HomeMy WebLinkAbout1997-12-15_COUNCIL PACKET�9tr1A,I�
�1
o e
0
o•
RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT
FOR THE COVENTRY AT CENTENNIAL LAKES 8TH ADDITION
City of Edina,
BE_ IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that
certain plat entitled, "THE COVENTRY AT CENTENNIAL LAKES 8th ADDITION ", platted
by Centennial Land Partnership, a Minnesota limited partnership, an undivided 91.43%
interest, and John W. Hedberg, an undivided 8.57% interest, and the Housing and
Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota, a public body corporate and politic under
the laws of the State of Minnesota, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council
on December 15, 1997, be and is hereby granted final plat approval.
Adopted this 15th day of December, 1997.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby
certify that the attached and foregoing City Council Minutes is a true and correct copy of the
Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of December 15,
1997, and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting.
WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this 18th day of March, 1998.
Debra A. Mangen, City erk
City Hall (612) 927 -8861
4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 927 -7645
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 927 -5461
AGENDA
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
DECEMBER 15,1997
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL
ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the
Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda
items marked with an asterisk ( *) in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered
routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items
unless a Commissioner, Council Member or citizen so requests it In such cases the item will be
removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the Agenda.
I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of HRA - Meeting of December 1, 1997
Rollcall II. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS as per pre -list dated 12/11/97 TOTAL: $61,646.11
III. ADJOURNMENT
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
I. REPORT FROM CONSULTANTS - Recommendations /Sanitary and Storm Sewer Systems
* II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of December 1, 1997 and Special Meeting
of December 3,1997.
III. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS - Affidavits of Notice by
Clerk. Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. Zonin
Ordinances: First and Second Reading require 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of
Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall of all members of
Council to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District:
3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. Conditional Use Permit: 3/5 favorable rollcall
vote required to pass.
Rollcall A. Final Plat, The Coventry at Centennial Lakes 81h Addition, Laukka Jarvis Inc.
IV. ORDINANCES First Reading: Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second Reading: 3/5
favorable rollcall vote of all Council members to pass. Zoning Ordinances: First and Second
Readings require 4/5 favorable rollcall of all Council members to pass. Waiver of Second
Readm : 4/5 favorable rollcall of all Council members to pass.
Rollcall A. First Reading, Ordinance No. 1997 -18, amending Section 1305 Scavengers and Section
185 Fees and Charges.
V. AWARD OF BID
A. Tandem Asphalt Roller, Public Works
B. Tree Trimming Contract Improvement TT-98
C. 4 Wheel Drive Tractor with attachments, 501h & France
Agenda/Edina City Council
December 15,1997
Page 2
VI. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS
A. Traffic Safety Report of December 2,1997
Rollcall B. Resolution, Special Legislation/ Public Safety Training Center Facility
Rollcall C. Resolution approving SHeRPA Joint Powers Agreement and Family Services
Collaborative Agreement
D. Set Date for Council Annual Meeting with Boards, Commissions and Committees
VII. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS
VIII. CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
DC. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES
X. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL
XI. MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEM
XII. FINANCE
Rollcall A. Second Reading Ordinance No. 1997 -16 Amending Code Section 185 to Increase
Certain Fees.
Rollcall B. Resolution - Park and Recreation Fees - Green Fees at City Golf Courses
Rollcall C. Resolution - Adopting 1998 General Operating Budget and Setting 1998 Property Tax
Levy
Rollcall D. Payment of Claims as per Pre -List Dated 12/11/97 TOTAL: $763,748.79 and for
Confirmation of Payment of Claims as per Pre -List Dated 12/2/97 TOTAL: $622,267.76
SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS
Wed
Dec 24
CHRISTMAS EVE DAY - City Hall closes at noon
Thur
Dec 25
CHRISTMAS DAY - City Hall Closed
Mon
Dec. 29
Year End Meeting 5:00 P.M. MANAGER'S CONF. RM
Wed
Dec 31
NEW YEAR'S EVE DAY - City Hall Closes at noon
Thur
Jan 1
NEW YEAR'S DAY - City Hall Closed
Mon
Jan 5
Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Mon
Jan 19
MARTIN LUTHER KING DAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed
Tues
Jan 20
Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Mon
Feb 2
Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Mon
Feb 16
PRESIDENTS DAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed
Tues
Feb 17
Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
• ,�CORPOMT�O
RESOLUTION
APPROVING SPECIAL LEGISLATION
City of Edina
WHEREAS, the Cities of Bloomington, Chanhassen, Eden Prairie, Edina and Richfield are
desirous of constructing a Public Safety Training Facility within the corporate limits of the City
of Edina, and
WHEREAS, the aforementioned cities did request special the Minnesota legislature to grant
them the authority to sell bonds to finance the proposed Public Safety Training Facility; and
WHEREAS, the Minnesota legislature did enact special legislation via House File 1909 and
Senate File 1720 granting the cities of Bloomington, Chanhassen, Eden Prairie, Edina, and
Richfield the authority to issue general obligation bonds of each city in an amount not to exceed
$1,000,000 for its share of the cost of the acquisition, construction, and equipping of a public
safety training facility to be jointly operated by a joint powers association consisting of two or
more municipal or public corporations of which Edina is a member.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Edina City Council that the special legislation is
hereby approved.
Passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, this 15th day of December, 1997.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify
that the attached and foregoing City Council Minutes is a true and correct copy of the
Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of December 15, 1997,
and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting.
WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this 18th day of December, 1997
�" a
Debra A. Mang n, Ci lerk
City Hall (612) 927 -8861
4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 927 -7645
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 927 -5461
Sec. of State Elect. F- x:612- 296 -9073 _ Dec 2 '97 13:13 P. 02/03
CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL OF SPECIAL LAW
BY GOVERNING BODY
(Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, 645.02 and 645.021)
STATE OF MINNESOTA
County of Hennepin
TO THE SECRETARY OF STATE OF MINNESOTA:
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, That the undersigned chief clerical officer of the
City of Edina
DOES HEREBY CERTIFY, that in compliance with the provisions of Laws, 19 97 . Chapter 645
requiring approval by a majority' vote of the governing body of said local governmental unit before it
becomes effective, the Edina City Council
(designate governing body)
at a meeting duly held on the 15th day of Dec. 19 97 . by resolution
did approve said Laws, 19 97 . Chapter 645
(f other than resolution, specify)
by a s i mp 1 e majority vote' of all of the members thereof (Ayes 5 ; Noes o
Absent or not voting o j and the following additional steps, if any, required by statute or charter were
taken:
A copy of the resolution is hereto annexed and made a part of this certific a by
Signed:
SEAL Kenneth E. Rosia d
City Manager
(Official designation of officer)
(This form prescribed by the Attorney General and furnished by the Secretary of State as
required in Minnesota Statutes 645.021)
'If extraordinary majority is required by the special law, insert fraction or percentage here.
Please see teverside side for instructions for completing this form.
cWMuth.faw Rev. 6(93
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
HELD AT'CITY HALL
DECEMBER 1, 1997 - 7:00 P.M. .
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Faust,, Hovland, Maetzold and' Mayor. Smith.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Faust and seconded by
Member Maetzold to approve and adopt the Consent Agenda as presented with the exception
of Agenda Items III.A. 1998 Bloomington Public Health Nursing Contract,, IV. A. Reinstatement
of Chico's Taco's Wine and 3.2 Beer License 'and IV.B. D'Amico & Sons New Wine and 3.2 - --
Beer License.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Maetzold, Smith
Motion carried.
*MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF NOVEMBER 17, 1997. APPROVED Motion made by
Member Faust and seconded by Member Maetzold approving the Minutes of the Regular
Meeting of November 17, 1997.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four'ayes.
ORDINANCE NO. 1997 -14 ADOPTED, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CODE SECTION 1230 AND
900 AND MODIFYING CITY POLICY REGARDING THE CONSUMPTION OF 3.2% MALT LIQUOR
AT CERTAIN CITY PARKS AND FACILITIES Assistant Manager Hughes reminded Council that at
their November 17, 1997, - meeting,, First Reading was granted to Ordinance No. 1997 -14. He added
staff now recommends Second Reading.
Member Maetzold introduced the following Ordinance and moved its approval:
ORDINANCE NO. 1997 -14
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 1230 AND
SECTION 900 OF THE CITY CODE TO PERMIT THE
CONSUMPTION OF INTOXICATING MALT LIQUOR IN CERTAIN
PARK FACILITIES AND TO PERMIT THE SALE OF
NON - INTOXICATING MALT LIQUOR ON CITY GOLF COURSES
AND TO CHANGE THE TERMINOLOGY OF
NON- INTOXICATING MALT LIQUOR
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS:
Section 1. Subparagraph 1 of paragraph O of Subsection 1230.02 of the City Code is
amen_ ded to read as follows:
"1. 3.2 percent malt liquor, intoxicating malt liquor and wine .which is dispensed by
the City or by an authorized agent of the City may be consumed subject to other
applicable provisions of this Code and subject to the rules and regulations of the Park
Director pursuant to Subsection 1230.06 in the - following places:
a) Inside the clubhouse building or on decks, patios and other outdoor dining
areas which are adjacent to the clubhouse building at. Braemar Golf Course
and at Fred Richards Golf Course.
b) Inside the Edinborough Park building, the Centennial Lakes Park Centrum
building, the building at Arneson Acres Park, the Edina Art Center Building
and on decks, patios and other outdoor dining areas which are adjacent. to
such buildings."
Pagel
Minutes /Edina City Council /December 1, 1997
Section 2. Paragraph O of Subsection 1230.02 of the City Code is amended by
adding a new subparagraph 2 as follows:
92. 3.2 percent malt liquor, which is dispensed by the City or by an agent of the City
pursuant to a temporary on -sale 3.2 percent malt liquor license issued in accordance
with Section 900 of this Code may be consumed subject to other applicable provisions
of this Code and subject to the rules and regulations of the Park Director pursuant to
Subsection 1230.06 within the confines of the ball field complex at Van Valkenburg
Park."
Section 3. Paragraph 0 -of Subsection 1230.02 of the City Code is amended by
adding a new subparagraph 3 as follows:
"3. 3.2 percent malt liquor which is dispensed by the City or by an agenda of the
City pursuant to a 3.2 malt liquor license issued in accordance with Section 900 of the
City Code may be consumed subject to other applicable provisions of -this Code and
subject to the rules and regulations of the Park Director pursuant to Subsection
1230.06 on the ground of Braemar Golf Course and Fred Richards Golf Course."
Section 4. Subparagraph 2 of Paragraph 0 of Subsection 1230.02 is re- numbered
Subparagraph 4.
Section 5. Subsection 900.13 of the City Code is amended to read as follows:
"900.13 Special Licensing Requirements. In addition to the requirements imposed
by Subsection 900.06, 3.2 percent malt liquor.licenses shall be issued only to (i) private
clubs which have been incorporated for more than 5en years and which own and
operate club houses for their members in which the serving of such liquor is incidental
to and not the major purpose of such club, (ii) restaurants, (iii) golf courses, (iv) the
Edina Golf Dome, (v) bowling centers and (vi) hotels as defined in M.S. 340A."
Section 6. Subsection 900.14 of the City Code is amended to read as follows:
"900.14. Place of Serving and Consumption. 3.2 percent malt liquor sold pursuant
to a 3.2 percent malt liquor' license shall be. served and consumed at tables in the
dining or refreshment room on the licensed premises and shall not be consumed or
served at bars; provided, . the same may be consumed or served at the following
locations:
A: At counters where food is regularly served and consumed.
B. On decks, patios and other outdoor dining areas which are adjacent to the
licensed premises.
C. On the grounds of a golf course.
Section 7. The City Code is amended by replacing all references to "non- intoxicating
malt liquor" with "3.2 percent malt liquor."
Section 8.' This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon passage and
publication.
Attest
City Clerk Mayor
Member Faust seconded the motion.
Rollcail:
Ayes' Faust, Hovland, Smith
Nay: Maetzold .
Page 2
Minutes /Edina City Council /December 1, 1997
Ordinance adopted.
ORDINANCE NO 1997 -17 ADOPTED AN ORDINANCE REPEALING EDINA CODE SECTION
1325 AND REPLACING IT WITH NEW SECTION 1326 REGULATING THE SALE AND USE OF
TOBACCO PRODUCTS Sanitarian Velde reviewed and responded to the issues raised when Council
granted first reading to the tobacco ordinance.
1. Include a synthetic tobacco product in the definitions:
• No such product exists in the market at this time
• Difficult to define
• Development of such a product would require FDA approval
• The ordinance could be amended when such a product is developed
2. Increase the licensee's third offense penalty from $250.00 to $400.00 and add a fourth
offense penalty:
• Third offense penalty increased to $400 plus 7 day license suspension
• Fourth offense penalty will be $500 plus license revocation
• All offenses would need to occur within a twenty -four month period
3. Increase the penalty fee for minors who violate the ordinance
• Penalty fee for minors increased to $75 per offense, or
• Penalty of $25 per offense plus successful completion of a diversion program, or
• Prosecution as a misdemeanor
Sanitarian Velde added staff has met with community members and are looking at alternative
penalties program.
Council briefly discussed the proposed penalties for minors. They questioned who determined
whether the minor paid the $75 fine, or the $25 fine plus entered a diversion program. Mayor Smith
moved amending the proposed Ordinance by adding "as determined by the hearing officer."
to Subd 3, of Section 1326.08 Penalties. Member Hovland seconded the motion.
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Maetzold, Smith
Motion carried.
Council discussed the handling of juvenile offenders. It was noted that juvenile offenders would have
the choice of venue either to be heard by a local hearing officer or through the court system.
Sanitarian Velde explained that state law is currently being modified and at this time is unclear. Police
Chief Bernhjelm noted the City has approximately 100 offenses each year of minors in possession of
tobacco.
Mayor Smith made a motion removing the amendment to the proposed Ordinance. Member
Hovland seconded the motion.
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Maetzold, Smith
Motion carried.
A brief discussion ensued regarding establishing a City Court system to handle cases of local
jurisdiction. Staff explained this option is under investigation and a report will be presented to Council
soon on the status of the issue.
Member Maetzold introduced the following Ordinance and moved its approval:
ORDINANCE NO. 1997-17
AN ORDINANCE REPEALING SECTION 1325
OF THE CITY CODE AND REPLACING IT WITH
A NEW SECTION 1326 FOR THE PURPOSE OF
REGULATING THE SALE AND USE OF TOBACCO PRODUCTS
Page 3
Minutes /Edina City Council /December 1. 1997
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS:
Section 1. Section 1325 of the City Code is repealed in its entirety.
Section 2. The City Code is amended by adding a new Section 1326 as follows:
SECTION 1326 - Sale of Tobacco; Licensing
1326.01 Definitions. Unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, the following terms
have the meanings given them in this Subsection:
Tobacco or Tobacco Related Product shall mean any substance or item containing
tobacco leaf, including but not limited to cigarettes, cigars, pipe tobacco; snuff; fine
cut or other chewing tobacco; cheroots; stogies; perique; granulated, plug cut, crimp
cut, ready- rubbed and other smoking tobacco; snuff flowers; cavendish; shorts; plug
and twist tobaccos; dipping tobaccos; refuse scraps, clippings, cutting and sweepings
of tobacco; and other kinds and forms of tobacco leaf prepared in such manner as to
be suitable for chewing, sniffing, or smoking.
Tobacco Related Device shall mean any tobacco product as well as a pipe, rolling
papers, or other device intentionally designed or intended to be used in a manner
which enables the chewing, sniffing, or smoking of tobacco or tobacco related
products.
Self- Service Merchandising shall mean the open displays of tobacco or tobacco related
products, or tobacco related devices in any manner where any person shall have
access to the tobacco or tobacco related products, or tobacco related devices, without
the assistance or intervention of the licensee or the licensee's employee.
Moveable Place of Business shall mean any form of business operated out of a truck,
van, automobile, or other type of vehicle or transportable shelter and not a fixed
address store front or other permanent type of structure authorized for sales
transactions.
Minor shall mean any natural person who has not yet reached the age of eighteen (18)
years.
Retail Sale shall mean any transfer of goods for money, trade, barter, or other
consideration.
Vending Machine shall mean any mechanical, electric or electronic, or other type of
device which dispenses tobacco or tobacco related products, or tobacco related
devices upon the insertion of money, tokens, or other form of payment directly into the
machine by the person seeking to purchase the tobacco or tobacco related product, or
tobacco related devices.
Compliance Checks shall mean the system the City of Edina uses to investigate and
ensure that those authorized to sell tobacco or tobacco related products, and tobacco
related devices are following and complying with the requirements of this Section.
Compliance Checks shall mean the use of minors who attempt to purchase tobacco or
tobacco related products, or tobacco related devices for education, research and
training purposes as authorized by State and Federal laws. Compliance checks may
also be conducted by other units of government for the purpose of enforcing
appropriate Federal, State or local laws and regulations relating to tobacco or tobacco
related products, and tobacco related devices.
1326.02 License Required. No person shall keep tobacco or tobacco related products, or
tobacco related devices for retail sale_ or sell tobacco or tobacco related products, or tobacco
Page 4
Minutes /Edina City Council /December 1. 1997
related devices at retail in the City without first obtaining a license from the City. No license
shall be issued for the sale of tobacco or tobacco related products, or tobacco related devices
at a movable place of business or from a vending machine. "
1326.03 License Procedure. The provisions of Section 160 of this Code shall apply to all
licenses required by this Section and to the holders of such .licenses, except that licenses
shall be issued or denied by the Sanitarian. The applications for a license shall be on forms
provided by the Sanitarian and shall be accompanied by the fee set forth in Section 185 of this
Code.
1329.04 Term of License. .Each license issued pursuant to this Section shall expire on
March '31 of each calendar year. -
1326.05 Rules and Regulations.
Subd. 1. Legal Age. No person shall sell any tobacco or tobacco related product,
or tobacco related device to any minor.
Subd. 2. Controlled Substances. No person shall sell or keep for sale any tobacco
containing any controlled substance as defined in Section 1030 of this Code, except
nicotine or tobacco.
Subd. 3. Vending Machine and Moveable Place of business. No person shall sell
any tobacco or tobacco related product, or tobacco related device from a vending
machine or from a moveable place of business.
Subd. 4. Self- Service Merchandising. No person shall sell any tobacco or tobacco
related produce, or tobacco related device by means whereby the customer may have
access to such items without having to request assistance from an employee of the
licensed premises. The assistance or intervention shall entail the actual physical
exchange of the tobacco or tobacco related product or tobacco related device between
the customer and the licensee or employee. All tobacco or tobacco related products, or
tobacco devices shall be stored or displayed behind a sales counter or in other rooms
or display areas which are not freely accessible to customers. Provided however, the
requirements of this Subd, 4 shall not apply to establishments which, i) prohibit minors
from entering the establishment unless accompanied by a parent or legal guardian, ii)
post notice advising of the prohibition is conspicuously displayed at all entrances to
the establishment and, iii) either derive at least ninety percent (90 %) of their revenues
from the sale of tobacco and tobacco related products or limit self service
merchandising to cigars and cigar related products.
Subd. 5. Illegal Possession. No minor shall have in his or her possession any
tobacco or tobacco related product, or tobacco related device. This subdivision shall
not apply to minors lawfully involved in compliance checks.
Subd. 6. Illegal Use. No minor shall smoke, chew, sniff, or otherwise use any
tobacco or tobacco related product, or tobacco related device.
Subd. 7. Illegal Procurement. No minor shall purchase or attempt to purchase or
otherwise obtain any tobacco or tobacco related product, or tobacco related device,
and no person shall purchase or otherwise obtain such items on behalf of a minor. No
person shall coerce or attempt to coerce a minor to illegally purchase or otherwise
Page 5
Minutes /Edina City Council /December 1, 1997
obtain or use any tobacco or tobacco related product, or tobacco related device. This
subdivision shall not apply to minors lawfully involved in compliance checks.
Subd. 8. Use of False Identification. No minor shall attempt to disguise his or her
true age by the use of a false form of identification, whether the identification is that of
another person or one on which the age of the person has been modified or tampered
with to represent an age older than the actual age of the persona
1326.06 Compliance checks and Inspections. All licensed premises shall be open to
inspection by the City or other authorized official during regular business hours. From time.to
time, but at least once per year, the City shall conduct compliance checks by engaging, :with
the written consent of their parents or guardians, Minors over fifteen (15) years but less than
eighteen (18) years, to enter the licensed premises to attempt to purchase, tobacco or tobacco
related products, or tobacco related devices. Minors used for the purpose of compliance
checks shall be supervised by designated law enforcement officers or other designated City
personnel. Minors used for compliance checks shall not be guilty of the unlawful purchase or
attempted purchase,, nor unlawful possession of tobacco or tobacco related products, or
tobacco related devices when -such items are obtained or attempted to be obtained as apart
of the compliance check. No minor used in the compliance checks shall attempt to use a false
identification misrepresenting the minor's age, and all minors lawfully engaged in a
compliance check shall answer all questions about the minor's age for which he or she is
asked. Nothing in this Subsection shall prohibit compliance checks authorized by State or
Federal laws for educational, research, or training purposes, or required for the enforcement
of a particular State or federal law.
1326.07 Violations. The following notification and hearing process will apply to
violations of this Section.
Subd. 1. Notice. Upon discovery of a suspected violation, the alleged violator shall
be issued, either personally or by mail, a citation that sets for the alleged. violations and
which shall inform the alleged violator of his or her rights to .be. heard on the
accusation.
Subd. 2. Hearings. if a person accused of violating this Section so requests, a
hearing shall be scheduled, the time and place of which shall be published and
provided to the accused violator.
Subd. 3. . Hearing Officer. The City Council shall serve as the hearing officer until
such time a hearing officer is appointed by the City Council.
Subd. 4. Decision. If the hearing determines that a violation of this Section did
occur, that decision along with the reasons for finding a violation and the penalty to be
imposed under Subsection 1326.08 of this Section, shall be recorded in writing, a copy
of which shall be provided to the accused violator. Likewise, if the hearing finds -that no
Violation occurred or finds grounds for not imposing any penalty,,such finding shall be
recorded and a copy provided to the acquitted accused violator.
Subd. 5. Appeals. Appeals of any decision made by the Hearing Officer shall be
filed in Hennepin County District Court.
Subd. 6. Misdemeanor Prosecution. Nothing in this Section shall prohibit the City .
from seeking prosecution as a misdemeanor for any alleged violation of this Section. If
Page 6
Minutes /Edina City Council /December 1. 1997
the City elects to seek misdemeanor prosecution, an administrative penalty may also
be imposed.
Subd. 7. Continued Violation. Each violation, and every day in which a violation
occurs or continues, shall constitute a separate offense.
1326.08 The following administrative penalties will be applied as set forth below.
Subd. 1. Licensees. Any licensee found to have violated this Section, or whose
employee shall have violated this Section, shall be charged an administrative fine of
$75.00 for the first violation of this Section; $200.00 for the second offense at the same
licensed premises within a twenty -four month period; $400.00 for a third offense at the
same location within a twenty -four month period and the license shall be suspended
for not less than seven days; and $500.00 for a fourth offense at the same location
within a twenty -four month period. In addition, after the fourth offense, the license shall
be revoked.
Subd. 2. Other Individuals,. other than minors regulated by Subdivision 3 of this
Subsection, found to be in violation of this Section shall be charged an administrative
fee of $50.00.
Subd. 3. Minors. Minors who use or are found in unlawful possession of, or who
unlawfully purchase or attempt to purchase, tobacco or tobacco related products, or
tobacco related devices, shall be charged an administrative fee of $75.00 per offense or
a minimum fee of $25.00 and satisfactory completion of a diversion program acceptable
by the City.
Subd. 4. Misdemeanor. Nothing in this Section shall prohibit the City from seeking
prosecution as a misdemeanor for any violation of this Section.
1326.09 Exceptions and Defenses. Notion in this Section shall prevent the providing of
tobacco related products, or tobacco related devices to a minor as part of a lawfully
recognized religious, spiritual, or cultural ceremony. It shall be an affirmative defense to the
violation of this Section for a person to have reasonably relied on proof of age as described
by State law.
Section 3. Effective Date. This Section shall become effective immediately upon its
passage and publication.
Adopted this 1$' day of December, 1997.
Attest
City Clerk Mayor
Member Faust seconded the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Maetzold, Smith
Ordinance adopted.
BID AWARDED FOR 1998 BLOOMINGTON PUBLIC HEALTH NURSING CONTRACT Member
Hovland asked if the proposed 1998 Bloomington Public Health Nursing Contract in within budget,
historically what have the contract increases been, and what are the sources of funds. Sanitarian
Velde explained the contract is proposed to increase 3% which was the recommended budget
assumption for contractual increases.
Page 7
Minutes /Edina City Council /December 1, 1997
Member Hovland made a motion for award of bid for the 1998 Public Health Nursing Contract
to the Bloomington Division of Public Health at $152,708.00.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Maetzold, Smith
Motion carried.
WINE AND 3.2 BEER LICENSE REINSTATED FOR CHICO'S TACO'S Mayor Smith explained he
removed the reinstatement of Chico's Licenses from the consent agenda because in his opinion
liquor license questions should not be consent items and in the future will be on the agenda for
individual action. In addition, any future tax clearance license issues will be handled as suspensions
and not revocations. Mayor Smith explained he had requested Council review the reinstatement of
Chico's liquor licenses because of the previous Council action revoking the licenses in July at the
request of the Minnesota Revenue Department. Member Maetzold made a motion to reinstate the
wine and 3.2 beer license to Chico's of the Midwest, Inc. dba Chico's Taco's located at 7078
Amundson Avenue. Member Faust seconded the motion.
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Maetzold, Smith
Motion carried.
D'AMICO & SONS NEW WINE AND 3.2 BEER LICENSE GRANTED Member Hovland made a
motion granting a new wine license and 3.2 beer license to D'Amico Catering Inc. dba D'Amico
& Sons located at 3948 West 50"' Street. Member Maetzold seconded the motion.
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Maetzold, Smith
Motion carried.
CONCERN OF RESIDENT AT 4614 EDGEBROOK PLACE NOT EXPRESSED Mayor Smith
explained Mary Hulstrand, 4614 Edgebrook Place requested being placed on the agenda to express
a concern. However, Ms. Hulstrand spoke with the Mayor before the meeting and decided not appear
before the Council.
FIRST READING GRANTED FOR ORDINANCE NO. 1997 -16, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CODE
SECTION 185 TO INCREASE CERTAIN FEES Assistant Finance Director Anderson presented the
proposed 1998 Fees and Charges. He explained staff reviewed current charges with their
corresponding expenditures and revenues. Schedule 1 shows all city fees currently set via ordinance
for the General and Utility Funds. The schedule includes 1997 and 1998 volumes. Schedule 2 shows
only the fees proposed to be increased for 1998. The combined rate increases and volume changes
reflect a 3% increases as discussed during the budget assumption process.
Mayor Smith reviewed the Council's philosophy of keeping fees at a level so that licensees and
permitees are sustaining the cost of doing business.
Member Faust asked about potentially increasing building permit fees to cover the cost of an
additional building inspector. Assistant Finance Director Anderson explained the current building
permit fees are at the highest they can be under state statute. Mayor Smith directed staff to research
building permit fees and bring a report back to Council regarding plans for additional staff in the
Building Department.
After a brief Council discussion of the proposed fee increases, Member Maetzold made a motion
granting First Reading to Ordinance No. 1997 -16, an Ordinance Amending Code Section 185 to
Increase Certain Fees. Member Faust seconded the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Maetzold, Smith
First Reading Granted.
Page 8
1/ =tML*"71-U14TA'1X6= M1 11 • '
RESOLUTION APPROVED SETTING AMBULANCE FEES FOR 1998 Following a brief review,
Member Hovland moved adoption of the resolution setting 1998 Ambulance Fees as follows:
RESOLUTION
SETTING AMBULANCE FEES FOR 1998
BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council does hereby approve and set the following
ambulance service fees for 1998.
AMBULANCE FEES
Service Level Fees for Ambulance Service, including medical treatment and /or transportation
to a medical facility:
Level 1 - ON SCENE TREATMENT
$190.00
Specialized medical services performed at
scene with no transport involved
Level 2 - MINOR CARE (BLS)
$420.00
Vital Signs
Splinting
Bandaging, etc.
Level III - MODERATE CARE (ALS)
$510.00
IV, Nitrous, Nitro Spray
EKG Monitoring
Spine Immobilization
Level IV - MAJOR CARE
$600.00
Medications
MAST (inflated)
Additional Manpower
Mechanical Extrication
Cardiac Pacing
Airway Management
Level V - RESPIRATORY /CARDIAC ARREST
$730.00
Level IV plus any: Cardio /Pulmonary
Resuscitation (CPR)
Defibrillation
OXYGEN ADMINISTRATION
$32.00.
MILEAGE FROM SCENE TO HOSPITAL
$8.00 /mile
Member Maetzold seconded the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Maetzold, Smith
Motion carried.
RESOLUTION SETTING MISCELLANEOUS FEES FOR 1998 Member Faust made a motion to
approve and adopt the following resolution:
RESOLUTION
SETTING MISCELLANEOUS FEES
FOR 1998
BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council does hereby approve and set the following
miscellaneous fees for 1998:
Engine /Fire Company
HazMat Unit
Limited Response
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
SPILLS RESPONSE
$200.00 per hour
$400.00 per hour
$100.00 per hour
Page 9
Minutes /Edina City Council /December 1. 1997
Specialized Equipment Cost + 15% administrative charge
Supplies Cost + 15% administrative charge
Disposal Cost + 15% administrative charge
Other City Resources Cost + 15% administrative charge
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Zoning Compliance Letter $100.00
Member Hovland seconded the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Maetzold, Smith
Resolution approved.
RESOLUTION ADOPTED APPROVING 1998 PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT FEES
AND CHARGES Park and Recreation Direction Keprios explained the 1998 proposed fees had been
reviewed by staff and the Park Board. He noted the City Manager's recommendation for fees on the
18 -hole putting course was $7.00 while the Park Board's recommendation was a $6.00 fee. Manager
Rosland believes the Edinborough Putting Course should generate enough revenue to sustain itself.
Council briefly discussed the fee and consensus was the fee should be $7.00.
Member Hovland suggested increasing the non - patron green fees at Braemar Golf Course. Council
discussed the 1998 proposed green fees and directed staff to prepare a report on green fees at
Edina's golf courses. The report will be presented at the December 15, 1997, meeting.
Member Maetzold made a motion to approve and adopt the following resolution:
RESOLUTION SETTING
1998 PARK AND RECREATION FEES
BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council does hereby approve and set the following 1998
Park and Recreation Fees.
PARK AND RECREATION
PLAYGROUND
$12.00
COACH PITCH
$40.00
ADULT TENNIS INSTRUCTION
$35.00
YOUTH TENNIS INSTRUCTION
$35.00
PEE WEE TENNIS
$25.00
TEAM TENNIS
$60.00
TENNIS CAMP
$75.00
YOUTH SUMMER CLASSIC TENNIS TOURNAMENT $12.00
ADULT SUMMER CLASSIC TENNIS TOURNAMENT
$15.00
ADULT ATHLETIC
FEE'S
SUMMER SOFTBALL
SOFTBALL POST SEASON TOURNEY
Co -Rec & Mens Classic $345.00
Team Entry Fee
$50.00
League
Mens/Womens 35 & Over & $310.00
Industrial League
BASKETBALL
Non - Resident Fee $25.00
5 -Man C League
$425.00
(Individual)
Non - Resident Fee (Team) $150.00
5 -Man B League
$425.00
FALL SOFTBALL
HOCKEY
Co -Rec Leagues $225.00
4 -Man League
$200.00
Mens Leagues $200.00
BROOMBALL
Non - Resident Fee $25.00
Co -Rec League
$475.00
(Individual)
Non - Resident Fee (Team) $150.00
BANDY
Page 10
Minutes /Edina City Council /December 1. 1997
VOLLEYBALL A- Division
Officiated Leagues $225.00 B- Division
Non - Officiated Leagues $125.00 C- Division
Non - Resident (Individual) $10.00
AQUATIC CENTER
ART CENTER
SEASON TICKETS
CLASS FEES * (based on # of hours in PARENT /CHILD WORKSHOPS*
RESIDENT FAMILY:
(includes 1 child and 1 adult)
First 2 members
* $50.00/$60.00
Each additional member
$15.00
Maximum (8 members)
$150.00
RESIDENT INDIVIDUAL:
* $40.00/$50.00
NON - RESIDENT FAMILY:
3 hours $21/$19
First 2 members
* $70.00/$80.00
Each addition al member
$15.00
Maximum (8 members)
$170.00
NON - RESIDENT INDIVIDUAL
* $60.00/$70.00
Daily Admission
$6.00
Admission after 6 P.M.
$4.00
Aquatic Instruction
$50.00
* Early Bird Special if purchased no later than May 22, 1998.
$1,700.00
$1,350.00
$750.00
Page 11
ART CENTER
MEMBERSHIPS: FAMILY = $35.00 INDIVIDUAL - $25.00
CLASS FEES * (based on # of hours in PARENT /CHILD WORKSHOPS*
class)
(includes 1 child and 1 adult)
(Members -10% discount)
NON - MEMBERS
NON- MEMBER/MEMBER
25 hours $4.28
1 '/z hours $15/$13
24 hours $4.28
2 hours $17/$15
21 hours $4.55
3 hours $21/$19
14 hours $4.84
4 hours $27/$25
12 hours $5.12
5 hours $31/$28
8 hours $5.45
6 hours $34/$31
5 hours $5.85
7 hours $39/$35
4 hours $6.35
8 hours $42/$38
*all clay and children's classes add $5.00 *all clay classes add $5.00
ARENA
Hourly Rate (as of 9/95)
$120.00
Open skating (Youth and Adult)
$2.50
Skate Rental
$1.50
Skate Sharpening
$3.00
SEASON TICKETS (effective 10/1/97)
RESIDENT FAMILY:
First 2 members
$60.00
Each additional member
$5.00
Maximum (7 persons)
$85.00
RESIDENT INDIVIDUAL:
$50.00
NON - RESIDENT FAMILY:
First 2 members
$75.00
Each additional member
$5.00
Maximum (7 persons)
$100.00
Page 11
Minutes /Edina City Council /December 1, 1997
NON - RESIDENT INDIVIDUAL $60.00
CLASSES $74.00
BRAEMAR GOLF
COURSE
PATRON CARDS (until April.1)
Individual
$55.00
Executive Course
$25.00
PATRON CARDS (after April 1)
Individual
$60.00
Executive Course
$25.00
COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS
Resident
$18.00
Non - Resident
$22.00
LOCKERS
Men's 72 inch
$35.00
Men's 42 inch
$25.00
Ladies 72 inch
$15.00
CLUB STORAGE
$35.00
CLUB RENTAL
$ 7.00
PULL CARTS
$ 2.25
GOLF CARS
18 holes
$22.00
9 holes
$13.00
18 holes /person with disability /sgl rider
$11.00
Group Car Fees
$30.00
GROUP GOLF LESSONS
Adult
$62.00
Junior
$32.00
BRAEMAR EXECUTIVE COURSE
BRAEMAR ROOM
Resident - wedding related $625.00
Non - residents -wedding related $675.00
Other events $250-$675
Concession Fees (an annual increase of 5 %, as a general rule
FRED RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
GOLF RANGE
Large Bucket
Small Bucket
Warm -Up Bucket
GOLF DOME
Large Bucket
Senior Bucket
Time Golf % hour
Hourly Field Rental
League
Daily Passes
SEASON PASSES
Edina Family (first 2 members)
Each Additional Member
$5.50
$3.50
$1.75
$6.00
$5.75
$8.50
$100.00
$695.00
EDINBOROUGH PARK
$3.50
Page 12
$205.00
$ 15.00
Maximum (7 members)
Edina Individual
Non -Edina Family (first 2 members)
Each Additional Member
Maximum (7 Members)
Non -Edina Individual
Towel Fee
Skate Rental
BUILDING RENTALS
Com'I Use/Trade $2,500.00
Shows
Category $17 /day +
#1 /Edina $12 /person (setup /down)
Boards /Assoc.
May through
October
Category #21hr Edina Civic & Edina Schools
Monday thru Thursday
Great Hall $150.00
Theatre $75.00
Grotto $ 50.00
Category #3 (per hour) General Fees
Great Hall $300.00
Theatre $125.00
Grotto $ 75.00
Category #4 (Exclusive Rental)
Friday Evening $1,500.00
Saturday $1,500.00
Evening
Rental Concession Items
Paddle Boats
2 person boat ' /z hr
4 person boat' /2 hr
Winter sled % hr
Ice Skates
% day - % room
Full day - % room
Full day -' /z room
DELETE
$ 5.00
$ 3.00
$1.50
$125.00
$200.00
$400.00
Building Rental (Friday Evening)
'/z evening - % room $200.00
'/z evening - full room $400.00
Minutes /Edina City Council /December 1. 1997
$280.00
$190.00
$230.00
$ 20.00
$330.00
$210.00
$ 0.75
$ 1.50
Banners $150.00
Use of Rink Area $125.00
Cover Ice Area $400.00
Domestic Photo Shoot (hourly)
Any Park Area
$50.00
Blocked Off
Grotto
$ 50.00
Theatre
$ 75.00
Great Hall
$ 75.00
Ice Rink
$100.00
Commercial Photo Shoot (hourly)
Any Park Area
$ 200.00
Blocked Off
Grotto $ 200.00
Theatre $ 200.00
Great Hall $ 300.00
Ice Rink $ 300.00
CENTENNIAL LAKES
Weekend Rental -
Full Evening (6 PM -1AM)
Friday evening
Saturday evening
Sunday Rentals
% room -
4 hour increments
after 2 PM
Full room - 4 hour
increments after 2
PM
Champion Putting
9 hole
18 hole
Lawn Games
Per hour - Per
person
Page 13
$600.00
$600.00
$200.00
$400.00
N/A
$6.00
$3.00
Minutes /Edina City Council /December 1. 1997
Per field - per day
PARK
DEPARTMENT RENTALS
General Park Areas:
Per day /w /formal
Van Valkenburg /Courtney Fields
gardens /gazebo
(Residents Only)
Commercial Use (i.e.
$ 50.00
Per field /day $150.00
TV) /hour
includes building
Commercial use with
$100.00
Edina Athletic Associations
light/hour
Picnic shelter /day -
$100.00
Field User $6.00
Cornelia
fee /participant
Showmobile /day
$700.00
Edina Hockey Association
Outdoor Hockey Rink
Athletic Fields - Residents Only:
Field User $6.00
fee /participant
Per field - per day
$100.00
Arneson Acres Terrace
Room:
Per day /w /formal
$125.00
gardens /gazebo
Per hour, first hour
$ 50.00
Each additional hour
$ 25.00
up to 4 hours
Motion seconded by Member Faust.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Maetzold, Smith
Motion carried.
CLAIMS PAID Member Maetzold made a motion to approve payment of the following claims as
shown in detail on the Check Register dated November 25, 1997, and consisting of 26 pages;
General Fund $229,381.87; C.D.B.G. $35.00; Communications $4,262.85; Working Capital
$17,892.49; Art Center $14,500.24; Golf Dome Fund $5,215.84; Swimming Pool Fund $6,247.05;
Golf Course Fund $6,255.36; Ice Arena Fund $5,396.80; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes
$30,521.11; Utility Fund $325,708.57; Storm Sewer Utility Fund $2,297.37: Recycling Program
$42,082.89; Liquor Dispensary Fund $151,648.42; Construction Fund $46,175.15; Park Bond
Fund $482,414.84; 1-494 Commission $19.17; TOTAL $1,370,055.02. Member Faust seconded the
motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Maetzold, Smith
Motion carried.
There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Smith declared the meeting
adjourned at 8:30 P.M.
City Clerk
Page 14
MINUTES
OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE'
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL
ON DECEMBER 3 1997A 5:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Faust, Kelly, Maeztold and Mayor Smith.
TRUTH IN TAXATION PUBLIC HEARING HELD FOR PROPOSED 1998 CITY BUDGET.
Pursuant to published notice given, the Edina City Council conducted a public hearing on the
proposed property tax increase in the 1998 Budget for the City of Edina, as mandated by
Chapter 375, Laws of Minnesota 1993.
Mayor Smith stated the purpose of the Truth in Taxation_ hearing. would focus on the proposed
1998 City of Edina Budget. The budget review relates to the moneys' source and how they are
expended on the various functions and services of the City. Residents with questions relating to
the valuation placed on their homes should plan to appear at the Board of Review in April of
1998. Mayor Smith explained that the Minnesota legislature determines the tax rate structure of
residential property. In addition, Mayor Smith explained that Council would not adopt the
City's final property tax levy and final budget 'at the hearing but at a subsequent Council
meeting. The Budget process began with the formulation of budget assumptions at a series of
meetings in July. After reviewing the budget assumptions, Council directed staff to come back
with a detailed draft budget broken down by departments. He stated that the proposed 1998
Budget totals $17,913,763 and represents a 4.88% increase or $834,084 over the 1997 Budget.
Lila Larson, 4800 School Road, stated she is not complaining about taxes, but is dismayed over
the lack of services, specifically services to senior citizens. The existing senior center facility
does not encourage seniors in fragile conditions to use it. Ms. Larson stated she is eager to have
the City look at its citizens needs. Ms. Larson informed the Council Edina has the largest senior
citizen population in Minnesota. She is willing to pay additional taxes to see their needs are
met.
Mayor Smith noted the proposed budget for 1998 does contain monies to explore the options
available to the City for a Senior Center. Manager Rosland confirmed the Park Board has
reviewed the Senior Center and, staff will bring this issue before the Council shortly after the
first of the year.
Mayor Smith recessed the meeting from 5:10, p.m. to 5:20 p.m. to allow any other citizens time
to arrive and have an opportunity to speak.
Mayor Smith reconvened the Truth In Taxation Hearing at 5:20 p.m.
Kay Bach, 6625 Dakota Trail, explained she has for years thought she would come and say good
things. Ms. Bach complimented the City on the extraordinary job they do with a small budget.
Mayor Smith closed the public hearing and explained the Council will consider the 1998 Budget
at the December 15,1997, meeting.
There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Smith called for a motion to
adjourn the meeting at 5:25 p.m.
Member Maetzold made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Member Faust seconded the
motion.
Ayes: Faust, Kelly, Maetzold, and Mayor Smith
Meeting adjourned.
City Clerk
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
HELD AT CITY HALL
DECEMBER 1,1997 - 7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Faust, Hovland, Maetzold and
Chair Smith.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Faust and
seconded by Commissioner Maetzold approving and adopting the HRA Consent
Agenda as presented.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Maetzold, Smith
Motion carved.
*HRA MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 17, 1997, APPROVED Motion made by
Commissioner Faust and seconded by Commissioner Maetzold approving the .
HRA Minutes of November 17. 1997.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
*HEARING DATE SET OF JANUARY 5, 1998, FOR BUDGET AMENDMENT TO 50TH
& FRANCE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT Motion made by
Commissioner Faust and seconded by Commissioner Maetzold setting January 5,
1998, as hearing date for Budget Amendment to 50t' & France Tax Increment
Financing District.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
CLAIMS PAID Commissioner Hovland made a motion to approve payment of the
following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated November 25,
1997, and consisting of one page totaling, $9,650.48. Commissioner Maetzold
seconded the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Maetzold, Smith
Motion carved.
There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, Chair Smith declared the meeting
adjourned.
Executive Director
rw
U'
i�
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To:
Mayor & City Council
Agenda Item I11. A.
From:
Craig Larsen
Consent ❑
City Planner
Information Only ❑
Date:
December 15, 1997
Mgr. Recommends ❑
To HRA
Subject:
S -97 -9, Final Plat Approval.
0
To Council
The Coventry at Centennial Lakes 8t'
Action ❑
Motion
Addition.
Laukka Jarvis, Inc.
x❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Recommendation:
Approval of Plat.
Info /Background:
The proposed 10 unit building is located in the northeasterly corner of the
approved 98 unit townhouse development. The proposed building is consistent with the
approved development plan.
i
Ae
THE COVENTRY AT CENTENNIAL LAKES 8TH ADDITION
DETAIL
t" OUTLOT A
i yn ^� �i ,. e, so. 7yo 9
31.1
10 y�
T .,
i
m°7r, w,X86
o°sr
-. .
.... ..... ........
is
,toe
ys
TLE D
L' 5 tr'7
I ` 6itiY, inc.
I L"I
--v
RHFFT I OF I SHEETS
P.R.D
J.
THE COVENTRY
AT CENTENNIAL LAKES 8TH
ADDITION
swmrlrw
65&55
373.63
T V
OUTLOT B
Q917.9
.... ..
COR ClIS04WOrW
Ti
g
lij
-E-N-NiAl.
T A.
Zs
-
------------
A
L — — — —
Pill'
CF� 0 5 127
13RW, Inc.
510 es a so too ISO
SCALE IN FEET
KAAWS ARE BASED (" M •SWWD DATUM
0 DIMRS " womumail'
RHFFT I OF I SHEETS
r`
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Debra Mangen
City Clerk
Date: December 15, 1997
Subject: Ord. No. 1997 -18
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
Agenda Item W.A.
Consent
Information Only F1
Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
® To Council
Action r-] Motion
Resolution
® Ordinance
Discussion
Recommendation:
Motion granting first reading and waiving second reading for Ordinance No. 1997-18, amending,
Section 1305 Scavengers and Section 185 Fees and Charges.
Info /Background:
While preparing the annual renewals of scavengers' licenses, which are covered under Edina
Code Section 1305 (attached), staff discovered a change in Minnesota Statutes. The change
preempts cities from requiring scavengers to obtain a city license. MS115.56 Subdivision.2
subparagraph (4)(g) states: "Local units of government may not require additional local licenses
for individual sewage treatment system professionals." However, cities may still regulate the
scavengers' operations requiring permits to perform work as well as establishing standards.
I have prepared an ordinance amendment removing the' licensing requirement and fee from our
code, while retaining the regulatory portion of the section.
4
City of Edina Trades and Occupations 1305.08
Section 1305 - Scavengers
1305.01 Definition. "Scavenger", : whenever used in this Section, means a person who
cleans, pumps; -removes, transports, leases and disposes of the contents of private sewage
disposal systems or portable toilet devices as defined in Section 710 of this Code.
1305.62 License Required. No person shall act or render services as a scavenger within
the City without obtaining a license as provided in this Section.
1305.03 License Procedure and Fee. The provisions of Section 160 and Section 165 of this
Code, including the penalty provisions, shall apply to the license required by this Section
and to each license holder except that licenses shall be issued or denied by the Sanitarian.
in addition to the information required by Section 160 and Section 165 of this Code, the
application for a license or renewal of license shall be accompanied by the fee set forth in
Section 185 of this Code and a description of the equipment which the applicant proposes
to .use for scavenging in the City.
1305.04 Scavenging Equipment. All substances removed from any private sewage disposal
system or portable toilet device as defined in Section 710 of this Code shall be conveyed
to the place of disposal in tanks or other receptacles constructed of a metal or other non-
porous material provided with at least two manholes on the top thereof and an outlet at
the bottom, adequately capped to prevent any leakage.
1305.05 Overnight Storage. No vehicle containing any substance as described in
Subsection 1305.05 shall be stored overnight in any place in the City.
1305.06 Spilling. No substance as described in Subsection 1305.05 shall be allowed to
spill, splash, leak or become deposited any public street or alley, or on the surface of the
ground.
1305.07 Disposal of Waste Material. No person shall deposit any substances as described
in Subsection 1305.05 anywhere in the City except into the City sanitary sewer system.
Such substances may be discharged into the system only at the places and at the times
designated by the Engineer and upon the scavenger's payment of the fee set forth in
Section 185 of this Code.
1305.08 Permit and Report Required.
Subd. 1 Permit. Before rendering scavenger services, the scavenger shall obtain
a permit from the Sanitarian. The application for permit shall be made on forms
provided by the Sanitarian and shall be accompanied by a permit fee in the amount
set forth in Section 185 of this Code. No permit shall be required for servicing a
portable toilet device as defined in Section 710 of this Code.
1305-1
City of Edina
Trades and Occupations 1305.09
Subd. 2 Report. After rendering scavenger services to any premises in the City,
the scavenger shall notify the Sanitarian in writing that services have been so
rendered including in the notice (i) the name of the owner or occupant and the
address of the premises, (ii) date of the pumping, (iii) capacity of the tank, (iv)
percentages of scum and sludge, and (v) such other information as may be required.
by the Sanitarian. In an emergency, the scavenger may render services at any
premises without a permit, provided verbal notification is given in advance to the
Sanitarian, if the emergency occurs within regular business hours, and provided a
permit is obtained on the next business day.
1305.09 Owner Responsibility. Persons may employ only a licensed scavenger to clean,
PUMP, remove, transport, or dispose of any substance from a private sewage disposal
system or toilet devise as defined in Section 710 of this Code, on property within the City
which is owned, rented, operated or managed by such persons.
History: Ord 1302 codified 1970; amended by 1302 Al 5- 31 -81, 1302-A2 12 -2 -81
Cross Reference: Sections 160, 165, 185, 710
1305-2
I
EDINA ORDINANCE NO. 1997- 18
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 1305
SCAVENGERS BY ELIMINATING THE
CITY LICENSING PROVISIONS
The City Council of the City of Edina Ordains:
Section 1. Section 1305 of the City Code is hereby amended by repealing the following
subsections:
Subsections 1305.02 License Required and 1305.03 License Procedure.
Section 2. Subsections 1305.04, 1305.05, 1305.06, 1305.07, 1305.08 and 1305.09 are
hereby renumbered Subsections 1305.02, 1305.03, 1305.04, 1305.05, 1305.06, and 1305.07
respectively.
Section 3. Schedule A of Section 185 is hereby amended by deleting Fee No. 275.
Section 4. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect, after its
adoption and publication according to law.
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Published:
Attest:
City Clerk Mayor
1
0
COUNCIL
CHE, EGISTER
11 -� -1997 (12:00)
page 1
CHECK NO
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
13261
*>
12/15/97
$525.40
BRAUN INTERTEC
PROF FEES ARCH AND EN
097520
GRANDVIEW
PRO FEE
------------------
ARCH /E
<
-
$525.40*
13262
12/15/97
$25,978.10
C.S. McCrossan Construct
PARKS
97 -3 #5
CENTENNIAL
LAK
PARKS
< *>
$25,978.10*
13263
12/15/97
$2,500.00
Christ C. Lee & Sons Inc
LAND
120397
50TH STREET
LAND
< *>
$2,500.00*
13264
12/15/97
12/15/97
$855.00
$1,176.66
DORSEY & WHITNEY
DORSEY
Legal fees
585421
GRANDVIEW
PRO FEES
LEG /S
12/15/97
$550.75
& WHITNEY
DORSEY & WHITNEY
PROFESSIONAL FEES LEG
585421
CENTENNIAL
LAK
PRO FEES
LEG /S
< *>
$2,582.41*
PROFESSIONAL FEES LEG
585421
50TH STREET
PRO FEES
LEG /S
13265
12/15/97
$5,399.93
GLOBAL SPECIALTY CONTRAC
PARKS
97 -4 #3
CENTENNIAL
LAK
PARKS
< *>
$5,399.93*
13266
12/15/97
12/15/97
$87.86
Magnuson Sod /Haag Servic
PARKS
29877
CENTENNIAL
LAK
PARKS
12/15/97
$131.79
$175.73
Magnuson Sod /Haag Servic
Magnuson
PARKS
30177
CENTENNIAL
LAK
PARKS
< *>
Sod /Haag Servic
PARKS
30516
CENTENNIAL
LAK
PARKS
$395.38*
13267
12/15/97
$540.00
MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONT
LAND
R3234300
GRANDVIEW
LAND
< *>
$540.00*
13268
12/15/97
$555.64
PRIOR LAKE AGGREGATE
PARKS
711092
CENTENNIAL
LAK
PARKS
< *>
$555.64*
13269
12/15/97
$23,169.25
Veit & Company Inc
PARKS
97 -5FNLP
CENTENNIAL
LAK
PARKS
< *>
$23,169.25*
$61,646.11*
COUNCIL
CO REGISTER
11 -LiEC -1997 (11:59)
CHECK NO DATE
No
CHECK AMOUNT
AMOUNT
VENDOR
E----
page 1
--ECK
184417
44 -- 4444 --
12/15/97
-CHECK ------
$85.00
44 -- - ------------------ -
A -1 ROOTMASTER
-ION
- - - -- 4444 --
i --t
INVOICE
444-- 4807
PROGRAM OBJECT
--------------------------------------------
PO NUM
< >
t
Pump septic at Arneso 184807
Arn
BUILDING MAINT CONTR REPAIRS
9879
184418
*>
12/15/97
$92.34
ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY
Relay
<
$92.34*
4217000
EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES
9551
184419
< *>
12/15/97
$1,857.30
ACCESS RENTALS INC
Genie repair
$1,857.30*
27420001
ED BUILDING & CONTR REPAIRS
9670
184420
< *>
12/15/97
$197.88
$197.88*
ACTION MAILING SERVICE
Mail rocess
P
71786
GENERAL(BILLIN
PROF SERVICES
184421
< *>
12/15/97
$14.51
$14.51*
AEI ELECTRONIC PARTS
Repair arts
P
302849
GOLF DOME
REPAIR PARTS
9812
184422
*
12/15/97
$67.99
$67.99*
Aermotor Windmill Corpor Windmill - Memorial
017286
GOLF PROG
MEN'S CLUB
8975
184424
12/15/97
12/15/97
$414.29
AIRTOUCH CELLULAR
Phone
40619351
12/15/97
$825.38
AIRTOUCH CELLULAR
Phone
EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES
12/15/97
$98.21
$15.89
AIRTOUCH CELLULAR
AIRTOUCH
TELEPHONE
40654881
111097
EQUIPMENT S ACCESSORIES
INSPECTIONS
12/15/97
12/15/97
$296.34
CELLULAR
AIRTOUCH CELLULAR
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE
111097
111097
TELEPHONE
PUBLIC HEALTH TELEPHONE
12/15/97
$82.48
$7.71
AIRTOUCH CELLULAR
AIRTOUCH CELLULAR
TELEPHONE
111097
FIRE DEPT. ON TELEPHONE
ADMINISTRATIO N TELEPHONE
12/15/97
12/15/97
$162.63
AIRTOUCH CELLULAR
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE
111097
PARK ADMIT. TELEPHONE
12/15/97
$27.02
$10.27
AIRTOUCH CELLULAR
TELEPHONE
111097
111097
PARK M& TELEPHONE
TREES
12/15/97
$134.49
AIRTOUCH CELLULAR
AIRTOUCH CELLULAR
TELEPHONE
111097
MAINAN
& AI NTE TELEPHONE
CLUB HOUSE TELEPHONE
12/15/97
12/15/97
$170.58
AIRTOUCH CELLULAR
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE
111097
DISTRIBUTION TELEPHONE
12/15/97
$727.91
$440.30
AIRTOUCH CELLULAR
AIRTOUCH
TELEPHONE
111097
111097
ENGINEERING GE TELEPHONE
& OVRH
12/15/97
12/15/97
$14.74
CELLULAR
AIRTOUCH CELLULAR
Cellulars
Cellulars
111097.
TELEPHONE
PATROL
PATROL. TELEPHONE
` *>
$35.44
$3,463.68*
AIRTOUCH CELLULAR
Cellulars
111097.
111097.
INVESTIGATION TELEPHONE
ANIMAL
CONTROL GENERAL SUPPLI
184425
< *>
12/15/97
$5.11
ALBINSON
Copies
$5.11*
662436
ST LIGHTING RE REPAIR PARTS
9357
184426
< *>
12/15/97
$100.00
$100.00*
Aldridge & Sanen Inc
COST OF GOODS - PRO S
328
PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR
8879
184427
12/15/97
12/15/97
$259.00
$321.00
All Saints Brands
All Saints Brands
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
2370
YORK SELLING CST OF
< *>
$580.00*
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
2371
GDS BEE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
184428
*>
12/15/97
.$97.64
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
<
$97.64*
113097/G
GRILL LAUNDRY
184429
< *>
12/15/97
$177.32
AMERICAN SEMI PARTS
Stra s
P
$177,32*
832340
EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES
9576
184430
*>
12/15/97
12/15/97
$803.45
$887.37
ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS INC
ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS INC
Mobile unit
Mobile
16959
EQUIPMENT OPER RADIO SERVICE
9373
`
$1,690.82*
radio
16960
EQUIPMENT OPER RADIO SERVICE
9375
COUNCIL
CHE(N REGISTER
11 -oEC -1997 (11:59)
page 2
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
184431
12/15/97
$12.40
Arch Paging
Pager for Vince
120197
BUILDING MAINT TELEPHONE
9849
< *>
$12.40*
184432
12/15/97
$14,406.00
ARNT CONSTRUCTION CO INC
Dozer rental
7463
STREET RENOVAT
CONTR REPAIRS
9395
12/15/97
$14,450.00
ARNT CONSTRUCTION CO.INC
Equip Contract Const
7467
STREET RENOVAT
CONTR REPAIRS
< *>
$28,856.00*
184433
12/15/97
$45.00
ARTISTS OF MINNESOTA
ADVERTISING OTHER
112597
ART CENTER ADM
ADVERT OTHER
< *>
$45.00*
184434
12/15/97
$190:91
ASPLUND COFFEE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
12019900
POOL TRACK GRE
COST OF GD SOL
1089
< *>
$190.91*
184435
12/15/97
$137.83
ASTLEFORD EQUIPMENT COMP
Muffler
T61994
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
9376
12/15/97
$6.30
ASTLEFORD EQUIPMENT COMP
Switch
T62269
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
9527
< *>
$144.13*
184436
12/15/97
$408.89
AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES
Cellular Invest
111997
INVESTIGATION
TELEPHONE
12/15/97
$17.62
AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES
TELEPHONE
111997
CLUB HOUSE
TELEPHONE
< *>
$426.51*
184437
12/15/97
$11.46
AT &T
TELEPHONE
111897
CENT SVC GENER
TELEPHONE
12/15/97
$10.66
AT &T
TELEPHONE
111897
CENT SVC GENER
TELEPHONE
12/15/97
$10.66
AT &T
TELEPHONE
111897
CENT SVC GENER
TELEPHONE
12/15/97
$5.48
AT &T
TELEPHONE
111897
CENT SVC GENER
TELEPHONE
12/15/97
$19.80
AT &T
TELEPHONE
111897
CENT SVC GENER
TELEPHONE
<*>
$58.06*
184438
12/15/97
$4.13
AT &T
TELEPHONE
171897
ADMINISTRATION
TELEPHONE
12/15/97
$4.77
AT &T
TELEPHONE
111897
INSPECTIONS
TELEPHONE
12/15/91
$24.05
AT &T
TELEPHONE
111897
PARK MAINTENAN
TELEPHONE
12/15/97
$6.98
AT &T
TELEPHONE
111897-
FIRE DEPT. GEN
TELEPHONE
12/15/97
$3.56
AT &T
TELEPHONE
111897.
ENGINEERING GE
.
TELEPHONE
< *>
$43.49*
184439
12/15/97
$214.00
ATLAS COPCO RENTAL INC
Freight
738862
MAINT OF COURS
SVC CONTR EQUI
8609
< *>
$214.00*
1.84440
12/15/97
$75.00
ATOM
Cont Ed - Police
112697
POLICE DEPT. G
CONF & SCHOOLS
-
< *>
'$75.00*
184441
12/15/97
$45.36
AUTOMOBILE SERVICE COMPA
Alignment
10109
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
< *>
$45.36*
184442
12/15/97
$33.15
AVERY, CYNTHIA
Art work sold
120497
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
< *>
$33.15*
184443
12/15/97
$85.23
BACHMANS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1892018
GOLF ADMINISTR
GENERAL SUPPLI
9806
12/15/97
$105.47
BACHMANS
TREES, FLOWERS,.SHRUB
2296019
ED BUILDING .&
TREES FLWR SHR
9892
< *>
$190.70*
184444
12/15/97
$7,366.92
BARR ENGINEERING COMPANY.Soil
/lead.testing
23279353
PKBOND CIP
EQUIP REPLACEM
< *>
$7,366.92*
184445
12/15/97
$28.93
BARTOLETTI, SUE
Art work sold
120497
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
C)DUNCIL CHI REGISTER
11 -1997 (11:59)
CHECK NO DATE
--------------------------------------
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE PROGRAM
page 3
*'
$28.93*
------------------
-------
- - - - -- ---------------
-----------
-------------------------------------
CT PO NUM
184446
12/15/97
12/15/97
$140.97
$170.38
BATTERIES PLUS
BATTERIES PLUS
cell phone batteries D68626
Cell batteries
GENERAL MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI 8763
< *'
$311.35*
D70366
GENERAL MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI 9141
184447
12/15/97
12/15/97
$211.46
$605.10
Becker Arena Products
Becker Arena Products
GENERAL SUPPLIES
Poly boards
7078
ARENA BLDG /GRO
GENERAL SUPPLI 9751
*'
$816.56*
7183
EDINA ATHLETIC
GENERAL SUPPLI
184448
12/15/97
12/15/97
$304.25
$78.85
BELLBOY
BELLBOY
CORPORATION
CORPORATION
COST OF GOODS SOLD
COST
LI 13151500
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
*'
12/15/97
$437.16
BELLBOY
CORPORATION
OF GOODS SOLD
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI 13227500
MI
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
`
$820.26*
26762500
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
184449
` *'
12/15/97
$74.75
$74.75*
BENN, BRADLEY
Art work sold
120497
ART.CNTR PROG
SALES
OTHER
184450
12/15/97
$135.00
BENNETT,
KATHRYN
Prof Sery AC
$135.00*
120897
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
184451
12/15/97
12/15/97
$280.00
$42.90
BERGFORD
BERGFORD
TRUCKING
TRUCKING
Liquor deliver
112597/5 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD
` *'
12/15/97
$276.30
BERGFORD
TRUCKING
Liquor delivery
Liquor delivery
LIQU
112897/Y
$599.20*
YORK SfiLLINGIN
CST OF GD LIQU
184452
*'
12/15/97
$492.00
BERGLUND,
STANLEY
Ball bin
`
$492.00*
120597
GOLF DOME
CONTR REPAIRS 9623
184453
12/15/97
$41.00
$41.00*
BERNHJELM, WILLIAM
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 112497
POLICE DEPT.
G
CONF & SCHOOLS
184455
12/15/97
12/15/97
$4.66
$20.77
BERTELSON
BERTELSON
BROS. INC.
BROS. INC.
Highliters /cartridges 5053850
STREET NAME SI
GENERAL
12/15/97
12/15/97
- $40.90
BERTELSON
BROS. INC.
Office supplies
OFFICE SUPPLIES
5056520
CM476448
PW BUILDING
SUPPLI 9337
REPAIR PARTS 9341
12/15/97
$37.70
$331.00
BERTELSON
BERTELSON
BROS. INC.
BROS. INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
5089710
POLICE DEPT. G
ARENA ADMINIST
OFFICE SUPPLIE
OFFICE
12/15/97
12/15/97
$327.13
BERTELSON
BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
5090100
5098120
CENT SVC GENER
SUPPLIE 9651
GENERAL SUPPLI
12/15/97
$29.53
$69.77
BERTELSON
BERTELSON
BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
5098230
POLICE DEPT. G
LIQUOR 50TH ST
OFFICE SUPPLIE
12/15/97
12/15/97
$36.19
BERTELSON
BROS. INC.
BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
5098240
5098240
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL SUPPLI 9898
GENERAL SUPPLI 9898
12/15/97
$27.59
$16.00
BERTELSON
BERTELSON
BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
5098240
GENERAL(BILLIN
ENGINEERING GE
GENERAL SUPPLI
12/15/97
$104.03
BERTELSON
BROS. INC.
BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL
5098240
LIQUOR 50TH ST
GENERAL SUPPLI
GENERAL SUPPLI
12/15/97
12/15/97
$11.61
$7.16
BERTELSON
BERTELSON
BROS. INC.
SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
5098240
5098240
FINANCE
ADMINISTRATION
GENERAL SUPPLI
12/15/97
12/15/97
$50.97
BERTELSON
BROS. INC.
BROS. INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
5100970
5106710
POLICE DEPT. G
GENERAL SUPPLI
OFFICE SUPPLIE
12/15/97
$51.12
$77.09
BERTELSON
BERTELSON
BROS. INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
5112280
POLICE DEPT. G
POLICE DEPT.
OFFICE SUPPLIE
12/15/97
$30.64
BERTELSON
BROS. INC.
BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL
5116830
G
CENT SVC GENER
OFFICE SUPPLIE 9467
GENERAL SUPPLI 9977
12/15/97
12/15/97
$72.85
BERTELSON
BROS. INC.
SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
5116830
5116830
ENGINEERING GE
GENERAL SUPPLI 9977
12/15/97
$7.61
$331.00
BERTELSON
BERTELSON
BROS. INC.
BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
5116830
LIQUOR 50TH ST
PARK ADMIN.
GENERAL SUPPLI 9977
GENERAL
` *'
$1,603.52*
GENERAL SUPPLIES
5118190
CENT SVC GENER
SUPPLI 9977
GENERAL SUPPLI
COUNCIL
CHECn REGISTER
11 -uEC -1997 (11:59)
page 4
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
184456
12/15/97
$507.64
Best Access Systems of M
GENERAL SUPPLIES
56573
ARENA BLDG /GRO
GENERAL SUPPLI
9641
< *>
$507.64*
184457
12/15/97
$10,371.92
BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
76132
PKBOND CIP
EQUIP REPLACEM
12/15/97
$2,373.97
BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
76141
PKBOND CIP
EQUIP REPLACEM
12/15/97
$100.09
BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS
42A Wear
76176
PKBOND CIP
EQUIP REPLACEM
12/15/97
$6,602.49
BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
76185
PKBOND CIP
EQUIP REPLACEM
< *>
$19,448.47*
184458
12/15/97
$524.19
BLACK & DECKER
Nibbler repair
2075049
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
9249
< *>
$524.19*
184459
12/15/97
$100.00
BLOOD, DAVID
Police service
DEC 1997
RESERVE PROGRA
PERS SERVICES
< *>
$100.00*
184460
12/15/97
$44.46
Bobby Beads
CRAFT SUPPLIES
37
ART CENTER ADM
CRAFT SUPPLIES
9499
< *>
$44.46*
184461
12/15/97
$40.36
BOYER TRUCKS
Part
654811
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
9381
12/15/97
$102.75
BOYER TRUCKS
Part
655300
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
9818
12/15/97
$43.42
BOYER TRUCKS
Switch assy
657563
EQUIPMENT OPER
GENERAL SUPPLI
9528
12/15/97
$22.32
BOYER TRUCKS
Cable
660557
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
9550
< *>
$208.85*
184462
12/15/97
$125.14
BRAEMAR PRINTING
PRINTING
49599
GOLF ADMINISTR
PRINTING
9807
12/15/97
$138.92
BRAEMAR PRINTING
Printing
49563
GOLF DOME
ADVERT OTHER
9809
< *>
$264.06*
184463
12/15/97
$251.38
BRAUN INTERTEC
Consulting fee AC
98160
ART CENTER BLD
GENERAL SUPPLI
9294
12/15/97
$2,512.50
BRAUN INTERTEC
Prof eng sery
098241
ENGINEERING GE
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$2,763.88*
184464
12/15/97
$234.86
BRIN NORTHWESTERN GLASS
Door repair
241233
CITY HALL GENE
CONTR REPAIRS
9891
< *>
$234.86*
184465
12/15/97
$168.70
Brock White
Ice arena
3290301
ARENA BLDG /GRO
GENERAL SUPPLI
9340
< *>
$168.70*
184466
12/15/97
$61.75
BROCKWAY, MAUREEN
Art work sold
120497
ART CNTR PROD
SALES OTHER
< *>
$61.75*
184467
12/15/97
$72.00
BUDGET PROJECTOR REPAIR
Contracted repairs
6830
MEDIA. LAB
CONTR REPAIRS
9638
< *>
$72.00*
184468
12/15/97
$28.60
BUELL, KIM
Art work mold
12n497
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
< *>
$28.60*
184469
12/15/97
$100.00
BUTLER, GEORGE
Police services
DEC 1997
RESERVE PROGRA
PERS SERVICES
< *>
$100.00*
184470
12/15/97
$387.03
C.S. MCCROSSAN CONSTRUCT
Base
4340
PKBOND CIP
EQUIP REPLACEM
< *>
$387.03*
184471
12/15/97
$314.97
Camas
Pamela parking lot
1522218
PKBOND CIP
EQUIP REPLACEM
12/15/97
$324.12
Camas
Class 5
1522218
PKBOND CIP
EQUIP REPLACEM
1 f
'
COUNCIL
Ch, REGISTER
11 .- -1997 (11:59)
CHECK NO DATE
- ------
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
page 5
184471
---------- ---------------
12/15/97
--
$152.94
-- ---- - ---------- ----- - -
Camas
- - --
PROGRAM
OBJECT PO NUM
12/15/97
$322.30
Camas
Pamela parking lot
Class 5
1522219
PKBOND CIP
____ ____________
EQUIP REPLACEM
12/15/97
$636.34
Camas
Concrete
1522219
PKBOND CIP
EQUIP REPLACEM
12/15/97
12/15/97
$694.61
$430.39
Camas
Camas
Concrete
1524350
1035283
DISTRIBUTION
DISTRIBUTION
FILL MATERIALS
CONCRETE
<*>
$2,875.67*
Concrete
1035465
PKBOND CIP
5582
EQUIP REPLACEM 5582
72
18 *;
12/15/97
$40.97
$40.97*
CAMPBELL, RICHARD
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
112697
POLICE DEPT. G CONF
& SCHOOLS
184473
` *>
12/15/97
$50.00
$50.00*
CANTON, JANET
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
120897
FINANCE
MILEAGE
184474
*>
12/15/97
12/15/97
$464.29
$396.69
CARLSON EQUIPMENT COMPAN Asphalt roller
CARLSON EQUIPMENT COMPAN Rental
404484
GENERAL MAINT
EQUIP RENTAL
`
$860.98*
408911
PKBOND CIP
EQUIP REPLACEM
184475
` *>
12/15/97
$592.51
$592.51*
Carpet Court
New kitchen floor
120497
CDBG PROG
PROF SERVICES
184476
` *>
12/15/97
$15.00
$15.00*
Casey, Jane
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 07003
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GDS MIX
184477
12/15/97
12/15/97
$275.57
$521.34
CATCO
CATCO
Fittings
Fittings 355283
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS 9372
*>
12/15/97
$541.82
CATCO
g
Hose
355793
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES 9574
`
$1,338.73*
355794
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES 9575
184478
12/15/97
12/15/97
$7,607.82
$4,347.18
CDW COMPUTER CENTERS
CDW COMPUTER CENTERS
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
6639968
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP REPLACEM
` *>
12/15/97
$126.19
CDW COMPUTER CENTERS
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
6662502
POLICE DEPT. G
9472
EQUIP REPLACEM 9472
$12,081.19*
6662504
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP REPLACEM 9472
184479
12/15/97
12/15/97
$198.75
$287.50
CERES ENVIRONMENTAL SERV
Wood chips
20977
TREES
` *>
$486.25*
CERES ENVIRONMENTAL SERV
Wood waste disposal
21012
& MAINTE
TREES & MAINTE
PLANT & TREES 7215
RUBBISH
REMOVA
184480
12/15/97
12/15/97
$630.00
$168.00
CHAOUCH, HABIB
CHAOUCH, HABIB
Soccer ref 42 games
120597
GOLF DOME
PERS SERVICES
< *'
$798.00*
Ref adm 420 games
120597
GOLF DOME
PERS SERVICES
184481
*>
12/15/97
$145.16
CHEMSEARCH
Aersol
`
$145.16*
B0184777
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES 9296
184482
` *>
12/15/97
$54.00
$54.00*
CITY OF BLOOMINGTON
Printin g- Police
120897
POLICE DEPT.
G
PRINTING
184483
12/15/97
12/15/97
$166.66
$166.67
CITY OF EDINA /CENTENNIAL
CITY OF EDINA /CENTENNIAL
Li ad
Liq q ad
1552
LIQUOR 50TH ST
ADVERT OTHER
` *>
12/15/97
$166.67
CITY OF EDINA /CENTENNIAL
Li ad
q
1552
LIQUOR YORK GE
ADVERT OTHER
$500.00*
1552
VERNON SELLING
ADVERT OTHER
184484
` *>
12/15/97
$108.00
$108.00*
CITY OF RICHFIELD
Printing - Police
120897
POLICE DEPT. G
PRINTING
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
11- DEC -1997 (11:59)
page 6
CHECK NO
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
184485
12/15/97
$25.56
City Wide Window Service
Window clean
107884
YORK OCCUPANCY
CONTR REPAIRS
12/15/97
$15.71
City Wide Window Service
Window clean
107885
VERNON OCCUPAN
CONTR REPAIRS
12/15/97
$15.71
City Wide Window Service
Window clean
107886
50TH ST OCCUPA
CONTR REPAIRS
< *>
$56.98*
184486
12/15/97
$229.75
CLEAN -FLO LAB
Aeration forIndinahea
8002
AQUATIC WEEDS
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$229.75*
184487
12/15/97
$42.59
COMPUTER CITY ACCOUNT RE
Anti virus software
124258
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
9208
12/15/97
$100.11
COMPUTER CITY ACCOUNT RE
Modem software Adm
124258
ADMINISTRATION
GENERAL SUPPLI
12/15/97
$627.07
COMPUTER CITY ACCOUNT RE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
124258
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$769.77*
184488
12/15/97
$247.38
CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS
Gloves
459233
PUMP & LIFT ST
PAINT
9139
12/15/97
$230.88
CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS
CL gloves
472989
ED BUILDING &
GENERAL SUPPLI
9353
12/15/97
$55.94
CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS
Aspirin
472989
GENERAL MAINT
SAFETY EQUIPME
9353
12/15/97
$170.94
CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS
Brown gloves
477396
GENERAL MAINT
SAFETY EQUIPME
9565
12/15/97
$85.08
CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS
Chore gloves
478747
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
9573
12/15/97
$221.16
CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS
Coveralls
481462
GENERAL MAINT
SAFETY EQUIPME
9584
< *>
$1,011.38*
184489
12/15/97
$130.00
Construction Education F
Cont ed
120597
TRAINING
CONF & SCHOOLS
< *>
$130.00*
184490
12/15/97
$128.00
Construction Market Data
Ad for bid
CB5297
ADMINISTRATION
ADVERTISING LE
< *>
$128.00*
184491
12/15/97
$78.00
CONTINENTAL CLAY CO
COST OF GOODS SOLD
028337
ART SUPPLY GIF
COST OF GD SOL
9297
< *>
$78.00*
184492
12/15/97
$59.37
COPY EQUIPMENT INC.
Roll file
0075075
ENGINEERING GE
GENERAL SUPPLI
9897
< *>
$59.37*
184493
12/15/97
$8.63
Corporate Express Delive
Courier
73049
ADMINISTRATION
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$8.63*
184494
12/15/97
$325.00
Craig, Wayne
Ozalid maint agreemen
112597
ENGINEERING GE
BLUE PRINTING
9888
< *>
$325.00*
184495
12/15/97
$1,386.67
CRIMMINS MD, TIMOTHY J
Medical service
DEC 97
FIRE DEPT. GEN
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$1,386.67*
184496
12/15/97
$267.48
Curtis 1000
PRINTING
15510001
POLICE DEPT. G
PRINTING
< *>
$267.48*
184497
12/15/97
$2,005.05
D'Amico & Sons
Refund
102997
GENERAL FD PRO
LIQUOR LICENSE
< *>
$2,005.05*
184498
12/15/97
$1,134.19
Dahlheimer Distributing
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
95878
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
< *>
$1,134.19*
184499
12/15/97
$185.96
DATREK PROFESSIONAL BAGS
COST OF GOODS - PRO S
277072
PRO SHOP
COST OF GDS -PR
4533
< *>
$185.96*
184500
12/15/97
$2,730.66
DAVIES WATER EQUIPMENT
Repair clamps
91278
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPLI
9174
1
COUNCIL CHL REGISTER
-�-1997 (11:59)
CHECK NO DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
page 7
---------------------
184500 12/1S/97
- --------------------------
$110.48
__________
DAVIES WATER EQUIPMENT
----
Hydrant
INVOICE
-9170-----------
PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM
------ -- - - - --- _______
' *>
$2,841.14*
wrench for
ri 91703
SKATING RINK M GENERAL SUPPLI 9822
184501
12/15/97
12/15/97
$545.40
$1,071.62
DAY DISTRIBUTING
DAY DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS SOLD
BE 21158
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
12/15/97
$1.00
DAY DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS SOLD
COST OF GOODS
BE 21411
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
12/15/97
12/15/97
$909.50
DAY DISTRIBUTING
SOLD
COST OF GOODS SOLD
BE 2144.
BE 0002
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
12/15/97
$12.20
$1,084.77
DAY DISTRIBUTING
DAY DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS SOLD
BE 2
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
VERNON SELLING CST OF
12/15/97
$1,478.10
DAY DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS SOLD
COST OF
BE 21631
GDS BEE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE
12/15/97
12/15/97
$1,823.60
DAY DISTRIBUTING
GOODS SOLD
COST OF GOODS SOLD
BE 21616
BE 21985
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
12/15/97
$210.00
$2,452.20
DAY DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS SOLD
BE 21987
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
YORK
` *>
$9,588.39*
DAY DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS SOLD
BE 21988
SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
YORK SELLING CST
OF GDS BEE
184502
` *>
12/15/97
$127.26
$127.26*
DC SALES COMPANY INC
Repair arts
P P
630349
BUILDING MAINT
REPAIR PARTS 9336
184503
` *>
12/15/97
$250.00
$250.00*
Dean's Tank Inc
Fuel oil tank removal 120597
PUBLIC HEALTH
PROF SERVICES
184504
` *>
12/15/97
$4,000.00
Deckas, Chuck
Reimburse
$4,000.00*
120897
GEN£RAL(BILLIN PROF SERVICES
184505
` *>
12/15/97
$9.35
DELEGARD TOOL CO.
Toole
$9.35*
108431
EQUIPMENT OPER TOOLS 9720
184506
` *>
12/15/97
$196.43
$196.43*
DENNYS 5th AV BAKERY
COST OF GOODS SOLD
113097
GRILL
COST OF GD SOL 3951
184507
` *>
12/15/97
$64.98
$64.98*
DIAMOND ART & CRAFT DIST
COST OF GOODS SOLD
167520
ART
SUPPLY GIF COST OF GD SOL 9634
18 *508
12/15/97
$525.93
$525.93*
Dictaphone Corporation
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
S241703
POLICE
DEPT. G EQUIP MAINT
184509
` *>
12/15/97
$297.00
DON BETZEN GOLF CO
COST OF GOODS SOLD
$297.00*
6606
FRED RICHARDS COST OF GD SOL 8581
184510
12/15/97
$27.50
DONCAVAGE, JACKIE E
Reimbursment
$27.50*
112697
PARK ADMIN. CONF & SCHOOLS
184511
` *>
12/15/97
$11,773.71
DORSEY & WHITNEY
Legal
$11,773.71*
585420
LEGAL SERVICES PRO SVC - LEGA
18 *512
12/15/97
$237.50
DVORAK, MARY
Art work sold
$237.50*
120897
ART CNTR PROG DONATIONS
184513
*>
12/15/97
$24.80
E -Z -GO TEXTRON
Golf car
`
$24.80*
P arts
0515103
GOLF CARS REPAIR PARTS 9757
184515
12/15/97
12/15/97'
$627.00
$594.15
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 35844
50TH ST SELLIN CST
12/15/97
$652.19
EAGLE WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 37137
OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
12/15/97
$342.25
EAGLE WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 37138
COST OF GOODS
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
SOLD WI
38282
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
11- DEC -1997
(11:59)
page 8
CHECK NO
-----------------------------------_-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT.
PO NUM
184515
12/15/97
$684.50
EAGLE WINE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
38,284
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WINE
12/15/97
$479.15
EAGLE WINE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
38286
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WINE
12/15/97
$80.45
EAGLE WINE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
39812
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WINE
12/15/97
$272.96
EAGLE WINE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
39814
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WINE
12/15/97
$343.90
EAGLE WINE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
39817
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WINE
12/15/97
$641.75
EAGLE WINE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
39819
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WINE
12/15/97
$21.02
EAGLE WINE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
MI
39820
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GDS
MIX
12/15/97
$203.43
EAGLE WINE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
41051
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WINE
12/15/97
$648.10
EAGLE WINE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
41055
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WINE
12/15/97
$681.36
EAGLE WINE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
41056
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WINE
12/15/97
- $98.94
EAGLE WINE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
76114
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD
LIQU
12/15/97
- $85.27
EAGLE WINE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
76115
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WINE
12/15/97
- $105.58
EAGLE WINE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
76123
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
LIQU
12/15/97
- $78.00
EAGLE WINE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
76177
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WINE
12/15/97
$365.75
EAGLE WINE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
44125
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WINE
12/15/97
$154.56
EAGLE WINE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
44126
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WINE
12/15/97
$60.45
EAGLE WINE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
44135
VERNON SELLING
CST.OF
GD
WINE
12/15/97
$253.47
EAGLE WINE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
44136
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WINE
12/15/97
$180.35
EAGLE WINE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
44143
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WINE
12/15/97
$695.69
EAGLE WINE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
44144
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WINE
< *>
$7,614.69*
i
184516
12/15/97
$128.44
EARL F. ANDERSON
Sign
for Braemar Aren
5563
STREET NAME SI
SIGNS & POSTS 9352
< *>
$128.44*
184518
12/15/97
$73.00
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
BE
015130
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GDS
BEE
12/15/97
$17.20
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
MI
230049
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GDS
MIX
12/15/97
$1,620.85
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
BE
230050
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GDS
BEE
12/15/97
$3,953.85
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
BE
230068
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GDS
-BEE
12/15/97
$178.00
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST
OF
GOODS,SOLD
BE
231214
50TH ST- SELLIN
CST
OF
GDS
BEE
12/15/97
$178.00
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
BE
231218
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GDS
BEE
12/15/97
$4,036.05
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
BE
232414
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GDS
BEE
12/15/97
$23.40
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
MI
233543
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GDS
MIX
12/15/97
$2,986.35
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
BE
233544
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GDS
BEE
12/15/97
$1,812.70
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
BE
733542
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GDS
BEE
12/15/97
$1,155.45
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
BE
233763
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GDS
BEE
12/15/97
$5,721.65
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
235545
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GDS
BEE
12/15/97
$2,904.25
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST
OF
GOODS
.BE
SOLD
BE
235546
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GDS
BEE
< *>
$24,660.75*
184519
12/15/97
$116.94
ECOLAB PEST ELIMINATION
Pest
control
5070941
ED BUILDING &
SVC
CONTR EQUI
12/15/97
$99.15
ECOLAB PEST ELIMINATION
Pest
elimination
5070947
ED BUILDING &
SVC
CONTR EQUI
< *>
$216.09*
184520
12/15/97
$2.15
Edina Cleaners
Sales
tax
94025
ED BUILDING &
LAUNDRY
12/15/97
$33.00
Edina Cleaners
LAUNDRY
94841
ED BUILDING &
LAUNDRY
< *>
$35.15*
184521
12/15/97
$77.00
EDMUNDS, LIZ
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
MI
111997
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GDS
MIX
< *>
$77.00*
184522
12/15/97
$25.19
ELLIS, LORETTA KANN
Art work sold
120497
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
< *>
$25.19*
184523
12/15/97
$300.00
EMPLOYEES CLUB
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
DECEMBER
CONTINGENCIES
GENERAL SUPPLI
COUNCIL Ch, REGISTER
11 -SEC -1997 (11:59)
CHECK NO DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
page 9
--- ----
--- --- - - - - -
---
-- --- --- ----
--------------- ------------------------------
INVOICE
PROGRAM OBJECT NUM---
*�
$300.00*
- --------- -
184524
12/15/97
$4,300.00
Endersen, William
Prof
` >
$4,300.00*
sry
120197
GENERAL STORM PROF SERVICES
184525
12/15/97
12/15/97
$59.48
$105.00
FARBER, DIANE
FARBER, DIANE
Art work sold
120497
ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER
,C*:,
$164.48*
Art work sold
120897
ART CNTR PROG DONATIONS
184526
12/15/97
12/15/97
$817.82
$2,099.30
FISCHER AGGREGATES INC
FISCHER AGGREGATES INC
SAND GRAVEL & ROCK
5725
SNOW & ICE REM SAND,GRVL & RO
12/15/97
12/15/97
$2,295.96
FISCHER AGGREGATES INC
SAND GRAVEL & ROCK
Metro seal
5726
5796
SNOW & ICE REM SAND,GRVL & RO
` *'
$395.35
$5,608.43*
FISCHER AGGREGATES INC
Concrete sand
12872
SNOW & ICE REM SAND,GRVL & RO
SNOW &
ICE REM SAND,GRVL & RO
184527
` *'
12/15/97
$365.69
$365.69*
FITZCO INC
GENERAL SUPPLIES
13641
POLICE DEPT.
G GENERAL SUPPLI 9930
184528
` *'
12/15/97
$58.50
FLEMING JOHN
Art work sold
$58.50*
120497
ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER
184529
12/15/97
12/15/97
$184.87
$9.11
FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY
FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY
ALARM SERVICE
File
ALARM SERVICE
` *'
$193.98*
cabinet lock
473687
CITY HALLCGENE GENERAL SUPPLI
184530
12/15/97
$49.05
FOOT -JOY
` *'
12/15/97
$16.18
FOOT -JOY
COST OF GOODS - PRO S
COST OF GOODS - PRO
5332963
PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR
$65.23*
S
5347023
PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR
184531
12/15/97
$74.00
$74.00 *
Forbord, Larry
Skating class refund
120897
ARENA BLDG
`
/GRO PRO SVC OTHER
184532
` *'
12/15/97
$75.00
FREEWAY RADIATOR SERVICE
Radiator
$75.00*
21679
EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 9544
184533
` *'
12/15/97
$42.58
Freund, Jeff
Uniform pants reim
$42.58*
120297
ED BUILDING & LAUNDRY
184534
` *'
12/15/97
$2,948.80
$2,948.80*
Friedges Landscaping Inc
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
97 -10PK
PKBOND
CIP EQUIP REPLACEM
184535
12/15/97
$195.10
FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
$195.10*
111597
CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE
184536
12/15/97
12/15/97
$76.25
$66.68
G & K DIRECT PURCHASE
G & K DIRECT
Clothing
38855
GENERAL MAINT
` *'
$142.93*
PURCHASE
Coverals
38962
LAUNDRY
GENERAL MAINT SAFETY EQUIPME
184537
12/15/97
12/15/97
$3,289.80
$519.00
G.E. Capital
G.E. Capital
En dept hardware
P
154315
ENGINEERING GE EQUIP REPLACEM
` *'
$3,808.80*
Eng
g dept hardware
170787
102697
ENGINEERING GE EQUIP REPLACEM 9626
184538
` *'
12/15/97
$218.92
GALL'S INC
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
$218.92*
51822405
POLICE DEPT. G UNIF ALLOW 9279
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
11 -IJEC -1997
(11:59)
page 10
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
-----------------------------
' 184539
12/15/97
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$525.00
GEISHEKER, PATRICIA
Prof sery AC
120897
ART CENTER.ADM
PROF SERVICES
-------- ----
12/15/97
$292.50
GEISHEKER, PATRICIA
Art work sold
120897
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
< *>
$817.50*
184540
12/15/97
$480.00
GENERAL SPORTS
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
46898
ARENA BLDG /GRO
GENERAL SUPPLI
9215
< *>
$480.00*
184541
12/15/97
$125.00
GOLFCRAFT
COST OF
GOODS
- PRO S
10414
PRO SHOP
COST OF GDS -PR
3936
< *>
$125.00*
184542
12/15/97
$45.92
GOODMAN, NANCY
Art work sold
120497
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
< *>
$45.92*
184543
12/15/97
$50.00
GOPHER CASH REGISTER
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
16437
ARENA BLDG /GRO
GENERAL SUPPLI
1088
< *>
'$50.00*
184544
12/15/97
$250.25
GOPHER.STATE 1 CALL
Gopher
one
7100248.
SUPERV. & OVRH
GOPHER STATE
< *>
$250.25*
184545
12/15/97
$30.00
Graham, Onnalee
Class refund
120297
ART CNTR PROG
REGISTRATION F
< *>
$30.00*
184546
12/15/97
$11.62
GRAINGER
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
49511399
BUILDINGS
GENERAL SUPPLI
9329
12/15/97
$149.94
GRAINGER
Motor
68943454
BUILDINGS
GENERAL SUPPLI
9329
12/15/97
$81.49
GRAINGER
REPAIR PARTS
28095241
GOLF DOME
REPAIR PARTS
9603
12/15/97
$114.65
GRAINGER
ACCESSORIES
49512906
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
9578
12/15/97
$41.56
GRAINGER
REPAIR PARTS
49876396
GOLF DOME
REPAIR PARTS
9603
12/15/97
$84.08
GRAINGER
Council
chamber light
49513469
CITY HALL GENE
REPAIR PARTS
9693
< *>
$483.34*
184547
12/15/97
$115.00
Grand Pere Wines Inc
COST OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
5044
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
12/15/97
$80.00
Grand Pere Wines Inc
COST OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
5052
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
< *>
$195.00*
184548
12/15/97
$314.99
GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC
COST OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
16850
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
12/15/97
$232.00
GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC
COST OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
16878
SOTH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
12/15/97
$555.00
GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC
COST OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
16879
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
12/15/97
$217.00
GRAPE BEGINNINGS .INC
COST OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
112697
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
12/15/97
$485.00
GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC
COST OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
16950
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
< *>
$1-,803.99*
184549
12/15/97
$958.70
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO.
Arena
10492739
ARENA BLDG /GRO
GENERAL SUPPLI
9325
12/15/97
$187.98
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO.
electrical
10493191
CITY HALL GENE
REPAIR PARTS
9359
< *>
$1,146.68*
184552
12/15/97
$1,356.43
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
COST OF
GOODS.SOLD
LI
37133
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQU
12/15/97
$803.32
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
COST OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
37136
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQU
12/15/97
$4,137.61
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
COST OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
37140
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
12/15/97
$47.01
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
COST OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
37143
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
12/15/97
$4,114.66
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
COST OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
37144
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
12/15/97
$470.00
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
COST OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
39241
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQU
12/15/97
$41.79
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
COST OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
39242
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQU
12/15/97
$436.93
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
COST OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
41052
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQU
12/15/97
$562.80
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
COST OF
GOODS
SOLD'LI
41053
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQU
12/15/97
$1,541.59
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
COST OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
41059
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
dOUNCIL CHi REGISTER 11 -'-1997 (11:59)
CHECK NO
----------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VERNON SELLING
VENDOR
HONEYWELL INC
HONEYWELL INC
12/97 -3/98 Maint
12/97 -3/98 Maint
DESCRIPTION
GOLF DOME
INVOICE
HONEYWELL INC
12/97 -3/98 Maint
page 11
ARENA ADMINIST
PROF SERVICES
--- ------
- - - - --
------------------------
SVC CONTR EQUI
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
184552
12/15/97
12/15/97
$1,027.82
$1,136.91
GRIGGS
GRIGGS
COOPER
&
CO.
COST
OF
GOODS
-----
SOLD
-----------------
LI
41062
--- - - - - -- -
YORK SELLING
- - ---
CST
OF
GD
-- ___
12/15/97
$64.56
GRIGGS
COOPER
COOPER
&
&
CO.
CO.
COST
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
41063
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD
LIQU
LIQU
12/15/97
$2,763.28
GRIGGS
COOPER
&
CO.
COST
OF
OF
GOODS
GOODS
SOLD
LI
41064
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD
LIQU
12/15/97
$1,262.00
GRIGGS
COOPER
&
CO.
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
SOLD
LI
LI
41065
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD
LIQU
12/15/97
12/15/97
$326.57
GRIGGS
COOPER
&
CO.
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
44128
44131
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH
CST
OF
GD
LIQU
12/15/97
$58.80
$1,847.22
GRIGGS
COOPER
&
CO.
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
MI
44132
ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD LIQU
12/15/97
$240.15
GRIGGS
GRIGGS
COOPER
COOPER
&
&
CO.
CO.
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
44138
VERNON SELLING
CST
CST
OF
OF
GDS
GD
MIX
LIQU
12/15/97
$1,368.47
GRIGGS
COOPER
&
CO.
COST
COST
OF
OF
GOODS
SOLD
MI
44140
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GDS MIX
12/15/97
$34.08
GRIGGS
COOPER
&
CO.
COST
OF
GOODS
GOODS
SOLD
LI
44141
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD
LIQU
12/15/97
12/15/97
$3,569.46
GRIGGS
COOPER
&
CO.
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
SOLD
LI
LI
44145
44146
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD
LIQU
12/15/97
$94.21
$2,931.05
GRIGGS
GRIGGS
COOPER
&
CO.
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
44150
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD
LIQU
*>
12/15/97
$114.19
GRIGGS
COOPER
COOPER
&
&
CO.
CO.
COST
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
44151
YORK SELLING
CST
CST
OF
OF
GD
GD
LIQU
LIQU
<
$30,350.91*
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
44152
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD
LIQU
184553
12/15/97
$94.25
GRIMSBY, NANCY
Art work
sold
$94.25*
120997
ART CNTR PROG
SALES
OTHER
184554
*>
12/15/97
$135.00
HARTLIEB, CECEILE
Prof
AC
<
$135.00*
sery
120897
ART CENTER ADM
PROF
SERVICES
184555
< *>
12/15/97
$40.00
$40.00*
HAYWA,
PHYLLIS
Program Edinborough
112497
E D ADMINISTRAT
PRO
SVC
OTHER
184556 12/15/97
184557 12/15/97
184558 12/15/97
184559 12/15/97
184560 12/15/97
184561 12/15/97
184562 12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
184563 12/15/97
12/15/97
184564 12/15/97
$331.73* HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF COURT CHARGES
111997 LEGAL SERVICES COURT CHARGES
$1,106.16 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURE Postal verification 112497 ELECTION
$1,106.16* POSTAGE
$8,875.00 Hennepin County Repay 2nd mort /6304 H 120497 CDBG PROG OTHER REVENUE
$8,875.00*
$210.00 Hergott, Gail Art work sold
$210.00* 120897 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER
$100.00 HOFFMAN, WILLIAM Police service DEB 1997 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES
$100.00*
$25.80
$25.80*
$6,533.00
$13,327.00
$6,272.50
$26,132.50*
$239.63
$396.50
$636.13*
$100.01
$100.01*
Home Juice
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MI 89414
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
HONEYWELL INC
HONEYWELL INC
12/97 -3/98 Maint
12/97 -3/98 Maint
762PT536
GOLF DOME
SVC CONTR EQUI
HONEYWELL INC
12/97 -3/98 Maint
762PT536
762PT536
ARENA ADMINIST
PROF SERVICES
ED BUILDING &
SVC CONTR EQUI
Honsa Lighting
Honsa Lighting
HOOFNAGLE, LYLE
Bulbs
Bulbs
GENERAL SUPPLIES
153520 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 9653
153615 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 9656
120897 MEDIA LAB GENERAL SUPPLI
COUNCIL
CHEt-x REGISTER
11 -,jEC -1997 (11:59)
page 12
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
184565
12/15/97
$170.00
HOPKINS COMMUNITY EDUCAT
User meeting group
1425
CENT SVC GENER
CONF & SCHOOLS
< *>
$170.00*
184566
12/15/97
$76.86
HORWATH, TOM
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
120897
TREES & MAINTE
MILEAGE
< *>
$76.86*
184567
12/15/97
$36.00
Hospitality Minnesota
Food show
113097
PARK ADMIN.
DUES-& SUBSCRI
< *>
$36.00*
184568
12/15/97
$46.24
HUEBSCH
Rug cleaning
439306
ED BUILDING &
SVC CONTR EQUI
< *>
$46.24*
184569
12/15/97
$859.24
HYDRO SUPPLY CO
INVENTORY WATER METER
11986
UTILITY PROG
INVENTORY WATE
6388
12/15/97
$4,450.68
HYDRO SUPPLY CO
INVENTORY WATER METER
11987
UTILITY PROG
INVENTORY WATE
6388
< *>
$5,309.92*
184570
12/15/97
$220.46
IBM CORPORATION
Multi scv contract
P44HB324
CENT SVC GENER
SVC CONTR EQUI
< *>
$220.46*
184571
12/15/97
$1,859.49
IBM
Service contract Poli
112497.
POLICE DEPT. G
SVC CONTR EQUI
< *>
$1,859.49*
184572
12/15/97
$49.22
IKON CAPITAL
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
39150895
ART CENTER ADM
EQUIP RENTAL
< *>
$49.22*
184573
12/15/97
$42.48
Ikon Office Solutions.
Copies
996606
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
5258
12/15/97
$66.25
Ikon Office Solutions
Fax toner cartridge
26313A
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL SUPPLI
9936
< *>
$108.73*
184574
12/15/97
$411.10
INDEPENDENT BLACK DIRT C
Clay for pitching mou
112997
PKBOND CIP
EQUIP REPLACEM
< *>
$411.10*
184575
12/15/97
$650.00
INTERLACHEN TRAVEL
Cont Ed
073243
TRAINING FACIL
CONF & SCHOOLS
9941
< *>
$650.00*
184576
12/15/97
$1,930.00
IUOE LOCAL 49
Training
112197
TRAINING
CONF & SCHOOLS
8077
< *>
$1,930.00*
184577
12/15/97
$70.18
J -CRAFT INC
Light relay
20273
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES:
9536
12/15/97
$47.54
J -CRAFT INC
Repair kit
20306
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
9548
< *>
$117.72*
184578
12/15/97
$119.28
J.H. LARSON ELECTRICAL C
Electrical for'Golf D
40359280
GOLF DOME
REPAIR PARTS
9307
12/15/97
$122.38
J.H. LARSON ELECTRICAL C
50th & France
40380940
STREET REVOLVI
GENERAL SUPPLI
9563
12/15/97
$144.15
J.H. LARSON ELECTRICAL C
Elect supplies
40383220
ST LIGHTING OR
GENERAL SUPPLI
9572
< *>
$385.81*
184579
12/15/97
$160.00
J.L.,Schmitz & Sons
Gravel for AC
090597
PKBOND CIP
EQUIP REPLACEM
9179
12/15/97.
$360.00
J.L. Schmitz & Sons
Gravel for parks
090597
PKBOND CIP
EQUIP REPLACEM
9178
< *>
$520.00*
184580
12/15/97
$2,023.50
Jack McClard & Associate
Hyd jack /shop
103197
EQUIPMENT OPER
EQUIP REPLACEM
< *>
$2,023.50*
184581
12/15/97
$100.00
JAMES, WILLIAM F
Police service
DEC 1997
RESERVE PROGRA
PERS SERVICES
COUNCIL CHL REGISTER
11 -_..,C -1997 (11:59)
page 13
CHECK NO
DATE
------------------------------------
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
- - - - -- ------
-----------
OBJECT
PO NUM
$100.00*
- -- - ----------------------------
----------------------
184582
12/15/97
12/15/97
$79.82
$90.35
JERRY'S
JERRY'S
FOODS
FOODS
COST OF GOODS SOLD
120197
GRILL
COST OF GD SOL
12/15/97
$22.77
JERRY'S
FOODS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
120197
ART SUPPLY GIF
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$192.94*
120197
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
184583
12/15/97
12/15/97
$177.00
$240.69
JERRY'S
JERRY'S
PRINTING
PRINTING
PRINTING
A3456
ART CENTER ADM
PRINTING
< *>
$417.69*
TNT Budget copies
A3628
FINANCE
GENERAL SUPPLI
9756
184584
12/15/97
12/15/97
$139.08
$178.72
JIM HATCH SALES
JIM HATCH SALES
Strobe
8057
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
9374
< *>
$317.80*
Shovel
8110
GENERAL MAINT
TOOLS
9592
184585 12/15/97
12/15/97
184587 12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
184588 12/15/97
184589 12/15/97
184590 12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
$297.14 Johnson Wholesale Florio TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUB 29502
$486.07 Johnson Wholesale Florio TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUB 26770
$783.21*
-$6.15
$684.00
- $107.62
- $245.60
$21.89
$2,204.35
$1,737.47
$6,512.17
$2,796.65
$7,902.13
$3,736.27
$431.25
- $18.30
$1,121.20
$4,334.31
$3,729.37
$1,195.10
$5,559.36
$4,045.70
$475.00
$324.25
$5,706.17
$3,373.54
$2,340.22
$57,852.73*
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
JOHNSON WINE CO.
$32.00 Johnson, Lisa
$32.00*
$237.50 JOHNSON, NAOMI
$237.50*
$41.90 JOHNSON, NAOMI
$92.06 JOHNSON, NAOMI
$34.93 JOHNSON, NAOMI
$168.89*
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 40747
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 771273
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 44750
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 45315
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 779018
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 779019
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 779020
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 779021
COST OF GOODS-SOLD WI 779022
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 779023
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 779024
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 779098
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 45821
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 779820
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 779821
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 780484
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 780832
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 780833
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 780834
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 780971
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 783570
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 783573
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 783574
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 783575
Class refund 111997
Art work sold 120897
Art work sold 120897
CRAFT SUPPLIES 120897
PRINTING 120897
ED BUILDING & TREES FLWR SHR 9674
ED BUILDING & TREES FLWR SHR 9660
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
ART CNTR PROG REGISTRATION F
ART CNTR PROG DONATIONS
ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER
ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES
ART CENTER ADM PRINTING
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
11 -llEC -1997 (11:59)
page 14
CHECK NO
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
184591.
12/15/97
$100.00
JOHNSON, WALTER
Police service
DEC 1997
RESERVE PROGRA
PERS SERVICES
< *>
$100.00*
. 184592
12/15/97
$47.45
Jonas, Lenore
Art work sold
120497
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
< *>
$47.45*
184593
12/15/97
$520.80
JORDAN BEVERAGE
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
43184
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
12/15/97
$520.80
JORDAN BEVERAGE
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
43288
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
< *>
$1,041.60*
184594
12/15/97
$959.45
JP FOODSERVICES
INC
COST OF GOODS SOLD-
120197
GRILL
COST OF GD SOL
12/15/97
$61.70
JP FOODSERVICES
INC
...CLEANING SUPPLIES
120197
GRILL
CLEANING SUPPL
12/15/97
$44.60
JP FOODSERVICES
INC
CLEANING SUPPLIES
120197
GRILL
CLEANING SUPPL
12/15/97
$248.92
JP FOODSERVICES
INC
COST OF GOODS SOLD
933060
POOL TRACK GRE
COST OF GD SOL
1092
< *>
$1,314.67*
184595
12/15/97
$11.50
JULIEN, DIANE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
112697
PW BUILDING
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$11:50*
184596
12/15/97
$21.45
JUSTUS LUMBER
Ice.arena
96992
ARENA BLDG /GRO
GENERAL SUPPLI
9187
12/15/97
$45..09
JUSTUS LUMBER
Lumber
98329
PKBOND CIP
EQUIP REPLACEM
9056
12/15/97
$234.04
JUSTUS LUMBER
Stakes
989
SNOW & ICE REM
GENERAL SUPPLI
9172
12/15/97
$49.19
JUSTUS LUMBER
LUMBER
4172
BUILDING MAINT
LUMBER
9556
12/15/97
$54.05
JUSTUS LUMBER
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
4382
MEDIA LAB CONS
CIP
9036
12/15/97
$41.54
JUSTUS LUMBER
LUMBER
4387
BUILDING MAINT
LUMBER
9561
12/15/97
$155.81
JUSTUS LUMBER
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
4432
MEDIA LAB CONS
CIP
9036
12/15/97
$4,491.13
JUSTUS LUMBER
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
4880
MEDIA LAB CONS
CIP
9036
12/15/97
$144.52
JUSTUS LUMBER
Lumber & bldg materia
5676
BUILDING MAINT
LUMBER
9691
12/15/97
$316.64
JUSTUS LUMBER
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
5718
MEDIA LAB CONS
CIP
9036
12/15/97
$45.09
JUSTUS LUMBER
Lumber
6307
BUILDING MAINT
LUMBER
9709
12/15/97
$8,871.92
JUSTUS LUMBER
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
6170
MEDIA LAB CONS
CIP
9036
< *>
$14,470.47*
184597
12/15/97
$728.10
Kaman Induntrial
Technol
Equip r.opair. parts
7.1.52707
MAINT OF LOURS
REPAIR PARTS
9604
< *>
$728.10*
184598
12/15/97
$9.00
Kampa, Stephanie
Class refund
111997
ART CNTR PROG
REGISTRATION F
< *>
$9.00*
184599
12/15/97
$20.00
Kath, Gerry
Swimnastic refund
120197
GENERAL FD PRO
REGISTRATION F
< *>
$20.00*
184600
12/15/97
$236.55
KATTREH, ANN
GENERAL SUPPLIES
120597
ED BUILDING &
GENERAL SUPPLI
12/15/97
$16.33
KATTREH, ANN
POSTAGE
120597
ED ADMINISTRAT
POSTAGE
12/15/97
$27.65
KATTREH, ANN
TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUB
120597
ED BUILDING &
TREES FLWR SHR
< *>
$280.53*
184601
12/15/97
$27.50
KEPRIOS, JOHN
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
112197
PARK ADMIN.
DUES & SUBSCRI
< *>
$27.50*
184603
12/15/97
$1,032.80
Kiwi Kai Imports
Inc
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI
83795
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
12/15/97
$228.80
Kiwi Kai Imports
Inc
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
83796
50TH ST.SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
12/15/97
$1,562.20
Kiwi Kai Imports
Inc
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
83920
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
12/15/97
$27.95
Kiwi Kai'Imports
Inc
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
83921
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
12/15/97
$816.00
Kiwi Kai Imports
Inc
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
83922
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
COUNCIL
CH6 REGISTER
11 --_� -1997 (11:59)
CHECK NO
- -
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
page 15
PROGRAM
- --
-----------------------------------p---------------------------------
OBJECT PO NUM
184603
12/15/97
12/15/97
$162.40
$27.95
Kiwi Kai Imports Inc
Kiwi Kai
COST OF GOODS SOLD
--------------------------
WI 83923
--------------------------
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
12/15/97
- $66.80
Imports Inc
Kiwi Kai Imports Inc
COST OF GOODS SOLD
COST OF
MI 83924
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX
12/15/97
$978.20
Kiwi Kai Imports Inc
GOODS SOLD
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI CM1121
WI
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
12/15/97
$735.15
Kiwi Kai Imports Inc
COST OF GOODS SOLD
84162
WI 84163
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
50TH
12/15/97
12/15/97
$154.40
Kiwi Kai Imports Inc
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI 84164
ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST
12/15/97
$83.80
$1,347.60
Kiwi Kai Imports Inc
Kiwi Kai Imports Inc
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI 84170
OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
12/15/97
- $54.80
Kiwi Kai Imports Inc
COST OF GOODS SOLD
COST
WI 84224
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
12/15/97
- $10.00
Kiwi Kai Imports Inc
OF GOODS SOLD
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI 1126 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
WI 1126/836 50TH
12/15/97
12/15/97
$80.80
$1,557.45
Kiwi Kai Imports Inc
Kiwi Kai
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI 84388
ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
12/15/97
$587.10
Imports Inc
Kiwi Kai Imports Inc
COST OF GOODS SOLD
COST OF
WI 84509
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
12/15/97
$1,524.10
Kiwi Kai Imports Inc
GOODS SOLD
COST OF
WI 84510
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
12/15/97
$211.20
Kiwi Kai Imports Inc
GOODS SOLD
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI 84511
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
*>
12/15/97
$78.80
Kiwi Kai Imports Inc
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI 84512
WI
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
<
$11,065.10*
84572
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
184604
12/15/97
12/15/97
$45.64
$556.29
KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT
KNOX
Material
296227
GENERAL MAINT TOOLS
12/15/97
$978.39
COMMERCIAL CREDIT
KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT
Poste
Stakes
187620
SNOW & ICE REM GENERAL SUPPLI 9334
12/15/97
$458.21
KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT
Drill bit
300200
SNOW & ICE REM GENERAL SUPPLI 9382
12/15/97
12/15/97
$438.03
KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT
Hardware
1806674
1808575
STREET NAME SI GENERAL SUPPLI 9344
EQUIPMENT OPER
<*'
$115.83
$2,592.39*
KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT
Lumber
302898
ACCESSORIES 9342
GOLF DOME REPAIR
PARTS 9803
184605
<''
12/15/97
$39.00
$39.00*
KONTERS, VIK
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 112497
POLICE DEPT. G CONF
& SCHOOLS
184606
12/15/97
12/15/97
$680.55
$1,672.40
KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO
KUETHER DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS SOLD
BE 197595
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE
12/15/97
$115.90
CO
KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO
COST OF GOODS SOLD
COST OF GOODS
BE 197713
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
12/15/97
$43.35
KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO
SOLD
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MI 197714
MI
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
12/15/97
$426.10
KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO
198128
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX
12/15/97
$130.35
KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO
198129
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE
*'
12/15/97
$2,328.70
KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO
198724
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
<
$5,397.35*
198725
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
184607
` *'
12/15/97
$35.50
$35.50*
KUYPER, SCOTT
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 112497
POLICE DEPT. G CONF
& SCHOOLS
184608
12/15/97
12/15/97
$97.99
$464.39
LANO EQUIPMENT
LANO EQUIPMENT
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
R93693
GENERAL MAINT EQUIP RENTAL 9183
` *'
$562.38*
Parts
94005
DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLI 8952
184609
12/15/97
12/15/97
$181.01
$381.29
LAWSON PRODUCTS INC.
LAWSON PRODUCTS INC.
Ty -rape
1806673
GENERAL MAINT TOOLS
<*'
$562.30*
Nuts & bolts
1816502
ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 9677
184610
12/15/97
12/15/97
$44.18
$29.61
LEEF BROS. INC.
LEEF BROS. INC.
LAUNDRY
113097/A
ART CENTER BLD LAUNDRY
` *'
$73.79*
LAUNDRY
123097
MAINT OF COURS LAUNDRY
184611
` *'
12/15/97
$1,890.80
LEITNER COMPANY
SOD & BLACK DIRT
120197
RANGE
$1,890.80*
SOD & DIRT 9605
COUNCIL
CHEC& REGISTER
11 -DEC -1997 (11:59)
page 16
CHECK NO
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT PO NUM
184612
12/15/97
$74.00
Lemmer, Bea
Skating class refund
120897
ARENA BLDG /GRO
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$74.00*
184613
12/15/97
$49.31
LINHOFF
GENERAL SUPPLIES
38665
SPECIAL ACTIVI
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$49.31*
184614
12/15/97
$36.17
LUND, KAREN
Art work sold
120497
ART CNTR PROG 'SALES
OTHER
< *>
$36.17*
184615
12/15/97
$27.79
LYMAN, MARTHA
Art work sold
120497
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
< *>
$27.79*
184616
12/15/97
$18.00
M. SHANKEN COMMUNICATION
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
102997
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
< *>
$18.00*
184617 12/15/97
184618 12/15/97
184619 12/15/97
184620 12/15/97
184621 12/15/97
184622 12/15/97
12/15/97
184624 12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
$195.00 M.I.L.E.
$195.00*
$220.00 M.R.P.A.
$220.00*
$103.15 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC.
$103.15*
$97.00
$97.00*
$200.00
$200.00*
$15.09
$68.04
$83.13*
$30.00
$1,320.50
$48.55
$1,007.05
$22.00
$92.00
$5,253.90
$1,413.90
$328.05
$2,019.00
$54.95
$80.20
- $73.60
$25.60
$235.00
$1,884.65
$3,771.25
$8.60
$16.25
$73.10
$2,204.10
MacDonald, Scott
Mackerman, Vicky
MANGEN, DEB
MANGEN, DEB
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
'MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
Property tax appeals 120197 ASSESSING CONF & SCHOOLS
Registration fee 112597 EDINA ATHLETIC PROF SERVICES
Guard end 29710340 E6UIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 9387
Skating class refund 120897 ARENA BLDG /GRO PRO SVC OTHER
Prof sery AC 120897 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES
MEETING EXPENSE 120397 ADMINISTRATION MEETING EXPENS
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 120397 ADMINISTRATION MILEAGE
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 709507
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 712237
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 712238
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 712253
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 712254
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 712255
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 712261
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 712664
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 712665
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 712671
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 712672
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 712673
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 371
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 714040
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 714041
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 714134
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 714408
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 714409
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 714410
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 714411
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 716640
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
COUNCIL
CHL REGISTER
11 -. _ -1997 (11:59)
CHECK NO DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
page 17
-- -----
----- ---- -- - - - -
- -- -- - - - - -- -- ---- ------
-- -
- - - - -- ---------------------
OBJECT
PO NUM
<*>
$19,815.05*
----------------
----------------------------
184625
< *>
12/15/97
$628.30
$628.30*
MARSHALL & SWIFT
DATA PROCESSING
112597
CENT SVC GENER DATA PROCESSIN
184626
12/15/97.
12/15/97
$110:00
$115.00
Matrix Communications In
Matrix Communications In
Headset adp
Phone
29848
COMMUNICATIONS GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$225.00*
moving
0029968
ENGINEERING GE GENERAL SUPPLI
184627
< *>
12/15/97
$304.50
$304.50*
MCGARVEY /SUPERIOR COFFEE COST OF GOODS SOLD
7600230
GRILL COST OF
GD SOL
3958
184628
< *>
12/15/97
$55.50
$55.50*
Mclaughlin, Amy
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
120897
GOLF ADMINISTR MILEAGE
184629
12/15/97
$220.09
MCNEILUS STEEL
Steel
12/15/97
$54.96
MCNEILUS STEEL
Steel
188189
EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES
9166
< *>
$275.05*
188266
EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES
9177
184630
< *>
12/15/97
$119.00
$119.00*
McVeety, Val
Class refund
111997
ART CNTR PROG REGISTRATION F
184631
12/15/97
12/15/97
$405.00
$250.00
Medical Priority
Medical Priority
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
CONFERENCES
24320
POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS
9464
* >
`
$655.00*
& SCHOOLS
24339
POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS
9964
184632
< *>
12/15/97
$14,501.00
$14,501.00*
Meisinger Construction C
Aquatic center constr
12
PKBOND CIP EQUIP REPLACEM
184633
12/15/97
$192.47
MENARDS * ACCT 430240251
Lumber
12/15/97
$261.78
MENARDS * ACCT #30240251
Lumber
91272
GOLF DOME REPAIR PARTS
9617
< *>
$454.25*
92738
GOLF DOME REPAIR PARTS
9758
184634
12/15/97
$100.00
MERFELD, BURT
Police
< *>
$100.00*
service
DEC 1997
RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES
184635
12/15/97
12/15/97
$40.47
$135.25
MERIT SUPPLY
MERIT SUPPLY
Drum pump
46641
EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES
9327
12/15/97
12/15/97
$165.82
MERIT SUPPLY
Polyliners
CLEANING SUPPLIES
46654
46726
PW BUILDING CLEANING SUPPL
PW BUILDING
9356
12/15/97
$993.64
$209.69
MERIT SUPPLY
MERIT SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
46807
CLEANING SUPPL
ARENA BLDG /GRO CLEANING SUPPL
9571
9887
12/15/97
$633.37
MERIT SUPPLY
Towels, glass cleaner
CLEANING SUPPLIES
46811
ED BUILDING & CLEANING SUPPL
9655
12/15/97
12/15/97
$8,258.60
MERIT SUPPLY
MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT
46833
46846
ED BUILDING & CLEANING SUPPL
ICE ARENA
9659
< *>
$962.76
$11,399.60*
MERIT SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
46862
PROG MACH. & EQUIP
ARENA BLDG /GRO CLEANING SUPPL
9667
9902
184636
12/15/97
12/15/97
$25.00
$243.64
MESSERLI & KRAMER
MESSERLI & KRAMER
Collect fees
112197
GENERAL FD PRO AMBULANCE FEES
< *>
$268.64*
MK Collect fees
112197.
GENERAL FD PRO AMBULANCE FEES
18 *637
` >
12/15/97
$100.00
$100.00*
Metro Volley Ball Offici
Officiatin g fees
112597
EDINA ATHLETIC PROF SERVICES
184638
< *>
12/15/97
$9,578.61
Micron Electronics Inc
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
1453395
POLICE DEPT.
$9,578.61*
G EQUIP REPLACEM
8723
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
11- DEC -1997 (11:59)
page 18
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
184639
12/15/97
$167.90
MID - CONTINENT BOTTLERS I
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
65993
VERNON SELLING
- - - - -- -------
CST OF GDS MIX
- - - - --
< *>
$167.90*
184640
12/15/97
$4,295.00
Mid -Metro Construction
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
18690
PKBOND CIP
EQUIP REPLACEM
9033
12/15/97
$4,295.00
Mid -Metro Construction
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
18690
PATHS & HARD S
PROF SERVICES
9033
< *>
$8,590.00*
184641
12/15/97
$88.50
MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
62108038
SOTH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MIX
12/15/97
$162.05
MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
62108103
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
12/15/97
$308.25
MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
62111131
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
12/15/97
$156.95
MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
61208052
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
< *>
$715.75*
184642
12/15/97
$53.25
MIDWEST WIRE & STEEL
Deer feed
,120565
DEER CONTROL-
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$53.25*
184643
12/15/97
$27.30
Mill City Printworks
Art work sold
120497
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
< *>
$27.30*
184644
12/15/97
$144.00
Miller, Suzanne
Overpayment ambulance
972439
GENERAL FD PRO
AMBULANCE-FEES
< *>
$144.00*
184645
12/15/97
$226.99
MINN COMM PAGING
Pager rental
22509612
FIRE DEPT. GEN
EQUIP RENTAL
< *>
$226.99*
184646
12/15/97
$885.00
MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN S
Service line repair
31206
DISTRIBUTION
CONTR REPAIRS
9853
< *>
$885.00*
184648
12/15/97
$1,374.70
MINNEGASCO
Service alterations
102297
PKBOND CIP
EQUIP REPLACEM
12/15/97
$1,579.63
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
112597
ARENA BLDG /GRO
HEAT
12/15/97
$872.60
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
121597
FIRE DEPT. GEN
HEAT
12/15/97
$747.45
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
121597
CITY HALL GENE
HEAT
12/15/97
$5,235.19
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
121597
PW BUILDING
HEAT
12/15/97
$1,499.34
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
121597
BUILDING MAINT
HEAT
12/15/97
$357.34
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
121597
ART CENTER BLD
HEAT
12/15/97
$627.90
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
121597
CLUB HOUSE
HEAT
12/15/97
$161.98
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
121597
MAINT OF COURS
HEAT
12/15/97
$6,096.11
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
121597
GOLF DOME
HEAT
12/15/97
$61.63
MINNEGASCO
HEAT.
121597
FRED RICHARDS
HEAT
12/15/97
$3,926.11
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
121597
ARENA BLDG /GRO
HEAT
12/15/97
$3,492.62
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
121597
ED BUILDING &
HEAT
12/15/97
$589.20
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
121597
PUMP & LIFT ST
HEAT
12/15/97
$2,•885.92
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
121597
DISTRIBUTION
HEAT
12/15/97
$52.01"
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
121597
50TH ST OCCUPA
HEAT
12/15/97
$163.06
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
121597
YORK OCCUPANCY
HEAT
12/15/97
$132.77
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
121597
VERNON OCCUPAN
HEAT
< *>
$29,855.56*
184649
12/15/97
$128.40
MINNESOTA CLAY USA
COST OF GOODS SOLD
31949
ART - SUPPLY GIF
COST OF GD SOL
9637
< *>
$128.40*
184650
12/15/97
$18,111.00
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF
Connect fee
111997.
WATER TREATMEN
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$18,111.00*
184651
12/15/97
$73.15
MINNESOTA ELEVATOR INC
Elevator sery
110332
ED BUILDING &
SVC CONTR EQUI
COUNCIL CFI REGISTER
11 -'-1997 (11:59)
CHECK NO uATE
--------------------=-
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR DESCRIPTION
page 19
` *'
-----------------
INVOICE
PROGRAM O JE
$73.15*------------------------------------------
----------------------CT -----
-PO -NUM
---------
184652 12/15/97
< *'
$80.00
Minnesota Foundation for Interpreter service
15808
$80.00*
ADAPTIVE RECRE PROF SERVICES
184653
` *'
12/15/97
$172.38
MINNESOTA GLOVE INC Gloves
$172.38*
9762
PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPLI
9697
184654
` *'
12/15/97
$250.00
MINNESOTA MEETINGS & EVE Adv
$250.00*
8162
CLUB HOUSE PROF SERVICES
184655
12/15/97
12/15/97
$104.40
MINNESOTA SUN PUBLICATIO Ad for bid
12/15/97
$30.00
$72.00
MINNESOTA SUN PUBLICATIO Hearin notice
Hearing
063991
063993
ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LE
12/15/97
$316.00
MINNESOTA SUN PUBLICATIO Ad forbid
63992
ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LE
` *'
$522.40*
MINNESOTA SUN PUBLICATIO ADVERTISING LEGAL
65516
ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LE
ADMINISTRATION
ADVERTISING LE
184656
` *'
12/15/97
$503.65
Mitchell /Repair Informat Renew al
$503.65*
103197
EQUIPMENT OPER DATA PROCESSIN
184657
` *'
12/15/97
$2,710.36
MTI DISTRIBUTING CO REPAIR PARTS
$2,710.36*
2197313
MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS
9668
184658
12/15/97
$231.74
MUNICILITE CO
12/15/97
12/15/97
$235.58
MUNICILITE CO ACCESSORIES
Strobe
9269
EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES
9388
12/15/97
$35.19
$178.92
MUNICILITE CO Tube
9354
9290
EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES
9312
` *'
$681.43*
MUNICILITE CO Power supply
9418
EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES
EQUIPMENT
9136
OPER ACCESSORIES
9707
184659
12/15/97
12/15/97
$87.95
$59.95
National Fire Protection Elec cost book
National Fire
67359
ST
` *'
$147.90*
Protection Ref material for elec
69008
TRAININGING OR GENERAL SUPPLI
9034
CONF & SCHOOLS
9034
184660
` *'
12/15/97
$66.95
NELSON, CHRISTINE Art work sold
$66.95*
120497
ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER
184661
` *'
12/15/97
$99.27
$99.27*
NELSON, DAVID UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
112497
POLICE DEPT. G UNIF ALLOW
18
12/15/97
$100.00
NISSEN, DICK
*662
$100.00*
Police service
DEC 1997
RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES
184663
` *'
12/15/97
$89.46
NORMAN, POLLY Photography
$89.46*
112897
PARK ADMIN. PROF SERVICES
184664
12/15/97
12/15/97
$11,352.50
NORTH AMERICAN SALT CO. SALT
` *'
$2,657.46
NORTH AMERICAN SALT CO. Salt
10312043
SNOW & ICE REM SALT
$14,009.96*
10316441
SNOW & ICE REM SALT
184665
12/15/97
12/15/97
$37.20
$111.60
NORTH STAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
77634
*'
12/15/97
$102.30
NORTH STAR ICE RANGE BALLS
NORTH STAR ICE
78491
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
VERNON SELLING RANGE
`
$251.10*
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
78722
BALLS
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
184666
12/15/97
$13.42
NORTH STAR INTERNATIONAL Resistor
168616
EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 9380
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
ll -LGC -1997 (11:59)
page 20
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
------------------------------------------=-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
184666
12/15/97
$19.98
NORTH STAR INTERNATIONAL
Pump
171429
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
9778
< *>
$33.40;
184667
12/15/97
$1,406.44
NORTH STAR TURF
Mower
parts
159742
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR
PARTS
9669
12/15/97
$704.60
NORTH STAR TURF
REPAIR
PARTS
156869
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR
PARTS
9669
< *>
$2,111.04*
184668
12/15/97
$158.60
NORTHWEST GRAPHIC
SUPPLY
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
259874
ART SUPPLY GIP
COST OF
GD SOL
9633
12/15/97
$168.74
NORTHWEST GRAPHIC
SUPPLY
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
260135
ART SUPPLY GIF
COST OF
GD SOL
9636
< *>
$327.34*
184669
12/15/97
$892.96
NORTHWESTERN TIRE
CO
Tires
NW42326
EQUIPMENT OPER
TIRES
&
TUBES
9347
12/15/97
$92.66
NORTHWESTERN TIRE
CO
Tires
NW42378
EQUIPMENT OPER
TIRES
&
TUBES
9347
12/15/97
$317.26
NORTHWESTERN TIRE.CO
TIRES
&
TUBES
NW42531
EQUIPMENT OPER
TIRES
TUBES
12/15/97
$96.72
NORTHWESTERN TIRE
CO
TIRES
&
TUBES
NW42565
EQUIPMENT OPER
TIRES
&
TUBES
9347
12/15/97
$33.57
NORTHWESTERN TIRE
CO
TIRES.&
TUBES
NW42623
EQUIPMENT OPER
TIRES
&
TUBES
12/15/97
$155.77
NORTHWESTERN TIRE
CO
TIRES.&
TUBES
NW42665
EQUIPMENT OPER
TIRES
&
TUBES
9347
12/15/97
$114.32
NORTHWESTERN TIRE
CO
TIRES
&
TUBES
NW42632
EQUIPMENT OPER
TIRES
&
TUBES
12/15/97
$280.44
NORTHWESTERN TIRE
CO
TIRES
&
TUBES
NW42666
EQUIPMENT OPER
TIRES
&
TUBES
12/15/97
$67.15
NORTHWESTERN TIRE'CO
TIRES.&
TUBES
NW42762_
EQUIPMENT OPER
TIRES
&
TUBES
9347
< *>
-
$2,050.85*
184672
12/15/97
$25.03
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
121597
GENERAL MAINT
LIGHT
&
POWER
12/15/97
$1,697.31
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
121597
ST LIGHTING RE
LIGHT
&
POWER
12/15/97
$110.40
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
121597
ST LIGHTING OR
LIGHT
&
POWER
12/15/97
$9,363.82
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
121597
TRAFFIC SIGNAL
LIGHT
&
POWER
12/15/97
$855.10
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
121597
GENERAL STORM
LIGHT
&
POWER
12/15/97
$392.74
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
121597
PONDS & LAKES
LIGHT
&
POWER
12/15/97
$2,599.74
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
12159,7
PARKING RAMP
LIGHT
&
POWER
12/15/97
$96.61
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
121597
FIRE DEPT. GEN
LIGHT
&
POWER
12/15/97
$8,378.45
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
121597
CIVIL DEFENSE
LIGHT
&
POWER
12/15/97
$9.49
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
121597
CITY HALL GENE
LIGHT
&
POWER
12/15/97
$875.27
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
121597
PW BUILDING
LIGHT
&
POWER
12/15/97
$8.51
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
121597
ART CENTER BLD
LIGHT
&
POWER
12/15/97
$11,279.34
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
121597
BUILDING MAINT
LIGHT
&
POWER
12/15/97
$87.67
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
121597
CLUB HOUSE
LIGHT
&
POWER
12/15/97
$57.83
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
121597
MAINT OF COURS
LIGHT
&
POWER
12/15/97
$181.32
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
121597
POOL OPERATION
LIGHT
&
POWER
12/15/97
$15.48
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
121597
FRED RICHARDS
LIGHT
&
POWER
12/15/97
$4,312.80
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
121597
ARENA BLDG /GRO
LIGHT
&
POWER
12/15/97
$7.74
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
121597
GUN RANGE
LIGHT
&
POWER
12/15/97
$5,840.03
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
121597
PUMP & LIFT ST
LIGHT
&
POWER
12/15/97
$2,405.30
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
121597
DISTRIBUTION
LIGHT
&
POWER
12/15/97
$3.14
NSP
LIG11T
&
POWER
121597
TANKS TOWERS &
LIGHT
&
POWER
12/15/97
$15.47
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
121597
YORK OCCUPANCY
LIGHT
&
POWER
12/15/97
$440.86
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
121597
VERNON OCCUPAN
LIGHT
&
POWER
12/15/97
$7.74
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
121597
ED BUILDING &
LIGHT
&
POWER
12/15/97
$34.92
NSP
LIGHT
&
POWER
121597
ED BUILDING &
LIGHT
&
POWER
< *>
$48,902.11*
184673
12/15/97
$15.92
OHLIN SALES INC
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
51448
POLICE DEPT. G
GENERAL
SUPPLI
9895
< *>
$15.92*
184674
12/15/97
$135.00
OLSEN FIRE PROTECTION IN
Sprinkler inspection
25625
GOLF DOME
CONTR
REPAIRS
9810
< *>
$135.00*
COUNCIL Ch- -�C REGISTER 11- DEC -1997 (11:59) page 21
CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM
------------------ ----------------------------------
-------------------------------------
184675 12 15 97 ----- -- -------------- - - -- -_
/ $1,850.00 Omni Productions Install sound s stem 6995 ICE ARENA PROG CIP 6562
< *> $1,850.00*
184676
< *>
184677
< *>
184678
184679
184680
184681
184682
184683
12/15/97 $13,134.41
$13,134.41*
12/15/97 $281.80
$281.80*
ORVIS, JOAN
OSWALD HOSE & ADAPTERS
Prof sery ]20897 ARENA ADMINIST PRO SVC OTHER
Flooding hoses 20775
12/15/97
$238.80
$238.80*
PACIFIC SOFTWARE INTERNA
Cont Ed Police
112697
12/15/97
$439.69
PAGING NETWORK OF MINNES
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
120197
$439.69*
12/15/97
$31.85
$31.85*
Palmer, Kathleen E.
Art work sold
120497
12/15/97
12/15/97
$64.30
$174.00
PARK NICOLLET MEDICAL CE
Hep B shot
121597
12/15/97
$588.12
PARK NICOLLET MEDICAL CE
PARK NICOLLET MEDICAL CE
Return to work physic
Pre - employment
121597
121597
12/15/97
12/15/97
$101.00
$75.00
PARK NICOLLET MEDICAL CE
physic
return to work physic
121597
$1,002.42*
PARK NICOLLET MEDICAL CE
DOT drug screening
121597
12/15/97
12/15/97
$138:83
$33.29
PELLA PRODUCTS
Vandel repair
4562
$172.12*
PELLA PRODUCTS
Vandel repair
5118
12/15/97
$935.00
PERKINS LANDSCAPE CONTRA
Landscape
111697
$935.00*
184687 12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
]2/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
$1,262.20
$2,463.45
$333.72
$247.50
$48.00
$62.50
$714.65
$1,095.00
$1,905.70
$289.70
$42.20
$1,441.85
$2,639.18
$50.00
$97.00
$150.60
$85.99
$938.72
$3,909.10
$200.00
$3,187.52
$301.56
$1,032.85
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PIIII.LIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 339142
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 339144
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 339891
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 339694
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 339889
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 339890
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 339892
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 339893
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 339894
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 339895
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 339896
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 339897
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 339898
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 340448
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 341262
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 341263
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 341264
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 34]265
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 341266
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 341462
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 341590
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 341730
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 341731
SKATING RINK M GENERAL SUPPLI 9850
POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS
POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP RENTAL
ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER
GENERAL(BILLIN PROF SERVICES
FIRE DEPT. GEN PHYS EXAMS
CENT SVC GENER ADVERT PERSONL
POLICE DEPT. G PHYS EXAMS
CENT SVC GENER ADVERT PERSONL
BUILDING MAINT REPAIR PARTS
BUILDING MAINT REPAIR PARTS
GENERAL STORM CONTR REPAIRS
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU
YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
9078
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER
# 121597
CENT
SVC
11 -VEC -1997
(11:59)
Monthly mailing
112697
CENT
SVC
GENER
page 22
CHECK NO DATE
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------=-------------------------------------------
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT PO NUM.
184687 12/15/97
$2,142.24
PHILLIPS
WINE
& SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
341732
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD
LIQU
12/15/97
$1,846.61
PHILLIPS
WINE
& SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
341733
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WINE
12/15/97
$286.30
PHILLIPS
WINE
& SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
BE
341734
VERNON SELLING
CST.OF
GDS BEE
12/15/97
$597.70
PHILLIPS
WINE
& SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
342955
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WINE
12/15/97
$1.,593.15
PHILLIPS
WINE
& SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
342956
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WINE
12/15/97
$1,011.54
PHILLIPS
WINE
& SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
342957
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WINE
12/15/97
$134.15
PHILLIPS
WINE
& SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
343697
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
LIQU
12/15/97
$732.55
PHILLIPS
WINE
& SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
343698
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WINE
12/15/97
$1,012.20
PHILLIPS
WINE
& SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
343699
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD
LIQU
12/15/97
$1,555.21
PHILLIPS
WINE
& SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
343700
YORK SELLING-
CST
OF
GD
WINE
12/15/97
$50.60
PHILLIPS
WINE
& SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
MI
343701
.YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GDS MIX
12/15/97
$62.35
PHILLIPS
WINE
& SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
343702
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD
LIQU
12/15/97
$947.44
PHILLIPS
WINE
& SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
343703
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WINE
12/15/97
$145.00
PHILLIPS
WINE
& SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
MI
343704
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GDS MIX
< *>
$34,616.03*
184688 12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
184689 12/15/97
12/15/97
184690 12/15/97
184691 12/15/97
184692 12/15/97
184693 12/15/97
184694 12/15/97
184695 12/15/97
184696 12/15/97
184700 12/15/97
12/15/97
$880.70.,
$331.20
$478.40
$220.80
$441.60
$119.95
$96.60
$604.70
$249.75
$300.60
$3,724.30*
PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING
PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING
PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING
PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING
PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING
PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING
PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING
PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING
PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING
PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING
$110.68 Pirtek Plymouth
$107.62 Pirtek Plymouth
$218.30*
$35.36 PLUNKETTS
.$35.36*
$85.00 POSTMASTER
$85.00*
$300.00. POSTMASTER
$300.00*
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 968514
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 968531
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 968543
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 968610
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 968615
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 968656
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 968657
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 968691
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 968740
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 968769
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
0499
0622
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX
VERNON-SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
50TH -ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
VERNON SELLING CST-OF GDS MIX
ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPLI 9752
ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPLI 9752
670798 ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPLI
Bulk mailing permit
# 121597
CENT
SVC
GENER
POSTAGE
Monthly mailing
112697
CENT
SVC
GENER
POSTAGE
$3',.631.45 POSTMASTER Activity calendar
$3,631.45*
$85'.20 POWER INVESTIGATIONS INC Background check
$85.20*
$617.81 PREMIER FLEET SERVICES
$617.81*
$67.2.33 PRINT SHOP, THE
$672.33*
$238.20 PRIOR WINE COMPANY
$307.85 PRIOR WINE COMPANY
Repair work
Monthly printing
120297 CENT SVC GENER POSTAGE
007031
12509
4278
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 34202
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 37132
LIQUOR 50TH ST PROF SERVICES
EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS
SENIOR CITIZEN GENERAL SUPPLI
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE.
COUNCIL
CH REGISTER
11 .7 -1997 (11:59)
CHECK NO
--------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
page 23
PROGRAM
OBJECT PO NUM
184700
12/15/97
12/15/97
$625.95
$259.93
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
PRIOR WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
-------------------------------------
37134
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
12/15/97
$327.35
COMPANY
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
COST OF GOODS
37135
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX
12/15/97
$1,146.75
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
SOLD MI
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
37142
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
12/15/97
$764.50
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
38281
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
12/15/97
$688.05
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
38283
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
12/15/97
- $11.90
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
38285
75781
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
12/15/97
12/15/97
$45.43
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
39239
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN
12/15/97
$45.43
$136.29
PRIOR WINS COMPANY
PRIOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
39240
CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
12/15/97
$136.29
WINE COMPANY
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
COST
39243
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
12/15/97
$227.15
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
OF GOODS SOLD WI
COST OF
39244
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
12/15/97
$227.15
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
GOODS SOLD WI
COST OF GOODS SOLD
39245
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
12/15/97
12/15/97
$26.14
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
WI
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
39246
39247
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
YORK
12/15/97
$472.45
$502.14
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
PRIOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
39813
SELLING CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF
12/15/97
$51.20
WINE COMPANY
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
39815
GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
12/15/97
$484.15
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
COST OF
39816
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX
12/15/97
$1,017.54
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
GOODS SOLD WI
COST OF GOODS
39818
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
12/15/97
12/15/97
$34.70
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
SOLD WI
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
39821.
39822
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
YORK
12/15/97
$660.65
$1,441.52
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
PRIOR WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
41057
SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
12/15/97
$25.74
COMPANY
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
COST OF
41058
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
12/15/97
$102.40
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
GOODS SOLD WI
COST OF GOODS SOLD
41060
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
12/15/97
12/15/97
$102.96
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
MI
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
41061
41066
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
YORK
12/15/97
- $28.34
$214.25
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
PRIOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
76105
SELLING CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF
12/15/97
$542.74
WINE COMPANY
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
44127.
GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
12/15/97
$68.45
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
COST OF GOODS
44129
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
12/15/97
$499.05
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
SOLD MI
COST OF GOODS SOLD
44130
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX
12/15/97
12/15/97
$205.90
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
WI
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
44134
44137
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
VERNON
12/15/97
$503.28
$277.25
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
PRIOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
44139
SELLING CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING
12/15/97
$160.80
WINE COMPANY
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
44142
CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
12/15/97
$1,486.26
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 44147
COST OF GOODS
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
12/15/97
12/15/97
$346.13
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
SOLD WI 44148
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 44149
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
YORK
12/15/97
$831.75
$143.04
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 44154
SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
YORK SELLING
12/15/97
$556.50
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 46420
CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
12/15/97
$171.00
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 46421
COST OF GOODS
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
*'
12/15/97
$25.94
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
SOLD WI 46422
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
<
$16,090.01*
46422
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
L84701
12/15/97
$198.00
PRYOR RESOURCES
Cont ed
<*'
$198.00*
120297
FINANCE MEETING EXPENS
L84702
` *'
12/15/97
$48.36
$48.36*
Ptashlne, Mildred
Overpayment ambulance 120197
GENERAL FD PRO AMBULANCE
FEES
L84703
< *'
12/15/97
$316.60
$316.60*
QUALITY STAINLESS INC
rail for warming hous 38278
BUILDING MAINT REPAIR
PARTS 9315
L84704
12/15/97
$110.00
RAM
< *'
$110.00*
RAM membership 121597
RECYCLING . CONF & SCHOOLS
COUNCIL
CHE%-d REGISTER
11 -JEC -1997 (11:59)
page 24
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
184705
12/15/97
$37.21
RASMUSSEN, JANAAN SKIBBE
Art work sold
120497
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
< *>
$37.21*
184706
12/15/97
$52.99
RDO EQUIPMENT CO
Part
82798
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
9542
< *>
$52.99*
184707
12/15/97
$560.80
RED WING SHOES
Shoes
891
GENERAL MAINT
SAFETY EQUIPME
< *>
$560.80*
184708
12/15/97
$56.00
Rehnberg, Marcia
Skating class refund
120897
ARENA BLDG /GRO
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$56.00*
184709
12/15/97
$108.62
Rental Center & Power To
Hardware
85513
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
9040
< *>
$108.62*
184710
12/15/97
$39.00
RESOURCE RECYCLING
Subscription
121597
RECYCLING
DUES & SUBSCRI
< *>
$39.00*
184711
12/15/97
$283.17
Rhomar Industries Inc
Material
27114
STREET RENOVAT
GENERAL SUPPLI
9539
< *>
$283.17*
184712
12/15/97
$44.85
RICHARDS, SUSAN
Art work sold
120497
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
< *>
$44.85*
184713
12/15/97
$17.70
RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED
Pin /chain
187896
GENERAL MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
9324
< *>
$17.70*
184714
12/15/97
$166.14
ROBERT B. HILL
Softner salt
037998
MAINT OF COURS
CHEMICALS
9620
< *>
$166.14*
184715
12/15/97
$19.13
ROSLAND, KENNETH
MEETING EXPENSE
120897
CITY COUNCIL
MEETING EXPENS
12/15/97
$20.12
ROSLAND, KENNETH
MEETING EXPENSE
120897
CITY COUNCIL .
MEETING EXPENS
< *>
$39.25*
184716
12/15/97
$37.70
RUSKIN, PHIL
Art work sold
120497
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
< *>
$37.70*
184717
12/15/97
$97.45
SAFETY KLEEN
Haz waste
240085
SUPERV. & OVRH
HAZ. WASTE DIS
< *>
$97.45*
184718
12/15/97
$630.00
Scan -Mark Inc
Bandy balls
971201
EDINA ATHLETIC
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$630.00*
184719
12/15/97
$35.83
SCHARBER & SONS
Tractor parts
174341
ED BUILDING &
REPAIR PARTS
9661
< *>
$35.83*
184720
12/15/97
$503.73
SEARS
Tools /50th & France
ID626514
STREET REVOLVI
GENERAL SUPPLI
9309
12/15/97
$48.33
SEARS
Tools 50th & France
ID626514
STREET REVOLVI
GENERAL SUPPLI
9309
12/15/97
$52.17
SEARS
Tools
SR755412
GENERAL MAINT
TOOLS
9310
< *>
$604.23*
184721
12/15/97
$350.32
Seton Name Plate Company
Signs
B9148580
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
9301
< *>
$350.32*
184722
12/15/97
$27.30
SHELP, NANCY
Art work sold
120497
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
COUNCIL
CH, REGISTER
11 _,:-1997
(11:59)
page 25
CHECK NO DATE
-- -------
CHECK AMOUNT------
- - -- -- - - --
- - - - -- VENDOR---------
- - - - -- DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
<*>
$27.30*
-------------------------
- - - - --
------------------
- - - - --
184723
< *>
12/15/97
$100.00
$100.00*
SHEPARD, JOHN
Police service
DEC 1997 RESERVE PROGRA PERS SERVICES
184724
< *>
12/15/97
$100.00
$100.00*
SHIRLEY, TOM
Reimburement
112697
ED ADMINISTRAT CONTR REPAIRS
184725
< *>
12/15/97
$159.75
$159.75*
Signal Finance
Water
5525
CONTINGENCIES
GENERAL SUPPLI
184726
12/15/97
12/15/97
$151.87
$178.45
SIMS SECURITY
SIMS SECURITY
Guard
8287651
ED BUILDING &
PROF SERVICES
*
<>
$330.32*
Guard
8301548
ED BUILDING &
PROF SERVICES
184727
12/15/97
12/15/97
$1,244.95
$11.75
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS
I COST OF GOODS
SOLD
BE 78353
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE
12/15/97
$2,204.10
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS
I COST OF GOODS
I COST OF GOODS
SOLD
SOLD
MI 78354
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX
12/15/97
12/15/97
$606.20
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS
I COST OF GOODS
SOLD
BE 78569
BE 78603
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
50TH ST SELLIN CST
12/15/97
$23.50
$1,801.70
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS
I COST OF GOODS
SOLD
MI 78604
OF GDS BEE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX
12/15/97
$35.25
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS
I COST OF GOODS
I COST OF GOODS
SOLD
SOLD
BE 78759
MI
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
< >
$5,927.45*
78760
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
184728
12/15/97
12/15/97
$79.34
$79.33
SOUTHWEST JOURNAL
SOUTHWEST JOURNAL
Liq ad
Liq
20538
LIQUOR 50TH ST ADVERT OTHER
12/15/97
$79.33
SOUTHWEST JOURNAL
ad
Liq ad
20538
LIQUOR YORK GE
ADVERT OTHER
< *>
$238.00*
20538
VERNON LIQUOR
ADVERT OTHER
184729
< *>
12/15/97
$497.00
$497.00*
SPALDING
COST OF GOODS
- PRO
S 50373280
PRO SHOP
COST OF GDS -PR
1162
184730
< *>
12/15/97
$196.00
$196.00*
Spooner, Anne
Prf sery AC
120897
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
184731
12/15/97
12/15/97
$277.56
$227.67
SPS
SPS
Pipe for warming hour 2819609
BUILDING MAINT
REPAIR PARTS
9316
< *>
$505.23*
AC Heater
2819610
ART CENTER BLD
GENERAL SUPPLI
9583
184732
< *>
12/15/97
$279.67
$279.67*
ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO
Switch /lamp
SI60604
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
5131
184733
< *>
12/15/97
$731.50
$731.50*
STAN MORGAN & ASSOCIATES
Shelving
46559
YORK SELLING
GENERAL SUPPLI
9268
184734
< *>
12/15/97
$2,203.15
$2,203.15*
STAR TRIBUNE
Help wanted
113097
CENT SVC GENER
ADVERT PERSONL
184735
< *>
12/15/97
$225.00
$225.00*
STATE BOARD OF ELECTRICI
REPAIR PARTS
120297
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
184736
< *>
12/15/97
$30.00
$30.00*
STATE BOARD OF ELECTRICI
Insepction
120397
CITY HALL GENE
GENERAL SUPPLI
184737
12/15/97
$18.16
STORAGE EQUIPMENT INC
Hook
64459
PW BUILDING
GENERAL SUPPLI
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
11- DEC -1997 (11:59)
page 26
CHECK NO
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
,, OBJECT
PO NUM
<*>
$18.16*
184738
12/15/97
$79.28
STREICHERS
Repair squads
645111
EQUIPMENT OPER
CONTR REPAIRS
9858
12/15/97
$132.42
STREICHERS
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
694141
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP MAINT
9652
12/15/97
$364.08
STREICHERS
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
665601
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP MAINT
9521
12/15/97
$126.00
STREICHERS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
719101
RESERVE PROGRA
GENERAL SUPPLI
9469
12/15/97
$18.97
STREICHERS
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
719111
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP MAINT
< *>
$720.75*
184739
12/15/97
$716.24
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
Parts
CVCB3114
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
9522
12/15/97
$78.66
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
Repair parts
96618
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS
9600
12/15/97
$18.34
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
Repair parts
96626
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS
9600
12/15/97
$42.83
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
Hose asm
96629
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
9529
12/15/97
$85.67
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
Hose
966301
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
9529
12/15/97
$42.83
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
hose asm
970731
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
9540
12/15/97
$55.27
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
Hose asm
97244
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
9543
12/15/97
$35.44
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
Connector
97460
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
9547
12/15/97
$15.14
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
Resistor
97819
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
9771
< *>
$1,090.42*
184740
12/15/97
$238.82
SUBURBAN PROPANE
LP Fuel
111797
AgENA-ICE MAIN
OFFICE SUPPLIE
< *>
$238.82*
184741
12/15/97
$45.74
SUPERAMERICA
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
0184708
POLICE DEPT. G
MILEAGE
12/15/97
$51.56
SUPERAMERICA
Gas & Propane
111297
EQUIPMENT OPER
GASOLINE
< *>
$97.30*
184742
12/15/97
$3,324.60
Superior Special Service
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
97 -4FNLP
PKBOND CIP
EQUIP REPLACEM
< *>
$3,324.60*
184743
12/15/97
$355.82
Susan Frame Design
COST OF GOODS SOLD
3303
ART SUPPLY GIP
COST OF GD SOL
9631
< *>
$355.82*
184744
12/15/97
$100.00
SWANSON, HAROLD
Police service
DEC 1997
RESERVE PROGRA
PERS SERVICES
< *>
$100.00*
184745
12/15/97
$59.15
Tapper, Elizabeth N.
Art work sold
120497
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
< *>
$59.15*
184746
12/15/97
$4.65
TELEPHONE ANSWERING CENT
Answering service
111797
GENERAL MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$4.65*
184747
12/15/97
$236.68
TERMINAL SUPPLY CO
Amber lite
2395600
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
9173
12/15/97
$259.82
TERMINAL SUPPLY CO
Strobe CL
2575800
ED BUILDING &
GENERAL SUPPLI
9175
12/15/97
$133.05
TERMINAL SUPPLY CO
Tape
2736000
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
9354
< *>
$629.55*
184748
12/15/97
$950.00
TerraDek Lighting Inc
Cont repairs
2100378
ST LIGHTING RE
CONTR REPAIRS
9900
< *>
$950.00*
184749
12/15/97
$185.00
THERAPISTS OFFICE SOLUTI
GENERAL SUPPLIES
025347
POLICE DEPT. G
GENERAL SUPPLI
9455
< *>
$185.00*
184750
12/15/97
$21,662.38
THOMAS & SONS CONSTRUCTI
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
97 -6 #1
SIDEWALK DEWEY
CIP
< *>
$21,662.38*
COUNCIL
CHE tEGISTER
11- -1997 (11:59)
CHECK NO
- ------
DATE
---------- ---------------
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR DESCRIPTION
INVOICE PROGRAM
page 27
184751
*>
12/15/97
--------
$19,508.25
- - -- ------------ -------------- - - - - -- 9999 -- 97-3-4-
THOMAS & SONS CONSTRUCTI EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 97 -3 #4
- ---BOND- -- ----
PKBOND
OBJECT
- - - --- _
PO NUM
____________
�
$19,508.25*
CIP
EQUIP REPLACEM
184752
12/15/97
12/15/97
- $104.55
$83.40
THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP COST OF GOODS SOLD
THORPE DISTRIBUTING
BE 86229
GRILL
CST OF GDS BEE
3968
12/15/97
$368.00
COMP COST OF GOODS SOLD
THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP COST OF GOODS SOLD
BE 120322
BE
GRILL
CST OF GDS BEE
3968
12/15/97
12/15/97
$2,709.90
$3,116.80
THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP COST OF GOODS SOLD
90607
BE 120890
GRILL CST OF GDS BEE
VERNON SELLING CST
3968
` >
$6,173.55*
THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP COST OF GOODS SOLD
BE 121370
OF GDS BEE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
184753
12/15/97
12/15/97
$36.32
$247.90
TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPL Welding supplies
TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPL
139947
STREET NAME SI
GENERAL SUPPLI
9199
` *>
12/15/97
$133.92
WELDING SUPPLIES
TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPL Cylinder rental
140372
EQUIPMENT OPER WELDING SUPPLI
9373
$418.14*
.565836
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPLI
184754
` *'
12/15/97
$800.00
$800.00*
TOWN & COUNTRY FENCE Garden park softball
2461
PKBOND CIP
EQUIP REPLACEM
9848
184755
` *'
12/15/97
$79.61
TRANSPORT TRUCK CENTER Parts
E7323041
$79.61*
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
9545
184756
` *>
12/15/97
$425.00
$425.00*
TUFFCOAT URETHANE FLOOR Resurface locker room 1184
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
9682
184757
` *>
12/15/97
$2,081.00
$2,081.00*
TWIN CITIES MUSICIAN UNI PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 112497
ED ADMINISTRAT
PROF SERVICES
184758
12/15/97
12/15/97
$2,244.88
$158.75
Twin Cities Service Cent EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE I13101
Twin Cities
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP MAINT
` *'
$2,403.63*
Service Cent Mobile service
I14131
EQUIPMENT OPER
RADIO SERVICE
184759
*'
12/15/97
$17.96
TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO Oxygen
`
$17.96*
395052
FIRE DEPT. GEN
FIRST AID SUPP
184760
*'
12/15/97
$188.00
UHL CO Calibrate
`
$188.00*
78962
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
184761
12/15/97
$6,826.05
UNISOURCE Paper
` '
$6,826.05*
48508
COMMUNICATIONS
MAG /NEWSLET EX 9974
184762
*'
12/15/97
$575.27
UNITED AGRI PRODUCTS Maxi melt
`
$575.27*
20734
STREET REVOLVI
GENERAL SUPPLI 9562
184763
` *'
12/15/97
$7,418.95
$7,418.95*
UNITED PROPERTIES 3400 W 66th street
120597
UTILITY PROG
ACCOUNTS REC.
184764
` *'
12/15/97
$883.13
$883.13*
United States Mechanical Strainer baskets
478301
POOL OPERATION
GENERAL
SUPPLI
184765
` *'
12/15/97
$340.00
$340.00*
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA MEETING EXPENSE
120497
ENGINEERING
GE
MEETING EXPENS
184767
12/15/97
12/15/97
$55.60
$324.00
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE
121597
DARE
12/15/97
$243.23
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE
121597
CENT SVC GENER
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE
121597
ART CENTER BLD
TELEPHONE
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
118203
SEWER TREATMEN
CONTR REPAIRS
11- DEC -1997 (11:59)
Vinifera
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
365
page 28
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
2066
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
184767
12/15/97
$206.92
US
WEST
COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
121597
SKATING & HOCK
TELEPHONE
Lites for traffic sig
20004460
12/15/97
$179.57
US
WEST
COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
121597
SENIOR CITIZEN
TELEPHONE
Voss Lighting
Lamps
12/15/97
$114.38
US
WEST
COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
121597
BUILDING MAINT
TELEPHONE
9581
WALSER FORD
12/15/97
$811.16
US
WEST
COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
121597
CLUB HOUSE
TELEPHONE
ACCESSORIES
9385
12/15/97
$57.68
US
WEST
COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
121597
MAINT OF COURS
TELEPHONE
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
12/15/97
$76.92
US
WEST
COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
121597
POOL OPERATION
TELEPHONE
12/15/97
$326.57
US
WEST
COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
121597
ARENA BLDG /GRO
TELEPHONE
12/15/97
$383.55
US
WEST
COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
121597
ED BUILDING &
TELEPHONE
12/15/97
$55.60
US
WEST
COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
121597
PUMP & LIFT ST
TELEPHONE
12/15/97
$232.95
US
WEST
COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
121597
50TH ST OCCUPA
TELEPHONE
12/15/97
$229.88
US
WEST
COMMUNICATIONS
- TELEPHONE
121597
YORK OCCUPANCY
TELEPHONE
12/15/97
$191.12
US
WEST
COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
121597
VERNON OCCUPAN
TELEPHONE
< *>
$3,489.13*
184768
12/15/97
$260.10
US
WEST
COMMUNICATIONS
T1 -Logis
D0869309
CENT SVC GENER
TELEPHONE
< *>
$260.10*
184769
12/15/97
$485.16
VAN PAPER CO.
PAPER SUPPLIES
191940
CITY HALL GENE
PAPER SUPPLIES
9768
12/15/97
$69.23
VAN PAPER CO.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
191943
ED BUILDING &
GENERAL SUPPLI
9797
< *>
$554.39*
184770
12/15/97
$242.25
VANTAGE
ELECTRIC
Light & fan repairs
14747
ED BUILDING &
CONTR REPAIRS
9944
< *>
$242.25*
184771
12/15/97
$250.00
Varnum,
Riddering, Schmi
FCC Comments
471896
CONTINGENCIES
PRO SVC - LEGA
< *>
$250.00*
184772 12/15/97
184773 12/15/97
184774 12/15/97
184775 12/15/97
184776 12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
184777 12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
184778 12/15/97
$152.08
$152.08*
$522.00
$522.00*
$524.00
$524.00*
$510.10
$510.10*
$45.37
$156.92
$110.21
$26.63
$146.44
$485.57*
$16.69
$213.30
$5.64
$12.15
$247.78*
$100.00
$100.00*
VIDEO DUPLICATION INC
Video duplication
118203
SEWER TREATMEN
CONTR REPAIRS
9358
Vinifera
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
365
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
VINTAGE ONE WINES
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
2066
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
Vogel Paint & Wax
Marking paint
292571
PAVEMENT MARKI
PAINT
9193
Voss Lighting
Golf course
20052760
FRED RICHARDS
REPAIR PARTS
9156
Voss Lighting
Lites for traffic sig
20004460
TRAFFIC SIGNAL
GENERAL SUPPLI
8167
Voss Lighting
Lamp
20067150
CITY HALL GENE
GENERAL SUPPLI
9568
Voss Lighting
Lamps
20067150
PUMP & LIFT ST
GENERAL SUPPLI
9568
Voss Lighting
Lamps
20069210
BUILDING MAINT
REPAIR PARTS
9581
WALSER FORD
Cover
57253
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
8557
WALSER FORD
Parts
59443
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
9385
WALSER FORD
Plate
59747
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
9587
WALSER FORD
O Rings
59917
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
9772
WALSH, WILLIAM
Police sery
DEC 1997
RESERVE PROGRA
PERS SERVICES
COUNCIL CHi REGISTER
11---,:-1997 (11:59)
page 29
CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM
- -- --- -----
--- - - - - -- -- - - -- OBJECT PO NUM
--------------------------
184779 12/15/97 " """------- --------- - - - - --
$283.50 WEIGLE, SUE --- --- - -- --ILEA--------- - --- --
< *> $283.50* MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 112697 PARK ADMIN. MILEAGE
184780 12/15/97
184781 12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
184782
< *>
184783
184784
184785
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
$178.75 Welsh, Liz
$178.75*
$399.03
$287.44
$32.03
$441.76
$1,160.26*
$78.09
$73.76
$33.99
- $78.09
$107.75*
$360.00
$360.00*
$159.49
$218.27
$377.76*
Art work sold 120497 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER
WEST WELD
WEST WELD
SUPPLY
SUPPLY
CO.
CO.
Bits
Drill bits
10342
EQUIPMENT OPER
WELDING SUPPLI
9338
WEST WELD
SUPPLY
CO.
Eyeshields
10480
10639
PUMP & LIFT ST
REPAIR PARTS
9564
WEST WELD
SUPPLY
CO.
Misc hardware
10693
EQUIPMENT OPER
SAFETY EQUIPME
9535
COMPANY, THE
12/15/97
$823.34
WINE
WINE
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
9695
WESTBURNE
WESTBURNE
SUPPLY
SUPPLY
INC
INC
Circuit board AC
AC heating
3815921
ART CENTER BLD
GENERAL SUPPLI
9676
WESTBURNE
SUPPLY
INC
AC heater
2650640
ART CENTER BLD
GENERAL SUPPLI
9697
WESTBURNE
SUPPLY
INC
Credit
3825803
ART CENTER BLD
GENERAL SUPPLI
9711
$489.00*
3828072
ART CENTER BLD
GENERAL SUPPLI
9676
WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT
Oil receiver
59853
EQUIPMENT OPER
SAFETY EQUIPME
9404
WILLIAMS STEEL
WILLIAMS STEEL
$308.00
Golf dome
Spray paint
76405301
CLU HOUSE
REPAIR PARTS
9311
WORLD
WORLD
CLASS WINES INC
CLASS WINES INC
12/15/97
12/15/97
76595701
PUM & LIFT ST
GENERAL SUPPLI
9566
$641.30 WILSON SPORTING GOODS CO COST OF GOODS - PRO S 1650648 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 1161
$641.30*
184787
12/15/97
12/15/97
$1,241.65
WINE
COMPANY, THE
12/15/97
$324.75
$1,006.21
WINE
WINE
COMPANY, THE
COMPANY, THE
12/15/97
12/15/97
$514.30
$729.50
WINE
COMPANY, THE
12/15/97
$729.50
WINE
WINE
COMPANY, THE
COMPANY, THE
12/15/97
12/15/97
$990.61
$1,707.56
WINE
COMPANY, THE
12/15/97
$823.34
WINE
WINE
COMPANY, THE
COMPANY, THE
12/15/97
12/15/97
- $12.67
- $519.60
WINE
COMPANY, THE
12/15/97
$987.92
WINE
WINE
COMPANY, THE
COMPANY, THE
12/15/97
12/15/97
$452.77
WINE
COMPANY, THE
` *>
$1,129.83
$10,105.67*
WINE
COMPANY, THE
184788
12/15/97
$489.00
WINE
MERCHANTS
` *>
$489.00*
184789
< *>
12/15/97
$173.74
WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY
$173.74*
184790
12/15/97
12/15/97
$308.00
WORLD
CLASS WINES INC
12/15/97
$385.00
$449.63
WORLD
WORLD
CLASS WINES INC
CLASS WINES INC
12/15/97
12/15/97
$428.00
WORLD
CLASS WINES INC
$527.13
WORLD
CLASS WINES INC
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 13230
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 13231
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 13237
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 13260
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 13312
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 13313
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 13563
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 13564
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 13565
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 13789
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 13834
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 13979
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 13980
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 13981
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 21430
COST OF GOODS - PRO S DE1996
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 66508
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 66509
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 66537
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 66541
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 66701
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELL.IN CST OF GD WINE
PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 9246
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
11 -UGC -1997
(11:59)
page 30
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT PO NUM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
184790
12/15/97
$781.58
WORLD
CLASS
WINES
INC
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
66702
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WINE .
12/15/97
$454.63
WORLD
CLASS
WINES
INC
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
66713
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WINE
12/15/97
$49.00
WORLD
CLASS
WINES
INC
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
66714
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WINE
12/15/97
$115.00
WORLD
CLASS
WINES
INC
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
66716
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WINE
12/15/97
$45.00
WORLD
CLASS
WINES
INC
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
66717
50TH ST SELLIN
CS1
OF
GD
WINE
12/15/97
$899.21
WORLD
CLASS
WINES
INC
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
66932
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WINE
12/15/97
$662.10
WORLD
CLASS
WINES
INC
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
66934
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WINE
< *>
$5,104.28*
184791
12/15/97
$175.00
WORLD
WATERPARK
ASSOCIAT
Membership
fees
112497
POOL ADMIN
CONF &
SCHOOLS
< *>
$175.00*
184792
12/15/97
$100.00
WROBLESKI,
HENRY
Police
sery
DEC 1997
RESERVE PROGRA
PERS SERVICES
< *>
$100.00*
184793 12/15/97
184794 12/15/97
184795 12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
184796 12/15/97
12/15/97
12/15/97
$875.25 XEROX CORPORATION EQUIPMENT RENTAL
$875.25*
$220.46 ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS INC Brush
$220.46*
$52.48
$58.26
$46.42
$157.16*
$69.81
$25.64
$35.46
$130.91*
$763,748.79*
ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE
ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE
ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE
ZIEGLER INC
ZIEGLER INC
ZIEGLER INC
Drugs
First aid supplies
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
Parts
Sensor
Part
59729248 CENT SVC GENER EQUIP RENTAL
62309 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 1090
54096743 CjZY HALL GENE GENERAL SUPPLI 9893
54096744 ED ADMINISTRAT SAFETY EQUIPME
54023788 ED ADMINISTRAT SAFETY EQUIPME
PC000082 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 9537
PC000824 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 9533
PC000082 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 9541
COUNCIL•CHl SUMMARY 11 -1997 (12:02)
page 1
-
------------------ ----- ------=-------------- - - - - -- - --
- ---------------------------------------------
FUND # 10 GENERAL FUND ----- -------------- ------------
FUND # 11 COMMUNITY DEVELP. BLOCK GR $2$9,575.13
FUND # 12 COMMUNICATIONS $6,936.51
FUND # 15 WORKING CAPITAL $6,936.05
FUND # 23 ART CENTER $17,574.11
FUND # 25 GOLF DOME FUND $6,538.02
FUND # 26 SWIMMING POOL FUND $$,900.67
1
FUND # 27 GOLF COURSE FUND $1,316.37
FUND # 28 ICE ARENA FUND $14,965.29
$51,900.65
FUND # 29 GUN RANGE FUND
$774
FUND # 30 EDINBOROUGH /CENTENNIAL LAK $7
FUND # 40 UTILITY FUND $19,645.83
$
FUND # 41 STORM SEWER UTILITY FUND ,862.58
$6
FUND # 42 RECYCLING PROGRAM $6,282.84
FUND # 50 LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND $149.00
I ?UND # 60 CONSTRUCTION FUND $$21,092.25
FUND # 61 PARK BOND FUND $21,662.38
$76,872.37
$763,748.79*
TO:
FROM:
VIA:
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
Mayor & City Council
Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works
Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15.000
DATE: 15 December, 1997
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Tandem Asphalt Roller
Company
1. Rufferidge Johnson
2. Aspen Equipment
3.
4.
5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Rufferidge Johnson
GENERAL INFORMATION:
AGENDA ITEM V.A.
Amount of Quote or Bid
1. $ 29,031.90
2. $ 28,909.43
3.
4.
5.
$ 29,301.90
This purchase is for the replacement of an existing patch roller, Unit #25.111. The recommended bid is
from Rufferidge Johnson because low bid did not meet specifications (see memo on reverse side).
This purchase will be funded from the equipment replacement fund.
Public Works - Streets
Signatdre Departmen
The Recommended Bid is
within budget not within budget d6hn Wallin, F pence Director -
Kenneth Ro land, City Manager
CITY OF EDINA
PUBLIC WORKS DEPART14ENT
DATE: December 8, 1997
TO: Fran Hoffman, City Engineer /Director of Public Works
FROM: Steve Johnson, Public Works Coordinator
SUBJECT: ASPHALT ROLLER BIDS
Two bids were received on the asphalt roller:
Rufferidge Johnson, $27,260
Aspen Equipment $27,145
I recommend the bid be awarded to Rufferidge Johnson (high
bidder). Aspen Equipment does.not meet specifications in 2
areas:
#1.) Center joint oscillation 15 degrees vs 10 degrees. The
15 degree would give us much better turning radius.
#2.) Drum roller vibration - specs call for front, rear, or
both. Aspen Equipment roller will do rear drum or both
only. This could be critical for patch work.
There are also some other features we like about the Rufferidge
Johnson machine:
#1.) Bypass tow valve - should we ever have to tow or pull
the machine, it is equipped with a valve to release the
hydraulics, making it towable.
#2.) Vibratory hits 8100 LBF vs 7000 LBF.
This is a replacement for patch roller 25.511 Rosco - Roll Pak 3,
1988.
SJ /dj
c�
ay REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
lees
TO:
FROM:
VIA:
SUBJECT
DATE:
Mayor Smith and Members of the City Council
John Keprios, Director of Parks and Recreation
Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000
December 12, 1997
AGENDA ITEM V. B.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Section #1 Tree Trimming Project - #TT -98.
Company Amount of Ouote or Bid
1. Precision Landscape & Tree, Inc. 12" & under DBH Over 12" DBH
$2.62 /inch $4.42 /inch
ONLY ONE BID RECEIVED
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Account #: 'Assessment
Precision Landscape & Tree, Inc. $2.62 for trees 12" &
under DBH; $4.42 for trees over 12" DBH
GENERAL INFORMATION:
At the Public Hearing on November 17, 1997, the City Council approved the public improvement
project #TT -98, which is for trimming boulevard trees in the northeast section (Section #1) of
Edina. The northeast section (Section #1) is the area bounded by France Ave. to the east, 54th
Street to the south, Highway 100 to the west and the City limits within those boundaries to the
north.
At the bid opening on December 12, 1997, only one bid was received for this project. Three
vendors picked up specifications, however, only one vendor chose to submit a bid. In addition to
advertising the project in the Construction Bulletin and Sun Newspaper, we made numerous phone
calls to potential vendors to submit competitive quotes. Due to the large amount of contract tree
work in the Twin Cities area, we received only one bid.
The sole bid is higher than expected, however, after discussing the bid with other tree trimming
companies and our City Forester, I am convinced that it is very competitive in today's tree
trimming marketplace. To compare the lone bid to the marketplace, I called two other reputable
tree trimming companies (Rainbow Tree Care Company and Hugo Tree Company) who each
quoted even higher bids over the phone. These companies chose not to bid the project because of
their workload commitments. I asked all three companies if we could expect to see lower bids
0
2
next year if we delayed the project one year. In each case the response was "possibly, but not
likely."
My original cost estimates that were proposed at the public hearing were based on 1996 prices,
however, I am now told that last year's price was unusually low due to supply and demand. I am
confident that the higher than expected bid is as good as the market will bear at this time. In fact,
the contract bid approach provides residents a significant savings compared to each resident
contracting a private tree trimmer_ on their own. A copy of my original estimates vs. actual cost
comparison is included in this report.
If this bid is approved by the Council, the City Forester will work closely with the company and
place accurate tree - trimming cost estimates on each property owner's door two weeks prior to the
scheduled trimming. The resident will still have the opportunity at that time to chose to trim the
tree(s) himself or secure his own contractor. At that time, residents will likely find that securing
their own private contractor will cost between 20 % -60% more than allowing the City to contract
the trimming.
As outlined in the public hearing, there are approximately 1,010 trees in section 91 to be trimmed,
918 of them are on private property within the City's easement and 92 trees are on City owned
property. Trimming will be done to provide clearance over the street to 16 feet in height and a
clearance over the sidewalks of 8 feet in height, remove dead wood and do moderate crown
thinning. The total cost of the project is estimated to be approximately $51,000.
There may be some savings by rejecting the bid and delay the tree trimming project until next year,
however, it is my recommendation that it is in the residents' best interest to go forward with the
project this year and accept the bid. Precision Landscape and Tree Incorporated has been the low
bid tree trimming contractor for the City of Edina's boulevard tree trimming projects for the past
three consecutive years. They have proven to be a very reputable, professional and responsive
company with excellent customer service.
Edina Park and Recreation
John K os, Director Department
This Recommended bid is
within budget not within budget ohn Waft Finance irector
Kenneth Ikosland, City Mi nager
I
{
1997 -98 TREE TRIMMING PROJECT
COST ESTIMATES VS. ACTUAL COST
ORIGINAL
ACTUAL
ESTIMATES
COST
8"
boulevard
tree
$13.17
$20.96
10"
boulevard
tree
$15.65
$26.20
12"
boulevard
tree
$18.13
$31.44
14"
boulevard
tree
$39.93
$61.88
16"
boulevard
tree
$45.17
$70.72
20"
boulevard
tree
$55.65
$88.40
24"
boulevard
tree
$66.13
$106.08
32"
boulevard
tree
$87.09
$141.44
Prices
do not include
sales tax or $3.24 per tree
administrative
fee.
TO:
FROM:
VIA:
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
Mayor & City Council
Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works
Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15.000
DATE: 15 December, 1997
ITEM DESCRIPTION: 4 Wheel Drive Tractor with Attachments
Company
1. Land Care Equipment Co., Inc.
2. Cushman Motor Company, Inc.
3.
4.
5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Land Care Equipment Co., Inc.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
AGENDA ITEM v.c.
Amount of Quote or Bid
1. $ 18,264.75
2. $ 19,164.68
3.
4.
5.
$ 18,264.75
This purchase is for a tractor with attachments including cab, power broom, blade and drop spreader to
be used for maintenance in the 50th & France area. The purchase will be funded from the equipment
replacement fund and assessed to the 50th & France maintenance budget over a two year period.
Signatwfe
The Recommended Bid is
within budget
Public Works - Streets
De artment
not within budget Johli Wallin, Finance Director
Kenneth Rosland, City
7-A
0
\lass
t4
REPO RT /REC-OM MEN DATION
To: MAYOR & COUNCIL
From: VINCE BONGAARTS
TRAFFIC SAFETY COORD.
Date: DECEMBER 15, 1997
� Subject:
TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF
REVIEW - DECEMBER 2, 1997
Recommendation:
Agenda Item #
VI.A.
Consent
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends F�
To HRA
❑
To Council
Action ®
Motion
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
.
Discussion
Approve Traffic Safety Staff Review of December 2, 1997, as presented.
0
�1
TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 2, 1997
The staff review of traffic safety matters occurred on December 2, 1997. Staff present
included the Assistant City Manager, Police Chief, City Engineer, Assistant City
Engineer, the Traffic Safety Coordinator and the Public Works Traffic Control Specialist.
From that review, the below recommendations are provided. On each of the items,
persons involved have been contacted and the staff recommendation has been
discussed with them. They have also been informed that if they disagree with the
recommendation or have additional facts to present, they can be included on the
December 15, 1997, Council Agenda.
SECTION A:
Requests on which the staff recommends approval.
The staff recommends approval of the three new "Stop" signs on Ikola Way at
Braemar Boulevard and also the addition of "No Parking" signs along Ikola Way
to provide for easy access of emergency vehicles to Braemar Arena.
2. Request to do something about a continually blocked intersection during evening
rush hours at Metro Boulevard and Edina Industrial Boulevard. Requesters say
you can't get out of the parking lot at 5125 Edina Industrial Boulevard during the
rush hours. There are "Don't Block Intersection" signs already in place. Problem
seems to occur because of backup from vehicles trying to exit on to Highway
100. This area will be reconstructed in 1998 in order to relieve some of this
pressure.
The staff recommends that for the present time, that the "Don't Block
Intersections" signs be highlighted and enforcement by the Police Department at
the intersection of Metro Boulevard and Edina Industrial Boulevard.
SECTION B:
Requests on which the staff recommends denial of request.
None.
TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW
December 2, 1997
Page 2
SECTION C:
Requests which are deferred to a later date or referred to others.
1. Request for three -way -all -way "Stop" signs at West 68" Street and Cornelia
Drive.
Staff decided to continue this to January, 1998, in order to run some speed
surveys which haven't been done since West 66th Street reopened.
The speed monitor - display trailer has been in this area five times to date and
according to some of the residents, hasn't done much to slow down traffic.
2. Reference the continued discussion regarding some kind of controls or signing to
prevent cut through traffic and speed in the Parkwood Hills area.
A week long traffic count and speed survey was done Wednesday 11/5/97
through Tuesday, 11/11/97 on Dovre Drive east of Lincoln Drive. This survey
showed that in a 24 hour period, 45% of the traffic was coming through in a 4
hour period, 7 -9 AM and 4 -6 PM with 35% between 4 -6 PM.
The speed survey showed an 85 percentile speed of 30 MPH for this period on
Dovre Drive.
The staff was going to consult with Dennis Eyler of Strgrar Roscoe Fausch (SRF)
on 12/2/97, but that had to be postponed until 12/12/97. SRF had done some
previous studies of this area.
Discussion on this issue will be continued to January, 1998.
3. Request for no through truck traffic or truck restrictions on Washington Avenue
between 3`d Street South and Maloney Avenue.
This topic was continued from the November agenda. In discussions with the
City of Hopkins it was learned that the streets on their side of and bordering
Highway 169 are state aid designated streets. However, they don't feel they
have to open them to truck traffic until and at which time they are required to
make major repairs to those streets.
Super Value was contacted regarding their truck traffic. They don't allow any of
their trucks which they have control of to use Washington Avenue south of 3rd
TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW
December 2, 1997
Page 3
Street South. They did say however, there are some vendor type trucks they
have no control over that may use Washington Avenue.
Further contact is to be made with Mn /DOT as to what signing and restrictions
can be utilized on the Edina side of Highway 169 reference Washington Avenue.
4. On 11/17/97 the Edina City Council approved the changing of the one -way on
Edgebrook Place to the opposite direction. The direction of the one -way street
will now be from north to south. They also elected to leave the "Stop" signs for
northbound and southbound Browndale at the north end of Edgebrook Place in
place and add a "Stop" sign for the south end of Edgebrook which exits on to
Browndale.
•a
AGENDA N0. VI.B.
MEMO
TO: Mayor and Council
FROM: Ken Rosland
DATE: December 9, 1997
RE: Police and Fire Training Academy
I want to quickly take time to inform you of the progress being made with the South Metro Training
Academy and ask you to adopt the special legislation pertaining to the academy.
Construction is anticipated to occur in summer of 1998. The size and design of the academy is pending
funding through the 1998 Governor's Bonding Bill. The Governor will be presenting his
recommendations in February at which point the legislature may make revisions to the bonding bill prior
to approval. In this proposal, Bloomington, Eden Prairie, Edina, Metropolitan Airports Commission and
Richfield are seeking 2.5 million to be used in conjunction with other funds provided by the communities
to construct the proposed police and fire training facility. Meanwhile, completion of the South Metro
Training Academy business plan is expected to be the first part of January.
The four communities participating in this venture introduced a bill in the 1997 legislative session
seeking authority for each community to bond up to a million dollars in general obligations bonds,
without conducting a referendum, for construction of a public safety training facility. This was done so
that communities would have an option for bringing money to the table. This special legislation was
approved by the legislature and, in order for it to be effective, has to be approved by the governing
bodies prior to the upcoming legislative session. The City of Edina has no intentions of bonding for
money to pay for this training academy, but has recommended to the other communities that regardless
of whether or not bonding will be the method of payment, adoption of this legislation should occur.
Consequently, I would ask that the Council approve this legislation realizing that approval of this
legislation in no way commits the City of Edina.
The following Certificate of Approval requires that the Edina City Council approve this legislation and
that it be filed with the Secretary of State prior to the next legislative session. I have also included a
copy of the enabling legislation and statute 645.021 which requires this legislation be approved by the
governing bodies.
Sec. of State Elect. Fax:612- 296 -9073 Dec 2 '97 13:13
CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL OF SPECIAL LAW
BY GOVERNING BODY
(Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, 645.02 and 645.021)
STATE OF MINNESOTA
County of Hennepin
TO THE SECRETARY OF STATE OF MINNESOTA:
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, That the undersigned chief clerical officer of the
City of Edina
P. 0203
DOES HEREBY CERTIFY, that in compliance with the provisions of Laws, 19 97.-, Chapter 645
requiring approval by a majority vote of the governing body of said local governmental unit before it
becomes effective, the Edina City Council
(designate governing body)
at a meeting duly held on the 15 day ofDecember 199 . by resolution
did approve said Laws, 19 97 -,Chapter 645
(if other than resolution, specify)
by a majority vote* of all of the members thereof (Ayes ; Noes
Absent or not voting _� and the following additional steps, if any, required by statute or charter were
taken:
A copy of the resolution is hereto annexed and made a part of this certificate by reference.
Signed:
SEAL
(Official designation of officer)
(This form prescribed by the Attorney General and furnished by the Secretary of State as
required in Minnesota Statutes 645.021)
'If extraordinary majority is required by the special law, insert fraction or percentage here.
Please see teverside side for instructions for completing this form.
certauth.law Rev. 6193
1 A bill for an act
2 relating to local government; permitting the cities of
3 Bloomington, Chanhassen, Eden Prairie, Edina, and
4 Richfield to issue general obligation bonds for a
5 joint training facility.
6 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA:
7 Section 1. (PUBLIC SAFETY TRAINING FACILITY.]
8 Each of the cities of Bloomington, Chanhassen, Eden
9 Prairie, Edina, and Richfield may issue general obligation bonds
10 of the city in an amount not. to exceed $1,000,000 for its share
11 of the cost of the acquisition, construction, and equipping of a
12
public
safety training facility to
be jointly operated by a
13
joint
powers association consisting
of two or more municipal or
14
15
public corporations of which that city is a member. The
issuance of the bonds is subject to Minnesota Statutes, chapter
16
475, except that no election shall
be required except as
s 17
provided
in
section 2.
body of
a city of
18
Sec.
2.
[REVERSE REFERENDUM.]
19
Before
the adoption by
the governing
body of
a city of
any
20
resolution
authorizing the
issuance of any
bonds
authorized
by
2v section 1, the city shall publish a. notice in the official
22 newspaper of the city stating that the governing body of the
23 citv intends to consider the authorization of the issuance of
24 the bonds, stating the amount, purpose, and, in general, the
25 security and source of payment for' the bonds. The resolution
Section 2 1
-1ENT BY: 3 -21 -97 : 12:47 HOUSE OF REPS. 927 7645: 3/ 3
03/20/97 (REVISOR ) RJS /CR 97 -3354
1 authorizing the issuance of the bonds shall not be adopted by
2 the governing body of the city for at least 15 days after
3 publication of the notice of intention. If within 15 days after
4 publication of the notice of intention a petition asking for an
5 election on the proposition that the city issue the bonds signed
6 by the voters equal to at least ten percent of the registered
7 voters in the city is filed with the clerk, no bonds may be
8 issued by the city unless approved by a majority of the voters
9 of the city voting on the question of the issuance at a regular
10 or special election.
11 Sec. 3. [EFFECTIVE DATE; LOCAL APPROVAL.]
12 This act is effective with res ect to an of the cities of
13 Bloomington, Chanhassen, Eden Prairie, Edina, and Richfield the
14 day after compliance by that city with Minnesota Statutes,
15 section 645.021, subdivision 3.
645.01 LNTERPRETATION OF STATUTES 510
Z
Subd. 3. "Legislature" means the senate and the house of representatives of the state of
Mending the applic:
Minnesota.
:went units,
History: 1941 c 492 s 1; 1988 c 479 s 5
= i:_w A law which
,000 people.
645.02 EFFECTIVE DATE AND TIME OF LAWS.
t'' Subd. 2. A spec
Each act, except one making appropriations, enacted finally at any session of the legis-
August 1 next fol
lature takes effect on August 1 next following its final enactment, unless a different date is
yaw.
specified in the act. A special law required to be approved by the local government unit af-
Subd. 3. Subdi%
fected before it goes into effect becomes effective as to the approving unit the day following
the 1967 and all s
the day on which the certificate of approval prescribed by section 645.021 is filed with the
; - History 1967
secretary of state, unless a later date is specified in the act. When approval of such a special
,.
law is required by two or more local government units before it may become effective, the
' �-
024 SPECIAL
day after the day when the last of the required certificates is filed is the effective date, unless a
�3ection
later date is specified in the act.
645.02
An appropriation act or an act having appropriation items enacted finally at any session
eupon the approv
of the legislature takes effect at the beginning of the first day of July next following its final
or the goverr
enactment. unless a different date is specified in the act.
Each act takes effect at 12:01 a.m. on the day it becomes effective, unless a different
History: 1967
time is specified in the act.
't' " [Repealed,
History: 1941 c 492 s 2; 1959 c 368 s 4; 1971 c 196 s 1; 1987 c 384 art I s 48
'
04 j[Repealed,
645.021 SPECIAL LAWS; LOCAL APPROVAL, CERTIFICATES.''
A5 [Repealed,
Subdivision 1. A special law as defined in the Minnesota Constitution, article XII, sec-
[Rej ,
tion 2, shall name the local government unit to which it applies. If a special law applies to a
group of local government units in a single county or in a number of contiguous counties. it
.07 [Repealed,
shall be sufficient if the law names the county or counties where the affected units are situat-
;h;,•,_
ed.
1 STANDA
Subd. 2. A special law shall not be effective without approval of the local government
Every mentior
unit or units affected, except as provided in section 645.023. Approval shall be by resolution
"ce to and in ;
adopted by a majority vote of all members of the governing body of the unit unless another
law. No dep
method of approval is specified by the particular special law.
'other time or ad
Subd. 3. The chief clerical officer of a local government unit shall. as soon as the unit has
standard tin
approved a special law, file with the secretary of state a certificate stating the essential facts
' ..:_., ry: Exlc
necessary to valid approval, including a copy of the resolution of approval or, if submitted to
'
the voters, the number of votes cast for and against approval at the election. The form of the
certificate shall be prescribed by the attorney general and copies shall be furnished by the
secretary of state. If a local government unit fails to file a certificate of approval before the
fit
first day of the next regular session of the legislature, the law ig deemed to be disapproved by
CANONS
such unit unless otherwise provided in the special law.
Subd. 4. Laws 1959, chapter 368, does not apply to any special law heretofore enacted.
construing t
whether or not it has been approved by the local government unit affected, but such unit shall
ess their obi
{the legislatu
file with the secretary of state a certificate of approval for such law as required in subdivision
Words and
3
'bb tnmon and r
History: 1959 c 368 s 1,2; 1979 c 176 s I
a special t
645.023 SPECIAL LAWS; ENACTMENT WITHOUT LOCAL APPROVAL; EF•
g or
FECTIVE DATE.
)The singul
other gt
Subdivision 1. A special law enacted pursuant to the provisions of the Constitution. ar- -
General w,
ticle XII, section 2, shall become effective without the approval of any affected local govern*
ment unit or group of such units in a single county or a number of contiguous counties if the
ate''
-'n a
law is in any of the following classes:
(a) A law which enables one or more local government units to exercise authority not
a s:
..A
granted by general law. :r
_ L _ •�i}.
(b) A law which brings a local government unit within the general law by repealing a
special law, by removing an exception to the applicability of a general statutory provision. by
T%
. ry: 194,
REPORUREC OMMENDATION
TO: Mayor & Council Members
FROM: Susan Heiberg
DATE: December 15,1997
SUBJECT: SHeRPA's JOINT POWERS
AGREEMENT & FSC AGREEMENT
Recommendation:
Agenda Item VI.C.
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends
Action
❑
To HRA
0
To Council
❑
Motion
0
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
That the Edina City Council approve the revised South Hennepin Regional Planning Agency's (SHeRPA)
Joint Powers Agreement and the separate Family Services Collaborative (FSC) Agreement. THIS WILL
BE DISCUSSED PRELIIVIINARILY AT THE JOINT MEETING OF THE HUMAN RELATIONS
COMMISSION /CITY COUNCIL AT 5:30 PM.
Background:
The SHeRPA Board /Interim Family Services Collaborative (FSC) Board initially considered an agreement
that combined the research, planning and coordinating functions of the South Hennepin Regional Planning
Agency and the FSC. The Board moved away from this idea because Hennepin County saw it as a conflict
of interest if it, as a contractor of services with SHeRPA, were a party to an agreement that included the
Agency's research, planning and coordinating function. The SHeRPA and FSC, are now two separate
agreements but are linked together in two important ways:
• The FSC Agreement specifies that the FSC will contract with SHeRPA for administrative and
coordinating services.
• The members of the SHeRPA Board must also be members of the FSC Board.
The purposes of this linkage are: 1) to avoid duplication of administrative overhead for a new organization;
2) to ensure the integration of SHeRPA's research„ planning and coordinating functions and the Family
Services Collaborative where appropriate; and 3) to streamline the governing boards of SHeRPA and the
FSC. The SHeRPA Agreement has been revised authorizing SHeRPA to provide administrative and
coordination services to the FSC and to enter into the South Hennepin FSC Agreement on behalf of its
members. The four south Hennepin school districts, Hennepin County and CASH are .the additional parties
to the FSC Agreement.
Key Features of the South Hennepin Regional Planning Agency Agreement
Parties Cities of Bloomington, Eden Prairie, Edina and Richfield. School districts
may join at any time.
Purpose Provide human services research, planning and coordination to member
organizations
• Provide administrative and coordination services to the South Hennepin
Family Services Collaborative
• Authorize member organizations to enter into a family services collaborative
agreement
Governing Board City managers of member cities
Advisory An advisory body may be established. The present Commission is inactive
Commission due to the work of the Family Services Collaborative, but is expected to be
reconvened in 1998. Current composition includes 3 representatives from
each community, including one city council representative and two
representatives from existing city commissions. The Commission's
composition may be reconsidered before it reconvenes.
Financial Determined annually by each member. Current contribution is $18,400 per
Contributions' member.
Other Key Family Services Collaborative
Agreements
A
Execution copy
SOUTH HENNEPIN REGIONAL PLANNING AGENCY
JOINT AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR
RESEARCH, PLANNING AND COORDINATION OF HUMAN SERVICES
I. PARTIES
The parties to this Agreement are the cities of Bloomington, Eden Prairie, Edina and
Richfield. This Agreement is made pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59, subdivisions
I and 11.
II. GENERAL PURPOSE
Section 2.1. The parties have formed this Agreement for the purpose of providing an
organization to accomplish the following:
(a) To provide human services research, planning and coordination, both public and
private, throughout the territory of the parties to this Agreement; and
(b) To enable participation in and the provision of administrative and coordination
services to a family services collaborative, as authorized by Minn. Stat. §
121.8355, to monitor and address human service needs and provide coordinated
family services.
Section 2.2. The organization formed by this Agreement shall not be used or operated
for the pecuniary gain, directly or indirectly, of any parry or any member of its board. The
organization shall not participate or intervene in a political campaign on behalf of any candidate
for public office.
III. NAME
The name of the organization created by this Agreement is South Hennepin Regional
Planning Agency. The name may be changed in accordance with Section 14.1 of this Agreement.
CAH128867
RC145 -327
IV. DEFINITIONS
Section 4.1. For the purpose of this Agreement, the terms defined in this section have the
meanings given them.
Section 4.2. "South Hennepin Regional Planning Agency" or "Agency" means the
organization created pursuant to this Agreement.
Section 4.3. "Board" means the board of directors of the Agency, as established under
Section 6.1 of this Agreement.
Section 4.4. "Governing Body" means the policy - making and decision - making body of
a member that has the authority to enter into contracts of this type. For example, with respect
to a city, it means the city council; with respect to a school district, it means the school board.
Section 4.5. "Governmental unit" means any political subdivision of the State of
Minnesota including, but not limited to, a home rule charter or statutory city, or school district.
Section 4.6. "Human services" includes but is not limited to services and facilities to deal
with and serve human needs.
V. MEMBERSHIP
Section 5.1. Any governmental unit located in the metropolitan area is eligible to be a
member of the Agency.
Section 5.2. The initial members of the Agency are: City of Bloomington, a home rule
charter city and public health entity; City of Eden Prairie, a statutory city; City of Edina, a
statutory city; and City of Richfield, a home rule charter city.
Section 5.3. A governmental unit may enter into this Agreement by resolution of its
governing body and by execution of a copy of this Agreement by its proper officers. The
governmental unit or private entity must file an executed copy of the Agreement and a certified
copy of the authorizing resolution with the City Clerk of the City of Richfield. For governmental
CAH128867
RC145 -327 2
units, the resolution authorizing the execution of the agreement must also designate the first
director to serve as the member's representative on the Board.
Section 5.4. A governmental unit wishing to become a member after the effective date
of this agreement may be admitted only upon the favorable vote of two- thirds of the votes of the
Board present and voting at any regular or special meeting. The Board may, in its by -laws,
impose conditions upon the admission of additional members.
Section 5.5. A change in the governmental boundaries, structure, classification or
organization of a governmental unit does not affect the "eligibility of a governmental unit to
become or remain a member of the Agency.
VI. BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Section 6.1. The governing body of the Agency is its Board of Directors. Each member
is entitled to one director on the Board. Each director is entitled to one vote.
Section 6.2. A director is appointed by resolution of the governing body of the member.
A director serves until a successor is appointed and qualifies. Directors serve without
compensation from the Agency, but nothing in this section is to be construed to prevent a
governmental unit from compensating its director for service on the Board if such compensation
is otherwise authorized by law.
Section 6.3. Vacancies in the office of director will exist for any of the reasons set forth
in Minnesota Statutes, section 351.02, or upon a revocation of a director's appointment by the
appointing member duly filed with the Agency. Vacancies are filled by resolution of the
governing body of the member whose position on the Board is vacant.
Section 6.4. A majority of the votes of the Board of Directors constitutes a quorum.
VII. EFFECTIVE DATE; ORGANIZATIONAL MATTERS
CAH128867 3
RC14s -327
Section 7. 1. This Agreement is effective on the date when the last of the executed
agreements and authorizing resolutions of all of the initial members listed in Section 5.2 of this
Agreement has been filed as provided in Section 5.3 of this Agreement.
Section 7.2. Within 30 days after the effective date of this agreement, the director
appointed in the authorizing resolution of the City of Richfield must call the first meeting of the
Board, which meeting must be held no later than 60 days after the effective date of this
agreement.
Section 7.3. The first meeting of the Board will be the organizational meeting of the
Agency. At the organizational meeting, and at each annual meeting thereafter, the Board must
elect from among the directors a chair, a vice - chair, and a secretary- treasurer. More than one
office may be held by a director.
Section 7.4. At the organizational meeting, or as soon thereafter as it may reasonably be
done, the Board must adopt by -laws governing its procedures, including the time, place, notice
for and frequency of its regular meetings, procedure for calling special meetings, and such other
matters as are required by this Agreement. The Board may amend the by -laws from time to time.
The Board must meet at least once each year and on such other dates as may be provided in its
by -laws. The annual meeting is held in the month of May unless otherwise provided in the by-
laws.
Section 7.5. The Board may create an executive committee and other committees as it
may deem necessary pursuant to its by -laws. The executive committee may be authorized to
exercise specified powers of the board of directors between Board meetings, subject to the
limitations imposed upon it by the Board.
Section 7.7. The Board may create advisory councils as it deems necessary pursuant to
its by -laws.
CM128867
RC145 -327 4
VIII. POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Section 8.1. The powers and duties of the Board of Directors include the powers set forth
in this Article.
Section 8.2. It may employ a person to act as director. of the Agency.
Section 8.3. It may make such contracts as are necessary to effectuate the purposes of
this Agreement.
Section 8.4. It may employ such other persons as it deems necessary to accomplish its
powers and responsibilities. Persons may be employed on a full -time, part-time or consulting
basis, as the Board determines.
Section 8.5. It may apply for and receive financial support in the form of grants from any
organization or agency in order to accomplish its purposes and may enter into the agreements
necessary to obtain the support.
Section 8.6. It may invest and reinvest funds not needed for current operating expenses,
if any, in the manner applicable by law to statutory cities. The Agency may not incur obligations
in excess of funds available to it.
Section 8.7. It may contract for space, materials and supplies.
Section 8.8. It must make a financial accounting and report to the parties at least once
each year. Its books and records shall be available and open to examination to authorized
representatives of the parties at all reasonable times.
Section 8.9. It shall secure insurance to protect the Agency, the Board, the officers and
employees of the Agency and the parties in such form and amount as are agreed by all parties.
Section 8.10. It shall establish policies and procedures with respect to the creation,
collection, maintenance, and dissemination of government data, as may be required by applicable
federal and state law.
CAH128867 5
RC145 -327
Section 8.11. It may prepare an inventory of human service facilities, services and
agencies, both public and private, available to persons residing in the corporate limits of the
Agency's governmental unit members. It may make a cost analysis of any existing or proposed
human services programs, may call attention to human service needs and human services
programs and may undertake to coordinate human services programs, public and private, within
the territory of the Agency's governmental unit members.
Section 8.12. It may conduct research and investigation regarding any and all human
services related needs and develop proposed plans for coordinating and/or providing human
services. Human services related issues include but are not limited to mental health, family
counseling, developmental disabilities, chemical health, domestic abuse, income supports/basic
needs, employment and training, child and adult welfare, immigration, juvenile deliquency, senior
citizens, and transportation.
Section 8.13. It may enter into a family services collaborative agreement with other
governmental and private entities pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 121.8355, for the purpose of forming
a family services collaborative; provided, that any such collaborative agreement must provide that
each of the directors on the Agency's Board shall also be a member of the collaborative's board
of directors. It may, pursuant to such an agreement, contractually commit to annually provide
a minimum cash or in -kind contribution to the family services collaborative, provided that the
minimum contribution equals at least $500.00 times the number of members of the Agency.
Section 8.14. It may contract with a family services collaborative established under Minn.
Stat. § 121.8355 to provide administrative and coordination services and such other services as
may be necessary to further the goals and objectives of the family services collaborative.
Section 8.15. It may exercise any other power necessary and convenient to the
implementation of its powers and duties under the provisions of this Agreement.
CAH128867
RC145 -327 6
Section 8.16. The Agency shall not discriminate on the basis of sex, race, creed, national
origin, color, religion, age, or disability, and will conform to all applicable State and Federal laws
and regulations including, without limitation, the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §
12 10 1, et seq.
IX. OFFICERS
Section 9.1. The officers of the Board are a chair, a vice - chair, and a secretary- treasurer
elected by the Board for a term of one year and until their respective successors are elected and
qualify, at the annual meeting. New officers take office at the adjournment of the annual meeting
at which they were elected. An officer must be a duly qualified and appointed director.
Section 9.2. A vacancy in the office of chair, vice - chair, or secretary- treasurer occurs for
any of the reasons for which a vacancy in the office of director occurs. Vacancies in these
offices are filled by the Board for the unexpired portion of the term.
Section 9.3. The chair presides at meetings of the Board. The vice -chair acts as chairman
in the absence, disqualification or disability of the chairman.
Section 9.4. The secretary- treasurer is responsible for keeping a record of the proceedings
of the Board, for custody of funds, for keeping of financial records of the Agency and for such
other duties as may be assigned to the secretary- treasurer by the Board. Persons may be
employed to perform such services under the supervision and direction of the secretary- treasurer
as may be authorized by the Board. The secretary- treasurer must post a fidelity bond or other
insurance against loss of Agency funds in the amount specified by the Board, the cost of such
bond or insurance to be paid by the Board. The Board may provide for compensation of the
secretary- treasurer for services to the Board.
Section 9.5. In its by -laws, the Board may establish such other offices as it deems
necessary, in addition to those set forth in this Article IX.
CM128867
RC145 -327
X. FINANCIAL MATTERS
Section 10.1. The fiscal year of the Agency is the calendar year.
Section 10.2. Agency funds may be expended by the Board in accordance with the
procedures established by law for the expenditure of funds by statutory cities. Orden, checks and
drafts shall be signed, and other legal instruments shall be executed on behalf of the Agency as
provided in the by -laws.
Section 10.3. Contracts shall be let and purchases made in conformance with the legal
requirements applicable to contracts and purchases of optional Plan B cities and for such purposes
the executive director, if any, shall be deemed to occupy a position equivalent to that of a city
manager. Any contract in excess of $10,000.00 must be approved by a two thirds majority of
the Board.
Section 10.4. The Board (1) is strictly accountable for all funds received and for funds
expended by it, (2) must have an annual audit of its books, and (3) must make an annual report
of all of its receipts and disbursements to each of the parties.
Section 10.5. The Board must formulate a proposed annual budget for the Agency and
submit it to the parties on or before June 1 for their approval. The budget shall be deemed
approved by a party unless, prior to July 1 of the year involved, the party gives notice in writing
to the Agency that it does not approve the budget. The budget shall be revised and resubmitted
to the parties until it is approved by all parties. Final action adopting an annual budget shall be
taken by the Board on or before September 1. The parties shall be obligated to pay the amount
specified as their contribution in the budget unless that party has withdrawn pursuant to Article
XI.
Section 10.6. Except as authorized by law, no member of the Board or other public
officer of the organization who is authorized to take part in any manner in the making of any
CAH128867
RC145 -327 p O
sale, lease or contract may voluntarily have a personal financial interest in such transaction or
personally benefit financially therefrom.
XI. DURATION AND DISSOLUTION
Section 11.1. The Agency will exist, and this agreement is in effect, for an indefinite
term until dissolved in accordance with Section 11.3 of this article.
Section 11.2. A member may withdraw from the Agency effective as of December 31
of any year by filing a written notice with the secretary- treasurer at or prior to the Board's annual
meeting in May of such year. However, any member which is a public school district shall
comply with Minn. Stat. § 123.35, subd. 19a and notify the Agency members of its intent to
withdraw on or before February 1 of any year, and the withdrawal shall be effective June 30 of
the same year. A withdrawing member shall be obligated to pay the Agency its budgeted
contribution for the year in which the notice of withdrawal is given. The withdrawing party shall
continue to be a party, to this Agreement until the effective date of such notice of withdrawal.
A notice of withdrawal may be rescinded at any time by a member. If a member withdraws
before dissolution of the Agency, the member will have no claim on the assets of the Agency.
Section 11.3. The Agency must be dissolved whenever the withdrawal of a member
reduces total membership in the Agency to less than three. The Agency may be dissolved at any .
time by unanimous vote of all the members of the Board of Directors.
Section 11.4. In the event of dissolution, the Board must determine the measures
necessary to effect the dissolution and provide for the taking of such measures as promptly as
circumstances permit, subject to the provisions of this Agreement. Upon dissolution of the
Agency all remaining assets of the Agency, after payment of obligations, must be distributed
among the then existing members in proportion to their respective contributions. If there have
been no contributions by any party, surplus monies of the Agency shall, upon termination of the
CAH_28867
RC145 -327 9
Agency, be returned to the parties in equal shares. The Agency will continue to exist after
dissolution for the period, no longer than six months, necessary to wind up its affairs but for no
other purpose.
X11. TRANSITIONAL AND MISCELLANEOUS MATTERS
Section 12.1. The name of the organization created by this Agreement may be changed
when deemed appropriate by the Board, but only upon a 75% majority vote of all the votes of
the Board of Directors taken at a regular meeting of the Board or by written action. If the name
of the organization. is so changed, the Board must provide in its by -laws for necessary measures
to effect the change in official and unofficial documents, papers, and other essential respects.
Section 12.2. It is the intention of the parties to this Agreement that the organization
created hereby is the successor to the South Hennepin Regional Planning Agency in existence on
the day prior to the effective date of this Agreement. It is further the intention of the parties that
any funds made available to the organization created by this Agreement from the assets of the
prior South Hennepin Regional Planning Agency must be used exclusively for the purposes of
this Agreement. The adopted budget of the prior South Hennepin Regional Planning Agency
remains in effect until revised and until the new annual budget is adopted. The adoption of this
Agreement does not affect or modify the obligation of members of the prior South Hennepin
Regional Planning Agency to make contributions authorized by the 'prior South Hennepin
Regional Planning Agency.
CAH128867
RC145 -327 10
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned governmental unit or private entity has caused
this Agreement to be executed by its duly authorized officers and delivered on its behalf.
By
Its
By
Its
Dated: , 199
Filed in the office of the of this day of
, 199.
CM128867 11
RC145 -327
Key Features of the South Hennepin Family Services Collaborative
Agreement
Parties SHeRPA (municipalities of Bloomington, Edina, Eden Prairie and Richfield)
• School Districts of Bloomington, Edina, Eden Prairie and Richfield
• Hennepin County
• Community Action For Suburban Hennepin (CASH)
Purpose To create and manage a family services collaborative in South Hennepin Cou
• Contract with the South Hennepin Regional Planning Agency (SHeRPA) to
provide administrative and coordination services to the FSC.
Governing Board • 4 city managers
• 4 school district superintendents
• Hennepin County representative
• CASH representative
The FSC Board will hold joint meetings with the SHeRPA Board (4 city
managers).
Advisory Council Five representatives from each community (I city, 1 school, 2 parents/youth/s
1 faith community/informal community support)
• One Bloomington Public Health representative
• CASH representative
• 2 other representatives of MOU providers
• Hennepin County representative
• Business representative
Financial • Minimum annual $500.00 cash or in -kind contribution
Contributions
Other Key Memorandum of Understanding between the FSC and private providers
Agreements participating in the Collaborative. This agreement establishes the commitmen
providers make to the Family Support Network regarding their participation i
Collaborative's shared intake process and client database, service coordination
through Family Support Teams, staffing for CRCs, and developing/enhancing
strength -based and early intervention practices.
This agreement will also be used to reflect the operational commitments by
members of this FSC Agreement (the cities, school districts, Hennepin Count
CASH).
Countywide Local Collaborative Time Study/Revenue Enhancement
Agreements • Alliance for Families and Children for countywide inter - collaborative service
coordination
Execution copy
FAMILY SERVICES COLLABORATIVE AGREEMENT
I. PARTIES
The parties to this Agreement are South Hennepin Regional Planning Agency, County of
Hennepin, Independent School District Nos. 271,.272, 273 and 280, and Community Action for
Suburban Hennepin. This Agreement is made pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 121.8355.
II. DEFINITIONS
Section 2.1. For the purpose of this Agreement, the terms defined in this section have the
meanings given them.
Section 2.2. "South Hennepin Regional Planning Agency" or "SHeRPA" means that
certain joint powers organization initially formed by the cities of Bloomington, Eden Prairie,
Edina, and Richfield. Changes in SHeRPA's membership will not affect this Agreement, except
as provided at Section 10.3 of this Agreement.
Section 2.3. "Board" means the board of directors of the Collaborative, as established
under Section 5.1 of this Agreement.
Section 2.4. "Collaborative" means the family services collaborative created by this
Agreement.
Section 2.5. - "Governing Body" means the policy- making and decision - making body of
a member that has the authority to enter into contracts of this type. For example, with respect
to SHeRPA, it means the board of directors of SHeRPA; with respect to a county, it means the
county board; and, with respect to a school district, it means the school board.
Section 2.6. "Governmental unit" means any political subdivision of the State of
Minnesota including, but not limited to, a home rule charter or statutory city, county, school
V*1128825
RC145 -327
district, public health entity, community action agency as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section
268.53 (other than a private nonprofit agency), public library, other agency of local government,
or a joint powers entity formed by two or more political subdivisions of the State.
Section 2.7. "Private entity" means any private corporation, agency, association or
foundation that provides human services to individuals and families, including, but not limited
to, a private nonprofit community action agency under Minnesota Statutes, Section 268.53.
Section 2.8. "Human services" includes but is not limited to services and facilities to deal
with and serve human needs.
III. GENERAL PURPOSE
Section 3.1. The parties have formed this Agreement for the purpose of establishing and
operating a family services collaborative, as authorized by Minnesota Statutes Section 121.8355,
to monitor and address human service needs and provide coordinated family services. The
organization created by this Agreement shall be a family services collaborative (the "Collabora-
tive ").
IV. MEMBERSHIP
Section 4.1. Any governmental unit or private entity as specified in Minn. Stat. §
121.8355, subd. 1(a) and located in the metropolitan area is eligible to be a signator to this
Agreement, subject to the requirements of this Article IV.
Section 4.2. The initial governmental unit members of the Collaborative are: South
Hennepin Regional Planning Agency, a joint powers entity (SHeRPA is the public health entity
member of this collaborative); County of Hennepin, a county; Independent School District No.
271, a school district; Independent School District No. 272, a school district; Independent School
District No. 273, a school district; and Independent School District No. 280, a school district.
CAH129625 2
RC145 -327
The initial private entity member is Community Action for Suburban Hennepin, a Minnesota
nonprofit corporation.
Section 4.3. A governmental unit or private entity may become a member of the
Collaborative by resolution of its governing body and/or by execution of a copy of this
Agreement by its properly authorized officers. The governmental unit or private entity must file
an executed copy of the Agreement and a certified copy of the authorizing resolution with the
executive director of SHeRPA.
Section 4.4. A governmental unit or private entity wishing to become a member after the
effective date of this agreement may be admitted only upon the favorable vote of two - thirds of
the votes of the entire Board.
Section 4.5. A change in the governmental boundaries, structure, classification or
organization of a governmental unit does not affect the eligibility of a governmental unit to
become or remain a member of the Collaborative.
V. BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Section 5.1. The governing body of the Collaborative is its Board of Directors. Except
as provided in Section 5.5 of this Agreement, each member is entitled to one director on the
Board. Each director is entitled to one vote. The Board establishes policies and objectives in
accordance with Minn. Stat. § 121.8355. It may exercise all of the powers and shall perform all
of the duties specified in Minn. Stat. § 121.8355 and Article VII of this Agreement.
Section 5.2. For governmental unit members, each member's director is appointed by the
governmental unit member. After considering recommendations from the private entity members,
the directors for the governmental unit members shall select one director to serve as a
representative of Community Action for Suburban Hennepin and one director to serve as a
representative of all other private entity members.
CAH128825
RC145 -327 3
Section 5.3. A director serves until a successor is appointed and qualifies. Directors serve
without compensation from the Collaborative, but nothing in this section is to be construed to
prevent'a member from compensating its director for service on the Board if such compensation
is otherwise authorized by law.
Section 5.4. Vacancies in the office of director will exist for any of the reasons set forth
in Minnesota Statutes, section 351.02, or upon a revocation of a director's appointment by the
appointing member. Vacancies are filled by appointment by the member whose position on the
Board is vacant.
Section 5.5. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Article V to the contrary,
appointment of directors for SHeRPA shall be governed by this Section 5.5. SHeRPA shall have
one director on the Board for each of its members. Each director appointed by SHeRPA must
be a member of SHeRPA's governing body.
Section 5.6. A majority of the Board of Directors constitutes a quorum.
VI. EFFECTIVE DATE; ORGANIZATIONAL MATTERS
Section 6.1. This Agreement is effective on the date when the last of the executed
agreements and authorizing resolutions of all of the initial members listed in Section 4.2 of this
Agreement has been filed as provided in Section 4.3 of this Agreement.
Section 6.2. Within 30 days after the effective date of this agreement, a director
appointed by SHeRPA must call the first meeting of the Board. The first meeting of the Board
will be the organizational meeting of the Collaborative. At the organizational meeting, and at
each annual meeting thereafter, the Board must elect from among the directors a chair, a vice-
chair, and a secretary- treasurer.
Section 6.3. The Board may create an executive committee and other committees as it
may deem necessary. The executive committee may be authorized to exercise specified powers
CAH128825 4
RC145 -327
of the board of directors between Board meetings, subject to limitations placed upon it by the
Board.
Section 6.4. The Board may create advisory councils as it deems necessary.
Section 6.5. At the organizational meeting and at each annual meeting thereafter, the
Board shall by resolution designate an official newspaper for the publication of its official
notices.
VII. POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE FAMILY SERVICES COLLABORATIVE
Section 7.1. The powers and duties of the Collaborative include the powers set forth in
this Article.
Section 7.2. It may exercise any of the powers and shall perform all of the duties
required of a family services collaborative, as provided in Minn. Stat. § 121.8355.
Section 7.3. It may make such contracts as are necessary to effectuate the purposes of
this Agreement. It is specifically anticipated that the Collaborative will contract with SHeRPA
to provide administrative services to the Collaborative.
, Section 7.4. It may employ such other persons as it deems necessary to accomplish its
powers and responsibilities. Persons may- be employed on a full -time, part-time or consulting
basis, as the Board determines.
Section 7.5. It may apply for and receive financial support in the form of grants from any
organization or agency in order to accomplish its purposes and may enter into the agreements
necessary to obtain the support.
Section 7.6. It may invest and,reinvest funds not needed for current operating expenses,
if any, in the manner applicable by law to statutory cities. The Collaborative may not incur
obligations in excess of funds available to it.
CAH128825
RC145 -327 5
Section 7:7., It,.must ,make a financial accounting and report to the parties at least once
each year. Its books and records shall. be available and open to examination to authorized
representatives .of the parties at all reasonable times. ,
Section 7.8. It may secure insurance to protect the Collaborative, the Board, the officers
and employees of the Collaborative and the members in .such -form and amount as deemed
necessary by the Board.
Section 7.9. It,shall establish, policies. and procedures with respect to the creation,
collection, maintenance, and dissemination of government data, as may be required by applicable
federal and state law.
Section 7.10. It may exercise any other power necessary and convenient to the
.implementation of its powers and duties under the provisions of this Agreement.
Section 7.11. The Collaborative will not discriminate on the basis 'of sex, race, creed,
national origin, color,, religion,.age, or disability, and will conform to all applicable State and
Federal laws and regulations, including without limitation the Americans with Disabilities Act,
42' U.S.C. §12101, et M., and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400.
VIII. OFFICERS
Section 8.1. The officers of the Board are a chair, a vice - chair, and a secretary- treasurer
elected by the Board fora term of one year and until their respective successors are elected and
qualify, at the annual meeting. New officers take office at the adjournment of the annual meeting
at which they, were elected. An officer must be a duly qualified `and appointed director.
Section 8.2. A vacancy in the office of chair, vice - chair, or secretary- treasurer occurs for
any of the reasons for which a vacancy in the office of director occurs. Vacancies in these
offices are filled by the Board for the unexpired portion of the term.
CAH12ee25 L
RC145 -327 V
Section 8.3. The chair presides at meetings of the Board. The vice -chair acts as chairman
in the absence, disqualification or disability of the chairman.
Section 8.4. The secretary- treasurer is responsible for keeping a record of the proceedings
of the Board, for custody of funds, for keeping of financial records of the Agency and for such
other duties as may be assigned to the secretary- treasurer by the Board. Persons may be
employed to perform such services under the supervision and direction of the secretary- treasurer
as may be authorized by the Board. The secretary- treasurer must post a fidelity bond or other
insurance against loss of Collaborative funds in the amount specified by the Board, the cost of
such bond or insurance to be paid by the Board.
IX. FINANCIAL MATTERS
Section 9.1. The fiscal year of the Collaborative is the calendar year.
Section 9.2. The Board shall establish an accounting fund for the Collaborative (the "FSC
Fund "). The FSC fund shall be an integrated fund, which may consist of federal, state, local or
private resources, including contributions from the members.
Section 9.3. With the exception of SHeRPA, each member must make annually a
minimum cash or in -kind contribution of $500.00 to the FSC Fund. SHeRPA's minimum cash
or in -kind contribution shall be determined by multiplying $500.00 times the number of directors
SHeRPA has on the Board.
Section 9.4. Collaborative funds may be expended by the Board in accordance with the
procedures established by law for the expenditure of funds by statutory cities. Orders, checks and
drafts shall be signed, and other legal instruments shall be executed on behalf of the Collaborative
by the chair and secretary- treasurer.
Section 9.5. Contracts shall be let and purchases made in conformance with the legal
requirements applicable to contracts and purchases of optional Plan B cities and for such purposes
CAH128825
RC145 -327 7
the secretary- treasurer shall be deemed to occupy a position equivalent to that of a city manager.
Any contract in excess of $10,000.00 must be approved by a two thirds majority of the Board.
Section 9.6. The Board (1) is strictly accountable for all funds received and for funds
expended by it, (2) must have an annual audit of its books, and (3) must make an annual report
of all of its receipts and disbursements to each of the parties.
Section 9.7. The Board must formulate a proposed annual budget for the Collaborative
and submit it to the parties on or before June 1 of the year preceding the budget year. The
budget shall be deemed approved by a party unless, prior to July 1 of that year, the party gives
notice in writing to the Collaborative that it does not approve the budget. The budget shall be
revised and resubmitted to the parties until it is approved. Final action adopting an annual budget
shall be taken by the Board on or before September 1. The parties shall be obligated to pay the
amount specified as their contribution in the budget unless that party has withdrawn pursuant to
Article X.
Section 9.8. Except as authorized by law, no member of the Board or other public officer
of the Collaborative who is authorized to take part in any manner in the making of any sale, lease
or contract may voluntarily have a personal financial interest in such transaction or personally
benefit financially therefrom.
X. DURATION AND DISSOLUTION
Section 10.1. The Collaborative will exist, and this Agreement is in effect, for an
indefinite term until dissolved in accordance with Section 10.3 of this article.
Section 10.2. A member may withdraw from the Collaborative effective as of December
31 of any year by filing a written notice with the secretary- treasurer at or prior to August 1 of
such year. However, any member which is a public school district shall comply with Minn. Stat.
§ 123.35, subd. 19a and notify the Collaborative members of its intent to withdraw on or before
CAH128825
RC145 -327 8
i
February 1 of any year, and the withdrawal shall be effective June 30 of the same year. A
withdrawing member shall be obligated to pay the Collaborative its budgeted contribution for the
year in which the notice of withdrawal is given. The withdrawing party shall continue to be a
party to this Agreement until the effective date of such notice of withdrawal. A notice of
withdrawal may be rescinded at any time by a member. If a member withdraws before
dissolution of the Collaborative, the member will have no claim on the assets of the Collabora-
tive.
Section 10.3. The Collaborative must be dissolved whenever the withdrawal of a member
reduces total membership in the Collaborative to less than the membership requirements specified
in Minn. Stat. § 121.8355. The Collaborative may be dissolved at any time by unanimous vote
of all- the members of the Board of Directors.
Section 10.4. In the event of dissolution, the Board must determine the measures
necessary to effect the dissolution and provide for the taking of such measures as promptly as
circumstances permit, subject to the provisions of this Agreement. Upon dissolution of the
Collaborative all remaining assets of the Collaborative, after payment of obligations, must be
distributed among the then existing members in proportion to their respective contributions. If
there have been no contributions by any party, surplus monies of the Collaborative shall, upon
termination of the Collaborative, shall be returned to the parties in equal shares. The
Collaborative will continue to exist after dissolution for the period, no longer than six months,
necessary to wind up its affairs but for no other purpose.
CAH128825
RC145 -327 9
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned governmental unit or private entity has caused
this Agreement to be executed by its duly authorized officers and delivered on its behalf.
Dated: , 199
Filed in the office of the
, 199.
CAH128825
RC145 -327 10
By
Its
By
Its
of
this day of
REPORUREC OMMENDATION
TO: Mayor & Council Members
FROM: Susan Heiberg
DATE: December 15, 1997
SUBJECT: ANNUAL MEETING -1998
Recommendation:
Agenda Item VI.D.
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
ElTo Council
Action 0 Motion
❑ Resolution
❑ Ordinance
❑ Discussion
If the City Council chooses to hold the Annual Meeting as it has for the past nine years,
that a date /time /place be selected from the following possibilities:
• 5:00 PM at Braemar on either Monday, March 23'd; Tuesday, March 24th;
Wednesday, March 25`h; or Thursday, March 26`h
• 5:00 PM at Centennial Lakes on either Monday, March 23'x; Wednesday, March 25`h;
or Thursday, March 26"
Background:
The Annual Meeting is an opportunity to gather the advisory boards /commissions to
thank them for their hard work, to welcome incoming commissioners, and to honor the
retirees. The Meeting has also provided time to discuss goals and objectives.
The event takes place over a full meal, and it has traditionally rotated between Braemar
Clubhouse and Centennial Lakes Centrum Building. Centennial Lakes was the selected
spot for both 1996 and 1997.
The Edina School District spring break for 1998 is March 27`h to April 6'h. Easter is April
12`h.
ow e
0
lees
REPORT/RECOM M EN DATION
To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
Agenda Item #
xn _A_
From: JOHN WALLIN
Consent El
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
Information Only
Date: DECEMBER 15, 1997
Mgr. Recommends F-]
To HRA
Subject:
®
To Council
ORDINANCE NO. 1997 -16,
Action 0
Motion
AMENDING CODE SECTION 185
F—]
Resolution
TO INCREASE CERTAIN FEES
®
Ordinance
0
Discussion
Recommendation:
Approve Ordinance No.1997 -16.
Info /Background:
At the meeting of December 1, 1997, the Council adopted First Reading of the Fees
and Charges Ordinance. This is for Second Reading and approval of the Ordinance.
Attached are the following schedules of Fees and charges by Ordinance, proposed for
1998.
1. Schedule 1 reflects all fees and charges by Ordinance for the General Fund and
Utility fund. The fees, with proposed changes are highlighted in black. This schedule
also provides a listing of forecasted volumes for 1997 and 1998. The combination of
rate increases and volume changes reflect the 3% increase that was discussed
during the budget assumption process.
2. Schedule 2 reflects the format necessary to adopt the proposed changes into the
Ordinance.
SCHEDULE 1
9z�.1� CITY OF EDINA
i
y°. e o . SCHEDULE OF FEES AND CHARGES BY M ORDINANCE
J FOR THE GENERAL FUND AND UTILITY FUND
# OF
1997 # OF
1998
FEE NO.
FEES
PERMITS
1 FEE PERMITS]
FEE
SPRINKLER PERMIT:
-
110 7117
SPRINKLER PERMIT
200
;
190
90.00
0
,
118
119
120
FIRE PUMP INSTALL
STANDPIPE INSTALL ONLY
EACH ADDITIONAL.
GAS PUMP, TANK & BURN:
95 -98
105
121
SPECIAL HAZARD 35
GREASE VENT j 65
FIRE ALARM SYST 301
60.00,
STATE CODE
35
5
STATE CODE
100
FIRE EXT SERV
125
FALSE ALARMS
g
,
85
SIGN PERMIT
120
60.00
80
60.00
86
BENCH COURTESY
12.00
57
12.00
87
SIGN VARIANCE -RES.
125.00
125.00
88
SIGN VARIANCE -COMM
250.00
250.00
PLANNING FEES:.
160
NBR PROPERTY OWNER
-450
$1 /OWNER
400
$1 /OWNER
180
RESTRICTED PARKING
1
500.00
1
500.00
181,
0 -50 SPACES
100.00
100:00
182
51 -100 SPACES,
150.00
150.00
183
100 -200 SPACES
250.00
250.00
184
OVER 200 SPACES
400.00
400.00
192 -194
REZONING
3
400.00 - 750.00
3
400.00 - 750.00
195
RETAIL, SALE IN PID
4
300.00
1
300.00
196
CONDO USE PERMIT.
1
.500.00
1
500.00
199
FINAL DEVL PLAN
5
500.001
4
500.00
16.1
LOT DIVISION
7
imool,
4
100.00
162:
SUBDIVISION
7
400 + $50 /LOT
4
400 + $50 /LOT
163
DEVELOPER FEE/PLAN A
6.5% TOTAL COST
6:5% TOTAL COST
VARIANCE
190
RESIDENTIAL
60
150.00
50
150.00
191
COMMERCIAL
10
250.00
3
250.00
25,198
LANDSCAPING
10
100.00
10
100.00
197
TEMPORARY CORD- USE
5
75.00
1
75.00
170
VACATION APPLICATIONS
6
100.00
3
200.00
230.
VARIANCE FOR RV STORAGE
3
50.00
1
50.00
V
Page 1
SCHEDULE 1 r
CITY OF EDINA
SCHEDULE OF FEES AND CHARGES BY ;` ORDINANCE''
FOR THE GENERAL FUND AND UTILITY FUND
Page ,2 .
285 BUSINESS, MASSAGE LICENSE
# OF
1997
# OF
1998,
FEE NO. FEES
PERMITS
FEE-
PERMITS
FEE
286a 'ADDITIONAL LOCATION
6
25.00
2
25.00
287 INVEST FEE - INDIV. LIC.
5
65.00
12
65.00
288 INVEST FEE - BUSINESS LIC.
220 FALSE ALARM
490
100.00
_ 5101
100.00
0
200.001
01
, 200.00
289a INVEST FEE - SEXUALLY ORIENTED
DOG & IMPOUNDING, FEES:.
1500.00
01
1500.00
IMPOUNDING:
15 DAILY CARE
100
15.001
100.
15.00
16. FIRST OFFENSEIYR.
140
35.00.
140
35.00
17 SECOND OFFENSE/YR.
4
60.001
4
60.00
18 THIRD OFFENSE/YR.
1
110.00
1
110.00
19 DISPOSAL
8
15.00
81
15.00
20 DOG LICENSE
1001
25.00
100'
25.00
20 NEUTERED LICENSE
300
12.00
:3001
12.00
22 DUPLICATE LICENSE
101
6.00
101
6.00
23 KENNEL LICENSE
0
55.00
ol
55.00
24 EXTRA DOG OR CAT
1
100.001
1
i . 100.00
21 DOG LICENSE RENEWAL
50
11.00
501
11.00
21 DOG LICENSE RENEW S/N
150
8.00
1501
8.00
21a LATE CHARGE .
NA
25.00.
NA
25.00
21a LATE CHARGE/SPAYED
NA
12.00
NA
12 OC
Page ,2 .
285 BUSINESS, MASSAGE LICENSE
0
200.00
0
200.00
286 INDIV. MASSAGE LICENSE
25
65.00
30
65.00
286a 'ADDITIONAL LOCATION
6
25.00
2
25.00
287 INVEST FEE - INDIV. LIC.
5
65.00
12
65.00
288 INVEST FEE - BUSINESS LIC.
0
1500.001
0
1500.00
289 SEXUALLY ORIENTED BUSINESS
0
200.001
01
, 200.00
289a INVEST FEE - SEXUALLY ORIENTED
0
1500.00
01
1500.00
Page ,2 .
l
SCHEDULEI
_
I I �
A.
9��r'��, CITY OF EDINA
o e SCHEDULE OF FEES AND CHARGES BY ORDINANCE=,
o �.
FOR THE GENERAL FUND AND UTILITY FUND
• i
# OF j
1997
# OF
1998
FEE NO.
1 FEES
PERMITS
FEE I PERMITS
FEE
'AMUSEMENT
1
PUBLIC DANCE
0
35.001
0
35.00
5
-LAWFUL GAMBLING
MECH. AMUSE DEVICE LOCAT
EACH MACHINE
LOUDSPEAKER PERMIT
COMMERCIAL PHOTOGRAPHY
3
I 224
7
10.00,
, ,
9
7
244
10.00
45.00'
7.00
11.00
10
11
225
290a
COUNCIL APPROVED
i
0
11 11
290b
MANAGER APPROVE MOTION
8
f e l l
290c
MANAGER APPROVE STILL
265
PARKING PERMIT
NA
$3.00 /MONTH; NA
.
$3.00/MONTH
266
REFUND ON STICKER
NA
$3.00 /MONTH NA
$3.00/MONTH
�
I
HEALTH:
17
POOL, SPA, AND GARAGE
j
81
82
INDOOR SWIM POOL
OUTDOOR SWIM POOL
25
31
13
1001
• , , ,
35.001----=l
31
370.00
200.00'
35.00
83
157
WHIRLPOOL
PARKING GARAGE LICENSE
158
I PARKING GARAGE INSPECTION
251
65.001
30
. 65.00
i
FOOD & SOFT DRINKS:
130
I
SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYS.
0l
30.001
0
30.00
135
1
FOOD ESTABLISHMENT
gp
NA
, , , IIIIIIIEp
„
94
135
MANAGER CERTIFIED
135
ADDED FACILITY
20 14
136
DAY CARE LIMITED FOOD
2 , , 14
137
TAKE OUT FOOD
30
1
, , ,
, , , ,
0
20
137
MANAGER CERTIFIED
138
PACKAGED FOOD
1
0
0
,
0
0
139
FOOD WAREHOUSE
140
CATERING FOOD EST
545.00
495.001
140
MANAGER CERTIFIED
NA , , , 7
140
ADDED FACILITY
p
30
„
90.001
0,
301
90.00
141
'ITINERANT FOOD EST
142.
I
RETAIL CANDY SHOP
0
M
3
10.00
142
ADDITIONAL FACILITY
10.001 0
143
144
POTENTIALLY HAZARDS VEHICLE
FLEET OF 5 OR MORE
5
0
0
0
NA
--90-0-
105.00
525.00
190.00
40.00
105.00
525.00
, ,
15.00
0
0
6
0
0
220
110.00
145
CATERING VEHICLE
200.0a.
145
146
147
147a
ADDED VEHICLE
FOOD VEHICLE
FLEET OF 5 OR MORE
PUSHCART
148
FOOD VENDING MACH
15.00
150
FOOD EST PLAN
01
100% LICENSE FEE 1
01
100% LICENSE FEE
Page 3
SCHEDULE1
i
I �
A.
ok e CITY OF EDINA
SCHEDULE OF FEES AND CHARGES BY ORDINANCE'
�o �0 I FOR THE GENERAL FUND AND UTILITY FUND
# OF 1997
# OF
1998
FEE NO.
! FEES PERMITS FEE
PERMITS
FEE
149
MINIMUM FEE 25.00
0
25.00
151
FOOD EST PLAN REMO
101 50% LICENSE FEE
0
50 %LICENSE FEE
HOTEL LICENSE
p
155
50 OR < ROOMS
1
I 0
$2/ ADDED ROOM
155
OVER 50 ROOMS 01 $2/ ADDED ROOM
156
LODGING LICENSE 0
i
SCAVENGER & GARBAGE
COLLECTORS: !
261
270
270
275
SIDEWALK CAFE PERMIT 1
GARBAGE HAULER 17 a
ADDED VEHICLE- j 64
SCAVENGER LIC ! o i l 180.00
64
0
515.00
70.00,
180.00
275
RENEWAL 31 125.00
0
125.00
276
SCAVENGER PERMIT 51 25.00
0
25.00
280
TOBACCO 1 30
i
22
i
BUILDING PERMITS
BUILDING PERMITS
FEE CALCULATION:
30
$0-$500 $21.00
$21.00
31
$501 - $2,000 ! $21.00 +
'
$21.00+
$2.75 /added $100
$2.75 /added $100
> $500
> $500
32
$2,001 - $25,000
$62.25+
$62.25+
$12.50 /added $1000
$12.50 /added $1000
> $2,000
> $2,000
33
$25,001 - $50,000
$349.75+
$349.75+
! $9.00 /added $1000
$9.00 /added $1000
> $25,000
> $25,000
34
$50,001 - $100,000
$574.75+
$6.25 /added $1000
'$6.25 /added $1000
> $50,000
> $50,000
35
$100,001 - $500,000
! $887.25+
$887.25+
$5.00 /added $1000
$5.00 /added $1000
> $100,000
> $100,000
36
$500,001 - $1,000,000
$21887.25+
$2,887.25+
$4.25 /added $1000
$4.25 /added $1000
> $500,000
> $500,000
37
$1,000,000 &OVER I
$5,012.25 +.-
$5,012.25+
$2.75 /added $10001
$2.75 /added $1000
> $1,000,000
> $1,000,000
38
RE- INSPECTION 42.001
42.00
Page 4
SCHEDULE 1
CITY OF EDINA
e o SCHEDULE OF FEES AND CHARGES BY , ORDINANCE
H'�o ay FOR THE GENERAL FUND AND UTILITY FUND
# OF
1997
# OF
1998
FEE NO. ! FEES
PERMITS
! FEE
PERMITS
I FEE
CODE COMPLIANCE INSP.
i
39 RESIDENTIAL
150.001
150.00
40 COMMERCIAL
320.00
320.00
41 _' _LICENSE SURCHARGE
5.001-
5.00
45 MOVING OF BLDGS.
212.00
212.00
46 INDEMNITY FOR DAMAGES
530.00
530.00
50 STREET EXCAVATION
$15/100 FEET
$15/100 FEET
50a MONITORING WELL
$50/WELL
$50/WELL
STREET SURFACE REPAIR
51 UNDER 10 SQ. FEET
$15 /SQ FOOT
$15 /SQ FOOT
52 10 - 25 SQ. FEET
$10 /SQ FOOT
$10 /SQ FOOT
53 OVER 25 SQ. FEET
$7 /SQ FOOT
$7 /SQ FOOT
55 INSTALLER'S LICENSE
55.00
55.00
56, GASFITTING LICENSE
55.00
55.00
76
! WATER COND. INSTALL.
1 25.00
25.00
165 RADIO & TV ANTENNAS
BLDG. PERMIT AMT.
BLDG. PERMIT AMT.
175 ! TREE REMOVE/GRADING
BLDG. PERMIT AMT.
BLDG. PERMIT AMT.
176 1 EXCAVATION /OPEN PIT
BLDG. PERMIT AMT.
BLDG. PERMIT AMT.
80 POOL CONSTRUCTION
j
BLDG. PERMIT AMT.
BLDG. PERMIT AMT.
90 PARKING RAMP LICENSE
100.00
100.00
260 j CURB CUT
35.00
35.00
I PLUMBING:
;MINIMUM FEE:
60 j RESIDENTIAL
22.00
22.00
61 COMMERCIAL 1
27.00
27.00
61a 'TESTING RPZ BACKFLOW PREVENT
25.00
25.00
FEE CALCULATION:
62
$0-$1,000
$16.00+
$16.00+
3.10% > $500
3.10% > $500
63
$1,001 - $5,000
$31.50+-
$31.50+
2.60% > $1,000
2.60% > $1,000
64
$5,001 - $10,000
$135.50+
$135.50+
2.15% > $5,000
2.15% > $5,000
65
$10,001 - $25,000
$243.00 + 1.85%
$243.00 + 1.85%
> $10,000
> $10,000
66
$25,001 - $50,000
$520.50, + 1.65%
$_520.50 + 1.65%
> $25,000
> $25,000
67
$50,001 & OVER
$933.00 + 1.30%
$933.00 + 1.30%
> $50,000
> $50,000
HEATING, VENTILATION &
MECHANICAL:
MINIMUM FEE:
68
RESIDENTIAL
22.00
22.00
69. i
COMMERCIAL
27.00
27.00
FEE.CALCULATION:
70
$0-$1,000
$16.-00-+j
$16.00+
3.10% > $5001
3.10% > $500
71
$1,001 - $5,000
$31.50 +
$31.50+
Page 5
SCHEDULE1
ti
I
CITY OF EDINA
e o SCHEDULE OF FEES AND CHARGES By]` RDINANdt'
FOR THE GENERAL FUND AND .UTILITY FUND
I
# OF
1997
# OF
1998
FEE NO.
I FEES
PERMITS
FEE
PERMITS
FEE
2.60 %> $1,0001
2.60 %> $1,000
72
$5,001 - $10,000
$135.50+1
$135.50+
2.15% > $5,0001
2.15% > $5,000
73
$10,000 - $25,000
$243.00 + 1.85%
$243.00 +.1.85%
> $10,000
> $10,000
74
$25,001 - $50,000
$520.50 + 1.65%
$520.50 + 1.65%
> $25,000
`
> $25,000
75
$50,001 & OVER
$933.00 + 1.30%
$933.00 + 1.30%
> $50,000
> $50,000
ENGINEERING
ROW MANAGEMENT
50
50a
50b
50c
50d
50e
50f
ANNUAL REGISTRATION
MINIMUM PERMIT FEE
ADDED EXCAVATION -PAVED
ADDED EXCAVATION- UNPAVED
UNDERGROUND INSTALL
OPEN TRENCHING
OVERHEAD INSTALL
i
290
IRESTRICTIVE ROAD PERMIT
600
10.00
300
10.00
SEWER RENTAL CHARGE:
-
1.701100 CU FT
25.00 > 41
235
236
237
SGL FAM. < 1600 CU FT
> 1600 CU FT
4 -UNIT APTS.
-
1.751100 CU FT
25.00 > 4
238 '
COMM & IND BLDGS
34MATER
M- �
METER OR 34/WATER
e- ls
METER OR
239
IND. USER SEWER STRENGTH
250
SAC
WATER SERVICE:
950.00
I
1,000
243
243
242
EAST OF BEARD AVE
MORNINGSIDE AREA
ALL OTHER AREAS
EXCESSIVE USE CHARGE
METER CHARGE
oi l
244
245
245
245
245
245
245
245
UP TO 3/4" METER
1" METER
1 1/4" METER -
1 1/2" METER
2" METER
3" METER
4" METER
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
' -
• -
Page 6
J
'j
SCHEDULE1
Page 7
0
O e
H�o � ay
CITY OF EDINA
SCHEDULE OF FEES AND CHARGES BY ORDINANCE_.
FOR THE GENERAL FUND AND UTILITY FUND
# OF 1997
# OF 1998
FEE NO. FEES
PERMITS i -O-E-Et
PERMITS i FEE
FLAT WATER CHARGE:
246
247
240
PARK DEPT /SPRINK/SKATE
ST DEPT /FLUSH
CURB WATER STOPS
2,500.001
1,000.001
I 12.50 /EAI
2,500.00
1,000.00
12.50/EA
241
ISSUE WATER METER
COST +
I COST +
251
255
CONNECTION CHARGE
STORM WATER DRAINAGE
$1,000MINIMUM
5.00 /QTR
j $1,000MINIMUM
5.00 /QTR
„ -
; -
I i
131 SINGLE FAMILY
132 DOUBLE BUNGALOW
133 APTS. CONDOS 2 - 8 UNITS
Page 7
-•r a.
SCHEDULE 2
ORDINANCE NO. 1997 -16
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS:
Section 1. The following described fees of Schedule A to Code Section 185 are
amended to read as follows:
SECTION.-J'
: SUBSEC.
PURPOSE OF
AMOUNT
FEE
FEE/CHARGE
NO.
220
220.04
Machine or
$45.00 annually per
10
amusement
establishment, plus
device license
$7.00 per machine
11
450
450.27 Subd 4
Public or semi-
$370.00 per annum for
81
public swimming
each pool enclosed part
pool license
or all of year
$200.00 per annum for
82
each outdoor pool
450
450.27 Subd 4
Public or semi-
$100.00
83
public whirlpool
bath or
therapeutic
swimming pool
license
605
605.07
Permits required
Minimum fee: $75.00
95
by UFC
r
Special hazard
permit:
Class 1:
$75.00
96
General hazard
and fire safety
inspections
requiring a
special hazard
'
permit
Class 11:
$125.00
97
Special hazard
inspection
involving various
hazardous
materials and /or
processes in
occupancies of
buildings less
than 3000 sf in
area
98
Class 111:
$175.00
Special hazard
inspection
primarily directed
at, but not limited
to, buildings or
occupancies 3000
sf or larger where
any of the
following are
present:
A. Multiple
hazards
B. Storage
handling,
and /or
processes
involving
dangerous or
toxic
materials,
substances
and /or
processes
C. Occupancies in
which evaluation
or high valuation
presents unique
circumstances
615
615.03
License to
$30.00 per annum per
100
service fire
person to be licensed
extinguishers
620
620.04
Permit fee for
$75.00 for each permit
105
cleaning of
commercial
cooking
ventilation
system
625
625.04
Sprinkler permit
110
fees:
Number of
heads:
1 -5
$50.00
6 -25
$75.00
26 -50
$145.00
51 -75
$190.00
76 -100
1$225.00
101 -125
$255.00
126 -150
$270.00
151 -175
$290.00
176 -200
$310.00
201 -Plus
$330.00
$1.00 for each additional
head
625
625.03
Fire pump
$90.00
118
installation and
associated
hardware
Standpipe
$90.00
119
installation
635
635.02
False fire alarm
$300.00
125
716
716.02
Recycling Service:
Single Family
$6.69
131
Dbl Bungalow
$6.69
132
Apt/Condo -
$5.43
133
(2 -8 units)
720
720.04 Sub 3
Food
$545.00 per annum,
135
establishment
$495.00 if certified
license
pursuant to Subsection
720.04, Subd 3C of this
Code, plus $140.00 per
annum for each
additional facility
Day care, limited
$170.00
136
food
establishment
license
Take -out food
$365.00 per annum,
137
facility license
$315.00 if certified
pursuant to Subsection
720.04, Subd 3C of this
Code
Packaged food
$160.00 per annum
138
sales license
Food warehouse
$90.00 per annum
139
license
Catering food
$545.00 per annum,
140
establishment
$495.00 if certified
license
pursuant to Subsection
720.04, Subd 3C of this
Code, plus $140.00 per
annum for each add'I
facility
Retail candy
$70.00 per annum
142
shop license
Potentially
$110.00 per annum-
143
hazardous food
vehicle license
Fleet of 5 or
$550.00 per annum
144
more potentially
hazardous food
vehicles license
Catering food
$200.00 per annum, plus
145
vehicle license
$45.00 per annum for
each add'I vehicle
Food vehicle
$110.00
146
license
Fleet of 5 or
$550.00 per annum
147
more food
vehicles license
Pushcart
$160.00
147a
License
735
735.03
Hotel, lodging or
Hotels - $270.00 for 1 -50
155
boarding house
rooms - $2.00 /each room
license
Lodging and boarding
156
houses /$70.00 per
location
820
820.01
Filing of
$200.00
170
application for
vacation of
street, alley or
-
easement
900
900.06 Subd 1
Club on -sale
$675.00
206
liquor license
900
900.6 Subd 1
Non - intoxicating
malt liquor
license:
On -sale
$245.00 renewal
207
$310.00 new
208
900
900.04 Subd 2
Off -sale
$245.00 renewal
209
$310.00 new
210
900
900.16 Subd 3
Temporary on-
$55.00
211
sale non -
intoxicating malt
liquor license
900
900.16 Subd 1
On -sale wine
Per year- Restaurants with 50
license
or fewer seats $805.00
212
51 -100 seats inclusive $875.00
213
101- 150seats inclusive $950.00
214
Over 150 seats $1015.00
In - a. -
215
900
900.17 Subd 6A
Manager's
$75.00 per yr
216
license
1040
1040.08
Loudspeaker
$11.00 per permit
225
permit
1100
1100.03 Subd 2
Sewer service
charge.
To and including
$28.00 quarter
235
1600 cubic feet
From 1601 cubic
$1.75 per 100 cubic feet
236
feet and over
Apartment
$25.00 for each unit over
237
buildings with
four, or $1.75 per 100
more than 4
cubic ft of water used
dwelling units
during quarter,
whichever is greater
1100
1100.03 Subd 2
Sewer service
$34.00 per water meter or
238
charge:
approved sewage
Com'I & Ind
metering device on
buildings,
premises, or $1.75 per
including
100 cubic ft of water
schools &
used during quarter
churches
whichever is greater
1100
1100.03 Subd 2
Water Service
1. $0.62/100 cubic ft for
242
area of City, except
areas described
below in 2
2. $1.52/100 cubic ft for
243
Morningside area and
for east side of beard
Av from West 54th St
to Fuller St and both
sides of Abbott PI
from West 54th St to
Beard Av
3. Excessive use charge
244
$.20/100 cubic ft
Meter Charge:
up to % inch meter $7.48 /qtr
245
1" meter $10.15 /qtr
1 V meter $11.60 /qtr
1 % " meter $13.05 /qtr
2 " meter $21.00 /qtr
3" meter $79.71 /qtr
4" meter $101.45/qtr
1105
1105.01 Subd 1
Service
$1,000,00 per SAC unit X
250
Availability
number of SAC units
Charge (SAC)
computed as pursuant to
Subsection 1105.01,
. J. - T
Subd 1 of this Code
1230
1230.07
Sidewalk cafe
$515.00
261
permit
1300
1300.02 Subd 1
Refuse or
$240.00 per annum for
270
recycling hauler
first vehicle, $70.00 for
license
each additional vehicle
1325
1325.03
Tobacco sale
$265.00
280
license
oe
H�v �
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
T0: Mayor Smith and Members
of the City Council
From: John Keprios, Director
Park and Recreation Department
Date: December 12, 1997
Subject:
1998 Golf Course Greens Fees
Agenda Item # XII. B.
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
X To Council
Action ❑ Motion
X Resolution
❑ Ordinance
❑ Discussion
Recommendation:
The Edina Park Board and staff recommend that the 1998 greens fees for Braemar Golf Course and
Fred Richards Golf Course be approved as follows:
Braemar Golf Course
1997
1998
18 hole - non - patron
$23.00
$24.00
18 hole - patron
$18.00
$19.00
9 hole - non - patron
$13.00
$13.50
9 hole - patron
$10.00
$11.00
Group Fees - 18 holes
$32.00
$33.00
Group Fees - 9 holes
$16.00
$17.00
Braemar Executive Course
1997
1998
Adult non - patron
$8.50
$9.00
Adult patron
$7.00
$7.50
Junior non - patron
$6.50
$7.00
Junior patron
$5.00
$5.50
Group Fees
$11.00
$12.00
Richards Golf Course
1997
1998
Adult non - patron
$9.50
$10.00
Adult patron
$8.00
$8.50
Junior non - patron
$6.50
$7.00
Junior patron
$5.00
$5.50
-2-
Background:
At the December 1, 1997, City Council meeting, staff was directed to provide more background
information on the Park Board's proposed fees and charges for the golf courses' green fees.
As noted in Mr. Valliere's memo, which is attached to this report, Braemar Golf Course green fees are
slightly above the average municipal course. As Mr. Valliere points out, one of the primary factors that
has influenced the greens fees at Braemar for years has been the philosophy that municipal golf in Edina
should be competitively priced at a level that is affordable for residents and the community at large. The
argument could be made that the demand for golf is currently such that a further increase in green fees
would not necessarily significantly lessen the amount of play on the facility, however, raising fees to
simply create a larger revenue stream has not been the philosophy of previous City Councils.
It is therefore staffs recommendation that the City Council approve the Park Board's recommendation
to increase the green fees as shown above.
memorandum
Date: December 11, 1997
To: Edina City Council
C.C. Ken Rosland, City Manager
John Keprios, Park & Recreation Director
From: John Valliere, Manager Braemar Golf Course
Subject: Braemar Green Fees
BACKGROUND:
The Braemar Golf Course green fees are presently slightly above the average municipal
course cost. Generally speaking the older the course the lower the green fees because bond and
interest payments for land acquisition and construction costs have been liquidated. Please see the
enclosed chart for other golf course fees.
Privately owned public golf courses usually charge more for green fees. These entities are
profit motivated and must also pay real estate taxes.
Recently there has been a proliferation of upscale privately owned public facilities in the
Metropolitan area. Examples are the Wildes and Rush Creek. These courses are new and expensive
endeavors which ask fees in the $60.00 - $90.00 price ranges. These higher fees tend to cause upward
pressure on all other facilities. The factors which govern or dictate the cost of golf at municipal
operations are tied to the purpose and philosophy of municipal recreation.
1. Provide affordable golf for residents and the community at large.
2. To meet costs and maintain facilities.
3. Profit motivation or revenue stream. (This has not been Edina's philosophy)
4. Market factors - price of a comparable course.
The cost of golf at Braemar has been for a steady increase of about 4 0/6-5% annually. This is
slightly ahead of the inflation curve of about 2.5 0/6-3 9/` Green fees were increased in 1997 by $2.00
(10 9/6) for non patrons and $1.00 for patrons. However, the patron card increased by $5.00 in 1997
also. The perception that non patrons are non residents is incorrect. Many non patrons, are in fact,
spouses of patron card holders or resident guests of a patron card holder.
-2-
1997 PATRON VS. NON PATRON TRAFFIC
18 Hole Patron rounds 25,500 rounds
18 Hole non Patron rounds . 20,400 rounds
9 Hole Patron rounds 10,625 rounds
9 Hole non Patron rounds '19,625 rounds
Non Resident traffic is about 20% of our total- traffic and occurs mostly on our new nine.
A "Braemar comparative fee increase schedule is enclosed.
As new'courses come on line (Woodbury, Chaska & -Glen Lake) we must retain
our customer base and competitive -edge.
STAFF RECOMN ENDS a one dollar ($1.00) increase in 18. hole fees or 4.4%.
1997 MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE FEES
Service
Brookview
Baker
o4 Brasrns
� Bunker
Dwen
Edinborough
Groenhaven
. Inverwood
Keller
Rich Acres
Valleywood
MDIs.
18 N/P
$22.00
$28.50
$23.00
$27.00
$18.00
$35.00
$22.00/525.00
$24.00
$23.00
$20.00422.00
$22.00/$27.00
$20.00
18 PATRON
$18.001$19.00
$24.00
$18.00
$23.00
$1340
$24.00
$21.001524.00
$19.00
WA
$17.001$19.00
$24.00429.00
$16.00
9 N/P
$13.00
$18100
$13.00
$14.00
$12.00
. WA
$13.00
$14.00
$15 AFTER 5
$13.001$14.00
$14.00/517.00
$14.50
9 PATRON
$12.00/$12.50
$14.50
310.00
$12.00
$9.00
WA
$12.00
$11.00
N/A
$12.501$13.00
$12.0015.00
$13.50
18 SENIOR
$15.00
$23.50
WA
$12.00
WA
$26.00
(M -W F)$12.00
WA
$13.50
415.00WK.
M-TH $19.00
$11.50
18 CART
$22.00
$24.00.
$22.00
$24.00
$20.00
$24.00
$22.00
$22.00
' $22.50
$21.00
$24.00
$22.00
9 CART
$12.00
$14.50
$13.00
$12.00
$10.00
WA
$11.00
$13.00
$12.00
$13.00
$13.00
$12.00
EXEC/PAR3
s7.25
$8.50
$8.50
$8.00
WA
N/Al
fVA
.$10.00
WA
$7.50
WA
$8.00
CARD "
s55.00/$90.db
$25.00
$60.00
$50.00
$40.001$85.00
$65.00
. $30.00/$60.00
$45.00/$80.00
$20.00 SENIOR
$20.001$45.00
$80.00/$30.00
$30.00/$40.00
rEATT.
SUC
$5.25
$5.50
$5.25
BY QUARTER
WA
$5.00
WA
$5.25
$4.00
'$5.00
$5.00
$6.00
BUCKET_
$4,25
$4.00
$3.25
BY QUARTER
WA
$2.50
$1.50
$1.75
$2.50
$3.00
$3.00
$4.50
PULL CART
$2.00
$3-001
$2.25
$2.50
$2.00
$3.00
$2.50
$2.25
$3.50
$1.75
$2.50
$2.50
RAIN CHECK',
3-12
4-13
3-12
3-12
ONLY 9
PRO RATED
3-12
3-12
6 OR LESS
3-12
3-12
3-12
1/2 Cart
No
No
No
No
No
No
$17.00
No
No
$13.00
No
No
OTHER
TEE TIME
RES. ONLY
BREAK ON
PAT CARD.
SPIKELESS
2 FOR 1 RANGE
APPLE VALLEY
CARD $80.00
FOR PAT.
GREEN FEES
BLOOM. RESI
$1.00 OFF
BALLS 84 9
ONLY FOR
NO DISC. ,
ONLY 91
GREEN FEES1
I
I
WEEKDAYS1
PATRON CARD
MOST COURSES WILL INCURR A $1,00 INCREASE IN GREEN
FEES FOR THE 1998 SEASON
COMPARATIVE 1996.1997 AND PROPOSED 1998
° BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE FEES.
PATRON'" `CARDS 1996
Individual ..................... 55 °-.00
*before
Executive Course ............... 25.00
COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS
Resident- ..................... 16.00
Non Resident ................... 21.00
LOCKERS
1997
1999
60,:00 *;
60.00*
April Ist$55.00
25.00
25.00
25.00
16.00 18.00
21.00 22.00
Men's 7211 ......................
35.00
35.00
35.00
Men's 42" ......................
25.00
25.00
25.00
Women's 7211 ...................
15.00
15.00
15.00
CLUBSTORAGE .............................
35.00
35.00
35.00
CLUB RENTAL... ..........................
7.00
7.00
7.00
PULL CARTS ...............................
2.25
2.25
2.25
GOLF CARS
18. Holes ........................... 20.00 22.00 22.00
9 Holes ........................... 12.00 13.00 13.00
18 Holes Sgl.Hdcp.person........... 10.00 11.00 11.00
GROUP GOLF LESSONS
Adult .............................. 58.00 60.00 62.00
Junior ............................. 28.00 30.00 32.00
GOLF RANGE
Large Bucket ....................... 5.00 5.25 5.50
Small Bucket ....................... 3.00 3.25 3.50
Warm Up Bucket ..................... 1.50 1.50 1.75
EEN_ FEES`"
28t`Hole Non .Pitrori ...............
1B �Iole� atron.-1 .................,'..08$.0.¢i
-W Hole, Hole w' ' Patron:.............. U_=. 5$ "1 .00� UNN
9Hole ..._patron ............... :9S :Oa 10.00
GROUP FEES - :18'_Holei .................... 29.00 32.00 -M. A
GROUP FEES - 9 Hole ..................... 15.00 16.00 17.00
GROUP CAR FEES ........................... 30.00 30.00 30.00
RICHARDS
EXECUTIVE COURSE 96 97 98 96 97 98
Adult - Non Patron............ 8.00 8.50. 9.00 9.00 9.50 10.00
Adult - Patron ................ 7.00 7.00 7.50 8.00 8.00 8.50
Junior - Non Patron........... 6.00. 6.50 7.00 6.00 6.50 7.00
Junior - Patron .............. 5.00 5.00 5.50 5.00 5.06 5.50
Golf Cars - Everyone.......... 10.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 10-.00 10.00
Pull Carts ................ 1.75 2.00 2.00 1.75 2.00 2.00
Group Fees... ................. 11.00 11.00 12.00 11.00 11.00 12.00
GOLF DOME
Regular Bucket .....................
5.50
5.50
6.00
Senior Bucket ......................
5.25
5.25
5.75
Time Golf - 1/2 hr .................
8.00
8.00
8.50
Hourly Field Rental ................
100.00
100.00
110.00
Leagues ............................
695.00
700.00
725.00
3RAEMAR ROOM
Wedding Related - .................
625.00
625.00
625.00
Wedding, Related - Non Resident.....
675.00
675.00
700.00
Other Events .......................
250.00to
250.00to
250.00to
650.00
675.00
700.00
o e
Cn
�y
less
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
From: JOHN WALLIN
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
Date: DECEMBER 15, 1997
Subject:
LEVY AND BUDGET ADOPTION
HEARING
Recommendation:
Agenda Item # xn r
Consent ❑
Information Only 0
Mgr. Recommends ❑
To HRA
®
To Council
Action [:]
Motion
®
Resolution
F
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Adopt Resolution approving the budget for 1998 expenditures at
$17,913,763.00 and the General Fund Property Tax Levy at
$13,099,140.00.
0
�1�A mil\
o e
Cn
\MCORPOPA -ISO/
1888
RESOLUTION OF COMMENDATION
EDINA HIGH SCHOOL
1997 GIRLS' VARSITY TENNIS TEAM
WHEREAS, the 1997 Girls' Varsity Tennis Team were State Champions; and
KATHERINE AGUSTSSON and LAURA ROVICK were 1997 State Tennis
Doubles Champions; and
WHEREAS, success has come to the members of the team because of their
extraordinary ability, hours of practice, and the leadership of their coaches; and
WHEREAS, as representatives of the City of Edina, the members of the Team
exemplified the highest standards of athletic proficiency and good sportsmanship.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that sincere
congratulations be extended to the members of the Team:
KATHERINE AGUSTSSON
ELLEN ANDERSON
NICOLE ARMBRUST
TERESA BORDONARO
JAMIE CARTER •
.---- JEANNETTE CLUSKEY
MARA GUSTAFSON
MARION KIM
ALEXANDRA KOCH
ANNA KOOSMANN
REBECCA KRASNO
KRISTEN LILYQUIST
JENNY LUND
SHANNON LYNCH
_ JTFTDI pOVICK _.
~ LAURA ROVICK
ANNIE THOMPSON
RACHAEL ZORN
Coaches:
STEVE PAULSEN
GREG GROSZ
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution be recorded in the Minutes of the
Edina City Council and that copies be given to members of the Team.
ADOPTED this 29th day of December, 1997.
Mayor
AGENDA
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
DECEMBER 1, 1997
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL
ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the
Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items
marked with an asterisk ( *) in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered routine and
will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a
Commissioner, Council Member or citizen so requests it. In such cases the item will be removed from
the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the Agenda.
I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of HRA - Meeting of November 17,1997
II. SET HEARING DATE (1/5/98) - Budget Amendment to 50th & France Tax Increment
Financing District
Rollcall III PAYMENT OF CLAIMS as per pre -list dated 11/25/97 TOTAL: $9,650.48
IV. ADJOURNMENT
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of November 17,1997
II. ORDINANCES First Reading: Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second Rea&&: Favorable
rollcall vote of all Council members to pass.
Rollcall A. Second Reading Ordinance No. 1997 -14 Amending Edina Code Section 1230 and 900 and
modifying City Policy regarding the consumption of 3.2 % malt liquor at certain City Parks
and Facilities
Rollcall B. Second Reading Ordinance No. 1997 -17 repealing Edina Code Section 1325 and replacing
it with new Section 1326 regulating the sale and use of tobacco products.
III. AWARD OF BID
A. 1998 Bloomington Public Health Nursing Contract
Agenda/Edina City Council
December 1, 1997
Page 2
IV. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS
A. Reinstatement of Chico's Taco's Wine and 3.2 Beer License
* B. D'Amico & Sons New Wine and 3.2 Beer License
V. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS
VI. CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
A. Lynn Hulstrand, 4614 Edgebrook Place
VII. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES
VIII. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL
IX. MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEM
X. FINANCE
A. First Reading Ordinance No. 1997-16 Amending Code Section 185 to Increase Certain Fees.
Rollcall B. Resolution - Ambulance Fees
Rollcall C. Resolution - Miscellaneous Fees
Rollcall D. Resolution - Park and Recreation Fees
Rollcall E. Payment Of Claims As Per Pre -List Dated 11/25/97 TOTAL: $1,370,055.02
- SCHEDULE OF-UPCOMING MEETINGS_.:
Wed
Dec 3
Truth In Taxation Hearing 5:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Wed
Dec 10
Truth In Taxation Continuation Date 5:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Mon
Dec 15
Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Wed
Dec 24
CHRISTMAS EVE DAY - City Hall closes at noon
Thur
Dec 25
CHRISTMAS DAY - City Hall Closed
Mon
Dec. 29
Year End Meeting 5:00 P.M.
MANAGER'S CONF. RM
Wed
Dec 31
NEW YEAR'S EVE DAY - City Hall Closes at noon
Thur
Jan 1
NEW YEAR'S DAY - City Hall Closed
Mon
Jan 5
Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Mon
Jan 19
MARTIN LUTHER KING DAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed
Tues
Jan 20
Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
HELD AT CITY HALL
NOVEMBER 17, 1997 - 7:00 P.M.
BOLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioner Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold and Chair
Smith.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Maetzold
and seconded by Commissioner Kelly approving and adopting the HRA Consent
Agenda as presented with the exception of Item HRA II, Change Order No. 1,
Lewis Engineer Demolition Project.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold, Smith
Motion carried.
*HRA MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 3.1997._ Motion made by Commissioner Maetzold
and seconded by Commissioner Kelly approving the HRA Minutes of November
3, 1997.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
CHANGE ORDER NO 1 FOR LEWIS ENGINEERING DEMOLITION PROJECT
AWARDED Commissioner Hovland informed Council he removed Change Order No. 1
for the Lewis Engineering Demolition Project from the Consent Agenda for further
information about the project.
Engineer Hoffman explained the Change Order for project HRA97 -5 is for extra work
required on the building demolition at the Lewis Engineering site. An additional
underground storage tank of 4000 gallons was discovered while demolishing the
structure. The contractor brought in a subcontractor to pump out and remove the
contents plus remove and dispose of the tank appropriately. Extra costs for this
additional work amounted to $7,453.40 and exceeds the 10% contract limit. The HRA
must approve the Change Order prior to- payment. Staff recommends approval of the
Change Order. The new total contract price with the Change Order is $54,366.40.
Commissioner Hovland made a motion for award of Change Order No.1 for the
Lewis Engineering Demolition Project at 5229 Eden Avenue to Veit Construction,
Inc., at $7,453.40. Commissioner Kelly seconded the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold, Smith
Motion carried.
CLAIMS PAID Commissioner Maetzold made a motion to approve payment of the
following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated November 12,
1
1997, and consisting of one page totaling, $390,000.24; and for confirmation of
payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated
October 21, 1997, and consisting of one page totaling $205,375.66. Commissioner
Hovland seconded the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold, Smith
Motion carried.
There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, Chair Smith declared the meeting
adjourned.
Executive Director
o e REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
Agenda Item #
I.
From: Francis Hoffman �,�
Consent
❑
Director of Public Works
Information Only
❑
Date: December 15, 1997
Mgr. Recommends
❑ To HRA
® To Council
Subject: 1997 Storm Reports
Action
0 Motion
By Consultants
� Resolution
Ordinance
® Discussion
Recommendation:
Review information and direct staff to develop more detailed project implementation
reports for each sub -area if Council so desires.
Info /Background:
These reports are generated as a result of the storm activities that occurred during July
of 1997. The primary information has been developed by William Endersen, the
meteorologist providing storm data; Robert Obermeyer, the primary engineer from Barr
Engineering on stormwater /groundwater data; and David Kirkwold, the primary engineer
from Toltz, King, Duvall, Anderson, and Associates (TKDA) on sanitary sewer data.
The only other data provided by staff for this report is a copy of the Edina monthly flow
comparison provided by the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) and
a daily sum of flow at the Metro Treatment Plant and the Minneapolis meters for June
through September, 1997, also from MCES.
The consultants spent considerable time attempting to analyze the conditions and to
develop solutions.
EVALUATION OF THE CITY'S
SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM
�r7A,
0-i
N
S
i
1"CORPOB-p��vv
1888
December 8, 1997
Comm. No. 11413
TKDA TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON
AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
ENGINEERS - ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS 1500 PIPER JAFFRAY PLAZA
444 CEDAR STREET
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 -2140
PHONE:612/292 -4400 FAX:6121292 -0083
}
I. Executive Summary
This study has been conducted to determine the reasons for sanitary sewer
backups and surcharging that occurred in the City'of Edina as a result of a heavy
rainstorm on July 22, 1997. Rainfall amounts during most of July were
significantly above normal and contributed to the problem in that the ground was
saturated with water before the July 22 storm.
The configuration of the City's sanitary sewer system can be divided into three
primary service areas. These have been identified as Area A, B, and C. Area A
provides service to the northeast area of the City. Area B provides service
across the middle of the City in a northwest to southeast general arrangement.
Area C services the southwest area of the City.
Most of the complaints of sewer backups can be included in three specific
neighborhoods in the City. These specific areas were studied in more detail and
are identified as follows:
• Tower/Woodcrest, Area A, Basin 6
• St. Johns /Ashcroft, Area B, Basin 10
• Limerick, Area C, Basin 18
The following background information was determined to be necessary to
evaluate the sanitary sewer system and the problems associated with the July 22
rain:
• Peak Wastewater Flows. Peak wastewater flowrates were estimated for
each of three primary service areas.
• Estimate of Wastewater Sources. An estimate was developed of the
breakdown of the peak flow for each primary area between base flow,
infiltration and inflow.
These analyses resulted in the following estimate of the component flow sources
and the resultant total flow for July 22.
Flow Component Area A
Base Flow 625 gpm
Infiltration 1,070 gpm
Inflow 3,395 gpm
Maximum Flow 5,090 gpm
Area B
Area C
Total
840 gpm
1,140 gpm
2,605 gpm
1,220 gpm
1,060 gpm
3,350 gpm
3,140 gpm
2100 gpm
8,635 gpm
5,200 gpm
4,300 gpm
14,590 gpm
The peak flow generated from the City during this rainstorm was 14,590 gpm
(21.0 MGD) which compares to the average flow for the year of 7.5 MGD.
1 11413
Specific field surveys were conducted to gather information on the possible
sources of clear water that finds its way into the sanitary sewers during heavy
rains. The surveys included a house sump pump survey of 500 homes, a
manhole survey of 456 manholes; and a TV survey of 33,207 feet of sanitary
sewer. The results of these surveys would indicate the following:
Approximately seven percent of the homes surveyed had sump pumps
connected to the sanitary sewer. The number City wide is expected to be
four percent.
• Approximately 85 percent of the manholes in the City have pickholes. This
was common construction practice during the time when Edina's sewers were
installed. The potential inflow from manhole covers that are not sealed can
be significant for very intense rainfall.
• The TV survey of the sewers included in the survey indicated the sewers
were generally in good condition. The survey did indicate likely joint leakage
during wet periods by the presence of deposits at the sewer joints. The
observation of debris and partial obstructions is a reason to recommend a
trunk line televising and cleaning program.
Excessive inflow of clear water into the sanitary sewer system is the most
significant reason for the problems experienced during the July 22 storm. The
analysis of other periods of rain would indicate very intense rain, in the category
of a 100 year storm, is necessary before inflow becomes a significant portion of
the sanitary wastewater flow. The projected inflow quantity for the entire City is
estimated to be 8,635 gpm which is 59 percent of the peak flow of 14,590 gpm.
In addition to excessive inflow, the other reasons for problems in the specific
problem areas are listed as follows:
Tower/Woodcrest
• A partial blockage in the downstream sewer.,
• A limitation in sewer conveyance capacity.
• Basement elevations are close to top of sewer.
St. Johns /Ashcroft
• Basement elevations are close to top of sewer.
• A limitation in sewer conveyance capacity.
Limerick
None.
2 11413
Estimated Costs
The estimated costs of the recommendations presented in this report are
considered preliminary and need to be verified by feasibility reports.
Recommendations
The following are recommendations that have been developed in this report:
1. Develop an aggressive inflow reduction program. This program should
include the following:
• Public Education Program.
• Establish an Inflow Reduction Goal - Suggest 40 percent reduction
in three years.
• Implement a program to eliminate basement sump pumps
connected to the sanitary sewer system. City wide survey cost
$400,000.
• Develop a plan to replace manhole covers and seal manhole tops.
Estimated Cost - $500,000.
• Selectively replace older brick manholes susceptible to flooding.
Estimated Cost - $100,000.
2. Add a plugging, televising, and cleaning program for large trunk sewers to
the existing cleaning program.
3. Construct a relief sewer for the Tower/Woodcrest Area from St. Johns
Avenue and Tower Street to the Minnehaha trunk. Estimated Cost -
$400,000.
4. Construct a storage tank to shave peak flow rates for the Minnehaha
trunk sewer near West 58th Street and Halifax. Estimated Cost -
$500,000.
5. Construct a relief sewer for the St. Johns /Ashcroft Area from the
Crosstown frontage road and Ashcroft Lane to St. Johns Avenue and
Garrison Lane. Estimated Cost - $250,000.
6. Evaluate alternatives for increasing the conveyance capacity from the City
by directing flow from Area A and /or Area B to the MCES Interceptor
1 RF -490 in Richfield. Range of Estimated Cost - $150,000 to $900,000.
3 11413
300
250
200
150
�*M
M
Edina
Monthly Flow Comparison
------------------------------ ---- -----------------------
-------- --- -- --- -----------
------ -------------------------------- ------------------
--------------------------------- I -------------------------
----------- ----------------------- - ---------------------
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
19941183.6
166.71181.9
192.6
207.4-195.7]200.61190.5!192.4
205.61
185
187, - 6-
19951
194
170.3
194.8
195.4
201.5
213.8 i 207
1
207.8118S,4
1
197.6
187:31185AI
1996
187.1
168.1
182.8
180.5
196,2
205 1197.2
1
187 '1733
173,8
178.8
178.31
1997
177.5
156.
196
1196.5
190.3
181,41266.6
225.31 201
1
Metered Flows Only
-w- 1994
1995
4-1996
x-1997
r i i • i •
x-00000
V
0
L
U -A 300000
E
G
A
I
200000
L l
0
.s
X 100000.
O
CJ 0
t�
d-,
1 Y) PLS Ir' ISTeas
Suivi
T
JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER
199
WILLIAM ENDERSEN
METEOROLOGIST 4009 CHOWEN AVENUE SOUTH
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55410
(612) 920 -8 177
HEAVY RAIN EVENTS IN EDINA, MINNESOTA IN 1997
December 10, 1997
Introduction
The City of Edina was struck with an unusual amount of rain during the summer of
1997. The first major storm arrived on June 28, and frequent major storms continued
through July 25 before there was a significant break in the pattern. The biggest storm
after that date was an all -day rain on August 19.
The purposes of this study are the following:
• determine how much rain fell in Edina during the wettest period
• analyze variations in the rainfall across the city
• compare the rainfall to the long -term record
• determine the rainfall and duration of individual storms that caused heavy rain
• identify storms that were statistically rare
Rainfall data were available from only two rain gages within the City of Edina. They are
located very close to each other at Braemar Park in the southwest corner of Edina.
Neither gage is a recording gage, and they both rely on human observers to take a
reading each morning. Both gages are situated where a fence can interfere with proper
rainfall measurement. There were substantial differences between the readings from
these two gages for some events, and one of the gages had data missing because it
was not read on weekends.
These rainfall readings were supplemented by rain data from a variety of different
sources surrounding Edina, including my own rain gage readings taken just three
blocks from the northeast corner of Edina, to estimate the rainfall from various storms.
Rain data were collected from the Minnesota State Climatological Network, the National
Weather Service and their Cooperative Observers, the Metropolitan Mosquito Control
Commission, Barr Engineering, the City of Richfield and other personal rain reports.
My personal weather observations and files of storm notes were used to supplement
the rainfall measurements and help characterize each storm.
The data from some sites was not available for some events for several reasons
including instrument malfunction, missing data or readings not taken by the observer.
The precise quantification of rainfall amounts in Edina was limited by three factors:
1. The lack of reliable rain - measuring sites, especially in the central portion of Edina.
f
2. Differences between measurements taken at the two rain gages at Braemar Park.
3. The considerable variation in rainfall amounts at locations surrounding Edina for
specific events and for the longer 28 -day study period.
Total Rainfall
The total rainfall measured at various sites during the study period of June 28 through
July 25 are plotted on the map in Figure 1. There is uncertainty concerning the
accuracy of some of the readings, and the data are too sparse for an accurate
determination of the rainfall in specific neighborhoods. However, I have made some
judgments and smoothed the data to produce Figure 2 which delineates the
approximate variations in rainfall across Edina during that period. The rainfall in nearly
all of Edina was in the range of 14 inches to more than 17 inches, and it appears that
the greatest amount of total rainfall occurred in the northeastern portion of the city. The
average rainfall during this 28 -day period was close to 16 inches.
The unusual nature of this amount of rain can be seen by comparing the above
numbers with the long -term record for the Twin Cities. The average rainfall during that
28 -day period, based on data compiled by the National Weather Service for the years
1891 -1996, was 3.2 inches. Therefore, the rainfall during the period June 28 through
July 25 this year was approximately five times the historical average. The rainfall in
Edina during the same period in 1996 was only about one inch. These climatological
comparisons are displayed in the bar graph in Figure 3.
How Much Rain is a Lot of Rain?
Another way to assess the wet period of 1997 is to compare it to previous monthly rain
totals. The following list of the greatest monthly rainfalls is a ranking of all the monthly
rainfalls (for any month of the year) of eight inches or more measured at the Twin
Cities' official weather observation station since modern records began in 1891.
rank
month
rainfall
1
July 1987
17.90
2
July 1997
12.60
3
July 1892
11.87,
4
May 1906
10.33
5
June 1990
9.82
6
August 1977
9.31
7
August 1914
8.70
8
June 1914
8.63
9
June 1920
8.43
10
July 1900
8.15
11
May 1908
8.14
12
May 1962
8.03
2
f
As can be seen from this list, there were only 12 months with at least eight inches of
rain during this 107 -year span. So eight inches of rain certainly would be considered a
very wet month. By comparison, the 28 -day wet period of 1997 brought an average of
twice that amount of rain to Edina.
Of the four months that exceeded ten inches of rain, July 1997 (as measured at the
international airport) took second place with 12.6 inches, while July 1987 was by far the
wettest month of record with 17.9 inches. The rainfall in much of Edina over the 28 -day
wet period of 1997 was just slightly less than the rain in the wettest calendar month of
the entire 107 -year record.
Storms
Numerous rainstorms and their cumulative effect likely contributed to the water
problems in Edina this past summer. I have made an estimate of the average daily
rainfall in Edina for the period June 28 through August 19. Those rain events are
plotted in Figure 4. The storms are plotted on their primary day of occurrence when
they extended a little into another day, and very small amounts of rain much less than
0.1 inches have not been plotted. These averages, of course, represent less than the
maximum rainfall in Edina during each storm.
The following are brief descriptions of the major rain events of the summer of 1997 in
Edina.
June 28 -29
Thunderstorms with brief heavy rain struck at about 3:45 p.m. on Saturday, June 28
and were followed by another round of thunderstorms in the evening. Less - intense rain
fell after midnight and ended during the morning of June 29. All the rain in Edina fell
during a period of about 22 hours and ranged over about 1.6 to 2.1 inches. The
average rainfall was approximately 1.8 inches. Estimated rainfall amounts for these
two days are plotted separately on the bar graph in Figure 4.
July 1
A remarkable thunderstorm dropped torrential rain during the period of about 7:45 p.m.
to 8:30 p.m. and then ended over the next 15 minutes. A little more light rain fell later
in the evening. Measured rainfall amounts are shown in Figure 5. Rainfall in Edina
ranged from about 2.0 inches in parts of the southwest to around 3.6 inches in the
northeast. The average rainfall was about 2.8 inches, nearly all of which fell in less
than an hour.
July 13
Two brief thunderstorms with heavy rain occurred at the opposite ends of this date.
The first storm dropped only about 0.2 inches of rain at 1:30 a.m. The second storm
struck at around 8:15 p.m. with extremely heavy rain. The average rainfall in the
evening storm was about 1.3 inches, nearly all of which fell in about 30 minutes.
k]
July 17
A thunderstorm with very heavy rain hit Edina beginning around 2 a.m. Extremely
heavy rain fell for less than an hour and then tapered off and ended by 6 a.m. Rainfall
likely exceeded one inch in just ten minutes at the beginning of the storm in northern
Edina. Measured rainfall amounts are shown in Figure 6. Total rainfall varied greatly
from about 0.8 inches in southwestern Edina to approximately 3.5 inches in much of
northeastern Edina.
July 19
This event was a very heavy downpour mainly in southwestern Edina. A thunderstorm
with very heavy rain passed through the southwestern suburbs of the Twin Cities and
just grazed Edina beginning around 8:20 a.m. that Saturday morning and ending within
about three hours. Rainfall amounts ranged from only about a quarter of an inch in
northeastern Edina to possibly 2.5 inches in the Braemar Park area.
July 22
Very heavy rain fell overnight July 21 -22 beginning at around 11 p.m. to midnight on
July 21 and continuing to nearly 9 a.m. on July 22. Rain intensity decreased
dramatically after that time, and light rain fell for much of the rest of the day. Measured
rainfall amounts are shown in Figure 7. Other unverified rainfall amounts reported to
the city or in the media were in the 4.5 to 6.0 inch range. The average rainfall for Edina
was probably at least four inches.
The storm of July 22 caused considerable problems with flooding partly because it
brought so much rain that morning, but also because it was the last of an impressive
series of storms to strike the Edina area. The soil had absorbed a lot of water from the
storms of June 28, June 29 and July 1 and then had been soaked repeatedly by major
rains on July 13, July 17 and July 19. Lighter rain fell on July 20 and 21. The final
storm of the series, on July 22, dropped a great deal of rain on soils that were already
quite wet and caused them to become saturated.
August 19
Rain fell nearly all day during the times around 4 a.m. to 7 a.m. and 9 a.m. to 11 P.M.
Rainfall was very heavy for extended periods in the morning and diminished in intensity
gradually during the afternoon and evening. The average rainfall for Edina was
approximately 3.0 inches with little variation across the city.
Storm Frequencies
Storm frequency, sometimes referred to as "storm return period ", is a measure of how
often a certain amount of rain can be expected to fall within a given length of time at a
specific location. For example, a 100 -year 24 -hour storm represents the amount of rain
that would have a one - percent chance of falling in 24 hours during any given year at a
specific location.
El I
There are several scientific references containing storm frequencies for this area, and
each one uses different data and statistical techniques to compute these frequencies.
The table below represents a composite summary of approximate values for 100 -year
storms in Edina.
100 -Year Storms - Edina (inches of rain)
10 minutes 1.4
1 hour
3.0
6 hours
4.2
12 hours
5.2
24 hours
6.2
10 days
9.2
The storm that stands out as being particularly uncommon in 1997 was the torrential
downpour of July 1. Rainfall in the northeastern part of Edina, where more than 3.0
inches of rain fell in less than an hour, exceeded the 100 -year storm for this area.
The storm of July 22 might have been a 100 -year 12 -hour storm in some areas mainly
from southwestern to north - central or northeastern Edina as a few unverified reports
indicated rainfall in excess of five inches during this time.
The other storm that might have flirted with being a 100 -year event in some parts of
Edina was the thunderstorm that struck around 2 a.m. on July 17. That storm began
with some extremely heavy rain that probably came close to the 1.4 inches in ten
minutes that would be a 100 -year event in Edina.
There are several possible explanations of why two or three 100 -year storms might
have occurred in Edina during the same year:
1. The term 100 -year storm" refers to the likelihood of an event during any given year,
not the number of years between events.
2. The term "100 -year storm" applies to the likelihood of a storm at a specific location.
Subsequent 100 -year storms might occur at different locations.
3. The storms can be of different types. For example, the storms in Edina in 1997
might have been 100 -year storms over periods of from ten minutes to twelve hours.
4. The meteorological data record that these storm frequencies are based on is often
much less than 100 years long. Such a short data record might prevent us from
knowing how often these extreme storms actually occur.
5
Previous Years with Repeated Heavy Rains
A recent study by the Minnesota State Climatology Office found that no year during the
period 1891 -1996 ever had more than two calendar days with more than 2.5 inches of
rain in the Twin Cities' official rain gage. During the summer of 1997, however, parts of
northeastern Edina experienced four days (July 1, July 17, July 22 and August 19) with
over 3.0 inches of rain.
Storms of July 1987
The last time that the Twin Cities area was inundated with such unusual amounts of
rain was in July 1987. Two massive storms struck just three days apart that month with
some overlap of the areas of very heavy rain.
The first storm exploded over the western suburbs during the evening of July 20,
dropped torrential rain, and diminished overnight. The greatest amount of rain reported
was close to ten inches in Shakopee. In Edina, the rainfall ranged from about two
inches in the northeast to approximately four inches in the south.
Three days later, on July 23, the Metro area received its greatest rainstorm of record.
Thunderstorms developed over northern sections of the Metro area that evening and
expanded very slowly southward. Torrential rain was continuous at many locations for
two to three hours before tapering off. Most of Edina, located at the center of the
greatest rainfall, was soaked by a little over 11 inches of rain. The 10.0 inches of rain
measured at the international airport that evening still ranks as the greatest official
24 -hour rainfall for Minneapolis -St. Paul. There was significant street and basement
flooding in the area. The combined rainfall amount for Edina for the two storms ranged
from about 12 inches in the northeast to about 15 inches in the south.
Comparison Between 1987 and 1997
1. June, the wettest month on average, was drier than normal in 1987 with only about
half the normal rainfall. June 1997 was drier than normal only in southern Edina while
parts of northern Edina received more rain than normal.
2. The extreme rainfall in 1987 fell mainly in two huge storms just a few days apart.
However, the summer of 1997 had numerous significant rain events between June 28
and July 25 and then another major storm on August 19. The frequent rains caused
persistent very wet soil conditions.
3. The most intense rainfalls occurred on July 23, 1987 and July 1, 1997. 1 personally
observed both storms from near Edina, and I would estimate that the rainfall intensities
were about the same and were tied for the heaviest rain that I have ever seen. The
difference was that the 1997 storm was virtually over in one hour while the 1987 storm
lasted two to three hours before diminishing substantially.
0
Causes of the Excessive Rainfall in 1997
Questions have been raised concerning whether the heavy rains were the result of
climate change caused by global warming or climate variability caused by El Nino.
Although global warming might cause long term effects in Minnesota's climate, those
changes would not suddenly produce extreme weather. El Nino, the warming of the
waters of the eastern Pacific Ocean, does change weather patterns much more quickly,
but it seems to affect the weather in Minnesota mainly during winter.
It is likely that the very unusual rainfall of 1997 was caused by neither global warming
nor El Nino, but by the natural variation of weather patterns. Minnesota is located in
the mid - latitudes near the center of a large continent, and that location is quite
conducive to large variations in weather during a year and from year to year.
Summary
1. Unusually heavy rain began on June 28, 1997 and continued intermittently through
July 25. After a period of drier weather, other storms with heavy rain struck on August
19 and, to a lesser extent, August 30.
2. Total rainfall in Edina during the period June 28 through July 25 ranged from about
14 inches to more than 17 inches. The average rainfall of close to 16 inches was about
five times the historical average of 3.2 inches and represents a rare amount of rain for
this part of the country.
3. A few of the storms were characterized by brief very heavy rain that caused rapid
runoff and flooding. The most unusual storm of the summer was the one -hour
downpour on July 1 which exceeded the 100 -year 1 -hour rainfall mainly in northeastern
Edina.
4. Other storms of longer duration with moderate to heavy rain for periods of hours
were particularly effective at saturating soils. Typical examples were the all -day rains
of July 22 and August 19.
5. The summer of 1997 was unprecedented in modern times for the number of storms
with large amounts of rain.
6. The cumulative effect of the large number of storms with significant rain was to
saturate soils, prevent additional water from soaking into the soil, and enhance runoff.
7
Rainfall (inches) June 28 -July 25, 1997
1 0 4.
14.0
13.4
o0
• 16.1 17.6
15.0
t17.2
14.2 •
15.2
Edina
14.9
14.9 14.1
1•
17.8 12.3
11.8 A •
•
15.3
10.4 14.3
14.2
I
Miles
0 2 4 6 8 10
Figure 1
Rainfall (inches) June 28 - July 25, 1997
Miles
0 1 2 3 4 6 6
Figure 2
20
15
c
�v
w
H 10
d
r
c
5
0
Rainfall in Edina
June 28 - July 25
Average 1996 1997
M Rainfall
Figure 3
4.0
3.5
3.0
2.5
c
2
w
N 2.0
d
t
V
C
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
6/28 7/1 7/4 7/7 7110 7113 7/16 7/19 7/22 7125 7128 7/31 813 816 8/9 8112 8115 8118
Rain Events 6128 - 8119197
0 Average Rainfall
Figure 4
Rainfall (inches) July 1, 1997
3.25 4.08
3,•8 3.71
4.17
2.65
3.60
2.78 •
3.55
Edina 2,35
2.00 • 2.85
2.57 2.12
1.80 •
1.66 2.80
A 40 2.25
2.26
Miles
0 2 4 6 6 f0
Figure 5
Rainfall (inches) July 17, 1997
3.54 1.22
• 1.38
2.40 4.23
1.41
3.50
;r ?2.05
3.45
Edina
.78 3.59 3.71
I qw
.65 1.00 2.44
.31 • •
• .97 2.80
.36 1.46
1.40
Miles
0 2 4 8 8 10
Figure 6
s
Rainfall (inches) July 22, 1997
2.42 ,
1.76
0 0
0 4.38 4.86
4.29
3.79
3.70 •
Edina 2.64
• 3.70
3.19 •
op - 3.34 15.0210 3.17
2.52
• 3.72 4.55
4.06 3.62
4.31
Mmes
0 2 4 6 8 10
Figure 7
NNFPPP-
EMpv�pp-
Np� �
p0
FRAM 5
G OVNG`� G
Stormwater Management
for the City of Edina
Prepared for -
the City of Edina
December 1997
Barr
Engineering Company
Stormwater Management
for the City of Edina
Prepared for
the City of Edina
December 1997
Barr
Engineering Company
8300 Norman Center Drive
Minneapolis, MN 55437
Phone: (612) 832 -2600
Fax: (612) 832 -2601
Stormwater Management
for the
City of Edina
Table of Contents
1.0 Introduction .............................. ............................... 1
1.1 Performance Criteria ..................................................... 1
1.1 Past Events ............................ ............................... 2
1.2.1 July 1997 Rainfall ................. ............................... 4
2.0 Study Areas ............................. ............................... 11
2.1 Limerick Lane — Valley Lane Area .......... ............................... 11
2.2 West 59th Street and Ashcroft Avenue Back -Yard Depression Area ................ 11
2.3 Gleason Road —Dewey Hill Road Backyard Depression Area ..................... 14
2.4 Country Club —Arden Avenue Area ......... ............................... 15
2.5 Biscayne Boulevard — Deville Drive Intersection ............................... 17
2.6 Limerick Lane Low -Point South of Valley Lane ............................... 18
2.7 Division and Rutledge Park Area ................... ..................... 18
2.8 Woodcrest Drive Area along Minnehaha Creek ............................... 21
2.9 Other Study Areas ..................... ............................... 22
I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me
or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly
gistered Professional Engineer under the laws of
the tats of M3nnesoU. .
Date: December 12, 1997 Reg. No. 13303
2327354 \55641 -vYMH i
List of Figures
Figure 1 Precipitation Frequency Curves for the Twin Cities Area ............................
Figure Study Areas .............................. ...............................
Figure 3 Groundwater Conditions Contributing to Sanitary Sewer Inflow — Scenarios 1 through 4 ....
Figure 4 Limerick Lane — Valley Lane Area Improvements ................................
Figure 5 West 59th Street — Ashcroft Avenue Back -Yard Area Improvements ...................
Figure 6 Country Club —Arden Avenue Area Improvements ................ ............. .
Figure 7 Biscayne Boulevard — Deville Drive Intersection Improvements ......................
Figure 8 Limerick Lane—South of Valley Lane Improvements ..............................
2327354 \55641 -1/YMH ii
3
6
7
12
13
16
19
20
1.0 Introduction
The city of Edina has dealt with the impacts of significant rainfall events in 1977, 1987 and 1997.
These rainfall events had different characteristics, which accounts for the different response of the
infrastructure to the runoff event. The objective of the city is to provide a "level of protection" from
a 100 -year frequency storm event for structures throughout the city. This report identifies
additional improvements to the city system necessary to meet this objective.
Subsequent paragraphs will present criteria for drainage system performance, summarize past
improvements in response to the 1977 and 1987 events, and describe recommended changes to the
system in response to the 1977 event.
1.1 Performance Criteria
The city of Edina has selected a storm with a 10 -year frequency recurrence interval for the design
of storm sewer systems and a 100 -year frequency as the basis for the design of stormwater
detention basins. A 10 -year design frequency simply means that, on the average, a storm of that
intensity is expected to occur once in about 10 years. Over a period of 100 years, 10 such events
may occur. However, the storms may not occur with any regularity in time. In other words, in
any year, there is a 10 percent probability of the event occurring. Similarly, a 100 -year frequency
storm event would have a 1 percent chance of occurring in any year.
Since trunk storm sewers are the backbone of the drainage system, they typically are designed and
provide a "level of service" for 10 -year events. Stormwater detention basins are designed on the
basis of a 100 year frequency event, in order to provide the same degree of protection as State law
requires for development adjacent to major rivers and streams (1969 Minnesota Floodplain
Management Act).
The terms "level of service" and "level of protection" need to be explained. By selecting a design
frequency, the city determines the "level of service' which will be provided by the storm sewer
system itself. The "level of service" is defined as the system capacity necessary to convey runoff
water without significant flooding of streets and intersections. Selection of a 10 -year design
frequency means that the city is willing to accept a 10 percent probability that some flooding of
streets and intersections will occur in any year. The "level of protection" is defined as the total
capacity of the storm sewer system including overland flow through streets and channels which
will carry water in excess of that carried by the storm sewer system. As stated, the 10 -year and
2327364 \66641 -]/YMH
100 -year frequency events have been used to provide a "level of service" and "level of protection"
respectively within the city of Edina with the exception of the Morningside area where a 5 -year
and 50 -year frequency event has been used.
1.1 Past Events
Significant rainfall occurred in the city of Edina in 1977, 1987 and 1997. Rainstorms on
August 30, 1977 and July 23, 1987 were single, short - duration rainfall events, with the rainfall in
1997 occurring throughout the month of July. On August 30, 1977, 7.3 inches of rain fell in
approximately a 41i hour time period as recorded at the Minneapolis -St. Paul Airport. On July 23,
1987, 11.3 inches of rain fell in a 51h hour time frame, recorded at a gauging station in Eden
Prairie at the Minnesota Department of Transportation Maintenance Facility. These two
continuously- recording precipitation gauges are close to the Edina area. Surface water runoff from
these single rainstorm events generally exceeded the design capacity of the stormwater conveyance
systems.
Figure 1 illustrates precipitation frequency for the Twin City. area using data from Technical
Paper 40 published by the United States Weather Bureau. Both the August 30, 1977 and July 23,
1987 rainfall events have been plotted on this chart. As previously stated, both of these events
generally exceeded the design parameters used for providing a "level of service" or "level of
protection" within the city. In comparison, the rainfall event of July 23, 1987 was approximately
1.5 times greater that the August, 1977 event in approximately the same time frame. Another
way to view the July, 1987 rainfall event is that it was probably (statistically) the most rain that
has fallen at one time in this small area since the glacial period.
As a result of these two short- duration events, the city made numerous improvements to the
stormwater system. The objective was not to provide a system that would handle runoff from
these events, but to ensure a "level of protection" for the 100 -year frequency storm event, often by
moving surface water from private to public property. Stormwater management improvements
that have been completed by the city since 1977 include:
• Lynmar Area —France Avenue Area
• Oaklawn Avenue Area
• Fred Richards Golf Course
• West 66th Street
• York Avenue
2327354 \55641 -]/YMH 2
• Tower Avenue —St. John's Avenue Area
• Lake Cornelia - West 66th Street
• West 58th Street - Concord Avenue Area
• Highland Lake Outlet
• Mirror Lake Outlet
• Merilane Lane - Annaway Drive Area
• Blake Road Area
• Vernon Avenue - View Lane Area
• Sally Lane - Valley View Road Area
• Naomi Drive - Normandale Park Area
• West 70th Street - West Shore Drive Area
1.2.1 July 1997 Rainfall
The July, 1997 rainfall was different than the 1977 and 1987 rainfalls. The rainfall in July
occurred basically over a 30- day time period rather than occurring in a single rainstorm event.
William Endersen's report, Heavy Rain Events in Edina, Minnesota in 1997, states that rainfall
ranged between 14 inches to more than 17 inches for the period of June 28th to July 25th, with an
average rainfall over Edina during this 28 -day period of 16 inches. A return frequency has not
been given to this rainfall because of the limited historical data available (Figure 1, the
Precipitation Frequency Curves for the Twin City Area, extends to only a 10 -day time period).
Mr. Endersen stated that July, 1997 had the second greatest monthly rainfall for the metro area
since official modern records began in 1891 and that the 28 -day rainfall in parts of Edina was
nearly equal to the greatest official monthly rainfall since 1891.
Since this rainfall total was distributed over a longer duration, the storm water systems were
capable of handling the surface water runoff except in a few short intense rainfall periods. The
areas that this study reviewed and presented in later sections of this report are:
• Limerick Lane - Valley Lane Area
• Backyard depression areas located in the:
• West 59th Street — Ashcroft Avenue Area
• Dewey Hill Road — Gleason Road Area
• Country Club - Arden Avenue Area
• Biscayne Boulevard - Deville Drive Intersection
• Limerick Lane depression south of Valley Lane
• Division and Rutledge Park Area
• Woodcrest Drive Area along Minnehaha Creek
• Other Study Areas
2327354 \55641 -1/YMH 4
The location of the study areas throughout the city are shown on Figure 2. The purpose of
analyzing these areas was to recommend additional improvements that should be made to provide
the desired "level of protection" within these areas by moving water from private to public areas.
Generally, the problems that occurred in July appear to be the result of totally saturated soil
conditions resulting from the 16 inches of rainfall. Clay -rich subsoils prevalent throughout Edina
minimize infiltration of rain water through the soil, causing it to build -up within the layers of fill
or soil above the clay. The upper soil layers and the soil backfilled against home foundations have
higher permeabilities than the clay subsoils. Since water can flow through these non -clay layers
easier, they become saturated. Figure 3, Scenarios 1 through 3, shows the flow pattern of water
seeping through various soil conditions. In the clay soils, water can not infiltrate downward
quickly, therefore it flows laterally towards structure foundations. Once the water reaches the
backfill areas along the foundation walls, the water then flows downward with potential impacts
on low floors of structures. This typically results in seepage through basement walls and floors.
Figure 3, Scenario 4, shows the numerous routes water can take once it reaches the foundation of
a structure. Water can migrate to the sanitary sewer by relatively direct .routes such as
foundation drains that are directly connected to the sanitary sewer, or by more indirect routes,
such as cracks in the foundation, basement floor cracks, and wall cracks that allow water to flow
directly to a floor drain or sump system that discharges to the sanitary sewer. Another possible
route into the sanitary sewer occurs under the floor where drainage sand may enable water to flow
into leaky plumbing below the basement floor. In this scenario, moisture in the basement may not
even be noticed.
Because of the saturated soil conditions, groundwater played a major role in the elevation of lakes
and ponding basins which remained high for an extended period. After surface water was routed
to and through these basins, groundwater inflows sustained the levels of these same systems.
2327354 \55641 -]/YMH 5
❑
U
w
Y
F-
a
1 - Limerick Lane /Valley Lane Area 5 - Biscayne Blvd /Deville Dr Intersection
2 - West 59th Street /Ashcroft Ave Area 6 - Limerick Lane South of Valley Lane
3 - Dewey Hill Road /Gleason Road Area 7 - Division and Rutledge Park Area
4 - Country Club /Arden Ave Area 8 - Woodcrest Drive Along Minnehaha Creek Figure 2
STUDY AREAS
Scenario 2
ANY TYPE OF SOIL
HIGH WATER TABLE ANY TYPE OF SOIL, HIGH WATER TABLE
Preupiuenn
p'ee,p -t— There is always a risk of basement flooding with this
situation.
Scenario 3
CLAY SOILS
DEEP WATER TABLE CLAY SOILS, DEEP WATER TABLE
Pracip�ta4pn There is a risk of basement flooding with this situation
Precipitripn
if the rainfall continues for a long duration. Intense,
NOW, short duration rains tend to produce runoff. Long periods
axkfi11__ 5ue a of rain allow the soil to become saturated.
Scenario 3 (cont.)
CLAY SOILS
DEEP WATER TABLE CLAY SOILS, DEEP WATER TABLE
As the rain continues, topsoil and backfill around the
Precipitation Prec piU —
foundation, which tends to be looser and more permeable
than the clay subsoil, become saturated. The clay subsoil
°vr I scl.y does not allow for the deep percolation of the infiltrated
groundwater.
Figure 3
GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS CONTRIBUTING
7 TO SANITARY SEWER INFLOW
Scenario 1
SANDY SOIL
DEEP WATER TABLE
SANDY DEEP SOIL, DEEP WATER TABLE
Precipi'piipr ❑recipiat,on
There is little risk of basement flooding with this situation
because the rainwater can infiltrate into the soil where
sane sane
it continues to percolate downward to the water table.
Scenario 2
ANY TYPE OF SOIL
HIGH WATER TABLE ANY TYPE OF SOIL, HIGH WATER TABLE
Preupiuenn
p'ee,p -t— There is always a risk of basement flooding with this
situation.
Scenario 3
CLAY SOILS
DEEP WATER TABLE CLAY SOILS, DEEP WATER TABLE
Pracip�ta4pn There is a risk of basement flooding with this situation
Precipitripn
if the rainfall continues for a long duration. Intense,
NOW, short duration rains tend to produce runoff. Long periods
axkfi11__ 5ue a of rain allow the soil to become saturated.
Scenario 3 (cont.)
CLAY SOILS
DEEP WATER TABLE CLAY SOILS, DEEP WATER TABLE
As the rain continues, topsoil and backfill around the
Precipitation Prec piU —
foundation, which tends to be looser and more permeable
than the clay subsoil, become saturated. The clay subsoil
°vr I scl.y does not allow for the deep percolation of the infiltrated
groundwater.
Figure 3
GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS CONTRIBUTING
7 TO SANITARY SEWER INFLOW
Scenario 3 (cont.)
CLAY SOILS
DEEP WATER TABLE CLAY SOILS, DEEP WATER TABLE
Eventually, the soils around the house become completely
P.
r saturated. The surrounding topsoil provides additional water
that can flow toward and into the home.
W n°r TabN
Scenario 4
GROUNDWATER FLOW PATHS
TO SANITARY SEWER GROUNDWATER FLOW PATHS TO SANITARY SEWER
The elements that can contribute to storm water getting into
— - - the sanitary sewer through or around a home foundation
,.a. Tyro °a" W.II
include:
- Cracks in the basement floor or walls
sir - s-, P °m
- Floor drains connected to the sanitary sewer
- Sump pumps discharging to the sanitary sewer
- Interior and exterior foundation drains connected
to the sanitary sewer.
Scenario 4 (cont.)
GROUNDWATER FLOW PATH
TO SANITARY SEWER GROUNDWATER FLOW PATH TO SANITARY SEWER
Prarntaiion
Seepage through basement walls provides a flow path of
stormwater getting into the sanitary sewer.
\ E><cevalM Seepage Through Wall
BaddM
Fluur
Clay \ Dr n
Scenario 4 (cont.)
GROUNDWATER FLOW PATH
TO SANITARY SEWER GROUNDWATER FLOW PATH TO SANITARY SEWER
arenm�,on^
Seepage through cracks and other openings provides a flow
path of stormwater getting into the sanitary sewer.
\ E.cn
Bad"
\\\ Seepage Through
i racks or Olher Openings
Clay
Suu l
s.wP,
Figure 3 (cont.)
GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS CONTRIBUTING
TO SANITARY SEWER INFLOW
L
GROUNDWATER FLOW PATH
TO SANITARY SEWER
Evaratbn I,
gaddll
Sump F
Pump lmr
Cry Drain
SuoeoY I
C Saneary
Sawnr
GROUNDWATER FLOW PATH
TO SANITARY SEWER
prec, --
Foundation Drain
Scenario 4 (cont.)
GROUNDWATER FLOW PATH TO SANITARY SEWER
Seepage beneath the basement floor provides a flow path of
stormwater getting into the sanitary sewer.
Scenario 4 (cont.)
GROUNDWATER FLOW PATH TO SANITARY SEWER
Seepage through the basement floor provides a flow path of
stormwater getting into the sanitary sewer.
Scenario 4 (cont.)
GROUNDWATER FLOW PATH TO SANITARY SEWER
A sump pump discharging to the floor drain provides a flow
path of stormwater getting into the sanitary sewer.
Scenario 4 (cont.)
GROUNDWATER FLOW PATH TO SANITARY SEWER
Exterior foundation drains connected to the floor drain
provides a flow path of stormwater getting into the sanitary sewer.
Figure 3 (cont.)
GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS CONTRIBUTING
9 TO SANITARY SEWER INFLOW
E.—t on
RaW#
Seepage
Under F,
Floor Dram
Cby
S-9
Sanitary
GROUNDWATER FLOW PATH
TO SANITARY SEWER
I
ErwvdWn
Ba +fiY
i
!. Seepage
Through
Clay
Floor
SWfOY
_-
Evaratbn I,
gaddll
Sump F
Pump lmr
Cry Drain
SuoeoY I
C Saneary
Sawnr
GROUNDWATER FLOW PATH
TO SANITARY SEWER
prec, --
Foundation Drain
Scenario 4 (cont.)
GROUNDWATER FLOW PATH TO SANITARY SEWER
Seepage beneath the basement floor provides a flow path of
stormwater getting into the sanitary sewer.
Scenario 4 (cont.)
GROUNDWATER FLOW PATH TO SANITARY SEWER
Seepage through the basement floor provides a flow path of
stormwater getting into the sanitary sewer.
Scenario 4 (cont.)
GROUNDWATER FLOW PATH TO SANITARY SEWER
A sump pump discharging to the floor drain provides a flow
path of stormwater getting into the sanitary sewer.
Scenario 4 (cont.)
GROUNDWATER FLOW PATH TO SANITARY SEWER
Exterior foundation drains connected to the floor drain
provides a flow path of stormwater getting into the sanitary sewer.
Figure 3 (cont.)
GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS CONTRIBUTING
9 TO SANITARY SEWER INFLOW
GROUNDWATER FLOW PATH
TO SANITARY SEWER
EAc
PnJirill I
Cay
sCWY
Foundation Drain
Scenario 4 (cont.)
GROUNDWATER FLOW PATH TO SANITARY SEWER
Interior foundation drains connected to the floor drain
provides a flow path of stormwater getting into the sanitary sewer.
10
Figure 3 (cont.)
GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS CONTRIBUTING
TO SANITARY SEWER INFLOW
2.0 Study Areas
2.1 Limerick Lane — Valley Lane Area
Residents in the area of Limerick Lane and Valley Lane indicated that after intense rainfall
events, inundation of the back -yard areas north of Valley Lane occurs. Two existing trunk storm
sewer systems that convey runoff from the area directly north of the Crosstown and from the area
east along the railroad tracks. There are three existing stormwater inlets in the backyard area, to
provide an outlet from this area. However, according to area residents, water flows backwards into
the back -yard area during intense rainstorms. The natural surface overflow from this area is from
the north to the south toward Valley Lane. A field survey of the area indicates that the lowest
point where water actually can flow away from the area is 0.2 feet higher than the lowest finish
floor elevation at 6401 Doron Lane.
It is recommended that a positive surface overflow be constructed that has a maximum elevation of
1 foot lower than the lowest finished floor elevation. Figure 4 shows the location of a proposed
drainage swale to be graded along the rear lot lines to provide this overflow. The preliminary
design proposes a swale with a bottom width of 10 feet with 5:1 side slopes. The elevation of Valley
Drive would need to be lowered by approximately 1.5 feet enabling the drainage pattern to be
directed to and through city property to Nine Mile Creek. The backyard area would be restored
with sod enabling the area to be mowed, as it is currently. Temporary inundation will continue to
occur in this backyard area; however water will flow over the low -point at an elevation lower than
the lowest finished floor elevation.
A estimated cost for this improvement is $15,000.
2.2 West 59th Street and Ashcroft Avenue Back -Yard Depression
Area
Figure 3 shows a land- locked depression area located in the back -yard area of homes in the West
59th Street and Ashcroft Avenue area. Being land- locked means that this depression area does not
have a piped outlet enabling the area to drain. The outlet for surface water from this area is
either via surface overflow, once the water depth becomes great enough, and through evaporation
and seepage. Unless the water can be directed away from this area, several homes and garages
will be affected. The elevation of the depression area is at a low enough elevation that a gravity
outlet can not be provided. A pumped outlet is therefore required. As shown on Figure 5, if an
outlet is provided, it would be directed to the storage area on school property.
2327354 \55641 -]/YMH 11
IV
BEEHIVE C.B.
0.- 850.94 EL =8553
BEEHIVE C. INVERT C.B. EL -854.0
EL- 849.18 - 844.72
BEEHIVE C. E1.-84 MH -850.9 -85 .4 /
EL-8 t 42 850.2
x -853.5 EL= 51.9 / - 495 .9 / x0.- 7
\ \ 852 5 2.1 L =849.9 �/ EL - 0. 0 TP Al ��c #3/ /� EL -551
k E SANITARY MANHOLE L�852.5 155.9
56%
EL= 856.7x/ / �E\ (� a- 85200
\ \x EL -!y I x
EL a =655.z
0. =658.5 / \ x
0. =854.0 l E /
BLL82.ix/ < EL- EL-
EL 54.4 x xll )) Ei« !: x EL 56.
x EL =8536 1l 52L 2 E -859.4 / ) OR (LOW EP
xa =853.8 / ' >.'x 84.3 851.8 EL =853.7 EL =856.9
EL -850.5
DOOR (LOW ENTRY #6321) x0. =852.6
1 EL 53.3 :yF:::i:: >:;•.3 I 1
EL= 854.3 1
x
EL 4.8 EL =850.7 .:�' 1 EL =853.2
I EL= 3.9 > ' . EL =851.0 / + DOOR (LOW ENTRY #6332)
EL =852.8
50.0
-850.9 I(
\ x EL -852.7
xEL =85x7 ; # ?.:' »4 _ EL= 852.6
\ \ xEL =851.7 / 4EL= 85SrxEL =854.4
EL -854.9
DOOR (LOW ENTRY #6401) L =853.4 m N hh
EL =852.6 xEL =852 :<' >. ?' a0 /q)x EL =BS7.o
x2.8 -_ .. m aB5�.01 EL= 55.7
xl
\ \ xEL= 18
Z
IT! x�1 =852.
mm L= 5 ))) 1 >'�`�"•�� � / DOOR (LOW ENTRY #6402)
z x /xEL =B .7 EL =854.1
F =8 .3
a T x =� 2A .'.': •'' - EL =esz EL-854.2
°9
mu)
EL 5755// ': DRAINAGE SWALE CENTERLINE.
0.7 =85 .. ';....:.�:.; 0. =854.1
/ x L
EL -8532 =652. .•...'.''.' I
ITT � xEL -66��
?< '� J x� 6 WINDOW LOW ENTRY #6408)
DOOR (LOW ENTRY #6405) �j ������� ,
EL =852.9 xa- 859r.EL -85Y.[ : ; N / xEL =esa EL =854.8
r,z
L ��4.3
EL' PP- ld52.8 x EL-8 m , \ EL =855. EL-857.0
851.9
x EL- 3.3
x EL-852.a,
EL -852.6
\ a- 0. =85"'IL =853.8
WINDOW (LOW ENTRY #5409) -EL= 853.8 /
Z EL =851.6 EL =653.6 xEL - 153.4
EL -654.6
£i L =852.9 /
J xEL =6 DOOR (LOW ENTRY #6412)
xEL =853.9 � ` a =1 �/ EL =854.8
B63 EL 857.6
0 / x W
Of
� -852.1
O a =854.2 x EL =853.0 / x EL 57.6 Z
xEL =153.4 /x
E x � EL -858.1
/ 3�
EL- 857.0
:: :: xx \ Q
�TBM 7NH /201 x EL- P52_3 xEL or EL =853.4 t .
EL-854.09 TP NAIL - 52.6
=850.4 EL -853.2 ,BL
EL =850.4 / JAWW MANHOLE
E -�4Z�
L -854.2
W1MH\ - 53.9
LEL- 850.29 _ 4
ST M •. M
852 M
E =850.9 EL = M J✓ \
EL
243 \
- 849.84 EL- 851.2 ]
-`7
MARY MANHOLE
/ tA.- 834.77
IB
` C +EL =854.5 - 854.02
8SO xEL =B
r
m
a�
M
D
D -n
z
�m =
01 m
m <
'C a
mr
zm
r
z
m
x =EL =649.51
849.3 � I
x I
\
x EL =84�
EL =84 =Ba6.5\
/ x EL 84
x a =845.5
pjYS. a CREEK
`�E1- 843.87
F �
O
-1 °
�a
0_0
5 V
J
c�
\
ma
0
o
\
d m
INVERT 42' CMPx\ 36' CMP
EL-842.93 x INVERT 3 a- 842.50
<
17d
�
m5
m �►
° o
Cl) z
ta
N
m
.�
m
O
0_0
5 V
J
p
m r
p
0
o
m -�
wzm
F C)
�
m5
Cl) z
m
O
d
„I
m
m
F-+
L_ O
O
NV =879.
INV =8171.81
I NV. NW =B 8. f
Q
_&=878.4§ 0
INV. N -879 23*
_ —
INV. S /E =8 lz
)9 1 4705 I 5928
I I 5932
I 5940
I I 5
4704 944
I I ..J%J%Jv I I
I
5837 5836
I I I 1 5840 1
I 5841 F - -- 1
5844_
! I
590 5900
1 1 59 I 5904
o 5909 5908
Iv —�-
I 5913 5912 1
1 5917 5916
I I 1 -- -1- - --
I— I �
5921 I 5920
10" FORCEMAIN 3 CFS PUMPED cD
1 925 OUTL 9 4 c=n
I
1" I -- - - - - -- Q
I 5929 I
I ; - - ---) 5928
I I I 5933— -
I
I
r5937 �- 5936
I 5945 5940 I
I I
1 ..ruvv
r - - --
5837
1 5841
5845
59TH
5901
1 5905
r__ - --
5909
1 5913
5917
5921
r — — .
5929
5933
1 5941
5945
-t- �- -� I r----- r-- --� - --
0 100 200 Figure 5
1 1 WEST 59th STREET - ASHCROFT AVE
Scale in Feet BACK -YARD AREA IMPROVEMENTS
13
The city, in the past, has considered similar land - locked backyard depression areas as a private
drainage "problem" and addressed by the area residents. Providing a pumped outlet for handling
stormwater is typically the last option used because of the associated costs in operation,
maintenance and providing auxiliary power supply. To provide a "level of protection" for the
structures in this area, a 3 c.f.s. (cubic feet -per- second), 1,350 gallon- per - minute, pumped outlet is
required.
An estimated cost for providing this outlet is between $50,000 to $80,000, depending upon the
pumping facility provided.
2.3 Gleason Road —Dewey Hill Road Backyard Depression Area
Edina's records show that in the mid- 1970's a private storm sewer system was installed to provide
a low -level piped outlet for the back -yard areas of homes being constructed along Schey Drive.
This system was connected to the existing municipal system along Gleason Road.
A subsequent connection to this system has been made to provide an outlet for the back -yard
depression area at 7309 Gleason Road. It has been reported that surface water had an impact on
this structure in 1987 and again in 1997. A hydrologic/hydraulic analysis of the existing drainage
system indicates that sufficient storage capacity and outflow capacity is not available to provide a
"level of protection" for the existing structure.
To provide a "level of protection" for this structure, several options are available: (1) the existing
storm sewer could be replaced and/or a companion system installed to provide additional outflow
capacity, (2) provide flood protection of the existing structure by constructing a berm between the
structure and the storm sewer at an elevation that is above the 100 -year frequency flood elevation
and (3) raise the walk -out patio door to an elevation above the surface overflow elevation from the
back -yard area.
If a new storm sewer system is installed, it would be necessary to replace the existing 12 -inch
system with a 18 -inch system. This system should be disconnected from the existing municipal-
system with an outlet to Braemar Golf Course. A companion system with a capacity of 5 cubic feet
per second (c.f.s.) would be required if the entire system were not replaced.
The surface overflow from this area is to the south to Dewey Hill Road. If the existing system
remains in -place and either flood protection or a raising of the patio door be considered, the
2327364 \66641 -]/YMH 14
elevation of the berm or patio door must be set at or above 847.6 M.S.L., which is 1 foot above the
surface overflow elevation.
It is recommended that the homeowner consider utilizing the city's existing flood protection
procedure in making moglifications necessary to provide a "level of protection" for the structure at
7309 Gleason Road.
2.4 Country Club —Arden Avenue Area
An existing depression is located on Arden Avenue between Country Club Road and Bridge Street.
Intense rainfall events have resulted in inundation at this low -point impacting structures at 4609
and 4611 Arden Avenue in 1987 and 1997. The storm sewer system that serves this area was
installed in the 1920's. Figure 6 shows the study area location of the existing storm sewer. As
shown, the existing storm sewer is located diagonally from Arden Avenue, between the houses, to
Bruce Avenue. The system ultimately discharges to Minnehaha Creek east of St. Stephen's
church.
To improve the drainage conditions in this area, several improvement options were reviewed. The
first option was to "pick -up ", intercept, surface water runoff along Bridge Street, thereby reducing
the tributary drainage area to this low - point. A storm sewer would be installed along
Bridge Street conveying runoff to the Mill Pond. In reviewing the city's 2 -foot topographic
mapping, sufficient elevation difference is not available between the Bridge Street - Drexel - Casco-
Bruce -Arden Area and the Mill Pond to provide a gravity outlet. Consideration was given to
providing underground storage with a pumped outlet from this area to the Mill Pond. However,
because of the limited area available for the necessary storage and the size of the pumping facility
required, this option is not economically feasible.
The second option would be to install a system south along Arden to County Club Road and
ultimately to Minnehaha Creek. This alignment however, results in the system being installed
very deep, approximately 30 feet, because of the significant increase in surface elevation from the
Arden Avenue low -point to the intersection of Arden and Country Club Road. Following the
alignment of the existing system is not possible because of the limited space available between the
existing structures. To provide a "level of protection" for the two lowest homes adjacent to the low -
point, a 60 -inch diameter storm sewer system is required from the Arden Avenue low -point to
Minnehaha Creek.
2327354 \55641 -]/YMH 15
4522 I ~ 5- - 4526 I 1 4525 I 4524 4525 J 4524 4525 I I I i �� i� 4704
1 4523 -i 1---- t- •- - -� - -- - --+ - --
71 N N \ ���il Q 1 �O�Y \4707 I \1rI
4528 ' ' 4527 4526 4527 t 4526 ' ' 4527 1 I I 1
4524 4525- ( 4530 4529 1 - 4528 1 1 4529 1 4528 4529 II i �` \` 4709 / /� \\ 4706 I 1 `` 4709 I 0 200 400
4526 1 4527 r -- - - -� -- �- -- - - -- - -- I
I I Scale in Feet
1 4532 4531 4530 1 4531 4530 � p8 I O6 104 I p2 � � � c i
- - - -� 0 X0:6 o 0 48 ` - - $fT" -�- t{�°1�u 4531 _ - L- -L -�- - \ 4713 / / I 47! f
_ _ I BRIDGE LA
- -- -- - - - --
4600 F46Oi 4600 �46� ! 4600 4601 _ _1_ _ 4600 4601 1 Og I_ 07� - 05� - _ \(/ / \� _ - - - -1 - - - - , 4713
- - -- � -- �-• - -� �-� - - - --I 4717 �I 4602 1 03 4602 I 1 4603 4602 I 4716 4715
4602 1 4603 I _ _ I _ _ _ I _ _ _ 1_ ` 4603 I 1 I J - - 1
- - - 4604 4605 r 4604 1 1 4605 4604 r - - - I 1 I I / 4012 1 - - - I
4604 a 1 4605 I- - --� w--- -� - - -� w ___4 --- X05--- �I-_L_ OPTI _N 2 4719 �- 4717 - - - - -� I L
-- - r - - --i- --4 a� 116 - -� - 4� 4 I -A602 - - �- - 4606 • 4607 _ -1 -X800' i f+f� �"IF �� �. - - - - - - - - - -� -J
4606 4607 I _
w _ r 4608 ° 4609 r 4608 4609 t 4608 - -
- -- c� __ ___ w __ ___ 1 460960" Qa - -� 4107 , 4101 T4009�051 -�-- - ,-- T- 1 -r - -- 1
4608 0 4609 4610 I 461! - ¢ - - - [4801 I I I 1400!1 39131 3909 13905 - 4800 �1 I
4610 m 461! 4610 _ I
-- II-- -� - - -� r---- �- - - -, --- �- - - -� 4611 I I f 14801 1 I 1 I 1 I 11 4804 LW f
4610 I 4611 1 8612 - 14613 I 4612 1 f 4613 I 4612 1 - -- I 4804�I; 1� L I_- I I_ I 1 I k 1 I 1 I---- W
46! 4 i 1 4615 r 4614 1 f 46! 5 4614 1 46! 5 4808 i 4807 _ L 4808 1 - �- - �- - L - L 1 _ _I_ _J_ _ _LL _ 4eoe J I I
f 4809
4612 1 4613 I_
- - - -j 4616 � ' 4617 1 4616 ' ' 4617 I 4616 1 1 4617 4811 I 4812 j 4813 I I 1
Ili 4H r46f5 -1 �- - _ ___ ___ 1 - - -- 4812 I 4812
4618 1 ' 4619 ~ 4618 4619 * 4618 �1 -� i___1_ - - -� `
4616 I 1 4617 �' -- 1 i----- �- - - -i r---- 1___ -+Z� 1 4619_- 4816 I ' 4815 1 4816 i c 1 4817 I 1 CAI
4620 ] 462! I 4620 4621 I 4620 i 4621 �L- 8
�- - ----I F---- { - - - -{° ---- � - - --10 --�1 I ' 4819 1 4820 � Z 4824 1
46!81 4619 4622 I 1 4623 4622 I 1 4623 4820 1 I 1 s 1 4821 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 I I
- - -- r - - - -- L4625 I '-- -- _ 4622 4623__ - - -- i -- 4620 1 4621 4624 I 4624 4625 I 4624 4625 �I 4824 1 1 4825 - I 4824 I 1 4825 I I
- - - -- 4830
4626 I i 4627 -� 4626 1 T---- �- - - ---� �---- �I -- - --I � -�'- j r - - -I-- 1 1
4622 i 4623 1 _ _ _ _ _ I 1 1 4627 I 4626 1 1 4627 II 4828 I 4829 I 4828 4829 I 4846
__ _ -
- 4626 1 1 4629 J 4628 1 8629 4628 -6 - - J I 832 1- - - - -1 - - I 1 f - - 1- r- I I- - - - 0 f
- - 4624 - I. - _ I 1_ - _ _ I 1 ' 4832 1 1 4833 1 I 1 4850
I 1
I ' 4625 I 4630 ' 4631 r 4630 I- - - - T - - - ~ ' - - -� 4835 r - - - I I 1 4854 I
4626 I I --I 4631 4630 I 463 4836 L4837 3942 3936 -3 3932 -3 3928 -30 3922 3948
F - - --r- -4632 '- - -L - -J I----- J- - - -� -- I1 483-------------------1-L---
- 4627 1 �--
1- - - 1 i 4633 4632 i i I 4632 i ' 4633 - - _ _ 49TH ST N
---1 -- - --
_ _ 4633 _ _� r- - - - -� I 4900 a
I I 4634 J-- -- I w r - - - -- T - - --
---- 1 4629 114635 o I Q 4901 I 1 - -1 -- 1 �-- ,- - - - - -� I
1 I- 62 - r - F 3 - - 1 4634 � r 4637 � - - � � 0 - - 1 4009 i 4005 i 400! 1 3949 1 3945 13941 -431 3935 13925 139231 3901 1 f
4630 I �- -- ' 1 I _ -- I1 4904 i 4905 1 1 1 I I I I I
4633 1 4638 4637 r903L pT10 11 4901 --� I I I -
\�-- J- - - -� -- o 4900 1 - - --I1 49081 - - ---�
COUNTRY CLUB RD ° ' 4903 �- - - 1 4909 - J m 8913 ','a j, 1 c8 1A _ - LC Jlr 1 1
_ _ _ _ - - _ eB3. 7e R 86.80 TR -I 4900 4904 ' 1 4912 I ce IzRcvs. ez T5 c9 30 ouTL. a za 4229 14225 422! r 4215 4209 �07 4916 -20 I 14203E -- - -- I R 65. d4
4902 ' _ _ I a I' .7s. I .82.00 INV. 78 s4 ~ 3l1d® I3 ce z2
I 1 4905- - - ---f I 4915 - -1 I $ N sT MNONH B 1626.57 b 944 1 TA 86. oz p m TR C'92!274
74
( I - -i 4906 1-4907 I1 4916 I 49! 7 1 _ `�N71 - - INV. 80.7 - - INV. 78.07
' _ _ I u. 7 12• - - s iru_. s. 7.07 c� ze 1 KH -4904 1 4907 4908 f 4909 4920 ' 1 4921 - 1 � - TR 869.60 9 27, _ NN 17 72 IH 9 °s
-- ,1- -1- --� -L -� L --L- -- L- - -- 11 __ 1 7�T� 29 _ r
- -4 1 I INV. 082.61 15.5' °+`y I 7 1 T7�. 03 1� -M.N. 7A. °2 - TR
1 \ / 4906 '� 1 4909 I 4910 ' - - - �r 4924 I 1 4925 I E e TR 6 1 4624 IN
_ _ _ 1 491!
1Qj
\ 1 / - 4908 11 - - 4912 ' J - - _ 1 N. 82.75 I� N. 79. 5\Q • 3 ip INV 7/ 4'CI rR 10
_ _ rR 86.5° S 79.0 0
C; N. 83 12 C 880. T5 0
1 03 04 05 06 1 _ _ '0 ' - - 49 f 5 I I sraRN NH 1 ce 3 - 6' ! _ 1 ' s 7f�le
I 4911 a 1 K7 8
I`- -' /� I r - - - 49! 4 i = - - -{ I 4928 I 1 4929 -1- - - ez 3 i 6.
6 o z• . ABC' "i' N 7b. I
- - \ ° I --1 N. BD. 5 12 N. 93.0 TR 6 CB
I 02 1 07 I 4910 1 4913 �- - - -, 4917 11 -- I I I /��,j INV. 71.7 9 83.71 E. 81.3 'CIP 18.. 6 H A_ Q _ - J 1 - 4916 1 - - - 4932 I N. 9!. f �-IE° r L I CIP 1 E B!. 5 I� .03 N. 92.96 11✓L.IL 71� 54 W. 79. 1 I
[08 I 4400 4914 I 4919 1r v ' 919 68 5241 tY I 1 9 3 ' z J I °I I a TR 82.
L J -L 660. 436 4933 4200 4! 20 4 ( eT. s 2J �4 3940 ° 3922 39! 4 390 1
0' 524��1t �_ L_ -- IN. �- I_ TR93.oi
C8 45
E 870. 1 M. 3 INV 075.97 `Q6p � MH 46 C
- -------- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- -- A". b1- gee. E x.600.3..3 50TH ST M R e T 1 II
- INge R. -1v W. 95--------------
V 9� . 9 I V 0%. 22 ' INV 876.34 7 - - - - - X9 1° m- i.
- - - -� - - - - r -h7' 12'RCP Y NV 076.53 iR 666. 86. 76.
4441 f 5000 I I 500! 1 - -r- F-412f� -_ -1 1� I s 7 (J T 3 t�f 77.
1 1 I 500 001 215 -13 14211 -091 4201 1 1 INV.873. 9 I I °'I m I °" °I II': :
37'15-RCP is gg 1 1 o rn rn mrn E.8
1 1 1 I I I INV.01U67'7 H 1 I I c I 1 mI m I mmI m m 111 + •I 1 H Ii
1 5002 5003 5002 003 1 a 6•vcv ! HER
I - �- -- - -- - -- �- - -- 1� a I 1 Ll_1JII `� 7.55 cIP >_ I Figure 6
I I - - w l INV. en. ofi C. s 3.1z•o -z' I _ 1
co z 5004 f 1 5005 5004 5005 : '� 48.1' CB 52 I e 1 I 1 c;P
.. ITR 875.79 I J __ a _ -L -__ -- ( rRez.l40 TR�z, I°m' a c'P I COUNTRY CLUB - ARDEN AVE AnmD
!B'�ie9 I I - - - - -- - - i -- -- F- - - - y�I 5016 i R 50! 7 ' . 767 " �• __
I' .. o. e! ,n ac
�� �- I -- ,/ ' I E7azs1D_ _ r�Dre� � AREA IMPROVEMENTS
16
An estimated cost for this option is $875,000. This assumes that the pipe system would be
excavated (open -cut) to be installed. If the system was to be tunneled to minimize the construction
distribution, the estimate cost would be $2,250,000.
A third option would be to install a system from the Arden Avenue low -point east to Maple Road.
A 60 -inch storm sewer would again be required to provide a "level of protection" for the structures
adjacent to the low- point. The pipe system would continue easterly along Maple Avenue and
West 48th Street to the land- locked depression area located south of West 48th Street. The system
from Arden Avenue to Maple Avenue between the existing houses would be installed by
"tunneling" because of the limited available space. An advantage of the system in this location is
that an existing back -yard drainage problem, reported by the resident at 4804 Maple Road, could
also be resolved. The city would be required to develop a pumping plan, from the land- locked
depression, once the water level reaches a specified elevation. Historically, high water problems/
conditions within this depression area have not been reported. The city may also, if necessary, be
required to obtain drainage and utility easements. The estimated cost of this option is $720,000.
Because of cost, other options that the city may consider to assist the two home owners is to
undertake on -site flood protection that would provide a "level of protection" greater than what
currently exists but less than for the 100 -year frequency storm event. The flood protection option
has been looked at briefly but it appears that without significant modification, e.g., raising the
structures, flood protection would not provide a 100 -year "level of protection'. This option can be
explored further as directed by the city. The purchase of flood insurance by the homeowners is
always an available option for consideration.
2.5 Biscayne Boulevard — Deville Drive Intersection
The city has received correspondence dated October 21, 1997 from Robert Sullivan, 6409 Biscayne
Boulevard. Mr. Sullivan has indicated that the existing storm sewer system at the intersection of
Biscayne Boulevard and Deville Drive has not been able to handle surface water runoff from
intense rainstorms. This has resulted in water flowing between the Sullivan's and their neighbor
to the west. Surface water has not affected the existing structures, however, Mr. Sullivan has
requested that this issue be reviewed.
2327354 \55641 -1/YMH 17
A field survey of the area, Figure 7, was completed. The survey shows that should an overflow
from the intersection occur, surface water is directed between the houses to Walnut Ridge Park. It
is recommended that a drainage swale, as shown on Figure 7, be constructed to provide an efficient
and effective overflow from the intersection. A swale will confine and direct runoff to be directed
to city property — Walnut Ridge Park. A depth of flow of approximately 1 foot will occur in swale of
this configuration for the 100 -year frequency storm event.
An estimated cost for this improvement is $2,500.
2.6 Limerick Lane Low -Point South of Valley Lane
As with the previous study area, it has been reported by residents in the Limerick Lane — Valley
Lane area that the existing storm sewer at the low -point does not have sufficient capacity to
handle runoff from intense rainstorm events. The hydraulic analysis of the system indicates that
the system provides a "level of service" for meeting the city design criteria, however, with more
intense rainstorms, water flows between houses to Nine Mile Creek.
To more efficiently and effectively convey runoff through the yards, it is recommended that a
drainage swale be graded. Figure 8 shows a field survey completed for this area and "a
recommended location and configuration for the drainage swale. The drainage swale should be
located to minimize impacts on the existing ,tree, if possible.
A estimated cost for the proposed improvements is $2,500.
2.7 Division and Rutledge Park Area
Mr. Richard Flumerfelt, 5225 Division Street, contacted us at the October 20th Council meeting
regarding surface water inundating Division Street after intense rainfall events. He also had
concerns regarding the drainage patterns and conveyance of surface water through Division and
Rutledge Park. A field meeting with Mr. Flumerfelt was arranged to discuss and view his
concerns. He indicated that in July, 1997, structures were not impacted by the street inundation,
however, surface water was close to entering an existing garage. He also indicated that the
drainageway from the storm sewer outlet, in the park, to Minnehaha Creek was overgrown with
natural vegetation impeding the flow to the creek.
2327354 \55641 -1/YMH 18
< 5' TOP WIDTH 10
V DEEP
3'
TYPICAL SECTION -
OVERFLOW DRAINAGE SWALE
Not to Scale
xEL =195.5
xEL -194.2
HOUSE i
/xEL =.
L= 202 2'
EL =198.5
xEL =198.3 L2o
GARAGE EL ='98.5
GL
pR 11D�o gL.OpE
xEL =197.7
/ xEL =201.2
EL =201.3
xEL =201.3
xEL =201.5
xEL =201.7 /
1
TP (JAIL #
1.9 '
xEL�201.2
I
.4 xEL =201.3
01.0
/ L =200.7
\ / EL =t
xEL -2099 EL= 200.1
EL= 200.9x DRIVEWAY
xEL- 201e�. -tom
5' IW DE EL =200.
;EASEMENT
GARAGE EL-203.7 I
-204.4
DRIVEWAY #6409:
xEL =202.3 `
� 0 20 40
L I I
\ / Scale in Feet
EL =204. t
/ x =20 7.0 I
=20018
xEL 200.6 • EL.4.0 I I I
EL =200.9 .9
x Ip200. I
fiL =2008
I �
�xEL =203.6
@ 00.951 \
x 1200.4
EL =200.7
DEL =205.1
�L =200 EL-200.7 \ \ \
EL =200. 0.2 x ='18Q_ .3 .3
200.9 EL-201.7
I x - 0.- 201.12
/ INVERT C.B.
- 200.43 /
EL -200.1
EL 20 LE-
xEL =199.6 \ \ /
EL= 199.9 I /
2p J xEL 200.9 0.EL =20t.7
Q Ot.t 201.22
19
Figure 7
BISCAYNE BOULEVARD - DEVILLE
DRIVE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT
7 INVERT C.B.
x -20 .4 4EL =201.51 I
/ TBM TNH #201
EL 204.04
EL -199.7
-200.0 xEL =202.7
EL_ 199.50
® INVERT C.B.
I
199.50,
INVERT C.B.
EL =19375
EL -194.7
SIN HOL� /
ELT199 ./1 1
L =199.9
1.9
EL- 200"2
xEL -203.4
I
C
I
E1 =200.0 20
0
K EL =199.8
x .0
L= 199.
L =199.8
cb1
I
"
I
_ =200.3
' xEL =202.7
I
i
I 1
oo/
n
`
=200.3
I
EL =200.4
EL-200.2
xEL =200.0
x
L =200.7
..F1 =7n? I
19
Figure 7
BISCAYNE BOULEVARD - DEVILLE
DRIVE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENT
The city completed a field survey of the park indicating that the overflow from the street low -point
into the park is 0.3 feet above the low structure at 4501 Parkside. It is recommended that the
existing curb be lowered in this area to provide a more defined and accessible point where water
can flow from the street to the park. Consideration should also be given to this concept at the low -
point along Rutledge Avenue. With the future pathway to be constructed along the park,
providing a handicap access point to the trail at this point would provide the overflow. The city
should also work with the various review agencies in developing a plan for maintaining the outlet
swale from the storm sewer to Minnehaha Creek.
2.8 Woodcrest Drive Area along Minnehaha Creek
The homes along Minnehaha Creek in the Woodcrest Drive area have historically been affected by
flooding conditions of Minnehaha Creek. The structures were built prior to the development and
enactment of floodplain regulations. A comparison of the 100 -year frequency flood elevation, as
shown on the city's Flood Insurance Study, with the elevation of structures field - surveyed by the
city shows that the lowest structures in this area, are more than 3 feet below the flood elevation of
the creek. There are approximately 33 homes in this area that are below the 100 -year frequency
flood elevation.
The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District regulates the flow rate leaving lake Minnetonka on a
daily basis. During July, 1997 the District limited the outflow from the lake to a minimum at the
request of the city. The flow from Lake Minnetonka is a portion of the creek conditions at flood
stage, however, the runoff from the local drainage area downstream of the lake is the primary
component of the creek flow at flood stage. The development of additional flood storage in the
Pamela Park area has recently been discussed by the city. The creation/development of the flood
storage for the creek that would be available in the area would not alleviate the current flood
problems. It would, however, be an improvement.
The options that are available to alleviate the flood damage potential in this area are limited.
Each individual lot and structure, below flood stage, needs to have a plan developed. In certain
instances, flood protection may be applicable by either constructing berms or raising low
entryways. In some cases, flood protection may not provide a "level of protection" for the 100 -year
event, but provide protection greater than currently exists. In some cases, structural options may
not provide sufficient benefit and the purchase of flood insurance may be the only option available.
2327354 \55641 -1/YMH 21
It is recommended that flood protection plans be developed for each individual structure that is
currently below the 100 -year frequency flood elevation of Minnehaha Creek in this area. An
estimated cost of preparing a flood protection plan is $3,000 for each individual structure or a total
estimated cost of $100,000. This cost does not include final design and completion of possible
improvements.
2.9 Other Study Areas
The city has been contacted regarding back -yard inundation in the area of West 63rd Street and
Ashcroft Lane — immediately north of the Crosstown. There were not apparent problems with
surface water in this area in July, 1997, however we will work with the city in reviewing the
drainage characteristics in this area.
The city has also been contacted regarding street inundation during high intense rainstorm events
along Edina Boulevard between Country Club Road and Bridge Road. We will again be working
with the city to determine if improvements are recommended to more efficiently improve the
conveyance of drainage in this area.
The city is also required by the requirement of the Metropolitan Surface Water Planning Rules,
Chapter 8410, to prepare a local water management plan to address water quantity and quality
issues. The city's comprehensive plan will address many of these and other issues.
2327354 \55641 -1/YMH 22
EVALUATION OF THE CITY'S
SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM
w91NA
0
1888
DO
DO NOT REMOVE
FROM
C
pUNCIL CHAMBERS
December 8, 1997
Comm. No. 11413
TKDA
TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON
AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS
1500 PIPER JAFFRAY PLAZA
444 CEDAR STREET
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 -2140
PHONE:612/292 -4400 FAX:612/292 -0083
TKDA
ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS
December 9, 1997
Mr. Francis Hoffman, P.E.
Director of Public Works
City Engineer
City of Edina
4801 West 50`h Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424 -1394
Re: Evaluation of the City's Sanitary Sewer System
City of Edina, Minnesota
Commission No. 11413 -01
Dear Mr. Hoffman:
TOLTZ. KING, DUVALL. ANDERSON
AND ASSOCIATES. INCORPORATED
1500 PIPER JAFFRAV PLAZA
444 CEDAR STREET
SAINT PAUL. MINNESOTA 55101.2140
PHONE:612/292.4400 FAX:612/292 -0083
We are pleased to submit herewith this copy of a report on "Evaluation of the City's Sanitary
Sewer System" for the City of Edina. This report was authorized under a contract between
TKDA and the City dated August 21, 1997.
We have developed this report in response to the City's request to evaluate the operation of the
City's sanitary sewer system during a series of rainstorms that occurred in July and August of
this year. Of particular interest was the rainstorm on July 22 which caused several sewer
backups in the system. The objective of this report was to answer the following questions in
regard to this event:
• Why did this happen?
• What caused the problems?
• What measures can be taken by homeowners to help prevent these problems in the future?
• What measures can be taken by the City to help prevent these problems in the future?
The primary conclusion of this study is that the contribution of clear water into the sanitary sewer
system as inflow is the primary reason for the excessively high peak flow that occurred during
the July 22 storm. The inflow quantity is estimated to be 8,635 gpm or 59 percent of the total
peak flow of 14,590 gpm generated within the City during this storm.
An Equal Opportunity Employer
Mr. Francis Hoffman
December 8, 1997
Page 2
The report suggests recommendations for an inflow reduction program along with some specific
system improvements for your consideration.
We have appreciated the opportunity to work with you and your staff on this project. We are
available to discuss the report and its findings with your City Council.
Sincerely,
David W. Kirkwold, P.E.
DWK/cjy
Enclosure
Acknowledgment
We wish to thank the City of Edina's Department of Public Works for their assistance in gathering
background data, for providing information and field observations of the July storm, and for their
professional assistance in commenting and reviewing the report contents. In particular we would
thank Fran Hoffman, Director and City Engineer; Wayne Houle, Assistant City Engineer; Dick
Pelinka, Utilities Superintendent, and Jerry Hershey, Utility Foreman, for their participation in
developing this study and its recommendations.
In addition, we wish to acknowledge the contribution of Dan Dorval of TKDA for coordinating the field
surveys and participation in this report preparation.
Certification
I hereby certify that this Report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a
duly registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
David W. Kirkwold, P.E.
Registration No. 7834
TKDA TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON
AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
ENGINEERS *ARCHITECTS* PLANNERS 1500 PIPER JAFFRAY PLAZA
444 CEDAR STREET
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 -2140
PHONE:612/292 -4400 FAX:612/292 -0083
CITY OF EDINA
EVALUATION OF SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM
TABLE OF CONTENTS
i
Page
I. Executive Summary
1
II Introduction
4
A. Purpose
4
B. Scope
4
C. Definitions
5
III. Description of Existing Sanitary Sewer System
7
A. General Description
7
B. Referenced Reports:
10
1. Donohue I & I Report
10
2. CH2M -Hill I & I Report
10
IV. Summary of July, 1997 Storm Events
11
A. Weather
11
B. Definition of Sanitary Problem Areas
11
V. Existing System Evaluation
13
A. General
13
B. Base Flow
14
C. Infiltration
17
D. Inflow
18
E. Storm Event Total Wastewater Flows
27
F. Hydraulic Analysis of the Existing Sanitary Sewers
32
G. TV Survey
44
H. House Survey
47
I. Manhole Survey
52
i
Page
VI. Analysis of Wet Weather Problem Areas
60
A.
Tower/Woodcrest Area
60
B.
St. Johns /Ashcroft Area
64
C.
Limerick Area
68
VII. Potential Problem Area Solutions
72
A.
Measures to Attenuate Peak Flows
72
B.
Measures to Increase Conveyance Capacity
74
VIII. Summary and Recommendations
75
A.
Inflow Reduction Program
75
B.
Adopt a Program of Regular Cleaning of City's
Trunk Sewers
77
C.
Construct the Tower/Woodcrest Relief Sewer
77
D
Construct Peak Flow Storage Tank
78
E.
Modification of the St. Johns /Ashcroft Sewer
78
F.
Divert Fairview Southdale Hospital from Area A to
Basin 3 and the MCES 1 RF -490 Sewer.
78
Appendices
Appendix A
A.1
Proposed Storage Tank Location
A.2
Proposed Sanitary Sewer Diversion From Basin 5 to
Basin 3
A.3
Proposed Diversion of Fairview Hospital Flow to Basin
3
A.4
Proposed Addition of 12 Inch Sewer for Basin 6
A.5
Proposed Modification of Trunk Sewer in Basin 10
Appendix B
B.1
House Survey Questionnaire
Appendix C
C.1
Edina Sanitary Sewer Map
ii
Figures
Page
Figure III -1
Boundary Map For Sewage Basin Designation
8
Figure V -1
Typical Sanitary Sewer House Service Connections
15
Figure V -2
Flow Rate at Meter 127 on July 1 and 2, 1997
19
Figure V -3
Flow Rate at Meter 129 on July 1, 1997
20
Figure V -4
Lift Station No. 14 Pumping Rate on July 1, 1997
21
Figure V -5
Flow Rate at Meter 127 on August 27, 1997
22
Figure V -6
Flow Rate at Meter 129 on August 27, 1997
23
Figure V -7
Lift Station No. 14 Pumping Rate on August 28, 1997
24
Figure V -8
Flow Rate at Meter 129 on July 22, 1997
25
Figure V -9
Lift Station No. 14 Pumping Rate on July 22, 1997
26
Figure V -10
Flow Rate at Meter 130 on July 22, 1997
28
Figure V -11
Flow Rate at Meter 127 on August 19, 1997
29
Figure V -12
Flow Rate at Meter 129 on August 19, 1997
30
Figure V -13
Lift Station No. 14 Pumping Rate on August 19, 1997
31
Figure V -14
Area A - Sanitary Sewer System Average Wet
Weather Flow Conditions - No Rain
34
Figure V -15
Area B - Sanitary Sewer System Average Wet
Weather Conditions - No Rain
35
Figure V -16
Area C - Sanitary Sewer System Average Wet
Weather Conditions - No Rail
36
Figure V -17
Area A - Sanitary Sewer System Peak Inflow
Conditions - July 22, 1997
37
Figure V -18
Area B - Sanitary Sewer System Peak Inflow
Conditions - July 22, 1997
38
iii
Page
Figure V -19 Area C - Sanitary Sewer System Peak Inflow
Conditions - July 22, 1997 39
Figure V -20 Sanitary Sewer Profile From Tower Street
to Meter Station 41
Figure V -21 St. Johns /Ashcroft Sanitary Sewer Profile
(Main Trunk) 43
Figure VI -1 Flow Rate at Meter 127 on August 14 -17, 1997 63
iv
Tables
Page
Table V -1
Sanitary Sewer Flow Data Summary
16
Table V -2
Flow Summary for July 1 and July 22
32
Table V -3
Sanitary Sewer Home Survey Results
49
Table V -4
TowerMoodcrest Summary of Manhole Survey
54
Table V -5
Basin 18 Summary of Manhole Survey
55
v
I. Executive Summary
This study has been conducted to determine the reasons for sanitary sewer
backups and surcharging that occurred in the City of Edina as a result of a heavy
rainstorm on July 22, 1997. Rainfall amounts during most of July were
significantly above normal and contributed to the problem in that the ground was
saturated with water before the July 22 storm.
The configuration of the City's sanitary sewer system can be divided into three
primary service areas. These have been identified as Area A, B, and C. Area A
provides service to the northeast area of the City. Area B provides service
across the middle of the City in a northwest to southeast general arrangement.
Area C services the southwest area of the City.
Most of the complaints of sewer backups can be included in three specific
neighborhoods in the City. These specific areas were studied in more detail and
are identified as follows:
• Tower/Woodcrest, Area A, Basin 6
• St. Johns /Ashcroft, Area B, Basin 10
• Limerick, Area C, Basin 18
The following background information was determined to be necessary to
evaluate the sanitary sewer system and the problems associated with the July 22
rain:
• Peak Wastewater Flows. Peak wastewater flowrates were estimated for
each of three primary service areas.
• Estimate of Wastewater Sources. An estimate was developed of the
breakdown of the peak flow for each primary area between base flow,
infiltration and inflow.
These analyses resulted in the following estimate of the component flow sources
and the resultant total flow for July 22.
Flow Component Area A
Base Flow 625 gpm
Infiltration 1,070 gpm
Inflow 3,395 gpm
Maximum Flow 5,090 gpm
Area B
Area C
Total
840 gpm
1,140 gpm
2,605 gpm
1,220 gpm
1,060 gpm
3,350 gpm
3.140 apm
2,100 gpm
8,635 gpm
5,200 gpm
4,300 gpm
14,590 gpm
The peak flow generated from the City during this rainstorm was 14,590 gpm
(21.0 MGD) which compares to the average flow for the year of 7.5 MGD.
1 11413
Specific field surveys were conducted to gather information on the possible
sources of clear water that finds its way into the sanitary sewers during heavy
rains. The surveys included a house sump pump survey of 500 homes, a
manhole survey of 456 manholes, and a TV survey of 33,207 feet of sanitary
sewer. The results of these surveys would indicate the following:
• Approximately seven percent of the homes surveyed had sump pumps
connected to the sanitary sewer. The number City wide is expected to be
four percent.
• Approximately 85 percent of the manholes in the City have pickholes. This
was common construction practice during the time when Edina's sewers were
installed. The potential inflow from manhole covers that are not sealed can
be significant for very intense rainfall.
• The TV survey of the sewers included in the survey indicated the sewers
were generally in good condition. The survey did indicate likely joint leakage
during wet periods by the presence of deposits at the sewer joints. The
observation of debris and partial obstructions is a reason to recommend a
trunk line televising and cleaning program.
Excessive inflow of clear water into the sanitary sewer system is the most
significant reason for the problems experienced during the July 22 storm. The
analysis of other periods of rain would indicate very intense rain, in the category
of a 100 year storm, is necessary before inflow becomes a significant portion of
the sanitary wastewater flow. The projected inflow quantity for the entire City is
estimated to be 8,635 gpm which is 59 percent of the peak flow of 14,590 gpm.
In addition to excessive inflow, the other reasons for problems in the specific
problem areas are listed as follows:
Tower/Woodcrest
• A partial blockage in the downstream sewer.
• A limitation in sewer conveyance capacity.
• Basement elevations are close to top of sewer.
St. Johns /Ashcroft
• Basement elevations are close to top of sewer.
• A limitation in sewer conveyance capacity.
Limerick
• None.
2 11413
Estimated Costs
The estimated costs of the recommendations presented in this report are
considered preliminary and need to be verified by feasibility reports.
Recommendations
The following are recommendations that have been developed in this report:
1. Develop an aggressive inflow reduction program. This program should
include the following:
• Public Education Program.
• Establish an Inflow Reduction Goal - Suggest 40 percent reduction
in three years.
• Implement a program to eliminate basement sump pumps
connected to the sanitary sewer system. City wide survey cost
$400,000.
• Develop a plan to replace manhole covers and seal manhole tops.
Estimated, Cost - $500,000.
• Selectively replace older brick manholes susceptible to flooding.
Estimated Cost - $100,000.
2. Add a plugging, televising, and cleaning program for large trunk sewers to
the existing cleaning program.
3. Construct a relief sewer for the Tower/Woodcrest Area from St. Johns
Avenue and Tower Street to the Minnehaha trunk. Estimated Cost -
$400,000.
4. Construct a storage tank to shave peak flow rates for the Minnehaha
trunk sewer near West 58`h Street and Halifax. Estimated Cost -
$500,000.
5. Construct a relief sewer for the St. Johns /Ashcroft Area from the
Crosstown frontage road and Ashcroft Lane to St. Johns Avenue and
Garrison Lane. Estimated Cost - $250,000.
6. Evaluate alternatives for increasing the conveyance capacity from the City
by directing flow from Area A and /or Area B to the MCES Interceptor
1 RF -490 in Richfield. Range of Estimated Cost - $150,000 to $900,000.
3 11413
II. Introduction
A. Purpose
The City of Edina has experienced a period of rainfall that has been
significantly above normal. The rainfall amount for a 28 day period
from June 28 through July 25 averaged about 16 inches over the City.
Heavy rainstorms occurred throughout this period and climaxed with a
very heavy rain on July 21 -22 which caused some conveyance
problems with the sanitary sewer system. Because of these problems,
the City has authorized this study to evaluate the existing sanitary
sewer system. The problems encountered included sanitary sewer
surcharging and some basement back -ups of sanitary wastewater.
The purpose of this report is to evaluate various aspects of the existing
sanitary sewer system to determine the causes, if possible, of the
problems that occurred on July 22, 1997. This evaluation includes a
determination of the adequacy of the existing system to convey the
quantities of wastewater generated during this storm. Finally, having
evaluated the causes and evaluated the system adequacy, develop
recommendations to mitigate the system problems.
B. Scope
The scope of this study includes the following activities:
1. Examine the sanitary sewer flow metering records to determine the
wastewater flow generated during the July 22 storm.
2. Determine the sources and the quantity of wastewater flow
attributed to base sanitary wastewater, infiltration, and inflow.
3. Study in more detail the three specified problem areas which have
been designated as:
a) Tower/Woodcrest
b) St. Johns /Ashcroft
c) Limerick
4. Conduct a field survey of 500 selected residences to determine the
approximate number of homes that have sump pumps connected
to the sanitary sewer.
5. Conduct a field survey of manholes in the problem areas to
determine an estimate of the contribution of clear water inflow.
4 11413
6. Observe the records for the TV survey of selected sanitary sewers
to determine the general condition of these sewers. About six
miles of sanitary sewer were televised by Pipe Services
Corporation for this report.
7. Develop an explanation of what happened on July 22.
8. Evaluate options for sanitary sewer system improvements.
9. Develop recommendations for a program to mitigate the sanitary
sewer problems that occurred on July 22.
C. Definitions
Certain words and phrases are used throughout this report.
Definitions of these words and phrases are included here for better
understanding.
Average Wet Weather Flow - Average wet weather flow is the
summation of Base Flow and the estimated Wet Weather
Infiltration. This average wet weather flow does not include any
inflow, consequently, it is wet weather flow during a day without
rain.
Base Flow - The base flow is an estimate of the average sanitary
wastewater generated from the residents, commercial
establishments, institutions, and any industrial facilities.
Hydraulic Profile - A hydraulic profile is a plot of elevations that
indicate the expected water surface elevations and generally
include the actual elevations of the conveying sewer.
Hydrograph - The actual plot of flow rate and time for a particular
event.
Ideal Flow - Gravity flow condition used to establish the rated flow
capacity of a pipe.
Infiltration - Infiltration is leakage into the underground portions of the
sewers and manholes of the sewer system. Dry weather infiltration
is clear water leakage into the sewers during a selected dry
weather period. Wet weather infiltration is clear water leakage
during wet weather periods and during a selected period of no rain.
Inflow - Inflow is leakage into the sewer system that is considered a
direct connection.
5 11413
I and I - Infiltration and Inflow
Meter M -127 - Sanitary wastewater flowmeter located at West 54`h
Street and Xerxes Avenue that measures the total flow discharge
from Area A.
Meter M -129 - Sanitary wastewater flowmeter located at West 75`h
Street and Xerxes Avenue that measures the total flow discharges
from both Area B and C.
Peak Flow - Highest estimated flow condition that combines average
wet weather flow and peak inflow. For this report it is the peak flow
for July 22, 1997.
Peak Inflow - Highest estimated inflow rate during heavy rain. For this
report it is the peak inflow for July 22, 1997.
PS 14 Meter - Sanitary wastewater flowmeter located at Pump Station
14 at West 72 "d Street and Oaklawn Avenue that measures the
total flow discharged from Area C.
Rated Sewer Capacity - The estimated flow conveyance capacity of a
sewer flowing full at the installed grade or slope (no surcharge).
Sanitary Sewer - A sewer designed to convey only wastewater or
sewage.
Submergence - Underwater.
Surcharge - An elevation higher than the top of a sewer and
represents flow pressure as compared to the normal design of
gravity flow. In a sanitary sewer system a surcharge can be field
measured by the elevation at the sewer manholes. A surcharge is
what causes a sewer system to back -up into basements.
6 11413
III. Description of Existing Sanitary Sewer System
A. General Description
The Edina sanitary sewer system consists of about 180 miles of sewer
piping, approximately 4,800 manholes, and 22 lift stations. There are
two main trunk sewers carrying flow out of the City. The northern
section of the City is served by a 24 inch diameter sewer that moves
flow into Minneapolis and connects to the MCES interceptor 1 MN -345.
The southern section of the City is served by a 33 inch diameter sewer
that joins into the MCES interceptor 1 RF -491 in Richfield. The flow
from both of these trunk sewers is transported to the wastewater
treatment plant at Pig's Eye in St. Paul.
The majority of the system was constructed in the 1940's and 50's, but
a portion of the northeast section was built in the 1920's. The system
has not changed much in the past couple decades except for
rehabilitation of existing sewers. The majority of pipe in the system is
vitrified clay, but reinforced concrete, plastic, and ductile iron have also
been used. Most of the collection piping is 9 inch diameter with some
8 inch or 10 inch and the main trunk sewers range from 12 inch
diameter to 33 inches.
The City has implemented a standard jet cleaning program where all of
the collection piping in the system is cleaned on a five year revolving
schedule. The main trunk sewers are not included in the cleaning
program. The City relies on the design velocity of the system to flush
the main lines and keep them clean. Televised surveys of the system
are also used to help determine areas requiring maintenance.
The Edina sanitary system can be broken down into three primary
drainage areas as shown on Figure III -1. For the purpose of this
report we have designated these areas as Areas A, B, and C. Each
area is further broken down into basins showing the drainage
boundaries for the main feeder sewers. The designation of 21 basins
and their boundaries was determined in the 1983 Infiltration and Inflow
Report by Donohue. These basins are also shown on Figure III -1 and
in more detail on a large City Sewer Map reproduced in this report for
reference. This sewer map shows Basins 1, 2, and 3 are all relatively
small basins that do not receive flow from any other basins and have
outlets directly out of Edina. These basins are not included in any of
the main sewer divisions in the City and are not included in further
discussion of the Edina system. The following is a description of the
sewer system based on the primary area designations.
7 11413
LEI
& IQ
kp
1. Area A:
This drainage area includes service to the northeast third of the
City. It includes Basins 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8. The main trunk sewer for
this section is the 24 inch diameter clay pipe that follows
Minnehaha Creek from Woodland Circle to Xerxes Avenue. There
are four main feeder pipes that join to form the trunk sewer.
a. The main feeder serves the northern part of Area A. It starts as
a 12 inch diameter pipe at Brookside Avenue and West 44th
Street. This feeder gradually increases in size and eventually
increases to 24 inch diameter at Wooddale Avenue. The 24
inch line winds along Minnehaha Creek to the south before
joining the other collection sewers.
b. The middle of Area A is served by a 12 inch diameter collection
sewer that starts near Highway 100 and Windsor Avenue. This
feeder winds through the Tower Street/Woodland Road area
before joining the 24 inch trunk sewer near Woodland Circle.
c. The southwest collection sewer starts as a 10 inch diameter
pipe and eventually increases to a 21 inch sewer before joining
the 24 inch trunk sewer near Woodland Circle.
d. The southeast feeder is a 10 inch diameter sewer that services
a relatively small area of homes before entering the southwest
collection pipe at West 58th Street.
2. Area B:
Area B includes Basins 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13. There is one primary
collection sewer servicing all of Area B. This line starts as a 10
inch diameter sewer near Interlachen Boulevard and winds
diagonally through the center of Edina from the northwest to the
southeast. The collection sewer gradually increases in size up to
24 inch before joining the 33 inch main trunk sewer at France
Avenue just south of Hazelton Road. Fairview Hospital, Southdale
Center, and miscellaneous other industries contribute to this
system.
3. Area C:
Area C includes Basins 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, and 21. It has
two primary feeders that combine near Highway 100 and Hibiscus
Avenue to form the 24 inch trunk sewer serving the southwest third
9 11413
of the City. The northern feeder starts as a 12 inch pipe near
Highway 169 and Lincoln Drive. The majority of this feeder follows
Nine Mile Creek gradually increasing in size to 21 inch diameter
reinforced concrete pipe.
The southern feeder starts at Highway 169 and Sioux Trail as a 12
inch diameter line. It winds through the southwest corner of the
City picking up three 12 inch diameter sub - feeders before joining
the 24 inch trunk sewer. The 24 inch trunk sewer feeds Lift Station
14 which is the main lift station in Edina. Lift Station 14 pumps all
the flow generated in Area C.
B. Referenced Reports
1. Infiltration /Inflow Analysis report prepared by Donohue and
Associates in January 1983.
This study evaluated the infiltration and inflow of the City of Edina's
sanitary sewer system. The quantities of I and I were determined
by examining sewer metered flow, water sales and temporary field
metering of the service area basins. The background information
has been utilized to help determine the current situation for I and I
in the system. The field metering data of each basin was valuable
in determining estimates of the quantity of I and I expected in each
basin. The overall dry weather infiltration rate, determined by this
report, was 1,932 gpm. The report did estimate there was a
potential for system wide inflow rates of as high as 14,682 gpm for
very high intensity rainstorms.
2. Systemwide Infiltration and Inflow Evaluation report by CH2 M Hill in
April 1992.
This study evaluated the entire MCES system and estimated
quantities of I and I for each community served by the system.
This report consequently provides a comparison of the estimated
infiltration rate and rain dependent infiltration and inflow by
community.
This report indicates the estimated dry weather infiltration rate for
Edina was 1,615 gpm and the City was number 6 on the list of 105
communities for high infiltration rates. The rain dependent
infiltration and inflow rate that was determined would indicate the
impact of rainfall on the I and I rate. This study indicates a rainfall
dependent I and I rate of 2,325 gpm, for Edina.
10 11413
IV. Summary of July, 1997 Storm Events
A. Weather
This study of the sanitary sewer system is being conducted because of
heavy rain events that occurred this summer. These rain events
caused sanitary sewer backups within the City of Edina. As part of the
overall study, the City retained Mr. William Enderson, local
meteorologist, to prepare a report on the rain events in Edina. This
report is titled "Heavy Rain Events in Edina, Minnesota in 1997" and is
dated December 10, 1997.
This report of these rain events is referred to. for background
information on the amounts and intensity of the significant rain events.
Total rainfall ranged from 14 to 17 inches over the City of Edina from
June 28 through July 25. The particular storm that caused the sewer
surcharging and sewer backups was the July 21 -22 storm. Rainfall of
about 12 inches had preceded this rain event and had caused the area
soils to be saturated.
B. Definition of Sanitary Sewer Problem Areas.
The City of Edina received numerous complaints from residents
concerning water damage in basements during the July 22, 1997
storm event. The map with plotted locations of complaints showed
three areas had a concentration of residents experiencing water
problems. A concentration of problems indicates a surcharge in the
conveyance system causing problems for more than one resident
along that section of sewer. Complaints from other areas of the City
were generally isolated cases for which no specific evaluation of the
problem was included in this study..
The three areas concentrated on for this study included:
1. Tower/Woodcrest Area - This area is located in the northeast
quadrant of the City and includes a relatively large number of
homes. Approximately 48 complaints were received from this
general area during or just after the July 22 storm. Included in this
section are Tower Street, Wooddale Avenue, Woodland Road,
Woodcrest Drive, and a small section of West 56th Street. This
area is located in Basin 6.
The main sewer serving this area is a 12 inch diameter clay pipe
that receives flow from all of Basin 6 and a small portion
(approximately 1/4) of Basin 4 before entering the main 24 inch
diameter trunk sewer near Woodland Circle. The 24 inch trunk
11 11413
sewer continues to Meter 127 and discharges into the Minneapolis
sanitary system.
2. St. Johns /Ashcroft Area - This area is located in the eastern
middle of the City just north of Highway 62 and includes a relatively
small number of homes. Approximately 11 complaints were
received from this general area during or just after the July 22
storm. Included in this section are Ashcroft Lane, two blocks of St.
Johns Avenue, and Garrison Lane. This area is located in Basin
10.
The main sewer serving this area is an 18 inch diameter clay pipe
that receives flow from all of Basins 10, 11, 12 and 13 before
entering the main 24 inch diameter trunk sewer near Brookview
Avenue. The 24 inch trunk sewer continues to Meter 129 and
discharges into the Richfield sanitary system.
3. Limerick Area - This area is located in the southwestern quadrant
of the City and includes an isolated section of homes.
Approximately 8 complaints were received in sporadic locations
throughout the subdivision. Included in this section are Valley
Lane, Creek Drive, Limerick Lane, Limerick Drive, Doron Lane and
Doron Drive. This area is located in Basin 18.
The main sewer serving this area is a 9 inch diameter clay pipe that
receives flow only from the Limerick division of homes before
entering the main 12 inch diameter sewer draining the rest of Basin
18. The 12 inch sewer connects to the 18 inch trunk sewer at
Valley View Road. The 18 inch trunk sewer continues to Meter 129
and discharges into the Richfield sanitary system.
12 11413
V. Existing System Evaluation
A. General
The analysis of the wastewater flows in the existing sanitary sewer
system requires a determination be made of the contributing elements.
The components of the total sanitary wastewater flow are commonly
divided into the Base Flow, Infiltration and Inflow. These components
are defined as follows:
Base Flow- The base flow is the component of the total wastewater
flow generated from residences, commercial buildings, any industries,
public buildings, and other institutions. The base flow represents all
the wastewater, generated in the community.
Infiltration - Infiltration is considered clear water which leaks or seeps
into the house service connections, main collection sewers, manholes
and foundation drains. The clear water is groundwater which finds its
way into the sewer collection system through leaky pipe joints,
manhole structures, or defective pipes.
Inflow - Inflow is considered clear water which finds its way into the
sewer system in a more direct manner. Sources of inflow could
include, but not be limited to, any storm drain direct connection, roof
leaders, basement drains, basement sump pumps, and manhole
K•PrII&I
The terms infiltration and inflow, as described above, are quantities of
clear water that get into the sewer system and which, if significant, can
cause conveyance problems. A primary objective of this study is to
identify and estimate the quantities of each of these components. The
possible sources of infiltration and inflow are identified as follows:
INFILTRATION
• Sewer main joints, cracks and broken pipe.
• House service connection joints, cracks and broken pipe.
• Manhole structures and manhole pipe penetrations.
INFLOW
• Manhole cover leakage.
• Manhole to frame leakage.
• Sump pump connected to sanitary sewer.
• Foundation drain tile connected to sanitary sewer.
13 11413
• Roof drain connected to sanitary sewer.
• Direct connection of storm drainage system to sanitary
sewer.
Figure V -1 shows a typical city block with a sanitary sewer in the street
and the house service connections. The reason for including this
drawing is to illustrate that the length of the house service connections
on private property is significant. This would indicate that the house
service connections could be as much as 150 miles of pipe for the City
of Edina. The point to be made is all of the underground sanitary
sewer pipe, both private and public, can provide locations for
infiltration of clear water into the sewer system.
This chapter will include estimates of the total wastewater flow and a
hydraulic analysis of the sewer system during the July storm events.
Also included is a discussion of the results of the field surveys that
were conducted to provide evidence of the physical conditions of the
existing sewer system.
B. Base Flow
Base flow is normally determined by considering all of the water sold
by the City would find its way into the sewer system as wastewater.
The base flow for each of the sewer basins was determined in the
1983 1 & I report. After review, it was determined the base flows
established by that report would be representative for the current
analysis. The basis for this conclusion is the Annual Average Daily
Flows for Edina have not shown an appreciable change over the
recent years as shown on the following tabulation:
Year Annual Average Daily Flow
1979
7.28 MGD
1993
7.47 MGD
1994
6.87 MGD
1995
7.01 MGD
1996
6.64 MGD
The base flows assigned to each of the 21 sewer basins are tabulated
on Table V -1.
14 11413
Vn
_�
n
D
r
N
D
Z
D
m
O
c
N
m
m
n
m
n rn
O
Z
Z
rn
n
9 <
O
Z
N
SEWER
COLLECTOR
�'��HOUSE::•:•
T IV TIT •�H0��5��• "�'�HOUSE�'� TJITJE� ::::4::::
c
M
HOUSE SERVICE
CON ECTION
CAL)
SEWER COLLECTOR LENGTH BETWEEN MANHOLES = -650'
MH
HOUSE SEVICE CONNECTION TOTAL LENGTH (-62'x 20 houses)= 1240'
Table V -1. Sanitary Sewer Flow Data Summary
SANITAR
SEWER
BASIN'
RECEIVING
BASIN
OUTLET LOCATION
PIPE
TYPE
PIPE
DIAM IN
PIPE
GRADE
%
PIPE
CAP.
C.F.S.
DESIGN
BASE
FLOW'
MAX.
INFILTRATION
RATE
WET WEATHER
DESIGN
BASE FLOW'
TOTAL
BASIN
FLOW
WET WEATHER
FLOW - PERCENT
OF PIPE CAP.
MAX.
HOUR
INFLOW
PEAK
DESIGN
FLOW °
TOTAL
BASIN
FLOW
PERCENT OF
PIPE CAP.
NO SURCHARGE
REMARKS
1
MINNEAPOLIS
42ND ST & FRANCE AVE
PIPE
PIPE
GRADE
_
0.104
0.067
0.171
0.171
PIPE
0.900
1.071
1.071
PIPE
2
3
4
MINNEAPOLIS
MINNEAPOLIS
MINNEAPOLIS
50TH ST & FRANCE AVE
XERXES AVE SOUTH OF 64TH ST
XERXES AVE @ 54TH ST
VCP
DIP
VCP
10
12
24
0.18
0.40
0.16
1.10
2.44
10.69
0.192
0.268
0.278
0.163
0.025
0.710
0.355
0.293
0.988
0.355
0.293
3.753
32.27
12.01
35.11
1.134
0.403
1.862
1.489
0.696
2.850
1.489
0.696
11.329
135.36
28.52
105.98
REMARKS
5
6
4
4
BROOKVIEW AVE @ 58TH ST
WOODLAND RD EAST OF WOODDALE AVE
VCP
VCP
18
12
0.12
0.25
4.30
2.11
0.169
0.271
0.407
0.716
0.576
0.987
0.576
0.987
13.40
46.78
0.574
2.567
1.150
3.554
1.150
3.554
26.74
168.44
CONCENTRATED COMPLAINT AREA
7
8
4
7
MINNEHAHA CREEK NORTHEAST OF WOODDALE GL
WOODHILL WAY WEST OF RIDGE PLACE
VCP
VCP
24
15
0.16
0.25
10.69
3.82
0.395
0.283
0.288
0.236
0.683
0.519
1.202
0.519
11.24
13.59
1.829
0.744
2.512
1.263
3.775
1.263
35.31
33.06
9
RICHFIELD
XERXES AVE @ YORK TERRACE
RCP
33
0.10
18.12
0.681
0.961
1.642
9.474
52.28
2.103
3.745
21.146
116.70
10
11
9
10
66TH ST @ FRANCE AVE
HWY 62 EAST OF HWY 100
RCP
RCP
24
18
0.12
0.16
8.49
4.55
0.481
0.166
-0:970
0.147
1.451
0.313
2.933
1.482
34.55
32.57
1.192
1.169
2.643
1.482
7.826
5.183
92.18
113.91
CONCENTRATED COMPLAINT AREA
12
13
11
12
LIFT STATION @ GROVE ST
INTERLACHEN BLVD WEST OF BYWOOD WEST
RCP
VCP
15
10
0.2
0.90
3.13
2.46
1 0.325
0.217
0.293
0.334
0.618
0.551
1.169
0.551
37.35
22.40
0.922
1.610
1.540
2.161
3.701
2.161
118.24
87.85
14
9
LIFT STATION @ CLAREMORE ROAD
RCP
24
0.08
6.93
0.720
0.450
1.170
4.899
70.69
1.385
2.555
9.575
138.17
15
14
74TH ST WEST ® OHMS LANE
RCP
21
0.10
5.43
0.302
0.208
0.510
1.148
21.14
0.487
0.997
1.930
35.54
16
15
GLEASON RD NORTH OF DEWEY HILL RD
RCP
15
0.16
2.80
0.266
0.372
0.638
0.638
22.79
0.295
0.933
0.933
33.32
17
14
METRO BLVD WEST OF HWY 100
RCP
24
0.12
8.49
0.337
0.379
0.716
2.581
30.40
0.854
1.570
5.090
59.95
18
17
VALLEY VIEW RD @ TRACY AVE
RCP
12
0.20
1.73
0.201
0.228
0.429
0.429
24.80
0.129
0.558
0.558
52.25
CONCENTRATED COMPLAINT AREA
19
20
17
19
CREEK VALLEY RD WEST OF VALLEY VIEW RD
BETWEEN GLEASON RD & HWY 62
RCP
CIP
15
15
0.20
0.20
3.13
3.13
0.099
0.303
0.316
0.274
0.415
0.577
1.436
1.021
45.88
32.62
0.381
0.786
0.796
1.363
2.962
2.166
94.63
69.20
21
20
LINCOLN DR @ DOVRE DR
RCP
12
0.24
1.89
0.310
0.134
0.444
0.444
23.49
0.359
0.803
0.803
42.49
TOTALS CFS
TOTALS (MGD )
1
6.368
4.114
14.046
9.074
21.685
14.009
35.731
23.082
REFER TO BASIN MAP IN FIGURE III -1.
` VALUES FROM TABLE 6.5 IN 1981 1 &1 STUDY FROM DONOHUE (FLOWS ARE IN CFS)
INCLUDES BASE FLOW AND INFILTRATION UNDER WET WEATHER CONDITIONS (CFS)
INCLUDES WET WEATHER FLOW AND MAXIMUM HOURLY INFLOW (CFS)
CONTINUATION OF BASIN 4 OUTLET INTO MINNEAPOLIS SYSTEM
SANITARY
PIPE
PIPE
DESIGN
MAX.
WET WEATHER
TOTAL
PERCENT
MAX.
PEAK
TOTAL
PERCENT
SEWER
RECEIVING
PIPE
PIPE
GRADE
CAP.
BASE
INFILTRATION
DESIGN
BASIN
PIPE
HOUR
DESIGN
BASIN
PIPE
SEGMENT
BASIN
OUTLET LOCATION
TYPE
DIAM IN
%
C.F.S.
FLOWZ
RATE
BASE FLOW'
FLOW
CAP.
INFLOW
FLOW°
FLOW
CAP.
REMARKS
1'
MINNEAPOLIS
UPTON AVE @ FOREST DALE ROAD
VCP
24
0.13
9.64
1 0.013
0.028
0.041
3.794
39.36
0.087
0.128
11.457
1 '18.85
2°
MINNEAPOLIS
JW. 53RD ST. @ NEWTON AVE
VCP
27
0.13
13.20
1 0.332
0.711
1.043
4.837
36.64
2.171
3.214
14.671
:11.14
' INCLUDES APPROXIMATELY 60 CONNECTIONS ADDED TO THE OUTLET FLOW FROM BASIN 4 IN EDINA
` INCLUDES APPROXIMATELY 1500 CONNECTIONS ADDED TO THE FLOW FROM SEGMENT 1 OF MINNEAPOLIS FLOW
NOTE: FLOWS FOR BOTH SEGMENTS WERE DERIVED USING AVERAGES OF DATA FROM EDINA BASINS 1 AND 4 AND INTERPOLATED BASED ON NUMBERS OF CONNECTIONS
16
C. Infiltration
Infiltration is a variable quantity that depends significantly upon the
level of ground water and whether it is a wet period (rainy) or a dry
period. Dry weather infiltration can be determined by comparing the
sanitary sewer base flow to the dry weather average flow. Dry
weather infiltration would be the difference of these two quantities.
This would be designated as dry weather flow infiltration.
Dry Weather Infiltration
The dry weather infiltration can also be estimated by looking at the
minimum nighttime flows during a dry period. Meter records for M -127
and M -129 were reviewed for night time minimum flows for two
different dry periods - September 15 -21, 1996, and February 16 -22,
1977. The 1996 period was selected because it was very dry and
resulted in Minnehaha Creek being dry. Winter periods in Minnesota
are also considered dry weather. The resultant dry weather minimum
flows are tabulated as follows:
Dry Period Meter 127 Meter 129 Total
September 15 -21, 1996 679 gpm 1,634 gpm 2,313 gpm
February 16 -22, 1977 693 gpm 1,674 gpm 2,367 gpm
1983 1 & I Report - - 1,932 gpm
Wet Weather Infiltration
As indicated before, infiltration will increase during wet periods
because of higher ground water levels and possible saturated soils.
Wet weather infiltration rates were determined for the sewer system by
reviewing the night time flow records during August 24 -30, 1997. This
was a period of no rain shortly after the significant rainfall amounts
during July and August. The resultant wet weather minimum flows are
tabulated as follows:
Wet Period Meter 127 Meter 129 PS14 Total
August 24 -30, 1997 1,070 gpm 2,281 gpm 1,064 gpm 3,351 gpm
The wet weather infiltration rates have been utilized to determine the
normal average sanitary flows during this very wet period. The Pump
Station 14 meter measures all the flow from Area C. The wet weather
infiltration for Area B would be 1,217 gpm because Meter 129
measures all the flow from both Area B and C.
17 11413
D. Inflow
Inflow of clear water into the sanitary sewer system must be
determined by examining flow meter records during significant storm
events. Inflow can be identified from the daily flow record and is
represented by a more direct and rapid impact on the total flow rate.
The wastewater flow records that occurred during July 151 , July 21 -22,
and August 19 of 1997 have been plotted to indicate the potential
impact of inflow on the sanitary sewer system.
The July 1 storm was considered a 100 year storm event with very
intense rainfall (an average of 2.8 inches for the City) that fell from
about 7:45 PM to 8:45 PM. The meter records for this storm for meter
127, 129 and PS 14 are plotted on Figures V -2, V -3, and V -4. For
comparison to a period of no rain, the meter records for August 27 are
plotted on Figures V -5, V -6, and V -7. The plots for Meter 127 indicate
a classic spike in the hydrograph and would indicate all of the flow
from the beginning of the rain (1,300 gpm) to a peak flow of 4,700 gpm
is due to inflow. It should be noted this type of flow increase could
occur at anytime during the day and is additive to the sewer flowrate
during the time of the rain. In other words the spike could be higher or
lower depending on what time of the day the rain event occurred. This
rain event indicates a maximum inflow amount of 3,400 gpm for meter
127 (Area A). The flow charts for M -129 and PS 14 do not indicate as
significant a spike flow for this rain event. The plots would indicate
inflow rates of 2,735 gpm for meter 129 and 260 gpm for meter PS 14.
Area B inflow would be the difference at 2,475 gpm.
The July 21 -22 storm was also a very intense storm event. This storm
is somewhat different than the July 1 storm in that it had more rain (4.0
inches) over a longer period of time. The heaviest rain occurred from
about 11:00 PM (July 21) to 9:00 AM on July 22. The other condition
that affected inflow is the ground was saturated with water. About 12
inches of rain had fallen during the previous 24 days. Saturated
ground would impact inflow because very little rain would soak into the
ground and nearly all of it would pond or runoff. Meter records for M-
129 and PS 14 are plotted on Figures V -8 and V -9. The meter record
of M -127 does not exist because the meter was flooded out during the
storm. The rapid rise in flowrate for meter 129 and PS 14 would
indicate inflow. Meter 129 pegged at about 7,800 gpm because the
meter reached its maximum calibrated range. There is another meter
(M -130) downstream of M -129 which takes Edina flow and most of
Richfield. Comparing the hydrograph for M -130 would provide a
means to estimate the peak flow at M -129. It is estimated
18 11413
"_ _ _ �.I
_ s;
.A
J I
0 t
{
Flow Rate at Meter 129
t.,
on July 1, 1997 Duration of R`ainfall —
10,000
i
O LO O LO O LO o LO O L
5
LO O L O L
91000.",
t
LO
O T' co It O r M It O *
*- co d
d' O r . M q
q O r
r co d
d'
y 5x
O r N M C
r 6
M 6 6
M .
8,000
't j -a',
v
Z
7,000
�1.
'
a
,6,000
`-
:5,000
_
cc
c
4,000 •
"v
3, 000
nM
z
z
2,000
5 a
1,000`
J I
CAD T T T T T- T- r' r" N N N N
W •
Time
i
I
i
i ".
0 t
t.,
O LO O LO O LO o LO O L
LO o L
LO O L O L
Lo O L
L o. L
LO
O T' co It O r M It O *
*- co d
d' O r . M q
q O r
r co d
d'
O r N M C
r 6
M 6 6
M .
i
I
i
i ".
Flow Rate at Meter 127
5,000
- 4,500
4,000
3,500
2J
3,000
_ •' N
2,500
_ N �
c 2,000
IAL
1,5.00
1,000
500
0
A
O LO O LO O LO O LO O LO O LO o o O - O 0
O T N co LO CO I� co O T N co LO - CO P-L co 0 T N C7
N T T T T T T T T N N N N
Time
O LO O LO O Lo' O L O LO O LO o LO O Lo' O LO . O LO
O r co � O r co It O T Cf) It O = T Cf) d• O T Co qt
O T- N M � C6 I� 66 O r N co In C6 �g 00 O r . N (�
r T T T T. T Tf r N N N N
Time
10,000
9,000
8,000
7,000
a
6,000
C�
w
c
5,000
c
4,000=
3,000
-
2,000
1,000
0.
O LO O LO O Lo' O L O LO O LO o LO O Lo' O LO . O LO
O r co � O r co It O T Cf) It O = T Cf) d• O T Co qt
O T- N M � C6 I� 66 O r N co In C6 �g 00 O r . N (�
r T T T T. T Tf r N N N N
Time
5,000
-
4,500_
V
4,000
3,500
C6
CD
V"
CL
3,000
7
%
2,500-
-
7N
2,000
--'-4
0
1,500
-
1-,000
500
V
C6
CD
V"
7
%
V
V"
7
%
7N
Z Y
IM
72a
66 6 1*
co
co,
0
CV
0
7
C\l
Time
Flow Rate at Meter 129
5,000
4,500
4,000
3,500
ra 3,000
v
2,500
oC
c 2,000
z
°2
N
C
�o
1,500-
1,000
Duration of Rainfall
Y
Mt
L s
N�
Lift Station No. 14 Pumping Rate
on July 22, 1997
500.
°o
°O
o
O°
Time
y 1
y
.y
.:F�ei �dry4'4<
S
kt
- "
J Y 6
x
<
x
hr �.
°O °O
60 O
N
6
QO
O
N
O
T
T
T
T
T
N
N
Time
the peak flow at M -129 was about 9,500 gpm. Figure V -10 is a plot of
the M -130 meter for July 22, 1997. The peak flow for M -129 was
estimated by determining the difference in the peak flows for the two
meters during other rain events and applying the difference to the
July 22 storm.
The plot of the flow at the PS 14 meter also indicates this meter
reached a maximum of about 4,300 gpm. This maximum was reached
because this is the maximum pumping rate of this pump station. The
records for this storm would indicate a maximum inflow rate of 5,240
gpm for meter 129 and 2,100 gpm for meter PS 14. Area B inflow
would be the difference at 3,140 gpm.
Flow meter records are also presented for the August 19 storm. Plots
of the wastewater flow for meters M -127, M -129 and PS -14 are shown
on Figures V -11, V -12, and V -13. This storm was also a heavy rain
(3.0 inches) but the rain occurred over a longer period of time and in
two primary time periods (4:00 - 7:00 AM and 9:00 AM - 12:00 Noon).
The resultant hydrographs indicate inflow quantities were minimal.
This would indicate a very intense storm (significant rain over a short
period of time) is necessary before significant inflow would occur.
Even though the August 19 storm had significant rain, the intensity
was not high enough to cause the high inflow rates that occurred on
July 1 and July 22.
The flow meter records for the two intense July storms indicate a
significant amount of inflow. The quantities of inflow are estimated as
follows:
Rain Event
Meter 127
Meter 129
PS14
Total
July 1, 1997
3,395 gpm
2,735 gpm
260 gpm
6,130 gpm
July 22, 1997
3,395 gpm'
5,240 gpm
2,100 gpm
8,635 gpm
August 19, 1997
805 gpm
2,240 gpm
1,300 gpm
3,045 gpm
Estimated to be at least as high as July 1 because of no meter
records.
E. Storm Event Total Wastewater Flows
The components of the wastewater flow that contributed to the peak
flows that occurred during the recent July storms have been tabulated
to indicate the breakdown of the components. The total flows are
estimated based on the addition of base flow, wet weather infiltration,
and maximum inflow. The estimated component flow sources for
these rainfall events are tabulated in Table V -2.
27 11413
N)
Flow Rate at Meter 130
Duration of Rainfall
on July 22,
1997
15,000
12,500
10,000
..� ���,. XII .
�.r
w �
is
7,500
Y
LLt
- a
5,000_-
4
2,500
O LO O LO O LO O M O LO
O YJ O L/ O LO O L/ O
-
O T C'0 I O T Ch I O T
Ch It O T Ch Nt O T CY
CD
(5 T CV CY) Lb CC) I� 00 O T
N M � Co I� ! 60 O T CV
C
T T
T T T T T T N N N
Time
0
Flow Rate at Meter 127
Duration of Rainfall on August-19,199.7
5,000
: t
4,500
- x
4,000
_
s
�,
3,500
.
�W�
a 3,000,
0
v
,
4
.
,,
2
°
.
.0-2,500
2,000
c
#
p
LIL
x
1 500
F
1,000
..r
.:
_
500
O O 0 0 . O 0 0 O O O O O O O O . O 0 O ' O O O O 0 0
O O 0 OO 0 0 O O O O O O O 00 0 OO O O O O O
&i 4 6 C6 f,: 00. 0 O r. N M ** C6 f: 00 -0' O T N M
N N N .N
Time
t
Flow Rate 'at Meier 129
Lift Station No. 14 Pumping Rate
Ai wim ief 10 1007 1
TABLE V -2. FLOW SUMMARY FOR JULY 1 AND JULY 22
July 1, 1997
Flow Component Meter 127 Meter 129 PS1412' Total
Base Flow 625 gpm
1,980 gpm
1,140 gpm
2,605 gpm
Infiltration `'' 700 gpm
1,750 gpm
750 gpm
2,450 gpm
Inflow 3,395 qpm
2,735 gpm
260 gpm
6,130 gpm
Maximum Flow 4,720 gpm
6,465 gpm
2,150 gpm
11,185 gpm
July 22, 1997
Flow Component
Meter 127
Meter 129
PS14
Total
Base Flow
625 gpm
1,980 gpm
1,140 gpm
2,605 gpm
Infiltration (3'
1,070gpm
2,280 gpm
1,060 gpm
3,350 gpm
Inflow
3,395 gpm`4'
5,240 gpm
2,100 gpm
8,635 gpm
Maximum Flow
5,090 gpm
9,500 gpm (4)
4,300 gpm
14,590 gpm
(1) Dry Weather Infiltration
(2) PS14 is included in the flow at M -129
(3) Wet Weather Infiltration
(4) Estimated Values
F. Hydraulic Analysis of the Existing Sanitary Sewers
One of the objectives of this study was to evaluate the hydraulic
conveyance capacity of the Edina sanitary sewer system. This was
done to determine if lack of sewer flow capacity was a contributing
factor in the sanitary sewer problem areas encountered during the July
22 storm event.
Two flow conditions were evaluated to provide information about the
adequacy of existing sewers. These included the average wet
weather flow and the projected peak flow for the July 22 storm. The
average wet weather flow would be representative of the average flow
during July on days when there was no rain. The average wet weather
flow would be considered the normal operating system during wet
periods.
32 11413
The average wet weather flow is the summation of the base flow and
the wet weather infiltration. These were tabulated for each of the
system basins in Table V -1 to provide a basis for comparison of this
average wet weather flow to the existing rated sewer capacity. The
outlet pipe from each basin coincides with the hydraulic control point
for most, but not all basins. Under these flow conditions, all of the
basin outlet pipes were well within the rated sewer capacity. The
highest utilization of capacity under this flow condition was the 24 inch
trunk sewer discharging from Area C to Lift Station 14 at approximately
71 percent of rated capacity. Figures V -14, V -15, and V -16 have been
included to present this information more graphically and to indicate
the comparison of the average wet weather flow (without rain) to the
rated sewer capacities.
The second flow condition examined is the peak flow condition for the
July 22 storm. This peak flow condition is a summation of the base
flow, the wet weather infiltration and the peak inflow. The peak inflow
for this storm was distributed to the service area basins in the same
proportion as was determined in the 1983 Infiltration and Inflow report.
These peak flows are tabulated in Table V -1. The comparison of
these peak flows with the basin outlet pipe capacity indicates several
of the trunk sewers were at or above the rated capacity. This indicates
the entire system for the City of Edina was at near full or full pipe
condition. The two main trunk sewers serving Edina, the 24 inch
serving Area A and the 33 inch serving Area B and C, were stressed to
full or slight surcharge condition. Figures V -17, V -18 and V -19 are
included to illustrate the comparison of the peak flow on July 22 to the
rated sewer capacities.
The analysis of peak flow condition has isolated some specific sewer
pipe sections which are identified with possible capacity problems.
These warrant further discussion and analysis.
1. Basin 14 sewer feeding Pump Station 14.
The rated capacity of this 24 inch sewer is 3,100 gpm and
compares to the pump station capacity of 4,300 gpm. During the
July 22 storm the flow discharged by this pump station was
metered at 4,300 gpm which means the inlet sewer was able to
deliver that quantity to the station. The only way this pipe could
deliver this amount of flow would be if it was operating as a
pressure pipe and was under a surcharge condition.
33 11413
Area A - Sanitary Sewer System
Average Wet Weather Flow Conditions - No Rain
1930 gpm
18" 260 gpm
Basin 5 1 Nos
260 gpm
Notes: 1.
Italics flows are sewer capacities
Basin 8 1715 gpm Basin 7
under gravity flow conditions.
15"
2.
Refer to Figure III -1 for basin
230 gpm
locations.
230 gpm
310 gpm
00
Basin 6
947 gpm
Basin 4
4800 gpm
12"
24111) 24" 27„
M 127 I "-t
440 gpm
440 gpm
440 gpm
1680 gpm
1930 gpm
18" 260 gpm
Basin 5 1 Nos
260 gpm
CA)
Ln
i
Area B - Sanitary Sewer System
Average Wet Weather Conditions - No Rain
Basin 13 1104gpm Basin 12
10"
245 gpm 245 gpm 280 gpm f Notes: 1. Italics flows are sewer capacities
�o under gravity flow conditions.
S� r�3` A 2. Refer to Figure III -1 for basin
J` locations.
Basin 11
140 gpm
2450 gpm
Basin l0A 1871 Basin 1OB
f�
325 gpm 990 gpm 325 gpm
Oil Basin 9
12 Pump Station
CD
No. 14
0
2200 gpm 735 gpm
8135 gpm
33"
M1
4250 gpm
0
z
rjQ
CD
Area C Sanitary Sewer System
Average Wet Weather Conditions - No Rain
Basin 21 848 gpm Basin20
12"
200 gpm 200 gpm 260 gpm
Q
O
.J`
Notes: 1. Italics flows are sewer capacities
under gravity flow conditions.
2. Refer to Figure III -1 for basin Basin 19
locations.
Basin 18
190 gpm
1405 Win Basin 17
15"
185 gpm I _ _ _ °i --
Basin 16 1257 gpm Basin 15
15"
Pump Station
No. 14
325 gpm
l �f� 3111 gpm
24„
2200 gpm
2438 gpm Basin 14
21"
285 gpm I " ' 61 .•• 1 230 gpm I -'— " "` 1 525 gpm
CO
v
:n
UQ
C
Basin 8
565 gpm
Area A - Sanitary Sewer System
Peak Inflow Conditions - July 22,1997
1715 gpm
15"
565 gpm
Notes: 1. Italics flows are sewer capacities
Basin 7 under gravity flow conditions.
2. Refer to Figure III -1 for basin
locations.
1125 gpm
all
00
basin 6 947 gpin Basin 4 4800 gpm
12" 24"
1595 gprn 1595 gpm 1280 gpm 5080 gpm
1930 gpm
18" 1515 gpm
Basin 5
515 gpm
I
4330 gpm 5925 gpm
24" 27"
M127 5080 gpm 6580 gpm
Mp1s
1500 gpm
W
00
Basin 13
970 gpm
1-n
PO
1104gpm
10"
97gpm
Area B - Sanitary Sewer System
Peak Inflow Conditions - July 22, 1997
Basin 12
690 gpm
0
s
j66p 9`5
Basin 11
k
Notes: 1. Italics flows are sewer capacities
under gravity flow conditions.
2. Refer to Figure III -1 for basin
locations.
665 gpm �o
-P;�,o
Basin l0A 201 1 pM
590 gpm 2915 gpm
Basin 10B
f�
595 gpm
Basin 9 8135 gpm
Pump Station 33" M129 -�
No. 14 0 4300 gpm 1690 9p m 9500 gpm
A
�1n
G
Area C - Sanitary Sewer System
Peak Inflow Conditions - July 22, 1997
Basin 21 848 gpm
12"
360 gpm 360 gpm
Basin 20
Basin 18
610 gpm 250 gpm
f
9�0 js,'°� 0 j�;'O� Pump Station
No. 14
Notes: 1. Italics flows are sewer capacities
under gravity flow conditions. Basin 19 1405 gpm Basin 17
2. Refer to Figure III - I for basin 15"
locations. 1330 gpm
360 gpm 705 gpm
Basin 16 1257 gpm
15"
420 gprn I ' -- ""'
3111 gpm
s
24„
4300 gpm
Basin 15 2438 gpm Basin 14
21"
445 gpm I ""✓ 51'"' 1 1150 gpm
The trunk sewer feeding Lift Station 14 was analyzed more closely
to determine why homes are not affected when the pumping station
is at full capacity. The sewer in this location is relatively deep
compared to grade elevations. The location where homes would
be the closest to the sewer is on Hibiscus Avenue near Highway
100. The lowest basement elevation in this area was about 826.0.
The assumption for this report was the average basement for a
rambler style home would be 8 feet below the main floor level and
the main floor level would be about 2 feet above the street. Actual
conditions may have basements higher or lower than this
assumption. Based on this approximation, the average basement
elevation would be about 6 feet below street level. The assumed
downstream water surface elevation was the top of sewer at the lift
station at elevation 814.0. The head required to force 4,300 gpm
through the system is about 11.5 feet at Highway 100 which means
the water surface elevation would be 825.5. This is just slightly
below the floor elevation of the lowest basement in the area so no
back -ups would be expected in this area. This sewer is able to
convey flow up to the Lift Station 14 capacity by operating under a
surcharge without backups into basements along the sewer.
2. Tower/Woodcrest Area
The section of sewer showing the most potential for surcharging is
in the Tower/Woodcrest area. The 12 inch diameter pipe draining
this basin would be at about 168 percent of capacity under the
predicted peak flow conditions. This would correlate with the high
concentration of sewer back -ups experienced along this length of
sewer. Strictly from a hydraulic capacity consideration, it appears
contributing flow in this area needs to be reduced either by
diverting flow to other drainage basins, adding additional capacity,
or by reducing infiltration and inflow quantities.
A hydraulic profile for this area including the 24 inch trunk sewer
that continues into the Minneapolis system is shown on Figure
V -20. The profile was done at the conveyance capacity of 4,800
gpm in the 24 inch trunk sewer. The profile illustrates why homes
in this area are affected during periods of peak flow through the
system. The quantity of wastewater in the system is greater than
the rated sewer capacity of the 12 inch portion of sewer. This
condition causes a surcharge or pressure flow in the pipe. As flow
volumes increase, the hydraulic grade line of the system is forced
upward to push more flow through the pipe. When the hydraulic
grade line rises above the low point of the basement, sewage
enters the home through floor drains, showers, toilets, etc.
40 11413
910.00
905.00
900.00
895.00
890.00
885.00
880.00
rL
z
0 875.00
Q
W
W 870.00
865.00
860.00
855.00
850.00
845.00
840 00
SANITARY SEWER PROFILE FROM TOWER ST. TO METER STATION
Peak Flow Condition of 4800 GPM at Meter Station
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000
SEWER LENGTH (FT.)
8000 9000
10000 11000
41 Figure V -20.
4 Invert Elevation
Top Elevation
x W.S. Profile @ 4,800 gpm
• Assumed Basement Floor Elev.
XD
0
0
Basement floor assumed 6 feet below surface of road
a
CD
0
0
(n
0
0.
n '
c
CL
CL
,,1^^
V/
CL
00
d
00
0
0-
C
m
CL
03
<
0
0
CL
co
D
n
o
o
w
a
m
s
CD
iv
CL
j
0
CD
CD
CD
CD
m
�
a�
cn
CD
rn
�
�
�
m m
876.84
.°rte
�,
°
�
o
>
>
's
en
/3�
2
CD
CD
a
a
\!�CD
a
W
Cn
0
N
>
_
7
j
7
?
�
-
m m
12"
Sewer
`
(v
°.
o
a
>
s
>
w
n
m
v
(�
� m F. � 5* -
m
0
O
N
W
m
3
�D
7
869.63
N
77
N
7
W
�
77
(=D CD
Cn C (D S
ti
868.80
a
�_
CD
Q
m
m
CD
m
m
C�
n
mm a w n w w
(�
0
867.30
w
a�
�
CD
(n n
A-"
N
7
4.
0
g
cn
�
CD
W iD 77 COD
m
864.55
863.5
cn
o
w
0
o
w � (� '� '
cn
62.88
, 861.00
rn
a Q n
Jo
Ln
J
FL 0 � m CD
cn
(D
�
cn
12" Sewer
,�"
852.62
a "
x'851:0.0
j cn
8FA
so
849.35
848.80
848.06
46fiD
--- a
8
844.08 843.60 j p
842.88
842.50
840.75
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000
SEWER LENGTH (FT.)
8000 9000
10000 11000
41 Figure V -20.
The lowest basement elevations in this area are just above the top
of the sewer. The hydraulic profile shows several sections of sewer
where the water surface elevation in the system is above basement
floor elevations. Based on these assumptions, the entire area from
Tower Street at St. Johns Avenue to Woodland Road /Brookview
Avenue would be affected along with the section near Woodcrest
Drive and West 56th Street. This finding correlates with the high
density of complaints received by the city in these areas.
The profile illustrates the 24 inch main trunk sewer has more
capacity relative to an expected peak flow condition than the 12
inch sewer through the Tower/Woodcrest area. Therefore, the
capacity of the 12 inch line controls the system. When the 24 inch
trunk sewer is receiving a peak conveyance of 4,800 gpm, the
estimated flow in the 12 inch sewer is about 1,420 gpm (estimate is
based on proportions of flow seen in the 1981 Donohue report). It
has been estimated the hydraulic profile of the 12 inch sewer would
drop below the lowest basement level at about 1,200 gpm. At this
flow rate the 12 inch sewer would be surcharged, but the estimated
water surface elevation would be below basement levels based on
our assumptions. This conclusion also assumes unrestricted flow
in the system.
3. St. Johns /Ashcroft Area
This area is a part of Basin 10 which also shows the potential for
surcharging under peak flows and ideal flow conditions at the basin
outlet. The 24 inch trunk sewer draining this basin is near capacity
(92 percent), but below surcharging levels. However, the hydraulic
control point in this basin is not the basin outlet, but is actually the
18 inch diameter sewer at the intersection of St. Johns Avenue and
Garrison Lane. The interpolated flow at this location is
approximately 2,915 gpm for peak flow conditions. The capacity is
about 2,050 gpm so the potential for surcharging is very high. The
projected peak flow is about 140 percent of capacity under ideal
flow conditions. This potential surcharging condition in the 18 inch
diameter trunk may partially explain the problems experienced in
the low lying areas of St. Johns /Ashcroft.
The hydraulic profile for this area is included as Figure V -21. The
profile was determined for only the immediate St. Johns /Ashcroft
area up to the point where the 18 inch sewer changes to 21 inch.
The flow rate used in the profile was 2,700 gpm which is the
maximum rated sewer capacity of the 21 inch sewer. This flow
42 11413
00D.vv
880.00
875.00
i
I
I
St: Johns/'Ashcroft Sanitary Sewer Profile(Main Trunk)'
2,700 gpm (Gravity.Conveyance Capacity of 21 Sewer with Slope= 0.12%)
,
_ 2.,40"
z �
� 7
o °D 878 79 a a .
n
0 Z, CL a.
g X21 RCP ,
5
872 25
SD
Ln
-%M Slope
qt-
N
u k
4
81
Slope 0,27
y Slo 1 50%
861
RCP
u ty 85814'
85
8 857
,s
T 2 ;18p C
Slope 0160 856'.'55'
1" R
2 C 856:17
co
c -
m 0 500 1000 1500 2000 ;2500 3000 3500 4000 4500-
,�, Sewer Length (ft)
4,
i
I
c
w °
870.00
W
865.00
860.00.
855 00
i
I
I
St: Johns/'Ashcroft Sanitary Sewer Profile(Main Trunk)'
2,700 gpm (Gravity.Conveyance Capacity of 21 Sewer with Slope= 0.12%)
,
_ 2.,40"
z �
� 7
o °D 878 79 a a .
n
0 Z, CL a.
g X21 RCP ,
5
872 25
SD
Ln
-%M Slope
qt-
N
u k
4
81
Slope 0,27
y Slo 1 50%
861
RCP
u ty 85814'
85
8 857
,s
T 2 ;18p C
Slope 0160 856'.'55'
1" R
2 C 856:17
co
c -
m 0 500 1000 1500 2000 ;2500 3000 3500 4000 4500-
,�, Sewer Length (ft)
4,
i
I
would correlate to approximately 3,250 gpm in the 24 inch trunk
sewer exiting Basin 10.
The profile was done to determine an approximate maximum flow
rate allowable before sewage would back -up into residential
basements. Assumptions for basement elevations were the same
as discussed in the previous section. As shown in the profile, the
most suspect area is at the south end of St. Johns Avenue at the
intersection with the frontage road for Highway 62. The estimated
basement floor elevation in the surrounding homes was 861.0 feet
and the water surface elevation in the profile would be about 861.6
feet. Because the hydraulic grade line is slightly above basement
floor level, there is the potential for a sanitary back -up to occur.
Therefore, the maximum flow rate would be slightly less than 2,700
gpm even though the downstream trunk sewer is not near capacity
under these conditions. This conclusion is based on unrestricted
flow through the system.
4. Limerick Area
The Limerick area forms a small part of Basin 18. This area is
drained by a 12 inch diameter pipe that discharges into the 15 inch
diameter main in Basin 17. There is no evidence of surcharging for
the 12 inch pipe under peak loading conditions. Actually, only a
small portion of pipe capacity is being utilized (approximately 32
percent). There is no evidence showing an inadequate conveyance
capacity was responsible for the problems experienced during July.
The 15 inch diameter trunk sewer receiving flow from the Limerick
area is stressed under peak flow conditions, but does not appear
surcharged. Peak flow would occupy about 95 percent of the pipe
capacity under ideal flow conditions.
G. TV Survey
In an effort to gain insight into the physical condition of the sanitary
sewers, the City initiated a televised survey of a portion of the sanitary
sewer system. Sewer inspection was done in several areas of town
with priority given to those areas that experienced problems. The final
tally for the televising included 33,207 feet (6.3 miles) of pipe which is
about 3 -1/2 percent of all sanitary sewer in Edina. The following
summary includes general observations for the overall system and
also items of concern in the defined problem areas.
44 11413
1. General Observations
The sanitary sewer system throughout most of Edina is between 40
and 60 years old. The majority of pipe is vitrified clay while some
areas have small amounts of reinforced concrete pipe or ductile
iron pipe. Sanitary systems of this age are expected to have some
degradation and possible misalignment. The television survey
report indicates these types of conditions through most of the
surveyed areas. In areas where this degradation is more
advanced, the capacity of the system can be significantly affected
and the sewer line would generally be more conducive to
blockages.
The pipe included in the televising had minor instances of joint
misalignment, cracking, deposition of material, or root invasion.
These items are all indicative of the age of the sewer system. One
item of interest was the amount of mineral deposits at joints or at
service connections in the clay or concrete pipes. This would
typically indicate a certain amount of seepage is occurring at each
of the affected joints. The extent of joints having these deposits is
a potential indicator of the amount of infiltration into the system.
The majority of the northeast trunk sewer follows Minnehaha
Creek. Very little of this section of sanitary sewer was included in
the television survey. The areas along the creek would be the
most suspect regions for infiltration because of the inherently high
water table compared to the sanitary sewer. A short section of 15
inch diameter pipe was televised in the vicinity of Wooddale
Avenue /50th Street adjacent to Minnehaha Creek. The report
indicated approximately 20 gpm of infiltration at joints in 719 feet of
sewer. If this amount of infiltration is consistently found along the
creek, total infiltration could be significant. In comparison the
average infiltration rate for the City is 18.6 gpm per mile of sewer.
Our recommendation is for continued televising of the northeast
trunk sewer all along Minnehaha Creek to confirm actual
conditions.
In summary, the report from the sewer televising operation indicated
conditions are about as expected for a system of this age. Many of the
pipe joints had mineral deposition and offset joints with the potential for
seepage into the system. However, there was little evidence of major
structural problems in the system such as breakage or collapse.
45 11413
The city currently relies on the natural flow velocity of the larger trunk
sewers (15 inches and larger) to keep these pipes clean. Under new
pipe conditions, this philosophy would probably be effective. However,
because of symptoms of age in the system such as pipe misalignment
and offset joints, the system becomes more susceptible to blockage by
sticks, rags, etc. The flushing velocity of the system may not always
be enough to keep the pipes clean under these conditions. We would
recommend implementation of a trunk sewer cleaning program to help
insure smooth flow through the system.
2. Tower/Woodcrest Area
The 12 inch diameter sewer serving the Tower/Woodcrest area
was televised from Highway 100 to the junction with the 24 inch
diameter trunk sewer. The sewer is showing signs of aging, but
there was no evidence of either major blockage in this section or
severe damage to the pipe. The report does indicate that there is
minor vertical misalignment, some offset joints and mineral
deposits at joints and service connections.
Most of these items contribute to minor amounts of inflow or
infiltration normally expected in a system of this age.
3. St. Johns /Ashcroft Area
The main trunk sewer serving the St. Johns /Ashcroft area was
televised from Highway 100 to just south of Highway 62
(Crosstown). This portion of the sanitary sewer system was similar
to the previously discussed areas in regard to general degradation
of the sewer with age. There is some evidence through the area
televised of minor joint leakage and vertical misalignment causing
some offset joints.
An item of concern is the number of connections showing flow of
clear water. This could be caused by sump pump discharges
connected to the sanitary system or there may be significant
amounts of infiltration entering the service piping. Either way, this
clear water source is adding to the flow through the line and should
be minimized if possible.
4. Limerick Area
A relatively small length of sewer was televised in the Limerick area
including a portion of Valley Lane, Creek Drive, Doron Lane and
Valley View Road to the junction with the trunk sewer on Tracy
Avenue. This portion of the sanitary sewer was similar to the
46 11413
previously discussed areas in regard to general degradation of the
sewer with age. There was some evidence throughout this section
of minor joint leakage and vertical misalignment causing some
offset joints.
H. House Survey
One of the primary tasks for this study was to determine the extent of
sump pump and foundation drain connections to the sanitary system.
Sump pump and foundation drain connections to a sanitary system
can contribute large amounts of inflow. A survey of homes was
authorized by the City to gain insight for an estimate of the number of
sump and foundation drain connections into the sanitary system. The
survey consisted of 500 homes in various areas to collect
representative data for the entire city. A sample of the survey
questionnaire is included in Appendix C.1.
1. Description of House Survey
The survey plan consisted of two focus points. The first areas to
concentrate surveying efforts were in the three primary complaint
zones based on calls received by the city during the July storm
event. Data from these areas helps determine if problems were
caused by excessive localized inflow into the sanitary system.
Surveying these areas also provided general information to help
compile representative values for the entire city. There were 222
houses surveyed in these problem areas.
The second focus point for surveying included areas from around
the city and encompassed a variety of topography, soil types, and
age of homes. This focus point was much more arbitrary than
concentration on the specific problem areas. Neighborhoods in the
following general areas of Edina were targeted to provide a
representative survey.
a. Southwest area near Braemar Park provides data from newer
homes with a variety of topography and a limited number of
complaints during the event. The problem area of Limerick
Drive is in the Southwest quadrant of the city. Number of
surveyed homes: 72
b. Southeast area near Oaklawn Ave. represents an area with few
complaints and with relatively low ground elevations of homes.
Number of surveyed homes: 65
47 11413
c. Northwest area near Mirror Lake represents a variable
topographic area with few complaints and is not represented by
any of the problem areas. This area lies at the beginnings of
the major southern trunk sewers. Number of surveyed homes:
92
rel
Northeast area represents the oldest section of town. The
Northeast section is also partially represented by the problem
areas of Tower St. and Woodcrest. Number of surveyed
homes: 49
Almost all of the surveys were house to house visits to confirm
information given on the questionnaire and to get public input on
the nature and the extent of sanitary problems or other water
problems experienced during the July storms. However, some
surveys (approximately 5 percent) were done over the phone for
the convenience of the resident.
2. Results of House Survey
A tabulation of results for the house survey is shown in Table V -3.
Some general observations from the survey include the following
items.
a. Approximately 1/3 of all Edina homes have sump pumps in their
basements.
b. Approximately 23 percent of homes with sump pumps have
connections to the sanitary system. This constitutes about 7
percent of all homes.
c. 44 percent of surveyed homes had some type of water problem
in their basement during the July storm event. The sanitary
system contributed to approximately 37 percent of the problem
homes.
48 11413
Table V -3. Sanitary Sewer Home Survey Results
AREA
NUMBER
SURVEYS
FOUNDATION DRAINS
BASEMENT SUMP PUMP
FREOUENCY OF OPERATION FOR IMPROPERLY
CONNECTED SUMPS
BASEMENT WATER PROBLEMS
AMOUNT OF WATER
SANITARY SHUT -OFF VALVE
HOUSE GUTTERS AND DOWNSPOUTS
YES
NO
UNSURE
DRAINS
TO SAN.
DRAINS
TO SUMP
YES
NO
UNSURE
SANITARY
CONNECTION
YES
NO
SANITARY
SOURCE
UNSURE
SOURCE
MINOR
SOAKED
CARPETS
STANDING
WATER
YES
NO
UNSURE
YES
NO
IMPROPER
DISCHARGE
OFTEN
HALFTIME
INFREQUENT
UNSURE
Northeast Quadrant:
146
Tower / Woodland / Woodcrest
97
57
32
8
2
50
44
53
0
7
5
1
1
0
79
18
53
2
25
6
48
10
72
15
94
3
0
Chowen / 58th Street / Beard / 601h Street
25
0
23
2
0
0
0
25
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
22
0
0
3
0
0
0
25
0
25
0
0
Drexel / Sunn side / Casco / Bride
24
1 1
23
0
0
1
3
19
2
0
0
0
0
0
1 8
16
1
0
7
1
0
0
23
1
23
1
0
Southeast Quadrant:
107
Ashcroft / St. Johns / Garrison
42
19
18
5
1
16
20
21
1
4
2
0
0
2
24
18
16
0
8
1
7 5
1
37
4
41
t
0
Wilford Way / West Shore / Dunber / Brittany
21
0
21
0
0
0
3
18
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
17
0
0
4
0
0
0
21
0
21
0
0
Glouchester / Mavelle / Heatherton / 72nd Street
16
0
16
0
0
0
2
14
0
2
0
2
0
0
6
10
0
0
5
1
0
0
16
0
16
0
0
Fondell / Oaklawn / Gilford / Wooddale
28
1
27
0
0
1
1
27
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
22
0
0
6
0
0
0
28
0
28
0
0
Southwest Quadrant:
155
Limerick / Creek / Valley Lane / Doron
83
52
19
12
0
46
52
30
1
15
12
2
1
0
35
48
9
4
13
7
15
1
68
14
83
0
0
Kemrich / Tara / Dewey Hill / Shannon
22
3
12
7
0
1
1
21
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
19
0
0
3
0
0
2
20
0
22
0
0
Gleason / Sche / Dewey Hill
15
5
10
0
0
2
2
13
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
11
0
0
3
0
1
0
15
0
12
3
0
Salley / Paiute
14
4
10
0
0
3
3
11
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
10
0
0
3
1
0
0
14
0
14
0
0
West Trail / Samuel / Sioux Trail
21
8
11
2
0
4
7
13
1
2
0
1
1
0
10
11
0
0
5
1
4
0
21
0
19
2
0
Northwest Quadrant:
92
Parkwood / Id wood / Knoll
28
10
16
2
1
4
5
23
0
2
1
0
0
1
12
16
0
0
8
1
3
0
28
0
28
0
0
Mirror Lakes / Northwood / Chantre / Ayrshire
19
1
14
4
0
1
1
18
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
14
0
0
5
0
0
0
19
0
18
1
0
Lochlo / Cr den
8
2
3
3
0
1
1
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
7
0
0
1
0
0
0
8
0
8
0
0
Tracy / Vernon / Johnson / Warden
18
5
12
1
0
5
6
12
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
11
0
0
4
2
1
0
18
0
18
0
0
Walnut / Tamarac / Aspen
19
8
6
5
0
7
9
10
0
5
3
0
0
2
9
10
3
0
5
1
3
0
19
0
18
1
0
Totals 500 176 273 51 4 142 160 335 5 37 23 6 3 5 220 280 82 6 108 22 90 14 452 34 488 12 0
Percentage of Homes With Sump Pumps
32.0
Percentage of Total Homes With Illegal Sump Pump
or Foundation Drain Connections
8.2
Percentage of Illegal Connections Among Homes
With Sump Pumps
23.1
Percentage of Homes With Water Problems
44.0
Percentage of Sanitary Problems Among Total
Homes With Water Problems
37.3
Percentage of Homes With Standing Water
in Basement
18.0
49
About 1/2 of the homes with problems assessed the water as
minor seepage of stormwater into the basement.
d. The vast majority of homes do not have sanitary sewer shut -off
valves on their connections. The only people with valves had
major sanitary sewer back -ups in the past and several people
still had problems in July because the valve did not operate
properly.
e. Approximately 98 percent of surveyed homes had gutters and
downspouts, but none were found to have a connection
between a downspout and the sanitary system.
f. About 35 percent of surveyed residents were sure they had a
foundation drain with 10 percent of respondents unsure about
the question. Of the 176 homes with foundation drains, only 4
had any direct connection with the sanitary system. However,
the majority of foundation drains ran to a sump pit where
drainage could indirectly enter the sanitary system if the pump
discharge went to the sanitary system.
g. Out of 278 homes surveyed in areas not delineated as
"problem" areas, only 4 homes had water in their basement they
characterized as being from a sanitary source.
h. 70 percent of homes with sump discharges connected to the
sanitary system were located in "problem" areas. Problem area
homes constituted 44 percent of the survey.
One of the primary reasons for the house survey was to determine the
potential for inflow from sump pump connections to the sanitary
system. This is especially important in the areas having sanitary back-
ups during the July 22 storm events because inflow from sump pumps
may have contributed to the problem.
Tower / Woodcrest Area:
The survey found 7 homes in the Tower / Woodcrest area had sump
discharge connections to the sanitary sewer system. There are about
1,000 additional homes in the Basin 6 drainage area that contribute to
flow, but did not have problems and were not included in the survey.
The overall survey indicated about 4 percent of homes not in "problem"
areas may have sumps discharging into the sanitary system. An
estimate of homes with sumps connected to the sanitary system would
include the 7 found in the survey plus another 40 (1,000 homes x 4
percent). The following assumptions were made to approximate
potential inflow from this source.
30 gpm per sump pump (1/3 hp sump pump)
1/2 of all sump pumps operating at any given time
50 11413
Sump Pump Discharge = 47 homes x 30 gpm /pump x 1/2 = 705 gpm
The rated sewer capacity of the 12 inch diameter sewer draining this
area is approximately 950 gpm. This indicates inflow from sump pump
connections to the sanitary system could be as much as 74 percent of
the capacity of the local sewer.
The vast majority (81 percent) of homes surveyed in the Tower /
Woodcrest area claimed they had at least minor water damage in their
basements. Of these homes, 67 percent claimed the water came from
a sanitary source and the majority were serious problems
characterized by standing water in the basement.
St. Johns / Ashcroft Area:
The survey found 4 homes in the St. Johns / Ashcroft area had sump
discharge connections to the sanitary system. The inflow expected
from these homes would be about 60 gpm. The 9 inch diameter sewer
serving a small portion of this area has an approximate capacity of 570
gpm and the 18 inch diameter trunk sewer serving the other portion of
the area has a rated capacity of approximately 2,050 gpm.
The areas contributing to the 18 inch diameter trunk sewer include
about 3/4 of Basin 10 and all of Basins 11, 12 and 13. The total
number of residences is approximately 2,430. Based on the
assumption of 4 percent of homes in non - problem areas having sumps
connected to the sanitary system, the approximate number of homes
with these sumps would be 97. The flow contribution would be
approximately 1,450 gpm at 30 gpm /sump and the average sump
operating half time. The potential inflow from sumps into this system is
about 70 percent of the rated sewer capacity of the 18 inch sewer.
Slightly more than half (58 percent) of homes surveyed in the St.
Johns / Ashcroft area claimed they had at least minor water damage in
their basements. Of these homes, 68 percent claimed the water came
from a sanitary source and the majority were serious problems
characterized by standing water in the basement.
Limerick Area:
The survey found 15 homes in the Limerick area had sump discharge
connections to the sanitary system. The inflow expected from these
homes is about 225 gpm based on 30 gpm /sump and the average
pump operating half time. The capacity of the 9 inch diameter sewer
draining the Limerick area is approximately 450 gpm. Potential inflow
51 11413
from sump pumps to the sanitary system could be 50 percent of the
carrying capacity.
The Limerick area is an isolated portion of Basin 18. Basin 18 is
drained by a 12 inch diameter sewer with a capacity of approximately
775 gpm. There are about 470 residences in addition to the Limerick
area. These residences would be classified as non - problem areas
with the assumption of 4 percent of homes having a sump pump
discharge to the sanitary system. The potential inflow from this source
including inflow from the Limerick area is about 510 gpm (285 gpm +
225 gpm). This inflow constitutes about 66 percent of the carrying
capacity of the local sanitary system.
The occurrence of sump pumps with discharges connected to the
sanitary system in this area was about 18 percent of homes. This was
a greater percentage than the other two problem areas.
Slightly less than half (42 percent) of homes surveyed in the Limerick
area claimed they had at least minor water damage in their
basements. Of these homes, about 1/4 claimed the water came from
a sanitary source and less than half were serious problems
characterized by standing water in the basement.
I. Manhole Survey
One of the contributors to inflow and infiltration in any sanitary sewer
system is access through manhole covers and manhole structures.
Inflow at manholes can come from two sources. The most obvious
leakage is through vent or pick holes in the cover. The other source is
leakage between the cover and the seating surface of the frame or
leakage through cracks in the upper portion of the structure. Sources
of infiltration are pipe entrances that are not effectively sealed and also
seepage through those parts of the structure below the water table.
The manhole survey was designed to gain some insight into the
potential significance of the inflow problem at manholes. Sources of
infiltration were not included in the study because a comprehensive
study of each manhole would be required and infiltration amounts
would still be difficult to quantify in any meaningful way. Also
infiltration amounts appear to be far less significant than inflow
amounts in the City's sanitary systems for peak flow events.
A survey of manhole covers was initiated in two problem areas of the
Edina system. The areas included in the survey were the Tower /
Woodcrest area and Basin 18 which includes the Limerick area. The
Tower / Woodcrest area includes all of Basin 6 and a portion of
52 11413
Basin 4. Background information used to quantify potential inflow
through manhole covers from both holes in the cover and leakage
between the lid and frame were based on "A Report on Inflow of
Surface Water Through Manhole Covers" by Neenah Foundry Co.
The following values were used for estimating potential inflow through
manhole covers.
Surface Conditions
No Ponding (Flush or
Elevated Cover)
Slight Ponding (1/8" of Head)
Ponding with 1/2" of Head
Ponding with 1" of Head
Ponding with 1 -1/2" of Head
No Ponding (Flush or
Elevated Cover)
Slight Ponding (1/8" of Head)
Ponding with 1/2" of Head
Ponding with 1 " of Head
Ponding with 1 -1/2" of Head
Machined
Bearing Surface
1.1 gpm
1.8 gpm
2.1 gpm
2.5 gpm
3.0 gpm
Non - Machined
Bearing Surface
4.0 gpm
10.6 gpm
13.7 gpm
16.8 gpm
20.0 gpm
Pick Hole / Vent Hole Diameter
1" Dia. 1 -1/2" Dia.
0.4 gpm
0.6 gpm
1.2 gpm
2.3 gpm
2.2 gpm
4.6 gpm
4.4 gpm
9.2 gpm
5.6 gpm
11.4 gpm
A total of 456 manholes were included in the survey with 253 located
in the Tower / Woodcrest area and 203 in Basin 18. An inspection
was made for each manhole cover, but no effort was made to inspect
the interior of the manhole (covers were not removed for inspection).
The following information was tabulated:
• Type of surfacing adjacent to the manhole
• Extent of surface cracking adjacent to the manhole cover
• Number of vent or pick holes in the cover
• Approximate size of holes in the cover
• Relative elevation of the manhole cover in relation to the
surrounding grade
The results of the survey are shown in Tables V -4 and V -5.
53 11413
Table V -4. Tower / Woodcrest Summary of Manhole Survey
Note: Inflow through holes in manhole covers is approximately 16% of all inflow expected through
or around manhole covers
' Surface Types: A - Asphalt; G - Grass; S - Sidewalk
2 Cracked surface around rim of manhole: Y - Yes; N - No
3 Includes both pick holes and vent holes
4 Number value indicates approximate depth below grade; F - Flush with Grade;
E - Elevated Above Grade
5 Inflow values are based on assumptions from the Neenah Foundry Inflow Report
54
�
rn
c
�
a
p
7 E
c
r i
Q "
O
C
�..
N
a�
>
o
'
CO
�Q>
N
o
aD >
75 o
E
H .�..
Q E
m a
E
+o
H
o
=
U
a
v)
o a�
H
c"a
V
S
W
a��i
o
>m
c v
�,
O
O
(D
c m
5
3
O
a) _
a>
aD
o
=
u1
a�
a�
c
_
E
c CO
rn
C
,t
=
o
`a
E
m `
(D :3
2
()
(A
Z
Cd
c Cn
Z
o
d
o
c U
o
d L
A
Y
1
1.5 -1
F
4.6
10
46.0
1.95
0.6
6
13.04
A
Y
1
1.5--
0.5 -1
18.3
1
18.3
0.77
4.6
4.6
25.14
A
Y
1
1.5"
ill
26.0
7
182.0
7.70
9.21
64.4
35.38
A
Y
1
ill
F
4.4
44
193.6
8.19
0.4
17.6
9.09
A
Y
1
1.1
0.5--
15.9
28
445.2
18.84
2.2
61.6
13.84
A
Y
1
1.1
1 -1
21.2
14
296.8
12.56
4.4
61.6
20.75
A
Y
1
ill
1.5--
25.6
4
102.4
4.33
5.6
22.4
21.88
A
Y
0
-
F
4.0
9
36.0
1.52
0
0
0.00
A
Y
0
-
0.5--
13.7
6
82.2
3.48
0
0
0.00
A
Y
0
-
ill
16.8
2
33.6
1.42
0
0
0.00
A
N
1
1.5--
F
4.6
2
9.2
0.39
0.6
1.2
13.04
A
N
1
ill
F
4.4
66
290.4
12.29
0.4
26.4
9.09
A
N
1
ill
0.511
15.9
7
111.3
4.71
2.2
15.4
13.84
A
N
1
ill
1.1
21.2
1
21.2
0.90
4.4
4.4
20.75
A
N
2
1.5--
F
5.2
2
10.4
0.44
1.2
2.4
23.08
A
N
3
1.5"
0.5--
27.6
2
55.2
2.34
13.9
27.8
50.36
A
N
0
-
F
4.0
25
100.0
4.23
0
0
0.00
A
N
0
-
0.5--
13.7
10
137.0
5.80
0
0
0.00
A
N
0
-
1.1
16.8
3
50.4
2.13
0
0
0.00
A
N
7
1.1
1--
47.4
1
47.4
2.01
30.6
30.6
64.56
G
-
1
1.511
E
4.6
1
4.6
0.19
0.6
0.6
13.04
G
-
1
ill
E
4.4
2
8.8
0.37
0.4
0.8
9.09
G
-
1
ill
F
4.4
3
13.2
0.56
0.4
1.2
9.09
G
-
0
-
F
4.0
2
8.0
0.34
0
0
0.00
G
-
7
ill
1.5--
59.4
1
59.4
2.51
39.4
39.4
66.33
Totals
253
2362.6
388.4
Note: Inflow through holes in manhole covers is approximately 16% of all inflow expected through
or around manhole covers
' Surface Types: A - Asphalt; G - Grass; S - Sidewalk
2 Cracked surface around rim of manhole: Y - Yes; N - No
3 Includes both pick holes and vent holes
4 Number value indicates approximate depth below grade; F - Flush with Grade;
E - Elevated Above Grade
5 Inflow values are based on assumptions from the Neenah Foundry Inflow Report
54
Table V -5. Basin 18 Summary of Manhole Survey
Note: Inflow through holes in manhole covers is approximately 12% of all inflow expected through
or around manhole covers
' Surface Types: A - Asphalt; G - Grass; S - Sidewalk
2 Cracked surface around rim of manhole: Y - Yes; N - No
3 Includes both pick holes and vent holes
4 Number value indicates approximate depth below grade; F - Flush with Grade
E - Elevated Above Ground
5 Inflow values are based on assumptions from the Neenah Foundry Inflow Report
55
a�
C7
0) ^
o
rn
o
O
y
y
C
�+ O
C
`i
>
`
O
_
f0
O O
_
c0
>
o
o
a�
�, >
o
t
E
O
�=
E
O
m
v
U
C
sU
W
-
°>
o
L>
rn
oa_�'i
CL
F>'
coo
U
S
�'
m
°
o
CO a)
O
3
W
coma U
3
0
rn 2
_
W
rn
_ L
-O
_
c
cti
v>
-°
_
c
cc L
CU
W
2
0
`m
3 E
aa)
3
ca
aa) :'
(n
(n
Z
0
U
S (D
Z
o
d
o
a L
A
Y
1
1.5"
F
4.6
3
13.8
1.00
0.6
1.8
13.04
A
Y
1
1.5"
0.5"
18.3
1
18.3
1.33
4.6
4.6
25.14
A
Y
1
ill
F
4.4
81
356.4
25.90
0.4
32.4
9.09
A
Y
1
1 "
0.5"
15.9
21
333.9
24.27
2.2
46.2
13.84
A
Y
1
11.
1 "
21.2
4
84.8
6.16
4.4
17.6
20.75
A
Y
0
-
F
4.0
1
4.0
0.29
0
0
0.00
A
N
1
1.5"
F
4.6
1
4.6
0.33
0.6
0.6
13.04
A
N
1
1 "
F
4.4
69
303.6
22.07
0.4
27.6
9.09
A
N
1
1 "
0.5"
15.9
11
174.9
12.71
2.2
24.2
13.84
A
N
1
ill
1 "
21.2
1
21.2
1.54
4.4
4.4
20.75
A
N
2
1.5"
F
5.2
1
5.2
0.38
1.2
1.2
23.08
A
N
0
-
F
4.0
3
12.0
0.87
0
0
0.00
G
-
1
ill
E
4.4
3
13.2
0.96
0.4
1.2
9.09
G
-
1
1"
F
4.4
1
4.4
0.32
0.4
0.4
9.09
G
-
1
1 "
1 "
21.2
1
21.2
1.54
4.4
4.4
20.75
S
N
1
1"
F
4.4
1
4.4
0.32
0.4
0.4
9.09
Totals
203
1375.9
167
Note: Inflow through holes in manhole covers is approximately 12% of all inflow expected through
or around manhole covers
' Surface Types: A - Asphalt; G - Grass; S - Sidewalk
2 Cracked surface around rim of manhole: Y - Yes; N - No
3 Includes both pick holes and vent holes
4 Number value indicates approximate depth below grade; F - Flush with Grade
E - Elevated Above Ground
5 Inflow values are based on assumptions from the Neenah Foundry Inflow Report
55
1. Tower / Woodcrest Area Observations
The main sanitary sewer trunk draining this area is a 12 inch
diameter clay pipe that connects to the primary 24 inch diameter
trunk sewer draining the northeast quadrant of Edina. A field
survey was made of all manholes that could potentially contribute
inflow to the 12 inch main sewer. This included all of Basin 6 and
approximately a quarter of Basin 4. Approximately 15 manholes
were not observed for various reasons.
a. Most manholes were located in the street so the predominant
surface type was asphalt. Nine manholes were located off the
road in grass covered areas.
b. Of the 244 manholes with asphalt surfacing, approximately half
(51.2 percent) had extensive cracking adjacent to the manhole
frame.
c. The majority of manholes had at least one hole in the cover.
196 had at least one hole in the cover (77.5 percent)
190 of these covers had only one hole in the center of the cover
ranging from 1 inch to 1.5 inch in diameter
2 manholes had 7 holes in the cover
d. Most manhole covers were either flush with the surrounding
surface or slightly elevated. Approximately 34 percent were
depressed enough to cause localized ponding over the cover.
The field survey would indicate a significant amount of clear water
could be entering the sanitary system through manhole covers during
high intensity storms. It is very difficult to quantify the amount of inflow
through each manhole cover. Estimates can be based on laboratory
test data done by Neenah Foundry Co., but individual manhole frame
and lid combinations can differ significantly in the amount of inflow. An
estimate of the potential inflow was produced based on the following
information and assumptions:
• Occurrence of a high intensity storm event capable of causing
localized ponding over the manhole cover to a depth equal to the
amount of depression below surrounding grade elevation
• All manhole covers were assumed to have non - machined bearing
surfaces. The inflow values noted in the table were compiled under
laboratory conditions with no attempt made to account for debris
56 11413
such as sand, leaves, etc. Introduction of various types of debris
as encountered in the field would have variable affects on inflow.
The minute openings between the frame and lid could either be
forced wider or could be sealed by the debris.
Estimates of potential inflow values are presented in Tables V -4 and
V -5. Potential inflow from vent or pick holes was separated out of total
inflow for illustrative purposes.
Based upon the preceding assumptions, the maximum potential inflow
(from Table V -4) is approximately 2,350 gpm. This indicates the
potential for inflow through manhole covers in this area is 2'/2 times the
rated capacity of the 12 inch sewer. The inflow expected for just the
pickholes is estimated to be 388 gpm or about 40 percent of the 12
inch sewer. The inflow from manhole covers is expected to be
somewhere between these values.
2. Basin 18 / Limerick Area Observations
The Limerick area was also identified for the manhole study because
there were complaints of sanitary back -ups during the July 22 storm.
The main sanitary sewer trunk draining this area is a 12 inch diameter
clay pipe that connects to the primary 15 inch diameter trunk sewer
draining a portion of the Southwest quadrant of Edina. The two
sewers combine at the intersection of Valley View Road and West 56th
Street. An attempt was made to survey all manholes that could
potentially contribute inflow to the 12 inch main sewer. This included
all of Basin 18 with the exception of approximately 11 that were not
observed for various reasons.
a. Most manholes were located in the street so the predominant
surface type was asphalt. Five manholes were located off the road
in grass covered areas and one manhole was in a sidewalk.
b. Of the 203 manholes with asphalt surfacing, approximately half
(56.3 percent) had extensive cracking adjacent to the manhole
frame.
c. The majority of manholes had one hole in the cover.
198 had one hole in the cover (97.5 percent) and 1 cover had two
holes.
The majority of the holes were approximately 1 inch in diameter (97
percent)
The other holes were approximately 1-1/2 inch diameter.
57 11413
d. Most manhole covers were either flush with the surrounding
surface or slightly elevated. Approximately 21 percent were
depressed enough to cause localized ponding over the cover.
An inflow estimate was produced using the same assumptions
developed for the Tower / Woodcrest area. Estimated inflow values
can be seen in Table V -5.
The results of the manhole survey indicate a high intensity storm could
produce inflow as high as 1,375 gpm (3.06 cfs) for Basin 18. The flow
capacity of the 12 inch diameter sewer draining this area is 780 gpm.
Inflow from manhole covers could be as high as 177 percent of the
pipe capacity serving the area. The inflow expected from just the
pickholes is estimated to be 167 gpm or about 20 percent of rated
sewer capacity. Again the expected inflow from manhole covers is
expected to be somewhere between these values.
3. Conclusions
The manhole survey represents data from approximately 10 percent of
all manholes in Edina. The vast majority of manholes have at least
one vent or pick hole in the cover and most likely do not have
machined bearing surfaces between the frame and lid (due to the age
of the system). The estimates of the potential leakage through
manhole covers in the survey areas indicate that inflow from this
source could be significant during high intensity rainfall. A low
intensity storm without ponding would only contribute a small fraction
of the inflow experienced with ponding. This would explain at least
part of the prominent spikes of flow indicated by metering and pumping
records during high intensity storms, but a relative lack of spiking
during lower intensity storms.
4. Recommendations
Efforts to reduce inflow through manhole covers should be initiated to
help relieve stress on the sanitary sewer system during periods of
heavy rain. The primary means for reduction of inflow at manholes is
to replace existing covers with solid, gasketed covers. This type of
manhole cover is essentially water tight under any ponding condition
and can be used with existing manhole frames. An estimated cost for a
replacement cover is about $100 per cover and City crews could do
the labor. The estimated cost of replacing all manhole covers is
$500,000.
58 11413
Chimney seals should be installed on manholes where field inspection
indicates leakage between the manhole cover frame and the structure.
This is especially important in areas subject to stormwater ponding.
A program could be implemented to replace covers and add chimney
seals over a set period of time with manholes in suspected ponding
areas being given priority. The program should also include brief
inspections of manhole structures to identify any obvious defects that
would allow substantial inflow.
59 11413
VI Analysis of Wet Weather Problem Areas
One objective of this study is to determine the reasons, if possible, for the
sanitary sewer back -ups during the July 22 storm. As described in
Chapter IV, there are three primary areas where most of the problems
were encountered. This chapter will evaluate the factors that contributed
to the problems. The investigation for each area will include each of the
following items:
• Analysis of flow metering data.
• Hydraulics analysis of sewer system.
• TV survey work (information provided by the City).
• House to house field survey to gather background information.
• Field survey of manhole covers.
• Additional factors contributing to problems.
A. Tower/Woodcrest Area: Results of the field survey of homes indicated
more than half of residents in the Tower/Woodcrest area had damage
in their basements from water characterized as being from the sanitary
sewer. There are several items that may have contributed to the
extent of the problems in this area.
1. Analysis of Flow Metering Data
The Tower/Woodcrest area is located in sewer Basin 6 and is
served by a 12 inch sewer which discharges into a 24 inch
diameter main trunk near Woodland Circle. The 24 inch trunk
sewer continues along Minnehaha Creek to a flow meter (M -127)
located at the corner of West 54'h Street and Xerxes Avenue. The
24 inch sewer continues into Minneapolis and eventually into the
MCES interceptor system. The flow carrying capacity of these two
sewers is estimated to be 4,800 gpm for the 24 inch and 950 gpm
for the 12 inch:
As indicated in Chapter V, flow charts for meter M -127 were
examined for the July 1 and July 22 storms. The peak flow
measured at the meter on July 1 was 4,712 gpm which is very
close to the rated capacity of this sewer. This large peak flow has
been identified as being generated by inflow into the system. The
estimated inflow for the July 1 storm was 3,400 gpm or 70 percent
of the sewer capacity. This portion of the sewer system was able
to convey the wastewater generated during this storm without any
system problems.
60 11413
Evaluation of the flow meter (M -127) for the July 22 storm was not
possible because the system was inundated. Physical inspection
of the manhole at the meter location indicated the meter was
flooded and a surcharge existed in the sewer.
2. Hydraulic Analysis
Hydraulic analysis of the sanitary conveyance system serving this
area unearthed some concerns about flow capacity. The peak
design flowrate generated in the Tower/Woodcrest area is
estimated to be 1,595 gpm. The estimated flow is higher than the
rated sewer capacity of 950 gpm and would indicate surcharging of
the 12 inch sewer may occur under these conditions.
The 24 inch trunk sewer would be flowing right at maximum
capacity under estimated peak flow conditions. However, the
opportunity for surcharging the system is increased in the
immediate downstream section of the Minneapolis system where
estimated peak flow is 119 percent of the rated sewer capacity.
Surcharging in this section of the sewer would cause a bottleneck
for flow coming from Edina.
3. Televised Sewer Survey
The televised inspection of the sanitary sewer showed signs of
aging in the system as expected. There was evidence of pipe
misalignment, mineral deposition at joints, solids deposition,
hairline cracking, and offset joints. All of these items are not
unusual for a sanitary sewer of this age, but they do contribute to
the amounts of infiltration in the system. There were no serious
problems in the line like significant blockages or pipe collapses. It
does not appear the capacity of the system is being significantly
impacted by the condition of the sewer in the areas televised. A
large segment of the 24 inch trunk was not televised.
4. Field Survey of Homes
Basement sump pumps would have likely been operating during
the storm because of the antecedent saturated soils conditions.
Residents indicated during the field survey that sump pumps were
operating more or less continuously during this time.
The results of the field survey of homes in this area showed about
7 percent of homes had a sump pump discharge connected directly
into the sanitary sewer system. Potential inflow from this souce
61 11413
could be as high as 705 gpm which is approximately 74 percent of
the sewer capacity serving the TowerMoodcrest area.
5. Field Survey of Manholes
The field survey of manhole covers found most covers have at
least one pick or vent hole and about 1/3 of all manholes were
depressed enough to cause ponding over the cover during a high
intensity storm. The inflow amounts from this source are extremely
difficult to quantify. Estimates of manhole inflow for Basin 6 range
from a high of 2,350 gpm to a low of 388 gpm during a high
intensity storm.
6. Additional Factors Contributing to Sanitary Problems
Several factors may have contributed to the failure of this sanitary
sewer system during the July 22 storm including the following:
a. The soils in the area were saturated with water from the earlier
July rains. This would tend to increase the problem of inflow
because nearly all of the rain would runoff or pond. Residents
of the area indicated some street flooding did occur. It is
estimated the inflow amount for this storm would have been
greater than inflow from the July 1 storm.
b. The amount of infiltration into the system was higher due to the
wet conditions. It is estimated the Area A infiltration was about
1,070 gpm.
c. There is evidence of partial blockage of the 24 inch sewer a few
blocks into the Minneapolis system. The Edina City crews
documented unusually high surcharge levels that did not recede
for several days after the July 22 storm. Figure VI -1 is a plot of
the minimum flows recorded for Meter 127. The plot indicates
minimum flows at this meter were abnormally high (2,400 gpm).
On August 15 MCES work crews flushed the sanitary sewer line
downstream of Meter 127. The resultant drop in minimum flows
was dramatic from an average of 2,500 gpm to about 1,000
gpm. This would indicate a restriction downstream was causing
an artificially high level in the flume. A high flume level would
indicate an erroneously high flow measurement. The flow meter
record indicates these elevated minimum flows existed for three
or four days before the July 22 storm.
62 11413
I
I
Flow Rate.at Meter 127
on August' 14 -17,1997
5,000
ij
•4 500
If ¢
�T
•.. P.�`z7 5 '`
f Si
t
4,000
ti
3,500
01" t9
k Ul-
Cleanout of Downstream
"g� Sewer, Section Occurred
3 000
L 3
�a s
c.�
..
�
2
a.• ,500
t 41
2; 000
c
1,500
1,000
1 �
y
.500 r
�
4�
f �
A x
S
.aU.r
t
ill 111101 Ill Hq ill 11"Hrol $I,H 11, 01, 01 1�1 ill Ilk
0 4i till Ill till Ill 1�1 p 11 1 Jill Ill Ill till Ill I
O LO O LO ,O, 7 O LO O In O In O LO O' U) O LO O
M 1- O M qt O M qt
LO . O L/ O
O
O T T T O T CO.- O r M
O in
t _ T CO
00 N 1� r- T in O d' 00 N` M 1Z T O -. O 4
00 M I� T
(~D T T (V T T T N T T N
T T (V
Time i
7. Conclusions.
The following are identified as reasons for the problems in the
TowerMoodcrest Area:
a. High Inflow. Saturated soils from previous rains caused
increased inflow during the heavy rains. Inflow quantity for this
area (Area A) is estimated to be 67 percent of the total peak
flow during the July 22 storm. Infiltration was estimated at 21
percent of the total flow while the base sanitary flow was 12
percent.
Inflow sources are identified as manhole covers, basement
sump pumps connected to the sanitary system, and basement
seepage discharged to floor drains.
b. Partial Blockage. Meter records at M -127 indicate the
downstream sewer in Minneapolis was .partially obstructed
causing a reduced conveyance capacity.
c. Conveyance Capacity. The conveyance capacity of the 12 inch
Tower sewer is less than the estimated total flow from this basin
(Basin 6) during the July 22 storm.
B. St. Johns /Ashcroft Area: Results of the field survey of homes
indicated about 16 out of 42 residences in the St. Johns /Ashcroft area
had damage in their basements from water characterized as being
from the sanitary sewer. The following items may have contributed to
the extent of the problems in this area.
1. Analysis of Flow Metering Data
The St. Johns /Ashcroft area is located in Basin 10 and is served by
an 18 inch trunk sewer which passes through this basin. A
significant area of the City contributes flow to this sewer upstream
of the problem area. The 18 inch trunk sewer continues increasing
in size to 33 inch diameter before discharging into the City of
Richfield at 75th Street and Xerxes Avenue. Meter M -129 is
located at the point of discharge and measures all the flow from
Area B and Area C. The flow carrying capacity is estimated to be
2,050 gpm for the 18 inch and 8,135 for the 33 inch sewer.
Flow charts for the July 1 and July 22 storms were examined in
Chapter V. The peak flow measured at the meter on July 1 was
6,465 gpm. The meter reading for the July 22 storm reached a
64 11413
maximum of 7,800 gpm which was the maximum range of the
meter. The meter reading remained at a maximum for about 18
hours before it returned to measuring the actual flow. The actual
peak flow was estimated by comparing to a downstream meter (M-
130). The estimated peak flow is 9,500 gpm. As with meter 127,
the large peak flow experienced is identified as being generated by
inflow into the sewer system. The estimate of inflow for Areas B
and C during the July 22 storm is 5,240 gpm or 64 percent of the
33 inch sewer capacity. Area B inflow is an estimated 3,140 gpm.
The sewer system for Area B was able to convey the wastewater
generated during the July 1 storm. As indicated, the July 22 storm
caused some problems in the system.
2. Hydraulic Analysis
Hydraulic analysis of this area indicates surcharging conditions
would be expected under anticipated wet weather peak flow rates.
The control point for limiting total flow in this area is the 18 inch
diameter pipe located at St. Johns Avenue and Garrison Lane.
The capacity of this pipe is approximately 2,050 gpm and the
anticipated peak flow at this location is 2,915 gpm (142 percent of
capacity). Edina City personnel observed that sanitary manholes
on the lower part of Ashcroft Lane had flowing water to within 6
inches of the road surface during the July 22 storm event. The
crux of the hydraulic analysis was whether the flow rates
experienced during the July 22 storm could have been high enough
to create this level of surcharging.
There are three contributors to flow in the 33 inch diameter trunk
feeding Meter 129: the 24 inch trunk sewer serving most of Area B
(including St. Johns / Ashcroft), the 24 inch trunk serving Area C
and the miscellaneous feeder connections serving Basin 9. The
Area C 24 inch trunk has a maximum capacity of approximately
4,300 gpm as controlled by the pumping capacity of Lift Station 14.
The peak flow for Area B was estimated to be 5,200 gpm for the
July 22 storm.
Hydraulic profile analysis indicates a downstream flowrate of 5,000
gpm at the discharge of the 24 inch from Basin 10 would have
been necessary to create the surcharge elevation observed on
Ashcroft Lane. This flowrate compares to an estimated peak flow
for this sytem of about 3,600 gpm during the July storm.
The hydraulic profiles developed during this analysis showed
potential problems in the area of Mavelle Drive and Hazelton Road.
This area is as low relative to the depth of the sewer as the St.
65 11413
Johns /Ashcroft area. There were three complaints registered in this
area from the July 22 storm, but the source of the problems was
not determined.
A separate hydraulic profile analysis of the 18 inch St.
Johns /Ashcroft sewer and the downstream 21 inch indicates some
surcharge does occur in the 18 inch when the 21 inch is flowing at
capacity. The lowest basement levels in this area are only about 1-
2 feet above the top of the sewer. This would indicate some of the
homes in this area are at high risk of sewer back -ups during very
intense rains.
The hydraulic analysis at the estimated peak flows for the area do
not duplicate the very high surcharge observed in this area. This
would indicate high surcharge was likely not due to only
conveyance capacity. Other factors such as partial obstruction or a
localized high inflow would appear to be necessary to explain the
actual field condition.
3. Televised Sewer Survey
The TV survey of the sewers in this area did indicate some debris
in a couple of locations downstream of the St. Johns /Ashcroft area.
Both areas were near the Highway 62 crossing. The trunk sewer
downstream of Highway 62 to the Meter 129 location was not
televised so the condition of the remainder of this systems is not
known at this time.
4. Field Survey of Homes
The problems experienced in the St. Johns /Ashcroft area appear to
be different than the other two problem areas. The other two areas
had problems associated with isolated drainage areas serving only
a small area of the City. Possible explanations for the occurrences
in July were limited to items associated with only the affected area
or a small additional area that also contributed flow. However, the
majority of homes affected in the St. Johns /Ashcroft area were
directly connected to the 18 inch trunk sewer which serves a very
large area of the City upstream of St. Johns /Ashcroft. Any
explanation or possible solution to the problem needs to include all
areas that contribute flow to this main trunk sewer. Potential inflow
from sump pumps could be as high as 1,450 gpm from the portion
of Area B upstream of this location.
66 11413
5. Field Survey of Manholes
The St. Johns /Ashcroft area is very small compared to the total
area drained by the trunk sewer through Area B. A surrey of
manholes in the localized area would not provide representative
data for all manholes located in the drainage area. For this reason,
no manhole covers were field inspected in the St. Johns /Ashcroft
area.
6. Additional Factors Contributing to Sanitary Problems
Several factors may have contributed to the surcharging of the
sanitary system during the July 22 storm including the following:
a. The soils in the area were saturated with water from the earlier
July rains. This would tend to increase the problem of inflow
because nearly all of the rain would runoff or pond. Residents
of the area indicated heavy street flooding did occur on the
frontage road to Highway 62.
b. The amount of infiltration into the system was higher than would
normally be expected due to the wet conditions.
c. Basement sump pumps would have likely been operating during
the storm because of the antecedent saturated soil conditions.
Residents indicated during the field survey that sump pumps
were operating more or less continuously during this time.
d. A natural restriction exists in this portion of the system because
there is a section of 18 inch diameter pipe sandwiched between
21 inch diameter pipes (see Figure V -21). The conveyance
capacity throughout most of Basin 11 (upstream) is actually
greater than the conveyance capacity at this location in Basin
10. Please note, only the segment of 18 inch sewer from the
corner of Ashcroft and the Crosstown frontage road to the
corner of St. Johns and Garrison Lane is at a slope that causes
a conveyance bottleneck. The upstream 18 inch sewer has a
steeper slope that allows adequate conveyance.
e. A below ground parking facility in this area was reported to have
six inches of overland stormwater flooding on July 22. All of this
water drained to the sanitary sewer through floor drains
contributing a large amount of inflow to the system.
67 11413
7. Conclusions
The following items are identified the reasons for the problems in
the St. Johns /Ashcroft area:
a. High Inflow. Saturated soils from previous rains caused
increased inflow during the July 22 storm. Inflow quantity for
this area (Area B) is estimated to be 60 percent of the total peak
flow. Infiltration is estimated at 24 percent of the total flow while
the base sanitary flow was 16 percent.
Inflow sources identified include manhole covers, basement
sump pumps connected to the sanitary system, and basement
seepage discharge to floor drains.
b. Basement Elevations.
The minimum amount of elevation difference between the home
basements and the trunk sewer increases the risk of sanitary
sewer backups during very heavy rains.
c. Conveyance Capacity.
The conveyance capacity of the 18 inch sewer that takes
sanitary flow from this area and a significant area upstream is
less than the estimated peak flow at this location.
C. Limerick Area: Results of the field survey of homes indicated 9 out of
83 residents in the Limerick area had water problems in their
basements from water characterized as being from the sanitary sewer.
The survey showed an additional 31 percent of homes did have water
damage, but they were either sure the source was stormwater
seepage of some type or they were unsure of the source. The
following items may have contributed to the problems experienced in
this area.
1. Analysis of Flow Metering Data
The Limerick area is located in sewer Basin 18 and is served by a
9 inch diameter sewer. The 9 inch line discharges into a 12 inch
feeder sewer that serves the majority of Basin 18 before
discharging into the 15 inch trunk sewer at Valley View Road. The
Limerick area is an isolated area of homes served by a sewer with
no upstream contribution of wastewater flow. The discharge from
this area continues to follow Nine Mile Creek and eventually
68 11413
discharges by a 24 inch pipe into Pump Station 14. The discharge
from this pump station constitutes the flow generated by Area C.
Pump Station 14 has a flow meter that records the flow from this
entire area. The pump station has a capacity of 4,300 gpm.
The flow charts for the July 1 and July 22 storm were examined in
Chapter V. These records were examined to determine estimates
of infiltration and inflow from this service area. The flow chart for
the July 1 storm does not indicate any noticeable inflow. The flow
chart for the July 22 storm indicates the flow rate went to the
maximum capacity of the station and remained at this level for
about 18 hours. The estimated inflow quantity for the July 22 storm
was 2,100 gpm which is 49 percent of the total flow from this
service area. It is likely the actual peak flow was higher than the
pump station capacity but there is no good way to determine what
the peak may have been. If the flow into the pump station was
higher than the pumping capacity, the excess above 4,300 gpm
would have to be stored in the collection system sewers until it
could be pumped from the system.
2. Hydraulic Analysis
The methodology utilized for estimating the peak flow for the July
22 storm for just the isolated Limerick area of homes would result in
a peak flow from this area of only 50 gpm. The conveyance
capacity of the nine inch collector is about 450 gpm. The method
used to estimate the peak flow is likely not very accurate for a small
isolated area. No flow rate measurement is available for this area.
Eyewitness accounts of the actual field conditions during this storm
indicated surcharging of the Limerick area was occurring. This
would indicate that either the local sewer was flowing at capacity
(significant local inflow) or there was a problem downstream.
These accounts also indicated substantial stormwater ponding
adjacent to Highway 62. This ponding may have contributed to the
inflow volume.
3. Televised Sewer Survey
TV survey work in the Limerick area showed no major problems
with the structural integrity of the system. There was evidence of
some minor sources of joint leakage and some deposition of solids,
but nothing significant in regard to the physical condition of the
system.
69 11413
4. Field Survey of Homes
The field survey of homes showed a relatively large number of
homes had a sump pump discharge connection to the sanitary
system. Approximately 18 percent of all homes (15 of 83) in the
area had these connections compared to 7 percent for the overall
survey. An estimated flow from these sump pumps was estimated
by assuming each pump operated 50 percent of the time during the
July 22 storm at a 30 gpm pumping rate. The total flow would have
been approximately 225 gpm or half of the carrying capacity of the
local sanitary system.
5. Field Survey of Manholes
The manhole survey was conducted for all of Basin 18 including
the Limerick area. The results showed 97.5 percent of all manhole
covers had at least one pick or vent hole and the majority of
manholes had extensive asphalt cracking around the manhole
frame. Estimates of manhole inflow for Basin 18 range from a high
of 1,375 gpm to a low of 167 gpm during a high intensity storm.
6. Additional Factors Contributing to Sanitary Problems
Several factors may have contributed to the surcharging of the
sanitary system during the July 22 storm including the following:
a. The soils in the area were saturated with water from the earlier
July rains. This would tend to increase the problem of inflow
because nearly all of the rain would runoff or pond. Residents of
the area indicated heavy street flooding on Valley Lane and
also several yards were heavily ponded during the July 22
event.
b. The amount of infiltration into the system was higher than would
normally be expected due to the wet conditions.
c. There appears to be the potential for excessive inflow into this
system via sump pump discharges and manhole leakage into
the sanitary system. Residents reported basement sump
pumps were operating often during July due to the antecedent
saturated soil conditions.
d. The significant ponding of surface water from the storm caused
seepage into several area basements which would
consequently have been discharged into the sanitary system.
70 11413
7. Conclusions
The following are identified as reasons for the problems in the
Limerick Area:
a. High Inflow. Saturated soils from previous rains caused
increased inflow during the July 22 storm.
Inflow quantity for this service area (Area C) is estimated to be
49 percent of the total peak flow during the July heavy rains.
Infiltration is estimated at 25 percent of the total flow while the
base sanitary flow was 26 percent.
Inflow sources are identified as manhole covers, basement
sump pumps connected to the sanitary system, and basement
seepage discharge to floor drains.
Significant ponding of storm water in the area and subsequent
seepage into area basements would have also increased the
quantity of inflow that found its way into the sanitary sewer
system.
71 11413
VII Potential Problem Area Solutions
This study has evaluated the functioning of the existing sanitary sewer
system during a very intense rain storm that occurred on July 22, 1997.
Three specific problem areas were examined in more detail to determine
the reasons for the problems and to consider possible solutions and
improvements. This chapter will include consideration of possible problem
area solutions.
The most significant finding as to the reasons for the problems is inflow.
On a system wide basis the estimated quantity of rain induced inflow
amounted to 8,635 gpm or 59 percent of the estimated peak flow of
14,590 gpm during this storm. This peak flow compares to an average
daily flow of 5,205 gpm for the City.
Potential problem area solutions are presented in the following
paragraphs. Measures to reduce inflow will be the primary
recommendation of this report. Measures to accomplish inflow reduction
will be discussed in Chapter VIII. Other options fall into two distinct areas.
These are (1) measures to attenuate (or reduce the peak flow) and (2)
measures to increase conveyance capacity.
A. Measures to Attenuate Peak Flows:
As can be noted by the sewer flow hydrographs that are presented for
the July storm events, the problem of sewer backups occurs when the
sewer conveyance capacity is exceeded. One way to reduce this
problem is to reduce the peak flow. Two methods of reducing the
peak flow have been considered. One is storage and the other is by
diverting flow out of the particular service area.
1. Storage
This proposed system would provide a means of diverting the peak
flows from the sewer to a storage tank and then returning this flow
after the system flow has subsided. An example of this would be to
look at the flow chart for Meter 127 on July 1, 1997 (page 19). The
very high peak flow shown on this meter could be reduced to 3,000
gpm by the provision of 165,000 gallons of storage. Other storms
would have different hydrographs related to rain intensity and
duration. The required storage volume is very dependent on how
long the hydrograph stays high.
The sewer system that would be the best candidate for this solution
would be the 24 inch trunk sewer along Minnehaha Creek in
72 11413
Area A. The final design of a tank size would require a more
detailed study of the system.
The proposed system is a 250,000 gallon storage tank located at
Minnehaha Creek in Pamela Park. The tank would include a
pumping system to return the flow to the sewer. A budgetary
estimate of this system would be $500,000. This proposal is
shown in Appendix A.1.
2. Divert Flow From Service Area A
The concept here is to remove some of the service area
contributing flow to a problem system peak flow. If some
contributing area is removed _from an overall service area, the peak
flow should be reduced.
One of the problems with this kind of a project is that for the City of
Edina there is not really any capacity available to transfer flow from
one service area to another service area. During the July 22 storm
the flow from Area A exceeded the downstream sewer capacity
and the total flow from Area B and C was right at or above the
rated sewer capacity of this system. Additional conveyance
capacity would have to be located. The option being considered is
to connect to an additional MCES sewer in Richfield 1 RF -490. This
sewer currently takes sanitary sewage from Basin 3 in Edina. The
proposed system would divert the sanitary sewage from Basin 5 of
Area A and discharge to Basin 3. A combination of a new gravity
sewer, pump station, and forcemain could be configured as shown
in Appendix A.2. This flow diversion would divert an estimated
peak flow of 515 gpm. The estimated cost of this proposed project
is $650,000.
One other factor necessary for this concept is the beginning section
of the MCES sewer is too small at only 15 inches. Consequently, it
would also be necessary to upgrade the sewer size in the City of
Richfield for about 1,350 feet. This would add to the project cost
an estimated $250,000.
Lastly, it would be necessary to obtain approval from the MCES
and Richfield in order to implement this plan.
3. Divert Fairview Southdale Hospital
This proposal would redirect the flow from Fairview Southdale
Hospital from Area B to the MCES 1 RF -490 sewer. This would
divert an estimated peak flow of 200 gpm from Area B.
73 11413
This project would require a pumping station and forcemain to
redirect the discharge from the hospital to the east. The estimated
cost of this proposed project is $150,000. This proposal is included
as Appendix A.3.
B. Measures to Increase Conveyance Capacity
The concept considered here is to increase the conveyance capacity
of a particular area where there have been problems. These
measures also fall into two types of systems (1) measures to increase
the conveyance capacity from the City as a whole and (2) measures to
improve the conveyance capacity where a capacity limitation has been
identified.
Items 2 and 3 under A of this chapter also fall into the first type as
measures to increase capacity from the City.
The evaluation of the sewer system conveyance capacity to handle a
storm like the July 22 storm is presented in Chapter V. The particular
sewers identified as having capacity problems included the 12 inch
Tower/Woodcrest sewer and the 18 inch trunk at St. Johns /Ashcroft.
1. Tower/Woodcrest. It is proposed that the conveyance capacity
from this area could be increased by installing a 12 inch relief
sewer from Tower Street and Wooddale Avenue to the 24 inch
trunk at Minnehaha Creek. This proposed sewer is shown in
Appendix A.4. It is true this relief sewer will not increase the
overall Area A conveyance capacity. What it will accomplish is
lower the hydraulic profile from the Tower Street area to the
Minnehaha trunk. As long as the Minnehaha trunk has the
conveyance capacity and is not surcharged, this relief sewer
should reduce the risk of backups in this area. The estimated cost
of this relief sewer is $325,000.
2. St. Johns /Ashcroft. It is proposed that the conveyance capacity
from this area could be increased by installing a 21 inch sewer in
this area to replace the existing 18 inch as shown in Appendix A.5.
The concept is similar here to item 1 above in that the larger pipe
will lower the sewer hydraulic profile in the area where the home
basements are only about 1 -2 feet above the existing sewer. The
proposed system will reduce the risk of backups as long as the
downstream sewer has adequate conveyance capacity and /or does
not surcharge. The estimated cost for the replacement of 1,250
feet of sewer is $250,000.
74 11413
VIII Recommendations
Based upon the evaluation of the performance of Edina's sanitary sewer
system during the July 22 rain storm and the exploring of possible
solutions, recommendations for system improvement have been
developed. The estimated costs presented are considered budget type
estimates which would require additional evaluation to finalize. The
proposed recommendations are as follows:
A. Inflow Reduction Program
Rainfall induced inflow has been identified as the most significant
factor that contributed to the very high flows that occurred in the
sanitary sewer system on July 22. These very high flows were
responsible for the Area A system failure and for the other sewer
backups that occurred during the rainfall event.
If the quantity of inflow that finds its way into the sanitary sewer system
can be significantly reduced, the potential for sewer backups due to
heavy rainstorms can be mitigated. Consequently, it is recommended
the City undertake an aggressive program to reduce the inflow into the
sanitary sewer system. Other measures to improve or enhance the
system capacity have been presented for consideration. It should be
pointed out reduction of inflow is a must and should be accomplished
concurrently with the other proposed improvement projects.
The proposed inflow reduction program should include the following
measures:
1. A public education program should be implemented to instruct
citizens on the general operation of the sanitary sewer system and
how they can help to keep the system operating as designed.
Some important items would include:
a. Delineation of differences in the stormwater collection system
and the sanitary sewer system.
b. Instruction on the proper way to discharge their basement sump
pumps and foundation drains.
c. Inform citizens of the potential benefit of installing backflow
prevention valves on their sanitary sewer connection.
A properly informed citizenry can be helpful in reducing inflow on a
house by house basis. However, the benefits of this type of
program are difficult to predict.
75 11413
2. Establish a goal for inflow reduction. With inflow reduction it is very
difficult to predict the expected results. It would be great to be able
to say that if the City eliminated X number of sump pump
connections or replaced Y number of manhole covers a certain
quantity of inflow would be eliminated. Experience with these
programs indicates accurate predictions of reduction are just not
possible. Establishing a goal, on the other hand, should be
achievable and measures can be taken to continue until
accomplished.
A suggested goal would be 40 percent reduction of inflow in three
years. In terms of identified inflow for the July 22 storm, that would
be an overall City reduction of 3,450 gpm.
3. The existing City ordinance against discharge of basement sump
pumps into the sanitary sewer system should be enforced
throughout the City. Elimination of inflow from this source should
provide immediate and noticeable results in reducing the amount of
flow received during wet weather conditions such as those seen in
July. Several cities in Minnesota have dealt with the problem in
different ways and can be a source of information for Edina.
Consideration should be given to providing a drain pipe at the
street curb for sump pump discharge.
A City wide survey of all sanitary sewer connections should be
considered. The estimated cost of the survey is $400,000.
4. A program should be implemented to do a systematic replacement
of manhole covers throughout the City. The new covers would be
solid (without vent or pick holes) and would have a gasketed seal
between the lid and frame. New covers can be used with existing
frames. The program should identify manholes particularly suspect
to inflow such as those located in ponded areas during storms and
those with more than one hole in the cover. The most suspect
manholes should be replaced in the first stage of the program.
Consideration should also be given to providing chimney seals on
the top portion of manholes that are subject to ponding.
The estimated cost to replace all 4,750 manhole covers in the City
is about $500,000.
5. Selectively replace some of the older brick manholes that are
particularly vulnerable to surface ponding. Manholes constructed
of brick are more susceptible to leakage from both inflow and
infiltration. Replacement or sealing of these manholes could be
76 11413
beneficial in reduction of clear water leakage during intense rains.
The estimated cost to replace 50 manholes is about $100,000.
6. Continue to televise the entire sanitary sewer system to look for
problem areas that have potential for significant quantities of
infiltration and inflow. Priority should be given to the locations of
problems during the July 22 storm and to the entire trunk sewer
system. TV tapes should be reviewed for any possible
interconnections between the storm sewer system and the sanitary
sewer system. If any of the these types of connection exist, they
will contribute substantial amounts of inflow during heavy
rainstorms.
Items identified as clear water flows, displaced sewer joints, and /or
any broken pipe should be pursued to provide correction.
7. Identify locations on private property where flooding by storm water
is consequently discharged to the sanitary sewer system. During
the course of this study, a few specific locations have been
identified as having storm water flooding during the July 22 storm
that was discharged to the sanitary sewer system. Work out
modifications with the property owners to minimize the discharge.
B. Adopt a Program of Regular Blocking, Televising, and Cleaning of the
City's Trunk Sewers.
The current cleaning program is for the local collection sewers and
includes 12 inch trunk sewers. The TV survey, accomplished during
this study indicates the presence of various items of debris in the trunk
sewer that should be removed. The partial obstruction that affected
the Minnehaha trunk sewer indicates the presence of debris that
caused a problem. The nature of this obstruction is not known nor the
source. A program to keep the main trunk sewers clean should reduce
the risk of this type of obstruction.
The suggested program is to utilize a system which blocks off a
particular sewer section so it can be dewatered, run a television
through it and physically remove any debris or deposition that is found.
C. Construct the Tower/Woodcrest Relief Sewer.
The combination of the increased conveyance capacity from this area
and the reduction of inflow for the basin should mitigate the problems
this area has experienced with backups. The estimated cost is
$400,000.
77 11413
D. Construct Peak Flow Storage Tank.
The proposal is a 250,000 gallon concrete storage tank which would
provide storage of peak flows from the Minnehaha trunk sewer. The
tank would include a pumping station to return the stored flow to the
Minnehaha sewer when capacity is available. The estimated cost is
$500,000.
E. Modification of the St. Johns /Ashcroft Sewer.
The increase in the conveyance capacity for this area and the
reduction of inflow for Area B should mitigate the problems of sewer
backups this area has experienced. The estimated cost of this sewer
is $250,000.
It is suggested the City gather specific field elevations of the basement
elevation in this area to determine the relative elevations to the area
sewer. If the elevations are considered too close to the existing sewer,
consideration should be given to providing a new area collector with a
lift station so the collector sewer can be lowered adequately to mitigate
this problem area.
F. Consider Alternatives to Increase Conveyance Capacity from the City
This recommendation suggests further consideration of ways to
increase the total conveyance capacity from the City. There is an
MCES interceptor 1 RF -490 located in the northern part of Richfield
which may have additional capacity that could be utilized by Edina.
Items A.2 and A.3 described in Chapter VII are two example projects
which would provide additional system capacity. Diversion of the
eastern half of Basin 10 is another possible project. The projects
considered for this recommendation have an estimated cost range of
$150,000 to $900,000.
78 11413
APPENDIX A
Q Q
0 3
W Y
Y 0
O
56TH ST W i7
a
KELLOGG PL j
Y
0
O
O
-v
O
m
v
O
C)
m
D
Z
O
O
Z
W
J
Q
0
0
0
O
Q
WOODLAND RD
z
0
O
O
PHILBROOK LA
]I, --rllrin
J
Y
O
Q
d
1
SgTH `N
ST
WOODCREST DR
NEW ST RAGE TANK
(65'x658
L _ ry
LIFT STATION
2
0
z
g
0
0
O
3
t
N
=O
oos
�O
l
591 H ST W
W
00 Y
O c
Li
m a
TIE INTO EXISTING 10 "/18" x
u
60TH ST W Q
60TF
GRAVITY SEWER
61 ST T W
w w
Q �
¢
z > TIE INTO EXISTING LIFT
Y M� ODIFY LIFT STATION
Y o AS REQUIRED)
¢ w
0
Y� N �
4
4
FORCEMQ w 3 J A
IN „ 4 N -
J
CO HWY NO 62
c� c
ST W
V)
w
Q
N
w
0
w
>
¢
w
z
¢
z
¢
W
3
o
LA-
_
3
w
ui
loll
_
V
bUlH
N ..
0-
o
�i z
w "
CHOWEN
CUR
N
V)
w o
¢
a 9" m
w z
> w
¢ 9" 9" 3:
O
w N v Q U ro`L
�O
Z
w >
W
v � GO }
w ¢ �s
}
TI EXISTING z
S 1 RF -4. J
INCREASE SIZE OF °
MCES UNTIL REACHING
18" IN RICHFIELD
ST yy
24" Ln LL
g" > 2' 65TH ST W v)
w
?4 •. w Q
\-It r
APPENDIX A.
PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER
DIVERSION FROM BASIN 5 TO BASIN 3
Ln o
of
w o
¢
a 9" m
w z
> w
¢ 9" 9" 3:
O
w N v Q U ro`L
�O
Z
w >
W
v � GO }
w ¢ �s
}
TI EXISTING z
S 1 RF -4. J
INCREASE SIZE OF °
MCES UNTIL REACHING
18" IN RICHFIELD
ST yy
24" Ln LL
g" > 2' 65TH ST W v)
w
?4 •. w Q
\-It r
APPENDIX A.
PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER
DIVERSION FROM BASIN 5 TO BASIN 3
APPENDIX A.
PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER
DIVERSION FROM BASIN 5 TO BASIN 3
D
O
NT
D �
r0
�N
r m
o�
O D
Ord
N
_ Z X
Z
O
W -*�
56TH ST
Q
TOWER ST
LA
z
O
�tp
WEST WOODLAND
'clq
S�.
a a
U 3
O g
J y
Y O
W 56TH ST W
KELLOGG PL
— — — — — NEW 12" BYPASS SEWER
c-
0 m
0
Z
�
RD ^
N 0
O
m
N
� 0
J
ST W
O D
RD
M
V
O
(/,--;W67Cl5
�o
_z
z
O
rnn
a a
U 3
O g
J y
Y O
W 56TH ST W
KELLOGG PL
— — — — — NEW 12" BYPASS SEWER
1. PHILBROOK
J r
r (y
Y
Q
a
12 r
w
Q 56TH N
ST
3 W
w
Y '
O
O
w
m
WOODCREST DR
LA -.1 _ ..
IN
M
z
0
3
0
ENCASED z
o
RD ^
IN CONC.
J
1 3
o
RD
O
O
(/,--;W67Cl5
3
1. PHILBROOK
J r
r (y
Y
Q
a
12 r
w
Q 56TH N
ST
3 W
w
Y '
O
O
w
m
WOODCREST DR
LA -.1 _ ..
IN
M
z
0
3
WLb I �SHUKL DR
APPENDIX B
TKDA
ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS
CITY OF EDINA
HOUSESURVEY
Name
Address
Phone
1. Do you know if your home has a foundation drain
TOLTZ. KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON
AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
1500 PIPER JAFFRAY PLAZA
444 CEDAR STREET
SAINT PAUL. MINNESOTA 55101.2140
PHONE:612/292.4400 FAX:612/292.0063
6. Did you have any water problems during the
July rainstorms (July 1 -22)? Yes ❑ No ❑
An Equal Opportunity Employer Commission No. 11413
or footing drain tile?
Yes ❑
No ❑
Not Sure ❑
2.
If yes, do you know what it is connected to?
Yes ❑
No ❑
Not Sure ❑
Connected to?
3.
Do you know if your home has a basement
sump pump?
Yes a
No U
Not Sure ❑
4.
If yes or not sure - May I look at it?
Yes ❑
No U
Connected to?
5.
Do you know how much your sump pump
operated during the July rains (July 1 -22)?
Yes ❑
No ❑
Not Sure ❑
If yes - How often?
Often ❑
Half Time ❑ Infrequent ❑
6. Did you have any water problems during the
July rainstorms (July 1 -22)? Yes ❑ No ❑
An Equal Opportunity Employer Commission No. 11413
7. If yes - what was the source?
and how much water did you have?
8. Do you know if your home has a sanitary sewer
shut -off valve? Yes ❑ No ❑ Not Sure ❑
9. House gutters and downspouts. Yes ❑ No ❑
If yes, Discharge where ?,
Additional Notes:
APPENDIX C
A N I Y `i
I I
HENNEPIN COUNTY 4- MINNESOTA
RY
oT
S-,A N� I A SEWER
I<X 200 ID
t
4
MAP
ttl
7 4
197 6
1977
19 Y A
i970
084
mi 1
0 90 mi
1,30
r-
1,30 mi.
mi
I. �o MI.
i.50 mi
Al
s Mi
7.74
Mi. 1
7 74 Mi
7 4
M 1
7,74 11
7,74 N41.
7,77 mi,
T7 _7 M 1
7
7,7 K4 I
!.-1 '7
ik 1\4 i
13J6 Mi.
6.42
1
h11.
6 72 MI
81 MI.,;
6 94 MI.
7.90 MI.
8 79 ML
10 84 A,
1 1
98
11
Nfl I
-
113 50 W
�1
M,
1
;15.84 Mi
-1. 49 M I
119AI Mi.
119,82 mi,
o 0 M
j
120.02 ,A I
122,02 Mi
.15
5 2", e,
I"_
5,25 MI.
5 26 Mi,
526 MI
5,28 MI,
5 15 1,A,,
5,35 M i
12
523
7.70
Mi
NAI�
5.24 mi.
7.70 ML
7 7Ir,
7,70 ML
8 A I M 1.
8�32 w
8. 3M1.
9 t6 41
9
i 6
16 Mi
J9 mi.
,,
458
Mi
• 58 mi,
4,18
IM
458 Mi
4,58 M 1,
458 Mi.
4�58 MI,
1 91
A
('�
4.91 Mi-
0 17 Ml
4.91
0, 17 NA i
0 i7
,A 1
0, 17 1`4
O� 17 Mi.
0
0J7 NIL
O,i7 Ml�
0 17
Nil
. __
3 13 11
�A3
V 1,
3.13 M 1
3.113 Ni I
3.13 M1
3,13 ml�
3 13 P� 1
3,
3. 13 M
3 ,Vii.
mi
'G
2 86
2.86 ML
2,86 Mi.
_86 fv�,j
?
2 86
2
�3 6 1111''
2, 86 IIIIL
24"
za��
�12
!"�i�
Zze MI,
1
4, 9 2
N11'.
492 M I !
4�92 t-AL
4.92 M 1,
4,92 Mi
4,92
4
92
'1...12 MI i
33"-
4
C,
M3.
4 U2 w
0.8E Mi
C06
ML
0,8(, mi
0.86 MI,
0.86 ML
0
86
-8f-,ml
o 8 e, to I !
TOT L -
5 6 0
1, 15
8� -3Z Mi
P 4
V
161,16 M I
63, 5 6 - 1,
I M
166.68 Mi,
16 8� 51 MI,
171 .4 2 MI
171
)3
1
5 - 16 t-Al
wl A f� �i 0'r
5
�® t"!
D f3 ej
I`1� H, S
`VS MH§
4061 Mf4$
4141 MH�
45,9S N! F
464
'56MH'S
46
4675
m H . �S
I I
HENNEPIN COUNTY 4- MINNESOTA
RY
oT
S-,A N� I A SEWER
I<X 200 ID
t
4
MAP
ttl