and, firepits less than 100 square feet are permissible outside the pad. Exclusive Use Easements: Each homesite has an area designated outside the building pad as an exclusive use easement. Walkways, landscaping and on grade decks, patios, planters, and, firepits less than 100 square feet are permissible in the exclusive use area. Private outdoor areas should be deliberately developed in the planning process. Service Areas: All meters, mechanical equipment, 'firewood, containers will be screened from view. Appropriate screening should be incorporated into the design features of the building. The Car: Minimize width and impact of driveways along streetscape. MRR.28.1997 10 :15RM MILES HOMES INTL Olde Vernon Design Control Summary M. Architectural Issues: Entry: The entry and front porch area is the focus of the front elevation. at the front, including materials, scale, and proportion are required. NO. E396 P.5 Special attention to details Garages: - - Olde Vernon will not feature garages. Wherever possible, side entry garages are preferred. Garage doors should be softened by recessing, adding windows,, overhanging trellises, and, blending colors and texture with the main body of the home. Overly detailed garage doors are prohibited. Design Variety: Architectural variety is encouraged within the project among compatible styles. The general nature of the styles. desired lean toward the cottage applications v. the estate home interpretations. Approved styles for the project include: • Colonial Revival • Tudor Revival including Norman influences • English Revival primarily picturesque & Cottage • French Revival including Country interpretations • American Cottage including Bungalow and Craftsman influences Basic forms and mass representing the depicted style are desired to represent the intended character. Excessive ornamentation, while perhaps true to the style, is prohibited when applied to structures whose form is not consistent with the period. Materials: Maintenance free materials are required for the home exteriors. Approved materials include: • Brick • Stucco • Stone & Slate • Bleached shake Wood accents are. permitted as detailing elements. Synthetic products which are true representations of the selected materials are permitted after review and approval by the Design Control Committee. Color and Texture: Color and texture variety- are encouraged. Main body forms should remain in the eatthtone families reflective of their base material color. Accent colors may be bolder. Form & Function: Homes should compliment a maintenance free, independent lifestyle. Less is more. Olde Vemon Design Conhol Summary JU. ��iilectmrl issues A. Colonial Revive! Palletns: Colonial Revival homes are generally a combination of various Colonial styles itrcluding New England, Southern, Du1cb, Georgian and Federal. A1slinga�jAq Fea�irxr • Gable roof, moderately pitched • Entry pedcuents often wish hansom • Wood shlaglcs • Untels and sdls at windows • Typically plain cad chimney • 616 windows typically double hung COMMOn Ch sclYrlgks . • Often brick, shake, stone and wood &creak also common•- • Typically stung symmetrical elements. • lotersee ft gables often over dormers or portico • Ovenited catty sidelights • Side porches with balustrade or tide portioo • Solid panel or louvered shutters flaulang windows • Acceoled comice • 6 panel entry door • scrnicimular portico at entry l..•vuto I 6N�fA �AU•! p••0. /IA I�UOO W s t.lo.lE =inaAS•cn.Mt 60864 V.tw Aq Woon 'Rveo C.rt/Jte6 Aeea.rr r• ti O� 6EI41 LIACu•t Nn F.NTKD rEp.Mawr `=r Ean4y 'PO WILL SNU rn4 BALD 67AAOE sop )eACif IDtlleK EM. CND •ey SIPS tGMT •a,.,Ge Itt•Nf r Z O m uD M f1q�cK lT Olde Vernon Design Control Summary tt, Archltectmra Isms• B. Tudor Revival indudiog Norman Mueam: Primarily adapted from English Rcwlsm a armhitecture of the 1610 and 17th cetrttuies. Typically rambling and asymmemml. Distin ishmQ Features,, • Gable roof oRen with sloping gables, steeply pitched • Wood or elate shiagks • Typically end or Wedor chimney with detailed cap • Half Eimberlag • Ink-ectmg gables • Rows of leaded windows typically casement Sig. diamond, sometimes arched �MnrnOa Chaaw4pristics. • Open stucco with half dmbers and stone • Typically asymmetrical elements - • Gable or shed dormers • Eadry porches of stone with balustrade • Typically without shulfem • Aooeated corner port • Vertical plank entry door AacN Wuv6ew 6015-L DOAI wA TO-4;r PITCH 6 L0 /W 6 6AAaR. 'DI -Awwpa ew.Idwrdw7 Weep; A Pei H ALF 11-064039, �N sru cd r G r SLA7e. tj (jeep U h C 0 1 f r r U it#— or c"ems.ar C ro EIJO r_#41w 6y V U 1 r Z CJ CD to ti'1 Olde Vernon Design Coottol Slrmmary Architectural !snits: C. 909M Revival prvnarily Pldmraque and Cottage: Primarily adapted from the Tudor, but a simpkr application, few grandeur in silWt+e, but mon n mantic In style. Distimisbine' Features: • Gable roof often with sloping gables, steeply pitched • Wood or slate abmglea, may be Irregular pattern to saiMIC thatching • Typically promlocul brick chimneys with multiple hues • Half timbering in intersecting gables with minimal overhang • Intersecting gables • Nanow cavcmcnts in rows or 616 double hung windows Common Chwacteristicr- • Often stucco with and half timbers and stone. • Typically asymmetrical elemertis • Gable or eyebrow dormers • Fntry pomhts with brick accents • TypicAy without shutters Virtually without oomice and coiner accent • Vertical plank or multiple Patel door 1 ANLF 7 /r7adst spl SN7aRleern44 WT 6AOaC! aMCK' Aea.,rr, Sa•rr. ROOF NAIF 7nvva4 =N I - IF aaat,ry IN rce Steno PIra.N 11WI•rwL •vaANwN4 Ar GpatE Pweu� A+4. stucco �5 MUL71 /la FOAL b/b rNWta KIIN6 CAP �pa40 YlAA rA Ila Orr ROerw6 6N0 GNOmra 1 ENSPAW Ronk -fA �Ar wa,17 =i4�eK (:,IrIMNLt Olde Vemnn Design Control Stonmary Architectural Lmer, D. French Revival (nclud[ng Coumry interprelatiogm Includes a broad range of French architecture with characar similar to country estam of Brittany and Nornoandy. ea • Wwped pavilion roof, steeply pitched • ShHe or wood shingles • lWkally narrow but tall Interior stuom ehbnm7s with cap • Hipped mlersecting gables when premat • Narrow casemeota or 9/6 double hung wh&ws strong relalion between lower and upper windows on Characterlsti • Often stocco with brick tmden=th • 9ypically a*munelrical from entry • Hipped, srehed or sbed dormers • Fagry porches wild wrought imo balconies above • typically louvered shatters frame windows • Strung cornice accents • Paneled doors 2wR•A ••ttlMa "I"Ca 6 *a1! AVA4weW CA••-•,+r Woad SOW&LL Nr.Pco l?isvtcJOa Reos C&RNICE, ACC*mf WWWl iA1N I ALt•N, RNL 5tl6o D•arecit L • uwntu saairags TALL TNTe-tr•f'r ST 4 ccO 9/& W"Odw Rw's a n 0 U U t t. f- I U 1 3 rr U. 1 r Z 0 tD W 0) 1D Olds Vernon Design COnaol Summary M ArcrregWalImes• R. American Cetsage including Bungalow and Crafllanen influences. Typically reflective of a preference for handcsaftsmanship and natural materials used to create simple No functional homes. • Cnble roof, with moderate pitch • Wood shingles, extends to siding t reaLnent as well • TYPICRUY plain. narrow, tall. brick chimneys an exterior when present • Hipped air gabled covered Coot porch • 11/1 or 911 double huug windows sonxtimes in boxed bays with shed soar and oiteo grouped in dormers on upper levels Common ChanicsLyMcs • Typically wood shake bus some brick and stone • Stronger symmetry than Eogft and French • Shed or gable dormers • Wider. covcmd entry porches with dwarf piers or Oared base eolunim • No shutters • Horizontal aceeol trim boards at gable base • Panaled doors 11 SH•o pr,or r p i t)r..A•r pose Boot DAY Q. naq e•a u•.�r YIOn• J..,4A q jA Al"W dr•mid SOEO A&Awrda 60toauke r Jh..K I i lot A MWA ■ LAW � l-W a■oe I'M LA� , A '46 .: -j. s* . -7-Tt40-2, 9 l� 001- ,` ` 1 - ,.... '6, 1,0 Vy- !r R +• IG � yf U I L 5' (TYP) LOr DET/LIL NR SCALE OLDE VERNON ?-0 P` Olde Vernon Estate Hamm an Hawkey Lake Vernon Avenue at Olinger Road Edina, Minnesota Wy OF e EDINA MINNESOTA Owner: Leo M. Evans 2246 Glacier Lane Santa Maria, Ca. 93454 (805) 937 -2151 Developer: Philip S. Dommer The Philip Stephen Co.'s 2605 Forestdale Road New Brighton, MN 55112 (612) 604 -0937 Architect /Planner Perry R. Bolin 1885 University Ave. Suite 50 St. Paul, Mn. 55104 644 -1173 Fax 644 -1887 �auLrt+rIeNAYSart laYm m. DAn. mYrwunoa 7/17/46 I..1— 1 I J5Y0 Y.1,... 0 • JJJYI IAIEI.TJ -JEi2 ire.. /e:..10 z1.TJ -JIJ[Y DATE: 4/30/96 FILE NAFTE: CW100vWWC PROJECT NO. P506mi SITE PLAN C2.1 7/0 C7.1 STE PLAN CS.I 30 YALE CRAVNC RAN C1.7 70 SCALE C¢AONC PLAN (WEST) C7] 70 SCALE CRA DC PLAN (EAST) C4.1 SAA SEWER k WATEVT PLAN CI .7 STREET & STORM SEWER PLAN C7.1 PETAL SHEET LI.I LANDSCAPE PLAN (WEST) L1.7 LADSCAPE PLAN (EAST) LI] T I.1 LAA,E OETAL SHEET IOSC TREE MESERVATION PLAN �auLrt+rIeNAYSart laYm m. DAn. mYrwunoa 7/17/46 I..1— 1 I J5Y0 Y.1,... 0 • JJJYI IAIEI.TJ -JEi2 ire.. /e:..10 z1.TJ -JIJ[Y DATE: 4/30/96 FILE NAFTE: CW100vWWC PROJECT NO. P506mi SITE PLAN C2.1 7/0 CITY SIBMTTAL 7/76 Cth' CORENTS 4/30 STOe1 SEWEe OPTVMS 3/7/47 CITY RENEW 7 /e/47 FNAL CITY eEVEW �auLrt+rIeNAYSart laYm m. DAn. mYrwunoa 7/17/46 I..1— 1 I J5Y0 Y.1,... 0 • JJJYI IAIEI.TJ -JEi2 ire.. /e:..10 z1.TJ -JIJ[Y DATE: 4/30/96 FILE NAFTE: CW100vWWC PROJECT NO. P506mi SITE PLAN C2.1 `1 0— GRADING (9« Ip.lisasn [7 .., .................... ................. ............................... ..................................... ............................... SITE SYMBOLS EIDTNC NEW DISCePTtlN ....................... ORTH 0 50 100 %7� SCALE IN FEET e MY or EDINA MINNESOTA Owner: Leo M. Evans 2248 Glacier Lane Santa Maria, Ca. 93454 (805) 937 -2151 Developer: Philip S. Dommer The Philip Stephen Co.'s 2605 Forestdale Road New Brighton. MN 55112 (612) 604 -0937 Architect /Planner Perry R. Bolin 1885 University Ave. Suite 50 St. Paul, Mn. 55104 644 -1173 Fax 644 -1887 r C7.1 0— GRADING (9« Ip.lisasn [7 .., .................... ................. ............................... ..................................... ............................... SITE SYMBOLS EIDTNC NEW DISCePTtlN ....................... ORTH 0 50 100 %7� SCALE IN FEET e MY or EDINA MINNESOTA Owner: Leo M. Evans 2248 Glacier Lane Santa Maria, Ca. 93454 (805) 937 -2151 Developer: Philip S. Dommer The Philip Stephen Co.'s 2605 Forestdale Road New Brighton. MN 55112 (612) 604 -0937 Architect /Planner Perry R. Bolin 1885 University Ave. Suite 50 St. Paul, Mn. 55104 644 -1173 Fax 644 -1887 I� 7/1`7 CITY SLAV11TAL 7/76- CITY C 9 /30 STORM SEWER OPTgB 7/7/97 - -VIEW FINAL CITY REVIEW aYl:n .lANepOOP AlVA96 I�eplerm Eu6lo..nuF [emp.p.•p'!6 T.el.. 6 i . pnuler.rd . 5]el uSW I6 ZNIS- ]'e3't . N. /6�I.IfiIiNT3 -S I6pp•3 DATE: 9/30/46 FILE NAME: C30100VLDWG PROJECT NO. Pa46001 CRADWC PLAN C3.1 NN1n I++n. C7.1 SITE PLAN p.1 50 SCALE CRADNIC PLAN C].7 70 SCALE CRAONC RAN (WEST) C3.7 70 SCALE CRAVING RAN (EAST) CA.I SAL SEWER • WATERMAN PLAN U.7 STREET B STOe1 SEWER PLAN C7.1 DETAIL S EET LLI LANDSCAPE PLAN (WEST) LL7 LANDSCAPE- PLAN (EAST) LL] TI.I LANDSCAPE DETAIL SPEET TREE PRESERVATION PLAN I� 7/1`7 CITY SLAV11TAL 7/76- CITY C 9 /30 STORM SEWER OPTgB 7/7/97 - -VIEW FINAL CITY REVIEW aYl:n .lANepOOP AlVA96 I�eplerm Eu6lo..nuF [emp.p.•p'!6 T.el.. 6 i . pnuler.rd . 5]el uSW I6 ZNIS- ]'e3't . N. /6�I.IfiIiNT3 -S I6pp•3 DATE: 9/30/46 FILE NAME: C30100VLDWG PROJECT NO. Pa46001 CRADWC PLAN C3.1 R PLANT LIST - PHASE 2 o1ee� c�ueta DQ7PImm -b" 01101 �E ] dd•M �.,�r�.rY • •rt. m o.w.y s D.•]sw wY.er PW.w.1e.�• s..L ra it DWARF BLUELEAF ATRIC WILLOW 5 GAL. 20 DWARF BUSH HONEYSUCKLE 5 GAL. Ib WNITESPIRE BIRCH MULTISTEI'•I Ib'H BB/MI't Ib STAGNORN SUMAC 5 GAL. ' 'r� ; b AMUR MAPLE :�1 � J: b•w BB 0 5 AUSTRIAN PINE SIZES NOTED b AMUR MAPLE WW BB 1 SARGENT NIGI.151.18.1 RANBERRY 5 GAL. VAN PINE S *W BB r Olde Vernon Estate Hamm on Hawkee Lake Vernon Avenue at Olinger Road Edina, Minnesota B }: CRY OF EDINA MINNESOTA Owner: Leo M. Evans 2248 Glacier Lane Santa Maria, Ca. 93454 (805) 937 -2151 Developer: Y Philip S. Dommer The Philip Stephen Co.'s 2805 Forestdale Road New Brighton, MN 55112 (612) 604 -0937 Architect /Planner Perry R. Bolin 1885 University Ave. Suite 50 St. Paul, Mn. 55104 644 -1173 Fax 644 -1887 NO 0 30 60 %m%=� SCALE IN FEET r 7/17 CITY SLOMTTAL C2.1 517E PLAN C3.1 50 SCALE CRADNC PLAN C3.7 70 SCALE CQADNC PLAN (WEST) CIS 70 SCALP CQADNC PLAN (EAST) C4.I SAW. SEWER • WATERMAN PLAN C4.7 STREET I STORM SEWER PLAN C7.1 DETAIL SHEET LIJ LANDSCAPE PLAN (WEST) LL7 LANDSCAPE PLAN (EAST) LU TLI LANDSCAPE DETAIL SE ET iQEE PQESEQVAf1pN RAN are Hawn, 7/17 CITY SLOMTTAL 7/76 CTTY COMMENTS 4/30 STORM SEWER OPTONS 3/3/47 OTY REVEw 3/01/47 FNAL CITY QEVEw f auLm nrumva erd m. a 1. df : ']L. mm C ,w 025 —Z.0— C­... l]1ilO] -Rh Ifu /Jw101]IO3 -LSY •35].1 DATE. 4/70/46 FILE NAME: LIeQOpVIDQW PROJECT NO. PB46001 LANDSCAPE PLAN EAST L1.2 ,z N.� 4 B02. Olde Vernon i' p• h x: ;b ai , Notrr Estate Homes on Hawkey Lake 0 20 40 Vernon Avenue at Oli nger R .'" oad �. x�r ti .. Xi Edina. Minnesota 0 0 t: a.. - ,0•0- O` .% T z:o 1 ...... v�. t i i SCALE IN FEET < / n�•t 516.7 ... X ^ (�. +y ). a •: V{.. F6.0 7E7 NS .:3 i1 CRT OF 19.7 0..` EDINA N MINNESOTA T 17.7 \ q\ 0. -\1 h , B 16.7 (,�. ILJ 9 O � }K'R� j •i µ: \ ` O�ii;.{:j.•: :Ctt( i e�i a5KK�6? Te.4 Qo o Owner: C� •: / I; Leo L. Evans FN-0 r s> \ PN ?'• "- 2 ✓�\ilt' 48 cier n o cy 22 Cla la e /TUCK CORNER OF twL Nc . B N-0. \ B D.71 � Santa Maria. Ca. 93454 (805) 937 -2151 Nf0 HILL 9mE..>...>.... 1 T 19.9 6. F 1781 00 :Ft�"' . �. ' ' "• / N 9 '�` � 1 B N9 1 , . t3 C.'S,�� t• •S. qt 2 B w$ Developer: F N.O i•.'H.- .. �.. T 9.7 T NJ `.,: cA o cP 4,t Philip S. Dommer The Philip Stephen Co.'s }. ?:... �s 2s 3 z�,,♦ ti': 2805 Forestdale Road ... ..... "` New Brighton, MN 55112 :; :. .. : ,++99 7 ,.80.7 O t \ \. 26 ' ` B .� (612) 604-0937 T 13.2 ........ T L7H 917. Tu j :... -•' ... - -•., - (3Q1 ►�r•A 9 �o ��s ch ct /Pla + Ar ite nner ter./ le7 w Perry R Bolin pp�s� 1885 University Ave. 000 1 r 134 IBT1.e: x:.'. z - B 17.4 Suite 50 r �'T N og F - Fax ....... 25 p B 00 t F 11.7 ••``'� 117 _ Paul, Fa 5844 1887 1 „1 ( I` • 844 IB 0.0 _ .7 �• .. _ �Fg: .: ........ T ILO.:' 22 Py . ` 0 B ILO ; 'in \ T 70.1/ BR 511.0 it, F 149 + T 70 -3 F e.fi T 70.1 F 15.8 a / e10 B e Q•\0�0 7p0(:r`�.. �•t ` "�' •... .. n B 70.1 SV F 07?/ .. �.. - _......... O T 044 aL T7 L B 7 ..... �.... ✓ .,.. F 70.1 B i F 0, a - ..- :..... -. FFW Y/ Y 70 n e B 70. B - - 20.4 FLq 20 6 A. . � L B 70 15AG "T 20.4 • 0 �� F?O % F2 T704 ` Q las�� 8 70.7 , 6 /B 7 0.7 B RJ rr�. v - - 02 / M •�� al�E6lL •mr I * nE Cl: SITE PLAN C3.I 90 SCALP CRAONC PLAN C3.7 70 SCALE CRAONC PLAN (WEST) C3J 70 SCALE CRAONC PLAN (EAST) C4.1 SAN SEWER A WATERMAN 0.N! C1.7 STREET • STORM SEWER PLAN C7.1 OETAL SHEET LLI LANDSCAPE PLAN (WEST) LID LAIDSCA E PLAN (EAST) 1.I.3 TI.1 LANDSCAPE DETAL SHEET TREE PRESERVATION PLAN am � Ax.rlw 7/17 CITY SUMIAL 7/76 CITY C 9130 STORM SEWER OPTIONS 3/3/47 CITY REVEW ]/e/47 FNAL CITY REVEW �oNLm.nNAmm AOV�A m. a merw�.lPw �W or 7/n/46 F - FRONT OF WALL LkITILIJ • T - TOP OF WALL 13 - BALL OF WALL ...a..... e..,....H.. c.,....,..ae T..1.. o... -1- onwA UtAac nnw 06 -16 CURB - DATE: 4/30/46 FILE NN'IE: C3030OVI PROJECT NO. P006001 20 SCALE CRAOINC PLAN C3.3 i 7 ON 5 Ab NP TWO - , . , -- ... .. �,\b 632 15.13 Ito 0 r, 0'/. a 72 T 77.3 201, 5 Poj 18A *,�� I .. 0, 8 72ja T 75 ........... :Ll B F la.T,. 8 107's Ia,,.r ....... 7-- is T 20.4 Q c 8 FU F D pq.q Nis F 7L7\ 17.5 K 15-0 .. . ........ ".\ .......... ...... . o,q, 123-1 a "0 F lq.q 170.4 .1 FLq T 23.2 13.5 11S.O..... I- q23.50 876 0.0 ... ................................... Be \ 20.6 a Iq.q _650 F 4 -19 20 F2' ------------- PE3 "3 0 ...... F FL, 12 ............ 91 ADO O 20.4 I6 8-26.0 18.46 pkI Y. . "o':o q12.50 �C PR �v J,( F F-L4 FBWO - -- - 6, 1 . T 2o.� 5W3 r 822.50 F 70 F 26 PE3WO T 23. \ \ .-,,i 82 "261 P 70.6 T "70.6 077.5 021.0 1717 821.75 120's 121 F A.6 B70 :1 6 T2Ll C" SLOMIAL 0 ...... F 206 F 7 q T 2L) B 20.65 7/76 ory Corriews 2127 172.1 .0 ' a 1.0 q13O STOqm SEWER opi&a 7 .0 F 20 T 2 .9 3/3/q7 CITY REVIEW 3/15/q7 FtOL CITY REVIEW T 7 1 8 AS F 20 q9 20-9 ieao 8717; 0 F 20.6 P 20 F 20. t'870.9 T21.1 0.7 Q aO \ 30 820.6 F M. T 2 B 22,8 Lq T 2LO F 22 0 920.5 T? .5 5 F A.3 T 70.5 Q! P.02 020.6 022.6 71.7 1 117 F 20. T 20.8 F 2.5 7, (li F2.0 TO T )t.2 070.5 T2 a 70.z-, 2 0 T 23�5 $LBO 2 FLOQ 52 1- r F 13 2-5 A.67 12to 123., q23.25 5 71-0 F, 1-7 a 70.0 V 20.16 0 I 7N F JOY--- f 717 F 203 820.6 0217. f \.4 0 ......... . .. ..... .. . '7 7 -ar a -E .. .. cc".-­ •3 DATE: 4 /30/qS FILE NAME: C-*07wvl PeClAwl 20 SCALE CRADNIC PLAN C3.2 ............................................................................................. .................... PLANT LIST - PHASE 2 MdH= =n2LH&Z 091MWAlN OIS �@ memam mo_ iweer ftw IP~ SIZES NOTED 7� " \� CITY OF 71C 921.77 21.77 26 A k! EDIN ...... . . r DWARF LUELEAF Al ATRIC WILLOW MINNESOTA 24 DWARF BUSW HONEYSUCKLE 5 GAL. 24 PDOW BUSH 4O_NEY&JCKLE-` 5 GAL. ............. VIEMJ04LJM 7 GAL. ..................... --- ATt- 4 AUSTRIAN PINE .. ......... ...... 6 WHITE PINE SIZES NOTED .............. SIZES NOTED 13 TWERESE BLIGNET ROSE -.- 7 2 GAL. 15 SARGENT WIGw5uSW K. 2 JAPANESE, TREE LILAC... CRANBERRY 5 .... .... ... .. . . �O. :­"� _­1 ........ ..... '14 Ba . .. .. ..... .... .. .. ........... Is WINGED ELIONYMS . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 GAL 86 25 '17' -V 251M .2 REDMOhID.LIkDEN 2 1/2' BB a,.,.,..,o. •,..L. o 3 BLACK WILLS SPRUCE 8 TWERESE BUGNET ROSE 14 NAN%IYBERRY %AfQ5URNLJM ?AALm_ WH �\ \ 5 GAL. 2 REDMOND LINDEN ............ 2 1/2'88 ................ ................... DATE: 4 /30/q• FILE NAME: L10100VU7WG PROJECT NO. pec*ml LANDSCAPE MAN WEST 25 Leo M. Evans 2248 Glacier Lane WOOD x"" Santa Maria, Ca. 93454 (805) 937-2151 GAL ,:- •:^:'•'`'`} . X Developer: ............. VIEMJ04LJM 7 GAL. ..................... --- ATt- 4 AUSTRIAN PINE .. ......... ...... 6 WHITE PINE SIZES NOTED .............. SIZES NOTED 13 TWERESE BLIGNET ROSE -.- 7 2 GAL. 15 SARGENT WIGw5uSW K. 2 JAPANESE, TREE LILAC... CRANBERRY 5 .... .... ... .. . . �O. :­"� _­1 ........ ..... '14 Ba . .. .. ..... .... .. .. ........... Is WINGED ELIONYMS . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 GAL 86 25 '17' -V 251M .2 REDMOhID.LIkDEN 2 1/2' BB a,.,.,..,o. •,..L. o 3 BLACK WILLS SPRUCE 8 TWERESE BUGNET ROSE 14 NAN%IYBERRY %AfQ5URNLJM ?AALm_ WH �\ \ 5 GAL. 2 REDMOND LINDEN ............ 2 1/2'88 ................ ................... DATE: 4 /30/q• FILE NAME: L10100VU7WG PROJECT NO. pec*ml LANDSCAPE MAN WEST W SCALES: 1' =50' HOR 1' =5' VIER r••IAUKES LAKE NOTES, 4•' I> ALL -A-.— HTTNCS 6 TDRAMS TO BE N nrl,e CONFORMANCE WITN T,E CRY OF EDNA STANDARDS. 7�ALL OTUTY C —CTONS TO BE N CONFORMANLE _ WRN THE CRY OF EONA STANDARDS. >ALL NEW WATERMAN TO BE CONSTRUCTED WRN A 70 SCALE CRAONC PLAN (EAST) roa 7,5' COVER. O c 0 +00 1+00 3 +00 4 +00 5 +00 6 +00 7 +00 8 +00 q +00 10 +00 _ ---- -- __ __--------- ....... _ ........ - - - _- - _ Olde Vernon Estate Homes on Hawkes Lake Vernon Avenue at Olinger Road Edina. Minnesota 0,19 CRY of EDINA MINNESOTA Owner: Leo M. Evans 2248 Glacier Lane Santa Maria, Ca. 93454 (805) 937 -2151 Developer: Philip S. Dommer The Philip Stephen Co.'s 2805 Forestdale Road New Brighton, MN 55112 (812) 804 -0937 Architect /Planner Perry R. Bolin 1885 University Ave. Suite 50 St. Paul, Mn. 55104 844 -1173 Fax 844 -1887 N4�Ne®L Nwm � nrl,e C7.1 SIB 0.N! OUTH WY --- -... .. i WM.; S TO t;L�F _ - 70 SCALE CRADNC PLAN (WEST) C3.3 70 SCALE CRAONC PLAN (EAST) �..� q35 E STREET L STORM SEWER PLAN C7.1 OETAL AC-eT f q10 —, i 'q10 q10 .0 - c LANDSCAPE PLAN (EAST) LU TLI K q15 _ ql5 SCALES: THIS :PROFILE i I F 1! =100' HOR \ i q30:: 17 =10' VIER �� q05 I q00 -6. �' q00 i q10 � :� q 10 Q; q25 PQOPlAED0. PROFILE SqO q00 D ` q05 q05 CD :114' a- PVC IN 0.4 0% 47 1 q20 � w t 'Q WC.Ff ROAD U q20 q0 0 ` q 0 0 1 e m �f4ST4NC 0. PROFLE n q15 — a- — q+5 105' - a' PVC 0 OAOX: Sq5 m o f 1 'Sq5 Fa q10 —y i 8 ._......_.._. .9.__..__.._..- :.— _- _.— :- - --+—� ...._.:.�3:�- a,_p17C ® 1.0% .. 65. -C ®a�YV ._._._ .. \ 170' - B• Pvc ✓ i - ` Q P O v S ® LOX 1 f f 1 t q05 r 50 - — 8, PV.L� q05 70j OUT OF ff1T0 BE O.I.P. - 885 ,- v< CD k_ , q00 WM.(VERnio AVE. a W) Y 2po a• P q25 Ara' ' q00 3 1880 ._.__._.. -� - - -- - -' + -- - -� — - - -�— — - ---_ _ -- — — -- - ?. - 8-; f � VC ® 40K 040z gq5 Sq5 875 . �_-_.__ _ }..........— _>___•�------ - - - - -q20 - -- _ V\ 0 : m O yr 8q0 :�.. ...... q15 8q0 :3� a. 0 +00 1+00 3 +00 4 +00 5 +00 6 +00 7 +00 8 +00 q +00 10 +00 _ ---- -- __ __--------- ....... _ ........ - - - _- - _ Olde Vernon Estate Homes on Hawkes Lake Vernon Avenue at Olinger Road Edina. Minnesota 0,19 CRY of EDINA MINNESOTA Owner: Leo M. Evans 2248 Glacier Lane Santa Maria, Ca. 93454 (805) 937 -2151 Developer: Philip S. Dommer The Philip Stephen Co.'s 2805 Forestdale Road New Brighton, MN 55112 (812) 804 -0937 Architect /Planner Perry R. Bolin 1885 University Ave. Suite 50 St. Paul, Mn. 55104 844 -1173 Fax 844 -1887 N4�Ne®L Nwm � nrl,e C7.1 SIB 0.N! C3.1 SO SCALE CRADNC PLAN C7.7 70 SCALE CRADNC PLAN (WEST) C3.3 70 SCALE CRAONC PLAN (EAST) C4.1 SAN. SEWER Q WATERMN N PLAN C4.7 STREET L STORM SEWER PLAN C7.1 OETAL AC-eT LLI LANDSCAPE PLAN (WEST) LL7 LANDSCAPE PLAN (EAST) LU TLI LANDSCAPE DETAL SNEET TREE PRESERVATION PLAN wE I- 7/D CRY SLMMTAL 7/76 CITY COMIENTS 4 /30 STORM SEWER 7/3/47 CITY REVIE W 7/4)/47 FNAL CITY REVIEW � oN.L NNY .N.NAPOONr N.,,a„ 7n46 rm EeNle e.In1 [o .uN.BEe T..I.a 0.k Nf�m �eizNi•.- T27i•. r.. /e.�.leiiN�s alse •v�NI DATE: 9/30/% FILE NAME: C40100VLMC PROJECT NO. P546001 SAMTARY SEWER & WATERMAN PLAN C4.1 ......... ............................... ' ----.....................................................................................................................................................................................................---...................................................................................................................................................................... ............................... REPLAa EX. C"%X ,J_ -_-..- -- --. .. . ._ ..... AS lx%CTEO By T* EAGTEER� . .. ....._.Y...__._._._.Y.. \ W q35 '• non R - Ma.00 L . 3a.87 LE) (: ) gAUKES LAKE q20 •. • 0•10% ._ —__ _- _._.._. —_._ _ Nom _fl.T a1 1 - _ c VPI STA: - 6.30 F VPI EL # 96 .30 F artVE rE« . s000 yT ^' 1007 E 1 NC 70 SCALE CRAO PUN (WEST) S 3 a s y n 920 70 SCALE CRA7NC PLAN (EAST) 895 SAL SEWER & WATEeMM PLAN C4.7 STREET N STORM SEWER PLAN v u VPI STA :. 3.50 LLI LANDSCAPE PLAN (WEST) ! VPI STA ., 8.00 Wf CID c Lu TI.1 LADSCAPE PETAL 9eET TQEE PRESERVATION PLAN F F . VPI EL : 470.00 _. vPI EL - A10.00 no.00 E q15 1 — - CLAM iEI+ - • 000 : _._ � � _ q15: 890 i — q10 q I - -- - : -� a — — 9 I5 -- —' g , --T, — -� - — — _ —\- E�TNC n -- — - PRaPEE --s - q10: — - -- `8S5 -- i . '` i an d w m 905 \: a < d mi0 i— Ua: — a y/ 1 ^ :. q05 m 1:860 q00 905 905: :900 9 g95 0 +00 1 +00 2 +00 3 +00 4 +00 5 +00 6 +00 7 +00 8 +00 9 +00 10 +00 11 +00 Olde Vernon Edate 6 Im on Hawk« Lake Vernon Avenue at Olinger Road Edina, Minnesota CITY CIF EDINA MINNESOTA Owner: Leo M. Evans 2248 Glacier lane Santa Maria, Ca. 93454 (805) 937 -2151 Developer: Philip S. Dommer The Philip Stephen Co.'s 2605 Forestdale Road New Brighton, MN 55112 (612) 604 -0937 Architect /Planner Perry R. Bolin 1885 University Ave. Suite 50 St. Paul, Mn. 55104 644 -1173 Fax 644 -1887 an �N.rrNO, 7/17 CRY SIBMTTAL C7.1 SITE PLAN Cal SO SCALE CRAONC PLAN p. 7 NC 70 SCALE CRAO PUN (WEST) C3] 70 SCALE CRA7NC PLAN (EAST) C4.1 SAL SEWER & WATEeMM PLAN C4.7 STREET N STORM SEWER PLAN C7.1 DETAIL MEET LLI LANDSCAPE PLAN (WEST) LL7 LANMAPE PLAN (EAST) Lu TI.1 LADSCAPE PETAL 9eET TQEE PRESERVATION PLAN an �N.rrNO, 7/17 CRY SIBMTTAL 7/76 C1 COMMENTS 4/30 STORM SEWER OPTS 7/7/47 CITY REVIEW 3/18/47 ENAL CITY REVEW �oNAVM ru.IARevrt Nevlem o. T li, ssf�aro Ln.In ;nee C ,]91 e IeI PI �] -sx'rs .�., /e.�lelx MSS a0� •] GATE: 4/30/% FILE NAME: C40700VLOWC PROJECT NO. Ps%001 STREET 3T STORM SEWER PLAN C4.2 CL R RIPRAP REOUtM jr TO EV 4 Dmc Er TO ]r• R D,Lt M' TD .r 1E cmc 34• .ND Lt a c.Wc ItU. cwt ,m.v W .Ppi PLAN e.Rm IMJ \�[IL1CR RAMIFY SECTI(1N A -A L[1ER [1IL [R RA T REMKD I OER RIMW M E LAYERS OF ]amt NZW1 [AERIE RIpRM OR ED 1 [[Lt[R [ ET SECTION B -B LINER k IMAP AT OUTLET NO SCALE az.t -ERR S.r Ger R— v STO-ID ?> rky o.e.r..rt Dr PW P.erHr f a.cM..0. I— Net eb ml.m.rr .Itrr .Ml ,— TRASH TIMRD Il- IY f• L.• IY A• L4' 1 V.Y A• 1' 1 v.Y r r t wY r r N FLARED END SECTION AND TRASH GUARD NO SCALE v_I-m mvNnn s,cDE. rVE STAEI& CR MY cONCnLONe ... mAremr srx. f.. P rp+m .low. - AM 1 I ymyrn re lrraam LfeTARS an VET COORge � PPE'BEDDNG t� Nr R -]Of7 . rr T� r 7 -/. Ra.. C c:r III . r .. r rte,. SECTION A –A t� CURB TRANSITION ® CATCH BASH AROtlfY lY ( ,qRn W rATH rNAb AlODMA\4 ODaa r rasa � yr muwD wr r.om ra ..w .R T mllfDS eAf r.Wr rTa n v ARTac.a TAa Inmr am a 71 v >N4cr ou.ur wAm m NwewTR r rm Tulr.w I!1 STANDAR STREET SECTION rf.r+ r Y0. Vr4 h ° + T 06® b ! \ 1 � � J – – SLEtTg1NTABLE O Da rp . VRR Ar 4.M41 Ar Au rapaf MM armor wf o ea °Ow raii�'1O1 :bar� me Ar ram .Ave us D .rr r urcYK n�"owipsa°i1aa,.afaLC armr .m STANDARD CURB OETALS I�I!1 ram . ®faTV IT9E0 T ArR,o v m rvrA vaN M �r Loam armor morn a.. - TnY Tiei° = 1° Y • EDI We a NO �Aaun morn rvvo4 T4e+ee T PM W. SO Y • 4m CATS VALVE Born v Ac w r sisf R.~weam%ewr, 1t4� TRY m0 YPV� f00T�f MOpO�°f w m°dRO m °r` � i wa svr� rwr _ _ w "it VALVES ST012M SEWER CATCH BASIN MAN HM � 00-M m NO SCALE a40 J ,Y E ERLO Yf r0 J mTp aC1 � �r°D D�maa sea m ma �M Ir4»'1�� T»u s rw . T"w Amw freRly. Nc rwaa 1 7 STORM SEWER MANIOLE (DEEP) 1� GATE VALVE & BOX INSTALLATION l 3 ..pgmis LM AI luau Cf.Tlm n� ,ua . .r..uan�Tm..nrr a Tao r +�may.NN�ln�tn _ . IrIR rR rlre E, nasr7i. m a.vti.D vu I^ HYDRANT & CATE VALVE INSTALLATION �R AND WATER SERVICE CONNECTION ITS m .. �M. 0.4W m4rEf r� f rm1 AYOi iLL��?M�]iY(IYi /f 1[r,�MM o ara, iwa oT.- flarra STANDAeD OUTSDE DROP MANH0.E NaN mrm. �n r eRirin c�`o re�P�°R o�, Rnaarvan. R.o m t~i °Kr r.v°Oin :I aD�R a .DYE= . fwu v.rr nr�NC. rem... frt� ,arm Yw M m rt,. m rraEf f mr wD mYrm T wai m. cm, oer» T1 m��.re:o• A o+Ai f�ac ra SGTp A , LOR i/rmr _ !LC'IDN R-R A STANDARD $AN7ARY $EWER MANIOLE Olde Vernon Estate Homss on Hawkes Lake Vernon Avenue at Olinger Road Edina, Minnesota �r WY OF EDINA IESOTA Leo M. Evans 2248 Glacier lane Santa Maria, Ca. 93454 (605)937 -2151 Developer: Philip S. Dommer The Philip Stephen Co.'s 2605 Forestdale Road New Brighton, MN 55112 (612) 604 -0937 Architect /Planner Perry R. Bolin 1885 University Ave. Suite 50 St. Paul, Mn. 55104 644 -1173 Fax 644 -1887 �e.mfEm , - LO/VLSNC. ,dw O mfrV. .e°- ial%—rm f m rrvf~ C3 " rmnR+e rn v� n4„r.e r1Rn .rho C7.2 *—r—. C3.3 70 SCALP CRAONC PLAN (EAST) r— Nrre — ...m. Im _ SAK SEWER @ WATERMAN PLAN C4.7 STREET & STORM SEWER PLAN �R AND WATER SERVICE CONNECTION ITS m .. �M. 0.4W m4rEf r� f rm1 AYOi iLL��?M�]iY(IYi /f 1[r,�MM o ara, iwa oT.- flarra STANDAeD OUTSDE DROP MANH0.E NaN mrm. �n r eRirin c�`o re�P�°R o�, Rnaarvan. R.o m t~i °Kr r.v°Oin :I aD�R a .DYE= . fwu v.rr nr�NC. rem... frt� ,arm Yw M m rt,. m rraEf f mr wD mYrm T wai m. cm, oer» T1 m��.re:o• A o+Ai f�ac ra SGTp A , LOR i/rmr _ !LC'IDN R-R A STANDARD $AN7ARY $EWER MANIOLE Olde Vernon Estate Homss on Hawkes Lake Vernon Avenue at Olinger Road Edina, Minnesota �r WY OF EDINA IESOTA Leo M. Evans 2248 Glacier lane Santa Maria, Ca. 93454 (605)937 -2151 Developer: Philip S. Dommer The Philip Stephen Co.'s 2605 Forestdale Road New Brighton, MN 55112 (612) 604 -0937 Architect /Planner Perry R. Bolin 1885 University Ave. Suite 50 St. Paul, Mn. 55104 644 -1173 Fax 644 -1887 �e.mfEm , .aT I'DL. CRY SIBrrTTAL C7.1 SITE PLAN C3 " 50 30 SCALE CRA004 PI C7.2 70 SCALE CRADNC -PLAN (WEST) C3.3 70 SCALP CRAONC PLAN (EAST) C4.1 _ SAK SEWER @ WATERMAN PLAN C4.7 STREET & STORM SEWER PLAN 1:7.1 OVAL " ET LLI LA.DSCAPE PLµ (WEST) LL7 LANDSCAPE PLAN (EAST) LIJ TLI LAWSCAPE PETAL SHEET TREE PRESERVATION PLAN DATR IraV41Or 7/0 CRY SIBrrTTAL 7j15 CTTY COM"E"TS q /30 STORM SEWER OvTDr13 7 /3/q7 CrrY REVEw 3/e /R7 fNAL CRY REVEW OLLrtr MrNARlM IavR!YE m• a rxanc.LrRSA r o. 7 I/ 7/V5 V' 4T. E.pru.,1.1 mp... •... T.......Y 7.m I.1H1 - 3—el.r /e.�leliH�s 's,Spl : DATE: q /30/gb FILE NAME: C70100VNOWC PROJECT NO. P9%W1 DETAIL SHEET C7.1 a Ir / . I. Landscape Contractor shell visit site prior to submitting bid to become 18" spread B.B. 2' spread 58. 2 1/2 ' spread BE. 3' spread B.B. completely Familiar with site conditions. 2. It Is the responslbmtq or the Landscape Contractor to Identlry all ' underground cables, conduits, wires, etc. on the property. 3. No planting will be Installed until all grading and construction has been INCLUDING) completed In the Immediate area. 4. Topsoil for all sad areas to be Furnished and Installed by others. The 4' B.B. Landscape Contractor shall be responsible For Fine grading prior to the 5' B.B. sodding operations. _ 5. If there Is a dlecrepancy between the number or plants shown on the plan 1' B.B. and the number or plants shown In the plant list, the number of plants on a, BB. the plan will take precedence. 6. All plants *hell be of epeclmen quallty, and approved by the Owner's 10' B.B. Representative prior to Installation. Plante shall have normal, well - _ developed branch systems, a vigorous Fibrous root system. They &hall be 60 sound, healthy, vigorous plants free from defects, disfiguring knots, sllnscad Injuries, abrasions or the bark plant diseases, Insect eggs, borers. 18" B.B. and all Forms or Infestations. All plants shell be nrsery groan. 1. Repair all damage to property From planting operations at no cost to the Owner. a. The Landscape Contractor shall replace at no charge, any tree, shrub, evergreen, or groundcover which Falls to live through the first calendar 3' B.B. year From the time of final acceptance by the Owner's Representative. % All plants shall be alive and In normal satioractory growing condition at the end of the guarantee period. 9. A three inch depth of shredded hardwood bark mulch over Geotech weed barrier will be Installed around all trees and In shrub bads. Maintenance 5' B.B. edging will be Installed In a 3' diameter ring around all deciduous trees and 12 around all shrub beds unless noted otherwlee. _ IQ). All maintenance edger shall be cobra vinyl edging. - II. iltapping material shall be First quallty, heavy, waterproof crepe paper - manufactured For this purpose. Tram shall be wrapped prior to.12 /1 6 and removed after 5/I. . 12. Tree guying In all areas shall be optional. The Landscape Contractor 215" rent Mall be responsible for maintaining trees In a straight upright condition 3 for a period or twelve months rollowlnlg Installation. 13. All planting areas receiving groundcover, perennials, annual*, and vines - shall receive a minimum or an e' depth of planting soil (40% topsoil, 40% peat or manure, 20% sand). - 14. All sod supplied shall be of the highest quallty cultured sod available. - - 4 -- _ Landscape Contractor shall be responsible For coordinating the first watering of all rreshly sodded lawn areas. After the first watering the 13 Owner takes responslblllty For watering sod. I5. All sodded areas shall be irrigated with an automatic underground I Quart co t. - Irrigation system. Irrigation plane to be prepared by the Landscape - 55 Contractor and approved by the Civil Engineer. 16. All Isolated tree planting locations and planting bads shall be cultivated IB by tilling to a minimum depth of 10'. Soll amendments shall be applied during cultivation. - 17. Landscape Contractor shall use cultivated and amended Boll excavated T5 from planted holes For backflll Boll. Remove all debrle Including rocks larger than 3' dia. WEED BARRIER BACKFILL SOIL MULCH NOTE: REMOVE CLASS V MATERIAL IF PRESENT IN PARKING ISLAND. REPLACE WITH AMENDED SOILS SUITABLE FOR PLANTING. MOUND BEDDING AREA ABOVE CURB AS INDICATED. TYPICAL PLANTED PARKING ISLAND SODDED AREA CONC. WALK OR CURB EDGE PLANTING DETAILS FOR ISOLATED PLANTING LOCATIONS WEED A BARRIER A I BACKFILL SOIL FINISHED MULCH GRADE EE3B BALLED 4 BURLAPPED CONTAINER STOCK STOCK I. SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE. I. SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE. 2. PROCEED WITH CORRECTIVE PRUNING AS 2. PROCEED WITH CORRECTIVE PRUNING DIRECTED BY ENGINEER a5-DIRECTED BY- ENGINEER 3. SET PLANT ON UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL, 3. REMOVE CONTAINER AND SCORE OR PRUNE OR THOROUGHLY COMPACTED BACKFILL OUTSIDE OF SOIL MASS TO REDIRECT SOIL AT THE SAME DEPTH (IF PROPER) CIRCLING FIBROUS ROOTS AS NECESSARY. AS IT WAS GROWN IN THE NURSERY. 4.- SET PLANT ON UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL, 4. PLANT SHALL BE PLACED IN PLANTING HOLE OR THOROUGHLY COMPACTED BACK71LL WITH BURLAP AND WIRE BASKET, IF USED, SOIL AT THE SAME DEPTH (IF PROPER) INTACT. ONCE IN PLACE, THE PLANT SHALL AS IT WAS GROIN IN THE NURSERY. BE BACKFILLED TO WITHIN 12" OF THE TOP 5. APPLY WATER TO SETTLE PLANTS AND OF THE ROOTBALL AND WATERED. THETOP FILL VOIDS THEN CONSTRUCT 3" DEPTH LOOPS OF THE WIRE BASKETS SHALL BE WATERING BASIN. REMOVED AND THE BURLAP SHALL BE FOLDED OR CUT BACK 6. WATER THOROUGHLY WITHIN 2 HOURS. 5. PLUMB AND BACKFILL WITH THE BACKFILL 1. PLACE MULCH WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE SOIL SPECIFIED. SECOND WATERING UNLESS SOIL MOISTURE 6. APPLY WATER TO SETTLE PLANTS AND IS EXCESSIVE. FILL VOIDS THEN CONSTRUCT 3" DEPTH WATERING BASIN. 1. WATER THOROUGHLY WITHIN 2 HOURS. S. PLACE MULCH WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE SECOND WATERING UNLESS SOIL MOISTURE IS EXCESSIVE. 9. BIODEGRADABLE TWINE MAY BE LEFT ON AS SUPPORT BETWEEN THE ROOT BALL AND ROOT COLLAR UNTIL THE ENDOF THE PLANT ESTABLISHMENT PERIOD AT WHICH TIME IT MUST BE CUT AND TOTALLY REMOVED FROM THE ROOT COLLAR, THE TWINE MUST BE TIED OR RETIED TO MID -LEVEL LOOPS OR POINTS ON THE BASKET. USE OF NONBIODEGRADABLE TWINE SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED. NOTES: I . THE PLANTING DETAILS REPRESENT- ADEQUATELY DRAINED SOIL CONDITIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHOULD EXERCISE DISCRETION IN SETTING PLANTS 1 " -3" HIGHER IN POORLY DRAINED SOILS. 2. ON 2:1 SLOPES OR GREATER DO NOT CONSTRUCT THE UPHILL HALF OF THE WATERING BASIN. 3. ON WET, POORLY DRAINED SOILS, DO NOT CONSTRICT WATERING BASIN. - -- - 4. THE CONTRACTOR 15 RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING ADEQUATE DRAINAGE IN HEAVY POORLY DRAINED OR IMPERVIOUS SOILS. 5. PLANTS SHOULD BE SET AT THE PROPER DEPTH WHEREBY THE BEGINNING TAPER OF THE ROOT FLARE 15 AT THE SAME ELEVATION AS THE FINISHED SOIL GRADE. THIS SHOULD BE THE SAME DEPTH AS THE PLANTS WERE GROWN AT IN THE NURSERY. NOTE THAT THE ROOTS OF BALLED AND BURLAPPED PLANTS ARE UNACCEPTABLE WHEN THEY ARE COVERED BY MORE THAN 4" OF SOIL IN THE TOP OF THE BALL. 6. DELAY MULCH PLACEMENT IF NECESSARY TO ALLOW MORE TIME FOR EXCESS SOIL MOISTURE TO EVAPORATE FROM PLANTING AREAS BEFORE PLACING MULCH. - FINISHED GRADE TYPICAL EDGE DETAIL 9 SODDED AREAS PLANTING HOLE DIMENSIONS (MINIMUM WIDTH DOES NOT APPLY IN MASS PLANTING BEDS) 18" spread B.B. 2' spread 58. 2 1/2 ' spread BE. 3' spread B.B. MINR'%M APPROWMATE 1 1/2 BR MOLE WIDTH HOLE DEPTH PLANT TYPE PLANT SIZE (INONES) (INCWE9) (UP TO AND A B INCLUDING) 12 I6 EVERGREEN TREES 3' B.B. 42 1 4' B.B. 51 13 5' B.B. b0 13 _ 6' B.B. 66 15 1' B.B. 12 16 a, BB. BI 18 9' B.B. 90 20 10' B.B. 102 21 SHADE E FLOWERING Tocco. EVERGREE5HRJ5S (UPRIGHT) I" BR 54 14 18" spread B.B. 2' spread 58. 2 1/2 ' spread BE. 3' spread B.B. 14- 1 1/2 BR 66 15 1 3/4 " BR 12 16 2" BR 64 19 2" B.B. 12 I6 2 1/2 " B.B. 84 19 3" B.B. 96 20 3 1/2 " B.B. 114 23 4" B.B. 126 25 2' B.B. 36 9 3' B.B. 48 12 4' B.B. 63 14 MULCH OVER WEED BARRIER WIDTH OF HOLE EXCAVATION SHALL EXTEND A MINIMUM OF 6 INCHES BEYOND THE PLANTS ROOT SYSTEM. PREPARED PLANTING BED AND BACKFILL SOIL (THOROUGHLY TILLED AND LOOSENED) MAINTENANCE EDGING (TYP.) FINISHED GRADE �1 TYPICAL EDGE DETAIL g PLANTING BED Olde Vernon Estate Homes on Hawkes Lake Vernon Avenue at Olinger Road Edina. Minnesota A� : A � tI MINNESOTA Leo M. Evans 2248 Glacier Lane Santa Maria, Ca. 93454 (805) 937 -2151 Developer: Philip S. Dommer The Philip Stephen Co.'s 2605 Forestdale Road New Brighton. MN 55112 (612) 604 -0937 Architect /Planner Perry R Bolin 1885 University Ave. Suite 50 St. Paul, Mn. 55104 644 -1173 Fax 644 -1887 % psalm EVERGREEN SHRUBS (SPREADING) 18" spread B.B. 2' spread 58. 2 1/2 ' spread BE. 3' spread B.B. 30 36 42 48 8 13 II 12 DECIDUOUS 18" B.R. 30 8 _._[3.2._ SHRUBS 2' BR 33 9 SAN. SEWER a WArMAN PLAN C4.7 3' BR 42 It LI.1 LANMAPE PLAN (WEST) 4' BR 48 12 LANDSCAPE OETAL %EET TREE PRESERVATgJ PLAN - 5' BR 54 14 _ 6' BR 60 14 18" B.B. 21 T 2' B.B. 30 8 3' B.B. 36 % 4' B.B. 42 11 5' B.B. 48 12 6' B.B. 54 14 CONTAINER GROWN Cellpadte 6 25 PLANTS 215" rent T 3 35" cont 10 3 4V- cont. . "II _. - - 4 -- _ 45" cant 13 4 - - - - I Quart co t. - - IS _ - 55 ' -1 coat. IB 6 =.L 23 T5 9 coot. 29 as 5 cont. 30 II �1 corn. 31 II Me coot. 44 14 '15 coot. 45 15 -20 colt. 60 n 45 con. 12 16 MULCH OVER WEED BARRIER WIDTH OF HOLE EXCAVATION SHALL EXTEND A MINIMUM OF 6 INCHES BEYOND THE PLANTS ROOT SYSTEM. PREPARED PLANTING BED AND BACKFILL SOIL (THOROUGHLY TILLED AND LOOSENED) MAINTENANCE EDGING (TYP.) FINISHED GRADE �1 TYPICAL EDGE DETAIL g PLANTING BED Olde Vernon Estate Homes on Hawkes Lake Vernon Avenue at Olinger Road Edina. Minnesota A� : A � tI MINNESOTA Leo M. Evans 2248 Glacier Lane Santa Maria, Ca. 93454 (805) 937 -2151 Developer: Philip S. Dommer The Philip Stephen Co.'s 2605 Forestdale Road New Brighton. MN 55112 (612) 604 -0937 Architect /Planner Perry R Bolin 1885 University Ave. Suite 50 St. Paul, Mn. 55104 644 -1173 Fax 644 -1887 % psalm a.vr Irma C7.1 SITE PLAN C3.1 50 SCALE CRADW PLAN _._[3.2._ .70 SCALE - C4A04C'PLAN (WEST) _. C3.7 20 SCALE CRAONC PLAN (EAST) 411 SAN. SEWER a WArMAN PLAN C4.7 STREET a STORn SEWER RAN C7.1 DE TAL SIEET LI.1 LANMAPE PLAN (WEST) L1.7 LANMAPE PLAN (EAST) LIJ TI.I LANDSCAPE OETAL %EET TREE PRESERVATgJ PLAN urn II�..IP. 7/O CIrY SUBMITTAL 7/76 CnY corm rs 9/30 STOrat SEWER OPTI" 3/3/97 OTT REVIEW 3/41/97 FNAL CITY REVEW �.s.eArnA - �i sJOa r'P. eeyn m..n c L.I o.Y. ,zvl Iti12Nz5- 92'Ii[.'aI.• /e�lalzl��5I59 � DATE: 4/70/% FILE NAMES Lb PROJECT NO. P111011115001 LANDSCAPE DETAIL SWEET L1.3 J E • SLY IFENM pelft CA. sNe ND GRADING/EROSION CONTROL NOTES SITE SYMIXILS EKSINC NEW CON' SPO, fte-10. C=== vaERCRDUa 3TRLCTLR6 RAILROAD Coca% .1 f ............... mnr." P.vNc camm,e ............. eDM OP IAVIf SLOPE PREC'm ....... Kon.nE FENOW omw eAL RET—C WALL or 1 TREE -SAVE SOL eam.0 DOORWAr semnew cowrem Kwe —1 — C-TR- Pow" PoLe TRee PROTECTION Ekt!C�O SCALE NO,F REFERENCE farlx DEIAL COORP%A16 POW 'All w-, TREES NOTED FOR TREE PROTECTION ARE TO BE SAVED ALL OT1•ERS ARE' TO BE REMOVED —0, vv� 01 014 141 0 All C-) Or) &C P" IN �00 y �, V� Ao NORTH 0 50 100 SCALE IN FEET 01de Vernon Estate m Imes an+1awkee Lake Vernon Avenue at Olinger Road Edina, Minnesota DITY OF EDINA MINNESOTA Owner: Leo M. Evans 2248 Glacier Lane Santa Maria, Ca. 93454 (805) 937-2151 Developer: Philip S. Dommer The Philip Stephen Co.'s 2605 Forestdale Road New Brighton, MN 55112 (612) 604-0937 Architect/Planner Perry R. Bolin 1885 University Ave. Suite 50 St. Paul, Mn. 55104 644-1173 Fax 644-1887 C2.1 SYE PLAN C3.1 50 SCALE CRADW PLAN C3.2 20 SCALE CRADW PLAN (WEST) C" 70 SCALE GRADING PLAN (CAST) C4J SAN. SEWN • WATERMAN PLAN C4.2 STREET • STORM SEWER PLAN C7.1 a LLI �00 y �, V� Ao NORTH 0 50 100 SCALE IN FEET 01de Vernon Estate m Imes an+1awkee Lake Vernon Avenue at Olinger Road Edina, Minnesota DITY OF EDINA MINNESOTA Owner: Leo M. Evans 2248 Glacier Lane Santa Maria, Ca. 93454 (805) 937-2151 Developer: Philip S. Dommer The Philip Stephen Co.'s 2605 Forestdale Road New Brighton, MN 55112 (612) 604-0937 Architect/Planner Perry R. Bolin 1885 University Ave. Suite 50 St. Paul, Mn. 55104 644-1173 Fax 644-1887 an Ilarwv, C2.1 SYE PLAN C3.1 50 SCALE CRADW PLAN C3.2 20 SCALE CRADW PLAN (WEST) C" 70 SCALE GRADING PLAN (CAST) C4J SAN. SEWN • WATERMAN PLAN C4.2 STREET • STORM SEWER PLAN C7.1 PETAL Speer LLI LANDSCAPE PLAN (WEST) LL? LANDSCAPE PLAN (EAST) LL3 TI.1 LANDSCAPE DETAIL %Efit TREE PRESERVATION PLAN an Ilarwv, 7/17 7/76 9/70 3/3/q7 3/18/97 Ory SLEIMTTAL OTT COMMENTS STORM SEWER OPTONS C" REVIEW FINAL CITY REVIEW 7/r7/q6 —df— E., 15500 DATE: 4/30/46 FILE NAPIE: TJOKWILOWC PROJECT NO. pg46001 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN T1.1 'DO ERS Co%3tAC"- r� REPORURECOM M EN DATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # II I. E. From: Craig Larsen Consent ❑ City Planner Information Only ❑ Date: April 21,1997 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: Amend Rezoning PRD -3, ® To Council Planned Residence District to PRD -4, Action ❑ Motion Planned Residence District. Hans ❑x Resolution Kuhlman. 5120 -5124 France Avenue ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Approve amended Final Rezoning by changing the zoning district from PRD -3 to PRD- 4.,_ P_lanne_d_Residence_D.istr_ict. Info /Background: The Council will note from the Planning Commission minutes that the Commission action was to approve the request, but not to change the Zoning designation. The Commission felt the increased density could be handled by a variance. Since the meeting, staff has consulted with the City Attorney, and it is his opinion that we can not grant a variance for density. Consequently, it would be necessary for the Council to amend the Rezoning, as recommended by staff, in order to approve the request to add one unit to the building. DRAFT MINUTES P.C. MEETING APRIL 2, 1997 Z -96 -2 Final Rezoning, R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District to PRD4, Planned Residence District. 5120 and 5124 France Avenue. Hans Kuhlman Mr. Larsen informed the Commission the City Council - approved Final Rezoning plans for this seven (7) unit condominium building on December 16, 1996. The approved plans illustrated, four units on the first floor and three units on the upper floor. The developer has returned to the City asking for approval of a revised Final Development Plan. Mr. Larsen explained the revised plan would increase the number of units in the building from seven to eight. This would be accomplished by redesigning the second floor to accommodate four units in a lay out similar to the four unit first floor plan. The building exterior and the site plan would not change. All. modifications would occur internally. Plans for the approved three unit second floor and the. proposed four unit layout are attached. Mr,. Larsen pointed out the Planned Residence (PRD -3) District requires a total site area of 29,200 square feet to support an eight unit development. The subject site has an area of 27,646 square feet. In order to allow an eight unit development it would be necessary to change the zoning from PRD -3 to PRD -4. A PRD- 4 zoning would require a site of 17,200 square feet. The proposed building complies with all other zoning ordinance requirements Mr. Larsen concluded the question before the Commission is "what level of density is appropriate for this site and future redevelopments along France Avenue ? ". The proponent has submitted information showing his proposal is less dense than other multi - family projects in the area. Mr. Larsen said staff agrees with the proponent that four units per floor, rather than three, makes more sense within the proposed footprint. It is also true that the passer -by could not detect the difference if the extra unit is added to the building. Mr.''Larsen noted staff did not initially support the eight unit townhouse proposal, based on density and building setback issues. However, the redesign has solved the parking and building set back problems that caused the original development to crowd the site. In light of these changes staff can support the revised plan subject to: 1. Landscape Bond 2. Watershed District Permit 3. Developers Agreement The proponent, Mr. Hans Kuhlman was present to respond to questions. Commissioner McClelland asked Mr. Kuhlman the square footage of the proposed units. Mr. Kuhlman responded the square footage of the units are between 1860 - 1900 square feet. Commissioner Runyan said in his opinion this layout works better than the seven unit development that was previously approved. Mr. Kuhlman acknowledged that is true. Chairman Johnson asked Mr. Larsen how Mr. Kuhlman came up with the number seven in the first place. Mr. Larsen explained the previous proposal had more of a townhouse feel, and had some setback issues. Staff and the Commission decided no more than seven townhouse units could comfortably fit on this site (Mr. Kuhlman originally requested 8 units). Continuing, Mr. Larsen pointed out the building is now a condominium style building, which solved the previous setback issues. Commissioner Runyan asked Mr. Kuhlman if this building is a true condominium building (homestead) or will it be rental property. Mr. Kuhlman said the building is a condominium, and the units will be sold. Continuing, Mr. Kuhlman pointed out the previous proposal had three units on the top floor, and the layout just did not work efficiently. Commissioner Workinger asked if the density between PRD -3 and PRD -4 is much different. Mr. Kuhlman said a PRD -3 zoning would allow 7.6 units on a site this size, pointing out the proposal before you this evening is for eight units. Mr. Larsen interjected a PRD -3 zoning would place the proposal at the high end (.6 units over) and traditionally the City has rounded down, which is the reason for the request for a PRD -4 zoning. Continuing, Mr. Larsen said there is a difference between PRD -3 and PRD -4. PRD -4 allows a denser development, and the setbacks relate to building height. PRD -3 allows three stories or 40 feet, whichever is less. Mr. Kuhlman told Members of the Commission with the change in the number of units the site retains the 16 underground parking stalls with five surface parking stalls on site. Mr. Kuhlman also noted on- street parking is also available. Commissioner McClelland said in her opinion the site should retain the PRD -3 zoning. She added she has a concern if this property is zoned to PRD -4 and is not developed by this developer another developer could come in and propose a building with more than eight units, taller, and in her opinion more than eight units is too dense for the amount of land present. Commissioner McClelland moved to recommend final rezoning and final plat approval subject to the plans presented, subject to staff conditions, noting the change in unit number from seven to eight, with the further recommendation that the site retain the PRD -3 zoning. Commissioner Lonsbury seconded the motion. Commissioner Byron asked Mr. Larsen if it is acceptable to retain the PRD -3 zoning to ensure that this site is not developed with more units. He pointed out the PRD -4 zoning allows a higher density development. Mr. Larsen said he is uncertain if it is acceptable. He said the it may be possible for the Council to act on the recommendation of the Commission and grant a variance. Chairman Johnson called the vote. All voted aye; motion carried. Commissioner Workinger asked Mr. Kuhlman when he plans on breaking ground. Mr. Kuhlman said if all goes well we plan to break ground in mid summer or early fall. o Tb = tit AI �N T lwia III rff M. #"a � ST •r GRACE :h U RC _ SCHOOL CITY LI DEC. 1985 Ell.� REZONING N U M B E R Z -96 -2 L O C A T 10 N 5120 and 5124 France Avenue South REQUEST Rezoning R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District to PRD -4, Planned Residence District EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT APRIL 2, 1997 Z -96 -2 Final Rezoning, R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District to PRD4, Planned Residence District. 5120 and 5124 France Avenue. Hans Kuhlman The City Council approved Final Rezoning plans for this-seven (7) unit condominium building on December 16, 1996. The approved plans illustrated four units on the first floor and three units on the upper floor. The developer has returned to the City asking for approval of a revised Final Development Plan. The revised plan would increase the number of units in the building from seven to eight. This would be accomplished by redesigning the second floor to accommodate four units in a lay out similar to the four unit first floor plan. The building exterior and the site plan would not change. All modifications would occur internally. Plans for the approved three unit second floor and the proposed four unit layout are attached. The Planned Residence (PRD -3) District requires a total site area of 29,200 square feet to support an eight unit development. The subject site has an area of 27,646 square feet. In order to allow an eight unit development it would be necessary to change the zoning from PRD -3 to PRD -4. A PRD- 4 zoning would require a site of 17,200 square feet. The proposed building complies with all other zoning ordinance requirements RECOMMENDATION: The question before the Commission is "what level of density is appropriate for this site and future redevelopments along France Avenue ?". The proponent has submitted information showing his proposal is less dense than other multi - family projects in the area. Staff agrees with the proponent that four units per floor, rather than three, makes more sense within the proposed footprint. It is also true that the passer -by could not detect the difference if the extra unit is added to the building. Staff did not initially support the eight unit townhouse proposal, based on density and building setback issues. However, the redesign has solved the parking and building set back problems that caused the original development to crowd the site. In light of these changes staff can support the revised plan subject to: 1. Landscape Bond 2. Watershed District Permit 3. Developers Agreement Hans F. Kuhlmann 5104 Halifax Avenue South Edina, MN 55424 Home (612) 926 -7568 Fax (612) 338 -4723 March 19, 1997 Mr. Craig Larson Director of Planning City of Edina 4801 West 5011 Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 RE: TOWNHOMES OF EDINA Dear Mr. Larson, In December of 1996 the Edina City Council approved the rezoning of 5120 and 5124 France Avenue South from R -1, single Family District to PRD -3, Planned Residential District to allow the development of the properties as a seven unit planned residential development. The existing zoning limitations of seven units on the subject property creates undue hardship on the proposed development due to the physical constraints of laying out seven units with sizes and floorplans acceptable to the market, and places restrictions on the proposed redevelopment far in excess of any other Planned Residential District in the immediate area as demonstrated on exhibit A attached. Attached as exhibit A is a list of nine existing multi - family projects in the 50' Street and France Avenue corridor. Five of the projects are zoned PRD -4 and have an average density of one unit for every 1,369 square feet of land. Four of the projects are zoned PRD -3 and have an average density of one unit for every 2,555 square feet of land. The two properties I am redeveloping total 27, 646 square feet of land, and ifeight units are developed on the property it would result in one unit for every 3,455 square feet of land. a 35.22% increase in land area per unit from the average PRD -3 development in the 50`, Street and France Avenue corridor. EXHIBIT A Existing Multi - Family Project in 50`h and France Avenue Cooridor Pro e 1) White Oaks: 3901 West 49`" St. 2) West 50`b Street 3) Henley: 5000 Halifax Ave. S 4) Lanterns: 4075 West 511 St. 5) Regency: 5100 France Ave. S. 6) 5330 France Ave. S. 7) West 54' Street (west of the 76 gas station) 8) 5412 France Ave. S. 9) 5424 France Ave. S. Zoning ning Lot Size PRD -4 PRD-4 PRD-4 PRD-4 PRD -3 PRD -3 PRD -3 PRD -3 PRD -3 1) Townhomes of Edina PRD -3 36,375 sq. ft. 21,000 sq. ft. 50,587 sq. ft. 61,250 sq. ft. 32,400 sq. ft. 29,300 sq. ft. 15,950 sq. ft. # of Densily Units 32 1 unit per 1,136 sq. ft. 9 1 unit per 2,333 sq. ft. 21 1 unit per 2,421 sq. ft. 44 1 unit per 1,392 sq. ft. 18 1 unit per 1,800 sq. ft. 10 1' unit per 2,930 sq. ft. 5 1 unit per 3,190 sq. ft. 23,800 sq. ft. 11 1 unit per 2,163 sq. ft. 27,170 sq. ft. 14 1 unit per 1,940 sq. ft. PRD -4 average density 1 unit per 1,799 sq. ft. PRD -3 average density 1 unit per 2,555 sq. ft. 27,646 sq. ft. 8 1 unit per 3,455 sq. ft. T.O. LE06E 7.0. LEDGE 1,' -O' 1' -0' 14' 11' -'Y IS' -0• III-b" 20• -e• ,,._a. T.O. LED&E • — — — ---7, :j � iF I i Y leagb - -- I I I I 1 EOUIP I I J FRI 5 I B 6T I I ININS VO I I E V I 1 - - - - - - - - -F } - ------ - -t ° -J - - -- k;4 uuuu _ir- - 1 SH PRECAST BEAM ABOVE 12 X I2 PREGATS COL. TYP --fO------------- 1 PRECAST BEAM ABOVE B _ _ I < < _ I- - - - - - J -------- - - - - -- Li _ T i 12 X I2 PRECATS COL. TY I I TR €NGN DRAIN SEE CIVIL DW65 6ARA6E 1 4" GONG. SLAB TRENCH DRAIN SEE CIVIL PA&S J I F7001 IOXIO ftV. ON I &RAN FILL p I I CONTROL I � I- 4' 1!'-4* 21• -0• M' -0• 14-e• L_ _ 21' -0• 141-61 I -0• _ 5' JANIT R - MEGH PRECAST BEAM ABOVE L 1 -0• n 5' -0' GONG. PAD W/ 2 845 CONT. < 12 X 12 PRECATS COL. TY - - - - - - -- -- - - - -F - - - - -- - - - - -- - -F - - - - -- - - -- --- - - - -�- - ----- - - - - -- - ---- - - - - -- 1 -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -r - -_ �� - - - --;Jl - ------ - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - , I 8 I I1, -2_ I� 14 -•,. 11••2_ B 1 1 L. J — L I, �O GIRDER - - -- - - -- I $ 1 r 1 1 NT r 1 I I, L L J 1e e 1 I I I A I I I I Ia�e 1 I I L J L J A L -- - -� r- I , I — — — — J _ — T.O. LE06E T.O. LEDGE - - -- -- -- -- -- - I - - -- - - --- -- T.O. LEDGE tt - T.O. LEDGE ® NORTH FOUNDATION /GARAGE PLAN I�'-6• _ il•-O• 11' -S• IS' -0• 11• -Y 71• -0• IT -�• 9'-6• �'-6• 4• -2• 6• -0' L 6' -0' 1. W-60,11 S' -O' S' -0• ' -1 ' -O ' -10' L 7• -S• '-6 S' -0' =0' 4'-6• 6' -O• 6' -O• 4' -j' �'-6• - q�- 4- RST FL A3 1 /is " =V —Olt OOR PLAN p7M] LO E IN BED it Mi ' MM iti C � liME I CLOSE 1 E 11 IY /s► t..._ • ts� Mi _ bd \■ 0 PAR I� RST FL A3 1 /is " =V —Olt OOR PLAN p7M] LO E IN BED RST FL A3 1 /is " =V —Olt OOR PLAN l� L 21' -0- -4• II' -9• ID• -0• 11' -7- L 21•-O• I, O ,• -6• -2• 6' -0• 6'..O• 4•,.6/- . -0• 6.•�. . -T .-b ._b. T._S' '-6 5' -0' L54A 4• -6- . 6' -0• 6 -0- 4 -2- 4. , _6• , .6• 4• brick ' 6. MA. — -----� r BED — — - - - - -� r - - --- BEG O I I I I 1 I 1 I 1 I ick I I I I I I I IV I 1 I I I I LIV 1 1 I LQrj GL05 _ gQ /llri r I I s DINING I r - - - - �offt� - - - LOSET GLOSE 1 1 j� - DINING 11 I MA. - -- - -- - - - -- - I I n BATH - -- — -- - -- - -- - -- MA. __- - - -__— ,BATH ELEV. - - -- 4I O BA TH O , O — _ FO Y R FOYER Y S _— — _ A BATH AN —_ e BED 1 KITGH.• - -- C C C I I- I I C C In BED TO./L bar4h $TO. /LAU. I i I � r �1 .ATRIUM O 4 O w it, —_r 70. /LAII_ L h I 05ET STO. /LAU. I- n I I I IBED O brick AN J-JFOYER FOYER n SAO - y�.■r TH O - n BATH - -TT -- — - - - - - -- --- - - - - -- BATH 6 1 I I c I I AS I I I DINING I I I I 1 MA. J_— I I DINING I I I I i q LOSET GL - - - -eo— n E - - -- L - - - -- MA. _ _ _ soffit above _ _ T Gl-05E 8 iPOINT I 1 hO LIV I I I I Awl -- I LIV I I I MA. I I I I I I BED I I I I I I I I MA. j --- --�� -- -- I----- II BED O - - - - -1 Y C brick I - brick �W-71 ,'•b' ,'-6• 4' -Z• '•6' 6' -D- ' -9• 6'-0• 4'-6• '-6• 4'-6• 4-1• 6' -0• B' -T• !' -IO- IO' -0• 4' -7• ,' -T• ,• -y 71' -0• 14' -7• 14' -7• 91'-O• I,• -e• ue• -e- 1 SECOND FLOOR PLAN 1/16"=1'-0" .** 11MA 711 APPROVED PLAN UPPER FLOOR ve••r -0• 9 J Q 0 ly IL 4. Q V Burnet RWI1Y. Inc. not W. 700k PftnvW21N&IM RUMOtReftrIRL B q dm AW $54.99 Street F= 6121.QZM199 Monday, March 31, 1997 Hans Kuhlmann 5104 Hal(fax Avenue South Edina, MN 55424 Dear Hans: After reviewing your plans for the proposed development located between 51st and 52nd and Fiance Avenue, it is my opinion that the maximum pricing range would have to be between $300, 000 and $360, 000for this project to be viable. Having been involved in the marketing and sales of the Henley Condominiums on 50th and Halifax, and my involvement In other condominium /townhome developments, pricing is always the key factor in achieving reasonable sales absorption. To be more specific, of the 19 purchase agreements written at the Henley, none of the base price sales agreements exceeded $400,000, and the m41ority of the sales were between $275,000 and $360,000. I have attached a market breakdown of MLS resale's in the condominium style of building. These figures are certainly not all inclusive, and will not show all of the sales involving new construction. It is noteworthy what happens to demand in the different price ranges. In summary, product of this type priced over $400, 000 would not be recommended. Jk F. CCummings Fm, GRI AREA MARKET SURVEY 03/31/97 09:07 AM SEARCH CRITERIA: MC =A OR( ST= EXP ,SOLD,CANC,WITH,PEND,COMP,COMS AND OMD => "TODAY- 365 ") AR =300 -392 TYP =2 SEARCH_PR =150+ STY =A,G,H AR= 300 - MPLS- CALHOUN -ISLES 302 - MPLS - CENTRAL 310 - MPLS- UNIVERSITY 374 - PLYMOUTH 380 - BLOOMINGTON -WEST 381 - LAKE MINNETONKA 385 - EDINA 387 - MINNETONKA 392 - EDEN PRAIRIE 741 - DOWNTOWN STP /CAPITAL HEIGHTS 373 - GOLDEN VALLEY 379 - BLOOMINGTON -EAST 604 - MENDOTA /LILYDALE /MENDOTA HEIGHTS 309 - MPLS - SOUTHWEST ACTIVE LISTINGS List Price Range # Listings Avg Days on Mkt $120,000 - $159,999 7 58 $160,000 - $199,999 14 59 $200,000 - $249,999 11 78 $250,000 - $299,999 9 176 $300,000 - $349,999 6 132 $350,000 - $399,999 4 143 $400,000 - $449,999 3 59 $450,000 - $499,999 2 281 $500,000 - $599,999 3 150 $700,000 - $799,999 2 105 For the 6 The The The The The 1 properties: median price is $249,900. average price is $290,534. highest price is $795,000. lowest price is $155;000. average market time is 105 PENDING LISTINGS List Price Range # Listings Avg Days on Mkt $120,000 - $159,999 1 28 $160,000 - $199,999 11 61 $200,000 - $249,999 6 43 $250,000 - $299,999 6 23 $300,000 - $349,999 3 103 $500,000 - $599,999 1 14 $700,000 - $799,999 1 167 For the 29 properties: The median price is $210,800. The average price is $252,564. The highest price is $742,900. The lowest price is $159,500. The average-market time is 55 SOLD LISTINGS SOLD Price Range # Listings $120,000 - $159,999 7 $160,000 - $199,999 34 $200,000 - $249,999 20 $250,000 - $299,999 12 $300,000 - $349,999 9 $350,000 - $399,999 4 $400,000 - $449,999 3 $450,000 - $499,999 4 $600,000 - $699,999 1 For the 9. The The The The The 4 properties: median price is $210,300. average price is $243,776. highest price is $660,000.. lowest price is $150,000. average market time is 61 EXPIRED LISTINGS Avg Days on Mkt 74 67 56 63 49 99 43 19 2 List Price Range # Listings Avg Days on Mkt $120,000 - $159,999 3 140 $160,000 - $199,999 11 204 $200,000 - $249,999 11 144 $250,000 - $299,999 1 111 $300,000 - $349,999 4 181 $350,000 - $399,999 1 255 $400,000 - $449,999 1 127 $800,000 - $899,999 1 368 For the 3 The The The The The 3 properties: median price is $219,900. average price is $248,448. highest price is $829,000. lowest price is $156,900. average market time is 176 TO: FROM: VIA: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Mayor & City Council John Keprios, Director of Park & Recreation Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: April 21, 1997 ITEM DESCRIPTION: Park Bridges and Approaches #96 -5PK Company 1. Global. Specialty Contractors, Inc. 2. C.S. McCrossan Construction, Inc. 3. Progressive Contractors, Inc. 4. Meisinger Construction Co., Inc. 5. Jay Bros., Inc. 6. Lindahl & Carlson, Inc. 7. Sheryl's Construction, Inc. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Global Specialty Contractors, Inc. GENERAL INFORMATION: AGENDA ITEM Amount of Quote or Bid 1. $ 135,000.00 2. $ 150,000.00 3. $ 164,950.00 4. $ 204, 300.00 5. $ 220,672.00 6. $ 230,502.00 7. $ 288, 537.00 $ 113,000.00 (Partial Total Bid Award) This project is to replace three.park bridges and construct one new park bridge. Three park bridge replacements are funded by the Park Bond Referendum and partial general funds. The new bridge is funded by Golf Course funds and is contingent on the signing of an agreement between the City of Bloomington and the City of Edina. The Valley View Road and Tracy Avenue pedestrian bridge bid proposal is much higher than staff estimate, therefore, the bridge will be rejected. See attached memorandum. ature The Recommended Bid is X within budget Park & Recreation Department not within budget JeKn Wallin, Finance Director Kenneth Rosla d, City Man 96er Memo To: Mayor and City Council From: Francis Hoffman, City Engineer Date: April 18, 1997 Re: Park Bridges City of Edina Contract No. 96 -5PK The Beard Avenue bridge and approach will be 50% funded by general funds. The Valley View Road and Tracy Avenue pedestrian bridge replacement bid proposal is much higher than staff estimate. We recommend to reject this item and have Public Works reanalyze this bridge late this fall. As such, the seven bids minus the Valley View Road and Tracy Avenue bridge would be: Global Specialty Contractors, Inc. C.S. McCrossan Construction, Inc. Progressive Contractors, Inc. Meisinger Construction Co., Inc. Jay Bros., Inc. Lindahl &.Carlson, Inc. Sheryl's Construction, Inc. • Page 1 $113,000.00 $130,000.00 $145,850.00 $187,700.00 $176,972.00 $216,286.00 $266,350.00. o e �y REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: FROM: VIA: SUBJECT DATE: Mayor Smith and Members of the City Council John Keprios, Director of Parks and Recreation Kenneth Rosland, City Manager REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000 April 16, 1997 AGENDA ITEM Iv . B . ITEM DESCRIPTION: UTILITY TRACTOR - PARK MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT Company 1. Scharber & Sons, Inc. 2. Countryside Implements 3. Siemon Implement, Inc. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Scharber & Sons, Inc. $31,572.00 Amount of Quote or Bid 1.$31,572.00 2. $31,655.00 3. $32,741.00 Account #: 0650 -4901 GENERAL INFORMATION: This is for purchase of a four -wheel drive utility tractor with cab for the Edina Park Maintenance Department. This purchase includes the trade -in and replacement of a 1982 Model #445 Ford utility tractor with cab. This utility tractor is used for blowing and sweeping snow from ice rinks and pathways during the winter months. It is used for primarily mowing during the summer months, however, the power- take -off is also used to operate the power auger. This is part of the Equipment'Replacement Budget Plan. John prios, Director This Recommended bid is within budget Edina Park and Recreation Department not within budget fphn Wallin, Finance TO: FROM: VIA: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Mayor & City Council John Keprios; Director of Park & Recreation Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $5,000 DATE: April 21, 1997 ITEM DESCRIPTION: Main Pool Renovation Company 1. Hagen Decorators, Inc. 2. Northern Aire Swimming Pools 3. D.J. Graham Construction Co. 4. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Hagen Decorators, Inc. GENERAL INFORMATION: AGENDA ITEM Amount of Quote or Bid 1. $ 15,385.00 2. $ 23,041.00 3. $ 40, 500.00 4. 5. $ 15,385.00 This project is to sandblast and repaint existing main pool at the Edina Aquatic Center. This project is funded by the operating funds of the Edina Aquatic Center. Hagen Decorators, Inc. worked for the City in 1997 when they painted the water slide 'at this pool. re The Recommended Bid is within budget _ Park & Recreation Departm nt not within budget Jo Wallin, Finance Director z1J Kenneth R sla d, City Mana er `j o e. o REPORT /RECOMMENDATION HjA �y lase TO: Mayor & City Council From: David Velde City Sanitarian Date: April 21,1997 Subject: Request for Waiver from Food and Drug Administration Preemption Recommendation: Agenda Item # v. A. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Z To Council Action ❑ Motion ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to submit a written request to the Commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration asking for waiver from FDA Regulations which preempt Edina from enforcing an Ordinance more restrictive than the Federal Regulations addressing the sales of tobacco products from vending machines. Info /Background: FDA has adopted several regulations which restrict access to tobacco products nationwide. Among the regulations is a restriction of the use of vending machines for selling tobacco products. The FDA regulations permit vending machines in areas that otherwise prohibit a person 18 years of age and younger from entering. Edina City Ordinance No. 1325 prohibits the selling of tobacco products from vending machines entirely. The FDA regulations also include language which preempts local ordinances which are more restrictive than the federal regulations. Under this preemption, our local regulation on vending machine sales of tobacco products would become void. FDA has indicated that they did not intend to preempt local ordinances. Therefore, they will look favorably upon any requests for a waiver from preemption of specific ordinances which are more restrictive than federal regulations. The waiver request we prepared has been reviewed by the Edina Community Health Services Advisory Committee and was unanimously approved at their April 10, 1997 meeting. We will submit the formal application, upon Councils approval, along with other communities who are facing the same preemption as one group request. This group request is being coordinated through the League of Minnesota Cities. WHEREAS, The City of Edina, a municipal corporation in the State of Minnesota has been regulating youth access to tobacco products by developing and implementing various local ordinances to control tobacco products; and WHEREAS, the City of Edina adopted an ordinance in 1990 prohibiting the sale of tobacco products from vending machines under any condition; and WHEREAS, the City of Edina believes this restriction on access to tobacco products is more restrictive than Food and Drug Administration regulations regarding tobacco; and WHEREAS, the Food and Drug Administration regulations, as adopted on August 28, 1996, preempt local ordinances which may be more restrictive than the Federal regulations regarding tobacco; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Manager be authorized to submit a request for a waiver from the preemption of the City of Edina Code Section 1325 by the Food And Drug Administration regulations, thereby allowing the prohibition on the use of vending machines for dispensing tobacco products in Edina, Minnesota. MEMORANDUM To: Edina Community Health Services Advisory Committee Members From: David Velde Subject: FDA Preemption Waiver Date: April 9, 1997 The FDA Rules which took effect in February, 1997, preempted local ordinances which were more restrictive than the FDA Rules. Recognizing this error in preemption, FDA is willing to grant a waiver from the preemption. The Edina Ordinance regulating tobacco products is more restrictive than the FDA Rules with regard to the vending machine dispensing of products. FDA permits vending machine sales only where they can be monitored by an employee. Edina Ordinance prohibits the use of vending machine for dispensing tobacco products and will be preempted by the FDA Rules. We view this prohibition of vending sales of tobacco products as very important in reducing youth access to tobacco and therefore request a waiver from the FDA preemption. The application for waiver has been filled out and will be brought to the City Council on April 21, 1997, for approval. I am asking the Committee for their recommendation of approval for this waiver that will then be forwarded to the City Council. April 15, 1997 Dockets Management Branch Food and Drug Administration 12420 Parklawn Drive Room 1 -23 Rockville, MN 20857 Docket No. 96N -0249 Group 2 Dear Commissioner, Food and Drug Administration: The City of Edina, Minnesota, hereby applies for exemption from preemption of City Code Section 1325 regulating the sale, purchasing and use of tobacco products. This application is made pursuant to, and in accord with, Section 521(b) of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (21U.S.C. 360K(a)). A formal application and all relevant documents, including a complete and accurate copy of the city's Code provision regulating tobacco products is enclosed. Sincerely, Kenneth Rosland City Manager e o REPORT /RECOMMENDATION • �`�nhieoxt�K�� • lees To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # V. B. From: David Velde Consent 0 City Sanitarian Information Only ❑ Date: April 21,1997 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: Amendment of Tobacco ] To Council Section No. 1325 Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Hold a hearing to consider adopting an Ordinance which requires the storage and display of all tobacco products where they are inaccessible to the customer. Info /Background: In the Fall of 1996, Scott Johnson's Valley View Health Class approached the City about adopting an ordinance which would restrict access to tobacco products. Staff met with the Health Class and informed them of the current activities regarding regulation of tobacco products and our efforts to enforce current laws which prohibit selling tobacco products to minors. The Health Class reviewed our current Ordinance and wrote an amendment that would prohibit "Self- Service Merchandising" of tobacco products. The Edina Community Health Services Advisory Committee has reviewed the Ordinance amendment at their last two meetings and on April 10, 1997, voted to recommend passage of this Ordinance to the City Council. The Committee also recommended that the Council hold a hearing and notify all licensed retailers of the hearing to obtain their input on this Ordinance. The Health Class has been following the development of this Ordinance and some members may be present for the discussions. Edina Ordinance No. 1997 - 4 An Ordinance Amending Section 1325 of the City Code to Prohibit Certain Displays and Sales of Tobacco Products THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Subsection 1325.05 of Section 1325 of the.City Code is amended by adding a new Subd. 3 as follows: "Subd. 3 Self- Service Merchandising. No person shall sell any tobacco by any means whereby the customer may have access to such items without having to request assistance from an employee of the licensed premises. All tobacco shall be stored or displayed behind a sales counter or in other rooms or display areas which are not freely accessible to customers. Provided, however, the requirements of this Subd. 3 shall not apply to establishments which prohibit persons under 18 years of age from entering the establishment unless accompanied by a parent or legal guardian and a notice advising of the prohibition is conspicuously displayed at all entrances to the establishment." Section 2. This ordinance is in full force and effect upon passage and publication. Me o To: City- Council - - From: Glenn Smith, Mayor Date: April 18, 1997 Re: Appointment to Recycling & Solid Waste Commission am recommending Judith ,R. Smith_ for appointment to the Recycling' & Solid Waste Commission. Judith will be completing term ending February 1, 1998 of Ardythe Buerosse. (k 9(Le 9 �• f��ReO���/ CITY OF EDINA • 4801 W. 50th Street • Edina, MN 55424 APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO ADVISORY BOARDS /COMMISSIONS NAME T U di i +�, i't\ ADDRESS 5 `1 1 3 ki (l a✓ n L n ZIP CODE 3 HOME PHONE 9 " S S'y �f WORK PHONE EDINA RESIDENT (number of years) �Ws up EMPLOYMENT (firm and occupation /profession) 1 =�c ��;%.� 6 cam/ 6-Ss � CIVIC, PROFESSIONAL, COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES t--W 0 - r a A 0 PREVIOUS PUBLIC EXPERIENCE (Elective or Appointive) L Co- . EDUCATION �_-- + -S Briefly list aspects of your experience which you believe qualify you for this advisory board /commission and why you are interested in serving: L4c (For additional space, use reverse side of application) APPOINTMENT PREFERENCE: PLANNING COMMISSION HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD PARK BOARD HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CONSTRUCTION BOARD OF APPEALS ART CENTER COMMITTEE COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICE S_ RECYCLING & SOLID WASTE ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMISSION DATE SIGNAL (Return Agenda Item No. V.C. CITY OP EDINA Memo - Ta City- Council - - From: Glenn Smith, Mayor Date: April 21, 1997 Re: Appointment to Recycling & Solid Waste Commission. Friday afternoon after the packet was distributed Thomas Carrico faxed his resignation into City Hall. Tom served-on the Recycling.and Solid Waste Commission. It is my intention to recommend Pat Tucker for appointment to the remainder of Tom's term. Tom's term ends February 9 ,1998. This appointment will be in addition to the appointment of Judith Smith. • Page 1 uaituitoi 14:13 t'-A.1 dig 928 9693 EDINA CC 04/10/97 11:40 F..AZ 937 T6i5 c.11z ur a„i,•a (600: CITY OF EDINA • 4801 W. 50th Street - Edina, MN 55424 APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO ADVISORY BOARDS /COMMISSIONS ADDRESS y 7 c S 4 ZIP CODE HOME PHON —WORK PHONE c EDINA RESIDENT (number of years) EMPLOYMENT (firm and occupation /profession) A{Ii x•• 6,1 bez- oc h, CIVIC, PROFESSIONAL, COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES r,,d /_ e,.� -� PREVIOUS PUBLIC EXPERIENCE (Elective or Appointive) %i 'k - EDUCATION 'L Briefly list aspects of your experience which you believe qualify you for this advisory board/ commission and why you are interested in serving: (For additional space, use reverse side of applicaVOn) APPOINTMENT PREFERENCE: PLANNING COMMISSION HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD PARK BOARD HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CONSTRUCTION BOARD OF APPEALS ART CENTER COMMITTEE COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICE RECYCLING & SOLID WASTE ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMISSION DATE '1 '�� SIGNATURE (Return completed form to City Clerks office) :! rdI 16:44 fAX 612 Z29 9661 Mr. Glenn Smith Mayor City of Fdina 4801 West 50 °i Street Edina. MN 55424 Dear Mayor Smith: VIDEO UPDATE, INC. [a 001 It is with deep regret that I must resign my position on the Edina Recycling and Solid Waste Commission. Due to my increased responsibilities in my career, I Stn unable to attend the regular commission meetings and events associated with serving on the commission. Thank you for the opportunity to be associated with the commission and I look forward to possibly serving in the future. Sincerely. Thomas H. Carrico A. o e REPORT /RECOMMENDATION H co gig �� �y lass TO: Mayor & City Council From: Francis Hoffman City Engineer Date: April 21, 1997 Subject: Approval of Wooddale Water Treatment Plant Upgrade Project Recommendation: Agenda Item # V.E. Consent Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA D To Council Action ® Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Authorize rehabilitation upgrade of existing Wooddale Water Treatment Plant. Info /Background: The Wooddale Water Treatment Plant located in Utley Park was initially completed in 1959. Some minor revisions have been made over the years. Staff has completed an evaluation of the plant and concludes that a major overhaul is warranted. Staff evaluated options which .included providing new filter systems to combinations of overhauling major components of the system. The range of costs on the options were $235,000 to $370,000. The option selected by staff would include the following items: • Remove existing media, support gravel and underdrains for each filter • Sandblast and paint filter exteriors • Furnish and install new header /lateral underdrain • Replace 16" of support gravel and 24" of silica sand Report/Recommendation Agenda Item V.E. Page Two • Furnish and install new airwash piping and blower, new air operated valves and Backwash control panel • Electrical rehabilitation • Mechanical rehabilitation This project would be the option with the $235,000.00 estimate. This project would be let in the late fall of 1997 when the City has the least need for the plant. The actual expenditure of funds would occur during 1998. Staff would recommend that the project be authorized and the funds for this project would be from the water /sanitary sewer utility account. o e �, REPORT /RECOMMENDATION c �y less ., To: Mayor & City Council From: Francis Hoffman ')/i City Engineer Date: April 21, 1997 Agenda Item # V.F. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: Request for Flood ® To Council Reduction Funds for ° Action 0 Motion 5805 Concord Avenue ❑ Resolution ° ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Authorize fund expenditure to homeowner and contractor for flood reduction program subject to a hold harmless clause from the homeowner. Info /Background: In 1989, the City of Edina established a stormwater utility. Attached is the general letter that went to every property owner in 1988 prior to the Council establishing the utility. In 1993, the Edina City Council expanded the program to provide a flood reduction program for individual property. Attached is the covenant to hold the City harmless from future claims and elements of the program. The homeowner at 5805 Concord is aware of the program and desires to participate in the program. The past history on the property indicates a flooding history involving a minimum of four times since the mid- 1960's. The homeowner wishes to add window -well protection that would result in the top of the protection element being at an elevation of one foot higher than the predicted 100 year event. Please note the attached request and contractor quote. Staff review by Barr Engineering and City staff have been conducted. On this particular project, staff would recommend that this grant be approved for $2570.00 subject to the covenant be executed for the property at 5805 Concord. CITY OF "EDINA 4801 WEST 50TH STREET. EDINA. MINNESOTA 55424 612- 927 -8861 Dear Edina Resident/Property Owner: Edina proposes to use a new technique to pay for costs of maintaining and protecting the infrastructure of our stormwater runoff system — a Stonn Drainage Utility. This Storm Drainage Utility would be a service similar to the water and sanitary sewer utilities. Fees would be based on the amount of water discharged into the storm sewer system. For example, a parking lot creates more runoff than a grass area of the same size, so commercial, industrial and multiple dwelling properties would accrue higher rates than residential properties. The expected quarterly fees for various types of properties are shown below: Single Family Homes and Duplexes ................. $ 5.00 /Lot Parks, Cemeteries and Golf Courses .................$3.36 /Acre Schools .... ............................... $15.90 /Acre Churches, Institutional and Multiple Family Dwellings ..... $40.35 /Acre Commercial and Industrial ...................... $67.25 /Acre The City of Edina is aging. Our stormwater system, originally built by the assessment process, now needs updated maintenance and capital improvements. The major rain storm of July, 1987, demonstrated that opportunities also exist to route stormwater from private to public properties providing better overall performance of the stormwater system. All three of these concerns will be directly addressed through a Storm Drainage Utility fund. The results will be as follows: • Increased protection for people and property • Reduced insurance risks • Improved property values community-wide If the City Council adopts the Storm Drainage Utility, the City will be able to accomplish a number of important goals related to Edina's storm water handling system. Among these goals are to: • Maintain existing storm water facilities so they will operate properly for a longer period of time • Provide and improve wetlands to clean storm water and retard flows • Replace existing storm facilities which could become unusable over the years due to natural deterioration The Edina City Council plans to hold a public hearing on the Storm Drainage Utility on Monday, August 15, 1988, at 7:00 P.M. at City Hall. You are invited to attend. Also, further information can be obtained by calling the En- gineering Division at 927 -8861. SAMPLE COVENANT This covenant is executed this day of , 1994, by (hereinafter "The Owners "), on behalf of themselves, their heirs, successors and assigns. RECITALS The Owners are the fee owners of certain property situated in the City of Edina, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, which is legally described as follows: Said property shall hereinafter be called the "Premises ". The City of Edina has established a Flood Reduction Program which is publicly funded and intended to provide financial assistance to eligible homeowners in undertaking preventative measures to reduce the risk of flood - related damage to their homes (hereinafter the "Program "). The premises meets the eligibility requirements of the Program. The Owners have agreed to hire a contractor to complete the work prescribed under the Program. The City agrees to use Program money to pay for the reasonable value of the work prescribed by the Program as determined by the City. The City does not guarantee that the flood reduction measures for which Program money is paid are adequate or will prevent future flood - related damage to the premises. NOW, THEREFOR, the Owners agree as follows: (1) This Covenant shall run with the land and be binding on Owners, their heir, successors, and assigns; (2) Owners, their heirs, successors and assigns agree to defend, hold harmless and indemnify the City of Edina for and against any claims for death, personal injury, or damage to or taking of real and personal property, from flood - related damages to the premises caused, in whole or in part, by inadequacy of the flood reduction measures undertaken through the Program. OWNERS ACKNOWLEDGEMENT STATE OF MINNESOTA) )SS COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) The foregoing was acknowledged before me this , 1994, by day of and the owners and covenantors hereunder. Notary Public B) Grant Program for Individual Sites • Eligibility - Individuals versus Associations/ Corporations. Engineering Recommendation - Grant applies to property, not ownership. • Cost Sharing - Range of cost split and /or special assessment. Engineering Recommendation - If structure flooded, range would be from 50 to 100% - grant funded. This would depend upon external influences on site. Each would be site specific. • Site Improvements - Modifications to prevent water entry versus re- landscaping. Engineering Recommendation - Flood reduction efforts as approved by City Engineer and may - include, but not limited to, any. of the following: a. Filling, grading and sodding /seeding around point of water entry. b. Adding or modifying window cells. c. Eliminating basement windows and /or substituting glass blocks. d. Replacing large basement windows or doors with smaller windows. e. Building concrete or treated wood block wall dikes /planters. f. Other improvements such as driveway raising at street to prevent water entry would be considered general improvement. e Regional Flood Reduction Program - Currently not available at City level. Engineering Recommendation - Continue to work, with Watershed Districts to develop Flood Reduction Programs. April 17, 1997 To: Fran Hoffman Re: Concrete Window -wells at 5805 Concord Ave. So. Dear Fran, I'm enclosing a copy of my contract with the Tom Peterson Construction Company for $2570. They plan to begin work on Monday, April 21, and finish by Friday the 25th. I realize that this is the same day as the City Council meeting, but the only other alternative was to begin in late May, and I did not want to wait that long. I spoke with Tom about using iron bars to connect and stabilize the bottom and sides of the structures; he had already planned to do that, and said it is standard. He had also talked to Chris Arlandson, the engineer who did the plans, about whether drains are needed. Tom plans to use passive, back - checked drains in each of the window- wells. I have made a down payment of $860, in addition to the $550 for the engineering work that was done last summer and fall. The balance of $1710 will be due on completion. Hopefully the city can reimburse me shortly after that, for whatever portion they are willing to subsidize. Thanks for all you've done to help to get this project going! I'll plan to be at the Council meeting on Monday, see you then. Sincerely, Linda Tillou • TOM PETERSON CONST. CO. 16170 Westgate Ln. Eden Prairie, MN 55344 (612) 835 -9103 MN License 7726 PROPOSAL rr=vu Cl �uun11uucu U. Name U NO& TU-011 Secs comom IV. S. c. FD1ND► MN. 925-1531 4- 1(o-97 OF 1 1 Work To Be Performed At: ^oar SBC)s coNwW aV. S/ ED1Nk Mu. '719� ._ _ _ _ �F rrnGmr. 'Ple ^ereb., -_ -se :_ .. -e c:o '9'S arC ce" _ . " _ sor- --'e5 =9" -ne c. ;er.icr or TueEE GONCEM 1 IMMOW BrEUC LIe S C ONE ® lo#-o 4 -rw ® -s o) W cE Wt1'u MwugGs -t 1 4* z, BY pecjFzr FW=1KEMkG MNAGEMEmr INC. INCLUD1N%s I. Exmv loo/ PW-XFIL.I WO PEMOVdL OF EXCESS E&JZTN • 2. MME S gmm S 70 WhIls. �4. SL DAD 00MCeErE S'.Rms To BE Fi ms um S. C NPLZT , CLEA4 up OF OLIN, '*ML$ DXcWDES 7LIU EEPNE. ilmb Ty_ 'IVx w4cm.. SF.V Y /3 Wr�2., B&I &CIE UPI mMPr- L�71d�1. Tc o1�e LDS-�Wi�� REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council % From: Francis HoffmanL�� /�.. City Engineer Date: April 21, 1997 Subject: No Parking Resolutions for Mill and Overlay Improvements A -181 and A -182 Recommendation: Agenda Item # V.G. Consent 9. W. 70`h Street - Metro to Amundson Information Only ❑ No Parking East Side Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA No Parking Either Side ® To Council Action ❑ Motion ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Pass No Parking Resolutions for mill and overlay jobs as appropriate. Info /Background: LOCATION RESOLUTION W. 701h Street - Xerxes to France No Parking Either Side W. 70`h Street - Metro to Amundson No Parking South Side Cahill Road - W. 70'h to W. 78`h No Parking East Side Gleason Road - Valley View to Dewey Hill No Parking West Side W. 761 Street 280' West of Xerxes No Parking Either Side These are the existing parking restrictions. Actual resolutions are needed by state aid as part of their approval package for the mill and overlay program. o e ,, REPORT /RECOMMENDATION NCO Qq �y ED lase To: Mayor & City Council From: Francis Hoffman'A,'/.J City Engineer Date: April 21, 1997 Agenda Item # V.H. Consent 0 Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: Cooperative Construction © To Council Agreement with MnDOT Action ❑ Motion to Revise Existing Traffic ® Signals at W. 70th & T.H. 100 Resolution and All Emergency Vehicle ❑ Ordinance Pre - emption to the Signals ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Authorize Cooperative Project and authorize Mayor and Manager to sign Cooperative Agreement to upgrade existing signals at W. 70`h Street and Highway 100. Info /Background: The City of Edina and Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) have been cooperatively working to upgrade the W. 701 and Highway 100 interchange area. This project would be to upgrade the existing signal systems, and add appropriate emergency vehicle pre - emption and interconnect systems. These costs are split 50 -50 based on MnDOT policy. Our City estimated cost would be $37,530.00 which would be eligible for state aid reimbursement. As such, staff would recommend entering into the Cooperative Agreement with MnDOT. This is one of several projects involving MnDOT that the staff is pursuing to either enhance safety or capacity upgrades. MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL AND HIGHWAY LIGHTING AGREEMENT NO. 75958 BETWEEN THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY OF EDINA TO Revise the existing Traffic Control Signals with Street Lights, Emergency Vehicle Pre- emption, Interconnect and Signing; and Provide Maintenance and Electrical Energy for the existing Highway Lighting System on Trunk Highway No. 100 East and West Ramps at West 70th Street in Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota. S.P. 2733 -79 S.A.P. 120 - 145 -21 Prepared by Traffic Engineering ESTIMATED AMOUNT RECEIVABLE City of Edina $37,530.00 AMOUNT ENCUMBERED None Otherwise Covered THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into by and between the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation, hereinafter referred to as the "State ", and the City of Edina, hereinafter referred to as the "City ", WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes Section 161.20 (1994) authorizes the Commissioner of Transportation to make arrangements with and cooperate with any governmental authority for the purposes of constructing, maintaining and improving the Trunk Highway system; and WHEREAS, the State has determined that there is justification and it is in the public's best interest to revise the existing traffic control signals with street lights, emergency vehicle pre - emption, interconnect and signing on Trunk Highway No. 100 East and West Ramps at West 70th Street; and was considered mutually desirable to install the existing highway lighting system on Trunk Highway No. 100 East and West Ramps at West 70th Street; and WHEREAS, the City requests and the State agrees to the installation of Emergency Vehicle Pre - emption Systems, hereinafter referred to as the "EVP Systems ", as a part of the revised traffic control signal installations on Trunk Highway No. 100 East and West Ramps at West 70th Street, and in accordance with the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth; and 75958 -1- WHEREAS, it is considered in the public's best interest for the State to provide one (1) master controller and two (2) new cabinets and control equipment to operate the revised traffic control signals; and WHEREAS, the City and State will participate in the cost, maintenance and operation of the revised traffic control signals with street lights, EVP Systems, interconnect and signing; and the maintenance and electrical energy for the existing highway lighting system as hereinafter set forth; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. The State shall prepare the necessary plan, specifications and proposal which shall constitute "Preliminary Engineering ". The State shall also perform the construction inspection required to complete the items of work hereinafter set forth, which shall constitute "Engineering and Inspection" and shall be so referred to hereinafter. 2. The contract cost of the work, or if the work is not contracted, the cost of all labor, materials, and equipment rental required to complete the work, except the cost of providing the power supply to the service pole or pad, shall constitute the actual "Construction Cost" and shall be so referred to hereinafter. 3. The State with its own forces and equipment or by contract shall perform the traffic control signal work provided 75958 -2- for under State Project No. 2733 -79 and State Aid Project No. 120- 145 -21 with the Construction Costs shared as follows: a. Trunk Highway No. 100 West Ramps at West 70th Street. System "C". Revise the existing traffic control signal with street lights, EVP System, interconnect and signing. Estimated Construction Cost is $38,500.00 which includes State furnished materials. State's share is 50 percent. City's share is 50 percent. b. Trunk Highway No. 100 East Ramps at West 70th Street. System "D ". Revise the existing traffic control signal with street lights, EVP System, interconnect and signing. Estimated Construction Cost is $31,000.00 which includes State furnished materials. State's share is 50 percent. City's share is 4. Upon writing by the Stat, amount equal to its total portion shall a. 50 percent. execution of this agreement and a request in the City shall advance to the State an portion of the project costs. The City's consist of the sum of the following: The City's share (as specified in Paragraph 3) based on the actual bid prices 75958 -3- and the estimated State furnished materials costs. b. Eight (8) percent of its share [Item (a) above] for the cost of Engineering and Inspection. 5. Upon completion and final acceptance of the project, the City's final share shall consist of the sum of the following: a. The City's share (as specified in Paragraph 3) based on the final payment to the Contractor and the actual State furnished materials costs. b. Eight (8) percent of its final share [Item (a) above] for the cost of Engineering and Inspection. The amount of the funds advanced by the City in excess of the City's final share will be returned to the City without interest and the City agrees to pay to the State that amount of its final share which is in excess of the amount of the funds advanced by the City. 6. At the existing highway lighting system provided for herein, it shall be the City's responsibility, at its cost and expense to maintain and keep in repair said existing highway lighting system and provide the necessary electrical energy for the operation of the existing highway lighting system. 75958 -4- 7. The City shall perpetuate an adequate electrical power supply to the service pads or poles, and upon completion of said revised traffic control signals with street lights installations shall continue to provide necessary electrical power for their operation at the cost and expense of the City. 8. Upon completion of the work contemplated in Paragraph 3 hereof, it shall be the City's responsibility, at its cost and expense, to: (1) maintain the luminaires and all its components, including replacement of the luminaire if necessary; (2) relamp the revised traffic control signals with street lights, except for the Red LED signal indications which shall be relamped by the State for the 5 year warranty period and by the City thereafter; and (3) clean and paint the revised traffic control signals, cabinets and luminaire mast arm extensions. It shall be the State's responsibility, at its cost and expense, to maintain the signing and to perform all other traffic control signal and street light maintenance. 9. The EVP Systems provided for in Paragraph 3 hereof shall be installed, operated, maintained, or removed in accordance with the following conditions and requirements: a) All maintenance of the EVP Systems shall be done by State forces. b) Emitter units may be installed and used only on vehicles responding to an emergency as defined in Minnesota Statutes Chapter 169.01, 75958 -5- Subdivision 5 and 169.03. The City will provide the State's Assistant Division Engineer or.his duly appointed representative a list of all such vehicles with emitter units. c) Malfunction of the EVP Systems shall be reported to the State immediately. d) In the event said EVP Systems or components are, in the opinion of the State, being misused or the conditions set forth in Paragraph b above are violated, and such misuse or violation continues after receipt by the City of written notice thereof from the State, the State shall remove the EVP Systems. Upon removal of the EVP Systems pursuant to this Paragraph, the field wiring, cabinet wiring, detector receivers, infrared detector heads and indicator lamps and all other components shall become the property of the State. e) All timing of said EVP Systems shall be determined by the State through its Commissioner of Transportation. 10. Any and all persons engaged in the aforesaid work to be performed by the State shall not be considered employees of 75958 -6- the City and any and all claims that may or might arise under the Worker's Compensation Act of this State on behalf of said employees while so engaged, and any and all claims made by any third party as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of said employees while so engaged on any of the work contemplated herein shall not be the obligation and responsibility of the City. The State shall not be responsible under the Worker's Compensation Act for any employees of the City. 11. Timing of the revised traffic control signals provided for herein shall be determined by the State, through its Commissioner of Transportation, and no changes shall be made therein except with the approval of the State. 12. Upon execution and approval by the City and the State and completion of the construction work provided for herein, this agreement shall supersede and terminate Agreement No. 58438 dated April 5, 1977, between the parties. 75958 -7- APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney CITY OF EDINA Y IV- Mayor (City Seal) By zis 4e�zv,, I City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Assistant Division Engineer By Assistant Commissioner Dated APPROVED AS TO FORM AND EXECUTION: DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION Assistant Attorney General State of Minnesota 75958 -8- By Dated DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE By Dated M RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Edina, enter into an agreement with the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation for the following purposes, to wit: To revise the existing traffic control signals with street lights, emergency vehicle pre - emption, interconnect and signing; and provide maintenance and electrical energy for the existing highway lighting system on Trunk Highway No. 100 East and West Ramps at West 70th Street in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth and contained in Agreement No. 75958, a copy of which was before the Council. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the proper City officers be and hereby are authorized to execute such agreement, and thereby assume for and on behalf of the City all of the contractual obligations contained therein. CERTIFICATION State of Minnesota County of Hennepin City of Edina I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of a resolution presented to and adopted by the Council of the City of Edina at dqly authorized meeting thereof held on the � day of 1997, as shown by the minutes of said meeting in my possession. (Seal) City Clerk AGENDA ITEM: VII.B. April 15, 1997 Commissioner Mary Tambornino Hennepin County Commissioner, District 6 Board of Hennepin County Commissioner. A -2400 Government Center Minneapolis, MN 55487 -0240 RE: COMMUNITY RESPONSE TO TURNING POINTS PROPOSED PURCHASE AND OPERATION OF A GROUP HOME FACILITY FOR GIRLS AGE 11 -17, COMING FROM THE HENNEPIN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL SYSTEM. Dear Commissioner Tambomino, We hope you received our neighborhood's message at the special community meeting held on April 8, 1997: WE DO NOT WANT A GROUP HOME OF THIS NATURE IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD For ten years we have been victims of this group home, owned and operated by Mr. James Just, and Stonebridge. There have been numerous thefts, cars rummaged through, door bells ringing in the middle of the night, girls curdling screams,'boys and girls stating huge fires on their front steps, harassment toward our children while walking home from school, constant profanity, loud music with insulting words, harassment towards our animals, children cutting through our yards, fights between the group home's children and the frequent sight of police taking children out handcuffed at all hours of the night and day. Police report records should be evidence enough of our nightmare (one - hundred eighteen 911 calls in 18 months, two hundred in the past five years). Hennepin County's efforts to reconcile that operation were long overdue and your proposal to fund yet another operation of the same nature is ludicrous. We were given a run- around when we called for help from our County and State Departments. We answered many questions to describe the events which were occurring at Stonebridge and received a letter from the State Department of Human Services referring this issue to the Chemical Dependency Unit. We made numerous calls to various departments to address our concerns and nobody was willing to listen. We spoke to several individuals in each department and over time understood that each department was busy pointing fingers at each other. In addition, we tried to meet with Stonebridge several times, but they never showed up, or simply failed to respond. After the home was closed, a tour of the premises showed lack of supervision from Stonebridge, Hennepin County and the State of MN. The rooms were filthy, windows broken, doors broken, bathrooms unsanitary to wash in, gang graffiti on the beds, garbage accumulation on the outside of the house, leaking water heaters and so on. We just can't believe that if regular inspections were performed by the State or Hennepin County, these departments would continue to let that home function. We have collected some of the public records describing the warnings from the State and County to Stonebridge, however, the time permitted .for action seemed too lenient for the conditions stated above. These conditions did n i= happen over night. Our neighborhood does not have confidence that neither you, the County, or the State will step in and protect us and our children, nor that these programs are of much benefit to the population where it is located. Page 2 Commissioner Tambomino On March 29, 1997 we received your letter asking for a special community meeting to be held on April 8. It appears your letter was only sent to West 49th Street, Townes Road, West 48th Street and the 4800 block of France Avenue. Our community encompasses more than the few blocks you have put on notice. Our community also includes a school system that will be affected. We are questioning whether the Edina School Board has been put on notice and whether they know you support integrating these kids with criminal backgrounds; quite possibly creating yet anther tax burden in social services. - Commissioner Tambomino, as residents and taxpayers, we respectfully deserve answers to all of our questions. You have not yet specifically outlined the program the proposed new owners, Turning Point, will implement. e.g. how long will each child be institutionalized before they "graduate" from the program? What can Turning Point offer for success rates? Are there simular programs in existence and what is their success rate? Is Turning Point truly turning the lives of these young people around or are the owners of these group homes simply "warehousing" these children? What specific steps would you take to ensure that both the Group Home's clients and it's surrounding community will be cared for? We also would like to know how much the County is offering to pay the new owner per child, per day and for how long that stipend may be available to each child: a question you failed to answer at our meeting. In summarization Commissioner Tambomino, today and in the future, we are holding you accountable for community safety, tax payer monies, and to address and regulate this proposed program's venue. We would very much appreciate further communication on this matter and hope that you can understand our concerns. PIS 4ft -� -- —� Gail Dean, resident David Stein, resident cc: Edina Mayor Glen Smith cc: Governor Arne Carlson cc: State Representative Ron Erhardt cc: State Senator Roy Terwilliger cc: Star Tribune Newspaper cc: Sun Current Newspaper att: petition #1 - not every household polled att: memo from commissioner to community Z. .'i April 1, 1997 To whom it concerns: We, the undersigned, agree that a group home in White Oaks on West 49th Street, would not benefit this community and in retrospect view it as a detriment, and do not want it here. NAME "OTL L!"I /U MEMO- / ') Gt tc ADDRESS F4.6(C-2, A-r- S 4-76)' P Z. 362-!�- LJ, Z/9s-fi. S(77, 3 _ - - April 1, 1997 To whom it concerns: We, the undersigned, agree that a group home in White Oaks on West 49th Street, would not benefit this community and in retrospect view it as a detriment, and do not want it here. NAME ADDRESS w \,j ` �-` _ Z6 3 i`5 i 3� �I-°l April 1, 1997 To whom it concerns: We, the undersigned, agree that a group home in White Oaks on West 49th Street, would not benefit this community and in retrospect view it as a detriment, and do not want it here. NAME MI 1 _ ADDRESS �g3S c✓ ���- S; , MARY TA,,%BORNINO PHONE COMMISSIONER 348 -7886 FAX 348 -8701• �w BOARD OF HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMISSIONERS A-2400 GOVERNMENT CENTER MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55487 -0240 March 27, 1997 Dear Community Member, I would like to invite you to a special community meeting to address a recent change in your neighborhood. As you may or may not know, the cuntract between Hennepin County and Stonebridge Corporation has been terminated. Turning Point, Inc., a 21 -year- old health and social services agency has negotiated to purchase the Stonebridge facility on 3930 West 49" Street in Edina and provide its past housing and programming services in a group home setting. Turning Point administrators, me, and members of the Children and Family Services Department of Hennepin County believe that new group homes in this area would be an asset to the community. We are optimistic about the possibilities of Turning Point and we anticipate significant improvements under the new management. On Tuesday, April 8, 1997 we hope you will join us at the Lutheran Church of the Good Shepherd on 48 " Street & France Avenue South at 7:00 p.m., so we can discuss this site, and any concerns that you have. Please address all questions about this meeting to my office at 348 -7886. Sincerely, / W� SE 11=1 � Mary Tambornino Hennepin County Commissioner, District 6 DrMRNET: Mary .Tamborninoa co. henne pin. mn.us b ' �j State of Minnesota Department of Human Services Human Services Building 444 Lafayette Road St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 October 30, 1995 Gail Dean 3925 West 49th Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Welcome Home residents Welcome Home, License No. 804466 Dear Ms. Dean: On October 27, 1995, the Division of Licensing received your report of alleged maltreatment. The report has been assigned. The report was not assigned for investigation under the Reporting of Maltreatment of Vulnerable Adults Act. There will be no further disposition on this report. XX The report has been referred for review to the following: Mental Health/ Chemical Dependency Unit The Department appreciates your concern regarding services provided to vulnerable adults. SincereelY, Michelle Betsinger, Maltreatment Int ke Division of Licensing ANEQUAL OPPORTUNITYFMPLOYF.R ro -wiMor u. +a June 18, 1996 Mayor Fred Richards Edina City Hall 4801 W 50tn Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Richards: Thank you for listening to us last night regarding the Welcome Home or Stonebridge facility. In all honesty, I was discouraged that if we explained the situation for the umpteenth time that no one would care. As I stood before the counsel members and yourself with a script in hand, my discouragement, rage and frustration came about and my emotions took hold. I do apologize for this but during the last year it has been nothing but a circus trying to contact someone with authority to help us. This situation is beyond control and we feel mediation is not going to make us happy. We have become victims in our own area. There are so many stories we could tell of the abuse that transpires from this home, that any respectable person would be astounded. Through my own investigation I have concluded that to revoke a license we must prove that the owner is not living up to the standards or so called requirements set forth from the State licensing division. We find it appalling with the grounds of unsupervised children, curdling screams from girls, offensive language, music and assault amongst themselves and constant disturbance, is not grounds for revocation of Stonebridge's license. In our eyes the owner is living in Minnestrista, a very nice suburb, making big money by use of his business within the home and collecting rent or a fee for. each resident, all at the expense of us. The State of Minnesota's position is to keep poiting the finger within their - departments and maybe, just maybe this issue will not surface. We strongly oppose that this operation is allowed to function even if a new organization managed the facility. We also feel that with the support and help of our Mayor and City Council, that this issue will be taken serious and resolution will occur quickly. This issue must not be ignored by the State, City or Private entities any longer. At this moment, I want to express the deep gratification we experienced last night when the Council Members and yourself stress concern and swift action to cease this disruption. Tears came to my eyes of relief and hope. Nobody has any'idea what it is like to sit at work every day and wait for their child to call and say, " I am home and am okay", while wondering if the kids across the street are ready and waiting to harass once again. How far will it go before an innocent child is harmed due to the lack of responsibility from this establishment. Very Truly Yours, Gail Dean Richard & Mary Cochrane 3925 Nest 49th Street 3922 West 49th Street cc:. City Council Members Peggy Kelly Dennis Maetzold Jane Paulus Glenn Smith Monday NOVEMBER 18, 1996 1Vletro /S�a INDEX _ 33 Columnists Page B2 BFaces & Places Page B5 SECTION '• Obituaries Page B4 Weather Page B6 StarTriburte W Inside omes succum to troubled history Winter storm buses Red River Unit QUP homes '* Grow eta �' s closing homes closing but made history Stonebridge's grow twmes John Starks found dis - _ ; for troubled teens in Edha. Brook" Center, Btoomngton FfNWFPIN CO. 94 and Lon Lake have closed Long Lake loo ' aher Hervr�ilCounty discontinued :�: 490 ,.., _:, :ct - - , - its contract with with the group for several months, the county paid r' the homes bmause of troubled finances and C �: =';.r ` o .:. allegations of wrongdoing co F694 CJ1Rt/Fit jsxr ca l n L7. L394 detall aM� SCOTT CO. r-- In Election Day, Satveer Chaudhary ecame the first Asian - American to .In a seat In the Legislature. seat . r1V;fft1$1^ IF- F Edina' r ; 1: : i _ay' • ®1 tu 101:- �esott+R•�- 2mks _ �o Star Trbule map Closure of 4_ teen group residences leaves legacy of fiscal, staffing woes By Mark Brunswick Star Tribune Staff Writer About 35 troubled teenagers have been moved out of four suburban group homes owned by a company called Stonebridge. The homes leave a legacy of police investigations that included accusations of assault and allegations that a staff member was having sex with a teenage client. There were also financial problems that at times meant food shortages at some of the homes. located in Edina, Brooklyn Center, Bloomington and Long Lake. James lust, the owner of the group homes, re- peatedly asked Hennepin County this year to give him more money for the homes — despite being on probation for chronic failure to meet basic filing requirements and acknowledging problems with a ey As man,, as 14 inches of snow and strong hinds dis- abled the extreme north - western pan of the state on Sundae. Turn to 86. The col una� ' t maintenance and staff shortages. ` 11 S .............. ............................... Reluctantly, the county agreed. And then it began trying to get lust out of the group -home business. He Wanted a job, The story of Stonebridge is one of contradiction: but made history The county increased funding for a business that by John Starks found dis - many accounts did not perform satisfactorily foryears. In a similar case this year, the county pulled the crimination in an unlikely place, but rooted it out. See, plug on its contract with the Suburban Alliance, a human senlices council that coordinated nonprofit DOUG GROW on B2. i groups who helped the needy. T The alliance encountered a severe cash -flow prob- : : .............. .............................:: .. •. lent when it moved to a new location. After working '''- with the group for several months, the county paid Mail update creditors and moved to dissolve the organization. The Stonebridge case represented the dilemma. The Postal Service is al- same ready gearing up for the hol= - Turn to STONEBRIDGE on 83 INSIGHT: Keeping kids in the classroom Although the Minneapolis n-uancy' Center has seen less use than e�-pected, school district officials have had a tough time improving overall attendance. iday mailing frenzy. If you're going to be pan of it, here are recommended mailing.:_ deadlines for parcels head-,'. ing outside the United – States: > _ > Africa, the Caribbean, Central and South America,' Australia and New Zealand: Dec. 2. > Europe, the Far East ' Southeast Asia and the A4id .t die East Dec. 9. – �r > Canada: Dec. 13. , -- For holiday cards and let;, <_ lets heading outside the United States: – > Africa. the Caribbean.'• Central and South America: ." Dec. 2. _ > Europe, the Far East, - Southeast Asia, the Middle East, Australia and New Zealand: Dec. 9. > Canada: Dec. 13. 1+10NDAY. NOVEMBER IB " 1996 Metro /State *,)TAR TRIBUNE • PAGE B3 ENSIGHT: Keeping kids in the classroom I STONEBRIDGE front 131 Henry High chips away at t Computers, door monitors and special i :unch prh i.leges all have teen used to bring do«ni he absentee rate at die ]orih Alhmeapohs ichool, which had a big Problem nrith students fussing class. ly. Steve Brandt :far Tribune Staff Writer At Henry High School in Min - tcapolis, it's at Door 12 — the me closest to the parking lot — +•here the school's commitment o, cut truancy stops some stu- lents cold.- _ I As the first lunch period be- :ins well before 11 a.m.. Linda lunizicker and- Steve Gerber, chool deans, plant themselves to ice i phalanx of boisterous stu- lents headed out for lunch. Firm - y. but with a sense of humor, hey check ID cards for an orange. •ticker. No sticker, no eating out. Closing the doors to those tthout a sticker is one way Hen - i• discourages students from cut- ting Classes. Students with unex- `used absences lose their outside unch privileges. I Despite a preference for closed .ampuses by some community eadcrC. including Police Chief tobert Olson, Minneapolis high schools have taken a different route. :caving for lunch is a privilege ienied most ninth - graders, and sophomores at some schools. ninth- graders are most likely to :kip school, district records indi- ate. At Edison High School, upper - lassmen need a grade average nidway between a C and B to leave. Henn• adopted its lunch re- Inctions after computprized at- cndance records sit 'he pe- iod after lunch hac Ibsen - ocism. . Henry is ahir to anah•zr itr Star Triune Photo by Charles ajorgen Chimed Hubbard, a 10th - grader, went through the security check that's required to leave the building during lunch period at Henry High School In Minneapolis. Her badge was checked by Linda Huntzicker, a dean at the school. At left Is Rick Lebo, another dean, who asslsted with the monitoring. Students with unexcused absences lose their outside lunch privileges. it is testing specialized computer systems that eventually will be available districtwide. It can dem- onstrate with statistics and charts that there's a strong relation be- tween high attendance and better grades. It found that temperature doesn't affect attendance much until it dips below 10 below. The door monitors, deans to help with behavior issues, com- puter records and other techniques are part of an array of responses that make Henry a model for improving high school attendance. But it look what principal Mike Huerth describes as a free fall in attendance to trigger the response. Teachers at Henry used to flunk a student for missing a class 10 times. But nine years ago, the school dropped that police hr- cancrnfmncidr, +,, n,.•ilt,�„ Bob Lohn, who teaches indus- trial technology, could see the re- sults in his grade book. Absences grew each year and impeded his teaching because he had to repeat a skill two or three times. "You can't turn 'em loose on a table saw if they missed the demonstration the day before," Lohn said. Huerth authorized teachers to look for ways to improve attend- ance. Flunking for excessive ab- sences returned, with appeal rights. Incentives for perfect or high attendance were added to file school ceremonies celebrat- ing high or improved grades. Stu- dents with perfect records won T- shirts. certificates and a chance at a 5200 savings bond. Henry also tied its computer- ized attendance records to a , . . .. ..., ., .. bugs, it notifies parents when stu. dents are absent or lets them call in for an automatic update. Southwest High School used similar techniques last year to cut by two - thirds the number of freshmen with more than 10 ab- sences per trimester. The combination of techniques Henry uses has raised its atten- dance rate by 12 percentage points. "A lot of kids have more respect for adults -hen they set Emits and they make than follow through with consequences," said Mary Simon- Casati, an art teacher. But Henry's social worker, Pe- ter Bayer, says programs alone reduce truancy "if the com- doesn't sav, 'How come not in school ?' ... The bot. tor„ line needs to rri back to: County removes teenagers from suburban group homes "You have to maintain an arm's length with the vendor, but you have to have a little bit of a partnership," said Carol Ogren, assistant county administrator. "At the same time you have a public policy question: How far do you keep working with a ven- dor with taxpayer money who is not working out ?" Just initially agreed to discuss the county's handling of his con- tract and the low rates he was being paid. But he then said he needed time to consult a lawyer. He did not return subsequent telephone calls. In a letter to the county's Department of Children and Family Services, though, Just ex- pressed his frustration. "1 simply cannot carry on any longer," Just wrote in April. "if we do not get immediate relief from this imperiled financial position, we simply cannot pay our bills." Seven months later, the four Stonebridge homes are closed. Chronic complaints Problems at Stonebridge group homes did not develop overnight.. - Hennepin County and state licensing officials describe a "chronicity" of failures or slow- ness to respond to complaints. The group homes in question served male and female troubled teens, teaching them to live inde- pendently or preparing them to return home. They offered basic living skills and counseling, often with family members. Many clients had drug and alcohol problems The bulk of the business for the group homes' 35 beds was from contracts with Hennepin County through its Children and Family Services or Community Corrections departments. The kids were often placed in the homes through court order. After more than two decades as a contractor with the county, Just recently requested more money for staff. He made an additional plea this year after noting disparities in per diem rates between what he was paid and what the rounty paid similar reports were of runaways or med. ical problems at the group home. "We are constantly calling 911, and what are we getting? We are getting the police as baby sit. ters," neighbor Gail Dean told the Edina City Council at a meet- ing this summer. "I don't see anybody being taken care of. I don't see anyone responsible." State records this year also show investigations of residents sneaking friends in through win- dows and of female residents allowing male residents into their rooms without supervision. While the state conducted its review, Bloomington police were investigating problems at Stone= bridge's home at 10001 Lyndale Av. S. In January and early Februarv•. Bloomington police investigated a case in which a female worker was alleged to have had a sexual relationship with a teenage male client. Police conducted surveil- lance in which the woman and the teenage youth were observed kissing and fondling each other in a parking lot. The worker first denied the relationship to police, then • acknowledged that "mutual kissing had occurred. "These are not well-paid jobs. Leaving a young female person in charge of young male clients is an imitation to a problem," said Bloomington police detective Richard Grellis. In another case, police inves- tigated an assault by a male staff member on a male client in Au. ' gust. The client so far has refused to cooperate in the investigation: Criminal charges were not filed in either case. Stonebridge placed the worker on investiga- tive leave. and the state did not take further action. By spring. the state Department of Human Services had placed the Edina and Long fake group homes on probation for procedural viola. lions, including failure to check employees' backgrounds and maintenance probe -ms. Probational- means the state can inspet ilia• unan- nounced. Of th, J0 facilities licrmed 11V Thr Ct�tr, the Ct..nr -- VhMea 'is' efforts to fight Fruai'zcy j told mixed results Despite that success, some public officials blame the overall 3ck of improvement on chat hey perceive as a lukewarm re- ponse by top school officials onward improving attendance. - "It's been difficult to establish productive relationship with the 4inneapolis School District on his issue," said Mark Andrew, a number of the Hennepin County loard. (:Minneapolis Superintendent Icier Hutchinson said that al- hough student achievement bust be the district's top job, mproving attendance is increas- hg as a priority. "The No. I hurdle a kid has to ;et over in the morning is getting out the front door," he said. That hearts building an expectation :mong students, their families :nd the community at large that tudents must be in school. 'olerance by adults? later in life, focus groups with students and adults found lots of mixed messages about, truancy, including more tolerance than expected among adults. Although a specific antitruancy agenda was laid out early in 1995, the re- sponse has been a mixed bag: r► Al the county level, students referred by schools on truancy petitions now are quickly consid- ered by an interagency screening committee. The committee di- verts many truants to other ser- vices, such as county mental health programs or other family services. This has reduced the county attorney's filing of truancy cases by 58 percent. "That's a lot better than the previous system," said Hennepin County District Judge Tanya Bransford. But the social services needed to help truants haven't kept up with the number of truancy peti- tions, said Susan. Phillips, a Despite research linking a stu school social worker on the tent's.-truancy with juvenile screening group: - rime and a loss of earning power r► Meanwhile, the district still more responsive, localized com- puter systems to help keep track of absences and to trigger calls to patents. Schools say they need better computing tools within their buildings than the service they get from the district's main- frame computer. Pay now or pay later The push for truancy improve- ments has come primarily from County Attorney Mike Freeman and Mayor Sharon Sayles Belton. A new joint board to oversee these improvements will link the county, city and schools. Free- man said intervention pays off best with younger truants. "The simplistic answer is pay me now or pay me big later," said Freeman, comparing the annual cost of a student in school against the larger costs of a year's worth of prison or welfare benefits. At the Truancy Center in south Minneapolis, the staff waits for truants to be brought in by po- lice. Some precincts, most nota- bly the North Side Fourth Pre- cinct, are more aggressive in tru- ancy enforcement than others. The lack of numbers is frus- trating to LaRue Fields of the Minneapolis Urban League, which runs the center. She en- ....U... I „ . c1 ,LI but recognizes that they often higher priorities than driv- tudents across town. .,olice Chief Robert Olson agrees that it can be difficult. "One of the biggest hurdles is to convince the officers on the street that this is a good thing for them" because it keeps potential troublemakers off the streets, he said. At the center, truants meet with director Kevin Carlisle, with a school aide and sometimes with a police officer. They're asked questions to find out why they're not in school. "We find truancy is a real small issue compared to other issues going on in their lives," Fields said. One seen hadn't eat- en for four days, she said. While they're waiting for their parents to take them home or back to school, teens watch a video on truancy or curfew viola- lions. then they can watch KTCA- TV. Ch. 2. "Barney" and "Sesame Street" are their favorites. Meanwhile, officials struggle to finish putting in place the anti - truancy system they envisioned three years ago. "We're not there yet. We have to keep chipping and digging and pushing," Judge Bransford said. o1, • ,U,U d-U- I/LI U-1) IUI C.ILII UI the children in his group homes. Similar in- county group homes had per -day payments of more than S130 per day. "While 1 was trying to be a good soldier and do my pan to help in an ever increasingly tight financial climate as noted by Hennepin County, 1 find that everybody else has been pro- moted to general and removed from the battle," Just wrote. In one example of the finan- cial problems, Jerry's Foods of Edina sued Just in January when Stonebridge failed to pay a $4,900 food bill. The grocery set- tled in June for $2,000. Later, county officials were told of occasions when some of the homes had no food. An analysis of Just homes' finances by county officials in April showed they lost $158,000 from July 1994 to March 1996. Other problems also were de- veloping. Some of the most vocal com- plaints about Stonebridge come from neighbors of the Edina house, a sprawling stone rambler duplex just off France Av. Police were called to the block 111 times in the past 18 months, one of the city's highest number of residential calls to one block Most Ld.,L. SWU IC11\ &LI UIl, Ui1 UL IU1 of licensing fo; ' ^ Department of Human Sr "Most pro- viders do a gc Tough choices Faced with the imminent col- lapse of Stonebridge, county of- ficials agreed in the summer to increase their per diem rates. But the increase never materialized because of several concerns about the programs, including the assault case in Bloomington. Negotiations continued, and in September the rates were in- creased to $100 per day retroac- tive to June 1. The increase came after Just agreed to get out of the business. Acting County Administrator Jeff Spartz informed the County Board of the progress. "Based on inadequate re- sponse from Mr. Just regarding the multiple areas of concern that surfaced during the joint review. Children and Family Services and Community Corrections in- formed him that they were no longer confident about the qual- ity of the programs and would not make new placement refer- rals," Spartz % %Tote in September. The last of Stonebridge's cli- ents were moved at the begin- ning of the month — half re- turned to their homes and the others went to foster care or other group homes. "This put us between a rock and a hard place," said Henne- pin County's Ogren. "Whenever you close a place, you have to think 'What are you going to do to provide a replacement ?' " Just continues to try to sell the group homes. While buyers would have to obtain new licenses from the state, Just's conditional -u-se permits could be an enticement to a buyer for some of the homes because cities often are reluctant to grant new permits. As the negotiations continue, several interested parties look on, not the least of which are tfie neighbors of the Edina facility. Some neighbors want to keep other group homes out. Others just want to know who might be moving in. Mary Quinlivan, who lives less than 20 feet from the Edina home, said: "if there's going to be another group home moving in, l want it to be better managed — with somebody who cares about the kids this time." i :HAUDHARY fi onl 131 Youngdahl said, suggested Chaud- bert Humphrey Ill, Hennepin door knock for me. You weren't ' -'' .'` `.:.:; First= f4sian -�1 nierican "elected ; hary use a different first name on his campaign literature. County Attorney Mike Freeman and U.S. Rep. Bill Luther cam- there with a check for me. And now all of a sudden I'm your rep- . „.i1 , +:.'- "People thought he was going paigned for him, too. resentadve ? "': - , F MlnneSOta Legislature to lose because of his name and Now that he's won, Chaudhary, Garcia said she explained to the ,O the. .. `.: because of his race," Youngdahl whose parents: - moved to the group that she cared deeply about _ ,. ._•.- 1 ; •y, ;1- -. -,�; said.... - United States from India about 30 their concerns but that they That seat had been held for hary, the election means more : Others wondered about years ago, said he'd be glad if needed to team to work with each nore than 20 years by DFLer. than simply increasing the racial Chaudhary's youth. He's 27. Asian- Americans come to him other — and to lean on their own Payne Simoneau: diversity of the Legislature.: ` ".::: Youngdahl and Chaudhary, - with problems. representatives. That's a talk she ; Simoneau resigned in 1995 to ake a job as deputy director of the .. It means he gets the opportuWty o serve as a source of pride for who has a law degree from the University of Minnesota and is Whose legislator? said Chaudhary may well have to have himself one day. late_• Employee, Relations De -, some_ in the growing Asian -., marketing director for an interna- Edwina Garcia, a DFLer who Chaudhary isn't worrying oartment Carlson won the special American communities of the Twin' tional distributor in Fridley, stuck has represented Richfield since about that these days, though. :lection. to succeed him and., Cities. And it means the people of _ to a simple strategy to overcome 1990, said Chaudhary can count He's still happy about the victory. it ••ved in the 1996 Legislature be -, L 52A, 95 percent of whom are white, -- whatever qualms residents might on hearing from Asian Americans, He said the local Asian- Indian ore losing the seat to Chaudhary: ! didn't see Chaudhary's race as a..; have had. They got out and met whether or not they live in his dis- community is planning a celebra- f, Chaudhary was one of the few •"reason not to give him their votes. . residents one -on -one, over and trict- tion Saturday at the New Brighton Nallengers to defeat an incum:r:'" For that.' Chaudhary said he is "over again. 'He door - knocked the • Garcia recalled an encounter Family Service Center. tent in this month's elections. His. grateful and immensely proud. : - district five times from May to that occurred during her first term The Indian counsel general is :lection means the number of 7 "My family's roots go quite November,' Youngdahl said. 'My when some Hispanics approached flying in from Chicago, Chaud- ninorities in the Legislature will deep in this district," he said, "f feeling was that if he could meet her for help. hart•said. emain four. Harold (Skip) Finn, grew up here. I've done a lot of people, talk to people, you'd cut "I was very busy," Garcia said. "There is no sense of vindica- ortears the oniv American Indian work here." down on the number of people "I had a full legislative plate. They tion." he said of his victory. "My n. the Legislature, resigned this Still. Chaudhary's campaign who would be bothered by the age said, '"Fell, you're our repre- whole thing is whoever has an urnmer after being convicted of manager, Jon Youngdahl, knew issue and the race issue." semative.' I said,'Oh really? "'here issue, whether it's working fam- nishandling Leech Lake Band of some were curious about Chaud- It didn't hurt that prominent do you live? You weren't there to ilies, veterans, the disabled, they :hippeswa funds. But for Chaud- han••s race. Political insiders, DFLers like Attorney General Hu- vote for me. You weren't there to have a strong ally in me." Ld.,L. SWU IC11\ &LI UIl, Ui1 UL IU1 of licensing fo; ' ^ Department of Human Sr "Most pro- viders do a gc Tough choices Faced with the imminent col- lapse of Stonebridge, county of- ficials agreed in the summer to increase their per diem rates. But the increase never materialized because of several concerns about the programs, including the assault case in Bloomington. Negotiations continued, and in September the rates were in- creased to $100 per day retroac- tive to June 1. The increase came after Just agreed to get out of the business. Acting County Administrator Jeff Spartz informed the County Board of the progress. "Based on inadequate re- sponse from Mr. Just regarding the multiple areas of concern that surfaced during the joint review. Children and Family Services and Community Corrections in- formed him that they were no longer confident about the qual- ity of the programs and would not make new placement refer- rals," Spartz % %Tote in September. The last of Stonebridge's cli- ents were moved at the begin- ning of the month — half re- turned to their homes and the others went to foster care or other group homes. "This put us between a rock and a hard place," said Henne- pin County's Ogren. "Whenever you close a place, you have to think 'What are you going to do to provide a replacement ?' " Just continues to try to sell the group homes. While buyers would have to obtain new licenses from the state, Just's conditional -u-se permits could be an enticement to a buyer for some of the homes because cities often are reluctant to grant new permits. As the negotiations continue, several interested parties look on, not the least of which are tfie neighbors of the Edina facility. Some neighbors want to keep other group homes out. Others just want to know who might be moving in. Mary Quinlivan, who lives less than 20 feet from the Edina home, said: "if there's going to be another group home moving in, l want it to be better managed — with somebody who cares about the kids this time." Neighbors, nity try -1) quiet teenagers ■ State has Stonebridge group home on probation through March I. By Jeffrey Pieters Stafl' Writer Twenty feet from her bedroom window, Mary Quinlivan's next. door neighbors gather at night to smoke and talk. 'talking leads to swearing, and swearing leads to fighting — which leads to Quinlivan calling Edina police. Her neighbors are the eight teenage residents or the Stone - bridge group home at 3930 W. 49th St. The decade -old center is intended to tench youths how to live independently. The problem, Quinlivan and others say, is that the youths are too independent — of the rules for being a good neighbor, that is. Residents told the Edina City Council about the neighborhood un —st at the June 17 meeting. ,ry year about this time r the noise, the horribly L e rap music, the fighting, the language," Quinlivan said. "1Ve hear the F -word 50 times a day," she said. "Unfortunately, that's not against the law, so we wait until we hear a right before we call police." Edina police responded to 111 calls for E -911 service to the 3900 block of West 49th Street in Elie past 18 months, most of them reports of runaway Stone - bridge residents. Twenty -six calls were from Stonebridge's neighbors, but only seven of them were pertain. ing to the group home, according to police records. The number would be higher, Quinlivan said, but "one reason I don't call police more is I'm scared of retaliation." HOME: To Page 7A Arden Park marches With some parents leading the way, the children of Arden Park neighborhood ride their bicycles in Edina's Fourth ofJul% parade— (lie first in eight years. Organizers say they want the parnde.to become an annual event. (David Eyestone/Staft Photographer) School policy an attempt to smoke out tobacco user ■ Classes to help employ- ees learn to stop smoking By Jeffrey Pieters Staff Writer It is commonly said: Where there's smoke, there's fire. The Edina Board of Educa. tion says: Ifyou smoke, you will be fired. Termination is the final step in a new policy designed to curb smoking on school gruunds. The board discussed Elie policy June 17 and plans to approve it at the July 15 meeting. The policy would go into ef. feet Aug. 15. Part of a series of policies that affects employees, students and school visitors who smoke, the policy only legislates tobac- co use while at school. One community health leader said the new policy is a good start. "I think the steps they've taken are definitely in the right direction," said Dr. Douglas Lambert, chairperson of the city's Community Health Ser. vices Advisury Committee. "They're going to take u posi. tive approach to it and ulfer staff a smoking cessation program," he said. For u first violation, employ. ees will gut it written warning. Subsequent offenses result in notations to employee files, a three -day suspension, and ter- mination. The severity of some penal. ties varies depending on whether the employee has en. tered a smoking cessation pro- gram, the policy said. Officials at each school will determine students' penalties. District Superintendent Ken- neth Dragseth said the district is investigating the possibility its medical carrier will ullur clin- ics hir employees ttr slop smok- ing. The district itself offers smoking cessatinn classes lhruugh community education. Lambert suid that alunning increases in the number of tee who smoke were part of the r son his committee got involvt One -third of Edina's hi school seniors said they smt regularly, meaning at least or a week. "That was something th sparked us to get going wi this; he said. In what Lambert and oth, described as an unusual me% Edina Mayor Fred Richar wrote a letter to the Board Education, urging they b: smoking on school grounc strengthen penalties, offer cc sutiun classes — then moniE the situation to make sure t. rules are being followed. Sprinklers prevented spread of fire, - hi h chief says g � s Y ■ Twelfth-floor blaze af- fected only one apartment. By Jeffrey Pieters Staff Writer fated sprinklers made a I a job of putting out a po. tentially disastrous fire July 4. Edina Fire Chief Ted foul. ,ranz credited two sprinklers with containing the blaze that started in a 12th floor apart- ment at 7151 York Ave. S. That made the job that much easier fur the four -man crew that responded to the 6:48 p.m. call. "Ifthey couldn't stop the fire, I couldn't get enough guys to put out the fires in the two adjacent apartments," he said. ThecityofEdina has required high -rise apartments built in the past 20 years to have sprinkler systems, Paulfranz said. The building at 7151 York Ave. S. was Elie first one built under that rule. Besides the sprinklers, the building has a ventilation design that works to keep smoke from spreading tc other apartments. According to an Edina Fire Department report, the fire started when a number of ex. tension cords hooked up to an electrical outlet short - circuited. The fire spread from the smoldering cords to a chair and the living room carpeting. The two sprinklers, at appo- site ends of the room, were de. signed to activate when room temperatures exceeded 165 de. grees Fahrenheit. Because both sprinklers acti- vated, Paulfranz said, "My guess is we had a fairly long, slow buildup of heat." According to Pat Lamb, vice president of the building's man- agement company, the apart- ment's two residents had left on a vacation no more than an hour befure Elie fire was reported. While the fire and smoke did. n't spread, apparently the water used to extinguish the blaze did, soaking apartments all the way down to the ground floor, causing extensive water damage, accor, ing to the fire department repor The 12 -story building he 264 units and about 315 res dents, Lamb said. The facility houses senior ages 62 and up, including thou who receive state rent assi Lance under Section 8. According to Paulfranz, tt. only high -rise without sprir klers is the 17 -story structure i. 6400 Barrie Road, which wa built before the city wrote its o! dinance. Edina Sun-CurrenWYednesday, July. 10, 1996 7A Home: Stonebridge cited for disrepair, missing policies From Page LA According to Gail Dean, another resi- dent who spoke at the City Council meet- ing, the male residents of the group home harass her daughter. 'You have 18- year -old boys pounding on the windows at her and me, too,' she said. The condition of the home is deterio- raling. Dean said, and the young resi- dents even sometimes have bonfires in the front yard of the double bungalow. 'The list goes on and on,'she said.'IL's like a cycle.' Though the residents took their com- plaint to the City Council, there is little civic authorities — other than polico — can do to assuage their concerns. The group home is under the jurisdic- tion of the Minnesota Department of Human Services, and is to be run accord- ing to state statutes listed in Rule 8. But the center has run aground of its requirements enough times to be placed on probation, said Julie Reger, a unit manager at the department who oversees residential homes for children. Putting a program on probation is rare, Reger said: Of the 680 programs the state. department licenses, less than 10 are so sanctioned. Stonebridge — formerly called The Welcome Home — was put on probation after it failed to comply with the direc- tives of three correction orders in Febru- ary. April and May. In part, the correction orders required Stonebridge to clean ceilings, walls, car- pets and bathroom fixtures, patch holes in a bedroom wall and a bathroom door, install new kitchen linoleum, and fix bro- ken living -room furniture. Stonebridge lacked a written descrip- tion of the program specifying how one would graduate from it and who would make that determination, according to the correction order. Some employees' files lacked criminal background checks, the order said. The order also said that Stonebridge lacked written policies to prohibit em- ployees from abusing prescription drugs, or procedures for collecting a portion of the money earned by working residents — how the group home is supposed to col- lect part of its income. No financial plan existed to demnn- strata how Slnnehridge might generate money to continue operating and prodd- ing its services, according to the order. Stonebridge failed to document annu- al dental exams for, its residents, the order said. Probation means inspectors could ran- domly visit the center to check on its progress toward complying with the order, Reger said. The probation is in effect through March 1. If Stonebridge doesn't adhere to state law by that time, its license could be suspended or revoked, or the home's own- ers could be fined, Reger said. Stonebridges parent organization, Croup H Inc., is headed by James Just of Minnetrista. Group H has group homes in Bloomington, Brooklyn Center and Long Lake, as well. Kathryn Just, also of AlinneLrisln, is the administrntor of the Edina facility. Neither of the Justs were available for comment. Jennifer Gasper -Damm is Stane- bridge's program director. She did not re- turn phone calls either. Molly Anderson, crime prevention specialist-for the Edinn Police Depart- ment, said she has tried to meet with James Just and Casper -Damm several Limes. with no success. After several meetings fell through — canceled or, in some cases. Just and Gasper -Domm simply didn't show up — her interest lagged. Anderson said. After police sent a letter informing Stonebridge officials of their plan to step up patrnls in the arcs, those officials re- sponded, saying they wanted to meet with police, Chief Bill Bemhjelm said. That meeting, scheduled for July 3, was also canceled at their request, Bern - hjelm said. Local agency explains Medi Complicated program generates many questions pro By Thomas Swift Staff Writer Medicare originated in 1965 during the Lyndon Johnson administration and was enacted in 1966. To commemorate the 30th anniversary of Medicare, the federal government issued a handbook last month to each of the 40 million re- cipients of the program. The handbook is a 30 -page supple- ment to the guide each recipient is given upon enrollment into the program. It con- tains facts, figures and regulations about Medicare, designed to give beneficiaries necessary and up-to -date information. Unfortunately, the complexity of the information regarding Medicare often generates more questions. Fortunately, Hennepin County resi- dents have a resource center for their questions. Senior Community Services is in its third year of offering 'Health In- surance Help,' a program that gives free advice and counseling to older adults and disabled Medicare beneficiaries within Hennepin County. The program works like this: A person with a question or a problem regarding any aspect of their policy can call or stop . Vie Wl ost ?/jjerr�nr�tLCe VRGat[DYtS 7CUMIS109n, agonutT, by one of several locations throughout the County and talk with one of30 trained volunteers, said Sandy Miller, a co -coor- dinator of program in Eden Prairie. The biggest thing we do -is we help people-look at options for insurance Plana.* Miller said. 'But we are a sepa- rate entity. We do not have as affiliation with an insurance company. 'We do have the most up-to -date in- formation to offer people because our pro- gram is administered through the feder- al government. We get the news on changes in the program first -hand and we have the resources to monitor the var- ious health insurance policies.' The main phone number to call to get in touch with a Medicare counselor or to set up an appointment in your home or at a designated location is 541 -1019. There are also various times and loca- tions set up at area senior centers. For more information, in Eden Prairie, 949- 8478; Minnetonka, 939.8393; Edina, 920- 1115; Bloomington, 948.3949. Locations in Richfield and Robbinsdale will also be opening soon, according to Libby Hansen, the program's other co- coordina- tor in Minnetonka. Among the most used aspect of the r--- - - - - -- I MAMA US � I ITALIAN &%AMERICAN I 20%OFF tap1�e I I Early Bird Special I 4 p.m: 6 p.m. -or- ,g, Purchase any entree and gel the second of It - Purchase /2 PRICE I For now, Bernhjelm said, his depart ment will treat Stonebridge residen like any juvenile offenders. 'Just because a kid is placed in a group home doesn't mean he has carte blanche to do what he feels like,' the chief said. Stonebridge is required to provide 24. hour staffing, according to Rule 8. Bern - hielm said officers have never found the center without a counselor. The problem seems to he one of le- niency, lie said: the perception of what sorts of behavior are appropriate in a res- idential area. "That's the neighborhood quality -of- life stuff we're working on," he said. Anderson and Bernhjelm have sug- gested mediation to the residents and Stonebridge officials. but have been un- successful. Stonebridge houses four boys and four girls, ages 13 to 17, in separate halves of a double bungalow. Because it is a Rule 8 group home, Stonebridge accepts youths with a vari- ety of personal problems, including those pertaining to family relations and drugs and alcohol use, Reger said. They're actually preparing these chil- dren to live on their own outside of the home,' Reger said. County human services officials place residents at Stonebridge. The youths can come from any Minnesota county. care to recipients in area gram, Miller said, is help deciphering the paper work. 'We help a lot of people file claims and file appeals on their medical bills," Miller said. 'We estimated that we saved people about $305,000 last year in bills that were filed fraudulent or incorrect.' Jean Johnson, a former resident of Richfield, who has since moved to Min- neapolis, received ouch assistance from the program when her husband died a year a half ago. The hospital bills got really compli- cated and some of them got mixed up with another patient with the same name,' she said. 'I called the program and they said, 'sure, we can take care of that' They helped me with everything I needed and made me feel like it wasn't a big deal.' Anne Walker received assistance after moving to Eden Prairie from Michigan last fall. '( needed to make a decision about whether . f wanted to stay with the cur- rent health plan I was getting from Michigan or whether I should change to one in Minnesota," said Walker, who is legally blind. "All this paper work start- ed coming. It was unbelievable. 'I was so grateful there was some one out there to help. It was very complicat- ed, believe me." Miller said individual groups provide similar services, but they charge fees and usually focus on one aspect or another. Health Care Help, she said, is an all -en- compassing program. 'Our mission is to provide accurate and objective assistance and advocacy re- lating to all medical care and Medicare; Miller said. The reason why we have such a good program is that we have the resources to do it.' In their first year of service, 1$94, Hansen said the program assisted 200 people. In 1995, that number more than doubled. Already this year, she estimates that 300 people have been served. 'People can be overwhelmed, con- fused, anxious, with all of the rules and regulations," Hansen said. "We try to al- leviate fears.' Audrey Lindahl is another Hennepin County resident who was aided by calling Health Care Help. "A about a year ago, I became blind after a loss of blood flow, kind of like what Kirby (Puckettl has,' she said. 'That's when I became eligible (for disabilityl. 'And I can tell you, the service was fantastic. l knew nothing about it before 1 called —and I think that's the problem, most people don't know about it. I feel guilty sometimes that I call so often.' WernessBrothers FUNERAL CHAPELS i G. Robert Wcrncss John L v6crness Charles J. Sunder Vice President President General Manager State of Minnesota Department of Human Services Human Services Building 444 "yeae Road St. Paul, Minnesom 55155 June 21, 1996 Mr. James Just Executive Director, Group H. Inc. 4250 Stonebridge Circle Minnetrista, Minnesota 55364 r. Dear Mr. Just: RE: License #808544 R8; Probation On May 22, 1996, the Department of Human Services (DHS), Division of Licensing, received your request for reconsideration of an .Order of Probation dated May 8, 1996, for the Stonebridge program located at 3930 West 49th Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424. - I. PROBATION DISPUTED: The Order of Probation stated: 1. You are hereby notified that, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 245A.07, the Commissioner of the Department of Human Services is making probationary the license to provide group home services for children under Minnesota Rules, parts 9545.1400 through 9545.1500 (Rule 8), issued to Stonebridge located at 3930 W. 49th Street, Edina, MN 55424.. The license is being made probationary until January 1, 1997. The reasons for the Order of Probation are as follows: 1. Important program policies and procedures documenting compliance with the rule were not available for review. They are as follows: Minnesota Rules, part 9543.1020, subpart 14, the policy prohibiting abuse of prescription medication by staff and Minnesota Rules 9543.1020, subpart 15.B, the policy on who makes the decision to return or not return the rent money to the client upon discharge from'-the program. 2. The license holder's personnel files did not document the following compliance issues: Minnesota Rules, part 9543.3040, subpart 2, requiring that a completed background study form for each individual working in a position allowing direct contact with persons served had been submitted. 3. The license holder's client files did not contain the following client information: Minnesota Rules, part 9545.1450, subpart 8, documentation of an annual dental exam. 4. The license holder did not submit financial records, Minnesota Rules, part 9545.1430, subpart 4, and 9545.1460, subpart 2. 5. The license holder did not submit a .plan for cleaning and maintenance repairs. Minnesota Rules, part 9545.1410. ANEQUAL OPPORTUN=FAfPLOYER OMIYD' ►LL4 Janes Just ,ge 2 . ne 21, 1996 Documents requested in the Correction Order dated February 15, submitted by the deadline stated in the Correction Order. 1996, were not 7. Seven of seven citations issued in the Correction February 6 were not corrected as of April 17, 1996, the date the follow-up vis•to the Stonebidge Program in Edina. TERMS OF PROBATION You may continue to operate with a probationary license under the following conditions: comply with all rules and statutes governing the operation 'of a 1. The license holder must Rule 8 group home. 2. The license holder must comply with the citations in the correction order letter by the indicated dates. 3. No new variances will be processed during this probationary period, unless the license holder can demonstrate an over - riding need for the variance and can document /demonstrate alternative. measures to meet the intent of the rule requirements in order to protect the individuals health and safety. Your licensor will continue to monitor your compliance with any and all applicable laws and rules. Verification of compliance may include unannounced visits. Failure to comply with the conditions of your probationary license or any other provisions of Minnesota Rules and Laws may result in further negative action, including revocation of your license. II. LICENSE HOLDER'S REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION: Mr. Just wrote: I am writing to request reconsideration of an Order of Probation (see enclosed copy) for this request are as follows: The reasons In response to the reasons for the Order of Probation noted: 1. The policy on who makes the decision to return or not return the lclient was presented.- The revised policy prohibiting abuse of prescription medication was available in the hands of the Program Director when requested on April 17, 1996, since it was being reviewed for distribution to all staff. I, myself, was present at the ai Edina facility should t the time of this visit and spoke directly with the licensor, indicating a there be any question or concern _which could not be. addressed y the Program Director who had just recently returned from extended family leave. I had a copy of the revised policy as did the Director of Clinical Services who also was on the premises. The Licensor did not elect to speak with me about this. If she had done so, she could have seen the policy noted. 2, The Program Director states that documentation regarding background study forms was presented. James Just ge 3 ne 21, 1996 3. The Program Director states that dental exams were documented except incases of new . residents for whom dental exams were scheduled and so noted. There was one exception where a resident had not had a dental exam and for whom repeated appointments were made, but not kept as a result of avoidance on the part of the resident. (This is offered as fact, not excuse; we should have seen to it that an appointment was made and kept. We have now done so.) 4. Financial records had been submitted by me directly at a prior date. 5. This was not done by the time specified in the Correction Order of February 15, 1996. 6. This was not done by the time specified in the Correction Order of February 15, 1996. 7. This was not done by the time specified in the Correction Order of February 15, 1996. As to numbers 5, 6, and 7, as well as the entire Correction Order of February 15, 1996, I had trade telephone contact with the Licensor (leaving a message on her recorder) prior to the stated deadline in the Correction Order indicating that I was not able to respond by the deadline and asking specifically whether I should note that in writing.. I did not receive any response. Our Program Director was on leave from February 14, 1996, to April 1, 1996, and her absence presented difficulty meeting the deadline for response: In speaking with the Licensor myself at the time of her visit of April 17, 1996, I again told her directly that our response had not yet been mailed, but that it should be in the trail the following day or so. She did not indicate that that was a problem. Our detailed and specific response was indeed sent the following day (April 18, 1996) and would have been received well before the date of the Order for Probation (May 8, 1996). I must raise a concern with regard to the stated Terms of Probation. Should it be determined that the probationary status will be in effect, I fully understand conditions 1 and 2, but 3 does not seem to be connected to the reasons stated for'the Order of Probation. Certainly we would observe and do now observe the conditions noted, but, since the program specifically serves, only older adolescents, there is always the possibility of a variance request and the refusal to process same (if I understand the terms properly) seems unwarranted. Finally, I should note that this Order of Probation was not delivered as required. According to DHS Rule 17 Notice of Probation, the Commissioner shall give a license holder notice of probation as required under Minnesota Statutes, section 245A.07, subdivision 3, which states specifically that this notice shall be certified mail, as must be our response if we . choose to make one. This Notice of Probation was not by certified mail. Most assuredly, I do not want to claim a "technicality" in this matter and try to hide behind it. I raise this point because it seems that the action taken is largely a reflection more of the letter of the law than the spirit of the law. Such being the case, it seems to be a pertinent point. If at all possible, I would appreciate the opportunity to present our request for Reconsideration in person. We will make ourselves available ' at whatever time and place you may specify. I James Just ge 4 ne 21; 1996 III. DEPARTMENTS RESPONSE: The reconsideration process is based on a review of the licensing record and written arguments or evidence submitted by the license holder in support of the request for reconsideration. The process does permit license holders or licensors to present in person arguments in support of or opposition to the licensing action. As such, the license holders request to meet in person is denied. The license holder stated that the Order of Probation did not comply with Minnesota Rules and Statutes because it was not sent by certified mail. He is correct.' The record indicates that the licensor conducted a licensing visit on February 5, 1' 996. Following the visit, a Correction Order with seven citations was issued to the program on February 15, 1996. The dates for correcting the licensing violations varied but all violations had to be corrected by March 25, 1996. _ On April 17, 1996, the licensor conducted a second review. At that time, none of the citations identified in the February 15, 1996, Correction Order had been corrected. With respect to the dental records, the license holder stated the single exception was due to a resident's failure to keep his or her dental appointment. The citation identifies two records where there was no documentation of annual dental exams. With respect to the telephone contact with the licensor, the license holder indicated that he had made telephone contact with the licensor prior to the stated deadline indicating that he was not able to respond by the deadline and asking whether he should state that in writing. The licensors telephone log indicates that on February 6, 1996, at 8:45 a.m. the licensor left a voice message with Mr. Just asking him to send financial records i.e., county contract, budget, audit, etc. On February 8, 1996, at 9:30 a.m. the licensor left a second message stating it was very important that she talk to Mr. Just. At 11:00 a.m. Mr. Just called the licensor. The licensor stated that she needed the financial information by early next week. On February 14, 1996, at 7 a.m., Mr. Just left a message on the licensor's answering machine saying the financial information would be in soon. The license holder wrote; "Our Program Director was on leave from February 14, 1996, to April 1, 1996, and her absence presented difficulty meeting the deadline for response. In 1 The failure to send the.mail by certified mail was not an error made by the Division of Licensing. when the mail left the Division of Licensing it was clearly marked that it should be sent by certified mail. The Department's post office failed to send the letter by certified mail. Since the discovery of this error, a special process has been established to prevent this type of error from recurring. The error will be corrected by sending a second, Order of Probation by certified mail to the license holder. However, the Department will not penalize the license holder by delaying action on the license holder's request for reconsideration and it will not be necessary to send a second request for reconsideration of the Order of Probation. James Just ge 5 ne 21, 1996 speaking with the Licensor myself at the time of her visit of April 17, 1996, 1 again told her directly that our response had not yet been mailed, but that it should be in the mail the following day or so." The program director apparently returned on April, 1, 1996. However, at the time of the licensor's visit on April 17, 1996, the license holder's response had not yet been mailed. A review of the record does not indicate that the licensing action was inappropriate. The license holder failed to take the necessary corrective action ordered in the Correction Order dated February 15, 1996. The license holder failed to comply with required corrective action by the dates specified by the licensor. It is appropriate to take additional licensing action when a license holder fails to comply with earlier citations. A review of the record does not indicate that the licensing citation was inappropriate. IV. DISPOSITION The Commissioner's review of your request for reconsideration and the supporting information provided resulted in the finding that there is no indication that the licensing action was inappropriate. Due to the need to monitor compliance with required corrective actions, the Commissioner has determined that the probationary status of your license to provide services under Minnesota Rules, parts 9545.1400 to 9545.1500 (Rule 8) is affirmed. The license holder expressed concern about the terms of probation questioning whether.the refusal to process a variance was warranted. The Department's authority to grant a variance is permissive. The Department is not required to grant a variance for the convenience of a program. Therefore, unless there is a compelling need fora variance, it is reasonable to inform the license holder that a variance will not be granted during the period of probation. The terms of probation are those stated in' the Order of Probation dated May 8, 1996. The period of probation begins on June 22, 1996, and ends on March 1, 1997. The Commissioner's determination of your request for reconsideration is a final agency decision and subject to further review only through a Petition for Writ of Certiorari filed with the Minnesota Court of Appeals and served on the Commissioner within 60 days of your receiving notice of the Commissioner's response to your reconsideration request. See Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 606 and Minnesota Rules of Appellate Procedure 115. If you have any questions concerning this response, contact Julie Reger at (612) 296 -0156. Yara , st , Sup rvi r Division of Licen g State of Minnesota Department of Human Services Human Services Building 444 Lafaveae Road Sr. Paul. Minnesom 55155 May 8, 1996 License Number: 808544 Rule 8 James Just Executive Director, Group H, Inc. 4250 Stonebridge Circle Minnetrista, MN 55364 CERTIFIED MAIL ORDER OF PROBATION Dear Mr. Just: You are hereby notified that; pursuant.to Minnesota Statutes, section 245A.07, the Commissioner of the Department.of Human Services is making probationary the license to provide group home services for children under Minnesota Rules, parts 9545.1400 through 9545.1500 (Rule 8), issued to Stonebridge located at 3930 W. 49th Street, Edina, MN 55424. The license is being made probationary. until January 1, 1997. The reasons for the Order of Probation are as follows: 1. Important program, policies and.procedures documenting compliance with the rule were not available for review. They are as follows: Minnesota Rules 9543.1020, subpart 14, the policy prohibiting_ abuse of prescription medication by-staff and Minnesota Rules 9543.1020, subpart 15.B, the policy on who makes the decision to return or not return the rent money to the client upon discharge from the program. 2. The license holder's personnel files did not document the following compliance issues: Minnesota Rules, part 9543.3040, subpart 2, requiring that a completed background study form for each individual working in a position - allowing direct contact with persons served had been submitted. 3. The license holder's client files did not contain the following client information: Minnesota Rules, part 9545.1450, subpart 8, documentation of an annual dental exam. AN EQUAL OPPORTUN 17YEWPLOYER 6 .r T u.q , Mr. James Just Page 2 May 16, 1996 4. The license holder did not submit financial records, Minnesota Rules, part 9545.1430, subpart 4, and 9545.1460, subpart 2. S. The license holder did not submit a plan for cleaning and maintenance repairs Minnesota Rules, part 9545.1410. 6. Documents requested in the Correction Order dated February 15, 1996 were not submitted by the deadline stated in the Correction Order. 7. Seven of seven citations issued in the Correction Order dated February 15, 1996 were not corrected as of April 17, 1996, the date of the follow -up visit to the Stonebridge Program in Edina. TERMS OF PROBATION You may continue to operate with a probationary license under the following conditions: 1. The license holder must comply with all rules and statutes governing the operation of a Rule 8 group home. 2. The license holder must comply with the citations in the correction order letter by the indicated dates. 3. No new variances will be processed during this probationary period, unless the license holder can demonstrate an over - riding need for the variance and can document /demonstrate alternative measures to meet the intent of the rule requirements in order to protect the individual's health and safety. Your licensor will continue to monitor your compliance with any and all applicable laws and rules. Verification of compliance may include unannounced visits. Failure to comply with the conditions of your probationary license or any other provisions of Minnesota Rules and Laws may result in further negative action, including revocation of your license. RIGHT TO REQUEST RECONSIDERATION You have the right to request the Commissioner to reconsider this Order of Probation. A request for reconsideration must be made in writing, and must be received by the Commissioner by certified mail within ten (10) calendar days after you receive this notice that your license has been made probationary. You.may submit with your request for reconsideration written argument or evidence in support of your request. Your request for reconsideration must be sent to: f Mr. James Just Page 3 May 16, 1996 Commissioner Minnesota Department of Human Services c/o Licensing Division 444 Lafayette Road St. Paul, MN 55155 -3842 The commissioner's disposition of your request for reconsideration is final. If you have any questions regarding this letter, contact Julie Reger, Unit Manager, at (612) 296 -0156 immediately. Si rely r Burzin i, Supervisor D vi ion of Licensing c Family and Children's Services Division Carol Swanson, Community Resources Placement Coordinator Jennifer Gasper -Damm, Program Director State of Minnesota Department of Human Services Human Services Building 444 Way= Road Sr. Paul. Minnesom 55155 February 15, 1996 License number: 804466 R8 Mr. James Just Executive Director, Group H, Inc. 4250 Stonebridge Circle Minnetrista, MN 55364 Dear Mr. Just: CORRECTION ORDER On February 5, 1996, Stonebridge Programs, located at 3930 W. 49th Street, Edina, MN 55424 was reviewed to determine compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Rules, parts 9545.1400 through 9545.1500, 9543.1000 through 9543.1060, 9555.8000 through 9555.8500, which govern the licensure of group homes. The licensed capacity of the program was ten. At the time of the review, eight were receiving services. VIOLATIONS AND CORRECTION ORDERS The following violation(s) of state and (or) federal laws and rules were observed. Corrective action for each violation is required by Minnesota Statutes, section 245A.06, and is hereby ordered by the Commissioner of Human Services. Failure to correct the violations within the prescribed amount of time may result in fines and /or action against your license, as provided for in Minnesota Statutes, sections 245A.06 and 245A.07. To assist you in complying with the correction orders, a "suggested method of correction" may be included for any or all of the violations cited. Please be advised that a "suggested method of correction" is only a suggestion and you are not required to follow the "suggested method of correction." Failure to follow the "suggested method of correction" will not result in a fine or an action against your license. However, regardless of the method used, you are required to correct the violation(s) within the prescribed amount of time. ANEQUAL OPPORTUNRYEMPLOYER M%"&W U a James Just Page 2 February 14, 1996 1. Citation: Minnesota Rules, part 9545.1450, subpart 8. Violation: In one of two open client records reviewed, there was no documentation of an annual dental exam. Corrective Action Ordered: Immediately, and on an ongoing basis, there needs to be documentation in each client's file indicating the date and provider of the dental services. 2. Citation: Minnesota Rules, part 9543.1020, subpart 14. Violation: The license holder lacked a policy prohibiting individuals while directly responsible for individuals served by the program from abusing prescription medication. There was no documentation showing that the license holder had provided training to staff on a policy prohibiting abuse of prescription medication and prohibiting being under the influence of a controlled substance or alcohol. Corrective Action Ordered: By March 25, a policy that addresses these issues needs to be submitted. By March 25, documentation of this training needs to be submitted. 3. Citation: Minnesota Rules, part 9543.1020, subpart 15.B. Violation: There was no documentation regarding the policy the program has of collecting $1.00 for each hour the client works. There was also no documentation that specified who makes the decision to return the money to the client at the time of discharge, and what objective criteria are used to make the decision to return the money or not to return the money to the client at the time of discharge. There was no statement (at least quarterly) itemizing receipts and disbursements of client funds. Corrective Action Ordered: Immediately develop a policy documenting who makes the decision to return or not to return the client's money ($1.00 for every hour worked) to the client at the time of discharge, and what objective criteria are used to make the decision to return the money or not to return the money to the client at the time of discharge. The license holder also needs to issue a statement (at least quarterly) Itemizing receipts and disbursements of clients' funds. Clients must sign for each financial transaction. 4. Citation: Minnesota Rules, part 9545.1430, subpart 4, and 9545.1460, subpart 2. Violation: The license holder had no plan of financing that gives assurance Of sufficient funds to enable it to carry out its defined purposes and to provide proper care for children. Corrective Action ordered: By March 25, 1996, submit a plan of financing that gives assurances of sufficient funds to enable the group home to I James Just Page 3 February 14, 1996 carry out its defined purposes and :o provide proper care for children. The license holder must have financial records available at the group home. 5. Citation: Minnesota Rules, part 9545.1430, subpart 2. Violation: The written description of the program lacked documentation of how it is determined that a client may graduate from the program and who makes this determination. Corrective Action Ordered: By March 25, 1996, submit a written description of the program that specifies how (and who determines that) a client may graduate from the program. 6. Citation: Minnesota Rules, parts 9543.3040, subpart 2. Violation: The license holder did not have documentation showing that a completed background study form for each individual working in a position allowing direct contact with persons served by the program was submitted with license renewal application. Corrective Action Ordered: Immediately remove all direct contact employees and contractors for whom a completed background study form has not been submitted from positions allowing direct contact with persons receiving services until such competed form is submitted. By March 1, 1996, submit documentation evidencing how the license holder has complied with this requirement. 7. Citation: Minnesota Rules, part 9545.1410. Violation: The license holder has failed to establish and maintain the proper resources as evidenced by: Section of the building housing male clients: a. living room ceiling is dirty; b. chairs and sofas in living room are broken; c. carpets in all of the rooms are soiled; d. no shades or blinds in the bedrooms; e. bedroom walls and ceilings are dirty; f. bathroom ceiling is dirty and has paint peeling; g. bathtub is dirty; h., bathroom walls need cleaning; i. bathroom door needs repairing (large holes in door; some holes are filled in with tissue paper); J. mildew on bathroom walls. I James Just Page 4 February 14, 1996 k. all bedrooms were messy with personal property on the floor. Section of the building housing female clients: a. kitchen linoleum worn out; holes in linoleum; b. carpets in all of the rooms are soiled; c. hole in wall (smaller bedroom); d. ceiling dirty (larger bedroom); e. walls dirty (larger bedroom); f. bathroom ceiling has paint peeling; g. both bedrooms were messy with personal property on the floor. Corrective Action Ordered: Within 48 hours of receipt of this letter bathrooms need to be scrubbed and clutter picked up off of the floors. - By March 25, 1996, submit a plan with dates specifying when each of the above violations will be corrected. Corrections need to made within the next 90 days. If you have any questions concerning this Correction Order, please contact me immediately. cerely, ulie Sailor Division of Licensing 296 -2539 cc: Children's Health Services AGENDA ITEM: VII.B. April 15, 1997 Dear Mayor.Smith and Edina City Council: We are a group of concerned neighbors strongly opposed to the operation of a Turning Point group home for troubled adolescent girls on W. 49th St. This letter is to go on record with our position and to outline the reasons why we feel this action is unfair, ill- advised and is likely to perpetuate a very unacceptable situation in our neighborhood. As you know, Stonebridge, Inc. operated a group home at this location for ten years. Neighborhoods were subjected to loud music, fighting late at night, constant abusive and obscene language, harassment by clients, vandalism, of their homes and cars, garbage strewn in their yards, and a general lack of upkeep to the yard and home. Over 100 police calls were made to the home in one 18 month period.(over 1995 and 1996). Some neighbors kept their complaints to a minimum, feeling powerless and fearing retaliation by these clients, many of whom had criminal records. Complaints to city, county and state representatives over the years yielded little response. At an April meeting with Turning Point county representatives and staff, neighbors expressed their outrage, frustration and fear of "more of the same ". Regardless of the great intentions and merits of a new program like Turning Point, we are not persuaded to support this plan. Similar assurances were made 10 :years ago by Stonebridge. Basically, who is accountable should similar problems arise? This is not a small matter, our peace of mind as individuals and the quiet and respectful nature of our neighborhood has been deeply disturbed. Many.of us are outraged by what appears to be "behind the scenes" dealing arranged by the county - to'the profit of Jim Just the irresponsible and unaccountable owner of Stonebridge, Inc. -It would seem that this is not in the spirit of the state law - which prohibits the transfer group home license. It is time for all parties to recognize this burden must be shared, We have had this group home as a neighbor for 10 years. If a group home of this type must be located in Edina, it is only fair that the burden should be shared elsewhere in the community. This group home may be an asset to the community at large, but it is a liability to its close neighbors. We require your active support. As quipped by a city council member the last time we brought this issue before you - "if the city attorney can spend his time on the problem of a barking dog ", why can't we get some help? Sincerely, chard CqG4ane 2� COUNCI, ECK REGISTER WED, APR 16, 1997, 8:47 PM Page CHECK NO DATE - - - - - -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 175664 04/21/97 04/21/97 • $148:89 $255.39 ADVANCED ADVANCED GRAPHICS SYSTEM SERVICE CONTRACTS EQU 009544- - -------------- ------ ----- ----- --- CENT SVC GENER SVC CONTR EQUI 5610 --- < *> $404.28* . GRAPHICS SYSTEM SERVICE CONTRACTS EQU 009617 CENT SVC GENER SVC - CONTR EQUI 5623 175665 04/21/97 04/21/97 $28.14 $20.29 AIRTOUCH AIRTOUCH CELLULAR TELEPHONE 032097 ED BUILDING & - TELEPHONE < *> $48.43* CELLULAR Cellular Invest 040197 - INVESTIGATION TELEPHONE 175666 04/21/97 04/21/97 _$2.56 $52.19 ALBINSON ALBINSON PRINTING 592297 INSPECTIONS PRINTING 04/21/97 $17.21 ALBINSON PRINTING PRINTING 592298 INSPECTIONS PRINTING- i < *> $71.96* 593098 INSPECTIONS PRINTING 175667 < > 04/21/97 $125.00 $125.00* ALGA S ' eminar registration 040497 ED'ADMINISTRAT CONF & SCHOOLS 175668 04/21/97 04/21/97 $84.00 $167.93 ALL FIRE ALL.FIRE TEST INC TEST SCBA Hydros 016050 FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP MAINT < *> $251.93* INC Extinguisher Maint 016051 FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP MAINT i 175669 <* 04/2.1/97 $1,500.00 $1,500.00* Amcon CM LLC Construction manageme 97192 TRAINING FACIL -i EQUIP REPLACEM i 175670 < *> 04/21/97 $39.95 $39.9 •AMERICAN FIRE JOURNAL 2 year subscripton 040797 FIRE DEPT. GEN DUES & SUBSCRI -5* 175671. *> 04/21/97 $97.00 AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD, T ADVERTISING OTHER 5093 ED ADMINISTRAT ADVERT OTHER < $97.00* 175672 04/21/97 04/21/97 $21.84 $54.26 AMERICAN AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY- 033197 GRILL LAUNDRY 04/21/97 $66.45 AMERICAN LINEN LINEN LAUNDRY- LAUNDRY 033197 50TH ST OCCUPA LAUNDRY 04/21/97 $14.36 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 033197 033197 VERNON SELLING LABORATORY LAUNDRY LAUNDRY 04/21/97 04/21/97 $247.41. $250.98 AMERICAN AMERICAN LINEN LINEN LAUNDRY 033197 FIRE DEPT. GEN LAUNDRY 04/21/97 $237.05 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY LAUNDRY 033197 YORK OCCUPANCY LAUNDRY < *> $892.35* 033197 CITY HALL GENE LAUNDRY 175673 < *> 04/21/97 $40.00 $40.00* APCO Dues- Police 041397 POLICE DEPT. G DUES & SUBSCRI` i 175674 < *> 04/21/97 $31.90 $31.90* AQUA ENGINEERING Sprinkler parts- 24548 SNOW & ICE REM GENERAL SUPPLI 5098 . 175675 04/21/97 04/21/97 $1,432.43 $6.70 ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO. ASPEN Diaphragm pump 471201 UTILITY PROG -MACH. & EQUIP 4202 < *> $1,439.13* EQUIPMENT CO. Cable 180092 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS ! 175676 04/21/97 04/21/97 $137.83 $30.16 ASTLEFORD ASTLEFORD EQUIPMENT COMP.Muffler T51425 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 4755 04/21/97 $69.67 ASTLEFORD EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT COMP Blade COMP End T51801 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 4908 04/21/91 $161.99 ASTLEFORD EQUIPMENT COMP Pin T52136 T52166 EQUIPMENT OPER EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5013 REPAIR *> 04/21/97 $43.86 ASTLEFORD EQUIPMENT COMP Asorber T52169 EQUIPMENT OPER PARTS 5014 REPAIR PARTS 5062 < $443.51* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, APR 16, 1997, 8:47 PM SUPPLI 5456 Electric /utilities 404992 PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPLI 5058 Phone battery D55977 GOLF ADMINISTR page CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 175677 *> 04/21/97 $257.65 AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES Cellular Invest -------------------------------=-------------------- 0331 INVESTIGATION TELEPHONE < 50TH ST SELLIN $257.65* OF GD - 175678 04/21/97 04/21/97 $31.70 $32.46 AT & T AT & T TELEPHONE 032797 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE < *> $64.16* TELEPHONE 033197 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE 175679 < *> 04/21/97 $20.80 $20.80* AT &T TELEPHONE 032497. CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE 175680 .04/21/97 $454.24 AUTO MACHINE AND SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES '033197/G MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $454.24* .175681 04/21/97 04/21/97 175682 04/21/97 175683 04/21/97 175684 04/21/97 175685 04/21/97 175686 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 175687 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 175688 04/21/97 c *> 175689 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 $90.95 Axner Co Inc $53.62 Axner Cc Inc $144.57* $100.00 B.H.Z. $100.00* $74.76 BACHMANS $74.76* $49.08, VhLDWIN SUPPLY CO. $49.081 *. $31.94 $31.94* $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 $150.00* $152.00 $406.30 $9.30 $54.50 $181.05 $45.50 $105.00 $95.35 $84.00 $1,133.00* $11.00 $11.00* $84.80 $181:20 $181.20 $73.60 BATTERIES PLUS COST OF GOODS SOLD 0069035 ART SUPPLY GIF COST OF GD SOL 4473 COST OF GOODS SOLD 00069475 ART SUPPLY GIF COST OF GD SOL 4473 Over pay- refund s bal 040797 EDINA ATHLETIC REGISTRATION F Supplies 032097 GOLF ADMINISTR GENERAL SUPPLI 5456 Electric /utilities 404992 PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPLI 5058 Phone battery D55977 GOLF ADMINISTR GENERAL SUPPLI 5536 BCA /Training & Developme CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS T003595 BCA /Training & Developme CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS T003600 BCA /Training & Developme CONFERENCES &SCHOOLS T003605 BCA /Training & Developme CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS T003607 BCA /Training & Developme CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS T003615 BCA /Training & Developme CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS T003624 BELLBOY CORPORATION BELLBOY CORPORATION BELLBOY CORPORATION BELLBOY CORPORATION BELLBOY CORPORATION BELLBOY CORPORATION BELLBOY CORPORATION BELLBOY CORPORATION BELLBOY CORPORATION Beloff, Emma BERGFORD TRUCKING BERGFORD TRUCKING BERGFORD TRUCKING BERGFORD TRUCKING POLICE DEPT.,G CONF & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS POLICE'DEPT. G'CONF & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 11532600 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 25346900 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 25347.100 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 25351500 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX GENERAL SUPPLIES . 25368900 YORK SELLING GENERAL SUPPLI COST OF-GOODS SOLD BE 11576660 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 25383000 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 25383100 VERNON.SELLING CST OF GDS MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MI.25416700 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX Class refund 040897 ART CNTR PROG REGISTRATION F Liquor delivery 033197/5 50TH ST'SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU Liquor delivery 033197/V VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU Liquor delivery 033197/Y YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU Liquor delivery, 041197/5 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU COUNCIL IECK REGISTER WED, APR 16, 1997, 8:47 PM Black, Archie ACO General supplies 041197 ANIMAL CONTROL GENERAL SUPPLI Blaylock Cancel job 97007780 GENERAL FD -PRO PLUMBING PERMI page CHECK NO - - - - -- DATE ----------- CHECK AMOUNT------ -- - - -- - - - - -- VENDOR------- -- DESCRIPTION - INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 175689 04/21/97 04/21/97 $142.30 BERGFORD TRUCKING - - - -- - - - - -- Liquor delivery ----------------- 041197/V VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU *> $134.80 BERGFORD TRUCKING Liquor delivery 041197/Y YORK'SELLING CST OF GD LIQU < $797.90* 175691 04/21/97 04/21/97 $31.82 $2.12 BERTELSON BERTELSON BROS. INC. Office supplies 4407220 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 4913 04/21/97 $2.19 BERTELSON BROS. BROS. INC. INC. Desk planner -parks Clips 4407221 4409160 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 4913 04/21/97 $8.82 BERTELSON BROS. INC. Office supplies /shop 4417180 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL MAINT GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLI SUPPLI 4917 04/21/97 04/21/97 $21.13 $29.24 BERTELSON BERTELSON BROS. INC. Office supplies 4417140 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 5041 504.1 04/21/97 $104.44 BERTELSON BROS. BROS. INC. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 4433600 YORK SELLING GENERAL SUPPLI 5461 04/21/97 $344.11 BERTELSON BROS. INC. Steel files 4433600 4439110 CENT SVC GENER FIRE GENERAL SUPPLI 5461 04/21/97 $23.38 BERTELSON BROS. INC. Stamp S42326 DEPT. GEN-GENERAL CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI SUPPLI 5300 04/21/97 04/21/97 $213.23 $8.48 BERTELSON BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 4447070 POLICE DEPT. G OFFICE SUPPLIE 5380 04/21/97 $13.61 BERTELSON BROS. BROS. INC. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES Stacking trays 4447120 FINANCE ' GENERAL SUPPLI 5387 04/21/97 $9.16 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 4450710 4447121 ADMINISTRATION CENT GENERAL SUPPLI 04/21/97 04/21/97 $2.64 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 4457220 SVC GENER CENT SVC GENER GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLI SUPPLI 5609 5609 04/21/97 $5.28 $8.82 BERTELSON BERTELSON BROS. BROS. INC. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 4460040 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI 5609 < *> $828.47* GENERAL SUPPLIES 4461030 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 175692 < *> 04/21/97 $95.32 $95.32* BEST LOCKING SYSTEMS OF Keys 46276 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 5029 . 175693 < *> 04/21/97 $5,779.53 $5,779.53* BFI OF MN INC Refuse 033197 50TH STREET RU PROF SERVICES 175694 04/21/97 $42,082.89 'BFI RECYCLING SYS recycling service 040197 RECYCLING Recycling Char < *> $42,082.89* i 175695 04/21/97 175696 04/21/97 175697 04/21/97 175698 04/21/97 175699 04/21/97 175700 04/21/97 175701 04/21/97 175702 04/21/97 04/21/97 $70.00 $70.00* $60.00 $60.00* $108.40 $108.40* Bjorgo, Todd Refund one.soccer gam 040897 GOLF PROG DOME RENTAL Black, Archie ACO General supplies 041197 ANIMAL CONTROL GENERAL SUPPLI Blaylock Cancel job 97007780 GENERAL FD -PRO PLUMBING PERMI $16.05 BLEDSOE, SARA Art work sold $16.05* $100.00 BLOOD, DAVID Police services $100.00* $103.55 Bloomington Htg Duplicate permit $103.55* $75.00 BRAEMAR -CITY OF LAKES FS Advertising $75.00* $63.21 BRANDESS - KALT -AETNA GROU GENERAL SUPPLIES $338.91 BRANDESS -KALT -AETNA GROU COST OF GOODS SOLD $402.12* 041497 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER APRIL 19 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES 040297 GENERAL -FD PRO MECHAN PERMITS 040997 PARK ADMIN. PROF SERVICES 5359 611115 MEDIA LAB GENERAL SUPPLI 4660 618389 ART SUPPLY GIF COST OF GD SOL 5187 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, APR 16, 1997, 8:47 PM page i CHECK NO DATE ------------------------------------------------------ CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION ---------- INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 175703 04/21/97 04/21/97 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 Brauer & Associates Ltd Brauer - - - - -- --------------------------------------------- Arch /L.A. services 1200483 PK BOND CIP PROF SERVICES ------------ 04/21/97 $2,000.00 & Associates Ltd Brauer & Associates Ltd Arch /L.A. services Arch /L.A. service 1200483 PKBOND CIP PROF SERVICES *> 04/21/97 $3,000.00 Brauer & Associates Ltd Arch /lake cornelia 1200483 1200488 PKBOND CIP PKBOND CIP PROF SERVICES PROF SERVICES < $9,000.00* 175704 < > 04/21/97 $35.00 $35.00* Briese, Roger Over pay refund s bat 040797 EDINA ATHLETIC REGISTRATION F 175705 04/21/97 04/21/97 $229.55 $31.06 BRISSMAN- KENNEDY INC BRISSMAN- KENNEDY CLEANING SUPPLIES 458704 CITY HALL GENE CLEANING SUPPL 5119 < *> $260.61* INC Solid Big D 4587041 CITY HALL GENE CLEANING'SUPPL 5119 175706 < *> 04/21/97 $730.00 $730.00* BROADCAST MUSIC INC Broadcast music 040197 ED ADMINISTRAT DUES & SUBSCRI 175707 < *> 04/21/97 $4,179.00 $4,179.00* Brock White Sealant 93396101 GENERAL MAINT ROAD OIL 175708 < *> 04/21/97 $100.00 $100.00* BUTLER, GEORGE Police services .APRIL 19 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES 175709 < *> 04/21/97 $1,009.54 $1,009.54* CALLAWAY GOLF . COST OF GOODS - PRO S 683019 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 3934 175710 *> 04/21/97 $50.00 CANTON, JANET MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 041497 FINANCE MILEAGE < $5.0.00* 175711 04/21/97 04/21/97• $101.55 $485.70 CATCO CATCO Drag link 333515 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5005 04/21/97 $488.03 CATCO Fittings Slack adjuster 333873 ' 267300 EQUI,PMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS. 5010 < *> $1,075.28* EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5240 175712 < *> 04/21/97 $90.53 $90.53* CD PRODUCTS INC Signs 23761 STREET NAME SI SIGNS & POSTS 5039 175713 < *> 04%21/97 $37.24 $37.24* CDP IMAGING SYSTEMS Copies 02521536 SUPERV. & OVRH LIC & PERMITS 5258 175714 *> 04/21/97 $80.00 Change Funds -Steve Graus Change fund 040997 LIQUOR 50TH ST CASH OVER AND < $80.00* 175715 04/21/97 04/21/97 $361:20 $653.80 CHAPIN CONSTRUCTION BULL.Commodities CHAPIN.CONSTRUCTION bid ad CPCOSO86 ADMINISTRATION ADVERT PERSONL < *> $1,015.00* BULL Misc ads CPC05114 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LE 175716 < *> 04/21/97 $282.75 CHARLES SAKMANN GOLF INC COST OF GOODS - PRO S 034549 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 4123 - $282.75* 175717 04/21/97 04/21/97 $470.58 $356.70 CHEM CONCEPTS CHEM CONCEPTS Stair Bulbs 1394 CLUB HOUSE REPAIR PARTS 5142 < *> $827.28* 60231 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 5677 175718 < *> 04/21/97 $313.00 $313.00* Chem -Sol Inc TS 60 5841 EQUIPMENT OPER LUBRICANTS 5034 COUNC. AECK REGISTER WED, APR 16, 1997, 8:47 PM page CHECK NO DATE- -------------------------------------- CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR--------- -- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION - - - - - INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 175719 *> 04/21/97 $104.85 Chrysler Motors -- - ------------------------ Service manual 041097 ---- - -------------- EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI ---------- < $104.85* 175720 04/21/97 04/21/97 $286.01 CIT GROUP /COMMERCIAL SER COST OF GOODS - PRO S 25794 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 4817 *> $877.84 CIT GROUP /COMMERCIAL SER COST OF GOODS - PRO S 63540 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR < $1,163.85* 175721 < *> 04/21/97 $420.00 $420.00* CITY OF EDINA Pgrounds petty cash 040297 PLAYGROUND & T GENERAL SUPPLI 175722 *> 04/21/97 $541.77 CITY OF RICHFIELD LIGHT & POWER 033197 GENERAL STORM LIGHT & POWER _ < $541.77 *. 175723 04/21/97 04/21/97 $25.56 $15.71 City Wide Window Service City Wide Window Service Window clean 96742 YORK OCCUPANCY CONTR REPAIRS 04/21/97 $15.71 City Wide Window Service Window clean Window 96743 VERNON OCCUPAN CONTR REPAIRS < *> $56.98* clean 96744 50TH ST OCCUPA CONTR REPAIRS 175724 *> 04/21/97 $329.74 CLEARSNAP CRAFT SUPPLIES 29256, ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES 4926 _ < $329.74* 175725 *> 04/21/97 $186.38 Commercial Furniture Bro GENERAL SUPPLIES 702217 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI 5180 < $186.38* .175726 04/21/97 04/21/97 $175:62 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS Respirator 285131 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5036 04/21/97 $29.14 $44.99 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS SAFETY EQUIPMENT Glasses 285993 PUMP. & LIFT ST SAFETY EQUIPME 4873 < *> $249.75* 286406 GENERAL MAINT SAFETY EQUIPME 5047 175727 *> 04/21/97 $140.50 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO COST OF GOODS SOLD 025435 ART SUPPLY GIF COST OF CD SOL 4475 < $140.50* 175728 04/21/97 $110.00* Cook•Incorporated Ambulane supplies 10649178 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP i 4447 175729 04/21/97 04/21/97 $372.10 $338.54 COPY EQUIPMENT INC. Mylar for ozlid 0050505 ENGINEERING GE BLUE PRINTING 5386 04/21/97 $1.19.61 COPY EQUIPMENT INC. COPY EQUIPMENT INC. Mylar for ozlid Blueline paper 0050507 ENGINEERING GE BLUE PRINTING 5386 < *> $830.25* 0050988 ENGINEERING GE BLUE PRINTING 5546 175730 *> 04/21/97 $1,386.67 CRIMMINS MD, TIMOTHY J Medical services APRIL 19 FIRE DEPT. GEN PROF SERVICES < $1,386.67* 175731 04/21/97 04/21/97 $555.34 CROSS CREEK APPAREL INC COST OF GOODS - PRO S 934259 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR < *> $1,115.51 $1,670.85* CROSS CREEK APPAREL INC COST OF GOODS - PRO S 935309 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 3589 175732 *> 04/21/97 $160.70 CROSSTOWN CAMERA CLUB Donations 0414.97 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < $160.70* 175733 *> 04/21/97 $30.50 CULLIGAN -METRO Soft water service 033197 LABORATORY CONTR SERVICES < $30.50* 175734 04/21/97 04/21/97 $23.55 $20.24 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO. REPAIR PARTS 087094 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 5158 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO. REPAIR PARTS 08693100 MAINT OF.COURS REPAIR PARTS 4961 I COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, APR 16, 1997, 8:47 PM page b CHECK NO DATE - ------ ---------- --------------- CHECK AMOUNT ---------- VENDOR ------ ---- -------- DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 175734 04/21/97 04/21/97 $12.87 $9,891.72 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO. CUSHMAN MOTOR ------ ------ - REPAIR PARTS - - - -- --------------------------------------------------- 08709400 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS ___ 5158 < *> $9,948.38* CO. Turf truckster 087023 EQUIPMENTP REPL EQUIP REPLACEM 4882 175735 < *> 04/21/97 $53.00 $53.00* D.C. ANNIS SEWER INC Plumbing maint 2697 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONTR REPAIRS 4949 175736 < *> 04/21/97 $181.91 $181.91* D.C. HEY CO. EQUIPMENT RENTAL 818149 ART CENTER ADM EQUIP RENTAL 175737 < *> 04/21/97 $92.68 $92.68* DANIEL SMITH INC COST OF GOODS SOLD 7510686 ART SUPPLY GIF COST OF GD SOL 5184 175738 *> 04/21/97 $185.08 DAVE'S DAIRY DELIVERY COST OF GOODS SOLD 033197 GRILL COST OF GD SOL < $185.08* 175739 04/21/97 04/21/97. $977.70. $1,284.60 DAY DIST DAY DIST COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 033197/V VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 04/21/97 $1,316.00 DAY DIST COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 5518. 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 04/21/97 - $10.00 DAY DIST COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 5586 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 04/21/97 $799.85 DAY DIST COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 5586. VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE' 04/21/97 $20.20 DAY DIST COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 5587 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 04/21/97 $2,558.30 DAY DIST COST OF GOODS COST SOLD BE 5588 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 04/21/97 $1,042.75, DAY DIST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS SOLD SOLD BE BE 6140 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 04/21/97 $1,677.90` DAY DIST COST OF GOODS ., SOLD BE 6004 6005 YORK SELLING 50TH ST CST OF GDS BEE 04/21/97 04/21/97 $950.00 DAY DIST COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 6130 SELLIN VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE CST OF GDS BEE 04/21/97 $20.20 $68.60 DAY DIST DAY DIST COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 6132 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE < *> $10,706.10* COST OF GOODS'SOLD MI 6141 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 175740 < *> 04/21/97 $211.48 $211.48* DEALER AUTOMOTIVE SERVIC Parts for sweeper 104294 EQUIP MENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5419 175741 *> 04/21/97 $107.96 DENNYS 5th AV BAKERY COST OF GOODS SOLD 0331,97 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 3951 < $107.96* 175742 *> 04/21/97 $660.00 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAF TELETYPE SERVICE P07MN027 POLICE DEPT. G TELETYPE SERVI < $660.00* 175743 < *> 04/21/97 $242.64 $242.64* Devant LTD COST OF GOODS - PRO S 073195 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 4533 1757.44 *> 04/21/97 $308.48 DON BETZEN GOLF CO COST OF GOODS - PRO S 5310. PRO SHOP COST. OF GDS -PR 1163 < $308.48* 175745 < *> 04/21/97 $37,885.35 $37,885.35* E -Z -GO TEXTRON New golf care & trade 0335884 GOLF PROG MACH. & EQUIP 3343 175747 04/21/97 04/21/97 $392.08 $364.95 EAGLE WINE EAGLE COST OF- .GOODS SOLD WI 28040 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/21/97 $448.55 WINE EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 34360 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/21/97 $77.50 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 34367 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/21/97 $635.57 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 34368 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 04/21/97 $442.15 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 34373 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 04/21/97 $644.88 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 34510 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 34520 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE COUNCI IECK REGISTER WED, APR 16, 1997, 8:47 PM page CHECK NO - - - - - -- DATE -------------------------------------------------------------- CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 175747 04/21/97 04/21/97 $87.50 $442.00 EAGLE WINE EAGLE COST OF GOODS -------------------------------- SOLD WI 35710 YORK SELLING ------------- CST OF-GD-WINE ----------- 04/21/97 $428.03 WINE EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 37202 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/21/97 $413.50 EAGLE WINE COST COST OF GOODS OF SOLD BE 37208 VERNON SELLING CST OF.GDS BEE 04/21/97 $258.56 EAGLE WINE COST GOODS OF GOODS SOLD SOLD WI WI 37210 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 04/21/97 $94.50 EAGLE WINE- COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 37216 37217 50TH ST SELLIN YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/21/97 04/21/97 $524.35 -$8.45 EAGLE WINE EAGLE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 37225 YORK SELLING CST CST OF GD WINE OF GD WINE 04/21/97 - $82.09 WINE EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 61906. VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $5,163.58* COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 62070 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 175748 < *> 04/21/97 $3,440.00 $3,440.00* EARL F. ANDERSON Receptacles & benches 153925 MAINT OF COURS SHARED MAINT 1012 175749 04/21/97 04/21/97 $11.70 $2,200.85 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE EAST COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 131658 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 04/21/97 $4,357.60 SIDE BEVERAGE EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 131658 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 04/21/97 $109.40 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST COST OF GOODS OF SOLD BE 131661 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 04/21/97 $4,198.10 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST GOODS OF GOODS SOLD SOLD MI BE 131662 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 04/21/97 $5,476.35 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 131663 134454 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 04/21/97 $1,736.30 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 134455 YORK SELLING 50TH CST OF GDS BEE 04/21/97 $97.70 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 134455 ST SELLIN 50TH ST CST OF GDS BEE 04/21/97 $1,093.30 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 134456 SELLIN VERNON SELLING CST CST OF GDS MIX OF < > $19;,281.30* GDS BEE 175750 < *> 04/21/97 .$176.00 $176.00* Eaton, Lisa PROFESSIONAL SERVICES O41097BB POLICE DEPT. G PROF SERVICES 175751 04/21/97 04/21/97 $116.94 $99.15 ECOLAB PEST ELIMINATION ECOLAB Pest control 4650746 ED BUILDING & SVC i CONTR EQUI < *> $216.09* PEST ELIMINATION Pest elimination 4650754 ED BUILDING & SVC CONTR EQUI 175752 < *> 04/21/97 $1,840.00 $1,840.00* EDIN, ROSE AC Instructor 041497 ART CENTER ADM PROF i SERVICES 175753 < *> 04/21/97 $63.59 3 $6.59* EDINA LIQUOR STORE /VERNO GENERAL SUPPLIES 042197 ART SUPPLY GIF GENERAL SUPPLI 175754 < *> 04/21/97 $301.70 $301.70* EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAIN E -83 tank repair 10791 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONTR REPAIRS 5314 175755 < *> 04/21/97 / $11.00 $11.00* Engler, Mollie Class refund 040897 ART CNTR PROG REGISTRATION F 175756 < *> 04/21/97 $253.68 $253.68* ENVIROMATIC CORPORATION Cleaning hoods 63828 CLUB HOUSE SAFETY EQUIPME 5458 175757 < *> 04/21/97 $17.95 Epilepsy Foundation of M Seizure first aid vid 1200 ADAPTIVE RECRE BOOKS & PAMPHL 5112 $17.95* 175758 < *> 04/21/97 $1,336.03 $1,336.03* Erickson Architects Arch services 040297 TRAINING FACIL EQUIP REPLACEM 175759 < *> 04/21/97 $445.44 $445.44* ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC. Storm grates 7996 I GENERAL STORM CASTINGS 4561 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, APR 16, 1997, 8:47 PM page CHECK NO DATE ---------------------------------------------- CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR ---------------------- DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 175760 < *' 04/21/97 $100.00 $100.00* Etcetera ------------------- Services Edinborou h g - 050197 --------------------- --- ----- ED ADMINISTRAT PRO - SVC - OTHER ------------- 175761 < > 04/21/97 $543.33 $543.33* Eull Concrete Products I Manhole supplies 4743 GENERAL STORM GENERAL SUPPLI 4987 175762 < *> 04/21/97 $159.09 $159.09* FASTSIGN Beer signs 87559 50TH ST SELLIN GENERAL SUPPLI 5402 175763 < *> 04/21/97 $18.00 $18.00* FASULO, WALTER Recertification fee E 033197 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONF & SCHOOLS 175764 > 04/21/97 $35.00 FINE, AGNES Program Edinborough 050897 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER $35.00* 175765 < *> 04/21/97 $24.95 $24.95* Fire Rescue Magazine Subscription 040797 FIRE DEPT. GEN DUES & SUBSCRI 175766 < *> 04/21/97 $137.06 $137:06* FIRE SPECIALTIES COMPANY-Ambulance supplies 2062 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 4947 175767 04/21/97 04/21/97 $43.75 $302.34 FISHER SCIENTIFIC FISHER SCIENTIFIC Lab supplies 6049369 LABORATORY GENERAL SUPPLI 4863 < *> $346.09* Lab supplies 3141651 LABORATORY GENERAL SUPPLI 5234 175768 04/21/97 04/21/97 $12.78 $71.36 FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY Lock Alarm 406074- PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS . 5045 < *> $84.14* service 407260 VERNON OCCUPAN ALARM SERVICE 175769 04/21/97 04/21/97 $382.21 $249.83 FORMS GROUP, THE FORMS PRINTING 1966 POLI,CF, DEPT. G PRINTING 04/21/97 $262.42 GROUP, THE FORMS GROUP, THE PRINTING PRINTING 1967 POLICE DEPT. G PRINTING 04/21/97 04/21/97 $366.56 FORMS GROUP, THE PRINTING 1968 1969 POLICE DEPT. G POLICE DEPT. G PRINTING PRINTING 7594 7594 < *> $271.79 $1,532.81* FORMS GROUP, THE Printing 1970 POLICE -DEPT. G PRINTING 7594 175770 < *> 04/21/97 $96.00 Francis-, Anne Class refund 040897 ART CNTR PROG REGISTRATION F $96.00* 175771 < > 04/21/97 $85.00r $85.00 *. FREEWAY RADIATOR SERVICE repair fuel tank 20414 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 5407 175772 < *> 04/21/97 $91.15 $91.15* G & K DIRECT PURCHASE Clothing 27516 EQUIPMENT OPER LAUNDRY 175773 04/21/97 04/21/97 $34.96 $160.80 G & K SERVICES G LAUNDRY 033197/C ED BUILDING & LAUNDRY 04/21/97 $262.71 & K SERVICES G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY LAUNDRY. 033197/P BUILDING MAINT LAUNDRY 04/21/97 $39.68 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 033197/P 033197/P ARENA BLDG /GRO PW BUILDING LAUNDRY 04/21/97 04/21/97 $209.70 $112.95 G.& K SERVICES G LAUNDRY 033197/P CITY HALL GENE LAUNDRY LAUNDRY 04/21/97 $467.22 - & K SERVICES G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY LAUNDRY 033197/P PUMP & LIFT ST LAUNDRY 04/21/97 $629.59 G & K SERVICES LAUNDRY 033197/P 033197/P EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL LAUNDRY * < > $1,917.61* MAINT LAUNDRY COUNC_ .BECK REGISTER WED, APR 16, 1997, 8:47 PM page CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT------ - - - - -- VENDOR--------- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM - - - -- -- -- --- -- - - - - - - --- - - - - -- -------------------------------------------------------- 175.774 04/21/97 $477.34 GEAR FOR SPORTS COST OF GOODS - PRO S 345074 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 3928 04/21/97 $1,322.73 GEAR FOR SPORTS COST OF GOODS - PRO S 346648 PRO SHOP < *> $1,800.07* COST OF GDS -PR 3928 175775 04/21/97 175776 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 175777 04/21/97 04/21/97 < *> 175778 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 175779 04/21/97 175780 04/21/97 04%21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 175781 175782 175783 175785 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 $299.60 $299.60* $126.00 $120.00 $45.00 $1,477.70 $1,768.70* $70.00 $70.00 $140.00* $99.36 $209.74 $72.78 $76.78 $458:66* $15,006.50 $15,006,50* $227.00 $391.00 $59.00 $199.00 $129.00 $1,005.00* $185.00 $185.00* $6,174.00 $5,656.00 $4,000.00 $15,830.00* $70.00 $70.00* $1,094.14 $161.25 $2,283.33 $202.89 $1,098.49 $70.80 $1,019.54 $1,761.74 $136.30 $28.84 $314.30 GIRARD'S BUSINESS MACHIN Forms processing 18038 GOLFCRAFT Pro supplies 9797 GOLFCRAFT Pro supplies 9802 GOLFCRAFT COST OF GOODS - PRO S 9803 GOLFCRAFT Parts 9827 GOPHER CASH REGISTER GOPHER CASH REGISTER GRAINGER GRAINGER GRAINGER GRAINGER Granite City Roofing GRAPE BEGINNINGS,INC GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC GRAPE•BEGINNINGS INC GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC Great Golf Show, The GREUPNER, JOE GREUPNER, JOE GREUPNER, JOE Griak, Seth GRIGGS COOPER & CO. GRIGGS COOPER & CO. GRIGGS COOPER & CO. GRIGGS COOPER & CO. GRIGGS COOPER & CO. GRIGGS COOPER & CO. GRIGGS COOPER & CO. GRIGGS COOPER & CO. GRIGGS COOPER & CO. GRIGGS COOPER & CO. GRIGGS COOPER & CO. Repair register 16079 Register repair 16090 GENERAL(BILLIN PROF SERVICES PRO SHOP GENERAL SUPPLI 3936 PRO SHOP GENERAL SUPPLI 3936 PRO SHOP COST OF- GDS -PR 3936 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 3936 GOLF DOME CONTR REPAIRS 5378 RANGE GENERAL SUPPLI 5378 Filler plate 97321527 CITY HALL GENE REPAIR PARTS 4708 Step ladder 28089842 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 5043 Remote control switch 49573199 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 4902 Step ladder -shop 49574022 CITY HALL GENE REPAIR PARTS 5043 Re -roof filter plant 13736 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 14393 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 14394 COST OF GOODS.SOLD WI 14458 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 14459 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 14460 Rental chip shot chal 0403.97 Basic lessons 0414 Intermediate lessons 0414 Monthly retainer 041497 Refund one soccer gam 040897 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 34362 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 34365 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 34366 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 34370 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 34372 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 34512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 34513 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 34516 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI -34517 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 34518 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 3451.9 BUILDINGS CONTR REPAIRS 2460 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE YORK.SELLING CST OF GD WINE GOLF FROG MEN'S CLUB 5372 GOLF ADMINISTR PRO SVC - GOLF GOLF ADMINISTR PRO SVC - GOLF GOLF ADMINISTR PRO SVC - GOLF GOLF PROG DOME RENTAL VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU YORK SELLING- CST OF GDS MIX YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU COUNCIL CHECK KEGISTER WED, APR 16, 1997, 8:47 PM page 1 c CHECK NO DATE -- ---------- --------------- CHECK AMOUNT --------- VENDOR. ------- -- - - - - -- -- DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 175785 04/21/97 04/21/97 $1,716.69 $174.56 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. GRIGGS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 37203 _ VERNON- SELLING CST _ _ __________ OF GD LIQU 04/21/97 $2,680.09 COOPER & CO. GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 37206 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 04/21/97 $1,944.89 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD COST LI 37207 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 04/21/97 $240.38 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD LI LI 37211 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 04/21/97 $35.40 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 37213 37219 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 04/21/97 $2,717.26 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 37220 YORK SELLING' YORK CST OF GD LIQU 04/21/97 04/21/97 $3,097.98 $227.43 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. GRIGGS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 37223 SELLING YORK SELLING CST CST OF GD WINE OF GD LIQU < *> $21,006.30* COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 38395 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 175786 < *> 04/21/97 $494.05 $494•.05* GRUBERS POWER EQUIPMENT Chain saw replacement 6300 EQUIPMENT REPL EQUIP REPLACEM 5054 175787 < *> 04/21/97 $350.00 $350.00* Hansen, June Art work sold 041497 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER 175788 < *> 04/21/97 $403.20 $403.20* HARMON FULL SERVICE GROU.Mirror 2290 ED BUILDING'& GENERAL SUPPLI 4848 175789 < *> 04/21/97 $112.14 $112.14* HEDGES, DIANA CRAFT SUPPLIES 041497 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES i< *> - 04/21/97 $89.00 . $89.00 Helm Inc Shop manual 040297 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 175791 < *> 04/21/97 $384.00 $384.00* HENDERSON, SCOTT Part time maint art c•041497 ART CENTER BLD PROF SERVICES - 175792 < *> 04/21/97 $19.50 $19.50* HENNEPIN COUNTY RECORDER Filing fee 031197 GENERAL FD PRO PROF SERVICES 175793 04/21/97 04/21/97 $408.09 $400.29 HJ GLOVE OF AMERICA HJ COST OF GOODS - PRO S LSO40197 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 1168 < *> $808.38* GLOVE OF AMERICA COST OF GOODS - PRO S LSO4197K PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 1168 175794 < *> 04/21/97 $100.00 $100.00* HOFFMAN, WILLIAM Police services APRIL 19 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES 175795 04/21/97 04/21/97 $52.65 $99.60 HOME JUICE HOME JUICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 78539 VERNON SELLING I CST OF GDS MIX < *> $152.25* COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 79306. VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 175796 < *> 04/21/97 $1,134.00 $1,134.00* HOPKINS COMMUNITY EDUCAT CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 1318 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS I 175797 < *> 04/21/97 $149.57 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL Chlorine, Acid, D.E. 11823 ED BUILDING & CHEMICALS 5431 $149.57* 175798 04/21/97 04/21/97 $1,112.34 $674.88 HOT SOX CO HOT SOX CO COST OF GOODS - PRO S 1292657 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 3926 04/21/97 $184.22 HOT SOX CO COST OF GOODS - PRO COST OF GOODS PRO S 1292742 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 3926 < *> $1,971.44* - S 1293661 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 3926 175799 04/21/97 $60.00 HTE USER'S GROUP DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 040797 POLICE DEPT. G DUES & SUBSCRI COUNC. .4ECK REGISTER WED, APR 16,, 1997, 8:47 PM page 1 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT--- VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM ---- ---------- ------- --- ------------------------------------------------------------------ OBJECT PO NUM < *> $60.00* 175800 04/21/97 04/21/97 $57.60 $58.27 HUEBSCH HUEBSCH Towels, rage 287201 ED BUILDING & SVC CONTR EQUI * <> $115.87* Towels, Rugs 291561 ED BUILDING SVC CONTR EQUI 175801 < *> 04/21/97 $60.00 $60.00* HUMPHREY, CAROLE AC-Instructor 041497 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES 175802 < *> 04/21/97 $440.91 $440.91* HYDRAULIC COMPONENT SERV Disconnect couplers 12472 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5198 175803 < *> 04/21/97 $84..22 $84.22* IKON CAPITAL EQUIPMENT RENTAL 37195406 ART CENTER ADM EQUIP RENTAL 176804 < > 04/21/97 $274.19 $274.19* ISIA Skating patches 057443 ED BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 175805 < *? 04/21/97 $86.53 $86.53* ITASCA GREENHOUSE INC Forestry supplies 97263 TREES & MAINTE GENERAL SUPPLI 4750 175806 04/21/97 04/21/97 $8,765.98 $13,376.46 J PATRICK MOORE LAMASTER J PATRICK MOORE Printing 13371 COMMUNICATIONS MAG /NEWSLET EX 04/21/97 $4,242.04 LAMASTER J PATRICK MOORE LAMASTER Agency service ADVERTISING OTHER 13372 COMMUNICATIONS MAG /NEWSLET EX 04/21/97 $198.73 J PATRICK MOORE LAMASTER Ad copy charge 13385 13386 GOLF DOME 50TH ADVERT OTHER 04/21/97 04/21/97 $198.75 $198.75 J PATRICK MOORE LAMASTER J Ad copy charge 13386 ST SELLIN YORK SELLING ADVERT OTHER ADVERT OTHER < *> $26,980.73* PATRICK MOORE LAMASTER Ad copy charge 13386 VERNON SELLING ADVERT OTHER 175807 04/21/97 04/21/97 $52.65 $107.33 J.H. LARSON ELECTRICAL C J.N. LARSON ELECTRICAL Carp shop repair 141278 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 4861 04/21/97 $139.66 C J.H. LARSON ELECTRICAL C Carpenter shop Supplies carp shop 141279 143721 PW $UILDING REPAIR PARTS 4861 04/21/97 $27.69 J.H. LARSON ELECTRICAL C Carp .shop 145558 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 04/21/97 04/21/97 $160.70 $49.15 J.H—LARSON-ELECTRICAL C J.H. Carp shop 148461 PW BUILDING PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS 4867 4874 j < *> $537.18* LARSON ELECTRICAL C Tape measure 178903 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 5030 175808 < *> 04/21/97 $837.00 $837.00* J.S. Stewart Companies I Replace curb box COE971 DISTRIBUTION CONTR REPAIRS 5502 175809 < *> 04/21/97 $100.00 $100.00* JAMES, WILLIAM F Police services APRIL 19 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES 175810 04/21/97 04/21/97 $113.82 $277.53 JERRY'S PRINTING JERRY'S PRINTING PRINTING 9738 INVESTIGATION PRINTING < * > $391.35* PRINTING 9824 POLICE DEPT. G PRINTING 5366 i 175811 < *> 04/21/97 $212 -.49 $212.49* JIM HATCH SALES Toole 7475 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 4993 175812 < *> 04/21/97 $123.64 $123.64* Johnson Wholesale Florio Fertilizer 63297 ED BUILDING &, FERTILIZER 5111 175814 04/21/97 04/21/97 - $54.,30 -$4.56 JOHNSON WINE CO. JOHNSON COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 27298 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 27300 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU COUNCIL CHECK xEGISTER WED, APR 16, 1997, 8:47 PM page 1: CHECK NO DATE -- --------- ----- CHECK AMOUNT ----- --- - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- VENDOR ---------------------------------------------------- DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 175814 04/21/97 04/21/97 - $345.09 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 28058 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 04/21/97 -$5.76 $77.80 JOHNSON WINE CO. JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 28145 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 04/21/97 $1,174.04 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD WI LI 688024 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/21/97 $1,337.14 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 688025 688026 50TH ST SELLIN 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 04/21/97 04/21/97 $5,327.43 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 688027 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE CST OF GD LIQU 04/21/97 $3,814.46 $3,667.78 JOHNSON WINE CO. JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 688028 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/21/97 $1,200.79, .JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD LI WI 688029 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 04/21/97 $1,616.01 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 688030. 691007 VERNON SELLING 50TH ST CST OF GD WINE ' 04/21/97 $822:35 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 691008 SELLIN 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU CST OF GD WINE 04/21/97 04/21/97 $3,231.00 $2,739.72 JOHNSON WINE CO. JOHNSON "CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 691009 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 04/21/97 $2,570.12 WINE JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 691010 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/21/97 $1,302.17 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF LI 691011 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU < *> $28,471.10* GOODS SOLD WI 691012 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 175815 < *> 04/21/97 $35.94 JOHNSON, NAOMI CRAFT SUPPLIES 041497 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES $35.94* 175816 04/21/97 04/21/97 $38.14 $182.43 JOHNSON, NAOMI JOHNSON, GENERAL SUPPLIES 041497 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI 04/21/97 $12.00 NAOMI JOHNSON, NAOMI CRAFT SUPPLIES 041497 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES < *> $232.57* Art work sold 041497 ART CNTR FROG SALES OTHER 175817 *> 04/21/97 $150.00 Johnson, Pamela Refund variance appli 040297 GENERAL FD PRO PLANNING FEES < $150.00* 175818 *> 04/21/97 $100.00 JOHNSON, WALTER Police service APRIL 19 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES < $100:00* 175819 < *> 04/21/97 $998.13 $998.13* Jones Sports Co Inc COST OF GOODS - PRO S 255244 PRO SHOP -COST OF GDS -PR 3932 175820 04/21/97 04/21/97 $170.00 $204.00 JORDAN BEVERAGE JORDAN COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 36261 VERNON SELLING CST OF.GDS BEE 04/21/97 $50.00 BEVERAGE JORDAN BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 36418` YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE < *> $424.00* COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 36453 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 175821 04/21/97. 04/21/97 $74,75 $1,033.89 JP FOODSERVICES INC JP CLEANING SUPPLIES 033197 GRILL CLEANING SUPPL 04/21/97 $261.88 FOODSERVICES INC JP FOODSERVICES COST OF GOODS SOLD 033197 GRILL COST OF GD SOL < *> $1,370.52* INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 033197 GRILL GENERAL SUPPLI 175822 *> 04/21/97 $31.47 JPM STORE FIXTURE & DISP Display pro merch 303279 PRO SHOP ADVERT OTHER 5371 < $31.47* 175823 04/21/97 04/21/97 $26.69 $453.01 JUSTUS LUMBER JUSTUS Plywood 56060 ED BUILDING & PAINT 4805 04/21/97 $445.77 LUMBER JUSTUS LUMBER Lumber Lumber for sign 56263 56693 ED BUILDING & PAINT 4745 04/21/97 $15.69 JUSTUS LUMBER parts Lumber & saw blade 56891 BUILDING MAINT BUILDING MAINT LUMBER 4869 LUMBER- 04/21/97 04/21/97 $128.82 $260.54 JUSTUS LUMBER JUSTUS LUMBER Lumber 57960 ED BUILDING & 4892 PAINT 5031 < *> $1,330.52* Lumber 58911 SNOW & ICE REM GENERAL SUPPLI 5083 COUNC. IECK REGISTER WED, APR 16, 1997, 8:47 PM page 1 CHECK NO DATE - - - -- ------------------------------------------- CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR -------------------------------------------------------------- DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 175824 04/21/97 04/21/97 $65.18 $65.18 KANE SERVICE, THE KANE SERVICE, THE 3/22 aims 3/15 aims 7794064 ED BUILDING-&,-PROF-SERVICES ----------- < *> $130.36* 7794063 ED BUILDING & PROF SERVICES 1`5825 04/21/97 $232.77* KAR PRODUCTS Shop fasteners 130355 MAINT,OF COURS GENERAL SUPPLI 5321 175826 < *> 04/21/97 $32.00 $32.00* Karasov, Danielle Class refund 040297 ART CNTR PROG REGISTRATION F 175827 < *> 04/21/97 $7.80 $7.80* KARSTEN MANUFACTURING CO COST OF GOODS - PRO S 3064305 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 1160 175828 < *> 04/21/97 $118.18 $118.18* 'KEPRIOS, JOHN Reimbursement Vet ser.041497 MAINT OF COURS PROF SERVICES 175829 < *> 04/21/97 $2,450.00 $2,450.00* KINGHORN, ROBERT C Sign 041197 NORMAN. MAINT. GENERAL SUPPLI 5126 175830 < *> 04/21/97 $140.00 $140.00* Kleider,. Barry AC Instructor 041497 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES 175831 04./21/97 04/21/97 $107.69 $77.28 KNOX COMM CREDIT Material for carp sho 257553 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 4872 04/21/97 $64.67 -KNOX COMM KNOX COMM CREDIT CREDIT material for carp sho Supplies for Liquor 257832 258088 CITY HALL GENE GENERAL SUPPLI.4884 04/21/97 04/21/97 $7.85 KNOX COMM CREDIT s Hardware /liquor store 258276 50TH ST OCCUPA VERNON OCCUPAN GENERAL SUPPLI GENERAL SUPPLI 4898 4907 04/21/97 $70.23 $55.67. KNOX COMM KNOX COMM CREDIT CREDIT Misc bldg supplies Misc 258580 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 4910 04/21/97 $17.64 KNOX COMM CREDIT hardware Misc bldg materials 259483 259533 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 5053 04/21/97 04/21/97 $8.88 KNOX COMM CREDIT Lumber 259760 BUILDING MAINT BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI LUMBER 5057 5060 04/21/97 $27.49 - $174.59 KNOX COMM KNOX COMM CREDIT CREDIT Misc hardware Door & shelving retur 260901 157048. BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 5239 *> 04/21/97 $183.49 KNOX COMM CREDIT Misc bldg supplies 50TH ST OCCUPA BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 4611 < $446.30* .261535 GENERAL SUPPLI 5266 175832 04/21/97 04/21/97 $1,000.00 $300.00 KPMG PEAT KPMG PEAT MARWICK MARWICK PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 16650248 CDBG PROF SERVICES 04/21/97 $300.00 KPMG PEAT MARWICK PROFESSIONAL SERV - A PROFESSIONAL SERV - A 16650248 16650248 ART CENTER ADM' PRO SVC AUDIT 04/21/97 04/21/97 $1,400.00 $1,100.00 KPMG PEAT KPMG MARWICK PROFESSIONAL SERV - A 16650248 POOL ADMIN GOLF ADMINISTR.PRO PRO SVC AUDIT SVC AUDIT 04/21/97 $300.00 PEAT KPMG PEAT MARWICK MARWICK PROFESSIONAL SERV -.A 16650248 ARENA ADMINIST PRO SVC AUDIT 04/21/97 $1,300.00 KPMG PEAT MARWICK PROFESSIONAL SERV - A PROFESSIONAL SERV 16650248 GUN RANGE ADMI PRO SVC AUDIT 04/21/97 $1,900.00 KPMG PEAT MARWICK - A PROFESSIONAL SERV - A.16650248 16650248 ED- ADMINISTRAT LIQUOR 50TH ST PRO SVC AUDIT 04/21/97 04/21/97 $1,900.00 $1,900.00 KPMG PEAT KPMG MARWICK PROFESSIONAL SERV - A 16650248 LIQUOR YORK GE PRO SVC AUDIT PRO SVC AUDIT 04/21/97 $1,200.00 PEAT KPMG PEAT MARWICK MARWICK PROFESSIONAL SERV - A PROFESSIONAL 16650248 VERNON LIQUOR PRO SVC AUDIT < *> $12,6.00.00* SERV - A 16650248 IBR #2 PROG PRO SVC AUDIT 175833 < *> 04/21/97 $74.55 $74.55* Kreative Acrylics Credit card stands 18762 50TH ST SELLIN GENERAL SUPPLI 5622 175834 04/21/97 04/21/97 $276.90 $146.44 iKREMER SPRING KREMER SPRING & ALIGNMEN S pring • 72835 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR i PARTS 4064 < *> $423.34* & ALIGNMEN U bolts 72853 EQUIPMENT OPER i REPAIR PARTS 4065 j COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, APR 16, 1997, 8:47 PM page 1 CHECK NO DATE ------------------------------------------------_--------------------------- CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 175835 04/21/97 04/21/97. - $14.00 $1,590.30 KUETHER DIST. CO. KUETHER ------------------------------------------------------ COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 179633. YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 04/21/97 $1,573.05 DIST. CO. KUETHER DIST. CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 180511 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 04/21/97 $681.00 ­,KUETHER DIST. CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD BE COST OF 180592 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 04/21/97 $2,937.60 KUETHER DIST. CO. GOODS SOLD BE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 181049 181060 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE < *> $6,767.95* YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 175836 <*> 04/21/97 $200.00 $200.00* L &S Hospitality & Servic ADVERTISING OTHER 5398 GOLF DOME ADVERT OTHER 5374 175837. *> 04/21/97 $1,930.32 LADY FAIRWAY COST OF GOODS - PRO S 53260 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 4535 < $1,930.32* 175838 *> 04/21/97 $62.50 LAKELAND FLORIST Pro display 204060 PRO SHOP ADVERT OTHER 5454 < $62.50* 175839 < *> 04/21/97 $1,618.33 $1,618.33* LaVan Floor Covering Com Install carpet 31485 CLUB HOUSE GENERAL SUPPLI 4057 175840 < *> 04/21/97 $35.00 $35.00* LaVercombe, Richard Overpay return S.Ball 040797 EDINA ATHLETIC REGISTRATION F 175841 04/21/97 04/21/97 $38.46 $396.84, LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. LAWSON PRODUCTS Drive anchor - electric 1648794 ST LIGHTING OR GENERAL SUPPLI 4900 04/21/97 $461.48 INC._ LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. Hardware Nuts & Bolts 1649366 STREET NAME SI GENERAL SUPPLI 4899 < *> $896.78* 1658445 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 5340 175842 04/21/97 04/21/97 $44.18 LEEF BROS. INC. Office furnishing 375201 ART CENTER BLD CST OF GD LIQU < *> $38.36 $82.54* LEEF BROS. INC. LAUNDRY 033197/G MAINT OF COURS LAUNDRY 175843 *> 04/21/97 $163.81 LEHMANN FARMS COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 65017. YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < $163.81* 175844 *> 04/21/97 $151. -41 LINEAR DYNAMICS INC Hose ends 137839 STREET NAME SI GENERAL SUPPLI 4379 < $151.41* 175845 < > 04/21/97 $75.00 $75.00* Lloyd, Judy Adaptive rec supplies 040897 ADAPTIVE RECRE GENERAL SUPPLI 175846 *> 04/21/97 $175.90 LONG LAKE TRACTOR & EQUI Pin 226834 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 4778 < $175.90* 175847 04/21/97 04/21/97 $471.33 $82.31 M M & R INC. M M COST OF GOODS - PRO S 120024 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 1157 < *> $553.64* & R INC. COST OF GOODS - PRO S 120025 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 1157 175848 < > 04/21/97 $1,520.00 $1,520.00* M.R.P.A. Team registration 033197 EDINA ATHLETIC PROF SERVICES 175849 < *> 04/21/97 $255.00 $255.00* MAAO 4 summer seminars 042197 ASSESSING CONF & SCHOOLS 175850 *> 04/21/97 $119.84 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. Rod 29703395 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS < $119.84* COUNCi IECK REGISTER WED, APR 16, 1997, 8:47 PM 175859 04/21/97 < *> ED BUILDING & 175860 04/21/97 4323 04/21/97 MENARDS 04/21/97 #30240251 #30240251 04/21/97 page 1 CHECK NO ------------------------------------ DATE CHECK AMOUNT ------------------------------------------- VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 175851 04/21/97 $523.00 MARGROM SKOGLUND WIE IM COST OF GOODS SOLD ----------------=------------------------------ WI 2404 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE #30240251 #30240251 04/21/97 04/21/97 $1,274.00 MARGROM SKOGLUND WINE IM COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 2405 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE $860.00 MARGROM SKOGLUND WINE IM COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 2406 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD < *> $2,657.00* WINE 175853 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 175854 04/21/97 175855 04/21/97 175856 04/21/97 175857 04/21/97 175858 04/21/97 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC 175859 04/21/97 < *> ED BUILDING & 175860 04/21/97 4323 04/21/97 MENARDS 04/21/97 #30240251 #30240251 04/21/97 SUPPLIES 04/21/97 GOLF DOME 04/21/97 SUPPLI 4160 175861 04/21/97 $1,707.15 $1,115.70 -$6.25 - $18.50 $419:65 $30.20 $1,033.25 $174.50 $1,923.36 $1,635.40 $61.30 $13.25 $679.80 $10.00 $3,693.17 $73.90 $35.25 $159.00 $720.95 $1,370.60 $51.00 $14,882.68* MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII 'SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES $122.63_ MATHISON CO, THE $122.63* COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 627537 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 627538 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 679 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 683 COST -OF GOODS SOLD BE 629645 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 629646 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 629652 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE•629715 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 529883 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 629881 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 629882 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 629884 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 629916 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 629917 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 629933 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 629934 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 629935 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 630397 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 631899 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 632105 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 632107 COST OF GOODS SOLD 687930 $28,705.80 Matrix Communications In EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 27666 $28,705.80* $100.00 MCCORMICK, CAROL $100.00* $281:51 MCNEILUS STEEL $281.51* $500.00 Medical Priority $500.00* 50TH ST'SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS•BEE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE ART SUPPLY GIF COST OF GD SOL CENT SVC GENER EQUIP REPLACEM Performance 050897_ ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER Rebar /tube 117036 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 4992 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 22219 $149,059.00 Meisinger Construction C Aquatic Center Constr 5 $149,059.00* POLICE'DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS PKBOND CIP EQUIP REPLACEM $21.47 $31.36 MENARDS MENARDS ACCT #30240251 GENERAL SUPPLIES 19898 GOLF DOME GENERAL SUPPLI 4323 $134.29 MENARDS ACCT " ACCT #30240251 #30240251 GENERAL Parts SUPPLIES 19653 GOLF DOME GENERAL SUPPLI 4160 $126.74 MENARDS ACCT #30240251 Sump pump for gun 20577 ran 20729 GOLF DOME BUILDING MAINT REPAIR GENERAL PARTS SUPPLI 5156 5646 $13.78 $7.86 MENARDS MENARDS ACCT ACCT #30240251 #30240251 GENERAL SUPPLIES 20878 MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPLI 5540 $335:50* GENERAL SUPPLIES 8247456 MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPLI 5540 $74.42 MENARDS Sanders 15772 'ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 5363 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, APR 16, 1997, 8:47 PM page It CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT ----------------------------- VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM < *> $74.42* ----------------- - -- - -- 175862 *> 04/21/97 $100.00 MERFELD, BURT Police services APRIL 19'RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES < $100.00* 175863 04/21/97 04/21/97 $477.65 $461.73 MERIT SUPPLY MERIT SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 44888 ED BUILDING & CLEANING SUPPL 5298 < *> $939.38* Misc cleaning supplie 44994 ED BUILDING & CLEANING SUPPL 5603 175864 04/21/97 04/21/97 $80.20 $168.55 MESSERLI & KRAMER MESSERLI & KRAMER Collect fees 032597 GENERAL FD PRO AMBULANCE FEES < *> $248.75* Collect fees 47266 GENERAL FD PRO AMBULANCE FEES 175865 04/21/97 04/21/97 $210.76 $42.55 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY METRO Soccer nets 18312 FIELD MAINTENA GENERAL SUPPLI 5075 04/21/97 $50.69 ATHLETIC SUPPLY METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY Field marking paint Tennis 18347 FIELD MAINTENA GENERAL SUPPLI 5233 04/21/97 $88.71 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY net straps Tennis net strap 18412 18413 PATHS & HARD S PATHS & HARD S GENERAL SUPPLI GENERAL SUPPLI 5487 5480 < *> 04/21/97 $136.05 $528.76* METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY Line marking paint 18509 FIELD MAINTENA LINE MARK POWD 5267 175866 04/21/97 $6,599.81 Metro Cash Register Syst Cash registers 39524 GOLF PROG CIP. 4846 < *> $6,599.81* 175867 *> 04/21/97 $60.00.- METRO CHIEF FIRE OFFICER Dues- Paulfranz 040397 FIRE DEPT. GEN DUES & SUBSCRI < $60.00* 175868 *> 04/21/97 $216.87 MID - AMERICA POWER DRIVES Cable 120183 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 4919 < $216.87* 175869 04/21/97 04/21/97 $113.00 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 09469155 50Tq $T SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 04/21/97 $139.65 $94.20 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI COST OF GOODS SOLD MI- 09479303 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 04/21/97 $114.15 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI COST OF GOODS SOLD MI COST OF 09528307 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS.MIX < *> $461.00* GOODS SOLD MI 09538579 YORK SELLING. CST OF GDS MIX 175870 *> 04/21/97 $55.20 MILWAUKEE ELECTRIC TOOL Tools 97072071 GENERAL MAINT TOOLS 4871 < $55.20* 175871 *> 04/21/97 '$324.21 MINN COMM PAGING Quarterly paging 040197 ED BUILDING & SVC CONTR EQUI < $324.21* 175872 < *> 04/21/97 $1,891.92 $1,891.92* MINNCOR CENTRAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 23749, EQUIPMENT REPL EQUIP REPLACEM 4381 175873 04/21/97 04/21/97 $1,266.00 $1,232.90 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN S MINNEAPOLIS -& Replace.sewer line 31049 DISTRIBUTION CONTR REPAIRS 5071 04/21/97 $900.00 SUBURBAN S MINNEAPOLIS SUBURBAN S Replace service line Repalce service line 31050 31051 DISTRIBUTION CONTR REPAIRS 5072 04/21/97 $639.00 .& MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN S Replace service line 31057 DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION CONTR REPAIRS CONTR REPAIRS 5073 5488 04/21/97 $360.00 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN S Repair stop box 31058 DISTRIBUTION CONTR REPAIRS 5489 < *> $4,397.90* 175874 04/21/97 $8,212.32 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPA Water purchased '041097 DISTRIBUTION WATER PURCHASE < *> $8,212.32* 175875 04/21/97 $36.98 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPA COST OF GOODS SOLD R1039703 'CLUB HOUSE COST OF GD SOL 3961 COUNCI IECK REGISTER WED, APR 16, 1997, 8:47 PM CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM page ] ---------------------------------------------------------- OBJECT PO NUM *> $36.98* ---------------------------------------- 175877 04/21/97 $1,234.39 MINNEGASCO HEAT 04/21/97 $705.56 MINNEGASCO HEAT 041497 FIRE DEPT. GEN HEAT 04/21/97 $7,199.26 ,_ MINNEGASCO HEAT 041497 . CITY HALL GENE HEAT 04/21/97 $2,160.12 MINNEGASCO HEAT 041497 PW BUILDING HEAT 04/21/97 $393.30 MINNEGASCO HEAT 041497 BUILDING MAINT HEAT 04/21/97 $912.33 MINNEGASCO HEAT 041497 ART CENTER BLD HEAT 04/21/97 $302.27 MINNEGASCO HEAT 041497 CLUB HOUSE HEAT 04/21/97 $7,737.11 MINNEGASCO HEAT 041497 MAINT'OF COURS HEAT 04/21/97 $54.20.. MINNEGASCO HEAT 041497 GOLF DOME HEAT 04/21/97 - $3,715.52 MINNEGASCO HEAT 041497 NORMANDALE GC HEAT 04/21/97 $3,332.64 MINNEGASCO HEAT 041497 ARENA- BLDG /GRO HEAT 04/21/97 $736.53 MINNEGASCO HEAT 041497 ED BUILDING & HEAT 04/21/97 $3,477.21 MINNEGASCO HEAT 041497 PUMP & LIFT ST HEAT 04/21/97 $109.63 MINNEGASCO HEAT 041497 DISTRIBUTION HEAT 04/21/97 $188.24 MINNEGASCO HEAT 041497 50TH ST OCCUPA HEAT 04/21/97 $192.27 MINNEGASCO HEAT 041497 YORK OCCUPANCY HEAT *> $25,019.54* 041497 VERNON OCCUPAN NEAT 175878 > 04/21/97 $160.96 $160.96* Minnesota Air Structure Inflation system repa 237 GOLF DOME REPAIR PARTS 5373 175879 <*> 04/21/97 $400.00 $400.00* ,Pinnesota Business & Opp ADVERTISING OTHER 7022 ED ADMINISTRAT ADVERT OTHER 4 -970 175880 *> 04/21/97 $147:00 $147.00* MINNESOTA CHIEFS OF POLI Cont Ed- Police 040797 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS 175881 > 04/21/97 $15.00 $15.00* MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF Forestry-Meeting 040897 TREES & MAINTE CONF & SCHOOLS 5486 175882 04/21/97 04/21/97 $143.78 $132.16 MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPME MINNESOTA PIPE Stand pipe. 50010 DISTRIBUTION REPAIR PARTS 5033 04/21/97 $483.51 & EQUIPME MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPME Stand pipe gaskets Curb box risers & lid 50169 DISTRIBUTION REPAIR PARTS 5244 <*> $759.45* 50511 DISTRIBUTION REPAIR PARTS 5250 175883 <*> 04/21/97 $165.00 $165.00* MINNESOTA SAFETY COUNCIL CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 063069 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS 4612 175884 04/21/97 04/21/97 $63.00 $112.80 MINNESOTA SUN PUBLICATIO MINNESOTA ad for bid 000877 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LE 04/21/97 $117.60 SUN PUBLICATIO MINNESOTA SUN PUBLICATIO Ad for bids Ad for bids 000878 ADMINISTRATION 'ADVERTISING LE 04/21/97 $204.00 MINNESOTA SUN PUBLICATIO Grandview T/F hrg 0008791 00.0880 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LE 04/21/97 $20.40 MINNESOTA SUN PUBLICATIO P hrg planning 000881 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LE 04/21/97 $63.00 MINNESOTA SUN PUBLICATIO Ad for bid ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LE 04/21/97 04/21/97 $25.20 $33.60 MINNESOTA SUN PUBLICATIO ADVERTISING•LEGAL 002081 002082 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LE ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LE <*> $639.60* MINNESOTA SUN PUBLICATIO P.H. Notice 002083 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LE 175885 ' *> 04/21/97 $41.33 $41.33* MODERN OFFICE repair arts p p 70537 GRILL CONTR REPAIRS 3326 175886 04/21/97 04/21/97 $87.84 $37.95 MOORE MEDICAL MOORE MEDICAL Ambulance supplies 9032179 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 5306 Ambulance supplies 9032207 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 5307 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, APR 16, 1997, 8:47 PM page lE CHECK NO DATE -------- CHECK AMOUNT------ - - - - -- - - - - -- VENDOR--------- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM < > $125.79* - - - - -- -------.-------------------- 175888 04/21/97 04/21/97 $220.57 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO Fountain repair I137286 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 3160 04/21/97 $98.63 $165.27 MTI DISTRIBUTING MTI DISTRIBUTING CO CO Fountain repair I139749 MAINT OF COORS REPAIR PARTS 3750 04/21/97 $56.03 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS I141791 I145447 MAINT OF COURS MAINT REPAIR PARTS 4322 04/21/97 $37.02. MTI DISTRIBUTING CO REPAIR PARTS I145493 OF COURS ED BUILDING & REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS 5150 5195 04/21/97 04/21/97 $82.26 $11.46 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO REPAIR PARTS I146198 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 5323 04/21/97 $8.64 MTI DISTRIBUTING MTI DISTRIBUTING CO CO REPAIR PARTS Bumper I146622 I147363 MAINT.OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 5323 04/21/97 $192.79 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO Toro parts I146822 ED BUILDING & ED BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 5676 04/21/97 04/21/97 $57.29 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO REPAIR PARTS I147141 & MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPLI REPAIR PARTS 5403 5327 04/21/97 $170.80 $93.21 MTI DISTRIBUTING MTI DISTRIBUTING CO REPAIR PARTS I147204 ED'BUILDING &' REPAIR PARTS 5676 04/21/97 $93.85 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO CO Tires REPAIR PARTS I147205 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 5435 < *> $1,287.82* I147914 ED BUILDING & REPAIR PARTS 5613 175889 *> 04/21/97 $380.00 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO MTI Meeting S4372 ED ADMINISTRAT CONF & SCHOOLS 4347 < $380.00* 175890 *> 04/21/97 $143.07 MUNICILITE CO Lites 8597 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5084 < $143.07* 175891 < > 04/21/97 $22.95 'NhCA ACO Training guide 041197 ANIMAL CONTROL GENERAL - SUPPLI $22.95. 175892 04/21/97 $45.62 Napa Auto Parts Sealers beams 368273 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS. 5484 < *> $45.62* 175893 *> 04/21/97 $5.86 National Hygiene Product Dome supplies 001100 GOLS DOME GENERAL SUPPLI 5370 < $5.86* 175894 04/21/97 $45.00 NCITE Training seminar 041497 TRAINING CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $45.00* 175895 *> 04/21/97 $250.28 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGN Signs 2063769 STREET NAME SI SIGNS & POSTS 4546 < $250.28* 175896 *> 04/21/97 $79.17 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS IN Radio repair 35197. EQUIPMENT OPER RADIO SERVICE 9553 < $79.17* 175897 *> 04/21/97 $100.00 NISSEN, DICK Police services APRIL 19 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES < $100.00* 175898 04/21/97 04/21/97 $76.22 $25.62 NORMED; NORMED Ambulance supplies 09666214 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 4445 * <> $101.84* Ambulance supplies 09666215 .FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 5309 175899 04/21/97 04/21/97 $1.15 $1.75 NORTH STAR TURF NORTH REPAIR PARTS 140744 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 4799 04/21/97 $127.67 STAR TURF NORTH STAR TURF REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS 140829 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 4799 04/21/97 $25.18_ NORTH STAR TURF REPAIR PARTS 140850 141062 MATNT OF COUPS MAINT OF REPAIR PARTS 5157 04/21/97 $361.13 NORTH STAR TURF REPAIR PARTS 141340 COUPS MAINT OF COORS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS 5157 5326 04/21/97 04/21/97 $51.12 $189.30 NORTH STAR TURF NORTH STAR TURF REPAIR PARTS 141389 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 5326 Course supplies 141396 MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPLI 5534 COUNCI .ECK REGISTER WED, APR 16, 1997; 8:47 PM page CHECK NO DATE ------------------------------ CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR --------- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION -------------------------------------------------------- INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM <*> $757.30* 175900 04/21/97 04/21/97 $128.13 NORTHERN HYDRAULICS Spring /Hitch 47971704 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 4916 < *> $39.06 $167.19* NORTHERN HYDRAULICS Spring 47987535 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5042 175901 < *> 04/21/97 $116.42 $116.42* NORTHERN Shop supplies 82308491 MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPLI 5535 175902 04/21/97 04/21/97 $65.10 $74.40 NORTHSTAR ICE NORTHSTAR COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 18588 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 04/21/97 $46.50 ICE NORTHSTAR ICE COST COST OF OF GOODS SOLD MI GOODS SOLD MI 18589 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $186.00* 18590 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 175903 *> 04/21/97 $239.13 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY COST OF GOODS SOLD 252361 ART SUPPLY GIF COST OF GD SOL 4930 < $239.13* 175904 04/21/97 04/21/97 $274.24 $226.21 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO NORTHWESTERN Floor dry NW36431 SUPERV. & OVRH HAZ. WASTE DIS 4723 04/21/97 $192.25 TIRE CO NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES Junk & tires TUBES NW36435 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES 4723 < *> $692.70* NW36452 SUPERV. & OVRH CST OF GDS MIX 4723 175905 *> 04/21/97 $488.41 NOVAK'S GARAGE Repairs to groundsmas D5243 ED BUILDING & CONTR REPAIRS 5385 < $488.41* , 175908 04/21/97 04/21/97 $3.14 $8.76 NSP NSP LIGHT & POWER 041497 GENERAL MAINT LIGHT & POWER 04/21/97 $5,688.80 NSP LIGHT LIGHT & & POWER POWER 041497 ST LIGHTING OR LIGHT & POWER 04/21/97 $7.71 NSP LIGHT & POWER 041497 041497 TRAFFIC SIGNAL GENERAL STORM LIGHT LIGHT & & POWER POWER 04/21/97 04/21/97 $158.20 $873.68 NSP NSP LIGHT & POWER 041497 PONDS & LAKES LIGHT & POWER 04/21/97 $1,091.17 NSP LIGHT LIGHT & & POWER POWER 041497 PARKING RAMP LIGHT & POWER 04/21/97 $32.68 NSP LIGHT & POWER 041497 041497 FIRE DEPT. GEN YORK FIRE STAT LIGHT LIGHT & & POWER POWER 04/21/97 04/21/97 $11.94 $1,410.76 NSP NSP LIGHT & POWER 041497 CIVIL DEFENSE 'LIGHT & POWER 04/21/97 $1,039.59 NSP LIGHT LIGHT & & POWER POWER 041497 CITY HALL GENE LIGHT & POWER 04/21/97 $726.34 NSP LIGHT & POWER 041497 041497 PW BUILDING ART CENTER BLD LIGHT LIGHT & & POWER POWER 04/21/97 04/21/97 $6,222.07 $1,596.95 NSP NSP LIGHT & POWER 041497 BUILDING MAINT LIGHT & POWER 04/21/97 $7.33 NSP LIGHT & POWER 041497 CLUB HOUSE LIGHT & POWER 04/21/97 $13.59 NSP LIGHT & POWER 041497 MAINT OF COURS LIGHT & POWER 04/21/97 $8,088.88 NSP LIGHT LIGHT & & POWER POWER 041497 POOL OPERATION LIGHT & POWER 04/21/97 $1,079.55 NSP LIGHT & POWER 041497 041497 ARENA BLDG /GRO GUN RANGE LIGHT LIGHT & POWER 04/21/97 04/21/97 $1,533.37 $18,097.16 NSP NSP LIGHT & POWER 041497 PUMP & LIFT ST LIGHT & & POWER POWER 04/21/97 $43.22 NSP LIGHT LIGHT & & POWER POWER 041497 DISTRIBUTION LIGHT & POWER 04/21/97 $820.81 NSP LIGHT & POWER 041497 041497 TANKS TOWERS & 50TH ST OCCUPA LIGHT LIGHT & & POWER POWER 04/21/97 04/21/97 $559.99 $1,068.77 NSP NSP LIGHT & POWER 041497 VERNON OCCUPAN LIGHT & POWER 04/21/97 $6,441.30 NSP LIGHT LIGHT & & POWER POWER 041497 GOLF DOME LIGHT & POWER < *> $56,625.76* 041497 ED BUILDING & LIGHT & POWER 175909 < *> 04/21/97 $119.37 $119.37* NSP Repair street lite wi 25278 DISTRIBUTION CONTR REPAIRS 5470 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, APR 16, 1997, 8:47 PM page 2 CHECK NO DATE --------------------------------------------------------------------------- CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 175910 < *> 04/21/97 $30.83 $30.83* OFFICE MAX INC Batteries-planner ----------------------------------------------------- 4983 ED ADMINISTRAT GENERAL SUPPLI 5607 175911 < *> 04/21/97 $488.84 $488.84* OFFSET PRINTING GENERAL SUPPLIES 33688 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI 175912 < *> 04/21/97 $237.00 $237.00* OLSON, MIKE Beer lines 040797 GRILL CST OF GDS BEE 3963 175913 < *> 04/21/97 $84.40 $84.40* OSWALD HOSE & ADAPTERS Flooding hose repair 20598 SKATING RINK M CONTR REPAIRS 5276 175914 < *> 04/21/97 $42.00 OTIS SPUNKMEYER-INC COST OF GOODS SOLD 8163044 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 3967 $42.00* 175915 < *> 04/21/97 $96.41 Overnite Transportation Shipping chgs for gar 176658 LITTER REMOVAL GENERAL SUPPLI 5640 $96.41* 175916 04/21/97 04/21/97 $553.82 $85.30 OWENS SERVICE CO OWENS SERVICE CO Heater repairs 10895 ED BUILDING & CONTR REPAIRS 5626 * <> $639.12* Mcquay service 11102 ED BUILDING & PROF SERVICES 175917 04/21/97 04/21/97 $339.59 $38.A4 PAGING NETWORK OF MINNES PAGING NETWORK EQUIPMENT RENTAL 06410738 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP RENTAL < *> $377.63* OF MINNES TELEPHONE 06410751 INSPECTIONS TELEPHONE 175918 < *> 04/21/97 $277.81 $277.81* PAPER DEPOT CRAFT SUPPLIES 3847 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES 5188 175919 < *> 04/21/97 $953.62 $953.62* PAPERDIRECT INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 30837175 SPECIAL ACTIVI GENERAL SUPPLI 5401 175920 < *> 04/21/97 $1,771.05 $1,771.05* PARTS PLUS REPAIR PARTS 032697 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 17 *921 < > 04/21/97 $950.00 $950.00* PATTIWORKS INC Brochure design 1109 ED ADMINISTRAT PROF SERVICES 175922 04/21/97 04/21/97 $557.40 $230.80 PAUSTIS & SONS PAUSTIS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 74353 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/21/97 $641.15 & SONS PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 74830 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/21/97 $530.15 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD WI WI 75040 75041 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 04/21/97 $1,009.35 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 75042 VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE CST OF 04/21/97 04/21/97 $1,093.30 $1,012.35 PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 75310 50TH ST SELLIN GD WINE CST OF GD WINE 04/21/97 $338.00 PAUSTIS & SONS PAUSTIS & SONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 75311 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $5,412.50* COST OF GOODS. SOLD WI 75347 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 175923 04/21/97 04/21/97 $175.45 $122.00 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD 033197 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 04/21/97 $87.25 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY PEPSI -COLA COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 29032691 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $384.70* COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 30281060 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 175926 04/21/97 04/21/97 $215.96 $215.96 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 273531 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 273533 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU COUNCI IECK REGISTER WED, APR 16, 1997, 8:47 PM page 2 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM --------------------------------------- -------------- - - - OBJECT p0 NUM 175926 04/21/97 04/21/97 $215.96 - $10.06 PHILLIPS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS - -- COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 273535 _ VERN014 SELLING _ CST _ OF _ _ ------ - - - - -- GD LIQU 04/21/97 -$9.85 PHILLIPS WINE & WINE & SPIRITS SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 13931 YORK SELLING CST OF GD, LIQU 04/21/97 $866.83 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF COST OF GOODS GOODS SOLD WI 13932 - VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/21/97 $547.60 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD SOLD WI WI 274884 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 04/21/97 $1,266.50 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 274885 274886 YORK SELLING ' CST OF GD WINE 04/21/97 $235.34 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 275408 VERNON SELLING YORK CST OF GD WINE 04/21/97 $96.90 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 275798 SELLING 50TH ST CST OF GD WINE 04/21/97 $125.85 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 275902 SELLIN 50TH ST CST OF GDS BEE 04/21/97 04/21/97 $592.65 $898.35 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 275903 SELLIN 50TH ST SELLIN CST CST OF OF GD LIQU GD WINE 04/21/97 $1,153.75 PHILLIPS PHILLIPS WINE & WINE & SPIRITS SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 275904 YORK SELLING CST OF.GD LIQU 04/21/97 $567.15 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF COST.OF GOODS GOODS SOLD WI 275905 YORK SELLING CST OF GD-WINE 04/21/97 $1,198.25 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD SOLD LI WI 275906 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 04/21/97 $218.95 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 275907 276790 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/21/97 $444.00 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 276791 50TH ST SELLIN YORK CST OF GD WINE 04/21/97 04/21/97 $1,185.80 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 276792 SELLING VERNON SELLING CST CST OF OF GD WINE GD WINE 04/21/97 $214.70, $134.80 PHILLIPS PHILLIPS WINE & WINE SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 277762 50TH ST'SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 04/21/97 $513.00 PHILLIPS & WINE & SPIRITS SPIRITS COST OF COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 277763 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE' 04/21/97 $1,536.60 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS GOODS SOLD SOLD WI WI 277764 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 04/21'/97 $1,154.85. PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 277765 277766 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/21/97 $398.28 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 277862- VERNON SELLING 50TH CST OF GD WINE 04/21/97 $124.45 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 277863 ST SELLIN 50TH ST CST OF GD LIQU 04/21/97 $1,050.60 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 277864 SELLIN YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/21/97 04/21/97 $72.00 $393.45 PHILLIPS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 277865 YORK SELLING CST CST OF OF GD LIQU GD WINE 04/21/97 $90.83 PHILLIPS-WINE WINE -& &- SPIRITS SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 277866 VERNON.SELLING _CST OF GD LIQU < *> $15,709.45* COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 277867 VERNON. SELLING CST OF GD WINE 175927 < *> 04/21/97 $562:98 $562.98* PHYSIO CONTROL SERVICE CONTRACTS -EQU IV1190 91 POLICE DEPT G : SVC CONTR EQUI 7650 175928 04/21/97 04/21/97 $302.15 $522.50 PINNACLE PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 963471 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 04/21/97 $219.25 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 963472 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $1,043.90* COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 963474 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX j 175929 04/21/97 04/21/97 $468.31 $163.51 PIP PRINTING PIP PRINTING PRINTING 3845 ED ADMINISTRAT I PRINTING 5382 < *> $631.82* Customer cards- p rinti 3847 ED'ADMINISTRAT PRINTING 5352 175930 < > 04/21/97 $294.60 $294.60* Plant Health Care Inc Forestry supplies 001792 TREES & MAINTE GENERAL SUPPLI 4897 175931 < *> 04/21/97 $35.36 $35.36* PLUNKETTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 519711 ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL I SUPPLI 175932 04/21/97 04/21/97 $706.37 $401.38 POLO RALPH LAUREN L.P. POLO COST OF GOODS - PRO 5.527835 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 1156 04/21/97 $183.90 RALPH LAUREN L.P. POLO RALPH LAUREN L.P. COST OF GOODS COST - PRO S 527837 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 1156 04/21/97 $115.00 POLO RALPH LAUREN L.P. OF GOODS COST OF GOODS -- PRO - PRO S 527839 S 527843. PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 1156 04/21/97 $416.26 POLO RALPH LAUREN L.P. COST OF GOODS - PRO S 527844 PRO SHOP COST PRO SHOP OF GDS -PR 1156 *> 04/21/97 $50.16 POLO RALPH LAUREN L.P. COST OF GOODS - PRO S 527845 COST PRO SHOP OF GDS -PR 1156 < $1,873.01* COST OF GDS -PR COUNCIL CHECK xEGISTER WED, APR 16, 1997, 8:47 PM 175936 04/21/97 175937 04/21/97 04/21/97 175938 04/21/97 175939 04/21/97 175941 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 175942 04/21/97 175943 04/21/97 175944 04/21/97 175945 04/21/97 175946 04/21/97 11 $3,000.00 POSTMASTER $3,000.00* $2,714.95 PRECISION LANDSCAPE $319.50 PRECISION LANDSCAPE $3,034.45* $496.29 PRINT SHOP, THE $496.29* $62.00 $62.00* $776.31 $470.38. $51.94, $353.56 $821.63 $587.15 $1,234.94 $102.49 $52.95 $206.00 $116.06 $768.31 $51.50 $232.12 $489.08 $528.20 $1,030.86 $200.00 $8,073.52* $123.16 $123.16* $270.00 $270.00* PRINTERS SERVICE INC PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR ,WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PUMP & SPRAY EQUIPMENT QUALITY FLOW SYSTEMS .$67.53 Quast Transfer Inc $67.53* $212.63 QUIK PRINT $212.63* $185.84- R &R SPECIALTIES INC Postage permit #939 040897 CENT SVC GENER POSTAGE Tree trimming 040797 TREE TRIMMING PROF SERVICES Stump grinding 041097 TREES & MAINTE page 2 CHECK NO --------- DATE --------------- CHECK AMOUNT - - - - -- VENDOR -- - - DESCRIPTION - - -- - INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 175933 04/21/97 $64.00 POSTMASTER - - - -- ----------------------------- Mailing Art Center 041497 ----------------------------------- CENT SVC GENER POSTAGE < *> $64.00* 175934 *> 04/21/97 $5,000.00 POSTMASTER Postage 040997 CENT SVC GENER POSTAGE < $5,000.00* 175935 04/21/97 $875.00 POSTMASTER Bulk Mailing art cen 041497 CENT SVC GENER POSTAGE < > $875.00* 175936 04/21/97 175937 04/21/97 04/21/97 175938 04/21/97 175939 04/21/97 175941 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 175942 04/21/97 175943 04/21/97 175944 04/21/97 175945 04/21/97 175946 04/21/97 11 $3,000.00 POSTMASTER $3,000.00* $2,714.95 PRECISION LANDSCAPE $319.50 PRECISION LANDSCAPE $3,034.45* $496.29 PRINT SHOP, THE $496.29* $62.00 $62.00* $776.31 $470.38. $51.94, $353.56 $821.63 $587.15 $1,234.94 $102.49 $52.95 $206.00 $116.06 $768.31 $51.50 $232.12 $489.08 $528.20 $1,030.86 $200.00 $8,073.52* $123.16 $123.16* $270.00 $270.00* PRINTERS SERVICE INC PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR ,WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PUMP & SPRAY EQUIPMENT QUALITY FLOW SYSTEMS .$67.53 Quast Transfer Inc $67.53* $212.63 QUIK PRINT $212.63* $185.84- R &R SPECIALTIES INC Postage permit #939 040897 CENT SVC GENER POSTAGE Tree trimming 040797 TREE TRIMMING PROF SERVICES Stump grinding 041097 TREES & MAINTE CONTR REPAIRS 5639 printing of newslette 29793 SENIOR CITIZEN GENERAL SUPPLI 5102 Sharpen blades 138382 ED BUILDING & SVC CONTR EQUI 5608 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 34361, COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 34363' COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 34364. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 34369 COST OF GOODS SOLD`WI 34371 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 34511 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 34514 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 34515. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 35711 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 37200 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 37201 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 37204 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 37205 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 37209 COST.OF GOODS SOLD WI 37212 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 37218 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 37221 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 38396 Repair agitator 13832 Repair 3610 Freight Charge 596473 PRINTING 66652 Repair 5225 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON.SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE STREET NAME SI PROF SERVICES. - 4579 LIFT STATION M CONTR REPAIRS 5080 FIELD MAINTENA GENERAL SUPPLI 5638 ARENA ADMINIST PRINTING 5364 ARENA BLDG /GRO CONTR REPAIRS COUNCI (ECK REGISTER WED, APR 16, 1997, 8:47 PM page 2 CHECK NO DATE --------- CHECK AMOUNT - - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- VENDOR ----- - - - - -- ---------------------------- DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM < *> $185.84* ------------------------------------------ 175947 04/21/97 04/21/97 $556.76 $179.60 R.E. Fritz Inc R.E. Fritz Inc COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 393878 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX. 04/21/97 $305.32 R.E. Fritz Inc COST COST OF GOODS OF GOODS SOLD SOLD MI MI 394445 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 04/21/97 $359.20 R.E. Fritz Inc COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 394863 395210 VERNON SELLING CST VERNON OF GDS MIX *> 04/21/97 $179.60 R.E. Fritz Inc COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 395431 SELLING CST 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX < $1,580.48* OF GDS MIX 5948 1`* 04/21/97 $36.30 $36.30 * RDO EQUIPMENT CO Parts 70670 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5002 175949 < *> 04/21/97 $495.23 $495. Renaissance Fertilizers Fertilizer 1082 GENERAL TURF C FERTILIZER 5074 -23* 175950 < *> 04/21/97 $88.50 $88.50* RIVIERA FINANCE COST OF GOODS - PRO S 65955 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 1154 175952 04/21/97 04/21/97 $178.74 $557.03 RLWW Company L.P., RLWW The COST OF GOODS - PRO S 051738 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 04/21/97 $308.94 Company L.P., RLWW Company L.P., The The COST OF GOODS OF - PRO S 051784 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 04/21/97 $262.02 RLWW Company L.P., The -COST COST GOODS OF GOODS -'PRO - PRO S S 0581728 0581729 PRO SHOP PRO COST OF GDS -PR 04/21/97 $680.24 RLWW Company L.P., The COST OF GOODS - PRO S 0581758 SHOP PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 04/21/97 04/21/97 $624.55 $209.•08 .4LWW Company L.P., The COST OF GOODS - PRO S 0581780 PRO SHOP COST COST OF OF.GDS GDS -PR -PR 04/21/97 $713.58 RLWW Company L.P., RLWW Company L.P., The The COST COST OF GOODS - OF PRO S 0581783 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 1156 04/21/97 .$220.94 RLWW Company L.P., The COST GOODS - OF GOODS - PRO PRO S S 0581788 0581949 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 04/21/97 $98.39 RLWW Company L.P., The COST OF GOODS - PRO S 0582114 PRO SHOP PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 04/21/97 04/21/97 $357.60 $178.84 RLWW Company L.P., RLWW The COST OF GOODS - PRO S 0582120 PRO SHOP COST COST OF OF GDS -PR. GDS -PR 04/21/97 $220.84 Company L.P., RLWW Company-L.P., The The COST COST OF GOODS - OF PRO S 0585245 PRO.SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 04/21/97 $178.84 RLWW Company L.P., The COST GOODS - OF GOODS - PRO PRO S S 0586322 05863656 PRO'SHOP PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR < *> 04/21/97 $112.58 $4,902.21* RLWW Company L.P., The COST OF GOODS - PRO S 0586371 PRO SHOP COST COST OF OF GDS -PR GDS -PR 4124 175953 04/21/97 04/21/97 $1,340.00 $1,590.00 RMR Services Inc RMR Services Inc Meter reading service 960088 METER READING PROF SERVICES < *> $2,930.00* Meter readers 970098 METER READING PROF SERVICES 5273 175954 04/21/97 04/21/97 $20.88 $20.75 ROSLAND, KENNETH ROSLAND, KENNETH MEETING EXPENSE 040397 ART CENTER ADM MEETING EXPENS i 04/21/97 $26.61 ROSLAND, KENNETH MEETING EXPENSE MEETING_ EXPENSE 040397 ADMINISTRATION MEETING EXPENS < *> $68.24* 040397 ADMINISTRATION MEETING EXPENS 175955 < *> 04/21/97 $128.55 $128.55* RUBBER STAMPEDE CRAFT SUPPLIES 8190400 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES 175956 < *> 04/21/97 $279.52 $279.52* RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON EQ CO Hinge,collar C04189 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 4866 175957 < *> 04/21/97 $100.00 $100.00* S.O.T.A. Cont Ed- Police 040497 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS I 175958 < *> 04/21/97 $92.92 $92..92* SAFETY KLEEN Haz waste disposal 348332 SUPERV. & OVRH HAZ. WASTE DIS I I COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, APR 16, 1997, 8:47 PM page 2 CHECK NO DATE -------------------------------------------------- CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT 17 *95 < > .9 04/21/97 $47.86 $47.86* ---------------------------------------- SAM'S CLUB DIRECT COMMER Pen's poster board 041497 -------------------------------------- GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI PO NUM 175960 < > 04/21/97 $1,877.50 $1,877.50* SANDERS WACKER WEHRMAN B Prof eng sery 96606. STREET IMPROVE CIP 17 *961 < > 04/21/97 $16.00 $16.00* Schipani, Ray Handicap refund 041197 GOLF PROG COMPUTR HANDIC 175962 < *> .04/21/97 $246.80 $246.80* SCHMITZ, THOMAS Reimbusement 040897 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONF & SCHOOLS 175963 < *> 04/21/97 $186.10 $186.10* SCHMITZER, DAVID Reimbursment 040397 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONF & SCHOOLS 17 *964 < > 04/21/97 $7.61 $7.61* SEARS Tool ID624484 GENERAL MAINT TOOLS 4700 175965 < *> 04/21/97 $3,894.70 $3,894.70* Seating & Athletic Facli Mobile bleachers 041097 EQUIPMENT REPL EQUIP'REPLACEM 4224 175966 < *> 04/21/97 $100.00 $100.00* SHEPARD, JOHN Police services APRIL 19 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES 175967 < *> 04/21/97 $53.04' $53.04* SHERWIN WILLIAMS Misc hardware 86116 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 4739 175968 < *> 04/21/97 $2,742.50 $2,742.50* SIMONE ENGINEERING INC Flow meters F362620 PUMP & LIFT ST REPAIR PARTS I 175969 < *> 04/21/97 $37.50 $37.50* Smith, Dale Class A upgrade /pk de 041197; PARK MAINTENAN LIC & PERMITS 175970 < *> 04/21/97 $83.47 $83.47* SOHNS, JOYCE A MEETING EXPENSE. 040397 ED ADMINISTRAT MEETING EXPENS 175971 04/21/97 04/21/97 $227.00 $1,804.58 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I SOUTHSIDE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 43457 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 04/21/97 $1,100.60 DISTRIBUTORS I SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 71204 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 04/21/97 $74.50 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF BE 71205 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 04/21/97 $1,234.15 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD MI BE 71206 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF'GDS MIX 04/21/97 $1,961.80 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 71306 71427 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 04/21/97 $120.50 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 71428 YORK SELLING YORK CST OF GDS BEE *> 04/21/97 $972.96 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 71429 SELLING 50TH CST OF GDS MIX i < $7,496.09* ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 175972 < *> 04/21/97 $6,621.75 $6,621.75* SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CABLE 2nd quarter 032897 COMMUNICATIONS PRO.SVC OTHER 175973 < *> 04/21/97 $163.50 $163.50* SPALDING COST OF GOODS - PRO S 50274685 PRO SHO P COST OF GDS -PR 1162 i 175974 < *> 04/21/97 $55.00 $55.00* Spartan Mech Pd twice htg license 032497 GENERAL FD PRO MECHAN PERMITS COUNC_ 4ECK REGISTER WED, APR 16, 1997, 8:47 PM page 2 CHECK NO - --- DATE ----- ---- CHECK AMOUNT------ - - -- -- - - - - -- VENDOR--------- DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 175975 04/21/97 04/21/97 $265.95 $331.90 SPS SPS - - - - -- ------------------------------ Repair work -art cente 2691436 --------------------------------- BUILDING MAINT REPAIR PARTS 4878 < *> $597.85* Parts 2702578 ED BUILDING & REPAIR PARTS 5432 175976 *> 04/21/97 $118.70 ST. CLOUD RESTAURANT SUP CLEANING SUPPLIES 356189 ARENA BLDG /GRO CLEANING SUPPL 5299 < $118.70* 175977 *> 04/21/97 $6,000.00 STANDARD & POOR'S Bond rating 76478 GENERAL FD PRO DUE FROM HRA < $6•,000.00* 175978 *> 04/21/97 $2,478.40 STAR TRIBUNE Help wanted ads 033197 CENT SVC GENER ADVERT PERSONL < $2,478.40* 175979 < *> '04/21/97 $32.00 $32.00* STATE BOARD OF ELECTRICI Electrical permit 040797 SOUTH HENNEPIN GENERAL SUPPLI 175980 < *> 04/21/97 $20.00 $20.00* STRATEGIC MORTGAGE SERVI PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 00154072 POLICE DEPT. G PROF SERVICES 175981. 04/21/97 64/21/97 $69.23 $79.82 STREICHERS STREICHERS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 822181 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP MAINT 5360 04/21/97 $78.65 STREICHERS GENERAL SUPPLIES 802752 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI 5104 < *> $227.70* AMMUNITION 834971 POLICE DEPT. G AMMUNITION 5619 175982 - 04/21/97 04/21/97 - $26.:63 $62.28 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET Credit 86357. EQUIPMENT OPER SVGS MAILING 04/21/97 $9.51 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SUBURBAN CHEVROLET' Pump Hose asm /hose 69549 69746 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5004 04/21/97 $161.35 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET Sender fuse 69966 EQUIPMENT OPER EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS 5008 5011 04/21/97 04/21/97 $203.69 $78.28 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SUBURBAN Harness 69975 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5012 04/21/97 $486.30 CHEVROLET SUBURBAN 'CHEVROLET Wheel Repair work 70245 CVCB2947 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5015 04/21/97 $55.02 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET Sensor assm 70359 EQUIPMENT OPER EQUIPMENT OPER- CONTR REPAIRS GENERAL 5006 *> 04/21/97 $78.28 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET Wheel 702471 EQUIPMENT OPER SUPPLI REPAIR PARTS 5017 5015 < $1,108.08* 175983 < *> 04/21/97 $346.85 $346.85*- SUBURBAN PROPANE Propane 416138 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 3774 175984 *> 04/21/97 $205.00 . SULLIVAN, MONICA AC Instructor 041497 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < $205.00* 175985 *> 04/21/97 $21.52 SUPERIOR FORD EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 969047 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP MAINT < $21.52* 175986 < *> 04/21/97 $100.00 $100.00* SWANSON, HAROLD_ Police services APRIL 19 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES 987 17 *> 04/21/97 .$16.00 Swenson, Glenn C. Refund handicap 040397 GOLF PROG COMPUTR HANDIC < $16.00* 175988 *> 04/21/97 $262.30 Systen Control Services Work on #6 weed chart 170 DISTRIBUTION CONTR REPAIRS 5286 < $262.30* i 175989 04/21/97 04/21/97 $4.82 $295.04 T.C. MOULDING & SUPPLY T.C. COST OF GOODS SOLD 13942 ART SUPPLY GIF COST OF GD SOL j MOULDING & SUPPLY COST OF GOODS SOLD 3095471 ART SUPPLY GIF COST OF GD SOL 4929 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, APR 16, 1997, 8:47 PM page 2 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT ---------------------------------- VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM <*> $299.86* ----------------------------------------------- 175990 < *> 04/21/97 $73.04 $73.04* TAPE DISTRIBUTORS OF MIN GENERAL SUPPLIES 71974 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI 5121 175991 < *> 04/21/97 $6.40 TELEPHONE ANSWERING CENT Answering service 031797 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI $6.40* 175992 < *> 04/21/97 $1,502.85 $1,502.85* TELEVISION EQUIPMENT ASS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 970447 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP REPLACEM 3736 175993 04/21/97 04/21/97 $115.92 $227.78 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO TERMINAL SUPPLY Amber lite 6215201 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 4301 04/21/97 $361.62 CO TERMINAL SUPPLY CO Terminals Terminals 6555402 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL.SUPPLI 4562 04/21/97 $226.63 TERMINAL SUPPLY.CO Amber lite 6983800 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 4783 < *> $931.95* 7021100 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5003 17 *994 < > 04/21/97 $66.00 $66.00 * - TESSMAN SEED INC ' Ballfield supplies S008224 FIELD MAINTENA GENERAL SUPPLI 5238 175995 < *> 04/21/97 $11,479.55 $11,479.55* THOMSEN- NYBECK Prosecutin 9 110807 LEGAL SERVICES PROF SERVICES 175996 04/21/97 04/21/97 $2,126:90,, $1,99.00:. THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP THORPE COST -OF GOODS SOLD BE 103531 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 04/2.1/97 $1,879.50 DISTRIBUTING COMP THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF ' 103937 GRILL - COST OF GD SQL 3968 0.4/21/97 $112.00 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 104001 72397 VERNON SELLING CST.OF GDS BEE < *> $4,317.40* GRILL COST-OF GD SOL 3968 175997 < > 04/21/97 $45.00 $45.00* Thobland, Lisa Refund swimming 041497 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F 175998 < *> 04/21/97 $46.04 $46.04 * - Tisdel's Garage Repair work 0015 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 5059 175999 04/21/97 04/21/97 $826.56 $1,997.41 TITLEIST TITLEIST COST OF GOODS - PRO S 0621713 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 1159 04/21/97 $143.04 TITLEIST COST OF GOODS - PRO COST OF GOODS PRO S 0622793 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 1159 04/21/97 $258.24 TITLEIST - COST OF GOODS - PRO S S 0622797 0625904 PRO SHOP PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 1159 < *> $3,225.25* COST OF GDS -PR 1159 176000 < *> 04/21/97 $226.94 $226:94* TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPL Welding supplies 109527 STREET NAME SI GENERAL SUPPLI 5046 176001 < *> 04/21/97 $623.03 $623.03* TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS I VGA Monitors 3567 LIQUOR PROG MACH. & EQUIP 4803 176002 < *> 04/21/97 $25.00 $25.00* U S TENNIS ASSOCIATION GENERAL SUPPLIES 042197 TENNIS INSTRUC GENERAL SUPPLI I I 176003 < *> 04/21/97 $242.82 $242.82* U.S. Filter /Waterpro Copper fittings 219160 DISTRIBUTION REPAIR PARTS 5069 176004. < *> 04/21/97 $36.60 $36.60* ULLRICH, CINDY MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 041497 ED ADMINISTRAT MILEAGE, COUNCI_ _HECK REGISTER WED, APR 16, 1997, 8:47 PM 4458 Ambulance supplies 0004622 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 4935 Parts 24590400 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 5049 Study material 040997 GENERAL TURF C page 2 CHECK - NO - - - - -- DATE ---- ----- CHECK AMOUNT ----- ------ - --------- --- VENDOR ------------------------------ DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 176005 04/21/97 04/21/97 $437.00 $300.00 Ultimate Ultimate Golf Golf COST OF - ------ GOODS PRO S 032482 PRO.SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 4536 < *> $737.00 *• 041497 SKATING & HOCK COST OF GOODS - PRO S 032688 PRO SHOP, COST OF.GDS -PR 4536 176006 04/21/97 04/21/97 $1,128.53 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 040897 POLICE DEPT. G UNIF ALLOW TELEPHONE 04/21/97 $5.36 $1,352.10 UNIFORMS UNIFORMS UNLIMITED UNLIMITED GENERAL SUPPLIES 040897 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $2 485 99* 041497 GUN RANGE UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 040897 RESERVE PROGRA UNIF ALLOW 176007 04/21/97 04/21/97 176008 04/21/97 176009 04/21/97 176011 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 - 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/9.7 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 176012 04/21/97 176013 04/21/97 176014 04/21/97 04/21/97 04/21/97 < *> 64/21/97 176015 04/21/97 176016 04/21/97 $111.62 UNIMED MIDWEST INC. $426.54 UNIMED MIDWEST INC. $538.16* $134.64 United Electric $134.64* $29.00 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA $29.00* $55.40 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS $4,013.09 1 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS $107.58 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS $241.23 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS $697..76 '.US WEST COMMUNICATIONS $123.59 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS $91.'59 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS $852.76 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS $62.01 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS $317.39 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS $44.06 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS $53.55 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS $112.31 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS $1,227.31 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS $232.41 jUS WEST COMMUNICATIONS $246.22 {US,WEST COMMUNICATIONS $192.69 iUS WEST COMMUNICATIONS $8,670.95* $109.27 IUS WEST COMMUNICATIONS $109.27* $75.00 USABDA -MN $75.00* $941.19 VAN PAPER CO. $261.19 VAN PAPER CO. $63.63 VAN PAPER CO.' $485.37 VAN PAPER CO. $1,751.38* $74.53 VELDE, DAVID $74.53* $40.00 Vendmark Inc $40.00* Spray bottles 0004739 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 4458 Ambulance supplies 0004622 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 4935 Parts 24590400 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 5049 Study material 040997 GENERAL TURF C GENERAL SUPPLI TELEPHONE 041497 DARE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 041497 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 041497 COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 041497 ART CENTER BLD TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 041497 SKATING & HOCK TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 041497 SENIOR CITIZEN TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 041497 BUILDING MAINT TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 041497 CLUB HOUSE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 041497 MAINT OF COURS TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 041497 ARENA BLDG /GRO TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 041497 GUN RANGE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 041497 ED BUILDING & TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 041497 PUMP & LIFT ST TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 041497 DISTRIBUTION TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 041497 50TH ST OCCUPA TELEPHONE - TELEPHONE 041497 YORK OCCUPANCY TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 041497 VERNON.00CUPAN TELEPHONE Frame relay D0860860 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE Performance 050197 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER. Paper bags 158096 YORK SELLING PAPER SUPPLIES 5116 Paper bags 158107 50TH ST SELLIN PAPER SUPPLIES 5116 Cups 158285 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 5296 Bowls, cups, paper su 159224 CITY HALL GENE PAPER SUPPLIES 5390 Cell phone battery & 041497 PUBLIC HEALTH GENERAL SUPPLI Refund /overpymt food 040997 GENERAL FD PRO FOOD & DRINK L COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER WED, APR 16, 1997, 8:47 PM page 2 CHECK NO DATE -------------------------------------------------- CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR ----- --- DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 176017 04/21/97 04/21/97 $315.24 $546.90 VESSCO VESSCO ----------- - -- - -- Valves & filter tanks 12706. ______ WATER TREATMEN GENERAL SUPPLI 5230 04/21/97 $3,940.50 VESSCO Chlorinator parts Chlorinator 12783 WATER TREATMEN REPAIR PARTS 5475 < *> $4,802.64* 12819 WATER TREATMEN REPAIR PARTS 4411. 176018 04/21/97 - 04/21/97 $19.66 VIETNAM VETERANS ORGANIZ VIETNAM ADVERTISING OTHER 033197 50TH ST SELLIN ADVERT OTHER 04/21/97 .$19.67 $19.67 VETERANS ORGANIZ ADVERTISING OTHER. VIETNAM VETERANS ORGANIZ ADVERTISING 033197 YORK SELLING ADVERT OTHER < *> $59.00* OTHER 033197 VERNON SELLING ADVERT OTHER 176019 < *> 04/21/97 $184.54 $184:54* Viewpoint International - COST OF GOODS - PRO S 9279 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 1155 176020 < *> 04/21/97 $233.70 $233.70* VIKING SAFETY PRODUCTS Safety equipment 3200 BUILDING MAINT SAFETY EQUIPME 5503 176021 04/21/97 04/21/97 $309.00 $76.00 VINTAGE ONE WINES VINTAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 137457 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/21/97 $76.00 ONE WINES VINTAGE ONE WINES COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1464 50TH ST-SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 04/21/97 $76.00 VINTAGE ONE WINES COST OF GOODS SOLD WI COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1465 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $537.00* 1466 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 176022 < *> 04/21/97 $100.00 $100.00* WALSH, WILLIAM Police services APRIL 19 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES 176023 04/21/97 • 04/21/97 $26.95 $87.76. WATERSTREET, JOAN WATERSTREET, JOAN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 041197 POLICE DEPT. G PROF SERVICES 04/21/97 $40.47 WATERSTREET, JOAN CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS MEETING EXPENSE 041197 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS 04/21/97 $76.07 WATERSTREET, JOAN MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 041197 041197 POLICE DEPT. G POLICE DEPT. G MEETING EXPENS MILEAGE. 04/21/97 04/21/97 $32.05 $57.03 WATERSTREET, JOAN WATERSTREET, JOAN EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 041197 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP MAINT 04/21/97 $74.55 WATERSTREET, JOAN DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 041197 041197 POLICE DEPT. G POLICE DEPT. DUES & SUBSCRI 04/21/97 04/21/97 $22.15 $24.00 WATERSTREET, JOAN WATERSTREET, PRISONER MEALS 041197 G POLICE DEPT. G PHOTO SUPPLIES PRISONER MEALS < *> $441.03* JOAN LICENSES & PERMITS 041197 EQUIPMENT OPER LIC & PERMITS 176024 < *> 04/21/97 $1,682.'70 $1,682.70* Wave Car Washes Inc CAR WASH 0409979 EQUIPMENT OPER CAR WASH 5349 176025 < ? 04/21/97 $1,300.22 $1,300.22* Welsh Companies Inc 96 Cam Overage 111608 YORK OCCUPANCY PROF SERVICES 176026 < *> 04/21/97 $247.18 $247.18* WEST WELD SUPPLY CO. Drill bits 4810 PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPLI 5032 176027 < *> 04/21/97 $25.77 $25.77* WHEELER HARDWARE CO Hex keyss 48301 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 5223 176028 < *> 04/21/97 $56.69 $56.69* WILLIAMS STEEL Spray paint 72771503 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL'SUPPLI 4760 176029 04/21/97 04/21/97 $429.72 $217.90 WINE COMPANY, THE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 3386 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/21/97 $1,591.15 COMPANY, THE WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI COST OF 3387 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 04/21/97 $255.50 WINE COMPANY, THE GOODS SOLD WI COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 3388 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 3389 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE COUNC HECK REGISTER WED, APR 16, 1997, 8:47 PM page 2 CHECK NO --- -- - - -- DATE - - - -- -- CHECK - AMOUNT------ - - - - -- VENDOR - -- -- ---- DESCRIPTION - - INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO'NUM 176029 04/21/97 04/21/97 $436.75 $958.50 WINE COMPANY, THE WINE -- -- - -- COST OF GOODS SOLD --- WI - - - - --------------------------------------------- 3391 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 04/21/97 $356.05 COMPANY, THE WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 363.0 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE < *> $4,245.57* COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 3631 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 17 *030 < > 04/21/97 $16.00 Wood, Michael Refund handicap 041197 GOLF PROG COMPUTR HANDIC $16.00* 176031 04/21/97 04/21/97 $897.68 $1,431.12 WORLD CLASS WINES INC WORLD COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 60387 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 04/21/97 $182.20 CLASS WINES INC WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF WI 60388 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $2,511.00* GOODS SOLD WI 60389 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 176032 < *> 04/21/97 $100.00 $100.00* WROBLESKI, HENRY Police services APRIL 19 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES 176033 < *> 04/21/97 $705.17 $705.17* XEROX CORPORATION Maint 55941066 CENT SVC GENER E UIP RENTAL Q 176034 < *> 04/21/97 $18,315.00 $18,315.00* YORKDALE SHOPPES PARTNER Adjustment Liq closin 041197 LIQUOR PROG DUE TO OTHR GO 176035 < *> 04/21/97 $3.95 $3.95 *. ZIEGLER INC • Total parts PC000158 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPpLI 3868 ,• 176036 < *> 04/21/97 $225.00 $225.00* ZINN, BOBO AC Instructor 041497 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES $824,544.81* COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY WED, APR 16, 1997, 8:48 PM page FUND ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ # 10 GENERAL FUND ------------------------------------------------- $156,715.90 FUND # 11 COMMUNITY DEVELP. BLOCK GR $1,000.00 FUND # 12 COMMUNICATIONS $28,871.77 FUND # 15 WORKING CAPITAL $13,020.51 FUND # 23 ART CENTER $8,144.64 FUND # 26 SWIMMING POOL FUND $313.59 FUND # 27 GOLF COURSE FUND $118,757.97 FUND # 28 ICE ARENA FUND $6,605.99 FUND # 29 GUN RANGE FUND $1,423.61 ' FUND # 30 EDINBOROUGH /CENTENNIAL LAK $21,631.59 FUND # 40 UTILITY FUND $67,980.29 FUND # 41 STORM SEWER UTILITY FUND $1,696.45 FUND # 42 RECYCLING PROGRAM $42,082.89 FUND # 50 LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND $195,163.11 FUND # 60 CONSTRUCTION FUND $1,877.50 FUND # 61 PARK BOND FUND $158,059.00 FUND # 66 IMP BOND REDEMPTION #2 $1,200.00 $824,544.81* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER TUE, APR 8, 1997, 6:58 PM page 1 CHECK NO ------------------------------- CHECK DT CHECK AMOUNT ---- - - - - -- VENDOR--------- DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM--- OBJECT PO NUM. 169403 03/03/97 $50.00 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT - - - - -- ------------------------ OF Well.Conference regis 030397 - - -- - PUBLIC HEALTH - - - -- ----------------------- CONF & SCHOOLS < * >' $50.00* 169404 03/03/97 $1,200.00 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF Lab Certification 2 y 030397 LABORATORY PROF SERVICES < *> $1,200.00* 169405 03/07/97 $174,000.00 CITY OF EDINA Payroll transfer 030797 LIQUOR PROG CASH 03/07/97 #, # # #, # # #. ## CITY OF EDINA Payroll transfer 030797 LIQUOR PROG CASH < *> $0.00* 169406 03/10/97 $3,599.40 POSTMASTER 1997 Valuation 031097 CENT SVC GENER POSTAGE < *> $3,599.40* .169407 03/10/97 $24,871.89 FIDELITY BANK Payroll taxes 030797 GENERAL FD PRO PAYROLL PAYABL < *> $24,871.89* 1694D8 03/21/97 $297,000.00 CITY OF EDINA Payroll transfer 032197 LIQUOR PROG CASH 03/21/97 #, # # #, # # #. ## CITY OF EDINA Payroll transfer 032197 LIQUOR PROG CASH < *> $0.00* 169409 03/24/97 $25,014.60 FIDELITY BANK Payoll taxes 032497 GENERAL FD PRO PAYROLL PAYABL < *> $25,014.60* 169410 03/17/97 $16,211.00 Brookdale Dodge Dodge Intrepid 030497 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP REPLACEM < *> $16,211.00* 169411 03/25/97 $32,680.34 PERA PERA 032197 GENERAL FD PRO P.E.R.A. PAYAB < *> $32,680.34* 169412 03/25/97 $23.37 PERA PERA 032197 GENERAL FD PRO P.E.R.A. PAYAB < *> $23.37* 174627 03/10/97 $5,598.46 LJR INC I494 COMMISSION I494/24 I -494 COMMISSI PROF SERVICES < *> $5,598.46* 174628 03/10/97 $32,640.42 PERA P.E.R.A. PAYABLE 031097 GENERAL FD PRO P.E.R.A. PAYAB < *> $32,640.42* 174629 03/10/97 $23.37 PERA P.E.R.A. PAYABLE 0310/97 GENERAL FD PRO P.E.R.A. PAYAB < *> $23.37* 174631 03/10/97 - $92.95 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 475668 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 03/10/97 $894.49 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 475730 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 03/10/97 - $12.75 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 476216 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 03/10/97 - $81.25 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 476218 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 03/10/97 - $68.50 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 476220 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 03/10/97 -$7.20 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 476347 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 03/10/97 -$7.40 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 476351 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 03/10/97 $1,472.23 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 477127 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 03/10/97 $1,609.84 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 477153 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 03/10/97 $2,520.00 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 477561 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 03/10/97 $229.12 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 477631 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 03/10/97 $2,929.43 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 477638 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 03/10/97 $7,694.27 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 477639 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 03/10/97 $3,155.56 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 477680 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER TUE, APR 8, 1997, 6:58 PM page 2 CHECK NO CHECK DT CHECK.AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION - INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. -------------------- ------------------------------------------- ------------------------------ - - - - -= < *> $20,234.89* 1,75059 03/17/97 COST OF 175060 03/17/97 WI 03/17'/97 VERNON SELLING 03/17/97 OF 03/17/97 WINE 03/17/97 WINE 03/17/97 OF 03/17/97 SOLD WI 175061 03/24/97 - 03/24/97 GD 03/24/97 QUALITY 03/24/97 COST 03/24/97 GOODS 03/24/97 WI 03/24/97 YORK SELLING 03/24/97 OF 03/24/97 WINE 03/24/97 WINE -COST-OF 175062 03/24/97 SOLD 03/24/97 c *> VERNON SELLING 175064 03/31/97 03/31/97 03/31/97 03/31/97 03/31/97 03/31/97 03/31/97 03/31/97 03/31/97 175065 03/31/97 $8,526.38 NSP $8,526.38* - $5._91 $1,415.59 $1,482.84 $734.84 $2,189.85 $3,484.24 $3,827.07 $13,128.52* $381.75 - $22.66 - $80.75 $39.65 $513.45 $1,592.01 $1,670.27 $3,926.77 $4,672.40 $1,382.20 $13,995.79* $379.14 $73.61 $452.75* - $37.00 $2,800.73 $66.95 $944.59 $2,398.77 $107.63 $2,897.38 $3,813.97 $1,341.92 $14,334.94* $450.50 $450.50* $213,036.62* LIGHT & POWER 032197 DISTRIBUTION -LIGHT & POWER QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 477324 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 478971 50TH ST SELLIN.CST OF GD WINE QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD. WI 479039 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE QUALITY WINE -COST-OF GOODS SOLD WI 479040 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE. QUALITY.•WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 479549 ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 479550 YORK SELLING -CST OF GD LIQU QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 479555 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 478971CO 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 479261 50TH ST SELLIN_CST OF GD LIQU QUALITY WINE. -COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 479899 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 479901 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 480867 50TH ST SELLIN.CST OF GD WINE QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4808 -94 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 481269 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 481527 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI..481528 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI,481529 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU TESSMAN SEED INC GENERAL SUPPLIES S006828 ED BUILDING & 'GENERAL SUPPLI TESSMAN SEED INC GENERAL SUPPLIES S0007504 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 481836 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 482733 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 482734 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 482734 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 482867 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 482867CO VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 483366 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 483455 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 483456 50TH ST.SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU UNUM LIFE INSURANCE CO HOSPITALIZATION APRIL 97 CENT SVC GENER HOSPITALIZATIO i" COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY FOR HAND CHECKS TUE, APR 8, 1997, 6:59 PM page 1 ----------------------------------------------- FUND # 10 GENERAL FUND ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- $136,764.89 FUND # 30 EDINBOROUGH /CENTENNIAL LAK $452.75 FUND # 40 UTILITY FUND $8,526.38 FUND # 50 LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND $61,694.14 FUND # 73 I -494 COMMISSION $5,598.46 $213,036.62* JAMES VAN VALKENBURG 4204 Philbrook Lane Edina, Minnesota 55424 (612) 922 -2982 TO: Edina City Council FROM: Jim Van Valkenburg, Chair of the Art Center Board RE: EDINA ART CENTER MEDIA LAB DATE: April 15, 1997 Within the last couple of years, the Edina City Council approved the construction of a Media Lab. The project was a remodeling of the second floor of the Art Center, and the work was done by Bob Kojetin. Thereafter, the purchase of equipment from Hennepin County was authorized, as the media center at the Southdale Library was closing. At that time, Edina paid $8,000 for $50,000 worth of equipment. The operation since installation has been profitable. It appears to us that profits would increase with more space and more equipment. Please refer to Eric Anderson's attached analysis. A very generous donation has been proposed that would pay for much of the suggested addition. We hope to have a ground- breaking on April 24' to announce this publicly —and to the surprise of the honoree. For years, Edina has required developers to contribute a part of their development to Edina in the form of land or cash. That fund's balance now is $571,000, less a $200,000 prior commitment. At this time, I am asking for funding for the Art Center Media Lab. Please review the attached diagram of the architectural drawings which have been approved by the donors and Edina's staff. We can discuss any questions you might have —I am no architect! Our estimates of cost are as follows: • Donation of $75,000 (50% of the cost of the Media Center) • Referendum money -- $25,000 —for a new f imace • Balance of $150,000 from developer's fund to do the non - referendum items that are more economic now than separately • The total project is $250,000, which includes the Media Lab at $150,000; additional items are restroom, class, storage and a modernized kitchen. Much will be done "in house" at a savings —but it must be paid for. Please call me with any questions you might have, so I can have answers for you at the April 21" Council Meeting. f Media Lab.xls,4/7 /97 A. o e En Art Center: Media Lab Expansion Assumption Description % Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Beginning Funding Sources: Private Donation Developer's Fund Cable Funds Fundraising Events Corporate Sponsors Grants Referendum Contribution Total Beginning Funding Income: % of hours rented 20% 25% 30% 35% 40°x6 45% 50% Hourly Lab Use 72,000 90,000 108,000 126,000 144,000 162,000 180,000 Class Tuition 10"A 30,000 33,000 36,300 39,930 43,923 48,315 53,147 Equipment Rental 10% 12,500 13,750 15,125 16,638 18,301 20,131 22,145 Memberships 10% 6,250 6,875 7,563 8,319 9,151 10,066 11,072 Retail Sales 10% 5,000 5,500 6,050 6,655 7,321 8,053 8,858 Group Room Rental 10% 1,500 1,650 1,815 1,997 2,196 2,416 2,657 Locker Rental 10% 600 660 726 799 878 966 1.063 Totallneome 127,850 151,435 175,579 200,336 225,770 251,947 278,942 Expenses Payroll Full Time Employee 3% 38,180 39,325 40,505 41,720 42,972 44,261 45,589 Part Time Employees 3% 10,400 16,068 22,067 22,729 23,411 24,113 24,836 Benefits/Central Services 3% 11,879 12,235 12,602 12,980 13,369 13.770 14,184 60,459 67,628 75,174 77,429 79,752 82,144 84,609 Contractual Services Advertising %of Revenue 12,785 15,144 17,558 20,034 22,577 25,195 27,894 Conferences & Schools 3% 1,500 1,545 1,591 1,639 1,688 1,739 1,791 Dues & Subscriptions 3% 500 515 530 546 563 580 597 Utilities 3% 6,000 6,180 6,365 6,556 6,753 6,956 7,164 Telephone 3% 7,200 7,416 7,638 7,868 8,104 8,347 8,597 Contracted Maintenance 3% 2,500 2,575 2,652 2,732 2,814 2,898 2,985 Insurance 3% 1,200 1,236 1,273 1,311 1.351 1,391 1,433 31,685 34,611 37,609 40,686 43,849 47,105 50,462 Supplies Generat/Office Supplies 3% 2,500 2,575 2,652 2,732 2,814 2,898 2,985 Printing 3% 1,000 1,030 1,061 1,093 1,126 1,159 1,194 Software 3% 15,000 2,000 2,060 2,122 2,185 2,251 2.319 18,500 5,605 5,773 5,946 6,125 6,308 6,498 Capital Expenditures Facility 0% EquipmentfReplacement 3% 100,000 47,500 48,925 50,393 51,905 53,462 55,066 100,000 47,500 48,925 50,393 51,905 53,462 55,066 Total Expenses 210.644 155.344 167,481 174,454 18i.630 189.020 196,634 Net Incomel(Loss) (82,794) (3,909) 8,098 25.882 44.140 62.927 82.308 Cumulative Incomel(Loss) (82,794) (86,702) Page 1 (78,605) (52,723) (8,583) 54,344 136,652 $150,000 $100,000 $50,000 N 0 0 $0 ($50,000) ($100,000) Sheetl Chart 1 Media Lab ProfiV(Loss) a ( (78,605) 82,794) ` i '�■� (86 2) : s �' i Year Page 1 136,652 82,308 +Annual +/- --� Cumul. qk Art Center: Media Lab Expansion Assumptions Payroll: • Payroll reflects 1 full time employee @ 40 hrs/week • 1997 - 1 PT employee @ 20 hrs /week, 1998 -1.5 PT employees @ 20hrs /week, 1999 - 2 PT employees @ 20 hrs /week • Benefits reflect Flex Plan for one employee and 15% overhead for FICA/PERA/Worker's Compensation Insurance Equipment Replacement: • $100,000 new equipment purchase year one, equipment replacement schedule for following years based on a 4 year life of equipment ($150,000) plus $10,000 per year added for facility maintenance /upgrades Income: All revenues, except hourly lab use increased at 10% per year based on increase in level of activity - base year assumes 15 -20% of capacity • Hourly Lab Use - $72,000 - (5 stations @ $10 /hr, 2 stations @ $15 /hr, 8 stations @ $5 /hr) all based on a 20% of capacity usage, i.e. 20% of 3000 hours per station, years 2 -7 reflect 5% capacity increases to a total of 50% of capacity in year 7 • Class Tuition - $30,000 6 people x 5 days /week x 50 weeks • Equipment Rental - $12,500 - $250 /wk x 50 weeks • Memberships - $6,250 - 250 @ $25.00 per membership • Retail Sales - $5,000 - educated guess • Group Room Rental - $1,500 - $50.00 per use x 30 uses per year • Locker Rental - $600 - 50 lockers x $12/year