Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004-08-03_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL AUGUST 3, 2004 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Commissioner, Council Member or citizen so requests it. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the Agenda. * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA - Regular Meeting of July 20, 2004. II. ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL SOLUTION OF APPRECIATION - VINCE BONGAARTS * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of July 20, 2004. II. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS - Zoning Ordinances: First Reading requires affirmative rollcall votes of three Council members except that a rezoning from residential to non - residential requires four affirmative votes. Second Reading requires affirmative rollcall votes of three of- Council to pass except rezoning froM residential -to non= residential requires four affirmative votes. Waiver of Second Reading: Affirmative rollcall votes of four members of Council to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: Affirmative rollcall vote of three Council members required passing. Conditional Use Permit: Affirmative rollcall vote of three Council members required to pass. Variance Appeal: Favorable rollcall of Council Members present to uphold or deny appeal * A. LOT DIVISION - 7000 Tupa Drive and 6909 St. Patrick's Lane - (John Wright and Joel and Amy Anderson) * B. SET HEARING DATE - AUGUST 17,2004: 1. PRELIMINARY REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT - 5125 49TH St. West (Mark Jones/rhea Lucy Marshall) 2. PUBLIC HEARING - AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE - Floodplain Regulations Agenda/ Edina City Council August 3, 2004 Page 2 III. ORDINANCES — First Reading: Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second Reading: Favorable rollcall vote of three Council members to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: Affirmative vote of four Council members to pass. Rollcall A. ORDINANCE NO. 2004-10 - Second Reading Establishing a Municipal Dispensary IV. REPORTS/ RECOMMENDATIONS A. 44th and France Background Report B. Municipal State Aid Sidewalk - 4809 to 4709 West 70th Street Imp. No. S -074 C. "Fall Into the Arts Festival" Wine and Beer Temporary Dispensary D. Resolution No. 2004 -69 - Creating Minnehaha Watershed Partnership with Various Public Agency Partners V. FINANCE * A. CONFIRMATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS As per Pre -List dated July 21, 2004, TOTAL $984,434.31; and July 28, 2004, TOTAL $536,363.78. VI. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS VII. CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS VIII. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES IX. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL X. MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEM Tues Aug 17 Budget Hearing 5:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Aug 17 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mon Sep 6 LABOR DAY. HOLIDAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed Tues Sep 7 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Sep 14 PRIMARY. ELECTION DAY - POLLS OPEN 7:00 A.M. UNTIL 8:00 P.M. Tues Sep 21 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Oct 5 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Oct 19 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mon Nov 1 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERF Tues Nov 2 GENERAL ELECTION DAY - POLLS OPEN 7:00 A.M. UNTIL 8:00 P.M. Thur Nov. 11 VETERANS DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed . Tues Nov 16 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Thur. Nov 25 THANKSGIVING DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed Fri. Nov 26 DAY AFTER THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY HELD AT CITY HALL JULY 20, 2004, 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Housh, Hovland, Masica and Chair Maetzold. CONSENT AGENDA APPROVED Motion by Commissioner Hovland approving the Redevelopment Authority as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Masica, Maetzold Motion carried. made by Commissioner Housh and seconded Consent Agenda for the Edina Housing and *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FOR JULY 6, 2004, APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Housh and seconded by Commissioner Hovland approving the minutes of the regular meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority for July 6, 2004, as presented. Motion carried on rollcall vote — four ayes. There being no further business on the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Agenda, Chair Maetzold declared the meeting adjourned. Executive Director 0 to v � �o lase 1888 RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION WHEREAS, Vince Bongaarts began his career in Edina as a patrol officer for the Edina Police Department in 1967 and continued as Traffic Safety Coordinator in 1996 following his retirement from public safety; and WHEREAS, Vince Bongaarts has requested to retire from the Traffic Safety Coordinator position effective August 2, 2004; and WHEREAS, Vince Bongaarts. has worked above and beyond the position of Traffic Coordinator, many times working well over the allotted part -time hours and giving this time to the City of Edina; and WHEREAS, Vince Bongaarts has been a model of customer service, working one -on -one with residents and neighborhood groups; and WHEREAS, Vince Bongaarts for more than three decades has exemplified the City's mission of providing effective and valued public services, maintaining a sound public infrastructure, offering premiere public services and guiding the development and redevelopment of lands within the City, all in a manner that sustains and improves the uncommonly high quality of life enjoyed by residents and businesses; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council, City staff and all Edina residents hereby express their thanks and appreciation to Vince Bongaarts for his 36 years of work for the City of Edina. Dated this 3rd day of August 2004. Mayor Dennis F. Maetzold MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JULY 20, 2004 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Housh, Hovland, Masica and Mayor Maetzold. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Hovland approving the Council Consent Agenda as presented with the exception of Agenda Item W.A. Kitchen Renovation - Edina Senior Center. Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Masica, Maetzold Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF TULY 6, 2004, AND SPECIAL MEETING OF TULY 6, 2004, APPROVED Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Hovland, approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Edina City Council for July 6, 2004, and Special Meeting of July 6, 2004. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. ORDINANCE NO. 850 -A -25 ADOPTED GRANTING FINAL REZONING AND RESOLUTION NO. 2004 -68 ADOPTED GRANTING FINAL PLAT APPROVAL TO WALLINGFORD ADDITION (5101 WEST 70TH STREET) Affidavits of Publication were presented and ordered placed on file. Presentation by Planner Planner Larsen stated the City Council approved Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Plat approval for - Wallingford Addition at their April- 7,- 2004meeting. The approved plans c e for 117 units in two, four story buildings. Mr. Larsen said the proponents have now requested Final Rezoning and Final Plat. Mr. Larsen noted the plans for the Final Rezoning and Final Plat reflect a reduction in total unit count from 117 to 106. He explained that Building One designed as a rental unit would contain 74 units; with Building Two, designed as a for -sale condominium would contain 32 units. Mr. Larsen said the final plans met the City's Code requirements for enclosed and surface parking. However, using some surface spaces have been suggested as a proof of parking to allow an increase in the green space. Mr. Larsen said the proponent submitted the following plans: site plan, grading plan, landscaping plan and schedule, and building elevations with materials. Mr. Larsen added the only variance necessary, which had not changed since the preliminary approval was granted, was for building setback along Metro Boulevard with the plan showing a 39 -foot setback instead of the 49 feet required by City code. He concluded stating the proponents had Page 1 I Minutes/Edina City CounciOuly 20, 2004 agreed to provide a total of three (3) affordable housing units in the project, two in building one and one in building two. Mr. Larsen explained that the landscaping plan had been revised since the Planning Commission meeting to include an extension of the berm on the north side of the property and also the number of 12 -foot evergreen trees had been increased from seven to twelve. Member Masica asked if reducing the ponds on the site from two to one would have any impact upon wildlife. Mr. Larsen pointed out where the creek ran on the property and said that the developer wanted to minimize the wetland impact so they requested reducing the number of ponds. Member Hovland asked a number of questions including: • Staff's recommendation for bedroom sizes of affordable housing offered; • Details of the Proof of Parking Agreement; . • Potential terms and conditions of pond maintenance agreement; • Was there concern about drainage; and • Was staff satisfied with the proposed landscaping plan. Mr. Larsen suggested the affordable units in the rental building be one 1- bedroom unit and one 2- bedroom unit, with one 1- bedroom unit be affordable in the "for sale" condominium building. He continued stating the proof of parking agreement would be the standard agreement used with other developers. Engineer Houle stated the City would also use a standard agreement to cover the pond maintenance and that based upon the submitted plans drainage should not be a concern. Mr. Larsen concluded pointing out the proponents had increased the number of large evergreens from seven to twelve and also agreed to extend the berm to better screen the residential neighbors. Member Housh asked what were the proposed average rents for the building. Mr. Larsen explained he would defer to the developer to give the proposed rentals and price points of Mayor Maetzold asked what kind of agreement would the City require to ensure the affordable units were in place. Mr. Larsen pointed out a draft agreement that had been included with the Council's packet, which would be modified to require documentation of the developer either by copies of rental leases or sale documentation to ensure the affordability of the promised units. Member Hovland commented he believed the new plan presented a shorter profile to West 70th Street and he asked about the ability to maintain the privacy of residents of the affordable units. Mr. Larsen explained that data would be covered under existing state data practices statutes. Vasco Bernardi, 5346 Poplar Circle, Bloomington, explained that the developer would like to lessen the impact upon the wetlands and that was why they were attempting to reduce the number of ponds. He added that rents in the project would be approximately $1.30 per Page 2 Minutes/Edina City Council/Tuly 20, 2004 square foot or $1,000 and $1,300 per month depending upon the size of the apartment. He said they feel the proposed project would be a good one for both themselves and the City of Edina. Timothy Nichols, 1788 Clear Water, Savage, stated he had been an advisor to the Bernardi's. Mr. Nichols stated he had experience in developing affordable housing in a number of communities. He requested that the focus of the affordable housing be put on the rental housing and not to impose that condition on the condominiums. He suggested that more people would be better served by not including the condominiums. Mayor Maetzold commented that the Council could only react to the project in front of them and would not get into any other method of addressing the affordable housing in the project except that which had been agreed to by the applicant in writing and was before the Council. Member Hovland said he hoped the developer could hold the condominium sale prices to between $275,000 and $300,000 because there seemed to be a need for this type of housing in Edina. He added he was excited about the affordable units and thanked the developer for their cooperation in this area. Member Housh asked if the Council could amend what they were granting at this meeting if it were in the best interest of the City. Mr. Larsen stated that was a possibility. Member Masica asked if the City would have oversight of the .affordable units. Mr. Hughes stated that. would be part of the agreement between the City and the developer. Attorney Gilligan explained the developer would have to file reports with the City showing their compliance with the affordable units. Public Comment Alan Hohenstein, 5105 West 70th Street, expressed his concerns regarding the ponds and - screening. - Mr. Hohenstein -asked -that the ponds have some type of aeration to avoid stagnation. He asked that the developer be required to build a berm and plant it to totally screen the new buildings from the residential neighbors. Mr. Larsen explained that a portion of the proposed pond was intended to be a sedimentation area where water would settle before discharging to the creek. He said he would defer to the project architect to speak to the issue of the berm. Todd Young, KKE, said there were two issues relating to the berm. He noted that West 70th rises in elevation from east to west to the bridge on the edge of the project, while the property itself naturally slopes to the creek. Mr. Young said there was not enough room to keep the berm at the same height for the entire length of the property. Member Masica said she thought the proposed screening was well done. She asked whether the pond could be aerated and about the expense of doing so. Mr. Young said he was unsure of the cost, he thought it could be done, but that maintenance would become an issue. Page 3 Minutes/Edina City Council/iuly 20, 2004 Member Hovland asked, 1) if the pond would likely be dry unless there were very heavy rains, 2) was there any plans to install a liner and, 3) would there be any need for fencing the pond. Mr. Young replied that the pond would come into being with very heavy rains. Mr. Hughes noted there was approximately an eight -foot change in elevation in the pond. Mr. Houle explained that there was no plans for lining the pond and that this pond would most likely be wet a good portion of the time because it was designed to settle out sediment. He said there would be more danger from 9 Mile Creek and that ponds of this design were in existence all over the City without problems. Council Action Member Housh made a motion to close the public hearing, seconded by Member Masica. Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Masica, Mae tzold Motion carried. Member Housh made a motion granting Second Reading to the following ordinance approval the Final. Rezoning subject to: 1) Watershed District permits; 2) Maintenance agreement covering pond outlets; 3) Landscaping plan and bond to include re- vegetation plan around storm water ponding areas; 4) Proof of Parking Agreement, and 5) Provision for two affordable rental housing units in Building One (1 one - bedroom and 1 two - bedroom) and one affording "for- sale" housing unit in the condominium building Two. The affordable units to be subject to Metropolitan Council Standards for income and affordability: ORDINANCE NO. 850-A-25 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 850) BY REZONING PROPERTY TO PLANNED RESIDENCE DISTRICT - 4 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Subsection 850.06 of Section 850 of the Edina City Code is amended by adding the following thereto: -- - ---The extent-of-the Planned- Residence - District -4; P-RD- 4 is- enlarged-by the _addition-of- the - -. -.- following described property: Lot 1, Block 1, METRAM 1sT ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. The extent of the Planned Residence District 3 PRD -3 is reduced by removing the property described above. Section 2. Effective Date: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon adoption and publication according to the law. Adopted this 201h day of July, 2004. First Reading- April 7, 2004 Second Reading. July 20, 2004 Published: August 4, 2004 Attest Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Member Masica seconded the motion. Rollcall: Page 4 Dennis F. Maetzold, Mayor Minutes/Edina City CounciViuly 20, 2004 Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Masica, Maetzold Motion carried. Member Housh made a motion introducing the following resolution and moving its adoption granting Final Plat to Wallingford Addition subject to: 1) Watershed District permits; 2) Maintenance agreement covering pond outlets; 3) Landscaping plan and bond to include re- vegetation plan around storm water. ponding areas; 4) Proof of Parking Agreement, and 5) Provision for two affordable rental housing units in Building One (1 one - bedroom and 1 two- bedroom) and one affording "for- sale" housing unit in the condominium building Two. The affordable units to be subject to Metropolitan Council Standards for income and affordability: RESOLUTION NO. 2004-64 FINAL PLAT - WALLINGFORD ADDITION 5101 WEST 70TH STREET BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled, "WALLINGFORD ADDITION platted by The Wallingford Partnership L.L.P., a Minnesota limited liability partnership, Sentinel Holding Company an S Company and Antonio Bernardi and Maria Cecilia Bernardi, husband and wife, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council on July 20, 2004, be and is hereby granted final plat approval. Adopted this 20th day of July 2004. Member Masica seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Masica, Maetzold Motion carried. *HEARING DATE SET OF AUGUST 17 2004 AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE FOR FLOODPLAIN REGULATIONS Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Hovland setting August 17, 2004, as hearing date for Amendment to Zoning Ordinance for Floodplain Regulations. -- - -- - Motion carried on rollc _ =our- ayes. - -- ------------ - - - - -- - --- - - - - -- - ----- - - - - -- -- - - - FIRST READING GRANTED TO ORDINANCE NO. 2004 -10 ESTABLISHING A MUNICIPAL DISPENSARY AND RESOLUTION NO. 2004 -65 - ESTABLISHING LOCATIONS FOR MUNICIPAL DISPENSARIES Mr. Hughes suggested the Council hear both the proposed ordinance establishing a municipal dispensary and the proposed resolution establishing locations of such dispensaries at the same time. Mr. Hughes stated the staff had previously advised the Council that State Liquor Control felt the City could not issue itself a wine license and instead had to establish a municipal dispensary instead. He said that based upon that interpretation of state law, staff had prepared. an ordinance establishing a municipal dispensary and a corresponding resolution establishing Braemar Golf Course as a dispensary serving wine, intoxicating malt liquor and 3.2 beer with Fred Richard Golf Course serving 3.2 beer. Page 5 Minutes/Edina City Councilffuly 20, 2004 Following a brief discussion Member Masica made a motion granting First Reading of Ordinance No. 2004 -10, establishing a municipal dispensary. Member Hovland seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Hovland, Masica, Maetzold Nays: Housh Motion carried. Member Hovland introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption subject to Ordinance No. 2004 -10 being adopted, seconded by Member Masica: RESOLUTION No. 2004 -65 WHEREAS, the City of Edina by Ordinance No. 2004 -10 permits the establishment of municipal dispensaries of liquor within the City of Edina. . I NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Edina, that on -sale dispensaries for liquor shall be established and limited as described below: 1. Braemar Golf Course Grounds and Clubhouse - limited to the on -sale of 3.2 beer, intoxicating malt liquor and wine; and 2. Fred Richards Golf Course Grounds and Clubhouse - limited to the on -sale of 3.2 beer. Passed and adopted this 20th day of July 2004. Ayes: Hovland, Masica, Maetzold Nays: Housh Motion carried. AWARD OF BID FOR KITCHEN RENOVATION - EDINA SENIOR CENTER Member Hovland asked removal of the Edina Senior Center kitchen renovation from the Consent Agenda to publicly commend Bob Seeger and the Edina Morningside Rotary Clubs, both noon and morning, for their commitment of funds in the amount of $20,000 to aid in the renovation of the Edina Senior Center kitchen. The total amount of the project would be approximately $48,000. Member Hovland made a motion approving the award of bid for the kitchen renovation at the Edina Senior Center to recommended low bidder, Shaw Lundquist in the amount of $20,880.00. Member Housh seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Masica, Maetzold Motion carried. FRONT OFFICE EXPANSION - EDINBOROUGH PARK Manager Hughes explained that "Adventure Peak" the new playground park at Edinborough Park was a huge success necessitating the expansion of the office lobby to accommodate customers. The bid exceeded the budgeted amount of $15,000 in the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and therefore was not placed on the consent agenda. The CIP in total was under budget. Member Masica made a motion approving the award of bid for Edinborough Park's front office expansion to recommended low bidder, Rutledge Construction at $18,440.00. Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Masica, Maetzold Page 6 Minutes/Edina City Council/Tuly 20, 2004 Motion carried. *TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW OF JULY 7, 2004, APPROVED Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Hovland approving the Traffic Safety Staff Review of July 7, 2004, Section A.: 1. Post a "NO PARKING" zone along the north edge of Belmore Lane at the end of the alley between Washington Avenue and Adams Avenue; and Section B. and C. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. RESOLUTION NO 2004 -66 —APPOINTING PRIMARY ELECTION JUDGES Member Housh introduced the following resolution, seconded by Member Hovland and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2004-66 APPOINTING ELECTION JUDGES FOR THE SEPTEMBER 14, 2004 PRIMARY ELECTION WHEREAS, Minnesota Election Law 204B.21 requires that persons serving as election judges be appointed by the Council at least 25 days before the election. BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that the individuals named on Exhibit A, and on file in the office of the City Clerk be appointed as election judges for the primary election to be conducted on September 14, 2004, and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is with this, authorized to make any substitutions or additions as deemed necessary. Passed and adopted by the Edina City Council this 20th day of July, 2004 Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *RESOLUTION NO 2004 -67 - SETTING HEARING DATE OF AUGUST 17, 2004 - ALLEY VACATION (308 BLAKE ROAD) Member Housh introduced the following resolution seconded by Member Hovland and moved its adoption: - - -- - - -- - -- - - - - -- - RESOL --U-T- ION- N0.2004 -67- - - -- -- -- CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON VACATION OF PUBLIC ALLEY RIGHT -OF -WAY ADJACENT TO 308 BLAKE ROAD BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina as follows: 1. It is hereby found and determined that the following described property should be considered for vacation in accordance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 160.29 and 462.348, Subd. 7: 2. This Council shall meet at 7:00 P.M. on the 17TH day of August, 2004, for the purpose of holding a public hearing on whether such vacation shall be made in the interest of the public. 3. The City Clerk is authorized and directed to cause notice of said hearing to be published once a week for two weeks in the Edina Sun - Current, the official newspaper of the City, to post such notice, in at least three public and conspicuous places, as provided in Minnesota Statutes. Such notice shall be in substantially the following form: (Official Publication) Page 7 Minutes/Edina City Council/iuly 20, 2004 CITY OF EDINA 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON VACATION. OF ALLEY RIGHT OF WAY ADJACENT TO 308 BLAKE ROAD IN THE CITY OF EDINA HENNEPIN COUNTY MINNESOTA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota will meet on August 17, 2004, at 7:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers at 4801 West 50th Street for a portion of White Oaks Road roadway right -of -way easements to be vacated: PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PORTION OF ALLEY RIGHT -OF -WAY TO BE VACATED: That part of the sixteen -foot alley adjacent to and between Lots 2,3,8 and 9, Block 4 of Mendelssohn, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Said vacation lies north of the south line of the north 30 feet of said Lot 8 and south of the north line of said Lots 2 and 9. All persons who desire to be heard with respect to the question of whether or not the above proposed street right of way and utility and drainage vacation is in the public interest and should be made shall be heard at said time and place. The Council shall consider the extent to which such proposed street vacation affects existing easements within the area of the proposed vacation and the extent to which the vacation affects the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling electric, telephone or cable television poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or water pipes, mains, and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacation, to continue maintaining the same or to enter upon such easement area or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove, or otherwise attend thereto, for the purpose of specifying, in any such vacation resolution, the extent to which any or all of such easement, and such authority to maintain, and to enter upon the area of the proposed vacation, shall continue. -- - —BY- ORDER- OF -T-HE -EDINA CITTY- COUNCIL - - - -- - - - -- Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Dated: July 19, 2004 Passed and adopted this 20th day of July 2004. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. MUNICIPAL STATE AID SIDEWALK - 4809 TO 4709 WEST 70TH STREET - IMPROVEMENT NO. S -074 Engineer Houle explained the subject area was one of the missing segments of sidewalks located on Municipal State Aid (MSA) roadways. Staff has been working on plans for the missing sidewalk along the southerly side of West 70th Street from the east property line of Arneson Acres Park to the east TH100 frontage road. The proposed sidewalk will provide a safe east -west pedestrian movement along the south side of West 70th Street from the frontage road to West Shore Drive and beyond. Mr. Houle indicated the Council initiated the 2003/2004 Municipal State Aid Sidewalk Study and the 2004 -2008 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for the entrance at Arneson Acres Page 8 Minutes/Edina City Council/iuly 20, 2004 Park. Residents in the area were recently informed of the proposed project. Some affected property owners indicated concern with the project. The total estimated project cost was $113,000 and would be funded thought the Municipal State Aid System funds and the revolving fund as approved in the CIP. If the project was deemed worthy by. the Council, a resolution approving the West 70th Street Sidewalk Improvement, Improvement No. S -074, would need adoption, authorizing plans and specifications to. be completed and bids taken. Mr. Houle added that a small piece of easement on the westerly end of the subject location was acquired in order to complete the sidewalk installation. When a local roadway reaches approximately 750 trips per day, sidewalk installation was recommended to separate pedestrians from vehicles. He explained that the placement of mailboxes in the area does not lend themselves to a curb -style sidewalk. The actual sidewalk would be installed directly behind the mailboxes yet within the right -of -way with the intent of minimizing tree loss. Member Masica asked how many feet of boulevard would be used with installation of the sidewalk. Mr. Houle said approximately nine feet would be used. The City would have a 4 -5 foot grassy strip and a five -foot sidewalk. City crews plow and maintain sidewalks on the State Aid routes with equipment that accommodates the five -foot width. Ms. Masica inquired how many feet of easement would be required for a curb -style sidewalk. Mr. Houle responded that a six inch drop -off would be required with that style of sidewalk and isn't user friendly for sight - challenged or persons in a chair. Ms. Masica asked what portion of the $113,000 was the Arneson Acres project. Mr. Houle said approximately $25,000 -.$30,000. David Hamilton, 4805 West 70th Street, spoke to.. his letter of June 16, 2004, stating his disapproval of the project for various reasons. He stated the nature of this type of project should not be done without consultation. He noted that sidewalk installation at nine feet into his property was ominous and getting into his 'personal space'. He asked that this plan not go forward. - - -- - - - -- Donald Barck,-- 4807- West- -70t-h- Street,- a-- signer._of -the -previously _mentioned _ -Tune . 16,_2004, letter; stated he has been through a lot in his 42 years on 70th. Street. While he knows that his physically challenged neighbor would enjoy the ability to get to the park and beyond, he noted that sidewalks were not a thing of beauty. He asked that the three lots at 4801, 4805 and 4807 be made exempt from the sidewalk project as the area does not warrant the installation and install it on the Arneson Park side of 70th. Ruth Johnson, 4809 West 70th Street, commented that her husband was in favor of the sidewalk as was she. Member Masica asked if there were a lot of walkers going to Christ Presbyterian Church. Mr. Barck remembered when the church was expanding their parking lot, there was talk of NO PARKING on 70th Street. As soon as the expansion was completed parking on 70th was constant as well as a shuttle from the Arneson Acres parking lot. Ms. Masica concluded by saying that installation of sidewalks was a matter of safety. Page 9 Minutes/Edina City Council/Tuly 20, 2004 Mr. Houle added that curb style versus boulevard style could be installed if the US Post Office boxes would be eliminated from the area. He indicated that bids could be solicited for both curb styles. He stated his preference for a boulevard style because it separates the pedestrians from traffic. Member Hovland stated his preference for a boulevard style sidewalk being installed on West 70th Street. After installation, use will increase, especially as a means to traverse to the park. Member Housh indicated this sidewalk would be a tremendous benefit to the three property owners that was installed with State Aid funds and maintained by the City. He suggested tabling the issue for two weeks fo gain a consensus from the neighborhood. Member Masica concurred with installation of the sidewalks. Following a brief discussion, Member Hovland moved to continue the Municipal State Aid Sidewalk, Improvement No. S -074, (4809 to 4709 West 70th Street) to August 3, 2004, directing staff to study options for mail delivery and types of sidewalk. Member Housh seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Masica, Maetzold Motion carried. *CHANGE ORDER APPROVED - VALLEY VIEW ROAD AND WEST 66TH STREET POND DREDGING - CONTRACT NO. 03 -6 (ENGINEERING) Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Hovland authorizing the change order for Valley Road and West 66th Street Pond Dredging Improvements, Contract No. 03 -6 Engineering. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE REVIEW PROCESS APPROVED Mr. Hughes explained ---staff-discussed -alternatives for studying the City's subdivision ordinance during the recently enacted moratorium. A number of options were possible for conducting the study and preparing recommendations: To refer this issue to the Planning Commission and suggest the Commission establish a committee comprising Commission members to undertake the study • The Council could refer this issue to the staff for review and recommendation • To engage a consultant to undertake an independent review and prepare a report with recommended ordinances for consideration • To appoint a task force of residents who have an expertise in fields related to development/ redevelopment for their independent review and recommendations as to subdivision policy Mr. Hughes said after discussing the options, staff believes the last option was most appropriate for the task. A small . task force comprising residents with backgrounds in architecture, law, property appraisal, planning, real estate and similar professions would be ' suited to provide recommendations for Council consideration. Staff believes that appointees Page 10 Minutes/Edina City Council/iuly 20, 2004 must not be directly affected by any pending or contemplated subdivisions. Staff resources to the committee would be provided by the Planning Department. Mr. Hughes suggested the task force be charged with the following: • Review subdivisions approved in recent years pursuant to the existing ordinance • Evaluate the impact of these subdivisions on the character, symmetry and property values in their neighborhoods • Review subdivision ordinances of other similar communities • Recommend changes to our ordinance if warranted The goal of the task force would be to complete their work and report to the Council by years end. He added that names of recommended potential individuals to serve on the task force could be presented at the next Council meeting. Member Hovland indicated his preference with two suggestions, 1) engaging a consultant and 2) appointing a task force of expert residents. Mayor Maetzold concurred with the suggestion. Member Masica inquired whether an outside consultant would have access to other communities' ordinances. Mr. Hughes noted that an outside consultant would have a greater ability to do this type of research. Ms. Masica said she wished the study could be examined by the Planning Commission, staff and back to the Council. Member Housh explained he was in favor of a consultant being involved in the process. He added that his hope was that anything that was troubling the Planning Commission with their ability to enforce the ordinances, could be part of the task force study. Mr. Hughes said the most time- consuming part of this process would be to get proposals back from consultants. He stated that this could be back on the Council agenda for the second - - -- -- -- meeting in- August. - -- Member Hovland made a motion directing staff to receive proposals from consultants and present interested, qualified residents who would be willing to serve on a task force that would examine the City of Edina's Subdivision Ordinance and be back for approval by the Council on August 17, 2004. Member Housh seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Masica, Maetzold Motion carried. GREATER SOUTHDALE AREA STUDY PROCESS APPROVED Mr. Hughes indicated that the Hennepin County Board has approved a cost sharing agreement and the planning study with respect to the Greater Southdale area is underway. Kick -off meetings with consultants have taken place and a planning process will go forward over approximately the next eight months. Three committees will assist in the study: Page 11 Minutes/Edina City Council/f my 20, 2004 No formal Council action was taken. *CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Member Housh made a motion and Member Hovland seconded the motion approving payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated July 7, 2004, and consisting of 32 pages: General Fund $320,627.96; Communications Fund . $4,997.11; Working Capital Fund $57,590.70; Construction Fund $543.14, Art Center Fund $2,065.56; Golf Dome Fund $1,286.47; Aquatic Center Fund $7,468.14, Golf Course Fund $21,088.56; Ice Arena Fund $30,015.28; Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fund $25,389.40; Liquor Fund $220,639.09, Utility Fund $54,380.20; Storm Sewer Fund $6,157.86; Recycling Fund $32,171.80; PSTF Fund $726.87 TOTAL $785,148.14; and for approval of payment of claims dated July 14, 2004, and consisting of 32 pages: General Fund $220,281.69, Communications Fund $1,739.50; Working Capital Fund $164,310.36; Art Center Fund $2,188.35; Golf Dome Fund $129.65; Aquatic Center Fund $25,457.69; Golf Course Fund $44,283.67; Ice Arena Fund $5,652.44; Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fund $7,679.36; Liquor Fund $131,545.20; Utility Fund $34,958.80, Storm Sewer Fund $1,142.47, Recycling Fund $3,122.15; PSTF Agency Fund $4,463.76; TOTAL $646,955.09. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT (CAFR) FOR 2003 RECEIVED Director Wallin presented Edina's Comprehensive Annual Financial Statement (CAFR) for 2003 and commented that again this year, no management letter was received from the Auditors with concerns or suggested changes to the City of Edina's financial system. The format of the 2004 CAFR is somewhat different because of changes brought about by GASB 34 the new Federal Accounting System. Following a brief Council discussion, positive Council acclimation of the Financial/ Audit process were given, and Member. Hovland made a motion approving receipt of the Comprehensive Annual Financial Statement (CAFR) for 2003, as presented. Member Housh seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Masica, Maetzold Motion carried. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Maetzold declared the meeting adjourned at 9:55 P.M. City Clerk Page 13 I Consent Item II. A. LOCATION MAP Case Number: LD -04 -6 Location: 7000 Tupa Dr & 6909 St. Patrick's Lane Request: Lot Division DRAFT MINUTES PC MEETING JULY 28, 2004 LD -04 -6 John Wright, 7000 Tupa Drive Joel and Amy Anderson, 6909 St. Patrick's Lane Mr. Larsen informed the Commission the proponents are requesting to transfer a part of an existing Outlot from the St. Patrick's Lane lot to the Tupa Drive lot. The parcel measures approximately 40 feet by 87 feet. The parcel is part of a steep hillside, sloping from north to south. Mr. Larsen concluded staff recommends approval. Commissioner Workinger questioned if Outlots are taxed differently from "regular lots ". Mr. Larsen responded they are taxed differently. Outlots are considered "unbuildable" and are taxed to reflect that. Commissioner Swenson moved to recommend lot division approval. Commissioner Fischer seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. 04/16 Regular Meeting of the Edina Planning Commission Wednesday, July 28, 2004 7:00 PM Edina City Hall Council Chambers 4801 West 50th Street Case File: LD -04 -6 Location: 7000 Tupa Drive, and 6909 St. Patrick's Lane Applicant: John Wright 7000 Tupa Drive Owners: John Wright, 7000 Tupa Drive, and Joel and Amy Anderson, 6909 St. Patrick's Lane Request: Transfer a part of an existing Outlot from the St. Patrick's Lane lot to the Tupa Drive lot. The parcel measures approximately 40 feet by 87 feet. The parcel is part of a steep hillside, sloping from north to south. Recommendation: Staff recommends approval. Outlots are by definition unbuildable. Therefore no new development rights are implied. The parcel will be a positive addition to the Tupa lot without damaging the use of the St Patrick's lot Planning Department Request We, the residents of 7000 Tupa Drive, are asking the Planning Department of the City of Edina for permission to acquire a portion of an outlot that belongs to Joel and Amy Anderson, the residents of 6909 St. Patrick's Lane. This outlot is uniquely described as its own entity and with a distinct property identification of 06- 116 -21 -44 -0055. The two parties involved have not yet discussed a purchase price or transaction date but certainly hope to do so after the Planning Department has granted us permission to move forward. The attached legal description from land surveyor Frank Cardarelle specifies which section of the outlot we are referring to. The portion of the outlot that is not described will remain the property of Joel and Amy Anderson of 6909 St. Patrick's Lane. We have also included the relevant Hennepin County records to assist you in this process. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 952 -943- 1446. Thank you for your attention to this situation and we look forward to hearing from you! FRANK R. CARDARELLE (612) 941 -3031 Land Surveyor Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Ctrtilitaft Of f urtq Survey For John Wright Book Page File S4 83 7000 Tupa Drive Edina Scale:l " =30' r8/ 9719 North line of South 210 feet, Outlot 1 d ' 9 North line of Outlot 1 0 South line of North 50 feet of Outlot 1 I 20 I 41. D Existing House O No. 7000 2 ,6 No . 70041 Z¢.S 6 B. E �✓ /YF / E 1A q f M W — . 1 Description: The East ?3, S 87.19 feet of that 6o '4 op�q part of Outlot 1, Elm 12:7 View 1st Addition lying South of the North 50.0 feet there - TUPA DRIVE of, and lying North of the South 210.0 feet thereof. Together with Lot 7, Block 1, Braemar Hills Fifth Addition. IMrobyar*nvrdd.a•vu tr odvmwtr.pr..wddmofaunwdtlrbvxmwd above described ar&�'e Hr.W* cm*, MkWa.h nd tlr N..tlm da Q •� v hmwb,tlr.M m..W Ivd s,,,,,.v.d by m. a, dd. 1 6th d.y m J u 1 v 2004 C___;.0 Frank R. Cardarelle State Reg. No. 6508 WILLIAM D. SCHOELL REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER MILAN. NO. 2263 SO. OAK 733 WIS. NO. E-6176 FLORIDA .NO. 6271 NO. OAK. 622 MONT. NO. fS16 -E �W CAW .. A. 1 J copll� SCHOELL - & MADSON, INC. ENGINEERS a SURVEYORS 30 MONTH AVENUE SOUTH HOPKINS. MINNESOTA PHONE: 938.7601 CERTIFICATE OF-SURVEY v vo %# G5'-y. -7 `- CARLISLE MADSON REGISTERED LAND SURVETO HIM"- NO. 4374 SO. OAK. 791 MIS. NO. 6-674 IOWA NO. 3706 NO. OAK. I son WONT. NO. 2742-0 FOR. Jrj&4rjqs CD/VS7''h'llCi' /OJT/ C� ._ _139_ /9 -- t9l;r31 30 t air O�lVE 3o B %ac.(fo,� BENCHMAA7. -- ToP o/' f/yd. on �cnirsar: coi-rz,er 4,1- Zo/- 7 /terra Orn�/7?) �/ e - Oerrofes ii�/r /r�cvne/rf set O-LZ -/mss hr •/77,0/7( /72L -V7f /,ounce - �- Oe/�ofes wood stake # - Z;Im7oles hydrzr/rf IY�, . � x�g927J - o�nv�'es exsf_ e %i f IJ 0� � 3 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF A SURVEY OF THE BOUNDARIES OF. Got 7, B /a1,� 1, Brae/rrar- H %�s Fif�i Addii�iorr AND OF THE LOCATION OF ALL BUILDINGS. IF ANY. THEREON. AND ALL VISIBLE ENCROACHMENTS. IF ANY. FROM OR ON SAID LAND. AS SURVEYED BY ME THIS 2'S DAY OF �Gt�y 19 7Z It also shows the /ovation of fhe a P/-o�aos� bui /dhy. MCEIVED II�ItE t$. iRr,NOSURVEYOR APPR,0' Bl JILDING NSP CTOR MILL AGE OE-WINA �/ e - Oerrofes ii�/r /r�cvne/rf set O-LZ -/mss hr •/77,0/7( /72L -V7f /,ounce - �- Oe/�ofes wood stake # - Z;Im7oles hydrzr/rf IY�, . � x�g927J - o�nv�'es exsf_ e %i f IJ 0� � 3 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT REPRESENTATION OF A SURVEY OF THE BOUNDARIES OF. Got 7, B /a1,� 1, Brae/rrar- H %�s Fif�i Addii�iorr AND OF THE LOCATION OF ALL BUILDINGS. IF ANY. THEREON. AND ALL VISIBLE ENCROACHMENTS. IF ANY. FROM OR ON SAID LAND. AS SURVEYED BY ME THIS 2'S DAY OF �Gt�y 19 7Z It also shows the /ovation of fhe a P/-o�aos� bui /dhy. MCEIVED II�ItE t$. iRr,NOSURVEYOR �1��1� ow e AGENDA ITEM: II.B. SET HEARING DATE - AUGUST 17, 2004 AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE - FLOODPLAIN REGULATIONS and PRELIMINARY REZONING/ PRELIMINARY PLAT — 5125 49TH STREET WEST (Mark Jones /Thea Lucy Marshall) Z No packet data F-1 Oral presentation F-1 Information coming im • l�.r vim• REPORURE C OMMENDATI ON To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item III.A. From: GORDON L. HUGHES Consent El CITY MANAGER Information Only ❑ Date: AUGUST 3, 2004 Mgr. Recommends El To. HRA ® To Council Subject:. ORDINANCE. NO. 2004-10 ❑ Motion ESTABLISHING A ❑ Resolution MUNICIPAL DISPENSARY ®. Ordinance ❑ Discussion RECOMMENDATION: Grant Second Reading. - INFORMATION/BACKGROUND: The City Council granted First Reading of the subject Ordinance at the July 20, 2004, meeting. Staff recommends Second Reading. 1 ORDINANCE NO. 2004-10 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SUBSECTIONS 900.02, 900.03 and 1230.02 OF THE CITY CODE — MUNICIPAL LIQUOR DISPENSARY The City Council of the City of Edina ordains: Section 1. Subsection 900.02 of the City Code is amended to read as follows: 11900.02 Off -Sale Limited to Municipal Liquor Stores; Dispensary Established. No intoxicating liquor, intoxicating malt liquor or wine shall be sold, or caused to be sold at off -sale within the City by any person, or by any store or establishment, or by any agent or employee of such person, store or establishment, except by the City and on the premises in the City occupied by the municipal liquor dispensary for the off -sale of liquor and wine. There is hereby established a municipal liquor dispensary for the off -sale and on -sale of liquor and wine. The dispensary shall be located at such suitable places in the City as the Council determines by resolution. Subd. 1 Off -Sale Dispensary. The following shall apply to the municipal liquor dispensary for the off -sale of liquor and wine: A. The dispensary shall be under the control of the Manager. The Manager may appoint employees as deemed necessary to operate the dispensary in full compliance with this Section and State Law. No person under the State established legal drinking age shall be employed in the dispensary. B. The Manager may require persons employed in the dispensary to furnish a surety bond to the City in the same manner as prescribed by Subsection 115.12 of this Code. C. Subject to the requirements of M.S. 340A.504, the hours of operation and the dispensary shall be established by resolution of the Council. D. All restrictions as to the manner of conducting sales as set forth in Subsection 900.10 except Subd. 7 thereof shall apply to the dispensary. Subd. 2. On -Sale Dispensary. All restrictions as to the manner of conducting sales as set forth in subsections 900.10, 900.11 and 900.12 shall apply to the municipal liquor dispensary for the on -sale of liquor and wine." Section 2. Subsection 900.03 of the City Code is amended to read as follows: 11900.03 License Required. No person, except wholesalers or manufacturers to the extent authorized by law, directly or indirectly, upon any pretense or by any device, shall sell at off -sale any 3.2, percent malt liquor or at on -sale any 3.2 percent malt liquor, intoxicating malt liquor, wine or intoxicating liquor without first having obtained a license, other than sales by the City at its municipal liquor dispensary." Section 3. Subd. 4 of Subsection 900.09 of the City Code shall be amended to read as follows: "Subd. 4. Wine Licenses. In addition to the requirements of Subd. 1 of this Subsection, no Wine License shall be granted to any establishment other than a restaurant located in the PCD -1, PCD -2, PCD -3 Subdistricts, the Mixed Development District or the Planned Office District." Section 4 Paragraph 0.3 of Subsection 1230.02 of the City" Code shall be amended to read as follows: 3. 3.2 percent malt liquor, wine and intoxicating malt liquor which is dispensed by the City or by an agent of the City at, an on -sale dispensary authorized pursuant to Subsection 900.02 may be consumed subject to other applicable provisions of this Code and subject to the rules and regulations of the Park Director pursuant to Subsection 1230.06 on the grounds of Braemar Golf Course. 3.2 percent malt liquor which is dispensed by the City or by an agent of the City at an on -sale dispensary authorized pursuant to Subsection 900.02 may be consumed subject to other applicable provisions of this Code and subject to the rules and regulations of the Park Director pursuant to Subsection 1230.06 on the grounds of Fred Richards Golf Course." Section 5. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon passage and publication. First Reading: Second Reading: Publication Attest: City Clerk Mayor 2 REPORUREC OMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item W.A. From: Consent ❑ GORDON L. HUGHES CITY MANAGER Information Only ❑ Date: AUGUST 3, 2004 Mgr. Recommends. ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: 44TH AND FRANCE El Motion BACKGROUND REPORT ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance. ® Discussion INFORMATIONBACKGROUND:. On July 6, 2004, a number of residents from the Morningside neighborhood appeared before the Council for the purpose of discussing the 40 and France commercial area redevelopment plan adopted in 1990. The Council directed staff to prepare a background report concerning this plan for its review at the August 3, 2004, meeting. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS/DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CREATED In 1989/1990, the City Council initiated a planning effort for the purpose of establishing tax increment financing districts ( "TIF districts ") encompassing three neighborhood commercial districts in the City - 441h and France, Wooddale/Valley View and 70th /Cahill. (TIF districts had previously been established at 50th and France and Grandview as well as Edinborough and Centennial Lakes.) In order to establish these new TIF districts, the City needed to prepare plans, budgets, property acquisition plans and other documents as required by law. Once adopted, tax growth (i.e. the "increment ") resulting from new development/redevelopment within the TIF district would be captured by the City for a number of years and used to pay for eligible public costs authorized by the development plan. Such costs could include property acquisition costs and developer incentives, as well as public improvement costs such as landscaping and parking. improvements. The three TIF districts noted above together comprised a "Development District." Under the terms of the Development .District, tax increments collected in any of the three TIF districts could 'be pooled for the purpose of undertaking eligible projects anywhere within the Development District. On April 2, 1990, the City Council conducted a public hearing and established the TIF districts as well as the Development District. Attached herewith are copies of the following to assist you in understanding the thought process of the Council in establisliing these districts: • City Council minutes and staff reports from 1990. The Development District Program and Tax Increment Plan. (Please note that I have not included the Wooddale/Valley View and the 70th /Cahill portions of the plan, but can provide those later if requested.) A copy of the Edina Sun Current article from March 28, 1990, which discussed the proposed plan. WHY THE COUNCIL ESTABLISHED THESE DISTRICTS In reviewing Council minutes and based upon my personal recollection, the Council at that time was very interested in initiating improvements to the three neighborhood retail districts in the City. The Council had previously established TIF districts at 50th and France and Grandview and was pleased with the tools afforded by TIF and the results. It is clear that the Council feared the prospect of adverse legislation that would limit the City's ability to establish TIF districts in the future. (As explained below, the Council was correct in this fear.). Therefore, the Council was interested in creating TIF districts expeditiously, particularly before the end of the 1990 legislative session. In minutes of meetings from that time, Council members spoke of a `window of opportunity that exists today but might not exist in the future." I recommend that you read in particular the attached March 19, 1990 and April 2, 1990, meeting minutes to get a full flavor of the discussion and deliberation. TIF DISTRICTS DECERTIFIED Shortly after establishment of the TIF districts and the Development District, the State of Minnesota enacted a law requiring that certain actions immediately occur in such TIF districts in order to maintain their status. Required actions included sale of bonds, acquisition of property or other physical activities. Such actions were not undertaken in the 44th and France or the Valley View/Wooddale TIF districts. Therefore, these TIF districts "decertified" in 1991 and no tax increments were ever collected. Qualifying activities did occur in the 70th and Cahill district and, therefore, this district was able to collect tax increments for the following eight years or so. d* As noted above, increments collected in any of the three TIF districts can be used for eligible public purposes throughout the entire Development District. Therefore, 70th and Cahill increments could be used at 44th and France or Wooddale/Valley View. The Council elected to use such increments for the acquisition of.the service station in the Wooddale/Valley View area. This acquisition and related costs have exhausted all but 'about $280,000 of such funds. 2 Therefore, no tax increments have been collected from the 44th and France TIF district and limited increments are available from other TIF districts to implement any of the property acquisitions or other eligible public costs contemplated by the 446h and France redevelopment plan. DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT REMAINS IN EFFECT Even though the 44h and France TIF district was decertified, the Development District encompassing this area remains in effect. Under the terms of the Development District, the City remains empowered to carry out the development "program" authorized by the Development District even though no funds currently _ exist for that purpose at 44`h and France except for leftover 70`h /Cahill increments. The key elements of the development program included the acquisition and resale of private property for development/ redevelopment, interest assistance, demolition, relocation and the construction of public improvements such as parking, landscaping and utilities. Pursuant to State law, the City enjoys certain powers and authorities within development districts that it does not have elsewhere. 1n particular, these powers include the authority to acquire property by eminent domain for subsequent resale and private development and the implementation of the elements of the development program noted above. Ordinarily, the City can use its power of eminent domain only to acquire property for public use, . e.g. streets, parks, utility easements and so forth. Development districts are common in the City. In fact, essentially all of the retail districts in the City are located_ within development or. redevelopment districts. In addition to the subject Development District, the City or its HRA have created districts that remain in effect encompassing 50th and France,. Grandview as well as the greater Southdale area (France Avenue to the east City limits from the Crosstown to the south City limits.) DEVELOPMENT/REDEVELOPMENT PLANS INCLUDED IN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN In 1992, the City prepared and adopted an updated Comprehensive Plan pursuant to State law. (Comprehensive Plans are required to be updated every 10 years for cities in the metropolitan area.) At that time, the staff recommended, and the Council concurred, that the development/redevelopment plans for 40 and France as well as the other retail districts in the City should be included in the updated Comprehensive Plan. The staff s logic at the time was that the land use plans which were prepared as part of the Development District establishment could provide valuable guidance to the City when reviewing future private development proposals for properties within the commercial areas. This recommendation and decision was made even though two of the TIF districts had been decertified the prior year and the City therefore lacked the fiscal tools necessary to implement the plan as originally authorized. The Comprehensive Plan was updated in 2002 and again the development/redevelopment plans for the retail districts were adopted by reference and remain part of the Comprehensive Plan today. IMPLEMENTATION OF REDEVELOPMENT PLANS OR DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS 3 Even though the Development District continues to exist, the 1990 redevelopment plan could not be put into place without notice to nearby property owners or without Council deliberation. Development or redevelopment of private property frequently requires that the City rezone the property in question. Even if a rezoning is not required, the City Code requires Council approval of new buildings or the expansion of existing .buildings by more than 10 percent in floor area. In addition, new or renovated buildings in development districts typically require variances for pre- existing nonconforming situations such as parking quantity, setbacks and so forth. In all of the above situations, public hearings are required prior io City approval. State law also closely regulates the City's exercise of its power of eminent domain. In order to proceed with a condemnation, the Council must adopt the dopropriate resolutions and filings with the court. A panel of disinterested experts is appointed by the court and is charged with establishing the value of the property and awarding the price that must be paid by the condemning authority. In, addition, the property owner is often eligible for reimbursement for relocation expenses and other damages. In my experience in Edina, property owners typically receive generous awards from condemnation panels. However, I would acknowledge that such proceedings oftentimes are very stressful and unsettling to those involved. To the best of my knowledge, the City or its HRA has never used its power of eminent domain (or the threat thereof) to acquire any residence in the City except for the purpose of constructing a street or establishing a park. The City/HRA has acquired commercial property for redevelopment, although it has been used sparingly in comparison with many other cities. ALTERNATIVES At the July 6h meeting, neighborhood representatives offered a number of recommendations with respect to the 44th and France plan. The Council could consider the following alternatives: 1. Eliminate 44th and France from the Development District. The Council could amend the Development District by eliminating the 44 1h and France project area. The City Attorney advises that the Council can adopt such an amendment by resolution, with or without a public hearing as determined by the Council. If the Development District were so amended, the City would relinquish its authority to implement the development program for the 44h and France area. Specifically, it could not acquire property for subsequent redevelopment, provide interest assistance, demolish buildings or take other actions over and above those ordinarily authorized for cities by State law. This action would prohibit the City from exercising the right of eminent domain except for the acquisition of private property for public uses. 2. Amend the Development District by Removing Single Family Properties. One of the principal concerns expressed by residents on July 6t was the prospect of the City condemning single - family homes. If the Council wished, it could amend the 440' and France project area by eliminating all single - family properties. This action would allow the City to retain authority with respect to the non - residential properties. However, no development program activities including condemnation could be carried out with respect to existing residential properties. The process for such an amendment would be identical to that noted above. 4 P 3 Amend the Comprehensive Plan by Deleting Reference to the 44th and France Redevelopment Plan. As noted earlier, the City's Comprehensive Plan adopted, by reference, the development/redevelopment plans for 44th and France as well as Wooddale/Valley View, 70th/ Cahill, Grandview and 50th and France. In addition to amending the Development Districts as noted above, the Council could also amend the Comprehensive Plan by deleting the specific reference to 40 and France. From a process standpoint, amendments to the Comprehensive Plan are more complicated than amendments to the Development District.- If the City elected to do this, such a plan amendment would need to originate at the Planning Commission and then be considered at a public hearing by the Council. If adopted, the amendment would need to be reviewed and approved by the Metropolitan Council before final adoption by the City Council. As part of its review process, the Metropolitan Council will require that the plan amendment be submitted to the City of Minneapolis and Edina Public Schools for review and comment. When reviewing the proposed amendment, the Metropolitan Council will consider i) conformity to regional "systems" e.g. sewers, highways, airports etc. ii) consistency with other metropolitan plans, and iii) compatibility with plans of adjacent communities and the school district. I would be surprised if the Metropolitan Council had any substantive concerns regarding such an amendment. If the Council amended the Comprehensive Plan as described above, any private development proposals for property in the commercial area would be evaluated in light of the overall policy statements and land use graphic of the Comprehensive Plan. Such statements and graphics are much more general in nature than that contained in the 44th and France redevelopment plan. For example, one of the policy statements in the Comprehensive Plan is to "provide appropriate buffering at the perimeter of commercial areas." The Council would of course need to interpret and apply general policies such as this one when evaluating the merits of any future development proposals. he specific elements of the 44th and France plan would not be available for Council consideration if deleted, from the Comprehensive Plan. 4 No Amendment to Development District or Comprehensive Plan. The Council, of course, need not take any action on the Development District or Comprehensive Plan at the present time. 5 94' 1/2/90 Manager Rosland said that, basically, honing down the wish list is the direction staff would want to take. However, when this study was started each facility's staff was asked to "give us your dreams" and that it was important to let.the plan breath. Obviously, then hard facts and figures must be applied to bring some sanity to it. Member Kelly commented that the Park and Recreation budget is approximately 13% of the .total City Budget which includes the central services appropriation. The Council should look at the percentage of the City's budget that goes to. Park and Recreation and how that meets the demands of the residents. Also, any way to 'generate.revenue should be considered to promote a "pay for itself" policy. Walter San dison, 4612 W. 58th Street, commented that file had talked with Commissioner Keefe who indicated that the City contributes roughly 10% of the -- budget. for the -Hennepin .County - Parks. ,__Commissioner. Keefe had suggested that the City of Edina get some representation on that Board as we receive nothing in return.. Mayor Richards said he would convey to the Park Board the comments and concerns of the Council. and would report back as to the outcome of the January 16 meeting of the Park Board. PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT DISTRICTING OUTLINED Mayor Richards referred to the December 14, 1989 memorandum regarding commercial area redevelopment and the December 27, 1989 memorandum outlining a preliminary work program from Gordon Hughes, HRA Executive Director summarized as follows. T.I.F. District Establishment: 1) Establish T.I.F. districts no later than March 19, 1990. 2) Establish economic development, T.I.F. districts for all retail areas. After establishment, attempt to upgrade all or part of some of these districts to redevelopment districts. 3) Attempt to establish T.I.F. districts such that increments can be "pooled" among all these districts. Development /Redevelopment Plans: During the process of establishing the T.I.F. districts, work will start on preparing detailed development and redevelopment plans. This will include contacts with tenants and property owners, preparation of ,land use alternative and public improvement plans and detailed finance plans. This work will require assistance of the hiring or contracting of- - Planning consultant(s) to prepare land use and public improvement plans - Project manager to interface with tenants and property owners, planning consultants, and potential developers /redevelopers. This individual could be a part -time contractual employee. Planning Costs: No estimates for costs of establishing the districts have been developed. Such costs must be borne by the City until tax increments are generated by the districts which.then can be used to repay City costs. Member Paulus asked at what point in time we would hire the planning consultant(s) and project manager and what cost the City will incur if this goes no where. Manager Rosland said that the planning consultant(s) will be involved in preparation of the required plan describing proposed development activities, public costs and impacts on other taxing jurisdictions.. The project manager would be involved after the districts have been established. Executive Director Hughes explained that no cost estimates have as yet been made. The City would incur legal and other expenses in the initial work regardless of whether the districts are established which roughly could be $25,000. 1 1 1 /L /Yu +' 195 Member Kelly asked how the districts would be affected by the tax law relating to homestead credits and in particular Centennial Lake s /Edinborough. Director Hughes explained that prior to the 1989 tax law the state paid homestead credit, that typically is shared among all the taxing jurisdictions, in tax increment districts went 100% back to the district. Accordingly, each unit of home ownership property in these districts received a state paid credit. Under the 1989 tax law, homestead credit was replaced with transition aid and disappeared. Through the wording of the new law that transition aid does not get credited 100% back to the. districts. Instead it flows out, essentially, to school districts. Part of it is made up in that the City's levy in essence is being increased to make .up for the lost homestead credit. So within the tax increment districts we will at least capture the City's share and to a certain extent we will capture the county's share. From a capital standpoint, the bottom line is that the City will get only a portion of that homestead credit received in prior years and.that it had hoped to get in future years out of these districts. Centennial Lakes /Edinborough will be impacted the most because of the large amount of homo(stead property in the district. Director Hughes noted that the pay 1990 taxes is the first year that the City will suffer-from this problem and it would take special legislation to restore the credit. It was the consensus of the Council that staff should proceed with the preliminary work program as outlined to establish.tax increment financing districts for the retail areas identified. ETHNIC CELEBRATION TO BE HELD ON 1/21/90 Noah Hurley, Chair, Human Relations Commission, reminded the Council Members that their presence at the Edina Community Meeting to be held at Braemar on January 21, 1990 will be greatly appreciated. He thanked the Council for their support and said the steering committee has done an outstanding job in preparing for this event and asked that this become an annual event. On behalf of the Council, Mayor Richards expressed thanks to Mr. Hurley and Dorie Barman, members of the Human Relations Commission, for their efforts. He asked that following the event they give the Council their candid comments.as to future events. *RESOLUTION ADOPTED DESIGNATING DEPOSITORIES FOR PUBLIC FUNDS OF CITY Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice for adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION DESIGNATING DEPOSITORIES BE IT RESOLVED that the First Edina National Bank, Edina, MN, First Southdale National Bank, Edina, MN, Americana State Bank of Edina, Edina, MN, Southwest Fidelity State Bank, Edina, MN, First National Bank of Minneapolis, Minneapolis, MN, Marquette Bank Minneapolis, Minneapolis, MN and Norwest Bank MetroQest, Edina, MN, authorized to do banking business in Minnesota, be and hereby are designated as Official Depositories for the Public Funds of the City of Edina., County of Hennepin, Minnesota, until January 1, 1991. Resolution adopted on rollcall vote, five ayes. *SIGNATORY RESOLUTION ADOPTED Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice for adoption of the following resolution: SIGNATORY RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED that the persons holding office as Mayor, Manager and Treasurer of the City of Edina, be, and they hereby are, authorized to act for this municipality in the transaction of any banking business with First National Bank, First Southdale National Bank, Americana State Bank of Edina, Southwest Fidelity State Bank, First National Bank of Minneapolis, Marquette Bank Minneapolis and Norwest Bank MetroWest (hereinafter referred to as the "Bank ") from time to time and until written notice to any Bank to the contrary, to sign checks against said accounts, which checks will be signed by the Mayor, Manager and City Treasurer. F + MINUTES S EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FEBRUARY 5, 1990 Answering rollcall were Commissioners Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and Chairman Richards. MINUTES of the BRA Meeting of January 22, 1990, were approved as submitted by motion of Commissioner Smith seconded by Commissioner Rice. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. ESTABLISHMENT OF T.I.F. DISTRICTS FOR RETAIL -AREAS PROCEEDING. Executive Director-.-- Cordon Hughes reported that work is progressing on establishment of Tax Increment Financing Districts. A preliminary review of the.plans by Council will be held on March 19, 1990, then will proceed to the Planning Commission on March 28, 1990, and to Council on April 2, 1990, for a public hearing. Chairman Richards opened up the meeting for discussion to the audience. The Council has felt that exploration should.be done regarding establishing the tax increment financing districts in the City where there are none now. Three areas were focused on:. 1. Valley View and Wooddale 2. 70th and Cahill 3. 44th and France The City has hired a consultant for the purpose of laying. out a schedule /framework to consider the issue of whether or not to establish tax increment financing districts in these areas. Chairman Richards stated that on March 19, 1990, the HRA, will look at the proposed plan, 1) to see if there is any reason to establish these districts, 2) to solicit input from residents, property owners, or business people in . these areas. One hearing is before the Planning Commission on March 28, 1990, held at City Hall in the Manager's Conference Room. The second public hearing will be April 2, 1990, in the Council Chambers to hear discussion on these proposals. After these meetings the Council will make a decision. Input will be welcomed from the public._ Chairman Richards encouraged the audience to mark their calendars with these dates. , A brief discussion followed. Executive Director Hughes commented that property owners in the three districts will be getting a notice of a February 27, 1990.,. informal review. Tenants are welcome but will not receive individual notices. The owner /manager of the Edina Baskin & Robbins questioned whether businesses would have to move, would businesses have to improve. the area or what the Commissioners have in mind. Also, if this is for only the property owners or tenants also. He questioned the time frame - would it be 5 - 10 years? Chairman Richards answered that nothing has been decided. Whether the districts will even be established is up for conjecture. We have been able to see how these tax increments have allowed the City and HRA to do projects such as at 50th & France, at.Vernon and at.Southdale /Edinborough /Centennial Lakes. This tool allows the public sector to get involved and work with the private property owners to see what options may exist. Chairman Richards commented that the time could be 5 - 15 ,f H.R.A. Minutes - 2/5/90 Page ,2 • years depending on the laws, which are always subject to change by the legislature. If nothing is done, the City may be missing an opportunity. Executive Director Hughes.stated that experience has shown that these commercial redevelopment projects go in stages; for instance 50th & France where the. initial project was done in 1914, followed -up in 1979, and another project in 1990 is being considered. Chairman Richards again mentioned the dates when establishment of the tax increment districts would be considered as February 20, 1990, March 28, 1990, April 2, 1990. Questions are to be directed to Director Hughes at City Hall. BID AWARDED FOR GRADING - CENTENNIAL LAKES CONDOMINIUNS Motion was made by Commissioner Smith for award of bid for Centennial Lakes Residential Amenities to recommended low bidder, Steinninger Construction, at $9,600.00. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Rice. Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards. Motion carried. BOND ISSUES FOR TAX INCREMENT DISTRICTS - EDINBOROUCH AND 50TH & FRANCE DISCUSSED Jerry Gilligan, City Bond Counsel., referred to his memorandum of February 2, 1990, in which he stated that the Edina HRA has two tax increment financing districts created prior to August 1, 1979, 50th & France and Edinborough. The Edinborough district includes a portion of the Centennial Lakes project. Under the Tax Increment Financing Act, increment from pre - August 1, 1979 districts have an outside termination date of August 1, 2009. After April 1, 2001, increment from pre- August 1, 1979, districts may only be used to pay bonds which were outstanding on April 1, 1990. Although the 50th & France district is.technically affected by this restriction, the Edinborough district is more greatly affected in that significant future phases of the Centennial Lakes development may occur. Centennial Lakes is composed of two tax increment financing districts, Edinborough and Centennial Lakes. Bonds issued since the establishment of the Centennial Lakes district (Bonds issued in 1988 and 1989) are payable from tax increment from both districts: If additional tax increment bonds are issued for Centennial Lakes after rr-i-1-- i- - 99a,---tax- 4w-r emeri "- rom=- t-he- Edinber- eugh -d�� y- -- such bonds until April 1, 2001. The loss of the ability to use increment from the Edinborough district after April 1, 2001, to pay debt service on bonds issued after April. 1, 1990, could limit the ability of the HRA to finance additional public costs for the Centennial Lakes development. The HRA may consider two options in an attempt to more fully utilize tax increment from the Edinborough district after April 1, 2001. Both involve issuance and closing of bonds by the City prior to April 1, 1990. 1. Issue refunding bonds to refund the bonds issued in 1981 and 1986, payable from tax increment from the Edinborough district, and push out the final maturity of these bonds until after April 1, 2001. The result is more debt service payable from the district, but frees up increment prior to it 1 2001 that would otherwise have been used to pay the principal of the Apr I , refunded bonds. This freed up increment is then available to pay for Centennial Lakes.project costs. This is a technique recently used by Minneapolis. This may be an option to consider independent of financing s MINUTES OF THE JOINT MEETING OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY /CITY COUNCIL HELD AT EDINA CITY HALL MARCH 19, 1990 A joint meeting of'the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority and the City Council was convened to consider concurrently: 1) Preliminary Report on Tax Increment Districts and 2) Extension of Resolution - Acquisition of Kunz Oil /Lewis Engineering Properties. Action was taken by the HRA and Council as recorded. RO Answering rollcall were Commissioners /Members Rice, Smith, Richards. Commissioner /Member Paulus entered the meeting at 7:12 p.m. MINUTES of the Joint BRA /Council Meeting of March 5, 1990 were approved as submitted by motion.of Commissioner Smith, seconded by Commissioner Rice. Ayes: Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried-.- -- — pRE103 iNARY REPORT PRESENTED ON TAX INCREMENT DISTRICTS• PUBLIC HEARING TO BE HELD ON 4/2/90 HRA Executive Director Gordon Hughes stated that in accordance with the Council's request, staff has prepared draft plans supporting the establishment of tax increment financing districts. at Valley View Road and Wooddale Avenue, 44th Street and France Avenue, and 70th Street and Cahill Road. These preliminary plans have been prepared with the assistance of the Hoisington Group, planning consultant. J. Peter Meyers has also assisted staff in discussions with the business community. The plans are in the draft stage and the staff and consultant seek comment and direction concerning them from the HRA Commissioners. Plan Preparation and Review Process - Prior, to commencing plan preparation, staff and the consultant met individually with the five. or six key business persons from each of the three retail area. The purpose was to obtain their comments and recommendations concerning the area `and to determine if they had particular plans relating to their businesses. Subsequently, the consultant prepared preliminary land use and public improvement plans. On February 27, 1990 staff and the consultant conducted an open meeting with each of the three retail areas. The preliminary plans were presented and comments and recommendations were received from those in attendance. On February 28, 1990 the preliminary plans were presented to the Community Development and Planning Commission for informal review. Following these meetings, the consultant revised and refined the land use plans. At the same time, staff has drafted the narrative that will accompany the plans. The City's legal counsel is presently in the process of preparing the legal documents necessary for district establishment. Executive Director Hughes said that the purpose of the preliminary report at this meeting is to obtain comments and recommendations so that any revisions to these plans can be made prior to the public hearing on April 2, 1990. Individuals who were in attendance at the February 27, 1990. meeting have been invited as well as other individuals who have called to inquire about the plans. The Community Development and Planning Commission will again review the plans on March 28,.1990 and, hopefully, will pass a recommendation on to the Council. Status of Tax Increment Financing Legislation - Legislation adverse to tax increment financing has been introduced in both houses of the Legislature. Adoption of this legislation would likely restrict the City's ability to create these proposed tax increment financing districts. It would be important to establish these districts prior to April 30, 1990, when the proposed legislation would be effective. Preliminary Plans - Certain portions of the proposed legislation may affect districts that are created prior to April 30. In particular,.it may affect the City's ability to amend existing tax increment financing plans at a later date. Therefore, the proposed retail plans provide for a wide range of public involvement based on the reasoning that it may be difficult to expand the scope of these plans in the future. The adoption of the tax increment financing plans and districts does not commit the City to 'implement the plans. Establishment of the districts would provide the financial basis for future City or HRA participation. Therefore, the plans should be viewed as schematic in nature. Finance Plans — Finance plans will be incorporated into the legal documents presented on April 2. As with the land use plans, a wide range of potential public expenditures is included, e.g. possible public acquisition of properties to facilitate development /redevelopment. These possible- acquisitions include single family homes particularly at 44th and France. The strategy has been to include All possibilities recognizing that legislation may restrict the ability to expand plans in the future. Preliminary public cost budgets have been prepared, but staff has not attempted to determine if adequate tax increments will exist to support such expenditures. In staff's view, such analyses are best performed at the time specific projects are . proposed. Summary - Executive Director Hughes reiterated that staff is anxious to hear the Council's reaction to the concepts in the land use plans, and secondly, some direction as to the amount of public involvement in the districts, particularly as it relates to the potential acquisition of private property for development or redevelopment. All three proposed districts are affected to some degree, at least in the draft stage, by the potential acquisition of property by the City to facilitate development /redevelopment. That is a policy question as to whether the City should be involved in that role or merely should be involved in the traditional public right of way type improvements such as was done at 50th and France. Tax increment financing is"more difficult under the present environment with the very short duration of districts that the City is faced with today, compared with the 50th and France District. Two of the proposed districts, e.g. Valley View/Wooddale and 70th /Cahill have at most an eight year life making it much more difficult to repay public costs. It is hoped that 44th /France can be established as a redevelopment district with a 25 -year life and, therefore, a greater ability to finance public cost. Executive Director Hughes then introduced Fred Hoisington,-Hoisington Group, noting that he was a former Edina City Planner and is very familiar with the three areas that are being studied. (Commissioner /Member Paulus entered the meeting at this point.) Fred Ho isington, consultant, then presented graphics of the three retail areas proposed for tax increment districts. The graphics included the plan area, existing conditions, analysis, redevelopment plan and public improvement plans. Mr. Hoisington presented the draft plans in some detail, which are summarized as. follows: 44th and France Redevelopment Plan - The 44th and France area is a neighborhood scale commercial district. It was developed as "Downtown Morningside" in the 1930's and has maintained its original flavor. The 44th and France Redevelopment. Plan area is generally bounded by 44th Street on the north, France Avenue on the east, 46th Street on the south and Eton Avenue extended on the west. The Plan Area contains a variety of residential and non- residential land uses. There are no vacant parcels within_ the Plan Area. The Plan Area is anchored by the retail uses on France Avenue. Non - residential buildings along West 44th Street and Sunnyside Road are primarily office uses. • The character of the Plan Area is that of. an urban, neighborhood scale retail district. All of the parcels have been developed. Portions of certain developed parcels contain steep slopes and low areas which provide ponding areas and open space. Some properties within the Plan Area receive water from Minneapolis. Electric utilities are above ground throughout the Plan Area. Parking for office and retail uses is provided in private parking lots and public on- street parking. The amount of off- street parking does not comply with current zoning requirements. Convenient parking is lacking for many businesses in.the central part of the.Plan•Area. Most buildings in.the Plan Area were constructed ,tn the 1930's and 1940's. Most ..remain structurally sound but a significant percentage suffer, from structural and life- safety code problems requiring substantial renovation or complete redevelopment-. - - Much of the charm of 44th and France is its eclectic and somewhat haphazard development pattern. However, this has created.some problems. The commercial area is not clearly defined and this has resulted in the conversion of some single family homes to non - residential uses. It has also resulted in disinvestment in single family homes because they are isolated and relate only to non - residential uses. The lack of a clear definition. of the retail center and transitional buffers is a blighting influence. on single family homes nearby. The Edina Cleaners, located at France Avenue and Sunnyside Road, in addition to its original structure occupies what was originally the Westgate Theatre. In Addition to its retail function it operates a large -scale dry cleaning plant. This industrial use is inappropriate in a neighborhood scale retail center. Parcels to the south contain inappropriate and obsolete land uses. Building conditions range from substandard to fairly good. The central portion of the business district is served by a relatively large surface parking area accessed from Sunnyside Road. The shared parking area is owned by a number of property owners. Poor access, grade differentials and no organization of the spaces and drive aisles makes this very inefficient parking. The office uses along 44th Street have an adverse effect on residential properties . on the north side of 44th Street. This has resulted in a lack of maintenance and reinvestment resulting in substandard buildings. The Redevelopment Plan showed redevelopment in the area south of Sunnyside Road with office to the south and 15,000- 20,000 square feet of retail on the corner of Sunnyside /France.. An entry feature on the corner would identify the area as a retail center. The large surfacing parking area would be improved and reorganized. Potential retail development could occur in the Linhoff building area, with possible expansion by Durr, Ltd. Low to medium density multi - family housing could occur on the north side of 44th Street to eliminate the existing conflict. Undergrounding of electric utilities and street landscaping would be included in public improvements to correct problems with public streets /sidewalks. Wooddale and Valley View Road Development Plan - The Wooddale and Valley View Road Plan Area is primarily a neighborhood scale commercial area. The area developed in the late 1950's and early 1960's. There has been some redevelopment in the area but it has maintained its original flavor. Deficiencies in the area are primarily related to serious traffic and parking problems. In addition, there exists at least one significant inappropriate use and some incompatibility between residential and commercial uses. Physical development is now outdated and is gradually deteriorating and is in need of upgrading. The Plan Area in general includes the tracts adjacent to the north side of Valley View Road from the Valley View Center west.of Wooddale Avenue, extending to J 1 , :;f Oaklawn Avenue. The Plan Area is completely developed with urban, neighborhood retail features. All private utilities, except natural gas, are above ground. Parking conditions vary throughout the Plan Area. To the west of Wooddale at the Valley View Center a surplus of parking exists. All uses east of Wooddale have insufficient parking. Cars are often double parked or parked onto the City right of way. Parking lots are privately owned and some sharing does. occur. Circulation within the area is difficult. In many instances there is not separation between sidewalk and street and /or parking and street. Numerous large access /egress points also exist. An analysis of the Plan Area showed general problems as: Broad expanses of pavement; no greenspace Poor signage; no continuity of architecture Too many driveways; to wide and undefined Disorganized parking area Lack of commercial district identify Limited expansion potential. Within the commercial area, activities at the Conoco Station are inappropriate and do not conform to the Zoning Ordinance requirements. Land.use conflicts also exist between the commercial area and the adjacent residential properties to the north, particularly east of Kellogg. The public improvements project would include activities intended to correct non - conforming conditions in the boulevard area and to correct parking and circulation problems in the district. It would provide an identity for the commercial area as well as improving the appearance by providing landscaped boulevards and parking areas. Replacing above ground utilities with underground utilities is also included. The development project would remove the Conoco Station and replace it with off - street parking for the Clinic /Drug Store building and for the Sports Shop /Baskins Robbins building. Kellogg Avenue would no longer connect to Valley View Road to help isolate the residential area from the commercial district. The additional parking would allow the elimination of non - conforming and hazardous parking along the east and south side of the Clinic /Drug Store. These areas as well as others along the perimeter of the development would be landscaped and screened. Wooddale Avenue would be widened with the addition of a.third lane for right and left hand turns. The Development Plan includes an addition.of approximately 6,000 square feet to the southwest end of the existing Valley View Center. The site is under utilized and present parking would accommodate the additional floor space. The .Plan also anticipates remodeling and upgrading of the present center concurrent with the expansion. 70th Street and Cahill Road Development Plan - The 70th Street and Cahill Road Plan Area is a diverse mix of residential, commercial and industrial uses. The area developed primarily between 1950 and 1975. The Plan Area is bounded by 70th Street to the north, the railroad right of way to the east, the northern boundary (from east to west) of the Gabberts building, Village Drive extended and the City of Edina park open space property to the south, and the rear lot lines of the single family homes fronting on Lanham Lane and Lee Valley Circle to the west. y Land use in the Plan Area covers a full spectrum of uses. Five zoning districts are spread across the 17 parcels in the Plan Area which in total comprises approximately 27 acres. The Plan Area is essentially completely developed, however, land to building ratios are relatively high particularly west of Cahill Road. Open space is comprised of woods and steep slopes. There is also a grade separation which divides the commercial land east of Cahill into north and south components. The Plan Area is a part of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. Drainage from the area flows to the south along Cahill Road and east along West 70th Street. All private utilities, except natural gas, are routed above ground. In general, the broad land use categories of the Plan Area are appropriate. As, currently utilized, however, the following land use problems exist: 1) Land Use Relationships - The transition between single family residential uses and higher intensity uses could be improved. 2) Under, Utilized Parcels Parcels in the Plan Area are of adequate size to accommodate reasonable development. However, land to building ratios are high and buildings are located in a manner which prevents. infill development. Specifically, a) the former Edina School building, b). the old St. Patrick Church, and c) , the commercial area between Amundson and Cahill Road. An analysis of the Retail Center identified the following problems: Buildings are disconnected Lacks unified orientation Lacks proper fit with market area General lack of evergreen and shrub plantings Access to shopping center is awkward and unclear Center building is on slope; rear of building faces Cahill Road and is difficult to lease Amundson Avenue no longer needed. Land Use related components of the Development Plan emphasize elimination of uses inconsistent with the Land Use Plan designations and encourage appropriate redevelopment, particularly west of Cahill Road. In addition, redevelopment of functionally obsolete buildings is.-anticipated, particularly in the retail portion of the Plan Area. Reestablishment of an appropriate portion of the Plan Area as a historical feature is also anticipated. Development and redevelopment should be principally accomplished privately with public acquisition for development kept to a minimum. Physical Development components of the Development Plan emphasize.. the upgrading of site and building features to meet contemporary user standards. As to relocation, it is the intent of the H.R.A. that current owners of properties designated for redevelopment be party to .efforts to redevelop their .properties. The Development Plan illustrates a. number of projects in the Plan Area which encompass both public and private property: Public Improvements - This project would eliminate unnecessary streets, improve sidewalks and other public and private utility systems and would designate the historical significance of the Plan Area. Residential Project - This project would encourage development consistent with the land use designations of the Land Use Plan as amended in 1990. The project area is west of Cahill Road and south of 70th Street. Development may include single family residential to the far west of possibly 13. homes and as many as 21 attached dwellings on the east portion. Retail Project - This project is sensitive to immediate service area needs. The project would upgrade and /or create facilities which meet current user demands. A high priority would be to encourage the establishment of businesses to better serve the market area. It is anticipated that the retail project may take one of two possible directions: Alternative A - This alternative would involve the complete development of i 4 the commercial area. It would call for the elimination of the five buildings in the existing commercial area, plus the 7075 Amundson building and the construction of two new buildings totaling 66,000 square feet. A greater number of tenants is also anticipated including potentially upscale convenience. retailers. Public activities may include those in Alternative B as well as the following: Soil correction and preparation Street vacation Land acquisition - Relocation of individuals and businesses - Land writedowns - Low interest loans - Sale of land to private developer. Alternative B -.This alternative would involve the refurbishing of the existing commercial area. Retail floor areas and tenant users will not change significantly. Public activities may include the following: - Interest assistance for rehabilitation Pedestrian /sidewalk improvements Lands cap ing /s tree tscape improvements - Clearance and demolition - Identification and directional signage. Following the conclusion of the presentations by Mr. Hoisington, Mayor Richards called for public comment. Dr. Frank Sidell stated that he has owned the building at 3920 Sunnyside Road for 30 years, in which his practice is: located, together with the parking lot. The Redevelopment Plan for the 44th and France Area would confiscate his parking lot and devalue his property. He said his son has joined his practice and future plans include expansion of the building. The Redevelopment Plan would be a large negative and would seriously jeopardize their building plans. Steve Soltau, 6100 Oaklawn Avenue, said the proposed closing of Kellogg would increase the traffic problems which now exist at the Oaklawn/Valley View triangular intersection. He objected to reorienting the parking for -the clinic /drug store building towards the residential area. As a bus rider, he said he would like to see some parking included for bus riders. 1 James Van Valkenburg stated that he represented the Edina Cleaners & Launderers at 4500 France Avenue South. He said that his clients are concerned that the removal of their existing building will put them out of business. Currently, they have approximately 2,000 customers per week, most of whom use the drop -off area in front of their facility. Also, because they are one of very few commercial Cleaners in the metropolitan area they are concerned that they will lose that business. Sam Thorpe, owner of the Convention Grill property is under lease for 8 more years. believed that taking away the parking for value of the property. He said one of the Convention Grill is that they can usually at 3912 Sunnyside Road, stated that the Not knowing the financial setup, he that property would severely damage the advantages for customers coming to the find a parking place. Bill Schlink stated that he is the owner of the Unocal station at 5415 W. 70th Street. The development plan for the 70th Street and Cahill Road area does not show a service station. He said his station does serve a lot of customers in that neighborhood, is a good location and that there are other ways of accomplishing those projects that would be less costly. He cautioned against rushing into the • project. He said several of his customers who know of the plan are upset with the idea. Dr. Phillip Sidell said he had several concerns -for the 44th and France Redevelopment- Plan. First, he objected to the 4 -6 homes that would be lost and the affect on the remaining adjacent homes. Secondly, once this is passed:it was his impression that the plan is the ideal or goal for the area and that.future plans must fit into this mold. If someone would like to do remodeling or rebuilding that does not fit into the mold they would have a difficult time to get a variance or some other way to achieve that. Bob Roster stated he was a partner with his father in Roster's Conoco on Valley View Road. He said at times the U -haul trucks at their station may be unsightly but it appears that services stations of that type are marked territory. for redevelopment.. He- mentioned that -they are the oldest established U -haul dealership in Minnesota and have been providing this service for.32 years for the Edina community. They have adequate parking for their business but that the real problem was inadequate parking for Baskins Robbins and the bike shop. He mentioned when that corner was developed the last building built was the house. next to the bike shop which lot should have been parking for that retail area. He He felt that house should also be included to provide future parking for that corner rather than acquiring his property. Also, that the houses to the north would not have to be removed if the parking could be addressed for the problem location. Mr.. Roster pointed out that there is another house behind Best Reflections that has easement rights through the parking lot behind Baskins. Robbins. He said that has not been addressed in the plans. Kathy Reckie stated she was the owner of Best Reflections at 4400 Valley View Road. She said they renovated the building about eight years ago and added parking for their customers. She said if the building is taken it would be devastating to lose her business and for those that work for her to lose their jobs. No further public comment being heard, Mayor Richards clarified that at this time no development or redevelopment project is being proposed to be undertaken. What the Council is doing is to make sure that any future Council has all the tools available.to it to do whatever is reasonable, right and necessary to make sure that these areas can accomplish the objectives not only from the public side but what the private sector wants. The Council is not advocating any position as to taking of any businesses, demolishing of parking, etc. What the Council is trying to do is give itself the opportunity to look at all those .issues if and when they might come before the Council. Mayor Richards said the tax increment financing districts are being considered because there is a window -of opportunity that exists today that might not exist in the future, e.g. the use of financing mechanisms for public participation. If the Council decides on April 2 to establish these tax increment districts it does not mean that any of the plans presented would be implemented. That is yet to be decided. This is one step in the process that if not taken may preclude the Council from using one of the alternative tools that might otherwise be available to the public sector in dealing with some of these development and redevelopment issues that may come up in the future. Mayor Richards said this community has not seen a great deal of exercise by the Council in the taking of private property. This is a policy issue that needs to be discussed and debated as to the Council exercising that power if the proper public purpose were found. He concluded by saying that it is important for the public to understand the process and what the Council is trying to accomplish. He said that just because a plan has been proposed he did not want anyone to think. that it was a given that the plan would be implemented. He encouraged the audience to return on April 2 for the public hearing on whether to establish the proposed tax increment districts. Member Smith made a motion setting April 2, 1990, as the.public hearing date on designation of the development district and approval of tax increment financing plans. Motion was seconded by Member Rice. Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. - -Jan Salto, 6100 0aklawn Avenue, said she was concerned because only one plan has been presented for each of the three areas. Mr. Hoisington explained that in talking with a number of the business people involved, they have gone through two or three iterations of the plans to get to this point. There has been a lot of consideration given to alternatives already and that would be an ongoing process. 88/1/90 Executive Director Hughes recalled that on October 2, 1989 the HRA adopted a resolution concerning the acquisition of the Kunz Oil /Lewis Engineering properties for redevelopment purposes. The resolution was valid and effective only until December.31, 1989 and was further conditioned that acquisition could not occur until the HRA had received.a signed and delivered redevelopment agreement for the property. On December 18, 1989 the HRA extended the resolution until March 30, 1990. Director Hughes advised that on March 15, 1990 staff received a proposal for tax increment financing assistance from Jerry's Enterprises and Opus Corporation regarding the subject property. No other proposals have been received to date. Based upon staff's estimate of the time needed to process the proposal for tax increment assistance as well as a rezoning of the property, staff would recommend extension of the resolution until August 1, 1990. Following some discussion on why this has been dragging on with no positive action indicated by Jerry's and Opus, Commissioner Smith moved adoption of the following resoiut%n: RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority that it hereby extends the provisions of the resolution adopted on October 2, 1989 and extended on December 18, 1990 relating to acquisition of certain property within the Grandview redevelopment area to August 1, 1990.. Motion for adoption of the resolution.was seconded by Commissioner Paulus. Rollcall: Ayes: Paulus, Smith, Richards Nays: Rice Resolution adopted. Motion was made by Commissioner Smith and was seconded by Commissioner Paulus for adjournment of the H.R.A. Motion was carried unanimously. HRA Executive Director City Clerk MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALT APRIL 2, 1990 ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith and Mayor Richards. VOLUNTEER RECOGNITION WEEK PROCLAIMED Motion of Member Kelly was seconded by Member Smith for adoption of the following proclamation: PROCLAMATION - VOLUNTEER RECOGNITION WEEK WHEREAS, volunteers have enriched the life of our community through their concern, commitment, and generosity of spirit; and WHEREAS, volunteers are a vital resource to provide for the well -being of our community and its citizens; and WHEREAS, volunteerism embodies a spirit of giving and spirit of growth; and WHEREAS, the City of Edina is proud of the efforts of our volunteers and wishes to thank them for their dedicated service; NOW, THEREFORE, I, Frederick S. Richards, Mayor of Edina, Minnesota, do hereby proclaim the week of April 15 - 21, 1990, as: VOLUNTEER RECOGNITION WEEK ADOPTED this 2nd day of April, 1990. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS ADOPTED Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice to approve and adopt the consent agenda items as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 5 AND JOINT HRA /COUNCIL MEETING OF MARCH 19, 1990 APPROVED Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice to approve the Minutes of the Regular March 5 and Joint HRA /Council Meeting of March 19, 1990. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. PUBLIC HEARING CONDUCTED ON THE DESIGNATION OF DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AND APPROVAL OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLANS ADOPTED Gordon Hughes, Assistant City Manager, advised that notice of this hearing was published and sent to the School Board, to the Board of Commissioners of Hennepin County, and also to property owners in the proposed districts although this is not a requirement. The three areas for consideration are: 1. 44th Street and France Avenue 2. Valley View Road and Wooddale Avenue 3. 70th Street and Cahill Road The development program and tax increment financing plans comprise the legal documents which establish the districts. Plans are required prior to the establishment of T.I.F. Districts and the plans are conceptual and not final. Establishment of T.I.F. Districts is the basis for estimating public costs and tax increment revenues and a framework for deciding the location and the amount of future public expenditures. Mr. Hughes stated that these plans rely ultimately on market place decisions. He noted that these development /redevelopment plans do not constitute rezonings, amendments to the City's Comprehensive Plan, site plans, or an authorization to acquire private property. These are not the only plans, i property owners /developers may propose different plans for these districts and public hearings would have to be held. Fred Hoisington, of the Hoisington Group, a consulting planner who has prepared land use -plans for the site was introduced by Assistant Manager Hughes also introduced was J: Peter Meyers-who-has assisted the City as liaison -with the business community: Mr. Hoisington inquired about how much background should be presented to the audience, with a reminder that a-number of people had:- -not seen the proposal. Mayor Richards told Mr. Hoisington to go through the .plans again to familiarize everyone with what the development -plans propose. Mr. Hoisington .stated.that consultants like to look at the plans for the three areas in a planners view. Problems and needs of these areas are as follows by area: 44th Street and France Avenue.- The plan.presented stressed a - concept more than a physical plan with a change in density of housing on the north side of 44th Street, yet maintaining the character, ownership and architecture of the area. The area closest to 44th has a lack of parking while buildings in back have a surplus of spaces. Steep slopes pose a problem in developing parking in this area. Rehabilitation of the area was mentioned. Mr. Hoisington described a redevelopment of the area south of Sunnyside Road which would include a retail center of 15,000- 20,000 sq.ft, and an office building of 8,000- 10,000 sq. ft. Wooddale Avenue and Valley View - Streets are 61st, Kellogg, and Oaklawn. Landmarks are a large multi - family building, day -care center /office building, shopping center and gas station. Mr. Hoisington pointed out the dangers of the area; risks for pedestrians, parking and circulation of traffic. Some unsightly uses exist, while roads do not meet State Aid standards. The conceptual plan, shows a possible expansion of the shopping center, clinic and drug store, with a refocusing of that location to the east. The conceptual plan also shows some restructuring and reorientation but retention of some business to reflect the Comprehensive Plan which states these types of districts should be contracted to a degree. A need was noted for Kellogg not to continue through to Valley View but a separation between retail and residential could be designed by creating...a hammerhead cul -de -sac. Landscaping, with entry features, the widening of Wooddale from 30' to 32' -36 with turn -lanes would be an attempt to create identity for the area. 70th Street and Cahill Avenue - Streets in the area are West 70th Street, Cahill Road and Amundson Avenue. Landmarks are the old Cahill School, a multi - family housing unit and Cahill Shopping Center. Cahill Center, built in the 1601s, has experienced some leasing difficulties because of the steep grade and dis- jointed buildings. The conceptual plan is if one building could be built, retailers could leverage off of each other. One approach for King's Court would be upgrading and expansion plus, the development of a single center with one building. The plan could would include possible vacation, addition of a cul -de -sac on Amundson with the result being the retention of the industrial and redevelopment of the center. One other idea is to eliminate the central building and link all buildings together. One main problem with this link would be the 7' grade between the buildings. Rehabilitation of these buildings is another possibility via low- interest loans. • Assistant Manager Hughes spoke about the recommended action needed to adopt the Resolution which approves the development plan and the tax increment financing plans for each district. Mayor Richards commented that letters have been received, reproduced and circulated to all of the Council Members. He opened the Public Hearing and asked for comments and concerns from the audience. He stated the reason we are again looking at this is in the belief that the window of opportunity exists to give the City necessary tools to properly plan these commercial areas. - There are no plans being decided upon tonight, only the creating of tax increment districts under consideration, if the Council wishes. Dr. Philip Sidell, 3920 Sunnyside Road; Mary Jo Aiken, 4548 France Av. S.; Jim Van Valkenburg; attorney representing the Edina Cleaner's; Dr. Franklin Sidell, 3920 Sunnyside; Ruth Elwell, 4311 Eton Place; Bill Scholmak, Attorney representing Mr. Gold; Laura Plaetzer, 4058 Sunnyside Road; Walt Sandison, 4612 W. 58th St.; Bob Roster, owner of Roster's Service & Rentals on Valley View Road & Kellogg; Eric Kolsom, 3924 44th St. W; Lois Roen - Brickley, 6120 Kellogg spoke in opposition of the development tax increment financing districts. Steve Soltau, 6100 Oaklawn Av. spoke in favor of the creation of these districts. One member of the audience asked if one vote would be taken for all districts or votes taken individually. Mayor Richards commented that each area would be voted on individually. The question was asked if both sides of France Avenue would be involved. Assistant Manager Hughes answered that Minneapolis has been contacted about their embarking on their own tax increment plan and said he hoped they could later join efforts. Another question was whether the lines on the proposal could be expanded or contracted. Assistant Manager Hughes said it is more difficult to add a parcel to the district rather than delete it. Audience comments and concerns ranged from concern about property being taken, and concern over the nearly completed renovation of some properties, loss of business because of relocation, different levels of parking lots, traffic problems, the necessity of change, the concern for the maintaining of the unique charm and ..architecture -,_ s_afety� _the upgrading_ of _.Valley View_ was a often heard comment, landscaping would be desirable, and less population would be a plus. Mayor Richards asked for questions or concerns from the Council or audience. Member -Kelly asked J. Peter Meyer if he would explain what he has done with this proposal. J. Peter Meyers, stated he has spent 6 weeks representing the City as a liaison . between the planner, involved parties and the City. Upon his recommendation, and with his attendance, one -on -one private meetings were held for those who had concerns or questions. Member. Kelly, asked Mr. Meyers what his assessment was of the meetings held. Mr. Meyers said there had been some lack of understanding, but with property owners input, questions began to arise and answers were attempted. Some property owners now represented directly, received answers from neighbors or via rumors and he felt some of the apprehension is being represented at this meeting. He said his job was to alleviate some of that apprehension by the meetings. He feels the City is not taking advantage of the property owners, but offering a tool that has been Member Rice questioned a troubling comment that was heard regarding whether the free market process is inhibited if these districts are adopted. Assistant Manager Hughes answered that by adopting the plan,. some properties or certain buyers could become undesirable or might chill a sale. On the other side, the presence of a property in a district tends to attract buyers rather than chill the buyers. Member Rice asked in which district was this the case. Mr. Hughes stated that at 50th & France, three homes south of the Peoples Plus station are included in the plan and were shown for multi - family housing, that housing has never occurred, yet sales on those houses have been brisk. Member Rice questioned. about another comment regarding the expansion of a business and if this establishment of this district would be a detriment to this. Manager Hughes answered no, the plan shows an opportunity for expansion, and would add some credence of expanding the business rather than opposing a negative on it. This could vary property by property, retail opportunities could be enhanced rather than be reduced. • properly used by Edina in the past, with this. being the opportunity to do that. Member Kelly asked again whether we are trying to reconstruct a blighted area or that we are meeting a social need for .public good. Mr. Meyers said we are looking to the - future, no one knew what the effect of Southdale would be when it was being developed either. Member Kelly expressed her thanks to Mr. Meyers for his work on this project.. Member Rice mentioned about previously heard comments regarding 44th.and some to .Valley View &.Wooddale.. At the - last - hearing, ,Mr _Rice said -he _- -felt there was less, opposition-at 70th:& Cahill than at 44th and at Valley & Wooddale, and asked Mr. Meyers if.he felt the same. Mr:, Meyers- concurred. Mayor.-Richards answered the question about the necessity of establishing this tax increment financing area, stating we need not do anything, and could let matters resolve themselves which would be an easier course, but he.does not believe this is the right course: The.do- nothing course would deprive property owners of:.an advantage that others have experienced and continue to experience with tax increment financing districts. Mayor Richards mentioned the bashing by legislators of Edina for the mis- handling of tax increment money, and being compared to Minneapolis. He stated that Edina has not and will not go that route. We are fiscally responsible in Edina and will remain so. Mayor Richards predicts some residents will come before the Council at a later date asking for help with public improvements and public monies and Council is proposing they do them all themselves. Again, we could do nothing, and miss the opportunity to create a situation to work with the private sector in trying to improve these areas. In answer to comments, about putting in a lot of money with no pay -back, Mayor Richards explained the City would not spend money unless we can be assured it can be captured in the tax increment financing district. In explanation to another comment heard regarding the ability to use these vehicles for financing of public improvements but not to give a subsidy to the private sector. Mayor Richards said if money is available it could pay for the public improvements, if not, those. public improvements are not done. The statement that we are engaged in deficit spending is not accurate. Another comment heard about taking residential /private properties, philosophically, he would not support any private property being taken. He offered his support in the creation of these districts which would -- -- - - -- - - -- - — - -. -- - -.- - -- - - -.- - - - - -- enable the private sector and - remaining viable areas ab -Ie-to compete with other areas throughout the metropolitan area. Member Rice questioned a troubling comment that was heard regarding whether the free market process is inhibited if these districts are adopted. Assistant Manager Hughes answered that by adopting the plan,. some properties or certain buyers could become undesirable or might chill a sale. On the other side, the presence of a property in a district tends to attract buyers rather than chill the buyers. Member Rice asked in which district was this the case. Mr. Hughes stated that at 50th & France, three homes south of the Peoples Plus station are included in the plan and were shown for multi - family housing, that housing has never occurred, yet sales on those houses have been brisk. Member Rice questioned. about another comment regarding the expansion of a business and if this establishment of this district would be a detriment to this. Manager Hughes answered no, the plan shows an opportunity for expansion, and would add some credence of expanding the business rather than opposing a negative on it. This could vary property by property, retail opportunities could be enhanced rather than be reduced. • Member Smith took exception to the comment that this establishment of a tax increment district idea was dreamed up in response to folks in St. Paul. He explained this issue was discussed last spring and may have forced us to.adopt a schedule, and identify things that we could maintain such as viable retail areas. The intent was not to control what could be or could not be done with buildings in the area. Looking at the plans, we. are shown -the planner's view. Maintaining the vitality of the buildings and homes is - the City's job. He stated he sees. little - wrong .at 44th but would like to facilitate some fix -up of the area-.;, __ "Onerway this can be assured. is to .-capture- increments of tax between a certain date 'and. -a future date. This would not be developed, by :the City, nor would.-homes be purchased,,. this would -be done by a developer with an.interest in your property. Correspondence -has been received regarding the. Valley View. area. Some property owners in that -area have ideas of what they would like to see done.. Member -Smith commented that he does not want things to be razed, but is interested- in.options we have to invest in improving the area. In the 70th & Cahill area-, we.have.seen.,a planners view. The owner of the property has begun doing some improvements, without asking for public money. He said his hope would be that the City would have the money for the property owner when he would be ready to improve the area, street wise, etc.. The charm of these areas must be maintained, but somehow the City needs to be ready when the area needs the.help. In answer to an audience question about trust of the Council to maintain the same posture. Member Smith stated it depends . on the Council that you elect having your same views. He encouraged the audience to attend. Council meetings, write letters to the Council with their views, and to attend planning commission meetings when these issues are being decided upon. Member Jane Paulus stated the job of the City Council is to represent the whole City in long range planning, not only for today but for years in the future. Her perception of what she has heard tonight is mainly.a 'me' point of view and is difficult to address one -on -one. Residential areas in Edina that seem to be appreciating the greatest in home value are. those that have a neighborhood identity. People moving into these areas want a small area they can walk to, and seem to be bringing prime dollars back today into these areas. Member .Paulus said these three areas hit these points very well.. . what were the _. She a._difficult _:__ Member _Peggy_Kelly_asked_ f time with tax increment financing, she believes the private sector should be.the risk- taker in a market - driven economy yet she had a concern a.few years ago about the 44th & France area when Minneapolis was doing improvements on their side of the. Member Kelly commented that she is pleased with improvements she sees happening. She still hears comments about the beautiful way the 50th & France project turned out. During the time of the improvements with 50th & France the economic climate was different and she does not feel 44th & France has the same characteristics. The 70th & Wooddale area has two problems, the gas station and traffic. The Cahill development has been before the Council before, and said she is looking for some.public assistance there to make it happen. Member Kelly said this is a hard decision but feels she must vote against the proposal. Member Rice asked if there was a timeline on these projects. Manager Hughes commented that the duration of the Wooddale.& Valley View district and the 70th & Cahill district would be a maximum of 10 years from the day of its establishment or at most 8 years of increments. 44th & France could last a maximum of 25 years. Member Rice questioned if the vote taken tonight would be to establish these districts. Manager Hughes stated yes. Member Rice asked if at any time in the next few years more planning could be initiated with no effective date. Member ti Hughes commented that there is a four - year, knock -out provision, which means if a parcel is not benefitted by a public project or through tax increment financing within four years of establishment, that parcel drops out of the district. If later, for instance in, the fifth year, it could then come in to the district but just for three more years, until the conclusion of the.district. Member Rice said that he agrees with many comments heard; but does not agree with the taking of property: -He believes the planner working-with the City has responded well but think the plans are too aggressive. He said if he were drawing the lines or putting -in uses,�:he =- would -do them differently. He commented he has heard conflicting comments such.as, save my business, even though it is unsightly, and don't touch-this facility, it generates 2,000 cars per week, and then don't do.anything that will increase traffic. He stated he is in favor of the establishment of these districts, as it gives. the City an option. There are no mandates to do anything at any time, but the opportunity and option to .work with the single family and property owners in these areas. One. interesting comment was made that this would be a catalyst to spur more examination of these areas and establishing cooperation between private and public sector. Some visions for the futures.of.these areas must be seen. Member Rice stated he would vote in favor of these proposals. Member Smith .inquired about when the 50th & France development was done, how were the people and property owners within that tax increment district involved. Mayor Richards stated that in 1970 -72, one of the.strongest groups was the 50th & France, Business Association which still meets on a regular basis. The Vernon Avenue area, has a group that meets on a regular basis with continuous involvement also. Assistant Manager Hughes commented that a steering committee was and still is working as an interface with the City. The committee is typically made up of tenants and landlords and is currently meeting with him on a monthly basis on a prospective project this year. Member Smith questioned the type of input he was hearing from the 50th & France Association,.and what impact they have had. Manager Hughes stated they had participated very closely in the initial project and with the present project are guiding our architect more than staff in terms of the urban design elements that are being pursued. - - — - Member Kelly asked if members of the 50th & France Business Owners Association is comprised of members of the Minneapolis side too. Manager Hughes said yes the Association does have Minneapolis members and that the Edina side is in a tax increment district while the Minneapolis side is not.. The improvements for the Minneapolis side were financed through special assessment as opposed to tax increment financing. Member Kelly asked that perhaps the association does more than work with tax increment issues. Manager Hughes commented yes. Member Rice inquired if property owners would feel like they were in a quandry if these districts were established, and would an orderly timetable be developed. Manager Hughes stated that it varies from district to district. The 44th & France district is similar to 50th & France and recommendation would be to encourage that area to adopt and establish an association that can be worked with - to bounce ideas off of and be a sounding board. Member Rice asked if this timetable was meant to be months or years. Manager Hughes commented months would be needed to get something like that started. 70th & Cahill is a much less cohesive area and one property owner is instrumental with what will happen in that district. Valley View & Wooddale is more in the middle, with two key owners in this district. An association would also be beneficial in this area. Manager Hughes stated that S after creating the districts, it would be the decision of the Council how aggressive or reactive they would like to be in promoting the districts. Mayor Richards commented the issue of aggressive or reactive promoting of the area bears discussing. The City has not been proactive in trying to promote types of improvements. The initiative has come from the _private sector with building expansion, etc. He-referred to the four previous-tax-increment districts that have been instituted, that the - initiative had been taken by -the City. This could.- be done-, but would -fly in the face of the City, ip that if-_the private sector does: not want to do it:- -then: the City shouldn't propose it. The City.is -not creating projects, and if a.deadline is put on it might create an artificial.: - stimulation that may or may not be warranted by -.the area. -that is under discussion. Member Rice .inquired whether it would be the:City's policy,---to- encourage-:these areas to be in constant communication with City.staff, that these plans and uses are not in concrete; but are here to help Mayor Richards:- concurred that we are here to discuss any proposals that the private sector may come up with. Member Kelly asked in establishing these districts., if the-City must have a plan in order to approve a district, how much flexibility can we have with the plan. Attorney Gilligan explained that under the statute there.is.no need for detailed plans or land uses that are set forth in the development program. Goals and objectives need to be stated about the City's intentions, but no details need to be done. ^� Member Smith asked if it is typical in a plan to go into the detail that has been done for these proposed districts. Attorney Gilligan stated that many of these plans come about because there is a development that will occur, so it is known, as opposed to not knowing what is going to happen.: The proposals for the districts allow for much more flexibility and are proposed plans, but do not commit the City to the specific land use. Member Smith said in his understanding of the plan, we do not have "little boxes" of future development. In the plan a line has been drawn around a neighborhood or an area and that identifies the .district. The plan does not spell out this or that happening, but is background information staff has used to determine what the size the district should be. Mayor Richards asked the pleasure of-the Council. Council Member Rice made a motion for the adoption of the following resolution as it relates to the establishment of a`tax increment district for the 44th Street and France Avenue area: RESOLUTION APPROVING THE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 2 AND TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLANS FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS 90 -1, 90 -2 AND 90 -3 MAKING FINDINGS AND REQUESTING CERTIFICATION OF THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS 90 -1, 90 -2, AND 90 -3. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: 1. On April 2, 1990, this Council held a public hearing on the designation of Development District No. 2 (the "Development District ") and the adoption of the Development Program for Development District No.2 (the "Program ") and on the adoption of the Tax Increment Financing Plans for Tax Increment. Financing Districts 90 -1, 90 -2, and 90 -3 (the "Tax Increment Districts "), after notice of public hearing was published in the official newspaper of the City not less than 10 days prior to the date of the hearing. The City has consulted with its planning department on the designation of the Development District. All persons desiring to be heard at the hearing were given an opportunity to express their views. 2. Copies of the Program and the Tax Increment Financing Plans have been presented to this Council and are ordered placed on file with the City Clerk. The forms of the. Program and Tax Increment Financing Plans are hereby approved and are incorporated herein by reference. 3. The Program and Tax Increment Financing Plans and the designation of the Development District and establishment of the Tax Increment Financing Districts are hereby approved. 4. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, subdivision 3, it is hereby found for the reasons set forth in the Program and Tax Increment Financing Plans that: A. Tax Increment Financing Districts 90 -2 and 90 -3 are each in "economic development district" as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subdivision 12. B. Tax Increment Financing District 90 -1 is a "redevelopment district" as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subdivision 10. C. The proposed development outlined in the Program in the opinion of this Council would not occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and therefor the use of tax increment financing is deemed necessary, D. The Tax Increment Financing Plans conform to the general plan for the development of the City as a whole in that it aids in the development of the property in the Development District in a manner that alleviates deficiencies in the Development District as set forth in the Program. E. The Tax Increment Financing Plans will afford maximum opportunity consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole for the development of the area included in the Development District by private enterprise in that it alleviates deficiencies in the Development District as set forth in the Program. F. The City elects the method of tax increment computation set forth in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, subdivision 3, clause (a). 5. The City Manager is authorized and directed to request that the - — -- -- appropriate - officials of Hennepin--County- to establish- the- -Tax Increment -Di-str - cts --- - -- for the premises in the City described in the Tax Increment Financing Plans. Passed by the Council this 2nd day of April, 1990. Mayor Attest: City Clerk The motion was seconded by Council Member Paulus, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Nays: Kelly Motion carried. Council Member Smith made a motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution a it relates to the establishment of a tax increment district for the Yooddale Avenue and Valley View Road area. The motion was seconded by Council Member Rice, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Ayes: Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Nays: Kelly Motion carried. Council Member Smith made a motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution as it relates to establishment of a tax increment district for the 70th Street and Cahill Road area. The motion was seconded by Council Member Rice, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. *FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAIN FOR 7101 -13 AMUNDSON AVENUE CONTINUED TO 4116/90 Motion was made by Member Smith and seconded by Member Rice to continue the final development plan for 71101 -13 Amundson Avenue. George gosmides, generally located at southeast corner of Cahill Rd and Amundson Av until April 16, 1990. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. REQUEST FOR RELEASE OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS DENIED - SOUTH HARRIET PARR STEINER ADDITION Planner Craig Larsen gave background of the Harriet Park Steiner Addition. In March 1986 Council approved a final plat at the intersection of 52nd Street and Minnehaha Boulevard. That plat created two new lots by breaking off the rear portion of two lots that were fronting on Minnehaha Blvd. A condition of that approval was the imposition of private restrictive covenants that would be imposed prior to the release of building permits on the two lots. Those covenants were never signed or recorded, consequently staff has refused to issue building permits for the two lots. Council /Staff received a letter from Mr. Gislason, one of the two parties of the original plat and he requests the Council remove restrictions as a condition of the building permits. The restrictions are structured as a private covenant, seven nearby property owners were given the standing to enforce the provisions of the covenants. The neighbors were notified of the request and the hearing before the Council. Specifically within the Covenants, Section 1, paragraphs A -H set forth design criteria for the houses to _.__ -be- built...._upon__the_ lots- and _.the_._intent_at the_ time of thos_e_provisions_ was_ to______ insure that the design materials and the scale of the new homes would be similar to those existing in the neighborhood. Mr. Robert Gislason, 5205 Minnehaha Blvd., lawyer and 40 year Edina resident, submitted a letter to Council asking that the Special Building Restrictions be removed. He stated that when he was asked to join in making the subdivision, by his neighbors, the only difficulty with this was the lot length with it only being 119' where the code calls for 120'. Lots in the area are generally 60' wide, with the proposed lots being 76' and 78' wide, 25% sq.ft. greater than what is required. This is choice land and should be subdivided and put on the tax roles. Dr. Steiner did appear in 1986 before the Council as he wanted to sell his house and move to Montana. When Dr. Steiner approached Mr. Gislason, with a long list of covenants and restrictions, he did not agree with the covenants and would not sign them. Mr. Gislason believes the covenants to be onerous, and for all practical purposes these lots seem unmarketable with these covenants in place. The nine covenants in question are: A. No more than one family dwelling on each lot B. Houses shall face and front on West 52nd St. C. Houses shall have a 40' rear setback and no house shall be within 40' of the rear boundary of the lot D. Houses shall not exceed 1 1/2 story in height and shall be not more than 25' at the highest point E. Roof pitch shall be 6/12 or greater F. Garages shall be attached, with two stalls; garage floor shall be not more than 2' above the center line of W. 52nd. St. and follow Edina Ordinances G. Materials for exterior shall be brick, shakes, lap siding or a combination of such. The width of exposed shakes and lap siding shall not exceed 12" H. North faces of houses shall be less than 100% glass such that the front walls of the houses shall not be all glass Mr. Gislason passed,out copies of two Supreme Court Landmark Cases, June 1, 1962, No 38,420, T. Joseph Olsen v. City of Minneapolis and May 1, 1959, No. 37,609, State Ex. Re;. Melville Foster and Another v. City of Minneapolis and Another. The Foster case dealt with a municipal corporation that may not condition restricted uses of property upon the consent of private individuals such as the owners of adjoining property. In that case, 2/3 of the adjacent property owners tried to stop something. The Olson case dealt with the building of a filling- station at 58th & Penn. The Court said it seemed obvious that the City's underlying motive in denying plaintiff the permit, was its conclusion that the operation of the filling station would violate the neighborhood concept which it sought to insure. These are choice lots in a nice neighborhood. Mr. Gislason stated he has not tried to market this land, but has been approached by people who had gotten his name from City Hall. He stated he feels these lots should be put in the tax roles the same as all the adjoining land, and feels that the restrictions are unfair and unlawful. Member Paulus asked when these covenants were established in .1986, was the legal opinion that they could stand. Attorney Erickson referred to the minutes attached of February 3, 1986, these lots were sub - standard, because they were not deep enough and needed a variance. Within the variance process, the neighbors were advised of a problem. A meeting was held February 3, 1986, with the neighbors, City staff and Mr. Steiner. At that point it came before Council as an agreed upon instance where the parties_ said fine, these conditions are acceptable, accept-------- and approve the plat with these conditions imposed. At that time no research or opinions were given and no dispute was heard. The initial plat approval was subject to the obtaining of the recorded conditions, and appears by the time of the final plat approval, these had not been signed and plat was approved subject to them not issuing building permits. The same consent was there, it was just deferred, the way the minutes read. There were no opinions given at that time on the validity of the restrictions. Mr. Erickson stated he is familiar with the restrictions cited, restrictive uses may not be conditioned on the consent of adjoining property owners. He referred to the Olson case Mr. Gislason spoke about and agreed that you can not deny a requested activity within the ordinance that is solely based upon the objections of neighbors. This case was not based on neighborhood approval nor based on ascetics, it was a consent arrangement that came before the Council. Member Paulus asked if her understanding is that this arrangement as originally drawn up, could stand in a court of law. Mr. Erickson said there may well be some problems with the restrictions as framed. The legal issue did not come from the Council, there was no dispute at the time. He believes what happened was that the Council imposed these restrictions, based upon a statement that everything was fine. Whether the Council would have acted and approved the plat, had there been a dispute was another point. The plat was approved based upon statement that these conditions would be imposed. Member Paulus questioned whether the plat would become null and void if these conditions were not met. Mr. Erickson stated this would be an argument if these conditions were withdrawn, and the approval was given on the presumption that these conditions were going. to be there, therefore the plat should. not have been approved and it may be- .revoked... Member.'Paulus asked whether :;the City Ordinance . - presently states that no future. single. family homes in. Edina; can be.built with- only a single: car :garage =and couldn't be grandfathered in for a one garage. Planner Larsen stated there must :.be -a two -car garage., - Member: Paulus- inquired, if a person building a home meets all ordinances, would these, plans. be reviewed by. the Planning Department. Planner Larsen stated that the restr ictions that are before the Council are a private matter and the City ,is not party.- to. .;If there. .was a disagreement -, the seven - :panties would have to enforce the covenants. Member Paulus asked if at 'the time this was discussed back in 1986,,.were all parties part of the discussion at that-.time. Planner Larsen said.2 parties proposed the plat. and all dealings were with.Dr. Steiner with no staff contact with the Gislason s. The City was led to believe that there was an agreement on the proposal. Member Paulus asked whether Mr. Gislason was aware of or present at discussions going on about this. Mr. Gislason stated.he was not present, and had no information that discussions were taking place. His first knowledge of a problem was when he was asked to sign a document concerning these restrictions and he refused to do so. Member Paulus inquired about when this happened. He said 2 -3 years ago Member Paulus asked if he had spoken to Mr. Larsen at that time and asked if he had had a problem with the original agreement that was drafted. Mr. Gislason stated he explained his position to Dr. Steiner and left it up to him and said again that he would not sign it. This has come up now because there is a purchaser that is interested in one of the lots. Mancel Mitchell, .5137 Juanita, spoke for himself and a neighbor Maria Beal, 5136 Indianola; Rita Lehnert, speaking for her mother, Mary, 5209 Minnehaha Boulevard; Carolyn Wenger, 5212 Halifax; spoke in opposition to the lifting of the restrictive covenants. Doug Grabham, 5201.Minnehaha offered an apology for bringing up the matter to _ bin- with. He had a vested as he pays the taxes on the empty lots Comments heard from the aforementioned residents ranged from the belief being that anyone interested in building in the area would keep to the spirit and flavor of the neighborhood and could easily build within these covenants, residents were in the belief that the City was a party to the process of the drawing up of the covenants, if the Council chooses to lift these covenants the suggestion was heard that the whole plat process should be reexamined, Mayor Richards asked for concerns or questions from the Council. Member Paulus commented that if these covenant's are removed, it should go back for variance review. The intent was that the subdivision was granted with the covenant's riding with it. She asked for clarification from the the planning department regarding her interpretation of this so that the proponents are aware that it will go back through the process. Member Jack Rice asked for clarification on the process. Could anyone buy these . lots, come in and build on them without a plat being filed. Attorney Erickson said he has not read the statute lately but believes that a court order would -have to be acquired to cancel the plat that has already been filed. Member Peggy Kelly asked what it would take to get a court order and would be very expensive. Attorney Erickson stated it all depends upon how hard Mr.. Gislason fights, it could be expensive but depends upon how difficult a task it is on the defense side. There would have to be some arguments on misrepresentation that -led the City to do:wha - ' h' did and after these were proven to be :such, the opportunity should be revoked. Member -Kelly said in.her understanding .that if these covenant's are lifted; =this is "the - process that would have-to be done., Attorney Erickson said no, it is a choice. Member Rice said if these covenants are rescinded, then we are dependent upon - someone else doing something to get control back over the process. Mayor- Richards recalled the action was an approval of a certain action predicated upon certain events occurring. If one action is removed, the burden is upon the Council.. The staff was instructed not to issue a building permit until those covenant's were filed. If the covenant's are removed, the position seems that the staff is free to issue the building permit. If we.do not agree with that point of view then the action we have taken stands. If.Council agrees the action taken stands. Member Jane Paulus commented that if you want to see how ridiculous the covenants are, speak to the people who live in the Country Club area. Someone can purchase a lot, say these are the plans that they are going to build on the lot, but are not legally tied in to those plans, once the lot is purchased. There is no safeguard because Planner Larsen has seen the plans to say to the neighborhood they have a guarantee that the house will fit in when it goes up.. Member Kelly inquired about her understanding that these covenant's were between the people involved and the process. Mayor Richards commented that we had a difference of opinion regarding whether a variance should be granted. Before we got down to the merits of granting or not granting a variance, a consensus. was presented to the Council by the then affected __property_ owners, putting these 8 restrictions on the property. There was no _ objection to the property being platted or replatted. Member Rice asked if on that basis the Council assumed this was the case. Mayor Richards said he does not know how he would have thought on the variance but knew when everyone was in agreement, and differs some with Mr. Gislason's viewpoint. Mayor Richards does not consider this onerous enough to diminish the market value of the property. Character and symmetry of the neighborhood is always examined to see if development is consistent with regulations. Mayor Richards said the way he sees this situation is to assure that what is being proposed, is what the end result would be. He stated that is the way he voted in 1986, and plans to vote as such this evening. Member Paulus asked Mayor Richards if he had any problem with legal issues on this issue standing. Mayor Richards said he does not use the word legally, but knows where he stands in voting with what is right or wrong. Member Paulus again said that she has no problem with this, but hears that if it stands, feels that the City will be legally challenged... -Mayor Richards stated he would not change his mind because of a possible suit against the City. Member Rice thinks he is hearing that everyone wants to maintain character and symmetry, maintain the neighborhood, etc., if this stands and someone who wishes to build on this property, and must follow the covenants, is the City in a position to allow this to happen or not. Attorney Erickson said no. At the time it was set -up, it was established that surrounding neighbors were the enforcing entities. If they comply with their building code, they are entitled to a building permit, but if they don't comply with these, the neighbors could say they did not comply with them and must. Member Rice stated that it would be up to the neighbors to take the action to stop-or go ahead with building. Mayor Richards stated there are a number of choices but the three that surface are: 1. Affirm the action taken by a previous Council saying that no building permit should be issued until these restrictions are placed at record. Which in effect carries forwbLrd those conditions seen as set forth. 2. Accept the current proponents request to remove and release those restrictions altogether. If that is the decision of the Council, then suggest that the related issue be addressed whether or not the City should take action to unwind the approval of the replat and the filing of that replat to go back and address the fact of variance being necessary to develop the lots that have been created out of the replat. Or take the action that this does not need to be done, the replat would be filed. In effect the City's staff should issue a building permit upon compliance with all building requirements for detached single family residence rezoning. 3. Do not deal with it, refer it back to the Planning Commission or for continuance if additional information is needed. Member Smith stated that the proponent could go back and negotiate with the property owners that are affected by this agreement that goes with the land by virtue of the platting, and try to get modifications that are deemed necessary and bring that revision back to Council and then go forth and enforce their restriction. If he neighbors wanted to modify this plan they may. Mr. Smith stated he is thinks things should be as they are, and that Mr. Gislason should try to work with the neighbors, if they at that time want to revise it they may. Mr. Smith _said he would vote to let it stand. Member Smith made a motion to deny the request to remove the restrictive covenants from the South Harriet Park Steiner Addition and a second to the motion was given by Member Paulus. Member Rice stated he would support the motion, however if Mr. Gislason came back in the future and said he was able to negotiate all but one item on the list, and no one is responsive to that, he might have a different attitude about it. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. Mayor Richards commented that the action taken in March, 1986 stands. * LOT DIVISIONS APPROVED AT 7021 vE%FORD RD AND 7028 AND 7100 DOWN ROAD AND LOT DIVISIONS AT 6124 AND 6128 EWING AV SO APPROVED Notion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice for adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the following described tracts of land constitute various separate parcels: PJ Lot 12, PROSPECT HILLS, and Lot 2, Block 1, GRIFFITH ADDITION, and Lot 1, Block 1, SCHEY'S PARR VIEW 2ND ADDITION WHEREAS, the owners of the above tracts of land desire to subdivide said tracts'. into the following described new and separate parcels (herein called "Parcels "): - Lot 12, PROSPECT HILLS, except that part of Lot 12, PROSPECT-HILLS lying southeasterly of -a line running from a point in the -easterly'lini -of Wexford Road distant 67.26 feet - southerly measured along said easterly-line, from the southwesterly- corner of Lot 13 said PROSPECT HILLS, to .a point in the northeasterly line of said`Lot- 13,- distant 50.00 feet'- northwesterly, measured along said northeasterly line,-from the southeasterly corner of said Lot 13 and lying westerly of a line drawn from a point on the above described line distant .97.08 feet northeasterly along said line from-the easterlyl` line of Wexford Road to a point on the south line of said Lot 12 distant 139.81 feet easterly along said south.line from the most westerly corner of said Lot 12. Subject to easements of record, if any; and Lot 2, Block 1, GRIFFITH ADDITION, and that part of Lot 12, PROSPECT HILLS lying southeasterly of a line running from a point in the easterly line of Wexford Road distant 67.26 feet southerly measured along said easterly line, from the southwesterly corner of Lot 13 said PROSPECT HILLS, to a point in the northeasterly line of said Lot 139 distant 50.00 feet northwesterly, measured along said northeasterly line,.from the southeasterly corner of said Lot 13 and lying westerly of a line drawn from a point on the above describe line distant 97.08 -feet northeasterly along said line from the easterly line of Wexford Road to a point on the south line of said Lot 12 distant 139.81 feet easterly along said south line from the most westerly corner of said Lot 12. Except the east 54.03 feet as measured at right angles to the east line thereof. Subject to easements of record, if any; and Lot 1, Block 1, SCHEY'S PARR VIED 2ND ADDITION, and the east.54.03 feet, as measured at right angles to the east line, of the following described property: That part of Lot 12, PROSPECT HILLS lying southeasterly of a line running from a point in the easterly line of Wexford Road distant 67.26 feet southerly, measured along said easterly line, from the southwesterly corner of Lot 13 said PROSPECT HILLS, to a point in the northeasterly line of said Lot 13, distant 50.00 feet northwesterly, measured along said northeasterly line, from the southeasterly corner of said Lot 13 and lying westerly of a line drawn from a point on the above described line distant 97.08 feet northeasterly along said line from the easterly line of.Wexford Road to a point on the south line of said Lot 12 distant 139.81 feet easterly along said south line from the most westerly corner of said Lot 12. Subject to easements of record, if any. WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinances Nos. 804 and 825; - NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is hereby-approved and the- requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 804 and Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances. ADOPTED this 2nd day of April, 1990. RESOLUTION vHERM, the following described -tracts of land constitute various separate parcels: Lot 3, Block 1, ENGLEHARDT'S ADDITION, and Lot 1, Block 1, FARHER'S SECOND ADDITION SEAS, the owners of the above tracts of land desire to subdivide said tracts into the following described new and separate parcels (herein called "Parcels "): Lot 3, Block 1, ENGLEHARDT'S ADDITION, except the south 5 feet, and Lot 1, Block 1, FARMER'S SECOND ADDITION, and the south 5 feet of Lot 3, Block 1, ENGLEHARDT'S ADDITION; and vHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will. create an unnecessary hardship and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purposes of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Ordinances Nos. 804 and 825; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Ordinance No. 804 and Ordinance No. 825 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances. ADOPTED this 2nd day of April, '1990. DECISION OF BOARD OF APPEALS OVERTURNED* SIDEYARD SETBACK VARIANCE GRANTED - 4420 VANDERVORK AV Associate Planner Phil Dommer gave background on the appeal of the decision by the Edina Board of Appeals to deny a 1.5 foot sideyard setback variance in case B -90 -9. The Board met March 15, 1990, to review the subject variance. At issue is a sideyard setback which is a typical situation which we have in the City, where as the building gets taller, the sideyard setback requirement is increased by 1 1/2' on both sides of the house. The Board of Appeals heard this request, reviewed testimony from the proponent and decided to deny the request. The proponent is here tonight with her designer if there are any questions. Mayor Richards called for questions from the audience. Mayor Richards asked the proponent to speak. Star Marie Anderson - Atwater, a 10 year resident at 4420 Vandervork Av., stated that in March, Mr. Dommer told her that a home in her neighborhood had a variance when it was built and her home will resemble this home when her addition is completed. Ms. Anderson - Atwater added there are 7 houses on her block, 4 two -story and 3 one - story. She said her neighbors have no objection to the plans, after examining them. One neighbor adjoining has one window on the side facing the Anderson - Atwater home and the neighbor on the other side has only one win being a bathroom window. She said she has two children and needs room and it would be more expensive to put the addition in 1 1/2' ft. Mayor Richards opened.up the meeting for comments on why this variance should not be granted. Member -Kelly asked if any neighbors were in the audience.:that would speak to-this issue. She-noted-she has - driven- around the area . a:- lot today -and-commented that this is -a unique ::area in that the back yard is a.wetland,.across :the street=is - =a park - -and it- is, east- - west- facing so no blocking light out- with 2 -story houses next toi the one story--houses-. -She said she wished she could hear the neighbors state they have no objection to this addition, but after her' examining._ of the area she stated she could allow this variance to.be granted: Member Paulus asked'of Mr. Dommer whether we got-any comments at the time the original variance was heard. Associate Planner Dommer commented that there were no comments heard, either at the hearing or by letter. Member Smith asked Mr. Dommer if these neighbors have ever signed off. Mr. Dommer said no, that it is not required that neighbors sign; _their opportunity to make. their feelings heard is at.the hearing, and.they received a notice about that. Member Smith - inquired if there is a way of indicating agreement with the proponents statement that the neighbors do not object. Mr. Dommer stated he did not know this for sure. Ms. Anderson- Atwater commented that one neighbor's son who does painting and wallpapering and wants to do the work. Member Smith wanted more evidence that the neighbors were all right with this addition. Mayor Richards stated that all the City can do is send notices and give people the opportunity to participate. Member Smith stated the Council does not know what the residents think and expressed concern. Mayor Richards called for the pleasure of the Council. Member Kelly made the motion to allow the variance to be granted and the decision of the Board of Appeals for the sideyard setback at 4420 Vandervork Av be overturned and a second to the motion was made by Member Smith. Member Paulus wished the minutes to read that no neighbors were present at the variance meeting and at the public hearing April 2, 1990, nor was there any public comment noted. Member Kelly said if that was to be included that it should be noted that at the Board. of Appeals meeting the vote was a 2 to 2 vote which failed because the lack of majority. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. fh *HEAR naG DATE OF 4116190 SET FOR PLANNING MATTERS Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice to set April 16, 1990, as hearing date for the following Planning matters: 1) Final Rezoning - R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to PRD -2, Ron Clark Construction 2) -Final Plat Approval - Highcrof t -Addition, Ron Clark Construction 3) Preliminary Rezoning Approval - PCD -4 Planned Commercial District to PCD -2 Planned Commercial District - palgreen's by Semper Holdings - 4916 France Avenue South 4) Preliminary Plat Approval of R -2 Double Dwelling Unit District to PRD -2, Planned Residential District - Schaefer Development 5) Final Development Plan - Opus Corporation - Western National Mutual Insurance - 5350 W. 78th St., 5309 Industrial Boulevard - Building Expansion 6) Final Development Plan for 6969 France Av. S. - Gabbert and Beck Building Expansion Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE RELATING TO ON -SALE NINE LICENSE AMENDMENT GRANTED City Manager Rosland gave background information about the wine Ordinance 902 -A1. Council adopted the wine licensing ordinance on April 1, 1985, which allowed sales of wine only in qualifying restaurants. Sec. 43 of the ordinance provided for automatic termination of all previously issued licenses and also stated that no licenses shall be issued after July 1, 1990. There are 3 options: 1. Extend the sunset provision to a future date. 2. Repeal the sunset provision as-stated in Sec. 43. 3. Take no action and hold a public hearing Staff has no objections to wine licensing, it has gone well as a general rule, with getting paperwork done the only problem and not with wine as a public nuisance problem. Member Kelly made the motion to eliminate the sunset provision on Ordinance No. 902 -A1. A second to the motion was made by Member Smith. Member Smith asked of Attorney Erickson what the effect would be with the elimination of the sunset provision. Attorney Erickson stated that at any time the ordinance could be amended, delete or cancel or do' whatever is wished. Member Smith asked if this would condemn anyone's right to sell wine. Attorney Erickson stated that liquor licenses were not considered a property right so are not subject to claims for taking them away. Mayor Richards opened up the meeting for questions. Member Smith asked if this was the appropriate time to strengthen things or fine people if they don't acquire training. Mayor Richards this is perhaps an appropriate _ comment. but a more appropriate_ time to this would_ be when the general ordinance is being dealt with. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Smith, Richards Motion carried. CONCERN OF RESIDENT REGARDING WALNUT RIDGE PARK CONTINUED TO 4/16190 Manager Rosland suggested that the Walnut Ridge Park discussion be continued to April 16, 1990, because the concerned resident is away on vacation. DISCUSSION HELD ON PRIVATE PARKING LOTS AT FAZRVIEO SOUTHDAI.E HOSPITAL AND SOUTHDALE MEDICAL CLINIC At the March 5, 1990, meeting, staff had presented information on existing Edina ordinances that would apply to regulation of private parking lots. Following that discussion, it was a consensus of the Council that staff bring back further information for discussion regarding additional action the City could consider. Planner Larsen has provided the following information in his memo of April 2, 1990. The City of Minneapolis requires a license for all parking lots containing 10 or more parking spaces. All parking lots are subject to design standards and are reviewed by the Department of Public Works. Commercial parking lots, those charging for parking, are subject.to further requirements, including signage and stacking spaces. All parking lot licenses are granted by the Minneapolis City Council. Key elements of the ordinance relating to Commercial Lots are: EDINA ORDINANCE MINNEAPOLIS ORDINANCE Edina requires no license 1. Licenses required for all parking lots containing 10 or more spaces - Free Parking: License for initial application only - Commercial lots:- Yearly license required, Fee between $100 -$300 2. Performance Requirements: All Parking Lots: A. Yes A. Hard surface required B. Yes B. Setbacks required C. Yes C. Landscaping & screening required D. Yes D. Design and layout subject to approval of City Engineer No Ordinance Requirement 3. Stacking spaces at entrance (Note: Stacking spaces were required 1 space for self -serve ticket vendor for review by City Engineer and 3 or 4 for attended lots No Requirements No Ongoing or Periodic inspections required. 4. Sign Requirements A. Name & phone # of licensee B. Hours of operation C. Rates, including minimum rate and maximum rate for 12 and 24 hours. D. Size of signs defined in Ordinance 5. Inspections. Authorized as deemed necessary by Department of Licenses. Manager Rosland stated that staff had met with the Cambridge Group to make it safe parking. The stance took by the staff is that Cambridge in theory has the right to do what they want with their property. The responsibility of the City is to protect public safety. Staf:E► s met with them on a number of occasions, the ity engineers have reviewed it, Hennepin County because of 66th Street has reviewed it also. The engineering and fire staff has been monitoring the lot, with regard to stacking on the public streets and emergency vehicles. Manager Rosland noted he had personally visited the lot which was approximately 50 -60% full. He exited on 66th Street but noted about 35 cars parked in the Southdale area, obviously were parked there for Southdale Medical which is a safety concern. Mayor Richards opened up the discussion to the public. The following spoke in opposition to paid parking that the owners of the Southdale Medical Building have implemented: Sarah Foss, resident of Richfield; Gordon Hendrickson, 5708 Upton Av. S.; Paul Belvedeere, DDS tenant of Southdale Medical Building; Doneta Hoffman, 5825 St. John's Av., Leanne Tillman, 8370 Red Rock Road, Eden Prairie; Roberta Thorp, resident of Edina; Dr. William Wright, 6621 Sally Dr., retired pediatrician; DouL Lambert, DDS, 6205 Hansen Road; Paul Mullin, owner of Foto -Lab in Southdale Medical Building; Gary Bolmgren, resident of Richfield; and Glenn Hendrickson. t Objections and concerns voiced included: paying for parking at both the hospital and medical building, access for emergency vehicles, concern for non- ambulatory patients, building safety, lack of communication between building, owners and tenants, permanent completion of the lot, no means of dropping- off /picking -up of people, fear of patient and /or doctor egress...- Safety for patients choosing to park in the Southdale Center lot and crossing- 66th Street to-the Medical Building was expressed-by several- persons as well as-- safety of pedestriains entering the. building from the lot. Mayor Richards asked what has'been done about access to -the- building for - emergency vehicles in the public - right -of- way. -- Manager Rosland explained that the area had been examined by the Police and Fire Departments,- .i ".e., curbs- urbs; ;etc. as to adequate access. Two -areas previously mentioned as temporary drive -ovens are exactly that, and will be changed when.weather allows construction. One lady has been hit on the Southdale Center perimeter road coming from the medical building. As .the parking lot is now, no one can be dropped off.at the front door, however if you drive in and stay less than .15 minutes there is no charge. Planner Larsen then summarized the differences between Edina's ordinance requirements and the Minneapolis Ordinance. Licensing requirements do not preclude someone from choosing to charge for parking, no communities were found that prohibit charging. Mayor Richards asked the City Attorney, if there would be legal impositions for Edina if the City were to adopt an ordinance to preclude someone from charging for parking on private property. Attorney Erickson stated that City Ordinances must be related to the health, safety and welfare of the community. This charge or no- charge would have to be tied to the existence of a health or safety factor. If charging begins and it becomes more of.a safety risk, there.may be some reason to impose an ordinance restriction. Some nexus would have to be found between the ordinance and the activity.being governed. Member Paulus asked, if the City were to establish an ordinance regulating parking lots after the fact, could we require those standards then to be met. Attorney Erickson commented that Edina has fought that issue with building codes, where a new building code is adopted, and existing buildings must.comply. This has been __— won -on - _a- heal- th-safe-ty_. issue- ,__i....e_ sprinkler__in_a._b.asement _ s_o_._f.ir_efighter s__don't___ -.____ get caught in smoky areas. This could possibly be done if it. is a health- safety feature, otherwise it could be a non - conforming use grandfathered in. Member Smith whether crossing of 66th Street by pedestrians could be characterized as a life- saving issue. Attorney Erickson stated no, rather the actual use of the lot, by virtue of charging, may make it a safety factor. Member Smith asked whether the City can regulate a drop -off access. Attorney Erickson said yes, if it were in the public street where it might back up traffic and result in people getting hurt. This may well have the connection between regulation and the health- safety feature it entails. Member Smith asked if.it is necessary in every building to have a public -free access to an automobile without. charge. Attorney. Erickson said, no, not without charge but all Edina's code requires all buildings to have access to public streets. Member Paulus asked if that could be an ordinance requirement. Attorney Erickson said again only if it has a health - safety factor to it. Just because the lot does not have free access it does not necessarily indicate a safety feature. It could be stated that people could not be dropped off in the public streets, or areas that otherwise would be. posted for no- parking or no- stopping. If there was parking on the street, it would be difficult to stop and unload someone. If it were a non -stop, non -park area, it could be said you cannot unload people in those types of zones,.and it could be posted as such. Member Paulus commented that this is private property and that the issue as to charging is their decision. She again stated her concern over the stacking of cars in the lot, _the crossovers and the traffic flow. This is one of biggest health- -safety hazards that needs correcting. Signage should state that people using the lot for parking must have cash upon exiting. Member Smith stated he --recently doctored at: another facility with a family member . that had paid parking and did not like it. However it was a part of the facility, and was out of his control. There is no regulation that.states you- cannot charge . for parking-. He felt.there could be better access for emergency vehicles. Also that the building owners should have been given.the tenants more notice on the paid parking. If the concern is safety, this is an item that can be addressed by the Council, but an ordinance cannot be designed saying someone cannot charge for parking. Member Kelly asked whether this would.be brought back as a draft ordinance, or whether this would be open for discussion again. She stressed the importance of the safety issue, the need for a charge for licensing, and,said a lot of employee time had been spent on this issue and the City should be reimbursed. Member Rice suggested that an ordinance be pursued. Cambridge came into Edina, acted fast and the City had no ordinance permitting or not allowing paid parking or licensing to happen. He stated if we were starting with a vacant lot, there would certainly have been more than 24 hours to consider its approval. He mentioned other paid parking facilities in the area; however they all have a pick -up /drop -off access. Member Rice said he felt the situation will improve. The marketplace will tell Cambridge if their decision was good or bad. The tenants are upset and have communicated that to the owner. If many leave the building, the owners will rethink their position.on paid parking. Safety is the major concern, but staff feels it is a safe access .even though it looks awkward. There is a feeling that not everything needs to be regulated but if, there are going to be commercial parking lots in the City, there must be some control over them, i.e, a process and reimbursement for the process. Mayor Richards in summation said that safety seems to be the biggest concern, and along with that, regulations about how we would license and inspect, and how we would see parking lots function. Whether to charge or not to charge should not be the issue focused on. Access questions have been raised, emergency and health- safety issues also have been discussed. Mayor Richards asked that staff draft an ordinance that would address the issues raised to be brought to Council on May 7, 1990, to which the Council concurred. He also suggested that Cambridge be notified of the meeting. Member Smith suggested that Cambridge be notified of the concern for clear access to the front door for drop- off /pick -up. Dr. Belvedeere asked if he could submit a video tape that he has made of the parking lot entrances which might help to make a decision. Mayor Richards said that any information which might help in the decision - making process, should be submitted to the City staff. BID AWARDED FOR TOW TRUCK WITH RECOVERY UNIT Public Works Director Francis Hoffman explained this request was continued from March 5, 1990, meeting. He i r L`. noted the attachments in the packet and that the funds come from Central Services which means other departments benefit from this purchase also. Questions brought up about this truck were how often it was used, for just towing and not servicing or what. He explained that towing costs the City approximately $3,000- $4,000 annually. This includes Public Works, and the Police and Fire Departments. During a really cold winter this could be up to $2,000 more per year. Director Hoffman commented that this appears to be an expensive vehicle, -but over 15 years it appears this -would pay for itself. Member Kelly said this is a budgeted-item. Member Kelly made a motion to award the bid to purchase the Challenger Model 5601 tow truck from Twin City's Wrecker Sales in the amount of $69,940.00. A second to the motion was given by Member Rice. Member Paulus stated this is an awesome amount of money to pay for one tow truck, is still grateful that she questioned the cost. Director Hoffman commented that this is not even the cream of the crop vehicle and is very standard. The Public Works Department did not request specifications for a super rig. Member Smith asked if there was a possibility of sharing this with another suburb. Director Hoffman said the service could be offered and they could use it. The Police and Fire have mutual aid, and the possibility could be looked into it. He told that Bloomington has two huge super trucks, completely out of Edina's league. Member Rice stated that 3 or 4 staff people said that we need this truck, and he concurs with them. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Paulus, Rice, Richards Nays: Smith Motion carried. *BID AWARDED FOR SAND ROCK, BITQMINOUS MATERIAL, CONCRETE Notion made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bids to recommended low bidders as follows: Sand (delivered) to Prior Lake Aggregate at $3.03 per ton; Buckshot (delivered) to Model Stone at $8.35 per ton; Limestone Class II (delivered) to Edward Kraemer & Sons for $5.30 per ton; Seal Coat Chips (delivered) to Dresser Trap Rock for $13.25 per ton; Plant Asphalt #2331 (picked up) to Commercial Asphalt for $16.20 per ton; Asphalt 2331 Fine �icke� -up) to Midwest Asphalt at $19.10 per ton; Asphalt #2341 (picked -up) to Midwest Asphalt at $19.20 per ton; Asphalt Winter Mix (picked -up) to Midwest Asphalt for $39.00 per ton; Concrete (delivered) to Model Stone for $44.00 cu.yd.; Cut Back Asphalt (delivered) to Koch Refining at .708 per gallon. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR ONE REVERSIBLE SNOW PLOW AND WING Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for one reversible snow plow and wing to recommended low bidder, LaHaas Manufacturing & Sales, at $10,558.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR ONE 1990 FORD F -800 LIFT TRUCK WITH AN AERIAL BUCKET Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for one 1990 Ford F -800 lift truck with an aerial bucket to recommended low bidder, Road Machinery & Supply for $67,108.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR PARKING LOT RECONSTRUCTION AT BRAEKAR GOLF COURSE Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for parking lot reconstruction at the Braemar Golf Course to recommended low bidder Alber Construction for $168,951.20. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR BRAEKAR SOCCER FIELD RENOVATION Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice for award of bid for the renovation of the Braemar Soccer Field to recommended low bidder, Perkins Landscape for $9,789.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote, five ayes. I -494 EIS UPDATE GIVEN Engineer Francis Hoffman gave an update of what has been done so far. Information and evaluating is being done on alternatives for I -494. The first area of review is immediately south of Edina between TH 100 and old County Road 18. City staff is working the Mn /DOT, Hennepin County, consultant and other cities staff to develop and reduce the number of alternatives in each area that should be studied in detail. Mayor Richards extended thanks to Director Hoffman and Member Paulus for monitoring this process. The Mayor asked Director Hoffman to report back to Council again with periodic updates. No action required. VACANCY NOTED ON RECYCLING COMIIISSION Mayor Richards noted that a vacancy exists on the Recycling Commission as Ken Joyce is unable to accept appointment that was done March 5, 1990, to fill the partial term to 2/1/91. The Mayor explained he has one name submitted to him, and if the Council has names of interested people to submit those to him.' His intention is to appoint someone to fill this vacancy by the April 16, 1990, meeting. In addition, it was noted by the Mayor that there is also a vacancy on the Board of Appeals. REPORT GIVEN ON DOG LICENSING PROCESS - CONTINUED TO APRIL 16 1990 REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING Mayor Richards commented the information requested at a previous Council meeting had been received from Chief Craig Swanson regarding the Edina process on dog licensing. The Mayor opened up discussion on the process. By consensus of the Members, this ,item will be on the April 16, 1990, agenda. - -- -- -PROPOSED- 1990 -- --PROJECTED- STORM- -WATER IMPROV KENNTS- AUTHORIZATION -TO- BID- CONTIPUED -TO APRIL 16 1990. REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING Director Hoffman gave background on proposed stormwater projects to be constructed during 1990 to be funded from the stormwater utility as follows: Section I: W. 76th St. & Parklawn, Edina Lake Park $ 9,040.00 Section II: Edina Manor- Grimes & Halifax Avenues South of W. 58th St. 56,492.00 Section IIA: Edina Manor - Grimes & Halifax Avenues from MH CB #4 to MH #5 17,902.00 Section III: Sunnyside Av. & Browndale Av. to Creek 97,885.50 Section IV: W. 64th St between Xerxes and Pond 37,795.00 Section V. Yorktown Park Strip from Adams Hill Pond 105.016.00 TOTAL $324,130.50 Director Hoffman said some neighbors in the Halifax /Grimes area are under the belief that those projects will cause problems for them. Mayor Richards said those projects would be open for discussion on April 16, 1990, when bids are awarded. Member Kelly asked whether the Grimes /Halifax area was the area with flooding problems during the 1987 storm. Director Hoffman said no, the area that had the bad flooding was just north of 58th & Woodcrest. Member Bice moved to authorise bids for the projects as presented with the exception of Sections II and Ilk and moved adoption of the following Resolution: RESOLUTION APPROVING'PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND DIRECTING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS SOS. ,STS-199, STS -200, STS 201, STS -202 A SfiS -203 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA: 1. The plans and specifications for the proposed improvements set forth in the following Advertisement for Bids form, heretofore prepared by the City Engineer, and now on file in the office of the City Clerk are hereby approved. 2. The Clerk shall, cause to be published in the Edina Sun and Construction Bulletin the following notice of bids for improvements: (Official Publication) CITY OF EDINA 4801 W. 50th Street EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS STORM SEfiEB CONTRACT 90 -6 (ENG) is IMPROVEMENT NOS STS -199. STS -200. STS -201 STS -202 & STS -203 BIDS CLOSE APRIL 12, 1990 Bids will be received and opened in the Council Chambers in Edina City Hall, 4801 Nest 50th Street at 11:00 A.M.., Thursday, April 12, 1990. The Edina City Council will meet at 7:00 P.M., Monday, April 16, 1990, to consider said bids. The following are approximate major quantities: 1 EA Storm Water Lift Station 11 EA Catch Basins 1,646 LF 16" D.I.P. Force Main 238 LF 6" D.I.P. Force Main 1,490 SY Sod 458 TONS Mn/DOT 2341 Bituminous 1,326 TONS Cl. 5A Gravel Bids shall be in a sealed envelope with a statement thereon shoving the work covered by the bid. Bids should be addressed to the City Engineer, City of Edina, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota, 55424, and may be mailed or submitted personally to the City Engineer. Bids received by the City Engineer, either through the mail or by personal submission, after the time set for receiving them may be returned unopened. work must be done as described in plans and specifications on file in the office of the City Clerk. Plans and specifications are available for a deposit of $25.00 (by check) at the Edina City Hall Engineering Department. Said deposit to be returned upon return of plans and specifications with a bona fide bid. No bids will be considered unless sealed and accompanied by bid bond or certified check payable to the City of Edina in the amount of at lest ten (10) percent of all bids. All plans mailed, enclose separate check for $5.00 payable to the City of Edina for postage and handling. BY ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL. Marcella M. Daehn City Clerk A second to -the motion was made by Member Smith. Mayor Richards asked if there are storm sewer projects requested that are not being proposed at this time. Director Hoffman said staff -is now working on the largest-project which is the Rolling Green area. Mayor Richards said the Council should be made aware of any proposed projects so they could respond to questions from residents. OPENINGS ON THE MWCC GENERAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE NOMINATION NOTED Mayor Richards brought to the attention of the Council the need for nominations to the Metropolitan Waste Control Commission General Advisory Committee of elected officials and stated that applications would be welcome until mid - April. ASSOCIATION OF METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITIES NOMINATIONS TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS WANTED FOR MAY 16, 1990 ANNUAL MEETING Mayor Richards asked if Council Members had any interest in being nominated for the Board of Directors for the AMM, and contact these organizations directly. LETTER RECEIVED FROM RESIDENT MARY ANN MACLENNAN DISCUSSED Member Paulus shared that she had received a letter from Mary Ann MacLennan stating her concerns regarding variances and what is happening in the Country Club District as far as lot sizes, historical places and zoning. Manager Rosland said he would ask the Planning Department to phone her and discuss her concerns. to PHONE CONVERSATION HELD BETWEEN SARAH JONES OF THE SCHOOL DISTRICT AND MAYOR RICHARDS REGARDING TAX INCREMENT FINANCING IN CONNECTION WITH THE REFERENDUM Mayor Richards gave background that there was correspondence in the summer of _ _1989, speaking about the School Board adopting a resolution requesting the Edina -- City Council to rebate the excess tax increment revenue result ng rom the 1� referendum for the fiscal year 1989 -90 and annually thereafter. Subsequently, Mayor Richards told Sarah Jones to submit additional information. Mayor Richards has received a letter from James Hamann, the Director of Business Services for the School District, asking the request be added to the agenda of April 16, 1990. LETTERS RECEIVED FROM ELECTED OFFICIALS REIATIVE TO PENDING LEGISIATION Mayor Richards stated he had heard from all three of the legislators, Senator Storm, and Representatives Pauly and Forsythe, noting their position on the tax increment financing bills and the pay equity issues on comparable worth. Mayor Richards added he would supply copies to all Council Members plus staff, and it should be noted that they have responded and acknowledged our positions. DECISION MADE BY COUNTY ON COMPOSTING TO BE DISCUSSED APRIL 16, 1990 Manager Rosland noted that Hennepin County had made a decision on composting. This will discussed further on April 16, 1990, when the Council meets jointly with the Recycling Commission 6:00 P.M. dK STATE LEGISLATURE (SENATE) ATTEMPTS TO PASS BILL THAT EDINA WOULD LASE $210.000 IN GAS TAX MONEY Manager Rosland stated the Senate is attempting to pass a bill that would mean Edina would lose $210,000 in gas tax money. He stated that Edina is considered a big City with only a few other Cities named, but Edina has.been the focus, and feel Edina is not participator. Manager Rosland said he -had spoken to ;. the AMM and the MLC. They are working hard to:--remove this from.the bill: Mayor - -Richards suggested that letters-be written- to..the various .. bodies we support financially that lobby on behalf of equity', and -fairness, and make. sure: they clearly'. understand our position. They must-be made aware of the situation and be- asked. -_to- lobby against the - adoption of that legislation.. Manager:Rosland commented that two out of the three organizations contacted him this morning and said -they would did not vote to 'o in these organizations,. ' defend= the City" if. that is the type of representation.we receive: The legislative delegation.should be advised =about this. JOINT MEETING TO BE HELD APRIL 16 1990 WITH RECYCLING COMMISSION A joint meeting of the Recycling Commission and the Council will be held at 6:00 P.M. preceding the regular Council meeting April 16, 1990: CLOSED MEETING CALLED TO DISCUSS LABOR NEGOTIATIONS AFTER ADJOURNMENT Manager Rosland said there would be a closed meeting that by law must be approved by the Council, after the adjournment of this meeting to discuss labor negotiations that are going on right now with three unions. Motion made by Member Smith to hold closed meeting following the adjournment of the regular Council Meeting to discuss labor negotiations. A second to the motion was by Member Kelly. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *CLAIMS PAID Motion was made by Member Smith and was seconded by Member Rice to approve payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated 4/2/90 and consisting of 25 pages: General Fund $191,458.21, Communications $6,122.13, Art Center $7,180.76, Capital Fund $1,149.00, Golf Course Fund $32,206.97, Recreation Center Fund $8,385.54, Edinborough Park $8,609.16, Utility Fund $249,023.35, Liquor Dispensary Fund $7,076.66, Construction Fund .$1,197.75, TOTAL $512,409.53 and for confirmation of payment of the following claims as shown _ in detail on the Check Register dated 2/28/90 and_consis_t_ing of 18 pages General_ _ Fund $364,012.68, Art Center $1,354.50, Swimming Pool Fund $289.99, Golf Course Fund $14,792.15, Recreation Center Fund $15,269.03, Gun Range Fund $604.44, Edinborough Park $14,454.20, Utility Fund $20,007.41, Storm Sewer Utility $476.61, Liquor Dispensary.Fund $219,974.74, TOTAL $651,235.75. Motion carried on rollcall vote five ayes. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Richards declared the meeting adjourned at 11:15 P.M. Acting City Clerk Z ch it lose REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item # v.D.' From: GORDON L. HUGHES Consent ❑ - Information Only ❑ Date: JANUARY 2, 1990 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: Fx-1 To Council TAX INCREMENT DISTRICTING Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution • ❑ Ordinance El Discussion Recommendation: - Info /Background: See attached memorandum's of December 27, 1989, and December 14, 1989. DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: M E M O R A N D U M December 27, 1989 Kenneth Rosland City Manager Gordon L. Hughes HRA Executive Director PRELIMINARY WORK PROGRAM - ESTABLISHMENT OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS FOR RETAIL AREAS In accordance with the Council's request, we have developed a preliminary plan and schedule for establishing tax increment financing (T.I.F.) districts.comprising certain retail areas. These areas include 44th /France, Wooddale & Valley View Road and 70th & Cahill. All other retail areas in Edina currently fall within existing T.I.F. districts. T.I.F. DISTRICT ESTABLISHMENT My memo to you of December 14, 1989, (copy attached) describes some of the important legal and financial considerations of tax increment financing. Based on these considerations, I recommend the following strategy: o Establish T.I.F. districts as soon as possible, preferably by March 19, 1990, (reminder: County and School District must receive our plans to create the districts no later than February 19, 1990). o Establish economic development, T.I.F. districts for all retail areas. After establishment, attempt to upgrade all or part of some of these districts to redevelopment districts. (Economic development districts are much easier to establish within the recommended time frame. Redevelopment districts are more difficult to establish but are more advantageous from our perspective). o Attempt to establish T.I.F. districts such that increments can be "pooled" among all these districts. In this way, increments from one district can be used to benefit another district. (Some possible disadvantages to such pooling need to be analyzed prior to implementation). We believe that the initial work required to establish the T.I.F. districts can be accomplished by staff and the City Attorney. It should be noted, however, T.I.F. district establishment requires the preparation of a plan describing proposed development activities, public costs, and impacts on other taxing jurisdictions. Due to the proposed schedule, we will attempt to describe these plans as generally as possible using generous public cost estimates. DEVELOPMENT /REDEVELOPMENT PLANS During the process of establishing the T.I:F. districts we will start work.. on preparing more detailed development and redevelopment plans-. This work. will include contacts with tenants and property owners in the district,• preparation of land -use alternatives and public improvement plans, and more., detailed finance plans. This work will require assistance of the hiring or contracting the following: o 'Planning consultant(s) to prepare land use and public improvement plans . o Project manager to interface with tenants and property owners, planning consultants, and potential developers /redevelopers. This individual could be apart =time contractual employee., PLANNING COSTS At this time, we do not have estimates for costs of establishing the districts. Such costs must be borne by.the City until tax increments are generated by the districts. Such increments can then be used to repay City costs. N M E M O R A N D U M DATE: December 14, 1989 TO: Kenneth Rosland City Manager FROM: Gordon Hughes HRA Executive Director . SUBJECT: COMMERCIAL AREA REDEVELOPMENT You mentioned that on December 16, 1989, the Council will discuss, among other things, commercial area redevelopment activities. It is my understanding that some members of the Council believe the City should encourage and participate in redevelopment initiatives in our retail districts, particularly Grandview, Cahill /70th Street, 44th /France and Wooddale/Valley View. Assuming that the City has not imposed regulations or ordinances which have discouraged private redevelopment, then the issue, in my view, is whether or not the City is willing to offer financial assistance to facilitate redevelopment. In that tax increment financing is the only significant fiscal tool available for such public financing, I thought an overview of tax increment financing would be useful. TYPES OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS Three types of tax increment financing districts are permitted by state law: o Housing Districts o Redevelopment Districts o Economic Development Districts The Grandview Area, 50th & France and Edinborough /Centennial Lakes are presently located within redevelopment districts. Southdale /Galleries is located in an economic development district. We have no housing districts. Redevelopment and housing districts may remain in existence for 25 years. Therefore, they possess the greatest potential for tax increment collections. However, stringent statutory tests make these districts difficult to establish. To. qualify as a redevelopment district, 20% of the buildings in the proposed district must suffer structural defects or a combination of difficiencies in utilities and facilities, and other defects or deficiencies of a significance to justify substantial renovation or clearance. An additional 30% of the buildings must require renovation or clearance to remove conditions such as inadequate street layout, incompatible land uses, overcrowding, or obsolescence. Although we have not analyzed these districts in detail, it may be difficult to meet these statuatory tests in the Cahill /70th Street, 44th Street /France Avenue, and Wooddale/Valley View Road retail areas. It should be noted that the statuatory tests have become more stringent since the 50th & France district was established. Housing districts, of course, would be of limited value for commercial area redevelopment unless a major change in land use is desired. Even so, state law now requires that beneficiaries of such districts meet very stringent income tests. If we cannot meet the-tests for redevelopment districts, and if housing districts are not appropriate for the situation, then we are limited to creating economic development districts. Economic development districts have two restrictions that limit the potential for significant redevelopment activities. 1) Districts are limited to 8 -10 years in duration rather than 25 years as with redevelopment or housing districts. 2) The base value of such districts is not absolutely frozen, rather it increases annually at the average inflation rate of the district during the prior five years. Both of these restrictions limit the economic potential of such districts, especially in cases where a relatively immediate addition of new taxable value does not occur. TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT ESTABLISHMENT I will not attempt to outline all of the steps in tax increment district establishment. The Council should be aware, however, that it requires more than simply adopting a resolution. A plan and program must be prepared for each district which includes a proposed budget, a description of the public costs involved, a projection of anticipated tax increments, and an assessment of impacts on other taxing jurisdictions. Such jurisdictions are entitled to review and comment on these assessments prior to district establishment. FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS As mentioned earlier, certain restrictions limit the viability 6f economic development districts. Even with the more liberal requirements of redevelopment districts, if additional taxable value is not added to the district during flat inflationary times, relatively few increments are collected to repay public costs. For example, the 50th & France district may not have produced tax increments needed to repay the HRA's debt were it not for double digit inflation during the early years of the district. Generally speaking, the financial success of a tax increment district in a retail area is dependent upon an increase in the intensity of development and the resulting increase in tax revenues. Of the three district mentioned, 70th Street and Cahill probably offers the greatest tax increment potential because of the opportunity to capture the Cahill school property prior to redevelopment. Valley View/Wooddale and 44th & France suffer from the problem of, on one hand, having little or no vacant sites to capture, and on the other hand, having difficulty meeting the test for a redevelopment district. �J LEGISLATIVE CHANGES Tax increment financing continues to be an unpopular fiscal tool in the view of many legislators. The 1989 property tax law established additional restrictions regarding tax increment use. It is very likely that further restrictions will be considered in the coming legislative session. With regard to future restrictions, the Council should be aware of the following possibilities. First, key legislators have become very critical of economic development districts. Many of us believe that a serious effort will be undertaken to prohibit such districts altogether. Therefore, if redevelopment districts cannot be justified for our retail areas, then I suggest that economic development districts be established as soon as possible. Second,-legislation was introduced in the 1989 session which would have impacted existing tax increment districts with outstanding debt. Up until then, staff believed that such retroactive restrictions would not be considered. However, key legislators now seem interested in such restriction. Therefore, we can no longer be assured that existing districts are safe from legislative changes that impact our ability to repay public costs. Third, certain legislative changes indirectly affect existing tax increment districts. For example, the 1988 tax law changes relating to state paid homestead indirectly and apparently inadvertently impacted the Centennial Lakes /Edinborough district. OTHER FUNDING SOURCES - HRA LEVY As mentioned earlier, tax increment financing is the only significant tool available for public financing of retail redevelopment. However, the HRA could impose an HRA levy in addition to the City's normal levy. This HRA levy can be made outside of the City's normal levy limit imposed by the State. According to my information, the annual HRA levy cannot exceed .0131% of our taxable market value. This would total about $350,000 annually that could be targeted at retail redevelopment. The Council, of course, should understand that this would constitute an increase in our local levy against Edina taxpayers. SUMMARY 1. Tax increment financing is virtually the only significant fiscal tool available to assist retail redevelopment. However, the HRA could impose a levy against all taxable property in the City which could be targeted to retail redevelopment. 2. Redevelopment districts (i.e. 25 year districts) may be difficult to establish at 44th & France, Wooddale & Valley View, and 70th & Cahill due to the statutory tests that must be met. Economic development districts (8- 10.year districts) are possible for all retail districts. Such districts should be established as soon as possible because of anticipated legislative restrictions. Tax increment districts, especially economic development districts, rely upon an increase in development intensity to produce sufficient increments for repayment of public costs. This is especially true during flat inflationary times. 4. The legislature continues to consider additional restrictions for tax _ increment financing. Some of these restrictions may be retroactive in nature and, therefore, could adversely impact tax increment districts which existed prior to passage of the restrictions. l+ o 71 Cn r • drpM��� • REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: HRA COMMISSIONERS From: GORDON L. HUGHES EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Date: MARCH 19, 1990 Agenda Item # HRA II. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends [E To HRA Subject: ' ❑ To Council PRELIMINARY REPORT - TAX INCREMENT DISTRICTS Action El Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Provide comments and direction to staff concerning the proposed tax increment financing plans. Schedule public hearing for April 2, 1990. Info /Background: In accordance with the Council's request, we have prepared draft plans supporting the establishment of tax increment financing districts at Valley View Road and Wooddale Avenue, 44th Street and France Avenue and 70th Street and Cahill Road. These preliminary plans have been prepared with the assistance of the Hoisington Group, our planning consultant. J.Peter Meyers has also assisted us in discussions with the business community. These plans are in the draft stage and we would welcome your comments and direction concerning them. PLAN PREPARATION AND REVIEW PROCESS Prior to commencing plan preparation, staff and our consultant met individually with the 5 or 6 key business persons from each of the three retail areas. The purpose of these meetings was to obtain their comments and recommendations concerning the area and to determine if they had particular plans relating to their businesses. Following these meetings our consultants prepared preliminary land use and public improvement plans. Report and Recommendation March 19, 1990 Page Two On February 27, 1990, staff and the consultant conducted an open meeting with each of the three retail areas. At these meetings we presented our preliminary plans and obtained any comments and recommendations from those in attendance. It should be noted that these meetings were very well attended by the business community. On February .28, 1990, the preliminary plans were likewise presented to the Community Development and Planning Commission for their informal review. Following these meetings, our consultant revised and refined the land use plans which are included in this packet of materials. At the same time, our staff has drafted the narrative that will accompany the plans. These drafts are likewise attached. Our legal counsel is presently in the process of preparing the legal documents necessary for district establishment. The purpose of the March 19, 1990, Council review, is to obtain your comments and recommendations concerning the preliminary plans: We will then be able to provide revisions to these plans prior to the April 2, 1990, hearing. Although the March 19th review is not a scheduled public hearing, we have invited those individuals who were in attendance at the February 27, 1990, meeting, as well'as other individuals who have called to inquire about our plans. We expect that some of these individuals would like to offer comments to the Council. The Community Development and Planning Commission will again review the proposed plans at their March 28, 1990, meeting, and we hope will pass a recommendation on to the Council for your consideration on April 2, 1990. STATUS OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING LEGISLATION As you know, legislation adverse to tax increment financing has been introduced in both houses of the legislature. Adoption of this legislation would likely restrict our ability to create some or all of the three proposed tax increment financing districts. Based on our understanding of these bills, it would be important to establish these districts prior to April 30, 1990, as this appears to be the proposed effective date of this legislation. PRELIMINARY PLANS Although the effective date of pending tax increment legislation is April 30, 1990, it should be noted that certain portions of the proposed legislation may affect districts that are created prior to April 30. In particular, the legislation may affect our ability to amend existing tax increment financing plans at a later date. Therefore, the proposed retail plans provide for a wide range of public involvement based on the reasoning that it may be difficult to expand the scope of these plans in the future. For example, the plans provide for the possibility of public acquisition of properties for redevelopment purposes, even though at a later date, the City may elect not to participate in such acquisitions. Report and Recommendation March 19, 1990 Page Three It is important to know that adoption of'the tax increment financing plans and districts does not commit the City to implement the plans. Establishment of the districts provides the financial basis for future City or HRA participation. Therefore, the plan should be viewed as schematic in nature. FINANCE PLANS Finance plans will be incorporated into the legal documents presented on April 2. As with the land use plans, we have included a wide range of potential public expenditures including the possible public acquisition of properties to facilitate development /redevelopment. Some of these possible acquisitions include single family homes particularly at 44th and France. Again, our strategy has been to include all possibilities recognizing that legislation may restrict our ability to expand plans in the future. Our preliminary public cost budgets are provided in Exhibit A. At this time, we have not attempted to determine if adequate tax increments will exist to support such expenditures. In our view, such analyses are best performed at the time specific projects are proposed. Ste. Staff is very anxious to receive your comments and direction concerning these draft plans. Your requested revisions can then be accommodated into the plans which are presented for public hearing on April 2, 1990. DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 2 and TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLANS FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICTS 90 -1 (44th and France), 90 -2 (Valley View and Wooddale) and 90 -3 (70th and Cahill), April 2, 1990 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TABLE OF CONTENTS This Table of Contents is for convenience of reference only and is not part of the Development Program or the Tax Increment Financing Plan. Paae I. INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 A. Statement of Need and'Statutory Authority 1 B. Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 II. DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTNO. 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 A. Property To Be Included in Development District . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 B. Development Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 C. Operation of Development District . . . . . . . . 4 D. Estimated Capital and Administrative Costs.. . 4 E. Property Acquisition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 III. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 90 -1 (44TH AND FRANCE) . . . . . . . . . . . 6 A. Statement of Objectives and Development Program 6 B. Property To Be Included in Tax Increment District . . . . . . . 6 C. Estimated Capital and Administration Costs . . 6 D. Payment of Capital and Administrative Costs . . . 6 E. Determination and'Use of Tax Increment . . . . . . 7 F. Impact of Tax Increment Financing on Other Taxing Jurisdictions . . . . . . . . . . 9 IV. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 90 -2 (VALLEY VIEW AND WOODDALE) . . . . . . . . . 10 A. Statement of Objectives and Development Program 10 B. Property To Be Included in Tax Increment District . . . . 10 C. Estimated Capital and Administration Costs 11 D. Payment of Capital and Administrative Costs 11 E. Determination and Use of Tax Increment . . . . . . 12 F. Impact of Tax Increment Financing on Other Taxing Jurisdictions . . . . . . . . . . 13 V. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 90 -3 (70TH AND CAHILL) . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 A. Statement of Objectives and Development Program 14 B. Property To Be Included in Tax Increment District . . . . . . . 14 C. Estimated Capital and Administration Costs . . . . 14 D. Payment of Capital and Administrative Costs . . . 15 E. Determination and Use of Tax Increment . . . . . . 15 F. Impact of Tax Increment Financing on Other Taxing Jurisdictions . . . . . . . . . . 17 VI. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROGRAM AND PLANS . . . . . . . 18 VII. AMENDMENTS,TO PROGRAM AND PLANS . . . . . . . . . . . 18 EXHIBITS A. Map of Development District No. 2 B. Development Plan C. List of Parcels in Tax Increment Financing District 90 -1 D. Staff Report Evidencing Tax Increment Financing District No. 90 -1 Meets Redevelopment District Criteria E. Estimated Tax Increment for Tax Increment Financing District 90 -1 F. List of Parcels in Tax Increment Financing District 90 -2 G. Estimated Tax Increment for Tax Increment Financing District No. 90 -2 H. List of Parcels in Tax Increment Financing District 90 -3 I. Estimated Tax Increment for Tax Increment Financing District 90 -3 I. INTRODUCTION A. Statement of Need and Statutory Authority. The commercial areas in City of Edina located in the vicinity of West 44th Street and France Avenue, Valley View Road and Wooddale Avenue and West 70th Street and Cahill Road currently have certain deficiencies relating to traffic circulation, parking, land use and physical development which detracts from these areas. The City Council has determined that the City may be able to assist in the alleviation of such deficiencies and that in order to provide such assistance it is necessary to include these three areas in a Development District to be designated as Development District No. 2 and to take certain action pursuant to a Development Program (the "Program "). .In order to finance the capital and administration costs of the Program, it is proposed that the City adopt tax increment financing plans (the "Plans "), which provide for the creation of Tax Increment Financing Districts 90 -1 (44th and France), 90 -2 (Valley View and Wooddale) and 90 -3 (70th and Cahill) (the "Districts "). The Program and the Plans are adopted by the City Council of the City pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 to 469.047 and 469.174 to 469.179. B. Definitions. Each of the words and terms defined in this Section shall for all purposes of the Program and the Plan, have the meanings given to them in this Section B:. "Bonds" means the tax increment bonds and any other obligations issued by the City, the principal of and interest on which are payable in whole or in part out of the Tax Increment, to finance or provide for the payment of the Capital and Administrative Cost. ' "Bond Resolution" means any and all resolutions, ordinances, trust indentures or other documents under which any Bonds are sold, issued or secured. "Capital and Administrative Costs" means the total amount expended and to be expended by the City on Development Activities as provided in the Program and Plans. "Captured Tax Capacity" means for such Tax Increment District that portion of the Tax Capacity for such Tax Increment District in excess of the Original Tax Capacity for such Tax Increment District as adjusted from time to time, if any. "City" means the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota. "Development Activities" means all actions taken or to be taken by the City or HRA in establishing, implementing and carrying out the,Program. "Development District" means Development District No. 2 of the City as established pursuant to this Program. "HRA" means the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota. "Original Tax Capacity „ means the Net Tax Capacity of all taxable property in the Tax Increment District as most recently determined by the Commissioner of Revenue of the State of Minnesota as of the date of certification thereof by the County Auditor pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177 and as thereafter adjusted and certified by the County Auditor pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177. "Outstanding” when used with respect to the Bonds, means Bonds which have not been paid, redeemed or discharged in accordance with their terms or the terms of a Bond Resolution. "Parcel" means a lot, parcel or tract of plat of land comprising a single unit for - purposes of assessment for real estate tax purposes, as of the date of adoption of this Plan. ".Plans" means the Tag Increment Financing Plans for each of the Districts as approved and as supplemented and amended from time to time by the City Council of the City. "Program" means this Development Program as supplemented and amended from time to time by the City Council of the City. "Tax Capacity" means the net tag capacity of all taxable property in a District as determined from time to time pursuant to state law. "Tag Capacity Rate" means with respect to taxes payable in any year the lesser of (i) the local taxing district tax capacity rates for taxes payable in such year or (ii) the "original tax capacity rate" for a Tax Increment District as defined and calculated in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, Subdivision la. "Tax Increment" means that portion of the ad valorem taxes generated by the extension of the Tag Capacity Rate to -2- the Captured Tax Capaci Increment District. "Tax Increment Financing District 90 -1 "Tax Increment Financing District 90 -2 "Tax Increment Financing District 90 -3 ty of taxable property in District 90 -1" means Tax (44th and France) of the District 90 -2" means Tax (Valley View and Wooddal, District 90 -3" means Tax (70th and Cahill) of the a Tax Increment City. Increment B) of the City. Increment City. "Tax Increment Districts" means collectively Tax Increment Financing District 90 -1, 90 -2, and 90 -3. -3- II. DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 2 A. Property To Be Included in Development District. The Parcels located in the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, set forth in Exhibit A hereto, shall constitute the Development. District. B. Development Plan. The Development Plan for the Development District appears as Exhibit B hereto. To the extent that any proposed uses in the. Development Plan conflict with the City's Comprehensive Plan, such uses will not be permitted unless and until the Comprehensive Plan is amended to permit such use. C. Operation of Development District. Unless otherwise directed by the City, the maintenance and operation of the public improvements constructed in the District will be the responsibility of the HRA, as administrator of the District. Each year the HRA will submit to the City Council the maintenance and operation budget for the Development District for the following year. The HRA will administer the Development District pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.131; provided, however, that the HRA may exercise the powers listed in said Section 469.131 only at the direction of the City Council. D. Estimated Capital and Administrative Costs. The estimated Capital and Administrative Costs of the Program are as follows: avital Cost- 44th and Valley View 70th and -4- France and Wooddale Cahill Property Acquisition $1,330,000 $153,800 $529,400 Demolition 200,000 40,000 150,000 Interest Assistance 175,000 100,000 150,000 Relocation 280,000 46,000 160,000 Public Improvements (Parking, Utilities, Landscaping, Street Vacation) 530,000 190,000 175,000 Historic Building Relocation - - 150,000 Total $2,515,000 $529,000 $1,314,400 -4- Financinq_ and Administrative Costs and Continaen Legal, Fiscal and Administrative $ 500,000 Capitalized Interest 750,000 Bond Discount 105,000 Contingency 654,000 Total $2,009,000 The elements and costs shown above are estimated to be necessary based upon information now available. It is anticipated that the Capital and Administrative Costs may decrease or increase. The City reserves the right to pay any of the Capital and Administrative Costs from the proceeds of Tax Increment Bonds or directly from Tax Increment. .E. Property AcQuisition. In carrying out the Program the City may acquire certain property in the Development District. The Development Plan for the Development District envisions that it may be necessary for the City to acquire any right of way necessary for public improvements and to acquire the following property in the Development District to assist in the development of the property in the Development District in accordance with the Program: 44th and France Area Edina Cleaners Rapid Oil Storage Garage 4532 France Avenue South 4536 France Avenue South 3916 W. 44th Street 3918 W. 44th Street 3920 W. 44th Street 3924 W. 44th Street 3930 W. 44th Street 3936 W. 44th Street Valley View and Wooddale Roster's 6120 Kellogg 70th and Cahill Union Oil Coit Warehouse -5- III. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 90 -1 (44TH AND FRANCE) A. Statement of Obiectives and Development Program. See Section B of the Program. B. Property To Be Included in Tax Increment District. The Parcels located in the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota set forth on Exhibit C•shall constitute the T =4 TncrPment District No. 90 -1. C. Estimated Capital and Administration Costs. 1. Capital Proceeds. The capital proceeds of the project, comprising.the proceeds--of sale of any land acquired by the City to private developers, are expected to be $0.00. 2. Capital and Administration Costs. The Capital and Administration Costs of the Development District, comprising the total costs expected to be incurred in carrying out the Development Activities by the City is expected to be as shown in Section D of the Program, plus interest to be paid on the Tax Increment Bonds during their term (other than interest paid from the proceeds of the Tax Increment Bonds). 3. Property to be Acquired. See Section E of the Program. D. Payment of Capital and Administrative Costs. 1. In General. All Capital and Administrative Costs will be paid from Tax Increment either directly or indirectly by payment of debt service on Tax Increment Bonds issued to finance such cost or reimbursement for items of Capital and Administrative Costs paid directly by the City. 2. Issuance of Bonds. It is presently expected that all or a portion of the Capital and Administrative Costs will be financed by the issuance of the Tax Increment Bonds. The Tax Increment Bonds will be issued by the City under authority of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475, and Sections 469.174 to 469.179. The principal amount of the Bonds is expected to be $6,370,000. The actual principal amount of the Bonds, however, may be less than or exceed this amount, and the right to issue the Bonds in an amount greater than $6,370,000 to finance such Capital and Administrative Costs is reserved. Similarly, the amount allocated to capitalized interest covers interest payable on the Bonds (net of investment income on proceeds of the Bonds) at an initial rate now estimated to be approximately 8% per annum for a 18 -month period; and the City reserves the right to increase or decrease the amount of capitalized interest to correspond to the interest actually payable on the Bonds over the 18 -month period. 3. Security For Bonds. The Bonds will be general obligations of the City, and the City will pledge its full faith, credit and unlimited taxing powers to the payment of principal thereof and interest thereon. The principal of and interest on the Bonds are payable primarily, however, from the Tax Increments from one or more of the Tax Increment Districts and no ad valorem tax is expected to be levied for payment of the Bonds and interest thereon in the Bond Resolution. All Tax Increments will be pledged and appropriated to the payment of the Bonds and the interest thereon when due. In addition,'such principal and interest will be paid from certain proceeds of the Bonds (capitalized interest) and interest earnings thereon. 4. Bond Terms. The terms of the Tax Increment Bonds are expected to be as set forth below; however, the .right is reserved to adjust any and all terms of the Tax Increment Bonds to secure the best interest rate obtainable and to insure that the entire principal of and interest on the Tax Increment Bonds will be paid when due from the sources specified in paragraph 3. The Tax Increment Bonds will be issued in one or more series, in the aggregate principal amount of $6,370,000, will mature serially over a period of approximately twenty (20) years from the date of receipt by the City of the first Tax Increment from the Tax Increment Districts, will be subject to redemption prior to maturity, will bear a fixed rate or rates of interest from date of issue to maturity, payable semiannually commencing approximately six months after the issuance thereof, and will be sold at public or private sale. E. Determination and Use of Tax Increment. 1. Statutory Authority and Tax Increment District 90-1 Eligibility as an Redevelopment District. Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 10 defines a "redevelopment district" as a tax increment financing district consisting of a portion of a development district which is 70% of the Parcels in which are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities or other improvements and 20% of the buildings are structurally substandard and the additional 30% of the buildings require substantial renovation or clearance to remove such existing conditions as: inadequate street layout, -7- incompatible uses or land use relationships, overcrowding of buildings on the land, excessive dwelling unit density, obsolete buildings not suitable for improvement or conversion,. or other identified hazards to the health, safety, and general well -being of the community. Based upon a report of City staff attached hereto as Exhibit D, the City believes Tax Increment District 90 -1 is a "redevelopment district" since the conditions set forth in the preceding paragraph are satisfied with respect to Tax Increment District 90 -1. 2. Original Tax Capacity. The Tax Capacity of all taxable property in Tax Increment District 90 -1 as most recently certified by the Commissioner of Revenue of the State of Minnesota, being the certification made in 1989 with respect to the Tax Capacity of such property as of January 2, 1989, is $116,578. 3. Current Tax Capacity. The current Tax Capacity of property in Tax Increment District 90 -1 is $116,578, the Original Tax Capacity. 4. Captured Tax Capacity. It is expected that the Captured Tax Capacity of all taxable property in Tax Increment District 90 -1, upon completion of the improvements in Tax Increment District 90 -1 described in the Program (taxes payable 2015) in Tax Increment District 90 -1, will be $177,920, computed as follows: Estimated Tax Capacity . . . . . . $294,498 at Completion Less Original Tax-Capacity . . . . 116,578 at Completion Estimated Captured Tax Capacity at Completion . . . . . $177,920 5. Tax Increment Calculation. Assuming the Anticipated Private Developments occur as described and provided in the Program it is estimated that the Tax Increment to be received each year for the duration of Tax Increment District 90 -1 will be as set forth in Exhibit E hereto. The estimated amount of Tax Increment set forth in Exhibit E is based upon a Tax Capacity Rate of .90098. 6. Duration of Tax Increment District 90 -1. It is estimated that Tax Increment District 90 -1 will remain in existence until 25 years from the date of receipt by the City -8- of the first Tax Increment from Tax Increment District 90 -1, or until the City's obligation to pay the Tax Increment Bonds and interest has been discharged in accordance with the Bond Resolution. 7. Use of Captured Tax Capacity and Tax Increment. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, Subdivision 2, the City hereby determines that it will use 100% of the Captured Tax Capacity of property located in Tax Increment District 90 -1, and 100% of the Tax Increments to be derived therefrom, for the entire duration of Tax Increment District 90 -1. 8. Excess Tax Increment. The Tax Increment received from Tax Increment District 90 -1 in any year not needed to pay debt service on the Tax Increment Bonds coming due on or before August 1 of the following year, shall be used first to reduce any ad valorem property tax levied pursuant to and in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.61, Subdivision 3,.and then shall be used to prepay or discharge outstanding Tax Increment Bonds or pay additional Capital and Administration Costs, all in accordance with the Bond Resolution. 9. Pooling of Tax Increment. Tax Increment received from Tax Increment District 90 -1 will be pooled by the City with all other Tax Increment received from the Tax Increment Districts and will be available for expenditure for any Capital and Administrative Costs, whether or not such Capital and Administrative Costs are incurred with respect to property included in Tax Increment District 90 -1. F. Impact of Tax Increment Financing on Other Taxing Jurisdictions. The local government units other than the City which are authorized by law to levy ad valorem property taxes and in which Tax Increment District 90 -1 is located, are Independent School District No. 273, Hennepin County, the HRA, and various metropolitan area authorities, including the Metropolitan Council, the Metropolitan Transit Commission, the Metropolitan Airports Commission and the Metropolitan Mosquito Control District (the local government units). The taxing jurisdictions encompassing Tax Increment District 90 -1 will continue to receive taxes as if the Original Tax Capacity of Tax Increment District 90 -1 were unchanged, except for the increase in Original Tax Capacity described in Part F(2) of this Plan. This precludes the jurisdictions from benefiting from a portion of the increase in Tax Capacity which results from the improvements in Tax Increment District 90 -1 -9- described in the Program or other development of the taxable property in Tax Increment District 90 -1. In order to assess the impact of this on Hennepin County, Independent School District No. 273 and the City the following table indicates what percentage the anticipated Captured Tax Capacity of Tax Increment District-90 -1 at the completion of the improvements in Tax Increment District 90 -1 described in the Program (which occurs for taxes payable in 2015 as shown on Exhibit E hereto), is of the present total Tax Capacity for such taxing jurisdiction. If Tax Increment District 90 -1 were not created and the improvements occur in Tax Increment District 90 -1 as described in the Program, all of the Captured Tax Capacity of Tax Increment District 90 -1 would be available to the taxing jurisdictions, which would result in an increase in the tax capacity of such taxing jurisdictions in each year during the duration of Tax Increment District 90 -1 in an amount equal to the Captured Tax Capacity, IV. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 90 -2 (VALLEY VIEW AND WOODDALE) A. Statement of Objectives and Development Program. See Section B of the Development Program. B. Property To Be Included in Tax Increment District. The Parcels located in the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota set forth on Exhibit F shall constitute Tax Increment District 90 -2. -10- Estimated Captured Tax Capacity Percent of Present at Completion Present Taxing Tax of Total Tax Jurisdiction Capacity Improvements Capacity Hennepin County $1,034,463,652 $177,920 .02% I.S.D. No. 273 63,744,885 177,920 .2 City of Edina 77,629,266 177,920 .233$ % If Tax Increment District 90 -1 were not created and the improvements occur in Tax Increment District 90 -1 as described in the Program, all of the Captured Tax Capacity of Tax Increment District 90 -1 would be available to the taxing jurisdictions, which would result in an increase in the tax capacity of such taxing jurisdictions in each year during the duration of Tax Increment District 90 -1 in an amount equal to the Captured Tax Capacity, IV. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 90 -2 (VALLEY VIEW AND WOODDALE) A. Statement of Objectives and Development Program. See Section B of the Development Program. B. Property To Be Included in Tax Increment District. The Parcels located in the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota set forth on Exhibit F shall constitute Tax Increment District 90 -2. -10- C. Estimated Capital and Administration Costs. 1. Capital Proceeds. The capital proceeds of the project, comprising the proceeds of sale of any land acquired by the City to private developers, are expected to be $0.00. 2. Capital and Administration Costs. The Capital and Administration Costs of the Development District, comprising the total costs expected to be incurred in carrying out the Development Activities by the City is expected to be as shown in Section D of the Program, plus interest to be paid on the Tax Increment Bonds during their term (other than interest paid from the proceeds of the Tax Increment Bonds). .3. Property to be Acquired. See Section E of the Program. D. Payment of Capital and Administrative Costs. See Section D of the Plan for Tax Increment District 90 -1. E. Determination and Use of Tax Increment. 1. Statutory Authority and District Eligibility as an Economic Development District. Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 12 defines an "economic development district" as a tax increment financing district consisting of a portion of a development district which the authority finds to be in the public interest because it will discourage commerce, industry or manufacturing from moving their operations to another state, will result in increased employment in the municipality or will result in preservation and enhancement of the tax base of the municipality. The City believes, -Tax Increment District 90 -2 is an "economic development district" since the Development Activities to occur in Tax Increment District 90 -2 will result in preservation and enhancement of the tax base of the City. 2. Original Tax Capacity. The Tax Capacity of all taxable property in Tax Increment District 90 -2 as most recently certified by the Commissioner of Revenue of the State of Minnesota, being the certification made in 1989 with respect to the Tax Capacity of such property as of January 2, 1989, is $74,536, which amount is expected to be the Original Tax Capacity of Tax Increment District 90 -2, subject to adjustment of 4.24% per year pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, Subdivision 1, based on the average percentage increase in the assessed valuation of property in Tax Increment District 90 -2 during the last five years. -11- 3. Current Tax Capacity. The current Tax Capacity of property in Tax Increment District 90 -2 is $74,536, the Original Tax Capacity. 4. Captured Tax Capacity. It is expected that the Captured Tax Capacity of all taxable property in Tax Increment District 90 -2, upon completion of the improvements in Tax Increment District 90 -2 described in the Program (taxes payable 2000) in Tax Increment District 90 -2, will be $10,468, computed as follows: Estimated Tax Capacity . . . $123,373 at Completion Less Original Tax Capacity . . . 112,904 at Completion Estimated Captured Tax Capacity at Completion . . . . . $ 10,468 5. Tax Increment Calculation. Assuming the improvements in Tax Increment District 90 -2 occur as described and provided in the Program hereto it is estimated that the Tax Increment to be received each year for the duration of Tax Increment District 90 -2 will be as set forth in Exhibit G hereto. The estimated amount of Tax Increment set forth in Exhibit G is based upon a Tax Capacity Rate of .90098. 6. Duration of the Tax Increment District 90 -2. It is estimated that Tax Increment District 90 -2 will remain in existence until the 8 years from the date of receipt of the first Tax Increment from Tax Increment District 90 -2 or 10 years from the date of approval of this Plan, whichever is earlier, or until the City's obligation to pay the.Tax Increment Bonds and interest has been discharged in accordance with the Bond Resolution. 7. Use of Captured Tax Capacity and Tax Increment. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, Subdivision 2, the City hereby determines that it will use 100% of the Captured Tax Capacity of property located in Tax Increment District 90 -2, and 100% of the Tax Increments to be derived therefrom, for the entire duration of Tax Increment District 90 -2. 8. Excess Tax Increment. The Tax Increment received from Tax Increment District 90 -2 in any year not needed to pay debt service on the Tax Increment Bonds coming due on or before August 1 of the following year, shall be used first to reduce any ad valorem property tax levied pursuant to and in accordance -12- with Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.61, Subdivision 3, and then shall be used to prepay or discharge outstanding Tax Increment Bonds or pay additional Capital and Administration Costs, all in accordance with the Bond Resolution. 9. Pooling of Tax Increment. Tax Increment received from Tax Increment District 90 -2 will be pooled by the City with all other Tax Increment received from the Tax Increment Districts and will be available for expenditure for any Capital and Administrative Costs, whether or not such Capital and Administrative Costs are incurred with respect to property included in Tax Increment District 90 =2. F. Impact of Tax Increment Financing on Other Taxing Jurisdictions. The local government units other than the City which are authorized by law to levy ad valorem property taxes and in which Tax Increment District 90 -2 is located, are Independent School District No. 273, Hennepin County, the HRA, and various metropolitan area authorities, including the Metropolitan Council, the Metropolitan Transit Commission, the Metropolitan Airports Commission and the Metropolitan Mosquito Control District (the local government units). The taxing jurisdictions encompassing Tax Increment District 90 -2 will continue to receive taxes as if the Original Tax Capacity of Tax Increment District 90 -2 were unchanged, except for the increase in Original Tax Capacity described in Part F(2) of this Plan. This precludes the jurisdictions from benefiting from a portion of the increase in Tax Capacity which results from the improvements in Tax Increment District 90 -2 described in the Program or other development of the taxable property in Tax Increment'District 90 -2. In order to assess the impact of this on Hennepin County, Independent School District No. 273 and the City the following table indicates what percentage the anticipated Captured Tax Capacity of Tax Increment District 90 -2 at the completion of the improvements in Tax Increment District 90 -2 described in the Program (which occurs for taxes payable in 2000 as shown on Exhibit G hereto), is of the present total Tax Capacity for such taxing jurisdiction. -13- Taxing Jurisdiction Hennepin County I.S.D. No.- -273 City of Edina Present Tax Capacity $1,034,463,652 63,744,885 77,629,266 Estimated Captured Tax Capacity at Completion of Improvements $10,4,68 10,468 10,468 Percent of Present Total Tax Capacity less than .01% .02% .01% If Tax Increment District 90 -2 were not created and the improvements occur in Tax Increment District 90 -2 as described in the Program, all of the Captured Tax Capacity of Tax Increment District 90 -2 would be available to the taxing jurisdictions, which would result in an increase in the tax capacity of such taxing jurisdictions in each year during the duration of Tax Increment District 90 -2 in an amount equal to the Captured Tax Capacity. V. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 90 -3 (70TH AND CAHILL) A. Statement of Obiectives and Development Program. See Section A of the Development Program. B. Property To Be•Included in Tax Increment District 90 -3. The Parcels located in the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota set forth on Exhibit H shall constitute Tax Increment District 90 -3. C. Estimated Capital and Administration Costs. 1. Capital Proceeds. The capital proceeds of the project, comprising the proceeds of sale of any land acquired by the City to private developers, are expected to be $0.00. 2. Capital and Administration Costs. The Capital and Administration Costs of the Development District, comprising the total costs expected to be incurred in carrying out the Development Activities by the City is expected to be as shown in Section D of the Program, plus interest to be paid on the Tax Increment Bonds during their term (other than interest paid from the proceeds of the Tax Increment Bonds). -14- 3. Property to be Acquired. See Section E of the Program. D. Payment of Capital and Administrative Costs. See Section D of the plan for Tax Increment District 90 -1. E. Determination and Use of Tax Increment. 1. Statutory Authority and District Eligibility as an Economic Development District. Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision 12 defines an "economic development district" as a tax increment financing district consisting of a portion of a development district which the authority.finds to be in the public interest because it will discourage commerce, industry or manufacturing from moving their operations to another state, will result in increased employment in the municipality or will result in preservation and enhancement.of the tax base of the municipality. The City believes Tax Increment District 90 -3 is an "economic development district" since the Development Activities to occur in Tax Increment District 90 -3 will result in the preservation and enhancement of the tax base of the City. 2. Original Tax Capacity. The Tax Capacity of all taxable property in Tax Increment District 90 -3 as most recently certified by the Commissioner of Revenue of the State of Minnesota, being the certification made in 1989 with respect to the Tax Capacity of such property as of January 2, 1989, is $270,426, which amount is expected to be the Original Tax Capacity of Tax Increment District 90 -3, subject to adjustment of 5.10% per year pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, Subdivision 1, based on the average percentage increase in the assessed va- luation of property in Tax Increment District 90 -3 during the last five years. 3. Current Tax Capacity. The current Tax Capacity of property in Tax Increment District 90 -3 is $270,426, the Original Tax Capacity. 4. Captured Tax Capacity. It is expected that the Captured Tax Capacity of all taxable property in Tax Increment District 90 -3, upon completion of the improvements in Tax Increment District 90 -3 (taxes payable 2000) in Tax Increment District 90 -3, will be $306,941, computed as follows: -15- Estimated Tax Capacity . . . . . . $751,650 at Completion Less Original Tax Capacity . . . . 444,709 at Completion Estimated Captured Tax Capacity at Completion' $306,941 5. Tax Increment Calculation. Assuming the improvements in Tax Increment District 90, -3 occur as described and provided in the Program hereto it is estimated that the Tax Increment to be received each year for the duration of Tax Increment District 90 -3 will be as set forth in Exhibit I hereto. The estimated amount of Tag Increment set forth in Exhibit I is based upon a Tax Capacity Rate of .90290. 6. Duration of the Tax Increment District 90 -3. It is estimated that Tax Increment District 90 -3 will remain in existence until the 8 years from the date of receipt of the first Tax Increment from Tax Increment District 90 -3 or 10 years from the date of approval of this Plan, whichever is earlier, or until the City's obligation to pay the Tax Increment Bonds and interest has been discharged in accordance with the Bond Resolution. 7. Use of Captured Tax Capacity and Tax Increment. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, Subdivision 2, the City hereby determines that it will use 100% of the Captured Tax Capacity of property located in Tax Increment District 90 -3, and 100% of the Tax Increments to be derived therefrom, for the entire duration of Tax Increment District 90 -3. 8. Excess Tax Increment. The Tax Increment received from Tax Increment District 90 -3 in any year not needed to pay debt service on the Tax Increment Bonds coming due on or before August 1 of the following year, shall be used first to reduce any ad valorem property tax levied pursuant to and in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.61, Subdivision 3, and then shall be used to prepay or discharge outstanding Tax Increment Bonds or pay additional Capital and Administration Costs, all in accordance with the Bond Resolution. 9. Pooling of Tax Increment. Tax Increment received from Tax Increment District 90 -3 will be pooled by the City with all other Tax Increment received from the Tax Increment Districts and will be available for expenditure for any Capital and Administrative Costs, whether or not such Capital and Administrative Costs are incurred with respect to property included in Tax Increment District 90 -3. -16- F. Impact of Tax Increment Financing on Other Taxing Jurisdictions. The local government units other than the City which are authorized by law to levy ad valorem property taxes and in which Tax Increment District 90 -3 is located, are Independent School District No. 273, Hennepin County, the HRA, and various metropolitan area authorities, including the Metropolitan Council, the Metropolitan Transit Commission, the Metropolitan. Airports Commission and the Metropolitan Mosquito Control District (the local government units). The taxing jurisdictions encompassing Tax Increment District 90 -3 will continue to receive taxes as if the Original Tax Capacity of Tax Increment District 90 -3 were unchanged, except for the increase in Original Tax Capacity described in Part F(2) of this Plan. This precludes the jurisdictions from benefiting from a portion of the increase in Tax Capacity which results from the improvements in Tax Increment District 90 -3 described in the Program or other development of the taxable property in Tax Increment District 90 -3. In order to assess the impact of this on Hennepin County, Independent School District No. 273 and the City the following table indicates what percentage the anticipated Captured Tax Capacity of Tax Increment District 90 -3 at the completion of the improvements in Tax Increment District 90- 3.described in the Program (which occurs for taxes payable in 2000 as shown on Exhibit I hereto), is of the present total Tax Capacity for such taxing jurisdiction. If Tax Increment District 90 -3 were not created and the improvements occur in Tax Increment District 90 -3 as described in the Program, all of the Captured Tax Capacity of Tax Increment District 90 -3 would be available to the taxing jurisdictions, which would result in an increase in the tax -17- Estimated Captured Tax Capacity Percent of Present at Completion Present Taxing Tax of Total Tax Jurisdiction Capacity Improvements Capacity Hennepin County $1,034,463,652 $306,941 .03% I.S.D. No. 273 63,744,885 306,941 .48% City of Edina 77,629,266 306,941 .40% If Tax Increment District 90 -3 were not created and the improvements occur in Tax Increment District 90 -3 as described in the Program, all of the Captured Tax Capacity of Tax Increment District 90 -3 would be available to the taxing jurisdictions, which would result in an increase in the tax -17- capacity of such taxing jurisdictions in each year during the duration of Tax Increment District 90 -3 in an amount equal to the Captured Tax Capacity. VI. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROGRAM AMENDMENT AND PLANS The Program and the Plans shall be implemented on behalf of the City by the City Council and the HRA as administrator of the Program. The City shall sell and issue Tax Increment Bonds in the amounts needed�to finance the Capital and Administrative Costs, less any portion thereof to be paid directly from Tax Increment and shall use so much of the proceeds of the Tax Increment Bonds available and Tax Increment derived from the Districts to pay such Capital and Administrative Costs as is necessary. VII. AMENDMENTS TO PROGRAM AND PLANS The City reserves the right to amend the Program and the Plans, subject to the provisions of state law regulating such action. The City specifically reserves the right to enlarge the geographic area included in any District, to increase the Capital and Administrative Costs and the principal amount of Tax Increment Bonds to be issued to finance such Capital and Administrative Costs, by following the procedures specified in Section 469.175, Subdivision 4, if and when it is determined to be necessary for the payment of additional Capital and Administrative Costs. This Program and T -ax Increment Financing Plans were adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota on the 2nd day of April, 1990. . Mayor City Manager -18- EXHIBIT B 44TH AND FRANCE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN I. INVENTORY The 44th and France area is a neighborhood scale Commercial District. The area developed as "Downtown Morningside" in the 1930's at the intersection of the France Avenue and 44th Street street car lines. Although some infill development and redevelopment have occurred, the area has maintained its original flavor. The 44th and France Redevelopment Plan area is illustrated on Figure 1. The area is generally bounded by 44th Street on the north, France Avenue on the east, 46th Street on the south and, Eton Avenue extended on the west. Functionally, the commercial district includes similar areas adjacent to France Avenue in Minneapolis. This plan,-however, does not include any property within the City of Minneapolis. A. LAND USE, ZONING The Redevelopment Plan Area contains a variety of residential and non - residential land uses. There are no vacant parcels within the Plan area. Figure 2 lists all parcels within the Plan Area and describes the present land use for each parcel. 1 i Morningside Rd. _ of WI ❑ `o,� d0 �❑ a CITY OF EDINA PROJECT AREA PLANS 44TH AND FRANCE AVE. Hoisingron Group Inc 0 100 200 Soo• Project Area and Tax Increment Financing District Boundaries I 46th Figure 1 PLAN AREA Mill Tr= Mornin side Rd. Eli r* El l o �� —° '0 1 P y CITY OF EDINA PROJECT AREA PLANS 44TH AND FRANCE AVE. Hoisington Group Inc. 0 100 200 300 Existing Occupancy 1. Durr Ltd.(Furniture) 2. House (Vac) 3. House 4. House 5. House 6. House 7. Dental Office,Elves Mkting. 8. Warehouse 9. Senior Daycare 10. Linhoff Photo 11. Sports Collection/North Star Services 12. Laser Ware Health Foods Hmong Folk Art Bruegger's Bagel Bakery 13. Hardware 14. Convention Grill 15. Realty Office 16. Doctor's Office 17. Dental Of lice 18. Sheridan's Interiors 19. House 20. House 21. Edina Cleaners (2 Buildings) 22. Rapid Oil 23. Garage 24. Office 25. Office 26. House 27. House 28. House I _ P = Parking Areas Utilities Storm Sewer 46th — �'— Sanitary Sewer Water i• - " — " "- Overhead Power Lines iown", Project Area 5FX-X--A Average Daily Trafflc1987 (ADT) Figure 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS The Redevelopment Plan Area is anchored by the retail uses on. France Avenue. Non - residential building's along West 44th Street and Sunnyside Road are primarily office uses. B. NATURAL FEATURES The character of the Plan Area is that of an urban, neighborhood scale retail district. All of the parcels have been developed, and as such, there are no unaltered areas remaining. However, portions of certain developed parcels contain steep slopes and low areas which provide ponding areas and open space. C UTILITIES Some properties within the Plan Area receive water from Minneapolis. Electric utilities are above ground throughout the Plan Area. D. PARKING - CIRCULATION - TRAFFIC France Avenue, a County Road, is designated as a minor arterial roadway and carries approximately 13,000 vehicles trips per day. West 44th Street is a collector Street and carries about 5,000 vehicle trips per day. Sunnyside Road is a local street. France Avenue was reconstructed in 1989. Parking for office and retail uses is provided in private parking lots and public on- street parking. There are no parking structures or off - street publicly owned parking lots in the Plan Area. The amount of off street parking in the area does not comply with current zoning requirements for off - street 2 parking. Although there does not appear to be a shortage of parking, convenient parking is lacking for many businesses in the central part of the Plan Area. E. EXISTING PLANS The City of Edina's Comprehensive Plan, originally adopted in 1981, contains the following policies relating to northeast Edina and 44th and France in particular: * Maintain and encourage neighborhood retail commercial nodes at Valley View - Wooddale and 44th and France. * Encourage the intensification of existing commercial uses at 44th and France provided that suitable parking provisions can be accommodated. * Discourage extensions of Commercial uses along France Avenue, Sunnyside Road and 44th Street. * Encourage the redevelopment of obsolete or vacant commercial properties and service stations on the periphery of 44th and France for multiple residential housing. II. PROBLEM ASSESSMENT 3 A. BUILDING CONDITION. Most buildings in the Redevelopment Plan Area were constructed in the 1930's and 1940's. Although most buildings remain structurally sound, a significant percentage suffer from structural and life- safety code problems requiring substantial renovation or complete redevelopment. OEhers require lesser investments or cosmetic improvements to ensure their continued viability. Building condition is included in Figure 3, Analysis of Existing Conditions. B. LAND USE RELATIONSHIPS Much of the charm of 44th and France is its eclectic and somewhat haphazard development pattern. However, this development pattern has created some problems. First, the commercial area is not clearly defined. This has resulted in the conversion of some single family homes to non - residential uses. It has also resulted in disinvestment in single family homes because they are isolated from other single family homes and relate only to non - residential uses. The lack of a clear definition of the retail center and the lack of transitional buffers is a blighting influence on single family homes nearby. The Edina Cleaners is located at the corner of France Avenue and Sunnyside Road, near the center of the retail district. In addition to its original structure the cleaners occupies what was originally the Westgate Theatre. In addition to its retail function Edina Cleaners operates a large -scale dry cleaning plant. This industrial use is inappropriate in a neighborhood scale retail center. 4 I Morningside Rd. a 13 ❑ n❑J❑! 0 119 a, F ❑ I i ❑ n F I i Id ;_--p T.— CITY OF EDINA PROJECT AREA PLANS 44TH AND FRANCE AVE. Hoisingcon Group Inc. 0 X00 Zo — T 1 o / — Parking Deficiency ,I (Low Building To Land Ratio Some Substandard Housing — Commercial On Street Parking 7�-Unsightly Power Lines // Nice Building Facade; Preserve Image Parking Deficiency — Key Intersection Need To Architecturally Link Two Sides Of Street And Create a Retail District Focus Alley; Poor Site Lines Substandard Buildings (2) — Parking Deficiency J Steep Slopes J . Inappropriate Land Use (Garage) Substandard Structure Substandard House Modest; Well Maintained Homes 1 I 46th Legend: T i _ S.F. Single Family M.F. Multi Family O Office R Retail I Industrial Figure 3 ANALYSIS Parcels south of the Edina Cleaners contain inappropriate and obsolete land uses. The building conditions range from substandard to fairly good. Two single family homes, one used for office space, are substandard and should be razed. The uses do not relate well to each other or to other nearby residential areas. The central portion of the business district is served by a relatively large surface parking 'area accessed from several curb cuts along Sunnyside Road. The shared parking area is owned by a number of property owners, primarily those. fronting on Sunnyside Road. Poor access, grade differentials, and no organization of the spaces and drive aisles makes this very inefficient parking. The central portion of the district contains a variety of retail and office use which are compatible. However, the offices uses along 44th Street do have a adverse effect on residential properties on the north side of 44th Street. This has resulted in a lack of maintenance and reinvestment resulting in substandard buildings. III. REDEVELOPMENT PLAN (Figure 4 - Redevelopment Plan; Figure 5 - Public Improvements Plan) A. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES Revitalize and concentrate the focus of the 44th and France retail area without disturbing the historical character or function of the area. 5 Rd. a! .1 0o a Low To I adium Density Retail �amiiy Housing �1 St• 1 AAtt• Re I Q 1 CITY OF EDINA PROJECT AREA PLANS 44TH AND FRANCE AVE. Hoisington Group Inc. 0 100 zoo 300 I 1 1 I 1 LL I 1 1 i 46th ilI ..o... Project Area Figure 4 REDEVELOPMENT PLAN I Morningside Rd. L J ❑ 113 ❑ a Low To Medium Density Multi- Family Housing 0 0. 0 I U CITY OF EDINA PROJECT AREA PLANS i= i� 0 i I I j l i Retail j Street Improvements i Undergrounding of ' Electric Utilities i j Parking Lot Improvements Entry Feature I 45th 1 Retail 1 ® i i I ' Landscaping 44TH AND FRANCE AVE. Hoisington Group Inc 0 100 200 .3oo i i i i i i 1 46th ....... Project Area Figure 5 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS PLAN Emphasize the historical roots of old Morningside Town Center. Encourage participation by all groups or agencies affected by the Redevelopment Plan, including, but not limited to property' owners, tenants, City of Minneapolis, and the Edina City Council. Improve the transition from the Commercial area to the surrounding single family neighborhood through buffering techniques and by the redevelopment of inappropriate and incompatible uses. Implement Design guidelines to address appropriate building design, scale, materials, signage and street scape landscaping for the area. Intensify the retail mass to improve the drawing power and ensure the continued viability of the area as a neighborhood scale retail district. Redevelopment projects should reflect the historical character of Morningside Town Center. Encourage and assist private redevelopment consistent with the Redevelopment Plan which would not otherwise happen through: * Land Acquisition * Demolition /Clearance * Site Assembly * Land Write Downs * Interest Assistance C. * Relocation * Public Improvements Reduce conflicts between pedestrians and vehicles. B. REDEVEI,OPMEIgT PROJECTS The Redevelopment Plan Project encompasses both public and private property. Elements of individual projects are outlined below. 1. Public Improvements It is the intent of this project to correct problems with public streets sidewalks and other public and private utility systems throughout the Redevelopment Plan Area. The public improvements project includes the following activities: * Property Acquisition to provide public parking in the central portion of the Plan Area. * Placing existing overhead utilities underground. * Reconstruction of existing parking areas. * Public Street improvements. * Pedestrian /sidewalk improvements. * Landscaping - streetscape improvements. * Providing identification of the Morningside Town Center 7 In addition to the public improvements throughout the Plan Area, the Redevelopment Plan illustrates several other redevelopment projects. In order to achieve the goals and objectives of the Redevelopment Plan the Housing and Redevelopment Authority expects to participate in the redevelopment activities. Public activities which may be included in each project may include: * Property Acquisition. * Clearance and'site assembly and site preparation. * Relocation. * Land sales to private redevelopers. * Vacation of public rights of way. * Land write down * Interest Assistance 2. Residential Redevelopment The redevelopment project area is located north of 44th Street and west of France Avenue. The project includes what is presently four single family homes. The property faces office buildings and surface parking lots on the south side of 44th street. This land use conflict, the current underutilization of land, and the substandard condition of some of the buildings, and the fact that 44th Street is a collector street suggest multi - family as a more appropriate use of the property. The Redevelopment Plan illustrates redevelopment of the properties with low to medium density residential development. The redevelopment site could support between 10 and 16 dwelling units. L 3. gxpansion of Existing Businesses The Redevelopment Plan anticipates expansion potential for businesses in several areas. The first area is at the northwest corner of France Avenue and West 44th Street. The project would accommodate a small expansion of the existing antique /furniture store and provide additional off - street parking. The second area of expansion would be for the first two buildings south of the intersection of 44th Street -on France Avenue. The third area includes the four small office buildings on Sunnyside Road. The expansion may involve the renovation and.. expansion of individual buildings or it may include the redevelopment of some or all properties. Although public involvement may be required it is expected that most activities will be privately facilitated. 4. Retail Redevelopment The redevelopment includes what is presently the complex of buildings used by Edina Cleaners, a automotive service center, and a vehicle storage garage. The redevelopment also includes two residential properties immediately west of the Edina cleaners site fronting on Sunnyside Road. The Redevelopment Plan illustrates 15,000 to 20,000 square feet of retail space and off- street parking. The redevelopment will be the focus of Morningside Town Center. It is expected that the redeveloped retail center will mimic the existing retail development north of Sunnyside, preserving the store front character of the area. 5. Office Redevelopment E I The redevelopment project includes three single family homes in the southerly portion of the Plan Area The project could be expanded by adding the two most southerly parcels in the Plan Area. Two of the homes have converted to office use and three remain single family residences. The Redevelopment Plan anticipates a redevelopment of all five parcels, with an office building containing 6,000 to 8,000 square feet of floor area. 10 18A —Edina Su fed., March 14, 1990 5 reach 100 Remember the sinking of the Titanic in 1912? Most don't, but five residents of Edina's Rem - brandt Retirement Community remember well. Signe Haugen crossed the Atlantic from her native Nor- way in 1907 at the age of 19. "I recall my own experiences aboard ship,. when I heard the Titanic had sunk," Haugen said. Haugen was born Feb. 17, 1888. She and four other Rem - brandt residents were all born within a year or two of each other in the late 1800s: Lillian Mueller, Feb. 1, 1888; William Kirk, March 22,1889; Josephine Erickson, Aug. 23, 1889; and Marian Bussey, March 10, 1890. Lillian Mueller has been a resident at Rembrandt since 1975. The Rembrandt residents celebrated their 100th birthdays with friends, sharing memories and a special birthday cake March 9. "There would be more candles than cake if they put them all on," Kirk said. Kirk will celebrate his 101st birthday on March 22. The following students from Edina have been recognized for academic achievement at their respective colleges and univer- sities: Kathleen Hayden, Col- lege of St. Catherine; Vicki Iversen, Kristina Kalich, University of Wisconsin -River Falls; Jonathan Fisher, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. Dan Doheny, Edina, has received his master of arts degree from the University of Minnesota. Daniel Getsch, Edina, was an- nounced as a member of the 1989 -90 Cathedral Choir at Luther College. Jason Elliott and Debra Schulze, Edina, graduated from Winona State .University after fall quarter-. - Peter Nelson, Edina, received a Northern Bank Scholarship at Luther College for the 1989 -90 academic year. Sandra Kim, Edina, has been named a finalist in the National Merit Scholarship Competition. Kim, a senior at Breck School, was one of 11 students, or 10 per- cent of the graduating class, named as a finalist. The following students from Edina graduated from Mankato State University: Peter Cole, Richard Esensten, Ardelle Hansen, Katherine Reichow. of Edina (Official Publication) CITY OF EDINA 4801 W. 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 5.5424 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON AMENDMENTS TO THE SoTH AND FRANCE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN OF TILE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Edina will hold a public hearing on Amendments to the 50th and France Redevelopment Plan (the Redevelopment Plan) of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota (the HRA) at 7:00 P.M. on Mon. day, March 2s, 1990, at the Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota. The Amendments to the Redevelopment Plan authorizes additional Public improvements to be constructed and provides for additional proper - ty to be included in the area subject to the Redevelopment Plan (the Redevelopment Area). The additional property to be included in the Redevelopment Area is the property included in the area subject to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan of the HRA, and is located in the extreme southeast portion of the City (the Additional Property). The Amendments to the Redevelopment Plan authorize the use of tax in- crements derived from the tax increment financ- ing district of the HRA established by the Redevelopment Plan (the District) to provide for the payment by the HRA or the City of the costs of the additional public improvements authorized by the Amendment and the costs of certain public redevelopment costs previous)y incurred and to be incurred in connection with the redevelopment to the Additional Property pursuant to the Southeast Edina Redevelopment Plan and the financing of such costs by the HRA, and the City of Edina. The costs to be paid for with tax incre- ment may be paid either directly from the tax in. crements or may be paid with proceeds of bonds or other obligations issued by the HRA or City the principal of and interest on which is yable from tax increment derived from the District. The kmendments to the Redevelopment Plan do not nclude the Additional Property in the District. Accompany this notice is a map of a rtion if the City of dina. The area includedn the District is labelled'B" on the map, and the areas in the City in which tax increment from the District may be expended following adoption of Lhe proposed amendment are the areas labelled B" and "C" All who wish to be heard as to the Amendments o the Redevelopment Plan will be given an op- lortunity to express their views at the time of the wblic hearing or may file written comments with he City Clerk prior to the public hearing 3Y ORDER OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL. AARCELLA M. DAEHN }ty Clerk (March 14,1990)-ED City of Edina (Official Publication) CITY OF EDINA 4901 W. 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA smu NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON DESIGNATION OF DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AND APPROVAL OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLANS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Edina will hold a public hearing on the proposed designation by the City Council of Development District No. 2 (the Development District) and on the adoption of a Development Program for the Development District (the Development Program), pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 465.12A and 469.L34, and on the proposed approval by the City Coun- cil of Tax Increment Financing Plans (the Financing Plans) which create three Tax Incre- ment Financing Districts (the Tax increment Districts) in the City. The public hearing will be held at 7:00 p.m. on Monday. April 2, 1990, at the Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina. Minnesota. Three separate areas are to be included in the Development District. These areas are located at West 44th Street and France Avenue, Valleyview Road and Wonddale Avenue and West 70th Street and Cahill Road. The Development Program describes the objectives of the City in connection with the development of the property in the Development District and certain activities pro- posed to be undertaken by the City to accomplish such objectives. Each of the three areas to be included within the Development District will be included in a separate Tax Increment District pursuant to the Financing Plans. Under the Financing Plans, tax increments derived from the Tax Increment Districts would be used for the ppaeyment of costs of the City of car- rying out the Development Program or for the payment of debt service on bonds or other obliga- tions to be issued by the City for payment of such costs. it is proposed that all tax revenues from the Tax Increment Districts resulting from in- creases in the tax capacity of taxable real prop- erty therein be segregated and applied to pay- ment of costs of the Ci:. in carrying out the Development Program. Accompanying this notice is a map of a portion of the City. The areas to be included in the Development District and in the Tax Increment Districts are labelled "A" on the map. All who wish to be heard as to the designation of the Development District and on the approval of the Financing Plans will be given an �pom ty to express their views at the time of the public heaarinnlg or pmay file writttuen comments with the bb h City BY ORDER OF THEIEI INA CITY COUNCIL. MARCELLA M. DAEHN City Clerk (March 14,1990)-ED u-ban )ying 'a irly oper- es of ) the )mis- an to e 15 Fred icing iden- vn to )mes kay 1 je in s of (pay nore are ser- iree- tro axes ser- ( as are i go Late heir vide can aid. I not rate •ould Lure. cur- 's a )ge 4 bees ;uucation materials in pools putting kids to sleep? grader, knows. She had to sit Sound great? It should. Ad- through instruction. ministrators and teachers say ad of "Well, they never told us it's what Edina parents want in Why anything that we already didn't sex education. ILA - V%^wIUR :3 CIO `o City examines TIF to beat deadline By Cindy Eggert Dr. Frank Sidell has owned a clinical practice at the corner of Wooddale Avenue and Valley View Road for 30 years — before the area was even a part of Edina. Sidell is one of several business owners who saw at a recent City Council meeting plans to redevelop three business areas: 44th and France avenues; Cahill Road and 70th Street; and Valley View Road and Wooddale Avenue. The Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority ( the City Council) is considering establishing tax increment financing (TIF) districts in those areas before March 30. The action is required, council members said at the March 19 meeting, because the Legislature is considering two bills that could restrict the city's ability to establish TIF districts in the future. And that could ultimately hamper the city's ability to spur redevelopment of older or blighted areas. At first blush, however, retail owners were less than en- thusiastic in their response to the city's plans. "The plan, as presented. would devalue my property," Sidell said. "(The plans) don't do us anything but detriment." His comments were in reac- tion to a design concept for an area along Valley View Road from Best Reflections Hair Styl- ing at Oaklawn Avenue to Valley View Center west of Wooddale Avenue. Designed by consultants from the Hoisington Group and city staff, plans reflect the following goals: increase the amount of off - street parking; correct park- ing and circulation problems: improve access and traffic flow: and create a better transition between commercial and residential areas.. In the 44th and France area. the consultant said the aim is to preserve and enhance the area's "downtown Morningside" at- mosphere. Other improvements would be to: buffer single family homes from commercial uses; intensify the area's retail com- ponent to draw more con- sumers; and implement guidelines to address building design, scale and materials. "If you remove the building TIF: To next pare 70th and Cahill slated for housing project By Cindy Eggert School and church bells have long been silent on the corner of 70th Street and Cahill Road. The church building was once site of the first Irish settlement in the city, St. Patrick's Church. And in the '50s, an elementary school was built and served Edina Public Schools until declining enrollment of the late '70s forced its sale. Now both properties are the subject of a controversial development issue which came before the Edina City Council March 19. Edina developer Ron Clark wants to build 13 single family homes on what is con- sidered the "school" property 4nd 21 townhomes on what is how the school parking lot and former church property. Residents surrounding the area had mixed reaction to the proposal. Some said the types of housing on the site are ap- propriate. Others decried the density of the project, par- ticularly the townhomes, and their proximity to homes on the north side of West 70th Street. The City Council last week gave the proposal preliminary approval, subject to several con- ditions to be resolved before a second vote set April 2. "Residents invested in their property because they thought there would be an Edina elementary school across the street," said homeowner Stephen Smithson, 5608 W. 70th St. "Now they're faced with en- croaching higher density units which lessen the desirability and value of our homes.'' F'owever, others at the meeting spoke in favor of the development. "We have the best of both worlds in this proposal," said Darlene McDonnel, a resi- dent of another Clark develop- ment just south of the property in question. CAHILL: To next page �A —Edina Sun - Current —Wed.. March 28. 1990 TIF From previous page and come up with a mall-type development, you'll change the whole structure of 44th and France," said Jim VanValken- burg, an attorney representing owners of Edina Cleaners and a past mayor. Specifically, he addressed plans that would reconfigure parking in the area, limiting most on -street parking and shif- ting much of it to common lots behind the retail shops. "If you take away our parking you're taking us out of business," VanValkenburg said of the cleaners. In the Cahill shopping area, there are two design alter- natives which have the same goals: update the area's design and retail needs; improve tran- sitions from commercial and residential; and create oppor- tunities for new businesses to locate there. Though initial reaction to the proposals seemed lukewarm, ci ty officials emphasized the plans were not cast in stone and were primarily offered to foster discussion of TIF districts. "Nothing is being proposed to undertake a project or redevelopment process," said Mayor Fred Richards. "What we're doing here is to make sure that this council, whether that is one of these elected officials or one in the future, will have the tools to begin the process if that is what is needed. "We see the window is closing. For whatever reason, the Legislature may restrict cities' ability to use tax increment financing," Richards said. "What I think staff is saying is that if we don't do. this, we are precluding ourselves from using a tool that could be of help redeveloping in the future." Bills in Legislature could change TIF laws The Senate Tax Committee Friday passed one of two TIF bills in the _I egislatuce that could restrict; cities' ability to use the redevelopment tool in the future. Critics of current TIF laws say cities have used the pro- cess for projects that_ night have occurred without public assistance. For instance, legislators point to a case involving the ci- ty of Minneapolis in which they feel TIF funds were used inappropriately. Minneapolis gave $3 million of TIF funds to a developer to keep the height of a proposed building near Lake Calhoun below a certain height. Another snag in current TIF laws, according to critics, is that other local forms of government, such as the coun- ty or schools, are deprived of increases in local tax revenue. Taxes generated from a TIF district are divied up in two ways. The amount'that was generated before redevelop- ment occurred continues to go into local, county and state cof- fers. However, "excess" taxes — generated by the more valuable, redeveloped proper- ty — go to pay off bond debts. Once bonds are paid off, the taxes revert to all local govern- ments. The benefit of TIF, city officials say, is that once a bond debt is retired, the local governments realize greater revenue that might not have occurred without public assistance. But school and county associations say waiting 10-25 years for that increase in fun- ding is unfair. Minnesota Suburban Publications reserves the right to decline advertisements that are in violation of the law, untrue, misleading or deceptive. Minnesota Suburban Publications cannot assume responsibility for the licensing of all advertisers and, therefore, urges consumers to check with local licensing departments to assure that businesses possess the appropriate license to operate a business or work in a specific community. on This blighted building brings the city $25,000 in taxes annually. A development firm wants to construct a building on this site that could bring the city $125,000 in taxes annually. Tax increment financing (TIF) is a tool cities have historically used to encourage development or redevelop- ment of blighted or run -down areas. Often TIF is used when a parcel, for whatever reasons, is too costly to be considered for private development. For instance, developers might not consider developing a site composed of several small parcels of privately own- The city sells bonds to pay for clearing the old building off the land. ed land. But a city could create a TIF district, purchase the sections and in turn, sell the single property to a developer. To finance these actions, cities sell TIF bonds. They then use the money to pur- chase land and sometimes raze delapidated buildings to offer property in a "develop- ment ready" state. Cities also use money from bond sales to pay for public im- The it taxes by the ing - IS USE the bl provem and seN To pe will "c: the TI general its valt with re Once tire tax "excel: is retw rolls. Cahill: Development `includf family homes and 21 town] From previous page "The density has been scaled back, and (residents on the north side of West 70th) aren't going to see anything more than if there were single family homes. I'm for it and I think another developer could propose something far worse," McDon- nel said. After initial review by the Planning and Zoning Board, Clark decreased the number of townhouses from 25 to 21 on 4.2 acres, making a density of 5 units per acre. The 13 single Family homes are on about 8.6 acres, or about 1.5 units per acre. Though the proposal was scal- ed back, some residents con- tinued to oppose the project, particularly the density of the townhomes. "I'm restoring one of the oldest homes in Edina and I live in this area. I've spoken to many people in the neighborhood and the people I've talked to are 100 percent opposed," said Ted Steen, 5524 W. 70th St. He later submitted letters from more than 100 residents stating their objections. Residents also objected to the level of traffic they expect the project to generate. And they questioned the site's historical designation and whether or not the former church building was protected by that designation. "I think the Heritage Preser- vation Board has said the building itself has no historical significance, although the foun- dation and site may," said Coun- cil Member Jane Paulus. "For WALKAWAY ]Fansick.., r , Cahill: Development-Inel-ades single family homes and 21 townhomes From previous page "The density has been scaled back, and (residents on the north side of West 70th) aren't going to see anything more than if. there were single family homes. I'm for it and I think another developer could propose something far worse," McDon- nel said. After initial review by the Planning and Zoning Board, Clark decreased the number of townhouses from 25 to 21 on 4.2 acres, making a density of 5 units per acre. The 13 single family homes are on about 8.6 acres, or about 1.5 units per acre. Though the proposal was scal- ed back, some residents con- ; tinued to oppose the project, �-particularly the density of the townhomes. "I'm restoring one of the -oldest homes in Edina and I live in this area. I've spoken to many people in the neighborhood and the people I've talked to are 100 percent opposed," said Ted Steen, 5524 W. 70th St. He later submitted letters from more than 100 residents stating their objections. Residents also objected to the level of traffic they expect the project to generate. And they questioned the site's historical designation and whether or not the former church building was protected by that designation. "I think the Heritage Preser- vation Board has said the building itself has no historical significance, although the foun- dation and site may," said Coun- cil Member Jane Paulus. "For WALKAWAY FROM y FOOT PROBLEMS-,,, Are Corns and Callouses Slowing You Down? Well, no need to suffer any longer. Corns and callouses are often caused from small bumps or spurs on the underlying bone. An in- office surgical procedure can often eliminate these common foot problems permanently. The patient is able to walk out of the office (Foot Clinic) with no cast and no hospital stay is necessary. common Foot Probf+er»� Treaed #n Qur Office �r�slutfe, � .� •Corns & Callouses � • Pamful�Heels �' �• �ienl+loat Nai15C:ure��� •Bunaons: •:Warts E_� •Ing�o�vxtNa't�'s'� Office Hours br Appointment FOOT CL IC ASSOCIATED PODIATRISTS e� Dr. Christopher Weis Q ��o� 6344 Penn Ave. So. L Richfield, MN 55423 me, this area lost its historical significance years ago when the shops and farms gave way to development. And if we do something to commemorate the Irish settlement in Edina, it should include the whole Cahill prea." Council members supported the development for several reasons including: the number of Oew single family homes it will generate; a decrease in traffic, according to projections (mainly because the Montessori school will be gone) ; and the low density of the townhomes (as defined in the city's Comprehen- sive Plan). "Density is a very important issue to me," said Mayor Fred Richards. "I think the density issue has been properly address- ed. The Comprehensive Plan shows a higher density could be put here, but the developer isn't asking for that." Council Member Glenn Smith, who lives in the neighborhood, echoed comments about less traffic being generated by the housing development. "I understand traffic con- cerns, but I understand there will be substantially less traffic in the neighborhood if this pro- ject goes in." Smith also said the townhouses serve as a good, albeit frustrating, buffer bet- ween high density housing south on Cahill and homeowners on West 70th Street. The developer must address the following issues prior to the council vote April 2: • Recognize settlers of western Edina, whether at the project site or elsewhere in the community. • Review and increase if necessary guest parking in the townhomes (now at 11 spaces). • Review emergency vehicle access. • Review a bottleneck lot in the single family portion. 1y J REPORURECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # IV. B. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE # — Consent ❑ City Engineer Information Only ❑ Date: August 3, 2004 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: Continuation of Municipal To Council Action ® Motion State Aid Sidewalk - 4809 Resolution to 4709 West 70th Street, Improvement No. S -074. El Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: If the Council determines the project to be warranted and necessary, Council shall adopt a resolution approving West 70th Street Sidewalk 'Improvement, Improvement No. S -074, authorize plans and specifications to be completed and bids taken. Info /Background: This project was continued from the July 20, 2004 City Council Meeting. Additional information was requested regarding the location of the sidewalk and the location of the mailboxes. Attached you will find a copy of the July 20, 2004 staff report and feasibility study. Staff recommends that a boulevard style sidewalk be placed throughout this project with the exception of the furthest westerly property due to lack of right -of -way. A boulevard style sidewalk does exist along both the north and south sides of West 70th Street from TH100 to Sandell. Avenue (one block west of France Avenue). A curb -style sidewalk does exist between Sandell Avenue and France Avenue due to the lack of right -of -way and space within this commercial area. The existing sidewalk east of Cornelia Drive does meander to avoid trees; some of these areas do become a curb -style sidewalk to avoid the trees. Staff will be replacing portions of the sidewalk where trees have been removed or where settlement has occurred. Staff is responsible for over 25 miles of sidewalks and walking paths. A temporary repair for settlement areas does include placing bituminous pavement in the settled area until that portion of the sidewalk can be replaced. A boulevard style sidewalk will not create a smaller front yard for three of the four residences compared to the majority of residences along West 70th Street, see attached photos. Y� Staff typically designs sidewalks using State and Federal standards. The federal register for American with Disabilities Act (ADA) Accessibility Guidelines for Buildings and Facilities is silent on placing a sidewalk against a raised curb such as what exists along West 70`h Street. However, the Accessibility Guideline overview states that: "Efforts should be made in the design of walks to prevent wheelchair wheels from rolling off the walk and dropping to the level of grade. In this case many wheelchairs will overturn and users are at risk of injury. " If a curb -style sidewalk is chosen staff recommends that a two -foot exposed aggregate concrete strip be placed between the curb and sidewalk. This strip will provide ample room to maintain the mailboxes at the curb while also providing a change in surface to accommodate the ADA issue, wheel chairs, and sight challenged pedestrians. Staff continues to recommend the construction of this sidewalk, which will provide sidewalks along both sides of West 701h Street. West 70th Street currently has 18,000 vehicles per day (vpd) with an additional 1000 vpd expected by 2020. Although the City has not adopted criteria for placement of sidewalks along both sides of higher functional roadways, the Guidelines for Installing Sidewalks as published by Institute of Transportation Engineers recommends placing sidewalks along both sides of the roadway for Residential (Major Arterials); West 70th Street is classified as a "B" Minor Arterial. Staff is revising our proposal to include a boulevard style sidewalk along the entire frontage of Arneson Acres Park. This will involve the additional removal of trees and brush from the area on the westerly side of Arneson Acres Park. This area will be revegetated, to provide a screening of the Arneson Acres green house. Staff has contacted John Lynch of the Normandale Branch 'of the US Postal Service regarding placement of curbside mailboxes. Even though the City of Edina has many areas where mailboxes are placed behind a curb -style sidewalk, see attached photos. The US Postal regulations require that a mailbox be placed to allow safe and convenient delivery by carriers without leaving their vehicles. The first reply from Mr. Lynch states that if "a carrier drives on the sidewalk (it) would not be considered safe and convenient ", see attached facsimile. Mr. Lynch also stated in a phone conversation that typically their carriers do deliver to these types of mailboxes. Staff also feels that any vehicle that drives on a sidewalk presents an unsafe condition for pedestrians, see attached photos. Staff has reviewed the project and feels that the project is feasible from an engineering and safety standpoint. REPORT /RECOMMENDATION TO: Mayor & City Council From: Wayne D. Houle, PE — City Engineer Date: July 20, 2004 Subject: Municipal State Aid Sidewalk — 4809 to 4709 West 70th Street, Improvement No. S -074. Recommendation: Agenda Item # V. E. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ® Motion ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance Discussion If the Council determines the project to be warranted and necessary, Council shall adopt a resolution approving West 70th Street Sidewalk Improvement, Improvement No. S -074, authorize plans and specifications to be completed and bids taken. Info /Background: This project was initiated by the City Council through the 2003 / 2004 Municipal State Aid Sidewalk Study and also through the 2004 -2008 Capital Improvement Program (entrance improvement at Arneson Acres Park). Attached you will find the Feasibility Study. Staff recently informed the residents of the proposed project. Some of the affected property owners indicated concern with the proposed sidewalk, see attached letter. The westerly property owner is in favor of the sidewalk due to a physical disability that has confined her to a wheel chair. The pedestrian travel shed for this missing sidewalk segment could potentially include the neighborhood to the south that includes Larkspur Lane, Aspasia Lane, Trillium Lane and Hibiscus Avenue to name a few. The total estimated project cost is $113,000. Funding for this project would be from Municipal State Aid System funds and revolving fund (as approved in the CIP). Staff has reviewed the project and feels that the project is feasible from an engineering and safety standpoint. FEASIBILITY STUDY S -074 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDINA SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS West 70th Street from TH 100 to West Shore Drive July 7, 2004 LOCATION: West 70th Street from TH 100 frontage road to West Shore Drive (see Figure 1). FIGURE 1. Location Map — West 70"' Street Sidewalk Improvement INITIATION & ISSUES: The West 70th Street sidewalk improvement project from the TH 100 frontage road to West Shore Drive was initiated by City staff to analyze the feasibility of completing a missing segment of sidewalk along West 70th Street that is part of the Municipal State Aid (MSA) Sidewalk System identified in the City of Edina Transportation Plan (1999). Additionally, staff presented a Municipal State Aid Sidewalk Study to the City Council on March 4, 2003 and again on February 3, 2004 that identified this missing segment of sidewalk along West 70th Street. _ -_ -�— Hsi t ,f 1 t -- wo \ /'`��PROJECT `j nooN -V' �- LLOCATION - J s 1�- �0 JTT -- 1 1 Arnsson Acres Park L N L. �� _. •! .......... 0 100 200 400 fi00 B00 _ FIGURE 1. Location Map — West 70"' Street Sidewalk Improvement INITIATION & ISSUES: The West 70th Street sidewalk improvement project from the TH 100 frontage road to West Shore Drive was initiated by City staff to analyze the feasibility of completing a missing segment of sidewalk along West 70th Street that is part of the Municipal State Aid (MSA) Sidewalk System identified in the City of Edina Transportation Plan (1999). Additionally, staff presented a Municipal State Aid Sidewalk Study to the City Council on March 4, 2003 and again on February 3, 2004 that identified this missing segment of sidewalk along West 70th Street. Feasibility Study S074 West 701h Street Sidewalk Improvements — TH 100 to West Shore Drive July 7, 2004 Page 2 The following are existing features identified by staff that present issues in determining the feasibility of the project and are addressed in this report: • Existing trees. • Existing landscaping. • Steep existing boulevard slopes. • Existing underground utility lines and light poles. The proposed sidewalk segment will provide access for pedestrians traversing the south side of West 70th Street. This will also comply with the current Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accessibility guidelines and provide access to Arneson Acres Park for pedestrians from both east and west of the park. EXISTING CONDITIONS: West 70th Street is part of the City's designated Municipal State Aid Roadway System (MSA). West 70th Street consists of a 40 foot wide roadway with concrete curb and gutter along both sides of the street. The original bituminous street was constructed in 1955 and reconstructed and upgraded with concrete pavement in 1961. An existing sidewalk is located along the north side of West 70th Street and along the south side to approximately 250 feet west of West Shore Drive up to the east edge of Arneson Acres Park where the walk terminates. The posted speed limit on West 701h Street is 30 mph. The south boulevard between the frontage road and Arneson Acres Park abuts four residential properties. The boulevards in these locations consist of fairly level slopes with numerous trees, bushes, landscaping and mailboxes (see Photo 1). PHOTO 1. West 70th Street (Looking towards TH 100) Feasibility Study S074 West 701h Street Sidewalk Improvements — TH 100 to West Shore Drive July 7, 2004 Page 3 The remainder of the project abuts City property along Arneson Acres Park. The boulevard adjacent to the park consists of steep, heavily vegetated back slopes and underground utility lines and poles (see Photo 2). PHOTO 2. West 70th Street (Looking west from West Shore Drive) IMPROVEMENT: The proposed improvements for this project include construction of a sidewalk along the south side of West 70th Street from the TH 100 frontage road (Normandale Boulevard) to 250 feet west of West Shore Drive (see Figure 2). The proposed sidewalk is required to be constructed to MSA standards. The typical sidewalk will be five -foot wide with five -foot wide boulevards. However, curb -style walk with no boulevard will be constructed at the west end of the project for 70 -feet and to the west of the Arneson Acres Park entrance to minimize easement needs, property impacts, grading impacts and tree impacts. Retaining walls will also be constructed in several locations adjacent to the proposed walk to accommodate existing, steep boulevards. Existing utility lines and light poles will be relocated by the private utility companies. In addition to the sidewalk improvements, the Arneson Acres Park driveway is proposed to be widened to provide better access into and out of the park. Feasibility Study S074 West 701h Street Sidewalk Improvements — TH 100 to West Shore Drive July 7, 2004 Page 4 FIGURE 2. PROPOSED SIDEWALK - WEST 70TH STREET RIGHT -OF -WAY & EASEMENTS: The right -of -way for West 70th Street is typically 73 feet wide. A sidewalk easement is required and has been acquired from the resident located at 4809 West 70"' Street to allow the construction of the walk to extend to the frontage road where the boulevard and available right -of- way width narrows. Additionally, significant grading is required along Arneson Acres Park that requires encroachment onto park property. The remainder of the sidewalk and construction impacts will be constructed within existing right -of -way. FEASIBILITY: The project is feasible, both from an Engineering standpoint and fiscally. ASSESSMENTS: The cost of this project will not be assessed. Revenue for this project is available through the funds the City receives from the State Gas Tax funds for maintenance and construction of roadways, Municipal State Aid (MSA) funds. However, MSA funding would not be applicable for the Arneson Acres Park driveway. The funding for this portion has been approved in the 2004 -2008 Capital Improvement Program. f Feasibility Study S074 West 70t`' Street Sidewalk Improvements — TH 100 to West Shore Drive July 7, 2004 Page 5 PROJECT COSTS: The total estimated project cost is $113,300 and includes indirect costs of 15% for engineering and clerical costs. See summary of the Project Cost Estimate below. TOTAL CONSTRUCITON COST: $ 98,500 15% ENGINEERING & CLERICAL: $ 14,800 RIGHT -OF- WAY /EASEMENT COSTS: $ 0 TOTAL PROJECT COST: $ 113,300 PROJECT SCHEDULE: The City Council is scheduled to receive the Feasibility Report on Tuesday, July 20, 2004. Upon Council approval, this project will be scheduled for construction in late summer of 2004. j aC/ City of Edina June 24, 2004 Anne Marie Plante, 4801 West 70"' Street, Edina, MN 55435 David and Donna Hamilton, 4805 West 70"' Street, Edina, MN 55435 Donald and Dorthy Barck, 4807 West 70th Street, Edina, MN 55435 RE: Letter dated June 19, 2004 West 70th Street Sidewalk Project Dear Residents: Thank you for your letter dated June le that refers to your letter to Mayor Maetzold regarding the above project. This project will be discussed at the July 20"', City Council Meeting. The meeting will start at 7:00 PM in the Council Chambers located at Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street. Even though this is not a public hearing staff is recommending that the Council at this meeting take testimony from the public. If you have any questions or need additional information please contact me at 952- 826 -0443 or at whouleCa-ci.edina.mn.us. Sincerely, Wayne D. Houle, PE Director of Public Works / City Engineer Enclosures C: Mayor and Council Gordon Hughes — City Manager Ronald & Ruth Johnson, 4809 West 70"' Street, Edina, MN 55435 City Hall 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952 - 826-0379 4801 West 701h Street Edina, MN 55435 June 16, 2004 Mayor Dennis Maetwld City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 Dear Mayor Maenold: As property owners on the south side of West 70'h Street, we request cancellation of the proposed extension of public sidewalks from Arneson Acres Park to Highway 100 for the following reasons: • We were neither consulted nor notified of the project prior to the written notification dated 9 June from Edma's Director of Public Works, Mr. Wayne Houle. Anne Marie Plante discussed the project with Mr. Houle by phone on June 16. In that conversation, Mr. Houle stated the project was approved in March 2003. The City Council minutes for February and March 2003 make no specific mention of this project. Mr. Houle stated that homeowners did not need to be consulted m advance since the funding source was Metro State Aid rather than local assessmem • The City of Edina has not rated this as a high - priority project. In the minutes of March 4, 2003 (see attachment), Mr. Houle stated that there were projects of "high priority" (on Tracy, Blake and Interlachen, Brookside; and Valley View). Mr. Houle also noted, "the City's adopted Sidewalk Adoption Policy requires initiation of sidewalks to be resident driven " This is certainly not true of this project. • The pedestrian traffic along West 70 does not warrant the expense of the project. The tremendous volume of poorly regulated traffic along West 70P in both directions (16,000+ vehicles on most weekdays) renders West 7e inhospitable to pedestrians and bilkers. The north side of the street already has a sidewalk fi+om France to Highway 100 that is, hardly ever used. • The project negatively impacts aesthetic quality of the street. The appropriation of more than nine feet of residential property, with attendant plowing and salt damage, will impair the owners' ability to properly maintain their front yards. The sidewalk will not have a uniform distance from the street. The setback from dwellings is much less than that of the existing sidewalk on the north side of West 70a. Construction would also entail the removal of trees and flower planters at Arneson Acres Park. This would reduce the aesthetic value of both the park and adjacent properties. Since this project has not received final approval from the Minnesota Department of Transportation, Metro State Aid, we request its cancellation. Please do not hesitate to contact any of us with your questions. S, ly. Marie Plante, 4801 Wpst 70d, Street 'Zona]dand Barck, 4807 West 7& Street Donna Hamilton, 48MWest 7e Street Attachments: (1) IN TO)CICATING and SUNDAY SALE: Big Bowl Caft, California Pizza Kitchen, Eden Avenue Grill, Maggiano's Restaurant & Bakery, P.F. Chang's Bistro, Roman's Macaroni Grill, Ruby Tuesday, Sidney's Pizza Caft, Tejas, The Cheesecake Factory and Two Guys'From Italy; CLUB ON -SALE and SUNDAY SALE: Edina Country Club and Interlachen Country Club- Member Housh seconded the motion Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold Motion carried. ON -SALE WINE AND ON -SALE 3.2 BEER LICENSE RENEWALS APPROVED Mr- Hughes presented the list of restaurants holding On -Sale Wine and On-Sale Beer Licenses recommended for approval. He noted that when licenses receiving both an on -sale Wine license and an on -sale 3.2 license may as per State Statute with no further license sell strong beer in their restaurants. Mr. Hughes reported that all necessary documentation has been submitted for. renewal, fees collected, and the Police Department recommended renewal. Member Hovland made a motion to approve issuance of ON -SALE and ON -SALE 3.2 BEER Licenses as follows: Beaujo's Bistro, Boundary Waters Restaurant, Chuck E. Cheese's, D'Amico & Sons, Edina Grill, Good Earth Restaurant, Locanda De Giorgio, Inc., Pizzeria Uno, Residence Inn Edina, Szechuan Star Restaurant, and Yorktown Cinema Grill. Member Masica seconded the motion Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold Motion carried. 3.2 BEER LICENSE RENEWALS APPROVED Mr. Hughes presented a list of applicants for renewal of their 3.2 beer licenses, both On-Sale and Off -Sale. All necessary documentation has been submitted for renewal, fees have been collected and the Police Department recommended approval Member Masica made .a motion approving issuance of beer license renewals as follows: ON -SALE 3.2 BEER LICENSES: Braemar Golf Course, Davanni's Pizza Hoagies, Fred Richards Golf Course, New Hong Kong Kitchen,. TJ's Family Restaurant, and OFF-SALE 3.2 LICENSES: Cub Foods, Holiday Stationstore #217, Jerry's Food, and Speedway SuperAmerica LLC. Member Hovland seconded the motion Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold Motion carried. REPORT PRESENTED ON STATE AID SIDWALKS Engineer Houle explained the Municipal State Aid Sidewalk Report was held over from the February 18, 2003, Council meeting due to the late hour. Council had requested staff analyze the "missing sidewalk segments" on the Municipal State Aid roadway system. He informed the Council the City currently has 32 miles of Ninmesota State Aid (MSA) and County State Aid Highway (CSAH) sidewalks. Many of the sidewalks and pathways were constructed with adjacent developments and are missing critical sidewalk segments. The Comprehensive Sidewalk / Pathway Plan was updated in 1999 as part of the City's Comprehensive Plan update. The plan includes all existing sidewalks along with proposed MSA/ CSAH sidewalks and also proposed local roadway sidewalks. Mr. Houle staffed the proposed MSA sidewalks will add approximately twelve miles of sidewalks to the existing system. Many of these segments will require extensive boulevard work to construct the sidewalk or pathway and will also transverse many residential boulevards. Mr. Houle noted missing sidewalk segments of high priority were: 1) Tracy Avenue near the Crosstown, 2) Blake Road and Interlachen Boulevaz , 3) roo cside, and 4) Valley View Road to http:// www. ci. edina. mn. us/ Pages/ CityCouncil __MeetingMinutes/20030304Reg.htin 6/15/04 MUCH Y, GVVJ L.:UU1a �.a►j w Vuaivu ..avv►u.b ..--- ---- z r�, Concord Avenue and Concord to Concord School. In order to complete all 12 miles, an additional $550,000 /year would be necessary in the State Aid budget. H tail the current Capital Improvement Plan has appropriated $130,000 per year for sidewalks, not in the City's adopted Sidewalk Adoption Policy requires initiation of sidewalks be resident driven or a state aid street were being constructed, sidewalks could be included with the Mr. Houle noted that some of the proposed sidewalks, such as Interlachen Boulevard sidewalk /pathway, might qualify for Federal funding under the Transportation Enhancement Program. He added the program was competitive and administered by the Metropolitan Council and that would possible fill the need to develop creative funding sources for sidewalk construction. Member Housh asked what process could to be followed to acquire funding through the Metropolitan Council. Mr. Houle said Met Council examines the route requested, and length of pathway and points were awarded in developing a priority list. Member Masica said she was lobbying for sidewalks for the area between TH169 and Gleason Road on Valley View because of a lot of cut- through traffic going to facilities at Braemar. She said she believed the situation will worsen when the public safety training facility and medical building were completed. Mr. Houle responded that a possible funding source for this segment may be to construct it in conjunction with the Bredeson Park project. Member Hovland indicated the City should go forward carefully noting the state's budget situation Member Housh said other than federal funds; the City should be seeking grants to complete the projects. No formal Council action was taken. RESOLUTION 'NO. 2003 -30 APPROVING SOUTH METRO PUBLIC SAFETY TRAINING FACILITY GRANT Member Masica removed Resolution No. 2003 -30 from the consent agenda for further information She inquired whether the joint Powers Agreement with the other involved cities must be amended to comply with the State's request. Mr. Hughes stated that that has already been accomplished Member Masica introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption RESOLUTION NO. 2003-30 WHEREAS, the City of Edina and the State of Minnesota propose to enter into a Grant Agreement with respect to the South Metro Public Safety Training Center, and WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota requests that the City of Edina adopt a resolution clarifying ongoing operational responsibilities for said training center. NOW THEREFORE BE TT RESOLVED that the City of Edina will assume responsibility for the operational maintenance cost of the South Metro Public Safety Training Center, which are not offset by operational revenues. Adopted this 4h day of March 2003. Member Housh seconded the motion Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold Motion carried *2003 LABOR AGREEMENT FOR LOCAL IAFF (FIRE) APPROVED Member Kelly made a motion seconded by Member Hovland proving the 2003 Labor Agreement for Local IAFF (Fire) as follows: 1. Wages 311/6 http: / /www.ci.edina.mrLus/ Pages/ CityCounciLMeetingMinutes /20030304Reg.htm 6/15/04 0 �. \r�RilanV•�V" City of Edina June 9, 2004 West W Street Residents Edina, MN Re: Resident Letter No. 1 West 7e Street Sidewalk Project Dear Resident: The Edina City council has directed City staff to complete the missing segment of sidewalks that are located on Municipal State Aid (MSA) roadways such as West 70 Street. City staff has been working on plans for the missing sidewalk along the southerly side of West 7& Street from the east property line of Arneson Acres Park to the east TH1OO frontage road. The proposed sidewalk will provide a safe east -west pedestrian movement along the south side of West 701' Street from the frontage road to West Shore Drive and beyond. The City will maintain this sidewalk; which will include all snow removal, along with any physical maintenance or liability due to the sidewalk. The majority of the sidewalk Is planned to be a boulevard style sidewalk similar to sidewalk to the east. The sidewalk is planned within the roadway right- of-way with the exception of 4809 West 7& Street where an easement will be required. We are anticipating a late summer construction. Any areas disturbed by the construction of this sidewalk will be repaired including sprinkler systems and invisible pet containment systems. I've enclosed a plan of this sidewalk for your information. Please contact me if you have any concerns regarding the sidewalk at 952- 826 -0443 or whoulellci.edina.mn.us. Sincerely, Wayne D. Houle, PE Director of Public Works / City Engineer Enclosure City Hall 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 4801 WEST 50TH STREET TTY 952 - 826-0379 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com N �a aa+TRAeTUe Mmm 1J SAVaft Cm TO REDONE AT GUTTER PP RUUM SAF-IVRR E�V�V�= DpLACE 4J CLEAR a am TREES SHM !T -x- 16 s D aSt F CURB WITH 63 V� a v LK a MAN Niel e END NEW SIDEW4N a� �— �_ _ _ F _ W 70TH ST Pin —s — #- _-- - -- REMOVE EMST. rite --+ �,_� -- SAV CUT CDC PA ' - - + -- V. 70T ST I--- PED ALL IiV CASTpRi — — 1- .. T T = _ - �x cAm�{ I _iW Ta+E v ¢� "M — q I V TALL CDC 4� 4807 I 4� RoovE vmn PLANTER I a/D D RAID ( I 4101 l l>s a QN01 REMVE PILLAR a►r i I I I I :wv a "T. cm of am 7U I i ARNESM ACRES PARK C3 lx I I I I � I N �a aa+TRAeTUe Mmm 1J SAVaft Cm TO REDONE AT GUTTER PP RUUM SAF-IVRR E�V�V�= DpLACE 4J CLEAR a am TREES SHM !T -x- 16 s D aSt F CURB WITH 63 V� a v LK a MAN Niel e PROPOSED SIDEWALK AREA TYPICAL SETBACKS FROM BACK OF SIDEWALK t 40 FEET I t 40 FEET I r' EXISTING SIDEWALK AREA West 70th Street: Proposed Sidewalk Extension - Improvement No. S074 TYPICAL SETBACKS v FROM BACK OF± SIDEWALK _ All I, - -� : '� 40 FEET . � lop 1 _ 40 FEET • .: PROPOSED SIDEWALK EXISTING SIDEWALK AREA AREA West 70th Street: Proposed Sidewalk Extension - Improvement No. S074 'IOLA .4 rte` %lie t r - TYPICAL SETBACKS FROM BACK OF SIDEWALK t 40 FEET t t 40 FEET I PROPOSED SIDEWALK EXISTING SIDEWALK AREA AREA West 70th Street: Proposed Sidewalk Extension - Improvement No. S074 Accessibility Guidelines The third type of curb ramp is a built -up ramp that is within the parking or street area and has flared sides as shown in Figure 13. The main ramped portion of the curb ramp is limited to a maximum slope of 1:12 or 1 inch rise in 12 inches of run. The flared sides of appropriate curb ramps, as in Figure 12(a) and Figure 13 presented maximum slope of 1:10. Of preferred design three b ramp options p eof the returned curb as shown in Figure 12(b) and should have planting and other non - walking surfaces alongside the curb return as shown in the drawing. It is interesting to note, the advantages found by incorporating curb ramps for those who are in wheelchairs turn into disadvan- tages for the visually impaired who use canes to signal changes in levels and to determine where the street is. This is one of the few instances where cross disabilities conflict in their benefits. Because of the concern for the visually impaired, the ADA Guidelines ( ADAAG) requires detectable warnings to desig- nate where these curb ramps are located along the "accessible route ". Truncated domes make up the detectable warning and should be incorporated into the full depth and width of the curb ramp. ' Walks should be between four and five feet wide, but are actually required to be no less than three feet wide. They should be constructed of a smooth hard material and their surface should be slip resistant. The accessible route should not include sidewalks that are loose gravel, sand, pine bark or any other material that might catch a wheelchair wheel or might not support the concentrated load of crutches as they are utilized in the moving of a disabled person along the path. Again, the walks should not have a slope greater than 1:20 unless ramp provisions are incorporated. Efforts should be made in the design of walks t6preverit wheelchair wheels from rolling off;the_ walk and dropping to the' level of grade In this'case'many wheelchairs will overturn and users are at risk of iniury.j Building Approach Another major issue in dealing with the accessibility needs of a particular facility is the building approach. The most accessible entrance is that entrance which has the least vertical rise required from the parking area to the floor of the facility. Typically, this is the grade level entrance. ADAAG requires, under their minimum requirements, that is entrances" when all entrances are not accessible, 7 ADA Facilities Compliance, 192 Land- Use /Roadway New Urban and Existing Urban and Functional Suburban Streets Suburban Streets Classification/ and Dwelling Unit Commercial and Industrial (All Both sides. Both sides. Every effort should Streets) be made to add sidewalks where they do not exist and complete missing links. Residential (Major Arterials Both sides. 9 Both sides. f Residential (Collectors) Both sides. Multifamily —both sides. Single family dwellings— prefer both sides; require at least one side. Residential (Local Streets) Both sides. Prefer both sides; require at least More than 4 Units Per Acre one side. 1 to 4 Units per Acre Prefer both sides; require at At least 4 -feet shoulder on both least one side. sides required. Less than 1 Unit per Acre One side preferred; shoulder One side preferred, at least on both sides required. 4 -feet shoulder on both sides required. NOTES: 1) Any local street within two blocks of a school site that would be on a walking route to school — sidewalk and curb and gutter required. 2) Sidewalks may be omitted on one side of a new street where that side clearly cannot be developed and where there are no existing or anticipated uses that would generate pedestrian trips on that side. 3) Where there are service roads, the sidewalk adjacent to the main road may be eliminated and replaced by a sidewalk adjacent to the service road on the side away from the main road. 4) For rural roads not likely to serve development, a shoulder at least 4 feet in width, preferably 8 feet on primary highways, should be provided. Surface material should provide a stable, mud -free walking surface. FIGURE 3 -4. Guidelines for Installing Sidewalks [31 Mailboxes installed behind sidewalk at curb -style sidewalks in Edina. I Nom andWo Btmxh Si 08 West 70 Beet Edina. UN 55436MM Fax 952.895.9686 Phone 9621150 n MIN c � �.e S 1 Toe Pau Poe Pe 9 m Dom M* CM: O uryart #IEEer Row.w 0 Man@ ComnuM 0 Pia m Rebr 0 Mom Rae:Vlo • Oononomm IL r t••f� T Lv r `fir ' b:° -�-o.44's „tee �.�•� C17 1 r I /b.n /. /r /. . A r0. f• 1 iil o.•r Sheen CORRECT METHOD OF MAIL BO� INSTALLATION FOR CITY DELIVERY HEIGHT: 45 - 48 INCHES ABOVE THE STREET LEVEL' HAVE BOX EXTEND AS FAR IN FRONT OF SUPPORT POST AS POSSIBLE. (THIS REDUCES RISK OF SNOW PLOW DAMAGE.) ' ADDRESS MUST BE ON SIDE OF BOX FROM WHICH CARRIER APPROACHES, IN LETTERS ABOUT ON (1) INCH HIGH (OR ON FRON OF BOX IN CASES WHERE BOXES ARE GROUPED.) BOX MUST BE LOCATED SO THAT THE CARRIER CAN SERVE WITHOUT LEAVING THE VEHICLE. CUSTOMERS MUST KEEP THE APPROACH TO THEIR MAILBOXES CLEAR OF OBSTRUCTIONS TO ALLOW SAFE ACCESS FOR DELIVERY. IF LISPS EMPLOYEES ARE IMPEDED IN REACHING A MAIL RECEPTACLE, THE POSTMASTER MAY WITH DRAW DELIVERY SERVICE. ov !; j 763 E. COOK Page 1 I i. UZI Customer Mall Receptacles D041 &3 , _.... D000 Basle Information D040 Delivery of Mail W41 Customer Mail Receptacles Summary D041 describes the standards for letterb me or other receptacles for the deposit or reoelpt of mail. it also oontalns the standards for curbside mailboxes. 1.0 BASIC STANDARDS Authorized Except as excluded by 1.2, every letterbox or other receptacle Intended or used for Depository the receipt or delivery of mail on any city defvery route, rural delivery route, 1.1 highway contract route, or other mail route is designated an authorized depository for mail within the meaning of 18 USC 1702,1705,1708. and 1725. Exclusions Door sots and nonlod®ble bins or troughs used with apartment house maMxms 1.2 are not letterboxes within the meaning of 18 USC 1725 and are not private mail receptacles for the standards for mailable matter not bearing postage found in or on private mail receptacles. The post or other support is not part of the receptacle. Use for Mall Except under 2.11, the receptacles described in 1.1 may be used only for matter 1.3 bearing postage. Other than as permitted by 2.10 or 2.11, no part of a mail receptaoe may be used to deliver any matter not bearing postage, including items or matter placed upon, supported by, attached 10, hung iron, or Inserted into a mail receptacle. Any mallable matter not bearing postage and found as described above Is subject to to same postage as would be paid If it were carded by mall. Clear Approach Customers must heap the approach to their mafflx s dear of obstructions to 1.4 allow safe access for delivery. If LISPS employees are impeded In reaching a mail receptacle, the postnaster may withdraw depvery service. 2.0 CURBSIDE MAILBOXES Manufacturer Manufactunsm of all malft oores designed and made to be erected at the edge of a SWIfIcatione roadway or curbside of a street and to be served by a carrier from a vehicle on any 2.1 oily route. rural route, or highway contract route must obtain approval of their products under LISPS Standard 7, MallbarM Cnp and Rural CurbsW Tb receive these construction standards and drawinge or other infomma6on about the marur(aohue of curbside mailboxes, write to LISPS Engineering (see G043 for address). Custont•Bullt The local postmaster may approve a curbside maBbox constructed by a customer Mailbox who, for aesthetic or other reasons, does not want to use an approved 2.2 manufactured boot. The custom -built boot must generally meet the same standards as approved manufactured boxes for flag, size, strength, and quality of construction. Address Identification Every ourbside mailbox must bear the following address information: 2.3 a. A boor number, if used, inscribed in contrasting color in now letters and numerals at least 1 Inch high on the side of the boot visible to the carriers regular approach, or on the door it boozes are grouped. b. A house number if street names and house numbers have been assigned by local authorities, and the postmaster authorizes their use as a postal address. If the base Is on a different street from the customers residence, the street name and house number must be inscribed on the box. DMM Issue 50 (6 -10413) D-9 9528359588 P . 04 ®0041.2.4 .. Customer Mall Race kiss Owner's Name The mailbox may gear the owner's name. 2.4 Advertising Any advertising on a mailbox or its support is prohibited. 2.5 Mailbox Post The post or other support for a curbside mailbox must be neat and of adequate 2.6 strength and size. The post may not represent effigies or caricatures that tend to disparage or ridicule any person. The box may be attached to a fixed or movable arm. Location Subject to state laws and regulations, a curbside mailbox must be placed to allow sate and convenient delivery by carriers Without leaving their vehicles. The box must be on the right hand side of the road in'the direction of travel of the carriers on any new rural route or highway contract route, In all cases where traffic conditions are dangerous for the carriers to drive to the left to reach the box, or where their doing so would violate traffic laws and regulations. More Than One If more than one Urrdy wishes to share a mail receptacle, the blowing standards Family apply. 2.8 a, Route and Box Number Addressing. n rural and highway r9• 9 waY rontraot routes authorized to use a route and box numbering system (e.g., RR 1 BCX 155), UP to fire families may share a single mad receptacle and use a common route and box designation. A written notice of agreement, signed by the heads of the tiarnilles or Individuals who want th Join In the use of such box, must be filed with the postrraster at the delivery office. a CONSMion to Street Name and Number Addressing. When street name and numbeft Systems are adopted, those addresses reflect distinct customer boadons and sequences. Rural and highway oonkaot route customers who are assigned different primary addresses (e.g.. 123 APPLE WAY vs. 136 APPLE WAY) should erect Individual mail receptacles in locations recommended by their postmasters and begin using their new addresses, Customers having different primary addresses who wish to oontinue sharing a Common receptade must use the address of the receptaclVe owner and the °care or address format: JOHN DOE C/O ROBERT SMITH 123 APPLE WAY Customers having a Common primary address (e.g.. 800 MAIN ST) but diffeerent secondary addresses (e.g., APT 101, APT 102, etc.) may continue to share a common ncreptads if single -poh delivery Is authorized for the Primary address. Secondary addresses should still be included in all oorrespondenoe. Locked Box A mailbox with a lock must have a slot that is large enough to accommodate the 2.9 customers normal dally mail volume. The USPS neither opens a locked boot nor accepts a key for this purpose. Delivery of Generally, curbside mailboxes are to be used for mail only. However, publishers of Unstamped newspapers regularly marled as Periodicals may, on Sundays and national Newspapers holidays only, place copies of the Sunday or holiday issues in the rural route and 2.10 highway oontraet route boxes of subscribers If those copies are removed from the boxes before the nod scheduled day of mall delivery, o-10 oMM mesas se (e -1e.0) Typical Mail Delivery on curb -style sidewalk. 6 /A 0 REPORURE C OMMENDATION. To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item IV.C. From: GORDON L. HUGHES Consent El CITY MANAGER Information Only ❑ Date: AUGUST 3, 2004 Mgr. Recommends El To HRA To Council Subject: "FALL INTO THE ARTS. ❑ Motion FESTIVAL' WINE.AND ® Resolution BEER TEMPORARY ❑ Ordinance DISPENSARY [1, Discussion RECOMMENDATION: Approve the establishment of a temporary dispensary for the sale of wine and beer at the "Fall Into The Arts Festival' on Saturday, September 11 and Sunday, September 12, 2004. INFORMATION/]BACKGROUND: n The Edina Art Center has requested authorization to conduct wine and beer sales in connection with the "Fall Into The Arts Festival' scheduled for September 11 and 12, 2004. Proceeds. from the sale of wine and beer at this event would benefit the Art Center. Sales of wine and beer would occur on the outdoor patio area located east of the Park Centrum building. Access to the area would be restricted by fencing and a gate. Individuals over 21 . years of age would be identified by a wristband, similar to that used by the 50'' & France Professional Association at its Art Fair. The wine and the beer would be dispensed by full or part-time employees of the Art Center. As with the 50th & France Art Fair, the "Fall Into 1' REPORPRECOMMENDAT ION — "Fall Into The Arts Festival" August 3, 2004 Page two The Arts Festival" would hire an off -duty police officer to monitor activities in the area where wine and beer are served. All other restrictions imposed on the 50d, & France Arty Fair would be observed at the "Fall Into The Arts Festival ", including restrictions on signage and hours of operation. In that the City, by way of the Art Center would be the operator of this facility, we think it would be appropriate to establish a temporary dispensary as opposed to issuing a temporary intoxicating liquor license. In our view, this is in keeping with recent interpretations by the State Liquor Control Board. 0 ,, 2 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # IV. D. From:, Wayne D. Houle, PE r— Consent ❑ City Engineer Information Only ❑ ° Date: August 3, 2004 Subject: Resolution supporting partnership with Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and other public agencies within district. Recommendation: Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ® Motion 6�I Resolution Ordinance Discussion Adopt attached resolution supporting partnership with Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) to provide guidance and recommendations on policy development, technical issues, and public involvement to create a common vision and' implementation for the Minnehaha Creek Corridor. Info /Background: The MCWD is undertaking revisions to their 1997 Watershed Management Plan; an updated plan is required every 10 years for watershed districts. As part of the revisioning process the MCWD is inviting all district stakeholders to participate. The process involves a three -year commitment to the Policy Board, Technical Advisory Committee, and a Public Advisory Committee. The following is the member profile and time commitment for each committee as it applies to the City: Policy Board Technical Advisory Committee Public Advisory Committee One City Council Member City Staff Two citizen representatives Quarterly meetings Monthly meetings as needed Monthly as needed City staff will be recommending representatives for the Public Advisory Committee at a future Council Meeting. Mike Wyatt a staff member with the MCWD will be at the meeting to give a brief presentation and to answer any questions regarding this partnership. RESOLUTION NO. 2004-69 Nr ( T _ y0 t� .3 v• '�`�nrtroMTti A RESOLUTION City of Edina CREATING A MINNEHAHA CREEK PARTNERSHIP WHEREAS, Minnehaha Creek is a highly valued stream flowing from Lake Minnetonka to the Mississippi River; and WHEREAS, the preservation and enhancement of the Minnehaha Creek Corridor is a high- priority expressed in the comprehensive plans for each of the cities along the Creek, and the Water Resources Management Plan of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District; and WHEREAS, urbanization in the Minnehaha Creek Watershed has led to the degradation of the stream's flow regime, habitat and water quality, but the Creek has high potential for restoration; and WHEREAS, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District completed in 2003 a detailed Hydrologic /Hydraulic and Pollutant Loading Study, and a Minnehaha Creek Stream Assessment; and WHEREAS the MCWD will undertake revisions to its Watershed Management Plan in partnership with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Feasibility Study to explore the potential federal interest for Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration and Flood Damage Reduction in the Minnehaha Creek Corridor; WHEREAS, the City of Edina desires to partner with the other communities along the Creek to seek protection and restoration of the Minnehaha Creek Corridor; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Edina supports the formation of a partnership to provide guidance and recommendations on policy development, technical issues, and public involvement to create a common vision and implementation plan for the Minnehaha Creek Corridor, to be organized as follows: 1. Partnership Comyosition The partnership will comprise the following partners: • City of Minnetonka; • City of Hopkins; • City of St. Louis Park; • City of Edina; • City of Minneapolis; • Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board; City Hall 1 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 • Hennepin County; and • Minnehaha Creek Watershed District 2. Policy Board a. The partnership Policy Board will comprise a member of the governing body of each of the partner organizations. b. The Policy Board will generally meet quarterly as needed and pursuant to an established project schedule and work plan. 3. Technical Advisory Committee a. The Technical Advisory Committee will provide technical review and recommendations to the partnership and will comprise a staff representative from each of the partner organizations, and a representative from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Minnesota Department of Health and such other governmental agencies having a technical interest and expertise to offer for the benefit of the Minnehaha Creek Corridor. b. The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District technical representative will serve as the Chair of the Technical Advisory Committee. c. The Technical Advisory Committee will generally meet monthly as needed pursuant to the established project work schedule and work plan. 4. Public Advisory Committee a. The Public Advisory Committee will comprise two citizen representatives designated by each partner organization, and up to seven other representatives of stakeholder organizations named by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District to represent conservation, property owner, development, and recreational interests in the Minnehaha Creek Watershed appointed by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed through an open application process. b. The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District will designate one of its Board Members to serve as Chair to the Public Advisory Committee. c. The Public Advisory Committee will generally meet monthly as needed pursuant to the established project schedule and work plan. 5. Legal Authority It is understood that the decisions and activities of the partnership are advisory only, and will not have any binding legal authority on any of the partnership's members. The parties to the partnership expect that recommendations developed and approved by the partnership will be duly considered and acted upon by the governing body of the respective the partnership members. 6. Term The partnership will meet and work for an initial period of three (3) years, concluding on or before March 1, 2007, subject to a determination to renew the work of the partnership by each of its partner organizations. ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of August 3, 2004, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 3 ,20 . City Clerk 1- ..0 {► ti 92372 60731 5821.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS' 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 24.75 R55CKREG LOG20000 92373 60730 5841.6180 CITY OF EDINA YORK OCCUPANCY 24.75 CHEMICAL CERTIFICATION 92374 60729 5861.6180 Council Check Register, VERNON OCCUPANCY 335.47 CHEMICAL CERTIFICATION 92499 60600 5630.6230 7/22/2004 -7/22/2004 92603 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 261680 7/2212004 100616 ACTION MAILING SERVICES INC. 7122/2004 103367 ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO 362.69 MAIL PROCESS 92371 99917 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SYSINVO3103 1120.6406 362.69 159.75 261681 7/22/2004 102626 AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES 712212004 102172 APPERTS FOODSERVICE 636.38 CEMENT 92197 4073888 1314.6520 CONCRETE 226982 5421.5510 633.41 CEMENT 92198 4073467 1314.6520 CONCRETE 211.88 CEMENT 92427 4075215 5932.6520 CONCRETE 591.18 CEMENT 92428 4075214 1314.6520 CONCRETE 92225 2210.6103 2,072.85 222.07 261682 7/22/2004 111228 ALDEN POOL & MUNICIPAL SUPPLY 712212004 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 686.39 PUMP REPAIR PARTS 92199 401184 5915.6530 REPAIR PARTS 6013 - 403927 7411.6406 1,222.17 CHEMICAL EJECTOR 92429 401081 05413.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES 1,908.56 - 261683 712212004 100675 ALL SAFE FIRE & SECURITY 7/21/2004 10:35:15 Page - 1 Business Unit GENERAL (BILLING) STREET RENOVATION STREET RENOVATION GENERAL STORM SEWER STREET RENOVATION WATER TREATMENT WATER TREATMENT PLANT #2 20.85 CHEMICAL CERTIFICATION 92372 60731 5821.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS' 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 24.75 CHEMICAL CERTIFICATION 92373 60730 5841.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS YORK OCCUPANCY 24.75 CHEMICAL CERTIFICATION 92374 60729 5861.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS VERNON OCCUPANCY 335.47 CHEMICAL CERTIFICATION 92499 60600 5630.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTENNIAL LAKES ENGINEERING GENERAL PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL ADMINISTRATION GRILL COMMUNICATIONS PSTF OCCUPANCY 405.82 261684 7/2212004 116726 ALLISON, SHARON 7.34 BATTERIES 92603 071604 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 100.00 NOTARY COMMISSION FEE 92603 071604 1240.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 107.34 261686 7122/2004 103367 ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO 159.75 VIDEO TAPES 92297 SYSINVO3103 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 159.75 261686 712212004 102172 APPERTS FOODSERVICE 767.98 FOOD 92500 226982 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 767.98 261687 712212004 101276 APRES 222.07 RENTAL SUPPLIES 92200 92225 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 222.07 261688 712212004 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 69.70 COFFEE 92366 6013 - 403927 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL ADMINISTRATION GRILL COMMUNICATIONS PSTF OCCUPANCY R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation Council Check Register 69.70 Page - 2 261689 712212004 - 7/22/2004 100929 ARCTIC GLACIER INC. PO # Doc No 27.75 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 21.00 387419109 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 105.50 92247 387419208 5862.5515 107.50 VERNON SELLING 92339 385419206 261.75 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 261690 7122/2004 387419413 114563 ARDIE & FRIENDS COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 30.03 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 30.03 92501 261691 712212004 COST OF GOODS SOLD 101964 AUGIE'S INC. 92391 071104 59.40 FOOD ART CENTER REVENUES 92365 59.40 1470.4329 261692 7122/2004 92201 112862 AXELSON, MARY 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 34.29 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 17934 1647.6406 34.29 PATHS & HARD SURFACE 261693 7122/2004 1628.4392.09 116701 AZAR, MIGUEL SENIOR CITIZENS 92604 662.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT GENERAL SUPPLIES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 662.00 4895800 261694 7/2212004 VERNON SELLING 100642 BANNERS TO GO 38648400 5862.5515 364.23 SIGNS 92250 29980600 38.34 SIGNS VERNON SELLING 402.57 261695 712212004 116724 BARNES, DOROTHY 19.00 PROGRAM REFUND 19.00 261696 712212004 102346 BEARCOM 115.02 PARADE SUPPLIES 115.02 261697 712212004 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 249.65 88.47 345.00 .CITY OF EDINA 7/21/2004 10:35:15 Council Check Register Page - 2 7/22/2004 - 7/22/2004 PO # Doc No Inv No . Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 92246 387419109 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 92247 387419208 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 92339 385419206 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 92451 387419413 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 92390 071104 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 92501 4490 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 92391 071104 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 92365 071404 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 92201 17876 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS 92298 17934 1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 92583 071504 1628.4392.09 SENIOR SPECIAL EVENTS SENIOR CITIZENS 92604 2665787 1627.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 92248 4895800 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 92249 38648400 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX _ VERNON SELLING 92250 29980600 - 862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING CITY OF EDINA 7121/2004 10:35:15 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 3 7/22/2004 - 7/22/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 285.00 92251 30040600 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 14.74 92340 38661000 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 322.50 92341 30077800 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 567.50 92342 30082700 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,942.00 92452 30077700 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 67.56 92453 38662500 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 789.00 92454 30040500 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 4,671.42 261698 712212004 100661 BENN, BRADLEY 184.60 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 92393 071104 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 184.60 261699 712212004 116714 BERGERSON, RON 75.00 AWARD OF EXCELLENCE 92555 071304 5120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 75.00 261700 7/2212004 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 23.42 OFFICE SUPPLIES 92567 3085160 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 40.43 OFFICE SUPPLIES 92567 3085160 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 45.93 OFFICE SUPPLIES 92567 3085160 1160.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FINANCE 173.63 OFFICE SUPPLIES 92567 3085160 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 91.89 OFFICE SUPPLIES 92568 3074130 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 530.68 LAMINATOR, HEADSET 92584 3061230 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES _ POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 48.94 RECORDER 92638 3076620 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 954.92 261701 712212004 116715 BIDDINGTON, TREENA 40.00 AWARD OF MERIT 92556 071304 5120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 40.00 261702 712212004 101676 BIFFS INC 859.23 RESTROOM RENTAL 92299 W224764 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE 166.68 RESTROOM RENTAL 92300 VM5836 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE 71.26 RESTROOM RENTAL 92301 W225839 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE 242.91 RESTROOM RENTAL 92302 W225840 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE 52.77 RESTROOM RENTAL 92303 W225841 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE 124.82 RESTROOM RENTAL 92569 W225837 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 62.41 RESTROOM RENTAL 92570 M25838 5430.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 1,580.08 261703 712212004 100663 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS R55CKREG LOG20000 110.00 PUMP HOLDING TANK CITY OF EDINA 6375 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE Council Check Register 7/22/2004 — 7/22/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1,990.63 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 146.91 ASPHALT 92202 93446 1301.6518 BLACKTOP 1,990.63 146.91 261704 7/22/2004 100663 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS 8,022.10 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 5 92361 071404 10086.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 8,022.10 127.37 261706 712212004 100664 BJORK STONE INC. 712212004 100873 BROCKWAY, MAUREEN 1,462.50 STONE WALL REPAIR 92430 071204 1344.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 92394 071104 1,462.50 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 74.75 261706 7/22/2004 116720 BJORNNES, CONNIE 261712 7/22/2004 116716 BROWN, DAVID M 20.00 PROGRAM REFUND 92563 071504 1600.4390.01 PLAYGROUND 75.00 20.00 92557 071304 5120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 261707 7/2212004 75.00 103866 BLALOCK, KAREN 261713 34.45 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 92392 071104 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 34.45 37.28 BATTERIES 92431 2469 261708 712212004 SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 100623 BOSS PUMPING 37.28 7/21/2004 10:35:15 Page- 4 Business Unit GENERAL MAINTENANCE CITY HALL SIDEWALK RETAINING WALL MAINTENANCE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL ART CENTER REVENUES 110.00 PUMP HOLDING TANK 92304 6375 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 110.00 261709 7122/2004 106367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 1,990.63 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 92639 943189 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,990.63 261710 7122/2004 103239 BRIN NORTHWESTERN GLASS CO. 127.37 ACRYLIC 92203 601064 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 127.37 261711 712212004 100873 BROCKWAY, MAUREEN 74.75 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 92394 071104 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 74.75 261712 7/22/2004 116716 BROWN, DAVID M 75.00 AWARD OF EXCELLENCE 92557 071304 5120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 75.00 261713 7122/2004 116711 BY APPOINTMENT ONLY 37.28 BATTERIES 92431 2469 1627.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 37.28 CITY OF EDINA 7121/2004 10:35:15 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 5 7/22/2004 - 7/22/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 261714 7122/2004 105315 CALTON, BOB 37.05 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 92395 071104 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 37.05 261715 7/2212004 106466 CARROT -TOP INDUSTRIES INC. 126.50 US FLAGS 92305 349052 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 126.50 261716 7122/2004 112811 CASTREJON INC. 9,160.00 DRAIN TILE 92571 1720 04294.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS OLINGER BLVD - DRAIN TILE 9,160.00 261717 712212004 100681 CATCO 50.88 HOSE ENDS, FITTINGS 92640 32 -22339 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 16.04 FITTINGS 92641 1 -77722 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN' 38.55. FITTINGS 92642 3 -52311 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 49.08 FITTINGS 92643 3 -52265 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 154.55 261718 712212004 102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 38.13 CD -RW DRIVE 92204 NE41533 1495.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT INSPECTIONS 519.72 DIGITAL CAMERA 92204 NE41533 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 519.72 DIGITAL CAMERA 92204 NE41533 1627.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 519.72 DIGITAL CAMERA 92204 NE41533 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 692.53 DIGITAL CAMERA 92204 NE41533 1190.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ASSESSING 2,289.82 261719 712212004 116700 CENTRAL COMMUNITY CENTER 60.00 PARTIAL REFUND 92306 071304. 5301.4541 GENERAL ADMISSIONS AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES 60.00 261720 7122/2004 104363 CHOICEPOINT INC. 80.00 CREDIT CHECKS 92585 AB0000972750 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 80.00 261721 712212004 100684 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON 5,725.77 2ND QTR LAB SERVICES 92432 071304 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 5,725.77 261722 712212004 100687 CITY OF RICHFIELD 492.27 ELECTRIC BILLING 92605 2094 5932.6185 LIGHT & POWER GENERAL STORM SEWER R55CKREG LOG20000 OPEN HOUSE POSTCARDS 92502 9137 CITY OF EDINA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 2,284.00 MAGNA -SEAL POSTCARD DESIGN 92503 9140 Council Check Register PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 1,573.63 BROCHURE DESIGN 92504 9138 7/22/2004 - 7/22/2004 COMMUNICATIONS Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description OPEN HOUSE AD DESIGN 92506 492.27 2210.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER COMMUNICATIONS 13,047.00 ABOUT TOWN- SPRING DESIGN 261723 7/22/2004 2210.6123 100688 CITYWIDE WINDOW SERVICE INC COMMUNICATIONS 7,719.50 ABOUT BUSINESS- SPRING DESIGN 92508 9034 2210.6123 14.38 WINDOW CLEANING 92205 336737 5861.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 16.62 WINDOW CLEANING 92205 336737 5821.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 27.04 WINDOW CLEANING 92205 336737 5841.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 102.88 58.04 261724 712212004 106316 CLARK, PENNY 293.94 PLANTS 92206 26.00 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 92396 071104 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 26.00 261730 712212004 100701 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO. 261726 7/22/2004 102122 CLINNET SOLUTIONS LLC 33.50 BELTS 92509 127327 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 38.00 DRUG TESTING 92307 814863 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL 76.00 DRUG TESTING 92644 815115 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL 114.00 261726 7/22/2004 116709 CLISE, WENDY 110.00 PROGRAM REFUND 92433 071404 1600.4390.04 NATURE CAMP 110.00 261727 7/22/2004 101346 COLOURS 7/21/2004 10:35:15 Page- 6 Business Unit VERNON OCCUPANCY 50TH ST OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY ART CENTER REVENUES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 1,431.00 OPEN HOUSE POSTCARDS 92502 9137 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 2,284.00 MAGNA -SEAL POSTCARD DESIGN 92503 9140 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 1,573.63 BROCHURE DESIGN 92504 9138 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 2,056.00 BROCHURE DESIGN 92505 9143 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 556.00 OPEN HOUSE AD DESIGN 92506 9158 2210.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER COMMUNICATIONS 13,047.00 ABOUT TOWN- SPRING DESIGN 92507 9085 2210.6123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 7,719.50 ABOUT BUSINESS- SPRING DESIGN 92508 9034 2210.6123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 28,667.13 261728 712212004 101915 COUNTRY FLAGS 102.88 FLAGS 92645 9882 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 102.88 261729 7/2212004 112790 CROSS NURSERIES INC. 293.94 PLANTS 92206 017175 5630.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS CENTENNIAL LAKES 293.94 261730 712212004 100701 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO. 33.50 BELTS 92509 127327 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 33.50 7/21/2004 10:35:15 Page- 7 Business Unit GRILL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ART CENTER REVENUES 382.50 MERCHANDISE 92510 787864 CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP R55CKREG LOG20000 382.50 261735 7/2212004 Council Check Register 7/22/2004 -7 /22/2004 TREE SERVICE Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 261731 7/22/2004 116723 CUSTOM WATERWORKS 261736 712212004 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING 1,512.00 BOTTLED WATER 92572 29047 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 58.80 1,512.00 92252 270791 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 261732 7122/2004 65.80 101681 DAKOTA COUNTY TECHNICAL COLLEG 92253 271670 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 380.00 DRIVING COURSES 92586 070204 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 271669 5862.5514 380.00 VERNON SELLING 46.60 261733 712212004 5842.5515 103143 DAKOTA MAE DESIGNS YORK SELLING 1,592.58 92344 81.90 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 92397 071104 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 839.00 81.90 272112 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 261734 712212004 102121 DATREK PROFESSIONAL BAGS INC 272521 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 7/21/2004 10:35:15 Page- 7 Business Unit GRILL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ART CENTER REVENUES 382.50 MERCHANDISE 92510 787864 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 382.50 261735 7/2212004 116713 DAVEY TREE EXPERT CO., THE 426.00 TREE SERVICE 92511 96500988 5630.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL LAKES 426.00 261736 712212004 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING 58.80 92252 270791 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 65.80 92253 271670 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 985.60 92254 271669 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 46.60 92343 272520 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,592.58 92344 272519 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 839.00 92345 272112 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,088.80 92346 272521 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 19,80 92347 272522 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 4,696.98 261737 7/2212004 114566 DEIRDRE & CO. 37.05 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 92398 071104 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 37.05 261738 7/2212004 100720 DENNYS 6TH AVE. BAKERY 68.09 BAKERY 92512 171971 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 46.61 BAKERY 92513 171970 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 27.84 BAKERY 92514 172032 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 37.94 BAKERY 92515 172107 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 136.09 BAKERY 92516 172138 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7121/2004 10:35:15 Council Check Register Page - 8 7/22/2004 - 7/2212004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 316.57 261739 712212004 116717 DEWITT DUFFY, BARBARA 40.00 AWARD OF MERIT 92558 071304 5120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 40.00 261740 712212004 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST LLC 22.40 92646 021373145000 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 90.30 92646 021373145000 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 122.60 92646 021373145000 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 554.00 92646 021373145000 5610.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 789.30 261741 7/2212004 108648 DOAN, SIIRI 119.60 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 92399 071104 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 119.60 261742 712212004 114271 DOBOSZENSKI & SONS INC. 9,000.00 FINAL PAYMENT 92362 071404 4400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CITY HALL/POLICE BUILDING 9,000.00 261743 7/22/2004 101691 DON BETZEN GOLF SUPPLY CO. 359.50 BAGS 92517 18382 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 359.50 261744 7/2212004 100731 DPC INDUSTRIES 320.11 CHLORINE 92207 82701025 -04 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 3,589.32 CHEMICALS 92434 82701002 -04 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 3,909.43 261746 712212004 104868 DUNN, MATT 150.00 FAMILY JAMBOREE MAGICAN 92647 071904 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 150.00 261746 7/22/2004 100739 EAGLE WINE 670.20 92255 916269 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 182.00 92256 916749 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 203.65 92348 918296 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,148.97 92455 918297 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4.25 92456 918048 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,209.07 CITY OF EDINA nnicuuv w:�a: �� R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 9 7/22/2004 —7/22/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor ! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 261747 7/22/2004 100741 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 2,794.80 92257 322529 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,638.10 92457 322635 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 326.00 92518 13014 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 4,284.70 92624 322646 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 9,043.60 261748 7122/2004 100742 ECOLAB PEST ELIMINATION DIVISI 141.65 PEST CONTROL 92519 3586276 5630.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTENNIAL LAKES 141.65 261749 7/22/2004 116448 EGAN OIL COMPANY 13,017.62 GAS 92208 82542 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 13,017.62 261750 712212004 116698 EGRESS WINDOW GUY INC. 77.80 PERMIT REFUND 92209 ED026784 1495.4111 BUILDING PERMITS INSPECTIONS 77.80 261751 7/22/2004 104331 EILERS, JOYCE 129.35 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 92400 071104 5101.4413 ARTWORK SOLD - ART CENTER REVENUES 129.35 261752 7/22/2004 105294 EKLUND MULCH SALES _ 1,202.40 RED MULCH 92308 00536 1644.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES TREES & MAINTENANCE 1,202.40 261763 7/22/2004 106339 ENRGI 176.25 WEBSITE DEVELOPMENT 92520 1711 2210.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 176.25 261764 712212004 100752 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC. 2,028.83 STORM SEWER CASTING 92210 GG2857 5932.6536 CASTINGS GENERAL STORM SEWER 2,216.27 CASTING & RINGS 92309 GG2921 5932.6536 CASTINGS GENERAL STORM SEWER 266.25 ADJUSTING RINGS 92435 GG3093 5932.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL STORM SEWER 4,511.35 261756 7/2212004 100297 FAST FOTO & DIGITAL 41.81 PHOTO FINISHING 92648 T2- 185093 1470.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 41.81 261766 7122/2004 100755 FAST FRAME R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/21/2004 10:35:15 Council Check Register Page - 10 7/22/2004 - 7/22/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 248.94 FRAME 92436 17711655 5310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL ADMINISTRATION 248.94 261767 712212004 100766 FEDERAL EXPRESS 27.76 COURIER 92437 1- 878 -76328 1120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 27.76 261768 712212004 116702 FELDMANN, JOHN 126.46 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 92367 071404 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 126.46 261769 712212004 112238 FERGESEN, NANCY 20.00 PROGRAM REFUND 92310 071204 1600.4390.01 PLAYGROUND PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 20.00 261760 7/2212004 116492 FINANCE AND COMMERCE 69.00 REAL ESTATE THURSDAY 92649 071904 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING 69.00 261761 712212004 114661 FIRESIDE HEARTH & HOME 66.80 PERMIT REFUND 92211 ED026713 1495.4110 HEATING & VENTING LICENSE INSPECTIONS 66.80 261762 7/2212004 104205 FLICKER, KEVIN 48.75 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 92401 071104 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 48.75 261763 7/22/2004 105824 FLYING CLOUD ANIMAL HOSPITAL 55.17 K9 EXAM 92587 263508 1438.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES K -9 UNIT 55.17 261764 712212004 101476 FOOTJOY 36.52 SHOES 92521 5935833 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO.SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 36.52 261765 712212004 100760 FOWLER ELECTRIC 96.30 VOLTAGE REGULATORS 92650 60531900 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 114.07 OIL FILTERS 92651 60563000 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 210.37 261766 712212004 106608 GEMPLER'S INC. 31.90 UNIFORM 92311 1004959459 '546.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENM " R55CKREG LOG20000 7/2212004 CITY OF EDINA 16.67 Council Check Register. 92312 071304 5861.6406 49.93 7/22/2004. —7/22/2004 071304 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 261773, 712212004 31.90 106407 GRAY, CAROL 261767 712212004 CURATOR 114801 GLADSTONE CONSTRUCTION INC. 071304 5120.6103 600.00 151,763.67 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 6 92363 071404 05413.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 151,763.67 590.17 HAND DRYER 261768 7/2212004 5630.6530 100779 GOPHER CASH REGISTER 590.17 300.90 PRINTER REPAIR 92522 18832 5424.6530 REPAIR PARTS 77.21 REGISTER TAPE 92523 23992 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 378.11 261769 712212004 116727 GOPHER STAGE LIGHTING 7,391.33 LIGHTING CONTROLS 92606 29463 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 7,391.33 261770 7/22/2004 101103 GRAINGER 128.67 BATTERIES 92607 495 - 393733 -3 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 128.67 261771 712212004 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 7/21/2004 10:35:15 Page - 11 Business Unit WATER TREATMENT PLANT #2 RANGE RANGE EDINBOROUGH PARK PSTF OCCUPANCY 379.00 92458 65493 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 370.00- 92459 65321 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1.748.00 92625 65494 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 261772 7/2212004 101618 GRAUSAM, STEVE 16.67 WATER DRAIN & CLAMP 92312 071304 5861.6406 49.93 TRASH BAGS, CLEANERS 92312 071304 5840.6406 66.80 261773, 712212004 106407 GRAY, CAROL 600.00 CURATOR 92554 071304 5120.6103 600.00 261774 7/2212004 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 590.17 HAND DRYER 92524 902557129 5630.6530 590.17 261776 7/2212004 102125 GREG LESSMAN SALES 124.30 TOWELS ,TEES 92525 28511 5440.5511 124.30 GENERALSUPPLIES VERNON OCCUPANCY GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/21/2004 10:35:15 Council Check Register Page - 12 7122/2004 -7/22/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 261776 712212004 100762 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. 212.05 92349 918078 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 2,596.90 92350 918080 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 127.80 92460 918083 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,838.80 92461 912310 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3.40 92462 917846 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,493.05 92463 918032 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,726.79 92464 918076 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING .85 92465 917848 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 8,999.64 261777 7/2212004 100166 GRITTON, KAY 107.90 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 92402 071104 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 107.90 261778 712212004 102680 GUEST SERVICES INC 207.00 NFA MEAL TICKET 92652 190908 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 207.00 261779 712212004 102869 GUEST, LISA 94.90 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 92403 071104 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 94.90 261780 7/2212004. 102320 HAMCO DATA PRODUCTS 107.90 REGISTER PAPER 92440 236327 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 107.90 261781 7/22/2004 116710 HAMMES, TIM 78.00 CLASS REFUND 92438 062304 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 78.00 261782 7/22/2004 104723 HANSEN, WILLIAM C. _ 1,165.00 SIDEWALK PAVER REPAIRS 92313 071204 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET REVOLVING 1,165.00 261783 7/22/2004 114566 HARTKE, BRENDA 27.30 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 92404 071104 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 27.30 261784 712212004 100797 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT 329.36 POOL CHEMICALS 92526 631404 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 329.36 CITY OF EDINA 7/21/2004 10:35:15 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 13 7/22/2004 —7/22/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 261786 712212004 102190 HAYNES, PATRICIA 28.93 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 92405 071104 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 28.93 261786 7/2212004 101209 HEIMARK FOODS 200.64 MEAT PATTIES 92527 017707 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 200.64 261787 7122/2004 101216 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFI 565.36 BOOKING FEE - JUNE 04 92588 228 1195.6170 COURT CHARGES LEGAL SERVICES 565.36 261788 712212004 100806 HIRSHFIELD'S 20.22 PAINT 92528 003914829 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 20.22 261789 712212004 100806 HOBART CORP 199.24 DISHWASHER REPAIR 92573 20853723 5421.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GRILL 199.24 261790 7/22/2004 104376 HOHENSTEINS INC. 593.95 92258 334638 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 455.00 92351 335606 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD SEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,048.95 261791 712212004 112628 ICEE COMPANY, THE 1,303.80 CONCESSION PRODUCT 92314 049878 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 1,303.80 261792 712212004 102640 IPMA 270.00 FIREFIGHTER EXAMS 92653 10043282 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 270.00 261793 712212004 101403 J -CRAFT 58.73 WELDMENT 92315 34801 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 58.73 261794 7/22/2004 113483 J.S. CATES CONSTRUCTION 11,064.00 CONTRACT PAYMENT 92608 08 -73 -427 5453.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS MAINTENANCE BUILDING 11,064.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7/22/2004 -7/2212004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 261795 712212004 101612 JACK RICHESON & CO. INC. 102.99 POTTERY KITS 92380 0273962 -IN 5120.5510 102.99 261796 712212004 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 106163 JACKSON LANDSCAPE SUPPLY INC. COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,810.50 HYDROSEEDING 92316 0131891 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,810.50 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 261797 7122/2004 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 100830 JERRY'S PRINTING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 9.59 HAND STAMP 92529 29827 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 9.59 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 261798 712212004 102146 JESSEN PRESS 1,470.10 WATER REPORT 92439 49590 15,512.13 ABOUT TOWN 92439 49590 16,982.23 261799 7/2212004 116416 JM KILEY & SONS TRUCKING 190.10 TRUCKING CHARGE 92212 2637 190.10 261800 7122/2004 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 120.62 92259 1748452 104.50 92260 1745378 794.30 92261 1748445 831.77 92262 1748446 133.85 92263 1749565 1,537.49 92264 1748438 919.84 92265 1748439 166.40- 92266 254658 59.30 92466 1752164 764.13 92467 1752151 95.45 92468 1752152 677.64 92469 1752153 101.18 92470 1752154 4.88- 92471 255052 4,741.04 92626 1752156 4,649.39 92627 1752157 204.60 92628 1752155 156.49 92629 1752158 47.90 92630 1752159 15,768.21 1643.6103 5430.6513 5913.6575 2210.6123 1301.6518 5862.5513 5862.5514 5862.5513 5862.5513 5822.5512 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5862.5513 5822.5512 5822.5515 5822.5513 5822.5513 5862.5512 5842.5513 5842.5512 5842.5512 5842.5515 5842.5515 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES OFFICE SUPPLIES 7/21/2004 10:35:15 Page - 14 Business Unit ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP GENERAL TURF CARE RICHARDS GOLF COURSE PRINTING DISTRIBUTION MAGAZINEINEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING CITY OF EDINA 7/21/2004 10:35:15 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register. Page - 15 7/22/2004 -7/2212004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 261801 712212004 103664 JOHNSON, DENISE 45.50 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 92406 071104 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 45.50 261802 712212004 101414 KAR PRODUCTS 259.27 CLEANERS 92213 3911219001 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 259.27 261803 7122/2004 116707 KAUL, SHEFALI 16.25 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 92425 071104 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 16.25 261804 712212004 116295 KING PAR CORPORATION 832.00 GOLF CLUBS 92530 2233312 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 4.59 FREIGHT 92531 2232886 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 171.39 GOLF CLUBS 92532 2236669 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 171.27 GOLF CLUBS 92533 2236822 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 671.23 GOLF CLUBS 92534 2231452 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,850.48 261806 7/22/2004 102101 KINKO'S 57.49 SIGNS 92574 062200049592 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 57.49 261806 7122/2004 101186 KNUTSON, KAREN 61.10 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 92407 071104 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 61.10 261807 712212004 101340 KOCHENASH, RICK 75.00 AWARD OF EXCELLENCE 92559 071304 5120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 75.00 261808 7122/2004 106887 KOESSLER, JOE 139.00 FEE FOR JULY 04 92654 070104 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 139.00 261809 712212004 114669 KOLODJI, JAN M 31.20 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 92408 071104 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 31.20 261810 7/2212004 114344 KRAEMER, KARIN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/21/2004 10:35:15 Council Check Register Page - 16 7/22/2004 — 7/22/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No . Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 72.80 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 92409 071104 5101.4413 ARTWORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 72.80 261811 712212004 100846 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO 1,687.10 92267 406053 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 38.00 92268 406052 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,725.10 261812 712212004 100847 KUNDE CO INC 522.34 OAKWILT PROGRAM 92441 13162 1644.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREES & MAINTENANCE 522.34 261813 712212004 105028 LAEDTKE, ELISE 40.00 FIELD TRIP REFUND 92442 071404 1600.4390.01 PLAYGROUND PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 40.00 261814 7/2212004 106201 LAKE WEED HARVESTING 2,502.50 WEED REMOVAL 92655 258 4086.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AQUATIC WEEDS 2,502.50 261815 7/22/2004 115862 LANO EQUIPMENT INC. 53.63 FILTERS 92575 79155 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 53.63 261816 7/22/2004 116722 LANZO, BARBARA 682.00 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 92565 071104 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 682.00 261817 7122/2004 116721 LANZO, LEE ANN 260.00 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 92566 071104 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 260.00 261818 712212004 102111 LASER TECHNOLOGY INC. 265.68 LASER MAINTENANCE 92589 31526RI 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 265.68 261819 7122/2004 100446 LATHAM, MEGAN 47.01 PARADE SUPPLIES 92443 071404 1627.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 47.01 261820 712212004 102375 LATHAM, PATTY L. 64.42 PARADE SUPPLIES 92444 071404 1627.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 7/21/2004 10:35:15 Page- 17 Business Unit DISTRIBUTION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE SENIOR CITIZENS TRAINING COMMUNICATIONS 50.60 92576 23974/23980 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 90.50 92576 23974/23980 5910.6160 DATA PROCESSING CITY OF EDINA 201.60 R55CKREG LOG20000 92576 23974/23980 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 700.00 92576 23974/23980 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES Council Check Register . 977.03 92576 23974/23980 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING 7/22/2004 - 7/22/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 23974/23980 1551.6180 64.42 CITY HALL GENERAL 6,381.70 92576 23974/23980 261821 712212004 CITY HALUPOLICE BUILDING 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 119.28 TRU -TORQS 92609 2188876 5913.6406 GENERAL- SUPPLIES 66.95 119.28 92590 071604 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 261822 712212004 100854 LEITNER COMPANY 261827 712212004 101453 LUTZ, RICHARD M. 1,645.52 SAND, DIRT 92214 070104 5422.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK 92591 071604 31172.82 SAND, DIRT 92214 070104 5422.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT 453.26 SOIL 92215 JUL 1 5431.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT 5,271.60 548.94 CANDY 92577 162907 5320.5510 261823 7/22/2004 116575 LIFE LINE INC. 168.00 CPR TRAINING 92216 LL -1069 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 616.00 CPR TRAINING 92216 LL -1069 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 784.00 261824 7122/2004 100856 LINHOFF PHOTO 138.60 PHOTO PROCESSING 92317 68718 2210.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 138.60 261825 712212004 100858 LOGIS 7/21/2004 10:35:15 Page- 17 Business Unit DISTRIBUTION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE SENIOR CITIZENS TRAINING COMMUNICATIONS 50.60 92576 23974/23980 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 90.50 92576 23974/23980 5910.6160 DATA PROCESSING GENERAL (BILLING) 201.60 92576 23974/23980 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 700.00 92576 23974/23980 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 977.03 92576 23974/23980 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING FINANCE 1,804.26 92576 23974/23980 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 5,962.00 92576 23974/23980 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL 6,381.70 92576 23974/23980 4400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CITY HALUPOLICE BUILDING 16,167.69 261826 712212004 105130 LUECKE, JULIE 66.95 KEYBOARD SPUTTER 92590 071604 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 66.95 261827 712212004 101453 LUTZ, RICHARD M. 176.97 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 92591 071604 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 176.97 261828 7/2212004 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 548.94 CANDY 92577 162907 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS R55CKREG LOG20000 Cheek # Date Amount Vendor/ Explanation 350.54 CANDY 899.48 Council Check Register 261829 7122/2004 100864 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. 2,449.50 PATCHER RENTAL 2,449.50 261830 7122/2004 100865 MAGNUSON SOD 80.00- 100868 MARK VII SALES 70.62 Business Unit 261831 7/22/2004 116708 MAGNUSON, BRIGHTON Council Check Register 32.50 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 7/22/2004 32.50 261832 7/2212004 Inv No 100868 MARK VII SALES Subledger Account Description Business Unit 55.95 163074 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 1,715.00 92318 MD04246 1314.6180 21.95 STREET RENOVATION 92610 063004 1,470.50 SOU& BLACK DIRT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 92610 28.00 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 4,014.70 063004 5913.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT 4,100.00 92610 063004 1643.6543 2,555.33 GENERAL TURF CARE 92426 071104 5,115.45 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 92269 98.00 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 19,174.88 689249 261833 7/2212004 YORK SELLING 103202 MARSTON, ELLIOTT 689250 5842.5515 24.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 92272 687232 24.00 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 261834 7/22/2004 686735 100870 MATRX COST OF GOODS SOLQ MIX VERNON SELLING 180.48 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 180.48 92275 261835 7/22/2004 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 112360 MAY, DOUG 92276 688969 99.96 UNIFORM REIMBURSEMENT YORK SELLING 92631 99.96 5842.5514 CITY OF EDINA 7/21/2004 10:35:15 Council Check Register Page- 18 7/22/2004 - 7/22/2004 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 92578 163074 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 92318 MD04246 1314.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS STREET RENOVATION 92610 063004 5422.6543 SOU& BLACK DIRT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 92610 063004 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 92610 063004 5913.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT DISTRIBUTION 92610 063004 1643.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT GENERAL TURF CARE 92426 071104 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 92269 686734 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 92270 689249 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 92271 689250 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 92272 687232 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 92273 686735 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLQ MIX VERNON SELLING 92274 686733 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 92275 687233 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 92276 688969 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 92631 691613 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 92632 691614 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 92656 071904 1490.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PUBLIC HEALTH 92657 857690 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 92611 071404 5630.6201 LAUNDRY CENTENNIAL LAKES CITY OF EDINA 7/21/2004 10:35:15 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 19 7/22/2004 -7/22/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 261836 7/2212004 106603 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS 2,104.50 JULY 22 TRIP 92592 071304 1628.6103.07 TRIPS PROF SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 2,104.50 261837 712212004 101327 MEDICINE SHOW MUSIC CO., THE 600.00 ENTERTAINMENT 92381 071204 5120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 600.00 261838 712212004 101483 MENARDS 336.11 LUMBER, NAILS 92217 35215 5422.6577 LUMBER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 63.29 TIMBERS 92218 35679 5422.6577 LUMBER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 110.76- CREDIT 92219 35222 5422.6577 LUMBER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 52.45 LUMBER 92612 43447 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 61.15 BOLTS, NUTS, FILE SET 92613 42203 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 402.24 261839 7/22/2004 101987 MENARDS 118.75 PAINTING SUPPLIES 92535 99010 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 305.55 SUMP PUMPS 92536 885 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 424.30 261840 712212004 103060 MERCURY WASTE SOLUTIONS 305.48 LAMP DISPOSAL 92375 208248 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 305.48 261841 7122/2004 100882 MERIT SUPPLY 337.71 CLEANERS 92537 64882 5421.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES GRILL 266.84 CHEMICALS, CLEANING PADS 92614 64772 5620.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 604.55 261842 712212004 116660 MERRIAM, KIM 78.00 PROGRAM REFUND 92319 071204 1600.4390.02 TENNIS PROGRAM PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 78.00 261843 7/22/2004 101891 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY 151.07 BALLFIELD SUPPLIES 92320 76618 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 151.07 261844 712212004 100885 METRO SALES INC . 388.80 PCU 92579 29691A 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 388.80 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/21/2004 10:35:15 Council Check Register Page - 20 7/22/2004 —7/22/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 261845 7/2212004 116377 METRO SYSTEMS 291.38 FILE CABINET 92593 35190 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 884.70 OFFICE EQUIPMENT 92658 35275 1495.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT INSPECTIONS 1 ,176.08 261846 712212004 100886 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 2,598.75 JULY 2004 92220 063004 1495.4307 SAC CHARGES INSPECTIONS 2,596.75 261847 7/22/2004 100887 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONME 235,116.40 SEWER SERVICE 92376 777879 5922.6302 SEWER SERVICE METRO SEWER TREATMENT 235,116.40 261848 7/2212004 116712 METROPOLITAN MEDIA GROUP INC.- 700.00 EDINA MAGAZINE AD 92538 152623 5410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 700.00 261849 7/22/2004 102508 METZGER, MAURE ANN 83.53 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 92410 071104 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 83.53 261850 7122/2004 116696 MGE UPS SYSTEMS 656.98 UPS MAINTENANCE 92221 251464 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL 656.98 261861 7/22/2004 116753 MGS PROFESSIONAL BUILDING MAIN 3,290.00 WINDOW CLEANING 92659 17336 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 3,290.00 261852 7/2212004 100891 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. 423.11 ASPHALT 92222 72201MB 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE 11,811.46 ASPHALT 92222 72201MB 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 726.95 ASPHALT 92223 72235MB 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 474.03 ASPHALT 92368 72245MB 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE 3,417.82 ASPHALT 92368 72245MB 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 16,853.37 261853 712212004 100692 MIDWEST COCA -COLA EAGAN 278.00 92277 80804088 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 175.00 92278 82513331 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 453.00 CITY OF EDINA 7121/2004 10:35:15 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 21 7/22/2004 - 7/22/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 261864 712212004 101356 MIDWEST FENCE & MFG COMPANY 1,463.33 FENCING 92224 110561 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 1,463.33 FENCING 92224 110561 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1,463.34 FENCING 92224 110561 5422.6251 SHARED MAINTENANCE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 4,390.00 261855 712212004 103186 MIDWEST FUELS - 245.85 FUEL 92225 22004 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 245.85 261856 712212004 102873 MILLER, SUSAN 179.55 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 92615 071604 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 240.16 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 92615 071604 1627.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 419.71 - 261857 7122/2004 102582 MINN DEPT. OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 40.00 BOILER INSPECTION 92377 B42351R0420831 5311.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POOL OPERATION 40.00 261868 712212004 100913 MINNEAPOLIS SUBURBAN SEWER & W 680.00 WATER SERVICE REPAIR 92616 32531 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 680.00 261859 7/22/2004 101376 MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPMENT 406.74 HYDRAULIC PARTS 92226 0148780 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION 1,682.26 HYDRANT & PARTS 92617 0150002 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION 2,089.00 261860 7/2212004 112908 MINNESOTA ROADWAYS CO. 97.77 ASPHALT EMULSION 92227 45837 1301.6406. GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 97.77 261861 712212004 101410 MINNESOTA STATE BOARD OF ELECT 25.00 ELECTRICAL PERMIT 92321 071404 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 47.50 MAINT FEE- JULY,AUG,SEPT 92322 7604 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING . 47.50 MAINT FEE- JULY,AUG,SEPT 92322 7604 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDINGS 47.50 MAINT FEE- JULY,AUG,SEPT 92322 7604 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 47.50 MAINT FEE- JULY,AUG,SEPT 92322 7604 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 47.50 MAINT FEE- JULY,AUG,SEPT 92322 7604 5820.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH STREET GENERAL 47.50 MAINT FEE- JULY,AUG,SEPT 92322 7604 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 47.50 MAINT FEE- JULY,AUG,SEPT 92322 7604 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/21/2004 10:35:15 Council Check Register Page - 22 7/22/2004 — 7/22/2004 Cheek # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 25.00 ELECTRICAL PERMIT 92323 071304 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 25.00 ELECTRICAL PERMIT 92324 07 -14-04 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 407.50 261862 7122/2004 100899 MINNESOTA STATE TREASURER 5,336.04 JUNE 2004 92228 063004 1495.4380 SURCHARGE INSPECTIONS 5,336.04 261863 712212004 101144 MINNESOTA UC FUND 7,631.79 UNEMPLOYMENT COMP 92445 071304 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 7,631.79 261864 7/22/2004 102303 MINNESOTA VALLEY LANDSCAPE INC 48,450.00 CITY HALLPOLICE FACILITY 92229 9951C 4400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CITY HALUPOLICE BUILDING 48,450.00 261866 7/22/2004 112956 MOHAMOUD, MOHAMED 55.00 PROGRAM STAFF 92618 071404 1629.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 55.00 261866 7122/2004 106190 MOORE, MARY CARROLL 34.13 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 92411 071104 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 34.13 261867 7/22/2004 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 158.20 SUMP PUMPS 92325 420297 -00 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 153.89 FUSES 92619 410115 -00 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 312.09 261868 712212004 114343 MULLEN, JANET 37.38 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 92412 071104 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 37.38 261869 7/22/2004 110522 MUNICIPAL BUILDERS INC. 300.00 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 6 92364 071404 05423.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WELL #14 REHAB 6367 DEWEY HILL 33,011.85 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 6 92364 071404 05428.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WELL #19 REHAB 33,311.85 261670 712212004 106662 NET LITIN DISTRIBUTORS 74.55 HELIUM TANKS 92382 20521 5120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 74.55 CITY OF EDINA 7/21/2004 10:35:15 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 23 7/22/2004 - 7/22/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 261871 712212004 116703 NEWCASTLE REFRACTORIES CO. 2,193.01 24 x 12 SLABS 92383 843881RI 5111.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 2,193.01 261872 712212004 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 190.00 92472 26603 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 190.00 261673 712212004 111483 NICHOLSON, JEFFREY 65.00 PIANO TUNING 92620 070204 5610.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT ED-ADMINISTRATION 65.00 261874 712212004 104350 NIKE USA INC. 326.78 GOLF BAGS 92539 107428669 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 54.88 GOLF BAG 92540 107428670 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 381.66 261875 7/2212004 116697 NORBLOM PLUMBING 17.60 PERMIT REFUND 92230 ED027245 1495.4112 PLUMBING PERMITS INSPECTIONS 17.60 261876 7/22/2004 105672 NORTHERN POWER PRODUCTS INC. 52.53 WIRE SET 92231 143132 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 52.53 - 261877 712212004 103133 NORTHERN TOOL & EQUIPMENT 28.15 COUPLERS 92541 10271367 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 28.15 261878 7122/2004 100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY 93.12 PENCILS, SKETCH PADS 92384 30105700 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 134.94 CANVAS PANELS 92385 30104200 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 228.06 261879 712212004 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 260.41 SAFETY HARNESSES 92232 288576 5913.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTION 189.78- CREDIT 92233 288531 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 70.63 261880 7/22/2004 106230 OSVOG, KYLE CLAYTON 39.00 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 92413 071104 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 39.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 198.00 CITY OF EDINA 92326 071204 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL Council Check Register 198.00 7/22/2004 - 7/22/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 261881 712212004 100939 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC. 48.75 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 94.64 COOKIES 92580 68715343 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 94.64 48.75 261882 712212004 101530 PANCAKE, CHAR 261885 712212004 116704 PARSONS, JOAN B 39.00 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 92414 071104 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 39.00 35.75 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 92420 261883 712212004 ART WORK SOLD 100941 PARK NICOLLET CLINIC 7/21/2004 10:35:15 Page - 24 Business Unit POOL CONCESSIONS ART CENTER REVENUES 198.00 EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS 92326 071204 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 198.00 261884 712212004 116603 PARKER, KATHY 48.75 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 92423 071104 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 48.75 261885 712212004 116704 PARSONS, JOAN B 35.75 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 92420 071104 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 35.75 261886 7/2212004 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 39.90 92279 8039625 -IN 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,949.00 92473 8041415 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 931.00 92474 8041412 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VINE YORK SELLING 480.00 92475 8041413 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 819.80 92476 8041414 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 780.00 92477 8041590 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 4,999.70 261887 712212004 110832 PC2 SOLUTIONS, INC. 420.00 COMPUTER SERVICES 92581 61904008 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 420.00 261888 7/22/2004 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 136.50 92446 66384601 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 398.85 92542 67130347 5630.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES 991.40 92543 64058091 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 334.80 92544 65269515 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 1,861.55 261889 712212004 100946 PERA R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation 78,205.89 PPEND 7 /13/04 78,205.89 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7/22/2004 -7/22/2004 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 92660 071604 1000.2023 Subledger Account Description P.E.R.A. PAYABLE 7/21/2004 10:35:15 Page - 25 Business Unit GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 261890 712212004 100948 PERKINS LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS 5,798.50 COMPLETION OF TEE #17 92234 PO 6130 5422.6251 SHARED MAINTENANCE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 5,798.50 261891 712212004 116718 PHELPS PEARSON, SUSAN 75.00 AWARD OF EXCELLENCE 92560 071304 5120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 75.00 261893 7122/2004 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 843.95 92280 2089487 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,492.29 92281 2089484 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 46.90 92282 2089485 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 163.40 92283 2089486 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,428.74 92284 2089479 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,026.49 92285 2089480 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 241.78- 92286 3301002 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 30.32- 92287 3301501 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 22,20- 92288 3301003 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 463.85 92352 2089483 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,354.15 92478 2092244 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 584.80 92479 2092236 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,025.85 92480 2092239 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 323.20 92481 2092237 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 44.85 92482 2092238 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 62.88- 92483 3301502 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 17,33- 92484 3301433 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 14.05- 92485 3301325 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,429.30 92633 2092242 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 78814 92634 2092240 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,100.63 92635 2092241 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 13,727.98 261894 7/2212004 106876 PICKERMAN'S SOUP AND SANDWICHE 161.79 BOX LUNCHES 92386 400 161.79 5120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 261896 7/2212004 106071 PLAYWORKS OF PRIOR LAKE 8.00 .DAILY ADM REFUND 92564 071504 5301.4541 GENERAL ADMISSIONS AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES 8.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7121/2004 10:35:15 Council Check Register Page- 26 7/22/2004 - 7/22/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 261896 7122/2004 100961 POSTMASTER 591.00 ABOUT BUSINESS POSTAGE 92623 071604 2210.6123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 591.00 261897 712212004 100962 PRECISION BUSINESS SYSTEMS 392.99 CASSETTE TRANSCRIBER 92594 077477 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 392.99 261898 71221200.4 101032 PRINT SHOP, THE 755.09 NEWSLETTER 92595 19394 1628.6575 PRINTING SENIOR CITIZENS 755.09 261899 7/2212004 100968 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 1,421.50 92289 916200 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 630.48 92353 918079 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,183.27 92486 918075 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,484.85 92487 918081 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5,720.10 261900 7/2212004 100971 QUALITY WINE 7.65- 92290 426048 -00 5840.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 382.60 92290 426048 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 6.56- 92354 427552 -00 5820.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS BOTH STREET GENERAL 665.20 92354 427552 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2.41- 92355 427661 -00 5820.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS 50TH STREET GENERAL 244.70 92355 427661 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE BOTH ST SELLING 23.42- 92356 427778-00 5820.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS 50TH STREET GENERAL 1,182.50 92356 427778-00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR BOTH ST SELLING 7.53- 92488 427660 -00 5840.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 760.71 92488 427660 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 24.62- 92489 427583-00 5840.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 2,499.98 92489 427583-00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 34.72- 92490 427839-00 5840.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 1,751.65 92490 427839-00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 15.25- 92491 427393 -00 5860.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 1,545.93 92491 427393 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 12,10. 92492 426986-00 5860.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 1,226,92 92492 426986-00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,73 92493 427735 -00 5860.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 237.61 92493 427735 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 0,358.81 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7122/2004 — 7/22/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 261901 7/22/2004 103930 QUIST, SUSAN 49.97 CLOTHING REIMBURSEMENT 92596 070704 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 7/21/2004 10:35:15 Page - 27 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET GENERAL SUPPLIES FIREWORKS GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ART WORK SOLD. ART CENTER REVENUES BUILDINGS ART CENTER BALANCE SHEET DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD VANVALKENBURG COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 49.97 261902 712212004 112662 RADIO SHACK CORPORATION 42.56 REPAIR PARTS 92327 176220 1646.6406 42.56 261903 712212004 100287 RAMSEY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPART 300.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 92597 071604 1000.2055 300.00 261904 7/22/2004 102637 RES SPECIALTY PYROTECHNICS 13,000.00 FIREWORKS DISPLAY 92235 5331 1505.6406 13.000.00 261905 712212004 100842 RETAIL SERVICES 10.64 CHANGER KIT 92236 06220400307399 1400.6406 10.64 261906 7/2212004 102095 RICKERT, DAVID 74.75 ARTWORK SOLD AT EAC 92415 071104 5101.4413 74.75 261907 7122/2004 105131 ROOF SPEC INC. 650.50 ROOF DESIGN SERVICES 92447 50399 5100.1720 650.50 261908 7122/2004 105534 ROTARY CLUB OF EDINAIMORNINGSI 195.00 DUES 92237 142 1120.6105. 195.00 261909 7122/2004 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 184.41 CONCESSION PRODUCT 92328 071304 4075.5510 366.99 FOOD 92545 7113/2004 5421.5510 551.40 261910 7122/2004 100305 SARA LEE COFFEE & TEA 431.97 COFFEE 92546 8721225 5421.5510 431.97 GENERAL SUPPLIES 7/21/2004 10:35:15 Page - 27 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET GENERAL SUPPLIES FIREWORKS GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ART WORK SOLD. ART CENTER REVENUES BUILDINGS ART CENTER BALANCE SHEET DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD VANVALKENBURG COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 7/21/2004 10:35:15 Page - 28 Business Unit MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE ART CENTER REVENUES 1,695.19 KILN EQUIPMENT 92387 CITY OF EDINA 5100.1730 R55CKREG LOG20000 ART CENTER BALANCE SHEET 1,695.19 Council Check Register 7122/2004 101342 SOCCER EXPRESS 7/22/2004 - 7/22/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 261911 712212004 100990 SCHARBER & SONS 432.00 300.33 J.P. HOOD 92329 2039145 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 101002 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS INC 300.33 261912 712212004 100301 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 150686 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 415.35 LIQUID FERTILIZER 92238 400029SI 5422.6540 FERTILIZER 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 2,009.12 FUNGICIDE 92239 400028SI 5431.6545 CHEMICALS 92357 152365 2,424.47 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 261913 712212004 92358 116605 SLATTERY, JEAN 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 13.00 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 92421 071104 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 13.00 11.50 92360 261914 7122/2004 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 103339 SMITHSHARPE FIRE BRICK SUPPLY 7/21/2004 10:35:15 Page - 28 Business Unit MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE ART CENTER REVENUES 1,695.19 KILN EQUIPMENT 92387 25252 5100.1730 OFFICE FURN & EQUIPMENT ART CENTER BALANCE SHEET 1,695.19 261916 7122/2004 101342 SOCCER EXPRESS 432.00 T- SHIRTS 92661 0276 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 432.00 261916 712212004 101002 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS INC 5,137.00 92291 150686 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 27,10 92292 150685 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,379.35 92357 152365 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 65.70 92358 152366 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 645.80 92359 152360 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 11.50 92360 152361 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 57.20 92547 345690 5430.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 7,323.65 261917 712212004 110977 SOW, ADAMA 109.20 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 92416 071104 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 109.20 261918 712212004 104876 SPECTRUM COMMERCIAL SERVICES 404.70 AUTO IMPOUND FORMS 92598 401603-01 1400.6575 PRINTING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 404.70 261919 712212004 101004 SPS COMPANIES 66.29 ACTUATOR CARTRIDGES 92330 S1037658.001 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 66.29 CITY OF EDINA 7/21/2004 10:35:15 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 29 7/27/2004 —7/22/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 261920 712212004 110976 STAGES THEATRE CO. 500.00 FINAL PAYMENT 92621 67 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 500.00 261921 712212004 101007 STAR TRIBUNE 27.95 SUBSCRIPTION 92378 070504 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 27.95 261922 712212004 116706 STEPHENS, RICHARD 146.25 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 92424 071104 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 146.25 261923 712212004 116719 STEWART, BRIAN 75.00 AWARD OF EXCELLENCE 92561 071304 5120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 75.00 261924 7/2212004 101766 STROH, STEVE 487.00 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 92599 070604 1400.6104 CONFERENCES 6 SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 487.00 261926 712212004 102140 SUN MOUNTAIN SPORTS INC. 731.26 SPEED CARTS 92548 489595 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 731.26 261926 7/22/2004 116706 SYME, DIANE 65.00 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 92422 071104 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 40.00 AWARD OF MERIT 92562 071304 5120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 105.00 261927 712212004 104932 TAYLOR MADE 55.42 MERCHANDISE 92549 07228297 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 55.42 261928 712212004 116726 TECH CENTER 62.22 PEDAL 92600 TC109827 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 62.22 261929 7/2212004 113649 TENNIS WEST 2,000.00 BASKETBALL COURT WORK 92331 04 -616 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS 8 HARD SURFACE 2,000.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/21/2004 10:35:15 Council Check Register Page - 30 7/22/2004 -7/2212004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 261930 7122/2004 112248 TERMINIX 85.00 PEST CONTROL 92332 8040785 5311.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POOL OPERATION 85.00 261931 712212004 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 84.15 92293 339915 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,469.30 92294 339914 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 123.05 92550 340224 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 267.00 92551 13272 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 2,943.50 261932 712212004 103366 TIME WARNER CABLE 104.33 CABLE TV ADVERTISING 92369 141864 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 104.33 CABLE TV ADVERTISING 92369 141864 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 104.34 CABLE TV ADVERTISING 92369 141864 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 313.00 261933 712212004 101474 TITLEIST 813.79 GOLF BALLS 92552 1359312 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 813.79 261934 712212004 103163 TREUTING, KRISTEN 96.53 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 92417 071104 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 96.53 261936 712212004 101042 TRIARCO 269.89 PAPER, INK, BRAYERS 92388 838577 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 104.48 PLAYGROUND SUPPLIES 92662 693617 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 374.37 261936 712212004 101047 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO 189.89 DOOR REPAIR 92553 219481 5630.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES 189.89 261937 7/2212004 100363 U.S. BANK 50.00 4833 4960 0545 2508 92240 070604 1120.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ADMINISTRATION 17.99 USB CABLE 92241 JUL 6 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 84.00 BOOKS 92241 JUL 6 1504.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION 54.71 PHONE BATTERIES 92448 071404 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 223.65 UNIFORMS 92448 071404 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 593.24 SAFETY LUNCH - DAVANNIS 92448 071404 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,023.59 CITY OF EDINA 7/21/2004 10:35:15 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register. Page - 31 7/22/2004 - 7122/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 261938 7/22/2004 101051 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 735.40 92601 063004 1419.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE RESERVE PROGRAM 3,405.87 92601 063004 1400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 4,498.63 92601 063004 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 8,639.90 261939 7122/2004 100371 UNITED RENTALS 9,877.28 CURBING MACHINE 92242 41549487 -001 1305.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 1,991.45 CURBFORMS, LUTES 92243 41549541 -001 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 11,868.73 261940 7/2212004 101908 US FOODSERVICE INC 249.95 LINERS, TISSUE 92244 33183608 5311.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 372.51 CONCESSION PRODUCT 92244 33183608 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 61.14 CLEANING PRODUCTS 92333 33184588 5311.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 500.17. CONCESSION PRODUCT 92333 33184588 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 437.03 CONCESSION PRODUCT 92334 33185731 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 477.97 CONCESSION PRODUCT 92582 33188205 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 2,098.77 261941 712212004 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 227.64 CAN LINERS 92335 536738 1645.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LITTER REMOVAL 278.23 CAN LINERS 92336 537234 1645.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LITTER REMOVAL 505.87 261942 7/22/2004 106308 VEITH, MICHELLE 47.00 LUNCHES 92622 92008 1629.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 47.00 261943 7122/2004 102886 WAGNER GREENHOUSES INC. 113.43 PLANTINGS 92337 110264 1644.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES TREES & MAINTENANCE 113.43 261944 7/2212004 103466 WASTE MANAGEMENT - SAVAGE MN 35.00 92449 2714261 5821.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 40.30 92449 2714261 1481.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK FIRE STATION 41.52 92449 2714261 5111.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 64.03 92449 2714261 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 70.52 92449 2714261 1470.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 76.52 92449 2714261 5841.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK OCCUPANCY 76.62 92449 2714261 5861.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL VERNON OCCUPANCY R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Vendor % Explanation Council Check Register 50TH ST SELLING 81.52 7/22/2004 - 7/22/2004 5862.5513 90.30 Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 155.21 2714261 5430.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 160.82 2714261 1628.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 178.34 2714261 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 179.55 2714261 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 234.91 2714261 5311.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 239.29 2714261 1551.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 305.71 2714261 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 305.71 2714261 5511.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 369.69 2714261 1301.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 482.15 2714261 1552.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 3,187.71 2714261 261945 712212004 92449 116516 WELDON, KEN 5620.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 152.75 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 152.75 261946 7/2212004 101077 WEST WELD SUPPLY CO. 155.15 WELDING SUPPLIES 836.95 WELDING TOOLS 992.10 261947 7/2212004 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 656.55 461.70 1,876.90 2,995.15 261948 712212004 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 814.00 809.45 662.10 2,285.55 261949 7/22/2004 102019 WOIT, DIANE 32.50 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 32.50 261960 7/22/2004 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 599.50 389.00 92418 071104 92370 63445 92450 59118 92494 31556 -00 92495 31627 -00 92636 31628 -00 92295 100030 92496 100557 92497 100556 92419 071104 92296 152398 92498 152623 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 7/21/2004 10:35:15 Page - 32 Business Unit RICHARDS GOLF COURSE SENIOR CITIZENS LITTER REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL POOL OPERATION CITY HALL GENERAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS GENERAL MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING CLUB HOUSE EDINBOROUGH PARK ART CENTER REVENUES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENTENNIAL LAKES 5842.5513 .CITY OF EDINA YORK SELLING 5822.5513 Council Check Register 50TH ST SELLING 5862.5513 7/22/2004 - 7/22/2004 5862.5513 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 92449 2714261 5430.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 92449 2714261 1628.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 92449 2714261 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 92449 2714261 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 92449 2714261 5311.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 92449 2714261 1551.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 92449 2714261 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 92449 2714261 5511.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 92449 2714261 1301.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 92449 2714261 1552.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 92449 2714261 5420.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 92449 2714261 5620.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 92418 071104 92370 63445 92450 59118 92494 31556 -00 92495 31627 -00 92636 31628 -00 92295 100030 92496 100557 92497 100556 92419 071104 92296 152398 92498 152623 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 7/21/2004 10:35:15 Page - 32 Business Unit RICHARDS GOLF COURSE SENIOR CITIZENS LITTER REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL POOL OPERATION CITY HALL GENERAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS GENERAL MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING CLUB HOUSE EDINBOROUGH PARK ART CENTER REVENUES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENTENNIAL LAKES 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 162.5513. COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation 261961 712212004 101726 XCEL ENERGY 1,188.38 1 .1.. e 261962 712212004 104.00 357.88 733.56 79.88 1,275.32 261963 7/2212004 345.00 345.00 984,434.31 100568 XEROX CORPORATION JUNE USAGE JUNE USAGE JUNE USAGE STAPLES 101091 ZIEGLER INC GENERATOR MAINTENANCE Grand Total CITY OF EDINA 7/21/2004 10:35:15 Council Check Register Page - 33 7/22/2004 — 7%22/2004 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 92637 152660 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 92245 0901769168189 5111.6185 92338 1916215721190 5630.6185 92379 1746 - 737629177 5913.6185 92389 003400764 5110.6151 92602 003400612 1400.6230 92663 003584738 1550.6151 92664 188156220 1550.6406 92665 E3809704 1551.6180 Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 984,434.31 Total Payments 984,434.31 LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT CENTENNIAL LAKES DISTRIBUTION EQUIPMENT RENTAL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT RENTAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/21/2004 10:40:32 Council Check Summary Page - 1 7/2212004 - 7/22/2004 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 213,502.35 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 45,434.55 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 76,011.19 05100 ART CENTER FUND 11,878.90 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 5,802.94 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 40,586.46 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 361.89 05600 EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND 15,916.93 05800 LIQUOR FUND 121,762.02 05900 UTILITY FUND 438,603.21 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 14,375.50 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 198.37 Report Totals 984,434.31 We Ootff m to the bast of our knowbftA and belief, that these dain comply M an aster respects with the rW1r9mwft Of the City of Edina puF-CIF-10sinp ides and �ooedurss 25C 1 R55CKREG LOG20000 7/2912004 100614 ACE SUPPLY CO. INC., CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 45.03. FILTERS 92802 586234 1330.6406 7/2912004 -7/29/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 261964 712912004 261957 102403 AAA LAMBERTS LANDSCAPE PRODUCT 100615 ACME WINDOW CLEANING INC 237.49 BLACK DIRT 92801 16278 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RAMP GLASS 237.49 053399 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP 261955 712912004 1,054.35 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 65.24 7/2912004 92666 442540 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 87.96 92961 442838 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 93020 84.52 5111.6250 92962 443855 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 21.30 93.18 93021 92963 442541 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 109.20 45.01 93120 442836 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 92.68 261959 93121 443848 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 65.96 93122 443853 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX PRINTING 59.96 C361001 93123 442837 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 7/28/2004 9:27:44 Page- 1 Business Unit GENERAL MAINTENANCE 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 261956 7/2912004 100614 ACE SUPPLY CO. INC., 45.03. FILTERS 92802 586234 1330.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TRAFFIC SIGNALS 45.03 261957 7129/2004 100615 ACME WINDOW CLEANING INC 1,054.35 RAMP GLASS 92803 053399 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP 1,054.35 261968 7/2912004 106162 ADT SECURITY SERVICES 23.71 ALARM SERVICE 93020 75701443 5111.6250 ALARM SERVICE ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 21.30 REPLACE BATTERIES 93021 76128858 5111.6250 ALARM SERVICE ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 45.01 261959 7129/2004 100621 ALBINSON REPROGRAPHICS 233.02 PRINTING 92766 C361001 5300.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET 233.02 261960 7129/2004 100676 ALL SAFE FIRE & SECURITY 194.62 CHEMICAL CERTIFICATION 92894 60601 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 194.62 261961 712912004 100867 ALSTAD, MARIAN 1,044.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 93080 071904 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,044.00 261962 7129/2004 100675 AMERA -CHEM INC.. 39.95 DRUG ID BIBLE 92895 25993 1400.6405 BOOKS & PAMPHLETS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA .7/28/2004 9:27:44 Council Check Register Page - 2 7/29/2004 - 7/29/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor/ Explanation PO # Doc No. Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 39.95 261963 712912004 100595 ANOKA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE 100.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 93117 072604 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 100.00 261964 7/29/2004 102172 APPERTS FOODSERVICE 476.00 FOOD 92767 230491 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 123.75 FOOD 93022 232475 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 599.75 261965 7129/2004 102646 AQUA LOGIC INC. 165.37 POOL. CHEMICALS 92728 25264 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 65.50 POOL CLEANER 92896 25301 5620.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 2,385.60 POOL HEATER 92897 25249 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 388.67 CALHYPO, CLEANER 92898 25239 5620.6545 CHEMICALS EDINBOROUGH PARK 91.75 DE, ACID 92899 25194 5620.6545 CHEMICALS EDINBOROUGH PARK 3,096.89 261966 712912004 101977 ARCH WIRELESS 198.50 PAGER RENTAL 92804. N6339611G 1470.6151 EQUIPMENT. RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 198.50 261967 712912004 113896 ART TIME 135.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 93081 071904 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 135.00 261968 712912004 103857 ASATO, SHEILA 384.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 93082 071904 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 384.00 261969 7/2912004 102972 AT&T 74.53 MICROWAVES & PIZZA OVEN 92768 071904 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 148.96 MICROWAVES & PIZZA OVEN 92768 071904 5860.6406 GENERAL.SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 223.49 261970 7/2912004 101964 AUGIE'S INC. 87.52 FOOD 93023 4773 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 87.52 261971 7/29/2004 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 2,827.00 92964 30142200. '842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING CITY OF EDINA 7/28/2u- 9:27:44 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 3' 7/29/2004 - 7/29/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 819.00 92965 30142600 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,242.00 92966 30097800 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 111.00 92967 30114600 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 146.00 93124 30142300 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 145.04 93125 38703800 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 180.97 93126 38681200 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 23.00 93127 38703900 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 51.74 93127 38703900 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 310.00 93128 30142100 5822.5513 COST'OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5,855.75 261972 712912004 103406 BENNEROTTE MARKETING AGENCY 139.25 .SHOWER PARTS 92901 59425 5620.6530 REPAIR PARTS EDINBOROUGH PARK 139.25 261973 7/2912004 108670 BERNER, JIM 150.00 PERFORMANCE 812/04 92902 072304 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 150.00 261974 7/2912004 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 35.26 OFFICE SUPPLIES 92729 3089660 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES . ADMINISTRATION 37.26 OFFICE SUPPLIES 92805 3060410 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 72.52 261975 7129/2004 100650 BEST ACCESS SYSTEMS 15.73 KEYS 92806 MN- 338844 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 15.73 261976 7129/2004 102392 BLACK, STEVE 267.00 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 92903 072304 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 267.00 261977 7/2912004 100663 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE 36.80 PETTY CASH 93024 072304 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 38.09 PETTY CASH 93024 072304 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 53.25 PETTY CASH 93024 072304 5422.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MAINT OF COURSE 8 GROUNDS 128.14 261978 712912004 106661 BREEZY POINT RESORT 326.00 SEPT 22 -24 CONFERENCE 92904 072304 1490.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PUBLIC HEALTH 326.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 MT99509 1400.6406 92731 CITY OF EDINA 1400.6406 92810 NT37859 1470.6513 92907 NVO0694 Council Check Register 7/29/2004 -7/29/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 261979 712912004 100667 BROCK WHITE COMPANY 110.56 SAW BLADES 92808 11220466 -00 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 110.56 261980 7/29/2004 101241 BROWN TRAFFIC PRODUCTS 1,597.50 LIGHTS 92807 164939 1330.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1,597.50 261981 712912004 100669 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC. 408.75 BALLFIELD LIME 92809 071504 1642.6542 INFIELD MIXTURE 408.75 261982 7/29/2004 100671 BUDGET LIGHTING 304.26 REPAIR BULBS 92905 00255719 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS - 304.26 261983 7/29/2004 103952 CAFARELLI, MICOL 7/28/2004 9:27:44 Page- 4 Business Unit GENERAL MAINTENANCE TRAFFIC SIGNALS FIELD MAINTENANCE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 625.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 93083 071904 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 625.00 261984 712912004 100004 CAMCO LUBRICANTS 357.84 OIL 92906 050913 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 357.84 261986 7/2912004 102046 CAMPE, HARRIET 618.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 93084 071904 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 618.00 261986 7/29/2004 103376 CARLSON MARKETING GROUP 109.39 PARADE SHIRTS 93025 1129575 1627.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 109.39 261987 712912004 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 261988 7/29/2004 429.99 420.00- 96.98 662.42 769.39 102372. CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 40GB UNIV INTERNAL RETURN (FREIGHT CHG) DRUM KIT TONER, DRUM KITS 92667 38893 5822.5513 92730 MT99509 1400.6406 92731 CMMZ91181 1400.6406 92810 NT37859 1470.6513 92907 NVO0694 1400.6406 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CITY OF EDINA 7/28/2t,., -, 9:27:44 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 5 7/29/2004 - 7/29/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 261989 712912004 112661 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 42.67 93026 071604 5430.6186 HEAT RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 1,684.47 93027 072104 1551.6186 HEAT CITY HALL GENERAL 37.28 93028 JUL16 7411.6186 HEAT PSTF OCCUPANCY 185.59 93029 JULY16 7411.6186 HEAT PSTF OCCUPANCY 1,950.01 261990 7/2912004 116767 CHOI, DAVID 315.00 PROGRAM REFUND 93030 072304 1600.4390.15 GEN ADAPTIVE REC PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 315.00 261991 7/2912004 116771 CIRCUS JUVENTAS 450.00 ADVERTISING 93095 071904 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 450.00 _ 261992 712912004 103040 CITY PAGES 260.00 ADVERTISING 93031 100065136 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 260.00 261993 7/29/2004 116304 CLAY, DON 50.00 VIDEO EDITING 92769 070904 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 20.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTOR 93085 071904 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 70.00 261994 7/29/2004 100693 COMMERCIAL FURNITURE BROKERS 186.38 FF PEDS, WORKSURFACE 92811 00089543 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 186.38 261995 7/29/2004 106229 COMMUNITY HEALTH CONFERENCE 110.00 SEPT 22 -24 CONFERENCE 92908 072304 1490.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PUBLIC HEALTH 110.00 261996 712912004 102490 COMPUSA INC. 581.48 PRINTERS, INK 93032 401103763, 5125.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT MEDIA STUDIO 581.48 261997 7/29/2004 101323 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS 88.48 EAR PLUGS 92732 02359037 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 171.97 GLOVES, TAPE 92812 02352943 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 345.12 GLOVES, EARPLUGS 92813 02354650 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 311.17 SAFETY GLASSES, GLOVES 92814 02356616 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CITY OF EDINA 7/28/2004 9:27:44 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 6 7/29/2004 - 7/29/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 68.96 HIGHWAY WARNING TRIANGLES 92815 02356957 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 985.70 261998 712912004 100695 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO. 691.32 CLAY 93033 INV000006205 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 691.32 261999 712912004 104948 CONTINENTAL RESEARCH CORPORATI 195.40 DEGREASER 92816 205387 -CRC -1 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 195.40 262000 712912004 102249 CRITTER CONTROL 186.38 REMOVE BIRD NESTS 92733 43096 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 186.38 262001 712912004 100402 CROW WING COUNTY ATTY OFFICE 85.00 REGISTRATION REFUND 93034 072104 7401.4390 REGISTRATION FEES PSTF REVENUE 85.00 262002 712912004 116755 CSI ERGONOMICS 261.62 KEYBOARD 92735 INV013872 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,594.69 WORKSTATION ITEMS 92736 INV013868 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,135.30 CHAIRS 92909 INV013907 1400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2,991.61 262003 7/2912004 100700 CURTIS 1000 1,134.23 ENVELOPES 93035 63020001 5910.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL (BILLING) 1,134.23 262004 7/29/2004 100701 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO. 35.58 RIM, CAP 92817 127545 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 35.58 262005 712912004 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING 2,908.95 92668 264189 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 85.60 92669 264186 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,967.93 92670 272517 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 52.40 92671 272518 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,717.62 92792 .273471 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 623.75 92793 273476 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,587.35 93129 273467 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 13.40 93130 273468 "862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING CITY OF EDINA 7/28/200x. 9:27:44 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 7 7/29/2004 - 7/29/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 10,957.00 262006 712912004 100720 DENNYS 6TH AVE. BAKERY 55.77 BAKERY 92770 172323 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 54.36 BAKERY 92771 172376 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 54.45 BAKERY 92772 172405 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 138.13 BAKERY 93036 172488 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 24.42 BAKERY 93037 172452 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 75.61 BAKERY 93038 172651 5421.5510 COSTDF GOODS SOLD GRILL 113.39 BAKERY 93039 172657 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 516.13 262007 712912004 100662 DIETRICHSON, BILL 336.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 93086 071904 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 336.00 262008 712912004 100420 DOGGIE WALK BAGS 287.00 DOGGIE BAGS 92818 200407156 1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 287.00 262009 7129/2004 116763 DOUGHMAN, CAROL 420.00 LAWN REPAIR 92910 072204 5932.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL STORM SEWER 420.00 262010 7/29/2004 104868 DUNN, MATT 50.00 FAMILY JAMBOREE 92911 072204 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 50.00 262011 7/29/2004 100739 EAGLE WINE 633.84 92968 921306 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 336.62 92969 921301 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 10.71- 92970 644395 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,450.10 93131 921298 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 590.55 93132 918295 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,000.40 262012 7/29/2004 100741 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 7,100.35. 92672 322636 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 83.70 92773 212503 5430.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 1,701.95 92971 322711 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 357.00 93040 13103 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 15.00 93133 322713 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/28/2004 9:27:44 Council Check Register Page - 8 7/29/2004 -7/2912004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 4,354.45 93134 322712 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 10.70 93135 322731 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 6,850.95 93136 322730 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 20,474.10 262013 7129/2004 106467 EDINA CRIME PREVENTION FUND 2,210.00 ART FAIR VISA CHARGES 92734 072004 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 2,210.00 262014 7129/2004 101341 EDINA FIREFIGHTER'S RELIEF ASS 131.68 CABLE INSTALLATION FEE 92819 072004 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 131.68 262015 712912004 100734 EDWARD KRAEMER & SONS INC. 587.36 GRAVEL 9.2820 150751 5422.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 587.36 262016 712912004 116448 EGAN OIL COMPANY 231.30 GOLF CAR FUEL 92821 84827 5423.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF CARS 444.69 GAS 92822 84826 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 186.45 GOLF CAR FUEL 92823 82367 5423.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF CARS 369.60 GAS 92824 82366 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,232.04 262017 712912004 105944 EMANUEL, LOU 311.50 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 92912 072304 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 311.50 262018 712912004 102379 EPA AUDIO VISUAL INC. 87.04 BATTERY PACK 93041 154277 5125.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MEDIA STUDIO 87.04 262019. 712912004 112704 FESLER, EDDI 68.50 GALLERY OPENING ITEMS 93087 071904 5120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 68.50 262020 712912004 105420 FIXES SERVICES 34.08 AIR DEODORIZERS 92774 46719 5841.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS YORK OCCUPANCY. 34.08 262021 7/29/2004 108501 FIRE -END & CROKER CORP. 670.34 ADAPTERS 92825 105517 '470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CITY OF EDINA 7/28/2..- . 9:27:44 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 9 . 7/29/2004 —7/29/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 670.34 262022 712912004 101476 FOOTJOY 129.71 MERCHANDISE 93042 5947664 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 54.85 SHOES 93043 5947199 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 184.56 262023 7129/2004 105699 FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE CO. 7,602.24 DENTAL PREMIUMS 93119 072604 1550.6040 HOSPITALIZATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 7,602.24 262024 712912004 101022 FRAME, SUSAN 1,850.00 INSTRUCTOR AC. 93088 071904. 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,850.00 262026 7/2912004. 103039 FREY, MICHAEL 1,620.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 93089 071904 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,620.00 262026 7129/2004 100767 GARDNER HARDWARE COMPANY 158.69 DOOR CLOSURE 92826 0341997 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 158.69 262027 712912004 100773 GENERAL PARTS INC. 42.40 SWITCH 92913 615751 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES - POOL OPERATION 42.40 262028 7/29/2004 104119 GILBERTSON, BRIAN 150.00 PERFORMANCE 8/3/04 92914 072304 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 150.00 262029 7/29/2004 101146 GLOBAL CROSSING TELECOMMUNICAT 218,39 92737 071404 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 218.39 262030 712912004 101679 GOLFCRAFT 245.00 GOLF CLUBS 93044 17909 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 245.00 262031 712912004 100780 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL INC. 1,201.75 JUNE SERVICE 93045 4060304 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 1,201.75 R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount 262032 712912004 233.03 46.54 166.30 115.50 561.37 262033 7129/2004 Vendor / Explanation 101103 GRAINGER LIGHTS CORKBOARD PAINT, BRUSHES DOOR CLOSER 102670 GRAND PERE WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE TELEPHONE GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PROFESSIONAL SVCS - GOLF COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 7/28/2004 9:27:44 Page - 10 Business Unit POOL OPERATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GOLF ADMINISTRATION YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK OCCUPANCY BUILDING MAINTENANCE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL TRAFFIC SIGNALS PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES GOLF ADMINISTRATION YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING CITY OF EDINA 990.20 Council Check Register 14132 5842.5513 7/29/2004 - 7/29/2004 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 92738 498- 723752 -8 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 92827 495- 340020 -9 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 92828 495 - 506071 -2 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 93046 495 - 645917 -8 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE TELEPHONE GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PROFESSIONAL SVCS - GOLF COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 7/28/2004 9:27:44 Page - 10 Business Unit POOL OPERATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GOLF ADMINISTRATION YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK OCCUPANCY BUILDING MAINTENANCE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL TRAFFIC SIGNALS PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES GOLF ADMINISTRATION YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 990.20 93137 14132 5842.5513 990.20 262034 7/2912004 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 1,018.00 92972 65651 5822.5513 388.00 92973 65652 5862.5513 257.00 93138 65699 5842.5513 1,663.00 262036 7/29/2004 101618 GRAUSAM, STEVE 67.45 CELL PHONE CHARGES 92739 072004 5841.6188 67.45 262036 7/29/2004 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 14.17 SCOTCHKOTE, NAIL STRAP 92829 902598907 1646.6406 31.06 SCOTCHKOTE, NAIL STRAP 92829 902598907 1322.6406 26.11 WIRE, SPLICING TAPE 92830 902598898 1322.6530 377.90 WIRE, SPLICING TAPE 92830 902598898 .1330.6530 449.24 262037 7/29/2004 102125 GREG LESSMAN SALES 411.65 GOLF BALLS 92775 28550 5440.5511 411.65 262038 7/29/2004 100786 GREUPNER, JOE 5,003.64 GROUP LESSONS 92831 071904 5410.6132 5,003.64 262040 7/2912004 100782 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. 7,862.70 92673 911248 5842.5512 6,129.75 92674 911808 5842.5512 6,176.50- 92675 643584 5842.5512 66.80- 92676 643719 '942.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE TELEPHONE GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PROFESSIONAL SVCS - GOLF COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 7/28/2004 9:27:44 Page - 10 Business Unit POOL OPERATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GOLF ADMINISTRATION YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK OCCUPANCY BUILDING MAINTENANCE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL TRAFFIC SIGNALS PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES GOLF ADMINISTRATION YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING CITY OF EDINA 7/281. 9:27:44 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 11 7/29/2004 - 7/29/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 21.25- 92677 643536 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 85.44- 92678 643535 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE. 50TH ST SELLING 20.60- 92679 643537 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 8.58- 92680 643531 5862.5512 COST OF-GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 173.60- 92681 643699 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 170.54- 92682 643532 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 4,857.27 92974 921310 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 33.85 92975 921307 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 74.14 92976 921309 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING . 309.09 92977 921311 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1.70 92978 921218 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,628.60 92979 921202 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,281.38 92980 921300 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 932.25 92981 921201 .5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,808.91 92982 921303 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 34.10 92983 921304 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 75.31- 92984 644144 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 50.40- 92985 643557 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 26.53- 92986 643558 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 216.70- 92987 643700 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 148.80- 93139 644105 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 25.00- 93140 644469 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 92.40- 93141 643958 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 20,595.29 262041 7/29/2004 104858 HALPERIN- EATON, TERRI 420.00 REIMBURSE AIRFARE 93090 071904 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 540.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 93090 071904 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 960.00 262042 7/29/2004 101576 HEGGIES PIZZA 144.70 PIZZA 93047 114230 5421.5510. COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 144.70 262043 , 712912004 101209 HEIMARK FOODS 334.40 MEAT PATTIES 93048 017715 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 334.40 262044 7/29/2004 106436 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATION . 385.20 RADIO LEASE 92832 24068009 1470.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 385.20 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7/29/2004 - 7/29/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 262046 7/29/2004 104332 HILL, PRISCILLA 940.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 93091 071904 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 940.00 262046 712912004 104376 HOHENSTEINS INC. 7/28/2004 9:27:44 Page - 12 Business Unit ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 472.50 92683 . 335608 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 635.45 92684 336168 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,107.95 262047 7/29/2004 106461 ROLL, SHELLEY SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 92915 072304 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 65.89 REIMBURSEMENT 93092 071904 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 285.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTOR 93092 071904 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS TREES 8 MAINTENANCE POOL CONCESSIONS POOL CONCESSIONS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 4,704.28 92685 350.89 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 83.90 92686 262048 712912004 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 116443 HOLMES, CARTER 133.50 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 92915 072304 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 133.50 262049 7/29/2004 101774 HONEYWELL INC. 1,119.11 REPAIR MICROCEL 92916 785112 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1,119.11 262050 712912004 100808 HORWATH, THOMAS 354.75 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 92776 071904 1644.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 354.75 262061 7129/2004 112628 ICEE COMPANY, THE 32.00 CONCESSION PRODUCT 92740 032546 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 2,552.00 CONCESSION PRODUCT 93050 063091 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 2,584.00 262062 7/2912004 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. 49.84 PLASTIC SHEET 92741 353556 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 49.84 262063 712912004 100818 INTERSTATE COMPANIES INC. 166.65 OIL FILTERS 92833 00138903 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 166.65 262056 7/29/2004 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS TREES 8 MAINTENANCE POOL CONCESSIONS POOL CONCESSIONS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 4,704.28 92685 1752163 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 83.90 92686 1752160 "862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING CITY OF EDINA 7/28/2004" 9:27:44 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 13 7/29/2004 -7/29/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 351.65 92687 1752162 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 862.06 92688 1752161 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2.03- 92689 254400 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 11.64- 92690 .254401 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 14.55- 92691 255295 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 226.30- 92692 254657 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,121.86 92988 1755226 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 100.90 92989 1755222 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2.42- 92990 255554 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 8.08- 92991 255555 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 112.15- 92992 255847 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 166.40- 92993 255625 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,782.15 93142 1755217 .5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 642.07 93143 1755210 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,344.62 93144 1755219 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,838.41 93145 1755218 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 181.80 93146 1755216 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 35.15 93147 1755221 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 4,371.12 93148 1755220 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 25.70- 93149 255624 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,345.30 93150 1752165 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 201.07 93151 1755213 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 471,77 93152 1755212 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,069.37 93153 1755214 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 275.70 93154 1755208 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,050.56 93155 1755209 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 70.30 93156 1755215 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 23.90- 93157 255553 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING . 57.70- 93158 255552 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 31.20- 93159 255551 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 22,221.97 262056 7129/2004 103664 JOHNSON, DENISE 90.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 93093 071904 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 90.00 262067 7/29/2004 100919 JOHNSON, NAOMI 12.40 PETTY CASH 92777 072104 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 18.53 PETTY CASH 92777 072104 5125.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MEDIA STUDIO 22.75 PETTY CASH 92777 072104 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 30.97 PETTY CASH 92777 072104 5110.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 42.61 PETTY CASH 92777 072104 5111.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/28/2004 9:27:44 Council Check Register Page - 14 7/29/2004 - 7/29/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 49.62 PETTY CASH 92777 072104 5125.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD MEDIA STUDIO 52.19 PETTY CASH 92777 072104 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 71.06 PETTY CASH 92777 072104 5120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 86.28 PETTY CASH 92777 072104 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 386.41 262068 7129/2004 102603 JONAS, LENORE 280.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 93094 071904 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 280.00 262069 7/29/2004 103449 KAMPA, TINA 32.73 PLAYGROUND SUPPLIES 92742 072004 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 200.25 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 92917 072204 1624.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PLAYGROUND & THEATER. 232.98 262060 7129/2004 104369 KARKHOFF, NANCY 55.94 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 92918 072204 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 55.94 262061 712912004 111018 KEEPRS INC. / CY S UNIFORMS 95.95 SHOES 92834 25947 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 95.95 262062 712912004 114276 KELLEHER, KEVIN 8.39 DISPOSABLE CUPS 93049 072204 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 426.00 LENS COVERS 93049 072204 7411.6530 REPAIR PARTS PSTF OCCUPANCY 434.39 262063 7/29/2004 106171 KEYS WELL DRILLING CO. 6,910.00 NEW WELL MOTOR 92778 2004095 05423.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WELL #14 REHAB 6367 DEWEY HILL 6,910.00 262064 7/29/2004 102101 KINKO'S 39.41 NEWSLETTER 92779 062200049672. 5410.6575 PRINTING GOLF ADMINISTRATION 39.41 262066 7129/2004 101340 KOCHENASH, RICK 675.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 93096 071904 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 675.00 262066 712912004 112618 KOLLMER CONSULTANTS INC. 1,496.00 REPAIRS, INSPECTION 92835 1135 '914.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TANKS TOWERS.& RE`' "'` /OIR CITY OF EDINA 7/28/k,-, 9:27:44 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 15 7/29/2004 - 7/29/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,496.00 262067 7/2912004 100846 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO 14.00 92693 406617 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,142.45 92694 406616 5822.5514. COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2,284.25 92695 406775 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 242.00 93160 407438 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 70.00 93161 407437 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 3,757.70 262068 7/29/2004 116776 KUSTOM KARRIERS 249.30 TOW BILL 93116 072604 4601.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE FORFEITURE 249.30 262069 7129/2004 116772 LAUDER, MICHAEL 106.00 MODEL 93097 071904 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 108.00 262070 712912004 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 52.71 GRINDING WHEEL 92743 2206345 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS 148.49 SCREWS, WASHERS, NUTS 92744 2211062 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 295.27 CABLE TIES, PLUGS, GASKETS 92836 2192971 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 496.47 262071 7/2912004 100863 LEEF SERVICES 29.56 SHOP TOWELS 92837 214783 5422.6201 LAUNDRY MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 29.56 262072 7/2912004 100855 LESCO INC. 281.48 TURF PAINT 92838 9RFYW1 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 281.48 262073 712912004 116760 LITTLE LEAGUE BASEBALL ALL -STA 95.00 PROGRAM BOOK AD 92839 061004 5210.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 95.00 262074 7/2912004 106235. LITTLE, LAURA 26.43 PLAYGROUND SUPPLIES 92745 072004 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 26.43 262075 712912004 106449 LONG, DIANE 320.00 PT MAINTENANCE 93098 071904 5111.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/28/2004 9:27:44 Council Check Register Page - 16 .7/29/2004 - 7/29/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 320.00 262076 7/29/2004 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 350.54 CANDY 92746 163269 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 350.54 262077 7/29/2004 103286 M.T.O.A. 2,110.00 REGISTRATION FEE 92932 072304 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2,110.00 262078 712912004 105680 MAAS, STACY 38.72 PETTY CASH 92919 072104 5610.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ED ADMINISTRATION 53.80 PETTY CASH 92919 072104 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 92.52 262079 7/29/2004 100864 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. 56.52 CLOSURE SEALS 92840 2044764 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 31.69 CLOSURE SEAL 92841 2044976 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 363.17 COUNTER, HORN, PLUG 92842 2044668 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 451.38 262080 712912004 100868 MARK VII SALES 37.30 92696 691419 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,938.15 92697 691418 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,973.00 92698 688966 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SO&BEER VERNON SELLING 209.25 92699 689222 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,465.40 92700 691615 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 622.35 92701 689221 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,350.30 92702 691869 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING .03 92703 688965 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 91.90 92704 688967 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 107.50 92705 691630 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 45.95 92706 691616 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 4,062.45 92794 691895 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 59.25 92795 691896 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,494.90 93162 694027 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 37.30 93163 694028 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 15,495.03 262081 7/29/2004 116756 MARKETING BY VIDEO 600.00 ADVERTISING 92780 10902 5410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 600.00 7/28/k, 9:27:44 Page - 17 Business Unit LIQUOR INSPECTION ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GENERAL MAINTENANCE GOLF ADMINISTRATION . CENTENNIAL LAKES CENTENNIAL LAKES CENTENNIAL LAKES CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 7/29/2004 -7/29/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doe No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 262082 712912004 116766 MARSTON, ELIZABETH 63.75 ALCOHOL DECOY 92920 072004 1424.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 63.75 262083 712912004 101030 MATHISON CO. 31.85 CHARCOAL PAPER 93051 571983 -0 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 31.85 262084 7129/2004 104268 MCGARRY, JOANNE 2.44 REFUND 92747 072304 5300.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE 37.56 REFUND 92747 072304 5301.4532 SEASON TICKETS 40.00 262086 7/29/2004 103189 MEDICA 83,959.79 HIGH OPTION 92724 104214102386 1550.6040 HOSPITALIZATION 83,959.79 262086 7129/2004 103189 MEDICA 56,049.41 ELECT OPTION 92725 104214125472 1550.6040 HOSPITALIZATION 56,049.41 262087 7129/2004 103189 MEDICA 4,166.41 SELECT OPTION 92726 104214134271 1550.6040 HOSPITALIZATION 4,166.41 262088 7/2912004 103189 MEDICA 1,001.61 LOW OPTION 92727 104214122552 1550.6040 HOSPITALIZATION 1,001.61 262089 712912004 101483 MENARDS 153.34 WINDOWS 92843 42075 5422.6577 LUMBER .475.78 PUSH LAWNMOWERS 92844 43672 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 60.73 TIMBER WALL 92845 44341 5422.6577 LUMBER 73.05 LUMBER, CHAINLINK 92846 41608 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 89.08 FLAGS 93052 44639 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 851.98 262090 712912004 101987 MENARDS 264.12 SUMP PUMPS 92921 3789 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS 135.51 BRUSHES, PAINT, SUPPLIES 92922 3404 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 80.88 ROUND -UP 92923 5641 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 7/28/k, 9:27:44 Page - 17 Business Unit LIQUOR INSPECTION ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GENERAL MAINTENANCE GOLF ADMINISTRATION . CENTENNIAL LAKES CENTENNIAL LAKES CENTENNIAL LAKES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/28/2004 9:27:44 Council Check Register Page - 18 7/2912004 .-7129/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No - Subledger Account Description Business Unit 101.80 SCOTCHGUARD 92924 1578 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 582.31 262091 7129/2004 100882 MERIT SUPPLY 400.33 CLEANING SUPPLIES 92847 64839 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 93.72 GLASS CLEANER 92848 64863 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1,096.63 LINERS, CLEANERS 92925 64924 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 222.48 CLEANERS 92926 64869 5620.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 1,813.16 262092 7129/2004 100410 METROCALL 322.17 PAGERS 92927 01662548 -1 1400.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 322.17 262093 7129/2004 100892 MIDWEST BADGE 8 NOVELTY CO. IN 33.45 ROSETTES, RIBBONS 93053 108538 5120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 33.45 262094 712912004 100692 MIDWEST COCA -COLA EAGAN 79.80 92707 82513091 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 79.80 262096 7/2912004 103186 MIDWEST FUELS 270.12 FUEL 92849 22050 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF.000RSE 8 GROUNDS 279.71 FUEL 92850 10195 5422.6581 GASOLINE - MAINT OF COURSE 8 GROUNDS 549.83 262096 712912004 101260 MIDWEST LIGHTING PRODUCTS 1,348.56 LIGHT POLE 92748 00038815 1322.6530 REPAIR PARTS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 1,348.56 LIGHT POLE 92851 00038814 1322.6530 REPAIR PARTS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 2,697.12 262097 712912004 101890 MIDWEST VENDING INC 283.24 CANDY 93054 3133 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 283.24 262098 712912004 116770 MINNEAPOLIS.FIRE DEPARTMENT 300.00 METHANE USE 93055 072204 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 300.00 262099 7129/2004 102386 MINNEAPOLIS POLICE CONCERT BAN 100.00 PERFORMANCE 8/1/04 92928 072304 - 610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION CITY OF EDINA 7/28/20u4 9:27:44 RSSCKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page- - 19 7/29/2004 - 7/2912004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 100.00 262100 712912004 116758 MINNEAPOLIS RETAIL MEAT CUTTER 239.20 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT - 92781 072104 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 239.20 262101 7/29/2004 102014 MINNESOTA CLAY USA 72.67 UNDERGLAZE 93056 32226 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION - 72.67 262102 7/29/2004 104856 MINNESOTA PGA 20.00 SCORESHEETS 92782 071504 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 20.00 262103 7129/2004 103404 MINNESOTA PREVENTION RESOURCE 100.00 MPRC CONFERENCE 92929 C009858 1490.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PUBLIC HEALTH 100.00 262104 7/29/2004 101779 MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATIO 240.00 CRIMINAL JUSTICE VIDEO 92930 INV146416 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 240.00 262106 712912004 115082 MOLDOW, GAY 142.60 GALLERY OPENING FOOD 93099 071904 5120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 142.60 262106 7/29/2004 116757 MONGA, TRILOK 490.70 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 92783 072104 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 490.70 262107 7/29/2004 100159 MOOERS PRINTING INC. 255.60 ENVELOPES 92852 3633 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 255.60 262108 7/2912004 102395 MOSE, WILLIAM 534.00 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 92931 072304 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 534.00 262109 7/29/2004 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 170.44 CLOCK MOTOR 92853 421912 -00 5422.6611 IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 436.65 ROLLER 92854 416859 -04 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 162.95 OSMAC TRIAC BOARD 92855 421911 -00 5422.6611. IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/28/2004 9:27:44 Council Check Register Page - 20 7129/2004 - 7/29/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 58.98 SEAL KITS 92856 418998 -00 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 66.81 HUB, PLATE, BEARINGS 92857 419042 -00 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 564.44- CREDIT 92858 419257 -00 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 331.39 262110 7129/2004 114343 MULLEN, JANET 554.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 93100 071904 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 554.00 262111 7/2912004 101727 NELSON, BARBARA 396.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTOR 93101 071904 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 396.00 262112 7/29/2004 100922 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS 1,022.41 SIGN BLANKS, SIGNS 92859 TI- 0125746 1325.6531 SIGNS 8 POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS 1,022.41 262113 7/29/2004 104672 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 30.57 92749 873184124019 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS 36.29 92749 873184124019 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 54.75 92749 873184124019 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET REVOLVING 121.73 92749 873184124019 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 125.16 92749 873184124019 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 180.95 92749 873184124019 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 193.88 92749 873184124019 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 220.76 92749 873184124019 1260.6188 TELEPHONE ENGINEERING GENERAL 668.71 92749 873184124019 5911.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER 263.75 92933 425483229-014 5620.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK 1,896.55 262114 7/29/2004 116480 NSITE MYSTERY SHOPPING 90.00 SHOPPING SERVICE 92934 1011 5822.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 90.00 SHOPPING SERVICE 92934 1011 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 90.00 SHOPPING SERVICE 92934 1611 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 270.00 262116 7/29/2004 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 30.80 TIE DOWNS 92860 289803 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 30.80 262116 7/29/2004 102620 ORIENTAL TRADING COMPANY INC. 46.80 CANVAS TOTE BAGS 93057 592516728-01 '10.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINI`' -SON CITY OF EDINA 7/28/21,. J27:44 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 21 7/29/2004 - 7/29/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 46.80 262117 7129/2004 116754 ORPHEUM THEATRE 699.60 APR 30 LION KING 92784 DEPOSIT 1628.6103.07 TRIPS PROF SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 699.60 262118 712912004 100939 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC. 94.64 COOKIES 93058 70552243 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 194.48 COOKIES 93059 68489243 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 289.12 262119 712912004 102440 PASS, GRACE 620.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 93102 071904 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 620.00 262120 7/29/2004 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 119.70 92708 8041417 -IN 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 192.00 92709 8041416 -IN 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 942.40 92994 8042037 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 199.50 92995 8042039 -IN 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,163.76 92996 8042038 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 855.80 92997 8042035 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 79.80 93164 8041893 -IN 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS. SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,552.96 262121 712912004 101565 PENN CYCLE 23.42 POLICE DEPT 92935 072204 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 289.51 POLICE DEPT 92935 072204 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 336.59 POLICE DEPT 92935. 072204 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL - 649.52 262122 7/29/2004 100946 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 528.10 92750 .65269506 5630.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES 153.50 92785 66384694 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 1,174.65 92786 64058203 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 365.90 92787 63806889 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 339.60 92936 65269620 5630.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES 138,80 92998 63814118 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 191,10 93060 65269616 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 2,891.65 262123 7/29/2004 100948 PERKINS LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7/29/2004 -7/29/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 2,465.00 LANDSCAPE WATERTOWER SITE 93061 072004 05413.1705.30 1,275.00 LANDSCAPE NORMANDALE RD SITE 93062 7/20/04 5913.6180 3,740.00 Subledger Account Description CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTED REPAIRS 7/28/2004 _9:27:44 Page- 22 . Business Unit WATER TREATMENT PLANT #2 DISTRIBUTION 262124 7129/2004 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 841.55 92710 2092243 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 408.50 92711 2092826 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 310.57 92712 2092245 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 12.51- 92713 3301588 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 161.45 92999 2094553 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 125.10 93000 2094547 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5.25- 93001 3301587 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 804.30 93165 2094546 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 847.00 93166 2094548 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 80.90 93167 2094549 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 5,058.75 93168 2094551 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,123.00 93169 2094552 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,031.40 93170 2094550 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 65.60- 93171 3301807 - 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 10,709.16 262126 7/2912004 102166 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING 272.41 92714 44231 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 727.23 92715 43882 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 637.57 92716 44246 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 758.03 92717 44287 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX . VERNON SELLING 8.08 CANDY 92751 44247 5841.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK OCCUPANCY 8.08 CANDY 92752 43819 5841.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK OCCUPANCY 239.80 93172 44618 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 230.15 93173 44615 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 333.30 93174 44617 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 609.13 93175 44587 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,823.78 262126 7129/2004 100961 POSTMASTER 1,300.00 POSTAGE 93103 071904 5110.6235 POSTAGE ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,300.00 262127 712912004 105055 POWDERHORN NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOC. 90.00 PROGRAM AD 93063 PRG008 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 90.00 CITY OF EDINA 7/28/2004 9:27:44 RSSCKREG . LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - '23 7/29/2004 - 7/29/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 262128 7/2912004 106072 PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC. 660.94 SPECIAL FLOWER MIX 92861 92273 5422.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 660.94 262129 7/2912004 100964 PRECISION TURF & CHEMICAL 155.76 ANT CONTROL 92862 23314 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 155.76 262130 7/2912004 114516 PRESS PUBLICATIONS 350.00 ADVERTISING 93064 298870 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 350.00 262131 7129/2004 104424 PRIEDE, SOREN 288.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 93104 071904 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 288.00 262132 712912004 100966 PRINTERS SERVICE INC 102.00 BLADE SHARPENING 92937 204356 5521.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ARENA ICE MAINT 102.00 262133 712912004 100968 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 542.33 93002 921302 5822.5513 COST OF. GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 909,21 93003 921308 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 15.31- 93004 644021 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,003.82 93176 921299 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,440.05 262134 7/2912004 106690 PRO -TEC DESIGN INC. 131.00 OPEN HOUSE PROGRAMMING 92938 45269 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL 294.75 REMOVE & REINSTALL CAMERA 92939 45266 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL 425.75 262135 712912004 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 311.33 SOAP, LINERS, ROLL TOWEL 92940 3340 5620.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 311.33 262136 7129/2004 104669 PURE BLUE 198.00 HYDROSPEX, FLEXFRAMES 92941 17840 5310.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL ADMINISTRATION 198.00 262139 7/2912004 100971 QUALITY WINE 32.36 - 93005 430325 -00 5840.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation 1,632.93 15.27- 1,542.26 12.70- 1,282.73 19.61- 1,989.38 24.73- 1,249.57 11.26- 570.35 1.68- 170.76 23.77- 1,201.27 6.08- 616.25 96.95 7.99 - 9.85- 996.09 11,183.24 262140 712912004 101966 OWEST 107.16 952 451 -6058 92863 071004 1400.6188 107.16 262141 7/2912004 100287 RAMSEY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPART 200.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 93118 072604 1000.2055 200.00 262142 712912004 CITY OF EDINA 4077.6103 63.75 Council Check Register 92942 072004 7/29/2004 - 7/2912004 GENERAL SUPPLIES PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 93005 430325 -00 5842.5512 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 93006 429447 -00 5860.5518 93006 429447 -00 5862.5513 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 93007 430532 -00 5860.5518 SOFTENER SALT 93007 430532 -00 5862.5513 SOFTENER SALT 93008 430555 -00 5840.5518 93008 430555 -00 5842.5513 93009 427840 -00 5860.5518 93009 427840 -00 5862.5512 93010 430326 -00 5860.5518 93010 430326 -00 5862.5512 93011 430295 -00 5860.5518 93011 430295-00 5862.5513 93012 430329 -00 5820.5518 93012 430329 -00 5822.5512 93013 430533 -00 5820.5518 93013 430533 -00 5822.5513 93014 430489-00 5842.5514 93015 428964 -00 5862.5513 93177 430488 -00 5840.5518 93177 430488 -00 5842.5513 262140 712912004 101966 OWEST 107.16 952 451 -6058 92863 071004 1400.6188 107.16 262141 7/2912004 100287 RAMSEY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPART 200.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 93118 072604 1000.2055 200.00 262142 712912004 116764 RASSCHAERT, CARLI LIQUOR INSPECTION 4077.6103 63.75 ALCOHOL DECOY 92942 072004 63.75 470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERA' 262143 7/2912004 102631. REAMER, MARK 890.00 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 92943 072204 890.00 262144 7/2912004 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 52.72 SOFTENER SALT 92864 00151388 17.57. SOFTENER SALT 92865 00151357 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VENDOR DISCOUNTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VENDOR DISCOUNTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VENDOR DISCOUNTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VENDOR DISCOUNTS COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VENDOR DISCOUNTS COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VENDOR DISCOUNTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VENDOR DISCOUNTS COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VENDOR DISCOUNTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VENDOR DISCOUNTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 7/28/2004 9:27:44 Page- 24 Business Unit YORK SELLING VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL VERNON SELLING VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL VERNON SELLING LIQUOR YORK GENERAL YORK SELLING VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL VERNON SELLING VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL VERNON SELLING VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL VERNON SELLING 50TH STREET GENERAL 50TH ST SELLING 50TH STREET GENERAL 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING LIQUOR YORK GENERAL YORK SELLING TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 1424.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIQUOR INSPECTION 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERA' R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Vendor! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description i3usmess unit 70.29 262145 7/29/2004 100982 ROTO - ROOTER 125.00 DRAIN CLEANING 92944 04810411825 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 125.00 262146 7/29/2004 100985 RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON EQ CO INC 45.08 HINGE 92866 C35332 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN - 45.08 262147 712912004 101232 SALUD AMERICA 838.00 92721 610A 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 838.00 262146 7/29/2004 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 26.64 101- 26373069350 92945 072204 1623.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TENNIS INSTRUCTION 51.19 101- 26373069350 92945 072204 4075.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANVALKENBURG 77.83 262149 712912004 103859 SANDBERG, MARY 54.00 MODEL 93105 071904 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES . ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 54.00 262150 7/29/2004 100896 SBC PAGING 151.56 PAGERS 92946 30343007040 5620.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK 151.56 262151 712912004 100990 SCHARBER & SONS 22.84 RELAY, SWITCH, DIODE 92867 319051 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 22.84 262162 7/29/2004 116773 SCHMITT, BOB 450.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 93106 071904 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 450.00 262153 712912004 116761 SCHOENBAUER, TROY - 630.00 REMOVAL OF BOULDERS 92868 070304 5431.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 630.00 262164 7/2912004 116762 SCHOENFELDER PAINTING INC. 2,450.00 EXTERIOR PAINTING 92869 B161 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP 2,450.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 FERTILIZER 92753 401252SI CITY OF EDINA FERTILIZER FIELD MAINTENANCE 386.06 Council Check Register 262162 7/2912004 106403 SOUND CLIPS INC. 7/29/2004 - 7/29/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 262165 7/29/2004 101970 SCOTT COUNTY_ NURSERY INC 262163 712912004 101002 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS INC 692.25 MULCH 92870 43891 5422.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK 152551 5842.5515 692.25 YORK SELLING.:: 6,270.10 92797 152550 262156 7/2912004 YORK SELLING 116769 SCOTT SPECIALTY GASES 92798 152545 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING ". 275.59 CALIBRATION METHANE 93065 1 -0664 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 84.40 275.59 93066 346755 5430.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER RICHARDS GOLF-COURSE 262157 712912004 105650 SCRAP METAL PROCESSORS INC. 262164 7/291200/ 110977 SOW, ADAMA 150.00 CONTAINER RENTAL 92871 D- COE4 -7 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 150.00 262158 7/2912004 104251 SHANNON, IDELLE 30.00 SOUND SYSTEM COVER 92947 099991 5620.6406 GENERAL S_ UPPLIES 30.00 262159 7/29/2004 106002 SHOEMAKER, JAMI 54.00 MODEL 93107 071904 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 54.00 262160 712912004 116775 SIMONSON, MITCHELL 24.36 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 93115 072604 1190.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE. 24.36 262161 7/2912004 100301 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 7/28/2004 9:27:44 Page - 26 Business Unit MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS PSTF OCCUPANCY CENT SVC PW BUILDING EDINBOROUGH PARK ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ASSESSING 386.06 FERTILIZER 92753 401252SI 1642.6540 FERTILIZER FIELD MAINTENANCE 386.06 262162 7/2912004 106403 SOUND CLIPS INC. 31.95 BREATHALYZER VIDEO 92948 26690 1400.6405 BOOKS & PAMPHLETS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 31.95 262163 712912004 101002 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS INC 27.10 92796 152551 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD'MIX YORK SELLING.:: 6,270.10 92797 152550 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER ." :- YORK SELLING 909.95 92798 152545 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING ". 27.10 92799 152546 5622.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 84.40 93066 346755 5430.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER RICHARDS GOLF-COURSE 7,318.65 262164 7/291200/ 110977 SOW, ADAMA R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7/29/2004 —7/29/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1,638.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 93108 071904 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 7/28/2004 9:27:44 Page- 27 Business Unit ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE CONTRACTED REPAIRS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS AUTOMOBILES & TRUCKS UTILITY BALANCE SHEET PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ED ADMINISTRATION REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION.GEN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,638.00 262166 712912004 106193 SPAIN, MARK 96.96 UNIFORM PURCHASE 92754 071904 1646.6201 1,375.00 TREE & STUMP REMOVAL 92872 072204 5422.6180 1,471.96 262166 712912004 106187 SPECTRUM SCREENPRINTING INC. 102.00 PARADE SHIRTS 93067 21563 1627.6103 195.00 PARADE SHIRTS 93068 21392 1627.6103 297.00 262167 712912004 101462 SPORT HALEY INC. 1,095.13 MERCHANDISE 92788 PSI- 018927 5440.5511 1,095.13 262168 712912004 101004 SIPS COMPANIES. 13.12 COUPLINGS 92755 S1047315.001 5913.6406 13.12 262169 7/2912004 103277 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO INC 102.07 OIL FILTERS 92873 S130161 5422.6530 95,086.40 BACKHOE. HAMMER & COMPACTOR 93019 SM08433 5900.1735 95,188.47 262170 712912004 102193 STAN BANN BIG BAND 100.00 PERFORMANCE 8/4/04 92900 072304 5610.6136 100.00 262171 7/2912004 101007 STAR TRIBUNE 210.60 ACCT 1808753 92949 070204 5610.6105 210.60 262172 7/2912004 102069 STEPP MANUFACTURING CO. INC. 69.23 HOSE 92874 28141 1553.6530 69.23 262173 7/29/2004 106452 STONE, HOLLY 320.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 93109 071904 5110.6103 320.00 7/28/2004 9:27:44 Page- 27 Business Unit ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE CONTRACTED REPAIRS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS AUTOMOBILES & TRUCKS UTILITY BALANCE SHEET PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ED ADMINISTRATION REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION.GEN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/28/2004 9:27:44 Council Check Register Page - 28 7/29/2004 - 7/29/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 262174 712912004 102639 STROHMYER, TOM 150.00 PERFORMANCE 8/5/04 92950 072304 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 150.00 262175 712912004 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 199.44 BUMPER PACK, LATCHES 92875 345740CVW 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 70.98- CREDIT 92676 CM345740CVW 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 268.42 DEFLECTOR, BAR, CAP 92877 345526CVW 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN - 10.89- CREDIT 92878 CM258787CVW 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,936.02 REPAIRS 92879 CVCB464139 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 331.68 BUMPER PACK 92880 345152CVW 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,653.69 262176 712912004 101336_ SULLIVAN, MONICA 585.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 93110 071904 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 585.00 262177 7/29/2004 112663 SUMMIT CUSTOM LANDSCAPE 490.00 RE- GRADE, DIRT AND SEED 92951 12291 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 490.00 262178 7/29/2004 102140 SUN MOUNTAIN SPORTS INC. 21.85 MERCHANDISE 93069 491828 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 21.85 262179 7129/2004 100926 SUN TURF INC. 1,138.55 FUNGICIDE 92952 540316 5630.6540 FERTILIZER CENTENNIAL LAKES 1,138.55 262180 7/2912004 116759 SUNDBERG COMPANY 39.80 REFRIGERATOR HANDLE 92881 8162255 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 39.80 262181 7/29/2004 110674 SUPERIOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIO 35.34 CLIP CASES 92882 5736 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 35.34 262182 7/29/2004 111616 T.D. ANDERSON INC. 35.00 BEERLINE CLEANING 93070 574247 5421.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GRILL 35.00 262183 712912004 101326 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO 5630.6540 FERTILIZER 5410.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX R55CKREG LOG20000 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 262186 7/29/2004 5421.5514 101029 TESSMAN SEED 60. Council Check Register COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD. BEER 7129/2004 - 7/29/2004 FERTILIZER Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 43.42 FUSES 92756 60200 -00 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 43.42 7/2912004 116482 THAYER, TIMOTHY R. 262184 712912004 112248 TERMINIX 85.00 PEST CONTROL 92757 110183 5311.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5630.6540 FERTILIZER 5410.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 85.00 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 262186 7/29/2004 5421.5514 101029 TESSMAN SEED 60. 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD. BEER 65.90 FERTILIZER 92953 5053036 -IN 743.43 WEED 65.90 92883 826- 0305 -7/04 1643.6546 262186 7/2912004 116482 THAYER, TIMOTHY R. 211.88 CPR POCKET MASKS 93071 152 211.88 262187 7129/2004 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 2,385.95 92722 340639 95.60 92723 340638 498.05 92789 341068 354.00 93072 13387 741.35 93073 341905 498.75 93074 341319 4,845.10 93178 341427 53.80 93179 341428 9,472.60 262188 712912004 101048 TRI COUNTY BEVERAGE & SUPPLY 72.00 92800 155991 72.00 262189 712912004 113656 TRIMARK SPORTSWEAR GROUP 52.87 PARADE SHIRTS 93075 1- 2003423 52.87 262190 7/2912004 100682 TRUGREEN- CHEMLAWN 5630.6540 FERTILIZER 5410.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD. BEER 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 1627.6103 53.25 WEED CONTROL 92883 826-0305 -7/04 .1552.6103 58.58 WEED CONTROL 92883 826-0305 -7/04 1470.6103 111.83, WEED CONTROL 92883 826-0305 -7/04 1628.6103 743.43 WEED CONTROL 92883 826- 0305 -7/04 1643.6546 967.09 262191 712912004 101046 TURF SUPPLY COMPANY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WEED SPRAY 7/28/20L .9:27:44. Page 29 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN POOL OPERATION CENTENNIAL LAKES GOLF ADMINISTRATION VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING GRILL 'GRILL GRILL GRILL VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING SPECIAL ACTIVITIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL SENIOR CITIZENS GENERAL TURF CARE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/28/2004 9:27:44 Council Check Register Page - 30 7/29/2004 - 7/29/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 99.85 CART INDICATORS 92884 094311 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 99.85 262192 712912004 101047 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO 329.64 PARTS /SERVICE 92885 219270 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 329.64 262193 7/29/2004 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO. 404.70 SEED 92886 10308 5422.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 404.70 262194 7/29/2004 100371 UNITED RENTALS 314.72 LIFT REPAIRS 92954 41521599 -001 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 314.72 262196 7/29/2004 103298 UPS STORE #1716, THE 12.61 MAILINGS 92955 070104 5910.6235 POSTAGE GENERAL (BILLING) 45.25 MAILINGS 92955 070104 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 57.86 262196 7/29/2004 101908 US FOODSERVICE INC 172.53 CLEANING PRODUCTS 92758 33191696 5311.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 469.35 CONCESSION PRODUCT 92758 33191696 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 584.81 CONCESSION PRODUCT 92759 33190738 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 506.50 CONCESSIONS 92887 33193966 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 25.56 CLEANERS 92956 33188206 5311.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 85.10 CLEANERS 92957 33195148 5311.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 369.19 CONCESSION PRODUCT 92957 33195148 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 2,213.04 262197 7/29/2004 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 136.64 ROLL TOWEL, UTENSILS 92760 538242 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW.BUILDING 141.11 BAGS 92761 538491 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 409.60 TISSUE, ROLL TOWEL 92790 538495 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 401.40 PAPER SUPPLIES 92888 538958 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 125.35 ROLL TOWEL, TISSUE, CUPS 93076 538957 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 1,214.10 262198 712912004 101060 VANTAGE ELECTRIC 880.05 DIMMER PACK INSTALLATION 92958 17904 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 880.05 CITY OF EDINA 7/28/2004 9:27:44 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 31 7/29/2004 -7/29/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 262199 712912004 102970 VERIZON WIRELESS 525.37 92959 3549675935 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2.93 93077 3549672408 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 8.49 93077 3549672408 1490.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC HEALTH 9.39 93077 3549672408 1190.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ASSESSING 13.24 93077 3549672408 1140.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLANNING 37.38 93077 3549672408 2210.6188 TELEPHONE COMMUNICATIONS 88.53 93077 3549672408 1600.6188 TELEPHONE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 89.66 93077 3549672408 1640.6188 TELEPHONE PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 93.05 93077 3549672408 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 117.67 93077 3549672408 1120.6188 TELEPHONE ADMINISTRATION 171.89 93077 3549672408 1495.6188 TELEPHONE INSPECTIONS 1,157.60 262200 7/29/2004 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. - 490.00 GOLF CAR RENTAL 93078 15557 5423.6216 LEASE LINES GOLF CARS 490.00, 262201 7/29/2004 102499 VIEWPOINT INTERNATIONAL 168.15 MERCHANDISE 92791 8129806 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 168.15 262202 712912004 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 6.43 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 92762 8297447 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING. MAINTENANCE 174.32 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 92762 8297447 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 289.76 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 92762 8297447 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 470.51 262203 7/29/2004 101069 VOSS LIGHTING 126.84 LIGHTING 92889 2185949 -02 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 511.42 LIGHTING 92890 2185949 -01 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 638.26 262204 7129/2004 102886 WAGNER GREENHOUSES INC. 247.81 PLANTS 92891 110251 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET REVOLVING 247.81 262205 7/29/2004 101223 WALSER FORD 97.92 MIRROR ASSEMBLY 92892 113507WFOW 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 97.92 262206 7/29/2004 102342 WENZEL, KENNETH R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/28/2004 , 9:27:44 Council Check Register Page - 32 7/29/2004 = 7/29/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor ! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit . 720.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 93111 071904 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 720.00 262207 712912004 101077 WEST WELD SUPPLY CO. 1,493.66 HAMMER DRILL, ANGLE GRINDER 92763 63218 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,493.66 262208 7/2912004 116768 WET PAINT INC. 70.00 PAPER 93079 008085 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 70.00 262209 7/29/2004 104334 WHITING, SARAH. 720.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTOR 93112 071904 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 720.00 262210 7/29/2004 103336 WILLIAMS ARCHITECTS 3,722.69 ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES 92764 0010861 5300.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET 3,722.69 262211 7/2912004 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 644.05 93016 32100 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 284.05 93017 32101 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 695.60 93018 32122 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 80.00- 93180 31916 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,543.70 - 262212 712912004 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 475.15 93181 101074 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 675.80 93182 101075 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE . YORK SELLING 275.70- 93183 21375 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 875.25 262213 7/29/2004 112964 WISCONSIN TURF EQUIPMENT CORP. 59.54 BEARING KIT, SPACERS 92893 462430 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 59.54 262214 , 7/29/2004 101082 WITTEK GOLF,SUPPLY 191.48 GOLF BALLS, PENCILS 92960 60910 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 191.48 262216 712912004 100691 WITTSTRUCK, MARTHA 540.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 93113 071904 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register. 7/29/2004 —7/29/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 540.00 262216 7129/2004 116774 WOODLAKE NATURE CENTER 700.00 CONTRACTED STAFF 93114 072604 1624.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 700.00 262217 7/2912004 101726 XCEL ENERGY 31.94 92765 0610586055196, 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER 31.94 536,363.78 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 536,363.78 Total Payments 536,363.78 7/28/2004 9:27:44 Page - 33 Business Unit PLAYGROUND & THEATER TRAFFIC SIGNALS R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7128/2004 9:29:56 Council Cheek Summary Page - 1 7/29/2004 - 7/29/2004 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 193,181.05 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 87.38 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 2,739.05 05100 ART CENTER FUND 24,337.37 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 95.00 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 10,115.23 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 24,181.89 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 2,979.84 05600 EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND 9,363.34 05800 LIQUOR FUND 157,282.96 05900 UTILITY FUND 110,262.82 05930 STORM SEWER.FUND 420.00 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 1,317.85 Report Totals 536,363.78 We confirm to the best of our knowlege and belief, that these chime comply in all materiel respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policies and procedu" .7 w91�1� MINUTES OF THE o e Regular Meeting of the yEdina Transportation Commission v Thursday, June 24, 2004 Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Community Room MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairperson Fred Richards, Marie Thorpe, Jean White, Warren Plante, Joni Bennett, Les Wanninger MEMBERS ABSENT: Dean Dovolis, Bill Skallerud STAFF PRESENT: Wayne Houle, Steve Lillehaug, Sharon Allison I. Approval of Minutes from May 27, 2004 A motion was made by Bennett and seconded by Wanninger to approve the minutes of May 27, 2004 as submitted. II. Presentation and Review of Transportation Commission Policy Appendices Before reviewing the Transportation Commission Policy Appendices, Bennett expressed some concerns regarding the draft policy being developed and the timeframe in which it is being done. Bennett stated that over the last month she researched other cities' transportation plans and found the City of Bloomington's Plan to be very will organized. She stated that Edina's Plan resembles Bloomington's but with fairly significant alterations. Significant differences cited by Bennett are: Bloomington's Plan is well established (20 years old), yet in 1997 they took a full year to review and revise their policy. The planning process included bi- monthly meetings, tours of traffic calming devices in other cities and simulation with a fire truck, a bus and an emergency response vehicle. She stated that Bloomington's Commission members received information from staff in 'bite size chunks' so that they could absorb and assimilate the information. Staff then prepared the draft of a plan that was finally adopted. Bennett feels that a significant amount of information that is new to her, has been presented without a chance to fully digest, understand and give feedback on such information. She believes some of the information is irrelevant and not functional to the Commission, while important information is missing. Bennett stated further, that in an attempt to fully understand what it is the Commission is trying to address, she sent questions to staff two weeks prior to the regular scheduled monthly meeting, but could not get a response until the time of the scheduled monthly meeting. Bennett stated that it is her hope that Edina would do the same as Bloomington and take a full year to develop its plan. In response to Bennett's concerns, Richards stated that generally Edina does not compare itself to other communities. He also reminded Bennett that at the first meeting all Commission members agreed that individual Commission members would not go to staff and request information on their own and if information was requested, it would be decided upon by the Commission itself and then shared with the entire Commission. Richards stated further that they also agreed to adopt a game plan and then move forward. As such, the Commission will continue to review the staff prepared draft Transportation Plan and at the end, Commission members will have the opportunity to accept, modify or change the draft as presented. White stated that she concurs with Bennett regarding the amount of information being presented to them with not much time given to comprehend and respond and asked if they would be given a chance to respond. Richards reiterated that Commission members would have the opportunity to review fully the draft as presented or make changes once staff has had a chance to present the draft in its entirety. a. Appendix A — Definitions Lillehaug said staff compiled a summary of available traffic definitions in response to a request from Bennett. The following are responses to other requests. Historic and forecast population figures were taken from the Met Council's 1998 Regional blueprint accordin�to SRF, the consultant that did the study. Increased traffic around the area of 44 and France Avenue is based on a model that forecasts increases in employment, infill in Edina, Minneapolis and St. Louis Park traffic and redevelopment. In response to the list of definitions, Bennett said Bloomington's list is very short (only 5 definitions), is user friendly and fits with what the Institute of Transportation Engineers describes. Bennett believes Edina's definitions could be more clearly defined if they adopt Bloomington's model. She would like to spend some time discussing some of the definitions that she believes to be in conflict with Bloomington's and materials presented by Edina. Houle stated that Bloomington spent the year developing a "traffic- calming plan ", whereas Edina has adopted a "Transportation Plan" and under this broad plan is a traffic calming policy for neighborhoods. He also stated that the definitions were taken from the Met Council and other cities' materials. One definition that requires more discussion, according to Houle, is 'cut- through traffic.' Wanninger stated that the definitions serve as a source to better understanding of the materials he's reading. b. Appendix B — Traffic Management Devices /Measures Lillehaug stated that Appendix B is a list of all reasonable traffic management devices available. He elaborated on four of the devices, (how they affect emergency response, affects speed of traffic, etc.) to give a better understanding of how they work and the different purposes they serve. The four are: Speed Hump, Speed Table (Raised Crosswalk), Raised Intersection and Radar Speed Display Unit. Wanninger asked about cost under the Evaluation Considerations section. Houle stated that there is a budget for traffic management devices and the high /medium /low cost is in reference to what it will cost the neighborhoods in assessments. Thorpe said the words 'probable' 2 and 'possible,' under Speed Reduction and Traffic Reduction seems non - committal. Lillehaug said they are non - committal because one can never say exactly where the speed /traffic will be reduced. White asked which emergency response team has priority over the policy. Lillehaug said both Police and Fire will look at the policy and all - applications will be submitted for their review and if any pose a hazard it will not be implemented. Houle stated he requested money to replace the current speed trailer and to also purchase stationary ones to be installed at areas where most speeding tickets are issued. Wanninger suggested it might be possible for a community to build up a perception as to what the speed limit ought to be based on the traffic calming devices they have. One consideration is the public's perception of what the community attitude is about speeding. Thorpe said people living near speed humps might not like them because of the noise created when speeding over them. Lillehaug said all the information is being shared so that Commissioners can dialogue and give feedback. White asked if there are any examples around town that they could look at. Houle said yes, and staff could compile a list. Richards said he thought they were going to put together a policy statement that includes all viable options without making any judgments and have them available for use by the Commissioners and neighborhoods. And they would not.look at examples of devices until they begin dealing with substantive issues such as a speed bump request for a particular location. Bennett stated she does not think the Commission should have everything without checking to see what works. Thorpe stated that many cities do have all the traffic calming devices but it would be good to do some research and have a list of where there are some in the city for viewing. Plante asked if neighbors will be bringing the issues forward, who will decide the appropriate action to take — would it be staff or the Commission? Richards said the Commission, staff and neighborhoods are going to make recommendations to the Council, the decision - making body. Thorpe stated that the expertise of staff would be relied on when considering recommendations. Bennett stated that the ordinance does say the Commission is to make recommendations. III. Review of Transportation Commission Policy (continued from previous meeting) a. Option B — Scoring for Ranking Lillehaug said staff is recommending removing Ranking #5 because the Petition -to- study step falls after the Ranking and Scoring step. Lillehaug provided two examples of how the Ranking and Scoring would work using fictitious numbers. The first location, Woodland Rd. between Concord Ave. and Wooddale Ave., is a location where a request was made recently for a stop sign. However, Lillehaug said staff did not recommend installing a stop sign but would be a location where a different traffic - calming device may be appropriate. Some factors that led to Woodland receiving a higher scoring are: its proximity to a school and having no sidewalks. The next location, Edinborough Way, between W. 76th St. and Parklawn Ave., with a higher traffic volume, received a lower scoring. This location is a higher density neighborhood, has sidewalks and is adjacent to a commercial area. Lillehaug stated it would appear that Edinborough Way should have a higher scoring because of higher traffic volume and possibly higher speed, but this is not the case according to the 3 scoring. Woodland, being close to a school and having no sidewalks for pedestrian traffic gives it a higher scoring. Bennett asked staff to explain how multiple streets will be handled. Lillehaug said if five �. petitions are received for a neighborhood they will not be studied individually because the streets traffic volume may be linked together. Bennett believes this would create a conflict and unfairness and suggested a better way would be to study each neighborhood and come up with a plan. Her concern is that Edina's policy calls for a much lower notice area, whereas Bloomington has a much higher notice area. Lillehaug stated that staff is of the opinion that neighborhoods would not receive priority ahead of single streets, especially when there are no sidewalks. To make it fair, Bennett suggested linking the streets being considered and this becomes the notice area and they would be included in the petition along with others who will be impacted. Houle stated that this is the next step in the process. Wanninger stated he did not understand how fairness would have an effect on the Ranking and Scoring system since it is being established to rank different projects and prioritize them based on their score. Bennett said this is in reference to the petition area that the policy shows as being within 100 feet or one block of the proposed device. She said there should be consistency between what's defined as the notice area and the area that qualifies for Ranking and Scoring. Staff could not clearly understand Bennett's objection so Lillehaug suggested they continue the dialogue when they begin discussion on the benefited area. b. Option B — Process and Schedule Lillehaug said the schedule would need to be revised if they are going to include the �. before data collection of step 2; which is part of the Ranking and Scoring. The initial scoring and screening could be done in February, but data collection has to be done when there is no snow on the ground. Also, to get a good range and effect of the device, it should be installed before July /Aug /Sept. Bennett said Bloomington's schedule is not as close as Edina's because their data collection is taking two weeks instead of one month. C Richards suggested that if there were numerous petitions the Commission would have to meet more than once a month. He said the Commission would adapt to the circumstance. Bennett said they do not know what the current volume is because they've never been presented with them. She said a policy is being designed and it's not clear for what purpose. She said Bloomington does not require a petition study (this is done during the application phase), which is a time saver instead of time crunch and they use two weeks for traffic to stabilize and then measure data. Lillehaug said it should take only two weeks to gather data. Houle said they did not use Bloomington's petition process because if a non - traffic person passes around a petition to have something done to a street, this could give a false sense that something is going to happen vs. calling staff and filing an application. Staff can then look to see if it makes sense to begin a petition process. Houle stated that past experience shows that the petitioners may intentionally avoid some neighbors. Lillehaug said this would also give staff some time to determine if the problem is real or perceived. 4 c. Other Policy Discussion, Comments and Recommendations The traffic - calming devices listed on the spreadsheet will be converted to single pages - like the examples presented and distributed prior to the next scheduled meeting. Staff will also prepare thresholds for the effects on other neighborhoods of a petitioned area for the potential diversion of traffic. Richards asked if staff is planning to draft a policy statement defining who will be notified when a petition is initiated? Lillehaug said it is listed under the benefited area. Bennett asked why wasn't a policy drafted for collector streets like Bloomington did. Houle said he is not familiar with Bloomington's streets, but in Edina all collector streets are State Aid streets and the City would lose funding eligibility if we installed traffic - calming devices on them. Bennett asked who sought the collector street classification for Vernon Ave. Houle indicated .he was not sure because it dates back to the 1980's. Typically, if volume changes on a road, the County could chose to take it out (or add) it to their system, which is what they tried to do with Vernon Ave. However, the Council passed a resolution to not take it back. As development takes place roads are generally reclassified to match the higher volume of traffic. Richards asked Commissioners if there is any other information that they would like staff to add before the revised draft policy is distributed in July. Bennett said the majority of the draft policy concerns neighborhood traffic management and traffic calming and the ordinance is much broader. She said it directs the Commission to consider mass transit opportunities and pedestrian activities and there is not much that address these issues. White and Bennett both prepared some changes for the draft policy and copies were given to Commissioners and staff. Richards asked staff to complete the Transportation Plan draft, including all proposed revisions to date by Commissioners and submit the updated draft to the Commission for its review in July. Richards then addressed the residents in attendance, asking them if they would like to address the Commission. Addressing the Commission were: Timothy Rudnick!, 4224 Lynn Ave. Mr. Rudnicki stated that as a citizen of Edina he is concerned with traffic development. He said he had some difficulty finding the meeting dates and time. He is also concerned about the process and asked if more could be done to involve more citizens. Richards said the Commission is working on creating a policy statement to involve citizens. Mr. Rudnicki asked if there was a statutory issue behind the purposes of the Commission. Richards explained that the Council felt there was a broad transportation issue that needed to be addressed based on the findings of the Traffic Task Force and as a result, the Commission was appointed to address those findings, among other things. The Commission felt it was necessary to create its own policy document before addressing substantive issues. Richards said creation of the policy document should then provide for citizen input on substantive transportation issues. Kristy Anderson: Ms. Anderson asked how is the policy being developed. Richards explained that they are creating the policy with staffs assistance and then Commissioners will go through and adopt a final policy. Richards explained that the 5 Commission is advisory in nature and as such will be making recommendations to the Council. Jennifer Janovy: Ms Janovy said the website is not up to date and it does not contain accurate information. She suggested adding Commissioners' contact information because not everyone can attend the meetings. Richards said per state law, the public's business must be conducted in public. He does not believe discussions should be taking place outside of the regularly scheduled meeting time. He said if individuals cannot attend the meetings, they can send correspondences through the regular mail or email to staff and staff has been directed to share everything with the Commission. IV. Other Governmental Activities Houle stated that MnDOT is planning to remove the W. 78th Street westbound access from the TH494/TH169 interchange and Edina, along with the cities of Bloomington and Eden Prairie are working jointly to stop this from happening. If this access is eliminated the next access would be France and after France, it would be approximately 4 -5 miles before another local access is available. Commissioner White said she visited the 494 Corridor's office to gather some information on parking. She said she's been studying parking to see if there's any connection between parking and traffic issues. She suggested possibly looking at how the Transportation Commission could interface with the Planning Commission where parking and traffic issues are concerned if there's a connection. V. Adjournment Meeting adjourned at 7:55 p.m. Next meeting is scheduled for July 22, 2004, 6:00 -8:00 p.m. in the Community Room, City Hall. .:1 Gordon Hughes ­From: Bennerotte Sent:. Wednesday, July 28, 2004 8:33 AM To: Darlene Wallin Cc: Gordon Hughes Subject: FW: Parks & smoking ban - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Mark Sprenkle [mailto:spren005 @umn.edu] Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 8:50 PM „ To: Jennifer Bennerotte Subject: Parks & smoking ban I am writing to strongly urge the Edina City Council to support a ban on tobacco use at all Edina Parks at all times. This issue affects me both personally and professionally. I am an Edina resident who frequently takes my 3 year old daughter to various Edina parks. I feel the parks contribute to the excellent quality of life we enjoy as Edina residents. I do not want my child, and others, to be exposed to tobacco while they play. As a community we should follow the lead of other communities that have already passed a tobacco ban and be an example to communities who have yet to follow that lead. As a pediatrician I am constantly counseling kids /teens to pursue a healthy lifestyle. This obviously includes not using tobacco, in addition to avoiding other risk taking behaviors. Youth can be so easily influenced by the behaviors of those around them. Exposure to tobacco use sends an unspoken message that smoking is OK. If we can limit our children's exposure to something we know is unhealthy for them, shouldn't we take action and do just that? Not only would our community set a good example for our children, but we would additionally reap the benefits of limiting the exposure of children to the dangers of second hand smoke. This is such an important health issue for our children and our community at large. Please support the ban in full, by restricting (and enforcing) tobacco use in our neighborhood parks at all times. Thank you. Trudie Sprenkle, MD 4113 W 42nd Street Edina MN 55416 1 1k Gordon Hughes From: Jennifer Bennerotte Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 8:32 AM To: Darlene Wallin Cc: Gordon Hughes Subject: FW: Tobacco Free athletic fields - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Adler, Stuart [mailto:SAdler @STPHC.COM] Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 9:58 PM To: Jennifer Bennerotte Subject: Tobacco Free athletic fields Mayor Maetzold, Council Members: Kelly,Hovland,Masica, and Housh, I am writing in regard to the proposed smoking ban in Edina Parks. I would strongly suppport such a ban in all places where our youth participate in athletic pursuits. As a Physician taking care of Cardiac patients on a daily basis I see the ravages of tobacco abuse. I would strongly encourage you to enact this smoking ban. Respectfully Stuart Adler MD 1 Page 1 of 1 Gordon Hughes From: Jennifer Bennerotte Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 3:25 PM To: Darlene Wallin Cc: Gordon Hughes Subject: FW: smoking ban - - - -- Original Message---- - From: John Bjorklund [ mailto: JohnBjorklund @bloomingtonlakeclinic.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 27,2004 3:09 PM To: Jennifer Bennerotte Subject: smoking ban As the medical consultant to the Bloomington division of public health, a long term resident of Edina and as the medical consultant to the Edina public schools I am surprised by the reticence recently shown by the Edina park board on the smoking ban issue. I am astounded that they were not more forceful in their wording of their recommendation with regards to smoking on athletic fields and in parks where youth activities occur. I think a complete ban would be appropriate. There is never a time where smoking is less harmful than another. My candid opinion is either do the ban or don't do anything at all. Any in between choice is less than ideal. Unfortunately I will be out of town at the next council meeting so I felt I should make my own position known. Sincerely, John R. Bjorklund, M.D. 7/28/2004 G -�s -oy P �'tvuj�� 1 11 A-ze zwoqM5 5 17-6q ff\ 5oqq tfl. (oo Oct. — 5-Inazry� JLW� ijdi 01 Date: Summer 2004 To: Dr. Jeff Ho From: Berit Peterson, Health Services Coordinator 952- 848 -4890 be1peterson(@,edina.kl2.mn.us Subject: Edina Schools Health Services Enclosed in a copy to the 2003 -04 Health Services Annual Report. Please note page 18 which address 911 calls and pages 19 -21 which address student injuries. Also, note page 26 which outlines the district CPR plan. The Fire Department is acknowledged on page 24. We called 911 more times this year than any previous year. There were 16 calls, 13 transports. Calls were for staff 5 of the 16 times. I continue to be impressed with the response time and actions of the qualified staff at the Edina Fire Department. When we have had questions regarding responses we have talked with Chief Marty Scheerer who has responded quickly and thoroughly. Please let me know if any of the EMS staff have comments or questions regarding appropriateness of the 911 calls, treatment before EMS arrival, or cooperation after arrival. I would appreciate any opportunity to talk with you on the phone or meet with you. It is important for the EMS staff to know that there is Health Service staff in all the schools when school is in session. The elementary schools have a Health Service Associate who is first aid and CPR trained. They work with nurses who are not on site. The secondary schools have a Licensed School Nurse and a Health Service Associate. The Licensed School Nurse is an RN with a bachelor's degree and a Public Health Nurse Certificate. The nurse at Valley Middle School and I are also First Responders. Keep us in mind as you plan for potential community disasters. Thanks for your continued quality service and collaboration to serve Edina students. L.effert Tigelaar and Barbara Kyle +`+ 5816 Stuart Avenue Edina, MN 55436 Home 952- 920 -1899, L.effert Cell 952- 237 -7340 Dennis Maetzold, Edina Mayor, 4801 West 50's Street Edina, MN 55424 July 22, 2004 Dear Mr. Maetzold; Edina Mayor, As Countryside Elementary School parents and homeowners we want to express our deep concern with Countryside's plan to add an additional parking lot and the plan to change the traffic flow patterns around the school. Our home is adjacent to Countryside, separated in the front by the Stuart Avenue right -of -way. We have a direct view of the school and are affected by the traffic flow in and around the school property. We request your support in examining the need for this project, its long term effectiveness and its fiscal merit in this time of severe budget cuts in public education. By mere coincidence, when we spoke to a sub - contractor on the site last weci end, we becaiat, aware that Countryside is planning to convert current play space use on the west blacktop to a large parking lot for school staff. Because this was a complete surprise to us we called Julie Hatzung, Principal at Countryside, she explained that the staff parking lot (to the east of the school) is short eight parking spaces and therefore eight staff members park in the visitor parking lot to the north of the school bus drop off. In addition to addressing the schools perceived staff parking shortage (because we observe open spots in the visitor lot during the school year) she said that the new parking lot would also promote child safety by re- routing parent pickup and drop -off to the East parking lot. This assumption presumes that a school principal, the janitorial staff and the facilities management team at the school district can make sound traffic safety decisions and have a good understanding of the long term impact and usefulness and how it affects the city and its neighborhoods. She also made it clear that the project will happen before school starts this fall and that she will inform the neighbors when the plans are complete. We feel that it is not enough to just show us the completed plans and that we should demand involvement during the needs assessment and design process of such a drastic change to our neighborhood. We have numerous concerns about the project because it is not based on a thorough needs assessment of actual traffic flow data and it has not included communication with school parents and neighborhood input. At this time without adequate data and discussion of all possible solutions we do not believe this project will be an intelligent and responsible use of the school district's referendum funds. As a professional Public Health Administrator and an Architect we know it is a priority to ensure the safety of our children. However-- it -is- possible that- changing the current- traffic - situation -to a single - focused - -and- unstudied - - -- - -- solution will further compromise our children's safety. To address a public safety issue the proposed engineering change is only one of many possible strategies to truly address safety. It is also critical to educate those involved (parents and students) as well as enforce current rules. It is obvious that the quality of the neighborhood and its livability is also negatively impacted when a large illuminated parking lot surrounded by a. chain - linked fence is perched atop the school greens. The parking lot will become a major focal point for many school neighbors it will also create other nuisances such as lot lighting, car lighting, and noxious fumes (in addition to eliminating play space). These concerns should warrant an immediate halt of this project until a thorough yearlong traffic flow and parking needs study has been completed by independent traffic specialists. The data should be evaluated to develop possible solutions with input from neighbors and parents during the planning process. We feel that this will provide the district, the city, and the neighborhood with the best possible and fiscally responsible long -term solution to guarantee our children's safety. We appreciate your support in following up on our concerns and we are available for further discussion. Sincerely, T i i- Leffert Tigelaar and Barbara Kyle i City of Edina July 28, 2004 Leffert Tigelaar and Barbara Kyle 5816 Stuart Avenue Edina, MN 55436 Dear Mr. Tigelaar and Ms. Kyle: Mayor Maetzold has asked that I respond to your letter of July 22, 2004, with respect to parking lot and traffic flow changes at Countryside Elementary School. I have taken the liberty of forwarding your letter to Kenneth Dragseth, Superintendent of Edina Public Schools. Please understand that decisions with respect to the Countryside. School campus are under the purview of the Edina Public Schools and not the City of Edina. As such, they are in the best position to respond to your concerns. Sincerely, Gordon L. Hughes City Manager - - - -- GLH /dw -- - - - - - -- - - -- - - -- CC: Kenneth Dragseth, Edina Public Schools Jay Willemssen, Edina Public Schools Mayor Maetzold and City. Council City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 NDINA 4TH ON JULY PARADE VOLUNTEER COMMITTEE ''�'�`"_ " 42,01 WELT 50TU !TRENT 55424 952 -2,"9 -0367 WWWWWAPARADE.O1116 www.edinaparade.or9 July 13, 2004 Ms. Ruth Schmoll Edina Fire Department 6250 Tracy Avenue Edina MN 55436 Dear Ruth: Thank you SO0000 much, and a special thank you to the Edina Fire Fighters and their fam- ilies for taking time from your own family holiday to appear in our Edina 4th of July Parade. You were a hit!!!! As I visit with people who saw you in our parade, there's no end to the com- pliments you are receiving. And the role model that you provide for young people in our com- munity goes without saying. Thank you again. Please mark us on your calendars for next year. Have a great summer!! Mary Brindl Entertainment Committee 2004 Edina 4th of July Parade Volunteer Committee 4 Memo Toe Mayor & City Council From: Mike Siitari, Police Chief . Date: 7/23/2004 Re: 2003 Crime Statistics The Bureau of Criminal Apprehension has published their annual crime report for 2003. 1 am pleased to report that Edina had the lowest crime rate of any first or second ring city in Hennepin County. Adjacent communities had crime rates that were 24100% higher then Edina's. The only cities that had a lower crime rate were Deephaven, Corcoran, Dayton and Champlin. I attribute part of this difference to the commitment of the Council and Police Department to proactive traffic enforcement. An active visible patrol force can make a difference in where criminals choose their targets. I believe there is a correlation between our vigorous traffic enforcement and the low crime rate. After 26 years with the Edina Police Department I have also recognized that the Police Department is just one part of the puzzle. Edina residents and businesses make this a special place because of their commitment to keeping this community a safe place to live and work. Community involvement makes a major difference in the crime rate. Working together we can keep Edina one of the safest places to live, work and play. A copy of the crime rate summary sheets for Hennepin County is attached. The numbers can be a bit confusing at first glance. The Part 1, Part 2 and Grand Totals are not the actual number of crimes that were reported. They are the rate per 100,000 inhabitants so all the cities rates can be directly compared to each other. • Page 1 I 1 TABLE 12 MINNESOTA SUMMARY INFORMATION CRIME RATE PER 100,000 INHABITANTS (AND PERCENT CLEARED) - 2003 Agency Population Part 1 Crimes Part 2 Crimes Grand Total Percent Cleared Apple Valley 46,455 3,188 8,042 11,230 49 Lakeville 44,006 2,134 5,520 7,654 62 Dodge County Total 18,092 1,570 11,403 12,973 62 Dodge Co. Sheriff 13,605 1,889 14,201 16,090 64 Kasson 4,487 602 2,920 3,521 34 Douglas County Total 33,490 2,117 5,915 8,032 61 Douglas Co. Sheriff 24,490 1,952 4,777 6,729 48 Alexandria 9,000 2,567 9,011 11,578 82 Faribault County Total 16,511 1,987 2,877 4;863 44 Faribault Co. Sheriff 7,747 1,317 2,027 3,343 44 Blue Earth 3,695 4,195 6,522 10,717 47 Elmore 750 3,733 4,267 8,000 22 Wells 2.545 - _ _ _ Winnebago 1,518 2.372 2,635 5,007 49 Frost 256 2,734 1,953 4,688 17 Fillmore County Total 21,552 682 1,531 2,213 45 Freeborn County Total 33,248 1,838 4,500 6,337 70 Freeborn Co. Sheriff 14,518 854 2,452 3,306 72 Albert Lea 18,730 2,600 6.086 8,687 70 Goodhue County Total 44,395 3,284 6,140 9,424 49 Goodhue Co. Sheriff 21,233 1,517 2,506 4,022 44 Cannon Falls 3,872 7,619 9,298 16,916 47 Red Wing 16,444 4,555 9.341 13,896 48 Zumbrota 2,846 3,233 10,471 13,703 67 Grant County Total 6,417 1,683 7,776 9,459 31 Hennepin County Total 1,141,347 4,421 6,323 10,744 40 Hennepin Co. Sheriff 10,661 1,623 9,014 10,637 62 Bloomington 86,907 4;301 4,651 8,952 53 BrookIyn Center 29;767 7,673 6,551 14,224 50 Brooklyn Park 68,761 4,789 .7,347 12,136 41 Crystal 23,160 3,908 4,003 7,910. 48 Dee haven - Woodland 4,421 746 3,189 3,936 54 Edina. 48,391 2,267 1 2,017 4;284 44_ South Lake Minnetonka 12,315 1,608 5,895 7,503 58 Golden Valley 20,694 3,552 5,504. 9,056 51 Hopkins 17,495 1,583 3,184 4,767 50 Minneapolis 390,415 6,447 9,520 15,997. 32 Minnetonka 52,346 2,478 2,860 5,338 50 Mound 9,627 2,711 6,721 9,432 56 New Hoe 21,298 2,874 5,339 8,212 54 Orono 11,949 1,548 3,607 5,155 53 Osseo 2,483 765 7,612 8,377 88 Plymouth 67,236 2,790 3,871 6,662. 39 Richfield 35,140 3,671 5,484 9,155 54 Robbinsdale 14,411 4,504 6,814 11,318 46 St Anthony 8,175 3,939 4,000 7,939 53 St. Louis Park 45,026 3,596 4,522 8,118 42 Wayzata 4,196 4,099 5,195 9,295 37 Univ. of Minnesota PD -M ls. (B) - _ _ 44 Metro Airport PD (B) 48 TABLE 12 MINNESOTA SUMMARY INFORMATION CRIME RATE PER 100,000 INHABITANTS (AND PERCENT CLEARED) - 2003 Agency Population Part 1 Crimes Part 2 Crimes Grand Total Percent Cleared Wayzata 4.196 4,099 5.195 9.295. 37 Univ. of Minnesota PD -Mpls. (B) - _ _ 44 Metro Airport PD (B) - - - _ Eden Prairie 56,020 2.562 3,017 5.578 47 Maple Grove 51,391 2,901 4.318 7.219 45 Minnetrista 6,358 2,139 5.757 7,896 64 Cham hn 22,645 543 1.060 1.603 55 Medina 4,087 1,468 5,652 7,120 68 Corcoran 5.744 749 1.323 1072 19 Dayton 4,795 501 2.231 2,732 76 West Hennepin 5,433 1,307 5.724 7,031 66 Three Rivers Park District (B) - Houston Countv Total 20,120 1,446 7,714 9,160 62 Houston Co. Sheriff 9,147 1.498 10,419 11,916 60 Caledonia 3.025 2,050 9.851 11,901 65 La Crescent 5,023. 1.832 5,992 7,824 64 Hubbard County Total 18,750 4,032, 9,856 13,888 59 Hubbard Co. Sheriff 15,408 2,674 7,626 10,300 57 Park Rapids 3.342 10.2931 20,138 30,431 64 Isanti County Total 31,925 2,202 3,731 5,933 51 Isanti Co. Sheriff 26.293 1,118 2,267 3,385 51 Cambridge 5,632 7,262 10.565 17,827 52 Itasca County Total 44,889 1,441 4,647 6,088 '60 Itasca Co. Sheriff 36,966 1,631 5,124 6,755 59 Grand Rapids 7,923 555 2,423 2,979 76 Jackson County Total 11,498 2,357 4,488 6,845 32 Jackson Co. Sheriff 6,170 1,021 1,848 2,869 19 Jackson PD 3,572 5,263 10,302 15,566 33 Lakefield 1,756 1,139 1,936 3.075 67 Kanabec County Total 15,301 3,183 5,836 9,019 42 K.anabec Co. Sheriff . 12,043 2,400 3,380 5,779 23 Mora 3,258 6,077 14,917 20,994 61 Kand yohi County Total 42,043 3,004 3,910 6,914 55 Kandi ohi Co. Sheriff 23,318 1,818 2,200 4,018 48 Willmar 18,725 4,481 6,040 10,521 58 Kittson County Total 5,393 1,428 6,842 8,270 75 Kittson Co. Sheriff 4,172 1.846 8,845 10,690 75 Hallock 1,221 - Koochichinr County Total 14,648 2,553 6,281 8,834 26 Koochiching Co. Sheriff 7,808 1,563 3,676 5.238 26 International Falls 6.840 3,684 9,254 12.939 26 Lac Qui Parl County Total 8,232. 1,008 1,992 3,000 42 Lac Qui Parle Co. Sheriff 4,858 1.132 2,470 3,602 45 Dawson 1,570 1,783 2,484 4.268 30 Madison 1.804 - 277 277 100 Lake County Total 11,283 1.418 2,641 4,059 59 Lake Co. Sheriff 5,486 2.133 3.354 5,487 53 Silver Bay 2,110 664 758 1,422 33 Two Harbors 3,687 787 2,658 3,445 80 M July 2, 2004 Edina City Council 4801 West 50'' Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear City Council Members: The reason for our letter today is to voice our concerns over the 44th and France Redevelopment Plan, which is to be, revisited during the July 6 City Council Meeting. We are concerned, as are many of our neighbors, as to the nature of the Redevelopment Plan as well as the impact certain development may have on the Morningside neighborhood. It is not that we are adverse to any redevelopment in the area; we are actually requesting involvement in the process as concerned citizens, proud Morningside residents and Edina taxpayers. As we understand, the Edina City Council approved the Redevelopment Plan in 1990. Nearly 15 years later, the same Plan is being moved forward without input, concern for or information from the homeowners and families with whom the changes would most effect. Not to mention those nine residential and twelve business dwellings which will be either eliminated or altered beyond current recognition. Not only is the Redevelopment Plan infringing on personal property but is also outdated and has not addressed other major issues such as effect to the neighborhood, i.e.: traffic, scale of redevelopment or type of retail and housing space. Therefore, we are requesting a halt in further movement of the 44h and France Redevelopment Plan till the Edina City Council Members meet and discuss this issue with the Morningside Neighborhood Association. you. Sincerely, k W m McGo44`h Street Edina, MN 55424 5808 Mait Lane Edina, MN 55436 July 30, 2004 City Council Edina, MN 55436 Dear Council, I am totally in favor of a ban on smoking in our city parks. Smoke from cigars and cigarettes are triggers for my asthma as I am sure it is for many people. Smoking is a choice and asthma is not. Smokers should only smoke in places that are designated and that are out. of the way of people who have breathing problems or who do not choose to smoke. Another reason I favor a ban is that we should set an example for our youth that we do not think smoking is a healthful activity and that we want to protect them from second hand smoke. Our city parks are full of fresh air and I would like to keep it that way. Sincerely, } C- Carol Miller Page 1 of 1 Darlene Wallin From: Jennifer Bennerotte Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 4:02 PM To: Darlene Wallin Cc: Gordon Hughes Subject: FW: Addressed to Edina City Council members - Upcoming meeting regarding Tobacco Free Parks For Edina - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Richard C Lussky [mailto:lussk001 @umn.edu] Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 3:36 PM To: Jennifer Bennerotte Cc: Richard C Lussky Subject: Addressed to Edina City Council members - Upcoming meeting regarding Tobacco Free Parks For Edina Dear Members of the Edina City Council, I am a resident of Edina, and as a professional I take care of children and newly born infants. I am strongly in support of a policy to make all Edina parks tobacco free. In addition to the general public (including children) health benefits of such a measure, there is also scientifically sound evidence of benefit to babies inutero (fetuses). When dealing with children the underlying premise should be stressed that they are at a higher risk for developing long -term complications related to environmental tobacco exposure because of their physiologic immaturity (i.e., they can't metabolize and excrete toxins as readily as adults) and a longer lifetime over which such exposures can manifest as disease. Additionally, from a pregnant mother perspective: there are studies that have shown linkages between maternal environmental exposure to tobacco (where the mother is not smoking, but is being exposed to environmental smoke) and the following: gene mutations in newbom white blood cells, an increased risk for premature delivery, decreased birth weight, and one study showing an average decrease in height of 0.5 inches at 5 years of age. The medical evidence is overwhelming to show the benefits of eliminating environmental tobacco exposure to pregnant mothers, children, and families. I sincerely hope that you pass this policy. If you have any questions for me, please don't hesitate to contact me through my office number: (612) 873 -2960. 1 sincerely appreciate your thoughtful consideration of my comments. I look forward to seeing you August 17th. Thank you, Rich Lussky M.D. Richard C. Lussky M.D., FAAP Co- Medical Director, Newborn Intensive Care Unit Medical Director, Infant Apnea and Pulmonary Program Hennepin County Medical Center Minneapolis, Minnesota State Volunter Chair, March of Dimes' Prematurity Prevention Campaign Phone: (612) 873 -2960 Fax: (612) 904 -4284 8/3/2004 07 -26 -04 08:47am From -city of Edina T -980 P.001 /005 F -439 FAX CUVER" ' SFIEET FAX NO. (952)$26 -0390 CITY OF EDINA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE: July 26, 2004 TIME: 8 :55 AM TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES (INCLUDING THIS COVER SHEET): 4 TO: Scot Housh FIRM NAME: FAX NUMBER: 763 -302 -7200 FROM: Wayne Houle 952 - 826 -0443 COMMENTS: Steve Lillehaug our Traffic Engineer spoke to John Lynch at the Normandale Branch and received this reply. We haven't asked specifically if these boxes could be moved to the home, but will be making this request today. In reading this information I would say that the City has many boxes not in compliance, i.e. Vernon Ave., Gleason Road, and Blake Road. Contact me if you need anything else. Thanks PLEASE CONTACT ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AT 952 -826 -0371 IF TRANSMISSION IS INCOMPLETE OR CANNOT BE READ. 07 -26 -04 08:47am From -city of Edina NaffrmrAW& Owich W oe weal70' Ond Ram WIN 554arro e Fax 9 F'I+h orw 8621 150 4Q 1(e [ o rr ev v 3`� 11 �ec NV�a k 1 t3 diCe S �. T -980 P.002/005 F -439 pww Pho Oat= no Cal 0 UlVeM AE°r RwMw G Ph e" Cawmat V Plpw ROW Q Pg w Rewde • Contnlsedw Ar � ��� �� � •�- dye c�;Q, � lar �- � �K� d° ,no -(�- �,,., 4,av U ,M1v b � ca m � • d.G tee �- 5 `; k ' y--F �� GtJ' rrCr.+'� c�e �. ,t�.ra/ ►S G J r -6 s � Govt VGr i� -a a �� �aSr G f r. • r • � .rlr.• �J�r�. ...A ✓. 1 • rr R�OrT /�'. t�J. I I 07 -26 -04 08:47am From -city of Edina T -980 P.003/005 F -439 CORRECT METHOD OF MAIL BOX INSTALLATION FOR CITY DELIVERY HEIGHT: 45 - +48 INCHES ABOVE THE STREET LEVEL, HAVE BOX EXTEND AS FAR IN FRONT OF SUPPORT POST AS POSSIBLE. (THIS REDUCES RISK OF SNOW PLOW DAMAGE.) ADDRESS MUST BE ON SIDE; OF BOX FROM WHICH CARRIER APPROACHES, IN LETTERS ABOUT ON (1) INCH HIGH (OR ON FRON OF BOX IN CASES WHERE BOXES ARE GROUPED.) BOX MUST BE LOCATED 90 THAT THE CARRIER CAN SERVE WITHOUT LEAVING THE VEHICLE. CUSTOMERS MUST KEEP THE APPROACH TO THEIR MAILBOXES CLEAR OF DESTRUCTIONS TO ALLOW SAFE ACCESS FOR DELIVERY. IF LISPS EMPLOYEES ARE IMPEDED IN REACHING A MAIL RECEPTACLE, THE POSTMASTER MAY WITH DRAW DELIVERY SERVICE: 163 E. COON r,4- OQ •y � ��II �j1.% i .aya � � li �� _ _ � Page 7 I 07 -26 -04 08:47am From -city of Edina T -980 P.004/005 F -439 Cuntorner Map ReoeptM9GS W1 ?.3 10 ,A _.. _ .. .. _ Dppp Basic Information b040 Delivery of Mall W41 Customer Mail Receptacles Summary D041 describes the standards for letteftne or otlaer receptacles for the dept or recelpt of mall. it aim contains the standards for ourbelde rnaib mwo. 1.0 BASIC STANDARDS Au ftrized &zapt as excluded by 1.2, every letterbox or oilier rem intended or used for Dopoaltory the reoelpt or delivery of mail an any ft delivery route, rural delivery rouge, hthway contract route. or afiter mall route is designated an auMoriied depository for mail within fire meaning of 1 a U80 1702,1705,17013. and 1726. Exdtr®IoM® Door dolts and nonlod"a bins ortroughs used with aparkru nt house maflbcoaes 1.2 are not last rbom wlth4r the meaning of 1a USC 1725 and are rent private read mmtades forte MWairds for mafiable matter not bearing pose found in or on private maA receptaces. The post or other support is not part of the mcop%ft Use for Mall lxpt under 211, the reaNAades descrtbed In 1.1 may be used only for matter 1.3 bearing posftge. Otter f n as Permed by 2.10 or 2.1 1, no part of a mail . moeptade may be used to deNer any matter not bearing poste, MdLdng itwu or ntaltar placed upon, supparthd by, aita td to, hang from, or inserted btfra a mad MCOP le matter not bew" postage and lbund as described lau IS to flab passage as would be paid if it were carded by man Clear Approach CtrSorrteits must ]aaep the apprtoach to their mailboxes dear of obstrudione to I A allow ad# erxess for daaverl. ff LISPS employees arc Impeded in reacft a mad mcepta de, the postmaster may Mhftw doMw servke. 2.0 CURBSIDE MAILBOXES NWmu* oturer Marnrti7aob t M of all malbxes dealgned and made to be erected at the edge of a SpeclTlcatlone roadway or curbside cf a street and to be served by a canter from a vehicle on any 2.1 city routei rural mul s, or t VmW =cant route must obtain appmval of their PMdude under LISPS Standard 7. Ab116caaw� CAfyand IfiuW Cutb31de To nacelle ahead aaratrucdon standards and drawings or other k*wn ation about am mantbtrm3 of curter Rfallb MM wdW to USPS EnginewkQ (see GM for address). CuMmnDuht ThO beet P0stMWW mOV appFM a Curbelde rnalib= consbuoted by a customer Mallbox who, forasslhetfc or other reaso . do= not wot to use an approved 2.2 monufmdur ed born. Thu custom -built tot must generapy meet the eame standards 03 maMd3dured boxes for flag, size, wengtr, and quality of construcftL Address Idendittetion 9sry curbside melboor must bear ttte following address information: 2.3 a. A bmr number, it used, ht mribed in aonttaWng coiar in now letters and numerals at lent 1 Inch high an the side of the box *Tde to the carriers regular approack or on the door ff bcoasa am groupecL b. A house number if street names and house numbers have beers assigned by local KMorIVe% and ftre posfma W a;<U t fts their use as a poft addrthsa. if the boa Is on a d Rent street from the nuathmees rem, the street name and ease number must be inscribed on the Mm. DUM kOW 30 CM 04M Da 07 -26 -04 08:48am From -city of Edina T -980 P.005/005 F -439 WAD04` 4 _,. Cuatomer Mail Receptsotes Owner's Name The main= may bear the owner's n=e. 8.4 Advertising Any advertising on s mailbox or its support is prohlblted. 2.5 Mailbox Post The past or other support for a curbside nWlbax must be neat and of adequate 2.6 strength and size. The post mepf not repmsW effigies or caricatum thst tend to dlspamee or ridicule any person. The bolt may be ab¢tched to a fixed or movable arm. Location SW *d 10 state laws and wgubUoM a ourbside mania must be placed to allow sale and convenient derAftry by canters without leaving their vehicles. The box must be an the right -hard side of to road in the cilreeftri of travel of the ramie on any now rural route or highway oo""d route, In all cases where traffic conditions are dangerous for the catriars to diteto the left to reach the box, or whore *H* doling so would violate ftft laws and regulatlans. Moue Than One If more than one tamliy wishes to share a mall MCSPbW% the fbilowing stanolards Family apply; 18 a. Routs and Boot Number Addressing. On rural and highway ppntraot routes aUftrtred MJ use s horde and box numbering system (e.B., RR 1 SM 155), UP to ON %Riles may ahave a ak g& map NcepUde and use a common nests and box designation. A written notice of agroaMen% signed by the heads of tt» WnIlles or Individuals who want to Jain In the use of such bohc, must be OW with the postmaster at the delivery of ift N Carnaahxlon to Street Name and Number Addressing. When *eat name and numbeling sysoems are a,dopmd,1hosa aaddmam railed di tutot eugonrer locadiom and ssquenwse Aural w1d hWmW contrast route cu st+ mmm who are aseigned dit mM primary addh isses (6.%. 723 APPLE WAY vs. 138 APPLE WAY) should meet Ghdjv uid mall receptacles In locaftons recommended by their postmasters and boon using their new addresses, Ct'g°mwm hmft ciftrent primary addresses who wish to oondnue wring a connmon Meptade must use the address of Me receptaeleft owner and tho "care oP address 1hrmst: JOHN 170E CIO ROBIM SMITH 123 APPLE WAY Customers having a common primary adaless (e.W. SW MAIN ST) but dit mint secondary addressee fag,, APT 101, APT 102, arc,) may coftue to share a common recapthde if singpoint delivery is authorized for the Pl'imary address. Secondary arldmsses should still be tnokded In all cormapondenom Locked Box 2.9 A majkm with a lock must have a slot that is large enough to aocommodate the cull mWa ramial dally mall volume. The LISPS nell her opens a laded box nor accepts a key for this purp0e. Delivery of NevvsPa� QanendllK cuibelde matlbarms arc to he used for mall only. However, publishers of nawspapars re malled as Period2cWa may, on Sundays and national 2.1 ace c pia o W � place of t1a Sunday or holiday Muse In the rural nsft &W o gay aor MO mute boom of subacdbers If those mples arc removed from the, boxes IIE6m the next scheduled day of mall dellveryt D`90 DMH Irtsue so w"M o. , -- cot Ho u e Yl CD(M-h Dbv of < s t)1 Su ha� -7 . =:�� T-d *loco -Zb6 (296) siionoa zzajg eBZ :OT b0 TZ inr MDBWDP tto'er ,r MINNESOTA DEVELOPMENTAL BASKET LL Sv'�'i� www.mdbbalf.com 2004 Boys & Girls Summer Basketball League Bays & Girls Grades 4th through 9th Session: Weeks of: I Format: # 1 June 14, 21 & 28 #2 July 12, 19 &26 # 3 August 2, 9 :::16 League Times: Iq 2:00- 3:15pm 3:15- 4:30pm Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Grade 4 & 5 Boys Grade 4 & 5 Girls Grade 6 Girls Grade 6 Boys Grade 7 Boys Grede,Z-Qids Grade 8 & 9 Girls Grade 8 & 9 Boys • 4 vs 4 play • Form your own team or sign up individually and be placed on a team • All games consist of two 10 minute halves • At least two games per day Cost- • 130.00 per session before .tune 7, $35.00 per session after June 7 Locations: Bloomington - The Edge in Minnetonka /Plymouth For More Information... 952/346 -8866 wwwwwwwwrru.. w, wiyrwiwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww League He -dstration Form Mail to: MDB - 2050 West 96th Street - Bloomington, MN 55431 Name Address City /State/Zip Parent Name(s) Home Ph.Mork Ph. Email Address Grade, Fall '04 T -shirt size (Sm., M, L, XL (Adult sizes)] Names of Athletes on your team: 1) Session(s) [circle] 1 2 3 2) Amount Due: $ 3) Credit Card Payment: Expiration Date Location OFFICE USE Date Recd Amount Check # 2'd t060-2b6 (296) siiono0 22aj0 LB2 :OT b0 12 Znr MCWD 509 Plan Revisions U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Feasibility Study Public Process Michael Wyatt MCWD Planner Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Why ? ?? 1. Public Process z. Lower Watershed Plan 3. U.S. Army Corps Feasibility Study 4. MCWD Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan (509 Plan) Goal of Public Process To provide a forum for representatives from the community to provide input on the development of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District 509 Plan Revisions and long-term management of the creek • Directly involve District Cities and Hennepin County • Engage local constituency to document values associated with area water resources • Assemble a technical team to assist in development of a feasible plan recommendation 1 FWlalCar.eweaskingforfromthe City? or the process through a Joint D Resolution • Appointment of one elected official, one technical staff member, two interested citizens • Consideration of the final product of the public process — there are no obligations after process is completed ,.b.em ••�!!M1"< 4dr1'MIO �r.wne�.wnaµ Projected Outcome Presentation of a recommended plan of action for the Minnehaha Creek (Lower) Watershed which Incorporates local values and Interests as well as community consensus • Within the framework of the existing goals per MCWD Board direction • Evaluation of potential watershed scenarios • Will provide for long -term resource planning for Minnehaha Creek inq,m imp •�YYhw}�WWf1Hi�iFq •.- wwc,yw.,wase FElected Participants/Project Partners levels of involvement: cials • Oversig ht of Citizen Committee • Final Recommendation 2. Appointed Citizens • Plan Development 3. Technical Committee • Advisory RAI Meeting Coordination • Each Citizen decision ;I LCWD Board tt subject to a technical review Elecu:d:OfflcWla •Final recommendation ' Te2hnlcal:Group AppoGrted t7thens. subject to the approval of the Elected Officials and submitted to MCWD Board ,..f.�� p(Iwt tgata � +••.w•ryw.,wnav Elected Officials • Includes representatives of District Cities, Hennepin County, Minneapolis Parks 6 Recreation Board, MCWD Board • Explores political feasibility of recommendations • Meets quarterly to review recommendations • Submits final recommendation to the MCWD Board s ,,�,� s.�nra•i �mvWl•W �w- wwnawm.o+n��w Fn!neAppointed Citizens y project partners -two per partner, D; 23 total o mmended actions • Explores social feasibility of recommendations • Meets every other week - twelve meetings total Technical Committee • Consists of technical representatives of each of the protect partners In addition to representatives from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Pollution Control Agency, Department of Health, United States Fish 6 Wildlife Service and the United States Amry Corps of Engineers • Explores technical feasibility of recommended actions, provides comments, revises plans and plan alternatives • Convenes on as needed basis, most likely four to five meetings I J,uN rml � M•4 PMI"�^�r74� Meeting Format Three Phases: 1. Watershed Education (Meetings 14) • Goat: Inform and educatethe general group on relevant Issues concerning existing and future condltlons of the watershed • Outcome: Group will be prepared to evaluate extting MCWD information and make an Informed recommendation regarding the MCWD role In managing area resources 2. Watershed Scenarios (Meetings 5.8) • Goal: Present and discuss different scenarios of watershed management • Outcome: Development of a preliminary plan for review by Technical Commktee s. Final Plan Development (Meetings 9-12) • Goal: Review and revise technical recornmendadons • Outcome: Final Plan recommendation for presentatlon to elected officials r.�wru•. • Ybwl itnYiitpNO bT fto+44— e—rlM i Conceptual Scenarios • Business -As -Usual • Maintenance of Status Quo (with' Developed Conditions) • Maximization of Recreational Benefits • Ecological Restoration J,uipnrml IPaYhbrd 6rWlYb wm4 e.arlxus•evar4µ 4 Business -As -Usual Model Completed with HHPLS Benefits • L>:tts 1. Reduce Number of Flood i. Potential Adverse Impacts Problem Areas Associated with Water r. Reduced Costs on Quality, Ecological Development' Construction =ty, Downstream Projects s. Uttle Impact on Taxpayers r. May Run Contrary to the At -Large ' _ Revised Goals of MCWD s. TMDL's Unaddressed .. Cities Assume All Costs of Water Quality Improvements from PCA Regulation ,.w,mi t�!!lttE't 16..+1.�t ,�- ww..rlrr".aror�v Maintenance of the Status Quo Bsallts ,. ProJects =p don an -As NeMeO' Bads Mlnlmise Casts Associated with Development short-term Benefit for Taxpayers MaJorlry of h..-X.- Waterbodies Xave Met Target Loatllna Goals, Development In Lower Basin Is ProJeoMO to Be Minimal In Future =11tions - Mlnlrnal Irrvesvr,ent to Maintain Status Ouo i Inveased Costs Associated with Retrofits t May Not Be Able to Adequatery Predict the Effects of Development Water OuMity Must Decline for Protects to Be tmpiemented a Embgiral Integ�*fSystem V101 Most Ukey Decline arM Go Unaddressed Examples of "Status Quo" -type Projects • Stormwater Ponds • Grit Chambers • Alum Treatments ` X • Stabilization of Eroded Streambank/Lakeshore • Projects are applied on an "as needed' basis ,.ww,m, �sbrd I�akl�Yab , +�.a.•rswe..mrers,h Gi u Examples of `Recreation" -type Projects • Canoe Launches • Phosphorus Management — IrnLake and Upstream Management • Pathogen Managemenl/Pubiic Health • Fishing Access to Area Resources • Woody Debris Removal — Navigadonal Access • Reevaluation of Grays Bay Dam Discharge :{d c qe��Z Ecosystem Restoration Benefits �. Focus on increased Ecological Integrity z. Increased Streambank Stability. Reduced Scour /Erosion s. Create a System of Connectivity •. Increased Ecological Diversity, Improved Fishery • Costs i. Increased Ecological Benefits May Not Always Result In Increased Water Quality/Clarity z. Increased Restrictions /Regulation on Stormwater Discharges s. Identified 'Problem' Flooding Area May Not Be Addressed with Plan �wo+orl�.a✓orl�/• � d.- aawsw.,aro.s�r i I Al ation of Recreational Benefits F S ,K• eased Water i. Increased Water ational Use Quality/Clarity Does Not . ability of Always Result In Area Resources Ecological Benefits s. Increased Stewardship of z. Ecological Integrity of Local Users System May Decline s. Increased Restrictions/Regulation of Stormwater Discharges ,•. Streambank Stability May Not Be Addressed/May Decline '"'p'm � �IF�1MI1 +sWwNlw`..a�WI4` Examples of `Recreation" -type Projects • Canoe Launches • Phosphorus Management — IrnLake and Upstream Management • Pathogen Managemenl/Pubiic Health • Fishing Access to Area Resources • Woody Debris Removal — Navigadonal Access • Reevaluation of Grays Bay Dam Discharge :{d c qe��Z Ecosystem Restoration Benefits �. Focus on increased Ecological Integrity z. Increased Streambank Stability. Reduced Scour /Erosion s. Create a System of Connectivity •. Increased Ecological Diversity, Improved Fishery • Costs i. Increased Ecological Benefits May Not Always Result In Increased Water Quality/Clarity z. Increased Restrictions /Regulation on Stormwater Discharges s. Identified 'Problem' Flooding Area May Not Be Addressed with Plan �wo+orl�.a✓orl�/• � d.- aawsw.,aro.s�r i I Al Examples of "Ecosystem Restoration" -type Projects • Wetiand Restoration — Vegetative Restoration • Sioengineered ,J Streambanks /Canopy Restoration • Flow Distribution Over Wetland Areas • Removal of Grade Control Structures a• • Reevaluation of Grays Bay Dam Discharges FACitizen Outcomes of Public Process reated Value- Engi neered Plan dation — Community Consensus • Acknowledgement and Approval from Local Elected Officials • The Basis of the Lower Watershed (Minnehaha Creek Subwatershed) Management Plan • A Draft List of Projects for the U.S. Army Corps Feasibility Study 'k +'•v �yfM� � kk 9 tT Questions ? ?? 7 DRAFT RESOLUTION TO CREATE A NIINNEHAHA CREEK PARTNERSHIP WHEREAS, Minnehaha Creek is a highly valued stream flowing from Lake Minnetonka to the Mississippi River; and WHEREAS, the preservation and enhancement of the Minnehaha Creek Corridor is a high - priority expressed in the comprehensive plans for each of the cities along the Creek, and the Water Resources Management Plan of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District; and WHEREAS, urbanization in the Minnehaha Creek Watershed has led to the degradation of the stream's flow regime, habitat and water quality, but the Creek has high potential for restoration; and WHEREAS, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District completed in 2003 a detailed Hydrologic/Hydraulic and Pollutant Loading Study, and a Minnehaha Creek Stream Assessment; and WHEREAS the MCWD will undertake revisions to its Watershed Management Plan in partnership with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Feasibility Study to explore the potential federal interest for Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration and Flood Damage Reduction in the Minnehaha Creek Corridor; WHEREAS, the [MCWD] [City of ] desires to partner with the other communities along the Creek to seek protection and restoration of the Minnehaha Creek Corridor; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the [MCWD] [City of ] supports the formation of a partnership to provide guidance and recommendations on policy development, technical issues, and public involvement to create a common vision and implementation plan for the Minnehaha Creek Corridor, to be organized as follows: Partnership Composition The partnership will comprise the following partners: • City of Minnetonka; • City of Hopkins; • City of St. Louis Park; • City of Edina; • City of Minneapolis; • Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board; • Hennepin County; and • Minnehaha Creek Watershed District 2. Policy Board a. The partnership Policy Board will comprise a member of the governing body of each of the partner organizations. b. The Policy Board will generally meet quarterly as needed and pursuant to an established project schedule and work plan. 3. Technical Advisory Committee a. The Technical Advisory Committee will provide technical review and recommendations to the partnership and will comprise a staff representative from each of the partner organizations, and a representative from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Minnesota Department of Health and such other governmental agencies having a technical interest and expertise to offer for the benefit of the Minnehaha Creek Corridor. b. The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District technical representative will serve as the Chair of the Technical Advisory Committee. c. The Technical Advisory Committee will generally meet monthly as needed pursuant to the established project work schedule and work plan. 4. Public Advisory Committee a. The Public Advisory Committee will comprise two citizen representatives designated by each partner organization, and up to seven other representatives of stakeholder organizations named by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District to represent conservation, property owner, development, and recreational interests in the Minnehaha Creek Watershed appointed by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed through an open application process. b. The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District will designate one of its Board Members to serve as Chair to the Public Advisory Committee. c. The Public Advisory Committee will generally meet monthly as needed pursuant to the established project schedule and work plan. 5. Legal Authority It is understood that the decisions and activities of the partnership are advisory only, and will not have any binding legal authority on any of the partnership's members. The parties to the partnership expect that recommendations developed and approved by the partnership will be duly considered and acted upon by the governing body of the respective the partnership members. 6. Term The partnership will meet and work for an initial period of three (3) years, concluding on or before March 1, 2007, subject to a determination to renew the work of the partnership by each of its partner organizations. 44th & France Redevelopment Community Response Some Chanqe (27) NO Development (263)