HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004-08-03_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
AUGUST 3, 2004
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL
ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the
Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All
agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are
considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion
of such items unless a Commissioner, Council Member or citizen so requests it. In such cases
the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on
the Agenda.
* I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA - Regular Meeting of July 20, 2004.
II. ADJOURNMENT
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
SOLUTION OF APPRECIATION - VINCE BONGAARTS
* I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of July 20, 2004.
II. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS - Zoning Ordinances: First
Reading requires affirmative rollcall votes of three Council members except that a rezoning
from residential to non - residential requires four affirmative votes. Second Reading requires
affirmative rollcall votes of three of- Council to pass except rezoning froM residential -to non=
residential requires four affirmative votes. Waiver of Second Reading: Affirmative rollcall
votes of four members of Council to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property
Zoned Planned District: Affirmative rollcall vote of three Council members required
passing. Conditional Use Permit: Affirmative rollcall vote of three Council members
required to pass. Variance Appeal: Favorable rollcall of Council Members present to uphold
or deny appeal
* A. LOT DIVISION - 7000 Tupa Drive and 6909 St. Patrick's Lane - (John Wright and Joel
and Amy Anderson)
* B. SET HEARING DATE - AUGUST 17,2004:
1. PRELIMINARY REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT - 5125 49TH St. West
(Mark Jones/rhea Lucy Marshall)
2. PUBLIC HEARING - AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE - Floodplain
Regulations
Agenda/ Edina City Council
August 3, 2004
Page 2
III. ORDINANCES — First Reading: Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second Reading:
Favorable rollcall vote of three Council members to pass. Waiver of Second Reading:
Affirmative vote of four Council members to pass.
Rollcall A. ORDINANCE NO. 2004-10 - Second Reading Establishing a Municipal Dispensary
IV. REPORTS/ RECOMMENDATIONS
A. 44th and France Background Report
B. Municipal State Aid Sidewalk - 4809 to 4709 West 70th Street Imp. No. S -074
C. "Fall Into the Arts Festival" Wine and Beer Temporary Dispensary
D. Resolution No. 2004 -69 - Creating Minnehaha Watershed Partnership with
Various Public Agency Partners
V. FINANCE
* A. CONFIRMATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS As per Pre -List dated July 21,
2004, TOTAL $984,434.31; and July 28, 2004, TOTAL $536,363.78.
VI. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS
VII. CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
VIII. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES
IX. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL
X. MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEM
Tues
Aug 17
Budget Hearing 5:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Tues
Aug 17
Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Mon
Sep 6
LABOR DAY. HOLIDAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed
Tues
Sep 7
Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Tues
Sep 14
PRIMARY. ELECTION DAY - POLLS OPEN 7:00 A.M. UNTIL 8:00
P.M.
Tues
Sep 21
Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Tues
Oct 5
Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Tues
Oct 19
Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Mon
Nov 1
Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERF
Tues
Nov 2
GENERAL ELECTION DAY - POLLS OPEN 7:00 A.M. UNTIL 8:00
P.M.
Thur
Nov. 11
VETERANS DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed .
Tues
Nov 16
Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Thur.
Nov 25
THANKSGIVING DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed
Fri.
Nov 26
DAY AFTER THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY OBSERVED - City Hall
Closed
MINUTES
OF THE EDINA
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
HELD AT CITY HALL
JULY 20, 2004,
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Housh, Hovland, Masica and Chair
Maetzold.
CONSENT AGENDA APPROVED Motion
by Commissioner Hovland approving the
Redevelopment Authority as presented.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Masica, Maetzold
Motion carried.
made by Commissioner Housh and seconded
Consent Agenda for the Edina Housing and
*MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND
REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FOR JULY 6, 2004, APPROVED Motion made by
Commissioner Housh and seconded by Commissioner Hovland approving the minutes of
the regular meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority for July 6, 2004,
as presented.
Motion carried on rollcall vote — four ayes.
There being no further business on the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Agenda,
Chair Maetzold declared the meeting adjourned.
Executive Director
0
to
v � �o
lase
1888
RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION
WHEREAS, Vince Bongaarts began his career in Edina as a patrol officer for the Edina
Police Department in 1967 and continued as Traffic Safety Coordinator in 1996
following his retirement from public safety; and
WHEREAS, Vince Bongaarts has requested to retire from the Traffic Safety Coordinator
position effective August 2, 2004; and
WHEREAS, Vince Bongaarts. has worked above and beyond the position of Traffic
Coordinator, many times working well over the allotted part -time hours and giving this
time to the City of Edina; and
WHEREAS, Vince Bongaarts has been a model of customer service, working one -on -one
with residents and neighborhood groups; and
WHEREAS, Vince Bongaarts for more than three decades has exemplified the City's
mission of providing effective and valued public services, maintaining a sound public
infrastructure, offering premiere public services and guiding the development and
redevelopment of lands within the City, all in a manner that sustains and improves the
uncommonly high quality of life enjoyed by residents and businesses;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council, City staff and all
Edina residents hereby express their thanks and appreciation to
Vince Bongaarts
for his 36 years of work for the City of Edina.
Dated this 3rd day of August 2004.
Mayor Dennis F. Maetzold
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
HELD AT CITY HALL
JULY 20, 2004
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Housh, Hovland, Masica and Mayor
Maetzold.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Housh and seconded
by Member Hovland approving the Council Consent Agenda as presented with the exception
of Agenda Item W.A. Kitchen Renovation - Edina Senior Center.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Masica, Maetzold
Motion carried.
*MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF TULY 6, 2004, AND SPECIAL MEETING
OF TULY 6, 2004, APPROVED Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member
Hovland, approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Edina City Council for
July 6, 2004, and Special Meeting of July 6, 2004.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
ORDINANCE NO. 850 -A -25 ADOPTED GRANTING FINAL REZONING AND
RESOLUTION NO. 2004 -68 ADOPTED GRANTING FINAL PLAT APPROVAL TO
WALLINGFORD ADDITION (5101 WEST 70TH STREET) Affidavits of Publication were
presented and ordered placed on file.
Presentation by Planner
Planner Larsen stated the City Council approved Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Plat
approval for - Wallingford Addition at their April- 7,- 2004meeting. The approved plans c e
for 117 units in two, four story buildings. Mr. Larsen said the proponents have now
requested Final Rezoning and Final Plat.
Mr. Larsen noted the plans for the Final Rezoning and Final Plat reflect a reduction in total
unit count from 117 to 106. He explained that Building One designed as a rental unit would
contain 74 units; with Building Two, designed as a for -sale condominium would contain 32
units. Mr. Larsen said the final plans met the City's Code requirements for enclosed and
surface parking. However, using some surface spaces have been suggested as a proof of
parking to allow an increase in the green space.
Mr. Larsen said the proponent submitted the following plans: site plan, grading plan,
landscaping plan and schedule, and building elevations with materials. Mr. Larsen added
the only variance necessary, which had not changed since the preliminary approval was
granted, was for building setback along Metro Boulevard with the plan showing a 39 -foot
setback instead of the 49 feet required by City code. He concluded stating the proponents had
Page 1
I
Minutes/Edina City CounciOuly 20, 2004
agreed to provide a total of three (3) affordable housing units in the project, two in building
one and one in building two.
Mr. Larsen explained that the landscaping plan had been revised since the Planning
Commission meeting to include an extension of the berm on the north side of the property
and also the number of 12 -foot evergreen trees had been increased from seven to twelve.
Member Masica asked if reducing the ponds on the site from two to one would have any
impact upon wildlife. Mr. Larsen pointed out where the creek ran on the property and said
that the developer wanted to minimize the wetland impact so they requested reducing the
number of ponds.
Member Hovland asked a number of questions including:
• Staff's recommendation for bedroom sizes of affordable housing offered;
• Details of the Proof of Parking Agreement; .
• Potential terms and conditions of pond maintenance agreement;
• Was there concern about drainage; and
• Was staff satisfied with the proposed landscaping plan.
Mr. Larsen suggested the affordable units in the rental building be one 1- bedroom unit and
one 2- bedroom unit, with one 1- bedroom unit be affordable in the "for sale" condominium
building. He continued stating the proof of parking agreement would be the standard
agreement used with other developers. Engineer Houle stated the City would also use a
standard agreement to cover the pond maintenance and that based upon the submitted plans
drainage should not be a concern. Mr. Larsen concluded pointing out the proponents had
increased the number of large evergreens from seven to twelve and also agreed to extend the
berm to better screen the residential neighbors.
Member Housh asked what were the proposed average rents for the building. Mr. Larsen
explained he would defer to the developer to give the proposed rentals and price points of
Mayor Maetzold asked what kind of agreement would the City require to ensure the
affordable units were in place. Mr. Larsen pointed out a draft agreement that had been
included with the Council's packet, which would be modified to require documentation of
the developer either by copies of rental leases or sale documentation to ensure the
affordability of the promised units.
Member Hovland commented he believed the new plan presented a shorter profile to West
70th Street and he asked about the ability to maintain the privacy of residents of the
affordable units. Mr. Larsen explained that data would be covered under existing state data
practices statutes.
Vasco Bernardi, 5346 Poplar Circle, Bloomington, explained that the developer would like to
lessen the impact upon the wetlands and that was why they were attempting to reduce the
number of ponds. He added that rents in the project would be approximately $1.30 per
Page 2
Minutes/Edina City Council/Tuly 20, 2004
square foot or $1,000 and $1,300 per month depending upon the size of the apartment. He
said they feel the proposed project would be a good one for both themselves and the City of
Edina.
Timothy Nichols, 1788 Clear Water, Savage, stated he had been an advisor to the Bernardi's.
Mr. Nichols stated he had experience in developing affordable housing in a number of
communities. He requested that the focus of the affordable housing be put on the rental
housing and not to impose that condition on the condominiums. He suggested that more
people would be better served by not including the condominiums.
Mayor Maetzold commented that the Council could only react to the project in front of them
and would not get into any other method of addressing the affordable housing in the project
except that which had been agreed to by the applicant in writing and was before the Council.
Member Hovland said he hoped the developer could hold the condominium sale prices to
between $275,000 and $300,000 because there seemed to be a need for this type of housing in
Edina. He added he was excited about the affordable units and thanked the developer for
their cooperation in this area.
Member Housh asked if the Council could amend what they were granting at this meeting if
it were in the best interest of the City. Mr. Larsen stated that was a possibility.
Member Masica asked if the City would have oversight of the .affordable units. Mr. Hughes
stated that. would be part of the agreement between the City and the developer. Attorney
Gilligan explained the developer would have to file reports with the City showing their
compliance with the affordable units.
Public Comment
Alan Hohenstein, 5105 West 70th Street, expressed his concerns regarding the ponds and
- screening. - Mr. Hohenstein -asked -that the ponds have some type of aeration to avoid
stagnation. He asked that the developer be required to build a berm and plant it to totally
screen the new buildings from the residential neighbors.
Mr. Larsen explained that a portion of the proposed pond was intended to be a
sedimentation area where water would settle before discharging to the creek. He said he
would defer to the project architect to speak to the issue of the berm.
Todd Young, KKE, said there were two issues relating to the berm. He noted that West 70th
rises in elevation from east to west to the bridge on the edge of the project, while the property
itself naturally slopes to the creek. Mr. Young said there was not enough room to keep the
berm at the same height for the entire length of the property.
Member Masica said she thought the proposed screening was well done. She asked whether
the pond could be aerated and about the expense of doing so. Mr. Young said he was unsure
of the cost, he thought it could be done, but that maintenance would become an issue.
Page 3
Minutes/Edina City Council/iuly 20, 2004
Member Hovland asked, 1) if the pond would likely be dry unless there were very heavy
rains, 2) was there any plans to install a liner and, 3) would there be any need for fencing the
pond. Mr. Young replied that the pond would come into being with very heavy rains. Mr.
Hughes noted there was approximately an eight -foot change in elevation in the pond. Mr.
Houle explained that there was no plans for lining the pond and that this pond would most
likely be wet a good portion of the time because it was designed to settle out sediment. He
said there would be more danger from 9 Mile Creek and that ponds of this design were in
existence all over the City without problems.
Council Action
Member Housh made a motion to close the public hearing, seconded by Member Masica.
Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Masica, Mae tzold
Motion carried.
Member Housh made a motion granting Second Reading to the following ordinance
approval the Final. Rezoning subject to: 1) Watershed District permits; 2) Maintenance
agreement covering pond outlets; 3) Landscaping plan and bond to include re- vegetation
plan around storm water ponding areas; 4) Proof of Parking Agreement, and 5) Provision
for two affordable rental housing units in Building One (1 one - bedroom and 1 two -
bedroom) and one affording "for- sale" housing unit in the condominium building Two.
The affordable units to be subject to Metropolitan Council Standards for income and
affordability:
ORDINANCE NO. 850-A-25
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 850)
BY REZONING PROPERTY TO
PLANNED RESIDENCE DISTRICT - 4
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Subsection 850.06 of Section 850 of the Edina City Code is amended by adding
the following thereto:
-- -
---The extent-of-the Planned- Residence - District -4; P-RD- 4 is- enlarged-by the _addition-of- the - -. -.-
following described property:
Lot 1, Block 1, METRAM 1sT ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof,
Hennepin County, Minnesota.
The extent of the Planned Residence District 3 PRD -3 is reduced by removing the property
described above.
Section 2. Effective Date: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon adoption
and publication according to the law.
Adopted this 201h day of July, 2004.
First Reading- April 7, 2004
Second Reading. July 20, 2004
Published: August 4, 2004
Attest
Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk
Member Masica seconded the motion.
Rollcall:
Page 4
Dennis F. Maetzold, Mayor
Minutes/Edina City CounciViuly 20, 2004
Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Masica, Maetzold
Motion carried.
Member Housh made a motion introducing the following resolution and moving its
adoption granting Final Plat to Wallingford Addition subject to: 1) Watershed District
permits; 2) Maintenance agreement covering pond outlets; 3) Landscaping plan and bond
to include re- vegetation plan around storm water. ponding areas; 4) Proof of Parking
Agreement, and 5) Provision for two affordable rental housing units in Building One (1
one - bedroom and 1 two- bedroom) and one affording "for- sale" housing unit in the
condominium building Two. The affordable units to be subject to Metropolitan Council
Standards for income and affordability:
RESOLUTION NO. 2004-64
FINAL PLAT - WALLINGFORD ADDITION
5101 WEST 70TH STREET
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that
certain plat entitled, "WALLINGFORD ADDITION platted by The Wallingford
Partnership L.L.P., a Minnesota limited liability partnership, Sentinel Holding Company
an S Company and Antonio Bernardi and Maria Cecilia Bernardi, husband and wife, and
presented at the regular meeting of the City Council on July 20, 2004, be and is hereby
granted final plat approval.
Adopted this 20th day of July 2004.
Member Masica seconded the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Masica, Maetzold
Motion carried.
*HEARING DATE SET OF AUGUST 17 2004 AMENDMENT TO ZONING
ORDINANCE FOR FLOODPLAIN REGULATIONS Motion made by Member Housh and
seconded by Member Hovland setting August 17, 2004, as hearing date for Amendment to
Zoning Ordinance for Floodplain Regulations.
-- - -- -
Motion carried on rollc _ =our- ayes. - -- ------------ - - - - -- - --- - - - - -- - ----- - - - - -- -- - - -
FIRST READING GRANTED TO ORDINANCE NO. 2004 -10 ESTABLISHING A
MUNICIPAL DISPENSARY AND RESOLUTION NO. 2004 -65 - ESTABLISHING
LOCATIONS FOR MUNICIPAL DISPENSARIES Mr. Hughes suggested the Council hear
both the proposed ordinance establishing a municipal dispensary and the proposed
resolution establishing locations of such dispensaries at the same time.
Mr. Hughes stated the staff had previously advised the Council that State Liquor Control felt
the City could not issue itself a wine license and instead had to establish a municipal
dispensary instead. He said that based upon that interpretation of state law, staff had
prepared. an ordinance establishing a municipal dispensary and a corresponding resolution
establishing Braemar Golf Course as a dispensary serving wine, intoxicating malt liquor and
3.2 beer with Fred Richard Golf Course serving 3.2 beer.
Page 5
Minutes/Edina City Councilffuly 20, 2004
Following a brief discussion Member Masica made a motion granting First Reading of
Ordinance No. 2004 -10, establishing a municipal dispensary. Member Hovland seconded
the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Hovland, Masica, Maetzold
Nays: Housh
Motion carried.
Member Hovland introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption subject to
Ordinance No. 2004 -10 being adopted, seconded by Member Masica:
RESOLUTION No. 2004 -65
WHEREAS, the City of Edina by Ordinance No. 2004 -10 permits the establishment
of municipal dispensaries of liquor within the City of Edina.
. I NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Edina,
that on -sale dispensaries for liquor shall be established and limited as described below:
1. Braemar Golf Course Grounds and Clubhouse - limited to the on -sale of 3.2
beer, intoxicating malt liquor and wine; and
2. Fred Richards Golf Course Grounds and Clubhouse - limited to the on -sale
of 3.2 beer.
Passed and adopted this 20th day of July 2004.
Ayes: Hovland, Masica, Maetzold
Nays: Housh
Motion carried.
AWARD OF BID FOR KITCHEN RENOVATION - EDINA SENIOR CENTER Member
Hovland asked removal of the Edina Senior Center kitchen renovation from the Consent
Agenda to publicly commend Bob Seeger and the Edina Morningside Rotary Clubs, both
noon and morning, for their commitment of funds in the amount of $20,000 to aid in the
renovation of the Edina Senior Center kitchen. The total amount of the project would be
approximately $48,000.
Member Hovland made a motion approving the award of bid for the kitchen renovation at
the Edina Senior Center to recommended low bidder, Shaw Lundquist in the amount of
$20,880.00. Member Housh seconded the motion.
Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Masica, Maetzold
Motion carried.
FRONT OFFICE EXPANSION - EDINBOROUGH PARK Manager Hughes explained that
"Adventure Peak" the new playground park at Edinborough Park was a huge success
necessitating the expansion of the office lobby to accommodate customers. The bid exceeded
the budgeted amount of $15,000 in the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and therefore was
not placed on the consent agenda. The CIP in total was under budget.
Member Masica made a motion approving the award of bid for Edinborough Park's front
office expansion to recommended low bidder, Rutledge Construction at $18,440.00.
Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Masica, Maetzold
Page 6
Minutes/Edina City Council/Tuly 20, 2004
Motion carried.
*TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW OF JULY 7, 2004, APPROVED Motion made by
Member Housh and seconded by Member Hovland approving the Traffic Safety Staff
Review of July 7, 2004, Section A.:
1. Post a "NO PARKING" zone along the north edge of Belmore Lane at the end
of the alley between Washington Avenue and Adams Avenue;
and Section B. and C.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
RESOLUTION NO 2004 -66 —APPOINTING PRIMARY ELECTION JUDGES Member
Housh introduced the following resolution, seconded by Member Hovland and moved its
adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 2004-66
APPOINTING ELECTION JUDGES
FOR THE SEPTEMBER 14, 2004
PRIMARY ELECTION
WHEREAS, Minnesota Election Law 204B.21 requires that persons serving as
election judges be appointed by the Council at least 25 days before the election.
BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that the individuals named on Exhibit
A, and on file in the office of the City Clerk be appointed as election judges for the
primary election to be conducted on September 14, 2004, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is with this, authorized to make
any substitutions or additions as deemed necessary.
Passed and adopted by the Edina City Council this 20th day of July, 2004
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
*RESOLUTION NO 2004 -67 - SETTING HEARING DATE OF AUGUST 17, 2004 -
ALLEY VACATION (308 BLAKE ROAD) Member Housh introduced the following
resolution seconded by Member Hovland and moved its adoption:
- - -- - - -- - -- - - - - -- - RESOL --U-T- ION- N0.2004 -67- - - -- -- --
CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON VACATION
OF PUBLIC ALLEY RIGHT -OF -WAY
ADJACENT TO 308 BLAKE ROAD
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina as follows:
1. It is hereby found and determined that the following described property should be
considered for vacation in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes,
Section 160.29 and 462.348, Subd. 7:
2. This Council shall meet at 7:00 P.M. on the 17TH day of August, 2004, for the purpose of
holding a public hearing on whether such vacation shall be made in the interest of the
public.
3. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to cause notice of said hearing to be
published once a week for two weeks in the Edina Sun - Current, the official newspaper
of the City, to post such notice, in at least three public and conspicuous places, as
provided in Minnesota Statutes. Such notice shall be in substantially the following
form:
(Official Publication)
Page 7
Minutes/Edina City Council/iuly 20, 2004
CITY OF EDINA
4801 WEST 50TH STREET
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON
VACATION. OF ALLEY RIGHT OF WAY
ADJACENT TO 308 BLAKE ROAD
IN THE CITY OF EDINA
HENNEPIN COUNTY MINNESOTA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota will
meet on August 17, 2004, at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers at 4801 West 50th Street for
a portion of White Oaks Road roadway right -of -way easements to be vacated:
PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PORTION OF ALLEY RIGHT -OF -WAY TO BE
VACATED:
That part of the sixteen -foot alley adjacent to and between Lots 2,3,8 and 9, Block 4 of
Mendelssohn, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Said vacation lies north of the south line of the north 30 feet of said Lot 8 and south
of the north line of said Lots 2 and 9.
All persons who desire to be heard with respect to the question of whether or not the
above proposed street right of way and utility and drainage vacation is in the public
interest and should be made shall be heard at said time and place. The Council shall
consider the extent to which such proposed street vacation affects existing easements
within the area of the proposed vacation and the extent to which the vacation affects the
authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling electric,
telephone or cable television poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or water pipes, mains,
and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacation, to continue maintaining the
same or to enter upon such easement area or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair,
replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereto, for the purpose of specifying, in any such
vacation resolution, the extent to which any or all of such easement, and such authority to
maintain, and to enter upon the area of the proposed vacation, shall continue.
-- - —BY- ORDER- OF -T-HE -EDINA CITTY- COUNCIL - - - -- - - - --
Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk
Dated: July 19, 2004
Passed and adopted this 20th day of July 2004.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
MUNICIPAL STATE AID SIDEWALK - 4809 TO 4709 WEST 70TH STREET -
IMPROVEMENT NO. S -074 Engineer Houle explained the subject area was one of the
missing segments of sidewalks located on Municipal State Aid (MSA) roadways. Staff has
been working on plans for the missing sidewalk along the southerly side of West 70th Street
from the east property line of Arneson Acres Park to the east TH100 frontage road. The
proposed sidewalk will provide a safe east -west pedestrian movement along the south side
of West 70th Street from the frontage road to West Shore Drive and beyond.
Mr. Houle indicated the Council initiated the 2003/2004 Municipal State Aid Sidewalk Study
and the 2004 -2008 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for the entrance at Arneson Acres
Page 8
Minutes/Edina City Council/iuly 20, 2004
Park. Residents in the area were recently informed of the proposed project. Some affected
property owners indicated concern with the project. The total estimated project cost was
$113,000 and would be funded thought the Municipal State Aid System funds and the
revolving fund as approved in the CIP. If the project was deemed worthy by. the Council, a
resolution approving the West 70th Street Sidewalk Improvement, Improvement No. S -074,
would need adoption, authorizing plans and specifications to. be completed and bids taken.
Mr. Houle added that a small piece of easement on the westerly end of the subject location
was acquired in order to complete the sidewalk installation. When a local roadway reaches
approximately 750 trips per day, sidewalk installation was recommended to separate
pedestrians from vehicles. He explained that the placement of mailboxes in the area does not
lend themselves to a curb -style sidewalk. The actual sidewalk would be installed directly
behind the mailboxes yet within the right -of -way with the intent of minimizing tree loss.
Member Masica asked how many feet of boulevard would be used with installation of the
sidewalk. Mr. Houle said approximately nine feet would be used. The City would have a 4 -5
foot grassy strip and a five -foot sidewalk. City crews plow and maintain sidewalks on the
State Aid routes with equipment that accommodates the five -foot width. Ms. Masica inquired
how many feet of easement would be required for a curb -style sidewalk. Mr. Houle
responded that a six inch drop -off would be required with that style of sidewalk and isn't
user friendly for sight - challenged or persons in a chair. Ms. Masica asked what portion of the
$113,000 was the Arneson Acres project. Mr. Houle said approximately $25,000 -.$30,000.
David Hamilton, 4805 West 70th Street, spoke to.. his letter of June 16, 2004, stating his
disapproval of the project for various reasons. He stated the nature of this type of project
should not be done without consultation. He noted that sidewalk installation at nine feet into
his property was ominous and getting into his 'personal space'. He asked that this plan not
go forward.
- - -- - - - -- Donald Barck,-- 4807- West- -70t-h- Street,- a-- signer._of -the -previously _mentioned _ -Tune . 16,_2004,
letter; stated he has been through a lot in his 42 years on 70th. Street. While he knows that his
physically challenged neighbor would enjoy the ability to get to the park and beyond, he
noted that sidewalks were not a thing of beauty. He asked that the three lots at 4801, 4805
and 4807 be made exempt from the sidewalk project as the area does not warrant the
installation and install it on the Arneson Park side of 70th.
Ruth Johnson, 4809 West 70th Street, commented that her husband was in favor of the
sidewalk as was she.
Member Masica asked if there were a lot of walkers going to Christ Presbyterian Church. Mr.
Barck remembered when the church was expanding their parking lot, there was talk of NO
PARKING on 70th Street. As soon as the expansion was completed parking on 70th was
constant as well as a shuttle from the Arneson Acres parking lot. Ms. Masica concluded by
saying that installation of sidewalks was a matter of safety.
Page 9
Minutes/Edina City Council/Tuly 20, 2004
Mr. Houle added that curb style versus boulevard style could be installed if the US Post
Office boxes would be eliminated from the area. He indicated that bids could be solicited for
both curb styles. He stated his preference for a boulevard style because it separates the
pedestrians from traffic.
Member Hovland stated his preference for a boulevard style sidewalk being installed on
West 70th Street. After installation, use will increase, especially as a means to traverse to the
park.
Member Housh indicated this sidewalk would be a tremendous benefit to the three property
owners that was installed with State Aid funds and maintained by the City. He suggested
tabling the issue for two weeks fo gain a consensus from the neighborhood.
Member Masica concurred with installation of the sidewalks.
Following a brief discussion, Member Hovland moved to continue the Municipal State Aid
Sidewalk, Improvement No. S -074, (4809 to 4709 West 70th Street) to August 3, 2004,
directing staff to study options for mail delivery and types of sidewalk. Member Housh
seconded the motion.
Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Masica, Maetzold
Motion carried.
*CHANGE ORDER APPROVED - VALLEY VIEW ROAD AND WEST 66TH STREET
POND DREDGING - CONTRACT NO. 03 -6 (ENGINEERING) Motion made by Member
Housh and seconded by Member Hovland authorizing the change order for Valley Road
and West 66th Street Pond Dredging Improvements, Contract No. 03 -6 Engineering.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE REVIEW PROCESS APPROVED Mr. Hughes explained
---staff-discussed -alternatives for studying the City's subdivision ordinance during the recently
enacted moratorium. A number of options were possible for conducting the study and
preparing recommendations:
To refer this issue to the Planning Commission and suggest the Commission establish
a committee comprising Commission members to undertake the study
• The Council could refer this issue to the staff for review and recommendation
• To engage a consultant to undertake an independent review and prepare a report with
recommended ordinances for consideration
• To appoint a task force of residents who have an expertise in fields related to
development/ redevelopment for their independent review and recommendations as
to subdivision policy
Mr. Hughes said after discussing the options, staff believes the last option was most
appropriate for the task. A small . task force comprising residents with backgrounds in
architecture, law, property appraisal, planning, real estate and similar professions would be '
suited to provide recommendations for Council consideration. Staff believes that appointees
Page 10
Minutes/Edina City Council/iuly 20, 2004
must not be directly affected by any pending or contemplated subdivisions. Staff resources to
the committee would be provided by the Planning Department.
Mr. Hughes suggested the task force be charged with the following:
• Review subdivisions approved in recent years pursuant to the existing ordinance
• Evaluate the impact of these subdivisions on the character, symmetry and property
values in their neighborhoods
• Review subdivision ordinances of other similar communities
• Recommend changes to our ordinance if warranted
The goal of the task force would be to complete their work and report to the Council by years
end. He added that names of recommended potential individuals to serve on the task force
could be presented at the next Council meeting.
Member Hovland indicated his preference with two suggestions, 1) engaging a consultant
and 2) appointing a task force of expert residents. Mayor Maetzold concurred with the
suggestion.
Member Masica inquired whether an outside consultant would have access to other
communities' ordinances. Mr. Hughes noted that an outside consultant would have a greater
ability to do this type of research. Ms. Masica said she wished the study could be examined
by the Planning Commission, staff and back to the Council.
Member Housh explained he was in favor of a consultant being involved in the process. He
added that his hope was that anything that was troubling the Planning Commission with
their ability to enforce the ordinances, could be part of the task force study.
Mr. Hughes said the most time- consuming part of this process would be to get proposals
back from consultants. He stated that this could be back on the Council agenda for the second
- - -- -- -- meeting in- August. - --
Member Hovland made a motion directing staff to receive proposals from consultants and
present interested, qualified residents who would be willing to serve on a task force that
would examine the City of Edina's Subdivision Ordinance and be back for approval by
the Council on August 17, 2004. Member Housh seconded the motion.
Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Masica, Maetzold
Motion carried.
GREATER SOUTHDALE AREA STUDY PROCESS APPROVED Mr. Hughes indicated
that the Hennepin County Board has approved a cost sharing agreement and the planning
study with respect to the Greater Southdale area is underway. Kick -off meetings with
consultants have taken place and a planning process will go forward over approximately the
next eight months.
Three committees will assist in the study:
Page 11
Minutes/Edina City Council/f my 20, 2004
No formal Council action was taken.
*CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Member Housh made a motion and Member
Hovland seconded the motion approving payment of the following claims as shown in
detail on the Check Register dated July 7, 2004, and consisting of 32 pages: General Fund
$320,627.96; Communications Fund . $4,997.11; Working Capital Fund $57,590.70;
Construction Fund $543.14, Art Center Fund $2,065.56; Golf Dome Fund $1,286.47; Aquatic
Center Fund $7,468.14, Golf Course Fund $21,088.56; Ice Arena Fund $30,015.28;
Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fund $25,389.40; Liquor Fund $220,639.09, Utility Fund
$54,380.20; Storm Sewer Fund $6,157.86; Recycling Fund $32,171.80; PSTF Fund $726.87
TOTAL $785,148.14; and for approval of payment of claims dated July 14, 2004, and
consisting of 32 pages: General Fund $220,281.69, Communications Fund $1,739.50;
Working Capital Fund $164,310.36; Art Center Fund $2,188.35; Golf Dome Fund $129.65;
Aquatic Center Fund $25,457.69; Golf Course Fund $44,283.67; Ice Arena Fund $5,652.44;
Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fund $7,679.36; Liquor Fund $131,545.20; Utility Fund
$34,958.80, Storm Sewer Fund $1,142.47, Recycling Fund $3,122.15; PSTF Agency Fund
$4,463.76; TOTAL $646,955.09.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT (CAFR) FOR 2003 RECEIVED
Director Wallin presented Edina's Comprehensive Annual Financial Statement (CAFR) for
2003 and commented that again this year, no management letter was received from the
Auditors with concerns or suggested changes to the City of Edina's financial system. The
format of the 2004 CAFR is somewhat different because of changes brought about by GASB
34 the new Federal Accounting System.
Following a brief Council discussion, positive Council acclimation of the Financial/ Audit
process were given, and Member. Hovland made a motion approving receipt of the
Comprehensive Annual Financial Statement (CAFR) for 2003, as presented. Member
Housh seconded the motion.
Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Masica, Maetzold
Motion carried.
There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Maetzold declared the
meeting adjourned at 9:55 P.M.
City Clerk
Page 13
I
Consent Item II. A.
LOCATION MAP
Case Number: LD -04 -6
Location: 7000 Tupa Dr & 6909 St. Patrick's Lane
Request: Lot Division
DRAFT MINUTES PC MEETING JULY 28, 2004
LD -04 -6 John Wright, 7000 Tupa Drive
Joel and Amy Anderson, 6909 St. Patrick's Lane
Mr. Larsen informed the Commission the proponents are requesting to
transfer a part of an existing Outlot from the St. Patrick's Lane lot to the Tupa
Drive lot. The parcel measures approximately 40 feet by 87 feet. The parcel is
part of a steep hillside, sloping from north to south.
Mr. Larsen concluded staff recommends approval.
Commissioner Workinger questioned if Outlots are taxed differently from
"regular lots ". Mr. Larsen responded they are taxed differently. Outlots are
considered "unbuildable" and are taxed to reflect that.
Commissioner Swenson moved to recommend lot division approval.
Commissioner Fischer seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried.
04/16
Regular Meeting of the
Edina Planning Commission
Wednesday, July 28, 2004 7:00 PM
Edina City Hall Council Chambers
4801 West 50th Street
Case File:
LD -04 -6
Location:
7000 Tupa Drive, and
6909 St. Patrick's Lane
Applicant:
John Wright
7000 Tupa Drive
Owners:
John Wright, 7000 Tupa Drive, and
Joel and Amy Anderson, 6909 St. Patrick's Lane
Request:
Transfer a part of an existing Outlot from the St. Patrick's Lane lot to the Tupa
Drive lot. The parcel measures approximately 40 feet by 87 feet. The parcel is
part of a steep hillside, sloping from north to south.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval. Outlots are by definition unbuildable. Therefore no
new development rights are implied. The parcel will be a positive addition to the
Tupa lot without damaging the use of the St Patrick's lot
Planning Department Request
We, the residents of 7000 Tupa Drive, are asking the Planning Department of the
City of Edina for permission to acquire a portion of an outlot that belongs to Joel and
Amy Anderson, the residents of 6909 St. Patrick's Lane.
This outlot is uniquely described as its own entity and with a distinct property
identification of 06- 116 -21 -44 -0055. The two parties involved have not yet discussed
a purchase price or transaction date but certainly hope to do so after the Planning
Department has granted us permission to move forward.
The attached legal description from land surveyor Frank Cardarelle specifies which
section of the outlot we are referring to. The portion of the outlot that is not
described will remain the property of Joel and Amy Anderson of 6909 St. Patrick's
Lane.
We have also included the relevant Hennepin County records to assist you in this
process. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 952 -943-
1446.
Thank you for your attention to this situation and we look forward to hearing from
you!
FRANK R. CARDARELLE
(612) 941 -3031
Land Surveyor
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
Ctrtilitaft Of f urtq
Survey For John Wright Book Page File S4 83
7000 Tupa Drive
Edina
Scale:l " =30'
r8/ 9719
North line of South
210 feet, Outlot 1
d
' 9
North line of Outlot 1
0
South line of North
50 feet of Outlot 1
I 20 I
41. D
Existing House O
No. 7000
2 ,6
No . 70041
Z¢.S 6
B.
E �✓ /YF
/
E
1A q
f M
W — . 1
Description: The East
?3, S
87.19 feet of that
6o '4 op�q part of Outlot 1, Elm
12:7 View 1st Addition
lying South of the
North 50.0 feet there -
TUPA DRIVE of, and lying North
of the South 210.0
feet thereof.
Together with Lot 7,
Block 1, Braemar Hills
Fifth Addition.
IMrobyar*nvrdd.a•vu tr odvmwtr.pr..wddmofaunwdtlrbvxmwd above described ar&�'e
Hr.W* cm*, MkWa.h nd tlr N..tlm da Q •� v hmwb,tlr.M m..W Ivd
s,,,,,.v.d by m. a, dd. 1 6th d.y m J u 1 v 2004
C___;.0
Frank R. Cardarelle
State Reg. No. 6508
WILLIAM D. SCHOELL
REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER
MILAN. NO. 2263
SO. OAK 733
WIS. NO. E-6176
FLORIDA .NO. 6271
NO. OAK. 622
MONT. NO. fS16 -E
�W CAW
.. A.
1 J
copll�
SCHOELL - & MADSON, INC.
ENGINEERS a SURVEYORS
30 MONTH AVENUE SOUTH
HOPKINS. MINNESOTA
PHONE:
938.7601
CERTIFICATE OF-SURVEY
v vo %# G5'-y. -7 `-
CARLISLE MADSON
REGISTERED LAND SURVETO
HIM"- NO. 4374
SO. OAK. 791
MIS. NO. 6-674
IOWA NO. 3706
NO. OAK. I son
WONT. NO. 2742-0
FOR. Jrj&4rjqs CD/VS7''h'llCi' /OJT/ C�
._ _139_ /9 --
t9l;r31
30
t air
O�lVE
3o B %ac.(fo,�
BENCHMAA7. --
ToP o/' f/yd. on �cnirsar:
coi-rz,er 4,1- Zo/- 7
/terra Orn�/7?)
�/ e - Oerrofes ii�/r /r�cvne/rf set
O-LZ -/mss hr •/77,0/7( /72L -V7f /,ounce
- �- Oe/�ofes wood stake
# - Z;Im7oles hydrzr/rf
IY�, . � x�g927J - o�nv�'es exsf_ e %i
f IJ 0� �
3
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF A SURVEY OF THE
BOUNDARIES OF.
Got 7, B /a1,� 1, Brae/rrar- H %�s Fif�i Addii�iorr
AND OF THE LOCATION OF ALL BUILDINGS. IF ANY. THEREON. AND ALL VISIBLE ENCROACHMENTS. IF
ANY. FROM OR ON SAID LAND.
AS SURVEYED BY ME THIS 2'S DAY OF �Gt�y 19 7Z
It also shows the /ovation
of fhe
a P/-o�aos� bui /dhy.
MCEIVED II�ItE t$. iRr,NOSURVEYOR
APPR,0'
Bl JILDING NSP CTOR
MILL AGE OE-WINA
�/ e - Oerrofes ii�/r /r�cvne/rf set
O-LZ -/mss hr •/77,0/7( /72L -V7f /,ounce
- �- Oe/�ofes wood stake
# - Z;Im7oles hydrzr/rf
IY�, . � x�g927J - o�nv�'es exsf_ e %i
f IJ 0� �
3
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF A SURVEY OF THE
BOUNDARIES OF.
Got 7, B /a1,� 1, Brae/rrar- H %�s Fif�i Addii�iorr
AND OF THE LOCATION OF ALL BUILDINGS. IF ANY. THEREON. AND ALL VISIBLE ENCROACHMENTS. IF
ANY. FROM OR ON SAID LAND.
AS SURVEYED BY ME THIS 2'S DAY OF �Gt�y 19 7Z
It also shows the /ovation
of fhe
a P/-o�aos� bui /dhy.
MCEIVED II�ItE t$. iRr,NOSURVEYOR
�1��1�
ow e
AGENDA ITEM: II.B.
SET HEARING DATE -
AUGUST 17, 2004
AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE -
FLOODPLAIN REGULATIONS
and
PRELIMINARY REZONING/
PRELIMINARY PLAT —
5125 49TH STREET WEST
(Mark Jones /Thea Lucy Marshall)
Z No packet data
F-1 Oral presentation
F-1 Information coming
im
• l�.r vim•
REPORURE C OMMENDATI ON
To:
MAYOR AND COUNCIL
Agenda Item
III.A.
From:
GORDON L. HUGHES
Consent
El
CITY MANAGER
Information Only
❑
Date:
AUGUST 3, 2004
Mgr. Recommends
El
To. HRA
®
To Council
Subject:.
ORDINANCE. NO. 2004-10
❑
Motion
ESTABLISHING A
❑
Resolution
MUNICIPAL DISPENSARY
®.
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
RECOMMENDATION:
Grant Second Reading. -
INFORMATION/BACKGROUND:
The City Council granted First Reading of the subject Ordinance at the July 20,
2004, meeting. Staff recommends Second Reading.
1
ORDINANCE NO. 2004-10
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SUBSECTIONS 900.02, 900.03 and 1230.02
OF THE CITY CODE — MUNICIPAL LIQUOR DISPENSARY
The City Council of the City of Edina ordains:
Section 1. Subsection 900.02 of the City Code is amended to read as follows:
11900.02 Off -Sale Limited to Municipal Liquor Stores; Dispensary Established. No
intoxicating liquor, intoxicating malt liquor or wine shall be sold, or caused to be sold at off -sale
within the City by any person, or by any store or establishment, or by any agent or employee of
such person, store or establishment, except by the City and on the premises in the City occupied
by the municipal liquor dispensary for the off -sale of liquor and wine. There is hereby
established a municipal liquor dispensary for the off -sale and on -sale of liquor and wine. The
dispensary shall be located at such suitable places in the City as the Council determines by
resolution.
Subd. 1 Off -Sale Dispensary. The following shall apply to the municipal liquor
dispensary for the off -sale of liquor and wine:
A. The dispensary shall be under the control of the Manager. The Manager may
appoint employees as deemed necessary to operate the dispensary in full
compliance with this Section and State Law. No person under the State
established legal drinking age shall be employed in the dispensary.
B. The Manager may require persons employed in the dispensary to furnish a surety
bond to the City in the same manner as prescribed by Subsection 115.12 of this
Code.
C. Subject to the requirements of M.S. 340A.504, the hours of operation and the
dispensary shall be established by resolution of the Council.
D. All restrictions as to the manner of conducting sales as set forth in Subsection
900.10 except Subd. 7 thereof shall apply to the dispensary.
Subd. 2. On -Sale Dispensary. All restrictions as to the manner of conducting sales as
set forth in subsections 900.10, 900.11 and 900.12 shall apply to the municipal liquor
dispensary for the on -sale of liquor and wine."
Section 2. Subsection 900.03 of the City Code is amended to read as follows:
11900.03 License Required. No person, except wholesalers or manufacturers to the extent
authorized by law, directly or indirectly, upon any pretense or by any device, shall sell at off -sale
any 3.2, percent malt liquor or at on -sale any 3.2 percent malt liquor, intoxicating malt liquor,
wine or intoxicating liquor without first having obtained a license, other than sales by the City at
its municipal liquor dispensary."
Section 3. Subd. 4 of Subsection 900.09 of the City Code shall be amended to read as follows:
"Subd. 4. Wine Licenses. In addition to the requirements of Subd. 1 of this Subsection, no
Wine License shall be granted to any establishment other than a restaurant located in the PCD -1,
PCD -2, PCD -3 Subdistricts, the Mixed Development District or the Planned Office District."
Section 4 Paragraph 0.3 of Subsection 1230.02 of the City" Code shall be amended to read as
follows:
3. 3.2 percent malt liquor, wine and intoxicating malt liquor which is dispensed by the City or
by an agent of the City at, an on -sale dispensary authorized pursuant to Subsection 900.02 may be
consumed subject to other applicable provisions of this Code and subject to the rules and
regulations of the Park Director pursuant to Subsection 1230.06 on the grounds of Braemar Golf
Course. 3.2 percent malt liquor which is dispensed by the City or by an agent of the City at an
on -sale dispensary authorized pursuant to Subsection 900.02 may be consumed subject to other
applicable provisions of this Code and subject to the rules and regulations of the Park Director
pursuant to Subsection 1230.06 on the grounds of Fred Richards Golf Course."
Section 5. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon passage and publication.
First Reading:
Second Reading:
Publication
Attest:
City Clerk
Mayor
2
REPORUREC OMMENDATION
To:
MAYOR AND COUNCIL
Agenda Item
W.A.
From:
Consent
❑
GORDON L. HUGHES
CITY MANAGER
Information Only
❑
Date:
AUGUST 3, 2004
Mgr. Recommends.
❑
To HRA
®
To Council
Subject:
44TH AND FRANCE
El
Motion
BACKGROUND REPORT
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance.
®
Discussion
INFORMATIONBACKGROUND:.
On July 6, 2004, a number of residents from the Morningside neighborhood appeared before the
Council for the purpose of discussing the 40 and France commercial area redevelopment plan
adopted in 1990. The Council directed staff to prepare a background report concerning this plan
for its review at the August 3, 2004, meeting.
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS/DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CREATED
In 1989/1990, the City Council initiated a planning effort for the purpose of establishing tax
increment financing districts ( "TIF districts ") encompassing three neighborhood commercial
districts in the City - 441h and France, Wooddale/Valley View and 70th /Cahill. (TIF districts had
previously been established at 50th and France and Grandview as well as Edinborough and
Centennial Lakes.) In order to establish these new TIF districts, the City needed to prepare plans,
budgets, property acquisition plans and other documents as required by law. Once adopted, tax
growth (i.e. the "increment ") resulting from new development/redevelopment within the TIF
district would be captured by the City for a number of years and used to pay for eligible public
costs authorized by the development plan. Such costs could include property acquisition costs
and developer incentives, as well as public improvement costs such as landscaping and parking.
improvements.
The three TIF districts noted above together comprised a "Development District." Under the
terms of the Development .District, tax increments collected in any of the three TIF districts
could 'be pooled for the purpose of undertaking eligible projects anywhere within the
Development District.
On April 2, 1990, the City Council conducted a public hearing and established the TIF districts
as well as the Development District. Attached herewith are copies of the following to assist you
in understanding the thought process of the Council in establisliing these districts:
• City Council minutes and staff reports from 1990.
The Development District Program and Tax Increment Plan. (Please note that I have not
included the Wooddale/Valley View and the 70th /Cahill portions of the plan, but can
provide those later if requested.)
A copy of the Edina Sun Current article from March 28, 1990, which discussed the
proposed plan.
WHY THE COUNCIL ESTABLISHED THESE DISTRICTS
In reviewing Council minutes and based upon my personal recollection, the Council at that time
was very interested in initiating improvements to the three neighborhood retail districts in the
City. The Council had previously established TIF districts at 50th and France and Grandview and
was pleased with the tools afforded by TIF and the results. It is clear that the Council feared the
prospect of adverse legislation that would limit the City's ability to establish TIF districts in the
future. (As explained below, the Council was correct in this fear.). Therefore, the Council was
interested in creating TIF districts expeditiously, particularly before the end of the 1990
legislative session. In minutes of meetings from that time, Council members spoke of a `window
of opportunity that exists today but might not exist in the future." I recommend that you read in
particular the attached March 19, 1990 and April 2, 1990, meeting minutes to get a full flavor of
the discussion and deliberation.
TIF DISTRICTS DECERTIFIED
Shortly after establishment of the TIF districts and the Development District, the State of
Minnesota enacted a law requiring that certain actions immediately occur in such TIF districts in
order to maintain their status. Required actions included sale of bonds, acquisition of property or
other physical activities. Such actions were not undertaken in the 44th and France or the Valley
View/Wooddale TIF districts. Therefore, these TIF districts "decertified" in 1991 and no tax
increments were ever collected. Qualifying activities did occur in the 70th and Cahill district and,
therefore, this district was able to collect tax increments for the following eight years or so.
d*
As noted above, increments collected in any of the three TIF districts can be used for eligible
public purposes throughout the entire Development District. Therefore, 70th and Cahill
increments could be used at 44th and France or Wooddale/Valley View. The Council elected to
use such increments for the acquisition of.the service station in the Wooddale/Valley View area.
This acquisition and related costs have exhausted all but 'about $280,000 of such funds.
2
Therefore, no tax increments have been collected from the 44th and France TIF district and
limited increments are available from other TIF districts to implement any of the property
acquisitions or other eligible public costs contemplated by the 446h and France redevelopment
plan.
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT REMAINS IN EFFECT
Even though the 44h and France TIF district was decertified, the Development District
encompassing this area remains in effect. Under the terms of the Development District, the City
remains empowered to carry out the development "program" authorized by the Development
District even though no funds currently _ exist for that purpose at 44`h and France except for
leftover 70`h /Cahill increments. The key elements of the development program included the
acquisition and resale of private property for development/ redevelopment, interest assistance,
demolition, relocation and the construction of public improvements such as parking, landscaping
and utilities.
Pursuant to State law, the City enjoys certain powers and authorities within development districts
that it does not have elsewhere. 1n particular, these powers include the authority to acquire
property by eminent domain for subsequent resale and private development and the
implementation of the elements of the development program noted above. Ordinarily, the City
can use its power of eminent domain only to acquire property for public use, . e.g. streets, parks,
utility easements and so forth.
Development districts are common in the City. In fact, essentially all of the retail districts in the
City are located_ within development or. redevelopment districts. In addition to the subject
Development District, the City or its HRA have created districts that remain in effect
encompassing 50th and France,. Grandview as well as the greater Southdale area (France Avenue
to the east City limits from the Crosstown to the south City limits.)
DEVELOPMENT/REDEVELOPMENT PLANS INCLUDED IN COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN
In 1992, the City prepared and adopted an updated Comprehensive Plan pursuant to State law.
(Comprehensive Plans are required to be updated every 10 years for cities in the metropolitan
area.) At that time, the staff recommended, and the Council concurred, that the
development/redevelopment plans for 40 and France as well as the other retail districts in the
City should be included in the updated Comprehensive Plan. The staff s logic at the time was
that the land use plans which were prepared as part of the Development District establishment
could provide valuable guidance to the City when reviewing future private development
proposals for properties within the commercial areas. This recommendation and decision was
made even though two of the TIF districts had been decertified the prior year and the City
therefore lacked the fiscal tools necessary to implement the plan as originally authorized. The
Comprehensive Plan was updated in 2002 and again the development/redevelopment plans for
the retail districts were adopted by reference and remain part of the Comprehensive Plan today.
IMPLEMENTATION OF REDEVELOPMENT PLANS OR DEVELOPMENT
PROGRAMS
3
Even though the Development District continues to exist, the 1990 redevelopment plan could not
be put into place without notice to nearby property owners or without Council deliberation.
Development or redevelopment of private property frequently requires that the City rezone the
property in question. Even if a rezoning is not required, the City Code requires Council approval
of new buildings or the expansion of existing .buildings by more than 10 percent in floor area. In
addition, new or renovated buildings in development districts typically require variances for pre-
existing nonconforming situations such as parking quantity, setbacks and so forth. In all of the
above situations, public hearings are required prior io City approval.
State law also closely regulates the City's exercise of its power of eminent domain. In order to
proceed with a condemnation, the Council must adopt the dopropriate resolutions and filings
with the court. A panel of disinterested experts is appointed by the court and is charged with
establishing the value of the property and awarding the price that must be paid by the
condemning authority. In, addition, the property owner is often eligible for reimbursement for
relocation expenses and other damages. In my experience in Edina, property owners typically
receive generous awards from condemnation panels. However, I would acknowledge that such
proceedings oftentimes are very stressful and unsettling to those involved. To the best of my
knowledge, the City or its HRA has never used its power of eminent domain (or the threat
thereof) to acquire any residence in the City except for the purpose of constructing a street or
establishing a park. The City/HRA has acquired commercial property for redevelopment,
although it has been used sparingly in comparison with many other cities.
ALTERNATIVES
At the July 6h meeting, neighborhood representatives offered a number of recommendations
with respect to the 44th and France plan. The Council could consider the following alternatives:
1. Eliminate 44th and France from the Development District. The Council could
amend the Development District by eliminating the 44 1h and France project area. The City
Attorney advises that the Council can adopt such an amendment by resolution, with or
without a public hearing as determined by the Council. If the Development District were
so amended, the City would relinquish its authority to implement the development
program for the 44h and France area. Specifically, it could not acquire property for
subsequent redevelopment, provide interest assistance, demolish buildings or take other
actions over and above those ordinarily authorized for cities by State law. This action
would prohibit the City from exercising the right of eminent domain except for the
acquisition of private property for public uses.
2. Amend the Development District by Removing Single Family Properties. One of
the principal concerns expressed by residents on July 6t was the prospect of the City
condemning single - family homes. If the Council wished, it could amend the 440' and
France project area by eliminating all single - family properties. This action would allow
the City to retain authority with respect to the non - residential properties. However, no
development program activities including condemnation could be carried out with respect
to existing residential properties. The process for such an amendment would be identical
to that noted above.
4
P
3 Amend the Comprehensive Plan by Deleting Reference to the 44th and France
Redevelopment Plan. As noted earlier, the City's Comprehensive Plan adopted, by
reference, the development/redevelopment plans for 44th and France as well as
Wooddale/Valley View, 70th/ Cahill, Grandview and 50th and France. In addition to
amending the Development Districts as noted above, the Council could also amend the
Comprehensive Plan by deleting the specific reference to 40 and France. From a
process standpoint, amendments to the Comprehensive Plan are more complicated than
amendments to the Development District.- If the City elected to do this, such a plan
amendment would need to originate at the Planning Commission and then be considered
at a public hearing by the Council. If adopted, the amendment would need to be reviewed
and approved by the Metropolitan Council before final adoption by the City Council. As
part of its review process, the Metropolitan Council will require that the plan amendment
be submitted to the City of Minneapolis and Edina Public Schools for review and
comment. When reviewing the proposed amendment, the Metropolitan Council will
consider i) conformity to regional "systems" e.g. sewers, highways, airports etc. ii)
consistency with other metropolitan plans, and iii) compatibility with plans of adjacent
communities and the school district. I would be surprised if the Metropolitan Council had
any substantive concerns regarding such an amendment.
If the Council amended the Comprehensive Plan as described above, any private
development proposals for property in the commercial area would be evaluated in light of
the overall policy statements and land use graphic of the Comprehensive Plan. Such
statements and graphics are much more general in nature than that contained in the 44th
and France redevelopment plan. For example, one of the policy statements in the
Comprehensive Plan is to "provide appropriate buffering at the perimeter of commercial
areas." The Council would of course need to interpret and apply general policies such as
this one when evaluating the merits of any future development proposals. he specific
elements of the 44th and France plan would not be available for Council consideration if
deleted, from the Comprehensive Plan.
4 No Amendment to Development District or Comprehensive Plan. The Council, of
course, need not take any action on the Development District or Comprehensive Plan at
the present time.
5
94'
1/2/90
Manager Rosland said that, basically, honing down the wish list is the direction
staff would want to take. However, when this study was started each facility's
staff was asked to "give us your dreams" and that it was important to let.the plan
breath. Obviously, then hard facts and figures must be applied to bring some
sanity to it.
Member Kelly commented that the Park and Recreation budget is approximately 13% of
the .total City Budget which includes the central services appropriation. The
Council should look at the percentage of the City's budget that goes to. Park and
Recreation and how that meets the demands of the residents. Also, any way to
'generate.revenue should be considered to promote a "pay for itself" policy.
Walter San dison, 4612 W. 58th Street, commented that file had talked with
Commissioner Keefe who indicated that the City contributes roughly 10% of the
-- budget. for the -Hennepin .County - Parks. ,__Commissioner. Keefe had suggested that the
City of Edina get some representation on that Board as we receive nothing in
return..
Mayor Richards said he would convey to the Park Board the comments and concerns of
the Council. and would report back as to the outcome of the January 16 meeting of
the Park Board.
PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT DISTRICTING OUTLINED Mayor Richards referred to the
December 14, 1989 memorandum regarding commercial area redevelopment and the
December 27, 1989 memorandum outlining a preliminary work program from Gordon
Hughes, HRA Executive Director summarized as follows.
T.I.F. District Establishment:
1) Establish T.I.F. districts no later than March 19, 1990.
2) Establish economic development, T.I.F. districts for all retail areas. After
establishment, attempt to upgrade all or part of some of these districts to
redevelopment districts.
3) Attempt to establish T.I.F. districts such that increments can be "pooled"
among all these districts.
Development /Redevelopment Plans:
During the process of establishing the T.I.F. districts, work will start on
preparing detailed development and redevelopment plans. This will include
contacts with tenants and property owners, preparation of ,land use alternative and
public improvement plans and detailed finance plans. This work will require
assistance of the hiring or contracting of-
- Planning consultant(s) to prepare land use and public improvement plans
- Project manager to interface with tenants and property owners, planning
consultants, and potential developers /redevelopers. This individual could
be a part -time contractual employee.
Planning Costs:
No estimates for costs of establishing the districts have been developed. Such
costs must be borne by the City until tax increments are generated by the
districts which.then can be used to repay City costs.
Member Paulus asked at what point in time we would hire the planning consultant(s)
and project manager and what cost the City will incur if this goes no where.
Manager Rosland said that the planning consultant(s) will be involved in
preparation of the required plan describing proposed development activities,
public costs and impacts on other taxing jurisdictions.. The project manager would
be involved after the districts have been established. Executive Director Hughes
explained that no cost estimates have as yet been made. The City would incur
legal and other expenses in the initial work regardless of whether the districts
are established which roughly could be $25,000.
1
1
1 /L /Yu
+' 195
Member Kelly asked how the districts would be affected by the tax law relating to
homestead credits and in particular Centennial Lake s /Edinborough. Director Hughes
explained that prior to the 1989 tax law the state paid homestead credit, that
typically is shared among all the taxing jurisdictions, in tax increment districts
went 100% back to the district. Accordingly, each unit of home ownership property
in these districts received a state paid credit. Under the 1989 tax law,
homestead credit was replaced with transition aid and disappeared. Through the
wording of the new law that transition aid does not get credited 100% back to the.
districts. Instead it flows out, essentially, to school districts. Part of it is
made up in that the City's levy in essence is being increased to make .up for the
lost homestead credit. So within the tax increment districts we will at least
capture the City's share and to a certain extent we will capture the county's
share. From a capital standpoint, the bottom line is that the City will get only
a portion of that homestead credit received in prior years and.that it had hoped
to get in future years out of these districts. Centennial Lakes /Edinborough will
be impacted the most because of the large amount of homo(stead property in the
district. Director Hughes noted that the pay 1990 taxes is the first year that
the City will suffer-from this problem and it would take special legislation to
restore the credit.
It was the consensus of the Council that staff should proceed with the preliminary
work program as outlined to establish.tax increment financing districts for the
retail areas identified.
ETHNIC CELEBRATION TO BE HELD ON 1/21/90 Noah Hurley, Chair, Human Relations
Commission, reminded the Council Members that their presence at the Edina
Community Meeting to be held at Braemar on January 21, 1990 will be greatly
appreciated. He thanked the Council for their support and said the steering
committee has done an outstanding job in preparing for this event and asked that
this become an annual event.
On behalf of the Council, Mayor Richards expressed thanks to Mr. Hurley and Dorie
Barman, members of the Human Relations Commission, for their efforts. He asked
that following the event they give the Council their candid comments.as to future
events.
*RESOLUTION ADOPTED DESIGNATING DEPOSITORIES FOR PUBLIC FUNDS OF CITY Motion was
made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice for adoption of the following
resolution:
RESOLUTION DESIGNATING DEPOSITORIES
BE IT RESOLVED that the First Edina National Bank, Edina, MN, First Southdale
National Bank, Edina, MN, Americana State Bank of Edina, Edina, MN, Southwest
Fidelity State Bank, Edina, MN, First National Bank of Minneapolis, Minneapolis,
MN, Marquette Bank Minneapolis, Minneapolis, MN and Norwest Bank MetroQest, Edina,
MN, authorized to do banking business in Minnesota, be and hereby are designated
as Official Depositories for the Public Funds of the City of Edina., County of
Hennepin, Minnesota, until January 1, 1991.
Resolution adopted on rollcall vote, five ayes.
*SIGNATORY RESOLUTION ADOPTED Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by
Member Rice for adoption of the following resolution:
SIGNATORY RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED that the persons holding office as Mayor, Manager and Treasurer of
the City of Edina, be, and they hereby are, authorized to act for this
municipality in the transaction of any banking business with First National Bank,
First Southdale National Bank, Americana State Bank of Edina, Southwest Fidelity
State Bank, First National Bank of Minneapolis, Marquette Bank Minneapolis and
Norwest Bank MetroWest (hereinafter referred to as the "Bank ") from time to time
and until written notice to any Bank to the contrary, to sign checks against said
accounts, which checks will be signed by the Mayor, Manager and City Treasurer.
F +
MINUTES
S
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
FEBRUARY 5, 1990
Answering rollcall were Commissioners Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and Chairman
Richards.
MINUTES of the BRA Meeting of January 22, 1990, were approved as submitted by
motion of Commissioner Smith seconded by Commissioner Rice.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
ESTABLISHMENT OF T.I.F. DISTRICTS FOR RETAIL -AREAS PROCEEDING. Executive Director-.--
Cordon Hughes reported that work is progressing on establishment of Tax Increment
Financing Districts. A preliminary review of the.plans by Council will be held on
March 19, 1990, then will proceed to the Planning Commission on March 28, 1990, and
to Council on April 2, 1990, for a public hearing.
Chairman Richards opened up the meeting for discussion to the audience. The
Council has felt that exploration should.be done regarding establishing the tax
increment financing districts in the City where there are none now. Three areas
were focused on:.
1. Valley View and Wooddale
2. 70th and Cahill
3. 44th and France
The City has hired a consultant for the purpose of laying. out a schedule /framework
to consider the issue of whether or not to establish tax increment financing
districts in these areas. Chairman Richards stated that on March 19, 1990, the HRA,
will look at the proposed plan,
1) to see if there is any reason to establish these districts,
2) to solicit input from residents, property owners, or business people in .
these areas.
One hearing is before the Planning Commission on March 28, 1990, held at City Hall
in the Manager's Conference Room. The second public hearing will be April 2, 1990,
in the Council Chambers to hear discussion on these proposals. After these
meetings the Council will make a decision. Input will be welcomed from the public._
Chairman Richards encouraged the audience to mark their calendars with these dates.
,
A brief discussion followed. Executive Director Hughes commented that property
owners in the three districts will be getting a notice of a February 27, 1990.,.
informal review. Tenants are welcome but will not receive individual notices.
The owner /manager of the Edina Baskin & Robbins questioned whether businesses would
have to move, would businesses have to improve. the area or what the Commissioners
have in mind. Also, if this is for only the property owners or tenants also. He
questioned the time frame - would it be 5 - 10 years?
Chairman Richards answered that nothing has been decided. Whether the districts
will even be established is up for conjecture. We have been able to see how these
tax increments have allowed the City and HRA to do projects such as at 50th &
France, at.Vernon and at.Southdale /Edinborough /Centennial Lakes. This tool allows
the public sector
to get
involved
and work
with the private property owners
to
see
what options may
exist.
Chairman
Richards
commented that the time could be
5
- 15
,f
H.R.A. Minutes - 2/5/90
Page ,2
• years depending on the laws, which are always subject to change by the legislature.
If nothing is done, the City may be missing an opportunity.
Executive Director Hughes.stated that experience has shown that these commercial
redevelopment projects go in stages; for instance 50th & France where the. initial
project was done in 1914, followed -up in 1979, and another project in 1990 is being
considered.
Chairman Richards again mentioned the dates when establishment of the tax increment
districts would be considered as February 20, 1990, March 28, 1990, April 2, 1990.
Questions are to be directed to Director Hughes at City Hall.
BID AWARDED FOR GRADING - CENTENNIAL LAKES CONDOMINIUNS Motion was made by
Commissioner Smith for award of bid for Centennial Lakes Residential Amenities to
recommended low bidder, Steinninger Construction, at $9,600.00. Motion was
seconded by Commissioner Rice.
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards.
Motion carried.
BOND ISSUES FOR TAX INCREMENT DISTRICTS - EDINBOROUCH AND 50TH & FRANCE DISCUSSED
Jerry Gilligan, City Bond Counsel., referred to his memorandum of February 2, 1990,
in which he stated that the Edina HRA has two tax increment financing districts
created prior to August 1, 1979, 50th & France and Edinborough. The Edinborough
district includes a portion of the Centennial Lakes project. Under the Tax
Increment Financing Act, increment from pre - August 1, 1979 districts have an
outside termination date of August 1, 2009. After April 1, 2001, increment from
pre- August 1, 1979, districts may only be used to pay bonds which were outstanding
on April 1, 1990. Although the 50th & France district is.technically affected by
this restriction, the Edinborough district is more greatly affected in that
significant future phases of the Centennial Lakes development may occur.
Centennial Lakes is composed of two tax increment financing districts, Edinborough
and Centennial Lakes. Bonds issued since the establishment of the Centennial Lakes
district (Bonds issued in 1988 and 1989) are payable from tax increment from both
districts: If additional tax increment bonds are issued for Centennial Lakes after
rr-i-1-- i- - 99a,---tax- 4w-r emeri "- rom=- t-he- Edinber-
eugh -d�� y- --
such bonds until April 1, 2001. The loss of the ability to use increment from the
Edinborough district after April 1, 2001, to pay debt service on bonds issued after
April. 1, 1990, could limit the ability of the HRA to finance additional public
costs for the Centennial Lakes development.
The HRA may consider two options in an attempt to more fully utilize tax increment
from the Edinborough district after April 1, 2001. Both involve issuance and
closing of bonds by the City prior to April 1, 1990.
1. Issue refunding bonds to refund the bonds issued in 1981 and 1986, payable
from tax increment from the Edinborough district, and push out the final
maturity of these bonds until after April 1, 2001. The result is more debt
service payable from the district, but frees up increment prior to
it 1 2001 that would otherwise have been used to pay the principal of the
Apr I ,
refunded bonds. This freed up increment is then available to pay for
Centennial Lakes.project costs. This is a technique recently used by
Minneapolis. This may be an option to consider independent of financing
s
MINUTES OF THE JOINT MEETING OF THE
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY /CITY COUNCIL
HELD AT EDINA CITY HALL
MARCH 19, 1990
A joint meeting of'the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority and the City
Council was convened to consider concurrently: 1) Preliminary Report on Tax
Increment Districts and 2) Extension of Resolution - Acquisition of Kunz Oil /Lewis
Engineering Properties. Action was taken by the HRA and Council as recorded.
RO Answering rollcall were Commissioners /Members Rice, Smith, Richards.
Commissioner /Member Paulus entered the meeting at 7:12 p.m.
MINUTES of the Joint BRA /Council Meeting of March 5, 1990 were approved as
submitted by motion.of Commissioner Smith, seconded by Commissioner Rice.
Ayes: Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried-.- -- —
pRE103 iNARY REPORT PRESENTED ON TAX INCREMENT DISTRICTS• PUBLIC HEARING TO BE HELD
ON 4/2/90 HRA Executive Director Gordon Hughes stated that in accordance with the
Council's request, staff has prepared draft plans supporting the establishment of
tax increment financing districts. at Valley View Road and Wooddale Avenue, 44th
Street and France Avenue, and 70th Street and Cahill Road. These preliminary
plans have been prepared with the assistance of the Hoisington Group, planning
consultant. J. Peter Meyers has also assisted staff in discussions with the
business community. The plans are in the draft stage and the staff and
consultant seek comment and direction concerning them from the HRA Commissioners.
Plan Preparation and Review Process - Prior, to commencing plan preparation, staff
and the consultant met individually with the five. or six key business persons from
each of the three retail area. The purpose was to obtain their comments and
recommendations concerning the area `and to determine if they had particular plans
relating to their businesses. Subsequently, the consultant prepared preliminary
land use and public improvement plans.
On February 27, 1990 staff and the consultant conducted an open meeting with each
of the three retail areas. The preliminary plans were presented and comments and
recommendations were received from those in attendance. On February 28, 1990 the
preliminary plans were presented to the Community Development and Planning
Commission for informal review. Following these meetings, the consultant revised
and refined the land use plans. At the same time, staff has drafted the narrative
that will accompany the plans. The City's legal counsel is presently in the
process of preparing the legal documents necessary for district establishment.
Executive Director Hughes said that the purpose of the preliminary report at this
meeting is to obtain comments and recommendations so that any revisions to these
plans can be made prior to the public hearing on April 2, 1990. Individuals who
were in attendance at the February 27, 1990. meeting have been invited as well as
other individuals who have called to inquire about the plans. The Community
Development and Planning Commission will again review the plans on March 28,.1990
and, hopefully, will pass a recommendation on to the Council.
Status of Tax Increment Financing Legislation - Legislation adverse to tax
increment financing has been introduced in both houses of the Legislature.
Adoption of this legislation would likely restrict the City's ability to create
these proposed tax increment financing districts. It would be important to
establish these districts prior to April 30, 1990, when the proposed legislation
would be effective.
Preliminary Plans - Certain portions of the proposed legislation may affect
districts that are created prior to April 30. In particular,.it may affect the
City's ability to amend existing tax increment financing plans at a later date.
Therefore, the proposed retail plans provide for a wide range of public
involvement based on the reasoning that it may be difficult to expand the scope of
these plans in the future. The adoption of the tax increment financing plans and
districts does not commit the City to 'implement the plans. Establishment of the
districts would provide the financial basis for future City or HRA participation.
Therefore, the plans should be viewed as schematic in nature.
Finance Plans — Finance plans will be incorporated into the legal documents
presented on April 2. As with the land use plans, a wide range of potential
public expenditures is included, e.g. possible public acquisition of properties to
facilitate development /redevelopment. These possible- acquisitions include single
family homes particularly at 44th and France. The strategy has been to include
All possibilities recognizing that legislation may restrict the ability to expand
plans in the future.
Preliminary public cost budgets have been prepared, but staff has not attempted to
determine if adequate tax increments will exist to support such expenditures. In
staff's view, such analyses are best performed at the time specific projects are .
proposed.
Summary - Executive Director Hughes reiterated that staff is anxious to hear the
Council's reaction to the concepts in the land use plans, and secondly, some
direction as to the amount of public involvement in the districts, particularly as
it relates to the potential acquisition of private property for development or
redevelopment. All three proposed districts are affected to some degree, at least
in the draft stage, by the potential acquisition of property by the City to
facilitate development /redevelopment. That is a policy question as to whether the
City should be involved in that role or merely should be involved in the
traditional public right of way type improvements such as was done at 50th and
France. Tax increment financing is"more difficult under the present environment
with the very short duration of districts that the City is faced with today,
compared with the 50th and France District. Two of the proposed districts, e.g.
Valley View/Wooddale and 70th /Cahill have at most an eight year life making it
much more difficult to repay public costs. It is hoped that 44th /France can be
established as a redevelopment district with a 25 -year life and, therefore, a
greater ability to finance public cost.
Executive Director Hughes then introduced Fred Hoisington,-Hoisington Group,
noting that he was a former Edina City Planner and is very familiar with the three
areas that are being studied.
(Commissioner /Member Paulus entered the meeting at this point.)
Fred Ho isington, consultant, then presented graphics of the three retail areas
proposed for tax increment districts. The graphics included the plan area,
existing conditions, analysis, redevelopment plan and public improvement plans.
Mr. Hoisington presented the draft plans in some detail, which are summarized as.
follows:
44th and France Redevelopment Plan - The 44th and France area is a neighborhood
scale commercial district. It was developed as "Downtown Morningside" in the
1930's and has maintained its original flavor. The 44th and France Redevelopment.
Plan area is generally bounded by 44th Street on the north, France Avenue on the
east, 46th Street on the south and Eton Avenue extended on the west.
The Plan Area contains a variety of residential and non- residential land uses.
There are no vacant parcels within_ the Plan Area. The Plan Area is anchored by
the retail uses on France Avenue. Non - residential buildings along West 44th
Street and Sunnyside Road are primarily office uses.
• The character of the Plan Area is that of. an urban, neighborhood scale retail
district. All of the parcels have been developed. Portions of certain developed
parcels contain steep slopes and low areas which provide ponding areas and open
space. Some properties within the Plan Area receive water from Minneapolis.
Electric utilities are above ground throughout the Plan Area.
Parking for office and retail uses is provided in private parking lots and public
on- street parking. The amount of off- street parking does not comply with current
zoning requirements. Convenient parking is lacking for many businesses in.the
central part of the.Plan•Area.
Most buildings in.the Plan Area were constructed ,tn the 1930's and 1940's. Most
..remain structurally sound but a significant percentage suffer, from structural and
life- safety code problems requiring substantial renovation or complete
redevelopment-. - -
Much of the charm of 44th and France is its eclectic and somewhat haphazard
development pattern. However, this has created.some problems. The commercial
area is not clearly defined and this has resulted in the conversion of some single
family homes to non - residential uses. It has also resulted in disinvestment in
single family homes because they are isolated and relate only to non - residential
uses. The lack of a clear definition. of the retail center and transitional
buffers is a blighting influence. on single family homes nearby.
The Edina Cleaners, located at France Avenue and Sunnyside Road, in addition to
its original structure occupies what was originally the Westgate Theatre. In
Addition to its retail function it operates a large -scale dry cleaning plant.
This industrial use is inappropriate in a neighborhood scale retail center.
Parcels to the south contain inappropriate and obsolete land uses. Building
conditions range from substandard to fairly good.
The central portion of the business district is served by a relatively large
surface parking area accessed from Sunnyside Road. The shared parking area is
owned by a number of property owners. Poor access, grade differentials and no
organization of the spaces and drive aisles makes this very inefficient parking.
The office uses along 44th Street have an adverse effect on residential properties .
on the north side of 44th Street. This has resulted in a lack of maintenance and
reinvestment resulting in substandard buildings.
The Redevelopment Plan showed redevelopment in the area south of Sunnyside Road
with office to the south and 15,000- 20,000 square feet of retail on the corner of
Sunnyside /France.. An entry feature on the corner would identify the area as a
retail center. The large surfacing parking area would be improved and
reorganized. Potential retail development could occur in the Linhoff building
area, with possible expansion by Durr, Ltd. Low to medium density multi - family
housing could occur on the north side of 44th Street to eliminate the existing
conflict. Undergrounding of electric utilities and street landscaping would be
included in public improvements to correct problems with public streets /sidewalks.
Wooddale and Valley View Road Development Plan - The Wooddale and Valley View Road
Plan Area is primarily a neighborhood scale commercial area. The area developed
in the late 1950's and early 1960's. There has been some redevelopment in the
area but it has maintained its original flavor. Deficiencies in the area are
primarily related to serious traffic and parking problems. In addition, there
exists at least one significant inappropriate use and some incompatibility
between residential and commercial uses. Physical development is now outdated and
is gradually deteriorating and is in need of upgrading.
The Plan Area in general includes the tracts adjacent to the north side of Valley
View Road from the Valley View Center west.of Wooddale Avenue, extending to
J 1 , :;f
Oaklawn Avenue. The Plan Area is completely developed with urban, neighborhood
retail features. All private utilities, except natural gas, are above ground.
Parking conditions vary throughout the Plan Area. To the west of Wooddale at the
Valley View Center a surplus of parking exists. All uses east of Wooddale have
insufficient parking. Cars are often double parked or parked onto the City right
of way. Parking lots are privately owned and some sharing does. occur.
Circulation within the area is difficult. In many instances there is not
separation between sidewalk and street and /or parking and street. Numerous large
access /egress points also exist.
An analysis of the Plan Area showed general problems as:
Broad expanses of pavement; no greenspace
Poor signage; no continuity of architecture
Too many driveways; to wide and undefined
Disorganized parking area
Lack of commercial district identify
Limited expansion potential.
Within the commercial area, activities at the Conoco Station are inappropriate and
do not conform to the Zoning Ordinance requirements. Land.use conflicts also
exist between the commercial area and the adjacent residential properties to the
north, particularly east of Kellogg.
The public improvements project would include activities intended to correct
non - conforming conditions in the boulevard area and to correct parking and
circulation problems in the district. It would provide an identity for the
commercial area as well as improving the appearance by providing landscaped
boulevards and parking areas. Replacing above ground utilities with underground
utilities is also included.
The development project would remove the Conoco Station and replace it with
off - street parking for the Clinic /Drug Store building and for the Sports
Shop /Baskins Robbins building. Kellogg Avenue would no longer connect to Valley
View Road to help isolate the residential area from the commercial district. The
additional parking would allow the elimination of non - conforming and hazardous
parking along the east and south side of the Clinic /Drug Store. These areas as
well as others along the perimeter of the development would be landscaped and
screened. Wooddale Avenue would be widened with the addition of a.third lane for
right and left hand turns.
The Development Plan includes an addition.of approximately 6,000 square feet to
the southwest end of the existing Valley View Center. The site is under utilized
and present parking would accommodate the additional floor space. The .Plan also
anticipates remodeling and upgrading of the present center concurrent with the
expansion.
70th Street and Cahill Road Development Plan - The 70th Street and Cahill Road
Plan Area is a diverse mix of residential, commercial and industrial uses. The
area developed primarily between 1950 and 1975. The Plan Area is bounded by 70th
Street to the north, the railroad right of way to the east, the northern boundary
(from east to west) of the Gabberts building, Village Drive extended and the City
of Edina park open space property to the south, and the rear lot lines of the
single family homes fronting on Lanham Lane and Lee Valley Circle to the west. y
Land use in the Plan Area covers a full spectrum of uses. Five zoning districts
are spread across the 17 parcels in the Plan Area which in total comprises
approximately 27 acres. The Plan Area is essentially completely developed,
however, land to building ratios are relatively high particularly west of Cahill
Road. Open space is comprised of woods and steep slopes. There is also a grade
separation which divides the commercial land east of Cahill into north and south
components. The Plan Area is a part of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District.
Drainage from the area flows to the south along Cahill Road and east along West
70th Street. All private utilities, except natural gas, are routed above ground.
In general, the broad land use categories of the Plan Area are appropriate. As,
currently utilized, however, the following land use problems exist: 1) Land Use
Relationships - The transition between single family residential uses and higher
intensity uses could be improved. 2) Under, Utilized Parcels Parcels in the Plan
Area are of adequate size to accommodate reasonable development. However, land to
building ratios are high and buildings are located in a manner which prevents.
infill development. Specifically, a) the former Edina School building, b). the old
St. Patrick Church, and c) , the commercial area between Amundson and Cahill Road.
An analysis of the Retail Center identified the following problems:
Buildings are disconnected
Lacks unified orientation
Lacks proper fit with market area
General lack of evergreen and shrub plantings
Access to shopping center is awkward and unclear
Center building is on slope; rear of building faces Cahill Road and is
difficult to lease
Amundson Avenue no longer needed.
Land Use related components of the Development Plan emphasize elimination of uses
inconsistent with the Land Use Plan designations and encourage appropriate
redevelopment, particularly west of Cahill Road. In addition, redevelopment of
functionally obsolete buildings is.-anticipated, particularly in the retail portion
of the Plan Area. Reestablishment of an appropriate portion of the Plan Area as a
historical feature is also anticipated. Development and redevelopment should be
principally accomplished privately with public acquisition for development kept to
a minimum.
Physical Development components of the Development Plan emphasize.. the upgrading of
site and building features to meet contemporary user standards. As to relocation,
it is the intent of the H.R.A. that current owners of properties designated for
redevelopment be party to .efforts to redevelop their .properties.
The Development Plan illustrates a. number of projects in the Plan Area which
encompass both public and private property:
Public Improvements - This project would eliminate unnecessary streets, improve
sidewalks and other public and private utility systems and would designate the
historical significance of the Plan Area.
Residential Project - This project would encourage development consistent with the
land use designations of the Land Use Plan as amended in 1990. The project area
is west of Cahill Road and south of 70th Street. Development may include single
family residential to the far west of possibly 13. homes and as many as 21 attached
dwellings on the east portion.
Retail Project - This project is sensitive to immediate service area needs. The
project would upgrade and /or create facilities which meet current user demands. A
high priority would be to encourage the establishment of businesses to better
serve the market area. It is anticipated that the retail project may take one of
two possible directions:
Alternative A - This alternative would involve the complete development of
i 4
the commercial area. It would call for the elimination of the five buildings
in the existing commercial area, plus the 7075 Amundson building and the
construction of two new buildings totaling 66,000 square feet. A greater
number of tenants is also anticipated including potentially upscale
convenience. retailers. Public activities may include those in Alternative B
as well as the following:
Soil correction and preparation
Street vacation
Land acquisition
- Relocation of individuals and businesses
- Land writedowns
- Low interest loans
- Sale of land to private developer.
Alternative B -.This alternative would involve the refurbishing of the
existing commercial area. Retail floor areas and tenant users will not
change significantly. Public activities may include the following:
- Interest assistance for rehabilitation
Pedestrian /sidewalk improvements
Lands cap ing /s tree tscape improvements
- Clearance and demolition
- Identification and directional signage.
Following the conclusion of the presentations by Mr. Hoisington, Mayor Richards
called for public comment.
Dr. Frank Sidell stated that he has owned the building at 3920 Sunnyside Road for
30 years, in which his practice is: located, together with the parking lot. The
Redevelopment Plan for the 44th and France Area would confiscate his parking lot
and devalue his property. He said his son has joined his practice and future
plans include expansion of the building. The Redevelopment Plan would be a large
negative and would seriously jeopardize their building plans.
Steve Soltau, 6100 Oaklawn Avenue, said the proposed closing of Kellogg would
increase the traffic problems which now exist at the Oaklawn/Valley View
triangular intersection. He objected to reorienting the parking for -the
clinic /drug store building towards the residential area. As a bus rider, he said
he would like to see some parking included for bus riders.
1
James Van Valkenburg stated that he represented the Edina Cleaners & Launderers at
4500 France Avenue South. He said that his clients are concerned that the removal
of their existing building will put them out of business. Currently, they have
approximately 2,000 customers per week, most of whom use the drop -off area in
front of their facility. Also, because they are one of very few commercial
Cleaners in the metropolitan area they are concerned that they will lose that
business.
Sam Thorpe, owner of the Convention Grill
property is under lease for 8 more years.
believed that taking away the parking for
value of the property. He said one of the
Convention Grill is that they can usually
at 3912 Sunnyside Road, stated that the
Not knowing the financial setup, he
that property would severely damage the
advantages for customers coming to the
find a parking place.
Bill Schlink stated that he is the owner of the Unocal station at 5415 W. 70th
Street. The development plan for the 70th Street and Cahill Road area does not
show a service station. He said his station does serve a lot of customers in that
neighborhood, is a good location and that there are other ways of accomplishing
those projects that would be less costly. He cautioned against rushing into the
• project. He said several of his customers who know of the plan are upset with the
idea.
Dr. Phillip Sidell said he had several concerns -for the 44th and France
Redevelopment- Plan. First, he objected to the 4 -6 homes that would be lost and
the affect on the remaining adjacent homes. Secondly, once this is passed:it was
his impression that the plan is the ideal or goal for the area and that.future
plans must fit into this mold. If someone would like to do remodeling or
rebuilding that does not fit into the mold they would have a difficult time to get
a variance or some other way to achieve that.
Bob Roster stated he was a partner with his father in Roster's Conoco on Valley
View Road. He said at times the U -haul trucks at their station may be unsightly
but it appears that services stations of that type are marked territory. for
redevelopment.. He- mentioned that -they are the oldest established U -haul
dealership in Minnesota and have been providing this service for.32 years for the
Edina community. They have adequate parking for their business but that the real
problem was inadequate parking for Baskins Robbins and the bike shop. He
mentioned when that corner was developed the last building built was the house.
next to the bike shop which lot should have been parking for that retail area. He
He felt that house should also be included to provide future parking for that
corner rather than acquiring his property. Also, that the houses to the north
would not have to be removed if the parking could be addressed for the problem
location. Mr.. Roster pointed out that there is another house behind Best
Reflections that has easement rights through the parking lot behind Baskins.
Robbins. He said that has not been addressed in the plans.
Kathy Reckie stated she was the owner of Best Reflections at 4400 Valley View
Road. She said they renovated the building about eight years ago and added
parking for their customers. She said if the building is taken it would be
devastating to lose her business and for those that work for her to lose their
jobs.
No further public comment being heard, Mayor Richards clarified that at this time
no development or redevelopment project is being proposed to be undertaken. What
the Council is doing is to make sure that any future Council has all the tools
available.to it to do whatever is reasonable, right and necessary to make sure
that these areas can accomplish the objectives not only from the public side
but what the private sector wants. The Council is not advocating any position as
to taking of any businesses, demolishing of parking, etc. What the Council is
trying to do is give itself the opportunity to look at all those .issues if and
when they might come before the Council.
Mayor Richards said the tax increment financing districts are being considered
because there is a window -of opportunity that exists today that might not exist in
the future, e.g. the use of financing mechanisms for public participation. If the
Council decides on April 2 to establish these tax increment districts it does not
mean that any of the plans presented would be implemented. That is yet to be
decided. This is one step in the process that if not taken may preclude the
Council from using one of the alternative tools that might otherwise be available
to the public sector in dealing with some of these development and redevelopment
issues that may come up in the future.
Mayor Richards said this community has not seen a great deal of exercise by the
Council in the taking of private property. This is a policy issue that needs to
be discussed and debated as to the Council exercising that power if the proper
public purpose were found. He concluded by saying that it is important for the
public to understand the process and what the Council is trying to accomplish.
He said that just because a plan has been proposed he did not want anyone to think.
that it was a given that the plan would be implemented. He encouraged the
audience to return on April 2 for the public hearing on whether to establish the
proposed tax increment districts.
Member Smith made a motion setting April 2, 1990, as the.public hearing date on
designation of the development district and approval of tax increment financing
plans.
Motion was seconded by Member Rice.
Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
- -Jan Salto, 6100 0aklawn Avenue, said she was concerned because only one plan has
been presented for each of the three areas. Mr. Hoisington explained that in
talking with a number of the business people involved, they have gone through two
or three iterations of the plans to get to this point. There has been a lot of
consideration given to alternatives already and that would be an ongoing process.
88/1/90 Executive Director Hughes recalled that on October 2, 1989 the HRA adopted
a resolution concerning the acquisition of the Kunz Oil /Lewis Engineering
properties for redevelopment purposes. The resolution was valid and effective
only until December.31, 1989 and was further conditioned that acquisition could
not occur until the HRA had received.a signed and delivered redevelopment
agreement for the property. On December 18, 1989 the HRA extended the resolution
until March 30, 1990.
Director Hughes advised that on March 15, 1990 staff received a proposal for tax
increment financing assistance from Jerry's Enterprises and Opus Corporation
regarding the subject property. No other proposals have been received to date.
Based upon staff's estimate of the time needed to process the proposal for tax
increment assistance as well as a rezoning of the property, staff would recommend
extension of the resolution until August 1, 1990.
Following some discussion on why this has been dragging on with no positive action
indicated by Jerry's and Opus, Commissioner Smith moved adoption of the following
resoiut%n:
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority that it hereby
extends the provisions of the resolution adopted on October 2, 1989 and extended
on December 18, 1990 relating to acquisition of certain property within the
Grandview redevelopment area to August 1, 1990..
Motion for adoption of the resolution.was seconded by Commissioner Paulus.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Paulus, Smith, Richards
Nays: Rice
Resolution adopted.
Motion was made by Commissioner Smith and was seconded by Commissioner Paulus for
adjournment of the H.R.A. Motion was carried unanimously.
HRA Executive Director
City Clerk
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALT
APRIL 2, 1990
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and Mayor
Richards.
VOLUNTEER RECOGNITION WEEK PROCLAIMED Motion of Member Kelly was seconded by
Member Smith for adoption of the following proclamation:
PROCLAMATION - VOLUNTEER RECOGNITION WEEK
WHEREAS, volunteers have enriched the life of our community through their concern,
commitment, and generosity of spirit; and
WHEREAS, volunteers are a vital resource to provide for the well -being of our
community and its citizens; and
WHEREAS, volunteerism embodies a spirit of giving and spirit of growth; and
WHEREAS, the City of Edina is proud of the efforts of our volunteers and wishes to
thank them for their dedicated service;
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Frederick S. Richards, Mayor of Edina, Minnesota, do hereby
proclaim the week of April 15 - 21, 1990, as:
VOLUNTEER RECOGNITION WEEK
ADOPTED this 2nd day of April, 1990.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by
Member Rice to approve and adopt the consent agenda items as presented.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
*MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 5 AND JOINT HRA /COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH
19, 1990 APPROVED Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member
Rice to approve the Minutes of the Regular March 5 and Joint HRA /Council Meeting
of March 19, 1990.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
PUBLIC HEARING CONDUCTED ON THE DESIGNATION OF DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AND APPROVAL
OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLANS ADOPTED Gordon Hughes, Assistant City Manager,
advised that notice of this hearing was published and sent to the School Board, to
the Board of Commissioners of Hennepin County, and also to property owners in the
proposed districts although this is not a requirement. The three areas for
consideration are:
1. 44th Street and France Avenue
2. Valley View Road and Wooddale Avenue
3. 70th Street and Cahill Road
The development program and tax increment financing plans comprise the legal
documents which establish the districts. Plans are required prior to the
establishment of T.I.F. Districts and the plans are conceptual and not final.
Establishment of T.I.F. Districts is the basis for estimating public costs and tax
increment revenues and a framework for deciding the location and the amount of
future public expenditures. Mr. Hughes stated that these plans rely ultimately on
market place decisions. He noted that these development /redevelopment plans do
not constitute rezonings, amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, site plans,
or an authorization to acquire private property. These are not the only plans,
i
property owners /developers may propose different plans for these districts and
public hearings would have to be held.
Fred Hoisington, of the Hoisington Group, a consulting planner who has prepared
land use -plans for the site was introduced by Assistant Manager Hughes also
introduced was J: Peter Meyers-who-has assisted the City as liaison -with the
business community:
Mr. Hoisington inquired about how much background should be presented to the
audience, with a reminder that a-number of people had:- -not seen the proposal.
Mayor Richards told Mr. Hoisington to go through the .plans again to familiarize
everyone with what the development -plans propose. Mr. Hoisington .stated.that
consultants like to look at the plans for the three areas in a planners view.
Problems and needs of these areas are as follows by area:
44th Street and France Avenue.- The plan.presented stressed a - concept more
than a physical plan with a change in density of housing on the north side of 44th
Street, yet maintaining the character, ownership and architecture of the area.
The area closest to 44th has a lack of parking while buildings in back have a
surplus of spaces. Steep slopes pose a problem in developing parking in this
area. Rehabilitation of the area was mentioned. Mr. Hoisington described a
redevelopment of the area south of Sunnyside Road which would include a retail
center of 15,000- 20,000 sq.ft, and an office building of 8,000- 10,000 sq. ft.
Wooddale Avenue and Valley View - Streets are 61st, Kellogg, and Oaklawn.
Landmarks are a large multi - family building, day -care center /office building,
shopping center and gas station. Mr. Hoisington pointed out the dangers of the
area; risks for pedestrians, parking and circulation of traffic. Some unsightly
uses exist, while roads do not meet State Aid standards. The conceptual plan,
shows a possible expansion of the shopping center, clinic and drug store, with a
refocusing of that location to the east. The conceptual plan also shows some
restructuring and reorientation but retention of some business to reflect the
Comprehensive Plan which states these types of districts should be contracted to a
degree. A need was noted for Kellogg not to continue through to Valley View but a
separation between retail and residential could be designed by creating...a
hammerhead cul -de -sac. Landscaping, with entry features, the widening of Wooddale
from 30' to 32' -36 with turn -lanes would be an attempt to create identity for the
area.
70th Street and Cahill Avenue - Streets in the area are West 70th Street,
Cahill Road and Amundson Avenue. Landmarks are the old Cahill School, a
multi - family housing unit and Cahill Shopping Center. Cahill Center, built in the
1601s, has experienced some leasing difficulties because of the steep grade and
dis- jointed buildings. The conceptual plan is if one building could be built,
retailers could leverage off of each other. One approach for King's Court would
be upgrading and expansion plus, the development of a single center with one
building. The plan could would include possible vacation, addition of a
cul -de -sac on Amundson with the result being the retention of the industrial and
redevelopment of the center. One other idea is to eliminate the central building
and link all buildings together. One main problem with this link would be the 7'
grade between the buildings. Rehabilitation of these buildings is another
possibility via low- interest loans.
•
Assistant Manager Hughes spoke about the recommended action needed to adopt the
Resolution which approves the development plan and the tax increment financing
plans for each district.
Mayor Richards commented that letters have been received, reproduced and
circulated to all of the Council Members. He opened the Public Hearing and asked
for comments and concerns from the audience. He stated the reason we are again
looking at this is in the belief that the window of opportunity exists to give the
City necessary tools to properly plan these commercial areas. - There are no plans
being decided upon tonight, only the creating of tax increment districts under
consideration, if the Council wishes.
Dr. Philip Sidell, 3920 Sunnyside Road; Mary Jo Aiken, 4548 France Av. S.; Jim Van
Valkenburg; attorney representing the Edina Cleaner's; Dr. Franklin Sidell, 3920
Sunnyside; Ruth Elwell, 4311 Eton Place; Bill Scholmak, Attorney representing Mr.
Gold; Laura Plaetzer, 4058 Sunnyside Road; Walt Sandison, 4612 W. 58th St.; Bob
Roster, owner of Roster's Service & Rentals on Valley View Road & Kellogg; Eric
Kolsom, 3924 44th St. W; Lois Roen - Brickley, 6120 Kellogg spoke in opposition of
the development tax increment financing districts. Steve Soltau, 6100 Oaklawn
Av. spoke in favor of the creation of these districts.
One member of the audience asked if one vote would be taken for all districts or
votes taken individually. Mayor Richards commented that each area would be voted
on individually. The question was asked if both sides of France Avenue would be
involved. Assistant Manager Hughes answered that Minneapolis has been contacted
about their embarking on their own tax increment plan and said he hoped they could
later join efforts. Another question was whether the lines on the proposal could
be expanded or contracted. Assistant Manager Hughes said it is more difficult to
add a parcel to the district rather than delete it.
Audience comments and concerns ranged from concern about property being taken, and
concern over the nearly completed renovation of some properties, loss of business
because of relocation, different levels of parking lots, traffic problems, the
necessity of change, the concern for the maintaining of the unique charm and
..architecture -,_ s_afety� _the upgrading_ of _.Valley View_ was a often heard comment,
landscaping would be desirable, and less population would be a plus.
Mayor Richards asked for questions or concerns from the Council or audience.
Member -Kelly asked J. Peter Meyer if he would explain what he has done with this
proposal.
J. Peter Meyers, stated he has spent 6 weeks representing the City as a liaison .
between the planner, involved parties and the City. Upon his recommendation, and
with his attendance, one -on -one private meetings were held for those who had
concerns or questions.
Member. Kelly, asked Mr. Meyers what his assessment was of the meetings held. Mr.
Meyers said there had been some lack of understanding, but with property owners
input, questions began to arise and answers were attempted. Some property owners
now represented directly, received answers from neighbors or via rumors and he
felt some of the apprehension is being represented at this meeting. He said his
job was to alleviate some of that apprehension by the meetings. He feels the City
is not taking advantage of the property owners, but offering a tool that has been
Member Rice questioned a troubling comment that was heard regarding whether the
free market process is inhibited if these districts are adopted.
Assistant Manager Hughes answered that by adopting the plan,. some properties or
certain buyers could become undesirable or might chill a sale. On the other side,
the presence of a property in a district tends to attract buyers rather than chill
the buyers. Member Rice asked in which district was this the case. Mr. Hughes
stated that at 50th & France, three homes south of the Peoples Plus station are
included in the plan and were shown for multi - family housing, that housing has
never occurred, yet sales on those houses have been brisk. Member Rice questioned.
about another comment regarding the expansion of a business and if this
establishment of this district would be a detriment to this. Manager Hughes
answered no, the plan shows an opportunity for expansion, and would add some
credence of expanding the business rather than opposing a negative on it. This
could vary property by property, retail opportunities could be enhanced rather
than be reduced.
•
properly used by Edina in the past, with this. being the opportunity to do that.
Member Kelly asked again whether we are trying to reconstruct a blighted area or
that we are meeting a social need for .public good. Mr. Meyers said we are looking
to the - future, no one knew what the effect of Southdale would be when it was being
developed either. Member Kelly expressed her thanks to Mr. Meyers for his work on
this project..
Member Rice mentioned about previously heard comments regarding 44th.and some to
.Valley View &.Wooddale.. At the - last - hearing, ,Mr _Rice said -he _- -felt there was less,
opposition-at 70th:& Cahill than at 44th and at Valley & Wooddale, and asked Mr.
Meyers if.he felt the same. Mr:, Meyers- concurred.
Mayor.-Richards answered the question about the necessity of establishing this tax
increment financing area, stating we need not do anything, and could let matters
resolve themselves which would be an easier course, but he.does not believe this
is the right course: The.do- nothing course would deprive property owners of:.an
advantage that others have experienced and continue to experience with tax
increment financing districts. Mayor Richards mentioned the bashing by
legislators of Edina for the mis- handling of tax increment money, and being
compared to Minneapolis. He stated that Edina has not and will not go that route.
We are fiscally responsible in Edina and will remain so. Mayor Richards predicts
some residents will come before the Council at a later date asking for help with
public improvements and public monies and Council is proposing they do them all
themselves. Again, we could do nothing, and miss the opportunity to create a
situation to work with the private sector in trying to improve these areas. In
answer to comments, about putting in a lot of money with no pay -back, Mayor
Richards explained the City would not spend money unless we can be assured it can
be captured in the tax increment financing district. In explanation to another
comment heard regarding the ability to use these vehicles for financing of public
improvements but not to give a subsidy to the private sector. Mayor Richards said
if money is available it could pay for the public improvements, if not, those.
public improvements are not done. The statement that we are engaged in deficit
spending is not accurate. Another comment heard about taking residential /private
properties, philosophically, he would not support any private property being
taken. He offered his support in the creation of these districts which would
--
--
- - -- - - -- - — - -. -- - -.- - -- - - -.- - -
- - -- enable the private sector and - remaining viable areas ab -Ie-to compete with other
areas throughout the metropolitan area.
Member Rice questioned a troubling comment that was heard regarding whether the
free market process is inhibited if these districts are adopted.
Assistant Manager Hughes answered that by adopting the plan,. some properties or
certain buyers could become undesirable or might chill a sale. On the other side,
the presence of a property in a district tends to attract buyers rather than chill
the buyers. Member Rice asked in which district was this the case. Mr. Hughes
stated that at 50th & France, three homes south of the Peoples Plus station are
included in the plan and were shown for multi - family housing, that housing has
never occurred, yet sales on those houses have been brisk. Member Rice questioned.
about another comment regarding the expansion of a business and if this
establishment of this district would be a detriment to this. Manager Hughes
answered no, the plan shows an opportunity for expansion, and would add some
credence of expanding the business rather than opposing a negative on it. This
could vary property by property, retail opportunities could be enhanced rather
than be reduced.
•
Member Smith took exception to the comment that this establishment of a tax
increment district idea was dreamed up in response to folks in St. Paul. He
explained this issue was discussed last spring and may have forced us to.adopt a
schedule, and identify things that we could maintain such as viable retail areas.
The intent was not to control what could be or could not be done with buildings in
the area. Looking at the plans, we. are shown -the planner's view. Maintaining the
vitality of the buildings and homes is - the City's job. He stated he sees. little -
wrong .at 44th but would like to facilitate some fix -up of the area-.;, __ "Onerway this
can be assured. is to .-capture- increments of tax between a certain date 'and. -a future
date. This would not be developed, by :the City, nor would.-homes be purchased,,. this
would -be done by a developer with an.interest in your property. Correspondence
-has been received regarding the. Valley View. area. Some property owners in that
-area have ideas of what they would like to see done.. Member -Smith commented that
he does not want things to be razed, but is interested- in.options we have to
invest in improving the area. In the 70th & Cahill area-, we.have.seen.,a planners
view. The owner of the property has begun doing some improvements, without asking
for public money. He said his hope would be that the City would have the money
for the property owner when he would be ready to improve the area, street wise,
etc.. The charm of these areas must be maintained, but somehow the City needs to
be ready when the area needs the.help. In answer to an audience question about
trust of the Council to maintain the same posture. Member Smith stated it depends .
on the Council that you elect having your same views. He encouraged the audience
to attend. Council meetings, write letters to the Council with their views, and to
attend planning commission meetings when these issues are being decided upon.
Member Jane Paulus stated the job of the City Council is to represent the whole
City in long range planning, not only for today but for years in the future. Her
perception of what she has heard tonight is mainly.a 'me' point of view and is
difficult to address one -on -one. Residential areas in Edina that seem to be
appreciating the greatest in home value are. those that have a neighborhood
identity. People moving into these areas want a small area they can walk to, and
seem to be bringing prime dollars back today into these areas. Member .Paulus said
these three areas hit these points very well..
.
what were the _. She a._difficult
_:__ Member _Peggy_Kelly_asked_ f
time with tax increment financing, she believes the private sector should be.the
risk- taker in a market - driven economy yet she had a concern a.few years ago about
the 44th & France area when Minneapolis was doing improvements on their side of
the. Member Kelly commented that she is pleased with improvements she sees
happening. She still hears comments about the beautiful way the 50th & France
project turned out. During the time of the improvements with 50th & France the
economic climate was different and she does not feel 44th & France has the same
characteristics. The 70th & Wooddale area has two problems, the gas station and
traffic. The Cahill development has been before the Council before, and said she
is looking for some.public assistance there to make it happen. Member Kelly said
this is a hard decision but feels she must vote against the proposal.
Member Rice asked if there was a timeline on these projects. Manager Hughes
commented that the duration of the Wooddale.& Valley View district and the 70th &
Cahill district would be a maximum of 10 years from the day of its establishment
or at most 8 years of increments. 44th & France could last a maximum of 25 years.
Member Rice questioned if the vote taken tonight would be to establish these
districts. Manager Hughes stated yes. Member Rice asked if at any time in the
next few years more planning could be initiated with no effective date. Member
ti
Hughes commented that there is a four - year, knock -out provision, which means if a
parcel is not benefitted by a public project or through tax increment financing
within four years of establishment, that parcel drops out of the district. If
later, for instance in, the fifth year, it could then come in to the district but
just for three more years, until the conclusion of the.district.
Member Rice said that he agrees with many comments heard; but does not agree with
the taking of property: -He believes the planner working-with the City has
responded well but think the plans are too aggressive. He said if he were drawing
the lines or putting -in uses,�:he =- would -do them differently.
He commented he has heard conflicting comments such.as, save my business, even
though it is unsightly, and don't touch-this facility, it generates 2,000 cars per
week, and then don't do.anything that will increase traffic. He stated he is in
favor of the establishment of these districts, as it gives. the City an option.
There are no mandates to do anything at any time, but the opportunity and option
to .work with the single family and property owners in these areas. One.
interesting comment was made that this would be a catalyst to spur more
examination of these areas and establishing cooperation between private and public
sector. Some visions for the futures.of.these areas must be seen. Member Rice
stated he would vote in favor of these proposals.
Member Smith .inquired about when the 50th & France development was done, how were
the people and property owners within that tax increment district involved. Mayor
Richards stated that in 1970 -72, one of the.strongest groups was the 50th & France,
Business Association which still meets on a regular basis. The Vernon Avenue area,
has a group that meets on a regular basis with continuous involvement also.
Assistant Manager Hughes commented that a steering committee was and still is
working as an interface with the City. The committee is typically made up of
tenants and landlords and is currently meeting with him on a monthly basis on a
prospective project this year. Member Smith questioned the type of input he was
hearing from the 50th & France Association,.and what impact they have had.
Manager Hughes stated they had participated very closely in the initial project
and with the present project are guiding our architect more than staff in terms of
the urban design elements that are being pursued.
- - — -
Member Kelly asked if members of the 50th & France Business Owners Association is
comprised of members of the Minneapolis side too. Manager Hughes said yes the
Association does have Minneapolis members and that the Edina side is in a tax
increment district while the Minneapolis side is not.. The improvements for the
Minneapolis side were financed through special assessment as opposed to tax
increment financing. Member Kelly asked that perhaps the association does more
than work with tax increment issues. Manager Hughes commented yes.
Member Rice inquired if property owners would feel like they were in a quandry if
these districts were established, and would an orderly timetable be developed.
Manager Hughes stated that it varies from district to district. The 44th & France
district is similar to 50th & France and recommendation would be to encourage that
area to adopt and establish an association that can be worked with - to bounce
ideas off of and be a sounding board. Member Rice asked if this timetable was
meant to be months or years. Manager Hughes commented months would be needed to
get something like that started. 70th & Cahill is a much less cohesive area and
one property owner is instrumental with what will happen in that district. Valley
View & Wooddale is more in the middle, with two key owners in this district. An
association would also be beneficial in this area. Manager Hughes stated that
S
after creating the districts, it would be the decision of the Council how
aggressive or reactive they would like to be in promoting the districts.
Mayor Richards commented the issue of aggressive or reactive promoting of the area
bears discussing. The City has not been proactive in trying to promote types of
improvements. The initiative has come from the _private sector with building
expansion, etc. He-referred to the four previous-tax-increment districts that
have been instituted, that the - initiative had been taken by -the City. This could.-
be done-, but would -fly in the face of the City, ip that if-_the private sector does:
not want to do it:- -then: the City shouldn't propose it. The City.is -not creating
projects, and if a.deadline is put on it might create an artificial.: -
stimulation that may or may not be warranted by -.the area. -that is under discussion.
Member Rice .inquired whether it would be the:City's policy,---to- encourage-:these
areas to be in constant communication with City.staff, that these plans and uses
are not in concrete; but are here to help Mayor Richards:- concurred that we are
here to discuss any proposals that the private sector may come up with.
Member Kelly asked in establishing these districts., if the-City must have a plan
in order to approve a district, how much flexibility can we have with the plan.
Attorney Gilligan explained that under the statute there.is.no need for detailed
plans or land uses that are set forth in the development program. Goals and
objectives need to be stated about the City's intentions, but no details need to
be done.
^� Member Smith asked if it is typical in a plan to go into the detail that has been
done for these proposed districts. Attorney Gilligan stated that many of these
plans come about because there is a development that will occur, so it is known,
as opposed to not knowing what is going to happen.: The proposals for the
districts allow for much more flexibility and are proposed plans, but do not
commit the City to the specific land use. Member Smith said in his understanding
of the plan, we do not have "little boxes" of future development. In the plan a
line has been drawn around a neighborhood or an area and that identifies the
.district. The plan does not spell out this or that happening, but is background
information staff has used to determine what the size the district should be.
Mayor Richards asked the pleasure of-the Council.
Council Member Rice made a motion for the adoption of the following resolution as
it relates to the establishment of a`tax increment district for the 44th Street
and France Avenue area:
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE DEVELOPMENT
PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 2
AND TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLANS FOR
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS 90 -1, 90 -2
AND 90 -3 MAKING FINDINGS AND REQUESTING
CERTIFICATION OF THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING
DISTRICTS 90 -1, 90 -2, AND 90 -3.
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as
follows:
1. On April 2, 1990, this Council held a public hearing on the designation of
Development District No. 2 (the "Development District ") and the adoption of the
Development Program for Development District No.2 (the "Program ") and on the
adoption of the Tax Increment Financing Plans for Tax Increment. Financing
Districts 90 -1, 90 -2, and 90 -3 (the "Tax Increment Districts "), after notice of
public hearing was published in the official newspaper of the City not less than
10 days prior to the date of the hearing. The City has consulted with its
planning department on the designation of the Development District. All persons
desiring to be heard at the hearing were given an opportunity to express their
views.
2. Copies of the Program and the Tax Increment Financing Plans have been
presented to this Council and are ordered placed on file with the City Clerk. The
forms of the. Program and Tax Increment Financing Plans are hereby approved and are
incorporated herein by reference.
3. The Program and Tax Increment Financing Plans and the designation of the
Development District and establishment of the Tax Increment Financing Districts
are hereby approved.
4. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, subdivision 3, it is
hereby found for the reasons set forth in the Program and Tax Increment Financing
Plans that:
A. Tax Increment Financing Districts 90 -2 and 90 -3 are each in "economic
development district" as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174,
subdivision 12.
B. Tax Increment Financing District 90 -1 is a "redevelopment district" as
defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subdivision 10.
C. The proposed development outlined in the Program in the opinion of this
Council would not occur solely through private investment within the reasonably
foreseeable future and therefor the use of tax increment financing is deemed
necessary,
D. The Tax Increment Financing Plans conform to the general plan for the
development of the City as a whole in that it aids in the development of the
property in the Development District in a manner that alleviates deficiencies in
the Development District as set forth in the Program.
E. The Tax Increment Financing Plans will afford maximum opportunity
consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole for the development of the
area included in the Development District by private enterprise in that it
alleviates deficiencies in the Development District as set forth in the Program.
F. The City elects the method of tax increment computation set forth in
Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, subdivision 3, clause (a).
5. The City Manager is authorized and directed to request that the
- — --
-- appropriate - officials of Hennepin--County- to establish- the- -Tax Increment -Di-str - cts --- - --
for the premises in the City described in the Tax Increment Financing Plans.
Passed by the Council this 2nd day of April, 1990.
Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
The motion was seconded by Council Member Paulus, and upon vote being taken
thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Nays: Kelly
Motion carried.
Council Member Smith made a motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution a
it relates to the establishment of a tax increment district for the Yooddale
Avenue and Valley View Road area. The motion was seconded by Council Member
Rice, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Nays: Kelly
Motion carried.
Council Member Smith made a motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution as
it relates to establishment of a tax increment district for the 70th Street and
Cahill Road area. The motion was seconded by Council Member Rice, and upon vote
being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
*FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAIN FOR 7101 -13 AMUNDSON AVENUE CONTINUED TO 4116/90 Motion
was made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Rice to continue the final
development plan for 71101 -13 Amundson Avenue. George gosmides, generally located
at southeast corner of Cahill Rd and Amundson Av until April 16, 1990.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
REQUEST FOR RELEASE OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS DENIED - SOUTH HARRIET PARR STEINER
ADDITION Planner Craig Larsen gave background of the Harriet Park Steiner
Addition. In March 1986 Council approved a final plat at the intersection of 52nd
Street and Minnehaha Boulevard. That plat created two new lots by breaking off
the rear portion of two lots that were fronting on Minnehaha Blvd. A condition of
that approval was the imposition of private restrictive covenants that would be
imposed prior to the release of building permits on the two lots. Those covenants
were never signed or recorded, consequently staff has refused to issue building
permits for the two lots. Council /Staff received a letter from Mr. Gislason, one
of the two parties of the original plat and he requests the Council remove
restrictions as a condition of the building permits. The restrictions are
structured as a private covenant, seven nearby property owners were given the
standing to enforce the provisions of the covenants. The neighbors were notified
of the request and the hearing before the Council. Specifically within the
Covenants, Section 1, paragraphs A -H set forth design criteria for the houses to
_.__ -be- built...._upon__the_ lots- and _.the_._intent_at the_ time of thos_e_provisions_ was_ to______
insure that the design materials and the scale of the new homes would be similar
to those existing in the neighborhood.
Mr. Robert Gislason, 5205 Minnehaha Blvd., lawyer and 40 year Edina resident,
submitted a letter to Council asking that the Special Building Restrictions be
removed. He stated that when he was asked to join in making the subdivision, by
his neighbors, the only difficulty with this was the lot length with it only being
119' where the code calls for 120'. Lots in the area are generally 60' wide, with
the proposed lots being 76' and 78' wide, 25% sq.ft. greater than what is
required. This is choice land and should be subdivided and put on the tax roles.
Dr. Steiner did appear in 1986 before the Council as he wanted to sell his house
and move to Montana. When Dr. Steiner approached Mr. Gislason, with a long list
of covenants and restrictions, he did not agree with the covenants and would not
sign them. Mr. Gislason believes the covenants to be onerous, and for all
practical purposes these lots seem unmarketable with these covenants in place.
The nine covenants in question are:
A. No more than one family dwelling on each lot
B. Houses shall face and front on West 52nd St.
C. Houses shall have a 40' rear setback and no house shall be within 40' of
the rear boundary of the lot
D. Houses shall not exceed 1 1/2 story in height and shall be not more than
25' at the highest point
E. Roof pitch shall be 6/12 or greater
F. Garages shall be attached, with two stalls; garage floor shall be not
more than 2' above the center line of W. 52nd. St. and follow Edina
Ordinances
G. Materials for exterior shall be brick, shakes, lap siding or a
combination of such. The width of exposed shakes and lap siding shall
not exceed 12"
H. North faces of houses shall be less than 100% glass such that the front
walls of the houses shall not be all glass
Mr. Gislason passed,out copies of two Supreme Court Landmark Cases, June 1, 1962,
No 38,420, T. Joseph Olsen v. City of Minneapolis and May 1, 1959, No. 37,609,
State Ex. Re;. Melville Foster and Another v. City of Minneapolis and Another.
The Foster case dealt with a municipal corporation that may not condition
restricted uses of property upon the consent of private individuals such as the
owners of adjoining property. In that case, 2/3 of the adjacent property owners
tried to stop something. The Olson case dealt with the building of a
filling- station at 58th & Penn. The Court said it seemed obvious that the City's
underlying motive in denying plaintiff the permit, was its conclusion that the
operation of the filling station would violate the neighborhood concept which it
sought to insure. These are choice lots in a nice neighborhood. Mr. Gislason
stated he has not tried to market this land, but has been approached by people who
had gotten his name from City Hall. He stated he feels these lots should be put
in the tax roles the same as all the adjoining land, and feels that the
restrictions are unfair and unlawful.
Member Paulus asked when these covenants were established in .1986, was the legal
opinion that they could stand. Attorney Erickson referred to the minutes attached
of February 3, 1986, these lots were sub - standard, because they were not deep
enough and needed a variance. Within the variance process, the neighbors were
advised of a problem. A meeting was held February 3, 1986, with the neighbors,
City staff and Mr. Steiner. At that point it came before Council as an agreed
upon instance where the parties_ said fine, these conditions are acceptable, accept--------
and approve the plat with these conditions imposed. At that time no research or
opinions were given and no dispute was heard. The initial plat approval was
subject to the obtaining of the recorded conditions, and appears by the time of
the final plat approval, these had not been signed and plat was approved subject
to them not issuing building permits. The same consent was there, it was just
deferred, the way the minutes read. There were no opinions given at that time on
the validity of the restrictions. Mr. Erickson stated he is familiar with the
restrictions cited, restrictive uses may not be conditioned on the consent of
adjoining property owners. He referred to the Olson case Mr. Gislason spoke about
and agreed that you can not deny a requested activity within the ordinance that is
solely based upon the objections of neighbors. This case was not based on
neighborhood approval nor based on ascetics, it was a consent arrangement that
came before the Council. Member Paulus asked if her understanding is that this
arrangement as originally drawn up, could stand in a court of law. Mr. Erickson
said there may well be some problems with the restrictions as framed. The legal
issue did not come from the Council, there was no dispute at the time. He
believes what happened was that the Council imposed these restrictions, based upon
a statement that everything was fine. Whether the Council would have acted and
approved the plat, had there been a dispute was another point. The plat was
approved based upon statement that these conditions would be imposed. Member
Paulus questioned whether the plat would become null and void if these conditions
were not met. Mr. Erickson stated this would be an argument if these conditions
were withdrawn, and the approval was given on the presumption that these
conditions were going. to be there, therefore the plat should. not have been
approved and it may be- .revoked... Member.'Paulus asked whether :;the City Ordinance .
- presently states that no future. single. family homes in. Edina; can be.built with-
only a single: car :garage =and couldn't be grandfathered in for a one garage.
Planner Larsen stated there must :.be -a two -car garage., - Member: Paulus- inquired, if a
person building a home meets all ordinances, would these, plans. be reviewed by. the
Planning Department. Planner Larsen stated that the restr ictions that are before
the Council are a private matter and the City ,is not party.- to. .;If there. .was
a disagreement -, the seven - :panties would have to enforce the covenants. Member
Paulus asked if at 'the time this was discussed back in 1986,,.were all parties part
of the discussion at that-.time. Planner Larsen said.2 parties proposed the plat.
and all dealings were with.Dr. Steiner with no staff contact with the Gislason s.
The City was led to believe that there was an agreement on the proposal. Member
Paulus asked whether Mr. Gislason was aware of or present at discussions going on
about this. Mr. Gislason stated.he was not present, and had no information that
discussions were taking place. His first knowledge of a problem was when he was
asked to sign a document concerning these restrictions and he refused to do so.
Member Paulus inquired about when this happened. He said 2 -3 years ago Member
Paulus asked if he had spoken to Mr. Larsen at that time and asked if he had had a
problem with the original agreement that was drafted. Mr. Gislason stated he
explained his position to Dr. Steiner and left it up to him and said again that he
would not sign it. This has come up now because there is a purchaser that is
interested in one of the lots.
Mancel Mitchell, .5137 Juanita, spoke for himself and a neighbor Maria Beal, 5136
Indianola; Rita Lehnert, speaking for her mother, Mary, 5209 Minnehaha Boulevard;
Carolyn Wenger, 5212 Halifax; spoke in opposition to the lifting of the
restrictive covenants.
Doug Grabham, 5201.Minnehaha offered an apology for bringing up the matter to
_ bin- with. He had a vested as he pays the taxes on the empty lots
Comments heard from the aforementioned residents ranged from the belief being that
anyone interested in building in the area would keep to the spirit and flavor of
the neighborhood and could easily build within these covenants, residents were in
the belief that the City was a party to the process of the drawing up of the
covenants, if the Council chooses to lift these covenants the suggestion was heard
that the whole plat process should be reexamined,
Mayor Richards asked for concerns or questions from the Council.
Member Paulus commented that if these covenant's are removed, it should go back
for variance review. The intent was that the subdivision was granted with the
covenant's riding with it. She asked for clarification from the the planning
department regarding her interpretation of this so that the proponents are aware
that it will go back through the process.
Member Jack Rice asked for clarification on the process. Could anyone buy these .
lots, come in and build on them without a plat being filed. Attorney Erickson
said he has not read the statute lately but believes that a court order would -have
to be acquired to cancel the plat that has already been filed.
Member Peggy Kelly asked what it would take to get a court order and would be very
expensive. Attorney Erickson stated it all depends upon how hard Mr.. Gislason
fights, it could be expensive but depends upon how difficult a task it is on the
defense side. There would have to be some arguments on misrepresentation that -led
the City to do:wha - ' h' did and after these were proven to be :such, the
opportunity should be revoked. Member -Kelly said in.her understanding .that if
these covenant's are lifted; =this is "the - process that would have-to be done.,
Attorney Erickson said no, it is a choice.
Member Rice said if these covenants are rescinded, then we are dependent upon -
someone else doing something to get control back over the process. Mayor- Richards
recalled the action was an approval of a certain action predicated upon certain
events occurring. If one action is removed, the burden is upon the Council.. The
staff was instructed not to issue a building permit until those covenant's were
filed. If the covenant's are removed, the position seems that the staff is free
to issue the building permit. If we.do not agree with that point of view then the
action we have taken stands. If.Council agrees the action taken stands.
Member Jane Paulus commented that if you want to see how ridiculous the covenants
are, speak to the people who live in the Country Club area. Someone can purchase
a lot, say these are the plans that they are going to build on the lot, but are
not legally tied in to those plans, once the lot is purchased. There is no
safeguard because Planner Larsen has seen the plans to say to the neighborhood
they have a guarantee that the house will fit in when it goes up..
Member Kelly inquired about her understanding that these covenant's were between
the people involved and the process.
Mayor Richards commented that we had a difference of opinion regarding whether a
variance should be granted. Before we got down to the merits of granting or not
granting a variance, a consensus. was presented to the Council by the then affected
__property_ owners, putting these 8 restrictions on the property. There was no _
objection to the property being platted or replatted.
Member Rice asked if on that basis the Council assumed this was the case. Mayor
Richards said he does not know how he would have thought on the variance but knew
when everyone was in agreement, and differs some with Mr. Gislason's viewpoint.
Mayor Richards does not consider this onerous enough to diminish the market value
of the property. Character and symmetry of the neighborhood is always examined to
see if development is consistent with regulations. Mayor Richards said the way he
sees this situation is to assure that what is being proposed, is what the end
result would be. He stated that is the way he voted in 1986, and plans to vote as
such this evening.
Member Paulus asked Mayor Richards if he had any problem with legal issues on this
issue standing. Mayor Richards said he does not use the word legally, but knows
where he stands in voting with what is right or wrong. Member Paulus again said
that she has no problem with this, but hears that if it stands, feels that the
City will be legally challenged... -Mayor Richards stated he would not change his
mind because of a possible suit against the City.
Member Rice thinks he is hearing that everyone wants to maintain character and
symmetry, maintain the neighborhood, etc., if this stands and someone who wishes
to build on this property, and must follow the covenants, is the City in a
position to allow this to happen or not. Attorney Erickson said no. At the time
it was set -up, it was established that surrounding neighbors were the enforcing
entities. If they comply with their building code, they are entitled to a
building permit, but if they don't comply with these, the neighbors could say they
did not comply with them and must. Member Rice stated that it would be up to the
neighbors to take the action to stop-or go ahead with building.
Mayor Richards stated there are a number of choices but the three that surface
are:
1. Affirm the action taken by a previous Council saying that no building
permit should be issued until these restrictions are placed at record. Which in
effect carries forwbLrd those conditions seen as set forth.
2. Accept the current proponents request to remove and release those
restrictions altogether. If that is the decision of the Council, then suggest
that the related issue be addressed whether or not the City should take action to
unwind the approval of the replat and the filing of that replat to go back and
address the fact of variance being necessary to develop the lots that have been
created out of the replat. Or take the action that this does not need to be done,
the replat would be filed. In effect the City's staff should issue a building
permit upon compliance with all building requirements for detached single family
residence rezoning.
3. Do not deal with it, refer it back to the Planning Commission or for
continuance if additional information is needed.
Member Smith stated that the proponent could go back and negotiate with the
property owners that are affected by this agreement that goes with the land by
virtue of the platting, and try to get modifications that are deemed necessary and
bring that revision back to Council and then go forth and enforce their
restriction. If he neighbors wanted to modify this plan they may. Mr. Smith
stated he is thinks things should be as they are, and that Mr. Gislason should try
to work with the neighbors, if they at that time want to revise it they may. Mr.
Smith _said he would vote to let it stand.
Member Smith made a motion to deny the request to remove the restrictive covenants
from the South Harriet Park Steiner Addition and a second to the motion was given
by Member Paulus.
Member Rice stated he would support the motion, however if Mr. Gislason came back
in the future and said he was able to negotiate all but one item on the list, and
no one is responsive to that, he might have a different attitude about it.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
Mayor Richards commented that the action taken in March, 1986 stands.
* LOT DIVISIONS APPROVED AT 7021 vE%FORD RD AND 7028 AND 7100 DOWN ROAD AND LOT
DIVISIONS AT 6124 AND 6128 EWING AV SO APPROVED Notion was made by Member Smith
and was seconded by Member Rice for adoption of the following resolution:
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the following described tracts of land constitute various separate
parcels:
PJ
Lot 12, PROSPECT HILLS, and
Lot 2, Block 1, GRIFFITH ADDITION, and
Lot 1, Block 1, SCHEY'S PARR VIEW 2ND ADDITION
WHEREAS, the owners of the above tracts of land desire to subdivide said tracts'.
into the following described new and separate parcels (herein called "Parcels "):
- Lot 12, PROSPECT HILLS, except that part of Lot 12, PROSPECT-HILLS lying
southeasterly of -a line running from a point in the -easterly'lini -of Wexford
Road distant 67.26 feet - southerly measured along said easterly-line, from the
southwesterly- corner of Lot 13 said PROSPECT HILLS, to .a point in the
northeasterly line of said`Lot- 13,- distant 50.00 feet'- northwesterly, measured
along said northeasterly line,-from the southeasterly corner of said Lot 13
and lying westerly of a line drawn from a point on the above described line
distant .97.08 feet northeasterly along said line from-the easterlyl` line of
Wexford Road to a point on the south line of said Lot 12 distant 139.81 feet
easterly along said south.line from the most westerly corner of said Lot 12.
Subject to easements of record, if any; and
Lot 2, Block 1, GRIFFITH ADDITION, and that part of Lot 12, PROSPECT HILLS
lying southeasterly of a line running from a point in the easterly line of
Wexford Road distant 67.26 feet southerly measured along said easterly line,
from the southwesterly corner of Lot 13 said PROSPECT HILLS, to a point in
the northeasterly line of said Lot 139 distant 50.00 feet northwesterly,
measured along said northeasterly line,.from the southeasterly corner of said
Lot 13 and lying westerly of a line drawn from a point on the above describe
line distant 97.08 -feet northeasterly along said line from the easterly line
of Wexford Road to a point on the south line of said Lot 12 distant 139.81
feet easterly along said south line from the most westerly corner of said Lot
12. Except the east 54.03 feet as measured at right angles to the east line
thereof. Subject to easements of record, if any; and
Lot 1, Block 1, SCHEY'S PARR VIED 2ND ADDITION, and the east.54.03 feet, as
measured at right angles to the east line, of the following described
property: That part of Lot 12, PROSPECT HILLS lying southeasterly of a line
running from a point in the easterly line of Wexford Road distant 67.26 feet
southerly, measured along said easterly line, from the southwesterly corner
of Lot 13 said PROSPECT HILLS, to a point in the northeasterly line of said
Lot 13, distant 50.00 feet northwesterly, measured along said northeasterly
line, from the southeasterly corner of said Lot 13 and lying westerly of a
line drawn from a point on the above described line distant 97.08 feet
northeasterly along said line from the easterly line of.Wexford Road to a
point on the south line of said Lot 12 distant 139.81 feet easterly along
said south line from the most westerly corner of said Lot 12. Subject to
easements of record, if any.
WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning
Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said
Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the
Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinances
Nos. 804 and 825; -
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina
that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is
hereby-approved and the- requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 804 and
Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof
as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any
other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further
subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent
ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may
be provided for by those ordinances.
ADOPTED this 2nd day of April, 1990.
RESOLUTION
vHERM, the following described -tracts of land constitute various separate
parcels:
Lot 3, Block 1, ENGLEHARDT'S ADDITION, and
Lot 1, Block 1, FARHER'S SECOND ADDITION
SEAS, the owners of the above tracts of land desire to subdivide said tracts
into the following described new and separate parcels (herein called "Parcels "):
Lot 3, Block 1, ENGLEHARDT'S ADDITION, except the south 5 feet, and
Lot 1, Block 1, FARMER'S SECOND ADDITION, and the south 5 feet of Lot 3,
Block 1, ENGLEHARDT'S ADDITION; and
vHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning
Regulations of the City of Edina will. create an unnecessary hardship and said
Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the
Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinances
Nos. 804 and 825;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina
that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is
hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 804 and
Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof
as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any
other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further
subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent
ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may
be provided for by those ordinances.
ADOPTED this 2nd day of April, '1990.
DECISION OF BOARD OF APPEALS OVERTURNED* SIDEYARD SETBACK VARIANCE GRANTED - 4420
VANDERVORK AV Associate Planner Phil Dommer gave background on the appeal of the
decision by the Edina Board of Appeals to deny a 1.5 foot sideyard setback
variance in case B -90 -9. The Board met March 15, 1990, to review the subject
variance. At issue is a sideyard setback which is a typical situation which we
have in the City, where as the building gets taller, the sideyard setback
requirement is increased by 1 1/2' on both sides of the house. The Board of
Appeals heard this request, reviewed testimony from the proponent and decided to
deny the request. The proponent is here tonight with her designer if there are
any questions. Mayor Richards called for questions from the audience. Mayor
Richards asked the proponent to speak.
Star Marie Anderson - Atwater, a 10 year resident at 4420 Vandervork Av., stated
that in March, Mr. Dommer told her that a home in her neighborhood had a variance
when it was built and her home will resemble this home when her addition is
completed. Ms. Anderson - Atwater added there are 7 houses on her block, 4
two -story and 3 one - story. She said her neighbors have no objection to the plans,
after examining them. One neighbor adjoining has one window on the side facing
the Anderson - Atwater home and the neighbor on the other side has only one win
being a bathroom window. She said she has two children and needs room and it
would be more expensive to put the addition in 1 1/2' ft.
Mayor Richards opened.up the meeting for comments on why this variance should not
be granted.
Member -Kelly asked if any neighbors were in the audience.:that would speak to-this
issue. She-noted-she has - driven- around the area . a:- lot today -and-commented that
this is -a unique ::area in that the back yard is a.wetland,.across :the street=is - =a
park - -and it- is, east- - west- facing so no blocking light out- with 2 -story houses next
toi the one story--houses-. -She said she wished she could hear the neighbors state
they have no objection to this addition, but after her' examining._ of the area she
stated she could allow this variance to.be granted:
Member Paulus asked'of Mr. Dommer whether we got-any comments at the time the
original variance was heard. Associate Planner Dommer commented that there were
no comments heard, either at the hearing or by letter.
Member Smith asked Mr. Dommer if these neighbors have ever signed off. Mr. Dommer
said no, that it is not required that neighbors sign; _their opportunity to make.
their feelings heard is at.the hearing, and.they received a notice about that.
Member Smith - inquired if there is a way of indicating agreement with the
proponents statement that the neighbors do not object. Mr. Dommer stated he did
not know this for sure.
Ms. Anderson- Atwater commented that one neighbor's son who does painting and
wallpapering and wants to do the work. Member Smith wanted more evidence that the
neighbors were all right with this addition. Mayor Richards stated that all the
City can do is send notices and give people the opportunity to participate.
Member Smith stated the Council does not know what the residents think and
expressed concern.
Mayor Richards called for the pleasure of the Council.
Member Kelly made the motion to allow the variance to be granted and the decision
of the Board of Appeals for the sideyard setback at 4420 Vandervork Av be
overturned and a second to the motion was made by Member Smith. Member Paulus
wished the minutes to read that no neighbors were present at the variance meeting
and at the public hearing April 2, 1990, nor was there any public comment noted.
Member Kelly said if that was to be included that it should be noted that at the
Board. of Appeals meeting the vote was a 2 to 2 vote which failed because the lack
of majority.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
fh
*HEAR naG DATE OF 4116190 SET FOR PLANNING MATTERS Motion was made by Member Smith
and was seconded by Member Rice to set April 16, 1990, as hearing date for the
following Planning matters:
1) Final Rezoning - R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to PRD -2, Ron Clark
Construction
2) -Final Plat Approval - Highcrof t -Addition, Ron Clark Construction
3) Preliminary Rezoning Approval - PCD -4 Planned Commercial District to PCD -2
Planned Commercial District - palgreen's by Semper Holdings - 4916 France Avenue
South
4) Preliminary Plat Approval of R -2 Double Dwelling Unit District to PRD -2,
Planned Residential District - Schaefer Development
5) Final Development Plan - Opus Corporation - Western National Mutual Insurance -
5350 W. 78th St., 5309 Industrial Boulevard - Building Expansion
6) Final Development Plan for 6969 France Av. S. - Gabbert and Beck Building
Expansion
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE RELATING TO ON -SALE NINE LICENSE AMENDMENT GRANTED
City Manager Rosland gave background information about the wine Ordinance 902 -A1.
Council adopted the wine licensing ordinance on April 1, 1985, which allowed sales
of wine only in qualifying restaurants. Sec. 43 of the ordinance provided for
automatic termination of all previously issued licenses and also stated that no
licenses shall be issued after July 1, 1990. There are 3 options:
1. Extend the sunset provision to a future date.
2. Repeal the sunset provision as-stated in Sec. 43.
3. Take no action and hold a public hearing
Staff has no objections to wine licensing, it has gone well as a general rule,
with getting paperwork done the only problem and not with wine as a public
nuisance problem.
Member Kelly made the motion to eliminate the sunset provision on Ordinance No.
902 -A1. A second to the motion was made by Member Smith. Member Smith asked of
Attorney Erickson what the effect would be with the elimination of the sunset
provision. Attorney Erickson stated that at any time the ordinance could be
amended, delete or cancel or do' whatever is wished. Member Smith asked if this
would condemn anyone's right to sell wine. Attorney Erickson stated that liquor
licenses were not considered a property right so are not subject to claims for
taking them away. Mayor Richards opened up the meeting for questions. Member
Smith asked if this was the appropriate time to strengthen things or fine people
if they don't acquire training. Mayor Richards this is perhaps an appropriate
_
comment. but a more appropriate_ time to this would_ be when the general
ordinance is being dealt with.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
CONCERN OF RESIDENT REGARDING WALNUT RIDGE PARK CONTINUED TO 4/16190 Manager
Rosland suggested that the Walnut Ridge Park discussion be continued to April 16,
1990, because the concerned resident is away on vacation.
DISCUSSION HELD ON PRIVATE PARKING LOTS AT FAZRVIEO SOUTHDAI.E HOSPITAL AND
SOUTHDALE MEDICAL CLINIC At the March 5, 1990, meeting, staff had presented
information on existing Edina ordinances that would apply to regulation of private
parking lots. Following that discussion, it was a consensus of the Council that
staff bring back further information for discussion regarding additional action
the City could consider.
Planner Larsen has provided the following information in his memo of April 2,
1990. The City of Minneapolis requires a license for all parking lots containing
10 or more parking spaces. All parking lots are subject to design standards and
are reviewed by the Department of Public
Works. Commercial parking lots, those
charging for parking, are subject.to further
requirements, including signage and
stacking spaces. All parking lot licenses
are granted by the Minneapolis City
Council. Key elements of the ordinance
relating to Commercial Lots are:
EDINA ORDINANCE
MINNEAPOLIS ORDINANCE
Edina requires no license
1. Licenses required for all parking
lots containing 10 or more spaces
- Free Parking: License for initial
application only
- Commercial lots:- Yearly license
required, Fee between $100 -$300
2. Performance Requirements:
All Parking Lots:
A. Yes
A. Hard surface required
B. Yes
B. Setbacks required
C. Yes
C. Landscaping & screening required
D. Yes
D. Design and layout subject to
approval of City Engineer
No Ordinance Requirement
3. Stacking spaces at entrance
(Note: Stacking spaces were required
1 space for self -serve ticket vendor
for review by City Engineer
and 3 or 4 for attended lots
No Requirements
No Ongoing or Periodic
inspections required.
4. Sign Requirements
A. Name & phone # of licensee
B. Hours of operation
C. Rates, including minimum rate and
maximum rate for 12 and 24 hours.
D. Size of signs defined in Ordinance
5. Inspections. Authorized as deemed
necessary by Department of Licenses.
Manager Rosland stated that staff had met with the Cambridge Group to make it safe
parking. The stance took by the staff is that Cambridge in theory has the right
to do what they want with their property. The responsibility of the City is to
protect public safety. Staf:E► s met with them on a number of occasions, the ity
engineers have reviewed it, Hennepin County because of 66th Street has reviewed it
also. The engineering and fire staff has been monitoring the lot, with regard to
stacking on the public streets and emergency vehicles. Manager Rosland noted he
had personally visited the lot which was approximately 50 -60% full. He exited on
66th Street but noted about 35 cars parked in the Southdale area, obviously were
parked there for Southdale Medical which is a safety concern.
Mayor Richards opened up the discussion to the public. The following spoke in
opposition to paid parking that the owners of the Southdale Medical Building have
implemented:
Sarah Foss, resident of Richfield; Gordon Hendrickson, 5708 Upton Av. S.; Paul
Belvedeere, DDS tenant of Southdale Medical Building; Doneta Hoffman, 5825 St.
John's Av., Leanne Tillman, 8370 Red Rock Road, Eden Prairie; Roberta Thorp,
resident of Edina; Dr. William Wright, 6621 Sally Dr., retired pediatrician; DouL
Lambert, DDS, 6205 Hansen Road; Paul Mullin, owner of Foto -Lab in Southdale
Medical Building; Gary Bolmgren, resident of Richfield; and Glenn Hendrickson.
t
Objections and concerns voiced included: paying for parking at both the hospital
and medical building, access for emergency vehicles, concern for non- ambulatory
patients, building safety, lack of communication between building, owners and
tenants, permanent completion of the lot, no means of dropping- off /picking -up of
people, fear of patient and /or doctor egress...- Safety for patients choosing to
park in the Southdale Center lot and crossing- 66th Street to-the Medical Building
was expressed-by several- persons as well as-- safety of pedestriains entering the.
building from the lot.
Mayor Richards asked what has'been done about access to -the- building for - emergency
vehicles in the public - right -of- way. -- Manager Rosland explained that the area had
been examined by the Police and Fire Departments,- .i ".e., curbs-
urbs; ;etc. as to adequate
access. Two -areas previously mentioned as temporary drive -ovens are exactly that,
and will be changed when.weather allows construction. One lady has been hit on
the Southdale Center perimeter road coming from the medical building. As .the
parking lot is now, no one can be dropped off.at the front door, however if you
drive in and stay less than .15 minutes there is no charge.
Planner Larsen then summarized the differences between Edina's ordinance
requirements and the Minneapolis Ordinance. Licensing requirements do not
preclude someone from choosing to charge for parking, no communities were found
that prohibit charging. Mayor Richards asked the City Attorney, if there would be
legal impositions for Edina if the City were to adopt an ordinance to preclude
someone from charging for parking on private property. Attorney Erickson stated
that City Ordinances must be related to the health, safety and welfare of the
community. This charge or no- charge would have to be tied to the existence of a
health or safety factor. If charging begins and it becomes more of.a safety risk,
there.may be some reason to impose an ordinance restriction. Some nexus would
have to be found between the ordinance and the activity.being governed.
Member Paulus asked, if the City were to establish an ordinance regulating parking
lots after the fact, could we require those standards then to be met. Attorney
Erickson commented that Edina has fought that issue with building codes, where a
new building code is adopted, and existing buildings must.comply. This has been
__— won -on - _a- heal- th-safe-ty_. issue- ,__i....e_ sprinkler__in_a._b.asement _ s_o_._f.ir_efighter s__don't___ -.____
get caught in smoky areas. This could possibly be done if it. is a health- safety
feature, otherwise it could be a non - conforming use grandfathered in.
Member Smith whether crossing of 66th Street by pedestrians could be characterized
as a life- saving issue. Attorney Erickson stated no, rather the actual use of the
lot, by virtue of charging, may make it a safety factor. Member Smith asked
whether the City can regulate a drop -off access. Attorney Erickson said yes, if
it were in the public street where it might back up traffic and result in people
getting hurt. This may well have the connection between regulation and the
health- safety feature it entails. Member Smith asked if.it is necessary in every
building to have a public -free access to an automobile without. charge. Attorney.
Erickson said, no, not without charge but all Edina's code requires all buildings
to have access to public streets. Member Paulus asked if that could be an
ordinance requirement. Attorney Erickson said again only if it has a
health - safety factor to it. Just because the lot does not have free access it
does not necessarily indicate a safety feature. It could be stated that people
could not be dropped off in the public streets, or areas that otherwise would be.
posted for no- parking or no- stopping. If there was parking on the street, it
would be difficult to stop and unload someone. If it were a non -stop, non -park
area, it could be said you cannot unload people in those types of zones,.and it
could be posted as such.
Member Paulus commented that this is private property and that the issue as to
charging is their decision. She again stated her concern over the stacking of
cars in the lot, _the crossovers and the traffic flow. This is one of biggest
health- -safety hazards that needs correcting. Signage should state that people
using the lot for parking must have cash upon exiting.
Member Smith stated he --recently doctored at: another facility with a family member .
that had paid parking and did not like it. However it was a part of the facility,
and was out of his control. There is no regulation that.states you- cannot charge .
for parking-. He felt.there could be better access for emergency vehicles. Also
that the building owners should have been given.the tenants more notice on the
paid parking. If the concern is safety, this is an item that can be addressed by
the Council, but an ordinance cannot be designed saying someone cannot charge for
parking.
Member Kelly asked whether this would.be brought back as a draft ordinance, or
whether this would be open for discussion again. She stressed the importance of
the safety issue, the need for a charge for licensing, and,said a lot of employee
time had been spent on this issue and the City should be reimbursed.
Member Rice suggested that an ordinance be pursued. Cambridge came into Edina,
acted fast and the City had no ordinance permitting or not allowing paid parking
or licensing to happen. He stated if we were starting with a vacant lot, there
would certainly have been more than 24 hours to consider its approval. He
mentioned other paid parking facilities in the area; however they all have a
pick -up /drop -off access. Member Rice said he felt the situation will improve.
The marketplace will tell Cambridge if their decision was good or bad. The
tenants are upset and have communicated that to the owner. If many leave the
building, the owners will rethink their position.on paid parking. Safety is the
major concern, but staff feels it is a safe access .even though it looks awkward.
There is a feeling that not everything needs to be regulated but if, there are
going to be commercial parking lots in the City, there must be some control over
them, i.e, a process and reimbursement for the process.
Mayor Richards in summation said that safety seems to be the biggest concern, and
along with that, regulations about how we would license and inspect, and how we
would see parking lots function. Whether to charge or not to charge should not be
the issue focused on. Access questions have been raised, emergency and
health- safety issues also have been discussed. Mayor Richards asked that staff
draft an ordinance that would address the issues raised to be brought to Council
on May 7, 1990, to which the Council concurred. He also suggested that Cambridge
be notified of the meeting. Member Smith suggested that Cambridge be notified of
the concern for clear access to the front door for drop- off /pick -up.
Dr. Belvedeere asked if he could submit a video tape that he has made of the
parking lot entrances which might help to make a decision. Mayor Richards said
that any information which might help in the decision - making process, should be
submitted to the City staff.
BID AWARDED FOR TOW TRUCK WITH RECOVERY UNIT Public Works Director Francis
Hoffman explained this request was continued from March 5, 1990, meeting. He
i
r
L`.
noted the attachments in the packet and that the funds come from Central Services
which means other departments benefit from this purchase also. Questions brought
up about this truck were how often it was used, for just towing and not servicing
or what. He explained that towing costs the City approximately $3,000- $4,000
annually. This includes Public Works, and the Police and Fire Departments.
During a really cold winter this could be up to $2,000 more per year. Director
Hoffman commented that this appears to be an expensive vehicle, -but over 15 years
it appears this -would pay for itself. Member Kelly said this is a budgeted-item.
Member Kelly made a motion to award the bid to purchase the Challenger Model 5601
tow truck from Twin City's Wrecker Sales in the amount of $69,940.00. A second to
the motion was given by Member Rice.
Member Paulus stated this is an awesome amount of money to pay for one tow truck,
is still grateful that she questioned the cost. Director Hoffman commented that
this is not even the cream of the crop vehicle and is very standard. The Public
Works Department did not request specifications for a super rig.
Member Smith asked if there was a possibility of sharing this with another suburb.
Director Hoffman said the service could be offered and they could use it. The
Police and Fire have mutual aid, and the possibility could be looked into it. He
told that Bloomington has two huge super trucks, completely out of Edina's league.
Member Rice stated that 3 or 4 staff people said that we need this truck, and he
concurs with them.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Richards
Nays: Smith
Motion carried.
*BID AWARDED FOR SAND ROCK, BITQMINOUS MATERIAL, CONCRETE Notion made by
Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bids to recommended low
bidders as follows: Sand (delivered) to Prior Lake Aggregate at $3.03 per ton;
Buckshot (delivered) to Model Stone at $8.35 per ton; Limestone Class II
(delivered) to Edward Kraemer & Sons for $5.30 per ton; Seal Coat Chips
(delivered) to Dresser Trap Rock for $13.25 per ton; Plant Asphalt #2331 (picked
up) to Commercial Asphalt for $16.20 per ton; Asphalt 2331 Fine �icke� -up) to
Midwest Asphalt at $19.10 per ton; Asphalt #2341 (picked -up) to Midwest Asphalt at
$19.20 per ton; Asphalt Winter Mix (picked -up) to Midwest Asphalt for $39.00 per
ton; Concrete (delivered) to Model Stone for $44.00 cu.yd.; Cut Back Asphalt
(delivered) to Koch Refining at .708 per gallon.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
*BID AWARDED FOR ONE REVERSIBLE SNOW PLOW AND WING Motion was made by Member
Smith and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for one reversible snow
plow and wing to recommended low bidder, LaHaas Manufacturing & Sales, at
$10,558.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
*BID AWARDED FOR ONE 1990 FORD F -800 LIFT TRUCK WITH AN AERIAL BUCKET Motion was
made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for one 1990
Ford F -800 lift truck with an aerial bucket to recommended low bidder, Road
Machinery & Supply for $67,108.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
*BID AWARDED FOR PARKING LOT RECONSTRUCTION AT BRAEKAR GOLF COURSE Motion was
made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for parking
lot reconstruction at the Braemar Golf Course to recommended low bidder Alber
Construction for $168,951.20.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
*BID AWARDED FOR BRAEKAR SOCCER FIELD RENOVATION Motion was made by Member Smith
and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for the renovation of the Braemar
Soccer Field to recommended low bidder, Perkins Landscape for $9,789.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes.
I -494 EIS UPDATE GIVEN Engineer Francis Hoffman gave an update of what has been
done so far. Information and evaluating is being done on alternatives for I -494.
The first area of review is immediately south of Edina between TH 100 and old
County Road 18. City staff is working the Mn /DOT, Hennepin County, consultant and
other cities staff to develop and reduce the number of alternatives in each area
that should be studied in detail. Mayor Richards extended thanks to Director
Hoffman and Member Paulus for monitoring this process. The Mayor asked Director
Hoffman to report back to Council again with periodic updates. No action
required.
VACANCY NOTED ON RECYCLING COMIIISSION Mayor Richards noted that a vacancy exists
on the Recycling Commission as Ken Joyce is unable to accept appointment that was
done March 5, 1990, to fill the partial term to 2/1/91. The Mayor explained he
has one name submitted to him, and if the Council has names of interested people
to submit those to him.' His intention is to appoint someone to fill this vacancy
by the April 16, 1990, meeting. In addition, it was noted by the Mayor that there
is also a vacancy on the Board of Appeals.
REPORT GIVEN ON DOG LICENSING PROCESS - CONTINUED TO APRIL 16 1990 REGULAR
COUNCIL MEETING Mayor Richards commented the information requested at a previous
Council meeting had been received from Chief Craig Swanson regarding the Edina
process on dog licensing. The Mayor opened up discussion on the process. By
consensus of the Members, this ,item will be on the April 16, 1990, agenda.
- -- -- -PROPOSED- 1990 -- --PROJECTED-
STORM- -WATER IMPROV KENNTS- AUTHORIZATION -TO- BID- CONTIPUED -TO
APRIL 16 1990.
REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING Director Hoffman
gave background on
proposed stormwater projects to be constructed during 1990
to be funded from the
stormwater utility
as follows:
Section I:
W. 76th St. & Parklawn, Edina Lake Park
$ 9,040.00
Section II:
Edina Manor- Grimes & Halifax Avenues
South of W. 58th St.
56,492.00
Section IIA:
Edina Manor - Grimes & Halifax Avenues
from MH CB #4 to MH #5
17,902.00
Section III:
Sunnyside Av. & Browndale Av. to Creek
97,885.50
Section IV:
W. 64th St between Xerxes and Pond
37,795.00
Section V.
Yorktown Park Strip from Adams Hill Pond
105.016.00
TOTAL
$324,130.50
Director Hoffman said some neighbors in the Halifax /Grimes area are under the
belief that those projects will cause problems for them. Mayor Richards said
those projects would be open for discussion on April 16, 1990, when bids are
awarded. Member Kelly asked whether the Grimes /Halifax area was the area with
flooding problems during the 1987 storm. Director Hoffman said no, the area that
had the bad flooding was just north of 58th & Woodcrest.
Member Bice moved to authorise bids for the projects as presented with the
exception of Sections II and Ilk and moved adoption of the following Resolution:
RESOLUTION APPROVING'PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND
DIRECTING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
FOR STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS SOS. ,STS-199, STS -200,
STS 201, STS -202 A SfiS -203
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA:
1. The plans and specifications for the proposed improvements set forth in the
following Advertisement for Bids form, heretofore prepared by the City Engineer,
and now on file in the office of the City Clerk are hereby approved.
2. The Clerk shall, cause to be published in the Edina Sun and Construction
Bulletin the following notice of bids for improvements:
(Official Publication)
CITY OF EDINA
4801 W. 50th Street
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS
STORM SEfiEB
CONTRACT 90 -6 (ENG)
is IMPROVEMENT NOS STS -199. STS -200. STS -201
STS -202 & STS -203
BIDS CLOSE APRIL 12, 1990
Bids will be received and opened in the Council Chambers in Edina City Hall, 4801
Nest 50th Street at 11:00 A.M.., Thursday, April 12, 1990. The Edina City Council
will meet at 7:00 P.M., Monday, April 16, 1990, to consider said bids. The
following are approximate major quantities:
1 EA Storm Water Lift Station
11 EA Catch Basins
1,646 LF 16" D.I.P. Force Main
238 LF 6" D.I.P. Force Main
1,490 SY Sod
458 TONS Mn/DOT 2341 Bituminous
1,326 TONS Cl. 5A Gravel
Bids shall be in a sealed envelope with a statement thereon shoving the work
covered by the bid. Bids should be addressed to the City Engineer, City of Edina,
4801 West 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota, 55424, and may be mailed or submitted
personally to the City Engineer. Bids received by the City Engineer, either
through the mail or by personal submission, after the time set for receiving them
may be returned unopened.
work must be done as described in plans and specifications on file in the office
of the City Clerk. Plans and specifications are available for a deposit of $25.00
(by check) at the Edina City Hall Engineering Department. Said deposit to be
returned upon return of plans and specifications with a bona fide bid. No bids
will be considered unless sealed and accompanied by bid bond or certified check
payable to the City of Edina in the amount of at lest ten (10) percent of all
bids. All plans mailed, enclose separate check for $5.00 payable to the City of
Edina for postage and handling.
BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL.
Marcella M. Daehn
City Clerk
A second to -the motion was made by Member Smith. Mayor Richards asked if there
are storm sewer projects requested that are not being proposed at this time.
Director Hoffman said staff -is now working on the largest-project which is the
Rolling Green area. Mayor Richards said the Council should be made aware of any
proposed projects so they could respond to questions from residents.
OPENINGS ON THE MWCC GENERAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE NOMINATION NOTED Mayor Richards
brought to the attention of the Council the need for nominations to the
Metropolitan Waste Control Commission General Advisory Committee of elected
officials and stated that applications would be welcome until mid - April.
ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITIES NOMINATIONS TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
WANTED FOR MAY 16, 1990 ANNUAL MEETING Mayor Richards asked if Council Members
had any interest in being nominated for the Board of Directors for the AMM, and
contact these organizations directly.
LETTER RECEIVED FROM RESIDENT MARY ANN MACLENNAN DISCUSSED Member Paulus shared
that she had received a letter from Mary Ann MacLennan stating her concerns
regarding variances and what is happening in the Country Club District as far as
lot sizes, historical places and zoning. Manager Rosland said he would ask the
Planning Department to phone her and discuss her concerns.
to
PHONE CONVERSATION HELD BETWEEN SARAH JONES OF THE SCHOOL DISTRICT AND MAYOR
RICHARDS REGARDING TAX INCREMENT FINANCING IN CONNECTION WITH THE REFERENDUM
Mayor Richards gave background that there was correspondence in the summer of
_ _1989, speaking about the School Board adopting a resolution requesting the Edina
-- City Council to rebate the excess tax increment revenue result ng rom the 1�
referendum for the fiscal year 1989 -90 and annually thereafter. Subsequently,
Mayor Richards told Sarah Jones to submit additional information. Mayor Richards
has received a letter from James Hamann, the Director of Business Services for the
School District, asking the request be added to the agenda of April 16, 1990.
LETTERS RECEIVED FROM ELECTED OFFICIALS REIATIVE TO PENDING LEGISIATION Mayor
Richards stated he had heard from all three of the legislators, Senator Storm, and
Representatives Pauly and Forsythe, noting their position on the tax increment
financing bills and the pay equity issues on comparable worth. Mayor Richards
added he would supply copies to all Council Members plus staff, and it should be
noted that they have responded and acknowledged our positions.
DECISION MADE BY COUNTY ON COMPOSTING TO BE DISCUSSED APRIL 16, 1990 Manager
Rosland noted that Hennepin County had made a decision on composting. This will
discussed further on April 16, 1990, when the Council meets jointly with the
Recycling Commission 6:00 P.M.
dK
STATE LEGISLATURE (SENATE) ATTEMPTS TO PASS BILL THAT EDINA WOULD LASE $210.000 IN
GAS TAX MONEY Manager Rosland stated the Senate is attempting to pass a bill that
would mean Edina would lose $210,000 in gas tax money. He stated that Edina is
considered a big City with only a few other Cities named, but Edina has.been the
focus, and feel Edina is not participator. Manager Rosland said he -had spoken to ;.
the AMM and the MLC. They are working hard to:--remove this from.the bill: Mayor
- -Richards suggested that letters-be written- to..the various .. bodies we support
financially that lobby on behalf of equity', and -fairness, and make. sure: they clearly'.
understand our position. They must-be made aware of the situation and be- asked. -_to-
lobby against the - adoption of that legislation.. Manager:Rosland commented that
two out of the three organizations contacted him this morning and said -they would
did not vote to 'o in these organizations,. '
defend= the City" if. that is the type of
representation.we receive: The legislative delegation.should be advised =about
this.
JOINT MEETING TO BE HELD APRIL 16 1990 WITH RECYCLING COMMISSION A joint meeting
of the Recycling Commission and the Council will be held at 6:00 P.M. preceding
the regular Council meeting April 16, 1990:
CLOSED MEETING CALLED TO DISCUSS LABOR NEGOTIATIONS AFTER ADJOURNMENT Manager
Rosland said there would be a closed meeting that by law must be approved by the
Council, after the adjournment of this meeting to discuss labor negotiations that
are going on right now with three unions. Motion made by Member Smith to hold
closed meeting following the adjournment of the regular Council Meeting to discuss
labor negotiations. A second to the motion was by Member Kelly.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
*CLAIMS PAID Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice to
approve payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register
dated 4/2/90 and consisting of 25 pages: General Fund $191,458.21, Communications
$6,122.13, Art Center $7,180.76, Capital Fund $1,149.00, Golf Course Fund
$32,206.97, Recreation Center Fund $8,385.54, Edinborough Park $8,609.16, Utility
Fund $249,023.35, Liquor Dispensary Fund $7,076.66, Construction Fund .$1,197.75,
TOTAL $512,409.53 and for confirmation of payment of the following claims as shown
_ in detail on the Check Register dated 2/28/90 and_consis_t_ing of 18 pages General_ _
Fund $364,012.68, Art Center $1,354.50, Swimming Pool Fund $289.99, Golf Course
Fund $14,792.15, Recreation Center Fund $15,269.03, Gun Range Fund $604.44,
Edinborough Park $14,454.20, Utility Fund $20,007.41, Storm Sewer Utility $476.61,
Liquor Dispensary.Fund $219,974.74, TOTAL $651,235.75.
Motion carried on rollcall vote five ayes.
There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Richards declared the
meeting adjourned at 11:15 P.M.
Acting City Clerk
Z
ch
it
lose
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
Agenda Item #
v.D.'
From: GORDON L. HUGHES
Consent
❑
-
Information Only
❑
Date: JANUARY 2, 1990
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
Subject:
Fx-1
To Council
TAX INCREMENT DISTRICTING
Action
❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
•
❑
Ordinance
El
Discussion
Recommendation: -
Info /Background:
See attached memorandum's of December 27, 1989, and December 14, 1989.
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
M E M O R A N D U M
December 27, 1989
Kenneth Rosland
City Manager
Gordon L. Hughes
HRA Executive Director
PRELIMINARY WORK PROGRAM - ESTABLISHMENT OF TAX INCREMENT
FINANCING DISTRICTS FOR RETAIL AREAS
In accordance with the Council's request, we have developed a preliminary
plan and schedule for establishing tax increment financing (T.I.F.)
districts.comprising certain retail areas. These areas include
44th /France, Wooddale & Valley View Road and 70th & Cahill. All other
retail areas in Edina currently fall within existing T.I.F. districts.
T.I.F. DISTRICT ESTABLISHMENT
My memo to you of December 14, 1989, (copy attached) describes some of the
important legal and financial considerations of tax increment financing.
Based on these considerations, I recommend the following strategy:
o Establish T.I.F. districts as soon as possible, preferably by
March 19, 1990, (reminder: County and School District must
receive our plans to create the districts no later than February
19, 1990).
o Establish economic development, T.I.F. districts for all retail
areas. After establishment, attempt to upgrade all or part of
some of these districts to redevelopment districts. (Economic
development districts are much easier to establish within the
recommended time frame. Redevelopment districts are more
difficult to establish but are more advantageous from our
perspective).
o Attempt to establish T.I.F. districts such that increments can be
"pooled" among all these districts. In this way, increments from
one district can be used to benefit another district. (Some
possible disadvantages to such pooling need to be analyzed prior
to implementation).
We believe that the initial work required to establish the T.I.F. districts
can be accomplished by staff and the City Attorney. It should be noted,
however, T.I.F. district establishment requires the preparation of a plan
describing proposed development activities, public costs, and impacts on
other taxing jurisdictions. Due to the proposed schedule, we will attempt
to describe these plans as generally as possible using generous public
cost estimates.
DEVELOPMENT /REDEVELOPMENT PLANS
During the process of establishing the T.I:F. districts we will start work..
on preparing more detailed development and redevelopment plans-. This work.
will include contacts with tenants and property owners in the district,•
preparation of land -use alternatives and public improvement plans, and more.,
detailed finance plans. This work will require assistance of the hiring or
contracting the following:
o 'Planning consultant(s) to prepare land use and public improvement
plans .
o Project manager to interface with tenants and property owners,
planning consultants, and potential developers /redevelopers.
This individual could be apart =time contractual employee.,
PLANNING COSTS
At this time, we do not have estimates for costs of establishing the
districts. Such costs must be borne by.the City until tax increments are
generated by the districts. Such increments can then be used to repay City
costs.
N
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: December 14, 1989
TO: Kenneth Rosland
City Manager
FROM: Gordon Hughes
HRA Executive Director
. SUBJECT: COMMERCIAL AREA REDEVELOPMENT
You mentioned that on December 16, 1989, the Council will discuss, among
other things, commercial area redevelopment activities. It is my
understanding that some members of the Council believe the City should
encourage and participate in redevelopment initiatives in our retail
districts, particularly Grandview, Cahill /70th Street, 44th /France and
Wooddale/Valley View. Assuming that the City has not imposed regulations
or ordinances which have discouraged private redevelopment, then the issue,
in my view, is whether or not the City is willing to offer financial
assistance to facilitate redevelopment. In that tax increment financing is
the only significant fiscal tool available for such public financing, I
thought an overview of tax increment financing would be useful.
TYPES OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS
Three types of tax increment financing districts are permitted by state
law:
o Housing Districts
o Redevelopment Districts
o Economic Development Districts
The Grandview Area, 50th & France and Edinborough /Centennial Lakes are
presently located within redevelopment districts. Southdale /Galleries is
located in an economic development district. We have no housing districts.
Redevelopment and housing districts may remain in existence for 25 years.
Therefore, they possess the greatest potential for tax increment
collections. However, stringent statutory tests make these districts
difficult to establish. To. qualify as a redevelopment district, 20% of the
buildings in the proposed district must suffer structural defects or a
combination of difficiencies in utilities and facilities, and other defects
or deficiencies of a significance to justify substantial renovation or
clearance. An additional 30% of the buildings must require renovation or
clearance to remove conditions such as inadequate street layout,
incompatible land uses, overcrowding, or obsolescence. Although
we have not analyzed these districts in detail, it may be difficult to meet
these statuatory tests in the Cahill /70th Street, 44th Street /France
Avenue, and Wooddale/Valley View Road retail areas. It should be noted
that the statuatory tests have become more stringent since the 50th &
France district was established. Housing districts, of course, would be of
limited value for commercial area redevelopment unless a major change in
land use is desired. Even so, state law now requires that beneficiaries of
such districts meet very stringent income tests.
If we cannot meet the-tests for redevelopment districts, and if housing
districts are not appropriate for the situation, then we are limited to
creating economic development districts. Economic development districts
have two restrictions that limit the potential for significant
redevelopment activities.
1) Districts are limited to 8 -10 years in duration rather than 25
years as with redevelopment or housing districts.
2) The base value of such districts is not absolutely frozen, rather
it increases annually at the average inflation rate of the
district during the prior five years.
Both of these restrictions limit the economic potential of such districts,
especially in cases where a relatively immediate addition of new taxable
value does not occur.
TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT ESTABLISHMENT
I will not attempt to outline all of the steps in tax increment district
establishment. The Council should be aware, however, that it requires more
than simply adopting a resolution. A plan and program must be prepared for
each district which includes a proposed budget, a description of the public
costs involved, a projection of anticipated tax increments, and an
assessment of impacts on other taxing jurisdictions. Such jurisdictions
are entitled to review and comment on these assessments prior to district
establishment.
FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS
As mentioned earlier, certain restrictions limit the viability 6f economic
development districts. Even with the more liberal requirements of
redevelopment districts, if additional taxable value is not added to the
district during flat inflationary times, relatively few increments are
collected to repay public costs. For example, the 50th & France district
may not have produced tax increments needed to repay the HRA's debt were it
not for double digit inflation during the early years of the district.
Generally speaking, the financial success of a tax increment district in a
retail area is dependent upon an increase in the intensity of development
and the resulting increase in tax revenues. Of the three district
mentioned, 70th Street and Cahill probably offers the greatest tax
increment potential because of the opportunity to capture the Cahill school
property prior to redevelopment. Valley View/Wooddale and 44th & France
suffer from the problem of, on one hand, having little or no vacant sites
to capture, and on the other hand, having difficulty meeting the test for a
redevelopment district.
�J
LEGISLATIVE CHANGES
Tax increment financing continues to be an unpopular fiscal tool in the
view of many legislators. The 1989 property tax law established additional
restrictions regarding tax increment use. It is very likely that further
restrictions will be considered in the coming legislative session. With
regard to future restrictions, the Council should be aware of the following
possibilities. First, key legislators have become very critical of
economic development districts. Many of us believe that a serious effort
will be undertaken to prohibit such districts altogether. Therefore, if
redevelopment districts cannot be justified for our retail areas, then I
suggest that economic development districts be established as soon as
possible. Second,-legislation was introduced in the 1989 session which
would have impacted existing tax increment districts with outstanding debt.
Up until then, staff believed that such retroactive restrictions would not
be considered. However, key legislators now seem interested in such
restriction. Therefore, we can no longer be assured that existing
districts are safe from legislative changes that impact our ability to
repay public costs. Third, certain legislative changes indirectly affect
existing tax increment districts. For example, the 1988 tax law changes
relating to state paid homestead indirectly and apparently inadvertently
impacted the Centennial Lakes /Edinborough district.
OTHER FUNDING SOURCES - HRA LEVY
As mentioned earlier, tax increment financing is the only significant tool
available for public financing of retail redevelopment. However, the HRA
could impose an HRA levy in addition to the City's normal levy. This HRA
levy can be made outside of the City's normal levy limit imposed by the
State. According to my information, the annual HRA levy cannot exceed
.0131% of our taxable market value. This would total about $350,000
annually that could be targeted at retail redevelopment. The Council, of
course, should understand that this would constitute an increase in our
local levy against Edina taxpayers.
SUMMARY
1. Tax increment financing is virtually the only significant fiscal tool
available to assist retail redevelopment. However, the HRA could
impose a levy against all taxable property in the City which could be
targeted to retail redevelopment.
2. Redevelopment districts (i.e. 25 year districts) may be difficult to
establish at 44th & France, Wooddale & Valley View, and 70th & Cahill
due to the statutory tests that must be met. Economic development
districts (8- 10.year districts) are possible for all retail districts.
Such districts should be established as soon as possible because of
anticipated legislative restrictions.
Tax increment districts, especially economic development districts,
rely upon an increase in development intensity to produce sufficient
increments for repayment of public costs. This is especially true
during flat inflationary times.
4. The legislature continues to consider additional restrictions for tax _
increment financing. Some of these restrictions may be retroactive in
nature and, therefore, could adversely impact tax increment districts
which existed prior to passage of the restrictions.
l+
o 71
Cn
r
• drpM��� •
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: HRA COMMISSIONERS
From: GORDON L. HUGHES
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
Date: MARCH 19, 1990
Agenda Item # HRA II.
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends [E To HRA
Subject: ' ❑ To Council
PRELIMINARY REPORT -
TAX INCREMENT DISTRICTS Action El Motion
❑ Resolution
❑ Ordinance
❑ Discussion
Recommendation:
Provide comments and direction to staff concerning the proposed tax
increment financing plans. Schedule public hearing for April 2, 1990.
Info /Background:
In accordance with the Council's request, we have prepared draft plans
supporting the establishment of tax increment financing districts at Valley
View Road and Wooddale Avenue, 44th Street and France Avenue and 70th
Street and Cahill Road. These preliminary plans have been prepared with
the assistance of the Hoisington Group, our planning consultant. J.Peter
Meyers has also assisted us in discussions with the business community.
These plans are in the draft stage and we would welcome your comments and
direction concerning them.
PLAN PREPARATION AND REVIEW PROCESS
Prior to commencing plan preparation, staff and our consultant met
individually with the 5 or 6 key business persons from each of the three
retail areas. The purpose of these meetings was to obtain their comments
and recommendations concerning the area and to determine if they had
particular plans relating to their businesses. Following these meetings
our consultants prepared preliminary land use and public improvement plans.
Report and Recommendation
March 19, 1990
Page Two
On February 27, 1990, staff and the consultant conducted an open meeting
with each of the three retail areas. At these meetings we presented our
preliminary plans and obtained any comments and recommendations from those
in attendance. It should be noted that these meetings were very well
attended by the business community. On February .28, 1990, the preliminary
plans were likewise presented to the Community Development and Planning
Commission for their informal review. Following these meetings, our
consultant revised and refined the land use plans which are included in
this packet of materials. At the same time, our staff has drafted the
narrative that will accompany the plans. These drafts are likewise
attached. Our legal counsel is presently in the process of preparing the
legal documents necessary for district establishment.
The purpose of the March 19, 1990, Council review, is to obtain your
comments and recommendations concerning the preliminary plans: We will
then be able to provide revisions to these plans prior to the April 2,
1990, hearing. Although the March 19th review is not a scheduled public
hearing, we have invited those individuals who were in attendance at the
February 27, 1990, meeting, as well'as other individuals who have called to
inquire about our plans. We expect that some of these individuals would
like to offer comments to the Council. The Community Development and
Planning Commission will again review the proposed plans at their March 28,
1990, meeting, and we hope will pass a recommendation on to the Council for
your consideration on April 2, 1990.
STATUS OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING LEGISLATION
As you know, legislation adverse to tax increment financing has been
introduced in both houses of the legislature. Adoption of this legislation
would likely restrict our ability to create some or all of the three
proposed tax increment financing districts. Based on our understanding of
these bills, it would be important to establish these districts prior to
April 30, 1990, as this appears to be the proposed effective date of this
legislation.
PRELIMINARY PLANS
Although the effective date of pending tax increment legislation is April
30, 1990, it should be noted that certain portions of the proposed
legislation may affect districts that are created prior to April 30. In
particular, the legislation may affect our ability to amend existing tax
increment financing plans at a later date. Therefore, the proposed retail
plans provide for a wide range of public involvement based on the reasoning
that it may be difficult to expand the scope of these plans in the future.
For example, the plans provide for the possibility of public acquisition of
properties for redevelopment purposes, even though at a later date, the
City may elect not to participate in such acquisitions.
Report and Recommendation
March 19, 1990
Page Three
It is important to know that adoption of'the tax increment financing plans
and districts does not commit the City to implement the plans.
Establishment of the districts provides the financial basis for future City
or HRA participation. Therefore, the plan should be viewed as schematic in
nature.
FINANCE PLANS
Finance plans will be incorporated into the legal documents presented on
April 2. As with the land use plans, we have included a wide range of
potential public expenditures including the possible public acquisition of
properties to facilitate development /redevelopment. Some of these possible
acquisitions include single family homes particularly at 44th and France.
Again, our strategy has been to include all possibilities recognizing that
legislation may restrict our ability to expand plans in the future.
Our preliminary public cost budgets are provided in Exhibit A. At this
time, we have not attempted to determine if adequate tax increments will
exist to support such expenditures. In our view, such analyses are best
performed at the time specific projects are proposed.
Ste.
Staff is very anxious to receive your comments and direction concerning
these draft plans. Your requested revisions can then be accommodated into
the plans which are presented for public hearing on April 2, 1990.
DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 2
and
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLANS FOR
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS
90 -1 (44th and France),
90 -2 (Valley View and Wooddale)
and
90 -3 (70th and Cahill),
April 2, 1990
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Table of Contents is for convenience of reference
only and is not part of the Development Program or the Tax
Increment Financing Plan.
Paae
I. INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
A. Statement of Need and'Statutory Authority 1
B. Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
II. DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICTNO. 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
A. Property To Be Included in
Development District . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
B. Development Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
C. Operation of Development District . . . . . . . . 4
D. Estimated Capital and Administrative Costs.. . 4
E. Property Acquisition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
III. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT
NO. 90 -1 (44TH AND FRANCE) . . . . . . . . . . . 6
A. Statement of Objectives and Development Program 6
B. Property To Be Included in Tax Increment
District . . . . . . . 6
C. Estimated Capital and Administration Costs . . 6
D. Payment of Capital and Administrative Costs . . . 6
E. Determination and'Use of Tax Increment . . . . . . 7
F. Impact of Tax Increment Financing on
Other Taxing Jurisdictions . . . . . . . . . . 9
IV. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT
NO. 90 -2 (VALLEY VIEW AND WOODDALE) . . . . . . . . . 10
A. Statement of Objectives and Development Program 10
B. Property To Be Included in Tax Increment
District . . . . 10
C. Estimated Capital and Administration Costs 11
D. Payment of Capital and Administrative Costs 11
E. Determination and Use of Tax Increment . . . . . . 12
F. Impact of Tax Increment Financing on
Other Taxing Jurisdictions . . . . . . . . . . 13
V. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT
NO. 90 -3 (70TH AND CAHILL) . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
A. Statement of Objectives and Development Program 14
B. Property To Be Included in Tax Increment
District . . . . . . . 14
C. Estimated Capital and Administration Costs . . . . 14
D. Payment of Capital and Administrative Costs . . . 15
E. Determination and Use of Tax Increment . . . . . . 15
F. Impact of Tax Increment Financing on
Other Taxing Jurisdictions . . . . . . . . . . 17
VI.
IMPLEMENTATION
OF THE PROGRAM AND PLANS . . . .
. . . 18
VII.
AMENDMENTS,TO
PROGRAM AND PLANS . . . . . . . .
. . . 18
EXHIBITS
A. Map of Development District No. 2
B. Development Plan
C. List of Parcels in Tax Increment Financing
District 90 -1
D. Staff Report Evidencing Tax Increment Financing
District No. 90 -1 Meets Redevelopment District
Criteria
E. Estimated Tax Increment for Tax Increment
Financing District 90 -1
F. List of Parcels in Tax Increment Financing
District 90 -2
G. Estimated Tax Increment for Tax Increment
Financing District No. 90 -2
H. List of Parcels in Tax Increment Financing
District 90 -3
I. Estimated Tax Increment for Tax Increment
Financing District 90 -3
I. INTRODUCTION
A. Statement of Need and Statutory Authority. The
commercial areas in City of Edina located in the vicinity of
West 44th Street and France Avenue, Valley View Road and
Wooddale Avenue and West 70th Street and Cahill Road currently
have certain deficiencies relating to traffic circulation,
parking, land use and physical development which detracts from
these areas. The City Council has determined that the City may
be able to assist in the alleviation of such deficiencies and
that in order to provide such assistance it is necessary to
include these three areas in a Development District to be
designated as Development District No. 2 and to take certain
action pursuant to a Development Program (the "Program ").
.In order to finance the capital and administration
costs of the Program, it is proposed that the City adopt tax
increment financing plans (the "Plans "), which provide for the
creation of Tax Increment Financing Districts 90 -1 (44th and
France), 90 -2 (Valley View and Wooddale) and 90 -3 (70th and
Cahill) (the "Districts ").
The Program and the Plans are adopted by the City
Council of the City pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections
469.001 to 469.047 and 469.174 to 469.179.
B. Definitions. Each of the words and terms defined
in this Section shall for all purposes of the Program and the
Plan, have the meanings given to them in this Section B:.
"Bonds" means the tax increment bonds and any other
obligations issued by the City, the principal of and interest
on which are payable in whole or in part out of the Tax
Increment, to finance or provide for the payment of the Capital
and Administrative Cost. '
"Bond Resolution" means any and all resolutions,
ordinances, trust indentures or other documents under which any
Bonds are sold, issued or secured.
"Capital and Administrative Costs" means the total
amount expended and to be expended by the City on Development
Activities as provided in the Program and Plans.
"Captured Tax Capacity" means for such Tax Increment
District that portion of the Tax Capacity for such Tax
Increment District in excess of the Original Tax Capacity for
such Tax Increment District as adjusted from time to time, if
any.
"City" means the City of Edina, Hennepin County,
Minnesota.
"Development Activities" means all actions taken or to
be taken by the City or HRA in establishing, implementing and
carrying out the,Program.
"Development District" means Development District
No. 2 of the City as established pursuant to this Program.
"HRA" means the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of
Edina, Minnesota.
"Original Tax Capacity „ means the Net Tax Capacity of
all taxable property in the Tax Increment District as most
recently determined by the Commissioner of Revenue of the State
of Minnesota as of the date of certification thereof by the
County Auditor pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177
and as thereafter adjusted and certified by the County Auditor
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177.
"Outstanding” when used with respect to the Bonds,
means Bonds which have not been paid, redeemed or discharged in
accordance with their terms or the terms of a Bond Resolution.
"Parcel" means a lot, parcel or tract of plat of land
comprising a single unit for - purposes of assessment for real
estate tax purposes, as of the date of adoption of this Plan.
".Plans" means the Tag Increment Financing Plans for
each of the Districts as approved and as supplemented and
amended from time to time by the City Council of the City.
"Program" means this Development Program as
supplemented and amended from time to time by the City Council
of the City.
"Tax Capacity" means the net tag capacity of all
taxable property in a District as determined from time to time
pursuant to state law.
"Tag Capacity Rate" means with respect to taxes
payable in any year the lesser of (i) the local taxing district
tax capacity rates for taxes payable in such year or (ii) the
"original tax capacity rate" for a Tax Increment District as
defined and calculated in accordance with Minnesota Statutes,
Section 469.177, Subdivision la.
"Tax Increment" means that portion of the ad valorem
taxes generated by the extension of the Tag Capacity Rate to
-2-
the Captured Tax Capaci
Increment District.
"Tax Increment
Financing District 90 -1
"Tax Increment
Financing District 90 -2
"Tax Increment
Financing District 90 -3
ty of taxable property in
District 90 -1" means Tax
(44th and France) of the
District 90 -2" means Tax
(Valley View and Wooddal,
District 90 -3" means Tax
(70th and Cahill) of the
a Tax
Increment
City.
Increment
B) of the City.
Increment
City.
"Tax Increment Districts" means collectively Tax
Increment Financing District 90 -1, 90 -2, and 90 -3.
-3-
II. DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 2
A. Property To Be Included in Development District.
The Parcels located in the City of Edina, Hennepin County,
Minnesota, set forth in Exhibit A hereto, shall constitute the
Development. District.
B. Development Plan. The Development Plan for the
Development District appears as Exhibit B hereto. To the
extent that any proposed uses in the. Development Plan conflict
with the City's Comprehensive Plan, such uses will not be
permitted unless and until the Comprehensive Plan is amended to
permit such use.
C. Operation of Development District. Unless
otherwise directed by the City, the maintenance and operation
of the public improvements constructed in the District will be
the responsibility of the HRA, as administrator of the
District. Each year the HRA will submit to the City Council
the maintenance and operation budget for the Development
District for the following year.
The HRA will administer the Development District
pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section
469.131; provided, however, that the HRA may exercise the
powers listed in said Section 469.131 only at the direction of
the City Council.
D. Estimated Capital and Administrative Costs. The
estimated Capital and Administrative Costs of the Program are
as follows:
avital Cost-
44th and Valley View 70th and
-4-
France
and Wooddale
Cahill
Property Acquisition
$1,330,000
$153,800
$529,400
Demolition
200,000
40,000
150,000
Interest Assistance
175,000
100,000
150,000
Relocation
280,000
46,000
160,000
Public Improvements
(Parking, Utilities,
Landscaping, Street
Vacation)
530,000
190,000
175,000
Historic Building
Relocation
-
-
150,000
Total
$2,515,000
$529,000
$1,314,400
-4-
Financinq_ and Administrative Costs and Continaen
Legal, Fiscal and Administrative $ 500,000
Capitalized Interest 750,000
Bond Discount 105,000
Contingency 654,000
Total $2,009,000
The elements and costs shown above are estimated to be
necessary based upon information now available. It is
anticipated that the Capital and Administrative Costs may
decrease or increase. The City reserves the right to pay any
of the Capital and Administrative Costs from the proceeds of
Tax Increment Bonds or directly from Tax Increment.
.E. Property AcQuisition. In carrying out the Program
the City may acquire certain property in the Development
District. The Development Plan for the Development District
envisions that it may be necessary for the City to acquire any
right of way necessary for public improvements and to acquire
the following property in the Development District to assist in
the development of the property in the Development District in
accordance with the Program:
44th and France Area
Edina Cleaners
Rapid Oil
Storage Garage
4532 France Avenue South
4536 France Avenue South
3916 W. 44th Street
3918 W. 44th Street
3920 W. 44th Street
3924 W. 44th Street
3930 W. 44th Street
3936 W. 44th Street
Valley View and Wooddale
Roster's
6120 Kellogg
70th and Cahill
Union Oil
Coit Warehouse
-5-
III. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING
DISTRICT NO. 90 -1 (44TH AND FRANCE)
A. Statement of Obiectives and Development Program.
See Section B of the Program.
B. Property To Be Included in Tax Increment District.
The Parcels located in the City of Edina, Hennepin
County, Minnesota set forth on Exhibit C•shall constitute the
T =4 TncrPment District No. 90 -1.
C. Estimated Capital and Administration Costs.
1. Capital Proceeds. The capital proceeds of the
project, comprising.the proceeds--of sale of any land acquired
by the City to private developers, are expected to be $0.00.
2. Capital and Administration Costs. The Capital and
Administration Costs of the Development District, comprising
the total costs expected to be incurred in carrying out the
Development Activities by the City is expected to be as shown
in Section D of the Program, plus interest to be paid on the
Tax Increment Bonds during their term (other than interest paid
from the proceeds of the Tax Increment Bonds).
3. Property to be Acquired. See Section E of the
Program.
D. Payment of Capital and Administrative Costs.
1. In General. All Capital and Administrative Costs
will be paid from Tax Increment either directly or indirectly
by payment of debt service on Tax Increment Bonds issued to
finance such cost or reimbursement for items of Capital and
Administrative Costs paid directly by the City.
2. Issuance of Bonds. It is presently expected that
all or a portion of the Capital and Administrative Costs will
be financed by the issuance of the Tax Increment Bonds. The
Tax Increment Bonds will be issued by the City under authority
of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475, and Sections 469.174 to
469.179. The principal amount of the Bonds is expected to be
$6,370,000.
The actual principal amount of the Bonds, however, may be less
than or exceed this amount, and the right to issue the Bonds in
an amount greater than $6,370,000 to finance such Capital and
Administrative Costs is reserved. Similarly, the amount
allocated to capitalized interest covers interest payable on
the Bonds (net of investment income on proceeds of the Bonds)
at an initial rate now estimated to be approximately 8% per
annum for a 18 -month period; and the City reserves the right to
increase or decrease the amount of capitalized interest to
correspond to the interest actually payable on the Bonds over
the 18 -month period.
3. Security For Bonds. The Bonds will be general
obligations of the City, and the City will pledge its full
faith, credit and unlimited taxing powers to the payment of
principal thereof and interest thereon. The principal of and
interest on the Bonds are payable primarily, however, from the
Tax Increments from one or more of the Tax Increment Districts
and no ad valorem tax is expected to be levied for payment of
the Bonds and interest thereon in the Bond Resolution. All Tax
Increments will be pledged and appropriated to the payment of
the Bonds and the interest thereon when due. In addition,'such
principal and interest will be paid from certain proceeds of
the Bonds (capitalized interest) and interest earnings thereon.
4. Bond Terms. The terms of the Tax Increment Bonds
are expected to be as set forth below; however, the .right is
reserved to adjust any and all terms of the Tax Increment Bonds
to secure the best interest rate obtainable and to insure that
the entire principal of and interest on the Tax Increment Bonds
will be paid when due from the sources specified in paragraph 3.
The Tax Increment Bonds will be issued in one or more
series, in the aggregate principal amount of $6,370,000, will
mature serially over a period of approximately twenty (20)
years from the date of receipt by the City of the first Tax
Increment from the Tax Increment Districts, will be subject to
redemption prior to maturity, will bear a fixed rate or rates
of interest from date of issue to maturity, payable
semiannually commencing approximately six months after the
issuance thereof, and will be sold at public or private sale.
E. Determination and Use of Tax Increment.
1. Statutory Authority and Tax Increment District
90-1 Eligibility as an Redevelopment District. Minnesota
Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10 defines a
"redevelopment district" as a tax increment financing district
consisting of a portion of a development district which is 70%
of the Parcels in which are occupied by buildings, streets,
utilities or other improvements and 20% of the buildings are
structurally substandard and the additional 30% of the
buildings require substantial renovation or clearance to remove
such existing conditions as: inadequate street layout,
-7-
incompatible uses or land use relationships, overcrowding of
buildings on the land, excessive dwelling unit density,
obsolete buildings not suitable for improvement or conversion,.
or other identified hazards to the health, safety, and general
well -being of the community.
Based upon a report of City staff attached hereto as
Exhibit D, the City believes Tax Increment District 90 -1 is a
"redevelopment district" since the conditions set forth in the
preceding paragraph are satisfied with respect to Tax Increment
District 90 -1.
2. Original Tax Capacity. The Tax Capacity of all
taxable property in Tax Increment District 90 -1 as most
recently certified by the Commissioner of Revenue of the State
of Minnesota, being the certification made in 1989 with respect
to the Tax Capacity of such property as of January 2, 1989, is
$116,578.
3. Current Tax Capacity. The current Tax Capacity of
property in Tax Increment District 90 -1 is $116,578, the
Original Tax Capacity.
4. Captured Tax Capacity. It is expected that the
Captured Tax Capacity of all taxable property in Tax Increment
District 90 -1, upon completion of the improvements in Tax
Increment District 90 -1 described in the Program (taxes payable
2015) in Tax Increment District 90 -1, will be $177,920,
computed as follows:
Estimated Tax Capacity . . . . . . $294,498
at Completion
Less Original Tax-Capacity . . . . 116,578
at Completion
Estimated Captured Tax
Capacity at Completion . . . . . $177,920
5. Tax Increment Calculation. Assuming the
Anticipated Private Developments occur as described and
provided in the Program it is estimated that the Tax Increment
to be received each year for the duration of Tax Increment
District 90 -1 will be as set forth in Exhibit E hereto. The
estimated amount of Tax Increment set forth in Exhibit E is
based upon a Tax Capacity Rate of .90098.
6. Duration of Tax Increment District 90 -1. It is
estimated that Tax Increment District 90 -1 will remain in
existence until 25 years from the date of receipt by the City
-8-
of the first Tax Increment from Tax Increment District 90 -1, or
until the City's obligation to pay the Tax Increment Bonds and
interest has been discharged in accordance with the Bond
Resolution.
7. Use of Captured Tax Capacity and Tax Increment.
Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, Subdivision 2,
the City hereby determines that it will use 100% of the
Captured Tax Capacity of property located in Tax Increment
District 90 -1, and 100% of the Tax Increments to be derived
therefrom, for the entire duration of Tax Increment District
90 -1.
8. Excess Tax Increment. The Tax Increment received
from Tax Increment District 90 -1 in any year not needed to pay
debt service on the Tax Increment Bonds coming due on or before
August 1 of the following year, shall be used first to reduce
any ad valorem property tax levied pursuant to and in accordance
with Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.61, Subdivision 3,.and
then shall be used to prepay or discharge outstanding Tax
Increment Bonds or pay additional Capital and Administration
Costs, all in accordance with the Bond Resolution.
9. Pooling of Tax Increment. Tax Increment received
from Tax Increment District 90 -1 will be pooled by the City
with all other Tax Increment received from the Tax Increment
Districts and will be available for expenditure for any Capital
and Administrative Costs, whether or not such Capital and
Administrative Costs are incurred with respect to property
included in Tax Increment District 90 -1.
F. Impact of Tax Increment Financing on Other Taxing
Jurisdictions.
The local government units other than the City which
are authorized by law to levy ad valorem property taxes and in
which Tax Increment District 90 -1 is located, are Independent
School District No. 273, Hennepin County, the HRA, and various
metropolitan area authorities, including the Metropolitan
Council, the Metropolitan Transit Commission, the Metropolitan
Airports Commission and the Metropolitan Mosquito Control
District (the local government units).
The taxing jurisdictions encompassing Tax Increment
District 90 -1 will continue to receive taxes as if the Original
Tax Capacity of Tax Increment District 90 -1 were unchanged,
except for the increase in Original Tax Capacity described in
Part F(2) of this Plan. This precludes the jurisdictions from
benefiting from a portion of the increase in Tax Capacity which
results from the improvements in Tax Increment District 90 -1
-9-
described in the Program or other development of the taxable
property in Tax Increment District 90 -1. In order to assess
the impact of this on Hennepin County, Independent School
District No. 273 and the City the following table indicates
what percentage the anticipated Captured Tax Capacity of Tax
Increment District-90 -1 at the completion of the improvements
in Tax Increment District 90 -1 described in the Program (which
occurs for taxes payable in 2015 as shown on Exhibit E hereto),
is of the present total Tax Capacity for such taxing
jurisdiction.
If Tax Increment District 90 -1 were not created and the
improvements occur in Tax Increment District 90 -1 as described
in the Program, all of the Captured Tax Capacity of Tax
Increment District 90 -1 would be available to the taxing
jurisdictions, which would result in an increase in the tax
capacity of such taxing jurisdictions in each year during the
duration of Tax Increment District 90 -1 in an amount equal to
the Captured Tax Capacity,
IV. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING
DISTRICT NO. 90 -2 (VALLEY VIEW AND WOODDALE)
A. Statement of Objectives and Development Program.
See Section B of the Development Program.
B. Property To Be Included in Tax Increment District.
The Parcels located in the City of Edina, Hennepin
County, Minnesota set forth on Exhibit F shall constitute Tax
Increment District 90 -2.
-10-
Estimated
Captured
Tax
Capacity
Percent of
Present
at Completion
Present
Taxing
Tax
of
Total Tax
Jurisdiction
Capacity
Improvements
Capacity
Hennepin
County
$1,034,463,652
$177,920
.02%
I.S.D.
No. 273
63,744,885
177,920
.2
City of Edina
77,629,266
177,920
.233$ %
If Tax Increment District 90 -1 were not created and the
improvements occur in Tax Increment District 90 -1 as described
in the Program, all of the Captured Tax Capacity of Tax
Increment District 90 -1 would be available to the taxing
jurisdictions, which would result in an increase in the tax
capacity of such taxing jurisdictions in each year during the
duration of Tax Increment District 90 -1 in an amount equal to
the Captured Tax Capacity,
IV. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING
DISTRICT NO. 90 -2 (VALLEY VIEW AND WOODDALE)
A. Statement of Objectives and Development Program.
See Section B of the Development Program.
B. Property To Be Included in Tax Increment District.
The Parcels located in the City of Edina, Hennepin
County, Minnesota set forth on Exhibit F shall constitute Tax
Increment District 90 -2.
-10-
C. Estimated Capital and Administration Costs.
1. Capital Proceeds. The capital proceeds of the
project, comprising the proceeds of sale of any land acquired
by the City to private developers, are expected to be $0.00.
2. Capital and Administration Costs. The Capital and
Administration Costs of the Development District, comprising
the total costs expected to be incurred in carrying out the
Development Activities by the City is expected to be as shown
in Section D of the Program, plus interest to be paid on the
Tax Increment Bonds during their term (other than interest paid
from the proceeds of the Tax Increment Bonds).
.3. Property to be Acquired. See Section E of the
Program.
D. Payment of Capital and Administrative Costs. See
Section D of the Plan for Tax Increment District 90 -1.
E. Determination and Use of Tax Increment.
1. Statutory Authority and District Eligibility as an
Economic Development District. Minnesota Statutes, Section
469.174, Subdivision 12 defines an "economic development
district" as a tax increment financing district consisting of a
portion of a development district which the authority finds to
be in the public interest because it will discourage commerce,
industry or manufacturing from moving their operations to
another state, will result in increased employment in the
municipality or will result in preservation and enhancement of
the tax base of the municipality.
The City believes, -Tax Increment District 90 -2 is an
"economic development district" since the Development
Activities to occur in Tax Increment District 90 -2 will result
in preservation and enhancement of the tax base of the City.
2. Original Tax Capacity. The Tax Capacity of all
taxable property in Tax Increment District 90 -2 as most
recently certified by the Commissioner of Revenue of the State
of Minnesota, being the certification made in 1989 with respect
to the Tax Capacity of such property as of January 2, 1989, is
$74,536, which amount is expected to be the Original Tax
Capacity of Tax Increment District 90 -2, subject to adjustment
of 4.24% per year pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section
469.177, Subdivision 1, based on the average percentage
increase in the assessed valuation of property in Tax Increment
District 90 -2 during the last five years.
-11-
3. Current Tax Capacity. The current Tax Capacity of
property in Tax Increment District 90 -2 is $74,536, the
Original Tax Capacity.
4. Captured Tax Capacity. It is expected that the
Captured Tax Capacity of all taxable property in Tax Increment
District 90 -2, upon completion of the improvements in Tax
Increment District 90 -2 described in the Program (taxes payable
2000) in Tax Increment District 90 -2, will be $10,468, computed
as follows:
Estimated Tax Capacity . . . $123,373
at Completion
Less Original Tax Capacity . . . 112,904
at Completion
Estimated Captured Tax
Capacity at Completion . . . . . $ 10,468
5. Tax Increment Calculation. Assuming the
improvements in Tax Increment District 90 -2 occur as described
and provided in the Program hereto it is estimated that the Tax
Increment to be received each year for the duration of Tax
Increment District 90 -2 will be as set forth in Exhibit G
hereto. The estimated amount of Tax Increment set forth in
Exhibit G is based upon a Tax Capacity Rate of .90098.
6. Duration of the Tax Increment District 90 -2. It
is estimated that Tax Increment District 90 -2 will remain in
existence until the 8 years from the date of receipt of the
first Tax Increment from Tax Increment District 90 -2 or 10
years from the date of approval of this Plan, whichever is
earlier, or until the City's obligation to pay the.Tax
Increment Bonds and interest has been discharged in accordance
with the Bond Resolution.
7. Use of Captured Tax Capacity and Tax Increment.
Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, Subdivision 2,
the City hereby determines that it will use 100% of the
Captured Tax Capacity of property located in Tax Increment
District 90 -2, and 100% of the Tax Increments to be derived
therefrom, for the entire duration of Tax Increment District
90 -2.
8. Excess Tax Increment. The Tax Increment received
from Tax Increment District 90 -2 in any year not needed to pay
debt service on the Tax Increment Bonds coming due on or before
August 1 of the following year, shall be used first to reduce
any ad valorem property tax levied pursuant to and in accordance
-12-
with Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.61, Subdivision 3, and
then shall be used to prepay or discharge outstanding Tax
Increment Bonds or pay additional Capital and Administration
Costs, all in accordance with the Bond Resolution.
9. Pooling of Tax Increment. Tax Increment received
from Tax Increment District 90 -2 will be pooled by the City
with all other Tax Increment received from the Tax Increment
Districts and will be available for expenditure for any Capital
and Administrative Costs, whether or not such Capital and
Administrative Costs are incurred with respect to property
included in Tax Increment District 90 =2.
F. Impact of Tax Increment Financing on Other Taxing
Jurisdictions.
The local government units other than the City which
are authorized by law to levy ad valorem property taxes and in
which Tax Increment District 90 -2 is located, are Independent
School District No. 273, Hennepin County, the HRA, and various
metropolitan area authorities, including the Metropolitan
Council, the Metropolitan Transit Commission, the Metropolitan
Airports Commission and the Metropolitan Mosquito Control
District (the local government units).
The taxing jurisdictions encompassing Tax Increment
District 90 -2 will continue to receive taxes as if the Original
Tax Capacity of Tax Increment District 90 -2 were unchanged,
except for the increase in Original Tax Capacity described in
Part F(2) of this Plan. This precludes the jurisdictions from
benefiting from a portion of the increase in Tax Capacity which
results from the improvements in Tax Increment District 90 -2
described in the Program or other development of the taxable
property in Tax Increment'District 90 -2. In order to assess
the impact of this on Hennepin County, Independent School
District No. 273 and the City the following table indicates
what percentage the anticipated Captured Tax Capacity of Tax
Increment District 90 -2 at the completion of the improvements
in Tax Increment District 90 -2 described in the Program (which
occurs for taxes payable in 2000 as shown on Exhibit G hereto),
is of the present total Tax Capacity for such taxing
jurisdiction.
-13-
Taxing
Jurisdiction
Hennepin
County
I.S.D.
No.- -273
City of Edina
Present
Tax
Capacity
$1,034,463,652
63,744,885
77,629,266
Estimated
Captured
Tax
Capacity
at Completion
of
Improvements
$10,4,68
10,468
10,468
Percent of
Present
Total Tax
Capacity
less than .01%
.02%
.01%
If Tax Increment District 90 -2 were not created and the
improvements occur in Tax Increment District 90 -2 as described
in the Program, all of the Captured Tax Capacity of Tax
Increment District 90 -2 would be available to the taxing
jurisdictions, which would result in an increase in the tax
capacity of such taxing jurisdictions in each year during the
duration of Tax Increment District 90 -2 in an amount equal to
the Captured Tax Capacity.
V. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING
DISTRICT NO. 90 -3 (70TH AND CAHILL)
A. Statement of Obiectives and Development Program.
See Section A of the Development Program.
B. Property To Be•Included in Tax Increment District
90 -3.
The Parcels located in the City of Edina, Hennepin
County, Minnesota set forth on Exhibit H shall constitute Tax
Increment District 90 -3.
C. Estimated Capital and Administration Costs.
1. Capital Proceeds. The capital proceeds of the
project, comprising the proceeds of sale of any land acquired
by the City to private developers, are expected to be $0.00.
2. Capital and Administration Costs. The Capital and
Administration Costs of the Development District, comprising
the total costs expected to be incurred in carrying out the
Development Activities by the City is expected to be as shown
in Section D of the Program, plus interest to be paid on the
Tax Increment Bonds during their term (other than interest paid
from the proceeds of the Tax Increment Bonds).
-14-
3. Property to be Acquired. See Section E of the
Program.
D. Payment of Capital and Administrative Costs. See
Section D of the plan for Tax Increment District 90 -1.
E. Determination and Use of Tax Increment.
1. Statutory Authority and District Eligibility as an
Economic Development District. Minnesota Statutes, Section
469.174, Subdivision 12 defines an "economic development
district" as a tax increment financing district consisting of a
portion of a development district which the authority.finds to
be in the public interest because it will discourage commerce,
industry or manufacturing from moving their operations to
another state, will result in increased employment in the
municipality or will result in preservation and enhancement.of
the tax base of the municipality.
The City believes Tax Increment District 90 -3 is an
"economic development district" since the Development
Activities to occur in Tax Increment District 90 -3 will result
in the preservation and enhancement of the tax base of the City.
2. Original Tax Capacity. The Tax Capacity of all
taxable property in Tax Increment District 90 -3 as most
recently certified by the Commissioner of Revenue of the State
of Minnesota, being the certification made in 1989 with respect
to the Tax Capacity of such property as of January 2, 1989, is
$270,426, which amount is expected to be the Original Tax
Capacity of Tax Increment District 90 -3, subject to adjustment
of 5.10% per year pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section
469.177, Subdivision 1, based on the average percentage
increase in the assessed va- luation of property in Tax Increment
District 90 -3 during the last five years.
3. Current Tax Capacity. The current Tax Capacity of
property in Tax Increment District 90 -3 is $270,426, the
Original Tax Capacity.
4. Captured Tax Capacity. It is expected that the
Captured Tax Capacity of all taxable property in Tax Increment
District 90 -3, upon completion of the improvements in Tax
Increment District 90 -3 (taxes payable 2000) in Tax Increment
District 90 -3, will be $306,941, computed as follows:
-15-
Estimated Tax Capacity . . . . . . $751,650
at Completion
Less Original Tax Capacity . . . . 444,709
at Completion
Estimated Captured Tax
Capacity at Completion' $306,941
5. Tax Increment Calculation. Assuming the
improvements in Tax Increment District 90, -3 occur as described
and provided in the Program hereto it is estimated that the Tax
Increment to be received each year for the duration of Tax
Increment District 90 -3 will be as set forth in Exhibit I
hereto. The estimated amount of Tag Increment set forth in
Exhibit I is based upon a Tax Capacity Rate of .90290.
6. Duration of the Tax Increment District 90 -3. It
is estimated that Tax Increment District 90 -3 will remain in
existence until the 8 years from the date of receipt of the
first Tax Increment from Tax Increment District 90 -3 or 10
years from the date of approval of this Plan, whichever is
earlier, or until the City's obligation to pay the Tax
Increment Bonds and interest has been discharged in accordance
with the Bond Resolution.
7. Use of Captured Tax Capacity and Tax Increment.
Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, Subdivision 2,
the City hereby determines that it will use 100% of the
Captured Tax Capacity of property located in Tax Increment
District 90 -3, and 100% of the Tax Increments to be derived
therefrom, for the entire duration of Tax Increment District
90 -3.
8. Excess Tax Increment. The Tax Increment received
from Tax Increment District 90 -3 in any year not needed to pay
debt service on the Tax Increment Bonds coming due on or before
August 1 of the following year, shall be used first to reduce
any ad valorem property tax levied pursuant to and in accordance
with Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.61, Subdivision 3, and
then shall be used to prepay or discharge outstanding Tax
Increment Bonds or pay additional Capital and Administration
Costs, all in accordance with the Bond Resolution.
9. Pooling of Tax Increment. Tax Increment received
from Tax Increment District 90 -3 will be pooled by the City
with all other Tax Increment received from the Tax Increment
Districts and will be available for expenditure for any Capital
and Administrative Costs, whether or not such Capital and
Administrative Costs are incurred with respect to property
included in Tax Increment District 90 -3.
-16-
F. Impact of Tax Increment Financing on Other Taxing
Jurisdictions.
The local government units other than the City which
are authorized by law to levy ad valorem property taxes and in
which Tax Increment District 90 -3 is located, are Independent
School District No. 273, Hennepin County, the HRA, and various
metropolitan area authorities, including the Metropolitan
Council, the Metropolitan Transit Commission, the Metropolitan.
Airports Commission and the Metropolitan Mosquito Control
District (the local government units).
The taxing jurisdictions encompassing Tax Increment
District 90 -3 will continue to receive taxes as if the Original
Tax Capacity of Tax Increment District 90 -3 were unchanged,
except for the increase in Original Tax Capacity described in
Part F(2) of this Plan. This precludes the jurisdictions from
benefiting from a portion of the increase in Tax Capacity which
results from the improvements in Tax Increment District 90 -3
described in the Program or other development of the taxable
property in Tax Increment District 90 -3. In order to assess
the impact of this on Hennepin County, Independent School
District No. 273 and the City the following table indicates
what percentage the anticipated Captured Tax Capacity of Tax
Increment District 90 -3 at the completion of the improvements
in Tax Increment District 90- 3.described in the Program (which
occurs for taxes payable in 2000 as shown on Exhibit I hereto),
is of the present total Tax Capacity for such taxing
jurisdiction.
If Tax Increment District 90 -3 were not created and the
improvements occur in Tax Increment District 90 -3 as described
in the Program, all of the Captured Tax Capacity of Tax
Increment District 90 -3 would be available to the taxing
jurisdictions, which would result in an increase in the tax
-17-
Estimated
Captured
Tax
Capacity
Percent of
Present
at Completion
Present
Taxing
Tax
of
Total Tax
Jurisdiction
Capacity
Improvements
Capacity
Hennepin
County
$1,034,463,652
$306,941
.03%
I.S.D.
No. 273
63,744,885
306,941
.48%
City of Edina
77,629,266
306,941
.40%
If Tax Increment District 90 -3 were not created and the
improvements occur in Tax Increment District 90 -3 as described
in the Program, all of the Captured Tax Capacity of Tax
Increment District 90 -3 would be available to the taxing
jurisdictions, which would result in an increase in the tax
-17-
capacity of such taxing jurisdictions in each year during the
duration of Tax Increment District 90 -3 in an amount equal to
the Captured Tax Capacity.
VI. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROGRAM AMENDMENT AND PLANS
The Program and the Plans shall be implemented on
behalf of the City by the City Council and the HRA as
administrator of the Program. The City shall sell and issue
Tax Increment Bonds in the amounts needed�to finance the
Capital and Administrative Costs, less any portion thereof to
be paid directly from Tax Increment and shall use so much of
the proceeds of the Tax Increment Bonds available and Tax
Increment derived from the Districts to pay such Capital and
Administrative Costs as is necessary.
VII. AMENDMENTS TO PROGRAM AND PLANS
The City reserves the right to amend the Program and
the Plans, subject to the provisions of state law regulating
such action.
The City specifically reserves the right to enlarge
the geographic area included in any District, to increase the
Capital and Administrative Costs and the principal amount of
Tax Increment Bonds to be issued to finance such Capital and
Administrative Costs, by following the procedures specified in
Section 469.175, Subdivision 4, if and when it is determined to
be necessary for the payment of additional Capital and
Administrative Costs.
This Program and T -ax Increment Financing Plans were
adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota on
the 2nd day of April, 1990. .
Mayor
City Manager
-18-
EXHIBIT B
44TH AND FRANCE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
I. INVENTORY
The 44th and France area is a neighborhood scale Commercial District. The area
developed as "Downtown Morningside" in the 1930's at the intersection of the
France Avenue and 44th Street street car lines. Although some infill
development and redevelopment have occurred, the area has maintained its
original flavor.
The 44th and France Redevelopment Plan area is illustrated on Figure 1. The
area is generally bounded by 44th Street on the north, France Avenue on the
east, 46th Street on the south and, Eton Avenue extended on the west.
Functionally, the commercial district includes similar areas adjacent to France
Avenue in Minneapolis. This plan,-however, does not include any property within
the City of Minneapolis.
A. LAND USE, ZONING
The Redevelopment Plan Area contains a variety of residential and
non - residential land uses. There are no vacant parcels within the Plan area.
Figure 2 lists all parcels within the Plan Area and describes the present land
use for each parcel.
1
i
Morningside Rd. _ of
WI
❑ `o,� d0
�❑
a
CITY OF EDINA
PROJECT AREA PLANS
44TH AND FRANCE AVE.
Hoisingron Group Inc
0 100 200 Soo•
Project Area and Tax Increment
Financing District Boundaries
I 46th
Figure 1
PLAN AREA
Mill
Tr= Mornin side Rd.
Eli
r*
El l o
�� —° '0 1
P
y
CITY OF EDINA
PROJECT AREA PLANS
44TH AND FRANCE AVE.
Hoisington Group Inc.
0 100 200 300
Existing Occupancy
1. Durr Ltd.(Furniture)
2. House (Vac)
3. House
4. House
5. House
6. House
7. Dental Office,Elves Mkting.
8. Warehouse
9. Senior Daycare
10. Linhoff Photo
11. Sports Collection/North Star Services
12. Laser Ware
Health Foods
Hmong Folk Art
Bruegger's Bagel Bakery
13. Hardware
14. Convention Grill
15. Realty Office
16. Doctor's Office
17. Dental Of lice
18. Sheridan's Interiors
19. House
20. House
21. Edina Cleaners (2 Buildings)
22. Rapid Oil
23. Garage
24. Office
25. Office
26. House
27. House
28. House
I
_ P = Parking Areas
Utilities
Storm Sewer
46th — �'— Sanitary Sewer
Water
i• - " — " "- Overhead Power Lines
iown", Project Area
5FX-X--A Average Daily Trafflc1987 (ADT)
Figure 2
EXISTING CONDITIONS
The Redevelopment Plan Area is anchored by the retail uses on. France Avenue.
Non - residential building's along West 44th Street and Sunnyside Road are
primarily office uses.
B. NATURAL FEATURES
The character of the Plan Area is that of an urban, neighborhood scale retail
district. All of the parcels have been developed, and as such, there are no
unaltered areas remaining. However, portions of certain developed parcels
contain steep slopes and low areas which provide ponding areas and open space.
C UTILITIES
Some properties within the Plan Area receive water from Minneapolis. Electric
utilities are above ground throughout the Plan Area.
D. PARKING - CIRCULATION - TRAFFIC
France Avenue, a County Road, is designated as a minor arterial roadway and
carries approximately 13,000 vehicles trips per day. West 44th Street is a
collector Street and carries about 5,000 vehicle trips per day. Sunnyside Road
is a local street. France Avenue was reconstructed in 1989.
Parking for office and retail uses is provided in private parking lots and
public on- street parking. There are no parking structures or off - street
publicly owned parking lots in the Plan Area. The amount of off street parking
in the area does not comply with current zoning requirements for off - street
2
parking. Although there does not appear to be a shortage of parking, convenient
parking is lacking for many businesses in the central part of the Plan Area.
E. EXISTING PLANS
The City of Edina's Comprehensive Plan, originally adopted in 1981, contains the
following policies relating to northeast Edina and 44th and France in
particular:
* Maintain and encourage neighborhood retail commercial nodes at
Valley View - Wooddale and 44th and France.
* Encourage the intensification of existing commercial uses at 44th and
France provided that suitable parking provisions can be accommodated.
* Discourage extensions of Commercial uses along France Avenue, Sunnyside
Road and 44th Street.
* Encourage the redevelopment of obsolete or vacant commercial properties
and service stations on the periphery of 44th and France for multiple
residential housing.
II. PROBLEM ASSESSMENT
3
A. BUILDING CONDITION.
Most buildings in the Redevelopment Plan Area were constructed in the 1930's and
1940's. Although most buildings remain structurally sound, a significant
percentage suffer from structural and life- safety code problems requiring
substantial renovation or complete redevelopment. OEhers require lesser
investments or cosmetic improvements to ensure their continued viability.
Building condition is included in Figure 3, Analysis of Existing Conditions.
B. LAND USE RELATIONSHIPS
Much of the charm of 44th and France is its eclectic and somewhat haphazard
development pattern. However, this development pattern has created some
problems. First, the commercial area is not clearly defined. This has resulted
in the conversion of some single family homes to non - residential uses. It has
also resulted in disinvestment in single family homes because they are isolated
from other single family homes and relate only to non - residential uses. The
lack of a clear definition of the retail center and the lack of transitional
buffers is a blighting influence on single family homes nearby.
The Edina Cleaners is located at the corner of France Avenue and Sunnyside Road,
near the center of the retail district. In addition to its original structure
the cleaners occupies what was originally the Westgate Theatre. In addition to
its retail function Edina Cleaners operates a large -scale dry cleaning plant.
This industrial use is inappropriate in a neighborhood scale retail center.
4
I
Morningside Rd. a 13
❑ n❑J❑! 0 119
a, F ❑ I i
❑ n F I i
Id ;_--p T.—
CITY OF EDINA
PROJECT AREA PLANS
44TH AND FRANCE AVE.
Hoisingcon Group Inc.
0 X00 Zo — T
1 o /
— Parking Deficiency
,I (Low Building To Land Ratio
Some Substandard Housing
— Commercial On Street Parking
7�-Unsightly Power Lines
// Nice Building Facade; Preserve Image
Parking Deficiency
— Key Intersection
Need To Architecturally Link Two
Sides Of Street And Create a Retail
District Focus
Alley; Poor Site Lines
Substandard Buildings (2)
— Parking Deficiency
J
Steep Slopes
J .
Inappropriate Land Use (Garage)
Substandard Structure
Substandard House
Modest; Well Maintained Homes
1
I 46th
Legend:
T i _ S.F. Single Family
M.F. Multi Family
O Office
R Retail
I Industrial
Figure 3
ANALYSIS
Parcels south of the Edina Cleaners contain inappropriate and obsolete land
uses. The building conditions range from substandard to fairly good. Two
single family homes, one used for office space, are substandard and should be
razed. The uses do not relate well to each other or to other nearby residential
areas.
The central portion of the business district is served by a relatively large
surface parking 'area accessed from several curb cuts along Sunnyside Road. The
shared parking area is owned by a number of property owners, primarily those.
fronting on Sunnyside Road. Poor access, grade differentials, and no
organization of the spaces and drive aisles makes this very inefficient parking.
The central portion of the district contains a variety of retail and office use
which are compatible. However, the offices uses along 44th Street do have a
adverse effect on residential properties on the north side of 44th Street. This
has resulted in a lack of maintenance and reinvestment resulting in substandard
buildings.
III. REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
(Figure 4 - Redevelopment Plan; Figure 5 - Public Improvements Plan)
A. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
Revitalize and concentrate the focus of the 44th and France retail area without
disturbing the historical character or function of the area.
5
Rd. a!
.1
0o a
Low To I
adium Density Retail
�amiiy Housing
�1
St• 1
AAtt• Re
I
Q 1
CITY OF EDINA
PROJECT AREA PLANS
44TH AND FRANCE AVE.
Hoisington Group Inc.
0 100 zoo 300
I
1
1
I
1 LL
I
1
1
i 46th
ilI
..o... Project Area
Figure 4
REDEVELOPMENT
PLAN
I
Morningside Rd.
L J ❑ 113 ❑
a
Low To
Medium Density
Multi- Family Housing
0
0.
0
I
U
CITY OF EDINA
PROJECT AREA PLANS
i=
i� 0
i
I I j l i
Retail j
Street Improvements
i
Undergrounding of
' Electric Utilities
i
j Parking Lot Improvements
Entry Feature
I 45th
1
Retail
1
® i
i
I
' Landscaping
44TH AND FRANCE AVE.
Hoisington Group Inc
0 100 200 .3oo
i
i
i
i
i
i
1 46th
....... Project Area
Figure 5
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
PLAN
Emphasize the historical roots of old Morningside Town Center.
Encourage participation by all groups or agencies affected by the Redevelopment
Plan, including, but not limited to property' owners, tenants, City of
Minneapolis, and the Edina City Council.
Improve the transition from the Commercial area to the surrounding single family
neighborhood through buffering techniques and by the redevelopment of
inappropriate and incompatible uses.
Implement Design guidelines to address appropriate building design, scale,
materials, signage and street scape landscaping for the area.
Intensify the retail mass to improve the drawing power and ensure the continued
viability of the area as a neighborhood scale retail district.
Redevelopment projects should reflect the historical character of Morningside
Town Center.
Encourage and assist private redevelopment consistent with the Redevelopment
Plan which would not otherwise happen through:
* Land Acquisition
* Demolition /Clearance
* Site Assembly
* Land Write Downs
* Interest Assistance
C.
* Relocation
* Public Improvements
Reduce conflicts between pedestrians and vehicles.
B. REDEVEI,OPMEIgT PROJECTS
The Redevelopment Plan Project encompasses both public and private property.
Elements of individual projects are outlined below.
1. Public Improvements
It is the intent of this project to correct problems with public streets
sidewalks and other public and private utility systems throughout the
Redevelopment Plan Area. The public improvements project includes the following
activities:
* Property Acquisition to provide public parking in the central portion
of the Plan Area.
* Placing existing overhead utilities underground.
* Reconstruction of existing parking areas.
* Public Street improvements.
* Pedestrian /sidewalk improvements.
* Landscaping - streetscape improvements.
* Providing identification of the Morningside Town Center
7
In addition to the public improvements throughout the Plan Area, the
Redevelopment Plan illustrates several other redevelopment projects. In order
to achieve the goals and objectives of the Redevelopment Plan the Housing and
Redevelopment Authority expects to participate in the redevelopment activities.
Public activities which may be included in each project may include:
* Property Acquisition.
* Clearance and'site assembly and site preparation.
* Relocation.
* Land sales to private redevelopers.
* Vacation of public rights of way.
* Land write down
* Interest Assistance
2. Residential Redevelopment
The redevelopment project area is located north of 44th Street and west of
France Avenue. The project includes what is presently four single family homes.
The property faces office buildings and surface parking lots on the south side
of 44th street. This land use conflict, the current underutilization of land,
and the substandard condition of some of the buildings, and the fact that 44th
Street is a collector street suggest multi - family as a more appropriate use of
the property. The Redevelopment Plan illustrates redevelopment of the
properties with low to medium density residential development. The
redevelopment site could support between 10 and 16 dwelling units.
L
3. gxpansion of Existing Businesses
The Redevelopment Plan anticipates expansion potential for businesses in several
areas. The first area is at the northwest corner of France Avenue and West 44th
Street. The project would accommodate a small expansion of the existing
antique /furniture store and provide additional off - street parking. The second
area of expansion would be for the first two buildings south of the intersection
of 44th Street -on France Avenue. The third area includes the four small office
buildings on Sunnyside Road. The expansion may involve the renovation and..
expansion of individual buildings or it may include the redevelopment of some or
all properties. Although public involvement may be required it is expected that
most activities will be privately facilitated.
4. Retail Redevelopment
The redevelopment includes what is presently the complex of buildings used by
Edina Cleaners, a automotive service center, and a vehicle storage garage. The
redevelopment also includes two residential properties immediately west of the
Edina cleaners site fronting on Sunnyside Road. The Redevelopment Plan
illustrates 15,000 to 20,000 square feet of retail space and off- street parking.
The redevelopment will be the focus of Morningside Town Center. It is expected
that the redeveloped retail center will mimic the existing retail development
north of Sunnyside, preserving the store front character of the area.
5. Office Redevelopment
E
I
The redevelopment project includes three single family homes in the southerly
portion of the Plan Area The project could be expanded by adding the two most
southerly parcels in the Plan Area.
Two of the homes have converted to office use and three remain single family
residences. The Redevelopment Plan anticipates a redevelopment of all five
parcels, with an office building containing 6,000 to 8,000 square feet of floor
area.
10
18A —Edina Su fed., March 14, 1990
5 reach 100
Remember the sinking of the
Titanic in 1912? Most don't, but
five residents of Edina's Rem -
brandt Retirement Community
remember well.
Signe Haugen crossed the
Atlantic from her native Nor-
way in 1907 at the age of 19. "I
recall my own experiences
aboard ship,. when I heard the
Titanic had sunk," Haugen said.
Haugen was born Feb. 17,
1888. She and four other Rem -
brandt residents were all born
within a year or two of each
other in the late 1800s: Lillian
Mueller, Feb. 1, 1888; William
Kirk, March 22,1889; Josephine
Erickson, Aug. 23, 1889; and
Marian Bussey, March 10, 1890.
Lillian Mueller has been a
resident at Rembrandt since
1975. The Rembrandt residents
celebrated their 100th birthdays
with friends, sharing memories
and a special birthday cake
March 9.
"There would be more
candles than cake if they put
them all on," Kirk said. Kirk
will celebrate his 101st birthday
on March 22.
The following students from
Edina have been recognized for
academic achievement at their
respective colleges and univer-
sities: Kathleen Hayden, Col-
lege of St. Catherine; Vicki
Iversen, Kristina Kalich,
University of Wisconsin -River
Falls; Jonathan Fisher,
Rensselaer Polytechnic
Institute.
Dan Doheny, Edina, has
received his master of arts
degree from the University of
Minnesota.
Daniel Getsch, Edina, was an-
nounced as a member of the
1989 -90 Cathedral Choir at
Luther College.
Jason Elliott and Debra
Schulze, Edina, graduated from
Winona State .University after
fall quarter-. -
Peter Nelson, Edina, received
a Northern Bank Scholarship at
Luther College for the 1989 -90
academic year.
Sandra Kim, Edina, has been
named a finalist in the National
Merit Scholarship Competition.
Kim, a senior at Breck School,
was one of 11 students, or 10 per-
cent of the graduating class,
named as a finalist.
The following students from
Edina graduated from Mankato
State University: Peter Cole,
Richard Esensten, Ardelle
Hansen, Katherine Reichow.
of Edina
(Official Publication)
CITY OF EDINA
4801 W. 50TH STREET
EDINA, MINNESOTA 5.5424
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
ON AMENDMENTS TO THE
SoTH AND FRANCE
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN OF TILE
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City
Council of the City of Edina will hold a public
hearing on Amendments to the 50th and France
Redevelopment Plan (the Redevelopment Plan)
of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of
Edina, Minnesota (the HRA) at 7:00 P.M. on Mon.
day, March 2s, 1990, at the Edina City Hall, 4801
West 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota.
The Amendments to the Redevelopment Plan
authorizes additional Public improvements to be
constructed and provides for additional proper -
ty to be included in the area subject to the
Redevelopment Plan (the Redevelopment Area).
The additional property to be included in the
Redevelopment Area is the property included in
the area subject to the Southeast Edina
Redevelopment Plan of the HRA, and is located
in the extreme southeast portion of the City (the
Additional Property). The Amendments to the
Redevelopment Plan authorize the use of tax in-
crements derived from the tax increment financ-
ing district of the HRA established by the
Redevelopment Plan (the District) to provide for
the payment by the HRA or the City of the costs
of the additional public improvements authorized
by the Amendment and the costs of certain public
redevelopment costs previous)y incurred and to
be incurred in connection with the redevelopment
to the Additional Property pursuant to the
Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan and the
financing of such costs by the HRA, and the City
of Edina. The costs to be paid for with tax incre-
ment may be paid either directly from the tax in.
crements or may be paid with proceeds of bonds
or other obligations issued by the HRA or City the
principal of and interest on which is yable from
tax increment derived from the District. The
kmendments to the Redevelopment Plan do not
nclude the Additional Property in the District.
Accompany this notice is a map of a rtion
if the City of dina. The area includedn the
District is labelled'B" on the map, and the areas
in the City in which tax increment from the
District may be expended following adoption of
Lhe proposed amendment are the areas labelled
B" and "C"
All who wish to be heard as to the Amendments
o the Redevelopment Plan will be given an op-
lortunity to express their views at the time of the
wblic hearing or may file written comments with
he City Clerk prior to the public hearing
3Y ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL.
AARCELLA M. DAEHN
}ty Clerk
(March 14,1990)-ED
City of Edina
(Official Publication)
CITY OF EDINA
4901 W. 50TH STREET
EDINA, MINNESOTA smu
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
ON DESIGNATION OF
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AND
APPROVAL OF TAX INCREMENT
FINANCING PLANS
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City
Council of the City of Edina will hold a public
hearing on the proposed designation by the City
Council of Development District No. 2 (the
Development District) and on the adoption of a
Development Program for the Development
District (the Development Program), pursuant
to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 465.12A and 469.L34,
and on the proposed approval by the City Coun-
cil of Tax Increment Financing Plans (the
Financing Plans) which create three Tax Incre-
ment Financing Districts (the Tax increment
Districts) in the City. The public hearing will be
held at 7:00 p.m. on Monday. April 2, 1990, at the
Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina.
Minnesota.
Three separate areas are to be included in the
Development District. These areas are located at
West 44th Street and France Avenue, Valleyview
Road and Wonddale Avenue and West 70th Street
and Cahill Road. The Development Program
describes the objectives of the City in connection
with the development of the property in the
Development District and certain activities pro-
posed to be undertaken by the City to accomplish
such objectives.
Each of the three areas to be included within
the Development District will be included in a
separate Tax Increment District pursuant to the
Financing Plans.
Under the Financing Plans, tax increments
derived from the Tax Increment Districts would
be used for the ppaeyment of costs of the City of car-
rying out the Development Program or for the
payment of debt service on bonds or other obliga-
tions to be issued by the City for payment of such
costs. it is proposed that all tax revenues from
the Tax Increment Districts resulting from in-
creases in the tax capacity of taxable real prop-
erty therein be segregated and applied to pay-
ment of costs of the Ci:. in carrying out the
Development Program.
Accompanying this notice is a map of a portion
of the City. The areas to be included in the
Development District and in the Tax Increment
Districts are labelled "A" on the map.
All who wish to be heard as to the designation
of the Development District and on the approval
of the Financing Plans will be given an �pom
ty to express their views at the time of the public
heaarinnlg or pmay file writttuen comments with the bb h
City BY ORDER OF THEIEI INA CITY COUNCIL.
MARCELLA M. DAEHN
City Clerk
(March 14,1990)-ED
u-ban
)ying
'a irly
oper-
es of
) the
)mis-
an to
e 15
Fred
icing
iden-
vn to
)mes
kay 1
je in
s of
(pay
nore
are
ser-
iree-
tro
axes
ser-
( as
are
i go
Late
heir
vide
can
aid.
I not
rate
•ould
Lure.
cur-
's a
)ge 4
bees
;uucation materials in
pools putting kids to sleep?
grader, knows. She had to sit Sound great? It should. Ad-
through instruction. ministrators and teachers say
ad of "Well, they never told us it's what Edina parents want in
Why anything that we already didn't sex education.
ILA - V%^wIUR
:3 CIO
`o
City examines TIF
to beat deadline
By Cindy Eggert
Dr. Frank Sidell has owned a
clinical practice at the corner of
Wooddale Avenue and Valley
View Road for 30 years — before
the area was even a part of
Edina.
Sidell is one of several
business owners who saw at a
recent City Council meeting
plans to redevelop three
business areas: 44th and France
avenues; Cahill Road and 70th
Street; and Valley View Road
and Wooddale Avenue.
The Edina Housing and
Redevelopment Authority ( the
City Council) is considering
establishing tax increment
financing (TIF) districts in
those areas before March 30.
The action is required, council
members said at the March 19
meeting, because the
Legislature is considering two
bills that could restrict the city's
ability to establish TIF districts
in the future. And that could
ultimately hamper the city's
ability to spur redevelopment of
older or blighted areas.
At first blush, however, retail
owners were less than en-
thusiastic in their response to
the city's plans.
"The plan, as presented.
would devalue my property,"
Sidell said. "(The plans) don't
do us anything but detriment."
His comments were in reac-
tion to a design concept for an
area along Valley View Road
from Best Reflections Hair Styl-
ing at Oaklawn Avenue to Valley
View Center west of Wooddale
Avenue.
Designed by consultants from
the Hoisington Group and city
staff, plans reflect the following
goals: increase the amount of
off - street parking; correct park-
ing and circulation problems:
improve access and traffic flow:
and create a better transition
between commercial and
residential areas..
In the 44th and France area.
the consultant said the aim is to
preserve and enhance the area's
"downtown Morningside" at-
mosphere. Other improvements
would be to: buffer single family
homes from commercial uses;
intensify the area's retail com-
ponent to draw more con-
sumers; and implement
guidelines to address building
design, scale and materials.
"If you remove the building
TIF: To next pare
70th and Cahill slated
for housing project
By Cindy Eggert
School and church bells have
long been silent on the corner of
70th Street and Cahill Road.
The church building was once
site of the first Irish settlement
in the city, St. Patrick's Church.
And in the '50s, an elementary
school was built and served
Edina Public Schools until
declining enrollment of the late
'70s forced its sale.
Now both properties are the
subject of a controversial
development issue which came
before the Edina City Council
March 19. Edina developer Ron
Clark wants to build 13 single
family homes on what is con-
sidered the "school" property
4nd 21 townhomes on what is
how the school parking lot and
former church property.
Residents surrounding the
area had mixed reaction to the
proposal. Some said the types of
housing on the site are ap-
propriate. Others decried the
density of the project, par-
ticularly the townhomes, and
their proximity to homes on the
north side of West 70th Street.
The City Council last week
gave the proposal preliminary
approval, subject to several con-
ditions to be resolved before a
second vote set April 2.
"Residents invested in their
property because they thought
there would be an Edina
elementary school across the
street," said homeowner
Stephen Smithson, 5608 W. 70th
St. "Now they're faced with en-
croaching higher density units
which lessen the desirability and
value of our homes.''
F'owever, others at the
meeting spoke in favor of the
development. "We have the best
of both worlds in this proposal,"
said Darlene McDonnel, a resi-
dent of another Clark develop-
ment just south of the property
in question.
CAHILL: To next page
�A —Edina Sun - Current —Wed.. March 28. 1990
TIF
From previous page
and come up with a mall-type
development, you'll change the
whole structure of 44th and
France," said Jim VanValken-
burg, an attorney representing
owners of Edina Cleaners and a
past mayor.
Specifically, he addressed
plans that would reconfigure
parking in the area, limiting
most on -street parking and shif-
ting much of it to common lots
behind the retail shops.
"If you take away our parking
you're taking us out of
business," VanValkenburg said
of the cleaners.
In the Cahill shopping area,
there are two design alter-
natives which have the same
goals: update the area's design
and retail needs; improve tran-
sitions from commercial and
residential; and create oppor-
tunities for new businesses to
locate there.
Though initial reaction to the
proposals seemed lukewarm, ci
ty officials emphasized the plans
were not cast in stone and were
primarily offered to foster
discussion of TIF districts.
"Nothing is being proposed to
undertake a project or
redevelopment process," said
Mayor Fred Richards. "What
we're doing here is to make sure
that this council, whether that is
one of these elected officials or
one in the future, will have the
tools to begin the process if that
is what is needed.
"We see the window is closing.
For whatever reason, the
Legislature may restrict cities'
ability to use tax increment
financing," Richards said.
"What I think staff is saying is
that if we don't do. this, we are
precluding ourselves from using
a tool that could be of help
redeveloping in the future."
Bills in Legislature
could change TIF laws
The Senate Tax Committee
Friday passed one of two TIF
bills in the _I egislatuce that
could restrict; cities' ability to
use the redevelopment tool in
the future.
Critics of current TIF laws
say cities have used the pro-
cess for projects that_ night
have occurred without public
assistance.
For instance, legislators
point to a case involving the ci-
ty of Minneapolis in which they
feel TIF funds were used
inappropriately.
Minneapolis gave $3 million
of TIF funds to a developer to
keep the height of a proposed
building near Lake Calhoun
below a certain height.
Another snag in current TIF
laws, according to critics, is
that other local forms of
government, such as the coun-
ty or schools, are deprived of
increases in local tax revenue.
Taxes generated from a TIF
district are divied up in two
ways. The amount'that was
generated before redevelop-
ment occurred continues to go
into local, county and state cof-
fers. However, "excess" taxes
— generated by the more
valuable, redeveloped proper-
ty — go to pay off bond debts.
Once bonds are paid off, the
taxes revert to all local govern-
ments. The benefit of TIF, city
officials say, is that once a
bond debt is retired, the local
governments realize greater
revenue that might not have
occurred without public
assistance.
But school and county
associations say waiting 10-25
years for that increase in fun-
ding is unfair.
Minnesota Suburban Publications reserves the right to decline
advertisements that are in violation of the law, untrue, misleading or
deceptive.
Minnesota Suburban Publications cannot assume responsibility for
the licensing of all advertisers and, therefore, urges consumers to check
with local licensing departments to assure that businesses possess the
appropriate license to operate a business or work in a specific
community.
on
This blighted building
brings the city $25,000
in taxes annually.
A development firm wants
to construct a building on
this site that could bring
the city $125,000 in taxes
annually.
Tax increment financing
(TIF) is a tool cities have
historically used to encourage
development or redevelop-
ment of blighted or run -down
areas.
Often TIF is used when a
parcel, for whatever reasons,
is too costly to be considered
for private development.
For instance, developers
might not consider developing
a site composed of several
small parcels of privately own-
The city sells
bonds to pay
for clearing the
old building off
the land.
ed land. But a city could create
a TIF district, purchase the
sections and in turn, sell the
single property to a developer.
To finance these actions,
cities sell TIF bonds. They
then use the money to pur-
chase land and sometimes
raze delapidated buildings to
offer property in a "develop-
ment ready" state.
Cities also use money from
bond sales to pay for public im-
The it
taxes
by the
ing -
IS USE
the bl
provem
and seN
To pe
will "c:
the TI
general
its valt
with re
Once
tire tax
"excel:
is retw
rolls.
Cahill: Development `includf
family homes and 21 town]
From previous page
"The density has been scaled
back, and (residents on the
north side of West 70th) aren't
going to see anything more than
if there were single family
homes. I'm for it and I think
another developer could propose
something far worse," McDon-
nel said.
After initial review by the
Planning and Zoning Board,
Clark decreased the number of
townhouses from 25 to 21 on 4.2
acres, making a density of 5
units per acre. The 13 single
Family homes are on about 8.6
acres, or about 1.5 units per
acre.
Though the proposal was scal-
ed back, some residents con-
tinued to oppose the project,
particularly the density of the
townhomes.
"I'm restoring one of the
oldest homes in Edina and I live
in this area. I've spoken to many
people in the neighborhood and
the people I've talked to are 100
percent opposed," said Ted
Steen, 5524 W. 70th St. He later
submitted letters from more
than 100 residents stating their
objections.
Residents also objected to the
level of traffic they expect the
project to generate. And they
questioned the site's historical
designation and whether or not
the former church building was
protected by that designation.
"I think the Heritage Preser-
vation Board has said the
building itself has no historical
significance, although the foun-
dation and site may," said Coun-
cil Member Jane Paulus. "For
WALKAWAY
]Fansick.., r ,
Cahill: Development-Inel-ades single
family homes and 21 townhomes
From previous page
"The density has been scaled
back, and (residents on the
north side of West 70th) aren't
going to see anything more than
if. there were single family
homes. I'm for it and I think
another developer could propose
something far worse," McDon-
nel said.
After initial review by the
Planning and Zoning Board,
Clark decreased the number of
townhouses from 25 to 21 on 4.2
acres, making a density of 5
units per acre. The 13 single
family homes are on about 8.6
acres, or about 1.5 units per
acre.
Though the proposal was scal-
ed back, some residents con-
; tinued to oppose the project,
�-particularly the density of the
townhomes.
"I'm restoring one of the
-oldest homes in Edina and I live
in this area. I've spoken to many
people in the neighborhood and
the people I've talked to are 100
percent opposed," said Ted
Steen, 5524 W. 70th St. He later
submitted letters from more
than 100 residents stating their
objections.
Residents also objected to the
level of traffic they expect the
project to generate. And they
questioned the site's historical
designation and whether or not
the former church building was
protected by that designation.
"I think the Heritage Preser-
vation Board has said the
building itself has no historical
significance, although the foun-
dation and site may," said Coun-
cil Member Jane Paulus. "For
WALKAWAY
FROM y
FOOT PROBLEMS-,,,
Are Corns and Callouses
Slowing You Down?
Well, no need to suffer any longer. Corns and callouses are often
caused from small bumps or spurs on the underlying bone. An in-
office surgical procedure can often eliminate these common foot
problems permanently. The patient is able to walk out of the office
(Foot Clinic) with no cast and no hospital stay is necessary.
common Foot Probf+er»� Treaed #n Qur Office �r�slutfe, �
.� •Corns & Callouses � • Pamful�Heels �' �• �ienl+loat Nai15C:ure���
•Bunaons: •:Warts E_� •Ing�o�vxtNa't�'s'�
Office Hours br Appointment
FOOT CL IC
ASSOCIATED PODIATRISTS
e� Dr. Christopher Weis
Q ��o� 6344 Penn Ave. So.
L Richfield, MN 55423
me, this area lost its historical
significance years ago when the
shops and farms gave way to
development. And if we do
something to commemorate the
Irish settlement in Edina, it
should include the whole Cahill
prea."
Council members supported
the development for several
reasons including: the number
of Oew single family homes it
will generate; a decrease in
traffic, according to projections
(mainly because the Montessori
school will be gone) ; and the low
density of the townhomes (as
defined in the city's Comprehen-
sive Plan).
"Density is a very important
issue to me," said Mayor Fred
Richards. "I think the density
issue has been properly address-
ed. The Comprehensive Plan
shows a higher density could be
put here, but the developer isn't
asking for that."
Council Member Glenn Smith,
who lives in the neighborhood,
echoed comments about less
traffic being generated by the
housing development.
"I understand traffic con-
cerns, but I understand there
will be substantially less traffic
in the neighborhood if this pro-
ject goes in."
Smith also said the
townhouses serve as a good,
albeit frustrating, buffer bet-
ween high density housing south
on Cahill and homeowners on
West 70th Street.
The developer must address
the following issues prior to the
council vote April 2:
• Recognize settlers of western
Edina, whether at the project
site or elsewhere in the
community.
• Review and increase if
necessary guest parking in the
townhomes (now at 11 spaces).
• Review emergency vehicle
access.
• Review a bottleneck lot in the
single family portion.
1y
J
REPORURECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # IV. B.
From: Wayne D. Houle, PE # — Consent ❑
City Engineer Information Only ❑
Date: August 3, 2004 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
Subject: Continuation of Municipal To Council
Action ® Motion
State Aid Sidewalk - 4809 Resolution
to 4709 West 70th Street,
Improvement No. S -074. El Ordinance
❑ Discussion
Recommendation:
If the Council determines the project to be warranted and necessary, Council shall adopt a
resolution approving West 70th Street Sidewalk 'Improvement, Improvement No. S -074,
authorize plans and specifications to be completed and bids taken.
Info /Background:
This project was continued from the July 20, 2004 City Council Meeting. Additional information
was requested regarding the location of the sidewalk and the location of the mailboxes.
Attached you will find a copy of the July 20, 2004 staff report and feasibility study.
Staff recommends that a boulevard style sidewalk be placed throughout this project with the
exception of the furthest westerly property due to lack of right -of -way. A boulevard style
sidewalk does exist along both the north and south sides of West 70th Street from TH100 to
Sandell. Avenue (one block west of France Avenue). A curb -style sidewalk does exist between
Sandell Avenue and France Avenue due to the lack of right -of -way and space within this
commercial area. The existing sidewalk east of Cornelia Drive does meander to avoid trees;
some of these areas do become a curb -style sidewalk to avoid the trees. Staff will be replacing
portions of the sidewalk where trees have been removed or where settlement has occurred.
Staff is responsible for over 25 miles of sidewalks and walking paths. A temporary repair for
settlement areas does include placing bituminous pavement in the settled area until that portion
of the sidewalk can be replaced.
A boulevard style sidewalk will not create a smaller front yard for three of the four residences
compared to the majority of residences along West 70th Street, see attached photos.
Y�
Staff typically designs sidewalks using State and Federal standards. The federal register for
American with Disabilities Act (ADA) Accessibility Guidelines for Buildings and Facilities is silent
on placing a sidewalk against a raised curb such as what exists along West 70`h Street.
However, the Accessibility Guideline overview states that:
"Efforts should be made in the design of walks to prevent wheelchair wheels from rolling
off the walk and dropping to the level of grade. In this case many wheelchairs will
overturn and users are at risk of injury. "
If a curb -style sidewalk is chosen staff recommends that a two -foot exposed aggregate
concrete strip be placed between the curb and sidewalk. This strip will provide ample room to
maintain the mailboxes at the curb while also providing a change in surface to accommodate
the ADA issue, wheel chairs, and sight challenged pedestrians.
Staff continues to recommend the construction of this sidewalk, which will provide sidewalks
along both sides of West 701h Street. West 70th Street currently has 18,000 vehicles per day
(vpd) with an additional 1000 vpd expected by 2020. Although the City has not adopted criteria
for placement of sidewalks along both sides of higher functional roadways, the Guidelines for
Installing Sidewalks as published by Institute of Transportation Engineers recommends placing
sidewalks along both sides of the roadway for Residential (Major Arterials); West 70th Street is
classified as a "B" Minor Arterial.
Staff is revising our proposal to include a boulevard style sidewalk along the entire frontage of
Arneson Acres Park. This will involve the additional removal of trees and brush from the area
on the westerly side of Arneson Acres Park. This area will be revegetated, to provide a
screening of the Arneson Acres green house.
Staff has contacted John Lynch of the Normandale Branch 'of the US Postal Service regarding
placement of curbside mailboxes. Even though the City of Edina has many areas where
mailboxes are placed behind a curb -style sidewalk, see attached photos. The US Postal
regulations require that a mailbox be placed to allow safe and convenient delivery by carriers
without leaving their vehicles. The first reply from Mr. Lynch states that if "a carrier drives on
the sidewalk (it) would not be considered safe and convenient ", see attached facsimile. Mr.
Lynch also stated in a phone conversation that typically their carriers do deliver to these types
of mailboxes. Staff also feels that any vehicle that drives on a sidewalk presents an unsafe
condition for pedestrians, see attached photos.
Staff has reviewed the project and feels that the project is feasible from an engineering and
safety standpoint.
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
TO: Mayor & City Council
From: Wayne D. Houle, PE —
City Engineer
Date: July 20, 2004
Subject: Municipal State Aid
Sidewalk — 4809 to 4709
West 70th Street,
Improvement No. S -074.
Recommendation:
Agenda Item # V. E.
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
® To Council
Action ® Motion
® Resolution
❑ Ordinance
Discussion
If the Council determines the project to be warranted and necessary, Council shall
adopt a resolution approving West 70th Street Sidewalk Improvement, Improvement No.
S -074, authorize plans and specifications to be completed and bids taken.
Info /Background:
This project was initiated by the City Council through the 2003 / 2004 Municipal State
Aid Sidewalk Study and also through the 2004 -2008 Capital Improvement Program
(entrance improvement at Arneson Acres Park). Attached you will find the Feasibility
Study.
Staff recently informed the residents of the proposed project. Some of the affected
property owners indicated concern with the proposed sidewalk, see attached letter.
The westerly property owner is in favor of the sidewalk due to a physical disability that
has confined her to a wheel chair. The pedestrian travel shed for this missing sidewalk
segment could potentially include the neighborhood to the south that includes Larkspur
Lane, Aspasia Lane, Trillium Lane and Hibiscus Avenue to name a few. The total
estimated project cost is $113,000. Funding for this project would be from Municipal
State Aid System funds and revolving fund (as approved in the CIP).
Staff has reviewed the project and feels that the project is feasible from an engineering
and safety standpoint.
FEASIBILITY STUDY S -074
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF EDINA
SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS
West 70th Street from TH 100 to West Shore Drive
July 7, 2004
LOCATION: West 70th Street from TH 100 frontage road to West Shore Drive (see
Figure 1).
FIGURE 1. Location Map — West 70"' Street Sidewalk Improvement
INITIATION & ISSUES: The West 70th Street sidewalk improvement project from the TH 100
frontage road to West Shore Drive was initiated by City staff to analyze
the feasibility of completing a missing segment of sidewalk along West
70th Street that is part of the Municipal State Aid (MSA) Sidewalk
System identified in the City of Edina Transportation Plan (1999).
Additionally, staff presented a Municipal State Aid Sidewalk Study to the
City Council on March 4, 2003 and again on February 3, 2004 that
identified this missing segment of sidewalk along West 70th Street.
_
-_ -�—
Hsi
t
,f
1
t --
wo
\ /'`��PROJECT
`j
nooN
-V' �- LLOCATION -
J
s
1�-
�0
JTT --
1
1
Arnsson
Acres
Park
L
N
L.
��
_. •!
..........
0 100 200 400 fi00 B00
_
FIGURE 1. Location Map — West 70"' Street Sidewalk Improvement
INITIATION & ISSUES: The West 70th Street sidewalk improvement project from the TH 100
frontage road to West Shore Drive was initiated by City staff to analyze
the feasibility of completing a missing segment of sidewalk along West
70th Street that is part of the Municipal State Aid (MSA) Sidewalk
System identified in the City of Edina Transportation Plan (1999).
Additionally, staff presented a Municipal State Aid Sidewalk Study to the
City Council on March 4, 2003 and again on February 3, 2004 that
identified this missing segment of sidewalk along West 70th Street.
Feasibility Study S074
West 701h Street Sidewalk Improvements — TH 100 to West Shore Drive
July 7, 2004
Page 2
The following are existing features identified by staff that present issues
in determining the feasibility of the project and are addressed in this
report:
• Existing trees.
• Existing landscaping.
• Steep existing boulevard slopes.
• Existing underground utility lines and light poles.
The proposed sidewalk segment will provide access for pedestrians
traversing the south side of West 70th Street. This will also comply with
the current Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accessibility
guidelines and provide access to Arneson Acres Park for pedestrians
from both east and west of the park.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: West 70th Street is part of the City's designated Municipal State Aid
Roadway System (MSA). West 70th Street consists of a 40 foot wide
roadway with concrete curb and gutter along both sides of the street.
The original bituminous street was constructed in 1955 and
reconstructed and upgraded with concrete pavement in 1961. An
existing sidewalk is located along the north side of West 70th Street and
along the south side to approximately 250 feet west of West Shore
Drive up to the east edge of Arneson Acres Park where the walk
terminates. The posted speed limit on West 701h Street is 30 mph.
The south boulevard between the frontage road and Arneson Acres
Park abuts four residential properties. The boulevards in these
locations consist of fairly level slopes with numerous trees, bushes,
landscaping and mailboxes (see Photo 1).
PHOTO 1. West 70th Street (Looking towards TH 100)
Feasibility Study S074
West 701h Street Sidewalk Improvements — TH 100 to West Shore Drive
July 7, 2004
Page 3
The remainder of the project abuts City property along Arneson Acres
Park. The boulevard adjacent to the park consists of steep, heavily
vegetated back slopes and underground utility lines and poles (see
Photo 2).
PHOTO 2. West 70th Street (Looking west from West Shore Drive)
IMPROVEMENT: The proposed improvements for this project include construction of a
sidewalk along the south side of West 70th Street from the TH 100
frontage road (Normandale Boulevard) to 250 feet west of West Shore
Drive (see Figure 2).
The proposed sidewalk is required to be constructed to MSA standards.
The typical sidewalk will be five -foot wide with five -foot wide boulevards.
However, curb -style walk with no boulevard will be constructed at the
west end of the project for 70 -feet and to the west of the Arneson Acres
Park entrance to minimize easement needs, property impacts, grading
impacts and tree impacts. Retaining walls will also be constructed in
several locations adjacent to the proposed walk to accommodate
existing, steep boulevards. Existing utility lines and light poles will be
relocated by the private utility companies.
In addition to the sidewalk improvements, the Arneson Acres Park
driveway is proposed to be widened to provide better access into and
out of the park.
Feasibility Study S074
West 701h Street Sidewalk Improvements — TH 100 to West Shore Drive
July 7, 2004
Page 4
FIGURE 2. PROPOSED SIDEWALK - WEST 70TH STREET
RIGHT -OF -WAY
& EASEMENTS: The right -of -way for West 70th Street is typically 73 feet wide. A
sidewalk easement is required and has been acquired from the resident
located at 4809 West 70"' Street to allow the construction of the walk to
extend to the frontage road where the boulevard and available right -of-
way width narrows. Additionally, significant grading is required along
Arneson Acres Park that requires encroachment onto park property.
The remainder of the sidewalk and construction impacts will be
constructed within existing right -of -way.
FEASIBILITY: The project is feasible, both from an Engineering standpoint and
fiscally.
ASSESSMENTS: The cost of this project will not be assessed. Revenue for this
project is available through the funds the City receives from the State
Gas Tax funds for maintenance and construction of roadways,
Municipal State Aid (MSA) funds. However, MSA funding would not be
applicable for the Arneson Acres Park driveway. The funding for this
portion has been approved in the 2004 -2008 Capital Improvement
Program.
f
Feasibility Study S074
West 70t`' Street Sidewalk Improvements — TH 100 to West Shore Drive
July 7, 2004
Page 5
PROJECT COSTS: The total estimated project cost is $113,300 and includes indirect
costs of 15% for engineering and clerical costs. See summary of the
Project Cost Estimate below.
TOTAL CONSTRUCITON COST: $ 98,500
15% ENGINEERING & CLERICAL: $ 14,800
RIGHT -OF- WAY /EASEMENT COSTS: $ 0
TOTAL PROJECT COST: $ 113,300
PROJECT SCHEDULE: The City Council is scheduled to receive the Feasibility Report on
Tuesday, July 20, 2004. Upon Council approval, this project will be
scheduled for construction in late summer of 2004.
j aC/
City of Edina
June 24, 2004
Anne Marie Plante, 4801 West 70"' Street, Edina, MN 55435
David and Donna Hamilton, 4805 West 70"' Street, Edina, MN 55435
Donald and Dorthy Barck, 4807 West 70th Street, Edina, MN 55435
RE: Letter dated June 19, 2004
West 70th Street Sidewalk Project
Dear Residents:
Thank you for your letter dated June le that refers to your letter to Mayor Maetzold
regarding the above project. This project will be discussed at the July 20"', City
Council Meeting. The meeting will start at 7:00 PM in the Council Chambers located
at Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street. Even though this is not a public hearing
staff is recommending that the Council at this meeting take testimony from the public.
If you have any questions or need additional information please contact me at 952-
826 -0443 or at whouleCa-ci.edina.mn.us.
Sincerely,
Wayne D. Houle, PE
Director of Public Works / City Engineer
Enclosures
C: Mayor and Council
Gordon Hughes — City Manager
Ronald & Ruth Johnson, 4809 West 70"' Street, Edina, MN 55435
City Hall 952 - 927 -8861
4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390
EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952 - 826-0379
4801 West 701h Street
Edina, MN 55435
June 16, 2004
Mayor Dennis Maetwld
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424 -1394
Dear Mayor Maenold:
As property owners on the south side of West 70'h Street, we request cancellation of the proposed extension of
public sidewalks from Arneson Acres Park to Highway 100 for the following reasons:
• We were neither consulted nor notified of the project prior to the written notification dated 9 June from
Edma's Director of Public Works, Mr. Wayne Houle. Anne Marie Plante discussed the project with Mr.
Houle by phone on June 16. In that conversation, Mr. Houle stated the project was approved in March
2003. The City Council minutes for February and March 2003 make no specific mention of this project.
Mr. Houle stated that homeowners did not need to be consulted m advance since the funding source was
Metro State Aid rather than local assessmem
• The City of Edina has not rated this as a high - priority project. In the minutes of March 4, 2003 (see
attachment), Mr. Houle stated that there were projects of "high priority" (on Tracy, Blake and Interlachen,
Brookside; and Valley View). Mr. Houle also noted, "the City's adopted Sidewalk Adoption Policy
requires initiation of sidewalks to be resident driven " This is certainly not true of this project.
• The pedestrian traffic along West 70 does not warrant the expense of the project.
The tremendous volume of poorly regulated traffic along West 70P in both directions (16,000+ vehicles on
most weekdays) renders West 7e inhospitable to pedestrians and bilkers. The north side of the street
already has a sidewalk fi+om France to Highway 100 that is, hardly ever used.
• The project negatively impacts aesthetic quality of the street. The appropriation of more than nine feet
of residential property, with attendant plowing and salt damage, will impair the owners' ability to properly
maintain their front yards. The sidewalk will not have a uniform distance from the street. The setback from
dwellings is much less than that of the existing sidewalk on the north side of West 70a. Construction would
also entail the removal of trees and flower planters at Arneson Acres Park. This would reduce the aesthetic
value of both the park and adjacent properties.
Since this project has not received final approval from the Minnesota Department of Transportation, Metro State
Aid, we request its cancellation. Please do not hesitate to contact any of us with your questions.
S, ly.
Marie Plante, 4801 Wpst 70d, Street
'Zona]dand Barck, 4807 West 7& Street
Donna Hamilton, 48MWest 7e Street
Attachments: (1)
IN TO)CICATING and SUNDAY SALE: Big Bowl Caft, California Pizza Kitchen, Eden Avenue Grill,
Maggiano's Restaurant & Bakery, P.F. Chang's Bistro, Roman's Macaroni Grill, Ruby Tuesday,
Sidney's Pizza Caft, Tejas, The Cheesecake Factory and Two Guys'From Italy; CLUB ON -SALE and
SUNDAY SALE: Edina Country Club and Interlachen Country Club- Member Housh seconded the
motion
Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold
Motion carried.
ON -SALE WINE AND ON -SALE 3.2 BEER LICENSE RENEWALS APPROVED Mr- Hughes
presented the list of restaurants holding On -Sale Wine and On-Sale Beer Licenses recommended for
approval. He noted that when licenses receiving both an on -sale Wine license and an on -sale 3.2 license
may as per State Statute with no further license sell strong beer in their restaurants. Mr. Hughes
reported that all necessary documentation has been submitted for. renewal, fees collected, and the
Police Department recommended renewal.
Member Hovland made a motion to approve issuance of ON -SALE and ON -SALE 3.2 BEER Licenses
as follows: Beaujo's Bistro, Boundary Waters Restaurant, Chuck E. Cheese's, D'Amico & Sons, Edina
Grill, Good Earth Restaurant, Locanda De Giorgio, Inc., Pizzeria Uno, Residence Inn Edina,
Szechuan Star Restaurant, and Yorktown Cinema Grill. Member Masica seconded the motion
Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold
Motion carried.
3.2 BEER LICENSE RENEWALS APPROVED Mr. Hughes presented a list of applicants for renewal of
their 3.2 beer licenses, both On-Sale and Off -Sale. All necessary documentation has been submitted for
renewal, fees have been collected and the Police Department recommended approval
Member Masica made .a motion approving issuance of beer license renewals as follows: ON -SALE
3.2 BEER LICENSES: Braemar Golf Course, Davanni's Pizza Hoagies, Fred Richards Golf Course,
New Hong Kong Kitchen,. TJ's Family Restaurant, and OFF-SALE 3.2 LICENSES: Cub Foods,
Holiday Stationstore #217, Jerry's Food, and Speedway SuperAmerica LLC. Member Hovland
seconded the motion
Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold
Motion carried.
REPORT PRESENTED ON STATE AID SIDWALKS Engineer Houle explained the Municipal State
Aid Sidewalk Report was held over from the February 18, 2003, Council meeting due to the late hour.
Council had requested staff analyze the "missing sidewalk segments" on the Municipal State Aid
roadway system. He informed the Council the City currently has 32 miles of Ninmesota State Aid
(MSA) and County State Aid Highway (CSAH) sidewalks. Many of the sidewalks and pathways were
constructed with adjacent developments and are missing critical sidewalk segments. The
Comprehensive Sidewalk / Pathway Plan was updated in 1999 as part of the City's Comprehensive Plan
update. The plan includes all existing sidewalks along with proposed MSA/ CSAH sidewalks and also
proposed local roadway sidewalks.
Mr. Houle staffed the proposed MSA sidewalks will add approximately twelve miles of sidewalks to the
existing system. Many of these segments will require extensive boulevard work to construct the
sidewalk or pathway and will also transverse many residential boulevards.
Mr. Houle noted missing sidewalk segments of high priority were: 1) Tracy Avenue near the
Crosstown, 2) Blake Road and Interlachen Boulevaz , 3) roo cside, and 4) Valley View Road to
http:// www. ci. edina. mn. us/ Pages/ CityCouncil __MeetingMinutes/20030304Reg.htin 6/15/04
MUCH Y, GVVJ L.:UU1a �.a►j w Vuaivu ..avv►u.b ..--- ----
z r�,
Concord Avenue and Concord to Concord School. In order to complete all 12 miles, an additional
$550,000 /year would be necessary in the State Aid budget. H tail the current Capital
Improvement Plan has appropriated $130,000 per year for sidewalks, not in the City's adopted
Sidewalk Adoption Policy requires initiation of sidewalks be resident driven or a state aid street
were being constructed, sidewalks could be included with the
Mr. Houle noted that some of the proposed sidewalks, such as Interlachen Boulevard
sidewalk /pathway, might qualify for Federal funding under the Transportation Enhancement
Program. He added the program was competitive and administered by the Metropolitan Council and
that would possible fill the need to develop creative funding sources for sidewalk construction.
Member Housh asked what process could to be followed to acquire funding through the Metropolitan
Council. Mr. Houle said Met Council examines the route requested, and length of pathway and points
were awarded in developing a priority list.
Member Masica said she was lobbying for sidewalks for the area between TH169 and Gleason Road on
Valley View because of a lot of cut- through traffic going to facilities at Braemar. She said she believed
the situation will worsen when the public safety training facility and medical building were completed.
Mr. Houle responded that a possible funding source for this segment may be to construct it in
conjunction with the Bredeson Park project.
Member Hovland indicated the City should go forward carefully noting the state's budget situation
Member Housh said other than federal funds; the City should be seeking grants to complete the
projects.
No formal Council action was taken.
RESOLUTION 'NO. 2003 -30 APPROVING SOUTH METRO PUBLIC SAFETY TRAINING
FACILITY GRANT Member Masica removed Resolution No. 2003 -30 from the consent agenda for
further information She inquired whether the joint Powers Agreement with the other involved cities
must be amended to comply with the State's request. Mr. Hughes stated that that has already been
accomplished
Member Masica introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption
RESOLUTION NO. 2003-30
WHEREAS, the City of Edina and the State of Minnesota propose to enter into a Grant
Agreement with respect to the South Metro Public Safety Training Center, and
WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota requests that the City of Edina adopt a resolution
clarifying ongoing operational responsibilities for said training center.
NOW THEREFORE BE TT RESOLVED that the City of Edina will assume responsibility for
the operational maintenance cost of the South Metro Public Safety Training Center, which are not
offset by operational revenues.
Adopted this 4h day of March 2003. Member Housh seconded the motion
Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold
Motion carried
*2003 LABOR AGREEMENT FOR LOCAL IAFF (FIRE) APPROVED Member Kelly made a motion
seconded by Member Hovland proving the 2003 Labor Agreement for Local IAFF (Fire) as follows:
1. Wages 311/6
http: / /www.ci.edina.mrLus/ Pages/ CityCounciLMeetingMinutes /20030304Reg.htm 6/15/04
0
�. \r�RilanV•�V"
City of Edina
June 9, 2004
West W Street Residents
Edina, MN
Re: Resident Letter No. 1
West 7e Street Sidewalk Project
Dear Resident:
The Edina City council has directed City staff to complete the missing segment of sidewalks that
are located on Municipal State Aid (MSA) roadways such as West 70 Street. City staff has been
working on plans for the missing sidewalk along the southerly side of West 7& Street from the
east property line of Arneson Acres Park to the east TH1OO frontage road. The proposed
sidewalk will provide a safe east -west pedestrian movement along the south side of West 701'
Street from the frontage road to West Shore Drive and beyond.
The City will maintain this sidewalk; which will include all snow removal, along with any physical
maintenance or liability due to the sidewalk. The majority of the sidewalk Is planned to be a
boulevard style sidewalk similar to sidewalk to the east. The sidewalk is planned within the
roadway right- of-way with the exception of 4809 West 7& Street where an easement will be
required. We are anticipating a late summer construction. Any areas disturbed by the
construction of this sidewalk will be repaired including sprinkler systems and invisible pet
containment systems.
I've enclosed a plan of this sidewalk for your information. Please contact me if you have any
concerns regarding the sidewalk at 952- 826 -0443 or whoulellci.edina.mn.us.
Sincerely,
Wayne D. Houle, PE
Director of Public Works / City Engineer
Enclosure
City Hall 952 - 927 -8861
FAX 952 - 826 -0390
4801 WEST 50TH STREET TTY 952 - 826-0379
EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com
N
�a
aa+TRAeTUe Mmm
1J SAVaft Cm TO REDONE AT GUTTER
PP
RUUM SAF-IVRR E�V�V�= DpLACE
4J CLEAR a am TREES SHM !T -x-
16
s D aSt F CURB WITH
63 V� a v LK a MAN
Niel
e
END NEW SIDEW4N
a� �— �_ _ _ F _ W 70TH ST
Pin —s — #- _-- - --
REMOVE EMST. rite
--+ �,_� --
SAV CUT CDC PA
' - - + -- V. 70T ST
I---
PED
ALL IiV CASTpRi
— — 1-
.. T T = _
-
�x cAm�{ I
_iW
Ta+E v
¢�
"M —
q
I V TALL CDC
4� 4807 I 4�
RoovE vmn PLANTER
I
a/D
D RAID
(
I
4101 l l>s a QN01
REMVE PILLAR
a►r
i
I I I
I
:wv a "T.
cm of am 7U I
i
ARNESM ACRES PARK
C3
lx
I I I
I
�
I
N
�a
aa+TRAeTUe Mmm
1J SAVaft Cm TO REDONE AT GUTTER
PP
RUUM SAF-IVRR E�V�V�= DpLACE
4J CLEAR a am TREES SHM !T -x-
16
s D aSt F CURB WITH
63 V� a v LK a MAN
Niel
e
PROPOSED SIDEWALK
AREA
TYPICAL SETBACKS
FROM BACK OF
SIDEWALK
t
40 FEET
I
t
40 FEET
I
r'
EXISTING SIDEWALK
AREA
West 70th Street: Proposed Sidewalk Extension - Improvement No. S074
TYPICAL SETBACKS v
FROM BACK OF±
SIDEWALK _
All
I, - -� : '�
40 FEET . �
lop
1 _
40 FEET
• .:
PROPOSED SIDEWALK EXISTING SIDEWALK
AREA AREA
West 70th Street: Proposed Sidewalk Extension - Improvement No. S074
'IOLA .4
rte` %lie t
r -
TYPICAL SETBACKS
FROM BACK OF
SIDEWALK
t
40 FEET
t
t
40 FEET
I
PROPOSED SIDEWALK EXISTING SIDEWALK
AREA AREA
West 70th Street: Proposed Sidewalk Extension - Improvement No. S074
Accessibility Guidelines
The third type of curb ramp is a built -up ramp that is within
the parking or street area and has flared sides as shown in
Figure 13. The main ramped portion of the curb ramp is limited
to a maximum slope of 1:12 or 1 inch rise in 12 inches of run.
The flared sides of appropriate curb ramps, as in Figure 12(a)
and Figure 13 presented maximum slope of 1:10. Of
preferred design three b
ramp options p eof the
returned curb as shown in Figure 12(b) and should have
planting and other non - walking surfaces alongside the curb
return as shown in the drawing.
It is interesting to note, the advantages found by incorporating
curb ramps for those who are in wheelchairs turn into disadvan-
tages for the visually impaired who use canes to signal changes
in levels and to determine where the street is. This is one of the
few instances where cross disabilities conflict in their benefits.
Because of the concern for the visually impaired, the ADA
Guidelines ( ADAAG) requires detectable warnings to desig-
nate where these curb ramps are located along the "accessible
route ". Truncated domes make up the detectable warning and
should be incorporated into the full depth and width of the curb
ramp.
' Walks should be between four and five feet wide, but are
actually required to be no less than three feet wide. They should
be constructed of a smooth hard material and their surface
should be slip resistant. The accessible route should not include
sidewalks that are loose gravel, sand, pine bark or any other
material that might catch a wheelchair wheel or might not
support the concentrated load of crutches as they are utilized in
the moving of a disabled person along the path. Again, the
walks should not have a slope greater than 1:20 unless ramp
provisions are incorporated.
Efforts should be made in the design of walks t6preverit
wheelchair wheels from rolling off;the_ walk and dropping to the'
level of grade In this'case'many wheelchairs will overturn and
users are at risk of iniury.j
Building Approach
Another major issue in dealing with the accessibility needs of a
particular facility is the building approach.
The most accessible entrance is that entrance which has the
least vertical rise required from the parking area to the floor of
the facility. Typically, this is the grade level entrance.
ADAAG requires, under their minimum requirements, that
is entrances" when all entrances are not accessible,
7
ADA Facilities Compliance,
192
Land- Use /Roadway
New Urban and
Existing Urban and
Functional
Suburban Streets
Suburban Streets
Classification/
and Dwelling Unit
Commercial and Industrial (All
Both sides.
Both sides. Every effort should
Streets)
be made to add sidewalks where
they do not exist and complete
missing links.
Residential (Major Arterials
Both sides. 9
Both sides. f
Residential (Collectors)
Both sides.
Multifamily —both sides.
Single family dwellings— prefer
both sides; require at least one
side.
Residential (Local Streets)
Both sides.
Prefer both sides; require at least
More than 4 Units Per Acre
one side.
1 to 4 Units per Acre
Prefer both sides; require at
At least 4 -feet shoulder on both
least one side.
sides required.
Less than 1 Unit per Acre
One side preferred; shoulder
One side preferred, at least
on both sides required.
4 -feet shoulder on both sides
required.
NOTES:
1) Any local street within two blocks of a school site that would be on a walking route to school —
sidewalk and curb and gutter required.
2) Sidewalks may be omitted on one side of a new street where that side clearly cannot be developed
and where there are no existing or anticipated uses that would generate pedestrian trips on that side.
3) Where there are service roads, the sidewalk adjacent to the main road may be eliminated and
replaced by a sidewalk adjacent to the service road on the side away from the main road.
4) For rural roads not likely to serve development, a shoulder at least 4 feet in width, preferably 8
feet on primary highways, should be provided. Surface material should provide a stable, mud -free walking
surface.
FIGURE 3 -4. Guidelines for Installing Sidewalks
[31
Mailboxes installed behind sidewalk at curb -style sidewalks in Edina.
I
Nom andWo Btmxh
Si 08 West 70 Beet
Edina. UN 55436MM
Fax 952.895.9686
Phone 9621150
n
MIN c � �.e S
1
Toe
Pau Poe
Pe 9 m Dom
M* CM:
O uryart #IEEer Row.w 0 Man@ ComnuM 0 Pia m Rebr 0 Mom Rae:Vlo
• Oononomm
IL r
t••f� T Lv r `fir
' b:°
-�-o.44's „tee �.�•�
C17
1 r I /b.n /. /r /. . A r0. f• 1 iil o.•r
Sheen
CORRECT METHOD OF MAIL BO� INSTALLATION
FOR CITY DELIVERY
HEIGHT: 45 - 48 INCHES ABOVE THE STREET LEVEL'
HAVE BOX EXTEND AS FAR IN FRONT OF SUPPORT POST AS POSSIBLE.
(THIS REDUCES RISK OF SNOW PLOW DAMAGE.) '
ADDRESS MUST BE ON SIDE OF BOX FROM WHICH CARRIER APPROACHES,
IN LETTERS ABOUT ON (1) INCH HIGH (OR ON FRON OF BOX IN CASES
WHERE BOXES ARE GROUPED.)
BOX MUST BE LOCATED SO THAT THE CARRIER CAN SERVE WITHOUT
LEAVING THE VEHICLE.
CUSTOMERS MUST KEEP THE APPROACH TO THEIR MAILBOXES CLEAR
OF OBSTRUCTIONS TO ALLOW SAFE ACCESS FOR DELIVERY. IF LISPS
EMPLOYEES ARE IMPEDED IN REACHING A MAIL RECEPTACLE, THE
POSTMASTER MAY WITH DRAW DELIVERY SERVICE.
ov
!; j
763 E. COOK
Page 1 I
i. UZI
Customer Mall Receptacles D041 &3 ,
_.... D000 Basle Information
D040 Delivery of Mail
W41 Customer Mail Receptacles
Summary D041 describes the standards for letterb me or other receptacles for the deposit or
reoelpt of mail. it also oontalns the standards for curbside mailboxes.
1.0 BASIC STANDARDS
Authorized
Except as excluded by 1.2, every letterbox or other receptacle Intended or used for
Depository
the receipt or delivery of mail on any city defvery route, rural delivery route,
1.1
highway contract route, or other mail route is designated an authorized depository
for mail within the meaning of 18 USC 1702,1705,1708. and 1725.
Exclusions
Door sots and nonlod®ble bins or troughs used with apartment house maMxms
1.2
are not letterboxes within the meaning of 18 USC 1725 and are not private mail
receptacles for the standards for mailable matter not bearing postage found in or
on private mail receptacles. The post or other support is not part of the receptacle.
Use for Mall
Except under 2.11, the receptacles described in 1.1 may be used only for matter
1.3
bearing postage. Other than as permitted by 2.10 or 2.11, no part of a mail
receptaoe may be used to deliver any matter not bearing postage, including items
or matter placed upon, supported by, attached 10, hung iron, or Inserted into a mail
receptacle. Any mallable matter not bearing postage and found as described
above Is subject to to same postage as would be paid If it were carded by mall.
Clear Approach
Customers must heap the approach to their mafflx s dear of obstructions to
1.4
allow safe access for delivery. If LISPS employees are impeded In reaching a mail
receptacle, the postnaster may withdraw depvery service.
2.0
CURBSIDE MAILBOXES
Manufacturer
Manufactunsm of all malft oores designed and made to be erected at the edge of a
SWIfIcatione
roadway or curbside of a street and to be served by a carrier from a vehicle on any
2.1
oily route. rural route, or highway contract route must obtain approval of their
products under LISPS Standard 7, MallbarM Cnp and Rural CurbsW Tb receive
these construction standards and drawinge or other infomma6on about the
marur(aohue of curbside mailboxes, write to LISPS Engineering (see G043 for
address).
Custont•Bullt
The local postmaster may approve a curbside maBbox constructed by a customer
Mailbox
who, for aesthetic or other reasons, does not want to use an approved
2.2
manufactured boot. The custom -built boot must generally meet the same standards
as approved manufactured boxes for flag, size, strength, and quality of
construction.
Address Identification
Every ourbside mailbox must bear the following address information:
2.3
a. A boor number, if used, inscribed in contrasting color in now letters and
numerals at least 1 Inch high on the side of the boot visible to the carriers
regular approach, or on the door it boozes are grouped.
b. A house number if street names and house numbers have been assigned by
local authorities, and the postmaster authorizes their use as a postal address.
If the base Is on a different street from the customers residence, the street
name and house number must be inscribed on the box.
DMM Issue 50 (6 -10413) D-9
9528359588 P . 04
®0041.2.4 ..
Customer Mall Race kiss
Owner's Name The mailbox may gear the owner's name.
2.4
Advertising Any advertising on a mailbox or its support is prohibited.
2.5
Mailbox Post The post or other support for a curbside mailbox must be neat and of adequate
2.6 strength and size. The post may not represent effigies or caricatures that tend to
disparage or ridicule any person. The box may be attached to a fixed or movable
arm.
Location Subject to state laws and regulations, a curbside mailbox must be placed to allow
sate and convenient delivery by carriers Without leaving their vehicles. The box
must be on the right hand side of the road in'the direction of travel of the carriers
on any new rural route or highway contract route, In all cases where traffic
conditions are dangerous for the carriers to drive to the left to reach the box, or
where their doing so would violate traffic laws and regulations.
More Than One If more than one Urrdy wishes to share a mail receptacle, the blowing standards
Family apply.
2.8 a, Route and Box Number Addressing. n rural and highway r9• 9 waY rontraot routes
authorized to use a route and box numbering system (e.g., RR 1 BCX 155),
UP to fire families may share a single mad receptacle and use a common
route and box designation. A written notice of agreement, signed by the
heads of the tiarnilles or Individuals who want th Join In the use of such box,
must be filed with the postrraster at the delivery office.
a CONSMion to Street Name and Number Addressing. When street name and
numbeft Systems are adopted, those addresses reflect distinct customer
boadons and sequences. Rural and highway oonkaot route customers who
are assigned different primary addresses (e.g.. 123 APPLE WAY vs. 136
APPLE WAY) should erect Individual mail receptacles in locations
recommended by their postmasters and begin using their new addresses,
Customers having different primary addresses who wish to oontinue sharing
a Common receptade must use the address of the receptaclVe owner and
the °care or address format:
JOHN DOE
C/O ROBERT SMITH
123 APPLE WAY
Customers having a Common primary address (e.g.. 800 MAIN ST) but
diffeerent secondary addresses (e.g., APT 101, APT 102, etc.) may continue
to share a common ncreptads if single -poh delivery Is authorized for the
Primary address. Secondary addresses should still be included in all
oorrespondenoe.
Locked Box A mailbox with a lock must have a slot that is large enough to accommodate the
2.9 customers normal dally mail volume. The USPS neither opens a locked boot nor
accepts a key for this purpose.
Delivery of Generally, curbside mailboxes are to be used for mail only. However, publishers of
Unstamped newspapers regularly marled as Periodicals may, on Sundays and national
Newspapers holidays only, place copies of the Sunday or holiday issues in the rural route and
2.10 highway oontraet route boxes of subscribers If those copies are removed from the
boxes before the nod scheduled day of mall delivery,
o-10
oMM mesas se (e -1e.0)
Typical Mail Delivery on curb -style sidewalk.
6
/A
0
REPORURE C OMMENDATION.
To:
MAYOR AND COUNCIL
Agenda Item
IV.C.
From:
GORDON L. HUGHES
Consent
El
CITY MANAGER
Information Only
❑
Date:
AUGUST 3, 2004
Mgr. Recommends
El
To HRA
To Council
Subject:
"FALL INTO THE ARTS.
❑
Motion
FESTIVAL' WINE.AND
®
Resolution
BEER TEMPORARY
❑
Ordinance
DISPENSARY
[1,
Discussion
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the establishment of a temporary dispensary for the sale of wine and
beer at the "Fall Into The Arts Festival' on Saturday, September 11 and Sunday,
September 12, 2004.
INFORMATION/]BACKGROUND:
n
The Edina Art Center has requested authorization to conduct wine and beer sales
in connection with the "Fall Into The Arts Festival' scheduled for September 11
and 12, 2004. Proceeds. from the sale of wine and beer at this event would benefit
the Art Center. Sales of wine and beer would occur on the outdoor patio area
located east of the Park Centrum building. Access to the area would be restricted
by fencing and a gate. Individuals over 21 . years of age would be identified by a
wristband, similar to that used by the 50'' & France Professional Association at its
Art Fair. The wine and the beer would be dispensed by full or part-time
employees of the Art Center. As with the 50th & France Art Fair, the "Fall Into
1'
REPORPRECOMMENDAT ION — "Fall Into The Arts Festival"
August 3, 2004
Page two
The Arts Festival" would hire an off -duty police officer to monitor activities in
the area where wine and beer are served. All other restrictions imposed on the 50d,
& France Arty Fair would be observed at the "Fall Into The Arts Festival ",
including restrictions on signage and hours of operation.
In that the City, by way of the Art Center would be the operator of this facility,
we think it would be appropriate to establish a temporary dispensary as opposed
to issuing a temporary intoxicating liquor license. In our view, this is in keeping
with recent interpretations by the State Liquor Control Board.
0
,, 2
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # IV. D.
From:, Wayne D. Houle, PE r— Consent ❑
City Engineer Information Only ❑ °
Date: August 3, 2004
Subject: Resolution supporting
partnership with Minnehaha
Creek Watershed District
and other public agencies
within district.
Recommendation:
Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
® To Council
Action ® Motion
6�I Resolution
Ordinance
Discussion
Adopt attached resolution supporting partnership with Minnehaha Creek Watershed
District (MCWD) to provide guidance and recommendations on policy development,
technical issues, and public involvement to create a common vision and' implementation
for the Minnehaha Creek Corridor.
Info /Background:
The MCWD is undertaking revisions to their 1997 Watershed Management Plan; an
updated plan is required every 10 years for watershed districts. As part of the
revisioning process the MCWD is inviting all district stakeholders to participate.
The process involves a three -year commitment to the Policy Board, Technical Advisory
Committee, and a Public Advisory Committee. The following is the member profile and
time commitment for each committee as it applies to the City:
Policy Board Technical Advisory Committee Public Advisory Committee
One City Council Member City Staff Two citizen representatives
Quarterly meetings Monthly meetings as needed Monthly as needed
City staff will be recommending representatives for the Public Advisory Committee at a
future Council Meeting.
Mike Wyatt a staff member with the MCWD will be at the meeting to give a brief
presentation and to answer any questions regarding this partnership.
RESOLUTION NO. 2004-69
Nr ( T _ y0
t� .3
v•
'�`�nrtroMTti
A RESOLUTION City of Edina
CREATING A MINNEHAHA CREEK PARTNERSHIP
WHEREAS, Minnehaha Creek is a highly valued stream flowing from Lake
Minnetonka to the Mississippi River; and
WHEREAS, the preservation and enhancement of the Minnehaha Creek Corridor
is a high- priority expressed in the comprehensive plans for each of the cities along the
Creek, and the Water Resources Management Plan of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed
District; and
WHEREAS, urbanization in the Minnehaha Creek Watershed has led to the
degradation of the stream's flow regime, habitat and water quality, but the Creek has
high potential for restoration; and
WHEREAS, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District completed in 2003 a
detailed Hydrologic /Hydraulic and Pollutant Loading Study, and a Minnehaha Creek
Stream Assessment; and
WHEREAS the MCWD will undertake revisions to its Watershed Management
Plan in partnership with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Feasibility Study to explore
the potential federal interest for Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration and Flood Damage
Reduction in the Minnehaha Creek Corridor;
WHEREAS, the City of Edina desires to partner with the other communities
along the Creek to seek protection and restoration of the Minnehaha Creek Corridor;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Edina supports the
formation of a partnership to provide guidance and recommendations on policy
development, technical issues, and public involvement to create a common vision and
implementation plan for the Minnehaha Creek Corridor, to be organized as follows:
1. Partnership Comyosition
The partnership will comprise the following partners:
• City of Minnetonka;
• City of Hopkins;
• City of St. Louis Park;
• City of Edina;
• City of Minneapolis;
• Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board;
City Hall 1 952- 927 -8861
4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390
EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379
• Hennepin County; and
• Minnehaha Creek Watershed District
2. Policy Board
a. The partnership Policy Board will comprise a member of the governing body
of each of the partner organizations.
b. The Policy Board will generally meet quarterly as needed and pursuant to an
established project schedule and work plan.
3. Technical Advisory Committee
a. The Technical Advisory Committee will provide technical review and
recommendations to the partnership and will comprise a staff representative
from each of the partner organizations, and a representative from the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Minnesota
Department of Natural Resources, Minnesota Department of Health and such
other governmental agencies having a technical interest and expertise to offer
for the benefit of the Minnehaha Creek Corridor.
b. The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District technical representative will serve
as the Chair of the Technical Advisory Committee.
c. The Technical Advisory Committee will generally meet monthly as needed
pursuant to the established project work schedule and work plan.
4. Public Advisory Committee
a. The Public Advisory Committee will comprise two citizen representatives
designated by each partner organization, and up to seven other
representatives of stakeholder organizations named by the Minnehaha Creek
Watershed District to represent conservation, property owner, development,
and recreational interests in the Minnehaha Creek Watershed appointed by
the Minnehaha Creek Watershed through an open application process.
b. The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District will designate one of its Board
Members to serve as Chair to the Public Advisory Committee.
c. The Public Advisory Committee will generally meet monthly as needed
pursuant to the established project schedule and work plan.
5. Legal Authority
It is understood that the decisions and activities of the partnership are advisory
only, and will not have any binding legal authority on any of the partnership's
members. The parties to the partnership expect that recommendations
developed and approved by the partnership will be duly considered and acted
upon by the governing body of the respective the partnership members.
6. Term
The partnership will meet and work for an initial period of three (3) years,
concluding on or before March 1, 2007, subject to a determination to renew the
work of the partnership by each of its partner organizations.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Mayor
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby
certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City
Council at its Regular Meeting of August 3, 2004, and as recorded in the Minutes of said
Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of
3
,20 .
City Clerk
1- ..0 {►
ti
92372
60731
5821.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS'
50TH ST OCCUPANCY
24.75
R55CKREG LOG20000
92373
60730
5841.6180
CITY OF EDINA
YORK OCCUPANCY
24.75
CHEMICAL CERTIFICATION
92374
60729
5861.6180
Council Check Register,
VERNON OCCUPANCY
335.47
CHEMICAL CERTIFICATION
92499
60600
5630.6230
7/22/2004
-7/22/2004
92603
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
261680
7/2212004
100616 ACTION MAILING SERVICES INC.
7122/2004
103367 ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO
362.69
MAIL PROCESS
92371
99917
5910.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
SYSINVO3103
1120.6406
362.69
159.75
261681
7/22/2004
102626 AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES
712212004
102172 APPERTS FOODSERVICE
636.38
CEMENT
92197
4073888
1314.6520
CONCRETE
226982
5421.5510
633.41
CEMENT
92198
4073467
1314.6520
CONCRETE
211.88
CEMENT
92427
4075215
5932.6520
CONCRETE
591.18
CEMENT
92428
4075214
1314.6520
CONCRETE
92225
2210.6103
2,072.85
222.07
261682
7/22/2004
111228 ALDEN POOL & MUNICIPAL SUPPLY
712212004
103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS
686.39
PUMP REPAIR PARTS
92199
401184
5915.6530
REPAIR PARTS
6013 - 403927
7411.6406
1,222.17
CHEMICAL EJECTOR
92429
401081
05413.1705.31
MATERIALS /SUPPLIES
1,908.56
-
261683
712212004
100675 ALL SAFE FIRE & SECURITY
7/21/2004 10:35:15
Page - 1
Business Unit
GENERAL (BILLING)
STREET RENOVATION
STREET RENOVATION
GENERAL STORM SEWER
STREET RENOVATION
WATER TREATMENT
WATER TREATMENT PLANT #2
20.85
CHEMICAL CERTIFICATION
92372
60731
5821.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS'
50TH ST OCCUPANCY
24.75
CHEMICAL CERTIFICATION
92373
60730
5841.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
YORK OCCUPANCY
24.75
CHEMICAL CERTIFICATION
92374
60729
5861.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
VERNON OCCUPANCY
335.47
CHEMICAL CERTIFICATION
92499
60600
5630.6230
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT
CENTENNIAL LAKES
ENGINEERING GENERAL
PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL
ADMINISTRATION
GRILL
COMMUNICATIONS
PSTF OCCUPANCY
405.82
261684
7/2212004
116726 ALLISON, SHARON
7.34
BATTERIES
92603
071604
1260.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
100.00
NOTARY COMMISSION FEE
92603
071604
1240.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
107.34
261686
7122/2004
103367 ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO
159.75
VIDEO TAPES
92297
SYSINVO3103
1120.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
159.75
261686
712212004
102172 APPERTS FOODSERVICE
767.98
FOOD
92500
226982
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
767.98
261687
712212004
101276 APRES
222.07
RENTAL SUPPLIES
92200
92225
2210.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
222.07
261688
712212004
103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS
69.70
COFFEE
92366
6013 - 403927
7411.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ENGINEERING GENERAL
PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL
ADMINISTRATION
GRILL
COMMUNICATIONS
PSTF OCCUPANCY
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation
Council Check Register
69.70
Page - 2
261689
712212004
- 7/22/2004
100929 ARCTIC GLACIER INC.
PO # Doc No
27.75
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
21.00
387419109
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
105.50
92247
387419208
5862.5515
107.50
VERNON SELLING
92339
385419206
261.75
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
261690
7122/2004
387419413
114563 ARDIE & FRIENDS
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
30.03
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
30.03
92501
261691
712212004
COST OF GOODS SOLD
101964 AUGIE'S INC.
92391
071104
59.40
FOOD
ART CENTER REVENUES
92365
59.40
1470.4329
261692
7122/2004
92201
112862 AXELSON, MARY
1325.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
34.29
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
17934
1647.6406
34.29
PATHS & HARD SURFACE
261693
7122/2004
1628.4392.09
116701 AZAR, MIGUEL
SENIOR CITIZENS
92604
662.00
AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
SPECIAL ACTIVITIES
662.00
4895800
261694
7/2212004
VERNON SELLING
100642 BANNERS TO GO
38648400
5862.5515
364.23
SIGNS
92250
29980600
38.34
SIGNS
VERNON SELLING
402.57
261695
712212004
116724 BARNES, DOROTHY
19.00
PROGRAM REFUND
19.00
261696
712212004
102346 BEARCOM
115.02
PARADE SUPPLIES
115.02
261697
712212004
101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION
249.65
88.47
345.00
.CITY OF EDINA
7/21/2004 10:35:15
Council Check Register
Page - 2
7/22/2004
- 7/22/2004
PO # Doc No
Inv No .
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
92246
387419109
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
92247
387419208
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
92339
385419206
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
92451
387419413
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
92390
071104
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
92501
4490
5430.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
92391
071104
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
92365
071404
1470.4329
AMBULANCE FEES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
92201
17876
1325.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
STREET NAME SIGNS
92298
17934
1647.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PATHS & HARD SURFACE
92583
071504
1628.4392.09
SENIOR SPECIAL EVENTS
SENIOR CITIZENS
92604
2665787
1627.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
SPECIAL ACTIVITIES
92248
4895800
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
92249
38648400
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX _
VERNON SELLING
92250
29980600
- 862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
CITY OF EDINA
7121/2004 10:35:15
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 3
7/22/2004
- 7/22/2004
Check # Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
285.00
92251
30040600
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
14.74
92340
38661000
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
322.50
92341
30077800
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
567.50
92342
30082700
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
1,942.00
92452
30077700
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
67.56
92453
38662500
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
789.00
92454
30040500
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
4,671.42
261698 712212004
100661 BENN, BRADLEY
184.60
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
92393
071104
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
184.60
261699 712212004
116714 BERGERSON, RON
75.00
AWARD OF EXCELLENCE
92555
071304
5120.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP
75.00
261700 7/2212004
100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS
23.42
OFFICE SUPPLIES
92567
3085160
1550.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
40.43
OFFICE SUPPLIES
92567
3085160
1495.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
INSPECTIONS
45.93
OFFICE SUPPLIES
92567
3085160
1160.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
FINANCE
173.63
OFFICE SUPPLIES
92567
3085160
1120.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ADMINISTRATION
91.89
OFFICE SUPPLIES
92568
3074130
1120.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ADMINISTRATION
530.68
LAMINATOR, HEADSET
92584
3061230
1400.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES _
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
48.94
RECORDER
92638
3076620
1400.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
954.92
261701 712212004
116715 BIDDINGTON, TREENA
40.00
AWARD OF MERIT
92556
071304
5120.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP
40.00
261702 712212004
101676 BIFFS INC
859.23
RESTROOM RENTAL
92299
W224764
1642.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
FIELD MAINTENANCE
166.68
RESTROOM RENTAL
92300
VM5836
1642.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
FIELD MAINTENANCE
71.26
RESTROOM RENTAL
92301
W225839
1642.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
FIELD MAINTENANCE
242.91
RESTROOM RENTAL
92302
W225840
1642.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
FIELD MAINTENANCE
52.77
RESTROOM RENTAL
92303
W225841
1642.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
FIELD MAINTENANCE
124.82
RESTROOM RENTAL
92569
W225837
5422.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
62.41
RESTROOM RENTAL
92570
M25838
5430.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
1,580.08
261703 712212004
100663 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS
R55CKREG LOG20000
110.00
PUMP HOLDING TANK
CITY OF EDINA
6375
1646.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
Council Check Register
7/22/2004
— 7/22/2004
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
1,990.63
AMBULANCE SUPPLIES
146.91
ASPHALT
92202
93446
1301.6518
BLACKTOP
1,990.63
146.91
261704
7/22/2004
100663 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS
8,022.10
PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 5
92361
071404
10086.1705.30
CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
COMMUNICATIONS
8,022.10
127.37
261706
712212004
100664 BJORK STONE INC.
712212004
100873 BROCKWAY, MAUREEN
1,462.50
STONE WALL REPAIR
92430
071204
1344.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
92394
071104
1,462.50
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
74.75
261706
7/22/2004
116720 BJORNNES, CONNIE
261712
7/22/2004
116716 BROWN, DAVID M
20.00
PROGRAM REFUND
92563
071504
1600.4390.01
PLAYGROUND
75.00
20.00
92557
071304
5120.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP
261707
7/2212004
75.00
103866 BLALOCK, KAREN
261713
34.45
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
92392
071104
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
34.45
37.28
BATTERIES
92431
2469
261708
712212004
SPECIAL ACTIVITIES
100623 BOSS PUMPING
37.28
7/21/2004 10:35:15
Page- 4
Business Unit
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
CITY HALL SIDEWALK
RETAINING WALL MAINTENANCE
PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
ART CENTER REVENUES
110.00
PUMP HOLDING TANK
92304
6375
1646.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
110.00
261709
7122/2004
106367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC
1,990.63
AMBULANCE SUPPLIES
92639
943189
1470.6510
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
1,990.63
261710
7122/2004
103239 BRIN NORTHWESTERN GLASS CO.
127.37
ACRYLIC
92203
601064
2210.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
COMMUNICATIONS
127.37
261711
712212004
100873 BROCKWAY, MAUREEN
74.75
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
92394
071104
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
74.75
261712
7/22/2004
116716 BROWN, DAVID M
75.00
AWARD OF EXCELLENCE
92557
071304
5120.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP
75.00
261713
7122/2004
116711 BY APPOINTMENT ONLY
37.28
BATTERIES
92431
2469
1627.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
SPECIAL ACTIVITIES
37.28
CITY OF EDINA
7121/2004 10:35:15
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 5
7/22/2004
- 7/22/2004
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
261714
7122/2004
105315 CALTON, BOB
37.05
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
92395
071104
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
37.05
261715
7/2212004
106466 CARROT -TOP INDUSTRIES INC.
126.50
US FLAGS
92305
349052
1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
126.50
261716
7122/2004
112811 CASTREJON INC.
9,160.00
DRAIN TILE
92571
1720
04294.1705.30
CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS
OLINGER BLVD - DRAIN TILE
9,160.00
261717
712212004
100681 CATCO
50.88
HOSE ENDS, FITTINGS
92640
32 -22339
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
16.04
FITTINGS
92641
1 -77722
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN'
38.55.
FITTINGS
92642
3 -52311
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
49.08
FITTINGS
92643
3 -52265
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
154.55
261718
712212004
102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC.
38.13
CD -RW DRIVE
92204
NE41533
1495.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
INSPECTIONS
519.72
DIGITAL CAMERA
92204
NE41533
1260.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ENGINEERING GENERAL
519.72
DIGITAL CAMERA
92204
NE41533
1627.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
SPECIAL ACTIVITIES
519.72
DIGITAL CAMERA
92204
NE41533
1628.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
SENIOR CITIZENS
692.53
DIGITAL CAMERA
92204
NE41533
1190.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ASSESSING
2,289.82
261719
712212004
116700 CENTRAL COMMUNITY CENTER
60.00
PARTIAL REFUND
92306
071304.
5301.4541
GENERAL ADMISSIONS
AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES
60.00
261720
7122/2004
104363 CHOICEPOINT INC.
80.00
CREDIT CHECKS
92585
AB0000972750
1400.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
80.00
261721
712212004
100684 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON
5,725.77
2ND QTR LAB SERVICES
92432
071304
5913.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
DISTRIBUTION
5,725.77
261722
712212004
100687 CITY OF RICHFIELD
492.27
ELECTRIC BILLING
92605
2094
5932.6185
LIGHT & POWER
GENERAL STORM SEWER
R55CKREG LOG20000
OPEN HOUSE POSTCARDS
92502
9137
CITY OF EDINA
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
COMMUNICATIONS
2,284.00
MAGNA -SEAL POSTCARD DESIGN
92503
9140
Council Check Register
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
COMMUNICATIONS
1,573.63
BROCHURE DESIGN
92504
9138
7/22/2004
- 7/22/2004
COMMUNICATIONS
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
OPEN HOUSE AD DESIGN
92506
492.27
2210.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
COMMUNICATIONS
13,047.00
ABOUT TOWN- SPRING DESIGN
261723
7/22/2004
2210.6123
100688 CITYWIDE WINDOW SERVICE INC
COMMUNICATIONS
7,719.50
ABOUT BUSINESS- SPRING DESIGN
92508
9034
2210.6123
14.38
WINDOW CLEANING
92205
336737
5861.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
16.62
WINDOW CLEANING
92205
336737
5821.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
27.04
WINDOW CLEANING
92205
336737
5841.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
102.88
58.04
261724
712212004
106316 CLARK, PENNY
293.94
PLANTS
92206
26.00
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
92396
071104
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
26.00
261730 712212004
100701 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO.
261726
7/22/2004
102122 CLINNET SOLUTIONS LLC
33.50
BELTS
92509
127327
5630.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
38.00
DRUG TESTING
92307
814863
1550.6121
ADVERTISING PERSONNEL
76.00
DRUG TESTING
92644
815115
1550.6121
ADVERTISING PERSONNEL
114.00
261726
7/22/2004
116709 CLISE, WENDY
110.00
PROGRAM REFUND
92433
071404
1600.4390.04
NATURE CAMP
110.00
261727
7/22/2004
101346 COLOURS
7/21/2004 10:35:15
Page- 6
Business Unit
VERNON OCCUPANCY
50TH ST OCCUPANCY
YORK OCCUPANCY
ART CENTER REVENUES
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
1,431.00
OPEN HOUSE POSTCARDS
92502
9137
2210.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
COMMUNICATIONS
2,284.00
MAGNA -SEAL POSTCARD DESIGN
92503
9140
2210.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
COMMUNICATIONS
1,573.63
BROCHURE DESIGN
92504
9138
2210.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
COMMUNICATIONS
2,056.00
BROCHURE DESIGN
92505
9143
2210.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
COMMUNICATIONS
556.00
OPEN HOUSE AD DESIGN
92506
9158
2210.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
COMMUNICATIONS
13,047.00
ABOUT TOWN- SPRING DESIGN
92507
9085
2210.6123
MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE
COMMUNICATIONS
7,719.50
ABOUT BUSINESS- SPRING DESIGN
92508
9034
2210.6123
MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE
COMMUNICATIONS
28,667.13
261728 712212004
101915 COUNTRY FLAGS
102.88
FLAGS
92645
9882
1470.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
102.88
261729 7/2212004
112790 CROSS NURSERIES INC.
293.94
PLANTS
92206
017175
5630.6620
TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS
CENTENNIAL LAKES
293.94
261730 712212004
100701 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO.
33.50
BELTS
92509
127327
5630.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTENNIAL LAKES
33.50
7/21/2004 10:35:15
Page- 7
Business Unit
GRILL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
ART CENTER REVENUES
382.50
MERCHANDISE
92510
787864
CITY OF EDINA
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
R55CKREG LOG20000
382.50
261735 7/2212004
Council Check Register
7/22/2004 -7 /22/2004
TREE SERVICE
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No Account No
Subledger Account Description
261731
7/22/2004
116723 CUSTOM WATERWORKS
261736 712212004
102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING
1,512.00
BOTTLED WATER
92572
29047 5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
58.80
1,512.00
92252
270791
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
261732
7122/2004
65.80
101681 DAKOTA COUNTY TECHNICAL COLLEG
92253
271670
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
380.00
DRIVING COURSES
92586
070204 1400.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
271669
5862.5514
380.00
VERNON SELLING
46.60
261733
712212004
5842.5515
103143 DAKOTA MAE DESIGNS
YORK SELLING
1,592.58
92344
81.90
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
92397
071104 5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
839.00
81.90
272112
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
261734
712212004
102121 DATREK PROFESSIONAL BAGS INC
272521
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
7/21/2004 10:35:15
Page- 7
Business Unit
GRILL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
ART CENTER REVENUES
382.50
MERCHANDISE
92510
787864
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
382.50
261735 7/2212004
116713 DAVEY TREE EXPERT CO., THE
426.00
TREE SERVICE
92511
96500988
5630.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CENTENNIAL LAKES
426.00
261736 712212004
102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING
58.80
92252
270791
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
65.80
92253
271670
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
985.60
92254
271669
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
46.60
92343
272520
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
1,592.58
92344
272519
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
839.00
92345
272112
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
1,088.80
92346
272521
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
19,80
92347
272522
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
4,696.98
261737 7/2212004
114566 DEIRDRE & CO.
37.05
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
92398
071104
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
37.05
261738 7/2212004
100720 DENNYS 6TH AVE. BAKERY
68.09
BAKERY
92512
171971
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
46.61
BAKERY
92513
171970
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
27.84
BAKERY
92514
172032
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
37.94
BAKERY
92515
172107
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
136.09
BAKERY
92516
172138
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
7121/2004 10:35:15
Council Check Register
Page - 8
7/22/2004
- 7/2212004
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
316.57
261739
712212004
116717 DEWITT DUFFY, BARBARA
40.00
AWARD OF MERIT
92558
071304
5120.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP
40.00
261740
712212004
102831 DEX MEDIA EAST LLC
22.40
92646
021373145000
5420.6188
TELEPHONE
CLUB HOUSE
90.30
92646
021373145000
5110.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
122.60
92646
021373145000
5511.6188
TELEPHONE
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
554.00
92646
021373145000
5610.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
ED ADMINISTRATION
789.30
261741
7/2212004
108648 DOAN, SIIRI
119.60
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
92399
071104
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
119.60
261742
712212004
114271 DOBOSZENSKI & SONS INC.
9,000.00
FINAL PAYMENT
92362
071404
4400.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
CITY HALL/POLICE BUILDING
9,000.00
261743
7/22/2004
101691 DON BETZEN GOLF SUPPLY CO.
359.50
BAGS
92517
18382
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
359.50
261744
7/2212004
100731 DPC INDUSTRIES
320.11
CHLORINE
92207
82701025 -04
5311.6545
CHEMICALS
POOL OPERATION
3,589.32
CHEMICALS
92434
82701002 -04
5915.6586
WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES
WATER TREATMENT
3,909.43
261746
712212004
104868 DUNN, MATT
150.00
FAMILY JAMBOREE MAGICAN
92647
071904
1624.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PLAYGROUND & THEATER
150.00
261746
7/22/2004
100739 EAGLE WINE
670.20
92255
916269
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
182.00
92256
916749
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
203.65
92348
918296
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
1,148.97
92455
918297
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
4.25
92456
918048
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
2,209.07
CITY OF EDINA
nnicuuv w:�a: ��
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 9
7/22/2004
—7/22/2004
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor ! Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
261747
7/22/2004
100741 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
2,794.80
92257
322529
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
1,638.10
92457
322635
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
326.00
92518
13014
5421.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
GRILL
4,284.70
92624
322646
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
9,043.60
261748
7122/2004
100742 ECOLAB PEST ELIMINATION DIVISI
141.65
PEST CONTROL
92519
3586276
5630.6230
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT
CENTENNIAL LAKES
141.65
261749
7/22/2004
116448 EGAN OIL COMPANY
13,017.62
GAS
92208
82542
1553.6581
GASOLINE
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
13,017.62
261750
712212004
116698 EGRESS WINDOW GUY INC.
77.80
PERMIT REFUND
92209
ED026784
1495.4111
BUILDING PERMITS
INSPECTIONS
77.80
261751
7/22/2004
104331 EILERS, JOYCE
129.35
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
92400
071104
5101.4413
ARTWORK SOLD -
ART CENTER REVENUES
129.35
261752
7/22/2004
105294 EKLUND MULCH SALES
_
1,202.40
RED MULCH
92308
00536
1644.6541
PLANTINGS & TREES
TREES & MAINTENANCE
1,202.40
261763
7/22/2004
106339 ENRGI
176.25
WEBSITE DEVELOPMENT
92520
1711
2210.6124
WEB DEVELOPMENT
COMMUNICATIONS
176.25
261764
712212004
100752 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC.
2,028.83
STORM SEWER CASTING
92210
GG2857
5932.6536
CASTINGS
GENERAL STORM SEWER
2,216.27
CASTING & RINGS
92309
GG2921
5932.6536
CASTINGS
GENERAL STORM SEWER
266.25
ADJUSTING RINGS
92435
GG3093
5932.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL STORM SEWER
4,511.35
261756
7/2212004
100297 FAST FOTO & DIGITAL
41.81
PHOTO FINISHING
92648
T2- 185093
1470.6408
PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
41.81
261766
7122/2004
100755 FAST FRAME
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
7/21/2004 10:35:15
Council Check Register
Page - 10
7/22/2004
- 7/22/2004
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
248.94
FRAME
92436
17711655
5310.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
POOL ADMINISTRATION
248.94
261767
712212004
100766 FEDERAL EXPRESS
27.76
COURIER
92437
1- 878 -76328
1120.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
27.76
261768
712212004
116702 FELDMANN, JOHN
126.46
AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT
92367
071404
1470.4329
AMBULANCE FEES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
126.46
261769
712212004
112238 FERGESEN, NANCY
20.00
PROGRAM REFUND
92310
071204
1600.4390.01
PLAYGROUND
PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
20.00
261760
7/2212004
116492 FINANCE AND COMMERCE
69.00
REAL ESTATE THURSDAY
92649
071904
1190.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
ASSESSING
69.00
261761
712212004
114661 FIRESIDE HEARTH & HOME
66.80
PERMIT REFUND
92211
ED026713
1495.4110
HEATING & VENTING LICENSE
INSPECTIONS
66.80
261762
7/2212004
104205 FLICKER, KEVIN
48.75
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
92401
071104
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
48.75
261763
7/22/2004
105824 FLYING CLOUD ANIMAL HOSPITAL
55.17
K9 EXAM
92587
263508
1438.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
K -9 UNIT
55.17
261764
712212004
101476 FOOTJOY
36.52
SHOES
92521
5935833
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO.SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
36.52
261765
712212004
100760 FOWLER ELECTRIC
96.30
VOLTAGE REGULATORS
92650
60531900
5422.6530
REPAIR PARTS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
114.07
OIL FILTERS
92651
60563000
5422.6530
REPAIR PARTS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
210.37
261766
712212004
106608 GEMPLER'S INC.
31.90
UNIFORM
92311
1004959459
'546.6201
LAUNDRY
BUILDING MAINTENM "
R55CKREG LOG20000
7/2212004
CITY OF EDINA
16.67
Council Check Register.
92312
071304
5861.6406
49.93
7/22/2004.
—7/22/2004
071304
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
261773,
712212004
31.90
106407 GRAY, CAROL
261767
712212004
CURATOR
114801 GLADSTONE CONSTRUCTION INC.
071304
5120.6103
600.00
151,763.67
PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 6
92363
071404
05413.1705.30
CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS
100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC.
151,763.67
590.17
HAND DRYER
261768
7/2212004
5630.6530
100779 GOPHER CASH REGISTER
590.17
300.90
PRINTER REPAIR
92522
18832
5424.6530
REPAIR PARTS
77.21
REGISTER TAPE
92523
23992
5424.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
378.11
261769
712212004
116727 GOPHER STAGE LIGHTING
7,391.33
LIGHTING CONTROLS
92606
29463
5620.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
7,391.33
261770
7/22/2004
101103 GRAINGER
128.67
BATTERIES
92607
495 - 393733 -3
7411.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
128.67
261771
712212004
102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC
7/21/2004 10:35:15
Page - 11
Business Unit
WATER TREATMENT PLANT #2
RANGE
RANGE
EDINBOROUGH PARK
PSTF OCCUPANCY
379.00 92458 65493 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
370.00- 92459 65321 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
1.748.00 92625 65494 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
261772
7/2212004
101618 GRAUSAM, STEVE
16.67
WATER DRAIN & CLAMP
92312
071304
5861.6406
49.93
TRASH BAGS, CLEANERS
92312
071304
5840.6406
66.80
261773,
712212004
106407 GRAY, CAROL
600.00
CURATOR
92554
071304
5120.6103
600.00
261774
7/2212004
100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC.
590.17
HAND DRYER
92524
902557129
5630.6530
590.17
261776
7/2212004
102125 GREG LESSMAN SALES
124.30
TOWELS ,TEES
92525
28511
5440.5511
124.30
GENERALSUPPLIES VERNON OCCUPANCY
GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP
REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
7/21/2004 10:35:15
Council Check Register
Page - 12
7122/2004
-7/22/2004
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor/ Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
261776
712212004
100762 GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
212.05
92349
918078
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
2,596.90
92350
918080
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
127.80
92460
918083
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
1,838.80
92461
912310
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
3.40
92462
917846
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
1,493.05
92463
918032
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
2,726.79
92464
918076
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
.85
92465
917848
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
8,999.64
261777
7/2212004
100166 GRITTON, KAY
107.90
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
92402
071104
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
107.90
261778
712212004
102680 GUEST SERVICES INC
207.00
NFA MEAL TICKET
92652
190908
1470.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
207.00
261779
712212004
102869 GUEST, LISA
94.90
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
92403
071104
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
94.90
261780
7/2212004.
102320 HAMCO DATA PRODUCTS
107.90
REGISTER PAPER
92440
236327
5862.6512
PAPER SUPPLIES
VERNON SELLING
107.90
261781
7/22/2004
116710 HAMMES, TIM
78.00
CLASS REFUND
92438
062304
5101.4607
CLASS REGISTRATION
ART CENTER REVENUES
78.00
261782
7/22/2004
104723 HANSEN, WILLIAM C. _
1,165.00
SIDEWALK PAVER REPAIRS
92313
071204
4090.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
STREET REVOLVING
1,165.00
261783
7/22/2004
114566 HARTKE, BRENDA
27.30
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
92404
071104
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
27.30
261784
712212004
100797 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT
329.36
POOL CHEMICALS
92526
631404
5311.6545
CHEMICALS
POOL OPERATION
329.36
CITY OF EDINA
7/21/2004 10:35:15
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 13
7/22/2004
—7/22/2004
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
261786
712212004
102190 HAYNES, PATRICIA
28.93
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
92405
071104
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
28.93
261786
7/2212004
101209 HEIMARK FOODS
200.64
MEAT PATTIES
92527
017707
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
200.64
261787
7122/2004
101216 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFI
565.36
BOOKING FEE - JUNE 04
92588
228
1195.6170
COURT CHARGES
LEGAL SERVICES
565.36
261788
712212004
100806 HIRSHFIELD'S
20.22
PAINT
92528
003914829
5420.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CLUB HOUSE
20.22
261789
712212004
100806 HOBART CORP
199.24
DISHWASHER REPAIR
92573
20853723
5421.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
GRILL
199.24
261790
7/22/2004
104376 HOHENSTEINS INC.
593.95
92258
334638
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
455.00
92351
335606
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD SEER
50TH ST SELLING
1,048.95
261791
712212004
112628 ICEE COMPANY, THE
1,303.80
CONCESSION PRODUCT
92314
049878
5320.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
POOL CONCESSIONS
1,303.80
261792
712212004
102640 IPMA
270.00
FIREFIGHTER EXAMS
92653
10043282
1470.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
270.00
261793
712212004
101403 J -CRAFT
58.73
WELDMENT
92315
34801
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
58.73
261794
7/22/2004
113483 J.S. CATES CONSTRUCTION
11,064.00
CONTRACT PAYMENT
92608
08 -73 -427
5453.1705
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
MAINTENANCE BUILDING
11,064.00
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
7/22/2004 -7/2212004
Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No
261795 712212004 101612 JACK RICHESON & CO. INC.
102.99 POTTERY KITS 92380 0273962 -IN 5120.5510
102.99
261796
712212004
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
106163 JACKSON LANDSCAPE SUPPLY INC.
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
1,810.50
HYDROSEEDING
92316
0131891
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
1,810.50
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
261797
7122/2004
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
100830 JERRY'S PRINTING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
9.59
HAND STAMP
92529
29827
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
9.59
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
261798
712212004
102146 JESSEN PRESS
1,470.10
WATER REPORT
92439
49590
15,512.13
ABOUT TOWN
92439
49590
16,982.23
261799
7/2212004
116416 JM KILEY & SONS TRUCKING
190.10
TRUCKING CHARGE
92212
2637
190.10
261800
7122/2004
100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO.
120.62
92259
1748452
104.50
92260
1745378
794.30
92261
1748445
831.77
92262
1748446
133.85
92263
1749565
1,537.49
92264
1748438
919.84
92265
1748439
166.40-
92266
254658
59.30
92466
1752164
764.13
92467
1752151
95.45
92468
1752152
677.64
92469
1752153
101.18
92470
1752154
4.88-
92471
255052
4,741.04
92626
1752156
4,649.39
92627
1752157
204.60
92628
1752155
156.49
92629
1752158
47.90
92630
1752159
15,768.21
1643.6103
5430.6513
5913.6575
2210.6123
1301.6518
5862.5513
5862.5514
5862.5513
5862.5513
5822.5512
5842.5513
5842.5513
5842.5513
5862.5513
5822.5512
5822.5515
5822.5513
5822.5513
5862.5512
5842.5513
5842.5512
5842.5512
5842.5515
5842.5515
Subledger Account Description
COST OF GOODS SOLD
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
7/21/2004 10:35:15
Page - 14
Business Unit
ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP
GENERAL TURF CARE
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
PRINTING DISTRIBUTION
MAGAZINEINEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS
BLACKTOP
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
CITY OF EDINA
7/21/2004 10:35:15
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register.
Page - 15
7/22/2004
-7/2212004
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
261801
712212004
103664 JOHNSON, DENISE
45.50
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
92406
071104
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
45.50
261802
712212004
101414 KAR PRODUCTS
259.27
CLEANERS
92213
3911219001
5422.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
259.27
261803
7122/2004
116707 KAUL, SHEFALI
16.25
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
92425
071104
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
16.25
261804
712212004
116295 KING PAR CORPORATION
832.00
GOLF CLUBS
92530
2233312
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
4.59
FREIGHT
92531
2232886
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
171.39
GOLF CLUBS
92532
2236669
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
171.27
GOLF CLUBS
92533
2236822
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
671.23
GOLF CLUBS
92534
2231452
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
1,850.48
261806
7/22/2004
102101 KINKO'S
57.49
SIGNS
92574
062200049592
5410.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
57.49
261806
7122/2004
101186 KNUTSON, KAREN
61.10
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
92407
071104
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
61.10
261807
712212004
101340 KOCHENASH, RICK
75.00
AWARD OF EXCELLENCE
92559
071304
5120.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP
75.00
261808
7122/2004
106887 KOESSLER, JOE
139.00
FEE FOR JULY 04
92654
070104
1628.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
SENIOR CITIZENS
139.00
261809
712212004
114669 KOLODJI, JAN M
31.20
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
92408
071104
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
31.20
261810
7/2212004
114344 KRAEMER, KARIN
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
7/21/2004 10:35:15
Council Check Register
Page - 16
7/22/2004
— 7/22/2004
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No .
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
72.80
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
92409
071104
5101.4413
ARTWORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
72.80
261811
712212004
100846 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO
1,687.10
92267
406053
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
38.00
92268
406052
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
1,725.10
261812
712212004
100847 KUNDE CO INC
522.34
OAKWILT PROGRAM
92441
13162
1644.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
TREES & MAINTENANCE
522.34
261813
712212004
105028 LAEDTKE, ELISE
40.00
FIELD TRIP REFUND
92442
071404
1600.4390.01
PLAYGROUND
PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
40.00
261814
7/2212004
106201 LAKE WEED HARVESTING
2,502.50
WEED REMOVAL
92655
258
4086.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AQUATIC WEEDS
2,502.50
261815
7/22/2004
115862 LANO EQUIPMENT INC.
53.63
FILTERS
92575
79155
5630.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTENNIAL LAKES
53.63
261816
7/22/2004
116722 LANZO, BARBARA
682.00
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
92565
071104
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
682.00
261817
7122/2004
116721 LANZO, LEE ANN
260.00
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
92566
071104
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
260.00
261818
712212004
102111 LASER TECHNOLOGY INC.
265.68
LASER MAINTENANCE
92589
31526RI
1400.6215
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
265.68
261819
7122/2004
100446 LATHAM, MEGAN
47.01
PARADE SUPPLIES
92443
071404
1627.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
SPECIAL ACTIVITIES
47.01
261820
712212004
102375 LATHAM, PATTY L.
64.42
PARADE SUPPLIES
92444
071404
1627.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
SPECIAL ACTIVITIES
7/21/2004 10:35:15
Page- 17
Business Unit
DISTRIBUTION
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE
SENIOR CITIZENS
TRAINING
COMMUNICATIONS
50.60
92576
23974/23980
1554.6160
DATA PROCESSING
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
90.50
92576
23974/23980
5910.6160
DATA PROCESSING
CITY OF EDINA
201.60
R55CKREG LOG20000
92576
23974/23980
1400.6160
DATA PROCESSING
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
700.00
92576
23974/23980
1550.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
Council Check Register .
977.03
92576
23974/23980
1160.6160
DATA PROCESSING
7/22/2004
- 7/22/2004
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
23974/23980
1551.6180
64.42
CITY HALL GENERAL
6,381.70
92576
23974/23980
261821
712212004
CITY HALUPOLICE BUILDING
100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC.
119.28
TRU -TORQS
92609
2188876
5913.6406
GENERAL- SUPPLIES
66.95
119.28
92590
071604
1400.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
261822
712212004
100854 LEITNER COMPANY
261827 712212004
101453 LUTZ, RICHARD M.
1,645.52
SAND, DIRT
92214
070104
5422.6517
SAND GRAVEL & ROCK
92591
071604
31172.82
SAND, DIRT
92214
070104
5422.6543
SOD & BLACK DIRT
453.26
SOIL
92215
JUL 1
5431.6543
SOD & BLACK DIRT
5,271.60
548.94
CANDY
92577
162907
5320.5510
261823
7/22/2004
116575 LIFE LINE INC.
168.00
CPR TRAINING
92216
LL -1069
1628.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
616.00
CPR TRAINING
92216
LL -1069
1281.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
784.00
261824
7122/2004
100856 LINHOFF PHOTO
138.60
PHOTO PROCESSING
92317
68718
2210.6408
PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
138.60
261825
712212004
100858 LOGIS
7/21/2004 10:35:15
Page- 17
Business Unit
DISTRIBUTION
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE
SENIOR CITIZENS
TRAINING
COMMUNICATIONS
50.60
92576
23974/23980
1554.6160
DATA PROCESSING
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
90.50
92576
23974/23980
5910.6160
DATA PROCESSING
GENERAL (BILLING)
201.60
92576
23974/23980
1400.6160
DATA PROCESSING
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
700.00
92576
23974/23980
1550.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
977.03
92576
23974/23980
1160.6160
DATA PROCESSING
FINANCE
1,804.26
92576
23974/23980
1554.6230
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
5,962.00
92576
23974/23980
1551.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
CITY HALL GENERAL
6,381.70
92576
23974/23980
4400.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
CITY HALUPOLICE BUILDING
16,167.69
261826 712212004
105130 LUECKE, JULIE
66.95
KEYBOARD SPUTTER
92590
071604
1400.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
66.95
261827 712212004
101453 LUTZ, RICHARD M.
176.97
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
92591
071604
1400.6203
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
176.97
261828 7/2212004
112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP
548.94
CANDY
92577
162907
5320.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
POOL CONCESSIONS
R55CKREG LOG20000
Cheek # Date Amount
Vendor/ Explanation
350.54
CANDY
899.48
Council Check Register
261829 7122/2004
100864 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC.
2,449.50
PATCHER RENTAL
2,449.50
261830 7122/2004
100865 MAGNUSON SOD
80.00-
100868 MARK VII SALES
70.62
Business Unit
261831
7/22/2004
116708 MAGNUSON, BRIGHTON
Council Check Register
32.50
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
7/22/2004
32.50
261832
7/2212004
Inv No
100868 MARK VII SALES
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
55.95
163074
5320.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
1,715.00
92318
MD04246
1314.6180
21.95
STREET RENOVATION
92610
063004
1,470.50
SOU& BLACK DIRT
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
92610
28.00
5620.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH PARK
4,014.70
063004
5913.6543
SOD & BLACK DIRT
4,100.00
92610
063004
1643.6543
2,555.33
GENERAL TURF CARE
92426
071104
5,115.45
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
92269
98.00
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
19,174.88
689249
261833
7/2212004
YORK SELLING
103202 MARSTON, ELLIOTT
689250
5842.5515
24.00
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
92272
687232
24.00
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
261834
7/22/2004
686735
100870 MATRX
COST OF GOODS SOLQ MIX
VERNON SELLING
180.48
AMBULANCE SUPPLIES
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
180.48
92275
261835
7/22/2004
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
112360 MAY, DOUG
92276
688969
99.96
UNIFORM REIMBURSEMENT
YORK SELLING
92631
99.96
5842.5514
CITY OF EDINA
7/21/2004 10:35:15
Council Check Register
Page- 18
7/22/2004
- 7/22/2004
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
92578
163074
5320.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
POOL CONCESSIONS
92318
MD04246
1314.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
STREET RENOVATION
92610
063004
5422.6543
SOU& BLACK DIRT
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
92610
063004
5620.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH PARK
92610
063004
5913.6543
SOD & BLACK DIRT
DISTRIBUTION
92610
063004
1643.6543
SOD & BLACK DIRT
GENERAL TURF CARE
92426
071104
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
92269
686734
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
92270
689249
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
92271
689250
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
92272
687232
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
92273
686735
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLQ MIX
VERNON SELLING
92274
686733
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
92275
687233
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
92276
688969
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
92631
691613
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
92632
691614
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
92656
071904
1490.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
PUBLIC HEALTH
92657
857690
1470.6510
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
92611
071404
5630.6201
LAUNDRY
CENTENNIAL LAKES
CITY OF EDINA
7/21/2004 10:35:15
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 19
7/22/2004
-7/22/2004
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
261836
7/2212004
106603 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS
2,104.50
JULY 22 TRIP
92592
071304
1628.6103.07
TRIPS PROF SERVICES
SENIOR CITIZENS
2,104.50
261837
712212004
101327 MEDICINE SHOW MUSIC CO., THE
600.00
ENTERTAINMENT
92381
071204
5120.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP
600.00
261838
712212004
101483 MENARDS
336.11
LUMBER, NAILS
92217
35215
5422.6577
LUMBER
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
63.29
TIMBERS
92218
35679
5422.6577
LUMBER
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
110.76-
CREDIT
92219
35222
5422.6577
LUMBER
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
52.45
LUMBER
92612
43447
5620.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH PARK
61.15
BOLTS, NUTS, FILE SET
92613
42203
5913.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
DISTRIBUTION
402.24
261839
7/22/2004
101987 MENARDS
118.75
PAINTING SUPPLIES
92535
99010
5630.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTENNIAL LAKES
305.55
SUMP PUMPS
92536
885
5630.6530
REPAIR PARTS
CENTENNIAL LAKES
424.30
261840
712212004
103060 MERCURY WASTE SOLUTIONS
305.48
LAMP DISPOSAL
92375
208248
4095.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
50TH STREET RUBBISH
305.48
261841
7122/2004
100882 MERIT SUPPLY
337.71
CLEANERS
92537
64882
5421.6511
CLEANING SUPPLIES
GRILL
266.84
CHEMICALS, CLEANING PADS
92614
64772
5620.6511
CLEANING SUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH PARK
604.55
261842
712212004
116660 MERRIAM, KIM
78.00
PROGRAM REFUND
92319
071204
1600.4390.02
TENNIS PROGRAM
PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
78.00
261843
7/22/2004
101891 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY
151.07
BALLFIELD SUPPLIES
92320
76618
1642.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
FIELD MAINTENANCE
151.07
261844
712212004
100885 METRO SALES INC
.
388.80
PCU
92579
29691A
5410.6513
OFFICE SUPPLIES
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
388.80
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
7/21/2004 10:35:15
Council Check Register
Page - 20
7/22/2004
—7/22/2004
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
261845
7/2212004
116377 METRO SYSTEMS
291.38
FILE CABINET
92593
35190
1400.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
884.70
OFFICE EQUIPMENT
92658
35275
1495.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
INSPECTIONS
1 ,176.08
261846
712212004
100886 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
2,598.75
JULY 2004
92220
063004
1495.4307
SAC CHARGES
INSPECTIONS
2,596.75
261847
7/22/2004
100887 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONME
235,116.40
SEWER SERVICE
92376
777879
5922.6302
SEWER SERVICE METRO
SEWER TREATMENT
235,116.40
261848
7/2212004
116712 METROPOLITAN MEDIA GROUP INC.-
700.00
EDINA MAGAZINE AD
92538
152623
5410.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
700.00
261849
7/22/2004
102508 METZGER, MAURE ANN
83.53
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
92410
071104
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
83.53
261850
7122/2004
116696 MGE UPS SYSTEMS
656.98
UPS MAINTENANCE
92221
251464
1551.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
CITY HALL GENERAL
656.98
261861
7/22/2004
116753 MGS PROFESSIONAL BUILDING MAIN
3,290.00
WINDOW CLEANING
92659
17336
1551.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CITY HALL GENERAL
3,290.00
261852
7/2212004
100891 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP.
423.11
ASPHALT
92222
72201MB
1301.6518
BLACKTOP
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
11,811.46
ASPHALT
92222
72201MB
1314.6518
BLACKTOP
STREET RENOVATION
726.95
ASPHALT
92223
72235MB
1314.6518
BLACKTOP
STREET RENOVATION
474.03
ASPHALT
92368
72245MB
1301.6518
BLACKTOP
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
3,417.82
ASPHALT
92368
72245MB
1314.6518
BLACKTOP
STREET RENOVATION
16,853.37
261853
712212004
100692 MIDWEST COCA -COLA EAGAN
278.00
92277
80804088
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
175.00
92278
82513331
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
453.00
CITY OF EDINA
7121/2004 10:35:15
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 21
7/22/2004 - 7/22/2004
Check # Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
261864 712212004
101356 MIDWEST FENCE & MFG COMPANY
1,463.33
FENCING
92224
110561
1647.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PATHS & HARD SURFACE
1,463.33
FENCING
92224
110561
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
1,463.34
FENCING
92224
110561
5422.6251
SHARED MAINTENANCE
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
4,390.00
261855 712212004
103186 MIDWEST FUELS -
245.85
FUEL
92225
22004
5422.6581
GASOLINE
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
245.85
261856 712212004
102873 MILLER, SUSAN
179.55
SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT
92615
071604
1624.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PLAYGROUND & THEATER
240.16
SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT
92615
071604
1627.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
SPECIAL ACTIVITIES
419.71
-
261857 7122/2004
102582 MINN DEPT. OF LABOR & INDUSTRY
40.00
BOILER INSPECTION
92377
B42351R0420831
5311.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
POOL OPERATION
40.00
261868 712212004
100913 MINNEAPOLIS SUBURBAN SEWER & W
680.00
WATER SERVICE REPAIR
92616
32531
5913.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
DISTRIBUTION
680.00
261859 7/22/2004
101376 MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPMENT
406.74
HYDRAULIC PARTS
92226
0148780
5913.6530
REPAIR PARTS
DISTRIBUTION
1,682.26
HYDRANT & PARTS
92617
0150002
5913.6530
REPAIR PARTS
DISTRIBUTION
2,089.00
261860 7/2212004
112908 MINNESOTA ROADWAYS CO.
97.77
ASPHALT EMULSION
92227
45837
1301.6406.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
97.77
261861 712212004
101410 MINNESOTA STATE BOARD OF ELECT
25.00
ELECTRICAL PERMIT
92321
071404
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
47.50
MAINT FEE- JULY,AUG,SEPT
92322
7604
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING .
47.50
MAINT FEE- JULY,AUG,SEPT
92322
7604
5912.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDINGS
47.50
MAINT FEE- JULY,AUG,SEPT
92322
7604
1551.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CITY HALL GENERAL
47.50
MAINT FEE- JULY,AUG,SEPT
92322
7604
1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
47.50
MAINT FEE- JULY,AUG,SEPT
92322
7604
5820.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
50TH STREET GENERAL
47.50
MAINT FEE- JULY,AUG,SEPT
92322
7604
1470.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
47.50
MAINT FEE- JULY,AUG,SEPT
92322
7604
1322.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
7/21/2004 10:35:15
Council Check Register
Page - 22
7/22/2004
— 7/22/2004
Cheek #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
25.00
ELECTRICAL PERMIT
92323
071304
1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
25.00
ELECTRICAL PERMIT
92324
07 -14-04
1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
407.50
261862
7122/2004
100899 MINNESOTA STATE TREASURER
5,336.04
JUNE 2004
92228
063004
1495.4380
SURCHARGE
INSPECTIONS
5,336.04
261863
712212004
101144 MINNESOTA UC FUND
7,631.79
UNEMPLOYMENT COMP
92445
071304
1550.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
7,631.79
261864
7/22/2004
102303 MINNESOTA VALLEY LANDSCAPE
INC
48,450.00
CITY HALLPOLICE FACILITY
92229
9951C
4400.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
CITY HALUPOLICE BUILDING
48,450.00
261866
7/22/2004
112956 MOHAMOUD, MOHAMED
55.00
PROGRAM STAFF
92618
071404
1629.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ADAPTIVE RECREATION
55.00
261866
7122/2004
106190 MOORE, MARY CARROLL
34.13
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
92411
071104
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
34.13
261867
7/22/2004
100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC.
158.20
SUMP PUMPS
92325
420297 -00
1642.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
FIELD MAINTENANCE
153.89
FUSES
92619
410115 -00
5630.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTENNIAL LAKES
312.09
261868
712212004
114343 MULLEN, JANET
37.38
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
92412
071104
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
37.38
261869
7/22/2004
110522 MUNICIPAL BUILDERS INC.
300.00
PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 6
92364
071404
05423.1705.30
CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS
WELL #14 REHAB 6367 DEWEY HILL
33,011.85
PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 6
92364
071404
05428.1705.30
CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS
WELL #19 REHAB
33,311.85
261670
712212004
106662 NET LITIN DISTRIBUTORS
74.55
HELIUM TANKS
92382
20521
5120.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP
74.55
CITY OF EDINA
7/21/2004 10:35:15
R55CKREG
LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 23
7/22/2004
- 7/22/2004
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
261871
712212004
116703 NEWCASTLE REFRACTORIES CO.
2,193.01
24 x 12 SLABS
92383
843881RI
5111.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT
2,193.01
261872
712212004
100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO.
190.00
92472
26603
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
190.00
261673
712212004
111483 NICHOLSON, JEFFREY
65.00
PIANO TUNING
92620
070204
5610.6230
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT
ED-ADMINISTRATION
65.00
261874
712212004
104350 NIKE USA INC.
326.78
GOLF BAGS
92539
107428669
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
54.88
GOLF BAG
92540
107428670
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
381.66
261875
7/2212004
116697 NORBLOM PLUMBING
17.60
PERMIT REFUND
92230
ED027245
1495.4112
PLUMBING PERMITS
INSPECTIONS
17.60
261876
7/22/2004
105672 NORTHERN POWER PRODUCTS INC.
52.53
WIRE SET
92231
143132
5422.6530
REPAIR PARTS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
52.53
-
261877
712212004
103133 NORTHERN TOOL & EQUIPMENT
28.15
COUPLERS
92541
10271367
5630.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTENNIAL LAKES
28.15
261878
7122/2004
100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY
93.12
PENCILS, SKETCH PADS
92384
30105700
5120.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP
134.94
CANVAS PANELS
92385
30104200
5120.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP
228.06
261879
712212004
100936 OLSEN COMPANIES
260.41
SAFETY HARNESSES
92232
288576
5913.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
DISTRIBUTION
189.78-
CREDIT
92233
288531
5422.6530
REPAIR PARTS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
70.63
261880
7/22/2004
106230 OSVOG, KYLE CLAYTON
39.00
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
92413
071104
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
39.00
R55CKREG LOG20000
198.00
CITY OF EDINA
92326
071204
1550.6121
ADVERTISING PERSONNEL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
Council Check Register
198.00
7/22/2004 - 7/22/2004
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No Inv No Account No
Subledger Account Description
261881
712212004
100939 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC.
48.75
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
94.64
COOKIES
92580 68715343 5320.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
94.64
48.75
261882
712212004
101530 PANCAKE, CHAR
261885
712212004
116704 PARSONS, JOAN B
39.00
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
92414 071104 5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
39.00
35.75
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
92420
261883
712212004
ART WORK SOLD
100941 PARK NICOLLET CLINIC
7/21/2004 10:35:15
Page - 24
Business Unit
POOL CONCESSIONS
ART CENTER REVENUES
198.00
EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS
92326
071204
1550.6121
ADVERTISING PERSONNEL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
198.00
261884
712212004
116603 PARKER, KATHY
48.75
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
92423
071104
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
48.75
261885
712212004
116704 PARSONS, JOAN B
35.75
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
92420
071104
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
35.75
261886
7/2212004
100347 PAUSTIS & SONS
39.90
92279
8039625 -IN
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
1,949.00
92473
8041415 -IN
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
931.00
92474
8041412 -IN
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD VINE
YORK SELLING
480.00
92475
8041413 -IN
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
819.80
92476
8041414 -IN
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
780.00
92477
8041590 -IN
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
4,999.70
261887
712212004
110832 PC2 SOLUTIONS, INC.
420.00
COMPUTER SERVICES
92581
61904008
1554.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
420.00
261888
7/22/2004
100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY
136.50
92446
66384601
5320.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
POOL CONCESSIONS
398.85
92542
67130347
5630.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
CENTENNIAL LAKES
991.40
92543
64058091
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
334.80
92544
65269515
5430.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
1,861.55
261889
712212004
100946 PERA
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation
78,205.89 PPEND 7 /13/04
78,205.89
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
7/22/2004 -7/22/2004
PO # Doc No Inv No Account No
92660 071604 1000.2023
Subledger Account Description
P.E.R.A. PAYABLE
7/21/2004 10:35:15
Page - 25
Business Unit
GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET
261890 712212004
100948 PERKINS LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS
5,798.50
COMPLETION OF TEE #17
92234
PO 6130
5422.6251
SHARED MAINTENANCE
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
5,798.50
261891 712212004
116718 PHELPS PEARSON, SUSAN
75.00
AWARD OF EXCELLENCE
92560
071304
5120.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP
75.00
261893 7122/2004
100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
843.95
92280
2089487
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
1,492.29
92281
2089484
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
46.90
92282
2089485
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
163.40
92283
2089486
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
1,428.74
92284
2089479
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
3,026.49
92285
2089480
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
241.78-
92286
3301002
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
30.32-
92287
3301501
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
22,20-
92288
3301003
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
463.85
92352
2089483
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
1,354.15
92478
2092244
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
584.80
92479
2092236
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
1,025.85
92480
2092239
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
323.20
92481
2092237
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
44.85
92482
2092238
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
62.88-
92483
3301502
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
17,33-
92484
3301433
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
14.05-
92485
3301325
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
1,429.30
92633
2092242
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
78814
92634
2092240
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
1,100.63
92635
2092241
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
13,727.98
261894 7/2212004 106876 PICKERMAN'S SOUP AND SANDWICHE
161.79 BOX LUNCHES 92386 400
161.79
5120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP
261896 7/2212004 106071 PLAYWORKS OF PRIOR LAKE
8.00 .DAILY ADM REFUND 92564 071504 5301.4541 GENERAL ADMISSIONS AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES
8.00
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
7121/2004 10:35:15
Council Check Register
Page- 26
7/22/2004
- 7/22/2004
Check # Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
261896 7122/2004
100961 POSTMASTER
591.00
ABOUT BUSINESS POSTAGE
92623
071604
2210.6123
MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE
COMMUNICATIONS
591.00
261897 712212004
100962 PRECISION BUSINESS SYSTEMS
392.99
CASSETTE TRANSCRIBER
92594
077477
1400.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
392.99
261898 71221200.4
101032 PRINT SHOP, THE
755.09
NEWSLETTER
92595
19394
1628.6575
PRINTING
SENIOR CITIZENS
755.09
261899 7/2212004
100968 PRIOR WINE COMPANY
1,421.50
92289
916200
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
630.48
92353
918079
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
2,183.27
92486
918075
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
1,484.85
92487
918081
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
5,720.10
261900 7/2212004
100971 QUALITY WINE
7.65-
92290
426048 -00
5840.5518
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
382.60
92290
426048 -00
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
6.56-
92354
427552 -00
5820.5518
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
BOTH STREET GENERAL
665.20
92354
427552 -00
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
2.41-
92355
427661 -00
5820.5518
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
50TH STREET GENERAL
244.70
92355
427661 -00
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
BOTH ST SELLING
23.42-
92356
427778-00
5820.5518
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
50TH STREET GENERAL
1,182.50
92356
427778-00
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
BOTH ST SELLING
7.53-
92488
427660 -00
5840.5518
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
760.71
92488
427660 -00
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
24.62-
92489
427583-00
5840.5518
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
2,499.98
92489
427583-00
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
34.72-
92490
427839-00
5840.5518
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
1,751.65
92490
427839-00
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
15.25-
92491
427393 -00
5860.5518
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
1,545.93
92491
427393 -00
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
12,10.
92492
426986-00
5860.5518
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
1,226,92
92492
426986-00
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
4,73
92493
427735 -00
5860.5518
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
237.61
92493
427735 -00
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
0,358.81
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
7122/2004 — 7/22/2004
Check # Date Amount Vendor I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
261901 7/22/2004 103930 QUIST, SUSAN
49.97 CLOTHING REIMBURSEMENT 92596 070704 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
7/21/2004 10:35:15
Page - 27
Business Unit
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET
GENERAL SUPPLIES FIREWORKS
GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
ART WORK SOLD. ART CENTER REVENUES
BUILDINGS ART CENTER BALANCE SHEET
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION
COST OF GOODS SOLD VANVALKENBURG
COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL
COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL
49.97
261902
712212004
112662 RADIO SHACK CORPORATION
42.56
REPAIR PARTS
92327
176220
1646.6406
42.56
261903
712212004
100287 RAMSEY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPART
300.00
OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT
92597
071604
1000.2055
300.00
261904
7/22/2004
102637 RES SPECIALTY PYROTECHNICS
13,000.00
FIREWORKS DISPLAY
92235
5331
1505.6406
13.000.00
261905
712212004
100842 RETAIL SERVICES
10.64
CHANGER KIT
92236
06220400307399
1400.6406
10.64
261906
7/2212004
102095 RICKERT, DAVID
74.75
ARTWORK SOLD AT EAC
92415
071104
5101.4413
74.75
261907
7122/2004
105131 ROOF SPEC INC.
650.50
ROOF DESIGN SERVICES
92447
50399
5100.1720
650.50
261908
7122/2004
105534 ROTARY CLUB OF EDINAIMORNINGSI
195.00
DUES
92237
142
1120.6105.
195.00
261909
7122/2004
101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT
184.41
CONCESSION PRODUCT
92328
071304
4075.5510
366.99
FOOD
92545
7113/2004
5421.5510
551.40
261910
7122/2004
100305 SARA LEE COFFEE & TEA
431.97
COFFEE
92546
8721225
5421.5510
431.97
GENERAL SUPPLIES
7/21/2004 10:35:15
Page - 27
Business Unit
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET
GENERAL SUPPLIES FIREWORKS
GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
ART WORK SOLD. ART CENTER REVENUES
BUILDINGS ART CENTER BALANCE SHEET
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION
COST OF GOODS SOLD VANVALKENBURG
COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL
COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL
7/21/2004 10:35:15
Page - 28
Business Unit
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE
ART CENTER REVENUES
1,695.19
KILN EQUIPMENT
92387
CITY OF EDINA
5100.1730
R55CKREG LOG20000
ART CENTER BALANCE SHEET
1,695.19
Council Check Register
7122/2004
101342 SOCCER EXPRESS
7/22/2004 - 7/22/2004
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No Account No
Subledger Account Description
261911
712212004
100990 SCHARBER & SONS
432.00
300.33
J.P. HOOD
92329
2039145 5422.6530
REPAIR PARTS
101002 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS INC
300.33
261912
712212004
100301 SIMPLOT PARTNERS
150686
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
415.35
LIQUID FERTILIZER
92238
400029SI 5422.6540
FERTILIZER
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
2,009.12
FUNGICIDE
92239
400028SI 5431.6545
CHEMICALS
92357
152365
2,424.47
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
261913
712212004
92358
116605 SLATTERY, JEAN
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
13.00
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
92421
071104 5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
13.00
11.50
92360
261914
7122/2004
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
103339 SMITHSHARPE FIRE BRICK SUPPLY
7/21/2004 10:35:15
Page - 28
Business Unit
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE
ART CENTER REVENUES
1,695.19
KILN EQUIPMENT
92387
25252
5100.1730
OFFICE FURN & EQUIPMENT
ART CENTER BALANCE SHEET
1,695.19
261916
7122/2004
101342 SOCCER EXPRESS
432.00
T- SHIRTS
92661
0276
1470.6558
DEPT UNIFORMS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
432.00
261916
712212004
101002 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS INC
5,137.00
92291
150686
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
27,10
92292
150685
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
1,379.35
92357
152365
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
65.70
92358
152366
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
645.80
92359
152360
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
11.50
92360
152361
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
57.20
92547
345690
5430.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
7,323.65
261917
712212004
110977 SOW, ADAMA
109.20
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
92416
071104
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
109.20
261918
712212004
104876 SPECTRUM COMMERCIAL SERVICES
404.70
AUTO IMPOUND FORMS
92598
401603-01
1400.6575
PRINTING
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
404.70
261919
712212004
101004 SPS COMPANIES
66.29
ACTUATOR CARTRIDGES
92330
S1037658.001
1646.6530
REPAIR PARTS
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
66.29
CITY OF EDINA
7/21/2004 10:35:15
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 29
7/27/2004
—7/22/2004
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor I Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
261920
712212004
110976 STAGES THEATRE CO.
500.00
FINAL PAYMENT
92621
67
5610.6136
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER
ED ADMINISTRATION
500.00
261921
712212004
101007 STAR TRIBUNE
27.95
SUBSCRIPTION
92378
070504
1551.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CITY HALL GENERAL
27.95
261922
712212004
116706 STEPHENS, RICHARD
146.25
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
92424
071104
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
146.25
261923
712212004
116719 STEWART, BRIAN
75.00
AWARD OF EXCELLENCE
92561
071304
5120.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP
75.00
261924
7/2212004
101766 STROH, STEVE
487.00
TUITION REIMBURSEMENT
92599
070604
1400.6104
CONFERENCES 6 SCHOOLS
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
487.00
261926
712212004
102140 SUN MOUNTAIN SPORTS INC.
731.26
SPEED CARTS
92548
489595
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
731.26
261926
7/22/2004
116706 SYME, DIANE
65.00
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
92422
071104
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
40.00
AWARD OF MERIT
92562
071304
5120.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP
105.00
261927
712212004
104932 TAYLOR MADE
55.42
MERCHANDISE
92549
07228297
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
55.42
261928
712212004
116726 TECH CENTER
62.22
PEDAL
92600
TC109827
1400.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
62.22
261929
7/2212004
113649 TENNIS WEST
2,000.00
BASKETBALL COURT WORK
92331
04 -616
1647.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PATHS 8 HARD SURFACE
2,000.00
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
7/21/2004 10:35:15
Council Check Register
Page - 30
7/22/2004
-7/2212004
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
261930
7122/2004
112248 TERMINIX
85.00
PEST CONTROL
92332
8040785
5311.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
POOL OPERATION
85.00
261931
712212004
101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
84.15
92293
339915
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
2,469.30
92294
339914
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
123.05
92550
340224
5421.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
GRILL
267.00
92551
13272
5421.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
GRILL
2,943.50
261932
712212004
103366 TIME WARNER CABLE
104.33
CABLE TV ADVERTISING
92369
141864
5822.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
50TH ST SELLING
104.33
CABLE TV ADVERTISING
92369
141864
5842.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
YORK SELLING
104.34
CABLE TV ADVERTISING
92369
141864
5862.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
VERNON SELLING
313.00
261933
712212004
101474 TITLEIST
813.79
GOLF BALLS
92552
1359312
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
813.79
261934
712212004
103163 TREUTING, KRISTEN
96.53
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
92417
071104
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
96.53
261936
712212004
101042 TRIARCO
269.89
PAPER, INK, BRAYERS
92388
838577
5110.6564
CRAFT SUPPLIES
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
104.48
PLAYGROUND SUPPLIES
92662
693617
1624.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PLAYGROUND & THEATER
374.37
261936
712212004
101047 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO
189.89
DOOR REPAIR
92553
219481
5630.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
CENTENNIAL LAKES
189.89
261937
7/2212004
100363 U.S. BANK
50.00
4833 4960 0545 2508
92240
070604
1120.6106
MEETING EXPENSE
ADMINISTRATION
17.99
USB CABLE
92241
JUL 6
1400.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
84.00
BOOKS
92241
JUL 6
1504.6218
EDUCATION PROGRAMS
HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION
54.71
PHONE BATTERIES
92448
071404
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
223.65
UNIFORMS
92448
071404
1646.6201
LAUNDRY
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
593.24
SAFETY LUNCH - DAVANNIS
92448
071404
1301.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
1,023.59
CITY OF EDINA
7/21/2004 10:35:15
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register.
Page - 31
7/22/2004
- 7122/2004
Check # Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
261938 7/22/2004
101051 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
735.40
92601
063004
1419.6203
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
RESERVE PROGRAM
3,405.87
92601
063004
1400.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
4,498.63
92601
063004
1400.6203
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
8,639.90
261939 7122/2004
100371 UNITED RENTALS
9,877.28
CURBING MACHINE
92242
41549487 -001
1305.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
1,991.45
CURBFORMS, LUTES
92243
41549541 -001
1301.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
11,868.73
261940 7/2212004
101908 US FOODSERVICE INC
249.95
LINERS, TISSUE
92244
33183608
5311.6511
CLEANING SUPPLIES
POOL OPERATION
372.51
CONCESSION PRODUCT
92244
33183608
5320.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
POOL CONCESSIONS
61.14
CLEANING PRODUCTS
92333
33184588
5311.6511
CLEANING SUPPLIES
POOL OPERATION
500.17.
CONCESSION PRODUCT
92333
33184588
5320.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
POOL CONCESSIONS
437.03
CONCESSION PRODUCT
92334
33185731
5320.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
POOL CONCESSIONS
477.97
CONCESSION PRODUCT
92582
33188205
5320.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
POOL CONCESSIONS
2,098.77
261941 712212004
101058 VAN PAPER CO.
227.64
CAN LINERS
92335
536738
1645.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
LITTER REMOVAL
278.23
CAN LINERS
92336
537234
1645.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
LITTER REMOVAL
505.87
261942 7/22/2004
106308 VEITH, MICHELLE
47.00
LUNCHES
92622
92008
1629.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ADAPTIVE RECREATION
47.00
261943 7122/2004
102886 WAGNER GREENHOUSES INC.
113.43
PLANTINGS
92337
110264
1644.6541
PLANTINGS & TREES
TREES & MAINTENANCE
113.43
261944 7/2212004
103466 WASTE MANAGEMENT - SAVAGE MN
35.00
92449
2714261
5821.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
50TH ST OCCUPANCY
40.30
92449
2714261
1481.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
YORK FIRE STATION
41.52
92449
2714261
5111.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT
64.03
92449
2714261
1645.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
LITTER REMOVAL
70.52
92449
2714261
1470.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
76.52
92449
2714261
5841.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
YORK OCCUPANCY
76.62
92449
2714261
5861.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
VERNON OCCUPANCY
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor % Explanation
Council Check Register
50TH ST SELLING
81.52
7/22/2004
- 7/22/2004
5862.5513
90.30
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
155.21
2714261
5430.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
160.82
2714261
1628.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
178.34
2714261
1645.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
179.55
2714261
1645.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
234.91
2714261
5311.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
239.29
2714261
1551.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
305.71
2714261
5422.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
305.71
2714261
5511.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
369.69
2714261
1301.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
482.15
2714261
1552.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
3,187.71
2714261
261945
712212004
92449
116516 WELDON, KEN
5620.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
152.75
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
152.75
261946
7/2212004
101077 WEST WELD SUPPLY CO.
155.15
WELDING SUPPLIES
836.95
WELDING TOOLS
992.10
261947
7/2212004
101033 WINE COMPANY, THE
656.55
461.70
1,876.90
2,995.15
261948
712212004
101312 WINE MERCHANTS
814.00
809.45
662.10
2,285.55
261949
7/22/2004
102019 WOIT, DIANE
32.50
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
32.50
261960
7/22/2004
101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC
599.50
389.00
92418 071104
92370 63445
92450 59118
92494 31556 -00
92495 31627 -00
92636 31628 -00
92295 100030
92496 100557
92497 100556
92419 071104
92296 152398
92498 152623
5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD
1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
7/21/2004 10:35:15
Page - 32
Business Unit
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
SENIOR CITIZENS
LITTER REMOVAL
LITTER REMOVAL
POOL OPERATION
CITY HALL GENERAL
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
CLUB HOUSE
EDINBOROUGH PARK
ART CENTER REVENUES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
CENTENNIAL LAKES
5842.5513
.CITY OF EDINA
YORK SELLING
5822.5513
Council Check Register
50TH ST SELLING
5862.5513
7/22/2004
- 7/22/2004
5862.5513
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
92449
2714261
5430.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
92449
2714261
1628.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
92449
2714261
1645.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
92449
2714261
1645.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
92449
2714261
5311.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
92449
2714261
1551.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
92449
2714261
5422.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
92449
2714261
5511.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
92449
2714261
1301.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
92449
2714261
1552.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
92449
2714261
5420.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
92449
2714261
5620.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
92418 071104
92370 63445
92450 59118
92494 31556 -00
92495 31627 -00
92636 31628 -00
92295 100030
92496 100557
92497 100556
92419 071104
92296 152398
92498 152623
5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD
1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
7/21/2004 10:35:15
Page - 32
Business Unit
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
SENIOR CITIZENS
LITTER REMOVAL
LITTER REMOVAL
POOL OPERATION
CITY HALL GENERAL
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
CLUB HOUSE
EDINBOROUGH PARK
ART CENTER REVENUES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
CENTENNIAL LAKES
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES
5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
162.5513. COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation
261961 712212004 101726 XCEL ENERGY
1,188.38
1 .1.. e
261962 712212004
104.00
357.88
733.56
79.88
1,275.32
261963 7/2212004
345.00
345.00
984,434.31
100568 XEROX CORPORATION
JUNE USAGE
JUNE USAGE
JUNE USAGE
STAPLES
101091 ZIEGLER INC
GENERATOR MAINTENANCE
Grand Total
CITY OF EDINA 7/21/2004 10:35:15
Council Check Register Page - 33
7/22/2004 — 7%22/2004
PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
92637 152660 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
92245 0901769168189 5111.6185
92338 1916215721190 5630.6185
92379 1746 - 737629177 5913.6185
92389
003400764
5110.6151
92602
003400612
1400.6230
92663
003584738
1550.6151
92664
188156220
1550.6406
92665 E3809704
1551.6180
Payment Instrument Totals
Check Total 984,434.31
Total Payments 984,434.31
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT
CENTENNIAL LAKES
DISTRIBUTION
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL
R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/21/2004 10:40:32
Council Check Summary Page - 1
7/2212004 - 7/22/2004
Company
Amount
01000 GENERAL FUND
213,502.35
02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND
45,434.55
04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND
76,011.19
05100 ART CENTER FUND
11,878.90
05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND
5,802.94
05400 GOLF COURSE FUND
40,586.46
05500 ICE ARENA FUND
361.89
05600 EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND
15,916.93
05800 LIQUOR FUND
121,762.02
05900 UTILITY FUND
438,603.21
05930 STORM SEWER FUND
14,375.50
07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND
198.37
Report Totals 984,434.31
We Ootff m to the bast of our knowbftA
and belief, that these dain
comply M an aster respects
with the rW1r9mwft Of the City
of Edina puF-CIF-10sinp ides and
�ooedurss 25C 1
R55CKREG LOG20000
7/2912004
100614 ACE SUPPLY CO. INC.,
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
45.03.
FILTERS
92802
586234
1330.6406
7/2912004
-7/29/2004
Check # Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
261964 712912004
261957
102403 AAA LAMBERTS LANDSCAPE PRODUCT
100615 ACME WINDOW CLEANING INC
237.49
BLACK DIRT
92801
16278
1301.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
RAMP GLASS
237.49
053399
1375.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PARKING RAMP
261955 712912004
1,054.35
102971 ACE ICE COMPANY
65.24
7/2912004
92666
442540
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
87.96
92961
442838
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
93020
84.52
5111.6250
92962
443855
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
21.30
93.18
93021
92963
442541
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
109.20
45.01
93120
442836
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
92.68
261959
93121
443848
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
65.96
93122
443853
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
PRINTING
59.96
C361001
93123
442837
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
7/28/2004 9:27:44
Page- 1
Business Unit
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
50TH ST SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
261956
7/2912004
100614 ACE SUPPLY CO. INC.,
45.03.
FILTERS
92802
586234
1330.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
TRAFFIC SIGNALS
45.03
261957
7129/2004
100615 ACME WINDOW CLEANING INC
1,054.35
RAMP GLASS
92803
053399
1375.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PARKING RAMP
1,054.35
261968
7/2912004
106162 ADT SECURITY SERVICES
23.71
ALARM SERVICE
93020
75701443
5111.6250
ALARM SERVICE
ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT
21.30
REPLACE BATTERIES
93021
76128858
5111.6250
ALARM SERVICE
ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT
45.01
261959
7129/2004
100621 ALBINSON REPROGRAPHICS
233.02
PRINTING
92766
C361001
5300.1705
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET
233.02
261960
7129/2004
100676 ALL SAFE FIRE & SECURITY
194.62
CHEMICAL CERTIFICATION
92894
60601
5620.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH PARK
194.62
261961
712912004
100867 ALSTAD, MARIAN
1,044.00
INSTRUCTOR AC
93080
071904
5110.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
1,044.00
261962
7129/2004
100675 AMERA -CHEM INC..
39.95
DRUG ID BIBLE
92895
25993
1400.6405
BOOKS & PAMPHLETS
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
.7/28/2004 9:27:44
Council Check Register
Page - 2
7/29/2004
- 7/29/2004
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor/ Explanation PO #
Doc No.
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
39.95
261963
712912004
100595 ANOKA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
100.00
OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT
93117
072604
1000.2055
DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS
GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET
100.00
261964
7/29/2004
102172 APPERTS FOODSERVICE
476.00
FOOD
92767
230491
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
123.75
FOOD
93022
232475
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
599.75
261965
7129/2004
102646 AQUA LOGIC INC.
165.37
POOL. CHEMICALS
92728
25264
5311.6545
CHEMICALS
POOL OPERATION
65.50
POOL CLEANER
92896
25301
5620.6511
CLEANING SUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH PARK
2,385.60
POOL HEATER
92897
25249
5620.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH PARK
388.67
CALHYPO, CLEANER
92898
25239
5620.6545
CHEMICALS
EDINBOROUGH PARK
91.75
DE, ACID
92899
25194
5620.6545
CHEMICALS
EDINBOROUGH PARK
3,096.89
261966
712912004
101977 ARCH WIRELESS
198.50
PAGER RENTAL
92804.
N6339611G
1470.6151
EQUIPMENT. RENTAL
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
198.50
261967
712912004
113896 ART TIME
135.00
INSTRUCTOR AC
93081
071904
5110.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
135.00
261968
712912004
103857 ASATO, SHEILA
384.00
INSTRUCTOR AC
93082
071904
5110.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
384.00
261969
7/2912004
102972 AT&T
74.53
MICROWAVES & PIZZA OVEN
92768
071904
5840.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
148.96
MICROWAVES & PIZZA OVEN
92768
071904
5860.6406
GENERAL.SUPPLIES
VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
223.49
261970
7/2912004
101964 AUGIE'S INC.
87.52
FOOD
93023
4773
5430.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
87.52
261971
7/29/2004
101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION
2,827.00
92964
30142200.
'842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
CITY OF EDINA
7/28/2u- 9:27:44
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 3'
7/29/2004
- 7/29/2004
Check # Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
819.00
92965
30142600
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
1,242.00
92966
30097800
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
111.00
92967
30114600
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
146.00
93124
30142300
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
145.04
93125
38703800
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
180.97
93126
38681200
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
23.00
93127
38703900
5862.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
VERNON SELLING
51.74
93127
38703900
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
310.00
93128
30142100
5822.5513
COST'OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
5,855.75
261972 712912004
103406 BENNEROTTE MARKETING AGENCY
139.25
.SHOWER PARTS
92901
59425
5620.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EDINBOROUGH PARK
139.25
261973 7/2912004
108670 BERNER, JIM
150.00
PERFORMANCE 812/04
92902
072304
5610.6136
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER
ED ADMINISTRATION
150.00
261974 7/2912004
100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS
35.26
OFFICE SUPPLIES
92729
3089660
1120.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES .
ADMINISTRATION
37.26
OFFICE SUPPLIES
92805
3060410
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
72.52
261975 7129/2004
100650 BEST ACCESS SYSTEMS
15.73
KEYS
92806
MN- 338844
5421.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GRILL
15.73
261976 7129/2004
102392 BLACK, STEVE
267.00
SOFTBALL OFFICIATING
92903
072304
4077.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
267.00
261977 7/2912004
100663 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE
36.80
PETTY CASH
93024
072304
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
38.09
PETTY CASH
93024
072304
5410.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
53.25
PETTY CASH
93024
072304
5422.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
MAINT OF COURSE 8 GROUNDS
128.14
261978 712912004
106661 BREEZY POINT RESORT
326.00
SEPT 22 -24 CONFERENCE
92904
072304
1490.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
PUBLIC HEALTH
326.00
R55CKREG LOG20000
MT99509
1400.6406
92731
CITY OF EDINA
1400.6406
92810
NT37859
1470.6513
92907
NVO0694
Council Check Register
7/29/2004 -7/29/2004
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No Account No
Subledger Account Description
261979
712912004
100667 BROCK WHITE COMPANY
110.56
SAW BLADES
92808
11220466 -00 1301.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
110.56
261980
7/29/2004
101241 BROWN TRAFFIC PRODUCTS
1,597.50
LIGHTS
92807
164939 1330.6530
REPAIR PARTS
1,597.50
261981
712912004
100669 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC.
408.75
BALLFIELD LIME
92809
071504 1642.6542
INFIELD MIXTURE
408.75
261982
7/29/2004
100671 BUDGET LIGHTING
304.26
REPAIR BULBS
92905
00255719 5511.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
-
304.26
261983
7/29/2004
103952 CAFARELLI, MICOL
7/28/2004 9:27:44
Page- 4
Business Unit
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
TRAFFIC SIGNALS
FIELD MAINTENANCE
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
625.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 93083 071904 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
625.00
261984 712912004 100004 CAMCO LUBRICANTS
357.84 OIL 92906 050913 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
357.84
261986 7/2912004 102046 CAMPE, HARRIET
618.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 93084 071904 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
618.00
261986 7/29/2004 103376 CARLSON MARKETING GROUP
109.39 PARADE SHIRTS 93025 1129575 1627.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES
109.39
261987 712912004 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE
261988 7/29/2004
429.99
420.00-
96.98
662.42
769.39
102372. CDW GOVERNMENT INC.
40GB UNIV INTERNAL
RETURN (FREIGHT CHG)
DRUM KIT
TONER, DRUM KITS
92667 38893 5822.5513
92730
MT99509
1400.6406
92731
CMMZ91181
1400.6406
92810
NT37859
1470.6513
92907
NVO0694
1400.6406
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
50TH ST SELLING
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
CITY OF EDINA
7/28/2t,., -, 9:27:44
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 5
7/29/2004
- 7/29/2004
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
261989
712912004
112661 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO
42.67
93026
071604
5430.6186
HEAT
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
1,684.47
93027
072104
1551.6186
HEAT
CITY HALL GENERAL
37.28
93028
JUL16
7411.6186
HEAT
PSTF OCCUPANCY
185.59
93029
JULY16
7411.6186
HEAT
PSTF OCCUPANCY
1,950.01
261990
7/2912004
116767 CHOI, DAVID
315.00
PROGRAM REFUND
93030
072304
1600.4390.15
GEN ADAPTIVE REC
PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
315.00
261991
7/2912004
116771 CIRCUS JUVENTAS
450.00
ADVERTISING
93095
071904
5110.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
450.00
_
261992
712912004
103040 CITY PAGES
260.00
ADVERTISING
93031
100065136
5110.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
260.00
261993
7/29/2004
116304 CLAY, DON
50.00
VIDEO EDITING
92769
070904
2210.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
COMMUNICATIONS
20.00
MEDIA INSTRUCTOR
93085
071904
5125.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
MEDIA STUDIO
70.00
261994
7/29/2004
100693 COMMERCIAL FURNITURE BROKERS
186.38
FF PEDS, WORKSURFACE
92811
00089543
1552.6530
REPAIR PARTS
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
186.38
261995
7/29/2004
106229 COMMUNITY HEALTH CONFERENCE
110.00
SEPT 22 -24 CONFERENCE
92908
072304
1490.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
PUBLIC HEALTH
110.00
261996
712912004
102490 COMPUSA INC.
581.48
PRINTERS, INK
93032
401103763,
5125.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
MEDIA STUDIO
581.48
261997
7/29/2004
101323 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS
88.48
EAR PLUGS
92732
02359037
1301.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
171.97
GLOVES, TAPE
92812
02352943
1553.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
345.12
GLOVES, EARPLUGS
92813
02354650
1301.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
311.17
SAFETY GLASSES, GLOVES
92814
02356616
1553.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
CITY OF EDINA
7/28/2004 9:27:44
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 6
7/29/2004
- 7/29/2004
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
68.96
HIGHWAY WARNING TRIANGLES
92815
02356957
1301.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
985.70
261998
712912004
100695 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO.
691.32
CLAY
93033
INV000006205
5120.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP
691.32
261999
712912004
104948 CONTINENTAL RESEARCH CORPORATI
195.40
DEGREASER
92816
205387 -CRC -1
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
195.40
262000
712912004
102249 CRITTER CONTROL
186.38
REMOVE BIRD NESTS
92733
43096
1646.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
186.38
262001
712912004
100402 CROW WING COUNTY ATTY OFFICE
85.00
REGISTRATION REFUND
93034
072104
7401.4390
REGISTRATION FEES
PSTF REVENUE
85.00
262002
712912004
116755 CSI ERGONOMICS
261.62
KEYBOARD
92735
INV013872
1400.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
1,594.69
WORKSTATION ITEMS
92736
INV013868
1400.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
1,135.30
CHAIRS
92909
INV013907
1400.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
2,991.61
262003
7/2912004
100700 CURTIS 1000
1,134.23
ENVELOPES
93035
63020001
5910.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL (BILLING)
1,134.23
262004
7/29/2004
100701 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO.
35.58
RIM, CAP
92817
127545
5422.6530
REPAIR PARTS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
35.58
262005
712912004
102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING
2,908.95
92668
264189
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
85.60
92669
264186
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
1,967.93
92670
272517
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
52.40
92671
272518
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
3,717.62
92792
.273471
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
623.75
92793
273476
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
1,587.35
93129
273467
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
13.40
93130
273468
"862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
CITY OF EDINA
7/28/200x. 9:27:44
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 7
7/29/2004
- 7/29/2004
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
10,957.00
262006
712912004
100720 DENNYS 6TH AVE. BAKERY
55.77
BAKERY
92770
172323
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
54.36
BAKERY
92771
172376
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
54.45
BAKERY
92772
172405
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
138.13
BAKERY
93036
172488
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
24.42
BAKERY
93037
172452
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
75.61
BAKERY
93038
172651
5421.5510
COSTDF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
113.39
BAKERY
93039
172657
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
516.13
262007
712912004
100662 DIETRICHSON, BILL
336.00
INSTRUCTOR AC
93086
071904
5110.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
336.00
262008
712912004
100420 DOGGIE WALK BAGS
287.00
DOGGIE BAGS
92818
200407156
1647.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PATHS & HARD SURFACE
287.00
262009
7129/2004
116763 DOUGHMAN, CAROL
420.00
LAWN REPAIR
92910
072204
5932.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
GENERAL STORM SEWER
420.00
262010
7/29/2004
104868 DUNN, MATT
50.00
FAMILY JAMBOREE
92911
072204
1624.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PLAYGROUND & THEATER
50.00
262011
7/29/2004
100739 EAGLE WINE
633.84
92968
921306
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
336.62
92969
921301
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
10.71-
92970
644395
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
1,450.10
93131
921298
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
590.55
93132
918295
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
3,000.40
262012
7/29/2004
100741 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
7,100.35.
92672
322636
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
83.70
92773
212503
5430.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
1,701.95
92971
322711
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
357.00
93040
13103
5421.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
GRILL
15.00
93133
322713
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/28/2004 9:27:44
Council Check Register Page - 8
7/29/2004 -7/2912004
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
4,354.45
93134
322712
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
10.70
93135
322731
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
6,850.95
93136
322730
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
20,474.10
262013
7129/2004
106467 EDINA CRIME PREVENTION FUND
2,210.00
ART FAIR VISA CHARGES
92734
072004
5101.4607
CLASS REGISTRATION
ART CENTER REVENUES
2,210.00
262014
7129/2004
101341 EDINA FIREFIGHTER'S RELIEF ASS
131.68
CABLE INSTALLATION FEE
92819
072004
1470.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
131.68
262015
712912004
100734 EDWARD KRAEMER & SONS INC.
587.36
GRAVEL
9.2820
150751
5422.6517
SAND GRAVEL & ROCK
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
587.36
262016
712912004
116448 EGAN OIL COMPANY
231.30
GOLF CAR FUEL
92821
84827
5423.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GOLF CARS
444.69
GAS
92822
84826
5422.6581
GASOLINE
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
186.45
GOLF CAR FUEL
92823
82367
5423.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GOLF CARS
369.60
GAS
92824
82366
5422.6581
GASOLINE
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
1,232.04
262017
712912004
105944 EMANUEL, LOU
311.50
SOFTBALL OFFICIATING
92912
072304
4077.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
311.50
262018
712912004
102379 EPA AUDIO VISUAL INC.
87.04
BATTERY PACK
93041
154277
5125.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MEDIA STUDIO
87.04
262019.
712912004
112704 FESLER, EDDI
68.50
GALLERY OPENING ITEMS
93087
071904
5120.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP
68.50
262020
712912004
105420 FIXES SERVICES
34.08
AIR DEODORIZERS
92774
46719
5841.6162
SERVICES CUSTODIANS
YORK OCCUPANCY.
34.08
262021
7/29/2004
108501 FIRE -END & CROKER CORP.
670.34
ADAPTERS
92825
105517
'470.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
CITY OF EDINA
7/28/2..- . 9:27:44
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 9 .
7/29/2004
—7/29/2004
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
670.34
262022
712912004
101476 FOOTJOY
129.71
MERCHANDISE
93042
5947664
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
54.85
SHOES
93043
5947199
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
184.56
262023
7129/2004
105699 FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE CO.
7,602.24
DENTAL PREMIUMS
93119
072604
1550.6040
HOSPITALIZATION
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
7,602.24
262024
712912004
101022 FRAME, SUSAN
1,850.00
INSTRUCTOR AC.
93088
071904.
5110.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
1,850.00
262026
7/2912004.
103039 FREY, MICHAEL
1,620.00
INSTRUCTOR AC
93089
071904
5110.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
1,620.00
262026
7129/2004
100767 GARDNER HARDWARE COMPANY
158.69
DOOR CLOSURE
92826
0341997
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
158.69
262027
712912004
100773 GENERAL PARTS INC.
42.40
SWITCH
92913
615751
5311.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES -
POOL OPERATION
42.40
262028
7/29/2004
104119 GILBERTSON, BRIAN
150.00
PERFORMANCE 8/3/04
92914
072304
5610.6136
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER
ED ADMINISTRATION
150.00
262029
7/29/2004
101146 GLOBAL CROSSING TELECOMMUNICAT
218,39
92737
071404
1550.6188
TELEPHONE
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
218.39
262030
712912004
101679 GOLFCRAFT
245.00
GOLF CLUBS
93044
17909
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
245.00
262031
712912004
100780 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL INC.
1,201.75
JUNE SERVICE
93045
4060304
5913.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
DISTRIBUTION
1,201.75
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check # Date Amount
262032 712912004
233.03
46.54
166.30
115.50
561.37
262033 7129/2004
Vendor / Explanation
101103 GRAINGER
LIGHTS
CORKBOARD
PAINT, BRUSHES
DOOR CLOSER
102670 GRAND PERE WINES INC
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
TELEPHONE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
REPAIR PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PROFESSIONAL SVCS - GOLF
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
7/28/2004 9:27:44
Page - 10
Business Unit
POOL OPERATION
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
YORK SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
VERNON SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK OCCUPANCY
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
TRAFFIC SIGNALS
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
CITY OF EDINA
990.20
Council Check Register
14132
5842.5513
7/29/2004 - 7/29/2004
PO # Doc No
Inv No Account No
Subledger Account Description
92738
498- 723752 -8 5311.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
92827
495- 340020 -9 5422.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
92828
495 - 506071 -2 1553.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
93046
495 - 645917 -8 5410.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
TELEPHONE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
REPAIR PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PROFESSIONAL SVCS - GOLF
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
7/28/2004 9:27:44
Page - 10
Business Unit
POOL OPERATION
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
YORK SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
VERNON SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK OCCUPANCY
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
TRAFFIC SIGNALS
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
990.20
93137
14132
5842.5513
990.20
262034
7/2912004
102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC
1,018.00
92972
65651
5822.5513
388.00
92973
65652
5862.5513
257.00
93138
65699
5842.5513
1,663.00
262036
7/29/2004
101618 GRAUSAM, STEVE
67.45
CELL PHONE CHARGES
92739
072004
5841.6188
67.45
262036
7/29/2004
100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC.
14.17
SCOTCHKOTE, NAIL STRAP
92829
902598907
1646.6406
31.06
SCOTCHKOTE, NAIL STRAP
92829
902598907
1322.6406
26.11
WIRE, SPLICING TAPE
92830
902598898
1322.6530
377.90
WIRE, SPLICING TAPE
92830
902598898
.1330.6530
449.24
262037
7/29/2004
102125 GREG LESSMAN SALES
411.65
GOLF BALLS
92775
28550
5440.5511
411.65
262038
7/29/2004
100786 GREUPNER, JOE
5,003.64
GROUP LESSONS
92831
071904
5410.6132
5,003.64
262040
7/2912004
100782 GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
7,862.70
92673
911248
5842.5512
6,129.75
92674
911808
5842.5512
6,176.50-
92675
643584
5842.5512
66.80-
92676
643719
'942.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
TELEPHONE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
REPAIR PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PROFESSIONAL SVCS - GOLF
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
7/28/2004 9:27:44
Page - 10
Business Unit
POOL OPERATION
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
YORK SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
VERNON SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK OCCUPANCY
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
TRAFFIC SIGNALS
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
CITY OF EDINA
7/281. 9:27:44
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 11
7/29/2004
- 7/29/2004
Check # Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
21.25-
92677
643536
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
85.44-
92678
643535
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE.
50TH ST SELLING
20.60-
92679
643537
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
8.58-
92680
643531
5862.5512
COST OF-GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
173.60-
92681
643699
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
170.54-
92682
643532
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
4,857.27
92974
921310
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
33.85
92975
921307
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
74.14
92976
921309
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING .
309.09
92977
921311
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
1.70
92978
921218
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
2,628.60
92979
921202
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
3,281.38
92980
921300
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
932.25
92981
921201
.5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
1,808.91
92982
921303
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
34.10
92983
921304
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
75.31-
92984
644144
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
50.40-
92985
643557
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
26.53-
92986
643558
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
216.70-
92987
643700
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
148.80-
93139
644105
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
25.00-
93140
644469
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
92.40-
93141
643958
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
20,595.29
262041 7/29/2004
104858 HALPERIN- EATON, TERRI
420.00
REIMBURSE AIRFARE
93090
071904
5110.6564
CRAFT SUPPLIES
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
540.00
INSTRUCTOR AC
93090
071904
5110.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
960.00
262042 7/29/2004
101576 HEGGIES PIZZA
144.70
PIZZA
93047
114230
5421.5510.
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
144.70
262043 , 712912004
101209 HEIMARK FOODS
334.40
MEAT PATTIES
93048
017715
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
334.40
262044 7/29/2004
106436 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATION
.
385.20
RADIO LEASE
92832
24068009
1470.6151
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
385.20
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
7/29/2004 - 7/29/2004
Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
262046 7/29/2004 104332 HILL, PRISCILLA
940.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 93091 071904 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
940.00
262046 712912004 104376 HOHENSTEINS INC.
7/28/2004 9:27:44
Page - 12
Business Unit
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
472.50
92683
. 335608
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
635.45
92684
336168
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
1,107.95
262047 7/29/2004 106461 ROLL, SHELLEY
SOFTBALL OFFICIATING
92915
072304
4077.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
65.89 REIMBURSEMENT
93092
071904
5110.6564
CRAFT SUPPLIES
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
285.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTOR
93092
071904
5125.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
MEDIA STUDIO
EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
TREES 8 MAINTENANCE
POOL CONCESSIONS
POOL CONCESSIONS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
4,704.28
92685
350.89
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
83.90
92686
262048
712912004
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
116443 HOLMES, CARTER
133.50
SOFTBALL OFFICIATING
92915
072304
4077.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
133.50
262049
7/29/2004
101774 HONEYWELL INC.
1,119.11
REPAIR MICROCEL
92916
785112
5511.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
1,119.11
262050
712912004
100808 HORWATH, THOMAS
354.75
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
92776
071904
1644.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
354.75
262061
7129/2004
112628 ICEE COMPANY, THE
32.00
CONCESSION PRODUCT
92740
032546
5320.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
2,552.00
CONCESSION PRODUCT
93050
063091
5320.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
2,584.00
262062
7/2912004
100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP.
49.84
PLASTIC SHEET
92741
353556
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
49.84
262063
712912004
100818 INTERSTATE COMPANIES INC.
166.65
OIL FILTERS
92833
00138903
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
166.65
262056
7/29/2004
100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO.
EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
TREES 8 MAINTENANCE
POOL CONCESSIONS
POOL CONCESSIONS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
4,704.28
92685
1752163
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
83.90
92686
1752160
"862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
CITY OF EDINA
7/28/2004" 9:27:44
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 13
7/29/2004
-7/29/2004
Check # Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
351.65
92687
1752162
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
862.06
92688
1752161
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
2.03-
92689
254400
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
11.64-
92690
.254401
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
14.55-
92691
255295
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
226.30-
92692
254657
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
2,121.86
92988
1755226
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
100.90
92989
1755222
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
2.42-
92990
255554
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
8.08-
92991
255555
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
112.15-
92992
255847
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
166.40-
92993
255625
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
1,782.15
93142
1755217
.5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
642.07
93143
1755210
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
1,344.62
93144
1755219
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
1,838.41
93145
1755218
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
181.80
93146
1755216
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
35.15
93147
1755221
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
4,371.12
93148
1755220
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
25.70-
93149
255624
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
1,345.30
93150
1752165
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
201.07
93151
1755213
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
471,77
93152
1755212
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
1,069.37
93153
1755214
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
275.70
93154
1755208
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
1,050.56
93155
1755209
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
70.30
93156
1755215
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
23.90-
93157
255553
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING .
57.70-
93158
255552
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
31.20-
93159
255551
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
22,221.97
262056 7129/2004
103664 JOHNSON, DENISE
90.00
INSTRUCTOR AC
93093
071904
5110.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
90.00
262067 7/29/2004
100919 JOHNSON, NAOMI
12.40
PETTY CASH
92777
072104
5110.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
18.53
PETTY CASH
92777
072104
5125.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MEDIA STUDIO
22.75
PETTY CASH
92777
072104
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
30.97
PETTY CASH
92777
072104
5110.6513
OFFICE SUPPLIES
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
42.61
PETTY CASH
92777
072104
5111.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
7/28/2004 9:27:44
Council Check Register
Page - 14
7/29/2004
- 7/29/2004
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
49.62
PETTY CASH
92777
072104
5125.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MEDIA STUDIO
52.19
PETTY CASH
92777
072104
5111.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT
71.06
PETTY CASH
92777
072104
5120.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP
86.28
PETTY CASH
92777
072104
5110.6564
CRAFT SUPPLIES
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
386.41
262068
7129/2004
102603 JONAS, LENORE
280.00
INSTRUCTOR AC
93094
071904
5110.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
280.00
262069
7/29/2004
103449 KAMPA, TINA
32.73
PLAYGROUND SUPPLIES
92742
072004
1624.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PLAYGROUND & THEATER
200.25
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
92917
072204
1624.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
PLAYGROUND & THEATER.
232.98
262060
7129/2004
104369 KARKHOFF, NANCY
55.94
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
92918
072204
1400.6203
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
55.94
262061
712912004
111018 KEEPRS INC. / CY S UNIFORMS
95.95
SHOES
92834
25947
1470.6558
DEPT UNIFORMS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
95.95
262062
712912004
114276 KELLEHER, KEVIN
8.39
DISPOSABLE CUPS
93049
072204
7411.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PSTF OCCUPANCY
426.00
LENS COVERS
93049
072204
7411.6530
REPAIR PARTS
PSTF OCCUPANCY
434.39
262063
7/29/2004
106171 KEYS WELL DRILLING CO.
6,910.00
NEW WELL MOTOR
92778
2004095
05423.1705.30
CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS
WELL #14 REHAB 6367 DEWEY HILL
6,910.00
262064
7/29/2004
102101 KINKO'S
39.41
NEWSLETTER
92779
062200049672.
5410.6575
PRINTING
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
39.41
262066
7129/2004
101340 KOCHENASH, RICK
675.00
INSTRUCTOR AC
93096
071904
5110.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
675.00
262066
712912004
112618 KOLLMER CONSULTANTS INC.
1,496.00
REPAIRS, INSPECTION
92835
1135
'914.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
TANKS TOWERS.& RE`' "'` /OIR
CITY OF EDINA
7/28/k,-, 9:27:44
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 15
7/29/2004
- 7/29/2004
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
1,496.00
262067
7/2912004
100846 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO
14.00
92693
406617
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
1,142.45
92694
406616
5822.5514.
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
2,284.25
92695
406775
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
242.00
93160
407438
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
70.00
93161
407437
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
3,757.70
262068
7/29/2004
116776 KUSTOM KARRIERS
249.30
TOW BILL
93116
072604
4601.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
POLICE FORFEITURE
249.30
262069
7129/2004
116772 LAUDER, MICHAEL
106.00
MODEL
93097
071904
5110.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
108.00
262070
712912004
100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC.
52.71
GRINDING WHEEL
92743
2206345
1325.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
STREET NAME SIGNS
148.49
SCREWS, WASHERS, NUTS
92744
2211062
1553.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
295.27
CABLE TIES, PLUGS, GASKETS
92836
2192971
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
496.47
262071
7/2912004
100863 LEEF SERVICES
29.56
SHOP TOWELS
92837
214783
5422.6201
LAUNDRY
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
29.56
262072
7/2912004
100855 LESCO INC.
281.48
TURF PAINT
92838
9RFYW1
5422.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
281.48
262073
712912004
116760 LITTLE LEAGUE BASEBALL ALL -STA
95.00
PROGRAM BOOK AD
92839
061004
5210.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
GOLF DOME PROGRAM
95.00
262074
7/2912004
106235. LITTLE, LAURA
26.43
PLAYGROUND SUPPLIES
92745
072004
1624.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PLAYGROUND & THEATER
26.43
262075
712912004
106449 LONG, DIANE
320.00
PT MAINTENANCE
93098
071904
5111.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
7/28/2004 9:27:44
Council Check Register
Page - 16
.7/29/2004
- 7/29/2004
Check # Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
320.00
262076 7/29/2004
112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP
350.54
CANDY
92746
163269
5320.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
POOL CONCESSIONS
350.54
262077 7/29/2004
103286 M.T.O.A.
2,110.00
REGISTRATION FEE
92932
072304
1400.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
2,110.00
262078 712912004
105680 MAAS, STACY
38.72
PETTY CASH
92919
072104
5610.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ED ADMINISTRATION
53.80
PETTY CASH
92919
072104
5630.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTENNIAL LAKES
92.52
262079 7/29/2004
100864 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC.
56.52
CLOSURE SEALS
92840
2044764
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
31.69
CLOSURE SEAL
92841
2044976
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
363.17
COUNTER, HORN, PLUG
92842
2044668
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
451.38
262080 712912004
100868 MARK VII SALES
37.30
92696
691419
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
1,938.15
92697
691418
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
1,973.00
92698
688966
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SO&BEER
VERNON SELLING
209.25
92699
689222
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
3,465.40
92700
691615
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
622.35
92701
689221
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
1,350.30
92702
691869
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
.03
92703
688965
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
91.90
92704
688967
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
107.50
92705
691630
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
45.95
92706
691616
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
4,062.45
92794
691895
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
59.25
92795
691896
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
1,494.90
93162
694027
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
37.30
93163
694028
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
15,495.03
262081 7/29/2004
116756 MARKETING BY VIDEO
600.00
ADVERTISING
92780
10902
5410.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
600.00
7/28/k, 9:27:44
Page - 17
Business Unit
LIQUOR INSPECTION
ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP
AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET
AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
GOLF ADMINISTRATION .
CENTENNIAL LAKES
CENTENNIAL LAKES
CENTENNIAL LAKES
CITY OF EDINA
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
7/29/2004
-7/29/2004
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doe No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
262082
712912004
116766 MARSTON, ELIZABETH
63.75
ALCOHOL DECOY
92920
072004
1424.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
63.75
262083
712912004
101030 MATHISON CO.
31.85
CHARCOAL PAPER
93051
571983 -0
5120.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
31.85
262084
7129/2004
104268 MCGARRY, JOANNE
2.44
REFUND
92747
072304
5300.2039
SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE
37.56
REFUND
92747
072304
5301.4532
SEASON TICKETS
40.00
262086
7/29/2004
103189 MEDICA
83,959.79
HIGH OPTION
92724
104214102386
1550.6040
HOSPITALIZATION
83,959.79
262086
7129/2004
103189 MEDICA
56,049.41
ELECT OPTION
92725
104214125472
1550.6040
HOSPITALIZATION
56,049.41
262087
7129/2004
103189 MEDICA
4,166.41
SELECT OPTION
92726
104214134271
1550.6040
HOSPITALIZATION
4,166.41
262088
7/2912004
103189 MEDICA
1,001.61
LOW OPTION
92727
104214122552
1550.6040
HOSPITALIZATION
1,001.61
262089
712912004
101483 MENARDS
153.34
WINDOWS
92843
42075
5422.6577
LUMBER
.475.78
PUSH LAWNMOWERS
92844
43672
5422.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
60.73
TIMBER WALL
92845
44341
5422.6577
LUMBER
73.05
LUMBER, CHAINLINK
92846
41608
1301.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
89.08
FLAGS
93052
44639
5410.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
851.98
262090
712912004
101987 MENARDS
264.12
SUMP PUMPS
92921
3789
5630.6530
REPAIR PARTS
135.51
BRUSHES, PAINT, SUPPLIES
92922
3404
5630.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
80.88
ROUND -UP
92923
5641
5630.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
7/28/k, 9:27:44
Page - 17
Business Unit
LIQUOR INSPECTION
ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP
AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET
AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
GOLF ADMINISTRATION .
CENTENNIAL LAKES
CENTENNIAL LAKES
CENTENNIAL LAKES
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
7/28/2004 9:27:44
Council Check Register
Page - 18
7/2912004
.-7129/2004
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No -
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
101.80
SCOTCHGUARD
92924
1578
5620.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH PARK
582.31
262091
7129/2004
100882 MERIT SUPPLY
400.33
CLEANING SUPPLIES
92847
64839
1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
93.72
GLASS CLEANER
92848
64863
1552.6511
CLEANING SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
1,096.63
LINERS, CLEANERS
92925
64924
5511.6511
CLEANING SUPPLIES
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
222.48
CLEANERS
92926
64869
5620.6511
CLEANING SUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH PARK
1,813.16
262092
7129/2004
100410 METROCALL
322.17
PAGERS
92927
01662548 -1
1400.6151
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
322.17
262093
7129/2004
100892 MIDWEST BADGE 8 NOVELTY CO. IN
33.45
ROSETTES, RIBBONS
93053
108538
5120.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP
33.45
262094
712912004
100692 MIDWEST COCA -COLA EAGAN
79.80
92707
82513091
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
79.80
262096
7/2912004
103186 MIDWEST FUELS
270.12
FUEL
92849
22050
5422.6581
GASOLINE
MAINT OF.000RSE 8 GROUNDS
279.71
FUEL
92850
10195
5422.6581
GASOLINE -
MAINT OF COURSE 8 GROUNDS
549.83
262096
712912004
101260 MIDWEST LIGHTING PRODUCTS
1,348.56
LIGHT POLE
92748
00038815
1322.6530
REPAIR PARTS
STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
1,348.56
LIGHT POLE
92851
00038814
1322.6530
REPAIR PARTS
STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
2,697.12
262097
712912004
101890 MIDWEST VENDING INC
283.24
CANDY
93054
3133
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
283.24
262098
712912004
116770 MINNEAPOLIS.FIRE DEPARTMENT
300.00
METHANE USE
93055
072204
7411.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PSTF OCCUPANCY
300.00
262099
7129/2004
102386 MINNEAPOLIS POLICE CONCERT BAN
100.00
PERFORMANCE 8/1/04
92928
072304
- 610.6136
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER
ED ADMINISTRATION
CITY OF EDINA
7/28/20u4 9:27:44
RSSCKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page- - 19
7/29/2004
- 7/2912004
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
100.00
262100
712912004
116758 MINNEAPOLIS RETAIL MEAT CUTTER
239.20
AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT -
92781
072104
1470.4329
AMBULANCE FEES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
239.20
262101
7/29/2004
102014 MINNESOTA CLAY USA
72.67
UNDERGLAZE
93056
32226
5110.6564
CRAFT SUPPLIES
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION -
72.67
262102
7/29/2004
104856 MINNESOTA PGA
20.00
SCORESHEETS
92782
071504
5410.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
20.00
262103
7129/2004
103404 MINNESOTA PREVENTION RESOURCE
100.00
MPRC CONFERENCE
92929
C009858
1490.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
PUBLIC HEALTH
100.00
262104
7/29/2004
101779 MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATIO
240.00
CRIMINAL JUSTICE VIDEO
92930
INV146416
1400.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
240.00
262106
712912004
115082 MOLDOW, GAY
142.60
GALLERY OPENING FOOD
93099
071904
5120.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP
142.60
262106
7/29/2004
116757 MONGA, TRILOK
490.70
AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT
92783
072104
1470.4329
AMBULANCE FEES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
490.70
262107
7/29/2004
100159 MOOERS PRINTING INC.
255.60
ENVELOPES
92852
3633
1470.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
255.60
262108
7/2912004
102395 MOSE, WILLIAM
534.00
SOFTBALL OFFICIATING
92931
072304
4077.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
534.00
262109
7/29/2004
100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC.
170.44
CLOCK MOTOR
92853
421912 -00
5422.6611
IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
436.65
ROLLER
92854
416859 -04
5422.6530
REPAIR PARTS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
162.95
OSMAC TRIAC BOARD
92855
421911 -00
5422.6611.
IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
7/28/2004 9:27:44
Council Check Register
Page - 20
7129/2004
- 7/29/2004
Check # Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
58.98
SEAL KITS
92856
418998 -00
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
66.81
HUB, PLATE, BEARINGS
92857
419042 -00
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
564.44-
CREDIT
92858
419257 -00
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
331.39
262110 7129/2004
114343 MULLEN, JANET
554.00
INSTRUCTOR AC
93100
071904
5110.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
554.00
262111 7/2912004
101727 NELSON, BARBARA
396.00
MEDIA INSTRUCTOR
93101
071904
5125.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
MEDIA STUDIO
396.00
262112 7/29/2004
100922 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS
1,022.41
SIGN BLANKS, SIGNS
92859
TI- 0125746
1325.6531
SIGNS 8 POSTS
STREET NAME SIGNS
1,022.41
262113 7/29/2004
104672 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS
30.57
92749
873184124019
1325.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
STREET NAME SIGNS
36.29
92749
873184124019
1553.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
54.75
92749
873184124019
4090.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
STREET REVOLVING
121.73
92749
873184124019
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
125.16
92749
873184124019
1301.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
180.95
92749
873184124019
1322.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
193.88
92749
873184124019
1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
220.76
92749
873184124019
1260.6188
TELEPHONE
ENGINEERING GENERAL
668.71
92749
873184124019
5911.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER
263.75
92933
425483229-014
5620.6230
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT
EDINBOROUGH PARK
1,896.55
262114 7/29/2004
116480 NSITE MYSTERY SHOPPING
90.00
SHOPPING SERVICE
92934
1011
5822.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
50TH ST SELLING
90.00
SHOPPING SERVICE
92934
1011
5842.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
YORK SELLING
90.00
SHOPPING SERVICE
92934
1611
5862.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
VERNON SELLING
270.00
262116 7/29/2004
100936 OLSEN COMPANIES
30.80
TIE DOWNS
92860
289803
1553.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
30.80
262116 7/29/2004
102620 ORIENTAL TRADING COMPANY INC.
46.80
CANVAS TOTE BAGS
93057
592516728-01
'10.6564
CRAFT SUPPLIES
ART CENTER ADMINI`' -SON
CITY OF EDINA
7/28/21,. J27:44
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check
Register
Page - 21
7/29/2004
- 7/29/2004
Check # Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
46.80
262117 7129/2004
116754 ORPHEUM THEATRE
699.60
APR 30 LION KING
92784
DEPOSIT
1628.6103.07
TRIPS PROF SERVICES
SENIOR CITIZENS
699.60
262118 712912004
100939 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC.
94.64
COOKIES
93058
70552243
5320.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
POOL CONCESSIONS
194.48
COOKIES
93059
68489243
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
289.12
262119 712912004
102440 PASS, GRACE
620.00
INSTRUCTOR AC
93102
071904
5110.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
620.00
262120 7/29/2004
100347 PAUSTIS & SONS
119.70
92708
8041417 -IN
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
192.00
92709
8041416 -IN
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
942.40
92994
8042037 -IN
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
199.50
92995
8042039 -IN
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
1,163.76
92996
8042038 -IN
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
855.80
92997
8042035 -IN
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
79.80
93164
8041893 -IN
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS. SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
3,552.96
262121 712912004
101565 PENN CYCLE
23.42
POLICE DEPT
92935
072204
1400.6203
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
289.51
POLICE DEPT
92935
072204
1400.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
336.59
POLICE DEPT
92935.
072204
1400.6215
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL -
649.52
262122 7/29/2004
100946 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY
528.10
92750
.65269506
5630.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
CENTENNIAL LAKES
153.50
92785
66384694
5320.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
POOL CONCESSIONS
1,174.65
92786
64058203
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
365.90
92787
63806889
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
339.60
92936
65269620
5630.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
CENTENNIAL LAKES
138,80
92998
63814118
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
191,10
93060
65269616
5430.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
2,891.65
262123 7/29/2004
100948 PERKINS LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
7/29/2004 -7/29/2004
Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No
2,465.00 LANDSCAPE WATERTOWER SITE 93061 072004 05413.1705.30
1,275.00 LANDSCAPE NORMANDALE RD SITE 93062 7/20/04 5913.6180
3,740.00
Subledger Account Description
CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
7/28/2004 _9:27:44
Page- 22 .
Business Unit
WATER TREATMENT PLANT #2
DISTRIBUTION
262124 7129/2004
100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
841.55
92710
2092243
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
408.50
92711
2092826
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
310.57
92712
2092245
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
12.51-
92713
3301588
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
161.45
92999
2094553
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
125.10
93000
2094547
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
5.25-
93001
3301587
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
804.30
93165
2094546
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
847.00
93166
2094548
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
80.90
93167
2094549
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
5,058.75
93168
2094551
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
1,123.00
93169
2094552
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
1,031.40
93170
2094550
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
65.60-
93171
3301807 -
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
10,709.16
262126 7/2912004
102166 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING
272.41
92714
44231
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
727.23
92715
43882
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
637.57
92716
44246
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
758.03
92717
44287
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX .
VERNON SELLING
8.08
CANDY
92751
44247
5841.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
YORK OCCUPANCY
8.08
CANDY
92752
43819
5841.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
YORK OCCUPANCY
239.80
93172
44618
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
230.15
93173
44615
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
333.30
93174
44617
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
609.13
93175
44587
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
3,823.78
262126 7129/2004
100961 POSTMASTER
1,300.00
POSTAGE
93103
071904
5110.6235
POSTAGE
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
1,300.00
262127 712912004
105055 POWDERHORN NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOC.
90.00
PROGRAM AD
93063
PRG008
5110.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
90.00
CITY OF EDINA
7/28/2004 9:27:44
RSSCKREG . LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - '23
7/29/2004
- 7/29/2004
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
262128
7/2912004
106072 PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC.
660.94
SPECIAL FLOWER MIX
92861
92273
5422.6543
SOD & BLACK DIRT
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
660.94
262129
7/2912004
100964 PRECISION TURF & CHEMICAL
155.76
ANT CONTROL
92862
23314
5422.6545
CHEMICALS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
155.76
262130
7/2912004
114516 PRESS PUBLICATIONS
350.00
ADVERTISING
93064
298870
5110.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
350.00
262131
7129/2004
104424 PRIEDE, SOREN
288.00
INSTRUCTOR AC
93104
071904
5110.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
288.00
262132
712912004
100966 PRINTERS SERVICE INC
102.00
BLADE SHARPENING
92937
204356
5521.6215
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
ARENA ICE MAINT
102.00
262133
712912004
100968 PRIOR WINE COMPANY
542.33
93002
921302
5822.5513
COST OF. GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
909,21
93003
921308
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
15.31-
93004
644021
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
1,003.82
93176
921299
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
2,440.05
262134
7/2912004
106690 PRO -TEC DESIGN INC.
131.00
OPEN HOUSE PROGRAMMING
92938
45269
1551.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
CITY HALL GENERAL
294.75
REMOVE & REINSTALL CAMERA
92939
45266
1551.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
CITY HALL GENERAL
425.75
262135
712912004
106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY
311.33
SOAP, LINERS, ROLL TOWEL
92940
3340
5620.6511
CLEANING SUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH PARK
311.33
262136
7129/2004
104669 PURE BLUE
198.00
HYDROSPEX, FLEXFRAMES
92941
17840
5310.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
POOL ADMINISTRATION
198.00
262139
7/2912004
100971 QUALITY WINE
32.36 -
93005
430325 -00
5840.5518
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check # Date
Amount Vendor / Explanation
1,632.93
15.27-
1,542.26
12.70-
1,282.73
19.61-
1,989.38
24.73-
1,249.57
11.26-
570.35
1.68-
170.76
23.77-
1,201.27
6.08-
616.25
96.95
7.99 -
9.85-
996.09
11,183.24
262140 712912004 101966 OWEST
107.16 952 451 -6058 92863 071004 1400.6188
107.16
262141 7/2912004 100287 RAMSEY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPART
200.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 93118 072604 1000.2055
200.00
262142 712912004
CITY OF
EDINA
4077.6103
63.75
Council Check Register
92942
072004
7/29/2004
- 7/2912004
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
93005
430325 -00
5842.5512
SOFTBALL OFFICIATING
93006
429447 -00
5860.5518
93006
429447 -00
5862.5513
100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO.
93007
430532 -00
5860.5518
SOFTENER SALT
93007
430532 -00
5862.5513
SOFTENER SALT
93008
430555 -00
5840.5518
93008
430555 -00
5842.5513
93009
427840 -00
5860.5518
93009
427840 -00
5862.5512
93010
430326 -00
5860.5518
93010
430326 -00
5862.5512
93011
430295 -00
5860.5518
93011
430295-00
5862.5513
93012
430329 -00
5820.5518
93012
430329 -00
5822.5512
93013
430533 -00
5820.5518
93013
430533 -00
5822.5513
93014
430489-00
5842.5514
93015
428964 -00
5862.5513
93177
430488 -00
5840.5518
93177
430488 -00
5842.5513
262140 712912004 101966 OWEST
107.16 952 451 -6058 92863 071004 1400.6188
107.16
262141 7/2912004 100287 RAMSEY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPART
200.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 93118 072604 1000.2055
200.00
262142 712912004
116764 RASSCHAERT, CARLI
LIQUOR INSPECTION
4077.6103
63.75
ALCOHOL DECOY
92942
072004
63.75
470.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERA'
262143 7/2912004
102631. REAMER, MARK
890.00
SOFTBALL OFFICIATING
92943
072204
890.00
262144 7/2912004
100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO.
52.72
SOFTENER SALT
92864
00151388
17.57.
SOFTENER SALT
92865
00151357
Subledger Account Description
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VENDOR DISCOUNTS
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
7/28/2004 9:27:44
Page- 24
Business Unit
YORK SELLING
VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
VERNON SELLING
VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
VERNON SELLING
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
YORK SELLING
VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
VERNON SELLING
VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
VERNON SELLING
VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
VERNON SELLING
50TH STREET GENERAL
50TH ST SELLING
50TH STREET GENERAL
50TH ST SELLING
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
YORK SELLING
TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET
1424.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
LIQUOR INSPECTION
4077.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
1470.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
470.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERA'
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor! Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
i3usmess unit
70.29
262145
7/29/2004
100982 ROTO - ROOTER
125.00
DRAIN CLEANING
92944
04810411825
5620.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
EDINBOROUGH PARK
125.00
262146
7/29/2004
100985 RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON EQ CO INC
45.08
HINGE
92866
C35332
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN -
45.08
262147
712912004
101232 SALUD AMERICA
838.00
92721
610A
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
838.00
262146
7/29/2004
101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT
26.64
101- 26373069350
92945
072204
1623.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
TENNIS INSTRUCTION
51.19
101- 26373069350
92945
072204
4075.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
VANVALKENBURG
77.83
262149
712912004
103859 SANDBERG, MARY
54.00
MODEL
93105
071904
5110.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES .
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
54.00
262150
7/29/2004
100896 SBC PAGING
151.56
PAGERS
92946
30343007040
5620.6230
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT
EDINBOROUGH PARK
151.56
262151
712912004
100990 SCHARBER & SONS
22.84
RELAY, SWITCH, DIODE
92867
319051
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
22.84
262162
7/29/2004
116773 SCHMITT, BOB
450.00
INSTRUCTOR AC
93106
071904
5110.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
450.00
262153
712912004
116761 SCHOENBAUER, TROY
-
630.00
REMOVAL OF BOULDERS
92868
070304
5431.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE
630.00
262164
7/2912004
116762 SCHOENFELDER PAINTING INC.
2,450.00
EXTERIOR PAINTING
92869
B161
1375.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PARKING RAMP
2,450.00
R55CKREG LOG20000
FERTILIZER
92753
401252SI
CITY OF EDINA
FERTILIZER
FIELD MAINTENANCE
386.06
Council Check Register
262162 7/2912004
106403 SOUND CLIPS INC.
7/29/2004
- 7/29/2004
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
262165
7/29/2004
101970 SCOTT COUNTY_ NURSERY INC
262163 712912004
101002 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS INC
692.25
MULCH
92870
43891
5422.6517
SAND GRAVEL & ROCK
152551
5842.5515
692.25
YORK SELLING.::
6,270.10
92797
152550
262156
7/2912004
YORK SELLING
116769 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES
92798
152545
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING ".
275.59
CALIBRATION METHANE
93065
1 -0664
7411.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
50TH ST SELLING
84.40
275.59
93066
346755
5430.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
RICHARDS GOLF-COURSE
262157
712912004
105650 SCRAP METAL PROCESSORS INC.
262164 7/291200/
110977 SOW, ADAMA
150.00
CONTAINER RENTAL
92871
D- COE4 -7
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
150.00
262158
7/2912004
104251 SHANNON, IDELLE
30.00
SOUND SYSTEM COVER
92947
099991
5620.6406
GENERAL S_ UPPLIES
30.00
262159
7/29/2004
106002 SHOEMAKER, JAMI
54.00
MODEL
93107
071904
5110.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
54.00
262160
712912004
116775 SIMONSON, MITCHELL
24.36
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
93115
072604
1190.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE.
24.36
262161
7/2912004
100301 SIMPLOT PARTNERS
7/28/2004 9:27:44
Page - 26
Business Unit
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
PSTF OCCUPANCY
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
EDINBOROUGH PARK
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
ASSESSING
386.06
FERTILIZER
92753
401252SI
1642.6540
FERTILIZER
FIELD MAINTENANCE
386.06
262162 7/2912004
106403 SOUND CLIPS INC.
31.95
BREATHALYZER VIDEO
92948
26690
1400.6405
BOOKS & PAMPHLETS
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
31.95
262163 712912004
101002 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS INC
27.10
92796
152551
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD'MIX
YORK SELLING.::
6,270.10
92797
152550
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER ." :-
YORK SELLING
909.95
92798
152545
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING ".
27.10
92799
152546
5622.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
84.40
93066
346755
5430.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
RICHARDS GOLF-COURSE
7,318.65
262164 7/291200/
110977 SOW, ADAMA
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
7/29/2004 —7/29/2004
Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
1,638.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 93108 071904 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
7/28/2004 9:27:44
Page- 27
Business Unit
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE
CONTRACTED REPAIRS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION
REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
AUTOMOBILES & TRUCKS UTILITY BALANCE SHEET
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ED ADMINISTRATION
REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION.GEN
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
1,638.00
262166
712912004
106193 SPAIN, MARK
96.96
UNIFORM PURCHASE
92754
071904
1646.6201
1,375.00
TREE & STUMP REMOVAL
92872
072204
5422.6180
1,471.96
262166
712912004
106187 SPECTRUM SCREENPRINTING INC.
102.00
PARADE SHIRTS
93067
21563
1627.6103
195.00
PARADE SHIRTS
93068
21392
1627.6103
297.00
262167
712912004
101462 SPORT HALEY INC.
1,095.13
MERCHANDISE
92788
PSI- 018927
5440.5511
1,095.13
262168
712912004
101004 SIPS COMPANIES.
13.12
COUPLINGS
92755
S1047315.001
5913.6406
13.12
262169
7/2912004
103277 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO INC
102.07
OIL FILTERS
92873
S130161
5422.6530
95,086.40
BACKHOE. HAMMER & COMPACTOR
93019
SM08433
5900.1735
95,188.47
262170
712912004
102193 STAN BANN BIG BAND
100.00
PERFORMANCE 8/4/04
92900
072304
5610.6136
100.00
262171
7/2912004
101007 STAR TRIBUNE
210.60
ACCT 1808753
92949
070204
5610.6105
210.60
262172
7/2912004
102069 STEPP MANUFACTURING CO. INC.
69.23
HOSE
92874
28141
1553.6530
69.23
262173
7/29/2004
106452 STONE, HOLLY
320.00
INSTRUCTOR AC
93109
071904
5110.6103
320.00
7/28/2004 9:27:44
Page- 27
Business Unit
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE
CONTRACTED REPAIRS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION
REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
AUTOMOBILES & TRUCKS UTILITY BALANCE SHEET
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ED ADMINISTRATION
REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION.GEN
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
7/28/2004 9:27:44
Council Check Register
Page - 28
7/29/2004
- 7/29/2004
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
262174
712912004
102639 STROHMYER, TOM
150.00
PERFORMANCE 8/5/04
92950
072304
5610.6136
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER
ED ADMINISTRATION
150.00
262175
712912004
101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
199.44
BUMPER PACK, LATCHES
92875
345740CVW
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
70.98-
CREDIT
92676
CM345740CVW
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
268.42
DEFLECTOR, BAR, CAP
92877
345526CVW
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN -
10.89-
CREDIT
92878
CM258787CVW
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
1,936.02
REPAIRS
92879
CVCB464139
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
331.68
BUMPER PACK
92880
345152CVW
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
2,653.69
262176
712912004
101336_ SULLIVAN, MONICA
585.00
INSTRUCTOR AC
93110
071904
5110.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
585.00
262177
7/29/2004
112663 SUMMIT CUSTOM LANDSCAPE
490.00
RE- GRADE, DIRT AND SEED
92951
12291
1301.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
490.00
262178
7/29/2004
102140 SUN MOUNTAIN SPORTS INC.
21.85
MERCHANDISE
93069
491828
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
21.85
262179
7129/2004
100926 SUN TURF INC.
1,138.55
FUNGICIDE
92952
540316
5630.6540
FERTILIZER
CENTENNIAL LAKES
1,138.55
262180
7/2912004
116759 SUNDBERG COMPANY
39.80
REFRIGERATOR HANDLE
92881
8162255
1470.6530
REPAIR PARTS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
39.80
262181
7/29/2004
110674 SUPERIOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIO
35.34
CLIP CASES
92882
5736
1301.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
35.34
262182
7/29/2004
111616 T.D. ANDERSON INC.
35.00
BEERLINE CLEANING
93070
574247
5421.6230
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT
GRILL
35.00
262183
712912004
101326 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO
5630.6540 FERTILIZER
5410.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
CITY OF EDINA
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
R55CKREG LOG20000
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
262186
7/29/2004
5421.5514
101029 TESSMAN SEED 60.
Council Check Register
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD. BEER
7129/2004 - 7/29/2004
FERTILIZER
Check # Date Amount
Vendor / Explanation
PO # Doc No Inv No Account No
Subledger Account Description
43.42
FUSES
92756 60200 -00 1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
43.42
7/2912004
116482 THAYER, TIMOTHY R.
262184 712912004
112248 TERMINIX
85.00
PEST CONTROL
92757 110183 5311.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
5630.6540 FERTILIZER
5410.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
85.00
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
5421.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
262186
7/29/2004
5421.5514
101029 TESSMAN SEED 60.
5421.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD. BEER
65.90
FERTILIZER
92953
5053036 -IN
743.43
WEED
65.90
92883
826- 0305 -7/04
1643.6546
262186
7/2912004
116482 THAYER, TIMOTHY R.
211.88
CPR POCKET MASKS
93071
152
211.88
262187
7129/2004
101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
2,385.95
92722
340639
95.60
92723
340638
498.05
92789
341068
354.00
93072
13387
741.35
93073
341905
498.75
93074
341319
4,845.10
93178
341427
53.80
93179
341428
9,472.60
262188
712912004
101048 TRI COUNTY BEVERAGE & SUPPLY
72.00
92800
155991
72.00
262189
712912004
113656 TRIMARK SPORTSWEAR GROUP
52.87
PARADE SHIRTS
93075
1- 2003423
52.87
262190
7/2912004
100682 TRUGREEN- CHEMLAWN
5630.6540 FERTILIZER
5410.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
5421.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
5421.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
5421.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
5421.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD. BEER
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
1627.6103
53.25
WEED
CONTROL
92883
826-0305 -7/04
.1552.6103
58.58
WEED
CONTROL
92883
826-0305 -7/04
1470.6103
111.83,
WEED
CONTROL
92883
826-0305 -7/04
1628.6103
743.43
WEED
CONTROL
92883
826- 0305 -7/04
1643.6546
967.09
262191 712912004 101046 TURF SUPPLY COMPANY
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
WEED SPRAY
7/28/20L .9:27:44.
Page 29
Business Unit
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
POOL OPERATION
CENTENNIAL LAKES
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
GRILL
'GRILL
GRILL
GRILL
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
SPECIAL ACTIVITIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
SENIOR CITIZENS
GENERAL TURF CARE
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
7/28/2004 9:27:44
Council Check Register
Page - 30
7/29/2004
- 7/29/2004
Check # Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
99.85
CART INDICATORS
92884
094311
5422.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
99.85
262192 712912004
101047 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO
329.64
PARTS /SERVICE
92885
219270
1552.6530
REPAIR PARTS
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
329.64
262193 7/29/2004
102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO.
404.70
SEED
92886
10308
5422.6543
SOD & BLACK DIRT
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
404.70
262194 7/29/2004
100371 UNITED RENTALS
314.72
LIFT REPAIRS
92954
41521599 -001
5620.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
EDINBOROUGH PARK
314.72
262196 7/29/2004
103298 UPS STORE #1716, THE
12.61
MAILINGS
92955
070104
5910.6235
POSTAGE
GENERAL (BILLING)
45.25
MAILINGS
92955
070104
1400.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
57.86
262196 7/29/2004
101908 US FOODSERVICE INC
172.53
CLEANING PRODUCTS
92758
33191696
5311.6511
CLEANING SUPPLIES
POOL OPERATION
469.35
CONCESSION PRODUCT
92758
33191696
5320.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
POOL CONCESSIONS
584.81
CONCESSION PRODUCT
92759
33190738
5320.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
POOL CONCESSIONS
506.50
CONCESSIONS
92887
33193966
5320.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
POOL CONCESSIONS
25.56
CLEANERS
92956
33188206
5311.6511
CLEANING SUPPLIES
POOL OPERATION
85.10
CLEANERS
92957
33195148
5311.6511
CLEANING SUPPLIES
POOL OPERATION
369.19
CONCESSION PRODUCT
92957
33195148
5320.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
POOL CONCESSIONS
2,213.04
262197 7/29/2004
101058 VAN PAPER CO.
136.64
ROLL TOWEL, UTENSILS
92760
538242
1552.6511
CLEANING SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW.BUILDING
141.11
BAGS
92761
538491
5842.6512
PAPER SUPPLIES
YORK SELLING
409.60
TISSUE, ROLL TOWEL
92790
538495
5421.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GRILL
401.40
PAPER SUPPLIES
92888
538958
1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
125.35
ROLL TOWEL, TISSUE, CUPS
93076
538957
5111.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT
1,214.10
262198 712912004
101060 VANTAGE ELECTRIC
880.05
DIMMER PACK INSTALLATION
92958
17904
5620.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
EDINBOROUGH PARK
880.05
CITY OF EDINA
7/28/2004 9:27:44
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 31
7/29/2004
-7/29/2004
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
262199
712912004
102970 VERIZON WIRELESS
525.37
92959
3549675935
1400.6188
TELEPHONE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
2.93
93077
3549672408
5420.6188
TELEPHONE
CLUB HOUSE
8.49
93077
3549672408
1490.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PUBLIC HEALTH
9.39
93077
3549672408
1190.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ASSESSING
13.24
93077
3549672408
1140.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PLANNING
37.38
93077
3549672408
2210.6188
TELEPHONE
COMMUNICATIONS
88.53
93077
3549672408
1600.6188
TELEPHONE
PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
89.66
93077
3549672408
1640.6188
TELEPHONE
PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL
93.05
93077
3549672408
1470.6188
TELEPHONE
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
117.67
93077
3549672408
1120.6188
TELEPHONE
ADMINISTRATION
171.89
93077
3549672408
1495.6188
TELEPHONE
INSPECTIONS
1,157.60
262200
7/29/2004
101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC.
-
490.00
GOLF CAR RENTAL
93078
15557
5423.6216
LEASE LINES
GOLF CARS
490.00,
262201
7/29/2004
102499 VIEWPOINT INTERNATIONAL
168.15
MERCHANDISE
92791
8129806
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
168.15
262202
712912004
101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY
6.43
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
92762
8297447
1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDING. MAINTENANCE
174.32
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
92762
8297447
1301.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
289.76
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
92762
8297447
1322.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
470.51
262203
7/29/2004
101069 VOSS LIGHTING
126.84
LIGHTING
92889
2185949 -02
1322.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
511.42
LIGHTING
92890
2185949 -01
1322.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
638.26
262204
7129/2004
102886 WAGNER GREENHOUSES INC.
247.81
PLANTS
92891
110251
4090.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
STREET REVOLVING
247.81
262205
7/29/2004
101223 WALSER FORD
97.92
MIRROR ASSEMBLY
92892
113507WFOW
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
97.92
262206
7/29/2004
102342 WENZEL, KENNETH
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
7/28/2004 , 9:27:44
Council Check Register
Page - 32
7/29/2004
= 7/29/2004
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor ! Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit .
720.00
INSTRUCTOR AC
93111
071904
5110.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
720.00
262207
712912004
101077 WEST WELD SUPPLY CO.
1,493.66
HAMMER DRILL, ANGLE GRINDER
92763
63218
1301.6556
TOOLS
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
1,493.66
262208
7/2912004
116768 WET PAINT INC.
70.00
PAPER
93079
008085
5120.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP
70.00
262209
7/29/2004
104334 WHITING, SARAH.
720.00
MEDIA INSTRUCTOR
93112
071904
5125.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
MEDIA STUDIO
720.00
262210
7/29/2004
103336 WILLIAMS ARCHITECTS
3,722.69
ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES
92764
0010861
5300.1705
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET
3,722.69
262211
7/2912004
101033 WINE COMPANY, THE
644.05
93016
32100 -00
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
284.05
93017
32101 -00
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
695.60
93018
32122 -00
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
80.00-
93180
31916 -00
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
1,543.70
-
262212
712912004
101312 WINE MERCHANTS
475.15
93181
101074
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
675.80
93182
101075
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE .
YORK SELLING
275.70-
93183
21375
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
875.25
262213
7/29/2004
112964 WISCONSIN TURF EQUIPMENT CORP.
59.54
BEARING KIT, SPACERS
92893
462430
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
59.54
262214 ,
7/29/2004
101082 WITTEK GOLF,SUPPLY
191.48
GOLF BALLS, PENCILS
92960
60910
5630.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTENNIAL LAKES
191.48
262216
712912004
100691 WITTSTRUCK, MARTHA
540.00
INSTRUCTOR AC
93113
071904
5110.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register.
7/29/2004 —7/29/2004
Check # Date Amount
Vendor / Explanation PO #
Doc No Inv No Account No
Subledger Account Description
540.00
262216 7129/2004
116774 WOODLAKE NATURE CENTER
700.00
CONTRACTED STAFF
93114 072604 1624.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
700.00
262217 7/2912004
101726 XCEL ENERGY
31.94
92765 0610586055196, 1330.6185
LIGHT & POWER
31.94
536,363.78
Grand Total
Payment Instrument Totals
Check Total
536,363.78
Total Payments
536,363.78
7/28/2004 9:27:44
Page - 33
Business Unit
PLAYGROUND & THEATER
TRAFFIC SIGNALS
R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7128/2004 9:29:56
Council Cheek Summary Page - 1
7/29/2004 - 7/29/2004
Company
Amount
01000 GENERAL FUND
193,181.05
02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND
87.38
04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND
2,739.05
05100 ART CENTER FUND
24,337.37
05200 GOLF DOME FUND
95.00
05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND
10,115.23
05400 GOLF COURSE FUND
24,181.89
05500 ICE ARENA FUND
2,979.84
05600 EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND
9,363.34
05800 LIQUOR FUND
157,282.96
05900 UTILITY FUND
110,262.82
05930 STORM SEWER.FUND
420.00
07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND
1,317.85
Report Totals 536,363.78
We confirm to the best of our knowlege
and belief, that these chime
comply in all materiel respects
with the requirements of the City
of Edina purchasing policies and
procedu" .7
w91�1� MINUTES OF THE
o e Regular Meeting of the
yEdina Transportation Commission
v Thursday, June 24, 2004
Edina City Hall
4801 West 50th Street
Community Room
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Chairperson Fred Richards, Marie Thorpe, Jean White, Warren Plante, Joni
Bennett, Les Wanninger
MEMBERS ABSENT:
Dean Dovolis, Bill Skallerud
STAFF PRESENT:
Wayne Houle, Steve Lillehaug, Sharon Allison
I. Approval of Minutes from May 27, 2004
A motion was made by Bennett and seconded by Wanninger to approve the minutes of
May 27, 2004 as submitted.
II. Presentation and Review of Transportation Commission Policy Appendices
Before reviewing the Transportation Commission Policy Appendices, Bennett expressed
some concerns regarding the draft policy being developed and the timeframe in which it
is being done. Bennett stated that over the last month she researched other cities'
transportation plans and found the City of Bloomington's Plan to be very will organized.
She stated that Edina's Plan resembles Bloomington's but with fairly significant
alterations. Significant differences cited by Bennett are: Bloomington's Plan is well
established (20 years old), yet in 1997 they took a full year to review and revise their
policy. The planning process included bi- monthly meetings, tours of traffic calming
devices in other cities and simulation with a fire truck, a bus and an emergency
response vehicle. She stated that Bloomington's Commission members received
information from staff in 'bite size chunks' so that they could absorb and assimilate the
information. Staff then prepared the draft of a plan that was finally adopted.
Bennett feels that a significant amount of information that is new to her, has been
presented without a chance to fully digest, understand and give feedback on such
information. She believes some of the information is irrelevant and not functional to the
Commission, while important information is missing.
Bennett stated further, that in an attempt to fully understand what it is the Commission is
trying to address, she sent questions to staff two weeks prior to the regular scheduled
monthly meeting, but could not get a response until the time of the scheduled monthly
meeting. Bennett stated that it is her hope that Edina would do the same as
Bloomington and take a full year to develop its plan.
In response to Bennett's concerns, Richards stated that generally Edina does not
compare itself to other communities. He also reminded Bennett that at the first meeting
all Commission members agreed that individual Commission members would not go to
staff and request information on their own and if information was requested, it would be
decided upon by the Commission itself and then shared with the entire Commission.
Richards stated further that they also agreed to adopt a game plan and then move
forward. As such, the Commission will continue to review the staff prepared draft
Transportation Plan and at the end, Commission members will have the opportunity to
accept, modify or change the draft as presented.
White stated that she concurs with Bennett regarding the amount of information being
presented to them with not much time given to comprehend and respond and asked if
they would be given a chance to respond. Richards reiterated that Commission
members would have the opportunity to review fully the draft as presented or make
changes once staff has had a chance to present the draft in its entirety.
a. Appendix A — Definitions
Lillehaug said staff compiled a summary of available traffic definitions in response to a
request from Bennett.
The following are responses to other requests. Historic and forecast population figures
were taken from the Met Council's 1998 Regional blueprint accordin�to SRF, the
consultant that did the study. Increased traffic around the area of 44 and France
Avenue is based on a model that forecasts increases in employment, infill in Edina,
Minneapolis and St. Louis Park traffic and redevelopment.
In response to the list of definitions, Bennett said Bloomington's list is very short (only 5
definitions), is user friendly and fits with what the Institute of Transportation Engineers
describes. Bennett believes Edina's definitions could be more clearly defined if they
adopt Bloomington's model. She would like to spend some time discussing some of the
definitions that she believes to be in conflict with Bloomington's and materials presented
by Edina.
Houle stated that Bloomington spent the year developing a "traffic- calming plan ",
whereas Edina has adopted a "Transportation Plan" and under this broad plan is a
traffic calming policy for neighborhoods. He also stated that the definitions were taken
from the Met Council and other cities' materials. One definition that requires more
discussion, according to Houle, is 'cut- through traffic.' Wanninger stated that the
definitions serve as a source to better understanding of the materials he's reading.
b. Appendix B — Traffic Management Devices /Measures
Lillehaug stated that Appendix B is a list of all reasonable traffic management devices
available. He elaborated on four of the devices, (how they affect emergency response,
affects speed of traffic, etc.) to give a better understanding of how they work and the
different purposes they serve. The four are: Speed Hump, Speed Table (Raised
Crosswalk), Raised Intersection and Radar Speed Display Unit. Wanninger asked
about cost under the Evaluation Considerations section. Houle stated that there is a
budget for traffic management devices and the high /medium /low cost is in reference to
what it will cost the neighborhoods in assessments. Thorpe said the words 'probable'
2
and 'possible,' under Speed Reduction and Traffic Reduction seems non - committal.
Lillehaug said they are non - committal because one can never say exactly where the
speed /traffic will be reduced. White asked which emergency response team has priority
over the policy. Lillehaug said both Police and Fire will look at the policy and all
- applications will be submitted for their review and if any pose a hazard it will not be
implemented.
Houle stated he requested money to replace the current speed trailer and to also
purchase stationary ones to be installed at areas where most speeding tickets are
issued. Wanninger suggested it might be possible for a community to build up a
perception as to what the speed limit ought to be based on the traffic calming devices
they have. One consideration is the public's perception of what the community attitude
is about speeding. Thorpe said people living near speed humps might not like them
because of the noise created when speeding over them. Lillehaug said all the
information is being shared so that Commissioners can dialogue and give feedback.
White asked if there are any examples around town that they could look at. Houle said
yes, and staff could compile a list. Richards said he thought they were going to put
together a policy statement that includes all viable options without making any
judgments and have them available for use by the Commissioners and neighborhoods.
And they would not.look at examples of devices until they begin dealing with substantive
issues such as a speed bump request for a particular location. Bennett stated she does
not think the Commission should have everything without checking to see what works.
Thorpe stated that many cities do have all the traffic calming devices but it would be
good to do some research and have a list of where there are some in the city for
viewing.
Plante asked if neighbors will be bringing the issues forward, who will decide the
appropriate action to take — would it be staff or the Commission? Richards said the
Commission, staff and neighborhoods are going to make recommendations to the
Council, the decision - making body. Thorpe stated that the expertise of staff would be
relied on when considering recommendations. Bennett stated that the ordinance does
say the Commission is to make recommendations.
III. Review of Transportation Commission Policy (continued from previous
meeting)
a. Option B — Scoring for Ranking
Lillehaug said staff is recommending removing Ranking #5 because the Petition -to-
study step falls after the Ranking and Scoring step. Lillehaug provided two examples
of how the Ranking and Scoring would work using fictitious numbers. The first location,
Woodland Rd. between Concord Ave. and Wooddale Ave., is a location where a
request was made recently for a stop sign. However, Lillehaug said staff did not
recommend installing a stop sign but would be a location where a different traffic -
calming device may be appropriate. Some factors that led to Woodland receiving a
higher scoring are: its proximity to a school and having no sidewalks.
The next location, Edinborough Way, between W. 76th St. and Parklawn Ave., with a
higher traffic volume, received a lower scoring. This location is a higher density
neighborhood, has sidewalks and is adjacent to a commercial area. Lillehaug stated it
would appear that Edinborough Way should have a higher scoring because of higher
traffic volume and possibly higher speed, but this is not the case according to the
3
scoring. Woodland, being close to a school and having no sidewalks for pedestrian
traffic gives it a higher scoring.
Bennett asked staff to explain how multiple streets will be handled. Lillehaug said if five
�. petitions are received for a neighborhood they will not be studied individually because
the streets traffic volume may be linked together. Bennett believes this would create a
conflict and unfairness and suggested a better way would be to study each
neighborhood and come up with a plan. Her concern is that Edina's policy calls for a
much lower notice area, whereas Bloomington has a much higher notice area.
Lillehaug stated that staff is of the opinion that neighborhoods would not receive priority
ahead of single streets, especially when there are no sidewalks. To make it fair,
Bennett suggested linking the streets being considered and this becomes the notice
area and they would be included in the petition along with others who will be impacted.
Houle stated that this is the next step in the process. Wanninger stated he did not
understand how fairness would have an effect on the Ranking and Scoring system
since it is being established to rank different projects and prioritize them based on their
score. Bennett said this is in reference to the petition area that the policy shows as
being within 100 feet or one block of the proposed device. She said there should be
consistency between what's defined as the notice area and the area that qualifies for
Ranking and Scoring. Staff could not clearly understand Bennett's objection so
Lillehaug suggested they continue the dialogue when they begin discussion on the
benefited area.
b. Option B — Process and Schedule
Lillehaug said the schedule would need to be revised if they are going to include the
�. before data collection of step 2; which is part of the Ranking and Scoring. The initial
scoring and screening could be done in February, but data collection has to be done
when there is no snow on the ground. Also, to get a good range and effect of the
device, it should be installed before July /Aug /Sept. Bennett said Bloomington's
schedule is not as close as Edina's because their data collection is taking two weeks
instead of one month.
C
Richards suggested that if there were numerous petitions the Commission would have
to meet more than once a month. He said the Commission would adapt to the
circumstance. Bennett said they do not know what the current volume is because
they've never been presented with them. She said a policy is being designed and it's
not clear for what purpose. She said Bloomington does not require a petition study (this
is done during the application phase), which is a time saver instead of time crunch and
they use two weeks for traffic to stabilize and then measure data. Lillehaug said it
should take only two weeks to gather data. Houle said they did not use Bloomington's
petition process because if a non - traffic person passes around a petition to have
something done to a street, this could give a false sense that something is going to
happen vs. calling staff and filing an application. Staff can then look to see if it makes
sense to begin a petition process. Houle stated that past experience shows that the
petitioners may intentionally avoid some neighbors. Lillehaug said this would also give
staff some time to determine if the problem is real or perceived.
4
c. Other Policy Discussion, Comments and Recommendations
The traffic - calming devices listed on the spreadsheet will be converted to single pages
- like the examples presented and distributed prior to the next scheduled meeting. Staff
will also prepare thresholds for the effects on other neighborhoods of a petitioned area
for the potential diversion of traffic. Richards asked if staff is planning to draft a policy
statement defining who will be notified when a petition is initiated? Lillehaug said it is
listed under the benefited area.
Bennett asked why wasn't a policy drafted for collector streets like Bloomington did.
Houle said he is not familiar with Bloomington's streets, but in Edina all collector streets
are State Aid streets and the City would lose funding eligibility if we installed traffic -
calming devices on them.
Bennett asked who sought the collector street classification for Vernon Ave. Houle
indicated .he was not sure because it dates back to the 1980's. Typically, if volume
changes on a road, the County could chose to take it out (or add) it to their system,
which is what they tried to do with Vernon Ave. However, the Council passed a
resolution to not take it back. As development takes place roads are generally
reclassified to match the higher volume of traffic.
Richards asked Commissioners if there is any other information that they would like
staff to add before the revised draft policy is distributed in July. Bennett said the
majority of the draft policy concerns neighborhood traffic management and traffic
calming and the ordinance is much broader. She said it directs the Commission to
consider mass transit opportunities and pedestrian activities and there is not much that
address these issues. White and Bennett both prepared some changes for the draft
policy and copies were given to Commissioners and staff. Richards asked staff to
complete the Transportation Plan draft, including all proposed revisions to date by
Commissioners and submit the updated draft to the Commission for its review in July.
Richards then addressed the residents in attendance, asking them if they would like to
address the Commission. Addressing the Commission were:
Timothy Rudnick!, 4224 Lynn Ave. Mr. Rudnicki stated that as a citizen of Edina he is
concerned with traffic development. He said he had some difficulty finding the meeting
dates and time. He is also concerned about the process and asked if more could be
done to involve more citizens. Richards said the Commission is working on creating a
policy statement to involve citizens. Mr. Rudnicki asked if there was a statutory issue
behind the purposes of the Commission. Richards explained that the Council felt there
was a broad transportation issue that needed to be addressed based on the findings of
the Traffic Task Force and as a result, the Commission was appointed to address those
findings, among other things. The Commission felt it was necessary to create its own
policy document before addressing substantive issues. Richards said creation of the
policy document should then provide for citizen input on substantive transportation
issues.
Kristy Anderson: Ms. Anderson asked how is the policy being developed. Richards
explained that they are creating the policy with staffs assistance and then
Commissioners will go through and adopt a final policy. Richards explained that the
5
Commission is advisory in nature and as such will be making recommendations to the
Council.
Jennifer Janovy: Ms Janovy said the website is not up to date and it does not contain
accurate information. She suggested adding Commissioners' contact information
because not everyone can attend the meetings. Richards said per state law, the
public's business must be conducted in public. He does not believe discussions should
be taking place outside of the regularly scheduled meeting time. He said if individuals
cannot attend the meetings, they can send correspondences through the regular mail or
email to staff and staff has been directed to share everything with the Commission.
IV. Other Governmental Activities
Houle stated that MnDOT is planning to remove the W. 78th Street westbound access
from the TH494/TH169 interchange and Edina, along with the cities of Bloomington and
Eden Prairie are working jointly to stop this from happening. If this access is eliminated
the next access would be France and after France, it would be approximately 4 -5 miles
before another local access is available.
Commissioner White said she visited the 494 Corridor's office to gather some
information on parking. She said she's been studying parking to see if there's any
connection between parking and traffic issues. She suggested possibly looking at how
the Transportation Commission could interface with the Planning Commission where
parking and traffic issues are concerned if there's a connection.
V. Adjournment
Meeting adjourned at 7:55 p.m. Next meeting is scheduled for July 22, 2004, 6:00 -8:00
p.m. in the Community Room, City Hall.
.:1
Gordon Hughes
From:
Bennerotte
Sent:.
Wednesday, July 28, 2004 8:33 AM
To:
Darlene Wallin
Cc:
Gordon Hughes
Subject:
FW: Parks & smoking ban
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Mark Sprenkle [mailto:spren005 @umn.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 8:50 PM „
To: Jennifer Bennerotte
Subject: Parks & smoking ban
I am writing to strongly urge the Edina City Council to support a ban on
tobacco use at all Edina Parks at all times.
This issue affects me both personally and professionally.
I am an Edina resident who frequently takes my 3 year old daughter to
various Edina parks. I feel the parks contribute to the excellent
quality of life we enjoy as Edina residents. I do not want my child,
and others, to be exposed to tobacco while they play. As a community we
should follow the lead of other communities that have already passed a
tobacco ban and be an example to communities who have yet to follow that
lead.
As a pediatrician I am constantly counseling kids /teens to pursue a
healthy lifestyle. This obviously includes not using tobacco, in
addition to avoiding other risk taking behaviors. Youth can be so
easily influenced by the behaviors of those around them. Exposure to
tobacco use sends an unspoken message that smoking is OK. If we can
limit our children's exposure to something we know is unhealthy for
them, shouldn't we take action and do just that? Not only would our
community set a good example for our children, but we would additionally
reap the benefits of limiting the exposure of children to the dangers of
second hand smoke.
This is such an important health issue for our children and our
community at large. Please support the ban in full, by restricting (and
enforcing) tobacco use in our neighborhood parks at all times.
Thank you.
Trudie Sprenkle, MD
4113 W 42nd Street
Edina MN 55416
1
1k
Gordon Hughes
From:
Jennifer Bennerotte
Sent:
Wednesday, July 28, 2004 8:32 AM
To:
Darlene Wallin
Cc:
Gordon Hughes
Subject:
FW: Tobacco Free athletic fields
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Adler, Stuart [mailto:SAdler @STPHC.COM]
Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 9:58 PM
To: Jennifer Bennerotte
Subject: Tobacco Free athletic fields
Mayor Maetzold, Council Members: Kelly,Hovland,Masica, and Housh,
I am writing in regard to the proposed smoking ban in Edina Parks. I would strongly
suppport such a ban in all places where our youth participate in athletic pursuits. As a
Physician taking care of Cardiac patients on a daily basis I see the ravages of tobacco
abuse. I would strongly encourage you to enact this smoking ban.
Respectfully
Stuart Adler MD
1
Page 1 of 1
Gordon Hughes
From:
Jennifer Bennerotte
Sent:
Tuesday, July 27, 2004 3:25 PM
To:
Darlene Wallin
Cc:
Gordon Hughes
Subject: FW: smoking ban
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: John Bjorklund [ mailto: JohnBjorklund @bloomingtonlakeclinic.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 27,2004 3:09 PM
To: Jennifer Bennerotte
Subject: smoking ban
As the medical consultant to the Bloomington division of public health, a long term resident of Edina and as the
medical consultant to the Edina public schools I am surprised by the reticence recently shown by the Edina park
board on the smoking ban issue. I am astounded that they were not more forceful in their wording of their
recommendation with regards to smoking on athletic fields and in parks where youth activities occur. I think a
complete ban would be appropriate. There is never a time where smoking is less harmful than another. My
candid opinion is either do the ban or don't do anything at all. Any in between choice is less than ideal.
Unfortunately I will be out of town at the next council meeting so I felt I should make my own position known.
Sincerely,
John R. Bjorklund, M.D.
7/28/2004
G -�s -oy
P
�'tvuj��
1 11
A-ze
zwoqM5
5 17-6q ff\
5oqq tfl. (oo Oct.
— 5-Inazry�
JLW�
ijdi
01
Date: Summer 2004
To: Dr. Jeff Ho
From: Berit Peterson, Health Services Coordinator 952- 848 -4890
be1peterson(@,edina.kl2.mn.us
Subject: Edina Schools Health Services
Enclosed in a copy to the 2003 -04 Health Services Annual Report. Please note
page 18 which address 911 calls and pages 19 -21 which address student injuries. Also,
note page 26 which outlines the district CPR plan. The Fire Department is acknowledged
on page 24.
We called 911 more times this year than any previous year. There were 16 calls, 13
transports. Calls were for staff 5 of the 16 times.
I continue to be impressed with the response time and actions of the qualified staff at the
Edina Fire Department. When we have had questions regarding responses we have
talked with Chief Marty Scheerer who has responded quickly and thoroughly. Please let
me know if any of the EMS staff have comments or questions regarding appropriateness
of the 911 calls, treatment before EMS arrival, or cooperation after arrival. I would
appreciate any opportunity to talk with you on the phone or meet with you.
It is important for the EMS staff to know that there is Health Service staff in all the
schools when school is in session. The elementary schools have a Health Service
Associate who is first aid and CPR trained. They work with nurses who are not on site.
The secondary schools have a Licensed School Nurse and a Health Service Associate.
The Licensed School Nurse is an RN with a bachelor's degree and a Public Health Nurse
Certificate. The nurse at Valley Middle School and I are also First Responders. Keep us
in mind as you plan for potential community disasters.
Thanks for your continued quality service and collaboration to serve Edina students.
L.effert Tigelaar and Barbara Kyle
+`+ 5816 Stuart Avenue
Edina, MN 55436
Home 952- 920 -1899, L.effert Cell 952- 237 -7340
Dennis Maetzold, Edina Mayor,
4801 West 50's Street
Edina, MN 55424
July 22, 2004
Dear Mr. Maetzold; Edina Mayor,
As Countryside Elementary School parents and homeowners we want to express our deep concern with
Countryside's plan to add an additional parking lot and the plan to change the traffic flow patterns around the
school. Our home is adjacent to Countryside, separated in the front by the Stuart Avenue right -of -way. We have a
direct view of the school and are affected by the traffic flow in and around the school property. We request your
support in examining the need for this project, its long term effectiveness and its fiscal merit in this time of severe
budget cuts in public education.
By mere coincidence, when we spoke to a sub - contractor on the site last weci end, we becaiat, aware that
Countryside is planning to convert current play space use on the west blacktop to a large parking lot for school staff.
Because this was a complete surprise to us we called Julie Hatzung, Principal at Countryside, she explained that the
staff parking lot (to the east of the school) is short eight parking spaces and therefore eight staff members park in the
visitor parking lot to the north of the school bus drop off. In addition to addressing the schools perceived staff
parking shortage (because we observe open spots in the visitor lot during the school year) she said that the new
parking lot would also promote child safety by re- routing parent pickup and drop -off to the East parking lot. This
assumption presumes that a school principal, the janitorial staff and the facilities management team at the school
district can make sound traffic safety decisions and have a good understanding of the long term impact and
usefulness and how it affects the city and its neighborhoods. She also made it clear that the project will happen
before school starts this fall and that she will inform the neighbors when the plans are complete. We feel that it is not
enough to just show us the completed plans and that we should demand involvement during the needs assessment
and design process of such a drastic change to our neighborhood.
We have numerous concerns about the project because it is not based on a thorough needs assessment of actual
traffic flow data and it has not included communication with school parents and neighborhood input. At this time
without adequate data and discussion of all possible solutions we do not believe this project will be an intelligent
and responsible use of the school district's referendum funds.
As a professional Public Health Administrator and an Architect we know it is a priority to ensure the safety of our
children. However-- it -is- possible that- changing the current- traffic - situation -to a single - focused - -and- unstudied - - -- - --
solution will further compromise our children's safety. To address a public safety issue the proposed engineering
change is only one of many possible strategies to truly address safety. It is also critical to educate those involved
(parents and students) as well as enforce current rules.
It is obvious that the quality of the neighborhood and its livability is also negatively impacted when a large
illuminated parking lot surrounded by a. chain - linked fence is perched atop the school greens. The parking lot will
become a major focal point for many school neighbors it will also create other nuisances such as lot lighting, car
lighting, and noxious fumes (in addition to eliminating play space).
These concerns should warrant an immediate halt of this project until a thorough yearlong traffic flow and parking
needs study has been completed by independent traffic specialists. The data should be evaluated to develop possible
solutions with input from neighbors and parents during the planning process. We feel that this will provide the
district, the city, and the neighborhood with the best possible and fiscally responsible long -term solution to
guarantee our children's safety.
We appreciate your support in following up on our concerns and we are available for further discussion.
Sincerely,
T
i i-
Leffert Tigelaar and Barbara Kyle
i
City of Edina
July 28, 2004
Leffert Tigelaar and Barbara Kyle
5816 Stuart Avenue
Edina, MN 55436
Dear Mr. Tigelaar and Ms. Kyle:
Mayor Maetzold has asked that I respond to your letter of July 22, 2004, with respect to parking lot
and traffic flow changes at Countryside Elementary School. I have taken the liberty of forwarding
your letter to Kenneth Dragseth, Superintendent of Edina Public Schools. Please understand that
decisions with respect to the Countryside. School campus are under the purview of the Edina
Public Schools and not the City of Edina. As such, they are in the best position to respond to your
concerns.
Sincerely,
Gordon L. Hughes
City Manager
- - - -- GLH /dw -- - - - - - -- - - -- - - --
CC: Kenneth Dragseth, Edina Public Schools
Jay Willemssen, Edina Public Schools
Mayor Maetzold and City. Council
City Hall
4801 WEST 50TH STREET
EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394
www.cityofedina.com
952 - 927 -8861
FAX 952 - 826 -0390
TTY 952 - 826 -0379
NDINA 4TH ON JULY PARADE VOLUNTEER COMMITTEE ''�'�`"_ "
42,01 WELT 50TU !TRENT 55424
952 -2,"9 -0367
WWWWWAPARADE.O1116
www.edinaparade.or9
July 13, 2004
Ms. Ruth Schmoll
Edina Fire Department
6250 Tracy Avenue
Edina MN 55436
Dear Ruth:
Thank you SO0000 much, and a special thank you to the Edina Fire Fighters and their fam-
ilies for taking time from your own family holiday to appear in our Edina 4th of July Parade.
You were a hit!!!! As I visit with people who saw you in our parade, there's no end to the com-
pliments you are receiving. And the role model that you provide for young people in our com-
munity goes without saying.
Thank you again. Please mark us on your calendars for next year.
Have a great summer!!
Mary Brindl
Entertainment Committee
2004 Edina 4th of July Parade Volunteer Committee
4
Memo
Toe Mayor & City Council
From: Mike Siitari, Police Chief .
Date: 7/23/2004
Re: 2003 Crime Statistics
The Bureau of Criminal Apprehension has published their annual crime report for 2003. 1 am
pleased to report that Edina had the lowest crime rate of any first or second ring city in
Hennepin County. Adjacent communities had crime rates that were 24100% higher then
Edina's. The only cities that had a lower crime rate were Deephaven, Corcoran, Dayton and
Champlin.
I attribute part of this difference to the commitment of the Council and Police Department to
proactive traffic enforcement. An active visible patrol force can make a difference in where
criminals choose their targets. I believe there is a correlation between our vigorous traffic
enforcement and the low crime rate. After 26 years with the Edina Police Department I have
also recognized that the Police Department is just one part of the puzzle. Edina residents
and businesses make this a special place because of their commitment to keeping this
community a safe place to live and work. Community involvement makes a major difference
in the crime rate. Working together we can keep Edina one of the safest places to live, work
and play.
A copy of the crime rate summary sheets for Hennepin County is attached. The numbers
can be a bit confusing at first glance. The Part 1, Part 2 and Grand Totals are not the actual
number of crimes that were reported. They are the rate per 100,000 inhabitants so all the
cities rates can be directly compared to each other.
• Page 1
I
1
TABLE 12
MINNESOTA SUMMARY INFORMATION
CRIME RATE PER 100,000 INHABITANTS (AND PERCENT CLEARED) - 2003
Agency
Population
Part 1
Crimes
Part 2
Crimes
Grand
Total
Percent
Cleared
Apple Valley
46,455
3,188
8,042
11,230
49
Lakeville
44,006
2,134
5,520
7,654
62
Dodge County Total
18,092
1,570
11,403
12,973
62
Dodge Co. Sheriff
13,605
1,889
14,201
16,090
64
Kasson
4,487
602
2,920
3,521
34
Douglas County Total
33,490
2,117
5,915
8,032
61
Douglas Co. Sheriff
24,490
1,952
4,777
6,729
48
Alexandria
9,000
2,567
9,011
11,578
82
Faribault County Total
16,511
1,987
2,877
4;863
44
Faribault Co. Sheriff
7,747
1,317
2,027
3,343
44
Blue Earth
3,695
4,195
6,522
10,717
47
Elmore
750
3,733
4,267
8,000
22
Wells
2.545
-
_
_
_
Winnebago
1,518
2.372
2,635
5,007
49
Frost
256
2,734
1,953
4,688
17
Fillmore County Total
21,552
682
1,531
2,213
45
Freeborn County Total
33,248
1,838
4,500
6,337
70
Freeborn Co. Sheriff
14,518
854
2,452
3,306
72
Albert Lea
18,730
2,600
6.086
8,687
70
Goodhue County Total
44,395
3,284
6,140
9,424
49
Goodhue Co. Sheriff
21,233
1,517
2,506
4,022
44
Cannon Falls
3,872
7,619
9,298
16,916
47
Red Wing
16,444
4,555
9.341
13,896
48
Zumbrota
2,846
3,233
10,471
13,703
67
Grant County Total
6,417
1,683
7,776
9,459
31
Hennepin County Total
1,141,347
4,421
6,323
10,744
40
Hennepin Co. Sheriff
10,661
1,623
9,014
10,637
62
Bloomington
86,907
4;301
4,651
8,952
53
BrookIyn Center
29;767
7,673
6,551
14,224
50
Brooklyn Park
68,761
4,789
.7,347
12,136
41
Crystal
23,160
3,908
4,003
7,910.
48
Dee haven - Woodland
4,421
746
3,189
3,936
54
Edina.
48,391
2,267 1
2,017
4;284
44_
South Lake Minnetonka
12,315
1,608
5,895
7,503
58
Golden Valley
20,694
3,552
5,504.
9,056
51
Hopkins
17,495
1,583
3,184
4,767
50
Minneapolis
390,415
6,447
9,520
15,997.
32
Minnetonka
52,346
2,478
2,860
5,338
50
Mound
9,627
2,711
6,721
9,432
56
New Hoe
21,298
2,874
5,339
8,212
54
Orono
11,949
1,548
3,607
5,155
53
Osseo
2,483
765
7,612
8,377
88
Plymouth
67,236
2,790
3,871
6,662.
39
Richfield
35,140
3,671
5,484
9,155
54
Robbinsdale
14,411
4,504
6,814
11,318
46
St Anthony
8,175
3,939
4,000
7,939
53
St. Louis Park
45,026
3,596
4,522
8,118
42
Wayzata
4,196
4,099
5,195
9,295
37
Univ. of Minnesota PD -M ls.
(B)
-
_
_
44
Metro Airport PD
(B)
48
TABLE 12
MINNESOTA SUMMARY INFORMATION
CRIME RATE PER 100,000 INHABITANTS (AND PERCENT CLEARED) - 2003
Agency
Population
Part 1
Crimes
Part 2
Crimes
Grand
Total
Percent
Cleared
Wayzata
4.196
4,099
5.195
9.295.
37
Univ. of Minnesota PD -Mpls.
(B)
-
_
_
44
Metro Airport PD
(B)
-
-
-
_
Eden Prairie
56,020
2.562
3,017
5.578
47
Maple Grove
51,391
2,901
4.318
7.219
45
Minnetrista
6,358
2,139
5.757
7,896
64
Cham hn
22,645
543
1.060
1.603
55
Medina
4,087
1,468
5,652
7,120
68
Corcoran
5.744
749
1.323
1072
19
Dayton
4,795
501
2.231
2,732
76
West Hennepin
5,433
1,307
5.724
7,031
66
Three Rivers Park District
(B)
-
Houston Countv Total
20,120
1,446
7,714
9,160
62
Houston Co. Sheriff
9,147
1.498
10,419
11,916
60
Caledonia
3.025
2,050
9.851
11,901
65
La Crescent
5,023.
1.832
5,992
7,824
64
Hubbard County Total
18,750
4,032,
9,856
13,888
59
Hubbard Co. Sheriff
15,408
2,674
7,626
10,300
57
Park Rapids
3.342
10.2931
20,138
30,431
64
Isanti County Total
31,925
2,202
3,731
5,933
51
Isanti Co. Sheriff
26.293
1,118
2,267
3,385
51
Cambridge
5,632
7,262
10.565
17,827
52
Itasca County Total
44,889
1,441
4,647
6,088
'60
Itasca Co. Sheriff
36,966
1,631
5,124
6,755
59
Grand Rapids
7,923
555
2,423
2,979
76
Jackson County Total
11,498
2,357
4,488
6,845
32
Jackson Co. Sheriff
6,170
1,021
1,848
2,869
19
Jackson PD
3,572
5,263
10,302
15,566
33
Lakefield
1,756
1,139
1,936
3.075
67
Kanabec County Total
15,301
3,183
5,836
9,019
42
K.anabec Co. Sheriff
. 12,043
2,400
3,380
5,779
23
Mora
3,258
6,077
14,917
20,994
61
Kand yohi County Total
42,043
3,004
3,910
6,914
55
Kandi ohi Co. Sheriff
23,318
1,818
2,200
4,018
48
Willmar
18,725
4,481
6,040
10,521
58
Kittson County Total
5,393
1,428
6,842
8,270
75
Kittson Co. Sheriff
4,172
1.846
8,845
10,690
75
Hallock
1,221
-
Koochichinr County Total
14,648
2,553
6,281
8,834
26
Koochiching Co. Sheriff
7,808
1,563
3,676
5.238
26
International Falls
6.840
3,684
9,254
12.939
26
Lac Qui Parl County Total
8,232.
1,008
1,992
3,000
42
Lac Qui Parle Co. Sheriff
4,858
1.132
2,470
3,602
45
Dawson
1,570
1,783
2,484
4.268
30
Madison
1.804
-
277
277
100
Lake County Total
11,283
1.418
2,641
4,059
59
Lake Co. Sheriff
5,486
2.133
3.354
5,487
53
Silver Bay
2,110
664
758
1,422
33
Two Harbors
3,687
787
2,658
3,445
80
M
July 2, 2004
Edina City Council
4801 West 50'' Street
Edina, MN 55424
Dear City Council Members:
The reason for our letter today is to voice our concerns over the 44th and France
Redevelopment Plan, which is to be, revisited during the July 6 City Council Meeting.
We are concerned, as are many of our neighbors, as to the nature of the Redevelopment
Plan as well as the impact certain development may have on the Morningside
neighborhood.
It is not that we are adverse to any redevelopment in the area; we are actually requesting
involvement in the process as concerned citizens, proud Morningside residents and Edina
taxpayers. As we understand, the Edina City Council approved the Redevelopment Plan
in 1990. Nearly 15 years later, the same Plan is being moved forward without input,
concern for or information from the homeowners and families with whom the changes
would most effect. Not to mention those nine residential and twelve business dwellings
which will be either eliminated or altered beyond current recognition.
Not only is the Redevelopment Plan infringing on personal property but is also outdated
and has not addressed other major issues such as effect to the neighborhood, i.e.: traffic,
scale of redevelopment or type of retail and housing space. Therefore, we are requesting
a halt in further movement of the 44h and France Redevelopment Plan till the Edina City
Council Members meet and discuss this issue with the Morningside Neighborhood
Association.
you.
Sincerely,
k W m McGo44`h Street
Edina, MN 55424
5808 Mait Lane
Edina, MN 55436
July 30, 2004
City Council
Edina, MN 55436
Dear Council,
I am totally in favor of a ban on smoking in our city parks. Smoke from cigars and
cigarettes are triggers for my asthma as I am sure it is for many people. Smoking is a
choice and asthma is not. Smokers should only smoke in places that are designated and
that are out. of the way of people who have breathing problems or who do not choose to
smoke. Another reason I favor a ban is that we should set an example for our youth that
we do not think smoking is a healthful activity and that we want to protect them from
second hand smoke. Our city parks are full of fresh air and I would like to keep it that
way.
Sincerely,
}
C-
Carol Miller
Page 1 of 1
Darlene Wallin
From: Jennifer Bennerotte
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 4:02 PM
To: Darlene Wallin
Cc: Gordon Hughes
Subject: FW: Addressed to Edina City Council members - Upcoming meeting regarding Tobacco Free Parks
For Edina
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Richard C Lussky [mailto:lussk001 @umn.edu]
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 3:36 PM
To: Jennifer Bennerotte
Cc: Richard C Lussky
Subject: Addressed to Edina City Council members - Upcoming meeting regarding Tobacco Free Parks For Edina
Dear Members of the Edina City Council,
I am a resident of Edina, and as a professional I take care of children and newly born infants. I am strongly in
support of a policy to make all Edina parks tobacco free. In addition to the general public (including children)
health benefits of such a measure, there is also scientifically sound evidence of benefit to babies inutero (fetuses).
When dealing with children the underlying premise should be stressed that they are at a higher risk for
developing long -term complications related to environmental tobacco exposure because of their physiologic
immaturity (i.e., they can't metabolize and excrete toxins as readily as adults) and a longer lifetime over which
such exposures can manifest as disease.
Additionally, from a pregnant mother perspective: there are studies that have shown linkages between
maternal environmental exposure to tobacco (where the mother is not smoking, but is being exposed to
environmental smoke) and the following: gene mutations in newbom white blood cells, an increased risk for
premature delivery, decreased birth weight, and one study showing an average decrease in height of 0.5 inches
at 5 years of age.
The medical evidence is overwhelming to show the benefits of eliminating environmental tobacco exposure to
pregnant mothers, children, and families. I sincerely hope that you pass this policy. If you have any questions for
me, please don't hesitate to contact me through my office number: (612) 873 -2960. 1 sincerely appreciate your
thoughtful consideration of my comments. I look forward to seeing you August 17th.
Thank you,
Rich Lussky M.D.
Richard C. Lussky M.D., FAAP
Co- Medical Director, Newborn Intensive Care Unit
Medical Director, Infant Apnea and Pulmonary Program
Hennepin County Medical Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota
State Volunter Chair, March of Dimes' Prematurity Prevention Campaign
Phone: (612) 873 -2960
Fax: (612) 904 -4284
8/3/2004
07 -26 -04 08:47am From -city of Edina T -980 P.001 /005 F -439
FAX CUVER" ' SFIEET
FAX NO. (952)$26 -0390
CITY OF EDINA
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
DATE: July 26, 2004 TIME: 8 :55 AM
TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET): 4
TO: Scot Housh
FIRM NAME:
FAX NUMBER: 763 -302 -7200
FROM: Wayne Houle
952 - 826 -0443
COMMENTS: Steve Lillehaug our Traffic Engineer spoke to John
Lynch at the Normandale Branch and received this reply. We haven't
asked specifically if these boxes could be moved to the home, but will
be making this request today. In reading this information I would say
that the City has many boxes not in compliance, i.e. Vernon Ave.,
Gleason Road, and Blake Road. Contact me if you need anything
else. Thanks
PLEASE CONTACT ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AT 952 -826 -0371 IF
TRANSMISSION IS INCOMPLETE OR CANNOT BE READ.
07 -26 -04
08:47am From -city of Edina
NaffrmrAW& Owich
W oe weal70' Ond
Ram WIN 554arro e
Fax 9
F'I+h orw 8621 150
4Q 1(e [ o rr ev
v 3`� 11
�ec NV�a k 1 t3 diCe S �.
T -980 P.002/005 F -439
pww
Pho Oat=
no Cal
0 UlVeM AE°r RwMw G Ph e" Cawmat V Plpw ROW Q Pg w Rewde
• Contnlsedw
Ar � ��� �� � •�- dye c�;Q, � lar �- � �K� d° ,no -(�-
�,,., 4,av U ,M1v b � ca m � • d.G tee �- 5 `; k '
y--F �� GtJ' rrCr.+'� c�e �. ,t�.ra/ ►S G J r -6 s �
Govt VGr i� -a a �� �aSr
G
f r. • r • � .rlr.• �J�r�. ...A ✓. 1 • rr R�OrT /�'. t�J. I I
07 -26 -04 08:47am From -city of Edina T -980 P.003/005 F -439
CORRECT METHOD OF MAIL BOX INSTALLATION
FOR CITY DELIVERY
HEIGHT: 45 - +48 INCHES ABOVE THE STREET LEVEL,
HAVE BOX EXTEND AS FAR IN FRONT OF SUPPORT POST AS POSSIBLE.
(THIS REDUCES RISK OF SNOW PLOW DAMAGE.)
ADDRESS MUST BE ON SIDE; OF BOX FROM WHICH CARRIER APPROACHES,
IN LETTERS ABOUT ON (1) INCH HIGH (OR ON FRON OF BOX IN CASES
WHERE BOXES ARE GROUPED.)
BOX MUST BE LOCATED 90 THAT THE CARRIER CAN SERVE WITHOUT
LEAVING THE VEHICLE.
CUSTOMERS MUST KEEP THE APPROACH TO THEIR MAILBOXES CLEAR
OF DESTRUCTIONS TO ALLOW SAFE ACCESS FOR DELIVERY. IF LISPS
EMPLOYEES ARE IMPEDED IN REACHING A MAIL RECEPTACLE, THE
POSTMASTER MAY WITH DRAW DELIVERY SERVICE:
163 E. COON
r,4-
OQ
•y � ��II �j1.% i .aya � � li �� _ _ �
Page 7 I
07 -26 -04 08:47am From -city of Edina
T -980 P.004/005 F -439
Cuntorner Map ReoeptM9GS W1 ?.3 10
,A
_.. _ .. .. _ Dppp Basic Information
b040 Delivery of Mall
W41 Customer Mail Receptacles
Summary D041 describes the standards for letteftne or otlaer receptacles for the dept or
recelpt of mall. it aim contains the standards for ourbelde rnaib mwo.
1.0 BASIC STANDARDS
Au ftrized
&zapt as excluded by 1.2, every letterbox or oilier rem intended or used for
Dopoaltory
the reoelpt or delivery of mail an any ft delivery route, rural delivery rouge,
hthway contract route. or afiter mall route is designated an auMoriied depository
for mail within fire meaning of 1 a U80 1702,1705,17013. and 1726.
Exdtr®IoM®
Door dolts and nonlod"a bins ortroughs used with aparkru nt house maflbcoaes
1.2
are not last rbom wlth4r the meaning of 1a USC 1725 and are rent private read
mmtades forte MWairds for mafiable matter not bearing pose found in or
on private maA receptaces. The post or other support is not part of the mcop%ft
Use for Mall
lxpt under 211, the reaNAades descrtbed In 1.1 may be used only for matter
1.3
bearing posftge. Otter f n as Permed by 2.10 or 2.1 1, no part of a mail
.
moeptade may be used to deNer any matter not bearing poste, MdLdng itwu
or ntaltar placed upon, supparthd by, aita td to, hang from, or inserted btfra a mad
MCOP le matter not bew" postage and lbund as described
lau
IS to flab passage as would be paid if it were carded by man
Clear Approach
CtrSorrteits must ]aaep the apprtoach to their mailboxes dear of obstrudione to
I A
allow ad# erxess for daaverl. ff LISPS employees arc Impeded in reacft a mad
mcepta de, the postmaster may Mhftw doMw servke.
2.0
CURBSIDE MAILBOXES
NWmu* oturer
Marnrti7aob t M of all malbxes dealgned and made to be erected at the edge of a
SpeclTlcatlone
roadway or curbside cf a street and to be served by a canter from a vehicle on any
2.1
city routei rural mul s, or t VmW =cant route must obtain appmval of their
PMdude under LISPS Standard 7. Ab116caaw� CAfyand IfiuW Cutb31de To nacelle
ahead aaratrucdon standards and drawings or other k*wn ation about am
mantbtrm3 of curter Rfallb MM wdW to USPS EnginewkQ (see GM for
address).
CuMmnDuht
ThO beet P0stMWW mOV appFM a Curbelde rnalib= consbuoted by a customer
Mallbox
who, forasslhetfc or other reaso . do= not wot to use an approved
2.2
monufmdur ed born. Thu custom -built tot must generapy meet the eame standards
03 maMd3dured boxes for flag, size, wengtr, and quality of
construcftL
Address Idendittetion
9sry curbside melboor must bear ttte following address information:
2.3
a. A bmr number, it used, ht mribed in aonttaWng coiar in now letters and
numerals at lent 1 Inch high an the side of the box *Tde to the carriers
regular approack or on the door ff bcoasa am groupecL
b. A house number if street names and house numbers have beers assigned by
local KMorIVe% and ftre posfma W a;<U t fts their use as a poft addrthsa.
if the boa Is on a d Rent street from the nuathmees rem, the street
name and ease number must be inscribed on the Mm.
DUM kOW 30 CM 04M
Da
07 -26 -04 08:48am From -city of Edina
T -980 P.005/005 F -439
WAD04` 4
_,. Cuatomer Mail Receptsotes
Owner's Name
The main= may bear the owner's n=e.
8.4
Advertising
Any advertising on s mailbox or its support is prohlblted.
2.5
Mailbox Post
The past or other support for a curbside nWlbax must be neat and of adequate
2.6
strength and size. The post mepf not repmsW effigies or caricatum thst tend to
dlspamee or ridicule any person. The bolt may be ab¢tched to a fixed or movable
arm.
Location
SW *d 10 state laws and wgubUoM a ourbside mania must be placed to allow
sale and convenient derAftry by canters without leaving their vehicles. The box
must be an the right -hard side of to road in the cilreeftri of travel of the ramie
on any now rural route or highway oo""d route, In all cases where traffic
conditions are dangerous for the catriars to diteto the left to reach the box, or
whore *H* doling so would violate ftft laws and regulatlans.
Moue Than One
If more than one tamliy wishes to share a mall MCSPbW% the fbilowing stanolards
Family
apply;
18
a. Routs and Boot Number Addressing. On rural and highway ppntraot routes
aUftrtred MJ use s horde and box numbering system (e.B., RR 1 SM 155),
UP to ON %Riles may ahave a ak g& map NcepUde and use a common
nests and box designation. A written notice of agroaMen% signed by the
heads of tt» WnIlles or Individuals who want to Jain In the use of such bohc,
must be OW with the postmaster at the delivery of ift
N Carnaahxlon to Street Name and Number Addressing. When *eat name and
numbeling sysoems are a,dopmd,1hosa aaddmam railed di tutot eugonrer
locadiom and ssquenwse Aural w1d hWmW contrast route cu st+ mmm who
are aseigned dit mM primary addh isses (6.%. 723 APPLE WAY vs. 138
APPLE WAY) should meet Ghdjv uid mall receptacles In locaftons
recommended by their postmasters and boon using their new addresses,
Ct'g°mwm hmft ciftrent primary addresses who wish to oondnue wring
a connmon Meptade must use the address of Me receptaeleft owner and
tho "care oP address 1hrmst:
JOHN 170E
CIO ROBIM SMITH
123 APPLE WAY
Customers having a common primary adaless (e.W. SW MAIN ST) but
dit mint secondary addressee fag,, APT 101, APT 102, arc,) may coftue
to share a common recapthde if singpoint delivery is authorized for the
Pl'imary address. Secondary arldmsses should still be tnokded In all
cormapondenom
Locked Box
2.9
A majkm with a lock must have a slot that is large enough to aocommodate the
cull mWa ramial dally mall volume. The LISPS nell her opens a laded box
nor
accepts a key for this purp0e.
Delivery of
NevvsPa�
QanendllK cuibelde matlbarms arc to he used for mall only. However, publishers of
nawspapars re malled as Period2cWa may, on Sundays and national
2.1
ace c pia o
W � place of t1a Sunday or holiday Muse In the rural nsft &W
o
gay aor MO mute boom of subacdbers If those mples arc removed from the,
boxes IIE6m the next scheduled day of mall dellveryt
D`90
DMH Irtsue so w"M
o.
,
-- cot Ho u e Yl
CD(M-h Dbv of < s
t)1 Su
ha� -7 .
=:��
T-d *loco -Zb6 (296) siionoa zzajg eBZ :OT b0 TZ inr
MDBWDP tto'er
,r
MINNESOTA DEVELOPMENTAL BASKET LL Sv'�'i�
www.mdbbalf.com
2004
Boys & Girls
Summer Basketball
League
Bays & Girls Grades 4th through 9th
Session: Weeks of: I Format:
# 1 June 14, 21 & 28
#2 July 12, 19 &26
# 3 August 2, 9 :::16
League Times: Iq
2:00- 3:15pm 3:15- 4:30pm
Monday
Tuesday
Wednesday
Thursday
Grade 4 & 5
Boys
Grade 4 & 5
Girls
Grade 6 Girls
Grade 6 Boys
Grade 7 Boys
Grede,Z-Qids
Grade 8 & 9
Girls
Grade 8 & 9
Boys
• 4 vs 4 play
• Form your own team or sign up individually
and be placed on a team
• All games consist of two 10 minute halves
• At least two games per day
Cost-
• 130.00 per session before .tune 7,
$35.00 per session after June 7
Locations:
Bloomington
- The Edge in Minnetonka /Plymouth
For More Information... 952/346 -8866
wwwwwwwwrru.. w, wiyrwiwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww
League He -dstration Form
Mail to: MDB - 2050 West 96th Street - Bloomington, MN 55431
Name
Address
City /State/Zip
Parent Name(s)
Home Ph.Mork Ph.
Email Address
Grade, Fall '04
T -shirt size (Sm., M, L, XL (Adult sizes)]
Names of Athletes on your team:
1) Session(s) [circle]
1 2 3
2) Amount Due: $
3) Credit Card Payment:
Expiration Date
Location
OFFICE USE
Date Recd
Amount
Check #
2'd t060-2b6 (296) siiono0 22aj0 LB2 :OT b0 12 Znr
MCWD 509 Plan Revisions
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Feasibility Study
Public Process
Michael Wyatt
MCWD Planner
Minnehaha Creek
Watershed District
Why ? ??
1. Public Process
z. Lower Watershed Plan
3. U.S. Army Corps Feasibility Study
4. MCWD Comprehensive Water
Resources Management Plan (509
Plan)
Goal of Public Process
To provide a forum for representatives from
the community to provide input on the
development of the Minnehaha Creek
Watershed District 509 Plan Revisions and
long-term management of the creek
• Directly involve District Cities and Hennepin County
• Engage local constituency to document values
associated with area water resources
• Assemble a technical team to assist in development
of a feasible plan recommendation
1
FWlalCar.eweaskingforfromthe City?
or the process through a Joint
D Resolution
• Appointment of one elected official,
one technical staff member, two
interested citizens
• Consideration of the final product of
the public process — there are no
obligations after process is completed
,.b.em ••�!!M1"< 4dr1'MIO �r.wne�.wnaµ
Projected Outcome
Presentation of a recommended plan of action
for the Minnehaha Creek (Lower) Watershed
which Incorporates local values and Interests as
well as community consensus
• Within the framework of the existing
goals per MCWD Board direction
• Evaluation of potential watershed
scenarios
• Will provide for long -term resource
planning for Minnehaha Creek
inq,m imp •�YYhw}�WWf1Hi�iFq •.- wwc,yw.,wase
FElected Participants/Project Partners levels of involvement:
cials
• Oversig ht of Citizen Committee
• Final Recommendation
2. Appointed Citizens
• Plan Development
3. Technical Committee
• Advisory
RAI
Meeting Coordination
• Each Citizen decision
;I LCWD Board tt subject to a technical
review
Elecu:d:OfflcWla •Final
recommendation
' Te2hnlcal:Group AppoGrted t7thens. subject to the approval
of the Elected Officials
and submitted to
MCWD Board
,..f.�� p(Iwt tgata � +••.w•ryw.,wnav
Elected Officials
• Includes representatives of District Cities,
Hennepin County, Minneapolis Parks 6 Recreation
Board, MCWD Board
• Explores political feasibility of recommendations
• Meets quarterly to review recommendations
• Submits final recommendation to the MCWD
Board
s
,,�,� s.�nra•i �mvWl•W �w- wwnawm.o+n��w
Fn!neAppointed Citizens
y project partners -two per partner,
D; 23 total
o mmended actions
• Explores social feasibility of recommendations
• Meets every other week - twelve meetings total
Technical Committee
• Consists of technical representatives of each of the protect
partners In addition to representatives from the Minnesota
Department of Natural Resources, Pollution Control Agency,
Department of Health, United States Fish 6 Wildlife Service and
the United States Amry Corps of Engineers
• Explores technical feasibility of recommended actions, provides
comments, revises plans and plan alternatives
• Convenes on as needed basis, most likely four to five meetings
I
J,uN rml � M•4 PMI"�^�r74�
Meeting Format
Three Phases:
1. Watershed Education (Meetings 14)
• Goat: Inform and educatethe general group on relevant
Issues concerning existing and future condltlons of the
watershed
• Outcome: Group will be prepared to evaluate extting
MCWD information and make an Informed recommendation
regarding the MCWD role In managing area resources
2. Watershed Scenarios (Meetings 5.8)
• Goal: Present and discuss different scenarios of watershed
management
• Outcome: Development of a preliminary plan for review by
Technical Commktee
s. Final Plan Development (Meetings 9-12)
• Goal: Review and revise technical recornmendadons
• Outcome: Final Plan recommendation for presentatlon to
elected officials
r.�wru•. • Ybwl itnYiitpNO bT fto+44— e—rlM
i
Conceptual Scenarios
• Business -As -Usual
• Maintenance of Status Quo (with'
Developed Conditions)
• Maximization of Recreational Benefits
• Ecological Restoration
J,uipnrml IPaYhbrd 6rWlYb wm4 e.arlxus•evar4µ
4
Business -As -Usual
Model Completed with HHPLS
Benefits • L>:tts
1. Reduce Number of Flood i. Potential Adverse Impacts
Problem Areas Associated with Water
r. Reduced Costs on Quality, Ecological
Development' Construction =ty, Downstream
Projects
s. Uttle Impact on Taxpayers r. May Run Contrary to the
At -Large ' _ Revised Goals of MCWD
s. TMDL's Unaddressed
.. Cities Assume All Costs of
Water Quality
Improvements from PCA
Regulation
,.w,mi t�!!lttE't 16..+1.�t ,�- ww..rlrr".aror�v
Maintenance of the Status Quo
Bsallts
,. ProJects =p don an -As
NeMeO' Bads
Mlnlmise Casts Associated with
Development
short-term Benefit for Taxpayers
MaJorlry of h..-X.-
Waterbodies Xave Met Target
Loatllna Goals, Development In
Lower Basin Is ProJeoMO to Be
Minimal In Future =11tions -
Mlnlrnal Irrvesvr,ent to Maintain
Status Ouo
i
Inveased Costs Associated with Retrofits
t May Not Be Able to Adequatery Predict the Effects of Development
Water OuMity Must Decline for Protects to Be tmpiemented
a Embgiral Integ�*fSystem V101 Most Ukey Decline arM Go Unaddressed
Examples of "Status Quo" -type Projects
• Stormwater Ponds
• Grit Chambers
• Alum Treatments ` X
• Stabilization of Eroded
Streambank/Lakeshore
• Projects are applied on
an "as needed' basis
,.ww,m, �sbrd I�akl�Yab , +�.a.•rswe..mrers,h
Gi
u
Examples of `Recreation" -type Projects
• Canoe Launches
• Phosphorus Management —
IrnLake and Upstream
Management
• Pathogen
Managemenl/Pubiic Health
• Fishing Access to Area
Resources
• Woody Debris Removal —
Navigadonal Access
• Reevaluation of Grays Bay
Dam Discharge
:{d c qe��Z
Ecosystem Restoration
Benefits
�. Focus on increased Ecological
Integrity
z. Increased Streambank Stability.
Reduced Scour /Erosion
s. Create a System of Connectivity
•. Increased Ecological Diversity,
Improved Fishery
• Costs
i. Increased Ecological Benefits May
Not Always Result In Increased Water
Quality/Clarity
z. Increased Restrictions /Regulation on
Stormwater Discharges
s.
Identified 'Problem' Flooding Area
May Not Be Addressed with Plan
�wo+orl�.a✓orl�/• �
d.- aawsw.,aro.s�r i
I
Al
ation of Recreational Benefits
F
S ,K•
eased Water
i. Increased Water
ational Use
Quality/Clarity Does Not
. ability of
Always Result In
Area Resources
Ecological Benefits
s. Increased Stewardship of
z. Ecological Integrity of
Local Users
System May Decline
s. Increased
Restrictions/Regulation of
Stormwater Discharges
,•. Streambank Stability May
Not Be Addressed/May
Decline
'"'p'm �
�IF�1MI1 +sWwNlw`..a�WI4`
Examples of `Recreation" -type Projects
• Canoe Launches
• Phosphorus Management —
IrnLake and Upstream
Management
• Pathogen
Managemenl/Pubiic Health
• Fishing Access to Area
Resources
• Woody Debris Removal —
Navigadonal Access
• Reevaluation of Grays Bay
Dam Discharge
:{d c qe��Z
Ecosystem Restoration
Benefits
�. Focus on increased Ecological
Integrity
z. Increased Streambank Stability.
Reduced Scour /Erosion
s. Create a System of Connectivity
•. Increased Ecological Diversity,
Improved Fishery
• Costs
i. Increased Ecological Benefits May
Not Always Result In Increased Water
Quality/Clarity
z. Increased Restrictions /Regulation on
Stormwater Discharges
s.
Identified 'Problem' Flooding Area
May Not Be Addressed with Plan
�wo+orl�.a✓orl�/• �
d.- aawsw.,aro.s�r i
I
Al
Examples of "Ecosystem Restoration" -type
Projects
• Wetiand Restoration —
Vegetative Restoration
• Sioengineered ,J
Streambanks /Canopy
Restoration
• Flow Distribution Over
Wetland Areas
• Removal of Grade
Control Structures a•
• Reevaluation of Grays
Bay Dam Discharges
FACitizen Outcomes of Public Process
reated Value- Engi neered Plan
dation — Community Consensus
• Acknowledgement and Approval from Local
Elected Officials
• The Basis of the Lower Watershed
(Minnehaha Creek Subwatershed)
Management Plan
• A Draft List of Projects for the U.S. Army
Corps Feasibility Study
'k
+'•v �yfM� � kk 9
tT
Questions ? ??
7
DRAFT RESOLUTION TO CREATE A NIINNEHAHA CREEK PARTNERSHIP
WHEREAS, Minnehaha Creek is a highly valued stream flowing from Lake Minnetonka to the
Mississippi River; and
WHEREAS, the preservation and enhancement of the Minnehaha Creek Corridor is a high -
priority expressed in the comprehensive plans for each of the cities along the Creek, and the
Water Resources Management Plan of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District; and
WHEREAS, urbanization in the Minnehaha Creek Watershed has led to the degradation of the
stream's flow regime, habitat and water quality, but the Creek has high potential for restoration;
and
WHEREAS, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District completed in 2003 a detailed
Hydrologic/Hydraulic and Pollutant Loading Study, and a Minnehaha Creek Stream Assessment;
and
WHEREAS the MCWD will undertake revisions to its Watershed Management Plan in
partnership with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Feasibility Study to explore the potential
federal interest for Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration and Flood Damage Reduction in the
Minnehaha Creek Corridor;
WHEREAS, the [MCWD] [City of ] desires to partner with the other communities along
the Creek to seek protection and restoration of the Minnehaha Creek Corridor;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the [MCWD] [City of ] supports the
formation of a partnership to provide guidance and recommendations on policy development,
technical issues, and public involvement to create a common vision and implementation plan for
the Minnehaha Creek Corridor, to be organized as follows:
Partnership Composition
The partnership will comprise the following partners:
• City of Minnetonka;
• City of Hopkins;
• City of St. Louis Park;
• City of Edina;
• City of Minneapolis;
• Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board;
• Hennepin County; and
• Minnehaha Creek Watershed District
2. Policy Board
a. The partnership Policy Board will comprise a member of the governing body of each
of the partner organizations.
b. The Policy Board will generally meet quarterly as needed and pursuant to an
established project schedule and work plan.
3. Technical Advisory Committee
a. The Technical Advisory Committee will provide technical review and
recommendations to the partnership and will comprise a staff representative from
each of the partner organizations, and a representative from the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources, Minnesota Department of Health and such other governmental agencies
having a technical interest and expertise to offer for the benefit of the Minnehaha
Creek Corridor.
b. The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District technical representative will serve as the
Chair of the Technical Advisory Committee.
c. The Technical Advisory Committee will generally meet monthly as needed pursuant
to the established project work schedule and work plan.
4. Public Advisory Committee
a. The Public Advisory Committee will comprise two citizen representatives designated
by each partner organization, and up to seven other representatives of stakeholder
organizations named by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District to represent
conservation, property owner, development, and recreational interests in the
Minnehaha Creek Watershed appointed by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed through
an open application process.
b. The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District will designate one of its Board Members to
serve as Chair to the Public Advisory Committee.
c. The Public Advisory Committee will generally meet monthly as needed pursuant to
the established project schedule and work plan.
5. Legal Authority
It is understood that the decisions and activities of the partnership are advisory only, and
will not have any binding legal authority on any of the partnership's members. The
parties to the partnership expect that recommendations developed and approved by the
partnership will be duly considered and acted upon by the governing body of the
respective the partnership members.
6. Term
The partnership will meet and work for an initial period of three (3) years, concluding on
or before March 1, 2007, subject to a determination to renew the work of the partnership
by each of its partner organizations.
44th & France Redevelopment
Community Response
Some Chanqe (27)
NO Development (263)