The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1997-11-17_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 17,1997 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Commissioner, Council Member or citizen so requests it. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the Agenda. I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of HRA - Meeting of November 3,1997 II. CHANGE ORDER NO.1 Lewis Engineering Demolition Project Rollcall III. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS as per pre -list dated 11/12/97 TOTAL: $390,000.24 and for confirmation of payment of Claims as per pre -list dated 10/21/97 TOTAL: $205,375.66 IV. ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL RECOGNITION OF STEVE GRAUSAM, EMPLOYEE AT EDINA LIQUOR STORE PROCLAMATION CHEMICAL HEALTH AWARENESS WEEK I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of November 3,1997 II. Public Hearing On ProRosed Improvement Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Engineer. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. If Council wishes to proceed, action by resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council required to pass if improvement petitioned for; 4/5 favorable rollcall vote required if no petition. Rollcall A. Tree Trimming Project No. TT-98 - Area bounded by France Avenue to the east, 54th Street to the south, Highway 100 to the west and the City limits within those boundaries to the north. III. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS - Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. Zoning Ordinances: First and Second Reading require 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall of all members of Council to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. Conditional Use Permit: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. Rollcall A. Preliminary Rezoning, R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District to PSR-4, Planned Residence District, Opus, National LLC and Karrington Health Inc., 7128 France Avenue South (Lutheran Church of the Master site) IV. ORDINANCES First Reading: Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second Rea": Favorable rollcall vote of all Council members to pass. Rollcall A. Ordinance No. 1997-14 Amending Edina Code Section 1230 and 900 and modifying City Policy regarding the consumption of 3.2 % malt liquor at certain City Parks and Facilities Agend4lRlina City Council November17,1997 Page 2 Rollcall B. Ordinance No. 1997 -17 repealing Edina Code Section 1325 and replacing it with new Section 1326 regulating the sale and use of tobacco products. V. AWARD OF BID * A. Refuse Collection, City Properties * B. Two Dump Truck Boxes and Associated Snow Removal Equipment VI. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS A. Traffic Safety Report B. WMEP Presentation, Ken Dragseth * C. New Off -Sale 3.2 Malt Liquor License for Cub Foods, 6775 York Avenue D. Public Hearing -1998 Liquor License Fees Increase * E. Edina Comm ouncil Appointments * F. Set Decem er /5, 97 at 5:30 p.m. as a Special Meeting with the Human Relations Commissio * G. Set December 29,1997 at 5:00 p.m. as date for the Year End Meeting VII. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS VIII. CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS IX. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES X. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL XI. MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEM XII. FINANCE Rollcall A. Payment Of Claims As Per Pre -List Dated 11/12/97 TOTAL: $943,426.66 and for Confirmation of Payment of Claims as Per Pre -List Dated: 11/06/97 TOTAL: $942,248.63 Thur Nov 27 Fri Nov 28 Mon Dec 1 Wed Dec 3 Wed Dec 10 Mon Dec 15 Wed Dec 24 Thur Dec 25 Wed Dec 31 Thur Jan 1 Mon Jan 5 Mon Jan 19 Tues Jan 20 SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY - City Hall Closed DAY AFTER THANKSGIVING - City Hall Closed Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Truth In Taxation Hearing 5:00 P.M. Truth In Taxation Continuation Date 5:00 P.M. Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. CHRISTMAS EVE DAY - City Hall closes at noon CHRISTMAS DAY - City Hall Closed NEW YEAR'S EVE DAY - City Hall Closes at noon NEW YEAR'S DAY - City Hall Closed Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. MARTIN LUTHER KING DAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS k 911.TA,1l1r�'Z, �1 o e • ��flPf�NP�60 RESOLUTION LEVYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS A -179, HILLDALE AREA City of Edina WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Edina City Council has met and heard and passed upon all written and oral objections to the proposed assessments for the improvements listed below: Street Improvement No. A -179 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Each assessment as set forth in the assessment rolls on file in the office of the City Clerk for each aforementioned improvement is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. The assessments shall be payable in equal installments, the first of said installments, together with interest at a rate of 7.5% per annum, on the entire assessment from the date hereof to December 31, 1998, to be payable with the general taxes for the year 1998. To each subsequent installment shall be added interest at the above rate for one year on all then unpaid installments. The number of such installments shall be as follows: NAME OF IMPROVEMENT NO. OF INSTALLMENTS Street Improvement No., A -179, Levy No. 14140 10 years 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution; and they may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the-next succeeding year. 4. . The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such assessment shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted this 3rd day of November, 1997. City Hall (612) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 927 -7645 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 927 -5461 - lk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of November 3,1997and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this 20th day of November, 1997. I 1 • -- iy ZE J 1`ff 6 - . o e tr� Cn �o a• ��'�bflPOMT£ RESOLUTION LEVYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR TREE REMOVAL TR -97, City of Edina WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Edina City Council has met and heard and passed upon all written and oral objections to the proposed assessments for the tree removal as listed below: TREE REMOVAL - TR -97 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Each assessment as set forth in the assessment rolls on file in the office of the City Clerk for each aforementioned improvement is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. The assessments shall be payable in equal installments, the first of said installments, together with interest at a rate of 7.5% per annum, on the entire assessment from the date hereof to December 31, 1998, to be payable with the general taxes for the year 1998. To each subsequent installment shall be added interest at the above rate for one year on all then unpaid installments. The number of such installments shall be as follows: NAME OF IMPROVEMENT NO. OF INSTALLMENTS Tree Removal No. TR -97, Levy No. 14139 3 years 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is. paid within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution; and they may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. 4. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such assessment shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted this 3rd day of November. 1997. Member Faust seconded the motion. City Hall (612) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 927 -7645 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 927 -5461 i� .Y STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of November 3,1997and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this 20th day of November, 1997. Debra A, Man en, Ci Clerk MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY HELD AT CITY HALL NOVEMBER 3, 1997 - 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioner Faust, Hovland, Maetzold and Chairman Smith. Commissioner Kelly entered the meeting at 7:14 P.M. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Maetzold and seconded by Commissioner Hovland approving and adopting the HRA consent Agenda as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Maetzold, Smith Motion carried. PROPOSED PURCHASE OF LEE PROPERTY AT 50TH AND FRANCE Executive Director Hughes said on October 15, 1997, Edina Properties, Inc. withdrew its application with respect to the redevelopment of its property adjoining the Edina Theater. Staff was also advised that Edina Properties intended to terminate its Option Agreement on the Lee property (the "property ") located west of the 49 Y2 Street parking ramp to accommodate parking demand potentially created by the expansion of the Edina Theater. At the October 20`h meeting, staff advised that the HRA might wish to take assignment of this Option in order to preserve the Property for future parking expansion. Staff further advised that time was of the essence in that the Option would terminate on October 25"' unless extended by the payment of the monthly Option fee of $2,500.00. Staff was directed by the HRA to 1) request that Edina Properties extend the Option for one month at its expense, and 2) return with additional details concerning the Option. Mr. Hughes advised that Edina Properties agreed to extend the Option until November 25, 1997. Mr. Hughes presented a copy of the Option Agreement with major terms as follows: Purchase Price: $225,000.00 Option Fee: $2,500.00 on or before the 25 h of each month. The option fees are NOT refundable and are NOT applied to the purchase price. Term: The option terminates on January 21, 1998. Taxes & Special Assessments: Seller pays taxes and special assessments payable in the calendar year prior to closing. Current year taxes and specials are prorated between buyer and seller. (Note: If the HRA closed on the purchase in 1998, the Property would remain taxable for pay 1998 but would enjoy tax exempt status for pay 1999.) HRA/MINUTES November 3, 1997 Page 2 Investigations: The buyer is responsible for all environmental investigations prior to closing. No such investigations have been performed to our knowledge. Assignment: Either party may assign its rights under the agreement with prior written consent of the other party. Executive Director Hughes briefed the HRA concerning the size of the property, the current Assessor's Estimated Market Value, and the potential of the property to accommodate additional parking. Mr. Hughes said staff recommends the HRA request Lund's assign its rights under the Option Agreement to the HRA. Reasons for this recommendation are as follows: • The purchase price seems fair and reasonable given that it essentially reflects the Assessor's Estimated Market Value. • Purchase of the Property preserves the HRA's ability to construct additional off- street parking in the future if warranted. • Expansion of the 49 Y2 Street ramp is the most logical method of providing additional off - street parking if the HRA wishes to add such parking. Other existing ramps at 50' and France are not structurally capable of vertical expansion. Other potential ramp locations are less desirable in staffs opinion, e.g. Lund's Grocer Store parking lot, the lot west of the middle ramp, or the lot west of the Post Office. • If the Property is not needed for parking purposes, staff believes it can be re- marketed for future redevelopment. Commissioner Faust inquired whether we have an option to buy. Executive Director Hughes stated if authorization were granted, Lund's would be asked to assign us the option to buy and they would then seek permission from the seller to assign their 'rights for purchase also. The HRA would then be the beneficiary of the option and would do environmental tests on the site to make sure it is not contaminated, report back to the HRA and eventually head towards closing and acquisition of the Property. If, after environmental tests the site was found to be unacceptable, or if the HRA wished to reconsider, the HRA could back out without penalty except for the $2,500 per month to preserve the option. _ Commissioner Maetzold asked how this will be funded. Executive Director Hughes explained this is an eligible tax increment financing expense and funding would be from accumulated reserves from the 50°i and France tax increment district. Commissioner Maetzold asked if a funding source could be from special assessments from the businesses in the area. Executive Director Hughes answered in the past parking has m" -. , -e- -• .r " =.. . -- _._tb,, >'A?. .a.' -... � "aw"safn. ''3jFi''�- :fir'- 91E�`:, .wig HRA/MINUTES November 3, 1997 Page 3 been constructed through a combination of tax increment financing (80 %) and special assessments (20 %) and the same method could be used again. The formula could be adjusted if the law permitted use of tax increments on the project. Commissioner Maetzold inquired whether the site is marketable. Executive Director Hughes stated it is a marketable site and it is Zoned PC -2, Planned Commercial District, which is the same as the rest of the property. Attorney Gilligan was asked to check if the Property were encumbered by easements and none were found. A 20 foot building setback would be required from the rear property line. The site would accommodate a two story building to within 20 feet of the north property line. One desirable scenario would be if it could be marketed and redeveloped with the property to the west. Commissioner Hovland questioned the reduction in price of the Property and its marketability. Executive Director Hughes said the price at $225,000 is more in keeping with sales within the 50'h& France area. Commissioner Hovland asked what the cost is per parking stall, historically. Executive Director Hughes commented it is varied. The last ramp built cost approximately $900,000.00 ($8,000 - $9,000 per stall).The HRA has never purchased land before for parking at 50' & France. Chair Smith asked if a 20 foot setback is normally required from the rear lot line. Executive Director Hughes said yes, approximately. The 49 Y2 Street ramp was granted a setback variance conditioned upon additional landscaping. Chair Smith inquired if Edina Properties in their approved development west of the Theater were required to pay in construction money. Executive Director Hughes said typically an equalizing assessment is required, or approximately $2.00 per foot of floor area. Commissioner Kelly asked if Lund's has appraised the site. Executive Director Hughes said no appraisal had been done, to his knowledge. Commissioner Faust asked if the proposed purchase is completed could the lot be used for surface parking. Executive Director Hughes said yes it could be utilized. Commissioner Hovland asked when the previous Council approved the retail office project between the Theater and Doctors building, was consideration given to a staging area for equipment. Could the proposed site be used for this purpose. Chair Smith called for public comment. No comments were heard. Commissioner Kelly suggested staff contact the Lee Family to see if the monthly $2,500.00 could be credited to the purchase price. He stated it is reasonable to take the position that if the Option is not exercised the payment would be non - refundable. n Y HRA/MINUTES November 3, 1997 Page 4 Chair Smith asked direction from the Council, to proceed with a purchase agreement, subject to an environmental assessment, and for all payments after November 25, 1997, be applied to that purchase price, until closing. - Commissioner Maetzold made a motion to approach and request from Lund's the assignation of its rights under the Option to the HRA, with respect to the purchase of the Lee Property at 50th & France, to order the environmental assessment to be completed, and to request the monthly fee of $2,500.00 be applied to the purchase price. Commissioner Kelly seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold, Smith Motion carried. CLAIMS PAID Commissioner Hovland made a motion to approve payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated October 29, 1997, and consisting of one page totaling $21,641.66. Commissioner Faust seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold, Smith Motion carried. There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, Chair Smith declared the meeting adjourned. Executive Director 1. REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: Francis Hoffman 0 ou City Engineer ✓✓ Date: November 17, 1997 Subject: Change Order No. 1 Building Demolition & Removal - 5229 Eden Avenue Lewis Engineering Site Recommendation: Agenda Item # II.HRA Consent Information Only Mgr. Recommends Approve Change Order No. 1 for project 97- 5(HRA). Info /Background: Action ❑ To HRA ® To Council ® Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion This change order is for extra work required on the building demolition at the Lewis Engineering site. An additional underground storage tank of 4000 gallons was discovered while demolishing the structure. The contractor had to bring in a subcontractor to pump out and remove the contents plus remove the tank and dispose of appropriately. The extra costs to do the additional work was $7,453.40. This exceeds the ten percent contract limit and needs specific Council approval prior to payment. Staff recommends approval of said change order. The new total contract price with change order is $54,366.40. COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 21 -OCT -1997 (19:03) page 1 CHECK CHECK CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT NUM -NO- 13230 -DT -- 10/20/97 - ------ $.198,697.16 - - - - -- --------- - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - -- --- - - - - -- -- - C.S. McCrossan Construe Construction 97 -3 #3 CENTENNIAL LAK PARKS - -PO- - - - -- < *> $198,697.16* 13231 10/20/97 $6,678.50 C.S. McCrossan Construe Construction 97 -2 #5 CENTENNIAL LAK PARKS' < *> $6,678.50* $205,375.66* COUNCIL CHECx REGISTER 12 -..-V -1997 (19:14) page 1 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 13244 11/17/97 $155,076.57 C.S. McCrossan Construct Construction 97 -3 #4 CENTENNIAL LAK PARKS < *> $155,076.57* 13245 11/17/97 $346.25 COUNTRY CLUB TURF Sod 1801 CENTENNIAL LAK PARKS 539 < *> $346.25* 13246 11/17/97 $744.20 DALE GREEN CO. Black dirt 110197 CENTENNIAL LAK PARKS < *> $744.20* a 13247 11/17/97 $17.50 Ellmers, Greta Parking permit refund 695 50TH STREET PARKING PERMIT < *> $17.50* 13248 11/17/97 $191,063.13 GLOBAL SPECIALTY CONTRAC Construction 97 -4 #2 CENTENNIAL LAK PARKS < *> $191,063.13* 13249 11/17/97 $53.97 LARSON, BOB Uniforms 110797 CENTENNIAL LAK PARKS < *> $53.97* 13250 11/17/97 $4,869.12 LEITNER COMPANY Greens soil mix 103197 CENTENNIAL LAK PARKS < *> $4,869.12* 13251 11/17/97 $833.35 NOVAK'S GARAGE Bridge for putting co 731 CENTENNIAL LAK PARKS 9123 < *> $833.35* 13252 11/17/97 $2,033.00 PIRKL ASSOC, THE Putting course 110397 CENTENNIAL LAK PARKS < *> $2,033.00* 13253 11/17/97 $1,689.50 PRIOR LAKE AGGREGATE Boulders for PC 710034 CENTENNIAL LAK PARKS < *> $1,689.50* 13254 11/17/97 $256.50 SUNDE LAND SURVEYING INC Grandview survey 22478 GRANDVIEW PRO FEE ARCH /E < *> $256.50* 13255 11/17/97 $1,820.00 Thomas & Sons Constructi Sewer abandonment 00977511 CENTENNIAL LAK UNDERGROUND < *> $1,820.00* 13256 11/17/97 $31,197.15 Veit & Company Inc Construction 97 -5 #1 CENTENNIAL LAK PARKS < *> $31,197.15* $390,000.24* s /1NA O` r� 1� V1 • ,�CORPORP��O� lase A PROCLAMATION. WHEREAS, over half a million Americans will die this year from alcohol, tobacco and other drug- related causes; and WHEREAS, every man, woman and child in America pays nearly $1,000 annually to cover the costs of unnecessary health care, extra law enforcement, auto accidents, crime, and lost productivity resulting from substance abuse; and WHEREAS, every person in the State of Minnesota is affected by alcohol, tobacco and other drug abuse; and WHEREAS, prevention and treatment efforts have made major gains in reversing the trend toward more and more alcohol, tobacco and other drug use in our communities; and WHEREAS, the color red has been chosen to represent individual and community commitment to efforts to reduce demand for alcohol and other drugs in our communities; and . WHEREAS, business, government, law enforcement, schools, religious institutions, service organizations, neighborhoods, youth, senior citizens, and other individuals are encouraged to demonstrate their commitment to help reduce and prevent alcohol, . tobacco and other drug abuse by wearing and /or displaying the color red during Minnesota Chemical Health Week. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that November 17-23,1997, be declared MINNESOTA CHEMICAL HEALTH WEEK throughout the City of Edina. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and Council Members of the City of Edina support the activities sponsored by the Minnesota Chemical Health Week, MADD's Red Ribbon Project, and D -Day and encourage the citizens of Edina to participate in all Minnesota Chemical Health Week activities and other alcohol and drug abuse prevention efforts year round. Glenn L. Smith, Mayor im MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL NOVEMBER 3, 1997 - 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Faust, Hovland, Maetzold, and Mayor Smith. Member Kelly entered the meeting at 7:14 P.M. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Maetzold and seconded by Member Hovland to approve and adopt the Consent Agenda as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Maetzold, Smith Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF OCTOBER 20, 1997, AND SPECIAL MEETING OF OCTOBER 20. 1997. APPROVED Motion made by Member Maetzold and seconded by Member Hovland approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of October 20, 1997, and Special Meeting of October 20, 1997. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. BOY SCOUT TROOP 78 AND TROOP 62 WELCOMED Mayor Smith welcomed Boy Scout Troop 78 from Christ Presbyterian Church, and Troop 62 from St. Stephen's Episcopal Church to the Council meeting and invited their participation in the activities as part of completion of their Citizenship badges. PUBLIC HEARING CONDUCTED ON STREET IMPROVEMENT NO A -179, COOPER AVENUE, COOPER CIRCLE SPUR ROAD CIRCLE EAST AND CIRCLE WEST• ASSESSMENTS LEVIED Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Due notice having been given, a public hearing was conducted and action taken as recorded on the following proposed assessment. 1. STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. A -179 Location: Cooper Avenue, Cooper Circle, Spur Road, Circle East and Circle West. Analysis of assessment for Improvement No. A -179 showed a total construction cost of $114,492.35 proposed to be assessed against 7 lots at $1,595.89 per lot and 56 lots at $1,845.02 per lot. Engineer Hoffman explained this meeting is a continuation of the hearing from October 6, 1997. The primary issues from the October 6'" meeting were, 1) who is being assessed for the street improvement and 2) the durability of the top paved surface. Engineer Hoffman pointed out that Orchard Lane was shown on the map as a test section constructed in 1995 with the costs bome by the City. In April 1996 the Council added Cooper Circle into the project to improve all the streets in the area at the same time. Of specific concern was the asphalt surface on Cooper Avenue. Braun Intertec was asked to take cores of the asphalt and their report follows: Braun Intertec's analysis of the structure was that: Y • Structure and Durability Exceeded the Design Specifications Intent • Density and Sanding Was Adequate Area of Assessment: • All of Hilldale Area • Costs for Test Section on Orchard Lane NOT in Assessment Ten Year Assessment Assessment is 16% Less than Estimated Cost in 1996 Council Comment Member Kelly inquired if any irregularities were discovered in our Public Hearing Notices or within the assessing records in response to the resident who voiced concern at the October 6 meeting. Engineer Hoffman said the seller would have been aware of any pending assessments but he has not examined the assessing records. Member Faust asked for further information on the test section. Engineer Hoffman said a, test section of street was done on Orchard Lane in 1995 for two reasons; 1) it was a cost effective way to improve low volume roadways and, 2) it has a short construction scenario. Member Hovland asked how residents determine if they are a part of the assessment process. Engineer Hoffman said the same legal procedure was followed for this assessment as for public hearings in the past. If a resident received a notice with an assessment amount affixed, it proved they were a benefited property. If the Council chose to change the assessment amount, all affected residents would be noticed again with the corrected amount. Member Hovland inquired whether interest was accrued on the ten year assessments. Engineer Hoffman stated, yes. Member Maetzold asked clarification on the reduction in assessment for Cooper Circle. Engineer Hoffman explained residents of Cooper Circle were included in on the assessment even though their street had more life left in it. Staff felt a pro -rata share, or $250.00 less would be an equitable amount of reduction for Cooper Circle residents. Had they not agreed with the decision, they could have petitioned themselves out of the process. Mayor Smith asked what type of thing he should be looking for in the area. Engineer Hoffman said of the batches of asphalt that were laid, one was too cool and was not rolled as quickly as it should have been in order to get the proper density. While the density'requirements were met according to Braun Intertec, the asphalt company would not be liable. Any cost to mill and overlay the area would be bome by the City. All asphalt mix follows a state specified formula. Mayor Smith suggested staff search assessment records for pending assessments on new residents of the area. Resident Comment John and Julie Labosky, 3 Orchard Lane, stated proposed assessment A -179 is patently unfair to residents of four lots on Orchard Lane. In 1995 Orchard Lane residents were told their street would be a test section for a new method of resurfacing and there, would be no charge for this test. The work was completed in 1995. On April 4, 1996, Notices of Public Hearing were mailed to residents of Cooper Avenue, Cooper Circle, Spur Road, Circle East, Circle. West and Orchard Lane even though Orchard Lane was not listed on the Notice. To the best of Mr. Labosky's knowledge the legal description on the Notice did not include Orchard Lane. He believes this is not a legal Notice for residents of Orchard Lane and they should not be assessed for work done on other streets. A fairer way of assessing would be to charge on a lineal foot basis. He asked exemption of the assessment for 3 Orchard, 4 Orchard, 5 Orchard and 6 Orchard as patently unfair because, 1) no improvements were done to Orchard, 2) proper notice was not given, 3) an area method of assessment is unfair, and 4) a fairer way to assess would be by lineal foot. John and July Labosky presented a letter to the Clerk dated November 3, 1997, as written notice of appeal of the proposed assessment on their property. 2 Minutes /Edina City Council /November 3, 1997 Mr. Labosky presented the Clerk with a letter dated November 3, 1996, from Edward Moersfelder, 4 Orchard Lane, who was unable to attend the meeting. The letter stated objection to the proposed assessment at 4 Orchard Lane. Mayor Smith asked how residents of Orchard should fit into the equation. Mr. Labosky responded they should not pay anything for improvements on Cooper nor should they pay for Interlachen or Vernon. People who live on the streets should pay for their streets. Member Kelly said he grew up on Circle West and is very familiar with the area. Any of the streets in Hilldale could have been chosen to be the test street but Orchard was chosen. It concerns him that because Orchard Lane was chosen, residents feel they should not be assessed equally. He feels the assessment is fair and would not change the direction the Council voted in April 1996. Mr. Labosky stated the process should have been explained and residents should not have been told they would not be assessed for the test. Member Hovland asked clarification from Mr. Labosky, of what he actually wanted, 1) an exemption of the assessment for four residences on Orchard Lane, or 2) to be assessed on a lineal foot. Member Hovland asked how lineal front footage would equate to usage. Mr. Labosky said everyone uses the street in front of their property but usage is not a fair way of assessing. Member Hovland asked if a resident with a corner lot should pay more. Mr. Labosky said yes because of access from two directions. Mayor Smith reiterated to Mr. Labosky that his receipt of the April 1996 Notice of Public Hearing is proof that the opportunity to participate in the hearing was given. Rhonda Altom, 6 Orchard Lane, said residents on Orchard understood their street was the test site for all of Edina but it was not worth the inconvenience and mess it caused. A City employee said residents would not be assessed for the Orchard test nor would they be when all of Hilldale was assessed. Upon receipt of the April 1996 Public Hearing Notice, she phoned City Hall and was told they weren't sure if Orchard was included. She thought the Notice was just a courtesy. Admittedly, Orchard Lane residents use a portion of Cooper to reach their homes but she is taxed $15,000 per year and as a disabled, single person should be allowed to use 55 feet of Cooper Avenue to reach Orchard Lane. Ms. Altom submitted a written notice dated October 22, 1997, objecting to Orchard Lane being included in the proposed assessment. Mark Maciejewski, 6 Orchard Lane, informed Council they purchased their home in July 1996. Before purchasing their home on Orchard, they considered a home at 5 Cooper. In April 1996 the realtor checked for pending assessments on Cooper and found there was a pending $2,000 assessment. in May 1996 the realtor checked for pendings on the Orchard property and found none. At their July 15, 1996 closing, the Orchard Lane property had no pending assessments. Mr. Maciejewski said he believes there are problems with the City's notification process, and no listing of assessments through title searches. Deborah Linder, 6 Orchard Lane, phoned City Hall on approximately July 1, 1996, to check on pending assessments and was told there were none. Four scenarios could have happened; 1) the title company made a mistake, 2) they made a mistake, 3) the realtor made a mistake, or 4) the City did not put the assessment on the property. Ms. Linder stated the Notice was not clear that it applied to Orchard Lane and the process should be improved. Mayor Smith commented that without further information he would not excuse residents of Orchard Lane from the assessment. After acquiring further information he would be willing to meet with Orchard Lane residents again. 3 Minutes /Edina City Council /November 3, 1997 Ms. Linder stated Orchard Lane has not been brought up to the same standard as the .rest of Edina. Orchard has no curb and gutters as well as the appearance of the street is much worse than the greater Hilldale area. Mayor Smith informed Ms. Linder if curb and gutters are desired, neighbors must sign a petition asking the City to install curb and gutters and all abutting properties would pay for them. Mr. Maciejewski submitted a written objection to the proposed assessment, dated November 3, 1997. Mayor Smith asked acquiescence of the Council to complete the assessment hearing at this meeting and to allow the residents at 6 Orchard Lane to present their case at a later date and time to be determined. Council' Comment Member Faust asked procedurally if the issue was discussed and voted on April 6, 1997, why is it being revisited again. Engineer Hoffman explained, 1) a Public Hearing was held April 15, 1996, where it was discussed whether the project should even be done, 2) all residents were noticed and discussions held how the assessment would be accomplished, and 3) opinions varied from assessments on a front foot basis to an area wide assessment. Engineer Hoffman said tonight is the official vote for the assessment. Member Maetzold pointed out he was on the Council in April 1996 when discussion, was held whether Orchard Lane was a part of the assessment or not. He believes the area wide assessment is the fair way to approach this development. Member Hovland believes the due process.on. this issue has been fulfilled with the appearance of the residents on Orchard Lane. He wondered if one method of assessment is more fair than the other, and he concurs with the previous Council's decision that the area wide assessment is the fair method. Because a resident has a larger lot or bigger house does not mean they have more means to pay a larger assessment, nor should the person be unfairly punished because they live on a corner or a curve. He reiterated his concurrence with the previous Council for an area wide assessment except for 6 Orchard Lane which would be heard again at a time to be determined. Member Kelly made several points; 1) he offered an apology to Mr. Maciejewski and Ms. Linder; they should have received an reply tonight about pending assessments on their property, 2) the Notice process is problematic and residents should not be expected to read legal descriptions on property; that issue has been resolved by their presence at this meeting, 3) an area wide assessment is fair and the best method, and 4) the test section could have been any street but everyone benefitted from a proportionate reduction based on the selection of a test site within the Hilldale neighborhood. Manager Rosland noted on the reverse side of the Notice of Public Hearing the underlined statement reads, "Your receipt of this notice is an indication that property whose ownership is listed to you is among those properties .which are considered to be benefited by the improvement." Member Kelly made a motion to adopt Assessment A -179 as originally proposed with the exception of 6 Orchard Lane which will be heard at a time to be designated. (Assessment levied by resolution as follows) Member Maetzold seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold, Smith 4 Minutes /Edina City Council /November 3. 1997 Motion carried. Following the presentation of analysis of assessment and approval, Member Kelly introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION LEVYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS A -179, HILLDALE AREA WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Edina City Council has met and heard and passed upon all written and oral objections to the proposed assessments for the improvements listed below: Street Improvement No. A -179 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Each assessment as set forth in the assessment rolls on file in the office of the City Clerk for each aforementioned improvement is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. The assessments shall be payable in equal installments, the first of said installments, together with interest at a rate of 7.5% per annum, on the entire assessment from the date hereof to December 31, 1998, to be payable with the general taxes for the year 1998. To each subsequent installment shall be added interest at the above rate for one year on all then unpaid installments. The number of such installments shall be as follows: NAME OF IMPROVEMENT NO. OF INSTALLMENTS Street Improvement No., A -179, Levy No. 14140 10 years 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution; and they may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year. 4. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such assessment shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted this 3nd day of November, 1997. Member Maetzold seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold, Smith Resolution adopted. PUBLIC HEARING CONDUCTED ON TREE REMOVAL (TR -97) 5801 ABBOTT AVENUE, 4633 DREXEL AVENUE. 5016 HANKERSON AVENUE, 6308 WATERMAN AVENUE: ASSESSMENT LEVIED Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Due notice having been given, a public hearing was conducted and action taken as recorded on the following proposed assessment. 1. TREE REMOVAL NO. TR -97 Location: 5801 Abbott Avenue, 4633 Drexel Avenue, 5016 Hankerson Avenue, 6308 Waterman Avenue Analysis of assessment for Improvement No. TR -97 showed a total assessable cost to 5801 Abbott Avenue at $979.80; 4633 Drexel Avenue at $1,385.65; 5016 Hankerson Avenue $639.00; and 6308 Waterman Avenue at $700.00. 5 Minutes /Edina City Council /November 3, 1997 Park Director Keprios explained that according to City Ordinance, when the City Forester finds a diseased tree on private property, residents are notified and asked to remove the tree within an allotted time period. If the resident chooses not to remove the tree in the specified time period, ,the City would have the tree removed and assess the homeowner. Director Keprios said he had not received any complaints from the residents. sl Mayor Smith asked when the next tree assessment comes before the Council if additional information could be included in the packet. He then called for public comment, no comments were heard. Member Maetzold introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION LEVYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR TREE REMOVAL TR -97, WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Edina City Council has met and heard and passed upon all written and oral objections to the proposed assessments for the tree removal as listed below: TREE REMOVAL - TR -97 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Each assessment as set forth in the assessment rolls on file in the office of the City Clerk for each aforementioned improvement is hereby accepted and shall constitute.the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. The assessments shall be payable in equal installments, the first of said instaliments, .together with interest at a rate of 7.5% per annum, on the entire assessment from the date hereof to December 31, 1998, to be payable with the general taxes for the year 1998. To each subsequent installment shall be added interest at the above rate for one year on all then unpaid installments. The number of such installments shall be as follows: NAME OF IMPROVEMENT NO. OF INSTALLMENTS Tree Removal No. TR -97, Levy No. 14139 3 years 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to .the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution; and they may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. 4. The Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such assessment shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted this 3rd day of November. 1997. Member Faust seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold, Smith Resolution adopted. *HEARING DATE SET OF NOVEMBER 17, 1997. FOR PLANNING MATTER Motion made by Member Maetzold and seconded by Member Hovland setting November 17, 1997, for public hearing for Preliminary Rezoning, R -1. Single Dwelling Unit district to PSR-4, Planned Residence District, Opus, National LLC and Karrington Health, Inc., 7128 France Avenue South (Lutheran Church of the Master). Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. Minutes /Edina City Council /November 3, 1997 ORDINANCE NO, 85OA -13 ADOPTED - FINAL REZONING AND FINAL PLAT APPROVED FOR EDINA CORPORATE CENTER (GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF COMPUTER AVENUE AND NORTH OF WEST 77114 STREET) Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Presentation by Assistant Planner Presentation by Assistant Planner Assistant Planner Aaker explained the request is for a Final Rezoning and Final Plat approval for Normandale Golf, Inc., and the City of Edina. The property is located south of Fred Richards Golf Course and is part of the property purchased by the City in 1992 from Normandale Golf, Inc., which consists of 27 acres. Normandale Golf, Inc., reserved an option on a six acre site fronting on West 7r Street for the purpose of developing it for office use. The Land Use Plan was amended in 1992 to show the site as office and a development contract was signed at the time between the City and Normandale Golf, Inc., addressing development issues. At the October 20, 1997, Council meeting, Preliminary Rezoning was granted for Normandale Golf, Inc., and the City of Edina with eleven conditions. The building will be known as Edina Corporate Center, a three story office building. There have been no changes to the building foot print nor to the parking arrangement since preliminary approval. Assistant Planner Aaker reminded the Council they granted Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Plat Approval for the proposed office development on October 20, 1997, with eleven conditions: 1. The existing berm landscaping must be removed and the berm rebuilt. A revised landscaping plan has been submitted which relocates the existing berm landscaping elsewhere on the site and provides new landscaping on the berm. Staff believes the proposed plan does not provide the level of screening requested by the Council. The developer has agreed to increase the landscaping as directed by the City Manager. A Landscaping Bond will be required to insure installation and maintenance of the landscaping. 2. The grading plan has been revised showing the berm reconstructed five feet above the parking lot grade. 3. Building, Engineering and Planning staff have reviewed lighting plans to insure no light will wash to adjoining residential properties. The northerly most lights will be timed to turn off at 10:00 P.M. 4. Storm water capacity of the pond has been reviewed, approved, and permits issued by the watershed district. 5. Plans presented satisfy the requirements for Final Rezoning. 6. Final Plat approval. 7. A Developers Agreement is not required since there are no new public improvements associated with the development. 8. Watershed District permits were granted on October 15, 1997. 9. Access easement to golf course will be recorded with the plat. 10. Necessary utility and drainage easements are shown on the plat. 11. The City will remove the fence and reinstall it along the northerly property line in the spring. On October 29, 1997, the Planning Commission reviewed and approved plans for the Final Rezoning of the project. The plans presented for Commission review and are now presented to Council are the same plans presented for Preliminary review with the exception of the changes to the berm height, enhanced landscaping, storm water drainage issues and lighting, as directed by the Council. The Planning Commission reviewed the request by the developer to increase building height 16 inches from the top of the parapet from 861 feet to 862 feet 4 inches or 16 inches more than allowed according to contract. The reason for the request was to accomplish nine foot ceilings on all three floors of the building. The Watershed District and City Engineer set a minimum first floor elevation of 824 feet, due to the establishment of flood elevation at 822 feet. The developer 7 Minutes /Edina City Council /November 3. 1997 cannot lower the first floor elevation below 824 feet so the developer is requesting relief of 16 inches. The Planning Commission recommended final rezoning and final plat approval to include satisfaction of the state of conditions and the proposed berm be constructed five feet above the level of the parking lot and recommended increasing the overall building height by 16 inches to a maximum elevation of 862.3. Council comment Member Faust asked if the parking lot grade is at the same level. Assistant Planner Aaker explained the .grade of the parking lot is the result of the storm water runoff and is lower in the center than the outer perimeter. Member Maetzold inquired whether curb cut access would be given to the Golf Maintenance Building. Assistant Planner Aaker said no improvement is planned at this time but an easement is needed to maintain access. Member Hovland asked if the additional landscape trees would be placed on the north end of the berm. Assistant Planner Aaker answered the trees would be staggered on and below the berm. Manager Rosland explained the new trees would form a hedge type of screen. Resident comment Tom Anderson, 7453 West Shore Drive, asked what the height of the berm will be on the west end. Engineer Hoffman said the parking lot might come up but the berm will not be disturbed with the approximate height being .at 6 feet. Mr. Anderson said this seems like an ideal time to raise the berm further to assure residents there will be no wash from lights from cars. He further inquired if lights go off. at 10_:00 P.M. what time will they go on. Assistant Planner Aaker said typically light restrictions would be off at 10:00 P.M. and on at 7:00 A.M. David Menke, Opus Corporation indicated a continued willingness to work with the City to fine tune any concerns of either the developer or the City. Member Hovland moved approval of First Reading of Ordinance No. 850 1 -13 And waiver of Second Reading approving the rezoning the vacant lot: ORDINANCE NO. 850 -A13 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 850) BY REZONING PROPERTY FROM R -1, SINGLE DWELLING DISTRICT TO POD -1, PLANNED OFFICE DISTRICT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Subsection 850.06 of Section 850 of the Edina City Code is amended by adding the following thereto: "The extent of the POD -1, Planned Office District, is enlarged by the addition of the following property: That part of Tract R, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1050, files of Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota described as follows: Beginning at the northwest corner of Tract A, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1218, files of Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota; thence on an assumed bearing of South 0 degrees 21 minutes 00 seconds West along an east line of said Tract R, a distance of 473.91 .feet, to, a corner of said Tract R; thence on a bearing of WEST, along the south line of said Tract R, a distance of 458.36 feet, to an angle point in said south line; thence North 65 degrees 20 minutes 45 seconds West, along the southwesterly line of said Tract R, a distance of 159.72 feet, to a corner of said Tract R; thence North 24 degrees 39 minutes 15 seconds East, along a westerly line of said Tract R, a distance of E:3 Minutes /Edina City Council /November 3. 1997 333.91 feet, to an angle point in said westerly line; thence North 0 degrees 10 minutes 30 seconds East, along said westerly line, a distance of. 53.80 feet, to a corner of said Tract R; thence North 26 degrees 04 minutes 37. seconds East a distance of 90.00 feet; thence North 87 degrees 31 minutes 14 seconds East a distance of 125.00 feet; thence North 49 degrees 51 minutes 53 seconds East a distance of 56.09 feet; thence South 89 degrees 55 minutes 40 seconds East a distance of 225.00 feet; thence South 25 degrees 39 minutes 23 seconds east a distance of 80.00 feet, to the point of beginning. The extent of the R -1, Single Dwelling District is reduced by removing the property described above from the R -1 Single Dwelling District." - I - - Section 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its' passage and publication. Motion seconded by Member Faust. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold, Smith Ordinance adopted. Member Maetzold introduced the following resolution and moved its approval conditioned upon, 1) Landscape plan to be augmented on the north side of the project, and to include some plantings that remain green year round, 2) Increase the height, size and shape of the berm to match the west end of the berm, 3) Lighting specifications be reviewed to ensure no wash from the project will spill into the residential neighborhood, 4) Review plans to ensure adequate storm water storage is provided, 5) Final Rezoning, 6) Final Plat, 7) Developers Agreement, 8) Watershed District Permit, 9) Access easement to Golf Course, 10) Utility and Drainage Easement, 11) Relocation of existing fence along northerly property line, and 12) Increase in elevation to 862 feet 4 inches. RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR EDINA OFFICE CENTER BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota that that certain plat entitled, "Edina Office Center" a Minnesota corporation and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council on November 3, 1997, be and is hereby granted final plat approval. Member Faust seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Maetzold, Kelly, Smith Resolution adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 1997 -14, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING EDINA CODE SECTION 1230 AND 900 AND MODIFYING CITY POLICY REGARDING THE CONSUMPTION OF 3.2% MALT LIQUOR AT CERTAIN CITY PARKS AND FACILITIES Park Director Keprios reminded Council the Park Board initially recommended Section 1230 of the City Code be amended allowing for consumption (but not sale of) intoxicating malt liquor at certain park locations. Staff was directed to study risks vs. rewards of the proposal associated with the sale and /or consumption of intoxicating and non - intoxicating malt liquor at certain park locations. Results of staffs findings are as follows: • Edinborough Park has only 4 -5 Saturdays per year that the facility isn't rented for various reasons, 1) the lack of ability to sell any form of liquor, or 2) time of year. • Park facilities currently allowed to sell non - intoxicating malt liquor are Braemar Golf Course, Braemar Golf Dome and Fred Richards Golf Course. They do not lose potential business due to the inability to serve or sell intoxicating malt liquor (strong beer). • In order to sell intoxicating malt liquor, park facilities would need to acquire a wine license; all employees, serving or selling intoxicating malt liquor must be a minimum of 18 years of age and the City would have to pay higher insurance premiums. Minutes /Edina City Council /November 3, 1997 • Approximately $30,000 in additional revenues could be realized from the golf courses collectively through the sale of non - intoxicating malt liquor on the golf courses, however insurance premiums may increase. • Staff believes the sale of non - intoxicating malt liquor (3.2% beer) on the golf courses would not create unacceptable risks. Surveying other cities, problems on other public courses have been minimal. The survey also indicated only 12% beer (not strong beer) is sold on every public golf course surveyed. • On rare occasions, guests at. private rental functions consume too much wine or 3/2% beer simply because no cash bar is permitted; this has not been a major problem. • In staffs opinion, allowing private rentals to serve their guests intoxicating malt liquor does not present any unacceptable risks. • From the customer's perspective, a greater demand for a cash bar (even if it is only wine and 3.2% beer) exists than the demand for strong beer or hard liquor. From the City's perspective, there is no financial advantage to the City to allow guests to sell wine, intoxicating malt liquor or non - intoxicating malt liquor. Director Keprios said in viewing risks vs. rewards, staffs recommendation would be that the Council approve the Park Board's recommendation to amend the City Code to allow intoxicating malt liquor to be consumed in the following locations: 1. Inside the clubhouse of a golf course, 2. Inside a programmed park or indoor recreational facility located in a park, 3. Not within picnic shelters, warming houses, the ballfield complex or .Van Valkenburg Park, ice arenas or maintenance buildings. Staff further recommends the City Code be amended to allow for sale of non - intoxicating malt liquor (3.2% beer) on- any outdoor property of a city owned golf course. Director Keprios suggested as a housekeeping item, the addition of Section 3 to Ordinance .No. 1997 -14, replacing all references to "non - intoxicating malt liquor" in the existing Code with 3.2 percent malt liquor. The change in terminology is a result of recent changes in Minnesota Statutes 340A. Following a brief discussion, Council consensus was to direct staff to clarify language on the proposed Ordinance and that it be placed on the Agenda for November 17, 1997. It was further suggested policies be implemented for 1) strict inventory control of beer available for sale on the golf courses, and 2) the age limit of youth selling beer at the golf courses. *BIDS REJECTED FOR FIRE STATION RE- ROOFING Motion made by Member Maetzold and seconded by Member Hovland rejecting all bids for re- roofing the Tracy Avenue Fire Station; job to be re -bid in the spring. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. BID AWARDED FOR HVAC EQUIPMENT FOR ART CENTER MEDIA LAB Manager Rosland explained the same process was being followed for the heating and ventilation equipment for the Art Center Media Lab. It was suggested the Council waive the City's $20,000 bid limit and to follow the State mandate requiring bids over $25,000. Member Hovland made a motion for award of bid for HVAC Equipment for the Art Center Media Lab to recommended low bidder, C.O. Carlson Air Conditioning Company at $23,745.00. Member Maetzold seconded the motion. Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold, Smith Motion carried. *HEARING DATE OF NOVEMBER 17 1997 SET FOR TREE TRIMMING IMPROVEMENT NO TT-98 Motion made by Member Maetzold and seconded by Member Hovland setting a hearing date of November 17, 1997, for Tree Trimming Improvement No. TT -98. 10 Minutes /Edina City Council /November 1-1997 Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *1998 COUNCIL MEETING DATES SET Motion made by Member Maetzold and seconded by Member Hovland approving 1998 Council Meeting dates other than the first and third Mondays as follows: Tuesday January 20 (Monday January 19 is Martin Luther King Day) Tuesday February 17 (Monday February 16 is Presidents' Day) Tuesday September 8 (Monday September 7 is Labor Day Observed) Tuesday September 22 (Monday September 21 is Rosh Hashanah) Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. CLAIMS PAID Member Kelly made a motion to approve payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated October 29, 1997, and consisting of 31 pages: General Fund $244,672.08; C.D.B.G. $18,381.35; Communications $1,289.66; Working Capital; $2,483.04; Art Center $12,227.57; Swimming Pool Fund $4,254.09; Golf Course Fund $22,036.83; Ice Arena Fund $4,336.36; Gun Range Fund $24.23; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes $20,090.35; Utility Fund $326,795.63; Storm Sewer Utility Fund $4,754.48; Recycling Program $42,121.55; Liquor Dispensary Fund $215,345.45; Construction Fund $22,797.98; Park Bond Fund $453,242.45; IMP Bond Redemption #2 $22,841.26; TOTAL $1,417,694.36. Member Maetzold seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold, Smith Motion carried. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Smith declared the meeting adjourned at 10:30 P.M. City Clerk 11 Cs c F \RPORA1 q� 1888 REPO RT /RECOM MEN RATION TO: Mayor Smith and Members of the City Council From: John Keprios, Director Park and Recreation Department Date: November 13, 1997 Subject: Public Hearing For Tree Trimming Project TT -98 In Northeast Section Of Edina. Agenda Item # _II. A. Consent X Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA X To Council Action X Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Following the Public Hearing, staff recommends approval of the Public Improvement Tree Trimming Project rT -98, which includes all boulevard trees in need of trimming in the northeast (Section #1) area of Edina. Background: At the November 3, 1997, meeting, City Council set November 17, 1997, as a Public Hearing Date for the proposed public improvement project #TT -98, which is for trimming boulevard trees in the northeast section (Section #1) of Edina. The northeast section (Section #1) is the area bounded by France Ave. to the east, 54th Street to the south, Highway 100 to the west and the City limits within those boundaries to the north. Of the 1,886 boulevard trees in Section #1, the City Forester recommends that 1,010 trees need trimming. Of these 1,010 trees, 918 of them are on private property within the City's easement and 92 trees are on City owned property. Trimming will be done to provide clearance over the street to 16 feet in height, remove dead wood and do moderate crown thinning. Notices were mailed on November 4, 1997, to all residents in Section #1 and a copy of that letter is attached to this report. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, 429.011 to 429.111 and pursuant to Edina City Code, the Council has the authority to make improvements to boulevard trees and assess the cost to.the property owner. If the City Council approves the public improvement project, the intent is to have bids ready for Council approval on Monday, December 15, 1997. is anticipated that the cost per homeowner will be approximately $60 per tree trimmed. The actual cost per ,ree is determined by the diameter at breast height (DBH), which is considered to be 4 feet from the ground. Hf NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING `�•, ,�,, a Regarding Boulevard Tree Trimming City of Edina Notice is hereby given that the Edina City Council will meet at: Edina City Hall Council Chambers 4801 West 501e Street Monday, November 17, 1997 7:00 p.m. The Edina City Council will be conducting a public hearing under the authority granted by Minnesota Statute, Chapter 429 regarding the proposed tree trimming project. PURPOSE To trim approximately 1,000 boulevard trees. Pruning and trimming will consist of crown thinning, removal of dead wood, split or cracked limbs, raise branches to at least 16 feet above street and ground surfaces. Boulevard pine and spruce trees will not be included in the trimming project, unless a clearview problem exists. PROJECT TI IE PERIOD December 1997 to April 1998. Trimming will be done during December through March. No trimming is done during the summer months to avoid tree infection and spread of disease. All boulevard trees are trimmed on and assessed basis about every six years. LOCATION The northeast section (Section i#1) is the area bounded by France Ave. to the east, 54h Street to the south, lEghway 100 to the west and the city limits within those boundaries to the north. All residents in this location will receive this notice. IF YOU DO NOT HAVE ANY BOULEVARD TREES AT YOUR ADDRESS, THIS PROJECT WELL NOT AFFECT YOU. COST An estimated cost per tree is approximately $60 depending on the size of the tree. Exact cost is figured by diameter inch of the trunk at 4 1/2 feet up from the ground (DBH) times the rate per DBH. There will be two rates, one for trees under 12 inches in diameter and one for trees over 12 inches in diameter. Rates will include 6.5% sales tax and a per tree administration fee. Only properties that have boulevard trees trimmed would be assessed for tree trimming. The cost would be assessed in the fall of 1998 with payment due in 1999. (over) City Hall (612) 927.8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55421 -1394 FAX (6121 927 - TDD (612) 927 -5461 5461 CONTACT I ask that you please call the Edina Park and Recreation Department office at 826 -0367, if one or more of the following apply: 1. If you would like to know how many trees the City is planning to trim on your boulevard. 2. If you have had any or all of your boulevard trees trimmed recently. 3. If you are planning to trim any or all of your boulevard trees before, April 1998. Many Thanks. Sincerely, John Keprios, Director Edina Park and Recreation Department CITY OF EDINA 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MN 55424 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TREE TRUVI IING PROJECT #TT -98 Notice is hereby given that the Edina City Council will meet at the Edina City Hall on Monday, November 17, 1997, at 7:00 p.m., to consider the proposed 1998 Tree Trimming project in the following area: bounded by France Ave. to the east, 54th Street to the south, Highway 100 to the west and the City limits within those boundaries to the north. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, 429.011 to 429.111. Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be heard at this meeting. Estimated total cost of the project would be approximately $60,000. The project would be funded by special assessment BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL. DEBRA MANGEN City Clerk For publication in the Edina Sun November 5 and November 12, 1997 f.. REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: Craig Larsen City Planner Date: November 17, 1997 Subject: Z -97-4, R -1, Single Dwelling Zoning District to PSR-4, Planned Senior Residence and Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Single Family to Multi - Family Residential. 7128 France Avenue South. Opus LLC and Karrington Health, Inc. Recommendation: Agenda Item 1E& Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA x❑ To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑x Resolution X❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion The Planning Commission recommends approval of Preliminary Rezoning and Amending the Comprehensive Plan to show site as Multi - Family Residential subject to: 1. Final Rezoning 2. Final Plat Approval Info /Background: Based upon suggestions received from the Planning Commission and from neighbors the proponents have prepared a revised site plan. The revised site plan makes the following changes: • The building is moved to the east and south as far as possible while maintaining the required setbacks. • The pond area is moved from the south side to the northwest comer of the site. • Additional berming is provided along the westerly property line. The berm is adjacent to the three homes on Lynmar Lane. • The parking and drive aisle areas have been modified. DRAFT MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION HELD ON WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 29, 1997 MEMBERS IN ATENDANCE: Lonsbury, Swenson, Byron, McClelland, Runyan, Workinger, Ingwalson, Bergman Johnson II. OLD BUSINESS: Z -97-4 Rezoning R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District to PSR-4, Planned Residence District Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Generally Located: West of France Avenue and south of Hazelton Road Ms. Aaker informed the Commission the subject property measures 4.18 acres in area and is developed as a church. The church ceased operating in the summer of 1997. The proposed rezoning would allow redevelopment of the site as a senior citizen assisted living residence. The proposed development would also require amending the Comprehensive Plan land use designation for the site from Single family Residential to Multi- family Residential. The proposed rezoning would allow development of the site with a 3 story assisted living, senior citizen residence containing 93 units. A zoning Ordinance evaluation of the proposed development follows: Ms. Aaker explained the PSR-4 district requires a lot area of 1,500 square per dwelling unit. The proposed 93 unit building provides 1,957 square feet per unit, and thus complies with ordinance density limits. Ms. Aaker said the required building setbacks in the PSR-4 district are 35 feet or the height of the building, if greater from all property lines. The proposed building has a height of 40 feet, thus 40 feet is the required setback. The proposed setbacks, which vary from 70 to 130 feet, greatly exceed ordinance minimums. The largest setback, 130 feet, is at the westerly property line along Lynmar Lane. Ms. Aaker pointed out traffic generation and traffic patterns were major issues when this site was earlier proposed for office development. Staff has asked Karrington, the owner - operator of the facility, to provide information about occupancy and staffing in order to understand the impacts of the development. Karrington operates 24 similar developments in other parts of the country. In those 24 developments only one resident has a car. Peak staffing for the facility would be 28 staffers. Based on this information staff would expect minimal traffic impact on the adjacent neighborhood, and would expect the 55 parking spaces would adequately handle staff and visitor parking demand. In addition, unlike earlier proposals, the only access to the site would be from Hazelton Road, which should reduce the desirability of using West 72nd Street for site access. Ms. Aaker asked the Commission to note that although not required for Preliminary Rezoning review, the proponents have submitted a full landscaping plan and schedule. The proposed plan, which saves much of the existing material along France Avenue, exceeds ordinance requirements. Ms. Aaker reported the proponents held a neighborhood meeting on October 14, to explain the project and collect neighborhood input. As a result of that meeting the proponents are making adjustments to the site plan which will affect the pond and the parking area west of the building. Ms. Aaker concluded staff believes the proposed development to an excellent solution to reuse of this site in terms of land use, intensity and traffic. This low rise, low intensity use provides an excellent transition between Commercial uses to the east and the low density residential neighborhood to the west. Staff recommends approval of the Comprehensive Plan amendment, and Preliminary Rezoning subject to the following conditions: 1. Final Rezoning 2. Watershed District Permits Ms. Julie Kimball, representing Opus was present to respond to questions also present was Mr. Michael Concilla, representing Karrington Health, Inc. Ms. Kimball introduced herself and told the Commission Opus and Karrington Health, Inc. have teamed up to develop a number of senior assisted living communities. Continuing, Ms. Kimball explained the development team held a neighborhood meeting on October 14, 1997, which was well attended. At the meeting concerns were expressed regarding the proposed pond, and the suggestion of moving the building more toward France Avenue. Ms. Kimball explained at this time the development team is unclear if a pond will be required on this site. She informed the Commission a development of this size requires a "nurp" pond, but because of the subject site's close proximity to the Edinborough /Centennial Lakes development there is a possibility of tying the storm water run -off from this site into the existing system. Ms. Kimball said at this time that decision is up to the Watershed District. 2 Mr. Concilla introduced himself and told the Commission the development team is looking into the - possibility of moving the building -more toward France Avenue. He explained to the Commission the reason building. placement is located as depicted is because along France Avenue there are a number of mature trees the team would like preserved. Continuing; Mr. Concilla informed the Commission the building is a three wing structure.with each.wing consisting of a "different, neighborhood The facility is top quality, and will contain common areas- for each "neighborhood" beauty parlor, craft areas, outdoor areas, etc. Mr. Concilla said'the structure will contain 93 units with 11.1 beds, adding there will be some shared rooms for married couples, or'others. Mr. Coricilla described the building as a three. wing off-set structure that will reduce building mass impact. He reported the development team is working with the neighbors on building materials, adding the buildings exterior will: be constructed with high quality materials. Mr. Concilla concluded stating in his opinion this type of facility will not introduce much traffic into the neighborhood. Chairman Johnson said in his opinion a pond would be a desirable amenity for the residents of the facility and neighborhood. Mr. Concilla responded there is a concern for safety of our vulnerable residents, those with Alzheimer's; and children in the neighborhood. Commissioner McClelland asked Mr.. Concilla his definition of assisted living. Mr. Concilla said the residents of the facility may need help bathing, dressing, or help eating. He stated there are no kitchen facilities in the rooms. Continuing, Mr. Concilla,said the average resident is a 83 year old female that needs minimal assistance, but requires some. Mr. Concilla added one wing of the facility is'reserved for Alzheimer's patients. Commissioner McClelland asked Mr. Concilla how the facility is "rented ". Mr. Concilla said there are daily to monthly rates. Commissioner McClelland asked -the square footage of the rooms. Mr. Concilla said the rooms will be between 200 -600 square feet. Commissioner Byron asked Mr. Concilla if this is the first-venture Karrington Health has had in Minnesota. Mr. Concilla said that is "correct. He added Karrington recently purchased Minnesota based Kensington, Inc., and will manage those facilities. 'Commissioner Byron asked if this is a licensed facility. Mr. Concilla said the facility will be licensed by the State of Minnesota. Commissioner Runyan asked if vehicles will be provided to take the residents of the facility shopping, etc. 'Mr. Concilla said vehicles are provided for field trips, shopping trips, doctor appointments, etc. 3 Commissioner'Swenson asked how the cost of this facility compares with the cost of other assisted living facilities. Mr. Concilla said ,this facility will, run between $65.00 to, $135.00 per day, depending on'the care required. Commissioner Workinger.asked for information on visitor traffic, and. delivery vehicles. Mr. Concilla said all deliveries will be handled by.panel trucks, there will be no large semi- trucks delivering to the facility. The :trip generation.for visitors and other forms of providers is calculated to be around 160 trips per day. Commissioner Bergman asked if the building will have security.. Mr. Concilla explained the building-will have two levels of security. All will have a key pad code system to 'exit.' -The Alzheimee.s wing is more secure with the patients always monitored, and some will. be required. to wear security bracelets. Commissioner Ingwalson asked if this facility is private pay. Mr. Concilla said that is correct. Commissioner Ingwalson questioned if a.resident has been in the facility for some time, and runs out of funds what would happen. Mr. Concilla said there is a scholarship program where assistance is given. Continuing,; Mr: Concilla explained 80% of the residents of the facility will pass with us, with the rest moving on to a nursing home facility or hospice. Commissioner Bergman in response to neighborhood request to move the . structure more toward France Avenue asked where:the corner of the existing church is in comparison to the new building. Mr. Concilla said the existing church is 53 feet from France Avenue, and the closest point of the new building is 70 feet from France Avenue. - Ms. Kimball interjected at present the development team is looking at repositioning the building to either match the setback of the existing church or be 50 feet from France Avenue. Mr. Mark Sullivan, 7128 Lynmar Lane told the Commission when he purchased his home he thought he would always be living across from a church, but that is now not the case. Continuing, Mr. Sullivan said he has been impressed with the response from Opus and Karrington in terms of their working. with the. neighborhood. Mr. Sullivan said he is pleased with the proposed use of the site, but does have a number'of concerns: 1) the structure.is too tall, we would like it to match, the. height of Lutheran Church of the Master. 2) the neighborhood wants the building moved closer to France Avenue. 3) we want some assurance that no new wings, or new floors. will be added in the future if this is approved. 4): neighbors have a concern regarding drainage. 5) transition, is.an issue and the residents on Lynmar Lane would like an easement along Lynmar lane to screen the building, and parking area. 6)- immediate neighbors want the grade of the parking lot lowered to prevent the lights from cars shining into the homes on Lynmar Lane. Mr. Sullivan concluded reiterating the n W development team has been very responsive to the neighbors, and the neighborhood supports the proposed use of the site. Ms. Sue Deweiss, 7100 Bristol Boulevard said she has a concern regarding the pond, and the possibility of an increase in mosquitoes. She added she would like more garden area, not a pond. Commissioner Ingwalson asked Ms. Aaker if this site is rezoned today, could they expand in the future without our approval. Ms. Aaker said any expansion would require a hearing before the Commission and Council. Commissioner Bergman said she has a concern with traffic stacking at the signaled intersection at France Avenue, and suggested that the traffic light be extended. Commissioner Byron said as he understands it, the discussion is still ongoing regarding the pond, and movement of the building, etc., and asked Mr. Concilla where they are in the discussion with the neighborhood and Watershed. Mr. Concilla said the building will be moved closer to France Avenue, but it is important to the team to save the trees, adding the exact setback has not been determined. Regarding expansion in the future, the structure is a steel frame building which makes in difficult to expand. Mr. Concilla said our facilities have always been small, so no future expansion is planned. In reference to the pond, the team is still working with the Watershed District. Mr. Concilla told the Commission the team is also working with the neighborhood on berm height, and lighting, adding, lights will be shielded, and focused toward the facility, with small Mailbu lights in the garden areas. Concluding, Mr. Concilla said the height of the building is as low as we can go, and can not be compromised. Commissioner Runyan interjected in his opinion if the building height were reduced to the height of the church the charm of the building would be compromised, and would take on the feel of a commercial building versus the proposed residential feel of the building. Mr. Concilla agreed, adding the goal of the team was to achieve a building that had a residential feel and look, he also pointed out if the building was reduced in height green space would be lost as the building expands outward. Ms. Kimball told the Commission she appreciates the support of the neighborhood, and the development team will continue to work with them to achieve the best building and grounds. Commissioner Byron said he can support the proposal. He added ,the developer has mentioned they are not advocates of the pond, but by law water run-off must now be contained on site, and the developer, neighborhood and Commission will have to wait to see what the Watershed District rules. k, Commissioner Swenson stated she supports the project, and is in favor of moving the building toward France Avenue, adding she would like to see as many of the mature trees saved as possible if the structure is moved. Commissioner Ingwalson said in his opinion this site is begging for redevelopment, and this proposal has the support of the neighborhood, noting their mentioned concerns. Commissioner Ingwalson moved to recommend Preliminary Rezoning approval subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Swenson seconded the motion. Commissioner Byron interjected procedurally this is moved forward to the Council for Preliminary Rezoning approval, but it should be noted the next phase is for Final Rezoning, and at that time all the issues raised at this hearing should be resolved. Commissioner Byron encouraged the proponents to continue working with the neighborhood to achieve a quality development and address the concerns expressed this evening to the best of their ability. Concluding, Commissioner Byron said he is in favor of the motion, and supports the proposal. Ayes; Lonsbury, Swenson, McClelland, Bergman, Byron, Ingwalson, Workinger, Runyan, Johnson. Motion for preliminary rezoning approval carried. 9 -0. c LOCATION MAP' 111 � ■■ ON MMIM ■a .: ._ :! , y - ■- -ten . _M ins MIN rMat 04 01MAJ L REZONING NUMBER Z -97 -4 & Amendment to Comprehensive Plan LOCATION - 7128 France Avenue South (Lutheran Church of the Master) REQUEST Construct Senior Citizen Assisted Living Residence EDINA PLANNING D EPARTMENT EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT OCTOBER 29, 1997 Z -97-4 Rezoning R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District to PSR-4, Planned Residence District St Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Generally Located: West of France Avenue and south of Hazelton Road The subject property measures 4.18 acres in area and is developed as a church. The church ceased operating in the summer of 1997. The proposed rezoning would allow redevelopment of the site as a senior citizen assisted living residence. The proposed development would also require amending the Comprehensive Plan land use designation for the site from Single family Residential to Multi- family Residential. The proposed rezoning would allow development of the site with a 3 story assisted living, senior citizen residence containing 93 units. A zoning Ordinance evaluation of the proposed development follows: Density The PSR-4 district requires a lot area of 1,500 square per dwelling unit. The proposed 93 unit building provides 1,957 square feet per unit, and thus complies with ordinance density limits. 'Setbacks- Required building setbacks in the PSR-4 district are 35 feet or the height of the building, if greater from all property lines. The proposed building has a height of 40 feet, thus 40 feet is the required setback. The proposed setbacks, which vary from 70 to 130 feet, greatly exceed ordinance minimums. The largest setback, 130 feet, is at the westerly property line along Lynmar Lane. Parking and Traffic Traffic generation and traffic patterns were major issues when this site was earlier proposed for office development. Staff has asked Karrington, the owner - operator of the facility, to provide information about occupancy and staffing in order to understand the impacts of the development. Karrington operates 24 similar developments in other parts of the country. In those 24 developments only one resident has a car. Peak staffing for the facility would be 28 staffers. Based on this information staff would expect minimal traffic impact on the adjacent neighborhood, and would expect the 55 parking spaces would adequately handle staff and visitor parking demand. In addition, unlike earlier proposals, the only access to the site would be from Hazelton Road, which should reduce the desirability of using West 72nd Street for site access. Although not required for Preliminary Rezoning review, the proponents have submitted a full landscaping plan and schedule. The proposed plan, which saves much of the existing material along France Avenue, exceeds ordinance requirements. The proponents held a neighborhood meeting on October 14, to explain the project and collect neighborhood input. As a result of that meeting the proponents are making adjustments to the site plan which will affect the pond and the parking area west of the building. Staff has not reviewed these changes. It is our understanding that the developer will present the revised plan to the Commission at their meeting. Recommendation Staff believes the proposed development to an excellent solution to reuse of this site in terms of land use, intensity and traffic. This low rise, low intensity use provides an excellent transition between Commercial uses to the east and the low density residential neighborhood to the west. Staff recommends approval of the Comprehensive Plan amendment, and Preliminary Rezoning subject to the following conditions: 1. Final Rezoning 2. Watershed District Permits Opus National, L.L.C. w ® OPUS 700 Opus Center Mailing Address 0 ® 9900 Bren Road East P.O. Box 59110 Minnetonka, Minnesota 55343 -9600 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55459 -0110 612 - 936 -4600 Fax 612 - 936 -9808 November 14, 1997 Mr. Craig Larson City of Edina via messenger 4801 West 50"' Street Edina, MN 55424 Subject: Opus /Karrington Assisted Living Project Hazelton & France Avenue Dear Craig: As per your request enclosed are sixteen (16) additional sets of the submittal that was previously made to the planning commission with an additional sheet which shows changes which Opus would incorporate into the final submittal if we are approved Monday night. These changes include moving the pond to the lowest point on the site which is at the corner of Hazelton and Lynmar, moving the building closer to France Avenue (requested by the neighbors) and re- designing the front drive entry to an oval rather than a circle. I believe that we are still preserving quite a few of the trees along France Avenue with this plan. We researched off -site stormwater retention but found that installation of a new lateral would be required in France Avenue which would be too costly and disruptive as six lanes would need to be crossed. Also, we do not believe that Hennepin County would be overly supportive of digging up portions of France Avenue. We have continued to meet with a small group of the neighbors regarding their input on the landscaping plan and we will have another meeting soon. I believe that process is going very well and that they have had some constructive input to improve the plan. Architects, Contractors, Developers Opus National, L.L.C. is an affiliate of the Opus group of companies Atlanta, Chicago, Columbus, Dallas, Denver, Ft. Lauderdale, Houston, Milwaukee, Minneapolis, Orange County, Orlando, Pensacola, Phoenix, Sacramento, San Francisco, Seattle, Tampa, Washington D.C. OR OPUS. Mr. Craig Larson November 14.1997 Page two If we receive city council approval on November 17`h we would hope to make a submittal for final project approval by December 5`h which is the date the watershed submittal would be required. We would then present the final submittal to the planning commission on January 7 and to the city council on January 20' if that meets with your approval. The final submittal is as we discussed contingent upon receiving confirmation that the State would not incorrectly categorize this project as something other than an assisted living project. Would you please send me an agenda for Monday night when it is complete? Both Mike Concilla of Karrington and myself will be at the meeting. Thank you. Sincerely, J ie A. Kimble I Real Estate Development cc: Mike Concilla Dan Boie Joe Elizondo Jack Crocker John Kuehn f s a E d 1t — — — — — WELTON —ROAD — — — — — — — I I I I I I J I I I I 1 n _a eTREET — - - - - - - - - WEST- 7�-E,Q- o,1,�� - - - - - - R � t Q U W Z Q ' Z I I f r n p ® SCHEME A OPTION 2 I I I I I . �TWTIC Loa (m.) Goo OPUS® OPUS Architects k Engineers, Inc 700 Opus Center 9900 Bren Road East Minnetonka, Minitimto 55343 612 - 936 -4660 Fax 612- 935 -1366 m 1997 OPUS Architects a Er4wri. Inc. N rights neare& This doommt is on indn m A of selrice and a UM propaly of OPUS Architects 4 Engineers, Inc., em mar not be used or copied hmd prior wAtm c L REGIsnuum RE\Ba6 OC9a1 NAM 1137.044 PRO•m useln am 0/8/97 Poo= Yvvw naI to aCKM Iff EUZONOO KAF#MTON OF EDM Locklitoll EO01A , MINNESOTA 911111 >mt SITE PLAN 11--- A I POND 12 ou SE TRA91 AND e SERVICE AREA 4 I II II• I I i'll4 •n.l � •111111 I, 111•; IPillu!.I. II''ll •'�i I, /III' Illyll,�l� III I III'1411111111'Ill II �,II III • • II111111 / • III, PROPOSED BUILDING II I EOUItITARD "'+u 3 STORY I II 1e 1e l Ar SE I COlmrcum AREA III ,� "'hI 'iilll,lllp \♦ // lllp� \ / •1111 E I' 'P b n _a eTREET — - - - - - - - - WEST- 7�-E,Q- o,1,�� - - - - - - R � t Q U W Z Q ' Z I I f r n p ® SCHEME A OPTION 2 I I I I I . �TWTIC Loa (m.) Goo OPUS® OPUS Architects k Engineers, Inc 700 Opus Center 9900 Bren Road East Minnetonka, Minitimto 55343 612 - 936 -4660 Fax 612- 935 -1366 m 1997 OPUS Architects a Er4wri. Inc. N rights neare& This doommt is on indn m A of selrice and a UM propaly of OPUS Architects 4 Engineers, Inc., em mar not be used or copied hmd prior wAtm c L REGIsnuum RE\Ba6 OC9a1 NAM 1137.044 PRO•m useln am 0/8/97 Poo= Yvvw naI to aCKM Iff EUZONOO KAF#MTON OF EDM Locklitoll EO01A , MINNESOTA 911111 >mt SITE PLAN 11--- A I ORIGINAL PROPOSAL SUBMITTED TO PLANNING COMMISSISON �� 700 Opus Center Mailing Address ® m 9900 Bren Road East P.O. Box 59110 Minnetonka, Minnesota 55343 -9500 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55459 -0110 612- 936 -4600 Fax 612- 936 -9808 October 15, 1997 Mr. Craig Larson City of Edina 4801 West Fiftieth Street Edina. Minnesota 55424 Subject: Application for Rezoning Preliminary- Concept Review Dear Mr. Larson: Enclosed for your review and consideration please find an application and the applicable submittal documents for a proposed rezoning and preliminary concept review for the property at 7128 France Avenue South. A check is enclosed in the amount of $1,200 for the comprehensive plan amendment and rezoning processes. It is our understanding that no re- platting or subdivision will be necessary. ` Opus National and Karrington Health are proposing a three story, 9' ) unit assisted living residence. This facility would provide housing and care for the elderly. The Karrington residences are designed with residential architecture and attractive landscaping with an objective to fit into the surrounding neighborhood. This product type is typically a very low traffic generator when compared with other product types such as retail or office. We have held one meeting with the neighborhood (October 14) and will use appropriate suggestions from this meeting to implement into our final submittal. We believe that we have alreadv addressed a variety of issues which we believe to be important, these are highlighted below: ® Ingress and egress to the site is solely off of Hazelton Road. 0 The southerly boundary of the site is bermed and landscaped to provide screening. ® We have provided for on site stormwater detention. ® We have retained existing trees, wherever possible, along the northerly boundary of the site. Architects. Contractors. Develooers v " wauuua:. L,.L.I,, is an mime(@ 01 Ine upus group at companies Atlanta, Chicago, Columbus. Dallas, Denver, Ft. Lauderdale, Houston, Milwaukee, Minneapolis, Orange County. Orlando. Pensacola, Phoenix, Sacramento, San Francisco. Seattle, Tamca, Washington D.C. OPUS. Mr. Craig Larson October 15, 1997 Page two Also included for your information are some examples of other Karrington projects throughout the country. Opus and Karrington are partnering to provide a first class development in the City of Edina. We respectfully request your consideration and support of this project and ask that it be placed on the next available planning commission agenda of October 29, 1997. Please feel free to contact me with any questions or comments. We look forward to working with you. Thank you. Sincerely, i Ju ie A. Kimble erector Real Estate Development enclosures cc: Andrew Weeks Michael Concilla Pat Dadv Joe Elizondo Jack Crocker John Kuehn X44 ko► Old' 4w Vt 'fiCr��y; t ,•i� ,�M .T 1 e �v q ,m d �• T • .II ' 1 �''• /.asp w:�l r♦ 7�' n yM -1 Wu {j�ra +L�fiNtJ, 1r�•� �{[�r. I: it iF:'e+ ? %)Iw' e;' .I� :� F: �.i.Lt..:- .:..._ T _ — f�.v:p ,.' .�h ' ' •''r�''1 E if7 + b•'!r .` e y� C i r+ Al'b ... ' .,rte^"' i• dot �i� ,! • O ull ti y 2 KARRI NGTON OF EDINA EDINA, MN I October 13, 1997 I Project Information PROPOSED USE GROSS SITE AREA GROSS FLOOR AREA BUILDING FOOTPRINT AREA BUILDING SETBACKS FRONT SIDE INTERIOR SIDE YARD REAR YARD PROPOSEDYARD FRONT SIDE REAR HEIGHT REQUIREMENT. BUILDING HEIGHT NO OF RESIDENCE UNITS: DENSITY OF RESIDENTIAL USE PARKING PROVIDED SCREENING ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY 182039 SF (4.18 AC) 64,000 SF 22,500 SF 35 35 20 35 100 VARIES 70 -130' 80 PSR-4 3 STORIES OR 40' 40 93 UNITS 93 LRJITS1182,039SF = 1,957 SF 55 SPACES COMPLETELY SCREENED SERVICE 8 DELIVERY AREA T 0 30 60 120 II li I1 IS EM \ 3 � � corTet +� n Hole .FRle.rr I - AsTRaI nax ro H MIIee I I wNO Nu+Lr wu CNPl. 5 �: iR:'+Tennoo s� -. tv�lPaaJ HJ - -� % I A Z. L L / L// V \ / moral ro elm io�q //- \ H s w.y.de era 25 oeursuloe�o sr°°DrwxeNys' .[ALN r v -�—/- 3 / n� r.� • Iola AP PROPERTY LINE - 5 S D\ 7 SM _ _ II - FIlNrM Mxnsx �_ I 4 ,. j Few FLr�c r osrN - . L I 8 volsna® a - LO►KTt9 •A4 HJ O PS Lw 23 a rwvo swwce 1 OD reR 1-.r ROD Ti.p .ur 3 I ,y S 1 EXISTI G LAWN TAT+eN \ � IlmllM® Oe I�rKT !d1- -� 1 I eb' -0' \ C �J• I AB I � Pwv�m a�.sKe a w..Tea loll D la �I - -- --- - -c - 55 sERVICe � � glg 41 III" SOD D I \ TREE 6 I_r. RPmMET. li IIOD LF. P9tIi -!TE)i LIKE/40-42.1 OR 49 TRIMS RCOIINID O EAST1N6 O/E EIToRY TREES SmO.M To REMAIN.40 TRIMS D 1d 1 .i'I• pRDpO5® OVERSTORY TRIMS r WM.45 TRIMS ZITY fttL. &4.GRS tuft MAKE FINAL ALLOKA. _P FOR E9I5TN6 4 -/sO� I�1 I's. ]4' NI6N OR 6REATCR BLDG. REOUIFIMM . (31-06 2 TY"W AP D 1 V� �O I 42 ORNAMENTAL oS x 45 . 3J5 . S DEG'DU015 EvEtibRE_"I / lO Gyp ACXZNT ¢11TARY� x ASS. to-M ; 15 - ] V]• 1.1 e' Nr. 5 V2' GAL 43 43 • N ARY .20 X 45 . EO . , - 4 I/]• CAL. b• ,R. SOD 1 !�� 4 FLU .20 X 45 . Ed . , -5 I(i' CAL_ IY NT. I I PLANT LIST EN .5 'RIMS 01SWRm 42' FENCE S 1 S D 1 / / �// °• Q I EXISTIIR,jIG KEY Dr'r COMMON ..LAIN NAMES sI ROOT REMARKS AW ts� `O� AA 3 AUTUMN PURPLE A5N 2 -1li' GAL B.B. 51NISLE. STRAIGHT LEADER 'Q /jj 70' -0• 7 2 Pr Iruf orMr'cdlo 'AU4.rrIR -DI 3 -I/§ GAL CROTCHES C ��. O IMPERIK HONEYLOGLIST 4 -1li' GAL. B.B. 51N6LE. STRAIGHT LE/ 7� I a 1 \) V. 4% RL 3 GRED ItMOND LINDA/ Vlerinro 'Imperl2 -1/2' GAL. B.B. SINGLE, STRAG6HT LE/V7.R r.�( Tlb . e1KJlbre NO V' GROTCMES SD I e II O 183 RM 3 RED 5UNSET RED MAPLE 3 -I/2' GAL. B.B. SINGLE. STRAIGHT LEADER 1 1 D 2 I �Lbrvn Red Svost' 4-Irj• GAL. NO V' CROTCHES SUGAR MAPLE �• GAL. B.B. SINGLE. STRA16N7 LEA7E.R AW II ` 4 Kr foc I-- 2z2' GAL. NO V' CROTCHES =0 3 3 i/2' GAL •Tj• I AM 6 AM1R MAPLE 1- 111yrs.n) D' HT. B.B. 110 BRANCHES BELOW 36' HT 32 O. Acer Nn010 SMALI.E5T LEADER I -I/: •C. TA SD I RB T LAVER BIRCH r Itly 15' HT. B.B. NO BRANCHES BELOW 36' HT tieerl bra SMALLEST LEADER 1 -I/2' G. III• 1 12 PS 14 PINK SPIRE CRABAPPLE I -1/2' GAL. B.B. NO BRANCH RFI nW 36 -T. 2B II, a AJ Maly! sp Frxc So e' SINGLE STRAIGHT LEACER 8G I 5D S SNOrmRI FT CRABAPP•..E 1 -1/2' CAL. B.B. NO BRANGNES BELOW 56 HT Mo1yf !o 'O wo-ue' SINGLE. 5TRAIGHT_t FADER / OD 1 I DO 55 35 SPRING SNOW GRABAPPL_ I -1rj' GAL. B.B. NO BRANCHES BE 10W 36 HT 5 I 6D 1 bREYTYU6 DOGWOOD veer D' HT. B.B. NO eRZ MES BELOFI ¢HT Cc— raslroso 511,16LE STRAIGHT LEADER GS T• Irr. FENCE Pp 2 P D' HT. B.B. NO BRANCHES BE-OW 36' Hr 1ee arey! I C dlteml /Olb SINGLE 5TRAIG O HT LEAER a ' PH c INI AP 2 Al/r TR1AN PINE 6' HT. B.B. FULL FORH TO GRADE RL $y�!' a C \ I PIrN nit3ra D' MT. "~ ON (SOD �J 2 10' MT I 12• Hr. EM GS 1 COLORADO 5P.eJCE 6" MT' BB. FULL FORM TO GRADE 4 / 2 PI.— Pln9— D' MT. AA - b 3 10 HT. B.B. 2' HT. PS BC, 26 COMPACT BURNING BIfH 30- T. CONT. MIN. 5 DANES a 30' HT. Evor.nmyf alatys 'C ta' GS I I 4— I $ I BM 30 BU'SN HONE'r5UCK1= ID' HT. CONT. MIN. 5 DANES a ID HT. — EMER L bnlcera EM 55 EMERALD MCUtm HONEYSUCKLE 10' HT. CONT. MIN. 5 LANES a ID' Hr. LQ"—. 10lLO✓n Mena' AW 56 ANTHONY AATEREFUA^j SPIRE^ ID' MT. CANT. MIN. OF $ CANE5 AT 10• Hr, rasa bPnoldd 'M eVOterer' NO EMtA.NGMES BE10W %- MT — — S _ —North TA 55 TELHt1Y GLOBE ARBOR ITAE 30 MT. COW. IAI TE «Lltlent011f TK 5G 35 6REQ1 JRIIPER 24• DIA. COM. Vy. ,ee,w ae, SCALE I "= O' B4 .74- VIA. CONT. uwsrxe ew„ALra r..:1- y:r* ,� •w so .w.n! rw� x •.e:a •1-,n r.rR .o ...¢ _ :.[a o .0 nee . i +o .la s TLC e!' rn ,m, ro ss.nr.e so ro eeroe ��, u�.y:r .! raw a .•e w� N91rwn o !e ol. •n s. „� • r,Ki Q � AJ IZ ARCADIA JJNIPER 24' DIA CONT. eQR -,.ncr .wHwya wr. an: r..u:...,m�o er Nolan ,: uYS :r®.I+a.we ;-ec wra 'a •ewe 3 10 cam *M.e _�--- w,ureLr RsaL,e r•e..4 w nn.e New, �w:Hr .er. a.e eeaoys� _ ns+ .enberuf wbHO 'MLOdb' - ro JY IT JAPANESE Wt . SPREADING YEW 74' VIA. CONT. SD 55 cwe !%or.oarm:r ..,.v.! v.+vcra cw.lmn+ule wr.. �.�.oa .•.••.ww wy 'rel4p'., r'M"re.. -ea-r KAX c60NIAo tblo' nn.L rtiDw L •w,o - �n-calµ Nun wrw+w �'+Im Y� n� L M nL� ua.e!! one,ns .m+eo w _!.. IA FROM FLATS mix O 0' /PI e--- L,vsl a nANrl.f eR9 �o we w •�w..es� .�.- .eav'.� As ra.,ole. w�•s .I¢w! +cr .s er.a.o- 436 WAX BE60N 71 l 54 120 56 �LO.FLe'm n i"'sa'A2 "d` }ra wv ^w.� •w,ws - oa BO la se rllaem HI% OF RED/PINK �� sJxy w.Z o-]o- 4,wNaAe �QwA.l .iww�! vm 1 IIb I ATIENS FROM FLATS SPADE D' O.L. E AL yrpy rp�nLrplyy:[•eIe¢ Qr�iK.r. e• 0�_u.y MIX PINKS, YWITE SALMON ire+.! Qbgdf W,• Or .! P.1-, ,,,. .tn TO Ia>g L.,e M !:R• w 1yLe, n,OW .CANT w, MT 0 (� ->yPL .„ ITlXJ[Ilnf bllerPTO RE1 BB PA SH . LovT,wcra To :oe+n.• w.1- A�La- ..v. s.w rm wT.. >«:w -u os ul, •e, a -!• rx :� or< LwN / l.lora use, caxowra weea rm. l�o:LS�•o n< so.0 v TI+s ro.rc, aeww woe � AB 532 APRICOT BEAUTY TULIPS BULB SPACE D' O.L. 1 !• urea noon ur a T.e .,Lne,Tr. ro �eww. 1-w, ro ur.. �eAw ,o Lehr "� !""� s ro ee n.v..m nI 1p0 'AN. Icot BePltN' oR Noss ��, ro b,Ly nRUF LIU!_ WST•, e O w.eLew,yn YnC,.wMN. n w r M cw � ./+n e ��Nx iY oww.e e , r4 w«nn. . .w.G.Twa .e .:! . +er nr ®ro ao "N }'li a Tuom.e ! n o"u'O o we"NOS Os.f , , wwi w,e w.o n u,[,�. wK r w..,wm T w� P+K•w t / .AwroY'.»r .e e E 12 OZ. PA 120 FUMILA A5TILBE 6' VIA. CONT. 5PAL T 156 50 f GhVMN BB 54 EIRZ5 51146MAM BEAUTY ASTILBE b' VIA. CONT. SPACE ID' O.G. bD AL L W � .CLAN o• •...+! w« .roeN. oN o.. r � 4:00 oorry rw. ae� .a.s �,o r ra.,K, rs.wNm1! Mxru¢ o+'N :e,. waL Tw.e .mcoevr ,wrr ro n.•e+ns Ny .L.eu r+ wnecs .: arm... �em. AsUIM BresttichPn Bsouty. .esr cw -a�.o ,ei...v �s.e Hnoe awu•+ r.c:.r of 50 10b STELLA DE ORO DAYLILY &' VIA. COW. SPACE ID O.G. 2� �. ro r.�,•e:w ��i !- oa•.} u: xr -o w our +ev .o o e..L� ee .a.a.ww wo. so• . sae�.z -� o• zv.T tl,AJ. u•o +xLnw q:.• „e1 wmer «eallb Ste 11a De Q•o' r ti w.ICA.ro, f,•,r e. .e _ wo..nA.c: •o ..e ca.TOw . roM as CA 200CATHERINE YIODOBERY DAYLILY 6' VIA. CONT. SPACE 16.O.L. Hi T!r o�m. A M .�•L', Lw1. tine w..,oywL w .wK Nw.ee,D .Own w Yo•s! ^ WnrraLallif 'GOtNar.11 FbOLbeN _ a,.+o.lm .a weee. s,xc »c+yuw - .w.. -.. w,vawL rw.: Las..+m son r w1- m s*rco "no "e e,a.m u .ew.• .ernum . LUn n.i.:r:� GG 106 CHILA60 SOLD DiRKE DAYLILY 6' VIA. CONT. SPACE ID O.G. 0. ^ - wssN v +as..o. Tg .,n -rLra wn. ..e rse v •lee ,.e wsn.r runes LATH .,r, ., r.w�L to ��N e.i �,� 7i Few Rot s' oval 3 - ,nw, uWL owHwx ro ,s�,� .n, /wen •.IwN •.e rx o ,vra ro ....• v u• .a:a ; IbnMr0c0111s 'GAlcoc)O G:p1tl SV 11w' s:a w-4e ros .,orec>t� n+arP�O'L "'0 "YrOn O'wo'^O ww .w,.uwm�. AL 186 A5IATIG HYBRID LILIE5 6'121A. GOVT. SPACE 12 O.G. EMAIL Mix O Lwn.s onn+•an ., .o Tor ro ne ro .•L.eeu. v.w.- •a .woe ..se lr.wisa a .Cr ..mn -. YeL.LOW/PINK/6,OLD/ft4I _h"r., '. - Sr„1 Lu+c a ro iN wNa neo n[s !.•.�. �e ou L11LnI w .e�. ,w•ea.:� ,eroNO e. >wr may .eow yNy .o � 56 51EBOLOIANAHOrTA 6•DIA- CONT. 5H °i"�M� n.e yeL:.o o•.e.- ..o ..Ne No r uso•ues wu .ws > ��. ®�,ar� .o Nofta lleboldlrne .o.L�.r2 � s Ke +:n•� t�sea e'+e, ��s w y =a D DAYLILY MIX 6- DIA. CONT. o.e, a xu. raw l. �.i eo.ea ,+. • 1,4�,!" Equal mli of Steno De Oro. 011eoyo bole 9Mnu aTe LoB+arw noodUery y, wur•w!e �ZgY..e LIyONtlef of eoen faeGllf Ore RNen N W LgOya IIf[. OPUS; OPUS Architects k Engineers, h:c. t it 700 Opus Center y 9900 Bren Road East Minnetonka, Minnesota 55343 612- 935 -4660 Fa: 612- 935 -1365. O 1996 OPUS lvcNl"ts 6 Engineers. Inc N rghb « 1,ed, IN, IccvMenl a m istru I d sense m4 a Ire vm" d OPUS NcNlects A Eng;neers. Inc.. vd mM rot be used a ccped .0.A per d1m C-1. ERr'LST ASSOCIATES _ RIPIS 6 10/14/97 18901 e� M37_ON WE 10/09/97 alr:.N BI LNEOtm� GFE PRUCT KARPoNGTON OF EDINA LocAM. EOINA. MINCE'NESOOTAA LANDSCAPE E 1 LAN (PROCAESS DWOL) SH[[T Nu1rBEN �� 1 I Agenda Item III. A. 7016 Bristol Blvd. Edina, MN 55435 Tele. # 927 -7907 November 16, 1996 City Hall Planning Department 4801 West 5& Street Edina, MN 55424 RE: Opus, National LLC and Karrington Health, Inc., Case File # Z -97 -4 To the Members of the Planning Department: We agree, for the most part, to the proposed rezoning and redevelopment of the property now occupied by Lutheran Church of the Master, at 7128 France Avenue South. The proposal, as we understand it, is a significant improvement over the Pinehurst proposal. It provides a reasonable buffer between the commercial zone of France Avenue and our neighborhood. It does seem to have little, traffic impact to our neighborhood. Our concerns, with recommendations, are: • The building seems too close to our neighborhood and should be as close as possible to France Avenue. • The traffic can still travel through our neighborhood and needs the approaches pointed only to France Avenue. • The outside mechanical equipment will create noise (fans, blowers, compressors, etc.) and should be buffered. • The property is still not a home and thus it should be buffered with berming, trees and plantings between the building, parking lot and our neighborhood. • The building height is too high and should be limited to 2 stories, on our neighborhood side. We are in favor of development of this property, assuming our concerns are addressed. We ask that you resolve our concerns of the current Opus, National LLC and Karringtion Health LLC before you approve the proposal. Thank You, Richard Ste' Marianne Rother ;� qNAA" y V- - - Iii REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: David A. Velde City Sanitarian Date: November 17, 1997 Subject: Grant First Reading to Ordinance No. 1997 -17. Regulating the Sale and Use of Tobacco Products. Recommendation: Agenda Item # iv. B. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ❑x To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution 0 Ordinance ❑ Discussion Grant first reading to Ordinance No. 1997 -17, repealing Section 1325 of the City Code and replacing it with a new Section 1326 regulating the sale and use of tobacco products. Info /Background: The Minnesota Legislature passed a law during the 1997 legislative session which requires the licensing of retail tobacco sales, mandates annual compliance checks of the licensed facilities, establishes minimum penalties through an administrative penalty system and requires alternative penalties for minors who violate the law. The state law also places restrictions on self - service merchandising and sales of tobacco products through vending machines. Our present Code Section 1325 already addresses self - service merchandising and sales through vending machines. However, Section 1325 did not mandate compliance checks, did not provide for an administrative penalty system with fines and did not address alternative penalties for minors. The proposed Code Section 1326 addresses the state law as follows: Self- Service Merchandising Prohibited, except in establishments which i) prohibit minors from entering the establishment, ii) post notice advising of the prohibition at all entrances and, iii) either derive at least 90% of their revenues from the sale of tobacco and tobacco related products or tobacco related devices or limit self - service merchandising to cigars and cigar related products. Compliance Checks At least annually perform compliance checks by using minors to attempt to purchase tobacco or tobacco related products, or tobacco related devices under the supervision of an authorized City official. Violations An administrative penalty system will be in place to establish minimum fines and provide for the hearing of appeal from the violation. Until such time that a hearing officer is appointed, the City Council shall serve as the hearing officer. Penalties Any Licensee found to have violated the Code Section shall be charged an administrative fee of $75.00 for the first violation, $200.00 for the second violation within a two year period and $250.00 for the third violation within a two year period with a suspension of the license for seven days after the third violation. Other individuals, such as non minor clerks, found in violation of this Code Section shall be charged an administrative fee of $50.00 per offense. Minors found in violation of this Code Section shall be charged an administrative fee of $25.00 per offense until such time an alternative penalty system for minors has been established. Alternative penalties for minors will be investigated with the participation of educators, parents, the courts, and children. A recommendation regarding alternative penalties for minors will be brought to the City Council once we have completed this investigation. This law specifically authorizes the implementation of alternative penalties for minors who violate the tobacco laws. At this time, we lack the authority to explore alternative penalties for minors who violate other local or state laws. The juvenile courts have been utilizing alternative penalties for minors, such as diversion programs, as part of their process. Edina Ordinance No. 1997 - 17 AN ORDINANCE REPEALING SECTION 1325 OF THE CITY CODE AND REPLACING IT WITH A NEW SECTION 1326 FOR THE PURPOSE OF REGULATING THE SALE AND USE OF TOBACCO PRODUCTS The City Council of the City of Edina Ordains: Section Section 1325 of the City Code is repealed in its entirety. Section The City Code is amended by adding a new Section 1326 as follows: Section 1326 - Sale of Tobacco; Licensing 1326.01 Definitions. Unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, the following terms have the meanings given them in this Subsection: Tobacco or Tobacco Related Product shall mean any substance or item containing tobacco leaf, including but no limited to cigarettes, cigars, pipe tobacco; snuff; fine cut or other chewing tobacco; cheroots; stogies; perique; granulated, plug cut, crimp cut, ready - rubbed and other smoking tobacco; snuff flowers; cavendish; shorts; plug and twist tobaccos; dipping tobaccos; refuse scraps, clippings, cutting and sweepings of tobacco; and other kinds and forms of tobacco leaf prepared in such manner as to be suitable for chewing, sniffing, or smoking. Tobacco Related Device shall mean any tobacco product as well as a pipe, rolling papers, or other device intentionally designed or intended to be used in a manner which enables the chewing, sniffing, or smoking of tobacco or tobacco related products. Self - Service Merchandising shall mean the open displays of tobacco or tobacco related products, or tobacco related devices in any manner where any person shall have access to the tobacco or tobacco related products, or tobacco related devices, without the assistance or intervention of the licensee or the licensee's employee. Moveable Place of Business shall mean any form of business operated out of a truck, van, automobile, or other type of vehicle or transportable shelter and not a fixed address store front or other permanent type of structure authorized for sales transactions. Minor shall mean any natural person who has not yet reached the age of eighteen (18) years. Retail Sale shall mean any transfer of goods for money, trade, barter, or other consideration. Vending Machine shall mean any mechanical, electric or electronic, or other type of device which dispenses tobacco or tobacco related products, or tobacco related devices upon the insertion of money, tokens, or other form of payment directly into the machine by the person seeking to purchase the tobacco or tobacco related product, or tobacco related devices. Compliance Checks shall mean the system the City of Edina uses to investigate and ensure that those authorized to sell tobacco or tobacco related products, and tobacco related devices are following and complying with the requirements of this Section. Compliance Checks shall also mean the use of minors who attempt to purchase tobacco or tobacco related products, or tobacco related devices for education, research and training purposes as authorized by State and Federal laws. Compliance checks may also be conducted by other units of government for the purpose of enforcing appropriate Federal, State or local laws and regulations relating to tobacco or tobacco related products, and tobacco related devices. 1326.02 License Required. No person shall keep tobacco or tobacco related products, or tobacco related devices for retail sale or sell tobacco or tobacco related products, or tobacco related devices at retail in the City without first obtaining a license from the City. No license shall be issued for the sale of tobacco or tobacco related products, or tobacco related devices at a movable place of business or from a vending machine. 1326.03 License Procedure. The provisions of Section 160 of this Code shall apply to all licenses required by this Section and to the holders of such licenses, except that licenses shall be issued or denied by the Sanitarian. The applications for a license shall be on forms provided by the Sanitarian and shall be accompanied by the fee set forth in Section 185 of this Code. 1326.04 Term of License. Each license issued pursuant to this Section shall expire on March 31 of each calendar year. 1326.05 Rules and Regulations. Subd. 1. Legal Age. No person shall sell any tobacco or tobacco related product, or tobacco related device to any minor. Subd. 2. Controlled Substances. No person shall sell or keep for sale any tobacco containing any controlled substance as defined in Section 1030 of this Code, except nicotine or tobacco. Subd. 3. Self- Service Merchandising. No person shall sell any tobacco by means whereby the customer may .have access to such items without having to request assistance from an employee of the licensed premises. The assistance or intervention shall entail the actual physical exchange of the tobacco or tobacco related product or tobacco related device between the customer and the licensee or employee. All tobacco or tobacco related products, or tobacco devices shall be stored or displayed behind a sales counter or in other rooms or display areas which are not freely accessible to customers. Provided however, the requirements of this Subd. 3 shall not apply to establishments which, i) prohibit minors from entering the establishment unless accompanied by a parent or legal guardian, ii) post notice advising of the prohibition is conspicuously displayed at all entrances to the establishment and, iii) either derive at least ninety percent (90 %) of their revenues from the sale of tobacco and tobacco related products or limit self service merchandising to cigars and cigar related products. Subd. 4. Illegal Possession. No minor shall have in his or her possession any tobacco or tobacco related product, or tobacco related device. This subdivision shall not apply to minors lawfully involved in compliance checks. Subd. 5. Illegal Use. No minor shall smoke, chew, sniff, or otherwise use any tobacco or tobacco related product, or tobacco related device. Subd. 6. Illegal Procurement. No minor shall purchase or attempt to purchase or otherwise obtain any tobacco or tobacco related product, or tobacco related device, and no person shall purchase or otherwise obtain such items on behalf of a minor. No person shall coerce or attempt to coerce a minor to illegally purchase or otherwise obtain or use any tobacco or tobacco related product, or tobacco related device. This subdivision shall not apply to minors lawfully involved in compliance checks. Subd. 7. Use of False Identification. No minor shall attempt to disguise his or her true age by the use of a false form of identification, whether the identification is that of another person or one on which the age of the person has been modified or tampered with to represent an age older than the actual age of the person. 1326.06 Compliance Checks and Inspections. All licensed premises shall be open to inspection by the City or other authorized official during regular business hours. From time to time, but at least once per year, the City shall conduct compliance checks by engaging, with the written consent of their parents or guardians, minors over fifteen (15) years but less than eighteen (18) years, to enter the licensed premises to attempt to purchase tobacco or tobacco related products, or tobacco related devices. Minors used for the purpose of compliance checks shall be supervised by designated law enforcement officers or other designated City personnel. Minors used for compliance checks shall not be guilty of the unlawful purchase or attempted purchase, nor unlawful possession of tobacco or tobacco related products, or tobacco related devices when such items are obtained or attempted to be obtained as a part of the compliance check. No minor used in the compliance checks shall attempt to use a false identification misrepresenting the minor's age, and all minors lawfully engaged in a compliance check shall answer all questions about the minor's age for which he or she is asked. Nothing in this Subsection shall prohibit compliance checks authorized by State or Federal laws for educational, research, or training purposes, or required for the enforcement of a particular State or Federal law. 1326.07 Violations. The following notification and hearing process will apply to violations of this Section. Subd. 1. Notice. Upon discovery of a suspected violation, the alleged violator shall be issued, either personally or by mail, a citation that sets forth the alleged violations and which shall inform the alleged violator of his or her rights to be heard on the accusation. Subd. 2. Hearings. If a person accused of violating this Section so requests, a hearing shall be scheduled, the time and place of which shall be published and provided to the accused violator. Subd. 3. Hearing Officer. The City Council shall serve as the hearing officer until such time a hearing officer is appointed by the City Council. Subd. 4. Decision. If the hearing determines that a violation of this Section did occur, that decision along with the reasons for finding a violation and the penalty to be imposed under Subsection 1326.08 of this Section, shall be recorded in writing, a copy of which shall be provided to the accused violator. Likewise, if the hearing finds that no violation occurred or finds grounds for not imposing any penalty, such findings shall be recorded and a copy provided to the acquitted accused violator. Subd. 5. Appeals. Appeals of any decision made by the Council shall be filed in Hennepin County district court. Subd. 6. Misdemeanor Prosecution. Nothing in the Section shall prohibit the City from seeking prosecution as a misdemeanor for any alleged violation of this Section. If the City elects to seek misdemeanor prosecution, no administrative penalty shall be imposed. Subd. 7. Continued Violation. Each violation, and every day in which a violation occurs or continues, shall constitute a separate offense. 1326.08 Penalties. The following administrative penalties will be applied as set forth below. Subd. 1. Licensees. Any licensee found to have violated this Section, or whose employee shall have violate this Section, shall be charged an administrative fine of $75.00 for the first violation of this Section; $200.00 for the second offense at the same licensed premises within a twenty-four month period; and $250.00 for a third or subsequent offense at the same location with a twenty-four month periods. In addition, after the third offense, the license shall be suspended for not less than seven days. Subd. 2. Other Individuals. Other individuals, other than minors regulated by Subdivision 3 of this Subsection, found to be in violation of this Section shall be charged an administrative fee of $50.00. Subd. 3. Minors. Minors who use or are found in unlawful possession of, or who unlawfully purchase or attempt to purchase, tobacco or tobacco related products, or tobacco related devices, shall be charged an administrative fee of $25.00 per offense until such time an alternative penalty system has been established. Subd. 4. Misdemeanor. Nothing in this Section shall prohibit the City from seeking prosecution as a misdemeanor for any violation of this Section. 1326.09 Exceptions and Defenses. Nothing in this Section shall prevent the providing of tobacco or tobacco related products, or tobacco related devices to a minor as part of a lawfully recognized religious, spiritual, or cultural ceremony. It shall be an affirmative defense to the violation of this Section for a person to have reasonably relied on proof of age as described by State law. Section Effective Date. This Section shall become effective immediately upon its passage and publication. Adopted this day of 1997. Attest City Clerk Mayor YO REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor Smith and Council Members FROM: David Velde, City Sanitarian VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager DATE: November 17, 1997 AGENDA ITEM _ V • A ITEM DESCRIPTION: Refuse & recycling pick -up for Edina city properties Amount of Quote or Bid Company. AnnuallX 1. Aspen Waste Systems, Inc.. $20,965.20 2. Quality Waste Control, Inc. $23,850.21 3. Aagard Environmental Services $25,352.23 4. USA Waste of Minnesota $26,456.25 5. Browning - Ferris Industries of Minnesota $27,002.55 6. Dick's Sanitation/Lakeville Sanitary $27,172.23 7. Waste Management $27,327.00 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Aspen Waste Systems, Inc. $20,965.20 GENERAL INFORMATION: Aspen Waste Systems, Inc. is a licensed refuse collector within the City of Edina. The contract is for the collection of refuse and recyclables at City properties. The contract will be for one year, 1998, with an option for an additional year upon approval by City Council. Ara"o Edina Health David Velde, City Sanitarian Department This Recommended bid is within budget not within budget rolin Wallin Finance D' ctor Kenneth Aosfand, City Mana r TO: FROM: VIA: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Mayor & City Council Francis J. Hoffman, Director of Public Works Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 UA I t: NovemDer i t, ivut /iVCIVUf� 1 1 MVI ITEM DESCRIPTION: Two Dump Truck Boxes with Snow Removal Attachments Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. J. Craft (State of Minnesota Contract 2006106) 1. $100,279.77 2. 2. 3. 3. 4. 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: J. Craft (State Contract) GENERAL INFORMATION: $100,279.77 This is the purchase for two dump truck boxes with snow removal attachments, i.e., plow, wing and sander. These units will be placed on the two cab and chassis ordered earlier. This purchase is from the State of Minnesota contracts, which local political subdivisions can use. This purchase is funded through the equipment replacement budget. Public Works - Streets Sig tur D partment The Recommended Bid is ¢- -� ;--- within budget not within budget J n Wallin, Fina a Director Kenneth Ro4fand, City Manager 1^ 4 :,.Z e ow e v, ftiroR� ,969 ,� tt co REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item # IV.A. From: GORDON L. HUGHES Consent ❑ JOHN KEPRIOS Date: NOVEMBER 17, 1997 Information Only ❑ Subject: Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council ORDINANCE NO. 1997 -14 Action AMENDING SECTION ❑ Motion 1230 AND 900 OF THE CITY ❑ Resolution CODE ® Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Grant First Reading. Info /Background: On November 3, 1997, the Council considered the subject ordinance which re gulate the consumption and the sale of various alcoholic beverages at City -owned facilities. The Council directed that the proposed ordinance be revised to reflect more where certain beverages may be consumed or sold. The revised ordinance provides the following: p s the CMQW This section amends Section 1230 of the Code which deals g consumption on City properties. The proposed ordinance provides that 3.2 beer, stron beer and wine may be consumed at the Braemar Golf Course clubhouse, the Richards g Golf Course clubhouse, Edin borough Park, Centennial Lakes Park Centrum Arneson Acres Park and the Art Center. Such consumption must occur within the building g or on patios, etc. which adjoin the building. In addition, all such beer or wine mus t be dispensed by the City or an agent of the City such as a beverage service authorized the City. zed by U REPORT /RECOMMENDATION - ORDINANCE NO. 1997 -14 November 17, 1997 Page two Section 2. This section provides that 3.2 beer, but not strong beer or wine, may be consumed at Van Valkenburg Park within the ballfield complex. Such beer must be dispensed by the City or an authorized agent and must be dispensed pursuant to a temporary on -sale 3.2 beer license issued by the Council. Section 3. This section provides that 3.2 beer dispensed by the City or an authorized agent may be consumed on the golf course at Braemar and Richards golf courses. Section 4. This section is clerical in nature. Section 5. This section as well as the next section deal with the sale of certain alcoholic beverages. Section 5 provides, among other things, that the Council may issue an on -sale 3.2 beer license to Braemar Golf Course, Richards Golf Course and the Edina Golf Dome. No other City facilities are eligible for an on -sale 3.2 beer license. The Council should note, however, that Van Valkenburg Park as well as most other City properties are eligible for a temporary on -sale 3.2 beer license under the present City Code. No changes are needed to this section of the Code. Such temporary licenses may be issued 1) for up to three consecutive days, 2) not more than twice per year to any one organization, and 3) no more than four licenses -per year per location. Section 6. This section provides that 3.2 beer purchased at a facility pursuant to a license must be served and consumed only in certain locations. Section 7 & 8. These sections are clerical in nature. We trust that this ordinance responds to your direction. ,j ORDINANCE NO. 1997 -14 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 1230 AND SECTION 900 OF THE CITY CODE TO PERMIT THE CONSUMPTION OF INTOXICATING MALT LIQUOR IN CERTAIN PARK FACILITIES AND TO PERMIT THE SALE OF NON - INTOXICATING MALT LIQUOR ON CITY GOLF COURSES AND TO CHANGE THE TERMINOLOGY OF NON-'INTOXICATING MALT LIQUOR THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Subparagraph 1 of Paragraph O of Subsection 1230.02- of the,City Code is amended to'read as follows: "I., 3.2 percent malt liquor, intoxicating malt liquor and wine which is- dispensed by the City or by an authorized agent of the City may be consumed subject to other applicable provisions of this Code and subject to the rules and regulations of the Park Director pursuant to Subsection 1230.06 in the following places: a. Inside the clubhouse building or on decks, patios and other outdoor dining areas which are adjacent to the clubhouse building at Braemar Golf Course and at Fred Richards Golf Course. b. Inside the Edinborough Park building, the Centennial Lakes Park Centrum building, the building at Arneson Acres Park,'the' Edina Art Center Building and on decks, patios and other outdoor dining areas which are adjacent to such buildings. Section 2. Paragraph O of Subsection 1230.02 of the City Code is amended by adding a new subparagraph 2 as follows: "2. 3.2 percent malt liquor which is dispensed by the City or by an agent of the City pursuant to a temporary on -sale 3.2 percent malt liquor license issued in accordance with Section 900 of this Code may be consumed subject to other applicable provisions of this Code and subject to the rules and regulations of the Park Director pursuant to Subsection 1230.06 within the confines of the ball field complex at Van Valkenburg Park." Section 3. Paragraph O of Subsection 1230.02 of the City Code is amended by adding a new subparagraph 3 as follows: "3. 3.2 percent malt liquor which is dispensed by the City or by an agent of the City pursuant to a 3.2 malt liquor license issued in accordance with Section 900 of the City Code may be consumed subject to other applicable provisions of this Code and subject to the rules and regulations of the Park Director pursuant to Subsection 1230:06 on the grounds of Braemar Golf Course and Fred Richards Golf Course. Section 4. Subparagraph 2 of Paragraph O of Subsection 1230.02 is re- numbered Subparagraph 4. Section 5. Subsection 900.13 of the City Code is amended to read as follows: "900.13 Special Licensing Requirements. In addition to the requirements imposed by Subsection 900.06, 3.2 percent malt liquor licenses shall be issued only to (i) private clubs which have been incorporated for more than ten years and which own and. operate club houses for their members in which the serving of suchliquor is incidental to and not the major purpose of such. club, (ii) restaurants, (iii) golf courses, (iv) the Edina Golf Dome, (v) bowling centers and (vi) hotels as defined in M.S. 340A. Section 6. Subsection 900.14 of the City Code is amended to read as follows: "900.14. Place of Serving and Consumption. `3.2 percent malt liquor sold pursuant to a3.2 percent malt liquor license shall be served and consumed at tables in the dining or refreshment room on the licensed premises and shall not be.consumed or served at bars; provided, the same may be consumed or served at the following locations: A. At counters where food is regularly served and consumed. B. On decks, patios and, other outdoor dining areas which are adjacent to the licensed premises. C. , On the grounds of a golf course. Section 7. The City Code is amended by replacing all references to "non- intoxicating malt liquor" with "3.2 percent malt liquor." Section 8. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon passage and publication-. l Section 4. Subparagraph 2 of Paragraph O of Subsection 1230.02 is re- numbered Subparagraph 4. Section 5. Subsection 900.13 of the City Code is amended to read as follows: "900.13 Special Licensing Requirements. In addition to the requirements imposed by Subsection 900.06, 3.2 percent malt liquor licenses shall be issued only to (i) private clubs which have been incorporated for more than ten years and which own and. operate club houses for their members in which the serving of suchliquor is incidental to and not the major purpose of such. club, (ii) restaurants, (iii) golf courses, (iv) the Edina Golf Dome, (v) bowling centers and (vi) hotels as defined in M.S. 340A. Section 6. Subsection 900.14 of the City Code is amended to read as follows: "900.14. Place of Serving and Consumption. `3.2 percent malt liquor sold pursuant to a3.2 percent malt liquor license shall be served and consumed at tables in the dining or refreshment room on the licensed premises and shall not be.consumed or served at bars; provided, the same may be consumed or served at the following locations: A. At counters where food is regularly served and consumed. B. On decks, patios and, other outdoor dining areas which are adjacent to the licensed premises. C. , On the grounds of a golf course. Section 7. The City Code is amended by replacing all references to "non- intoxicating malt liquor" with "3.2 percent malt liquor." Section 8. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon passage and publication-. a o e Cn ,888 REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: VINCE BONGAARTS TRAFFIC SAFETY COORDINATOR Date: NOVEMBER 17, 1997 Subject: TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW, NOVEMBER 4, 1997 Recommendation: Agenda Item # Vi_A_ Consent Information Only Mgr. Recommends F-� To HRA ® To Council Action ® Motion Resolution Ordinance Discussion Approve Traffic Safety Staff Review of November 4, 1997. Info /Background: A resident of Edgebrook Place will be present at the Council Meeting to speak to Section B. 5, a request to change the direction of Edgebrook Place one -way. TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 4. 1997 The staff review of traffic safety matters occurred on November 4, 1997. Staff present included the Assistant City Manager, Police Chief, City Engineer, Assistant City Engineer, the Traffic Safety Coordinator and the Public Works Traffic Control Specialist. From that review, the below recommendations are provided. On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and the staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They have also been informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, they can be included on the November 17, 1997, Council Agenda. SECTION A: Requests on which the staff recommends approval. Request for assistance with a speed problem in the 5200 -5300 block of Halifax and the 3900 block of W. 54' Street. Requester says that the speed creates a hazard for those backing out of their driveways and also pedestrians. There have been two accidents at W. 52 "d and Halifax since 1991 and two accidents at W. 54' and Halifax. All four accidents were property damage type accidents. There is a pedestrian type sign with "25 MPH" speed advisory at 5204 Halifax for southbound Halifax traffic. The same sign is also at 5325 Halifax for northbound Halifax traffic and on W. 54"' Street just west of Halifax for westbound traffic. Observations showed that there was considerable traffic eastbound on W. 54th Street during the evening rush hour with an 85 percentile speed of approximately 36 MPH. This traffic comes from Wooddale to avoid the 50th & France area. There is also some traffic using Halifax rather than France Avenue presumably to also avoid some of the 501 & France area. The staff after discussion, recommends extended speed enforcement and use of the speed display monitor trailer for educational purposes on W. 54th Street between France Avenue and Minnehaha Boulevard and also the 5200 -5300 block of Halifax Avenue. TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW November 4, 1997 Page 2 2. Request for speed enforcement on.West Shore Drive between W. 701h Street and Hibiscus. Requester.feels that West Shore invites speed-because of its wideness and openness which creates a problem for pedestrians, bicyclists, etc.. Since 1991 there has been only one recorded accident on this stretch of West Shore and that was at the intersection of Gilford Drive. The traffic on West Shore is primarily local and somewhat intermittent with no real heavy rush hour traffic. Because -of this, there is a tendency for vehicles to exceed the 30 MPH limit. The staff after review, recommends speed enforcement by the Police Department on West Shore Drive between W. 70th Street and Hibiscus. The speed - display monitor trailer will also be assigned for educational purposes. 3. Request for a crosswalk and "Yield to Pedestrian" signs,on.Southview Lane between the north parking lot and the Community Center. This has been discussed and denied in the past because of its close proximity to the intersection at Southview Lane and Normandale Road. There already is a crosswalk at this intersection that crosses from the north side to south side of Southview Lane. There is also a 3 -way "Stop" at this T- intersection requiring vehicles to stop. The staff after discussion and review recommends a denial of the proposed crosswalk. The 'staff does recommend however, the construction of a pathway between the parking lot and the now- existing crosswalk. As most of this involves City right of way the construction would be done by the City. This would.giVe'tlose using north parking. lot easy access to the crosswalk. Doug Johnson, the Director of the Community Center, concurs with the' staffs recommendation and will see that the path is kept free of snow, etc. 4. Request for a better marked crosswalk on W. 66' Street at West Shore Drive. The requester says that the traffic traveling east -west on'W. 66th Street at West Shore does not stop or yield to pedestrians in the crosswalk. The requester feels that better'signing to advise the drivers of the crosswalk is needed.' TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW November 4, 1997 Page 3 The staff after discussion, recommends that additional signage be added to enhance the crosswalks both at W. 66th Street and West Shore and at W 66th Street and Cornelia. The signs to be added would be placed in such a manner as to warn approaching drivers that they must stop for pedestrians in the upcoming crosswalk. Rather than international -type signs whey would have their message in English letter form. These signs would be used on an experimental basis to be evaluated after a couple months to determine their effect on the traffic. SECTION B: Requests on which the staff recommends denial of request. Request for a 4 -way "Stop" sign at W. 661h Street and West Shore Drive. The requester, who lives in the house on the southwest corner of this intersection, feels that a 4 -way "Stop" would promote slower traffic and better safety. The requester says there have been many accidents in the 25 years that they have lived there. The accident history for this location shows only one accident since 1991. This occurred on 12/16/92 and was a personal injury type accident. W. 66`h Street is one of the few east -west collector streets in Edina. It was just recently upgraded and repaved. It is designed to move traffic faster than normal residential streets and has a posted speed limit of 35 MPH. There is a daily average vehicle rate for east -west W. 66"' Street of approximately 4000 vehicles. North -south West Shore at W. 66th Street has a daily average of under 650 vehicles. A 4 -way "Stop" at this location would greatly impede the flow of traffic and conflict with what the road was designed for. The staff upon review, recommends denial of the 4 -way "Stop" for lack of any warrants. 2. Request for "Stop" signs on W. 66`h Street at Naomi Drive. Requester says that the "Stop" signs are needed to provide a safe place to cross W. 66th Street at Naomi Drive in order to come and go from the park. TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW November 4, 1997 Page 4 A traffic count and speed survey were done over a 24 hour period on a.weekday. There were 623 vehicles eastbound during this time period with an.85. percentile speed of 39.7 MPH. Almost 12% of these vehicles were over 40 MPH. There were 1118 vehicles westbound with an 85 percentile speed of 42.7 MPH. Approximately 28% of these vehicles were over 40 MPH, (speed limit 30 MPH). The heaviest traffic time is between 4:30 PM and 6:30 PM. There is a "Hill" warning advisory sign for westbound W. 66'h Street at Wilryan. A block further west at Tingdale there is a "Playground" advisory sign. There are no sidewalks in this area. The north side of W: 66th Street is posted "No Parking ". There is no accident history for W. 66`' Street at Naomi Drive.. The staff after review and discussion of the situation, recommends denial of "Stop" signs for lack of warrants. However, the staff does recommend increased speed enforcement by the Police Department and use of the speed monitor - display trailer for educational purposes. 3. Request for "Stop" signs on Ewing at W. 61 s', Chowen Curve, and W. 62nd Street to slow down traffic on Ewing Avenue. Area of request is between W. 60th Street and the Crosstown, on Ewing. Traffic on this street is basically local traffic. There is. no accident history for any of the intersections listed. There is an average 85 percentile speed of approximately 34 MPH. The staff after review recommends denial of "Stop" signs for lack of warrants. The speed- monitor display trailer was put at this location on 11/7/97 and will be used there again for educational purposes. 4. Request for "Stop" signs and speed bumps at Richmond Drive and Richmond Circle. Requester feels there is excessive speed by vehicles using Richmond Drive which creates a dangerous situation for the pedestrians and many children that live in the area. Requester feels that part of the problem is cut - through traffic from west frontage road of Highway 100. TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW November 4, 1997 Page 5 There is no accident history for this area. This area has no sidewalks. Observations made during evening rush hours, 4:30 PM to 6:00 PM, showed very light traffic of 37 vehicles with an 85 percentile speed of 33 MPH with the highest speed at 36 MPH. The staff after review, recommends denial of "Stop" signs for lack of warrants. The staff also recommends denial of speed bumps at the intersection. The speed- monitor trailer was put at this location on 11/6/97 and will be assigned there again for educational purposes. 5. Request to change the direction of Edgebrook Place one -way. A petition was received from 11 of the 15 residents bordering on Edgebrook Place to change the direction of Edgebrook Place one -way. The explanation for the change is attached to this report along with a memo from the Assistant City Engineer that includes a copy of the "Edina Country Club Neighborhood Traffic Study" that was done by Strgar Roscoe- Fausch, Inc. (SRF) in 1993. The staff upon review and discussion recommends denial of the request. The, families that live on Edgebrook Place .and those whose backyard driveways back up to Edgebrook Place wish to explain our petition. 1. First, several driveways were built in the twenties wRth a curve that permitted easy exit for a street that exited- on, the Southern end of Edgebrook Place.. ( actually four-although several attempts have been made to alleviate this new-reversal on two driveways..One meant cutting down a lovely,large old tree which would have been a. terrible solution.) One driveway in particular must make two driving backward and forward moves in order to exit their driveway. If a car is parked in front of 'the neighbors house across the-street, this particular family cannot enter their own driveway-they must go around the block and, risk hitting a car going then "correct" direction. Obviously this is not ideal after a. days work. The other driveways are much easier to exit . the "old correct" direction: 2. Exiting on the northern end can be downright dangerous if trucks or vans are parked on the northwest side of Browndale..often, you cannot see. what is coming north over the hill, on Browndale.: Also, last year. 'the snow' up and we could not see what. was traveling north on Browndale without moving out into the street. It is much safer if me can once again exit on the south end of the street-we can see oncoming traffic. 3. With the traffic moving north on Edgebrook, the driver must get out of their car into a snowbank or construction materials (as we have had to do all summer). If the street went the other way, the driver can let out his passengers and then park and get out on the street side-This is obviously better when people visit your home. 4. All .of the Edgebrook" neighbors have signed this petition except two. One doesn't want to make a- right turn around a tree on the side of their driveway..( although Dr. and Mrs Florie and their three children turned. that way for over twenty years.) The other person who did not sign the petition was concerned about the possible removal of the stop sign at the Browndale exit of our street, which brings us to.our final plea. WHY can't the said stop sign on Browndale remain near the entrance of Edgebrook. We still have to stop and look before entering Edgebrook and the people on Browndale would, still have to stop rather than '"perhaps" speed to the next sign on Country Club Road. Even if you decide to put in a stop sign at the other end of Edgebrook Place, we won't mind because our street would be so much easier to negotiate: When Edgebrook Place was "reversed ". we did complain, but to no avail-we now know how deleterious that move was to all concerned. we hope you give serious consideration to our plea. It is certainly easier and safer for all concerned. Thank you for hearing us out. We; ' the undersigned, would like to return 'Edgebrook Place to the original direction ,it has followed since 1920: Many of our driveways were built originally, at an. angle- that accomodated . the original north-south direction. -•Also ' ' 1 W -- . __ -- . -. •• -- = - - -- :- -.� : •�_ . _ -� hen,.exting•�from_..the -- = - -- - - -= ` - -. _- =- ._. •_ ; newer, changed direction, it.-is. far more difficult and dangerous to. try ::and see around any parked_ cars .-or trucks ..on. Brown dale - and snowdrifts are far more difficult to, see over. when looking in a southerly direction.. In short, we wish to- return to, Edgebrook's.;- ORIGINAL STRE i' DIRECTION -. - 1. c �.c �,c,c.. �cn l ' E °ti��. 2. 1 4. 6. ^mot ;({ u ` . • C�'� 1� /1 J Lf:/1�1; rZ _ r6 V• lu/l.1�(?t' Iri.LC:Yri\ `_/ i• i .1`'' l:~J��? G- 4� `rk�r;�, _O 109 �� m c2zC -•�E,,� CITY OF EDINA INTEROFFFICE MEMORANDUM DATE: October 13, 1997 - TO: Vince Bongaarts - Traffic Safety Coordinator FROM: City 9 Wayne Houle, PE - Assistant Ci Engineer Y SUBJECT: Traffic flow at Edgebrook Place Attached are excerpts from the Edina Country Club Neighborhood Traffic Study, by Strgar- Roscoe- Fausch, Inc., July 1993. Please note that Edgebrook Place was analyzed as part of this study. My observations is that backing out onto Edgebrook (south -to -north traffic flow) should flow smoothly with the exceptions of 4632, 4634, & 4638. The angle of approach onto Edgebrook from theathipe driveways is less than 90 degrees but with current no- parking on the Aeoilih side of Edgebrook these vehicle operators should be able to navigate backing onto Edgebrook. See attached drawing. I calculate the traffic on Edgebrook Place is approximately 143 vehicles per day (using 11 vehicles per household per day). The report also states the following: • Sight distance problem due to crest hill north of south, intersection of Edgebrook Place and Browndale Road. • Heavily used bus stop at the north intersection. IN All -way stop control at north intersection should exist only if northbound one -way operation is maintained. ■ Residents from this study, in 1993, agreed. IN 'An all -way stop control at north intersection deters short-cut through the neighborhood. I recommend denial for reverse of the northbound one -way operation due to the above observations, and the report findings. �.r • 0 PREPARED BY: STRGAR - ROSCOE- FAUSCH, INC. JULY 1993 SRF No. 0921752 roadways intersecting Sunnyside Road and Country Club Road be controlled with stop signs. It is also .proposed that the intersections of Wooddale Avenue and Sunnyside Road and Wooddale Avenue and Country Club Road be modified to have the triangles reshaped to serve as medians for Woodale Avenue and that those intersections be controlled with all -way stop signs. Both of these intersections are the central intersection of a tightly spaced group of three. See Figures 6, 7 and 8 - Intersection Modifications. The two intersections of Edgebrook Place and Browndale Road have been the subject of numerous complaints by the nearby residences. There is limited sight distance caused by a crest hill on Browndale. There is a heavily used school bus stop near the north intersection. There is no side street control on the approach to Browndale Road. There has been a request for all -way stop control at the north intersection. Currently Edgebrook Place has one way operation going away from Browndale at the north intersection and all -way control would therefore be inappropriate. It has been suggested that the school bus stop be relocated, but the residents felt that it was at a logical location for that purpose although the sight distance was not good. The residents of the area have continued to request an all -way stop at the north Edgebrook Place intersection. This request should be honored only if the one -way operation on Edgebrook Place is reversed. The residents in attendance at the meeting have agreed to that stipulation. The presence of an all -way stop on Browndale Road will help keep Browndale Road from becoming the new short-cut through the neighborhood after the intersection controls are Installed elsewhere. D. TRAFFIC CONTROLS AND RECONSTRUCTION OPTIONS FOR THE BROWNDALE BRIDGE The need for some form of reconstruction of Browndale Bridge require that the options for traffic control be integral to the type of reconstruction selected. The existing bridge operation is not deemed safe by state and national standards and ignoring the issue by leaving the bridge as is, is not recommended. Investigations are still underway as to the options for improving the bridge without destroying its character and without making it an attractive conduit for more traffic through the neighborhood. There appears to be the possibility that the existing bridge railing can be replaced in a manner that provides the required driving surface without widening the main bridge structure. A separate pedestrian bridge or other route for pedestrians would be needed with that option. Making the bridge one -way (either direction) with provisions for pedestrians on the bridge is also possible. The reactions of the neighborhood representatives did not indicate a unified preference for any particular option. Their primary concern was that through traffic not be increased. The residents along Wooddale and the other streets to the east did express a preference, however. They felt strongly that two-way traffic be maintained in some form. They feel this way because any reduction in traffic on the Browndale Bridge will likely result in an increase on those other streets. 13 a f ,iiw �y jOb �., i -�;� '�: fk wtlp '•' ^%Yr(Yf .�r:� ^+ay.. �} j-. ` r1y �:i* ..,•• ' . 1 4• I .G'I's�s ♦a i YT it ' +jam _♦ / .F '� �.. -� • � + •� ' �, ., M _ •Ili' �f. ., i;�f'��G�I� Jf. � 1 : 1 t; ' %R.� �� 'L.�' J :, ,,`.' - _'� .� i 60(49) 09 - 1 Q ( 1 S = 5 6 ] I a 53 c6 6■■ •a l_ )y4 _ . X610 � � 614 ( 664612 ; e ` a (35) ° 61 4, �� 21 J , (65) -- 4614 V' r• a y: 461 d i�, 0 �9 \• N r - -ml ry 54) �I 'I. m $ (87,4620 � s� (63) 461 (57) �� \ 3 462 \ 6 22 (ee) (59) $ J 62 (6� )462 6 �\ (e9 6 \ 13 (462... (80 (, 462 (60) 4630 X63 ° 440 2.1 ( 5e) X91)' 6 ` J19 r s. • t eo .. PL 4 y, , 8 6 .9) 6''4 1 6 r (84) (9! M. J go ti 90S(9-3) CREEK ` - - - - -- - 'J J I (91) ,9. i b TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW November 4, 1997 Page 6 SECTION C: Requests which are deferred to a later date or referred to others. Request for no through truck traffic or truck restrictions on Washington Avenue, between 3`d Street South and Maloney Avenue. This also includes a request for speed enforcement. The requesters say that the truck traffic and speed on Washington Avenue between 3rd Street South and Maloney Avenue has gotten way out of hand and creates a dangerous environment for those residents living on Washington Avenue. Washington Avenue between 3' Street South and Maloney Avenue is a residential street with a speed limit of 30 "MPH. It is a fairly narrow street (32 -34' width) with the Highway 169 sound barrier on the west side and 18 residential dwellings on the east side. Washington Avenue borders with Hopkins on the north or at 3rd Street South. Super Value's warehouse is just north of the boundary in Hopkins. 3`d Street South also goes west under Highway 169 into a large industrial park area, that includes the Hennepin County shops and maintenance buildings. This area north of the Edina boundary at Washington Avenue has plenty of access to Highway 169 and other arterial roadways without coming south on Washington Avenue through the residential area. Washington Avenue between 3' Street South and Maloney is not a state aid street and is not considered a collector street. Surveys show however, that it is used most like an arterial roadway. South of Maloney Avenue, Washington curves to the east to become Lincoln Drive which continues south where it intersects with Malibu Drive to the east and South 71' Street to the east. There are exits and entrance ramps to and from Highway 169 at South 71' Street. Posted on the exit ramps from 169 are regulatory signs restricting trucks from going to Hopkins side of highway. Therefore, all trucks exiting at this point whether they are going to the Hennepin County shops, or industrial park which are all located in Hopkins, have to come north on the Edina side using Washington Avenue. The Hopkins side of Highway 169 from South 7' Street to the industrial park has wider streets with parking restrictions and no residential dwellings that face the roads that would be used if the trucks were allowed in that way. Accident history for Washington Avenue shows a personal injury accident on 3/16/93 at Washington and Maloney, and a property damage accident on 1/25/96 at Washington and Belmore. TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW November 4, 1997 Page 7 A survey was taken on Washington Avenue between 3`d Street South and Maloney Avenue to determine traffic count, truck traffic, and speed. This survey was for a week long period from Tuesday, 10/14/97 to Monday, 10/20/97. The total number of vehicles in survey was 13,529. This was an average 1932 vehicles per day. The survey recorded the following types of trucks using the road (a diagram showing the different types is attached): Type 5 -291 average of 41.0 per day Type 6 -244 average of 35.0 per day Type 7 -77 average of 11.0 per day Type 8 -436 average of 62.0 per day Type 9 -43 average of 6.0 per day Type 12 -4 average of 0.6 per day Total number of trucks in the survey: 1095 or 156 trucks per day. The speed survey taken of the 13,529 vehicles indicated an average daily 85 percentile speed of 39.3 MPH. (This is a 30 MPH zone). 3836 vehicles or 28.0% were between 35 MPH and 40 MPH 1323 vehicles or 9.7% were between 40 MPH and 45 MPH 243 vehicles or 1.7% were between 45 MPH and 50 MPH 56 vehicles or 0.0% were 50+ MPH The staff reviewed and discussed the situation on Washington Avenue. They decided to make some additional contacts with Mn /DOT, Hennepin County, the City of Hopkins and Super Value and bring the issue back for further discussion on 12/2/97. TYPE 1 — -r= -- 0 F—\ czrM�'�� t TYPE 2 107 1 =r"� (� TYPE 3 ff-eeseeeee !,1 J = 1� 753 2' TYPE 4 BACK i • v � EN; TYPE 5 48 TYPE 6 fail TYPE 7 o O wi i, 90C. TYPE 8 �r�n� • • • • i CD 0 7YPE 9 CTYPE 10 1 TYPE 11 TYPE 12 TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW November 4, 1997 Page 8 2. Request for some kind of controls or signing to prevent speed and cut - through traffic in the Parkwood. Hills area. This. involves multiple requests ranging from the 6500 block of Parkwood Road to Dovre Drive and. Parkwood Lane. Several traffic counts, speed surveys, and observations were done of this area to determine what the problem entailed. First of all- the cut- through problem appears to be isolated to the - hours between 4:00 PM and 6 :30 PM. There doesn't appear to be. a big morning rush hour problem. Other than 4:00 to 6:30 PM the traffic flow in this'area is normal to _light. The cut- through traffic that starts around 4:00 PM comes in from,the Highway 169 /1-incoln Drive area to Dovre Drive. This traffic is.probably trying to avoid the meters on Highway 169, or the- intersection at Vernon and, Gleason Avenue. The traffic comes east on Dovre Drive. At Parkwood Lane it splits and goes north on. Parkwood Lane or continues east on Dovre Drive. The traffic that goes north on Parkwood Lane splits again at Parkwood Road where it,goes west or east on Parkwood Road. 'The traffic that goes west heads for Malibu Drive and places north such as Hopkins, Minnetonka, St. Louis Park, etc.' The traffic that goes east continues out to Blake Road and to places probably north and east from there. The traffic that continues east on Dovre Drive, goes to Londonderry Road where it heads north, to Parkwood Road or Stauder Circle. The majority: goes to Parkwood Road and then on to Blake Road. A smaller number goes east on Stauder Circle and out to Vernon Avenue. Again, the bulk of this cut - through traffic is Monday through Friday between 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM. A rough estimate is that 47 %-48% of the 24 hour daily traffic comes through the area at this time. Otherwise, its pretty quiet. The daily average traffic is under 1000 vehicles a day, Monday through Friday. A license plate check was done during one of the rush periods. During this check there were 380 vehicles that came east on Dovre Drive from Lincoln- Drive. 306 or 81 %- of,those vehicles were listed to places.'outside of Edina. Of the 74 Edina vehicles only 37 or 9% were local area residents. A side note to above was that the 306 non -Edina vehicles came from 59 different cities or towns. The majority were Minneapolis, St. Louis Park, Bloomington, Hopkins and Minnetonka. TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW November 4, 1997 Page 9 In addressing the speed problem, several speed surveys were done in the area. There was no excessive speed problems identified for the area during the surveys. The 85 percentiles for the area were: Parkwood /Londonderry - north of Stauder Circle - 28.5 MPH 6500 block Parkwood Road- 31.0 MPH Londonderry/south of Stauder Circle - 33.0 MPH Parkwood Lane from Dover Drive to Parkwood Road - 31.7 MPH Accident history shows only one property damage accident on 11/5/93 at Parkwood Road and Londonderry for the area. The staff reviewed and discussed the situation and decided to do another traffic count on Dovre Drive east of Lincoln Drive. The staff is also going to consult with Dennis Eyler of Strgar Roscoe Fausch (SRF). SRF did some previous studies of the Parkwood Hills area. Discussion on this will be continued to 12/2/97. In relation to the speed concern, the speed display- monitor trailer has already been used several times in the area and will be assigned there again. PROPOSAL FOR EDINA CITY COUNCIL November 17,1997 PROPOSED: A. That Edgebrook Place be returned to its original status as a south bound one -way street. B. That the two stop signs on Browndale Avenue, at the north exit of Edgebrook Place, be retained. BACKGROUND: Edgebrook Place was originally conceived, designed, and constructed as a south bound one way street in the 1920's. It served residents well until the street direction was arbitrarily reversed in the mid- 1990's -- without neighborhood input or assent. Concerns expressed about this reversal were ignored. We don't deserve to be ignored and respectfully request that this wrong be righted for the following rational reasons: WHY? Relative to Street Direction: 1. When affected homes in the area were built, many driveways on Edgebrook Place were angled to significantly favor access from the north. 2. Conversely, now that these same driveways must be entered from the south, undue hardships have been created for one resident, and varying degrees of inconvenience for others. 3. The most adversly affected resident can neither enter nor exit his driveway from the south without first backing into his neighbor's driveway across the street. Every trip, every day for two drivers in the household. A major pain! WHY? (con't.) Relative to street direction: 4. People parking on the west side of Edgebrook Place must exit the driver's side door onto the boulevard... this is OK in summer, but very difficult and dangerous in winter due to snow banks. One neighbor fell beneath her car last winter due to an icy snowbank when attempting to get out of her car on the driver's side. 5. Because drivers can't easily exit their cars in winter, they park their vehicles away from the snow banks and into the middle of the road. Since Edgebrook Place is already a very narrow street, this haphazard parking in winter makes it difficult or impossible for large vehicles and snowplows to pass. Under these conditions fire and emergency vechiles could not get through either. 6. Exiting from the north end of Edgebrook Place onto Browndale can be dangerous. The intersection is nearly blind when vehicles are parked on Browndale (near the intersection), and all winter when snow banks are high. Relative to Stop signs: 1. Browndale is a major north -south connecting street to /from West 50th street and is heavily travelled by area and non -area drivers. 2. Stop signs on Browndale must be retained as an ongoing means to control traffic speed on Browndale. The signs are already in place and there is no good reason to remove them. Without these stop signs, traffic would have a nearly 114 mile stretch in which to gain substantial speed before reaching the next stop signs at either end of Browndale. CONCLUSION: Residents of Edgebrook Place and Browndale Avenue overwhelmingly* want to change Edgebrook Place to a south bound one -way street and to retain the two stop signs on Browndale. We have signed a petition to that effect and see no reason why our simple request should be denied: - Many residents involved would be helped; none would be hurt. - Cost to the City would be minimal -- all signs and posts are already there, they simply need to be turned around or respotted in new locations. - This is not a new and revolutionary scheme, simply a return to the status quo. NOTE: Only two affected residents had any reservations about our petition. One person had no issue with the new street direction, but wanted to make sure the stop signs were retained on Browndale. One person was concerned that the south bound direction would make getting into her driveway more difficult. (It should be noted that the previous resident at this location had no difficulties getting in or out of his driveway during the 20+ years he lived there.) The people of Browndale Avenue and Edgebrook Place thank the members of the Edina City Council for their thoughtful consideration of our petition. Submitted on behalf of neighborhood petitioners by: Richard E. May 4632 Browndale Ave. Edina, MN 55424 920 -5692 We, the undersigned, would like to return Edgebrook Place to the original direction it has followed since 1920. Many of our driveways were built originally at an angle that accomodated the original north -south direction. Also, when exiting from the newer, changed direction, it is far more difficult and . dangerous to try and see around any parked cars or trucks on Browndale, and snowdrifts are far more difficult to see over when looking in a southerly direction. In short, we wish to return to Edgebrook's ORIGINAL ST E- DI CTIOl�: 1 • .�� 2 ..... --. • - � ` � �, _ _ i -. ` � � ' 1 - is ' �' • , i - 46a c}, 3 %� Grp i:.r ',; -1 � f�: . 4 �TQC% IYl -nom C 8. 2 i 9• r- �_� .i��(� f•_) �C� iii}` �. /� i / G d d Edgebrook Place G d Browndale �b �C }d' 0 S�f / rt O Z� �d ao 0 0 x is Browndale �b �C }d' 0 S�f / rt O Z� �d ao 0 0 x is REPORURECOM M EN DATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item VI.C. From: Debra Mangen Consent City Clerk Information Only 0 Date: November 17, 1997 Mgr. Recommends F� To HRA ® To Council Subject: Cub Foods Beer License Action ® Motion Resolution Ordinance Discussion Recommendation: Council approve issuance of an off -sale 3.2 Beer License to Super Valu, Inc. dba Cub Foods, located at 6775 York Avenue. Info /Background: Edina Code Section 900 requires Council approval of wine and beer licenses. The Police Department has approved an application for an off -sale 3.2 Beer License for Super Valu, Inc. dba Cub Foods located at 6775 York Avenue. Attached is Deputy Chief Sitari's memo stating the findings of the background investigation and his recommendation for approval. The license is being placed on the agenda for consideration by the Council. CITY OF EDINA EDINA POLICE DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: November 7, 1997 FROM: Deputy Chief Michael Siitari TO: Kenneth Rosland SUBJECT: 3.2 ON -SALE BEER LICENSE The 3.2 beer license application of the below listed establishment has been investigated in accordance with applicable statutes and ordinances: Cub Foods 6775 York Avenue South Edina, MN 55435 SuperValu Holdings, Inc. 11840 Valley View Road Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Kim Marie Erickson 3430 Oakton Drive Minnetonka, MN 55305 The findings of this investigation do not reveal information that is contrary to the public interest for the purpose of licensing. Michael Siitari Deputy Chief EDINA POLICE DEPARTMENT REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item VI.D. From: Debra Mangen Consent City Clerk Information Only Date: November 17, 1997 Mgr. Recommends To HRA ® To Council Subject: Public Hearing - 1998 Action ® Motion Wine and Beer License Fees r-] Resolution Ordinance Discussion Recommendation: / Motion approving the proposed increases in beer and wine license fees or 1997. Info /Background: At the October 6, 1997 meeting, Council set a hearing date to consider increasing beer and wine license fees for 1998. The attached copy of the public hearing was mailed to all licensees, October 17, 1997, according to Minnesota Statute 340A.408, Subd 3A. The increase is proposed to recover increased cost for staff time in issuance of the license and for inspections by the Police Department. To date, we have received no comment or correspondence from current licensees. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER INCREASING THE FEE FOR ON -SALE WINE LICENSES AND BEER LICENSES The Edina City Council will hold a public hearing on November 17, 1997 at 7:00 P.M. to consider increasing the fee for on -sale wine licensees and also on -sale and off -sale 3.2 beer licenses effective January 1, 1998, as follows: 1997 Fee Proposed 1998 Fee On -Sale Wine: Restaurants with 50 or fewer seats $780 $805 50 -100 seats, inclusive $850 $875 101 -150 seas, inclusive $925 $950 Over 150 seats $985 $1,015 Managers License $72 $75 On Sale 3.2 Beer: Renewal $240 $245 New $300 $310 Off -Sale 3.2 Beer: Renewal $240 $245 New $300 $310 Temporary 3.2 Beer License $52 $55 All persons who desire to be heard on this issue can either: 1. Submit a letter to the Edina City Council, 4801 West 501h Street, Edina, MN 55424, prior to the date of the hearing. 2. Attend the hearing and give testimony. This notice is given in compliance with Minnesota Statute 340A.408, Subd. 3A. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL. Debra Mangen City Clerk Dated: October 17, 1997 TO: Mayor & Council Members FROM: Susan Heiberg DATE: November 17,1997 SUBJECT: APPOINTMENTS TO COMMUNITY COUNCIL REPORURECOMM ENDATION Agenda Item VI.E. Consent 0 Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends Action ❑ To HRA x❑ To Council 0 Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: On behalf of the Human Relations Commission, the following appointments be made to the Edina Resource Center's Community Council: • Senior Center Position: Kay Bach • Business Position: Edward Noonan Background: At the Council Meeting of February 3, 1997, the following appointments were approved to the Community Council: Sharon Ming and Nancy Atchison of the Human Relations Commission; Sharon Marx of Health Advisory; Ken Kane of the Police Department as a provider; and Shirley Hunt - Alexander, representing the religious community. The two remaining appointments were the Senior Center Position and the Business Position. Staff representation on the Council are Ken Rosland or Susan Heiberg, Beth Russell (Assistant Principal of South View), Nancy Delin (Community Education Services), Sandra Stevenson (Director of the Edina Community Resource Center), Ann Boerth (Director of the Family Services Collaborative Support Hub), and Gayle Hallin (Bloomington Public Health). Kay Bach is a new member of the Senior Center Board of Directors. She has been extensively involved in community activities, including former President of the League of Women Voters. Edward Noonan is the owner of Noonan Construction Company. Residing in Edina, two of his three children are in Edina Public Schools. He is President of the Edina Soccer Board and a member of Edina's Construction Board of Appeals. The mission of the Edina Community Council is to. "be a catalyst for Edina community- building efforts to strengthen individuals and families," and the Council is the local collaborative for the Family Services Collaborative. The Edina School District is the designated fiscal agent for the Collaborative, and the Council recommends the spending plan for the community of Edina for revenue derived from the Local Collaborative Time Study. The spending plan has identified the following areas to provide more services to families and children in line with the Edina Community Council's mission: asset building in all the schools, mental health services in all the schools, family and learning support in all the schools, violence prevention in grades kindergarten through fifth, and improved access and coordination of services throughout the community. REPORT /RECOMMENDATION TO: Mayor & Council Members Agenda Item VI.F. 0 FROM: Susan Heiberg Consent ❑ DATE: November 17,1997 Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends To HRA SUBJECT: JOINT MEETING ❑x To Council Action 0 Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: That the Edina City Council attend a meeting with the Human Relations Commission prior to the regular Council Meeting on December 15, 1997. Over a light meal, this meeting would provide an opportunity for introductions and a sharing of ideas and expectations. The Commissioners look forward to seeing you then -5:30 PM in the Manager's Conference Room. However, please advise if another date is preferable. sh To: Mayor & City Council From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: November 17, 1997 Subject: Year End Meeting REPORT /RECOMMENDATION Agenda Item VI.G. Consent Information Only Mgr. Recommends To HRA ® To Council Action ® Motion [] Resolution E] Ordinance Discussion Recommendation: Motion setting Monday, December 29, 1997 at 5:00 p.m. as the year end meeting Info /Background: Annually, the Council must meet during the last week of the year to pay bills and review the projected year end budget status. Staff recommends this year's final meeting be set for Monday, December 29 at 5:00 p.m. in the Managers Conference Room. COUNCIL ;K REGISTER 1. JV -1997 (19:10) page 1 CHECK NO ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 181984 11/17/97 $475.00 50th & FRANCE BUSINESS A 50th business assoc 103197 LIQUOR 50TH ST LIC & PERMITS < *> $475.00* 181985 11/17/97 $159.21 A.M. LEONARD Boots 13474060 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 9370 < *> $159.21* 181986. 11/17/97 $1,254.18 AAA Registration new vehi 110597 EQUIPMENT OPER WELDING SUPPLI < * >' $1,254.18* 181987 11/17/97 $32.18 AARRESTAD, DRU Art work sold 110797 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $32.18* 161988 11/17/97 $124.11 AASEN, LAURIE MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 103197 GOLF ADMINISTR MILEAGE < *> $124.11* 181989 11/17/97 $100.38 ABM EQUIPMENT SUPPLY Parts sweeper 41826 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 9068 < *> $100.38* 181990 11/17/97 $68.33 ACE SUPPLY Parts 120895 BUILDINGS GENERAL SUPPLI 9087 < *> $68.33* 181991 11/17/97 $6,080.00 AIM ELECTRONICS CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 18375 ICE ARENA PROG CIP 8405 < *> $6,080.00* 181992 11/17/97 $437.60 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR Cellulars 10109 /PD POLICE DEPT. G TELEPHONE 11/17/97 $14.14 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR Cellulars 10109 /PD INVESTIGATION TELEPHONE 11/17/97 $35.44 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR Cellulars 10109 /PD ANIMAL CONTROL GENERAL SUPPLI 11/17/97 $27.42 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR TELEPHONE 102097 ED BUILDING & TELEPHONE < *> $514.60* 181993 11/17/97 $101.89 ALL FIRE TEST INC Ext insp 17762 CLUB HOUSE PROF SERVICES < *> $101.89* 181994 11/17/97 $58.60 All Saints Brands COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 2229 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX < *> $58.60* 181995 11/17/97 $175.69 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 103197 CITY HALL GENE LAUNDRY 11/17/97 $236.53 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 103197 FIRE DEPT. GEN LAUNDRY 11/17/97 $14.39 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 103197 LABORATORY LAUNDRY 11/17/97 $48.89 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 103197 VERNON SELLING LAUNDRY 11/17/97 $254.64 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 103197 YORK OCCUPANCY LAUNDRY 11/17/97 $42.10 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 103197 50TH ST OCCUPA LAUNDRY 11/17/97 $164.40 AMERICAN LINEN LAUNDRY 103197/G GRILL LAUNDRY < *> $936.64* 181996 11/17/97 $47.55 Americraft Signs 12933200 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 9212 < *> $47.55* 181997 11/17/97 $30.00 AMM MEETING EXPENSE 110497 ADMINISTRATION MEETING EXPENS 11/17/97 $30.00 AMM MEETING EXPENSE 110497 CITY COUNCIL MEETING EXPENS < *> $60.00* 181998 11/17/97 $1,494.75 ANCHOR PAPER Paper 10495150 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI 9452 < *> $1,494.75* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 12 -NOV -1997 (19:10) page 2 CHECK NO ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 181999 11/17/97 $61.75 Anderson, Gene Art work sold 110797 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $61.75* 182000 11/17/97 $163.74 ANDERSON, TODD RANGE BALLS 102797 GOLF DOME RANGE BALLS < *> $163.74* 182001' 11/17/97 $320.00 AON RISK SERVICES INC OF INSURANCE 197411 CENT SVC GENER INSURANCE 11/17/97 $3,450.00 AON RISK SERVICES INC OF INSURANCE 199309 CENT SVC GENER INSURANCE < *> $3,770.00* 182002 11/17/97 $204.00 APPLIANCE RECYCLING CENT Appliance pickup 12753 SUPERV. & OVRH HAZ. WASTE DIS 8768 < *> $204.00* 182003 11/17/97 $79.00 Applied Concepts Inc EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 23985 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP MAINT 9274 < *> $79.00* 182004 11/17/97 $3.99 Arch Paging Pager for Vince 110197 BUILDING MAINT TELEPHONE < *> $3.99* 182005 11/17/97 $37.95 ARTISTIC FLORAL Gallery supplies 110897 ART SUPPLY GIF GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $37.95* 182006 11/17/97 $433.10 ASAP MAILING SERVICES Bulk mailing 71021 CENT SVC GENER POSTAGE 5897 < *> $433.10* 182007 11/17/97 $190.40 ASCAP License fee 110497 ED ADMINISTRAT DUES & SUBSCRI < *> $190.40* 182008 11/1.7/97 $27.30 ASHFORD, CINDY Art work sold 110797 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $27.30* 182009 11/17/97 $235.37 ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO. Control box 229571 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 9399 < *> $235.37* 182010 11/17/97 $50.00 Assigned Risk Safety Acc Penalty assessments 102197 GOLF ADMINISTR PROF SERVICES < *> $50.00* 182011 11/17/97 $15.34 ASTLEFORD EQUIPMENT COMP Bolt /nut T53703 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 11/17/97 $185.71 ASTLEFORD EQUIPMENT COMP Shackle T60858 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 9382 < *> $201.05* 182012 11/17/97 $14.30 AT &T TELEPHONE 101897 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE 11/17/97 $5.48 AT &T TELEPHONE 101897 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE 11/17/97 $7.89 AT &T TELEPHONE 101897 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE 11/17/97 $5.33 AT &T TELEPHONE 101897 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE 11/17/97 $21.60 AT &T TELEPHONE 102497 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE 11/17/97 $1.46 AT &T TELEPHONE 102497 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE < *> $56.06* 182013 11/17/97 $33.00 AUTOMOBILE SF.RVTCE COMPA Alignment 9984 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 9397 < *> $33.00* 182014 11/17/97 $387.00 AutoTruck Service Co Repair work 82288 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 8736 < *> $387.00* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 12 -NOV -1997 (19:10) page 3 CHECK NO -----------------------------:------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 182015 11/17/97 $38.35 AVERY, CYNTHIA Art work sold 110797 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $38.35* 182016 .11/17/97 $9,757.19 AVW Group Projector /camera MN229790 CONTINGENCIES NEW EQUIP 8543 < *> $9,757.19* 182017. 11/17/97 $939.82 BACHMANS PLANTINGS & TREES 112295. RICHARDS MAINT PLANT & TREES 8290 11/17/97 $148.00 BACHMANS PLANTINGS & TREES 112295 RICHARDS'MAINT PLANT & TREES 11/17/97 $281.69 BACHMANS Memorial fund 115542 GOLF PROG MEN'S CLUB 8976 11/17/97 $492.20 BACHMANS Replacement tree 00107050 TREES & MAINTE PLANT & TREES 9163 < *> $1,861.71* 182018 11/17/97 $44.53 BARTOLETTI, SUE Art work sold 110797 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $44.53* 182019 11/17/97 $220.03 Battery Wholesale Inc battery 18576 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 9389 11/17/97 $51.56 Battery Wholesale Inc Batteries golf car 18643 GOLF CARS REPAIR PARTS 9261 < *> $271.59* 182020 11/17/97 $350.00 BCA /Training & Developme CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS T004556 DARE CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $350.00* 182021 11/17/97 $63.14 BEARCOM GENERAL SUPPLIES 900475 RESERVE PROGRA GENERAL SUPPLI 8877 < *> $63.14* 182022 11/17/97 $300.00 Becker Arena Products GENERAL SUPPLIES 6612 ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPLI 9506 < *> $300.00* 182023 11/17/97 $26.55 Beer Connoisser Beer connoisseur 002525 LIQUOR 50TH ST DUES & SUBSCRI < *> $26.55* 182024 11/17/97 $447.12 BELLBOY CORPORATION PAPER SUPPLIES 26256101 YORK SELLING PAPER SUPPLIES 11/17/97 $22.50 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 26514000 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 11/17/97 $123.95 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 26514200 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 11/17/97 $18.00 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 26516800 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 11/17/97 $45.50 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 12993800 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 11/17/97 $122.00 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 12993900 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 11/17/97 $132.72 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 26552200 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 11/17/97 $67.55 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 26552500 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 11/17/97 $70.72 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 26552600 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 11/17/97 $24.50 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 13049400 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 11/17/97 $117.53 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 26592100 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 11/17/97 $71.80 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 26592300 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $1,263.89* 182025 11/17/97 $120.90 BENN, BRADLEY Art work sold 110797 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $120.90* 182026 11/17/97 $85.60 BERGFORD TRUCKING Liquor delivery 103197/5 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 11/17/97 $172.10 BERGFORD TRUCKING Liquor delivery 103197/V VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 11/17/97 $179.70 BERGFORD TRUCKING Liquor delivery 103197/Y YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU < *> $437.40* 182028 11/17/97 $33.19 BERTELSON BROS. INC. Sharpener 4932840 STREET NAME SI GENERAL SUPPLI 9149 11/17/97 $230.04 BERTELSON BROS. INC. CRAFT SUPPLIES 4996010 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES 9007 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 12 -NUV- 1997 (19:10) page 4 .CHECK NO ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR -DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 182028 11/17/97 $142:87 BERTELSON BROS. INC.- GENERAL SUPPLIES 5005490- CENT SVC GENER- GENERAL SUPPLI 9149 11/17/97 $399.59 BERTELSON BROS. INC. Transcriber, - 5006060 RECYCLING EQUIP REPLACEM. 11/17/97 $7.41 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 5007790 'CENT'SVC- 'GENER GENERAL SUPPLI 11/17/97 $58.46 BERTELSON BROS. INC. Markers, ems bags" 5015670 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 9234 11/17/97 $109.91 BERTELSON BROS. INC. Coffee urn FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 9234 11/17/97" $5.68 BERTELSON BROS. INC. FIRST AID SUPPLIES 5015671 FIRE DEPT. GEN.FIRST AID SUPP 9234 11/.17/97 •$36:15 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 5028480 POLICE DEPT. G OFFICE SUPPLIE 9459 —11/17/97 $44.57.. BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 5029510 ARENA BLDG /GRO OFFICE SUPPLIE 9399 11/17/97. $102..75 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 5028471 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI 9595 11/17/97 $15.25 BERTELSON,BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES- 5029171 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI 9595 11/17/97 $166.12 - BERTELSON BROS. INC. Remodeling - 5035620 CITY HALL EQUIP REPLACEM 9612 11/17/97 $63.74' BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 5037660._CENT-SVC GENER'GENERAL- SUPPLI 9595 11/17/97 $49.23 BERTELSON BROS.'. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES.. 5039070 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI < *> -$1,464.96* 182029 11/17/97 $18.45 Best Access Systems of M GENERAL SUPPLIES 55537 -, ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPLI 9505 < *> $18.45 *, 182030 11/17/97 $99.69 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS BLACKTOP " 75940 -GENERAL MAINT BLACKTOP 11/17/97 $202.15 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS. BLACKTOP 75940 PKBOND`CIP BLACKTOP 11/17/97 $2,018.75 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS BLACKTOP 75940 PARKING LOTS BLACKTOP 11/17/97 $4,195.69 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 75941 PKBOND CIP EQUIP REPLACEM 11/17/97 $414.95 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS" BLACKTOP 75.941 DISTRIBUTION BLACKTOP 11/17/97 $516.41 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT-75942 PKBOND-CIP EQUIP REPLACEM 11/17/97 $272.02 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS BLACKTOP 75942 DISTRIBUTION BLACKTOP < *> $7,719.66* 18203.1 11/17/97 .$314.50 BJORK STONE CONTRACTED REPAIRS.. 0097 GENERAL MAINT 'CONTR REPAIRS < *> $314.50* 182032 11/17/97 $29.90 Blalock, Karen Art work sold 110797' ART CNTR PROG -SALES OTHER, < *> $29.90* 182033 11/17/97 $100.00 BLOOD, DAVID -, Police sery NOV 1997 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES < *> $100.00* 182034 11/1.7/97 $43.82 BLUHM, KIMBERLEE Art work sold 110797 ART CNTR PROG SALES•OTHER < *> $43.82* 182035 11/17/97 $32.50 Boraas, Christa Art work sold 110797 ART,CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $32.50* 182036 11/17/97 $123.54 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC S REPAIR PARTS 10237552 50TH ST OCCUPA'REPAIR PARTS < *> .$123.54* 182037 11/17/97 $600.00 BOY SCOUT OF AMERICA Meeting expenses- 103097, RESERVE PROGRA MEETING EXPENS < *> $600.00* 182038 11/17/97 _$78.34 BOYER TRUCKS Flap „650907 - EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR -PARTS < *> $78.34* 182039 11/17/97, $125.04 BRAEMAR PRINTING PRINTING 49457 FRED RICHARDS -- 11/17/97 $175.08 BRAEMAR.- PRINTING OFFICE SUPPLIES 49478 .PRINTING _GOLF DOME ' OFFICE SUPPLIE 9445 11/17/97 $54.83 BRAEMAR PRINTING PRINTING 49459 GOLF ADMINISTR PRINTING 9438 < *> $354.95* COUNCIL -:K REGISTER 1_ JV -1997 (19:10) page 5 CHECK NO --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 182040 11/17/97 $154.37 Brandess Kalt Aetna Grou COST OF GOODS SOLD 665674 ART SUPPLY GIF COST OF GD SOL 9290 < *> $154.37* 182041 11/17/97 $600.00 BRAUN INTERTEC Prof eng sery 096021 PKBOND CIP EQUIP REPLACEM 11/17/97 $75.00 BRAUN INTERTEC Lead analysis 043333 PUBLIC HEALTH PROF SERVICES <*> $675.00* 182042. 11/17/97 $140.58 BRENT'S SIGNS DISPLAY & Signage 287 GOLF DOME GENERAL SUPPLI 9442 11/17/97 $303.53 BRENT'S SIGNS DISPLAY & GENERAL SUPPLIES 302 GOLF DOME GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $444.11* 182043 11/17/97 $177.92 BRISSMAN- KENNEDY INC CLEANING SUPPLIES 486926 ART CENTER BLD CLEANING SUPPL 9001 < *> $177.92* 182044 11/17/97 11/17/97 $115.02 $820.27 Brock White Brock White Column form 1655901 ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPLI 9256 < *> $935.29* Insulator blankets 2570401 PKBOND CIP EQUIP REPLACEM 182045 11/17/97 $90.52 Brockman Trucking Trailer 15188 LIQUOR YORK GE PROF SERVICES < *> $90.52* 182046 11/17/97 $28.60 BROCKWAY, MAUREEN Art work sold 110797 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $28.60* 182047 11/17/97 $5,779.53 Browning Ferris Industri Refuse 103197 50TH STREET RU PROF SERVICES < *> $5,779.53* 182048 11/17/97 $920.37 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC Ballfield lime 100697 FIELD MAINTENA SAND,GRVL & RO 9177 11/17/97 $257.82 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC Ag -lime for Braemar 159640 FIELD MAINTENA INFIELD MIX 9560 < *> $1,178.19* 182049 11/17/97 $459.32 BUDGET LIGHTING GENERAL SUPPLIES 120628 ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPLI 9255 < *> $459.32* 182050 11/17/97 182051 11/17/97 182052 11/17/97 182053 11/17/97 11/17/97 182054 11/17/97 182055 11/17/97 182056 11/17/97 $80.60 $80.60* $1,250.00 $1,250.00* $100.00 $100.00* BUELL, KIM Art work sold 110797 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER Bush Communication for M PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5092 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES BUTLER, GEORGE Police sery NOV 1997 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES $79.70 C.S. MCCROSSAN CONSTRUCT Wear $131.60 C.S. MCCROSSAN CONSTRUCT BLACKTOP $211.30* $89.00 CADY COMMUNICATIONS $89.00* $40.00 CALHOUN ISLES COM BAND $40.00* $363.42 CALLAWAY GOLF $363.42* 4236 GENERAL MAINT BLACKTOP 004278 GENERAL MAINT BLACKTOP TELEPHONE 233399 CLUB HOUSE TELEPHONE Service Edinborough 112397 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER COST OF GOODS - PRO S 90082668 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 3934 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 12 -NuV -1997 (19:10) page 6 CHECK NO ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION. INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 182058 11/17/97 $301.84 Camas Concrete 1029109 DISTRIBUTION BLACKTOP 5582 11/17/97 $652.54 Camas Curbing 1029110 PKBOND CIP EQUIP REPLACEM 5582 11/17/97 $373.76 Camas Blacktop 1029111 PARKING LOTS BLACKTOP 5582 11/17/97 $1,367.23 Camae Concrete 1029733 PKBOND CIP EQUIP REPLACEM 11/17/97 $507.83 Camas Concrete 1029734 - DISTRIBUTION CONCRETE 5582 11/17/97 .$497.18 Camas Concrete 1029736 DISTRIBUTION CONCRETE 5582 11/17/97 $835.60 Camas EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 1030309 PKBOND CIP EQUIP REPLACEM 11/17/97 $435.03 Camas Concrete 1030310 DISTRIBUTION CONCRETE 5582 11/17/97 $514.22 Camas Concrete 1030311 PKBOND CIP EQUIP REPLACEM 11/17/97 $331.78 Camas Class 2 1521468 DISTRIBUTION FILL MATERIALS 5440 11/17197 $530.28 Camas Concrete 1031629 PKBOND CIP EQUIP REPLACEM 5582 11/17/97 $385.66 Camas Concrete 1032425 PKBOND CIP EQUIP REPLACEM 5582 11/17/91 $385.66 Camas Concrete 1032426 PKBOND CIP EQUIP REPLACEM 5582 11/17/97 $1,106.21 Camas Concrete 1032427 PKBOND CIP EQUIP REPLACEM 5582 11/17/97 $379.27 Camas Concrete 1032428 PKBOND CIP EQUIP REPLACEM 5582 . < *> $8,604.09* 182059 11/17/97 $684.60 CAMPBELL GROUP, THE Uniforms 16975 ED BUILDING & LAUNDRY 9271 11/17/97 $988.49 CAMPBELL GROUP, THE Rental gifts- glasses 16959 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 9127 11/17/97 $406.80 CAMPBELL GROUP, THE Uniforms 16974 ED BUILDING & LAUNDRY 9510 < +> $2,.079.89* 182060 .11/17/97 $50.00 CANTON, JANET MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 111097 FINANCE MILEAGE < *> $50.00* 182061 11/17/97 $434.40 CARLSON, KENNETH UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 103097 POLICE DEPT. G UNIF ALLOW < *> $434.40* 182062 11/17/97 $22.37 CATCO Fittings 352332 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 9188 11/17/97 $112.31 CATCO Fittings 352980 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 9378 11/17/97 $356..99 CATCO Fittings 354134 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 9362 < *> $491.67* 182063 11/17/97 $108.00 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE Printing Police 103097 POLICE DEPT. G PRINTING < *> $108.00* 182064 11/17/97 $185.00 CITY OF EDINA Refuse 3508 50TH ST OCCUPA RUBBISH REMOVA < *> $185.00* 182065 11/17/97 $25.56 City Wide Window Service Window cleaning 106418 YORK SELLING CONTR REPAIRS 11/17/97 $15.71 City Wide Window Service Window cleaning 106419 VERNON SELLING CONTR REPAIRS .11/17/97 $15.71 City Wide Window Service Window cleaning - 106420 50TH ST SELLIN CONTR REPAIRS < *> $56.98* 182066 11/17/97 $171.80 COFFEE INN'OF MINNESOTA Coffee mach 44390 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 9300 < *> $171.80* 182067 11/17/97 $296.64 COMPRESS AIR & EQUIPMENT Valves utility 44911 PUMP & LIFT ST REPAIR PARTS 8767 < *> $296.64* 182068 11/17/97 $24.50 COMPUTER CITY ACCOUNT RE DATA PROCESSING' 130272 POLICE DEPT. G DATA PROCESSIN 9460 < *> $24.50* 182069 11/17/97 $599.13 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS Earmuffs 449501 GENERAL MAINT SAFETY EQUIPME 9215 11/17/97 $285.75 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS Ear plug 453174 GENERAL MAINT SAFETY EQUIPME 9065 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 12 -NOV -1997 (19:10) 7 page CHECK NO -----------------------------:------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 182069 11/17/97 $280.01 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS Dispenser 458069 STREET REVOLVI GENERAL SUPPLI 9129 11/17/97 $254.94 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS Goggles /respirator 460226 GENERAL MAINT SAFETY EQUIPME 9149 < *> $1,419.83* 182070 11/17/97 $75.00 Conolle, Kelly Prof sere AC 110897 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $75.00* 182071 11/17/97 $314.18 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS I Waterproofing M036624 STREET RENOVAT GENERAL SUPPLI 9262 < *> $314.18* 182072 11/17/97 $23,750.00 COOL AIR MECHANICAL Arena construction 7 PKBOND CIP EQUIP REPLACEM < *> $23,750.00* 182073 11/17/97 $57.11 COPY EQUIPMENT INC. Blueline paper 0072356 ENGINEERING GE BLUE PRINTING 9474 11/17/97 $1,516.17 COPY EQUIPMENT INC. Computer work station 0072471 ENGINEERING GE EQUIP REPLACEM 8602 < *> $1,573.28* 182074 11/17/97 $1,386.67 CRIMMINS MD, TIMOTHY J Medical sery NOV 1997 FIRE DEPT. GEN PROF SERVICES < *> $1,386.67* 182075 11/17/97 $2,965.73 Curtis 1000 Utility envelopes 15192501 GENERAL(BILLIN GENERAL SUPPLI 9105 < *> $2,965.73* 182076 11/17/97 $151.77 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO. Repair parts 092372 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 9259 < *> $151.77* 182077 11/17/97 $155.28 CY'S UNIFORMS Uniform badge 0025421 FIRE DEPT. GEN UNIF ALLOW 9222 < *> $155.28* 182078 11/17/97 $868.52 Dahlheimer Distributing COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 94791 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 11/17/97 $456.75 Dahlheimer Distributing COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 95145 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE < *> $1,325.27* 182079 11/17/97 $456.89 DALCO CORPORATION Part 908992 BUILDING MAINT REPAIR PARTS 9184 < *> $456.89* 182080 11/17/97 $37.90 DANN DEE DISPLAY FIXTURE GENERAL SUPPLIES 898419 ART SUPPLY GIF GENERAL SUPPLI 9079 < *> $37.90* 182081 11/17/97 $1,182.40 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 19648 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 11/17/97 $2,024.95 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 19697 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 11/17/97 $1,582.50 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 19757 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 11/17/97 $40.40 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 19758 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 11/17/97 $993.85 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 20113 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 11/17/97 $3,138.55 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 20124 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 11/17/97 $189.95 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 20133 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 11/17/97 $20.20 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 20134 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE < *> $9,172.80* 182082 11/17/97 $38.35 DAY - TIMERS INC. Daytimer refil 27758541 ED ADMINISTRAT OFFICE SUPPLIE 9511 < *> $38.35* 182083 11/17/97 $891.70 DCA INC Fee for service 96884 CENT SVC GENER HOSPITALIZATIO 11/17/97 $906.50 DCA INC Fee for service 98134 CENT SVC GENER HOSPITALIZATIO < *> $1,798.20* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 12 -NuV -1997 (19:10) page 8 CHECK NO ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 182084 11/17/97 $727.40 DENNYS 5th AV BAKERY COST OF GOODS SOLD 103197 GRILL COST OF GD SOL < *> $727.40* 182085 11/17/97 $259.82 Department of Administat MNET -911 W9709138 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE < *> $259.82* 18209.6' 11/17/97 $53.50 DIAMOND ART & CRAFT DIST COST OF GOODS SOLD 166498 ART SUPPLY GIF COST OF GD SOL 9011 < *> $53.50* 182087 11/17/97 - $214.00 DIESEL SERVICE CO Credit t CS138558 EQUIPMENT.OPER REPAIR PARTS 11/17/97 '$592.21 DIESEL SERVICE CO Part DSI69389 EQUIPMENT -OPER REPAIR PARTS 9191 < *> $378.21* 182088 11/17/97 $85.00 DOER /Human Rights Confer Annual human rights c 102797 ADMINISTRATION CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $85.00* 182089 11/17%97 $180.18 DPD_ PRINTING 69301 ARENA ADMINIST PRINTING 9518 " < *> $180.18* 182090 11/17/97 $1,820.00 Duraflex International C Refinish diving board 49099 SWIM PROG MACH. & EQUIP < *> $1,820.00* 182091 11/17/97 $56.31 E -Z -GO TEXTRON REPAIR PARTS 0491124 GOLF-CARS REPAIR PARTS 9340 11/17/97 $24.73 E -Z -GO TEXTRON Cart repair parts 0492497 GOLF CARS REPAIR PARTS 9341 < *> $81.04* 182094 11/17/97 $7.00 EAGLE WINE COST OF .GOODS SOLD WI 06046. YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/17/97 $461.80 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 24708 YORK SELLING CST OF GD,WINE 11/17/97 -'$114.12 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 73834 50TH ST SELLIN-CST OF GD LIQU 11/17/97 -$4.91 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 73931 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 11/17/97 $495.70. EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 27914. 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 11/17/97 $283.01 EAGLE WINE- COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 27915 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE, 11/17/97 $514.15 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 27920 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/17/97 $805.57 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 27921 VERNON.SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/17/97 $185.51 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 27927 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/17/97 -$9.63 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 74081 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 11/17/97 $2,137.50 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 28960 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/17/97 .$498.50 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 29565 50TH'ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 11/17/97 •$997.00 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 29573 YORK "SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/17/97 $14.00 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 29774 YORK'SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/17/97 - $10.20 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 74403 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 11/17/97 - $87.68 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS'SOLD LI 74404 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 11/17/97 $397.20 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 31242 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 11/17/97 $652.69 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 31250 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 11/17/97 $314.25 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 31251 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/17/97 $515.46 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 31259 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/17/97 $487.15 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 31260 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/17/97 $750.35 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 31268 YORK SELLING CST OF- GD.WINE 11/17/97 -$2.66 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 74739 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/17/97 - $101.38 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 74784 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 11/17/97 - $14.27 EAGLE WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 74820 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE < *> $9,171.99* 182095 11/17/97 $149.01 EARL'F.- ANDERSON- Paint 4872 PAVEMENT MARKI PAINT 9046 < *> $149.01* COUNCIL -__..CK REGISTER 1- ..OV -1997 (19:10) page 9 CHECK NO ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 182096 11/17/97 $35,770.16 Earl Weikle & Sons Inc Construction 9711PK #2 PKBOND CIP EQUIP REPLACEM < *> $35,770.16* 182097 11/17/97 $43.00 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 221175 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 11/17/97 $327.20 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 221176 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 11/17/97 $5,764.00 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 221177 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 11/17/97 $4,193.35 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 221178 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 11/17/97 $2,075.35 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 224058 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 11/17/97 $4,008.85 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 224065 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 11/17/97 $2,072.90 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 224066 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 11/17/97 $139.00 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 224906 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 11/17/97 $1,281.00 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 225476 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE < *> $19,904.65* 182098 11/17/97 $116.94 ECOLAB PEST ELIMINATION SERVICE CONTRACTS EQU 5019860 ED BUILDING & SVC CONTR EQUI 11/17/97 $99.15 ECOLAB PEST ELIMINATION Pest elimination 5019866 ED BUILDING & SVC CONTR EQUI < *> $216.09* 182099 11/17/97 $102.12 EDINA LIQUOR STORE /VERNO GENERAL SUPPLIES 102197 ART CENTER ADM GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $102.12* 182100 11/17/97 $222.00 EDMUNDS, LIZ COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 102197 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $222.00* 182101 11/17/97 $123.89 EIDEM, KRIS UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 110497 POLICE DEPT. G UNIF ALLOW < *> $123.89* 182102 11/17/97 $214.80 ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIR Magnetic 234687 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 9143 < *> $214.80* 182103 11/17/97 $143.67 ELK RIVER CONCRETE PRODU Gasket 130957 PARKING LOTS GENERAL SUPPLI 9260 < *> $143.67* 182104 11/17/97 $10.12 ELVIN SAFETY Dust filters 22838301 PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPLI 9140 < *> $10.12* 182105 11/17/97 $1,077.03 Erickson Architects Arch sery 110397 TRAINING FACIL EQUIP REPLACEM < *> $1,077.03* 182106 11/17/97 $51.77 ERICKSON, MARY Art work sold 110797 ART CNTR FROG SALES OTHER < *> $51.77* 182107 11/17/97 $29.82 FASTSIGN GENERAL SUPPLIES 9092 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 9512 < *> $29.82* 182108 11/17/97 $6,780.51 Fenc -CO Inc Construction 97 -8PKFN PKBOND CIP EQUIP REPLACEM < *> $6,780.51* 182109 11/17/97 $32.00 FINE GARDENING Subscription 103097 GOLF ADMINISTR DUES & SUBSCRI < *> $32.00* 182110 11/17/97 $153.02 FIRE SPECIALTIES COMPANY Seals 2453 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 9237 < *> $153.02* 182111 11/17/97 $1,958.48 FISCHER AGGREGATES INC SAND GRAVEL & ROCK 5630 SNOW & ICE REM SAND,GRVL & RO COUNCIL CHECt, REGISTER 12 -..-,1 -1997 (19:10) page 10 CHECK NO DATE -CHECK'AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE ,PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. ------------------------------------ < *> $1,958.48* ------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------- 182112 11/17/97 $273.36 FISHER SCIENTIFIC Lab supplies 9304053 LABORATORY GENERAL SUPPLI 9150 11/17/97 $402.60 FISHER SCIENTIFIC Lab supplies 9345829 LABORATORY GENERAL SUPPLI 9150 < *> $675.96* 182113•-11/17/97 $442.47 Flasher Handling Corp Shop sign 65561 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 9097 < *> $442:47* 182114 11/17/97_ "$971.06 FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL COMPA Sewer rods 4169 SEWER CLEANING REPAIR PARTS 8904. < *> $971.06* 182115 11/17/97 $748.03 FOOT -JOY 'COST OF GOODS PROS 5308029 -PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 1159 < *> $748.03* 182116 11/17/97 $28.69 Force America Element 110911 EQU3:PMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 9362 < *> $28.69* " 182117 11/17/97" $72,120:00 FRANK J. ZAMBONI Final zamboni 093097, ICE ARENA PROG CIP < *> $7.2,120.00* 182118 11/17/97 $305.12 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY -OFFICE SUPPLIES 70191353 ADMINISTRATION OFFICE SUPPLIE 11/17/97 $29.82 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY GENERAL SUPPLIES 70191345 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $334.94* 182119 11/3.7/97 $26,561.05 Friedges Landscaping Inc Construction 97 -10PK# PKBOND CIP EQUIP - REPLACEM < *> $26,561.05* 182120 11/17/97 $12,259.00 Friedges Landscaping'Inc "Construction 97 -6PK #4 PKBOND CIP EQUIP REPLACEM < *> $12,259.00* 182121 11/17/97 '$256.76 FRONT -IER COMMUNICATIONS -TELEPHONE 110697 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE < *> $256.76* 182122 11/17/97,. $150.00 G & T TRUCKING. COMPANY Transport dozer 119103 GENERAL MAINT ,EQUIP.RENTAL 8774 < *> - $150.00* - 182123 11/17/97, $1,852.65 G.L. CONTRACTING INC Dig for water main re 35344_ DISTRIBUTION CONTR REPAIRS 9091 < *> $1,852.65* '182124 11/17/97 $57.16 Glass "& Mirror Outlet In GENERAL SUPPLIES- 12955 ART SUPPLY GIF GENERAL SUPPLI 9238 < *> $57.16,k = 182125 11/17/97 $7,046.50 GLOBAL SPECIALTY CONTRAC.Construction 96 -SPKFN PKBOND,CIP EQUIP REPLACEM < *> $7,046.501* 182126 11/17/9.7 $50.93 GOLF FOR WOMEN. Magazine subscription 110397 GOLF ADMINISTR DUES & SU13SCRI < *> $50.93* 182127 11/17/97 $158.44 GOODMAN., NANCY. Art.work'sold ]]0797 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $158.44* 182128 11/17/97 $288.75 GOPHER STATE 1 CALL Gopher state 7090245 - SUPERV. & OVRH GOPHER STATE." < *> $288.75* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 12 -NOV -1997 (19:10) page 11 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 182129 11/17/97 $45.72 GRAINGER Casters 49597295 CITY HALL GENE GENERAL SUPPLI 9181 11/17/97 $510.57 GRAINGER Part pool 49597332 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 8692 11/17/97 $717.41 GRAINGER Sprayer /hose 49597753 PUMP & LIFT ST TOOLS 9357 11/17/97 $59.91 GRAINGER Hose 49875691 CLUB HOUSE GENERAL SUPPLI 9357 11/17/97 $48.23 GRAINGER Gas can 49598128 GENERAL MAINT SAFETY EQUIPME 9049 11/17/97 $36.30 GRAINGER Brush /handle 49875882 STREET REVOLVI GENERAL SUPPLI 9366 11/17/97 $33.09 GRAINGER Drill bits 49875947 ED BUILDING & TOOLS 9029 11/17/97 $163.48 GRAINGER GENERAL SUPPLIES 49876018 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 9031 < *> $1,614.71* 182130 11/17/97 $203.00 Grand Pere Wines Inc COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1089 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $203.00* 182131 11/17/97 $359.00 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 16361 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/17/97 $73.00 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 16469 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/17/97 $85.00 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 16470 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 11/17/97 $638.00 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 16523 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/17/97 $211.00 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 16559 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 11/17/97 $1,058.00 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 16646 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $2,424.00* 182132 11/17/97 $172.57 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. Parts 50081089 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 9178 11/17/97 $100.52 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. Courtney fields 10490682 FIELD MAINTENA REPAIR PARTS 9044 < *> $273.09* 182133 11/17/97 $32.66 GREER, PAT Art work sold 110797 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $32.66* 182136 11/17/97 $1,088.32 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 26377 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 11/17/97 $92.70 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 27910 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 11/17/97 $441.62 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 27911 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 11/17/97 $562.50 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 27913 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 11/17/97 $33.90 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 27916 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 11/17/97 $5,537.20 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 27917 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 11/17/97 $1,837.33 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 27919 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 11/17/97 $371.25 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 27922 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 11/17/97 $93.26 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 27923 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 11/17/97 $3,266.49 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 27924 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 11/17/97 $1,215.62 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 27925 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 11/17/97 $24.31 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 27926 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 11/17/97 $158.51 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 29569 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 11/17/97 $17.04 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 31244 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 11/17/97 $2,433.71 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 31245 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 11/17/97 $67.55 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 31247 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 11/17/97 $1,174.11 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 31248 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 11/17/97 $122.81 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 31249 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 11/17/97 $33.45 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 31252 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 11/17/97 $2,703.11 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 31254 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 11/17/97 $9.08 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 31257 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 11/17/97 $2,907.09 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 31258 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 11/17/97 $68.16 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOI..D LI 31261 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 11/17/97 $2,764.63 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 31262 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 11/17/97 $67.29 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 31265 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 11/17/97 $3,528.25 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 31266 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 11/17/97 $68.29 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 31267 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 12 -NOV -1997 (19:10) page 12 CHECK NO - ----- - DATE - - - -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM < *> $30,707.58* ----- - -- - -- 182137 11/17/97 $107.25 GRIMSBY, NANCY Art work sold 110797 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $107.25* 182138 ' 11/17/97 $2,785.00 GRUSSING ROOFING INC New roof 110597 CDBG PROG PROF SERVICES < * >" $2,785.00* 182139 11/17/97 $395.97 HALLMAN OIL COMPANY Windshield solvent 3006 EQUIPMENT OPER FILL MATERIALS 9390 < *> $395.97* 182140 11/17/97 $159.75 Hardwood Creek Lumber In Survey lath 1393 ENGINEERING GE LUMBER 8882 < *> $159.75* 182141 11/17/97 $393.76 HARMON AUTOGLASS Windshield 72003515 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 9385 < *> $393.76* 182142 11/17/97 $27.99 HARMON FULL SERVICE GROU Caulk 323227 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 9317 < *> $27.99* 182143 11/17/97 $17,028.00 HARRIS HOMEYER CO. INSURANCE 2893 CENT SVC GENER INSURANCE 11/17/97 $16,107.00 HARRIS HOMEYER CO. INSURANCE 2894 CENT SVC GENER INSURANCE < *> $33,135.00* 182144 11/17/97 $5,448.35 Hartland Fuel Products L Fuel 188562 PKBOND CIP EQUIP REPLACEM 11/17/97 $7,404.15 Hartland Fuel Products L Fuel 188564 PKBOND CIP EQUIP REPLACEM < *> $12,852.50* 182145 11/17/97 $122.69 HAYDEN - MURPHY EQUIPMENT Pipe gaskets C57101 PONDS & LAKES REPAIR PARTS 9173 < *> $122.69* 182146 11/17/97 $648.00 HAYNES, PATRICIA Gallery Pt 110897 ART SUPPLY GIF PROF SERVICES < *> $648.00* 182147 11/17/97 $66.30 HAYWA, PHYLLIS Art work sold 110797 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $66.30* 182148 11/17/97 $41,550.37 HEALTH PARTNERS HOSPITALIZATION 7231062 CENT SVC GENER HOSPITALIZATIO < *> $41,550.37* 182149 11/17/97 $134.10 HEIMARK FOODS COST OF GOODS SOLD 103197 GRILL COST OF GD SOL < *> $134.10* 182150 11/17/97 $11.00 HELMER, RICHARD Class B Driver licens 110497 FIRE DEPT. GEN LIC & PERMITS < *> $11.00* 182151 11/17/97 $1,472.12 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF Booking fee 102797 LEGAL SERVICES COURT CHARGES < *> $1,472.12* 182152 11/17/97 $3,591.96 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURE Room & Board 1514 LEGAL SERVICES BRD & RM PRISO < *> $3,591.96* 182153 11/17/97 $642.00 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLE Training 31727 FIRE DEPT. GEN CON? & SCHOOLS 8418 < *> $642.00* COUNCIL 1... -CK REGISTER 12 -NOV -1997 (19:10) page 13 CHECK NO -------------------------$----------------------------------------------------- DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 182154 11/17/97 $100.00 HOFFMAN, WILLIAM Police sery -------------------------------------------- NOV 1997 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES < *> $100.00* 182155 11/17/97 $997.00 HONEYWELL INC Furnace repair 378PT243 GOLF DOME CONTR REPAIRS < *> $997.00* 1821$6, 11/17/97 $2,238.00 HONEYWELL INC Energy saving guar 221PT798 GOLF DOME SVC CONTR EQUI 11/17/97 $4,565.00 HONEYWELL INC Energy saving guar 221PT798 ARENA ADMINIST PROF SERVICES 11/17/97 $2,148.00 HONEYWELL INC Energy saving guar 221PT798 ED BUILDING & SVC CONTR EQUI < *> $8,951.00* 182157 11/17/97 $250.83 Honsa Lighting Fly light 152911 ED BUILDING & REPAIR PARTS 9023 < *> $250.83* 182158 11/17/97 $480.00 HOPKINS COMMUNITY EDUCAT File mgmt training 1400 CENT SVC GENER CONF a SCHOOLS 11/17/97 $360.00 HOPKINS COMMUNITY EDUCAT File mgmt training 1401 CENT SVC GENER CONF & SCHOOLS 11/17/97 $972.00 HOPKINS COMMUNITY EDUCAT Power point training 1402 CENT SVC GENER CONF & SCHOOLS 11/17/97 $504.00 HOPKINS COMMUNITY EDUCAT Win 95 Training 1403 CENT SVC GENER CONF & SCHOOLS 11/17/97 $864.00 HOPKINS COMMUNITY EDUCAT Excel 95 training 1403A CENT SVC GENER CONF a SCHOOLS 11/17/97 $1,188.00 HOPKINS COMMUNITY EDUCAT Word training 1399 CENT SVC GENER CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $4,368.00* 182159 11/17/97 $153.83 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL Chlorine DE 15350 ED BUILDING & CHEMICALS 9025 11/17/97 $114.38 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL CHEMICALS 15524 ED BUILDING & CHEMICALS 11/17/97 $74.23 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL CHEMICALS. 15568 ED BUILDING & CHEMICALS 9506 < *> $342.44* 182160 11/17/97 $46.24 HUEBSCH Rugs 421329 ED BUILDING & SVC CONTR EQUI < *> $46.24* 182161 11/17/97 $982.91 HYDRAULIC COMPONENT SERV Recondition motor 12773 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 11/17/97 - $398.00 HYDRAULIC COMPONENT SERV Credit 12823 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS .8945 < *> $584.'91* 182162 11/17/97 $49.96 HYDRO SUPPLY CO Wire supplies 11857 METER REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLI 6388 11/17/97 $84.67 HYDRO SUPPLY CO Wire 11858 METER REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLI 6388 < *> $134.63* 182163 11/17/97 $50.00 Ice Skating Institute Membership renewal 103097 ED ADMINISTRAT DUES & SUBSCRI < *> $50.00* 182164 11/17/97 $10.00 IKON CAPITAL Shartage on invoice 38867562 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 11/17/97 $5.00 IKON CAPITAL EQUIPMENT RENTAL 38887446 ART CENTER ADM EQUIP RENTAL < *> $15.00* 182165 11/17/97 $33.10 Ikon Office Solutions Copies, etc 975261 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 5258 < *> $33.10* 182166 11/17/97 $51.64 J.H. LARSON ELECTRICAL C Hub /bushing 40330230 PKBOND CIP EQUIP REPLACEM 9066 11/17/97 $134.19 J.H. LARSON ELECTRICAL C Electrical 4034627 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 9144 < *> $185.83* 182167 11/17/97 $6,273.00 JAMES STEELE CONSTRUCTIO Fire station II 102997 NEW STATION EQUIP REPLACEM < *> $6,273.00* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 111797 GRILL 12 -NOV -1997 (19:10) GD SOL- page 14 CHECK NO, DATE ---------------------------------------- CHECK.AMOUNT ADAPTIVE RECRE VENDOR - - - - - -- ----------------------------------------------=--------------------------- DESCRIPTION INVOICE- PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 182168 11/17/97 $100.00 ;--- JAMES WILLIAM F Police service NOV 1997 RESERVE PROGRA - - - - --- PERS SERVICES < *> - $100.00* GENERAL SUPPLIES• 111797. GOLF DOME GENERAL'SUPPLI 182169 11/17/97 $480.0.0 Jeff Benken Printing Printing Dome lobby 102597 GOLF DOME . CONTR REPAIRS <* >_ SUPPLIES $480.00* FIRE DEPT_ GEN GENERAL SUPPLI GENERAL SUPPLIES 182170 11/17/97 $216.00 Jerde, Kenneth O Election services 110597 ELECTION PROF SERVICES GENERAL 11/17/97. $13.55 Jerde, Kenneth O MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 110597 ELECTION MILEAGE < *> GENERAL $229.55 *' :111797 PW-BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI GENERAL 182171. 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 182173 11/17/97 .11/17/.97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/91 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 182174 11/17/97 11/17/97 182175 11/17/97 11/17/97 182176 11/17/97 182179 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 - 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/-97 $89.40 JERRY'S FOODS . $6,.60 JERRY'S.FOODS• $110.23. JERRY'S FOODS $236.60 JERRY'S FOODS $442.83* $10.53 $121.48 $128.96 $19.00 $98.83 $8.98 $106.77" $2,031.51 $183.47. $20.07 $26.14 $1.99 $146.21 $12.15 $7.79 $2,923.88* $935.00 $297.90 $1,232.90* $319.43 $138.92 _$458.35* $236.04 $236.04* $23.05 - $85.00 - $51.90 - $25.,46 - $18.96 - $2.80- $2,629.36 - $129.33 - $17.26 - $72.55 $58.45 JERRY'S'HARDWARE JERRY'S "HARDWARE JERRY'S HARDWARE JERRY'S HARDWARE JERRY'S HARDWARE JERRY'S HARDWARE JERRY'S HARDWARE JERRY'S HARDWARE JERRY'S. HARDWARE JERRY'S HARDWARE JERRY'S HARDWARE JERRY'S HARDWARE JERRY'S HARDWARE JERRY'S-HARDWARE JERRY'S HARDWARE JERRY'S- PRINTING JERRY'S PRINTING JIM HATCH SALES JIM HATCH SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD 111797 GRILL COST OF GD SOL- GENERAL SUPPLIES 111797 ADAPTIVE RECRE GENERAL SUPPLI GENERAL SUPPLIES 1117.97 ART CENTER ADM GENERAL SUPPLI ,GENERAL SUPPLIES 111797 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI GENERAL SUPPLIES• 111797. GOLF DOME GENERAL'SUPPLI GENERAL SUPPLIES 111797. GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI GENERAL SUPPLIES 111797 FIRE DEPT_ GEN GENERAL SUPPLI GENERAL SUPPLIES 111797 PUMP.& LIFT ST GENE RAIi SUPPLI GENERAL SUPPLIES 111797 STREET NAME SI GENERAL SUPPLI GENERAL SUPPLIES 111797 POLICE DEPT.'G GENERAL SUPPLI GENERAL SUPPLIES :111797 PW-BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI GENERAL SUPPLIES 111797 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI GENERAL SUPPLIES 111797 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI GENERAL SUPPLIES . 111797 GOLF ADMINISTR GENERAL SUPPLI GENERAL SUPPLIES 111797 ENGINEERING GE GENERAL.SUPPLI GENERAL SUPPLIES 111797 VERNON OCCUPAN GENERAL SUPPLI' GENERAL SUPPLIES. 111797 STREET REVOLVI GENERAL SUPPLI GENERAL SUPPLIES 111797 POOL OPERATION GENERAL ;SUPPLI GENERAL SUPPLIES 111797 CITY HALL GENE GENERAL SUPPLI PRINTING 3057 ART CENTER ADM PRINTING 9006 PRINTING A3136 ART CENTER ADM PRINTING 9006 Shovel /handle 7975 GENERAL MAINT .GENERAL'SUPPLI 9201 Rake 8010 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 9145 Johnson Wholesale Floris TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUB 28626 ED BUILDING& -TREES FLWR SHR JOHNSON WINE CO. JOHNSON WINE CO. JOHNSON.•WINE CO. JOHNSON WINE CO.' JOHNSON.WINE CO. JOHNSON WINE CO. JOHNSON WINE CO. JOHNSON WINE CO. JOHNSON WINE CO.'. JOHNSON WINE CO. JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OFr'GOODS SOLD'WI 42208 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 42209 COST'OF GOODS SOLD WI 42878 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 42879 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 43200 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 43300, COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 768317 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI'43533 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI.43534- COST OF GOODS SOLD WI-43535 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 43536, VERNON SELLING.-CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF- GD'WINE. 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING -CST OF GD LIQU . VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE '50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 150TH ST SELLIN CST'OF GD LIQU 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD'WINE COUNCIL C..-,;K REGISTER 1i -..JV -1997 (19:10) 15 page CHECK NO ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 182179 11/17/97 - $72.55 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 43537 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/17/97 - $85.88 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 43538 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 11/17/97 - $73.54 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 43539 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 11/17/97 - $11.02 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 43684 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/17/97 $816.40 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 334170 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 11/17/97 $3,204.09 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 770748 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 11/17/97 $1,220.94 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 770749 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 11/17/97 $3,976.12 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 770750 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 11/17/97 $2,488.16 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 770751 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/17/97 $7,139.69 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 770752 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 11/17/97 $2,134.96 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 770753 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/17/97 $2,302.95 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 773789 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 11/17/97 $1,583.66 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 773790 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 11/17/97 $9,050.09 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST;OF GOODS SOLD LI 773791 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 11/17/97 $6,568.69 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 773792 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/17/97 $6,732.59 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 773793 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 11/17/97 $1,956.71 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 773794 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/17/97 $148.50 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 774036 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 11/17/97 $210.50 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 774294 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/17/97 $68.50 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 774295 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE < *> $51,504.16* 182180 11/17/97 $72.20 JOHNSON, NAOMI Art work sold 110797 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER 11/17/97 $32.16 JOHNSON, NAOMI CRAFT SUPPLIES 110797 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES 11/17/97 $17.35 JOHNSON, NAOMI GENERAL SUPPLIES 110797 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI 11/17/97 $25.00 JOHNSON, NAOMI REGISTRATION FEES 110797 ART CENTER ADM REGISTRATION F 11/17/97 $10.65 JOHNSON, NAOMI GENERAL SUPPLIES 110797 MEDIA LAB GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $157.36* 182181 11/17/97 $2,730.00 JOHNSON, RALPH Hours 110497 ASSESSING PROF SERVICES 11/17/97 $72.00 JOHNSON, RALPH Meeting 110497 ASSESSING PROF SERVICES 11/17/97 $226.80 JOHNSON, RALPH Mileage 110497 ASSESSING PROF SERVICES < *> $3,028.80* 182182 11/17/97 $100.00 JOHNSON, WALTER Police service NOV 1997 RESERVE'PROGRA PERS SERVICES < *> $100.00* 182183 11/17/97 $96.68 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY OF GOLD Battery 127797 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 9062 < *> $96.68* 182184 11/17/97 $170.00 JORDAN BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 42409 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE < *> $170.00* 182185 11/17/97 $279.62 JP FOODSERVICES INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 110197 GRILL GENERAL SUPPLI 11/17/97 $2,941.24 JP FOODSERVICES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD 110197 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 11/17/97 $517.17 JP FOODSERVICES INC CLEANING SUPPLIES 110197 GRILL CLEANING SUPPL *> $3,738.03* 182186 11/17/97 $290.50 JULIEN, DIANE Balance due 110497 EQUIPMENT OPER LIC & PERMITS < *> $290.50* 182187 11/17/97 $110.34 KARSTEN MANUFACTURING CO COST OF GOODS - PRO S 3303520 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 1160 < *> $110.34* 182188 11/17/97 $41.45 KATTLEMAN, DALE Art work sold 110797 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 12 -NOV -1997 (19:10) page 16 CHECK NO - - -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM < *> $41.45* 182189 11/17/97 $73.96 KINKO'S PRINTING 06220001 ART CENTER ADM PRINTING 11/17/97 $24.87 KINKO'S PRINTING 06220001 ART CENTER ADM PRINTING 11/17/97 $460.88 KINKO'S Printing epee 62200016 FIRE DEPT. GEN PROF SERVICES 9238 11/17/97 $52.45 KINKO'S Flyer 06220001 GOLF DOME ADVERT OTHER 9439 < *a $612.16* 182191 11/17/97 $320.80 Kiwi Kai Imports Inc COST OF-GOODS-SOLD WI 82704 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 11/17/97 $145.60 Kiwi Kai Imports Inc 'COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 82864 YORK SELLING' CST OF GD WINE 11/17/97 -$5.00 Kiwi Kai Imports Inc COST OF GOODS SOLD WI CM1024 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 11/17/97 $863.60 Kiwi Kai Imports Inc COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 82955 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/17/97 $120.20 Kiwi Kai Imports Inc COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 82956 .50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 11/17/97 $105.60 Kiwi Kai Imports Inc COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 82957' 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 11/17/97 $880.10 Kiwi Kai Imports Inc COST. OF GOODS SOLD WI 82958 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/17/97 $193.90 Kiwi Kai Imports Inc COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 83121 .50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 11/17/97 $193.90 Kiwi Kai Imports Inc COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 83123 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/17/97 .$264.45 Kiwi Kai Imports Inc COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 83128 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/17/97 $2,407.24 Kiwi Kai Imports Inc COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 83292 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/17/97 $55.90 Kiwi Kai'Imports Inc COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 83293 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 11/17/97 $485.90 Kiwi Kai Imports Inc COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 83296 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/17/97 $261.00 Kiwi Kai Imports Inc COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 83297 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 11/17/97 $120.00 Kiwi Kai Imports Inc COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 83360 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 11/17/97 $1,074.20 Kiwi Kai Imports Inc COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 83301 50TH -ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE < *> $8,087.39* 182192 11/17/97 $67.12 KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT Stakes 294106 PKBOND CIP EQUIP REPLACEM 8778 11/17/97 $22.19 KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT Stakes 294690 CLUB HOUSE- - GENERAL SUPPLI 9186 11/17/97 $225.81 KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT, Material 296089 PARKING LOTS GENERAL SUPPLI 9057 11/17/97 $22.71 KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT Misc hardware 296320 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 9059 11/17/97 $25.5 -6 KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT GENERAL SUPPLIES 297052 CITY HALL GENE'GENERAL SUPPLI 9299 11/17/97 $23.64 KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT GENERAL SUPPLIES 297103 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 9096 11/17/97 $91.50 KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT GENERAL SUPPLIES 297159 ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPLI 9122 11/17/97' $19.62 KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT GENERAL SUPPLIES 297206 BUILDINGS GENERAL SUPPLI 9099 11/17/97 $194.10 KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT LUMBER 297465 BUILDING MAINT LUMBER 9137 11/17/97 $23.62 KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT GENERAL SUPPLIES 297648 CITY HALL GENE GENERAL SUPPLI 9299 < * > $715.87* 182193 11/17/97 $255.75 KOCH, C. ROBERT Election services 110697 ELECTION PROF SERVICES 11/17/97 $48.51 KOCH,'C. ROBERT Election mileage 110697 ELECTION MILEAGE < *> $304.26* 182194 11/17/97 $1,601.06 KOJETIN, BOB Cost /materials 110397 CONTINGENCIES NEW EQUIP < *> $1,601.06* . 182195. 11/17/97 $63.05 KOMADINA, KEVIN It. Art work sold 110797 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $63.05* 182196 11/17/97 $40.95 Kovack, Orlean Art work sold 110797 ART CNTR FROG SALES OTHER < *> $40.95* 182197 11/17/97 $905.25 KREMER SPRING & ALIGNMEN REPAIR PARTS 78422 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 9377 11/17/97 $95.85 KREMER SPRING & ALIGNMEN U bolts 78556 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 9391 < *> $1,001.10* COUNCIL C_ .0 REGISTER 1; .V -1997 (19:10) page 17 CHECK NO ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 182198 11/17/97 $134.35 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 195574 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 11/17/97 $15.95 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 195575 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 11/17/97 $125.40 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 196106 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 11/17/97 $15.95 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 196106 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 11/17/97 $763.15 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 196182 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 11/17/97 $343.00 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 196631 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE r 11/17/97 $14.45 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 196653 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 11/17/97 $1,443.95 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 196755 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE < *> $2,856.20* 182199 11/17/97 $41.50 KULAK, AILEEN OFFICE SUPPLIES 102997 GOLF ADMINISTR OFFICE SUPPLIE < *> $41.50* 182200 11/17/97 $116.00 LAKE RESTORATION INC Boat rental 2064 PONDS & LAKES EQUIP RENTAL 9319 < *> $116.00* 182201 11/17/97 $31.98 Lathrop Paint Supply Com Guard /screw 720757 PAVEMENT MARKI GENERAL SUPPLI 9040 < *> $31.98* 182202 11/17/97 $47.60 LAWRENCE, JEANNE Craft supplies 110897 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES < *> $47.60* 182203 11/17/97 $253.74 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. Hardware 1779285 ST LIGHTING OR GENERAL SUPPLI 9070 11/17/97 $293.12 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. Hardware 1779286 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 9071 11/17/97 $329.59 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. Marking paint 1779287 DISTRIBUTION PAINT 9068 11/17/97 $150.17 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. Hardware 1781543 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 9070 11/17/97 $178.87 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. Hardware 1784651 STREET NAME SI GENERAL SUPPLI 9168 11/17/97 $447.79 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. Misc hardware 1788374 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 9169 11/17/97 $367.72 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. Ty -rap 1789986 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 9042 11/17/97 $89.50 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. Bolt /hook 1789987 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 9042 11/17/97 $127.54 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. Stripe paint 1792995 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 9084 11/17/97 $335.56 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. Hardware 1794714 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 9085 11/17/97 $125.30 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. Screws & washers 1798203 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLI 9159 11/17/97 $77.19 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. Misc shop supplies 1799187 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 9160 < *> $2,776.09* 182204 11/17/97 $48.68 LEE, MARGE E Art work sold 110797 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $48.68* 182205 11/17/97 $30.41 LEEF BROS. INC. LAUNDRY 103197/G MAINT OF COURS LAUNDRY < *> $30.41* 182206 11/17/97 $71.76 LEHMANN FARMS COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 71374 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $71.76* 182207 11/17/97 $2,318.12 LEITNER COMPANY SOD & BLACK DIRT 103197 MAINT OF COURS SOD '& DIRT < *> $2,318.12* 182208 11/17/97 $25.83 LINHOFF ADVERTISING OTHER 0037943 ART CENTER ADM ADVERT OTHER 9321 < *> $25.83* 182209 11/17/97 $127.45 LITIN PAPER CO GENERAL SUPPLIES 79508 ART SUPPLY GIF GENERAL SUPPLI 9322 < *> $127.45* 182210 11/17/97 $28.60 Lone Egret Press Art work sold 13.0797 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 12 -NUV -1997 (19:10) page 18 CHECK NO DATE. ------------------------ CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM < > $28.60* ---------------------- - - - - -- -- ----- - - - - --- - - - -- 182211 11/17/97 $319.79 LUTZ, R. MICHAEL UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 110397 POLICE DEPT. G UNIF ALLOW < *> $319.79* 182212 * 11/17/97 $57.00 Lynn Peavey Company GENERAL SUPPLIES 141245 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI 9212 < >' $57.00* 182213 11/17/97 $18.00 M. SHANKEN COMMUNICATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 092997 VERNON SE LLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $18.00* 182214 11/17/97 11/17/97 $477.02 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. Broom 29710160 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 9195 $34.64 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. Filter 29710221 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $511.66* 182215 11/17/97 11/17/97 - $117.79 Mail Boxes Etc Colored printing 7806 STRECY- HILLDAL CIP 9500 < *> $86.64 $204.43* Mail Boxes Etc Colored printing 7806 ENGINEERING GE BLUE PRINTING 9506 182216 11/17/97 $16.00 MAMA Mtg exp. 611 ADMINISTRATION MEETING EXPENS < *> $16.00* _ 182217 11/17/97 $1,310.00 MARGROM SKOGLUND WINE IM COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 3632 VERNON SELLING OF CD WINE < *> $1,310.00* .CST 182220 11/17/97 $972.50 MARK VII SALES COST OF =GOODS SOLD BE 702459 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 11/17/97 11/17/97 $41.60 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 702460 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 11/17/97 $341.38 $13.25 MARK MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 702756 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 11/17/97 $218.95 MARK VII VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 702757- 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 11/17/97 $7.40 MARK VII SALES SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 702759 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 11/17/91 $2,296.20 MARK VII SALES COST COST OF OF GOODS GOODS SOLD SOLD BE BE 702760 702778 VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING CST-OF GDS BEE 11/17/97 $91.25 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 702779 YORK SELLING CST CST OF OF GDS GDS BEE BEE 11/17/97 11/17/97 $216.00 $334.80 MARK.VII MARK SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 702785 - 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 11/17/97 $323.00_ MARK VII VII SALES SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 703250 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 11/17/97 $1,220.45 MARK VII SALES COST COST.OF OF GOODS GOODS SOLD SOLD BE BE 103197/G 704833 GRILL 50TH ST CST OF GDS BEE 11/17/97 $471.90. MARK VII SALES 'COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 704851 SELLIN YORK SELLING CST CST OF OF GDS GDS BEE BEE - 11/17/97 11/17/97 $52.75 -6.80 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 704852 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 11/17/97 $3 $1,346.-25 MARK MARK VII VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 704853 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 11/17/97 $91.70 MARK VII SALES - COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 704858 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 11/17/97 $34.45 MARK SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 7048.59 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 11/17/97 $598.35 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 704860 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 11/17/97, $1,391.30 MARK VII VII SALES SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 705110 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 11/17/97 $3,066.25 MARK VII SALES COST COST OF OF GOODS GOODS SOLD SOLD BE BE 705111 705114. VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 11/17/97 $91.50 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 905115 YORK SELLING YORK SELLING ' CST CST OF OF GDS GDS BEE BEE 11/17/97 11/17/97 $306.00 $181.50 MARK MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 705599 50TH ST SELLIN CST .OF GDS BEE 11/17/97 $1,254.15 MARK VII VII SALES SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 705600 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 11/17/97 - $12.80. MARK VII'SALES COST COST OF OF GOODS GOODS SOLD SOLD BE MI 707133 50TH ST-SELLIN CST OF GDS-BEE 11/17/97 $7.40 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 707134 707.135 50TH ST SELLIN 50TH ST SELLIN CST CST OF OF GDS GDS MIX MIX 11/17/97 $907.30 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 707158 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 11/17/97 11/17/97 $75.70 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MI. 707159 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX $2,162.25 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 707165, VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE COUNCIL Ca. -A REGISTER 12 -...)V -1997 (19:10) page 19 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 182220 11/17/97 $12.80 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 707166 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE < *> $18,177.93* 182221 11/17/97 182222. 11/17/97 182223 11/17/97 182224 11/17/97 11/17/97 182225 11/17/97 182226 11/17/97 182227 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 182228 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 182229 11/17/97 182230 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 $90.63 $90.63* $115.00 $115.00* $30.00 $30.00* MATHISON CO, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD 949520 ART SUPPLY GIF COST OF GD SOL 9010 Matrix Communications In Assess analog line 29717 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE MAUMA $312.93 MCNEILUS STEEL $364.22 MCNEILUS STEEL $677.15* Dues Steel /stock Steel for new rink $375.00 MEDICINE SHOW MUSIC CO Service Edinborough $375.00* $414.00 Medtox Fee for service $414.00* $39.37 $71.18 $375.40 $485.95* $83.67 $43.73 $72.45 $16.62 $226.42 $208.47 $49.05 $49.66 $50.24 $800.31* $100.00 $100.00* $430.41 $44.37 $477.65 $523.92 $399.37 $533.03 $998.43 $990.76 $493.62 $494.54 $672.01 $6,058.11* MENARDS ACCT #35170288 Lights /betteries MENARDS ACCT #35170288 Tape MENARDS ACCT #35170288 REPAIR PARTS MENARDS * ACCT #30240251 Repair MENARDS * ACCT #30240251 REPAIR PARTS MENARDS * ACCT #30240251 Dome MENARDS * ACCT #30240251 Repair MENARDS * ACCT #30240251 Dome MENARDS * ACCT 930240251 Repair MENARDS * ACCT #30240251 Tarp & supplies MENARDS * ACCT #30240251 Repair parts MENARDS * ACCT #30240251 Tarps MERFELD, BURT MERIT SUPPLY MERIT SUPPLY MERIT SUPPLY MERIT SUPPLY MERIT SUPPLY MERIT SUPPLY MERIT SUPPLY MERIT SUPPLY MERIT SUPPLY MERIT SUPPLY MERIT SUPPLY Police service 110197 ADMINISTRATION DUES & SUBSCRI 182240 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 9194 161052 PKBOND CIP EQUIP REPLACEM 8176 111797 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER 10977911 CENT SVC GENER ADVERT PERSONL 20114 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 9449 20016 ED BUILDING & GENERAL.SUPPLI 9032 20269 GOLF DOME REPAIR PARTS 9267 24827 GOLF DOME REPAIR PARTS 9227 24875 GOLF DOME REPAIR PARTS 9260 24881 GOLF DOME REPAIR PARTS 9229 24932 GOLF DOME REPAIR PARTS 9440 052146 GOLF DOME REPAIR PARTS 9262 053215 GOLF DOME REPAIR PARTS 24948 GOLF DOME REPAIR PARTS 9262 24978 GOLF DOME REPAIR PARTS 9444 25024 GOLF DOME REPAIR PARTS 9265 NOV 1997 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES CLEANING SUPPLIES 46471 Repair parts for ecru 46480 CLEANING SUPPLIES 46542 CLEANING SUPPLIES 46558 Polyliners 46557 Wash & wax 46575 CLEANING SUPPLIES 46586 CLEANING SUPPLIES 46608 Cleaning supplies 46611 CLEANING SUPPLIES 46624 CLEANING SUPPLIES 46632 PW BUILDING CLEANING SUPPL 9048 BUILDING MAINT REPAIR PARTS 9064 ARENA BLDG /GRO CLEANING SUPPL 9251 ED BUILDING & CLEANING SUPPL 9030 STREET REVOLVI GENERAL SUPPLI 9165 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 9176 ARENA BLDG /GRO CLEANING SUPPL 9398 ARENA BLDG /GRO CLEANING SUPPL 9453 LITTER REMOVAL GENERAL SUPPLI 9308 ED BUILDING & CLEANING SUPPL 9405 ARENA BLDG /GRO CLEANING SUPPL 9507 182231 11/17/97 $15.00 MESSERLI & KRAMER Collect fees 102297 GENERAL FD PRO AMBULANCE FEES COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 12 -14UV -1997 -(19:10) page 20. CHECK NO -------------------------------------------- DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR ------------------------------------------------- DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 182231 11/17/97 $5.19 MESSERLI & KRAMER. Collect fees 58127 - ----- --------------------- GENERAL FD PRO AMBULANCE FEES =------------ < *> $20.19* 182232 11/17/97 $5,410.52 .METRO SALES INC Copier 558531 GOLF PROG OFFICE FURN & 5347 11/17/97 $780.05 METRO SALES INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 558532 -GOLF ADMINISTR.OFFICE SUPPLIE < *> $6,190.57* 182233 11/17/97 .$80.00 Metro Volley Ball Offici Officiating fees. 110497 EDINA ATHLETIC PROF SERVICES . < *> $80.00* 182234 11/17/97_ $18.13 Metropolitan Ford of Ede Handle 308048 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 9395 < *> $18.13* 182235 11/17/97 -$41,770.61', MIDWEST ASPHALT CORPORAT CONSTR. IN'PROGRESS. 97 -1 #6 STREET IMPROVE CIP < *> _ ".$41,770.61* 182236 11/17/97 $485.42 MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPLY PAPER SUPPLIES 15612 CITY HALL GENE PAPER SUPPLIES 9276 < *> $485.4'2* 182237 11/17/97 $74.55 MIDWEST -COCA -COLA BOTTLI COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 11332219 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 11/17/97 $194.40 MIDWEST COCA- COLA'BOTTLI COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 63901142 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS•MIX 11/17/97 $132.95, MIDWEST COCA - COLA BOTTLI COST-OF GOODS SOLD MI 62102122 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 11/17/97 $157.10 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI:COST OF GOODS SOLD MI,62102171 VERNON SELLING'CST OF GDS MIX 11/17/97. $63.25 MIDWEST COCA- COLA`BOTTLI COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 63904062 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $622.25* 182238 11/17/97 $5,725.00 `MIDWEST WINDOWS & SIDING New windows 110397 CDBG PROG PROF SERVICES < *> $5,725.00* 182239 '11/17/97 $68.43 MIDWEST WIRE &,STEEL Deer feed 119707 DEER CONTROL GENERAL SUPPLI 9086 < *> $68.43* 182240 11/17/97 $1,865.60 Mike Vangen'Installers Carpet installed 110797 GOLF DOME CONTR REPAIRS < *> $1,865.60* 182241. 11/17/97 $230..75 Mill City Printworks Art work sold 110797 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER $230.75* 182242 11/17/97 $1,366.50 MINNEAPOLIS.& SUBURBAN S Repalce water service 31 DISTRIBUTION CONTR REPAIRS 9133 11/17/97 $585.00 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN•S'Cert service line -173 31182• . DISTRIBUTION CONTR REPAIRS -9318 11/17/97 $687.00 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN S Replace sewer lines 31184 DISTRIBUTION CONTR REPAIRS 9331 11/17/97 $999.00 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN S Replace sewer lines 31185 DISTRIBUTION CONTR REPAIRS 9330 < *> $3,637.50* 182244 11/17/97 $191.64 MINNEGASCO HEAT .111797 FIRE DEPT. GEN-HEAT 11/17/97 $159.20 MINNEGASCO HEAT 111797 CITY HALL.GENE_HEAT 11/17/97 $659.11 MINNEGASCO HEAT 1,11797. PW BUILDING HEAT 11/17/97 $309.47 MINNEGASCO HEAT 111797 BUILDING MAINT HEAT 11/17/97 .$160.08 MINNEGASCO HEAT 111797 ART CENTER BLD HEAT 11/17/97 $39.99 MINNEGASCO HEAT 111797 CLUB HOUSE HEAT - 11/17/97 $38.60 MINNEGASCO HEAT 111797 MAINT OF -LOURS HEAT 11/17/97 - $933.28 MINNEGASCO HEAT 111797 GOLF. DOME HEAT 11/17/97 $16.59 MINNEGASCO HEAT 111797 FRED RICHARDS HEAT 11/1,7/97 $2,389.25 MINNEGASCO HEAT 111797 ARENA BLDG /GRO HEAT 11/17/97 $402.78 MINNEGASCO HEAT 111797 ED BUILDING & HEAT COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 12 -NOV -1997 (19:10) page 21 CHECK NO ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 182244 11/17/97 $234.87 MINNEGASCO HEAT 111797 PUMP & LIFT ST HEAT 11/17/97 $1,544.86 MINNEGASCO HEAT 111797 DISTRIBUTION HEAT 11/17/97 $10.42 MINNEGASCO HEAT 111797 50TH ST OCCUPA HEAT 11/17/97 $29.39 MINNEGASCO HEAT 111797 YORK OCCUPANCY HEAT 11/17/97 $24.75 MINNEGASCO HEAT 111797 VERNON OCCUPAN HEAT < *> $5,277.72* 182245 11/17/97 $120.00 MINNESOTA ASPHALT PAVEME CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 110697 ENGINEERING GE CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $120.00* 182246 11/17/97 $14.46 MINNESOTA WANNER Sprayer repair parts 34950 FIELD MAINTENA REPAIR PARTS 9090 < *> $14.46* 182247 11/17/97 $503.65 Mitchell /Repair Informat Mitchell H.D. trucks 092997 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS < *> $503.65* 182248 11/17/97 $75.00 MN Monthly Publications MN Monthly ad TC83 50TH ST SELLIN ADVERT OTHER 11/17/97 $25.00 MN Monthly Publications MN Monthly ad TC83 YORK SELLING ADVERT OTHER 11/17/97 $25.00 MN Monthly Publications MN monthly ad TC83 VERNON SELLING ADVERT OTHER < *> $125.00* 182249 11/17/97 $371.68 MOBILE CELLULAR UNLIMITE Radio 392 102497 FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP REPLACEM 9233 < *> $371.68* 182250 11/17/97 $140.00 MPGMA Registration 102797 GOLF ADMINISTR CON? & SCHOOLS < *> $140.00* 182251 11/17/97 $190.00 MTGF Conference Conference 103097 ED ADMINISTRAT CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $190.00* 182252 11/17/97 $322.86 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO Irrigation supplies I193454 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 9126 11/17/97 $179.35 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO Irrigation parts 195073 MAINT OF COURS IRRIGATION EQU 9263 11/17/97 $56.27 MTI DISTRIBUTING,CO Repair parts I195338 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 9594 < *> $558.48* 182253 11/17/97 $52.00 N.A.D.A. Car guide 1197 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $52.00* 182254 11/17/97 $31.50 Napa Auto Parts Parts 9894 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 9293 < *> $31.50* 182255 11/17/97 $58.85 National Fire Protection Refer mat elec 55974 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 9147 < *> $58.85* 182256 11/17/97 $87.00 NATIONAL UNDERWRITERS CO Subscription 110197 ADMINISTRATION DUES & SUBSCRI < *> $87.00* 182257 11/17/97 $244.95 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGN Signs for Police Dept 2075584 STREET NAME SI SIGNS & POSTS 8886 < *> $244.95* 182258 11/17/97 $100.00 NISSEN, DICK Police service NOV 1997 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES < *> $100.00* 182259 11/17/97 $44.00 NORTH STAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 74759 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 11/17/97 $36.00 NORTH STAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 74760 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 12 -NUV -1997 (19:10) page 22 CHECK NO DATE' ---------------------_--------: CHECK AMOUNT -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 182259 11/17/97 $64.50 NORTH STAR ICE. COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 75584 - - 50TH ST SELLIN - - CST OF GDS MIX ------------ 11/17/97 $62.00 NORTH STAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 75587 YORK.SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $206.50* 182260 11/17/97 $348.40 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY COST OF GOODS SOLD 258823 ART SUPPLY GIF COST OF GD SOL 9003 11/17/97 $39.60 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY COST OF GOODS SOLD 259008 ART SUPPLY GIP COST OF GD SOL 9009 < * >. $388.00* 182261 11/17/97 $233.60 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO Tires NW41527 SUPERV. & OVRH HAZ. WASTE DIS 9146 11/17/97 11/17/97 $68.64 $383.88 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO NORTHWESTERN TIRES &TUBES NW41528 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES 9146 11/17/97 $296.03 TIRE CO NORTHWESTERN TIRE Tires Tire NW41645 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES < *> $982.15* -CO NW41932 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES 9146 182262 11/17/97 $75.00 NOTEABLE SINGERS Service Edinborough 110697 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $75.00* 182264 11/17/97 11/17/97 $3.14 NSP LIGHT& POWER, 111797 GENERAL MAINT LIGHT & POWER. $224.75 NSP LIGHT & POWER 111797 ST LIGHTING OR LIGHT & POWER 11/17/97 $1,886.90. NSP LIGHT & POWER 111797 TRAFFIC SIGNAL LIGHT POWER 11/17/97 $462.76 NSP LIGHT & POWER 111797 GENERAL STORM _& LIGHT & POWER 11/17/97 $75.50 NSP LIGHT & POWER 111797 PONDS & LAKES LIGHT & POWER 11/17/97 $3,157.42 NSP LIGHT & POWER 111797 PARKING RAMP LIGHT & POWER 11/17/97 11/17/97 $15.70 $999.46 NSP NSP LIGHT& POWER 111797 CIVIL DEFENSE LIGHT & POWER 11/17/97 $639.87 NSP LIGHT & POWER 111797 PW BUILDING LIGHT & POWER 11/17/97 $6,372.87 NSP LIGHT & LIGHT & POWER POWER 111797 111797 ART CENTER BLD BUILDING MAINT LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER 11/17/97 11/17/97 $35.23 $11,351.73 NSP NSP LIGHT & POWER 111797 POOL OPERATION LIGHT & POWER 11/17/97 $2,056.23 NSP LIGHT & LIGHT & POWER POWER 111797 ARENA BLDG /GRO LIGHT & POWER 11/17/97 $7,789.31 NSP LIGHT & POWER 111797 111797 PUMP & LIFT ST DISTRIBUTION LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER 11/17/97 $28.63 NSP LIGHT & POWER 111797 TANKS TOWERS & LIGHT & POWER 11/17/97 $712.82 NSP LIGHT & POWER 111797 50TH ST OCCUPA LIGHT & POWER 11/17/97 11/17/97 $24:41 $168.04 NSP NSP PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 111797 AQUATIC WEEDS; PROF SERVICES LIGHT & POWER 111797 GOLF DOME LIGHT & POWER < *> $36,004.77* 182265 11/17/97 $42.00 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC COST OF GOODS SOLD 8954332 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 3967 < *> $42.00* 182266 11/17/97 $306.37 OWENS SERVICE CO Boiler check 16511 ED BUILDING & CONTR REPAIRS 9403 < *> $306.37* 182267 11/17/97 $25.00 PACER ADVERTISING OTHER 110897 ART. CENTER ADM ADVERT OTHER < *> $25.00* 182268 11/17/97 $377.41 PAGING NETWORK OF MINNES EQUIPMENT RENTAL 110197 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP RENTAL < *> $377.41* 182269 11/17/97 $45.50 PANCAKE, CHAR Art work sold 110797 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $45.50* 182270 11/17/97 $11.60 PARK NICOLLET MEDICAL CE Flu shot 101897 POLICE DEPT. G PROF SERVICES 11/17/97 $219.00 PARK NICOLLET MEDICAL CE Return to work exam 101897 FIRE DEPT. GEN PHYS EXAMS 11/17/97 $100.00 PARK NICOLLET MEDICAL CE Pre emply.phyical 101897 CENT SVC GENER . ADVERT PERSONL COUNCIL L. -_.:K REGISTER 1k "OV -1997 (19:10) page 23 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------- $--- :---------- - - - - -- -------------------- ------------------------------- ---------------------------- < *> $330.60* - -- 182271 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 182272 11/17/97 < *> 182273 11/17/97 182274 11/17/97 182276 182279 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 $172.30 $68.05 $12.10 $390.33 $27.50 $670.28* PEPSI -COLA COMPANY PEPSI -COLA COMPANY PEPSI -COLA COMPANY PEPSI -COLA COMPANY PEPSI -COLA COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 40531393 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 43852081 COST OF GOODS SOLD 110297 COST OF GOODS SOLD 110297 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 43852138 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX FRED RICHARDS COST OF GD SOL GRILL COST OF'GD SOL 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX $1,755.00 PERFORMANCE DRIVING INC CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 2109 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS $1,755.00* $475.00 PERKINS LANDSCAPE CONTRA Grading walnut ridge 110497 PKBOND CIP EQUIP REPLACEM 9558 $475.00* $187.50 Peterson, Ralph III Pro plan review evc 102997 INSPECTIONS PROF SERVICES $187.50* $17.65 $4.75 $1.56 $7.25 $51.64 $3.18 $11.68 $15.00 $6.33 $8.13 $12.00 $7.66 $21.24 $17.63 $15.36 $1.02 $202.08* -$5.95 -$5.95 - $77.58 $444.00 $1,250.50 -$7.50 - $42.20 -$5.50 - $13.78 - $11.42 $1,268.95 $729.60 $970.85 $931.15 $1,023.25 $1,986.88 $327.71 $1,152.24 $29.55 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS MEETING EXPENSE 111097 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 111097 POSTAGE 111097 MEETING EXPENSE 111097 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 111097 GENERAL SUPPLIES 111097 GENERAL SUPPLIES 111097 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 111097 GENERAL SUPPLIES 111097 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 111097 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 111097 GENERAL SUPPLIES 111097 GENERAL SUPPLIES 111097 GENERAL SUPPLIES 111097 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 111097 Over /under 111097 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI'23940. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 23941 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 24418 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 332244 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 332245 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 24527 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 24609 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 24610 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 24611 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 24612 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 333124 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 333125 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 333126 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 333631 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 333632 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 333633 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 334169 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 334171 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 334352 ADMINISTRATION MEETING EXPENS ADMINISTRATION MILEAGE ADMINISTRATION POSTAGE ASSESSING MEETING EXPENS ASSESSING MILEAGE ASSESSING GENERAL SUPPLI ENGINEERING GE GENERAL SUPPLI PUBLIC HEALTH CONF & SCHOOLS PUBLIC HEALTH GENERAL SUPPLI PUBLIC HEALTH PHOTO SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS CONF & SCHOOLS DEER CONTROL GENERAL SUPPLI CENT SVC GENER GENERAL.SUPPLI PARK ADMIN. GENERAL SUPPLI RECYCLING CONF & SCHOOLS GENERAL FD PRO CASH OVER AND 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU SOTH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER $59.64 < *> 12 -NUV -1997 (19:10) 182283 11/17/97 $35.36 < *> $35.36* 182284 11/17/97 $5,000-.00 - < *> $5,000.00* 182285 11/17/97 $691.36 11/17/97 $920.68 11/17/97 $543.15 page 24 CHECK NO --------- DATE ------- -- ---- CHECK AMOUNT ------- ---- - - ---- - - -_- VENDOR _-- --- - - - --- 182286 DESCRIPTION $153.00 INVOICE PROGRAM $153.00* OBJECT PO NUM 182279 11/17/97 $1,408.00 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS - -__-- COST ---------------------------------------------------------- OF GOODS SOLD WI 334568 SOT ST:SELLIN OF.GD WINS 11/17/97 $5,325.00 - PHILLIPS - WINE& SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 334569 YORK SELLING -CST CST OF GD WINE 11/17/97 $258:00 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OFGOODS SOLD'WI 334648 50TH ST SELLIN ".CST OF GD WINE 11/17/97 :$3,029.50 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 335533 50TH ST SELLIN CST GD WINE 11/17/97 $998.60 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST,OF GOODS SOLD WI 335534 YORK SELLING -OF CST OF GD WINE 11/17/97 $2,229.60 PHILLIPS WINE'& SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 335535 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/17/97 $68.4,0 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS.SOLD MI 335710 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 11/17/97 $332.28 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 335711 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 11/17/97 $918.95 PHILLIPS WINE &_SPIRITS COST.OF GOODS SOLD,WI 335712 50TH ST-SELLIN CST OF GD 11/17/97 $1,798.70 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS, COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 335713 YORK SELLING CST OF GD -.WINE LIQU. 1.1/17/97 $3,197.81 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 335714 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/17/97 $712.81 PHILLIPS WINE &.SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI- 335715 VERNON SELLING CST.OF GD LI.QU 11/17/97 $1,279.43 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS.SOLD WI 335716 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE. 11/17/97 $262.50 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 335717 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS < *> $31,764.38* -BEE 182280 11/17/97 $349.60 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD.MI 967992 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 11/17/97 .$294.40 -- PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 968013 VERNON SELLING -CST OF GDS MIX 11/17/97 $460.00 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD.MI 968163 - VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 11/17/97 $257.60 -.PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI'96814'2 50TH ST SELLIN CST, OF GDS MIX 11/17/97 $81,.75 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 968211 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 11/17/97 $171.05 .PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS -SOLD MI 968212 .YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 11/17/97 $35:75 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 968213 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 11/17/97 $920.00 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 968270 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 11/17/97 $294.40 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 968299 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 11/17/97 $294.40 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 968319 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $3,158.95* 182281 11/17/97 $10,958.31 PIPE SERVICES CORP TV sanitary sewer 970073, DISTRIBUTION PROF SERVICES 8679 < *> $10,958.31 *, 182282 -11/17/97 $59.64 < *> EQUIP RENTAL, $59.64* 182283 11/17/97 $35.36 < *> $35.36* 182284 11/17/97 $5,000-.00 - < *> $5,000.00* 182285 11/17/97 $691.36 11/17/97 $920.68 11/17/97 $543.15 11/17/97 $543.15. < *> $2,'698.34* 182286 11/17/97 $153.00 < *> $153.00* 182287 11/17/97 $853.07 < *> $853.07* 18228'8 11/17/97 $44.13 < *> $44.13* PLASTIC TO GO WAREHOUSE Materials /council roo 015601 PLUNKETTS ;GENERAL SUPPLIES 653902 POSTMASTER Postage permit #939 110597 PRAIRIE EQUIPMENT COMPAN Pump repair parts PRAIRIE EQUIPMENT'COMPAN Pump repair parts PRAIRIE,EQUIPMENT COMPAN Pipe rental PRAIRIE EQUIPMENT - COMPAN Pipe rental PRECISION BUSINESS SYSTE GENERAL SUPPLIES Precision Tree Company, Stump removal Prentice Hall Inc Book CITY HALL GENE GENERAL SUPPLI 9504 ARENA.BLDG /GRO•GENERAL SUPPLI CENT SVC GENER POSTAGE 1055 PONDS & LAKES 1056 PONDS & LAKES 1061.. PONDS & LAKES 1062 PONDS'& LAKES REPAIR PARTS 8726 REPAIR PARTS 8927' EQUIP RENTAL, .8499 EQUIP RENTAL 8499 060022 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI 9451 102197 TREES &.MAINTE PLANT &:TREES _9050 24008366 INSPECTIONS BOOKS & PAMPHL COUNCIL C.. ,.0 REGISTER ' 1; .V -1997 (19:10) page 25 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM --------------------- ----------------------------------------------- -- ------ - - - - -- ------------------------ ' ------------------- - - -- -- 182289 11/17/97 $220.00 PRIMA Dues 0454. ADMINISTRATION DUES & SUBSCRI < *> $220.00* 182290 11/17/97 182291. 11/17/97 < *> ' 182294 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 11/17/97 182295 11/17/97 182296 11/17/97 182297 11/17/97 182298 11/17/97 $635.27 PRINT SHOP, THE $635.27* $15.50 PRINTERS SERVICE INC $15.50* $515.50 - $22.34 $780.80 $287.70 -$9.27 $13.32 $60.34 $45.43 $1,122.22 $34.20 $25.74 $692.59 $32.45 $29.03 $60.34 $45.43 $1,084.50 $44.30 $156.12 $102.45 $668.19 $351.80 $1,071.57 $152.10 $195.13 $1,846.09 $9,359.09* PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY $110.50 PRO GUARD $110.50* $205.00 QUALITY WASTE $205.00* GENERAL SUPPLIES 30806 Blade sharpening 13895 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 24706 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 73853 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 27912 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 27918 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 74103 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 74104 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 29559 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 29560 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 29561 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 29563 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 29564 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 29566 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 29567 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 29570 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 29571 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 29572 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 29574 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 29575 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 29576 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 31243 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 31246 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 31253 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 31255 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 31256 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 31263 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 31264 GENERAL SUPPLIES 138868 Swim club 111497 $59.80 RASMUSSEN, JANAAN SKIBBE Art work sold $59.80* $107.34 Rental Center & Power To Building supplies $107.34* SENIOR CITIZEN GENERAL SUPPLI 9206 ARENA ICE MAIN EQUIP MAINT YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPLI 9478 POOL OPERATION RUBBISH REMOVA 110797 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER 83760 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 6738 182299 11/17/97 $21.74 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED Bar /hitch 179801 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 9047 11/17/97 $56.06 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED Hitch 184526 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 9167 < *> $77.80* 182300 11/17/97 $10.64 Ritz Camera Film processing 3745211 STRECY - HILLDAL CIP 9448 < *> $10.64* COUNCIL CHEC& REGISTER 12 -NuV -1997 (19:10) page 26 CHECK NO DATE ----------------- --------------------------------:---------------------_--------------------=------------------------------------ CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM, OBJECT PO NUM 182301 11/17/97 $257.10 RLWW Company L P The COST OF GOODS PRO S 72022334 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 1156 < *> $257.10* 182302 11/17/97 $45.68 ROSLAND, KENNETH MEETING EXPENSE 111797 ADMINISTRATION MEETING EXPENS < *> $45.68* 1823b3' 11/17/97 $585.75 RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON EQ.CO .Rental roller E00236 PARKING LOTS GENERAL SUPPLI 9264 < *> $585.75* 162304 11/-17/97 $193.83 SAFETY KLEEN Haz waste 584404 SUPERV. & OVRH HAZ. WASTE DIS < *> $193.83* 182305 11/17/97 .$100.00 SCHATTAUER, JIM Services Edinborough 112097 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $100.00* 182306 11/17/97 $136.46 Scratch -Art Company Inc COST OF GOODS SOLD 8310 ART SUPPLY GIF COST-OF GD SOL 9293 < *> $136..46* 182307 11/17/97 $53.25 SENRICK, LAURA UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 110397 POLICE DEPT. G UNIF ALLOW < *> $53.25* 182308 11/17/97 $100.00 SHEPARD, JOHN Police service NOV 1997 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES < *> $100.00* 182309 11/17/97 $112.00 Sheridan, Melissa Class refund 102897 ART CNTR PROG REGISTRATION F < *> $112.00* 182310 11/17/97 $177.09 SHERWIN WILLIAMS Paint supplies 65747 PAVEMENT MARKI GENERAL SUPPLI 9051 11/17/97 $300.84 SHERWIN WILLIAMS Paint spray 69715 STREET NAME SI SIGNS & POSTS 9138 < *> $477.93* 182311 11/17/97 $75.93 SIMS SECURITY Guard 8230305 ED BUILDING,& PROF SERVICES 11/17/97 $174.65 SIMS SECURITY Guard 8244336 ED'BUILDING & PROF SERVICES < *> $250.58* 182312 11/17/97 $18.85_ Sisinni Food Service Meeting 165911 I -494 COMMISSI MEETING EXPENS_ 11/17/97 $22.50. Sisinni Food Service I494 Com Misc 102597 I -,494 COMMISSI MEETING EXPENS < *> $41.35* 182313 11/17/97 ,$645.00 SKB ENVIRONMENTAL Rink debris disposal 13515 BUILDING-MAINT RUBBISH REMOVA < *> $645.00* 182314 11/17/97 $93.00 SOCCER EXPRESS Uniform shirts 1750 FIRE DEPT. GEN UNIF ALLOW 7935 < *> $93.00* 182315 11/17/97 $1,462.10 - SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 77682 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 11/17/97 $1,194.85 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 77684 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 11/17/97 $3,277.70 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 77902 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 11/17/97 $23.50 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD MI -77903 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 11/17/97 $1,187.90 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF -GOODS SOLD BE 77905 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 11/17/97 $255.00 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST -OF GOODS SOLD BE 54644 YORK SELLING CST -OF GDS BEE < *> $7,401.05* 182316 11/17/97 $20.75 Sportsware Technologies Rules of golf /video 102897 GOLF ADMINISTR GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $20.75* COUNCIL :K REGISTER 1_ JV -1997 (19:10) page 27 CHECK NO DATE - ------ ---------- ------------: CHECK AMOUNT ---------------------------------------------------------- VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 182317 < *> 11/17/97 $40.00 $40.00* - ST. ANTHONY CIVIC ORCHES Services Edinborou g -- h --- 110997 - ----------- ED ADMINISTRAT - - PRO SVC OTHER ------------- 182318 < *> 11/17/97 $60.00 $60.00* Stallion Electric GENERAL SUPPLIES 3008 ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPLI 9501 182319. 11/17/97 11/17/97 $203.10 $203.10 STAR TRIBUNE STAR Advertising 101397 FRED RICHARDS PROF SERVICES 11/17/97 $2,036.15 TRIBUNE STAR TRIBUNE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Help wanted ads 101397 103197 RANGE PROF SERVICES < *> $2,442.35* CENT SVC GENER ADVERT PERSONL 182320 < *> 11/17/97 $13,278.32 $13,278.32* STORAGE EQUIPMENT INC Lockes 63879 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 7005 182321 11/17/97 11/17/97 $118.39 $728.75 STREICHERS STREICHERS AMMUNITION 577901 POLICE DEPT. G AMMUNITION 9230 11/17/97 $742.90 STREICHERS AMMUNITION AMMUNITION 532321 540852 POLICE DEPT. G POLICE DEPT. AMMUNITION 9458 11/17/97 11/17/97 $127.75 $60.91 STREICHERS STREICHERS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 961982 G RESERVE PROGRA AMMUNITION EQUIP REPLACEM 9456 8563 11/17/97 $287.39 STREICHERS AMMUNITION SAFETY EQUIPMENT 657781 991132 POLICE DEPT. G POLICE AMMUNITION 9457 < *> $2,066.09* DEPT. G SAFETY EQUIPME 9272 182322 < *> 11/17/97 $100.00 $100.00* Strohmyer, Tom Contract sery Edinbor 111197 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER 182323 11/17/97 11/17/97 $1,156.31 $78.14 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SUBURBAN CHEVROLET Repairs Handle 308325 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 8940 11/17/97 $18,895.00 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET P/U truck 92715 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 9380 11/17/97 $1,853.71 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET Body repair 973215 310671 EQUIPMENT REPL EQUIPMENT OPER EQUIP REPLACEM 9365 11/17/97 11/17/97 $23.54 $16.54 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET SUBURBAN Wire ignition 94171 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS GENERAL SUPPLI 9400 9155 < *> $22,023.24* CHEVROLET Mate 94362 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 9169 182324 < *> 11/17/97 $233.66 $233.66* SUBURBAN PROPANE LP Fuel 101797 ARENA ICE MAIN GASOLINE 182325 < *> 11/17/97 $50.05 SUNDIN, ROSALIE Art work sold 110797 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER $50.05* 182326 11/17/97 11/17/97 $127.92 $144.00 SUPERAMERICA SUPERAMERICA Propane 101497 EQUIPMENT OPER GASOLINE 11/17/97 $137.31 SUPERAMERICA Propane MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 101597 102197 STREET RENOVAT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $409.23* G MILEAGE 182327 < *> 11/17/97 $3,667.50 $3,667.50* Superior Special Service Construction 97 -4 #2 PKBOND CIP EQUIP REPLACEM 182328 < *> 11/17/97 $100.00 $100.00* SWANSON, HAROLD Police service NOV 1997 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES 182329 < *> 11/17/97 $150.00 $150.00* TAIKO, KOGEN Servicee Ed.inborough 1t2397 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER 182330 *> 11/17/97 $64.97 Tape Distributors of Min General supplies 81322 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI < $64.97* 9278 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 12 -NUV -1997 (19:10) page 28 CHECK NO ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 182331 11/17/97 $63.88 TARGET Drill /spikes 35434 PRO SHOP GENERAL SUPPLI 9022 < *> $63.88* 182332 11/17/97 $350.00 TEDDY BEAR BAND Service Edinborough 112897 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $350.00* 182333' 11/17/97 $5.00 TELEPHONE ANSWERING CENT Answer service 101697 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL.SUPPLI < *> $5.00* 182334 11/17/97 $359.10 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO Terminals 2149400 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 9383 11/17/97 $52.50 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO Beams 2149401 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 9383 11/17/97 $120.32 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO Terminals 1922101 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 9251 11/17/97 $108.99 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO Terminals 1922102 PUMP.& LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPLI 9251 < *> $640.91* 182335 11/17/97 $111.98 TESSMAN SEED INC Tree wrap S013256 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 9269 182336 11/17/97 $62,096.16 THOMAS & SONS CONSTRUCTI Construction 97 -3 #3 STORM SEWER NO CIP < *> $62,096.16* 182337 11/17/97 $497.53 Thomas & Sons Constructi Bituminous removal 00977504 PKBOND CIP EQUIP REPLACEM 9297 11/17/97 $853.59 Thomas & Sons Constructi Drainage work 977507, PKBOND CIP EQUIP REPLACEM 9298 11/17/97 $303.39 Thomas & Sons Constructi Art center beams 977509 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI 9299 < *> $1,654.51* 182338 11/17/97 $42.25 THOMPSON, PAUL Art work sold 110797 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $42.25* 182339 11/17/97 $15,250.00 THOMSEN - NYBECK Prosecuting 117013 LEGAL SERVICES PROF SERVICES < *> $15,250.00* 182340 11/17/97 $3,499.00 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP COST.OF GOODS SOLD BE 119005 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 11/17/97 $1,754.10 THORPE- DISTRIBUTING COMP COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 119507 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE < *> $5,253.10* 182341 11/17/97 $10.18 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPL Oxygen for cutting to 136526 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLI 9172 11/17/97 $44.99. TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPL Welding gas 138864 DISTRIBUTION- GENERAL SUPPLI 9135 < *> $55.17* 182342 11/17/97 $415.20 TRACY /TRIPP FUELS Diesel fuel 58640 MAINT OF COURS GASOLINE 4142 < *> $415.20* 182343 11/17/97 $121.00 Tri -Tech Electrical Cont Contracted repairs 3128 POOL OPERATION CONTR REPAIRS < *> $121.00 *.. 182344 11/17/97 $1,955.34 TUFFCOAT URETHANE FLOOR Painting 1172 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 7610 < *> $1,955.34* 182345 11/17/97 $42.50 Twin Cities Service Cent Radio repair I13560 EQUIPMENT OPER RADIO SERVICE 11/17/97 $45.16 Twin Cities Service Cent Radio service I13561 EQUIPMENT OPER RADIO SERVICE 11/17/97 $50.00 Twin Cities Service Cent Repair radio I13562 EQUIPMENT OPER RADIO SERVICE 11/17/97 $42.50 Twin Cities Service Cent Radio service I13563 EQUIPMENT OPER RADIO SERVICE 11/17/97 $95.00 Twin Cities Service Cent Radio service I13567 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONTR REPAIRS, 9236 11/17/97 $351.10 Twin Cities'Service Cent Radio service I13568 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONTR REPAIRS 9236 COUNCIL rC REGISTER 1- jV -1997 (19:10) page 29 CHECK NO - - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 182345 11/17/97 $96.61 Twin Cities Service Cent Reoair handheld I13573 ------------------------- EQUIPMENT OPER RADIO SERVICE ------ - - - - -- < *> $722.87* 182346 11/17/97 $48.00 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO Oxygen 391111 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 4090 < *> $48.00* 182347 11/17/97 $81.90 Ultimate Golf COST OF GOODS - PRO S 047744 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 4536 < * >" $81.90* 182348 11/17/97 $127.78 United Electric Wire 30488000 PKBOND CIP EQUIP REPLACEM 9157 < *> $127.78* 182349 11/17/97 $100.00 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Workshop 111097 PUBLIC HEALTH CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $100.00* 182350 11/17/97 $678.38 UPBEAT INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 217556 ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPLI 9100 < *> $678.38* 182351 11/17/97 $55.60 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 111797 DARE TELEPHONE 11/17/97 $3,365.57 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 111797 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE 11/17/97 $243.77 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 111797 ART CENTER BLD TELEPHONE 11/17/97 $55.60 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 111797 SKATING & HOCK TELEPHONE 11/17/97 $958.52 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 111797 CLUB HOUSE TELEPHONE 11/17/97 $59.87 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 111797 MAINT OF COURS TELEPHONE 11/17/97 $2.01 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 111797 POOL OPERATION TELEPHONE 11/17/97 $330.54 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 111797 ARENA BLDG /GRO TELEPHONE 11/17/97 $109.33 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 111797 ED BUILDING & TELEPHONE 11/17/97 $55.60 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 111797 PUMP & LIFT ST TELEPHONE 11/17/97 $191.12 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 111797 VERNON OCCUPAN TELEPHONE < *> $5,427.53* 182352 11/17/97 $350.00 VALLIERE, JOHN Registration 102797 GOLF ADMINISTR CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $350.00* 182353 11/17/97 $284.13 Van Bloem Gardens Easter TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUB 194907 ED BUILDING.& TREES FLWR SHR 8642 < *> $284.13* 182354 11/17/97 $149.30 VAN PAPER CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD 188074 CLUB HOUSE COST OF GD SOL 7081 < *> $149.30* 182355 11/17/97 $381.48 VANTAGE.ELECTRIC Electrical repairs 14714 ED BUILDING & CONTR REPAIRS 9407 < *> $381.48* 182356 11/17/97 $100.00 WALBRIDGE, DAVID Program Edinborough 113097 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $100.00* 182357 11/17/97 $100.00 WALSH, WILLIAM Police service NOV 1997 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES < *> $100.00* 182358 11/17/97 $26.49 WALTON, DANIEL Art work sold 110797 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $26.49* 182359 11/17/97 $322.55 WARNING LITES OF MINNESO Signs 1023093 STREET RENOVAT GENERAL SUPPLI 8913 11/17/97 $351.45 WARNING LITES OF MINNESO Cones 25881 PAVEMENT MARKI GENERAL SUPPLI 9175 < *> $674.00* COUNCIL CHEC& REGISTER 12 -NOV -1997 (19:10) page 30' CHECK NO -----------------------------.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 182360 11/17/97 $19.00 Waste News Waste news subscri p ti 111797 RECYCLING DUES & SUBSCRI *> $19.00* 182361 11/17/97 $97.50 Weiss, Beth Prof serv.AC 110897. ART CENTER PROF SERVICES 11/17/97 $72.00 Weiss, Beth CRAFT SUPPLIES 110897 -ADM ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES <*> $169.50* 182362 1.1/17/97 .$248.30 Welsh, Liz Art work sold 110797 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER " < *> $248.-30* 182363 11/17/97 $493.93 WEST WELD SUPPLY CO. Drill bits" 9687 PUMP & LIFT ST TOOLS 9358 11/17/97 $722.71 WEST WELD SUPPLY CO. Drill bite 9848_ EQUIPMENT OPER.ACCESSORIES 9077 11/17/97 $241.78 WEST WELD SUPPLY CO. Drill bits 10038" EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 9154 < *> - $11458..42* 182364 11/17/97 $249.10 Wilson-, Barbara Overpayment ambulance '971567 GENERAL FD PRO AMBULANCE -FEES < *> $249.10* - 182365 11/17/97 $492.76 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 12226 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 11/17/97 $2,446,29 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 12227 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 11/17/97 $410.84 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 12228 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/17/97 $2,263.14, WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 12229 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/17/97 $1,166.02 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 12230 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/17/97 $717.51 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 12560 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/17/97 $1,840.25 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 12562 YORK SELLING CST OF -GD WINE 11/17/97 $726.19 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI- 12563• .50TH ST-SELLIN CST OF GD WINE .11/17/97 $88.00 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 12704 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $10,151-.00* 182366 11/17/97 $107.00 WINE MERCHANTS COST,OF GOODS. SOLD WI 21190 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/17/97 $147.00 WINE MERCHANTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 21191 YORK SELLING- CST OF GD WINE. < *> $254:00* 182367 11/17/97 $775.20 WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY` Range pails 59966 GOLF DOME RANGE BALLS 9443 11/17/97 $2,376.00 WITTEK.GOLF SUPPLY RANGE BALLS 60177 GOLF-DOME RANGE BALLS 9246 11/17/97 $288.78 WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY RANGE BALLS DE1885 GOLF DOME RANGE BALLS < *> $3,439.98* 182368 11/17/97 $104.00 WOOD, CRAIG.. Art work sold 110797 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $104.00* 182369. 1.1/17/97 '$157.00 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 65595 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 11/17/97 - $66.00: WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS `SOLD WI 65789 VERNON SELLING CST OF.GD WINE 11/17/97 $802.76 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 65819 `YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/17/97 .$588:10 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 65820 50TH ST SELLIN,CST OF GD WINE 11/17/97 $529.41 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI -65821 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/17/97 - $69.50 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST.OF GOODS.SOLD WI. 65897 50TH ST "SELLIN.CST OF GD WINE - 11/17/97 - $281.91 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 66015 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/17/97 - $17.00 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 66088 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/17/97 - $37.62. WORLD.. CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 66089 50TH ST_SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 11/17/97 $688.48 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 66124 SOTH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE < *> $2-,857.54* 182370 11/17/97 $100.00 WROBLESKI, HENRY Police service NOV 1997•RESERVE.PROGRA PERS SERVICES < *> 4100.00* - COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 12 -NOV -1997 (19:10) page 31 CHECK NO DATE -----------------------------:----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION. INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 182371 11/17/97 $939.27 XEROX CORPORATION ----- Maint charge 59310792 CENT SVC GENER EQUIP RENTAL < *> $939.27* 182372 11/17/97 $137.80 Yungner, Dave Art work sold 110797 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $137.80* 182373 ' .11/17/97 $1,072.00 Zahl Equipment Co Tank repair 67800 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 8072 < *> $1,072.00* 182374 11/17/97 $202.27 Zapatka Enterprises Inc COST OF GOODS - PRO S 6100 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 9013 < *> $202.27* 182375 11/17/97 $39.43 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE Drugs 54150899 CITY HALL GENE GENERAL SUPPLI 9509 < *> $39.43* 182376 11/17/97 $702.15 ZIEGLER INC Repair SWI40004 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 11/17/97 $5,112.00 ZIEGLER INC Cat rental 3879601 GENERAL MAINT EQUIP RENTAL 8772 < *> $5,814.15* 182377 11/17/97 $48.75 ZINS, JANE Art works sold 110797 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $48.75* $943,426.66* COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY 12 -NOV -1997 (19:13) page 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FUND # 10 GENERAL FUND $243,254.33 FUND # 11 COMMUNITY DEVELP. BLOCK GR $8,510.00 FUND # 15 WORKING CAPITAL $14,261.98 FUND # 23 ART CENTER $9,071.13 FUND # 25 GOLF DOME FUND $9,272.30 FUND # 26 SWIMMING POOL FUND $2,195.39 FUND # .27 GOLF COURSE FUND $22,191.18 FUND# 28 ICE ARENA FUND $102,317.81 FUND # 30 EDINBOROUGH /CENTENNIAL LAK $13,099.31 FUND # 40 UTILITY FUND $37,234.11 FUND # 41 STORM SEWER UTILITY FUND $3,475.29 FUND # 42 RECYCLING PROGRAM $433.95 FUND # 50 LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND $230,458.04 FUND # 60 CONSTRUCTION FUND $103,995.20 FUND # 61 PARK BOND FUND $143,615.29 FUND # 73 I -494 COMMISSION $41.35 $943,426.66* COUNCIL. CHECK REGISTER 06 -NOV -1997 (18:55) page 1 CHECK NO -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------7---------------------- CHECK DT CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. 169441 10/03/97 $271,000.00 CITY OF EDINA Payroll transfer 100397 LIQUOR PROG CASH 10/03/97 - $271,000.00 CITY OF EDINA Payroll transfer 100397 LIQUOR PROG CASH < *> $0.00* 169442 10/17/97 $287,000.00 CITY OF EDINA Payroll transfer 101797 LIQUOR PROG CASH 10/17/97 - $287,000.00 CITY OF EDINA Payroll transfer 101797 LIQUOR PROG CASH <*> $0.00* 169443- 10/24/97 •$681.49 Golden Valley Microwave Interest /sales tax re 102497 GENERAL FD PRO MISCELLANOUS < *> $681.49* 169444 10/31/97 $345,000.00 CITY OF EDINA Payroll transfer 103197 LIQUOR.PROG CASH 10/31/97 - $345,000.00 CITY OF EDINA Payroll transfer 103197 LIQUOR PROG CASH < *> $0.00* 181183 10/13/97 $283.83 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 536360 YORK SELLING CST. OF GD WINE 10/13/97 - $56.50 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 537908 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 10/13/97 $202.96 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 537964 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 10/13/97 $202.96 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 538218 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 10/13/97 $792.13 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 538388 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 10/13/97 $2,326.32 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 538389 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 10/13/97 $3,514.46 '- QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 538390 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 10/13/97 $171.27 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 538391 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF..GD WINE 10/13/97 $222.75 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 538393 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 10/13/97 $85.64 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 538395 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 10/13/97 $28.93 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 538792 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 10/13/97 $952.01 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 538802 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 10/13/97 $3,869.70 QUALITY WINE COST.OF GOODS SOLD LI 538804 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 10/13/97 $4,026.21 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 538805 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 10/13/97 - $132.00 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD.WI 539695 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $16,490.67* 181575 10/20/97 $480.69 FastFrame Framing for APWA 21362441 TRAINING CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $480.69* 181576 10/20/97 $200,439.88 Fenc -CO Inc Construction 97 -8PK #2 PKBOND CIP EQUIP REPLACEM < *> $200,439.88* 181577 10/20/97 $26,304.32 Friedges Landscaping In Construction 97 -6PK #3 PKBOND CIP EQUIP REPLACEM < *> $26,304.32* 181578 10/20/97 $400,000.00 HRA /CITY OF EDINA HRA Advance 101697 GENERAL FD•PRO DUE FRM OTH FD < *> $400,000.00* 181579 10/20/97 $764.56 LEITNER COMPANY SOD & BLACK DIRT 930 MAINT OF COURS SOD & DIRT 10/20/97 $764.56 LEITNER COMPANY SOD.& BLACK DIRT 930 RICHARDS MAINT SOD & DIRT < *> $1,529.12* 181580 10/20/97 $298.25 MCNEILUS STEEL Steel 158398 STREET RENOVAT CONCRETE 8061 < *> $298.25* .181581 10/20/97 $3.51- Matrix Communications I Balance due 0029468. CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $3.51* 181582 10/20/97 $46.74 PERA PERA 102097 GENERAL'FD PRO P.E.R.A. PAYAB COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 06 -NUV -1997 (18:55) page 2 CHECK NO CHECK DT CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ < *> $46.74* 181583 10/20/97 $59,569.54 PERA PERA 102097 GENERAL FD PRO P.E.R.A. PAYAB < *> $59,569.54* 181584 10/20/97 ; -$7.97 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 540183 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 10/20/97 - $12.25 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 540202 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 10/20/97 $1,088.52 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 540654 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 10/20/97 $2,387.81 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 540655 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 10/20/97 $215.82 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 540657 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 10/20/97 $1,857.74' QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 540960- VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 10/20/97 $34.44 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 541138 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 10/20/97 $36.00 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 541139 VERNON SELLING CST.OF GD WINE 10/20/97 $675.98 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 541140 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 10/20/97 $3,509.54 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 541201 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU - 10/20/97 $3,596.20, QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 541203 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD.LIQU 10/20/97 $476.68 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 541857 YORK SELLING CST OF GD.LIQU < *> $13,858.51* 181585 10/27/97 $15.00 MINNEGASCO KITCHEN VENT SEMINAR 102497 INSPECTIONS CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $15.00* 181586 10/27/97 - $24.03 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 541959 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 10/27/97 $1,017.64 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 542283 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 10/27/97 $974.85 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 542284 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 10/27/97 $116.82 - QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 542876 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 10/27/97 $1,954.20 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 542927 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 10/27/97 $2,014.34 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI. 543172 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU , 10/27/97 $3,916.14 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD.LI 543182 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU. 10/27/97 $5,605.44 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS.SOLD LI 543183 YORK SELLING, CST'OF GD LIQU 10/27/97 $415.60 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 543183 - YORK SELLING -CST OF GD WINE . 10/27/97 $589.22 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 544052 YORK SELLING CST OF GD.LIQU < *> $16,580.22* 181968 11/03/97 $1,122.50 AAA Registration 21.101 102797 EQUIPMENT OPER LIC & PERMITS < *> $1,122.50*, 181969 11/03/97 $96,551.25 AIRENA INC Partial dome 102897 GC CIP DOME CIP < *> $96,551.25* 181970 11/03/97 $183.68 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR TELEPHONE 101097. DISTRIBUTION TELEPHONE 11/03/97 $237.40 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR TELEPHONE 101097. ENGINEERING GE TELEPHONE 11/03/97 $106.53 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR TELEPHONE 101097. SUPERV. & OVRH TELEPHONE < *> $527.61* 181971 11/03/97 $419.29 JUSTUS LUMBER Lumber. 95081. PKBOND CIP EQUIP REPLACEM 9080 < *> $419.29* 181972 11/03/97 $14,872.18 Jack McClard & Associat EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 005312 EQUIPMENT OPER EQUIP REPLACEM 4169 < *> $14,872.18* 181973 .11/03/97 $346.27 Johnson Wholesale Flori TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUB 23261. ED BUILDING & TREES'FLWR SHR 8056 11/03/97 $306.33 Johnson Wholesale Flori TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUB 26769. ED BUILDING & TREES FLWR SHR 9202 < *> $652.60* s COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 06 -NOV -1997 (18:55) 3 page CHECK NO ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CHECK DT CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. 181974 11/03/97 $5,332.88 LJR INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1494/32 I -494 COMMISSI PROF SERVICES < *> $5,332.88* 181975 11/03/97 $1,000.00 MARK VII SALES Beer balance due 700080. YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE < *> $1,000.00* 181976 11/03/97 $46.74 PERA PERA 110397 GENERAL'FD PRO P.E.R.A. PAYAB < *> $46.74* 181977 11/03/97 $60,183.94 PERA PERA 110397 GENERAL FD PRO P.E.R.A. PAYAB < *> $60,183.94* 181978 11/03/97 $5,000.00 POSTMASTER POSTAGE 102997 CENT SVC GENER POSTAGE < *> $5;000.00* 181979 11/03/97 $1,808.63 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 544053 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 11/03/97 $2,672.51 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 544654 50TH 3T.SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 11/03/97 $1,419.95 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 544655 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/03/97 $3,687.74 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 544657 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/03/97 $396.97 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 545128 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/03/97 $396.97 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 545129 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/03/97 $396.97 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 545132 50TH ST'SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 11/03/97 $27.48 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 545174 50TH ST SELLIN.CST OF GD LIQU 11/03/97 $4,712.25 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 545358 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 11/03/97 $1,312.71 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 545359 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF'GD LIQU 11/03/97 $36.00 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 545360 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 11/03/97 $3,373.52 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 545363 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU < *> $20,241.70* $942,248.63* .COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY FOR HAND CHECKS 06 -NOV -1997 (18:57) page 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ FUND # 10 GENERAL FUND_ $542,664.51 FUND # 27 GOLF COURSE FUND $98,080.37 FUND # 30 EDINBOROUGH /CENTENNIAL LAK $652:60 FUND # 40 UTILITY FUND $183.68 FUND # 50 LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND $68,171.10 FUND # 61 PARK BOND FUND $227,163.49 FUND # 73 I -494 COMMISSION $5,332.88 $942,248.63* 1 �I r WEST. METRO EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM HISTORY 1989 . Mpls, 5 districts discussion of - - -- - -- - metropo. itan esegregation__ 1990 CIIP created - 9 districts legislative funding - first voluntary effort to deal with desegregation issues in a major metropolitan area 1991 Study on issues - Guidelines for Cooperative Interdistrict Integration Programs 1992 Three pilot programs - three magnet schools Order .established of implementation - downtown, northwest, southwest Morris and Associates did survey and concluded. "with_ a substantial marketing effort, a voluntary desegregation effort linking.MPLS and the inner ring suburban school districts would have an eminent likelihood for success" 83 % in Edina favor or strongly favor having students of color from Mpls in the district and 70% o would favor or strongly favor white children from their district attending Mpls schools 1993 Nine districts approve a resolution endorsing the concept of the downtown school and direct the completion of the school plan 1994 Legislative funding for east and west metro desegregation programs Implementation begins on downtown school project 1995 Joint Powers agreement established and Joint Powers Board implemented Process of development _of downtown school committees for a K -12 school Interdistrict Professional Development Center -Exp oratory activities - underwa -y for - northwest school Cultural exchanges among schools 1996 Downtown school site determined Robbinsdale site continues to be developed as a middle school Legislative support for construction and planning Discussion of southwest magnet location occurs again 1997 Downtown school groundbreaking Northwest magnet program approved as a Fine Arts Middle School magnet in. Robbinsdale Legislative funding for beginning of construction. and purchasing of land for southwest magnet site * the enhancement of educational opportunities through the offering of interdistrict educational opportunities in integrated efforts GOALS OF .WME P * Create multicultural lea- ring experiences for students and teachers throughout participating districts * Create prototype schools that model interdistrict cooperation and collaboration * Identify and share best practices for curriculum, instruction, and assessment that are effective in supporting the achievement of all students and in closing the learning gaps * Explore and refine delivery system improvements HISTORY OF SITE REQUEST FOR EDINA Edina, because of its location relative to the other wMEP districts, has since the beginning of the project been 'perceived as an excellent location _of _a- magnet_school__ * Land was available due to city actions, ideal site * Met with city in the spring to seek input on the site * Then went to legislature, governor's office, and commissioner of education to seek state funding for the land * Sept - Edina School Board resolution formally requesting that the City of Edina designate the proposed property as a possible, magnet -school site until such time as WMEP and the City of Edina determine that the site is suitable for this use * Architects looked at site for possible school and bus garage and shared information with district and city * October - Joint Powers Board of WMEP passes a resolution directing the representatives of the Edina Public Schools negotiate on behalf of the West Metro Education Program for the -urchase .of the med property * Request for Proposal for Southwest Magnet school distributed with target date of January 1 for program planner * November Presentation to City Council on this issue FEATURES OF THE WMEP SCHOOL * K- 5 or K -6 elementary school * Program determined by districts Gym. and auditorium space * State of art technology * Easy access to WMEP districts Bus traffic impact minimized * Lab school concept * State funded - both property and building BENEFITS OF WIVIEP SCHOOL TO EDINA * Opportunity for our parents to have another choice for their children that entails more diversity Learning lab will allow us to train teachers and staff in working with issues of diversity * Choice is in our community and close to our families, traveling outside the district not necessary * Can utilize this facility after hours of operation - help relieve stress of gym and theater use in Edina * Provides a relief valve for increased enrollment in the Edina elementary schools - Guaranteed a minimum of slots for our students * No additional cost to the district * Responds to legislative and state issues relative to diversity NEXT STEPS? * Do you have enough information or do you want us to complete the RFP process? * Legislative process to secure additional funding for the land and building construction * Planner will be underway for a southwest magnet somewhere, preferably Edina * Impact on bus garage decision on the site WEST METRO EDUCATION PROGRAM An Historical Perspective... As we transition into the operational phases of metropolitan integration/ desegregation planning, it is helpful to review the work of the nine - district CIIP /WMEP consortium from an historical perspective, and to acknowledge the important leadership of the School Boards and Superintendents to create a vision for racially integrated schools in the metropolitan area. 1989 4Boards from Minneapolis c±,h�rban district° '41� ^*�� ^^+ ^^ Ad a, u ^P o; Gt. Louis Park, Richfield) endorse a series of "consensus pointsde the districts in cooperative planning to facilitate gation. cuorrs iauered when legislation failed to provide funding for planning. 1990 4The Cooperative Interdistrict Integration—Project ( IiP) Steering Committep was formed with ti representaves from Minneapolis Public Schools and its eight contiguous suburban districts (Brooklyn Center, Columbia Heights, Edina, Hopkins, Richfield, Robbinsdale, St. Anthony /New Brighton, St. Louis Park). Legislative funding supported planning efforts. 1991 4Throughout 1991 the CUP Steering Committee worked with national desegregation expert, Len Stevens, to develop a set of formal guidelines that es parameters within which interdistrict integration programs would be designed and operated. These "Guidelines for Cooperative Interdistrict Integration Programs" were approved by each of the nine school boards in November, 1991. 1992 4The CIIP Steering Committee solicited r0RgSalc frnm na_ rfir' t'nv riiqtd= � rflot interdistrict programs. Three planning proposals emerged: • A K -3 Northwest /Robbinsdale -area magnet school with a programmatic focus on outcome based/ multicultural education. • A K -3 Southwest -area magnet school with a programmatic focus on Glasser's "Quality Schools" an an outcomes approach to education. • A K -3 magnet school in downtown Minneapolis with a programmatic focus on multicultural, experiential learning. The Steering Committee decided to focus its initial planning efforts on the Downtown cxlw4A proposal when it became clear that legislative funding for program implementation would not support three separate initiatives. In the event that additional funding became available at a later date, the Steering Committee prioritized the remaining two proposals as follows: #1, Northwest/ Robbinsdale- area interdistrict magnet school; #2, Southwest -area interdistrict magnet schooL 4A Downtown School Task Force was formed, comprised of teachers, adininistrators, and parents from each of the nine districts. The Task Force was charged to develop a program design for an interdistrict school. kl4The CUP Steering Committee retained Bill Morris and DecisioA.R�so»r s + co ^,� to �,rt a ra tom survey of paren in each o e nine istncts to obtain attitudinal and opinion data about their interest in voluntary integration programs. The survey demonstrated that a substantial number of households in the nine districts would be willing to participate in a voluntary desegregation effort, and that a key marketing theme for such an effort should be based on the concept of fostering diversity in the public schools. Bill Morris concluded from the data that "with a sustained general marketing effort, a voluntary desegregation effort linking Minneapolis and the inner ring suburban school districts would have an eminent likelihood for success." 1993 4School future action by the boards. Downtown mnletion of 4The 1993 Legislature failed to appropriate additional funding for on -going planning and implementation of interdistrict integration efforts. 1994 4metro -area superintendents collaborated on a legislarivP *+1an that resulted in state funding for implementation of east- and west -metro desegregation programs. 4The Minnesota Department of Education awarded $700,000 to the West Metro Education Program (WMEP, formerly known as CUP) for implementation o a owntown Interdistrict Magnet School and staff development center, and for continued planning of future interdistrict sites in the west metro area. 1995 4A coordinator (Ginny Pease ) was hired by WMEP to lead the lanning and development of the Downtown terdistrict Magnet School, scheduled to open in Fall, 1. 4Ke. Pnt;fiPti frnm each district to coordinate/ facilitate the planning process within their respective districts. 4School site selection criteria were developed and various sites /facilities in the Downtown Minneapolis area have been considered for co- location of the interdistrict magnet school and professional development center. CIA Downtown Interdistrict Magnet School Design Team was formed with representation by staff, administrators, an par rom ea of the nine districts, and charged to design and construct an interdistrict education program. 4The Interdistrict Professional Development Center offered opportunities for staff from the nine districts to participate cooperative y in a 'Best Practices" conference, multicultural mini- sabbaticals, and various summer professional development activities. 4Exploratory activities are underway for a second WMEP magnet school to be located in the No e=are' a, the original CUP priorities. George Lillquist (a Robbinsdale principal on special assignment) was hired by WMEP to lead the second interdistrict planning and development effort. 4A four -week WMEP Summer Cultural Exchange Program — "Arts & Community: Building Blocks" -was developed, funded, and offered to students from the nine WMEP districts. 4The School Boards in each of the nine districts have appointed a member to serve along with the superintendent (non - voting) on a WMEP Joint Powers Board that will provide a governance structure for WMEP projects. V .% West Metro Education Program Guidelines for Cooperative Interdistrict Integration Programs Participating School Districts The Minneapolis Public Schools ( "city district ") and the school districts of Brooklyn Center, Columbia Heights, Edina, Hopkins, Richfield, Robbinsdale, St. Anthony /New Brighton and St. Louis Park ( "suburban districts ") form a consortium known as the West Metro Education Program (WMEP). The WMEP Districts agree that theses Guidelines shall apply to all interdistrict integration programs which involve the city district and any or all of the suburban districts. Vision The city and suburban districts share a mutual commitment to 'a racially integrated metropolitan area, to equal educational opportunities for all children, and to the enhancement of educational opportunities through interdistrict educational options in integrated settings. Toward this end, the districts agree to create interdistrict magnet schools that will serve as models of integration, cooperation, and collaboration, and to develop cooperative staff development programs that enhance multicultural understanding and best practices. The districts further agree that each district will participate in one or more of such programs as programs and funding are developed. See "Approval" section of these Guidelines. Purpose of Guidelines The purpose of these Guidelines is to assure the equitable and consistent treatment of all participants in all of the interdistrict integration programs that are developed and operated by the. districts. Scope of Programs Programs may involve the interdistrict enrollment of students as follows: • between various schools in participating districts; or • between designated schools in participating districts; or • in interdistrict specialty schools; or • in interdistrict laboratory schools designed both to educate students and to serve as a center for staff development, curriculum development, and family education Additional activities may be added to enhance or support an interdistrict program. Programs may provide for interdistrict staff and board development, interdistrict staff visits, and interdistrict staff exchanges. Programs may include training and information activities, interdistrict school visits, and school volunteer activities for families and other citizens. Programs may include provision for partnerships with universities, businesses, cultural institutions, government agencies and other non - school entities. Community Involvement i ne Plan for each program will be developed by the participating districts with meaningful involvement of communities of color and the community as a whole. Staff Development All staff involved directly or indirectly in an interdistrict integration program will receive appropriate and timely training in the purpose and design of the interdistrict program and, in addition, in such integration - related areas as effective instructional strategies for diverse learners, inclusive education, human relations, the expected outcomes and characteristics of effective integrated education, methods of linking results- oriented education to integration, working with diverse family populations, avoiding classroom re- segregation, positive methods of student discipline, and principles of equal educational opportunity. District Commitments Participating districts agree to provide orientation and awareness training for stakeholders, to disseminate information on desegregation/ integration, and to facilitate interaction among administrators, staff, students, and families. Participating districts agree to establish interdistrict training opportunities in order to prepare school board members, administrators, curriculum specialists, teachers and support staff, and to provide them with the knowledge and skills needed to effectively deliver educational services in an integrated setting. Goals of WMEP Programs The primary goals of WMEP programs are: • to create multicultural exchanges for students and teachers. • to create prototype schools that model interdistrict cooperation and collaboration. • to share curricular expertise. • to explore and refine delivery system improvements. Each program will reflect these primary goals through its objectives and programmatic content. In support of these goals, the districts agree to focus WMEP programs on voluntary student placements in interdistrict schools. Program PIans Each program will have a written plan. Each Plan will be developed jointly by representatives of the districts participating in the program being developed. The Plan for each program, at minimum, will include these components: a ) clear and integrative objectives b)• family information and participation c) community awareness and public information d) orientation and preparatory training of participating students and families e) other preparation activities f) description of programs and type of placements available g) application procedure h) transportation service i) staff development j) timely transfer of student records k) provision for review or development of learner outcomes and instructional materials I) complaint resolution procedure for students and families m) project assessment procedures, including data collection, data analysis, and reporting n) estimated cost and projected revenue source(s), including those for transportation o) staff selection / placement procedures. Application Procedure The school districts participating in each program will jointly, develop and monitor a procedure for applications, admissions, and placements, of students in the m6 ferdistrict program. In the interest of families, the application procedure will beimplemented by the host school district, use fair and published criteria, .. and afford all eligible families timely notice of deadlines and °admissions decisions. The confidentiality of student records will be protected_ by the procedure. Admissions decisions will be guided by principles of equal opportunity and the goal of integrated education. Assurances t'o-Pardcipatmg- Students - Once enrolled in a WMEP program, students will be entitled to the same rights and responsibilities as they would have in any other school. . Each W YMP program will develop entrance and exit,guidelines (assurances) that embrace principles of fairness and equity in areas such as: sibling preference, program withdrawal, waiting lists, etc. Transportation Transportation will be provided free of charge. to participating students for travel to and from interdistrict schools. Supplementary transportation will be provided such students to allow them to participate fully in after - school activities. Where summer school is offered as part of an interdistrict integration program, student transportation will be provided. Interdistrict programs will make reasonable provision for transportation service to interdistrict families in support of school- related activities such as orientation meetings and family- teacher conferences. District Support of Interdistrict Integration Participating districts agree to support interdistrict integration through individual district activities including but not limited to the following:. a) Recruitment, training, and placement of instructional and leadership staff from diverse backgrounds to ensure greater staff diversity in all and especially schools serving interdistrict students. b) Aggressive implementation of inclusive education. . c) Systematic application in participating schools of effective school desegregation/ integration principles. d) Continuous review of the rules and practices of participating school, and their outcomes, for the purpose of identifying and eliaunating any inequities relative to inteidistrict students. e) Leadership development programs for principals and site -based teams in participating schools to enhance their ability to provide leadership for integrated schools. f) Activities and programs for students designed to welcome and involve interdistrict students in the life of their schools. g) Recruitment of school volunteers who are reflective of the diversity of students and families in the school Participating districts agree not to engage in nor to condone the following activities relative to interdistrict programs: a) Selective recruiting of students based on''athletic ability, academic record, test scores, or any other attribute or characteristic which is not demonstrably related to a specific interdistrict educational program. fA '__` It b) Exclusion of students from admission to programs based on academic record, test scores, attendance pattern, disciplinary record or similar factors, except to the extent that such factors are relevant to admission criteria set forth in the Plan for the interdistrict integration program. c) Removal of students from programs except as provided by established school district policies or written rules and /or rules on removal as set forth in the PIan for the interdistrict program. d) Review of school records of students seeking admission to an interdistrict program except as provided in the admission procedure agreed upon by the participating districts. e) Capping of admissions to a district or to a school at an arbitrary level notwithstanding the availability of space so as to limit the participation level of a racial group, except for the purpose of complying with desegregation requirements set by law, regulation, or the Plan for the interdistrict program. f) Exclusion of grade levels from an interdistrict program for any reason other than unavailability of space. g) Exclusion of interdistrict students with special needs unless programs appropriate for such students are not offered to any students, including resident students. h) Discouragement of students from participating in interdistrict programs. Approval Each interdistrict program shall involve the Minneapolis Public Schools and one or more of these school districts: Brooklyn Center, Columbia Heights, Edina, Hopkins, Richfield, Robbinsdale, St. Anthony /New Brighton, St. Louis Park. Each interdistrict program shall be authorized by the boards of education of the districts participating in the program. Administration Responsibility for the administration of each interdistrict program shall rest with the districts participating in the program acting through their superintendents or their designees. This body of superintendents shall serve as the administrative body for each interdistrict program. The body of superintendents may delegate authority to a host district for management and operation of an interdistrict program. Funding Interdistrict programs are expected to be supported by special state funds, supplemented at times by foundation grants andh/or other private- sector contributions. The districts participating in each interdistrict program agree to work cooperatively with the program's fiscal agent in the securing of funds, including but not limited to state appropriations, needed for the programs. Each interdistrict program shall have a fiscal agent which will be one of the districts participating in the program unless other provision is made by the funding source. Whenever possible, the host district shall serve as the fiscal agent for interdistrict programs located in that district. The fiscal agent shall be accountable for program funds, including their appropriate receipt and disbursement, within the parameters established in the Plan for the interdistrict program. In addition, the fiscal agent will periodically, or at the request of another participating district, report the status of program funding and expenditures to the other districts participating in the interdistrict program. Law ' All interdistrict programs shall conform to federal and state law and regulations. JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT FOR THE WEST METRO EDUCATION PROGRAM (WMEP) This MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT, entered into on the dates indicated herein (below), by and between one -or more of the following SCHOOL DISTRICTS, Special School District No. 1, (also known as Minneapolis Public Schools), Independent School District No. 273 (also known as Edina Public -Schools), Independent School District No. 270, (also known as Hopkins Public Schools), Independent School District.No. 281,.(also known as Robbinsdale Area Schools), Independent School District No. 286, (also known as Brooklyn Center Public Schools), Independent School District No. 280, (also known as Richfield Public Schools), Independent School District No. 282, (also known as St. Anthony/New Brighton Public Schools), Independent School District No. 283, (also known as St. 'Louis Park Public Schools), and Independent School District No. 13, (also known as Columbia Heights Public. Schools), hereinafter referred to collectively as "the Members" and individually as "Member," WITNESSETII THAT: WHEREAS, the members are organized for the purpose of providing public school education for persons within their geographical boundaries, and WHEREAS, each of the members is interested in cooperating with other members in acquiring lands and buildings, organizing, establishing; financing, maintaining and operating jointly one or more cooperative Interdistrict Education Program(s) upon a site or sites to be selected, and WHEREAS, the members are eligible to organize a JOINT Board of school Districts pursuant Minnesota Statue Section 471.59 and other applicable statues for such purposes. NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises herein contained, the Members do hereby agree as follows: I. NAME The name of the joint Board of school Districts hereby established shall be the West Metro Education Program, (hereinafter referred to as "WMEP "). II. PURPOSE A. The purpose of this Agreement is to establish a governing organization through which the Members may jointly and cooperatively establish educational programming at one or f. l more sites located within the metropolitan area. The educational programming established shall include comprehensive performance oriented curricula and instruction and may include, but shall not necessarily be limited to, early childhood education, elementary education, secondary education, adult learning, extended day /extended year learning opportunities, and child care. B. The organization's purpose shall be accomplished through a management and/or service contract or contracts. C. The educational programs established shall be evaluated periodically. D. Particpation in any and all educational programs shall be on a voluntary basis for all parties concerned, including students, families, and Districts. III. BOARD OF TRUSTEES A. The WMEP shall be governed by a Board of Trustees with each participating Member District appointing one representative to serve a one year term. A majority of the Trustees entitled to vote shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at any regular or special meeting of the Board of Trustees. IV. POWERS AND DUTIES OF BOARD A. The Board of Trustees shall have the authority to exercise any power and take any action which any or each of the Members are by law authorized to exercise in implementing the purpose of part II -A. The Board shall have the authority to function as an entity separate and apart from any of the Members and generally to act for the Members in furtherance of their joint interests and intentions here under. B. At its first meeting, the Board shall elect a Chair, Vice - Chair, Secretary and Treasurer, who shall serve until the first Annual Meeting of the Board. At the Annual meeting, the Board shall elect an Executive Committee, which shall include such officers designated above. The Executive Committee shall conduct the business of the Board between meetings. No Member District shall have more than one representative serving on the Executive Committee. C. The Board of Trustees shall take such action as it deems necessary and proper to accomplish the purposes of WMEP, or any other action necessary and incidental to the implementation of said purpose or action. Any of the stated activities may be accomplished by entering into contracts, leases or agreements with a Member District or others, whenever the Board of Trustees shall deem such action to be advisable. D. The Board of Trustees may solicit and accept gifts, apply for and use grants of money or other property from the state or any other type of organization, and may enter into agreements required in connection therewith,' to further the stated purpose of WMEP. E. The Board of Trustees shall adopt policies, regulations and an annual budget for the conduct of WMEP, and shall otherwise 'manage; supervise and control all activities of WMEP commensurate with the Members' legal obligations. F. Pursuant to MN statutes 466.07, and other applicable laws, no Member shall have individual liability for the debts and obligations of the Board. To the extent permitted bylaw, WMEP shall indemnify, defendand hold harmless each Trustee and Officer from and' against any claim, demand or cause of action to which such Trustee- or Officer may be made a.party by reason of being connected with this enterprise. The Board of Trustees may purchase and maintain insurance therefor: A. Any Member may withdraw from the WMEP Board and cause representatives to cease to function in such capacity upon written notice given to the chair of the .WMEP Board, such notice to be accompanied by a certified copy of an appropriate resolution of the individual Member's School Board, authorizing and directing such withdrawal from the WMEP Board. Any such withdrawal shall be effective'at the end of the school year, but such withdrawal shall not affect any Member liability for indebtness of the WMEP Board to that date. B. Other Independent School Districts, not signatory hereto, may become Members of the WMEP Board of Trustees hereafter upon-executing this Agreement and amendments thereto, if any. A certified copy of such resolution shall be furnished to the Chair of the WMEP Board, whereupon such school district shall be deemed to be a Member. ►� - • — tacel oil 0 14041 • This Agreement may be amended by an instrument executed by the parties hereto. The proposed amendment shall be recommended by the Executive Committee and notice of the proposed amendment and copies thereof shall be sent by mail to each Member of the WMEP Board not less than sixty (60) days before the prop' posed effective date of such amendment.. The proposed amendment shall not become effective until it has been executed by all Members. • u u _ u_ -0 • II I A. The Board shall be deemed to be in existence from the date when not less than two of the eligible School Districts named herein above shall have executed this Agreement. B. The WMEP Board shall continue in existence until two- thirds of its members vote for dissolution at an Annual meeting or special meeting called for the purpose of considering dissolution. C. upon dissolution of the Board, all of its property remaining after payment or reservation for debts and liabilities shall be divided among all school districts which have been Members of the WMEP Board, or among the Members of the WMEP Board at the time of such dissolution, as a majority of the Members may determine at their discretion. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this instrument to be executed on the dates appearing herein below. Independent School District No. 273 (Edina Public Schools) Superintendent Board Representative Independent School District No. 270 (Hopkins Public Schools) Superintendent Board Representative Independent School District No. 281 (Robbinsdale Area Schools) Superintendent Board Representative Independent School District No. 286 (Brooklyn Center Public Schools) Superintendent Board Representative Independent School District 280 (Richfield Public Schools) Superintendent Board Representative Independent School District No. 282(St.Anthony /New Brighton Public Schools) Superintendent Board Representative Independent School District No. 283 (St. Louis Park Public Schools) Superintendent Board Representative Independent School District No. 13 (Columbia Heights Public Schools) Superintendent Board Representative Special School District No. 1 (Minneapolis Public Schools) Superintendent Board Representative Date signed Appendix A GUIDELINES FOR COOPERATIVE.I.NTERDISTRICT INTEGRATION PROGRAMS for Brooklyn Center, Douglas Rossi, Superintendent Columbia Heights, Alain Holt, Superintendent Edina, Raymond Smyth, Superintendent Hopkins, Arthur Bruning, Superintendent Minneapolis, Robert Ferrera, Superintendent Richfield, Lowell Larson, Superintendent Robbinsdale, Linda Powell,'Superintendent St. Anthony /New Brighton, Warren Rolek, Superintendent St. Louis Park, Carl Holmstrom, Superintendent Developed by the Steering Committee for CIIP Programs October 30, 1.991 Steering Committee Lyle Baker Minneapolis Public Schools Bill Book Brooklyn Center Public Schools Diane Cowdery Hopkins Public Schools Kenneth Dragseth Edina Public Schools Jacqueline Fraedrich Robbinsdale Public Schools Duane Googins St. Anthony /New Brighton Public Donald F. Johnson Columbia Heights Public Schools Cynthia Kelly Minneapolis Public Schools Dennis Laingen Richfield Public Schools Erma McGuire St. Anthony /New Brighton Public Judi Mollerus St. Louis Park Public Schools Dennis Morrow Brooklyn Center Public Schools Mary Ann Nelson St. Louis Park Public Schools Tim Rummel Hopkins Public Schools Cynthia Tyson Minneapolis Public Schools David Vick Edina Public Schools Schools Schools Background The Minnesota State Legislature appropriated funds in 1990 -91 to support planning of voluntary interdistrict desegregation /integration programs. As a result, a state grant in the amount of $100,000 was requested and received by the Minneapolis Public Schools. The grant has supported preliminary planning by the city district and the suburban districts of Brooklyn Center, Columbia Heights, Edina, Hopkins, Richfield, Robbinsdale, St. Anthony /New Brighton and St. Louis Park. The work to date has been carried out by a steering committee of administrators representing these districts. The planning activities to date have consisted of: Creation of a steering committee representing all the districts which met throughout 1990 -91, assisted by consultants. Structured discussions by the boards of education of each of the districts for the purpose of enhancing board awareness of desegregation /integration issues and developing a sense of common purpose relative to integration among the districts at the policymaking level. Development by the steering committee of a set of "Guidelines for Cooperative Interdistrict Integration Programs." These guidelines, when endorsed by the district superintendents and adopted by the boards of education, will apply to all interdistrict integration programs developed and operated by the city district in conjunction with any or all of the suburban districts. Development by the steering committee of a set of Year II activities for 1991 -92 and an accompanying timeline. These activities will carry on the cooperative planning, and lead to community involvement, staff development, and the creation of plans for one or more specific interdistrict integration programs. Planning of a joint workshop of the boards of education of the school districts involved for the purpose of discussing issues related to integration and to interdistrict initiatives. Adoption of the "Guidelines for Cooperative Inte Programs will signal the readiness of the districts interdistrict integration programming, establish the programs of this kind will be designed and operated, are based on community involvement and include basic training and parent information, and ensure that all programs are treated consistently and equitably. rdistrict Integration to move forward toward parameters within which assure that such programs elements such as staff participants in all such Interdistrict integration programs are expected to be supported by special state funds supplemented where possible by foundation and other private- sector contributions. - 2 - Participating Oistricts The Minneapolis Public Schools ( "city district ") and the school districts of Brooklyn Center, Columbia Heights, Edina, Hopkins, Richfield, Robbinsdale, St. Anthony /New Brighton and St. Louis Park ( "suburban districts ") agree that these Guidelines shall apply to all interdistrict integration programs which involve the city district and any or all of the suburban districts. Vision The city and suburban districts share a mutual commitment to a racially integrated metropolitan area, to equal educational opportunities for all children, and to the enhancement of educational opportunities through the offering of interdistrict educational options in integrated settings. The city and suburban districts also share a common desire to develop and to engage in cooperative interdistrict integration programs. Toward this end, the districts agree that each district will participate in one or more of such programs as programs and funding are developed. See "Approval" section of these Guidelines. Purpose of Guidelines The purpose of these Guidelines is to assure the equitable and consistent treatment of all participants in all of the interdistrict integration programs that are developed and operated by the districts. Scope of Programs Programs will involve the interdistrict enrollment of students as follows: • between various schools in participating districts; or • between designated schools in participating districts; or • in an interdistrict specialty school; or • in an interdistrict laboratory school designed both to educate students and to serve as a center for staff development, curriculum development, and parent education. Additional activities may be added to enhance or support an interdistrict program. Programs may provide for interdistrict staff development, interdistrict staff visits, and interdistrict staff exchanges. Programs may include training and information activities, interdistrict school visits, and school volunteer activities for parents and other citizens. Programs may include provision for partnerships with universities, corporations, cultural institutions, government agencies and other non - school entities. - 3 - Community Involvement The plan for each program will be developed by the participating districts with meaningful involvement of communities of color and the community as a whole. Staff Preparation All staff involved directly or indirectly in an interdistrict integration program will receive appropriate and timely training in the purpose and design of the interdistrict program and, in addition, in such integration - related areas as effective instructional strategies for diverse populations, inclusive education, human relations, the expected outcomes and characteristics of effective integrated education, methods of linking outcome -based education to integration, working with diverse parent populations, avoiding classroom re- segregation, positive methods of student discipline, and principles of equal educational opportunity. District Commitments Participating districts agree to provide orientation and awareness training for stakeholders, to disseminate information on desegregation /integration, and to facilitate exchanges of administrators, staff, students and parents. Participating districts agree to establish interdistrict training opportunities in order to prepare school board members, administrators, curriculum specialists, teachers and support staff and to provide them with the knowledge and skills needed to effectively and affectively deliver educational services in an integrated setting. In the development of interdistrict integration programs, participating districts agree to make use of new programs based on needs assessments, to use current district programs, to provide incentives for voluntary teacher and student involvement, to involve stakeholders in the development of plans, and to develop an ongoing monitoring process. Goal of Programs The primary goal of cooperative interdistrict integration programs is to create or expand integrated educational opportunities for students in participating schools and school districts. Each program will reflect this primary goal through its objectives and programmatic content. In support of this goal, the districts agree to focus interdistrict integration programs on full -time voluntary integrative student placements in schools. Programs may also include part -time activities provided they are not the focus or central purpose of the program and provided they are designed to prepare for, foster or supplement the desegregation /integration of schools. Program Plans Each program will have a written plan. Each plan will be developed jointly by representatives of the districts participating in the program being developed. - 4 - r 1 The plan for each program at minimum will include these components: a) clear and integrative objectives b) c) d) e) f) g) h) i) j) k) parent information and involvement community awareness and public `information orientation and preparatory teaining.of participating- students and parents other preparation activities description of programs. and type ,of placements available application procedure transportation service staff training timely transfer of student records provision for review or development of learner outcomes and instructional materials 1) complaint resolution procedure for students and parents m) project assessment, including data collection, data analysis, and reporting n) estimated cost and projected revenue source(s), including those for transportation Application Procedure The school districts participating in each program will jointly develop and operate a procedure for applications, admissions and placements of students in the interdistrict integration program. In the interest of families, the procedure will be centralized to the extent feasible, use fair and published criteria, and afford all eligible families timely notice of deadlines °and admissions decisions. The confi'denti`ality of student records will be protected by the procedure. Admissions decisions will be guided by principles of equal opportunity and the goal-of integrated education. Assurances to Partici.patinv Students Once enrolled in a program, students will be entitled to continue in the program until the normal completion point .provided they meet program standards. Students may withdraw from a program; however, normally withdrawals will be effected at the end of a semester. Siblings of enrolled interdistrict students will be afforded priority treatment in admission to the same.program in the same district. - 5,- P Students on wait lists for an interdistrict program will be afforded priority treatment in admissions effected after construction of the wait list. However, wait lists for interdistrict programs will expire upon completion of the school year. Transportation All transportation will be provided through state transportation aids. It will be free of charge to participating students for travel to and from school. Supplementary transportation will be provided such students to allow them to participate fully in after - school activities. Where summer school is offered as part of an interdistrict integration program, student transportation will be provided. Interdistrict integration programs will make reasonable provision for transportation service to interdistrict parents in support of school - related activities such as orientation meetings and parent- teacher conferences. District Support of Interdistrict Integration Participating districts agree to support interdistrict integration through individual district activities including but not limited to the following: a) Recruiting, training and placement of staff of color in instructional and leadership roles in schools for the purpose of assuring staff diversity in all schools but especially in schools having interdistrict students. b) Aggressive implementation of inclusive education. c) Systematic application in participating schools of principles of effective school desegregation /integration. d) Continuous review of the rules and practices of participating schools, and their outcomes, for the purpose of identifying and eliminating any inequities relative to interdistrict students. e) Leadership development programs for principals and site -based teams in participating schools to enhance their ability to provide leadership for integrated schools. f) Activities and programs for students designed to welcome and involve interdistrict students in the life of their schools. g) Recruiting of parents of color and other citizens of color for volunteer roles in schools where there are interdistrict students. Participating districts agree not to engage in nor to condone the following activities relative to interdistrict programs: a) Selective recruiting of students based on athletic ability, academic record, test scores or any other attribute or characteristic which is not demonstrably related to a specific interdistrict educational program. - 6 - b) Exclusion of students from programs based on academic record, test scores, attendance pattern. disciplinary record or similar factors, except to the extent that such factors are relevant to admission criteria set forth in the plan for the interdistrict integration program. c) Removal of students from programs except as provided by established school district policies or written rules and/or rules on removal as set forth in the plan for the program. d) Review of school records of students seeking admission to an interdistrict program except as provided in the admission procedure agreed upon by the participating districts. e) Capping of admissions to a district or to a school at an arbitrary level notwithstanding the availability of space so as to limit the participation level of a racial group. except for the purpose of complying with desegregation requirements set by law, regulation, or the plan for the program. f) Exclusion of grade levels from an interdistrict integration program for any reason other than unavailability of space. g) Exclusion of interdistrict students with special needs unless programs appropriate for such students are not offered to any students, including resident students. h) Discouragement of students from participating in interdistrict integration programs. Approval Each interdistrict integration program shall involve the Minneapolis Public Schools and one or more of these school districts -- Brooklyn Center, Columbia Heights, Edina, Hopkins, Richfield, Robbinsdale, St. Anthony -New Brighton, St. Louis Park. Each program shall be authorized by the boards of education of the districts participating in the program. Administration Responsibility for the administration of each interdistrict integration program shall rest with the districts participating in the program acting through their superintendents or their designees. This body of superintendents shall serve as the administrative body for each program. As the body administering a cooperative venture, the body is expected to function by consensus. In the event a matter requires a vote of the body, the superintendent of each participating suburban school district shall have one vote, and the superintendent of the city district shall have that number of votes equal to the number of suburban school districts participating in the program. - 7 - F n in Interdistrict integration programs are expected to be supported by special state funds, supplemented at times by foundation grants and /or other private- sector contributions. The districts participating in each interdistrict program agree to work cooperatively with the program's fiscal agent in the securing of funds, including but not limited to state appropriations, needed for the programs. Each interdistrict program shall have a fiscal agent which will be one of the districts participating in the program unless other provision is made by the funding source. The fiscal agent shall be accountable for program funds, including their appropriate receipt and disbursement. In addition, the fiscal agent will periodically, or at the request of another participating district, report the status of program funding to the other districts participating in the program. Law All interdistrict integration programs shall conform to federal and state law and regulations. Revised 10/30/91 LAB:nm dot. 2098nm - 8 - .. 1 1 / September 23, 1997 Mr. Glenn L. Smith Mayor, City of Edina 5701 Pentagon Office Park NORMANDALE 7701 Normandale Road, Suite 10l ROAD Minneapolis, MN 55435 ------ - - - - -- MINNESOTA 55424 I am enclosing two resolutions that the Edina School Board passed unanimously last night at its Board meeting. As you will note in the resolutions; there is' strong support to 612/928 -2500 continue discussions on'these -two key items. FAX I made a presentation to the Board last night on the West Metro Education 612/928 -2501 Program(WMEP) and its history and goals.. The presentation also provided information on the three magnet 'schools proposed to be built and run by WMEP With particular attention given to the possibility of the Edina site for the southwest magnet school. This discussion was extensive and included questions from the Board on several components of WMEP and the proposed site and school in Edina. It was a very positive and productive discussion. Jeff Pieters from the: SUN CURRENT was in attendance at this meeting and will probably write about our discussion in next week's paper. Doug Johnson and Ted Suss will work with your staff to develop a land acquisition proposal. I will provide. what support is necessary at the WMEP and state levels. The second resolution speaks to the desire of the School Board to continue discussion of the possibility of relocating the bus garage. There again was good discussion on this topic and a willingness to explore options with the city. Ted and Doug will again work with your staff to develop a firmer proposal for the city and the school district to contemplate. I would be happy to seek to answer any .questions you may have. Please give me a call if I can help in any way. We look forward to continuing the positive dialogue and partnership with the city. Sincerely, Kenneth A. Dragseth, Ph.D. Superintendent of Schools c: Ken Rosland, City Manager Gordon Hughes, Assistant City Manager Eileen Supple, School Board Chair Ted Suss, Director of Business Services Doug Johnson, Director Community Education Services Terry Tofte, Assistant Superintendent WE CARE 7 WE OA RE. o ": ^1E SCARE an equal opportunity employer 234 FOR ACTION INDEPENDENT-SCHOOL DISTRICT 273 Regular Meeting, September 22, 1997 Volume` 69, Report 85 SUBJECT: WEST METRO EDUCATION PROGRAM LAND ACQUISITION Whereas the Edina Public Schools is a member of the West Metro Education Program; and, Whereas the West Metro Education Program, as part of their long -range plan, is planning the operation of a southwest metropolitan magnet elementary school which may be located in Edina; and Whereas the City of Edina has taken ownership of a parcel of property located at Eden Avenue which is an advantageous site for such a magnet school; and Whereas it is the School Board's understanding that the City of Edina considers a magnet school an appropriate use of the land, Be it Resolved, That The Board of Education At the request of the 'Test Metro Education Program of which the Edina Public Schools ISD #273 is a member, formally requests that the City of Edina designates the above- referenced property as a possible magnet school site until such time as the West Metro Education Program and the City of Edina determine that the site is suitable for this use. BACKGROUND INFORMATION The city and the school district, as a member of West Metro Education Program, have had recent discussions relative to the development of this site for a southwest metropolitan magnet school. This resolution indicates an interest on the part of the school district to further pursue the possibility of this location as a site for the southwest magnet school. FOR ACTION INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 273 Regular Meeting, September 22, 1997 Volume 69, Report 86 AMENDED 235 SUBJECT: POTENTIAL BUS GARAGE RELOCATION.. __- -- -. - - -- Be it Resolved, That The Board of Education Request that the City of Edina pursue development of a proposal in cooperation with the school district for the potential relocation of the school district's bus garage and attendant facilities. be the lanel d4:reetly BACKGROUND INFORMATION The size of the potential West Metro Education Program magnet school site may allow space for the relocation of the school district's bus garage and facilities. This potential ought to be investigated prior to the determination of use of the available site south of'the current bus garage. WEST METRO ED PROGRAM Fax'612- 988 -4018 Oct 13. V 15 :14 F.02 Whereas, property has become available at the intersection of Highway 100 and West 50th Street which would be an ideal location for an intexdist�rict magnet school, and cognizant of the difficulties experienced the Downtown School in acquiring its site, and Whereas, The Edina Public Schools have expressed interest in serving as a host district for a proposed southwest interdistrict magnet school, Xow Therefore Be It Rsolva that the representatives of the Edina Public Schools negotiate on behalf of the Nest Metro Education Program for. . the purchase of such property. C Human Resource Directors WE CARE ♦ WE DARE ♦ WE SHARE an equal opportunity employer EXHIBIT XXIV ' , I 6 1997 West Metro Education Program OCT 5701, NORMANDALE ROAD • To: WMEP_Superintendents EDINA ..... From: Terry G. Tofte, Assistant Superintendent for Elementary Educat MINNESOTA Edina Publ, %c: Schools 55424 Subject: Dissemination of Information Regarding RFP for WMEP Southwest School , • Date: October 3,'1997 612/928 -2500 Enclosed please, find a copy of the RFP seeking proposals to provide for research and FAX development of a program model for the Southwest School. The RFP was reviewed by the 612/928 -2501 Steering Committee at our September meeting and proposals submitted will be reviewed by a subcommittee of the Steering Committee in early November. Please pass this information on to your personnel office and feel free to distribute to individuals /organizations you believe might have an interest in the project. We are advertising in several newspapers in the Twin Cities area, sending this information on to professional associations and disseminating. the RFP to organizations representing communities of color. If you have questions or concerns, please call me at 928 -2500 x 4909. Thanks for your support! C Human Resource Directors WE CARE ♦ WE DARE ♦ WE SHARE an equal opportunity employer West Metro Education Program Southwest School Host District: Edina Public Schools Notice of Request for Proposals Research and Development of Program'Model for the Southwest School NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that.,the West Metro. Education_ Program (WMEP)_requests_ proposals to,provide for research and development of;a program model for its Southwest School.: This request for proposal does not obligate WMEP td complete the proposed project and- VINEP . reserves the right to cancel the solicitation if it is considered to be in its best interest. . Purpose To work with WMEP member districts and communities served to develop a design for the Southwest School's education program in a manner responsive to WIVIEP community needs and consistent with best educational practice. Special consideration is to be given to incorporating structures and practices evidencing success in closing the achievement gap among diverse populations of learners. Background The West Metro Education Program (WMEP) is a collaborative of districts committed to voluntary metropolitan school integration. Member districts include Brooklyn Center, Columbia Heights, Edina, Hopkins, Minneapolis, Richfield, Robbinsdale, St. Anthony /New Brighton and St. Louis Park. Minneapolis and Robbinsdale have received Magnet School and Program Grants in past years to support the planning of the WMEP Downtown School, Northwest School and Southwest School. As an element of the development of plans for these three magnet schools, significant linkages have been established between Minneapolis and suburban districts contiguous to its borders. Urban and suburban students have collaborated in a series of educational projects supported by WMEP and staff have benefited from inservice experiences in interdisciplinary program design and multicultural instruction. Beyond this, significant progress has been made in addressing the development of policies and procedures for WMEP schools, including understandings related to employment contracts, relationship with host districts and student admission. The construction of the Downtown School is underway-and significant program`planning has been accomplished for the Northwest School. The need for interdistrict magnet schools had been established through research, study and discussion.' Surveys of parents conducted in connection with the development of magnet programs have-further supported this need. The Minnesota Legislature and Minnesota Board of Education through task force study and proposed rules have further encouraged expansion of efforts toward voluntary metropolitan integration., Goal The goal for this contract is to improve the educational opportunities and academic achievement of learners, promote an integrated education for students and increase mutual understanding. f '+ Objectives The objectives for this contract are: 1. To determine the educational needs of residents in WMEP communities and plan the school's program and related services in a manner consistent with these needs. 2. To review the literature and research related to effective educational programs and practices for diverse learner populations. 3. To visit exemplary sites evidencing success in the application of effective practices and implementation programs successful in addressing the needs of diverse learner populations. 4. To apply what is learned through research and study to the design of the school's educational program- 5. To design a facility which supports the delivery of the school's educational program and related services. Sample Tasks and Outcomes The grantee will provide technical assistance to WMEP as follows: - convene a planning committee representative of WMEP member districts and inclusive of all stakeholders including representation from the communities of color; -survey communities served by WMEP districts to determine educational needs and preferred school models for serving these needs; - provide for the planning group a review of literature and research related to effective educational program and practices for diverse learner populations; - identify and arrange for site visits to schools evidencing success in narrowing the achievement gaps between advantaged and disadvantaged learner populations; -in collaboration with the planning committee, develop and present a design document describing the school's educational program; - outline facilities considerations implicit in the school's design document. Responders may propose additional tasks or activities if they will substantially improve the results of the project. Terms and Conditions Compensation will be for all services performed, unless a specific payment schedule is mutually agreed upon. WMEP will pay for services performed or work delivered after it is accomplished. Payment is only made after the submission of an authorized invoice to the host district. The host district will pay its invoices within 30 days of receipt, unless they are formally contested. Reimbursement for travel expenses actually incurred in performance of the contract are governed by policies and procedures of the host district. Travel outside Minnesota must be approved in advance. No more than 90% of the full amount due under the contract may be paid until the final product(s) of the contract have been reviewed by WMEP. Contract work is to be completed by June '20, 1998. The cost of the contract should not exceed $50,000. Required Elements for the Proposal The following will be considered minimum contents of the proposal: -a statement of the objectives, goals and 'a description of.the tasks to be completed and. products created with attendant timelines and budget; -an outline of the responder's background and experience including examples of similar work done by the responder, a list of personnel who will conduct the project detailing their training, work experience and hourly fees; -a detailed budget aligned to project tasks; and a- delineation of costs- to -WMEP for - completion-of ..this - project-beyond those- outlined. in this, proposal (i.e., travel costs for site visits, released time costs for teachers involved in "the planning, etc.) Proposal Evaluation Proposals will be evaluated by a team representative of WMEP member districts. An interview may be a part of the evaluation process. A 100 -point scale will be used to create the final recommendation The factors and weighting on which proposals will be judged are: - express understanding of project goals 10% - project design and work plan 40 -cost detail 20% - qualifications /experience of personnel working on the project 3007a It is anticipated that the evaluation and selection will be completed by November 15, 1997. Submission of Proposals Prospective responders who have questions regarding this request for proposal may call or write: Terry G. Tofte, Assistant Superintendent Edina Public Schools 5701 Normandale Road Edina, Minnesota 55424 Telephone: 612 -928 -2500 E -Mail: ttofte@edina.k12.mn.us All proposals must be sent to and received by: Rosemary Ruffenach, WMEP Hopkins Public Schools 1001 Highway 7 Hopkins, Minnesota 55305 Three copies of the proposal are to be submitted in sealed envelopes with the responder's name and address written on the outside. Each copy of the proposal must be, signed in ink by the applicant. Prices and terms of the proposal as stated must be valid for the length of the resulting contract All proposals must be received no later that 4:30 p.m., October 31,1997, as indicated by a notation made by the above named individual. Late proposals will not be accepted. Dated:24 September 1997 Y Decision Resources Ltd. MAJOR FINDINGS Methodology: This study contains the results of 'a telephone survey of 2,055 randomly selected households of children attending public schools in the districts comprising the Cooperative Interdistrict Integration Project. These public school districts include the Minneapolis Public Schools, Richfield Public Schools, Edina Public Schools, Saint Louis Park Public Schools, Hopkins Public Schools, Robbinsdale Public Schools, Brooklyn Center Public Schools, Columbia Heights Public Schools, and Saint Anthony -New Brighton Public Schools. Survey responses were gathered by p si terv�In s across these school districts between a 0 1992, and A , The average interview took thirty -one menu es. genera ,•r andom samples suc as this yield results projectable to the entire universe of households containing public school children across the nine school dis- tricts within + 2.2 percentage points in 95 out of 100 cases. Residential Demographics: The average longevity of a household in the nine school districts was 11.3 years. Twenty -five percent had moved into their current school district during the past five years, while nineteen percent had resided there for at least twenty years. The average age of a parent /guardian was 39.6 years old; twenty - three percent were under 35 years old, while twenty -three per- cent were over 44 years old. The average education level was s4QQ.p, n-11ege, although short of college graduation. Seyan vmine percent of the parents /guardians were married nr ;v;ney torret„er, ten percent were single and twelve percent were divorced or widowed. Of those married or living together, seventy -four percent reported both partners worked outside of the home. Ethnically, seventy -nine nergent ^-F tl,o camnl P wPx:p w„bite, fif- teen percent were black, three percent were American Indian and Asian, respectively, and one percent were Hispanic. Fifty -seven percent of the respondents were female, while forty -three percent were male. The median grade level of the youngest school -aged child was fqgrth grade. Tw.=:W-two percent of the households reported the presence of a �rP- crthnnlPF SixZ;6z ^ercent contained chil- dren in KlmcLegaarten through sixth grades, thirty -five percent had children in grades seven through nine, while twenty -nine percent reported children in tenth through twelfth grades. 3128 Dean Court • Minneapolis, �V innesota 35416 • (612) 920 -0337 • Fax(612)929-6166 The Quality of Public Schools: The quality of the public schools in their school district played either "a major role" or wa "mart- ..imprtant ll or 1 ty- seven ercent in the selection of their decision to locate. It was a minor concern or played "no role at a or orty -three percent. Minneapolis schools and suburban schools were rated rela- tively evenly by residents of the nine city - suburban school districts. Both districts were also ranked higher than schools nationally. su >r = schools were awarded an average grade of ""B" by parents /guardians across the nine school districts. The quality of the educational process, cgrnAtnn hers, and,.aood schools motivated ratings; the perception that the schools could improve motivated most marginal and negative rat- ings. Minneapolis Public Schools were awarded an average grade of "R-" b Ai6',* ate group of respondents. Competent teachers, small class sizes, and perceived improvements were the basis for positive ratings; social problems, crime, and room for improve- ment motivated most lower rankings. Minneapolis and suburban public schools were ranked higher than public schools nationally: the average grade awarded to schools nationally was a "C." Changes in the quality of schools during the last five years in both Minneapolis and the suburbs were assessed. While a thirty -eight percent plurality felt that Minneapolis Public Schools had "remained about the same," relatively equal numbers, - twenty -five percent and twenty -three percent, respectively, felt they had either "improved" or "gotten worse" during the past five years. In comparison, a plume tv '-,f r._ c- six percent felt that suburban public schools had "st-a -ed al^n »t the same" dur time mgxj od. Twe tv -seven percent felt that suburban schools had "iiqRLoved," while thirtegn narrcnt thought they had "gotten worse." A majority fifty -nine percent _ thought the duality of subUKhan crhnnl Hi ct ri ct`s- i impacted the City of M' n'eapolis. Of those, thirty -eight percent viewed competition as good for both school systems. Twenty -five percent were concerned about fami- lies and children leaving the Minneapolis Public Schools if the differences became too profound. Fifty -four percent of the sample also felt that if the Minneapolis Public Schools improved during the next five years, it would result in a positive impact on the suburbs. Conversely, fifty -one p er_cent also felt that if the Minneapolis Public Schools were o worsen r>>riz -1 t� hat period of time, a nPagti-a impact on the sub rbs would result. Answers were primarily based on The imp ications change wou d have on population movements, as well as the overall impact on the Metro- politan Area. 2 I'%� The Value of Diversity: seventy-six was "very immortan for students to understand society and history from different social, economic, and cultural viewpoints. Nineteen percent regarded it as "somewhat important." In fact, sixty -five percent thought children were better off attending schools have very different ethnic, social, and economic backgrounds than attending schools where these factors were similar. Only sixteen percent chose the opposite point of view. The key virtues of schools containing heterogeneity were deemed to be the better understanding of diversity and the more accurate reflection of society. Schools Close to Home: Parents /guardians generally repardpd ±-* attending schools close to home a-- ;a,�, sb " t For elementary school children, regarded it as "very important;" that rating five percent for junior high or middle school ty -four percent for high school students. An minutes maximum transportation time from home established as qualifying as "close to home." Program Choice vs. School Choice: Respondents indicated, by a fifty -three nine percent verdict, they would pre gZ. prog r+n were posed. Residents s ability felt programs be made with the needs regarded schools as mo regardless of offering at all schools. were more critical and of the child. Adults re critical, preferred s, or thought programs Parents /guardians were asked if there tional program their school district could motivate them to send their youngest child programs, ar." individualized from three to iTnQQgtnnnP of +-), the Ae of seventy -six percent dropped to thirty - students and twen- average 11.8 to a school was percent to twenty - nnmp A "ticular 1, if that option ecision- making a better fit could selecting the latter nearer schools should be the same were a type of educa- offer which would programs, and gifted programs seven percent of the sample. Anguage programs, ested by When respondents were asked about specific programs which their school district could offer, they established a clear hierarchy. Fifty -six percent were "very likely" to sPnri their child to g schnn' 1where cmmnuterc AncA nther high technology are used extensively by Judents and teachers," while fifty -one percent felt similarly a ou a ac to basics' traditional school that concentrates on skills, such as reading, writing, and mathematics." Forty -four percent were "very likely" to send their youngest child to an in- district school offering "a program 3 4' X with a mathematics and science emphasis." These three programs, then, garnered unusually large levels of interest. More m9derate levels of appeal were i nd i mated fnr the re- maining choices. Thirty -seven percent felt similar about schools "offee -! —asp alternative program where students become proficient in a foreign language while learning the basic curriculum" and "in which children learn at their own rate moving through their lessons as quickly as they are able." Thirty -one percent were "very likely" to send their youngest child to a school "offering extensive programs in the fine arts." A school offering "day care for students before and after school, on school district holidays, and during the summer" drew twenty -nine percent, while a "year -round school" was favored by twenty -two percent. Sixteen percent were favorably disposed to a school "offering flexible hours to meet individual family schedules," while eleven percent liked a school "near their place of work." Voluntary De- Segregation: The major benefits of a voluntary de- segregation plan were felt to be the fostpowing aZ d i -a � *-T = - t -ioned by t -nine percent; equality of education, cited by ten percent; more i er- action betty s u en s of varied backgrounds, stated by eight percent; and greater choices, pointed to by six percent. -Eight- een percent, though,.saw no benefits from a voluntary de- segre a i The mayor negatives were felt to be the poten- tiai of amilies leaving the area, mentioned by thirty -two per- cent; the potential for trouble in the schools, stated by twelve percent; and the difficulty of some students fitting into their new school environment, raised by nine percent. Nine percent also felt there were no major negatives accompanying a voluntary de- segregation plan. venty -ei children of color from Min- neapolis urban school districts; only twelve percent were opposed. Supporters pointed to the benefits of greater d� ;y, the lack with this approach, and the nAPH fnr mare Qt,n;Qes. Opponents f eTF that local schools were best for children, were concerned about travel times, and felt their schools were already diverse. Seventy -one percent of the sample also favored white children from suburban school districts attending the Minneapolis Public Schools; eight- een percent were opposed. The reasoning of both supporters and opponents paralleled the answers to the previous question. Participation in a Voluntary Program: Parents /guardians were asked specifically about sending their youngest child across district lines to a Minneapolis Public Schools facility, if they were suburban residents, or to a suburban public school, if they were Minneapolis residents. A core of thirteen percent of the respondents indicated they would be "very likely" to do Gn. In addition, twenty -seven percent ey.would be "somewhat likely" t to a city or suburban interest was of ere Fifty -ss- r,pnt r nnr•rPr3 t bby- w r i ther "very unlikely" or " somewhat unlikely "'to 2artininate. The key to participation was found to be the specifics of the program in the other school district;. in fact, math - science, computers, foreign languages, "back -to- basics," and fine arts programs were men - tioned as having great appeal. When quizzed about specific programs -which Minneapolis _ Public Schools could .offer _suburban _ childr.en- and -- vice -- versa -,- - -- - preferences generally followed the same order as, those sought within each school district.. Twenty -fnirr ^f, *SP- parents were "very. likely" to Send t-boi r` Vn�i�PCt chi 1'i� O a� "56 1001 where computers,,-:and other h'ah technoTocfv are' used extensively by students and Bache rrs," while twenty. percent felt similarly about "a.back -to- basics" traditional school that concentrates on skills, suc as reading, writing, and mathematics." Between eighteen and sixteen percent of.the parents expressed a great deal of interest in "a school offering .a program with a mathemat- ics and science emphasis," "a school offering extensive programs in the fine arts, such as music, art, and drama," A school offer- ing an alternative program where students become proficient in a foreign language while learning the basic curriculum," and "a school in which children learn at their own rate moving through their lessons as quickly as they are able." Fewer parents /guard- ians.expressed keen interest in "a school offering day care for students," "a school offering flexible hours to meet individual family schedules," or "a school near their place of work." Conclusions: The following conclusions follow from the assembled data: 1. There are a substantial number of households in the nine school districts that would be willing to participate in a volun- tary de- searectation effort. 2. The key marketing theme for such an effort should be based on the concept of fostering diversity in the public schools.., 3. Pilot programs should offer coursework concentrating on: (A) computers. and other high technology; .(B) "back -to- basics" itional approaches; and (C) mathematics and science emphasis. 4. Ideally, efforts should be concentrated at middle school gr . With a sustained general marketing effort, a voluntary desegre- gation effort linking Minneapolis and the inner ring suburban school districts would have an eminent likelihood for success. 5 41.- What do you consider to be the major negatives of a volun- tary de- segregation.plan involving Minneapolis and suburban public schools? NO ANSWER, 11 %; NONE,-7%; TROUBLE, 14 %; FAMILIES LEAVE AREA, 34 %; QUALITY DIFFERENCES, 2 %; CROWDING, 2 %; HURT EDUCATION, 6 %; FORCE CHILDREN, COST, 4 %; FITTING IN, 11 %; WON'T WORK, 4 %; SMALL NUMBERS IF.VOLUNTARY, 4 %. 42. Would.you favor or oppose children of color from-Minneapolis attend- ing your School District? (WAIT FOR RESPONSE) Do you feel strongly ---that-way?------ _ -- -- - - - - - - -- Y - - - IF ANSWER IS GIVEN, ASK: STRONGLY FAVOR........ 42% FAVOR...... ......41% C, OPPOSE..... 5 %� G STRONGLY OPPOSE ......... 3% DON'T KNOW /REFU9ED.....9% 43. Could you tell me.one or two reasons you feel that way? NO ANSWER, 3 %; LOCAL_- BEST`,--%;; BETTER EDUCATION, 12 %; GOOD IDEA, 12 %, VERSITY, 3 ;'NO PROBLEM,-9%; GOOD FOR MINNEAPOLIS, 5 %; CRIME, 2 %; TRAVEL TIME, 3 %; TOO CROWDED, 1 %; ONLY IF VOLUNTARY, 5 %, NEED CHOICES, 3 %. 44. Would you favor of oppose white. STRONGLY FAVOR...... 26% interest to your youngest school -aged children from y h district FAVOR .................44% attending MnneapolisPublic OPPOSE .................9 % Schools? (WAIT FOR RESPONSE) Do STRONGLY OPPOSE........ 10% you feel strongly that way? DON'T KNOW /REFUSED.... 11% for that program, -- very likely, IF ANSWER IS GIVEN, ASK: 45. Could you tell me one or two reasons you feel that way? NO ANSWER, 2 %; LOCAL BEST, 5 %; IF VOLUNTARY, 24 %; SUBURBS ARE BETTER, 5 %; DIVERSITY, 19. %; PARENTS' CHOICE, 6% ;-PROBLEMS, 4 %; INCREASE OPTIONS, 9 %; TRAVEL TIME, 6 %; NO PROBLEMS, 4 %, BETTER FOR ALL, 3 %. Suppose the Minneapolis:Public Schools offered a program of interest to your youngest school -aged child.... 46. How likely would'..you,be to send VERY LIKELY ......... ...6% �G�C�� your youngest school -aged child SOMEWHAT LIKELY....... 24% to a Minneapolis Public School SOMEWHAT UNLIKELY..... 19% ��ZU for that program, -- very likely, VERY UNLIKELY ......... 48% somewhat likely, somewhat unlike- DON'T KNOW /REFUSED..... 3% ly, or very unlikely? REGARDLESS.OF ANSWER, ASK: 7 10 /OL /97 WED 1.3:07 FAX 6123384840 SEITER LEACH AND LINDSTR PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE Elementary School (K-6) with Common Areas 600 Students -Building 85,000 sf x $901sf Site Development Subtotal Inflation to Bid (0.05) Subtotal Architect's Fee Architects Reimbursables Survey/Soil Exploration Other Fees (Permits, Plan Check, etc.) Subtotal Contingency Furnishings Technology Total 4. 9 001 625,000 40,000 7,000 5.000 $9,009,000 500,000 580,000 900.000 $10,989,000 Post4t° brand fax transmittal memo 7b71 x pages 0006 JohNsoN rram wN wluvf Co-ca1 . am— SEW peps- . anone��L2� 1 GJt�?.FJ 7 Fax 4 -la -u4Q i _ FISM 3a3�-s'tg� I / EOINq PUBLIC SCHOOLS District Media and Technologv Services Edina Public Schools 5701 Normandale Road Edina. MN 55424 -1541 (612) 928 -2580 (612) 928 -2581 FAX DATE: October 6, 1997 TO: Doug Johnson, Director of Community Educational Services FROM: Michael A. Burke, Ph.D., Director of Media and Technology Services COPY: Dr. Ken Dragseth, Superintendent Dr. Terry Tofte, Assistant Supt. of Elementary Education RE: Cost of technology for new elementary schools ASSUMPTIONS: 85,000 sq. ft. 32 classrooms 600 students • Fiber optic cabling and twisted pair phone line $16,000 • Electrical outlets and dedicated power to each classroom $24,000 for 5 computers, one printer, overhead projector, and TV • Local area computer network Ethernet hardware, file $171,000 server, and 100 /10 base T switches • 32 laptop /workstations for teachers $70,400 • 120 student workstations $216,000 • Printers $12,900 • Software programs for server and workstations $30,400 • Mini -lab for library and laptops for student projects $60,000 • Interactive distance learning classroom $35,000 • AMX television distribution system cable, TV, and $150,000 controllers • Telephone system and intelligent phones $62,245 • Misc. multimedia equipment CD -ROM, overhead $32,000 projectors, video /computer projector TOTAL COST: $879,945 WE CARE ♦ WE DARE ♦ WE SHARE c :lamiotldmuiadmmidj/06.doc an equal 0000rruayemoloyer a�- Soo LINE K.K. co., ErIE 5 ITI MY IN I I ZMATI IAN G� I F�E 7"�7 v�wu :uN�V I V �Iyj1Nc� PARK rn r� 0 Fri .... FAH.. ._.. IOM EDINA BUS GARAGE I, NSF: I 27,000. Comm. No'.:2005.001.01 -1 UNIT SECT !DESCRIPTION QUANT. UT COST TOTAL . 1000 GENERAL CONDITIONS 5.00.% LS 3.85 $104,070 2 EARTHWORK 27,000- SF 5.00 $135,000 2 SITE UTILITIES 1 LS 35,000 $35,000 2 LANDSCAPING 1 LS 0.00 $0 2 HEAVY -DUTY ASPHALT 63,900 SF 1:10 $70,290 3 ICURB &,- GUTTER 1,680 LF.- 8.50 514,280_ 3 RETAINING WALL'FOOTING 116 CY 190.00 $21,956 3 TRENCH.CONCRE T E 240 LF 55.00 $ 13,200 3 STRIP`FOOTINGS 530 LF 20.00 $10,600, 3 RETAINING WALL .226. Cy 37.5.00 $84,867 3 'FOUNDATION:WALL 530 LF 54.00. $28,620 3 SLAB ON GRADE 25,000 SF 3.50 $87,500 3 SLAB ON GRADE „4" 2,000 SF 2.75 $5,500 3 PRECAST STRUCTUREW /PLANK 27,000 SF 15.00 $405,000° 4 CMU EXTERIOR 12,300 SF 12.00 $147,600 4 CMU PARAPET 410 LF 52.50 $21,525 5 TRENCH GRATING 240 LF 70.00 $16,800' 5 STRUCTURAL STEEL 27,000 SF 5.00 $135,000.. 5 MISC METALS 27,000- SF 1.00 $27,000 6 CASEWORK 24 LF 125.00 $.3,000 7 FURR, INSULATE, GYP OFF. PERIM 21184 SF 2.50 $5,460 7 R -20 INSUL. BENEATH PRECAST 25,000 SF 2.50 $62,500 7 WATERPROOFING 25.,000 SF 3.00 $75,000 7 ROOFING .2,000 SF 8.00 $16,000 8 HM DOORS 10 EA 1,200.00 $ 12,000 8 IHM WINDOWS 48 SF 30.00 $1;440 8 GARAGE DOORS 11 EA 4,148.00 $45,628 9 SHEETROCK PARTITIONS 250 LF 36.00 $9,000 9 PAINTING 1 LS 20,000.00 $20,000 9 VCT FLOORS 1,500 SF 1.50 $2,250 9 JCERAMIC FLOOR TILE 500 SF 8.00 $4,000 9 CERAMIC WALL TILE 1,200 SF 8.00, $9,600 9 ACOUSTIC CEILING TILE 1,500 SF 1.75 $2,625 9 SHEETROCK CEILING 500 SF. 4.00 $2.000. 10 TOILET ACCESSORIES 14 EA 275.00 $3,850 10 TOILET PARTITIONS 6 EA 750.00 $4;500 10 ILOCKER 40' ':EA 120.00 $4,800 10 LOCKER BENCHES 16 LF 30.00 5480 11 LUBE RACK 1 EA 9,000.00 $9,000 15 FLOOR DRAINS 18 EA 350.00 $6;300 15 FLOOR DRAIN PIPING 510 LF 22.00 $11;220 15 PLUMBING FIXTURES 18 EA 2,000.00 $36,000 15 ROOF�DRAINAGE '27,000 SF 1.00 $27,000 15 HVAC FOR OFFICE 2,000 SF 15.00 $30,000 15, HVAC FOR GARAGE - 25,000 SF 7.00 $175,000 1 ELECTRICAL 27;000' SF 8.00 $216,000 $0 SUMMARY- PARK ON TOP 9 -19 -97 Sheet 1, of 2 9/22:'97 8:13 AM ain EDINA BUS GARAGE NSF: 27,000 Comm. No.:2005.001.01 -1 F I UNIT SECT DESCRIPTION QUANT. UT COST TOTAL Sub -Total — $2,185,460 Bond 1.50% $32,782 Margin 5.00% $110,912 EstimatedTotai 86.26 $2,329,154 CONTINGENCY 10% 1 1 $232,915 Construction Budget 94.89 $2,562,069 NOT INCLUDED IN ABOVE: 15 5000 GAL. UG FUEL TANK 1 EA 10,000.00 $10,000 15 PRODUCT DISPENSERS 2 EA 16,500.00 $33,000 Sub -Total $43,000 Bond 1.50% $645 Margin 5.00% $2,182 EstimatedTotal 1.70 $45,827 CONTINGENCY 10% $4,583 Construction Budget 1.87 $50,410 I SUMMARY- PARK ON TOP 9 -19 -97 Sheet 2 of 2 9/22197 8:13 AM We offer the following calculations on available documentation: Existing Bus Garage Site 77,500 sf ± Existing Bus Garage Coverage 25,675 sf ± Building/Site Coverage 33% New Bus Garage Coverage 29,000 sf ± New Bus Garage Site Equivalent 79,000 sf ± New Building/Site Coverage 36% New School Site 366,138 sf ± Garage Site/School Site Ratio 21