Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2004-08-17_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL AUGUST 17, 2004 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Commissioner, Council Member or citizen so requests it. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the Agenda.. * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA - Regular Meeting of August 3, 2004. II. ADTOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL SISTER KENNY INSTITUTE GOLF PROGRAM FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH PHYSICAL :DISABILITIES DAY. PROCLAIMED --KEY MOUSE DAY PROCLAIMED I. II.. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of August 3, 2004. EASEMENTS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. 1 Motion to close hearing. If Council wishes rollcall of Council Members required to pass. Rollcall A. VACATION OF ALLEY - 308 Blake Road proceed, comment heard. n 3/5 favorable III. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS - Zoning Ordinances: First Reading requires affirmative rollcall votes of three Council members except that a rezoning from residential to non - residential requires four affirmative votes. Second Reading requires affirmative rollcall votes of three of Council to pass except rezoning from residential to non- residential requires four affirmative votes. Waiver of Second Reading: Affirmative rollcall votes of four members of Council to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: Affirmative rollcall vote of three Council members required passing. Conditional Use Permit: Affirmative rollcall vote of three Council members required to pass. Variance Appeal: Favorable rollcall of Council Members present to uphold or deny appeal * A. TECHNICAL CORRECTION TO WALLINGFORD ADDITION FINAL PLAT - 5101 West 70th Street, Resolution No. 2004 -73 and Ordinance No. 850 -A25 Rollcall B. ORDINANCE NO. 850 -11- Amending Edina Code Section 850.21 Floodplain Regulations Rollcall Rollcall f 1 Agenda /Edina City Council AUGUST 17, 2004 Page 2 C. PRELIMINARY REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT 5125 49th Street West (Mark Jones /Thea Lucy Marshall) IV. ORDINANCES - First Reading: Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second Reading: Favorable rollcall vote of three Council members to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: Affirmative vote of four Council members to pass. A. ORDINANCE NO. 850-12 -. Amending Edina Code Section 140 changing the name of the. Human Relations Commission V. REPORTS/ RECOMMENDATIONS A. Traffic Safety Staff Review of August 5, 2004 B. Tobacco -Free Park Policy C. Braemar Athletic Field Facility Proposal Park Board Recommendation D. Endorsement of Appointment to Nine Mile Creek Watershed District VI. FINANCE A. CONFIRMATION. OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS As per Pre -List dated August 4, 2004, TOTAL $907,182.62; and August 11, 2004, TOTAL $1,405,739.79. VII. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS VIII. CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS A. Laura Plaetzer -. Length of Parking in Residential Neighborhood IX. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES X. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL XI. MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEM Mon Sep 6 LABOR DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed Tues Sep 7 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Sep 14 PRIMARY ELECTION DAY - POLLS OPEN 7:00 A.M. UNTIL 8:00 P.M. Tues Sep 21 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Oct 5 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Oct 19 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mon Nov 1 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Nov 2 GENERAL ELECTION DAY - POLLS OPEN 7:00 A.M. UNTIL 8:00 P.M. Thur Nov 11 VETERANS DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed Tues Nov 16 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Thur. Nov 25 THANKSGIVING DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed Fri Nov 26 DAY AFTER THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed Memo To: Mayor Maetzold and Members of the City Council From: Gordon Hughes Date: August 10, 2004 Re: 2005 CITY BUDGET Attached herewith is the proposed 2005 City of Edina budget. This proposed budget is based upon forecasts presented to you during our budget planning workshop. We trust that this budget reflects the guidelines established by the Council during these meetings. State Aids Nearly all Minnesota cities have been affected by State Aid reductions enacted during past legislative sessions. State aids for cities comprise Local Government Aid (LGA) and Market Value Homestead Credit (MVHC). Although Edina has not been the recipient of LGA for several years, we have received MVHC. Pursuant to past legislation, Edina lost its entire 2003 and 2004 MVHC allocations. Despite these cuts, the fiscal impact to Edina has been less than nearly every other city in Minnesota simply because we receive very little state aid in relation to our overall budget. MVHC is scheduled to be restored to the City in 2005. However, it is very important to note that State funding for the 2005 MVHC program will not be considered until the 2005 legislature meets in January. Therefore, cities have no assurance that the 2005 MVHC will actually be funded. I am pessimistic that it will be funded considering the ongoing fiscal problems with the State. Levy Limits The City has been subject to state imposed levy limits for several years. In prior years the levy limit was a function of the prior year's levy adjusted by household growth, C/I growth and an inflationary adjustment. For the 2004 budget, the levy limit was even more restrictive than prior years. The City could not increase its levy due to inflation or household and C/I growth - we could only increase our levy to recover 60% of the MVHC that had been cut for 2004. Therefore, our 2004 budget required a number of significant expenditure and non -tax revenue adjustments in order to comply with the State - imposed levy limit and loss of MVHC. Levy limits have been eliminated by the State for 2005. Therefore, the Council may establish a property tax levy without restrictions by the State. In our opinion, this gives the City an opportunity to consider two significant changes to our General Fund budget. First, I recommend that the City base its budget on the assumption that the MVHC program will not be funded for 2005 and, therefore, the City should levy accordingly. This approach will presumably safeguard the City from future dependency on State aids, which are subject to legislative uncertainties from year to year. Secondly, I recommend that the 0 Page 1 City not issue equipment certificates (a form of borrowing) in 2005 but instead include the full cost of our equipment replacement program within the General Fund. This will save interest expense that need not be incurred. We issued two year certificates in 2003 as a way to manage our budget within the constraints imposed by very restrictive levy limits. Lifting of levy limits for 2005 gives the City an opportunity to restore the equipment replacement expense as a General Fund item. The above noted items will require restraint with respect to other expenditures in order to present a reasonable budget. I believe the 2005 Budget that we have prepared represents a responsible approach to providing for the City's needs while placing it in the best possible position for future years. EXPENDITURES The proposed 2005 General Fund Expenditures are $24,038,621 which represents a 6.32 percent increase from 2004. It is very important to understand that our recommendation with respect to not issuing equipment certificates in 2005 has the effect of increasing expenditures in the General Fund. If the City elected to issue such certificates in 2005, General Fund expenditures would increase only 3.67% and our debt service funds would increase by a corresponding amount. The "bottom line" effect of this change is negligible to the taxpayer. Chart 1 compares the proposed 2005 expenditure increase with past increases. 10.00% m 8.00% t 6.00% 4.00% m IL 2.00% 0.00% Chart 1 9.96% 1.90% 6.32% 2002 2003 2004 2005 Year The Council may recall that the 2004 budget implemented a number of accounting changes required by GASB 34. (GASB an abbreviation for Government Accounting Standards Board.) The GASB standards require us to account and budget for pensions, social security and worker's compensation benefits in a different manner than prior years. The Council should bear these accounting changes in mind when comparing budgets from year to year. The following items comprise the major expenditure changes for 2005: WAGE AND EMPLOYEE BENEFIT INCREASE • 2005 represents year two of a two-year agreement with our various bargaining units. A three percent wage increase was negotiated for 2005 as part of these agreements. • Page 2 • A $32 per month increase is provided for that portion of each employee's health insurance benefit package funded by the City. Based upon the rate increases quoted by our insurance provider, the $32 per month adjustment will cover all of the premium increase for employees choosing single coverage and about 36% of the increase for employees choosing family coverage. EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT As noted above, we recommend that the cost for equipment replacement be returned to the General Fund rather than being financed with equipment certificates. This change results in an increase to the General Fund budget of approximately $500,000, which corresponds to a decrease of a similar amount in the debt service fund for the equipment certificates. The net result to the taxpayer is the same, but the City will save the costs of borrowing associated with the equipment certificates. GENERAL GOVERNMENT. "General Govemment° includes the budgets of the Mayor and Council, Administration, Planning, Finance, Elections, Assessing and Legal and Court Services. An expenditure increase of 2.01 % is budgeted for 2005. PUBLIC WORKS. "Public Works" includes the budgets of the Engineering Department and Public Works maintenance activities including street maintenance, street lighting, traffic control, bridges, retaining walls, sidewalks and parking lots/ramps. An expenditure increase of 11.78% is budgeted for 2005. The majority of this increase is due to transferring equipment replacement costs to the General Fund instead of financing such purchases with equipment certificates. In addition, the budget includes added costs for part-time help, principally for traffic safety coordination. PUBLIC SAFETY. "Public Safety' includes the budgets of the Police Department, Fire Department, Health Department and Inspections Department. An expenditure increase of 5.25 % is budgeted for 2005 including equipment replacement costs. The Council should note the following items: Police Department and Fire Department $28,000 has been added to the Police budget for costs associated with the 800 MHz radio system. • Police and Fire expenditures associated with the new Public Safety Training Center has been reduced by $28,000 due to better than expected rental revenues. Health Department • The Health Department's full time staff complement was reduced by one position for the last five months of 2004 due to a retirement. The budget includes the reinstatement of that position for 2005. PARK & RECREATION. "Park and Recreation" includes park administration, recreation programs and park maintenance activities. An expenditure increase of 6.43% is budgeted for 2005 including equipment replacement costs. NON - DEPARTMENTAL. "Non - Departmental" includes contingencies, special assessments on City properties, CIP appropriation, employee programs, commissions and special projects. An expenditure increase of 6.83% is budgeted for 2005. The Council should note the following items: Fireworks. The City has again received a sponsorship for the July 4, 2005, fireworks display. • Page 3 Human Relations Commission. Representatives of the HRC will attend the budget hearing to provide their recommendations for 2005. Public Artscape. The 2005 Budget includes $25,000 to initiate a public art program in the City. CENTRAL SERVICES. "Central Services" includes the cost of operating City Hall, the Public Works Building, equipment operations, and other general expenses such as insurance. An expenditure increase of 2.89% is budgeted for 2005. The Council should note the following items: Insurance. A $70,000 increase in the cost of workers compensation, property and liability insurance coverage has been included. REVENUES Property Taxes A total property tax increase for 2005 of 4.96% is proposed which includes the General Fund levy and our debt service levies. The General Fund tax levy will increase 7.95% (exclusive of our debt service levies). Once again, our recommendation that equipment certificates not be issued in 2005 has the effect of increasing the General Fund levy while decreasing the debt service levies. If the City were to issue equipment certificates in 2005, our General Fund levy increase would be 4.31 % with a corresponding increase in our debt service levy. Again, the effect on the taxpayer is negligible. As noted above, we recommend that the City should not assume that it will receive a MVHC in 2005. Therefore, the General Fund levy includes this amount. Were the City to assume that it would receive the MVHC from the State, the General Fund levy increase would be 4.74 %. The Council should note the following changes to our non -tax revenues: Ambulance Revenues. A $30,000 increase in ambulance revenues is forecast. False Alarms. A $37,000 decrease in alarm revenues is forecast due to more stringent alarm billing practices, which have reduced the number of false alarms. Senior Center Revenues. Senior Center revenues have increased $38,000 to reflect actual receipts. 50"' and France Assessment. Based on the Council's direction from last year, the maintenance assessment to 50"' and France properties is increasing by $30,000 to defray City costs principally associated with parking ramp maintenance. Financial Crimes Funding. The budget projects a decrease in funding from the State and Federal governments for our Financial Crimes Task Force. Rental of Property. A $30,000 increase in rental fees for City property is forecast. • Page 4 i Intgov't Aid 3.5% Misc. Revenue 4.7% Court Fines 3.7% Fees & Charges 8.6% Licenses & Permits 8.4% BUDGET ADOPTION SCHEDULE August 17, 2004 5:00 P.M. September 7, 2004 7:00 P.M. December 2004* 5:00 P.M. December 2004* 7:00 P.M. * Exact dates to be set • Page 5 Budget Hearing Taxes 71.5% Adopt preliminary levy Truth in Taxation Hearings Budget Adoption 3 CITY OF EDINA 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MN 55424 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Maetzold & Council Members FROM: Susan Heiberg RE: PROPOSED 2005 HUMAN SERVICES BUDGET DATE: August 9, 2004 Attached is the history of the City's funding of human services over the past ten years, a summary of the providers' proposals for 2005, the RFP and the proposal form. To summarize the Commission's work at its July 27th meeting, the following is the proposed human services budget for 2005, which reflects a 4.9% increase over 2004 with the recommended funding of one new program: TOTAL PROPOSED 83,990.00 (4.9% increase) EDINA RESOURCE CENTER PROPOSAL 33,372.00 (37o increase) RPC PROPOSAL 22,736.00 (37o increase) PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1. Senior Community Services 26,250.00 2. Cornerstone 15,100.00 3. VEAP 16,000.00 4. Women in Transition 5,200.00 5. Minneapolis Mediation Program 5,000.00 6. Ministry for Healing and Wholeness 5,180.00 7. The Bridge 4,000.00 8. Ready for Success 2,850.00 9. Store to Door 2,660.00 82,240.00 LINE ITEMS 1. Continuing Education 250.00 2. Dues and Subscriptions 200.00 3. Chemical Health 500.00 4. Education Program - 800.00 1,750.00 TOTAL PROPOSED 83,990.00 (4.9% increase) EDINA RESOURCE CENTER PROPOSAL 33,372.00 (37o increase) RPC PROPOSAL 22,736.00 (37o increase) HUMAN SERVICES FUNDING HISTORY RFP's Proposed Name 2005 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 Senior Community Services 28,200 26,250 26,250 25,500 20,000 15,600 15,000 13,800 12,800 12,650 10,200 9,400 Cornerstone 15,100 15,100 15,100 15,100 15,100 15,1001 15,000 '15,000 15,000 4,950 4,700 4,450 VEAP 20,000 16,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 12,350 8,200 7,400 6,400 6,150 5,400 4,750 Women in Transition 5,375 5,200 5,200 5,035 5,000 2,800 2,100 1,900 1,500 850 1,800 1,700 The Bride 5,000 4,000 4,000 2,500 2,500 1,950 1,350 1,900 1,850 Minneapolis Mediation Program 5,000 5,000 5,000 3,595 Ministry for Healing & Wholeness 10,000 5,180 4,775 Ready for Success 6,000 2,850 3,000 Store To Door 12,208 2,660 Community of Nations 3,000 5,000 Senior Neighborhood Assess. 5,000 5,000 Family & Children's Service 3,595 2,200 700 500 900 The Storefront Group 18,575 33,500 35,300 35,000 34,850 37,150 36,000 35,150 West Suburban Mediation 1,400 1,000 900 800 750 2,100 2,150 Share -A -Home 1,850 1,700 1,800 1,000 1,700 2,100 Side by Side 1,100 900 800 Senior Linkage Line 950 550 476 TOTALS 106,883 82,240 78,325 78,325 86,175 84,900 81,600 79,000 76,700 64,450 62,450 60,176 RPC 22,736 22,7361 22,074 22,074 21,536 21,218 21,218 20,6001 19,629 18,965 17,865 17,345 Edina Resource Center 33,372 33,3721 32,4001 32,400 31,6101 31,1431 30,236 29,3551 28,500 20,000 PROPOSED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR 2005 Senior Community Services Senior Community Services identifies, develops, coordinates and provides services that help meet the needs of people 55 and older. The Senior Outreach Program assists vulnerable adults to remain independent in the community and assists them and their families in securing and monitoring needed services, including counseling for issues such as financial concerns, housing changes, medical insurance, grief and depression. In 2003, 388 Edina residents —frail elders and their family members with the help of 381 volunteers -- received Senior Outreach services -79 of these as intensive, ongoing clients. Cornerstone Cornerstone provides advocacy for victims of domestic abuse. Victims and their children are helped to overcome the barriers they encounter in their struggle to live violence -free lives. Through short-term safe housing, Cornerstone provides shelters and meals for two to three days for persons in imminent danger of domestic assault. Their 24 -hour Help Line provides immediate access to emergency services. The program's goals continue to be providing comprehensive services to victims of domestic violence, increasing the resiliency of youth, educating about the issue of domestic violence, providing volunteer service opportunities, increasing the safety of victims, providing affordable housing with a continuum of supportive services, and assisting participants in obtaining permanent housing. In 2003, Cornerstone served 112 Edina residents with 1,331 hours of direct service. Cornerstone's Intervention Program works within the Criminal Court arena to make sure that people who assault their partners are held accountable by entering a guilty plea to the domestic assault. The Program supports the victim throughout the entire process to help her /him with safety issues, "hear" what type of treatment program would work best in each specific case, and work towards a satisfactory disposition to each case. When the abuser is involved in a treatment program or serving a sentence in the workhouse, the victim is encouraged to come into Cornerstone and attend a support group and access services for the children in the home. Cornerstone's Criminal Justice System utilizes a 24 -hour crisis line and is available 24 hours a day, 365 days a year for Police referrals and victim support services. In 2003, the Intervention Program served 78 Edina residents with 407 hours of direct service. VEAP VEAP helps individuals who cannot financially, physically or emotionally provide for their own well -being in the following ways: back -to- school supplies, emergency financial assistance, food shelves, vouchers, furniture, holiday meals and transportation. VEAP serves residents who are low- income, disabled or elderly, with a focus on the ongoing effects of poverty, the problems of hunger and isolation. A typical Edinan served is an elderly widowed woman in need of transportation. There is rare turnover of VEAP volunteers, with more than 1000 participating in the programs. In 2003, 3,091 units of service were provided to approximately 250 unduplicated Edina households. Women in Transition The Women in Transition Program provides specialized career development and employment services to low- income women in crisis, enabling them to secure stable employment to support themselves and their families. Their services are provided on a sliding fee based on the participant's current income and ability to pay. Through this program, women establish realistic goals based on skills, aptitudes and interests. As a prevention program, it has evolved into a workshop -based career services provider for those struggling to make ends meet without relying on welfare or other public assistance. In 2003, the City of Edina's funding provided workshop services to 11 Edina residents. Minneapolis Mediation Program This program strives to promote the use of mediation, conciliation and training throughout the metropolitan area, with services free of charge or for a nominal administrative fee. Edinans have primarily utilized the mediation services for issues such as business, relationship /family, neighborhood and landlord /tenant —with 60 volunteer mediators trained in these areas. The program is focused on providing dispute resolution services and training to all people but is focused especially on those whom traditional methods don't serve well or for whom the methods would be detrimental or costly. In 2003, the program served 110 Edina residents. Normandale Ministry for Healing and Wholeness The Ministry seeks to establish and /or maintain elders' sense of connection with the community.and alleviate isolation by organizing and supporting community volunteers in Care Teams that support elders and their caregivers. Care Teams —with a network of over 338 volunteers — provide social support, transportation, grocery shopping, errands and other basic services that allow elders to remain in their homes. In 2003, 68 Edina residents were served through the Care Teams, and an additional 312 Edinans were served through caregiver education, resource counseling, foot -care services and wellness clinics. The Bridge The mission of The Bridge is to provide youth with safe shelter, assist in the resolution of family conflicts and reunite families whenever possible. The four types of youth served are: 1) Those from 10 to 17 in family or school conflict. The family is called within 24 hours, and a meeting is arranged, with a goal to improve relationships and provide tools. 2) Those who come from abuse and /or drug use. They might go with another family member or to foster care for a safe environment. 3) Those who are called throw - aways. This number is on the rise, because their families do not want them. An effort is made to get the families in to talk and to determine where there is a safe place to go. 4) Those whose families are homeless. These are tough cases, and other agencies get involved to find housing. The Bridge is open 24/7, and the services are free. It is a part of the StreetWorks Collaboration, and a full -time nurse is utilized with the street outreach workers. As an emergency services program, The Bridge served 19 Edina residents in 2003. Ready for Success Ready for Success offers a service to women entering or re- entering the professional workplace. It provides clothing necessary to make a positive presentation as well as the training, education and encouragement needed for long -term professional success. Each client is paired with a volunteer personal shopper who assists in "shopping" the racks of clothing in order to dress appropriately for interviews and in the workplace. Staff and volunteers offer onsite coaching and encouragement regarding workplace skills and presentation. Clients are not charged and are accepted by referral only from providers such as Cornerstone and Women in Transition. Clients who had been victims of domestic abuse reported how the program empowered them to make their own choices and gave them confidence and determination to find and retain better jobs. Ten Edina residents were served in 2003 at a $300 cost per client. Store to Door Store to Door is a 20 year -old nonprofit grocery shopping and prescription delivery service for frail elders and disabled residents. Anyone who is physically unable to shop qualifies for service, and the average client is 82 years old, female and living alone. Store to Door shops from five different Cub Foods stores across the Twin Cities. All clients pay for groceries and prescriptions, and there is a sliding fee scale used to determine a delivery contribution. With more than 330 volunteers —seven from Edina -45 households were served in 2003 in Edina. RPC RPC is the mechanism designed to address the research, planning and coordination of human services.in Edina, demonstrating a process and structure that is responsive to the community's need for responsibility and accountability. RPC's mission is to ensure that the human service needs of Edinans are identified through research and planning and, where possible, met through the coordination of service providers. The goal is to work cooperatively towards creating an environment in which individuals are empowered to identify their needs and use the resources of the community to their benefit— ultimately aiming towards community action. Edina Resource Center The mission of the Edina Resource Center is to help families, providers and community organizations get connected quickly and successfully to a continuum of social services and community resources. Specifically, the Center provides a critical link to human services for families and individuals in Edina; assists health and human service professionals in accessing services for their clients; helps families and individuals focus on prevention and early intervention in addressing issues before they become crises; and identifies gaps in' services while affecting systemic change. 491N�,I�L o� e • �1COq�'OPA�BQ April 30, 2004 Val Burke Edina Resource Center 5701 Normandale Road Edina, MN 55424 Dear Val: City of Edina The Edina Human Relations Commission is inviting submission of your proposal for the Edina City Council's consideration in the funding of your program for 2005. A form is enclosed as a guideline. Please attach it to the front of your proposal as a cover page, having addressed all of the requested information. The following Mission Statement should direct you in determining that your request is appropriate for the Commission's evaluation: The mission of the Edina Human Relations Commission is to advocate for basic human riebts and needs in our community and to provide responsibility and integrity in our human relationships by offering information and recommendations, cooperating with other communities and governmental organizations, and sponsoring forums and community events. Task forces consisting of Human Relations Commissioners will evaluate your request and may call with questions. Please submit 13 copies of your proposal to me by Monday, May 31St, so that the Commission may begin its task. You will have an opportunity to interact with the Commissioners at a hearing in July. If you have any questions, please call me at 952- 826 -0403. Sincerely, Susan Heiberg Human Services Coordinator sh City Hall 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 City of Edina Human Relations Commission REQUEST FOR HUMAN SERVICES FUNDING Agency Amount Requested Address /City/ZIP, Contact Person & Title Contact's Phone Contact's E -mail Agency Website Please answer all questions completely or your application will be returned to you for completion before it is considered. I. Edina information As an Edina Commission, our primary interest in recommending human services funding is to help meet the unmet needs of Edina residents. Please answer the following questions briefly on one page as an executive summary. A. What services did Edina residents use in your past fiscal year? B. How many Edina residents (unduplicated) were served in your past fiscal year (include any pertinent demographics)? What percentage of your unduplicated total did Edina residents represent? C. How many Edina residents (unduplicated) do you project you will serve in your current fiscal year? Please calculate the "per client" funding (amount of funding requested of Edina divided by number of Edina clients). D. How do you determine the extent of unmet needs in Edina, how do you assess those needs and how do you propose to meet them? E. Your analysis of Edina client costs not reimbursed to you by the client or the client's insurance (include percentage of Edina clients for whom you receive some reimbursement; percentage of Edina clients who can pay for services; average percentage reimbursement for all clients; etc.) F. What is your agency's connection with the Edina Resource Center (formerly Edina FamiLink)? II. Required additional information: A. Complete list of current Board of Directors (names, phone numbers, addresses); B. Mission and /or vision of your organization and how it is evaluated; C. How you're organized to achieve your mission; D. Your organization's goals for the current fiscal year; E. Descriptions of key staff credentials; F. Financial information: 1. Financial statement, including revenue and expenses and /or balance sheet for most recent fiscal year (audit if available); 2. Projected actual revenues and expenses for current year, compared to budget, including any significant variations; 3. Each source of income by category (by municipality, by county, foundation /grant, United Way, donations from faith communities and private donations); 4. Staffing: number of FTEs and costs; also information on volunteer staff. MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY HELD AT CITY HALL AUGUST 3, 2004 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Housh, Hovland, Masica and Chair Maetzold. CONSENT AGENDA APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Hovland and seconded by Commissioner Housh approving the Consent Agenda for the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Masica, Maetzold Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FOR JULY 20, 2004, APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Hovland and seconded by Commissioner Housh approving the Minutes of the regular meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority for July 20, 2004, as presented. Motion carried on rollcall vote — four ayes. There being no further business on the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Agenda, Chair Maetzold declared the meeting adjourned. Executive Director o e Cn p \NCORPOP,- less A PROCLAMATION. WHEREAS, Sister Kenny Rehabilitation Institute Golf Program for Individuals with Physical Disabilities will celebrate its 25th Anniversary on Monday, August 30, 2004; and WHEREAS, as one of the nation's first, Sister Kenny's Golf Program has made valuable contributions to the community through pioneering principles of providing opportunities for individuals with disabilities to fully participate meaningfully in the game of golf or renewing interest after the onset of a disabling condition; and WHEREAS, throughout the program's history, Braemar Golf Course, Edina, Minnesota, has hosted the Sister Kenny Golf Program and provided ongoing support to enable the Sister Kenny Golf Program to excel; and WHEREAS, today, the nationally - recognized Sister Kenny Golf Program is at the forefront of instructional techniques providing outreach and educational clinics as well as a competitive golf tournament; and WHEREAS, the Golf Program serves more than 175 people annually — people who have experienced a limitation in physical, visual or hearing function as a result of an injury or illness. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Edina by action of its City Council does hereby proclaim Monday, August 30, 2004, to be: SISTER KENNY INSTITUTE GOLF PROGRAM FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH PHYSICAL DISABILITIES DAY Dated this 17th day of August, 2004, in the City of Edina, Minnesota. MAYOR 0w e, 0 Nov �y \NCORPORP''t�9� �eee PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, this year marks 75 years in show business for Mickey Mouse, one of the world's most popular personalities; and WHEREAS, since his debut in the first synchronized sound cartoon, "Steamboat Willie," more than seven decades ago, Mickey has become an international personality whose success laid the foundation upon which Walt Disney built his creative organization; and WHEREAS, today Mickey Mouse is the official greeter of all the Disney theme parks, welcoming kings and presidents, prime ministers and princes, actors, and millions of fans; and WHEREAS, the Walt Disney Company is honoring Mickey Mouse's 75th Anniversary with an 18- month celebration that began in November 2003 at Walt Disney World Resort with the unveiling of 75 uniquely. designed, 700 - pound, six- foot -tall Mickey statues; and WHEREAS, during the "Celebrate Mickey: 75 InspEARations" tour, the statues are scheduled to visit 10 cities across the United States, including Edina, before being auctioned off for charity in 2005; and WHEREAS, 14 statues, including one designed by Minnesota Timberwolves star and NBA MVP Kevin Garnett, will be on display at Galleria August 21 through October 21; NOW, THEREFORE I, Dennis F. Maetzold, Mayor of the City of Edina, do hereby proclaim Saturday, August 21, 2004, as "MICKEYMOUSE DAY" in the City of Edina and I encourage all area residents to celebrate the one -of-a -kind mouse with a one -of-a-kind, memorable exhibit at Galleria. Dennis Maetzold, Mayor MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING. OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL AUGUST 3, 2004 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Housh, Hovland, Masica and Mayor Maetzold. Member Kelly entered the meeting at 7:06 P.M. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Hovland and seconded by Member Housh approving the Council Consent Agenda as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Masica, Maetzold Motion carried. RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION - VINCE BONGAARTS Mayor Maetzold commended and thanked Vince Bongaarts, for serving the City for three decades, both as a Police Officer and following his retirement from Police work, as Traffic Safety Coordinator. Member Masica made a motion approving the Resolution of Appreciation for Vince Bongaarts and commended his dedication, commitment and his model of customer service to the City of Edina. Member Hovland seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Masica, Maetzold Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF JULY 20, 2004, APPROVED Motion made by Member Hovland and seconded by Member Housh, approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Edina City Council for July 20, 2004. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *RESOLUTION NO. 2004 -71 APPROVING LOT DIVISION. - 7000 TUPA DRIVE AND 6909 ST. PATRICK'S. LANE Motion made by Member Hovland and seconded by Member Housh introducing the following resolution and moving its adoption: RESOLUTION. NO. 2004-71 APPROVING LOT DIVISION FOR 7000 TUPA DRIVE AND 6909 ST. PATRICK'S LANE WHEREAS, the following described properties are at present two tracts of land: and Lot 7, Block 1, Braemar Hills Fifth Addition All of Outlot 1 Elm View let Addition WHEREAS, the owners have requested the following land transfer as follows: PARCEL A: Lot 7, Block 1, Braemar Hills Fifth Addition and the East 87.19 feet of that part of Outlot 1. PARCEL B: Page 1 Minutes/Edina City Council/August 3, 2004 Outlot 1, Elm View 1st Addition except for that part of Outlot 1, lying South of the North 50.0 feet thereof, and lying North of the south 210.0 feet thereof together with Lot 7, Block 1, Braemar Hills Fifth Addition WHEREAS, the requested land transfer is authorized under Code Section 810 and it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said newly created Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the Edina City Code Sections 810 and 850. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of the above described tracts of land (PARCEL A and PARCEL B) as separate tracts of land are hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Code Sections 850 and 810 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but only to the extent permitted under Code Sections 810 and 850 subject to the limitations set out in Code Section 850 and said Ordinances are now waived for any other purpose or as to any other provisions thereof, and further subject, however, to the. provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent Ordinances of the City of Edina. Adopted this 3rd day of August, 2004. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *HEARING DATE SET OF AUGUST 17, 2004, FOR PLANNING MATTERS Motion made by Member Hovland and seconded by Member Housh setting August 17, 2004, for the following planning matters: 1. Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Plat - 5125 49th Street West (Mark Jones/Thea Lucy Marshall); and 2. Public Hearing - Amendment to Zoning Ordinance - Floodplain Regulations Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. ORDINANCE NO 2004 -10 APPROVED - ESTABLISHING A MUNICIPAL DISPENSARY PERMITTING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF MUNICIPAL DISPENSARIES Manager Hughes noted the City Council granted First Reading of the subject Ordinance at the July 20, 2004, meeting. He added staff recommended granting Second Reading. Member Hovland introduced the following Ordinance:. ORDINANCE NO. 2004-10 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SUBSECTIONS 900.02 and 900.03 OF THE CITY CODE - MUNICIPAL LIQUOR DISPENSARY The City Council of the City of Edina ordains: Section 1. Subsection 900.02 of the City Code is amended to read as follows: "900.02 Off -Sale Limited to Municipal Liquor Stores; Dispensary Established. No intoxicating liquor, intoxicating malt liquor or wine shall be sold, or caused to be sold at off -sale within the City by any person, or by any store or establishment, or by any agent or employee of such person, store or establishment, except by the City and on the premises in the City occupied by the municipal liquor dispensary for the off -sale of liquor and wine. There is hereby established a municipal liquor dispensary for the off -sale and on -sale of liquor and wine. The dispensary shall be located at such suitable places in the City as the Council determines by resolution. Subd.1 Off -Sale Dispensary. The following shall apply to the municipal liquor dispensary for the off -sale of liquor and wine: Page 2 Minutes/Edina City Council/August 3, 2004 A. The dispensary shall be under the control of the Manager. The Manager may appoint employees as deemed necessary to operate the dispensary in full compliance with this Section and State Law. No person under the State established legal drinking age shall be employed in the dispensary. B. The Manager may require persons employed in the dispensary to furnish a surety bond to the City in the same manner as prescribed by Subsection 115.12 of this Code. C. Subject to the requirements of M.S. 340A.504, the hours of operation and the dispensary shall be established by resolution of the Council. D. All restrictions as to the manner of conducting sales as set forth in Subsection 900.10 except Subd. 7 thereof shall apply to the dispensary. Subd. 2. On -Sale Dispensary. All restrictions as to the manner of conducting sales as set forth in subsections 900.10, 900.11 and 900.12 shall apply to the municipal liquor dispensary for the on -sale of liquor and wine." Section 2. Subsection 900.03 of the City Code is amended to read as follows: "900.03 License Required. No. person, except wholesalers or manufacturers to the extent authorized by law, directly or indirectly, upon any pretense or by any device, shall sell at off -sale any 3.2 percent malt liquor or at on -sale any 3.2 percent malt liquor, intoxicating malt liquor, wine or intoxicating liquor without first having obtained a license, other than sales by the City at its municipal liquor dispensary." Section 3. Subd. 4 of Subsection 900.09 of the City Code shall be amended to read as follows: "Subd. 4 Wine Licenses. In addition to the requirements of Subd.1 of this Subsection, no Wine License shall be granted to any establishment other than a restaurant located in the PCD -1, PCD -2, PCD -3 Subdistricts, the Mixed Development District or the Planned Office District. Section 4. Paragraph 0.3 of Subsection 1230.02 of the City Code shall be amended to read as follows: "3. 3.2 percent malt liquor, wine and intoxicating malt liquor which is dispensed by the City or by an agent of the City at an on -sale dispensary authorized pursuant to Subsection 900.02 may be consumed subject to other applicable provisions of this Code and subject to the rules and regulations of the Park Director pursuant to Subsection 1230.06 on the grounds of Braemar Golf Course. 3.2 percent malt liquor which is dispensed by the City or by an agent of the Cityy at an on- sale dispensary authorized pursuant to Subsection 900.02 may be consumed subject to other applicable provisions of this Code and subject to the rules. and regulations of the Park Director pursuant to Subsection 1230.06 on the grounds of Fred Richards Golf Course. Section 5. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon passage and publication. First Reading: July 20, 2004 Second Reading: August 3, 2004 Publication: August 12, 2004 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Rollcall: Ayes: Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold Nays: Housh Motion carried. Dennis F. Maetzold, Mayor. 44t AND FRANCE BACKGROUND REPORT PRESENTED Mr. Hughes indicated on July 6, 2004, at the Council meeting, staff was directed to prepare a background report concerning 44th and France for its review at the August 3, 2004, meeting. He said copies of the report were made available to residents desiring a copy as well as the report has been posted on the City's web site. Page 3 Minutes/Edina City Council/August 3, 2004 Mr. Hughes stated that in 1990, the Council established three tax increment financing districts (TIF districts) and a related development district: 1) 44th and France, Wooddale and Valley View and 70th /Cahill. TIF districts had previously been established at 50th and France and Grandview as well as Edinborough and Centennial Lakes. Although the TIF Districts have gone away, the development district remains in effect. Within the development district, the City remains the authority to carry out plans and programs. Approximately $280,000 remains in the 70th and Cahill district that could be used at 44th and France or Wooddale /Valley View. Mr. Hughes noted that all retail areas in Edina were in a development district. In 1992, the Council adopted the Comprehensive Plan, which included the 44th and France area as well as other retail districts. Staff's logic was that plans prepared as part of the development district could provide valuable guidance to the City when reviewing future private development proposals for properties within the commercial areas. The decision was made even though two of the TIF districts had been decertified and the City lacked fiscal tools necessary to implement the plan as originally authorized. Mr. Hughes noted that the Comprehensive Plan was updated in 2002 and again the development/ redevelopment plans for the retail districts were adopted by reference and remain part of the Comprehensive Plan today. Mr. Hughes noted that if implementing the plans were ever contemplated, plans would need to be approved by the Council via rezonings, eminent domain, or other actions of the Council. He added all these processes require public hearings before the Council and the Planning Commission before implementation. Mr. Hughes suggested the following four alternatives for consideration: 1. Eliminate 44th and France from the Development District. By Council Resolution, 44th and France could be eliminated from the Development District. Consequences of removing this would mean that the City would relinquish authority to implement the Development District plan/program and of eminent domain for redevelopment purposes, providing interest assistance, demolishing buildings, and taking other steps envisioned by the redevelopment plan at the time. The City would still retain normal condemnation authority that must demonstrate public use but not for public purpose. 2. Amend the Development District by Removing Single Family Properties. The Council could elect to remove the single - family properties from the Development District, thereby taking away the ability to use condemnation to acquire homes. 3. Amend the Comprehensive Plan by Deleting Reference to the 44th and France Redevelopment Plan. In addition to #1 and #2, the Council could amend the Comprehensive Plan by deleting references to the 44th and France area. Amending the Comprehensive Plan was a detailed process; the Metropolitan Council was involved, a hearing would be held by the Planning Commission, the Edina School District and the City of Minneapolis would review the plan. What was looked for in the plan was conformity with regional systems - sewers, highways, airports, etc. 4. No Amendment to Development District or Comprehensive Plan. The Council could choose to leave the Development District and the Comprehensive Plan in place. Mayor Maetzold again reiterated the plan had been in place since 1990, and noted that no developer was standing ready to bulldoze the area for redevelopment. Member Kelly asked what benefits were gained by leaving the Development District in place. Mr. Hughes noted within the plan, acquisition of property, resale of property, interest assistance, and off - street parking would be lost with removal of 44th and France from the Development District. Improvements on the right -of -way could still be accomplished. Member Kelly said tangible benefits would be lost with removal of the 44th and France area from the Development District. He asked if the City would lose controls with eliminating the area. Mr. Hughes said controls over undesirable plans would come from the Comprehensive Plan itself as well as the Zoning Ordinance. Page 4 Minutes/Edina Cif Council/Auggst 3, 2004 Member Masica asked clarification that if the plan were deleted, would only zoning and variances remain for the Council's checks and balances. Mr. Hughes said the Comprehensive Plan would provide the regulatory tools. Member Masica inquired what happens to the $280,000 in the pool if the area was deleted. Mr. Hughes said the money would be available to the two remaining portions of the TIF District. Member Housh asked for background on establishing the TIF Districts in 1989. Mr. Hughes noted that the City has used TIF dollars for doing public improvements to public things. Member Housh inquired if the public would be properly noticed if any changes were planned in the area. Acting City Attorney Lindgren indicated that any condemnation or eminent domain proceedings would require a petition filed with the court. The process would be assigned to a court, and the court appoints neutral parties to evaluate the property in a totally open setting. Once the valuation has been determined, an appeal process would be available back to the court and would take months to process. Member Hovland asked if the area would be void of a land use plan with elimination of the development district. Mr. Hughes said what was lost were the fiscal tools and the development tools but the land use plan was retained. Member Hovland questioned whether the plan should be revisited and perhaps land use plan modified. Mr. Hughes noted typically if a plan were revisited it would be for the purpose of moving forward with a plan. Member Kelly said giving up fiscal and development tools was a mistake when the Council has to decide whether to encourage or discourage development. He said he would agree to the elimination of single - family properties from the plan and would approve Alternative No. 2. Member Hovland called the neighborhood eclectic and stated it would be difficult to separate residential from commercial property owners. He said he would like to see the neighborhood involved in a process to modify the development district and maintain its character. He stated that not all redevelopment was bad. Mayor Maetzold said his intuition tells him that the 44th and France plan needs revisiting. He voiced concern with removing the commercial property from the Development District. Joni Bennett, 4003 Lynn Avenue, stated this was all about eminent domain. She requested the Council approve Alternative No. 1 - Eliminate 44th and France from the Development District. She inquired whether a Development District could be recreated. Mr. Hughes said the District could be eliminated, receive a proposal, go through a hearing process and re- establish a District. She requested the Comprehensive Plan be revisited. The only remaining reason to maintain the 44th and France District was to preserve the power of the City to use eminent domain. Mary Carte, 4208 Branson Street, stated that surveys provided to residents of the Morningside neighborhood were overwhelmingly in favor of the 44th and France Development Plan being eliminated. Philip Sidell, 3920 Sunnyside Road, encouraged the Council to approve Alternative No. 1 - to Eliminate 44th and France from the Development District. Norine Ford, 3936 44th Street, said the question was not commercial property vs. residential property; the question was maintaining the area as it was today. Jennifer Janovy, 4016 Inglewood Av., stated the features of the current plan were different from the current land use. The plan that was envisioned would be the same as it was now. Page 5 Minutes/Edina City Council/August 3, 2004 Lee McGrath, 4614 Moorland Avenue, requested the City explore relinquishing power to use eminent domain for private -to- private transfers. Unknown resident voiced support to Alternative No. 1, and encouraged the Council to revisit the Comprehensive Plan. Member Hovland stated his approval of Alternative No. 1 to Eliminate 44th and France from the Development District. The economic incentives were nominal and the City will still possess the powers to assure the protection of the ambiance of the area. Member Housh indicated his support of Alternative No. 1 and appreciated the citizens involvement in this process. Member Kelly noted that people may be motivated to development discussions in the broad sense but at the point a developer comes forward with an unpopular/ popular plan and the tools of control have been given up, that was when the Council will be 'hoisted on a petard'. Development will come - change happens. He stated his belief that the Comprehensive Plan should be revisited but approving the elimination of the 44th and France Development District was a huge mistake. Member Masica made a motion eliminating the 44th and France from the Development District. Member Housh seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 2004 -72 APPROVING MUNICIPAL STATE AID SIDEWALK FOR 4809 TO 4709 WEST 70TH STREET (IMPROVEMENT NO. S-074) Engineer Houle explained the project was continued from the July 20, 2004, regular Council meeting. Additional information was requested regarding the location of the sidewalk and the location of the mailboxes between 4809 to 4709 West 70th Street. Staff recommends a boulevard style sidewalk, placed throughout the project with the exception of the furthest westerly property due to lack of right-of-way. A boulevard style sidewalk does exist along both the north and south sides of West 70th Street from TH100 to Sandell Avenue (one block west of France Avenue). A curb style sidewalk exists between Sandell Avenue and France Avenue due to lack of right -of -way and space within the commercial area. Staff contacted the US Postal Service regarding placement of curbside mailboxes. The US Postal regulations state that a mailbox be placed to allow safe and convenient delivery by carriers without leaving their vehicles. Mr. Lynch of the US Postal Service replied that, if "a carrier drives on the sidewalk (it) would not be considered safe and convenient." The project cost was approximately $113,00 and would be funded from Minnesota State Aid Funding for the sidewalk portion of the project. The Arneson Acres entrance would be funded through the City. Mr. Houle indicated staff recommends construction of a boulevard style sidewalk at 4809 to 4709 West 70th Street, Improvement No. S -074, and feels the project was feasible from an engineering and safety standpoint. Don Barck, 4807 West 70th Street, asked if a boulevard type sidewalk was planned for the Arneson Park area. Mr. Houle responded the whole sidewalk project would be of a boulevard type. Mr. Barck voiced concern that during the winter, the sidewalk was too narrow for the five -foot "v' plow to remove snow. He was concerned as well with elevation of the sidewalk. Mr. Houle reiterated that drainage patterns would not be disturbed but consideration would be given to the elevation. Page 6 Minutes/Edina City Council/August 3, 2004 Following a Council discussion, Member. Masica introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2004-72 ORDERING MUNICIPAL STATE AID SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. S -074 4809 TO 4709 WEST 70TH STREET WHEREAS, the Edina City Council on the 3rd day of August, received the feasibility report for a proposed sidewalk, Improvement No. S-074,4809 to 4709 West 70th Street. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Council has duly considered the views of all persons interested, and being fully advised of the pertinent facts, does hereby determine to proceed with the construction of said improvements, including all proceedings which may be necessary in eminent domain for the acquisition of necessary easements and rights hereby designated and shall be referred to in all subsequent proceedings as Improvement No. S -074, 4809 to 4709 West 70th Street. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Improvement No. S-074,4809 to 4709 West 70th Street are hereby ordered as proposed. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Engineer is hereby designated as the engineer for said aforementioned improvement. Dated this 3*d day of August, 2004. Member Hovland seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 2004 -70 - ESTABLISHING TEMPORARY DISPENSARY FOR WINE AND BEER DURING THE "FALL INTO. THE ARTS FESTIVAL" APPROVED Mr. Hughes noted that the "Fall Into the Arts Festival" was scheduled for Saturday, September 11 and Sunday, September 12, 2004, at Centennial Lakes Park. The Festival was a joint venture between the Edina Art Center and the Edina Crime Fund. It has been suggested by the planners of the event to sell wine and beer, similar to the way it was sold at the 50th & France Art Fair. Sales would occur on the outdoor patio and be sold by employees of the Art Center. An off -duty police officer would be hired and all other restrictions as imposed on the 50t & France Art Fair would be observed including signage restrictions and hours of operation. Mr. Hughes said the appropriate way to accomplish this would be to establish a temporary dispensary as opposed to issuing a temporary intoxicating liquor license. This would be in keeping with recent interpretations by the State Liquor Control Board. Member Hovland introduced the following resolution and moved its approval: RESOLUTION 2004 -70 ESTABLISHING MUNICIPAL DISPENSARIES IN THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, the City of Edina, pursuant to Section 900 of the City Code, permits the establishment of municipal dispensaries of liquor within the City of Edina. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Edina hereby establishes a temporary on -sale dispensary for September 11 and September 12, 2004, only at the Centennial Lakes Park Centrum building and immediate surroundings. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that on -sale shall be limited to 3.2 beer, intoxicating malt liquor and wine. Passed and adopted this 3rd day of August 2004. Member Housh seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold Motion carried. Page 7 Minutes/Edina City Council/August 3, 2004 RESOLUTION NO. 2004 -69 APPROVING THE CREATION OF THE MINNEHAHA WATERSHED PARTNERSHIP WITH VARIOUS. PUBLIC AGENCY PARTNERS Michael Wyatt, staff member with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) explained the District was undertaking revisions to their 1997 Watershed Management Plan; an updated plan was required every 10 years for watershed districts. As a part of the revisioning process, the MCWD was inviting all district stakeholders to participate. The process involves a three -year commitment to the Policy Board, Technical Advisory Committee, and a Public Advisory Committee. The member profile and time commitment for each committee as it applies to the City was as follows: Policy Board Technical Advisory Committee Public Advisory Committee One Council Member City Staff Two Citizen Representatives Quarterly Meetings Monthly as needed Monthly as needed Carolyne Bisson, asked if the Watershed District voted on this issue and if Mr. Wyatt was asked to present the Resolution to the Council. Mr. Wyatt explained the Resolution was fully supported by the MCWD with the hope to partner with cities along the creek. Member Hovland introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2004-69 A RESOLUTION CREATING A MINNEHAHA CREEK PARTNERSHIP WHEREAS, Minnehaha Creek is a highly valued stream flowing from Lake Minnetonka to the Mississippi River; and WHEREAS, the preservation and enhancement of the Minnehaha Creek Corridor is a high - priority expressed in the comprehensive plans for each of the cities along the Creek, and the Water Resources Management Plan of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, and WHEREAS, urbanization in the Minnehaha Creek Watershed has led to the degradation of the stream's flow regime, habitat and water quality, but the Creek has high potential for restoration; and WHEREAS, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District completed in 2003 a detailed Hydrologic/Hydraulic and Pollutant Loading Study, and a Minnehaha Creek Stream Assessment, and WHEREAS, the MCWD will undertake revisions to its Watershed Management Plan in partnership with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Feasibility Study to explore the potential federal interest for Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration and Flood Damage Reduction in the Minnehaha Creek Corridor; WHEREAS, the City of Edina desires to partner with the other communities along the Creek to seek protection and restoration of the Minnehaha Creek Corridor, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Edina supports the formation of a partnership to provide guidance and recommendations on policy development, technical issues, and public involvement to create a common vision and implementation plan for the Minnehaha Creek Corridor, to be organized as follows: 1. Partnership Composition The partnership will comprise the following partners: • City of Minnetonka; • City of Hopkins; • City of St. Louis Park; • City of Edina, • City of Minneapolis; • Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board; • Hennepin County; and Page 8 Minutes/Edina City Council/Auggst 3, 2004 • Minnehaha Creek Watershed District 2. Policy Board a. The partnership Policy Board will comprise a member of the governing body of each of the partner organizations. b. The Policy Board will generally meet quarterly as needed and pursuant to an established project schedule and work plan. 3. Technical Advisory Committee a. The Technical Advisory Committee will provide technical review and recommendations to the partnership and will comprise a staff representative from each of the partner organizations, and a representative from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Minnesota Department of Health and such other governmental agencies having a technical interest and expertise to offer for the benefit of the Minnehaha Creek Corridor. b. The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District technical representative will serve as the Chair of the Technical Advisory Committee. c. The Technical Advisory Committee will generally meet monthly as needed pursuant to the established project work schedule and work plan. 4. Public Advisory Committee a. The Public Advisory Committee will comprise two citizen representatives designated by each partner organization, and up. to seven other representatives of stakeholder organizations named by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District to represent conservation, property owner, development, and recreational interests in the Minnehaha Creek Watershed appointed by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed through an open application process. b. The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District will designate one of its Board Members to serve as Chair to the Public Advisory Committee. C. The Public Advisory Committee will generally meet monthly as needed pursuant to the established project schedule and work plan. 5. Legal Authority It is understood that the decisions and activities of the partnership are advisory only, and will not have any binding legal authority on any of the partnership's members. The parties to the partnership. expect that recommendations. developed and approved by the partnership will be duly considered and acted upon by the governing body of the respective the partnership members. 6. Term The partnership will meet and work for an initial period of three (3) years, concluding on or before March 1, 2007, subject to a determination to renew the work of the partnership by each of its partner organizations. Member Kelly seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold Motion carried. *CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Member Hovland made a motion and Member Housh seconded the motion approving payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated July 21, 2004, and consisting of 33 pages: General Fund $213,502.35; Communications Fund $45,434.55, Working Capital Fund $76,011.19, Art Center Fund $11,878.90, Aquatic Center Fund $5,802.94; Golf Course Fund $40,586.46; Ice Arena Fund $361.89; Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fund $15,916.93; Liquor Fund $121,762.02; Utility Fund $438,603.21, Storm Sewer Fund $14,375.50; PSTF Fund $198.37, TOTAL $984,434.31; and for approval of payment of claims dated July 28, 2004, and consisting of 33 pages: General Fund $193,181.05, Construction Fund $87.38, Working Capital Fund $2,739.05; Art Center Fund $24,337.37; Golf Dome Fund $95.00; Aquatic Center Fund $10,115.23; Golf Course Fund $24,181.89; Ice Arena Fund Page 9 Minutes/Edina City Council/August 3, 2004 $2,979.84, Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fund $9,363.34; Liquor Fund $157,282.96; Utility Fund $110,262.82; Storm Sewer Fund $420.00; PSTF Agency Fund $1,317.85; TOTAL $536,363.78. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. CONCERN OF RESIDENT Carolyne Bisson, 5340 Hollywood Road, stated she was currently not in compliance with the animal ordinance. She said she has four dogs and asked for a temporary license or variance for the fourth dog. Clerk Mangen said Ms. Bisson had approached staff and requested licenses for all of her dogs. Staff suggested she apply for a permit to keep more than three animals. Attorney Lindgren said the Ordinance did not allow a variance for an extra number of animals. He suggested she apply for a kennel license. Mr. Hughes suggested Ms. Bisson complete the process for a permit to keep more than three animals. He stated after the City received her completed application the Council may hold a hearing following a ten day written notice. If Ms. Bission submits her application in time to allow the ten day mailing then her hearing may be held at the next Council meeting on August 17, 2004. No formal Council action was taken. GIFT FROM TIFFANY'S RECEIVED ON BEHALF. OF THE CITY Mayor Maetzold indicated he and Member Masica were involved in the Grand Opening of the new Tiffany's Jewelry Store in the Galleria. A representative of Tiffany's presented them with a gift for the citizens of Edina. Attorney Lindgren deemed the gift (a gold clock), received on behalf of the City becomes public property. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Maetzold declared the meeting adjourned at 9:45 P.M. City Clerk Page 10 I n REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # II.A. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE Consent ❑ City Engineer Information Only F-1 Date: August 17, 2004 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA . ® To Council Subject: Vacation of Existing Alley Action ❑ Motion. Easement adjacent to Lots 2, Resolution 3, 8, & 9 of Block 4 of Mendelssohn. Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Vacate a portion of existing alley easement and retain all existing utility easements located adjacent to Lots 2, 3, 8, & 9 of Block 4 of Mendelssohn. Info /Background: The proposed. vacation of the existing alleyway is requested by the owner of the property located at 308 Blake Road (Lot 9 and part of Lot 8, Block 4 of Mendelssohn). The owner of 308 Blake Road has constructed a shed that encroaches into this alley. The alleyway to the north of this location was vacated in 1958 for reasons unknown or undocumented. The alleyway to the south of the proposed vacation transverses an existing storm water pond, see attached sketch. The City, of Edina Utilities and Centerpoint Energy do not object to this vacation. Xcel Energy, Qwest, and Time Warner Cable approve the vacation with the condition of retaining all utility easements due to their utilities being located on power poles in this location. Staff recommends the vacation be approved on condition of retaining all existing utility easements on the property. x AI' ` ,.a r .r �f AN 14, z PROPOSED VACATION i �+ Y t".9�k•. i ^„�l[ �,' i � l�t�f:9AC- 'E /c.:'.d� '�" a�,,,., ,t,3 m # R °� R PROPOSED ALLEY VACATION Lots 2, 3, 87 & 9, Block 4, Mendelssohn City of Edina, MN Ej ?v _��j S c� f ma . . . . . . . . . . . . ON4 "m 0 Ai"I" �" 7F �t N afk � Ej -6, 1 14 PUBLIC HEARING FOR VACATING ALLEYWAY LOCATED ADJACENT TO: 308 BLAKE ROAD Vacation Area 71 6 -T� 6 at. P Blake Road -Alley Vacation I ➢ 1 History: • Mendelssohn Addition platted in mid- 1950's. • Homeowners shed constructed on a portion of alleyway to avoid larger tree. • Alleyway to north vacated in 1958. • No public access possible due to storm water pond to south. 708 Blake Road — Alley Vacation Utility Information: • Xcel Energy, Qwest, and Time Warner Cable approve - subject to retaining all utility easements. • City of Edina Utilities and Centerpoint Energy do not object to vacation. 708 Blake Road — 2ey Vacation Staff Recommendation: • Vacate alleyway subject to retaining all utility easements. 708 Blake Read — Allay Vacation )�-2 _ °, w. 0 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION TO: Mayor and Council From: Craig Larsen City Planner. Date: August 1,7, 2004 Subject: Technical Correction to Wallingford Addition /Final Plat & Final Rezoning for 5101 70 Street West Agenda Item # III. A. Consent Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ❑ Motion ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance ° ❑ Discussion RECOMMENDATION: Approve corrected legal description for plat and rezoning for the Wallingford development at West 70th Street and Metro Boulevard. INFO /BACKGROUND: The legal description provided for the Final Rezoning hearing was incomplete. The proposed action would correct the Council minutes and resolution of the July 20, 2004, meeting by inserting the correct legal description of the property. RESOLUTION NO. 2004-73 FINAL PLAT — WALLINGFORD ADDITION 5101 WEST 70' STREET City of Edina BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled, "WALLINGFORD ADDITION ", platted by The Wallingford Partnership, L.L.P., a Minnesota limited liability partnership and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council on July 20, 2004, be and is hereby granted final plat approval. Adopted this 20th day of July, 2004. ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of July 20, 2004, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com ,20 . City Clerk 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 ORDINANCE NO. 850-A-25 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 850) BY REZONING PROPERTY TO PLANNED RESIDENCE DISTRICT - 4 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Subsection 850.06 of Section 850 of the Edina City Code is amended by adding the following thereto: The extent of the Planned Residence District 4, PRD-4 is enlarged by the addition of the following described property: That part of Lot 1, Block 1, METRAM 1sT ADDITION, embraced within Lot 15, Block 1, EDINA INTERCHANGE CENTER THIRD ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. and That part of Lot 1, Block 1, METRAM 1sT ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying easterly of the east line of Lot 15, Block 1, EDINA INTERCHANGE CENTER THIRD ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. The extent of the Planned Residence District 3 PRD -3 is reduced by removing the property described above. Section 2. Effective Date: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon adoption and publication according to the law. Adopted this 20th day of July, 2004. First Reading: April 7, 2004 Second Reading: July 20, 2004 Published: Attest Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Dennis F. Maetzold, Mayor ."e ' - 11 ow e N less REPORT /RECOMMENDATION TO: Mayor and Council From: Craig Larsen City Planner � Date: August 17, 2.004 Subject: Ordinance 850.11 -Amending Edina Code Section 850.21 Floodplain Regulations Agenda Item # III. B. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ® Ordinance ❑ Discussion RECOMMENDATION:. The Planning Commission recommends adoption of the new Flood Plain ordinance. Staff recommends waiving second reading in order to satisfy the time line specified by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). INFO /BACKGROUND: The Ordinance has been reviewed and modified by the City Attorney to conform to City Code format. See attached Planning Commission minutes, staff memo, and August 2, 2004, letter from FEMA. M Planning Commission Minutes June 30, 2004 especially as it relates to the resid al neighborhood" is would allow for changes to the plan, possibly ' uding continuing erm. Commissioner enson said she d consider that as an amendment to her motion and epts the new w a. Chair n Byron calledhe vote. Ayes; Fischer, Swenson, Lonsbury, Brown, SWnerud, Workinger yron. Motion carried. II. OTHER BUSINESS: Amendment to the Flood Plain Ordinance Mr. Larsen informed the Commission in order for the City to participate in the flood insurance program the City must adopt the new amendment(s). Mr. Larsen said staff supports adoption of the amendments to the flood plain ordinance. Commissioner Workinger commented it was very difficult for him to peruse the enclosed ordinance amendment. He pointed out it is a lengthy and technical document. He added he wished staff had indicated the changes between documents. Mr. Larsen apologized and agreed the new code is both lengthy and technical. Continuing, he explained the current ordinance would be replaced by the proposed, with the majority of changes occurring in the mapping area, not language. The FEMA flood maps are retained in the Planning Department providing access to the maps to both staff and the public. At present the City retains six (6) FEMA maps and with new technology the City will now retain nine. Commissioner Workinger asked what that means to Edina residents. Mr. Larsen said the "short of it is" is that more residents may be able to purchase flood insurance if desired. The new maps should be more specific including changes that have occurred since 1980. Commissioner Lonsbury asked when the new maps are received and if the city disagrees with any of the findings can the City contest the new map. Mr. Larsen responded the City could contest any findings they deem significant. Individual property owners can also contest the findings. Mr. Larsen explained a small number of residents in the past have had their properties re- designated but it is a slow process. Concluding, Mr. Larsen said at this time the City has not received the new maps. Z Commissioner Workinger moved to recommend adoption of the Amendment to the Flood Plain Ordinance. Commissioner Lonsbury seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Commissioner Swenson addressed the C ission and said she would like to add on the agenda for future discussi accessory structures in the residential zoning districts." She added has observed a number of PODS being stored on residential propertie r "months ". Continuing, Commissioner Swenson said another concer. regard to accessory structure building height. Commissioner Woee added in his neighborho�y Bone constructed a "shed" tha ast in his opinion appear to "two- story", concluding it is very Mr. Re' responded staff would photos of ng structures and Commissi a later date. III. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 8:45 PM ier materials from different cities, bring the findings before the Jackie Hoogenakker 7 Memo To: Planning Commission From: Craig Larsen Date: 6/25/04 Re: Flood Plain Ordinance Attached is a draft of a new Flood Plain Ordinance. The ordinance is provided by FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). Adoption of the ordinance is mandatory in order to maintain flood insurance eligibility for Edina property owners. The new ordinance is not much different than the existing ordinance, which is also a FEMA model ordinance. We will also be getting new flood plain maps as part of this updating process. Our current maps date from 1980. Staff recommends approval of the amendment subject to review by the City Attorney for consistency with other chapters of the Zoning Ordinance. I . U.S. Department of Homeland Security 500 C Street, SW Washington, DC 20472 /OF'QA� \pq. y FEMA ND 56CJa AUG 2 2004 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED The Honorable Dennis Maetzold Mayor of the City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 -1330 Dear Mayor Maetzold: Please consider this an official reminder that your community has until September 2, 2004, to adopt floodplain management measures that satisfy Section 60.3(d) of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) regulations and have them approved by our Regional Office. I realize that your community may be in the final adoption process, or you may have recently adopted the appropriate measures. If you have not done so, please submit these measures to the Minnesota Floodplain Management Program in the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources - Waters where they will be reviewed upon receipt. You may reach Ogbazghi Sium, P.E., the NFIP State Coordinator, at (651) 296 -0444, or by mail at the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources - Waters, 500 Lafayette Road, St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 -4032, or by e-mail at obauhi.sium n,drinstate.mn.us. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Regional Office is also available to assist you with adoption of adequate floodplain management measures. Our Regional Office can be reached at (312) 408 -5548 or by mail. Send inquiries to Director, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Division, FEMA, 536 South Clark Street, Sixth Floor, Chicago, Illinois 60605. As in previous corre- spondence, we urge you to contact the NFIP State Coordinator or our Regional Office if your community is encountering difficulties in enacting the appropriate measures. The NFIP regulations (copy enclosed) identify certain floodplain management measures for adoption by participating communities. These measures need to be adopted by September 2, 2004, to avoid your community's suspension from the NFIP on that date. Please note that there is a significant consequence to a community that is suspended from participation in the NFIP in that flood insurance may not be sold or renewed within the community. It is important to also note that when a community is suspended from the NFIP, it is subject to the provisions of Section 202(a) of Public Law 93 -234, as amended. This section prohibits Federal officers or agencies from approving any form of loan, grant, guaranty, insurance, payment, rebate, subsidy, disaster assistance loan or grant, for acquisition or construction purposes within special www.fema.gov The Honorable Dennis Maetzold AUG 2 2004 Page 2 flood hazard areas. For example, this would prohibit mortgage loans guaranteed by the Department of Veterans Affairs, insured by the Federal Housing Administration, or secured by the Rural Economic and Community Development Services. In the case of disaster assistance under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act of 1988, as amended, this prohibition only applies to assistance in connection with a flood. Furthermore, Section 202(b) of P. L. 93 -234, as amended, requires federally regulated lending institutions to notify the purchaser or lessee of improved real property situated in a special flood hazard area whether Federal disaster assistance will be available when such property is being used to secure a loan that is being made, increased, extended or renewed. A suspended community can regain eligibility in the NFIP by submitting a new application and enacting the floodplain management measures established in Section 60.3 of the NFIP regulations. However, please note that during the period of suspension from the NFIP, if the community permits development to take place in the floodplain that aggravates the flood hazard, the community will be required to remedy the increased hazard to the maximum extent possible before eligibility can be restored. We encourage you to contact the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources or our Regional Office if you need assistance or have any questions. Our regional staff will provide technical assistance and guidance in the development of your community's floodplain management measures. The adoption of compliant floodplain management measures will ensure participation in the NFIP and will provide the citizens in your community protection from disaster. Sincerely, David I. Maurstad Acting Director Mitigation Division Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate DM:bl Enclosure cc: Mr. Craig Larsen, City of Edina Planning Director Regional Director, FEMA, Region V NFIP State Coordinator ORDINANCE NO. 2004-11 AMENDING SECTION 850.21 FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT The City Council of the City of Edina ordains: Section 1. Subsection 850.21 of the City Code is amended to read as follows: 11850.21 Floodplain Overlay District (FD). Subd. 1. Statutory Authorization, Findings Of Fact And Purpose A Statutory Authorization: The legislature of the State of Minnesota has, in Minnesota Statutes Chapter 103F and Chapter 462 delegated the responsibility to local government units to adopt regulations designed to minimize flood losses. Therefore, the Council does adopt this Subsection 850.21 B. Findings of Fact. In addition to the findings set forth in Subsection 850.01 of this Code, its is hereby further found and declared that: 1. The flood hazard areas of the City are subject to periodic inundation which results in potential loss of life, loss of property, health and safety hazards, disruption of commerce and governmental services, extraordinary public expenditures or flood protection and relief, and impairment of the tax base, all of which adversely affect the public health, safety, and general welfare. 2. Methods Used to Analyze Flood Hazards. This Subsection is based upon a reasonable method of analyzing flood hazards, which is consistent with the standards established by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. 3. National Flood Insurance Program Compliance. This Subsection is adopted to comply with the rules and regulations of the National Flood Insurance Program codified as 44 Code of Federal Regulations Parts 59 -78, as amended, so as to maintain the community's eligibility in the National Flood Insurance Program. C. Statement of Purpose: It is the purpose of this Subsection 850.21 to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare and to minimize those losses described in Subd. 1. of Paragraph B. of Subd. 1 of this Subsection 850.21 by provisions contained'herein. Subd. 2. DEFINITIONS. The words and phrases used in this Subsection 850.21 shall be interpreted so as to give them the same meaning as they have in common usage and so as to give this subsection its most reasonable application. However, they shall be subject to the rules of construction and definitions in Subsection 850.03 and, to the extent defined below shall have the following meanings for purposes of this Subsection Accessory Use or Structure. As defined in Subsection 850.03. Basement. Any area of a structure, including crawl spaces, having its floor or base subgrade (below ground level) on all four sides, regardless of the depth of excavation below ground level. This definition shall apply only to this Subsection 850.21 and for purposes of this Subsection, this definition shall control over the definition in Subsection 850.03. Conditional Use. As defined in Subsection 850.03. Ordinance No. 2004 -11 Page 2 Equal Degree of Encroachment. A method of determining the location of floodway boundaries so that flood plain lands on both sides of a stream are capable of conveying a proportionate share of flood flows. Flood. A temporary increase in the flow or stage of a stream or in the stage of a wetland or lake that results in the inundation of normally dry areas. Flood Frequency. The frequency for which it is expected that a specific flood stage or discharge may be equaled or exceeded. Flood Fringe. That portion of the flood plain outside of the floodway. Flood fringe is synonymous with the term "floodway fringe" used in the Flood Insurance Study for the City developed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Flood Plain. The beds proper and the areas adjoining a wetland, lake or watercourse which have been or hereafter may be covered by the regional flood. Flood Proofing. A combination of structural provisions, changes, or adjustments to properties and structures subject to flooding, primarily for the reduction or elimination of flood damages. Floodway. The bed of a wetland or lake portions of the adjoining flood plain which regional flood discharge. and the channel of a watercourse and those are reasonably required to carry or store the Lowest Floor. The lowest floor of the lowest enclosed area (including basement). An unfinished or flood resistant enclosure, used solely for parking of vehicles, building access, or storage in an area other than a basement area, is not considered a building's lowest floor. Manufactured Home. A structure, transportable in one or more sections, which is built on a permanent chassis and is designed for use with or without a permanent foundation when attached to the required utilities. The term "manufactured home" does not include the term "recreational vehicle." Map. The Official Flood Plain Zoning Map described in Subd. 3 of this Subsection 850.21. Obstruction. Any dam, wall, wharf, embankment, levee, dike, pile, abutment, projection, excavation, channel modification, culvert, building, wire, fence, stockpile, refuse, fill, structure, or matter in, along, across, or projecting into any channel, watercourse, or regulatory flood plain which may impede, retard, or change the direction of the flow of water, either in itself or by catching or collecting debris carried by such water. Principal Use or Structure. Means all uses or structures that are not accessory uses or structures. Reach. A hydraulic engineering term to describe a longitudinal segment of a stream or river influenced by a natural or man-made obstruction. In an urban area, the segment of a stream or river between two consecutive bridge crossings would most typically constitute a reach. Recreational Vehicle. A vehicle that is built on a single chassis, is 400 square feet or less when measured at the largest horizontal projection, is designed to be self - propelled or Ordinance No. 2004 -11. Page 3 permanently towable by a light duty truck, and is designed primarily not for use as a permanent dwelling but as temporary living quarters for recreational, camping, travel, or seasonal use. For the purposes of this Subsection, the term recreational vehicle shall be synonymous with the term travel trailer /travel vehicle. Regional Flood. A flood which is representative of large floods known to have occurred generally in Minnesota and reasonably characteristic of what can be expected to occur on an average frequency in the magnitude of the 100 -year recurrence interval. Regional flood is synonymous with the term "base flood" used in the Flood Insurance Study prepared for the City. Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation. The regulatory flood protection elevation shall be an elevation no lower than one foot above the elevation of the regional flood plus any increases in flood elevation caused by encroachments on the flood plain that result from designation of a floodway. Structure. As defined in Subsection 850.03. Substantial Damage. Damage of any origin sustained by a structure where the cost of restoring the structure to its before damaged condition would equal or exceed 50 percent of the market value of the structure before the damage occurred. Substantial Improvement. Within any consecutive 365 -day period, any reconstruction, rehabilitation (including normal maintenance and repair), repair after damage, addition, or other improvement of a structure, the cost of which equals or exceeds 50 percent of the market value of the structure before the "start of construction" of the improvement. This term includes structures that have incurred "substantial damage," regardless of the actual repair work performed. The term does not, however, include either: (a) Any project for improvement of a structure to correct existing violations of state or local health, sanitary, or safety code specifications which have been identified by the local code enforcement official and which are the minimum necessary to assure safe living conditions. (b) Any alteration of an "historic structure," provided that the alteration will not preclude the structure's continued designation as an "historic structure." For the purpose of this Subsection, "historic structure" shall be as defined in Code of Federal Regulations, Part 59.1. Variance. Means a modification of a specific permitted development standard required by any section of this Code, including this Subsection 850.21, to allow an alternative development standard not stated as acceptable in the applicable section of this Code, but only as applied to a particular property for the purpose of alleviating an undue hardship, as defined and elaborated upon in Subsection 850.04. Subd. 3. General Provisions A. Lands to Which Subsection Applies: This Subsection shall apply to all lands within the jurisdiction of the City shown on the Official Floodplain Zoning Map (hereinafter described) and/or the attachments thereto as being located within the boundaries of the Floodway, Flood Fringe, or General Flood Plain Districts. B. Establishment of Official Floodplain Zoning Map. The Map, a composite copy of which, reduced in size, is appended to this Code, together with all materials attached thereto is Ordinance No. 2004 -11 Page 4 hereby adopted by reference and declared to be a part of this Subsection 850.21. The attached material shall include the Flood Insurance Study, Volume 1 of 2 and Volume 2 of 2, Hennepin County, Minnesota, All Jurisdictions and the Flood Insurance Rate Map panels numbered 27053C0342E, 27053C0344E, 27053C0361E, 27053C0362E, 27053C0363E, 27053C0364E, 27053C0432E, 27053C0451E, AND 27053CO452E for the City, dated September 2, 2004, as developed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. The Map shall be on file in the office of the Planner. C. Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation: The regulatory flood protection elevation shall be an elevation no lower than one foot above the elevation of the regional flood plus any increases in flood elevation caused by encroachments on the flood plain that result from designation of a floodway. D. Interpretation: 1. In their interpretation and application, the provisions of this Subsection 850.21 shall be held to be minimum requirements and shall be liberally construed in favor of the City and shall not be deemed a limitation or repeal of any other powers granted by applicable ordinances or state law. 2. The boundaries of the zoning districts shall be determined by scaling distances on the Map. Where interpretation is needed as to the exact location of the boundaries of the district as shown on the Map, as for example where there appears to be a conflict between a mapped boundary and actual field conditions and there is a formal appeal of the decision of the Planner, the Board shall make the necessary interpretation. All decisions will be based on elevations on the regional (100 -year) flood profile, the ground elevations that existed on the site at the time the City adopted its initial floodplain ordinance, and other available technical data. Persons contesting the location of the district boundaries shall be given a reasonable opportunity to present their case to the Board and to submit technical evidence. E. Abrogation and Greater Restrictions: It is not intended by this Subsection 850.21 to repeal, abrogate, or impair any existing easements, covenants, or deed restrictions. However, where this Subsection imposes greater restrictions, the provisions of this Subsection shall prevail. F. Warning and Disclaimer of Liability: This Subsection 850.21 does not imply that areas outside the flood plain districts or land uses permitted within such districts will be free from flooding or flood damages. This Subsection shall not create liability on the part of the City or any officer or employee thereof for any flood damages that result from reliance on this Subsection or any City action taken or administrative Board, Commission or Council decision lawfully made thereunder. G. Other Zoning Districts and Provisions: The inclusion of land within the Floodplain Overlay District shall not change or affect, in any way, the uses allowed on, and the restrictions and requirements then or thereafter applicable to, the land under any other zoning classification in which the land is then or thereafter located, all of which shall continue to apply, but the additional restrictions of the Floodplain Overlay District shall also apply to such land. Where the provisions in this Subsection 850.21 are inconsistent with or contradictory to the provisions in any other section of this Code, then the most stringent provisions shall apply and be complied with. Ordinance No. 2004 -11 Page 5 H. Severability: If any section, clause, provision, or portion of this Subsection is adjudged unconstitutional or invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of this Subsection shall not be affected thereby. Subd. 4 Establishment Of Zoning Districts A. Districts. 1. Floodway District (FW). The Floodway District shall include those areas designated as floodway on the Map. 2. Flood Fringe District (FF). The Flood Fringe District shall include those areas designated as floodway fringe. The Flood Fringe District shall include those areas shown on the Map as being within Zone AE, Zone A0, or Zone AH but being located outside of the floodway. 3. General Flood Plain District or Floodplain Overlay District (FD). The General Flood Plain District shall include those areas designated as Zone A or Zones AE, Zone A0, or Zone AH without a floodway on the Map. B. Compliance. No new structure or land shall hereafter be used and no structure shall be constructed, located, extended, converted, or structurally altered without full compliance with the terms of this Subsection and other applicable regulations which apply to uses within the jurisdiction of this Code. Within the Floodway District, Flood Fringe District and General Flood Plain District, all uses not listed as permitted uses or conditional uses in Subds. 5, 6 and 7 of this Subsection 850.21, shall be prohibited. In addition, a caution is provided here that: 1. New manufactured homes and replacement manufactured homes are subject to the general provisions of this Section 850 and specifically Subd. 10 of this Subsection 850.21. 2. Modifications, additions, structural alterations, normal maintenance and repair, or repair after damage to existing nonconforming structures and nonconforming uses of structures or land are regulated by the general provisions of this Section 850 and specifically Subd. 12 of this Subsection 850.21. 3. As -built elevations for elevated or flood proofed structures must be certified by ground surveys and flood proofing techniques must be designed and certified by a registered professional engineer or architect as specified in the general provisions of this Code and specifically as stated in Subd. 11 of this Subsection 850.21. 4. Mobile homes and mobile home parks, and recreational vehicles are prohibited in the General Flood Plain District. Subd. 5 Floodway District (FW) A. Permitted Uses. The following uses are permitted in the Floodway District if they comply with the standards set out in paragraph B. of this Subd. 5: 1. General farming, pasture, grazing, outdoor plant nurseries, horticulture, truck farming, forestry, sod farming, and wild crop harvesting. Ordinance No. 2004 -11 Page 6 2. Industrial - commercial loading areas, parking areas, and airport landing strips. 3. Private and public golf courses, tennis courts, driving ranges, archery ranges, picnic grounds, boat launching ramps, swimming areas, parks, wildlife and nature preserves, game farms, fish hatcheries, shooting preserves, target ranges, trap and skeet ranges, hunting and fishing areas, and single or multiple purpose recreational trails. 4. Residential lawns, gardens, parking areas, and play areas. B. Standards for Floodway District Permitted Uses. 1. The use shall be a permitted use in the underlying zoning district established by this Subsection 5. 2. The use shall have a low flood damage potential. 3. The use shall be permissible in the underlying zoning district if one exists. 4. The use shall not obstruct flood flows or increase flood elevations and shall not involve structures, fill, obstructions, excavations or storage of materials or equipment. C. Conditional Uses. The following uses are conditional uses in the Floodway District and shall be allowed only if they comply with the standards set out in paragraph D. of this Subd. 5 and then only pursuant to the issuance of a conditional use permit. 1 Structures accessory to the uses listed in paragraph A above and the uses listed in subparagraphs 2 -7 below. 2 Extraction and storage of sand, gravel, and other materials. 3 Marinas, boat rentals, docks, piers, wharves, and water control structures. 4. Railroads, streets, bridges, utility transmission lines, and pipelines. 5. Storage yards for equipment, machinery, or materials. 6. Placement of fill or construction of fences. 7. Structural works for flood control such as levees, dikes and floodwalls constructed to any height where the intent is to protect individual structures and levees or dikes where the intent is to protect agricultural crops for a frequency flood event equal to or less than the 10 -year frequency flood event. D. Standards for Floodway District Conditional Uses: 1. All Uses. No structure (temporary or permanent), fill (including fill for roads and levees), deposit, obstruction, storage of materials or equipment, or other uses may be allowed as a conditional use that will cause any increase in the stage of the 100 -year or regional flood or cause an increase in flood damages in the reach or reaches affected. Ordinance No. 2004 -11 Page 7 2. All floodway conditional uses shall be subject to the procedures and standards contained in paragraph D. of Subd. 11 of this Subsection 850.21. 3. The conditional use shall be permissible in the underlying zoning district established by this Section 850. 4. Fill: a. fill, dredge spoil, and all other similar materials deposited or stored in the flood plain shall be protected from erosion by vegetative cover, mulching, riprap or other acceptable method. b. dredge spoil sites and sand and gravel operations shall not be allowed in the floodway unless a long -term site development plan is submitted which includes an erosion/sedimentation prevention element to the plan. c. as an alternative, and consistent with subparagraph b. immediately above, dredge spoil disposal and sand and gravel operations may allow temporary, on -site storage of fill or other materials which would have caused an increase to the stage of the 100 -year or regional flood but only after the City has received an appropriate plan which assures the removal of the materials from the floodway based upon the flood warning time available. The conditional use permit must be title filed for record against the property in the Hennepin County real estate records. 5. Accessory Structures: a. Accessory structures shall not be designed for human habitation. b. Accessory structures, if permitted, shall be constructed and placed on the building site so as to offer the minimum obstruction to the flow of flood waters: (i) Whenever possible, structures shall be constructed with the longitudinal axis parallel to the direction of flood flow; and (ii) So far as practicable, structures shall be placed approximately on the same flood flow lines as those of adjoining structures. c. Accessory structures shall be elevated on fill or structurally dry flood proofed in accordance with the FM or FP -2 flood proofing classifications in the Building Code. As an alternative, an accessory structure may be flood proofed to the FP -3 or FP-4 flood proofing classification in the Building Code provided the accessory structure constitutes a minimal investment, does not exceed 500 square feet in size at its largest projection, and for a detached garage, the detached garage must be used solely for parking of vehicles and limited storage. All flood proofed accessory structures must meet the following additional standards: (i) The structure must be adequately anchored to prevent flotation, collapse or lateral movement of the structure and shall be designed to equalize hydrostatic flood forces on exterior walls; (ii) Any mechanical and utility equipment in a structure must be elevated to or above the regulatory flood protection elevation or properly flood proofed; and Ordinance No. 2004 -11 Page 8 (iii) To allow for the equalization of hydrostatic pressure, there must be a minimum of two "automatic' openings in the outside walls of the structure having a total net area of not less than one square inch for every square foot of enclosed area subject to flooding. There must be openings on at least two sides of the structure and the bottom of all openings must be no higher than one foot above the lowest adjacent grade to the structure. Using human intervention to open a garage door prior to flooding will not satisfy this requirement for automatic openings. 6. Storage of Materials and Equipment: a. The storage or processing of materials that are, in time of flooding, flammable, explosive, or potentially injurious to human, animal, or plant life is prohibited. b. Storage of other materials or equipment may be allowed if readily removable from the area within the time available after a flood warning and in accordance with a plan approved by the Planner. 7. Structural works for flood control that will change the course, current or cross section of protected wetlands or public waters shall be subject to the provisions of Minnesota Statute, Chapter 103G. Community-wide structural works for flood control intended to remove areas from the regulatory flood plain shall not be allowed in the floodway. 8. A levee, dike or floodwall constructed in the floodway shall not cause an increase to the 100 -year or regional flood and the technical analysis must assume equal conveyance or storage loss on both sides of a stream. Subd. 6 Flood Fringe District (FF) A. Permitted Uses: Permitted uses shall be those uses of land or structures listed as permitted uses in the underlying zoning use districts established by this Section 850. All permitted uses shall comply with the standards listed in paragraphs B. and E. of this Subd. 6. B. Standards for Flood Fringe District Permitted Uses: 1. All structures, including accessory structures, must be elevated on fill so that the lowest floor including basement floor is at or above the regulatory flood protection elevation. The finished fill elevation for structures shall be no lower than one (1) foot below the regulatory flood protection elevation and the fill shall extend at such elevation at least fifteen (15) feet beyond the outside limits of the structure erected thereon. 2. As an alternative to elevation on fill, accessory structures that constitute a minimal investment and that do not exceed 500 square feet at its largest projection may be internally flood proofed in accordance with part c. of subparagraph 5. of paragraph D. of Subd. 5 of this Subsection 850.21. 3. The cumulative placement of fill where at any one time in excess of one- thousand (1,000) cubic yards of fill is located on the parcel shall be allowable only Ordinance No. 2004 -11 Page 9 as a conditional use, unless said fill is specifically intended to elevate a structure in accordance with subparagraph 1. of paragraph B. of this Subd. 6. 4. The storage of any materials or equipment shall be elevated on fill to the regulatory flood protection elevation. 5. The provisions of paragraph E. of this Subd. 6 shall apply. C. Conditional Uses: Any structure that is not elevated on fill or flood proofed in accordance with subparagraphs 1. and 2. of paragraph B. of this Subd. 6 and or any use of land that does not comply with the standards in subparagraphs 3. and 4. of paragraph B. of this Subd. 6 shall only be allowable as a conditional use and then only if pursuant to the issuance of a conditional use permit. An application for a conditional use shall be subject to the standards and criteria and evaluation procedures specified in paragraphs D. and E. of this Subd 6 and paragraph D. of Subd. 11 of this Subsection 850.21. D. Standards for Flood Fringe District Conditional Uses. 1. Alternative elevation methods other than the use of fill may be utilized to elevate a structure's lowest floor above the regulatory flood protection elevation. These alternative methods may include the use of stilts, pilings, parallel walls, etc., or above - grade, enclosed areas such as crawl spaces or tuck under garages. The base or floor of an enclosed area shall be considered above -grade and not a structure's basement or lowest floor if. 1) the enclosed area is above -grade on at least one side of the structure; 2) it is designed to internally flood and is constructed with flood resistant materials; and 3) it is used solely for parking of vehicles, building access or storage. The above -noted alternative elevation methods are subject to the following additional standards: a. Design and Certification - The structure's design and as -built condition must be certified by a registered professional engineer or architect as being in compliance with the general design standards of the Building Code and, specifically, that all electrical, heating, ventilation, plumbing and air conditioning equipment and other service facilities must be at or above the regulatory flood protection elevation or be designed to prevent flood water from entering or accumulating within these components during times of flooding. b. Specific Standards for Above - grade, Enclosed Areas - Above - grade, fully enclosed areas such as crawl spaces or tuck under garages must be designed to internally flood and the design plans must stipulate: (i) A minimum area of openings in the walls where internal flooding is to be used as a flood proofing technique. There shall be a minimum of two openings on at least two sides of the structure and the bottom of all openings shall be no higher than one -foot above grade. The automatic openings shall have a minimum net area of not less than one square inch for every square foot subject to flooding unless a registered professional engineer or architect certifies that a smaller net area would suffice. The automatic openings may be equipped with screens, louvers, valves, or other coverings or devices provided that they permit the automatic entry and exit of flood waters without any form of human intervention; and Ordinance No. 2004 -11 Page 10 (ii) That the enclosed area will be designed of flood resistant materials in accordance with the FP -3 or FP4 classifications in the Building Code and shall be used solely for building access, parking of vehicles or storage. 2. Basements shall be subject to the following:. a. Residential basement construction shall not be allowed below the regulatory flood protection elevation. b. Non - residential basements may be allowed below the regulatory flood protection elevation provided the basement is structurally dry flood proofed in accordance with subparagraph 3. of paragraph D. of Subd 6 of this Subsection. 3. All areas of non residential structures including basements to be placed below the regulatory flood protection elevation shall be flood proofed in accordance with the structurally dry flood proofing classifications in the Building Code. Structurally dry flood proofing must meet the FP -1 or FP -2 flood proofing classification in the Building Code and this shall require making the structure watertight with the walls substantially impermeable to the passage of water and with structural components having the capability of resisting hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads and the effects of buoyancy. Structures flood proofed to the FP -3 or FP4 classification shall not be permitted. 4. When at any one time more than 1,000 cubic yards of fill or other similar material is located on a parcel for such activities as on -site storage, landscaping, sand and gravel operations, landfills, roads, dredge spoil disposal or construction of flood control works, an erosion/sedimentation control plan must be submitted to the Planner. The plan must clearly specify methods to be used to stabilize the fill on site for a flood event at a minimum of the 100 -year or regional flood event. The plan must be prepared and certified by a registered professional engineer or other qualified individual acceptable to the Planner. The plan may incorporate alternative procedures for removal of the material from the flood plain if adequate flood warning time exists. 5. Storage of Materials and Equipment: a. The storage or processing of materials that are, in time of flooding, flammable, explosive, or potentially injurious to human, animal, or plant life is prohibited. b. Storage of other materials or equipment may be allowed if readily removable from the area within the time available after a flood warning and in accordance with a plan approved by the Governing Body. 6. The provisions of paragraph E. of Subd. 6 of this Subsection shall also apply. E. Standards for All Flood Fringe District Uses. 1. All new principal structures must have vehicular access at or above an elevation not more than two (2) feet below the regulatory flood protection elevation. If a variance to this requirement is granted, the Board must specify limitations on the period of use or occupancy of the structure for times of flooding and only after Ordinance No. 2004 -11 Page 11 determining that adequate flood warning time and local flood emergency response procedures exist. 2. Accessory commercial uses of land, such as yards, railroad tracks, and parking lots may be at elevations lower than the regulatory flood protection elevation. However, a permit for such facilities to be used by the employees or the general public shall not be granted in the absence of a flood warning system that provides adequate time for evacuation if the area would be inundated to a depth and velocity such that when multiplying the depth (in feet) times velocity (in feet per second) the product number exceeds four (4) upon occurrence of the regional flood. 3. For manufacturing and industrial uses measures shall be taken to minimize interference with normal plant operations especially along streams having protracted flood durations. Certain accessory land uses such as yards and parking lots may be at lower elevations subject to requirements set out in subparagraph 2. of paragraph E. above. In considering permit applications, due consideration shall be given to needs of an industry whose business requires that it be located in flood plain areas. 4. Fill shall be properly compacted and the slopes shall be properly protected by the use of riprap, vegetative cover or other acceptable method. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has established criteria for removing the special flood hazard area designation for certain structures properly elevated on fill above the 100 -year flood elevation, FEMA's requirements incorporate specific fill compaction and side slope protection standards for multi - structure or multi-lot developments. These standards should be investigated prior to the initiation of site preparation if a change of special flood hazard area designation will be requested. 5. Flood plain developments shall not adversely affect the hydraulic capacity of the channel and adjoining flood plain of any tributary watercourse or drainage system where a floodway or other encroachment limit has not been specified on the Map. 6. All manufactured homes must be securely anchored to an adequately anchored foundation system that resists flotation, collapse and lateral movement. Methods of anchoring may include, but are not to be limited to, use of over- the -top or frame ties to ground anchors. This requirement is in addition to applicable state or local anchoring requirements for resisting wind forces. 7. No use shall be allowed as a permitted or conditional use unless such use has received all required approvals from all other governmental bodies having jurisdiction. Subd. 7. General Flood Plain District (FD) A. Permissible Uses. The following uses are permitted in the General Flood Plain District: 1. The uses listed in paragraph A. of Subd 5 of this Subsection 850.21 shall be permitted uses. 2 All other uses shall be subject to the. floodway /flood fringe evaluation criteria pursuant paragraph B. below. Subd. 5 of this Subsection 850.21 shall apply if the proposed use is in the Floodway District and Subd. 6 of this Subsection 850.21 shall apply if the proposed use is in the Flood Fringe District. Ordinance No. 2004 -11 Page 12 B. Procedures for Floodway District and Flood Fringe District Determinations Within the General Flood Plain District. 1. Upon receipt of an application for a permit or other approval within the General Flood Plain District, the applicant shall be required to furnish such of the following information as is deemed necessary by the Planner for the determination of the regulatory flood protection elevation and whether the proposed use is within the Floodway District or Flood Fringe District. a. A typical valley cross - section(s) showing the channel of the stream, elevation of land areas adjoining each side of the channel, cross - sectional areas to be occupied by the proposed development, and high water information. b. Plan (surface view) showing elevations or contours of the ground, pertinent structure, fill, or storage elevations, the size, location, and spatial arrangement of all proposed and existing structures on the site, and the location and elevations of streets. c. Photographs showing existing land uses, vegetation upstream and downstream, and soil types. d. Profile showing the slope of the bottom of the channel or flow line of the stream for at least 500 feet in either direction from the proposed development. 2 The applicant shall be responsible to submit one copy of the above information to a designated engineer or other expert person or agency for technical assistance in determining whether the proposed use is in the Floodway District or Flood Fringe District and to determine the regulatory flood protection elevation. Procedures consistent with Minnesota Regulations 1983, Parts 6120.5000 - 6120.6200 and 44 Code of Federal Regulations Part 65 shall be followed in this expert evaluation. The designated engineer or expert is strongly encouraged to discuss the proposed technical evaluation methodology with the respective Department of Natural Resources' Area Hydrologist prior to commencing the analysis. The designated engineer or expert shall: a. Estimate the peak discharge of the regional flood. b. Calculate the water surface profile of the regional flood based upon a hydraulic analysis of the stream channel and overbank areas. c. Compute the floodway necessary to convey or store the regional flood without increasing flood stages more than 0.5 foot. A lesser stage increase than .5' shall be required if, as a result of the additional stage increase, increased flood damages would result. An equal degree of encroachment on both sides of the stream within the reach shall be assumed in computing floodway boundaries. 3. The Planner shall present the technical evaluation and findings of the designated engineer or expert to the Council. The Council must formally accept the technical evaluation and the recommended Floodway District and/or Flood Fringe District boundary or deny the permit application. The Council, prior to official action, may Ordinance No. 2004 -11 Page 13 submit the application and all supporting data and analyses to the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the Department of Natural Resources or the Planning Commission for review and comment. Once the Floodway and Flood Fringe District Boundaries have been determined, the Council shall refer the matter back to the Planner who shall process the permit application consistent with the applicable provisions of Subds. 5 and 6 of this Subsection. Subd.8 Subdivisions. A. Review Criteria: No land shall be platted or subdivided, as defined in Section 810 of this Code, which is unsuitable for the reason of flooding, inadequate drainage, water supply or sewage treatment facilities. All lots within the General Flood Plain District shall be able to contain a building site outside of the Floodway District at or above the regulatory flood protection elevation. All subdivisions shall have water and sewage treatment facilities that comply with the provisions of this Subsection and have road access both to the subdivision and to the individual building sites no lower than two feet below the regulatory flood protection elevation. For all subdivisions in the flood plain, the Floodway District and Flood Fringe District boundaries, the regulatory flood protection elevation and the required elevation of all access roads shall be clearly labeled on all required subdivision drawings and platting documents. B. Floodway/Flood Fringe Determinations in the General Flood Plain District: In the General Flood Plain District, applicants shall provide the information required in paragraph B. of Subd. 7 of this Subsection 850.21 to determine the 100 -year flood elevation, the Floodway District and Flood Fringe District boundaries and the regulatory flood protection elevation for the subdivision site. C. Removal of Special Flood Hazard Area Designation: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) has established criteria for removing the special flood hazard area designation for certain structures properly elevated on fill above the 100 -year flood elevation. FEMA's requirements incorporate specific fill compaction and side slope protection standards for multi- structure or multi-lot developments. These standards should be investigated prior to the initiation of site preparation if a change of special flood hazard area designation will be requested. Subd. 9 Public Utilities, Railroads, Roads, And Bridges. A. Public Utilities. All public utilities and facilities such as gas, electrical, sewer, and water supply systems to be located in the flood plain shall be flood proofed in accordance with the Building Code or elevated to above the regulatory flood protection elevation. B. Public Transportation Facilities. Railroad tracks, roads, and bridges to be located within the flood plain shall comply with Subd. 5 and 6 of this Subsection 850.21. Elevation to the regulatory flood protection elevation shall be provided where failure or interruption of these transportation facilities would result in danger to the public health or safety or where such facilities are essential to the orderly functioning of the area. Minor or auxiliary roads or railroads may be constructed at a lower elevation where failure or interruption of transportation services would not endanger the public health or safety. C. On -site Sewage Treatment and Water Supply Systems: Where public utilities are not provided: 1) On -site water supply systems must be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration of flood waters into the systems; and 2) New or replacement on -site sewage treatment systems must be designed to minimize or eliminate infiltration of flood waters into the systems and discharges from the systems into flood waters and they shall not be subject Ordinance No. 2004 -11. Page 14 to impairment or contamination during times of flooding. Any sewage treatment system designed in accordance with the State's current statewide standards for on -site sewage treatment systems shall be determined to be in compliance with this Subsection 850.21. Subd. 10 Manufactured Homes. A. The placement of new or replacement manufactured homes in existing manufactured home parks or on individual lots of record that are located in flood plain districts will be treated as a new structure and may be placed only if elevated in compliance with Subd. 6 of this Subsection 850.21. If vehicular road access for pre - existing manufactured home parks is not provided in accordance with subparagraph 1. of paragraph E. of Subd. 6 of this Subsection 850.21, then replacement manufactured homes will not be allowed until the property owner(s) develops a flood warning emergency plan acceptable to the Governing Body. B. All manufactured homes must be securely anchored to an adequately anchored foundation system that resists flotation, collapse and lateral movement. Methods of anchoring may include, but are not to be limited to, use of over -the -top or frame ties to ground anchors. This requirement is in addition to applicable state or local anchoring requirements for resisting wind forces. Subd. II Administration A. Planner: The Planner shall administer and enforce this Subsection. If the Planner finds a violation of the provisions of this Subsection the Planner shall notify the person responsible for such violation in accordance with the procedures stated in Subd. 13 of the Subsection 850.21. B. Permit Requirements: 1. Permit Required. A permit issued by the Planner in conformation with the provisions of this Subsection 850.21 shall be obtained prior to the erection, addition, modification, rehabilitation (including normal maintenance and repair), or alteration of any building, structure, or portion thereof; prior to the use or change of use of a building, structure, or land; prior to the construction of a dam, fence, or on -site septic system; prior to the change or extension of a nonconforming use; prior to the repair of a structure that has been damaged by flood, fire, tornado, or any other source; and prior to the placement of fill, excavation of materials, or the storage of materials or equipment within the flood plain. 2 Application for Permit. Application for a permit shall be made in duplicate to the Planner on forms furnished by the Planner and shall include the following where applicable: plans in duplicate drawn to scale, showing the nature, location, dimensions, and elevations of the lot; existing or proposed structures, fill, or storage of materials; and the location of the foregoing in relation to the stream channel. 3. State and Federal Permits. Prior to granting a permit or processing an application for a conditional use permit or variance, the Planner shall determine that the applicant has obtained all necessary state and federal permits. 4. Certificate of Zoning Compliance for a New, Altered, or Nonconforming Use. It shall be unlawful to use, occupy, or permit the use or occupancy of any building or premises or part thereof hereafter created, erected, changed, converted, altered, or Ordinance No. 2004 -11 Page 15 enlarged in its use or structure until a certificate of zoning compliance shall have been issued by the Planner stating that the use of the building or land conforms to the requirements of this Subsection. 5. Construction and Use to be as Provided on Applications, Plans, Permits, Variances and Certificates of Zoning Compliance. Permits, conditional use permits, or certificates of zoning compliance issued on the basis of approved plans and applications authorize only the use, arrangement, and construction set forth in such approved plans and applications, and no other use, arrangement, or construction. Any use, arrangement, or construction at variance with that authorized shall be deemed a violation of this Subsection, and punishable as provided by Subd. 13 of this Subsection 850.21. 6. Certification. The applicant shall be required to submit certification by a registered professional engineer, registered architect, or registered land surveyor that the finished fill and building elevations were accomplished in compliance with the provisions of this Subsection. Flood proofing measures shall be certified by a registered professional engineer or registered architect. 7. Record of First Floor Elevation. The Planner shall maintain a record of the elevation of the lowest floor (including basement) of all new structures and alterations or additions to existing structures in the flood plain. The Planner shall also maintain a record of the elevation to which structures or alterations and additions to structures are flood proofed. 8. Notifications for Watercourse Alterations. The Planner shall notify, in riverine situations, adjacent communities and the Commissioner of the Department of Natural Resources prior to the community authorizing any alteration or relocation of a watercourse. If the applicant has applied for a permit to work in the beds of public waters pursuant to Minnesota Statute, Chapter 103G, this shall suffice as adequate notice to the Commissioner of Natural Resources. A copy of said notification shall also be submitted to the Chicago Regional Office of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 9. Notification to FEMA When Physical Changes Increase or Decrease the 100 - year Flood Elevation. As soon as is practicable, but not later than six (6) months after the date such supporting information becomes available, the Planner shall notify the Chicago Regional Office of FEMA of the changes by submitting a copy of said technical or scientific data. C. Board of Approvals: 1. Rules. The Board shall adopt rules for the conduct of business and may exercise all of the powers conferred on such Board by State law. 2. Administrative Review. The Board shall hear and decide appeals where it is alleged there is error in any order, requirement, decision, or determination made by an administrative official in the enforcement or administration of this Subsection, and all requests for variances in connection with this Subsection 850.21, in the same manner, including notices, as it hears and decides appeals and requests for variances under Subsection 850.04, except as otherwise provided herein. Ordinance No. 2004 -11 Page 16 3. Variances. The Board may authorize variances from the terms of this Subsection only in the event that strict enforcement of the literal provisions of this Subsection 850.21 will cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration and only if the action will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of this Subsection 850. Undue hardship shall have the same meaning and shall be interpreted in the same way, as in Subd. 1 of Subsection 850.04. In the granting of such variance, the Board shall clearly identify in writing the specific conditions that existed consistent with the criteria specified in this Subsection 850.21 and Section 850.04, and in the respective enabling legislation that justified the granting of the variance. No variance shall have the effect of allowing in any district uses prohibited in that district, permit a lower degree of flood protection than the regulatory flood protection elevation for the particular area, or permit standards lower than those required by state law. The following additional variance criteria of the Federal Emergency Management Agency must be satisfied: a. Variances shall not be issued by a community within any designated regulatory floodway if any increase in flood levels during the base flood discharge would result. b. Variances shall only be issued by a community upon (i) a showing of good and sufficient cause, (ii) a determination that failure to grant the variance would result in exceptional hardship to the applicant, and (iii) a determination that the granting of a variance will not result in increased flood heights, additional threats to public safety, extraordinary public expense, create nuisances, cause fraud on or victimization of the public, or conflict with existing local laws or Subsections. c. Variances shall only be issued upon a determination that the variance is the minimum necessary, considering the flood hazard, to afford relief. 4. Hearings. Upon filing with the Board of an appeal from a decision of the Planner, or an application for a variance, the Board shall hold a hearing therein as provided in Subd. 1 of Subsection 850.04. The Board shall submit by mail to the Commissioner of Natural Resources a copy of the application for proposed variances sufficiently in advance so that the Commissioner will receive at least ten days notice of the hearing. 5. Decisions. The Board shall arrive at a decision on such appeal or variance as provided in Subd. 1 of Subsection 850.04. In passing upon an appeal, the Board may, so long as such action is in conformity with the provisions of this Subsection, reverse or affirm, wholly or in part, or modify the order, requirement, decision or determination of the Planner or other public official. It shall make its decision in writing setting forth the findings of fact and the reasons for its decisions. In granting a variance the Board may prescribe appropriate conditions and safeguards such as those specified in subparagraph 6 of paragraph D of Subd. 11 of this Subsection 850.21, which are in conformity with the purposes of this Subsection. Violations of such conditions and safeguards, when made a part of the terms under which the variance is granted, shall be deemed a violation of this Subsection 850.21 punishable under Subd. 13 of this Subsection 850.21. A copy of all decisions granting variances shall be forwarded by mail to the Commissioner of Natural Resources within ten (10) days of such action. Ordinance No. 2004 -11 Page 17 6. Appeals. Appeals from any decision of the Board may be made, and as specified in Subd. 1 of Subsection 850.04. 7. Flood Insurance Notice and Record Keeping. The Planner shall notify the applicant for a variance that: 1) The issuance of a variance to construct a structure below the base flood level will result in increased premium rates for flood insurance up to amounts as high as $25 for $100 of insurance coverage and 2) Such construction below the 100 -year or regional flood level increases risks to life and property. Such notification shall be maintained with a record of all variance actions. A community shall maintain a record of all variance actions, including justification for their issuance, and report such variances issued in its annual or biennial report submitted to the Administrator of the National Flood Insurance Program. D. Conditional Uses. 1. Notice to Commissioner. Upon filing with the City of an application for a conditional use permit, the City shall submit by mail to the Commissioner of Natural Resources a copy of the application for proposed conditional use sufficiently in advance so that the Commissioner will receive at least ten days notice of the hearing. 2. Planning Commission. The Commission shall hear all requests for conditional use permits under this Subsection 850.21, and shall make its recommendation to the Council, in the same manner, including notices, as it hears and reviews applications for conditional use permits under Subsection 850.04. 3. Council. The Council shall hear all requests for conditional use permits under this Subsection 850.21, and shall make its decision thereon, in the same manner, including notices, and subject to the same requirements and conditions, as it hears and decides upon applications for conditional use permits under Subsection 850.04. In granting a conditional use permit the City Council shall prescribe appropriate conditions and safeguards, in addition to those specified in subparagraph 6. of paragraph D. of Subd. 11 of this subsection, which are in conformity with the purposes of this Subsection. Violations of such conditions and safeguards, when made a part of the terms under which the conditional use permit is granted, shall be deemed a violation of this Subsection punishable under Subd. 13 of this Subsection. A copy of all decisions granting conditional use permits shall be forwarded by mail to the Commissioner of Natural Resources within ten (10) days of such action. 4. Procedures to be followed by the City Council in Passing on Conditional Use Permit Applications Within all Flood Plain Districts. a. Require the applicant to furnish such of the following information and additional information as deemed necessary by the City Council for determining the suitability of the particular site for the proposed use: (i) Plans in triplicate drawn to scale showing the nature, location, dimensions, and elevation of the lot, existing or proposed structures, fill, storage of materials, flood proofing measures, and the relationship of the above to the location of the stream channel; and (ii) Specifications for building construction and materials, flood proofing, filling, dredging, grading, channel improvement, storage of materials, water supply and sanitary facilities. Ordinance No. 2004 -11 Page 18 b. Transmit one copy of the information described in subpararaph a. above to a designated engineer or other expert person or agency for technical assistance, where necessary, in evaluating the proposed project in relation to flood heights and velocities, the seriousness of flood damage to the use, the adequacy of the plans for protection, and other technical matters. c. Based upon the technical evaluation of the designated engineer or expert, the Council shall determine the specific flood hazard at the site and evaluate the suitability of the proposed use in relation to the flood hazard. 5. Factors Upon Which the Decision of the Council Shall Be Based. In passing upon conditional use applications, the Council shall consider all relevant factors specified in other sections of this Subsection 850.21, and: a. The danger to life and property due to increased flood heights or velocities caused by encroachments. b. The danger that materials may be swept onto other lands or downstream to the injury of others or they may block bridges, culverts or other hydraulic structures. c. The proposed water supply and sanitation systems and the ability of these systems to prevent disease, contamination, and unsanitary conditions. d. The susceptibility of the proposed facility and its contents to flood damage and the effect of such damage on the individual owner. e. The importance of the services provided by the proposed facility to the community. f. The requirements of the facility for a waterfront location. g. The availability of alternative locations not subject to flooding for the proposed use. h. The compatibility of the proposed use with existing development and development anticipated in the foreseeable future. i. The relationship of the proposed use to the comprehensive plan and flood plain management program for the area. j. The safety of access to the property in times of flood for ordinary and emergency vehicles. k. The expected heights, velocity, duration, rate of rise, and sediment transport of the flood waters expected at the site. 1. Such other factors which are relevant to the purposes of this Subsection. 6. Conditions Attached to Conditional Use Permits. Upon consideration of the factors listed above and the purpose of this Subsection 850.2 1, the City Council shall attach such conditions to the granting of conditional use permits as it deems Ordinance No. 2004 -11 Page 19 necessary to fulfill the purposes of this Subsection 850.21. Such conditions may include, but are not limited to, the following: a. Modification of waste treatment and water supply facilities. b. Limitations on period of use, occupancy, and operation. c. Imposition of operational controls, sureties, and deed restrictions. d. Requirements for construction of channel modifications, compensatory storage, dikes, levees, and other protective measures. e. Flood proofing measures, in accordance with the Building Code and this Subsection. The applicant shall submit a plan or document certified by a registered professional engineer or architect that the flood proofing measures are consistent with the regulatory flood protection elevation and associated flood factors for the particular area. Subd. 12. Nonconforming Uses. A. A structure or the use of a structure or premises which was lawful before the passage or amendment of this Subsection but which is not in conformity with the provisions of this Subsection may be continued subject to the following conditions. Historic structures, as defined in Subd. 2 of this Subsection 850.21 shall be subject to the provisions of subparagraphs 1. — 5. of paragraph A. of Subd. 12 of this Subsection 850.21. 1. No such use shall be expanded, changed, enlarged, or altered in a way that increases its nonconformity. 2. Any structural alteration or addition to a nonconforming structure or nonconforming use which would result in increasing the flood damage potential of that structure or use shall be protected to the Regulatory Flood Protection Elevation in accordance with any of the elevation on fill or flood proofing techniques (i.e., FP- 1 thru FP4 floodproofing classifications) allowable in the Building Code, except as further restricted in subparagraphs 3. — 6. below. 3. The cost of any structural alterations or additions to any nonconforming structure over the life of the structure shall not exceed 50 percent of the market value of the structure unless the conditions of this Section are satisfied. The cost of all structural alterations and additions constructed since the adoption of the Community's initial flood plain controls must be calculated into today's current cost which will include all costs such as construction materials and a reasonable cost placed on all manpower or labor. If the current cost of all previous and proposed alterations and additions exceeds 50 percent of the current market value of the structure, then the structure must meet the standards of Subd. 5 and 6 of this Subsection for new structures depending upon whether the structure is in the Floodway or Flood Fringe District, respectively. 4. If any nonconforming use is discontinued for 12 consecutive months, any future use of the building premises shall conform to this Subsection. The Assessor shall notify the Planner in writing if aware of instances of nonconforming uses that have been discontinued for a period of 12 months. Ordinance No. 2004 -11 Page 20. 5. If this is substantial damage to any nonconforming use or structure, it shall not be reconstructed except in conformity with the provisions of this Subsection 850.21. The applicable provisions for establishing new uses or new structures in Subd. 5, 6 and 7 of this Subsection 850.21 will apply depending upon whether the use or structure is in the Floodway District, Flood Fringe District or General Flood Plain District, respectively. 6. If a substantial improvement occurs from any combination of a building addition to the outside dimensions of the existing building or a rehabilitation, reconstruction, alteration, or other improvement to the inside dimensions of an existing nonconforming building, then the building addition (as required by subparagraph 2 above) and the existing nonconforming building must meet the requirements of Subd. 5 and 6 of this Subsection 850.21 for new structures, depending upon whether the structure is in the Floodway or Flood Fringe District, respectively. Subd. 13 Penalties For Violation A. The provisions, penalties and remedies set out in Subsection 850.04 shall apply to any violation of the provisions of this Subsection 850.21. B. Nothing herein contained shall prevent the City from taldng such other lawful action as is necessary to prevent or remedy any violation. Such actions may include but are not limited to: 1. In responding to a suspected violation of this Subsection 850.21, the Planner and City may utilize the full array of enforcement actions available to it including but not limited to prosecution and fines, injunctions, after -the -fact permits, orders for corrective measures or a request to the National Flood Insurance Program for denial of flood insurance availability to the guilty party. The City must act in good faith to enforce these official controls and to correct violations of this Subsection 850.21 to the extent possible so as not to jeopardize its eligibility in the National Flood Insurance Program. 2. When a violation of this Subsection 850.21 is either discovered by or brought to the attention of the Planner, the Planner shall immediately investigate the situation and document the nature and extent of the violation of the official control. As soon as is reasonably possible, this information will be submitted to the appropriate Department of Natural Resources' and Federal Emergency Management Agency Regional Office along with the City's plan of action to correct the violation to the degree possible. 3. The Planner shall notify the suspected party of the requirements of this Subsection 850.21 and all other official controls and the nature and extent of the suspected violation of these controls. If the structure and/or use is under construction or development, the Planner may order the construction or development immediately halted until a proper permit or approval is granted by the City. If the construction or development is already completed, then the Planner may either: (1) issue an order identifying the corrective actions that must be made within a specified time period to bring the use or structure into compliance with the official controls; or (2) notify the responsible party to apply for an after -the -fact permit/development approval within a specified period of time not to exceed 30 -days. Ordinance No. 2004 -11 Page 21 4. If the responsible party does not appropriately respond to the Planner within the specified period of time, each additional day that lapses shall constitute an additional violation of this Subsection and shall be prosecuted accordingly. The Planner shall . also upon the lapse of the specified response period notify the landowner to restore the land to the condition which existed prior to the violation of this Subsection. Subd.14 AMENDMENTS A. The flood plain designation on the Map shall not be removed from flood plain areas unless it can be shown that the designation is in error or that the area has been filled to or above the elevation of the regulatory flood protection elevation and is contiguous to lands outside the flood plain. Special exceptions to this rule may be permitted by the Commissioner of Natural Resources if he determines that, through other measures, lands are adequately protected for the intended use. B. All amendments to this Subsection, including amendments to the Map, must be submitted to and approved by the Commissioner of Natural Resources prior to adoption. Changes in the Map must meet the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Technical Conditions and Criteria and must receive prior FEMA approval before adoption. The Commissioner of Natural Resources must be given 10 -days written notice of all hearings to consider an amendment to this Subsection and said notice shall include a draft of the amendment to this Subsection 850.21 or technical study under consideration. Section 2. EFFECTIVE DATE: This Subsection shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval and publication, as required by law. First Reading: Second Reading: Publication: Attest Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Dennis F. Maetzold , Mayor A, ow e ,666 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION TO: Mayor and Council From: Craig Larsen City Planner ° Date: August 17, 2004 Subject: Preliminary Rezoning and Plat 5125 49 Street W. Mark Jones RECOMMENDATION: Agenda Item # III. C. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ❑ Motion ° ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion The Planning Commission recommends Preliminary Rezoning, R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to PRD -3, Planned Residence District, and Preliminary Plat approval for a 5- unit townhouse development conditioned on: 1. Final Rezoning 2. Final Plat 3. Developer's Agreement 4. Watershed District Permit 5. Vacation .of Pukwana right -of -way 6. Provision of guest parking o INFO /BACKGROUND: See attached Planning Commission minutes, staff report and plans. Residents attending the planning Commission meeting raised the issue of guest parking and on- street parking. Currently, parking is allowed only on the south side of West 49th Street. See attached history and recommendation of the Director of Public Works. Also attached is a revised site plan illustrating on -site guest parking for the proposed development. 6 LOCA1 SON MAP W 0 Co Y O O Ir m EDIN 48TH ST W 48TH ST W vvwl m y W 3 s' C-2 Lby0 �O Subject Site C D GRANGE RD O N Ln O LU �O Edina Overview Z -04 -1 PRELIMINARY REZONING PUKWANA TOWNHOMES LLC 5125 49TH STREET WEST TF 7J7 >x Subject Site] vow r" ' ' i ova Dn z �r i :�. a i rid`• >. max.. �' r4 ,• a �► '.. � ' .tai 7r v N 1 '+w ate• � �iE � y� . _ m, r 1J � a ii Subject Site] vow r" ' ' i ova k i :�. ,• 1 '+w ate• � �iE � e� .... . Subject Site] vow r" ' ' i ova Case File Z -04 -1 and S -04-4 Location: 5125 West 49th Street Applicant: Mark Jones 4805 School Road Edina, MN Owner: Thea Lucy Marshall 5125 West 49 h Street Edina, MN Zoning: R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District Comprehensive Plan: Low Density Attached Residential Regular Meeting of the Edina Planning Commission Wednesday, July 8, 2004, 7:00 AM Edina City Hall Council Chambers 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, MN Request: Rezone property from R -1 to PRD -3 to allow redevelopment of property with five (5) townhouse units. The request also includes vacation of Pukwana Lane to the immediate west of this property. A five -unit townhouse plat is part of the proposal. Site Context: To the east are two 4 -unit buildings that are zoned PRD -2. Further to the east and on the north side of 49th Street are single dwelling lots. Singled Dwelling homes front the north side of the street. Pukwana is an unimproved street that serves only the subject property. There is an existing dwelling located near Vernon Avenue on the southerly portion of the site. Explanation of request: The proposed development would combine 2 platted lots with vacated Pukwana right -of -way to create a tract with an area of 18,982 square feet. The proposal is to raze the existing dwelling and construct one, 5 unit townhouse building. Each unit would have a ground level garage with two living levels above. There are 2 unit types, one at 1,550 square feet and the other at 1,650 square feet. PRD -3 Zoning Compliance: Densi : The base square footage per unit is 4,400 square feet. Enclosed parking reduces the required square footage to 3,400 per unit. The proposed development complies with density requirements of the PRD -3 district. Building Coverage: A maximum Lot coverage of 30% is allowed. The proposed building footprint of 4,568 square feet covers 24% of the site. Building Setbacks: The proposed site plan complies with PRD -3 building setback requirements. Required setbacks are 35 feet front and rear, and 20 for interior side yards. Parkina: The PRD -3 district requires 2 enclosed spaces per unit as provided in the proposed plan. The ordinance does not contain specific requirements for guest parking. Street vacation: Pukwana Lane is an unimproved road serving only this property. The right of way is 25 feet wide and runs the entire length of the subject property. The property has frontage and utility access on West 49th Street. See attached Memo from the Director of Public Works recommending vacation. Land use and Zoning Analysis: The proposed development with townhomes is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, which designates the site as suitable for low density attached residential. The PRD -3 District provides for low to medium density development. The required lot area per unit ranges from 2,900 to 4,400 square feet. The two properties to the immediate east are zoned PRD -2, but are developed at a density more compatible with a PRD -3 zoning. PRD -2 requires 7,300 square feet of lot area per unit. The two properties provide 5,600 and 4,700 square feet respectively. At five units the proposal provides approximately 4,150 square feet per unit. If one unit is eliminated the lot area per unit increases to 4,750 square feet. The five unit plan proposed does not require any variances. Recommendation: The proposed use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and represents an appropriate use of the property. The proposal requires no variances. However, at five units the proposal is too dense relative to neighboring properties and the low density Comprehensive Plan designation. Staff recommends Preliminary Rezoning to PRD -3, and Preliminary Plat approval subject to: 1. Final Rezoning 2. Final Plat 3. Elimination of one unit 4. Vacation of Pukwana Lane 5. Watershed District permits 6. Developers Agreement 7. Provisions of two guest parking spaces DRAFT MINUTES OF THE PC MEETING OF JULY 28, 2004 Z-04 -1 & S-04 -4 Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Plat Mark Jones 5125 49th Street West Mr. Larsen informed the Commission the proponent is requesting a rezoning and replat of the subject property from R -1 to PRD -3 to allow the redevelopment of the property with five (5) townhouse units. Mr. Larsen reported the proposed redevelopment with townhomes is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, which designates the site as suitable for low density residential. The proposal also requires no variances. However, at five units the proposal is too dense relative to the neighboring properties. Concluding, Mr. Larsen said staff recommends preliminary rezoning and preliminary plat subject to: final rezoning, final plat, elimination of one unit, vacation of Pukwana Lane, Watershed District permits, Developers Agreement and provision of two guest parking spaces. The proponent, Mr. Mark Jones was present along with his architect Mr. Jim McNeal. Commissioner Swenson commented in reviewing the proposed plans she observed the railroad right of way appears overly generous, questioning if her observation is correct. Mr. Larsen responded that observation is correct. With graphics he pointed out the difference in RR right -of -way between the subject site and the residential property across the street. Commissioner Fischer asked Mr. Larsen the reasoning behind his recommendation to reduce the proposed 5 -unit development to a 4 -unit development. Mr. Larsen explained the proposal requires a rezoning; it is presently zoned R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District and adding a 4 -unit townhouse is comparable in density with the two apartment buildings directly east of the subject site. Mr. Larsen concluded staff based its recommendation on density. Mr. Jones said in his opinion a 5 -unit development suits the site, adding the topography lends itself well to this project. He pointed out each unit is constructed with a 2 -stall tuck under garage with additional parking provided on the individual driveway. Chair Byron questioned with regard to parking the number of surface parking spaces the site actually provides. Mr. Jones responded he believes the site provides at minimum 10 spaces with the potential to achieve 15 spaces. Commissioner Swenson asked if that number includes parking in front of the garages. Mr. Jones responded in the affirmative. Mr. McNeal with graphics pointed out the proposed tuck under garages are recessed which increases surface parking space on the driveways. Commissioner Swenson said as she views the proposal she observed the topography changes and questioned how the grade change is handled. Mr. McNeal told the Commission the architectural elements of the proposal are still in the preliminary stages but it is believed the best way to develop this lot is to orient the garages east, with the 'front" facing west with each unit in a sense "stepping up ". Mr. McNeal said their goal is to keep the project as level as possible. Chair Byron asked the reasoning behind orienting the proposed townhomes as designed. Mr. McNeal said orienting the garages east lines them up with the garages of the existing apartment building. This aligns driveway -to- driveway garages to garages. Continuing, Mr. McNeal said he also believes this design plan best suits the site and neighborhood. Chair Byron noted the 'front" or more appealing side would face the railroad tracks. Mr. McNeal responded in the affirmative. Commissioner McClelland noted it appears the garages are recessed and questioned if from the garage wall to the east property line there is roughly around 27 feet. Mr. Larsen responded that figure is probably correct. He said it appears to him there is 23 feet from the easterly property line to the closest point on the east elevation of the building and with the garages being recessed 27 feet is a good estimate. Commissioner McClelland commented that distance provides at least 2 parking spaces in front of each unit adding she would like to see more guest parking provided if possible. Mr. Heather Tielz, 5108 49th Street West, told the Commission her concern is with parkinp. She pointed out that presently there is no parking on the north side of West 49 Street, adding the only street or "guest parking" is on the south side in front of the existing apartment buildings. Parking in this area is scarce. Continuing, Ms. Tielz also pointed out the subject site is directly adjacent to the only access and exit point in our neighborhood. She explained the West 49th Street entrance /exit serves all properties in this isolated area. Concluding, Ms. Tielz asked if many of the trees would be removed Mr. McNeal responded the intent is to preserve as many trees as possible. He pointed out the majority of large trees are actually located on the railroad right of way. Chair Byron asked Mr. Larsen if he knows the reason for the parking prohibition on the north side of West 49th Street. Mr. Larsen responded at this time he doesn't know the specifics but believes the restriction may have something to do with the width of the street. A street must maintain a certain width in order for emergency vehicles to have safe passage through an area. Mrs. Leslie Losey, 5105 49th Street West, told the Commission her concern is also with parking and congestion. She explained she resides in the house directly east of the two apartment buildings and directly in front of her house is a Stop sign, and sharp curve. She added if she has guests they have to park in front of the apartment buildings where parking is already stressed and this proposal would only add more congestion. Chair Byron commented it appears adequate on street parking is of great importance to immediate residents noting the proposal before the Commission this evening appears to meet code with additional parking (for guests) possibility occurring on the public street. Commissioner Workinger agreed parking is of concern and suggested that the proponent eliminate one of the curb cuts which if removed would provide more on street parking. Mr. Jones responded one curb cut could be eliminated; adding in his opinion the site has room to provide more parking. Mr. Jones also mentioned the possibility of petitioning the railroad for a portion of their easement to add to the subject site. Commissioner McClelland said she agreed with the observation made by Mr. Jones with regard to additional parking area and pointed out on the plat it appears to her more parking spaces could be achieved in the northeast corner of the site. Commissioner Swenson asked why this proposal is requesting a PRD -3 zoning and not PRD -2. Mr. Larsen explained when the buildings to the east were constructed the City did not have a PRD zoning classification. Presently the apartment buildings to the east are zoned PRD -2 but meet the requirements of the PRD -3 zoning district. Mr. Larsen said to staff it made sense to zone the site according to code. Commissioner Swenson asked Mr. Larsen if 4 vs. 5 units meet code requirements. Mr. Larsen responded in the affirmative, either 4 or 5 units meet code. Commissioner Fischer stated as he visited the subject site he observed many of the single dwelling homes in the neighborhood have one -stall garages with additional parking occurring on the driveway (similar to the proposed situation). The proposal before the Commission this evening provides two garage stalls per unit along with parking on each driveway and the potential for additional parking spaces on site. Commissioner Fischer said he believes the potential property owners of the townhomes may also take advantage of the public transportation system offered in close proximity to the townhomes thereby reducing the parking impact. Commissioner Fischer suggested to the proponent that adding steps from the townhouse site to the bus stop area on Vernon Avenue a good idea. Continuing, Commissioner Fischer said when he reviewed the plans and visited the site, in his opinion, the proposal before the Commission this evening is a perfect fit. He pointed out this proposal offers a zoning buffer to the R -1 single family homes while providing housing within close proximity to a busy street with public transportation options. Concluding, Commissioner Fischer reiterated in his opinion this is a good reuse of the site. Railroad tracks to the west, apartment buildings to the east and a very busy street to the south border the site. Commissioner Fischer stated the proposed townhouse development works with the site, adding he can support the requested 5 unit building. Commissioner McClelland asked Mr. Jones if he has settled on a price for the proposed new townhomes. Mr. Jones said the price he is considering is in the low 400 thousand dollar range. Commissioner Workinger asked Mr. Larsen why he believes the proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Larsen responded in the Comprehensive Plan this property is recommended as low density residential. The reason for that designation is because this property is a classic example of using multi - family residential as a transitional tool. Mr. Larsen pointed out its close proximity not only to Vernon Avenue but also to the Highway 100 ramps and railroad tracks lend itself well to multi - family. Mr. Larsen added the existing house on this lot predates everything in the neighborhood. Ms. Tielz told the Commission the existing apartments and the subject property did not participate in the sound wall assessment and she would like assurances a fence will remain along the rear of the subject property. Mr. Jones responded there is a fence along Vernon Avenue, and it or another would remain, adding it is possible a gate could be cut into the fence to allow the residents of the townhouses direct access to Vernon. Avenue. Ms. Tielz questioned the type of fence that will run along the property line. Mr. Jones said at this time he has not taken that up with the County /State. He said he believes a new fence will be erected along with the sound wall, but is unsure of what type of fence it will be, or if the County will retain the existing fence. Chair Byron informed Ms. Tielz that at this time the Commission cannot comment on the type of fence that may be erected, or if the existing fence would remain. He noted the proponent has indicated a fence will run along that property line, but doesn't know precisely what type. Commissioner Workinger said he would be impressed if the developer could safely direct residents from the subject site to the sidewalk on Vernon Avenue. Mr. Jones reiterated he would look into the possibility of adding a "gate" and maybe "stepping stones" where residents could walk directly to the sidewalk along Vernon Avenue. Chair Byron asked Mr. Larsen if the proponents amend the plan to include more guest parking spaces would staff like to take this opportunity to indicate where additional parking should be located. Mr. Larsen said at this time staff would like to see that open ended allowing the proponent the opportunity to study the site to maximize parking. Mr. McNeal said in quickly reviewing the site he believes there is additional area to locate more guest parking to the north. Mr. McNeal said more parking area could also be accomplished if the proposed townhouses were moved closer to the westerly property line. He said that was not considered because that would create a variance situation from the western lot line. Commissioner Lonsbury questioned if the Commission should entertain the idea of granting a building setback variance from the westerly property line in order to provide more parking area to the east. Mr. Larsen responded while that is a possibility it would create a technical problem. At present this plan meets code and staff encourages compliance if compliance can be met. Mr. Larsen also pointed out as mentioned by Mr. Jones there is a possibility of requesting railroad right of way vacation, which in turn could provide more parking. Commissioner Fischer moved to recommend preliminary rezoning and preliminary plat approval subject to; final rezoning and final plat approval, vacation of Pukwana Lane, Watershed District permits, Developers Agreement; and redesign of curb cut(s) /guest parking area to maximize guest parking on the subject site. Commissioner Lonsbury seconded the motion. Ayes; Fischer, Swenson, Lonsbury, McClelland, Runyan, Workinger. Nay; Byron. Chair Byron explained he supports staff in their recommendation of a 4 -unit development. Commissioner Workinger commented it would be beneficial if each unit would provide three guest parking spaces, two in front of each garage and one additional space per unit somewhere on site. -it'. qw, 1:4 VI n'4. 'I MO A;W.. 001 'A' "i WCL NN •1 -1 sy . . . . . . . . . . . . . m 15'. x c Y kry .-Trit j�vvlg L P;71 5F Im r.'p 'w"Ji4. P, 3 Tisi atbAt-F- bac,5- bavents Ao. •.7 1� lF. trr pq_cp te, • "j, e rs I OW il�* pal: W... A �V !V1 41Z Gr A lb vo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.1 i-T IF v, -T: f I Tk A r"_ 'Aw: tv •• k. Al W, 40 I si* 01 AW. ^:4';iC' •`�.•S!''�' 1C:�• -'t;' L, j :�.: .r: '{ !b4' H.y ,i• • 'C. - _m wo:. at. Cn Nom,? o v� fryrnR�e DATE: August 11, 2004 TO: Craig Larsen — City Planner FROM: Wayne Houle — City Engineer MEMORANDUM CITY OF EDINA SUBJECT: "No Parking" Signs on West 49th Street between Westbrook Lane & Brookside Avenue Engineering has reviewed the above "No Parking" signs. West 49th Street is the only access into this neighborhood and is a 30 -foot wide roadway; this provides ample room for two -way traffic and parking on one side of the roadway. No parking restrictions currently exist on the northerly side of the roadway. These signs were installed prior to 1972 since our records reflect the following: ■ 12/13/72 — Request to remove the "No Parking" signs along West 49th Street. o Committee recommended denial until other traffic improvements in area accomplished. ■ 12/13/77 — Request to remove "No Parking" signs at 5115 -5121 West 49th Street o Committee recommended approval of removal. ■ 10/14/86 —Request for "No Parking" signs at 5105 West 49th Street. o Committee recommended approval of installation. Engineering recommends that "No Parking" restrictions remain on this portion of West 49th Street. A. e t4 MEMORANDUM — Plan Review` �, ay ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDINA DATE: July 23, 2004 TO: Craig Larsen ,,� FROM: Wayne Houle ` ,ill SUBJECT: Proposed Pukwana Townhomes West 49th Street Engineering has reviewed the above stated project and offer the following comments: • We do not object to the vacation of Pukwana Lane. This development will eliminate the one home that Pukwana Lane currently serves. The vacation of Pukwana Lane will require a separate Public Hearing; the developer has applied for this vacation. The City does not have any City owned utilities within this right -of- way; other utility companies will be contacted prior to the Public Hearing. • The proposed easterly entrance to this property will be required to maintain a minimum of 5 feet from the east property line at the West 49th Street right -of -way. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this first review. Thanks Mr. Marls Jones 7 -27 -04 J am pleased to see what you are planning for the 5125 w 496 street, l believe the new development will be a great addition to our neighborhood. The improvement to the existing property with your proposed plan should help our property values as well, which is always welcomed. Good luck 1 W. BROWN LAND SURVEYING, INC. 8030 Cedar Avenue South Suit6 228 WOODROW A. BROWN, R.L.S. Bloomin ton, MN 55425 Survey For: 0952) President Phone 854 -4055 NORTH Fax (952) 854 -4268 Mark Jones ce Scale: 1 " =30' X 924.5 &� X 921.7 RY1 Takm=8191.4 Top -922.e Inv -910.8 NOTE: No Search Was `0 Made For Any 9250 - 924.5 Easements. EST 49TH STS 9C STRE LAC Inv -919.7 923.8 X 923.0 �r ,yt I.- f 925.9TC 8 ?r C 9 sti 50.00 mess. 921.2X .7 v 8 - + x 92 6 x 921.2 I 9 924.1 I 191.0 x 923.8 h0 1925.4 X92.2%923.4 9�'k I X 8226 LOT 27.8 ryas _ X 924.0 1 r-\ T I w x 922.8 L 9'159 2 Q N `to q'L 924.4 �'r924 X 924.2 �] wall i g2g � q 4)28.0 8�B•� I ea t2 7 Z 0 dra z 51 + + `,P X'B2 ?f I Y 09 ° x 924.8 C14 4 t0 9� X925.6 N 0 CID a X 931.0. N CID I 926.0 928.71W `pva � . w 92 � x 927J, 2e.1 1 bpp�77yy��)) 34.4r# Retaining Waft 92 .8 . J 0) .1 (b x 930.5 8J647W 9 } " I LOT + X 8 0yry 5 x 938.2 Sill � +�6_.0 13.8 IL U T 9 9 Areas: Lots 7 & 8 e 12,416.27;k Sq. Ft. I Pukarana . 6,5115.41 Sq. R 927.5 BExOdnq v 1� co 943. t0 wsd N ++ X 9: Rar 1 ,g 'pe s 941.1 12_5 x) / / BENCHIMRKS:I e.5 n p % 8 ia #62 Top Nut Hydrant SE Cor. I X 943. I m \'� VV o 76- Hankarson Ave. & Interlaehan Blvd. 944.7 Elevation .982.65 I 51 $1 E Overhead Electric Top Nut Hydrant SW Car. Vs.= Ave. & Intarlachen Blvd. 8 8k 'f 946.9 Storm Sewer Elsvatlan - 962.65 9,��' }� 4- ?� r\ / /r� Cep -SAN- � Sanitary Seller #602 Top Nut Hydrant NW Car. ? 949.5 Power Pole 8rookslde Are. & Rutledge Blvd. / O Manhole Elavatlon - 962.65 m m„ �- 924 -- Existing Contour ® Square Catchtwein rn o, x x 931.52TW Top Wall a x 931.52 Existing Spot Elevation 937.85TC Top PROPERTY DESCRIPTION x of Curb Spot Elevation Lots 7 and 8, Block 4, TINGDALE BROS. BROOKSIDE. Hennepin County, Minnesota. I hereby certify that this survey,-.plan or report was prepared by me or under my. direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. W. BROW& LAND SURVEYING, INC. Ddted: July 13, 2004 129 -04 Woodrow A. Brown, R.LS NO. 1583 91/31 . 1 of 1 For ag n Arc itect TEL 612.332.4790 FAX 612.343.4609 SUITE 447 275 MARKET STREET Minneapolis, Minnesota 55405 2 0 0 4 PUKWANA TOWNHOMES COPYRIGHT p 2004 iNESEi D=OdEM ARE 967RUMDM OF SERV= PROIEM BY Us COPAEGIR' Lm An Fmm 7NE PROPFRIY OF 7NE ARCRRECL PUBM OR USE 7NEY M&Y WM 7!E ARUIUIECM WMrrM APPROVAL. 7EE MW AID 7NESE DRARM ARE 70 BE USED FOR MN PRO= AND SEIE. UNMRNOFUM USE OR REPRODUCRDN OF IM DESIGN, DUALS OR PLAN AND SPFLGICODN 6 Paomm D. ISSUE DATES: N0. DATE DESCRIPTION I 815/"l CmaL sUML CONN. NO.: DRAWN BY: CHECK BY. 40 N0. HMI DAY 5MT04 Fitp f-EtzT7 a © 200, wo 1ewM M /Ip(1[LT. R6par am M Rftp MNOWC M a ouwm we � � a .gym FO AI' TEL 812.892.4790 FAX 812.349.4809 8tI 1teC SWE 447 275 MARKET S M MlnneapoUs, Minnesota 55405 `Z U U 4 PUSIIANA TOIINHOMES EDINA. MINNESOTA DEVEIAPER: MARE A. JONES a © 200, wo 1ewM M /Ip(1[LT. R6par am M Rftp MNOWC M a ouwm we � � a .gym 1Ll u��A C R �i`= C�a �_� ®i 4 eE Il U fl II �l�l �1 if Ae t III °ii' _li�j „� I LIE; V :: — �- n �) aye �1 �A� �r ! k��, .. gym. C❑ LI la Gc'7 vfr ',�L k� I� pri 1 c �^ �; ;� �.■ �® 'Ir ; ��L i�� LI n i� ~� 1� �� �i Fi ,� 4Fy-+- �__� P- I ■■I r �+ _�.� 1� �• � F��,.� -a fi 1J 1-� EJ� .� •� JU F �, -�► .�� .�.�L;�''�=� `�ci ,vial``—���y� � ��, coprlmff 2W4 �O 8 *p gfll7�g 447 PUIt1IANA TOWMOMES U 275 YARM MUM nINA. 1QNN WA ' mrnnv u� wo io�r ni Minneapolis. AT itec DsvEroPr�: �� A. lONBS Minnesota 65405 TEL 612.992.4790 2 0 0 4 FAX 812.949.4809 s ?fir.; _ cs•.� � k,.ys »tilt/ I low- FO "!e! OM 447 FUKWANA TO11NHOKES mw 275 MAM7 SfUff �n e SDIIiA. MINNS807'A � �,.,. ,. ■o ion. nc A Minneapolis. 08YSLOFBB: MARK A. tuxes 1O°"• ° "` O"�' "••� Minnesota 55405 TEL 812.332.4790 2 0 0 4 FAX 512.343.4809 r' COPMW FO 8Y SUrr6 447 PUKWANA TOWNHOMES BDQiA, MINNESOTA ' a.u+aNima+m.rua v. No �rN M 276 YAR6Sf STREBT DEVBLOPEE: MASS A. JONES esnoQ IV Wr O M MON61. NOW Ar itec �P°Us• +o Yinnm to 55405 am No ns s,.° a an no Im TEL 812.992.4790 FAX 812.943.4809 2 0 0 4 1 .. FO OU Sarre K 7 PUHIIANA TOWNH0MES p m°` + aIQ �•Ilpl� w E75 MABSSf STREET EDINA. MINNESOTA cello.u.wol m AZ' itec Mlnne.poue. DEVELOPER MAae A JONES °up1 °NO aMLY Wmm Im man Minnesota 55405 a a.m.: vP ■� =� TEL 612.992.4790 2 U U ¢ ° 0cm :°'" FAX 612.949.4509 08/14/04 05 :25 2 6123781674 PATRICK CHARLES KELLIS ATTORNEY A'1' l .AW August 14, 2004 City of Edina Planning Department 4801 West 50h Street Nina, MN 55424 R :: August 171h, 2004 City C OUTaeil Meeting, Property Address: 5125 49'r' Struct Wv *t Purpose: 3-Unit 'Townhouse: Development FAlinaa City Planning: ProfileCenter P.01 Prolile Genler @ 7KYO 11nlvatsilyAve..Sfi • Mirmeapolls. MN 55414 Voicr: 612.3%N.22UU • I•gtr: GI :!%11.16%4 Mobllo: GM.309 6551 •1•anaU: pholllvOlx:khm-CO --F)1 Via FaC411111C Only 952.826.0389 Page I of 1 1 am representing Mr. Jerry O'Brien in this matter. Mr. O'Brien is the property owner of the two apartment buildings (5119-5123 49 "' Street West) adjacent to ihc. :above - referenced property. Mr. O'Brien is in 111vor of 1110 proposed 5 -Unit Townhouse Dovuloptnew contingent on: 1) '!'110 retaining wall oil the properly line separating Mr. O'1 ;ricii's property and Mr. Jones' property be maintained by the proposed devcluprnunt; and 2) Reioning of the new development would help Mr. O'Briun if he chooses to rezone his property liar a similar use as is proposed by Mr. Jones. The rationale being that Mr. Jones' development will most likely lower the (airrent value of Mr. O'Brien's property as an apartment complex; however, it has the potential o1' increasing the worth of Mr. O' Brien's property as a new townhouse development. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions regarding this IGrtur. 'Thank .you. Respectfully, r� Patrick C. Kellis PCK/kak cc: Jerry O'Brien AT�w� M, C. August 13, 2004 Re: Case file Z -04 -1 and S -04 -4 5 -Unit Townhouse Development plans at 5125 49h Street West To the members of Edina City Council: I live on the corner of Rutledge and Brookside Avenues; I can see the property under consideration from my kitchen window. I strongly oppose the rezoning of this property to a 5 -unit townhouse development. A townhouse development will lower the surrounding property value as single family homebuyers are typically not as attracted to areas with multi - family living. As the property values drop, so does the quality of living and of course, city tax revenues. In addition, townhouses would not fit the character of the neighborhood. Most of the homes in this neighborhood are single - family homes from the 1940 -1960s -- a large block of townhouses would not fit this period and would be unsightly to our community. There currently is a line of vegetation along one side of the property in question. Were this to be removed as part of the construction of the townhouses, Vernon Avenue and the Highway 100 off ramp would be visible from my property. This would significantly lower my property value and reduce my quality of living due to traffic noise. With regard to safety, 5 more families living-in this neighborhood will only increase the traffic flow, which will make it more dangerous for pedestrians and other traffic in the area. I believe Interlachen and Brookside are dangerous as they are; we should not be adding more traffic to the area if we can help it. I currently work in the southeast suburbs and see plenty of townhouses; I consider them unattractive and had I wanted to live amongst them, I would have not moved into Edina. I certainly do not want to see them every time I look out of my window. Respectfully, Karl Henkelmann 4840 Rutledge Ave 0 M ,r�l, oe l. REPORURECOMMENDATION TO: Mayor & Council Members FROM: Melvin Ogurak Edina Human Relations Commission DATE: August 17, 2004 SUBJECT: AMENDMENT OF SECTION 140 OF THE EDINA CITY CODE Agenda Item IV.. A. ❑ Consent ❑ Information Only" ❑ Mgr. Recommends To HRA 0 To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution 0 Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Approve the name change of the "Edina Human Relations Commission" to the "Edina Human Rights and Relations Commission." Background: The Commission was formed in 1970 as the "Edina Human Rights Commission." In 1973, the name was changed to the "Edina Human Relations Commission," apparently to conform to a sample set of by -laws provided by the State. Today, virtually all communities surrounding Edina and others throughout the State have adopted the "Human Rights Commission" name. Furthermore, the "Edina Human Relations Commission" is a dues - paying and voting member of the League of Minnesota Human Rights Commissions. The words "Human Rights" and "Human Relations" convey two different mind -sets. The majority of the Commissioners on March 23, 2004, voted °that the name of the Commission be changed to the "Edina Human Rights and Relations Commission" to accurately reflect the Commission's mission and beliefs —see submitted materials —and to better convey to the community that their Commission stands for those protected rights that are enumerated in the Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 363A, et seq., and the Commission's newly adopted bylaws —a copy of which is attached hereto. f ORDINANCE NO. 200412 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SUBSECTION 140 RENAMING THE EDINA HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION The City Council of the City of Edina ordains: Section 1. Subsection 140.02 is hereby amended to read as follows: "140.01 Establishment. To further accomplishment of the above policies, the Human Rights and Relations Commission (the Commission) is hereby established." Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect after its adoption and publication according to law. First Reading: Second Reading: Publication: Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Dennis F. Maetzold, Mayor August 17, 2004 Dear Council Members: In support of the Commission name change the following documents are submitted: 1. On Tuesday, March 23, 2004, the minutes of the Edina ' Human Relations Commission reflect that the motion to change the name of the commission to "Edina Human Rights and Relations Commission," was seconded and passed by a majority of the members. See Exhibit A, Page 2. 2. Gordon Hughes, in a memorandum to Susan Heiberg dated October 28, 2003, states "...that the City Council would need to act on a name change by amending Section 140 of the City Code..." See Exhibit B, Page 1. 3. Mr. Hughes in that same memorandum provides the historical background with supporting documents regarding the renaming of the Commission from "The Local Human Rights Commission" to "The Edina Human Relations Commission." See Exhibit B, Pages 1 -9. 4. Ordinance No. 104 established a "Local Human Rights Commission." (Emphasis added.) See Exhibit B, Page 3. 5. Ordinance No. 104, Section 2, is titled "Establishment and Purpose of Human Rights Commission." (Emphasis added.) See Exhibit B, Page 3. 6. The language of Ordinance No. 104, Section 2, following its title, states in contradictory terms as follows: "The Edina Human Relations Commission is hereby established..." (Emphasis added.) See Exhibit B, Page 3. 7. Ordinance No. 104, Section 2, in its body speaks of human rights "...in securing for all individuals of the community, freedom from discrimination because of race, color, creed, religion, or national origin in connection with employment, housing and real property, public accommodations, public services, and education, ...and all other functions assigned to local human rights commissions by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 363, as amended." (Emphasis added.) See Exhibit B, Page 3. 8. Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 363, the enabling statute for the formation of local human rights commissions is titled "HUMAN RIGHTS," and a May 15,1968 opinion by the Attorney General states that M. S. Section 363.12, subd. 1, impliedly grants authority to establish local human rights commissions. See Exhibit C. 9. Ordinance No. 106, Sec. 2, repealed Ordinance No. 104, and officially renamed the Commission as the "Edina Human Relations Commission." See Exhibit B, page 8. 10. Ordinance No. 106, Section 1, (3) states as follows: "Cooperate with the State of Minnesota Department of Human Rights, the Minnesota League of Human Rights Commissions and other agencies in their programs of human rights." (Emphasis added.) See Exhibit B, Page 8. 11. Section 140 of the Edina City Code replaced Ordinance No. 106. See Exhibit D, Pages 1 -2. 12. The Mission statement of the Edina Human Relations Commission states in part that it "...is to advocate for basic human rights and needs in our community..." (Emphasis added.) See Exhibit E. 13. The Edina Human Relations Commission is a member of the League of Minnesota Human Rights Commissions and has received from the League literature encouraging working relationships between schools and Human Rights Commissions. (Emphasis added.) See Exhibits F, Pages 1-4. 14. Of interest is that the City of Golden Valley has a Human Rights Commission and the City of St. Louis Park not only has a Human Rights Commission, but it has a "Human Rights Phone Line." See Exhibits G & H. The citizens of the City of Edina deserve to have a commission named the "Edina Human Rights and Relations Commission" to establish a forum to educate people in respecting diversity and to provide a remedy, in accordance with state statutes, for those whose human rights have been violated. See Exhibit 1, Pages 1 -2. Enc. Respectfully submitted, 41A4'r2���� Edina Human Relations Commission T. } BYLAWS EDINA HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION Office • The principal office of the Commission shall be at the Edina City Hall in the City of Edina, County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota. • The members of the Commission may designate, for administrative convenience, the legal address of the Edina City Hall for receipt and transmittal of Commission communications. Purposes of Commission • The Commission is established for the purpose of aiding and advising the Council of the City of Edina and the School Board of Independent School District No. 273 in securing for all of the residents of the community freedom from discrimination based upon race, color, creed, religion, age, sexual orientation, or national origin, disability, sex, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, familial status, or other factors in connection with employment, housing and real property, public accommodations, public services, and education, credit and business and for improving human relations in the community. The Commission shall cooperate with the State of Minnesota Department of Human Rights, the Minnesota League of Human Rights Commissions and other agencies in their programs of human rights. The Commission shall assist in the implementation of such programs as shall be undertaken by said Council and Board, and shall carry out the study and report - making and all other functions assigned to local human rights commissions by Minnesota Statutes Chapter 363A, as amended; and support the home, family and human relations in the City. March 24, 2004 A -2- Members • The Commission shall consist of up to 12 regular members, appointed by the Mayor with the consent of a majority of the Council, but six of the 12 regular members shall be from a list presented to the Council by the School Board. The Commission may appoint an ex- officio youth member to the Commission to participate in all discussions. Commissioners shall be appointed with due regard to their fitness for the efficient dispatch of the functions, powers, and duties vested in and imposed upon the Commission. • Members of the Commission shall be residents of the City of Edina appointed for terms of three years, except for youth members who shall be appointed for terms of one year. Upon expiration of a term of office, the member may continue to serve until the successor has been duly appointed. • Vacancies created by resignation, removal or death shall be filled through appointment by the Mayor with approval of the Council. Any person appointed to fill a vacancy occurring prior to the expiration of the term for which the predecessor was appointed shall be appointed for the remainder of such term. Whenever the term of a member originally proposed by the School Board expires, the successor shall be appointed by the Mayor with the approval of the Council from a list of candidates presented by the School Board. • Members of the Commission shall serve without compensation. • Any member of the Commission may voluntarily resign there from or may be removed from office by majority vote of the Council. • Removal of members should be consistent with Section 180.02 of the City Code. March 24, 2004 -3- Duties of the Commission • It shall be the duty of the Commission to advise and counsel the Council and School Board on matters relating to discrimination and human relations referred to herein; to implement such programs of education and community action approved by the Council which are designed to effectuate the public policy as stated in the Commission's purpose; to cooperate with the State of Minnesota Department of Human Rights, the Minnesota League of Human Rights Commissions and other agencies and programs which relate to the public policy stated herein; and to study, report and undertake other functions as are assigned to local commissions under and pursuant to chapter 363A of the Minnesota Statutes, and to discharge its duties under said Chapter 363A with regard to specific matters referred to it by the State Commissioner of Human Rights or filed with it by individuals. Meetings of Members • Regular meetings of the Commission shall be held at least ten times per year and each meeting shall generally be limited to two (2) hours. • A majority of the members of the Commission shall be requisite and shall constitute a quorum at all meetings of the members for the transaction of business. If a Commission member has offered his or her resignation and is unable to serve until the successor is appointed, that office will be counted in determining a quorum. If, however, such majority shall not be present at such meeting, the members present thereat shall have power to adjourn the meeting from time to time without notice other than announcement at the meeting, until the requisite number of members shall be present. At such adjourned meeting at which the requisite number of members shall be present, any business may be transacted which might have been transacted at the meeting as originally notified. March 24, 2004 -4- • Each member shall be entitled to one vote. All elections and questions shall be decided by a majority vote of those present. A member may not vote by proxy. • Written notice of Commission, meetings shall be mailed or otherwise delivered to each member at least five (5) days prior to any regular meeting of the Commission. Each notice of meeting shall set forth with sufficient particularity the agenda of matters to be considered at such meeting. • Matters of an emergency nature not on the agenda maybe considered at the time of any Commission meeting by consent of a majority of the members present. • Special meetings of the members for any purpose or purposes may be called by the Commission chair or upon the request of one or more_ Commission members, such request to state the purpose or purposes of the proposed meeting. Business transacted at all such meetings shall be confined to the objects stated in the call of such meeting. Written notice of special meetings of the members stating the time, place and object thereof, shall be mailed or otherwise delivered at least five (5) days before such meeting to each member. • At any regular meeting of the Commission, the order of the business shall be as follows: 1) Determination of a quorum and call to order 2) Approval of minutes of preceding meeting 3) Chair report, including presentation of written communications 4) Reports of committees 5) Unfinished and old business 6) New Business 7) Hearing from the public 8) Adjournment • All regular and special meetings of the Commission at which official action is taken shall be public meetings and no person shall be excluded therefrom. March 24, 2004 -5- Officers • The officers of the Commission shall be recommended by a nominating committee or nominated from the floor and chosen by the members and shall consist of a Chair, a 1st Vice Chair and a 2nd Vice Chair. Officers shall be elected for one -year terms in February of each year and shall serve until the successors have been elected and assume office. Officers shall serve for a period of not more than two (2) consecutive years in a specific office. Chair • The Chair shall preside at all meetings of the Commission. He /she will sign all documents theretofore approved by the Commission. He /she shall, with the concurrence of a majority of Commission members, appoint all committee members. 1st Vice Chair • The 1st Vice Chair, in the absence or disability of the Chair, shall perform the duties and exercise the powers of the Chair and such other duties as the Commission shall prescribe. 2nd Vice Chair • The 2nd Vice Chair, in the absence or disability of the Chair and the 1st Vice Chair, shall perform the duties and exercise the powers of the Chair and such other duties as the Commission shall prescribe. Meetings • All meetings of the Commission shall be open to the public, be governed by Robert's Rules of Order, and otherwise be held pursuant to its bylaws. The Commission shall hold its regular meetings on such fixed date and in such fixed place as it from time to time shall determine. The minutes of all meetings shall be recorded and a copy thereof transmitted to each member of the Council and School Board. March 24, 2004 -6- Committees • There shall be an Executive Committee composed of the elected officers of the Commission. The Executive Committee shall perform those duties and exercise those powers delegated to it by the Commission, and shall have the power to act for the Commission in the intervals between its meetings with its actions subject to approval or ratification by the Commission at its next meeting. Meetings of the Executive Committee to transact business shall be held pursuant to such notice and at such times as agreed upon by the members thereof. • The Commission may create such special committees as are deemed necessary. A special committee shall report to the Commission and shall continue in existence until dissolved by the Commission. • The Commission may create advisory committees to aid in its activities, with such advisory committees to be composed of Commission members and other residents of Edina as appointed by the Chair of the Commission with the approval of the Commission. Such advisory committees shall continue in existence until dissolved by the Commission. Amendments • These Bylaws may be amended at a meeting of the Commission called for that purpose by the affirmative vote of a majority of the Commission members provided that the substance of the proposed amendment shall have been submitted in writing to the members at least ten (10) days prior to such meeting. March 24, 2004 Members Present Jim Campbell Carol Carmichiel Amy Frankfurt Janice Joshua Idelle Longman Sharon Ming Mel Ogurak Andy Otness Wayne Prochniak Eileen Supple EDINA HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION TUESDAY, MARCH 23, 2004 MAYOR'S CONFERENCE ROOM Members Absent Betsy Flaten Guests Jeanne Massey Carol Frisch Staff Susan Heiberg Affordable HousinE RFP Jeanne Massey, planner and independent consultant, was welcomed. Carol Frisch, a member of the RPC Subcommittee, was present as well. Sharon Ming, on behalf of the Subcommittee, shared the RFP. and a distribution list developed by Jeanne for an affordable housing consultant. The Commission reviewed the RFP, with the following edits and comments: • Edina has the highest share of homeowners and renters in South Hennepin who pay 30% or more of their income on housing. This percentage is the standard threshold for housing affordability. • The Edina Affordable Housing Initiative is a coalition of individuals from the faith community, led by the Edina Community Lutheran Church. • The lack of affordability makes it very difficult for older adults who wish to move out of their existing Edina homes and remain living in Edina. • The challenge of developing affordable housing in Edina is recognized, and it is a part of the City's strategic plan. The conversation needs to take place as to what affordable housing means to the community. • Education is necessary because of preconceived notions; ongoing education helps to define guidelines, values and principles. • Touch base with the City Council and School Board regarding membership on the task force to assure equal participation by professionals and the community-at- large. The City Council may want to appoint the task force members. • The consultant must be a person with expertise in order to "hit the ground running." • The Edina Chamber of Commerce will be added to the RFP distribution list. The suggested timeline was identified: • RFP release — April 9, 2004 • Proposals due — May 17, 2004 d �' I, • Interviews /selection –by June 4, 2004 • Project start date - no later than end of June, 2004 • Project end date– December 31, 2005 Andy Otness seconded the motion of Eileen Supple to approve the Affordable Housing RFP as amended; the motion carried. Approval of Minutes On page two of the minutes'of February 24, 2004, regarding educational activities, it was corrected to say that "Idelle Longman and Wayne Prochniak will meet with Dan Guida, the Director of the League of Minnesota Human Rights Commissions, regarding a presentation at the Commission's May meeting regarding the gay community, how it is treated and how to be prepared when complaints occur." Additionally; on page two regarding communications, it was corrected to say that "Wayne Prochniak received a phone call from a gay - rights activist group regarding a domestic partners registry ordinance to create visitation rights in hospitals concerning next of kin. Presently, the Commission has not received a proposal from the group: ". Andy.Otness seconded Mel Ogurak's motion to. amend the minutes as presented above; the motion carried. Senior Assessment Eileen Supple shared the update of the Senior Assessment Subcommittee. She reported that Gordon Hughes is suggesting that the Commission bypass. the formation of a task force. altogether and move toward the creation of a Senior Commission —an advisory body comparable to. the Human Relations Commission, Planning Commission, Park Board, etc. The Commission concurred with this recommendation and advised the Subcommittee to move forward in presenting a proposal to the City Council for the creation of a Senior Commission, addressing a mission statement and composition. As a result, roles with other bodies, such as the Senior Advisory. Board, would have to be evaluated. The Subcommittee will meet and make recommendations to bring back to the Commission. Bylaws & Commission Name The Bylaws Subcommittee —Jim Campbell, Idelle Longman and Mel Ogurak- presented the updated /amended Commission bylaws of February 5, 2004. Janice Joshua seconded Eileen Supple's motion to approve the 2 -5 -04 bylaws with the amendments; the motion carried. Mel Ogurak seconded Jim Campbell's motion to recommend to the Edina City Council the Commission's name change to "Edina Human Rights and Relations Commission "; the motion carried with two nays. The Subcommittee will present a report to the City Council with background and perspective regarding the proposed name change, and the Commission will review this report before it goes to the Council. School District DiversityCouncil Eileen Supple reported that the Council is considering focus groups to look at attitudes around diversity in the schools and is looking at the District's strategic plan regarding diversity. There is a film project at the High School — "Welcome to Edina Schools" —which will be produced in different languages. WMEP is providing grant opportunities for students in grades 8 through 12 to help. them get acclimated to the school system. Adjournment There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:20 PM. WP /sh Respectfully submitted, C`S�* Wayne Prochniak,l'` Vice Chair Edina Human Relations Commission w MEMORANDUM DATE: October 28, 2003 TO: Susan.Heiberg FROM: Gordon Hughes SUBJECT: HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION This .morning I received a telephone call from Melvin Ogurak, a member of the Human Relations Commission. Mn Ogurak advised that a Committee o M e Human advised that theecommittee is the purpose of evaluating the Commissions by Rights and Relations . considering recommending renaming the Commissio ` uman e I advis . Ogurak that the Commission ": He asked for my opinion concern ' Chang • 1 e, City Cou ca would need to act on a name change b endin Secdo e which currently refers to. e -Fluman a lions mm' ion . 0 a ee ttt t the Council would likely take the recommendation of the Commission this regard, provided rak 1 Attorney did not find a legal issue -involved with such a name change. I the also � a Ogfu the that I. would research. past ordinances to determine the origin Commission. The Commission was established in 1970 by the. City Council. At that time, rdinance en closed). In named. "The Local Human Rights Cow 1031 (copy of establishing filar t 1972, the Commission apparen y conducted a by -law review. similar to what is now occurring, and Edina in connection. with that review apparent) decided to rename the rand misee to suggest Human Relations Commission". The. enclosed August 25, 1972, mem a name was ase on a same a set of by- aws at had been provided by the State. -par- y, sim ar organizations at t time in the State were referred to as "human vreiatio rr a ity unc a opte r inance N�. K, 19 missions . n e ruary es is e e mmission, presuma y ase upon a y- aw study that had en cor "T e prior year. or inance copy enc ose renamed the human rights commission as "The Ill 11 Loca Human Re arions Commission ". Subsequent ordinance amendments apparently de eted the work "Luca from the ti e. Among the commission's dudes is to undertake functions assigned to local commissions pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 363. This statute defines the term "Local Commission ". This term refers to an agency created by a city through a municipal ordinance for the purpose of d ealuses th Y g is discrimination on the basis of race, color, etc. Therefore, it appears that a statute terminology as a way of accounting for the various titles that individual cities may use for their �x commissions. I be a 1 e electi ed& name -for ur Commission as long as its duties include the obligatio si d to it o�ing..to.Minnesota Statute 3 e ity Attorney should be consu to on this referred t t e Count I hope this is helpful with respect to the Commission's deliberations. Please advise if I can answer any further questions. GLH/dw Fy A I if D — Aoa:L V if r Ll ORDINANCE NO. 104 An Ordinance Establishing a Local Human Rights Commission in the Village and Defining its Powers and Duties. Section 1- It is hereby found and determined that it is the public policy of the Council and the School Board of Independent School District No. 273, Minnesota, to secure for ity, freedom from discrimination all individuals in the commun because of race, color, creed, religion, or national origin, in connection with employment, housing and real property, public accommodations, public, services, and education; that the Council desires to cooperate with the State of Minnesota Department of Human Rights and other agencies in their programs of human rights; and that the Council and the School Board also jointly desire to improve the human relations climate of the community. Sec. 2. �s b ' d Purpose of Human Rights Commis n. The Edina Human a ations omrrussion her y established to aid and advise the Council and the School Board of Independent School District No. 273 in securing for all individuals of the community, freedom from discrimination because of race, color, creed, religion, or national origin in connection with employment, housing and real property, public accommodations, public services, and education, to assist in the implementation of such programs as shall be undertaken by said Council and Board, and to carry out the investigative, study, report - making and all - other functions assigned to local human rights commissions by Minnesota Statutes, Chap Ter 363, as amen e Sec. 3. Membership of commission. The Commission shall consist of 14 members, all appointed by the Mayor with the approval of the Council, but 7 from a list of candidates Prepared by the Mayor and Council, and 7 from a list presented to the Council by the School Board. The former list shall include. one Edina resident who is a high school or college student, one member of the Council, and five other residents; the latter list shall include one Edina resident who is a high school student, one member of the School Board, and five other residents. Membeys of the Commission shall be appointed with due regard to their fitness for `the efficient dispatch of the functions, powers and duties vested in and imposed upon the Commission. Members of the Commission shall be appopinted for terms of three years, except for the high school or cbllege students and elected officials who shall be appointed for terms of one year each. From the five remaining candidates on each list, one shall be appointed for a term of one year, two for a term of two years, and two for a_term of three years. Upon the expiration of his term of office a member shall continue to serve until his successor shall have been appointed. Any person appointed to'. fill a vacancy occurring prior to the expiration of the term for. which his predecessor was appointed shall be appointed for the remain- der of such term. Whenever the term of a member originally proposed by the School Board expires, or such member vacates his office, his successor shall likewise be chosen from a list of candidates presented by the School Board. Members of the Commission shall serve without compensation and may resign voluntarily or be removed from office by majority vote of the Council. _ Sec. 4. Duties of the commission. The Commission shall study and review programs' and policies of the Village and Independent School District No. 273, and aid and advise the Council and School Board , on active programs of education, community policy and action directed to create for all individuals the opportunity to obtain employment, housing, and other real estate, and full and equal utilization of public accommodations, public services, and educational institutions without discrimination because of race, color, creed, religion, or national origin. The Commission shall transmit copies of minutes of all meetings to the Mayor and Chairman of the School Board. The Commission shall discharge its duties under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 363, with regard to specific matters involving discrimination which are referred to it by the State Commissioner of Human Rights or filed with it by individuals. sec. 5. Organization. The Commission shall: (1) Elect a Chairman and Vice Chairman at the first meeting in February who shall serve for a period of one year. (2) Adopt such bylaws as shall be necessary or desirable for the conduct of its business. (3) Appoint a Secretary from within its own group, or request assignment of a staff secretary from the Village or School District. The Secretary shall 'perform such clerical duties on behalf of the Commission as may be assigned by the Chairman. Additional advisory staff may be assigned to the Commission by the Village and School District. c X - P9,3 r GENE SYLVESTRE ASSOCIATES, FOSHAY TOWER, MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402. (612) 336 -4679 / Augu5 L. I.-, i �� • .- TO:... MEMBERS OF THE EDINA HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION FROM: Gene Syl SUBJECTc, i� an Rights Commission or As background material for our up- coming meeting to discuss the roles-of the Human Rights Commission and.. the consultant to the Commission, please find enclosed. ordinances from Golden Valley� St. Louis Par and the League of Human Rights Comaus*sions. �y'_9a�F -�SDa 763. Sqq3- .oao We are tol that the League of Human Ri hts 'ons' form C �p e y- ws for Loca Human Re at3 Commii 's presen y. use y about .90% of the Commissions in the State. GS:kj Enc. 61 P adopted by the city council of Pursuant to ordinance or resolution relating to and on Tn—anmi—e—of—mu—nic—ippa—lit—Y)-- (date) providing for the establishment, appointment, organization and responsibi- ]ities of Human Relations Commission, the said municipality by-laws, and rules for the conduct Commission does -hereby adopt the following Y- or its affairs. Article I. Name . The name-Of this organization shall be the mun_ZCipality Human.Relations Commission. Art le II. Policy It shall be the public policy of the Human Relations Commission to fulfill its resposib ecuring for in partner with the State Department of Human Rights ant ,F� i blc accom- all•citizens equal opportunity in housing, employm modations, public services, and education, and to work consistently • to improve the human relations climate of- Article III. Membership : The Commission shall consist of 15 members appointed by 'the Mayor with the approval of the city council. Seven shall be appointed for ,. two years terms expirino �,. - 1969 and every for terms expiring thereafter, and eight shall be app two years thereafter. 1970 and every Article IV. Officers. 'Section 1. Personnel The officers shall consist of a Chairman, vice - chairman, recording secretary, and corresponding secretary. Section 2. Election and Term Officers shall be elected for a term of one year at the first regular meeting of the Commission and thereafter at the of each year. (month Section 3. Duties The Chairman shall preside at all meetings and appoint committee chairmen. The vice - chairman shall preside in .Y Page n"4 the absence of the cha3 -rman anu yUj..LV ..• - - - - - -- - -- 4 ' by the chairman. The recording secretary handle minutes of all meetings. The corresponding all correspondence. Article V. Commit -- Membership' Section 1. The Commission chairman shall appoint seven chairmen for the" folloidng coimni.ttees, whose membership shall be appointed by each chairman from the community at large: Housing, F�nployment, Education, Public Accommodations, Public Services, Legislation, and pubic Relations. Section 2. Committee Secretary Each Corimattee chairman shall appoint a committee secretary from the committee membership who shall be responsible for recording minutes of the meetings* Section 3. Meetings. The Committee chairmen will schedule the committee meeting times-and places. Section 4. Du The duties Of the standing committees shall be to establish programs in their areas of concern and make recommendations to the Commission. - Article VI. Meetings of the Commission Section '1. Re r•" Regular meetings will be held on at in • Section 2. Special. Special or emergency meetings may be called at any time by the Commission chairmen. ,Section 3. Votin . A quorum shall consist. of eight members. of tend recommendation or motions must be approved by a J quorum being present. Article VII. Duties of the Conmi.ssion Section 1. receive and act upon recommendations of The ComJni.ssion shall the various committees. . C-41 ' Section 2. � . or actions•will be referred and/or These recommendations and council and to the State reported to the mayor and city , Department of Human Rights. Article VIII. Amendments and Parliamentary Authority Section 1. be amended by a majority vote of the These procedures may resent, provided that advance COMM ssion, a quorum being p . notice-has been given all members. Section 2. Pliamentary Authority ar Robert's Rules of Order shall be the governing authority for all meetings of this committee and its committees. JV ey i r i ' 1�Ex SJ •, -ox 1:3i aL Ga7 LtJaJ[di...s..�� ��; y� Pd..'Vr �'4" rm V If NT .115 RM .SE W %a ' 1j{ ,-«5 �t +1 d fib-- « M^i bbwaCi 0�: Z.-Se t.t.is« Ccz tin �+� •" F• 3 na ¢�;...4: �� y 273 �i!'.LiOG'Zy are) . �4: U � L La1.'•• r.�du : 03r 01-1. r s on is o€ the y a_in =ry ,.•.` �rr•y i ^ W �: i2S-.� Oct. �Z'a2 CGiGi� C',ie�ly .L3� b.. p. '3 2q r..: Cr -hCjiS o an fie^,} pyu�,i:?c' -� s• j7i s;'�2 e^ v::' c�r~� � an cr• entisa tt~ ea �oy --nS: o daGic :s, is;xblf. sexvx�8 cnd a U Gni C1 hutcan in ths Con. an (2) Imp. rov the hos family sad .tb Lit St;ats o €isrse�ope_2 �ynt`�d'"".. the Wi3m of L;uzm Rights Cos�dssa other o�,,licss..►. �.�:.: • pros;rLghty. ' gas�b5 €gb=nt `o€ the M� relations COMAnsion. Will= 5�.. 2. establ isiae1. r 3 ich tise M rab p and f:��: a helatiOn3 ssfoa i.t� }taseby dies � 3na r. set forth* s£aa�. 3 Cr�asion eb all C « o£ SeC. �x h sM of the Co .s naval 09 3. CoU.0. - 4_ Lrs4 �s all appointted. by Pha ay OT - s: 3 £su a lit o€ udidateta prepared by the Hoot �d �cuncily � 7 €i�� �. list presented to the a by tt . Sa�noo8 8osi+Zl . the €e stu snt as si lue a one Sd:aa' resie et bhs £s a high sahiwa og College stud; and as£s £ae l � x+esidc t. ,uho is a.'i : h other y�£desss • the 7�tter, 1£at s3�11 �1�' €£w otbar rasa � ts» =UMIL studeat,� • Mes o ti 3a SriaooE.. d to �.r € i s ors of the d3i s .oa.shall be appointed s�iltit aua $agsr of the £une�� � ?�� aad duties 'meted £a and s ups aj= . mss . o€ .the I ss£oA egg. s be utz- an a for f h s�c�ol or col2.ege sCadrats� aaa �1eci•ec? terms m€ three yeano e=Vt for t� her ,, �h. - the €ice c € €ieis U sbg1Z to appointed €cs teams of aae 3 anted €aF a term of cam. . ' iains c=didAtes each 3i.st? one sFss3B. ise s. po US :mss for a tAro of two - y+a� s and. t6a .o� a 'term o€ three yam: �p the eXPiret�.icu o€ his trim of afix�P a �r s�I3 eantix�e:e to sex � sFU; e � On �Po£nLed to fill a big su�ssor sb&ll: have been apgointsed: �y P Vi O u n'* . p*ri or to tba expaxaica O tee £or w�.i�iz hf s• y ofnte3 tsar �: 'udax 4 such i:er CIL seer was sppoLntoc s..2 be a,7iz b .aclzd e£..a... q Gam. the to Qf a �r o�;i�l,y p�pod. Y . from P. :fit v cat . Osfi€e, his ssoa' saua3i r so ohs *� �.r3ss:�an oh al'- w- c;�*xic's£c?c ®a prea�:ed by the SChool. o'}-. d - €rte ,cis tion and may :.ess � col s7at�-'�.! y or irz� �a c€iee by„or=��:y. vote o£ t1 Council. te�-,rxu_S n. .'L�� .a3?.;:: � � . 4. �.�u�'a0� og the iQ. ....� arc � . �-- Ljaa -,d on r�^I* � w..l�s:;n� .s. ion to .� �� Ctia, ed Co. he�inz) Lo YG� i�.'� -._v f. rt�.G .:{ rp :F'3Lt, �i.s 033 •�:�.. i�-Z* 'Ti`...Ci +y e4`il� t�: ' ` 5 �iS2 '�►^t'xfo to �-�...i:e-,.i:.._ ang z_Ap3 G®� .,.�4q �,����� ��aa..,,��[� Zi. �!G•'yr'.;I�,w•! :iia »� �JrQ`:.'r.: �i. c "� r• • Sa�etiS�u'G in section n.j •tea 2'� �a�..' +' Cs fj';x :}. .~.•.;.0 e'�'.•tS,}. t,= public p92IJCY. 2 za .: J. . �c? 1; tom - en cCV Lea Gi �; zL • a -public POUCY z3 he vhicTLI =?a =e .w te . _ grWIS port d. °. a�.�e. oL-bex at a;:s 3 t o. S +ups �� F3'.li s. to Ch-o?- �J3 [)� E'.!] . � r"'L:� l C oCw.Crix_�" •,`�: ^ :,': t ' n$ f;$ 6.az t'3 .�ILt6n.,i S-Ii C+�.�2��CTL.i t Ff i GL2�: -."i 03 0.''.�•e -c" i�: °1' . it-. �•' r"sed • to f.t: by Sb . 5 Elect LscS� q,�£ y�e ,� v YY row .,.3z 3 p4"`�t:C :! 1-'}- mzo iii:= -- • V u '� L .�..rlf'i i B `+a' -ia ��v °v R @S .0 C tii:iJlr -woo cyR7 "i, 7:s C :' n tt c^•, i �C� try 68 Gi' T�7.0 �' b1�.u: ci1T G� i' i 4�.- .i+-c. �, ice? (2) pars. i'.�e .off her sbse:�e, t� vice 9LZ8111.p id i "•i:� .., i�..4't. y tro . ires ,zberta►3p or at i tc Cizu 9 (23 Appoint �L b the Vi7.j or- the School S?.sc-�%�: «. .hat a eCaff s�€�e€�sy be guvaisimd Y -. a �'s, -�, Si.= GlIs l be C�3t'.�"i .c 4 �'C Al McUUS6 o.. ub�iEc� be 9w .7. �7cs c£ UYda� raa o? uesj% -ecbla .9CCr Pou'° p Cassia QD - - md be adP� It sh l to gae dUtY of the •�cretazy a£ O to the- . . its b�.�i �• d r a t COPY t'A o �sioa to MCDIA.ae tdcu as a all rese t � i �c�imcia ps Spool.. ���. : _ • •'• . . each °_•• °' he �a sue t:. as Tbi Ewa shall be Ste. $; Tr,Ofl• '. ..:,t.:;:: .. its ps5s ga. j�nd Pu�' -,�. s � Fi rok lauding: hebraWY 5, 1973 Second. 29�h 1, 197. in the Edina 2tm Publisbed ?�gor 6f ll.ege �. z1c c I a f! L, x k,� ti , r k , n .,.�4q �,����� ��aa..,,��[� Zi. �!G•'yr'.;I�,w•! :iia »� �JrQ`:.'r.: �i. c "� r• • Sa�etiS�u'G in section n.j •tea 2'� �a�..' +' Cs fj';x :}. .~.•.;.0 e'�'.•tS,}. t,= public p92IJCY. 2 za .: J. . �c? 1; tom - en cCV Lea Gi �; zL • a -public POUCY z3 he vhicTLI =?a =e .w te . _ grWIS port d. °. a�.�e. oL-bex at a;:s 3 t o. S +ups �� F3'.li s. to Ch-o?- �J3 [)� E'.!] . � r"'L:� l C oCw.Crix_�" •,`�: ^ :,': t ' n$ f;$ 6.az t'3 .�ILt6n.,i S-Ii C+�.�2��CTL.i t Ff i GL2�: -."i 03 0.''.�•e -c" i�: °1' . it-. �•' r"sed • to f.t: by Sb . 5 Elect LscS� q,�£ y�e ,� v YY row .,.3z 3 p4"`�t:C :! 1-'}- mzo iii:= -- • V u '� L .�..rlf'i i B `+a' -ia ��v °v R @S .0 C tii:iJlr -woo cyR7 "i, 7:s C :' n tt c^•, i �C� try 68 Gi' T�7.0 �' b1�.u: ci1T G� i' i 4�.- .i+-c. �, ice? (2) pars. i'.�e .off her sbse:�e, t� vice 9LZ8111.p id i "•i:� .., i�..4't. y tro . ires ,zberta►3p or at i tc Cizu 9 (23 Appoint �L b the Vi7.j or- the School S?.sc-�%�: «. .hat a eCaff s�€�e€�sy be guvaisimd Y -. a �'s, -�, Si.= GlIs l be C�3t'.�"i .c 4 �'C Al McUUS6 o.. ub�iEc� be 9w .7. �7cs c£ UYda� raa o? uesj% -ecbla .9CCr Pou'° p Cassia QD - - md be adP� It sh l to gae dUtY of the •�cretazy a£ O to the- . . its b�.�i �• d r a t COPY t'A o �sioa to MCDIA.ae tdcu as a all rese t � i �c�imcia ps Spool.. ���. : _ • •'• . . each °_•• °' he �a sue t:. as Tbi Ewa shall be Ste. $; Tr,Ofl• '. ..:,t.:;:: .. its ps5s ga. j�nd Pu�' -,�. s � Fi rok lauding: hebraWY 5, 1973 Second. 29�h 1, 197. in the Edina 2tm Publisbed ?�gor 6f ll.ege �. z1c c I a f! L, x k,� ti , r k , § 363A.07 HUMAN RIGHTS Cross References Actions; combining allegations of violations under this chapter and of dismissal from employment forage, see § 181.81. Evidence, use by commissioner of human rights of job evaluation system established ,under § 471.994 and reports compiled under § 471.995 in actions alleging discrimination, see § 471.997. Low rent housing, selection of tenants, see § 469.022. Public works contracts, see § 181.59. Redevelopment projects, use, see § 469.109 et seq. Law Review and Journal Commentaries The 1967 amendments to the Minnesota state Recent developments in civil rights litigation. act against discrimination and the uniform law Jean James, 64 Hennepin Law. 4 (Sept. —Oct. commissioners' model anti- discrimination act. 1994). Carl A. Auerbach, 52 Minn.L.Rev. 231 (Dec. 1967). Library References Civil Rights X1705. Westlaw Topic No. 78. C.J.S. Civil Rights §§ 188 to 189. United States Code Annotated Deprivation of rights under color of law, offense, civil action, see 18 U.S.C.A. § 242; 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983. Due process and equal protection clauses, see U.S.C.A. Const. Amend. 14, § 1. Equal rights under the law, general provision, see 42 U.S.C.A. § 1981. Federally assisted programs generally, see 42 U.S.C.A. § 2000d et seq. Housing, equal opportunities, see 42 U.S.C.A. § 1982. Public contracts, equal opportunities, see 42 U.S.C.A. § 2000e et seq. Notes of Decisions In general 1 Metropolitan transit commission 3 Purpose 2 1. In general Although the state act against discrimination does not expressly grant authority to establish local human rights commissions, the establish- ment of such commissions would be fully con- sistent with the state policy as declared in sec- tion 363.12, subd. 1. Op.Atty.Gen., 1006, May 15, 1968. 2. Purpose General purpose of Human Rights Act is to place individuals discriminated against in same position they would have been in had no dis- crimination occurred. Brotherhood of Ry. and S. S. Clerks, Freight Handlers, Exp. and Station Emp., Lodge 364 v. State by Balfour, 1975, 303 Minn. 178, 229 N.W.2d 3. Civil Rights @a 1004 3. Metropolitan transit commission Metropolitan transit commission's employ- ment practices regarding physical qualifications of its bus drivers were subject to regulation by city's department. of human rights. Lewis ex rel. Welles v. Metropolitan Transit Com'n, 1982, 320 N.W.2d 426. Civil Rights a 1127 UNFAIR DISCRIMINATORY PRACTICES 363A.08. Unfair discriminatory practices relating to employment. or unfair employment practice Subdivision 1. Labor organization. Except when based on a bona fide occupational qualification, it is an unfair employment practice for a labor 42• I EX �'t6Iti Cr My"Fl, -� ff 'MINNESOTA HUMAN x -'. N.: g,,- or ,..ganization because (cFt�' '' tal status, status wit 4 inari - tloii, or age: (a) to deny full and e or to a member; ship (b) to expel a member (c) to discriminate ag IF respect to hiring, app conditions, facilities, or (d) to fail to classify discriminate against a p Subd. 2. Employer. qualification, it is an u: race, color, creed, reli regard to public assist disability, sexual orient; (a). refuse to hire or t excludes a person seeki (b) discharge an emy (c) discriminate agai tion, terms, upgradin_ Subd.3. Employmc tional qualification, it agency, because of ra status, status with reg� _age to: (a) refuse or fail to ment or otherwise to d (b) comply with a i employment if the reqi to comply with the prc Subd.4. Employer, when based on a bon ment practice for an before a person is em labor organization, to: (1) require or reque color, creed, religion, V, public assistance, dis; J_ - :: 363A.20, subdivisions or request person t q exclusive purpose of r R.s is required by the Uni i ` the . United States of City of Edina General Code Provisions and Administration 140.04 Section 140 - Human Relations Commission 140.01 Policy Statement. It is the public policy of the Council to: A. Work and cooperate with the Board of Education of Independent School District No. 273, Minnesota (the School Board) to carry out the purpose and intent of this Section. B. Secure for all of the residents of the City freedom from discrimination because of race, color, creed, religion, age, sex, sexual orientation, or national origin in connection with employment, housing and real property, public accommodations, public services and education. C. Support the home, family and human relations in the'City. D. Cooperate with the State Department of Human Rights, the Minnesota League of Human Rights Commissions and other agencies in their programs of human rights. 140.02 Establishment. To further accomplishment of the above policies, the Human Relations Commission (the "Commission ") is hereby established. 140.03 Duties. The Commission shall: A. Advise and counsel the Council and School Board on matters relating. to discrimination and human relations referred to herein. B. Implement such programs of education and community action which are designed to effectuate the public policy stated in Subsection 140.01 and which have been approved by the Council. C. Cooperate with the State Department of Human Rights, the State League of Human Rights Commissions and other agencies and programs which relate to the public policy stated herein. D. Investigate, study, report and undertake other functions as are assigned to local commissions under and pursuant to M.S. 363, and to discharge its duties under M.S. 363 with regard to specific matters referred to it by the State Commissioner of Human Rights or filed with it by individuals. 140.04 Membership. The Commission shall consist of 12 regular members, appointed by the Mayor with the consent of a majority of the Council, but six of the 12 Commission may shall be from a list presented to the Council by the School Board. appoint an ex officio youth member to the Commission to participate in all discussions. Members of the Commission shall be residents of the City, be appointed for a term of three years and serve until a successor shall have been appointed. Upon termination of a member's ww 140-1 Ex k t 6 lt 1� �x i City of Edina General Code Provisions and Administration 140.06 term, that member's successor shall be appointed for the remainder of such term. Whenever the term of a member originally proposed by the SchoSchoolrBoardiresMemberse f ethe successor shall be chosen from a list presented by the Commission shall serve without compensation and .may resign voluntarily or be removed by majority vote of the Council or pursuant to Subsection 180 of this Code. Commission members who discontinue legal residency in the City may be removed from office by the Mayor with the consent of a majority of the members of the Council. 140.05 Organization. The Commission shall: A. Elect from its members a chair and a vice chair, each of whom shall serve for a period of not more than two years. B. Adopt such bylaws as shall be necessary or desirable for conduct of its business. C. Appoint a. secretary from its membership or request that a staff secretary be furnished by the City or the School District. If a secretary is assigned by the City, the secretary shall perform only such clerical duties on behalf of the Commission as may be assigned by the chair. with- *the consent of the Manager. Additional advisory staff may be' assigned to the Commission by the Manager. 140.06 Meetings. All meetings of the Commission shall be open to the public, be. governed by Roberts Rules of Order, and otherwise be held pursuant to its bylaws. The (.. Commission shall hold its regular meetings on such fixed date and in such fixed place as it from time to time shall determine. The minutes of all meetingsshall be recorded and a copy thereof transmitted to each member of the Council and School-Board. History: Ord 106 3 -1 -73 amended by Ord 106 -A 1- 16 -78, Ord 106 -A2 6- 27 -79; Ord 2000 -2. 2 -1-00 Reference: M.S. 363 140 -2 � h�b1+ ps�Jp,Aj EDINA HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION MISSION The mission of the Edina Human Relations Commission is to advocate for basic human rights hts and needs in our community and to promote response b-ility and i en grity in our human relationships by providing service, information and recommendations, cooperating with other communities and governmental organizations, and sponsoring forums and community events. BELIEFS We believe that: • Each person has inherent worth. • Each person has the right to be treated with fairness, respect and dignity. • The community has the responsibility to ensure that the basic needs of an individual are met.. • Any individual who believes he /she has been treated unfairly is entitled to a place to be heard and seek resolution. • A healthy community embraces change. • The family and community share the responsibility to teach and model behavior that allows all to live in harmony. • Words and actions that are insensitive to differences are hurtful. • Prejudice is destructive to communities. • Individual differences enhance the community. • Sharing our values and experiences enhances community. Ex k-,�;r E L AGUE OF M TS COMMISSIONS r CONFERENCE REGISTRATION PRICE B To: Human Rights Commissions Date: March 15, 2003 From: Board of Directors, League of Minnesota. Human Rights Commissions Re: 32nd Annual Conference, Frida ; September 19, 2003 Chaska Community Center, Chas a, inneso a a. m. - 3:30 p.m. "The Lessons of.Brown. vs. The Board of Education - Desegregation vs. Segregation" Dear Commissoners: We are pleased to announce our 32nd Annual .Conference. This years conference is dedicated to the work of all human rights commissions in their communities and centering our energies on bringing commissions together continuing our work in response to the increase in hate crimes since the SEPTEMBER 11th TRAGEDY... We look forward to the participation of each commission in this our 32nd Annual Conference. Commissions participate by sharing past and present successes, failures, programs that work, programs that also don't work and bridges and community partnerships you have built. Commissions may share dialogs you have had, presentations,, workshops . built around function /purpose of your Human Rights Commission; any participation or work you have done with Hate and Bias Crime Response Plans, Racial Profiling addressing demographics, welcoming immigrants, working with citys, schools, in .your: neighborhoods, addressing youth involvement on commissions, addressing youth issues, sponsoring a local it essay contest, and other ideas, programs your commission statewide exhange of ideas and commissions around the state. This conference networking. Let us know what you would like to share at the 32nd Annual Conference 2003 by completing and returning the attached Commission Information Sheet and the enclosed Display Table /Booth Reservation Form. - -- - -�\ We are pleased to again offer a �Special Registratio ee of Ze lTy 40 for Commissions that re inter three or more members cit staff ersonnel before temtier 5 200 . Thank you for your cooperation with the above of 763-535-1051 uora all Mort Ryweck at need any additional information, please contact 612 - 376 -0525, Thelma McKenzie at 651 - 633 -2186 and Marion Helland at 763 - 546 -7469. k� SAVE THE DATE!!! -0 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSIONS 33`d Annual Conference* Saturday, October 9, 2004 8:00 A.M. - 4:00 P.M. CITY OF ROSEVILLE John Rose Skating Oval 2661 Civic Center Drive Roseville, MN 55113 "FROM INSPIRATION TO ACTION - Challenging Human Rights Issues with Strategies and Programs" KEYNOTE SPEAKER SPECIAL GUEST LUNCHEON SPEAKER The League of Minnesota Human Rights Commissions hosts its 33'd Annual Conference complete'witn plenary sessions, breakout sessions, keynote addresses, lunch, exhibits, networking and more. •CLE and CUE Accreditation Approval pending. Clip and Mail this portion along with Registration Fee to Jane McPartiand, Financial Coordinator, 1820 — I e Avenue South #8, St Cloud, MN 58301 Name Street City State Zip Phone (Day) (Evening) City Organization /Affiliation Special Accommodation or Other Alternative Format Needed Kindly indicate your Luncheon Selection Regular Vegetarian We are pleased to again offer a Special Early Registration Fee of only $40.00 per person for Commissions that register three or more members or city staff personnel before September 21, 2004. - Please make checks payable to "LMHRC" Registration Fee: $50.00 [includes coffee, rolls, lunch, resource packets, intergroup networking and workshops]. After September 21, Registration Fee is $60.00. 'i �' *' EDUCATION COMMITTEE Leaque of Minnesota Human Rights Commissl Goals: • To educate and inform the citizens of Minnesota relative to human rights, cultural diversity and discrimination by developing and distributing brochures, videos and other materials. • To serve as a catalyst for a better understanding and appreciation of the various cultures, their histories and . contributions to society by providing educational materials. Objectives: • To provide educational information regarding multicultural diversity to citizens, schools and churches. • To *provide written information on all forms of discrimination, including hate crimes, and violations of gay and lesbian rights. • To survey schools to find existing programs and courses that. deal with human rights issues, the degree of success of these programs and what needs the schools have regarding these topics. • To sponsor public roundtable discussions on human rights ro issues. )c• To help estnhlish a center ror multicultural and human *t% rights resources. For additional information contact '`• • +'• + +: +' j: +; :'; �!� '1;f t•tf 1t Sf'�lt�f'•tiJt ti +l Jlti +ti +� ' Mnnesota Human R' hts Commissions:...... League of �9 4221 Lake Road Avenue, Robbinsdale, MN 55422 + %; + +; + ►y + +r, �... 763.535 -1051 or 763- 546 -7469 1•.%.% +•' + +,. +'. +' ++ .S. •.1• •.5 •.1• •.1•. \•. \'. •.1 •e�: \�: 11.1•}4 :111 HOW UHUMA IGHTS COMMISSION WORK WITH .SCHOOLS? in ,.. Join Committees Sponsor Events Collaborate on Projects Provide Communicate Resources HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSIONS and SCHOOLS Educate on Human Rights -,,,-'Gather Knowledge (We must do our homework') 1 Suggestions for commissions working with schools: 1. Gather knowledge: • Read. • Participate in forums and workshops. 2. - Join committees in school districts: • Contact multic al task forces. Serve on loca R c mmittees. • Run for schoo r 3. Communicate: • Respond to school issues. • Generate a school mailing list. • Send commission news to school staff. • Seelc t chera, administrators and students to serve on Human ig ts-G"ommiss�on _ • ee wi schoo supenn e every year. 4. Collaborate on projects: • Work with schools on special events. and • Write letters acknowledging programs progress noted in schools on human rights. • Help establish student human rights or multicultural groups in schools. 6. Sponsor events: • Poster or essay contests. • Discussion forums and student panels. • Human Rights Day or Week. 6. Educate on human rights: • Develop informational packets • Prepare classroom presentations 7. Provide resources: • Di stablish a speakers bureau. • Distribute multicultural reading lists. . .+ City of Golden Valley - Search the weo site Brookvlew Gott i� 8us�ness city Government community Environment Licennstr a fcle Reprcreicttlon $ Leisure Pg�rrmks h Licensing Publk SafdY roar Howe Search Search for: Human Rights Commis Start:Search`; I 'ClearW atches tl Number of documents found: 200. Click on a document to view it, or subff another search. Search Results http://www.ci.golden-valley.mn.us/_vti_script/search.htmO.idq 5/5/2004 JL. Lllul, L aln" 1Yl11lllV0Vw This section of our web site tells you where the City of St. Louis Park's offices are located and lists our phone numbers and e-mail addresses. City Phone Numbers Unless otherwise noted, all numbers listed here are area code 952. Emergency: Police, Fire, Medical ............................. 911 General City of St. Louis Park information ....................... 924 -2500 For direct access, dial these numbers - Accounts payable 924 -2680 Animal control 924 -2133 Apartment complaints 924 -2682 Assessing (property taxes & homestead) 924 -2535 Building permits 924 -2588 Cable TV (channels 17,15,96) 924 -2660 Cable TV (video classes) 924 -2528 City Council information 924 -2525 City Manager's office 924 -2525 Construction/utility projects 924 -2555 Economic Development 924 -2197 Elections 924 -2505 Fire Department (administration, information) 924 -2595 Fire Station #1 (South) 924 -2597 Fire Station #2 (North) 924 -2598 Flood plain 924 -2592 Forestry 924 -2565 Garbage collection 763883 -5423 Garbage bills 924 -2111 Homestead 924 -2534 Housing inspections 924 -2588 Housing Authority information line (subsidized housing, section 8) 924 -2514 Housing Programs 924 -2579 Housing Authority TDD (for Hearing Impaired) 924 -2668 Human Resources Cobs) 924 -2520 Human Rights Phone Line 924 -2506 Inspections Department (building permits, inspections) 924 -2588 Jobs "hot line" 924 -2527 Liability claims 924 -2513 Licenses (dogs) 924 -2588 Licenses (gambling & liquor) 928 -2840 Licenses (business & contractor) 924 -2588 Neighborhood outreach 924 -2613 Nuisance complaints 924 -2589 Official records 924 -2505 Parks and Recreation General information 924 -2540 Weather cancellation/event information line 924 -2567 Facility rental 924 -2540 Rec Center 924 -2540 Nature Center 924 -2544 Park maintenance 924 -2565 Youth and adult sports 924 -2540 Planning (Community Development) 924 -2572 Police Administration/records 924 -2600 Duty sergeant 924 -2616 Non - emergency service requests 924 -2618 Community outreach 924 -2661 Investigations 924 -2607 Crime tip line 924 -2165 Property taxes 924 -2535 Public Works & Engineering 924 -2555 Rec Center 924-2540,, 1 /� http:// www. stlouispark .org/Contact/CityNumbers.html 1/25/2004 § 363.11 Note 3 Distinctive Dental Ser Vices. P.A.. 2000: 607 440. Common law negligence action brought by for- mer employee against former employer could not be based on alleged violation of Human Rights Act. Sullivan v. Spot Weld. Inc.. App.1997, 560 N.A7:2d 712, review denied. Where employee relies upon salve facts and seeks redress for same allegedly discriminato,-Y practices to support both reprisal and separate retaliation claim, exclusive rernedy pt'ovision of Minnesota Human Rights Act (MHRA), operates as bar to assertion of cause of action under Wh_ deblower- Act. Williams v. St. Paul Ramsey Medi- cal Center, Inc., 1996, 551 N.W.2d 483. Minnesota Human Rights Act (MHRA) does not preempt common -law negligence claim even if claim could have been brought under MHRA had it been timely asserted. Vaughn v. Northwest Airlines, Ire., App.1996, 546 N.W2d 43, review granted, affirmed in part, reversed in part 5M N.W.2d 736. Failure of passenger who alleged that she had :en discriminated against by airline on basis of ,usability to timely bring claim under Minnesota Human Rights Act (MHRA) did not preclude pas -, senger from bringing common -law negligence ac- tion against airline based on breach of duty owed as common carrier. Vaughn v. Northwest A- lines, Inc., App.1996, 546 N.W.2d 43, review grant- ed, affirmed in part, reversed in part 558 N.W.2d 736. I.aw has traditionally imposed on common care- ers duty of highest degree of care and foresight for safety of its passengers consistent with its under- taking, and Minnesota Human Rights Act (MHRA) was not enacted to cut short time within which' disabled person may bring action for breach of this age -old common -law duty. Vaughn v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., App.1996, 546 N.W.2d 43, review granted, affirmed in part, reversed in part 558 N.W.2d 736. l n DEPARTMENT Or HUA A :N' PK31,17S DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN R1GIiTS 5. Preemption Minnesota Human Rights Act (MHRA; preempts a common law cause of action if 1) the I'actua! basis and injuries supporting the common. law claim also would establish a •iolatior. of the DiHR. and (21 the obligations the defendant owes to the plaintiff. as a practical matter. are the same under both the common law- an:i the MHRA. Pierce v: Rainbow Foods Group, Inc-.. D.Minn2001, 158 F.Supp.2d 969. :(iinnesota Human Rights Act (MHRA preempted former employees' negligent retention and negligent supervision claims against employer; employees relied upon same incidents of sexual harassment to establish liability under MHRA and common law. and their alleged injuries resulting from sexual harassment were same for MHRA and common law claims.. Pierce v. Rainbow Foods Group, Inc., D.Minn.2001, 158 F.Supp.2d 969. Duty imposed by the doctrines of negligent re- tention and supervision merged with those im- posed by the Minnesota Human Rights Act (MHRA) when employee informed employer that alleged supervisor had sexually assaulted her, at which time employer's statutory duty to take "timely and appropriate remedial action," sub - sumed any corresponding common law duty to take remedial measures, and thus, any assertions that employer breached common law duty of care after that time were preempted by MHRA Groz- danich v. Leisure Hills Health Center. Inc., D.Minn.1998, 25 F.Supp.2d 953, reconsideration denied 48 F.Supp.2d 885. Employee's negligent supervision claim was preempted by Minnesota Human Rights Act (MHRA), as alleged duty of employer to provide reasonably safe workplace by prodding employee with processor support to accommodate her dis- ability did not exist at common law. but was creat- ed by MHRA. Hoover v. Norwest Private Mortg. Banking, a Div. of Norwest Funding, Inc.. App. 2000. 605 N.R! 2d 757, review granted, affu-med in part, reversed in part 632 N.W.2d .5534, corrected on denial of rehearing. 6. Arbitration 4. Liberal construction Clause within. Minnesota Human Rights Act Probable cause determinations made by Com- (MHRA) providing that, as to acts, declared unfair missioner of the Department of Human Rights 31 by MHRA, procedures prodded by MHRA were or more months after charge is filed are per se exclusive, did not void arbitration provision of em- prejudicial to respondent and required dismissal of ployment agreement, while employee's claim for- complaint and this ruling applies prospectively to marital status discrimination was pending against all human rights charges filed with Minnesota former employer. Correll .v. Distinctive Dental Department of Human Rights (MDHR). State by Services. P.A., App.1999, 594 N.W2;1 222. review /Beaulieu v. RSJ. Inc.. 1996, 552 N.W.2d 695. granted. reversed 607 N.W.2d 440. C3y3.115. Referral to local commission t The commissioner. whether or not a cha °ge,h been filet uncle this ehapte'. :nab ?latter invP11 ing Eliscrinlination because of ace, coYb : (���eliglon; s xr`cre'ed, disl,�li�y :- .m_�•'i -'i &4tus,.,5la ts. W?tll..l•egard -tb public assi tallce, It'd-, nal orig:'l, age, Se \U21,1 familialsYtu to a local: conunissiotl for�tu6v quid report.) r rr --- �.._.- ..___` . 1 „ Upon referral by the commissioner, the !ocal commission shall make a repo ° arc: recommendations t0 the c- oul111ssioner• and fake other appropriate aCt1011 1k ?t! ?I!i [!le Fe :!)r its powers. ' r I (t Arnenrter it Laws 199 c. 22; F 18. ►1 I I� `_ 172 � X i 3 i 's Historical and 1993 Legislation The 1993 amenorrent included sexu :.l orientation among the stature: listed within this section. 363.12. Declaration of policy Subdivision I. It is the public policy of freedom from discrimination; (1) In employment because of race, color status, disabilit . status with regard to I). (2) In housing and real property because of marital status, disability, status with regar•( familial status; (3) In public accommodations because of sexual orientation, and disability; (4) In public services because of race, col, status, disability. sexual orientation, and (5) In education because of race, color, cr-E disability, status with regard to public assista nation threatens the rights and privileges o institutions and foundations of democracy. i all persons from wholly unfounded charges c be interpreted as restricting the implemer discrimination Subd. 2. The opportunity to obtain empl, and equal utilization of public accommodatic: without such discrimination as is prohibits( declared to be a civil right. Subd. 3. The department of human rig human rights is the successor of the state immediately prior to July 1, 1967. Subd. 4. If any provision of Laws 1967. person or circumstances is held invalid, the applications of Laws 1967, chapter 897 which or application, and to this end the pr-ovM Amended by Laws 1993, c. 22, § 19. I Laws 1967, c. 897 amended §§ 363.01, 363.1 enacted §§ 363.07:. 363.072, 363.091. 363.115: 363. 11, 363.07, 363.08. and 363.09. Historical an 1993 Legislation The 1993 amendment in Subd. : included ,' references to sexual orient.rtior. thre'.:ghout. Law- Review and Marital status discrimination: Puhtic scorn ' personal choice;— Stn1.c r. Frerzci;- 17 Wm."4itc, ell L.Rev. 563 Sexual harassment and battery: Mutually '-W sive remedies`:: indiglendenC ^2: err-- .l•?/1 "c '..�.� 4"�J1 r , al,le cau:ae ,Ietea',rlmalicans olude by gone .4na�ar cal' the 00partinent of Hunan Rig-I,ls 31 cann�c ninths after charge is tiled are per se Indirial Ica respuadenl ;[fill reeplirel dismissal of y,lainL and dll,; ruling al,plics pruspCeLively to LnO:an rivill cl,ar'W!s filed with Minnescat.:, ;irloua,l of Ill,oum I11);Id.< (MMIR). Stale by uli•n � I:`;.I Im . I:r.0 i, .,...J,1•V. :,I [� 1i.. G. Arbih- at.iun (:I ;M: ;` wil.liiu MiuncsnL', Illonan RigIILv Act. 01111.A) providing that, as to acts declared unfair by MHRA, procedures provided by MHRA were exclusive, did not void arbitration provision of em- ploynu:111. ag;recst»:ul, while employee's claim for inarkal status discrimination was pending against furinur WIT10 Ul'. Cowell V. Distinctive: Dental ,Services, P.A., App.1999, 59.1 N.W.2d `2`2'2, review I•,r :ua, ,1, rrvrr : :r,1 G07 N.W.:!,I 1 to. .I f 5. , Iteferral Lo lac.ai canlnissitA ,vhetheyy of not a charge has 1� en tiles ode t,i: pter may refer a I[,,. i, , 111•; ulvinl; rli!;(:t•imin :tt,jEm her•.at.lse of race. color, 1 J(f,ion se�x�: •e d 'llilI marital witl', r, :f :cad to pt[I,lir assistatrcc, n:I iol•,1 ui;.,it1, aKc, sMxual.o ntation, car- dial In a Ir,I ",II volunlis,inn for mild f :111(1 rte , t.. t I,i1n rc l',v,• :i1 b�+ ihr runw,issiunl•r, Inral rnnuni::xiuu sl I m:11u• :, rM11url, and make. )CP a t , e tnva t rty oes not affect. the ot.her provisions or applications of Laws 1967, chapter 897 which can be given effect without the invalid provision or applival.ion, and tat I.hix cod Lhc prervisi0us of Laws 1!J167, chapter 897 arc severable. Amended by Laws 1993, c. 22, § 19. I Laws 1967, c. 897 amended H 363.01, 363.02, 363.03, 363.04, 363.05, 363.06, 363.10, and 36:1.12, ,enacted H 363.071, 363. 072, 3113.091, 363.116, 363.116, 363.121, and 363.122, and repealed H 363.01, subd. 11, 363.07, 363.08, and 363.09. Ili,turiaal and titnt.utol ;y Note.,; 1993 Legislation The 1993 amendment in Subd. 1 included the references to sexual orientation throughout. Law Review and Journal Commentaries Mnrilal sl. :llis disc- rin,tnal.iou: PoIllir xrorn nl' Ki,....... . �:,,,,,• r ,,,•.. Ir, ru X •,.i :.... :;63.1.1 DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RIGHTS ARTMLNT OF HUMAN RIGHTS �"`� § 363.12 ,fe 3 ;tca1(Awt•. bent :d �el1 +11'1'5, P.A., '2000, 607 N.W.2d 5. Preanplio" Historical and Statutory Notes NCinnesnui 1-Ronan Rights Act (MHRA) „ ::," n :ghgeucc :,ctinn brought by fu,. r employe,: against former employer could not InvojuI,L. a cmummi law cause of ac Lion il' (1) the factual basis and injuries supporting the common 1993 Legislation 11 The 1993 amendment included sexual orientation Lased uu alleged violation of Human Rights Act. law claim also would establish a violation of the among the statuses listed within this section. Rival) V. Spot Weld, inc., App.1997, 560 N.W.2d MHRA, and (2) the obligations the defendant owes review denied. to the plaintiff, as a practical matter, are the sam under both the common law and the MH � 3.12. Declaration of policy �.! ,Inhere employee relies upon same facts and Pierce v. Rainbow Foods Group, Inc., D.Minn. 01, :I:s redress for same allegedly discriminatory 158 F.Supp.2d 969. Subdivision 1. It is the public policy of this state to secure for persons in this state, IcLices w suppo,•t bod) rep,•isal and separate Minnesota Human Rights Act (MHRA) h• om from discrimination; IiaLi,nl rl:Iinl, cNt•In,ivo remedy pruvi ion of mesnt.a H,nu:n, Ris his Act IngHI;A1. nperatns preempted former employees' negligent retention ;11111 n,y lil enl. x,y„nvixun, r laimx a1;:,inxL rmplgynr; (1 -In e o ent because of race, color, creed, religion, national nrifin, SON, In :u•it;1I I,;l, 1.1, ;,, :,, :rr.n „� +,r cai,xe „I ;,(tiw, uwlur Wl,is- taupl0yeea relied u1,un same incidents of sexual stn us, disability, status with re and tr,,�_,blic assistance, sexual orientation, and age; Y ,Ivwer Act.. Williams V. St. Paul Ramsey Medi- r enter. Inr., 1991;, at N.W.2d 183. harassment to establish liability under MHRA and law, and their alleged injuries resulting »i (2 In housine and real ; r>�erty because of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, auun•sura I Ium:ul higllts : \ct lM I I RA) dais not Irma ;L from sexual h:n•assmenl. were same for M1iRA and ma( tal status, disability, status with regard to public assistance, sexual orientation, and ,•,npl cninlann la» negligence cl;Iim even if cnl,I,nnn lam• claim,. Isigrce V. Ruinbeiw foods familial status; „„I,I Irn, h.•.•„ 111"{{4 :hl. „n,l,•r n111RA bail ;e u,nel, asserte,l. auglu, v. Nurth,vest Croop. In., n.Min,,.2nn1, i.59 F.Supp.2d 9fs9. DuL imposed b Lhe doctrines of fie y 1 Y negligent re- (3) Ica I�uldir accr,uun,,,l,tti0ns because of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, Imes. inc., Al,i,.l996, 546 N.W.2d 43, review tendon and supervision merged with those im- sex al orientation, and disability; uted, affil•Ined ill paI'L, reversed in part 558 v.2d 7311. posed by the Minnesota Human Rights Act (MHRA) when employee ee informed employer that P y 4) In public services because of race color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital ��� g alleged supervisor had sexually assaulted her, at t s s disability sexual orientation and status with regard to public assistance; and � g P ailure of passenger who alleged that she had n discrimin:ual against I,y airline on hasis of which time employer's statutory duty to -alte ••Lin,ely (5 In uc because of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital st.at.us, �nility t0 Limely hrin • claim under Minnesota k and appropriate remedial action,” sub- sumu(I any cnI•rexpnnding common law duty IA di ility, status with regard to public assistance, sexual orientation, and age. Such discrin,i- inui Iti1;•hts :1.a. (MIIIlA1 did 11111. pruclurlc pas - take rcnu:dial Innasnrex, and thus, any assertions nation threatens the right,; and privileges of the inhabitailLs of this state and menaces the U,�r from hrillging rnmu,,,n laic ne:iail once: ac•- Lh elnl,lnyer breae:hed conunon law duty of care institutions and foundations of democracy. It is also the public policy of this state to pl- Otpct. Ar;111 sI :,nlii . h::, d w I, •:.I, of dory nwc,l after Lb:,t. t.iuu• worn pruclnpl-ml by MIIRA. Gror,- all pcI-ti0r1s 11.0111 wholly unfODUtIM I charges of discrimination. NuLhing in this chapter shall !;if 1,10'. v:Illgli�, v. Northwest. Air- IOc.. App.l996. 54(i NAV._'d 43, review grant- dai,ich v. I,cisurc Hills health Center, Inc., D.Minn.1998, 25 F.Snpp.2d 953, reconsideration be interpreted as restricting the implementation of positive action programs to combat aflir,oc,l n- i)al I. reversal n, part. 558 N.W._d denial 4S F.Supp.'2d 885. discrimination. l:mpklyee's negligent supervision claim was Subd. 2. The opportunity to obtain employment, housing, and other real estate, and full .aw has u'adiLionally imposed on common cam- 1711'ecmpLed by Minnesota Hunan Rights Act and equal utilization of puhli�accommo ations, ublic services, and ed�ational institutions ,luty of highest degree 0f c:u•e :old foresighL f0,• (M1I RA), as alleged duty of eI I )Iuyc - to provide without such as is prohibited by this c apter is hereby recog'ntzed as ,d :r,y of its passengers consistenL with its under- reasonably safe workplace by providing employee declared to e �ap ng, and Minnesota Human Rights Act (MHRA) with processor support to accommodate her dis- _ not enacted to cut short time within which ability did not exist at common law, but was creat- Subd. 3. Tnt of human rights under the control of the commissioner of filled person muy bring action for breach of this ed by MHRA. Hoover v. Nowest Private Mortg. human rights is the successor of the state commission against discrimination as it -old common-law duty. Vaughn v. Northwest Banking, a Div. of Notwest Funding, Inc., App. existed immediately prior to July 1, 1967. lines, inc., App.1996, 5411 N.W.2d 43, review 2000, 605 N.W.2d 757, review granted, affirmed in Mild. affirmed in part, reversed in part 558 Part, reversed in hart 632 N.W.2d 534, corrected Subd. 4. If any provision of Laws 1967, chapter 897 t or the application thereof to any (I can denial of rehearing'• person or circumstances is held inv 1•d th • 1•d• d r , al,le cau:ae ,Ietea',rlmalicans olude by gone .4na�ar cal' the 00partinent of Hunan Rig-I,ls 31 cann�c ninths after charge is tiled are per se Indirial Ica respuadenl ;[fill reeplirel dismissal of y,lainL and dll,; ruling al,plics pruspCeLively to LnO:an rivill cl,ar'W!s filed with Minnescat.:, ;irloua,l of Ill,oum I11);Id.< (MMIR). Stale by uli•n � I:`;.I Im . I:r.0 i, .,...J,1•V. :,I [� 1i.. G. Arbih- at.iun (:I ;M: ;` wil.liiu MiuncsnL', Illonan RigIILv Act. 01111.A) providing that, as to acts declared unfair by MHRA, procedures provided by MHRA were exclusive, did not void arbitration provision of em- ploynu:111. ag;recst»:ul, while employee's claim for inarkal status discrimination was pending against furinur WIT10 Ul'. Cowell V. Distinctive: Dental ,Services, P.A., App.1999, 59.1 N.W.2d `2`2'2, review I•,r :ua, ,1, rrvrr : :r,1 G07 N.W.:!,I 1 to. .I f 5. , Iteferral Lo lac.ai canlnissitA ,vhetheyy of not a charge has 1� en tiles ode t,i: pter may refer a I[,,. i, , 111•; ulvinl; rli!;(:t•imin :tt,jEm her•.at.lse of race. color, 1 J(f,ion se�x�: •e d 'llilI marital witl', r, :f :cad to pt[I,lir assistatrcc, n:I iol•,1 ui;.,it1, aKc, sMxual.o ntation, car- dial In a Ir,I ",II volunlis,inn for mild f :111(1 rte , t.. t I,i1n rc l',v,• :i1 b�+ ihr runw,issiunl•r, Inral rnnuni::xiuu sl I m:11u• :, rM11url, and make. )CP a t , e tnva t rty oes not affect. the ot.her provisions or applications of Laws 1967, chapter 897 which can be given effect without the invalid provision or applival.ion, and tat I.hix cod Lhc prervisi0us of Laws 1!J167, chapter 897 arc severable. Amended by Laws 1993, c. 22, § 19. I Laws 1967, c. 897 amended H 363.01, 363.02, 363.03, 363.04, 363.05, 363.06, 363.10, and 36:1.12, ,enacted H 363.071, 363. 072, 3113.091, 363.116, 363.116, 363.121, and 363.122, and repealed H 363.01, subd. 11, 363.07, 363.08, and 363.09. Ili,turiaal and titnt.utol ;y Note.,; 1993 Legislation The 1993 amendment in Subd. 1 included the references to sexual orientation throughout. Law Review and Journal Commentaries Mnrilal sl. :llis disc- rin,tnal.iou: PoIllir xrorn nl' Ki,....... . �:,,,,,• r ,,,•.. Ir, ru X •,.i :.... I f REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: Steven Lillehaug, P.E. Engineer Date: ,Traffic August 17, 2004 Subject: Traffic Safety Staff Review for August 5, 2004 Agenda Item # V. A. Consent - ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ® Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ® Discussion Recommendation: Review and approve Traffic Safety Staff Review of Tuesday, August 5, 2004. Info /Background: It is anticipated that Residents may be in attendance at the Council meeting regarding the following issues: • Section 8.2. Request to install STOP signs on West 56th Street at Woodland Circle (west) and /or Park Place. • Section 6.3. Request to install a STOP sign on eastbound Hibiscus Avenue at West Shore Drive. • Section 13.4. Request to install STOP signs (all -way stop) at the intersection of South Knoll Drive with View Lane. • Section 13.8 Request for an all -way STOP at the intersection of Woodland Road West with St. Johns Avenue and Fairfax Avenue. 0 0 TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW Thursday — August 5.2004 The staff review of traffic safety matters occurred on August 5, 2004. Staff present included the City Engineer, Traffic Engineer, City Planner, Sign Coordinator, Police Chief and the Traffic Safety Sergeant. From that review, the below recommendations are provided. On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and the staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They have also been informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, they can be included on the August 17, 2004 Council Agenda. SECTION A: Requests on which staff recommends approval: Request to provide additional warning signage and better delineation of the crosswalk on Gleason Road at Indian Hills Pass adjacent to the Creek Valley School. (Continued for further review from July 2004.) The requestor is a resident on Cherokee Trail and is concerned with the safety of pedestrians crossing Gleason Roadway at the marked crosswalk. The requestor has indicated that drivers of vehicles are not stopping for pedestrians in the crosswalk and are unduly delaying pedestrians attempting to cross the roadway. The crosswalk is located on Gleason Road at the intersection with Indian Hills Pass and is located adjacent to Creek Valley School. STOP signs are located on Indian Hills Pass and at the adjacent entrance to the school. Gleason Road is classified as a B -Minor Arterial roadway and the speed limit is posted at 30 mph. In October 2000 a traffic survey was performed on Gleason Road. The Monday through Friday average daily traffic was 5801 vehicles and the 85th- percentile speed was 38.6 miles per hour. Due to the high 85th- percentile speed relative to the posted speed at the crosswalk location, staff recommends remedial measures to include scheduling the placement of the speed display trailer in this area and trimming trees that are currently obstructing the pedestrian crossing advisory signs. This section of roadway is also scheduled to be milled and overlayed as part of the Capital Improvements Program this summer, which includes repainting the crosswalk markings. Due to the location of the crosswalk adjacent to the school and park and the high speeds experienced on Gleason Road, City staff also recommends installing temporary portable crosswalk safety signs prior to the start of school to help raise the awareness of the crosswalk and awareness of the state statute requiring Traffic Safety Staff Review Page 1 of 10 August 5, 2004 vehicles to stop for pedestrians in the crosswalk. These signs are currently used on West 50th Street between Halifax Avenue and France Avenue. The portable signs are temporary and may be removed at a later date if warranted including removal during the winter months due to maintenance issues. Staff recommends approval to install temporary portable crosswalk safety signs on Gleason Road for the crosswalk at Indian Hills Pass. 2. Request to restrict parking on Wooddale Avenue across the Minnehaha Bridge (south of West 50th Street). The requestor is a resident of southwest Minneapolis. The requestor has concerns with safety and the inadequate roadway width across the bridge to accommodate parking. Currently, parking is not permitted on the west side of Wooddale Avenue across the bridge but is allowed on the east side. The roadway width is 36 -ft north of the bridge, 30 -ft on the bridge and 32 -ft south of the bridge. Restricting parking has been requested in the past over the bridge but was not supported by the administrator of the adjacent church north of the bridge. The Council did not support restricting parking in these previous requests. However, current Minnesota Statute prohibits parking vehicles upon any bridge. Additionally, restricting parking on the bridge will take away only a few on- street parking spaces. Staff recommends approval to install no parking signs and restrict parking on Wooddale Avenue across the Minnehaha Bridge on both sides of the street. 3. Request to revise the existing NO PARKING zone period on Grange Road (west of City Hall) to NO PARKING at all times. , Staff is requesting and recommending revising the existing NO PARKING zone period to all time and to stripe Grange Road between Eden Avenue and West 50th Street with two northbound lanes. An all -time NO PARKING zone is needed to allow two northbound lanes. Currently, left and right turn lanes exist at the approach to West 50th Street. Striping Grange road with two northbound lanes will help better guide vehicles that are currently using the road as such. Additionally, due to the new, larger City parking lot adjacent to Grange Road, on- street parking is no longer needed and is discouraged. Staff recommends approval to restrict parking along Grange Road at all times. Traffic Safety Staff Review Page 2 of 10 August 5, 2004 SECTION B: Requests on which staff recommends denial of request: 1. Request to change YIELD signs to STOP signs on Ashcroft Lane and Garrison Lane at St. Johns Avenue or to install an all -way STOP. The requestor is a resident on Ashcroft Lane and is concerned with vehicle speeds and safety on Ashcroft Lane and Garrison Lane including St. Johns Avenue. The intersection exists with YIELD signs on Ashcroft Lane and Garrison Lane. A request was made in March 1999 to remove the YIELD signs on Ashcroft Lane and Garrison Lane and install STOP signs on St. Johns Avenue. In 1999, a traffic radar speed survey was performed on St. Johns Avenue. The 85t'- percentile speed during the peak traffic period was 32 miles per hour with no speeds recorded over 38 mph. The volume of traffic thru the intersection was 82 vehicles between 4:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m. 72% of those vehicles were on St. Johns Avenue with only 28% of the vehicles entering the intersection from Ashcroft Lane and Garrison Lane. The request was denied by the City Council at the April 1999 meeting. Currently, a traffic survey was performed in June -July 2004 on Garrison Lane and St. Johns Avenue. The Garrison Lane Monday thru Friday average daily traffic was 212 vehicles and the 85th- percentile speed was 28.1 mph. The St. Johns Avenue Monday thru Friday average daily traffic was 500 vehicles and the 85t'- percentile speed was 31.7 mph. Accident history indicates two property damage accidents (on December 7, 1994 and May 16, 2002). Both accidents involved vehicles failing to yield to vehicles on St. Johns Avenue. Yield signs are currently used on the minor side streets to assign right -of -way to the traffic. STOP signs at this location are not warranted in accordance with City policy. Stop signs are not recommended for use as speed control devices. Upon review of the existing intersection sight lines, it was determined that shrubs in the northeast quadrant of the intersection where obstructing proper vehicle sight lines. These shrubs have since been trimmed and removed. The intersection now maintains the required corner sight lines. Staff recommends maintaining the existing YIELD signs in their existing locations and denial of the request to revise and install STOP signs for lack of warrants Traffic Safety Staff Review Page 3 of 10 August 5, 2004 2. Request to install STOP signs on West 56th Street at Woodland Circle (west) and /or Park Place. Three individual requests have been received to install STOP signs along West 56th Street at Park Place and /or Woodland Circle (west). The requestors live along West 56th Street and are concerned with the volume and speeds of traffic and the safety of pedestrians on West 56th Street. The requestors feel that installation of STOP signs will help divert some of the cut - through traffic and will help slow the speeds of the vehicles traveling on West 56th Street. West 56th Street exists with east -west STOP signs at Brookview Avenue and France Avenue. The north -south side streets between Brookview Avenue and France Avenue (Park Place, Woodcrest Drive and Woodland Circle west and east) are controlled with STOP signs. Sidewalks are not present in this area. A request was made in June 1997 to install STOP signs on West 56th Street at Park- Place and in March 2001 to install STOP signs on West 56th Street at Woodland Circle. In April 2001, a traffic survey was performed on West 56th Street. The Monday thru Friday average daily traffic was 882 vehicles and the 85th- percentile speed was 32.3 mph. Of the 4410 vehicles in the survey, 31 vehicles (0.7 %) were recorded traveling at or over 40 mph. The request was denied by the City Council at the May 2001 meeting. Currently, a traffic survey was performed in June -July 2004 on West 56th Street. The Monday thru Friday average daily traffic was 981 vehicles and the 85th - percentile speed was 31.7 mgh. In summary, although the volume of vehicles increased since 2001, the 85 - percentile speed is actually lower (only 1.7 mph above the speed limit). There have been no reported accidents since 1997. Intersection sight lines were determined to be acceptable. Existing STOP signs are present at every intersection within the referenced area. Additional or mulitway STOP signs are not warranted in accordance with City policy. Engineering guidelines indicate that warranted STOP signs should be installed in a manner that minimizes the number of vehicles having to stop (the street carrying the lowest volume of traffic should be stopped). It is recommend that these guidelines be followed so that the meaning of traffic control devices is uniform throughout the City. Due to the relatively low 85th- percentile speed exceedance of the speed limit; no immediate alternative routes to divert the existing traffic that currently uses this roadway; and the adamant concerns of the applicants for the safety of the pedestrians and children in the referenced area, staff recommends installation of sidewalks along West 56th Street. Studies show that streets with sidewalks on both sides of the streets have less than half the accidents compared to streets with no sidewalks. Traffic Safety Staff Review Page 4 of 10 August 5, 2004 Additionally, due to the existing volume of traffic on this local street and the support of the neighborhood to address these issues, staff recommends referral of this issue to the Transportation Commission (upon adoption of a policy) for further consideration and implementation of possible traffic calming measures. Staff recommends maintaining the existing STOP signs in their existing locations and denial of the reauest to install STOP sians at additional locations on West 3. Request to install a STOP sign on eastbound Hibiscus Avenue at West Shore Drive. The requestor is a resident on West Shore Drive south of Hibiscus Avenue and is concerned with vehicle speeds and safety on West Shore Drive. The requestor feels that speeds are excessive for vehicles traveling eastbound on Hibiscus Avenue to southbound West Shore Drive due to the curve of the road through the intersection. The intersection is not a typical, symmetrical intersection and exists with STOP signs on West Shore Drive to define right -of -way for traffic. A traffic survey was performed in June -July 2004 on West Shore Drive (south of Hibiscus Avenue). The Monday thru Friday average daily traffic was 612 vehicles and the 85th percentile speed was 26.0 mph (southbound) and 22.4 mph (northbound). Accident history since 1997 indicates two vehicle accidents (on November 11, 1998 and October 17, 2001). Both were non -injury accidents and alcohol consumption was a factor in both accidents. Intersection sightlines were determined to be acceptable. Existing STOP signs are present on West Shore Drive. Additional or multiway STOP signs are not warranted. Staff recommends maintaining the existing STOP signs in their existing locations and denial of the request to install a STOP sign on eastbound Hibiscus Avenue at West Shore Drive for lack of warrants. 4. Request to install STOP signs (all -way stop) at the intersection of South Knoll Drive with View Lane. The requestor is a resident on South Knoll Drive (between View Lane and Blake Road) and is concerned with the volume and speeds of traffic and the safety of pedestrians on South Knoll Drive. The requestor feels that installation of an all - way stop will slow speeds of the vehicles traveling on South Knoll Drive. The existing intersection is a T- intersection with a single STOP sign on View Lane. In August 1999, a traffic survey was performed on South Knoll Drive east Traffic Safety Staff Review Page 5 of 10 August 5, 2004 of View Lane. The Monday thru Friday average daily traffic was 673 vehicles and the 85th- percentile speed was 31.6 mph. In September 2001, a traffic survey was performed on South Knoll Drive west of View Lane. The Monday thru Friday average daily traffic was 655 vehicles and the 85th- percentile speed was 34.2 mph. Currently, a traffic survey was performed in June -July 2004 on South Knoll Drive west of View Lane. The Monday thru Friday average daily traffic was 626 vehicles and the 85th- percentile speed was 34.2 mph. In summary, the volume and speeds of vehicles remained consistent since 1999. Additionally, speeds west of Valley Lane are slightly higher than they are east of the intersection — this is most likely due to the fact that the survey performed east of View Lane was fairly close to the Blake Road intersection, which is controlled by a stop sign. There have been no reported accidents at the intersection since 1997. Intersection sightlines were determined to be acceptable. The speed display trailer was scheduled for South Knoll Drive. An existing STOP sign is located on the south leg of the T- intersection. Additional or multi -way STOP signs are not warranted. Staff recommends maintaining the existing STOP sign in its existing location on View Lane and denial of the request to install an all way stop at the intersection of South Knoll Drive with View Lane for lack of warrants. 5. Request to install STOP signs at the intersection of Heatherton Trail with Mavelle Drive. The requestor is (was) a resident on Heatherton Trail (south of Mavelle Drive) and is concerned with the cut - through traffic traveling from West 70th Street to France Avenue. (The requestor has since sold his house.) The requestor feels that installations of STOP signs are needed for the safety of pedestrians and children traveling to Cornelia School and park. Mavelle Drive is an east -west road that intersects with Heatherton in two locations forming two T- intersections. STOP signs are not present at either intersection. A traffic survey was performed in June -July 2004 on Hibiscus Trail south of Mavelle Drive. The Monday thru Friday average daily traffic was 148 vehicles and the 85th- percentile speed was 19.8 mph. Accident history since1997 indicates one right -angle accident on January 22, 1997 due to snow skidding. Intersection sightlines were determined to be acceptable. Staff recommends denial of the request to install STOP signs for lack of warrants. Traffic Safety Staff Review Page 6 of 10 August 5, 2004 6. Request to raise the speed limits on Metro Boulevard and West 77th Street between Highway 100 and Parklawn Avenue. The requestor is a resident of Edina (Coventry Lane) that travels both roadways frequently and feels that these roadways should be posted higher to more closely match similar roadways in Edina and their speed limits. Metro Boulevard is four -lane roadway posted at 30 mph between West 70th Street and Edina Industrial Boulevard. A traffic survey was performed in June 2001 on Metro Boulevard north of Edina Industrial Boulevard. The Monday thru Friday 85th- percentile speed was 37.2 mph. A traffic survey was performed in July 2001 on Metro Boulevard south of West 70th Street. The Monday thru Friday 85th- percentile speed for southbound traffic was 37.6 mph and northbound traffic was 34.1 mph. Althoue engineering guidelines typically recommend posting the speed limit at the 85 - percentile speed, several horizontal curves on this roadway require advisory speeds at or below 30 mph and preclude raising the speed limit for a relatively short tangent section of roadway between the curves. West 77th Street is five -lane roadway (center lane is a continuous two -way left - turn lane) and is posted at 30 mph. A speed survey was not performed along this roadway since the reconstruction of the roadway in recent years. Although the anticipated 85th- percentile speed of vehicles is above 30 mph, it is necessary to maintain the lower speeds due to the lack of access control and the frequency of the commercial driveways along West 77th Street to provide adequate safety for vehicles turning onto West 77th Street. Additionally, it is staffs opinion that the posting of the speed limits on these roadways is adequate. Weed limit on Boulevard and West 70' Street between Highway 100 and Parklawn Aven lack of warrants and to help maintain safety within these roadway corridors. 7. Request to provide an additional crosswalk on York Avenue between Hazelton Road and Parklawn Avenue. The requestor is a resident of 7244 York Avenue South (west side) and would like consideration to add a crosswalk for better access to the YMCA building as well as bus stops, etc. along York Avenue. York Avenue exists as a four -lane divided roadway with northbound and southbound lanes separated by a large grass median. York Avenue (in 2001) had an average daily traffic volume of 16,500 vehicles and a speed limit of 35 mph. The 85'-percentile speed was determined to be somewhat closer to 40 mph. Sidewalks exist on both sides of York Avenue that extend from Hazelton Traffic Safety Staff Review Page 7 of 10 August 5, 2004 Road to West 76th Street. There are currently bus shelters located on the east of York Avenue at approximately 7210 York Avenue and on the west side at the entrance of 7200 York Avenue. Currently, crosswalks exist at Hazelton Road and Parklawn Avenue. Additionally, a tunnel exists across York Avenue approximately half way between the referenced streets and has adequate access to the sidewalk on the east side of York Avenue. Access from the tunnel to the sidewalk along the west side of York Avenue does not exist. A request was received in August 2001 for a crosswalk at 7200 York. This crosswalk was not supported by staff for several reasons. It is City policy to not locate a crosswalk on arterial roads or roads with a speed limit greater than 30 mph unless in conjunction with a signalized intersection. Additionally, York Avenue along this stretch had 16 reported accidents between January 1997 and December 2000. The County (who has jurisdiction over this roadway) was opposed to any crosswalk in this area and was in support with staffs position. The Council denied the request in October 2001. Staffs position has remained the same for this request. However, staff does support constructing a path to connect the tunnel with the sidewalk along York Avenue on the west side. Staff recommends denial of the request to install a crosswalk on York Avenue between Hazelton Road and Parklawn Avenue. 8. Request for an all -way STOP at the intersection of Woodland Road West with St. Johns Avenue and Fairfax Avenue. (Re- request in response to only installing STOP signs on Woodland Road and not on the north -south streets of St. Johns Avenue and Fairfax Avenue as directed by the Council on July 20, 2004.) The requestors live along Woodland Road and Fairfax Avenue. The requestors feel the signs are needed to control the speed and volume of traffic on Woodland Road and Fairfax Avenue due to concerns of safety for pedestrians and children in the area. Woodland Road is two blocks long and runs from Wooddale Ave. to Concord Ave. In the middle it intersects with St. Johns Avenue to the north and Fairfax Avenue to the south. No sidewalks exist along Woodland Road and there are no parking restrictions on either side of the street. Woodland Road is a wide street with typical residential neighborhood sight lines (somewhat obstructed in the southeast quadrant). There are no hidden entrances for the entire two blocks. Fairfax Avenue and St. Johns Avenue enter Woodland Road at skewed angles and carry relatively low levels of traffic. Traffic Safety Staff Review Page 8 of 10 August 5, 2004 Yield signs were installed on St. Johns Ave. and Fairfax Ave. for the purpose of defining driver's right of way in 2000. In July 2004 at the direction of the Council, the YIELD signs were removed and STOP signs were installed on Woodland Road. It should also be noted that, since this recent change of traffic control at this intersection, Wooddale Avenue (a parallel 13-minor arterial roadway with typical traffic levels of 5650 vehicles per day) has been closed due to road construction and this traffic has temporarily been detoured to France Avenue. However, neighborhoods are experiencing some of this traffic using the local streets parallel to Wooddale Avenue (e.g. St. Johns Avenue and Fairfax Avenue), which increases the traffic levels on these streets temporarily. Previous requests for STOP signs were made at this location in 1999 and 2000 The Council denied these requests. A traffic survey was performed in May of this year to compare with the June 1999 traffic survey performed in the same location. Additionally, prior to the installation of the STOP signs on Woodland Road, before installation surveys were performed mid -block on each side of St. Johns Avenue /Fairfax Avenue. After the installation of the STOP signs, another survey was performed at these same locations for comparison purposes. The following table includes the data that was collected from the referenced surveys: Please note that the apparent traffic volume irregularity in May 2004 is most likely due to performing the traffic survey while the nearby schools (Concord and Southview) were in session as compared to the surveys completed in June and July during school break. However, comparing the volumes surveyed in June 1999 and June /July 2004, the volumes have decreased by approximately 10 %. Summarizing the 85th- percentile speed data surveyed, the speeds on Woodland have also decreased since 1999. Comparing the 85th- percentile speed at the mid -block location on Woodland Road east of the intersection before and after the STOP signs were installed, the data shows that there was a slight decrease of 1.0 mph. This could be expected as this block is fairly short and does not allow a large enough distance to reasonably acquire a greater speed before having to stop at the consecutive STOP controlled intersections. Comparing the 85th- percentile speeds at the mid -block location west of the intersection before and after the STOP signs were installed, the data shows that there was a slight Traffic Safety Staff Review Page 9 of 10 August 5, 2004 JUNE 2004 JUNE 2004 JULY 2004 JULY 2004 BEFORE STOP BEFORE STOP AFTER STOP AFTER STOP JUNE 1999 MAY 2004 EAST BLOCK EST BLOCK EAST BLOCK EST BLOCK VOLUME (ADT) 429 608 392 394 373 380 85TH - PERCENTILE SPEED 32.5 30.9 31.3 31.6 30.3 31.9 Please note that the apparent traffic volume irregularity in May 2004 is most likely due to performing the traffic survey while the nearby schools (Concord and Southview) were in session as compared to the surveys completed in June and July during school break. However, comparing the volumes surveyed in June 1999 and June /July 2004, the volumes have decreased by approximately 10 %. Summarizing the 85th- percentile speed data surveyed, the speeds on Woodland have also decreased since 1999. Comparing the 85th- percentile speed at the mid -block location on Woodland Road east of the intersection before and after the STOP signs were installed, the data shows that there was a slight decrease of 1.0 mph. This could be expected as this block is fairly short and does not allow a large enough distance to reasonably acquire a greater speed before having to stop at the consecutive STOP controlled intersections. Comparing the 85th- percentile speeds at the mid -block location west of the intersection before and after the STOP signs were installed, the data shows that there was a slight Traffic Safety Staff Review Page 9 of 10 August 5, 2004 increase of 0.3 mph and indicates that the installation of STOP signs did not decrease the speeds at this location. The west block is longer than the east block allowing for a greater acceleration length. There has been one accident recorded at this intersection since January 1997 that occurred on November 11, 1999. A vehicle westbound on Woodland Rd. W. collided with a vehicle southbound on St. Johns Ave. Yield signs were previously used on the minor side streets to assign right -of -way to the traffic. STOP signs are not warranted in accordance with City policy. Due to the relatively low 85th- percentile speed exceedance of the speed limit; no immediate alternative routes to divert the existing traffic that currently uses this roadway; and the adamant concerns of the applicants for the safety of the pedestrians and children in the referenced area, staff recommends installation of sidewalks along Woodland Road to connect to the sidewalk currently being constructed along Wooddale Avenue and to the School. Studies show that streets with sidewalks on both sides of the streets have less than half the accidents compared to streets with no sidewalks. Staff recommends denial of the request to install an all -way STOP at the intersection of Woodland Road with St. Johns Avenue and Fairfax Avenue due to lack of warrants. Staff also recommends removing the STOP signs on Woodland Road and installing YIELD signs on St. Johns Avenue and Fairfax to remain consistent with engineering guidelines, policies and warrants. SECTION C: Requests that are deferred to a later date or referred to others: 1. Request to install portable crosswalk safety signs in the middle of Cahill Road at the crosswalk north of Amundson Avenue has been continued for further staff review and recommendation. Staff will be studying this crosswalk location to determine if warrants are met for additional crosswalk delineation (e.g. pedestal mounted flasher). 2. Request to revise City Ordinance No. 1400.10 Parking, Stopping, Standing and Loading from the six consecutive hour parking regulation to a twelve consecutive hour parking period has been continued for further staff review and recommendation. Traffic Safety Staff Review Page 10 of 10 August 5, 2004 e tA O MULTIWAY STOP SIGNS • H � •, M,� "�:�y TRAFFIC POLICY ,see MMI City of Edina PURPOSE: The purpose of the multiway stop sign policy is to provide fair and uniform treatment of all requests for multiway, all way, and 4 -way stop signs. Multiway stop signs can be an effective safety measure if properly warranted. However, they should not be installed inappropriately where they may be ignored by drivers, needlessly interrupt traffic flow, and negatively affect fuel consumption, the environment, or cause needless noise. A consistent application of the policy serves both the motorist and resident within the City. PROCESS: Your traffic safety concern or request will be formalized by the staff member you have contacted. That person will work with you and gather the pertinent facts and help clearly define the problem and seek a solution. Those facts will be reviewed by the City Engineer, the Police Chief, and the Assistant City Manager. That group will make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the matter. The staff safety review recommendation will be shared with you. If you disagree with the recommendation or can bring forth additional information and /or facts that are persuasive as related to the City warrants /policies for the requested issue, you can appear at the second Council meeting of the month and present your viewpoint. We suggest you alert any interested parties to attend the meeting with you. In all cases the City Council is the final authority on traffic safety matters. Any subsequent review of the same or similar request is at the discretion of the City Council. POLICY: 1. The provisions of the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) shall be followed. 2. Relevant speed, volumes, accident records and sight obstructions shall be reviewed when considering the installation of a stop sign. 3. Absent engineering data which clearly indicates the need for a multiway stop sign, control devices at an intersection will remain unchanged. 4. Any of the following conditions may warrant a multiway stop sign installation: MULTIWAY STOP SIGN POLICY (CONTINUED) a. Where traffic signals are warranted and urgently needed, the multiway stop is an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the signal installation. b. An accident problem, as indicated by five or more reported accidents of a type susceptible of correction by a multiway stop installation in a 12 -month period. Such accidents include right- and left -turn collisions as well as right angle collisions. C. Minimum traffic volumes: 1. The total vehicular volume entering the intersection from all approaches must average at least 500 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average day, and 2. The combined vehicular and pedestrian volume from the minor street or highway must average at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the maximum hours, but 3. When the 85- percentile approach speed of the major street traffic exceeds 40 miles per hour, the minimum vehicular volume warrant is 70 percent of the above requirements. 4. Multiway stop signs shall not be installed in an attempt to control speed. 5. Multiway stop signs shall not be installed in an attempt to control volume. wq ,rte RESIDENTIAL STOP o e y SIGNS STOP lPos TRAFFIC POLICY City of Edina PURPOSE: The purpose of the residential stop sign policy is to provide fair and uniform treatment of all requests for stop signs in residential areas. A consistent application of the policy serves both the motorist and resident within the City. PROCESS: Your traffic safety concern or request will be formalized by the staff member you have contacted. That person will work with you and gather the pertinent facts and help clearly define the problem and seek a solution. Those facts will be reviewed by the City Engineer, the Police Chief, and the Assistant City Manager. That group will make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the matter. The staff safety review recommendation will be shared with you. If you disagree with the recommendation or can bring forth additional information and /or facts that are persuasive as related to the City warrants /policies for the requested issue, you can appear at the second Council meeting of the month and present your viewpoint. We suggest you alert any interested parties to attend the meeting with you. In all cases the City Council is the final authority on traffic safety matters. Any subsequent review of the same or similar request is at the discretion of the City Council. POLICY: 1. The provisions of the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) shall be followed. 2. Relevant speed, volumes, accident records and sight obstructions shall be reviewed when considering the installation of a stop sign. 3. Absent engineering data which clearly indicates the need for a stop sign, a residential intersection should be left uncontrolled. 4. If an intersection experiences five (5) or more right angle accidents in a three (3) year period, stop signs should be considered. 5. If the presence of a sight obstruction is contributing to accidents at an intersection, removal of the sight obstruction should be sought before considering a stop sign. RESIDENTIAL STOP SIGN POLICY (Continued) 6. If the 85th percentile speed on any leg of an intersection is more than five (5) MPH over the posted speed limit, a stop sign should be considered for the intersecting street. 7. If traffic volumes exceed 1,000 vehicles per day on each of the intersecting streets, stop signs should be considered. 8. Residential stop signs shall not be installed in an attempt to control speed. 9. Residential stop signs shall not be installed in an attempt to control volume. From: Wayne Carlson [waynecarlson@popp.net] Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2004 10:25 PM To: Steve Lillehaug Subject: speed limits Steve, I live on Coventry lane in Edina and work on 7400 Metro Blvd. I have been stopped twice in the last 4 years on W 78th Street between Parklawn and Normandale Blvd. These are the only tickets in that period even though I drive considerable miles as a real estate broker. On Memorial day week end I traveled W 78th 6 times and every time the Edina Police had someone pulled over. They also spend a lot of time on Metro Blvd with their speed traps. W78th Street has only two speed limit signs at 30 Miles per hour but has every light pole cluttered with no parking signs. This is a 5 lane road. Metro Boulevard is a 30 mile road with 4 lanes. 70th Street is 30 miles per hour through a residential area with 2 lanes. France Avenue is 40 miles per hour in Edina and 35 miles north of 62. This compares with 66th street through Richfield, 4 lanes at 35 miles per hour, The frontage roads of 494 in Bloomington at 35 miles an hour for two lanes. These arbitrary differences place the residents of Edina at a very costly disadvantage. It certainly appears as a technique to have the Edina police be very successful at issuing tickets. If the city firmly believes that it is necessary to keep these speed limits then it would seem that these areas should be as vigorously posted with the speed limit signs as with no parking signs. I would appreciate the city becoming consistent with other cities or posting these streets very aggressively. Sincerely, Wayne Carlson NANCY DALASKA 5705 FAIRFAX AVENUE SOUTH EDINA, MN 55424 (952)922 -2165 NDALASKAg4 MN.RR.COM August 11, 2004 Mr. Steve Lillehaug Assistant City Engineer & Traffic Engineer City of Edina 4801 West 5& Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Lillehaug: I am writing with regard to the 2 -way (east -west) stop signs that were installed at the intersection of West Woodland Road and Fairfax Avenue as authorized in the June 15, 2004 Edina City Council meeting. Attached please find a petition signed by the residents of the 5700 block of Fairfax Avenue requesting the addition of 2 -way (north - south) stop signs at that same intersection. This petition should be considered a supplement to the petition presented at the June 15, 2004 meeting requesting a 4 -way stop sign at that intersection. The addition of 2 -way east -west stop signs on West Woodland Road has had a negative impact on the traffic on Fairfax Avenue. In reviewing the minutes of the June 15'b meeting, it appears that the City Council intended to slow down traffic on West Woodland Road. It certainly could not have been their intent to speed up traffic on Fairfax Avenue. Unfortunately, the latter has come to pass and has now made Fairfax Avenue a more hazardous roadway. The issue is as follows: a. Prior to the new Woodland Rd stop sign, vehicles on Fairfax had to slow down at Woodland Rd as the view of the intersection is obstructed. b. With the installation of the new east -west stop sign, vehicles now speed through without slowing down. There has been a dramatic increase in the speed of vehicles on the 5700 block of Fairfax Avenue. c. There are no stop signs from Golf Terrace to 58th St. thereby allowing vehicles to maintain their speed for 6 blocks. d. The 5700 block of Fairfax Avenue is an irregular street in that it is curved. You can not see one end of the street while standing at the other end. The view of half of the block is obstructed due to the curve. A driver speeding on either end can not see another car, pedestrian, child playing, etc... until they go around the curve. e. Fairfax was not intended as a high traffic street. You have different classifications for streets and Fairfax was not intended to be a major thoroughfare. f. The City of Edina Traffic Department advised us that when 2 -way stop signs are added to an intersection, they are generally added to the less - traveled roadway. Contrary to this practice, the new stop signs were added to the busier street. g. There are 19 children residing on the 5700 block of Fairfax Avenue. In summary, the residents of Fairfax Avenue, West Woodland Road and St. John's Avenue have all requested (as evidenced in two petitions) that the City of Edina install a 4 -way stop sign at the intersection of Fairfax Avenue and West Woodland Road. By partially granting this request, the City has actually made the situation worse. We ask that you grant the request to add north -south stop signs to this intersection to resolve the issue for the wellbeing of residents, pedestrians and vehicles on Fairfax Avenue. I believe that this matter is scheduled for discussion on the agenda for the August 17, 2004 City Council Meeting. If you have any questions or comments prior to the meeting, please feel free to contact me at 952- 922 -2165 or John or Meg Ellefson at 952- 920 -8341. Thank you for your consideration of this request. Sincerely, ku4k Nancy Dalaska Enclosure A.1 �. The City Council City of Edina Petition 1 7 Petition Instructions This petition form is to be used to ask the Edina City Council to consider the following types of improvements: SIDEWALK ALLEY PAVING WATER MAIN STORM SEWER PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER CURB AND GUTTER ONLY (WITHOUT PERMANENT STREET SURFACING) SANITARY SEWER STREET LIGHTING or another improvement you describe (called OTHER on this form). You may use another petition form if you wish but the city council may reject such petitions unless they contain the following information: 1. Type of improvement(s) requested, e.g., SIDEWALK, STORM SEWER, WATER MAIN, etc. 2. Precise location(s) of the requested improvements 3. A statement that all who sign the petition understand that the city council may assess the costs of these improvements against the proper- ties benefiting from the improvements in amounts determined by the council 4. Printed name of property owner, owner's signature and phone num- ber, and property address 5. Signature of person circulating the petition If you have questions, please call the City Clerk at 927 -8861 between 8:OOAM and 4:30PM. DEBRA MANGEN CITY CLERK o e City of Edina, Minnesota DATE: CITY COUNCIL 8k [O ` 0q 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 (612) 92741861 • (612) 927 -7645 -FAX a (612) 927 - 5461 -TDD PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL ❑ SIDEWALK ❑ ALLEY PAVING ❑ WATERMAIN ❑ STORM SEWER ❑ SANITARY SEWER ❑ STREET LIGHTING ❑ CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ❑ PERMANENT STREET OTHER: SURFACING WITH Z - w! s CURB AND GUTTER 4n" 0 To the Mayor and City Council: The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the locations listed below. cm of- ;:iX1Y fa)' Avcvc we w 0 d between and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS between and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS between and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS between and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE EUPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE OWNER'S NAME (PRINTED) PAi WIt DrkuAsK A- -nob-a- 0 54 �+- PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNER'S PHONE 5I-CSVA(KF" A-Lr--S q'SZ- ci2.2 -z1(QS 5-r6s Pad t ✓-rx-x Ay. s 95Z- ti Lt - z l bs 57dS rA lzaAK Awu, $P-5-2z - ai,- - This petition was circulated by: Liu )�(A,0-c.16.rj s1-os - alrfax s �SZ -aZ z • Z r NAME ADDRESS PHONE There is space for more signatures on the back or you may attach extra pages. SB7rEMBM,M PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNER'S SIGNATURE (PRINTED) PHONE ' moll, / i ro a•I 5ioS fe't faX �R5Z/ 9ZS -58'38 S7Z�{ I�Ayergx Ave 5 7 17..�L� ,✓. S7l 1 a Siys �4i�tFp ?0 5- 401 d 10& , 95Z- 9ZZ- S1�(o c15�2 X22 51°1 � a gly sa a /- v.3 We, the residents of the following neighborhood in Edina hereby petition to add a 4-way stop to the intersections of West Woodland Road, Fairfax and Saint John's Avenues. g� Address Phone NumbW / /' Ed• -i4/ MN s�YY J �'V I - p c ig •I L 13 as 9S a - t27 -57,66 ecL 9Sa . %*-D . 06 qb o 9 W . K -J-Dd- LA- , 44 W Wo d ,q ?a 1.7 5 -- 1 We. the residents of the following neighborhood in Edina hereby petition to add a 4-way stop to the intersections of West Woodland Road. Fairfax and Saint John's Avenues. Signawn Address Phone Number #ho UJ40YL 4524 W. WOQdl"4( q5Z •X120• $ na4 S -f r. Ave- 9:5 - - q :;L-5 -loo PI-VO-4, LI air 5-70/ 'Cllr AY �- cJ�-2 - y 2 2 - 06 /.:3 t U` S-/a aP6 Al� 9S,11- q a).a h,---j -c - 7Sl L 1� -P.�v � � �� 3 3 S �• a"' �-- /ice 95 i - rJ• '� � -- y'S° / ON l C We, the residents of the following neighborhood in Edina hereby petition to add a 4-my stop to the !-A- of West Woodland (toad, Faidlax and Saint John's Avenues. ti , wimal"! vow, I ie wt, dw • - ,� -LOT-MM- •r _ ti of Vu �Aroa►`��'9 . eee o U REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor Maetzold and members of. Agenda Item V.B ° the Edina City Counc' . From: John Keprios, Direct r Consent ❑ Park & Recreation Depa en Information Only El Date: August 17, 2004 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA To Council . Subject: Tobacco -Free Park Policy ❑ Motion r ❑Resolution ❑ Ordinance ® Discussion RECOMMENDATION: The Edina Park Board recommends that the City. Council adopt a policy that there be no smoking during athletic events and that smoking.not be permitted in front of the entrance- A to Braemar Arena; however, designate a smoking area away from the front entrance at Braemar Arena. INFO /BACKGROUND: As reflected in the May 2004 Park Board minutes, Kathy Iverson, Chemical Health Coordinator for the .City of Edina and Shirley Hunt Alexander, member of the Chemical. Health Partnership of Edina appeared at the Park Board meeting to present the concept of tobacco free parks. They also asked to be given an opportunity to give a presentation at the Park Board's June meeting on the recommendation, which was welcomed by the Park. . Board. 2 At the June 2004 Park Board meeting, over 20 concerned residents attended the meeting to, show their support for tobacco free parks. As reflected in the Park Board minutes, numerous concerned residents (adults and youth) gave presentations and testimony about their support for tobacco free parks. After extensive discussion and debate, the Park Board unanimously passed two motions at their June meeting: 1. To adopt a policy (not an ordinance) that makes all athletic events (which includes scheduled games only; not practices or scrimmages) in the parks tobacco free. 2. To adopt a policy (not an ordinance) that bans smoking in front of the entrance to Braemar Arena; however, designate a smoking area away from the front entrance at Braemar Arena. At the August 2004 Park Board meeting, the Park Board reopened discussion on their original proposal and voted unanimously to accept staff's recommendation to amend.the policy to define athletic events to include.all scheduled'games, scrimmages, and practices. The policy being recommended by the Park Board would rely on voluntary compliance; not an ordinance to be enforced. As reflected in the Park Board minutes, separate. motions were made to ban smoking at playground areas, the Centennial Lakes amphitheater, the pathways at Rosland Park and Bredesen Park; and at �Rosland Park during the 4`h of July fireworks display. All of those separate motions were either defeated or died due to a lack of a second.. The proponents of tobacco free parks see this as primarily a public health issue for both smokers and non - smokers. A tobacco free park policy promotes the message that tobacco use is unhealthy and unnecessary behavior for children, promotes healthy lifestyle choices, reduces litter, .plus reduces the health hazards of second -hand smoke. ' The opponents of tobacco free parks have expressed concerns about government limiting what' is currently a legal activity in outdoor park settings. There were concerns expressed. that it does not make sense to create more rules that cannot be enforced. Some expressed a concern about legislating behaviors in an outdoor park setting. There, are currently 44 cities in Minnesota that have adopted tobacco free park policies. Most cities have voluntary compliance policies; whereas, some cities have adopted tobacco free park ordinances. If approved by the City Council, it is staff's intention to post signs at the designated athletic event outdoor park locations and Braemar Arena. Darlene Wallin From: Jennifer Bennerotte Sent: Monday, August 09, 2004 7:38 AM To: Darlene Wallin Subject: FW: Smoking in bars and restaurants - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Deanna Weeks [mailto:deanna @tomprin.com] Sent: Friday, August 06, 2004 7:01 PM To: Jennifer Bennerotte Subject: Smoking in bars and restaurants I would like to see all public buildings, restaurants and bars, and city parks non - smoking. Edina has let Bloomington take the lead on this issue and we seem to be playing catch -up. I was glad to see in the Sun - Current that this would be addressed but cigarette smoking should have been banned a couple of years ago. A person's right to smoke extends only as far as a non - smoker's right to breathe clean air. Second hand smoke is as bad as smoking itself and the public and employees should not be exposed. Deanna Weeks 4928 Ridge Road Edina, MN 1 As citizens of Edina, we are asking the Edina City Council to consider a comprehensive tobacoo-free policy for the city's outdoor recreational facilities for the following reasons: *The Edina Park and Recreation Department has a responsibility to protect the health and safety of our community's children and adults while they use the city's recreation facilities, and adopting a tobacco -free policy is part of this responsibility. "Children and adults using city recreational facilities should not be exposed to the deadly effects of secondhand smoke and cigarette butts that are present in these areas. "Secondhand smoke is harmful in both indoor and outdoor settings. Exposure to secondhand smoke is the third leading cause of preventable death in the United States. `By having policies, we can ensure that coaches, parents and other role models do not use tobacco in recreational settings, sending our children the message that tobacco use is an unhealthy behavior. Proposed Tobacco-Free Facilities All playgrounds, youth athletic fieldstcourtsMnks/parks (softball, baseball, soccer, hockey, tennis, basketball, football, skateboard, etc.) Rosland Park fishing pier Entrances to Braemar Arena (building is already tobacco free) Braemar Goff Courses, Fred Richards Executive Golf Course, Centennial Lakes Arneson Acres, City -owned walking trails (Lake Cornelia, and Bredeson Park) Proposed Policy Enforcement Plan In order to most effectively educate the community about this policy and ensure compliance, we request consideration of the following enforcement plan: 1. Appropriate signs as directed by the Park and Recreation Director shall be posted in the above specified areas. 2. The community, especially facility users and staff, will be notified about this policy (policy manual, newsletter, pledges). 3. Park and Recreation staff will make periodic observations of recreational facilities to monitor for compliance. 4. Any person found violating this policy may be subject to immediate ejection from the recreation facility for the remainder of the event. (Please see other side for endorsements of this policy) Endorsements for A Comprehensive Tobacco Free Parks Policy for Edina (see other side) American Heart Association American Lung Association American Medical Association Clean Air For Edina Edina Chemical Heatlh Partners League of Women Voters of Edina Minnesota Medical Association Minnesota Women Physicians Association 08 -16 -2004 OT:42 From- UNMRSITY OF MYN ESOTA T -696 P.002/002 F -139 AGENDA ITEM V.B. 1300 S 3'' Sae$b�l"0,.,7F l-c•H lrd Mirrnealwlis, MN 55455.1015 Tel: 612 -624 -1818 Facer 612.624.01915 August 16, 2004 B409. hLrm2mummeh Mayor Dennis Matzold 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Matzold: As an Edina resident, I am gratified that our City is now considering improving its commitment to rho health of its citizens by restricting smoking in our public parks. 'lire sdcudfic evidences Pow ar amb' illness. ous non - demonstrates that exposure w environmental smoke increases respiratory acute i smoking youth, exposure to environmental smoke commutes to lung disease (asthma, resp rY infections, and lung function loss) and middle ear disease. Adults exposed to environmental smoke suffer increased rates ofthese respiratory illnesses, as well as cardiovascular disease and lung cancer. As the City considers the use of tobacco in our parks, please note that it may be appropriate to question the use of the term "second hand" smoke. This phrase lessens the tangible effect of such smoke exposure on health. Consider smoke to have an knpaat no differew from other illnesses in which there is transnusslon of a health danger from one individual to another. In this contcx% we would never ascribe public exposure to transmissible infectious disease (eg., by exposure to tuberculosis in a public park grandstand or to infectious illness at a public swimming pool, etc) as mere " second hand" exposures. Our coninihment to public health would always, and without hesitation, limit such exposures in the public environmez& As a cardiovascular physician, I am proud of public efforts we tape to maintain health of our families and communities. Nevertheless, we cannot be proud that our state has the second highest rate of teen smoking in the country. Evidence demonstrates that addiction to tobacco invariably occurs in our youth before age 14. The future health of our citizens is dependent on robust efforts to diminish smoking in our youth. Parks exist to offer our youth an outdoor environment to enjoy activities that promote health. Tobacco, in commst, is addictive, toxic, and deadly. As such, it has no role in our parks or public spaces. Restriction of smoking in parks is simply concordant with the public restrictions we place on public use of other addictive and deadly substances in our parks. In summary, from my professional perspective, I am canUent that scientific data now relate smoking in public spaces to a definable health risk As an Edina resident, I believe that our public parks must reflect our commitment to the health of all park users, and especially our children. I urge the City to proudly create smoke -free Edina parks. Sincerely yours, �� n Akan T. Hirsch, M.D. Associate Professor of Epidemiology University of Minnesota School of Public Health Director, Vascular Medicine program, Minneapolis Heart Instib= Abbott Northwesterds Vascular Center 920 East 28th Street. Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55407 Cc: Alice Hulbert Mr. James Hovland City Councilman Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Hovland, August 12, 2004 It has been brought to my attention that there are some people who desire to ban smoking on the golf course, and probably other public recreational areas. I am a cigar puffer and enjoy a good cigar while playing the courses around here, in particular, Braemar. My group of 26 Sandbaggers has played Braemar for 24 years. We have a few smokers in the group and no one complains. In fact, I have not heard any complaints about smoking on the course from anyone, even non - smokers over the years. If some are concerned about "pollution" then they should be more concerned about exhaust emission from automobiles, jet planes, large vehicles and industrial furnaces. These are more dangerous than "second hand" smoke from a few golfers on the course. If they are concerned about "bad images for kids ", then maybe they should have a policy outlawing /banning multiple earrings and pierced tongues, low, low mini - skirts, hip huggers, tattoos and require that children not watch TV, DVDs and movies that feature all the above, including smoking. The non - smokers cause is just and we all should quit, I agree, However, I do not believe in legislating it's eradication, especially in outdoor open air venues because of a feeling that "it doesn't look good" These are my thoughts and hope that you will share these with others. Tass von Schmidt -Pauli Concerned Citizen of Edina Page 1 of 1 Darlene Wallin From: Jennifer Bennerotte Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 9:19 AM To: Darlene Wallin Cc: Gordon Hughes Subject: FW: smoke -free parks? From: Steve Fusselman [mailto:stevef @osas.com] Sent: Tue 8/17/2004 8:49 AM To: Jennifer Bennerotte Subject: smoke -free parks? Dear Edina City Council Members, I SUPPORT your efforts to provide smoke -free parks to your citizens. You may save several lives! Someone with asthma CAN DIE from at asthmatic attack triggered by secondhand smoke. Small children and the elderly are also greatly affected by secondhand smoke. Under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), it's also ILLEGAL to deny public services to citizens based on health issues regarding major life functions (e.g., breathing). It's a rights issue! Many people, especially those of us with respiratory health problems, can't tolerate secondhand smoke. We therefore avoid places such as Edina parks where smoking is permitted. But it's against our rights to be forced out of those areas. No one has a right to physically abuse us with their secondhand smoke. No one has the right to poison us with their addiction. Smokers' so- called rights stop at our noses. I waited many, many years for Eden Prairie parks to prohibit smoking. Now I can take my kids to the park. Now I can participate in musicals and other events at the amphitheater. Smokers can still do the same things, only they should not be allowed to harm others while they do it. We already prohibit many other unsafe actions in city parks (shooting guns, driving ATVs, burning hazardous chemicals, assaulting others, etc.), and banning smoking will be a welcome improvement in at least two of those categories! When it comes to enforcement, 95% of smokers will obey. The other 5% must be dealt with. Please enforce your ordinance. Although a warning might be okay for a first offense, please increase the fine for repeat offenders ($25, $100, etc.). Use the money you raise to pay for enforcement and "NO SMOKING" signs you post at park entrances and wherever smokers need reminders. Thank you for making Edina parks tolerable! Steve Fusselman 8/17/2004 0 IL11NMI w°Itb a REPORURECOMMENDATION To: Mayor Maetzold a4Depa ers of the Edina City Cou From: John Keprios, Dire Park & Recreation en Date: Augu st 17, 2004 Subject: Braemar Athletic Field Facility - Proposal. Agenda Item V.0 Consent 'El Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA To Council G ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution El- Ordinance . ® Discussion RECOMMENDATION: The Edina Park Board recommends that the.City Council approve the concept of developing a permanent structure over the Braemar athletic field under the premise that user groups fund 50% of the construction costs plus an additional $500,000 to cover operational expenses that exceed revenues. INFO/BACKGROUND: Edina youth athletic association presidents were invited to attend the May 11, 2004, Park Board meeting to discuss the, . concept of developing an indoor athletic field facility in Edina. Those who attended included Richard Olson (Edina Soccer Association); Greg Ettinger (Edina Football Association); Doug Nessan (Edina Football Association); John Ratelle (Edina Baseball Association); Dick Ward (Edina Basketball'Association); Bill Sierks (Edina Girls Basketball); Mark Copman (Edina Soccer Club);,and Paul Ferry (Edina Lacrosse Association). It was determined that there is a strong desire for an indoor athletic facility, which will not diminish in the foreseeable future. The issues discussed centered primarily 0 around location of such a facility, the size and type of facility needed, who would pay to construct the facility, and who would operate the facility. After lengthy discussion, the Park Board asked staff to revisit all possible alternatives to construct an indoor field facility in a park location and make a recommendation for Park Board's consideration at their June meeting. Staff recommended. that the only suitable park location for an indoor athletic field facility would be the Braemar athletic field located adjacent to Braemar East Arena. Staff further pointed out that there are two options for an indoor athletic field facility at the Braemar Park site: 1. 66 yard X 120 yard field with an inflatable structure (dome/bubble) at a cost of approximately $3 million. 2. 80 yard X 120 yard field with a permanent. building structure with moveable walls at a cost of approximately $5 million. A permanent building has the advantage of avoiding set -up, takedown, and storage costs associated with an inflatable structure. The life of a permanent building would be . significantly greater than a fabric facility. It would be less expensive to heat a well - insulated permanent building, plus it would not require constant air movement to keep the structure inflated. A permanent building would allow for a larger indoor athletic field for two reasons: 1. A permanent building would have a built -in fire suppression system and therefore would not require room for an access road around the structure. 2. A permanent building would have vertical walls; as opposed to angled walls that allow for more useable play space. Staff pointed out that the down side is that a permanent structure is significantly more expensive to build but would have long -term operational savings. Staff also suggested that the other significant negative is the change in aesthetics to the park in general. As shown in the June 8, 2004, Park Board minutes, the Park Board recommends that a „ permanent structure, as opposed to an inflatable structure, should be built at the Braemar athletic field site. The Park Board further recommends that the user groups fund 50% of the construction costs plus. an additional $500,000 to cover operational expenses that exceed revenues. If the City Council approves the Park Board's concept recommendation, staff would recommend that the next step would be to determine the user groups' level of interest and commitment in raising the amount of funding required as per the Park Board's a recommendation. If the user groups demonstrate a desire -and willingness to support this recommendation, then staff would recommend that the Council authorize funding to' hire consultants needed to draw up preliminary designs and provide more definitive cost estimates for both construction and operational expenses. August 17. 2004 To: Mayor Dennis Maetzold Scot Housh Mike Kelly Jim Hovland Linda Masica From: Dick Ward, President Edina Basketball Association Re: Park & Rec recommendation re: facilities Members of the Edina City Council: Please accept my apologies for not being available tonight to provide you feedback on this important matter. I have a prior business commitment that does not allow me to be there. I was advised by mail on Friday August 13 of this recommendation and discussion and, quite frankly, a notice of two business days to attend a meeting is insufficient. Nevertheless, please know the position of EBA on this matter. We were asked to attend a Park Board meeting in May with all of the other sports association heads. The topic was once again our interest in new and expanded facilities, particularly gyms and indoor field space. The meeting was well attended and the feedback the Park board received from other users (Edina Girls Basketball, Edina Soccer, Edina Baseball, etc.) and me was consistent with past feedback. Simply stated, we all agree that we need more and better facilities in this community. The Park Board heard our voices and determined they would take action at their next meeting. What that action is, apparently, is a proposal to build a permanent indoor field facility. I do not believe this proposal contemplates any gym space. Problem number 1. More significantly, the Park board proposal suggests that our youth associations should raise much of the capital to build such a facility. Setting aside the costs of operations, I cannot imagine how any of our youth groups could be called upon to pay for a City owned facility that all residents would have use of and access to. Problem number 2. I believe your Park Board is out of touch with the reality of the situation and, more disturbingly, unwilling to look for the workable solutions. I would encourage your Council discussion to recognize this recommendation for what is; another excuse for nothing to be done. If you are willing to take public feedback at another meeting, I am happy to make arrangements to attend. Otherwise, I can be reached at wont (612 - 376 -4159) or home (952- 942 -5523) or email rward I (a)lmn.rr.com Thank you for your consideration of these comments. Cc: Gordon Hughes f-4 01 REPORURECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item V.D. From: ERIC ANDERSON Consent El ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER Information Only ❑ Date: AUGUST 17, 2004 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: ENDORSEMENT OF ® Motion APPOINTMENT TO ❑ Resolutiou NINE -MILE CREEK ❑ Ordinance WATERSHED DISTRICT ❑ Discussion INFORMATIONBACKGROUND: Attached, please find correspondence from Mr. Geoffrey H. Nash, 6920 Hillcrest Lane, asking Council endorsement of his appointment to fill a vacancy on the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Board of Managers. n Geoffrey H. Nash 6920 Hillcrest Lane Edina, MN 55435 (952)925- 5119(h) (763) 479 -4215 (w) July 26, 2004 Mr. Gordon Hughes City Manager City of Edina 4801 W. 500' Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 RE: City Council Endorsement Appointment to Nine Mile Creek Watershed District - Board of Managers Dear Mr. Hughes: Thank you for your note. Don Lofthus told me he had contacted you and I greatly appreciate your help and advise in my pursuit of this open position on the Board of Managers for the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. Of the two managers whose terms expire in September 2004, Aileen Kulak of Bloomington, told me she is not seeking reappointment to the Board. Floyd Laumann, also of Bloomington, is also up for reappointment. I am very interested in serving the community in this way and have demonstrated my interest by being an active member and Chairman of the watershed district's Citizens Advisory Committee for the last two years. I worked with the Board of Managers to provide 'a forum for citizen's concerns and interests while also promoting resident involvement in surface water issues. A list of the activities and accomplishments of the Citizens Advisory Committee during my tenure is attached. I wrote it to define the role of the position at the time when we were seeking a new Chairman and I remain an active member of the Committee. I have also enclosed my resume and other pertinent material. The things I am most proud of are the storm drain labeling program, start-up of the District's website, and starting the "On the Road" Citizens Advisory Committee meetings in each of the District's municipalities. I want to offer my time and energy to carry on the work of the Board of Managers. Thank you for your offer to give my resume to the City Council and for your help. If you have any questions, please contact me any time. Regards, Geoffrey H. ash Enclosures Geoffrey H. Nash, P.G. 6920 Hillcrest Lane Edina, NIN 55435 (952) 925 -5119 (h) (763) 4794215 (w) AREAS OF EXPERTISE: • Water Quality Monitoring • Contamination Investigation • Environmental Assessment • Lead Paint Risk Assessment EDUCATION: M.B.A., Boston University, May 1990 B.A., Geology, Knox College, IL, 1979 REGISTRATION: Licensed Professional Geologist, MN Certified Lead Paint Risk Assessor, MN FAMILYBUSINESS: 2001 - Present Owner, Rainwater Soap Co., LLC Hopkins Farmers Market vendor VOLUNTEER ACTIVITIES: 2001 -2004 Chairman, Citizens Advisory Committee, Nine Mile Creek Watershed District INTRODUCTION PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: 1991 - Present Wenck Associates, Inc. Licensed Professional Geologist 1990 Benchmark Productions, Inc., MA Marketing Consultant 1988 -1989 Bewick Associates, Inc., MA Assistant Manager Environmental Assessments 1986 -1988 Kurz Associates, Inc., MA Project Manager, Environmental Assessments 1981 -1986 Texas Eastern Corporation and Transwestern Gas Supply Company, TX Petroleum Exploration Geologist My experience spans twenty-four years in geology and environmental site assessment for a wide variety of commercial and industrial properties. SELECTED EXPERIENCE Lead Paint Risk Assessments for both residential properties seeking municipal Community Development Agency funding and for industrial properties prior to property transactions or renovations. Geoffrey H. Nash Certified Professional Geologist Field coordinator for environmental permitting on a 3.2 -mile pipeline construction project in southern Minnesota. Dealt with U.S Fish and Wildlife, State Office of Historic Preservation, and DNR staff. Also conducted right -of -way field inspection prior to permitting process to locate possible concerns. Developed training content and taught Municipal Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (MP3) seminar to County staff that incorporated new rules and field methods. Mapped hydrogeologic features for City of Buffalo Wellhead Protection Plan. Field coordination for soil and groundwater contamination sites where a combination of groundwater treatment, air sparging, and soil vapor extraction methods are being used to remediate each site. Developed Wenck's Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan report format when the State of Minnesota introduced the program for Stormwater Permits for Industrial Activities. Contracted to work on environmental permitting process for crude oil pipeline right -of- way in northern United States. Worked as an exploration geologist for the petroleum industry. Accomplishments: • Discovered an oil field that yielded over $500,000 in revenue within the first 14 months of production. • Marketed oil- and gas - producing properties, resulting in sales of $1.8 million. • Developed a large natural gas field adjacent to parent company's pipeline. • Acted as on -site supervisor for all geologic operations during the drilling of 22 oil and gas wells. PAneshrrmaster.doc Election of New Chairperson For the Citizens' Advisory Committee Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Purpose of the Citizens' Advisory Committee (CAC): The CAC is made up of volunteers whose responsibility is to advise the Board of Managers on water - related community concerns and sponsor volunteer activities that increase public awareness of these issues. Mesponsibilities of the CAC Chairperson: • Organize an agenda and conduct monthly CAC meetings; giving all those interested an opportunity to express themselves. • Report to the Managers on CAC interests and concerns at the monthly Board Meetings. • Constantly seek out new, interested members and volunteers to the CAC. • Focus the efforts of the CAC and volunteers on the core mission of the Watershed District (to maintain and enhance water quality within the District). • Work with the Communications Consultant in organizing and conducting monthly CAC meetings as well as a variety of CAC tasks. The Comm. Consultant does the work of writing and distributing agendas and minutes, provides support to the CAC Chair to plan and coordinate projects and activities, and serves as a liaison, along with the Chair, between the CAC members, the public and the Board of Managers. E -mail is a big plus. Examples of CAC Projects 2001 -2004 (Geoff Nash, Chairperson): 1. Nine Mile Creek Watershed District website (www ninemilecreekorg) - Design and implementation of website by Barr Engineering, with assistance from the Communications Consultant and the web master at Barr Engineering. 2. Storm Drain Marker Program - New program for volunteer groups. 3. 2002 Photo Contest of images from within the Watershed District. 4. 2003 Calendar of winning images — This calendar, with winning images from the Photo Contest, was used as 2002 annual communication publication. Mailed calendars to municipal, county and state leaders, municipal staff, state agencies that work with water and the environment, statewide watershed districts, nonprofit organizations that deal with water and members of the public. 5. 2004 Photo Contest - We are holding a Photo Contest this year for a 2005 Calendar. 6 "On the Road" CAC Meetings - Initiated rotation of CAC meetings out into the Watershed's six municipalities in order to try to build local relationships and enhance public participation. 7. Adopt A -Creek Program - Proposed and still working on program for developing volunteers from corporations within the Watershed District. 8. Watershed Map - CAC Map Subcommittee provided input on a new version of the Watershed map to be used by the District as the 2003 annual communication publication. The map is available at city halls, libraries and local parks. Anyone interested in the map can also receive a free copy by calling the Watershed District's office. 9. Grant - The CAC was the forum for an Edina group, Buckthorn Busters, seeking support to control this noxious weed, which over time could affect the creek's banks. Their request for support was granted by the Board in the form of an in -kind contribution, specifically a section on the website on Buckthorn removal. 10. Outreach - CAC members helped staff the Watershed District's educational booth at the 2003 Minnetonka, City Open House. 11. Election - Created a job description for the new chairperson. Other Issues: • Establish a two -year term for CAC chairperson Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Pagel of 2 general I lakes & creeks regulatory program = municipalities I citizen advisory I construction permits For more information contact For Immediate Release Andrea Lex, Communications Consultant February 22, 2002 952- 380 -9968 i7yw From storm drain markers to photo contests, new chair brings new ideas to the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Edina, Minn. — Geoffrey Nash, Edina, was recently elected chair of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Citizens' Advisory Committee (CAC). He brings his enthusiasm and commitment to the volunteer committee that serves as the eyes and ears for the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Board of Managers. Members of the CAC look out for issues of pollution or erosion within the Watershed District and then report to the managers. They help educate the public on water issues. They assist with events and activities the Watershed District holds throughout the year, such as volunteering at environmental fairs at local schools, coordinating an annual field trip, and staffing a booth at the annual meeting of the Minnesota Association of Watershed Districts. CAC members also help with publications, and were instrumental in designing and printing a map of the watershed in 1999. "The map has been essential in helping us educate the public. It's almost impossible to talk about the watershed and explain what it is without showing a map of the creek and the physical boundaries of the watershed, which essentially are all the high points in the area that drain into one spot," Nash comments. CAC meetings serve as a forum for District residents to bring ideas. "Our function is to facilitate individuals to help protect the watershed. We're always open for suggestions for new issues to bring before the board, and we are always looking for new volunteer members of the CAC. Most importantly, we want to be responsive to residents' concerns," says Nash. Nash started attending CAC meetings about four years ago because he was looking for opportunities to volunteer in local government. As a geologist who has been working in environmental consulting for the past 15 years, the Watershed District was a "natural" choice for him. This spring, Nine Mile Creek Watershed District will start a project of marking the stone drains within the watershed, and Nash is looking forward to this project. "This is an effort to raise awareness about surface water issues. People don't even realize that all the water from rain storms and melted snow, with all the pollution, sand and salt from street surfaces, goes right into our watershed, our wetlands and the creek," says Nash. The Watershed has purchased storm drain markers that say, " No dumping — drains to Nine Mile Creek," and the Watershed will recruit volunteers, including Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts, to apply the storm drain markers in various http: / /www.ninemilecreek .org/news /pr_nash.html 7/26/2004 Nine Mile Creek Watershed District neighborhoods throughout the Watershed. Earth Day on April 22nd will be the first day storm drain markers are applied. The project will continue throughout the spring and summer. "We want the public to know that everything flows downstream and eventually ends up in the Minnesota and the Mississippi Rivers. When we take care of the water in our watershed, we are helping our neighbors downstream. It's also about personal choices, such as using phosphorus -free fertilizer and preventing oil spills from getting into the storm drains," Nash notes. The storm drain marker project will help people remember this, and if they see garbage near their local storm drain they might clean it up. Water has always been an important issue for Nash. Minnesota has a great outdoors heritage, and he is trying to build stewardship and appreciation of the environment in his three children. From downhill skiing at Highland Park near Bush Lake, to canoeing and catching a few Sunnies at Lake Cornelia, Nash encourages his kids to enjoy the outdoors. Nash has lived in Edina for 11 years. He received a bachelor's degree in geology from Knox College in Galesburg, Illinois, and an MBA from Boston University. Residents of the Watershed District are invited to attend the Board of Managers' regular meetings on the third Wednesday of each month at 7:30 p.m. at Edina City Hall in the City Council Chambers. Any resident interested in water issues may attend the Citizens' Advisory Committee meetings also on the third Wednesday of each month, at 6:30 p.m. at the same location. For more information, call Geoff Nash at 763 - 479 -4215. You may also pick up an annual newsletter at your City Hall or your library. The new website, www.ninemilecreek.orQ, will be launched the week of March 4th. As part of launching the website, the Watershed District will hold a seasonal photo contest for anyone interested in participating. Starting March 4th, Nine Mile Creek will accept winter photos. The winner will receive a prize and his/her photo will be placed on the website. Send original photos to Lexicon Communications, 6990 Redwing Lane, Chanhassen, MN 55317. The only criteria are that the photos are original winter scenes of Nine Mile Creek or Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. They can be color or black and white. For more information, see the website. V1 home I general I lakes & creeks I regulatory program I news I municipalities construction permits Page 2 of 2 http: / /www.ninemilecreek .org/news /pr_nash.html 7/26/2004 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7/30/2004 -8/5/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 262218 7130/2004 104146 R.E.C.INC 194 432.07 CLARK TIF NOTE 93465 072904 1000.1303 DUE FROM HRA 1325.6531 SIGNS & POSTS 4400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5862.5515 194,432.07 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 5842.5515 262219 81612004 5822.5515 108767 3D SPECIALTIES 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 5842.5515 495.03 FENCE MATERIAL 93184 416423 1,201.39 GALVANIZED STEEL 93282 416462 1,696.42 262220 81512004 102403 AAA LAMBERTS LANDSCAPE PRODUCT 84.55 DIRT 93318 16859 84.55 262221 815/2004 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 19.62 93377 442542 107.24 93378 443935 105.80 93379 443936 38.12 93620 443934 24.84 93621 441285 107.24 93622 441286 83.96 93623 441284 486.82 262222 81612004 100615 ACME WINDOW CLEANING INC 575.10 STAIRWELL CLEANING 93185 053460 575.10 262223 8/6/2004 100617 ADAMS PEST CONTROL 95.73 PEST CONTROL 93186 166427 95.73 262224 8/5/2004 102626 AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES 380.05 READY MIX 93187 4075867 241.33 READY MIX 93535 4077624 1,013.46 READY MIX 93536 4077171 337.82 READY MIX 93537 4076971 1,351.28 READY MIX 93538 4077625 3,323.94 262225 81512004 100575 ALL SAFE FIRE & SECURITY 245.22 CHEMICAL CERTIFICATION 93443 60924 245.22 1325.6531 SIGNS & POSTS 4400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 8/4/2004 9:16:09 Page - 1 Business Unit GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET STREET NAME SIGNS CITY HALLIPOLICE BUILDING GENERAL MAINTENANCE VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING PARKING RAMP 5421.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GRILL 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 814/2004 9:16:09 Council Check Register Page - 2 7/30/2004 —8/5/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 262226 81612004 116798 ALL -WOOD PRODUCTS 3,195.00 GRINDING /REMOVAL 93466 10317 1644.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREES & MAINTENANCE 3,195.00 262227 8/512004 114821 ALLEGIANCE TELECOM CO WORLDWID 1,037.95 PHONE/DATA SERVICE 93539 10958675 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 1,037.95 262228 81612004 101606 AMERICAN HOTEL REGISTER CO. 95.99 SHOWER CURTAINS 93540 3644512 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 95.99 262229 816/2004 100630 ANCHOR PAPER CO. INC. 1,076.10 COPIER PAPER 93188 153475301 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1,076.10 262230 81612004 102109 ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER 466.24 2 -WAY RADIO REPAIR 93189 59907 1553.6237 RADIO SERVICE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 466.24 262231 81612004 102470 AON RISK SERVICES INC. OF MN 28,765.00 PREMIUM 93541 6100000062921 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 9,437.00 PREMIUM 93542 6100000062922 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 38,202.00 262232 8/5/2004 102172 APPERT'S FOODSERVICE 708.10 FOOD 93190 233780 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 708.10 262233 81512004 102646 AQUA LOGIC INC. 49.15 SCALE REMOVER 93543 25337 5620.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 49.15 262234 8/612004 100256 AT &T WIRELESS 28.67 93191 071704 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 28.67 262235 81512004 101964 AUGIE'S INC. 81.53 FOOD 93192 4985 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 81.53 � f 11 , CITY OF EDINA 8/4/2004 9:16:09 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 3 7/30/2004 -8/5/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 262236 81612004 900642 BANNERS TO GO 426.00 PARADE BANNERS 93193 17984 1627.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 215.13 SIGNS 93467 18010 1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 641.13 262237 81612004 104646 BARGEN INC. 2,450.00 CRACK SEALING 93194 24454 1314.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS STREET RENOVATION 2,450.00 262238 8/10004 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO. 7,039.00 STORM SEWER DESIGN 93283 2327354128 04286.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN VALLEY VIEW POND DREDGING 7,039.00 262239 81612004 102195 BATTERIES PLUS 4.24 BATTERIES 93319 18 -95585 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 202.34 BATTERIES 93319 18 -95585 5910.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL (BILLING) 206.58 262240 81612004 102449 BATTERY WHOLESALE INC. 827.99 BATTERIES 93320 20977 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 827.99 262241 81612004 106838 BAUDVILLE 131.40 CERTIFICATE PAPER, FOLDERS 93544 1175762 1513.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EMPLOYEE PROGRAMS 131.40 262242 8 16/2004 101365 BELLBOY CORPORATION 543.00 93380 30212800 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 543.00 262243 81612004 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 113.13 PAPER, EXT CORDS 93321 3107840 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 54.46 LABEL TAPE, PENS 93322 3106070 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 54.41 CASSETTE TAPES 93323 3109950 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 59:87 OFFICE SUPPLIES 93444 3110160 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 17.63 OFFICE SUPPLIES 93545 3122990 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 30.22 OFFICE SUPPLIES 93545 3122990 7410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 32.44 OFFICE SUPPLIES 93545 3122990 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 50.10 OFFICE SUPPLIES 93546 3124760 7410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 16.27 OFFICE SUPPLIES 93547 3108270 1490.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC HEALTH 60.35 OFFICE SUPPLIES 93547 3108270 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 90.67 OFFICE SUPPLIES 93547 3108270 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation Council Check Register P 156.43 OFFICE SUPPLIES 7/30/2004 - 67.35 OFFICE SUPPLIES PO # Doc No I 803.33 Account No S 262244 61612004 93547 3 100660 BEST ACCESS SYSTEMS 1140.6406 G GENERAL SUPPLIES P 20.16 KEYS 3114210 1 1552.6406 G 20.16 CENT SVC PW BUILDING 262246 81512004 1552.6530 R 100068 BFI CENT SVC PW BUILDING 93195 0 32,171.80 RECYCLING RECYCLING CHARGES R RECYCLING 32,171.80 93464 1 262246 8/6/2004 GENERAL MAINTENANCE 100663 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS 072804 1 1419.6102 C 105.68 ASPHALT 93549 6 6430 1 105.68 CONTRACTED REPAIRS B 262247 8/6/2004 650180 1 100711 BLOOD, DAVID REPAIR PARTS E EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 4400.6710 E EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT C 100.00 93285 2 262248 8/6/2004 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT C 100623 BOSS PUMPING 93468 2 233505 4 110.00 TANK PUMPING CITY HALL/POLICE BUILDING 93273 0 110.00 1419.6102 C 262249 81612004 100669 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 135.03 MODULE ASSEMBLY 135.03 262260 8/6/2004 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 2,460.00 ELEVATOR REVIEW 6,138.54 ELEVATOR STUDY 208.00 CONCRETE TESTING 8,806.54 262261 8/512004, 100776 BUTLER, GEORGE 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 100.00 262252 8/6/2004 103386 CARNIVAL TIME RENTA 615.00 FAMILY JAMBOREE 615.00 L 93286 20000493 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER CITY OF EDINA 8 8/4/2004 9:16:09 Council Check Register P Page - 4 7/30/2004 - - 8/512004 PO # Doc No I Inv No A Account No S Subledger Account Description B Business Unit 93547 3 3108270 1 1140.6406 G GENERAL SUPPLIES P PLANNING 93548 3 3114210 1 1552.6406 G GENERAL SUPPLIES C CENT SVC PW BUILDING 93324 M MN- 340185 1 1552.6530 R REPAIR PARTS C CENT SVC PW BUILDING 93195 0 040700 5 5952.6183 R RECYCLING CHARGES R RECYCLING 93196 9 93464 1 1301.6518 B BLACKTOP G GENERAL MAINTENANCE 93275 0 072804 1 1419.6102 C CONTRACTUAL SERVICES R RESERVE PROGRAM 93549 6 6430 1 1646.6180 C CONTRACTED REPAIRS B BUILDING MAINTENANCE 93325 6 650180 1 1553.6530 R REPAIR PARTS E EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 93284 2 233063 4 4400.6710 E EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT C CITY HALLMOLICE BUILDING 93285 2 232286 4 4400.6710 E EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT C CITY HALL/POLICE BUILDING 93468 2 233505 4 4400.6710 E EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT C CITY HALL/POLICE BUILDING 93273 0 072804 1 1419.6102 C CONTRACTUAL SERVICES R RESERVE PROGRAM .r i 8/4/2004 9:16:09 Page- 5 Business Unit CLUB HOUSE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 124.61 FAX MACHINE 93327 NV39174 1120.6406 CITY OF EDINA ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 DVD -ROM DRIVE 93328 NU08106 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 84.65 SCANNER 93328 NU08106 Council Check Register EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COMMUNICATIONS 122 78 TONER CARTRIDGE 93328 NU08106 7/30/2004 -8/5/2004 GENERAL SUPPLIES Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 262253 8/6/2004 100453 CASUAL CONTRACT 200.00 AR &LE BROCHURE 2,015.78 DINING TABLES 93469 9422 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 200.00 2,015.78 262254 81612004 100681 CATCO 426.21 MULTIFASTERS 93326 3 -52989 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 4090.4751 PARKING PERMITS 61.71 FITTINGS 93550 10 -90509 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES 487.92 262259 81512004 100689 CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP. 262266 816/2004 102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 460.00 8/4/2004 9:16:09 Page- 5 Business Unit CLUB HOUSE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 124.61 FAX MACHINE 93327 NV39174 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 47.64 DVD -ROM DRIVE 93328 NU08106 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 84.65 SCANNER 93328 NU08106 2210.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COMMUNICATIONS 122 78 TONER CARTRIDGE 93328 NU08106 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS PSTF FIRE TOWER ADAPTIVE RECREATION STREET REVOLVING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS 379.68 262266 815/2004 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 64.22 93197 JUL21 7413.6582 FUEL OIL 64.22 262257 816/2004 102822 CHAD NESTOR & ASSOCIATES 200.00 AR &LE BROCHURE 93198 040504 -1 1629.6575 PRINTING 200.00 262258 8/6/2004 116796 CHRISTENSEN, MARGARET 32.00 PARKING PERMIT REFUND 93470 072904 4090.4751 PARKING PERMITS 32.00 262259 81512004 100689 CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP. 460.00 MIRROR, DOOR STRIKER 93287 41767 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 261.41 SPEED SENSOR 93288 41855 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 113.81 PADDLE LOCK 93551 42145 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES 835.22 262260 81SM004 102122 CLINNET SOLUTIONS LLC 608.0.0 DRUG TESTING 93199 815440 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL 608.00 262261 815/2004 101345 COLOURS 1,466.51 PRINTING 93200 9128 2210.6575 PRINTING 3,135.00 DESIGN 93200 9128 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4,601.51 PSTF FIRE TOWER ADAPTIVE RECREATION STREET REVOLVING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS CITY OF EDINA 8/4/2004 9:16:09 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 6 7/30/2004 - 8/5/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 262262 8/6/2004 101323 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS 39.01 GLOVES 93329 02367038 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 130.45 BANDAGES, SUNSCREEN 93330 02366074 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 263.20 GLOVES, TAPE, EARMUFFS 93552 02367478 5911.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER 116.83 GLOVES, SAFETY GLASSES 93553 02369628 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 549.49 262263 81512004 100613 COVERALL OF THE TWIN CITIES IN 2,742.38 CUSTODIAL SERVICE 93616 87823 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 2,742.38 262264 8/6/2004 116797 DAUGHTON, ELIZABETH 138.00 CLASS REFUND 93471 072804 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES - 138.00 262266 81612004 103986 DAVE'S GREAT AD SHOP 150.00 LIQUOR AD /COUPON 93445 1843 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 150.00 262266 8/6/2004 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING 19.80 93381 274533 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 987.75 93382 274532 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 430.74 93383 274332 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 558.70 93624 274530 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 19,80 93625 274531 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 339.00 93626 274014 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,424.65 93627 274526 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 53.60 93628 274527 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,834.04 262267 8/612004 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 93.03 RIVET SET, BIT SET 93472 650184 1646.6556 TOOLS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 93.03 262266 8/612004 101634 DELI DOUBLE 6,090.60 FOOD 93331 68560 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 6,090.60 262269 816/2004 100720 DENNYS 6TH AVE. BAKERY 72.81 BAKERY 93473 172740 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 54.13 BAKERY 93474 172982 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date 262270 816/2004 262271 8/6/2004 262272 816/2004 262273 816/2004 262274 81612004 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7/30/2004 -8/5/2004 Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1906 BAKERY 93475 173040 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 146.00 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT 102712 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION 1646.6188 TELEPHONE 82.09 2210.6188 93476 V04060596 37.00- CREDIT 93477 DV04050296 14.82 GREENHOUSE 93478 W04060589 29.69 5861.6188 93478 W04060589 44.46 ARNESON 93478 W04060589 44.88 HISTORICAL 93478 W04060589 59.28 5210.6188 93478 W04060589 74.10 TELEPHONE 93478 W04060589 74.10 CARD ACCESS - PARKS 93478 W04060589 74.10 5311.6188 93478 W04060589 74.19 TELEPHONE 93478 W04060589 75.36 93478 W04060589 100.22 93478 W04060589 118.73 93478 W04060589 163.40 93478 M4060589 216.23 93478 W04060589 241.74 93478 W04060589 1,450.39 101668 DIE BAVARIAN MUSIKMEISTERS 125.00 PERFORMANCE 8/11/04 93479 073004 125.00 101791 DORFNER, MARK 118.22 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 93554 073004 118.22 100730 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 4,685.55 LEGAL 93289 1168988 4,685.55 100731 DPC INDUSTRIES 320.11 CHLORINE 93201 82701102 -04 2,945.93 CHEMICALS 93332 82701080 -04 3,631.73 CHEMICALS 93333 82701088 -04 1,399.69 CHEMICALS 93334 82701103 -04 8,297.46 8/4/2004 9:16:09 Page - 7 Business Unit GRILL 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 2210.6188 TELEPHONE COMMUNICATIONS 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1481.6188 TELEPHONE YORK FIRE STATION 5210.6188 TELEPHONE GOLF DOME PROGRAM 5111.6188 TELEPHONE ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING 8 HOCKEY 5311.6188 TELEPHONE POOL OPERATION 5610.6188 TELEPHONE ED ADMINISTRATION 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 1195.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT R55CKREG LOG20000 117.15 CITY OF EDINA 262280 81512004 Council Check Register 116448 EGAN OIL COMPANY 7/30/2004 —815/2004 FUEL Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 262275 816/2004 5423.6406 101747 DRESSER TRAP ROCK INC. 611.77 9,419.55 FA -2 ROCK 93202 52338 1314.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK 7,263.57 FA -2 ROCK 93203 52435 1314.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK 93204 560490006656 16,683.12 CONSULTING DESIGN 10,387.00 SCADA SYTEM DESIGN 262276 8/6/2004 05414.1705.20 106039 EAGLE ONE GOLF PRODUCTS 11,685.37 SCADA SYTEM DESIGN 93204 560490006656 759.60 COURSE MARKERS 93555 34494 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 759.60 262282 815/2004 106213 EMSAR TWIN CITIES 262277 8/6/2004 100739 EAGLE WINE 208.24 COT REPAIRS 93446 8748 618.65 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 93384 924456 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 780.99 93385 924462 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 713.40 93629 924459 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 93205 1735 2,113.04 WEB DEVELOPMENT 262278 81612004 100741 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 265.00 93480 13189 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 2,266.45 93630 322808 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 4,141.30 93631 322810 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 6,672.75 262279 8/5/2004 100742 ECOLAB PEST ELIMINATION DIVISI 8/4/2004 9:16:09 Page - 8 Business Unit STREET RENOVATION STREET RENOVATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING GRILL 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING 117.15 PEST CONTROL 93556 3677502 5620.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GOLF CARS SCADA STORM SEWER SCADA WATERMAIN SCADA SANITARY SEWER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS 117.15 262280 81512004 116448 EGAN OIL COMPANY 348.89 FUEL 93557 88299 5422.6581 GASOLINE 262.88 FUEL 93558 88300 5423.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 611.77 262281 8/5/2004 106194 EMA INC. 3,895.12 SCADA SYTEM DESIGN 93204 560490006656 04284.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 10,387.00 SCADA SYTEM DESIGN 93204 560490006656 05414.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 11,685.37 SCADA SYTEM DESIGN 93204 560490006656 03404.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 25,967.49 262282 815/2004 106213 EMSAR TWIN CITIES 208.24 COT REPAIRS 93446 8748 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 208.24 262283 8/6/2004 105339 ENRGI 80.00 WEBSITE DESIGN 93205 1735 2210.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GOLF CARS SCADA STORM SEWER SCADA WATERMAIN SCADA SANITARY SEWER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS 8/4/2004 9:16:09 Page- 9 Business Unit GENERAL STORM SEWER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EDINBOROUGH PARK FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING 446.25 93632 12050 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 446.25 262291 81512004 108501 FIRE -END & CROKER CORP. 213.91 FOLDING LADDER 93448 125281 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 213.91 262292 81512004 101512 FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL COMPANY 1,533.60 SEWER HOSE 93560 8883 5920.6530 REPAIR PARTS SEWER CLEANING 1,533.60 262293 81512004 101475 FOOTJOY 99.25 SHOES 93482 5965505 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 66.61 SHOES 93483 5963749 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 54.85 SHOES 93484 5967963 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 7/30/2004 —8/5/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 80.00 262284 81512004 100762 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC. 1,791.33 CATCH BASIN FILTERS 93290 GG3344 5932.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,791.33 262285 816/2004 100216 FARMER BROTHERS COFFEE 40.20 COFFEE 93481 7848813 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 40.20 262286 8/6/2004 113720 FASTENER PLACE 53.58 SOCKETS 93206 13963 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 53.58 262287 8/6/2004 102003 FASTSIGNS BLOOMINGTON 95.76 SIGN LETTERING 93559 190 -25282 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 95.76 262288 81512004 102669 FOSOA 75.00 ANNUAL DUES 93447 072704 1470.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 75.00 262289 8/5/2004 104474 FILTERFRESH 188.93 COFFEE 93291 87675 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 188.93 262290 81SM004 105697 FINE WINES FROM EUROPE 8/4/2004 9:16:09 Page- 9 Business Unit GENERAL STORM SEWER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EDINBOROUGH PARK FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING 446.25 93632 12050 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 446.25 262291 81512004 108501 FIRE -END & CROKER CORP. 213.91 FOLDING LADDER 93448 125281 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 213.91 262292 81512004 101512 FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL COMPANY 1,533.60 SEWER HOSE 93560 8883 5920.6530 REPAIR PARTS SEWER CLEANING 1,533.60 262293 81512004 101475 FOOTJOY 99.25 SHOES 93482 5965505 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 66.61 SHOES 93483 5963749 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 54.85 SHOES 93484 5967963 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES CITY OF EDINA 8/4/2004 9:16:09 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 10 7/30/2004 -8/5/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO N Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 220.71 262294 81612004 104071 FREUND, JEFF 12.55 PETTY CASH 93561 073004 5620.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH PARK 285.85 PETTY CASH 93561 073004 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 298.40 262295 8/5/2004 100773 GENERAL PARTS INC. 775.47 POPCORN KETTLE 93562 618079 5320.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL CONCESSIONS 775.47 262296 81612004 100774 GENERAL REPAIR SERVICE 375.00 REPAIR & EMOXY COAT 93292 12577 5921.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS LIFT STATION MAINT 375.00 262297 81612004 116796 GILCHRIST, WILLIAM 100.00 BAGPIPER 93485 072604 5400.2072 MEN'S CLUB GOLF BALANCE SHEET 100.00 262298 81612004 102386 GOLF MINNESOTA 385.00 MAGAZINES 93335 04.12.89 5410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 385.00 262299 8/512004 101679 GOLFCRAFT 207.00 HEADCOVERS 93486 17940 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 207.00 262300 816/2004 101103 GRAINGER 112,72 PAINT 93336 495 - 345924 -7 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 23.73 SUNSCREEN 93337 001 - 331858 -9 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 173.32 PAINT, SPRAY GRIPS 93338 495 - 382370 -7 5913.6532 PAINT DISTRIBUTION 62.37 LAMPS 93487 495 - 243300 -3 1646.6578 LAMPS & FIXTURES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 372.14 262301 8158004 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 218.00 93633 65804 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 218.00 262302 8168004 101360 GREEN ACRES SPRINKLER CO. 551.20 SPRINKLER SYS MAINT 93339 041082 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 551.20 CITY OF EDINA 8/4/2004 9:16:09 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 11 7/30/2004 - 8/5/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 262303 8/612004 102125 GREG LESSMAN SALES 544.83 GOLF BALLS 93207 28645 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 86.63 BALL RETRIEVERS 93563 28689 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 631.46 262304 8/512004 100782 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. .85 93386 911302 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2.55 93387 921255 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1.70 93388 924227 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,526.51 93389 924464 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 400.69 93390 924463 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 7,399.59 93391 918082 5642.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,499.75- 93392 644639 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 178.19- 93393 644640 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 391.70- 93394 644273 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 515.57 93634 924461 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 26.80 93635 924460 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 531.75 93636 924399 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 164.99 93637 924457 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,219.00 93638 924458 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 10,720.36 262305 8/612004 110972 H.F. TUCKER & ASSOCIATES INC. 1,275.00 EMPLOYEE COUNSELING 93489 072604 1644.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREES & MAINTENANCE 1,275.00 262306 81612004 106431 HALL, MARY 150.00 PERFORMANCE 8/10/04 93490 073004 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 150.00 262307 8/6/2004 101733 MANLY, WILLIAM 19.00 CLASS A LICENSE 93340 072804 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 19.00 262308 8/6/2004 116447 HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON IN 806.00 PRELIM DESIGN 93293 12850 05430.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN WATERMAIN EXT - OXFORD & 52ND 806.00 262309 8/5/2004 103369 HANSON PIPE & PRODUCTS INC. 385.53 SLAB CONCRETE CASTING 93341 477004370782 5932.6536 CASTINGS GENERAL STORM SEWER 385.53 CITY OF EDINA 8/4/2004 9:16:09 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 12 7/30/2004 — 8/5/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 262310 8/6/2004 100795 HARRIS HOMEYER CO. 121,098.00 PREMIUM 93564 51004 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 121,098.00 262311 8/5/2004 100797 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT 1,135.82 CAUSTIC SODA 93294 634837 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 1,135.82 262312 8/512004 101209 HEIMARK FOODS 200.64 MEAT PATTIES 93208 017731 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 200.64 262313 8/5/2004 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 382.50 JUNE 2004 93449 000562 1195.6225 BOARD & ROOM PRISONER LEGAL SERVICES 382.50 262314 815/2004 106371 HENNEPIN FACULTY ASSOCIATES 2,265.17 MEDICAL DIRECTOR SERVICES 93281 072804 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,265.17 262316 81612004 116680 HEWLETT - PACKARD COMPANY 1,190.14 PCS AND MONITORS 93295 36184345 1490.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PUBLIC HEALTH 5,950.68 PCS AND MONITORS 93295 36184345 1495.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT INSPECTIONS 7,140.82 262316 8/6/2004 102484 HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MANUFACTURI 463.28 FIELD MARKING PAINT 93491 64648 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER FIELD MAINTENANCE 463.28 262317 8/612004 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 404.00 93395 336703 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 59.90 93639 336704 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 463.90 262318 8/6/2004 102114 HUEBSCH 116.31 TOWELS, RUGS, RAGS 93565 122507 5620.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK 116.31 262319 8/512004 101426 HUGHES, GORDON 269.63 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 93492 073004 1120.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ADMINISTRATION 269.63 8/4/2004 9:16:09 Page- 13 Business Unit BUILDING MAINTENANCE METER REPAIR 18000 MAILING LIST UPDATE 93567 4-19- 169007 2210.6123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 180.00 CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 262323 8/512004 116786 IPM GROUP INC. Council Check Register 118.75 PAINT 93342 7/30/2004 -8/5/2004 1375.6103 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 262320 8/612004 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 104822 HYDRO LOGIC 184.50 PAINT 93344 889.11 SUBMERSIBLE PUMP 93493 0134882 -IN 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS 128.10 889.11 93345 280025102 1375.6103 262321 81612004 100811 HYDRO METERING TECHNOLOGY 5,099.22 WATER METERS 93566 0027251 -IN 5917.6530 REPAIR PARTS 101861 J.H. LARSON COMPANY 5,099.22 262322 816/2004 BALLASTS 105540 INFO USA 4422735-02 1551.6406 8/4/2004 9:16:09 Page- 13 Business Unit BUILDING MAINTENANCE METER REPAIR 18000 MAILING LIST UPDATE 93567 4-19- 169007 2210.6123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS PARKING RAMP PARKING RAMP PARKING RAMP PARKING RAMP CITY HALL GENERAL PARKING RAMP RESERVE PROGRAM POOL OPERATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 180.00 262323 8/512004 116786 IPM GROUP INC. 118.75 PAINT 93342 280024572 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 98.60 PAINT 93343 280024620 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 184.50 PAINT 93344 280024657 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 128.10 PAINT 93345 280025102 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 529.95 262324 81612004 101861 J.H. LARSON COMPANY 72.24 BALLASTS 93209 4422735-02 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 33.54 PLATES 93210 4422735-01 1375.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 105.78 262325 81612004 101400 JAMES, WILLIAM F 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 93279 072804 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 100.00 262326 8/512004 102167 JEFF ELLIS & ASSOCIATES INC. 500.00 AUDITING FEES 93568 20017718 5311.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 500.00 262327 815/2004 103067 JENSON, THOMAS 11.00 CLASS B DRIVERS LICENSE 93450 072804 1470.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS 210.85 TV, VCR/DVD 93450 072804 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 221.85 262328 8/6/2004 100832 JIM HATCH SALES 706.80 SHOVELS, BROOMS 93211 6109 1301.6556 TOOLS 706.80 262329 815/2004 102059 JOHNS, RICHARD PARKING RAMP PARKING RAMP PARKING RAMP PARKING RAMP CITY HALL GENERAL PARKING RAMP RESERVE PROGRAM POOL OPERATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/4/2004 9:16:09 Council Check Register Page - 14 7/30/2004 -8/5/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 89.95 UNIFORM REIMBURSEMENT 93569 073004 5620.6201 LAUNDRY EDINBOROUGH PARK 89.95 262331 81612004 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 1,269.25 93396 1755225 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 58.90 93397 1755224 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 347.66 93398 1755223 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 982.08 93399 1755211 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 28.56- 93400 256149 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5.68- 93401 256147 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 45.00- 93402 256146 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 6.04- 93403 256145 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 17.29- 93404 256144 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 101.03- 93405 256264 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 34.68- 93406 256150 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 7.00- 93407 256148 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 50.40- 93408 253745 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 55.74 93640 1758475 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 62.30 93641 1758474 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,275.21 93642 1758476 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 244.95 93643 1758478 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 592.32 93644 1758469 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 681.94 93645 1758471 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,367.10 93646 1758479 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,936.96 93647 1758480 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS, SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,559.08 93648 1758481 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,334.19 93649 1758482 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 226.70 93650 1758484 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 244.95 93651 1758486 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 342.45 93652 1758470 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 65.65 93653 1759805 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 932.16 93654 1759807 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 365.00 93655 1758487 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 342.45 93656 1758473 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 177,90 93657 1758494 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 922.48 93658 1758488 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,476.73 93659 1758472 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 185.90 93660 1758493 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,052.11 93661 1758489 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 47.90 93662 1758490 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 61,78 r 93663 1758491 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING CITY OF EDINA O /Y /GVVY �. IV.Va R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 15 7/30/2004 - 8/5/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 19,916.16 262332 81512004 106182 JOHNSON RADIO COMMUNICATIONS 334.65 MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 93451 159830 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 334.65 262333 81612004 101646 JOHNSON, NAOMI 64.44 CRAFT SUPPLIES 61527 030703 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 64.44 262334 8/5/2004 114558 KESTREL DESIGN GROUP INC., THE 482.38 MEADOW ROAD LANDSCAPE 93296 2021 5911.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER 482.38 262335 8/512004 100514 KIWANIS CLUB OF EDINA 125.00 DUES 93212 070104 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 125.00 262336 81512004 102047 KLITZKE RPT, PAUL 100.00 PIANO TUNING 93346 203685 5420.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CLUB HOUSE 100.00 262337 8/6/2004 100846 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO 1,491.10 93409 407434 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 17.00 93664 408141 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 861.50 93665 408142 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 19.00 93666 408098 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 733.25 93667 408099 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 3,121.85 262338 8/5/2004 116805 KURHAJEC, MYRNA 18.73 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 93570 080204 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 18.73 262339 807004 100848 LABOR RELATIONS ASSOCIATES INC 1,449.00 CONSULTING FEE 93571 070104 1120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 1,449.00 262340 8/5/2004 116804 LAKE, JOAN 674.00 JOAN LAKE - 041693 93572 080204 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 804.00 JOAN LAKE - 041670 93572 080204 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,478.00 CITY OF EDINA 8/4/2004 9:16:09 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 16 7/30/2004 -8/5/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 262341 81512004 100862 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 219.48 CLAMPS, FITTINGS 93297 2235262 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 195.29 TY -RAP, CABLE TIES 93347 2231553 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 414.77 262342 81612004 102225 LEBERT, ANITA 100.88 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 93348 072604 5410.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GOLF ADMINISTRATION 100.88 262343 816/2004 116785 LEE, GISELA 70.00 CLASS REFUND 93298 072404 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 70.00 262344 8/612004 100853 LEEF SERVICES 30.37 SHOP TOWELS 93573 222603 5422.6201 LAUNDRY MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 30.37 262345 8/6/2004 112630 LENTSCH, KATHERINE 20.00 PROGRAM REFUND 93299 072404 1600.4390.06 SAFETY CAMP PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 20.00 262346 815/2004 100856 LESCO INC. 63.26 POSTING STICKS 93494 10924811 1643.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL TURF CARE 125.14 LIQUID FERTILIZER 93574 11246590 5422.6540 FERTILIZER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 203.20 SUPERINTENDENT TOOLS 93575 9RFZ73 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 391.60 262347 81612004 116803 LEWIS, JANET 756.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 93576 080204 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 756.00 262348 816/2004 102204 LOBBY, MACKENZIE 14.95 REIMBURSEMENT 93495 072904 5310.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT POOL ADMINISTRATION 17.52 REIMBURSEMENT 93495 072904 5310.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL ADMINISTRATION 89.25 PHONE REIMBURSEMENT 93577 073004 5311.6188 TELEPHONE POOL OPERATION 121.72 262349 8/6/2004 106301 LOFFLER COMPANIES INC. 50.00 COPIER USAGE 93452 091115 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 50.00 V R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7/30/2004 -8/5/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Descnpbon 262360 8/612004 100868 LOGIS 262361 30.00 93300 24272 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 930.00 93300 24272 2210.6160 DATA PROCESSING 1,993.00 93300 24272 1495.6160 DATA PROCESSING 2,058.50 93300 24272 1120.6160 DATA PROCESSING 2,347.00 93300 24272 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING 2,985.00 93300 24272 5910.6160 DATA PROCESSING 4,673.00 93300 24272 1190.6160 DATA PROCESSING 4,861.50 93300 24272 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING 8/4/2004 9:16:09 Page - 17 Business Unit CENT SERV GEN - MIS COMMUNICATIONS INSPECTIONS ADMINISTRATION CENT SERV GEN - MIS GENERAL (BILLING) ASSESSING FINANCE 19,878.00 262361 81612004 100861 LYNDALE GARDEN CENTER 97.76 MULCH 93496 685419 1644.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES TREES & MAINTENANCE 102.18 POTS, HOE 93578 679319 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 127.74 WHISKEY BARRELS 93579 679851 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 327.68 262362 8/6/2004 112677 M. AMUNDSON LLP 471.89 CANDY 93497 163750 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 471.89 262363 816/2004 114699 MANAGED SERVICES INC. 48.99 JANITORIAL SERVICES 93580 022899 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 48.99 262364 816/2004 102981 MARATHON ASHLAND PETROLEUM LLC 4,521.72 CRS -2 93349 978249 1314.6519 ROAD OIL STREET RENOVATION 4,562.46 CRS-2 93350 978250 1314.6519 ROAD OIL STREET RENOVATION 4,515.33 CRS -2 93351 986224 1314.6519 ROAD OIL STREET RENOVATION 13,599.51 262366 8/5/2004 100868 MARK VII SALES 22,00 93410 694496 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 646.75 93411 694495 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,070.40 93412 694224 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,400.30 93413 694521 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,397.33 93668 696878 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,747.85 93669 694225 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 24.00 93670 694226 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 9,308.63 262366 815/2004 116410 MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS CITY OF EDINA 8/4/2004 9:16:09 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 18 7/30/2004 -8/512004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 618.80 POT HOLE PATCH 93213 2346093RI 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE 618.80 262367 8/6/2004 116806 MASTEL, PETER 250.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 93581 080204 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 250.00 262368 8/612004 100875 MCCAREN DESIGNS INC. 1,344.03 PLANTS FOR LOBBY 93453 28732 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 1,344.03 262359 81512004 101308 MCCARTHY, LOWELL 122.25 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 93498 073004 1490.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PUBLIC HEALTH 122.25 262360 8152004 116545 MCCARTHY, TERESA 20.00 CLASS REFUND 93301 072404 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 20.00 262361 8152004 105603 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS 2,242.50 AUG 12 TRIP 93499 072904 1628.6103.07 TRIPS PROF SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 2,242.50 262362 81612004 100963 MEDTRONIC PHYSIO CONTROL CORP. 600.00 LIFEPAK MAINTENANCE 93454 PC469376 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 600.00 262363 81512004 101483 MENARDS 147.98 PADLOCKS, HAND TOOLS 93214 44278 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 46.83 HAND TOOLS, NAILS 93500 45407 1646.6556 TOOLS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 9.20 HEX BOLTS 93582 47027 5910.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL (BILLING) 105.01 CONDUIT 93583 46110 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 39.29 TOW STRAP, GLOVES 93584 45824 5431.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 348.31 262364 8162004 101987 MENARDS 57.45 KNEEPADS, HELMET 93585 7087 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 57.45 262366 8152004 100881 MERFELD, BURT. 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 93274 072804 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/4/2004 9:16:09 Council Check Register Page - 19 7/30/2004 - 815/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description us mess ni 262366 81512004 100882 MERIT SUPPLY 373.28 TOWELS, LOTION, CUPS 93586 64940 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 373.28 262367 81512004 101891 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY 463.67 FIELD MARKING PAINT 93501 76774 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER FIELD MAINTENANCE 84.99 BASES 93502 76788 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 568.66 262368 8/512004 104650 MICRO CENTER 69.21 COMPUTER ITEMS 93352 674923 44003.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 800 MHZ RADIO 175.55 COMPUTER ITEMS 93352 674923 . 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 244.76 262369 81512004 100891 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. 798.59 ASPHALT 93215 72315MB 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE 12,291.28 ASPHALT 93215 72315MB 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 121.41 ASPHALT 93216 72287MB 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 3,635.96 ASPHALT 93216 72287MB 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE 16,847.24 262370 8/5/2004 100692 MIDWEST COCA -COLA EAGAN 16.00- 93414 87224132 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 613.80 93415 87224124 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 472.60 93416 83669240 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,070.40 262371 81512004 101890 MIDWEST VENDING INC 97.52 CANDY 93503 3146 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 97.52 262372 8/5/2004 100913 MINNEAPOLIS SUBURBAN SEWER & W 1,360.00 WATER SERVICE REPAIR 93217 32537 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 850.00 STOPBOX REPAIR 93353 32536 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 2,210.00 262373 81512004 101589 MINNESOTA GFOA 600.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 93504 073004 1160.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS FINANCE 600.00 262374 8/5/2004 101376 MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPMENT R55CKREG LOG20000 235.00 SEMINAR CITY OF EDINA INV147865 1120.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION Council Check Register SEMINAR 93589 INV147866 1120.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION 7/30/2004 -8/5/2004 470.00 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER 1,549.14 HYDRANT 93354 0150810 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS 178.22 1,549.14 93590 0061359 -IN 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 262376 815/2004 178.22 112908 MINNESOTA ROADWAYS CO. 262379 249.85 CRS II 93218 45946 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 97.77 CRS II 93219 45892 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 4505.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 86.90 CRS II 93220 45902 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 217.26 EMULSION 93221 45852 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 97.77 CRS II 93587 46000 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SUBSCRIPTION 93505 749.55 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 262376 8 1612004 103240 MINNESOTA SAFETY COUNCIL 262381 8/612004 434.00 DEFENSIVE DRIVING CLASSES 93506 014273 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 434.00 AUG 12 MEETING 93507 073004 1640.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 262377 8/6/2004 101779 MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSOCIATIO 8/4/2004 9:16:09 Page - 20 Business Unit DISTRIBUTION GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE SENIOR CITIZENS 235.00 SEMINAR 93588 INV147865 1120.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION 235.00 SEMINAR 93589 INV147866 1120.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION 470.00 262378 8 1512004 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER 178.22 STEEL 93590 0061359 -IN 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 178.22 262379 8/6/2004 100169 MOOERS PRINTING INC. 347.19 FALL BROCHURES 93591 3621 4505.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MN TECHNICAL RESCUE SCHOOL 347.19 262380 81612004 103061 MPLS ST PAUL MAGAZINE 22.95 SUBSCRIPTION 93505 073004 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 22.95 262381 8/612004 100092 MPSA 40.00 AUG 12 MEETING 93507 073004 1640.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 40.00 262382 8/512004 102776 MRPA 260.00 STATE SOFTBALL TOURNAMENT 93592 073004 4077.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 260.00 262383 8/6/2004 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 89.75 HUB 93355 419042 -01 '553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERA- 'EN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7/30/2004 -8/5/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 269.29 DRIVE ASSEMBLIES 93508 422770-00 1643.6530 REPAIR PARTS 12616 HEX BOLTS WHEEL NUTS 93593 423842 -00 5431.6530 REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 8/4/2004 9:16:09 Page - 21 Business Unit GENERAL TURF CARE RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL TELEPHONE ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TOBACCO ENFORCEMENT CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 485.20 262384 81612004 100921 NATIONAL CAMERA EXCHANGE 100.01 CAMERA SUPPLIES 93594 07234071POS 1646.6406 100.01 262385 8/6/2004 116787 NEW BUSINESS USA 120.00 MAILING LIST UPDATES 93356 19221133 2210.6123 120.00 262386 8/6/2004 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 405.00 93417 26789 5862.5513 551.00 93418 26791 5842.5513 1,017.00 93671 26790 5822.5513 1,973.00 262387 815/2004 104672 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 2,187.47 93455 757391129020 1470.6151 447,24 93456 909583317032 1400.6188 38.44 93509 679000121021 1120.6188 2,673.15 262388 8/5/2004 116794 NIBBE, DAVID 105.00 TOBACCO COMPLIANCE 93510 072704 1413.6103 105.00 262389 8/512004 100724 NISSEN, DICK 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 93278 072804 1419.6102 100.00 262390 8/612004 101620 NORTH SECOND STREET STEEL SUPP 286.53 STEEL BEAM, STRIP 93595 085215 1553.6585 286.53 262391 8/6/2004 103813 NORTHERN TURF SERVICES INC. 1,948.00 WELL CONTROL UPDATES 93596 168 5422.6611 1,948.00 262392 8/5/2004 100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY 114.67 ART SUPPLIES 93357 29873102 5120.5510 GENERAL SUPPLIES 8/4/2004 9:16:09 Page - 21 Business Unit GENERAL TURF CARE RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL TELEPHONE ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TOBACCO ENFORCEMENT CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP CITY OF EDINA 8/4/2004 9:16:09 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 22 7/30/2004 -8/5/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 6.42 CANVAS PANELS 93358 30104201 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 28.80 CRAYOLAS 93359 30194500 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 149.89 262393 8/612004 100930 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO. 134.40 SCRAP TIRE DISPOSAL 93597 NW -91153 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 134.40 262394 81612004 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 211.81 BINDING MACHINE 93222 252080735-001 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 211.81 262395 8 1612004 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 137.39 EXCAVATOR HOOK 93360 290640 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 213.94 CHAIN 93598 289964 5422.6530, REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 351.33 262396 816/2004 100939 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC. 199.68 COOKIES 93223 71309643 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 106.64 COOKIES 93511 72947243 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 306.32 262397 81612004 100940 OWENS COMPANIES INC.' 1,043.98 FILTERS, DESOLVE 93361 77957 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 871.55 GREASE, FILTERS 93362 77925 1551.6530 REPAIR PARTS CITY HALL GENERAL 1,915.53 262398 816/2004 100941 PARK NICOLLET CLINIC 203.74 PHYSICAL 93302 18601773 5410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 203.74 262399 81612004 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 2,039.40 93419 8042663 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,481.00 93420 8042450 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 88.00- 93421 8042259 -CM 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,432.40 262400 8/612004 101688 PELINKA, DICK 224.25 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 93599 072904 1652.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE WEED MOWING 224.25 262401 81612004 100674 PENHALL COMPANY R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date 262402 8/612004 Amount Vendor / Explanation 275.00 CORE DRILL 275.00 100946 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 1.110.05 177 nn CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7/30/2004 -8/5/2004 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 93363 40873 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 93224 64058305 93457 66384782 93672 63409770 262403 8/5/2004 100946 PERA 77,093.71 PPEND 7/27/04 93600 073004 77,093.71 262404 8/6/2004 100948 PERKINS LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS 2,268.00 REPAIR SOD DAMAGE 93225 6-1 -2004 316.70 MULCH FOR 66TH ST 93226 7 -22 1,200.00 FRANK TUPA PARK 93512 PO 5549 3,784.70 262406 815/2004 102406 PETSMART#458 60.04 GROOMING, FOOD 93227 T -7866 60.04 262406 8/6/2004 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 93.80 93422 2094556 1,542.00 93423 2094555 517.10 93424 2094554 345.80 93673 2092825 231.37 93674 2096870 517.45 93675 2096871 997.20 93676 2096872 918.59 93677 2096873 1,626.55 93678 2096874 622.80 93679 2096875 168.60 93680 2096878 3,963.30 93681 2096877 11,544.56 262407 81512004 105876 PICKERMAN'S SOUP AND SANDWICHE 107.86 BOX LUNCHES 93228 4075867 107.86 5421.5510 5320.5510 5822.5515 1000.2023 05423.1705.30 1301.6406 1643.6103 1438.6103 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5822.5513 5822.5512 5822.5513 5822.5513 5842.5512 5842.5513 5842.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 1504.6218 COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX P.E.R.A. PAYABLE CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 8/4/2004 9:16:09 Page - 23 Business Unit STREET NAME SIGNS GRILL POOL CONCESSIONS 50TH ST SELLING GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET WELL #14 REHAB 6367 DEWEY HILL GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL TURF CARE K -9 UNIT VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING EDUCATION PROGRAMS HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION CITY OF EDINA 8/4/2004 9:16:09 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 24 7/30/2004 —8/5/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 262408 81512004 102166 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING 890.81 93682 45024 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 759.38 93683 45023 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 168.83 93684 45050 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,819.02 262409 8 1512004 101110 POLLY NORMAN PHOTOGRAPHY 200.00 ABOUT TOWN PHOTOS 93458 072804 2210.6123 MAGAZINEINEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 200.00 262410 816/2004 100961 POSTMASTER 150.00 BRM PERMIT #06171 93364 072804 1550.6235 POSTAGE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 150.00 262411 8/5/2004 101434 PRAIRIE EQUIPMENT COMPANY - 32.00 FUSES 93365 4015 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 32.00 262412 81612004 102884 PRAIRIE LAWN S GARDEN 110.70 V -BELTS 93601 073426 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 600.13 MOWER REPAIRS 93602 072803 5630.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES 710.83 262415 8/612004 106802 PRINT CRAFT INC. 1,055.68 ART SCAPE BROCHURES 93229 404491 -01 2210.6575 PRINTING COMMUNICATIONS 1,055.68 262414 8/5/2004 101032 PRINT SHOP, THE 794.49 NEWSLETTER 93513 19514 1628.6575 PRINTING SENIOR CITIZENS 794.49 262416 81512004 100968 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 1,413.84 93425 924692 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,337.34 93426. 924690 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 758.40 93685 924691 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3.509.58 262416 81612004 100969 PROGRESSIVE CONSULTING ENGINEE 5,712.62 CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION 93303 03012.17 05413.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION WATER TREATMENT PLANT #2 5,712.62 262417 8151200 1100970 QUALITY REFRIGERATION INC R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date 262419 81612004 Amount Vendor / Explanation 195.00 CONTRACT ORTLY BILLING 195.00 18.31- 1,852.17 11.62- 1,176.29 9.16- 923.71 12.12- 1,226.94 54.98- 2,766.54 1.17- 58.52 10.48- 529.60 383.57 - 5.10- 513.83 25.43- 1,278.87 30.11- 1,520.15 11,284.57 100971 QUALITY WINE CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7/30/2004 - 8/512004 PO # Doc No Inv No 93230 14593 93427 433748 -00 93427 433748 -00 93428 433598 -00 93428 433598 -00 93429 432813 -00 93429 432813 -00 93430 433572 -00 93430 433572 -00 93431 433794 -00 93431 43379400 93432 427777 -00 93432 427777 -00 93433 428700 -00 93433 428700 -00 93434 426738 -00 93686 433606.00 93686 433606 -00 93687 433795-00 93687 433795 -00 93688 43378400 93688 43378400 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 5421.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GRILL 5860.5518 5862.5513 5860.5518 5862.5513 5840.5518 5842.5513 5840.5518 5842.5513 5840.5518 5842.5512 5840.5518 5842.5512 5840.5518 5842.5512 5842.5512 5820.5518 5822.5513 5820.5518 5822.5512 5860.5518 5862.5512 VENDOR DISCOUNTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VENDOR DISCOUNTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VENDOR DISCOUNTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VENDOR DISCOUNTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VENDOR DISCOUNTS COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VENDOR DISCOUNTS COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VENDOR DISCOUNTS COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VENDOR DISCOUNTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VENDOR DISCOUNTS COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VENDOR DISCOUNTS COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 8/4/2004 9:16:09 Page - 25 VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL VERNON SELLING VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL VERNON SELLING LIQUOR YORK GENERAL YORK SELLING LIQUOR YORK GENERAL YORK SELLING LIQUOR YORK GENERAL YORK SELLING LIQUOR YORK GENERAL YORK SELLING LIQUOR YORK GENERAL YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH STREET GENERAL 50TH ST SELLING 50TH STREET GENERAL 50TH ST SELLING VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL VERNON SELLING 262420 81612004 101965 QWEST 111.80 952 920 -8166 93231 071904 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1,025.08 952 920 -8752 93514 07/19/04 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 54.93 952 829 -9560 93515 JUL19 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 54.68 952 929-0297 93516 072504 4090.6188 TELEPHONE STREET REVOLVING 65.33 952 927 -8861 93517 JUL25 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 82.89 952 929 -9549 93518 JUL 25 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 1,394.71 262421 8/612004 101111 REED BUSINESS INFORMATION 108.87 AD FOR BID 93232 2612796 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 131.79 AD FOR BID 93233 2612797 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 166.17 AD FOR BID 93234 2612798 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 108.87 AD FOR BID 93235 2616402 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 131.79 AD FOR BID 93236 2616403 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 GRILL 1,552.83 CITY OF EDINA GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER GENERAL SUPPLIES 262422 Council Check Register 102408 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED 7/30/2004 -8/5/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 137.52 AD FOR BID 93237 2616404 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 166.17 AD FOR BID 93238 2616405 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 137.52 AD FOR BID 93239 2620894 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 137.52 AD FOR BID 93240 2624998 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 108.87 AD FOR BID 93241 2637966 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 108.87 AD FOR BID 93242 2641583 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 108.87 AD FOR BID 93243 2646445 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 8/4/2004 9:16:09 Page - 26 Business Unit ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GRILL PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK HAZ. WASTE DISPOSAL SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 1,552.83 VANVALKENBURG GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER GENERAL SUPPLIES 262422 815/2004 102408 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED 92.21 HITCH SHANKS 93304 1393696 -01 1553.6530 92.21 262423 8/6/2004 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 269.27 SOFTENER SALT 93519 00151821 5421.6406 269.27 262424 81612004 116393 ROGERS, RUSS 150.00 PERFORMANCE 8/12104 93520 073004 5610.6136 150.00 262426 815/2004 116360 SAFE STEP INC. 138.45 DEGREASER 93603 1915 5620.6511 138.45 262426 8/62004 100988 SAFETY KLEEN 105.44 CHANGE OUT PARTS WASHER 93244 MB01090743 1280.6271 105.44 262427 8152004 101634 SAINT AGNES BAKING COMPANY 32.76 BAKERY 93521 105665 5421.5510 32.76 262428 8152004 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 22.95 101- 26373069350 93305 072604 4075.5510 32.51 101 - 26373069350 93305 072604 1624.6406 55.46 262429 8/62004 106442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO. 71.87 LUMBER 93245 443446 1301.6406 71.87 REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 8/4/2004 9:16:09 Page - 26 Business Unit ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GRILL PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK HAZ. WASTE DISPOSAL SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD VANVALKENBURG GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE CITY OF EDINA 8/4/2004 9:16:09 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 27 7/30/2004 —8/5/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 262430 8/512004 100995 SEH 853.77 WELL #7 REVIEW 93306 0117550 05429.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN WELL #7 REHAB 721.43 SPRINT REVIEW 93307 0116118 5915.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WATER TREATMENT 1,411.39 SPRINT REVIEW 93308 0117125 5915.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WATER TREATMENT 691.92 PED SIGN DESIGN 93309 0117033 10084.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN W 51 ST & HALIFAX PED SIDEWALK 3,678.51 262431 8/5/2004 101687 SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES 1,511.00 DIAL -A -RIDE JUNE 2004 93459 072604 1514.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DIAL -A -RIDE PROGRAM 1,511.00 262432 8/612004 103249 SHANNON, JIM 440.00 STROLLING PIANO - AUG 93522 073004 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 440.00 262433 81512004 104098 SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL 194.10 MICROSOFT LICENSES 93366 817BO 04284.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES SCADA STORM SEWER 517.59 MICROSOFT LICENSES 93366 817BO 05414.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES SCADA WATERMAIN 582.29 MICROSOFT LICENSES 93366 817BO 03404.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES SCADA SANITARY SEWER 2,299.34 MICROSOFT LICENSES 93366 817BO 1495.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT INSPECTIONS 3,593.32 262434 81612004 101002 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS INC 2,821.25 93435 152752 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 63.65 93436 152753 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,575.15 93689 152749 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 4,460.05 262435 8/6/2004 102424 SPEEDY PRINT 2,529.50 SCORECARDS 93460 50689 5410.6575 PRINTING GOLF ADMINISTRATION 2,529.50 262436 8/6/2004 116535 ST PAUL TRAVELERS 2,229.35 DEDUCTIBLE 93604 GPO9305158 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 2,229.35 262437 815/2004 116784 ST. ANDREW LUTHERAN CHURCH 42.00 ADMISSION REFUND 93310 072604 5301.4541 GENERAL ADMISSIONS AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES 42.00 262438 8/612004 103277 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO INC 89.62 AIR FILTERS 93311 S130271 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CITY OF EDINA 8/4/2004 9:16:09 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 28 7/30/2004 -8/5/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 89.62 262439 8/5/2004 113568 STEFFENS, NICK 102.00 MODEL 69459 071903 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 102.00 262440 8/5/2004 112668 STONEBROOKE EQUIPMENT INC. 3,120.00 SNOWPLOW- INSTALLED 93367 4904 5900.1735 AUTOMOBILES & TRUCKS UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 3,120.00 262441 81612004 102390 STRAND MANUFACTURING CO INC 140.58 MODIFY DOORS 93368 25147 5923.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS COLLECTION SYSTEMS 140.58 262442 8/6/2004 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 58.13 FILTERS 93246 345866CVW 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 8.73 SCREWASSEMBLY 93247 346010CVW 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 66.86 262443 8/6/2004 106874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC. 86.18 TIRES 93248 10025892 1553.6583 TIRES 6 TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 86.18 262444 8/5/2004 102140 SUN MOUNTAIN SPORTS INC. 173.85 GOLF BAGS 93249 493756 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 86.92 GOLF BAG 93523 494857 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 19.00 UMBRELLA 93524 494677 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 279.77 262445 8/512004 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 157.30 AD FOR BID 93250 698236 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 135.85 AD FOR BID 93251 698239 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 193.05 AD FOR BID 93252 698251 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 157.30 AD FOR BID 93253 702186 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 107.25 HEARING NOTICE 93254 702187 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 107.25 HEARING NOTICE 93255 702188 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 123.34 HEARING NOTICE 93256 702190 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 101.89 AD FOR BID 93257 706322 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 35.75 HEARING NOTICE 93258 706324 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 107.25 AD FOR BID 93461 709452 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 1,226.23 R55CKREG LOG20000 37.17 MERCHANDISE CITY OF EDINA 07239868 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES Council Check Register 7/30/2004 - 8/5/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 262446 81612004 93262 100926 SUN TURF INC. 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 624.27 433.63 CLUTCH 93259 539764 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 262451 81612004 433.63 101034 THOMSEN & NYBECK 262447 81612004 110674 SUPERIOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIO PROSECUTING 93263 197522 1195.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 83.01 CLIP CASES 93260 5803 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 83.01 CLIP CASES 93260 5803 5911.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 37.26 HEADSET 93312 5954 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 93525 35.34 PHONE CASE 93369 6014 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 131.95 238.62 342245 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 262448 8/6/2004 100794 SWANSON, HAROLD 262463 8/6/2004 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 93277 072804 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 100.00 199.90 CABLE SERVICE 93526 072604 5430.6103 262449 8/6/2004 104932 TAYLOR MADE 199.90 8/4/2004 9:16:09 Page - 29 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL MAINTENANCE PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION RESERVE PROGRAM 37.17 MERCHANDISE 93261 07239868 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 37.17 262450 81612004 101326 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO 624.27 BULBS, TERMINALS, FUSES 93262 59526 -00 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 624.27 262451 81612004 101034 THOMSEN & NYBECK 63.50 PROSECUTING 93263 197522 1195.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES 63.50 262462 8/6/2004 101036 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY - 186.00 93525 13484 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 131.95 93690 342245 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 317.95 262463 8/6/2004 114701 TIME WARNER CABLE 199.90 CABLE SERVICE 93526 072604 5430.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 199.90 262464 8/6/2004 101474 TITLEIST 1,564.93 GOLF BALLS 93264 1389048 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 406.31 GOLF BALLS 93527 1402983 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 752.64 GOLF BALLS 93528 1392645 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 2,723.88 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Check # Date 262455 81612004 262456 8/6/2004 262457 816/2004 262458 8/6/2004 262459 8/5/2004 262460 8/612004 262461 815/2004 262462 816/2004 8/4/2004 9:16:09 Page - 30 Business Unit UIJ I KWU I IUN LS -26 LIFT STATION 14 LS -27 LIFT STATION 15 LIFT STATION #5 LIFT STATION #13 LIFT STATION HIGHLANDS LAKE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CENTENNIAL LAKES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION GENERAL TURF CARE CENT SVC PW BUILDING CITY HALUPOLICE BUILDING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAI Council Check Register 7/30/2004 -8/5/2004 Amount Vendor/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 102742 TKDA ENGINEERS'ARCHITECTS PLAN 136.18 VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT 93313 068211 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,719.38 DESIGN & BIDDING SERVICES 93314 068217 10026.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 2,719.38 DESIGN & BIDDING SERVICES 93314 068217 10027.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 2,719.38 DESIGN & BIDDING SERVICES 93314 068217 10028.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 2,719.38 DESIGN & BIDDING SERVICES 93314 068217 10029.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 2,719.39 DESIGN & BIDDING SERVICES 93314 068217 10030.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 13,733.09 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 122.48- CREDIT 93370 310520 5422.6556 TOOLS 23.88 WELDING TANKS 93371 450090 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 58.00 WELDING GASSES 93372 313039 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES 101.49 WELDING GASSES 93373 313903 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES 60.89 116778 TRANSMISSION SHOP OF GOLDEN VA 16.22 C6 PAN 93265 9545 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 16.22 101042 TRIARCO 143.80 PLASTERCRAFT, BADGE PARTS 93374 885203 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES 143.80 100682 TRUGREEN -CHEMLAWN 106.50 WEED CONTROL 93605 191756 1643.6546 WEED SPRAY 106.50 - 101047 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO 385.00 PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE 93606 220149 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS 385.00 116779 TWIN CITY METALSEAL INC. 675.00 POWDER COATING 93266 50660 4400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 675.00 100363 U.S. BANK 93.33 93462 072804 1470.6106 MEETING EXPENSE 139.00 93462 072804 1550.6235 POSTAGE 168.15 93462 072804 1470.6614 FIRE PREVENTION 195.00 93462 072804 1470.6579 TRAINING AIDS 254.97 93462 072804 470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 8/4/2004 9:16:09 Page - 30 Business Unit UIJ I KWU I IUN LS -26 LIFT STATION 14 LS -27 LIFT STATION 15 LIFT STATION #5 LIFT STATION #13 LIFT STATION HIGHLANDS LAKE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CENTENNIAL LAKES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION GENERAL TURF CARE CENT SVC PW BUILDING CITY HALUPOLICE BUILDING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAI CITY OF EDINA 8/4/2004 9:16:09 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 31 7/30/2004 -8/5/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 280.00 93462 072804 1470.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,182,37 93462 072804 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 3,312.82 262463 8/612004 101049 UHL COMPANY 149.00 QUARTERLY MAINTENANCE FEE 93607 116441 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 149.00 262464 8/6/2004 101908 US FOODSERVICE INC 88.26 CLEANERS 93267 33197478 5311.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 445.25 CONCESSION PRODUCT 93267 33197478 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 46.86 TISSUE 93463 33199486 5311.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 304.38 CONCESSION PRODUCT 93463 33199486 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 251.34 LINERS 93529 33201775 5311.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 672.61 CONCESSION PRODUCT 93529 33201775 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 1,808.70 262466 8/6/2004 100050 USPS 6,000.00 POSTAGE 93608 073004 1550.6235 POSTAGE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 6,000.00 262466 815/2004 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 484.36 PAPER PRODUCTS 93530 540345 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 471.80 BAGS 93609 540339 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 956.16 262467 81612004 106308 VEITH, MICHELLE 318.71 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 93315 072704 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 318.71 262468 8/5/2004 101610 VERIZON DIRECTORIES CORP. 90.75 DIRECTORY AD 93375 390009153147 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 90.75 262469 8/6/2004 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 103.07 CART PARTS 93610 15631 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF CARS 376.48 CART PARTS 93611 15611 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF CARS 479.55 262470 815/2004 102218 VINTAGE ONE WINES 93437 8863 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 85.50 85.50 R55CKREG LOG20000 319.82 34.81 CITY OF EDINA REPAIR PARTS 101743 WAGERS INC. 262476 24.84 Council Check Register 101080 WALSH, WILLIAM 24.84 YORK SELLING 262473 8/6/2004 7/30/2004 -8/5/2004 102886 WAGNER GREENHOUSES INC. Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 262471 816/2004 101069 VOSS LIGHTING 101223 WALSER FORD 262476 31.63 LIGHTING 93316 2189324 -00 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 127.65 LIGHTING 93317 2189195 -00 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 160.54 LIGHTING 93317 2189195 -00 1330.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1419.6102 1646.6530 1553.6406 1553.6585 8/4/2004 9:16:09 Page - 32 Business Unit BUILDINGS CITY HALL GENERAL TRAFFIC SIGNALS SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT 319.82 34.81 262472 8/5/2004 REPAIR PARTS 101743 WAGERS INC. 262476 24.84 MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 93464 CNIN016463 1400.6230 101080 WALSH, WILLIAM 24.84 YORK SELLING 262473 8/6/2004 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 102886 WAGNER GREENHOUSES INC. POLICE SERVICE 55.78 FERTILIZER, PERENNIAL 93376 110271 4090.6406 55.78 100.00 262474 8/5/2004 101223 WALSER FORD 262476 34.81 BELT 8 BUCKLE ASSEMBLY 93268 113708WFOW 1553.6530 1419.6102 1646.6530 1553.6406 1553.6585 8/4/2004 9:16:09 Page - 32 Business Unit BUILDINGS CITY HALL GENERAL TRAFFIC SIGNALS SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 34.81 STREET REVOLVING REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 262476 8/6/2004 REPAIR PARTS 101080 WALSH, WILLIAM COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 93276 072804 100.00 262476 81612004 116793 WEBB, TERRI 234.29 CELL PHONE DAMAGE 93531 073004 234.29 262477 8/6/2004 101077 WEST WELD SUPPLY CO. 47.57 HOSE, WHEEL 93269 63553 258.51 DRILL BITS, TAPS 93612 63774 306.08 262478 8/6/2004 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 583.60 93691 32707 -00 583.60 262479 8/6/2004 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 894.15 93438 101076 13.32- 93439 21450 198.80 93692 101540 230.75 93693 101538 2,106.60 93694 101536 1419.6102 1646.6530 1553.6406 1553.6585 8/4/2004 9:16:09 Page - 32 Business Unit BUILDINGS CITY HALL GENERAL TRAFFIC SIGNALS SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET REVOLVING REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 8/4/2004 9'16'09 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register Page - 33 7/30/2004 —8/5/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 3,416.98 1263610010204 1330.6185 52.76 93272 1671793348205 262480 8/6/2004 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 93613 93617 1215173122209 5620.6185 2,691.80 1,456.50 93618 93440 153065 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 682.25 5913.6185 93441 153140 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 597.00 93442 152917 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,735.75 76.01 262486 262481 81612004 101087 WROBLESKI, HENRY 101386 ZUHRAH SHRINE CONCERT BAND 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 93280 072804 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 262482 8/5/2004 101726 XCEL ENERGY 52.82 93270 2357377472203 1551.6185 28.46 262483 93271 1263610010204 1330.6185 52.76 93272 1671793348205 1460.6185 11,447.95 93613 93617 1215173122209 5620.6185 2,691.80 JAN -JUNE METER USAGE 93618 1002656716209 5911.6185 25 582 86 93619 0748247681208 5913.6185 1550.6151 1550.6151 5422.6406 5610.6136 5610.6136 1600.4390.06 LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER EQUIPMENT RENTAL EQUIPMENT RENTAL GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL TRAFFIC SIGNALS CIVILIAN DEFENSE EDINBOROUGH PARK PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER DISTRIBUTION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION SAFETY CAMP PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 39,856.65 262483 8/5/2004 100568 XEROX CORPORATION 1,290.00 JAN -JUNE BASE CHARGE 93613 003584737 1,567.83 JAN -JUNE METER USAGE 93614 003584735 2,857.83 262484 8/5/2004 101089 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 76.01 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 93615 54063358 76.01 262486 81512004 101386 ZUHRAH SHRINE CONCERT BAND 75.00 PERFORMANCE 8/9/04 93533 073004 75.00 262486 8/6/2004 102960 ZUHRAH SHRINE FLAMES 100.00 PERFORMANCE 818/04 93534 073004 100.00 262487 8/5/2004 106217 BANTA, DON 350.00 SAFETY CAMP SPEAKER 93780 060304 350.00 1550.6151 1550.6151 5422.6406 5610.6136 5610.6136 1600.4390.06 LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER EQUIPMENT RENTAL EQUIPMENT RENTAL GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL TRAFFIC SIGNALS CIVILIAN DEFENSE EDINBOROUGH PARK PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER DISTRIBUTION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION SAFETY CAMP PARK ADMIN. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7/30/2004 —8/5/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 907,182.62 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 907,182.62 Total Payments 907,182.62 8/4/2004 9:16:09 Page - 34 R55CKSUM LOG20000 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 583,710.60 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 7,431.53 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 12,216.66 05100 ART CENTER FUND 879.10 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 75.36 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 5,675.58 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 25,198.41 05600 EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND 14,641.23 05800 LIQUOR FUND 105,654.36 05900 UTILITY FUND 103,706.12 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 13,546.41 05950 RECYCLING FUND 32,171.80 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 2,275.46 Report Totals 907,182.62 CITY OF EDINA 8/4/2004 9:18:23 Council Check Summary Page - 1 7/30/2004 - 8/5/2004 We confirm to the best of our laowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing pplicies and procedury� T_- , j"P2z# City r CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 8/12/2004 - 8/12/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 262488 8/12/2004 110728 10,000 LAKES CHAPTER 60.00 CHAPTER SEMINAR 93695 080304 1495.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 60.00 262489 811212004 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 42.84 93849 444435 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 31.56 94054 443651 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 84.52 94055 444437 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 53.40 94056 443550 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 37.40 94057 443652 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 121.64 94058 444436 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 371.36 262490 8/1212004 100616 ACTION MAILING SERVICES INC. 259.33 MAIL PROCESS 93781 100338 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 259.33 262491 811212004 100618 ADIRONDACK DIRECT 144.00 STORAGE SHELVES 93885 296238 -02 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 157.88 UTILITY CART 93886 296238-01 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 301.88 262492 8/12/2004 102191 ADVANCED GRAPHIC SYSTEMS INC. 339.04 TONER CARTRIDGES 93696 INV00055642 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 339.04 262493 8/12/2004 102626 AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES 295.59 READY MIX 93697 4076375 1314.6520 CONCRETE 274.48 READY MIX 93956 4078503 1314.6520 CONCRETE 570.07 262494 8/12/2004 100676 ALL SAFE FIRE & SECURITY 1,629.60 CHEMICAL CERTIFICATION 93957 61127 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 49.03 CHEMICAL CERTIFICATION 93958 61130 5311.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,678.63 262495 8/12/2004 100630 ANCHOR PAPER CO. INC. 8.75 SAFETY CERTIFICATES 93959 S43532201 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 8.75 262496 8/12/2004 102171 ANDERSON • JOHNSON ASSOCIATES 781.55 ARCHITECT FEES 93960 031040704 47032.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 8/11/2004 10:14:15 Page - 1 Business Unit INSPECTIONS 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING GENERAL (BILLING) POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL STREET RENOVATION STREET RENOVATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN POOL OPERATION PLAYGROUND & THEATER RENOVATE W FLD LENS & LIGHTS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 262604 811212004 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS - Council Check Register 88.38 WASTE/RECYCLING 93913 080104 7411.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 8/12/2004 -8/12/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 70.12 781.55 93702 5278 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 91.04 262497 811212004 5631 102172 APPERTS FOODSERVICE COST OF GOODS SOLD 161.16 621.66 FOOD 93698 237254 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 107.14 621.66 93703 072004 '470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 262498 8/1212004 101276 APRES 62.04 RENTAL ITEMS 93699 92269 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 62.04 262499 8/12/2004 100632 AQUA ENGINEERING 21.95 PIPE FITTINGS 93700 2361 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 21.95 262600 8112/2004 102646 AQUA LOGIC INC. 517.97 POOL FILTER PARTS 63961 25392 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 347.93 POOL PLASTER REPAIR 93962 25367 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 865.90 262601 _ 811212004 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 80.95 COFFEE 93963 6013 - 408992 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 80.95 262502 811212004 101977 ARCH WIRELESS 10.96 PAGER 93782 N6096083H 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 10.96 262603 8/1212004 102012 ARMENIAN DANCE ENSEMBLE 8/11/2004 10:14:15 Page - 2 Business Unit GRILL COMMUNICATIONS GENERAL MAINTENANCE EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK CITY HALL GENERAL CITY HALL GENERAL 150.00 PERFORMANCE 8/16/04 93701 080104 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 150.00 262604 811212004 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS - 88.38 WASTE/RECYCLING 93913 080104 7411.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 88.38 262606 8/1212004 101954 AUGIE'S INC. 70.12 FOOD 93702 5278 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 91.04 FOOD 93964 5631 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 161.16 262606 811212004 100638 BACHMAN'S 107.14 93703 072004 '470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY RICHARDS GOLF COURSE RICHARDS GOLF COURSE FIRE DEPT. GENERP' 5610.6136 2210.6123 1301.6180 6410.6406 4400.6710 5822.5515 5842.5513 5862.5513 5862.5515 5862.5513 5862.5515 5620.6530 1140.6406 1553.6406 8/11/2004 10:14:15 Page- 3 Business Unit GENERAL STORM SEWER TREES & MAINTENANCE GRANDVIEW REVOLVING MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION MAGAZINEINEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE GOLF ADMINISTRATION CITY HALUPOLICE BUILDING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING EDINBOROUGH PARK PLANNING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 262607 811212004 103241 BALDINGER, WENDY Council Check Register 8/12/2004 -8/12/2004 PERFORMANCE 8117/04 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 203.36 93703 072004 5932.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 334.99 93703 072004 1644.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES 932.78 93703 072004 4091.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1 504 94 93703 072004 5422.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES 5610.6136 2210.6123 1301.6180 6410.6406 4400.6710 5822.5515 5842.5513 5862.5513 5862.5515 5862.5513 5862.5515 5620.6530 1140.6406 1553.6406 8/11/2004 10:14:15 Page- 3 Business Unit GENERAL STORM SEWER TREES & MAINTENANCE GRANDVIEW REVOLVING MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION MAGAZINEINEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE GOLF ADMINISTRATION CITY HALUPOLICE BUILDING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING EDINBOROUGH PARK PLANNING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 3,083.21 262607 811212004 103241 BALDINGER, WENDY 125.00 PERFORMANCE 8117/04 93704 080104 125.00 262608 811212004 106016 BARBEAU MARKETING GROUP INC. 3,465.39 AD SALES COMMISSION 93887 2004 -05 3,465.39 262609 8/12/2004 104646 BARGEN INC. 2,492.73 CRACK SEALING 93816 24545 2,492.73 262610 811212004 102267 BEACHS AWARDS 186.75 PLAQUES 93705 072904 186.75 262611 8/12/2004 106490 BELAIR EXCAVATING 6,767.80 CITY HALUPOLICE FACILITY 93909 APPL 13 6,767.80 262512 8/12/2004 101366 BELLBOY CORPORATION 246.18 93850 38703700 907.00 93851 30211900 648.00 94059 30309000 266.12 94060 38742100 440.00 94061 30233300 136.70 94062 4916800 2,644.00 262513 8/12/2004 103406 BENNEROTTE MARKETING AGENCY 26.07 SHOWER PARTS 93965 59591 26.07 262614 8/12/2004 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 78.21 OFFICE SUPPLIES 93783 3129260 16.50- CREDIT 93784 CM3106070 5610.6136 2210.6123 1301.6180 6410.6406 4400.6710 5822.5515 5842.5513 5862.5513 5862.5515 5862.5513 5862.5515 5620.6530 1140.6406 1553.6406 8/11/2004 10:14:15 Page- 3 Business Unit GENERAL STORM SEWER TREES & MAINTENANCE GRANDVIEW REVOLVING MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION MAGAZINEINEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE GOLF ADMINISTRATION CITY HALUPOLICE BUILDING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING EDINBOROUGH PARK PLANNING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CITY OF EDINA 8/11/2004 10:14:15 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 4 8/12/2004 - 8/12/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 45.42 BINDERS, TABS 93966 3128750 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 78.21- CREDIT 93967 CM3108270 1140.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLANNING 29.43 OFFICE SUPPLIES 93968 3138350 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 58.35 262515 8/12/2004 101296 BERTRAND, MIKE 85.78 SMOKER URNS 93706 080204 5430.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 85.78 262516 817212004 _ 104063 BIOCLEAN MOBILE WASH INC. 561.79 WASH VEHICLES 93817 45895 1553.6238 CAR WASH EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 561.79 262517 8/1212004 103474 BODEAU, SANDRA 83.00 PROGRAM REFUND 93969 080504 1600.4390.02 TENNIS PROGRAM PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 83.00 262618 8M 212004 103820 BRANDENBURG, HEIDI 32.00 PARKING PERMIT REFUND 93888 080404 4090.4751 PARKING PERMITS STREET REVOLVING 32.00 262519 8/12/2004 101489 BROOKS, DARLENE 996.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 94183 080504 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 996.00 262620 8/12/2004 116843 CARVER SCOTT CO-OP 72.00 PARTIAL REFUND 93970 080604 5301.4541 GENERAL ADMISSIONS AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES 72.00 262621 8/12/2004 100681 CATCO 144.61 HOSE ENDS, FITTINGS 93818 3 -54033 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN . 67.64 SEAL, BEARING 93819 3 -54073 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 212.25 262622 8/1212004 102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 556.58 ACROBAT 6 93707 NV82641 1260.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ENGINEERING GENERAL 239.49 TONER 93914 NZ36123 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 796.07 262623 8/12/2004 100897 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MINNEGASCO 10.48 93889 080204 5821.6186 HEAT 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 12,29 93889 080204 941.6186 HEAT YORK OCCUPANCY 8/11/2004 10:14:15 Page- 5 Business Unit RICHARDS GOLF COURSE VERNON OCCUPANCY MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CENT SVC PW BUILDING GOLF DOME PROGRAM YORK FIRE STATION CENTENNIAL LAKES CLUB HOUSE PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT BUILDING MAINTENANCE SENIOR CITIZENS DISTRIBUTION ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES 100.29 MERCHANDISE 93971 276633 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 927.09 MERCHANDISE 93972 277037 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1 547 90 MERCHANDISE 93973 276951 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 2,575.28 CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 262626 8/12/2004 116610 CITI -CARGO & STORAGE CO. INC. Council Check Register 122.48 CONTAINER RENTAL 8/12/2004 - 8/12/2004 1552.6530 Check # Date Amount Vendor/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 16.78 93889 080204 5430.6186 HEAT 103040 CITY PAGES 20.45 93889 080204 5861.6186 HEAT 33.07 93889 080204 5422.6186 HEAT ADVERTISING OTHER 37,28 93889 080204 1552.6186 HEAT 53.25 93889 080204 5210.6186 HEAT 106693 CITYSPRINT 59.19 93889 080204 1481.6186 HEAT 72,14 93889 080204 5630.6186 HEAT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 116.37 93889 080204 5420.6186 HEAT 166.33 93889 080204 5911.6186 HEAT 100689 CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP. 200.84 93889 080204 1470.6186 HEAT 270.97 93889 080204 5111.6186 HEAT REPAIR PARTS 423.15 93889 080204 1646.6186 HEAT 470.75 93889 080204 1628.6186 HEAT 647.86 93889 080204 5913.6186 HEAT 5,800.78 93889 080204 5511.6186 HEAT 8,411.98 262624 8112/2004 116842 CHURCH OF ST THERESE OF DEEPHA 8.00 PARTIAL REFUND 93975 080604 5301.4541 GENERAL ADMISSIONS 8.00 262526 8/12/2004 102123 CIT GROUPICOMMERCIAL SERVICES, 8/11/2004 10:14:15 Page- 5 Business Unit RICHARDS GOLF COURSE VERNON OCCUPANCY MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CENT SVC PW BUILDING GOLF DOME PROGRAM YORK FIRE STATION CENTENNIAL LAKES CLUB HOUSE PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT BUILDING MAINTENANCE SENIOR CITIZENS DISTRIBUTION ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES 100.29 MERCHANDISE 93971 276633 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 927.09 MERCHANDISE 93972 277037 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1 547 90 MERCHANDISE 93973 276951 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES CENT SVC PW BUILDING ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ELECTION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,575.28 262626 8/12/2004 116610 CITI -CARGO & STORAGE CO. INC. 122.48 CONTAINER RENTAL 93820 ACC121568 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS 122.48 262627 8/12/2004 103040 CITY PAGES 260.00 ART CENTER AD 93974 07282004 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 260.00 262528 811212004 106693 CITYSPRINT 10.10 COURIER 93890 10781 -1916 1180.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 10.10 262629 8/12/2004 100689 CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP. 121.00 DOOR PADDLE 93821 42191 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 121.00 CENT SVC PW BUILDING ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ELECTION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/12/2004 —8/12/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 262630 811212004 102122 CLINNET SOLUTIONS LLC 152.00 DRUG TESTING 93785 815767 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL 152.00 262631 811212004 100693 COMMERCIAL FURNITURE BROKERS 202.35 VERTICLE FILES 93822 00089845 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS 202.35 262532 8/12/1004 101395 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION 3,529.20 CRS -2 93915 T7921300027595 1301.6518 BLACKTOP 3.529.20 262633 811212004 101323 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS 217.38 PANTS, EARMUFFS 93708 02370947 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 31.76 GLOVES, EARPLUGS 93823 02372978 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 71.80 GLOVES, EARPLUGS 93823 02372978 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 320.94 262634 8/1212004 100698 COPY EQUIPMENT INC. 23.13 ENGR TAPE 93916 0288577 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 94.66 AUTO CAD PAPER 93917 0287279 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 117.79 262535 811212004 116840 COSTELLO, ANNE 7.31 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 93976 080604 1624.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 7.31 262536 8/12/2004 101915 COUNTRY FLAGS 707.16 CITY FLAGS 93786 9921 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 707.16 262637 8/12/2004 116179 CURB MASTERS INC. 47,686.67 CITY HALL/POLICE FACILITY 93910 062404 4400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 47,686.67 262638 811212004 100701 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO. 89.29 WIRE, TIRES 93709 127726 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 89.29 262639 8/12/2004 116834 DAHLBERG, MARY 12.00 PROGRAM REFUND 93710 080304 600.4390.33 WIN TWINS FIELD TRIP 8/11/2004 10:14:15 Page - 6 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING BUILDING MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING GENERAL ENGINEERING GENERAL PLAYGROUND 8 THEATER CONTINGENCIES CITY HALL/POLICE BUILDING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PARK ADMIN. GENEF R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/12/2004 - 8/12/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description AMBULANCE FEES AMBULANCE FEES 8/1112004 10:14:15 Page - 7 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WIN TWINS FIELD TRIP PSTF OCCUPANCY PARK ADMIN. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 12.00 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 262640 811212004 GRILL 116849 DAHLIEN, LLOYD 623.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 94176 080904 1470.4329 623.00 262641 8/12/2004 116848 DAHLIEN, MILDRED 780.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 94175 080904 1470.4329 780.00 262642 8/1212004 101581 DAKOTA COUNTY TECHNICAL COLLEG 330.00 PURSUIT TRAINING 93977 080304 1400.6104 330.00 262643 8/12/2004 116830 DANA WHEELOCK PHOTOGRAPHY 905.25 IMAGE PHOTOS 93711 1759 7411.6103 905.25 262644 8/12/2004 112917 DAVIS, ANNE 24.00 PROGRAM REFUND 93712 080304 1600.4390.33 24.00 262645 8112/2004 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING 116.00 93852 275429 5842.5513 2,943.65 93853 275503 5842.5514 38.00 93854 275504 5842.5515 1,647,20 94063 275449 5822.5514 4,744.85 262646 8/1212004 100720 DENNYS 6TH AVE. BAKERY 63.90 BAKERY 93713 173080 5421.5510 42.18 BAKERY 93714 173041 5421.5510 19.06 BAKERY 93918 173235 5421.5510 23.40 BAKERY 93978 173327 5421.5510 42.56 BAKERY 93979 173339 5421.5510 191.10 262647 8112/2004 102712 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION 37.00 WAN USAGE - MARCH 93980 DVO4060294 1554.6230 37.00 262648 8/1212004 101675 DESHLER, BRANDON AMBULANCE FEES AMBULANCE FEES 8/1112004 10:14:15 Page - 7 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WIN TWINS FIELD TRIP PSTF OCCUPANCY PARK ADMIN. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/12/2004 - 8/12/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 127.50 REIMBURSE NEXTEL 93891 080404 1400.6188 TELEPHONE 1314.6517 1314.6517 5440.5511 5423.6530 5842.5513 5862.5513 5822.5513 1325.6531 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK SAND GRAVEL & ROCK 8/11/2004 10:14:15 Page - 8 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL STREET RENOVATION STREET RENOVATION COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES REPAIR PARTS GOLF CARS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD VINE 50TH ST SELLING SIGNS & POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS 5430.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 127.50 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 262649 8112/2004 GRILL 101747 DRESSER TRAP ROCK INC. COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 24,286.11 FA -2 93715 52532 8,172.01 FA -2 93824 52642 32,458.12 262650 811212004 114116 DUSHANE, DAVE 300.00 GOLF BALLS 93919 56547 300.00 262551 8/1212004 100736 E-Z-GO TEXTRON 19.80 BATTERY, CHARGES 93716 1434654 19.80 262562 811212004 100739 EAGLE WINE 1,064.85 93855 928083 1,236.44 94064 928073 1,332.25 94065 928079 3,633.54 262653 8/12/2004 100740 EARL F. ANDERSEN INC. 522.63 TRAFFIC CONES 93920 0061161 -IN 522.63 262654 811212004 100741 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 111.60 93717 212658 4,619.75 93856 322819 538.00 93921 13287 1,238.95 94066 322896 25.70 94067 322912 6,480.30 94068 322911 13,014.30 262655 811212004 100742 ECOLAB PEST ELIMINATION DMSI 141.65 PEST CONTROL 93787 3677499 141.65 262666 8/12/2004 102966 EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS 394.37 FIELD TRIPS 93981 04-0052 394.37 1314.6517 1314.6517 5440.5511 5423.6530 5842.5513 5862.5513 5822.5513 1325.6531 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK SAND GRAVEL & ROCK 8/11/2004 10:14:15 Page - 8 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL STREET RENOVATION STREET RENOVATION COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES REPAIR PARTS GOLF CARS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD VINE 50TH ST SELLING SIGNS & POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS 5430.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5630.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTENNIAL LAKES 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 8/11/2004 10:14:15 Page - 9 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN TREES & MAINTENANCE ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION COMMUNICATIONS ADMINISTRATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COMMUNICATIONS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 8/12/2004 — 8/12/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 262667 8/12/2004 116448 EGAN OIL COMPANY 12,955.18 GAS 93825 89159 1553.6581 GASOLINE 12,955.18 262668 811212004 106294 EKLUND MULCH SALES 1,708.28 WOOD MULCH 93788 00590 1644.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES 1,708.28 262659 8/1212004 116080 ENO, SARA 450.00 WORKSHOP 94184 080504 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 450.00 262660 811212004 105339 ENRGI 282.50 WEBSITE DEVELOPMENT 93982 1774 2210.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT 282.50 262661 811212004 106204 ERDAHL AERIAL PHOTOS 133.66 AIR PHOTOS 93983 16011 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 133.66 262662 811212004 100018 EXPERT T BILLING 5,400.00 JULY TRANSPORTS 93826 080304 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5,400.00 262663 811212004 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 519.93 ROTORS & PADS 93827 6- 665878 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES 519.93 262564 811212004 100297 FAST FOTO & DIGITAL 2.40 PHOTO PROCESSING 93984 T2- 186796 2210.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 130.78 SAFETY CAMP PHOTOS 93985 T2- 186886 1600.4390.06 SAFETY CAMP 133.18 262666 8112/2004 116860 FISCHBACH, REGINA 117.32 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 94177 080904 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES 117.32 262566 8/1212004 102016 FLOWERS OF EDINA 115.02 OPEN HOUSE FLOWERS 93986 2144 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 68.16 OPEN HOUSE FLOWERS 93987 2145 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 183.18 8/11/2004 10:14:15 Page - 9 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN TREES & MAINTENANCE ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION COMMUNICATIONS ADMINISTRATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COMMUNICATIONS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/11/2004 10:14:15 Council Check Register Page - 10 8/12/2004 — 8/12/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 262567 811212004 100764 G & K SERVICES 52.19 93922 073104 5511.6201 LAUNDRY ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 155.85 93922 073104 5911.6201 LAUNDRY PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER 375.37 93922 073104 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 403.05 93922 073104 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 538.44 93922 073104 1553.6201 LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 745.53 93922 073104 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 2,270.43 262568 8/12/2004 102466 GALLS INC. 2,495.30 LAPTOP MOUNTS 93892 5718879801019 1400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2,495.30 262569 8/12/2004 100773 GENERAL PARTS INC. 134.90 TIMER DEFROST 93830 616887 5111.6530 REPAIR PARTS ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 134.90 262670 811212004 100775 GENERAL SPORTS CORPORATION 180.00 T- SHIRTS 93988 67918 4077.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 180.00 262571 8/12/2004 100920 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY - MINNEA 650.17 PARTS 93893 073104 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 650.17 262672 8/12/2004 112779 GEPHART ELECTRIC CO. INC. 19,106.40 CITY HALL/POLICE FACILITY 93911 APPL 14 4400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CITY HALUPOLICE BUILDING 19,106.40 262573 8/12/2004 104652 GILLIS, LOUISE 672.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 94185 080504 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 672.00 262574 8/12/2004 101344 GLENN REHBEIN EXCAVATING INC 123,447.75 ATHLETIC FIELD RENOVATION 93989 APPL #3 47032.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT RENOVATE W FLD LEWIS & LIGHTS 123,447.75 262576 8/1212004 102877 GLENWOOD WATER 145.69 ACCT 6091800 93990 073104 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 145.69 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/11/2004 10:14:15 Council Check Register Page - 11 8/12/2004 - 8/12/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 262676 811212004 101679 GOLFCRAFT 75.00 GOLF CLUBS 93991 17996 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 75.00 262577 81128004 100776 GOODIN COMPANY 91.26 CLOSET PARTS KITS 93718 1997250-00 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 5610.6136 1553.6530 1553.6585 5862.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5862.5513 5822.5513 4091.6406 5842.5515 5842.5512 5842.5512 5842.5515 5842.5512 5842.5512 5842.5512 5822.5515 5822.5512 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER REPAIR PARTS ACCESSORIES COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE GENERAL SUPPLIES ED ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING GRANDVIEW REVOLVING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 91.25 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 262678 8/128004 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 102169 GOODWIN, DON COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 150.00 PERFORMANCE 882/04 93719 070804 150.00 262679 8/12/2004 101103 GRAINGER 80.73 BATTERIES, PAINT 93828 495 - 785857 -6 112.72 SPRAY PAINT 93992 495-005640-0 193.45 262580 81128004 102670 GRAND PERE WINES INC 347.00 94069 14180 2,151.80 94070 14190 2,498.80 262681 8/128004 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 1,348.00 94071 66023 360.00 94072 65964 1,362.00 94073 66021 3,070.00 262682 8/12/2004 101360 GREEN ACRES SPRINKLER CO. 309.27 IRRIGATION START/REPAIRS 93829 041365 309.27 262683 81128004 100782 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. 113.60 93857 928087 113.68 93858 928086 2,597.06 93859 928085 144.65 93860 928084 3,374.35 93861 927996 1,221.43 93862 926742 84.50 93863 926229 43.10- 93864 644642 1,499.75- 93865 644641 5610.6136 1553.6530 1553.6585 5862.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5862.5513 5822.5513 4091.6406 5842.5515 5842.5512 5842.5512 5842.5515 5842.5512 5842.5512 5842.5512 5822.5515 5822.5512 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER REPAIR PARTS ACCESSORIES COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE GENERAL SUPPLIES ED ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING GRANDVIEW REVOLVING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/11/2004 10:14:15 Council Check Register Page - 12 8/12/2004 - 8/12/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 562.60 94074 926084 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,793.53 94075 928081 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 104.35 94076 928080 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 2,767.28 94077 924400 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,996.11 94078 926085 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,652.02 94079 928076 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3,373.50 94080 928010 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 310.11 94081 928075 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,170.15 94082 926737 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 216.80 94083 928077 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 459.00- 94084 645268 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 23,593.87 262684 8/1212004 100786 GROTH MUSIC 85.50 SHEET MUSIC 93993 889477 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 85.50 262586 811212004 100840 GUSTAFSON, KATHY 660.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 94186 080504 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 660.00 262686 811212004 101964 GUSTAVE A. LARSON CO. 139.69 SOLENOID BODY COIL 93720 PLY0209864 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 139.69 262687 8/1212004 102312 HARMON INC. 584.00 DOOR REPAIR 93994 285017608 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 584.00 262588 811212004 100797 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT 1,465.15 POOL CHEMICALS 93995 638717 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 20.00 CONTAINER DEMURRAGE 93996 DM106255 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 1,485.15 262589 811212004 116838 HAYES INSTRUMENT CO INC 25.97 TAPES 93923 416710 1260.6577 LUMBER ENGINEERING GENERAL 8.83 TAPES 93924 417222 1260.6577 LUMBER ENGINEERING GENERAL 29.76 TAPE 93925 417252 1260.6577 LUMBER ENGINEERING GENERAL 44.38 SURVEYING SUPPLIES 93926 417578 1240.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL 108.94 262690 81121200 101676 HEGGIES PIZZA R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/1212004 - 811212004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 147.35 PIZZA 93997 113493 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES Business Unit GRILL K -9 UNIT 8/11/2004 10:14:15 Page - 13 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF DOME PROGRAM SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA ADMINISTRATION ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSPECTIONS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS PARKING RAMP PARKING RAMP PARKING RAMP PARKING RAMP PARKING RAMP 147.35 262691 8/1212004 100806 HIRSHFIELD'S 307.27 PAINT & SUNDRIES 93998 032161148 1438.6406 307.27 262692 8/12/2004 104376 HOHENSTEINS INC. 182.00 94085 336706 5862.5514 182.00 262693 8112/2004 101774 HONEYWELL INC. 5,970.90 MECHANICAL MAINTENANCE 93999 2849175 5210.6230 7,371.81 MECHANICAL MAINTENANCE 93999 2849175 5620.6230 9,702.71 MECHANICAL MAINTENANCE 93999 2849175 5510.6136 23,045.42 262694 8112/2004 101040 HOPKINS TOWN & COUNTRY DODGE 56.79 CLAMP 94000 106207 1553.6585 56.79 262696 8/1212004 106007 HUTCHINSON TELEPHONE COMPANY 6,692.64 MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 94001 HTCINV005548 1400.6230 6,692.64 262596 811212004 101486 ICMA 914.30 DUES 94002 070104 1120.6105 914.30 262597 8/12/2004 104167 INTERNATIONAL CODE COUNCIL 40.00 CERTIFICATION RENEWAL 93789 080104 1495.6103 40.00 262698 811212004 116786 IPM GROUP INC. 118.40 PAINT 93927 280025193 1375.6530 118.75- CREDIT 93928 280025299 1375.6530 30.10 ACRYLIC 93929 280025300 1375.6530 37.90 PAINT 93930 280025333 1375.6530 36.55 PAINT 93931 280025672 1375.6530 104.20 262699 811212004 106026 J & R LARSON GROUNDS MAINTENAN GENERAL SUPPLIES Business Unit GRILL K -9 UNIT 8/11/2004 10:14:15 Page - 13 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF DOME PROGRAM SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA ADMINISTRATION ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSPECTIONS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS PARKING RAMP PARKING RAMP PARKING RAMP PARKING RAMP PARKING RAMP R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date 262600 8/1212004 262601 811212004 262602 8/12/2004 262603 8/12/2004 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/12/2004 - 8/12/2004 Amount Vendor / Explanation PO 8 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 851.25 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 93790 117065 5630.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 851.25 101861 J.H. LARSON COMPANY 24.39 CONNECTORS 93721 4425208-01 338.73 SIGNAL LIGHTS 93722 4424626-01 363.12 116844 JACKPOT JUNCTION CASINO HOTEL 95.86 CONFERENCE LODGING 94003 080904 95.86 100829 JERRY'S HARDWARE 3.98 93932 073104 7.98 93932 073104 12.97 93932 073104 15.78 93932 073104 21.27 93932 073104 31.26 93932 073104 32.35 93932 073104 37.47 93932 073104 52.04 93932 073104 55.47 93932 073104 62.63 93932 073104 69.18 93932 073104 102.62 93932 073104 125.43 93932 073104 137.19 93932 073104 169.63 93932 073104 181.98 93932 073104 219.01 93932 073104 219.22 93932 073104 316.41 93932 073104 320.93 93932 073104 349.47 93932 073104 405.91 93932 073104 751.24 93932 073104 3,701.42 100830 JERRY'S PRINTING 38.34 INSPECTION FORMS 93933 29968 38.34 1552.6530 1330.6406 1190.6104 4091.6406 1495.6406 1322.6406 5860.6406 7411.6406 5511.6406 1643.6406 5424.6406 1260.6406 1325.6406 1553.6406 1400.6406 5422.6406 5420.6406 4090.6406 1551.6406 5311.6406 5620.6406 5911.6406 1552.6406 5630.6406 1470.6406 1301.6406 1646.6406 1260.6406 REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 8111/2004 10:14:15 Page- 14 Business Unit CENTENNIAL LAKES CENT SVC PW BUILDING TRAFFIC SIGNALS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GRANDVIEW REVOLVING INSPECTIONS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL PSTF OCCUPANCY ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS GENERAL TURF CARE RANGE ENGINEERING GENERAL STREET NAME SIGNS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN POLICE DEPT. GENERAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CLUB HOUSE STREET REVOLVING CITY HALL GENERAL POOL OPERATION EDINBOROUGH PARK PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENTENNIAL LAKES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/11/2004 10:14:15 Council Check Register Page - 15 8/12/2004 - 8/12/2004 Check # Date 262606 8112/2004 262606 8/1212004 262607 811212004 Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No 100836 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. .90 94086 968.81 94087 640.00 94088 1,657.79 94089 856.39 94090 743.81 94091 24.90 94092 .23 94094 3,881.58 94095 398.02 94096 1,644.99 94097 6,674.58 94098 125.85 94099 180.90 94100 184.89 94101 1,703.81 94102 4,120.34 94103 7,985.60 94104 3,140.51 94105 5,696.66 94106 1,529.33 94107 .90 94108 401.75 94109 275.92 94110 201.25- 94111 14.48- 94112 36.00 - 94113 70.75 - 94114 42,515.98 Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1759804 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1758477 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1751587 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1762007 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1762008 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1762006 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1762009 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1759806 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1758483 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1762016 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1762017 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1762012 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1762010 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1762013 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1762014 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1762015 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1762011 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1758495 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1758492 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1762019 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1762020 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1759808 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1762018 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1762021 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 256824 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 256657 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 256658 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 256659 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 116625 JOHNSON, JEAN 216.00 MODEL 94187 080504 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 216.00 104369 KARKHOFF, NANCY 59.71 UNIFORM REIMBURSEMENT 93894 080404 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 59.71 ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 262608 8112/2004 114276 KELLEHER, KEVIN 54.10 TRAINING VIDEO 93934 080504 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/11/2004 10:14:15 Council Check Register Page - 16 8/12/2004 - 8/12/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 54.10 262609 811212004 100846 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO 4,149.00 94115 408761 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 70.00 94116 408762 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 4,219.00 262610 811212004 114117 LANG, CHARLOTTE 360.00 WORKSHOP MODEL 94188 080504 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 360.00 262611 811212004 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 249.97 O- RINGS, RIVETS, NUTS 93723 2257164 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 99.80 HOLESAWS, NUTS 94004 2276303 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 349.77 262612 8112/2004 106236 LITTLE, LAURA 72.68 PLAYGROUND SUPPLIES 94005 080504 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 219.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 94006 080604 1624.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PLAYGROUND & THEATER 291.68 262613 8112/2004 112677 M. AMUNDSON LLP 406.88 CANDY 93791 164024 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 406.88 262614 811212004 101741 M. SHANKEN COMMUNICATIONS INC. 15.00 WINE SPECTATOR 93724 111319 5820.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 50TH STREET GENERAL 15.00 262615 8/1212004 100864 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. 2,185.38 BROOMS 94007 2045318 1310.6523 BROOMS STREET CLEANING 2,185.38 262616 8/12/2004 114699 MANAGED SERVICES INC. 420.68 JANITORIAL SERVICE 93935 606407 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 420.68 262617 8/1212004 102981 MARATHON ASHLAND PETROLEUM LLC 4,541.69 CRS-2 93725 110064 1314.6519 ROAD OIL STREET RENOVATION 90.00 TRAILER RENTAL 93726 081183 1314.6519 ROAD OIL STREET RENOVATION 60.00 TRAILER RENTAL 93727 081179 1314.6519 ROAD OIL STREET RENOVATION 60.00 TRAILER RENTAL 93728 081177 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTEN' 5822.5514 5822.5515 5842.5514 5842.5514 5842.5515 5430.5514 5822.5514 5822.5514 5822.5515 5842.5514 5842.5514 5842.5514 5842.5515 5862.5514 5862.5515 5862.5514 5862.5514 1280.6104 1507.6103 1160.6103 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COST OF GOODS SOLD 8/11/2004 10:14:15 Page - 17 Business Unit STREET RENOVATION STREET RENOVATION STREET RENOVATION BRIDGES GUARD RAILS 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING SUPERVISION 6 OVERHEAD FAMILINK EDINA FINANCE ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 9,655.50 CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 262618 8112/2004 100868 MARK VII SALES Councal Check Register 1,203.50 93866 696879 8/12/2004 - 8/1212004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 4,723.81 CRS-2 93729 118333 1314.6519 ROAD OIL 60.00 TRAILER RENTAL 93730 081350 1314.6519 ROAD OIL 60.00 TRAILER RENTAL 93731 081300 1314.6519 ROAD OIL 60.00 TRAILER RENTAL 93831 081515 1343.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5822.5514 5822.5515 5842.5514 5842.5514 5842.5515 5430.5514 5822.5514 5822.5514 5822.5515 5842.5514 5842.5514 5842.5514 5842.5515 5862.5514 5862.5515 5862.5514 5862.5514 1280.6104 1507.6103 1160.6103 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COST OF GOODS SOLD 8/11/2004 10:14:15 Page - 17 Business Unit STREET RENOVATION STREET RENOVATION STREET RENOVATION BRIDGES GUARD RAILS 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING SUPERVISION 6 OVERHEAD FAMILINK EDINA FINANCE ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 9,655.50 262618 8112/2004 100868 MARK VII SALES 1,203.50 93866 696879 16.00 93867 696880 5,307.30 93868 697167 93.25 93869 697169 14.80 93870 697168 211.50 93936 697029 3,019.46 94117 699532 1,759.00 94118 697145 36.80 94119 697146 3,556.88 94120 699539 59.00 94121 699540 648.00 94122 699541 61.30 94123 699542 4,368.35 94124 697147 123.85 94125 696877 5,088.40 94126 696876 86.05 94127 697148 25,653.44 262619 811212004 103280 MARLIN COMPANY, THE 586.57 COMMUNICATIONS PROGRAM 93732 293955 586.57 262620 8/1212004 108891 MASSEY, JEANNE 1,530.00 PREPARATION/INTERVIEWS 94008 04 -0002 -02 1,530.00 262621 8/1212004 116432 MASTERSON PERSONNEL INC. 64.00 TEMP SERVICE 93792 72821 64.00 262622 8112/2004 101030 MATHISON CO. 210.90 CANVAS, OILS, PAPER 93832 573752 -0 210.90 5822.5514 5822.5515 5842.5514 5842.5514 5842.5515 5430.5514 5822.5514 5822.5514 5822.5515 5842.5514 5842.5514 5842.5514 5842.5515 5862.5514 5862.5515 5862.5514 5862.5514 1280.6104 1507.6103 1160.6103 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COST OF GOODS SOLD 8/11/2004 10:14:15 Page - 17 Business Unit STREET RENOVATION STREET RENOVATION STREET RENOVATION BRIDGES GUARD RAILS 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING SUPERVISION 6 OVERHEAD FAMILINK EDINA FINANCE ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/11/2004 10:14:15 Council Check Register Page - 18 8/12/2004 -8/12/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 262623 8/1212004 102600 MATRIX COMMUNICATIONS INC 232.50 PHONE SERVICE 94009 19104 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 232.50 262624 811212004 100870 MATRX 685.31 NITRILE GLOVES 94010 860906 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 685.31 262626 8/12/2004 101483 MENARDS 81.65 BLEACH, HANDTOOLS 93733 47609 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 10.64- RETURN 93734 48286 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 19.12 HANDTOOLS 93735 48295 1646.6556 TOOLS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 76.33 CONCRETE MIX, HANDTOOLS 93736 47946 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 27.67 VULKEM LIMESTONE 93793 48587 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 194.13 262626 8/12/2004 101987 MENARDS 157.58 FAN, MOULDING, ADHESIVE 94011 9944 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 157.58 262627 811212004 106042 METROPOLITAN AIRPORTS COMMISSI 956.41 FFY2004 93937 080404 1434.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SAFE & SOBER GRANT 2,084.09 2004 MAY MOBILIZATION 93937 080404 1434.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SAFE & SOBER GRANT 3,040.50 262628 8/1212004 100886 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 2,673.00 JULY 2004 93895 080104 1495.4307 SAC CHARGES INSPECTIONS 2,673.00 262629 811212004 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAI 712.28 ROTORS, SHAFTS 93833 434726FOW 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 712.28 262630 811212004 100891 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. 51.91 TAX ON INV 72315MB 93794 72315TAX 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE 798.95 TAX ON INV 72315MB 93794 72315TAX 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 850.86 262631 811212004 100692 MIDWEST COCA -COLA EAGAN 192.80 93871 87229198 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 192.80 8/11/2004 10:14:15 Page - 19 Business Unit ADAPTIVE RECREATION PLAYGROUND & THEATER PATHS & HARD SURFACE DISTRIBUTION RICHARDS GOLF COURSE GRILL 96 09 JULY SERVICE 94016 CD31989 5620.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK 96.09 CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 262637 811212004 112908 MINNESOTA ROADWAYS CO. Council Check Register CRS-II 93738 46094 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 8/12/2004 — 8112/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 262632 8/1212004 102873 MILLER, SUSAN 5,209.61 JULY 2004 93896 080204 17.98 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 94012 080604 1629.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 209.84 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 94012 080604 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 227.82 15.72 SPRAYER TIPS 262633 8/12/2004 1643.6530 102007 MINNCOR INDUSTRIES 15.72 2,430.86 PARK BENCHES 93737 97352 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,430.86 203.54 WINDOW SHADE PARTS 262634 811212004 5620.6530 103216 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPARTMENT 203.54 24,855.61 WATER PURCHASE 94013 080404 5913.6601 WATER PURCHASED 100912 MOTOROLA INC. 24,855.61 262635 8/12/2004 102174 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 5.61 PROPANE 94014 R107040350 5430.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 49.20 CYLINDERS 94015 KF789801 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 54.81 262636 811212004 100903 MINNESOTA ELEVATOR INC 8/11/2004 10:14:15 Page - 19 Business Unit ADAPTIVE RECREATION PLAYGROUND & THEATER PATHS & HARD SURFACE DISTRIBUTION RICHARDS GOLF COURSE GRILL 96 09 JULY SERVICE 94016 CD31989 5620.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK GENERAL MAINTENANCE INSPECTIONS GENERAL TURF CARE EDINBOROUGH PARK 549,701.94 PUBLIC SAFETY RADIOS 94018 41059472 44003.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 800 MHZ RADIO 549,701.94 96.09 262637 811212004 112908 MINNESOTA ROADWAYS CO. 97.77 CRS-II 93738 46094 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 97.77 262638 8112/2004 100899 MINNESOTA STATE TREASURER 5,209.61 JULY 2004 93896 080204 1495.4380 SURCHARGE 5,209.61 262639 811212004 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER 15.72 SPRAYER TIPS 93739 0061456 -IN 1643.6530 REPAIR PARTS 15.72 262640 8/12/2004 105439 MODE LITE WINDOW SHADE CO. 203.54 WINDOW SHADE PARTS 94017 4192 5620.6530 REPAIR PARTS 203.54 262641 8/12/2004 100912 MOTOROLA INC. GENERAL MAINTENANCE INSPECTIONS GENERAL TURF CARE EDINBOROUGH PARK 549,701.94 PUBLIC SAFETY RADIOS 94018 41059472 44003.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 800 MHZ RADIO 549,701.94 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/11/2004 10:14:15 262660 811212004 100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY Council Check Register 162.45 Page - 20 93836 30266600 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 179.30 8/12/2004 - 8/12/2004 30254900 5120.5510 Check # Date Amount Vendor/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 262642 8/1212004 100906 MITI DISTRIBUTING INC. 126.89 TIRES 93742 NW -91314 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES 117.80 104.07 PARTS 93795 424689 -00 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS - CENTENNIAL LAKES 14.30 WIRE 94019 422202 -00 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 118.37 262643 8112/2004 100916 MUZAK - NORTH CENTRAL 185.79 MUSIC SERVICE 94020 107228 5630.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTENNIAL LAKES 185.79 262644 8/12/2004 100921 NATIONAL CAMERA EXCHANGE 73.14 DEVELOPING ITEMS 93834 071440710GQ 5125.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES MEDIA STUDIO 73.14 262646 811212004 103632 NEXT DAY GOURMET 93.67 KETTLE HANDLE 93740 8318592 5320.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL CONCESSIONS 93.67 262646 8/12/2004 104672 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 135.52 93741 737969523002 1495.6188 TELEPHONE INSPECTIONS 205.40 94021 371730326 -012 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 340.92 262647 811212004 101190 NORTHERN TRAFFIC SUPPLY INC. 1,117.45 SIGNS 93835 24 -9120 1325.6531 SIGNS & POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS 1,117.45 262648 8/12/2004 106023 NORTHLAND PAVING 55,005.00 CITY HALLIPOLICE FACILITY 93912 APPL 3 4400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CITY HALUPOLICE BUILDING 55,005.00 262649 811212004 106410 NORTHWEST ATHLETIC CLUB 2 000 00 CORPORATE WELLNESS 94022 072904 1400.6037 FITNESS REIMBURSEMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2,000.00 262660 811212004 100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY 162.45 D'ARCHES, CHARCOAL 93836 30266600 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 179.30 ART SUPPLIES 93837 30254900 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 341.75 262661 811212004 100930 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO. 126.89 TIRES 93742 NW -91314 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES 117.80 TIRES 93743 NW -91316 553.6583 TIRES & TUBES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERA' 'EN CITY OF EDINA 8/11/2004 10:14:15 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page' 21 8/1212004 - 8/12/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 68.88 TIRES 93744 NW -91290 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 313.57 262652 8/1212004 100729 ODLAND, DOROTHY 480.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 94189 080504 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 480.00 262663 811=004 106669 OESTREICH, RICHARD 59.97 UNIFORM PURCHASE 93745 080204 5911.6201 LAUNDRY PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER 59.97 262664 8/12/2004 102860 OFFICE DEPOT 60.64 OFFICE SUPPLIES 93796 072804 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 61.95 OFFICE SUPPLIES 93796 072804 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 122.59 262666 811212004 101692 OFFICEMAX CREDIT PLAN 15.91 OFFICE SUPPLIES 94023 072304 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 200.54 OFFICE SUPPLIES 94023 072304 5610.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ED ADMINISTRATION 216.45 262666 8112/2004 101669 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 90.53 PEST CONTROL 93797 5604085 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL 90.53 262667 8/12/2004 100939 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC. 141.96 COOKIES 93798 75368443 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 97.24 COOKIES 93938 73828343 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 239.20 262658 811212004 113731 PAPA JOHNS 120.25 PIZZA - 94024 080604 1623.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TENNIS INSTRUCTION 120.25 262659 8/12/2004 101718 PARTS PLUS 814.39 PARTS 93746 072604 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 814.39 262660 8/12/2004 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 1,551.00 93872 8042036 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,370.60 94128 8043265 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,420.00 94129 8043268 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/1212004 - 8/12/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 2,910.68 94130 8043267 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 8/11/2004 10:14:15 Page - 22 Business Unit 50TH ST SELLING CENT SERV GEN - MIS CENT SERV GEN - MIS 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 7,252.28 5630.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES 262661 811212004 POOL CONCESSIONS 110832 PC2 SOLUTIONS, INC. COST OF GOODS SOLD RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 1438.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 350.00 COMPUTER WORK 94025 73104006 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 245.00 COMPUTER WORK 94026 70304008 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 595.00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 262662 811212004 VERNON SELLING 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 1,050.00 5862.5513 93747 64058401 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 920.25 5842.5514 93799 65269731 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 95.35 5842.5515 93800 66384882 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 385.75 5822.5515 93939 65269820 2,451.35 262663 811212004 105806 PERFORMANCE KENNELS INC. 66.86 DOG FOOD 93897 1119 66.66 262664 811212004 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 214.50 94131 2099396 25.30 94132 2099399 1,239.22 94133 2099400 1,892.29 94134 2099402 1,069.50 94135 2099401 942.20 94136 2096876 17.10- 94137 3302659 209.10 94138 2099403 1,161.75 94139 2099404 759.25 94140 2099405 11.25- 94141 3302466 7,484.76 262665 8/1212004 102166 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING 563.68 94142 45401 615.87 94143 45372 16.16 94144 45340 318.74 94145 45311 1,514.45 262666 8/1212004 100962 PRECISION BUSINESS SYSTEMS 849.87 CASSETTE TRANSCRIBER 93898 077540 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 8/11/2004 10:14:15 Page - 22 Business Unit 50TH ST SELLING CENT SERV GEN - MIS CENT SERV GEN - MIS 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 5630.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 1438.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES K -9 UNIT 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING '400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENF CITY OF EDINA 8/11/2004 10:14:15 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 23 8/12/2004 - 8/12/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doe No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 849.87 262667 811212004 333.85 100968 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 93873 926685 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,180.49 93874 928088 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 441.48 93875 924423 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 312.35 94146 926683 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,396.95 94147 928078 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 475.58 94148 928082 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 312.35 94149 926684 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 4,453.05 262668 8/12/2004 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 715.41 CLEANING ITEMS 93801 3366 5630.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 488.14 ROLL TOWEL, CLEANERS 94027 3370 5620.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 1,203.55 262669 8/12/2004 336.00 104669 PURE BLUE FLEXFRAMES, SUN BLOCK 93802 17989 5310.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL ADMINISTRATION 336.00 262671 811212004 3,81_ 100971 QUALITY WINE 93876 436774-00 5840.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 192.25 93876 436774-00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 19,84- 2,014.36 7,35- 93877 93877 93878 436871 -00 436871 -00 436617 -00 5840.5518 5842.5513 5840.5518 VENDOR DISCOUNTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VENDOR DISCOUNTS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL YORK SELLING LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 742.66 31.31- 1,578.56 29.08- 80.92- 30.52- 1,537.28 7.57 - 763.59 6.50 - 658.73 5.91 - 297.42 1.50- 150.00 93878 93879 93879 93880 93881 94150 94150 94151 94151 94152 94152 94153 94153 94154 94154 436617 -00 436814 -00 436814 -00 433115.00 432190 -00 436815-00 436815 -00 436616 -00 436616 -00 436884 -00 436884 -00 433703 -00 433703 -00 437570 -00 437570 -00 5842.5513 5840.5518 5842.5512 5842.5513 5842.5513 5820.5518 5822.5512 5820:5518 5822.5513 5820.5518 5822.5513 5840.5518 5842.5512 5840.5518 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VENDOR DISCOUNTS COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VENDOR DISCOUNTS COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VENDOR DISCOUNTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VENDOR DISCOUNTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VENDOR DISCOUNTS COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VENDOR DISCOUNTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING LIQUOR YORK GENERAL YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH STREET GENERAL 50TH ST SELLING 50TH STREET GENERAL 50TH ST SELLING 50TH STREET GENERAL 50TH ST SELLING LIQUOR YORK GENERAL YORK SELLING LIQUOR YORK GENERAL YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Vendor! Explanation 56.05- 2,823.38 12.37- 1,252.46 11.39- 1,156.58 12,863.17 262672 8/12/2004 101965 CIWEST 2.42 952 829 -9560 101.83 952 920 -8752 68.31 200.69 235.93 3,384.92 90.91 4,085.01 262673 8/1212004 57.47 87.23 97.78 140.75 162.76 191.40 214.39 217.49 237.51 252.99 349.43 2,807.21 4,816.41 262674 811212004 149.07 149.07 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register. 8/12/2004 - 8/12/2004 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 94155 436767 -00 5860.5518 94155 436767 -00 5862.5512 94156 436876 -00 5860.5518 94156 436876 -00 5862.5513 94157 436872 -00 5860.5518 94157 436872 -00 5862.5513 103478 CIWEST REGIONAL BILL 14562 REGIONAL BILL 14562 REGIONAL BILL 14562 REGIONAL BILL 14562 REGIONAL BILL 14562 REGIONAL BILL 14562 REGIONAL BILL 14562 REGIONAL BILL 14562 REGIONAL BILL 14562 REGIONAL BILL 14562 REGIONAL BILL 14562 REGIONAL BILL 14562 112562 RADIO SHACK CORPORATION CABLE 262676 8/1212004 104262 RAMADA INN 193.02 K9 TRIALS LODGING 193.02 262676 8/12/200 101698 RECREONICS 93803 072804 93804 JUL28 94028 612 Z28-0146 94028 612 Z28 -0146 94028 612 Z28 -0146 94028 612 Z28 -0146 94029 080104 93805 072504 93805 072504 93805. 072504 93805 072504 93805 072504 93805 072504 93805 072504 93805 072504 93805 072504 93805 072504 93805 072504 93805 072504 93940 079781 93899 L01801 1622.6188 1550.6188 1646.6188 1622.6188 1470.6188 1550.6188 1646.6188 1628.6188 5861.6188 5841.6188 5821.6188 1622.6188 1470.6188 5610.6188 1646.6188 5932.6188 5511.6188 5911.6188 1550.6188 5424.6406 1438.6104 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS K -9 UNIT 8/1112004 10:14:15 Page- 24 Subledger Account Description Business Unit VENDOR DISCOUNTS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING VENDOR DISCOUNTS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING VENDOR DISCOUNTS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 'TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE TELEPHONE SENIOR CITIZENS TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL TELEPHONE ED ADMINISTRATION TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE TELEPHONE GENERAL STORM SEWER TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS TELEPHONE PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS K -9 UNIT R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/12/2004 - 8/12/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 211.70 LADDER STEPS 93748 337179 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SAFETY EQUIPMENT ADVERTISING LEGAL ADVERTISING LEGAL GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 8/11/2004 10:14:15 Page - 25 Business Unit POOL OPERATION GENERAL MAINTENANCE ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION MEDIA STUDIO MEDIA STUDIO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SAFE & SOBER GRANT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SAFE & SOBER GRANT PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS K -9 UNIT HAZ. WASTE DISPOSAL COST OF GOODS SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD VANVALKENBURG SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 211.70 262677 811212004 100976 RED WING SHOE STORE 147.90 SAFETY BOOTS 94030 7250000000156 1301.6610 147.90 262678 8112/2004 101111 REED BUSINESS INFORMATION 139.43 AD FOR BID 93806 2649522 1120.6120 108.87 AD FOR BID 93807 2649521 1120.6120 248.30 262679 811212004 100842 RETAIL SERVICES 72.38 CARTRIDGES 93941 07130400103577 5125.6406 48.97 BATTERIES, DVC 93942 07120400103468 5125.6406 121.35 262680 8/12/2004 116630 RICHFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT 1,130.99 FFY2004 93943 080404 1434.6103 2,488.50 2004 MAY MOBILIZATION 93943 080404 1434.6103 3,619.49 262681 8/1212004 102011 RIVER CITY JAZZ ORCHESTRA 150.00 PERFORMANCE 8/18/04 93749 080104 5610.6136 150.00 262682 8/12/2004 101979 ROFIDAL, KEVIN 74.78 MEALS /FUEL 93900 072904 1438.6104 74.78 262683 8/12/2004 100988 SAFETY KLEEN 118.66 CHANGE OUT PARTS WASHER 93838 0026628460 1280.6271 118.66 262684 8/12/2004 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 41.32 101- 26373069350 93901 080404 4075.5510 41.32 262686 811212004 104788 SANDY'S PROMOTIONAL STUFF 490.79 WINDOW DECALS 94031 SH4120 1627.640E 490.79 SAFETY EQUIPMENT ADVERTISING LEGAL ADVERTISING LEGAL GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 8/11/2004 10:14:15 Page - 25 Business Unit POOL OPERATION GENERAL MAINTENANCE ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION MEDIA STUDIO MEDIA STUDIO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SAFE & SOBER GRANT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SAFE & SOBER GRANT PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS K -9 UNIT HAZ. WASTE DISPOSAL COST OF GOODS SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD VANVALKENBURG SPECIAL ACTIVITIES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/11/2004 10:14:15 Council Check Register Page - 26 8/12/2004 -8/12/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 262686 811212004 114489 SAVIN CORPORATION 48.00 MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 93944 E072800348 -21 7411.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE PSTF OCCUPANCY 48.00 262687 8112/2004 100896 SBC PAGING 153.83 PAGERS 94032 30343008048 5620.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK 153.83 262688 811212004 100989 SCHAFER EQUIPMENT CO. 187.73 EDGERS, BROOM, LEVEL 94033 208844 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 238.29 CONCRETE TOOLS 94034 208780 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 426.02 262689 8112/2004 100990 SCHARBER & SONS 585.75 ROOF 94035 318796 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 585.75 262690 811212004 106442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO. 61.43 HANDRAIL, BRACKET 93808 457622 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 34.51 NAILS 93945 446512 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 2.19 NAILS 93946 441670 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 98.13 262691 8/12/2004 104161 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP. 467.73 QUARTERLY SERVICE 93750 8101110207 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP 476.82 QUARTERLY BILLING 94036 8101109042 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 944.55 262692 8/1212004 105660 SCRAP METAL PROCESSORS INC. 150.00 CONTAINER RENTAL 93839 D -COEe-4 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 150.00 262693 8/12/2004 102644 SEABOARD PENCIL COMPANY 539.70 PENCILS 93751 3321 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 539.70 262694 6/1212004 100998 SHERWIN WILLIAMS 78.26 PAINT, BRUSHES 93840 4057 -6 1343.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BRIDGES GUARD RAILS 157.33 PAINT, BRUSHES 93841 3527 -5 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 235.59 262695 81121200 116832 SHULT, WANDA 8/11/2004 10:14:15 Page - 27 Business Unit PARK ADMIN. GENERAL CENT SERV GEN - MIS CENT SERV GEN - MIS 5,270.70 93882 CITY OF EDINA 5842.5514 R55CKREG LOG20000 YORK SELLING 23.00 93883 152956 5842.5515 Council Check Register YORK SELLING 127.65 93947 8/12/2004 — 8/12/2004 5430.5514 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 12.00 PROGRAM REFUND 93752 080304 1600.4390.33 WIN TWINS FIELD TRIP 12.00 94159 152952 5822.5515 262696 811212004 104098 SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL 12,000.00 MICROSOFT LICENSING 94037 92841 1554.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 29,730.46 MICROSOFT LICENSING 94037 92841 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING 41,730.46 24.38 PROPANE 262697 811212004 101002 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS INC 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 8/11/2004 10:14:15 Page - 27 Business Unit PARK ADMIN. GENERAL CENT SERV GEN - MIS CENT SERV GEN - MIS 5,270.70 93882 152957 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 23.00 93883 152956 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 127.65 93947 346725 5430.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 659.84 94158 152951 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 25 nc 94159 152952 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION GENERAL MAINTENANCE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 6,106.24 262698 8/12/2004 102203 SOUTHWEST JOURNAL INC. 456.00 ART CENTER AD 94038 62970 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 456.00 262699 811212004 101021 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LLC 24.38 PROPANE 93753 072604 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 24.38 262700 8/1212004 116841 SPRINGER, KARL 50.00 SAFETY CAMP SPEAKER 94039 080604 1600.4390.06 SAFETY CAMP 50.00 262701 8/1212004 101004 SPS COMPANIES 131.98 GASKETS, NUTS 93754 S1058084.001 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS 131.98 262702 8/12/2004 103277 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO INC _ 1,993.50 BUCKET, TOOTH BAR EDGE 93948 SM08415 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES 1,993.50 BUCKET, TOOTH BAR EDGE 93949 SM08414 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES 3,987.00 262703 8/12/2004 101007 _ STAR TRIBUNE 530.25 WANTAD 93809 073104 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL 530.25 262704 8/1212004 106452 STONE, HOLLY ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION GENERAL MAINTENANCE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/12/2004 - 8/12/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 37.30 SUPPLIES 94190 080504 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES 307.50 INSTRUCTOR AC 94190 080504 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERALSUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS TIRES & TUBES ADVERTISING LEGAL TELEPHONE ART WORK SOLD 8/11/2004 10:14:15 Page - 28 Business Unit ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING GENERAL ART CENTER REVENUES SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GRILL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE PATHS & HARD SURFACE LEGAL SERVICES 344.80 262705 8/12/2004 101015 STREICHERS 39.03 BORE SCRUBBER 93902 1203877 1400.6406 179.51 ARMORY CLEANING EQUIPT 93903 1202744 1400.6406 154.37 FLASHLIGHT /BATTERY 94040 445836.1 1400.6406 372.91 262706 811212004 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 22.28 FLASHERS 93842 348962CVW 1553.6530 22.28 262707 8/12/2004 105874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC. 261.95 TIRES 93755 10026567 1553.6583 261.95 262708 8/12/2004 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 123.34 AD FOR BID 93810 711087 1120.6120 123.34 262709 8/12/2004 110674 SUPERIOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIO 60.17 BATTERIES, ANTENNA 94041 6198 1260.6188 60.17 262710 8/12/2004 116837 SWILER, KIM 39.00 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 93904 080104 5101.4413 39.00 262711 811212004 111616 T.D. ANDERSON INC. 35.00 BEERLINE CLEANING 93950 752720 5421.6230 35.00 262712 811212004 113549 TENNIS WEST 9,691.50 ATHLETIC ASSOC FENCES 94042 04-631 1647.6103 478.00 ADDITIONAL FENCE WORK 94043 TC -04639 1647.6103 10,169.50 262713 8/12/2004 101034 THOMSEN & NYBECK 17,566.64 PROSECUTING 93951 198366 1195.6103 17,566.64 GENERALSUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS TIRES & TUBES ADVERTISING LEGAL TELEPHONE ART WORK SOLD 8/11/2004 10:14:15 Page - 28 Business Unit ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ADMINISTRATION ENGINEERING GENERAL ART CENTER REVENUES SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GRILL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE PATHS & HARD SURFACE LEGAL SERVICES CITY OF EDINA a 1 ucwi 1 V. ". 1. R56CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 29 8/12/2004 - 8/12/2004 Check 9 Date Amount Vendor I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 262714 811212004 101036 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 341.80 93756 342688 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 176.00 93952 13595 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 387.15 94044 343472 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 5,608.00 94160 342244 5662.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 51.00 94161 342712 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 573.00 94161 342712 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 7,136.95 262715 811212004 101474 TITLEIST 676.06 GOLF BALLS 93953 1421237 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 676.06 262716 811212004 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 35.60 WELDING SUPPLIES 93757 314773 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 74.03 WELDING GASES 94045 452438 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 24.68 WELDING SUPPLIES 94046 452439 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 134.31 262717 811212004 116836 TOTH, SUE 105.30 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 93905 080104 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 105.30 262718 8/12/2004 114546 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 452.63 LANDSCAPE MANAGEMENT 93954 1373736724 7411.6136 SNOW & LAWN CARE PSTF OCCUPANCY 452.63 262719 811212004 103121 TURTLE BAY BUILDING SERVICE IN 985.13 AUG 04 SERVICES 94047 2766 5620.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINBOROUGH PARK 985.13 262720 811212004 101047 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO 78.40 DOOR BATTERY 93758 220683 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 78.40 262721 8/1212004 116689 UNDERDAHL, ANNA 36.00 PROGRAM REFUND 93759 080304 1600.4390.33 WIN TWINS FIELD TRIP PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 36.00 262722 8/12/2004 100371 UNITED RENTALS 1,870.88 BITS, PLIERS, BATTERIES 93760 41738971001 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/11/2004 10:14:15 Cound Check Register Page - 30 8/12/2004 - 8/1212004 Check # Date Amount Vendor/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 198.42 DRILL 8 BIT RENTAL 94178 41298107 -001 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDINGS 2,069.30 262723 811212004 103298 UPS STORE #1716, THE 29.85 SHIPPING CHGS 93906 073104 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 29.85 262724 8/1212004 101908 US FOODSERVICE INC 38.34 CLEANING PRODUCTS 93761 33204449 5311.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 494.53 CONCESSION PRODUCT 93761 33204449 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 216.41 POPCORN BOXES 93811 33193834 5630.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES 19.10 CLEANERS 94048 33207401 5311.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 384.03 CONCESSION PRODUCT 94048 33207401 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 367.95 FOOD 94049 33206573 5630.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES 1,520.36 262726 811212004 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 275.30 BAGS 93762 540548 5822.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 490.01 BAGS 93843 540549 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 765.31 262726 8/12/2004 101743 WAGERS INC. 130.33 FAX REPAIR 93907 SDIN022499 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 130.33 262727 8/12/2004 116831 WALSH, JANE 12.00 PROGRAM REFUND 93763 080304 1600.4390.33 WIN TWINS FIELD TRIP PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 12.00 262728 8/12/2004 103466 WASTE MANAGEMENT • SAVAGE MN 2,752.15 REFUSE 93844 27494444 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 2,765.61 REFUSE 94050 275218022828 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 5,517.76 262729 811212004 103966 WATER SPECIALTY OF MINNESOTA 1 13.08 PUMP CAM 94051 2746 5620.6530 REPAIR PARTS EDINBOROUGH PARK 13.08 262730 811212004 106306 WEDDINGPAGES INC. 158.40 ADVERTISING 93812 323988 5610.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 158.40 CITY OF EDINA 8/11/2004 10:14:15 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 31 8/12/2004 - 8/12/2004 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 262731 8112/2004 103516 WELLS FARGO BANK MINNESOTA 750.00 CUSTODY FEE 93845 2675671 1000.1303 DUE FROM HRA GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 750.00 262732 8/12/2004 105613 WICKLUND, MITZI 114.32 CLASS EXPENSES 94052 080904 1190.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING 114.32 262733 811212004 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 576.75 94162 32979-00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 725.70 94163 32978 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 598.65 94164 32977 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 6.67- 94165 32845-00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,894.43 262734 811212004 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 1,760.70 94166 101537 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 260.70 94167 102040 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 421.25 94168 102041 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 824.35 94169 102042 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 7.00 - 94170 21451 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 17,71 - 94171 21452 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 7.58 - 94172 21449 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,234.71 262735 8/12/2004 112964 WISCONSIN TURF EQUIPMENT CORP. 66.08 BLADES 93846 475390 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 66.08 262736 8/12/2004 101082 WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY 36.85 GOLF BALLS 93813 61532 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 21.58 GOLF BALLS 93814 61493 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 58.43 262737 8/12/2004 116833 WOODLEY, KATHY 24.00 PROGRAM REFUND 93764 080304 1600.4390.33 WIN TWINS FIELD TRIP PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 24.00 262738 8/12/2004 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 365.00 93884 153370 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 732.75 94173 153392 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 707.50 94174 153440 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation 1,805.25 262740 8/12/2004 101726 XCEL ENERGY 2,175.34 8,809.67 355.94 233.77 26,810.47 119.23 607.41 653.48 4,056.53 141.03 760.32 991.89 166.28 2,242.45 1,016.34 1,209.51 1,383.20 4,785.71 307.48 28.60 1,677.47 20,108.31 19,749.55 6,098.25 104,488.23 262741 8/12/2004 100668 XEROX CORPORATION 111.55 JULY USAGE 396.38 JULY USAGE 353.06 JULY USAGE 860.99 262742 8/12/2004 101091 ZIEGLER INC 345.00 GENERATOR CONTRACT 345.00 262743 8/12/2004 104230 MIDWEST HUG 100.00 USER GROUP REGISTRATION 100.00 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/12/2004 - 8/12/2004 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 93765 1901376459209 93766 0322363655209 93767 0841469985209 93768 0113885804209 93769 1190923893209 93770 0042688577209 93771 1554936687209 93772 1159385995209 93773 2170773325209 93774 0920152567209 93774 0920152567209 93775 2175962411209 93776 1281698281209 93777 2163178392210 93778 0746597713210 93778 0746597713210 93778 0746597713210 93779 1860198788209 93815 1746737629205 93847 0835467448211 94179 2191373085218 94180 2333176393216 94181 2212719485211 94182 1124423268217 7411.6185 1551.6185 5932.6185 1322.6185 1321.6185 5933.6185 5430.6185 5422.6185 5311.6185 1481.6185 1470.6185 5210.6185 4086.6185 1628.6185 5821.6185 5861.6185 5841.6185 1330.6185 5913.6185 1646.6185 5914.6185 1646.6185 5511.6185 5420.6185 93848 004018691 5110.6151 93908 004018652 1400.6230 94053 004018651 1550.6151 93955 E3809705 1551.6180 94191 081004 1400.6160 LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER 8/11/2004 10:14:15 Page - 32 Business Unit PSTF OCCUPANCY CITY HALL GENERAL GENERAL STORM SEWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL STREET LIGHTING REGULAR PONDS & LAKES RICHARDS GOLF COURSE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS POOL OPERATION YORK FIRE STATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GOLF DOME PROGRAM AQUATIC WEEDS SENIOR CITIZENS 50TH ST OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY TRAFFIC SIGNALS DISTRIBUTION BUILDING MAINTENANCE TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR BUILDING MAINTENANCE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS CLUB HOUSE EQUIPMENT RENTAL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT RENTAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CONTRACTED REPAIRS DATA PROCESSING CITY HALL GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 Check 0 Date Amount Vendor / Explanation 1,405,739.79 .Grand Total CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/12/2004 —8/12/2004 PO S Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 1,405,739.79 Total Payments 1,405,739.79 Business Unit 8/11/2004 10:14:15 Page - 33 R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/11/2004 10:20:04 Council Check Summary Page - 1 8/12/2004 - 8/12/2004 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 282,618.82 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 4,011.42 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 809,817.69 05100 ART CENTER FUND 6,303.66 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 7,016.04 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 8,219.94 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 18,663.62 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 35,589.48 05600 EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND 16,391.27 05800 LIQUOR FUND 183,099.34 05900 UTILITY FUND 28,926.82 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 916.04 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 4,165.65 Report Totals 1,405,739.79 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policies and City Manager o Le \,v g ��s���2,, v �y AGENDA ITEM: VIII.A. LAURA PLAETZER - LENGTH OF PARKING IN RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD No packet data ❑ Oral presentation Information coming City of Edina. August 11, 2004 Carolyne Bisson 5340 Hollywood Rd Edina, MN 55436 Dear Carolyne: Welcome back. I hope you had a nice vacation. I just thought a quick note to clarify the process for applying for a Pet Permit would be in order. Since a Pet Permit Application is a variance consideration to City Code 300, City Code requires the following steps: • A public hearing, which is held at a City Council meeting. • Notification regarding the hearing to neighbors within 200 feet of your property. • That notification must be mailed at least 10 days before the hearing. As a result of these requirements, the soonest the City Council could consider your application would be at the September 7, 2004, Council meeting. That is, providing your application and fee are submitted to the Health Department by Thursday, August 26, 2004, in order for the hearing notice to be sent. If you have questions you may call me at 952- 826 -0463. Sincerely, 1;. Solvei M. Wilmot Edina Health Department mac: Mayor Maetzold and Edina City Council Members City Hall (952) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (952) 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (952) 826 -0379 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD TUESDAY, JULY 13, 2004, AT 7:00 P.M. EDINA CITY HALL MAYOR'S CONFERENCE ROOM 4801 WEST 50'" STREET MEMBERS PRESENT: Peggy Jennings, Vice Chair. Bob Kojetin, Herman Ratelle, Ann Swenson, Marie Thorpe and Don Wray MEMBERS ABSENT: Gary Nyberg and Bill Crawford STAFF PRESENT: Joyce Repya, Associate Planner OTHERS PRESENT: - Robert Vogel, Preservation Planning Consultant - Lisa Miller, 4600 Sunnyside Road - Dan Kreiter, Matthias K. Builders - James Cradit, Architect for - Anne Whitman, 4620 Drexel Avenue - Joni Bennett, 4003 Lynn Avenue - Mary Carte, 4208 Branson Road I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: Member Swenson moved for approval from the June 8, 2004 meeting. Member Jennings seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. II. CERTIFICATES OF APPROPRIATENESS: COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT A. H -04 -6 4600 Sunnyside Road Remove detached garage and build a new one Planner Repya explained that the subject property is a 1931 English Cottage style home located on the north side of Sunnyside Road west of Browndale Avenue. The homeowner is proposing to tear down an existing, simple frame, detached 2 -car garage. Although the house is a pure English Cottage style, which could qualify for landmark status on its own merit, the garage appears to be more contemporary than the house, contributing slightly to the historic character of the property, but is not architecturally significant in its own right. The proposed new garage is a 3 -car detached structure measuring roughly 24' X 33 ", or 770 square feet in area. A building height of 23 feet to the highest peak and 15.5 feet to the midpoint of the gable is demonstrated on the plan. Furthermore, a 9/12 -roof pitch is proposed. Regarding placement of the structure, the new garage is shown to be approximately 20 feet further back on the lot than the existing garage, but still approximately 30 feet from the rear lot line. A setback of 3 feet is provided from the side lot line, which is within the code requirements. Adjacent elevations of neighboring structures were not provided with the application because the homeowner indicated that there are no structures adjacent to the proposed garage. An air photo of the property was provided to illustrate the subject property relative to the abutting properties. Ms. Repya pointed out that the Country Club District Plan of Treatment recognizes garages as a form of new construction requiring a Certificate of Appropriateness, but has no specific guidelines for the design of detached garages. According to the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the treatment of historic properties, new construction is an appropriate undertaking in an historic district when it is compatible in size, scale, materials, color and texture with other buildings in the neighborhood. Robert Vogel, the Board's Heritage Preservation Consultant inspected the property from the street and indicated that the plans submitted for the new detached garage show a much larger and ornate, eclectic, Tudor - influenced structure; although it lacks historical precedents in size, scale, mass proportions and materials, the new design should not have an adverse effect on other historic homes in the district, including the adjacent properties. Based on the drawings submitted with the application, information provided by the applicant and the comments from Robert Vogel, Planner Repya concluded that the proposed garage should not detract from the historic character of the property and adjacent historic homes. Approval was recommended for the request to demolish the existing detached garage and replace it with a new detached garage, subject to the plans presented. Member Swenson asked why all three applications for Certificates of Appropriateness were accepted without the required elevation drawing of adjacent structures. Planner Repya explained that all of requests for consideration were submitted on the deadline date, while she was on vacation. Normally, the applications would be considered incomplete. until all the required information was provided. Mrs. Swenson stated that she was inclined to table the items until the next meeting awaiting the elevations of adjacent structures, but would not. She did ask Ms. Repya to convey to members of the Planning staff that until all the required information is provided, an application will not be accepted. Regarding the subject request, Member Swenson asked if it was appropriate for the front facade of the garage to be stucco and stone, like the dwelling and the remaining three sides lap siding? Consultant Vogel explained that lap siding is I not inconsistent in the district, and is identified as one of the recommended applications in the plan of treatment. There are no hard and fast rules dictating that all four elevations of a structure consist of the same materials. Board members observed that it is not uncommon for the front facade of a structure to be more ornate than those elevations not visible from the front street. Member Jennings observed that the height of the garage is proposed to be 23 feet and asked how that compared to the height of the existing garage. Lisa Miller, the homeowner stated that she did not know the height of the existing garage. Robert Vogel pointed out that the existing garage is a simple single story structure that probably measures around 15 feet high. Mrs. Jennings opined that the proposed 3 -car garage will be about 8 feet taller and considerably larger than the existing garage, and wondered how the new structure would affect the adjacent properties. Consultant Vogel stated that the garages built in the 1930's do not compare to what is being built today. The trend is toward more of a "carriage house" with room for storage and at least two vehicles; that wasn't the case years ago. He added that while the proposed garage is larger and somewhat taller than what it is replacing, it is comparable to other requests for detached garages that have come before the Board. Member Swenson opined that she can appreciate the need for the size of the garage, however she questioned the design of the rear elevation; pointing out that she felt that the 33- foot wall of lap siding will be quite an imposition on the neighboring property and in need of some detail to break it up. Vice Chair Kojetin asked the property owner if she had any comments. Lisa Miller, 4600 Sunnyside Road explained that the existing garage is in terrible shape and they are attempting not only provide a better looking, more useful structure, but also, by moving it back on their property, lessen the impact of the structure on the neighboring properties. She added that in designing the garage, they have attempted to be consistent with their home as well as the neighborhood. Member Swenson stated she had no argument with the garage plan, pointing out that the front elevation is very attractive. She then asked Mrs. Miller if she would consider adding some detailing to the rear elevation to break -up the long flat surface. Mrs. Miller said she would be happy to work with the Board and asked for clarification of the requested added detailing. Mrs. Swenson explained that she did not want to require any specific design, however suggested the Miller's might work with their architect to pull in some elements from the front facade on to the rear elevation. Member Wray then moved to approve the Certificate of Appropriateness to remove an existing detached garage and construct a new detached garage 3 subject to the plans presented and the condition that a revised rear elevation providing added detailing be submitted for approval by city staff. Member Kojetin seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. B. H -04 -7 4526 Drexel Avenue Remove attached garage and build a new detached garage Planner Repya explained that the subject property is located on the northwest corner of Drexel Avenue and Bridge Street. The home, a 1935 English Cottage style with Norman Influence, has an attached garage that appears to be an addition to the original house. The proposed plan involves the conversion of the existing attached garage to living space and the construction of a new 2 -car garage in the rear yard. The changes to the home involve taking the existing 458 square foot attached garage and converting that to 377 square feet of living space; reducing the footprint of the home by 91 square feet. The proposed detached garage is shown to be set back four feet from the side and rear lot lines. The curb cut for the driveway will be moved west on the lot to accommodate the location of the new garage. The design of the proposed garage includes a lay -on dormer above the garage doors, 10/12 -roof pitch, slate shingles and stucco to match the house, as well as limestone veneer on the lower portion of the south elevation. The height of the structure is shown to be approximately 15 feet to the peak of the roof. Although no elevation drawings were provided for adjacent properties, the photographs provided with the application along with the proposed plans depict a project that is compatible with the size, scale, mass and proportions of the nearby historic buildings. Staff finds that with the exception of the elevation of adjacent structures, the application complies with the requirements of the Country Club District Plan of Treatment, thus would recommend approval of the request for a Certificate of Appropriateness to build a detached garage in the rear yard, subject to the plans presented. Member Swenson asked if a permit was required for the new driveway curb cut. Planner Repya explained that a permit would be required from the Engineering Department. She added that the permit should not be a problem because it is actually advantageous to move the driveway further west from the Drexel /Bridge Street intersection. Mr. Dan Kreiter, the builder representing the homeowner apologized to the Board for neglecting to include the elevation of adjacent properties with his submittal package. He pointed out all adjacent structures are at least 30 feet away from 4 the proposed garage, with the exception of a freestanding lawn gazebo in the rear yard of the property to the north, which is 20 feet away. Addressing the plan, Mr. Kreiter explained that it was important to the homeowner to pay close attention to the details of the plan to ensure that the overall aesthetic integrity of their home and the neighborhood were maintained. He added that the conversion of the attached garage to living space and the construction of the detached garage will enhance the property not only from the perspective of the subject home but from the neighborhood as well. Board members discussed the proposal, agreeing that the changes to the property would be an enhancement. Member Swenson then moved for approval of the request for a Certificate of Appropriateness to build a new detached garage. Member Jennings seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. H -04 -8 4620 Drexel Avenue Remove a detached garage and incorporate a new attached garage with an addition to the home Planner Repya explained that the subject property is located on the west side of Drexel Avenue, six lots north of Country Club Road. The home is a 1925 English Cottage style structure with a 2 -car detached located in the rear yard. The garage sits roughly 19 feet from the rear lot line, 9 feet from the side lot line, and is accessed by a driveway running along the north property line. The subject garage to be removed lacks individual architectural distinction, and is not historically significant in its own right. A Certificate of Appropriateness is not required for the addition to the home, which includes the new attached garage, however because the project involves a major alteration of the existing home, it is relevant to see what is necessitating the demolition of the garage. Ms. Repya pointed out that in her absence, Consultant Vogel reviewed the proposed plan and determined that the attached garage is shown to be visually compatible with the proposed exterior remodeling, which is an embellished high - style Tudor Revival treatment. Mr. Vogel indicated that although not subject to a Certificate of Appropriateness, the addition and fagade detailing would be compatible with the size, scale, mass, proportions, color and materials of other Tudor - influenced homes in the district. Furthermore, the design does not destroy any significant historic architectural material and will not adversely affect the neighboring historic properties. Planner Repya found that, with the exception of not receiving exterior elevations of adjacent structures, the remainder of the materials submitted with the application package comply with the Country Club District Plan of Treatment; 5 and the proposed plans meet the zoning ordinance regulations regarding lot coverage and setbacks, thus staff recommends approval of the request for a Certificate of Appropriateness to demolish the detached garage on the subject property and incorporate an attached garage with an addition to the home, subject to the plans presented. Member Swenson inquired about the setbacks of the new attached garage relative to the building height. Mr. James Cradit, architect for the homeowner explained that he has reviewed the proposed plan with Kris Aaker of the Planning Staff and feels sure that the setbacks fall within the Zoning Ordinance requirements. Board members discussed the plan, commenting that the attention to detail and the proposed hip- roof reduce the massing of the structure and enhance the design. Mr. Cradit and the homeowner, Anne Whitman were complimented for creating a plan that will add to the historic integrity of the subject property as well as the neighborhood. Member Ratelle then moved approval of the request for a Certificate Appropriateness subject to the plans presented. Member Swenson seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. D. H -04 -9 Highway 100 Sound Wall from Minnehaha Creek north to W. 44th Street Planner Repya explained that a sound wall is proposed for the east and west sides of Highway 100. The wall proposed for the east side is subject to Heritage Preservation Board review and the issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness because it will abut the westerly boundary of the Edina Heritage Landmark designated Country Club District. The subject wall will extend from Minnehaha Creek north to the north side of West 44th Street. The wall over the bridges for Minnehaha Creek and W. 44th Street is proposed to be 10 feet high. The portion of the wall abutting the neighborhood is proposed to be 20 feet high. The City Council approved this project at their June 1, 2004 meeting. Board members received the project information from the Engineering Department as well as a copy of the June 1St City Council minutes. In addition to the Certificate of Appropriateness requested from the Heritage Preservation Board, the project is also being presented to the Minnesota State Historical Society for their review. In a memorandum to the Heritage Preservation Board, City Engineer, Wayne Houle explained that although the wall will have a visual impact on the historic neighborhood, the benefits of providing a barrier from the noise and air pollution of the highway will actually enhance the historic integrity of the district. A Consultant Vogel, providing his reflections on the proposed sound wall, explained that the Secretary of the Interior's standards for historic preservation projects and the Country Club District Plan of Treatment are the required basis for Certificate of Appropriateness decisions. While neither document provides specific guidance with respect to the visual impacts of large public works construction projects, the general standard is to avoid destruction of the distinguishing original qualities of a historic property or its environment. Mr. Vogel explained that in his opinion, the proposed sound wall is an appropriate undertaking in the Country Club District. The wall will be a large structure and it will be visible from the historic homes in the district, but no significant historic properties will be destroyed or damaged by the construction. The wall will also serve as a buffer against air and noise pollution from the highway, which adversely affect the historic character of homes in the district. Mr. Vogel advised the Board that in approving the Certificate of Appropriateness, they should bear in mind that highway sounds walls are engineered primarily to fit with the environment and architectural elements of the highway system, therefore noise wall aesthetics tend to emphasize a consistent visual appearance from the perspective of the motorists. He opined that it would be possible to mitigate the visual effects of the sound wall on nearby historic homes by using vegetation to soften and screen the surfaces visible from within the historic district. He added that the Board might wish to make the Certificate of Appropriateness conditional upon the development of a sound wall aesthetics plan for the district. Mr. Vogel also provided the Board with a handout entitled "Noise Walls" that provided some suggested aesthetic design recommendations. Board members discussed the impact the proposed wall might have from the neighborhood perspective. Concern was expressed that the wall may be quite imposing and look very different in realty than on a piece of paper. The question was raised whether the City had any control over the design of the wall. Mr. Vogel explained that the walls are limited to specifications from the State Highway Department from which there is virtually no deviation. Member Thorpe observed that she knows several property owners directly affected by the proposed wall, and they have worked for years to mitigate the impact of the highway on their properties. Member Jennings agreed with Mrs. Thorpe, pointing out that she knows some affected people who haven't used their back yards for years. Member Ratelle observed that he did not feel comfortable acting on the request until Member Crawford, a retired State Highway Department Engineer weighed in on the discussion. 7 Member Swenson stated that she would like to receive more information about the impact of the wall from the neighborhood perspective; pointing out that the project information focused on the wall from the highway perspective. Board members agreed with Mrs. Swenson. Member Ratelle then moved to table the request for a Certificate of Appropriateness to construct a sound wall along Highway 100 abutting the westerly boundary of the historic Country Club District until the next meeting of the Board on August 10, 2004, at which time, Member Crawford can provide his expertise and questions regarding the impact on the neighborhood can be answered. Member Swenson seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. Members then brainstormed over the questions they would like addressed at the August meeting, and came up with the following list: 1. HPB would like to see an elevation of the sound wall from the neighborhood perspective, indicating scale and proportion relative to the houses. They would also like to see a creek side of the wall over the bridge. 2. Is there precedence for a sound wall over the creek? If so, what does the wall look like from the creek side? 3. Did the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District have input on the project? 4. Is it possible to enhance the design of the wall on the neighborhood side? 5. Is there a process to ensure that some type of vegetation is included on the neighborhood side? III. MORINGSIDE SURVEY: Planner Repya advised the Board that of the 720 properties in the Morningside neighborhood, subtracting the duplicate owners and City parcels, 681 surveys were mailed to the property owners identified by Hennepin County's Assessing records. Taking into account surveys returned to the City as undeliverable, 675 surveys were delivered. Although the deadline for return of the surveys was June 18th, staff continued to tabulate results until July 8th when 290 surveys had been returned for a return rate of 43 %. Ms. Repya observed that the return rate was very good, however, not unexpected. Edina is notorious for receiving excellent input from the residents, be it for a survey, or during an election. Several years ago, when the Heritage Preservation Board surveyed the Country Club neighborhood, the response rate was 58 %, again and excellent turnout. E-13 Referring to the survey results (attached to these minutes), Planner Repya found it interesting that the favorable response rate for the historic preservation of the neighborhood and City involvement with the process is almost identical with the responses received in the Country Club survey. She added that due to the considerable concern expressed by neighborhoods throughout the city regarding the tear down of homes and new construction, one might see a similar response if the survey were conducted citywide. Ms. Repya pointed out that many respondents included comments with their surveys, which were very interesting. The majority requested that the eclectic, small town charm of the neighborhood be preserved. Many commented that the 44th / France commercial area should not change; some wanted a 50 & France feeling and others wanted to see an Excelsior & Grand (St. Louis Park) development with multi - family housing interspersed with commercial. Ms. Repya concluded that no action was required regarding the survey; asking the Board to take the results into consideration when the topic of historic designations is discussed at the next meeting on August 10th. Vice Chairman, Kojetin asked the two members of the Morningside Neighborhood Association, Joni Kelly and Mary Carte if they had anything they would like to say. Mary Carte explained that a group from Morningside, including the Morningside Neighborhood Association, attended the July 6th City Council meeting to express their concerns about the 44th and France Redevelopment Plan. In preparation for that meeting, a group from the neighborhood association came to City Hall and tabulated the survey results for themselves. As part of their tabulations, Mrs. Carte explained that they categorized the comments relative to the 44th and France commercial area and determined that 6% of those commenting suggested changes to the area, the majority wanting it to remain the same. Mrs. Carte completed her recitation of the group's results and then provided Planner Repya with a copy to add to the file. Mr. Kojetin asked Mrs. Kelly and Mrs. Carte if they thought the survey was valuable. Mrs. Kelly stated that most people value the historic character of the neighborhood and are concerned with preserving that. She added that the people she has spoken with were grateful to have the opportunity to express themselves, and added that the process is new for many who still have quite a few questions about the implications and processes. Sharing his insights about the survey, Consultant Vogel stated that the results interestingly mirrored those of the Country Club District survey, and those mirrored the Gallup polls. None of these neighborhoods are that different from other neighborhoods in the United States. Three - fourths of people who live in older neighborhoods think they shouldn't change. Studies find that the areas most opposed to historic zoning are the commercial districts. e Mr. Vogel pointed out that the remarkable thing about the Morningside Survey and what makes it different from other surveys he has studied are the vast number of comments received from the respondents. This survey could be looked at as a miniature public hearing. It can be a useful tool when creating a work plan to address concerns of the constituents. Board members agreed that they look forward to the work session at the August meeting when Mr. Vogel will present his study on the ramifications and implications of historic zoning, particularly as it applies to the Morningside neighborhood. No formal action was taken. IV. OTHER BUSINESS: None V. NEXT MEETING DATE: August 10, 2004 VI. ADJOURNMENT: 8:40 p.m. Respectfully submitted, yce epya, Associate nner 10 MORNINGSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD SURVEY RESULTS AS OF: July 30, 2004 675 SURVEYS DELIVERED / 297 RETURNED 44% How long have you lived in Momingside? 56 0 -5 yrs., 19% 55 6 -10 yrs., 19% 70 11 -20 yrs., 2( 4 %) 35 21 — 30 yrs. 12.% 34 31 — 40 yrs. 12% 38 41+ yrs. 13% 2. Are you aware of the history of Morningside dating back to 1905? YES 78% , NO 20% 3. Do you think the City should be involved with preserving the historic integrity of the Morningside neighborhood? YES (80%), NO 2( 0 %) 4. Would you be in favor of the Morningside neighborhood being designated a landmark district? YES (70%), NO 30 %) 5. Would you be in favor of a neighborhood stewardship program emphasizing a non - regulatory approach to include education, information sharing and voluntary compliance? YES (21!/o), NO ( 27 %) Both 4 or 5: YES 53% , NO 11% 6. How do the following affect the quality of life in Morningside? + = positive effect, - = negative effect, 0 = no effect *Tear down of old homes to build new: + 35 %, - 53 %, 012% *New Construction: + 29 %, - 42 %, 0 29% *Traffic flow: + 24 %, - 48 %, 0 27% *Park Improvements: + 93 %, - 0 7% *Street Maintenance: + 92%,- 1%, 07% 7. What kind of change, if any do you want to see made in the 44`h /Sunnyside and France commercial area? NONE 61% Suggestions 4( 3 %) Suggestions: See Attached MORNINGSIDE SURVEY RESPONDENT'S COMMENTS #7. 44th 1h & FRANCE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT: What kind of change, if any, do you want to see made in the 44`h & France Commercial area? None? 181 of 297 responses (61 %) SUGGESTIONS: From most prevalent 36 Commercial needs to enhance area: 8 Restaurants 6 Upscale retail/better selection 6 Improved landscaping & artwork 3 Book/coffee shop 3 Drug store 2 Upscale grocery store 2 Hardware store 2 Ice Cream/candy store 2 Shops 1 Improved lighting 1 Holiday lights 30 Durr Property — 4386 France Avenue suggestions: 16 Just lease the empty space (no suggestions) 8 Restaurant 4 Upscale dining with wine 2 Community Center 22 Continued improvement to buildings in keeping with the architectural integrity of the area 22 Comments relative to 44`h & France Redevelopment Plan (1990): 5 No government involvement in redevelopment of area 5 No loss of homes for redevelopment of commercial area 4 Neighborhood should be a part of the planning process 4 Allow market to dictate change 2 Property owners involved should be a part of decision - making process 2 Disagree with 44`h & France Redevelopment Plan 21 Maintain and encourage quaint, neighborhood, small town businesses 16 No multi - family housing (apartments or condominiums) 1 15 Less traffic /traffic calming measures 14 No chain stores — restrict large commercial buildings 12 No more....: 6 Retail, antique or boutique shops 2 Reconstruction 2 Restaurants, fast food 1 Newspaper stands 11 Create an area like: 5 Linden Hills 4 Excelsior & Grand 2 501h & France 9 Keep original buildings when possible to protect historic architecture 8 Continue being pedestrian friendly with sidewalks 7 Become more pedestrian friendly 7 Need more off - street parking 7 Redevelop dry cleaner and old theater for commercial use 4 Improve small town character of area 4 Tear down, remodel or improve yoga/photo building 3 Eliminate on- street parking 2 Create a more grand and historic character to area 2 Consistency and guidelines for quality exterior signage needed The following suggestions were from one (1) respondent: - Eliminate the alley between Convention Grill and Cameleon - Don't create another 50`h & France Commercial area - Provide better sidewalk maintenance - Add a sidewalk to the south side of Sunnyside Road - Reduce airplane noise 2 f • I General Comments: from most prevalent 25 Preserve integrity of all properties in keeping with the diversity of the area 17 No more huge houses overshadowing neighbors (McMansions) 16 Oppose regulations forcing compliance with Morningside wide design Standards 14 Favor regulations for home maintenance and remodeling 6 More landscaping of boulevard areas (trees & gardens) 6 Historic markers with information about area 5 Need more information 4 Complete sidewalk system 4 Keep commercial area separate from neighborhood 4 Promote programs to encourage community collaboration and socialization 3 Subsidized, public and affordable housing 4 New homes and remodels should match old town look of area 2 O.K. to tear down houses not identified as historic 2 Receive treatment equal to Country Club District 2 No on- street parking 2 Enforce water drain -off ordinances 1 Don't want to see what's happening in the CCD happen in Morningside 1 Work in partnership with St. Louis Park for sidewalks to Browndale Park 1 Stop allowing remodels, teardowns and new construction 1 No gated community 1 Replace historic sewer system 1 Keep garbage and recycling out of sight 3 Traffic concerns: 6 Keep traffic as is — no changes to accommodate the Country Club District 4 Need sidewalks on W. 42nd Street 3 Less street parking The following were single suggestions: - Consider affect on Morningside when proposing changes - Longer light at Sunnyside & W. 44th streets - Install traffic light at 42 "d & France - No exit at Hwy 100 and W. 44th St. - W. 44th St. needs resurfacing - Sidewalks /curbs and gutters need repair throughout Morningside - No one -way or closed streets - Make W. 42 "d St. 1 -way westbound and add weight limits - Install a sidewalk system south to Southview Middle School - Add speed bumps on W. 42 "d St. to slow traffic - Close France Ave. to trucks - Reduce speeds on Sunnyside Rd. ADDITIONAL SURVEY DATA: 720 Properties in the original Village of Morningside that were included in the survey 681 Surveys mailed (less 39 for duplicate ownership and City properties) 675 Surveys delivered (6 were returned as undeliverable) 297 Surveys returned 223 Respondents who included comments 74 Respondents who did not include comments 4 s EDINA PARK BOARD S 7:00 P.M. SOUTH METRO TRAINING FACILITY JUNE 8, 2004 MEMBERS PRESENT: Mike Damman, George Klus, Linda Presthus, Karla Sitek, Jeff Sorem, Alice Hulbert, Andy Finsness, Jeff Johnson, Allyson Grande, Mike Weiss MEMBERS ABSENT: Floyd Grabiel STAFF PRESENT: John Keprios, Ed MacHolda, Janet Canton, Vince Cockriel, Kevin Kelleher, Mike Nibbe OTHERS PRESENT: Kathy Iverson, Brittany Meyer, Ellen Jones, Shirley Hunt Alexander, Gene Persha, Bill Haymaker, Kathy Zuspan, Idelle Longman, Diane Plunkett Latham, Dan Latham, John Miller, Mackenzie Miller, Abbi Butterfield, Pete Dehnel, Conor Marrinan, Patti Marrinan, Tim Marcantonio, Kenny Friede, Kristi Butterfield, Tom Horner, Libby Horner, Sharon Ming, Jon Barnett The Park Board went on a tour of the South Metro Training Facility. Mr. Keprios thanked Kevin Kelleher, Operations Coordinator, for the wonderful tour. I. APPROVAL OF THE TUESDAY, MAY 11, 2004 PARK BOARD MINUTES Linda Presthus MOVED TO APPROVE THE MAY 11, 2004 PARK BOARD MINUTES. Jeff Johnson SECONDED THE MOTION. MINUTES APPROVED. II. DUCKWEED REMOVAL ON HIGHLANDS PARK POND — JON BARNETT Jon Barnett, resident, indicated that he and his wife moved to 5633 Interlachen Circle last fall. He pointed out that his next -door neighbor also wanted to be here tonight but was unable to attend. Mr. Barnett passed around a photo to the Park Board that was taken last fall of the duckweed on Highlands Park Pond. He indicated that duckweed was not a problem until the last few years. He pointed out that in 2003 the green floating vegetation that is shown in the picture was there from approximately mid -June until the first frost. Mr. Barnett commented that the neighbors have informed him that occasionally there was a very strong odor coming from the lake to which he personally has not yet experienced. He stated that the duckweed is just now starting to form this year. He noted that no one will swim in the lake in this condition and only a few will Is canoe on it. Mr. Barnett pointed out that this lake is owned by the City of Edina whereas there are some lakes within Edina that are owned by the property owners. He indicated that the city owns the land that sits around the lake as well. Therefore, the City has a 30- foot easement from the lake to their yard as well as owning the lake. Mr. Barnett . 0 explained that when they called the City of Edina to spray for it Mr. Cockriel came out and talked to their neighborhood group and told them a little bit about it. He noted that Mr. Cockriel informed them that there is a chemical called copper sulfate, which has been approved by the EPA and explained that basically it kills the duckweed and returns the water to its natural state. Mr. Barnett informed the Park Board that they are not asking the city to pay for this because eight of the homeowners have agreed to foot the bill. It is his understanding that the cost would be approximately $1,000 per year and according to Mr. Cockriel it would need to be sprayed twice a year. Mr. Barnett stated that the homeowners are just trying to improve the aesthetics of the lake as well as get rid of the odor. He noted that the lake is not very deep and he believes that it does freeze from top to bottom every year so there shouldn't be a problem with fish or that type of thing. Mr. Keprios pointed out that Vince Cockriel, Edina's Park Superintendent, is basically in charge of the treatment of all of the lakes and ponds throughout the community. He noted that he is here tonight to answer any questions that the Park Board may have. Mr. Barnett indicated that the north end of the lake was sprayed in 1998 after the resident living at 5617 Interlachen Circle complained of swimmer's itch. He noted that Dick Pelinka, Utilities Superintendent at the time, did receive a permit and did spray the area. Mr. Barnett stated that Mr. Cockriel would tell you that the city does not spray city owned lakes. Therefore, the reason he is here tonight is because it's city policy that they do not spray the lakes and the homeowners of Highlands Park Pond would like to have an exception made for them. Again, he stressed that the city would not be paying for this because the homeowners have agreed to foot the bill. He noted that hopefully they would be able to solve this problem. Ms. Hulbert commented that the staff report states that the main reason behind the neighborhood's request is aesthetics and asked if the neighborhood would agree to that. Mr. Barnett replied that number one because of the way it looks who would want to go in it and secondly some of the neighbors have complained of an odor. Mr. Finsness asked how many homes are on the lake to which Mr. Barnett replied that there are five homes that back up to the north end of the lake. However, all along Mirror Lakes Drive where there are homes that sit above the lake and really do not have much of a view. Mr. Barnett pointed out that eight neighbors have agreed to pull together and pay to have the north end of the lake sprayed. Mr. Finsness explained that he would like to know if the other neighbors are in agreement to this. Mr. Barnett replied that he thinks so, however, they didn't really get into it too much because it seems like such a non - issue. He noted that he couldn't imagine someone not wanting to have this done. Mr. Johnson asked about a permit to which Mr. Cockriel explained that the City would have to go to the DNR and apply for a permit to allow them to spray. He noted that he has serious doubts that the DNR will even let them do this. Mr. Keprios indicated that in the letter he received from the Area Fisheries Department of the DNR it seems as though it 4 LI they encourage the residents to use a mechanical method rather than a chemical method if they really want to get rid of the duckweed. Ms. Presthus asked how reliable it would be to mechanically remove this to which Mr. Cockriel replied that it would be very labor intensive. Mr. Cockriel explained that one big concern he has with doing this is that it will set a precedent. He noted that he is also concerned with what the effects will have on the wildlife and vegetation of the pond. Mr. Cockriel stated that with that in mind he doesn't think the DNR will go for it. He explained that the way the process works is the City would request a permit and then someone from the DNR would come out and take a look at it and see what other management practices are currently being exercised. Mr. Barnett indicated that he would at least like to see the City apply for a permit and let the DNR come out and see what they think the solution may be and then take it to the next step. Mr. Cockriel explained that when you get into a permitting process there are a lot of different opinions and issues that people will have. He commented that even if someone has what they would perceive to be a valuable amenity with the front of the house cleaned up doesn't mean everyone is going to get on board with this. Ms. Presthus asked Mr. Cockriel how much of a problem is the odor because to her that is something much different than the aesthetics. Mr. Cockriel replied that he's not going to doubt that there was an odor last year; however, it definitely did not come from the duckweed because duckweed has no smell. He explained that more than likely the odor was caused, by rotting snails and dead fish because the basin was so low. Mr. Cockriel noted that. they treat approximately 37 bodies of water in the city to which most of them are privately owned lakes. He explained that the reason they are involved at all is because when there is a development they actually direct the water onto private property because that's where the lake is so with that concept they agree to help keep the water flowing and somewhat clean so that it doesn't become an issue. He pointed out that they are all controlling lots of outlets. Therefore, the city gets involved in order to keep it structurally sound so that they do not have any flooding issues. Ms. Hulbert asked is there any public access to that lake such as a public boat dock or swimming beach to which Mr. Cockriel replied that boating and swimming is not encouraged on any of the lakes within the City of Edina with the exception of paddleboats at Centennial Lakes. However, that's not to say that a homeowner doesn't have a canoe. Mr. Barnett stated that ultimately it's the DNR's call that's going to make the decision, however, they can't get to the DNR without the city's approval. Mr. Finsness asked if it came down to it would the city want the residents to pay for it. Mr. Cockriel replied that he doesn't think the Park Board would have the authority to do it because there is not park money spent on the lakes. He noted that the money for these types of projects comes out of the Public Works Department. 3 Mr. Johnson indicated that he read that duckweed is a food source and asked if they would be taking out a major food source for fish and wild life. Mr. Cockriel explained that duckweed for waterfowl and large birds supports insects that the fish eat as well as they provide shade, which slows the growth for the bird plant. He also explained that the duckweed, algae and water meal shade the water so that the bottom growth gets stunted. Mr. Johnson asked if by eliminating one problem would we be creating another problem? Mr. Cockriel replied that there's no doubt that by eliminating the top vegetation other types of weeds will take off. Ms. Hulbert asked if this is a new problem or has it always been this way. Mr. Cockriel responded that the reason he isn't backing this proposal is because he doesn't think it's a long -term condition of what the lake will look like in August. He explained that there has always been some duckweed and some floating vegetation on these ponds because all of this water is coming from Nine Mile Creek and is moving on through Edina. Mr. Cockriel stated that even if we killed every piece of water meal and duckweed, if we had a heavy rain we would get something from somewhere else into that body of water. Mr. Keprios commented that they've also learned that duckweed is a very aggressive plant and has very limited success for chemical application. It is not discriminating and essentially kills all of the aquatic weed. Ms. Presthus wanted to make sure she understood what has been said is that last two years have been abnormal because it has been so dry. Therefore, this year because of all of the rain and water flow it might not look at all like that this year. Mr. Barnett replied that if you went to his house right now you would see it's as bad as it was last year it's just in a smaller area and added that he thinks it's going to be just like it was last year. Mr. Barnett asked if dredging the lake could possibly eliminate it to which Mr. Cockriel replied that it very well could. Mr. Cockriel noted that the lake hasn't been dredged in a long time, however, that's out of the Park Department's jurisdiction and would be an engineering issue. He stated that would sure be a step in the right direction as far as eliminating or slowing the growth of the floating vegetation. Mr. Cockriel stated that he is concerned about setting some sort of policy because he does get asked to spray other areas. He noted that a lot of the lakes /ponds look like that late in the year. Mr. Johnson indicated that he would like to get the DNR's opinion on this and see what they have to say. Mr. Finsness asked so the motion is to apply for a permit is there a second Mike Weiss SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. III. TOBACCO -FREE PRESENTAION — KATHY IVERSON, EDINA CHEMICAL HEALTH COORDINATOR Kathy Iverson, Edina Chemical Health Coordinator, indicated that she is the Chair of Edina Chemical Health Partners and also a member of CAFE (Clean Air for Edina). She it 4 noted that a number of organizations have members here tonight which include: League S of Women Voters, Adopt -a -Park Program, Edina Chemical Health Partners, HEROS, and Edina Community Health Committee. She stated they are here tonight to request the Park Board's consideration for an expansion of the policy that has already been established regarding tobacco use in Edina Parks to include a 24/7 ban on tobacco use on all park property. Ms. Iverson commented that they really appreciate all of the policies that have already been established for a tobacco free environment at places such as the in door park facilities. She noted that in addition they also appreciate the Park Board urging all of their youth athletic associations to establish a drug, alcohol and tobacco policy that reflects a zero tolerance approach to illicit drugs, tobacco and alcohol use by youth participants. Ms. Iverson quoted the following from the Edina Park Board Statement of Philosophy and Recommendations Regarding Drugs, Alcohol and Tobacco "It is the belief of the Edina Park Board that the role modeling of parents, guardians, teachers and coaches have a significant influence on youth attitudes towards the use of alcohol, tobacco and other drugs. It is the Park Board's policy and philosophy to encourage parents and coaches to do their best to always display, positive and healthy role modeling behaviors while interacting with youth ". Ms. Iverson pointed out that a voluntary tobacco -free recommendation during youth athletic activities offers limited protection for our community because there are a lot of other youth and family activities /events that go on in our parks. She indicated that the Park and Recreation Department has developed a comprehensive plan to guide Edina's parks administration and policies. She noted that in this plan there is reference to trends affecting recreation programming to which some of the trends are significant to the discussion tonight including physical fitness, wellness, nutrition, obesity, diabetes and drug/ alcohol abuse. She commented that these trends are all health related concerns. Ms. Iverson pointed out that the parks are one of the few places in our community where all generations can interact together. Ms. Iverson stated a tobacco free park policy 24 hours a day seven days a week is not only cost effective, it is cost saving. She explained that in a discussion with staff they learned that several hundred pieces of tobacco trash are picked up weekly at Centennial Lakes Park to which they are not the only site where there is a tobacco trash problem. Ms. Iverson indicated that the City of Edina has tobacco free ordinances for all city and park buildings. The Edina school system has a tobacco free policy for all school property indoor and outdoor. The Southdale YMCA has a tobacco free policy, which extends to all of its outdoor facilities including the new skateboard park to which the Edina Park Board was strongly involved in its development. Ms. Iverson pointed out that the neighboring cities of Richfield, Bloomington and Eden Prairie have ordinances limiting and eliminating the use of tobacco in their parks. She commented that a consistent policy throughout our community would translate into better serving our children, protecting our Is health and serve to lower health care costs in the future. Ms. Iverson stated that there is inconsistent policy regarding tobacco in our park system. She noted that contradictory 5 messages are being sent to children depending on whether they are playing an indoor activity where it is tobacco free or playing an outdoor activity where there is no tobacco policy. Dr. Peter Dehnel, Edina resident, indicated that he is a pediatrician as well as the Director of the Children's Physician Network and is also very involved with Hennepin Medical Societies in Minneapolis. He stated that he is coming to the Park Board tonight to ask for help. He explained that in Minnesota 39% of 18 -24 year olds are current tobacco users, which is a high percentage for this country and in 2001 Minnesota ranked the second highest in the nation. He noted that 80% of the 18 -24 year old smokers started smoking before they were legally able to use tobacco. Dr. Dehnel explained that a tobacco free parks ordinance would send a subtle but very powerful message starting from early childhood that tobacco use is not the norm. He stated that when a young toddler is watching a sibling play soccer and is exposed to the site of an adult using a tobacco product it sets a precedent early in life. He noted this is something that the Park Board would have the opportunity to intervene in. He stated that this is really important because there are very few opportunities for tobacco prevention left. Dr. Dehnel informed the Park Board that the legislature has gutted the tobacco prevention fund and therefore there isn't any money available for tobacco prevention. Dr. Dehnel informed the Park Board that 80% of adults in general are not tobacco users so if you support tobacco use in the parks you are going with the minority. He indicated that there are many other communities that do have park and public place ordinances -for tobacco use and tobacco free zones and this could be another opportunity for Edina to loin them. He noted that he is sorry to say that Edina is not on the leading edge of this but they should certainly not be on the trailing edge of it either. Brittany Meyer informed the Park Board that she is the Program Director of "Tobacco Free Youth Recreation" which is a statewide program that works with community Park Boards and City Councils. She noted that she would be happy to answer any questions anyone may have about adopting tobacco free policies or ordinances for their community park systems. She explained that they have been working with this initiative now for over three years and currently there are 50 cities around Minnesota that have either adopted a policy or an ordinance which prohibits tobacco use in some or all of their park property or park facilities. Ms. Meyer went over the reason why some of these cities have been adopting these policies. She noted that they look at the health, safety and welfare of the community. They also look at having a consistent policy among all recreational facilities in the community. She pointed out that the school facilities are your other primary recreational facilities that already have a tobacco policy as well as the YMCA. Ms. Meyer noted that many of the youth sports organizations already have tobacco free policies and because of this communities have adopted these policies because they are urged to do so by the youth sports organizations. She explained that sometimes the organizations have tobacco free policies but the facilities they use don't. Therefore, it makes it very difficult for them to try and enforce that policy especially with the lack of signage and lack of it C9i community wide awareness about the policy. Ms. Meyer stated that cigarette butts make S a huge mess and take away from the beauty of the parks. Ms. Meyer informed the Park Board that their program is happy to provide these signs to communities who adopt a tobacco free policy or ordinance free of charge. She noted that the majority of the cities who have adopted a tobacco free policy /ordinance are using these signs right now by posting them around their parks. She indicated that generally communities rely on posting signage and hopefully do a nice comprehensive publicity plan. She noted that groups like the "Clean Air for Edina" would work with park staff to come up with some promotional publicity ideas, which basically lets the community know what's going on. Ms. Meyer explained that with all of the communities that have adopted these policies /ordinances none of them have police officers patrolling the parks and ticketing people who are in violation of this because that's not the point. The point is to look at promoting a positive, healthy community. Connor Marrinan, Edina resident, indicated that he is in the Adopt -A -Park program with his brother and have adopted a park on Chowen Avenue for several years now. He noted that when they have park clean up they always see a bunch of cigarette butts around. He indicated that they have talked about putting up their signs because it really sends a bad message to the kids when they see a bunch of cigarette butts on the playground area and around the park. He commented that he would like to see the parks be tobacco -free. Ms. Hulbert thanked Mr. Marrinan for his dedication and asked that he wear gloves when picking; up the cigarette butts because they are a biohazard. Abbi Butterfield and Mackenzie Miller, students from South View Middle School and Valley View Middle School, indicated that they are part of a group called HERO (Health Educators Reaching Out). Ms. Iverson noted that basically both middle schools got together and formed HERO which help try to make our community more aware of how they can really help people lead healthier lives. Ms. Butterfield asked the Park Board to imagine they are at their child's athletic event in the summer and everywhere around them are cigarette butts and the person next to you is smoking and people are coughing. Ms. Butterfield pointed out that secondhand smoke is a very dangerous aspect of smoking. She stated that the carcinogens, which are the cancer causing agents in smoking, are actually higher in secondhand smoke than what the actual smoker is inhaling. Ms. Butterfield stressed that by eliminating smoking in the parks they can minimize the amount of secondhand smoke as well as it will stop all the cigarette butts that are on the ground. In addition, people bring their pets to the park and if a pet ate a cigarette butt and got sick it would be tragic for that person. Ms. Butterfield pointed out that they have to face the truth that smoking is a danger to everyone, the smoker, the animals and basically the whole community. She stated that by eliminating smoking in the parks they won't completely stop smoking but it will help put a dent in the problem. She noted that kids will stop seeing smokers and think it's cool and will realize it's just stupid. it Ms. Iverson indicated that the Executive Director of the Southdale YMCA could not be here tonight. She handed out a copy of the YMCA's policy which basically states: The 7 YMCA has designated its offices, facilities, grounds and vehicles smoke free because of its goal to improve the physical, mental, and spiritual well being of persons and its dedication to providing a healthy and comfortable environment for its team members, program participants and volunteers. Tim Marcantonio, Edina High School Soccer Team Captain, indicated that he would like to talk about some of his personal experiences. He noted that he likes to go down to Garden Park for a run and sometimes there will be an adult there with their_child playing at the park as well as he will see someone there smoking a cigarette. He stated that it isn't healthy for the child or the person walking the dog or the runner. Mr. Marcantonio commented that it's actually harder to run when there is smoke around because it is harder to breathe and that's not healthy. Diane Plunkett Latham, member of the League of Women Voters, indicated that the League of Women Voters in Edina has a policy to reduce the substance abuse (alcohol, drugs and tobacco) among the youth. She noted that she has found evidence of youth smoking in shacks they have built in the big buckthorn thickets. Ms. Plunkett Latham stated that if they can ban smoking in the parks it would set a better example and by cleaning up the buckthorn thickets it will make the parks much less friendly for substance abusers. She commented that she urges the Park Board to support the program of banning smoking in the parks. Tom Horner, Edina resident, indicated that he has coached boys traveling baseball in Edina for the last 13 to 14 years and is now coaching girls fast pitch softball. He indicated that in his professional life he does a lot of work around public policy including health care and tobacco control. Mr. Horner stated that Dr. Dehnel pointed out that there has been an increase in the number of smokers less than 18 years of age in Minnesota. Mr. Horner noted that before the tobacco litigation was settled, Minnesota funded a target market. He noted that after 1998 with the target market smoking started to decline among people less than 18 years of age. Therefore, now with the elimination of funding and tobacco controlled programs the tobacco smoke use among under 18 year olds is going to skyrocket again. Mr. Horner again referred to Dr. Dehnel's statement about how smoking has increased in 18 to 24 year -olds and that 39% of the people in that age group are smokers. He pointed out that is two times the rate of the older adults. Mr. Horner explained that one of the interesting things that came out in the litigation with the tobacco industry is how much they, manipulated public opinion, particular those under the age of 18.. He stated that there are reams of documents in which the tobacco executives talk about the need to find replacement smokers among the under 18 year olds years because their customers are dying off. Mr. Horner indicated that one of the most effective tools that the tobacco industry has found in capturing the under 18 year old market is the role modeling with sports, celebrities and their adult counterparts. He noted that parents and older adults are'definitely role models and when kids see those adults smoking, that sets the norm and it becomes the accepted practice. He also noted that when they see it in a sports environment it becomes the accepted practice as part of a health environment. Mr. Horner informed the Park Board that the CDC has now said that even minimal exposure to secondhand smoke has significant implications for all kinds of health problems. He At 0 noted that study after study has shown that second hand smoke, even in an open space, S can be devastating for one's health. Mr. Horner stated that his response to the Park Board is why wouldn't you do this, with 80% of Minnesotans being non - smokers, why wouldn't you protect the health of the kids and the majority of people. Mr. Horner noted that the Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids estimates that 80,000 Minnesotans who today are under the age of 18 will die as adults of premature deaths as a result of tobacco related diseases. He stated that to put it another way 80,000 kids are going to die premature deaths as adults for decisions they are making as kids modeled after what they see from their parents and other adults. Ms. Iverson shared a perspective from a recent article in the Journal of American Medical Association that was dated March 10, 2004. It states that medical treatments are extremely costly and that 15% of the US gross domestic product is devoted to health care and added that tobacco related health costs are significant. The current trends and actual causes of preventable death from 1990 to 2000 reflect tobacco as one of the top three causes of preventable death and the other two are diet/activity and alcohol. She noted that because a substantial portion of these early deaths among the US population could be prevented through lifestyle change the social commitment to making those changes possible must be enhanced considerably. Ms. Iverson stated that decisions about whether to smoke or not is the result of strong cultural and commercial signals. She stated that our leadership and commitment at the policy level is important for progress. She stressed that what we do as adults is much more impressive than what we say. Ms. Iverson Is indicated that by having a 24/7 policy recommendation it gives us a chance to show the kids that we care about them, we mean it when we say tobacco use is harmful to your health. A tobacco ban on all park property is a potent way for our community to express and reflect the values of the majority of Edina citizens. This issue is too serious and too important to be considered as a voluntary recommendation or policy. After all, wisdom is knowing what to do next but virtue is doing it. Kathy Zuspan, Edina Resident, indicated that she is a mom but she is also an anesthesiologist who does obstetric anesthesia so her concern is with the unborn baby and she knows what problems smoking can cause. She stated that she was surprised to hear that Edina's parks were not smoke free and when she asked a lot of people about it they were also surprised to hear that the parks were not smoke -free. Ms. Zuzpan stated that this really is an important issue because most people think this has already been dealt with. She pointed out that in Edina there are rules for things that are a lot less dangerous to people such as skating on the sidewalk, camping in the park, changing oil in the park, etc. These are a lot less dangerous to people than smoking and exposing other people to smoke. She noted that this is a serious issue and all of the people in the audience tonight demonstrate that. Ms. Zuzpan indicated that she heard someone say what's wrong with a dad who wants to walk clear across the field and smoke or what about the guy who wants to walk his dog and have a cigar. She expressed that what's wrong with that is that person is walking on the footpaths which we are all relegated to and when that person is fi long gone the rest of us our walking through his cloud of smoke. Ms. Zuzpan pointed out that studies have shown that even minute amounts of smoke are toxic and carcinogenic. ►'1 She stated why can't Edina be more on the front end of this instead on back end, Edina is a fabulous place to live so lets keep it that way. 0 Bill Haymaker, Edina resident, indicated that he grew up in Edina and his kids play sports in the Edina programs as well as he has coached baseball. He noted that he is not here to defend smoking per se and doesn't view himself as a bad role model. Mr. Haymaker stated that he thinks having tobacco free parks is a bad thing. He noted that everyone knows that the top two leading causes of death are heart disease and smoking and as we all know the leading cause of heart disease is diet. Therefore, if smoking is a bad example then is not diet a bad issue also. He stated if that's the case then maybe there should be signs to the entrances of the park saying no fat people allowed. Mr. Haymaker stated that smokers also help pay for all of this infrastructure in the parks. He also pointed that he feels it's very disingenuous to talk about that we are going to have clean air if there aren't smokers in the park; however, when people start their cars those same issues are there. Mr. Haymaker stated that he is not here to defend smoking, however, he is here to defend a world of tolerance because he is not convinced that second hand smoke is a problem. Mr. Keprios stated that before the Park Board discussion starts he would like to say two things. First, Diane Plunkett Latham is also the president of Garden Council, so whenever you see these gorgeous beds of flowers in your park system we can thank her and the Edina Garden Council for all their help. He noted that the Garden Council deserves big thanks for the.fabulousjob they do: Secondly, he noted that he really appreciates the youth of our community being here tonight to speak before this group. He stated that the youth here tonight are to be commended -for having the courage to speak before a crowd like this. Mr. Keprios indicated that as far as city ordinance goes currently there is no smoking in any of the City owned buildings. There is also no smoking allowed in any of the city owned vehicles. However, there currently are no city ordinances that restrict tobacco use outdoors. Mr. Keprios explained that the Park Board has asked him to go back and see if the athletic associations would have an interest in supporting a tobacco free policy. He noted that he also informed the associations that the City would be happy to put up tobacco free signs at their athletic events. He noted that he would suggest that the associations' policies be under a voluntary compliance scenario. Mr. Keprios noted that he has received a wide support from the athletic associations on this. He stated that he thinks the group that is present tonight would like to see the issue taken a step further. Ms. Hulbert commented that she takes the Park and Recreation Department's Mission Statement very seriously, which is to determine what the needs and desires of the public will be. She noted that during the last couple of weeks she has talked to a lot of people about this. She indicated that when she talked to the booster club at the school they said they were not interested in any kind of tobacco free policy that made them do the enforcement. She noted that she also talked to a parent of a baseball player who was particularly incensed that her son's coach smoked cigars on the field but because he is it 10 such a mean guy none of the parents wanted to approach him. She stated that she thinks S it puts people in a very awkward position to try to self - enforce. Ms. Presthus indicated that she is definitely in favor of no smoking at games in front of children, however, having the parks be tobacco free 24 hours a day seven days a week is a whole different story. She noted that smoking is not illegal and pointed out that they have parks that are around office buildings such as Centennial Lakes and if there is no smoking allowed those businesses may want to move out of the Centennial Lakes offices. She noted that they also have to think about the golf courses as well and realize that not all parks have playground equipment and games played at them. She commented that she sees a lot of problems with having a 24/7- policy /ordinance. Ms. Grande stated that she agrees that smoking is not a productive thing for anyone. However, it is legal for people to smoke who are over 18 years of age and she doesn't feel it's their place to tell someone they can't smoke outside. Ms. Grande noted that kids are going to still keep smoking at the parks whether a sign is there or not. It really doesn't matter because it's illegal for them to smoke in the first place. Mike Nibbe, Edina Police Officer, indicated that police cannot enforce a tobacco free policy in the parks; however they can take action if it becomes an ordinance. Mr. Finsness commented that creating a city ordinance is a City Council procedure. He noted that if they were to just put up a sign it's basically still a voluntary compliance. Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that their charge is to recommendations on policies and laws for the City Council's consideration. Mr. Johnson indicated that he goes to youth events with his daughter and son and he just doesn't see a lot of parents smoking on the sidelines. He noted that he thinks parents are pretty conscious about not smoking in front of the kids. He stated that if he did see someone smoking at a youth athletic event he might ask them to wait until people leave. However, he does have a tough time telling someone who wants to walk their dog at 9:00 at night and have a cigarette that they can't. Mr. Johnson commented that he would not have a problem with putting up signs because it may prevent some people from doing it. However, like Mr. Grabiel stated in his letter, if you start putting up new enforceable laws maybe other laws become less enforceable which may open up a scary can of worms. Ms. Sitek stated that she has a problem with having a 24/7 smoke -free policy because she also doesn't feel it's their place to tell people they can't walk their dog at 9:00 at night and have a cigarette. Ms. Sitek noted that she has kids who play a lot of sports and she just doesn't see people smoking around the kids. She indicated that she doesn't think this is something that can be enforced. She stated that 24/7 is a pretty hard line for something that isn't illegal. Mr. Damman indicated that he pretty much agrees with what Ms. Presthus had to say in itthat Centennial Lakes and the golf courses are a totally different thing than the parks with the fields and playground equipment. He noted that Centennial Lakes has restaurants and there's an issue with that. He stated that Edina has some facilities in their park system that a lot of other cities don't have and we need to take that into .consideration. Mr. Damman commented that he would approve of having tobacco free parks where the kids are having games. He noted that he would hate to see signs go up everywhere but if that's what it would take then that's what they would need to do. Ms. Hulbert indicated that she is an anesthesiologist and commented that why anyone would want to smoke is totally beyond her. She noted that she doesn't understand some of the questions that are being raised such as since smoking is legal they should be able to do it.. Ms. Hulbert commented that there are a lot of things that are legal, however, you can't do them in the parks. She noted that they are not saying people can't smoke, they are saying people can't smoke in the parks. She noted that she thinks the parks are resources where a kid can go to work out; it's like their own health club. She stated that she doesn't think anyone belongs to a health club where their treadmill partner is smoking a cigarette. However, it seems to be okay to have a cigarette at the playground with the children present because there isn't a policy. At the moment, Edina parks are smoker friendly. Ms. Hulbert commented that she thinks the parks should be tobacco free because the purpose of parks is a place where people can go and find a clean, healthy, natural environment. Ms. Hulbert informed the Park Board that she was at Centennial Lakes last Sunday for about four hours and in that time she saw one smoker. However, when she walked over there during the lunch hour there were 20 to 30 smokers there because of the office buildings. She asked is Centennial Lakes Park, which is the most beautiful park in the city and state, there for smokers to come and use during the week? She asked why couldn't they go out in front of the buildings to smoke because there's no reason they need to smoke in the park. Ms. Hulbert pointed out that the amount of cigarette litter that is at Centennial Lakes is incredible and the plantings are just full of cigarette butts. She noted that she thinks that's very inappropriate for our park system to be used in that way by people. She stated that it's the nature of smoking that you're going to produce: litter. Ms. Hulbert indicated that she has spoken to the police chiefs of Eden Prairie and Bloomington because both cities have ordinances. She noted that they have had no calls on this and that it has been very positive and they would highly recommend a smoke -free policy. Ms. Hulbert stated that one of the major problems she has with smoking in the parks is that teenagers tend to congregate in the parks to smoke because they have no place else to do it. She noted that unless they call the police to have their ages checked you couldn't tell them to stop smoking. However, if there was a no smoking in the park ordinance anyone could tell them to stop smoking in the parks because it doesn't matter how old they are. Ms. Hulbert commented that Edina has a lot of gorgeous boulevards for people to walk and smoke on so she doesn't understand the whole concept of wanting to go to the park and smoke. She noted that the parks are supposed to be their little preserve of cleanliness 12 in nature and beauty and she doesn't know why smoking needs to go with that. In addition, the streets are not set up for children's recreation like the parks are. Mrs. Hulbert pointed out that the incidence of exercise induced asthma is going up every year and if a child who has asthma is engaged in a sport and someone is smoking that is totally inappropriate. Mr. Sorem indicated that some parks are obviously a cause for more concern than others and asked if it would be possible to allow smoking at some parks but not others. He noted that Braemar Golf Course would be an issue because people like to occasionally smoke a cigarette or cigar on the golf course. He stated that there are not a lot of kids around the golf course so they really wouldn't be setting a bad example. Also, it would be pretty tough for the Braemar rangers to enforce it. He also noted that if someone can't walk their dog and smoke in the park they will do it on the sidewalk and there are kids playing in the driveways there so the bad example has been set. Mr. Weiss stated that to the best of his knowledge the Edina Liquor Stores and the golf courses sell cigars to which the Park Board is funded in whole by proceeds from those parks and liquor store. Therefore, that may be an issue that should be addressed probably prior to the conversation that is going on right now because maybe the city should not be involved in this. Mr. Weiss pointed out that he doesn't condone smoking and he doesn't recommend smoking, however, he doesn't think they can legislate smoking. He commented that his kids know that smoking is bad and noted that in his 8 years of being S involved with three sports he has never seen a parent smoking at an athletic event. Mr. Weiss again stated that he has a hard time legislating behavior. Mr. Finsness commented that personally he's a big proponent of indoor air quality as well as a big supporter of getting it out of the bars and restaurants. ' However, he agrees with Mr. Weiss in that he doesn't want to legislate it outdoors. Mr. Klus informed the Park Board that he is an old hospital and nursing home CEO and he knows the effects of smoking. He also explained that he has been contacted by the Star Tribune three times in the last month to talk to him about the recent articles that were in the paper on smoking. However, they did not quote him once in those articles with the reason being they considered him a smoker because he likes to smoke 3 cigars a year. Mr. Klus stated that he is a guy who once in awhile likes to smoke a cigar and walk in the park. He also noted that for the last 8 years he has coached his son in baseball and football and he can think of only one parent that smokes and that person leaves to walk down to the end zone to smoke and then comes back to join the rest of the parents. Mr. Klus stated that he has a hard time himself legislating smoking outside. He noted that if he saw a coach smoking in the dugout he would ask them to please stop because that is wrong, however, in his baseball experience he has never seen that. Mr. Klus asked the Park Board if before he got to the meeting, had they heard any specific complaints from the audience on smoking in the parks or was it more of the health issues, which are 13 rightly so issues. Are we having concerns in some of our parks other than Centennial Lakes to which it was noted there were not. Mr. Klus commented that he has a hard time recommending policy or ordinance for laws that cannot be enforced. He noted that there already is a law that enforces juvenile smoking and we need our police department to enforce that because he is not in favor of seeing juveniles smoke. George Klus MOVED TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL THAT WE HAVE A POLICY THAT THERE BE NO SMOKING DURING ATHLETIC EVENTS. Linda Presthus SECONDED THE MOTION. Mr. Sorem asked Mr. Klus what he means by "event" to which Mr. Klus replied that to him an event would be a game, it would not include practice. Mr. Johnson indicated that his big concern is the people who are smoking outside the front doors at Braemar Arena. Mr. Klus replied that he would rather see that addressed in a different motion because he feels that is a separate issue. Ms. Presthus asked Mr. Klus if this would be voluntary because unless there is an ordinance there's no way that it can be enforceable and asked if he is recommending a policy or an ordinance to which he replied he would recommend an ordinance. Ms. Presthus commented that they need to think these things out further, they can't just say yes we will have an ordinance and there will be a fine. She noted that they have enough trouble enforcing things that are really a problem. Ms. Presthus pointed out that she thinks obesity is a bigger problem and therefore do they want to start legislating that people can't have candy wrappers in the park because obesity is a problem and therefore you shouldn't be eating a candy bar in front of a kid. She asked how many laws are going to be put on the books and how are they going to enforce it. Mr. Klus commented enforcement is a tough issue and doesn't think they really can enforce any non - smoking ordinance. Ms. Sitek replied that it should then be a policy and not an ordinance. Mr. Klus indicated that the reason he is suggesting an ordinance is because what he is hearing the community say is we need to put some teeth to this and he doesn't disagree with if they keep it in a box that they control. He noted that the box that they can control is athletic events. Ms. Sitek stated that if it's not going to be enforced she doesn't want it to be a law. Ms. Hulbert replied that the police couldn't enforce anything unless they are standing there at the time. Mr. Keprios asked Ms. Presthus if she seconded that motion knowing full well that it was for an ordinance and not a policy. Ms. Presthus replied that she seconded the motion only for the sake to be able to have a discussion. In Favor: Jeff Johnson, Alice Hulbert, George Klus Opposed: Allyson Grande, Mike Weiss, Linda Presthus, Mike Damman, Karla Sitek, Jeff Sorem, Andy Finsness It 14 0 MOTION DEFEATED George Klus MOVED TO RECOMMEND THE SAME MOTION ONLY INSTEAD OF IT BEING AN ORDINANCE HAVE IT BE A POLICY ADOPTED BY THE CITY. Jeff Johnson SECONDED THE MOTION. Mr. Klus clarified that it would not be the entire park; it's only for the athletic field event that's going on. He's not looking to make the whole park smoke -free, only that area that is for the athletic game. He noted that he doesn't feel we can legislate the whole park. Mr. Sorem asked how far away would someone have to be from the athletic event before they could smoke. Mr. Finsness commented that all they can do is put up a sign that's pretty blatant asking people not to smoke at these events. Mr. Klus commented that he thinks they should look to the city for the recommendation on what they think is the athletic field and the spectator area. Ms. Presthus asked so basically what they are doing is just offering a voluntary sign that is going to say during athletic events we request that you refrain from smoking. George Klus CALLED THE QUESTION. Andy Finsness SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Johnson indicated that he would like to see a designated smoking area outside of .Braemar_ Arena away from the front doors. He noted that maybe they could put up signs and some big can trash ashtrays. Mr. Klus asked if there is currently a sign there to ..which Mr. Keprios replied no because it is not a policy. Jeff Johnson MOVED TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL THAT THERE BE A POLICY TO HAVE A DESIGINATED SMOKING AREA AWAY FROM THE FRONT ENTRANCE AT BRAEMAR ARENA. Jeff Sorem SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Alice Hulbert MOVED TO RECOMMEND TO CITY COUNCIL THAT ALL PLAYGROUNDS ARE NON - SMOKING 24/7. Andy Finsness SECONDED THE MOTION. Ms. Hulbert clarified that by playground she means the sandlot that the pre - school children play on. There is no smoking inside the sandlot. Mr. Finsness asked Ms. Hulbert to make it a concise motion. Alice Hulbert MOVED THAT THERE WILL BE TOBACCO FREE ZONES it ESTABLISHED AT ALL EDINA PLAYGROUNDS OF THE PLAY AREA, PLAY LOT. Jeff Johnson SECONDED THE MOTION. 15 IN FAVOR: Alice Hulbert, Jeff Johnson, Allyson Grande, Mike Damman 0 OPPOSED: Karla Sitek, Linda Presthus, Mike Weiss, Andy Finsness, George Klus, Jeff Sorem MOTION FAILED. Alice Hulbert MOVED THAT DURING PUBLIC EVENTS AT THE AMPHITHEATRE AT CENTENNIAL LAKES WILL BE NON - SMOKING. Andy Finsness SECONDED THE MOTION. Mr. Klus asked Mr. Keprios if his staff have ever had issues with people smoking at the amphitheatre. Mr. Keprios replied that they have not had any significant problems other than some debris issues. IN FAVOR: Alice Hulbert, Andy Finsness AGAINST: George Klus, Michael Damman, Jeff Johnson, Linda Presthus, Karla Sitek, Jeff Sorem, Mike Weiss, Allyson Grande MOTION FAILED The Park Board thanked the audience for coming and for all of their input. IV. FACILITIES RECOMMENDATIONS (GYMNASIUMS AND DOME) — STAFF Mr. Klus informed the Park Board that he and Mr. Keprios do not agree 100% on the gymnasium and dome issues that are being presented tonight. Mr. Klus indicated that Mr. Keprios' recommendation states that there is really not much more that the City of Edina can do for gymnasiums to which he would agree. He noted the reason being that the gymnasiums really belong next to schools: He stated that he hopes that the school district will be open to discussing the concept of placing a gymnasium in place of the but at the Community Center. However, it's not the city's position to go to the school and ask them to do something on school property. Mr. Keprios commented that it's okay for the Park Board to make recommendations to the School Board but it's not appropriate for staff to do that. Mr. Klus indicated that Mr. Keprios recommends that a dome should be placed at Braemar because he is concerned about the cost of a permanent structure. Also, he is concerned about the ability of the athletic associations to raise the needed funds. Ms. Hulbert asked if anyone has considered partnering with another city to do this. Mr. Johnson replied that he thinks most cities are already doing something on their own. He noted that his big concern is there are so many going up right now that not everyone has to rely on using Holy Angels. Mr. Klus indicated that Mr. MacHolda made a good point it IV that all of the domes that are going up are being done through the schools with the exception of Plymouth. Mr. MacHolda indicated that Mr. Keprios and he didn't spend a lot of time on the gymnasiums. However, they do agree in terms of trying to utilize general parkland and agreed that Pamela, Rosland and Braemar would not be a wise utilization of those spaces. Mr. MacHolda stated that as far as a dome goes he is in disagreement with Mr. Keprios in that he is not in favor of putting up a dome at Braemar because they would need to put in a fire lane, which would reduce the size of the playing surface. In addition, it would greatly change the look of the park. Mr. MacHolda pointed out that he would not recommend this, however, they are here to serve the community and if that's what they want they will do it. Mr. MacHolda explained that when they started the field in 1985 it was too narrow for most sports. It worked for football but for most others it was too narrow. Therefore, they removed some trees and created a large retaining wall on the southeast corner so that it became more user friendly for other activities. Mr. MacHolda pointed out that by putting up a bubble like this they are going back to what they once had for space. Mr. Keprios indicated that the Soccer Club stated at our. last Park Board meeting that they would be willing to compromise the width of that field so they could have a practice facility. He noted that is what it would become, a practice field that's affordable. He commented that realistically it is affordable if the Soccer Club can come up with the kind of money they are proposing. Mr. Keprios stated that he thinks that under that scenario I they could get the job done without a referendum. However, Mr. MacHolda pointed out to him that he's not so sure that the individual who spoke on behalf of the Soccer Club is speaking for the majority. It's his understanding that the majority of soccer probably doesn't feel that way and that taking this approach would not be in their best interest. Mr. Keprios commented that ultimately the athletic associations are primarily the ones they would be building it for. Since there are so many domes going up outside of Edina they will have to assume they will not be receiving any revenue from non - residents. Mr. Klus indicated that maybe they should look at possibly partnering with a corporation because over the years there have been people who have wanted to help. Ms. Hulbert commented that looking at this from a coaches point of view if you build a facility that is not regulation size they may say it's okay for practice but in reality it will not be okay. Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board if they are going to ask the user groups to seriously come forward with a large amount of money they are going to want to know if it's something that they really want to do. They need to decide if this is the facility they want and are willing to put up the money for. Mr. Keprios stated that staff has looked at all of the parks and they feel very strongly that this is their only option because nothing else will work within any other park. Mr. Klus indicated that the Park Board needs to decide whether a dome is going to meet enough needs and that it will be worthwhile for us to pursue it. Mr. Johnson asked if 17 nothin&is done within the next couple of years are they going to lose their potential donor? a Mr. Johnson commented that he thinks they should wait and see what the neighboring communities are doing because they may not have enough tenants to fill them and may end up begging us to come over and use theirs. Therefore, they may want to wait and see if it fits our needs and then we don't have to build one. He noted that yes; we may run into some costs. However, we won't need to spend 3 million dollars to build one. Mr. Sorem indicated that he agrees with Mr. Johnson. He also noted that he would hate to lose the field at Braemar because it is an excellent field. Mr. Weiss commented that he thinks that they've identified that the. schools have the most available land. Therefore, maybe the city should wait a couple of years and see what the demand is and if that demand is still there then go back to the athletic associations and say you've got to put pressure on the schools because that's the only place that makes sense. Mr. Johnson stated that they are going to need to get commitments from the associations and find out how much they would use it as well as what times they would use it. We need to get an idea of how much we would be able to fill it within our own community. Mr. Klus made a point that operating costs could be as much as $30,000 a month. He noted'that Soccer Club spends an average of $30,000 to $40,000 a year on rentals. Therefore, that would take care of one month's operating expenses. Ms. Hulbert asked does anyone know how much these communities charge per hour for their domes to :which Mr. MacHolda replied that he believes it's around $300.00 an hour. Mr.-MacHolda indicated that he thinks Mr. Johnson raises a very good point in that this next winter season there are two more bubbles going up in nearby communities, which will be a lot easier to get to than Holy Angels. He also pointed out that the majority of people who use these bubbles use them for training space and/or camp opportunities. Mr. Johnson again stated that he thinks there is going to be too much saturation in domes. He noted that he could be wrong but lets wait a year and find out. Mr. Johnson stated that if it were up to him he would have it put at Kuhlman. Mr. Klus commented that personally he thinks there is a need, however, how much of a need he doesn't know. In addition, he agrees with Mr. Keprios in that there are going to be some issues but as it was mention earlier "if we build it, they will come" which he agrees with. However, will they use it enough to raise over $300,000 in revenue a year to make it work, he doesn't know. Mr. Klus stated that if they are going to put it to bed than lets put it to bed tonight and if we need to bring it back in a year to discuss then they will. Mr. Klus noted that he is willing to go out and talk to the associations and inform them that this is going to go away because we don't feel the support is there for it. He stated that if any of the Park Board members think differently than you are going to have to step up to the table because he doesn't feel strong enough to move on it. Mr. Finsness mentioned that at the last Park Board meeting they had a good turnout from the athletic associations as well as he thinks that has been the strongest support they have heard so far. Ms. Hulbert noted that she would like to say something for the record as far as m turnout and support and that is there are a lot more people here tonight on the smoking issue then they've ever had regarding the dome. She wants to make sure it doesn't go on the record saying that the biggest turn out Park Board has had was regarding the dome because that it not the case. Mr. Klus stated that he believes if the associations keep growing the way they have been they are not going to be able to meet all of their needs because we won't have the fields. He noted the he thinks they are going to reach the level where they are going to have to go to other communities to practice because we physically don't have the property. Ms. Hulbert asked if the associations are going to be able to use the artificial turf fields that they are putting in at the high school. Mr. MacHolda replied that the question has been asked but to his knowledge it has not yet been answered. He noted that it is their hope that the school will allow us to participate on those fields when they are not in use by the school. He commented that he feels the city and the school have a great relationship and they share facilities all the time. Mr. Klus indicated that he thinks the same thing will happen with the dome issue that happened with the smoking issue in that Park Board had to make a recommendation on policy /ordinance because the associations weren't going to do it. He noted that we asked them and they didn't respond. Mr. Klus stated that he thinks in the end the associations are not going to come back to us. He noted that it's up to the Park Board to make the best recommendation they can to the City Council. Ms. Sitek replied that they've made their recommendation to the City Council and there's nothing else they can do. Mr. Klus replied that they need to reflect that in the minutes if that's what they believe. He explained that he thinks we need to reflect something that tells these associations what are stance is right now and if we come back and look at it in a year, fine. Mr. Finsness noted that personally he would love to see a permanent structure at Braemar just for the fact that they would have an indoor facility to use all year long. He commented that he doesn't know where the money would come from and knows that's probably being irresponsible. Ms. Hulbert stated that she thinks this needs to be a rational business decision and not an emotional decision. She also noted that she thinks that to make a business decision you need to wait six months and see what's happening with these other domes. Ms. Hulbert commented that those domes in the other communities are still going to be there no matter what we decide to do in Edina and pointed out that's going to have a huge impact on whether it's going to be profitable to open another one. Mr. Finsness replied that's only if they are trying to sell it to other communities. Ms. Hulbert again stated that she feels if you build a non - regulation size field they will go to other facilities where there is regulation size field. Mr. Finsness asked would this be regulation size to which Mr. MacHolda replied that it would only be a regulation size field for football and for the younger soccer players. Mr. Weiss commented that if they build a permanent structure than there doesn't need to be a road put in and you pick up the extra 10 ft. Mr. Weiss stated that he's with W. Finsness if you are going to do it you have to build a permanent structure. Mr. Johnson indicated that his question is who's going to foot the bill when this thing losses money every year Z to which Mr. Klus replied the city. Mr. Weiss asked if all of the city's facilities make money to which it was noted no. a Mr. Klus commented that they were put together to meet a need that the community had, not based upon making money but providing services to the community that the community wanted at that time. Ms. Presthus replied then we do it, we tell them that's what we want to do; however we can't financially afford it. She noted that we say we want to build a permanent facility at Braemar and ask the city how are we going to finance it and what are we going to do because the need is there. Ms. Presthus pointed out that it's not up to the Park Board to figure out exactly how it's going to be financed. Mr. Keprios replied that he doesn't totally agree with that because it is an enormous issue and it is important for the Park Board to decide on a recommendation for funding. Mr. Keprios stated that essentially the proposal he is asking the Park Board to recommend is to ask the user groups to fund half of the construction costs and an additional % million dollars in the bank to cover whatever operational losses /shortfalls they may have from lack of revenue. Mr. Klus commented that what he is hearing is that some folks on the Park Board would rather see a permanent structure that's regulation size that can be used by more groups for more activities. Therefore, they would have to raise three million dollars or more. Mr. Keprios explained that there are other options of financing. He noted that one would be a general obligation bond referendum. He pointed out that if the associations can raise $3 million, then the City Council might be willing to fund the remaining costs without having to go to the voters. He noted that there is a special law that allows the City Council to issue general obligation bonds backed by liquor store profits without having to go to the voters for approval. Mr. Keprios stated that he thinks the City Council may be willing to:go with that if you are able to get the associations to pay for half of the construction costs and a % million dollars in the bank to cover operational expenses. Mr. Keprios asked the Park Board do they want a bubble or a permanent building to which Ms. Hulbert replied that she thinks that if they are going to go all the way they should build a permanent building. Ms. Hulbert stressed that they will need to have significant input from the associations, otherwise they will walk away. Alice Hulbert MOVED TO RECOMMEND TO START WORK ON STARTING A PERMANENT STRUCTURE WITH HALF OF THE FINANCING TO BE ORGANIZED BY THE ASSOCIATIONS AND HALF BY THE CITY WITH A HALF A MILLION DOLLARS FOR OPERATIONAL EXPENSES. Linda Presthus SECONDED THE MOTION. Mr. Finsness asked does that include the possible money that's out there from some guy to which Ms. Hulbert replied that if they can find someone who wants to give money that's fine. Mr. Keprios indicated that he thinks what this does is it lets the user groups know that they need to come up with that kind of money which will than determine if this indeed is what they want. Ms. Hulbert stated that they need to make a significant financial 8 o] commitment to be a partner. Mr. Klus pointed out that he thinks it's up to the Park Board to talk with the user groups and not just leave it up to staff. We need to let them know this is what we did for you, now what can you do to help us. IN FAVOR: George Klus, Andy Finsness, Alice Hulbert, Jeff Johnson, Linda Presthus, Karla Sitek, Jeff Sorem, Michael Weiss, Allyson Grande ABSTAINED: Mike Damman V. PARK ASSIGNMENT PRESENTATION — JEFF JOHNSON Mr. Johnson indicated that his park assignments were Heights Park, Lewis Park and Bredesen Park. Mr. Johnson noted that he grew up at Heights Park, lives by Lewis Park and has walked around Bredesen Park. Mr. Johnson informed the Park Board that the two new fields at Lewis Park are absolutely in fantastic shape, whoever did them, did a great job. He noted that the hockey rink is paved so people can play roller hockey in the summer. He indicated that the middle field is also in very good shape. Mr. Johnson stated that there are some problems with the tennis courts and parking to which Mr. Keprios responded he is aware of those and that they are on the list to be repaired this year. He noted that the play structure is very nice although he did have a complaint from someone that there should be more infant swings because there is only one. 'Mr. Johnson commented that he doesn't know how much validity this has but a person also complained to him that the sides of the slide are not high enough and kids could fall over. Mr. Johnson indicated that the play structure at Heights Park is fairly new and he was informed by some people who were playing there that it gets used a lot. He noted that there is also a half basketball court and a bunch of kids were playing basketball before he got there and that also seems to be well used. Mr. Johnson indicated that there is also a little softball field. He also pointed out that there is a bridge going across the creek to the easement on the other side over the hill. Ms. Presthus asked about the trail to which Mr. Keprios replied that at one they did talk about that becoming part of the first tier regional trail, however it's too narrow of an area to have it used for that purpose. Mr. Johnson explained that Heights Park is a neighborhood park, which does not have a parking lot. Mr. Johnson stated that Bredesen Park has two parking lots and noted that they do have a 911 emergency phone at this park. He indicated that there are three trails at Bredesen Park. One is the nature walk trail, which is really neat spot to walk around. He added that there is also a walking path and a bike path to which both paths are just over two miles. He noted that both paths in great shape. Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that all of the asphalt at Bredesen Park was redone as part of the 1996 referendum. Mr. Johnson pointed out that there is a lot of buckthorn at the park. He commented that the Park is well used and people really seem to enjoy it. 21 Mr. Klus asked if there are any recommendations for improvements at these parks to which Mr. Johnson replied just the general upkeep of the walking path at Bredesen because. He noted that there really is no structure there other than the comfort station; however, people like it and it is well used. He commented that he doesn't think he needs to update the Park Board on the buckthorn problem. It was noted that Karla Sitek has the next park assignment. VI. OTHER A. Braemar Inspection Tour - Mr. Klus informed the Park Board that next month they would not have a meeting because of the Braemar Inspection Tour. B. Allyson Grande - Mr. Keprios asked Ms. Grande if this is her last Park Board meeting to which she replied she's not sure yet if she will be at the August meeting. The Park Board thanked Ms. Grande because she really has kicked off the student Park Board member position. Mr. Klus commented that he couldn't think of a better student to have kicked this off. He thanked Ms. Grande for her work on the Park Board the last two years and noted that she has been a great member. VII. ADJOURNMENT Linda Presthus MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETINGAT 10:05 PM. Alice Hulbert SECONDED THE MOTION. MEETING ADJOURNED. I 22 EDINA HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION. TUESDAY, JUNE 22, 2004. 6:30 PM – MAYOR'S CONFERENCE ROOM Members Present Members Absent Staff Mary Brindle Carol Carmichiel Susan Heiberg Jim Campbell Amy Frankfurt Betsy. Flaten Idelle Longman Janice Joshua Mel Ogurak Sharon Ming Andy Otness Wayne Prochniak Eileen Supple RPC. (Research, Planning & Coordination) Sharon Ming provided the background information regarding the research, planning and coordination of human services —RPC. Back in 2001, Edina's resource center and Edina's RPC were part of_a collaborative serving four south Hennepin cities — Eden Prairie, Richfield, Bloomington and Edina. After breaking away from this regional collaborative at the end of 2001, the City. and School District pledged to uphold and support the Edina Resource Center in a newly- formed local collaborative. The City then pondered the continuation of the RPC process for Edina. Historically, Edina and the other cities in the collaborative funded this initiative at approximately $22,000 per city to provide for the research, planning and coordination of human services.. The City Council subsequently charged the Human Relations Commission to create a body to continue the function.. A grassroots Ad Hoc Committee was created to define and establish an Edina RPC process and structure that would be responsive to the community. Because it was deemed beneficial for Edina to. allocate funding to a focused research, planning and coordination of human services, the City . allocated $22,000 in 2003. and again in 2004, toward this local effort.. In 2004, the Committee concluded that RPC's primary area of focus should be affordable housing._ Thereafter, Jeanne Massey. was hired to help the Committee create an RFP. for the implementation of an affordable housing initiative with a $44,000 budget, which included the amount carried over from 2003. This funding would provide a consultant to create and facilitate an affordable housing task force, while the City would provide in -kind administrative services. The consultant would be accountable to the Ad Hoc Committee of Research, Planning and Coordination.. Four consultants have been interviewed for the position. Because the initiative is expected to take up to 18 months, an additional $22,000 is being proposed for 2005. The consultant will implement public involvement, citizen input, events and communications. Expected outcomes would be the creation of an ongoing tool/group for affordable housing efforts and leadership, the securing of partners to promote affordable housing and identify sources of funding, and the development of potential housing strategies. Approval of Minutes The Commission minutes of May 25, 2004, were amended to say the following in the paragraph entitled Citywide Book - Reading Event: "Wayne Prochniak's idea of a city -wide book - reading event was shared with the School District about a year ago, and the District recently responded with a suggestion that the theme be `diversity. "' Sharon Ming seconded the motion of Eileen Supple to amend the minutes as presented; the motion carried. Proposals for Funding Each Commissioner recorded questions regarding the proposals assigned to each one of them. The answers would be fielded back to the City to be dispersed before the hearing on July 20th, when nine human services providers will share their requests for 2005 funding. Racial Diversity Mary Brindle reported that there is little racial diversity within Edina organizations, specifically Morningside Rotary. The puzzlement is how to create a diverse environment in a primarily homogenous community. Citywide Book - Reading Event Andy Otness reported that the Friends of the Edina Library were looking into an August citywide book - reading event. Wayne Prochniak suggested that this be driven by the School District, and he will connect with Laura T. Nelson. Betsy Flaten indicated that she will contact Maria Giampietro, Director of Administrative Services for Teaching and Learning for the School District, and she will find out what other communities are doing. Adjournment There being no further business, the meeting was. adjourned at 9:20 PM. Respectfully submitted, Betsy Flaten, Chair Edina Human Relations Commission BF /sh DI(iE-S- T-- July, 2004 A digest of actions taken by the Metropolitan Council, Metropolitan Airports Commission, Metropolitan Parks & Open Space Commission and Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission. Minutes of all Council and Commission meetings are filed with the Legislative Reference Library, 645 State Office Building, 6th Floor, in St. Paul for a period of up to two years and can be viewed by the public. Call the appropriate commission or operations area for meeting information and/or specific questions. Metropolitan Council The Metropolitan Council is located at Mears Park Centre, 230 E. Fifth St., St. Paul, MN, 55101. For further information regarding the contents of this publication, contact Pat Curtiss at (651) 602 -1390. The Council's general number is (651) 602- 1000, TDD: (651) 291 -0904. Recent Council publications can be found at major public libraries in the Metro Area Publications can be ordered by e-mail. The address is: data.center@metc.state.mn.us Comments can be made to that address as well as (651) 602 -1500, the Metro Council Public Comment Line. Check the internet web site at http://www.metrocounciLorg. The Council... Environment Community Development • approved the Comprehensive (Tierl l) Sewer Plan for the Cities of Maple Grove, • Allowed the City of Chaska to place the Rosemount, Shoreview, Woodbury, Blaine comprehensive plan amendment into effect and no plan modifications are required. • increased the delegated construction change order authority of its General Manager, • Adopt Payment Standards for the Federal Envirionmental Services, from $50,000 to Housing Choice Voucher Rent Assistance $58,000 for the Rosemount Plant Effluent Program, effective July 1, 2004, at a level Filters, MCES Project No. 800603. equal to the 45'b percentile Fair Market Rent for the Minneapolis /St. Paul Metropolitan • Adopt the Facility Plan for the Rosemount Statistical Area (MSA). Interceptor, MCES Project No. 920800 • award $2,677,954 in Livable Communities Management Act (LCA) Tax Base Revitalization Account (TBRA) grants to remediate contamination • amended the 2004 Operating Budget by and prepare sites for redevelopment in the adding/deleting budget authority as cities of New Brighton, Minneapolis, St. described in the following: Louis Park, St. Paul, and South St. Paul and 2 °d Quarter return the River Run Apartment Project Proposed Minneapolis application to the Community Revenues Amendment Development Committee for further Operating $ ( 9,975,356) consideration. Pass Through 0 Debt Service 0 Total Revenues $ (9,975,356) • award $62,500 in Livable Communities Act Expenditures (LCA) Tax Base Revitalization Account Operating $ (15,362,050) (TBRA) grants to the St. Paul Port Pass Through 0 Authority to remediate contamination at the Debt Service 0 Hmong Funeral Home, St. Paul. Total Expenditures $ (15,362,050) Balance / (Deficit) $ 5,386,694 _M_ DlEiEST- Transportation • concurred with,TAB Action to amend the 2004 -2006 TIP to add SP#TRF- RCRRA -04 Planning and Environmental Work for the Union Depot Multi -Modal Transit Hub. authorize. its Regional Administrator to execute a subgrant agreement for Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) funding with Anoka County for the operation of a local Transportation Management Organization (TMO), in the amount of $60,000, and for the term from July 1, 2004 to December 31, 2004. authorize its Regional Administrator to negotiate and execute a contract amendment with URS Corporation, the Hiawatha LRT Project Management Consultant (PMC) to adjust the amended contract from $19 million to an amount not to exceed $21.15 million. The Council Also: Metropolitan Metropolitan Airports Commission Metropolitan Airports Commission offices are located at 6040 28th Av. S., Minneapolis, MN 55450. For more information, call Lynn Sorensen at (612) 726 -8186. The Commission: • approved a resolution recognizing the contribution of the entire Metro Transit and Hiawatha Project Office staff. • received a Governor's proclamation recognizing the efforts of the Metro Transit and Hiawatha Project Office employees. New Publications Council publications are available from the Council's Regional Data Center. For a free and complete list of publications, write the Metropolitan Council Data Center, 230 E. Fifth St., St. Paul, MN 55101, or call (651) 602 -1140. E -mail address is: data. center @metc.state.mn. us There is a charge for some publications. The bimonthly Council Directions newsletter provides information on regional issues and Council Programs. If you wish to subscribe to Council Directions at no charge, call Dawn Hoffner at (651) 602 -1447. Commission Activities mechanical package on a graduated scale. In addition, staff was directed to.explore possibilities for a program to help homeowners finance their co- payments. approved a draft plan for the next phase of MSP's residential sound insulation program. Residents in the 65 DNL contour or greater would receive the full insulation package provided under the current program. Homes in the 60 -64 DNL, who do not already have central air conditioning, would receive a mechanical package that provides it. Those in the 60 -64 DNL wishing to participate will be required to pay for a portion of the • approved - modification of the MAC Bylaws and Rules of Procedure to create a Human Resources and Affirmative Action Committee in place of the existing Diversity Committee. Metropolitan Parks & Open Space Commission (MP &OSC) Metropolitan Parks & Open Space Commission offices are located at Mears Park Centre, 230 E. Fifth St., St. Paul, . t' 55101. For more information, call Sandi Dingle at (651) 602 -1312. The Commission: recommended that the Metropolitan Council 1. authorize a grant of $83,060 of emergency land acquisition funds from the 2002 -03 Metropolitan Regional Parks CIP to Carver County to finance 40% of the actual costs incurred to date, which totals $663,979 to finance the acquisition of 39.04 acres related to Lake Waconia Regional Park. 2. consider reimbursing Carver County $124,589 for actual costs financed with County funds in future Metropolitan Regional Parks capital improvement programs to acquire the land. 3. inform Carver County that the Council will consider other emergency land acquisition grant(s) for this land based on actual costs determined from the results of condemnation proceedings and if there are no regional park CIP funds provided to the County for acquiring land for Lake Waconia Regional Park. Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission (MSFC) Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission offices are located at 900 South 5th St., Minneapolis, MN 55415. For more information, call Nancy Matowitz at (612) 335 -3310. The Commission: • authorized the Chair and Executive Director to renew the insurance policies as presented in the Insurance Renewal Report for the 2004 -05 policy year. moved forward with the Terrace Suite Project consistent with the terms proposed by the MSFC. Absent the consent of the DiEiEST�' Vikings, the project will not move forward at this time. • approved the Year 2005 Preliminary Budget as presented and set the date for the Public Hearing on the Year 2005 Budget for Thursday, August 19, 2004 at 9:30 a.m. in the MSFC Conference Room. • authorized the Chair and Executive Director to enter into an agreement with Aramark on the Catering Kitchen Project and bring back to the Commission for approval at the next meeting. • approved the addition of one full -time position of Security Guard increasing the total full -time positions to 35. LMC 1,.V a of mn."O& Caw Cities pronwting wm &mv League of Minnesota Cities 145 University Avenue West, St Paul, MN 55103 -2044 (651) 281 -1200 - (800) 925 -1122 Fax: (651) 281 -1299 - TDD: (651) 281 -1290 www.imnc.org TO: City Clerks, Administrators and Managers FROM: Jim Miller, Executive Director DATE: August 9, 2004 SUBJECT: Board of Directors Vacancies At the Annual Meeting in Duluth on October 11th, the membership will elect four new members to the Board of Directors. These officials will replace: Minnetonka Councilmember Terry Schneider whose three -year term will expire; the two -year term of Alexandria Mayor Dan Ness, who was elected to fill the unexpired term of Reggie Edwards who left city employment; and the one -year term of Duluth Chief Administrative Officer Mark Winson, who was elected to fill the unexpired term of Bonnie Rietz when she was elected to 2nd Vice President. In accordance with the Board adopted Selection Criteria, Winson is eligible to apply for his own three -year term. St. Paul Councilmember Chris Coleman's three -year term also expires, however, Coleman did not run for re- election this past November, therefore his eligibility to serve on the LMC Board terminated January 1, 2004. Pursuant to the LMC Constitution, the LMC Board appointed St. Paul Councilmember Dan Bostrom at the recommendation of the City of St. Paul to fill Coleman's term until the Annual Meeting in October at which time he must go before the Nominating Committee and be elected by the membership to his own three -year term. The League's strength has always been rooted in the Board's outstanding leadership. Continuing that tradition is critical as the League looks to meeting the ever- changing challenges facing our cities. If you or someone on your Council has an interest in serving on the Board, please apply now. Terms are for three years and service involves attendance at monthly Board meetings and one or two, two -day, retreats. The League pays for most expenses, including mileage. A roster of current Board members, an application form and the Board Nominating Process and Selection Criteria are enclosed. I would be most happy to answer any questions and can be reached at 651- 281 -1205. Thank you for your help in this very important matter. AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER League of Minnesota Cities Board of Directors June 2003 — October 2004 PRESIDENT Mark Voxland, Mayor City of Moorhead 4535 4 St S Moorhead, MN 56560 VoxM @aol.com FIRST VICE PRESIDENT Judy Johnson, Mayor City of Plymouth 4600 Jewel Lane Plymouth MN 55446 johnson@ci.plymou,th.mn.us SECOND VICE PRESIDENT Bonnie Rietz, Mayor City of Austin 500 NE 4`" Avenue Austin, MN 55912 brietz@ci.austin.mn.us DIRECTORS Dan Bostrom, Councilmember City of St. Paul Room 310 B, City Hall 15 West Kellogg Blvd. St. Paul, MN 55102 dan.bostrom@ci.sipaul.mn.us Mary Hamann - Roland, Mayor City of Apple Valley 7100 West 147`s Street Apple Valley, MN 55124 info e ci apple- valley.mmus Brenda Johnson, Councilmember - City of Chatfield - - 322 Winona Street SE Chatfield, MN 55923 brendaiohnson@attglobal.net Steve Larson; Mayor City of New Brighton 2150 Erin Court New Brighton, MN 55112 stevenlarson l oacomcast.net Ray Melander, Mayor City of Nevis P.O. Box 214 Nevis, MN 56467 melander@eot.com H. Dan Ness, Mayor City of Alexandria 4110 Minnesota Street, Ste. B Alexandria, MN 56308 nesshd&ea- alp.com (Work) arsiness lea- alp.com (Home) Nelda Remus, City Clerk City of Zimmerman 12980 Fremont Ave. Zimmerman, MN 55398 nremus@,sherbtel.net Sandra Colvin Roy, Councilmember City of Minneapolis 350 S. 5" Street, Rm 307 Minneapolis, MN 55415 Sandra.colvin.roy@ci.minneapolis.mn.us Mark Sather, City Manager City of White Bear Lake 4701 Hwy. 61 N. White Bear Lake, MN ; 55110 msath er@whitebearlake. ors Terry Schneider, Councilmember City of Minnetonka 15333 Boulder Creek Drive Minnetonka; MN 55345 tern sschn@gwest.net Jeffrey Weldon, Administrator City of Redwood Falls P.O. Box 10 Redwood Falls, MN 56283 -- -iweldonnci. redwood -falls. mn.us Mark Winson, Chief Admin. Officer City of Duluth 402 City Hall 411 W. 1" Street Duluth, MN 55802 m w in son@ci. dul uth. mn. u s EX- OFFICIO MEMBERS Past President Michael McCauley, City Manager City of Brooklyn Center 6301. Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 -2199 mmccaul eye,ci.brooklyn- center.mn. us AMM President Jim Smith, Councilmember City of Independence 3858 Independence Road Maple Plain, MN 55359 jimsmith@mchsi.com NLC REPRESENTATIVES (Non- Voting Members) Del Haag, Councilmember City of Buffalo 714 NW 9`h Street Buffalo, MN 55313 delhaag_na.msn.com Les Heitke, Mayor City of Willmar 333 SW 6`h St P.O. Box 755 Willmar, MN 56201 lbeitke(a_ci. wi llmar.mn.us It is possible that the selection criteria below may change based on the LMC Board of Directors' discussion of governance issues in late September. If this occurs, revised selection criteria will be sent to you in advance of the Annual Conference. The following selection criteria has been used in previous years, however, we have changed the dates to correspond with the Annual Conference dates. Board Nominating Process and Selection Criteria I. Board nomination process. A. Nominating Committee Appointment and Orientation Process. Beginning in August of every year the League will solicit individuals interested in serving on the nominating committee. Notice of solicitation of interest shall be placed in Cities Bulletin at least twice. When necessary in order to get a sufficient number on the committee, or to achieve appropriate balance, the Executive Director may directly solicit city officials to be on the committee. 2. On or before September 15 of each year the League President shall appoint a nominating committee of 8 to 12 city officials, consisting of both elected and appointed officials with appropriate attention paid to issues such as gender, city size, and geography. The immediate past president of the Board of Directors will sit as an ex- officio member of the Committee and shall be its Chair. 3. At least one week prior to the annual conference, the Executive Director shall hold an orientation meeting of the nominating committee in order to explain the nominating committee process and to explain the Board selection criteria. B. Recruitment and Nomination Process Beginning in August of each year the League will solicit Minnesota city officials interested in serving on the League of Minnesota Cities Board of Directors. Notice of Board openings and solicitation of interest shall be placed in the August Minnesota Cities Magazine and shall run at least twice in the Cities Bulletin. In addition, prior to September 1 of each year, the Executive Director shall mail to the chief administrative officer of each member city a letter soliciting Board candidates and explaining the process and selection criteria. I 2. All candidates who wish to be considered by the nominating committee must submit an appropriate written expression of interest by September 24th. Additional material in support of particular candidates may be submitted up to the date of the nominating committee meeting. 3. Once the list of Board candidates has been compiled, the Executive Director in conjunction with the nominating committee chair shall develop an agenda and a schedule of interview times. 4. After considering the presentations of the various candidates, the nominating committee shall make its recommendations based on the requirements of the League Constitution and the Guidelines set out herein. 5. In order to avoid the appearance of a conflict of interest, nominating committee members should refrain from participating in discussions involving candidates from cities that they represent. 6. Notice of the nominating committee's recommendations shall be posted at a predetermined time in at least two locations at the annual conference site. The location of the postings shall be included in the material provided to conference attendees and shall be directly communicated to prospective candidates. 7. The Chair of the nominating committee shall be responsible for presenting the report of the nominating committee at the Annual business meeting. II. Board selection requirements and guidelines. A. Constitutional Requirements. 1. The League Constitution requires that the Board of Directors shall consist of an "elected, president, an elected first vice president, an elected second vice president, the immediate past president ex- officio, the president of the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities ex- officio, the president or vice president of the National League of Cities, if a Minnesota City official, ex- officio, and twelve directors." 2. "To be eligible to be elected to serve, or to continue to serve as an elective officer of the League, a person shall be an elected official or an appointed employee." 3. The Board of Director shall include individuals recommended by each of the following groups or entities: the city of Minneapolis, the city of St. Paul, the Minnesota Association of Small Cities, and the Coalition of Greater Minnesota Cities. Individuals recommended by these groups shall go through the Board election process. 4. Except for ex- officio seats, no city may have more than one representative on the Board at any given time. B. Non - binding Guidelines for the Nominating Committee to Consider 1. Geography a. The nominating committee will attempt to respect an appropriate balance of representation between Greater Minnesota and the Metropolitan area. b. In this same regard, the Committee will strive to maintain a similar balance when making recommendations for the president, first vice - president, and second vice - president positions. C. No particular importance will be placed on where within Greater Minnesota or the Metropolitan area a given candidate comes from. 2. Population. a. Board members should come from cities of differing size. 3. Gender a. Every effort should be made to ensure gender equity on the Board. 4. Position (Appointed v. Elected) a. A majority of the Board should be elected city officials. 5. Term a. Where there are other qualified candidates, Board members should generally serve only one term. b. An individual appointed to fill an unexpired Board term will not be prejudiced by this guideline so long as the unexpired term was for one year or less. Application for 2004 -05 LMC Board of Directors or 2004 -05 LMC Officer Positions All candidates for LMC Board of Directors or LMC Officers (President, First Vice President, Second Vice President) positions are asked to submit the following items by September 24, 2004. 1) A cover letter stating your intent to run for an LMC Board or Officer position, addressing the following points: • Why you are interested in serving in this position; • What specific attributes or experiences you would contribute to the Board or Executive Committee (made up of the LMC Officers); and • Whether you will be able to make the time commitment necessary to fulfill your Board or Officer duties (monthly Board meetings, as well as two, two -day retreats). 2) A completed "Nomination Form for LMC Board of Directors/LMC Officers Positions" (attached). 3) Optional: A resume that provides an overview of your municipal/professional experience and accomplishments. 4) Optional. Letters of reference. Note: The LMC Board of Directors expects to create job descriptions for director and officer positions in early October, immediately in advance of the Annual Conference. Upon completion, the appropriate job description will be sent to you. Please return these materials by September 24, 2004 to: Donyelle Mikacevich League of Minnesota Cities 145 University Avenue West St. Paul, MN 55103 -2044 Nomination Form — LMC Board of Directors PLEASE COMPLETE THE NOMINATION FORM PROVIDING AS MANY DETAILS AS POSSIBLE. You are encouraged to attach other materials that may be useful to the Nominating Committee during its deliberations, such as your resume and a letter stating your reasons for seeking a League office. Name: Title: Organization: Address: City /Zip: Home Phone: ( ) Work Phone: ( ) E -mail: 1. Length of service in your present position: years 2. Other municipal or related position(s) you have held and the number of years: 3. Previous League experience (e.g. committees, conferences, affiliate organizations, etc.) 4. Are you applying for (Please select one) President I" Vice President 2nd Vice President Director 5. If you are applying for Director, can you complete a full three -year term as a Board member? PLEASE RETURN THIS FORM BY September 24, 2004 TO: Donyelle Mikacevich League of Minnesota Cities 145 University Avenue West St. Paul, MN 55103 -2044 JMST TO BE ''.j .,,9 BLESSING -- 9 August 2004 Park & Recreation Department City of Edina Edina,. M 55424 Friends: I write again to thank you for your sponsorship of the First Memoriai John Philip Sousa Band. We attended their concert at Como Park and once again left lighter in spirit, gripped with nostalgia and grateful for the talent and commitment of the band. There was standing room only at Como, a tribute to the band's popularity. No one left that'sbandshell without a.smile on his or her face, and for a'moment we were able to find beauty, joy and humor in a broken world. As a former Edinan I am'proud to cali Scott and Dan Crosbier my friends.I am proud of them, I am grateful to them for sharing their considerable talent. My wife and I are still smiling today. (fatefully, -13 % T> Bud Dixen 306 Little John Circle Pines, MN 55014 JUST TO LAVE -' JS HOLY. 1:3BA ZH RM HESCHEL August 10, 2004 City of Edina 4801 West 50`h Street Edina, MN 55424 Attention Street Department The Edina street repair crew was at my house yesterday to repair the asphalt curb and roadway that had deteriorated. They took care of the problem by rebuilding the curb to redirect the storm water down the street and filled in the troughs that had developed. The crewmembers were cordial and friendly. I would like to thank your and the crew for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Donald Eyberg ' 6600 Dakota Trail Edina, MN 55439 KAY MITCHELL ��vIN 000 PHONE CLERK TO THE BOARD ? j ' L 6I2- 348 -5433 FAX 6I2- 348 -870I BOARD OF HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMISSIONERS A -2400 GOVERNMENT CENTER MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55487-0240 August 6, 2004 TO: Various Municipalities RE: HENNEPIN COUNTY APPOINTMENT TO MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT BOARD Enclosed please find a copy of an extract from the minutes of the August 3, 2004, meeting of the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners. Please note, that Mr. Lee Keeley of Plymouth, MN was appointed to fill the unexpired term of March 8, 2006 for Susan Goetz, who resigned. Yours truly, CL udy Ch ley Deputy Clerk of the Board Encl. /Q Tuesday, August 03, 2004 Applications had been solicited to fill one vacancy on the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Board. Interviews were held at the July 13, 2004 General Government Committee meeting and the selection progressed to today's meeting. Applicants were: Orvin Burma, who appeared today as he was unable to attend the committee meeting; Edward Callahan, Jr.; Daniel Flo, Charles Jacobson and Lee Keeley. A vote was taken on the vacancy, as follows: Commissioner Dorfman McLaughlin Koblick Steele Opat Stenglein Johnson Accordingly, Lee Keeley was appointed: ATTEST: Clerk of the C my Board Nomination Flo Keeley