Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002-10-15_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL OCTOBER 15, 2002 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Commissioner, Council Member or citizen so requests it. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the Agenda. * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA - Regular Meeting of October 1, 2002 * II. CONFIRMATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS - As per Pre -List dated October 9, 2002, TOTAL $9,952.88. III. ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL Fairview Southdale Hospital Thank You I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of October 1, 2002 II. PUBLIC HEARING ON SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS. Action of Council by Resolution favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council present required to pass. Rollcall A. Ramp Improvement No. P -4a -02 - 491/2 Street Parking Ramp 50th & France Avenue Business District Rollcall B. Maintenance Improvement No. M -02 - 50th & France Avenue Business District Rollcall C. Maintenance Improvement No. MG -02 - Grandview Business District Rollcall D. Tree Removal Improvement No. TR -02 - 4501 Wooddale Ave, 4229 Country Club Rd Rollcall E. Weed/ Mowing Improvement No. WM -02 - 5640 Wooddale Ave. Rollcall F. Aquatic Weeds Improvement No. AQ -01 - Arrowhead and Indianhead Lakes and Minnehaha Creek Millpond III. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS - Zoning Ordinances: First Reading requires affirmative rollcall votes of three Council members except that a rezoning from residential to non - residential requires four affirmative votes. Second Reading requires affirmative rollcall votes of three of Council to pass except rezoning from residential to non - residential requires four affirmative votes. Waiver of Second Reading: Affirmative rollcall votes of four members of Council to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: Affirmative rollcall vote of three Council members required passing. Conditional Use Permit: Affirmative rollcall vote of three Council members required to pass. Variance Appeal: Favorable rollcall of Council Members present to uphold or deny appeal Rollcall A. FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN - DQ Grill & Chill, 7700 Normandale Boulevard .twilcall B. REQUEST TO AMEND CONSERVATION RESTRICTION - 6608 Indian Hills Road, Jon and Mary Jo Barnett IV. AWARD OF BID A. Contract 02 -6 (Eng) Signals 76th & York and 76th & Edinborough, Imp. Nos. TS 27 & TS 32 Agenda/ Edina City Council October 15, 2002 Page 2 * B. Contract 02 -10 (PW) Well House Electrical & Mechanical Replacement Well #5,15, and' Imp. No. WM -406 V. REPORTS/ RECOMMENDATIONS * A. Traffic Safety Report of October 4, 2002 * B. Set Special Meeting Date to Canvass Election Results (11/6/02) - 5:00 P.M. C. Resolution No. 2002 -93, Tax Forfeit Property D. Report on Street Maintenance - 66th Street & West Shore Drive Area * E. * F. * G. * H. * I. * J. * K. * L. Resolution No. 2002 -86, Authorizing City Hall Storm Sewer Maintenance Declaration for MCWD Permit Resolution No. 2002 -87, Authorizing Traffic Control Signal Agreement with MNDOT at TH62 and Xerxes Avenue Resolution No. 2002 -88, Authorizing Traffic Control Signal Agreement with MNDOT at TH100 and West 50th Street Set Public Hearing - Vacation of Easement, Lot 3, Block 1, Arrowhead Pointe (11/19/02) Resolution No. 2002 -89, Authorizing Special Assessment Levies for: Sidewalk Imp. No. S82: 5615 Woodcrest Drive; and Curb & Gutter Imp. No. B100: 4511 Lakeview Drive Appendix "A" to Hennepin County Radio Subscriber Agreement Resolution No. 2002 -90, Authorizing TEA Grant Asbestos Abatement Change Order #1- Frattalone VI. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS VII. CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS VIII. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES IX. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL X. MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEM XI. FINANCE * A. CONFIRMATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS As per Pre -List dated October 2, 2002, TOTAL: $946,257.87 and Confirmation of Payment of Claims as per Pre -List dated October 9, 2002 TOTAL: $822,442.09. SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS Mon Nov 4 Regular Meeting /:UU r.m. k.Li uivk.iL L.n111Vinn111D Tues Nov 5 GENERAL ELECTION DAY - POLLS OPEN 7:00 A.M. UNTIL 8:00 P.M. Wed Nov 6 Canvass of Election Results 5:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mon Nov 11 VETERANS DAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed Tues Nov. 19 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Thurs Nov 28 THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed Fri Nov 29 DAY AFTER THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed Mon Dec 2 TRUTH IN TAXATION HEARING 5:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBER - Tues Dec 3 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Dec 17 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Dec 24 CHRISTMAS EVE DAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closes At Noon Wed Dec 25 CHRISTMAS DAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed Tues Dec 31 NEW YEARS EVE DAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closes at Noon t PUBLIC HEARING: Special Assessments PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS TO IMPROVE CITY'S INFRASTRUCTURE BASED ON CHAPTER 429 OF MINNESOTA STATE STATUTE PUBLIC HEARING: Special Assessments Improvement No. MG -02 MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENT GRANDVIEW BUSINESS DISTRICT -0 PUBLIC HEARING: Special Assessments Improvement No. MG -02 GRANDVIEW BUSINESS DISTRICT - L r ►nNMV"sEvMMMW,r , D6 RLEeNT v-� i sp�I eg,y NOTARY P1,t2Llt:, -�3; �'r.;r. 7TA 1 Afycowissioir m "Vv u �r1 Y1 ®r, PUBLIC HEARING: Special Assessments Improvement No. MG -02 ASSESSMENT COST: $13,490.16 TOTAL UNITS: 461,701 SO FT "BASED ON ASSESSABLE SQUARE FOOT" "1 YEAR INSTALLMENT" PROPOSED ASSESSMENT: $0.0292 PER SO FT a: PUBLIC HEARING: Special Assessments Improvement No. MG -02 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT HISTORY GRANDVIEW AREA: FYENV COST SQFTG FASSESSMENT1 1999 $ 14,01220 1 364,043 $0.0384 2000_ $ 10,67627 $0.0293 _ 2001 _364,043 $ 17,628.38 311,344 $0.0566 2002 $ 13,490.161 461,701 $0.0292 PUBLIC HEARING: Special Assessments Improvement No. MG -02 APPROVE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT MG -02 for $ 0.0292 PER SQUARE FOOT end 2 PUBLIC HEARING: Special Assessments Improvement No. M -02 MAINTENANCE IMPR( 50th and FRANCE BUSINE PUBLIC HEARING: Special Assessments Improvement No. M -02 50th and FRANCE BUSINESS DISTRICT i- J -1 PUBLIC HEARING: Special Assessments Improvement No. M -02 ASSESSMENT COST: $109,795.67 TOTAL UNITS: 339,561 SCI FT "BASED ON ASSESSABLE SQUARE FOOT" "I YEAR INSTALLMENT" PROPOSED ASSESSMENT: $0.3233 PER SQ FT 3 PUBLIC HEARING: Special Assessments Improvement No. M -02 MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT HISTORY 50TH & FRANCE AREA: YEAR COST SQFTG ASSESSMENT 1998 $ 83,966.28 324,294 $0.2588 1999 $ 96,027.85 339,561 $0.2828 2000 $ 88,474.55 339,561 $0.2606 2001 $ 80,375.37 339,561 $0.2367 2002 $ 109,795.67 339,561 $0.3233 PUBLIC HEARING: Special Assessments Improvement No. M -02 APPROVE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT M -02 for $ 0.3233 PER SQUARE FOOT end PUBLIC HEARING: Special Assessments Improvement No. P4A -02 PARKING RAMP IMPROVEMENT 50th and FRANCE BUSINESS DISTRICT {' rt weir so,,, 49112 STREET PARKING RAMP 10 PUBLIC HEARING: Special Assessments Improvement No. P4A -02 50th and FRANCE BUSINESS DISTRICT .i Js tAr 1 yt �N PUBLIC HEARING: Special Assessments Improvement No. P4A -02 ASSESSMENT COST: $109,795.67 TOTAL UNITS: 339,561 SQ FT "BASED ON ASSESSABLE SQUARE FOOT" "10 YEAR INSTALLMENTS" PROPOSED ASSESSMENT: $1.76 PER SQ FT 5 se `' PUBLIC HEARING: Special Assessments E Improvement No. P4A -02 APPROVE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT P4A -02 for $ 1.76 PER SQUARE FOOT end MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY HELD AT CITY HALL OCTOBER 1. 2002, 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica and Chair Maetzold. CONSENT AGENDA APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Hovland and seconded by Commissioner Housh approving the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Consent Agenda as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 17, 2002, APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Hovland and seconded by Commissioner Housh approving the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Minutes for September 17, 2002, as presented. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. *CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Motion made by Commissioner Hovland and seconded by- Commissioner -Housh - approving- payment- of- claims-dated- September 18, 2002, and consisting of one page totaling $36,403.53. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. there being no further business on the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Agenda, Chair Maetzold declared the meeting adjourned. Executive Director Subledger Account Description PROF FEES ARCH AND ENG 9,952.88 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 9,952.88 Total Payments 9,952.88 10/9/02 13:46:46 Page - 1 Business Unit HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE SUBDISTRIC PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL GRANDVIEW TAX DISTRICT PROF FEES ARCH AND ENG GRANDVIEW TAX DISTRICT PROF FEES ARCH AND ENG GRANDVIEW TAX DISTRICT PROF FEES ARCH AND ENG GRANDVIEW TAX DISTRICT CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 10/10/02 — 10/10/02 Check # Date Amount Vendor I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 13893 10110102 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO. 711.28 - ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANT 51406 2327C11 -28 9137.1719 711.28 13894 10110102 100730 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 3,796.60 LEGAL FEES 51407 992976 9134.6131 3,796.60 13895 10110/02 101758, SANDERS WACKER BERGLY INC. 2,945.00 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 51408 0243 -1 9134.1719 1,960.00 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 51409 0237 -2 9134.1719 540.00 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 51410 0041 -18 9134.1719 5,445.00 Subledger Account Description PROF FEES ARCH AND ENG 9,952.88 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 9,952.88 Total Payments 9,952.88 10/9/02 13:46:46 Page - 1 Business Unit HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE SUBDISTRIC PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL GRANDVIEW TAX DISTRICT PROF FEES ARCH AND ENG GRANDVIEW TAX DISTRICT PROF FEES ARCH AND ENG GRANDVIEW TAX DISTRICT PROF FEES ARCH AND ENG GRANDVIEW TAX DISTRICT R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/9/02 13:46:53 Council Check Summary Page - 1 10/10/02 - 10/10102 Company Amount 09000 HRA FUND 9,952.88 Report Totals 9,952.88 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policies and procedures dat, I) 1� 1� �vZ o e cn ,eae AGENDA ITEM: FAIRVIEW SOUTHDALE THANK YOU! M No packet data F] Oral presentation F] Information coming MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL OCTOBER 1, 2002 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica and Mayor Maetzold. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Hovland and seconded by Member Housh approving the Council Consent Agenda as presented with the exception of Agenda Item N.E., Resolution Authorizing Communications System Subscriber Agreement with Hennepin County. Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold Motion carried. MEDAL OF VALOR PRESENTED TO TEFFREY ELASKY Chief Siitari explained on August 15, 2002, a crime spree came to an end at a fast -food restaurant .in Edina due to the heroic actions of Jeffrey Elasky, an Edina Police Officer. Mr. Siitari commended other officers and dispatchers who aided the capture of one of the suspects and maintained calm throughout a time. Mayor Maetzold presented Officer Elasky with the Medal of Valor and thanked him for honoring the Policeman's oath to 'serve and protect'. RESOLUTION NO. 2002 -81 PROCLAIMING OCTOBER 6 - 13, 2002, AS FIRE PREVENTION WEEK Mayor Maetzold presented Fire Marshal Tom Jenson with a proclamation, proclaiming October 6 - 13, 2002, as Fire Prevention Week in Edina and encouraged the citizens to participate in fire prevention activities to make their homes and families safe from fire. Member Kelly introduced the following resolution and moved adoption: A PROCLAMATION. WHEREAS, fire kills 3,500 to 4,000 people in the United States each year and 80 to 85% of all fire deaths occur in the home; and WHEREAS, taking simple safety precautions, such as identifying and removing everyday home fire hazards, can help prevent the majority of home fires and home fire deaths; and WHEREAS, proper installation, testing and maintenance of smoke alarms listed by qualified testing laboratories are part of a system of fire protection, and WHEREAS, developing a home fire escape plan, with two ways out of each room and an outside meeting place, and practicing it twice a year with every member of the household, are critical to escaping a fire safely; and Page 1 Minutes/Edina City Council/October 1, 2002 WHEREAS, the nonprofit NFPA (National Fire Protection Association) has been the official sponsor of Fire Prevention Week for 80 years, the 2002 Fire Prevention Week theme, "Team Up for Fire Safety'," motivates children and families to work together to conduct a home hazard hunt, develop and practice a home fire escape plan, and install and test smoke alarms; and WHEREAS, NFPA dedicates "Team Up for Fire Safety" to the hundreds of firefighters who so valiantly gave their lives to save others in 2001, especially on September 11; and WHEREAS, the fire service of Edina is committed to the safety of life and property from the devastating effects of fire; and WHEREAS, the Edina Fire Department will be hosting their annual Open House on Sunday, October 13, 2002, from 1:00 P.M. to 4:00 P.M. with many demonstrations by the fire fighters and other organizations along with many fun activities for children, and WHEREAS, the members of the fire service are joined by other concerned citizens of Edina, as well as other emergency service providers and safety advocates, businesses, schools, service clubs, and organizations in their fire safety efforts; I, Dennis F. Maetzold, Mayor of the City of Edina, do hereby proclaim the week of October 6 -13, 2002, as Fire Prevention Week. This week commemorates the Great Chicago Fire of 1871, which killed more than 250 persons, left 100,000 homeless and destroyed more than 17,400 buildings, and serves as the motivating force to bring the people of Edina together to build a safer community. - - - - I call upon the people of Edina to "Team Up for Fire Safety" by participating in fire prevention activities at home, work and school, and taking the steps needed to make their homes and families safe from fire. In witness hereof, I hereunto set my hand this 1st day of October, in the year of two thousand and two. Member Housh seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO 2002 -83 PROCLAIMING OCTOBER, 2002, AS NATIONAL DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AWARENESS MONTH Mayor Maetzold proclaimed the month of October as National Domestic Violence Awareness Month and encouraged residents to support Cornerstone's programming and to become involved in the effort to end domestic violence. Member Masica made a motion approving the following proclamation:: National Domestic Violence Awareness Month October 2002 WHEREAS, the month of October is declared National Domestic Violence Awareness Month; and Page 2 J Minutes/Edina City Council/October 1, 2002 WHEREAS, nearly one in three adult women experience at least one physical assault by a partner during adulthood; and WHEREAS, young women, between the ages of 16-24 in dating relationships experience the highest rate of domestic violence and sexual assault; and WHEREAS, each year, an estimated 3.3 million children witness their mothers or female caretakers being abused; and WHEREAS, research suggests that early childhood victimization, either through direct abuse, neglect, or witnessing parental domestic violence, has demonstrable long -term consequences for youth violence, adult violent behaviors, and other forms of criminality; and WHEREAS, increased awareness and education about domestic violence and the resources available to victims is a step toward the solution. NOW, THEREFORE I, Dennis Maetzold, Mayor of the City of Edina, do hereby proclaim October 2002 as Domestic Violence Awareness Month in the City of Edina And urge all individuals in Edina to become aware of the dynamics of domestic violence, the effects on families and our community, and when appropriate, seek help from Cornerstone, the local agency that serves victims of domestic violence. I further encourage residents to support Cornerstone's programming, and to become involved in the effort to end domestic violence. Dated this 1st day of October, 2002. Member Hovland seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 17, 2002, APPROVED Motion made by Member Hovland and seconded by Member Housh, approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Edina City Council for September 17, 2002. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. 2003 CITY OPERATING BUDGET REVIEWED Manager Hughes presented the proposed budget based upon projections presented during the planning workshop and contains guidelines established by the Council. Edina continues to be subject to state - imposed levy limits, better termed as 'revenue limits' in that the amount of property taxes collected in 2003 will be based upon the 2002 tax levy as adjusted by 1) household growth, C/ I growth and 3) inflationary adjustment. The inflationary adjustment is based upon the "implicit price deflator' which provides a more restrictive standard of inflation than traditional measures such as the CPI. Our 2003 levy limit will restrict the City to a 1.13% general fund tax increase. Mr. Hughes noted the 2003 budget proposes the issuance of short -term general obligations for the purpose of financing purchase of replacement equipment and furnishings. Previously, the purchase of equipment was funded through the general fund tax levy. Staff proposes issuing "equipment certificates" in the amount of $1,494,000 later in the fall and will finance, 1) a portion of equipment replacement needs Page 3 v Minutes/Edina City Council/October 1, 2002 over the next two years and, 2) furnishings and fixtures for the new City Hall. One advantage of issuing equipment certificates is state law permits the City to repay such obligations by levying a tax outside the levy limits. Low interest rates allow borrowing for such purchases at an economical rate. Mr. Hughes elaborated that Standard and Poor's was made aware of the prospect that issuing equipment certificates was a possibility and upgraded our bond rating to AAA with that knowledge. Equipment replacement budgets of the Fire, Public Works and Park Departments have been reduced by the respective amount of the proceeds of equipment certificates that will be used to purchase replacement equipment in those departments. Sharon Ming, Chair Human Relations Commission, pointed out the funding history in the packet information and called for questions. Member Masica inquired about the School District Chemical Health Coordinator portion of the 2003 budget. Manager Hughes explained the new school district position would be funded through the district and from grants. He voiced concern with funding the item because the City already funds Kathy Iverson's Chemical Health Coordinator position. He said he believed the position to be a school district staff position. Ms. Ming elaborated that the Human Relations Commission supports the Chemical Health Coordinator position because chemicals are a concern outside of school as well. The proposed position will be at the district level. Funding is primarily from grants and could be as much as $50,000 to- $60;000 per- year- for - the -position. Partnering with the City and School District affords an opportunity to build a relationship with all concerned parties. Member Housh inquired whether the position has been posted. Ms. Ming said the position would be scaled back if all funding is not in place. Ms. Masica asked what level of abuse is in the schools. Ms. Ming responded that most abuse is anecdotal and drunk or high students make teaching impossible. Ms. Masica asked if the funding were approved would it encourage interventions. Ms. Ming noted the job description for the position is specific to broad chemical training expertise. Ms. Masica asked where the Police refer an obviously drunk or high youth. Chief Siitari said if there is a problem, they are arrested so the charge appears on their record. Mr. Housh asked how the new resource center is working. Ms. Ming explained they have been busy putting together by -laws and documents to qualify for LCTS revenues. Mr. Housh asked if the budgeted dollars would be used to finish up the relationship with Hennepin South Services and develop new partnerships. Ms. Ming said after the Commission has taken a brief hiatus, a focus group has been formed to brainstorm a direction for the Commission. Mr. Housh inquired whether a study is being done to see how much overlap there is in services in the community. Ms. Ming said the Edina Page 4 Minutes/Edina City Council/October 1, 2002 resource center will work with a consultant to do community mapping which would be the first step. Member Hovland asked if Ms. Ming could provide numbers of persons served for 2002 to substantiate the request for a 27% increase in the proposal. Ms. Ming responded the need for services grows each year because of the demographics of Edina. Mr. Hovland said when budget decisions are made; they must be based on facts. Ms. Ming said she would provide the numbers, as requested. Mr. Hovland commented upon reading the Human Relations Commissions minutes it seems they would like input into the job description for the Chemical Health Coordinator. Ms. Ming said the school district has altered the job description to include an advisory chemical health committee made up of. community members. She said that committee exists and the school district has been made aware of it. Mr. Hovland said he wanted more information about this position before a vote is taken. Ms. Ming said she would provide the Council with a copy of the job description. Mr. Hovland questioned what the proposed budget amount of $22,074.00 will be spent on. Ms. Ming said the amount is the same figure proposed in years past with an inflation factor included and will be used to get projects completed. These projects could be staff costs, consultant costs or space costs. The Commission does not want the funds to be used for administrative overhead. Mr. Hovland asked to be provided with data from the resource center, such as level of service, hours of operation, etc. Ms. Ming said she would- provide-the -information-that she would be able to acquire. Manager Hughes stated that he serves on the Board of Director's of the Senior Community Services Committee, as Treasurer as well as the Dial -a -Ride Program. He receives no financial gain from service on that board. Member Housh made a motion seconded by Member Kelly closing the public hearing. Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold Motion carried. Following the public hearing the Council conducted a categorical review of the budget beginning with General Government. Staff answered questions specific to various line items including: future expenditures, revenues, reporting methods, and investment policies. Mr. Hughes stated any additional information will be brought to future meetings. Mayor Maetzold noted no action will be taken on the 2003 Operating Budget until after the Truth In Taxation hearings scheduled in December. No formal Council action was taken. Page 5 Minutes/Edina City Council/October 1, 2002 *CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Member Hovland made a motion and Member Housh seconded the motion approving payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated September 18, 2002, and consisting of 32 pages: General Fund $123,488.85; CDBG Fund $40.00; Communications Fund $653.17; Working Capital Fund $66,119.03, Construction Fund $395,680.73; Art Center Fund $2,313.04; Golf Dome Fund $75.70; Aquatic Center Fund $5,464.94; Golf Course Fund $19,225.98; Ice Arena Fund $2,040.60; Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fund $10,604.86; Liquor Fund $190,943.00; Utility Fund $414,134.58; Storm Sewer Fund $12,102.05; Recycling Fund $3,385.64; Payroll Fund $355,000.00; TOTAL $1,601,272.17; and for approval of payment of claims dated September 25, 2002, and consisting of 32 pages: General Fund $202,218.67, Communications Fund $16,446.92; Working Capital Fund $25,786.14, Construction Fund $25,082.83; Art Center Fund $19,065.42; Aquatic Center Fund $497.99; Golf Course Fund $8,896.58; Ice Arena Fund $4,646.84, Edinborough/ Centennial Lakes Fund $2,826.98; Liquor Fund $124,809.53; Utility Fund $82,295.83; Storm Sewer Fund $93,428.83; TOTAL $606,002.56. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *PUBLIC HEARING DATE SET FOR PLANNING MATTERS Motion made by Member Hovland and seconded by Member Housh setting October 15, 2002, as hearing date for planning matters: 1. Final Development Plan - Dairy Queen (7700 Normandale Boulevard) Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *RESOLUTION NO. 2002 -85, LOT DIVISION APPROVED FOR 6201 BROOKVIEW AVENUE AND 4213 WEST 62ND STREET Motion made by Member Hovland and seconded by Member Housh introducing the following resolution and moving its approval: RESOLUTION NO. 2002-85 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A LOT DIVISION FOR 6201 BROOKVIEW AVENUE AND 4213 WEST 62ND STREET WHEREAS, the following described property are at present two single tracts of land: AND That part of Outlot 1, HIPPE'S PAMELA TERRACE, which lies northerly of the following described line: Commencing at the corner of said Outlot 1, which lies on the west line of said Outlot 1 at a point 100 feet south of the northwest corner thereof; thence southeasterly along the southerly line of said Outlot 1, which intersects said west line at said corner and said line extended to the east line of Outlot 1, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for said Hennepin County. Page 6 Minutes/Edina City Council/October 1, 2002 Apartments No. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, Apartment Ownership No. 94 VALLEY VIEW ESTATES, Hennepin County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the owner has requested the subdivision of said tracts into separate parcels (herein called "Parcels ") described as follows: PARCEL 1: Apartments No. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 APARTMENT OWNERSHIP NO. 94 VALLEY VIEW ESTATES, and that part of Outlot 1, HIPPE'S PAMELA TERRACE described as lying southerly, westerly and northerly of the following described line: Beginning at the northwest corner of Outlot 1; thence South 89 degrees 43 minutes 00 seconds East assumed bearing along the north line of said Outlot 1 a distance of 2.80 feet, thence South 00 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West a distance of 72.41 feet; thence South 02 degrees 47 minutes 47 seconds West a distance of 28.25 feet; thence North 71 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds West along the southerly line of said Outlot 1 a distance of 1.40 feet to a point 100.00 feet south of the northwest corner of said Outlot 1 as measured along the west line of said Outlot 1 and there terminating. PARCEL 2: That part of Outlot 1, HIPPE'S PAMELA TERRACE, which lies northerly of the following described line: Commencing at the corner of said Outlot 1, which lies on the west line of said Outlot 1 at a point 100 feet south of the northwest corner thereof, thence southeasterly along the southerly line of said Outlot 1, which intersects said west line at said corner and said line extended to the east line of Outlot 1, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the Office of the Registrar of Titles in and for said Hennepin County, except that part lying southerly, westerly, and northerly of the following described line: Beginning at the northwest corner of Outlot 1, thence South 89 degrees 43 minutes 00 seconds East assumed bearing along the north line of said Outlot 1 a distance of 2.80 feet, thence South 00 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West a distance of 72.41 feet; thence South 02 degrees 47 minutes 47 seconds West a distance of 28.25 feet, thence North 71 degrees 30 minutes 00 seconds West along the southerly line of said Outlot 1 a distance of 1.40 feet to a point 100.00 feet south of the northwest corner of said Outlot 1 as measured along the west line of said Outlot 1 and there terminating. WHEREAS, the requested subdivision is authorized under Code Section 810 and it has been determined with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City Page 7 Minutes/Edina City Council/October 1, 2002 of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purpose of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Code Sections 810 and 850; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of the above described Parcels as separate tracts of land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Code Sections 850 and 810 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but only to the extent permitted under Code Sections 810a and 850 subject to the limitations set out in Code Section 850 and said Ordinances are not waived for any other purpose or as to any other provisions thereof, and further subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances. ADOPTED this 1st day of October, 2002. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *RESOLUTION NO. 2002 -84 APPOINTING ELECTION JUDGES FOR GENERAL ELECTION NOVEMBER 5, 2002 Motion made by Member Hovland and seconded by Member Housh introducing the following resolution and moving its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2002-84 APPOINTING ELECTION JUDGES FOR THE NOVEMBER 5, 2002 GENERAL ELECTION WHEREAS, Minnesota Election Law 204B.21 requires that persons serving as election judges be appointed by the Council at least 25 days before the election. BE IT RESOLVED BY the Edina City Council that the individuals named on Exhibit A, and on file in the office of the City Clerk be appointed as election judges for the general election to be conducted on November 5, 2002; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is with this, authorized to make any substitutions or additions as deemed necessary. Passed and adopted by the Edina City Council this 1st day of October, 2002. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. PUBLIC HEARING HELD; NEW LIQUOR LICENSE FOR MAGGIANO'S APPROVED Manager Hughes indicated Maggiano's /Corner Bakery, Inc., dba /Maggiano's Little Italy, 2685 Southdale Center has applied for an intoxicating liquor license necessitating the need for a public hearing. Maggiano's has submitted appropriate applications, insurance and paid all applicable fees. Mr. Hughes said the Planning Department, Health Department and Police Department have completed their investigation with no negative findings. Staff recommended issuance of an on -sale intoxicating liquor license and an on -sale Sunday license to Maggiano's. Page 8 r Minutes/Edina City Council/October 1, 2002 Member Hovland made a motion, seconded by Member Housh to close the public hearing. Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold Motion carried. Member Hovland made a motion approving the on -sale intoxicating liquor license and on -sale Sunday license to Maggiano's /Corner Bakery, Inc., dba/ Maggiano's Little Italy, located at 2685 Southdale Center for the term from October 1, 2002, to March 31, 2003. Member Masica seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold Motion carried. *REPORT RECEIVED REGARDING TELEVISING CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS Motion made by Member Hovland and seconded by Member Housh acknowledging receipt of the report regarding the televising of City Council meetings. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. SOUTH METRO PUBLIC SAFETY TRAINING CENTER ADDITIONAL EXPENDITURE APPROVED Manager Hughes indicated the Joint Powers Association received bids on September 5, 2002, for the South Metro Public Safety Training Facility. The bids were in excess of estimated costs, a donation has been received from an Edina resident in the amount of $100,000 to defray costs. With this donation, the City's cash --contribution-to-the training center-remains within budget. Bids were also received for the inclusion of a "decision training range' in the training center, described as a four lane, firearms training range, 50 feet maximum length from the firing line to the targets, for use with handguns and MP5's. The advantages of the range were presented in a memo from Erickson Architects, 5324 Emerson Avenue South, Minneapolis and were: • lower operating costs for small groups • flexibility of not tying up large range for training one or two officers' • increased rental income • possible use for live fire simulation training The Joint Powers Association is inclined to accept the bids for the range and believes the facility will be extremely beneficial from a training standpoint as well as for public use. Inclusion of this range would result in the need for an additional capital contribution from each of the partners. Based upon the agreed -upon allocation, Edina's share would total approximately $80,000. Mr. Hughes said if this added cost were approved, funds would come from the City's forfeiture fund, which presently has a balance of $110,000. Funds may only be expended on police - related projects. Page 9 Minutes/Edina City Council/October 1, 2002 Chief Siitari commented this proposed "decision training range' would be similar to the facility in Maple Grove which historically is booked solid. The smaller range would be beneficial for the remedial or new shooters. Rather than tying up the large range, use of the smaller range would cure disruptions in the facility and maintain a desired flexibility and opportunity. Mr. Hughes noted the second range gives flexibility for shooting by the public as well as federal security personnel training at the facility that are associated with the airport. He said he believes this is a good investment. Member Housh inquired whether the Park and Recreation Department might be able to use the range like they did in the past. Mr. Hughes said that is another reason why the "decision training range" would be beneficial. Member Masica questioned the salaries of the trainers. Mr. Hughes explained the operation of the facility would be through the Joint Powers Association with an operating board and perhaps a facility manager. It is proposed that much of the training can be done by training officers within the respective department. Ms. Masica asked what the projections are for revenues for rental of the facility. Mr. Hughes said a number of departments in the area have expressed an interest in renting the facility. Member Masica made a motion approving the additional expenditure of approximately $80,000 to- allow - construction of- a- "decision- training - range" as part of the South Metro Public Safety Training Facility. Member Housh seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 2002 -82 AUTHORIZING COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM SUBSCRIBER AGREEMENT WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY Member Hovland asked Resolution No. 2002 -82, Authorizing Communications System Subscriber Agreement with Hennepin County be removed from the consent agenda questioning whether Appendix A, as noted in the report was inadvertently omitted from the packet. Chief Scheerer gave estimated amounts that the communications system would cost to lease and added that Appendix A would be included in the packet for October 15, 2002. Member Hovland introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2002-82 AUTHORIZING COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM SUSCRIBER AGREEMENT WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY WHEREAS, Hennepin County operates a Local Subsystem as part of the Regionwide Public Safety Radio Communications system, hereinafter referred to as "System "; and Page 10 Minutes/Edina City Council/October 1, 2002 WHEREAS, Hennepin County has provided for the capability of Cities, Agencies, Districts and Other Authorized Users within the County to have access 'to the System, and WHEREAS, Hennepin County bears primary responsibility for the health, security and integrity of the System and other communications systems; and WHEREAS, the City of Edina has elected to participate as a subscriber with end user radios operating on the System. NOW,, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual undertakings and agreement hereinafter set forth, Hennepin County and the City of Edina authorize the Mayor and the City Manager to enter into the agreement. Member Kelly seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold Motion carried. MEMORANDUM RECEIVED FROM RESIDENTS ON SHORES OF LAKE HARVEY A memorandum was received from residents living on the shores of Lake Harvey in support of the removal of "volunteer and scrub" trees along the public shoreline. Member Kelly asked if there is some sort of watershed, shoreline regulation. Engineer Houle clarified that it is perhaps a buffer regulation but there is not one designated with Hennepin County on Lake Harvey. Susan Covnick, 4708 Lakeview Drive, said there are two concerns, 1) volunteer scrub trees and 2) water quality. She presented an expanded petition, which included neighbors living on Lake Harvey. Ms. Covnick presented pictures of Birchcrest Lake and explained its similarity with Lake Harvey and stated that residents would like their area to resemble the Birchcrest area. She showed a picture of the "volunteer and scrub" trees she would like removed. A letter dated October 1, 2002, from Vincent and Martha Driessen was received in favor of the water quality in Lake Harvey being improved. Maria Fesenmeier, 5713 Concord Avenue, President of the Edina Community Center Neighborhood Association, voiced concern with the aesthetic and safety issues of the lake. She noted she has been in contact with the DNR and Lake Harvey is a DNR protected basin. She has worked with City staff to determine the depth of the lake with no records being available. The DNR will do a study on the conditions of the Lake as well as shoreline issues of concern. If the DNR proves the Lake would benefit from dredging, etc., grants are available. The neighborhood would like the Lake to be restored. Page 11 Minutes/Edina City Council/October 1, 2002 Manager Hughes said he believes if the DNR is willing to review the water quality of the Lake that process should go forward. He suggested representatives of the neighborhood and park staff meet and find a common denominator to resolve the concerns. Following a brief Council discussion staff directed Director Keprios to work with the neighborhood and reach an equitable conclusion. PETITION RECEIVED REGARDING STREET SWEEPING STREETS EAST OF HIGHWAY 100 BETWEEN TH 62 70TH STREET AND WEST SHORE DRIVE Manager Hughes noted that a petition had been received from Kenneth M. Chavis, 6509 Ryan Avenue, regarding street cleaning on streets east of Highway 100 between TH62, 70th Street and bordered by West Shore Drive. Mr. Hughes indicated that contact will be made with Mr. Chavis as well as information about the policy for street cleaning, etc., will be included in the packet of the October 15, 2002, regular meeting. CONCERN OF RESIDENT Chris Wilson, 5136 15th Avenue South, Minneapolis, said she is on the staff of Association of Metropolitan Municipalities (AMM) and is continuing her education in public administration through Hamline University. She said she was observing the interaction between the Council and staff at this meeting. She elaborated that the AMM is busy monitoring the Metropolitan Council in particular with the regional growth strategy called Blueprint 20/30. A public hearing will be held October 16, 2002, and she encouraged - examining the document. The AMM is also gearing up for the Legislative Session, which will begin soon. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Maetzold declared the meeting adjourned at 9:30 P.M. City Clerk Page 12 f i To: Mayor & City Council From: John Wallin Finance Director Date: . October 15, 2002 Subject: Special Assessment Interest Rate Recommendation: RE PORURECOM M E N DATION Agenda Item # II.A -F Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion I recommend that the City set the rate for special assessments at 6.5% for the assessments proposed to be levied on October 15. This rate is- appropriate based on the current and projected interest rate environment as well as rates charged by other cities. Info /Background: The current interest rate being charged on special assessments is 7.5 %. The City has in the past determined the interest rate for assessments by adding 2% over the net interest rate of the bonds which funded the project and would be of a like ten year period. The City has not issued improvement bonds for a number,of years. The 7.5 interest rate has been charged for all special assessments since the last bonds were issued. I called two of our neighboring cities to see what other are doing. Bloomington has a two tier rate with engineered projects being charged 6.5% and other assessments such as weeds, trees, delinquent utility and citations being charged 8 %. Eden Prairie will charge 6.5% an all assessments. When there is no improvement bond dependant on special assessments, state statutes provide that special assessments may bear interest at any rate the Council determines. 0- e o REPORT/RECOMMENDATION • f N� ie'weas To: Mayor & City Council From: Wayne Houle, PE Director of Public Works / City Engineer Date: October 15, 2002 Subject: Public Hearings for Special Assessments: • P4A -02: 49'/2 Street Ramp Im�. M -02: 50t & France Business District G -02: Grandview Business District Recommendation: Agenda Item # Consent Information Only Mgr. Recommends Action II. A -C. ❑ To HRA ® To Council ❑ Motion ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Approve assessments as proposed for Improvements NA -02, M02, and MG02. Info /Background: Attached you will find an Analysis of Assessment and a Final Assessment Roll for each proposed assessment. All properties were noticed per Minnesota State Statute — Chapter 429 for special assessments. The only comments received as of this writing regard the individual notices sent to property owners of NA -02, where the assessment payback time was incorrectly stated as 1 year and should be 10 years. The properties were renotified with this change. Improvement M02 — The 50th and France Business District assessment charge changed from%.09 cents per square foot in 2001 to 32.33 cents in 2002. This change reflects additional moneys spent on ice control during the winter months of 2002 and also increased maintenance costs of the infrastructure within the District. Improvement G02 — The Grandview maintenance assessment charge changed from 5 66 cents er square foot in 2001 to 2:92 cents in 2002. This change reflects the P additional commercial square footage added to the District in 2002. CITY OF EDINA ANALYSIS OF ASSESSMENT FOR: 49 112 STREET RAMP IMPROVEMENT NO. P4a -02 LOCATION: 49 112 STREET RAMP CONTRACTOR: KNUTSON CONSTRUCTION $ 306,750.80 CENTER FOR ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT 184,799.93 WALKER PARKING CONSULTANTS 1,266.31 PERKINS LANDSCAPE 8,820.00 DAKOTA FENCE 3,029.00 Landscaping 30,000.00 ENGINEERING ENGINEERING 6% 18,405.05 CLERICAL 2% CLERICAL 6,135.02 PUBLISHING & SUPPLIES: PUBLISHING & SUPPLIES 250.00 CAPITALIZED INTEREST: FROM: December 31, 2000 TO: October 15, 2002 653 DAYS @ 63.03 PER DAY 41,1' _ TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST: $ 600.614.69 ASSESSABLE UNITS: 339,561 ASSESSABLE SQUARE FEET ASSESSABLE COST: PROPOSED ASSESSMENT: $1.76 PER SQ. FT. ASSESSABLE UNITS: ASSESSABLE COST: FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLE PARKING RAMP IMPROVEMENT P4A -02 50th and FRANCE BUSINESS DISTRICT CITY OF EDINA, MN PID I NAME 1 NAME 2 PROP. ADD. NO ADDRESS CITY ST ZIP I SF X $1.769 18 -028 -24-14 -0016 1 SAVERY HOTEL, LC (Walgreens) WM. C. KNAPP REVOCABLE TRUST 4916 France 5000 IWESTOWN PARKWAY #100 IWEST DES MOINES IIA 502661 4,955 8,764.39 18 -028 -24 -14 -0019 JEDINA PROPERTIES INC 4936 France 4100150TH ST W, #2100 EDINA IMN 554241 13,150 23,259.69 18 -028 -24 -14 -0020 FRANCE AVE PROPERTIES C/O K.C.S. MANAGEMENT CO. 4948 France 8100 12TH AVE S #200 BLOOMINGTON MN 55425F 6,988 12,360.36 18 -028 -24 -14 -0021 FRANCE AVE PROPERTIES C/O K.C.S. MANAGEMENT CO. 3902 W 50th 8100 8100 12TH AVE S #200 BLOOMINGTON MN 554251 7,747 13,702.88 18- 028 -24 -14 -0022 EDINA PROPERTIES INC 3906 W 50th 4100 50TH ST W. #2100 EDINA MN 55424 22,583 39,944.76 18 -028 -24 -14 -0024 ASPEN PLUS HEALTH NETWORK 3918 W 49 112 1020 BANDANA BLVD E, #200 ST. PAUL MN 55108 4,480 7,924.21 18 -028 -24- 14-0026 JAMES W. NELSON C/O CARRINGTON INVEST. PROP. 3930 W 49 1/2 2888 JOPPA AVE ST. LOUIS PARK MN 55416 12,395 21,924.25 18- 028 -24 -14 -0034 EDINA HRA 3940 W 49 1/2 4801 50TH ST W EDINA MN 55424 0 0.00 18 -028 -24 -14 -0035 FLOYD & ANN HOOTEN 3944 W 49112 3813 SHERIDAN AVE S MINNEAPOLIS MN 55410 2,460 4,386.62 18 -028- 24- 14-0046 FIRST BANK SYSTEM US BANK PROPERTIES MGMT. 4100 W 50th 601 2ND AVE S MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 23,234 41,096.24 18 -028 -24- 14-0108 1905 PARTNERSHIP LLP C/O KLEINMAN REALTY CO 3948 W 49 1/2 1409 WILLOW ST #109 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55403 3,536 6,254.47 18 -028 -24-14 -0118 RECHELBACHAR PROP., LLC ATTN: CHANTAL 4930 France 321 LINCOLN ST NE MINNEAPOLIS MN 55413 2,347 4,151.37 18 -028 -24- 14-0119 GIORGIO CHERUBINI 4924 France 1601 LAKE ST W MINNEAPOLIS MN 1 551081 2,892 5,115.36 18 -028 -24 -14 -0119 GIORGIO CHERUBINI 4924 France 4924 FRANCE AVE S EDINA MN 554101 0 0.00 18- 028 -24 -14 -0121 CORP. RE MGR FACILITIES DEPT TCF BANK SAVINGS 3924 W 50th 801 MARQUETTE AVE MINNEAPOLIS MN 554021 12,960 22,923.62 18 -028 -24-14 -0122 PROPERTY ADMINISTRATION CO. 3922 W 50th 3801 50TH ST W EDINA MN 55410 12,105 21,411.30 18 -028 -24- 14-0126 L.A. REAL ESTATE GROUP ETAL 3930 W 50th 4100 50TH ST W. #2100 EDINA MN 55424 62,680 110,868.24 18 -028 -24-41 -0049 EDINA PROPERTIES INC 3925 W 50th 4100 50TH ST W. #2100 EDINA MN 55424 26,635 1 47,111.92 18 -028 -24-41 -0052 LOEWS CINEPLEY ENTRTNMNT 612 ATTN: REAL ESTATE ACCTG. 3911 W 50th 711 5TH AVE, 7TH FLOOR NEW YORK NY 10022 27,835 49,234.48 18- 028 -24-41 -0052 PLITT THEATRES INC C/O STRATEGIS 3911 W 50th P 0 BOX 59365 SCHAUMBURG IL 60159 0 0.00 18- 028 -2441 -0055 JOAN NOLAN 5034 France 5030 FRANCE AVE S MINNEAPOLIS MN 55410 9,002 15,922.72 18 -028 -24-41 -0055 18 -028- 2441 -0066 18- 028 -24 -41 -0066 18 -028- 2441 -0178 18 -028- 2441 -0178 18 -028- 2441 -0179 18- 028 -24-41 -0181 18 -028- 2441 -0182 18 -028- 2441 -0186 18 -028 -24-41 -0237 BARBARA & SIAH ARMAJNAI 5036 FRANCE AVE S LTD. PTNRSP. FRANK KREISER LUND REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS LLC 3945 W 50TH ASSOCIATES MOHAMOKO ASSOC. LLP CITY OF EDINA 50TH & FRANCE OFFICE BLDG CHARLIE NADLER AMERICANA STATE BANK OF EDINA C/O HAUGLAND COMPANY FRANCHISE ASSOCIATES EXCEL BANK 5034 France 5036 France 5036 France 3945 W 50th 3945 W 50th 5000 France 3939 W 50th 3939 W 50th 5020 France 5050 France 5034 75501 5036 4100 4100 5850 4801 3939 5354 5050 FRANCE AVE S FRANCE AVE S FRANCE AVE S 50TH ST W #2100 50TH ST W #2100 OPUS PARKWAY, SUITE 108 50TH ST W 50TH ST W #200 PARKDALE DR., SUITE 100 FRANCE AVE S EDINA MINNEAPOLIS EDINA EDINA EDINA MINNEAPOLIS EDINA EDINA MINNEAPOLIS EDINA MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN MN 55410 55410 554101 554241 55424 55343 55424 55424 55416 55410 0 5,875 0 13,449 ol 13,9691 2,400 30,064 1,158 14,642 0.00 10,391.69 0.00 23,788.56 0.00 24,708.33 4,245.11 53,177.13 2,048.27 25,898.73 600,614.69 339,561 Page 1 CITY OF EDINA - ANALYSIS OF ASSESSMENT FOR: MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENT NO. M -02 LOCATION: 50TH & FRANCE BUSINESS DISTRICT CONTRACTOR: CITY OF EDINA (LARRY DIEKMAN) 37,243.84 EMPLOYER'S SHARE OF PERA 1,668.52 EMPLOYER'S SHARE OF HOSPITALIZATION 5,160.00 PUBLIC WORKS CREW AND 1/2 PARKING MONITOR 15,778.46 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 0.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: 0.00 GENERAL SUPPLIES 38,364.85 BALANCE OF TRACTOR 0.00 PARKING RAMP MAINTENANCE (375) 11,330.00 PUBLISHING & SUPPLIES 250.00 TOTAL COST 109,795.67 ASSESSABLE UNITS: 339,561 ASSESSABLE SQUARE FEET ASSESSABLE COST: PROPOSED ASSESSMENT: $.3233 PER SQ. FT. Page 2 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLE MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENT M -02 50th and FRANCE BUSINESS DISTRICT CITY OF EDINA, MN PID NAME 1 NAME 2 PROP. ADD. NO ADDRESS CITY ST ZIP SF X_0.323 18- 028 -24 -14 -0016 SAVERY HOTEL, LC (Walgreens) WM. C. KNAPP REVOCABLE TRUST 4916 France 5000 WESTOWN PARKWAY #100 WEST DES MOINES IIA 1 50266 4,955 1,602.18 18 -028 -24 -14 -0019 EDINA PROPERTIES INC 4936 France 4100 50TH ST W. #2100 EDINA MN 55424 13,150 4,252.00 18- 028 -24 -14 -0020 FRANCE AVE PROPERTIES C/O K.C.S. MANAGEMENT CO. 4948 France 8100 12TH AVE S #200 BLOOMINGTON MN 55425 6,988 2,259.54 18- 028 -24 -14 -0021 FRANCE AVE PROPERTIES C/O K.C.S. MANAGEMENT CO. 3902 W 50th 8100 8100 12TH AVE S #200 BLOOMINGTON MN 55425 7,747 2,504.96 18- 028 -24 -14 -0022 EDINA PROPERTIES INC 3906 W 50th 4100 50TH ST W. #2100 EDINA MN 55424 22,583 7,302.12 18- 028 -24 -14 -0024 ASPEN PLUS HEALTH NETWORK 3918 W 49 1/2 1020 BANDANA BLVD E, #200 ST. PAUL MN 55108 4,480 1,448.59 18- 028 -24 -14 -0026 JAMES W. NELSON C/O CARRINGTON INVEST. PROP. 3930 W 49 1/2 2888 JOPPA AVE ST. LOUIS PARK MN 55416 12,395 4,007.87 18 -028 -24 -14 -0034 EDINA HRA 3940 W 491/2 4801 50TH ST W EDINA MN 55424 0 0.00 18- 028 -24 -14 -0035 FLOYD & ANN HOOTEN 3944 W 49 1/2 3813 SHERIDAN AVE S MINNEAPOLIS MN 55410 2,480 801.90 18- 028 -24 -14 -0046 FIRST BANK SYSTEM US BANK PROPERTIES MGMT. 4100 W 50th 601 2ND AVE S MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 23,234 7,512.62 18- 028 -24 -14 -0108 1905 PARTNERSHIP LLP C/O KLEINMAN REALTY CO 3948 W 49 1/2 1409 WILLOW ST #109 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55403 3,536 1,143.35 18- 028 -24 -14 -0118 RECHELBACHAR PROP., LLC ATTN: CHANTAL 4930 France 321 LINCOLN ST NE MINNEAPOLIS MN 55413 2,347 758.89 18- 028 -24 -14 -0119 GIORGIO CHERUBINI 4924 France 1601 LAKE ST W MINNEAPOLIS MN 55108 2,892 935.12 18- 028 -24 -14 -0119 GIORGIO CHERUBINI 4924 France 4924 FRANCE AVE S EDINA MN 55410 0 0.00 18- 028 -24 -14 -0121 CORP. RE MGR FACILITIES DEPT TCF BANK SAVINGS 3924 W 50th 801 MARQUETTE AVE MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402 12,960 4,190.56 18- 028 -24 -14 -0122 PROPERTY ADMINISTRATION CO. 3922 W 50th 3801 50TH ST W EDINA MN 55410 12,105 3,914.10 18- 028 -24 -14 -0126 L.A. REAL ESTATE GROUP ETAL 3930 W 50th 4100 50TH ST W, #2100 EDINA MN 55424 62,680 20,267.32 18 -028 -24-41 -0049 EDINA PROPERTIES INC 3925 W 50th 4100 50TH ST W. #2100 EDINA MN 55424 26,635 8,612.32 18- 028 -24-41 -0052 LOEWS CINEPLEY ENTRTNMNT 612 ATTN: REAL ESTATE ACCTG. 3911 W 50th 71115TH AVE, 7TH FLOOR NEW YORK NY 10022 27,835 9,000.33 18- 028 -24-41 -0052 PLITT THEATRES INC C/O STRATEGIS 3911 W 50th P 0 BOX 59365 SCHAUMBURG IL 60159 0 0.00 18 -028 -24-41 -0055 JOAN NOLAN 5034 France 5030 FRANCE AVE S MINNEAPOLIS MN 55410 9,002 2,910.76 18 -028 -24-41 -0055 BARBARA & SIAH ARMAJNAI 5034 France 5034 FRANCE AVE S EDINA MN 55410 0 0.00 18 -028 -24-41 -0066 5036 FRANCE AVE S LTD. PTNRSP. 5036 France 7550 FRANCE AVE S MINNEAPOLIS MN 55410 5,875 1,899.66 18- 028 -24-41 -0066 FRANK KREISER 5036 France 5036 FRANCE AVE S EDINA MN 55410 0 0.00 18- 028 -24-41 -0178 LUND REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS LLC 3945 W 50th 4100 50TH ST W #2100 EDINA MN 55424 13,449 4,348.68 18- 028 -24-41 -0178 3945 W 50TH ASSOCIATES 3945 W 50th 4100 50TH ST W #2100 EDINA MN 55424 0 0.00 18 -028 -24-41 -0179 MOHAMOKO ASSOC. LLP C/O HAUGLAND COMPANY 5000 France 5850 OPUS PARKWAY, SUITE 108 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55343 13,969 4,516.82 18- 028 - 2441 -0181 CITY OF EDINA 3939 W 50th 4801 50TH ST W EDINA MN 55424 2,400 776.03 18 -028 -24-41 -0182 50TH & FRANCE OFFICE BLDG 3939 W 50th 3939 50TH ST W #200 EDINA MN 55424 30,064 9,721.07 18- 028 -24-41 -0186 CHARLIE NADLER FRANCHISE ASSOCIATES 5020 France 5354 PARKDALE DR., SUITE 100 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55416 1,158 374.43 18 -028 -24-41 -0237 AMERICANA STATE BANK OF EDINA EXCEL BANK 5050 France 5050 FRANCE AVE S EDINA MN 55410 14,642 4,734.43 339,561 109,795.67 Page 1 CITY OF EDINA - ANALYSIS OF ASSESSMENT FOR: MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENT NO. G -02 LOCATION: GRANDVIEW BUSINESS DISTRICT CONTRACTOR: PAYROLL EMPLOYER'S SHARE OF PERA CONTRACTUAL SERVICES: GREEN ACRES MINNESOTA VALLEY LANDSCAPE GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLISHING & SUPPLIES TOTAL COST �0 I fil, ASSESSABLE UNITS: r364,,4-3-ASSESSABLE SQUARE FEET ASSESSABLE COST: PROPOSED ASSESSMENT: GG J Page 3 7,848.67 351.62 1,293.51 1,902.70 1,843.66 250.00 13,490.16 FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLE MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENT NO. G -02 GRANDVIEW BUSINESS DISTRICT CITY OF EDINA, MN PID NAME 1 PROPERTY ADDRESS_ MAILING ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP SF X $.0292 28- 117 -21 -31 -0004 Holiday Station Stores, Inc. 5200 Interlachen Blvd. P O Box 1224 Minnea olis MN 55440 3,558 103.96 28- 117 -21 -31 -0007 Alice A. Anderson Etal. Trust 5101 Arcadia Av 8608 Lakeview Rd Bloomington MN 55438 3,872 113.13 28- 117 -21 -31 -0010 Albert Grazzini 5100 Eden Av 5100 Eden Av Edina MN 155436 35,199 1,028.46 28- 117 -21 -31 -0027 Frank M. Gaertner 5000 Vernon Av 246 S Albert St St. Paul MN 155105 5,287 154.48 28- 117 -21 -31 -0033 Tim Murphy 5100 Vernon Av 850 Bluebill Bay Rd Burnsville MN 155306 10,544 308.08 28- 117 -21 -31 -0043 Children's Heart Link 5075 Arcadia Av 5075 Arcadia Av Edina MN 155436 3,710 108.40 28- 117 -21 -31 -0046 McReavy Edina Properties 5000 Normandale Rd 2413 Silver La Minneapolis MN 55421 20,338 594.24 28- 117 -21 -31 -0064 Jerry's Enterprises Inc 5125 Vernon Av 5033 Vernon Av Edina MN 55436 116,512 3,404.29 28- 117 -21 -31 -0065 Jerry's Enterprises Inc 5017 Vernon Av 5033 Vernon Av Edina MN 55436 19,089 557.75 28- 117 -21 -31 -0067 CSM Investors Inc 5101 Gus Young La 2575 University Av #150 St. Paul MN 551141 25,300 739.23 28- 117 -21 -32 -0014 Norwest Bank 5116 Vernon Av Norwest Center 19th Floor, Minneapolis MN 554791 8,672 253.38 28- 117 -21 -33 -0004 Amoco Oil Co. 5209 Vernon Av 200 E Randolph Dr Chicago IL 606011 997 29.13 28- 117 -21 -33 -0017 Parkwood Knolls Construction 5301 Vernon Av 5307 Vernon Av Edina MN 55424 9,885 288.82 28- 117 -21 -34 -0002 Minnesota Wanner Co. 5145 Eden Av 5145 Eden Av Edina MN 55436 5,210 152.23 28- 117 -21 -34 -0004 Indep. School Dist. 273 - Bus Garage 5220 Eden Av 5701 Normandale Dr Edina MN 55435 19,005 555.30 28- 117 -21 -34 -0005 Inde . School Dist. 273 - Bus Garage 5150 Brookside Av 5701 Normandale Dr Edina MN 55435 7,380 215.63 28- 117 -21 -34 -0016 Su erAmerica 5205 Vernon Av 1240 W 98th St Bloomington MN 55431 2,740 80.06 28- 117 -21 -34 -0017 Jerrys Enterprises Inc 5101 Vernon Av S 5101 Vernon Av S Edina MN 55436 0 0.00 28- 117 -21 -34 -0024 Drs. Beecher & Rohde Partners 5203 Vernon Av 5203 Vernon Av Edina MN 55436 6,131 179.14 28- 117 -21 -34 -0025 Jerrys Enterprises Inc 5201 Vernon Av 5101 Vernon Av Edina MN 55436 2,320 67.79 28- 117 -21 -34 -0043 Library 5280 Grandview Square #201 4801 W. 50th Edina MN 55424 20,000 584.37 28- 117 -21 -34 -0043 Senior Center 5280 Grandview Square #101 4801 W. 50th Edina MN 55424 20,000 584.37 28- 117 -21 -34 -0040 Grandview Square Offices 5201 Eden Ave. 5201 Eden Ave. Edina MN 55436 115,952 3,387.93 461,701 13,490.16 Page 1 4924 PRANCE AVE E D I N A, M N 5 5 4 1 0 0 T E L:( 9 5 2) 9 2 8 - 0 3 2 3 RESTAURANTS To: City of Edina Re: Maintenance improvement # M -02 Parking Ramp Improvement # PA4 -02 From: Giorgio' Restaurant 4924 France Ave. Edina 55410 To the Edina City Council: Item II.A. & II.B. REGIONAL ITALIAN REs'I-AI'iz %..'. DISTINCTIVE F o o I) A N Il \\. ' AN I T A L I A N E S I' I. I: I I Dear Sirs: As a business and property owner I strongly oppose a proposed special assessment for both improvements'. I own restaurants in the city of Mpls, and my license fees needed to operate a business in edina is alniwsi three (3) time as much as in Mpls: why? I had to pay already a special assessment for the improvement dI,nc on the parking ramp last year, now I must pay an additional $ 6045.28 for the new proposals. I can not afford to pay what it looks like almost every year for "special" assessments. Again, I strongly oppose the improvements. S erely, i.o gio Cherubini I will not be able to attend the City Council meeting, as I have to work that night RECEIVED Engineering Dept. OCT 1 4 2002 City of Edina Minnesota o e Cn lass REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council FROM: John Keprios, Director Park &Recreation Dept. Date: October 11, 2002 Subject: Tree Removal Improvement Recommendation: Agenda Item # IUD Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Assess the total cost of $1,597.50 to the property owner at 4229 Country Club Road; $878.63 to the property owner at 4501 Wooddale Avenue, all for removal of a diseased elm tree. Info /Background: On each of the two properties listed above, a diseased elm tree and its stump were removed. The diseased elm tree was removed in accordance with City Code Section 1055, Control and Prevention of Shade Tree Diseases. Property owners were first given an opportunity to remove the diseased tree within a given period of time. If the tree is not removed within that period of time, the City contracts the removal of the diseased elm tree and assesses the property owner. This practice prevents the spread of Dutch Elm Disease. A three -year assessment period is proposed for all property improvements. To Council Action ® Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Assess the total cost of $1,597.50 to the property owner at 4229 Country Club Road; $878.63 to the property owner at 4501 Wooddale Avenue, all for removal of a diseased elm tree. Info /Background: On each of the two properties listed above, a diseased elm tree and its stump were removed. The diseased elm tree was removed in accordance with City Code Section 1055, Control and Prevention of Shade Tree Diseases. Property owners were first given an opportunity to remove the diseased tree within a given period of time. If the tree is not removed within that period of time, the City contracts the removal of the diseased elm tree and assesses the property owner. This practice prevents the spread of Dutch Elm Disease. A three -year assessment period is proposed for all property improvements. 2002 TREE ASSESSMENTS 4229 Country Club Rd. $1,597.50 (3 yr. Assessment) Edina, MN 55424 2. 4501 Wooddale Avenue $878.63 (3 yr. Assessment) Edina, MN 55424 A . l owe xu con .7a REPORURECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item II.E. From: VINCE COCKRIEL Consent ❑ PARK SUPERINTENDENT Information Only ❑ Date: OCTOBER 159 2002 Mgr. Recommends ® To HRA ❑ To Council Subject: WEED/MOWING IMP. NO. WM -02 ® Motion 5640 WOODDALE AVENUE ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion RECOMMENDATION: Approve assessments as proposed for Improvement No. WM -02. INFORMATIONBACKGROUND: Attached is an Analysis of Assessment for property located at 5640 Wooddale Avenue for weed/mowing on July 10, 2002. The Property ID # is 19- 028 -24 -24 -0065 in the amount of $75.00. i s � + 4 91'�1lr�� o e MEMORANDUM .ay .. CITY OF EDINA DATE: Friday, September 13, 2002 0 TO: Cari Fox, Assessing Department FROM: Vince Cockriel, Park Department SUBJECT: 2002 Weed Assessments Weed mowing at the property on, 5640 Wooddale Avenue on July 101h, 2002. Property ID # 19- 028 -24 -24 -0065 75.00 0 CITY Of EDINA 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 Phone: 92741861 INVOICE NO. INVOICE --M July 25, 2002 r Hallu Shavel SOLD Almaz Sewde SNIPPED TO 9201 Veuess Rd L Bloomington, MN 55438 OUR OROZIR NO. YOUR ORDEM UP. I T9RU6 BMIFPKD VIA F►D. OR COLI- ► QUANTITY 0 E 8 C R I !',T 1 0 N PRICE AMOUNT Weed moving on property, A.t _56�k(kz A&oAdAle. JLvA on July 10, 2002 Property. I.D. Please make chakk payablq—to'z- City of RO'Atka c/o Vince,.,-JCQckriel, Park &ujLt,.,, . . 4801 W. Ut1v St. Edina, MN__55,424 75.00 (If net amount is not paid,..,wtthjA&10 invoice date, said amount zj%.411 .1n. favor o f the City and Hennepin C o u u t y for a n t y,,_" tax:. Atpmxk, -*,A ch Rx-oRArM7 City of Edina ate of Letter) Dear Your local weed inspector has determined that the property described below has weeds and grasses that are in violation of either City.Ordinances or State of Minnesota Weed Laws. The City ordinances mention that grasses growing to a height of over ten inches need to be mowed. A period of 4 days from the effective date has been allowed for compliance to the weed notice. f the property owner should decide not to comply, the City will cut the weeds and enter the cost as a special assessment against the property. This cutting shall continue throughout the summer as many times as necessary to keep the weeds and grasses below ten (10) inches in height. If you have, since the receipt of this notice, either graded, cut, or taken care of the weeds in another manner, please disregard this notice. The City fees for mowing are: $ 75 per hour or a $ 75 minimum. Sincerely, � Dick Pelinka Assistant Weed Inspector (Address of Property) DO � (Lot) City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 ri (Block) (9 -0)-P- (PID #) (Subdivision) (952) 927 -8861 . FAX (952) 826 -0390 TDD (952) 826 -0379 �1 o e 0 Yo •-�h' less REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # II F FROM: John Keprios, Director Consent ❑ Park & Recreation Dept. Information Only ❑ Date: October 11, 2002 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: Aquatic Weeds Improvement Z To Council Special Assessment Action Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Adopt proposed special assessments for aquatic weed treatment of: 1. Minnehaha Creek Mill Pond. 2. Arrowhead Lake 3. Indianhead Lake Info /Background: Each year, the Arrowhead Lake and Indianhead Lake homeowners associations request the City to provide weed management and water treatment services for which are agreed to be paid by special assessment. Both Indianhead and Arrowhead Lakes are treated for aquatic weeds, and provided with aerators to further control aquatic weed growth and help oxygenate the water to avoid fish winter -kill. Additionally Indianhead Lake was treated with blue dye to add color to the lake water and retard algae growth. The proposed assessment per home for each of the 35 Arrowhead Lake residents is $242.38 and the proposed assessment per home for each of the 33 Indianhead Lake residents is 32 lots should be assessed at $364.94 per unit. The lot at 6409 Indian Hills Road should be assessed at 1/2 this rate ($182.47) with the City paying the other half of the unit rate ($182.47). This is the result of an agreement made between the homeowner, Rick Petersburg, Bob Perkins and Vince Cockriel. Residents whose properties abut the Mill Pond section of Minnehaha Creek ask the City to contract mechanical removal of aquatic vegetation in the Mill Pond area. The proposed special assessment for each of these 63 homes is $140.68. Vince Cockriel, Park Superintendent, administers all of the above aquatic weed management programs. MINNEHAHA CREEK MILL POND ASSESSMENT - 2002 Lake Weed Harvesting Weed Harvesting First Cutting Second Cutting Subtotal Less City Share TOTAL Assessable Units: Proposed Assessment $ °7,668.27 $ 2,694.45 $10,362.72 $ 1,500.00 $ 8,862.72 63 $ 140.68 per home . ARROWHEAD LAKE ASSESSMENT - 2002 Natural Reflections VII LLC Thin Ice Signs $ 447.30 Thin Ice Sign Installation $ 150.00 2002 Maintenance Contract $ 1,315.98 Subtotal $ 1,913.28 Midwest Aquacare Weed and Algae Control $ 4,870.00 Lake Dye Treatment $ 1,500.00 DNR Permit Fee $ 200.00 Subtotal $ 6,570.00 TOTAL $ 8,483.28 Assessable Units: 35 Proposed Assessment $ 242.38 per home INDIANHEAD LAKE ASSESSMENT - 2002 Natural Reflection VII LLC Thin Ice Signs $ 149.10 2002 Maintenance Contract $ 1,250.00 Subtotal $ 1,399.10 Midwest Aquacare Weed & Algae Control #1 Weed & Algae Control #2 Additional Algae Treatment Purple Loosestrife Control DNR Permit Fee Lake Dye Treatment $ 4,320.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 430.00 $ 260.00 $ 200.00 $ 1,434.00 Subtotal $10,644.00 TOTAL $12,043.10 Assessable Units: 33 Proposed Assessment $ 364.94 per home o e v � �y •'"�'ORPOR"�� �aae RE PO RT/RECO M M E N DATI O N To: Mayor and Council From: Craig Larsen, City Planner Date: October 15, 2002 Subject: Final Development Plan. D4 Grill & Chill, 7700 Normandale Boulevard Recommendation: Agenda Item # III. A. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ❑ Motion ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion The Planning Commission sends the proposal to the Council without recommendation. Info /Background: The Planning Commission made no recommendation because they were unable to reach a consensus on the proposed freestanding sign. Some wanted to accept the staff recommendation of a 20 -foot high sign with an area of 100 square feet, while others wanted to approve the sign as proposed. No one on the Commission objected to the proposed building or site plan. See attached Planning Commission minutes, staff report and plans. - « r � \ s ■2» 2z »< DRAFT MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 25, 2002 P-02 -4 Dairy Queen, Inc. 7700 Normandale Boulevard Request: Removal of existing restaurant building to construct DQ Grill & Chill Mr. Larsen informed the Commission Dairy Queen, Inc. has purchased the existing Embers Restaurant building and is requesting a final development plan to permit razing the existing building and constructing a new DQ Grill and Chill. Mr. Larsen said the plans submitted for development also include the DQ sign. Mr. Larsen stated the sign requires a variance and that can be granted at this hearing. Mr. Larsen concluded staff recommends Final Development Plan approval subject to watershed district permits. Continuing, Mr. Larsen added staff supports a height variance with the sign height not to exceed 20 feet and sign area not exceeding 100 square feet. Mr. Nick Sperides and John Russell were present representing the proponent, Dairy Queen, Inc. Commissioner Swenson asked Mr. Larsen if parking complies with ordinance standards. Mr. Larsen responded parking for the proposed restaurant complies with ordinance standards. Expanding Mr. Larsen reported the restaurant has a seating capacity of 114 and 11 employees working on the major shift, which create the need for 51 spaces, 53 are provided. Chairman Johnson said as he views the proposed signage he can understand why the Grill and Chill needs a sign over 8 feet in height. He pointed out this location is very unusual and traffic on Highway 100 would never see an 8 foot sign. Mr. Larsen agreed. He pointed out this site is unusual and the zoning of the subject site is different from the adjoining properties. He pointed out T.G.I. Fridays, and the Radisson Hotel are located in Bloomington and the service station located in Edina is zoned PCD-4, which is a different zoning than the subject site. Concluding, Mr. Larsen said that is the reason staff could support a sign height variance, and sign area up to 100 square feet. Commissioner Runyan questioned the height of the proposed sign in the photo submitted by the proponent. Mr. Sperides responded the height of the sign in the photo is 22 feet. Mr. Sperides said Dairy Queen has no problem with the 20 -foot height limit requested by staff. Mr. Sperides addressed the Commission and said Dairy Queen is very excited about the introduction to casual dining along with the traditional Dairy Queen "treats" usually identified with Dairy Queen. Continuing, Mr. Sperides said in his opinion what is proposed is a plus for the site. With regard to the sign Mr. Sperides explained the 3 pieces of the sign(area) are crucial to Dairy Queen. Mr. Sperides explained the proposed sign contains all the elements of the corporate image. Mr. Sperides reiterated Dairy Queen has no problem with the height limitation of 20 feet as recommended by staff. Commissioner McClelland said while she supports the Final Development Plan she has trouble supporting the sign as proposed. She said she could support the freestanding sign as stipulated by staff. She pointed out eliminating the reader board is a potential way to reduce the sign area to stay within the 100 square feet stipulated by staff. Mr. Sperides said he understands staff is supporting sign variances for the freestanding sign and appreciates the support, but explained if the sign area of the sign is limited to 100 square feet crucial elements of the Dairy Queen traditional sign will be compromised or eliminated. He pointed out when the sign is measured according to City standards much of the sign area is "air space ". He concluded the sign(s) is not a solid 145 square feet, and presented to the Commission a photo of how the proposed sign will look. Commissioner McClelland reiterated she supports staffs position. She stated in her opinion Dairy Queen is already "getting a deal" with regard to signage. Commissioner McClelland added, again that this is just her opinion that the reader board could go. Commissioner Byron commented it appears important to Dairy Queen that they retain all three elements of their signage and questioned the methodology behind eliminating the reader board. Commissioner Workinger asked Mr. Larsen if the signs located on the proposed new building complies with sign ordinance standards. Mr. Larsen responded all signs comply with standards except for the proposed freestanding sign. Mr. Larsen acknowledged a freestanding sign has always existed at this location but once a sign is removed it must be erected in compliance with present ordinance standards. Commissioner McClelland asked the representatives for Dairy Queen if Dairy Queen is planning on remodeling all DQ locations within the metro area. Mr. Sperides responded the goal is to renovate all locations. He explained this concept is just being introduced into this area and it is the goal of the corporate office to construct 12 new restaurants in this area over the next three years and remodel the existing 10. Mr. Sperides informed the Commission the corporate office for Dairy Queen is in Edina. 2 Commissioner McClelland added another concern she has is with traffic and if the traffic flow will be accommodated with the changes to this site. She said her concern is with the drive through and left turns. Mr. Larsen told the Commission the City Engineer, Wayne Houle has reviewed and approved the traffic plan as presented. Mr. Larsen said staff could have the Traffic Safety Committee review the plan if the Commission has reservations. Commissioner Runyan asked Mr. Larsen to clarify for him how staff calculates sign area. Mr. Larsen explained our ordinance stipulates that the smallest rectangle which can be made to circumscribe a sign panel which bears the letters, message, symbol, logo or figure. In this instance the smallest rectangle is wrapped around all three signs, which measured 145 square feet. Staff is supporting only 100 square feet. Mr. Larsen acknowledged our ordinance may be difficult to understand because many would measure the square footage of each sign and add them together, but our ordinance does not operate that way. Continuing, Mr. Larsen said when the existing pylon sign was removed that removal triggered compliance with the ordinance. Commissioner Brown asked if DQ is concerned with visibility from Highway 100 or the frontage road. Mr. Sperides said both. Commissioner Lonsbury noted on the proposal there is an outdoor seating area that seats 22 and asked Mr. Larsen if those 22 seats are reflected in the parking calculations. Mr. Larsen said City ordinance is silent on that point, and parking requirements are not increased to accommodate those spaces. He said a majority of City restaurants request out door seating during warmer months, and the City will review and approve out door seating if adequate space is provided. Continuing, Mr. Larsen pointed out the weather in Minnesota prohibits outdoor seating for the majority of the year and to date staff has not observed any issues with regard to outdoor seating at restaurant locations that provide this service during a limited time period. Commissioner Byron asked what the height of the building is. Mr. Sperides said the building height is 20 feet and if the parapet is included the height is around 22 feet. Commissioner Swenson moved to recommend Final Development Plan approval subject to watershed district permits - approval is also conditioned on referring traffic flow to the Traffic Safety Committee. Commissioner Swenson moved to recommend sign variance approval to allow a freestanding sign not to exceed 20 feet in height with a sign area of not more than 100 square feet. Commissioner Lonsbury seconded the motion. Commissioner Byron stated he couldn't support the motion as presented. He added he has no problem with the Final Development Plan but believes the 3 sign variances should be granted as presented by the proponent (20 foot height, 145 square feet). Commissioner Byron said in considering variances in his opinion one must look at the environment and in this instance the City would be hard pressed to find a site with similar constraints. He pointed out the site abuts the City of Bloomington, a major highway and frontage road and a PCD-4 service station. Commissioner Byron said and again, this is just his opinion, that the 45 square foot difference would not be noticed. He said eliminating one aspect of DQ Trademark (reader board) as suggested might not be a realistic request, and he is uncomfortable re- designing a sign. Chairman Johnson said the position the Commission should take in granting variances would be that the site is different and unique. Commissioner Byron said from the outset signage is unique and viewing signage creatively should be viewed as positive not negative. Commissioner Runyan commented when he looks at the proposed sign he doesn't feel it is too massive, there is a lot of "air space" included in the measurement. Mr. Larsen said he agrees there is a lot of "air space" when measuring this sign and staffs position is that this site is unique which is why staff supports a 100 square foot sign area and a height variance. Concluding, Mr. Larsen said the final outcome is up to the Commission and Council. He reiterated staff does agree this is a unique site and hardships exist with regard to signage. Commissioner McClelland pointed out the site is zoned PCD -2, which prohibits signs exceeding 8 feet in height. The staff has recommended that a height variance be granted recognizing a hardship. Commissioner McClelland pointed out what DQ is requesting is beyond staffs' recommendation. Continuing, Commissioner McClelland said in her opinion Highway 100 isn't a unique enough situation to support such a large sign area variance. She stated she is worried other commercial properties may request similar variances. Concluding, Commissioner McClelland said she doesn't think the message board is essential, and if it were removed the sign would meet with staffs recommendation. Commissioner Workinger questioned if the message board will be backlit. Mr. Sperides said the board is backlit only where there is text. Chairman Johnson called for the vote on Commissioner Swenson's motion to recommend Final Development Plan and sign variance approval subject to staff conditions. Ayes; Lonsbury, Swenson, McClelland. Nays; Byron, Runyan, Workinger, Brown and Johnson. Motion failed 3 -5. 4 Commissioner Byron moved to recommend Final Development Plan approval subject to staff conditions and to recommend sign variance approval subject to the plans presented. Commissioner Runyan seconded the motion. Commissioner Brown said there appears to be confusion on the sign variances. Commission Runyan agreed, he added most of the confusion is focused around the sign area variance and the way our sign code reads. Commissioner Losbury agreed the sign code may be interpreted differently, but in his opinion that is a different conversation. Commissioner Lonsbury said the focus of the Commission at this time appears to be either recommending approval or denial of a Final Development Plan with sign variances. Commissioner Lonsbury asked for guidance from the Chair, noting the Zoning Board usually hears variances, and questioning if the thought process is different at the Commission level. Chairman Johnson said in his opinion the thought process with regard to variances is the same for both the Zoning Board and Commission. He said first staff determines that a variance is needed. When that is determined he said he looks at if there is a unique reason why a site can't be held to ordinance standards. Continuing, Chairman Johnson said his views may differ from some Commissioner's but in his opinion variances are not necessarily a bad thing, and each situation must be viewed individually. He said in this situation enforcing a sign height of 8 feet is a hardship, pointing out in this location it would be like not having a sign. He added he appreciates the difficulty the 45 square feet presents to some Commissioners. , Commissioner McClelland said in her opinion this is not the place to change anything (sign ordinance) and the Zoning Board should hear this (sign variance) not the Commission. Mr. Larsen interjected and said it is not unusual to have the Commission and Council hear variance requests and not the zoning board. He pointed out all Commissioner's sit on the Zoning Board and have heard at different times at the Commission level variance requests from developer's of subdivisions, final development plans, conditional use permits, etc. A lengthy discussion ensued between Commission Members with regard to the requested sign variances. Commission Members appeared split in their discussion. All Commissioners supported Final Development Plan approval and a sign height variance, but the proposed sign area variance divided the Commission. Chairman Johnson called for a vote on Commissioner Byron's motion to recommend Final Development Plan approval and approval of the freestanding sign as presented. Ayes; Byron, Workinger, Runyan, Johnson. Nays; Lonsbury, Swenson, McClelland, Brown. Motion failed. 5 Chairman Johnson clarified for the Council the way he interprets the proceedings is the Commission recommends approval of the Final Development Plan for the site and building but has no recommendation with regard to signage. M City of Edina Planning Commission Meeting September 25, 2002, 7:30 PM Case Number: P-02 -4 Edina City Hall Council Chambers 4801 West 50th Street Applicant: Dairy Queen 7505 Metro Boulevard Edina, MN 55439 Location: 7700 Normandale Boulevard Edina, MN 55439 Zoning: PCD -2, Planned Commercial District Comprehensive Plan Designation: Commercial Request: Final Development Plan approval to allow removal of existing building and construction of a new restaurant. Proposal: Dairy Queen proposes to raze the existing building and construct a new, 4,213 square foot restaurant called DQ Grill and Chill. The restaurant would have seating for 114 and would have a drive through located on the south side of the building. Zoning Compliance: The proposed plan complies with all Zoning Ordinance requirements. Signage: See attached memo from Joyce Repya. Recommendation: The proposed use complies with the Comprehensive Plan, and all improvements proposed meet Zoning Ordinance standards. The only issue is the size and height of the proposed freestanding sign. In 1992 the maximum height for a freestanding sign in the PCD -2 District was reduced from 20 feet to 8 feet. Since that change most businesses have elected to reface their non - conforming 20 -foot high signs to avoid complying with the new requirement. In staffs opinion an 8- foot sign in this context would look out of place and would be ineffective. Staff would recommend a variance to allow a 20 -foot high sign with a sign area not exceeding 100 square feet. Approval should be conditioned on necessary watershed district permits. MEMORANDUM TO: Craig Larsen FROM: Joyce Repya SUBJECT: Sign Proposal — 7700 Normandale Road DATE: September 25, 2002 The subject property, currently a Pannekoeken Embers is zoned PCD -2, Planned Commercial District. Edina Sign Ordinance No. 460 allows for a monument sign no larger than 80 square feet in area and no taller than eight feet in the PCD -2 district. The existing freestanding sign on the site is non - conforming, standing 20 feet tall and measuring 100 square feet in area. The subject signage proposal for "DQ Chill & Grill" includes a 145 square foot, 22 foot high freestanding sign. The proponent has indicated a sign area of 101.3 square feet, arrived at by adding together the rectangular area of the three sign elements. The largest freestanding sign allowed by Edina's sign code is 100 square feet and 20 feet high in the PCD -3 zoning district. The Edina Sign Ordinance defines sign area as the smallest rectangle which can be made to circumscribe the letters, message, symbol or logo. Using that definition, the total sign area of the three sign elements is 145 square feet. The proposed sign height of 22 feet is two feet taller than the most generous height of 20 feet which is allowed in the PCD -3 and 4 zoning districts. It appears that the proposed sign could be lowered to 20 feet, thus not exceeding the tallest signs allowed in Edina. /45 51. fit. Alksua-- go s8 $ ft. hi PYLON SIGN 1µ•M1' -r (PROFILF) = 55.10 (RECTANGULAR) = 46.1* zz /ol. 3 st ft .%L . 0 .hyh WELMAN DAIRY QUEE -- = _- SPERIDES ARCHITECTS PYLON 51" DI a L L C SM xoRMAMAM IAIM BLVD svrr8 93s BLOOM rvroN. MN 55437 FAX (932) 9969663 PHOM (932) 9969662 ►.' &' L1 PRD.WT DIRECTORY ARG MT. FB.MAN DES ARC+VWT5 ADDRESS. MOD NOW NICALE LAKE WALUARD sm cm OMSTATEMP. BLOOMNSTOK M455487 RLOWE 452- 496.9662 PAX. 452- 996,9665 COMAM NICK SPERIDE E-MAIL- N5PEIWErAMJ4MARONGOM EN6LNEEt CPU). DU6NM A SWATS ADDRESS, 9200 NOWA4IDALE BOLLEVARD 9117E 500 CITYSTATEMP. BLOOMNSTOL4 MN 0457 PLOPS: 452- 620 -1400 1" • 952 - 920-7760 CONTACT. WEAL MAIKIOI.A E -MALL.. NEALWAMNRAMA56c.4ATESO0M ENSRMEt (CMu VAN 9.41E ALLEN 4 ASS= Mc. ADDRESS. 2495 )EUIM LANE NO SLATE 10 CITYSTATZMA PLYMMM MN 55441 PdMB 7693774132 PAK. 76SIZ44023 CONTACT, ANMOW PINT E-MAIL APMIOVA SIG EALLEILOM 1ACIINITY MAP RIDUSTRIAL BLVD Trnr SHECT sere Q N C4 S %MT INDEX n Trnr SHECT 7OMNS DISTRICT c mpIGATE OF SIRVLY C4 6RADINS, MMNA6- 4 EROSION CONTROL PLAN c2 UITL11Y PLAN CS DETAILS U LANDSCAPE PLAN Al ARLIITEG7URAL SITE PLAN A2 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AS EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 19 PHOTOMETRIC, PLAN WNIN6 IWORMATION- CITY OF EDINA TOTAL SITE AREA 43NM SP W004A) 7OMNS DISTRICT Pm 2 FAX LFLOOR AREA RATIO) 19 OF TRACT FLOOR AREA (f001PRIR) 4= SP PARKINS RFdJDr® 06OPMATS.IPIRS470NSOIFILSW PARKINS PROVIDED A SPACB ~MAPPED STALLS PROVIDED 2 AC.56= I VAR AC +COL R TOTAL PARKINS PROVE 54 SPACES LANDWAPM REMBRE EM5 SELL 9JOMM SET6Y+CS FRONT YARD 95'4' SIDE YARD a'4' RM YARD a'4� STAfpN6 F'OR DRIVE TIID R1WRED 4 CARS (97067 PER DRIVE TMW BAY III if g� 0 P, 02 � D" yliM° Ian -A of V �F Z J V JU W �< w L J _r Q We v-I HEET IO. �p ° TI t(T�� Z mn 00 n EMPER & ASSOCIATES INC. LAND SURVEYING • ENGINEERING 721 OLD HIGHWAY B N.W. NEW BRIGHTON. MINNESOTA 55112 651 -631 -0351 FAX 651 -531 -8805 ZO POD (AS FRO SIDI IN TI REA • 0 BUL MA) 7700 NORMANDALE ROAD CITY OF EDINA, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA (SEE LEGAL DESCRIPTION BELOW) STATEMENT OF ENCROACHMENTS AQ BUILDING ENCROACHES A MAXIMUM OF 23.62 FEET OVER THE SIDE SETBACK LINE QB BUILDING ENCROACHES A MAXIMUM OF 3.17 FEET OVER THE FRONT SETBACK LINE © BUILDING ENCROACHES A MAXIMUM OF 4.30 FEET OVER THE FRONT SETBACK LINE CERTIFICATE aziee Icnencwc) oa m0D rnO1 OF SURVEY FLOOD ZONE SUBJECT PROPERTY UES WITHIN FLOOD ZONE 'C" (AREAS OF MINIMAL FLOODING) ACCORDING TO THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP COMMUNITY PANEL NUMBER 270160-0006 B. DATED MAY 1. 1980 El DLCTRIC TAAr6O11A9 cv® w VA —0 rOaWOC ..o1nt oe auAO rosr n Pw —9— LNTW'/ Yr1ER —sr— arm rivrn -u[— utOHaww ntcrwc — Wmlaovo rOmMO[ — uTU �Aw —c— csluu TOTAL 53 NOTE: PER EDINA BUILDING DEPARTMENT. THE FEDERAL STANDARD FOR HANDICAP PARKING IS 'I HANDICAP STALL PER 50 PARKING SPACES- PARKING REQUIREMENTS SPACES EQUAL IN NUMBER TO ONE -THIRD THE MAXIMUM SEATING CAPACITY. PLUS ONE SPACE FOR EACH EMPLOYEE ON THE MAJOR SHIFT. (PER CITY OF EDINA PARKING AND CIRCULATION ZONING CODES - 850.08) ENTRANCE TO 7700 NORMANDALE ROAD REAR OF 7700 NORMANDALE ROAD NOTE UTILITIES SHOWN AS PER FIELD MEASUREMENTS OF ABOVE GROUND FEATURES AND AVNLABLE UTILITY PLANS ALL UTILITY LOCATIONS TO BE VERIFIED THROUGH OWNER STATE ONE -CALL PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION OR CONSTRUCTION. IXXISTCAlg1 i xo®r mlrn THAT nn mlllcr, nAIA 41 AtPWIT �w9 MmAIEp n 1[ a I AM YY WQR mw+WSO1 AIN MAT A 0.ly uRN9I W NIR[>S 1A mmslln lam TNL uWS V >K VAR v wa[mrA YARI 0. Imi0. 0.f rN� uTm nq _ ar Ir mot *tw.. I n e IV Q . I q. i I N ; NOTES 1. ALL EXISTING INFORMATION TAKEN FROM SURVEY BY KEMPER & ASSOCIATES INC. DATED SEPTEMBER S. 2002. 2. SUBSURFACE GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION BY [REPORT][PROIECT] DATED . 3. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS INCLUDING LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES. AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION. 4• CONTRACTOR TO PREVENT DIRT AND /OR DEBRIS FROM ENTERING STORM SEWER OR BEING TRANSPORTED OFF -SITE IN AN UNCONTROLLED MANNER. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY AT PROJECT CLOSEOUT THAT STORM SEWER SYSTEM IS CLEAR OF SEDIMENT AND /OR DEBRIS AND IS FULLY FUNCTIONAL S. ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION WHICH ARE OUTSIDE THE LIMITS OF PAVING ARE TO BE RESTORED AND REVEGITATED. 6. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE TEMPORARY GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AT ALL CONSTRUCTION ACCESS LOCATIONS. SEE DETAIL 7/C3. 7. ALL EROSION CONTROL ELEMENTS ARE TEMPORARY. CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL EROSION CONTROL ELEMENTS PRIOR 70 START OF LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES. MAINTAIN IN GOOD CONDITION DURING CONSTRUCTION AND REMOVE FROM THE SITE UPON COMPLETION OF FINAL PAVING AND TURF ESTABLISHMENT. B. CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL SILT FENCE OR STRAWBALES AROUND ALL EXISTING CATCHBASINS AND MANHOLES PRIOR TO THE START OF LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES AND AROUND ALL NEW CATCHBASINS AND MANHOLES AFTER THEY ARE INSTALLED. SEE DETAILS 2/C3 AND 4/C3. 9. ALL UTILITY DEMOU 10N AND /OR ABANDONMENT TO BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY OF EDINA AND STATE OF MINNESOTA REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS. 10. EXISTING UTILITIES ARE SHOWN IN THEIR APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH MAY INCLUDE BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO: ELECTRIC. TELEPHONE, GAS. CABLE N, COMPUTER CABLE; FIBER OPTIC CABLE. SANITARY SEWER. STORM SEWER AND WATERMAIN. CONTRACTOR TO CONTACT GOPHER ONE -CALL BEFORE EXCAVATING. 11. ALL EXISTING UTILITIES AND OTHER IMPROVEMENTS ARE TO REMAIN UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 12. CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT FROM DAMAGE ALL EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS, LANDSCAPING, STRUCTURES AND UTILITIES THAT ARE TO REMAIN. CONTRACTOR TO REPAIR ANY DAMAGE AT OWN EXPENSE. 13. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THE EXACT LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING STORM AND SANITARY SEWER PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. 14. SEE ARCHITECTURAL FOR DIMENSIONED SITE LAYOUT, FENCING, STRIPING AND LANDSCAPING. SEE ELECTRICAL FOR SITE UGHTING. 15. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE TEMPORARY SEED AND MULCH ON ALL NON -PAVED AREAS WITHIN 7 DAYS AFTER ROUGH GRADING IS COMPLETED. SEED WITH ANNUAL RYE SEED AT 60 LOS PER ACRE AND WOOD MULCH FIBER AT 45 LBS PER 1,000 SF. 16. PROVIDE PERMANENT SEEDING AND FERTILIZING OF ALL DISTURBED AREAS OUTSIDE THE LIMITS OF PAVING PER MNDOT SPECIFICATION SECTION 3876 MIX NUMBER 6511 PROVIDE MULCH PER MNDOT SPECIFICATION SECTION 3BB2 TYPE X. 17. PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM COVER OVER THE TOP OF PIPE AS FOLLOWS: A S' OVER WATERMAIN B. 5' OVER SANITARY SEWER C. V OVER STORM SEWER 18. ALL WORK TO CONFORM WITH CITY OF EDINA AND STATE OF MINNESOTA STANDARDS AND REGULATIONS. 19. ALL EXCAVATIONS MUST COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF OSHA 29 CFR, PART 1926, SUBPART P 'EXCAVATIONS AND TRENCHES'. THIS DOCUMENT STATES THAT EXCAVATION SAFETY IS THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. ND PROPERTY LINE 827 EXISTING CONTOUR LINE x 827.58 EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION CB® EXISTING STORM SEWER CATCH BASIN STMH O EXISTING STORM SEWER MANHOLE FH<> EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT WV® EXISTING WATER VALVE LPO EXISTING LIGHT POLE ET EXISTING ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER GVO EXISTING GAS VALVE TMHO EXISTING TELEPHONE MANHOLE GPO EXISTING GUARD POST 1`1 EXISTING SIGN SS EXISTING SANITARY SEWER ST- EXISTING STORM SEWER UE EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL LINE UT EXISTING UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE W EXISTING WATERMAIN G EXISTING GAS MAIN A29 PROPOSED CONTOUR PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION 4F— DRAINAGE ARROW Q PROPOSED MANHOLE ® PROPOSED CATCHBASIN SILT FENCE \ STRAWBALES AT MANHOLE /CATCHBASIN \ .... ao aw a safes /{ nn MV C;Y ti IYI - STOM1I IN NORTH (!5 /�11GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN C1 o zo' 40• 60' �J' GXT IY,pY fCYE , Y AS,q Tr N H WUA JKMiiE Q 07 19110 W WF-��v JQo,= YU —ga°X 00 9S u Z Q ems`§ O i ®� I An.l.co., cw vSS. nax nc . mxx APPROXIMATE LOG WATER SFIMCE TO i I aJrsa smP m I a "� ¢P B FI�NrnH cRAOE " /Ja C COORDINAM -,WITH NEW OF EXITING APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF EXISTING REMAIN. FISTING PILE SUPPORTED SANITARY TO REMAIN. REMAIN. PROTECT FROM PROTECT FROM OAMAM CONNECT TO TOP FLUSH WITH NEW BUILDING SANITARY. CONTRACTOR CONNECT TO NEW TO FIELD VERIFY EXACT LOCATION AND CONTRACTOR TO FIELD INVENT AND COORDINATE WITH NEW TION AND DEPTH AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION. REPORT STORM SEWER PIPE CONFLICTS TO ENGINEER. INSTALLATION. REPORT PPE CONFUCS �a aa:cuw — �l —nsa .cc— — — — — — — — cIT b o } �r v Tm \ k ,j I � I a• ar.a &�c.../I �scrrrcc g� 0 v _F r ^ to � G � I Vel 0 eA can pV s>v aza) CB B ° ra-_ RM 820.3 C B A INV 022.12 � REMOWE gs' r S+a• CB C 7r{T• *.� RIM 8255.x, INV 82250 • I .—TU co ez.i6 dV v nY. ary [ BI9� N 1. ALL EXISTING INFORMATION TAM FROM SURVEY B7 TENDER 3 ASSOCIATES NC. RATED SEPTEMBER & 2002 2 SUBSURFACE GEOTEC LAICAL INVESRGTXIN NT [REPOR7)[PROJECTJ MATED & CONTRACTOR 70 FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS 24C MM LAOA71016 OF EXISTING UTILITIES. AND NON•Y ENGINEER OF ANY OWUPANM PRIOR TO STARING CONSTRUCTION. 4. CONTRACOR TO PREVENT DIRT Nr0 /OR DEBW FROM ENT NG STOFI M SEWER OR BEND TRANSPORTED OFF —STTE N AN UNCONTROLLED MW ML COWWTOR TO VERIFY AT PROJECT CLOSEOUT THAT STOW SEMEN SYSTEM 6 CLEAR OF SEDIMENT AND/OR DEBRIS AND 6 FULLY FUNCIDWLL. • ALL AREAS DISTURBED E CONSTRUCTION WHICH ARE OENEOEA THE UMI S OF PAVING ARE TO BE RESTORED AND • ALL ERG" CONTROL ELEMENTS ARE TEMPORARY. CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL EROSION CONTROL ELEMENTS PRIOR TO START OF LAND DISTURE1 O AMA IM IWMAIN IN GOOD CONDITION DURING OINSIRULTION AND REMOVE FROM THE SITE UPON COMPLETION OF FINAL PAVING AND TURF ESTABLISHMENT. 7. CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL SILT FENCE OR STRAWBW.ES AROUND ALL EXISTING G7CEASI S AND MANHOLES PRIOR TO THE START OF LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES AND AROUND ALL NEW G7C BASKS AND MANHOLES AFTER THEY ARE INSIAILED. SEE DETAILS 2/C3 AND 4/C& & ALL UTILITY DEMOLITION AND /OR /BWiDOWFM TO BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CRY OF EDINA AND STATE OF MINNESOTA fEORATIG S AND STANDARDS. 9. DOSING UBJ11ES ARE SHOWN IN THEIR APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATION OF ALL DOSING UNITIES WHICH MAY INCLUDE BUT IS NOT LIMITED 70' . ELECROC. TELEPHONE GAS. CABLE TV, COMPUTER CABLE FIBER OPTIC CAJOLE. SANITARY SEWERL STORY EWER AND WAOERMAK CONTRACTOR TO WNTALT GOPHER ONE -CALL BEFORE EXCAVATOR. 10. ALL EXISTING UTILITIES AND OTHER BPROVDIENIS ARE to REMAIN UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE 11. CONTRACTOR 70 PROTECT FROM DAMAGE ALL EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS. LANOSGIPIR. SIRUCIURES AND UTILITIES THAT ARE TO REMAIN. CONTRACTOR TO REPAIR ANY DAMAGE AT OWN EXPENSE . MAIN �� e .zss) n a e¢w an szzw P IW CURB1, iTORMCEPTOR MH E T}RAN6�ITIO.N"�' - -DES 1200 + RIM 11241.7 INV 521.73 1 I _10-I —q — lam PROPOSED BUI DM + i F FFE B2a0o . F 7700 N17?IM.ANDAILE ROAD SING_E ST 7Y RE,TA +RAN' ..::, — n­-m.se �cs� AT" wC ce \e�� ersze s :xv c alas .w we NORTH ® /I1UTILITY AND PAVING PLAN a , •.2D 0 20' 40' RIO' 12. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERFY THE EXACT LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING STORM AND SANITARY SEWER PRIOR 70 THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. 1S SEE ARCHITECTURAL FOR 009300M SITE LAYOUT. 9� N1tiiNafST AND LANDSCAPING. SEE ELECTRICAL FOR 14. CONTRACTOR 70 PROVIDE TE PORMY SEED AND MULCH ON ALL NON—PAVED AREAS WITHIN 7 MAYS AFTER ROLXRL MOM 6 COM FL M. SEED WITH ANNUAL RYE S® AT 00 LOS PER ACRE AND WOOD MULCH FIBER AT 45 L&4 PER 1.000 Mr. 1& PROVIDE PERWINENE SEEDING AND FERIL2M OF ALL DISTURBED MFRS OUTSIDE THE LIMITS OF PAVING PER MNDOT SPECIFICATION SECTION 3878 MIX NUMBER BSA PP1ROVDL E MULCH PER MNDOT SPECIFICATION SECTION 3882 TYPE IL PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM COVER OVER THE Top OF PPE AS FOLLOWS: A W OVER WATERYNN B. W OVER SANITARY SEWER C. 1' OVER STOW SEWER 17. ALL WOK TO CONFORM WITH CITY OF EOM AND STATE OF MINNESOTA STMDARRS AND REGULATIONS IL SANITARY SEWER PPE AND FITTINGS TO BE POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC). SDR 35 MINIMUM AND COLDLY WTIN ASIA D3034. JOINTS TO BE SOLVENT CEMENT OR FLEXIBLE MGTERIIOR. It STORM SEINER PPE TO BE REINFORCED CONCRETE PPE ( RCP). ASTM 070. LASS [1.2.3.4.51 WITH OADMED 20. WATERYAOi 70 E DUCME DION PPE (OP), AND A -21.51. 150 PSI WORKING PRESSURE MNIUWL 21. ALL EWAVATIC S MUST COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF OSHA 29 CFR. FART 192& SUBPART P 'DUVAT06 AND TRENCHES'. THIS DOCULELR STATES THAT DIAVATION SAFETY 6 THE SOLE RESPONSKEIIY OF THE CONTRCMR M saw si C 44 n P e asuAMTI ve:nlwT leap resc_ j` :r ?v'ry\ . n � au azen av c -v nu \ a � Q, NQ PROPERTY LIE CH ® EXSBRi STORM SETTER CATCH Sam STMH O EXISTING SIGN SEINER MANHOLE A-H,(> EXISTING FIE HHYDRAIT V ve EXISTING WATER VALVE LPO} EXISTING LIGHT POLE E i E WN0 ELECTRIC TRANSFORId R GHQ EXISTING GALS VALVE TMH EXISTING TELEPHONE MANHOLE GPO EXISTING GUARD POST L EXISTING SIGN SS EXISTING SANIEARY SEWER ST EXISTING STORM SEWER UE EX IS11N0 UNDERGROUND E=nW AL 1E uT EXISTING UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE 'a EXISTING WATERLIAN .. EXISTING GAR MAN Q PROPOSED MANHOLE ® PROPOSED CATCIIBASI N zw000c=� PROPOSED SVWTMY SEWER PROPOSED STONY SEINER �w - PROPOSED WATER SERVICE W Z IR 3 Qc u c W wQ� F) wul -0 993 ieeM� �S3Ii 2 WE<n 3 =taT� AE Inn, y >i J V D- - Z Z L 1 /1l ✓u d F J `11121a G2 11 INSTALLATION. REPORT PPE CONFUCS �a aa:cuw — �l —nsa .cc— — — — — — — — cIT b o } �r v Tm \ k ,j I � I a• ar.a &�c.../I �scrrrcc g� 0 v _F r ^ to � G � I Vel 0 eA can pV s>v aza) CB B ° ra-_ RM 820.3 C B A INV 022.12 � REMOWE gs' r S+a• CB C 7r{T• *.� RIM 8255.x, INV 82250 • I .—TU co ez.i6 dV v nY. ary [ BI9� N 1. ALL EXISTING INFORMATION TAM FROM SURVEY B7 TENDER 3 ASSOCIATES NC. RATED SEPTEMBER & 2002 2 SUBSURFACE GEOTEC LAICAL INVESRGTXIN NT [REPOR7)[PROJECTJ MATED & CONTRACTOR 70 FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS 24C MM LAOA71016 OF EXISTING UTILITIES. AND NON•Y ENGINEER OF ANY OWUPANM PRIOR TO STARING CONSTRUCTION. 4. CONTRACOR TO PREVENT DIRT Nr0 /OR DEBW FROM ENT NG STOFI M SEWER OR BEND TRANSPORTED OFF —STTE N AN UNCONTROLLED MW ML COWWTOR TO VERIFY AT PROJECT CLOSEOUT THAT STOW SEMEN SYSTEM 6 CLEAR OF SEDIMENT AND/OR DEBRIS AND 6 FULLY FUNCIDWLL. • ALL AREAS DISTURBED E CONSTRUCTION WHICH ARE OENEOEA THE UMI S OF PAVING ARE TO BE RESTORED AND • ALL ERG" CONTROL ELEMENTS ARE TEMPORARY. CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL EROSION CONTROL ELEMENTS PRIOR TO START OF LAND DISTURE1 O AMA IM IWMAIN IN GOOD CONDITION DURING OINSIRULTION AND REMOVE FROM THE SITE UPON COMPLETION OF FINAL PAVING AND TURF ESTABLISHMENT. 7. CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL SILT FENCE OR STRAWBW.ES AROUND ALL EXISTING G7CEASI S AND MANHOLES PRIOR TO THE START OF LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES AND AROUND ALL NEW G7C BASKS AND MANHOLES AFTER THEY ARE INSIAILED. SEE DETAILS 2/C3 AND 4/C& & ALL UTILITY DEMOLITION AND /OR /BWiDOWFM TO BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CRY OF EDINA AND STATE OF MINNESOTA fEORATIG S AND STANDARDS. 9. DOSING UBJ11ES ARE SHOWN IN THEIR APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATION OF ALL DOSING UNITIES WHICH MAY INCLUDE BUT IS NOT LIMITED 70' . ELECROC. TELEPHONE GAS. CABLE TV, COMPUTER CABLE FIBER OPTIC CAJOLE. SANITARY SEWERL STORY EWER AND WAOERMAK CONTRACTOR TO WNTALT GOPHER ONE -CALL BEFORE EXCAVATOR. 10. ALL EXISTING UTILITIES AND OTHER BPROVDIENIS ARE to REMAIN UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE 11. CONTRACTOR 70 PROTECT FROM DAMAGE ALL EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS. LANOSGIPIR. SIRUCIURES AND UTILITIES THAT ARE TO REMAIN. CONTRACTOR TO REPAIR ANY DAMAGE AT OWN EXPENSE . MAIN �� e .zss) n a e¢w an szzw P IW CURB1, iTORMCEPTOR MH E T}RAN6�ITIO.N"�' - -DES 1200 + RIM 11241.7 INV 521.73 1 I _10-I —q — lam PROPOSED BUI DM + i F FFE B2a0o . F 7700 N17?IM.ANDAILE ROAD SING_E ST 7Y RE,TA +RAN' ..::, — n­-m.se �cs� AT" wC ce \e�� ersze s :xv c alas .w we NORTH ® /I1UTILITY AND PAVING PLAN a , •.2D 0 20' 40' RIO' 12. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERFY THE EXACT LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING STORM AND SANITARY SEWER PRIOR 70 THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. 1S SEE ARCHITECTURAL FOR 009300M SITE LAYOUT. 9� N1tiiNafST AND LANDSCAPING. SEE ELECTRICAL FOR 14. CONTRACTOR 70 PROVIDE TE PORMY SEED AND MULCH ON ALL NON—PAVED AREAS WITHIN 7 MAYS AFTER ROLXRL MOM 6 COM FL M. SEED WITH ANNUAL RYE S® AT 00 LOS PER ACRE AND WOOD MULCH FIBER AT 45 L&4 PER 1.000 Mr. 1& PROVIDE PERWINENE SEEDING AND FERIL2M OF ALL DISTURBED MFRS OUTSIDE THE LIMITS OF PAVING PER MNDOT SPECIFICATION SECTION 3878 MIX NUMBER BSA PP1ROVDL E MULCH PER MNDOT SPECIFICATION SECTION 3882 TYPE IL PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM COVER OVER THE Top OF PPE AS FOLLOWS: A W OVER WATERYNN B. W OVER SANITARY SEWER C. 1' OVER STOW SEWER 17. ALL WOK TO CONFORM WITH CITY OF EOM AND STATE OF MINNESOTA STMDARRS AND REGULATIONS IL SANITARY SEWER PPE AND FITTINGS TO BE POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC). SDR 35 MINIMUM AND COLDLY WTIN ASIA D3034. JOINTS TO BE SOLVENT CEMENT OR FLEXIBLE MGTERIIOR. It STORM SEINER PPE TO BE REINFORCED CONCRETE PPE ( RCP). ASTM 070. LASS [1.2.3.4.51 WITH OADMED 20. WATERYAOi 70 E DUCME DION PPE (OP), AND A -21.51. 150 PSI WORKING PRESSURE MNIUWL 21. ALL EWAVATIC S MUST COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF OSHA 29 CFR. FART 192& SUBPART P 'DUVAT06 AND TRENCHES'. THIS DOCULELR STATES THAT DIAVATION SAFETY 6 THE SOLE RESPONSKEIIY OF THE CONTRCMR M saw si C 44 n P e asuAMTI ve:nlwT leap resc_ j` :r ?v'ry\ . n � au azen av c -v nu \ a � Q, NQ PROPERTY LIE CH ® EXSBRi STORM SETTER CATCH Sam STMH O EXISTING SIGN SEINER MANHOLE A-H,(> EXISTING FIE HHYDRAIT V ve EXISTING WATER VALVE LPO} EXISTING LIGHT POLE E i E WN0 ELECTRIC TRANSFORId R GHQ EXISTING GALS VALVE TMH EXISTING TELEPHONE MANHOLE GPO EXISTING GUARD POST L EXISTING SIGN SS EXISTING SANIEARY SEWER ST EXISTING STORM SEWER UE EX IS11N0 UNDERGROUND E=nW AL 1E uT EXISTING UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE 'a EXISTING WATERLIAN .. EXISTING GAR MAN Q PROPOSED MANHOLE ® PROPOSED CATCIIBASI N zw000c=� PROPOSED SVWTMY SEWER PROPOSED STONY SEINER �w - PROPOSED WATER SERVICE W Z IR 3 Qc u c W wQ� F) wul -0 993 ieeM� �S3Ii 2 WE<n 3 =taT� AE Inn, y >i J V D- - Z Z L 1 /1l ✓u d F J `11121a G2 11 co ez.i6 dV v nY. ary [ BI9� N 1. ALL EXISTING INFORMATION TAM FROM SURVEY B7 TENDER 3 ASSOCIATES NC. RATED SEPTEMBER & 2002 2 SUBSURFACE GEOTEC LAICAL INVESRGTXIN NT [REPOR7)[PROJECTJ MATED & CONTRACTOR 70 FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS 24C MM LAOA71016 OF EXISTING UTILITIES. AND NON•Y ENGINEER OF ANY OWUPANM PRIOR TO STARING CONSTRUCTION. 4. CONTRACOR TO PREVENT DIRT Nr0 /OR DEBW FROM ENT NG STOFI M SEWER OR BEND TRANSPORTED OFF —STTE N AN UNCONTROLLED MW ML COWWTOR TO VERIFY AT PROJECT CLOSEOUT THAT STOW SEMEN SYSTEM 6 CLEAR OF SEDIMENT AND/OR DEBRIS AND 6 FULLY FUNCIDWLL. • ALL AREAS DISTURBED E CONSTRUCTION WHICH ARE OENEOEA THE UMI S OF PAVING ARE TO BE RESTORED AND • ALL ERG" CONTROL ELEMENTS ARE TEMPORARY. CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL EROSION CONTROL ELEMENTS PRIOR TO START OF LAND DISTURE1 O AMA IM IWMAIN IN GOOD CONDITION DURING OINSIRULTION AND REMOVE FROM THE SITE UPON COMPLETION OF FINAL PAVING AND TURF ESTABLISHMENT. 7. CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL SILT FENCE OR STRAWBW.ES AROUND ALL EXISTING G7CEASI S AND MANHOLES PRIOR TO THE START OF LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES AND AROUND ALL NEW G7C BASKS AND MANHOLES AFTER THEY ARE INSIAILED. SEE DETAILS 2/C3 AND 4/C& & ALL UTILITY DEMOLITION AND /OR /BWiDOWFM TO BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CRY OF EDINA AND STATE OF MINNESOTA fEORATIG S AND STANDARDS. 9. DOSING UBJ11ES ARE SHOWN IN THEIR APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATION OF ALL DOSING UNITIES WHICH MAY INCLUDE BUT IS NOT LIMITED 70' . ELECROC. TELEPHONE GAS. CABLE TV, COMPUTER CABLE FIBER OPTIC CAJOLE. SANITARY SEWERL STORY EWER AND WAOERMAK CONTRACTOR TO WNTALT GOPHER ONE -CALL BEFORE EXCAVATOR. 10. ALL EXISTING UTILITIES AND OTHER BPROVDIENIS ARE to REMAIN UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE 11. CONTRACTOR 70 PROTECT FROM DAMAGE ALL EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS. LANOSGIPIR. SIRUCIURES AND UTILITIES THAT ARE TO REMAIN. CONTRACTOR TO REPAIR ANY DAMAGE AT OWN EXPENSE . MAIN �� e .zss) n a e¢w an szzw P IW CURB1, iTORMCEPTOR MH E T}RAN6�ITIO.N"�' - -DES 1200 + RIM 11241.7 INV 521.73 1 I _10-I —q — lam PROPOSED BUI DM + i F FFE B2a0o . F 7700 N17?IM.ANDAILE ROAD SING_E ST 7Y RE,TA +RAN' ..::, — n­-m.se �cs� AT" wC ce \e�� ersze s :xv c alas .w we NORTH ® /I1UTILITY AND PAVING PLAN a , •.2D 0 20' 40' RIO' 12. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERFY THE EXACT LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING STORM AND SANITARY SEWER PRIOR 70 THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. 1S SEE ARCHITECTURAL FOR 009300M SITE LAYOUT. 9� N1tiiNafST AND LANDSCAPING. SEE ELECTRICAL FOR 14. CONTRACTOR 70 PROVIDE TE PORMY SEED AND MULCH ON ALL NON—PAVED AREAS WITHIN 7 MAYS AFTER ROLXRL MOM 6 COM FL M. SEED WITH ANNUAL RYE S® AT 00 LOS PER ACRE AND WOOD MULCH FIBER AT 45 L&4 PER 1.000 Mr. 1& PROVIDE PERWINENE SEEDING AND FERIL2M OF ALL DISTURBED MFRS OUTSIDE THE LIMITS OF PAVING PER MNDOT SPECIFICATION SECTION 3878 MIX NUMBER BSA PP1ROVDL E MULCH PER MNDOT SPECIFICATION SECTION 3882 TYPE IL PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM COVER OVER THE Top OF PPE AS FOLLOWS: A W OVER WATERYNN B. W OVER SANITARY SEWER C. 1' OVER STOW SEWER 17. ALL WOK TO CONFORM WITH CITY OF EOM AND STATE OF MINNESOTA STMDARRS AND REGULATIONS IL SANITARY SEWER PPE AND FITTINGS TO BE POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC). SDR 35 MINIMUM AND COLDLY WTIN ASIA D3034. JOINTS TO BE SOLVENT CEMENT OR FLEXIBLE MGTERIIOR. It STORM SEINER PPE TO BE REINFORCED CONCRETE PPE ( RCP). ASTM 070. LASS [1.2.3.4.51 WITH OADMED 20. WATERYAOi 70 E DUCME DION PPE (OP), AND A -21.51. 150 PSI WORKING PRESSURE MNIUWL 21. ALL EWAVATIC S MUST COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF OSHA 29 CFR. FART 192& SUBPART P 'DUVAT06 AND TRENCHES'. THIS DOCULELR STATES THAT DIAVATION SAFETY 6 THE SOLE RESPONSKEIIY OF THE CONTRCMR M saw si C 44 n P e asuAMTI ve:nlwT leap resc_ j` :r ?v'ry\ . n � au azen av c -v nu \ a � Q, NQ PROPERTY LIE CH ® EXSBRi STORM SETTER CATCH Sam STMH O EXISTING SIGN SEINER MANHOLE A-H,(> EXISTING FIE HHYDRAIT V ve EXISTING WATER VALVE LPO} EXISTING LIGHT POLE E i E WN0 ELECTRIC TRANSFORId R GHQ EXISTING GALS VALVE TMH EXISTING TELEPHONE MANHOLE GPO EXISTING GUARD POST L EXISTING SIGN SS EXISTING SANIEARY SEWER ST EXISTING STORM SEWER UE EX IS11N0 UNDERGROUND E=nW AL 1E uT EXISTING UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE 'a EXISTING WATERLIAN .. EXISTING GAR MAN Q PROPOSED MANHOLE ® PROPOSED CATCIIBASI N zw000c=� PROPOSED SVWTMY SEWER PROPOSED STONY SEINER �w - PROPOSED WATER SERVICE W Z IR 3 Qc u c W wQ� F) wul -0 993 ieeM� �S3Ii 2 WE<n 3 =taT� AE Inn, y >i J V D- - Z Z L 1 /1l ✓u d F J `11121a G2 11 W Z IR 3 Qc u c W wQ� F) wul -0 993 ieeM� �S3Ii 2 WE<n 3 =taT� AE Inn, y >i J V D- - Z Z L 1 /1l ✓u d F J `11121a G2 11 • ��. HAVING AN AREA OF NOT LESS ASTING TO BE FLUSH H GRADE AT PAVED LANDSCAPED AREAS STONE FILTER WIRE ABOVE FINISH GRADE 1/2' SORE OPENINGS � CM UNITS GRATE TYPE NEENAH REMARKS .B•C R-2571 -A ADJUSTING RINGS AS 6' -0' STAKED A ENTRENCHED STRAW BALE (2-STAKES FILTER FABRIC OVERFLOW QUIRED (2 -MIN, 4 -MAX.) PER BALL) RUNOFF WATER LL BED OF MORTAR STRAW�6 36' WOVEN WITH SEDIMENT :::: FILTERED WATER D R- 3250 -A CURB INLET WEEN. RINGS - MORTAR COMPACTED SOIL TO 0 BINDING WIRE WIRE FENCE EXISTING TSIDE OF RINGS PREVENT PIPING PAVEMENT �W' R- 1642 -A MH COVER 2' ADJUSTING RINGS AS REQUIRED. OR TWINE i STEEL POST IIII �pO� NAR ED OF ° MORTAR BETWEEN NGSB MORTAR 27• OUTSIDE OF RINGS NHOLE FRAME k CATCH BASIN IIII SEDIMENT LADEN (OR WOOD) O c VER -SEE SCHEDULE 10 /W GRATE (OR I I� RUN -OFF 6'- 0'O.C. RECAST CONCRETE CATCH o - BASIN PER ASTM C478 ,1 LOPE GROUT 1' /FT. H MA CHINED BEARING MH COVER) RUN-0_DROP INLET PICK RFACES AND 2 CONCEALED I I FLOW GRADE 1YITH GRATE OLES OR APPROVED m TOWARD DRAM PIPE as i m� • AL 3 I I NOTE IF STONE FILTER - EE PLAN FOR PIPE C3 I I BECOMES CLOGGED WITH SIZE AND INVERT WATER FLOW F SEDIMENT, REMOVE STONE, PRECAST CONCRETE OPENING v 4 MANHOLE PER AMU C478 CLEAN AND REPLACE. _ _ EXISTING PRECAST EXISTING 12' TEPS - NEENAH R -198DE SEDIMENT FILTER CONCRETE STORM PIPE c RESTRICTOR (DOWNSTREAM) U.N.O. ALUMINUM O 18.O.C. �1STRAWBALES CB f MH �STRAWBALE BARRIER ­),SILT FENCE DETAIL s AT EXISTING PAVEMENT NO SCALE rc B�EIWBEEN�. SEC�IOI•!5 C3 NO SCALE (,`3 NO SCALE C3 NO SCALE (`,3 NO SCALE a I SHALL HAVE -0- RING SEE PLAN FOR PIPE Y SLOPE 2' PER FOOT 8' PRECAST OR C.LP. BASE STANDARD SEWER MANHOLE C3 NOTES: NO SCALE 1 - MANHOLES 8' OR DEEPER - THE PRECAST SECTION IMMEDIATELY BELOW THE CONCRETE SECTION SHALL BE 1' -0' HIGH. 2. PROVIDE STEPS IN MANHOLES OVER 4' -0' IN DEPTH. 3. REINFORCING SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF A SINGLE LINE WARE FABRIC HAVING AN AREA OF NOT LESS THAN 0.12 S0. IN. PER FOOT OF HEIGHT. 4. PROVIDE SNAP -IN BOOT AT ALL SANITARY SEWER CONNECTIONS TO MANHOLES io1SHALLOW CATCH BASIN C3 NOTES: 1. REINFORCING SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF A SINGLE NO SCALE CASTING SCHEDULE HAVING AN AREA OF NOT LESS CATCH BASIN /MANHOLE GRATE TYPE NEENAH REMARKS .B•C R-2571 -A AREA DRAIN D R- 3250 -A CURB INLET E R- 1642 -A MH COVER io1SHALLOW CATCH BASIN C3 NOTES: 1. REINFORCING SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF A SINGLE NO SCALE CATCH BASIN GRATE & FRAME HAVING AN AREA OF NOT LESS (SEE SCHEDULE) WITH MACHINED BEARING SURFACES ✓k TWO CONCEALED PICK HOLES, 6' DIAMETER PVC PIPE OR APPROVED EQUAL ° ADJUST CASTING FLUSH WITH FINISHED GRADE 6• DIAMETER PVC PIPE, 2' ADJUSTING RINGS AS REQUIRED. 0 ED OF WELD TO PIPE 1/2' MORTAR BETWEEN NGSB MORTAR 27• OUTSIDE OF RINGS EXISTING PIPE RECAST CONCRETE CATCH o - BASIN PER ASTM C478 ,1 LOPE GROUT 1' /FT. 5' DIAMETER HOLE CUT TOWARD DRAM PIPE as i m� • OUT OF CENTER - EE PLAN FOR PIPE 5' DIAMETER SIZE AND INVERT io1SHALLOW CATCH BASIN C3 NOTES: 1. REINFORCING SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF A SINGLE NO SCALE LINE WIRE FABRIC HAVING AN AREA OF NOT LESS THAN 0.12 SO. IN. PER FOOT OF HEIGHT. CONCRETE FILL AROUND 6' DIAMETER PVC PIPE ° TO FILL IN 12' PIPE 6• DIAMETER PVC PIPE, 0 5' -0' LONG, SET INTO WELD TO PIPE 1/2' EXISTING PIPE THICK PVC, PLATE WITH 5' DIAMETER HOLE CUT OUT OF CENTER 5' DIAMETER WATER FLOW OPENING v 4 _ _ EXISTING PRECAST EXISTING 12' CONCRETE CB CONCRETE STORM PIPE 12 SECTION @ RESTRICTOR C3 NO SCALE WALK WIDTH PER P ! ON- REINFORCED 1 /4'/FT. SLOPE CONCRETE WALK q COMPACTED GRANULAR BASE COMPACTED SUBGRADE SUBGRADE SECTION r/// 1/4'R 1 /4'R TYPICAL S TYPICAL a JOINT ° ' FILLER FULL D 3 /8•MINIMUM OF WALK CONTRACTION JOINT EXPANSION JOINT AT 5' O.C. MAXIMUM AT 60' O.C. MAXIMUM 6 CONCRETE WALK & JOINT DETAILS C3 NO SCALE 3' R-k 42' I /1/2' R PAVING AND *.1 RI AGGREGATE BASE, SEE ? /C? FOR SLOPE PER THICKNESS GRADING PLAN •O. 1 CONCRETE )) CURB & GUTTER (13612) C3 NO SCA�E GRAVEL 7 CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE C3 NO SCALE IrBITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE MNDOT 2331, TYPE 41 BITUMINOUS BINDER COURSE MNDOT 2331, TYPE 31 ........ .. BITUMINOUS TACK COAT COMPACTED CLASS 5 PER MNDOT 2357 ...'.BASE (1005 CRUSHED).;.;.:.: :.•.: MNDOT r' COMPACTED SUBGRADE '1 PER SOILS REPORT BITUMINOUS 1PAVEMENT DETAI C3 NO SCALE 7' UNREINFORCED PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE SUB 6' COMPACTED CUSS 5 BASE (1005 CRUSHED) MNDOT 3138 I COMPACTED SUBGRADE PER SOIL REPORT 9 CONCR T PAVEMENT NOTES: PROVIDE CONTRACTION JOINTS AT NO SCALE 10' D.C. MAX. _ JOINT SEALANT DETAIL : '4:e NOTES: DOWELS 8. OR LESS PAVEMENT THICKNESS 3/4' DLA. . -.a. N -a. - -O ° EITHER ONE PIECE OR 4': 16' LANG ON 12' CENTERS (TYP) / THREADED SPLIT-TYPE DOWELS 8' TO 11' PAVEMENT THICKNESS 1• DIA �b DOWEL MAY BE USED 16' LONG ON 12' CENTERS (TIP) ~ DOWELS 12' TO 15' PAVEMENT THICKNESS 1 1/4' PAINT AND OIL - DIAL 20' LONG ON 15' CENTERS (TYP) ONE END OF p;,a DOWELS 16' TO 18' OR LESS PAVEMENT THICKNESS DOWEL a 1 1/2' DLA20' LONG ON 18' CENTERS (GYP) D DENOTES DOWEL DIAMETER SEE JOINT SEALANT JOINT SEALANT NOTE 2 DETAIL DETAIL EDGE OF � a. .. e4 -.' -: 'o:' -. - STRUCTURE a 4'° . a: v v • e:: °:a + °= 9- ~ POURED JOINT P•.�o v� SEALANT 3/4' PREMOLDED y S a . ° W WIDTH OF SEALANT EXPAN ION MATERIAL - -v RESERVOIR 1/2' MINIMUM n p v 'a . '� 5/8' MAXIMUM EXCEPT FOR ..' ° -• ° 3/4' EXPANSION JOINTS /S' RATING D - DEPTH OF SEALANT 'a .Q ° TAPE SEE NOTE 1 1.0 TO 1.5 TIMES W 5' MINIMUM T - DEPTH OF INITIAL SAWCUT, 114 OF THE SLAB THICKNESS FOR THICKENED EDGE EXPANSION CONTRACTION SEE W PAVEMENT LESS THAN 12' NOTE 2 JOINT AT STRUCTURE NO SCALE NO SCALE - - POURED JOINT SEALANT 4 • - .4 '. ' 4 :: ' "4 . • .. . -. 4 .. a. - , -� 'a' . -4. BACKER MATERIAL T/4 +I SEE NOTE 1 1/2' WIRE SPACING PAVEMENT JOINT OR 3' MAX OR EDGE _ NOTES: 1. SEPARATING TAPE OR BACKER MATERIAL REQUIRED TO ! ° _ p .4 4 • 9 - , • a' -_'. i :a. PREVENT JOINT SEALANT FROM FLOWING INTO SAWCUT, TO 6' TO B' PAVEMENT 6 X 6 W2.9 X W2.9 B' TO SEPARATE NONCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS AND TO PREVENT 10 PAVEMENT 6 X 6-W4.0 X W4.0 11' TO 12' SEALANT FROM BONDING TO BOTTOM OF RESERVOIR. PAVEMENT 4 X 4 X W2.9 X W2.9 13' TO 2. TOP OF SEALANT WILL BE 1/8 IN. TO 1/4 IN. BELOW 15' PAVEMENT 4 X 4 W4 X W4 TOP OF PAVEMENT. 1REINFORCED SLAB DETAIL NO SCALE JOINT SEALANT DETAILS NO SCALE r )3 CONCRETE JOINT DETAILS C3 U wZA QW u W I- JQo.- YU -�� oom za I 3 a cd It t ` Eh % fil �1 _ d111 3a I ,n Z w U _z z u p J V J Z ? v LL 4L NORTH z Z tu scEr No. � Z N m p � o N H101w -. ' mom n LANDSCAPE PLAN LI SCALE, V a 20'-0' 6@BiAL Mom PLANT SCHEDULE SYM Ott r"m SIZE COMMON NAM'_ LATIN NAFE SUA 5 ACCENT B 1/2' SUMMIT ASH FRA%INB FEWSYLVANICA lUHMIr IMH I PRIMARY 4 I/2' HOPGYL.00UST INVIMAL 6LEDITSIA TLK.AXTHOS D13MS'66GOLE' 005 6 C- 01IMIMENTARY V MGN COLORADO BUR SPRIZE PICEA PURIM CRIS S ORNAFIENTAL 2' CRAB. SPRING SNOW KALM SPRING SHOOT FW 2 SHRUB s caff MARA AMM MAID SLI°e A05t 6IlNLA T LAW AVT 24 SHRUB 95 WNT TFCHNY ARBDR VITAE TWA OCGIDBRALIS 'TECFNY' AHNS 47 1 SHRUB 143 CONTI ANTMONY m YSM SPIEA SPUTA WONV A ANTHONY WATERER AM STRAP S- bNATNG GABU DOUBLE STRAW M 6A NRES AT 120' SPACING PR13'ARE ATBJA MM R007BALL NDTB ST KINS TREES 15 OPTIONAL HHOle4M THE CONTRACTOR a RESPOIBLiP I= THE MAWAIOe - N A PUIB POSITION TMtOUSHOU1 THE 6UARAW@ P!RWD. �1 TREE INSTALLATION LI VECOVOUIS TREE BALLED AW BURLAPPW LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS 944.45' PERIMETER DIVIDED BY 40= 23.7= 24 OVERSTORY TREES REQUIRED EXI5TIN6 TREES ONE 12' ASH - EXCHAN&E FOR 4 COMPLIMENTARY TYVO 8' ASH - EXCHANGE FOR 3 PRIMARY ONE 18' LINDEN - EXCHANSE FOR 4 COMPLIMENTARY n SHRUB INSTALLATION LI DECIDUOUS OR CONIFEROIS SHRUB BALLED AND BURLAPFW OR CONTAINER bROM C MLCH 3GAP4 E3 1 SOIL 1. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO Ve°n ALL UTILITY LOCATIONS ON PROMBW RITH TIE GENERAL CONTRACTM AID BY CALLING BOR®L STATE ONE CALL PRIOR TO STARING PUNT LOCATIONS. 2. ALL PUNT MATERIAL SHALL CA7Lr NTH THE LATEST ®PION OF THE AMOUCAN STANDARD POR KWAW STOOK ANEW ASWVATION OF KRSBtYMIX 3. CONTRACTOR a RE#G18E11j' MR C*WN6 MADITEWI GE OF ALL MSLY INSTALLED MATERIALS UNTIL TIE OF OP16t AWEPTAWAL ANY ACTS OP VANDALISM OR DAMAGE NXN MAY OCOR PRIOR TO WNER ACCEPTANCE SMALL BE THE RESPO WLLTY OP THE CONTRACTOR. 4. ND PRAM MAT m smr% we mu a Awanm PITart APPROVAL err TE LANDSCAPE ARCRIIC.T 5, PROVIDE PARK GRADE TREES 6. t ARC R6 M I AT IP OWOGATOR PLAN SHALL BE S METED W 7. FIARRANTY POR LANDSCAPE MAT9OAL9 SHALL WIN ON TIE DATE OP ACCEPTANCE BY THE LANDSCAPE MPCWTPLT. 8. 601 R TOR SHALL WARAMB.' NIX PLANT MAT3TIAL TROWN ONE CAIHDAR YEAR FROM THE DATE OF ONEII ACCUTAWE 14TH ALL REftACET81T5 TO BE PROVIDED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OFIER. 4. A LAMMAPING INSPWYION FEE SWILL BE PAID TO TIE CITY AT THE T6E A MWIN6 OR OR9t FEW IS EST® FOR DORIC TO M DOZE ON THE SAME PROPERTY AS THE L.AN DSLAPIM WORK AND AS A C 0RM TO THE WIANCE OP THE FBtMlT. Q I In a III 8 l 3 § ' � 3 e�Yg� W� r Z .V V Z Z v Z J 0- W 0- V N Q z LI O It Q z O z O x z 7 O 9 wa Rom UPI EXCHANGE REaAr:® NEW TRMS PROVIDED 5% ORNAMENTAL 12 1 O 1 3 SPRINO Siam CRAB Ws COMPLIMENTARY M.4 M 6 6 6 COLORADO SHOE 20% ACCENT 46 5 0 5 5 SUMMIT ASH t 2 AM1R MAPLE ION PRIMARY 14 3 3 O 9A RL. 12 1 O I I HOIEyLOczST n SHRUB INSTALLATION LI DECIDUOUS OR CONIFEROIS SHRUB BALLED AND BURLAPFW OR CONTAINER bROM C MLCH 3GAP4 E3 1 SOIL 1. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO Ve°n ALL UTILITY LOCATIONS ON PROMBW RITH TIE GENERAL CONTRACTM AID BY CALLING BOR®L STATE ONE CALL PRIOR TO STARING PUNT LOCATIONS. 2. ALL PUNT MATERIAL SHALL CA7Lr NTH THE LATEST ®PION OF THE AMOUCAN STANDARD POR KWAW STOOK ANEW ASWVATION OF KRSBtYMIX 3. CONTRACTOR a RE#G18E11j' MR C*WN6 MADITEWI GE OF ALL MSLY INSTALLED MATERIALS UNTIL TIE OF OP16t AWEPTAWAL ANY ACTS OP VANDALISM OR DAMAGE NXN MAY OCOR PRIOR TO WNER ACCEPTANCE SMALL BE THE RESPO WLLTY OP THE CONTRACTOR. 4. ND PRAM MAT m smr% we mu a Awanm PITart APPROVAL err TE LANDSCAPE ARCRIIC.T 5, PROVIDE PARK GRADE TREES 6. t ARC R6 M I AT IP OWOGATOR PLAN SHALL BE S METED W 7. FIARRANTY POR LANDSCAPE MAT9OAL9 SHALL WIN ON TIE DATE OP ACCEPTANCE BY THE LANDSCAPE MPCWTPLT. 8. 601 R TOR SHALL WARAMB.' NIX PLANT MAT3TIAL TROWN ONE CAIHDAR YEAR FROM THE DATE OF ONEII ACCUTAWE 14TH ALL REftACET81T5 TO BE PROVIDED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OFIER. 4. A LAMMAPING INSPWYION FEE SWILL BE PAID TO TIE CITY AT THE T6E A MWIN6 OR OR9t FEW IS EST® FOR DORIC TO M DOZE ON THE SAME PROPERTY AS THE L.AN DSLAPIM WORK AND AS A C 0RM TO THE WIANCE OP THE FBtMlT. Q I In a III 8 l 3 § ' � 3 e�Yg� W� r Z .V V Z Z v Z J 0- W 0- V N Q z LI O It Q z O z O x z 7 O 9 I; SITE P SCALE, I' e SITS PUN NOM O PARKINS, LOT STRIPINS GOLOR TO BE M& MY WHITE' OR "SAFETY YELLOW, HANDICAPPED STALL PICTOGRAM COLOR PM LOCAL. GORE O1 D ORATIVE WTTAL MWZ O GONGRM CMM 15 6' W DE AND 0' DEEP STRAIGHT PROFILE WIN 6' EXPOSED ABOVE PARKN6 S RACE O4 ALGESSIBLE PARKINS 516106E ® DEGORATNE PATIO U&MNS © TRASH STORAGE (D PARKINS LOT L16MT POLE LANDSCAPE AREA O9 BIKE RACK n 4 � 11 It if hill s�psE g36 $g fsg y�88 ' F7<M, O ` � O CT a , CLIP s (L M a �C z v � i � 2 O J r J T, NORTH 10 6 11A1i 1p11N � fY Pplffl�IW �10 il[ qNl (BI OMOB) ,SHEET N0. 16 ; AlZ O] N L NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4' - 1' -0' EXMMOR MZVATION NOTES OSMMTEOsfm 9pum mwm am W, §rfM Ll ST01&M#EM M WM STAM N MUMS SU GAPS • MM OPX19WMMA= W51 MW4MM 14NUVCnIM M-W fa Z% MS ANARl1O MM not 540 F® .E "a O(EMMG TW SIFR.M =Am meffim FELo -43.23 STTL6 N721 m usn 5701' MM AHU 6MM 7MPB' M4 5" OGAP RASIM OVBWWM MM-M OWT, (DIAL WA4", 746► NllL SOON TAN PIM Kr"SOD OMM PAOS.a WWAGIIWSL AUVW 5104LE% NAFa1M PROAX:m NL cam FRSiMM RED OMM PMM 5N4LHt, NFFOMI PIIOOIL7A OC GAM NMl4AD,]4 SA AWLOIAM POM K"M Sao OMTAL PANS. amm NNGISI NDDIX:79. 41G GAM WWI","MMM AWL "M AIM SAM O MM PANT, amm of: M PRA7CT'J, m GOIOR, NAWAT" MW OPAM CAM, M4NFALTNM ASW CAM" MB HAM GOASMW RID Galan, ozm ow R® RIME. P SO. mm TNT. am SATOI mm MSD AL JMM OPRM RAM MANPALTLRM KNOW GAOR PM%4W GLLAR ANOO AM FOM SATM d.AMI& GLFM WJU 09"TW ROME STOW FRME CUM O VMVJF- IWI p" OSUGP,rAIMAlVMMAUHWSATs FM OWRFW1W1 OP wn+ FAMW TM FRW1s MA PWOR TO PA90'ATlall a' R1Me ON sm S� BM cam NFDRIE OMCCOO Ma " AT MM STOR4Np117, PWVM FOR SM MlIWM AT M&M RAE 04000 YE N50 IWALLHI Qo exTeL�oR LISNT PIXTSIlE SB HJS; OR BILL OSM MYR - SM MTAU comapm 4'X4 M" STARM STS ORX Loan L FRAM: PASO 7"W" E"S01!*M EA5T ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4' - 1' -0' n x 61JSg ,5 f a I s lz w 0 v � i} Q ul < Avri J Z %X< -s1EET No. A2 ° Z 00 i x REST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4' - V-O' VCMOR MZVAYM NOM O9MMATED swm 9PPLml. Hamm woo Na Sr"A La STM!- TEM43M M=M STALK w ►uar�ois 9tL w5 • rae OW15U R M91AT10N M1915YSW MM PMM~nl M Mf-Wr OMM Qs AIMRn.O MM MOSS SAIDP ,"a OcavMC 7m SrM. M MAML 004095M Pd00.4321s 5Tn8 WOR"m usm ow LALR. APPLG MOM WM' M4 SHAM Ow PLASIOS, ORMOM t ffm mwr. OMM WWCIAD, 24 6A Mint SMA TAN PSl0i6 KYNAR 000 W& Fmau MANPAOMM AU-" SIMMt. I WOW PRDVM1 1 NO GAUL P009%M Rm OPETAL I-Nau SJREM NMOM PRODIGm m LOMLR. WA-CA", 24 M AM BALK MA KYNM SOO • MU& PAME SLPPLOST. w aw PROMM 7%, W. LO m wlMfJ.AD."MOD® Am FNM UAW SAM OPETAL PATE.. MAMEWCRI®M. AVOW SIPPLEM w!• VM PROD 75, NO c4wm MARAnm am O PAIM c Pr ANO. MANPAGU M A51W CAMP" STYLE MUM GOASILM Pus (IMAM 12720 vw RED PRAIb 1' SQ ALW Tla f1LAR SATM PN91 ►ED ML JOMIS o"MM^tAm PAMPAOnM M KAPO M LALtM PSMIA4 -W CAM ANOD MJM AEw SAM GLAZM =AR MW M9LATm PROMO! 94Pm PRW OOV®M • VMVISI KI PRAM OS L OA' 2' a M AMMOD MUOW SATIN PMI91 o=Vz-7 11 Mmm vm" mw% 93 "im PRIOR TO MMM AT Ml OP PRAMS MEN (SM mArh OM sm am DOLOR. ME04M OOLOCANS &M SM AT RADMS STpMMRONT). PROV AM SM M71MMS AT BRANS PLANL fIOMMAIR w STEM Ot3TAUbt OO OnBOOR EMIT FMTAM 22 am OR OC ^O— SAT! - SM DUALS Otwat EiNlm. 4104' ANKA STARMSS 57EL OMM DOOR 1 rRNM PANT TITIMPAH PAMLS 1,.A.5 WE FWM 5OUTH ELEVATION SCALE. 1/4' - P-O" 9 d 5 a jl i :1 3 a- 6 phf lia` of z w 0 v � W W _� DL a W � � z � lu NOFITM -9HF'r iS. AQ A3Z ms0 i SITE F 5GALE: V - U bw ba ba ba ba ba bs bs ba ba ba ba 3a US ba ba ba ba ba oa bA UP ba bs bs U4 bs bw U U U U — -- -- -- -- — -- -- -- -- -- 3e 3s L U 1s l0 br, U U ' s +y 3w 3+ U U U U U U U U U U bo bw ks is U 3i 'oa 316 to 3s L L L 3w to bo 3a L U U 3s bs 3R 3L U U U 3. $A 3s %U U L+ 'u 10 %A to �!w 1s art ba bu 34 1s L U U L 32 34 1w 31 b U U 32 3a ILI 30 U U U 3a 3w 3s 3o U L+ 3o 3w 3a u \ \ 'v is bw U'L 30 U U U 3J 32 32 30 U b U 3J 3a 'ha 3o U L+ U 31 32 3L 30 U L+ 30 3/ 3s 3a Lp II U L U U U L U U U L 1s a U U U is U U U U U U U U U U U L U 1s U U U U U U 1 A – to U I I OA + 00 b t� C 4 U U 3a t. L+ %A U iA L, U U U U U 3w is U 3s 1 + bi I I ppq.p I bpi b� \ b+ 10 Lip U \ b+ l�+ 50 U us ba U br bs bs 3s I. to 30 3w 3s 3w 1" \ U U U 3e 3a os ow %AM, 7r OVETIALL P"UM"O NOMTT. • u • b� b� bi � b► LI bi bs ba 3s , 3s to 3s -1n – Ta bs U be lu ba bs bs La U 3., bw . 3a U bs u bu b, its 3s U bs bw bs ba IM �112 bs U4 bs U 3w iLS lb, U U bs b! fr 1s 10 1� U— 1 iF- --b., � 0A 0. L� L� ♦r bs' Jbs of of 1� ♦ b– JbR bs �a or– br br bo ba bw ar U b)r �bs ow ba LIGHTING $ BUILDING SIGNA&E POWER PLAN �� ®��• E[il/HJ 6YM LOCATION MAMJPAGTURM GATAL06 NUM. MMW TOTAL • OP LAMPS REMARK-+ WATTS AND TYPE' PAKNS LOT mem.. NT KW0A0400M-V M SWAM M "7, "b Mw" Lf AW u6T N %m ON ART %AM, 7r OVETIALL P"UM"O NOMTT. mm Opp" EE DANXICOM Sam= NOTPO L16NT 79=*= AM STOC= t AVAILML! PM "WIATE DSlV FROM VILLA L16MTTN6 UPPLY n10.' 1716 S. VMmCVENTM / ST. LOUIS. MO / 691W- 6 1-0004k25-0,69. ATTCTON RILN IQ.W! (OLT. 1061 OR DAVE UMSTAM61 OCT. 176) FOR NATIONAL ACCOLNT PM&M 4 DISTRUSRIOPL • I,RIN6 METNOD9 FOR ALL MOWED LIOItT PLXTLFM SNALL EE COMWM J-EWO P•TPt FLEX DROPS MM ARTCLO 410, 670 590 WO. ETC. 70= NEC. • FLXTLRM t VAP000 E=TRJCAL DEV1Ca, SMLL BE MTALLM M MLIM PCM MR SELF SLPPMTIN6 WnWM (OPPOSITE CCWMS OF 7 X 4 P9XTLWM TO BE SUPPORTED MEPENO MY PTMI MOm FROM ROOP 6TMZrA J. 7007 NSO. - YMPY MM4 LOCK 60VMMNS OFRCIAL M LOCATIONS OR ADOTON9 CF BTt6E11CY L161MNY. i'll e� i A Ira im o0 a @�a g i. A .21 of 7 d 1 .Z ju V V W A 1 O O 0 ul J J ~ Z NORTH 'SHEET NO. ,% co I O 40T 2 O Q C c c 51-51/21, PYLON SIGN 1/4' ■1'-O' WELMAN SPERIDES ARCHITECTS L L C 8MNORMANDAMIAMMD svrrE 955 MADMONGUICK.MN 55437 PAX (952) 9969663 PHMM cm 996.9662 PROJECT NAbM- DAIRY QUEEN- EDINA PYLON SIGN DETAIL �m 9.16-2 ZMAW,« PYLAW MIIIIIIIII II 00- r6dp-Ol9!,lw'P p0 Not frIte! 4m -Allb —"%m I ommmdo.. LOAM i6mrzmrm- Pr v powwow- 6 tip' ` reap 0 chill all li'l ��iiA11 11111.. LI ._ w wp I�low — i MOM IN :0V r_xw w M , I I I I I o N �m =owl ■ WN. n IN C CIA MR 0 iii Sim �o� =� �o t o ._ r o o NEW- INS �� � o � i `�l��f� I ° o 0 0�l?'�i ° �� o o �o ii i ii i ii o a o o � � �) I 'f) i ■� �■ o 0 0 R PJA MOM W OA40 Plikof ■ m 0 L4 I It � CO3 p I I In. D DAIRY CU MN L060 (ILLUMj W- i'x3' -3' (NOMNAL) r�0 Q2�C`G�0 �' 32' S16N BOX (ILLUMJ 30' X Y2' READER BD. (ILLUMj PYLON 516N 0 0 ---------------------- - ---------------------- 0 I I� 0 "BIG BOX' GROSS = 150.1 50. FT. SOFT. MCTAN&LAIV ■ 4614 I I SO.". OtWTAN&A -W ■29.64 I I SQFT. (REGTAN6ULA1� ■ 25A4 RECTANGULAR &Ross = 101.3 50. FT. SQPT. (PROFILE) ■ 33.1. rSOFT. OOROFILFJ ■ 24.0. 1 SO.FT. 0 ROFILW ■ 2454 PROFILE GROSS ■ 86.6 50. FT. v v V . , v lfw)l lu a H� O�• r-4 Le l �y REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor and Council From: Craig Larsen, City Planner Date: October 15, 2002 Subject: Request to Amend Conservation Restriction 6608 Indian Hills Road Recommendation: Agenda Item # III. B. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ ° Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ° ® To Council Action N ❑ Motion Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Grant request to locate new home in Conservation Restriction area as depicted in attached site plan. Info /Background: The City Council approved the subdivision creating this lot in 1984. As part of that approval the City required that a Conservation Restriction be dedicated over that part of the lot within 100 feet of.Arrowhead Lake. This restricted area can be used for yard purposes but cannot be altered or improved with structures without the City's permission. A request has been submitted seeking City approval to construct a new dwelling that would encroach 25 feet into the Restricted area. The proponent also seeks permission to add a deck that would encroach an additional 10 feet into the Conservation Restriction area. Staff supports the request for the following reasons: fi • The 100 Restriction area was adopted around 1970. Since most lots on the lake were platted prior to 1970 they are only subject to the setback requirement of the Zoning ordinance, which is 75 feet. • The combination of the street setback (82. feet) and the lake setback (100 feet) creates an extremely small buildable area. While it would be possible to construct a home in this area, it would be difficult to construct a home in keeping with the size of existing homes in the area. • The size of the proposed dwelling does not represent an over building of the lot. • The proposal does not violate the spirit and intent of the Conservation Restriction, in that an adequate buffer for the lake is maintained. • The proposed setback is similar to the setback enjoyed by other homes in the vicinity. See attached Council minutes from plat approval, Conservation Restriction, plans and request, and correspondence. LOCATION MAP .Overview :4 • �n d /IN.x�I■ Request to Amend Conservation Restriction 6608 Indian Hills Road October 03, 2002 To: Edina City Council Mary Jo & I have purchased a lot located at 6608 Indian Hills Road pending approval of our plan to build a new home. Mary Jo & I have retained the services of an architect with instructions to design a modest sized home that will meet our needs and make the best use of the lot. The foundation footprint meets the front and side yard setbacks however it requires a variance. for the back yard setback. The variance we are asking for is to allow the foundation to be 75 feet back from the high water line and allow 10 additional feet for patio and decks. In reading the history of this lot the city planning department stated "the zoning ordinance provides for variances from the requirements of ordinance, but only upon finding, among other required findings, that the PLIGHT OF THE PETITIONER IS DUE TO CIRCMUSTANCES UNIQUE TO HIS PROPERTY WHICH WERE NOT CREATED BY THE PETITIONER" Also stated: "Approval of the proposed subdivision would be implied approval of the variances" The bottom line: We can only build a 675 square foot structure on the lot without a variance of either the front or back setbacks due. to the 100 foot conservation restriction and the 82 foot setback of the neighbors home setting a front set back requirement. We are asking for a variance to the back setback to allow an approximately 1700 square foot foundation for our new homer On the lot there are 57 trees that are 6" or greater in diameter, we will be required to remove 6 of them to set our home on the lot. All trees along the road will stay except one or two to for our driveway. Please take a look at the plans we have designed for this lot. We hope you will find that we have designed a home that fits with the character of Indian Ills and enhances the neighborhood. Thanks, Jon & Mary Jo Barnett 534 -0 Interlachen Blvd. Edina, MN 55436 J ' W410 PWI TAXES' PA?I DEPi: GF F:GCPER ?Y iA.X & PUBLIC REWROS TRIA S I_,? ENITERED CONSERVATION RESTRICTION JUL ;51990 (Open Space) DEPUTY THIS INDENTURE, Made thisday of July, 1990, between Muriel V. Peterson, single, and Mark W. Peterson and Barbara A. Jerich, husband 30 and wife, (hereinafter together called "Owner "), and the CITY OF EDINA, a li Jmunicipal corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota (hereinafter called "Edina "). v WITNESSETH: .9 That Owner, in consideration of One Dollar ($1.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby Grant, Bargain, Sell and Convey unto Edina, its successors and assigns, Forever, a Conservation Restriction pursuant to Minnesota Statutes § 84.64, for the purposes and on the terms hereinafter specified, over, on and across the tracts or parcels of land lying and being in the County of Hennepin and the State of Minnesota, described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof (hereinafter called "Easement Area "). TO HAVE AND TO HOLD THE SAME, Together with all the hereditaments and appurtenances thereunto belonging, or in anywise appertaining, to Edina, its successors and assigns, Forever. And Owner, for Owner and Owner's heirs, representatives, successors and assigns, covenants with Edina, its successors and assigns, that it is well seized in fee of the Easement Area, and has good right to convey the interests therein pursuant hereto, and that the Easement Area is free from all encumbrances except real estate taxes and installments of special .. assessments payable therewith which are not yet due. And the Easement Area, in the quiet and peaceable possession of Edina, its successors and assigns, for the purposes hereby granted, against all persons lawfully claiming or to claim the whole or any part thereof, subject to the encumbrances hereinbefore mentioned, Owner will warrant and defend. The purpose of this Conservation Restriction is to assure that the Easement Area shall be at all times remain as open space and constitute scenic surroundings. To accomplish this purpose, Owner, for Owner and Owner's heirs, representatives, successors and assigns, does hereby covenant and agree that. 1. No buildings, roads, signs, billboards or other advertising of any kind, and no utilities or other structures of any kind shall be hereafter erected or placed on or above any part of the Easement Area without the express prior written approval of Edina. 2. No soil or other substance or material shall be dumped or placed as landfill on the Easement Area without the express prior written approval of Edina. 3. No trash, waste or unsightly or offensive materials shall be dumped or placed on the Easement Area. 4. No loam, peat, gravel, soil, rock or other material substance shall be excavated, dredged or removed from the Easement Area without the express written approval of Edina. 5. No activities detrimental to drainage, flood control, water conservation, erosion control or soil conservation, or other acts or uses detrimental -2- to the Easement Area as a scenic open space shall be conducted or permitted to be conducted on the Easement Area. 6. The Easement Area shall at all times be kept planted, shrubbed, sodded and otherwise landscaped (hereinafter collectively called "landscaping ") by Owner, Owner's heirs, representatives, successors and assigns, in a manner reasonably acceptable to Edina. 7. The Easement Area, including landscaping, shall be maintained at all times by Owner, Owner's heirs, representatives, successors and assigns, in full compliance with all applicable ordinances of Edina now or hereafter enacted. 8. This Conservation Restriction shall not operate to grant to Edina the right to use or improve, or to permit the public to use or improve, the Easement Area as or for a park. 9. The rights and remedies given by Minnesota Statutes § 84.65 shall be available to Edina. Also, if there shall be a violation or breach, or an attempt to violate or breach, any of the terms, covenants or conditions of this Conservation Restriction, Edina may prosecute any proceedings at law or in equity against the person, firm or corporation violating or breaching, or attempting to violate or breach, any such term, covenant or condition, to either prevent such violation or breach or to recover damages for such violation or breach. Also, Edina, in the event of such violation or breach, without notice, may, at its option, undertake to perform the term, covenant or condition so violated or breached, and the cost incurred, including attorneys' fees, with interest at the highest rate then allowed by law, or, if -3- a.. no maximum rate is applicable, then at the rate of twelve percent (12 %) per annum, shall be payable by Owner, Owner's heirs, representatives, successors and assigns, on demand made by Edina, its successors and assigns, and Owner, Owner's heirs, representatives, successors and assigns shall also pay all costs of collection thereof, including attorneys' fees, with interest thereon as above provided, if payment is not made on demand, whether suit be brought or not. In addition to other remedies then available for collection of such costs and interest, Edina may charge such costs and interest against the Easement Area and any other property then included in the same tax parcel or parcels as the Easement Area, in the same manner as special assessments (without, however, any notice or hearing of any kind) and collect the same with the real estate taxes against the whole of such tax parcel which are payable in the year following the year such costs and interest are so charged. If such charges are not paid, the whole of such tax parcel may be sold and conveyed in the same manner as lands forfeited for nonpayment of real estate taxes are sold and conveyed. 10. The terms, covenants and conditions hereof shall run with the land and shall be binding on all present and future owners and occupiers of the Easement Area, and shall inure only to the benefit of Edina, its successors and assigns, and may be amended or modified at any time and from time to time, by the sole act of Edina and the then owners of the Easement Area, and may be released at any time by the sole act of Edina. -4- 1 . 1 . ". 1 . IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, Owner has caused these presents to be executed the day and year first above written. Muriel V. Peterson Mark W. Peterson Barbara A. Jerich This instrument is exempt from State Deed Tax. Drafted by: Dorsey & Whitney (TSE) 2200 First Bank Place East Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 -5- 1. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) e foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ��' day of 1990, by Muriel V. Peterson, single. �..` ADFONE E. MESSICK my co"M E,r8045 STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) Notary Public e foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 137"r day of 1990, by Mark W. Peterson and Barbara A. Jerich, husband and e. ApptANEE VWXX r 'Anou county My Comm. Exp. &20 -95 Notary Public C. E)HBIT A That part of Lot 1, Block 1, INDIAN HILLS PETERSON ADDITION, according the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota which lies northerly of a circular line concave to the North having a radius of 128.00 feet. Said curve passes through a point on the West line of said Lot 1, Block 1, distant 135.00 feet northerly from the Southwest corner of said Lot 1, Block 1, as measured along said West line, and passes through a point on the East line of said Lot 1, Block 1, distant 152.85 feet northerly from the Southeast corner of said Lot 1, Block 1, as measured along said East line, and said line there terminating; also That part of Lot 2, Block 1, INDIAN HILLS PETERSON ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota which lies northerly and easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the most southerly corner of said Lot 2, Block 1; thence on an assumed bearing of North 41 degrees 48 minutes 00 seconds West, along the southwesterly line of said Lot 2, Block 1, a distance of 130.85 feet; thence North 23 degrees 21 minutes 53 seconds West a distance of 22.00 feet to the actual point of beginning of the line to be described; thence North 39 degrees 10 minutes 45 seconds East a distance of 20.59 feet; thence North 56 degrees 25 minutes 00 seconds East a distance of 74.00 feet; thence easterly and southeasterly a distance of 21.09 feet along a tangential curve concave to the southwest having a radius of 16.00 feet and a central angle of 75 degrees 31 minutes 21 seconds; thence North 56 degrees 25 minutes 00 seconds East, not tangent to said curve, a distance of 12.51 feet; thence South 33 degrees 35 minutes 00 seconds East a distance of 90.00 feet; thence South 76 degrees 43 minutes 40 seconds East a distance of 58.00 feet, more or less, to the East line of said Lot 2, Block 1 and said line there terminating. -7- J • � +1.;UL iii 9.: 39 acIMAN ;: 5684679.: !z %� =f � •• CO. RHORDL•R ':Y...... :' P !j Y - i I ' i - I Duplicate Filing Certificate 50 Cents PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED FOR PETERSON REPLAT OF LOT 3, BLOCK 1, INDIAN HILLS. Affidavit of Notice was presented by Clerk, approved as to form and ordered placed �.. \ {� \• on file. Mr. Hughes presented the request for preliminary plat approval for \` property identified as Lot 3, Block 1, Indian Hills Addition, advising that the subject property measures 92,200 square feet in area, is zoned R -1 Single Family Dwelling District and is developed with a single family dwelling which is centrally located on the lot. The proponent is requesting a subdivision of the property to create one new buildable lot which would be located westerly of the existing build- ing. The new lot would measure about 19,000 square feet in area (exclusive of the land within the bed of Arrowhead Lake) and about 90 feet in width. Mr. Hughes indicated that at the Community Development and Planning Commission meeting it was mentioned that there could be a different configuration for the lot line so as to provide a larger lot area than proposed. The request was reviewed by the Planning Commission at its August 31, 1983, meeting and the Commission recommended approval of the subdivision. ;lr. Hughes informed the Council members that he had received a telephone call from Mrs. John Weston, 6516 Indian Hills Road, stating that she was unable to appear at this meeting and wanted to convey to Council her strong opposition to the subdivision. Mrs. Muriel Peterson, the proponent, advised that she and her husband had lived in their home for the last 35 years and she was re- questing the subdivision to allow a new house in which she would live following her husband's death in July, while her son would occupy the present dwelling. She added that she would work with her neighbors and the City staff to meet the zoning ordinance requirements. Mark Peterson referred to a letter he and his mother had written to members of the Council which set forth their position in this matter and read a letter from Mr. and Mrs. Gordon Peterson in support of the subdivision. Richard Smith, 6600 Mohawk Trail, advised that his home is directly south of the subject property and that he was concerned that if the proposed house were built on the flat area of the property, it would block his view of Arrowhead Lake. He added that his approval of the proposed subdivision voiced at the Planning Commission meeting was contingent upon seeing the plan, the plat, the elevation and the topography. Speaking in favor of the subdivision was Orrin Haugen, 6612 Indian Hills Drive. There being1no further comments, Member Richards offered the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR PETERSON REPLAT OF LOT 3, BLOCK 1, INDIAN HILLS BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that that certain plat known as Peterson Replat of Lot 3, Block 1, Indian Hills, platted by Muriel V. Peterson, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of September 19, 1983, be and is hereby granted preliminary plat approval. Motion was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Bredesen, Richards, Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. Section 1. Paragraph 1 of Section S of Ordinance No. 611 oT the Uity is enlarged by adding the following thereto: "The extent of the Planned Office District (Sub- District POD -1) is enlarged by t addition of the following property: Pa of the south 1/2 of the southwest 1/4 of the northwest 1/4 of Section 32, n ip 2 Tow8, Range 24 and part of the northwest 1/4 of the southwest 1/4 of Sectio 32, Township 28, Range 24, comprising 7.1 acres. Sec. 2. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon passage and publicati . Member Schmidt t n offered the following resolution and moved s adoption: RESOLUTION APPROVING PRELIMINARY PLAT FO (, HEDBERG PARKLAWN ACRES CQ BE IT RESOLVED by the ity Council of the City of Edina, nnesota, that that Q certain plat entitled edberg Parklawn Acres ", platte y Hedberg and Sons Company, a Minnesota cor ration, and presented at t regular meeting of the City Council of February 1984, be and is hereby ranted preliminary plat approval. Motion for adoption of the re lution was seco ed by Member Turner, who stated that the relocation of the park eets prese needs and that it is an appropriate development of that property. Rollcall: Ayes: Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. ADMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE P FO 980 -90 ADOPTED. Affidavit of Notice was presented by Clerk, appr recommended by the Community Member Schmidt offered the fj as to fo and ordered placed on file. As elopment an Planning Commission and the staff, owing resolute n and moved its adoption: T2F.SnT.TTTTnN WHEREAS, the City Counci of the City of Edina opted the Comprehensive Plan 1980 on December 21, 1981, p su—ant to Minnesota Statu s, Section 473.864; and WHEREAS, the Communit Ybevelbpment and Planning Co ssion of the City of Edina has.approved amendm s to the Comprehensive Plan 1 0, on November 30, 1983; and WHEREAS, the City until of-the-City-of Edina has re 'ewed such- amendments to the Comprehensiv lan 1980 and is in concurrence with a decision of the Com- munity Develop t and Planning Commission; • NOW, THEREFO , BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of th City of Edina, that the City Co cil hereby adopts the amendments to the Compre nsive Plan 1980 as it app es to the location and size of a public park and rangement of pro- posed 1 d uses for the area located west of York Avenue Sout north of West 76th eet and east of France Avenue South. Moti for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Tur r. lcall: Schmidt, Turner, Courtney esolution adopted. �v FINAL PLAT APPROVED FOR INDIAN HILLS PETERSON ADDITION. Mr. Hughes presented the Indian Hills Petersen Addition plat for final approval, advising that it is /�. located south of Arrowhead Lake, north of Indian Hills Road and west of Dakota Trail. Preliminary plat approval was received from the Council on September 19, 1983, and subsequently a final plat has been prepared which is nearly identical to the preliminary plat except that the common lot line between the lots has been redrawn to a minor degree. That modification was discussed by the property owner at the time preliminary plat approval was granted. Mr. Hughes stated that all other aspects of the plat remain the same and would recommend final approval subject to subdivision dedication. No objections being heard, Member Schmidt offered the following Resolution and moved its adoption subject to payment of a subdivision dedication of $4,800.00 in lieu of land: RESOLUTION APPROVING INDIAN HILLS PETERSON ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled "Indian Hills Peterson Addition ", platted by Muriel V. Peterson and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council of February 6, 2/6/84 196 1984, be and is hereby granted final plat approval. Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Turner. Rollcall: Ayes: Schmidt, Turner, Courtney Resolution adopted. LOT DIVISION APPROVED FOR LOT 3, BLOCK 1 MCCAULEY HEIGHTS 3RD ADDITION. Mr. Hughes presented the pLXtion of Paul and Carol Modell for division of Lot 3, Block 1 McCauley Heights Addition, generally located north of McCauley Circle an east of McCauley Tr U West. He advised that the proponent requests a party all division of an existi two family dwelling and that individual utility co ections are provided. Staff wo recommend approval of the lot division. No ob' ctions being heard, Member Turne offered the following resolution and moved i adoption: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the following descri ed property is at present a single trac of land: Lot 3, Block 1, McCauley ights 3rd Addition; and WHEREAS, the owner has requeste the subdivision of said tract into eparate parcels (herein called "Parcels ") escribed as follows: That part of Lot 3, Block 1, Cauley Heights 3rd Addition ying North- easterly of a line drawn from a oint on the Southeasterl line of said Lot 3, distant 59.7 feet Northea erly of the most South ly corner thereof, - to a point on the Northwesterly li of said Lot 3, dis nt 60.66 feet Northeasterly of the most Westerly rner thereof, an there terminating, and That part of Lot 3, Block 1, McCauley ights 3rd westerly of a line drawn from a point on he Sout Lot 3 distant 59.7 feet Northeasterly of he mos to a point on the Northwesterly line of sai Northeasterly of the most Westerly corner t WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance Regulations of the City of Edina will create an Parcels as separate tracts of land do not inter Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contain Nos. 801 and 811; Lo h ition lying sterly line of said outherly corner thereof, distant 60.66 feet ie f, and there terminating; %- the Subdivision and Zoning ne ssary hardship and said ere W1 the purposes of the in the ty of Edina Ordinance NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by t City Council o the City of Edina.. that the conveyance and ownership of sai arcels as separat tracts of land is hereby approved and the requirements an provisions of Ordinan No. 801 and Ordinance No. 811 are hereby waived to llow said as separate tracts of land but are n waived for other provision thereof, and subjec , however, to subdivision be made of said Parce unless made.i; ordinances of the City of Edina with the prior be provided for by those ordina es. division and c veyance thereof any other purpo or as to any the provisions th no further 1 compliance with th pertinent approval of this Council as may Motion for adoption of the resol ion was seconded by Member Schmidt. Rollcall: Ayes: Schmidt, Turner, Cour ey Resolution adopted. LOT DIVISION APPROVED FOR LO 3 BLOCK 1 THE HABITAT. Mr. Hughes presented the petition of Wally Irwin and udy Trones for division of Lot 3, Block 1, The Habi- tat, generally located nor of Vernon Avenue and east of Lincoln Drive. He advised that the proponent requests a party wall division of a recently completed two family dwelling and that individual utility connections are provided. Staff would recommend approval of the lot division. No objections being heard, Member Schmidt offered the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the following described property is at present a single tract of land: Lot 3, Block 1, The Habitat, and WHEREAS, the owner has requested the subdivision of said tract into separate Mrs. Jean (Richard) Smith 6600 Mohawk Trail Edina, MN 55439 October 9, 2002 The Honorable Mayor Dennis Maetzold 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Request to Reduce Conservation Easement 6608 Indian Hills Road Dear Mayor Dennis Maetzold: It is the purpose of this letter to set forth my objections to any proposed reduction or revocation in the conservation restriction at 6608 Indian Hills Road. I am the owner /occupant of my home at Mohawk Trail, which is immediately adjacent to and overlooking the subject property and have resided there for about 25 years. The present conservation easement was created as the negotiated result of a prior request for a waiver /variance from the same owner, and the present request to reduce this restriction is considered ill- founded and not in the best interests of either the City of Edina or the owners of adjacent property, particularly those owning property overlooking the affected property. My husband Richard, now deceased, and I both opposed the grant of the waiver /variance extended to Mr. Mark Peterson several years ago, with the grant of the variance at that time permitting Mr. Peterson to build a residence at 6600 Indian Hills Road which extended beyond the boundaries permitted by the regulations for his building. In exchange for the waiver /variance which he did receive, we were informed that Mr. Peterson granted the City the current conservation easement for his adjoining property at 6608 Indian Hills Road which he now wants to revoke. This conservation easement is a right which I have been granted and now personally hold as the owner of adjacent property . Mayor Dennis Maetzold Page Two October 9, 2002 at 6600 Mohawk Trail. This same conservation easement provides me, as the owner of an adjoining property, a less obstructed view of open space than would be possible if the conservation restriction, which I now hold, is permitted to be revoked. This conservation easement is also an asset of the City of Edina, and it should also make every effort to preserve this asset in the best interests of the City. For these reasons, I sincerely request that the Council deny the request and accordingly permit it to remain in place. Respectfully, Mrs. Jean (Richard) Smith - v t u h mn w El nay, Im a a a s h mn w El nay, Im I i � 1 4q _ x S f r s t� r t , .�y a� t*n .ter .. Im 4 S �s i Im i Orrin M. Haugen HAUGEN LAW FIRM PLLP ;ric O. Haugen dark J. Burns* 1130 TCF Tower 'Also Admitted In Wisconsin 121 South Eighth Street Robert J. Jacobson Minneapolis, MN 55402 of Counsel Telephone 612 - 339 -8300 • Facsimile 612- 339 -8200 Toll Free 866 - 339 -8300 October 11, 2002 The Honorable Mayor and City Council of The City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55435 Re: Request to Reduce Conservation Easement 6608 Indian Hills Road Dear Mayor and Council Persons: Patents Trademarks Copyrights Unfair Competition My wife Marilyn and I are, and for the past 50 years, have been the owners and reside with our family, at 6612 Indian Hills Road, property adjoining the Peterson property which is the subject of the above request for reduction of an established conservation easement. In 1990, Mark Peterson, his wife, and his mother Muriel the owners of property which included the conservation restriction tract, applied for a variance to allow construction of a new residence building on property adjoining the easement tract. The application for variance was initially rejected, which led to negotiation of a 100 foot restriction upon the property at 6608 Indian Hills Road at the Petersons' request and consent. In return for conveying the conservation easement to the City of Edina, they were awarded a variance. At the time, we opposed the Peterson application for variance suspecting that there would be a later attempt to modify the negotiated easement, which apparently has turned out to be the case. The conservation restriction or easement was created pursuant to Sections 84.64 and 84.65 of Minnesota Statutes. Section 84.64 defines conservation restrictions as a right given by the property owner appropriate to retaining land or water areas predominantly in their natural scenic or open condition, and forbids or limits construction or placing of buildings on or above the ground. A copy of this section is attached. Section 84.64 of Minnesota Statues provides that all restrictions shall be duly recorded and indexed in the office of the county recorder or registrar of titles, so as to affect title to the property, and the recording shall include the legal description of the property. The statutory requirement was accomplished by recording of the conversation restriction dated July 13, 1990 between the owners of the property and the City of Edina, recorded July 25, 1990 as Document No. 5684679, files of the Registrar of Titles of Hennepin County. The recorded document is notice to all parties of the existence of the conservation restrictions, and notice of the right of the City of Edina to prosecute any violations thereof and to assess the costs of the prosecution including attorney's fees against any violator. The document is the explicit notice to any purchaser of the property of the existence of the restriction. As the owner of the adjoining property, we oppose the application for reduction of the conservation easement, and request the City of Edina, as the holder thereof, to enforce the agreement of July 13, 1990. Any purchaser of the subject property did so with full knowledge of the existence of the easement and its enforceability. The application is being made by or for the benefit of the grantor of the easement given as part of the negotiation of a variance to allow construction of a new residence. The size of the new residence substantially exceeded that of a prior building so that the new structure was not in compliance with certain set -back requirements and perhaps other restrictions as well. These factors necessitated a variance which the city then granted in exchange for the conservation easement. The grantor of the easement continues to enjoy the full benefit of the variance. Now, for financial reasons, the grantor wants to rescind the most significant part of the easement. There are no principles of law or equity that justify the partial termination of this easement. We believe the circumstances under which the conservation easement was created imposes an affirmative I obligation upon the owner of an interest in the burdened property to comply with the terms thereof. Thank you for your consideration. Very trul your in 7, Haugen ilyn D. Haugen Minnesota Statutes 2002, 84.64 Page 1 of 1 4 Minnesota Statutes 2002, Table of Chapters Table of contents for Chapter 84 84.64 Conservation restrictions. Subdivision 1. Acquisition. A conservation restriction for a definite period or in perpetuity may be acquired by: (a) The commissioner of natural resources, in the name of the state, by gift, purchase or exchange, with funds specifically made available for that purpose; (b) A nonprofit charitable corporation whose purposes include conservation of land or water areas; or (c) A home rule charter or statutory city. Subd. 2. Definition. For the purpose of this section, a "conservation restriction" means a right, whether or not stated in the form of a restriction, easement, covenant or condition, in any deed, will or other instrument executed by or on behalf of the owner of land or in any order of taking, appropriate to retaining land or water areas predominately in their natural, scenic, open or wooded condition, or as suitable habitat for fish and wild life, to forbid or limit any or all: (a) Construction or placing of buildings, roads, signs, billboards or other advertising, utilities or other structures on or above the ground. (b) Dumping or placing of soil or other substance or material as landfill, or dumping or placing of trash, waste or unsightly or offensive materials. (c) Removal or destruction of trees, shrubs or other vegetation. (d) Excavation, dredging or removal of loam, peat, gravel, soil, rock or other material substance in such manner as to affect the surface. (e) Surface use except for purposes permitting the land or water area to remain predominately in its natural condition. (f) Activities detrimental to drainage, flood control, water conservation, erosion control or soil conservation, or fish and wild life habitat preservation, or (g) Other acts or uses detrimental to such retention of land or water areas. HIST: 1974 c 531 s 1; 1975 c 163 s 1; 1979 c 159 s 1 Copyright 2002 by the Office of Revisor of Statutes, State of Minnesota. Otte TO: Mayor & City Council REQUEST FOR PURCHASE FROM: Wayne D. Houle, PE, City Engineer VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: October 15, 2002 AGENDA ITEM IV. A. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Contract No. 02 -06 ENG - Traffic Signals: Edinborough Way and West 76 "' Street and West 76th Street and York Avenue, Improvement Nos. TS -27 & TS -32, S.A.P. Nos. 120 -036- 15 and 120 - 020 -35. Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Hardrives, Inc. 1. $ 509,343.45 2. Midwest Asphalt 2. $ 526,866.35 3. Bituminous Roadways 3. $ 551,518.50 4. Thomas & Sons Construction, Inc. 4. $ 572,105.98 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Hardrives, Inc. $ 509,343.45 GENERAL INFORMATION: This project is for construction of signal improvements for the intersections of York Avenue and Edinborough Way along West 76th Street. Staff initiated this project in 1999. The project was reheard and authorized at the April 2, 2002, City Council Meeting. Acquisitions of easements were required for the project and were obtained this past summer. This project is part of the Capital Improvement Plan. The Engineer's estimated project cost is $445,781.25. Both signal systems were. bid higher than anticipated with majority of cost overrun due to the rehabilitation of the existing signals system at York Avenue and West 76th Street; this intersection is fully funded through the Municipal State Aid System. Edinborough Way and West 76th Street is funded using a combination of Municipal State Aid System Funds along with special assessments. This project was bid out one year ago and was rejected due to high costs. Hennepin County Public Works Department then agreed to installation of loop detectors at this intersection, which shall save approximately $35,000 to $40,000. The project construction schedule is for spring and early summer of 2003. Staff feels the project is necessary, cost effective, and feasible from an engineering standpoint and recommends awarding this project to Hardrives, Inc. Public Works — Engineering Sig ature Department The Recommended Bid is within budget not within budget J Wal ' , Finance Director /ae . Gordon Hughes, City Manager TO: FROM: VIA: Mayor & City Council REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Wayne D. Houle, PE, City Engineer Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: October 15, 2002 AGENDA ITEM IV. B. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Contract No. 02 -10 PW - Well house electrical and mechanical replacement at three locations: Well #5 — 3850 West 69th Street, Well # 15 — 5005 Mirror Lakes Drive, and Well # 18 — 7350 York Avenue South, Improvement No. WM -406. -- — Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Municipal Builders 2. NewMech Company, Inc. 3. Magney Construction, Inc. 4. Total Mechanical Services, Inc. 5. Shank Constructors, Inc. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Municipal Builders GENERAL INFORMATION: 1. $ 275,470.00 2. $ 282,000.00 3. $ 294,400.00 4. $ 295,002.00 -5 $ "- 303;885.00 $ 275,470.00 This bid was for the electrical and mechanical replacement at three well houses. This project, is part of our annual capital plan work to maintain our water system in proper working condition. The Water Utility Fund will fund this improvement. This project was bid out earlier this past summer and rejected due to higher than anticipated costs. Staff then reworked the schedule and scope of work for the project. The Engineer's estimate for this project is $282,885.00. Staff recommends awarding this bid to Municipal Builders. 'Signature Public Works — Utilities Department t The Recommended Bid is %f within budget not within budget„ Jo Ilin, finance Director Gordon Hughes, City o e U) REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # V. A. From: Vince Bongaarts Consent Traffic Safety Coordinator Information Only ❑ Date: October 15, 2002 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Attached Traffic Safety Minutes Action ® Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance n Discussion Recommendation: Review and approve Traffic Safety Minutes of October 4, 2002. Info /Background: TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW FRIDAY OCTOBER 4, 2002 The staff review of traffic safety matters occurred on October 4, 2002. Staff present included the City Planner, Chief of Police, City Engineer, Public Works Sign Coordinator, and the Traffic Safety Coordinator. From that review, the below recommendations are provided. On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and the Staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They have also been informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, they can be included on the October 15, 2002 Council Agenda. SECTION A: Requests on which the staff recommends approval. 1. Request for stop signs at the intersection of Biscayne Blvd. and Continental Dr. The requestor feels that because of the 'cut through' traffic and the layout of the intersection there is the potential for a serious accident. The requestor lives on the southwest corner of this intersection. A study of the intersection did show it to be somewhat unique. Biscayne Blvd. runs east/west and 'T's' into Continental Dr. To continue east on Biscayne Blvd. from Continental Dr. you have to turn right, or south, for approximately 200 feet where Continental Dr. ends as the street curves east becoming Biscayne Blvd. again. Continental Dr. has only 10 homes and ends to the north at Stauder Circle. The major traffic flow to enter and exit the area is from Stauder Cir. south on Continental Dr. to Biscayne Blvd. and west on Biscayne Blvd. to various parts of southwest Parkwood Knolls. Stauder Cir. curves to the north; west of Continental Dr. Subsequently, people traveling to the extreme southwest area of Parkwood Knolls use Continental Dr. and Biscayne Blvd. going into the area and vice versa when coming out. Continental Dr. from Stauder Cir. to Biscayne Blvd. carries 284 vehicles a day. Normally a residential street with 10 homes would generate approximately 110 vehicles a day or less. TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW October 4, 2002 Page 2 of 3 Problems arise when eastbound Biscayne Blvd. traffic turns onto northbound Continental Dr. assuming all traffic southbound on Continental Dr. is going to turn right to westbound Biscayne Blvd. and not continue straight ahead. No accidents have been reported at this intersection but requestors have had vehicles end up in their yard to avoid collision with another vehicle. The average daily traffic for Biscayne Blvd. west of Continental Dr. is 399 vehicles. No speed problem was found for either street. The 85- percentile speed was under 30 mph. The staff feels the situation lacks warrants however there is a definite need to define the right -of -way. The staff recommends the installation of a stop sign for eastbound Biscayne Blvd. at Continental Dr. SECTION B: Requests on which the staff recommends denial of request. None for the October 4, 2002 meeting. SECTION C: Requests that are deferred to a later date or referred to others: 1. At the July 16, 2002 Edina Council Meeting: Resolution No. 2002 -61 Conditional Use Permit was approved for St. Peter's Lutheran Church and School Day Care Facility at 3721 West Fuller St. During public comment, Wendy Brockman, 3624 West Fuller St. voiced concern regarding the traffic generated in this area by buses and trucks using West Fuller to turn around on in order to return to France Ave. or W. 54th St. She was also concerned that it became very congested when parents were delivering or picking children up from school. The issue of traffic was then referred to the Traffic Safety Coordinator for study. The area in question for study was traffic on the 5400 block of Drew Ave. from W. 54 th St. to W. Fuller St. and W. Fuller St., from Drew Ave. to France Ave. TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW October 4, 2002 Page 3 of 3 Surveys were done on both streets the week before school started and the first week of school. The average daily traffic on Drew Ave. the week before school started was 181 vehicles. Saturday it was 151 vehicles and Sunday it was 136 vehicles. The average daily traffic on Drew Ave. the week of school was 276 vehicles, an increase of 95 vehicles per day. Saturday's count the week after school started was 147 vehicles and Sunday's was 168 vehicles. The average daily traffic on West Fuller St. the week before school started was 200 vehicles. Saturday was 143 vehicles and Sunday was 164 vehicles The average daily traffic on West Fuller St. the first week of school was 351 vehicles, an increase of 151 vehicles. Saturday week after school started was 155 vehicles and Sunday was 256 vehicles. Traffic increases occurred between 8 -9 a.m., 11 a.m. -12 p.m., and 3 p.m. -4 p.m. Other time periods did not change with any significance. A truck classification survey showed very little truck or bus traffic on either of the surveys. Speed surveys showed no speed problems with 85- percentile speeds under 25 mph. There have been no accidents reported in this area since 1/1/97. The traffic the week after school started was less than many other residential areas without schools. The concerned resident lives on the northeast corner of the Drew Ave. and West Fuller St. intersection. The west side of her house is only a few feet from Drew Ave. This is somewhat unfortunate in that she probably does experience more traffic noise, etc. than other residents' experience. The staff feels at this time there does not appear to be a traffic problem at this location. The resident has been advised. To: „ Mayor & City Council From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: October 15, 2002 Subject: Election Canvass Date REPORURECOMMENDATION Agenda Item V.B. Consent Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA „ ® To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion _ Recommendation: Set a special meeting date of November 6, 2002 at 5:00 p.m. to canvass the results of the November 5, 2002 General Election. ° Info /Background: M.S. 205.185, Subd. 3 requires that within seven days after an election, the governing body of a city shall canvass the returns and declare the results. of the election. Historically, the Edina City Council has met to conduct their canvass of the returns at 5:00 p.m. on the Wednesday following the election. Staff recommends this date again this year. (-k Oi M REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item V.C. From: Debra Mangen Consent ❑ City Clerk Information Only ❑ Date: October 15, 2002 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council. Subject: Tax Forfeit Property Action ❑ Motion ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Adopt a resolution requesting the tax forfeited property Outlot A, Dearborn Addition, PID No. 30- 11.721210162 be conveyed to the City for public use for storm water management. Info /Background: Hennepin County Taxpayer Services Division has advised the City that a parcel of land has been forfeited due to nonpayment of taxes. The property is Outlot A, Dearborn Addition A location map is attached for the property. The City's options are: 1. Approve the parcel for sale at public auction; 2: Approve the auction of the parcel to adjacent property owners only; or 3. Request conveyance of the property to the City for public use. Staff has reviewed the parcel of land and believes that the property should be conveyed to the City for use for storm water management because it is adjacent to a city owned parcel used as a pond. 12140 A. EO 2ND ST 8 SMWCE F6----'" 30-117-21-21-0162 CT 0 outot utiot B ------- BELMORE • W Mi L MALONEY AVE II J N W+E s Engineering Dept September, 2002 o e REPORT /RECOMMENDATION ISO To: Mayor & City Council From: Wayne D. Houle, PE WAA- Director of Public Works Date: October 15, 2002 Subject: Report on Street Maintenance — West 66th Street and West Shore Drive Area. Recommendation: Agenda Item # V.D. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ❑ Motion 0 Resolution ❑ Ordinance ® Discussion Review the attached Report on Street Maintenance within West 66th street and West Shore Drive Area. Info /Background: A letter dated September 25 from City of Edina resident Kenneth M. Chavis and also a petition from the neighborhood of West 66th Street and West Shore Drive was submitted to the Edina City Council at the October 1, 2002 meeting. The letter and petition refer to street maintenance (sweeping) policies along with shoreline buffer policy of West 66th Street Causeway at Lake Cornelia. Attach is a report responding to these issues. 0 e Ttocn)) R EPORT: STREET MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES EDINA PUBLIC WORKS a DATE: October 8, 2002 SUBJECT: Petition Regarding Street Sweeping - East of Highway 100 Between TH62 /West 70th St. and West Shore Dr. This report is written in response to the letter dated September 25, 2002 with the accompanying petition regarding street sweeping practices within the neighborhood as described above. We feel that the recent Level of Service provided for this neighborhood is not inferior to roadway maintenance received in other parts of the City of Edina. The Edina Public Works Department has a very aggressive street sweeping program to clean our 800 lane miles of City streets and 45 parking lots. The City is divided into three street sweeping routes. A typical street sweeping cycle requires 6 people to accomplish this task, i.e.: street sweeper, front -end loader, and truck operators for hauling sediment and debris away. The first cycle begins in early March to rid the streets of winter sand and debris; the second cycle begins in the fall to help prevent leaves from obstructing the storm sewer system. The sweepers and operators are also utilized from June to September for paving and sealcoating operations. When not being utilized for other street maintenance operations, one to two of our sweepers are continuously sweeping throughout the summer. In fact, due to the warm weather and lack of snow this past winter we had one to two sweepers almost continuously sweeping throughout the winter months. Streets are not routinely swept on a weekly basis as mentioned in the September 25 letter. Increasing the sweeping frequency would require a significant investment in equipment and personnel. The September 25 letter mentioned that street sweeping was being compromised by a hiring freeze and that the Public Works department is short- handed. This is not the case. The Public Works Department has been at full strength up until approximately September 1St, when one of our employees resigned. The perception of street maintenance varies depending on where a person lives. For example, if a person lives on a steeper graded roadway or along a hill they may never see the accumulation of sand, except in the winter months. A person at the bottom of the hill or anywhere the grade levels off would typically see an accumulation of sand and debris throughout the year before this roadway is swept. The more level areas, areas around storm sewer inlets, and areas at the bottom of hills are areas that the sweeper operators concentrate on more during the none -cycle street sweeping operations. The September 25 letter also mentioned the lack of mowing along the West 66th Street Causeway, the roadway separating the two halves of Lake Cornelia. The City's policy is to allow shorelines to go un -mowed when possible to provide a buffer for wildlife habitat and water quality. Page 2 of 2 Report: Street Maintenance Activities Subject: Petition Regarding Street Sweeping A large percentage of the City pavements are approaching twenty to thirty years old. Along with the aging process comes more maintenance of the system. Staff is very committed to "working smart" to maintain our City roadways while continuously stretching given resources in both funding and available labor. Kenneth M. Chavis 6509 Ryan Avenue Edina, MN 55435 952 927 6976 September 25, 2002 City of Edina, MN CITY COUNCIL 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424 Dear City Council Members: The accompanying petition is being submitted for your consideration. Both myself and the overwhelming majority of the homeowners in my neighborhood request resumption n Crosstown 62 and 70th street d bodered by West Shore Drive 100 between Crosstown for the following reasons: 1. Our neighborhood streets are no longer being cleaned regularly. They have only been cleaned curb to curb two, perhaps three times this summer from June 1 st up to the present time after I called the public works department. My first call was made when the sand deposited over the winter months had not been adequately cleaned up. Consequently, I was sweeping up sand in my garage and home d other debris accumulated n he call eets and at storm sewe ss and leaves e 2. Around July 20th after I had called in my second request, Shawn Anderson, foreman for city street maintenance, came to my home to discuss my concerns with me regarding the lack of adequate street cleaning. I was informed the Public Works Dept. is short staffed because there is a city hiring freeze in effect and several long time employees who had retired were not replaced. W off had a street cordial leaning sopot holes could be filed her how he had to pull his crew 3. This past summer, the city seemed to be depending on "Street Cleaning By Rain Fall ". I jog through my neighborhood on a regular basis and too many corner storm sewers have been blocked by nature's and people's refuse. A number of these sewers empty into 9 Mile Creek when rain falls, carrying the debris into the creek. By failing to adequately clean the streets, the city is contributing to the pollution of the creek. 4. Autumn is here and the failing leaves are beginning to collect in the streets. Rainfall will only cause further blockage of the storm sewers resulting in flooded street corners. This makes for a serious hazard to car traffic, pedestrians, and joggers alike. 5. On certain streets, boulevard trees are overgrown to the extent some are as low as 5 feet up from the curb and roadway. Lack of trimming makes such trees contributors of twig and leaf debris resulting in dirty streets. � J DATE: o e �� City of Edina, Minnesota SEPTEMBER 25, 202 CITY COUNCIL 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 (612) 927 -8861 • (612) 927 - 7645 -FAX • (612) 927 - 5461 -TDD PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL ❑ SIDEWALK ❑ ALLEY PAVING ❑ WATERMAIN STORM SEWER ❑ SANITARY SEWER ❑ STREET LIGHTING CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ❑ PERMANENT STREET ® OTHER: sTRFFTs CURB SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER WEED REMOVAL AND CONTROL ON 66th ST. SEPARATING LAKE CORNELIA. To the Mayor and City Council: regularly scheduled cleaning of The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the above to the locations listed below. STREETS EAST OF HYWY 100 between CROSSTOWADDRESS LOCAT1oN OF 1110 EI►�NT BY STREET NAME BORDERED BY WEST SHORE DRIVE between ADDRESS LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME between LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS between RES LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY S7 -BEET NAME ADD S THE CITY COUNCIL MA PROPERTIES BENEFITIN COU RiZI and 70th STREET AND PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITIO THAT y STS ROVEMENTS AGAINST THE OUNTS DETERMINED BY THE By CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STA PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME SIGNATURE (PRINTED) Kenneth M. Chavis (r C� Geraldino rhavis T o.l.ltd � Yfi�.F1•+ -- This petition was circulated by: PROPERTY ADDRESS 6509 Ryan Ave OWNER'S PHONE 952 927 6976 6sna Ryan Ave gs2 997 6976 �Si 2 /LYE AVE- 'TV 2 —gzq— i3 6509 RYAN AVENUE — 952 927 6976 KENNETH M CHAVI� ADDRESS PHONE NAME There is space for more signatures on the back or you may attach extra pages. SEPTE,,,ANER,9W ADDRESS and ADDRESS and ADDRESS and ADDRESS PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITIO THAT y STS ROVEMENTS AGAINST THE OUNTS DETERMINED BY THE By CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STA PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME SIGNATURE (PRINTED) Kenneth M. Chavis (r C� Geraldino rhavis T o.l.ltd � Yfi�.F1•+ -- This petition was circulated by: PROPERTY ADDRESS 6509 Ryan Ave OWNER'S PHONE 952 927 6976 6sna Ryan Ave gs2 997 6976 �Si 2 /LYE AVE- 'TV 2 —gzq— i3 6509 RYAN AVENUE — 952 927 6976 KENNETH M CHAVI� ADDRESS PHONE NAME There is space for more signatures on the back or you may attach extra pages. SEPTE,,,ANER,9W '° .. ------ PROPERTY ADDRE OWNE_Rls g PROPERTY OWNER'S (PRINTED) 1. SIGNATURE (IweYn v G y04 S mad �Sa -�1� U f A /_ i i� �•u 33Si�e�� gsa �sZ 2� ,4913 (p(, J-7 e(�•y/���J�1 �� �Sa" ja7 "69 31 � ---- - F"y,) G 5zyZ7fz ion .S FrG AA A10 ilzllt-- AI v T5.. ?'9zc -I�12 oz i r2�� iLl l PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE OWNER'S NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNER'S PHONE j (PRINTED) �.taerC is L, �x► C��izs 1 1.; `lzo -sz rn e 11 Yl / -- .., / 6.56 `12 5 - '01 k Z10F wt- p, 7 -�I - 604 6 S 3 ✓ a 4'f L(,E%C. :i—kLl���� �81-1c'J C��S lv 1( qA7- (� Spa -r Cve_� rJ 'Y -7/-] „v, &yTb Sy 927 -"1 Sao .�.� �r %� w, ��� (�2�u I'Z.z� -t'i�= �,r Sl�l. 60 OK, 2,0) � !, 0 4r�Pr 3Z� Shy d�rr, 26 64 2.QcL)rne1( wsAo ,--e �✓; �i �a --`7 381 oscn � shoe 9fR-73 9 CJoN� (DW lZ 0 Ave. q2� - -3,3q2 PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME SIGNATURE (PRINTED) M��u� -E� DogrFs PROPERTY ADDRESS 2_q OWNER'S PHONE 5 z' — S tU�r �� -574' 6mr but k LL 1 I j i 1-r All 6� • MTA � -�yi_ 2, o f SiUg,Y- ' r D ��r 2 7w In cr'► i ��1�4�a:i�� � -��Z � Z4 - f 6 �(. ds 33 q5a _R - (a5l 6533 i I /cLIAAl Qrn �o kerWac,Q q;-(c�?SG? 6mr but k LL 1 I j i 1-r All 6� • MTA � -�yi_ 2, o f SiUg,Y- ' r D ��r 2 7w In cr'► i ��1�4�a:i�� � -��Z � Z4 - f 6 �(. ds 33 q5a _R - (a5l 6533 i ff) �4 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: Wayne Houle, PC City Engineer Date: October 15,2002 Subject: Approve Resolution Authorizing City Hall Storm Sewer Maintenance Declaration for a Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Permit. Agenda Item # V. E. Consent Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ❑ Motion ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2002 -86 Authorizing City Hall Storm Sewer Maintenance Declaration fora Minnehaha Creek -Watershed District Permit and authorize the Mayor and City Manager to sign said Declaration. c Info /Background: The construction of City Hall and Police Station require an erosion control permit from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. To acquire this permit, a Declaration must be recorded for the maintenance of a required grit chamber. A grit chamber is a modified manhole that is installed within a storm sewer pipe system that catches sediment before the storm water leaves the system. The majority of the proposed City Hall and Police Station site storm water drains to the Mill Pond located above the Brown Dale Dam on the Minnehaha Creek. Edina Public Works will maintain this grit chamber. Staff recommends approval of this declaration. RESOLUTION NO. 2002 -86 C i V )f IL" dir,a A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A CITY HALL STORM SEWER MAINTENANCE DECLARATION FOR ACQUISITION' OF AN EROSION CONTROL PERMIT WITH MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT WHEREAS,. the City of Edina is in need of an Erosion Control Permit with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District for the construction of City Hall and Police Station; and WHEREAS, the Declaration shall state a maintenance plan for the required grit chamber. NOW, THEREFORE, the Edina City Council approved the Declaration and authorized the Mayor and City Manager to sign the Declaration and return a certified copy to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Adopted this 15`h day of October, 2002. ATTEST: City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA )SS CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of October 15, 2002, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this - - -- day of ,20 --. City Clerk City Hall (952) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (952) 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (952) 826 -0379 DECLARATION THIS DECLARATION ( "Declaration ") is made this day of , 2002, by City of Edina, a body corporate and politic and a statutory city in the State of Minnesota (" Declarant "). RECITALS WHEREAS, Declarant is the owner of real property within the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described at: That part of Tract D, Registered Land Survey No. 212, Files of Registrar of Titles, County of Hennepin and that part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, Section 18, Township 28, Range 24, all described as follows: Beginning at the point of intersection of the Easterly line of said Tract D and the Northerly right -of -way line of Eden Avenue; thence Southwesterly along the Northerly right -of -way line of Eden Avenue a distance of 87.30 feet; thence North deflecting to the right 112 degrees, 46 minutes, 17 seconds, a distance of 255.05 feet more or less to the Southerly right -of -way of West 50th Street; thence Easterly along said Southerly right -of -way line to its intersection with the Northerly right -of -way line of said Eden Avenue; thence Southwesterly along said Northerly right -of- way line to the point of beginning. And: Commencing at'point of intersection of Easterly line of Tract D, Registered Land Survey No. 212 and Northerly line of Eden Avenue; Thence Westerly along said Northerly line 87.3 feet to actual point of beginning; Thence deflecting at 112 degrees, 46 minutes, 17 seconds, a distance of 255.05 feet more or less to Southerly line of 5011, Street West; Thence Westerly along said Southerly line to West line of Section; Thence South along said West line to Northerly line of Eden Avenue; Thence Easterly along said Northerly line to Beginning existing Highway. (the "Property ") and no one other than Declarant, has any right, title or interest in the Property; and WHEREAS, the Property constitutes the entirety of the land to which Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Permit # 02 -337 applies; and WHEREAS, Declarant desires to subject the Property to certain conditions and restrictions imposed by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District as a condition to issuance of their Permit # 02 -337 for the mutual benefit of the owners of the Property. NOW, THEREFORE, Declarant makes this Declaration and hereby declares that this Declaration shall constitute convenants to run with the Property, and further declares that the Property shall be owned, used, occupied, and conveyed subject to the convenants, restrictions, easements, charges and liens set forth in this Declaration, all of which shall be binding on all persons owning or acquiring any right, title or interest in the Property, and their heirs, successors, personal representatives, and assigns. 1. Stormwater Facility Maintenance. The terms of Attachment B, incorporated herein, shall apply to the stormwater management facilities indicated on Attachment A, identified as follows: One Grit Chamber 2. The recitals set forth above are expressly incorporated herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this instrument the day and year first set forth. DECLARANT: STATE OF MINNESOTA) )ss. COUNTY OF ) By: Its Mayor By: Its City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2002, by Notary Public This Instrument Was Drafted By: City of Edina ATTACHMENT B STORMWATER FACILITY MAINTENANCE These terms apply to the stormwater facilities constructed pursuant to Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permit application number 02 -337. WHEREAS, application has been made for a permit from the MCWD pursuant to MCWD Rule N, Stormwater Management; and WHEREAS, the property that is the subject of the permit is legally described in the Declaration into which this Attachment is incorporated, and the facilities on the property to which these maintenance requirements apply are as follows: That part of Tract D, Registered Land Survey No. 212, Files of Registrar of Titles, County of Hennepin and that part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter, Section 18, Township 28, Range 24, all described as follows: Beginning at the point of intersection of the Easterly line of said Tract D and the Northerly right -of -way line of Eden Avenue; thence Southwesterly along the Northerly right -of -way line of Eden Avenue a distance of 87.30 feet; thence North deflecting to the right 112 degrees, 46 minutes, 17 seconds, a distance of 255.05 feet more or less to the Southerly right -of -way of West 50th Street; thence Easterly along said Southerly right -of -way line to its intersection with the Northerly right - of -way line of said Eden Avenue; thence Southwesterly along said Northerly right -of -way line to the point of beginning. And: Commencing at point of intersection of Easterly line of Tract D, Registered Land Survey No. 212 and Northerly line of Eden Avenue; Thence Westerly along said Northerly line 87.3 feet to actual point of beginning; Thence deflecting at 112 degrees, 46 minutes, 17 seconds, a distance of 255.05 feet more or less to Southerly line of 50`" Street West; Thence Westerly along said Southerly line to West line of Section; Thence South along said West line to Northerly line of Eden Avenue; Thence Easterly along said Northerly line to Beginning existing Highway. WHEREAS, MCWD Rule N provides that a maintenance agreement shall be submitted for stormwater treatment ponds, outlet structures for such ponds, culverts, outfall structures and all other stormwater facilities, and that the maintenance agreement shall specify methods, schedule and responsible parties for maintenance and must include at a minimum, the elements contained in the District's Maintenance Agreement Form. Attachment B to Form Declaration NOW, THEREFORE: 1. The property owner shall inspect the grit chamber, and outlet structures, for the project in the spring and fall of each year. The property owner shall remove all sediment and debris during the inspections such that the stormwater facilities operate as designed and permitted. 2. Violation of the inspection and/or maintenance provisions of this Agreement is a violation of the MCWD permit for the project for which the MCWD may take action against the property owner. 5. "Property owner" as used in this Attachment means the owner of the property on which is located the stormwater facility to which the obligations herein apply. Attachment B to Form Declaration a, 0 0 w9iN�1r.� a Cn REPORURECOMMENDATION a �. To: Mayor & City Council From: Wayne Houle, PE At-__ City Engineer - Date: October 15, 2002 Subject: Approve Resolution for Traffic Control Signal Agreement with Minnesota Department of Transportation at TH62 and Xerxes Avenue. Recommendation: Agenda Item # V.F. Consent Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action, ❑ Motion ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Adopt a resolution entering into Minnesota - Department of Transportation (MNDOT) Agreement No. 83860R and authorize the Mayor and City Manager to sign said agreement. Info /Background: The Minnesota Department of Transportation is proposing to replace the Traffic Signals located at TH62 and Xerxes Avenue. This project is scheduled for a letting date of November 22, 2002. The construction of this project is fully coordinated by the Minnesota Department of Transportation and will occur during the spring and early summer of 2003. These signals will include Emergency Vehicle Pre - emption Systems that ° will provide emergency vehicles right -of -way during emergencies. The City of Edina, City of Richfield, and the City of Minneapolis will be responsible for minor maintenance, future repainting and supplying power to the signals. Staff from the three Cities have met and concur with these responsibilities and will draft a Letter of Understanding between the Cities. Staff recommends approval of this agreement. RESOLUTION NO. 2002 -87 AUTHORIZING TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL AGREEMENT WITH MN /DOT AT TH62 AND XERXES AVENUE Cty of EdI fl, a BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Edina enter into an agreement with the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation for the following purposes, to wit: To remove the existing traffic control signals and install new traffic control signals with street lights, emergency vehicle pre - emption and signing on Trunk Highway No. 62 South and North Ramps at County State Aid Highway No. 31 (Xerxes Avenue); and install interconnect on County State Aid Highway No. 31 (Xerxes Avenue) from Trunk Highway No. 62 South Ramps to Trunk Highway No. 62 North Ramps in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth and contained in Agreement No. 83860R, a copy of which was before the Council. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the proper City officers be and hereby are authorized to execute such agreement and any amendments, and thereby assume for an on behalf of the City all of the contractual obligations contained therein.-- --- - -- - ATTEST: City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA )SS CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of October 15, 2002, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this - - -- day of __ 20__ —• City Clerk City Hall (952) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (952) 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (952) 826 -0379 MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL AGREEMENT NO. 83860R BETWEEN THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE CITY OF EDINA TO Remove.the existing Traffic Control Signals and Install new Traffic Control Signals with Street Lights, Emergency Vehicle Pre - emption and Signing on Trunk Highway No. 62 South and North Ramps at County State Aid Highway No. 31 (Xerxes Avenue); and Install Interconnect on County State Aid Highway No. 31 (Xerxes Avenue) from Trunk Highway No. 62 South Ramps to Trunk Highway No. 62 North Ramps in Richfield, Minneapolis-and Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota. S.P. 2774 -10 S.A.P. 27 -631 -006 Prepared by Traffic Engineering ESTIMATED AMOUNT RECEIVABLE County of Hennepin $176,850.00 AMOUNT ENCUMBERED None Otherwise Covered PARTIES THIS AGREEMENT is entered into by the Minnesota Department of Transportation, (State), and the County of Hennepin, (County), and the City of Edina, (City). T3TVe4TR1TT Q Minnesota Statutes Section 161.20 authorizes the Commissioner of Transportation to enter into agreements with any governmental authority for the purposes of constructing, maintaining and improving the Trunk Highway system. The State has determined that there is justification and it is in the public's best interest to remove the existing traffic control signals and install new traffic control signals including street lights and signing, (Traffic Control Signal(s)) on Trunk Highway No. 62 South and North Ramps at County State Aid Highway No. 31 (Xerxes Avenue); and install traffic signal interconnect, (Interconnect) on County State Aid Highway No. 31 (Xerxes Avenue) from Trunk Highway No. 62 South Ramps to Trunk Highway No. 62 North Ramps. The City requests and the State agrees to the installation of Emergency Vehicle Pre - emption Systems, (EVP System(s)), as a part of the new Traffic Control Signal installations. 8386OR -1- It is considered in the public's best interest for the State to provide a master controller and two new cabinets and control equipment to operate the new Traffic Control Signals. The County, City and the State will participate in the cost, maintenance and operation of the new Traffic Control Signals, EVP Systems, and Interconnect. CONTRACT 1. The State will prepare the necessary plan, specifications and proposal, (Preliminary Engineering). The State will also perform all necessary construction inspection, (Engineering and Inspection). 2. The Cost of Construction, (Construction Cost) consists of the contract cost of the work or, if the work is not contracted, the actual cost of all labor, materials, and equipment rental required to complete the work. Construction Cost does not include the cost of providing the power supply to the service poles or pads. 3. The State, with its own resources or by contract, will perform the Traffic Control Signal, the EVP System and Interconnect work pursuant to State Project No. 2774 -10 and State Aid Project No. 27- 631 -006 with the Construction Costs shared as follows: 83860R -2- a. Trunk Highway No. 62 South Ramps at County State Aid Highway No. 31 (Xerxes Avenue). System "A ". Traffic Control Signal and EVP System. Estimated Construction Cost is $157,000.00 which includes State - furnished Materials. State's share is 50 percent. County's share is 50 percent. b. Trunk Highway No. 62 North Ramps at County State Aid Highway No. 31 (Xerxes Avenue). System "B ". Traffic Control Signal and EVP System. Estimated Construction Cost is $162,000.00 which includes State - furnished Materials. State's share is 50 percent. County's share is 50 percent. C. On County State Aid Highway No. 31 (Xerxes Avenue) from Trunk Highway No. 62 South Ramps to Trunk Highway No. 62 North Ramps. Interconnect. Estimated Construction Cost is $8,500.00 which includes State - furnished Materials. State's share is 50 percent. County's share is 50 percent. 4. Upon execution of this agreement and receipt of State's written request, the County will make an advance payment 83860R -3- to the State of its project costs. The County's project costs will be the sum of the following: a. The County's share (as specified in Paragraph 3) based on the actual bid prices and the estimated State - furnished material costs. b. Eight percent of its share [Item (a) above] for the cost of Engineering and Inspection. 5. Upon completion and final State acceptance of the project, the County's final project costs will be the sum of the following: a. The County's share (as specified in Paragraph 3), based on the actual Construction Cost and the actual State- furnished material costs. b. Eight percent of its final share [Item (a) above] for the cost of Engineering and Inspection. If the amount of the funds advanced by the County exceeds the County's final project costs, the excess will be promptly returned to the County without interest. If the amount of funds advanced by the County is less than the County's final project costs, the County will promptly pay the balance to the State. 8386OR -4- 6. The City will be responsible for the cost and application to secure an adequate power supply to the service pad or pole (System "A "). Upon completion of this project (System "A"), the City will thereafter pay all monthly electrical service expenses necessary to operate the Traffic Control Signal, Interconnect and EVP System. The City will receive the bill to secure an adequate power supply and for providing the necessary electrical power for the operation of the Traffic Control Signal, Interconnect and EVP System and invoice the City of Richfield for 50 percent of the costs. The City will be reimbursed by the City of Richfield in a separate local Agreement, between the parties. 7. Upon completion of this project (System "A "), the City will, at its cost and expense: (1) maintain the luminaires and all its components, including replacement of the luminaire if necessary; and (2) relamp the new traffic control signal and street lights; and (3) clean and paint the new traffic control signal, cabinet and luminaire mast arm extensions. The City will invoice the City of Richfield for 50 percent of the costs of the above mentioned maintenance responsibilities assigned to the City. The City will be reimbursed by the City of Richfield in a separate local Agreement, between the parties. The State will, at its cost and expense, maintain the signing and 8386OR -5- interconnect and perform all other traffic control signal and street light maintenance. B. The City will be responsible for the cost and' application to secure an adequate power supply to the service pad or pole (System "B "). Upon completion of this project (System "B"), the City will thereafter pay all monthly electrical service expenses necessary to operate the Traffic Control Signal, Interconnect and EVP System. The City will receive the bill to secure an adequate power supply and for providing the necessary electrical power for the operation of the Traffic Control Signal, Interconnect and EVP System and invoice the City of Minneapolis for 50 percent of the costs. The City will be reimbursed by the City of Minneapolis in a separate local Agreement, between the parties. 9. Upon completion of this project. (System "B "), the City will, at its cost and expense: (1) maintain the luminaires and all its components, including replacement of the luminaire if necessary; and (2) relamp the new traffic control signal and street lights; and (3) clean and paint the new traffic control signal, cabinet and luminaire mast arm extensions. The City will invoice the City of Minneapolis for 50 percent of the costs of the above mentioned maintenance responsibilities assigned to the City. The City will be reimbursed by the City of Minneapolis in a separate local Agreement, between the parties. 83860R -6- The State will, at its cost and expense, maintain the signing and interconnect and perform all other traffic control signal and street light maintenance. 10. The EVP Systems will be installed, operated, maintained, or removed in accordance with the following conditions and requirements: a) All maintenance of the EVP Systems must be done by State forces. b) Emitter units may be installed only on authorized emergency vehicles, as defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 169.01, Subdivision 5. Authorized emergency vehicles may use emitter units only when responding to an emergency. The City will provide the State's Assistant Division Engineer or his /her designated representative a list of all vehicles with emitter units. c) Malfunction of the EVP Systems must be reported to the State immediately. d) In the event the EVP Systems or its components are, in the opinion of the State, being misused or the conditions set forth in Paragraph b above are violated, and such 8386OR -7- misuse or violation continues after the City receives written notice from the State, the State may remove the EVP Systems. Upon removal of the EVP Systems pursuant to this Paragraph, all of its parts and components become the property of the State. e) All timing of the EVP Systems will be determined by the State. 11. In the event the State advertises for bids for all or a portion of the work in Paragraph 3, the State will submit to the Hennepin County engineer a certified copy of the low bid received and an abstract of all bids received by the State, together with the State's request for concurrence by the County in the Award of a construction contract. Award.of the contract will not be made until the County Engineer advises the State in writing of its concurrence. 12. Final plans and specifications for construction of the traffic control signal work provided in Paragraph 3 will have County approval prior to award of construction contract by the State. Said County. approval will. be evidenced by signature of the County Engineer in the designated space therefore on the original plan. 13. The construction work provided for herein will be under the direction and supervision of the State. It is agreed, however, that the County will have the right to periodically inspect the cost sharing construction work provided for in Paragraph 3. The State will.have the exclusive right to determine whether the work has been satisfactorily performed by the State's Contractor. 14. The State will insert in any contract with the successful bidder a clause requiring the successful bidder to hold the County and City harmless and also clauses requiring the successful bidder to provide and maintain insurance, all-as follows: a) The Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the County and City, their officials, officers, agents, volunteers, and employees from any liability, claims, causes of action, judgments, damages, losses, costs, or expenses, including reasonable attorneys' fees, resulting directly or indirectly from any act or omission of the Contractor, its subcontractors, anyone directly or indirectly employed by them, and /or anyone for whose acts and /or omissions they may be liable in the performance of the services required by this Contract, and against all loss by reason of 83860R -9- injuries or damages received or sustained by a person, persons, or property on account of the operations of the Contractor or any , subcontractor or their agents or employees; or on account of or in consequence of any neglect in safeguarding the work; or through use of unacceptable materials in constructing the work; or because of any environmental damage or hazardous material damage caused by or resulting from the Contractor's activities; or because of any act or omission, neglect, or misconduct of the Contractor; or because of any claims arising or amounts recovered from infringements of patent, trademark, or copyright; or because of any claims arising or amounts recovered under the Worker's Compensation Act; or under any other law, ordinance, order or decree, or due.to the failure of the Contractor to perform fully, in any respect, all obligations under this Contract. b) In.order to protect itself and Hennepin County the Contractor will at all times 83860R -10- during the term of this Contract, and beyond such term when so required, have and keep in force the following insurance coverages: 1. Commercial General Liability on an occurrence basis with Contractual Liability and Explosion, Collapse, and Underground Property Damage (XCU) Liability coverages: - General Aggregate Limit $1,000,000 - Products -- Completed Operations Aggregate Limit $1,000,000 - Personal and Advertising Injury Aggregate Limit $1,000,000 Each Occurrence - Combined Bodily Injury and Property Damage Limit $1,000,000 2. Automobile Liability Combined single limit each occurrence coverage for bodily injury and property damage covering owned, non- owned, and hired automobiles. Limit $1,000,000 83860R -11- 3. Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability: (A) Workers' Compensation Limit - per Minnesota Statutes. If the Contractor is based outside the State of Minnesota, coverage must apply to Minnesota laws. (B) Employer's Liability. Bodily injury by: Accident - Each Accident $100,000 Disease - Policy Limit $500,000 Disease - Each Employee $100,000 c) An umbrella or excess policy over primary liability insurance coverages is an acceptable method to provide the required insurance limits. The above subparagraphs establish minimum insurance requirements. It is the sole responsibility of the Contractor to determine the need for and to procure additional insurance which may be needed in connection with this contract. Copies of insurance policies will be submitted to the County upon written request. 83860R -12- d) The Contractor will not commence work until the Contractor has obtained required insurance and filed with the County a properly executed and acceptable Certificate of Insurance which clearly evidences all required insurance coverages. The certificate will name Hennepin County as certificate holder, and will also name Hennepin County and the City as additional insureds for the Commercial General Liability coverage with respect to operations covered under the Contract. The certificate should also show that Hennepin County will receive 30 days, prior written notice in the event of cancellation, nonrenewal, or material change in any described policies. The Contractor will furnish.to the County updated certificates during the term of the Contract as insurance policies expire. If the Contractor fails to furnish proof of insurance coverage, the County through the State may cause payments to be withheld from the Contractor, and /or may pursue any other 83860R -13- right or remedy allowed under the Contract, law, equity, and /or statute. e) The County agrees to pay to the State the total amount of the liability insurance coverage premium costs, described herein, incurred by the State's Contractor for State Project No. 2774 -10 in procuring and maintaining for the duration of the Contractor's contractual obligation to said State project. As such time, be it one or more, as the said State's Contractor furnishes the State with a certified statement of the insurance premium costs the Contractor has incurred on procuring the aforesaid insurance coverage, ,the State will invoice the County for the total amount of the insurance premium costs set forth in said certified statement from the Contractor, and the County will, upon receipt of said invoice, promptly make payment thereof to the State. 15. Each party will be solely responsible for its own acts and omissions, and the results thereof, to the extent authorized by law. The State's liability is governed by the 83860R -14- Minnesota Tort Claims Act, Minnesota Statutes Section 3.736. Each party will be solely responsible for its own employees for any Workers Compensation Claims. 16. All timing of the new Traffic Control Signals will be determined by the State, and no changes may be made except with the approval of the State. 17. Upon execution and approval by the County, the City and the State and completion of the construction work provided for herein, this agreement will supersede and terminate any existing Agreements that may exist, between the parties. 18. Any amendment to this Agreement must be in writing and will not be effective until it has been executed and approved by the same parties who executed and approved the original Agreement, or their successors in office. 19. If the State fails to enforce any provisions of this Agreement, that failure does not waive the provision or its right to enforce it. 20. This Agreement contains all negotiations and agreements between the parties. No other understanding regarding this Agreement, whether written or oral, may be used to bind either party. 21. Minnesota law governs this contract. Venue for all legal proceedings arising out of this Agreement, or its 8386OR -15- breach, must be in the appropriate state or federal court with competent jurisdiction in Ramsey County, Minnesota. 22. This Agreement is effective on the date the State obtains all required signatures under Minnesota Statutes 16C.05, Subdivision 2, and will remain in effect until terminated by written agreement of the parties. 23. The State's obligation to perform any work, or to let a Contract for the performance of the work, on the State Project referenced above, is subject to the availability of funding from the Minnesota Legislature or other funding source. 83860R -16- COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ATTEST: By: Deputy /Clerk of the County Board Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Assistant County Attorney Date: APPROVED AS TO EXECUTION: By: Assistant County Attorney Date: (County Seal) By: Chair of its County Board Date: And: Assistant /Deputy /County Administrator Date: And: Assistant County Administrator, Public Works and County Engineer Date: RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: BV: Director, Transportation Department Date: This certifies that the signatories for the County have lawful authority, by virtue of board resolution, to bind the County to the terms of this Agreement. 83860R -17- CITY OF EDINA RECOMMEND FOR APPROVAL: City Attorney DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: Assistant Division Engineer COMMISSIONER OF ADMINISTRATION As delegated to Materials Management Division Bv: Date: 83860R -18- By: Mayor Date: (City Seal) Bv: City Manager Date: DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION By: Assistant Commissioner Date: ATTORNEY GENERAL As to form and execution By: Date: 4 r,k O, REPORT /RECOMMENDATION TO: Mayor & City Council From: Wayne Houle, PE City Engineer Date: October 15, 2002 Subject: - Approve Resolution for Traffic Control Signal Agreement with Minnesota Department of Transportation at TH100 and West 50th Street. Recommendation: Agenda Item # V.G. Consent Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA To Council Action ❑ Motion ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Adopt a resolution entering into Minnesota Department of Transportation (MNDOT) Agreement No. 83861R and authorize the. Mayor and City Manager to sign said agreement. Info /Background: The Minnesota Department of Transportation is proposing to replace the Traffic Signals located at TH100 and West 50th Street / Vernon Avenue. This project is scheduled for a letting date of January 24, 2003. The construction of this project is fully coordinated by the Minnesota Department of Transportation and will occur during the spring and early summer of 2003. Both of these signals include Emergency Vehicle Pre - emption Systems. that will provide emergency vehicles right -of -way during' emergencies. The City of Edina is responsible for 75% of the easterly traffic signal or $143,910.00; this will be funded by gas tax funds appropriated through the Municipal State Aid System. Staff recommends approval of this agreement. RESOLUTION NO. 2002 -88 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING 1t ' Oi 3 <�111a TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL AGREEMENT WITH MN/DOT AT TH100 AND WEST 50TH STREET BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Edina enter into an agreement with the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation for the following purposes, to wit: To remove the existing traffic control signals and install new traffic control signals with street lights, emergency vehicle pre - emption and signing on Trunk Highway No. 100 East Ramps (Grange Road) at West 50`h Street, and on Trunk Highway No. 100 West Ramps at County State Aid Highway No. 158 (West 50`h Street) — County State Aid Highway No. 158 (Vernon Avenue; and install interconnect on County State Aid Highway No. 158 (West 56`h Street)/West 50`h Street from Trunk Highway No. 100 East Ramps (Grange Road) to Trunk Highway No. 100 West Ramps in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth and contained in Agreement No. 83861R, a copy of which was before the Council. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the proper City officers be and hereby are authorized to execute such agreement and any amendments, and thereby assume for an on behalf of the City, all of the contractual obligations contained therein. ATTEST: City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA )SS CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of October 15, 2002, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of ,20 City Clerk City Hall (952) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (952) 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (952) 826 -0379 r j MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL AGREEMENT NO. 83861R BETWEEN THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE CITY OF EDINA TO Remove the existing Traffic Control Signals and Install new Traffic Control Signals with Street Lights, Emergency Vehicle Pre - emption and Signing on Trunk Highway No. 100 East Ramps (Grange Road) at West 50th Street, and on Trunk Highway No. 100 West Ramps at County State Aid Highway No. 158 (West 50th Street) - County State Aid Highway No. 158 (Vernon Avenue); and Install Interconnect on County State Aid Highway No. 158 (West 50th Street) /West 50th Street from Trunk Highway No. 100 East Ramps (Grange Road) - to . -Trunk - Highway _No . __100 West Ramps _ in_ Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota. S.P. 2734 -39 S.A.P. 27- 758 -05 and 120 - 141 -009 Prepared by Traffic Engineering ESTIMATED AMOUNT RECEIVABLE AMOUNT ENCUMBERED County of Hennepin $ 97,470.00 City of Edina $143,910.00 None Otherwise Covered 1 PARTIES THIS AGREEMENT is entered into by the Minnesota Department of Transportation, (State), and the County of Hennepin, (County), and the City of Edina, (City). RECITALS Minnesota Statutes Section 161.20 authorizes the Commissioner of Transportation to enter into agreements with any governmental authority for the purposes of constructing, maintaining and improving the Trunk Highway system. The State has determined that there is justification and it is in the public's best interest to remove the existing traffic control signals and install new traffic control signals including street lights and signing, (Traffic Control Signal(s)) on Trunk Highway No. 100 East Ramps (Grange Road) at West 50th Street, and on Trunk Highway No. 100 West Ramps at County State Aid Highway No. 158 (West 50th Street) - County State Aid Highway No. 158 (Vernon Avenue); and install traffic signal interconnect, (Interconnect) on County State Aid Highway No. 158 (West 50th Street) /West 50th Street from Trunk Highway No. 100 East Ramps (Grange Road) to Trunk Highway No. 100 West Ramps. The City requests and the State agrees to the installation of Emergency Vehicle Pre - emption Systems, (EVP 83861R -1- System(s)), as a part of the new Traffic Control Signal installations. It is considered in the public's best interest for the State to provide a master controller and two new cabinets and control equipment to operate the new Traffic Control Signals. The County, City and the State will participate in'the cost, maintenance and operation of the new Traffic Control Signals, EVP Systems, and Interconnect. 1. The State will prepare the necessary plan, specifications and proposal, (Preliminary Engineering). The State will also perform all necessary construction inspection, (Engineering and Inspection). 2. The Cost of Construction, (Construction Cost) consists of the contract cost of the work or, if the work is not contracted, the actual cost of all labor, materials, and equipment rental required to complete the work. Construction Cost does not include the cost of providing the power supply to the service poles or pads. 3. The State, with its own resources or by contract, will perform the Traffic Control Signal, the EVP System and Interconnect work pursuant to State Project No. 2734 -39 and 83861R -2- State Aid Project No.'s 27- 758 -05 and 120 - 141 -009 with the Construction Costs shared as follows: a. Trunk Highway No. 100 East Ramps (Grange Road) at West 50th Street. System "A ". Traffic Control Signal and EVP System. Estimated Construction Cost is $172,000.00 which includes State - furnished Materials. State's share is 25 percent. City's share is'75 percent. b. Trunk Highway No. 100 West Ramps at County. State Aid Highway No. 158 (West 50th Street) - County State Aid Highway No. 158 (Vernon Avenue). System "B ". Traffic Control Signal and EVP System. Estimated Construction Cost is $172,000.00 which includes State - furnished Materials. State's share is 50 percent. County's share is 50 percent. C. On County State Aid Highway No. 158 (West 50th Street) /West 50th Street from Trunk Highway No. 100 East Ramps (Grange Road) to Trunk Highway No. 100 West Ramps. Interconnect. Estimated Construction Cost is $17,000.00 which includes State - furnished 83861R -3- . Materials. State's share is 50 percent. County's share is 25 percent. City's share is 25 percent. 4 Upon execution of this agreement and receipt of State's written request, the County and City will make an advance payment to the State of their project costs. The County's and City's project costs will be the sum of the following: a. The County's and City's share (as specified in Paragraph 3) based on the actual bid prices and the estimated State - furnished material costs. b. Eight percent of their share [Item (a) above] for the cost of Engineering and Inspection. 5 Upon completion and final State acceptance of the project, the County's and City's final project costs will be the sum of the following: a. The County's and City's share (as specified in Paragraph 3), based on the actual Construction Cost and the actual State- furnished material costs. 83861R -4- b. Eight percent of their final share (Item (a) above] for the cost of Engineering and Inspection. If the amount of the funds advanced by a party exceeds the party's final project costs, the excess will be promptly returned to the party without interest. If the amount of funds advanced by a party is less than the party's final project costs, the party will promptly pay the balance to the State. 6 The City will be responsible for the cost and application to secure an adequate power supply to the service pads or poles. Upon completion of this project, the City will thereafter pay all monthly electrical service expenses necessary to operate the Traffic Control Signals, Interconnect and EVP Systems. 7. Upon completion of this project, the City will, at its cost and expense: (1) maintain the luminaires and all its components, including replacement of the luminaire if necessary; and (2) relamp the new traffic control signals and street lights; and (3) clean and paint the new traffic control signals, cabinets and luminaire mast arm extensions. The State will, at its cost and expense, maintain the signing and interconnect.and perform all other traffic control signal and street light maintenance. 83861R -5 8. The EVP Systems will be installed, operated, maintained, or removed in accordance with the following conditions and requirements: a) All maintenance of the EVP Systems must be done by State forces. b) Emitter units may be installed only on authorized emergency vehicles, as defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 169.01, Subdivision 5. Authorized emergency vehicles may use emitter units only when responding to an emergency. The City will provide the State's Assistant Division Engineer or his /her designated representative a list of all vehicles with emitter units. c) Malfunction of the EVP Systems must be reported to the State immediately. d) In the event the EVP Systems or its components are, in the opinion of the State, being misused or the conditions set forth in Paragraph b above are violated, and such misuse or violation continues after the City receives written notice from the State, the State may remove the EVP Systems. Upon 83861R -6- removal of the EVP Systems pursuant to this Paragraph, all of its parts and components become the property of the State. e) All timing of the EVP Systems will be determined by the State. 9. In the event the State advertises for bids for all.or a portion of the work in-Paragraph 3, the State will submit to the Hennepin County engineer a certified copy of the low bid received and an abstract of all -bids received by the State, together with the State's request for concurrence by the County in the Award of a construction contract. Award of the contract will not be made until the County Engineer advises the State in writing of its concurrence. 10. Final plans and specifications for construction of the traffic control signal work provided in Paragraph 3 will have County approval prior to award of construction contract by the State. Said County approval will be evidenced by signature of the County Engineer in the designated space therefore on the original plan. 11. The construction work provided for herein will be under the direction and supervision of the State. It is agreed, however, that the County will have the right to periodically inspect the cost sharing construction work provided for in Paragraph 3. The State will have the exclusive right to 83861R -7- determine whether the work has been satisfactorily performed by the State's Contractor. 12. The State will insert in any contract with the successful bidder a clause requiring the successful bidder to hold the County and City harmless and also clauses requiring the successful bidder to provide and maintain insurance, all as follows: a) The Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the County and City, their officials, officers, agents, volunteers, and employees from any liability, claims, causes of action, judgments, damages, losses, costs, or expenses, including reasonable attorneys, fees, resulting directly or indirectly from any act or omission of the Contractor, its subcontractors, anyone directly or indirectly employed by them, and/or anyone for whose acts and /or omissions they may be liable in the performance of the services required by this Contract, and against all loss by reason of injuries or damages received or sustained by a person, persons, or property on account of the operations of the Contractor or any 83861R -8- subcontractor or their agents or employees; or on account of or in consequence of any neglect in safeguarding the work; or through use of unacceptable materials in constructing the work; or because of any environmental damage or hazardous material damage caused by or resulting from the Contractor's activities; or because of any act or omission, neglect, or misconduct of the Contractor; or because of any claims arising or amounts recovered from infringements of patent, trademark, or copyright; or because of any claims arising or amounts recovered under the Worker's Compensation Act; or under any other law, ordinance, order or decree, or due to the failure of the.Contractor to perform fully, in any respect, all obligations under this Contract. b) In order to protect itself and Hennepin County the Contractor will at all times during the term of this Contract, and beyond such term when so required, have and keep in force the following insurance coverages: 83861R -9- 1. Commercial General Liability on an occurrence basis with Contractual Liability and Explosion, Collapse,'and Underground Property Damage (XCU) Liability coverages: - General Aggregate Limit $1,000,000 - Products -- Completed Operations Aggregate Limit $1,000,000 - Personal and Advertising Injury Aggregate Limit $1,000,000 - Each Occurrence - Combined Bodily Injury and Property Damage Limit $1,000,000 2. Automobile Liability - Combined single limit each occurrence coverage for bodily injury and property damage covering owned, non - owned, and hired automobiles. Limit $1,000,000 83861R -10- 3. Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability: (A) Workers' Compensation Limit - per Minnesota Statutes. If the Contractor is based outside the State of Minnesota, coverage must apply to Minnesota laws., (B) Employer's Liability. Bodily injury by: Accident - Each Accident $100,000 Disease - Policy Limit $500,000 Disease - Each Employee $100,000 c) An umbrella or.excess policy over primary liability insurance coverages is an acceptable method to provide the required insurance limits. The above subparagraphs establish minimum insurance requirements. It is the sole responsibility of the Contractor to determine the need for and to procure additional insurance which may be needed in connection with this contract. Copies of insurance policies will be submitted to the County upon written request. 83861R -11- d) The Contractor will:not commence work until the Contractor has obtained required insurance and filed with the County a properly executed and acceptable Certificate of Insurance which clearly evidences all required insurance coverages. The certificate will name Hennepin County as certificate holder, and will also name Hennepin County and the City as additional insureds for the Commercial General Liability coverage with respect to operations covered under the Contract. The certificate should also show that Hennepin County will receive 30 days' prior written notice in the event of cancellation, nonrenewal, or material change in any described policies.. The Contractor will furnish to the County updated certificates during the term of the Contract as insurance policies expire. If the Contractor fails to furnish proof of insurance coverage, the County through the State may cause payments to be withheld from the Contractor, and /or may pursue any other 83861R -12- right or remedy allowed under the Contract, law, equity, and /or statute. e) The County agrees to pay to the State the total amount of the liability insurance coverage premium costs, described herein, incurred by the State's Contractor for State Project No. 2734 -39 in procuring and maintaining for the duration of the Contractor's contractual obligation to said State project. As such time, be it one or more, as the said State's Contractor furnishes the State with a certified statement of the insurance premium costs the Contractor has incurred on procuring.the aforesaid insurance coverage, the State will invoice the County for the total amount of the insurance premium costs set forth in said certified statement from the Contractor, and the County will, upon receipt of said invoice, promptly make payment thereof to the State. 13. Each party will be solely responsible for its own acts and omissions, and the results thereof, to the extent authorized by law. The State's liability is governed by the 83861R -13- Minnesota Tort Claims Act, Minnesota Statutes Section 3.736. Each party will be solely responsible for its own employees for any Workers Compensation Claims. 14. All timing of the new Traffic Control Signals will be determined by the State, and no changes may be made except with the approval of the State. 15. Upon execution and approval by the County, the City and the State and completion of the construction work provided for herein, this agreement will supersede and terminate Agreement No. 57039, dated June 1, 1972, between the parties. 16. Any amendment to this Agreement must be in writing and will not be effective until it has been executed and approved by the same parties who executed and approved the original Agreement, or their successors in office. 17. If the State fails to enforce any provisions of this Agreement, that failure does not waive the provision or its right to enforce it. 18. This Agreement contains all negotiations and agreements between the parties. No other understanding regarding this Agreement, whether written or oral, may be used to bind either party. 19. Minnesota law governs this contract. Venue for all legal proceedings arising out of this Agreement, or its 83861R -14- 0 breach, must be in the appropriate state or federal court with competent jurisdiction in Ramsey County, Minnesota. 20. This Agreement is effective on the date the State obtains all required signatures under Minnesota Statutes 16C.05, Subdivision 2, and will remain in effect until terminated by written agreement of the parties. 21. The State's obligation to perform any work, or to let a Contract for the performance of the work, on the State Project referenced above, is subject to the availability of funding from the Minnesota Legislature or other funding source. 83861R -15- COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ATTEST: By: Deputy /Clerk of the County Board Date: APPROVED AS.TO FORM: By: Assistant County Attorney Date: APPROVED AS TO EXECUTION: By: Assistant County Attorney Date: (County Seal) By: Chair of its County Board Date: And: Assistant /Deputy /County Administrator Date: And: Assistant County Administrator, Public Works and County Engineer Date: RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: By: Director, Transportation Department Date: This.certifies that the signatories for the County have lawful authority, by virtue of board resolution, to bind the County to the terms of this Agreement. 83861R -16- T CITY OF EDINA RECOMMEND FOR APPROVAL: By: City Attorney Mayor DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RECOMMENDED'FOR APPROVAL: Assistant Division Engineer COMMISSIONER OF ADMINISTRATION As delegated to Materials Management Division By: Date: 1 • (City.Seal) By: City Manager Date: DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION By: Assistant Commissioner Date: ATTORNEY GENERAL As to form and execution By: Date: Date: 83861R -17- oe v � AGENDA ITEM: V. H. SET PUBLIC HEARING -VACATION OF EASEMENT, LOT 3, BLOCK 1, ARROWHEAD POINTE (NOVEMBER 19, 2002) Z No packet data 1-1 Oral presentation �❑ Information coming REPORURECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: Wayne Houle, PE , ,,,bD� City Engineer (� Date: October 15, 2002 Subject: Authorizing Special Assessment Levies for: • Sidewalk Imp. No. S082 - 5615 Woodcrest Drive • Curb & Gutter Imp. No. B100: 4511 Lakeview Drive Recommendation: Agenda Item # y. i. Consent Information Only Mgr. Recommends Action ❑ To H RA ® To Council ❑ Motion ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Authorize Special Assessment Levies for Sidewalk Improvement No. S682 - 5615 Woodcrest Drive and Curb & Gutter Improvement No. B100: 4511 Lakeview Drive. Info /Background: The above two projects were ordered by the Edina City Council on October 16, 2001 and May 7, 2002, respectively. Both of the property owners have waived their rights to a Final Assessment Hearing to assess for the work performed under Minnesota State Statue — Chapter 429 and have also agreed to pay a not to exceed sum. Attached are original report and recommendations, waiver letters, and Analysis of Assessments for these projects. Staff recommends authorizing the levies of these assessments. CITY OF EDINA ANALYSIS OF ASSESSMENT FOR: CURB & GUTTER - B100 LOCATION: 4511 Lakeview Drive CONTRACTOR: ASPHALT PAVING ENGINEERING ENGINEERING 13% CLERICAL 2% CLERICAL PUBLISHING & SUPPLIES: PUBLISHING & SUPPLIES CAPITALIZED INTEREST: FROM: August 14, 2002 $ TO: October 15, 2002 1 ASSESSABLE LOTS 62 DAYS @ TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST: 4,131.62 Storm Sewer Repair ASSESSABLE UNITS: 4511 Lakeview Drive ASSESSABLE COST: 4511 Lakeview Drive $ 8,511.00 1,106.43 170.22 250.00 1.52 PER DAY 93.97 $ 10.131.62 1 ASSESSABLE LOTS 6,000.00 4,131.62 Storm Sewer Repair ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT - $ 6,000.00 PER LOT PROPOSED ASSESSMENT - $ 6,000.00 PER LOT TOTAL ASSESSABLE COST $ 10,131.62 w ° e REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: Wayne Houle, PE City Engineer Date: May 7, 2002 Subject: Order Curb and Gutter Improvement B -100: 4511 Lakeview Drive Recommendation: Agenda Item # rv. B. Consent Information Only Mgr. Recommends Action Order Sidewalk Improvement Project B =100; 4511 Lakeview Drive. Info /Background: El ❑ To HRA ® To Council ❑ Motion ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance F-1 Discussion Attached is a letter from Mr. and Mrs. Dulas, 4511 Lakeview Drive stating to waive their rights to a Public Hearing to assess the curb and gutter improvement costs under Minnesota State Statute — Chapter 429, and also waiving their rights to a Final Assessment Hearing and agreeing to pay a sum not to' exceed $6000.00. Also attached is the original petition and the Report /Recommendation receiving the petition during the summer of 2002. Curb and gutter currently exists along Lakeview Drive and portions of St. John Avenue. This project is feasible and Staff would recommend ordering the project. January 22 2002 City Of EC�111� Timothy J. & Kim M. Dulas 4511 Lakeview Drive Edina, MN 55424 RE: Curb and Gutter Installation Approval Dear Mr. & Mrs. Dulas: This letter is written in regards to the petition submitted to install concrete curb and gutter located along the westerly property line of 4511 Lakeview Drive — Improvement No. B -100. Since this petition has 100 percent approval of the resident requesting concrete curb and gutter installation the City of Edina requests the following: 1. Waive your rights to a Public Hearing to special assess these added improvements as called for in Minnesota -State. Statute - Chapter 429. 2. Waive your rights to a Final Assessment Hearing, but agreeing to pay over a 10 -year period to include amortized interest on the unpaid balance a,sum not to exceed $6000.00. Attached is a typical repayment schedule. Please sign below if you agree to the above statement and return in the .enclosed envelope. This issue will then be brought before the Edina City Council for approval. If you. have any questions or need additional information please call me at 952 - 826 -0443. Sincerely, " Wayne D. Houle, PE Director of Public Works / City Engineer Kim M. Dulas City Hall (952) 927 -8861 , ,cI cnTu GTDFCT FAX (952) 826 -0390 To: Mayor & City Council From: ebra Mangen City Clerk Date: July. 17,1002 Subject: Receive petition .. 1 REPORT/RECOMMENDATION Agenda Item # V.A. Consent Information Only El Mgr. Recommends. El To HRA To Council Action ® Motion Resolution Ordinance . Discussion Recommendation Refer the petition received to Engineering for processing as to feasibility- Info/Background: C . The City. received a petition Kim and Timothy e s� Lakeview. Drive. requesting 4511 l procedure is to. refer installation of curb and gutter . on their property. ty •s . norma the petition to the Engineering Department for processing as to. feasibility. i. City of Edina, Minnesota CITY COUNCIL, 4801 West 50th Street *. Edina, b inneso 655124- 5461 -TDD (612) 927 -5861 9 (612) 927- 7645-FAX ( ) PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL n ... �. owviNr ❑ WATERMAIN DATE: ❑ SIDEWALK ORM SEWER ❑ALLEY (] SANITARY SEWER ?�C�B AND GUTTER ONLY E] PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER ❑ STREET LIGHTING ❑ OTHER: To the Mayor and City Council: o have signed-this Petition ask the-City Council to consider the improvements listed above to The persons wh . the locations listed.below. > �I, ka N y s,nd between ADDRESS ADDRESS LOCATION OF JWROVE T BY STREET AM and between ADDRESS ADDRESS LOCA N OF TIO I�►gROVEMENT BY STREET NAM and between DDRESS ADDRESS A LOCATION OF 11VIPROVEI�NT HY STREET NAME E Slid between ADDRESS ADDRESS LOCATION OF II�ROVENff.NT 13Y STREET NA11Z 1$E PERSONS'WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PE UNDERSTAND AGAINST THE IMPORTANT NOTE MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS THE CITY COUNCIL BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE PRO COUNCIL AS AU HORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, NIINNESOTA S C PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNER'S ONE VtOPERTY SIGNATURE OWNER S NAME (PRINTED) ;k// �n N - -b u1aS — % r•,., PH�Sa7 l -r-�-? -� This petition was circulated by: .)�. -7 z�- _ i S -S �� y s iI L �� E, iJ i E 1.•� 1 PHONE i -mac'' �'J ADDRESS NAIVE �a, attach extra rages. reai 10 There is space for more signatures on the back or you may FOR: LOCATION: CONTRACTOR: ENGINEERING CLERICAL PUBLISHING & SUPPLIES: CAPITALIZED INTEREST: TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST: ASSESSABLE UNITS ASSESSABLE COST: CITY OF EDINA ANALYSIS OF ASSESSMENT SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT - S82 5615 Woodcrest Drive THOMAS & SONS CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING 13% 2% CLERICAL PUBLISHING & SUPPLIES FROM: June 13, 2002 TO: October 15, 2002 124 DAYS @ 5615 Woodcrest Drive 5615 Woodcrest Drive 0.4 PER DAY 1 ASSESSABLE LOTS ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT - $ PROPOSED ASSESSMENT - $ TOTAL ASSESSABLE COST 2,262.50 294.13 45.25 250.00 49.60 2.901.48 2,400.00 501.48 Public Works 2,400.00 PER LOT 2,400.00 PER LOT $ 2,901.48 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: Wayne Houle, PE Assistant Public Works Dir. Date: October 16, 2001 Subject: Order Sidewalk Improvement S -082: 5615 Woodcrest Drive Recommendation: Agenda Item # VI. H. Consent Information Only Mgr. Recommends Action Order Sidewalk Improvement Project S- 082,, 561-5- Woodcrest Drive. Info /Background: ❑ To HRA ® To Council ❑ Motion ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance F-1 Discussion Attached is a letter from Mr. and Mrs. Hann, 5615 Woodcrest Drive stating to waive their rights to a Public Hearing to assess the sidewalk replacement costs under Minnesota State Statute — Chapter 429, and also waiving their rights to a Final Assessment Hearing and agreeing to pay a sum not to exceed $2,400. Also attached is the original petition and a letter from Mr. Hann. The boulevard sidewalk located at 5615 Woodcrest Drive is in need of replacement due to settling of the panels. This project is feasible and Staff would recommend ordering the project. Y CHARLES & MARGARETTE HANN July 26, 2001 The Mayor and City Council City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 5615 WOODCREST DRIVE EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 Dear Mr. Mayor and Council Members: with the I have discussed the dangerous condition of the Public sidewalk En Bering Departmenin front of our the basis head of the Public Works Department and the staff of the g of their review of the matter, we have been directed L Hann, is the trustee- sending The property to submit the attached is owned by a family trust of which my wife, M ar g -In support-Of the Petition, we are sending this letter as a means of providing additional information. The condition of the sidewalk is due to excessive unevenness � efo of the concrete al��g bye he roots combination of settling (the area was developed on of the trees originally Planted on the public land between the sidewalk and the street. Our concern is the risk of possible tripping and falling by a user of the sidewalk. the cost of improvements on public It is our understanding that, in accordance with City oowmers. ether it is determined by the land is to be borne by the benefiting private property arty that a number of property owners benefit, or that ours is the only property benefiting, we have no objection to bearing part or all of the cost of the sidewalk repair or replacement. Our sole concern is the hazard, which we think must be eliminated. With respect to the process of getting the work done, it is our understanding i t the City does projects such as this one. If this is the case, I have a not routinely undertake small improvement suggestion, which I have proposed as an alternative to the staffof he Engineering g byes Depart I gg have offered to arrange to get the work done in accordance procedures, roved contractor and in compliance with the City's specifications for public sidewalks, without approved involvement by City departments: any significant time improvement, irrespective of how the work gets done, we request With respect to paying for the ' The Mayor and City Council, City of Edina July 26, 2001 that the City pay the contractor and cause an assessment to be made against the benefiting private property -so that the work plus financing costs, can be paid for by the property owner over a period of years. We request your favorable consideration of this Petition. Thank you. Very truly yours, Charles Copy: Engineering Department, City of Edina Attachment: Petiti071 to the City Corn'c" September 23, 2001 Charles & Margarette Hann 5615 Woodcrest Drive Edina, MN 55424 RE: Sidewalk replacement Approval Dear Mr. & Mrs. Hann: This letter is written in regards to the petition submitted to replace the concrete sidewalk located at 5615 Woodcrest Drive — Improvement No.S -82. Since this petition has 100 percent approval of the resident requesting concrete sidewalk replacement the City of Edina requests_the following: -aring to special these aded 1. Waive your rights to a Public in improvements as called for i nesota State Statue assess Chaptea429. 2, Waive your rights to a Final Assessment Hearing, but agreeing to pay over a 7 -year period to include amortized .-interest on the unpaid balance a sum not to exceed $2400.00. Attached '.is a typ al repayment schedule. If you agree to the above statemenhw This will be bbought before the Edina myself no later than September 27 uestions or need additional City Council on October 2nd. If you have any q information please call me at 952 - 826 -0443. Sincerely, �/' l wo . /� Wayne D. Houle, PE Assistant Public Works Director N1 rgare a Hann Caries Hann ' City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET ,^ . (952) 927 -88f FAX (952) 826 -03' TDD (952) 826 -03 City of Edina, Minnesota .CITY COUNCIL 4801 West 50th Street - Edina, Minnesota 55424 (612) 927-8861- (612) 927 - 7645 -FAX - (612) 927 - 5461 -TDD DATE: 4 -7 PFTTTTON TO THE CITY COUNCIL SIDEWALK ❑ ALLEY PAVING ❑ WATERMAIN ❑ STORM SEWER ❑ SANITARY SEWER ❑ STREET LIGHTING ❑ CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ❑ PERMANENT STREET ❑ OTHER: SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER To the Mayor and City Council: The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the locations listed below. 5 1. 1 tj00 C1 C�� }' Drt ve LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME between and ADDRESS between LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME between TION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME and ADDRESS and ADDRESS ADDRESS ADDRESS ADDRESS LOCA _ - and between _ _ _ LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE EMOROMIENTS VVNESOTA STATUTES. DETERN LINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED B PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE This petition was circulated by: NAME OWNER'S NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNER'S (PRINTED) PHONE 1"►�VCl�1re � . 4" *3 5% t S (J uydC tie& Pr ti ADDRESS PHONE There is space for more signatures on the back or you may attach extra pages. SEPTEMBER 19GO r; o e TO: MAYOR & COUNCIL FROM: MARTY SCHEERER FIRE CHIEF DATE: OCTOBER 15, 2002 SUBJECT: APPENDIX "A" TO HENNEPIN COUNTY RADIO SUBSCRIBER AGREEMENT Info/Background: REPORT/RECOMMENDATION Agenda Item Y.J. Consent ❑ Information Only Mgr. Recommends FI To HRA ® To Council Action ❑ Motion EResolution ❑ Ordinance Discussion At the October 1, 2002 Edina City Council Meeting the City Council approved the Edina Fire Department to participate in the 800 MHz Regional Radio Communications System. Appendix A was inadvertently not included in the City Council packets, attached is the Appendix A. Z Edina Fire Department C11-v of Edliki w % 41 6250 Tracy Avenue 4801 We,l 50Lh 6Lreel �o`` } ' Edina, Mlnne8oLa 55436 -2580 Edina. Mlnne,,�oLa 55424 -1394 p (952) 826-0330 Fax (952) 826-0393 Fax (952) 826-03901 !'lIiFYl1'� It \ October 2, 2002 Mayor and City Council Members City of Edina 4801 West 50`" Street Edina, MN 55424 Mayor and Council, Here is the Appendix A that was not included in your Council Packets from the October 1, 2002 City Council Meeting. The Fire Department is planning on leasing the XTS 5000 Model II. The 5000 series radio is need for the channel capacity required for the ambulances and the ruggedized version because of the harsh environment the radios will be used in. The model II is needed because it displays the channel, the battery status and the caller ID. The lease price will be $738.19 /year. That includes an interest charge of $62.93 /year, a Metro Radio Board fee of $46.00 /year and a Subscriber Fleet Support fee of 164.44 /year. If you have any questions, please call me at 952 - 826 -0332. Sincerely, Marty Scheerer, Fire Chief City of Edina Fire Department . I I w 4 V Hennepin County Sheriffs Office Communications System Subscriber Agreement Appendix A 6/19/02 2003 800 MHz Radio Lease Rates for Cities and Non - County Agencies That Have Radios That are Ordered Under the Motorola 02 Promotional Discount* XTS 5000 Model 1 Contract 02 Price with Lease • Lease Discount Discount Radio Purchase Discount Trade In Term (Contract Lease -No Lease With XTS 5000 Model II Price" Price Credit (Years) Price) Trade -in Trade -in XTS 2500 Model 1 $1,876.76 $1,340.76 $1,190.76 7 $541.48 $464.91 $443.48 XTS 2500 Model II $2,284.76 $1,748.76 $1,598.76 7 $599.76 $523.19 $501.76 XTS 2500 Model III $2,556.76 $2,020.76 $1,870.76 7 $638.62 $562.05 $540.62 XTS 5000 Model 1 $2,879.76 $2,474.40 $2,224.40 7 $684.76 $626.86 $591.14 XTS 5000 Model I (Ruggedized) $3,049.76 $2,544.40 $2,294.40 7 $709.05 $636.86 $601.14 XTS 5000 Model II $3,083.76 $2,831.40 $2,581.40 7 $713.91 $677.86 $642.14 XTS 5000 Model II (Encrypted) $3,823.60 $3,571.24 $3,321.24 7 $819.60 $783.55 $747.83 XTS 5000 Model II (Ruggedized) $3,253.76 $2,901.40 $2,651.40 7 $738.19 $687.86 $652.14 XTS 5000 Model III $3,287.76 $3,051.72 $2,801.72 7 $743.05 $709.33 $673.62 XTS 5000 Model III (Encrypted) $4,027.60 $3,791.56 $3,541.56 7 $848.74 $815.02 $779.31 XTS 5000 Model III (Ruggedized) $3,457.76 $3,121.72 $2,871.72 7 $767.34 $719.33 $683.62 Spectra W3 Remote $3,578.00 $3,334.60 $3,084.60 10 $631.17 $606.83 $581.83 Spectra W3 Remote (Encryp.) $4,311.72 $4,068.32 $3,818.32 10 $704.54 $680.20 $655.20 Spectra W4 Dash Mount $2,927.00 $2,709.00 $2,459.00 10 $566.07 $544.27 $519.27 Spectra W4 Dash Mt. (Encryp.) $3,660.72 $3,442.72 $3,192.72 10 $639.44 $617.64 $592.64 Spectra W4 Remote Mount $3,129.00 $2,910.96 $2,660.96 10 $586.27 $564.47 $539.47 Spectra W4 Rem. Mt. (Encryp.) $3,862.72 $3,644.68 $3,394.68 10 $659.64 $637.84 $612.84 Spectra W7 Dash Mount $3,151.00 $2,952.44 $2,702.44 10 $588.47 $568.61 $543.61 Spectra W7 Dash Mt. (Encryp.) $3,884.72 $3,686.16 $3,436.16 10 $661.84 $641.99 $616.99 Spectra W7 Remote Mount $3,353.00 $3,154.40 $2,904.40 10 $608.67 $588.81 $563.81 Spectra W7 Rem. Mt. (Encryp.) $4,086.72 $3,888.12 $3,638.12 10 $682.04 $662.18 $637.18 Spectra W9 Remote Mount $3,578.00 $3,194.52 $2,944.52 10 $631.17 $592.82 $567.82 Spectra W9 Rem. Mt. (Encryp.) $4,311.72 $3,928.24 $3,678.24 10 $704.54 $666.19 $641.19 Desktop -local $5,033.00 N/A N/A 10 $776.67 N/A N/A Desktop -local (Encrypted) $5,788.30 N/A N/A 10 $852.20 N/A N/A Desktop- remote $4,880.40 N/A N/A 10 $761.41 N/A N/A Desktop- remote (Encrypted) $5,635.70 N/A N/A 10 $836.94 N/A N/A * These rates are only for the specific models at the prices listed. Lease rates will be adjusted to reflect the cost of the radio at the time of purchase or to Include new models not listed. Rates include an interest cost of $62.93 per radio per year for the term of the lease. Total interest cost for the lease is $440.51 for portables and $629.30 for mobiles and consolettes. 2003 rates include a Metro Radio Board Fee of $46 and a Subscriber Fleet Support Fee of $164.44 *" Does not include accessories. Includes extended service plan from Motorola ($36 for XTS2500, $41 for XTS5000, $49 for Mobiles) Includes Tier I maintenance. Fee based on units purchased with the optional Motorola extended service plan. DISCLAIMER: These discount rates do not apply to cities and other non - county agencies that do not have radio orders placed with Sheriffs Communications by 7/1/02 �ZN A, owe, O REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor and Council Agenda Item # VI. K Consent From: Craig Larsen, City Planner Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Date: October 15, 2002 ® ❑ To Council Action Motion Subject: TEA - 21 ® El, Resolution Grant Application 9 ❑ Ordinance Discussion Recommendation: Approve Resolution authorizing Grant application to Metropolitan Council. Info /Background: Staff is seeking Council permission to make application for a grant to implement a bus circulator system in the greater Southdale /Centennial Lakes area.. The grant would fund a two -year demonstration program. If successful, it would be our hope that Metro Transit would operate the service on a permanent basis. Applications are due on November 1, with funding announcement in March 2003. This application is similar to an application made one year ago. That application was not funded. a O e Cn \N�b te8ee�/ REPORT /RECOMMENDATION TO: Mayor & City Council From: Wayne D. Houle, PE I,&I� �° City Engineer Date: October 15, 2002 Subject: Change Order No. 1 Building Demolition — 4701 West 50th Street Recommendation: Agenda Item # V. L. Consent Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ® Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Authorize Change Order No. 1 for asbestos cleanup during the demolition of the old Hennepin County Library building. a Info /Background: Asbestos was found below the concrete slab during the demolition of the old Hennepin County Library. building. This asbestos was not part of the previous asbestos abatement project. This change order will increase the quote amount more than ten percent, therefore requiring City Council to approve this change order. The total increase of this change order is $12,185.00. The quote for _demolition of the building is $31,260.00. This project is funded through City Hall reconstruction fund. Staff recommends approving this change order. .� law FINAL PAYMENT 50639 548841 4606.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT R55CKRE6 LOG20000 20,329.00 CITY OF EDINA 238763 1013102 Council Check Register 102403 AAA LAMBERTS LANDSCAPE PRODUCT 9/27/02 - 1013/02 DIRT. SOD Check # Date Amount Vendor/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 238760 9127/02 6987 100686 CITY OF EDINA PAYROLL ACCOUNT GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 281.99 430,000.00 9/27 PAYROLL 50443 9127 PAYROLL 9900.1010 CASH TREASURER'S 238764 1013102 430,000.00 238761 9130102 409.48 101803 CITY OF BURNSVILLE 50284 067556-00 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 657.41 SALES TAX 50638 967336 4606.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 10,114.00 NARDA MICRO -WAVE FILTERS 50638 967336 4606.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 10,771.41 374.95 MAIL PROCESS 238762 9130102 5910.6103 101910 HTE INC. GENERAL (BILLING) 374.95 10/2/02 14:39:41 Page - 1 Business Unit PAYROLL CLEARING COPS MORE GRANT COPS MORE GRANT 20,329.00 FINAL PAYMENT 50639 548841 4606.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COPS MORE GRANT 20,329.00 238763 1013102 102403 AAA LAMBERTS LANDSCAPE PRODUCT 195.31 DIRT. SOD 50520 6960 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 86.68 DIRT 50521 6987 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 281.99 238764 1013102 101304 ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY 409.48 REPAIR HOSES 50284 067556-00 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 409.48 238765 1013102 100616 ACTION MAILING SERVICES INC. 374.95 MAIL PROCESS 50285 93255 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 374.95 238766 1013102 102626 AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES 1,122.25 READY MIX 50286 96451 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 897.80 READY MIX 50287 96145 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 726.76 READY MIX 50288 95821 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 499.64 READY MIX 50289 95820 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 432.20 READY MIX 50290 95526 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 1,544.36 READY MIX 50291 94947 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 885.73 READY MIX 50378 96991 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 208.69 READY MIX 50411 97242 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 6,317.43 238767 1013102 102609 ALL SAINTS BRANDS 178.00 50333 00007114 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/2102 14:39:41 Council Check Register Page - 2 9/27/02 — 10/3/02 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 31.90 50334 00007116 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 209.90 238768 1013/02 105369 AMCON 13,880.92 TRAINING CENTER 50656 2435 45004.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PUBLIC SAFETY TRAINING FACILIT 13,880.92 238769 1013102 102116 ANCHOR PRINTING CO. 369.40 HOURS CARDS 50522 221379 -01 5610.6575 PRINTING ED ADMINISTRATION 515.46 HOTEL PASSES 50523 221382 -01 5610.6575 PRINTING ED ADMINISTRATION 884.86 238770 1013102 102109 ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER __624.41 2 -WAY RADIO REPAIRS 50524 50988 1553.6237 RADIO SERVICE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 624.41 238771 1013102 106504 ANDERSON ENGINEERING _ 375.40 TRAINING CENTER 50657 946 45004.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PUBLIC SAFETY TRAINING FACILIT 375.40 238772 10/3102 102172 APPERT'S FOODSERVICE 349.09 FOOD 50379 247650 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 8.50- 50380 C41123 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 8.50- 50381 C43053 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 332.09 238773 10/3102 100929 ARCTIC GLACIER INC. 38.50 50444 DB226712 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 102.00 50445 DB226611 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 140.50 238774 1013/02 100256 AT &T WIRELESS 22.56 50382 091702 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 22.56 238775 10/3/02 101954 AUGIE'S INC. 40.56 FOOD 50383 2550 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD RICHARDS GOLF COURSE L j c • CITY OF EDINA 10/2102 14:39:41 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 3 9/27/02 - 10%3/02 Check # Date Amount Vendor/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 40.56 238776 1013102 106497 BAUER BROS. EXTERIORS 6,900.00 SIDING, SOFFIT /FASCIA 50525 092602 2127.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMM DEV BLK GRANT 6,900.00 238777 1013102 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 175.00 50335 24633600 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 560.00 50446 24660700 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 735.00 238778 10/3/02 105833 BERGERSON - CASWELL INC. 11,240.00 WELL MOTOR REPLACEMENT 50292 90950000 5911.6530 REPAIR PARTS PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER 11,240.00 238779 1013/02 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 49.33 OFFICE SUPPLIES 50293 1211760 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 14.48 OFFICE SUPPLIES 50294 1183001 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 149.30 OFFICE SUPPLIES 50295 1213280 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 76.49- OFFICE SUPPLIES 50296 CM9611450 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 2,019.24 PERSONNEL FOLDERS 50297 R340160 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 90.19 OFFICE SUPPLIES 50412 1202900 1628.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 459.99 OFFICE SUPPLIES 50526 1225390 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 27.31 SHEARS, APPT. BOOK 50527 1216060 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 2,733.35 238780 1013102 104971 BKV GROUP 48,959.81 DESIGN 50658 20159 4400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CITY HALL/POLICE BUILDING 48,959.81 238781 1013102 103866 BLALOCK, KAREN 25.32 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 50640 092602 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 25.32 238782 10/3102 101176 BLEDSOE, SARA 25.94 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 50641 092602 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 25.94 238783 10/3/02 100711 BLOOD, DAVID 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 50369 100302 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/2/02 14:39:41 Council Check Register Page - 4 9/27/02 - 10/3/02 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 100.00 238784 10/3102 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 329.15 SOLENOID KIT 50528 430705 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 329.15 238785 1013102 100663 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE 22.31 PETTY CASH 50529 092602 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 26.61 PETTY CASH 50529 092602 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 39.74 PETTY CASH 50529 092602 5410.6235 POSTAGE GOLF ADMINISTRATION 88.66 238786 10/3/02 100667 BROCK WHITE COMPANY 26.87 SPRAYER NOZZLES 50530 EG17281401 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN _ 526.41 SONOLASTIC, VULKEM 50531 EG17374601 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET REVOLVING 553.28 238787 1013/02 106461 BUCHANAN, FLORENCE 564.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 50298 092402 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 564.00 238788 10/3/02 100776 BUTLER, GEORGE 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 50367 100302 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 238789 1013102 106498 CALTON DESIGN INC. 132.67 SOLDERING IRON, HEAT CONTROL 50533 20207 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 132.67 238790 1013102 100678 CARLSON PRINTING 59.64 BUSINESS CARDS 50299 00080006 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 81.47 BUSINESS CARDS 50300 00080000 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 141.11 238791 10/3/02 100679 CARLSON TRACTOR & EQUIPMENT - 28.58 SPRING PINS 50532 1036219 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 28.58 238792 10/3102 106466 CARROT -TOP INDUSTRIES INC. 305.75 FLAGPOLE 50413 271499 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE .� r CITY OF EDINA 10/2/02 14:39:41 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 5 9/27/02 - 10/3/02 Check # - -- Date - - -- - - -- Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # -- --- - - - - -- - Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 305.75 238793 1013102 100681 CATCO 38.98 HOSE ENDS 50534 6 -97469 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 18.49 FITTINGS 50535 7 -58511 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 107.95 FITTINGS 50536 1 -83914 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 234.27 FITTINGS 50537 3 -01422 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 20.30 FITTINGS 50538 1 -84850 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 521.55 FITTINGS, HOSE 50539 3 -01931 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 941.54 238794 1013102 102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 158.40 IOMEGA ZIP DRIVE 50540 GT51171 1470.6160 DATA PROCESSING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 158.40 238795 1013/02 106465 CELTIC CAPITAL CORPORATION 394.12 BELDING SPORTS, INC. 50384 391655 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 394.12 238796 10/3102 101515 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS CO. 317.46 SEALER 50541 998163 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 317.46 238797 1013102 105311 CHAMPION AMERICA 30.75 CAPACITY SIGN 50542 R119564 -01 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 30.75 238798 10/3102 100689 CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP. 877.50 SUCTION HOSE 50659 34323 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 877.50 238799 10/3102 102848 CLARK, BRIDGET 39.00 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 50642 092602 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 39.00 238800 10/3102 105316 CLARK, PENNY 104.65 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 50643 092602 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/2/02 14:39:41 Council Check Register Page - 6 9/27/02 — 10/3/02 Check # -- -- - Date - -- - - -- Amount -104.65 Vendor/ Explanation PO # - — -- — -- Doc No -- Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 238801 1013102 101395 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION 391.49 INSPECTIONS 50385 PA000068651 01318.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BA -318 W 77TH ST - PENTAGON PK 391.49 238802 1013102 106495 CONTROLS & METERS INC. 2,893.93 WELL #7 WATER METER 50414 6652 5911.6530 REPAIR PARTS PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER 2,893.93 238803 10/3/02 101704 COOK, BARB 570.00 PROGRAM STAFF 50386 092402 1629.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 570.00 238804 1013102 100698 COPY EQUIPMENT INC. _ 5.22 COPIES 50301 0238951 1495.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSPECTIONS 5.22 238805 1013102 106499 COSTUME RENTALS 48.15 COSTUME RENTAL 50543 5467 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 48.15 238806 10/3102 101948 COUNTRY CLUB TURF 449.38 SOD 50544 1124 5630.6540 FERTILIZER CENTENNIAL LAKES 449.38 238807 1013/02 103514 CROSBIE, SCOTT 92.47 PARADE SUPPLIES 50387 082202 1627.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 92.47 238808 1013102 101418 CUMMINS NPOWER LLC 495.00 GENERATOR REPAIR 50545 100.80279 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 495.00 238809 1013102 100701 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO. 8.50 FUEL FILTER 50302 120170 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 8.50 238810 1013102 100710 DAVE'S DAIRY 219.70 DAIRY 50388 091602 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL �1 1' CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 9/27/02 — 10/3/02 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 219.70 238811 1013102 100712 DAVIES WATER EQUIPMENT 5,085.72 WATER METERS 50415 3137936 5900.1357 INVENTORY WATER METER 5,085.72 238812 1013102 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING 1,577.32 50336 192746 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 36.80 50447 192750 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 699.50 50448 192748 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 2,313.62 238813 1013102 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 44.44 BAKERY 50389 134659 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 64.75 BAKERY 50390 134567 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 109.19 238814 10/3/02 101894 DIAMOND ART & CRAFT DISTRIBUTO 18.75 W/C PALETTE 50546 204848 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 18.75 238815 10/3102 102823 DIRECT SAFETY COMPANY 34.70 SAFETY GLASSES 50417 00184090 5911.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 34.70 238816 10/3102 104460 DNR SIGN SHOP 34.95 WOOD SIGN 50416 001892 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 34.95 238817 10/3102 101691 DON BETZEN GOLF SUPPLY CO. 189.50 CART KEY TAGS 50391 15528 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 189.50 238818 10/3102 100730 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 10,939.60 LEGAL 10,939.60 238819 1013102 100731 DPC INDUSTRIES 10/2/02 14:39:41 Page- 7 Business Unit UTILITY BALANCE SHEET YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING GRILL GRILL ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER PATHS & HARD SURFACE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 50418 992977 1195 6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL LEGAL SERVICES 4,903.59 CHEMICALS 50419 7000 - 1440757 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/2102 14:39:41 Council Check Register Page - 8 9127/02 - 10/3/02 Check # Date Amount Vendor I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 4,903.59 238820 1013/02 100736 E-Z-GO TEXTRON 9.52 CART PARTS 50547 1119605 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF CARS 154.96 REPAIR PARTS 50548 1119619 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF CARS 134.52 CART PARTS 50549 1119554 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF CARS 40.11 CART PARTS 50550 1118792 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF CARS 339.11 238821 1013/02 100739 EAGLE WINE 1,774.88 50449 602482 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,870.93 50450 602661 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,645.81 238822 1013102 100741 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 28.60 50337 298830 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,791.90 50338 298829 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 361.00 50339 300562 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 8,784.60 50340 299406 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 9.80 50341 299404 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 130.00 50342 299405 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 108.00 50392 300673 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 13,213.90 238823 10/3102 106496 ED'S TROPHIES INC. 111.54 AWARD PLAQUES 50552 58835 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 111.54 238824 1013/02 104755 EDGE, THE 341.00 OCT/NOV 50551 091602 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 341.00 238825 10/3102 100744 EDINA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 114.00 TOURNAMENT OVERPAYMENT 50420 092402 5401.4591 GREEN FEES EIGHTEEN HOLES GOLF REVENUES 114.00 238826 10/3102 102865 ELECTION SYSTEMS & SOFTWARE IN 299.83 ELECTION SUPPLIES 50553 491984 1180.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ELECTION r p 10/2/02 14:39:41 Page - 9 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART CENTER REVENUES COMMUNICATIONS ENGINEERING GENERAL 51.48 SHOES 50395 5008838 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 51.48 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/3/02 102077 FRESCO INC. Council Check Register 97.13 _ - -- FORESTRY SUPPLIES 50421 9/27/02 — 10/3/02 1644.6556 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 299.83 238833 10/3/02 238827 10/3102 105758 EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE 116.95 50.99 BULBS 50554 12996 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 279.5_6 AMBER LENSES 50555 13028 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES 330.55 238834 10/3102 106409 GANS, JEFF 238828 10/3/02 106503 ENGEBRETSON, SHIRLEY 1.0_00.00 STORAGE SHED _ 34.13 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 50645 092602 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 34.13 238829 10/3102 238835 105339 ENRGI 105959 GARFIN, JEFF 535.00 WEBSITE DEVELOPMENT 50393 688 2210.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT TRAINING EXPENSES 50660 535.00 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 238830 1013102 103234 FIELDWORKS 141.65 SURVEYTOOL 50394 8029021RI 1260.6577 LUMBER 141.65 238831 10/3102 101475 FOOTJOY 10/2/02 14:39:41 Page - 9 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART CENTER REVENUES COMMUNICATIONS ENGINEERING GENERAL 51.48 SHOES 50395 5008838 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 51.48 238832 10/3/02 102077 FRESCO INC. 97.13 _ - -- FORESTRY SUPPLIES 50421 47863 1644.6556 TOOLS TREES & MAINTENANCE 97.13 238833 10/3/02 102456 GALLS INC. 116.95 CHAPLAIN UNIFORMS 50303 559128690 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 116.95 238834 10/3102 106409 GANS, JEFF 1.0_00.00 STORAGE SHED 50556 987 5130.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS STORAGE SHED 1,000.00 238835 1013102 105959 GARFIN, JEFF 58.25 TRAINING EXPENSES 50660 092702 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/27/02 - 10/3/02 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description r q LAUNDRY GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART WORK SOLD REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 10/2/02 14:39:41 Page - 10 Business Unit BUILDING MAINTENANCE RICHARDS GOLF COURSE ADAPTIVE RECREATION ART CENTER REVENUES CLUB HOUSE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EDINBOROUGH PARK COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 58.25 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 238836 10/3/02 105508 GEMPLER'S INC. 161.80 UNIFORM ITEMS 50422 P07109280001 1646.6201 161.80 238837 1013/02 102250 GIFT BOX CORPORATION OF AMERIC 313.80 BAGS 50396 10919484 5430.6406 313.80 238838 1013102 103316 GOETSCH, SAM L. 270.00 INTERPRETER 50661 092602 1629.6103 270.00 238839 1013102 105317 GOODSPEED, ELNA 45.34 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 50646 092602 5101.4413 45.34 238840 1013102 101103 GRAINGER 53.31 BALLASTS 50304 49560326 -2 5420.6530 49.61 SCALE 50305 495 - 210859 -7 1553.6406 27.73 HARD HAT LINERS 50557 937 -062291 -3 1301.6610 76.09 PAINT, BATTERIES 50558 495 - 062292 -0 1553.6406 78.23 GLOVES, BATTERIES 50559 498 - 879544 -1 5620.6406 284.97 238841 1013/02 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 904.00 50451 49528 5842.5513 866.00 50452 49623 5822.5513 359.00 50453 49566 5862.5513 2,129.00 238842 1013102 100782 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. 5,284.30 50343 599462 5842.5512 740.51 50454 602666 5822.5512 43.65 50455 602665 5822.5515 214.00 50456 602673 5842.5515 r q LAUNDRY GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART WORK SOLD REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 10/2/02 14:39:41 Page - 10 Business Unit BUILDING MAINTENANCE RICHARDS GOLF COURSE ADAPTIVE RECREATION ART CENTER REVENUES CLUB HOUSE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EDINBOROUGH PARK COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING • • 1, R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/2/02 14:39:41 Council Check Register Page - 11 9/27/02 - 10/3/02 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description us mess ni 50457 603056 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1.40 50458 602424 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,015.83 50459 602664 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING .70 50460 602406 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 17.65 50461 591684 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 77.70 50462 602663 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 57.40 50463 602668 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING .70 50464 602405 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,284.48 50465 602670 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 73.79 50466 602671 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 46.15 50467 602669 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 55.85- 50468 596491 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 17.65- 50469 596800 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 38.84- 50470 596804 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 59.00- 50471 596011 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 11,686.92 238843 10/3102 100155 GRITTON, KAY 25.35 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 50647 092602 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 25.35 238844 1013/02 100787 GRUBER'S POWER EQUIPMENT 718.79 BLOWER, HEDGETRIMMER 50662 23988 1470.6556 TOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 718.79 238845 1013/02 100788 HSL MESABI 9,623.76 PLOW BLADES 50423 55135 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 814.30- RETURN 50560 55150 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 8,809.46 238846 1013102 102426 HALE, WILL ' 150.00 PERFORMANCE 10 -10-02 50561 092402 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 150.00 238847 10/3102 102320 HAMCO DATA PRODUCTS 142.60 PAPER 50562 223789 5822.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 142.60 238848 1013102 104723 HANSEN, BILL 390.00 BRICK REPAIR 50663 418044 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 2,167.00 CITY OF EDINA 50377 100302 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL Council Check Register 2,167.00 9/27/02 — 1013/02 1013102 Check # Date Amount Vendor/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 74.95 390.00 50309 092302 5910.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL (BILLING) 238849 1013102 74.95 102301 HARTLAND FUEL PRODUCTS LLC 238855 8,938.73 GAS 50306 480023 1553.6581 GASOLINE 8,938.73 428.13 STRIPING PAINT 50563 57889 238850 1013102 FIELD MAINTENANCE 102190 HAYNES, PATRICIA 428.13 38.68 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 50648 092602 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 38.68 236.88 238851 1013/02 092302 101215 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFI MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE 236.88 717.9_6 AUG. BOOKING FEES 50307 091602 1195.6170 COURT CHARGES 10/3102 717.96 238852 10/3/02 15.86 102460 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 50564 697163 5620.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK 1,774.86 PROPERTY TAXES 50308 092502 1000.1303 DUE FROM HRA 12,848.15 ASSESSMENTS 50308 092502 1503.6915 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 14,623.01 238853 10/3/02 106371 HENNEPIN FACULTY ASSOCIATES 10/2102 14:39:41 Page - 12 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART CENTER REVENUES LEGAL SERVICES GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 2,167.00 MEDICAL DIRECTOR SERVICES 50377 100302 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,167.00 238854 1013102 101281 HERSHEY, JERRY 74.95 REIMBURSEMENT 50309 092302 5910.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL (BILLING) 74.95 238855 1013/02 102484 HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MANUFACTURI 428.13 STRIPING PAINT 50563 57889 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER FIELD MAINTENANCE 428.13 238856 1013102 100808 HORWATH, THOMAS 236.88 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 50424 092302 1644.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE 236.88 238857 10/3102 102114 HUEBSCH 15.86 TOWEL CLEANING 50564 697163 5620.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK CITY OF EDINA 10/2/02 14:39:41 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 13 9/27/02 - 10/3/02 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Descrip0on Business Unit 15.86 238858 1013/02 100811 HYDRO SUPPLY CO 3,756.77 WATER METERS 50310 0022098 -IN 5900.1357 INVENTORY WATER METER UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 3,756.77 238859 10/3/02 101861 J.H. LARSON COMPANY 20.68 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 50425 4303418-01 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 22.35 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 50425 4303418 -01 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 646.77 BULBS 50565 4302865 -01 1375.6530 REPAIR PARTS PARKING RAMP 44.46 LIGHTING 50566 4302846 -01 1375.6530 REPAIR PARTS PARKING RAMP 330.57 LIGHTING 50567 4303209 -01 1322.6530 REPAIR PARTS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 1,064.83 238860 1013/02 101400 JAMES, WILLIAM F 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 50374 100302 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 238861 1013102 102146 JESSEN PRESS 141.83 SKATING LESSON FLYERS 50568 45625 5610.6575 PRINTING ED ADMINISTRATION 141.83 238862 10/3/02 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 525.70 50344 1458048 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,719.00 50345 1458050 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 52.05 50346 1458053 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 938.00 50472 1461222 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 59.60 50473 1461228 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,505.14 50474 1461226 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 772.35 50475 1461224 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,165.65 50476 1461211 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 283.10 50477 1461212 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 569.74 50478 1461214 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 137,19 50479 1461213 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 7,727.52 238863 10/3/02 101072 JOHNSON, WALTER 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 50376 100302 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/2/02 14:39:41 Council Check Register Page - 14 9/27/02 — 10/3/02 Check # Date Amount Vendor/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subiedger Account Description Business Unit 100.00 238864 10/3/02 104331 JOYCE EILERS DESIGNS LLC 84.50 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 50644 092602 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 84.50 238865 10/3/02 105318 JOYELLE, PATRICIA 41.93 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 50649 092602 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 41.93 238866 10/3/02 101414 KAR PRODUCTS 126_25 WASHERS, TERMINAL 50569 230726 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 126.25 238867 1013102 102101 KINKO'S 95.53 MAP BINDING 50426 062200042942 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 95.53 238868 1013102 100846 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO 37.00 50347 341316 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,785.82 50348 341315 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,822.82 238869 10/3102 106462 LAMPE, MARY 542.98 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 50311 092402 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 542.98 238870 10/3102 106463 LANDMARK SPECIALTIES ASI 199.39 LOGO SHIRTS 50312 200728 5822.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 199.39 238871 10/3/02 103441 LAWRENCE, JEANNE 38.35 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 50650 092602 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 38.35 238872 10/3/02 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 95.45 LUBRITEMP 50570 0132539 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN i •, • CITY OF EDINA 10/2/02 14:39:41 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 15 9/27/02 •- 10/3/02 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 95.45 238873 1013102 103993 LE CREUSET OF AMERICA INC. 454.35 50480 1154989 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 454.35 238874 1013102 100853 LEEF SERVICES 40.45 TOWELS 50313 752328 5422.6201 LAUNDRY MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 40.45 238875 10/3102 100425 LEMKE, BARB 250.00 DJ FOR DANCE 50397 092402 1629.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 250.00 238876 1013102 100855 LESCO INC. 78.70 PAINT 50314 1P9920 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 78.70 238877 10002 101843 LONG, JEFF 414.5_6 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 50315 092302 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 414.56 238878 1013102 102828 MAIL HANDLING SERVICES 262.17 POSTCARD MAILING 50664 073980 5913.6575 PRINTING DISTRIBUTION 262.17 238879 1013102 100868 MARK VII SALES 69.85 50349 460700 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,788.90 50350 460699 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,666.40 50351 461003 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 34.90 50352 461005 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 49.20 50353 461004 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,485.53 50354 460698 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 7,094.78 238880 1013/02 102141 MAXFLI GOLF 333.46 GOLF BALLS 50398 5087439 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/27/02 — 10/3/02 Check # Date Amount Vendor I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 333.46 238881 10/3/02 100875 MCCAREN DESIGNS INC. 521.85 PLANTS 50571 21481 5620.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS 521.85 238882 10/3/02 106505 MCNICHOLS CO. 2,427.85 FLOOR GRATES 50665 96200 45005.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 2,427.85 238883 10/3102 101483 MENARDS 41.51 CULVERT PIPE 50572 66520 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 41.51 238884 10/3102 100881 MERFELD, BURT 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 50368 100302 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 100.00 238885 1013102 100882 MERIT SUPPLY 169.76 SCRUBBER PARTS 50573 60171 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 285.03 RED/WHITE PADS, TOWELS 50574 60131 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES __398.60 CLEANERS, PADS 50575 60160 5620.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 853.39 238886 1013102 100891 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. 3,817.65 ASPHALT 50399 70484MB 1314.6518 BLACKTOP 3,817.65 238887 10/3/02 100692 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLING COM 112.40 50355 62565097 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 112.40 238888 10/3102 102106 MILE 450.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATIONS 50576 092602 1190.6104 CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS 450.00 238889 1013/02 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 1,360.00 WATER SERVICE REPAIR 50577 32219 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 10/2/02 14:39:41 Page - 16 EDINBOROUGH PARK COAT FLOOR SURFACE STATION 1 CENTENNIAL LAKES RESERVE PROGRAM ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS CENT SVC PW BUILDING EDINBOROUGH PARK STREET RENOVATION VERNON SELLING ASSESSING DISTRIBUTION CITY OF EDINA 10/2102 14:39:41 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 17 9/27/02 -- 1013102 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 850.00 CURB BOX REPAIR 50578 32218 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 2,210.00 238890 10/3102 102014 MINNESOTA CLAY USA 98.45 CLAY 50579 86676 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 25.85- CREDIT ON ACCT. 50580 86401 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 72.60 238891 10/3102 101674 MINNESOTA DEPT OF COMMERCE 108.31 UNCLAIMED PROPERTY 50666 093002 1001.8060 CASH OVER AND UNDER GENERAL FUND REVENUES 108.31 238892 10/3/02 100903 MINNESOTA ELEVATOR INC 83.77 ELEVATOR SERVICE 50581 100903 5620.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK 83.77 238893 10/3/02 106500 MINNESOTA TURF & GROUNDS FOUND 90.00 WORKSHOP 50582 2084 1643.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS GENERAL TURF CARE 90.00 238894 10/3/02 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER 540.17 BELT DRIVE 50583 0054011 -IN 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 540.17 238895 1013/02 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 1,414.98 IRRIGATION REPAIR 50316 328691 -00 5422.6611 IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,414.98 238896 10/3102 103669 NELSON, PAULA 416.70 GFOA CONFERENCE 50317 092402 1160.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FINANCE 416.70 238897 10/3/02 100724 NISSEN, DICK 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 50373 100302 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 238898 10/3102 101729 NORMAN, POLLY 50.00 ABOUT BUSINESS PHOTOS 50318 092002 2210.6123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/2/02 14:39:41 Council Check Register Page - 18 9/27/02 - 10/3/02 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 50.00 238899 10/3/02 100925 NORTH STAR TURF 130.48 REPAIR PARTS 50427 460710 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 482.40 HYDRAULIC OIL 50584 460986 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 612.88 238900 1013/02 102652 NORTHLAND CHEMICAL CORP. 260.33 DISSOLVE, HIGHLIGHT 50585 064751 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 260.33 238901 10/3/02 100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY 173.70 EASEL EXTENSIONS 50586 27494400 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 494.16 - STUDIO EASELS 50587 27469401 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 667.86 238902 10/3/02 100930 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO. 84.99 TIRES 50319 NW- 79926 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 50.00 TIRES 50588 NW -79995 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 64.26 TIRES 50589 NW -80010 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 45.67 TIRES 50590 NW -79845 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 244.92 238903 1013102 106317 NRG PROCESSING SOLUTIONS LLC 158.36 TREE MULCH 50428 20161 1644.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES TREES & MAINTENANCE 158.36 238904 10/3/02 100567 OAK RIDGE COUNTRY CLUB 130.00 PUTTER 50591 PO 6240 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 130.00 238905 10/3/02 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 57.51 DRILL RENTAL 50429 181672 1646.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 921.98 ROTARY HAMMER 50592 182422 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET REVOLVING 11.36 BULL POINT 50593 182484 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET REVOLVING 57.17 CABLE PULLER, CHAIN 50594 182394 1646.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 216.20 CHAIN SAW 50667 183398 5422.6556 TOOLS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS • , , CITY OF EDINA 10/2/02 14:39:41 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 19 9/27/02 -- 10/3/02 Check # - - -- Date -- _Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # -.. -- - - - - -- Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,264.22 238906 1013102 100939 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC. 133.00 COOKIES 50400 58274923 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 133.00 238907 1013102 102047 PAUL KLITZKE R.P.T. 90.00 PIANO TUNING 50401 114270 5420.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CLUB HOUSE 90.00 238908 1013102 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 1,353.00 50356 0198589 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 306.50 50481 0199075 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,005.30 50482 0199073 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 27.95 50483 0199074 -IN 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,692.75 238909 1013102 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 14.92 50484 34524560 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 83.88 - - 50485 34524559 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 98.80 238910 1013102 100946 PERA _ 39.24 PPEND 9/24/02 50668 093002 1000.2023 P.E.R.A. PAYABLE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 39.24 238911 10/3/02 100946 PERA 75,989.55 PPEND 9/24/02 50669 9/30 1000.2023 P.E.R.A. PAYABLE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 75,989.55 238912 1013102 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 941.05 50357 873991 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 457.80 50358 873990 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 94.60 50486 876391 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,044.26 50487 876388 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 69.75 50488 876381 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,804.80 50489 876382 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 50433 31683 47021.6710 CITY OF EDINA SENIOR CENTER FURNISHING 1,992.00 Council Check Register 238920 10/3102 100968 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 9/27102 — 10/3/02 602662 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description YORK SELLING 569.80 4,412.26 602667 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 238913 10/3/02 102156 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING 7.95 DUM DUMS 50490 1303 5822.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 329.78 50491 1313 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 467.21 50492 1304 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 543.54 50493 859 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 1,348.48 238914 1013102 102748 PIRTEK PLYMOUTH 85.08 REPAIR PARTS 50430 PL19622 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 85.08 238915 1013102 100957 PLANT & FLANGED EQUIPMENT 2,049.06 CHECK VALVE 50431 0032643 -IN 5911.6530 REPAIR PARTS 2,049.06 238916 1013/02 100961 POSTMASTER _ 150.00 BULK PERMIT #376 50432 092502 1550.6235 POSTAGE 150.00 238917 1013/02 100961 POSTMASTER 1,350.00 POSTAGE 50674 093002 5110.6235 POSTAGE 1,350.00 238918 1013/02 100962 PRECISION BUSINESS SYSTEMS 10/2/02 14:39:41 Page - 20 Business Unit 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 292.00 5 TRANSCRIBERS 50670 073920 1550.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 292.00 238919 1013102 105801 PREMIER ELECTRICAL CORP. 1,992.00 PROJECTOR/SCREEN WIRING 50433 31683 47021.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT SENIOR CENTER FURNISHING 1,992.00 238920 10/3102 100968 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 2,355.55 50494 602662 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 631.70 50495 602410 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 569.80 50496 602667 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation 3,557.05 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/27/02 - 10/3/02 PO4 Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 10/2/02 14:39:41 Page- 21 238921 10/3102 103614 PROFESSIONAL PEST CONTROL CO. 213.00 PEST CONTROL 50402 091802 5841.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES YORK OCCUPANCY 213.00 238922 1013102 103094 PROTECTION ONE 124.61 ACCT 12743654 50595 091202 5511.6250 ALARM SERVICE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 124.61 238924 10/3/02 100971 QUALITY WINE 1.12- 50359 169093 -00 5840.4408 TRADE DISCOUNTS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 57.31 50359 169093 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 35.47- 50497 172179 -00 5840.4408 TRADE DISCOUNTS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 3,574.94 50497 172179 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 55.43- 50498 171773-00 5860.4408 TRADE DISCOUNTS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 2,792.00 50498 171773 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 33.07- 50499 172169 -00 5820.4408 TRADE DISCOUNTS 50TH STREET GENERAL 3,340.98 50499 172169 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 13.91- 50500 171660 -00 5820.4408 TRADE DISCOUNTS 50TH STREET GENERAL 1,407.64 50500 171660 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2.72- 50501 171673 -00 5820.4408 TRADE DISCOUNTS 50TH STREET GENERAL 273.84 50501 171673 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 27,57- 50502 171775 -00 5820.4408 TRADE DISCOUNTS 50TH STREET GENERAL 1.390.29 50502 171775-00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 25.21- 50503 172181 -00 5860.4408 TRADE DISCOUNTS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 2,541.40 50503 172181 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 26,32- 50504 171659 -00 5860.4408 TRADE DISCOUNTS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 2,665.49 50504 171659 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 9.60- 50505 171027 -00 5860.4408 TRADE DISCOUNTS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 968.34 50505 171027 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 48.34- 50506 171774 -00 5840.4408 TRADE DISCOUNTS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 2,438.16 50506 171774 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 22,74- 50507 163679 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 22,34- 50508 168262 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 21,126.55 . 238925 1013102 101965 QWEST 58.67 50596 091902 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/2/02 14:39:41 Council Check Register Page - 22 9/27/02 - 10/3/02 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 58.67 238926 10/3/02 103478 OWEST 28.80 50671 092502 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 81.31 50671 092502 1481.6188 TELEPHONE YORK FIRE STATION 91.26 50671 092502 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 136.55 50671 092502 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 177.99 50671 092502 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 193.89 50671 092502 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 215.71 50671 092502 5610.6188 TELEPHONE ED ADMINISTRATION 270.37 50671 092502 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 271.42 50671 092502 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 276.40 50671 092502 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 350.77 50671 092502 5911.6188 TELEPHONE PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER 1,161.12 50671 092502 5932.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL STORM SEWER _ 5,343.14 50671 092502 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 8,598.73 238927 1013102 101111 REED BUSINESS INFORMATION 89.96 AD FOR BID 50597 2149870 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 89.96 AD FOR BID 50598 2142887 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 89.96 AD FOR BID 50599 2136589 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 269.88 238928 1013102 105229 REILING, JUDITH RYAN 40.30 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 50651 092602 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 40.30 238929 10/3102 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 505.88 SALT 50320 00126645 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 110.00 REPAIRS 50600 00126646 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 615.88 238930 1013102 101634 SAINT AGNES BAKING COMPANY 47.08 BAKERY 50403 064417 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 11.75 BAKERY 50601 064570 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 58.83 238931 1013/02 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 124.81 101 - 21373069350 50321 092002 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/27/02 - 10/3/02 Check-#, Date Amount Vendor/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 5101.4413 1646.6577 1646.6577 1646.6406 1646.6577 1646.6406 5130.1705 5130.1705 5130.1705 1646.6577 1330.6406 1470.6104 5610.6136 1419.6102 1343.6533 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD LUMBER LUMBER GENERAL SUPPLIES LUMBER GENERAL SUPPLIES CONSTR. IN PROGRESS CONSTR. IN PROGRESS CONSTR. IN PROGRESS LUMBER GENERAL SUPPLIES 10/2102 14:39:41 Page - 23 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE STORAGE SHED STORAGE SHED STORAGE SHED BUILDING MAINTENANCE TRAFFIC SIGNALS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GUARD RAIL MATERIAL ART WORK SOLD RESERVE PROGRAM BRIDGES GUARD RAILS ART CENTER REVENUES 124.81 238932 10/3102 100125 SCHEEL, WADE _ 26.00 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 50652 092602 26.00 238933 10/3/02 105442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO. 6.27 LUMBER 50434 334515 37.68 LUMBER 50435 334513 279.78 LUMBER 50436 333481 59.27 LUMBER, PRIMER 50437 334514 5.27- CREDIT 50438 65479 106.24 SHED 50602 336375 34.02 SHED 50603 336374 496.17 SHED 50604 335398 465.06 LUMBER 50605 341397 29.83 CAULK 50606 338245 1,509.05 238934 1013102 106506 SCHMIT TOWING INC. 500.00 VEHICLE TOWING 50672 915 STMT 500.00 238935 10/3102 103249 SHANNON, JIM 110.00 PERFORMANCE 10 -3 -02 50607 092402 110.00 238936 1013/02 100834 SHEPARD, JOHN 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 50372 100302 100.00 238937 1013102 100998 SHERWIN WILLIAMS 97.74 PAINT, ROLLERS 50608 3519.2 97.74 238938 1013/02 102871 SILVERS, ROXANNE 45.50 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 50653 092602 5101.4413 1646.6577 1646.6577 1646.6406 1646.6577 1646.6406 5130.1705 5130.1705 5130.1705 1646.6577 1330.6406 1470.6104 5610.6136 1419.6102 1343.6533 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD LUMBER LUMBER GENERAL SUPPLIES LUMBER GENERAL SUPPLIES CONSTR. IN PROGRESS CONSTR. IN PROGRESS CONSTR. IN PROGRESS LUMBER GENERAL SUPPLIES 10/2102 14:39:41 Page - 23 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE STORAGE SHED STORAGE SHED STORAGE SHED BUILDING MAINTENANCE TRAFFIC SIGNALS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GUARD RAIL MATERIAL ART WORK SOLD RESERVE PROGRAM BRIDGES GUARD RAILS ART CENTER REVENUES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/27/02 — 10/3/02 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description GENERAL SUPPLIES DATA PROCESSING DATA PROCESSING 10/2/02 14:39:41 Page - 24 Business Unit CLUB HOUSE CENT SERV GEN - MIS CENT SERV GEN - MIS COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 45.50 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 238939 1013/02 103460 SNAP -ON TOOLS 19.92 TORX DRIVER 50404 215310716 5420.6406 19.92 238940 1013/02 104098 SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL 102.72 SOFTWARE LICENSE 50609 80E83 1554.6160 14,125.07 SOFTWARE LICENSES 50610 80138D 1554.6160 14,227.79 238941 10/3102 101002 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS INC 24.50 50509 133810 5822.5515 2,035.75 50510 133809 5822.5514 8,197.15 50511 133816 5842.5514 38.85 50512 133817 5842.5515 10,296.25 238942 10/3/02 101023 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CABLE COMMI 2,015.85 3RD QUARTER 50439 200216 2210.6136 2,015.85 238943 10/3/02 103658 ST. LOUIS PARK COMMUNITY BAND 75.00 PERFORMANCE 10 -6 -02 50611 092402 5610.6136 75.00 238944 10/3/02 102639 STROHMYER, TOM 100.00 PERFORMANCE 10 -8 -02 50612 092402 5610.6136 100.00 238945 10/3102 104349 STRUCTURED NETWORK SOLUTIONS 376.72 WIRING SERVICE 50613 10617 1554.6103 376.72 238946 1013102 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 1,491.72 DAMAGE REPAIR 50322 CVCB420433 1553.6180 1,491.72 238947 1013102 105874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC. 483.81 TIRES 50405 10005717 1553.6583 GENERAL SUPPLIES DATA PROCESSING DATA PROCESSING 10/2/02 14:39:41 Page - 24 Business Unit CLUB HOUSE CENT SERV GEN - MIS CENT SERV GEN - MIS COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER COMMUNICATIONS PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACTED REPAIRS TIRES & TUBES CENT SERV GEN - MIS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN • , ADVERTISING PERSONNEL 1,384.25 ADVERTISING OTHER 1180.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 238948 1013102 CITY OF EDINA 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS RSSCKREG LOG20000 655.20 WANT AD 50323 538870 Council Check Register 49.00 ADVERTISEMENT 50324 9/27/02 -- 10/3/02 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 135.89 TIRES 50614 10005384 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES 431.50 TIRES 50615 10005491 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES 333.05 TIRES 50616 10005524 1553.6583 TIRES 8 TUBES 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL 1,384.25 ADVERTISING OTHER 1180.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 238948 1013102 1120.6120 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 655.20 WANT AD 50323 538870 49.00 ADVERTISEMENT 50324 539525 32.17 PUBLIC NOTICE AD 50617 536897 178.75 PUBLIC NOTICE AD 50618 536898 42.90 PUBLIC HEARING AD 50619 537643 958.02 238949 10/3/02 106348 SUPERIOR PAVING 3,785.01 LEWIS PK ASPHALT WORK 50620 PO 1418 3,785.01 238950 1013/02 100794 SWANSON, HAROLD 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 50371 100302 100.00 238951 10/3102 101326 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO 254.09 TERMINALS, FUSES 50325 22553 -00 52.87 FUSES 50406 22553 -01 127.00 CONTROL SWITCHES 50621 22468 -00 433.96 238952 1013102 101034 THOMSEN & NYBECK 17,480.78 PROSECUTING 50407 174563 17,480.78 238953 1013102 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 2,545.00 50360 274404 51.40 50361 274405 374.00 50408 234673 109.20 50622 275450 3,079.60 238954 10/3/02 100540 TIGHT ROPE 2,400.00 SANDBLASTING 50326 092302 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL 2210.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 1180.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 1180.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES 1195.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5862.5514 5862.5515 5421.5514 5421.5514 5914.6180 10/2/02 14:39:41 Page - 25 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS ELECTION ELECTION ADMINISTRATION PATHS & HARD SURFACE RESERVE PROGRAM EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN LEGAL SERVICES COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL CONTRACTED REPAIRS TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/2/02 14:39:41 Council Check Register Page - 26 9/27/02 — 10/3/02 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2,400.00 238955 1013/02 102742 TKDA ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLAN 264.97 LEAK LOCATION SERVICE 50327 058537 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 264.97 238956 1013102 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 65.68 WELDING SUPPLIES 50328 204168 5910.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL (BILLING) 65.68 238957 1013102 103152 TOMLINSON, DAWN 25.25 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 50654 092602 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 25.25 238958 1013/02 103153 TREUTING, KRISTEN 41.28 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 50655 092602 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 41.28 238959 10/3102 100682 TRUGREEN -CHEMI AWN 106.50 WEED CONTROL 50440 47816 1643.6540 FERTILIZER GENERAL TURF CARE 106.50 238960 1013/02 103981 TWIN CITY OFFICE SUPPLY INC. 306.06 OFFICE SUPPLIES 50623 358609 -0 5110.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 36.82- CREDIT 50624 C358609 -0 5110.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 269.24 238961 10/3/02 106205 UNIQUE TRUCK EQUIPMENT INC. 257.95 FLOOD LIGHT 50625 22544A 1646.6556 TOOLS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 257.95 238962 1013/02 104466 UNITED MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS 263.40 ROLL TOWELS 50626 45208 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 263.40 238963 1013/02 101073 UNITED RENTALS INC. 1,698.68 DELINEATOR W/BASE 50627 498320 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 10/2102 14:39:41 Page - 27 Business Unit YOUTH RISK ENDOWMENT DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION CLUB HOUSE GRILL YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 82,80 50513 7032 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 375 00 50514 7033 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 457.80 238969 10/3102 101069 VOSS LIGHTING 65.50 CITY OF EDINA 2133074 -00 R55CKREG LOG20000 GENERAL SUPPLIES 349.85 LIGHTING 50330 2133074 -00 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 765.52 - LIGHTING 50330 2133074 -00 Council Check Register GENERAL SUPPLIES 1.180.87 9/27/02 — 1013/02 101743 WAGERS INC. Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,698.68 238964 10/3/02 101055 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 179.35 SOCKET /JOINT ASSEMBLIES 50630 103662WFOW 65.00 OBESITY CHALLENGE 50329 092302 4084.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 65.00 238965 10/3/02 103590 VALLEY -RICH CO. INC. 3,645.16 WATER MAIN REPAIR 50441 6103 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 3,223.50 WATER MAIN REPAIR 50442 6099 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 6,868.66 238966 1013102 101338 VALLIERE, JOHN 244.98 LOCKER RM FURNITURE 50409 092502 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 244.98 238967 10/3102 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 298.73 PAPER SUPPLIES 50410 442299 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 704.50 BAGS 50628 442975 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 309.92 BAGS 50629 442292 5822.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 1,313.15 238968 10/3/02 102218 VINTAGE ONE WINES 10/2102 14:39:41 Page - 27 Business Unit YOUTH RISK ENDOWMENT DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION CLUB HOUSE GRILL YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 82,80 50513 7032 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 375 00 50514 7033 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 457.80 238969 10/3102 101069 VOSS LIGHTING 65.50 LIGHTING 50330 2133074 -00 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 349.85 LIGHTING 50330 2133074 -00 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 765.52 - LIGHTING 50330 2133074 -00 5311.6408 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1.180.87 238970 1013/02 101743 WAGERS INC. 20.00 COURIER SERVICE 50331 ARIN003422 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 20.00 238971 10/3102 101223 WALSER FORD 179.35 SOCKET /JOINT ASSEMBLIES 50630 103662WFOW 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS CITY HALL GENERAL ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT POOL OPERATION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/2/02 14:39:41 Council Check Register Page - 28 9127/02 — 10/3/02 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 10.43 REMOTE CONTROL ASSEMBLY 50631 103799WFOW 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN - 267.17 ALTERNATOR ASSEMBLY 50632 103680WFOW 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 456.95 238972 10/3/02 101080 WALSH, WILLIAM 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 50370 100302 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 238973 10/3/02 106501 WERNER ELECTRIC SUPPLY 639.00 SLC TRAINING 50633 S2597906.001 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 639.00 238974 10/3102 101076 WEST PHOTO 255.49 LIGHTS, STAND, CASE 50634 6031 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 255.49 238975 10/3102 101077 WEST WELD SUPPLY CO. 254.48 WELDING SUPPLIES 50635 49594 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 254.48 238976 1013102 101888 WESTBURNE SUPPLY- 1657 89.46 TANK COVERS 50673 3475812 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 89.46 238977 10/3/02 101078 WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT -- 225.78 LIFT EXTENSION 50332 0017156 -IN 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 225.78 238978 10/3/02 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 1,103.60 50362 085689 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,065.10 50515 086118 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,062.65 50516 086085 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5,231.35 238979 10/3/02 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 484.50 50363 61988 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 518.70 50517 62326 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING CITY OF EDINA 10/2/02 14:39:41 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 29 9/27102 — 10/3/02 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,003.20 238980 1013102 101082 WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY 22.84 GOLF BALLS 50636 W136406 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 22.84 238981 1013102 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 852.40 50364 124673 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 275.00 50518 124955 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 924.75 50519 124768 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2.052.15 238982 1013102 101087 WROBLESKI, HENRY 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 50375 100302 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 238986 10/3102 101089 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 103.18 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 50637 54060095 5510.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT ARENA ADMINISTRATION 103.18 238987 1013102 101055 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 85.00 — PESTICIDE RECERTIFICATION 50675 093002 5610.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ED ADMINISTRATION 85.00 238988 1013102 106467 ABY, KATHERINE 138.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50754 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 138.00 238989 1013102 104517 ACKER, RITA 140.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50755 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 140.00 238990 1013/02 106468 ANDERSON, FRANCES 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50756 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 136.00 238991 1013102 105389 APPEL, PATRICIA J. 138.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50757 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation Council Check Register 138.00 Page - 30 238992 1013/02 — 10/3102 106469 ASHTON, ALBERTA PO # Doc No 132.00 ELECTION JUDGE Subledger Account Description Business Unit 132.00 100102 238993 10/3/02 ELECTION 106470 ASKELAND, JUDITH 100102 1180.6013 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50760 100102 136.00 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 238994 1013/02 100102 106471 BACH, KAY SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 136.00 50763 238995 1013/02 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 106472 BARRY, DORIS 50764 100102 112.00 ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION 50765 112.00 1180.6013 238996 10/3102 50766 106473 BARTOS, REYNEE 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 134.00 - -- ELECTION JUDGE 100102 1180.6013 134.00 ELECTION 238997 1013102 106474 BEERS, GERALDINE 46.00 ELECTION JUDGE 46.00 238998 1013102 106475 BEERS, MICHAEL 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE 136.00 238999 10/3102 106476 BERTELSON, CAROL M. 140.00 ELECTION JUDGE 140.00 239000 1013102 106477 BESSESEN, LAUREL 138.00 ELECTION JUDGE 138.00 239001 10/3102 106478 BIGHAM, DONA E. 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE CITY OF EDINA 10/2/02 14:39:41 Council Check Register Page - 30 9/27102 — 10/3102 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 50758 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50759 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50760 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50761 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50762 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50763 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50764 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50765 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50766 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50767 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION ,a R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation Council Check Register 136.00 239002 10/3/02 — 10/3/02 104520 BOEHNKE, EDNA PO # Doc No 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE Subledger Account Description Business Unit 136.00 100102 239003 10/3/02 ELECTION 106479 BOEMER, JULIET L. 100102 1180.6013 _140.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50770 100102 140.00 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 239004 10/3/02 100102 106480 BORAN, PATRICIA SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 100.00 ELECTION JUDGE 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 100.00 50773 239005 1013102 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 104580 BRADBURY, KATHERINE 50774 100102 177.75 ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION 50775 177.75 1180.6013 239006 1013/02 50776 106481 BRANDBERG, ZOE ANNE 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE 100102 1180.6013 136.00 ELECTION 239007 1013102 106482 BRELLENTHIN, ADELE 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE 136.00 239008 1013/02 106483 BRIGGS, JOHN G. 116.00 ELECTION JUDGE 116.00 239009 1013102 106484 BRINDLE, MARY 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE 136.00 239010 1013/02 104581 BUIE, JOANN 198.00 - -- ELECTION JUDGE 198.00 239011 10/3/02 106485 BURNETT, JAMES H. 20.00 ELECTION JUDGE 1012/02 14:39:41 Page - 31 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/27/02 — 10/3/02 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 50768 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50769 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50770 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50771 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50772 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50773 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50774 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50775 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50776 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50777 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 1012/02 14:39:41 Page - 31 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/2/02 14:39:41 Council Check Register Page - 32 9127/02 — 10/3/02 Check # Date Amount Vendor/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 20.00 239012 1013/02 106486 BUTTSCHAU, RAYMOND 13_6.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50778 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 136.00 239013 1013/02 105390 CAHN, LIBBY 20.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50779 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 20.00 239014 10/3/02 106487 CALGREN, MARY C. 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50780 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 136.00 239015 10/3102 106488 CAMPION, CHRISTINE 138.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50781 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 138.00 239016 1013102 104583 CARDLE, JANET 50.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50782 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50.00 239017 1013102 104584 CARDLE, JOHN 180.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50783 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 180.00 239018 10/3/02 104522 CAREY, SALLY 100.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50784 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 100.00 239019 1013/02 106489 CARLSON, ELAINE 138.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50785 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 138.00 239020 1013102 104524 CARROLL, PAULINE 191.25 ELECTION JUDGE 50786 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 191.25 239021 10/3102 104585 CELLA, CATHERINE 20.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50787 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION CITY OF EDINA 10/2/02 14:39:41 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 33 9/27/02 — 10/3/02 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 20.00 239022 1013102 106490 CHAMBERLAIN, MARSHA 140.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50788 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 140.00 239023 1013/02 106491 CHASE, MARLYS 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50789 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 136.00 239024 1013102 106492 CHENG, RICHARD S. 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50790 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 136.00 239025 1013102 106493 CHRISTIANSON, JANET 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50791 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 136.00 239026 1013102 106494 CLAY, JOSEPH P. 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50792 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 136.00 239027 1013/02 104525 CLEAVELAND, MARY 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50793 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 136.00 239028 1013/02 106507 COEN, MARY JANE 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50794 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 136.00 239029 10/3102 104586 CONLEY, KATHERINE 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50795 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 136.00 239030 1013102 104526 COOKE, EILEEN 189.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50796 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 189.00 239031 1013102 104527 CRACRAFT, JOHN 189.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50797 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation Council Check Register 189.00 239032 10/3/02 — 10/3/02 104528 CRACRAFT, MARIAN PO # Doc No 189.00 ELECTION JUDGE Subledger Account Description Business Unit 189.00 100102 239033 1013102 ELECTION 104529 CREW, COLLEEN 100102 1180.6013 182.25 ELECTION JUDGE 50800 100102 182.25 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 239034 1013102 100102 106512 CRONSTROM, RICHARD SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 20.00 ELECTION JUDGE 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 20.00 50804 239035 10/3/02 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 104530 DANIELSON, GLORIA 50803 100102 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION 50805 136.00 1180.6013 239036 10/3102 50806 105392 DARRELL, PATRICE 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE 100102 1180.6013 136.00 ELECTION 239037 1013/02 106513 DE ZELLER, DELPHA 140.00 ELECTION JUDGE 140.00 239038 1013/02 104587 DELEGARD, ANITA 132.75 ELECTION JUDGE 132.75 239039 1013/02 106514 DILLON, ROBERT 20.00 ELECTION JUDGE 20.00 239040 1013/02 106515 DILLON, SHIRLEY 132.00 ELECTION JUDGE 132.00 239041 1013102 104532 DODGE, PEGGY 137.25 ELECTION JUDGE 10/2/02 14:39:41 Page - 34 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/27/02 — 10/3/02 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 50798 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50799 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50800 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50801 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50802 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50804 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50803 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50805 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50806 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50807 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 10/2/02 14:39:41 Page - 34 R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Vendor/ Explanation Council Check Register 137.25 239042 10/3102 — 10/3/02 106517 DOLL, PATRICIA PO # Doc No 20.00 ELECTION JUDGE Subledger Account Description Business Unit 20.00 100102 239043 10/3102 ELECTION 106518 DOMEK, CHARLOTTE 100102 1180.6013 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50810 100102 136.00 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 239044 10/3/02 100102 104533 DVORACEK, CLEO M. SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 134.00 ELECTION JUDGE 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 134.00 50813 239045 10/3/02 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 106519 EDIN, BARBARA 50814 100102 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION 50815 136.00 1180.6013 239046 1013102 50816 106520 EISENBREY, ELIZABETH 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 138.00 ELECTION JUDGE 100102 1180.6013 138.00 ELECTION 239047 1013/02 106521 ELLEFSON, FLORENCE 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE 136.00 239048 10/3102 106522 ENGELBERT, CLARA 20.00 ELECTION JUDGE 20.00 239049 1013102 106523 ERICKSON, GALENE 134.00 ELECTION JUDGE 134.00 239050 1013102 106524 FIEDLER, MARJORIE 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE 136.00 239051 10/3/02 106525 FILLMORE, DONALD 116.00 ELECTION JUDGE 10/2/02 14:39:41 Page - 35 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/27/02 — 10/3/02 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 50808 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50809 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50810 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50811 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50812 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50813 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50814 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50815 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50816 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50817 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 10/2/02 14:39:41 Page - 35 R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Vendor/ Explanation Council Check Register 116.00 239052 1013102 — 10/3/02 106526 FINBERG, LA VAYNE PO # Doc No 20.00 ELECTION JUDGE Subledger Account Description Business Unit 20.00 100102 239053 1013/02 ELECTION 106527 FLORENZANO, JOSEPH 100102 1180.6013 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50820 100102 136.00 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 239054 10/3/02 100102 104535 FLUMERFELT, JOAN SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 118.00 ELECTION JUDGE 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 118.00 50823 239055 10/3/02 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 106528 FRANA, VIOLA 50824 100102 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION 50825 136.00 1180.6013 239056 10/3/02 50826 106529 FREEMAN, EILEEN 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 128.00 ELECTION JUDGE 100102 1180.6013 128.00 ELECTION 239057 10/3/02 106530 FREERKS, PATRICIA 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE 136.00 239058 1013102 105393 FREY, KATHERINE 180.00 ELECTION JUDGE 180.00 239059 10/3/02 106531 FRIEDMAN, MARCIA 177.75 ELECTION JUDGE 177.75 239060 10/3/02 106532 GAGNE, MARY 132.00 ELECTION JUDGE 132.00 239061 1013/02 106533 GLAD, GOLDIE 20.00 ELECTION JUDGE 10/2/02 14:39:41 Page - 36 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/27102 — 10/3/02 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 50818 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50819 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50820 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50821 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50822 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50823 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50824 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50825 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50826 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50827 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 10/2/02 14:39:41 Page - 36 ' 1 , CITY OF EDINA 10/2/02 14:39:41 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 37 9/27/02 — 10/3/02 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 20.00 239062 1013102 106534 GOODMAN, SUZANNE 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50828 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 136.00 239063 10/3/02 106535 GOTTESMAN, CAROL 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50829 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 136.00 239064 10/3/02 106536 GOTTSCHALK, PAULA -- 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50830 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 136.00 239065 10/3/02 106537 GREEN, VERA 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50831 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 136.00 239066 1013/02 103889 GRETTE, MYRTLE 134.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50832 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 134.00 239067 1013102 106562 GRIFFITHS, GEORGE III 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50833 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 136.00 239068 10/3/02 106508 GROSCHEN, EUNICE 138.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50834 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 138.00 239069 1013102 106509 GRUENENFELDER, LOIS J. 140.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50835 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 140.00 239070 1013102 106510 HABECK, MUZA 140.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50836 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 140.00 239071 1013/02 106511 HAEMIG, MARYANN 140.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50837 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation Council Check Register 140.00 Page - 38 239072 10/3/02 — 10/3/02 106566 HAMAN, EUGENE E. PO # Doc No 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE Subledger Account Description Business Unit 136.00 100102 239073 10/3102 ELECTION 106568 HANS, MARY ANN 100102 1180.6013 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50840 100102 136.00 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 239074 10/3/02 100102 106570 HANSON, JOAN B. SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 134.00 ELECTION JUDGE 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 134.00 50843 239075 1013102 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 106571 HARGREAVES, EVELYN 50844 100102 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION 50845 136.00 1180.6013 239076 1013102 50846 104540 HARMON, PATRICIA 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 180.00 ELECTION JUDGE 100102 1180.6013 180.00 ELECTION 239077 1013/02 104590 HARPER- WYLIE, JULIE 166.50 ELECTION JUDGE 166.50 239078 10/3102 106572 HARTFIEL, CLARENCE 20.00 - - ELECTION JUDGE 20.00 239079 10/3/02 106574 HATCH, HENRY 140.00 ELECTION JUDGE 140.00 239080 1013102 100800 HEDGES, DIANA 180.00 ELECTION JUDGE 180.00 239081 1013/02 106575 HEGG, MARINE S. 134.00 ELECTION JUDGE CITY OF EDNA 10/2/02 14:39:41 Council Check Register Page - 38 9/27/02 — 10/3/02 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 50838 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50839 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50840 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50841 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50842 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50843 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50844 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50845 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50846 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50847 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation ------ - - - -- Council Check Register 134.00 239082 10/3/02 — 10/3/02 106576 HELEY, CHERYL PO # Doc No 40.00 ELECTION JUDGE Subledger Account Description Business Unit 40.00 100102 239083 10/3102 ELECTION 106577 HENDRICKS, NAOMI 100102 1180.6013 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50852 100102 136.00 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 239084 10 13 /02 100102 106578 HIRSCHEY, MILES SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 138.00 ELECTION JUDGE 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 138.00 50857 239085 1013/02 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 104591 HOLMBERG, LISA 50858 100102 32.00 ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION 50860 32.00 1180.6013 239086 10/3102 50861 105395 HOLMES, FORREST 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE 100102 1180.6013 136.00 ELECTION 239087 10/3/02 106581 HOLVIK, CARLEEN 140.00 ELECTION JUDGE 140.00 239088 10/3/02 103348 HONMYHR, HELEN 180.00 ELECTION JUDGE 180.00 239089 10/3102 105396 HOPF, NANCY 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE 136.00 239090 1013/02 104603 HORTON, ANNETTE 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE 136.00 239091 1013/02 106588 HUNT, SHIRLEY K. 140.00 ELECTION JUDGE 1012/02 14:39:41 Page - 39 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/27/02 — 10/3/02 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 50850 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50851 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50852 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50854 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50855 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50857 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50858 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50860 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50861 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50863 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 1012/02 14:39:41 Page - 39 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/2/02 14:39:41 Council Check Register Page - 40 9/27/02 — 10/3/02 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 140.00 239092 10/3/02 106591 HUTCHINSON, ELSA 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50864 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 136.00 239093 1013102 104604 HUTTON, PAULETTE 50.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50865 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50.00 239094 1013102 105397 HYKES, MYRA 177.75 ELECTION JUDGE 50867 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 177.75 239095 1013102 106594 ISAACSON, DELORES 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50868 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 136.00 239096 10/3/02 101761 IVERSON, KATHRYN 1_59.75 ELECTION JUDGE 50870 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 159.75 239097 10 13 /02 106596 JAYCOX, FAITH E. 180.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50871 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 180.00 239098 10/3/02 106598 JOHNSON, ALLEN C. 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50873 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 136.00 239099 1013102 104605 JOHNSON, GERALDINE ANN 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50874 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 136.00 239100 1013102 104606 JOHNSON, KATE 32.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50876 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 32.00 239101 10/3/02 101546 JOHNSON, NAOMI 191.25 ELECTION JUDGE 50877 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION CITY OF EDINA 10/2/02 14:39:41 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 41 9/27/02 — 1013/02 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 191.25 239102 1013102 106600 JOHNSON, SHIRLEY M. 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50879 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 136.00 239103 1013102 106604 JOHNSTON, ROSEMARY 140.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50880 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 140.00 239104 10/3/02 106605 JONES, SARAH 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50882 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 136.00 239105 1013102 106608 KACHAN, MARY K. - — _124.0_0 ELECTION JUDGE 50884 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 124.00 239106 1013/02 104542 KANOFSKY, JANET 171.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50885 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 171.00 239107 1013102 106538 KAPAUN, ANN 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50888 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 136.00 239108 1013102 106539 KEENAN, ANN 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50890 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 136.00 239109 1013102 104636 KELTGEN, LUCILLE 92.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50892 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 92.00 239110 1013102 106540 KINGSTON, JESSICA 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50893 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 136.00 239111 1013102 106541 KLEFSAAS, MAVIS 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50895 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Vendor/ Explanation Council Check Register 136.00 239112 1013102 — 10/3/02 106542 KOCH, BEVERLY PO # Doc No 20.00 ELECTION JUDGE Subledger Account Description Business Unit 20.00 100102 239113 1013102 ELECTION 104609 KOCH, HARRIETT 100102 1180.6013 _____136.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50900 100102 136.00 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 239114 10/3/02 100102 105399 KOESTER, MARCIA SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 44.00 ELECTION JUDGE 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 44.00 50905 239115 1013/02 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 106543 KOPP, JANET 50907 100102 _ 132.00 ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION 50908 132.00 1180.6013 239116 1013102 50910 106544 KORIN, SUSAN 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 134.00 ELECTION JUDGE 100102 1180.6013 134.00 ELECTION 239117 1013102 106545 KOSTERS, JULIA 148.00 ELECTION JUDGE 148.00 239118 1013102 106546 KRUEGER, DOROTHY 134.00 ELECTION JUDGE 134.00 239119 10/3/02 106547 KRUSELL, SALLY 138.00 ELECTION JUDGE 138.00 239120 10/3102 103439 KUEBLER, JEAN 52.00 -- - ELECTION JUDGE 52.00 239121 10/3102 106548 KUETHER, DOROTHY 138.00 ELECTION JUDGE 10/2/02 14:39:41 Page - 42 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/27/02 — 10/3/02 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 50897 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50898 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50900 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50902 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50903 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50905 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50907 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50908 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50910 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50913 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 10/2/02 14:39:41 Page - 42 R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation Council Check Register 138.00 239122 1013/02 — 10/3/02 106549 KUMPF, MARILYN PO # Doc No 132.00 ELECTION JUDGE Subledger Account Description Business Unit 132.00 100102 239123 10/3102 ELECTION 106550 LANDBERG, MARY 100102 1180.6013 140.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50917 100102 140.00 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 239124 1013/02 100102 106551 LEAK, MARY SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 140.00 ELECTION JUDGE 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 140.00 50921 239125 1013/02 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 106552 LEE, DAISY 50923 100102 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION 50924 136.00 1180.6013 239126 1013102 50926 106553 LEEFELDT, PATRICIA 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE 100102 1180.6013 136.00 ELECTION 239127 1013/02 106554 LEHMAN, CECILE 134.00 ELECTION JUDGE 134.00 239128 1013/02 106555 LEVY, LA VERNE 140.00 ELECTION JUDGE 140.00 239129 10/3102 106556 LINDEMAN, JOYCE 132.00 ELECTION JUDGE 132.00 239130 1013102 106557 LINDSEY, ROBERT 134.00 ELECTION JUDGE 134.00 239131 10/3102 105400 LIUDAHL, JEAN 48.00 ELECTION JUDGE 10/2/02 14:39:41 Page - 43 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/27/02 — 10/3/02 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 50914 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50916 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50917 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50918 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50920 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50921 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50923 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50924 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50926 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50928 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 10/2/02 14:39:41 Page - 43 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/2102 14:39:41 Council Check Register Page - 44 9/27/02 — 10/3/02 Check # Date - - -- Amount — Vendor/ Explanation PO # -- - - - --- - - - -- -- -- Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 48.00 239132 10/3/02 104544 LONG, SUSAN 175.50 ELECTION JUDGE 50929 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 175.50 239133 10/3102 104610 LOOMIS, LOIS 138.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50931 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 138.00 239134 10/3/02 106558 LOCKER, DONNA 140.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50933 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 140.00 239135 1013102 106559 LUCKTENBERG, CLEESTINE 134.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50934 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 134.00 239136 10/3/02 105401 MACH, VIRGINIA 198.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50936 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 198.00 239137 10/3102 106560 MANTHE, ROGER 140.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50938 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 140.00 239138 10/3/02 106561 MARTIN, BARBARA 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50939 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 136.00 239139 10/3102 106580 MAYER, ALBERT 134.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50941 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 134.00 239140 1013102 106583 MCDONALD, JOANNA 132.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50942 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 132.00 239141 1013102 106586 MCFARLANE, BARBARA 134.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50945 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION CITY OF EDINA 10/2/02 14:39:41 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 45 9/27/02 — 10/3/02 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 134.00 239142 10/3102 104546 MCGLYNN, ROSEMARY 180.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50947 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 180.00 239143 1013102 106589 MCGOLDRICK, FRANCIS 140.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50948 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 140.00 239144 10/3/02 106592 MCHENRY, JOY 132.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50950 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 132.00 239145 10/3/02 106593 MEERDINK, LEONA 20.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50952 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 20.00 239146 10/3/02 104547 MELICHAR, MARGARET C. 184.50 ELECTION JUDGE 50953 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 184.50 239147 1013102 104548 MERRITT HOLMES, PAT 166.50 ELECTION JUDGE 50960 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 166.50 239148 1013102 103848 METIL, LUANA 36.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50962 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 36.00 239149 1013102 106602 MEYER, BYRON 140.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50964 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 140.00 239150 10/3102 104550 MEYERS, PATRICIA 177.75 ELECTION JUDGE 50965 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 177.75 239151 10/3102 106606 MONTEZ, PATRICIA 140.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50967 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation Council Check Register 140.00 239152 10/3102 — 10/3/02 104551 MONTGOMERY, BETH PO # Doc No 171.00 ELECTION JUDGE Subledger Account Description Business Unit 171.00 100102 239153 10/3102 ELECTION 104553 MORAN, JANE 100102 1180.6013 177.75 ELECTION JUDGE 50972 100102 177.75 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 239154 10/3102 100102 106611 MULLICK, PEGGY SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 20.00 ELECTION JUDGE 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 20.00 50977 239155 1013102 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 105888 NAAE, RON 50978 100102 20.00 —20.00 ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION 50979 100102 1180.6013 239156 1013/02 50980 106613 NEIN, ELLEN 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES _ 20.00 ELECTION JUDGE 100102 1180.6013 20.00 ELECTION 239157 1013/02 106615 NELSON, ARMI 140.00 ELECTION JUDGE 140.00 239158 1013102 104614 NELSON, JANE 166.50 ELECTION JUDGE 166.50 239159 10/3/02 106616 NELSON, JANET 36.00 ELECTION JUDGE 36.00 239160 1013102 106617 NEVILLE, JULIE 132.00 ELECTION JUDGE 132.00 239161 10/3102 106619 NIEFELD, SUSAN 166.50 ELECTION JUDGE 10/2/02 14:39:41 Page - 46 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/27/02 — 10/3/02 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 50969 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50971 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50972 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50975 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50976 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50977 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50978 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50979 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50980 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50981 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 10/2/02 14:39:41 Page - 46 R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Vendor/ Explanation Council Check Register 166.50 239162 1013102 7-10/3102 106621 ND(, ALICE PO # Doc No 140.00 ELECTION JUDGE Subledger Account Description Business Unit 140.00 100102 239163 1013102 ELECTION 106623 NORBACK, JUDITH 100102 1180.6013 50.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50984 100102 50.00 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 239164 10/3102 100102 106626 NORLANDER, WALLACE SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 132.00 — ELECTION JUDGE 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 132.00 50987 239165 1013102 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 104615 ODLAND, REBECCA 50988 100102 42.00 ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION 50989 42.00 1180.6013 239166 1013102 50990 104616 OLANDER, PATRICIA 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 182.25 ELECTION JUDGE 100102 1180.6013 182.25 ELECTION 239167 1013102 106628 ORFIELD, RENEE 20.00 ELECTION JUDGE 20.00 239168 1013102 106630 PAPPAS, PETER 138.00 ELECTION JUDGE 138.00 239169 1013102 106632 PATE, MARY 138.00 ELECTION JUDGE 138.00 239170 1013102 106634 PELISSERO, DEBRA -----140.00 ELECTION JUDGE 140.00 239171 1013102 106635 PETERSEN, BETTY LOU 20.00 ELECTION JUDGE 10/2/02 14:39:41 Page - 47 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/27/02 7-10/3102 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 50982 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50983 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50984 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50985 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50986 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50987 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50988 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50989 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50990 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50991 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 10/2/02 14:39:41 Page - 47 R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation Council Check Register 20.00 239172 1013102 — 10/3/02 106637 PETERSEN, SUSAN PO # Doc No _ 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE Subledger Account Description Business Unit 136.00 100102 239173 10/3/02 ELECTION 104555 PETERSON, DORIS 100102 1180.6013 180.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50994 100102 180.00 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 239174 10/3/02 100102 106639 PHILLIPS, GARY SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 20.00 ELECTION JUDGE 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 20.00 50997 239175 1013102 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 106641 PODNIEKS, VIZMA 50998 100102 20.00 ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION 50999 20.00 1180.6013 239176 1013102 51000 104556 POLLITT, BETTY 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 184.50 ELECTION JUDGE 100102 1180.6013 184.50 ELECTION 239177 10/3102 104618 PRESTHUS, LINDA 166.50 ELECTION JUDGE 166.50 239178 10/3102 105825 PROUDFIT, JUDITH 140.00 ELECTION JUDGE 140.00 239179 10/3/02 106644 PRUDLO, PATRICIA 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE 136.00 239180 10/3/02 104619 REDDING, DONNA _ 193.50 ELECTION JUDGE 193.50 239181 10/3102 106647 REECE, MYRN 140.00 ELECTION JUDGE 10/2102 14:39:41 Page - 48 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/27/02 — 10/3/02 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 50993 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50992 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50994 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50995 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50996 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50997 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50998 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50999 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 51000 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 51001 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 10/2102 14:39:41 Page - 48 R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # - -- Date - -- Amount -- Vendor / Explanation - - - - - - -- Council Check Register 140.00 239182 10/3/02 — 10/3/02 104557 RENSLOW, SHIRLEY PO # Doc No 138.00 ELECTION JUDGE Subledger Account Description Business Unit 138.00 100102 239183 10/3102 ELECTION 106649 RESCH, RICHARD 100102 1180.6013 140.00 ELECTION JUDGE 51004 100102 140.00 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 239184 1013102 100102 104558 RICKORD, SHIRLEY SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 144.00 ELECTION JUDGE 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 144.00 50849 239185 10/3/02 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 104622 ROACH, JENNIFER 50853 100102 28.00 ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION 50856 28.00 1180.6013 239186 1013102 50859 106563 ROBERTS, GAIL 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE 100102 1180.6013 136.00 ELECTION 239187 1013102 106564 ROBERTSON, LOIS M 134.00 ELECTION JUDGE 134.00 239188 1013102 106565 ROBINSON, MARIE J 142.00 ELECTION JUDGE 142.00 239189 1013102 106567 ROGERS, MARY A 189.00 ELECTION JUDGE 189.00 239190 1013102 104559 RUEDY, MARJORIE 154.00 ELECTION JUDGE 154.00 239191 1013/02 106573 RUFF, GWENDOLYN E. 98.00 ELECTION JUDGE 10/2/02 14:39:41 Page - 49 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/27/02 — 10/3/02 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 51002 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 51003 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 51004 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 51005 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50848 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50849 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50853 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50856 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50859 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50862 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 10/2/02 14:39:41 Page - 49 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/2/02 14:39:41 Council Check Register Page - 50 9/27/02 - 10/3/02 Check # -- - -- Date - -- - Amount - -- - Vendor / Explanation PO # -- -- ----- - - - - -- — Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 98.00 239192 10/3/02 106579 RYAN, MARY ANN 140.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50866 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 140.00 239193 1013/02 105405 RYAN, MARY E. 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50869 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 136.00 239194 10/3/02 105406 RYMAN, DUANE 138.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50872 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 138.00 239195 10/3102 106584 SAFLEY, DIANNE L. 32.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50875 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 32.00 239196 1013/02 106585 SANDBERG, MILDRED B 138.00 - -- ELECTION JUDGE 50878 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 138.00 239197 10/3/02 104560 SCHMID, KATHRYN 138.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50881 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 138.00 239198 1013/02 106587 SCHRAMM, CONSTANCE E. 134.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50883 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 134.00 239199 10/3/02 106590 SCHWARZ, RADONNA J. 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50886 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 136.00 239200 10/3/02 104561 SCOFIELD, BERNARDINE 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50887 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 136.00 239201 10/3102 104562 SEDOFF, JEANNE 140.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50889 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation Council Check Register 140.00 239202 1013102 — 10/3/02 106595 SELID, MARION P. PO # Doc No 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE Subledger Account Description Business Unit 136.00 100102 239203 1013102 ELECTION 106597 SEWALL, MICHAEL O 100102 1180.6013 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50896 100102 136.00 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 239204 10/3102 100102 106599 SHAW, ROBERT M SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES - 134.00 — ELECTION JUDGE 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 134.00 50904 239205 10/3102 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 106601 SKUBE, MARY K. 50906 100102 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION 50909 136.00 1180.6013 239206 1013102 50911 106603 SKUDSTAD, RONALD D 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE 100102 1180.6013 136.00 ELECTION 239207 10/3/02 106614 SMITH, PENNY 20.00 ELECTION JUDGE 20.00 239208 1013/02 106609 SMITH, RUTH L 186.75 ELECTION JUDGE 186.75 239209 1013102 106612 STALPES, GAIL E 126.00 ELECTION JUDGE 126.00 239210 1013102 104625 STANGLER, GISELE 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE 136.00 239211 1013/02 106607 STARK, ARDELL F 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE 10/2/02 14:39:41 Page - 51 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/27/02 — 10/3/02 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 50891 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50894 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50896 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50899 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50901 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50904 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50906 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50909 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50911 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50912 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 10/2/02 14:39:41 Page - 51 R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation Council Check Register 136.00 239212 1013102 — 10 /3 /02 106610 STEELE, VRIGINIAL PO # Doc No 20.00 ELECTION JUDGE Subledger Account Description Business Unit 20.00 100102 239213 10/3102 ELECTION 106618 STEVENSON, JAMES A 100102 1180.6013 140.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50922 100102 140.00 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 239214 10/3102 100102 106620 STOLEE, MICHAEL J SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 138.00 - -� - -- ELECTION JUDGE 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 138.00 50930 239215 10/3102 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 106622 STRANG, LEE M 50932 100102 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE ELECTION 50935 136.00 1180.6013 239216 1013102 50937 103331 TILSNER, DONNA 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES 164.25 ELECTION JUDGE 100102 1180.6013 164.25 ELECTION 239217 10/3102 106624 TIMM, DAVID E 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE 136.00 239218 10/3102 106625 TINDALL, JAMES W 134.00 ELECTION JUDGE 134.00 239219 10/3102 106627 TRUONG, VIEM 138.00 ELECTION JUDGE 138.00 239220 1013102 104564 UEBEL, MARY 134.00 ELECTION JUDGE 134.00 239221 1013/02 106629 ULVIN, JANET M 148.00 ELECTION JUDGE 10/2/02 14:39:41 Page - 52 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/27/02 — 10 /3 /02 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 50915 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50919 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50922 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50925 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50927 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50930 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50932 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50935 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50937 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50940 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 10/2/02 14:39:41 Page - 52 CITY OF EDINA 10/2/02 14:39:41 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 53 9/27102 — 10/3/02 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 148.00 239222 1013102 104626 VANEK, MARY 140.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50943 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 140.00 239223 1013102 106633 VANMAASDAM, MARY SUSAN 134.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50944 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 134.00 239224 1013/02 106631 VASHRO, DARLA J 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50946 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 136.00 239225 10/3/02 104627 VAURIO, PATRICIA 40.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50949 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 40.00 239226 1013/02 106636 VOLPE, EPHIE T 138.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50951 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 138.00 239227 10/3102 104628 VONHOF, VIRGINIA 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50954 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 136.00 239228 1013102 104106 WAACK, SUSAN 20.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50955 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 20.00 239229 1013102 106638 WASHBURN, VIRGINIA 134.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50956 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 134.00 239230 1013102 105410 WATKINS, JOAN 136.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50957 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 136.00 239231 10/3102 106640 WESTERDAHL, BIRDIE 140.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50958 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount V_ endor / Explanation 140.00 239232 10/3/02 106642 WHITE, DONNA R — 10/3/02 20.00 ELECTION JUDGE PO # Doc No Inv No 20.00 Subledger 239233 1013102 50959 106643 WIDGA, AGNES V 1180.6013 20.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50961 100102 20.00 239234 1013102 50963 106645 WIDGA, LELAND J 1180.6013 140.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50966 100102 140.00 239235 1013102 50968 106646 WINTER, DAVID G 1180.6013 132.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50970 100102 132.00 239236 10/3/02 50973 104632 WOLD, LORETTA 1180.6013 138.00 ELECTION JUDGE 50974 100102 138.00 239237 1013/02 104633 WOODBECK, SHEILA Payment Instrument Totals 172.00 ELECTION JUDGE Check Total 172.00 239238 1013/02 104634 YEE, MARY 946,257.87 52.00 — ELECTION JUDGE 52.00 239239 10/3/02 106648 ZALK, ANN L 52.00 ELECTION JUDGE 52.00 946,257.87 Grand Total 10/2/02 14:39:41 Page - 54 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/27/02 — 10/3/02 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 50959 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50961 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50963 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50966 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50968 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50970 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50973 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION 50974 100102 1180.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES ELECTION Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 946,257.87 Total Payments 946,257.87 10/2/02 14:39:41 Page - 54 t. R55CKSUM LOG20000 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 227,467.30 02100 CDBG FUND 6,900.00 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 2,761.39 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 100,261.14 04800 CONSTRUCTION FUND 391.49 05100 ART CENTER FUND 5,823.56 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 765.52 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 7,128.85 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 1,744.84 05600 EDINBOROUGH/CENT LAKES FUND 4,990.47 05800 LIQUOR FUND 109,026.77 05900 UTILITY FUND 42,835.92 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 6,160.62 09900 PAYROLL FUND 430,000.00 Report Totals 946,257.87 CITY OF EDINA 10/2102 14:44:22 Council Check Summary Page - 1 9/27/02 - 10/3/02 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all materiel respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing po icies and procedurese D 3 , at Fi nager 239245 10/10/02 101874 ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS INC. 75.08 RADIO ATTACHMENTS 51008 31388 1553.6237 75.08 239246 10/10/02 106658 ANDERSON, SHIRLEY 15.00 LINE DANCE REFUND 51132 100302 1628.4392.09 RADIO SERVICE 10/9/02 13:54:55 Page - 1 Business Unit GENERAL STORM SEWER POLICE DEPT. GENERAL K -9 UNIT ANIMAL CONTROL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ED ADMINISTRATION STREET RENOVATION STREET RENOVATION VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN SENIOR SPECIAL EVENTS SENIOR CITIZENS CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 1017/02 - 10/10102 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 239240 1017102 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 5,000.00 LMC PHASE II GUIDE PLAN 51340 100702 5932.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5,000.00 239241 1017/02 103512 QUIST, SUSAN 4.66 51341 100402 1400.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 14.96 51341 100402 1438.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 18.13 51341 100402 1450.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 23.00 51341 100402 1400.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 37.28 51341 100402 1400.6106 MEETING EXPENSE 37.75 51341 100402 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 38.82 51341 100402 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 141.53 51341 100402 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 263.90 51341 100402 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 580.03 239242 10/10/02 104710 ADAMS, MARK 100.00 PERFORMANCE 10 -15 -02 51303 092402 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER 100.00 239243 10/10/02 102626 AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES 1,498.94 READY MIX 51006 98146 1314.6520 CONCRETE 1,029.06 READY MIX 51007 97608 1314.6520 CONCRETE 2,528.00 239244 10110102 102609 ALL SAINTS BRANDS 792,20 50676 00006276 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 15.95 50677 00006208 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 454.48 50678 00006207 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 883.95 51087 00006459 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 9ai nn 51352 00006529 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 239245 10/10/02 101874 ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS INC. 75.08 RADIO ATTACHMENTS 51008 31388 1553.6237 75.08 239246 10/10/02 106658 ANDERSON, SHIRLEY 15.00 LINE DANCE REFUND 51132 100302 1628.4392.09 RADIO SERVICE 10/9/02 13:54:55 Page - 1 Business Unit GENERAL STORM SEWER POLICE DEPT. GENERAL K -9 UNIT ANIMAL CONTROL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ED ADMINISTRATION STREET RENOVATION STREET RENOVATION VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN SENIOR SPECIAL EVENTS SENIOR CITIZENS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/9/02 13:54:55 Council Check Register Page - 2 1017/02 - 10/10102 Check # Date _ Amount Vendor /Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 15.00 239247 10/10/02 102566 APPLIED CONCEPTS INC 33.89 CABLE 51009 77312 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 33.89 239248 10110/02 102646 AQUA LOGIC INC. 98.18 BRONZE SOCKET 51133 21983 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 98.18 239249 10/10102 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 195.25 COFFEE 51134 6013 - 277318 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 195.25 239250 10110102 101977 ARCH WIRELESS 8.21 PAGER 51135 L6096083J 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 8.21 239251 10/10/02 100929 ARCTIC GLACIER INC. 179.30 51088 DB227313 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 42.00 51353 DB227509 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 129.00 51354 DB227507 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 350.30 239252 10110/02 100375 ASPEN ENVIRONMENTAL 25.00 EXTRA SERVICE 51010 30917 1621.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES 52.72 BATHROOM SERVICING 51011 30739 1621.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES 25.00 EXTRA SERVICE 51012 30916 1642.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIELD MAINTENANCE 122.69 BATHROOM SERVICING 51136 30960 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE 8 GROUNDS 61.35 BATHROOM SERVICING 51137 30959 5430.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 286.76 239253 10/10/02 102817 ASSOCIATED BAG COMPANY 165.54 POLY BAGS 51304 43509 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 165.54 239254 10110/02 101954 AUGIE'S INC. 56.79 FOOD 51138 2879 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD RICHARDS GOLF COURSE CITY OF EDINA 10/9/02 13:54:55 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 3 10/7/02 — 10110/02 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 56.79 239255 10/10/02 100638 BACHMAN'S 96.30 FLOWERS 51214 092002 5422.6275 COURSE BEAUTIFICATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 96.30 239256 10/10/02 106666 BALLENTINE, TERESA - 48.00 CLASS REFUND 51305 100302 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 48.00 239257 10110/02 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO. 1,449.00 LANDSCAPE REDESIGN 51139 2327D16 -13 04258.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION T258PAMELA PARKILAKE STORM WAT 6,903.90 STORMWATER MGMT 51140 2327354 -105 5932.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL STORM SEWER 8,352.90 239258 10110/02 102195 BATTERIES PLUS 78.87 BATTERIES 51013 F51- 125736 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS 78.87 239259 10110102 102449 BATTERY WHOLESALE INC. 384.55 BATTERIES 51014 15494 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 384.55 239260 10110/02 102009 BEER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE 45.00 BEERLINE CLEANING 51141 5951 5421.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GRILL 45.00 239261 10/10/02 101245 BELL, BRUCE 125.00 PERFORMANCE 10 -15-02 51306 092402 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 125.00 239262 10/10/02 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 162.61 50679 36153200 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 200.25 50680 24684900 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING -- 452.00 51089 24716500 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 814.86 239263 10/10102 100661 BENN, BRADLEY 99.70 FOOD FOR TILE SHOW 51287 100202 5120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/9/02 13:54:55 Council Check Register Page - 4 1017/02 - 10/10/02 Check # Date -- -- - Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # -- - - - - -- ... -- -- Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 99.70 239264 10/10/02 103712 BERNADAS WINES SELECTION INC. 229.23 50681 164985 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 229.23 239265 10/10/02 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 7.99 OFFICE SUPPLIES 51015 1232080 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 8.08 OFFICE SUPPLIES 51015 1232080 1180.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ELECTION 11.94 OFFICE SUPPLIES 51015 1232080 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 15.93 OFFICE SUPPLIES 51015 1232080 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 29.48 OFFICE SUPPLIES 51015 1232080 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 130.02 OFFICE SUPPLIES 51015 1232080 1160.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FINANCE 84.67 FILE FOLDERS 51016 R340161 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 4.61 HANGER PARTITION 51017 1211761 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 112.30 OFFICE SUPPLIES 51018 1233210 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 19.62 VIEW BINDERS 51019 1239030 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 16.37 STAPLER 51020 1223940 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 36.82 OFFICE SUPPLIES 51021 1238500 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 17.21 NAME PLATE 51142 1239100 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 37.17 BINDERS 51143 1223941 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 21.16 MARKERS 51144 1230730 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 9.96 MOUSE PADS 51215 1238501 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 563.33 239266 10/10/02 104053 BIOCLEAN MOBILE WASH INC. 974.48 WASH TRUCKS & EQUIPT 51216 33079 1553.6238 CAR WASH EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 974.48 239267 10110102 102708 BIRD & CRONIN 86.86 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 51307 713603 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 86.86 239268 10/10/02 104971 BKV GROUP 6,111.00 FURNITURE BUDGET 51217 20170 4400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CITY HALL/POLICE BUILDING 6,111.00 239269 10/10/02 106656 BLESSING, TRISH 15.00 LINE DANCE REFUND 51145 100302 1628.4392.09 SENIOR SPECIAL EVENTS SENIOR CITIZENS • , ' ' CITY OF EDINA 10/9/02 13:54:55 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 5 10!7102 — 10110/02 Check # Date Amount Vendor I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 15.00 239270 10110/02 100623 BOSS PUMPING 105.00 PUMPED HOLDING TANK 51022 4785 1646.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 105.00 239271 10/10/02 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 180.71 FA.S.T. SYSTEMS 51308 634519 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 180.71 239272 10/10102 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 108.76 SWITCH ASSEMBLY 51218 434917 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 15.82 INDICATOR 51219 436036 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 124.58 239273 10110102 103820 BRANDENBURG, HEIDI 22.50 PARKING PERMIT REFUND 51309 100402 4090.4751 PARKING PERMITS STREET REVOLVING 22.50 239274 10/10102 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 1,240.10 UST REMOVAL ASSESSMENT 51146 213865 4400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CITY HALLIPOLICE BUILDING 48.00 CONCRETE TESTING 51147 213827 06031.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION TF31 VERNON & GLEASON TRAF SIG 147.00 CONCRETE TESTING 51148 213821 01318.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BA -318 W 77TH ST - PENTAGON PK 1,435.10 239275 10/10/02 101366 BRENTS SIGNS AND DISPLAYS 26.63 SIGN 51023 00002435 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 26.63 239276 10110/02 103239 BRIN NORTHWESTERN GLASS CO. 236.49 REPAIRS 51149 506153 5821.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 236.49 239277 10/10102 100667 BROCK WHITE COMPANY 331.70 COLUMN FORMS 51024 SP29051301 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 331.70 239278 10/10102 101430 BROWNELLS INC. 160.20 GUN CLEANING SUPPLIES 51025 02519150.00 1400.6551 AMMUNITION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 10/7/02 — 10/10/02 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 160.20 239279 10/10/02 100058 BROWNING FERRIS INDUSTRIES OF 30,418.60 RECYCLING 51348 700007809002 5952.6183 RECYCLING CHARGES 30,418.60 239280 10/10102 100671 BUDGET LIGHTING 505.93 REPAIR LAMPS 51150 00211580 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 505.93 239281 10/10/02 100391 CALL ONE INC. 26.75 PISTOLGRIP BASE 51026 497137 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 26.75 239282 10/10/02 100678 CARLSON PRINTING 59.64 BUSINESS CARDS 51310 00080100 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 59.64 239283 10/10/02 100681 CATCO _ 65.54 HOSE ENDS 51220 13 -17686 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 65.54 239284 10/10/02 105497 CENTRAL ROOFING CO. 1,_878_.00 ROOF REPAIRS 51151 5450 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1,878.00 239285 10/10/02 100683 CHEMSEARCH 135.50 MAXI -LURE RED 51221 788217 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES 135.50 239286 10110102 100684 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON 10/9/02 13:54:55 Page - 6 Business Unit RECYCLING ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 170.00 POLYGRAPH TEST 51027 23934 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 170.00 239287 10110/02 105693 CITYSPRINT 20.33 COURIER 51152 10497 -1916 1180.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ELECTION 31.20 COURIER 51152 10497 -1916 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 4 10/9/02 13:54:55 Page - 7 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 2,910.55 50682 192747 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,213.00 51090 193659 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 33365 51091 193661 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 4,457.20 CITY OF EDINA 239292 10/10/02 R55CKREG LOG20000 84.85 CRESCENT WRENCHES 51031 368108 1553.6556 TOOLS Council Check Register MIRROR, BRAKE TOOLS 51032 369808 1553.6556 TOOLS 141.50 10/7/02 - 10/10/02 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 51.53 BAKERY 51153 134995 5421.5510 239288 10110102 BAKERY 100689 CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP. 134996 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 19.86 BAKERY 135.92 PIERCE PINS 51311 34763 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BAKERY 51222 135.92 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 129.18 239289 10/10/02 101323 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS 239294 10/10102 102712 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION 405.76 GLOVES, GLASSES, PODS 51028 01904322 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 5420.6188 TELEPHONE 56.55 GLOVES 51029 01907253 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT TELEPHONE 15.20 462.31 51313 W02080602 1628.6188 TELEPHONE 239290 10/10/02 100695 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO. 119.84 KNIVES. SPONGES 51030 105530 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 119.84 239291 10110/02 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING 10/9/02 13:54:55 Page - 7 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 2,910.55 50682 192747 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,213.00 51090 193659 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 33365 51091 193661 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 4,457.20 239292 10/10/02 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 84.85 CRESCENT WRENCHES 51031 368108 1553.6556 TOOLS 56.65 MIRROR, BRAKE TOOLS 51032 369808 1553.6556 TOOLS 141.50 239293 10/10/02 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 60.03 BAKERY 51153 134995 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 35.57 BAKERY 51154 134996 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 19.86 BAKERY 51155 135055 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 13.72 BAKERY 51222 135300 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 129.18 239294 10/10102 102712 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION 87.04 51312 W02080609 5420.6188 TELEPHONE 15.14 GREENHOUSE 51313 W02080602 1646.6188 TELEPHONE 15.20 51313 W02080602 1628.6188 TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GRILL GRILL GRILL GRILL CLUB HOUSE BUILDING MAINTENANCE SENIOR CITIZENS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1019/02 13:54:55 Council Check Register Page - 8 10n/02 - 10/10/02 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 17.04 51313 W02080602 2210.6188 TELEPHONE COMMUNICATIONS 45.42 HISTORICAL 51313 W02080602 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 45.60 ARNESON 51313 W02080602 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 50.33 51313 W02080602 5210.6188 TELEPHONE GOLF DOME PROGRAM 60.65 51313 W02080602 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 75.70 CARD ACCESS -PARKS 51313 W02080602 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 75.70 51313 W02080602 1481.6188 TELEPHONE YORK FIRE STATION 75.70 51313 W02080602 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 75.86 51313 W02080602 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 94.56 51313 W02080602 5311.6188 TELEPHONE POOL OPERATION 95.35 51313 W02080602 5111.6188 TELEPHONE ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 121.39 51313 W02080602 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 167.30 51313 W02080602 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING 8 HOCKEY 251.04 51313 W02080602 5610.6188 TELEPHONE ED ADMINISTRATION 1,369.02 239295 10/10/02 101675 DESHLER, BRANDON 127.50 NEXTEL REIMBURSEMENT 51033 100102 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 127.50 239296 10/10/02 101036 DICKER, TOBIE 192.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 51288 100202 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 192.00 239297 10/10/02 106230 DIRECT LINE SERVICES 325.00 OCT. AD 51156 1505 -33 5410.6575 PRINTING GOLF ADMINISTRATION 325.00 239298 10110/02 102823 DIRECT SAFETY COMPANY 97.00 SAFETY GLASSES 51034 00186605 5911.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER 97.00 239299 10/10 /02 102659 DPD _ 379.04 SKATING PASSES 51157 0019973 -IN 5510.6575 PRINTING ARENA ADMINISTRATION 379.04 239300 10/10/02 105907 DTE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES 520.00 GENSET REPAIRS 51314 8020097 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 10/9102 13:54:55 Page - 9 Business Unit EDINBOROUGH PARK ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS GOLF CARS 155.98 50683 603051 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE CITY OF EDINA 2,120.78 R55CKREG LOG20000 602427 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5.97- 50685 595615 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING Council Check Register 51092 606544 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 473.25 1017/02 - 10/10/02 607051 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 520.00 239301 10/10/02 102344 DUMONCEAUX, NICOLE 3,346.80 50686 115.50 SKATING INSTRUCTOR 51223 100302 5620.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50687 302385 115.50 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 104.25 50688 239302 10/10/02 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 100735 E -Z SHARP INC 2,988.00 50689 301781 5822.5514 - 5_83.02 - SKATE SHARPENER SUPPLIES 51158 6240 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 583.02 51357 305342 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 239303 10110/02 51358 100736 E -Z -GO TEXTRON 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 19.60 51359 20.16 CART PARTS 51159 1124510 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS 51360 304762 20.16 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 21,430.20 239304 10/10/02 100739 EAGLE WINE 239306 10/10/02 103163 EBERT CONSTRUCTION 10/9102 13:54:55 Page - 9 Business Unit EDINBOROUGH PARK ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS GOLF CARS 155.98 50683 603051 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,120.78 50684 602427 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5.97- 50685 595615 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 983.63 51092 606544 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 473.25 51355 607051 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,010.20 51356 606545 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,737.87 239305 10110/02 100741 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 3,346.80 50686 301783 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,992.10 50687 302385 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 104.25 50688 303012 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,988.00 50689 301781 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 158.00 51160 303668 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 7,572.35 51357 305342 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 19.60 51358 305341 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 19.60 51359 305343 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,229.50 51360 304762 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 21,430.20 239306 10/10/02 103163 EBERT CONSTRUCTION 18,254.45 CLUBHOUSE CONSTRUCTION 51130 APPL #9 5451.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS CLUBHOUSE ADDITION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1019/02 13:54:55 Council Check Register Page - 10 WNW — 10/10/02 Check # Date Amount Vendor I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 18,254.45 239307 10/10/02 100742 ECOLAB PEST ELIMINATION DIVISI 113.4_2 — — PEST CONTROL 51224 8841338 5620.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EOUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK 113.42 239308 10/10102 101341 EDINA FIREMEN'S RELIEF ASSOCIA 275,024.00 2002 STATE FIRE AID 51035 100102 1400.4218 POLICE AID 1% POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 275,024.00 239309 10110/02 105224 EDINA POLICE RESERVES 175.00 MN OVARIAN CANCER RUN 51225 100402 1428.6010 SALARIES REGULAR EMPLOYEES OFF DUTY EMPLOYMENT 175.00 239310 10/10/02 102955 EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS 105.00 USE PERMIT 51161 8378 4505.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MN TECHNICAL RESCUE SCHOOL 105.00 239311 10110/02 105294 EKLUND MULCH SALES 225.00 RED MULCH 51226 00105 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 225.00 239312 10/10/02 100549 ELECTRIC PUMP INC. 211.40 PUMP PARTS 51036 0021641 -IN 5911.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER 211.40 239313 10110/02 101444 ELECTRIC SERVICE CO. 896.00 SERVICE TO SET POLES 51037 118816 1322.6530 REPAIR PARTS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 896.00 239314 10/10/02 106194 EMA INC. 5,080.00 SCADA MASTER PLAN 51162 5604- 90002802 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 5,080.00 239315 10110102 106213 EMSAR TWIN CRIES 57.28 COT REPAIRS 51315 6542 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 469.26 COT REPAIRS 51316 6526 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CITY OF EDINA 1019/02 13:54:55 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 11 10/7/02 —10/1 0/02 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 526.54 239316 10/10/02 102311 ENGEN, KELVIN 143.53 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 51317 100402 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 143.53 239317 10110102 102179 EULL'S MANUFACTURING CO INC. 116.71 SOLIDS 51038 38967 5932.6530 REPAIR PARTS GENERAL STORM SEWER 217.04 MANHOLE BRICK 51039 38184 5932.6530 REPAIR PARTS GENERAL STORM SEWER 333.75 239318 10/10/02 101476 EVERGREEN LAND SERVICES 467.80 EASEMENT ACQUISITION 51163 00 -4309 01318.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BA -318 W 77TH ST - PENTAGON PK 467.80 239319 10/10/02 100018 EXPERT T BILLING 3,636_.00 SEPT. BILLING 51164 100302 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 3,636.00 239320 10/10/02 105934 F.M. FRATTALONE EXCAVATING & G 4,655.00 LEWIS PK EAST 51040 APPL #FOUR 47001.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT LEWIS PARK - RENOVATE E SOCCER 4,655.00 LEWIS PK CENTRAL 51040 APPL #FOUR 47020.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTRAL SOCCER LEWIS PARK 9,310.00 239321 10/10/02 100216 FARMER BROTHERS COFFEE 38.20 COFFEE 51227 7840419 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 38.20 239322 10/10/02 100297 FAST FOTO & DIGITAL 76.45 PHOTOGRAPHY 51165 T2- 137831 2210.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 17.14 PHOTO PROCESSING 51344 T2- 138182 2210.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 93.59 239323 10/10/02 104474 FILTERFRESH 215.92 COFFEE 51041 67197 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 215.92 239324 10/10/02 106652 FOLSTAD, LEE A. 400.00 CONSULTATION 51042 090402 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/9/02 13:54:55 Council Check Register Page - 12 1017/02 - 10/10102 Check # Date Amount Vendor I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 400.00 239325 10/10/02 102727 FORCE AMERICA 136.45 ELEMENTS 51228 1035405 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 136.45 239326 10/10/02 106351 FOSTER, REBECCA 497.56 GIS/LIS CONFERENCE 51349 100702 1260.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ENGINEERING GENERAL 497.56 239327 10110/02 101022 FRAME, SUSAN 617.50 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 51289 100202 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 1,800.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 51289 100202 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 2,417.50 239328 10/10102 103039 FREY, MICHAEL 75.00 JURIED SHOW AWARD 51290 100202 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 304.31 SUPPLIES 51291 100402 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 420.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 51291 100402 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 799.31 239329 10/10102 101222 FRIEDRICHS, JIM 168.47 UNIFORM PURCHASE 51166 100102 5911.6201 LAUNDRY PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER 168.47 239330 10/10/02 100764 G & K SERVICES 55.10 UNIFORM PURCHASE 51043 90011116 5911.6201 LAUNDRY PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER 55.10 239331 10110/02 105508 GEMPLER'S INC. 73.35 THERMOMETER 51044 P071529300019 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 73.35 239332 10/10102 100920 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY- MINNEA 932.06 PARTS 51318 093002 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 932.06 239333 10110/02 104468 GLAS, JOHN 910.00 CLEANING 51229 091502 5421.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GRILL A. , % . R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/9102 13:54:55 Council Check Register Page - 13 10(7102 - 10/10/02 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 715.00 CLEANING 51230 093002 5424.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RANGE 1,625.00 239334 10110102 103316 GOETSCH, SAM L. 420.00 INTERPRETER 51319 100302 1629.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 420.00 239335 10/10102 101103 GRAINGER 127.63 V -BELTS 51233 937$98987 -6 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 137.45 MINI ENDS 51234 001- 919000 -8 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 40.74 MINI END 51235 552- 898988 -1 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 305.82 239336 10/10/02 102670 GRAND PERE WINES INC 557.00 50690 00010284 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 397.5_0 51361 00010352 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 954.50 239337 10/10/02 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 342.00 51362 49788 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 342.00 239338 10/10102 106667 GRATTON, COLLEEN 102.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 51292 100402 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 102.00 239339 10/10/02 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. 176.77 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 51231 1041404936 5911.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER 463.10 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 51231 1041404936 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 639.87 239340 10110/02 101350 GREEN ACRES SPRINKLER CO. 233.22 WINTERIZE IRRIGATION 51232 023132 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 233.22 239341 10/10/02 100782 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. 73.09- 50691 596489 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/9/02 13:54:55 Council Check Register Page - 14 10/7102 - 10/10/02 Check # Date Amount Vendor I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 276.65- 50692 596768 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,358.00- 50693 595917 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 33.95- 50694 595487 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 30.20 51093 607055 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 527.30 51094 604944 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 4,950.43 51095 607056 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 586.28 51096 607054 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 26.38- 51097 597135 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 85.80 51363 608835 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 68.95 51364 607053 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING .70 51365 606813 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 68.95 51366 607049 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,771.90 51367 607050 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 16.90- 51368 596490 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 6,305.54 239342 10110102 102320 HAMCO DATA PRODUCTS 133.90 REGISTER PAPER 51045 223860 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 133.90 239343 10/10102 106665 HARGIS, WILLIAM J. 25,190.00 EASEMENT ACQUISITION 51320 100402 06032.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS TF32 76TH & YORK TRAFFIC SIGNA 25,190.00 239344 10110102 106659 HASTERT, JESSICA 22.50 PARKING PERMIT REFUND 51167 100302 4090.4751 PARKING PERMITS STREET REVOLVING 22.50 239345 10/10/02 100800 HEDGES, DIANA _249_.9_5 SNACKS FOR CLASSES 51293 100402 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 249.95 239346 10110/02 101209 HEIMARK FOODS 214.80 MEAT PATTIES 51236 016243 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 214.80 239347 10/10/02 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER . 4,971.41 AUGUST 2002 51046 000687 1195.6225 BOARD 8 ROOM PRISONER LEGAL SERVICES , R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1019/02 13:54:55 Council Check Register Page - 15 10!7102 -- 10/10/02 Check # -- Date -- Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit - - -- 4,971.41 239348 10110102 101808 HENNEPIN SOUTH SERVICES COLLAR 5,384.00 4TH QTR 51168 153 1508.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RPC 5,384.00 239349 10/10/02 102484 HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MANUFACTURI 428.13 STRIPING PAINT 51237 58029 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER FIELD MAINTENANCE 428.13 239350 10/10/02 102690 NOEL, JUDY 60.00 SKATING INSTRUCTOR 51238 100302 5620.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINBOROUGH PARK 60.00 239351 10110/02 100417 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY -_ 59.25 - - ACID, D.E. 51239 2092308 5620.6545 CHEMICALS EDINBOROUGH PARK 59.25 239352 10110102 102463 HOULE, WAYNE D. 339.32 APWA CONFERENCE 51343 100702 1260.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ENGINEERING GENERAL 339.32 239353 10/10102 101714 IDENTISYS INC. 374.50 OFFICE SUPPLIES 51240 63628 5610.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ED ADMINISTRATION 374.50 239354 10/10/02 102664 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS 184.20 MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 51169 23407529 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 184.20 239355 10110102 101861 J.H. LARSON COMPANY 82.19 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 51047 4303917 -01 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 82.20 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 51047 4303917 -01 5911.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER 16.86 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 51170 4304380.01 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 46.89 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 51170 4304380 -01 5911.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER 84.37 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 51170 4304380 -01 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 312.51 239356 10/10/02 101612 JACK RICHESON & CO. INC. 372.15 WATER COLORS 51048 0231490 -IN 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP CITY OF EDINA 10/9/02 13:54:55 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 16 1017/02 - 10/10/02 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 372.15 239357 10110/02 100828 JERRY'S FOODS 37.83 51321 827 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 52.69 51321 827 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 64.65 51321 827 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 94.06 51321 827 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 249.23 239358 10/10102 100833 JOHN HENRY FOSTER MINNESOTA IN 1,105.56 AIR COMPRESSOR REPAIR 51049 1219269 5915.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS WATER TREATMENT 1,105.56 239360 10/10/02 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 167.42 50695 1461227 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,579.41 50696 1461225 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,577.80 50697 1461215 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,984.82 50698 1461217 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,124.31 50699 1461219 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 29.80 50700 1461221 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,516.65 50701 1461216 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,749.99 50702 1461218 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 167.42 50703 1461220 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 937.22 50704 1458043 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 9,484.52 50705 1458044 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,755.95 50706 1461223 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 124.15- 50707 203588 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 13.66- 50708 203589 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 282.59- 50709 204180 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,878.19- 50710 204181 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 194.58- 50711 204182 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 79.80- 50712 202826 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 102.30- 50713 202825 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 59.35- 50714 202471 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5,888.95 51369 1464509 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 462.50 51370 1464505 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date CITY OF EDINA 10/9/02 13:54:55 Council Check Register Page - 17 1017/02 - 10/10/02 Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,282.32 51371 1464510 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,272.11 51372 1464508 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,256.80 51373 1464506 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 29.80 51374 1464516 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5,187.07 51375 1464514 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,724.81 51376 1464512 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 40,445.05 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 239361 10110102 ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 100919 JOHNSON, NAOMI ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 6.97 PETTY CASH 51294 100402 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES 12.93 PETTY CASH 51294 100402 16.37 PETTY CASH 51294 100402 19.82 PETTY CASH 51294 100402 40.84 PETTY CASH 51294 100402 42.67 PETTY CASH 51294 100402 137.81 PETTY CASH 51294 100402 277.41 239362 10/10/02 103230 JOHNSTONS SALES & SERVICE 63.74 VAC BAGS 51241 256907 63.74 239363 10110102 102603 JONAS, LENORE 328.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 51295 100402 328.00 239364 10/10/02 101514 KASPRICK, JOHN 12.39 PETTY CASH 51171 100202 18.75 PETTY CASH 51171 100202 31.14 239365 10/10/02 100845 KREMER SPRING & ALIGNMENT INC. 750.83 BOLTS, SHACKLES 51242 110218 750.83 239366 10/10/02 100846 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO 32.00 50715 341977 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 5110.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 5860.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 5860.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/9/02 13:54:55 Council Check Register 10/10/02 Page - 18 104819 LAFARGE ROAD MARKING 10n/02 - 10/10/02 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 840.05 50716 341976 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 367.45 50717 341884 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 105.00 50718 341883 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 2,355.50 51098 342117 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES PAVEMENT MARKINGS ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 3.700.00 239367 10/10/02 104819 LAFARGE ROAD MARKING 693.74 VALVE SOLENOID 51243 222874RI 1335.6406 693.74 239368 10/10/02 101778 LAKE COUNTRY SCHOOL 30.00 -. -- ADVERTISING 51296 100402 5110.6122 30.00 239369 10/10/02 100850 LAKELAND FLORIST 66.25 _ -_ - -- DISPLAY SUPPLIES 51244 466324 5440.6406 66.25 239370 10/10/02 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 80.43 SCREWS 51050 0137450 1322.6406 367.98 WASHERS, TY -RAP 51245 0165906 1553.6585 247.62 SELF DRILL SCREW ASST 51246 0165908 1646.6406 696.03 239371 10/10/02 106668 LEIERWOOD, MINA 125.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 51297 100402 5110.6103 125.00 239372 10/10102 102464 LIGHTING PLASTICS OF MINNESOTA 54.00 LIGHT COVERS 51172 090182 001 5420.6406 54.00 239373 10110102 100856 LINHOFF PHOTO 70.50 PHOTOS 51051 26627 1400.6408 70.50 239374 10110/02 103526 LOFFLER BUSINESS SYSTEMS 207.68 COPIER USAGE 51173 106663800 1640.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PAVEMENT MARKINGS ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date 239375 10/10102 Amount Vendor / Explanation 207.68 100858 LOGIS 30.20 42.80 171.22 299.63 368.62 1,043.89 1,225.48 1,809.85 2,332.56 2,660.08 3,499.85 3,912.78 7,739.95 30.17 62.85 85.47 102.57 170.95 213.68 368.04 384.63 1,053.16 1,807.02 2,232.37 2,328.91 3,494.37 3,906.65 7,727.83 30.17 125.69 368.03 427.36 1,400.15 CITY OF EDINA 10/9/02 13:54:55 Council Check Register Page - 19 1017102 - 10/10/02 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 51174 22003 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 51174 22003 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 51174 22003 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 51174 22003 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 51174 22003 2210.6160 DATA PROCESSING COMMUNICATIONS 51174 22003 1260.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEERING GENERAL 51174 22003 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 51174 22003 1495.6160 DATA PROCESSING INSPECTIONS 51174 22003 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 51174 22003 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 51174 22003 1190.6160 DATA PROCESSING ASSESSING 51174 22003 5910.6160 DATA PROCESSING GENERAL (BILLING) 51174 22003 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING FINANCE 51175 22081 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 51175 22081 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 51175 22081 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 51175 22081 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 51175 22081 5410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 51175 22081 45004.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PUBLIC SAFETY TRAINING FACILIT 51175 22081 2210.6160 DATA PROCESSING COMMUNICATIONS 51175 22081 4400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CITY HALUPOLICE BUILDING 51175 22081 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 51175 22081 1495.6160 DATA PROCESSING INSPECTIONS 51175 22081 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 51175 22081 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 51175 22081 1190.6160 DATA PROCESSING ASSESSING 51175 22081 5910.6160 DATA PROCESSING GENERAL (BILLING) 51175 22081 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING FINANCE 51176 22169 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 51176 22169 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 51176 22169 2210.6160 DATA PROCESSING COMMUNICATIONS 51176 22169 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 51176 22169 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING FINANCE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/9/02 13:54:55 Council Check Register Page - 20 10/7/02 — 10/10/02 Check # Date Amount Vendor I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,505.80 51176 22169 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,806.96 51176 22169 1495.6160 DATA PROCESSING INSPECTIONS 2,328.84 51176 22169 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 3,494.26 51176 22169 1190.6160 DATA PROCESSING ASSESSING 3,906.53 51176 22169 5910.6160 DATA PROCESSING GENERAL (BILLING) 7,727.59 51176 22169 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING FINANCE 72,226.96 239376 10/10/02 100443 LUCHT, PETE 60.00 CLASS REIMBURSEMENT 51052 100102 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 60.00 239377 10110102 100864 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. 127.25 END PLATE 51053 2025929 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 665.07 MANDREL, BROOM 51054 2025928 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 836.03 WATER PUMP 51055 2026170 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,628.35 239378 10/10/02 106661 MAGGIANO'SICORNER BAKERY INC. 1,102.03 - - DEPOSIT REFUND 51177 100202 1120.4314 INVESTIGATION FEE ADMINISTRATION 1,102.03 239379 10110/02 102828 MAIL HANDLING SERVICES 402.88 POSTCARD MAILING 51178 074124 5913.6575 PRINTING DISTRIBUTION 302.06- — -- POSTAGE CREDIT 51179 074125 5913.6575 PRINTING DISTRIBUTION 100.82 239380 10/10/02 102790 MAIRS, CANDYCE 282.50 SKATING INSTRUCTOR 51247 100302 5620.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINBOROUGH PARK 282.50 239381 10/10/02 105586 MALONEY, THERESA 42.00 SKATING INSTRUCTOR 51248 100302 5620.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINBOROUGH PARK 42.00 239382 10110102 100868 MARK VII SALES 1,569.40 50719 463013 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/9/02 13:54:55 Council Check Register Page - 21 10/7/02 -- 10/10/02 B Un't Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description us mess i 556.10 50720 460974 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,074.40 50721 463170 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 565.80 51099 463421 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,246.80 51100 463171 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 37.30 51101 463172 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,490.70 51102 463436 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 34.90 51103 463437 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 14.50 51377 465425 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,730.03 51378 465606 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,741.51 51379 465424 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 14,061.44 239383 10110/02 100095 MARTIN, KIM 416.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 51405 100402 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 416.00 239384 10/10/02 100870 MATRX 1,425.14 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 51322 792068 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,425.14 239385 10110102 106660 MCCOY, PHILIP 10.04 - AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 51180 100302 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 10.04 239386 10110/02 103195 MEDICARE PART B 362.22 - -- AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 51181 100302 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 362.22 239387 10110/02 105603 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS 3,646.50 ST. CROIX VALLEY 51182 092502 1628.4392.07 SENIOR TRIPS SENIOR CITIZENS 2,564.50 AUTUMN COLOR TOUR 51183 100202 1628.4392.07 SENIOR TRIPS SENIOR CITIZENS 6,211.00 239388 10/10/02 100953 MEDTRONIC PHYSIO CONTROL CORP. 900.96 LIFEPAK MAINTENANCE 51323 PC117191 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 156.82- CREDIT 51324 IV943367 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 744.14 239389 10/10102 105464 MEIXNER, DIANNE 88.40 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 51298 100402 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1017102 - 10110102 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subiedger Account Description 88.40 239390 10/10/02 101483 MENARDS 25.95 SUPPLIES 51184 60722 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL SUPPLIES PROTECTIVE CLOTHING 10/9/02 13:54:55 Page - 22 Business Unit MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING BUILDING MAINTENANCE LIQUOR YORK GENERAL ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS CENT SVC PW BUILDING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL SAC CHARGES INSPECTIONS 25.95 STREET RENOVATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 239391 10/10/02 102281 MENARDS 9.87 SCREWS, LUMBER 51249 57787 1646.6406 9.87 239392 10110/02 100882 MERIT SUPPLY 163.20 REPAIR PRESSURE WASHER 51056 60159 1552.6530 142.18 WASPIHORNET SPRAY 51057 60172 1552.6406 142.18 WASP /HORNET SPRAY 51057 60172 1646.6406 65.76 MOPHEADS 51185 60214 5840.6406 287.55 BATTERIES 51186 60220 5511.6406 240.48 LINERS, TISSUE 51250 60213 1552.6610 1,041.35 239393 10/10/02 101390 MES INC. 60.00 GAUGE 51325 092397 1470.6406 188.21 HELMET 51326 087803 1470.6552 248.21 239394 10/10/02 100886 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 1,188.00 SEPT. 2002 51187 100202 1495.4307 1,188.00 239395 10/10102 100891 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. 6,594.73 ASPHALT 51251 70532MB 1314.6518 6,594.73 239396 10110/02 100692 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLING COM 385.42 50722 66544107 5842.5515 198.84 51380 62570113 5822.5515 584.26 239397 10110102 103186 MIDWEST FUELS 680.74 GAS 51188 2165 5422.6581 GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL SUPPLIES PROTECTIVE CLOTHING 10/9/02 13:54:55 Page - 22 Business Unit MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING BUILDING MAINTENANCE LIQUOR YORK GENERAL ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS CENT SVC PW BUILDING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL SAC CHARGES INSPECTIONS BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 4, I. 172.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 10/10/02 239400 10/10/02 CITY OF EDINA _ 5,288.29 Council Check Register 63.84 BISQUE TILE 51058 1017/02 — 10/10/02 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 680.74 39.62 VALVE KIT. QUAD KIT 51253 0054130 -IN 1643.6530 REPAIR PARTS 239398 10110102 101122 MINNESOTA MONTHLY PUBLICATIONS 102174 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY -- 10.22 GAS MIX 51252 R109020165 5430.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MM18189 10.22 ADVERTISING OTHER 183.33 239399 10110/02 51059 105704 MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DIST 5842.6122 10/9/02 13:54:55 Page - 23 Business Unit RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 4.80 MAILING COSTS FOR PERMIT 51327 100702 4400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CITY HALUPOLICE BUILDING 4.80 172.00 239403 10/10/02 239400 10/10/02 102014 MINNESOTA CLAY USA _ 5,288.29 SEPT. 2002 51189 100202 1495.4380 SURCHARGE 63.84 BISQUE TILE 51058 86853 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 63.84 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER 39.62 VALVE KIT. QUAD KIT 51253 0054130 -IN 1643.6530 REPAIR PARTS 239401 10/10/02 101122 MINNESOTA MONTHLY PUBLICATIONS 39.62 239405 183.33 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 51059 MM18189 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 183.33 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 51059 MM18189 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 183.34 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 51059 MM18189 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 550.00 239402 10/10102 101559 MINNESOTA STATE FIRE CHIEFS AS ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 172 00 REGISTRATION FEE 51328 100402 1470.6104 CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL INSPECTIONS GENERAL TURF CARE GENERAL TURF CARE 167.79 MUSIC SERVICE 51255 A356830 5610.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT ED ADMINISTRATION 172.00 239403 10/10/02 100899 MINNESOTA STATE TREASURER _ 5,288.29 SEPT. 2002 51189 100202 1495.4380 SURCHARGE 5.288.29 239404 10/10/02 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER 39.62 VALVE KIT. QUAD KIT 51253 0054130 -IN 1643.6530 REPAIR PARTS 39.62 239405 10/10/02 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. _— 32.48 __ -- -32.48 BODY PACKAGE 51254 329648 -00 1643.6530 REPAIR PARTS 239406 10/10/02 100916 MUZAK INSPECTIONS GENERAL TURF CARE GENERAL TURF CARE 167.79 MUSIC SERVICE 51255 A356830 5610.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT ED ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1017/02 — 10/10/02 Check # Date Amount Vendor/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description FIRE PREVENTION 10/9/02 13:54:55 Page - 24 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS COMMUNICATIONS CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CONSTR. IN PROGRESS DARKROOM REMODEL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE PREVENTION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 167.79 239407 10110/02 106664 N. HENRY & SONS INC. _ 60_.00 BANNER 51329 100402 1470.6614 60.00 239408 10110/02 105314 NAGC _ 310.00 NAGC CONFERENCE 51342 2108 -24 2210.6104 310.00 239409 10110102 101108 NATIONAL CAMERA EXCHANGE 183.42 SUPPLIES 51060 0925201UROT 5110.6564 265.00 DARKROOM 51060 0925201URQT 5131.1705 448.42 239410 10110/02 106334 NELSON, PEGGY 1,286.00 INSTRUCTOR 51299 100402 5125.6103 1,286.00 239411 10110/02 106662 NET LITIN DISTRIBUTORS 136.85 BALLOONS 51256 15282 5110.6406 136.85 239412 10/10/02 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 1,284.00 51381 17576 5842.5513 871.00 51382 17575 5862.5513 2,155.00 239413 10/10102 104672 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 430.50 51061 909583317 1400.6188 430.50 239414 10/10/02 102551 NFPA 440.59 PUBLIC EDUCATION 51330 2098048Y 1470.6614 440.59 239415 10110/02 103327 NORTH CENTRAL RADAR 492.28 CALIBRATE RADAR 51062 NCR401 1400.6215 FIRE PREVENTION 10/9/02 13:54:55 Page - 24 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS COMMUNICATIONS CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CONSTR. IN PROGRESS DARKROOM REMODEL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE PREVENTION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/9/02 13:54:55 Council Check Register Page - 25 10/7/02 -- 10/10/02 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 492.28 239416 10/10/02 101620 NORTH SECOND STREET STEEL SUPP 60_.83 - -- —60.83 STEEL 51063 061261 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 239417 10/10/02 100925 NORTH STAR TURF 85.04 TIE ROD ENDS 51190 461176 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE 8 GROUNDS 85.04 239418 10/10102 101190 NORTHERN TRAFFIC SUPPLY INC. 177.86 CUSTOM SIGN 51064 22 -5826 5933.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PONDS & LAKES 177.86 239419 10/10/02 100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY 69.48 EASEL EXTENSIONS 51065 27494401 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 69.48 239420 10/10/02 102850 OFFICE DEPOT 100.88 6011565610019768 51129 092602 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 100.88 239421 10110/02 101592 OFFICEMAX CREDIT PLAN 127.78 6011584300016000 51257 092302 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 138.44 6011584300016000 51257 092302 5610.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ED ADMINISTRATION 266.22 239422 10/10/02 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 55.51 TREE PRUNER 51258 183722 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET REVOLVING 55.51 239423 10/10/02 106654 OPUS REAL ESTATE MINNESOTA 1 20,5_30.00 EASEMENT ACQUISITION 51191 100202 01318.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BA -318 W 77TH ST - PENTAGON PK 20,530.00 239424 10/10/02 100941 PARK NICOLLET CLINIC 173.35 ACCT 9992000066 51192 091602 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CITY OF EDINA 10/9/02 13:54:55 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 26 10!7102 - 10/10/02 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 257.40 ACCT 9992000066 51192 091602 1470.6175 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 430.75 239425 10110102 101718 PARTS PLUS 1,795.38 PARTS 51128 092602 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,795.38 239426 10110/02 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 938.20 50723 0199168 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 148.20 50724 0199286 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 55.41- 50725 0198207 -CM 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 145.00- 50726 0197657 -CM 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 24.00- 50727 0199322 -CM 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,470.60 51104 0199692 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 700.80 51383 0199694-IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 480.00 51384 0199659 -IN 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 351.00 51385 01997004N 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,019.80 51386 0199693 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 4,884.19 239427 10110102 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 169.75 51193 36794191 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 85.70 51387 34524620 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 255.45 239428 10/10/02 105806 PERFORMANCE KENNELS INC. 55.91 K -9 BOARDING 51066 456 1438.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES K -9 UNIT 55.91 239429 10/10102 100948 PERKINS LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS 1,951.75 BREDESEN PK TRAILS 51259 PO 1574 1647.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS PATHS & HARD SURFACE 1,951.75 239430 10110/02 105257 PHILLIPS SWAGER ASSOCIATES 446.06 RENOVATION 51067 325400 -10 5300.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET 446.06 239431 10110/02 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 151.35 50728 876389 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 0. r, R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1019/02 13:54:55 Council Check Register Page - 27 ADVERTISING OTHER MEETING EXPENSE ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CITY COUNCIL COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 1017102 -10/10/02 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,440.15 50729 876390 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,958.51 50730 876383 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 264.50 50731 876385 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 685.85 50732 876386 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 44.75 50733 876387 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,240.95 50734 876384 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 103.30- 50735 3266783 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 27.58- 50736 3266784 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 6.06- 50737 3266785 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 29.75- 50738 3266532 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 86.00 51105 876583 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 392.73 51388 878754 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 252.85 51389 878888 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 611.30 51390 878887 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5,526.30 51391 878753 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING ADVERTISING OTHER MEETING EXPENSE ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CITY COUNCIL COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 15,488.55 239432 10/10/02 103344 PHOENIX, THE 696.00 AD 51260 932352 5110.6122 696.00 239433 10/10/02 105875 PICKERMAN'S SOUP AND SANDWICHE 79.77 BOX LUNCHES 51194 092702 1100.6106 79.77 239434 10110/02 100119 PING 70.83 GOLF CLUB 51261 5930652 5440.5511 70.83 239435 10/10/02 102156 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING 970.49 50739 1193 5862.5515 6.00- 50740 1488 5862.5515 1,098.65 50741 861 - 5842.5515 1.80- 50742 889 5842.5515 1,087.23 50743 1341 5842.5515 12.97 51392 1796 5842.6406 ADVERTISING OTHER MEETING EXPENSE ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CITY COUNCIL COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/9/02 13:54:55 Council Check Register Page - 28 10/7102 -10/1 0/02 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 736.72 51392 1796 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 382.98 51393 1798 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 533.61 51394 1647 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 264.20 51395 1312 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5,079.05 239436 10/10/02 103256 POKORNY COMPANY 9.05 LIFT CHAIN 51262 19375 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 9.05 239437 10/10/02 100961 POSTMASTER 600.00 ABOUT BUSINESS POSTAGE 51068 100102 2210.6123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 600.00 239438 10/10/02 100961 POSTMASTER 380.00 POSTAGE 51345 100702 1628.6235 POSTAGE SENIOR CITIZENS 380.00 239439 10110/02 105931 POUNCE.COM 50.00 INTERNET SERVICE 51331 2001780 1627.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 50.00 239440 10/10/02 100962 PRECISION BUSINESS SYSTEMS 159.00 DICTATION UNITS 51069 073921 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 159.00 239441 10110/02 104424 PRIEDE, SOREN 288.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 51300 100402 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 288.00 239442 10/10/02 101032 PRINT SHOP, THE - -- 748.69 NEWSLETTER 51195 16840 1628.6575 PRINTING SENIOR CITIZENS 748.69 239443 10/10/02 100968 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 1,525.74 50744 602672 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING .70 51106 605179 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING #,„ `v R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Vendor/ Explanation 673.20 1,829.21 13.43- 784.20 2,665.44 7,458.64 239444 10/10/02 100546 PROTECTION PRODUCTS COMPANY 114.75 BARRICADE TAPE 51332 51689 1470.6406 114.75 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10/9/02 13:54:55 Page - 29 Business Unit VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 239445 10/10/02 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1017/02 - 10/10/02 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 51107 605227 5862.5513 51108 607048 5862.5513 51109 597071 5842.5513 51396 607052 5822.5513 51397 605228 5842.5513 51398 597049 5862.5513 7,458.64 239444 10/10/02 100546 PROTECTION PRODUCTS COMPANY 114.75 BARRICADE TAPE 51332 51689 1470.6406 114.75 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE GENERAL SUPPLIES 10/9/02 13:54:55 Page - 29 Business Unit VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 239445 10/10/02 101877 PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY 3.90 COBRA 10 -1 -02 51350 100702 1550.6040 HOSPITALIZATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 96.20 G. HUGHES 10 -1 -02 51350 100702 1550.6040 HOSPITALIZATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 518.70 - - - BASIC LIFE 10 -1 -02 51350 100702 1550.6040 HOSPITALIZATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 618.80 239446 10/10/02 100970 QUALITY REFRIGERATION INC 131.25 ICE MACHINE REPAIR 51263 152919 5421.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GRILL 131.25 239448 10/10/02 100971 QUALITY WINE 16.00- 50745 171728 -00 5840.4408 TRADE DISCOUNTS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 1,623.08 50745 171728 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2.72- 50746 171674 -00 5840.4408 TRADE DISCOUNTS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 273.84 50746 171674 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 47.10- 50747 168070 -00 5840.4408 TRADE DISCOUNTS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 4,746.89 50747 168070 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4.98- 51110 174355 -00 5840.4408 TRADE DISCOUNTS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 504.44 51110 174355 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4.56- 51111 174246 -00 5840.4408 TRADE DISCOUNTS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 461.87 51111 174246 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4.34- 51112 174356 -00 5820.4408 TRADE DISCOUNTS 50TH STREET GENERAL 436.93 51112 174356 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING .17- 51113 174245 -00 5820.4408 TRADE DISCOUNTS 50TH STREET GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/9/02 13:54:55 Council Check Register Page - 30 10!7102 - 10/10102 Check # Date Amount Vendor/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subtedger Account Description Business Unit 18.41 51113 174245-00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 16.56- 51114 174558 -00 5820.4408 TRADE DISCOUNTS 50TH STREET GENERAL 836.54 51114 174558 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 84.26- 51115 174557 -00 5840.4408 TRADE DISCOUNTS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 4,237.28 51115 174557 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 60.87- 51116 174566 -00 5840.4408 TRADE DISCOUNTS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 3,073.31 51116 174566 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 39.67- 51117 174495 -00 5840.4408 TRADE DISCOUNTS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 2,008.52 51117 174495 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 34.47- 51118 174244 -00 5860.4408 TRADE DISCOUNTS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 3,487.23 51118 174244 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 8.53- 51119 174354 -00 5860.4408 TRADE DISCOUNTS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 865.96 51119 174354 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 114.12- 51120 170809 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 74.97- 51399 174567 -00 5860.4408 TRADE DISCOUNTS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 3,783.75 51399 174567 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 65.08- 51400 170806 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 25,779.65 239449 10/10102 103512 QUIST, SUSAN 12.00 PETTY CASH 51351 100702 1438.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES K -9 UNIT 20.54 PETTY CASH 51351 100702 1460.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CIVILIAN DEFENSE 22.50 PETTY CASH 51351 100702 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 29.99 PETTY CASH 51351 100702 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 50.00 PETTY CASH 51351 100702 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 117.24 PETTY CASH 51351 100702 1400.6106 MEETING EXPENSE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 163.26 PETTY CASH 51351 100702 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 447.29 PETTY CASH 51351 100702 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 862.82 239450 10/10/02 100972 R&R SPECIALTIES INC _ 249.05 REPAIR SURFACER 51196 17301, 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 249.05 239451 10/10/02 103247 RAINS, DIANE 100.00 PERFORMANCE 10 -17 -02 51333 092402 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION • ` 1 40 R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date 239452 10110/02 239453 10110/02 239454 10/10/02 1019/02 13:54:55 Page - 31 Business Unit MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CLUB HOUSE BUILDING MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING GENERAL 50TH ST OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY RICHARDS GOLF COURSE VERNON OCCUPANCY MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CENTENNIAL LAKES CENT SVC PW BUILDING YORK FIRE STATION GOLF DOME PROGRAM CITY HALL GENERAL CLUB HOUSE SENIOR CITIZENS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER DISTRIBUTION BUILDING MAINTENANCE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 239455 10110102 106669 REZAK, JEREMY 100.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 51301 100402 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1017102 - 10/10/02 4mount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 100.00 100149 RED ROOSTER AUTO STORES 38.88 CUST B18105 51197 093002 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 586.15 CUST B18105 51197 093002 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 625.03 100975 RED WING SHOES 118.15 SAFETY BOOTS 51198 100202 5420.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 245.65 SAFETY BOOTS 51198 100202 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 314.50 SAFETY BOOTS 51198 100202 1260.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 678.30 100897 RELIANT ENERGY - MINNEGASCO 9.59 51131 093002 5821.6186 HEAT 9.59 51131 093002 5841.6186 HEAT 14.45 51131 093002 5430.6186 HEAT 18.16 51131 093002 5861.6186 HEAT 21.93 51131 093002 5422.6186 HEAT 22.99 51131 093002 5630.6186 HEAT 37.28 51131 093002 1552.6186 HEAT 38.69 51131 093002 1481.6186 HEAT 53.25 51131 093002 5210.6186 HEAT 64.82 51131 093002 1551.6186 HEAT 78.32 51131 093002 5420.6186 HEAT 94.55 51131 093002 1628.6186 HEAT 140.38 51131 093002 1470.6186 HEAT 158.80 51131 093002 5111.6186 HEAT 179.34 51131 093002 5911.6186 HEAT 524.68 51131 093002 5913.6186 HEAT 672.01 51131 093002 1646.6186 HEAT 3.740.52 51131 093002 5511.6186 HEAT 1019/02 13:54:55 Page - 31 Business Unit MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CLUB HOUSE BUILDING MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING GENERAL 50TH ST OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY RICHARDS GOLF COURSE VERNON OCCUPANCY MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CENTENNIAL LAKES CENT SVC PW BUILDING YORK FIRE STATION GOLF DOME PROGRAM CITY HALL GENERAL CLUB HOUSE SENIOR CITIZENS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER DISTRIBUTION BUILDING MAINTENANCE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 239455 10110102 106669 REZAK, JEREMY 100.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 51301 100402 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION r t• CITY OF EDINA 10/9/02 13:54:55 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 32 1017/02 — 10/10/02 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 100.00 239456 10110102 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 434.39 FURNACE REPAIR 51264 00126703 5420.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CLUB HOUSE 167.45 FURNACE REPAIR 51265 00126859 5422.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 601.84 239457 10/10102 106655 RON CLARK CONSTRUCTION 60.00 RENTAL REFUND 51199 100102 1628.4392.06 SENIOR CENTER RENTAL SENIOR CITIZENS 60.00 239458 10110102 102614 ROTARY CLUB OF EDINA _ 255.00 DUES 51200 85 1120.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION 255.00 239459 10110/02 105324 RT ELECTRIC 1,362.50 WIRE DARK ROOMS 51070 0544 5130.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS STORAGE SHED 1,362.50 239460 10110/02 100985 RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON EO CO INC 173.36 STEERING WHEEL, CAP 51266 C28555 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 173.36 239461 10110/02 100987 SA-AG INC 122.09 SAND 51071 25682 5913.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK DISTRIBUTION 122.09 239462 10/10102 100988 SAFETY KLEEN 109.22 WASTE DISPOSAL 51073 0021676922 1280.6271 HAZ. WASTE DISPOSAL SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD 109.22 239463 10/10/02 101431 SCAN AIR FILTER 339.84 AIR FILTERS 51072 80220 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 339.84 239464 10110/02 105442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO. 55.53 SHED 51074 339250 5130.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS STORAGE SHED r t• . 0 .0 YORK SELLING 117.23 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 239465 10110/02 CITY OF EDINA 101961 SCHMITZ THOMAS R55CKREG LOG20000 265.76 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 51201 100102 Council Check Register 265.76 10!7102 - 10/10102 239466 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 22.85 PLYWOOD 51267 348252 1646.6577 LUMBER 6.51 LUMBER 51268 344597 1646.6577 LUMBER 4.65 LUMBER 51269 343443 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 2769 STAKES 51270 343444 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 4505.6103 5410.6406 4501.6710 4505.6103 5440.5511 4601.6710 1470.6103 1400.6103 5842.5514 5842.5515 5822.5515 5822.5514 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 10/9/02 13:54:55 Page - 33 Business Unit BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE MN TECHNICAL RESCUE SCHOOL GOLF ADMINISTRATION FIRE DEPARTMENT MN TECHNICAL RESCUE SCHOOL COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE FORFEITURE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 117.23 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 239465 10110/02 101961 SCHMITZ THOMAS 265.76 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 51201 100102 265.76 239466 10/10/02 102644 SEABOARD PENCIL COMPANY 538.10 PENCILS 51271 9149 538.10 239467 10/10/02 105589 SHAW CONTRACT FLOORING SERVICE 2,190.17 FLOORING 51334 22435910 2,190.17 239468 10110102 101201 SIEMS, JEFFERY - _ 176.91 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 51202 100102 176.91 239469 10/10/02 106663 SONARTEC 674.20 GOLF CLUBS 51272 8082 -IN 674.20 239470 10/10/02 103109 SOUTH DALE SINCLAIR 300.00 TOWING 51075 1353 75.00 TOWING 51335 1353. 275.00 TOWING 51335 1353. 650.00 239471 10110/02 101002 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS INC 3,087.00 51121 134005 25.90 51122 134006 11.55 51123 134000 1,111.00 51124 134001 4505.6103 5410.6406 4501.6710 4505.6103 5440.5511 4601.6710 1470.6103 1400.6103 5842.5514 5842.5515 5822.5515 5822.5514 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 10/9/02 13:54:55 Page - 33 Business Unit BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE MN TECHNICAL RESCUE SCHOOL GOLF ADMINISTRATION FIRE DEPARTMENT MN TECHNICAL RESCUE SCHOOL COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE FORFEITURE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 139.91 CITY OF EDINA 51273 292701 5440.5511 Council Check Register PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 10/7/02 - 10/10/02 Check # Date Amount Vendor/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 4,235.45 239474 10/10/02 239472 10/10/02 106324 ST. PAUL, THE 101021 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LLC 118.01 PROPANE 51076 092602 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 118.01 PREMIUM 51203 239473 10110/02 1550.6200 101462 SPORT - HALEY INC. CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 10/9/02 13:54:55 Page - 34 Business Unit GENERAL MAINTENANCE a4b 139.91 VESTS 51273 292701 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 139.91 239474 10/10/02 106324 ST. PAUL, THE 38,713.83 PREMIUM 51203 091102 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 38,713.83 239475 10/10/02 100715 STANTON GROUP 821.50 FEE FOR SERVICE 51204 329240 1550.6040 HOSPITALIZATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 821.50 239476 10/10102 101007 STAR TRIBUNE 724.15 -- WANT AD 51336 093002 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 724.15 239477 10110/02 101015 STREICHERS 220.25 GUN CASE 51077 320134.1 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 106.39 FLASHER LIGHTS 51078 319329.1 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 373.80 EQUIPMENT INSTALLATION 51079 319644.1 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 700.44 239478 10110102 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 23.69 HANDLE 51274 247067CVW 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 23.69 239479 10/10/02 102140 SUN MOUNTAIN SPORTS INC. 76.47 GOLF BAG 51275 371150 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 76.47 239480 10/10/02 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 46.47 PUBLISH NOTICE 51205 541631 1120.4314 INVESTIGATION FEE ADMINISTRATION a4b R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1017102 -- 10/10/02 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 46.47 239481 10/10/02 103586 THORNTON, PATRICIA 187.00 CLASS REFUND 51337 100302 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION 10/9/02 13:54:55 Page - 35 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 187.00 VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL REPAIR PARTS 239482 10/10/02 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 105.50 50748 275159 5862.5515 5,012.20 50749 275158 5862.5514 155.00 51276 235175 5421.5514 5,272.70 239483 10110102 101039 TOTAL TOOL 1,593.75 HOIST INSPECTION 51080 7102796 1552.6530 1.593.75 239484 10110102 100506 TURK, MIROSLAVA 450.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTOR 51302 100402 5125.6103 450.00 239485 10110/02 103121 TURTLE BAY BUILDING SERVICE IN 985.13 CLEANING 51277 1662 5620.6103 985.13 239486 10/10102 103981 TWIN CITY OFFICE SUPPLY INC. 481.39 OFFICE 81ST AID SUPPLIES 51278 359386 -0 5111.6406 481.39 239487 10110/02 100363 U.S. BANK 117.13 BEST BUY 51338 100402 1470.6406 119.95 THE FIRE STORE 51338 100402 1470.6552 237.08 239488 10/10/02 103048 U.S. BANK TRUST NATIONAL ASSOC 200.00 ADMIN FEE 51346 CTS00337533 5410.6103 200.00 239489 10/10/02 103248 ULLRICH, CINDY 70.52 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 51279 100402 5610.6107 10/9/02 13:54:55 Page - 35 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINBOROUGH PARK GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PROTECTIVE CLOTHING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GOLF ADMINISTRATION MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ED ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/9/02 13:54:55 Council Check Register Page - 36 1017/02 — 10/10/02 Check # Date _ Amount Vendor/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 70.52 _- - -- 239490 10110/02 101280 UNITED HORTICULTURAL SUPPLYIUA 486.60 FERTILIZER 51280 0546514 5630.6540 FERTILIZER CENTENNIAL LAKES 486.60 239491 10110/02 104466 UNITED MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS 133.65 ROLL TOWELS 51281 45326 5620.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 133.65 239492 10110/02 101338 VALLIERE, JOHN 210.87 LAMPS 51206 100102 5451.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS CLUBHOUSE ADDITION 210.87 239493 10110/02 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 268.38 CAN LINERS 51081 443172 1645.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LITTER REMOVAL 268.38 239494 10110102 102970 VERIZON WIRELESS BELLEVUE 32_.93 ACCT 1003 - 1363529 51282 092002 5610.6188 TELEPHONE ED ADMINISTRATION 32.93 239495 10/10/02 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 384.00 CART RENTAL 51082 11248 5423.6216 LEASE LINES GOLF CARS 960.00 CART RENTAL 51083 11230 5423.6216 LEASE LINES GOLF CARS 1,344.00 239496 10/10102 105269 VERTICAL SYSTEMS INC. 360.00 SUPPORT AGREEMENT 51084 9815043 5913.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE DISTRIBUTION 360.00 239497 10/10102 106657 VINING, VIRGINIA 15.00 LINE DANCE REFUND 51207 100302 1628.4392.09 SENIOR SPECIAL EVENTS SENIOR CITIZENS 15.00 239498 10110102 101071 WALLIN, JOHN 316.32 GFOA CONFERENCE 51208 100302 1160.6104 CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS FINANCE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1019/02 13:54:55 Council Check Register Page - 37 10/7102 - 10/10/02 Check # Date Amount Vendor/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 316.32 239499 10110/02 100762 WALSER BLOOMINGTON DODGE 823.04 GEAR, PUMP POWER 51286 61919DOW 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 823.04 239500 10/10/02 101223 WALSER FORD 561.96 BRAKE SHOE KITS 51209 104035WFOW 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 18.00 WHEEL NUTS 51283 104059WFOW 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 7.89 WHEEL NUTS 51284 104016WFOW 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 31.18 SHOCK ABSORB ASSEMBLY 51285 104036WFOW 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 619.03 239501 10/10/02 103466 WASTE MANAGEMENT - SAVAGE MN 2,525.37 REFUSE 51085 18347562282 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 2,750.38 REFUSE 51347 18441202282 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 5,275.75 239502 10110102 101077 WEST WELD SUPPLY CO. 291.10 WELDING SUPPLIES 51210 49745 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 291.10 239503 10110102 106001 WESTMARK, MICHELLE 225.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTOR 51404 100402 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 225.00 239504 10/10/02 101078 WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT 94.79 PLATES 51211 0017262 -IN 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 643.87 FLEET KEYS 51212 0017261 -IN 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 738.66 239505 10110/02 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 39.68- 50750 085657 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 84.95- 51125 086056 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5.33- 51126 086409 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,223.40 51401 086529 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 97.35 51402 086647 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation 1,242.45 2,433.24 239506 10/10/02 101312 WINE MERCHANTS CITY OF EDINA 1019/02 13:54:55 Council Check Register Page - 38 1017/02 — 10/10/02 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 51403 086530 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 239507 10110/02 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 50751 62327 50752 62328 50753 124954 51127 125156 239508 10/10102 YORK SELLING 101726 XCEL ENERGY COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1,369.51 5842.5513 51213 092702 1,369.51 239509 10/10/02 103584 XPEDX MINNEAPOLIS 1,477.50 ABOUT TOWN PAPER 51086 19344460 1,477.50 239510 10110102 102960 ZUHRAH SHRINE FLAMES 100.00 PERFORMANCE 10 -13 -02 51339 092402 100.00 239511 10/10/02 103709 ARM OF MINNESOTA 100.00 ARM /ACI COURSE 51568 100802 100.00 239512 10/10/02 103709 ARM OF MINNESOTA 300.00 ARM /ACI COURSE 51569 100902 300.00 239513 10110102 101395 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION 400.00 BITUMINOUS ST. I TRAINING 51570 100902 400.00 239514 10/10/02 102229 LAKE SUPERIOR COLLEGE 1,250.00 TRAINING 51571 100902 �r Fi 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1551.6185 LIGHT & POWER CITY HALL GENERAL 2210.6123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 1260.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ENGINEERING GENERAL 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Vendor / Explanation 1,250.00 239515 10/10/02 101575 MUNICI -PALS _105.00 FALL 2002 MEETING 105.00 822,442.09 Grand Total CITY OF EDINA 1019/02 13:54:55 Council Check Register Page - 39 1017/02 — 10/10/02 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 51572 100902 1550.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 822,442.09 Total Payments 822,442.09 R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/9/02 13:58:44 Council Check Summary Page - 1 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 452,138.49 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 4,392.66 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 25.678.31 04800 CONSTRUCTION FUND 46,382.80 05100 ART CENTER FUND 11,769.42 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 103.58 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 638.80 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 27,987.16 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 7,623.11 05600 EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND 3,889.04 05800 LIQUOR FUND 177,459.33 05900 UTILITY FUND 20,096.28 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 13,864.51 05950 RECYCLING FUND 30,418.60 Report Totals 822,442.09 I@ F.:" VID 1017/02 - 10/10102 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policies and M. Ir107■ . meT ■iiLi ✓WAS LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR TRANSPORTATION FORUM Tuesday, October 29, 2002 7:30 — 9:00 AM Minneapolis Airport Marriott 2020 East 79th Street Bloomington, MN $25 per person advance registration $30 per person at the door Featuring 2002 Lieutenant Governor candidates: Carol Molnau (IR) Martha Robertson (Independence Party) Julie Sabo (DFL). MAWWIAN. Mm_ Moving South Metro Transportation Projects Forward MOVE is a coalition of business, industry and municipal leaders concerned about the growing needs and continued lack of investment in the south metro area. The mission of MOVE is to speed up transportation system funding and quickly move people and goods through the entire Twin Cities metro area. This forum has been planned with the following event partners: Burnsville Chamber of Commerce/Golden Triangle Transportation Management Association (GTTMA) /Greater Minneapolis Chamber, Bloomington Airport Council/Eden Prairie Chamber of Commerce/Edina Chamber of Commerce/Lakeville Chamber of Commerce/Northern Dakota County Chamber of Commerce/Twin West Chamber of Commerce. Tuesday, October 29, 2002 7:30 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. Cost: $25 (includes hot breakfast) Marriott Airport Hotel, Bloomington, MN. The 2002 Lieutentant Governor Transportation Forum will focus on the mounting transportation needs of the south metropolitan area. At the present time there are more than $2 billion of unfunded transportation projects on existing south metro area roadways and bridges, and no new monies for any projects scheduled within the seven - county metropolitan area beyond the year 2020. Participation is limited to 100 seats, registration deadline is Wednesdav, October 23, 2002. Register today to make sure you don't miss this exciting opportunity to hear firsthand how our candidates for Lieutenant Governor and their running mates plan to provide sufficient funding for the future of the south metro area's transportation system needs! Registrations, payments received after 10/23/02 or those without pre- registration by mail will be assessed an additional $5 fee at the door. Name: Organization: Amount due: $ ❑ Check enclosed Address: ❑ Check to follow by mail City State Zip ❑ Pay at door ($30 per person) Phone: (� Fax (_� Please make checks payable to: MOVE E -mail Eden Prairie, 55344 MOVE is a non-profit 501c6 charitable organization and membership is tax deductible. FAX (952) 944 -0951 Questions? Call (612) 819 -1743 60 Assodation of 2002 P Metropolitan Munidpalities Adoption Meeting When: Thursday, Nov. 7, 200215 - 7 p.m. Where: League of Minnesota Cities Building (LMC) 145 University Ave, W., Stt, Paul, MN The Policy Adoption Meeting is one of two major meetings the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities (AMM) holds each year for YOU -- the membership. Allmayors, councilmembers, managers and administrators, as well as city staff are welcome to attend.. A 45- minute social featuring light hors d'oeuvres will begin at 5 p.m., followed by the business meeting from 5-45- 7 p.m. There is NO charge to attend the social and /or meeting, This is your opportunity to debate and adoptAMM's 2003 Legislative Policies and to determine the top pnorityissues that AMM will spend much of Its time and resources on during the 2003 Legislative Session. Cities are encouraged to send more than one representative to contribute to the policy discussion. Vote on AMMs 2003 Legislative Policies, Determine AMM' 2003 lobbying priorities Network with your metropolitan peers K Enclosed is a copy of the draft policies that the membership will be voting on. The draft policies were developed by our four policy committees and approved by the Board of Directors at their last meeting. A two- thirds vote of those members attending the Policy Adoption Meeting is required to adopt ohicial AMMpolicy. Please R.S. VP by calling Laurie Jennings at 651 - 215 -4000 by Friday, Oct. 25. 145UrnversitvAve. W. ♦st. Paul, MN 551031 Phone: 651 - 215 -40001 Fax. -651- 281 -12991 Email.-amm @amm145.org This Ayer has been mailed to allAMM mayors, councilmembers and managers /administrators LMC Building Association of Metropolitan Municipalities (AMM) 145 University Ave. W. ♦ St. Paul, Minnesota 55103 Phone: 651215 -40001 Far 651- 181 -1299 Email.- amm@amml45.org Highway 36 Maryland Ave. Sherburne Ave. �C University Ave. State Capitol }, Office cn oc C Bldg. w 1 -94 `L"' Located one -half mile north of 1 -94 at the corner of Rice Street and University Avenue. Please park in the west parking lot and enter the building through the west entrance. J � January 2003 �C 1 Legislative POLICIES Association of Metropolitan Municipalities 145 University Ave. W. ♦ St. Paul, Minnesota 55103 -2044 Phone: (651) 215 -4000 ♦ Fax: (651) 281 -1299 E-mail:amm@amm145.org r �� -Printed on recycled paper Table of Contents Municipal Revenue & Taxation (1) -A Levy Limits ........................................................................ ............................... 1 -B Local Government Aid ....................................................... ............................... 1 I -C Sales Tax on Local Government Purchases ....................... ............................... 1 -D Price of Government .......................................................... ............................... 2 I -E Fiscal Disparity Fund Distribution ...................................... ............................... 2 -F Personal Property Taxation: Electric Utility ......................... ............................... 2 I-G Revenue Diversification ..................................................... ............................... 2 I-H Class Rate Tax System ...................................................... ............................... 2 NLimited Market Value ......................................................... ............................... 2 W City Revenue Stability & Fund Balance .............................. ............................... 3 -K Public Employees' Retirement Association (PERA) Under - Funding .................. 3 -L Aggregate Mining Fee ....................................................... ............................... 3 -M State Property Tax: Oppose Extension to Other Property .... ............................... 3 General Legislation II -A Mandates & Local Authority ............................................... ............................... 5 II -B Public Right -of -Way ........................................................... ............................... 5 II-C 911 Telephone Tax ............................................................. ............................... 5 II -D 800 MHz Radio System ..................................................... ............................... 5 II -E Permit Approval: Zoning /Denial Findings ........................... ............................... 6 II -F PERA Opt -in for City Managers ......................................... ............................... 6 II-G Compensation Limits ........................................................ ............................... 6 II-H State Paid Police and Fire Medical Insurance .................... ............................... 6 Housing & Economic Development (III) III -A City Role in Housing .......................................................... ............................... 7 III -B City Role in Lifecycle and Affordable Housing ................... : ............................... 7 III-C Livable Communities ......................................................... ............................... 8 III -D Inclusionary Housing .......................................................... ............................... 8 III -E State Role in Affordable Housing ....................................... ............................... 9 III -F Federal Role in Affordable Housing ................................... ............................... 9 III-G Economic Development Responsibilities ......................... ............................... 10 III -H Tax Increment Financing (TIF) .......................................... ............................... 10 IIN State Role in Redevelopment/ Reinvestment ........................ .............................11 III,1 Authority to Issue Capital Improvement Bonds ..................... .............................11 III -K "This Old Shop .. .................................................................. .............................11 2003 Legislative Policies i Contents Metropolitan Agencies (IV) IV -A Purpose of Metropolitan Governance ............................... ............................... 13 IV-13 Roles & Responsibilities of the Metropolitan Council ........ ............................... 13 IV -C Selection of Metropolitan Council Members ..................... ............................... 14 IV -D Funding Regional Services .............................................. ............................... 14 IV -E Regional Systems ........................................................... ............................... 14 IV -F Review of Local Comprehensive Plans ............................ ............................... 15 IV -G Local Zoning Authority ..................................................... ............................... 15 IV H Implementation of Blueprint 2030 .................................... ............................... 15 N -I Comprehensive Planning Schedule ................................. ............................... 16 IV-J Adjacent Counties ........................................................... ............................... 16 IV -K Natural Resource Protection ............................................ ............................... 17 IV -L Water Management ......................................................... ............................... 17 IV -M Funding Regional Parks & Open Space .......................... ............................... 18 Transportation (V) V -A Transportation Funding .................................................... ............................... 19 V -B Regional Transit System .................................................. ............................... 19 V -C Road Access Fee ..............................:............................ ............................... 20 V -D Transportation Utility ........................................................ ............................... 20 V -E Highway Tumbacks & Funding ............:::.......................... ............................... 20 V -F '3C' Transportation Planning Process: Elected Officials Role .......................... 20 V -G Motion Imaging Recording System (M.I.R.S.): Traffic Law Compliance ............ 21 V -H Airport Noise Mitigation ................................................... ............................... 21 V-1 Cities Under 5,000 Population ....................... .................. ............................... V -J County State Aid Highway (CSAH) Distribution Formula .. ............................... 21 V -K Municipal Input (Consent) forTrunk Highwyas ................... ............................... 22 V -L Municipal State Aid Rules for Urban Road Systems ......... ............................... 22 Committee Rosters Housing and Economic Development Policy Committee ............ ............................... 23 Metropolitan Agencies Policy Committee ................................... ............................... 23 Municipal Revenue Policy Committee ......................................... ............................... 24 Transportation and General Government Policy Committee ........ ............................... 24 ii Association of Metropolitan Municipalities Municipal Revenue & Taxation (I) I A Levy Limits The AMM strongly opposes levy limits and urges the legislature to not re-enact them for 2004 and beyond. The AMM also opposes the imposition of artificial mechanisms such as valuation freezes, payroll freezes, reverse referenda, super majority requirements for levy, or other limitations to the local government budget and taxing process. Expenditures for capital improvements such as infrastructure reconstruction should not be subject to levy limits. 1 -13 Local Government Aid (LGA) AMM supports the continuation of Local Government Aid (LGA), which provides for revenue sharing between cities and the state, compensates cities for the cost of carrying -out state mandates and helps provide all Minnesotans with an adequate level of basic public services at a reasonable cost. However, the program should be revised so that: ♦ the formula is simpler and easier to understand and communicate; ♦ the formula better reflects city "need," and utilizes more reasonable need/ability -to -pay criteria; ♦ a portion of the funds are distributed on a per capita basis; ♦ there is an established mechanism by which the total amount of money appropriated for LGA grows with inflation and the economy. Given the fact that the 2001 Omnibus Tax Bill increased the appropriation for LGA by $140 million, no city should have received less LGA in 2002 than they did in 2001. Therefore, if the Legislature elects not to undertake an in -depth review and updating of the LGA formula, it should, at the very least, return those cities that lost LGA to their 2001 LGA levels. This will cost less than $4 million. Also, the legisla- ture needs to determine which census, 1990 or 2000, more accurately reflects the actual percentage of pre -1940 housing, since it is improbable that pre -1940 housing could increase in 270 cities. I -C Sales Tax on Local Government Purchases The legislature should reinstate the sales tax exemption for all local government purchases without requiring a reduction in other aids. 2003 Legislative Policies 1 Revenue & Taxation I -D Price of Government The price of government calculation in regard to local governments should be based on (1) changes in the sum of the levy and state aids, and (2) examination of long -term trends, not single year events. In addition, consideration should be given to service provision transfers between governmental units, increased demand for services by citizens and legislative mandates or tax rate changes. I -E Fiscal Disparity Fund Distribution The AMM opposes the use of fiscal disparities to fund social or physical metropolitan programs since it results in a metropolitan-wide property tax increase hidden from the public. I -F Personal Property Taxation: Electric Utility The AMM opposes proposals for exempting Investor Owned Utilities (IOUs) from the personal property tax. Under no circumstances should local units of government and their taxpayers be required to shoulder the burdens of tax relief for IOUs. The personal property tax is a significant portion of the metropolitan fiscal disparity pool and, if elimi- nated, would have a metropolitan-wide property tax impact. I-G Revenue Diversification The AMM supports revenue diversification for cities in order to reduce reliance on the property tax. The AMM opposes legislated reduction or limitation of various license fees, development fees or other general fees which would force increased property taxes to pay for related services. 1 -H Class Rate Tax System The AMM opposes a change from the class rate tax system to a market value system, which would cause tremendous shifts of tax burden between classes of property, or applying future levy increases to market value, since this would fiarther complicate the property tax system. 14 Limited Market Value (LMV) The AMM strongly opposes extension of artificial limits in valuing property at market for taxation purposes to additional property classes since such limitations shift tax burdens to other classes of property and create disparities between properties of equal value. The Legislature should monitor the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities Revenue & Taxation effects of the LMV phase -out to avoid excessive tax burden increases to currently benefiting properties. The AMM believes that enhanced targeting for special circumstances better serves the tax system. W City Revenue Stability & Fund Balance The state should not attempt to control or restrict city fund balances. These funds are necessary to maintain fiscal viability, meet unexpected or emergency resource needs, purchase capital goods and infrastructure, provide adequate cash flow and maintain high -level bond ratings. 1 -K Public Employees' Retirement Association (PERA) Under - Funding The 2001 legislature increased employer and employee contributions to PERA by 0.35 percent each, made some administrative changes in qualification, and extended the amortization period from 20 to 30 years to deal with PERA's long -term funding deficiency. Recent analysis has indicated that some of the trends leading to the deficiency have slowed or possibly reversed. The state should carefully analyze future actuarial reports and experience studies to determine if the 2001 contribution rate increases and plan modifications are sufficient to cover the plan's deficiency. The state should assist local governments in covering any deficiency that may still exist. I -L Aggregate Mining Fee In order to provide an incentive for the extraction of local aggregate resources prior to urbanized development and in order to help offset the negative impacts of aggregate mining on local communities, the state should authorize cities and townships to collect a host community fee of not less than 30 cents per ton from the operators of aggregate mines, with the fee proceeds to be deposited in the municipality's general fund I -M State Property Tax: Oppose Extension to Other Property The 2001 Property Tax Reform Act shifted general education funding to the state, and funded it, in part, with a state property tax on commerical/industrial and cabin property. Since cities' only source of general funds is the property tax, AMM would oppose extension of a state levied property tax to additional classes ofproperty. 2003 Legislative Policies 3 Revenue & Taxation 4 Association of Metropolitan Municipalities General Legislation 11-A Mandates & Local Authority The AMM opposes statutory changes which erode local control and authority or create mandated additional tasks requiring new or added local costs without a corresponding state appropriation or funding mechanism. New unfunded mandates cause increased property taxes which impede cities' ability to fund traditional service needs. II -13 Public Right -of -Way The AMM supports the continued effort of the League of Minnesota Cities (LMC) to protect the authority of cities to maintain jurisdiction over municipal public rights -of -way, to establish relevant criteria and to obtain reasonable compensation for its degradation and to retain franchise and fee collection authority for gas, electric and cable services. II-C 911 Telephone Tax The AMM supports an increase in the current charge per phone line 911 access fee to provide neces- sary and mandated upgrades and modifications to 911 systems in public safety answering point (PSAP) locations throughout the state. This fee increase is needed to maintain reliable emergency communication services and to comply with the FCC mandate for cell phone automated location identification. The increased funds should be distributed to the local PSAPs in a fair and appropriate manner. The Legisla- ture should also restore the Commissioner of Administration's authority to establish the surcharge amount. II -D 800 MHz Radio System The AMM supports the continuation of the Metropolitan 800 MHz Radio System legislation and board, as long as cities are not forced to modify their current systems or become part of the 800 MHz Radio System until they so choose. The system should provide a phased transition guaranteeing uninterrupted service and be technically capable of allowing communities the flexibility to form various coordinated arrangements for dispatching and service provision. In that one of the prime advantages of this system is the fact that local public safety agencies and other units of local government throughout the region will be able to communicate with each other, regional funding of the entire system should be considered. 2003 Legislative Policies General Legislation II -E Permit Approval: Zoning /Denial Findings The permit approval statute delineating time limit requirements should be modified so that in the case of a residential to commercial rezoning requiring a super -maj ority vote, a motion to table (simple maj ority) that extends action beyond the 60 day time requirement constitutes a denial. Current law provides automatic approval if no action is taken. In addition, if an approval resolution fails for any permit request, the city should be allowed, by statute, to provide a denial resolution with findings of fact at the next regular meeting or granted an automatic time limit extension. II -F PERA Opt -In for City Managers In 1981, when vesting was at 10 years, city managers were allowed to opt -out of PERA since many did not stay at their positions for a full ten years. Now that vesting in PERA is three years, city managers should be allowed to opt back in to PERA. II-G Compensation Limits The Legislature should acknowledge that all state and local governments, not just school districts, must be competitive in recruiting and retaining upper level management employees. In addition, there is no correlation between the compensation of citizen volunteers and career public sector professionals. Therefore, the state should repeal or modify laws limiting the compensation of a person employed by a statutory or home rule charter city to the governor's salary. II -H State Paid Police and Fire Medical Insurance ♦ The state must fully fund programs that pay for health insurance for police and fire employees required under M.S. 299A.465, as amended in 1997, for police and fire employees hurt or killed in the line of duty. ♦ The Legislature must clarify whether M.S. 299A.465 applies to injuries incurred prior to June 1, 1997 (the effective date of the law). ♦ The Legislature must clarify the amount of an employer's contribution under M.S. 299A.465 and whether it changes over time. ♦ The Legislature must identify a single public entity as the authority for making the disability determi- nation for purposes of the benefits assigned under M.S. 299A.465, establish the minimum criteria used to determine ability to work, and set a percentage threshold of disability for eligibility into this program. Association of Metropolitan Municipalities Housing &Economic Development (III) Introduction While the provision of housing is predominantly a private - sector, market -drive activity; all levels of government – federal, state and local – have a role to play in facilitating the production and preservation of affordable housing in Minnesota. AMM's housing policies recognize the intergovernmental nature of this issue — starting with policies A through D, which outline the role of cities. Cities are responsible for much of the ground -level housing policy in Minnesota– including land -use planning, building code enforcement, and often times, the packaging of financial incentives. However, the state must also play a major role by empowering local units of government and providing a variety of funding programs and tools. Policy E addresses the state's responsibility to provide financial resources and establish a general direction for housing policy. Finally, policy F speaks to the urgent need for the federal government to increase its financial support for the production and preservation of affordable housing. III -A City Role in Housing In the state of Minnesota, the provision of housing is predominantly a private sector, market - driven activity. However, all cities facilitate the development of housing via responsibilities in the areas of land - use planning, zoning ordinances and subdivision regulations and many cities choose to play an additional role by providing financial incentives and regulatory relief, participating in state and regional housing programs and supporting either local or county -wide Housing and Redevelopment Authorities. Cities are also responsible for ensuring the health and safety of local residents and the structural soundness and livability of the local housing stock via building permits and inspections. AMM strongly opposes any effort to reduce, alter or interfere with cities' authority to carry out these functions in a locally determined manner. III -B City Role in Lifecycle and Affordable Housing AMM supports lifecycle and affordable housing and recognizes that it is key to the economic and social well being of individual communities and the region. Cities can facilitate the production and preservation of lifecycle and affordable housing by: ♦ Applying for funding from applicable grant and loan programs; 2003 Legislative Policies 7 Housing and Economic Development ♦ Working with developers and local residents to blend affordable housing into new and existing neighborhoods; ♦ Expediting review processes; and ♦ Working to reduce locally - imposed development costs. III -C Livable Communities The Livable Communities Act (LCA) program operated by the Metropolitan Council provides a voluntary, incentive -based approach to affordable housing development, brownfield clean-up and mixed -used, transit - friendly development/redevelopment. AMM strongly supports the continuation of this approach, which has been widely accepted and is fully utilized by local communities. Currently the LCA program is primarily funded via a Metropolitan Council property tax levy, which is subject to levy limits. AMM supports the loosening or removal ofthese levy limits as well as the appropriation of additional state funds for this program in order to allow it to more fully meet the dem- onstrated need that currently exists in the metropolitan area. Use of interest earnings from LCA funds should be limited to covering the costs of administering the program. Remaining interest earnings not used for program administration should be considered part of the LCA funds and used to fund grant requests from the established LCA accounts, according to established funding criteria. The Metropolitan Council, in cooperation with the LCA participants, should develop a benchmark to measure a city's efforts in regards to affordable housing. The benchmark should replace the Affordable Life -Cycle Housing Opportunity Amount (ALHOA). III -D Inclusionary Housing AMM supports the location of affordable housing in residential and mixed -use neighborhoods through- out a city and would support enabling legislation that authorizes cities to utilize new and innovative means of achieving this goal. However, AMM does not support passage of a mandatory inclusionary housing law that would require a certain percentage of units in all new housing developments to be affordable to households at a particular income level. Advocates of a mandatory inclusionary housing law often point to its use in Montgomery County, Maryland. However, AMM does not believe the situation or experiences of Montgomery County are broadly applicable or transferable to the Twin Cities metropolitan region, given this area's development stage, housing market and state - local government structure. Furthermore, a close look at the Mont- gomery County experience shows that the production of affordable housing units has fallen- offsignifi- cantly from the levels achieved in the mid- 1980's to the point where, today, it is not achieving large - scale production of affordable housing units. Association of Metropolitan Municipalities Housing and Economic Development Mandatory inclusionary housing policies are based on the assumption that in every new housing devel- opment cities are capable of providing enough regulatory relief, via things such as density bonuses and/ or fee waivers, for the developer to produce below market rate units without a direct financial subsidy or cross - subsidization from the other houses in the development. While AMM does believe there are cost savings to be achieved through regulatory reform, density bonuses, and fee waivers, AMM does not believe a mandatory inclusionary housing approach can achieve the desired levels of affordability solely through these steps. III -E State Role in Affordable Housing By establishing and funding statewide housing programs, to be administered by the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency (MICA), the legislature establishes a general direction/prioritization for the state on housing issues. The state's financial support of homeless shelters, transitional housing, supportive senior housing, and low- income family housing is essential to communities throughout the state and should be continued. In recent years, the State of Minnesota has been an active partner in addressing lifecycle and affordable housing issues. However, AMM believes the state's continued, and increased, participation is essential to addressing this ongoing issue. Therefore, the state should: ♦ Increase funding for MHFA's development and redevelopment, supportive housing and housing preservation programs and appropriate new funds to help establish affordable housing land trusts. ♦ Modify the property tax law regarding rental property so that the market value of low and moder- ate- income units reflects the reduced rents paid to qualify for subsidized financing. ♦ Amend the tax exempt bond allocation statute to maximize its availability for affordable rental housing. ♦ Provide exemptions from or reductions to the sales, use and transaction taxes applied to the devel- opment and production of affordable housing. ♦ Continue the policy of not reducing a person or household's Minnesota Family Investment Program monthly grant if they are residents of public or Section 8 housing. ♦ Authorize cities to amend their comprehensive plans, in order to facilitate increased lifecycle and affordable housing, with a simple majority vote of the city council, rather than a super majority. III -F Federal Role in Affordable Housing The AMM strongly believes that the financial support of the federal government is necessary in order to address the affordable housing challenges facing this, and other, metropolitan areas. Historically the federal government has been a major partner in the provision of affordable housing for low and moderate - income individuals and families. However, during the last twenty years, the federal 2003 Legislative Policies Housing and Economic Development government has significantly reduced its commitment and its financial support — reducing the amount of funds available for the production of affordable housing and eliminating key tax credit programs. A recent report by the Congressionally - commissioned Millennial Housing Commission reaffirms that there is a federal role in the provision of low and moderate - income housing, and calls for new or ex- panded programs in the areas of housing production, tax- exempt bonding, and federal tax credits, as well as increased flexibility for states spending federal block grant dollars. AMM believes the Commission's report should serve as a starting point for a federal housing policy that reinserts the federal government as an active partner with state and local governments and the private sector. AMM urges the Governor, the Legislature and local governments throughout the region to adopt memorializing resolutions and utilize other means, such as public forums and roundtable discussions, to inform federal officials and members of Minnesota's Congressional delegation of the urgent need for federal support. 111 -G Economic Development Responsibilities The state of Minnesota should continue to recognize cities as the primary unit of government responsible for implementing economic development policies and land use controls. However, the state should adopt policies that encourage cities to jointly plan for and implement economic development projects. New or amended economic development programs designed to address specific economic circum- stances within cities or counties should use problem definition as the criteria rather than geographic location, city size or similar criteria. III -H Tax Increment Financing Tax Increment Financing (TIF) has been and continues to be the primary tool available to local commu- nities for assisting economic development, redevelopment and housing projects. However, recent judicial decisions and property tax reforms have-raised several issues that could require legislative action. Among the issue are the changing nature of redevelopment, such as the emergence of mixed -use developments and the concept of economic obsolesce vs. blight; the challenge to the findings to estab- lish a district; potential shortfalls resulting from the tax reforms and the scheduling of activities within the TIF district. During the 2003 session, the legislature should: Amend the TIF statute to provide a time frame for bringing a cause of action regarding the findings to establish a district. The adoption of a time frame could also include provisions requiring in- creased public notice and public meetings to discuss the findings. 10 Association of Metropolitan Municipalities Housing and Economic Development Continue to monitor the impacts of tax reform on TIF districts and, if warranted, provide cities with additional authority to pay for possible TIF shortfalls. Such authority might include, but should not be limited to, an extension of district duration limits. • Define "mixed -use" developments and allowable uses of TIF in such developments. • Eliminate the five -year rule and provide for plan amendments to be approved by a certain date but allow implementation to occur after that date. III -1 State Role in Redevelopment/ Reinvestment The need to undertake redevelopment/reinvestment activities is a natural part of the development cycle experienced by all cities. Redevelopment allows local communities to adjust to changing market condi- tions, better utilize existing public infrastructure, and maintain a viable local tax base. However, due to the higher up -front costs of redevelopment, as compared to greenfield development, desirable redevel- opment projects often require public assistance. The State of Minnesota has a responsibility to work with local governments to provide a practical, flexible and multi- purpose mix of tools, resources and authorities that will allow local communities to address the challenges and take advantage of the opportunities of redevelopment. III-J Authority to Issue Capital Improvement Bonds Currently, Minnesota Statute 373.40 grants counties the authority to develop five -year capital improve- ment programs and to fund those improvements through the issuance of capital bonds. Eligible capital improvements include the construction and/or maintenance of roads and bridges and public facilities such as administrative buildings, public safety facilities, libraries and parks. Cities of all sizes and at a variety of development stages need to make similar capital improvements in order to maintain and improve the economic viability of their communities. Therefore, cities should have the same authority that counties currently possess to develop and fund capital improvement programs. III -K "This Old Shop" AMM supports the passage of a "This Old Shop" law, similar to the existing "This Old House" law (M. S. 273.11, Subd.16), which would allow owners of older commercial/industrial property to defer an increase in assessed value as the result of significant reinvestment in their property. 2003 Legislative Policies 11 Housing and Economic Development 12 Association of Metropolitan Municipalities Metropolitan Agencies (IV) IV -A Purpose of Metropolitan Governance The statutorily- defined Twin Cities metropolitan region is made up of 193 cities and townships covering over 3,000 square miles in seven counties. The effective and efficient delivery of certain public services and the continued economic growth of this region is enhanced by the existence of a regional entity to provide coordination and facilitate cooperation. Therefore, AMM supports the continued existence of a metropolitan governance system for the pur- pose of: ♦ Facilitating long -term region -wide planning with the cooperation and consideration of the affected local units of government; and ♦ Planning for and providing those public services that are needed by the region, but cannot be effectively and efficiently provided by local governments or the state. With or without the Metropolitan Council as it exists today, the region needs some entity to perform these functions. However, the Twin Cities' metropolitan governance structure should not be granted, nor should it assume, general local government or state agency powers. IV -B Roles & Responsibilities of the Metropolitan Council The primary responsibilities of the Metropolitan Council are to: ♦ Plan for the orderly and economical development of the metropolitan area by preparing a compre- hensive development guide that includes long -range comprehensive policy plans for the transporta- tion, aviation, wastewater treatment and recreational open space systems. ♦ Review local comprehensive plans for compatibility with the plans of neighboring communities, consistency with Metropolitan Council policies and conformity with metropolitan system plans. ♦ Provide specific regional services and administer select regional grant programs as assigned by state or federal law. ♦ Provide technical assistance, research and information to local units of government. 2003 Legislative Policies 13 Metropolitan Agencies Any additional responsibilities taken on by, or authority granted to, the Metropolitan Council should be the result of a specific statutory assignment or grant. IV -C Selection of Metropolitan Council Members Members of the Metropolitan Council should be selected via an open process that includes an opportu- nity for local governments and other stakeholders to provide meaningful input. Council members should be understanding of and responsive to the districts they represent while also serving the best interests of the region. Metropolitan Council members should serve fixed, staggered terms. IV -D Funding Regional Services The Metropolitan Council should continue to fund its regional services and activities through a combina- tion of user fees, property taxes, and state and federal grants. User fees should be set by the Metropolitan Council via an open and visible process that includes public notice and public hearings. User fees should be uniform by type of user and set at a level that will: 1) support effective and efficient public services, based on commonly accepted industry standards; and 2) allow for sufficient reserves to ensure service and fee stability over the long -term. Fee proceeds from one service should not be used to fund another regional service or program. IV -E Regional Systems There are currently four regional systems defined in statute — transportation, aviation, wastewater treatment and recreational open space. The purpose of these regional systems and the Metropolitan Council's authority for them is clearly outlined in state statute. In order to alter the focus or expand the reach of any of these systems, the Metropolitan Council must seek a statutory change. The system plans /statements prepared by the Metropolitan Council for these regional systems should be specific in terms of the size, location and timing of regional investments in order to allow for consider- ation in local comprehensive planning. System plans should clearly state the criteria by which local plans will be judged for consistency and the criteria that will be used to find that a local plan has a substantial impact on or contains a substantial departure from the metropolitan system plan. Additional regional systems should only be established if there is a compelling metropolitan problem or concern that can best be addressed through the designation. Common characteristics of the four existing regional systems include public ownership of the system and its components and an established regional or state funding source. These characteristics should be present in any new regional system that might be established. 14 Association of Metropolitan Municipalities Metropolitan Agencies IV -F Review of Local Comprehensive Plans In reviewing local comprehensive plans and plan amendments, the Metropolitan Council should: ♦ Recognize that its role is to review and comment, unless there is a substantial impact on or departure from one of the four system plans. ♦ Be aware of the statutory time constraints imposed by the legislature on plan amendments and development applications. ♦ Provide for immediate effectuation of plan amendments that have no potential for substantial impact on systems plans. ♦ Require the information needed for the Metropolitan Council to complete its review, but not pre- scribe additional content or format beyond that which is required by the Metropolitan Land Use Planning Act (LUPA). IV -G Local Zoning Authority Local governments are responsible for zoning. Local zoning decisions should not be conditioned upon the approval ofthe Metropolitan Council or any other governmental agency. AMM strongly opposes the creation of any appeals board with the authority to supersede city planning or zoning decisions. IV -H Implementation of Blueprint 2030 The latest metropolitan development guide — Blueprint 2030 — forecasts an additional 930,000 people and 460,000 households for the seven - county metropolitan area by the year 2030. In order to accommodate this growth in a manner that preserves the region's high quality of life: ♦ natural resource protection will have to be balanced with growth and development/reinvestment; ♦ significant new resources will have to be found for transportation and transit; and ♦ new households will have to be incorporated into the core cities, first and second -ring suburbs, and developing cities through both development and redevelopment. In order for regional and local planning to result in the successful implementation of Blueprint 2030 principles: 2003 Legislative Policies 15 Metropolitan Agencies ♦ the state of Minnesota must contribute additional financial resources — particularly in the areas of transportation and transit, reinvestment, affordable housing development, and the preservation of parks and open space; the Metropolitan Council must recognize the limitations of its authority and continue to work with cities in a collaborative, incentives -based manner; and ♦ metropolitan counties and school districts must be brought more thoroughly into the discussion. Overall, it is the Metropolitan Council's role, through Blueprint 2030 and its accompanying policy plans, to set broad regional goals and then provide cities with technical assistance and incentives to achieve those goals. Local governments are ultimately responsible for zoning, land use planning and development decisions within their borders. IV -1 Comprehensive Planning Schedule Cities are scheduled to complete new comprehensive plans in 2008. The adoption of a new metropoli- tan development guide (i.e. Blueprint 2030) in 2002 does not warrant a change in this schedule. Any future changes to the schedule for local comprehensive planning should be accompanied by the statutory establishment of a complementary schedule for regional planning. This schedule should: (1) protect cities from being forced into a state of perpetual planning in response to regional actions; and (2) ensure sufficient time for cities to understand and incorporate regional policies into their local planning efforts. IV -J Adjacent Counties As the Twin Cities region continues to grow and expand outward, it will become increasingly important for the traditional seven - county region to work collaboratively with the 12 adjacent counties in Minne- sota and Wisconsin, and the cities within those counties. There are environmental, transportation and land -use issues that cannot be solved by the seven - county area alone. Therefore, Minnesota Planning, the Metropolitan Council, and the counties adjacent to the Twin Cities metropolitan area should begin meeting on a regular basis regarding growth management strategies for the Minnesota counties. The Wisconsin counties should be included when appropriate. These strate- gies should focus on policies that can be implemented by local governments within the adjacent counties and by state agencies, rather than by extension of the Met Council's jurisdiction to additional counties. All strategies should complement and recognize growth management policies currently being imple- mented within the seven - county metropolitan area. 16 Association of Metropolitan Municipalities Metropolitan Agencies Regional services should be extended to communities in the adjacent counties only if there is a specific problem that can be best resolved by extending the service. The area receiving the services must pay for the service extension and agree to growth management strategies consistent with those of the seven - county metropolitan area. IV -K Natural Resource Protection The Association of Metropolitan Municipalities supports the Metropolitan Council's efforts to compile and maintain an inventory and assessment of regionally significant natural resources for the purpose ofprovid- ing local communities with additional information and technical assistance. However, any additional steps taken by the Metropolitan Council regarding the protection of natural resources must recognize that: The state has a significant role to play in the protection of natural resources — especially when those resources are significant to a multi- county area that is home to more than 50 percent of the state's population and a travel destination for many more. Given the limited availability of resources and the artificial nature of the metropolitan area's borders, neither the region nor individual metropolitan com- munities would be well served by assuming primary responsibility for financing and protecting these resources. The completion of local Natural Resource Inventories and Assessments (NRI/A) is not a regional system nor is it a required component of local comprehensive plans under the Metropolitan Land Use Planning Act The protection of natural resources will have to be balanced with the need to accommodate growth and development, reinvest in established communities, encourage more affordable housing and pro- vide transportation and transit connections. Decisions about the zoning or land -use designations of specific parcels of land not already contained within a public park, nature preserve or other protected area are, and should remain, the responsibility of local units of government. IV -L Water Management Any future changes to state statute and/or administrative rules pertaining to surface water and ground- water management should seek to clarify responsibilities and reduce duplication among the various levels of government involved. AMM opposes any changes that will result in additional unfunded mandates being placed on local units of government or in the reduction of cities' authority in the area of land -use planning. In order for cities to participate in their local Water Management Organizations (WMOs) to the best of their ability, individual city councils should have the authority to appoint a representative of their choice to their local WMO Board. Therefore, legislation enacted in 1999, limiting who may represent cities on WMO boards should be repealed. 2003 Legislative Policies 17 Metropolitan Agencies IV -M Funding Regional Parks & Open Space In the seven - county metropolitan area, regional parks essentially serve the role of state parks. There- fore, the state should continue to provide capital funding for the acquisition, development and improve- ment of these parks. State funding should equal 40 percent of the operating budget for regional parks. 18 Association of Metropolitan Municipalities Transportation (V) V -A Transportation Funding The AMM strongly supports increased funding for transit and highways, both of which are a critical need in the metropolitan area. In addition, funding for mass transit, including transit ways, light rail or heavy rail in existing corridors, should be dedicated in a manner consistent with current highway funding. Funds allocated to the metropolitan area should be flexible so that the most efficient and cost effective transportation solution may be chosen and the main metropolitan problem (congestion relief) can be addressed. The AMM supports a constitutional amendment dedicating the motor vehicle sales tax and/or other revenue source to a new Surface Transportation Multimodal Fund from which an appropriate amount is allocated to the Highway User Tax Distribution Fund to replace the auto license tab fee reduction of 2000, and the remaining amount to be used for transit and/or highway needs as priority dictates. The AMM supports a general gas tax increase, gas tax indexing, and adequate funding for transit. The AMM also supports a metropolitan area referendum for an additional half -cent or full -cent sales tax to support major highway and transit needs in the metropolitan area, with the caveat that current funding source amounts and percentages for the metropolitan area are maintained. All non - transportation programs should be funded from sources other than currently dedicated trans- portation funds. V -B Regional Transit System To provide travel choices to reduce congestion and automobile dependency the regional transit system should be a combination of integrated traffic management systems which include use of HOV lanes, express buses, exclusive transit ways, light rail transit; and commuter rail corridors built to connect residents to job, retail and commercial centers, plus a variety of other transit modes, including taxi, bus, pedestrian and bicycle. Shifting major transit funding from the property tax to a percentage of MVST may not provide enough revenue growth to serve the region's growing population. Therefore, the AMM supports annual funding increases for the metropolitan transit system that not only support the current system but also increase Metro Transit's ability to extend service to existing and growing communities and to provide much needed congestion relief. 2003 Legislative Policies 19 Transportation Park- and -ride facilities for mass transit modes adequate to connect regional centers, major trip genera- tors and communities, both urban and suburban, should have integrated feeder systems to accommo- date local buses, automobiles, van pools, and bicycles, as well as walking facilities. The AMM is opposed to legislative directives that constrain the ability of metropolitan transit providers to provide a full range of transit services, including reverse - commute routes, suburb -to- suburb routes, transit hub feeder services or new, experimental services that may show a low rate of operating cost recovery from the farebox. The Metropolitan Council should work with local units of government to encourage appropriate land use controls along designated transit corridors to promote transit ridership. V -C Road Access Fee In order to fairly provide for major street improvements of primary benefit to a particular subdivision development but not directly assessable and to allocate cost so that new growth pays its fair share, the legislature should authorize cities to establish, at their option, a road development access charge to be collected at the time that subdivisions are approved and/or at the time building permits are issued similar to park dedication fees. V -D Transportation Utility The AMM supports legislation to authorize cities to establish a transportation utility for street construc- tion and reconstruction of aging infrastructure, similar to the existing storm water utility, so that costs of improved facilities can be more fairly charged to the users rather than the general population as a whole. V -E Highway Turnbacks & Funding The AMM supports jurisdictional reassignment or tumback of roads on a phased basis using functional classification and other appropriate criteria subject to a corresponding mechanism for adequate funding of roadway improvements and continuing maintenance. Cities do not have the financial capacity, other than significant property tax increases, to absorb the additional roadway responsibilities without new funding sources. The existing municipal tumback fund is not adequate based on contemplated tumbacks. V -F `3C' Transportation Planning Process: Elected Officials Role The AMM supports continuation of the Transportation Advisory Board (TAB), a majority of local elected officials membership on the TAB itself and the TAB process, which was developed to meet federal requirements for designation of the Metropolitan Council as the Metropolitan Planning Organiza- 20 Association of Metropolitan Municipalities Transportation tion that is responsible for the continuous, comprehensive and cooperative (3C) transportation planning process to allocate federal funds among metropolitan area projects. This process requirement was reinforced by the 1991 Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) and the 1998 Transportation Efficiency Act for the 21 st Century (TEA21). V -G Motion Imaging Recording System (M.I.R.S.): Traffic Law Compliance The AMM requests legislative action authorizing utilization of motion imaging recording system technol- ogy for governmental units, including cities, on streets and highways to assist in the promotion of safety and traffic law enforcement. The technology has been proven and is currently used for law enforcement by numerous states, municipalities and other countries. At a minimum, the state should authorize a pilot project or projects on municipal streets in the metropolitan area. V -H Airport Noise Mitigation AMM supports noise abatement programs and expenditures designed to minimize the impacts of MAC- operated facilities on neighboring communities. The Metropolitan Airports Commission should determine the design and geographic reach of these programs only after a thorough public input process that considers the priorities and concerns of the impacted cities and their residents. The MAC and state should seek long -term solutions to fund the full mitigation package as adopted in 1996 for all homes in the 64 -60 DNL impact area. Noise abatement efforts should be paid for by fees and charges collected from airport users, as well as state and federal fiinds. V -1 Cities Under 5,000 Population Currently cities under 5,000 population receive no state funding or MSA funds for collector or arterial streets regardless of traffic volume, origination and/or destination. Current CSAH distribution to metro- politan counties is inadequate to provide for the needs of smaller cities in the metropolitan area. Criteria such as the number of average daily trips should be established in a small city local road improvement program for funding qualification and a distribution method devised. Possible fiuiding sources include the five- percent set -aside account in the Highway User Distribution Fund, modification to county municipal accounts and/or state general fund. V-J County State Aid Highway (CSAH) Distribution Formula The AMM supports modification of the County State Aid Highway (CSAH) distribution formula to more fairly account for total vehicle miles traveled on metropolitan county CSAH funded roads. Al- though only 10% of the CSAH roads are in the metro area they account for nearly 50% of the vehicle miles traveled. The metro counties receive less than 20% ofthe CSAH distribution and have instituted city cost participation, whereby cities are now forced to pay up to 45% of a CSAH road project cost in some areas. 2003 Legislative Policies 21 Transportation V -K Municipal Input (Consent) for Trunk Highways The previous municipal consent statute for trunk highways was unclear, allowed multiple sign- offtimes including just prior to bid letting and allowed project delay. MnDOT never invoked an appeal. The current statute, as totally re -written in 2001, provides for MnDOT to submit detailed plans with city cost estimates at a point one and a half to two years prior to bid letting, at which time public hearings are held for citizen /business /municipal input. If MnDOT does not concur with requested changes, MnDOT may appeal. Currently, that process would take a maximum of three and a half months and the results of the appeal board are binding on both the city and MnDOT. The AMM opposes any change to the current statute that would allow MnDOT to totally disregard the appeal board ruling for state trunk highways. The result of such a change would significantly minimize MnDOT's desire or need to negotiate in good faith with the city for appropriate project access and alignment. Plus it would make the public hearing and appeal process meaningless. V -L Municipal State Aid Rules for Urban Road Systems Current rules and standards governing MSA expenditures impact the efficient use ofthese funds be- cause they do not take into account urban road constraints. These rules need to be changed to ac- knowledge the technical and practical restrictions on construction and reconstruction of urban road systems. New municipal state aid design standards should not apply to reconstruction of existing state aid streets originally constructed under different standards. Future changes to state aid rules should ensure the involvement of elected officials and engineering professionals in the decision - making process. 22 Association of Metropolitan Municipalities Committee Rosters (VI) Housing and Economic Development Policy Committee Tom Goodwin, Councilmember, Apple Valley (Committee Chair) Janis Callison, Councilmember, Minnetonka Sharon Cassen, Councilmember, New Hope Nancy Haas, IGR Director, St. Paul Regina Harris, HRA Director, Bloomington Andrea Hart Kajer, IGR Director, Minneapolis Anne Norris, Manager, Crystal Yale Norwick, Mayor, Mahtomedi Ron Rankin, Commun. Dev. Dir., Minnetonka Steve Stahmer, Asst. to the City Manager, Hopkins Bob Streetar, Commun. Dev. Dir., Columbia Heights James Verbrugge, AssistantAdministrator, Eagan Metropolitan Agencies Policy Committee Beverly Aplikowski, Councilmember, Arden Hills (Committee Chair) Bill Barnhart, Government Relations Representative, Minneapolis Frank Boyles, City Manager, Prior Lake Cathy Busho, Mayor, Rosemount Mary Hamman- Roland, Mayor, Apple Valley Anne Hurlburt, Director of Community Development, Plymouth Andrea Jenkins, Councilmember Assistant, Minneapolis Tom Link, Director of Community Development, Inver Grove Heights Terry Schneider, Councilmember, Minnetonka Blair Tremere, Councilmember, Golden Valley 2003 Legislative Policies 23 Committee Rosters Municipal Revenue Policy Committee Jim Smith, Councilmember, Independence (Committee Chair) Greg Andrews, Director of Finance, Brooklyn Park Bill Barnhart, Government Relations Rep., Minneapolis Tom Burt, Administrator, Rosemount Steve Devich, Assistant City Manager, Richfield Walt Fehst, Manager, Columbia Heights Matt Fulton, Manager, New Brighton Pat Hams, Councilmember, St. Paul Joe Huss, Finance Manager, Bloomington Barbara Johnson, Councilmember, Minneapolis Kim Kamper, Interim City Administrator, Oak Park Heights Jim Keinath, Administrator, Circle Pines Jim Knutson, Finance Director, Anoka Tom Lawell, Administrator, Apple Valley Joe Lynch, Administrator, Arden Hills William Mars, Mayor, Shakopee Steve O'Malley, Deputy City Manager, Burnsville Don Rambow, Finance Director, White Bear Lake Douglas Reeder, Administrator, South St. Paul Ryan Schroeder, Administrator, Cottage Grove Jerry Splinter, Manager, Coon Rapids Steve Stahmer, Assistant to the City Manager, Hopkins Jim Willis, Administrator, Inver Grove Heights Transportaton and General Government Policy Committee Steve Larson, Mayor, New Brighton (Committee Chair) Glen Burke, Airport Manager, South St. Paul Dave Callister, Clerk- Administrator, Osseo Charlie Crichton, Councilmember, Burnsville Chuck DeVore, Councilmember, White Bear Lake Dan Donahue, Manager, New Hope Steve Elkins, Councilmember, Bloomington Sharon Feess, Councilmember, Brooklyn Park 24 Association of Metropolitan Municipalities Committee Rosters Marcia Glick, Manager, Robbinsdale Bill Hargis, Mayor, Woodbury Jon Haukaas, Director of Public Works, Fridley Jon Hohenstein, Administrator, Mahtomedi Patrick Hollister, Administrative Assistant, Mendota Heights Mary Johnson, Mayor, Independence Mike Klassen, St. Paul Mary McComber, Councilmember, OakParkHeights Mark McNeill, Administrator, Shakopee Pete Meintsma, Mayor, Crystal Joan Molenaar, Councilmember, Champlin Veid Muiznieks, Councilmember, St. Paul Park Bruce Nawrocki, Councilmember, Champlin Ed Nelson, Councilmember, Brooklyn Center Dan Niziolek, Councilmember, Minneapolis Ellsworth Stein, Airport Relations Commission, Mendota Heights Gertrude Ulrich, Councilmember, Richfield Karen Lowery Wagner, Government Relations Representative John Weaver, Councilmember, Anoka 2003 Legislative Policies 25 Ann ua Blue Ribbon School Gatewood Elementary School in Minnetonka was named a national Blue Ribbon School of Excellence. Gatewood was one of only three elementary schools in the state and one of 264 schools in the country to receive this prestigious national recognition in 2001 -02. The rigorous Blue Ribbon Award assessment includes a comprehensive self - evaluation and written report, interviews, and site visit. Gatewood is the first elementary school in the Hopkins School District to receive this honor. All three of the District's secondary schools have been named Blue Ribbon Schools. In 1982 -83, Hopkins High School was the first high school in Minnesota to receive this honor. The next year, 1983 -84, Hopkins North Junior High and Hopkins West Junior High received the honor —the first junior highs in the Twin Cities. Hopkins was the first school district in the country to have all three of its secondary schools named National Schools of Excellence. 20th Anniversary The Harley Hopkins Family Center celebrated its 20th anniversary last October. Harley is designed for families and children up to age six, and incorporates all of Hopkins School District 270's early childhood and family education programs, including Kaleidoscope Preschool, Early Childhood Family Education, Early Childhood Special Education, and Family Literacy. Harley Hopkins got its start in 1981 when an elementary school by the same name was closed due to declining enrollment. That elementary school was converted into the Harley Hopkins Family Center. In 1991, the former school was torn down and a new early childhood family education facility was constructed. The Harley Hopkins Family Center was the first facility of its kind in the state built specifically for early childhood and family education programs. Translations With a grant from the Hopkins Family Services Collaborative, the Hopkins School District translated school forms and documents into Spanish and Somali —the two primary non — English languages in the School District. The forms are available on District 270's web site at: www.hopkins.kl2.mn.us under the about District 270 drop -down menu. E— Newsletter Hopkins School District has started a weekly electronic newsletter called Hopkins E —News. Subscribers receive brief and timely districtwide news and alerts about information available on the Hopkins School District's web site at www.hopkins.k12.mn.us. To sign up to receive Hopkins E —News, send your name and e—mail address to: eileen_harvala @hopkins.kl 2.mn.us. Passion for Learning . . Learning for Life From the opening of a new community center to the creation of its own online charter school, 2001 -02 was quite a school year in the life of the Hopkins School District. It was a year of tremendous change, a year of many successes, and a year of challenges and loss. In addition to the state - mandated information, this report contains a snapshot of last year. It is impossible to include all of the wonderful news about the accomplishments of our incredible students and staff, or to recap all of the events that occurred in our school district community over the course of last year. However, we do pause for a moment and reflect .... Turn to pages 7 & 8 for more Passion for Learning highlights Ll L3 L3 Residents Support Referenda Hopkins School District 270 residents demonstrated their support for their communities' schools by approving three separate levy questions during two elections last November and December. In November, residents approved an excess operating levy increase of $225 per student amounting to $2.1 million per year, and a $20 million ($2 million per year for 10 years) down - payment levy for curriculum and technology. In December, residents approved a $59.768 million capital -bond levy for building remodeling, renovations, and additions. Passage of these levies is enabling District 270 to maintain its fiscal integrity, target money specifically at curriculum and technology, and enhance the physical aspects of its buildings and facilities so it can provide the best learning environment possible. New Community Center The Ronald B. Davis Community Center opened in November 2001. The new community center is an addition to the existing Meadowbrook Elementary ;School, and is a joint Hopkins School District 270 and ;city of Golden Valley project. The 24,000 - square -foot facility provides expanded space for Hopkins School District 270's early childhood Family education, Kids & Company child -care program, end parent/adult education programs as well as the city of Golden Valley's Park & Recreation Department - sponsored programs. During daytime hours, the spaces are managed and utilized by School District programs. During evening and weekend hours, the facility is used for city programs. All residents of Golden Valley are able to attend city programs at the community center. The community center features a 10,000 - square -foot I ymnasium containing the equivalent of two full -sized basketball /volleyball courts. The gymnasium can be ,divided with drop nets into youth -size gym spaces. The added gym space is a response to a previously identified 'shortage in the city. The community center includes two preschool rooms, a sibling -care room, a large- muscle room for elementary and early childhood family education programs and activities, three adult/parent education spaces, and a resource center /office space. Some of these spaces are lased by Kids & Company, District 270's before - school, After- school and summer child -care program. The community center is named after Ronald B. Davis, a longtime Golden Valley resident, and School District J J U and community volunteer, who died on July 30, 2001. He was actively involved in many civic, community, and professional organizations. In 1991, Davis was elected to the Hopkins Board of Education, serving as School Board chair from 1993 until January 2001. Under Davis' leadership, the Hopkins School District developed collaborative, community partnerships that resulted in the construction of the Lindbergh Center in Minnetonka, the Hopkins Center for the Arts in Hopkins, and the new community center in Golden Valley. Reduce the Use Since 1999, the use of tobacco by Hopkins School District 270 youth has declined; so have alcohol use rates. Marijuana use rates, which were frightening in 1999, have declined or at least have not increased, according to current data. Sharon MacDonald, Reduce the Use coordinator, delivered this message of hope at a town meeting that was conducted in February 2002. The data provided by the Minnesota Student Survey about risk taking among Hopkins School District 270 youth, supports the hard work of the entire greater - Hopkins community, and has paid off in reducing the use of alcohol, tobacco, and marijuana by District 270 youth. Proof of the community's commitment to the goals of Reduce the Use was evident in the Awards of Excellence presented at the town meeting. Award recipients included the Glen Lake Optimist Club; Hopkins Area Jaycees; Hopkins Athlete Leadership Training (HALT) Senior Leaders; Minnetonka Police Department, including Sergeant Steve Kniss and Officer Scott Boerboom; Positive Alternative Choices for Teens (PACT); Hopkins West Junior High's Parent Talk Basket Project; Ridgedale YMCA; Roxy Ewald from Driskill's Foods; and Hopkins School District 270 staff members, Jennifer Weyenberg and Andrew Rummel. Empty Bowls The fourth annual Empty Bowls was a tremendous success, raising more than $38,600 for the Intercongregation Communities Association (ICA) food shelf and the Hopkins Area Family Resource Center. The event included: • 26 sponsors of materials and in -kind services • 46 soup kettle sponsors • 1,700 handmade ceramic soup bowls created by students and community potters • 49 Hopkins School District art teachers • 194 volunteers & 343 entertainers of all ages • 1,500 servings of donated soup and bread You Can Review Curriculum Evaluation What We Teach As a District 270 resident, you can review what we teach. Academic and Evaluation of Hopkins School District 270's curriculum is an ongoing process. All major subjects —Art, Business self - development standards have been Education, Challenge, English as a Second Language, Family and Consumer Sciences, Health, Language Arts, Math, established for each subject. These Music, Physical Education, Science, Social Studies, Technology Educations Reading, and World Languages —are standards are available from the District's Teaching & Learning Office at included in a review and improvement cycle that takes more than three years to complete. 952 - 988 -4036. The extensive curriculum review process includes: • conducting surveys of students and parents /guardians on program and instructional effectiveness The District has a procedure for • exploring programs in other school districts parents, guardians, and adult students . steering the process through the District's volunteer curriculum review group -the Educational Services Advisory to review instructional materials, and to Committee (ESAC) make reasonable arrangements with staff members for alternative instruction. obtaining input from the Hopkins Board of Education (School Board) throughout the review process Contact your teacher or school principal providing opportunities for community input to explore this option. incorporating national, state, and District standards and test data • recommending budget enhancements to support the curriculum modifications National Merit Six Hopkins High School seniors were among the more than 300 Minnesota high school seniors who were named semifinalists in the 2002 National Merit Scholarship competition. These students represent the top one –half of one percent of high school seniors in the country. District 270's semifinalists were Meredith Cain – Nielsen, Peter Forsberg, Ann Klaas, Nathaniel Law, Elizabeth Newberg, and Freya Zaheer. The students earned this honor by being among the highest scorers in the nation on the Preliminary Scholastic Aptitude Test (PSAT) that they took as juniors. All continued in competition for approximately 8,000 college scholarships totaling more than $28 million. Annually, Hopkins High School is a regional leader in the number of students who earn National Merit scholarships. Twelve Hopkins High School seniors were named Commended Scholars in the 2002 National Merit Scholarship competition. Commended Scholars received letters of commendation for their outstanding performance on the PSAT that they took as juniors. Hopkins' Commended Scholars were Michael Adams, Jeremy Coudray, Keely Dulmage, Brenna Fawcett, Fan Jiang, Amanda Johnson, Sarah Lonning, Timothy Ober, Thomas Preston, Nathan Pysno, Rose Ryan, and Laura Stroessner. Talent Search Hopkins West Junior High students, Mahati Chintapalli and Danielle Selcer, finished in the top one percent in the Midwest Talent Search by earning high scores on the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) or the American College Test (ACT). Both are tests usually taken by high – school students. The Midwest Talent Search is conducted annually by Northwestern University's Center for Talent Development in Evanston, Illinois. Last year, more than 25,000 7th and 8th grade students participated in the search, among them about 50 7th and 8th grade students from HWJH. HWJH students qualified for the talent search by attaining outstanding academic achievement in the mathematics and /or verbal areas of the District's standardized tests. The comprehensive reviews for these departments, which were conducted with the help of ESAC, provided opportunities to affirm the strengths of the programs and to identify areas for improvements. It may take seven years to fully implement any of the recommended changes to the District's curriculum, programs, and services. Inherent in all of the reviews is aligning the District's curriculum and assessment tools with national, state, and District standards. During the 2001 -02 school year the District's Family and Consumer Sciences, Health, and Science departments each completed a major component of the review and improvement process. The Social Studies and Art departments began the review process in the 2001 -02, school year by seeking input from ESAC and the School Board. Math and Physical Education will begin this process in 2002 -03. Other subjects and the year in which each begins the 3.5- to 4 -year comprehensive curriculum review process include: Technology Education, and World Languages — 2003 -04; Challenge, Music, and English as a Second Language - 2004 -05; Reading- 2005 -06; and Language Arts, and Business Education - 2006 -07. 13 Ll [a L1 L3 Ll Family and Consumer Sciences The focuses of the Family and Consumer Sciences (FACS) educational program are the individual, the family, and the community. Research indicates that family experiences determine who a person is and what a person becomes. FACS, working with District 270 families, supports the development of the knowledge and skills that students need as family members, now and in the future. Family and Consumer Sciences courses focus on family life, consumer and money management skills, and advanced study in child - development careers. High - school electives include classes in careers, child psychology, marriage and family living, housing and interior design, teen issues, consumerism, and foods. Student internship opportunities are available. Improvement Opportunities Out of the review process, a number of opportunities for improvement were identified, including: • refining and aligning FACS 7 to include foods, child development, process learning, and sewing • refining and aligning FACS 8 to include consumer and global perspectives on food and nutrition, consumerism, sewing, career exploration, and process learning • updating the coherence and sequencing of content in the food preparation, nutrition, and culinary arts careers program areas • reinstating learning opportunities in child development and child psychology through an on -site preschool program Recommendations FACS performance and assessment standards recommendations include: • in FACS 7, adopting the American Red Cross baby- sitting certification or equivalent as the standard in the child -care unit • in FACS 8, developing a project using all of the content and skills learned in the course, which can be carried out and assessed in an applied family or community setting in FACS 9, establishing common performance standards with the high school teachers so that expectations are clear to students and teachers in FACS 10th -12th grade electives, identifying occupational standards for each advanced -level course, and a new occupation - related course FACS instructional recommendations include: • meeting with other FACS teachers to discuss the current inventory of instructional methods used in the District's classrooms • acquiring and using various technological teaching aids • introducing new content into the FACS program that fits the changing needs of consumers and families • continuing to ask graduates for their ideas on FACS - related topics, career interests, and skill needs, which will better prepare them with life skills for the future • offering FACS topics and courses in varied formats FACS staff development recommendations for teachers include: • completing the American Red Cross training • completing training for assessing student work as a strategy to improve student learning • staying current with information related to health and safety rules • participating in the early childhood task force to stay current with issues and trends • attending professional development sessions on sports and nutrition to learn about the newest theories and theory applications Health Education The mission of the Health Education Department is to provide an environment where students can become health literate at every grade level. Curriculum The Great Body Shop is the backbone of the elementary health education program. It provides performance objectives in the areas of knowledge, values, life skills, and critical thinking. It is an integrated curriculum that can oe taught in tandem with other content areas. It provides a parent/family component that keeps parents /guardians aware of what the students are studying. The junior –high health curriculum is taught in five different courses at three grade levels. • 7th –grade Science addresses tobacco prevention and functions of the body • 7th –grade FACS addresses nutrition and diet • 8th –grade Science addresses first aid • 8th –grade Healthwise addresses drug and sexuality education • 9th –grade Health Decisions addresses violence prevention, mental health, and other teen issues Students fulfill the state's middle –level health standard when they complete these five courses. The high – school health curriculum includes facets from the national and state health standards in a one – term course called Health Science. At the completion of this course, students fulfill the Minnesota health graduation standard. Three electives enhance the breadth and depth of specific health areas, including Psychology of Esteem, Nutrition In– Depth, and Exploration of the Medical and Health Fields. Recommendations Elementary recommendations include: • communicating with parents /guardians about materials to be reviewed by them with their children • developing a meaningful amount of classroom time where health content is delivered in all schools • finishing the piloting of new assessments for the Great Body Shop curriculum • providing teachers with the opportunity to display their best practices in delivering the Great Body Shop curriculum • highlighting opportunities for teachers to understand differentiated instruction and the Great Body Shop curriculum Junior high recommendations include: • facilitating meetings for teachers to adjust the scope and sequence of the health curriculum so all areas of content are delivered in an appropriate fashion • increasing the 8th –grade Healthwise course to nine weeks • developing leadership funding for the coordination of five courses at three grade levels, which deliver the middle –level health standard • delivering assessment tools in all the courses that contribute to the completion of the middle –level health standard • changing Healthwise to a graded course • sending information and updated course syllabi to all parents /guardians Senior high recommendations include: • meeting with and collecting data annually from junior high instructors to ensure the quality continuation of service • recommending that Health Science be scheduled immediately following the completion of 10th –grade physical fitness • re– prioritizing portions of the curriculum content to create a more advanced scope and sequence • developing a committee to evaluate the school's environment and its role in supporting the A Message from curriculum while modeling positive healthful the ESAC Chair . behaviors • pursuing additional creative instructional ideas for addressing the needs of diverse learners • investigating the placement of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training with other courses that address fitness and the cardiovascular understanding of exercise • designing an experiential, interdisciplinary course Science The science program allows each student to understand and apply scientific concepts and experiences. The elementary program includes hands –on science units and inquiry activities. It emphasizes process skills such as observation, classification, measurement, prediction, and experimentation in activities from the life, earth, physical, and environmental sciences. Science is required at the junior –high level and consists of lab and projects in life science (7th grade); earth science (8th grade); and physical science (9th grade). Two credits of science are required at Hopkins High School. Course offerings include three levels of biology; two levels of chemistry; two levels of physics; physiology and anatomy; environmental science; science topics; Freshwater Ecology program; Advanced Placement; and online classes in astronomy, chemistry, physiology and anatomy, and biology. Recommendations Elementary content recommendations include: • selecting new science curricular materials and additional nonfiction and technical– science reading materials • investigating environmental curriculum and resources • communicating the inquiry nature of the science curriculum to parents /guardians • reviewing and updating academic skill expectations and content standards Secondary content recommendations include: • examining the content of science courses to ensure that there is developmentally appropriate curriculum for diverse learners • choosing new textbooks, lab equipment, and other materials • supporting the science curriculum programs at the District's tuition programs Assessment recommendations include: • conducting grade level meetings to review and develop multiple forms of assessment • monitoring and evaluating all state science preparatory and graduation performance assessments • evaluating instructional practices and assessment 'instruments for gender bias • continuing discussions concerning the addition of a state graduation standard in 9th grade Instructional and staff development recommendations include: • supporting programs that promote and provide instructional strategies addressing cultural, ethnic, gender, and inclusion issues • conducting workshops focused on best practices in science instruction • creating a process for piloting and adopting curricular materials • providing staff training and mentoring opportunities • developing communication tools • investigating ways to expand the environmental strand and reinstate portions of the naturalist program By Jennifer Koegler ESAC Chair The Educational Services Advisory Committee (ESAC) assists District 270 with its curriculum reviews, affirming the strengths of the programs, identifying areas for program improvements, and focusing on the end results of these efforts. ESAC also prioritizes any funding requests coming out of the reviews, which must be carried forward to the District's Program –Based Budgeting process. This year, in addition to reviewing the Family and Consumer Sciences, Health, and Science curricula as part of their regular review cycles (see pages 2 & 3), ESAC addressed standardized testing, followed the successful progress of the Hopkins Online Academy becoming an approved charter school, endorsed the District's differentiated instruction approach, and heard updates on curricular areas' progress from previous years' reviews. It has been my pleasure to chair ESAC this year with the wonderful group of individuals who devote their time and talents to our collective goals. This year as well, we've enjoyed the support of the District's constituents who went to the polls two times and voted to support District efforts via three successful referendums. The funding of the District's physical infrastructure supports the outstanding curricular programs we have in place. Your support has surrounded our educational programs with the environment they need to succeed. ESAC membership is comprised of District volunteers— residents and staff members —who provide advice, direction and support to the District regarding the design, implementation and evaluation of curriculum, instruction and assessment. The committee's efforts are performed in concert with the District's mission and Strategic Plan. I invite you to join us at our monthly ESAC meetings in the Board Room at the Eisenhower Community Center, 1001 Highway 7, Hopkins. Consider adding your perspective to our group as a member or simply attend a meeting to see what we're about. We welcome you as we look forward to another invigorating year of curriculum evaluation on behalf of our students. ESAC Membership Educational Services Advisory Committee (ESAC) 2001 -02 community representatives included Chair Jennifer Koegler, Vice Chair Luanna Hacker, Scott Charlesworth- Seiler, Ward Eames, Jim Folk, Barbara Klaas, Sue Knopp, Jan Lapp, Bob Mattison, Pam Merkle, Beth Olson, Nancy Renneke, Debbie Rosenthal, Karen Schwartz, and Michael Trangle. District 270 staff members who served on ESAC for 2001 -02 included Bob Muller, director of teaching & learning; Jan Ormasa, director of special services; Rosemary Lawrence and Pat Schmidt, principals; and Jerry Christenson, associate principal. Community positions are available for the 2002 -03 school year. ESAC members serve two –year terms, and new members are appointed in October. If interested or for further information, please call 952 - 988 -4036. District Standards Specify Graduation, Credit Requirements All District 270 students in 9th -12th grade must register for and complete 14 credits each year. A total of 56 credits, earned in 9th -12th grade, are required for graduation, effective with the graduating class of 2002. The District's Strategic Plan calls for each student to achieve relevant and challenging personal learner goals. Effective for the graduating class of 2002, each student graduating from Hopkins High School must successfully complete a Personal Learner Goal Plan, incorporating the state's graduation standards and the District's required courses and credits. Each Personal Learner Goal Plan will contain an individualized transition plan, which will be designed to help the student successfully take the next step following graduation. Graduation Standards Implementation Manual Available District 270's Graduation Standards Implementation Manual is available through the Teaching & Learning Office at 952 - 988 -4036. Policies and procedures covered in the manual include participation; inclusion of preparatory standards and high standards; assessment of standards achievement; staff development; credit for learning, including waivers; considerations for students with disabilities and students with limited English proficiency; student and parent/ guardian advising; record keeping and reporting; and appeal process. Standardized Tests Have Many Uses Hopkins School District 270 gives Districtwide standardized tests for a variety of reasons, including: • reporting student progress and achievement to students, parents/ guardians, the state, and post– secondary institutions • allocating resources to evaluate curriculum and instruction • identifying strengths and weaknesses in curriculum and instruction areas • comparing Hopkins students with national, state, and other norms • counseling students, and identifying students who may need some extra help or who may benefit from special programs Information on student academic progress and achievement helps students, working with their parents/ guardians and teachers, to set Personal Learner Goals, which are personally challenging, relevant, and dynamic. Mandated Report Hopkins School District 270's 2002 annual report on curriculum, instruction, and student performance is designed to meet the requirements of the 1996 Education Excellence legislation. This state mandate dictates the content of this report and requires its distribution to all Hopkins School District 270 residents. Standards &Testing Hopkins School District 270 has long recognized that clearly defined education standards set the course for quality and accountability. Hopkins is implementing the state's standards –based graduation rule, which governs the minimum requirements that public schools must establish for students to earn a high – school diploma. It calls for schools to hold students accountable for achieving high standards on classroom assignments and other activities as well as traditional tests. The graduation standards have two components —Basic Standards and High Standards (Profile of Learning). To earn a diploma from a Minnesota public high school, students need to pass Basic Standards Tests in reading, mathematics, and written composition at state –established minimum levels, and complete the number of Profile of Learning standards determined by District staff and School Board vote. In Hopkins, students who are in 9th, 10th, 11th, and 12th grades must complete 17 of 48 standards. The Basic Standards Tests measure student achievement in the areas of mathematics and reading in 8th grade, and written composition in 10th grade. These tests are designed to ensure that no student leaves school without basic life and work survival skills. The High Standards (Profile of Learning) define what high school graduates should know and be able to do in order to succeed in today's complex and rapidly changing world. The purpose of the High Standards is to set standards that go beyond basic –skill development toward a higher level of achievement. The comprehensive goals for this component of the graduation rule include helping learners become purposeful thinkers, effective communicators, self– directed learners, productive group participants, and responsible citizens. Nine major areas of learning make up the High Standards, including read, listen, & view; write & speak; literature & the arts; mathematical concepts & applications; inquiry & research; scientific concepts & applications; social studies; physical education & lifetime fitness; and economics & business. The required state graduation standards have been integrated into District 270's existing curriculum standards and courses. The 2001 -02 school year marked the seventh academic year in which District 270's students have been measured against the state's Basic Standards Tests in reading and mathematics. The tests are given to students for the first time in 8th grade. According to state guidelines, a passing score is a scale score of 600 or higher on each test, which students much achieve in order to earn a high school diploma. District 270's results over the seven years of administering the state – developed tests show that 94 percent of its 10th graders have reached the basic level required for graduation in reading, and 89 percent have achieved that basic level in mathematics. For the fourth year, the state's 10th –grade students were required to take a written composition test. Using a 4.0 scale, students needed to score 3.0 or higher to pass. Results show that 93 percent of Hopkins' 10th graders have reached that level. Students who have not met the state requirements are able to retake the tests each succeeding year. To help these students, the District offers Basic Standards Summer Camps, focusing on the knowledge and skills necessary to pass the tests, and on test – taking strategies; a Saturday morning test preparation and review program, which is targeted at 8th and 9th grade students; and high school courses focusing on math, reading, and writing skills needed to pass the tests, which are required for 12th graders who have not passed the tests. U U U U U U 2001 -02 Iowa Achievement Tests Percent of students scoring at or above the national norm group median 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Complete Battery Total Reading Language Total Math Social Studies Science m 4 Grade 81.50% 80.80% 74.70% 76.70% 80.50% 81.10% O 6 Grade 76.60% 75.50% 71.00% 68.20% 73.40% 77.00% ■ 9 Grade 82.20% 74.10% 69.60% 71.00% 80.60% 84.60% 04 Grade 136 Grade 09 Grade Minnesota Basic Standards Tests Grade End of Year Students Passing Students Passing Students Exempt Level Enrollment at State Level at Modified Level in m /r /w* Math(m) Reading(r) Writing(w) IEP /504 in m /r /w* *math /reading /writing *math /reading /writing 8th 620 478 524 6m /6r 9th 661 584 610 9m /9r 10th 708 601 637 628 3m /2r 5m /4r /5w 11th 644 594 610 608 8m /4r /1 w 2m /2r /3w 12th 637 616 626 620 2002 Hopkins 8th graders at or above a scale score of 600 Reading Math Hopkins 87% 79% State 80% 74% IEP = Individual Education Plan for special education students 504 = students with predetermined conditions not on IEPs 11 m /5r /5w 3m /3r /5w 2002 Hopkins 10th graders earning a 3.0 score or higher Written Composition Hopkins 93.2% (average score of 3.2) State 90.7% (average score of 3.2) American College Tests (ACT), Scholastic Aptitude, Tests (SAT) and Preliminary Scholastic Aptitude Tests (PSAT) Student - purchased national measure of college aptitude Inform and facilitate applications for post high school education Help the District evaluate its education programs Most students take these tests in 11th grade Call the High School Guidance Office for information Students Perform Well on College Entrance Tests Most Hopkins High School students elect to take one or both of the two' main college entrance tests —the American College Test (ACT) and the,. Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT). On the SAT, Hopkins students perform at or above the national and state mean. Last year, 292 Hopkins students took the SAT, earning a mean score of 574 on the verbal portion of the test, and a mean score of 590 on the math portion. This compares to a' national mean of 504 and a state mean of 581 on the verbal; and a national mean of 516 and a" state mean of 591 on the math. The maximum score on each portion of the test —math and verbal —is 800. District 270"fs Assessment Plan Test Description Main Uses Grades Minnesota State- mandated measures District and school Reading and math in 3rd Comprehensive of student progress in accountability to grade; reading', math, and Assessments (MCA) reading, math, and written the state written composition in Minnesota 22.1 composition National 21 5th grade; written 2001 -02 Hopkins 23.5 composition and reading Minnesota 22.1 National 20.8 in 10th grade; and math 23 in 11th grade Minnesota State - mandated measures Certify students Reading and math starts Basic of whether students meet for graduation in 8th grade, and written Standards Minnesota's standards in composition starts in Tests (BST) reading, math, and written District and school 1 Oth grade (testing surpass national and state composition accountability to continues in 9th -12th the state for math grades until students and reading in 8th pass the tests) grade, and written composition in 10th grade Iowa Tests District - purchased Show students, 4th, 6th, and 9th grade of Basic Skills national measures of parents /guardians, student achievement schools, and the in several areas District how our students' achievement compares to national achievement Identify students eligible for Assurance of Mastery CogAT District - purchased Compare levels of 4th, 6th, and 9th grade Cognitive national measure of achievement to Ability Tests student academic levels of academic ability ability Northwest District- purchased Monitor student 4th, 5th, and 6th grade Achievement access to pool of progress toward Level Tests. nationally scaled items achieving District - for constructing -tests - - -- standards in. math - - -- designed to measure .student growth from Indicator of program year to year effectiveness American College Tests (ACT), Scholastic Aptitude, Tests (SAT) and Preliminary Scholastic Aptitude Tests (PSAT) Student - purchased national measure of college aptitude Inform and facilitate applications for post high school education Help the District evaluate its education programs Most students take these tests in 11th grade Call the High School Guidance Office for information Students Perform Well on College Entrance Tests Most Hopkins High School students elect to take one or both of the two' main college entrance tests —the American College Test (ACT) and the,. Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT). On the SAT, Hopkins students perform at or above the national and state mean. Last year, 292 Hopkins students took the SAT, earning a mean score of 574 on the verbal portion of the test, and a mean score of 590 on the math portion. This compares to a' national mean of 504 and a state mean of 581 on the verbal; and a national mean of 516 and a" state mean of 591 on the math. The maximum score on each portion of the test —math and verbal —is 800. Sixty Nine Students Earn Advanced Placement Honors Last year, 69 students from Hopkins High School earned AP Scholar honors by the College Board in recognition of their exceptional achievement on the college –level advanced placement (AP) exams. Only about 13 percent of the more than 840,000 students who took the AP exams in May 2001 performed at a sufficiently high level to merit this recognition. The College Board recognizes several levels of achievement based on the number of yearlong courses and exams. AP examinations, which - students take after completing challeng- ing college –level courses, are graded on a five –point scale. At Hopkins High School: • 11 students qualified for the AP Scholar with Distinction Award by earning an "average grade of if least 3.5 on all AP exams taken, and grades of 3 or higher on five or more of these exams • 23 students qualified for the AP Scholar with Honor Award by earning an average grade of at least 3.25 on all AP Exams taken, and grades of 3 or higher on four or more of those exams • 35 students qualified for the AP Scholar Award by. completing three or more AP exams with grades of 3 or higher ACT Composite Scores 1999 -00 to 2001 -02 1999 -00 Hopkins 23.7 Minnesota 22 National 21 2000-01 Hopkins 23.6 Minnesota 22.1 National 21 2001 -02 Hopkins 23.5 Minnesota 22.1 National 20.8 2. 23.5 23 22.5 22 21.5 21 20.5 20 1909.00 2000.01 2001 -02 } -*- � Each year, District 270 students surpass national and state comparisons on the ACT. Sixty Nine Students Earn Advanced Placement Honors Last year, 69 students from Hopkins High School earned AP Scholar honors by the College Board in recognition of their exceptional achievement on the college –level advanced placement (AP) exams. Only about 13 percent of the more than 840,000 students who took the AP exams in May 2001 performed at a sufficiently high level to merit this recognition. The College Board recognizes several levels of achievement based on the number of yearlong courses and exams. AP examinations, which - students take after completing challeng- ing college –level courses, are graded on a five –point scale. At Hopkins High School: • 11 students qualified for the AP Scholar with Distinction Award by earning an "average grade of if least 3.5 on all AP exams taken, and grades of 3 or higher on five or more of these exams • 23 students qualified for the AP Scholar with Honor Award by earning an average grade of at least 3.25 on all AP Exams taken, and grades of 3 or higher on four or more of those exams • 35 students qualified for the AP Scholar Award by. completing three or more AP exams with grades of 3 or higher Resident Volunteers Help Establish District's Budgets A volunteer group of District 270 residents, known as the Citizens Financial Advisory Committee (CFAC), annually reviews the District's financial picture and recommends expense limits to the Hopkins Board of Education (School Board). Before the School Board approves any expense modifications, the District's Program –Based Budgeting (PBB) Committee examines those recommendations. The PBB, now in its eighth year, is made up of District staff members, residents, students, and business professionals. Committee members look at and prioritize all District services to ensure that available financial resources are allocated to programs providing the most benefit compared to the cost of delivery, and moving most effectively toward achieving the District's mission. Following the superintendent's review, the prioritized list of services is sent to the School Board for approval. The approved list determines which services will be funded and to what extent for the following fiscal year. Class —Size Reduction Efforts The Hopkins School District annually receives about $1.1 million from the state that it must use for class –size reduction efforts. District 270 targets this money at its youngest learners in kindergarten through 3rd grade, hiring Learning Resource Teachers, who are licensed teachers, to reduce the teacher –to– student ratios in those classrooms. The average student –to- teacher ratio in kindergarten is 13:1, and the average student –to– teacher ratio in 1st -3rd grades is 17:1. Volunteer Honor Kristine Lamoreux was named Minnesota's top middle school volunteer of the year and one of Minnesota's two State Honorees in the 2002 Prudential Spirit of Community Awards Program. Kristine was selected for her work in creating a web site to inform young people of the volunteer opportunities available to them in this area. National Debater Brian Klaas won the Greater Midwestern Novice National Debate Championship in Lincoln – Douglas debate with an 8-1 record. Prior to the national championship, Brian won the Minnesota Novice State Tournament with a 10-0 record. He also finished fifth at the Glenbrooks Junior Varsity Lincoln – Douglas Tournament, which is one of the most competitive and prestigious debate events held in the country, and had strong finishes in varsity debate tournaments in New Orleans and Palo Alto, CA. Current Events Graham Gisselquist scored 110 points out of a possible 120 points in the National Current Events League competition, earning him a medal for being among the highest scoring 9th graders nationally. Budget Total All Funds $91,512,093 $92,095,348 $ 4,720,877 $89,841,356 $91,539,859 $ 3,364,671 2000 -01 Pupils in Average Daily Membership (ADM): 8,477 2000 -01 Operating Cost Per Average Daily Membership: $9,751 Transportation 4.38% Food Service 3.09% Community Service 7.03% Capital outlay 2.95% Community Se LZ Debt Redemption 5.41% -Trus Food Service 3.46' UApencv 1.66% 2001 -02 Expenditures Debt Redemption 5.84% 2001 -02 Revenues Budget and audit information for Hopkins School District 270 is available from District 270's Business Office at 952- 988 -4001. L] L3 U District Adopts Balanced 2002 -03 Budget In March 2002, the Hopkins School Board approved a $73.772 million general fund expenditure budget for 2002 -03. The budget is balanced and creates a $500,000 fund reserve. The 2002 -03 budget represents $2.85 million worth of adjustments, including reductions in staff and cuts to programs and services. Those cuts fall on top of $7.7 million worth of budget adjustments made over the past two years, representing about 10 percent of the Hopkins School District's general fund budget. In 2002 -03, the School District hopes to raise revenues through activity/athletic fees, and by charging fees for community use of the District's facilities. It is estimated that the fee increases will generate about $70,000 in revenue, including $11,000 from the High School fees; $22,000 from the athletics and activities fees; $30,000 from the lunch and breakfast price increases; and $7,000 from the rental of music instruments. The District also is charging a $3 per hour fee for the use of District facilities by nonprofit and community based groups. The goal is to generate $100,000 in revenue during 2002 -03, which can be accomplished with 33,333 hours of rental time. Currently, these groups use the District's facilities for a total of 41,700 hours each year. It appears that the District's financial worries are not over. With the state's current long -term budget shortfall Ll Ll Ll Trust/Agency 1.76% predictions, funding for fiscal years 2004 and 2005 looks shaky. To prepare for that difficult journey, the District is taking a careful, indepth look at some specific budget areas, including: • Community Education - sponsored elementary orchestra and band programs • KHOP program model and associated costs • enrollment trends, ensuring that the District's buildings are being used in the most cost -effective manner possible • open - enrollment policy, including a cost - benefit analysis • special education paraprofessional study • laundry service • identification of costs incurred by activities that are scheduled outside of the normal work schedule Involvement Encouraged There are a number of ways residents can become involved in the District's budget- setting process, including: • attending budget information meetings, which are scheduled for 7 p.m. Tuesday, Feb. 4, and 6 p.m. Thursday, Feb. 20, in the Board Room at the Eisenhower Community Center, 1001 Highway 7, Hopkins • providing input through the District's budget input voicemail line at 952- 988 -4173 • providing input via e-mail at budget-input@hopkins.kl2.mn.us • helping with legislative advocacy by joining District 270's Legislative Action Coalition —to receive information via e-mail, send your name and e-mail address to eileen- harvala @hopkins.kI2.mn.us Revenues & Expenditures 2001 -02 Fund 2000-01 Actual 2000-01 Actual June 30, 2001 2001 -02 Budget 2001 -02 Budget June 30, 2002 Revenues & Expenditures & Actual Balance Revenues & Expenditures & Projected Transfers In Transfers Out Transfers In Transfers Out Fund Balance General $75,778,421 $76,202,058 $ 2,387,839 $73,482,364 $75,750,137 $ 120,066 Food Service $ 2,995,318 $ 3,219,776 $ 868,810 $ 3,118,598 $ 2,837,500 $ 1,149,908 Community Service $ 6,172,070 $ 6,202,450 $ (- 479,306) $ 6,385,372 $ 6,444,670 $ (- 196,287) Debt Redemption $ 5,012,024 $ 4,967,713 $ 1,868,530 $ 5,256,500 $ 4,962,502 $ 2,162,528 Agency $ 1,468,002 $ 1,437,101 $ 42,503 $ 1,570,022 $ 1,513,500 $ 99,005 Trust $ 86,258 $ 66,250 $ 32,501 $ 28,500 $ 31,550 $ 29,451 Total All Funds $91,512,093 $92,095,348 $ 4,720,877 $89,841,356 $91,539,859 $ 3,364,671 2000 -01 Pupils in Average Daily Membership (ADM): 8,477 2000 -01 Operating Cost Per Average Daily Membership: $9,751 Transportation 4.38% Food Service 3.09% Community Service 7.03% Capital outlay 2.95% Community Se LZ Debt Redemption 5.41% -Trus Food Service 3.46' UApencv 1.66% 2001 -02 Expenditures Debt Redemption 5.84% 2001 -02 Revenues Budget and audit information for Hopkins School District 270 is available from District 270's Business Office at 952- 988 -4001. L] L3 U District Adopts Balanced 2002 -03 Budget In March 2002, the Hopkins School Board approved a $73.772 million general fund expenditure budget for 2002 -03. The budget is balanced and creates a $500,000 fund reserve. The 2002 -03 budget represents $2.85 million worth of adjustments, including reductions in staff and cuts to programs and services. Those cuts fall on top of $7.7 million worth of budget adjustments made over the past two years, representing about 10 percent of the Hopkins School District's general fund budget. In 2002 -03, the School District hopes to raise revenues through activity/athletic fees, and by charging fees for community use of the District's facilities. It is estimated that the fee increases will generate about $70,000 in revenue, including $11,000 from the High School fees; $22,000 from the athletics and activities fees; $30,000 from the lunch and breakfast price increases; and $7,000 from the rental of music instruments. The District also is charging a $3 per hour fee for the use of District facilities by nonprofit and community based groups. The goal is to generate $100,000 in revenue during 2002 -03, which can be accomplished with 33,333 hours of rental time. Currently, these groups use the District's facilities for a total of 41,700 hours each year. It appears that the District's financial worries are not over. With the state's current long -term budget shortfall Ll Ll Ll Trust/Agency 1.76% predictions, funding for fiscal years 2004 and 2005 looks shaky. To prepare for that difficult journey, the District is taking a careful, indepth look at some specific budget areas, including: • Community Education - sponsored elementary orchestra and band programs • KHOP program model and associated costs • enrollment trends, ensuring that the District's buildings are being used in the most cost -effective manner possible • open - enrollment policy, including a cost - benefit analysis • special education paraprofessional study • laundry service • identification of costs incurred by activities that are scheduled outside of the normal work schedule Involvement Encouraged There are a number of ways residents can become involved in the District's budget- setting process, including: • attending budget information meetings, which are scheduled for 7 p.m. Tuesday, Feb. 4, and 6 p.m. Thursday, Feb. 20, in the Board Room at the Eisenhower Community Center, 1001 Highway 7, Hopkins • providing input through the District's budget input voicemail line at 952- 988 -4173 • providing input via e-mail at budget-input@hopkins.kl2.mn.us • helping with legislative advocacy by joining District 270's Legislative Action Coalition —to receive information via e-mail, send your name and e-mail address to eileen- harvala @hopkins.kI2.mn.us Hopkins Online Academy== =--- The virtual doors of the Hopki nline Academy (HOA) —an interactive online i rter school for 9th - 12th graders created by Hopkins School Distet 21fl opened in September 2 0-1 The Ho�'cins chool `� leading lZar the o letli � � fthi s online charter high school al}out tree year f ago. The District began this process 1by tali king a o t tie future;of education in the state and�in �o kins o 1 . How s � uld°District 270 best imnlemen the staff ' tandarai,base&eraduation requirements? glow cou d th DfistriIrFbest Utilize the talents of its retiring teac rsca istrat � could Hopkins best meet th flexible scheduling needs -e teachers and students? An�th6vuc�ul3-Vonkins:�sc ool— District 270 best meet th F han, an"volving � education needs of todps students? A visit to an online chart r s -in l a. tteville-,N-C.; created a "can-do" attitude amon istm. t- 2_7$_'s -Df llne--` program developers':T at- visit-he ed-t emFi realize th impact that online classes couud�hav students. Th ough oril e course, Hopkins could offex students P�-�__ -�. opportunities to(explore areas,gf in crest, take courses in an electronic learn inLvenvircitment::-or lnmco etc The Hopkins Scho�B oar prove ed funding for an online course development pilot project, enabling District 270 staff members to develop and offer online courses for two years. The hallmarks of the online offerings are that they represent Hopkins' tried- and -true quality courses, which already are offered to the District's 9th -12th grade students. The courses are developed and taught by experienced Hopkins teachers who have modified their course delivery to an online learning environment. The District began offering its online courses in the fall of the 2000 -01 school year, starting with chemistry, biology, and astronomy. By the end of the 2001 -02 school year, the District offered 10 online courses in seven subject areas, and summer school courses also were available. With funding for the pilot online project coming to an end, the District began exploring the possibility of creating its own online charter school. District 270 was notified in March 2002 that its online charter school application had been approved by the state, paving the way for full development of the Hopkins Online Academy's educational program. With the state's approval, the District will receive about $500,000 in state and federal charter school program - development funds for three years. The Hopkins Online Academy has a close, interactive, symbiotic relationship with its sponsor —the Hopkins School District. For example, Hopkins teachers who have been trained in the development and delivery of online courses teach the classes for the HOA. As a separate entity, however, the Hopkins Online Academy has its own school district number, and is contracting for services from the Hopkins School District such as business and payroll services, technology services, special education services, and classroom space. Tuition agreements will give students from outside the Hopkins School District access to and credit from the Hopkins Online Academy. Once all of the courses are developed for a full 9th - 12th grade program, it would be possible for students to complete their high school education online; however, for most students the Hopkins Online Academy will be a part-time learning experience. Students register for the Hopkins Online Academy via the Internet. Students taking the online courses receive training before their classes begin, including how to work in a chatroom environment. The Hopkins Online Academy classes function very much like traditional classrooms and courses. Students complete most of their course work autonomously from their home computers; however, just like traditional classrooms, the courses are time structured, with specific due dates for the completion of course work. The also take tests and complete other course dents ' e required to meet with their peers and r in an ine atroom environment. This tr � , m enviro en s multimedia, enabling both text au 'o exchan s t� occur between the teacher and lent 1 and the s ants with their classmates. Teachers able �o use gra hIcs, PowerPoint presentations, ;os, a d streaming audio as part of their course rental -ons. Teachers and students also communicate i Va. 1 other via e-mail. For example, teachers can i ss reports and the results of tests and assess- it to t fir students electronically. its s hronous, real -time learning environment is t t dis }nguishes the Hopkins Online Academy courses from n611-interactive or into the HOA, e�rses are most of the lstate's luation sta ards, enabling studee- olmeet tionx_�ciuirements as well= s- complete their course �r� )' the end of dKee"years, all 24 of the ®state's dua�tion standards wee em added into the HopQfine Academy's'Lcourses.� In the 2002 -03 school yea h$ Hoop ins nline Acade4 offering 18 differpt courses in� ;wid° ne°ty of different subject area �In order for each -stir dent to receive personalized ttention, class ize il` be limited to a maximum of 12 Adents.,r' `! Information about the Hopkins 8nhne Acade be obtained via voicemail, 952- 988 -4039; e-mail at HOA@hopkins.k I 2.mn.us; or web site at www.hopkins.kI2.mn.us (programs and services menu). Educational Opportunities Hopkins School District 270 continues to expand its educational opportunities to meet the needs of children of all ages. Recognizing the importance of early child- hood education, the District has enhanced the array of educational options available for young children and their families. Stepping Stones is a year -round program designed for 4- year -olds in their year before kindergarten. The program combines preschool with childcare. Stepping Stones is offered at Meadowbrook Elementary School, and is a collaborative effort of Kaleidoscope Preschool and Kids & Company. In September 2001, the Primary Project was introduced at the Harley Hopkins Family Center and Katherine Curren Elementary School. Primary Project is designed to enhance children's learning by reducing the social, emotional, and school adjustment issues of preschool and early elementary aged students. Beginning this fall, District 270 is piloting a his referral program is designed to promote school ..adiness and success, and children will advance to. indergarten the following year. High Five is located at .atherine Curren Elementary School, and- serves the .tendance.areas of Katherine Curren, Alice Smith, and isenhower elementary schools. It serves 20 children ,ho will be turning 5 years old between Sept." 2,and lec. _31, who are not,scheduled to entIer kindergarten; id who', have limited.preschool.experiences. A Special K referral program is.for students :who have -en identified by their kindergarten`teachers as°needin; r benefiting from an all- day'kindergarten program, Th .assroom teachers and Kids & Company�Special K the "cliildrenparticipating in this extended-day .ning opportunity. The students work on letter nber recognition, small -motor skills develo}pm I language, development. Special K is a referral gram. san m," encoriipassmg the full school day. The daily le- cludes a= varietyof opportunities_ that, build �nd academic skills through- projects, group . es,, individu "al choice activities, quiet play, and time -, Teacher of the Year Barb Stoflet, a first and second grade teacher at Hopkins. School District 270's Gatewood Elementary . School in Minnetonka, was named the 2001 Minnesota Teacher of the Year. In 1990, Barb was hired by the Hopkins School District to teach 4th grade at Gatewood. Her entire career in District 270 has been spent at Gatewood, where Barb has taught first through fourth grades. In addition, Barb has served as the math curriculum leader at Gatewood since 1997. She has also worked as a yearbook adviser and a team leader at Gatewood. Barb has a master's degree in experiential education from Mankato State University, and a bachelor's degree in elementary education with an emphasis on reading and a minor in music from Bemidji State University. Art Honors Evan Drolet -Cook won the Pinnacle Award for filmmaking —the National Scholastic Art Award's highest national honor. Evan received this prestigious award after winning a:Gold Key in the Minnesota Scholastic Art Award Competition. Nationwide, more than 15,000 entries were received in state Scholastic Art Award competitions, with 250 Gold Keys given in 14 different categories. In each of these 14 categories, one top award was given= the Pinnacle. Lindsay Schwartz won the Art Educators of Minnesota's Youth Art Month state flag contest. Her flag flew over the Capitol in Washington, D.C. as part of the Youth Art Month opening flag ceremony, and then in Miami at the National Art Educators Association's national conference, before returning' .home to Hopkins'North Junior High. ' All —State Musicians Seven Hopkins High School students Were selected to All -State bands for the 200142 school year by the Minnesota Music Educators Association (MMEA). Only one high school in the state had more All -State band selections than Hopkins High School. Students named to the All -State Jazz Band included Theodore Anderson on trombone, and ` Joseph O'Conor and Joseph Sikorski, both on trumpet. All -State Concert Band selections included Jeanette Clark on baritone and Kaicy MacLeod on trumpet. Students.named to the All -State Symphonic Band included Kristin Kusche on percussion and Jacqueline Thompson on clarinet. Owen Tucker was selected to perform in the 2002 Minnesota Band Directors Association's 9th and 10th grade All -State Band. Owen was one of 75 students from the state selected to . participate in the band. More than 300 students auditioned for a spot in the Honors Choir Rhea Pappas performed with the American Choral Director's Association Regional Honors Choir. More than 100 students from throughout Minnesota auditioned for a spot representing Minnesota in the choir. Mission As a caring community of learners, embracing diversity, and constantly striving for excellence, the Hopkins School District declares as its mission to instill in each learner a passion for learning and a commitment to reach one's potential throughout life by creating participatory learning experiences that are challenging, relevant, and dynamic. School Board Members of the Hopkins Board of Education (School Board): Chair Tim Bergstedt Vice Chair Susan Scharenbroich Treasurer Dale Feste Director Paul Bengtson Director Sheri Bryan Davis Director Barbara Klaas Director Laura Ronbeck Superintendent Michael L. Kremer, Ph.D. Alternate Formats This document is available in alternate formats. To make a request, contact the District's Communications Office at 952 - 988 -4024. This report is available on the District's web site at www.hopkins.kl2.mn.us. Mandated Report Hopkins School District 270's 2002 annual report meets a state mandate, requiring its distribution to all Hopkins School District 270 residents. For further information, contact Editor Eileen Hanrala, District 270's communications coordinator, at 952 - 988 -4024 or eileen_harvala @hopkins.kl 2.mn.us. Graduate Study For the fifth year, Hopkins School District 270 has hired Decision Resources, Ltd., a Minneapolis —based research firm to conduct a survey of its one —year and five —year graduates. Below is just a sampling of the survey results. ❑ ❑ ❑ For the fifth year, Hopkins School District conducted a survey of its one —year and five —year graduates. Information from the survey helps the District identify its strengths and weaknesses through the eyes of its graduates. Decision Resources, Ltd., interviewed 200 randomly selected 2001 Hopkins High graduates and 200 randomly selected 1997 Hopkins High School graduates. This year's five —year graduates were one — year graduates when the District conducted its first graduate follow —up study five years ago. Decision Resources was able to re —connect with 65 percent of the 1997 graduates that it interviewed five years ago. Survey highlights include the following: • Most of the graduates said that they intended to pursue four —year college programs, indicating that college preparation was still the focus for the majority of Hopkins High School graduates. There appears to be a downward trend in the percentage of graduates who said that they planned to attend a four —year college, from 72 percent to 62 percent. • Sixty—three percent of the 1997 high school graduates are college graduates, 6 percent are community college graduates, and 5 percent have obtained technical degrees. • Eighty-five percent of the graduates reported that their high school experiences were "very helpful" or "somewhat helpful" in preparation for what they are doing now. The students who thought that they would not attend four —year colleges tended to be the most negative about their high school experiences. In particular, they felt somewhat more unprepared for the interpersonal dynamics of work, especially working with others of diverse backgrounds. Hopkins School District 270 1001 Highway 7 Hopkins, MN 55305 952 - 988 -4024 www.hopkins.kl2; mn.us Passion for Learning ... Learning for Life ❑ ❑ ❑ • A growing number of high school graduates have added part—time work to their post — secondary education schedule. As a result of the need to balance these competing demands, graduates tended to feel unprepared for living on their own and financial responsibilities. • For the college - bound, about a quarter of the 1997 graduates indicated that taking more Advanced Placement classes would be the one thing that they would do differently in high school. In addition to taking more challenging courses, graduates said that they would take a greater variety of courses and study more. • Sixty percent of the graduates thought their college classes were either "very difficult" or "somewhat difficult" while the remaining 40 percent saw them as either "not too difficult" or "not at all difficult." • Preparation in English and mathematics remained the key strengths of Hopkins' academic program with the majority of graduates reporting that they felt adequately prepared for these courses. • When asked about their most momentous high school experiences, graduates highlighted sports teams, specific teachers and specific classes. Teachers and special classroom and course experiences generated the greatest memories and highlights for the graduates. • More than 90 percent of the graduates said that they would recommend Hopkins Public Schools to others, which is one of the highest percentages in the suburban metro area, indicating Hopkins High School graduates' loyalty to their alma mater. * * * * * ECRWSS * * District 270 Resident WWW.hopkinS. Serving the communities of k12 • mn us Hopkins, Minnetonka, Golden Valley, Eden Prairie, Edina, Plymouth, & St. Louis Park Nonprofit Org. U.S. Postage PAID Hopkins, MN 55343 Permit #160 TIME VALUE 30,000 children improved. academically. 60, 000 people..received 'employment and. job readinesa 'skills. 23,000 tamiliea found attordable housing. 472,000 meals were provided to tamilliea in need. 22,000 individuals gained access to health care... ' limes in the generosity of orpankadm dak awplaysm and imian membea likeugbW Bra Twin 6Mes !�.aed W4ay is aneroviae a>� ads ---f Special thanks lathe /ollorivmg For providing outstanding support m in 2002 5250AD Club (condoned) Faegre &Benson LLP CeP.Gemni Emat & Young son Co p riles . Ca m e Im ignii Insi nia Systems Inc. 8 PeopleNet Communications Corporation MM and for continued support Fairview Health Services* Champion Al m ` Intermediate School District 287• Polaris Industries The'Diataond $ocielr "(5 Million Plus) Fingerhut Companies Inc.* Chicago Title Insurance Company .:; " Children's Home Society of Mmne'sota International Muhiloods Corporation. J.C. Penney. Company, Inc. Pfemier Bank Premier Dental Lab, Inc. General Mills Inc; H.B. Fuller Company Land O'Lakes Inc CHS Cooper$tives• ..: Jerryls Fob.. Prime Therapeutics Inc. Mllhon Blue Circle : ` Lockheed Martin* `_�' CNS Inc. Jewish Children & Family Services Jewish Family Service of St. Paul . Project for Pridq in Living Quality Assured Label Inc-.:. 3M " " American Express FlnanciaMdvisori, Lund Food.Holdings,.lna! M' &_I.Marshall & Islay Be - Computer:Network Technol °�'" Council on Crime &Justice Jobview.com Katun Corporation Resource, Inc flimage Corporation . - Inc Best Bu Co., Inc.. Northwest Airlines; Ina• Reliant est Minna est o•. Energy g Courage Center Cramer Building Services! Land O'Lakes Liberty Diversified Industries Rudy Luthees.Toyota• Sebattiaim Community Center Cargill Honeywell International* Rosemount Inc..' Seagate Technology. oBY i CUB Foods• Culligan Soft Water Service-Cm! Liberty State Bank Ueberroan Company The Salvation Ar my Scott Carver- Dakota CAP Agencyy, Inc. Ina $UPERVALU INC.* " Star Tribune Tennant Comparry Custom-Research Untax:- "Division of Encompass Group Lunds Food Holding, Inc. Second Harvest Heartland St Francis Regional Medical Center* Target Corporation (Target Stores, Marshall Fleld's, The Toro Company* Travelers Express Company, Inc. Datecard Corporation Dealers Group Lutheran Social Service of Minnesota St Jude Medical, Inc. Mervyn's) Unisys Corporation* DecoPac Inc. Mahoney, Ulbrich, Christiansen State Farm Insurance Comparmiea U.S. Bancorp University of Minnesota* " = -- Deloltte & Touche LLP Deluxe Corporation & Russ, PJL Mainstreet Bank Star Tribune . The Storefront Group Wells Fargo Minnesota Xcel Energy Inc.* r Fs iog *0 way as lis®s vnti r Direct Response Insurance Malt-"eel, Summit University Teen Center �` rs mtt�ttd� m iN�asa Administration Services, Inc. (DRIASI) Marco Business Products SUPERVALU INC.* S750J100 Club Minnesota �jaDpgl0perc�tarlmtla��1 = Dora & Whitney P Dorsey et' Eastman Kodak Company MedArnicus, Inc- Medical Arts Press SUPERVALU Northern Region* Tennant Company BlueCross BlueShield of ING ReliaSter � - - -- 3M•. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Medtronic, Inc. Therotech rn 'nnesote Life C Dain Rauscher Ina Abbott Northwestern Hospital* Adventek Face to Face Health &Counseling Services Mercy & Unity Hospitals- Merrick Community Services Thrivent Financial for Lutherans Time Warner Cable -40AM Club Aetna US Healthcare Fairview Health Services' Federal Cartridge Company Mesaba Aviation* Michael Foods Inc.* The Toro Company Travelers Express Company ADC Telecommunications, Inc. Alliance Bank Allied Group Insurance Federal Express Mid - Minnesota Legal Assistance Turek Inc- Allina Hospitals & Clinics* Allina Hospitals &,Clinics• FilmTec Corporation- Midwest Family Mutual Twin Cities RISEI Allina Medical Clinic . Allina Medical Clinic* Flynn, Gaskins & Bennett hlsurance Company U.S. Bancorp Abbott Northwestern Hospital American Heart Association, Inc. Ford Motor Company Midwest Sign & Screen Printing U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffrey Mercy "& Unity Hospitals United Hospital American Medical Systems Fortla Heath G &K Services, Inc.* Supply Company Minnesota Visiting Nurse Agency United Hospital- United Parcel Service* Su Francis Regional Medical Center American Red Cross m the n Paul Area*.- General Casually Insurance Morey's Seafood International UnumProvident Corporation, Carlson Companies, Inc. API Group* Companies Moss &Barnett Upsher Smith Laboratories Greco Inc. apogee Enterprises, Ina. General Dynamics Aviation Services MotivAction URS Guidant Corporation ARC. Hennepin-Carver, Inc. Girl Scout Council of SL Croix Valley Mutual of America Valepar Corporation The St. Paul Companies, Inc. Arthritis Foundation, GMAC RFC NCS Pearson Vision'Ease Lens Thrivent Financial for.Lutherans North Central Chapter Greco InG Neighbors, Irma ° Volunteers of America of Minnesota United Parcel Service (UPS)' Greater Minneapolis Convention New Foundations Voyager Financial Services West Group B� men's• & Visitors Association Nordstrom Wells Fargo Financial Acceptance 00 $3111 Club Banta Book Group* Guldant HDR Engineering Norstan• Northwest Airlines* Western Petroleum Co. WPS Wisconsin Physician Services Alliance Capital Management CHS Cooperatives* Barr Engineering Best Buy Co., Inc. The Heys Group, Ina Northwestern Foods, Inc. Xpel Energy Inc Conseco Finance Corporation Bloomingdale's HeaithEast• Oildyne Division Parker Hannifin Corp. YMCA of Metropolitan Minneapolis Deloitte & Touche LLP Board of Pensions ELCA. Help/Systems Inc. Boy Scouts of America - Viking Council Henson & Efron, P.A. Opportunity Partners, Inc. Opus' • Includes union participation Deluxe Corporatign Donaldson Company, Inc. Bremer Bank Camp Fire USA Minnesota Council Hertz Corporation Hmong American Partnership Osmonits Paper, Calmenson & Co.* Dorsey & Whitney LLP Ecolab Inc. Campbell Mithun Horton, Inc. j Pentair, Inc. EDINA PARK BOARD 7:00 P.M. EDINA COUNCIL CHAMBERS SEPTEMBER 11, 2002 MEMBERS PRESENT: Andy Finsness, Mike Damman, Allyson Grande, Karla Sitek, Tom White, Ardis Wexler, George Klus, Jeff Johnson MEMBERS ABSENT: Floyd Grabiel, Linda Presthus, David Fredlund STAFF PRESENT: John Keprios, Ed MacHolda, Janet Canton, Tom Shirley, Ann Kattreh OTHERS PRESENT: Phyllis Strong, Joan McCarthy, Reynee Barta, Diane Kulbeck I. APPROVAL OF THE TUESDAY, JUNE 11, 2002 PARK BOARD MINUTES George Klus MOVED TO APPROVE THE JUNE 11, 2002 PARK BOARD MINUTES. Ardis Wexler SECONDED THE MOTION. MINUTES APPROVED. II. EDINBOROUGH PARK PLAYGROUND AND PARK USER FEE PROPOSAL — TOM SHIRLEY Tom Shirley, Manager of Edinborough and Centennial Lakes, explained that ever since Edinborough Park opened in 1987 they have charged a fee for the pool, track and ice rink. What they are proposing now is that there also be a charge for the use of the lower level amenities that previously were free. Those would include the tot lot, great hall and grotto areas. He noted they would like to charge two separate fees, one for the track/pool and the other a general park fee. They would also like to have a resident and non - resident rate. Currently they are proposing to charge $2.50 for residents and $3.50 for non- residents for the general park areas. Mr. Shirley pointed out that the main reason they are proposing a fee is because the park is losing money and they need revenue. This past year was their best ever and yet they still were just under a $100,000 loss. He noted that unfortunately it's only going to get worse because all of their revenue sources are tapped out and all of the development is completely finished. Mr. Shirley stated that in addition they are also going to start having a lot of new maintenance bills as the building ages. Mr. Shirley indicated that they would also like to have some money to fund new programs in the Great Hall. Also, if a fee is charged, they will have a better control mechanism because they cannot always accommodate the large number of people that show up. He noted that when they are extremely crowded it becomes a safety issue. Mr. Shirley stated that their survey found that 70% of the users of Edinborough Park are non - residents. Unfortunately, they are ultimately losing money that will come back to the taxpayers. Currently they are not receiving any tax revenues, however, if things continue as they are in approximately 15 years that will definitely change. Therefore, they are trying to head that off as much as they can. Mr. Shirley indicated that they are also looking at putting in a new tot lot, which would help make the fees a little more tolerable to everyone. He pointed out that in 1987 the tot lot was built and it does not meet current safety standards for new equipment. He noted that when the main slide broke they had to remove it and were not able to replace it because of the new safety standards. Mr. Shirley commented that the existing play equipment and location is undersized and it is scheduled to be replaced next year and noted that a new soft sided play structure in that same area would cost approximately $90,000 and would still be undersized. He explained that staff is proposing to take out the ice rink and put in a new playground structure in that space which would be a lot larger and nicer structure and would only cost approximately $56,000. He stated that with the current safety zones standards, about three spring animals would be the only traditional play structure items that could go in the current location and that is why they started looking at using the ice rink area as the new play structure area. Mr. Shirley pointed out that currently the ice rink is losing money and added that in the next few years it will need a new Zamboni and chiller system, which are very expensive items. Therefore, they needed to take a hard look at that area because it doesn't make sense to spend $130,000 to $140,000 on an undersized ice rink when it's losing money. Mr. Shirley indicated that they feel this is a win, win situation for the most part because they will actually receive revenues and be able to provide more programs and make it an even better park. Mr. Keprios noted that he included in the Park Board packet a newspaper clipping regarding Town Square Park in St. Paul. He noted that Town Square Park is an indoor park that was originally developed to operate under somewhat the same financial model as Edinborough Park. However, after years of operating at a deficit, St. Paul finally decided to sell the park property. The Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Park model relies on revenues from program and rental fees & charges, monthly fees from businesses and residents, and interest earnings from a trust fund to pay for all of the operating expenses. Unfortunately, the expenses exceed revenues each year and the deficit is being paid by the trust fund principle, which in turn earns even less interest the following year. Without corrective action, this cycle will spiral downward to where the trust fund is going to run out all together and the deficit expense will fall on the shoulders of the general taxpayer of Edina. Mr. Shirley added that at one point it was estimated the trust fund would be 9 million dollars and the highest it ever got was 5.2 million. However, because of some of the developments did not become as large as was initially planned, 2 the trust fund keeps going down and at the present rate it will hit zero in approximately 14 years and they are trying to keep that from happening. Mr. Keprios explained that the proposal is not a dislike for the ice rink but rather we need to come up with some creative ideas to reduce expenses and collect revenues, especially in light of the fact that 70% of the users are non - residents. He noted that he feels Mr. Shirley and Ms. Kattreh have come up with a great solution. Mr. Keprios stated that he does not want to see us end up like Town Square Park in St. Paul. Ms. Wexler asked if the people who are coming in for concerts and entertainment be charged a fee. Mr. Shirley replied that the concerts would still be free because the whole upper level would need to be kept open for people to be able to go from the hotel to the deli. He explained that they would probably try to use that as a marketing tool, especially the children's programs because once they have attended a free concert they will see what else Edinborough has to offer. Mr. Klus asked what would be left in the park that would be free to which Mr. Shirley replied that the whole upper level where you can walk around as well as the amphitheatre where the concerts are held. Ms. Wexler asked if there is an estimate on what it would cost in labor to maintain a ticket booth. Mr. Shirley responded that currently they have the front desk that people need to walk past, although it's not the greatest situation. He explained that they are thinking there would be one wristband for both the pool/track and another wristband for the general park area. He noted that they do have maintenance people controlling the park who keep an eye on everything. Mr. Klus indicated that a lot of these play areas have been put in shopping centers and have not done too well and asked Mr. Shirley how well he thinks this would do at Edinborough. Mr. Shirley replied that the majority of the play areas in the shopping centers have been very small, at Edinborough it would be more of an outdoor play structure that just happens to be indoors. He also noted that their prices would not be as high as the places Mr. Klus is referring to. Mr. Shirley indicated that he thinks it would probably be quite successful and if it doesn't work they are still ahead of the game because right now people are getting in for free. He also pointed out that from the survey that was conducted approximately 70% of the people said they would pay a nominal fee to use the park. Ms. Kattreh commented that the number one thing that people said in the survey was that they wanted a larger play structure and would be willing to pay to use it. Mr. Klus noted that he thinks if people go to an outdoor park it's free and feels just because it is indoors it should still be free. Mr. Shirley replied that as a stand alone play structure he's not sure people will pay and that is why they want to be able to offer other activities in the Great Hall. Mr. White asked how the arrangement would work with the hotel guests to which Mr. Shirley explained the hotel would have to pay a higher rate than what they are currently paying and added that they will be working with the hotel management. 1•� Mr. White asked about the pre - school that's located in Edinborough and asked if they receive free passes to the park. Mr. Shirley replied that they would have to work something out with them. He noted that currently they are not allowed to use the tot lot at certain times during the day because they don't have enough space. Mr. White asked if families would be able to purchase a membership instead of paying individually each time to which Mr. Shirley replied definitely. He also added that they are looking at having a maximum of $10.00 per family per day so that it doesn't become overwhelming. Mr. White indicated that he has gone to the Great Hall many times and noted that it is no fun when you go and it is being set up for a wedding. He asked how the wedding situations would be handled. Mr. Shirley responded that they are thinking about pulling back on their wedding business in the winter when people really want to use the indoor park. He noted that currently there are not a lot of events planned for Friday nights. However, for Saturdays they would maybe need to close the Great Hall at 2:00 p.m. and then re -open on Sunday mornings. Mr. White commented that he thought we make a lot of money on wedding rentals to which Mr. Shirley replied that is correct but currently they are only renting 50% of the Friday evenings at Edinborough and most of those are in the spring and summer. He added that when they put the numbers together if they had certain hours from November through April it wouldn't have too much of an effect. He noted that they would have approximately an $8,000 charge they would have to offset which he thinks they can do with admissions on Friday nights. Mr. White asked if the play structure moves to where the ice rink is what would happen to the space that is currently the play area. Mr. Shirley explained that they are still debating that. One idea is to turn it into a picnic area that could be rented out for birthday parties, etc. However, the only problem with that is once they take out the swings they cannot put them back in because of code and right now they are grandfathered in. Therefore, they are also looking at keeping the area as a tot lot for the smaller children because of the bucket swings. Phyllis Strong, resident of Centennial Lakes Village Homes, noted that as residents they have free use of the pool and track and asked if they would have to pay a nominal fee if this all comes about. Mr. Shirley explained that there would not be a nominal fee added on to the pool and track. There would only be a fee for the play structure and Great Hall. He also commented that there may be a small charge for people who are coming in to baby -sit grandchildren, etc. Mr. Klus indicated that he feels there are still a lot of conceptual things that need to be put together and he's not so sure that they can vote on this tonight. Ms. Wexler asked if they are looking for a vote to go ahead and redevelop it further at this point. Mr. White noted that he would like to see a more concrete plan or idea before it goes on to the City Council. However, maybe you want to get the Park Board's input and then put together your plan so that you don't spend all of your time doing something just for us to tell you 4 we never wanted you to do that in the first place. Mr. White noted that he would also like to hear some other ideas and asked if they have thought about a theme play structure because people may be more apt to use that than just a regular play structure. Mr. Shirley replied that they have looked at several different plans regarding theme parks. However, the one they are looking at seriously would cost approximately $56,000 whereas the theme structures cost three to four times that much. Ms. Wexler asked if it is reasonable that the Park Board vote to support the concept at this point. Mr. Shirley responded that the big issue is the concept of charging a fee and if the support is there then they can develop a plan with more specifics. He noted that they would probably be making changes until the last minute, however, the main one would be that the ice rink would probably go next summer. Mr. Klus asked how much additional revenue they are hoping to raise by doing this to which Mr. Shirley replied approximately $112,000. Mr. Finsness commented that he can sympathize with the loss in revenue but what we have at Edinborough Park with it being part of the park system at no charge is a great thing and he would hate to lose that. Mr. White commented that he thinks the idea of the ice rink is great conceptually but noted that it is so small he feels it's almost worthless. It was noted that there are three indoor ice rinks at Braemar Ice Arena. Mr. White asked if anyone would like to make a motion that would provide preliminary approval and then come back with a final plan. Mr. Keprios explained that what he is looking for is approval in concept to basically turn Edinborough Park into a for fee facility for the areas that they are recommending and convert the skating rink into a play area. Mr. Keprios stated that he feels the most important thing is to see if the Park Board is in agreement because the concept is going to change the character of the park. Mr. White commented that if they are going to have to spend $130,000 to fix the ice rink and Zamboni and it would only cost $56,000 to put in a new play structure, why don't they just do that and save $60,000. They can decide later on if they want to do it for a fee. Ms. Kattreh commented that her one main concern is that it would draw in a lot more people which in turn will end up costing them more money because it will require more upkeep and maintenance for the park in general. Mr. Keprios added that if they are able to charge a fee it will also allow them better control of how many people they let into the park. Most importantly, however, is it gets it off the shoulders of the taxpayer in the long run. They need to make sure that the future of the park is going to be able to stay financially secure. Mr. Klus noted that he questions whether we are just putting on a band -aid by doing this now and it will just be something we will have to deal with a few years down the road. He stated that he can't see financially how it's going to work long range and therefore it's hard for him to support it. Mr. Klus indicated that he doesn't have a problem with getting rid of the ice rink; he just wants to make sure that fiscally we are doing the right thing for the future. Mr. Keprios commented that they are not 5 proposing this is a fix all for the future of the Edinborough Park. There are a lot of steps they will need to take to try to break even. Mr. Johnson suggested incorporating something into the pool at Edinborough. Mr. Shirley indicated that they have proposed getting an architect to take a look at the whole facility and try to come up with some different ideas that have not yet been explored. Mr. White asked so is it your plan after you see us to go to the council or is it your plan to come back with a proposal, get our approval and then go before the City Council. Mr. Keprios indicated that he would like to talk to Mr. Hughes to see if he feels this is the appropriate time to ask for the City Council's blessing in concept to move forward. If the answer is no, then there is no sense in coming up with a concrete plan. This needs to start with the Park Board to see if you are in favor of the concept. Mr. Keprios added that this is not a fix all but it certainly is a big step in the right direction. Ardis Wexler MOVED THAT WE VOTE IN FAVOR OF THE CONCEPT OF CHANGING EDINBOROUGH PARK INTO A FEE PRODUCING AREA AND WOULD ASK TO HAVE A MORE FLUSHED OUT PROPOSAL PERHAPS AT THE NEXT PARK BOARD MEETING OR MEETING AFTER. Karla Sitek SECONDED THE MOTION. Mr. White noted that the idea behind the motion is approve the idea of a user fee but come back with a more concrete proposal. In Favor — Ardis Wexler, Karla Sitek, Tom White, Jeff Johnson, Mike Damman, Allyson Grande Against — Andy Finsness, George Klus MOTION CARRIED. III. APPOINTMENT TO COMMUNITY EDUCATION SERVICES ADVISORY BOARD Mr. White stated that Ms. Presthus has informed him that she would be willing to serve on this board another year. Tom White MOVED TO NOMINATE THAT LINDA PRESTHUS SERVE ON THE COMMUNITY EDUCATION SERVICES ADVISORY BOARD. Karla Sitek SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Cl IV. PRESENTATION BY ED MACHOLDA, PARK AND RECREATION ASSISTANT DIRECTOR Ed MacHolda showed a Power Point presentation for the Park Board outlining his duties and areas of responsibilities in his position as Assistant Director for the Park and Recreation Department. After the presentation, Mr. Keprios commended Mr. MacHolda for doing an outstanding job with the Edina Aquatic Center, as well as, his other numerous duties. V. UPDATES A. Edina Aquatic Center Improvements — Mr. White asked if the Aquatic Center could put in an Icee machine to which Mr. MacHolda replied they are looking into getting some type of an Icee, smoothie, or soft serve machine. He noted that he thinks it would be a major hit. Mr. MacHolda indicated that they are working very hard to get the general contractor to complete the work at the Edina Aquatic Center. He stated that he thinks they were very good in getting the key things done before their June 7th opening. However, there are still a lot of things missing as well as items that need fixing. Most of these items did not affect the operation during the season but he would really like to see them get completed. Mr. Keprios pointed out that when Mr. MacHolda first started working for the City of Edina in 1985 the revenues at the pool were approximately $45,000 and it was losing money. Mr. MacHolda has since then turned it into a large revenue producer. He stated that it's a beautiful and well - designed facility and attributes that to Mr. MacHolda. Mr. Keprios also noted that Mr. MacHolda has spent a lot of nights and weekends away from his family because he insists on perfection at the facility. He commented that he is very proud of the job that Mr. MacHolda has done. Mr. White indicated that Mr. MacHolda has done a really good job and asked what his next project is at the pool. Mr. MacHolda replied that he would love to have water cannons along the west edge of the main pool. He noted that eventually he would like to convert the pool from an L shape to a U shape with a step entry at the far end with two feet of water. He indicated that he would also like to have spectator seating by the plunge pool. Mr. MacHolda also commented that he will be having a three- person tube for the flume ride, which seems to be a lot more popular and will move people through the line a lot quicker. Ms. Wexler asked if there would be some kind of over hang over the seating to which Mr. MacHolda yes, you can never have too much shade. He noted that he would love to have umbrellas all the way around the wading pool and would also like to have a trellis on at least one side of the main pool deck. B. Fox Meadow Park Development Project — Mr. Keprios indicated there have been some very generous individuals in the Fox Meadow neighborhood. They have raised 7 $40,700 and with $100,000 from the Developer's Fund that has been approved they now have $140,700 budgeted to get the job done. He noted that the architect is currently working on this to try to get some specifications together. C. Lewis Park - Mr. Klus asked Mr. Keprios for the status of Lewis Park. Mr. Keprios replied that it's still in a fragile state but it is their hope that they will start to sod the outlying areas by the end of next week. He added that even with all of the rain they have received, the area has amazingly stayed dry. D. Skate Park - Mr. Keprios indicated that they are scheduled to give another presentation to the Best Buy Corporation in October. They were told that a decision should be made by the end of October but they are definitely still in the running. E. Off -Leash Dog Park — Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that he met with the Park Director from the Minneapolis Park Board and her assistant and learned that their Public Works Department wants to put up 30 ft. high water holding tanks on that property. Therefore, they don't want to release it and allow the Minneapolis Park Board to use it as an off -leash dog park. Mr. Keprios commented that he hasn't given up on it yet. He noted that Edina's Engineering Department is going to find out if this really is a realistic plan and if so are they going to politically be able to do it. Mr. Klus asked how many dog parks there are in Minneapolis to which Mr. Keprios replied he believes there are currently three or four sites and added that they are very, very popular. F. Disc Golf Course - Mr. Keprios indicated that the disc golf course baskets have arrived and the Eagle Scout candidate, Paul Buck, and his recruits will start to put them into the ground on October 5th. The course should be playable by the end of the day on October 5th. Mr. White asked if they would have a grand opening with the professional disc golfer. Mr. Keprios replied that we would definitely do something. G. Teen Night — Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that they just held their first teen night at the Aquatic Center on August 23rd. He noted that it was sponsored by Edina Alarm (John Barnett's company) who donated $500.00 to the event as part of the Connecting With Kids initiative. Mr. MacHolda commented that it was a lot of fun and noted that there were approximately 250 to 300 kids who showed up throughout the evening. Mr. MacHolda indicated that Mr. Keprios, Ms. Tilsner, Ms. Miller, Susie MacHolda (Ed's wife) and Melanie Pusateri all volunteered their help with the event. He noted that there were three garage bands that provided live music entertainment and we served pizza and ice cream. He also noted that the main pool was open with the cable ride, water slide and diving board. It was overall a very positive experience. VI. OTHER A. Edina Theatre Company —Mr. Keprios indicated that the Edina Theatre Company is forming and noted that he met with them a few nights ago to help them start to get organized. He stated that they want to run their productions in the Grange Hall with their first production being held in November. Mr. Keprios commented that they could seat approximately 80 people in there. He explained that they will be putting on a three -actor play and it will be more of a theatre in the round type of setting. He noted that it's great to have a community theatre back in Edina. He stated that they would be hearing more about this. B. Fees and Charges — Mr. Keprios indicated that the fees and charges would be sent out in the next Park Board packet for preliminary review. He will be asking for their recommendations to the City Council at the November Park Board meeting. C. Art Center - Mr. Klus commented to Mr. Keprios that he was over the Art Center recently and noted that they have done a phenomenal job of cleaning up around the walkways and the back yard area by the kilns. He noted that the neighbors are very pleased. D. Vandalism — Mr. Johnson asked what the status has been with any vandalism. Mr. Keprios replied that recently they have had some vandalism at Centennial Lakes. Also, they have recently had some vandalism at the Cornelia School shelter building. There was another episode of vandalism at Arden Park and fortunately the police caught the kids that did the vandalism. E. Iron Kids Triathlon - Mr. Keprios indicated that they recently hosted the Iron -Kids Triathlon at the Aquatic Center and it was very successful. He added that Mr. MacHolda again donated another one of his days. Mr. MacHolda pointed out that their numbers were way up with over 200 participants, which is the largest increase at any of their sites from one year to the next. F. Braemar Police and Fire Facility — Mr. White asked what the status is with the Braemar Police and Fire facility. He also asked what has happened to the stated promise that the public will be able to get in and use it. Mr. Keprios responded that he would find out the answers to those questions and report back at the next Park Board meeting. VII. ADJOURNMENT George Klus MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 8:15 P.M. Mike Damman SECONDED THE MOTION. MEETING ADJOURNED. W Um MINKH4 U11 RSSOCIWH October 1, 2002 Officers Mr. Keprios, Park and Recreation Director President City of Edina St. Cal Simmons 4801 W. 50`x' Interlaeben awntry Club Edina; MN 55424 First Vice President Dear Mr. Keprios: Rick Soskin Oak Re2ge Country Chd� On behalf of the Minnesota Golf Association, I want to thank you, the City Council, Secretary-Treasurer and the entire membership at Braemar Golf Course for hosting the 42nd Minnesota Jerry Clark State Junior Team Championship. The tournament was a great success, much in Intertakrn Gol(Cbtb part to the tremendous hospitality everyone at Braemar showed toward the players Past President and our staff. Dick Bennett Gnanbaeen GtyrfCi „h I also want to commend the efforts of the staff– John Valliere, Joe Greupner, John Nylund and Amy Smith. All of them were so enjoyable and easy to work with when Regional Vice Presidents making the arrangements. And, each of their respective staffs did everything to make the tournament a success. It is so much easier to conduct an event such as the Metro Red Magnuson - 3tatb-!umorT-!UT-s- committed to it success! Keller Golf Club Northeast Tim Higgins Pokeganza Golf 67uroe Northwest Donald Johnson Meadoov Golf Cowve Southeast Bill Fierke Owatonna Country Cluh Southwest Mark Loosbrock [Flartbingron Country Club Staff Executive Director Chief Operating Officer Tom Ryan Thank you.for your past and continued support of the Minnesota Golf Association. We sincerely look forward to having events at Braemar in the future! Sincerely, Dan Raymond MGA Junior Golf Manager CC: John Valliere Joe Greupner John Nylund Amy Smith 6550 York Avenue Soutb Suite 211 Edina, Matneeota 55955 -2353 Pbone: 952.927.4643 F,=:952-9279642 www.mngolf.org SERVING THE GAME FORALL GOLFERS IN MINNESOTA i 07 1 October 3, 2002 Winston G. Lawer New Idea's Merchandising Company 4101 West 98`h Street 3`a Floor Suite #320 Bloomington, MN 55437 Dear Mr. Lawer, Thank you for visiting with me in my- office on Tuesday this week. You stated a strong interest in purchasing a portion of Braemar parkland to build a house for your family. The property that you pointed out as your first choice is at the intersection of Gleason Road and Tanglewood Court. Your second choice would be to purchase the wedge shaped parcel that is at the end of Tanglewood Court. Both parcels of land are currently part of Braemar Park, which was purchased by the City of Edina back in the 1950's. In follow up to our conversation, please know that I have shared your request to purchase park property with Gordon Hughes, City Manager, and Craig Larsen, City Planner. They also - confirmed what I had .shared with you earlier that the City of Edina has a standing policy that we will not sell any existing parkland: Unless the City Council has a different view today, the property is not available for sale. If you wish to further pursue the matter, I respectfully suggest that you submit your request in writing to Dennis Maetzold, Mayor, and members of the Edina City Council. You can mail -it to the address on this letterhead. If you have any further questions for me, don't hesitate to call me at 826 -0430. Many thanks. cer y, Vohn�keprio rirector Edina Park and Recreation Department Cc: Dennis Maetzold, Mayor Gordon Hughes, City Manager Craig Larsen, City Planner (952) 927 -8861 City Hall FAX (952) 826 -03 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (952) 826 -03779 9 LMC Phone: (651) 281 -1200 (800) 925 -1122 League of Minnesota Cities Fax: (651) 281 -1299 TDD (651) 281 -1290 Cites promoting exceffenoe Web Site: www.Imnc.org Date: September 30, 2002 To: Mayors and City Managers /Administrators From: Jim Miller, Executive Director Re: State budget deficit action kit Volatility in the state's budget during the past year has translated into uncertainty for local budgets. Although the magnitude of the state budget deficit will not be officially revised until late November or early December, the Commissioner of Finance has recently suggested that the deficit could be as high as $2.7 billion for the 2004 -2005 biennium. With the additional pessimistic economic news that has been released over the past several weeks, this fall's budget forecast could even exceed the Commissioner's gloomy figures. During recent weeks, the League has received numerous inquiries from member cities seeking advice on how to prepare for the uncertain state budget situation and the potential for state aid reductions. To help member city officials prepare, I sent a memo in August that outlined issues surrounding the state budget. That memo drew upon conversations League staff had with key state decision makers and information available at the time. The purpose of the information before you today is to provide a framework for discussing with legislative candidates, residents and the media -the impact of the state budget deficit on your city. League staff created tools to help you discuss issues surrounding the state budget. In this packet you'll find: • State Budget Talking Points — This handy reference tool breaks the issues of the state budget deficit and it's impacts into simple key statements. In addition, it includes sections called "Next Steps" that will help prepare your city council for manners in which to integrate your message into the discussion. • State Budget Talking Point Box — This "message box" format is designed to illustrate that no one message on the projected deficit is more important than another, rather, they are all interconnected. Post this reference tool on your bulletin board to help you respond quickly to inquiries. On the back of the "message box" you will find an area in which you can jot down the way your city is dealing with the potential impacts and more. The idea is to help you organize your city's key messages. ❑ State Budget Letter to the Editor — You'll also find a sample letter to the editor you can customize and send to a local paper or legislator. The goal of the letter is to let your audiences — whether legislative candidates, legislators, the media or residents — know what the projected state budget deficit could mean to your community. ❑ Op -Ed Piece by Board President — Lastly, please find a guest editorial by LMC Board President Michael McCauley on the difficulty member cities face in setting budgets this year. It was written to demonstrate the diligence and efforts of cities on behalf of their residents. This piece has been distributed to the print media in Minnesota and is included for your information. If you have questions about these tools or the manners in which to implement them, please contact Tom Bullington, LMC Communications Manager, at 651.281.1243. 145 University Avenue West • St. Paul, MN 55103 -2044 • (651) 281 -1200 • (800) 925 -1122 • www.imnc.org t a Phone: (651) 281 -1200 .(800) 925 -1122 _M_C L / — Fax: (651) 281 -1299 TDD (651) 281 -1290 League of Minnesota Cities Web Site: www.lrnnc.org Cities promoting eseel%nce State Budget Talking Points State deficit may reach $2.7 billion The state may face a budget deficit of as much as $2.7 billion during the 2004 -05 biennium, according to recent statements by the Minnesota Commissioner of Finance. State agencies are being asked to prepare preliminary budget proposals at a 90 percent funding level. This 10 percent planning reduction reflects the approximate across - the -board cut necessary in state spending to address the projected deficit. Minnesota cities could lose $59 -75 million in local aids A 10 percent cut to general city aid programs would translate to a loss of between $59 -75 million in local government aid. LGA is used to pay for services such as police and fire departments, libraries and snow removal. LGA also is used for unfunded mandates by the state and federal governments such as water quality standards and state - determined public pension fund contributions. There is an outside chance that LGA payments due for distribution this December and reimbursements of $10 -15 million for market value homestead credit (MVHC) could be cut if the December forecast shows a state deficit in excess of the state's $300 million rainy -day fund, and if the Governor decides to address the deficit through unallotment. ( "Unallotment" allows the Governor to reduce legislative appropriations to address a deficit in excess of reserves.) Next steps 1. Discuss the proactive steps your city already has, taken to deal with the potential impacts of the state budget. 2. Discuss the impacts of cuts on your city and give real -life examples of what those cuts could mean. In addition, talk about the value of city services and their actual costs. 3. Explain the portion of property taxes used to provide city services and how the balance of property tax funds are used. Legislators tapped simple solutions Last fall, the state announced a $2 billion deficit for the remainder of the 2002 -03 biennium. During February that projection increased to $2.5 billion, and today is projected at $2.7 billion for the 2004- 05 biennium. -- MORE -- 145 University Avenue West • St. Paul, MN 55103 -2044 • (651) 281 -1200 • (800) 925 -1122 • www.Imnc.org Legislators during 2002 addressed the deficit by tapping apparent options such as the state reserves and the elimination of automatic inflation assumptions, eliminating the tax increment financing grant pool, delaying school aid payments and cutting some agency budgets. Options cities can consider include increasing the property tax levy to cover, or at least partially offset, the potential shortfall. Cities also can consider revenue enhancements where appropriate; development of a plan to reduce appropriations or delay future financial obligations; and drawing down reserves to cover state aid losses. Next steps Discuss budget options your city is or has considered and explain the reasons behind your decisions. 2. Share information with residents through city publications, and with the media. 3. Encourage citizens to participate in the process and to build their knowledge. Timing — Cities must set budgets before the state budget deficit -is -truly known The budget forecast for the 2004 -05 biennium will not be finalized until December. But cities must deal with their budgets now. In particular, cities must set preliminary property tax levies during September, meaning cities essentially must guess what might or might not happen at the state level and try to determine the impact at the local level two months before the final budget forecast is released. Contacts Gary Carlson, Director of Intergovernmental Relations, gcarlson @lmnc.org, (651) 281 -1255 Stephanie Lake, Marketing Communications Coordinator, slake @lmnc.org, (651) 215 -4031 145 University Avenue West • St. Paul, MN 55103 -2044 • (651) 281 -1200 • (800) 925 -1122 • www.Imnc.org Cities could lose $59 -75 million in local aids • A 10 percent cut to general city aid programs equals cuts of $59- 75 million in local aids. • LGA pays for services such as police and fire departments, libraries, snow removal, and unfunded mandates by the state and federal governments such as water quality standards and state - determined public pension fund contributions. • December LGA payments and market value homestead credit reimbursements may be cut. State deficit may reach $2.7 billion • State budget deficit may reach $2.7 billion for 2004 -05 biennium. • State agencies are preparing budget proposals at a 90 percent funding level. • This 10 percent planning reduction reflects the approximate across -the- board cut necessary in state spending to address the projected deficit. State Budget Talking Points 0. Legislators tapped simple solutions during 2002 • Simple solutions tapped include drawing down state reserves, eliminating automatic inflation assumptions and tax increment financing grant pool, delaying school aid payments and cutting some agency budgets. • Options available to cities aren't easy. Cities can increase property tax levy to offset potential shortfalls; consider revenue enhancements; develop a plan to reduce appropriations or delay future financial obligations; draw down reserves to cover state aid losses. Cities must set budgets before deficit is known • The budget forecast will not be finalized until December. • But cities must deal with their budgets now. • Cities must set preliminary property tax levies during September — that means city officials essentially must guess what might or might not happen at the state level and try to determine the impact before the release of the final state budget forecast. Next Steps - State Budget Talking Points LTs.e this. side ofthe:StateBudgef Talking Parritsto outline some tithe tbYgs your cify already has done to address th_e ttnpact of the state budget shortfalLti your Proactive Steps Discuss proactive steps your city has taken to deal with potential impacts of the state budget. 1. 1 2. 1 3. 1 4. State Budget Impacts Discuss impacts of cuts on your city and give real -life examples of what the cuts could mean; and the value of city services and their actual costs. 1. 1 2. 1 3. 1 4. Property Tax Explain the portion of property taxes used to provide city services and how the balance of property tax funds are used. 1. 2. 1 3. 1 4. City Budget Options Discuss budget options your city is or has considered and explain the reasons behind your decisions. (Share information with residents through city publications, and with the media.) 1. 1 2. 1 3. 1 4. LilqC Phone: (651) 281 -1200 (800) 925 -1122 League of Minnesota Cities Fax: (651) 281 -1299 TDD (651) 281 -1290 Cities promoting exce�%nce � Web Site: www.lmnc.org Issue: State Budget Sample Letter to the Editor (Phis piece can be used as is or tailored even more, according to the needs of your city.) Date Editor's Name Name of Pa per Address City, State, Zip Code Dear [name], Cities across the state are in the midst of preparing budgets for the upcoming year. Just as with city officials in each of Minnesota's 854 cities, our city council is struggling to craft a budget that provides police, fire and other important municipal services. This struggle comes due to a weakened Minnesota economy and a resulting state budget deficit that has a real possibility of trickling down to impact our own local services. In Minnesota, local government services are financed through a locally determined property tax and sales and income tax revenues. The funds are collected by the state and distributed to cities, counties and school districts to help finance our schools, our police and fire services and [name a county service hereJ. This partnership has worked well and has helped provide quality city services without excessive levels of property taxes. [Optional Paragraph] The state has informed the City of [name] that it will receive $ , in state aid during the coming year to help finance our operations. That is about percent of our total annual local budget. [End Optional Paragraph] Now, with a significant state deficit looming, our city council, and those across the state, could be affected by the Minnesota Legislature's response to this difficult challenge. The Legislature undoubtedly must make difficult decisions about balancing the state budget, possibly including raising taxes or cutting services. In addition, aids to cities could be cut. Clearly, none of these choices will be easy. The city is now finalizing its budget for next year. Unfortunately, we will have to adopt our budget long before the Legislature finalizes the state budget. Yet state budget decisions could impact our city budget, as well as city services, if legislators opt to reduce the $ that the City of [name] already was told to expect. As we complete work on the city budget, we want to ask for your input and your understanding about the difficult planning decisions ahead. Please stop by a council meeting to share your ideas, concerns and views. The council meets [date, time and location of council meeting]. Our city's future and the decisions we make are up to all of us. Together, we can ensure we continue to enjoy the quality of life the City of [name] has to offer. Sincerely, [Name] [Title) 145 University Avenue West • St. Paul, MN 55103 -2044 • (651) 281 -1200 • (800) 925 -1122 • www.imnc.org L-M-C- L-W" of Minnesota Cities Cities promoting e=enence Phone: (651) 281 -1200 (800) 925 -1122 Fax: (651) 281 -1299 TDD (651) 281 -1290 Web Site: www.hnnc.org FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT: Stephanie Lake DATE: Sept. 30, 2002 Communications Coordinator WORD COUNT: 540 PHONE: 651.215.4031 Guest Commentary Projected state budget deficit spells uncertainty, difficult planning for cities By Michael McCauley President, League ofMinnesota Cities City councils throughout Minnesota — including yours — were faced during the week of September 16 with the difficult task of making budget decisions that will impact city operations for the next 12 months. They are making these decisions at a time of great uncertainty and with a looming state budget deficit currently projected as high as $2.7 billion. While legislative and gubernatorial candidates can wait to address the deficit until the next budget forecast is released during December and until the start of the 2003 legislative session, your city council was required by law to specify by September 16 the maximum property tax levy for the next city budget year which starts January 1. These decisions are never easy, and this year the decisions are more difficult due to factors over which city councils have little control. The Legislature may respond to the state budget deficit by reducing intergovernmental revenues shared with cities. Larger cities are hampered by a state - determined cap on property tax levies. Cities also face budget pressures from escalating health care costs and new responsibilities in the area of homeland security. During a typical year, your city leaders must make informed guesses about the needs of your community for the next 12 months. Plans for road improvements, sewer upgrades and park renovations must be carefully planned far in advance. Decisions about hiring a police officer or firefighter must be decided months before the budget is implemented. These decisions vary from community to community and hinge upon locally identified needs and issues. City councils must be mindful and diligent in all their assessments, because cities' largest source of revenue — the -- MORE -- 145 University Avenue West • St. Paul, MN 55103 -2044 • (651) 281 -1200 • (800) 925 -1122 • www.Imnc.org tr1A. ow Le I< —N iReea ' REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item From: GORDON L. HUGHES Consent ❑ CITY MANAGER Information Only Date: OCTOBER 15, 2002 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: CITY OF EDINA INVESTMENT El Motion POLICY El Resolution ❑ Ordinance El Discussion REPORT: At the October 1, 2002, meeting, the City Council inquired about the status of the City of Edina investments. Attached is a copy of the City of Edina Statement of Investment Policy that was adopted in 1995. This Investment Policy continues to guide the investment decisions of the City. Investments of the City are overseen by an Investment Advisory Committee comprising, the City Manager, Assistant City Manager, Finance Director and Assistant Finance Director. This Committee meets on a quarterly basis for the purpose of reviewing the investment activity of the City, reviewing performance and determining compliance of investments with City policy. The Investment Advisory Committee also reviews the profit and loss statements of the City's enterprise funds and the status of General Fund expenditures and revenues. If the City Council desires more information concerning City investments, we will be glad to schedule a formal presentation at a forthcoming. Council agenda. 4. CITY OF EDINA DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY 1. POLICY It is the policy of the City to invest public funds in a manner which maximizes return and provides maximum security in preserving and protecting funds while meeting the daily cash flow demands and conforming to all applicable federal, state and/or local statutes governing the investment of public funds. - 2. SCOPE This investment policy applies to all financial assets of the City of Edina and Housing Redevelopment Authority ( "the City ") except those (if any) which are governed in another manner by specific reference in federal, state and/or local statutes. All assets to which this policy applies are accounted for the City's comprehensive annual financial report and include: General Fund Special Revenue Funds Debt Service Funds Capital Project Funds Enterprise Funds Trust and Agency Funds Internal Service Funds Any other newly created fund. 3. STANDARDS The Finance Director is responsible for 'implementing these policies. The standard of prudence to be used shall be the "Prudent Investor Rule," and will be applied in the context of managing an overall portfolio: "investments shall be made with judgement and care - under circumstances then prevailing - which persons of prudence, discretion and intelligence exercise in the management of their own affairs, not for speculation, but for investment, considering the probable safety of their capital as well as the probable income to be derived." City employees meeting this standard will be relieved of personal responsibility for an individual security's credit risk or market price changes, provided deviations from expectations are reported in a timely fashion and appropriate action is taken to control adverse developments. a . The Finance Director and the investment committee shall not knowingly engage in any personal business activities which could impair their ability to make impartial investment decisions. Bonding of the Finance Director shall be required. The City Manager will establish specific bonding levels. 4. AUTHORIZED INVESTMENTS Investment instruments authorized and permitted by this policy are as follows: A. Obligations of the United States or its agencies under a repurchase agreement if the margin agreement under the repurchase agreement is 101 percent and with any of the following institutions: 1) a bank qualified as depository of public funds, 2) any national or state bank in the United States which is a member of the Federal Reserve System and whose combined capital and surplus equals or exceeds $10,000,000, 3) a primary reporting dealer in United States government securities to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 4) a securities broker - dealer having its principal executive office in Minnesota, licensed pursuant to chapter 80A, or an affiliate of it, regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission and maintaining a combined capital and surplus of $40,000,000 or more, exclusive of subordinated debt. B. Governmental bonds, notes, bills, mortgages, and other securities, which are direct obligations or are guaranteed or insured issues of the United States, its agencies, its instrumentalities, or organizations created by an act of Congress, excluding mortgage- backed securities defined as "high risk "(as defined below) or in certificates of deposit secured by letters of credit issued by federal Home Loan Banks. High risk mortgage- backed securities are as follows: 1) interest -only or principal -only mortgage- backed securities, 2) any mortgage derivative security that: a) has an expected average life greater than ten years, b) has an expected average life that: i) will extend by more than four years as the result of an immediate and sustained parallel shift in the yield curve of plus 300 basis points: or ii) will shorten by more than six years as the result of an immediate and sustained parallel shift in the yield curve of minus 300 basis points: or c) will have an estimated change in price of more than 17 percent, as the result of an immediate and sustained parallel shift in the yield curve of plus or minus 300 basis points. C. Shares of an investment company registered under the Federal Investment Company Act of 1940, whose shares are registered under the Federal Securities Act of 1933, and whose only investments are in: 1) securities described in B. above, (with the exception that "high- risk" mortgage- backed securities are permissible investments for an investment company), 2) general obligation tax- exempt securities rated A or better by a national bond rating service, and 3) repurchase or reverse repurchase agreements fully collateralized by securities described above if the agreements are only entered into with an entity which is: a) a primary reporting dealer to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, or b) one of the 100 largest U.S. commercial banks. D. State and local government obligation as follows: 1) an obligation of the State of Minnesota or any of its municipalities, 2) obligation of other state and local governments: a) that have taxing power, and b) are rated A or better by a national bond rating service. 3) general obligations of the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency that are rated A or better by a national rating agency, 4) general obligations of housing finance agencies of other states, provided: a) they include a moral obligation of the state, and b) they are rated A or better by a national bond rating service, 5) general or revenue obligation of any agency or authority of the State of Minnesota other than those found in 3 or 4 above (Housing Finance Agency) that are rated AA or better by a national bond rating service. E. Bankers acceptances of United States banks eligible for purchase by the Federal Reserve System. F. Commercial paper issued by United States corporations or their Canadian subsidiaries that is rated Al by Moody's Investors Service and/or P1 by Standard and Poor's Corporation and matures in 270 days or less. G. Guaranteed investment contract (gic) issued or guaranteed by a United States commercial bank or domestic branch of a foreign bank or a United States insurance company or its Canadian or United States subsidiary provided it ranks on a parity L 1 with the senior unsecured debt obligations of the issuer or guarantor, and 1) if it is a long -term gic, either: a) the long -term senior unsecured debt of the issuer or guarantor is rated, or obligations backed by letters of credit of the issuer or guarantor if forming the primary basis of a rating of such obligations would be rated, in the highest or next highest rating category of Standard & Poor's corporation, Moody's Investors Service, Inc., or a similar nationally recognized rating agency, or b) if the issuer is a bank with headquarters in Minnesota, the long -term senior unsecured debt of the issuer is rated, or obligations backed by letters of credit of the issuer if forming the primary basis of a rating of such obligations would be rated in one of the three highest rating categories of Standard & Poor's Corporation, Moody's Investor Service, Inc., or a similar nationally recognized rating agency. 2) if it is a short-term gic, the short-term unsecured debt of the issuer or guarantor is rated, or obligations backed by letters of credit of the issuer or guarantor if forming the primary basis of a rating of such obligations would be rated, in the highest two rating categories of Standard & Poor's Corporation, Moody's Investors Service, Inc., or similar nationally recognized rating agency. H. Certificates of deposit at state and federally chartered banks and savings and loan associations. All investments made under this subsection shall be limited to the amount of Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation or shall be secured in the manner set forth in Minnesota statute 118.005. The certificate of deposit should be in the form of a discounted security maturing in the amount not to exceed the insurance coverage or in the amount so that at any time the face amount together with any accrued interest does not exceed the insurance coverage. 5. SAFEKEEPING AND CUSTODY Investments may be held in safekeeping with: A. Any Federal Reserve Bank, B. any bank authorized under the laws of the United States or any state to exercise corporate trust powers, including but not limited to the bank from which the investment is purchased, C. a primary reporting dealer in United States government securities to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, or D. A securities broker - dealer having its principal executive office in Minnesota, licensed pursuant to chapter 80A, or an affiliate of it, regulated by the securities and exchange commission and maintaining a combined capital and surplus of $40,000,000 or more, exclusive of subordinated debt. f' r The City's ownership of all securities in which the fund is invested should be evidenced by written acknowledgments identifying the securities by: A. the names of the issuers, B. the maturity dates, C. the interest rates, D. any serial numbers or other distinguishing marks. 6. SECURITY DEALERS, INSTITUTIONS, AND CONSULTANTS The Finance Director shall maintain a list of security dealers and financial institutions authorized to provide investment services to the City of Edina. The Finance Director shall develop appropriate criteria, when necessary, for the further evaluation and selection of specific broker - dealers, institutions, consultants and/or external money managers. Prudence, rating services, analysis of current financial statement, key ratios and other statistical data compilation and /or specific other knowledge are expected to be utilized as components of the evaluation and selection criteria. A current financial statement of each broker - dealer, institution, consultant and/or external money manager which the City is using in execution of this policy must be kept on file by the Finance Director. Prior to completing an initial transaction with a broker - .dealer, the Finance Director shall provide to the broker - dealer a written statement of investment restrictions which shall include a provision that all future investments are to be made in accordance with Minnesota Statutes governing the investment of public funds as well as this statement of investment policy. The broker - dealer must acknowledge receipt of the statement of investment restrictions in writing and agree to handle the municipality's account in accordance with these restrictions. The City may not enter into a transaction with a broker until the broker has provided this written agreement to the City. A. Qualified broker - dealers will be those security broker - dealers who maintain an office in the state and who are selected according to credit worthiness and approved by the Finance Director and the investment advisory committee. Only broker - dealers who are recognized as "primary dealers" by the Market Reports Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and/or regional dealers that qualify under Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 150 -1 (uniform net capital rule) may be used for City investments placement. B. Qualified institutions will be those banks, savings banks and saving and loans institutions which are generally recognized by applicable federal, state and local statutes as being authorized to receive investments from the City. Approved institutions will be those named generally above, who also meet further selection criteria developed by the city. Approval is to be determined jointly by the Finance Director and the investment advisory committee. C. External consultants may be engaged and used when necessary and prudent to further and/or enhance the execution of this policy. A consultant is defined for the purposes of this policy as being an individual or firm having expertise relative to execution of this policy who may be engaged to serve in an advisory role t% without the purpose of receiving investment deposits from the City for the further purpose of generating a return on the placement. Approval of a consultant must be given jointly by the Finance Director and the investment advisory committee. No funds are to be place directly with a consultant. D. External money managers may be engaged and used in the execution of this policy so long as the external money manager(s) is limited to investment activities with the confines of this policy. An external money manager must maintain appropriate diversification as noted later in this policy. Any external money manager engaged by the City will be required to provide an accounting and performance report to the Finance Director at a frequency not less than quarterly. External money managers must be approved by the Finance Director and the investment advisory committee. 7. INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES The preservation of principal shall be the paramount objective of the investment program of the City of Edina. Investments shall be selected in a manner that will attempt to ensure the safety of the City's capital. This will be accomplished through a program of diversification and maturity limitations for each individual pool or fund of investments. These limitations will be determined by the Finance Director and the investment advisory committee and will be kept on file with the Finance Director. Proceeds from the issuance of tax - exempt debt securities shall be invested, recorded and reported in the manner set forth by the U.S. Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service so as to preserve the tax- exempt status of the debt securities. 8. QUARTERLY REVIEW This investment policy, the schedule of diversification and maturity limitations by pool or group of investable funds, authorized broker - dealers, authorized investments and all other aspects of these investment policies . will be reviewed on a quarterly basis. The Finance Director shall prepare by the 20th of the month following the end of each calendar quarter, a report of investments held, investment activity and projected portfolio investment returns. The Finance Director and the investment advisory committee made up of the City Manager, Assistant City Manager, and the Assistant Finance Director, will review the information and make any proposed modifications. The scheduled quarterly process shall not inhibit desirable modifications to the policy at other times during the year. INVPOL /7/21/95 144 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 273 Regular Meeting, October 15, 2002, 7:00 P.M. Room 349, Edina Community Center AGENDA Determination of Quorum and Call to Order Approval of Minutes of Meeting of September 23, 2002 PRESENTATION — Parents United Campaign — Tom Whitney REPORT — K -12 Curriculum Review — Dr. Jenni Norlin- Weaver, Lonnie Skrentner, Beth Potter, Cathryn Weller ACTION Page 92 Personnel Recommendations 145 -148 93 Expenditures Payable October 15, 2002, appended 149 94 Structural Agreement, appended 150 95 Master Agreement — Independent School District 273 and the Edina 151 Professional Association of Support Staff, appended 96 Pay Rates for Elementary Playground and Lunchroom Supervisors and 152 Crossing Guards 97 Federal Grants for Fiscal Year 2003 -2004 153 -155. 98 Facilities Study Consultants 156-160, 99 Student Teaching Agreement with Bethel College 161 -164 100 Edina Public Schools Garage Sale 165 101 Employee Medical /Hospitalization Insurance 166 CONSENT 102 Community Education Services Personnel Recommendations 167 103 Withdrawal of Conditional Job Offer 168 104 Agreement to Accept Request to Resign 169 -170 105 Commendation of Edina Public Schools Communications Department 171 106 Gift from Thomas Rock and Melissa Raphan 172 107 Gift from Ernest and Mary Harper. 173 108 Gift from UnumProvident Corporation 174 109 Gift from Target Corporation Community Relations 175 INFORMATION 110 'Recognition of Staff 176 Adjournment *Persons who wish to address the Board are requested to complete and submit an appropriate form to the Board Secretary prior to the designated hearing time. When recognized, each individual shall identify himself /herself and the group represented, if any. He /She shall then state the reason for addressing the Board and shall be limited in time at the discretion of the Board chair. Individual employees of the School District or representatives of employee organizations shall have utilized administrative procedures before making a request to address the Board. Jon & Jody Foust 6508 Indian Hills Road Edina, MN 55439 October 7, 2002 City of Edina Building Inspections 4801 West 50`h Street Edina, MN 55424 To Whom it May Concern, OCT 9 2002 We are writing this letter for the benefit of Greg Bomsta. We are currently undergoing an extensive remodeling of our home at 6508 Indian Hills Road with Kuhl Designers and Builders. Greg's considerable professionalism, thoroughness and timeliness have enabled our project to continue with no delays. We are so pleased to be new residents of the City of Edina and have been impressed with the community and City offices, thus far. It has been a true pleasure working with Greg on this project. Our Sincerank Y Jon pfd Jody r DiciEST September, 2002 A digest of actions taken by the Metropolitan Council, Metropolitan Airports Commission, Metropolitan Parks & Open Space Commission and Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission. Minutes of all Council and Commission meetings are filed with the Legislative Reference Library, 645 State Office Building, 6th Floor, in St. Paul for a period of up to two years and can be viewed by the public. Call the appropriate commission or operations area for meeting information and/or specific questions. Metropolitan Council The Metropolitan Council is located at Mears Park Centre, 230 E. Fifth St., St. Paul, MN, 55101. For further information regarding the contents of this publication, contact Sandra Lindstrom at (651) 602 -1390. The Council's general number is (651) 602 -1000, TDD: (651) 291 -0904. Call the Metro Information Line at (651) 602 -1888 for recorded information about upcoming Council meetings and regional events, current job openings and Section 8 housing information. Recent Council publications can be found at major public libraries in the Metro Area. Publications can be ordered by a -mail. The address is: data.center@ajnetc.state.mn.us Comments can be made to that address as well as (651) 602 -1500, the Metro Council Public Comment Line. Check the internet web site at http: / /Www.metrocouncil.org. The Council... Environment authorized staff to negotiate and execute an agreement with the city of Woodbury for cost sharing on the South Washington County Interceptor. -- authorized staff to award a targeted grant of $250,000 to the Friends of the Mississippi River to manage Vermillion River streambank restoration and wetland restoration on Council property near the Empire wastewater treatment plant. This is the second round of 2002 targeted grants under the 1998 Memorandum of Understanding between the Metropolitan Council and the Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy. authorized its Regional Administrator to execute an amendment to the engineering services contract with Howard R. Green Company in the amount not to exceed $250,000 for additional design and services for the Empire Wastewater Treatment Plant Outfall. • increased the delegated change order authority of the General Manager of Environmental Services for the Metropolitan Wastewater Treatment Plant Secondary Treatment Improvements Project — - Phase II, MCES Project No. 970650, by $263,000. • ratified a Justification for and declaration of emergency for repair of the Little Canada Interceptor (81 -51). • authorized its Regional Administrator to negotiate and execute the Intergovernmental Agreement with the city of Minneapolis, MCES Project 800400. Livable Communities • reviewed a proposal to do an Elko/New Market Center and Service Area Land Use Study and took the following actions: approved a $75,000 planning grant from Livable Communities Act (LCA) Promotion funds to Scott County to prepare 2030 Comprehensive Plan Updates for the cities of Elko, New Market and New Market Township that 1 7 TT7.RO 11 C"PTIT/ -M E A\� DiEiE are based on the draft policies of the Blueprint 2030; and 2. agreed to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding as to the conditions for the planning grant with Scott County, Elko and New Market that includes the deliverables of: a. 2030 Comprehensive Plan Updates for Elko, New Market and New Market Township based on the draft policies of the Blueprint 2030; b. the study components as identified in the Study Outline Framework; c. Livable Communities Act participation by Elko and New Market and associated agreements for housing goals; and d. minimum expectations for the Comprehensive Plan Updates for Elko and New Market as presented. • reviewed the allocation of Livable Communities Account Interest Earnings and took the following actions: 1. approved the allocation of Livable Communities interest earnings for calendar years 2002 and 2003 to: a. $200,000 to the General Fund for marketing and management of the program, as approved in the Council's adopted operating budget; b. $150,000 (approximately 20 %) for a new Council initiative intended to attract non -LCA communities into the program as members promoting Livable Communities principles in small communities anticipating growth; c. $200,000 for technical assistance funding to local LCA communities for comprehensive planning initiatives that implement Blueprint 2030 principles; and d. balances to funds in proportion to cash balances; 2. directed staff to develop criteria as to how to make these allocations; and 3. agreed to review this allocation program following the legislative session. • approved the 2002 TEA -21 Affordable Housing Enhancement Demonstration (AHED) solicitation for immediate distribution. authorized a $100,000 grant from the Planning Assistance Grant or Loan Fund for the I -35W Corridor Coalition; and authorized the use of $100,000 of interest earned on Livable Communities fund balances to make this planning assistance grant. • reviewed the city of Eagan's Comprehensive Plan Amendments and adopted the Executive Summary and Review Record with the following recommendations: 1. The city may put the following comprehensive plan amendments into effect: a. Blue Cross Blue Shield Special Area #7; b. Greyhawk Townhomes, reguiding 3.3 acres from Retail Commercial (RC) to Medium - Density Residential (MDR); Page 2 September 2002 0 D EST ME�\T I(i c. Eagan Heights Townhomes b. identifying in its housing 3`d Addition, reguiding 5.21 implementation element acres from RC to MDR; and various tools, strategies and partnerships the city can use d. 2010 and 2020 household to meet its housing goals, forecasts. including, but not limited to' TIF, Dakota County CDA, 2. The Council continues to apply and other state and federal its alignment policy, as adopted resources. by the Council in December 2000, as part of the review of 5. The city clarify its plan with the city's guide plan update, regards to identification of and until the city either: (1) meets application of policies for the the city's housing goals; or, (2) one -mile buffer around Noise amends its plan to guide Zone 4. The city incorporate sufficient land for MDR and notification of homeowners HDR and /or increase its concerning future aircraft noise planned densities to meet the from the new runway at MSP city's housing goals. into the Eagan Heights plan amendment. 3. The city prepare and submit for Council review the land use 6. The city work with the plans for the Central Area developer of the BCBS site to - - Special -Area #4 and Cedar- - reduce -`the amount-of trees - Grove Redevelopment Special removed by using structured Area #5 as promptly as parking or alternative forms of reasonable. transportation or undertake other mitigation measures. 4. The city amend its Comprehensive Plan to be 7. The city work with overlapping consistent with Council housing jurisdictions and agencies in policies by: developing a mitigation plan to ensure the protection of nearby a. guiding sufficient land for natural features including the Medium- and High - Density Minnesota River Valley, trout Residential development streams, and Nichols Meadow and /or increasing densities Fen. that reflect current development trends within • approved the Public Agency Housing Plan the city for Medium- and for 2003; authorized its Regional High- Density Residential Administrator to execute the required land use categories to certifications; and directed staff to submit accommodate the Council's the final plan to the U.S. Department of forecasts and the city's Housing and Urban Development as housing goals. required. Page 3 September 2002 m I'T'RO DICiEST g!!!, J E A, \ Management • authorized its Regional Administrator to execute an amendment to the Qwest Corporation LAN Switching Service Agreement increasing the total authorization amount from $290,000 to $375,680 plus tax. • authorized its Regional Administrator to execute an extension of the commercial general liability policy with the State of Minnesota Risk Management Fund through July 1, 2003. amended the Council's Financial Management and Budget Procedures (Section 3 -1a) as reflected in the attached procedure authorizing the Regional Administrator to transfer capital program authority between capital projects in an amount not to exceed the lesser of $500,000 or 10 percent of the capital project authorization being increased. • authorized its Regional Administrator to award $287,207.50 to the 02006 Gainsharing Project Team members. • authorized the Chief Financial Officer to negotiate a new loan agreement for wastewater projects with the Minnesota Public Facilities Authority (PFA) for up to $100 million. • adopted a resolution granting approval of the Metropolitan Radio Board's Draft 2003 Budget. • approved a resolution granting approval of the proposed year 2003 Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission Budget and Report on User Fee Charges. • authorized its Regional Administrator to enter into an inter - agency agreement with the Metropolitan Radio Board providing for specific Council administrative Support Services. Regional Growth Policy reviewed the city of Lake Elmo's Comprehensive Plan Update and adopted the revised Executive Summary dated September 5, 2002, its findings and conclusions, the June 3, 2002, staff report and the August 6, 2002, supplemental staff report, and agreed to take the following actions: 1. notify the city of Lake Elmo that it may not put its plan into effect; 2. adopt a resolution requiring the city of Lake Elmo to modify its plan; 3. notify the city of Lake Elmo that its plan does not provide sufficient existing and new housing to meet the city's share of the metropolitan area need for low- and moderate - income housing; and 4. notify the city of Lake Elmo that the Council will apply its alignment policy to the city until such time as the Council finds that the city's plan is fully consistent with Council policies and in conformity with the Council's regional system plans. Transportation • authorized its Regional Administrator to amend and execute the following Metro Mobility Demand contracts for the remaining three years of their four -year term which ends June 30, 2005: 1. Transit Team, Inc., Contract No. 00P0062 -A for $1,190,000 for a new amount of $38,554,669; and Page 4 September 2002 2. Laidlaw Transit Services, Inc., Contract No. 00P0062 -B for: $70,000 for an additional 1,913.61 revenue hours during 2002; and $835,000 for a new total contract amount of $29,856,923. authorized its Regional Administrator to negotiate and execute a sole source contract with Motorola for the purchase of 195 radios and their installation to support 166 vehicles at a cost of $691,720 to operate on the Metropolitan Radio Board System. reviewed the proposed acquisition of property for a Maplewood Mall Transit Hub and Park -Ride Lot and authorized staff to negotiate the sale and purchase of property owned by the William J. Wade Trust and leased to the United Artist Theatre Company. authorized its Regional Administrator to negotiate and execute an interagency agreement with the city of St. Paul for: 1. continuation of station area planning along the corridor as outlined in the initial agreement; and 2. completion of the Hillcrest area station planning and the subsequent construction of bus stations with lighting, landscaping, sidewalk and boulevard improvements complimentary to the development of the Hillcrest opportunity site. authorized its Regional Administrator to execute an interagency law enforcement personnel services agreement with the Metropolitan Airports Commission for cost reimbursement to the Council for providing interim airport passenger check point DI I h, security enforcement. • authorized its Regional Administrator to amend Contract 97- 000 -057 with the Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company to extend the contract terms and conditions through December 31, 2002. • accepted the Aviation Advisory Task Force Report for future use in completing the Aviation Policy Plan update and preparing a public hearing document. authorized its Regional Administrator to negotiate and execute a grant with the Metropolitan Center for Independent Living (MCIL) to implement a Travel Instruction Program through December 31, 2003, for an amount not to exceed $93,000. authorized its Regional Administrator to begin negotiations with R.K. Midway for the purpose of exchanging all or a portion of 9.5 acres at Snelling -and St. Anthony for one or more parcels, of equal value, within the super block bordered by St. Anthony, Snelling, University and Pascal Avenues or other good and sufficient consideration. • adopted an amended 2025 Transitways Map to reflect the following changes requested by the Rush Line and Northeast Diagonal corridor task forces: 1. Change name of Minneapolis East busway to Northeast Diagonal; 2. Change name of Northeast busway to Rush Line; and 3. Add arrows to the radial corridors that may be extended in the future. • authorized its Regional Administrator to negotiate and amend the professional services agreement with Cubic to provide Page 5 September 2002 M ALMLJ`-\T'R�0 DI(iEST the following: 1. transfer the Riverview Corridor fare collection equipment to the Northwest Corridor and provide de- commissioning, storage, re- commissioning for the Northwest Corridor fare collection equipment; 2. provide and install wireless LAN systems for the Regional Provider Garages; 3. provide and install 19 additional onboard smart card readers for the Regional Provider fleet; and 4. provide five million magnetic stripe tickets for the Regional Fare Collection System project. • authorized the continuation of Route 43 using $2,700 in supplemental funding with the condition that Route 43 will continue to be included in the Sector 5 restructuring process with modifications to be implemented as early as September 2003. The Council Also: authorized the Metropolitan Council Redistricting Advisory Group to seek public comment and conduct a public meeting on redistricting proposals. The public comment meeting will be on Thursday, October 10, 2002, at 3:00 p.m. at Mears Park Centre. New Publications Council publications are available from the Council's Regional Data Center. For a free and complete list of publications, write the Metropolitan Council Data Center, 230 E. Fifth St., St. Paul, MN 55101, or call (651) 602 -1140. E -mail address is: data. center @metc.state.mn.us There is a charge for some publications. The bimonthly Council Directions newsletter provides. information on regional issues and Council Programs. If you wish to subscribe to Council Directions at no charge, call Dawn Hoffner at (651) 602 -1447. Metropolitan Commission Activities Metropolitan Airports Commission Parking ramp at $12 per day maximum fee effective October 1, 2002. Metropolitan Airports Commission offices are located at 6040 28th Av. S., Minneapolis, MN 55450. For more • accepted the preliminary 2003 -2009 Capital information, call Lynn Sorensen at (612) 726 -8186. Improvement Program for purposes of The Commission: environmental review with approval to proceed with a public hearing in November. approved the award of an on- airport auto rental concession to Enterprise Leasing Company for a term expiring May 31, 2004, with a two -year extension option. This concession was put out for bid subsequent to the bankruptcy filing of Alamo. • authorized establishment of a new parking rate for the Humphrey Terminal General • approved the extension of contracts with John F. Browm, Kutak Rock and First Albany for the provision of financial consulting services through 2004. • took action to notify the city of Minneapolis that it does not concur with their request to include certain properties located outside Page 6 September 2002 DIGE-Z the FAA approved areas for inclusion in the c. (Part 3) $5.87 million of State Part 150 Noise Insulation Program. funds or other revenues to acquire Resources (LCMR) recommended land in existing regional parks that Metropolitan Parks & Open Space was not proposed for funding in Commission (MP &OSC) parts 1 and 2 above, or to fully Metropolitan Council bonds to finance an acquisition Metropolitan Parks & Open Space Commission offices are reimbursement in the 2006 -2007 or located at Mears Park Centre, 230 E. Fifth St., St. Paul, 55101. For more information, call Sandi Dingle at (651) 2008 -2009 CIP, and to acquire�fee 602 -1312. title or conservation easements on bill. regionally - significant natural The Commission: resource lands in which the regional park implementing agency has • discussed parts of the 2004 -2005 Regional committed to managing these lands Parks Capital Improvement Program and as an amendment to an existing park Agency Allocations and recommended that or a new regional park system unit the Metropolitan Council: via master planning and approval by - the MPOSC and the Metropolitan 1. Endorse the preparation and ultimate Council. $3.92 million of adoption of a 2004 -05 Metropolitan Metropolitan Council bonds would Regional Parks Capital Improvement be a 40% match to the State funds Program of $40 million consisting of and other revenue. Any unused $16 million of Metropolitan Council Metropolitan Council bonds not bonds as a 40% match to State funds or needed to match State bonds other revenues totaling $24 million. appropriated in the Spring of 2004 or the LCMR recommended 2. Split the $40 million 2004 -05 Parks CIP appropriation proposed in July 2004 into four parts as follows: would be made available as additional matching funds in Part 3 a. (Part 1) $11 million of State bonds until the 2004 -2005 CIP was requested for appropriation in 2004 replaced with a 2006 -2007 CIP in matched with $7.33 million of May 2005. The Council bonds in Metropolitan Council bonds to this part may be used to match the finance the unfunded portion of the value of donated land as well as 2002 -2003 CIP and additional park matching other cash to buy land or projects. conservation easements. (Part 2) $6.5 million of Legislative d. (Part 4) $625,000 of MN Dept. of Commission on Minnesota Natural Resources (DNR) funds Resources (LCMR) recommended recommended to be appropriated in funds requested for appropriation in 2003 by the LCMR for the Metro 2005 matched with $4.33 million of Wildlife Corridors grant program Metropolitan Council bonds to matched with up to $417,000 of finance additional park acquisition, Metropolitan Council bonds to rehabilitation and development that restore degraded natural resource was not funded in the 2004 bonding areas in the Metropolitan Regional bill. Park System. If the DNR funds are Page 7 September 2002 M 1"T'R�O DlEiEST not appropriated, then the matching Metropolitan Council bonds in this part should be reallocated to Part 3. recommended that the Metropolitan Council use the 2002 -2003 Parks CIP park agency percentage allocations for Parts 1 and 2 of the 2004 -2005 Parks CIP and request park agencies to submit requests for Parts I and 2 of the 2004 -2005 Parks CIP based on what is stated in recommendation 2. • recommended that the Metropolitan Council consider reimbursing Ramsey County up to $55,000 in a future regional parks Capital Improvement Program under the terms of Park Policy B -7 for those costs to develop a section of Rice Creek North Regional Trail between I" Avenue NW and Englewood Drive in Mounds View, which is consistent with the conditions of that policy. Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission (MSFC) Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission offices are located at 900 South 5th St., Minneapolis, MN 55415. For more information, call Nancy Matowitz at (612) 335 -3310. The Commission took no formal actions during September. Page 8 September 2002 Steven A. Kirchman Building Official City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN. 55424 -1394 Dear Steve, N: .G, OCT 2002 I am writing this letter to thank you for your thoroughness in following through with all the logistics regarding the failed retaining wall. I am aware you spent a great deal of time, effort and energy trying to resolve this matter. It now APPEARS that a retaining wall has been constructed on the south side of 7020 Lanham Lane. To this end I want you to know your efforts are very much appreciated. Sincerely, Luther Brown 4x/� cc: Dennis Maetzold Mayor City of Edina 08- Oct -02