HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001-05-15_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
MAY 15, 2001
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL
ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the
Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda
items marked with an asterisk ( *) in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered
routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items
unless a Commissioner, Council Member or citizen so requests it In such cases the item will be
removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the Agenda.
* I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA - Regular Meeting of May 1, 2001
* II. CONFIRMATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS - As per Pre -List Dated 5/10/01 Total:
$27,062.83.
III. AWARD OF BID
* A. Excavation and Disposal of Contaminated Soils. Contract No. 01 -2 (HRA)
* B. Steel Bid Fabrication Package for Library and Senior Activity Center, Contract
No.01 -3 (HRA)
C. Steel Bid for Erection of Library and Senior Activity Center, Contract No. 01-4 (HRA)
IV. ADJOURNMENT
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
* I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of May 1, 2001
II.
Rollcall
EASEMENTS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Engineer. Public comment
heard. Motion to close hearing. If Council wishes to proceed, action by Resolution 3/5
favorable rollcall of Council Members required to pass.
A. VACATION OF EASEMENT - 6909 ST. PATRICK'S LANE
III. PUBLIC HEARING OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS - Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by Engineer. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. If Council
wishes to proceed, action by resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of the
Council required to pass if improvement is petitioned for; 4/5 favorable rollcall vote
required if no petition
Roll Call A. SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT S -068 - PARKLAWN AVENUE AND WEST 76TH
STREET
IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS - Affidavits of Notice by
Clerk. Presentation by Planner Public Comment heard. Motion to close hearing. Zoning
Ordinances: First and Second Reading require 4/5 favorable rollcall of all members of
Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall of all members of
Council to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District:
Agenda/ Edina City Council
May 15, 2001
Page 2
3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. Conditional Use Permit: 3/5 favorable rollcall
vote required to pass.
Roll Call A. AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE - ALLOWING CURRENCY EXCHANGE
IN CERTAIN ZONING DISTRICTS
Roll Call B. PRELIMINARY PLAT - GRANDVIEW SQUARE - SECOND ADDITION
V. AWARD OF BID
* A. Imp. No. LS -23, LS -24 & LS -25, Contract 01 -04 Lift Station, West Meadow Road
(ENG)
* B. Imp. No. BA -314 & BA -317, Contract No. 01 -1, Braemar Frontage and West 78th (ENG)
* C. Skid Steer Load, Public Works
VI. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS
* A. Traffic Safety Report of May 1, 2001
* B. Resolution Supporting Restrictions on the Use and Sale of Phosphorous Lawn
Fertilizers
C. Indian Way West Sound Wall Report
* D. Receive Feasibility Report and Set Hearing Date (6/5/01) - Improvement No. A -103
Alley Extension between Minnehaha Boulevard and Halifax Avenue
* E. Approve Plans Imp. TS -302 - West 76th & York Avenue
VII. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS
VIII. CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
IX. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES
X. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL
XI. MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEM
A. Dan Patch Commuter Rail Open House - May 30, 2001
XII. FINANCE
* A. CONFIRMATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS - As per Pre List Dated 5/2,/01 Total
$761,697.97 and per Pre List Dated 5/10/01 TOTAL $528,997.42.
SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS
Wed
May 16
SPECIAL ELECTION DAY
Thur
May 17
Special Council - Canvass of Election
5:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Mon
May 21
Council Workshop
5:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Mon
May 28
MEMORIAL DAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed
Tues
Jun 5
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBER°
Tues
Jun 16
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBER
Wed
Jul 4
INDEPENDENCE DAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed
Tues
Jul 17
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Tues
Aug 7
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Tues
Aug 21
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MINUTES
OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
HELD AT CITY HALL
MAY 1, 2001
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Hovland, Kelly, Masica, and Chair
Maetzold.
CONSENT AGENDA APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Hovland and
seconded by Commissioner Masica approving the Edina Housing and
Redevelopment Authority Agenda as presented.
Ayes: Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold
Motion carried.
*MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 17, 2001, APPROVED_ Motion
made by Commissioner Hovland and seconded by Commissioner Masica
approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Edina Housing and
Redevelopment Authority for April 17, 2001.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
*CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Motion made by Commissioner Hovland and
seconded by Commissioner Masica approving the payment of claims dated April
26, 2001, and consisting of one page totaling $2,884.53.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
There being no further business on the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority
Agenda, Chair Maetzold declared the meeting adjourned.
Executive Director
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check # Date Amount Vendor Explanation
13653 5/10/01 100668 BRW INC.
267.27 ARCHITECT FEES
267.27
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
5/10/01 — 5/10/01
PO # Doc No Inv No
18097 515 -00390
13654 5/10/01 100730 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP
480.52 LEGAL FEES
1,672.00 LEGAL FEES
2.152.52
13655 5/10/01 101537 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AG
540.00 PCA ENVIRONMENTAL CHARGES
540.00
13656 5110/01 101930 THOMAS & SONS CONSTRUCTION INC
17,328.47 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.9
17,328.47
13657 5/10/01 101930 THOMAS & SONS CONSTRUCTION INC
6,774.57 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 11
6,774.57
27,062.83 Grand Total
5/10101 9:39:31
Page - 1
Account No Account Description Business Unit
9132.1719 PROF FEES ARCH AND ENG CENTENNIAL LAKE TAX DISTRICT
18098 858076 -4130 9132.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL CENTENNIAL LAKE TAX DISTRICT
18098 858076 -4/30 9134.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL GRANDVIEW TAX DISTRICT
18099 041201 9134.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GRANDVIEW TAX DISTRICT
18100 051501 9132.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS CENTENNIAL LAKE TAX DISTRICT
18101 MAY 15 9132.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
Payment Instrument Totals
Check Total 27,062.83
Total Payments 27,062.83
CENTENNIAL LAKE TAX DISTRICT
R55CKSUM LOG20000
Company Amount
09000 HRA FUND 27,062.83
Report Totals 27,062.83
CITY OF EDINA 5/10/01 9:45:02
Council Check Summary Page - 1
5/10101 - 5/10101
We confirm to the best of our knowledge
and belief, that these claims
comply in all material respects
with the requirements of the City
of Edina purchasing policies and
procedures to , M '' l
Fina
anager
0 e rC
�y
\��RPORwTv-
1888
TO:
FROM:
VIA:
AGENDA ITEM: III.A.
DATE: May. 15, 2001
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
FRANCIS HOFFMAN, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
GORDON L. HUGHES, CITY MANAGER
UEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15
ITEM DESCRIPTION: ABATEMENT OF CONTAMINATED SOILS - GRANDVIEW
SQUARE
COMPANY
1. Kevitt Excavating
2. Veit & Company
3. Frattalone
4. Max Steininger, Inc.
5. Belair
RECOMMENDED BID:
KEVITT EXCAVATING
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
$122,375.00
BID AMOUNT
$122,375.00
$124,337.50
$141,972.50
$144,806.25
$145,168.55
GENERAL INFORMATION:
This bid is for the removal of contaminated soils on the second phase at Grandview Square.
This purchase is funded by HRA funds. The Engineering estimate on the project was at
$125,000.00.
PUBLIC WORKS - HRA
Department
The Re o end . is (within budget) F-1 (not within budget)
Gordon L. Hughes, Ci Manager John Wallin, Finance Director
o e ��
\�
coles8 .
TO:
FROM:
VIA:
AGENDA ITEM: III.B.
DATE: May 15, 2001
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
FRANCIS HOFFMAN, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
GORDON L. HUGHES, CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN. EXCESS OF $15,000
ITEM DESCRIPTION: STEEL BID FABRICATION PACKAGE, LIBRARY /SENIOR
CENTER
COMPANY BID AMOUNT
1. CENTRAL MN MANUFACTURING 1. $230,260.00
.2. 2•
3. 3.
4. 4.
RECOMMENDED BID:
CENTRAL MN MANUFACTURING $230,260.00
GENERAL INFORMATION:
This purchase is for the steel fabrication package for structural steel joists and deck for the
Library/Senior Center. This purchase is financed by the HRA .
Public Works - HRA
Department
The Recorypnended id i ff(within budget) (not within budget)
ffot� r�7v
rdon L. Hughes, C Manager
John Wallin, Finance Director
NA,
owe
t
y
�
v
BID AMOUNT
1.
DANNY'S CONSTRUCTION CO.
1.
• ,�� 1888
2.
TO:
FROM:
VIA:
SUBJECT:
AGENDA ITEM: III.C.
DATE: MAY 15, 2001
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
FRANCIS HOFFMAN, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
GORDON L. HUGHES, CITY MANAGER
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000
ITEM DESCRIPTION: STRUCTURAL STEEL ERECTION FOR LIBRARY /SENIOR
CENTER
COMPANY
BID AMOUNT
1.
DANNY'S CONSTRUCTION CO.
1.
$138,000.00
2.
AMERECT, INC.
2.
$154,000.00
3.
HIGH FIVE ERECTORS
3.
$161,800.00
4.
SOWLES COMPANY
4.
$183,920.00
RECOMMENDED BID:
DANNY'S CONSTRUCTION CO. $138,000.00
GENERAL INFORMATION:
This bid is to erect the structural steeljoists and steel deck for the Library/Senior Center
and furnish and install roof screen louvers. This purchase is financed by HRA funds.
PUBLIC WORKS - HRA
Department
The R ommended (within budget) (not within budget)
eze �.
Gor'dA L. Hughes, tity 14anager Z John Wallin, Finance Director
ow e
\�C�RP0 AP�4'C�
1888
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-29
WHEREAS, the sixth graders at Valley View Middle School observed that plastic
drink bottles were being thrown into the garbage and not recycled; and
WHEREAS, the students instituted a plastic bottle collection in a specially
designed container; and
WHEREAS, the sixth grade students volunteered and monitored the collection of
the plastic bottles for recycling during the lunch hour; and
WHEREAS, the efforts of the sixth grade students resulted in a cart of plastic
bottles being collected daily; and
WHEREAS, the Edina Recycling and Solid Waste Commission requested the City
Council recognize the endeavors of the Valley View Middle School Sixth Grade
Class.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Edina
hereby commends the Valley View Middle School Sixth Grade for their diligence
in preserving our resources by undertaking this recycling project which diverts a
recyclable resource from landfills.
Adopted this 15th day of May, 2001.
Attest:
Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Dennis F. Maetzold, Mayor
f
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
HELD AT CITY HALL
MAY 1, 2001- 7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Hovland, Kelly, Masica and Mayor Maetzold.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Hovland and
seconded by Member Masica approving the Council Consent Agenda as presented.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold
Motion carried.
*MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 17, 2001, AND BOARD OF
REVIEW MEETINGS OF APRIL 16, AND APRIL 23, 2001, APPROVED Motion made by
Member Hovland and seconded by Member Masica approving the Minutes of the Regular
Meeting of April 17, 2001, and Board of Review Meetings of April 16 and April 23, 2001.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. .
PRELIMINARY REZONING PCD-4, PLANNED COMMERCIAL DISTRICT4 TO PCD -1,
PLANNED COMMERCIAL DISTRICT -1, AND AMENDMENT TO THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR EDWARD AND LISA NOONAN - 5400 FRANCE
AVENUE SOUTH APPROVED Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered
placed on file.
Presentation by Planner
Planner Larsen explained the subject property is located in the southwest corner of West 54th
Street and France Avenue. The property is currently Zoned PCD-4, Planned Commercial
District. The PCD-4 district allows various automotive service uses. The site was originally
developed as a gas station in 1950. The tanks were removed in 1991, and the site was
converted to a Mr. Tire. The building also housed a CAR -X facility, but is currently vacant.
Mr. Larsen said Ed Noonan petitioned the City to rezone the 'property to PCD -1. The PCD -1
district is a general retail district. The property immediately west of the subject property is
PCD -1. Mr. Noonan intends to remodel the building for office use. The building has three
service bays facing France Avenue and one facing West 54t Street. Mr. Noonan plans to
convert one bay into office space and leave the remaining bays for parking and storage. The
proposed remodeling would create an office area of 752 square feet with an additional 550
feet of storage area. Seven parking spaces would be required for this facility by Edina Code.
The proposed site plan illustrates 11 angle stalls, 2 parallel stalls and 3 in -door stalls. Mr.
Larsen stated that Mr. Noonan's plan includes completely redoing the exterior of the
building. The existing flat roof would be replaced with a pitched roofed of either cedar or
slate shingles. Exterior walls would be brick and stucco with wooden garage doors. The
proposed materials meet Edina Code. Parking and circulation would remain unchanged. Mr.
Page 1
Minutes/Edina City Council/May 1, 2001
Larsen said the Planning Commission recommended approval of proposal subject to: Final
Rezoning, landscaping plan, and bond.
Council comment
Member Kelly asked what the status is of the property at 441h and France. Planner Larsen
explained the building is being occupied by tenants and Ed Noonan, was pleased to have
located the building at 5400 France for his business. Member Kelly inquired further about the
property at 44t" and France. Manager Hughes recollected there were concerns about the site's
orientation and the parking garage. Mr. Larsen indicated with some re- engineering of the
parking garage the parking variance was solved. Variances issued were because of non-
conforming setbacks, not the new structure. Use of the building was limited to non -food
related businesses.
Member Masica asked why a zoning change is required for the 5400 France Avenue building.
Mr. Larsen responded that general. office use is not permitted in a zoned PCD-4. PCD -4's uses
are for automobile service and car washes. Other neighborhood services would not be
allowed in the district. Ms. Masica inquired whether_ Mr. Noonan would have any other use
for the site.
Ed Noonan, 4700 Merilane, said the site was his first choice for his office, but his bid was
rejected. However, following acquisition of the 44th and France building, the owners of the
5400 France Avenue building accepted his offer. Mr. Noonan explained he has converted a
similar building previously, which won awards from the City of Minneapolis.
Member Hovland asked who the tenants would be at the 441h and France building. Mr.
Noonan said temporarily Noonan Construction will office in the lower level as the sole
tenant. Mr. Hovland inquired what an appropriate tenant would be for the lower space when
Noonan Construction moves out. Mr. Noonan said he has been approached by an insurance
company and an accounting firm. Mr. Hovland asked what will become of the parking
garage space when Noonan Construction vacates. Mr. Noonan explained the space has been
re- engineered to accommodate 21 parking spaces and does not require any parking variances
for retail or office use.
Member. Kelly made a motion to close the hearing. Member Masica seconded the motion.
Ayes: Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold .
Motion carried.
Member Kelly moved approval of the proposed preliminary rezoning and First Reading of
the following.
ORDINANCE NO. 850-A19
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 850)
BY REZONING PROPERTY TO PCD -1
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Subsection 850.06 of Section 850 of the Edina City Code is amended by adding
the following thereto:
Page 2
Minutes/Edina City Council/May 1, 2001
"The extent of the Planned Commercial District, PCD -1 is enlarged by the addition
of the following property:
That part of the North Half of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the
Northeast Quarter of Section 19, Township 28, Range 24, described as follows:
Commencing at the Northeast corner of said North Half of the Northeast
Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section,
thence South along the East line thereof 130.00 feet, thence West parallel with
the North line thereof 138.00 feet; thence North parallel with the East line
thereof 130.00 feet to the North line thereof; thence East along the North line
138.00 feet to the point of beginning; except the North 30.00 feet and except
the East 33.00 feet taken for road purposes.
And also:.
Commencing at.a point 130.00 feet South of the Northeast corner of Section
19, Township 28, Range 24; thence West 138.00 feet; thence South 25.00 feet;
thence east 138.00 feet, thence North 25.00 feet to the point of beginning.
The extent of the PCD-4, Planned Commercial District -4 is reduced by removing the
property described above from the Planned Commercial District -4." Member Hovland
seconded the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold
Motion carried.
PRELIMINARY REZONING AND AMENDMENT TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR
THE BANCOR GROUP, INC. R -1 SINGLE DWELLING UNIT DISTRICT TO PCD -3,
PLANNED RESIDENCE DISTRICT (4800 AND 4804 WEST 70th STREET) WITHDRAWN
BY APPLICANT Mr. Hughes noted that a letter dated April 26, 2001, was received by the
Planning Department withdrawing the application for the Preliminary Rezoning and
Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan for Bancor Group, 4800 and 4804 West 70th Street.
No further action was taken.
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR TMS DEVELOPMENT AND THORPE REAL
ESTATE (6512 VERNON AVENUE) APPROVED Affidavits of Notice were presented,
approved and ordered placed on file.
Presentation by Planner
Planner Larsen explained the proposed development is located at the northeasterly
intersection of Vernon Avenue and Tamarac. The proposed development is approximately 6
acres and the home of Chapel Hills Church. The site was initially reviewed as a single
dwelling subdivision. It is now the intent of the developer to develop the property as a
detached townhouse development. The proposal must be reviewed under the Planned
Residence District (PRD) standards of the Zoning Ordinance. The proposal also requires
amending the Comprehensive Plan from Quasi - Public to Low Density Attached Residential.
Chapel Hills Church would retain ownership of Lot 1 and Outlot A of the proposed plat.
Outlot A includes one half of the proposed private street allowing the church access to the
street from a new curb cut. The lot size for the church after development would be 3.3 acres
Page 3
Minutes/Edina City Council/May 1, 2001
which meets the 3 acre minimum lot size for a church. Mr. Larsen added that no variances
are being requested.
The PRD -2 district requires 7,200 square feet of lot area per dwelling unit. The development
proposes fourteen dwelling units in a townhouse style of development meaning each unit
has an individual lot. Nine of the units would be serviced from a private cul -de -sac off
Vernon Avenue and four units would. front on Tamarac. The proposed development
provides 9,650 square feet of lot area per unit. Maximum building coverage is limited to 25
percent. The building coverage proposed is 20 percent. The only variances requested are for
sideyard setbacks on lots 9 and 10. Interior sideyar'd setback in the PRD -2 district is 20 feet.
These two lots provide no setback from Outlot A: Mr. Larsen added the lots do meet the
setback requirement from the church property line.
Mr. Larsen explained that the Planning Commission recommended two. Council actions, 1)
changing the Comprehensive Plan designation from Single Family to Low Density
Residential, and 2), approving the Preliminary Rezoning from R -1, PRD -3, Planned Residence
District -3, subject to. the four conditions; 1) Final Rezoning, 2) Final Plat Approval, 3)
Developer's Agreement, 4) Watershed District Permits.
Council comment
Member Masica inquired if pictures of the proposed townhomes were available. Mr. Larsen
responded that the developer may have pictures. Member Masica voiced concern that the
homes might have a 'cookie- cutter' look. Mr. Larsen said while the footprint may be similar,
the units will have variations, both inside and outside.
Member Kelly asked if the immediately adjacent properties are all zoned R -1. Mr. Larsen said
all the homes that are on the north, west and south are traditional single family. There are
double homes to. the northeast.
Member Hovland asked if guest parking is included in the cul -de -sac. Mr. Larsen replied,
guest parking would need to be on the driveways of the individual units. Extra parking
might be allowed on one side of the sixteen foot street along Tamarac. Mr. Hovland asked if
staff was satisfied with the landscape plan as presented. Mr. Larsen said the plan was only a
concept. Mr. Hovland asked if after the City Engineer approved the drainage plan if
additional abatements were considered with the new development. Engineer. Hoffman said
originally water drained to a catch basin, but will now be held in a pond and discharged at a
slower rate. Mr. Hovland added this sounds like a positive thing for the single family homes
in the area. Mr. Hoffman concurred.
Mayor Maetzold inquired whether the street could be posted for NO PARKING even
thought it is not a public street. Mr. Larsen said yes it can be posted.
Developer's comments
Jeff Schoenwetter, 5232 Ridgewood Drive, explained Chapel Hills Church decided to sell
some of their property. with the help of Edina Realty. Twenty -eight requests for proposals
Page 4
Minutes/Edina City Council/May 1, 2001
were sent out and fifteen responded. The Church Council selected three finalists and JMS was
selected to move. forward with their proposal. The Church's objectives were to create a
compatible project with the existing neighborhood, focusing on quality residential single
family dwellings. The church will retain 3.3 acres of land but since they not expect to. expand
their church home, they have offered the land for sale. The proposed plat solidifies solutions
for existing drainage problems, and facilitates the needs of the church.
Mr. Schoenwetter introduced the JMS development team.. Sam Thorpe, a third generation
Edina developer, resident and Mr. Schoenwetter's partner and Mr. Plagemann, Engineer and
partner who also resides in Edina. He explained JMS. specialty is single family homes. The
proposed development is 'turn-key' meaning it will have an association which assures
maintenance of the homes and neighborhood. The homes are, cottage inspired, have options
for universal design and could be considered transitional housing which is in higher demand
in Edina. Mr. Schoenwetter said the most important concept is that the units are custom and
have three floor plans that fit within the footprint. The subject area is a mixed use area with
predominantly twin homes, some single family homes, condominiums and apartment
houses. Mr. Schoenwetter added the plan unanimously approved by the neighborhood
eliminates a curb -cut allowing church traffic access through the cul -de -sac. Mr. Schoenwetter
said single side street parking is being suggested and he pointed out each home has two
driveway parking spots.
Mr. Schoenwetter said neighbors on Tamarac asked what would happen if only three homes
were built and 10 homes on the cul -de -sac. He said the most significant difference would be
that Outlot C would become smaller. Most trees on the site will remain intact. Mr.
Schoenwetter explained the variety of space uses for the cottage style home footprints. He
stated there is a great demand.for this type of life -cycle housing. Following meetings with the
neighborhood, residents expressed that the plan bolsters their confidence to improve their
homes.
Public Comment
Mark Brauer, 2006 Girard Avenue, explained that Chapel Hills Church has been part of the
community for forty years and they want to be good stewards of the land. The Church would
like to convert their excess land into something that would generate funds for maintenance of
their church.
Don Kennedy, 5928 Tamarac, stated he lives across the street from the proposed
development. Mr. Kennedy said in his opinion three houses on Tamarac fits best into the
neighborhood and he asked that the Council ensure no more than three houses are approved
for Tamarac.
Dick Bastyr, 6504 Aspen Road, said he understood the concern of Tamarac residents, but also
expressed concern that pushing the "extra house" on his side of the development would
adversely affect Aspen Road residents. Mr. Bastyr supported four homes on Tamarac and
nine homes on the cul -de -sac.
Page 5
Minutes/Edina City Council/May 1 ,2 001
Bill Peria, 5932 Tamarac, said a simple solution to the issue would be to reduce the total
number in the development by one with three on Tamarac and nine on Aspen.
Scott Johnson, 7115 Tupa Drive, said he is a 40 -year member of Chapel Hills Church. Mr.
Johnson said the points raised by neighbors were also raised at the Planning Commission
meeting. He noted the developer needs 13 units to make the development feasible. Mr.
Johnson urged the Council to support the Planning Commission's recommendation and
approve the proposal as, submitted.
Member Hovland inquired what costs would be affected if approval were granted for three
homes on Tamarac and nine on the cul -de -sac. Mr. Schoenwetter said pricing would be pro-
rated among the approved number of lots. Mr. Hovland asked the difference with the four to
five ratio compared to the four to four ration of back -to -back homes. Mr. Schoenwetter
explained ' the adjustments made to the cul -de -sac and entrance space to accommodate both
scenarios.
Member Kelly made a motion to close the hearing. Member Masica seconded the motion.
Ayes: Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold
Motion carried.
Council comment
Member Kelly stated he did not favor additional lots on the cul -de -sac as it compromises the
appearance of the site. He believes that removing one home on Tamarac would ` not be a
hardship for the developer and he encouraged approval of nine lots on the cul -de -sac.
Uniformity in the area, in his opinion, is extremely important. Mr. Kelly. stated his
concurrence with the plan as reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission (four
homes on Tamarac and nine on the cul -de -sac) or reduce the total development by one lot on
Tamarac.
Member Hovland said there is a demand in Edina for housing of this type, and thanked the
developer for the' proposal. He said he favored three homes on Tamarac. He asked the
developer what, would happen if 10 units in the development were approved and asked for a
comparison with Olde Vernon. Mr. Schoenwetter deferred to Planner Larsen as he is not
familiar with Olde Vernon. Mr. Larsen explained the sideyard setbacks at Olde Vernon are as
little as five feet with a building separation of ten feet. Mr. Hovland asked if 10 units were
approved for the main development, what would the sideyard setbacks be. Mr. Larsen said
staff has not reviewed that scenario. Mr. Hovland commented that this proposal would not
have as much building mass as Olde Vernon.
Member Masica indicated that 1) the drainage plan is very good; and 2) there is a real need
for this type of housing. She voiced objection to the 'cookie cutt er' type of construction, but
the changes in the exterior look will help that. Ms. Masica favors three homes on Tamarac
and nine units on the cul -de -sac.
Page 6
Minutes/Edina City Council/May 1, 2001
Mayor Maetzold voiced agreement with the nine unit concept and three units on Tamarac.
He explained it appears that the Council will approve the three units on Tamarac and nine on
the cul -de -sac and he asked for an opinion 'by the developer. Mr. Schoenwetter said if he
were given more design flexibility, the Council's vision of custom homes on the three lots
could be realized.
Member Kelly reiterated that larger does not mean variances on the lots.
Mr. Larsen explained the intent of this type of zoning is to gather a uniform product with
some cohesiveness as to size and design which is probably inevitable considering the area
and site. Mr. Kelly said what he believes the Council is envisioning is that there will be
proportionate increases in the sizes of the Tamarac lots but still maintain consistency in the
proportional relationship between the size of the unit and the size of the lot.
Mr. Hughes said the action necessary would be to grant preliminary approval with
conditions to be reflected in the final development plan which would go back to the Planning
Commission and back to the Council in due course.
Member Kelly made a motion to grant preliminary approval to JMS Development and
Thorpe Real Estate subject to the following changes from the plan approved by the
Planning Commission: 1) the number of lots be reduced from .thirteen to twelve, 2) the
three lots facing on Tamarac footprint be increased proportionately with the size of lot
size. Member Hovland seconded the motion.
Member Kelly withdrew the motion. Member. Hovland withdrew the second.
Member Kelly made a motion to grant first reading to Ordinance No. 850 -A20 rezoning the
property as proposed and granting, preliminary approval to JMS Development and Thorpe
Real Estate subject to the following changes to the previously approved Planning
Commission plan: 1) the number of lots be reduced from thirteen to twelve, 2) the
proposed lots facing on Tamarac be reduced by one, 3) the footprint for the building of the
lots on Tamarac be permitted to increase proportionately with the increase of the lots size.
ORDINANCE NO. 850-A20'
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 850)
BY REZONING. PROPERTY TO PRD -2
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 1. Subsection 850.06 of Section 850 of the Edina City Code is amended by adding
the following thereto:
"The extent of the Planned Residential District, PRD -2 is enlarged by the addition
of, the following property:
That part of Lot 1, Block 1, Gleason First Addition, Hennepin County,
Minnesota, lying east of the westerly 110 feet thereof and that part of the
westerly 110 feet of said Lot 1, lying south of the north ten feet thereof.
The extent of the R -1 Single Dwelling District is reduced by removing the property
described above." Member Hovland seconded the motion.
Page 7
Minutes/Edina City Council/May 1, 2001
Rollcall:
Ayes: Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold
Motion carried.
Member Kelly introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-28
AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that the
Comprehensive Plan of the City be amended by changing the designation from Single
Family to Low Density Residential for the property described as:
That part of Lot 1, Block 1, Gleason First Addition, Hennepin County,
Minnesota, lying east of the westerly 110 feet thereof and that part of the
westerly 110 feet of said Lot 1, lying south of the north ten feet thereof.
Adopted this 1s' day of May, 2001.
Member Hovland seconded the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold
Motion carried.
*HEARING DATE SET OF MAY 15, 2001, FOR PLANNING MATTERS Motion made by
Member Hovland and seconded by Member Masica setting May 15, 2001, as hearing date
for the following planning matters:
1. Preliminary Plat Approval. Grandview Square 2nd-Addition, Phase II. Generally
located south of Eden Avenue and east of Vernon Avenue;
2. Amend Zoning Ordinance: Amend Ordinance allowing state licensed currency
exchanges in certain zoning districts.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
*BID AWARDED FOR AQUATIC -VEGETATION CONTROL SERVICES Motion made
by Member Hovland and seconded by Member Masica for award of bid for aquatic
vegetation control services to recommended low bidder, Lake Restoration, Inc., at
$19,341.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
OFF -LEASH DOG PARK' REPORT PRESENTED Director Keprios explained that at a
previous meeting, the Council directed staff to conduct a study to determine if there was a
reasonable site for an off -leash dog park within the City. Ingraham and Associates were hired
to study'the issue and worked with staff to look at potential.sites for a suitable off -leash dog
park in addition to the one planned at the Minneapolis Public Works site on France Avenue.
Mr. Ingraham identified four potential areas: 1) Creek Valley Park (near water tower), 2)
Braemar Park (site of former gun range), 3) Walnut Ridge Park (within south end of
pathway), and 4) Van Valkenburg Park (around holding pond).
Mr. Ingraham presented his findings at the April 10, 2001, Park Board meeting. He
elaborated that none of the four sites was ideal for an off -leash dog park site. Walnut Ridge
Page 8
Minutes/Edina City Council/May 1, 2001
Park has a large flat open area for dogs to run but is not accessible due to its location. The
Park Board, after lengthy discussions, recommended not using the Creek Valley Park at this
time and recommended that only the Minneapolis Public Works property on France Avenue
be considered as an off -leash dog park.
Greg Ingraham, Ingraham and Associates, explained there was no one ideal location for an
off -leash dog exercise area in Edina. The established criteria for an off -leash dog park site
are: 1) - 2 1/2 acres lot size, 2) open flat exercise area, 3) suitable buffers for surrounding
properties, 4) good visibility and access, 5) parking, 6) fence or -boundary, and 7) involved
citizen group to monitor and maintain park.
Creek Valley
• irregular site with little flat area
• parking exists.
• high visibility with convenient access
• drawbacks are small site'size and lack of flat terrain
Braemar /Public Works
• requires extensive grading, fencing and reconfiguration
•
area. contemplated for regional police and fire training facility
• no room for off -leash park if training facility is built
Walnut Ridge Park
• center area only is suitable for off -leash park
• low wet site makes turf management difficult
• fencing required
• hidden access to neighborhood park
• dog use area would be approximately 200 feet from nearest home
Van Valkenburg Park
• small area around pond somewhat suitable
• area located between lower parking area and Lincoln Drive
Mr. Ingraham concluded that the suggested Edina locations are marginal at best. The Park
Board concluded that the only off -leash dog park to be considered at this time would be the
France Avenue site.
Member Masica voiced excitement about the possibility of an off -leash dog park in Edina and
stated she did not care, where it would be located. She inquired whether a 'trial run' could be
done at one of the proposed locations and believes it would be self- maintaining. Mr.
Ingraham explained dog ownership is up and whatever site was picked, it would get use.
Mayor Maetzold asked if discussions are on -going with the City of Minneapolis. Mr. Keprios
said he, Mr. Hughes and Chief Siitari met with persons in similar positions with the City of
St. Louis Park, the Minneapolis Park Board staff, Animal Control Officer, Attorney, and
Page 9
Minutes/Edina City Council/May 1, 2001
administrative staff. Emanating from that meeting was a memo. setting a number of
conditions to make the site plausible for both Edina and St. Louis Park. The Minneapolis Park
Board is anxious to make the site work and intend to meet the conditions.
Following a brief Council discussion, Mayor Maetzold made a motion to accept the report of
the Park Board and direct staff to continue discussions on the Minneapolis site. Member
Masica seconded the motion.
Ayes: Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold
Motion carried.
*RESOLUTIONS NOS. 2001 -27A AND 2001 -27B ADOPTED APPROVING Mn/DOT
INTERCHANGE CONSTRUCTION COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS FOR 77TH STREET
AND T.H.100 Motion made by Member Hovland and seconded by Member Masica
introducing the following and moving its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-27A
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Edina enter into Mn/DOT
Agreement No. 77637 with the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation for the
following purposes:
To provide payment by the State to the City of, the State's share of the costs of the
intersection reconstruction and other associated construction of the Trunk Highway
No. 100 ramps and loops with West 77th Street which is to be performed within the
.corporate City limits under State Project No. 2733 -78 (T.H.100 =005).
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the proper City officers be and - hereby are authorized
to execute such agreement, and thereby assume for and on behalf of the City all of the
contractual obligations contained therein.
Adopted this 1st day of May, 2001.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
Motion made by Member Hovland and seconded by Member Masica introducing the
following and moving its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-27B
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Edina enter into Mq/DOT
Agreement No. 80359R with the State of Minnesota. Department of Transportation for the
following purposes:
To remove the existing traffic control signals and install new traffic control signals
with street lights, emergency vehicle pre - emption and signing on Trunk Highway
No. 100 West Ramps - Trunk Highway No. 100 West Frontage Road at Industrial
Boulevard - Industrial Boulevard/West 771h Street on Trunk Highway No. 100 East
Ramps - Trunk Highway No. 100 East Frontage Roads at West 77th Street- West 77th
Street/Industrial Boulevard, and on West 77th Street at Pentagon Park Office - Private
Drive; and install interconnect on West 771h Street/Industrial Boulevard form Trunk
Highway No. 100 West Ramps - Trunk Highway No. 100 West Frontage Road to
Trunk Highway No. 100 East Ramps - Trunk Highway No. 100 East Frontage Road in
accordance with the terms and conditions set forth and contained in Agreement No.
803598.
Page 10
Minutes/Edina City Council/May 1, 2001
r BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the proper City officers be and hereby are _authorized
to execute such agreement, and thereby assume for and on behalf of the City all of the
contractual obligations contained therein.
Adopted this 1s' day of May, 2001.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
FIRST AMENDMENT APPROVED FOR FACILITIES USE AGREEMENT Mr. Hughes
explained the City of Edina and Independent School District No. 273 executed the Joint
Powers Agreement and Facility Use Agreement for the contemplated referendum projects
last month. Following further review. of these agreements, the Joint Powers Board
recommended an Amendment to the Facility Use Agreement to clarify. some points. The
Amendment provides the following:
1. The parties agree that a school principal may deny use for City sponsored activities
during the school day, if the principal concludes that the use would be
incompatible with educational uses of the school.
2. The Amendment clarifies the available hours of use for swimming pools. .
3. The Amendment clarifies that the District may charge a fee at Kuhlman Field for
the use of field lighting.
4. The Amendment provides that the District may use outside gifts and donations for
the purpose of off- setting costs associated with the operation of facilities.
The Board of Education approved the proposed amendment at its April 23, 2001, meeting.
Member Kelly made a motion approving the First Amendment to the Facilities Use
Agreement as presented. Member Masica seconded the motion.
Member Kelly said the Amendment is an attempt to resolve some of the issues raised by the
opposition to the referendum. Member Masica added the original agreement just needed
some fine - tuning.
Ayes: Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold
Motion carried.
AMENDED JOINT AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR SOUTHWEST
SUBURBAN CABLE COMMISSION Mr. Hughes indicated that a Amendment is being
proposed to the Joint and Cooperative Agreement with respect to the Southwest Suburban
Cable Commission. The Commission has prepared this amendment for. consideration and
approval by its member cities (Edina, Eden Prairie, Minnetonka, Hopkins and Richfield).
During its review of applications for new franchises, the Commission noted that the existing
Joint and Cooperative Agreement was in need of updating to reflect the current practices of
the Cable Commission. The commission has reviewed the attached Amendment and
recommends its adoption by member cities.
Member Masica made a motion approving the Amended Joint and Cooperative Agreement
for the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission. Member Hovland seconded the motion.
Ayes: Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold
Page 11
Minutes/Edina City Council/May 1, 2001
Motion carried.
*PETITION RECEIVED REQUESTING STREET LIGHTING FOR RYAN AVENUE
BETWEEN VALLEY VIEW AND WEST 62ND STREET Motion made by Member Hovland
and seconded by Member Masica acknowledging receipt of petition for street lighting for
Ryan Avenue between Valley View and West 62nd Street and to refer the petition .to
Engineering for processing as to feasibility.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
*PETITION RECEIVED REQUESTING SOUND WALL BETWEEN 6736 AND 6744
INDIAN WAY WEST Motion made by Member Hovland and seconded by Member
Masica acknowledging receipt of petition for a sound wall for 328 along McCauley Trail at
Indian Way West and to'refer the petition to Engineering for processing as to feasibility.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four. ayes.
*CONFIRMATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS Member Hovland made a motion and
Member Masica seconded the motion approving payment of the following claims as
shown in detail on the Check Register dated April 19, 2001, and consisting of 28 pages:
General Fund $304,439.97, CDBG Fund $6,852.65; Working Capital Fund $3,343.86,
Construction Fund $379.00; Art Center Fund $1,876.74; Golf Dome Fund $1,175.58; Aquatic
Center Fund $442.5& Golf Course Fund $27,541.41; Ice Arena Fund $13,251.08;
Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fund $16,980.01; Liquor Fund $109,953.03; Utility Fund
$266,148.23; Storm Sewer Fund $2,024.53; Recycling Fund $29,43150; Payroll Fund
$375,000.00; TOTAL $1,158,842.17 .and for Check Register dated April 26, 2001, and
consisting of 30 pages; General Fund $228,490.31; Communications Fund $1,346.77;
Working Capital Fund $2,593.58; Construction Fund $16,319.64, Art Center Fund $17,515.79;
Golf Dome Fund $50.00, Aquatic Center Fund $317.09; Golf Course Fund $34,359.94; Ice
Arena Fund $1,497.36; Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fund $9,280.64, Liquor Fund
$117,810.62; Utility Fund $95,590.58; Storm Sewer Fund $2,220.00; Recycling Fund $4,605.00;
TOTAL $531,997.32.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold
Motion carried.
There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Maetzold declared the
meeting adjourned at 9:15 P.M.
City Clerk
Page 12
ti
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Francis Hoffmano,e
City Engineer
Date: 15 May 2001
Subject: Vacation of utility easement
located on property at 6909 St. Patricks
Lane.
Agenda Item # II.A
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
® To Council
Action ❑ Motion
® Resolution
Ordinance
Discussion
Recommendation: Vacate utility easement located on the common lot line of Lots
10 and 11 except for the easterly five feet of the easement.
Info /Background: The property owner requests vacation of an existing utility
easement which lies beneath the existing home at 6909 St. Patricks Lane. (See
attached graphic.) City staff has reviewed the request, as have Qwest, Excel Energy,
Reliant Energy, and Time Warner. All concur that the easement can be vacated. Thus,
staff recommends vacation of requested easement except for the easterly five feet.
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Wayne Houle
Assist. Public Works Director
Date: May 15, 2001
Subject: Public Hearing for:
Sidewalk Improvement No.
S -068 Parklawn Avenue
from West 77th Street to
West 76th Street and West
76th Street from Parklawn
Avenue to France Avenue.
Recommendation:
Agenda Item #
III. A.
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Mgr. Recommends
❑ To HRA
® To Council
Action
® Motion
® Resolution
❑ Ordinance
❑
Discussion
If the Council determines the project to be warranted and necessary, Council shall adopt a
resolution approving Sidewalk Improvement S -068, authorize plans and specifications to
be completed and bids taken.
Info /Background:
This project was initiated by staff on April 17, 2001. The Feasibility Study was submitted to
Council on April 17. 1 have attached a copy of this Feasibility Study along with Notice of
Public Hearing to this report.
The estimated project cost is $170,000. Funding for this project would be from the
Municipal State Aid System, commonly known as the gas tax funds.
I have received one phone calls regarding this project; the property owner was in support
of the project and had concerns regarding disturbances of existing landscaping. "
Staff analyzed the project and feels that the project is feasible from an engineering
standpoint.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS
IMPROVEMENT S -068
May 2, 2001
Dear «OWNERNAME»
The Edina City Council will meet in the Council Chambers at the Edina City Hall on
Tuesday, May 15, 2001 at 7:00 PM to consider the proposed sidewalk improvements on
PARKLAWN AVENUE FROM WEST 77TH STREET TO WEST 76TH STREET
AND WEST 76TH STREET FROM PARKLAWN AVENUE TO FRANCE
AVENUE to be constructed to be constructed using Municipal State -Aid funds. No
special assessments are proposed for this project.
Such persons as desire to be heard with reference to the proposed improvement will be
heard at this meeting. This hearing has been called as a recommendation from staff.
The proposed project would be constructed in 2001.
PROPOSED SIDEWALKS
N
W Y E
5
Any inquiries, comments and /or suggestions you may have regarding this improvement
may be forwarded to the City Council or Engineering Department prior to the hearing or
presented at the hearing itself. If you desire additional information, please contact me at
952 - 826 -0443 between 8:00 AM and 4:30 PM, Monday through Friday.
Thank you,
Wayne D. Houle, P.E.
Assistant Director of Public Works
A,I
FEASIBILITY STUDY - S068
s �° ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
',�h„ N,,,• CITY OF EDINA
PARKLAWN AVENUE
SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS S -068
April 17, 2001
LOCATION: Parklawn Avenue from West 77'h Street to West 76th Street and
West 76th Street from Parklawn Avenue to France Avenue.
INITIATION & ISSUES: This project was initiated by staff.
w�E
8
EXISTING CONDITIONS: Parklawn Avenue and West 76th Street consists of a 46 foot wide
bituminous roadway flanked with curb and gutter on both sides.
Right -of -ways this roadway are 60 feet. The right -of -ways along
West 76th Street and the easterly right -of -way along Parklawn
Avenue contain minimal landscaping and are fairly level.
The average daily traffic along Parklawn Avenue and West 77"
Street is 9,400 and 10,500, respectively. This traffic is anticipated
to increase 6% over the next twenty years.
IMPROVEMENT: Construct sidewalks along the easterly side of Parklawn Avenue
from West 77th Street to West 76th Street and and along both sides
of West 76th Street from Parklawn Avenue to France Avenue. A
Feasibility Study
Parklawn Avenue and West 76th Street Sidewalks
April 17, 2001
Page 2
five wide back -of -curb style sidewalks is proposed along these
routes due to the lack of right -of -way.
Construction of these sidewalks would involve removing 4 -8 inches
of topsoil and replacing with a 4 inch concrete sidewalk over a 4
inch aggregate base. Construction of the sidewalk at bituminous
driveways will consist of removing the existing driveway material
and replacing with a 6 inch concrete sidewalk section over 4 inches
of aggregate base; concrete driveways will remain inplace.
PROPOSED SIDEWALKS
RIGHT -OF -WAY: Adequate right -of -way exists for a back -of -curb style sidewalk.
FEASIBILITY: Due to the amount of traffic on these roadways a sidewalk to
separate vehicles and pedestrians would be recommended. This
project is also feasible from an engineering standpoint.
EASEMENTS: No additional easements will be required.
COMPLETION: 2001 Construction Season (June- October)
FUNDING: This project will be funded through the Municipal State Aid system.
No special assessments will be required.
Feasibility Study
Parklawn Avenue and West 76th Street Sidewalks
April 17, 2001
Page 3
PROJECT COSTS: The total estimated project cost is $170,000. The estimated
project cost includes indirect costs of 22.5 %, which includes
engineering, clerical, and finance costs.
PROJECT SCHEDULE: The following schedule is feasible from an Engineering standpoint
only if Council orders this project:
Council Orders Public Hearing ...................... April 17, 2001
Receive Feasibility Report ............................ April 17, 2001
Public Hearing ................ ............................... May 15, 2001
Bid Opening ......................... ............................... July, 2001
Award Contract .................... ............................... July, 2001
Begin Construction ......... ............................... August, 2001
Complete Construction ............................. November, 2001
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Craig Larsen
City Planner
Date: May 15, 2001
Subject:
Amendment to Zoning
Ordinance - Allowing
Currency Exchange in Certain
Zoning districts
Recommendation:
Agenda Item: IV. A.
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. RecommendsEl
Action: ❑
El
To H RA
To Council
M
Rotion
esolution
Ordinance
Discussion
The Planning Commission recommends amending the Zoning Ordinance to
allow currency exchange businesses in the PCD -2, PCD -3, and PID Zoning Districts.
Info /Background:
See attached Planning Commission minutes and staff report.
DRAFT MINUTES P.C. MEETING APRIL 25, 2001
Amend Zoning Ordinance To Allow Currency Exchanges In Certain
Districts
Mr. Larsen informed the Commission financial institutions are currently
allowed in all commercial districts, the office district, the industrial district, the
mixed development district and the regional medical district. The zoning
ordinance does not contain a definition for financial institution.
Mr. Larsen explained recently, Unbank, a currency exchange business
opened at a retail strip mall on Edina Industrial Boulevard just west of highway
100. The business provides a number of financial services, including check
cashing and money orders. While this business may be appropriate at this
location, it may not be appropriate at others.
Mr. Larsen concluded since currency exchange businesses are logically
related to employment centers, staff recommends amending the Zoning
Ordinance to allow "currency exchange" businesses in the PCD -2, PCD -3 and
the PID districts.
Commissioner McClelland referred to the memo from Deputy Chief
Schwartz and asked Mr. Larsen if the Commission approves this amendment is it
possible to place a fee on police calls to the facility that exceed a certain
number. Mr. Larsen responded he is not sure if that is legal. He explained at
present if a false alarm occurs at a commercial site a fee is charged for each
false alarm exceeding two per year (that would also include this facility).
Continuing, Mr. Larsen said the police would need to determine the nature of
calls. He pointed out the Edina Police Department continually deals with a large
amount of calls generated from Southdale Center and the Galleria concerning
"bad checks ", shop - lifters, etc., reiterating he is not sure if a fee would be
appropriate at this facility.
Commissioner Losnbury asked if the Commission could add to the
approval process that facilities of this nature need to be licensed by the state as
currency exchanges. Mr. Larsen said that is an option.
Commissioner McClelland asked if this is the first facility in the City of this
nature. Mr. Larsen explained this is the first. He explained his research has
found that a growing amount of immigrants who work in the area are not familiar
with US banking systems, and are uncomfortable using them. He noted many
immigrants also send money home to their families, and this facility provides that
service. Mr. Larsen reported facilities such as this also provide bus passes and
other amenities.
Commissioner Swenson moved to recommend approval of an Ordinance
amendment allowing currency exchanges to be located in the PCD -2, PCD -3
and PID zoning districts. The currency exchanges are also to be licensed by the
State of Minnesota. Commissioner Lonsbury seconded the motion. All voted
aye; motion carried.
I
EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION
APRIL 25, 2001
STAFF REPORT
Amend Zoning. Ordinance To Allow Currency Exchanges In Certain
Districts
Financial institutions are currently allowed in all commercial districts, the
office district, the industrial district, the mixed development district and the
regional medical district. The zoning ordinance does not contain a definition for
financial institution.
Recently, Unbank, a currency exchange business opened at a retail strip
mall on Edina Industrial Boulevard just west of highway 100. The business
provides a number of financial services, including check cashing and money
orders. While this business may be appropriate at this location, it may not be
appropriate at others. Attached is some background information on currency
exchange businesses.
Since currency exchange businesses are logically related to employment
centers, staff recommends amending the Zoning Ordinance to allow "currency
exchange" businesses in the PCD -2, PCD -3 and the PID districts.
1. What are check cashers?
Check cashers are typically operators of small businesses who serve their local communities
by providing safe, convenient and timely financial services.
2. How long have check cashers been around?
The check cashing industry emerged in response to banking practices and changes in
employer payment practices growing out of the Depression of the 1930s.
3. Who uses check cashing services?
Surveys indicate that check cashers serve an increasingly broad spectrum of Americans.
Check cashing centers traditionally were concentrated in lower income neighborhoods. As
middle income consumers have demanded more convenient financial services, check cashers
have expanded into their communities.
4. Why do people use check cashers.
A number of reasons. They prefer the convenience, the more timely operating hours, and
the faster service. Check cashing outlets have simplified community financial services
delivery, particularly the process of cashing a check. Just as more people today prefer the
convenience of specialty stores to large department stores, an increasing number of
consumers prefer the convenience of a check cashing center to a bank.
5. How has the industry grown?
In recent years, the growth of the industry has been dramatic. The check cashing industry
grew gradually until the 1980s. Then, aided by the Bank Deregulation Act of 1980, the
industry grew rapidly. The Bank Deregulation Act removed bank deposit ceilings and led to
explicit pricing for bank deposit services. Faced with a new banking environment,
Headquarters:
One Mack Centre Drive, Mack Centre II, Paramus, New Jersey 07652 Ph: (201)- 777 -9870 Fax: (201) 773 -6983
1023 15th Street, N.W., Seventh Floor. Washington, D.C., 20005
i
consumers demanded increased convenience and lower costs in fulfilling their financial
services needs. Community -based check cashing centers which provide convenient access to
financial services became increasingly utilized.
6. What is the size of the industry today?
Today the industry is composed of approximately 4,500 check cashing centers, which cash
more than $150 million checks annually with an aggregate face value of more than $45
billion.
7. What do check rashers charge for their services?
Check cashers charge a fee, typically based upon a percentage of the face value of the
check. Several states set ceilings on such fees. The average fee charged throughout the U.S.
ranges from 2-3% of the face value of the check.
8. How are check casher fees established?
Like any other business, check cashing fees are based on two elements: 1) the cost of doing
business and 2) realizing a reasonable rate of return on investment. In addition, there are
several unique risks and costs associated with the special service and convenience afforded
by check cashers.
Cashing a check in a bank normally means a consumer must wait for his check to "clear"
through the banking system, anywhere between 2 and 5 days. This isn't acceptable to many
consumers, who seek immediate use of their money and are unwilling to wait.
Check rashers therefore offer immediate use of the money, personally assuming the risk of
loss for the checks they cash. While bank deposits help "insulate" these institutions from
bad check losses with compensating deposit balances, check cashers have no such protection
from loss.
9. What other services are provided by check cashers?
Numerous services in addition to cashing checks. Many check rashers also offer money
orders, money wire transfers, welfare benefit and food stamp distribution, electronic bill
payment services, electronic government benefit distribution, electronic tax preparation and
filing, public transportation fares and tokens, lottery tickets, and distribution of license
plates and motor vehicle titles.
10. What is NaCCA?
NaCCA is the professional association of the check cashing industry. Its members constitute
more than 2,400 individual check cashing centers in 35 states. NaCCA is the industry's
leading voice on legislative, regulatory and business issues.
11. What has NaCCA achieved?
NaCCA forged adoption of a national Code of Conduct that specifies ethical standards for
the industry. NaCCA created a Statement of Principles that commits members to vigorously
combat money laundering. In this context, NaCCA has proposed that the U.S. Congress
encourage a national registration program, under the auspices of the U.S. Treasury
Department, for check cashers, money order sellers, and agents of money transmitters.
12. What future plans does NaCCA have to combat money laundering?
NaCCA has commissioned the Morley Group of Arlington, Va. to create an anti -money
laundering manual for the industry. The manual, scheduled for fall 1993 publication, will
provide employee training guidelines on Federal regulations designed to combat money
laundering and provide a comprehensive analysis to check rashers of common money
laundering methods, currency reporting requirements and civil and criminal sanctions
relating to this issue. The manual will focus on transactions check cashers may encounter,
including the purchase of money orders and wire transfers.
i
October 30, 2000
► T' -s -B F.'O1101 F -400
� w
Craig Larsen
Director of :Planning .
City of Edina
2917 Bryant Ave. 5, Suite 5.
�80i b'e't, �5�14,1394
Ed
:'. Minneap6 is, MN 5540.8
x 952 826 - 0390:
Dear Craig::; .
(612) 822 -2924
(612) 822 - 6340 Fax..
,1 to l Orrrl vo, u`that the Unbar Company is a currency
111 1� nf
exchange.- %V L' cash checks: sell_mpne�o� ne'�ardstpar Spaidiccell
Ion- distant p
I�oneyvrani, sell stamps, t for
*.ers. 1'e
cards; envelopes, ciga:e:tes,1ig11
O est and Excel Energy- We offer notary services and fax and.
photocopy services..
IvVe do riot participate in any way in the paa7ii1ig of merchandise.
We have
1�ie also .do not buy merchandise. We are not a pawnshop,
been in l?,u;iness since 1994-
if you have any.-:.questions, please Call.
sincerely,
_
Stuart Topper
."Vice President
EDINA POLICE DEPARTMENT
Memo
To: Craig Larson
From: S.A. Schwartz Jr.
Date: 101600
Re: Policing Concerns, Unbank, Check cashing locations
I checked with the police departments in the cities with Unbank locations after our
conversation on 101200.
The Minneapolis Police Department reports approximately 125 calls for service to the
five Minneapolis locations in the last four years. 22 calls for service are shown for
calendar year 2000.
The St. Paul Police Department reports 123 calls for service at the Unbank location
on University Ave. over the last three years. They have responded to 50 calls for
service there this year. They have no record of the St. Peter St. location and believe it
must be very new.
The Anoka Police Department reports 20 call for service to their Unbank location this
year.
The Waite Park Police Department has had six calls for service to the Unbank in their
city this year.
Minneapolis and St. Paul report that the bulk of calls for service are for forgeries and
frauds. Neither of these cities reported the number of alarms they responded to at the
Unbank locations. I believe the number of alarms would also be significant.
In conclusion I would observe that the Unbank locations in the metropolitan area
generate a higher than average level of criminal activity and the commensurate
number of calls for service.
• Page 1
p
4
491NA,r
i
oe
REPORURECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Craig Larsen
City Planner
Date: May 15, 2001
Subject:
Preliminary Plat Approval.
Grandview Square 2 "d Addn.
Recommendation:
Agenda Item: Iv. B.
Consent ❑
Information Only F-1
Mgr. Recommends ❑
To HRA
®
To Council
Action: ❑
Motion
®
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
The Planning Commission recommends preliminary plat approval for Grandview
Square 2nd Addition.
Info /Background:
See attached Planning Commission minutes; staff report and preliminary plat.
.a
LOCATION MAP
1 I I l 1 W. 49
BLVD.
a 3 ~
'90
CIT
eL ST W HAL
Sy M ° = o 'PC
' c ° =ODE
° y • as
CUR X ■�- 'ate°
° a Y EDINA
x PUBLIC \
i Ix WORKS f V
m CENTER
�T.
W 52ND ST � o
I C
lK
1 D O k Ee � ■ ° �� ,
I;
-
■
s • • ■ ■ `
° ■■ 1 •' t
°0 'i■ r S ii■' OUR LADY
a ■••■ �•• ■• :tif
e • . • . ■� :. OF GRACE +Ile
J W ■ ■ •
CATHOLIC SCHOOL � :?
cDENHOCR ST
ICH U
s:, O
N O 9�
0 RICHµO
RICNW00 0 �
wIND50R AV. LAifF'''
IN
A
SUBDIVISION
NUMBER S -01 -4
L O C A T 10 N South of Eden Avenue and west of the.
Canadian Pacific Railroad Tracks
REQUEST Phase II Grandview
EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DRAFT MINUTES P.C. APRIL 25, 2001
S -01-4 Preliminary Plat Approval
Grandview Square 2 "d Addition
Phase II
Mr. Larsen informed the Commission the attached preliminary plat
represents Phase II of the redevelopment at Grandview Square. Phase I, now
underway included the office building, the first condominium building and the
park square. Phase II includes lots for the second condo building, the
library/senior center and a reconfigured Sherwood park.
Mr. Larsen explained the plat for Grandview Square 2 "d Addition includes
three properties not included in the Phase I plat. Those properties are the Edina
pet hospital, the Classic Hair Salon, and the Noonan office building. The HRA is
acquiring the three properties through eminent domain.
Mr. Larsen concluded the proposed plat is consistent with the approved
Overall Development Plan for the Grandview Square development. Staff
recommends approval of the proposed preliminary plat.
After a brief discussion Commissioner Byron moved to recommend
preliminary plat approval. Commissioner Lonsbury seconded the motion. All
voted aye; motion carried.
EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION
APRIL 25, 2001
STAFF REPORT
S -01-4 Preliminary Plat Approval
Grandview Square 2 "d Addition
Phase II
The attached preliminary plat represents phase 2 of the redevelopment at
Grandview Square. Phase 1, now underway included the office building, the first
condominium building and the park square. Phase 2 includes lots for the second
condo building, the library/senior center and a reconfigured Sherwood park.
The plat for Grandview Square 2 "d Addition includes three properties not
included in the phase 1 plat. Those properties are the Edina pet hospital, the
Classic Hair Salon, and the Noonan office building. The HRA is acquiring the
three properties through eminent domain.
RECOMMENDATION:
The proposed plat is consistent with the approved Overall Development
Plan for the Grandview Square development. Staff recommends approval of the
proposed preliminary plat.
i.
Pi
FROM:
VIA:
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
Mayor & City Council
Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works
Gordon Hughes, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000
DATE: 15 May 2001
AGENDA ITEM V. A.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Sanitary sewer Lift Station Improvements, Improvement Nos. LS -23, LS -24,
LS -25, Contract No. 01- 04(ENG).
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
1. Barbarossa & Sons 1. $ 288,787.00
2. Gridor Construction, Inc. 2. $ 428,238.50
3. 3.
4. 4.
5. 5•
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Barbarossa & Sons
$ 288,787.00
GENERAL INFORMATION: This project is for the replacement of two existing mid- 1960's
sanitary sewer lift stations located at 5557 West 78th Street and at 4712 Meadow Road and
also for the rehabilitation of a 1973 sanitary sewer lift station located at 5143 Eden Avenue.
The project will be funded from utility funds. The Utility Department's Five — year Capital
Improvement Plan budgeted $375,000.00 for these lift station improvements, our Engineer's
Estimate is $200,472.50. Staff feels that the bids taken for these improvements are valid and
Staff recommends awarding this project.
C
c z Public Works - Engineering
Signaturi Department
1
not within budget ohn Wall' , Finance Director
-dordon Hughes, Ci y nager
The Recommended Bid is
within budget
TO:
FROM:
VIA:
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
Mayor & City Council
Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works
Gordon Hughes, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000
DATE: 15 May 2001 AGENDA ITEM V. B.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: W. 78`" Street - BA -314 / T.H. 169 Frontage Road - BA -317.
Company
1. Shafer Construction
2. Eureka Contractors
3. Arnt Construction
4. Hardrives, Inc.
5. C.S. McCrossan
6. S.M. Hentges
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Shafer Construction.
Amount of Quote or Bid
1. $ 2,219,344.15
2. $ 2,282,513.05
3. $ 2,306,440.19
4. $ 2,319,106.15
5. $ 2,343,821.74
6. $2,378,734.52
$ 2,219,344.25
GENERAL INFORMATION: This bid was for the reconstruction of W. 78th Street from the
railroad bridge to 200 feet west of Gleason Road and a new frontage road along the east side
of T.H. 169 from W. 78th to Braemar Arena. These projects are financed by the municipal gas
tax funds from Bloomington and Edina for W. 78th Street and from Edina for the frontage road.
These projects are part of a joint powers a reement with Bloomington. The award should be
subject to review by Bloomington for W. 78 h Street. The Engineer's Estimate is $2,332,392.25.
I
Signatu5d
The Recommended Bid is ix
within budget not within budget
Public Works - Engineering
n, Finance Director
TO:
FROM:
VIA:
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
Mayor & City Council
Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works
Gordon Hughes, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000
DATE: 15 MAY 2001
ITEM. DESCRIPTION: One Skid Steer Loader
Company
1. St. Joseph Equipment (State Contract # 426299)
2.
3.
4.
5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
St. Joseph Equipment
GENERAL INFORMATION:
AGENDA ITEM V. C.
Amount of Quote or Bid
1. $44,001.54
2.
3.
4.
5.
$ 44,001.54
This purchase is for a skid steer loader (small) to replace existing 1991 skid steer loader, Unit No. 25-
411. This purchase is made through the cooperative purchasing program with the State of Minnesota.
The funds for this purchase are from the Equipment Replacement Schedule Funds in the Street
Department.
Signatu e
The Recommended Bid is 1
within budget
not within
Public Works - Streets
Department
�kw
lin, Finance Director
a
w9�N�1r
Y
o e '
REPORURECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # Vi. A
From: Vincent Bongaarts'� Consent ❑.
Traffic Safety Coordinator Information Only ❑
Date: 15 May 2001 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
Subject: Attached Traffic Safety ® TO Council
Minutes Action ® Motion
❑ Resolution
❑ Ordinance
❑ Discussion
Recommendation: Review and approve Traffic Safety Minutes
Info /Background: See Attached
TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW
TUESDAY, MAY 1, 2001
The staff review of traffic safety matters occurred on May 1, 2001. Staff present
included the City Planner, Police Chief, City Engineer, Public Works Traffic Control
Specialist, Sgt. Larson from the Police Dept. and, the Traffic Safety Coordinator.
From that review, the below recommendations are provided. On each of the items,
persons involved have been contacted and the staff recommendation has been
discussed with them. They have also been informed that if they disagree with the
recommendation or have additional facts to present, they can be included on the
May 15, 2001, Council Agenda.
SECTION A:
Requests on which the staff recommends approval.
The requestor who is a resident of the Sunnyslope area feels that the residents
and visitors to area need some kind of advisement encouraging them to slow
down when entering that neighborhood. Requestor feels that vehicles entering
need to be told or reminded that there are children and other pedestrians also
using the streets and they need to use some caution. The requestor feels this
can be done with some signing at the two entrances to the neighborhood and a
letter from the City to all the residents advising them to drive safely.
This area has only two entrance /exits that are at W. 50th St. One is east
Sunnyslope Rd. and the other is Dale Ave. There are no sidewalks in this
area and the street tends to be somewhat hilly with curves but with good
visibility;
There have been no accidents reported in this entire area from 1/1/97 to
12/31/00.
A traffic survey was done on East Sunnyslope that had an ADT of 327 vehicles
Monday through Friday and an 85 percentile speed of 31 mph.
The staff recommends that a letter be sent out to the Sunnyslope area residents
regarding safe driving. The staff however denies the request for signing at the
two entrances to the neighborhood.
TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW
May 1, 2001
Page 2
2. On September 19, 2000, the Edina City Council approved a two hour parking
restriction for the west side of the 6100 block of Wooddale that would start just
south of the east driveway for the apartment building at 4545 Valley View Road
and continue to the south for 125 feet. This would be done on a six -month
temporary experimental basis to be evaluated at the end of that time for whether
or not it should be permanent.
The staff has received no negative communications regarding this parking
situation and recommends that the two hour parking south of the east driveway
of 4545 Valley View Road in the 6100 block of Wooddale be continued on a
permanent basis.
3. A request was made for a 'No Passing" sign along with double yellow striping on
West 66th between Cornelia Drive and Westshore Drive.
This request was first received in August 2000. At that time the request was
recommended by the staff for denial as the staff felt there was no evidence to
indicate a problem. No one on the staff ever recalled seeing anyone passing in
this location. Since that time it's been learned that there is passing occurring on
a somewhat regular basis at this location.
The requestor feels that when a car passes another car in that location it
becomes a dangerous situation due to the close proximity of pedestrians using
the walkway between the lakes and the lack of space for a car to take evasive
action if needed.
West 66th Street between Westshore Drive and Cornelia Drive has a 35 mph
speed limit. There is an average daily traffic (ADT) of 5,800 vehicles.
There have been no accidents reported on W. 66th St. between Westshore Drive
and Cornelia Drive from 1/1/97 to 12/31/00.
A speed survey done in June 1999 involving 17,668 vehicles put the 85th
percentile speed at 41 mph for 35 mph zone. Five hundred sixty -eight or 3.2 %
of the vehicles were at 45 mph.
The staff recommends creating a no passing zone by painting double yellow
lines from Westshore Drive to Cornelia Circle on West 66th Street.
SECTION B:
Requests on which the staff recommends denial of request.
TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW
May 1, 2001
Page 3
1. Request for some kind of signing where Arthur meets Waterman. Requestor
feels the traffic needs some kind of advisement to slow down when making the
right angle turn from Arthur to Waterman. Requestor feels the traffic is coming
around the corner too fast creating a hazard for children and other pedestrians in
this area. The source of this problem is apparently the construction personnel
working on the new additions located on Waterman and people unfamiliar with
the area coming to look at the new additions.
Waterman and Arthur at this location are actually a combination dead end street
with entrance at Maloney Ave. onto Arthur St. and then a right angle turn to
Waterman which dead ends a couple of blocks further. Normally there is only
local traffic.
There are no sidewalks in this area. There have been no accidents reported from
1/1/97 to 12/31/00.
It would be very difficult to slow down for the turn which is a very definite right
angle turn. Also directly across from the turn is a three level retaining wall
allowing no one anyplace to go but to the right.
The staff will have the building inspectors contact the contractors regarding this
situation however, recommend denial of the request for any additional signing at
this location.
2. A request for stop signs on Ewing at W. 61St and /or on Chowen Curve.
The requestor feels that the speed of vehicles on Ewing is too fast and the stop
signs at both or at least one of the intersections would help slow down the cars.
The requestor lives on Ewing between the two intersections. The requestor is
concerned for the safety of his children. He further related that his children who
were on bikes had some kind for confrontation with a motorist and he is pursuing
charges against that driver through the Police Department.
West 61St St. and Chowen Curve at Ewing are both 'T' type intersections with
very little traffic entering Ewing Ave. There are no sidewalks in this area. Ewing
Ave. is a wide -open street with no visibility problems.
There have been no accidents reported on Ewing Ave. from W. 62nd St. to W.
60th St. between 1/1/97 and 12/31/00. This includes the intersections of W. 61St
St. and Chowen Curve.
A traffic survey done 4/10/01 to 4/17/01 showed a Monday through Friday daily
average traffic of 311 vehicles. The 85th percentile speed was 31.8 mph. There
TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW
May 1, 2001
Page 4
were 10 or .6% of the 1555 vehicles surveyed at 40 + mph. Traffic on this street
is all local traffic.
The requestor made the same request on 2/25/98.
A traffic survey done in April 1998 showed a Monday through Friday ADT of 290
vehicles (21 fewer than this year's survey) and an 85 percentile speed of 30.1
mph (1.7 mph slower than this year's survey). Request was denied at that time
for lack of warrant.
This area will be referred to the Police Department for speed education purposes
along with the speed display trailer.
The staff recommends denial of the request for stop signs for lack of warrant.
3. A request for stop signs on Mirror Lakes Drive at Northwood.
Requestor feels the signs are needed to slow traffic down on Mirror Lakes Drive
and subsequently enhance the safety of children and other pedestrians in the
area.
Northwood Drive has stop signs at Mirror Lakes Drive. There are no sidewalks in
this area requiring pedestrians to share the roadway with the vehicles.
Several traffic surveys have been done in this area in the past, the most recent in
April of this year.
The average daily Monday through Friday traffic for those surveys were:
2001 - ADT 551 vehicles
1999 - ADT 605 vehicles
1997 - ADT 570 vehicle
1996 - ADT 600 vehicles
Speed surveys were also done in those four years,
85 percentile speeds were:
2001 - 33 mph
1999 - 32 mph
1997 - 33 mph
1996 - 35 mph
There have been no accidents reported in this area from 1/1/97 to 12/31/00.
This area will be referred to the Police Department for speed education purposes
along with the speed display trailer.
TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW
May 1, 2001
Page 5
The staff recommends denial of the request for stop signs for lack of any
warrant.
4. A request for stop signs on West 56th St. at Woodland Circle.
Requestor feels the stop signs are needed to slow down the traffic on West 56th
St. Requestor would also like speed limit signs posted. The requestor says that
the speeding vehicles create a safety hazard for the children in the area.
W. 56th St. is a very minor collector street for the local traffic coming to and from
France Ave. The Monday through Friday average daily traffic is 882 vehicles.
Saturday's traffic is higher than most of the weekdays at approximately 915
vehicles. Traffic entering W. 56th St. from Woodland circle is very light.
A speed survey was done from 4/10/01 to 4/17/01. The Monday through Friday
85th percentile speed was 32 mph. Of the 4410 vehicles in the survey 31, or .7%
were at 40 + mph.
There are no sidewalks in this area.
There have been no accidents reported from 1/1/97 to 12/31/00.
The speed display trailer will be scheduled for this location.
The staff recommends denial of the stop signs for lack of any warrant.
SECTION C:
Requests which are deferred to a later date or referred to others.
1. A request to study pedestrian safety in crossing York Ave. between the bus
stops at 7200 York on the east side of York. There is no pedestrian crosswalk in
this area. York Ave has a wide grassy island at this location with two lanes of
one -way traffic on each side. The speed limit is 35 mph in each direction with a
high volume of traffic. This is also a Hennepin County road. The staff is
continuing this request for further study.
2. A request for "no parking' restrictions in the curve at Ridgeview Rd. and W. 63rd
St. has been continued for further study by staff.
z
TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW
May 1, 2001
Page 6
3. Two inquiries have been received by the Mayor and the City Manager regarding
the intersection of Valley View Rd. and Braemar Blvd.
Both inquiries regarded the intersection as confusing and in need of
reconfiguration to make the intersection less hazardous.
This intersection has had 7 accidents from 1/1/97 to 12/31/00.
This intersection has been referred to the City Engineering Department for
evaluation regarding a reconfiguration. The Engineering Dept. has said that any
reconstruction of the intersection would be required due to grades and
geometrics of the area.
Sometime this year the City will begin to build a new frontage road that will go
from Valley View Rd. at Hwy. 169 south along the east side of Hwy. 169 and
west of the Braemar golf course to the northeast corner of the intersection at 1-
494 and Hwy. 169 and then go east along the north side of 1-494 and south of
the golf course where it will hook up with West 78" St. It is felt that this frontage
road will cut down on the traffic presently using Valley View Rd. and Braemar
Blvd. as a shortcut to areas east and south of Edina.
Upon completion of that frontage road the Engineering Dept. will take a further
look at the intersection of Valley Veiw Rd. and Braemar Blvd. and hopefully
come to a solution that would clarify use of the intersection.
Both of the parties making the inquiries were contacted regarding the situation at
Valley View Rd. and Braemar Blvd.
4. The Edina Country Club traffic committee is continuing to meet to discuss their
traffic situation and options available to them.
7
r�
° e REPORURECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
From: David Velde
City Sanitarian
Date: May 15, 2001
Subject:
Resolution Supporting
Restrictions on the Use and
Sale of Phosphorous Lawn
Fertilizers
Recommendation:
Agenda Item: VI. B.
Consent
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑
To HRA
®
To Council
Action: ❑
Motion
®
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Adopt a resolution supporting legislation restricting the sale of lawn fertilizer
containing phosphorous.
Info /Background:
The City of Shorewood is seeking support from local units of government to
restrict the availability of lawn fertilizer containing phosphorous. Legislation was
introduced in the 2001 session but did not have a hearing prior to the March 31, 2001,
deadline. An effort to move this legislation through the next session will continue and
they are asking support from cities, counties and watershed districts.
Soil tests have shown that most lawns do not need extra phosphorous and most
of the phosphorous applied to lawns runs off into the street and ends up in our streams,
ponds, and wetlands contributing to algae blooms in these water bodies. The
legislation being proposed would prohibit the sale of fertilizer containing phosphorous.
There would be provisions to allow limited sale of fertilizer containing phosphorous for
newly established lawns and yards where soil samples show a need for extra
phosphorous.
So far, 30 cities, counties and watershed districts have passed resolution
supporting this legislation.
RESOLUTION NO. 2001-30
A RESOLUTION RELATING TO RESTRICTIONS ON THE USE
AND SALE OF PHOSPHOROUS LAWN FERTILIZERS
WHEREAS, The City of Edina is tributary to significant fresh water
resources; and
WHEREAS, there has long been established a well- documented
relationship between the use of phosphorous lawn fertilizers and the degradation
of water quality; and
WHEREAS, as a matter of policy, the City of Edina desires to reduce the
consumption and use of phosphorous lawn fertilizers; and
WHEREAS, subject to unique circumstances, regional soil conditions have
an abundance of natural phosphorous; and
WHEREAS, industry leading fertilizer manufacturers and retailers have
failed to produce and market low phosphorous lawn fertilizers to the public; and
WHEREAS, over two decades of public education has had minimal effect
when in competition with corporate advertising and their refusal to formulate to
local needs; and
WHEREAS, the City of Edina finds it important to encourage the reduction
in the use of phosphorous lawn fertilizers within the City; and
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Edina supports
legislation restricting sale of any lawn fertilizer, liquid or granular, that contains
any amount of phosphorous or other compounds containing phosphorous, such
as phosphate, except, small quantities may be sold when a soil test indicates
added phosphorous is needed to support healthy turf growth, or during the first
year when new area or turf is being established. In addition, displays of lawn
fertilizer containing phosphorous shall be limited to ten percent of the quantity of
non - phosphorous lawn'fertilizer on display at any given time.
BE IT RUTHER RESOLVED, the City Council of Edina does request and
encourage its state legislative delegation to consider and enact legislation to
regulate and limit the use and sale of phosphorous lawn fertilizers.
ADOPTED by the City of Edina this day of , 2001.
ATTEST:
Administrator
Chair
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Francis Hoffman ,101
City Engineer
Date: 15 May 2001
Subject: Indian Way West
Sound Abatement Petition
Along McCauley Trail
T.H. 169 — Imp. No. SA -2
Agenda Item # vi. c
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
® To Council
Action ❑ Motion
® Resolution
❑ Ordinance
Discussion
Recommendation: Authorize bids and special assessment hearing based on a
100% petition from Indian Way West residents for Improvement Project No. SA -2.
Info /Background:
The five homeowners petitioned the City of Edina to consider constructing a
sound abatement wall along McCauley Trail adjacent to T.H. 169. The City received
their petition at the last meeting on May 3, 2001.
The residents' request was to include their neighborhood in the current project
north of Brenden Glen plat. Staff has reviewed the feasibility of the request and
believes it can be kept within the timelines of the first project if the residents waive their
right to the initial hearing because of the 100% petition. For staff to continue to stay on
the timeline, City Council would need to authorize the bids and setting the special
assessment hearing subject to the neighbors providing a waiver prior to the June 5th
meeting. Staff would recommend the above by resolution.
Also, funding alternatives are still alive at the State Legislature. Obviously, staff
would recommend a restructure of these projects if State money becomes available. By
the June 5th meeting the City will know the answer for this session.
;y
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Wayne Houle, PE 46V4
Assist. Public Works Director
Date: May 15, 2001
Subject: Receive Feasibility Study
and Set Public Hearing for:
Alley Improvement A -193:
5200 block between Halifax
Avenue and Minnehaha
Avenue.
Recommendation:
Set hearing date of June 5, 2001
Info /Background:
Agenda Item #
VI.D.
Consent
Information Only
❑
Mgr. Recommends
❑ To HRA
® To Council
Action
® Motion
® Resolution
❑ Ordinance
❑
Discussion
The City was petitioned by five of seven residents for an alley improvement project in the
5200 block between Halifax Avenue and Minnehaha Avenue. This improvement project
would be an extension of an existing alley that enters off of West 52nd Street. This project
will be funded through the Special Assessment process as per Chapter 429 of the State
Statutes. Staff has review this project and feels it is feasible. Staff would suggest a
public hearing date for this project of June 5, 2001.
w91N A.,jam FEASIBILITY STUDY — A193
o� G, ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Cn
�0 CITY OF EDINA
• bnwnw''O
ALLEY IMPROVEMENTS
5200 BLOCK OF HALIFAX AVENUE AND MINNEHAHA BOULEVARD
May 15, 2001
LOCATION: 5200 block between Halifax Avenue and Minnehaha Avenue.
LOCATION MAP
INITIATION & ISSUES: This project was initiated by a petition from five neighbors adjacent to the
unimproved alley area. The residents would like to access their properties
from this alley -way. One resident along Minnehaha Boulevard has express an
oposition to any improvements to this alley -way.
XISTING CONDITIONS: The existing alley from West 52nd Street to approximately 440 feet south
consists of a 12 foot wide improved bituminous surface. The topography
along the alley way is rather level as you enter the alley then slopes gradually
upward to the proposed extension.
Feasibility Study A193
ALLEY EXTENSION — Halifax Aved Minnehaha Blvd.
May 15, 2001
Page 2
IMPROVEMENT
Extend the alley by excavating 11 inches of material and placing 3 inches of
bituminous over 8 inches of a base aggregate. One tree will need to be
removed along the westerly side of the alley extension.
` XT
# 5201 4207 1/ 1
1 5 .5204 5205
5203 1
` 1•
d • 521'2 52!3
Q
2
PROPOSED ALLEY EXTENSION
RIGHT -OF -WAY: Adequate right -of -way exists for the alley improvement.
FEASIBILITY: This project is feasible from an Engineering / City standpoint.
EASEMENTS: No easements required.
COMPLETION: 2001 Construction Season
ASSESSMENTS: A special assessment of approximately $2,200 per assessable lot will be
levied against the properties adjacent to the proposed
alley extension. See
preliminary assessment role below:
PROPERTY ID HOUSE STREET NAME
UNIT
ASSESSMENT
NUMBER
COST
1802824440085 5229 MINNEHAHA BLVD
1.00
$
2,154.61
1802824440084 5233 MINNEHAHA BLVD
1.00
$
2,154.61
1802824440082 5241 MINNEHAHA BLVD
1.00
$
2,154.61
1802824440061 5228 HALIFAX AVE
1.00
$
2,154.61
1802824440062 5240 HALIFAX AVE
1.00
$
2,154.61
1802824440063 5236 HALIFAX AVE
1.00
$
2,154.61
1802824440064 5232 HALIFAX AVE
1.00
$
2,154.61
TOTAL
7
$
15,082.25
Feasibility Study A193
ALLEY EXTENSION — Halifax Ave./ Minnehaha Blvd.
May 15, 2001
Page 3
PROJECT COSTS: The total estimated project cost is $15,100 and includes indirect costs of
22.5 %, which includes engineering, clerical, and finance costs. Funding for
the project will be from special assessments. See summary of the Project
Cost Estimate below.
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST $ 12,200.00
15% ENGINEERING & CLERICAL $ 1,830.00
SUBTOTAL PROJECT COST $ 14,030.00
7.5% FINANCE COST $ 1,052.25
TOTAL PROJECT COST $ 15,082.25
PROJECT SCHEDULE: The following schedule is feasible from an Engineering standpoint:
Council Orders Public Hearing ........ ............................... May 15, 2001
Receive Feasibility Report .............. ............................... May 15, 2001
Public Hearing ...... ............................... ...........................June 5, 2001
BidOpening ......................................... ............................... July, 2001
AwardContract .................................... ............................... July, 2001
Begin Construction ......................... ............................... August, 2001
Complete Construction ................... ............................... August, 2001
IN) REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To:
Mayor & City Council
From:
Fran Hoffman, PE
Public Works Director / it
Engineer J�
Date:
May 15, 2001
Subject:
Approve traffic signal
upgrade and intersection
improvements for:
Traffic Signal Improvement
No. TS -032 — West 76th
Street and York Avenue.
Recommendation:
Agenda Item # VI. E.
Consent
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends
Action
❑ToHRA
® To Council
® Motion
® Resolution
❑ Ordinance
❑ Discussion
If the Council determines the project to be warranted and necessary, Council shall adopt a
resolution approving Traffic Signal Upgrade / Improvement TS -032, authorize plans and
specifications to be completed and bids taken.
Info /Background:
This project was initiated by the Integrated Corridor Traffic Management (ICTM) project as
an identified intersection improvement need. ICTM is a cooperative ongoing project
between the agencies of Bloomington, Richfield, Edina, Minnesota Department of
Transportation, and Hennepin County, that provides adaptive traffic control along both
sides of 1-494 between West 24th Avenue and East Bush Lake Road, see attached ICTM
layout. The existing signalized intersection needs to be upgraded to include additional
eastbound to northbound left turn lane, an additional southbound to eastbound left turn
lane, and an additional westbound to southbound left turn lane. See attached intersection'
layout.
The estimated project cost is $286,500. Funding for this project would be from the
Municipal State Aid System, commonly known as the gas tax funds and the City of Edina
Utility Fund.
Staff analyzed the project and feels that the project is feasible from an engineering
standpoint. Staff is also recommending to bid this project out with three previously
approved signal projects.
PLAN SYMBOLS
`;x: : :::.::::::: - - -
O-=== = =_ = ==
8li$
....... W
UTILITY SYMBOLS
s Nn #
I , u �.. oN•mnN�' m
m
� a.0
..rac.a •� a � a—
CITY OF ]EDINA
HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA
CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR
GRADING, AGGREGATE BASE, BITUMINOUS PAVING, DRAINAGE,
UTILITY CONSTRUCTION, TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND MISC. CONSTRUCTION
S.A.P. NO. 120 - 136 -15 / S.A.P. NO. 120- 020 -33 / S.A.P. NO. 120-030 -004
W. 76TH ST. / YORK AVENUE S. (CSAH 3WINTERSECTIONS OF W. 77TH ST.
AT COMPUTER AVE. AND INTERSECTION OF 77TH ST. AT PARKLAWN AVE.
CITY OF EDINA IMPROVEMENT NO. TS-25. TS -26. TS -27. TS -32
S.AP. 120 - 136 -15 CITY OF EDINA CONTRACT NO. 01 -2 (ENG) S.A.P. 120 - 020 -33
LOCATED ON N!:_ 7.. 6. T. H... S. T. RE. E7 ............ ............................... LOCATED ON X ARK ...............
FROM .EQ!NdQRQ.V.GH.._ WAY ....... TO.. J� .Q...FT...E:..Q.F....YQ.R&A..E. S. FROM ..0.9 ES._5,..Q.E._Z.6.TH...51. T0.. 5Q. Q ...F.T...N.,.QF....76T.H...ST..
GROSS LENGTH._ ...............1072 „FT GROSS LENGTH..................- MS..FT '
BRIDGES-LENGTH ..........:..........G.PT BRDGES-LENGEX .....................G -IT
E. CEPTIONS •LENGTn ................00..F T EKCEPTIONS -LENCTn................VV_FT
NET LENGTH .......................IOIi..FT R24W NET LENGTH ........................ 60!_FT
100 II
MINNESOTA AR• u
57, vURG z R. 3 >
u 7 r
BLOOMINGTON
W a 781h
BONN `
W �T2nd
PROJECT LOCATION BEGIN S.AP. 120-
SIGNAL SYSTEM "B•' STA. 100.00.0
S.A.P. 120-030-004 PROJECT LOCATION
� v
I.�I 4I 62nd let
ST. STA. 110.72.4
OIION DR.
120- 020 -33 SCALES
PLAN 50
INDEX MAP NO SCAL
PROJECT LOCATION
COUNTY: HENNEPIN
METRO DIVISION
GOVERNING SPECIFICATIONS:
- ANDARRDES —TA vE�n G FM —1-- s i u comma rArcN
msnc CDHTIIDL Df
DEMOS Am sl9mlD vIA(L toH'aIM f0
TiuueMl IDP T�DIORMW l <Cb fROI C l� IW
DAZED MNUMY.2001
INDEX
SHEET NO. DESCRIPTION
1
2
S.A.P. 12o -o30 -004 PROJECT LOCATION
3
SIGNAL SYSTEMS "A” AND "D" AND
4
ROADWAY WIDENING ON W. 76TH ST.
S
AND YORK AVENUE S.
8
7
S.AP. 120- 136 -15 6 120 - 020 -33
8.9
DESIGN DATA DESIGN DATA
D
W. 76TH ST. YORK AVE. S.
n -12
S.AP. 120- 136.15 S.A.P. 120-020 -33
R -VALUE
75 75
ACT 2001
10,500
ADT 2021
FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION _
1
)
NO. OF TRAFFIC LANES
PREFORMED NON - METALLIC CONDUIT LOOP DETECTOR
SIGMA N 10 (20)
DESIGN SPEED
BASED ON SIGHT DISTANCE
1
M H M
!HEIGHT OF EYE
EOUPMENT PAD DETALS
HEIGHT OF OBJECT
EOUIPMEM PAID DETAILS
ST. STA. 110.72.4
OIION DR.
120- 020 -33 SCALES
PLAN 50
INDEX MAP NO SCAL
PROJECT LOCATION
COUNTY: HENNEPIN
METRO DIVISION
GOVERNING SPECIFICATIONS:
- ANDARRDES —TA vE�n G FM —1-- s i u comma rArcN
msnc CDHTIIDL Df
DEMOS Am sl9mlD vIA(L toH'aIM f0
TiuueMl IDP T�DIORMW l <Cb fROI C l� IW
DAZED MNUMY.2001
INDEX
SHEET NO. DESCRIPTION
1
2
TITLE SHEET
STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED QUANTITIES
3
GENERAL LAYOUT
4
COTSTRUCTIONNSDLS NOTES. STD. PLATES AND
EMT IVORK TARIAATDN AND SUMMARY
S
ALIGNMENT PLAN AND TABULATION
8
7
TYPICAL SECTIONS
EIMSTNG. TOPOGRAPHY. UTLITY AND REMOVAL PLAN
8.9
CONSTRUCTION PLAN AND PROFILE
D
MISCELLANEOUS DETAILS
n -12
STAGING RANG
13
51GNNG AND STRIPING PLAN
u -18
EROSION NTROL STANDARD PLANS
CO
19
SIGNAL PLAN DETAILS
20
PREFORMED NON - METALLIC CONDUIT LOOP DETECTOR
21
SIGNAL SERVICE DETAILS
22
EOUPMENT PAD DETALS
23
EOUIPMEM PAID DETAILS
24
INTERSECTIDN LAYOUT (SYSTEM -w•I
25
INTERCONNECT LAYOUT '
26
FELD WIRING DIAGRAM (SYSTEM "A -1
27
INTERSECTION LAYOUT (SYSTEM -B-I
28
FELD WIIPNG DIAGRAM (SYSTEM 'Ir"
29
INTERSECTKON LAYOUT ISYSTIM -C -1
30
FELD 7086 DIAGRAM ISYSTEM "C")
31
INTERSECTION LAYOUT (SYSTEM -C-I
32
FELD WIRING DMGRANCSYSTEM 'TY')
33
INTERCONNECT LAYOUT
34.38
(FOR INFO. ONLY) -
39
MAST ARM SIGN DETAILS
40
MAST ARM SIGN DETAILS
41 -50
CROSS SECTIONS
THIS PLAN CONTAINS SO SHEETS
IREBY CERIFY THAT THS KAH — PREPMED BY ME NI
EN NY DAECI SuPEAVISOH Aa41 —T I AM •DULY LCE16L0
NNDFES— —NE. 1PD[R INE LAWS OI TIE STATE 0I MANE —
PRINT NAME: y R
.�M� �u- 1�D,E_\ Tvr• Y��r
ENCR. N/'a+"� � """"
L;ceDce . 4otzo pD11 4I to12E2o\
CONSULTING
GROUP, INC.
APPROVED:
CITY OF EDNA Bi—M i DATE
APPROVED:
HENNEPIN COUNTY ENGNEER DATE
RECOMMENDED FOR MPROV&:
RAN REVISIONS
OAlE SIFT N0. APPROVED BY
STATE AID PROJECT NOS. 120-136-15.12
CITY OF EDINA IMPROVEMENT NO. TS-25, TS -26.
METRO-AS SISIANT DIVISION ENGINEER -STATE AD; DATE
REVIEWED FOR COMPUM+CE WITH STATE AD
RLES/POLICY
APPROVED FOR STATE AD FUDK' DATE
STATE ND ENGINEER
-33.120-0. 4
TS- 32SHEET Nu. L OF 50 SHEETS
f
1 0
:,
>
CC.%
ON RELOCATED LIGHT POST
-D
C
G
N 76TH
" ... ".
LIN
GE
ON RELOCATIO LIGHT P057
PT I
'I r r
GLICER.I. NOTE
COMP ICTING PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE REMOVED
TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGIIKER.
NOTESI
ORE LINE WHITE 110' STRIPE WITH
30' CAP;-EPDXY
:: OXEN LINE YELLOW CIO- STRIPE WITH 30' CAP)-EPDXY
SOLI: LINE MITE-EPDXY
4' S
SOLID
OD 4- LINE YELLOW-EPDXT
(D 6- Sam LINE MITE-EPDXY
4- DOUBLE SOLID LINE TELLOW-EPDXT
ZEBRA CROSSIIALX MITE-EPDXY
ON PAVEMENT MESSAGE IRIMT ARROII-EPDXY
OI PAVEMENT MESSAGE ILEFT ARROWC-EPDXT
Q 24- SOLID LINE TIELLOW-EPDXT 20- SPACING D.C.
0 45 DEGREES
IIIIIIIII
--- - ---
O PAVEMENT MESSAGE CONLYI-EPDXY
Z
INSTALL SALVAGED SIGN PANEL TYPE C
r
Jr
0
ON MEW SIGNAL PED
12 11111111
YORK AVE. 5.
pq
L
0
ON NEW SIGNAL
PEDEST AL
@
.9
STAGE A" PROWECT NO, DRAWN By DATE
1136-0 v_jmff_ QL_m
CITY OF E
SHEET
n:33
'1.31 004
DESIGNED BY
-01
M. TURNER q2
CONSULTING SIGNING AND STF AN
2p
D 1APPRI
CNEC.ED a,
NO. 02-01
GROUP, INC. YORK AVE. S. ICSAH 31 ST T6TH ST.
OF
;::tl;
vieg
NAME: 4058mt� fb. 23. 2001
S-26. CS-2T.
-zm M21g-.
TS-32 COHN. M.
50
0
Y
J
z
a
m
80th St
Edina
Richfield
o
m
v
a
}
U
�
4
Z
76th St "
K
I th st
a
77th St
N
�---
�
....----- - - - - --
AL
i asa
80th St
Bloomington
79th St
North
INTEGRATED CORRIDOR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT
ROUTE
Richfield
v
}
S
4
Z
d
K
I th st
v
N
Bloomington
79th St
North
INTEGRATED CORRIDOR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT
ROUTE
Dan Patch public open houses set for May 30 and 31 Page 1 of 2
AGENDA ITEM: XI.A.
Dan Patch public open houses set for May 30 and 31
The second series of public open houses for the state - funded Dan Patch Commuter Rail
Feasibility Study has been scheduled for late May. Ridership forecast figures, cost
estimates, preliminary environmental screening information, finalized station concepts and
identified passing siding locations will be the primary topics.
For citizens of Hennepin County a public open house is scheduled for Wednesday, May
30, from 5 p.m. to 8 p.m., at Thomas Jefferson Senior High School, Lunch Room,
4201 West 102nd Street, Bloomington. For citizens of Dakota, Scott and Rice Counties a
public open house is scheduled for Thursday, May 31, from 5 p.m. to 8 p.m., at the
Lakeville Water Treatment Facility Community Room, 18400 Ipava Avenue (two miles
east of 1 -35 and north of 185th Street/County Road 60).
The public houses will continue with the "personal interaction style" used in the initial set of
open houses held last fall. The Study's consulting team, Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade &
Douglas, will provide displays of the primary topics: ridership, estimated costs,
environmental screening, station concepts and passing sidings. The information provided
will answer the questions of how many people are anticipated to use the train, and where
they are coming from. Also, locations and concept drawings for potential commuter rail
stations and areas of new track locations will be presented. In addition, environmental
issues requiring future study will be identified. Staff members and Dan Patch Technical and
Policy Committee members will be present to answer questions throughout the duration of
the open houses.
The Dan Patch Commuter Rail Feasibility Study is evaluating the feasibility of re-
establishing commuter rail service on existing railroad tracks from Northfield, through the
cities of Lakeville, Burnsville, Savage, Bloomington, Edina, and St. Louis Park, to
Minneapolis. In Dakota, Scott and Rice Counties, the rail corridor under consideration is
between Northfield and Savage. In Hennepin County, the rail corridor is west of
Normandale Boulevard /Highway 100 and connects with downtown Minneapolis in the 1 -394
corridor. Commuter rail is a passenger rail service linking city, suburban and rural locations
using diesel - powered trains on existing track.
The Dan Patch Corridor Commuter Rail Feasibility Study is being directed and coordinated
by The 1 -35W Solutions Alliance. The 1 -35W Solutions Alliance is a legal joint powers
board created in 1989 by the Dakota County Board of Commissioners and the Hennepin
County Regional Railroad Authority, along with the cities of Apple Valley, Bloomington,
Burnsville, Lakeville, Minneapolis and Richfield, as a coalition of transportation interests to
improve mobility in the 1 -35W corridor. The Alliance serves as project coordinator operating
under a $500,000 State grant for the study.
The transportation corridor from Northfield to Minneapolis faces significant issues in
population growth, and traffic congestion and safety. Interstate 35W south of downtown
Minneapolis is already one of the most heavily traveled freeways in the metropolitan area
and does not have the capacity to accommodate more automobile traffic. The population in
the Twin Cities area is projected to grow by 650,000 in the next twenty years,with no
significant roadway expansion planned. Officials in communities within the corridor have
http:// www. ci. edina.mn.us/Events /dan _patch.htm 5/10/2001
Dan Patch public open houses set for May 30 and 31
Page 2 of 2
indicated they favor evaluating alternate transportation modes to determine if they can be
served with a comfortable, efficient, and affordable alternative to commuting by automobile.
The 1 -35W Solutions Alliance established a Technical and a Policy Committee to further
assist in the development of this study. Each community within -the study corridor is
represented on these committees. The Technical Committee reviews the study's technical
aspects. The Policy Committee makes study recommendations to the 1 -35W Solutions
Alliance. The 1 -35W Solutions Alliance is the decision - making body for the study and will
make a recommendation to the Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of
Transportation (MnDOT) at its conclusion.
This study provides a more detailed exploration of commuter rail and its relation to other
transportation modes and land use patterns in the corridor. The study builds on the
analyses, findings and recommendations of the MnDOT's Twin Cities Metropolitan
Commuter Rail Feasibility Study of 1998.
MnDOT has identified the Dan Patch Corridor in its first tier of corridors for commuter rail
service, recommending further study and evaluation. This corridor is one of three rail
corridors identified by the Minnesota Legislature in 1998 to receive funding to study
commuter rail alternatives. The others are the North Star Corridor from St. Cloud to
Minneapolis and the Red Rock Corridor from Hastings through St. Paul to Minneapolis.
The Dan Patch Corridor Commuter Rail Feasibility Study will be completed in the summer
of 2001. If recommended as a feasible transportation option, the MnDOT Commissioner
will determine if the corridor will advance to a study phase determining physical design,
environmental effects and implementation cost.
The Dan Patch Corridor spans more than 40 miles. The railroad line was used for
passenger rail service between 1910 and 1942. The line was originally named for the
famous racehorse from Savage. The Canadian Pacific Railway owns most of the line, with
the St. Louis Park to Minneapolis segment owned by Burlington Northern Santa Fe. The
railroad swing bridge across the Minnesota River is owned by the Twin Cities and Western
Railroad.
The last set of public open houses for this study is planned for late summer 2001.
Additional study information may be obtained at the study's web site,
www.danpatchcorridor.com. For additional study information or questions contact Scott
Peters, Project Manager, Dakota County Office of Planning, 952 - 891 -7027.
Source: City of Edina, Minnesota
Modified: Monday, May 07, 2001
This page is part of the City of Edina Wortd Wide Web Information System
HOME
http: / /www.ci. edina '.mn.us /Events /dan _patch.htm 5/10/2001
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
4/27/01 —513/01
Check # Date Amount Vendor Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Account Description
220826 4/27101 100686 CITY OF EDINA PAYROLL ACCOUNT
420 000.00 PAYROLL FUNDING 17358 4/27 PAYROLL 9900.1010 CASH TREASURER'S
5/2/01 9:54:36
Page - 1
Business Unit
PAYROLL CLEARING
17484 5201 1400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
17251
042401
420,000.00
LICENSES & PERMITS
220827
4/30/01
88311
103056 FALLS AUTOMOTIVE INC.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
GENERAL (BILLING)
19,707.00
2001 DODGE RAM
5311.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
19,707.00
17252
220828
5/3/01
GENERAL SUPPLIES
100613 AAA
1,056.40
LICENSE, TITLE FOR 47.299
1,056.40
220829
5/3/01
100616 ACTION MAILING SERVICES INC.
262.47
MAIL PROCESSING
436.73
MAILING
699.20
220830
5/3/01
102191 ADVANCED GRAPHIC SYSTEMS INC.
174.44
TONER CARTRIDGES
174.44
220831
513/01
104448 AGIA
100.00
SPRING CONFERENCE FEE
100.00
220832
5/3/01
100621 ALBINSON REPROGRAPHICS
807.70
PLAN COPIES
807.70
220833
5/3/01
102609 ALL SAINTS BRANDS
173.0_0
173.00
220834
5/3/01
100575 ALL -SAFE DIV. OF ALL FIRE TEST
69.70
EXTINGUISHERS
69.70
220835
513/01
102715 ALLEGRA PRINT & IMAGING
157.46
ELECTION MANUAL PRINTING
157.46
5/2/01 9:54:36
Page - 1
Business Unit
PAYROLL CLEARING
17484 5201 1400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
17251
042401
1553.6260
LICENSES & PERMITS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
17222
88311
5910.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
GENERAL (BILLING)
17232
88312
5311.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
POOL OPERATION
17252
INV00034371
1550.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
17485
3/31/01
1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
17438
C108435
01314.1705.31MATERIALS /SUPPLIES
BA -314 78TH & CAHILL
17345 00023827 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
17255 37669
17254 37358
5420.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CLUB HOUSE
1184.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPECIAL ELECTIONS
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
4/27/01 -5/3101
PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Account Description
17256 130492001 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor Explanation
220836
5/3/01
10340
100630 ANCHOR PAPER CO. INC..
COST OF GOODS SOLD
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
80.55
MYLAR PAPER
5430.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
80.55
220837
5/3/01
102109 ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER
245.50
2 -WAY RADIO REPAIR
245.50
220838
5/3/01
100595 ANOKA COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTM
220.00
OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT
220.00
220839
5/3/01
101611 ANOKA - HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLE
135.00
SAFETY TRAINING
135.00
220840
5/3/01
102172 APPERTS FOODSERVICE
254.58
FOOD
254.58
220841
5/3/01
101977 ARCH WIRELESS
361.56
PAGERS - APRIL
357.89
PAGERS - MARCH BALANCE
719.45
220842
5/3/01
104433 ARENS, TONY
25.00
PROGRAM REFUND
25.00
220843
5/3/01
101677 ARMCOM DISTRIBUTING CO.
865.21
CEILING TILE & SUPPORTS
25.00
CEILING TILE SUPPORTS
890.21
220844
5/3/01
100375 ASPEN ENVIRONMENTAL
29.39
RESTROOM RENTAL
29.39
220845
5/3/01
101954 AUGIE'S INC.
47.01
SANDWICHES
53.25
SANDWICHES
V
17180 9910
17257 042501
1553.6237 RADIO SERVICE
5/2/01 9:54:36
Page - 2
Business Unit
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET
17439 00012866 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING
17258 108823 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL
17259 K6338001D 1400.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL
17260 K6338001C. 1400.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL
17261 042501 1001.4390 REGISTRATION FEES
17182 30361 -01 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS
17183 30361 -00 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
GENERAL FUND REVENUES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
17227
16187
1646.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
17262
10340
5430.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
17486
10486
5430.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check # Date Amount Vendor Explanation
100.26
220846 5/3/01 104069 BAD BOY WATSON GRAPHIC DESIGN
675.21 BUSINESS CARDS
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
4/27/01 -5/3/01
PO # Doc No Inv No
220847
5/3/01
1552.6530
102195
BATTERIES PLUS
8703800
5410.6513
49.33
17264
BATTERIES
1400.6513
OFFICE SUPPLIES
24.26
8694610
BATTERIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
17487
73.59
1400.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
220848
5/3101
1400.6406
101355
BELLBOY CORPORATION
8706660
1400.6406
439.02
17490
CM8698800
1180.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1,208.10
8700980
1180.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
17492
29.28
1160.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
17493
8718350
1,676.40
GENERAL SUPPLIES
17493
220849
5/3/01
GENERAL SUPPLIES
100648
BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS
1495.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
59.92
HILIGHTER, PAPER
81.14
CARTRIDGES
2.95
ROLLER BALL REFILLS
384.10
OFFICE SUPPLIES
49.92
PARTITIONS, ORGANIZER
282.52
BOOK SHELF, STENO BOOK
12.76
ENVELOPES
23.05-
CREDIT
94.79
OFFICE SUPPLIES
114.38
OFFICE SUPPLIES
45.24
OFFICE SUPPLIES
113.45
OFFICE SUPPLIES
45.76
OFFICE SUPPLIES
1,263.88
220850
5/3/01
100711
BLOOD, DAVID
17224 367
Account No Account Description
1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
17440 F5 -70871 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS
17441 71597 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS
5/2/01 9:54:36
Page - 3
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
17236 21172200 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING
17237 21169000 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING
17346 33766700 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING
17184
8697030
1552.6530
REPAIR PARTS
17263
8703800
5410.6513
OFFICE SUPPLIES
17264
8704370
1400.6513
OFFICE SUPPLIES
17265
8694610
1400.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
17487
8707440
1400.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
17488
8701330
1400.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
17489
8706660
1400.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
17490
CM8698800
1180.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
17491
8700980
1180.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
17492
8704240
1160.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
17493
8718350
1550.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
17493
8718350
1180.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
17493
8718350
1495.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
100.00 POLICE SERVICE 17417 050301
100.00
220851 5/3/01 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS
438.51 STARTER 17266 263517
438.51
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
ELECTION
ELECTION
FINANCE
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
ELECTION
INSPECTIONS
1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM
1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
5/2101 9:54:36
Council Check Register
Page - 4
4/27/01 -5/3/01
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Account Description
Business Unit
220852
5/3 /01
101516
BRAEMAR PRINTING
2,086.34
BROCHURE PRINTING
17267
55302
5420.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CLUB HOUSE
2,086.34
220853
5/3101
100664
BRAUN INTERTEC
148.00
TESTING OF WATER MAIN
17442
061142
5913.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
DISTRIBUTION
148.00
220854
5/3101
101366
BRENTS SIGNS AND DISPLAYS
127.80
- --
SIGNS
17269
00001905
5410.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
127.80
220855
5/3/01
100669
BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC.
585.56
CLASS 5 FOR WATER BREAKS 17270
PO 5472
5913.6517
SAND GRAVEL 8 ROCK
DISTRIBUTION
585.56
220856
5/3/61
100776
BUTLER, GEORGE
100.00
POLICE SERVICE
17415
050301
1419.6102
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
RESERVE PROGRAM
100.00
220857
5/3/01
101111
CAHNERS
128.77
AD FOR BID
17185
1706300
1120.6120
ADVERTISING LEGAL
ADMINISTRATION
128.77
AD FOR BID
17186
1716944
1120.6120
ADVERTISING LEGAL
ADMINISTRATION
128.77
AD FOR BID
17187
1700080
1120.6120
ADVERTISING LEGAL
ADMINISTRATION
386.31
220858
5/3/01
102149
CALLAWAY GOLF
106.75
TOWELS
17271
96421843
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
106.75
220859
5/3/01
100679
CARLSON TRACTOR & EQUIPMENT
_ 458.93
HYDRAULIC CYLINDER
17272
1026702
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
458.93
220860
5/3/01
100681
CATCO
64.72
CARTRIDGE, KIT
17443
3 -58360
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
64.72
220861
5/3/01
104447
CENTER FOR POLICE ORGANIZATION
450.00
REGISTRATION FEES
17494
042701
1400.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
450.00
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
4/27/01 -5/3/01
Check # Date Amount Vendor Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No
220862 5/3/01 104397 CHATTERTON, DAVID
3000 LICENSE FEE 17188 042301
5/2/01 9:54:36
Page - 5
Account No Account Description Business Unit
1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING
17189 067967 1301.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK GENERAL MAINTENANCE
17189 067967 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE
17273
28697
30.00
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
17435
220863
5/3/01
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
100087
CITY OF ST. PAUL
01509479
1553.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
104.20
17274
01511402
ASPHALT
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
512.16
01511402
1552.6406
ASPHALT
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
17444
616.36
1301.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
220864
5/3/01
100689
CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP.
141.98
PROXIMITY SWITCHES
_ 2,583.00
AIR PAK
2,724.98
220865
5/3101
101323
CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS
68.10
GLOVES
13.66
SAFETY GLASSES, COVERALLS
112.69
SAFETY GLASSES, COVERALLS
114.28
EAR MUFFS, SUNSCREEN
308.73
220866
5/3/01
101704
COOK, BARB
140.00
ADAPTIVE B -BALL STAFF
140.00
220867
5/3/01
101924
CRYSTEEL DIST. INC.
640.65
HANGER RODS
640.65
220868
5/3/01
100700
CURTIS 1000
442.84
LARGE ENVELOPES
442.84
220869
5/3101
101390
DANKO EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT
CO.
_33.02
GEAR BAG
33.02
220870
5/3101
102478
DAY DISTRIBUTING
42.40
2,541.70
5/2/01 9:54:36
Page - 5
Account No Account Description Business Unit
1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING
17189 067967 1301.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK GENERAL MAINTENANCE
17189 067967 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE
17273
28697
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
17435
56392
1470.6550
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
17190
01509479
1553.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
17274
01511402
1646.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
17274
01511402
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
17444
01514086
1301.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
17495
042601
1629.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ADAPTIVE RECREATION
17191
F102019
1553.6585
ACCESSORIES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
17275 38411701 1400.6575 PRINTING
17434 345028
17347 132660
17348 132655
1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING
5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor
Explanation
307.55
Page - 6
4/27101 —5/3101
2,891.65
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
220871
5/3/01
17349
100720
DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
17276
50.04
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
BAKERY
17277
99570
37.87
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
BAKERY
99624
5421.5510
21.65
GRILL
17278
BAKERY
4606.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
109.56
11
220872
5/3/01
17279
101947
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
TELETYPE SERVICE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
1,260.00
11
COPS - STATE CONNECT
17445
1,260.00
1001.4115
MECHANICAL PERMITS
GENERAL FUND REVENUES
220873
5/3/01
1629.6103
101947
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
17498
2759
660.00
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
EDINBOROUGH PARK
CJDN CONNECTION
D- 7000 -01760
5915.6586
660.00
WATER TREATMENT
5
220874
5/3/01
104437
DITTER INC.
58.72
JOB CANCELED
58.72
220875
5/3/01
104442
DOKKEN, KIRSTEN
180.00
B -BALL COORDINATOR
180.00
220876
5/3/01
104444
DOODY MECHANICAL SERVICE CO.
384.35
PLUMBING REPAIRS
384.35
220877
5/3/01
100731
DPC INDUSTRIES
174.00
CYLINDER DEPOSIT
174.00
220878
5/3/01
100736
E -Z-GO TEXTRON
209.52
CART REPAIR PARTS
209.52
220879
5/3/01
100739
EAGLE WINE
CITY OF EDINA
5/2/01 9:54:36
Council Check Register
Page - 6
4/27101 —5/3101
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Account Description
Business Unit
17349
132656
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
17276
99507
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
17277
99570
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
17496
99624
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
17278
P07MN027060M
4606.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
COPS MORE GRANT
11
17279
P07MN0270600
1400.6204
TELETYPE SERVICE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
11
17445
ED007357
1001.4115
MECHANICAL PERMITS
GENERAL FUND REVENUES
17497
042501
1629.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ADAPTIVE RECREATION
17498
2759
5620.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
EDINBOROUGH PARK
17280
D- 7000 -01760
5915.6586
WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES
WATER TREATMENT
5
17446 0735777 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF CARS
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
Date
--
Amount
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
5/2/01 9:54:36
Council Check Register
778750
87.80
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
Page - 7
4/27/01 -5/3/01
777649
994.30
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Account Description
Business Unit
17350
369103
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
17351
369098
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
17352
369092
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
17353
369085
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
17354
4/19
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
STATEMENT
48.00
17524
369096
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
Check #
-
Date
--
Amount
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
Vendor Explanation
- --
17239
778750
87.80
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
17281
777649
994.30
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
17355
780609
127.70
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
17499
779352
715.07
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
128.40-
CREDIT ON ACCOUNT
1,247.70
3,044.17
220880
5/3101
100741
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
48.00
1,175.15
63.00
722.40
38.85
2,047.40
220881
5/3/01
100549
ELECTRIC PUMP INC.
11,816.63
LIFT PUMP
11,816.63
220882
5/3/01
100216
FARMER BROTHERS COFFEE
38.20
COFFEE
38.20
220883
5/3/01
102003
FASTSIGNS BLOOMINGTON
687.46
SIGNAGE
687.46
220884
5/3/01
104270
FLARE HEATING & AIR CONDITIONI
6,505.00
A/C - FURNACE UPGRADE
6,505.00
220885
5/3/01
104446
FORM RESERVATIONS INC.
1,325.00
PRINTER & CASH DRAWER
1,190.00
KEYBOARDS, SCANNERS
2,515.00
220886
5/3101
102380
FORMS GROUP, THE
OFFENSE REPORTS
565.65
17238
778783
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
17239
778750
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
17281
777649
5430.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
17355
780609
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
17499
779352
5430.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
17447 0017050 -IN 5911.6530 REPAIR PARTS PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER
17282 7843088 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD
17217 817674 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
17431 0004060 -IN 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS
17500 2894 5410.6513 OFFICI= SUPPLIES
17501 2894. 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
17283 00003056 1400.6575 PRINTING
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
CENTENNIAL LAKES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check #
Date
Amount
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
Vendor
Explanation
220887
5/3101
GENERAL SUPPLIES
100760
FOWLER ELECTRIC
66.35
10.19
BELTS, SHELF BINS
REPAIR PARTS
495 - 075769 -2
1552.6530
10.19
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
220888
5/3/01
101662
GCSAA
498 - 001015 -3
1551.6530
REPAIR PARTS
250.00
DUES - J. NYLUND
125.00
17478
495 - 837846 -7
DUES - R. ATOL
REPAIR PARTS
EDINBOROUGH PARK
375.00
166.86
220889
5/3/01
104438
GEBERT FLOOR COVERING INC.
117.00
5/3/01
CARPET REPAIR
GRAND PERE WINES INC
117.00
220890
5/3101
102385
GOLF MINNESOTA
17240
150.00
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
DIRECTORY
150.00
220891
5/3/01
5842.5513
101679
GOLFCRAFT
246.00
230.00
GOLF CLUBS
145.00
220894
GOLF CLUBS
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
4/27/01 -5/3/01
PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Account Description
17192 57206600 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS
5/2/01 9:54:36
Page - 8
Business Unit
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
17219 99466905 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION
17220 99478215 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION
17448
16608
1551.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
CITY HALL GENERAL
17286
W -01087
5410.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
17284 14431 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
17285 14438 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
220892
5/3/01
101103
GRAINGER
66.35
BELTS, SHELF BINS
17193
495 - 075769 -2
1552.6530
REPAIR PARTS
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
46.24
GEARMOTOR, CONNECTOR
17194
498 - 001015 -3
1551.6530
REPAIR PARTS
CITY HALL GENERAL
54.27
FAN SWITCH
17478
495 - 837846 -7
5620.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EDINBOROUGH PARK
166.86
220893
5/3/01
102670
GRAND PERE WINES INC
83.00
17240
00008263
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
163.00
17525
00008280
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
246.00
220894
5/3/01
102217
GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC
466.00
17526
38500
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
866.00
17527
38501
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
1,332.00
220895
5/3/01
100785
GREUPNER, JOE
6,000.00
MONTHLY RETAINER
17502
042601
5410.6132
PROFESSIONAL SVCS - GOLF
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
4/27/01 -5/3/01
Check # Date Amount Vendor Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No
50.00
Account No Account Description
5/2/01 9:54:36
Page- 9
Business Unit
17241
366159
6,000.00
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
220896
5/3101
5842.5515
100782
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
17357
369102
.70
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
17359
369097
380.16
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
17360
369087
5,728.49
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
17361
369088
.70
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
17362
369089
42.95
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
17363
369090
1,613.34
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
17364
369095
24.65
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
17365
559736
26.65
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
17365
559736
384.22
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
17366
559539
30.68-
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
2.84-
159.73-
8,008.61
220897
5/3/01
102628
GROSSMAN CHEVROLET COMPANY INC
_ 15,903.00
EXTENDED CAB PICK -UP TRUCK
15,903.00
220898
5/3/01
103725
HAMER, STEVE
23.00
B WATER LICENSE
23.00
220899
5/3/01
100792
HARMON AUTOGLASS
210.12
WINDSHIELD REPLACEMENT
210.12
220900
513/01
102301
HARTLAND FUEL PRODUCTS LLC
10,727.60
GAS
10,727.60
220901
5/3/01
104432
HEAD LITES CORPORATION
869.00
SAFETY OUTER CLOTHING
869.00
220902
5/3/01
101717
HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
50.00
UTILITY PERMIT
50.00
Account No Account Description
5/2/01 9:54:36
Page- 9
Business Unit
17241
366159
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
17356
369101
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
17357
369102
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
17359
369097
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
17360
369087
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
17361
369088
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
17362
369089
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
17363
369090
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
17364
369095
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
17365
559736
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
17365
559736
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
17366
559539
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
17234 78871 1650.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
17287 042401 5919.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS
17288 0014 - 0000084 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS
52
17449 398687 1553.6581 GASOLINE
17289 SI -19345 1400.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT
17450 UTIL0000156 5913.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS
TRAINING
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
DISTRIBUTION
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check # Date Amount Vendor Explanation
220903 5/3/01 100805 HIRSHFIELDS
56.42 PAINT, PRIMER
56.42
220904 5/3/01 102843 HO, JEFFERY D.
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
4/27/01 -5/3/01
PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Account Description
17195 003639854 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
2,000.00 MEDICAL DIRECTOR SERVICES
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
220909 5/3/01
101120 HOSPITALITY MINNESOTA
2,000.00
FOOD SAFETY COURSE
99.00
220905
5/3/01
100842 HOUSEHOLD BANK F.S.B. (KNOX)
104441
HOMDROM, NANCY
179.23
HAMMER DRILL
90.00
STAPLES, ALUMINUM SNIP
P.S. SAMPLER
DRILL
100.15-
90.00
234.14
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
220906
5/3/01
_ 52.99
101048
HOME JUICE
42.85
42.85
220907
5/3/01
100417
HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY
19.97
D.E. POWDER
64.06
CHLORINE
84.03
220908
5/3/01
100808
HORWATH, TOM
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
220909 5/3/01
101120 HOSPITALITY MINNESOTA
99.00
FOOD SAFETY COURSE
99.00
17480
220910 5/3/01
100842 HOUSEHOLD BANK F.S.B. (KNOX)
15.14
CERAMIC PULLS
179.23
HAMMER DRILL
39.77
STAPLES, ALUMINUM SNIP
100.15
DRILL
100.15-
RETURN DRILL
234.14
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
220911 5/3101
102114 HUEBSCH
_ 52.99
TOWELS, RAGS
52.99
5/2/01 9:54:36
Page - 10
Business Unit
SNOW & ICE REMOVAL
17425 050301 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
17503 042601 1629.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADAPTIVE RECREATION
17367 00093798 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING
17479
1042004
5620.6545
CHEMICALS
EDINBOROUGH PARK
17480
1041911
5620.6545
CHEMICALS
EDINBOROUGH PARK
17196
042401
1644.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
TREES & MAINTENANCE
17504 MAY 23 5410.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS GOLF ADMINISTRATION
17197
0217 - 459566
1301.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
17228
0217 - 459660
1646.6556
TOOLS
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
17229
0217 - 459522
1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
17230
0217 - 459624
1646.6556
TOOLS
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
17231
0217 - 459659
1646.6556
TOOLS
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
17481 338488 5620.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EOUIPMENTEDINBOROUGH PARK
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA 512/01 9:54:36
Council Check Register Page - 11
4/27/01 -5/3/01
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Account Description
Business Unit
220912
5/3/01
100811 HYDRO SUPPLY CO
583.62
CONNECTORS, GASKETS
17290
0018605 -IN
5900.1357
INVENTORY WATER METER
UTILITY BALANCE SHEET
2,017.96
WATER METERS
17291
0018635 -IN
5900.1357
INVENTORY WATER METER
UTILITY BALANCE SHEET
_ 454.76
BARE METER HEX
17292
0018641 -IN
5900.1357
INVENTORY WATER METER
UTILITY BALANCE SHEET
3,056.34
220913
5/3/01
100416 INDEPENDENT EMERGENCY SERVICES
_ 33.00
HANDSET FOR PSAP OPERATOR
17505
501
1400.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
33.00
220914
5/3101
101630 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST #273
165.00
CUSTODIAL OVERTIME
17506
2409
4077.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
165.00
220915
5/3/01
101861 J.H. LARSON COMPANY
10.16
PLUG -IN CB
17293
4222954 -01
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
7.32
EXTENSION RING, RECEPTACLE
17294
4222951 -01
1553.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
17.48
220916
5/3/01
101400 JAMES, WILLIAM F
100.00
POLICE SERVICE
17422
050301
1419.6102
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
RESERVE PROGRAM
100.00
220917
5/3/01
100830 JERRY'S PRINTING
156.82
VOLUNTEER PROGRAM
17451
A -18166
1500.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CONTINGENCIES
156.82
220918
5/3/01
102146 JESSEN PRESS
74.55
REFERENDUM MAILING
17295
42435
2210.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
COMMUNICATIONS
74.55
220919
5/3/01
103959 JOHN NAGENGAST DOORS LLC
750.00
NEW DOOR INSTALLATION
17296
628
1375.6530
REPAIR PARTS
PARKING RAMP
750.00
220920
5/3/01
100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO.
857.41
17242
1244953
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
119.00
17368
1247730
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
1,926.80
17369
1247728
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
2,119.60
17370
1247727
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
5/2101 9:54:36
Council Check Register
Page - 12
4/27/01 -5/3/01
Check # Date
Amount
Vendor Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Account Description
Business Unit
80.09
17371
1247725
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
60.70-
17372
156597
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
157.05
17528
1247713
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
781.02
17529
1247712
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
124.00
17530
1247717
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
974.45
17531
1247715
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
132.40
17532
1247716
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
657.31
17533
1247714
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
366.34
17534
1247718
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
2,382.40
17535
1247721
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
643.85
17536
1247722
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
532.25
17537
1247723
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
46.00
17538
1247724
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
4,733.40
17539
1247719
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
16,572.67
220921 5/3/01
101072 JOHNSON, WALTER
100.00
POLICE SERVICE
17424
050301
1419.6102
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
RESERVE PROGRAM
100.00
220922 5/3/01
101918 JUNGWIRTH, MARK
23.00
C WATER LICENSE
17297
042501
5919.6260
LICENSES & PERMITS
TRAINING
23.00
220923 5/3/01
100837 JUSTUS LUMBER
32.99
LUMBER, SCREWS
17452
17884
1301.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
491.09
MAILBOX, POST, LUMBER
17453
17142
1318.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
SNOW & ICE REMOVAL
524.08
220924 5/3/01
102101 KINKO'S
81.47
PRINTING
17507
062200036777
5610.6575
PRINTING
ED ADMINISTRATION
81.47
220925 5/3/01
100944 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC.
68.00-
17243
CM0418
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
859.50
17373
149675
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
1,748.50
17374
150066
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
815.45
17375
150065
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
39.50
17376
150064
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
1,112,95
17377
150063
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
4,83_
17378
. 0418CM
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check #
Date
Amount
101494
Vendor Explanation
Council Check Register
4,503.07
Page - 13
220926
5/3/01
104439
KLINE, LEA
PO # Doc No
Inv No
26.50
Account Description
TENNIS LESSON REFUND
17508
042701
26.50
REGISTRATION FEES
GENERAL FUND REVENUES
220927
5/3/01
1553.6530
100845
KREMER SPRING & ALIGNMENT INC.
S 17454
100929
55.11
ACCESSORIES
SHACKLE KIT
NT 17455
042601
239.84
-
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
FORD REAR, PIN, U -BOLT
17379
296255
294.95
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
220928
5/3/01
5822.5514
102474
KRULL, JULIE
17540
295774
17.99
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
UNIFORM REIMBURSEME
17.99
220929
5/3/01
1509229
100846
KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO
-
543.20
310.30
CITY OF EDINA
5/3/01
101494
512/01 9:54:36
Council Check Register
Page - 13
4/27/01 -5/3/01
100.00
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Account Description
Business Unit
17508
042701
1001.4390
REGISTRATION FEES
GENERAL FUND REVENUES
17298
100982
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
S 17454
100929
1553.6585
ACCESSORIES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
NT 17455
042601
1400.6203
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
17379
296255
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
17380
296254
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
17540
295774
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
220930
5/3/01
101494
LARSEN, PHILIP
100.00
RACE FOR THE CURE SUPPLIES
17509
042701
1500.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CONTINGENCIES
100.00
220931
5/3/01
100852
LAWSON PRODUCTS INC.
82.25
TOW STRAP
17198
1507669
1553.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
228.05
FITTINGS, COUPLINGS
17299
1509229
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
310.30
220932
5/3/01
104430
LINDQUIST, RENEE
120.46
WATER BILL PAYMENT REFUND
17216
042401
5900.1211.1
ACCTS RECEIVABLE MANUAL
UTILITY BALANCE SHEET
120.46
220933
513/01
101715
LINEAR DYNAMICS INC.
_
17.92
FREIGHT CHARGES
17199
210707
1335.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PAVEMENT MARKINGS
17.92
220934
5/3/01
102597
LLOYD, JUDY
195.00
ADAPTIVE PROGRAM STAFF
17510
042601
1629.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ADAPTIVE RECREATION
195.00
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
4/27101 -5/3/01
Check # Date Amount Vendor Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Account Description
220935 5/3/01 104434 LUNDGREN, MEREDITH
48.00 PROGRAM REFUND 17300 042301 1001.4390 REGISTRATION FEES
17301 067419 5913.6575 PRINTING
5/2101 9:54:36
Page - 14
Business Unit
GENERAL FUND REVENUES
DISTRIBUTION
17244
269790
48.00
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
17245
220936
5/3101
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
102828
MAIL HANDLING SERVICES
269787
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
339.31
17247
269788
POSTCARD PRINTING
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
339.31
268485
5430.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
220937
5/3101
270031
100868
MARK VII SALES
YORK SELLING
17382
270030
32.70
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
17383
270029
5842.5515
907.00
YORK SELLING
17384
270028
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
2,326.10
17385
270007
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
32.70
272190
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
75.00
97.50
62.25
55.95
2,694.20
1,660.65
1,555.55
9,499.60
220938
5/3101
104435
MASCOTS & COSTUMES
2,150.00
EDINA AQUATIC COSTUME
2,150.00
220939
5/3/01
104427
MATSON, BOB
478.80
GLOVES
478.80
220940
5/3/01
100875
MCCAREN DESIGNS INC.
957.85
PLANTS
957.85
220941
5/3/01
104428
MCGOLDRICK, VIRGINIA
_ 60.00
PATRON CARD REIMBURSEMENT
60.00
220942
5/3/01
100870
MDS MATRX
4.87
FREIGHT CHARGES
17301 067419 5913.6575 PRINTING
5/2101 9:54:36
Page - 14
Business Unit
GENERAL FUND REVENUES
DISTRIBUTION
17244
269790
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
17245
269789
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
17246
269787
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
17247
269788
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
17302
268485
5430.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
17381
270031
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
17382
270030
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
17383
270029
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
17384
270028
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
17385
270007
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
17541
272190
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
17437 4491
17200 100A
17482 16202
5310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
1301.6610 SAFETY EOUIPMENT
POOL ADMINISTRATION
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
5620.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH PARK
17201 042301 5401.4603 COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS GOLF REVENUES
17511 737057 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
4/27/01 -5/3/01
Check # Date Amount Vendor Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No
-
-- -
-- 4.87
GENERAL SUPPLIES
17456
220943
5/3/01
GENERAL SUPPLIES
101483
MENARDS
1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
29.54
53006
PAINT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
56332
25.49
CLEANING SUPPLIES
CALCULATOR, HOOKS
17226
56334
39.09
GENERAL SUPPLIES
SHELF & BRACKETS, BATTERY
17304
56326
57.30
GENERAL SUPPLIES
SHOP VAC
151.42
220944
5/3/01
102281
MENARDS
77.90
VISE CLAMPS, WOOD
77.90
220945
513101
100881
MERFELD, BURT
100.00
POLICE SERVICE
100.00
220946
5/3/01
100882
MERIT SUPPLY
592.67
CLEANING SUPPLIES
477.65
ASPHALT/TAR CLEANER
207.68
CONCRETE CLEANER
332.07
SNOW WHITE, TOWELS, LINERS
220.30
DESCALER, NAPKINS
132.06
SCRUBS -IN- THE - BUCKET
1,962.43
220947
5/3/01
102800
MEYERS PRINTING COMPANY
2,266.50
POOL BROCHURE
2,266.50
220948
5/3/01
100692
MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLING COM
76.00
204.15
352.50
171.80
804.45
220949
5/3101
100913
MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER &
1,575.00
WATER SERVICE
1,200.00
WATER SERVICE
2,775.00
Account No Account Description
17303
52129
5422.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
17456
52370
1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
17457
53054
1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
17512
53006
5431.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
17458 2205 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
5/2/01 9:54:36
Page - 15
Business Unit
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
17416 050301 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM
17202
56335
5511.6511
CLEANING SUPPLIES
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
17203
56337
1314.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
STREET RENOVATION
17204
56333
1552.6511
CLEANING SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
17205
56332
1552.6511
CLEANING SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
17226
56334
1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
17304
56326
5921.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
LIFT STATION MAINT
17305 173745
17306 66485129
17307 67076216
17308 66485111
17386 65865100
17309 31935
17310 31936
5310.6575 PRINTING
POOL ADMINISTRATION
5430.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
5430.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION
5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/2101 9:54:36
Council Check Register Page - 16
4/27/01 — 5001
Check # Date Amount Vendor Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Account Description
220950 5/3/01 101638 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
23.00 C WATER LICENSE -MATT EGAN 17311 WATER 5919.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS
LICENSE
TRAINING
17206 27060000700M 5310.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POOL ADMINISTRATION
17459
042001
23.00
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
50TH STREET GENERAL
220951
5/3/01
5840.6104
101899
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC
17459
042001
100.00
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
CHEMICAL FEES
17312
0097998
100.00
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PONDS & LAKES
220952
5/3/01
5933.6406
101686
MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL BEVERAGE A
17314
0098147
50.00
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ALCOHOL AWARENESS TRAINING
50.00
ALCOHOL AWARENESS TRAINING
50.00
ALCOHOL AWARENESS TRAINING
150.00
220953
5/3101
101376
MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPMENT
808.14
STORM SEWER LIFT SUPPLIES
1,146.11-
CREDIT MEMO
1,805.02
FIRE HYDRANT
1,467.05
220954
5/3101
101459
MINNESOTA RECREATION & PARKAS
1,460.00
ADULT SOFTBALL REGISTRATION
1,460.00
220955
513/01
101917
MN FIRE SERVICE CERTIFICATION
30.00
CERTIFICATION FEES
30.00
220956
5/3/01
100159
MOOERS PRINTING INC.
528.24
EMS FORMS
528.24
220957
5/3/01
100914
MUNICILITE CO.
53.68
OFF /ON SWITCHES
53.68
220958
5/3/01
101981
NATIONAL RECREATION AND PARKA
70.00
DUES - V. COCKRIEL
70.00
TRAINING
17206 27060000700M 5310.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POOL ADMINISTRATION
17459
042001
5820.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
50TH STREET GENERAL
17459
042001
5840.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
17459
042001
5860.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
17312
0097998
5933.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PONDS & LAKES
17313
0098277
5933.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PONDS & LAKES
17314
0098147
5913.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
DISTRIBUTION
17207 042401
17427 042501
17429 2209
17315 1691
17235 23124
4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES
1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
1640.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA 5/2/01 9:54:36
Council Check Register Page - 17
4/27/01 -5/3/01
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor
Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Account Description
Business Unit
220959
5/3/01
101725
NATIONAL TRUST FORUM
115.00
ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP DUES
17316
23068828
1140.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
PLANNING
115.00
220960
5/3/01
104443
NATURAL ENVIRONMENTS
CORP.
2,850.00
STONE FLOOR REPAIRS
17513
34362
5620.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
EDINBOROUGH PARK
2,850.00
220961
5/3101
101710
NELSON, DAN
30.00
B -BALL PROGRAM STAFF
17514
042501
1629.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ADAPTIVE RECREATION
30.00
220962
5/3/01
104431
NENA
75.00
MEMBERSHIP DUES
17317
042501
1400.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
75.00
220963
5/3/01
100922
NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS
181.71
SIGNS
17460
TW066359
1375.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PARKING RAMP
181.71
220964
5/3/01
101359
NIBBE, MICHAEL
28.75
CONT. ED. (MEALS)
17515
042701
1400.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
28.75
220965
5/3/01
100724
NISSEN, DICK
100.00
POLICE SERVICE
17421
050301
1419.6102
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
RESERVE PROGRAM
100.00
220966
513101
102607
NORTH MEMORIAL HEALTH CARE
80.00
OFFICER SURVIVAL SEMINAR
17318
PTAC
1400.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
80.00
220967
5/3/01
100929
NORTH STAR ICE
92.64
17387
02111305
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
25.94
17388
02111304
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
145.60
17389
02111303
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
264.18
220968
5/3/01
100925
NORTH STAR TURF
347.84
LAWN MOWER BLADES
17319
248600
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor
Explanation
347.84
Page - 18
4/27/01 —5/3/01
220969
5/3/01
101394
NORTHERN BALANCE & SCALE INC
Account No
Account Description
164.00
LE 17436
00028460
CLEAN & CALIBRATE SCA
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
LABORATORY
164.00
NW -70068
1553.6583
TIRES & TUBES
220970
513/01
86333
100930
NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO.
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
17461
87556
304.07
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL (BILLING)
TIRES, TUBES, SERVICE
459
1644.6541
304.07
TREES & MAINTENANCE
17516
451393
220971
5/3/01
GOLF CARS
100936
OLSEN COMPANIES
1325.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
STREET NAME SIGNS
76.95
69383008
5822.5515
PINTLE HOOK
50TH ST SELLING
17249
_ 263.61
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
RATCHET BINDER, LINKS
17554
043001
340.56
P.E.R.A. PAYABLE
GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET
17555
220972
5/3/01
P.E.R.A. PAYABLE
104409
OUT BACK NURSERY INC.
75.62
TREE STOCK
75.62
220973
5/3/01
102160
PARADIGM SPORTS INC.
35.73
CART PARTS
35.73
220974
5/3101
100674
PENHALL COMPANY
300.00
CORE DRILL
300.00
220975
5/3/01
100945
PEPSI -COLA COMPANY
220976 513/01 100946 PERA
39.24
39.24
220977 5/3/01 100946 PERA
66,767.91
66,767.91
220978 5/3/01 104440 PETT, LAURA
CONTRIBUTIONS 4/24/01
CONTRIBUTIONS 4/24/01
CITY OF EDINA
5/2101 9:54:36
Councll Check Register
Page - 18
4/27/01 —5/3/01
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Account Description
Business Unit
LE 17436
00028460
1491.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
LABORATORY
17320
NW -70068
1553.6583
TIRES & TUBES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
17208
86333
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
17461
87556
5910.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL (BILLING)
17462
459
1644.6541
PLANTINGS & TREES
TREES & MAINTENANCE
17516
451393
5423.6530
REPAIR PARTS
GOLF CARS
17463
46484
1325.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
STREET NAME SIGNS
17248
69383008
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
17249
69383009
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
17554
043001
1000.2023
P.E.R.A. PAYABLE
GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET
17555
04/30
1000.2023
P.E.R.A. PAYABLE
GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET
CITY OF EDINA
512/01 9:54:36
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 19
4/27/01 -5/3/01
Check # Date
Amount
Vendor Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Account Description
Business Unit
25.00
ADAPTIVE PROGRAM STAFF 17517
042601
1629.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ADAPTIVE RECREATION
25.00
220979 5/3/01
100950 PETTY CASH
13.41
17464
042601
1100.6106
MEETING EXPENSE
CITY COUNCIL
31,27
17464
042601
1120.6106
MEETING EXPENSE
ADMINISTRATION
6.00
17464
042601
1140.6106
MEETING EXPENSE
PLANNING
30.00
17464
042601
1160.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
FINANCE
40.00
17464
042601
1160.6106
MEETING EXPENSE
FINANCE
4.83
17464
042601
1160.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
FINANCE
67.74
17464
042601
1190.6106
MEETING EXPENSE
ASSESSING
32.21
17464
042601
1190.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ASSESSING
4.47
KEYS /P.W.
17464
042601
1280.6803
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD
8.56
BOOK/P.W.
17464
042601
1301.6406.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
25.00
17464
042601
1490.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
PUBLIC HEALTH
1.25
PARKING
17464
042601
1490.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
PUBLIC HEALTH
9.54
KITCHEN SUPPLIES
17464
042601
1551.6512
PAPER SUPPLIES
CITY HALL GENERAL
42,28
17464
042601
1600.6106
MEETING EXPENSE
PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
10.49
17464
042601
1629.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ADAPTIVE RECREATION
11.50
PARKING /P.W.
17464
042601
5910.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL (BILLING)
12.84
PICTURE FRAMES
17464
042601
5952.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
RECYCLING
,01-
17464
042601
1001.8060
CASH OVER AND UNDER
GENERAL FUND REVENUES
351.38
220980 5/3/01
100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
,75
17390
712386
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
2,591.60
17391
714476
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
112.40-
17392
694012
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
54.75
17542
714471
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
1,762.23
17543
714472
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
4,811.15
17544
714474
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
3,224.80
17545
714475
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
12,332.88
220981 5/3101
102156 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING
268.40
17393
41992
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
602.80
17394
41911
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
1,142.76
17395
41624
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
40.78
17546
41994
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
482.24
17547
41971
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
2,536.98
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA 5/2/01 9:54:36
Council Check Register Page - 20
4/27/01 —5/3/01
PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Account Description Business Unit
17321 042001 2210.6123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSECOMMLINICATIONS
Check #
Date
Amount
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
Vendor
Explanation
220982
5/3/01
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
101110
POLLY NORMAN PHOTOGRAPHY
369086
5862.5513
_ 350.00
VERNON SELLING
17399
ABOUT TOWN PHOTOS
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
350.00
17400
369099
5842.5513
220983
5/3/01
17401
100959
POMMER COMPANY
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
53.9_3
VOLUNTEER RECOGNITION
53.93
220984
5/3/01
102856
PORTHAN, TODD
139.46
FAN, COFFEE MAKER
139.46
220985
5/3/01
102329
POWERPHONE INC.
349.00
DISPATCH SKILLS SEMINAR
349.00
220986
5/3/01
'101487
POWERS INVESTIGATIONS
INC.
1,426.09
SECURITY REVIEW
1,426.09
220987
5/3/01
101811
PREMIER FLEET SERVICES
1,273.18
LABOR, PAINT, PARTS
1,273.18
220988
5/3/01
100966
PRINTERS SERVICE INC
36.00
SHARPENING
36.00
220989
5/3101
100968
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
345.14
246.60
873.59
51.70
120.40
833.65
2,471.08
220990
5/3101
101744
QUALITY FLOW SYSTEMS
1,384.50
PHONE DIALER
1,384.50
17465 48326
17426 042501
17322 14090
1500.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
CONTINGENCIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
17518 009724 5210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GOLF DOME PROGRAM
17466 15136 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
17467 177924 1648.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE
17396
369094
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
17397
369093
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
17398
369086
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
17399
369091
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
17400
369099
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
17401
369100
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
17323 8967 5911.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER
CITY OF EDINA
5/2101 9:54:36
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 21
4/27/01 -5/3/01
Check # Date
Amount
Vendor Explanation PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Account Description
Business Unit
220991 5/3/01
100971 QUALITY WINE
1,671.65
17402
954839 -00
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
16.53-
17402
954839-00
5840.4408
TRADE DISCOUNTS
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
3,818.30
17403
955185 -00
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
75.77-
17403
955185-00
5840.4408
TRADE DISCOUNTS
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
3,986.45
17404
954786 -00
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
39.52-
17404
954786 -00
5840.4408
TRADE DISCOUNTS
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
1,899.64
17405
955051 -00
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
37.79-
17405
955051 -00
5860.4408
TRADE DISCOUNTS
VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
1,567.90
17406
955052 -00
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
31.15-
17406
955052 -00
5820.4408
TRADE DISCOUNTS
50TH STREET GENERAL
999.50
17407
954840 -00
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
9,88-
17407
954840 -00
5820.4408
TRADE DISCOUNTS
50TH STREET GENERAL
2,029.72
17408
954974 -00
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
20.08-
17408
954974 -00
5860.4408
TRADE DISCOUNTS
VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
95.95
17548
955361 -00
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
.96-
17548
955361 -00
5820.4408
TRADE DISCOUNTS
50TH STREET GENERAL
10.00-
17549
953801 -00
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
15,827.43
220992 5/3/01
101965 QWEST
59.32
PAYPHONE 17324
041901
1550.6188
TELEPHONE
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
59.32
220993 5/3/01
103478 QWEST
55.25
17468
14562 4/2510
1470.6188
TELEPHONE
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
1
85.48
17468
14562 -4/25/0
1481.6188
TELEPHONE
YORK FIRE STATION
1
5,147.34
17468
14562- 4 /25 /0
1550.6188
TELEPHONE
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
1
172.05
17468
145624/25/0
1622.6188
TELEPHONE
SKATING & HOCKEY
1
274.27
17468
14562 -4/25/0
1646.6188
TELEPHONE
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
1
250.00
17468
145624/25/0
5420.6188
TELEPHONE
CLUB HOUSE
1
263.12
17468
14562 - 4/25/0
5511.6188
TELEPHONE
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
1
207.42
17468
145624/25/0
5610.6188
TELEPHONE
ED ADMINISTRATION
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check # Date Amount Vendor
374.14
1,166.96
125.56
94.52
Explanation
220994
5/3/01
104436
RAPID SHOE REPAIR
Council Check Register P
117.90
Page - 22
4/27/01 –5/3/01
RESOLED WORK BOOTS
117.90
PO # Doc No I
Inv No A
Account No A
220995
5/3/01
102794
REHRIG PACIFIC COMPANY
17468 1
_ 100.94
5911.6188 T
TELEPHONE P
RECYCLE BIN WHEELS
1
100.94
17468 1
220996
513/01
TELEPHONE G
104445
RETAIL DATA SYSTEMS OF MINNESO
1
31.24
17468 1
CASH REGISTER RIBBON
5821.6188 T
TELEPHONE 5
31.24
1
220997
5/3/01
17468 1
101979
ROFIDAL, KEVIN
TELEPHONE Y
YORK OCCUPANCY
14.00
CONT. ED. (MEALS)
17468 1
14562- 4/25/0 5
14.00
TELEPHONE V
VERNON OCCUPANCY
220998
5/3/01
100485
SAFECO INSURANCE CO.
1001 1
1470.6558 D
DEPT UNIFORMS F
350.00
17223 K
KE50902 5
AMBULANCE OVERPAYM
GENERAL SUPPLIES R
RECYCLING
350.00
220999
5/3/01
103836
SCHEERER, DAN
1,375.00
STATION 2 REMODELING
1,375.00
221000
5/3/01
100995
SEH
1,689.17
PROJECT AEDINA0004.00
1,525.15
PROJECT AEDINA0003.00
3,214.32
CITY OF EDINA 5
5/2101 9:54:36
Council Check Register P
Page - 22
4/27/01 –5/3/01
PO # Doc No I
Inv No A
Account No A
Account Description B
Business Unit
1
17468 1
14562- 4/25/0 5
5911.6188 T
TELEPHONE P
PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER
1
17468 1
14562 - 4125/0 5
5932.6188 T
TELEPHONE G
GENERAL STORM SEWER
1
17468 1
14562 -4/2510 5
5821.6188 T
TELEPHONE 5
50TH ST OCCUPANCY
1
17468 1
14562 -4/25/0 5
5841.6188 T
TELEPHONE Y
YORK OCCUPANCY
1
17468 1
14562- 4/25/0 5
5861.6188 T
TELEPHONE V
VERNON OCCUPANCY
1
17432 1
1001 1
1470.6558 D
DEPT UNIFORMS F
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
17223 K
KE50902 5
5952.6406 G
GENERAL SUPPLIES R
RECYCLING
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
4/27/01 -5/3/01
Check # Date Amount Vendor Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No
221001 5/3/01 104370 SENRICK, LAURA
67.51 UNIFORM REIMBURSEMENT 17469 042701
73.86
17420 050301
17329 14160
Account No Account Description
1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
5/2101 9:54:36
Page - 23
Business Unit
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM
5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE
17209 11998061 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING
17330
118422
67.51
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
221002
5/3/01
5842.5514
100834
SHEPARD, JOHN
17410
118530
100.00
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
POLICE SERVICE
17411
118523
100.00
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
221003
5/3/01
5822.5514
100999
SIGNAL SYSTEMS INC.
36.85
CAP RACK
36.85
221004
5/3/01
101690
SIMPLEX TIME RECORDER CO
_ 35.68
TIME CLOCK PRINT RIBBONS
35.68
221005
5/3/01
101002
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS INC
38.85
5,196.95
60.45
11.25
528.95
5,836.45
221006
5/3101
101023
SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CABLE COMMI
42.56
EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
97.20
EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT
139.76
221007
5/3101
102634
STATE CHEMICAL MANUFACTURING C
570.14
CLEANING SUPPLIES
570.14
221008
5/3101
101015
STREICHERS
28.70
MOUTHPIECES - INTOX
45.16
STROBE LIGHT TUBE
110.00-
CREDIT
110.00
SQUAD EQUIPT LABOR
73.86
17420 050301
17329 14160
Account No Account Description
1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
5/2101 9:54:36
Page - 23
Business Unit
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM
5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE
17209 11998061 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING
17330
118422
5430.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
17409
118529
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
17410
118530
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
17411
118523
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
17412
118522
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
17331 200126 2201.4025 FRANCHISE FEE
17332 200131 2201.4025 FRANCHISE FEE
17428 91114024 1470.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES
COMMUNICATION REVENUES
COMMUNICATION REVENUES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
17333
219586.1
1400.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
17334
216986.1
1553.6585
ACCESSORIES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
17335
217702.1
1400.6215
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
17336
217658.1
1400.6215
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check #
Date
Amount
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
Vendor
Explanation
221009
5/3/01
4/27/01 -5/3/01
101017
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
PO # Doc No
Inv No
212.54
Account Description
17470
MODULE
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
16.71
168395CVW
1553.6530
HANDLE
17472
167696CVW
41.39
REPAIR PARTS
HEATER PK
270.64
221010
5/3/01
101020
SUBURBAN TIRE & AUTO
890.52
TIRES
890.52
221011
5/3/01
100900
SUN NEWSPAPERS
615.60
WANT AD
157.30
AD FOR BID
42.90
PUBLISH ORDINANCE
815.80
221012
5/3/01
100794
SWANSON, HAROLD
100.00
POLICE SERVICE
100.00
221013
513/01
101326
TERMINAL SUPPLY CO
575.03
FUSES, TAPE, WIRE
575.03
221014
5/3/01
104182
TOPPERS & MORE
22.79
TOPPER CLAMPS
22.79
221015
5/3/01
101706
TRACYITRIPP FUELS
1,612.40
GAS
1,612.40
221016
5/3/01
101045
TURF SUPPLY COMPANY
330.20
FLAG POLES
330.20
221017
5/3101
101360
TWIN CITY HARDWARE
2,373.89
DOORS FOR STATION 2
2,373.89
221018
5/3/01
102150
TWIN CITY SEED CO.
CITY OF EDINA
050301
1419.6102
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
Council Check Register
17211
15186 -00
1553.6530
4/27/01 -5/3/01
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Account Description
17470
168556CVW
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
17471
168395CVW
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
17472
167696CVW
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
17473 146833 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES
5/2/01 9:54:36
Page - 24
Business Unit
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
17210 410188 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
17520 410791 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION
17521 411306 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION
17419
050301
1419.6102
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
RESERVE PROGRAM
17211
15186 -00
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
17233
988050
1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
17212
83304
5422.6581
GASOLINE
17337 080545 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
17430 907215 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
4/27/01 —5/3/01
PO # Doc No Inv No
17213 3843
Check #
Date
Amount
103590 VALLEY -RICH CO. INC.
Vendor
Explanation
2,794.00
WATER MAIN REPAIR
149.10
CENTENNIAL LAKES
2,794.00
SEED
221024
5/3/01
149.10
104394 VANCE, LINDSEY
221019
5/3/01
100363
U S BANCORP
221025
5/3/01
68.53
103936 VANGUARD APPRAISALS INC.
12,945.00
CONTRACT PAYMENT
859.05
12,945.00
NLC HOTEL
221026
5/3/01
1,099.01
102970 VERIZON WIRELESS BELLEVUE
NLC HOTEL
134.96
2,026.59
6.08
221020
5/3/01
103248
ULLRICH, CINDY
53.44
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
53.44
221021
5/3/01
101073
UNITED RENTALS INC.
656.52
NEON SAFETY VESTS
656.52
221022
5/3/01
101055
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
90.00
SOIL TESTING - ACCT# 3908
221023
5/3/01
1301.6610
103590 VALLEY -RICH CO. INC.
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
17218
2,794.00
WATER MAIN REPAIR
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CENTENNIAL LAKES
2,794.00
221024
5/3/01
104394 VANCE, LINDSEY
140.00
ADAPTIVE PROGRAM STAFF
140.00
221025
5/3/01
103936 VANGUARD APPRAISALS INC.
12,945.00
CONTRACT PAYMENT
12,945.00
221026
5/3/01
102970 VERIZON WIRELESS BELLEVUE
134.96
6.08
Account No Account Description
5422.6251 SHARED MAINTENANCE
512/01 9:54:36
Page - 25
Business Unit
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
17556 483349600545 1120.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ADMINISTRATION
2508 -4/5
17556 483349600545 1100.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CITY COUNCIL
2508 -4/5
17556 483349600545 1120.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION
2508-4/5
17483 042701 5610.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ED ADMINISTRATION
17214
007025
1301.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
17218
STLI- 042001
5630.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CENTENNIAL LAKES
17474 4150
17522 042601
17221 040101
5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION
1629.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADAPTIVE RECREATION
1190.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ASSESSING
17475 1003.569063 1495.6188 TELEPHONE INSPECTIONS
4/10
17475 1003- 569063 1490.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC HEALTH
4/10
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
5/2/01 9:54:36
Council Check Register
Page - 26
4/27/01 -5/3/01
Check # Date
Amount
Vendor
Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Account Description
Business Unit
242.73
17475
1003 - 569063
1470.6188
TELEPHONE
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
4/10
53.20
17475
1003 - 569063
1120.6188
TELEPHONE
ADMINISTRATION
4/10
29.49
17475
1003 - 569063
2210.6188
TELEPHONE
COMMUNICATIONS
4/10
68.67
17475
1003. 569063
1600.6188
TELEPHONE
PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
4/10
96.96
17475
1003- 569063
1640.6188
TELEPHONE
PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL
4/10
8.21
17475
1003 - 569063
1640.6188
TELEPHONE
PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL
4/10
7.22
17475
1003 - 569063
5420.6188
TELEPHONE
CLUB HOUSE
4/10
258.15
17475
1003 - 569063
5913.6188
TELEPHONE
DISTRIBUTION
4/10
195.90
17475
1003 - 569063
1260.6188
TELEPHONE
ENGINEERING GENERAL
4/10
183.39
17475
1003 - 569063
1280.6188
TELEPHONE
SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD
4/10
463.36
17476
1003 - 2548075
1410.6188
TELEPHONE
PATROL
4/10
253.38
17476
1003 - 2548075
1411.6188
TELEPHONE
INVESTIGATION
4/10
28.19
17476
1003 - 2548075
1450.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ANIMAL CONTROL
4110
2,029.89
221027 5/3/01
101061 VICTORY CORPS
97.47
FLAG
17338
056619
5430.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
97.47
221028 5/3/01
101932 VOTH, BART
23.00
C WATER LICENSE
17339
042501
5919.6260
LICENSES & PERMITS
TRAINING
23.00
221029 5/3101
102023 WAGNER, DOUGLAS
20.00
CONT. ED. (MEALS)
17340
042501
1400.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
10.00
CONT. ED. (MEALS)
17523
042701
1400.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
30.00
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor
Explanation
221030
5/3/01
5842.5513
101080 WALSH, WILLIAM
YORK SELLING
162.70
058558
100.00
5/3/01
POLICE SERVICE
100352 WINSTAR BROADBAND SERVICES
058559
100.00
162.00
CDPD - CONNECT -COPS
221031
5/3101
162.00
102020 WELLS, GARY
221037
5/3/01
23.00
B WATER LICENSE
56.04
SCREWS, WASHERS
23.00
56.04
221032
5/3/01
5/3/01
101077 WEST WELD SUPPLY CO.
101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC
99.45
COUPLINGS, BITS
702.25
99.45
221033
513/01
221039
101078 WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT
104429 WOTHE, KAYE
643.46
FLEET KEYS
643.46
221034
5/3101
101033 WINE COMPANY, THE
189.33-
713.70
221035
5/3/01
5822.5513
101312 WINE MERCHANTS
50TH ST SELLING
17413
162.70
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
162.70
058558
221036
5/3/01
VERNON SELLING
100352 WINSTAR BROADBAND SERVICES
058559
5822.5513
162.00
CDPD - CONNECT -COPS
162.00
221037
5/3/01
102492 WIRTGEN AMERICA
56.04
SCREWS, WASHERS
56.04
221038
5/3/01
101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC
1,217.30
702.25
1,919.55
221039
5/3/01
104429 WOTHE, KAYE
CITY OF EUiNA 5/2/01 9:54:36
Council Check Register Page - 27
4/27/01 —5/3/01
PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Account Description Business Unit
17418 050301 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM
17341 042301 5919.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS
17342 38906 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES
17477 0010383 -IN 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS
TRAINING
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
17250
058267
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
17413
058560
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
17414
058558
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
17550
058559
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
17551 42155 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
17343
712595
4606.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
COPS MORE GRANT
17344
62637
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
17552 105404 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
17553 105469 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
4127/01 —5/3/01
Check # Date Amount Vendor Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Account Description
26.50 TENNIS LESSON REFUND 17225 042301 1001.4390 REGISTRATION FEES
26.50
221040 513101 101087 WROBLESKI, HENRY
100.00 POLICE SERVICE
100.00
221041 5/3101 100568 XEROX CORPORATION
765.00 COPIER MONTHLY BASE - MARCH
761,697.97 Grand Total
5/2101 9:54:36
Page - 28
Business Unit
GENERAL FUND REVENUES
17423 050301 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM
17215 081451885 1550.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL
Payment Instrument Totals
Check Total 761,697.97
Total Payments 761,697.97
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
R55CKSUM LOG20000
Company
Amount
01000 GENERAL FUND
183,150.26
02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND
593.80
04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND
3,047.00
04800 CONSTRUCTION FUND
807.70
05200 GOLF DOME FUND
1,426.09
05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND
4,953.23
05400 GOLF COURSE FUND
16,222.20
05500 ICE ARENA FUND
855.79
05600 EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND
5,534.52
05800 LIQUOR FUND
97,698.86
05900 UTILITY FUND
26,465.75
05930 STORM SEWER FUND
828.99
05950 RECYCLING FUND
113.78
09900 PAYROLL FUND
420,000.00
Report Totals 761,697.97
CITY OF EDiNA 5/2101
Council Check Summary Page -
4/27/01 - 5/3/01
We confirm to the best of our knowledge
and belief, that these claims
comply in all material respects
with the requirements of the City
of Edina purchasing policies and
proce to V- -3 !�
Fi
City Manager
10:01:05
1
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check _# Date Amount Vendor Explanation
221042 5/4/01 102745 FREUND, JEFF
360.00 CHAPERONES FOR EVENI
360.00
221043 5/4101 104449 PACIFIC SOFTWARE INTERNATIONAL
595.00 WINDOWS UPGRADE
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
5/4/01 -5/10/01
PO # Doc No Inv No
17790 050201
5/10/01 9:14:19
Page- 1
Account No Account Description Business Unit
5610.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ED ADMINISTRATION
17791 TRAINING 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
OFFICER 2000
221044
5/10/01
102234 ABDELLA, PAUL
204.00
INSTRUCTOR AC
17987
050101
5110.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
204.00
221045
5/10/01
100617 ADAMS PEST CONTROL
5.11
PEST CONTROL
17986
14063
5421.6230
SERVICE CONTRACTS EOUIPMENTGRILL
5.11
221046
5/10/01
102609 ALL SAINTS BRANDS
571.78
17670
00023903
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
405.50
17816
00024093
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
357.50
17817
00024092
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
417.80
17913
00024227
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
12.00
17913
00024227
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
1,764.58
221047
5110/01
101478 AMSTERDAM PRINTING &
LITHO
133.50
LOGO PENS
17622
560770
5822.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
50TH ST SELLING
267.00
LOGO PENS
17622
560770
5842.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
YORK SELLING
133.50
LOGO PENS
17622
560770
5862.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
VERNON SELLING
534.00
221048
5/10/01
101548 ANDERSON, TOM
174.40
REFRIG & MICROWAVE REIMBURSE
17727
050201
5424.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
RANGE
174.40
221049
5/10/01
101124 ANDY S MARKET & DELI
122.00
DINNER MEETING
17623
050101
1100.6106
MEETING EXPENSE
CITY COUNCIL
2,210.94
VOLUNTEER RECEPTION
17624
042401
1500.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CONTINGENCIES
154.00
DINNER MEETING
17728
041801
1100.6106
MEETING EXPENSE
CITY COUNCIL
2,486.94
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
5/4/01 -5/10/01
PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Account Description
17988 113404 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor
Explanation
221050
5/10/01
5510.6105
102172 APPERrS FOODSERVICE
ARENA ADMINISTRATION
17991
810512
305.50
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
FOOD
17992
819650
305.50
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
221051
5/10/01
5440.5511
100632 AQUA ENGINEERING
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
17793
16185
200.40
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
COUPLINGS, PIPE, CLAMPS
17794
16183
200.40
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
FIELD MAINTENANCE
221052
5/10/01
1551.6182
103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT
SRVCS
17559
26391
253.00
RUBBISH REMOVAL
COFFEE
17559
26391
253.00
RUBBISH REMOVAL
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
221053
5/10/01
1470.6182
103220 ASCAP
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
17559
26391
560.00
RUBBISH REMOVAL
MUSIC LICENSE
17559
26391
560.00
RUBBISH REMOVAL
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
221054
5/10/01
5210.6182
102134 ASHWORTH INC.
GOLF DOME PROGRAM
17559
26391
319.57
RUBBISH REMOVAL
SHIRTS
17559
26391
719.45
RUBBISH REMOVAL
SHIRTS
17559
26391
1,658.09
RUBBISH REMOVAL
SHIRTS
17569
26391
1,586.31
RUBBISH REMOVAL
SHIRTS
16.75
SHIRT
221055 5/10101
221056 5/10/01
100375 ASPEN ENVIRONMENTAL
58.78 RESTROOM RENTAL
58.78 RESTROOM RENTAL
382.68
102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS
DUMPSTERS FOR CLEAN UP
17729 049487 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
5/10/01 9:14:19
Page - 2
Business Unit
GRILL
SNOW & ICE REMOVAL
17792
6013 - 177966
1551.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CITY HALL GENERAL
17557
046
5510.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
ARENA ADMINISTRATION
17989
823963
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
17990
823973
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
17991
810512
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
17992
819650
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
17993
815354
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
17793
16185
1642.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
FIELD MAINTENANCE
17794
16183
1642.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
FIELD MAINTENANCE
17559
26391
1551.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
CITY HALL GENERAL
17559
26391
1301.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
17559
26391
1552.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
17559
26391
1470.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
17559
26391
1481.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
YORK FIRE STATION
17559
26391
5511.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
17559
26391
5210.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
GOLF DOME PROGRAM
17559
26391
5422.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
17559
26391
1645.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
LITTER REMOVAL
17559
26391
5420.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
CLUB HOUSE
17569
26391
5111.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT
. `
CITY OF EDINA
5/10!01 9:14:19
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 3
5/4/01 -5/10/01
Check # Date Amount Vendor
Explanation PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Account Description
Business Unit
17559
26391
1645.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
LITTER REMOVAL
17559
26391
5311.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
POOL OPERATION
17559
26391
5620.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
EDINBOROUGH PARK
17559
26391
5861.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
VERNON OCCUPANCY
17559
26391
5841.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
YORK OCCUPANCY
17559
26391
5821.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
50TH ST OCCUPANCY
17559
26391
1645.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
LITTER REMOVAL
17559
26391
5430.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
382.67
DUMPSTERS FOR CLEAN UP 17559
26391
1302.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
SPRING CLEANUP
765.35
221057 5/10/01 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS
206.82
17995
1- 079716
1551.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
CITY HALL GENERAL
5101101
453.59
17995
1- 079716
1301.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
5/01 /01
453.58
17995
1- 079716
1552.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
5/01/01
122.06
17995
1- 079716
1470.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
5/01101
42.48
17995
1- 079716
1481.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
YORK FIRE STATION
5/01/01
422.99
17995
1- 079716
5511.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS
5/01/01
45.29-
17995
1- 079716
5210.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
GOLF DOME PROGRAM
5/01/01
221.64
17995
1- 079716
5422.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
5/01/01
390.62
17995
1- 079716
1645.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
LITTER REMOVAL
5/01/01
559.43
17995
1 -079716
5420.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
CLUB HOUSE
5/01/01
43.34
17995
1- 079716
5111.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT
5/01/01
308.12
17995
1 -079716
1645.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
LITTER REMOVAL
5/01/01
241.66
17995
1- 079716
5311.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
POOL OPERATION
5/01/01
676.83
17995
1- 079716
5620.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
EDINBOROUGH PARK
5/01 /01
85.62
17995
1- 079716
5861.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
VERNON OCCUPANCY
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check # Date Amount
74.08
30.74
81.43
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
5/4/01 —5/10/01
5/10/01
5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES
104091
Vendor Explanation PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Account Description
17795
5/01/01
5932.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
GENERAL STORM SEWER
17995
1- 079716
5841.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
5/10/01
5/01/01
102472
AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES
17995
1 -079716
5821.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
COPS - CDPD
5/01/01
882.00
17995
1- 079716
1645.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
5/01/01
AUGIE'S INC.
17995
1 -079716
5430.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
5/01/01
37.62
221058
5/10/01
5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES
104091
ASSOCIATION OF TRAINING OFFICE
2327354 -88
04258.1705.2000NSULTING DESIGN
55.00
17795
HOSTAGE NEG. FOCUS GROUP
5932.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
GENERAL STORM SEWER
55.00
221059
5/10/01
102472
AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES
882.00
COPS - CDPD
882.00
221060
5/10/01
101954
AUGIE'S INC.
85.41
SANDWICHES
37.62
SANDWICHES
6.48-
CREDIT
116.55
221061
5/10/01
100877
AUTO MACHINE AND SUPPLY CO.
117.33
MISC. PARTS
117.33
221062
5 /10 /01
102615
BADGER METER INC
2,662.50
UTILITY SERVICE AGREEMENT
2,662.50
221063
5/10/01
103937
BAKER, ELIZABETH
115.21
CRAFT SUPPLIES
115.21
221064
5/10/01
100643
BARR ENGINEERING CO.
516.91
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
190.26
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
707.17
17844 2778
17845 042501
17996 10677
17997 10668
17998 10672
17730 D15605
17731 570248
5/10/01 9:14:19
Page - 4
Business Unit
YORK OCCUPANCY
50TH ST OCCUPANCY
LITTER REMOVAL
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
4606.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COPS MORE GRANT
5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD
5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD
5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD
5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
GRILL
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
CENTENNIAL LAKES
5900.1357 INVENTORY WATER METER UTILITY BALANCE SHEET
17999
050101
5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
17795
2327354 -88
04258.1705.2000NSULTING DESIGN
T258PAMELA PARK/LAKE STORM
17795
2327354 -88
5932.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
GENERAL STORM SEWER
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check # Date Amount Vendor
221065 5/10101 102257 BEACH'S AWARDS
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
5/4/01 -5/10/01
Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No
PLAQUES 18000 043001
221066 5110/01 100645 BEACON BALLFIELDS
212.14 SOIL SIFTER, WINDSCREEN
- -- 212.14
221067 5/10/01 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION
56.40
1.839.45
221068
5/10/01
1642.6406
103712 BERNADAS WINES SELECTION INC.
FIELD MAINTENANCE
17671
216.80
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
216.80
21218600
221069
5/10/01
VERNON SELLING
100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS
21219200
5842.5513
36.88
BOARD PLANNER
17627
8715210
125.98
BINDING COVER
17627
8715210
33.80
OFFICE SUPPLIES
17732
CM8700980
27.68
OFFICE SUPPLIES
17733
8720671
38.77
OFFICE SUPPLIES
131.00
OFFICE SUPPLIES
149.95
OFFICE SUPPLIES
94.79-
OFFICE SUPPLIES
14.54
OFFICE SUPPLIES
463.81
221070
5/10/01
100649 BEST BUY COMPANY INC.
211.34
CAMCORDER, TRIPOD
325.41
PHOTO PAPER, INK
51.94
CD AUDIO, "1/" 4 PACKS
372.21
DUAL TRAY, CD PLAYER
960.90
221071
5/10/01
104465 BEST WESTERN KELLY INN
247.04
INV 207754, 207755, 350866
247.04
Account No Account Description
5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
5/10/01 9:14:19
Page - 5
Business Unit
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
17625
334919
1642.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
FIELD MAINTENANCE
17671
33799600
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
17672
21218600
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
17673
21219200
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
17914 375 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
17560
8701331
1400.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
17561
8725900
1550.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
17626
8720670
1260.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
17626
8720670
1180.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
17626
8720670
1553.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
17627
8715210
1160.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
17627
8715210
1550.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
17732
CM8700980
1180.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
17733
8720671
1260.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
ENGINEERING GENERAL
ELECTION
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
FINANCE
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
ELECTION
ENGINEERING GENERAL
17562
0050409726
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
17563
0050409363
5110.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
17564
0050408273
5125.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MEDIA STUDIO
17564
0050408273
5125.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
MEDIA STUDIO
17846 AWARDS CONF. 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
5/4/01 —5/10/01
PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Account Description
17847 24934 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES
Check #
Date
Amount
ROAD OIL
Vendor
Explanation
221072
5/10/01
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
104053
BIOCLEAN MOBILE WASH INC.
687.46
VEHICLE CLEANING
687.46
221073
5/10101
100653
BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS
745.06
ASPHALT
325.35
ASPHALT
1,070.41
221074
5/10101
100659
BOYER TRUCK PARTS
48.92
SENDER ASSEMBLY
48.92
221075
5/10/01
104464
BREWER, NICHOLE
800.00
RENTAL DEPOSIT REFUND
800.00
221076
5/10/01
104470
BRIDGESTONE SPORTS (USA)
214.56
GOLF BALLS
214.56
221077
5 /10 /01
100665
BRISSMAN- KENNEDY INC.
88.61
CLEANING SUPPLIES
88.61
221078
5/10/01
100667
BROCK WHITE COMPANY
1,555.71
JOINT SEALANT
1,555.71
221079
5/10/01
101489
BROOKS, DARLENE
348.00
INSTRUCTOR AC
348.00
221080
5/10/01
104463
BRUCCIANI, FRED
27.00
SKATING LESSON REFUND
27.00
221081
5/10/01
102398
BUDGET PROJECTOR REPAIR
67.00
REPAIRS
25.00
REPAIRS
17848 81467 1301.6518 BLACKTOP
17849 81494 1301.6518 BLACKTOP
17850 266384 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS
17851 050301 5601.4554 EDINBOROUGH PARK
5/10/01 9:14:19
Page - 6
Business Unit
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EB /CL REVENUES
18001 835565 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
17628 673570 1551.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL
17852
EG14778801
1301.6519
ROAD OIL
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
18002
050101
5110.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
17853 050301 5610.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ED ADMINISTRATION
17565 1486 5125.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS MEDIA STUDIO
17566 1485 5125.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS MEDIA STUDIO
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check # Date Amount Vendor Explanation
92.00
221082 5/10/01 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF
1,029.46 GOLF CLUBS
1,029.46
221083 5/10/01 102051 CAMPBELL GROUP, THE
939.95 UNIFORM SHIRTS
1,083.00 UNIFORM SHIRTS
221084 5110/01 100678 CARLSON PRINTING
117.68 BUSINESS CARDS
173.49 BUSINESS CARDS
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
5/4/01 —5/10/01
PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Account Description
5/10/01 9:14:19
Page - 7
Business Unit
18003 96140560 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
17854 200590 5620.6201 LAUNDRY
17855 200596 5630.6201 LAUNDRY
17734 00076577 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
17735 00076576 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH PARK
CENTENNIAL LAKES
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
221085
5/10/01
100681
CATCO
117.18
REPAIR CYLINDERS
17856
3 -58673
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
54.27
FITTINGS
17857
3 -58957
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
171.45
221086
5/10/01
102123
CIT GROUP /COMMERCIAL SERVICES,
1,573.07
MERCHANDISE
18004
185730
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
53.22
MERCHANDISE
18005
59978
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
1,626.29
221087
5/10/01
101663
CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF
50.00
2001 DUES
17796
041101
1260.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
ENGINEERING GENERAL
50.00
221088
5/10/01
100684
CITY OF BLOOMINGTON
5,000.00
TOBACCO FREE COMMUNITIES GRANT
17629
1/01/01 -06 /3
4083.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
TOBACCO FREE GRANT
0/01
5,000.00
221089
5/10/01
100087
CITY OF ST. PAUL
105.00
GRAFFITI SYMPOSIUM
17858
068154
1400.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
105.00
221090
5/10/01
103141
CMI INC.
46.13
MOUTHPIECES
17568
609423
1400.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
5/4/01 -5/10/01
PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Account Description
Check #
Date
Amount
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
Vendor Explanation
17738
00074497
46.13
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
CITY HALL
221091
5110/01
1500.6406
101507
COIT SERVICES
807.01
CARPET CLEANING
807.01
221092
5/10101
100693
COMMERCIAL FURNITURE BROKERS
53.25
CORNER MAKER
57.80
REMODELING
111.05
221093
5/10/01
101661
COMPLETE BEVERAGE SERVICE
983.56
VOLUNTEER RECEPTION
983.56
221094
5/10/01
101323
CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS
380.29
FLASHLIGHTS, BOOTS
_
40.00
RUBBER BOOTS
420.29
221095
5/10/01
100695
CONTINENTAL CLAY CO.
10.02
SUPPLIES
10.02
221096
5/10/01
100697
COOL AIR MECHANICAL
113.25
REPAIRS
113.25
221097
5/10/01
100698
COPY EQUIPMENT INC.
173.25
SUPPLIES
187.61
BLUEPRINT /CAD
360.86
221098
5/10101
101590
CORNERSTONE
3,775.00
FIRST QUARTER PAYMENT
3,775.00
221099
5/10/01
102121
DATREK PROFESSIONAL BAGS INC
269.76
GOLF BAGS
246.27
GOLF BAGS
516.03
5/10/01 9:14:19
Page - 8
Business Unit
17736 M- 002979 5420.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CLUB HOUSE
17737
00721209
4452.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
CITY HALL
17738
00074497
4452.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
CITY HALL
17630
22038
1500.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CONTINGENCIES
17569 01515031 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT
17739 01518950 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT
17567 043665 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
17570
36803
5521.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
ARENA ICE MAINT
17571
0197907
1260.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ENGINEERING GENERAL
17740
0198238
1260.6548
BLUE PRINTING
ENGINEERING GENERAL
17741 042801 1504.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION
18006 647993 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
18007 648877 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check #
Date
Amount
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
Vendor
Explanation
221100
5/10/01
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
103985
DAVE'S GREAT AD SHOP
133499
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
500.00
17915
133501
DIAL -A -RIDE LOGO
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
500.00
133497
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
221101
5/10/01
133496
102478
DAY DISTRIBUTING
50TH ST SELLING
17918
133500
1,903.20
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
1,061.60
35.00
18.40
1,449.00
852.40
18.40
5,338.00
221102
5/10/01
102455
DEALER AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES INC
58.67
FRONT LINER
58.67
221103
5/10/01
100718
DELEGARD TOOL CO.
51.80
ADJUSTABLE WRENCH
62,29
BATTERY CHARGER
195.96
IMPACT WRENCH
60.34
CHARGER
70.07
SCRIBE, BITS
440.46
221104
5/10/01
100720
DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY
56.65
BAKERY
64,79
BAKERY
32.09
BAKERY
153.53
221105
5/10/01
101473
DEXTER SHOE COMPANY
914.06
SHOES
2,974.87
SHOES
1,184.48
SHOES
237.79
SHOES
969.84-
SHOES
288.00-
SHOES
4,053.36
CITY OF EDINA 5/10/01 9:14:19
Council Check Register Page - 9
5/4/01 -5/10/01
PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Account Description Business Unit
17631 1524 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS
17674
132657
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
17675
133495
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
17676
133499
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
17915
133501
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
17916
133497
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
17917
133496
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
17918
133500
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
17797 4- 055822 -1 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
17572
152933
1553.6556
TOOLS
17573
165124
1553.6556
TOOLS
17574
164916
1553.6556
TOOLS
17575
161971
1553.6556
TOOLS
17576
155910
1553.6556
TOOLS
18008 99697 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD
18009 99677 6421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD
18010 99990 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
GRILL
GRILL
GRILL
18011
188196
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
16012
151100
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
18013
163790
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
18014
168143
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
18015
902140
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
18016
902138
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
R55CKREG LOG20000
372676
5862.5513
CITY OF EDINA
VERNON SELLING
17678
371647
5/10/01 9:14:19
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
17679
560022
5862.5513
Council
Check Register
17818
372686
5842.5513
Page - 10
YORK SELLING
17819
371652
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
5/4101
-5/10/01
371655
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
Check #
Date
Amount
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
Vendor
Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Account Description
Business Unit
221106
5/10/01
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
104460
DNR SIGN SHOP
781200
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
8,166.00
PARK IDENTIFICATION SIGNS
17798
001318
1647.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PATHS & HARD SURFACE
8,166.00
221107
5/10/01
100730
DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP
4,423.50
LEGAL
17632
864322
1195.6131
PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL
LEGAL SERVICES
4,423.50
221108
5/10/01
100731
DPC INDUSTRIES
2,049.71
WATER TREATMENT CHEMICALS
17859
7000 - 1389761
5915.6586
WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES
WATER TREATMENT
3,379.26
WATER TREATMENT CHEMICALS
17860
7000 - 1390062
5915.6586
WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES
WATER TREATMENT
5,428.97
221109
5/10/01
104343
DUNLOP SLAZENGER GROUP AMERICA
60.86
GOLF BAG
18017
2346869
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
432.67
SHIRTS
18018
2345760
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
493.53
221110
5/10/01
100736
E -Z-GO TEXTRON
3.45
CART PART
17577
0737137
5423.6530
REPAIR PARTS
GOLF CARS
3.45
221111
5/10101
104469
EAGLE SCOREBOARD SYSTEMS
2.507.00
SCOREBOARD
18019
1019
5410.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
221112 5110/01 100739 EAGLE WINE
821.65
127.70
8.50-
1,059.30
335.40
364.18
20.06
124.70
2,844.49
221113 5/10/01 100741 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
38.00
28.50
17677
372676
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
17678
371647
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
17679
560022
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
17818
372686
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
17819
371652
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
17820
371655
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
17821
372678
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
17919
372679
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
17680
780653
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
17681
781200
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check # Date Amount Vendor Explanation
4,775.35
12.60
56.80
2,312.95
9,886.95
3,094.62
2,776.55
372.00
23,354.32
221114 5/10/01 100742 ECOLAB PEST ELIMINATION DIVISI
110.23 PEST ELIMINATION
110.23
221115 5/10/01 101905 EDIN, ROSE
INSTRUCTOR AC
CITY OF EDINA
5110/01
Council Check Register
100015
514/01 -5110/01
YORK SELLING
PO # Doc No
Inv No
17682
781202
17683
781756
17684
748615
17822
780611
17920
784219
17921
783649
17922
783647
18020
782518
221116
5110/01
Business Unit
100015
EKLUND TREE RECYCLING
YORK SELLING
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
200.00
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
TREE WASTE DISPOSAL
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
200.00
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
TREE WASTE DISPOSAL
5862.5514
COST OF.GOODS SOLD BEER
600.00
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
TREE WASTE DISPOSAL
5421.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
740.00
TREE WASTE DISPOSAL
1,740.00
221117
5110/01
102865
ELECTION SYSTEMS & SOFTWARE IN
4,790.45
SPECIAL ELECTION BALLOTS
4,790.45
221118
5/10/01
100748
ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY
145.12
AIR MASKS FOR POOL
35.00
AIR MASK TESTING
105.00
AIR MASK TESTING
70.00
FITNESS TESTING
355.12
221119
5/10/01
100018
EXPERT T BILLING
3,196.00
APRIL BILLS
3,196.00
221120
5/10/01
104471
FAHEY, TARA
5/10/01 9:14:19
Page - 11
Account No
Account Description
Business Unit
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
5862.5514
COST OF.GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
5421.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
GRILL
17861 7579912 5620.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENTEDINBOROUGH PARK
18021 042401
17799 050101
17799 050101
17799 050101
17799 050101
17862 459421
5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
5630.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CENTENNIAL LAKES
5620.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
EDINBOROUGH PARK
5422.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
1644.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
TREES & MAINTENANCE
1184.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SPECIAL ELECTIONS
17633
42100 -00
5311.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
POOL OPERATION
17634
42161 -00
5311.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
POOL OPERATION
17635
42160 -00
1646.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
17800
42633 -00
5311.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
POOL OPERATION
17863 050301 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
CITY OF EDINA
5/10/01 9:14:19
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council
Check Register
Page - 12
5/4/01
-5/10/01
Check # Date
Amount
Vendor
Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Account Description
Business Unit
630.00
INSTRUCTOR AC
18022
050101
5110.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
630.00
221121 5/10/01
100297 FAST FOTO & DIGITAL
60.61
PHOTO PROCESSING
17636
T2 -87492
2210.6408
PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
COMMUNICATIONS
213.00
ABOUT TOWN PHOTOGRAPHY
17742
T2 -86857
2210.6123
MAGAZINE /NEWSLETTER EXPENSELOMMUNICATIONS
273.61
221122 5/10/01
102003 FASTSIGNS BLOOMINGTON
15.86
SIGN LETTERING
17864
B17808
5620.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH PARK
15.86
221123 5/10/01
102015 FLOWERS OF EDINA
157.17
VOLUNTEER RECOGNITION
18023
3578
1500.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CONTINGENCIES
59.64
VOLUNTEER RECOGNITION
18024
3573
1500.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CONTINGENCIES
66.58
SYMPATHY BASKET
18025
3550
1100.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CITY COUNCIL
283.39
221125 5/10/01
101475 FOOTJOY
142.62
SHOES
7248
3903697
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
1,332.07-
MERCHANDISE
7249
6707577
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
97.26
SHOES
7250
3915934
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
166.88
SHOES
7251
3930045
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
97.26
SHOES
7252
3933546
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
88.00
SHOES
7253
3936093
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
259.39
SHIRTS
7254
3939070
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
97.52
SHOES
7255
3954216
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
63.66
SHOES
7256
3978623
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
610.80-
SHOES- CREDIT
7257
6724731
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
492.00-
SHOES- CREDIT
7258
6725087
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
523.20-
SHOES- CREDIT
7259
6725002
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
539.40-
SHOES- CREDIT
7260
6725014
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
55.26
SHOES
7497
4007754
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
143.45
SHOES
7498
4015637
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
1,101.65
SHOES
18026
4150323
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
976.23
BELTS
18027
4147383
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
54.37
SHOES
18028
4250885
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
5,089.91
GLOVES
18029
4148550
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
15,834.12
SHOES
18030
4148551
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS- PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
704.29
GOLF BALLS
18031
4222225
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
120.95
HATS
18032
4149812
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check # Date Amount
Vendor Explanation
335.48
SHOES
679.68
- SHOES
516.11
SHOE TREES
97.39
SHOES
67.66
SHOES
1,764.50-
SHOE CREDIT
217.60-
SHOE CREDIT
2,718.80-
SHOE CREDIT
18,590.77
Business Unit
221126 5/10/01
104446 FORM RESERVATIONS INC.
2.400.00
ON -SITE TRAINING
CITY OF EDINA
5/10/01 9:14:19
Council Check Register
Page - 13
5/4/01 -5/10/01
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Account Description
Business Unit
18033
4181464
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
18034
4179157
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
18035
4203603
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
18036
4179683
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
18037
4173215
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
18038
6743823
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
18039
6743963
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
18040
6743887
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
17751 2894 -3 5440.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
221127 5/10/01 102380 FORMS GROUP, THE
284.67 PROPERTY INVENTORY REPORT FORM 17578 00003062 1400.6575 PRINTING
391.12 ARREST REPORT FORMS 17579 00003060 1400.6575 PRINTING
284.09 AUTOMOBILE IMPOUND REPORT FORM 17580 00003061 1400.6575 PRINTING
221128 5110101 101022 FRAME, SUSAN
1,375.0_0 INSTRUCTOR AC
1,375.00
221129 5/10/01 104451 FRANK J. ZAMBONI & CO. INC.
70,600.00 NEW ICE RESURFACER
70,600.00
221130 5110/01 102432 FREEWAY RADIATOR SERVICE
45.00 CLEAN & TEST RADIATOR
221131 5/10/01 104071 FREUND, JEFF
254.41
254.41
221132 5/10/01 102076 G & K TEAM WEAR
151.16
27.25
178.41
EDINBOROUGH PK PETTY CASH
UNIFORM
UNIFORM
18041 050101
17581 84315
17743 28642
17865 050401
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
5500.1740 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET
1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS
5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
17582 3097008 1646.6201 LAUNDRY
17866 3097186 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EDINBOROUGH PARK
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
ENGINEERING GENERAL
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check # Date Amount Vendor
221133 5/10/01 104468 GLAS, JOHN
1 Rn_nn
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
5/4/01 -5/10/01
Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No
GRILL CONTRACT CLEANING 18042 042901
BANQUET CLEANING 18042 042901
221134
5/10/01
5862.5513
102670
GRAND PERE WINES INC
17925
38614
5862.5513
250.50
VERNON SELLING
17867
1041015138
5630.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
486.00
17868
1041017215
1552.6530
REPAIR PARTS
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
736.50
1041030252
5620.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
221135
5/10/01
50TH ST SELLING
102217
GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC
50TH ST SELLING
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
218.00
315.00
533.00
221136
5/10/01
100783
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO.
325.21
BULBS
95.11
120V CONTACTOR
440.78
BULBS
861.10
221137
5/10/01
100782
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
321.20
224.40-
53.15
68.95
1,344.12
5,465.80
149.50
49.30
515.72
28.70
61.20
7,833.24
221138
5/10/01
104459
GS DIRECT
125.67
CALCULATORS
125.67
221139
5/10/01
102060
HALLOCK COMPANY INC
373.73
PHASE MONITORS
17923 00008315
17924 00008316
5/10/01 9:14:19
Page - 14
Account No Account Description Business Unit
5420.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENTCLUB HOUSE
5421.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENTGRILL
5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
17685
38458
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
17925
38614
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
17867
1041015138
5630.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTENNIAL LAKES
17868
1041017215
1552.6530
REPAIR PARTS
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
17869
1041030252
5620.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH PARK
17686 370736
17687 560050
17823 372688
17824 371657
17825 372677
17926. 372687
17927 372257
17928 372684
17929 372685
17930 372680
17931 372682
17744 138030
17870 501 -3003
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
5911.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
ENGINEERING GENERAL
PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
5/4/01 —5/10/01
Check # Date Amount Vendor Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Account Description
373.73
221140 5/10/01 104452 HALVORSEN, DODIE
6000 SWIMMING LESSON REFUND 17583 043001 1001.4390 REGISTRATION FEES
5/1010. 9:14:19
Page - 15
Business Unit
GENERAL FUND REVENUES
17637
21962
60.00
INSURANCE
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
221141
5/10/01
1550.6200
100795
HARRIS HOMEYER CO.
17639
684111
18,198.00
ADVERTISING PERSONNEL
WORKERS COMP INSURANCE
17640
683768
23,967.00
ADVERTISING PERSONNEL
GENERAL LIABILITY
42,165.00
221142
5/10101
102122
HEALTHCOMP EVALUATION SERVICES
342.00
DRUG TESTING
38.00
DRUG TESTING
380.00
221143
5/10101
101209
HEIMARK FOODS
214.80
PATTIES
214.80
221144
5/10/01
104462
HEMBREE, MARYANNE
79.00
TENNIS CAMP REFUND
79.00
221145
5110101
101215
HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFI
1,897.02
BOOKING FEES - MARCH
1,897.02
221146
5110101
100801
HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER
1,852.66
ROOM & BOARD - MARCH
1,852.66
221147
5/10/01
104357
HI -LAKE TRUE VALUE HARDWARE
74.30
BUILDING SUPPLIES
74.30
221148
5/10/01
102484
HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MANUFACTURI
428.13
PAINT
428.13
5/1010. 9:14:19
Page - 15
Business Unit
GENERAL FUND REVENUES
17637
21962
1550.6200
INSURANCE
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
17638
21961
1550.6200
INSURANCE
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
17639
684111
1550.6121
ADVERTISING PERSONNEL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
17640
683768
1550.6121
ADVERTISING PERSONNEL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
17745
015176
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
17871
050401
1001.4390
REGISTRATION FEES
GENERAL FUND REVENUES
17584 042401 1195.6170 COURT CHARGES LEGAL SERVICES
17585 003135 1195.6225 BOARD & ROOM PRISONER LEGAL SERVICES
17801 4/30 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE
STATEMENT
17802 53523 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER FIELD MAINTENANCE
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check # Date Amount Vendor Explanation
221149 5/10/01 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC.
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
514/01 - 5/10101
PO # Doc No Inv No
17688 257953
17689 257952
221150
5/10/01
1301.6406
104453
HOLMES, SUE
0217 - 460696
1301.6406
75.00
17875
TENNIS LESSON REFUND
1301.6556
TOOLS
75.00
0217- 460408
1301.6406
221151
5/10/01
0217- 460412
102410
HOOFNAGLE, LYLE
17878
0217 - 459852
184.88
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CRAFT SUPPLIES
0217 - 460045
1318.6406
184.88
221152
5/10/01
100417
HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY
157.52
PH PROBE PARTS
157.52
221153
5/10/01
100842
HOUSEHOLD BANK F.S.B. (KNOX)
20.83
CONCRETE
32.53
HOUSE NUMBERS, MAILBOX
158.14
CIRCULAR SAW
57.50
PICKET FENCE, SCREWS
57.50-
CREDIT MEMO
107.96
LUMBER, NAILS
180.17
LUMBER, SANDPAPER, BITS
499.63
221154
5/10/01
102942
HOWARD R GREEN COMPANY
1,332.49
TRAFFIC STUDY
1,332.49
221155
5/10/01
100811
HYDRO SUPPLY CO
-
266.17
-- -
RECEIVER ANTENNA
266.17
221156
5/10/01
101714
IDENTISYS INC.
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
221157 5/10/01 102664 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS
154.34 FAX MAINTENANCE
5/10/01 9:14:19
Page - 16
Account No Account Description Business Unit
5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING
5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
17586 043001 1001.4390 REGISTRATION FEES
18043 050101 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES
17872 1042611 5620.6530 REPAIR PARTS
17873
0217 - 460919
1301.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
17874
0217 - 460696
1301.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
17875
0217 - 460893
1301.6556
TOOLS
17876
0217- 460408
1301.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
17877
0217- 460412
1301.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
17878
0217 - 459852
1301.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
17879
0217 - 460045
1318.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL FUND REVENUES
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
EDINBOROUGH PARK
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
SNOW 8 ICE REMOVAL
17587 30597 1260.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEERING GENERAL
17880 0018719 -IN 5900.1357 INVENTORY WATER METER UTILITY BALANCE SHEET
17746 47496 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS POOL OPERATION
17803 23910287 1550.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENTCENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check # Date Amount Vendor Explanation
154.34
221158 5/10/01 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP.
143.78 UNION, NIPPLE, FLANGE
___57.25 BALL VALVE, ADAPTER
201.03
221159 5/10101 101761 IVERSON, KATHY
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
5/4/01 -5/10/01
PO # Doc No Inv No
17804 241461
17805 241464
5,000.00 CHEMICAL HEALTH CONSULTANT 17641 050101
795.89 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 17641 050101
Account No Account Description
1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS
1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS
5/10/01 9:14:19
Page - 17
Business Unit
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS
4201.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA CHEMICAL AWARENESS
221160 5/10/01 101861 J.H. LARSON COMPANY
1247726
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
17691
113.09
TIME DELAYS- BULBS - TAPPING TOOL
17747
4224271 -01
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
87.28
TIME DELAYS- BULBS - TAPPING TOOL
17747
4224271 -01
1322.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
28.17
FUSES
17748
4224261 -01
5932.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
49.55
SAW BLADE, FUSES
17749
4220609 -02
1552.6530
REPAIR PARTS
278.09
1250607
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
17829
221161 5/10/01 100830 JERRY S PRINTING
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
17830
1250608
POOL SEASON TICKETS
221162 5/10/01 102059 JOHNS, RICHARD
73.48 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
73.48
221164 5/10/01 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO.
2,074.28
260.40
9,163.21
989.20
289.64
289.64
1,489.66
.76
2,070.89
9.42-
2,034.31
99.01
528.90
17588 A -17987 5310.6575 PRINTING
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
GENERAL STORM SEWER
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
POOL ADMINISTRATION
17881 050301 5610.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ED ADMINISTRATION
17690
1247726
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
17691
1247729
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
17692
1247720
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
17693
1248682
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
17826
1249529
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
17827
1249530
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
17828
1250607
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
17829
1248681
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
17830
1250608
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
17831
156981
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
17932
1250602
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
17933
1250601
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
17934
1250605
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check # Date Amount
-
Vendor Explanation
--
2.205.93
102113 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY OF GOLDEN VAL
144.82
Council Check Register
816.98
STRAPS
23.80
Page - 18
702.58
GENERAL SUPPLIES
553.27
5/10/01
2,089.71
103230 JOHNSTONS SALES & SERVICE
212.59-
Account No
4,717.74
VACUUM BAGS
30,322.72
1250604
221165 5/10/01
103654 JOHNSON, DENISE
378.00
INSTRUCTOR AC
378.00
101414 KAR PRODUCTS
221166 5/10/01
100919 JOHNSON, NAOMI
5.15
REPAIR PARTS
183.45
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
8.88
17938
221167
5/10/01
5110.6513
102113 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY OF GOLDEN VAL
5110/01 9:14:19
Council Check Register
77.07
STRAPS
18046
Page - 18
77.07
GENERAL SUPPLIES
221168
5/10/01
5120.6406
103230 JOHNSTONS SALES & SERVICE
Inv No
Account No
84.99
VACUUM BAGS
17935
1250604
84.99
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
221169
5/10/01
1249528
101414 KAR PRODUCTS
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
58.73
REPAIR PARTS
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
58.73
17938
221170
5/10/01
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
101514 KASPRICK, JOHN
17939
1250599
8.22
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
17940
21.00
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
29.22
1250606
2211711
5/10/01
VERNON SELLING
102101 KINKO'S
CITY OF EDINA
050101
5110.6513
OFFICE SUPPLIES
5110/01 9:14:19
Council Check Register
5110.6564
CRAFT SUPPLIES
18046
Page - 18
5/4101 -5/10101
GENERAL SUPPLIES
18046
050101
5120.6406
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Account Description
Business Unit
17935
1250604
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
17936
1249528
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
17937
1250597
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
17938
1250600
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
17939
1250599
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
17940
1250598
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
17941
1250606
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
17942
155149
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
18044
1250603
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
18045 050101 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
18046
050101
5110.6513
OFFICE SUPPLIES
18046
050101
5110.6564
CRAFT SUPPLIES
18046
050101
5111.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
18046
050101
5120.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
18046
050101
5125.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
17750 184915 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
18047 811518
17589 467182
17590 050101
17590 050101
5420.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES
5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT
ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOI
MEDIA STUDIO
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
CLUB HOUSE
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
5860.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
5860.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
% ,
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check # Date Amount Vendor
958.50
958.50
221172 5/10/01 100944 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC.
1,423.00
1,393.11
27.95
699.00
3,543.06
221173 5/10/01 100844 KPMG LLP
400.00
250.00
500.00
1,500.00
2,000.00
4,650.00
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
5/4/01 -5/10/01
Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Account Description
NEWSLETTER PRINTING 17642 062200036775 2210.6575 PRINTING
5110/01 9.14.19
Page - 19
Business Unit
COMMUNICATIONS
17832
150426
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
17943
150519
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
17944
150520
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
17945
150427
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
17643
40571322
5110.6130
PROFESSIONAL SERV - AUDIT
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
17643
40571322
5210.6130
PROFESSIONAL SERV - AUDIT
GOLF DOME PROGRAM
17643
40571322
5310.6130
PROFESSIONAL SERV - AUDIT
POOL ADMINISTRATION
17643
40571322
5510.6130
PROFESSIONAL SERV - AUDIT
ARENA ADMINISTRATION
17643
40571322
3067.6130
PROFESSIONAL SERV - AUDIT
IBR #2 REVENUES
221174 5/10/01 100846 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO
1,526.60 17946 296873
____1_66.90 17947 296872
1,693.50
221175 5/10/01
104456 LAEGELER, OPAL L.
1400.6203
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
329.98
AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT
17655
050101
329.98
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
1400.6203
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
221176 5/10/01
100605 LANDS' END CORPORATE SALES
1400.6203
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
64.00-
UNIFORM CLOTHES
17644
01650618
52.00-
UNIFORM CLOTHES
17645
01654266
242.00-
UNIFORM CLOTHES
17646
01650543
138.00-
UNIFORM CLOTHES
17647
01625431
330.00-
UNIFORM CLOTHES
17648
01625499
158.00-
UNIFORM CLOTHES
17649
01625501
558.45
UNIFORM CLOTHES
17650
01586065
166.95
UNIFORM CLOTHES
17651
01586083
72.95
UNIFORM CLOTHES
17652
01627199
92.25
UNIFORM CLOTHES
17653
01670207
2,687.30
UNIFORM CLOTHES
17654
01659861
2,593.90
5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING
5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING
1001.4329 AMBULANCE FEES
1400.6203
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
1400.6203
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
1400.6203
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
1400.6203
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
1400.6203
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
1400.6203
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
1400.6203
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
1400.6203
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
1400.6203
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
1260.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1550.6121
ADVERTISING PERSONNEL
GENERAL FUND REVENUES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
ENGINEERING GENERAL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
R55CKREG LOG20000
101371 MACHOLDA, ED
CITY OF EDINA
90.00
240.00
221184 5/10/01
102237 MANGEN, DEB
55.17
Council Check Register
13.70
68.87
221185 5/10/01
100868 MARK VII SALES
5 /4/01 -5/10/01
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Account Description
221177
5/10/01
104358
LAUGHLIN'S PEST CONTROL
133.13
ANT CONTROL
17806
03 -88107
1646.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
133.13
221178
5/10/01
100852
LAWSON PRODUCTS INC.
458.90
SCREWS, WASHERS
17882
1514855
1325.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
154.45
WASHERS, NUTS, SCREWS
17883
1513052
1553.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
613.35
221179
5/10101
101552
LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES
34.73
DIRECTORY OF MN CITY OFFICIALS
17752
050201
1120.6405
BOOKS & PAMPHLETS
34.73
221180
5/10/01
100854
LEITNER COMPANY
1,242.12
INV 168489, 168494, 168513
17753
SOIL
5422.6543
SOD & BLACK DIRT
1,242.12
221181
5/10/01
103526
LOFFLER BUSINESS SYSTEMS
207.68
COPIER LEASE
17754
104971312
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
207.68
221182
5/10/01
100864
MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC.
578.32
DIRT SHOES, MANDREL
17756
2013822
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
1.926.59
STRIP BROOMS, GUTTER BROOMS
17757
2013848
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
221183 5/10/01
101371 MACHOLDA, ED
150.00
90.00
240.00
221184 5/10/01
102237 MANGEN, DEB
55.17
13.70
68.87
221185 5/10/01
100868 MARK VII SALES
PETTY CASH 17755 050201
CASH REGISTERS 17755 050201
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 18049 050401
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 18049 050401
5300.1030 PETTY CASH
5300.1040 CHANGE FUND
5/10/01 9:14:19
Page - 20
Business Unit
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
STREET NAME SIGNS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
ADMINISTRATION
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEI
AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEI
1180.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ELECTION
1120.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ADMINISTRATION
4,104.20 17695 272459 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
31.00 17696 272460 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING
71,15 17697 272437 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING
21.80 17698 272438 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor
Explanation
Council Check Register
17656
1,315.80
Page - 21
5/4/01 -5/10/01
894.20
PO # Doc No
Inv No
2,618.75
Account Description
Business Unit
17699
272436
32.70
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
17700
272186
39.80
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
17701
272187
1,541.45
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
17702
272189
10,670.85
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
221186
5/10101
5862.5515
100875 MCCAREN DESIGNS INC.
VERNON SELLING
17704
272435
1,213.45
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
PLANTS
30.28
1,213.45
PVC PARTS
17885
221187
5/10/01
104268 MCGARRY, JOANNE
26.50
TENNIS LESSON REFUND
5/10/01
26.50
MERIT SUPPLY
221188
5/10/01
100879 MEDICA CHOICE
513.43
CITY OF EDINA
312.66
5/10/01 9:14:19
Council Check Register
17656
050101
Page - 21
5/4/01 -5/10/01
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Account Description
Business Unit
17699
272436
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
17700
272186
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
17701
272187
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
17702
272189
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
17703
272188
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
17704
272435
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
17884 16236
17591 043001
5620.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH PARK
1001.4390 REGISTRATION FEES
1001.4329 AMBULANCE FEES
5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS
5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES
1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL FUND REVENUES
GENERAL FUND REVENUES
CENTENNIAL LAKES
EDINBOROUGH PARK
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
STREET NAME SIGNS
PATHS & HARD SURFACE
FIELD MAINTENANCE
FIELD MAINTENANCE
PATHS & HARD SURFACE
312.66
AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT -J HARDIN
17656
050101
312.66
221189
5/10/01
101483
MENARDS
412.85
WOOD & SUPPLIES
18050
48020
412.85
221190
5/10/01
101987
MENARDS
30.28
PVC PARTS
17885
3314
30.28
221191
5/10/01
100882
MERIT SUPPLY
513.43
RED PADS, CLEANING SUPPLIES
17758
56396
241.76
WYPALL, POLYLINERS
17759
56414
755.19
221192
5/10/01
101891
METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY
38.02
TENNIS NET CENTER STRAPS
17657
50689
170.35
BASES
17807
50926
106.39
HOME PLATES
17808
50902
596.19
TENNIS NETS
17809
50919
910.95
221193
5/10/01
104467
METRO LOCK & SAFE
5620.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH PARK
1001.4390 REGISTRATION FEES
1001.4329 AMBULANCE FEES
5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS
5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES
1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL FUND REVENUES
GENERAL FUND REVENUES
CENTENNIAL LAKES
EDINBOROUGH PARK
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
STREET NAME SIGNS
PATHS & HARD SURFACE
FIELD MAINTENANCE
FIELD MAINTENANCE
PATHS & HARD SURFACE
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
514101 -5/10/01
Check # Date Amount Vendor Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No
995.17 LOCK REPAIRS 18051 8154
Account No Account Description
5424.6530 REPAIR PARTS
17760 0000721776 5915.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS
17658 19771 1551.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES
5/10101 9:14:19
Page - 22
Business Unit
RANGE
WATER TREATMENT
CITY HALL GENERAL
17592
67081067
995.17
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
221194
5/10101
5421.5510
100887
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONME
17833
62706066
500.0_0
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
BACKWASH WATER PERMITS
18052
22444102
500.00
COST OF GOODS SOLD
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
221195
5/10/01
5421.5510
101161
MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPLY
602.47
SOAP, TOWELS, PLATES, TISSUE
602.47
221196
5/10/01
100692
MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLING COM
480.70
76.00
138.20
114.50
1,196.50
2,005.90
221197
5/10/01
101542
MILTONA TURF PRODUCTS
259.94
SOD STRIPPER W/BLADE
259.94
221198
5/10/01
100896
MINN COMM
38.15
QUARTERLY PAGER SERVICE
38.15
221199
5/10/01
100913
MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER &
750.00
SERVICE LINE REPAIR
1,875.00
SERVICE LINE REPAIR
2,100.00
WATER SERVICE REPAIR
1,200.00
WATER SERVICE REPAIR
975.00
WATER SERVICE CUT -OFF
6,900.00
221200
5/10/01
100903
MINNESOTA ELEVATOR INC
78.50
APRIL SERVICE
78.50
221201
5/10/01
101122
MINNESOTA MONTHLY PUBLICATIONS
166.66
MAGAZINE ADVERTISING
Account No Account Description
5424.6530 REPAIR PARTS
17760 0000721776 5915.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS
17658 19771 1551.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES
5/10101 9:14:19
Page - 22
Business Unit
RANGE
WATER TREATMENT
CITY HALL GENERAL
17592
67081067
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
17593
67081075
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
17833
62706066
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
18052
22444102
5430.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
18053
67085092
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
17890 177450 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES
17886 30343005010 5620.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENTEDINBOROUGH PARK
17594
31937
5913.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
17595
31938
5913.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
17761
31940
5913.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
17887
31942
5913.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
17888
31944
5913.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
DISTRIBUTION
DISTRIBUTION
DISTRIBUTION
DISTRIBUTION
DISTRIBUTION
17889
31259
5620.6230
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENTEDINBOROUGH PARK
17659
TC10071
5822.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check # Date Amount
Vendor Explanation
166.67
MAGAZINE ADVERTISING
1_66.67
MAGAZINE ADVERTISING
500.00
221202 5/10/01
103240 MINNESOTA SAFETY COUNCIL
271.00
DUES
271.00
5440.5511
221203 5/10/01
101753 MISSION SERVICE SUPPLY INC
173.17
AUDIO CASSETTE TAPES
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
5/4/01 -5/10/01
PO # Doc No Inv No
17659 TC10071
17659 TC10071
Account No Account Description
5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER
5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER
5/10/01 9:14:19
Page - 23
Business Unit
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
17660 021779 1120.6105 DUES 8 SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION
17596 102854 1100.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY COUNCIL
221204 5/10101
102820 MIZUNO USA INC
2,160.06
GOLF PUTTERS
18054
138677
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
123.95
GOLF WEDGES
18055
156048
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
124.21
GOLF WEDGES
18056
158557
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
646.00
GOLF IRONS
18057
162948
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
530.70
GOLF IRONS
18058
162949
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
595.73
GOLF IRONS
18059
158480
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
1,719.95
GOLF SHOES
18060
122467
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
25.43
HATS
18061
158676
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
230.25
GOLF CLUBS
18062
159576
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
811.75
GOLF CLUBS
18063
145650
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
18.71
CAPS
18064
157733
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
64.93
GOLF CLUBS
18065
145077
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
203.75
GOLF CLUBS
18066
153005
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
97.30
GOLF CLUBS
18067
156219
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
7,352.72
221205 5/10/01
100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC.
339.81
IRRIGATION PARTS
17597
61545-00
5422.6611
IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT
MAINT OF COURSE 8 GROUNDS
80.18
IRRIGATION PARTS
17891
62423 -00
5630.6530
REPAIR PARTS
CENTENNIAL LAKES
55.84
ELEMENT
17892
61056 -01
5630.6530
REPAIR PARTS
CENTENNIAL LAKES
475.83
221206 5/10/01
100921 NATIONAL CAMERA EXCHANGE
67.10
FILM
17661
0419107ODGG
2210.6408
PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
COMMUNICATIONS
67.10
221207 5/10/01
101598 NCRAAO
350.00
NCRAAO SEMINAR- KOOLE, BARTLETT
17662
050201
1190.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
ASSESSING
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
514/01 -5/10/01
Check # Date Amount Vendor Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No
350.00
221208 5 /10101 101710 NELSON, DAN
40.00 BASKETBALL PROGRAM CO -ORD. 18081 050401
5/10101 9:14:19
Page - 24
Account No Account Description
1629.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADAPTIVE RECREATION
40.00
221209 5/10/01
100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO.
435.00
17948
12657
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
435.00
221210 5110/01
101635 NEXUS INFORMATION SYSTEMS
8,568.08
WORKSTATIONS
18068
130175
1260.6803
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
ENGINEERING GENERAL
8,568.08
221211 5/10/01
104350 NIKE GOLF
238.31
GOLF BALLS
18070
38623099
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
2,128.77
SHOES
18071
38623098
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
3,635.82
SHOES
18072
38641927
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
75.33
GOLF BALLS
18073
38641928
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
769.32
GOLF BALLS
18074
38903525
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
522.90
GOLF BALLS
18075
38922561
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
345.85
GOLF BALLS
18076
38609458
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
771.48
SHIRTS
18077
38560835
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
28.08
SHIRT
18078
38560834
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
1,240.57
SHIRTS
18079
38560833
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
9,756.43
221212 5/10/01
103507 NIKE USA INC.
327.61
GOLF BALLS
18069
38426721
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
327.61
221213 5/10/01
100929 NORTH STAR ICE
113.02
17705
77112007
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
46.32
17949
77112005
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
159.34
221214 5/10/01
100925 NORTH STAR TURF
37.26
REPAIR PARTS
17598
249195
5422.6530
REPAIR PARTS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
171.93
FILTERS
17762
249268
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
65.89
WHEEL DECK, KNOB, SCREW
17763
249379
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
84.64
PAD RETAINING PINS
17764
249567
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check # Date Amount
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
5/4/01 -5/10/01
Vendor Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Account Description
AXLE SEAL 17765 249564 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS
REPAIR PARTS 17766 249704 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS
1,240.88
5/10/01 9:14:19
Page- 25
Business Unit
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
17599 19038600 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOI
17600 19047800 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOI
18080 19064400 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
17767 NW -70332 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
18082 050101 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
18083 042301 5610.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ED ADMINISTRATION
18083 042301 5610.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ED ADMINISTRATION
18083 042301 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES
17768
88707
541.17
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
17810
221215
5/10101
TOOLS
100933
NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY
73640403
5320.5510
16.92
POOL CONCESSIONS
18084
WHITE SABLE W/C
5110.6564
CRAFT SUPPLIES
124.35
CON PAPER, RAINBOW PADS
165.41
RICE PAPER, FLUID MATTE
306.68
221216
5/10/01
100930
NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO.
805.67
RECAPPED TIRES
805.67
221217
5/10/01
100729
ODLAND, DOROTHY
--
192.00
INSTRUCTOR AC
192.00
221218
5/10/01
101592
OFFICEMAX CREDIT PLAN
106.49
ACCT 6011584300016000
165.02
ACCT 6011584300016000
126.34
ACCT 6011584300016000
397.85
221219
5/10/01
100936
OLSEN COMPANIES
64.65
WIRE ROPE, CABLE CLIP
692.87
FLOORMAT, MODULE
757.52
221220
5/10/01
100939
OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC.
83.00
COOKIES
83.00
221221
5110/01
101500
PAPER DEPOT
367.55
CRAFT SUPPLIES
367.55
221222
5/10101
100941
PARK NICOLLET CLINIC
1.240.88
DRUG TESTING
1,240.88
5/10/01 9:14:19
Page- 25
Business Unit
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
17599 19038600 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOI
17600 19047800 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOI
18080 19064400 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
17767 NW -70332 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
18082 050101 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
18083 042301 5610.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ED ADMINISTRATION
18083 042301 5610.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ED ADMINISTRATION
18083 042301 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES
17768
88707
5422.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
17810
88022
1646.6556
TOOLS
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
17663
73640403
5320.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
POOL CONCESSIONS
18084
041301
5110.6564
CRAFT SUPPLIES
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
17601 04105 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
STATEMENT
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/10/01 9:14:19
Council Check Register Page - 26
5/4/01 -5/10/01
Check #
Date
Amount
REPAIR PARTS
Vendor
Explanation
221223
5/10/01
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
101718
PARTS PLUS
713093
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
1,957.21
17710
715717
REPAIR PARTS
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
1,957.21
3238002
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
221224
5/10/01
3238003
102047
PAUL KLITZKE R.P.T.
YORK SELLING
17713
3238001
85.00
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
PIANO TUNING
716570
5862.5512
85.00
VERNON SELLING
17950
716567
221225
5/10/01
YORK SELLING
104461
PELLA WINDOWS & DOORS
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
89.24
716569
5842.5513
REPLACE WINDOW /SCREEN
YORK SELLING
89.24
221226
5/10/01
100945
PEPSI -COLA COMPANY
184.32
184.32
221227
5110/01
100948
PERKINS LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS
852.00
RENTAL OF TRACK LOADER
852.00
221228
5/10/01
104454
PERKINS, SHARICE
200.00
APPLICATION FEE REFUND
200.00
221229
5/10/01
104457
PETERSON, RICHARD
75.00
GIFT CERTIFICATE REFUND
75.00
221230
5/10/01
100743
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
126.30
1,627.63
1,729.53
169.76
104.30 -
77.10-
50.45-
2,036.00
2,053.44
2,079.14
908.75
PO # Doc No Inv No
17893 042601
Account No Account Description
1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
18085 017397 5420.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENTCLUB HOUSE
17811
020039
1646.6530
REPAIR PARTS
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
17706
69383075
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
18086
PO 6232
5422.6251
SHARED MAINTENANCE
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
17602
042601
5601.4555
CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK
EB /CL REVENUES
17778 043001 5400.2071 DEFERRED REVENUE GOLF BALANCE SHEET
17707
714473
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
17708
714477
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
17709
713093
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
17710
715717
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
17711
3238002
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
17712
3238003
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
17713
3238001
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
17834
716570
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
17950
716567
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
17951
716568
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
17952
716569
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check # Date Amount Vendor Explanation
555.20
209.10
101.02
132.75
2,477.44
526.60
_ 53.61-
14,447.20
221231 5/10/01 104472 PINE COUNTY
CITY OF EDWA
GENERAL SUPPLIES
200.00
5822.5515
5/10/t,. 9:14:19
Council Check Register
18096
050701
50TH ST SELLING
Page - 27
5/4/01 -5/10/01
VERNON SELLING
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Account Description
Business Unit
17953
716564
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
17954
716566
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
17955
716563
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
17956
716565
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
17957
716571
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
17958
716572
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
17959
3237192
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET
5842.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
200.00
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT
18096
050701
50TH ST SELLING
5862.5515
200.00
VERNON SELLING
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
5842.5515
221232
5/10101
5842.5515
102156
PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
15.90
DUM DUMS
17714
41995
19.50
17960
42259
462.97
17961
42226
266.30
17962
42270
852.17
17963
42219
178.30
17964
42272
694.36
17965
42271
561.85
CIGARS
18087
42019
3,051.35
221233
5/10101
100959
POMMER COMPANY
285.58
PLAQUE ENGRAVING
17603
48359
285.58
221234
5/10/01
100961
POSTMASTER
_
68.00
BULK MAIL
18088
050101
68.00
221235
5/10/01
100961
POSTMASTER
980.00
BULK MAIL
18089
050501
980.00
221236
5/10/01
100961
POSTMASTER
5,000.00
PERMIT #939 UTILITY BILLING
18090
050701
5,000.00
221237
5/10/01
100961
POSTMASTER
1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET
5842.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
YORK SELLING
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
5110.6235 POSTAGE
5110.6235 POSTAGE
5910.6235 POSTAGE
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
GENERAL (BILLING)
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
514/01 - 5/10/01
PO # Doc No Inv No
17894 050401
Check #
Date
Amount
5862.5513
Vendor
Explanation
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
335.00
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
NEWSLETTER POSTAGE
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
335.00
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
221238
5/10/01
50TH ST SELLING
101032
PRINT SHOP, THE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
17720
485.86
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
NEWSLETTER
17721
953802 -00
485.86
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
17837
221239
5/10/01
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
100968
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
958102 -00
5860.4408
TRADE DISCOUNTS
555.45
17838
956040-00
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
868.80
958005 -00
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
17969
301.00
5840.4408
TRADE DISCOUNTS
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
813.97
417.00
571.32
120.70
3,648.24
221240
5/10/01
101877
PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE
COMPANY
542.10
BASIC LIFE 5-1 -01
52.20
GORDON HUGHES 5 -1 -01
13.65
COBRA 5-1 -01
607.95
221241
5/10/01
104455
PUPPE, RICHARD
19.00
UPGRADE LICENSE TO A
10.00
DRIVER IMPROVEMENT COURSE
29.00
221242
5/10/01
100971
QUALITY WINE
2,785.44
27.60-
319.17
3.14 -
39.00-
35.00-
60.00-
2,451.48
48.60 -
156.27-
1,971.03
19.51-
Account No Account Description
1628.6235 POSTAGE
17895 12820 1628.6575 PRINTING
17715 371648
17716 371650
17835 371658
17836 371656
17966 374161
17967 372681
17968 372683
17770 050201
17770 050201
17770 050201
17604 042701
17604 042701
5/10/01 9:14:19
Page - 28
Business Unit
SENIOR CITIZENS
SENIOR CITIZENS
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
1550.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
1550.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
1550.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
17717
958007 -00
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
17717
958007 -00
5860.4408
TRADE DISCOUNTS
VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
17718
957946-00
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
17718
957946-00
5860.4408
TRADE DISCOUNTS
VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
17719
953805-00
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
17720
954759-00
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
17721
953802 -00
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
17837
958102 -00
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
17837
958102 -00
5860.4408
TRADE DISCOUNTS
VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
17838
956040-00
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
17969
958005 -00
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
17969
958005 -00
5840.4408
TRADE DISCOUNTS
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
221243
CITY OF EDINA
1470.6186
104450
RAPID GRAPHICS & MAILING
5/10/0. 9:14:19
R55CKREG LOG20000
1,682.70
HEAT
CALENDARS, SUMMER SCHEDULES
17664
052401
1,682.70
Council Check Register
CITY HALL GENERAL
221244
5/10/01
Page - 29
100149
5/4/01 -5/10/01
17664
052401
88.57
HEAT
Check # Date Amount Vendor
Explanation PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Account Description
Business Unit
4,599.24
17970
958260-00
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
91.39-
17970
958260 -00
5840.4408
TRADE DISCOUNTS
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
668.03
17971
957950 -00
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
6.53-
17971
957950-00
5840.4408
TRADE DISCOUNTS
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
600.65
17972
957993 -00
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
5.95-
17972
957993 -00
5820.4408
TRADE DISCOUNTS
50TH STREET GENERAL
705.31
17973
958077 -00
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
14.00-
17973
958077 -00
5820.4408
TRADE DISCOUNTS
50TH STREET GENERAL
47.85-
17.974
955933-00
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
IIAa AA-
17975
955934 -00
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
221243
5/10/01
1470.6186
104450
RAPID GRAPHICS & MAILING
17664
052401
1,682.70
HEAT
CALENDARS, SUMMER SCHEDULES
17664
052401
1,682.70
HEAT
CITY HALL GENERAL
221244
5/10/01
1552.6186
100149
RED ROOSTER AUTO STORES
17664
052401
88.57
HEAT
REPAIR PARTS
17664
052401
88.57
HEAT
ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT
221245
5/10 101
5311.6186
104118
REGIS CORPORATION
17664
052401
11,726.00
HEAT
REIMBURSE 2000 OVERBILLING
17664
052401
11,726.00
HEAT
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
221246
5110101
5210.6186
100062
REINHARD, JEFF
17664
052401
137.81
HEAT
PADDLEBOAT REPAIR SUPPLIES
137.81
221247
5/10/01
100897
RELIANT ENERGY - MINNEGASCO
1,315.61
374.79
997.42
948.16
3,630.35
715.30
864.40
321.61
7,288.64
97.70
17605 6430 5610.6575 PRINTING
17771 B18105BRAEMA 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS
R
17896 050401 5901.4641 SEWER CHARGES
17606 043001 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
ED ADMINISTRATION
MAINT OF COURSE 8 GROUNDS
UTILITY REVENUES
CENTENNIAL LAKES
17664
052401
1470.6186
HEAT
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
17664
052401
1481.6186
HEAT
YORK FIRE STATION
17664
052401
1551.6186
HEAT
CITY HALL GENERAL
17664
052401
1552.6186
HEAT
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
17664
052401
1646.6186
HEAT
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
17664
052401
5111.6186
HEAT
ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT
17664
052401
5311.6186
HEAT
POOL OPERATION
17664
052401
5420.6186
HEAT
CLUB HOUSE
17664
052401
5422.6186
HEAT
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
17664
052401
5210.6186
HEAT
GOLF DOME PROGRAM
17664
052401
5430.6186
HEAT
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check # Date Amount
Vendor Explanation
8,593.12
100987
864.39
941.22
3,293.76
9.59
123.10
173.51
17607
30,552.67
1318.6517
221248 5/10101
100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY
88.00
REPAIR TOILET
88.00
221249 5/10/01
102408 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED
5.29
BALL HITCH
35.05
HITCH PIN, BALL HITCH
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
5/4/01 -5110101
PO # Doc No Inv No
17664 052401
17664 052401
17664 052401
17664 052401
17664 052401
17664 052401
17664 052401
17664 052401
17665 24727
Account No Account Description
5511.6186 HEAT
5620.6186 HEAT
5630.6186 HEAT
5911.6186 HEAT
5913.6186 HEAT
5821.6186 HEAT
5841.6186 HEAT
5861.6186 HEAT
1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS
17772 1366789 -01 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS
17773 1368436 -01 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS
5/10/01 9:14:19
Page - 30
Business Unit
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
EDINBOROUGH PARK
CENTENNIAL LAKES
PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER
DISTRIBUTION
50TH ST OCCUPANCY
YORK OCCUPANCY
VERNON OCCUPANCY
CITY HALL GENERAL
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
221250
5/10/01
100987
SA -AG INC
141.19
ICE CONTROL SAND
17607
14850
1318.6517
SAND GRAVEL & ROCK
SNOW & ICE REMOVAL
141.19
221251
5/10/01
100988
SAFETY KLEEN
210.26
HAZARDOUS WASTE REMOVAL
17608
0017194555
1280.6271
HAZ. WASTE DISPOSAL
SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD
79.92
OIL FILTER REMOVAL
17774
0017266164
5422.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
109.00
WASTE REMOVAL
17775
0017266163
5422.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
399.18
221252
5/10/01
101758
SANDERS WACKER BERGLY INC.
1,780.00
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL SERV.
17609
0056 -4
01322.1705.2000NSULTING DESIGN
BA -322 DREW AVE - W 66TH TO 6!
1,780.00
221253
5/10/01
104151
SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP.
390.00
ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE
17897
8100516737
4090.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
STREET REVOLVING
390.00
221254
5/10/01
102352
SECURITY LINK FROM AMERITECH
20.00
ALARM
17610
48456000
5111.6250
ALARM SERVICE
ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT
20.00
� Y
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
5/4101 -5/10/01
Check # Date Amount Vendor Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No
221255 5/10/01 100534 SHIRLEY, TOM
47,78 17776 050101
24,66 17776 050101
67.02 17776 050101
18091 55902
18091 55902
17611 043001
17898 3430
17722 118733
17723 118735
17839 412469
17976 118729
17977 118728
5/10/01 9:14:19
Page - 31
Account No
Account Description
139.46
5610.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
221256
5/10101
MEETING EXPENSE
100999
SIGNAL SYSTEMS INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTENNIAL LAKES
1,144.00
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
TIME CLOCK - EXEC COURSE
17812
3716949
1,1_45.75
REPAIR PARTS
TIME CLOCK - GRILL
2,289.75
221257
5110/01
101383
SIITARI, MICHAEL
237.4_8
MCPA CONFERENCE EXPENSES
237.48
221258
5/10/01
102431
SMITH & WESSON CAMERAS
135.00
LAW ENFORCEMENT CAMERAS
135.00
221259
5/10/01
101002
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS INC
5,231.15
106.85
133.00
60.45
1,502.35
7,033.80
221260
5/10/01
101023
SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CABLE COMMI
1,901.39
SECOND QUARTER
1,901.39
221261
5/10/01
101021
SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LLC
119.85
FUEL
'119.85
221262
5/10/01
101004
SPS COMPANIES
40.83
FLUX, INLET TRAP, SOLDER
7.92
GASKETS
272.77
BALL VALVE, RINGS
39.49
VALVES, ABRASIVE CLOTH
18091 55902
18091 55902
17611 043001
17898 3430
17722 118733
17723 118735
17839 412469
17976 118729
17977 118728
5/10/01 9:14:19
Page - 31
Account No
Account Description
Business Unit
5610.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ED ADMINISTRATION
5610.6106
MEETING EXPENSE
ED ADMINISTRATION
5630.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTENNIAL LAKES
5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE
5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL
1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
1400.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
17666 200136 2210.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER COMMUNICATIONS
17777 0419133038-4 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE
/26
17779
3711005
1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
17780
3708279
5900.1357
INVENTORY WATER METER
UTILITY BALANCE SHEET
17781
3708278
5932.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL STORM SEWER
17812
3716949
1646.6530
REPAIR PARTS
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check #
Date
Amount
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
Vendor
Explanation
221462.1
1400.6406
361.01
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
17900
050401
221263
5/10/01
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
103283
ST. CROIX RECREATION CO INC
1400.6408
PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
316.25
WALL HUNG CARRIER
316.25
221264
5/10/01
103277
ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT
CO INC
49.08
POINT
273.17
TOOTH
322.25
221265
5/10/01
101007
STAR TRIBUNE
2,187.36
WANT ADS
2,187.36
221266
5/10/01
101015
STREICHERS
117.10
HOLSTER
58.52
GOGGLES
175.62
221267
5/10/01
101765
STROH, STEVE
74.54
MEMORY READER
90.51
CAMERA CASE
165.05
221268
5/10/01
103756
STRUSS, AMANDA
100.00
SWIMMING INSTRUCTOR
100.00
221269
5/10/01
101018
SUBURBAN PROPANE
306.11
LP FUEL
306.11
221270
5110/01
102624
SUNDANCE DISTRIBUTION INC.
1,688.10
MULCH
1,688.10
221271
5/10101
101026
TARGET
37.07
CARDS/CAMERAS
37.07
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
5/4/01 -5/10101
PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Account Description
17813 12122 1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
17782 S198457 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS
17783 S198379 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS
17667 043001 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
5/10/01 9:14:19
Page - 32
PATHS & HARD SURFACE
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
17612
220406.1
1400.6203
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
17899
221462.1
1400.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
17900
050401
1400.6408
PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
17900
050401
1400.6408
PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
17814 050301
17613 041701
1629.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADAPTIVE RECREATION
5521.6581 GASOLINE
17901 S1.33704 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
17784 0743933 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
ARENA ICE MAINT
CENTENNIAL LAKES
CLUB HOUSE
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
5/4/01 -5/10/01
Check # Date Amount Vendor Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Account Description
221272 5/10/01 101028 TERRY ANN SALES CO
53425 WATER CUPS 18092 2348 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
5/1010 9:14:19
Page - 33
Business Unit
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
17724
224874
534.25
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
221273
5/10/01
224873
101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
50.20
225595
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
6,330.85
17979
225594
5862.5514
43.35
VERNON SELLING
18093
225277
2,708.35
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
GRILL
18094
354.00
5421.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
GRILL
182.00
225804
5421.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
303.80
9,972.55
221274
5/10101
102671 TRANE PARTS CENTER
319.63
MOTOR, FAN, SLINGER
319.63
221275
5/10/01
101045 TURF SUPPLY COMPANY
115.20
COURSE SUPPLIES
115.20
221276
5/10/01
103121 TURTLE BAY BUILDING SERVICE IN
985.13
MAY SERVICE
985.13
221277
5/10/01
104188 TWIN CITIES MACK & VOLVO TRUCK
7,58
SWITCH
7.58
221278
5/10/01
101047 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO
221,44
TRANSMITTER FOR OPENER
221.44
221279
5/10/01
102255 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO
17,08
TRANSFER HOSE REPAIR
17.08
221280
5/10/01
102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO.
487.77
SEED
487.77
5/1010 9:14:19
Page - 33
Business Unit
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
17724
224874
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
17725
224873
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
17978
225595
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
17979
225594
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
18093
225277
5421.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
GRILL
18094
193504
5421.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
GRILL
18095
225804
5421.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
GRILL
17785 185972 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
17614
080649
5420.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CLUB HOUSE
17902
787
5620.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
EDINBOROUGH PARK
17904 8489T 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS
17903 120611 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS
17786 596992
17787 3923
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
CENTENNIAL LAKES
1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
5422.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/10/01 9:14:19
Council Check Register Page - 34
5/4/01 —5/10/01
Check # Date Amount Vendor Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Account Description
221281 5/10/01 100363 U S BANCORP
190.64 RIT SIMULATOR (MENARDS) 17788 042601 1470.6579 TRAINING AIDS
190.64
221282 5/10/01 101049 UHL CO.
149.00 QUARTERLY SERVICE CONTRACT 17905 106623 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
— 149.00
221283 5/10/01 101051 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
1,662.48 UNIFORMS 17906 043001 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
606.61 UNIFORMS 17906 043001 1419.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
17907 34655 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
17615 368358 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES
17616 368349 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES
17815 369028 1645.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
17908 1003 - 1363529 5610.6188 TELEPHONE
3/20
17668 83153 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
RESERVE PROGRAM
EDINBOROUGH PARK
VERNON SELLING
YORK SELLING
LITTER REMOVAL
ED ADMINISTRATION
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
17617 0176373 -IN 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOI
17910 1112001 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET REVOLVING
2,269.09
221284
5/10/01
104466 UNITED MAINTENANCE PRODUCTS
100.02
BLADES, MOPS
100.02
221285
5/10/01
101058 VAN PAPER CO.
470.73
PAPER BAGS
867.44
PAPER BAGS
599.06
CAN LINERS
1,937.23
221286
5/10/01
102970 VERIZON WIRELESS BELLEVUE
34.46
34.46
221287
5/10/01
101067 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER
278.82
SAFETY SUPPLIES
278.82
221288
5/10101
103126 VIKING WOODCRAFTS INC
49.52
BRUSHES
49.52
221289
5/10/01
102886 WAGNER GREENHOUSES INC.
295.61
PLANTS, TOP SOIL
295.61
17907 34655 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
17615 368358 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES
17616 368349 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES
17815 369028 1645.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
17908 1003 - 1363529 5610.6188 TELEPHONE
3/20
17668 83153 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
RESERVE PROGRAM
EDINBOROUGH PARK
VERNON SELLING
YORK SELLING
LITTER REMOVAL
ED ADMINISTRATION
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
17617 0176373 -IN 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOI
17910 1112001 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET REVOLVING
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check #
Date
Amount
Vendor
Explanation
221290
5/10/01
5/10/01
102023 WAGNER, DOUGLAS
103966 WATER SPECIALTY OF MINNESOTA 1
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
217.24
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
MGIA CONFERENCE
AQUA VAC FILTERS
17912
217.24
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
221291
5/10/01
104458 WALKER, AMY
221295
5/10101
105.50
TENNIS LESSON REFUND
105.50
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE MEETING
17669
221292
5/10/01
101223 WALSER FORD
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
5/4/01 -5/10/01
PO # Doc No Inv No
17909 050401
17789 050201
5/10/0'. 9:14:19
Page - 35
Account No Account Description Business Unit
1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
1001.4390 REGISTRATION FEES
222.29 SHOES & LININGS 17618 92486FOW 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS
427.59 ANTI -LOCK BRAKE KIT 17911 92395FOW 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS
649.88
221293 5/10/01 103466 WASTE MANAGEMENT - SAVAGE MN
GENERAL FUND REVENUES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
2,693.52 REFUSE 17619 1168662 -2282 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH
-5
5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
2210.6106 MEETING EXPENSE
EDINBOROUGH PARK
COMMUNICATIONS
5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
2,693.52
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
221294
5/10/01
YORK SELLING
103966 WATER SPECIALTY OF MINNESOTA 1
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
187.75
--
AQUA VAC FILTERS
17912
403
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
187.75
221295
5/10101
101191 WILKINSON, JENNIFER
25.00
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE MEETING
17669
050101
25.00
221296
5/10/01
101033 WINE COMPANY, THE
591.30
17840
058948
286.60
17980
058949
677.90
221297
5/10101
101312 WINE MERCHANTS
158.50
17726
42156
75.25-
17841
12800
372.50
17981
41894
955.60
17982
42389
79.25
17983
42388
83.45
17984
42390
9.00-
17985
12683
1,565.05
5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES
2210.6106 MEETING EXPENSE
EDINBOROUGH PARK
COMMUNICATIONS
5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check # Date Amount Vendor Explanation
221298 5/10/01 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC
801.90
785.90
221299 5/10/01 101726 XCEL ENERGY
48.79
16.27
65.06
528,997.42 Grand Total
CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
514/01 —5/10/01
PO # Doc No Inv No
17842 105649
17843 105559
5/10/01 9:14:19
Page - 36
Account No Account Description Business Unit
5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
17620 0882 - 527 -880 5911.6185 LIGHT & POWER
-112
17621 1765 -647 -720 5422.6185 LIGHT & POWER
-113
Payment Instrument Totals
Check Total 528,997.42
Total Payments 528,997.42
PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
R55CKSUM LOG20000
Company
Amount
01000 GENERAL FUND
131,818.90
02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND
8,725.60
03066 IBR #2 FUND
2,000.00
04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND
10,168.07
04800 CONSTRUCTION FUND
1,780.00
05100 ART CENTER FUND
9,429.74
05200 GOLF DOME FUND
7,493.35
05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND
3,623.88
05400 GOLF COURSE FUND
69,919.91
05500 ICE ARENA FUND
82,381.05
05600 EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND
14,589.90
05800 LIQUOR FUND
148,909.85
05900 UTILITY FUND
37,149.06
05930 STORM SEWER FUND
1,008.11
Report Totals 528,997.42
CITY OF EUtivA 5/10/0. 9:21:40
Council Check Summary Page - 1
5/4/01 - 5/10/01
We confirm to the best of our knowledge
arid belief, that these claims
comply in all material respects
with the requirements of the City
of Edina purchasing p licles and
procedures to a ,�
Finance -bi etnr/
City M
/INA mil\
o�e�
U)
0
iBBB
REP ORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor Maetzold and members of
Agenda Item
the Edina City Counci .
From: John Keprios, Direct r
Consent
❑
Park & Recreation Dep rtment
Information Only
Date: May 4,'2001
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
®
To Council
❑
Subject: Edina Joint Powers Organization
Motion
❑
Board Meeting Minutes
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
INFO /BACKGROUND:
For your information, the Edina Joint Powers Organization has held four meetings to date
and I have attached a copy of their board meeting minutes for your review.
Their next Board meeting is scheduled for Monday, May 7, which is scheduled to
interview architect firm finalists. Further meetings will not be scheduled pending the
outcome of the referendum.
Edina Joint Powers Organization
7:30 A.M.
Edina Community Center, Room 348A
March 30, 2001
MEMBERS PRESENT: Mike Kelly, Linda Masica, Colleen Feige, Peyton Robb, Scott
Housh
STAFF PRESENT: John Keprios, Ed MacHolda, Susie Miller, Doug Johnson, Jay
Willemssen
OTHER PRESENT Jerry Gilligan, City Attorney
I. Review Duties of the Edina Joint Powers Ormanization (EJPO)
Jerry Gilligan, City Attorney, stated that the EJPO will consist of 8 Board Members
including: two governing school district voting members, Colleen Feige, Peyton Robb,
alternate Tim Walsh; two governing city voting members, Mike Kelly, Linda Masica,
alternate Scott Housh; two school district staff non - voting members, Doug Johnson,
Jay Willemssen; two city staff non- voting members, John Keprios, and Ed MacHolda.
Four of the voting members must be present at the meeting in order to have a quorum.
Staff does not vote. All EJPO meetings must be posted and are open for the public to
attend. EJPO must nominate a Chair to preside over the meetings, a Vice Chair to
preside over the meetings in the absence of the Chair, and a Secretary/Treasurer. The
alternate to the Chair does not preside over the meetings. The Secretary/Treasurer may
delegate the Secretary and Treasurer responsibilities to staff.
H. Appoint Chair, Vice Chair, and a Secretary/Treasurer
Linda Masica MOVED TO NOMINATE MIKE KELLY AS THE EPJO CHAIR,
PEYTON ROBB AS THE EPJO VICE CHAIR, AND LINDA MASICA AS THE
SECRETARY/TREASURER, Colleen Feige SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Linda Masica delegated the Treasurer responsibilities
to John Wallin, and the Secretary responsibilities to Janet Canton and Susie Miller.
Mr. Kelly recommended a Board Member list be compiled with names, email, phone
numbers, fax numbers, etc. Mr. Willemssen will compile this list and email it to
everyone.
1
111. Facility Use Agreement
The Board agreed by consensus to recommend four changes to the wording of the
Facility Use Agreement between the City and School District. It is recommended that
the City and School District attorneys agree to language that reflects these changes to
then be presented to the City Council and the School Board at their next meeting for
approval.
1. Amend Article 3.03 to include a charge for the use of Kuhlman Field when using
the field lighting. (Estimated charge of $10 - $15 per hour. Cost will be monitored
and fee will be adjusted each year.)
2. Amend Article I11. to describe the. intent to use outside funds to assist in covering
incrementally additional operating expenses. (Example, user fees and endowments
may be used to pay additional operating expenses.)
3. Amend Article 1.04 b. to add that the Principal of the school in which the
community would like to use during priority hours would need to give approval
prior to such consent given. (Consent may be withheld if affecting school events.)
4. Amend Article 1.04 e. to allow for community use of the competition swimming
pools prior to school hours, however, school district will have priority use during
those times.
IV. Review Construction Manager Application
John Keprios stated that he mailed Requests for Proposals to twelve (12) construction
management companies and received the following eight (8) applications in return.
1. Stahl'Construction
2. Krause Anderson
3. Adolphson & Peterson
4. CPMI
5. Bossardt Corp
6. E &V Construction
7. Mortenson MA Co.
8. AMCON Construction
It was noted that Mr. Keprios, Mr. Johnson, and Mr. Willemssen reviewed the
applications and developed a matrix chart emphasizing a variety of important factors
related to this project. The Board reviewed this chart and determined they can
eliminate some applicants based on the results. Mr. Kelly recommended that based on
the variation of fees charged by the applications, the Board should determine the fee
structure and have applicants determine if they can complete the project within the
realm of the structure the board determines. Peyton Robb MOVED TO AUTHORIZE
STAFF TO DETERMINE A FEE STRUCTURE TO DEFINE REIMBURSABLES
NOT TO EXCEED $800,000. Colleen Feige SECONDED THE MOTION.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Colleen Feige MOVED TO AMEND THE
2
MOTION TO INCLUDE A BONUS STRUCTURE BASED ON ACTUAL COSTS
BEING LESS THAN ESTIMATED COSTS. MOTION TO AMEND CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY.
V. Select Construction Manager Finalists for Interviews
Mr. Kelly recommended that the Board review the proposals at a different time and
based on the chart of information, he recommends that the Board eliminate any
applicant that does not have experience managing the construction of fields,
gymnasiums, or pools. The Board agreed to eliminate applicants 1, 3, and 8 based on
their lack of experience in at least one of the areas listed above. There was a motion to
remove Mortenson MA Company as a finalist, however, the motion was recanted. The
Board determined five finalists; Krause Anderson, CPMI, Bossardt Corp., E &V
Construction, and Mortenson MA Co. These finalists will be contacted and asked if
they still want to be considered given the required set fee structure. The EPJO Board
will interview finalists who are willing to complete the project within the
recommended fee structure.
Requirements of the applicants being interviewed:
• Specific project manager who would be in charge of this project must be at the
interview.
• Biography of the specific project manager must be received for the Board to
review prior to interview date.
• List of projects that the specific project manager has been involved with.
Recommended interview topics:
• Relevant Experience
• Team Approach
• Scheduled Timeline
• Fees
• Conflict of Interest (Construction Manager cannot also be a sub contractor or
architect)
Recommended interview questions:
• Tell us about the last time that you had a conflict with a customer?
• What is your philosophy on hiring engineer and architect agencies separately?
Email or fax ideas of other interview questions to Mr. Kelly, he will compile questions
and send back to the Board for review by Friday, April 6.
Interview Schedule
Monday, April 9, 2001
Edina Community Center, Room 349
12:30 - 1:00 P.M. Interview Preparation
P
1:00 - 1:30 P.M. First Interview
1:45 - 2:15 P.M. Second Interview
2:30 - 3:00 P.M. Third Interview
3:15 - 3:45 P.M. Fourth Interview
4:00 - 4:30 P.M. Fifth Interview
VI. Staff Assignments
Mr. Willemssen will contact applicants requesting the following information:
• Exact fee structure.
• Bio of the specific project manager.
• Three project references of the specific project manager.
• Notify applicant of their interview time after all details have been reviewed.
After determining fee structure with John Keprios, Mr. Willemssen will send fee
structure to Mr. Kelly for approval.
Mr. Keprios and his staff will contact the references of the finalists. He will also
notify the three applicants who did not make the final cut.
VII. Dates/Times for Future Meetings
All future meetings will be held at the Edina Community Center District Conference
Room:
Monday, April 9 (12:30 - 4:30 P.M.) - Construction Manager Interviews
Friday, April 13 (2:00 P.M. - 3:30 P.M.) - Determine Construction Manager
Tuesday, April 24 (7:30 - 9:00 A.M.) - EJPO Board Meeting
Monday, April 30 (7:30 - 9:00 A.M.) - EJPO Board Meeting
Monday, May 7 (7:30 - 9:00 A.M.) - EJPO Board Meeting
Monday, May 14 (7:30 - 9:00 A.M.) - EJPO Board Meeting
El
Edina Joint Powers Organization - Construction Manager Interviews
12:30 P.M.
Edina Community Center, Room 349
April 9, 2001
MEMBERS PRESENT: Mike Kelly, Linda Masica; Colleen Feige, Peyton Robb
STAFF PRESENT: John Keprios, Ed MacHolda, Susie Miller, Doug Johnson, Jay
Willemssen
I. March 30, 2001 Minutes
Colleen Feige recommended that alternate members should not be listed in the minutes as
absent. The March 30, 2001, minutes will be updated to reflect this request. Tim Walsh
was not absent from the March 30`h meeting.
II. Pre - interview Discussion and Preparation
Mike Kelly distributed the recommended questions for the construction manager
candidates.
III. Kraus Anderson Interview
Dick Lembke, Project Superintendent, would be on the job 100% of the time. Mr.
Lembke has experience with many similar projects. The largest project he managed
consisted of a $135,000,000 project which included 7 pools. Mr. Lembke stated "I have
never missed a deadline, Kraus Anderson knows how to run a project, we are #11 in the
nation, and #1 in Minnesota for school projects." John Huenink, Project Manager, would
be on site 90% of the time for the project. Mr. Huenink is an architect by trade.
To determine the cost estimates Mr. Huenink uses current and/or very similar jobs to
compare with price. Kraus Anderson likes to be very involved in the design phase, they
use the team approach and fix problems before they arise.
Most of their projects consist of multiple sites in many schools varying from 7 -13
different sites. If needed Kraus Anderson would provide additional project managers
and/or site supervisors at all of the additional sites. Mr. Lembke would be the first contact
for any of the sites. Kraus Anderson is "proactive not reactive." Mr. Huenink will
estimate the cost in the beginning and then continue monitoring the costs of the project.
Mr. Lembke stated that safety involves so many different area's. Safety includes safety of
the students, staff, and sub contractors. It also includes traffic control, air quality and
1
E
noise. Mr. Lembke looks at all of these area's and he works with the police to insure
minimal interruptions. "This is not baseball, they (sub contractors) do not get three
strikes."
IV. CPMI Interview
John Stelten, on -site Project Manager, would be on site 100% of the time. Mr. Stelten
was been with CPMI for 9 years and has a degree in Construction Management from the
University of Wisconsin - Stout. Mr. Stelten was the Construction Manager for Oglivie
Schools, the project was completed 9 years ago. Mr. Stelten would be the primary
contact and is in charge of -all of the sites regardless of location.
CPMI has more experience with projects in higher education. CPMI has set up a database
of their past projects, they use this database when estimating.the cost of the project. They
accept canvas bidder's and allow general contractors to bid entire jobs as one package. If
the bid is awarded to a general contractor, the role of CPMI changes to an advocating role
for the City and School District. CPMI uses the computer software program P3 for
scheduling sub contractors. This program detects and alerts potential problems in
scheduling. CPMI has handled some of the biggest projects in the state. "CPMI has
continuity, we work off each other's strengths ". CPMI has always had growth in their
company as well as they try harder from the get go. They have maintained a good
reputation.
V. Bossardt
Randy Nelson, Project Superintendent, manages the construction site. Mr. Nelson has
worked for Bossardt for 15 years and has a lot of experience with gymnasiums. Paul
Jackowski, Project Manager, would be involved with the pre - construction and the
construction stage.
Bossardt uses Value Engineering, they will determine the most cost effective way to meet
the goals of their projects. They set up a separate budget for each project. Bossardt value
manages every day. To estimate the project they use their own bid results. The project
manager will have daily communication with a staff member. During the pre - construction
phase there will be weekly communications.
VI. E &V
E &V has managed similar projects in Northfield, Wisconsin, Detroit, and Columbia
Heights. The only time they exceed the budget is when the owner changes the scope of
the project. "Estimating 'is one of our strong points." Each project will have a detailed
construction schedule along with a milestone schedule. The Construction Manager will
turn in a weekly report of the project. The construction Manager will also be involved in
team meetings, and council/ school board meetings. In handling security they would have
2
a staging plan in place and would meet with the staff and local fire department. Create
dust/smoke walls, set up a chain link fence in most areas and post signage.
VII. Mortenson
Mortenson completes projects on time and within budget. They have extensive
recreational and school experience. They also have current and relevant experience.
Disruption avoidance plans are set up. Confirmation of the budget will be compared with
similar projects. Mortenson has many more resources and are not intimidated by big
projects. For security purposes they would set up gates with restricted access,
communicate with local law enforcement, and segregate the construction area.
Communication with city and school would consist of weekly meetings and monthly
presentations.
VIII. Elimination of Candidates
Mike Kelly asked the committee if there was any company that could be eliminated.
CPMI was unanimously eliminated.
The committee ranked the remaining four companies 1 -4. Linda Masica, Mike Kelly, Ed
MacHolda, and Doug Johnson ranked Kraus Anderson #1 and E &V #2, Peyton Robb,
Colleen Feige, John Keprios, and Jay Willemssen ranked E &V #1 and Kraus Anderson
#2. Mortenson and Bossardt were eliminated. Mr. Kelly recommended the committee
review the reports and notes from the interview of Kraus Anderson and E &V.
IX. Adjournment
Mr. Kelly adjourned the meeting.
3
Edina Joint Powers Organization
2:00 P.M.
Edina Community Center, School District Conference Room
April 13, 2001
MEMBERS PRESENT: Mike Kelly, Linda Masica, Colleen Feige, Peyton Robb
STAFF PRESENT: John Keprios, Doug Johnson, Jay Willemssen, Susie Miller
I. Selection of Construction Manager
Kraus Anderson revised their calculation of the proposed construction management
compensation and removed a Project Manager from the site `B" location. This
eliminated $156,000 from the cost of the management services. Their total Construction
Management Compensation after revisions is $820,100. E &V's references (solicited and
unsolicited) resulted in mixed reviews. Compared to Kraus Anderson, E &V does not
have similar depth in management. After reviewing the information, Colleen Feige
MOVED TO SELECT KRAUS ANDERSON AS THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER
OF THE SCHOOL PROPERTY RELATED REFERENDUM PROJECTS. Linda
Masica SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
II. Contacting the Applicants
Jay Willemssen will contact Kraus Anderson and will discuss with them the process, look
at the materials, set up interviews and estimate the cost. Mr. Keprios will contact the
companies that were not selected as the construction manager. Mr. Willemssen will set up
contract work not to exceed the set amount of money. He will also set up the contract for
the Construction Manager and Architect.
III. Architect RFP
The RFP for the architects will soon be ready to go. The deadline to return their
application is April 25, 2001. Some of the questions to be added to the questionnaire
include; who would you partner with for engineering services? The committee agreed to
hire separate architects for the indoor work and the outdoor work. The architects and
engineers must have experience with pools and gymnasiums. The competition pool is
very complicated. Some of the larger architecture firms have their own engineering
firms. Architects can submit an application for both the indoor and the outdoor projects.
An experienced architect for the fields is important for designing a quality and durable
outdoor athletic field with proper drainage. Mr. Keprios, Mr. Johnson, and Mr.
Willemssen will prepare the architect/ engineer matrix for the April 30, 2001 meeting.
1
IV. Miscellaneous
The school district's football program may need to be relocated for the 2002 football
season and the track team will definitely need to move the spring of 2002.
There is a concern that there may only be one bleacher company in the midwest. There
was only one bid for the bleachers at Valley View and South View schools.
V. Meeting Schedule
It was decided that there would be no need to meet on Tuesday, April 24, because the
RFP's from the architects are not due until Wednesday, April 25h.
The next two JPO Board meetings are scheduled for:
• Monday, April 30t', 7:30 a.m. - 9:00 a.m. - EJPO Board Meeting (Review RFP's)
• Monday, May 7`", 7:30 a.m. - 12:30 p.m. - EJPO Board Meeting (Interview
architects)
VI. Adjournment
Mr. Kelly Adjourned the meeting.
2
Edina Joint Powers Organization
7:30 A.M.
Edina Community Center, School District Conference Room
April 30, 2001
MEMBERS PRESENT: Mike Kelly, Linda Masica, Colleen Feige, Peyton Robb
STAFF PRESENT: John Keprios, Doug Johnson, Jay Willemssen, Susie Miller
OTHERS PRESENT: Gary Benson, Krause Anderson Vice President
I. Approval of Monday, April 9, 2001 and Friday, April 13, 2001 Minutes
Colleen Feige MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES FROM THE MONDAY,
APRIL 9, 2001 AND FRIDAY APRIL 13, 2001 MEETINGS. Linda Masica
SECONDED THE MOTION. Discussion: Peyton Robb reported that the discussion
about the change in the facility use agreement was not noted in the minutes, this
discussion was documented in the March 30, 2001 minutes. MOTION CARRIED
UNANIMOUSLY.
H. Review Indoor and Outdoor Architect Applications
Indoor Applicants
John Keprios, Doug Johnson, Jay Willemssen and Gary Benson reviewed all of the
applications and rated each firm in a variety of areas. See attached chart. Mr. Keprios
reviewed the results with the JPO members. Staff recommended narrowing down the list
to 5 firms based on the report's findings. Mr. Benson reviewed the remaining 5
applications and rated the firms in a number of areas. Mr. Benson then determined a
score for each firm. Rozeboom - Miller, which is a spin off of HGA firm, received the
highest rating of 22, ATS & R - 18, Wold Architects - 16.5, KKE - 14.5, TSP - 14. KKE
scored high in many areas, however their fee is $500,000 higher than the other five
finalists. The JPO Board directed Mr. Keprios to contact KKE to inform them they will
be interviewed for the project only if they can reduce their fee $500,000.
Outdoor Applicants
Mr. Keprios, Mr. Johnson, Mr. Willemssen and Mr. Benson also reviewed and rated the
outdoor architecture applications. Anderson Johnson Associates and ATS & R did not
receive any red marks in the evaluation process.
1
III. Select Architects for Interview Process
If KKE does reduce their fee, the committee will be interviewing 5 candidates for the
indoor projects on Monday, May 7h. The interviews will begin at 8:00 a.m. and be
scheduled in 20- minute increments. The following are the finalists for the indoor projects.
1. KKE
2.
TSP ONE, Inc.
3.
Wold Architects
4.
Rozeboom- Miller
5.
ATS &R
The following are finalists for the outdoor projects, interviews will be held on Monday,
May 7t'.
1. Anderson Johnson Associates
2. ATS &R
ATS & R will be interviewed last to allow for additional time to cover both the outdoor
and the indoor applications. Ms. Feige stated she felt there may be some benefits of
having one architect to cover both the outdoor and the indoor projects.
Reference checks will be completed prior to the interviews.
IV. Meeting Schedule
At this point, Mr. Kelly has determined that we do not need to set up any further meetings
pending the outcome of the referendum. After the interviews on Monday, May 7t' this
decision will be reviewed.
V. Adiournment
Mike Kelly adjourned the meeting.
E
BLOOMINGTON • [DEN PRAIRIE • [DINA • MAPL[ GROVE • MINNETONKA • PLYMOUTH • RICHFIELD
1494 CORRIDOR COMMISSION
8080 Mit W Road • Eden Prairie MN 55344 • (614 )699 -4428 • FAX 6904094
May 7, 2001
Senator Dave Johnson
Senate District 40
Room 124 Capitol Building
St. Paul, Minnesota 55155
Dear Senator Johnson:
On behalf of the I -494 Corridor Commission and its member cities of Bloomington, Eden Prairie, Edina, Maple
Grove, Minnetonka, Plymouth and Richfield, I would like to express the Commission's deep appreciation for your
efforts during the 2001 session to improve 1 -494 and increase Minnesota transportation system funding.
"'though the 2001 session is not yet over, we believe that your leadership to accelerate I -494 reconstruction from the
.mesota River to Highway 394 has brought the need for critical increases in transportation funding to the attention
of the general public and the media. This discussion has occurred in many different forms throughout the past several
years, but your bipartisan efforts this year to improve I -494 while also accelerating other "megaprojects" in the
metropolitan area is both good public policy and the beginning of a solution to our growing transportation funding
crisis. Our cities applaud your efforts, and will continue to work with you and our other legislative leaders to pass
legislation that will stop the decay of our highway infrastructure and keep transit buses running in our communities.
Again, our sincere appreciation for the extraordinary amount of time and work you have committed to transportation
needs this session. Please let me know if there is anything the I -494 Corridor Commission can do to assist your
efforts as we forge ahead to keep Minnesota moving.
Sincerely,
ames B. H land
Chair
I -494 Corridor Commission
cc: Member cities of the I -494 Corridor Commission
BLOOMINGTON • [DEN PRAIRIE • [DINA a MAPLE GROVE • MINNETONKA • PLYMOUTH • RICHFIELD
L
1494 CORRIDOR COMMISSION
8080 Mitchell Road • Eden Prairie MN 55344 • (612 )699 -4428 • FAX 690 -4094
May 7, 2001
Senator Roy Terwilliger
Senate District 42
115 State Office Building
St. Paul, Minnesota 55155
Dear Senator Terwilliger:
On behalf of the I -494 Corridor Commission and its member cities of Bloomington, Eden Prairie, Edina, Maple
Grove, Minnetonka, Plymouth and Richfield, I would like to express the Commission's deep appreciation for your
efforts during the 2001 session to improve I -494 and increase Minnesota's transportation system funding.
'though the 2001 session is not yet over, we believe that your leadership to accelerate I -494 reconstruction from the
anesota River to Highway 394 has brought the need for critical increases in transportation funding to the attention
of the general public and the media. This discussion has occurred in many different forms throughout the past several
years, but your bipartisan efforts this year to improve I -494 while also accelerating other "megaprojects" in the
metropolitan area is both good public policy and the beginning of a solution to our growing transportation funding
crisis. Our cities applaud your efforts, and will continue to work with you and our other legislative leaders to pass
legislation that will stop the decay of our highway infrastructure and keep transit buses running in our communities.
Again, our sincere appreciation for the extraordinary amount of time and work you have committed to transportation
needs this session. Please let me know if there is anything the I -494 Corridor Commission can do to assist your
efforts as we forge ahead to keep Minnesota moving.
Sincerely,
es . Ho and
Chair
I -494 Corridor Commission
cc: Member cities of the I -494 Corridor Commission
.-DAN PATCH CORRIDOR
Commuter Rail Feasibility Study
Tech- u-1cal, Rewport.
Noise and Vibration Impacts of
Commuter Rail Operations
March 9, 2001
Submitted to:
Dakota County Regional Railroad Authority
Submitted by:
PARSONS
BRINCKERHOFF
YCAM 0
I ( BIKO ASSOCIATES
I N C 0 R P 0 R A T E D
NOISE AND VIBRATION IMPACTS OF COMMUTER RAIL OPERATIONS
Background and General Conclusions
A literature review was conducted to learn about noise and vibration impacts of commuter rail operations
in the United States. The review made it clear that noise and vibration impacts are directly related to the
following factors.
• Speed and volume of rail transit trains;
• Design and condition of commuter rail vehicles;
• Distance between noise and vibration sensitive receivers and the trackbed;
• Commuter train wheels and condition of the track, engine idling, and operation of the warning
whistle or horn;
• Mitigation effects of noise barriers; and
• Classification of soils or other covering materials as either hard or soft cover.
The general conclusion from the literature review is that commuter rail operations can generate noise
and ground -borne vibrations. The literature indicates, however, that Federal Railroad Administration
(FRA), the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), and the State of Minnesota have developed noise
standards that are designed to regulate noise levels and noise exposure. Exceedances of the noise
standards will require mitigation to protect sensitive noise receivers from excessive noise.
Speed and Volume of Commuter Rail Trains
Speed.
Freight trains operating within the Dan Patch corridor (Northfield to Minneapolis) currently operate at
speeds that range between 10 and 25 miles per hour. By comparison, the most recent service planning
analysis places the estimated average speed for the Dan Patch line commuter trains at 35 miles per hour.
This average speed is not indicative of high speed commuter rail operations, though speeds vary by
segment and are estimated to reach an average of 58 miles per hour in the longest segment, between
Lakeville and Northfield.
Average speed is dependent on a number of factors, which are listed below:
• Line haul speed between stations, which is dependent on alignment and track characteristics
(including alignment curvature and presence or not of siding tracks to allow faster trains to pass
slower ones)
• Number of stations where trains stop and dwell time at stations
• Grade crossing restrictions
Volume:
Depending on the segment of track within the corridor, the volume of freight train traffic ranged between
0 and 12 trains per day in 1993. Field observations indicated that the length of the trains can vary from
over one mile to as little as a single locomotive three or four cars. Based on information provided by the
railroads, the current frequency of freight trains ranges between:
• 3 to 4 between Northfield and Lakeville (CP Rail)
• 3 to 4 between St. Louis Park Junction and Milwaukee Junction (CP Rail)
• 3 to 4 between Milwaukee Junction and Port Cargill (CP Rail)
• 37 between Minneapolis Junction and Lyndale Junction (BNSF)
• 6 between St. Louis Park Junction and Lyndale Junction (BNSF)
Technical Report
Noise and Vibration Impacts of Commuter Rail Operations
Page l
The volume of commuter rail trains is currently planned to be 12 trains per day (six inbound and six
outbound, one of which will operate in the reverse commute direction). The commuter trains would
consist of a locomotive and five cars. They would operate during peak travel times, usually the hours of 6
to 9 AM and 3 to 6 PM.
Design and Condition of Commuter Rail Vehicles
Although the volume of trains operating in the corridor will increase with the addition of commuter rail,
the impacts of commuter rail trains, compared to those of current freight trains, are fewer and less
noticeable. Some of the distinguishing characteristics and impact differences are outlined below:
Commuter Rail Trains
Freight Trains
Impact Difference
Commuter rail trains consist of a locomotive
Freight trains operating in the
Commuter rail trains have less impact at
and three to five passenger cars,
corridor, typically averaging 30
grade crossings and shorter exposure times
approximately 200 to 300 feet long.
cars in length, have. also been
to stationary features such as residences.
observed to be up to a mile (5,280
feet) long.
Commuter rail trains are lighter. Passenger
Freight trains are heavier than
Less noise from the wheel to track interface
cars are constructed to provide riders a
commuter rail trains. Freight cars
with commuter rail trains.
smooth ride, and there are fewer passenger
are constructed to carry heavy
cars than there are freight cars.
loads.
Commuter rail locomotives can be built to
Freight locomotives emit
Commuter rail locomotives can be
emit less exhaust. Electric locomotives emit
comparatively more exhaust.
equipped to be quieter than freight
90 dBA, and diesel/electric locomotives,
locomotives.
which emit 92 dBA.
Commuter rail trains are faster than freight
Freight trains are comparatively
Commuter rail trains are exposed to
trains.
slower.
stationary features for a shorter period of
time.
In the interest of passenger comfort,
Cost efficient freight operations
Commuter rail vehicles are maintained to
commuter rail vehicles are regularly
are not concerned with comfort.
provide high levels of comfort and to
inspected and maintained.
Consequently, inspections and
minimize impacts to adjacent land uses.
maintenance activities . are
conducted on a need basis.
Distance from Structures and Residences
The State of Minnesota has established minimum horizontal clearance for railroad operations. The state
specifications require a minimum clearance of 8 feet between the outside edge of the track and the nearest
structure. At this point in the feasibility study, it is assumed that this minimum clearance is met and that
all structures and residences are appropriately separated from existing railroad track.
Field review for the Dan Patch Commuter Rail Feasibility Study indicates that no residences are out of
compliance with state specifications, although two residences in Edina are accessed solely by a driveway
that cuts across the tracks. It is highly likely that these residences will be acquired if commuter rail is
developed.
The current direction taken for planning commuter rail service in the corridor is to use existing right -of-
way, replacing existing track where necessary. Therefore, planning to -date assumes that the commuter
Technical Report
Noise and Vibration Impacts of Commuter Rail Operations
Page 2
rail alignment would adhere to state specifications. For particular and isolated segments of the alignment,
passing sidings or additional track will need to be constructed. Wherever this is the case, State of
Minnesota specifications would apply, and structures and residences that are beyond the minimum
clearance would be acquired.
Commuter Rail Train Noise
Noise impacts from trains primarily result from: 1) the wheel to track interface; 2) idling, and 3) the horn
(warning whistle). By far, the horn has the greatest impact. Because of the characteristics of commuter
rail trains, compared to those of freight trains, these impacts are not as severe with commuter rail
operations. These three sources are discussed below.
Wheel to Track Interface:
Wheel to track noise comes from two sources
between two adjoining rails. By comparison,
wheels on freight cars. This extra mainten
passengers.
: 1) wheels going flat and 2) wheels running over the gap
wheels on passenger cars are "trued" more frequently than
nce effort is performed to ensure a comfortable ride for
To ensure a comfortable ride for passengers, adjoining rails on commuter rail alignments are welded to
eliminate the gaps. Resilient rail fasteners, resilient rail ties, ballast mats, and floating slabs are mitigation
measures that can control ground -borne noise and vibration.
Idling:
Locomotives are very noisy when they idle. Idling can be eliminated by constructing passing sidings or
double tracks, which allow faster trains to overtake slower trains or trains approaching each other to
continue without requiring one of them to pull over to side and idle while the other goes by.
Horn (Warning Whistle):
As directed by law, the FRA issued a proposed rule on January 13, 2000 that stipulates situations under
which train whistles do not have to be sounded at highway /rail grade crossings. The rule states that
whistles must be used at every crossing unless one of three conditions or exceptions are met: a) the train
operates at no more than 15 miles per hour and the crossing is "flagged" properly; b) the train operated at
15 miles per hour along a city street, with proper signage; or c) when designated "quiet zones" are
established with "supplementary" or "alternative" safety measures incorporated at a crossing. Further
analysis will be conducted during the feasibility study to determine if there are grade crossings where that
fall into any of these three categories.
The referenced "supplementary" safety measures (e.g., four - quadrant gates and median barriers) may cost
in the range of $250,000 to $300,000 per crossing.
FRA standards specify that the whistle must be at minimum 96 dBA, 100 feet in front of the train, while
the train is in a stationary position. Studies have shown that because the whistle on locomotives is located
behind the smokestack, it must be blown at 105 dBA or more at its source to meet the specifications.
This is because the smokestack effectively blocks the forward movement of sound from the whistle and
additionally disperses sound laterally.
Whistles on commuter locomotives have been retrofitted to the front of the locomotive and housed within
a three foot -long box to address this problem. Results have shown that the whistle can be blown at a
Technical Report
Noise and Vibration Impacts of Commuter Rail Operations
Page 3
lower decibel level (101 dBA to 102 dBA) at its source and still meet FRA specifications and lateral
dispersion is significantly reduced.
Mitigating Commuter Rail Noise and Noise Standards
The purpose of noise barriers for trains is the same as the purpose of noise barriers that are constructed
along highways. Preventing wheel and brake noise from reaching sensitive receivers such as residential,
school, and park land uses requires that the barriers are constructed at the edge of shoulder or at the
property line of the affected sensitive receptor. The use and location of wayside noise barriers would
need to be feasible and reasonable to be considered as an appropriate mitigation. Mitigation is. feasible if
the barrier provides 5 dBA or more in noise reduction to the affected receptor, and if the cost per shielded
dwelling unit is considered reasonable.
The wayside noise barriers for rail operations are typically 4 feet to 6 feet high and are located at the edge
of shoulder or at the property line of the affected receptor. Wayside noise barriers have been proven to
provide a 5 dBA to 10 dBA noise reduction, depending on the height of affected receptor. Mn/DOT does V
not currently endorse the use of noise barriers on commuter lines. However, where necessary, the Dan
Patch Commuter Rail Feasibility Study will present them as a mitigation option.
Barriers a indicated where land use - specific noise standards are exceeded he following table presents
State of 1VLnnesota noise standards
Noise Area
Classification
General Land
Use Type
Sound Level (dBA)
Da (7 AM to 10 PM)
Night (10 PM to 7 AM)
L50
L10
L50
L10
1
Residential
60
65
50
55
2
Commercial
65
70
65
70
3
Industrial
75
80
75
1 80
Source: Minnesota Rules Parts 7010.0010 to 7010.008
1
Technical Report
Noise and Vibration Impacts of Commuter Rail Operations
Page 4
121
L S0
In addition to meeting State of Minnesota standards, the commuter rail trains must meet Federal
regulations, which state that sound levels produced by rail cars moving faster than 45 miles per hour,
must not exceed 3 d at a istance o 100 feet fro the centerline of the track. (49 CFR Part 210.)
Additionally, the Federal Transit Administration (F IA) A) has developed criteria for assessing noise impacts
related to commuter trains. The standards provided in the Transit Noise and Vibration Assessment (FTA,
1995), are founded on documented research on community reaction to noise and are based on change in
noise exposure using a sliding scale. According to the scale, the increase in noise level that a transit
project is allowed to change the overall environment is reduced with increasing levels of existing noise.
The FTA Noise Impact Criteria groups noise - sensitive land uses into the following three categories:
CategMl: Buildings or parks where quiet is an essential element of the intended purpose.
Category 2: Residences and buildings where people normally sleep and where nighttime sensitivity is
assumed to be of utmost importance.
Category 3: Institutional land uses with primary daytime and evening use.
Two levels of impact included in the FTA criteria are summarized below:
Severe: Severe noise impacts are considered "significant" as this term is used in the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and implementing regulations. Noise mitigation will
normally be specified for severe impact areas unless there is no practical method for
mitigating the noise.
Moderate
Impact: In this range, other project- specific factors must be considered to determine the
magnitude of the impact and the need for mitigation. These other factors include
predicted increase over existing noise levels, the types and number of noise - sensitive land
uses affected, existing outdoor /indoor sound insulation, and the cost effectiveness of
mitigating noise to more acceptable levels.
The following table describing allowable, cumulative noise level increases was prepared and issued by
FTA, based on these definitions. The first column in the table shows the existing noise levels, and the
remaining columns show the commuter rail- related increase in noise levels that would result in either a
moderate impact or a severe -impact. Thus, if under Category 1 and 2 land uses, the existing noise level is
45 dBA, commuter rail operations would be able to add 7 dBA without triggering a moderate impact. If 8
dBA were added, a moderate impact condition would exist, and if 14 dBA were added by commuter rail
operations a severe impact condition would exist.
The table shows that as existing noise levels increase; the amount of the allowable increase in the overall
noise levels caused by .the rail transit project decreases.
Technical Report
Noise and Vibration Impacts of Commuter Rail Operations
Page 5
AT.i.OWARi.F_ CUMULATIVE NOISE -LEVEL INCREASES
Existing Noise
Exposure (dBA)
Category 1 and 2 Land Uses (dBA)
Category 3 Land Uses (dBA)
Moderate Impact
Severe
Moderate Impact
Severe
45
8.0
14.0
12.0
19.0
46
7.0
13.0
12.0
18.0
47
7.0
12.0
11.0
17.0
48
6.0
12.0
10.0
16.0
49
6.0
11.0
10.0
16.0
50
5.0
10.0
9.0
15.0
51
5.0
10.0
8.0
14.0
52
4.0
9.0
8.0
14.0
53
4.0
8.0
7.0
13.0
54
3.0
8.0
7.0
12.0
55
3.0
7.0
6.0
12.0
56
3.0
7.0
6.0
11.0
57
3.0
6.0
6.0
10.0
58
2.0
6.0
5.0
10.0
59
2.0
5.0
5.0
9.0
60
2.0
5.0
5.0
9.0
61
1.9
5.0
4.0
9.0
62
1.7
4.0
4.0
8.0
63
1.6
4.0
4.0
8.0
64
1.5
4.0
4.0
8.0
65
1.4
4.0
3.0
7.0
66
1.3
4.0
3.0
7.0
67
1.2
3.0
3.0
7.0
68
1.1
3.0
3.0
6.0
69
1.1
3.0
3.0
6.0
70
1.0
3.0
3.0
6.0
71
1.0
3.0
3.0
6.0
72
0.8
3.0
2.0
6.0
73
0.6
2.0
1.8
5.0
74
0.5
2.0
1.5
5.0
75
1 1.2
5.0
Technical Report
Noise and Vibration Impacts of Commuter Rail Operations
Page 6
An extensive study conducted in Encinita, California (Noise Assessment of North County Transit District
Passing Track, Mestre Greve Associates; February 3, 1997), included noise monitoring of commuter rail
trains along line haul track segments and while idling. The study was conducted to identify noise impact
reductions that would occur with construction of passing sidings. The study documented the following
commuter rail noise levels at three locations. The results indicate how commuter rail train noise can be
dissipated to acceptable levels over distances.'
Location
Noise Level Contour Distances (Feet) Between Track and Sensitive
Receiver
60 dBA
65 dBA
70 dBA
1
198'
92'
43'
2
81'
38'
17'
3
198'
92'
43'
Source: Noise Assessment of North County Transit District Passing Track, Mestre Greve Associates;
February 3, 1997.
Ground -Borne Vibrations
A study conducted for Southern California Regional Rail Authority Metrolink (Sound Level and Seismic
Level Survey; February 1996) included seismic monitoring activities to measure ground -borne vibrations
from 24 commuter rail trains. Monitoring was conducted at 40 feet and 20 feet from the centerline of
track. Results showed that at 40 feet, ground -borne vibrations were below the threshold of human
perception, and at 20 feet vibrations were in the range of 40 to 60 cycles per second, which is just above
the perception threshold.
It was stated in the study that, "These ground vibrations [at 20 feet] could be sensed by a person, but are
of such a low level and high frequency, that they would not have an effect on a low rise structure. A low
rise structure, such as a house, has a whole structure motion frequency in the range of one to 10 cycles per
second. In this range of frequencies, the highest vibration measured was 0.00001 meters per second. The
threshold for structural damage (.02 meters per second) is 2,000 times higher than the measured vibration.
Throughout the measured frequency range, the highest vibration level noted at 40 feet was 0.00031
meters per second, which is less than the threshold for human perception."
It should be mentioned that the leading research on ground -borne vibrations has been conducted in
California, where geological conditions (soil structure and ground response characteristics) are different
from those in Minnesota. In California, soils are typically classified as had ground covers that would
serve to propagate vibrations further and faster than. comparatively softer ground covers that one would
These results are good indicators, but are not directly transferrable to the Dan Patch Corridor.
Variables that could affect noise monitoring outcomes are: track and rail bed characteristics,
length of commuter rail trains, design of locomotive and passenger cars, terrain and ground cover,
soil type, ambient temperature, and background noise from other sources such as automobile
traffic.
Technical Report
Noise and Vibration Impacts of Commuter Rail Operations
Page 7
find in Minnesota. Ground -borne vibrations have been successfully mitigated by improving the trackbed
with resilient rail fasteners, resilient rail ties, ballast mats, and floating slabs.
Technical Report
Noise and Vibration Impacts of Commuter Rail Operations
Page 8
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Behrens and Associates, Inc. "Covina Metrolink Commuter Rail Noise and Vibration Study. " Technical
report prepared for the City of Covina, California (March 1996).
Code of Federal Regulations, 40 CFR, Environmental Protection Agency, Part 201 - Noise Emissions for
Transportation Equipment; Interstate Rail carriers, revised as of July 1, 1995.
Federal Transit Administration. "Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment. " Federal Transit
Administration, Office of Policy Development, Washington, DC (April 1995).
LTK Engineering Services, Inc. "Southern California Regional Rail Authority: Horn Investigation
Report. " Technical report prepared for the Southern California Regional Rail Authority (November 12,
1993).
LTK. Engineering Services, Inc. "Southern California Regional Rail Authority: Sound Level and Seismic
Level Survey. " Technical report prepared for the Southern California Regional Rail Authority (February
1996).
Mestre Greve Associates, Inc. "Noise Assessment of North County Transit Passing Track." Technical
report prepared for North County Transit District, Oceanside, California (February 1997).
United States Code. "Public Law 103 -440, Title 49, United States Code, Section 20153. " (November 2,
1994).
Technical Report
Noise and Vibration Impacts of Commuter Rail Operations
Page 9
DAN PATCH CORRIDOR
Commuter Rail Feasibility Study
Tec h-mic a-11 Report-.,,
Impacts of Rail Transit
Operations on Property- Values,
March 9. 2001.
Submitted to: -
Dakota County Regional Railroad Authority
Submitted by:
PARSONS
-=VVAMio-o O BRINCKERHOFF
BIKO ASSOCIATES
I NCO R P O R A T E D
IMPACTS OF RAIL TRANSIT OPERATIONS ON PROPERTY VALUES
Background and General Conclusions
A literature review was conducted to determine how commercial and residential property values have
historically been impacted by rail transit operations in the United States, Canada, and England. The
overall conclusion drawn from the review is that rail transit operations "...increase property values, and
the amount of the increase depends on the specifics of the city, the system, and local land use policies,
and can range from no increase to a substantial increase" (Stanger 1999).
Several articles have been written to document studies on impacts to commercial and residential property
values that result from rail transit operations. The studies have been conducted on different rail transit
technology perspectives (including commuter, rapid, and light rail) and have been based on different
methodologies (e.g., capitalization theory of value, hedonic price modeling based on cross - sectional data,
and longitudinal data on property value changes over time). The lack of a standardized perspective and
methodology, plus location - specific factors, makes it difficult to compare the results of one study to
another and contributes to some of the contradictory results that have been reported over the years.
Nevertheless, it is the general conclusion of all the research and analysis conducted since 1984, that
rail transit positively impacts commercial and residential property values in the vicinity of rail transit
stations and does not negatively impact commercial or residential property values between stations.
Exceptions to these general findings have been documented, however.
Positive Impacts on Property Values
Whether discussing commuter rail, rapid rail, or light rail, the operating characteristics that contribute to
increased property values are the same. These largely relate to the ability of rail transit to improve
accessibility to the location where the transit station is located. Accessibility refers to the reduction in
transportation time or enhanced access from one relatively large area or set of residential sub - markets to
and from travel origins and destinations in other area (Gruen 1997). As a result of improved accessibility,
commuters (both apartment residents and single family home residents) find proximity to transit stations
to be a convenience they are willing to pay for. (See the graph on page 2.) Likewise, businesses that can
expand their customer base to include commuters, consider locations in proximity to transit stations to be
highly desirable.
Residential Property:
A 1994 study conducted along the MBTA's (Boston commuter rail) Fitchburg line
included all communities that fell more than 50 percent within an area approximately 10
miles from the line. The study was conducted to determine property value impacts on
residential properties and focused both on areas near stations and areas between the
stations. Results showed that single family residences located in communities with a
Technical Report
Impacts of Rail Transit on Property Values
Page 1
commuter rail station had a market value approximately 6.7 percent greater than those
that did not (Armstrong 1994).
Research conducted in 1990 showed that single family home values declined by $1 to $2
per meter distance from BART (San Francisco rapid rail) stations in Alameda and Contra
Costa Counties (Landis et al. 1995).
A 1997 study conducted in the Chicago area that included data from 1,300 single family
homes concluded that whether located in lower- or higher- income neighborhoods,
proximity to CTA (rapid rail) and Metra (commuter rail) stations positively affects the
value of single family homes. All other factors equal, home prices decline as distance
from a station increases. For example, a home 500 feet from a station has a value 26
percent greater than a comparable home a mile away. This relationship is statistically
significant (Gruen 1997).
With a study area defined as a one -mile radius from BART's (rapid rail) Pleasant Hill
station, average home prices declined by approximately $1,578 for every 100 .feet
distance from the station (Lewis- Workman 1997).
Commercial Property:
Commercial space in Los Angeles was found to have an additional $31 increase in mean
sale price per square foot over the mean sales price of a comparable control group outside
the rail corridor, between 1980 and 1990. The rail corridor was defined as one -half mile
on either side of the track (Fejarang et al. 1994).
A city -wide analysis in Atlanta found that improved access was translated into increased
commercial property values, as the price per square meter of property decreased by $75
for every meter from MARTA (rapid rail) stations (Nelson 1998).
A city -wide analysis of over 2,800 commercial properties in Washington, DC, found that
increased access was a major factor that influenced commercial property value. The
study found that the price per square foot decreased by approximately $2.30 for every
1,000 feet further from a Metro (rapid rail) transit station (Federal Transit Administration
2000).
The following factors contribute to the positive impacts on commercial and residential property values in
the vicinity of rail transit stations:
• "the level of transit service;
• congestion on the region's streets and freeways;
• the design of the station; and
• transit - supportive land use policies" (Lieberman 1995).
Technical Report
Impacts of Rail Transit on Property Values
Page 3
The "level of transit service" relates to characteristics of the rail transit system itself and other supporting
transit systems are integrated with rail transit to increase accessibility to transit stations and enhance rail
transit's efficiency, effectiveness, and economy. Obviously, as the level of congestion increases on streets
and highways, more commuters will opt to use transit instead of their automobiles.
"Single family residential property values are sensitive to the quality of station design. Some studies have
indicated that the value of homes within walking distance of a station would suffer if the station were
noisy, had spillover station lighting" (Lieberman 1995), and did include an adequate traffic circulation
plan. On the other hand, there are numerous examples of rail transit stations that have been designed with
sensitivity to neighborhood concerns. This is why "the majority of studies show that home values have
increased with proximity to the station" (Lieberman, 1995).
A local jurisdiction's transit- supportive land use policies were viewed to be an important component that
can influence /control development patterns that sustain and positively impact property values. The
research indicated that three areas of interest should be considered when developing transit- supportive
land use policies:
• "involving the community in plans and designs and operations of the station;
• ensuring that noise levels generated by rail transit operations do not impact nearby
residences; and
• minimizing the impact of increased pedestrian and auto traffic on quiet residential
streets" (Lieberman 1995).
Presented on the following pages are 14 photographs of different land uses along the New Jersey Transit
commuter rail line, which operates between communities in northern New Jersey and New York City.
Photographs 1 through 6 show single family residences that are between stations, along the commuter rail
right -of -way. Photographs 7 through 10 show single family residences adjacent to a commuter rail
station. Photograph 11 shows a recently constructed townhome development adjacent to a commuter rail
station and park- and -ride lot. Photograph 12 shows commercial uses across the street from a commuter
rail station. Finally, photographs 13 and 14 show mixed use (commercial/residential) land uses across the
street from a commuter rail station.
Negative Impacts on Property Values
Some of the literature indicates rail transit has the potential to negatively impact property values, both at
station locations and along line -haul segments (between stations). The chart that follows pin- points
factors that can contribute to decreased property values.
The two studies referenced in the following chart (prepared by Landis and Armstrong) are the only ones
that discuss severe decreases in property values for residences located between stations: All other studies
cited either na impact or a positive impact. The authors of these two studies have provided cautionary
explanations (quoted and italicized in the charts) for their observations.
Technical Report
Impacts of Rail Transit on Property Values
Page 4
Technical Report
Impacts of Rail Transit on Property Values
Page 5
t
Technical Report
Impacts of Rail Transit on Property Values
Page 6
I .
LAND USE
LOCATION
Near a Transit Station
Between Stations
Residential
The property values of residences, typically within walking distance of
In a study of the CalTrain system (commuter rail), it was
the station, are negatively impacted where transit stations are poorly
concluded that the negative externalities associated with being
designed. Nuisances that affect property values are: parking that spills
extremely close to an at -grade rail transit line were not
over to residential streets, excessive traffic that circulates on residential
necessarily capitalized into home values, where homes within
streets, excessive noise from traffic, and lighting from the parking area
300 meters Q2&4@9&?6f the CalTrain track sold at a discount of
that spills over to nearby residences (Nelson and McClesky 1990).
$51,000 in 1990 (Landis et al. 1994).
According to Landis, "... the CalTrain system did not generate
property value benefits similar to those of the BART system
because CalTrain offered limited accessibility benefits.
Compared to CalTrain, BART had a superior level of transit
service and greater parking capacity. In addition, the negative
impact observed in areas close to the station was believed to
have been caused by the high noise levels generated by the
CalTrain service. CalTrain was described as being much louder
than the BART system. Tlie CalTrain trackbed is mini►nally
separated from adjacent uses, and given that the CalTrain train
cars are not specifically designed for quiet operation, this is not
a surprising finding. "
As much as a 20 percent decrease in residential property value
{
was found for residences within 400 feet of MBTA's Fitchburg
line, which shares tracks with active freight service (Armstrong
1994).
According to Armstrong, "The fact that both freight rail service
and commuter rail service operate upon the Fitchburg line...
snakes it difficult, if not impossible, to accurately differentiate
between the two separate sources of proximity impacts.
Therefore, the findings concerning the effects of commuter rail -
generated proximity impacts, independent of freight rail
proximity impacts, are inconclusive. "
Commercial
The value of commercial property is rarely, if ever, negatively
The value of commercial property is rarely, if ever, negatively
impacted by rail transit operations, Studies indicate that when
impacted by rail transit operations (Gruen 1997).
commercial values have fallen, factors other than rail transit are
contributors; e.g., an oversupply of commercials ace (Gruen 1997).
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Armstrong, R.J. 'Impacts of Commuter Rail Service as Reflected in Single Family Residential Property Values. " Paper presented at the 73rd
Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC (1994).
Federal Transit Administration, 2000. "Transit Benefits 2000 Working Papers: A Public Choice Policy Analysis. " Washington, DC. Federal
Transit Administration, Office of Policy Development.
Fejarang, R.A. 'Impact of Property Values: A Study of the Los Angeles Metro Rail. " Paper presented at the 73rd Annual Meeting of the
Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC (1994).
Gruen, Nina. "The Effect of CTA and METRA Stations on Residential Property Values: A Report to the Regional Transportation Authority. " (June
1997.)
Landis, John, Robert Cervero, Subhrajit Guhatthukurta, David Loutzenheiser, and Ming Zhang. Rail Transit Investments, Real Estate Values, and
Land Use Change: a Comparative Analysis qf Five California Rail Transit Systems." Monograph 48, Institute of Urban and Regional Studies,
University of California at Berkley (1995).
Lewis- Workman, Steven and Daniel Brod. "Measuring the Neighborhood Benefits of Rail Transit Accessibility. " Transportation Research Board
1576, pp 147 -153 (1997).
Lieberman, William. 'Impacts of Rail Transit on Residential Property Value. " Memorandum to the Metropolitan Transit Development Board of
San Diego, California (1995).
Nelson, Arthur C. "Transit Stations and Commercial Property Values: Case Study with Policy and Land Use Implications. " Paper presented at the
77th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC (1998).
Nelson, Arthur C. and Susan J. McCloskey. 'Improving the Effects of the Elevated Transit station on Neighborhoods. " Transportation Research
Record 1266: 173 (1990).
Stanger, Richard. "Transit and Urban Form, Volume I. " Transit Cooperative Research - Program Report 16, Transportation Research Board,
National Research Council, Washington, DC (1999).
EDINA PARK BOARD
7:00 P.M.
EDINA ART CENTER
APRIL 10, 2001
MEMBERS PRESENT
MEMBERS ABSENT
STAFF PRESENT
Michael Damman, Floyd Grabiel, David Fredlund, George Klus,
Karla Sitek, Ardis Wexler, Tom White, Andy Finsness, John
Munro
Linda Prestlius
John Keprios, Ed MacHolda, Janet Canton, Diana Hedges
I. APPROVAL OF THE MARCH 13, 2001 PARK BOARD MINUTES
Floyd Grabiel MOVED TO APPROVE THE MARCH 13, 2001 PARK BOARD
MINUTES. Dave Fredlund SECONDED THE MOTION. MINUTES APPROVED.
II. TOUR OF THE EDINA ART CENTER & PRESENTATION - DIANA HEDGES,
ART CENTER DIRECTOR
Diana Hedges, Art Center Director, indicated that she started working for the Edina Art
Center 15 years ago. She noted that when she first started there were approximately
1,200 students and today they are at over 7,000 and added that they have become both
state as well as nationally known. Ms. Hedges pointed out that they also have had and
continue to. have instructors from all over the world come and teach at the Edina Art
Center..She indicated ,that they will be getting an instructor from China in a few weeks.
Ms. Hedges stated that they have also broadened their offerings and they do offer tie dye,
paper making and flower arranging, however, their focus is mainly on fine arts.
Ms. Hedges informed the Park Board that a few years back they had a cancellation rate of
about 40% to 50% and now their cancellation rate is 3 %. She noted that pottery has been
their biggest growth area and that is why they are proposing to build an addition on the
west side of the building to hopefully bring in more revenue in renting out studios. Ms.
Hedges explained that after doing research at various art facilities she found there are
waiting lists for people to rent studio space. She noted that she feels they could bring in a
lot of people.
Ms. Hedges explained that they have been doing a lot more outreach exhibits. Currently
at Jerry's Cafe is Bradley Benn's, Ediila Art Center Assistant Director, exhibit of clay
fish. She noted that they switch their exhibits every three to four months. Also, they
have outreach exhibits at the Opus building, Northland and the library on 50"' Street. Ms.
Hedges indicated that they are currently working on getting an exhibit set up with 10 to
12 prints that Art Dickey made. Mr. Dickey was an Art Center Board member who
recently passed away.
Mr. Keprios explained that the Art Center Board reports directly to the City Council and
are not subordinate to the Park Board. He noted that the Art Center Board meets once a
month and has 11 members, however, they currently have ten and are looking for a new
member. It was noted that Jim Van Valkenburg is the Chairman of the Art Center
Board.
The Park Board then went on a tour of the Art Center and thanked Ms. Hedges for her
report.
III. RECREATIONAL FACILITIES REFERENDUM UPDATE - JOHN KEPRIOS
Mr. Klus commented that he has talked to some people who still think the dome is part of
the referendum and noted that a lot of people are misinformed on what is happening. Mr.
Keprios handed out an informational brochure on the referendum that will be mailed to
all residents by the end of the week. He noted that the publicity piece clearly shows that
there is no dome in the proposal. It outlines everything that is being proposed (who,
what, why and where) as well as what the tax impact is. It also shows where people. can
vote and who to call to ask questions. Mr. Keprios commented that Jennifer Wilkinson,
Communications Director, has done an outstanding job on the brochure.
Mr. Keprios indicated that he gave tluee presentations yesterday and two today. He
commented that he is going to give a presentation to the athletic boosters tomorrow night.
Also, there is going to be a very heavily attended presentation hosted by the League of
Women Voters on April 30" at the Community Center. He explained that he will give his
power point presentation and afterwards there will be a debate between the vote yes
proponents and the vote no opponents. He indicated that this meeting will be publicized
in the Sun Newspaper and that it Nvi 11 also be put video taped and played on cable
television. He stated that there will likely be some very challenging questions.
Mr. Keprios pointed out that it has become real evident to him that a lot of the athletic
association board members don't know anything about this and that really shocks him.
Therefore, he is going to mail out a notice to all 209 youth athletic association board
members inviting them to attend an informational presentation on the referendum
followed by questions and answers. He noted that he has heard that some of these board
members have actually been talking negatively about the referendum. He stated that
these are the people who one would expect,to be promoting the referendum. He wants to
be sure that this group gets the opportunity to hear all the facts.
Mr. Murrin indicated that the "Vote Yes" committee has held a number of meetings and
have been asking for contributions. He stated that he has contributed $100.00 towards it
and asked if anyone would like to make a contribution he will be make sure it gets to the
appropriate people. He noted that within the next few weeks the "Vote Yes" committee
is planning on setting up tables and stands at functions around town. He commented that
he feels that they are very well organized. Mr. Murrin indicated that he finds it
interesting that there is such an active group that is opposed to the referendum. Mr.
Murrin asked if anyone has a feeling on how the public is responding, whether it's
positive or negative. Mr. Grabiel indicated that all he has seen in the Sun Current has
been negative to which it was noted that in today's Sun Current everything was positive.
Mr. White explained that Linda Presthus asked.him to hand out to the Park Board
members a memo. He noted that Ms. Presthus is a co -chair of the "Vote Yes" committee.
He stated that there are specific things she would like the Park Board members to do if
they are willing. Mr. White noted that she would like everyone to fill out a "Vote Yes"
card which authorizes them to use your name and say you are in support of the
referendum. Also, if you could hand them out to nine other friends and neighbors of
Edina and ask them to do the same thing. He noted that there is also an area to mark if
you would be interested in having a lawn sign.
Ms. Sitek indicated that she has been hearing from people that it is their understanding
that if any problems come up that money will be taken from the general fund and it's
going to take away from textbooks, teachers, etc. She asked Mr. Murrin if that is true to
which Mr. Murrin replied that it is false. Mr. Murrin explained that the School District
spends a certain amount for maintenance. He also noted that some of their buildings are
in need of major improvements and will need to be done whether or not there is a
referendum. He also stated that they will be able to support all of the uses. He added that
this is a revenue producer for them at night and that they are not going to lose any money
and will be able to pay for all of their expenses. Ms. Sitek indicated that that needs to be
shouted out because that is not what people think. Mr. Murrin stated that this is
unfortunate that people are making this an issue when it's not an issue at all. Mr.
Finsness asked if it's not an issue then why is it happening. Mr. Murrin replied because
it's an easy target. People think that because we are absorbing more responsibilities we
are taking away from the kids. However, we've done the math and we can pay for it all.
Also, we would be saving on all sorts of improvements that have to get done regardless of
the referendum.
Mr. Keprios indicated that same question came up after his power point presentation last
night at the DFL District gathering and Peyton Robb's response was identical to Mr.
Murrin's. Mr. Robb indicated that to keep it in perspective they anticipate they will
generate roughly $165,000 in revenue in fees and charges from both the pools and the
gymnasiums. lie noted that what is left over the school is going to absorb within its
general operating budget, approximately $48,000 to $50,000. He also commented that
with a 50 million dollar operating budget there is some leeway room and therefore it is
not an issue.
Mr. Klus asked for an update on the Joint Powers Organization. Mr. Keprios replied that
they just had their second meeting and they have interviewed five finalists out of 12 for
the Construction Manager position and they hope to select a finalist on Friday.
3
A
Everything is moving right along. Mr. Keprios also noted that the Facilities Use
Agreement and the Joint Powers Agreement have been signed, delivered and approved by
both elected bodies and is in place, legal and binding.
IV. OFF -LEASH DOG PARK STUDY AND PROPOSAL - GREG INGRAHAM,
INGRAHAM & ASSOCIATES
Mr. Keprios explained that the City Council directed him to look at different areas within
the city to determine if there is a reasonable site for an off -leash dog park and specifically
Creek Valley Park. Mr. Keprios then introduced Greg Ingraham from Ingraham &
Associates Consulting firm whom was commissioned to look at the potential sites for an
off -leash dog park.
Mr. Ingraham indicated that he worked with city park and police staff to identify potential
sites and came up with four areas. He pointed out that some of the criteria they looked
for was size, access and visibility as well as flat areas. Mr. Ingraham explained that all
four sites could work, however, all four were marginal at best and there was no one great
site.
Mr. Ingraham noted that Creek Valley was one of the four sites they looked at and
showed an aerial photo of the location and explained the site noting that it could work.
However, the one thing it does lack is a flat area because it's fairly rolling. He added that
Creek Valley does have a lot of uses in the summer and has primarily ice skating in the
winter. He noted that the green marking outlined on the map is where the rink is located
and it could cause a problem because dog parks are used 365 days a year which may
make it, hard to manage. However, the pink area marked would work fairly well.
Mr. Ingraham explained that the Walnut Ridge site from the physical aspect of the park
land does work quite well and is probably the best site in terms of physical space. There
is a large flat area that is not programmed for active recreation use and it has a loop trail
around it. However, the drawbacks are it's a hard park to get to and it's a neighborhood
park, not a community type of park.
Mr. Ingraham indicated that Van Valkenburg was another site that was looked at which is
right by the ball field complex. He explained that the drawback to this site is there is not
a lot of flat area. It would work but again it is a marginal site and lacks an open area.
Mr. Ingraham showed where the Braemar site could be located and noted that it would be
by where the old gun range was. He indicated that he feels this could be a good site in
the future if it was combined with an aesthetic upgrade of the public works facility and
use the dog park as a sort of transition to the maintenance activities. Mr. Ingraham
pointed out that this site is also being proposed for a regional police /fire training facility.
He noted that he doubts everything could be put on this one site and make it function. He
noted that Braemar would certainly be an adequate area.
4
Mr. Ingraham indicated that all of the areas he mentioned do have parking areas and
noted that there would be various fencing costs. He stated that on the whole scale of
things dog parks are relatively cheap to develop and maintain and do work quite well.
However, lie did not see one site that lie could say he thinks.would be great. He noted he
feels all of them would work and would get used because there is definitely a demand for
it.
Mr. Grabiel asked how do these sites compare in size with the site Minneapolis wants to
use to which Mr. Keprios replied that the Minneapolis site is a little over four acres and
the sites mentioned tonight are 2.5 to 3 acres.
Mr. Klus asked why,is there such a sudden interest in this and asked if they are trying to
appease someone. Mr. Keprios replied that the City Council has directed him to look at
the Creek Valley site specifically as well as all o f Edina to see to see if it would be
feasible to put in an off -leash dog park.
Mr. Keprios indicated that he did talk to the Chief of Police and Chief Siitari informed
him that he would not be in favor of any of the sites mentioned for an off -leash dog park
unless he was given additional resources to enforce it.
Mr. Ingraham commented that both the City of Bloomington and Ramsey County have an
off -leash dog site and both have said that for the most part they are self - enforcing. He
indicated that basically they only have to go there to empty the trash.
Mr. Damman asked if the City did decide to designate a place for an off -leash dog site
would there be any legal ramifications to the City if a dog were to attack someone, etc.
Mr. Ingraham replied that it's his understanding that it's no different than any other
liability, he doesn't think it would heighten anything.
Ms. Wexler asked if this goes to the City Council is there recourse for the people in the
community who simply do not want it at a particular site. Mr. Keprios responded that
there would likely be a public hearing before it would actually be implemented.
Mr. Murrin indicated that he doesn't have a dog and he doesn't have a charitable feeling
either way, however, Walnut Ridge seems to be an area that may have less human use
and would be an acceptable site for an off -leash dog park. He noted that he thinks it
would actually be a positive to the neighborhood and not a negative.
John Murrin MOVED THAT THE WALNUT RIDGE PARK BE DEVELOPED INTO
AN OFF -LEASH DOG PARK.
Mr. Murrin commented that we should see if neighborhood problems prevail or if it
becomes a cost issue for enforcement for the Edina Police Department. Mr. Murrin
commented that he sees our function as a park board to be able to be innovative and at
least get things to- the-table he would hate to see this thing just not be- forwarded.
THE MOTION FAILED DUE TO A LACK OF A SECOND.
Floyd Grabiel MOVED THAT THE PARK BOARD RECOMMEND THAT THE CITY
COUNCIL PROCEED WITH FURTHER INVESTIGATING THE FEASIBILITY OF
THE DOG PARK AT EITHER THE CREEK VALLEY OR THE BRAEMAR SITE.
John Murrin SECONDED THE NIOTION.
Ms. Sitek indicated that she would like to go back and look at the site that Minneapolis
proposed. Mr. Klus noted that he agrees with Ms. Sitek, the best site is the Minneapolis
site over by Weber Park. He indicated that we need the City Council to see that the site
Minneapolis wants to use is the best area and it's the flattest area of all of the other sites
presented tonight. Also, it is currently being used as an unofficial off -leash dog site. In
addition, it is also going to get the least amount of friction from the community compared
to the other sites mentioned. Mr. White stated that Minneapolis would also pay for the
fencing and maintenance as well as putting in a parking lot. Therefore, it wouldn't
become an expense to the City of Edina.
Mr. Grabiel indicated that he would like to speak in support of his motion. He noted that
with the Braemar site and the Creek Valley site there are no neighbors to worry about.
He stated that with Van Valkenburg and Walnut Ridge there are neighbors to worry
about. Therefore, that is why he likes the Braemar and Creek Valley sites and really likes
Braemar the best. He noted there are a lot of people within the City of Edina who have
an interest in having an off. -leash dog park. He stated that frankly he doesn't like the idea
of the Minmeapolis Park Board coming in and putting their park within the City of Edina
limits. If we think in Edina we need an off -leash dog park than lets put one in Edina, on
Edina park land where we can control what happens. If Minneapolis comes in even with
a joint powers agreement we lose control and that is why he favors this and does not
favor the Minneapolis site.
Mr. Klus commented that he thinks we would have just as much control on the
Minneapolis site as we would on our own site. He noted that he felt after everything was
debated that we were going to still be able to provide something to the residents of Edina
and it was going to be fair and we were going to have control. Also, we were going to
say that if it didn't workout we would ask them to move and we wouldn't allow it to go
on.
Mr. Keprios asked is your motion to further study it to which Mr. Grabiel responded his
motion was to recommend to the City Council that we proceed with an off-leash dog park
site at either Braemar or Creek Valley, which would be just the pink area shown.
Mr. White asked all in favor of Floyd Grabiel's motion to go forward with either the
Creek Valley site or the Braemar site.
IN FAVOR: Floyd Grabiel, Andy Finsness, Ardis Wexler, John Murrin
,:1
OPPOSED: Dave Fredlund, George Klus, Karla Sitek, Tom White
ABSTAINED: Mike Damman
MOTION DID NOT PASS.
George Klus MOVED THAT WE ASK THE CITY COUNCIL TO CONSIDER THE
OFF -LEASH DOG PARK AT THE PROPOSED MINNEAPOLIS PUBLIC WORKS
SITE ALONG FRANCE AVENUE.
Mr. Finsness asked if the City Council is aware of the Minneapolis proposed off -leash
dog site to which Mr. Keprios replied that he believes that they are familiar with it.
Mr. White asked Mr. Klus if his motion then would be to direct Mr. Keprios to contact
the Minneapolis Park Board again. Mr. Klus noted that he would say that his motion
would say that we recommend to the City Council to consider only the France Avenue
site at this time, which we have already evaluated.
Mr. Klus restated his motion to RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT THE
ONLY OFF -LEASH DOG PARK TO BE CONSIDERED AT THIS TIME BE THE
FRANCE AVENUE SITE.
Karla Sitek SECONDED THE MOTION.
Mr. Grabiel asked if the Police Chief's opinion has changed where he doesn't want us to
take on Minneapolis problems and be responsible. Mr. White noted that he can't believe
his opinion has changed. Mr. Keprios noted that the Police Chief would support the
Minneapolis Public Works site only if they meet the demands that have been stipulated.
Mr. Klus noted that all we are doing is going back to the City Council to look at that. He
noted that he is saying that is the one that we would rather see them look at.
All In Favor: George Klus, Karla Sitek, John Murrin, Dave Fredlund, Andy Finsness,
Ardis Wexler, Tom White
Opposed: Floyd Grabiel
Abstain: Mike Damman
V. POLICE & FIRE TRAINING FACILITY, BRAEMAR PARK SITE — PARK
BOARD CHAIRMAN, MR. TOM WHITE
Mr. White explained that there used to be a gun range at Braemar Park by the arena that
was torn down about six years ago. Since then it has been proposed to be used for a
police /fire training facility for the surrounding municipalities. Mr. White indicated that
when you look at all of the other surrouuuling communities such as Eden Prairie and
Eagan they have a lot more open space than Edina. Therefore, he would like to see a
VA
recommendation be made to the City Council that a police /fire training facility be located
in another city and that we use that land for Edina residents. Mr. Keprios pointed out that
Edina has just been awarded $500,000, after all of these years, to go ahead with the
facility. It is now just a matter of getting the final approval of all other municipalities and
the Metropolitan Airport Commission.
Mr. Murrin asked if the City would be getting a lot of money for having the facility put
on Edina property. Mr. Keprios responded that the Edina Police'and Fire Departments
would save money in the long run because they wouldn't have to travel outside the city
limits for their training. Other than that the Park Department would.not receive any
money from this facility. Mr. Murrin rioted that if that's the case he would vote against
having the facility. Mr. Grabiel asked if the Park Department would receive any fees
generated to which Mr. Keprios replied no.
Mr. Keprios indicated that he would like to have had this discussion a long time ago. Mr.
White commented that for the record he has been talking about this since he became a
Park Board member four years ago. Mr. Keprios indicated that at this point in time he
cannot recommend that we not follow through with the training facility at this site.
John Murrin MOVED TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT WE
ADAMANTLY DECLINE THE OPPORTUNITY TO HAVE A POLICE/FIRE
TRAINING FACILITY AT BRAEM.-�R AND THAT IT BE MOVED TO A
DIFFERENT MUNICIPALITY THAT HAS MORE OPEN SPACE. Floyd Grabiel
SECONDED THE MOTION.
Mr. Keprios noted that if this is to go forward as a police and fire training facility then
perhaps the recommendation should also state something about it being open and
available to the public at certain times. Mr. White stated that he doesn't want a gun range
of any type at Braemar. He indicated that if the City Council ends up putting in a training
facility at Braemar then Mr. Keprios cLm make a recommendation to the City Council at
that time.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
VI. PRIORITY USE OF EDINA' SCHEDULED OUTDOOR ATHLETIC
FACILITIES
Mr. Keprios explained that after last month's Park Board meeting he took all of the
recommendations and comments and put together a new draft. He noted that the Park
Board made some excellent suggestions for changes. He indicated that Mr. MacHolda
has sent out this current draft along with a memo to the athletic associations so they can
look it over. The memo also invites all youth athletic association presidents to the May
Park Board meeting to discuss the proposal, as well as, take advantage of the opportunity
to discuss any other current youth athletic program related issues. Mr. White indicated
that if anyone has any other suggestions to give Mr. Keprios a call. Mr. Keprios pointed
8
J
out that the only facilities they are talking about are the scheduled outdoor facilities
because there is so much demand for them.
Mr. Grabiel indicated that he is still not so sure about priority #7 and he will have to give
it some more thought. Mr. White indicated that Mr. Keprios was going to talk to the City
Attorney about priority #7. It was asked if that should be taken off completely. Mr.
White suggested making it more content neutral to which Mr. Grabiel suggested taking
priority #7 out and making priority #8 now priority #7.
VII. EDINBOROUGH PARK USE STUDY
Mr. Keprios explained that his staff conducted a survey on their own for Edinborough
Park customers. The results indicated that the majority of their use is by non - residents.
He noted that people are willing to pay a fee to use the park and therefore they are
looking at some ideas to capture some revenues. He stated that they are going to need an
additional revenue source within the not to distant future to stay financially solvent. He
added that they are still not on a break -even basis. The trust fund that keeps bailing them
out is going to last several more years, however, when that's gone they will have nothing
to fall back on other than the City's general budget. Mr. Klus asked Mr. Keprios what
user fees are not being collected right now that he could see collecting in the future. Mr.
Keprios replied that the entire great hall and grotto area is free and is heavily used
especially during the winter months. He noted that kids come in by the busloads from
daycare centers and take over the great hall at no charge.
Mr. Keprios pointed out that the little skating rink area is a major operating expense for
Edinborough Park. He noted that when it gets to the point where it needs to be redone or
upgraded perhaps they will look at putting in a large play structure in place of the indoor
ice rink. The currently play structure is way too small for the amount of kids that play on
it. The structure does not meet current safety standards and the area is not accessible.
This is something that we will probably need to look at in the near future.
VIII. OTHER
A. Centennial Lakes Skating Rink - Mr. Keprios pointed out that at Centennial Lakes
this past winter they had less skaters but made more money. He noted that the increase in
fees, skate rentals and sled rentals is probably what lead to the significant change in
dollars. Mr. Keprios noted that Centennial Lakes is still the greatest area for outdoor
recreational skating in the Twin Cities area if not the whole state.
IX. ADJOURNMENT
Floyd Grabiel MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 8:50 P.M. John Murrin
SECONDED THE MOTION. MEETING ADJOURNED.
9
Darlene Wallin
rom: David Willard [willard1 @pclink.com]
sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 2:50 PM
To: dmaetzold @ci.edina.mn.us
Subject: Referendum
This May 16 referendum, if passed, will be staggeringly unfair to those of us who reside in Edina, in name only, but are in
the Hopkins school district.
None of our activities are in Edina, we shop, play and educate ourselves in Hopkins. The closest thing to using an Edina
facility is when we walk our dog through Alden park.
The epitome of the senslessness of the referendum is the shades for the dugouts at the ball fields. What madness. Think
about it.
I once thought Edina was an island of sanity in the insane world of Minnesota taxation. No more.
David Willard
408 Madison Avenue South
Hopkins, MN
Mt E,.l.",T'R�0 DICiES' T,
April, 2001
A digest of actions taken by the Metropolitan Council, Metropolitan Airports Commission, Metropolitan Parks & Open Space
Commission and Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission. Minutes of all Council and Commission meetings are filed with
the Legislative Reference Library, 645 State Office Building, 6th Floor, in St. Paul for a period of up to two years and can be
viewed by the public. Call the appropriate commission or operations area for meeting information and /or specific questions.
Metropolitan Council
The Metropolitan Council is located at Mears Park Centre, 230 E. Fifth St., St. Paul, MN, 55101. For further information
regarding the contents of this publication, contact Sandra Lindstrom at (651) 602 -1390. The Council's general number is (651)
602 -1000, TDD: (651) 291 -0904. Call the Metro Information Line at (651) 602 -1888 for recorded information about
upcoming Council meetings and regional events, current job openings and Section 8 housing information. Recent Council
publications can be found at major public libraries in the Metro Area. Publications can be ordered by a -mail. The address is:
data. center @metc.state.mn.us Comments can be made to that address as well as (651) 602 -1500, the Metro Council Public
Comment Line. Check the internet web site at http: / /Www.metrocouncil.org.
The Council...
Environment
• authorized MCES's Wastewater Services
General Manager to negotiate, and its
Regional Administrator to execute, an
amendment to the engineering design
services contract with Montgomery Watson
for the Minneapolis Interceptor, in an
amount not to exceed $265,000 for MCES
Project No. 800400, MCES Contract No.
00P0065.
authorized its Regional Administrator to
issue a purchase order for procurement of
flat aluminum tank covers for the Metro
Plant, MCES Project No. 970624, to
Thermacon Enviro Systems, Lake Success,
New York, for their low bid of $282,823.
• authorized its Regional Administrator to
award and execute a contract for
construction of the MWWTP Relief Well
Rehabilitation Project, MCES Project No
980503, with Lametti and Sons, 16028
North Forrest Blvd., Hugo, MN, for their
low bid of $1,020,710.
authorized its Regional Administrator to
enter into an agreement with Dakota County
for a volume study of the Vermillion River
Watershed in an amount not to exceed
$150,000, as part of the Rosemount- Empire
planning study, MCES Project No. 800900.
authorized the MCES Division Director to
accept and expend $135,000 from the
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
(MPCA) for assistance in conducting a
Mercury Total Maximum Daily Load
(TMDL) Study.
increased the delegated change order
authority of its General Manager of
Wastewater Services for the Blue Lake
Wastewater Treatment Plant Groundwater
Relief System, Project No. 980200, from
$190,000 to $739,000; and amended the
2001 MCES Capital Budget by increasing
the funding authorization for Project 980200
by $500,000 to $5,600,000, and by
decreasing the funding authorization for
Project 910200 (Blue Lake Solids) by
$500,000 to $28,550,000.
D 'T
ME`.'T'R�O 1(iES 51
authorized its Regional Administrator to
issue a purchase order for procurement of
Final Settling Tank Sludge Withdrawal
Headers for the Metro Plant, to Metro
Manufacturing, Inc., 465 Kenny Road, St.
Paul, MN for their low bid of $585,963.
authorized its Regional Administrator to
issue a purchase order for procurement of
Final Settling Tank Sludge, Withdrawal
Piping for the Metro Plant to Plant and
Flanged Co., 10101 Xylite Street NE,
Blaine, MN for their low bid of
$289,872.77.
authorized its Regional Administrator to
negotiate and execute a professional
services agreement for facility planning and
design services for the Metropolitan .
Wastewater Treatment Standby Power
Upgrade Project with Sebesta Blomberg at a
cost not to exceed $323,758.
authorized its Regional Administrator to
negotiate and execute a professional
services agreement for facility planning
services for the Empire Wastewater
Treatment Plant Miscellaneous
Improvements Project, MCES Project No.
940104, with Montgomery Watson at a cost
not to exceed $160,000.
authorized its Regional Administrator to
submit loan applications to the Minnesota
Public Facilities Authority for the following
projects:
#8001 LS Supervisory Control & Field
Telemetry
2. #8004 Minneapolis Interceptor 1 -MN-
320 Rehabilitation
3. #8010 Dayton- Champlin Interceptor
4. #8009 Rosemount/Empire Plant
Services Area Capacity
5. #8013 Maple Plan/Long Lake
Interceptor Improvements.
• ratified a Justification and Declaration of
Emergency for the installation of additional
well points and sump pumps to protect the
Blue Lake Wastewater Treatment Plant from
flood conditions on the Minnesota River.
ratified a Justification and Declaration of
Emergency for the construction of a
temporary road to allow access to the
Metropolitan Wastewater Treatment Plant
during flood conditions on the Mississippi
River.
Management
authorized its Regional Administrator to
negotiate and execute a contract with
General Security Services Corporation to
provide security guard services for the
Environmental Services Facilities for a two -
year period, with an option to renew for two
additional years.
approved and published the 2000
Metropolitan Agencies Consolidated
Financial Report.
Regional Growth Policy Issues
reviewed the City of Anoka's
Comprehensive Plan and adopted the
Executive Summary and Review Record
with the following recommendations:
1. The City of Anoka can put its 1999
Draft Community Plan into effect and
no plan modifications are required.
2. The city is strongly encouraged to
become more pro- active in terms of its
Page 2 April, 2001
a
M 17T]R�0 'T
A -, A E. A\, DICiES
future development plans and to re-
examine the potential future use of
vacant public lands in the city for
additional residential or mixed -use
development. As a station site for the
new North Star commuter rail corridor,
Anoka should actively plan to take
advantage of its location by planning to
increase densities and promote
redevelopment in the proposed station
area. Such action would help the
commuter rail to be more cost effective
and allow the city to reach or exceed
Council forecasts.
3. The Anoka Community Plan
should be amended to include
the following information to
ensure Critical Area
consistency:
a. Include the purposes of the
Mississippi River Corridor as a
Critical Area designation (Executive
Order 79 -19, Sections A and B);
b. Reference the city's 1980 approved
Mississippi River Corridor Critical
Areas Plan and subsequent DNR
approved plan amendments;
The text should clarify that all
activities impacting lands within the
designated Critical Area and
MNRRA boundary will be
consistent with the city's Critical
Area plan and state Critical Area
standards and guidelines.
4. The Anoka Community Plan may
include the purposes of the designation
of the Mississippi National River and
Recreation Area by the National Park
Service to address the intent to achieve
Page 3
MNRRA conformance.
5. Upon the approval of the city's
comprehensive plan and prior to the
construction of any extensions or
additions to its disposal system, the city
must submit a Comprehensive Sewer
Plan (Tier Il Plan) to the Council for
final approval.
• reviewed the City of Hampton's
Comprehensive Plan Update and adopted
the Executive Summary and Review Record
with the following recommendations:
1. The City of Hampton may place its
Comprehensive Plan Update into effect
with no plan modifications.
2. If the city plans to alter, expand or
improve its sewage disposal system, it
must first submit the Tier II
Comprehensive Sewer Plan to the
Council for its approval before the
sewer additions or alterations can be
initiated (Minnesota Statutes Section
473.513). Upon adoption of the
Comprehensive Plan by the city, the
Sewer Element of the plan should be
resubmitted to the Council to fulfill this
requirement.
• reviewed Burns Township's Comprehensive
Plan and adopted the Executive Summary
and Review Record with the following
recommendations:
1. Burns Township may place its
Comprehensive Plan Update into effect
with no plan modifications.
The Township is encouraged to plan for
maintaining rural character by limiting
the overall density of development to
one unit per 10 acres, clustering new
development, or using other planning
techniques that can balance the
April, 2001
M"E
11717r.R�o 'T
J-, A"& DlEiES
community's growth with preservation
of its rural heritage.
3. The plan should identify both TH 47
and CR 22 as "A" minor arterials
(connectors)..
4. The township should consider more
stringent standards for erosion and
sediment control if development activity
significantly exceeds the forecasted
growth.
• reviewed the City of Bloomington's
Comprehensive Plan Update and adopted
the Executive Summary and Review Record
with the following recommendations:
1. The City of Bloomington may puts its
Comprehensive Plan 2000 into effect,
excluding the Airport South District and
the France and Old Shakopee Road .
Areas, and rio plan modifications are
required.
The city must apply its previous
Comprehensive Plan to the areas known
as the Airport South District and the
France and Old Shakopee Road areas,
until such time as the city submits a
revised Comprehensive Plan for these
areas.
3. The plan meets all of the Metropolitan
Land Planning Act requirements for
1998 plan updates.
4. The city should assess and document
transportation impacts to the city, as a
whole, of the land uses planned for the
Airport South District and the France
and Old Shakopee Area at such time as
the final land use plans for these two
areas are completed.
The Council hereby authorizes its
Regional Administrator to enter into an
agreement with the City of Bloomington
establishing the conditions under which
the city will either commence a project
to divert extraneous wastewater flows
from the tributary area of MCES
interceptor 78 -04, or improve the
capacity. of the interceptor prior to
reaching surcharging conditions.
6. If the city has plans to alter, expand or
improve its sewage disposal system, it
must first submit the Tier II
Comprehensive Sewer Plan to the
Metropolitan Council for its approval
before any sewer additions or alterations
can be initiated, (Minnesota Statutes
Section 473.513). Upon adoption of the
Comprehensive Plan by the city, the
Sewer Element of the plan should be
resubmitted to the. Metropolitan Council
to fulfill this requirement.
• reviewed Scott County's Comprehensive
Plan Update and adopted the Executive
Summary and Review Record with the
following recommendations:
1. Scott County, and the 11 townships as
identified in this report, may place its
plan update into effect and no plan
modification is required.
2. Scott County is advised that the
Metropolitan Council acceptance of this
plan, and the Urban Expansion Areas
identified in the plan, does not obligate
the Metropolitan Council Environmental
Services (MCES), nor the Rural Growth
Centers, to provide sanitary sewer
service to those expansion areas.
3. Scott County should work with the
Metropolitan Council to identify a study
Page 4 April, 2001
area to explore the community
development potential along the I -35
corridor, including identification of
environmental features and natural
resources.
• reviewed the City of Maple Plain's
Comprehensive Plan Update and adopted
the Executive Summary and Review Record
with the following recommendations:
1. The City of Maple Plain may place its
2020 Comprehensive Plan into effect
with no plan modifications.
2. The plan meets all of the Metropolitan
Land Planning Act requirements for
1998 plan updates.
Upon approval of the city's
Comprehensive Plan and prior to the
construction or any extensions or
additions to its disposal system, the city
must submit a Comprehensive Sewer
Plan (Tier II Plan) to the Metropolitan
Council for final approval. The
Comprehensive Sewer Plan must be
consistent with the city's approved
Comprehensive Plan and reflect any
modifications recommended by the
Metropolitan Council.
4. The city will provide the Metropolitan
Council with an annual update on the
progress of the city in meeting its
Inflow/Infiltration goals.
The city will continue to monitor the
operations of its ISTS systems,
including assurance of
inspection/pumping on a three -year
cycle consistent with MPCA Rule
Chapter 7080 requirements.
6. Within 120 days of final Council action
on this plan, the city will adopt and
D I (i EE'�57 " r
implement land use controls consistent
with the Council's Interim Strategy to
Reduce Nonpoint Source Pollution to All
Metropolitan Water Bodies.
7. The Metropolitan Council will update its
Regional Growth Strategy map to
accurately reflect Maple Plain as
entirely in the Urban Area.
Transportation
• authorized its Regional Administrator to
execute an exchange agreement between the
United States Air Force and the Minnesota
Air National Guard, obligating the U.S. Air
Force to grant the Metropolitan Council
permanent rights to construct and operate
the Hiawatha Corridor LRT on U.S. Air
Force property at Fort Snelling in exchange
for improvements to this property for a
value not to exceed $2,085,000, which is an
increase from the $1.6 million identified in
the earlier business items passed on
December 20, 2000.
authorized its Regional Administrator to
enter into a 50 -50 joint powers funding
agreement with the City of Minneapolis
contingent upon Minneapolis City Council
approval to proceed with the proposed
redesign and construction of the retained
earth wall section between Lake Street and
28th Street to an elevated structure in an
amount not to exceed $2,906,191.
• authorized its Regional Administrator to
defer LRT Segment H completion (from
Nicollet Mall Station to the Entertainment
District Station) to the Phase 113 revenue
startup date of December 31, 2004.
• amended the 2001 -2004 Transportation
Improvement Program by including the
following three projects:
Page 5 April, 2001
1. Grand Rounds Scenic Byway
CSAH 37 - Renovation of Shepard
Road Mississippi River Overlook
3. Rail Safety Project SP 82 -00131
amended the 2001 -2004 Transportation
Improvement Program by revising the
federal and local match dollar amounts,
revising the project descriptions of eight
projects which support the Council's livable
community goals and deleting the set aside
amounts.
• amended the 2001 -2004 Transportation
Improvement Program by adding the
Section 5307 Metro Mobility ADA
Operations and Bus Purchases.
• authorized its Regional Administrator to
amend a consulting services contract
agreement with Eckert Seamans Cherin &
Mellot, LLC, for an amount not to exceed
$14,500.
• authorized its Regional Administrator to
formally adopt LRT Station Names; and,
when appropriate, present for Council
consideration future recommendations for
Station Name changes, as allowed by
legislation.
Metropolitan
Metropolitan Airports Commission
Metropolitan Airports Commission offices are located at
6040 28th Av. S., Minneapolis, MN 55450. For more
information, call Lynn Sorensen at (612) 726 -8186.
The Commission:
/T
DluES,
approved an appointment to the
Transportation Accessibility Advisory
Committee (TAAC).
The Council Also:
• : approved a resolution recognizing the
contributions of Fred Perez as the Council's
District 13 representative.
received a presentation on comprehensive
plan status and outcomes.
received a briefing on the Smart Growth
Twin Cities Project status and an update on
the opportunity sites and regional scenarios.
New Publications
Council publications are available from the
Council's Regional Data Center. For a free
and complete list of publications, write the
Metropolitan Council Data Center, 230 E. Fifth
St., St. Paul, MN 55101, or call (651) 602 -1140.
E -mail address is: data.center @metc.state.mn.us
There is a charge for some publications.
The bimonthly Council Directions newsletter
provides information on regional issues and
Council Programs. If you wish to subscribe to
Council Directions at no charge, call Dawn
Hoffner at (651) 602 -1447.
Commission Activities
scheduling of common use gates, safety
issues, ramp procedures, aircraft parking
and other operational issues at the Hubert
Humphrey Terminal.
• adopted the Humphrey Terminal Operating
Policies and Procedures which govern the
• approved establishment of a new rate for the
EconoLot parking facility and $10 -per- day
maximum rate and established valet parking
rates at the Humphrey Terminal at $4 for the
Page 6 April, 2001
�1 . 'T
DIGE,S
first hour, $1 for each additional hour, with
a $12 daily maximum, effective May 1,
2001.
ratified a lease agreement with Champion
Air for a gate and associated space at the
Humphrey Terminal.
approved a concession agreement with
Concourse Communications Group LLC, to
provide wireless telecommunication
management services through the Airports
Commission facilities.
Metropolitan Parks & Open Space
Commission (MP &OSQ
Metropolitan Parks & Open Space Commission offices are
located at Mears Park Centre, 230 E. Fifth St., St. Paul,
55101. For more information, call Sandi Dingle at (651)
602 -1312.
The Commission:
recommended that the Metropolitan Council
consider a $299,000 reimbursement to
Washington County for acquiring land in
Big Marine Park Reserve in the year 2000 in
a future regional parks capital improvement
program.
recommended that the Metropolitan Council
consider a reimbursement of up to
$1,540,000 to Hennepin Parks for
redeveloping the Elm Creek Park Reserve
swim pond initially funded with Grant SG-
98-52 in a future regional parks capital
improvement program.
Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission
(MSFQ
Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission offices are
located at 900 South 5th St., Minneapolis, MN 55415. For
more information, call Nancy Matowitz at (612) 335 -3310.
In March the Commission:
Page 7
• approved plans and specifications for the
2001 Video Board Replacement Project.
• approved up to $250,000 to provide for a
portion of colonnade seating and ancillary
costs for the NCAA Final Four.
In April the Commission:
approved the bid and awarded the contract
for the 2001 Video Board Replacement
Project for the base bid and voluntary
alternate number one to Daktronics, Inc., in
the amount of $2,285,224.
April, 2001
Darlene Wallin
From: Thomas Chochrek [thomas.chochrek @prudential.com]
ant: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 10:59 AM
o: tbrinkman @uccmn.com; JDlondbury@aol.com; rward @mjsk.com; Ipresthus @mn.rr.com;
Dmaetzold @ci.edina.mn.us
Subject: Here's why it'll be difficult to get a YES vote from Londonderry Drive
Candy, Ted, Joan, Richard, Linda & Dennis:
Our home sits on a street in Edina -- Londonderry Drive -- just a block away
from Walnut Ridge Park. We are
relegated to having to petition for acceptance into the Edina Public Schools
(which would receive the most significant
share of improvements with a YES vote, $26.5 million of the $35.8 million bond
issue).
Since our infant son was born in the boom birth year of 2000, it might be
doubtful that a petition for entry would be
honored at the school of our choice, yet you'll still gladly raise my tax costs
more than $150 per year for 20 years!
Our requests to a variety of city council authorities and state legislators to
right this wrong have been fruitless.
I am urging all of the residents on my street to vote NO.
our website's Frequently Asked Questions section states:
Q.) How does the referendum affect residents of Edina who live in the Richfield
or Hopkins School Districts?
A.) This is a City of Edina referendum. All residents of the City of Edina will
have access to these facilities.
This is a city park and recreational tax, not a school tax.
Well, if 76 percent of the improvements will be made on school property that my
child can play in but possibly not
receive an education in — we'll have to vote NO.
You've earmarked $117,000 for pathway, tennis court and wheelchair accessible
playground roadway at Walnut Ridge.
If your bond issue passes, our neighborhood will be paying for every dime of
improvement -- and for your artificial turf at
the high school stadium too!
Tom Chochrek
7606 Edinborough Way #6111
Edina, MN 55435
May 1, 2001
City of Edina
City Hall
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Mn. 55424
Attn: Dennis Maetzold
Mayor
DEar Mayor Maetzold:
We live at Village Homes of Edinborough located at 76th Street
and Edinborough Way.
It is our understanding there is going to be a traffic signal
installed at this intersection. This is badly needed as the
traffic has increased and it is almost impossible at times to
get across the street by car.and /or foot. There are a lot of
Senior Citizens living in this area who like to walk to Centennial
Lakes and people just don't slow down. I'm afraid someone is
going to get seriously injured or killed someday if something is
not done soon.
We have called Fran Hoffman several times inquiring about this
and have not received any response.
Please advise status of this.
Sincerely
K,
Cecelia Mahoney "_ 4_
Kathleen Mahoney
I,J4 7T 0/0 t4l jet
- Porth�n-
�(r.P.�nZ�S
-r ToAo I
i
i
MEMORANDUM
Date: April 30, 2001
To: Todd Porthan, Paramedic
Mike Gorshe, Paramedic
From Darrell Todd, Assistant Fire Chief
RE: April 28, 2001 EMS call at St. Patrick's Church
I received a call today from Ivir. Lundquist regarding a call at St. Patrick's Church on
Saturday April 28, 2001.
Mr. Lundquist called in to praise you on the professional and caring way you took care of his
wife following her syncopal episode. He said you did a "great job" and had nothing but good
things to say about you both
It's always nice to receive this type of phone call. Congratulations on a great job.
Copy:
Marty Scheerer, Fire Chief
Joel Forseth, Captain
. , rJ r , r,
JV
T
i
May 7, 2001
Mr. Gordon Hughes
Edina City Manager
4801 West 50" Street
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Gordon,
�1
So often people write letters when things go wrong but fail to compliment when things go
well. I had an incident with my car today and I was extremely pleased with the help I received
from an Edina Police Officer.
I drive a 1970 Volkswagen bug during the summer months. The shift lever came
"unglued" as I was turning off of 5dh by the Edina Library. I could not get the car in gear so I just
pushed it forward in the median and had to head for home. I went to my service station, they
ordered a tow truck and when I retuned to the car Officer Tom McKenzie, badge number 138,
was there with his lights flashing and protecting it even though it was out of harms way.
Officer McKenzie was so polite, helpful, and courteous to me. I explained that I was on
my way to an appointment at 9:00 and he said to go on and go as I was already late and that he
would remain until the tow truck came. I returned shortly after 10:00 and the car was just being
taken away. I spoke again with Officer McKenzie and even though it was about an hour from the
time I first saw him, his demeanor was still polite, calm, and he had a smile on his face. He is a
genuine asset to the Edina Police Department.
Thanks for all the work that the Edina Police do for our city and a special word of thanks
to Tom McKenzie for his service to me.
Sin ly,
Rich Osborn
Co'-vc' 1 �-
May 1, 2001
Mr. Michael Siitari
Chief of Police
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424 -1394
Re: Evelyn Mushitz investigation
Dear Chief Siitari:
On behalf of MidAmerican Energy Holdings Company, please accept our grateful
appreciation for the tireless efforts of Detectives Eric Kleinberg, Ronald Riegert and the
Edina Police Department.
From the beginning of this investigation Detectives Kleinberg and Riegert displayed the
highest degree of professionalism and worked swiftly to apprehend the person believed to
be responsible for diverting over $2m in company funds from Edina Realty.
Through their excellent investigative efforts, other federal law enforcement authori ties
became acquainted with the magnitude of this criminal activity and correctly entered the
investigation to explore the criminal violations under the Federal Code.
None of this would have been possible were it not for these detectives taking the
aggressive initiative to see justice prevail.
It is our desire that these detectives be so recognized as well as the many other officers
who provided valuable assistance throughout this investigation.
Since
Russell H. White
Vice President
cc: Detective Eric Kleinberg
Detective Ron Riegert
MIDAMERICAN ENERGY HOLDINGS COMPANY
666 GRAND AVENUE • P.O. BOX 657 • DES MOINES, IOWA 50303 -0657 • 515.242 -4000 • FAX: 515. 242.4031