Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001-06-19_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL JUNE 19, 2001 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Commissioner, Council Member or citizen so requests it In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the Agenda. * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA - Regular Meeting of June 5, 2001 II. AWARD OF BID - Grandview Square Project III. CONFIRMATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS - As per Pre -List dated 6/14/01 TOTAL: $24,114.69. IV. ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION - RESOLUTION OF COMMENDATION - SYLVESTER SCHWARTZ * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of June 5, 2001 19. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS - Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Planner Public Comment heard. Motion to close hearing. Zoning Ordinances: First and Second Reading require 4/5 favorable rollcall of all members of Council to pass. Waiver of Second Readine: 4/5 favorable rollcall of all members of Council to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. Conditional Use Permit: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. Rollcall A. FINAL REZONING -- Nona Construction Company, 5400 France Avenue Rollcall B. FINAL REZONING, FINAL PLAT, AND AMENDMENT TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN -- JMS Development and Thorpe Real Estate, 6512 Vernon Avenue " -11call C. DEMOLITION PERMIT MORATORIUM - Country Club District Roll Call D. ORDINANCE NO. 2001 -03 AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE - ALLOWING CURRENCY EXCHANGE IN CERTAIN ZONING DISTRICTS Roll Call E. VARIANCE APPEAL - 4309 Brandon Street Agenda /Edina City Council June 19, 2001 Page 2 III. AWARD OF. BID * A. Sound Abatement Improvement Projects SA -1 & SA -2, Contract 01- 06(EN) * B. Nature Pathway Braemar Pedestrian Trail, Contract No. 00 -3(PK) * C. Pump Renovation Well #9, Contract 01- 02(PN) * D. Roof Repair & Replacement Water Treatment. Plant #4, Contract 01- 03(PW) * E. Insurance Renewal, Property * F. Insurance Renewal, General Liability, Equipment, Liquor, & Pollution G. Insurance Renewal, Workers' Compensation IV. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS * A. Traffic Safety Report of June 6, 2 001 B. Joint Powers and Ground Lease Agreement, Southwest Metro Public Safety Training Center C. Senior Neighborhood Coordinator - Edina Human Relations Commission V. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS VI. CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS A. Laurie McNamara, Edina Citizens Opposed to Commuter Rail VII. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES VIII. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL DC. MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEM X. FINANCE * A. CONFIRMATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS. - As per Pre -List dated 6/7/01 Total $434,550.97 and per Pre -List dated 6/14/01 TOTAL $1,067,278.14. B. RECEIVE COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT (CAFR) for Year Ending December 31, 2000. Wed Jul4 Tues Jul 17 Tues Aug 7 Tues Aug 21 Mon Sep 3 Tues Sep 4 Wed Sep 19 INDEPENDENCE DAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. LABOR DAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBER' COUNCIL CHAMBEF COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS EDINA CRIME PREVENTION FUND Box 390231, Edina, Minnesota 55439 -0231 RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT FOR POLICE AND FIRE TRAINING CENTER WHEREAS, the Edina Crime Prevention Fund was formed 31 years ago to assist in criminal apprehension, and WHEREAS, 12 years ago the Edina Crime Prevention Fund started financially supporting the cities Crime Prevention Coordinator, and WHEREAS, the Edina Crime Prevention Fund has become even more aware of the needs of Edina Police Department due to the recent unfortunate circumstance, and WHEREAS, the culmination of these makes the Edina Crime Prevention Fund Board members very attuned to the need of constant training and education of its police officers, and WHEREAS, members of the Crime Prevention Fund Board are also aware of the need to train its Fire and Paramedic personnel, and WHEREAS, the City of Edina will realize a million dollar savings in original costs and substantial savings in annual training costs, and WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota has also recognized the need for training public safety personnel with financial support, and WHEREAS the new training facility can continue the original park mission of the Wipperman Gun Range to offer youth gun safety training, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT BE RESOLVED, that the Edina Crime Prevention Fund Board wholeheartedly encourage the City Council to move forward on the joint efforts of Edina, Bloomington, Eden Prairie, and Metropolitan Airport Commission to construct a Police and Fire Training Facility at Braemar. The motion was made to adopt the above resolution and was unanimously approved by the Edina Crime Prevention Board at its meeting of June 15, 2001. MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY HELD AT CITY HALL JUNE 5, 2001 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica and Chair Maetzold. CONSENT AGENDA APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Kelly and seconded by Commissioner Hovland for approval of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Consent Agenda as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF May 15, 2001, APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Kelly and seconded by Commissioner Hovland approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority for May 15, 2001. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. BIDS AWARDED FOR GRANDVIEW SENIOR CENTER/LIBRARY BUILDING (01 -5) Director Hughes presented sixteen bid packages for the construction of the Library/Senior Center. The bids came in under budget allowing the addition of enhancements back into the building. All sixteen bids are recommended low bids and have been analyzed by OPUS Corporation and are acceptable. Each bid had multiple bidders and the sixteen being presented are the low bidders. Mr. Hughes said there are seven additional packages that are being analyzed by OPUS and all seven were also under - budget. He recommended the bid be awarded for $2,099,272.42 to the sixteen low- bidders. Commissioner Housh asked if OPUS is the general contractor on the project are they allowed to bid. Director Hughes said OPUS is allowed to bid. They act as construction manager plus having to guarantee a maximum price for the building. In this manner, they are allowed to bid in order to protect the price of the building. Commissioner Masica asked what enhancements might be added back in to the building plans. Director Hughes answered that enhancements could be an upgrade of carpeting, window treatments, interior windows, or better kitchen equipment, etc. He added the projected amount because of being under budget could be as much as $180,000.00. Commissioner Hovland made a motion approving the award of bid for the Senior Center /Library Building as follows: DESCRIPTION LOW BIDDER BID 1 Concrete OPUS NW Const. $349,000.00 2 Masonry OPUS NW Const. $390,600.00 3 Glass And Glazing Brin NW Glass $210,400.00 4 Roofing BL Dalsin Roofing $127,500.00 5 Finish Grading OPUS NW Const. $56,300.00 6 Elevator Schindler Elevator $32,075.00 7 Fire Sprinkler National Fire Sprinkler $42,000.00 8 Bituminous Paving Bituminous Roadways $29,933.00 9 Landscape North Metro Landscape $77,635.42 10 Drywall OPUS NW Const. $324,800.00 11 Carpentry OPUS NW Const. $204,900.00 12 H.M. Doors /Hardware Gardner Hardware $26,758.00 13 Acoustical Ceiling T.C. Acoustical Ceilings $54,250.00 14 Carpet St. Paul Linoleum $104,401.00 15 Painting Rainbow Inc. $28,780.00 16 Tile Flooring T.C. Tile and Marble $39,940.00 TOTAL $2,099,272.42 Commissioner Housh seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold Motion carried. *CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Motion made by Commissioner Kelly and seconded by Commissioner Hovland approving the payment of claims dated May 23, 2001, and consisting of one page totaling $129,349.85; and for confirmation of claims dated May 30, 2001, and consisting of one page totaling $2,614.50. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. There being no further business on the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Agenda, Chair Maetzold declared the meeting adjourned at 7:10 P.M. Executive Director { TO: FROM: VIA: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: 19 June 2001 AGENDA ITEM II. -HRA ITEM DESCRIPTION: Senior Center /Library Building Bids Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. 1. 2. 2. 3. See Attached Tabulation 3. 4. 5. 6. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: See Attached Tabulation (Award $ To Those Listed) GENERAL INFORMATION: This set of bids is for the construction of the Library/Senior Center. The HRA has approved 18 earlier bids for this building. Two additional bids will be taken to complete the public bidding process for this site. Five bid packages are being awarded at this time. This total bid is $802,093.00. The Engineer's estimate is $989,900.00. The funds for this project are HRA funds. SignatiAre The Recommended Bid is within budget Public Works - HRA not within budget 2,S F Hughes, Departrrtent n Wallin, Finance Director Manager HOL JG AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY CONTRA J1 -5 (HRA) BID TABULATION HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IMPROVEMENT 01 -5 (HRA) CONTRACT 01- 5(HRA) BID OPENING 5124/01 11:00 A.M. SENIOR CENTER/LIBRARY - GRANDVIEW BID PKG NUMBER JITEM DESCRIPTION ILOW BID R ENGINEER'S EST I BID + ALTERNATES 5 Miscellaneous Metals Superior Iron 27,300.00 17,958.00 11 Plumbing G.R. Mechanical 137,700.00 172,000.00 12 HVAC R & S Heating 433,300.00 396,000.00 14 Electrical Mayer Electric 371,000.00 200,935.00 19 Overhead Doors Twin City Garage 20,600.00 15,200.00 $ 989,900.00 $ 802,093.00 Page 1 R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Vendor 13661 6/14/01 101111 CAHNERS 104.32 115.73 104.32 440.10 13662 6/14/01 100730 DORSEY 8 WHITNEY LLP 1,996.45 LEGAL FEES 1,996.45 13663 6/14/01 101930 THOMAS & SONS CONSTRUCTION INC 20,731.95 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 10 20,731.95 13664 6/14/01 101930 THOMAS & SONS CONSTRUCTION INC 946.19 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 13 946.19 24,114.69 Grand Total Account No Account Description 9137.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 9137.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 9137.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 9137.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 6/14/01 9:27:25 Page - 1 Business Unit HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE SUBDI: HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE SUBDI: HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE SUBDI: HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE SUBDI; 20471 874087 9134.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL GRANDVIEW TAX DISTRICT 20476 061501 9132.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS CENTENNIAL LAKE TAX DISTRICT 20477 06/15 Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 24,114.69 Total Payments 24,114.69 9132.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS CENTENNIAL LAKE TAX DISTRICT CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/14/01 — 6/14/01 Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No AD FOR BID 20472 1736875 AD FOR BID 20473 1736874 AD FOR BID 20474 1746401 AD FOR BID 20475 1746400 440.10 13662 6/14/01 100730 DORSEY 8 WHITNEY LLP 1,996.45 LEGAL FEES 1,996.45 13663 6/14/01 101930 THOMAS & SONS CONSTRUCTION INC 20,731.95 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 10 20,731.95 13664 6/14/01 101930 THOMAS & SONS CONSTRUCTION INC 946.19 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 13 946.19 24,114.69 Grand Total Account No Account Description 9137.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 9137.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 9137.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 9137.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 6/14/01 9:27:25 Page - 1 Business Unit HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE SUBDI: HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE SUBDI: HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE SUBDI: HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE SUBDI; 20471 874087 9134.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL GRANDVIEW TAX DISTRICT 20476 061501 9132.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS CENTENNIAL LAKE TAX DISTRICT 20477 06/15 Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 24,114.69 Total Payments 24,114.69 9132.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS CENTENNIAL LAKE TAX DISTRICT R55CKSUM LOG20000 Company Amount 09000 HRA FUND 24,114.69 Report Totals 24,114.69 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Summary 6114/01 - 6114/01 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing. polities and procedures Fina City Nfanager la�/ 6/14/01 9:36:14 Page- 1 O Pi tit Cn O \NC�RPORP'T�Q� ,866 RES OL UTION OF APPRECIATION WHEREAS, Sylvester Schwartz has served on the Edina Police Department for thirty years since January 18,1971; and WHEREAS, Sylvester Schwartz began as a patrol officer; has progressed up the Department Ranks to Juvenile Investigator, Detective, Sergeant, Lieutenant, and currently serves as Edina Deputy Police Chief; and WHEREAS, Sylvester Schwartz has exemplified all the characteristics of peace officers who "Protect and Serve'; and WHEREAS, Sylvester Schwartz will on June 29, 2001, retire from the Edina Police Department; and WHEREAS, through these thirty plus years of public service Sylvester Schwartz has demonstrated his care and concern for the public welfare of his fellow citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council, City staff and all Edina residents hereby express their thanks and appreciation to SYLVESTER SCHWARTZ for his tireless efforts and sincere dedication in making the Edina community an outstanding place to live. Passed and adopted this 1901 day of June 2001. Mayor MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JUNE 5,2001 - 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica and Mayor Maetzold. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Kelly and seconded by Member Hovland approving the Council Consent Agenda as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 2001 -37 COMMENDING VALLEY VIEW MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS Mayor Maetzold explained that sixth -grade students at Valley View Middle School have instituted a plastic bottle collection program thereby diverting a recyclable resource from landfills. Their efforts resulted in the collection of a cart of bottles daily. Member Masica introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:, RESOLUTION NO. 2001-37 WHEREAS, the sixth grades at Valley View Middle School observed that plastic drink bottles were being thrown into the garbage and not recycled; and WHEREAS, the students instituted a plastic bottle collection in a specially designed container, and WHEREAS, the sixth grade students volunteered and monitored the collection of the plastic bottles for recycling during the lunch hour, and WHEREAS, the efforts of the sixth grade students resulted in a cart of plastic bottles being collected daily; and WHEREAS, the Edina Recycling and Solid Waste Commission requested the City Council recognize the endeavors of the Valley View Middle School Sixth Grade Class. NOW,. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Edina hereby commends the Valley View Middle School Sixth Grade for their diligence in preserving our resources by undertaking this recycling project which diverts a recyclable resource from landfills. Adopted this 5th day of June 2001. Member Housh seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 15, 2001, APPROVED Motion made by Member Kelly and . seconded by. Member .Hovland approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of May 15, 2001. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. RESOLUTION 200141, VACATION APPROVED FOR EASEMENT AT EDEN CIRCLE Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Page 1 Minutes/Edina City Council/lune 5, 2001 Engineer Hoffman explained that the re- development in Grandview Square requires the vacation of the Eden Circle public right -of -way. Mr. Hoffman noted that Xcel Energy, Reliant Energy, time Warner and Qwest did not have objections to the vacation of Eden Circle. He added that the easement should be allowed with the requirement that new access be provided to the City well located in the re- configured Sherwood Park. Member Masica asked how the well was currently accessed. Mr. Hoffman replied that currently there was an asphalt driveway which will be removed and replaced with a geo -grid driveway that will be covered with sod. Member Housh made a motion to close the public hearing. Member Masica seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold Motion carried. Member Housh introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 200141 RESOLUTION APPROVING VACATION OF EDEN CIRCLE PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY WHEREAS, a motion of the City Council, on the 18th day of April, 2001, fixed a date for a public hearing on a proposed vacation of the Eden Circle public right -of -way; and WHEREAS, two weeks published and posted notice of said hearing was given and the hearing was held on June 5, 2001, at which time all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; and WHEREAS, the Council deems it to be in the best interest of the City and of the public that said vacation be made; and WHEREAS, the Council considered the extent the vacation affects existing easements within the area of the vacation and the extent to which the vacation affects the authority of any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling electric, telephone or cable television poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or water pipes, mains, and hydrants on or under the area of the proposed vacation to continue maintaining the same, or to enter upon such easement area or portion thereof vacated to maintain, repair, replace, remove or otherwise attend thereto; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota, that the following described Eden Circle public right -of- way easement is hereby vacated effective as of June 5,2001: A 50 -foot right -of -way, the centerline of which is described as follows: "Commencing at a point on the Easterly line of Sherwood Road, said point being 25 -feet South of the Southwest corner of Lot 3, Block 1, Edenmoor Addition; thence Easterly parallel to and 25 feet Southerly. of the South line of said Lot 3 a distance of 80 feet to a point of curve to the right, having a radius of 70 feet and a central angle of 90 degrees; thence along the arc of said curve to the right a distance of 109.96 feet to the end of said curve; thence South and tangent to the last described curve a distance of 12.51 feet to a point of curve to the left having a radius of 70 feet and a central angle of 90 degrees; thence along the arc of said curve a distance of 109.96 feet to the end of said curve; thence Easterly to a point on the Easterly line of Edenmoor Page 2 Minutes/Edina City Council/iune 5, 2001 Addition, said point being 177.51 feet South of the Southeast corner of Lot 1, Block 1, Edenmoor Addition, said point being the termination point of the roadway." BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said vacation does not affect, and there are continued, reserved, and retained, by the said resolution ordering the vacation, the following existing easements and authority in, on and under the above vacated area: The authority of Xcel Energy Company, Qwest Communications, Time Warner Cable Minnesota, or Reliant Energy to enter upon the above vacated area for the maintenance, replacement, repair and removal of and for otherwise attending to, underground conduit, manholes, cables, wires and poles required for utility service now in, on or under the above vacated area. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk is authorized and directed to cause a notice of completion of proceedings to be prepared, entered in the transfer record of the County Auditor, and filed with the County Recorder, in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section. 412.851. Passed and adopted this 5th day of June, 2001. Member Kelly seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold Motion carried. ALLEY EXTENSION DENIED FOR IMPROVEMENT NO. A -103, ALLEY EXTENSION BETWEEN MINNEHAHA BOULEVARD AND HALIFAX AVENUE Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Staff Presentation Assistant City Engineer Houle briefly reviewed the recommended proceedings for improvements undertaken via Minn. Stat. 429. He explained the City had received a petition from five of seven residents requesting an alley improvement in the 5200 block between Halifax Avenue and Minnehaha Boulevard. The Council received the feasibility study and set the public hearing at their May 17, 2001, meeting. Mr. Houle explained that the proposed improvement would consist of adding a bituminous paved extension of an existing alley that accessed West 52nd Street. The petition requested that. the addition be graded and graveled only. However, Public Works Department policy is that all public alley improvements be either concrete or bituminous pavement. Mr. Houle said the existing paved alley is bituminous. If constructed the alley would be twelve feet wide, need minimal grading; and consist of three inches of pavement over eight inches of aggregate base. He estimated the project cost.at $15,000 and said if ordered the project would be funded through special assessments of the benefited property owners of approximately $2,200 each. The length of the assessment would be ten years. If the improvement is moved forward the following schedule would be followed: Bid Opening, July 2001; Award Contract July 2001; Construct Alley, August 2001; and finally adopt special assessments, fall of 2001. Mr. Houle added that 43 percent of the affected residents signed the original petition. He has heard from five of the residents expressing concern regarding the project. Minnehaha Boulevard residents said: they do not want additional traffic behind their home; 'a resident wanted to see the alley extended to West 54th Street, a resident did not want to see any improvements to the alley; and one resident who was out of town asked the hearing be continued until he arrived home. Halifax Avenue residents have stated the area is a public Page 3 Minutes/Edina City CouncilAune 5, 2001 right -of -way; they should have the right to use the alley; and they would like to build a garage with alley access. Mr. Houle noted that a letter from Mr. Orrin Broberg had been faxed to the City on June 4, 2001, opposing and alley improvement, and asking that his name be withdrawn from the previously signed petition. Public Comment Steve Domke, 5236 Halifax Avenue, stated he has a one -car garage. Mr. Domke said parking in winter was an issue because of winter parking rules. Mr. Domke would like to build a garage that could be accessed from the alley. He added he has attempted to reach Duncan McCampbell who has verbally said he favored the alley, but has not received any written confirmation to date. Mr. Domke said when he purchased his home he checked to see if the alley behind the home was a legal alley. Mr: Domke said that the vegetation that has been cleared behind the homes was done by NSP after the storm three years ago. Member Hovland asked how often Mr. Domke used the alley. Mr. Domke explained he used the alley daily and had been doing for a little over two years. He added he has a jeep and was able to drive over the snow, etc. Alice Mortenson, 5233 Minnehaha Boulevard, said she checked with the City 36 years ago when she purchased her home. Ms. Mortenson stated she was told the alley would only be developed if all the residents agreed to it. She said the alley was used by children to walk to the park. Ms. Mortenson said she did not feel the alley should be improved. Someone who wanted the alley improved has removed bushes and applied chemicals to the vegetation. This was a concern because the residents on Minnehaha Boulevard who have wells. Member Hovland asked how far the backs of the homes were from the alley and if fences exist. Ms. Mortenson replied the homes are between 35 and 40 feet from the alley and some residents have fences, but not all of them. Member Housh asked if the houses were not currently served by City water, where would the lines run if installed in the future. Mr. Houle said the location of future water lines would be determined by the location of the existing wells. Max Hintz, 5241 Minnehaha Boulevard, stated he was very opposed to the petitioned alley improvement. It would change the character of the neighborhood. He added the use by some residents had already changed the neighborhood's character. Mr. Hintz said the vegetation growing in the alleyway was part of the reason he purchased his house. He said he did not want the alley improved because of safety, aesthetics, and because he believed it will be detrimental to house values. Mr. Hintz noted that all the Minnehaha residents were opposed to the alley improvement. He said that he believed the wells were all located in the back yards and asked why an improvement would be done for the convenience of a few. Mr. Hintz asked if the alley was still a valid right -of -way since it had not been used. Attorney Gilligan explained an alley right -of -way is not abandoned or vacated by non -use. The alley in question would still be right -of -way. Laurie Buck Brown, 5240 Halifax Avenue, stated she supported the petition. She explained that her home is a Cape Code with a single car garage. They have two cars and a long narrow driveway. The only option they would have of expanding their garage would be Page 4 Minutes/Edina City Council /tune 5, 2001 through the alley. She asked approval of the improvement allowing her the luxury of choosing to improve her garage. Mike Brown, 5240 Halifax Avenue, added his support of the alley improvement. Virginia Broberg, 5229 Minnehaha Boulevard stated she did not support the alley. Mrs. Broberg said there would be no benefit to the resident along Minnehaha Boulevard. Phil Enger, 5301 Minnehaha Boulevard, stated his house was a double lot directly south of the petition area. Mr. Enger said he did not want the aesthetics changed in the existing alley. Member Hovland made a motion, seconded by Member Masica to close the public hearing. Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold Motion carried. Member Masica acknowledged the issue was difficult because the residents were divided almost equally in favor and against the improvement. She said she would be inclined to allow the petitioners to prevail and go ahead with the improvement. Member Housh disagreed, stating that the residents had not brought any consensus to the Council. He added the homeowners purchased their home in the existing conditions. Member Housh stated he would not support the proposed improvement to the alley. Member Hovland said he agreed that the issue was difficult because it affects all the residents. However, he added he could not see any benefit to the residents along Minnehaha Boulevard. The petitioners did not have neighborhood consensus either which made him unable to support the proposed improvement. Mayor Maetzold agreed with Members Hovland and Housh, and stated he did not want to assess residents for an improvement with no benefit to their properties. He added that an alley improvement was more different than a sidewalk, which might be improved because of safety concerns. Member Hovland asked about potentially vacating the alley. Mr. Hughes stated vacations of public easements and right -of -way was usually done by petition. Member Kelly made a motion to reject the petition and not improve the alley. Member Housh seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold Motion carried. RESOLUTION 2001 -45 ADOPTED ORDERING SOUND ABATEMENT IMPROVEMENT NO. SA -1 T.H. 169 EAST SIDE - BRENDAN GLENN PLAT AND SOUND ABATEMENT IMPROVEMENT NO. SA -2, T.H. 169 ADJACENT TO INDIAN WAY WEST Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Staff Presentation Page 5 Minutes/Edina City CouncMune 5, 2001 Engineer Hoffman noted the City Council had a public hearing on the proposed project SA -1 consisting of 690 feet of sound abatement wall installed on along T.H. 169 just north of Brendan Glenn. That hearing was continued to June 5, 2001 to allow the petitioners on Indian Way West inclusion in the construction project. On May 15, 2001, the City Council authorized taking bids and preparing a special assessment roll for both projects. Mr. Hoffman said the sound abatement wall would be a structure ten feet high made of concrete. He showed a graphic depicting the stone columns in such a wall and explained that the stone columns were bid as an alternative. Mr. Hoffman explained the desired action would be to order the improvement and adopt the assessment roll at the same time. This would allow any objections to be discovered before construction. Mr. Hoffman reported the bids came in slighter higher than originally anticipated because of the requirement for caulking to be done to enhance the sound reduction. The project without the alternative stone columns is approximately $125,000.00 The stone columns would be $2,000,00 each as an add -on to the project. It is anticipated that 15 or 16 columns would be needed spaced at 100 -foot intervals to. span the entire project area including the Brendan Glenn area. Mr. Hoffman said the neighborhood's initial reaction to the stone columns was mixed. He said the residents would like to see the City contribute to this addition in some way. Member Hovland said he personally felt the aesthetic value of the columns quite high and would like to see if this could be viewed as a model for the rest of the community. Member Hovland commented the neighbors have done quite a bit on their own, but who would pay for the columns was still an open issue with him. Member Housh asked if any legislation funding sound walls had moved forward. Mr. Hoffman replied that he to his knowledge nothing had been enacted and furthermore, it would not be an issue dealt with during the special session. Member Housh asked how much sound abatement would be achieved with a ten foot wall height. Mr. Hoffman answered that building a wall higher than ten feet was felt to be cost prohibitive for the neighbors. The ten -foot height provides adequate sound abatement coverage for automobile traffic, but will not cover truck traffic. Member Masica commented she liked the look of the columns and felt the City should consider funding their construction as the city's participation in the project. Public Comment Jean Wangard, 6804 Indian Hills Road, explained that three years ago she and her neighbors got together a petition then went to the State and came to the City. This triggered a study of the issue, after which the neighbors realized that it would take too long to wait for any state aid and that the City did not have the funds to construct sound walls. Therefore, residents decided they would be willing to pay for construction of the proposed wall and worked with the Engineering Department to develop the petition. The neighbors brought a consensus from 15 of the 18 property owners (one owner owns both sides of a twin home) to the City requesting the project go forward and proposing a funding formula. Mrs. Wangard reported that only one resident declined to sign the petition. Mrs. Wangard thanked Fran Hoffman for Page 6 Minutes/Edina City CouncMune 5, 2001 his work on this matter and urged the Council to order the improvement. She expressed concern that controversy over the stone columns could stall the construction. Mr. Wangard stated she belief that the residents were at their limit for financial commitment and could not afford the columns. Peter Petersen, 6815 Indian Hill Road, stated he supports the construction of the sound walls, but felt the City should pay for the columns if it was decided they needed to be included in the project. Tom Crouch, 6740 Indian Way West, said he supported the wall; and he and his neighbors were willing to pay for the wall's installation, but not for the columns. Mr. Crouch explained that they had already installed a fence five years ago, then landscaped their cul de sac, and pond so paying for the columns would be too much. Tom Aldrich, 6444 Aldrich Lane, said he favor the construction and asked that the project be ordered. Emily Buchwald, 6808 Margarets Lane, explained she was a 34 -year resident and has seen the traffic increase steadily. The increased traffic has affected her property values and the proposed concrete wall seems a good way to address this issue. Sue Seckinger, 4912 Sunnyside Road, stated this was not the only sound abatement issue in Edina. Ms. Seckinger said that if this wall were setting the standard for the community care should be taken. She noted that the cement wall project before the Council works for the neighborhood, but cautioned that other areas may proposed a twenty -foot wooden frame fence. Ms. Seckinger asked what would define a majority, who would determine funding levels. Mayor Maetzold acknowledged Ms. Seckinger's concerns. He explained the project currently before the Council had been petitioned for by the neighbors and that the neighbors had presented a funding formula they agreed to before coming to the City. Sheila Hipp, 6442 Margarets Lane, added her support to the project. Ms. Hipp noted the steady increase in traffic over the last eight years have added noise and dirt to the area. Dick Wald, 6440 Margarets Lane, stated that is his opinion the standard for the fence had already been set when the Council approved the design submitted by the developer of Brendan Glenn. He urged Council approve the project. Jean Wangard, 6804 Indian Hills Road, stated the issue should not be the style of the fence, rather just building the fence. She said the home at 6800 Indian Hills Road was up for sale, but buyers were waiting to see if the wall would be constructed. Tom, Doherty, 4911 Sunnyside Road, noted that Edina was already very dissected by the various highways. He felt that he and his neighbors were realistic in the money they were willing to spend and were just waiting for a decision from the Council. Jean Wangard, 6804 Indian Hills Road stated that her neighborhood was following the directions given by the Council three years ago when they were told that if they wanted Page 7 Minutes/Edina Ci!y Council/iune 5, 2001 sound abatement, they should figure out a funding formula and petition the City. Ms. Wangard urged approval of the sound abatement projects. Member of Member Hovland, seconded by Member Kelly to close the public hearing. Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold Council Discussion Mayor Maetzold asked if the projects could be built with the City paying for the stone columns. Mr. Hoffman said the Council could decide what part of any improvement they would fund. He added that at this point he would recommend the Council order the improvement, but wait until July 17, 2001 to adopt any assessment roll. This would allow final costs to be known and the necessary waivers from the residents to be filed with the City. Member Housh asked if the developer's portion of the wall was already built and if so, could the columns be added. Mr. Hoffman noted that the developer of Brendan Glenn had been the first one to be required to build a sound abatement wall. He said that the columns could be added after the initial walls were built. Member Hovland said he believed that many neighborhoods were working this same issue. He commended Ms. Wangard's neighborhood for their work in bringing the current project to the Council. He said he believed the standard had been set when the City Engineer suggested a particular design. Member Hovland said he would not want to see twenty -foot wooden walls, and that he would support the City funding the construction of the stone columns for the entire project. Member Masica agreed the City should pay for the columns in this project. However, she did not agree that by ordering this project no other designs could be considered. Member Masica stated that in her opinion each area should be reviewed and a decision made based upon what would be best suited to the area. Member Housh said he agreed that each area should be reviewed independently of. the others from a design standpoint. He added that for this project he was not convinced that the columns were necessary. He added he was agreeable to the concrete walls without the pillars as per the neighbors' consensus. Member Kelly stated he agreed with Member Housh on the columns. He said that to other residents who were looking for direction for their neighborhoods he offered the following: 1) more property owners that would be assessed by the project should support the project than not support the project; 2) a formula for equitable funding of the projects from the neighborhood should be presented. Member Kelly added that he would also favor looking at potential designs on a case by case basis to ascertain what would best suit each neighborhood. Member Kelly.commended the neighbors for their work. Mayor Maetzold agreed with Member Kelly that each area should be viewed individually, but he added that he supported Members Hovland and Masica desire to build the wall with the stone columns to be paid for by the City. Page 8 Minutes/Edina City Council/Tune 5, 2001 Member Masica made introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption ordering the project as proposed with the inclusion of the stone columns at the City's expense: RESOLUTION NO. 2001-32 ORDERING SOUND WALL IMPROVEMENTS NO. SA -1 AND SA -2 WHEREAS, the Edina City Council on the 3rd of April, 2001, fixed a date for a Council hearing on the proposed sound abatement walls, Improvement No. SA -1 and Improvement No. SA -2; and WHEREAS, fourteen days' mailed notice and two weeks' published notice of the hearing was given, and the hearing was held thereon on the 5th day of June 2001, for Improvement No. SA -1 consisting of a sound abatement wall constructed along the 690 feet north of the Brendan Glenn Plat adjacent to T.H. 169 and for Improvement No. SA -2 consisting of a sound abatement wall along T.H. 169 adjacent to Indian Way West. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Council has duly considered the views of all persons interested, and being fully advised of the pertinent facts, does hereby determine to proceed with the . construction of said improvement, including all proceedings which may be necessary in eminent domain for the acquisition of necessary easements and rights hereby designated and shall be referred to in all subsequent proceedings as. Improvement No. SA -1 consisting of a sound abatement wall constructed along the 690 feet north of the Brendan Glenn Plat adjacent to T.H. 169 and for Improvement No. SA -2 consisting of a sound abatement wall along T.H. 169 adjacent to Indian Way West. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Improvement No. Improvement No. SA -1 consisting of a sound abatement wall constructed along the 690 feet north of the Brendan Glenn Plat adjacent to T.H. 169 and Improvement No. SA -2 consisting of a sound abatement wall along T.H. 169 adjacent to Indian Way West is hereby ordered as proposed. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Engineer is hereby designated as the engineer for this improvement. The engineer shall cause plans and specifications to be prepared for the making of such improvement. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council will hold a hearing to consider the special assessment for the aforementioned improvement at its regular meeting on July 17, 2001. Passed and adopted this 5th day of June 2001. Member Hovland seconded the motion. Rollcall Ayes: Hovland, Masica, Maetzold Nays: Housh, Kelly Motion carried on a 3 -2 vote. *RESOLUTION NO. 2001 -44 ADOPTED APPROVING LOT DIVISION FOR CBS REAL ESTATE PARTNERSHIP - 4555 AND 4565 WEST 77TH STREET Motion made by Member Kelly and seconded by Member Hovland approving the following resolution: RESOLUTION NO. 2001-44 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A LOT DIVISION FOR 4555 AND 4565 WEST 77TH STREET WHEREAS, the following described property is at present a single tract of land: Tract B, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1682, Hennepin County, Minnesota; and Page 9 Minutes/Edina City Council/Tune 5, 2001 WHEREAS, the owner has requested the subdivision of said tract into separate parcels (herein called "parcels ") described as follows: PARCEL A: That part of Tract B, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1682, according to the recorded survey thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying southerly of a line described as beginning at the most westerly southwest corner of said Tract B; thence on an assumed bearing of East along a south line of said Tract B and its easterly extension a distance of 304.20 feet to the east line of said Tract B and there terminating. PARCEL B: That part of Tract B, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1682, according to the recorded survey thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying northerly of a line described as beginning at the most westerly southwest corner of said Tract B; thence on an assumed bearing of East along a south line of said Tract B and its easterly extension of 304.20 feet to the east line of said Tract B and there terminating. WHEREAS, the requested subdivision is authorized under Code Section 810 and it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said newly created Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purpose of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the Edina City Code Sections 810 and 850; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of the above described tracts of land (PARCEL A and PARCEL B) as separate tracts of land are hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Code Sections 850 and 810 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but only to the extent - permitted under Code Sections 810 and 850 subject to the limitations set out in Code Section 850 and said Ordinances are now waived for any other purpose or as to any other provisions thereof, and further subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent Ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those Ordinances. Adopted this 5th day of June 2001. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *HEARING DATE SET OF TUNE 19, 2001, FOR PLANNING MATTERS Motion made by Member Kelly and seconded by Member Hovland for the following planning matters: 1. Final Rezoning - Noonan Construction Company, 5400 France Avenue 2. Final Rezoning and Final Plat - Amendment to comprehensive Plan - JMS Development and Thorpe Real Estate, 6512 Vernon Avenue Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. RESOLUTION NO 2001 -45 - FINAL PLAT APPROVED FOR GRANDVIEW SQUARE SECOND ADDITION Planner Larsen explained that the property was located south of Eden Avenue and east of Sherwood Circle. Phase II of Grandview Square would complete the platting of the entire development. Included are outlots remaining from Phase I as well as three properties not controlled at the time of the original approval —the Edina Pet Hospital, the Classic Hair Design and the Noonan Office Building. The plat will provide a lot for the library/ senior center building, a lot for the second condominium building, and an outlot for Page 10 Minutes/Edina City Council/iune 5, 2001 the rearranged Sherwood Park. The Council at their May 15, 2001 meeting approved the preliminary plat for the plat. Member Kelly introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 200145 RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR GRANDVIEW SQUARE 2ND ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled, " GRANDVIEW SQUARE 2ND ADDITION ", platted by the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority and the City of Edina, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council on June 5, 2001, be and is hereby granted final plat approval. Passed this 5th day of June 2001. Member Housh.seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold Resolution adopted. RESOLUTIONS NO. 2001 -35 AND NO. 2001 -36 AND ORDINANCE NO. 2001-4, ADOPTED, RESCINDING ORDINANCE NO. 2000 -11 AND N0. 2000 -12, AWARDING CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISES Manager Hughes reminded the Council on December 19, 2000, they adopted ordinances granting WideOpenWest Minnesota LLC and Everest Minnesota Licensee LLC franchises to operate cable television systems within the City. Last March, the City received letters from WideOpenWest and Everest stating that they would be unable to pursue the installation of cable systems at the present time and requested therefore that the franchise ordinances previously approved by the City be rescinded. The attached resolutions and Ordinance No. 2001 -04 rescind Ordinance No. 2000 -11 and Ordinance No. 2000 -12 which granted the subject franchises. Member Hovland introduced the following resolution seconded by Member Masica: RESOLUTION NO. 2001-35 RESCINDING CABLE COMMUNICATIONS FRANCHISE ORDINANCE GRANTED TO WIDEOPENWEST MINNESOTA, LLC WHEREAS, in April 2000, WideOpenWest Minnesota, LLC ( "WideOpenWest ") requested that the City of Edina, Minnesota ( "City ") commence proceedings under Minn. Stat. § 238.081 to consider the grant of a cable television franchise ( "Franchise ") to WideOpenWest; and WHEREAS, in response to WideOpenWest's request, the City undertook all necessary steps required by Minn. Stat. § 238.081 to consider the grant of a Franchise; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Minn. Stat. § 238.081 subd. 6, the City adopted a resolution determining that WideOpenWest possessed the requisite legal, technical and financial qualifications to operate a cable television system within the City; and WHEREAS, the City and WideOpenWest subsequently conducted negotiations and arrived at mutually acceptable terms and conditions for a Franchise; and WHEREAS, on December 19, 2000, the City adopted an Ordinance granting WideOpenWest a Franchise to own and operate a cable system within the City subject to acceptance by WideOpenWest; and WHEREAS, on March 23, 2001, the City received a written letter from D. Craig Martin, Esq., of WideOpenWest informing the City of WideOpenWest's inability to accept the Ordinance granting a Franchise due to adverse market conditions; and Page 11 Minutes/Edina City Council/lune 5, 2001 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the City of Edina, Minnesota hereby resolves that Ordinance No. 2000 -12, granting a Franchise to WideOpenWest is hereby rescinded in its entirety; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the process undertaken by the City pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 238.081 is hereby completed as it relates to WideOpenWest's request for a Franchise; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, in the event WideOpenWest should seek a Franchise from the City it must reinitiate the statutory procedure required under Minn. Stat. § 238 -081, as well as negotiate with the City mutually acceptable terms and conditions for a new Franchise. Approved this 5`h day of June 2001. Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold Resolution adopted. Member Hovland introduced the following resolution seconded by Member Masica: RESOLUTION NO. 2001-36 RESCINDING CABLE COMMUNICATIONS FRANCHISE ORDINANCE GRANTED TO EVEREST MINNESOTA LICENSEE, LLC WHEREAS, in April 2000, Everest Minnesota Licensee, LLC ( "Everest ") requested that the City of Edina, Minnesota ( "City") commence proceedings under Minn. Stat. § 238.081 to consider the grant of a cable television franchise ( "Franchise ") to Everest; and WHEREAS, in response to Everest's request, the City undertook all necessary steps required by Minn. Stat. § 238.081 to consider the grant of a Franchise; and WHEREAS, in accordance . with Minn. Stat. § 238.081 subd. 6, the City adopted a resolution determining that Everest possessed the requisite legal, technical and financial qualifications to operate a cable television system within the City; and WHEREAS, the City and Everest subsequently conducted negotiations and arrived at mutually acceptable terms and conditions for a Franchise; and WHEREAS, on December 19, 2000, the City adopted an Ordinance granting Everest a Franchise to own and operate a cable system within the City subject to acceptance by Everest; and WHEREAS, on March 9, 2001, the City received a written letter from Michael L. Deggendorf on behalf of Everest informing the City of Everest's inability to accept the Ordinance granting a Franchise due to adverse market conditions; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the City of Edina, Minnesota, hereby resolves that Ordinance No. 2000 -11, granting a Franchise to Everest is hereby rescinded in its entirety; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the process undertaken by the City pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 238.081 is hereby completed as it relates to Everest's request for a Franchise; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, in the event Everest should seek a Franchise from the city, it must reinitiate the statutory procedure required under Minn. Stat. § 238.081, as well as negotiate with the City mutually acceptable terms and conditions for a new Franchise. Approved this 5`h day of June 2001. Member Hovland introduced the following ordinance, seconded by Member Masica: EDINA ORDINANCE NO. 2001 - 4 An Ordinance Rescinding Previously. Enacted Ordinances of the City of Edina. The City Council of the City of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Ordinance No. 2000 -11 granting a Franchise to Everest Minnesota Licensee, LLC is hereby rescinded in its entirety. Section 2. Ordinance No. 2000 -12 granting a Franchise to WideOpenWest is hereby rescinded in its entirety. Page 12 Minutes/Edina City CounciVjune 5, 2001 Section 3. The process undertaken by the City of Edina pursuant to Minn. Stats. § 238 -081, is hereby completed as it relates to WideOpenWest and Everest Minnesota Licensee, LLC requests for a Franchise. Section 4. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon adoption. Adopted this 5th day of June 2001. Attest City Clerk Mayor Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold Motion carried. BID FOR SOUND ABATEMENT IMPROVEMENT PROTECTS SA -1 AND SA -2 APPROVED, CONTRACT 01 -06 (ENGINEERING) CONTINUED TO TUNE 19, 2001 Engineer Hoffman explained the bid for decorative pre -cast sound barriers, (improvement numbers SA -1 and SA -2) along McCauley Trail from the north line of Brendan Glenn Plat to north line of 6453 McCauley Trail and McCauley Trail (west side) between south line of 6737 Indian Way West to north line of 6617 Indian Way West will be financed through special assessments to abutting neighbors who have petitioned for these improvements. Following a brief discussion, Council consensus was to continue the award of bid to June 19, 2001, allowing staff to discuss the addendum further with the contractors. *BID AWARDED FOR ASPHALT REPAIR - WATER MAIN BREAKS Motion made by Member Kelly and seconded by Member Hovland for award of bid for asphalt repair for water main breaks to recommended low bidder, Asphalt Contractors, Inc., at' $32,800.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR COMPUTER SOFTWARE UPGRADES Motion made by Member Kelly and seconded by Member Hovland for award of bid for computer software upgrades to Software House International, under State Contract No. 425551, at $25,144.65. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *RESOLUTION NO. 2001 -39 - AOL/TIME WARNER TRANSFER OF CONTROL Motion made by Member Kelly and seconded by Member Hovland approving the following resolution: RESOLUTION NO. 2001-39 APPROVING THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE RESOLUTION APPROVING THE TRANSFER OF CONTROL OF KBL CABLESYSTEMS. OF THE SOUTHWEST, INC., THE CABLE TELEVISION FRANCHISEE, TO AOL TIME WARNER WHEREAS, the City of Edina, Minnesota ( "City ") passed and adopted Resolution No. 2000 -46, approving the transfer of control of KBL Cablesystems of the Southwest, Inc., to AOL Time Warner ( "Franchisee ") subject to certain specified criteria including, but not limited to, the receipt of a signed Acceptance upon thirty (30) days of the date of the transfer closing. WHEREAS, AOL Time Warner inadvertently failed to execute and forward a signed Acceptance upon thirty (30) days of the date of the transfer closing as required. Page 13 Minutes/Edina City Council/Tune 5, 2001 NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council for the Cityy resolves as follows: 1. The City hereby extends the thirty (30) day requirement required in Resolution No. 2000 -46 Section 3 (c) until July 31, 2001. This Resolution shall take effect and continue and remain in effect from and after the date of its passage, approval, and adoption. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *RESOLUTION NO. 2001 -38 - ADOPTING JOINT AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR USE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT PERSONNEL AND EQUIPMENT - HENNEPIN COUNTY CHIEF'S OF POLICE ASSOCIATION MUTUAL AID PACT Motion made by Member Kelly and. seconded by Member Hovland approving the following resolution: RESOLUTION NO. 2001-38 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE JOINT AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR USE OF LAW ENFORCEMENT PERSONNEL AND EQUIPMENT OF JULY 1, 2001 WHEREAS, the City of Edina and. Hennepin County has previously approved and participated in a mutual aid agreement between the police agencies within Hennepin County to provide cooperative use of police personnel and equipment, and WHEREAS, such agreement was most recently approved by the Edina City Council July 25,1968, and WHEREAS, the participating governmental units have determined that it is advisable to clarify and update the language of that agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Edina that the Joint and Cooperative Agreement for Use of Law Enforcement Personnel and Equipment, ( "Agreement') dated July 1, 2001 from the Hennepin County Chiefs of Police Association be approved, that the City of Edina is withdrawing from the previous Hennepin County Mutual Aid Agreement on the effective date in the new Agreement and that Michael J. Siitari is authorized and directed to execute said Agreement on behalf of the City of Edina as a participating member of the Agreement. Passed by a vote of ayes and nays this fifth day of June 2001. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. JOINT POWERS AND GROUND LEASE AGREEMENT FOR SOUTHWEST METRO PUBLIC SAFETY TRAINING CENTER CONTINUED TO TUNE 19, 2001 Chief Scheerer explained the Southwest Metro Public Safety Training Center began back in 1994, with the concept of building a police and fire training facility jointly with Bloomington, Eden Prairie, Metropolitan Airport Commission (MAC) Police and Richfield. There has been a great need for this facility. A joint project would include a larger facility with better equipment, lower operating costs, 24 hours -a -day availability and standardized training exercises. Originally, a site in Bloomington was considered but it became unavailable. After much research, the old gun range site at Braemar Park was selected for several reasons, 1) a central location, 2) the site would be Edina's "in- kind" contribution towards construction cost of the facility, and 3) distance from residential areas, terrain, water supply and access. The delay in construction has been due to the length of time taken to secure funding from the State of Minnesota. The consortium lobbied for State funding beginning in 1996. In the 1999 legislative session, a task force was funded to develop a statewide plan to determine the Page 14 Minutes/Edina City Council/Tune 5, 2001 location and funding of Public Safety Training Centers. In the 2000 legislative session, the state legislature approve $500,000 for the South Metro Public Safety Training Center. In addition, in 2000, the City of Richfield opted out of the facility due to financial restraints. Mr. Scheerer continued stating that in 2001, Bloomington, Eden Prairie, Edina and MAC were preparing to move forward and construct the training center with a completion date of late 2002. A video was presented explaining the need for such a training center. Components of the facility would include; 1) an indoor firing range for both short -range and long -range firearms, 2) a computer - controlled fire tower and residential structure, 3) classrooms, 4) driving simulator and 5) a computer controlled decision - shooting range. Mr. Scheerer explained the organizational structure of the center would be through the proposed Joint Powers Agreement. The land would be owned by the City of Edina and leased to the other powers with a proposed Ground Lease Agreement. The cost of the facility ($6.2 million, less $0.5 million grant) would be divided as follows: • Bloomington 42.5% ($2.5 million) • Eden Prairie 219% ($1.3 million) • Edina 20.0% ($1.2 million - includes $950,000 for land) • MAC (Police) 14.6% ($.85 MILLION) The $195,000 annual operating expenses would be divided by the same percentage. The construction expenditure for Edina would be $200,000 - $250,000, and funded through the Capital Improvement Plan. Edina's portion of the yearly operating expense ($39,000) would come from savings in overtime, travel and training fees. The facility would also generate rental income that could be used to offset operating expenses or to fund capital improvements. Mr. Scheerer said the need for the center has increased yearly as gun ranges have closed and live fire training eliminated. Both the Edina Police and Fire Departments have had a large turnover of personnel and newly hired staff have not been trained to the level of former new personnel. The Training Center had previously been supported by past Edina Councils through resolutions adopted in both 1997 and 1999. Mr. Scheerer recommended approval of the Joint Powers Agreement and the Ground Lease Agreement. Police Chief Siitari said his focus would be on the gun range. The Police Department needs the gun range to accomplish their mission of 'protect and serve'. With the loss of the gun range four years ago, hand -gun skills have dramatically dropped. The Edina Police Department have been vagabonds for four years, and consider themselves fortunate to get four shoots in a year. Mr. Siitari noted recent incidents in the City establishing the need for proficient hand -gun training. He stated the proposal was the best we can hope for with the in -kind contribution. He said ultimately this proposal would be for the good of the residents, not the Police or Fire Departments. Page 15 Minutes/Edina City CounciViune 5, 2001 State Representative Erhardt indicated he was surprised to read the objections about the training facility in the Edina Sun - Current recently because the facility has been underway for approximately six years. He and Senator Terwilliger have worked with the Legislature to acquire funding for the facility and a number of out -state cities have followed suit. The facility . was more important than any sports field because it concerns the safety of all of Edina. He reminded the Council that twice previously resolutions have been passed supporting the facility. A facsimile dated June 6, 2001, was received from Mark Tesija, 7504 Hyde Park Drive, voicing concern with a shooting range being located close to his home. Council Comment Member Kelly asked if the facility does not go forward, what would happen to the earmarked $500,000 from the State Legislature. Chief Scheerer explained the dollars would go to the Commissioner of Public Safety and possibly to the general fund. Member Kelly asked if Maple Grove was trying to also build a training facility. Mr. Scheerer responded they do have a small facility but were seeking funding to enlarge it to include fire personnel.. Representative Erhardt reiterated that Maple Grove does not have the room to build as large a facility as the one proposed for the Braemar gun range site. Member Housh said while he saw the need for a training facility and was not opposed to it; other issues were pressing after the May 161h referendum failure. He suggested re- thinking the use of the area before pressing ahead with a training facility. He voiced surprise with how adamant the Park Board was against the training facility. Representative Erhardt said he found it strange too since this had been proposed for approximately six years. Member Masica asked where the Police Department was currently taking firearm training. Chief Siitari replied the Department uses an Air Force range near the airport, when available. They have also used a small facility in Minneapolis and a location in St. Louis Park. Member Masica asked if any officers take training on their own, not as structured by the City, Mr. Siitari answered that the force's better shooters go on their own to private ranges. Member Masica asked how many acres were undeveloped in the Braemar Park area. Mr. Hughes said he did not know the exact acreage. Member Masica commended Mr. Hughes for the stellar job he has done putting the proposal together and negotiating for the City. Before the referendum, she said she was behind the facility proposal 1000 %, but this property was one of the last developable pieces in Edina. Member Masica said she had been receiving calls about what the City was going to do now for recreational facilities for the residents. She believes the area needs further study. Mayor Maetzold said the City was involved in many businesses, but the area where the most money was spent was public safety. He believes it imperative that Fire and Police personnel be highly trained. The training facility would be a good value for Edina and meets a critical need. The alternatives for recreational facilities have not gone away. Gymnasiums could be built adjacent or attached to Braemar Arena or the YMCA. He added that playing fields would be best located on School District property. Mr. Maetzold, said calls to him have been in favor of bringing the issue back to the public in a 'different way'. The Blue Ribbon Committee said the proposed training facility property was not good for recreational uses. Page 16 Minutes/Edina City Council/Tune 5, 2001 Member Housh asked the issue be tabled to consider items in the referendum that would be of most importance. He said he viewed the Braemar area as a recreational area and asked again for the issue to be tabled. Member Masica acknowledged the training center as a critical need for the Police and Fire Departments, but questioned whether the other involved cities might have more available land than Edina. She agreed the issue should be tabled and stated she would like more information from the Park Board and the general public. Member Hovland said he recently conversed with one member of the Police Department and was told training was sporadic and done at a great distance from Edina. Member Hovland added that training for Police or Fire personnel was similar to military training, requiring frequent practice. Having the facility in Edina would be beneficial and a top priority. Member Hovland said he believed recreational needs could be met at other locations in the City and reminded the Council that the Edina City Council had given their word to our neighboring cities that the property would be used for the training facility. It did not seem honorable to back away from that commitment. He pointed out that Representative Erhardt had explained how hard he and Senator Terwilliger have worked to get to this point and the best use of the land would be for a training facility. Member Kelly asked what the risk would be if the proposal were tabled for two to three months. Manager Hughes said he did not know what the conditions would be on the earmarked $500,000. One possibility could be that one or more of the partners might fall out of the mix. He said he would rather the issue were delayed for two to three months than denied at this time. Member Kelly asked if any of the interested cities have available land for a training facility. Manager Hughes explained if land exists, the cities have not been forthcoming with it. Mr. Kelly said he was not convinced that this decision could not be held for a few months. Mayor Maetzold said this piece of land had not been considered for parkland. He voiced concern with building freestanding gymnasiums facilities. He said he hoped the whole park program did not depend on these three acres. Member Hovland restated that he believes this facility would be the highest and best use for the property. Tabling this could give the signal that we intend to change our minds. The honorable thing to do would be to keep our promise to the other cities. Director Keprios said the original use of the site was for a gun range and was donated by Dr. Whipperman, in memory of his son, to teach gun safety. Use of the facility for a gun range would be putting the site back into its originally intended use. Mr. Scheerer reminded the Council that 1) this was park property, 2) other cities would love to have the facility in their city, but were unable to come up with a location, 3) building the facility in Edina was worth $1,000,000 to the City and 4) $40,000 operating costs would be a Page 17 Minutes/Edina City Council/iune 5, 2001 wash if it was in Edina, but would cost $40,000 annually if the facility were built in another city. Member Housh said the whole Council would like the facility built. Following the referendum loss, residents voiced concern with a School /City partnership to solve recreation issue. This. meant also that City land was even more important. He suggested again tabling the issue for a couple of months allowing further study. Mayor Maetzold said the Park and Recreation programs were functioning although they need more fields and gymnasiums. The Police and Fire Departments do not have a facility and cannot train as needed. Member Housh asked if a consensus could be reached by the Council to work on recreational facilities for the community. He said if the issue was not tabled, he would not vote no. Member Hovland concurred and stated his wish to start work on recreational facilities for the community. Member Kelly said three months delay would not kill this seven -year project. The previous Councils, of which he was a part, made a commitment. Based on the Park Board unanimously thinking the issue should be examined further, the issue should be tabled and all needs balanced before a decision was made. Member Hovland said by tabling the issue, the wrong message was portrayed to the other players. He stated again that he believes the City's recreational needs could be met in other ways. Mayor Maetzold concurred with Member Hovland and reminded the Council of the dollars the City would have to spend if the facility was built in another location. Mr. Hughes added that if the facility were built in another location Edina would have to borrow the dollars possibly through a lease revenue bond. Attorney Gilligan explained that approximately five years ago the legislature got special legislation allowing up to one million dollars in general obligation bonds approved. Member Housh made a motion to table the approval until the regular Council meeting in August. Member Kelly seconded the motion. Member Masica said while she admires Member Hovland's integrity and sense of ethics this was a change in circumstances. She inquired whether the vacant land in the Braemar area could house a multi- purpose recreational center. Mr. Hughes said the property has a significant hill and while the developable area could possibly handle a multi- purpose center, parking would be problem. Additionally, the County just installed an 800 MHz tower at the pinnacle of the hill. He stated deep reservations regarding operating costs with creating a freestanding facility not attached to another building. Member Masica said if this issue was tabled, staff needs direction reflecting the Council's wishes. Member Kelly said the Council needs to direct staff to examine the alternatives for gymnasium and field space and to inform the public and the Park Board. Mr. Hughes indicated what he believed would be achievable Page 18 Minutes/Edina City Council/iune 5, 2001 in a few months was an examination of the site and a decision of what alternative uses would fit on the site. He voiced concern with trying to replicate in two months, all the work the Blue Ribbon Committee did on the bigger issue such as "how does this site relate to other sites in the City ". Member Kelly mentioned a few sites that could work for recreational facilities. Mr. Hughes explained those sites had been examined in the past. Mayor Maetzold asked if other sites could be examined in a broad perspective. Mr. Hughes said it took two years to bring this issue to a referendum, and bringing back a plan "b" in two months would be impossible. Member Housh voiced concern with losing the $500,000. Chief Scheerer said he believed the dollars would be fine but the coalition would not. Mr. Hughes added loss of the dollars seems remote but he will talk to the other members of the coalition about a three -month delay. Member Kelly added that the need for a training facility was not going away. Member Hovland again stated that the need could not be met in any of the other cities. He asked if withdrawing the issue might be a better idea than tabling it. Member Housh withdrew his motion to table the issue of approving the Joint Powers and Ground Lease agreement for the South Metro Public Safety Training Center and asked postponement of the issue to the June 19, 2001, regular Council Meeting. Member Kelly seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold Motion carried. *RESOLUTION NO. 2001 -42 - AMENDED Mn/DOT AGREEMENT NO. 803598 APPROVED Motion made by Member Kelly and seconded by Member Hovland approving the following resolution: RESOLUTION NO. 2001-42 A RESOLUTION AMENDING Mn/DOT AGREEMENT NO. 80359R NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Edina enter into Mq/DOT Amended Agreement No. 80359R with the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation for the following purposes: To remove the existing traffic control signals and install new traffic control signals with street lights, emergency vehicle pre - emption and signing on Trunk Highway No. 100 West Ramps - Trunk Highway No. 100 West Frontage Roads at Industrial Boulevard - Industrial Boulevard/West 77th Street, on Trunk Highway No. 100 East Ramps - Trunk Highway No. 100 East Frontage Roads at West 77th Street - West 77th Street/Industrial Boulevard, and on West 77th Street at Pentagon Park Office - Private Drive; and install interconnect on West 77th StreeVIndustrial Boulevard from Metro Boulevard to Pentagon Park Office - Private Drive in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth and contained in Agreement No. 803598, a copy of which was before the Council. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the proper City officers be and hereby are authorized to execute such agreement and any amendments, and thereby assume for and on behalf of the City all of the contractual obligations contained therein. Adopted this 5th day of June 2001. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. Page 19 Minutes/Edina City Council/iune 5, 2001 WATER PRESENTATION DELAYED UNTIL FUTURE COUNCIL MEETING The Council directed staff to bring the presentation on water back at a future meeting due to the late hour of the meeting. NEW WINE AND BEER LICENSE FOR BEAUTO'S LTD, (4950 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH) APPROVED Mr. Hughes explained that Beaujo's, Ltd., d.b.a. Beaujo's applied to the- City for an on -sale wine and 3.2 beer license for a new business to be located at, 4950 France Avenue. The applicant filed all necessary documentation for liquor licenses and paid the applicable license fees. The Planning Department reviewed the application and found that it complies with code requirements. The Health Department was satisfied with the applicants' plan for storage and service and had their food license for processing. The Police Department completed their investigation and found nothing negative with the process going forward. Member Kelly made a motion approving the new wine and beer license for Beaujo's, LTD, 4950 France Avenue South. Member Housh seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold Motion carried. *RESOLUTION 2001 -40 - APPROVING NO PARKING AT 76TH STREET AND YORK AVENUE APPROVED Member Kelly introduced the following resolution, seconded by Member Hovland: RESOLUTION NO. 200140 RELATING TO PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON WEST 76TH STREET FROM EDINBOROUGH WAY TO XERXES AVENUE - S.A.P. 120-136-15 THIS RESOLUTION passed this 51h day of June 2001, by the City of Edina in Hennepin County, Minnesota. The Municipal Corporation shall hereinafter be called the "City ", WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the "City", has planned the improvement of MSAS 136, W. 761h Street from Edinborough Way to Xerxes Avenue. WHEREAS, the "City", will be expending Municipal Street Aid Funds on the improvement of this Street, and WHEREAS, this improvement does not provide adequate width for parking on both sides of the street, and approval of the proposed construction as a Municipal State Aid Street project must therefore be conditioned upon certain parking restrictions. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS THEREBY RESOLVED that the "City ", shall ban the parking of motor vehicles on both sides of MSAS 136, W. 76th Street, at all times. Dated this 5th Day of June 2001. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. CONCERN OF RESIDENT Ami Sharpe, 4132 West 45th Street voiced concern with the spraying of weeds in her neighborhood park - Kojetin Park. She questioned certain aspects of the turf management plan and stated that the use of 2,4 -D is detrimental to anyone in its path. Ms. Sharpe asked the Council to direct the Park Department to stop the increased spraying and to include the Community Health Council in decisions regarding turf management. She asked when the turf management plan was modified that citizens would be notified. Page 20 Minutes/Edina City Council/Tune 5, 2001 Member Housh inquired of Park Director Keprios whether the turf management plan had been violated. Member Kelly said the Council voluntarily decided to depart from the plan because the parks were 90% weeds. Director Keprios commented that the City was somewhat in violation of the plan. Crews had been directed to spray "C" areas but were told to stay 50 feet away from all playground structures. Cornelia Park and Creek Valley will not be sprayed. He reiterated the most fiscally responsible thing to do was to spray since re- turfinent was clearly not an option. Member Housh asked how long was the acceptable time to stay off a sprayed area. Director Keprios explained areas were posted before spraying to keep off the sprayed area for 24 hours. He said the City was extremely careful when they are spraying chemicals. Mayor Maetzold asked if organic herbicides could be used. Director Keprios said the department had tried organic herbicide but found it turned the grass brown and the long -term effects were not known. Member Masica asked again about the acceptable time to stay off a sprayed area. Director Keprios said it was, recommended to stay off for one day. Sanitarian Velde explained that 2,4 -D was not on a list of carcinogens or suspected carcinogenic compounds. The National Pesticide Telecommunications Network, funded by the Environmental Protection Agency, wrote the half -life of 2,4 -D in the soil was ten days. Member Housh asked if lawn services use 2,4 -D. Mr. Velde answered that lawn services could be using many products for different uses; insect control, etc. but 2,4 -D was used generally for broad leaf weeds. Mr. Hughes said since the adoption of the turf management plan, the use of herbicides had decreased significantly on City property. He believes the City had been judicious in the use of herbicides. Ms. Sharpe asked if "C" parks could be re- examined by the Community Health Committee. Mr. Hughes suggested Park and Recreation Department staff look at the turf management plan with regards to "C" classification parks and come back with suggestions to the Council. CONCERN OF RESIDENT Ryan Langsev, 5801 Concord Avenue told of his concern over Metro Transit buses operating on Concord Avenue and South View Lane. He explained he had contacted both the School District and Metro Transit to complain about the buses. Metro Transit informed him that Edina Schools and the City of Edina has approved the South View Middle School Park and Ride. Mr. Langsev reported that Doug Johnson of Edina Schools has written to Metro Transit rescinding the District's permission to locate a park and ride at South View. He requested the City take similar action. Maria Fesenmaier, 5713 Concord Avenue, President of ECC Neighborhood Association also expressed her concern about the bus route. Following a brief discussion, Member Kelly introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2001-43 WHEREAS, the Metro Transit had located a park and ride facility at Edina School District's South View Middle School located at 4725 South View Lane; and Page 21 Minutes/Edina City Council/lune 5, 2001 WHEREAS, Metro Transit had routed buses to accommodate this park and ride location over South View Lane and Concord Avenue; and WHEREAS, Concord Elementary School, South View Middle School and Normandale Elementary School are all located in close proximity to the aforementioned bus routes; and WHEREAS, the Edina School District has withdrawn permission for the Metro Transit to use South View Middle School as a bus park and ride location. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council hereby requests Metro Transit to immediately remove bus routes and bus stops from Concord-Avenue and South View Lane. Adopted this 51h day of June 2001. Member Hovland seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold Resolution adopted. *CLAIMS PAID Member Kelly made a motion and Member Hovland seconded the motion approving payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated May 16, 2001, and consisting of 35 pages: General Fund $219,078.36; Communications Fund $25,828.51; Working Capital Fund $18,839.78; Art Center Fund $3,118.94, Golf Dome Fund $1,134.09, Aquatic Center Fund $1,167.00, Golf Course Fund $112,018.12; Ice Arena Fund $15,196.33; Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fund $21,120.51; Liquor Fund $111,026.58; Utility Fund $254,546.49; Storm Sewer Fund $682.95; Recycling Fund $30,378.50, Payroll Fund $485,000.00; TOTAL $1,299,136.16, and the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated May 23, 2001, and consisting of 29 pages: General Fund $203,891.97, Communications Fund $11,377.34; Working Capital $1,524.68; Construction Fund $5,564.73; Art Center Fund $9,822.01; Golf Dome Fund $200.00, Aquatic Center Fund $5,858.79, Golf Course Fund $28,458.70; Ice Arena Fund - $1,394.67; Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fund $4,737.81; Liquor Fund $99,015.25; Utility Fund $10,755.41; Storm Sewer Fund $1,156.72, Recycling Fund $109.00; HRA Fund $185,000.00, TOTAL 568,867.08; and the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated May .30, 2001, and consisting of 42 pages: General Fund $166,960.81; Communications Fund $87.25; Working Capital Fund $1,424.03; Construction Fund $240.00; Art Center Fund $8,716.10; Golf Dome Fund $1,049.00, Aquatic Center Fund $9,707.83; Golf Course Fund $44,512.79, Ice, Arena Fund $479.40, Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fund $9,869.27; Liquor Fund $181,471.12; Utility Fund $57,360.16, Recycling Fund $10.06; Payroll Fund $320,000.00; TOTAL $801,887.82. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Maetzold declared the meeting adjourned at 11:02 P.M. City Clerk Page 92 -e, 6 yre a r � v REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item: ILA. From: Craig Larsen Consent ❑ City Planner Information Only ❑ Date: 'June 19, 2001 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject:. Action: ❑ Motion Final Rezoning, Noonan ❑ Resolution Construction Company. ® Ordinance 5400 France,Avenue. ❑ Discussion Recommendation: The Planning Commission recommends Final Rezoning approval subject to: 1. Staff approved landscaping plan and bond. Info /Background: See attached Planning Commission minutes, staff report and plans. DRAFT MINUTES P.C. MEETING MAY 30, 2001 Z -01 -1 Edward and Lisa Noonan 5400 France Avenue South Mr. Larsen told the Commission at the May 1, 2001, Council Meeting Edward and Lisa Noonan received preliminary rezoning approval. PCD-4, Planned Commercial District -4 to PCD -1, Planned Commercial District -1. Mr. Larsen said at this time the proponents are requesting final rezoning. Mr. Larsen concluded staff recommends final rezoning subject to a landscaping plan and Landscaping Bond. The proponent, Mr. Ed Noonan was present to respond to questions. Chairman Johnson asked Mr. Larsen if landscaping is required on the west side of the property. Mr. Larsen said ordinance does not require landscaping in that area. Commissioner Workinger asked Mr. Larsen if he believes the landscaping along the south property line is adequate. Mr. Larsen said the landscaping along the south property line meets code, but the Commission can recommend more landscaping in that area if desired. Mr. Noonan interjected along the southern property line there are some evergreens, scrub trees, and grass. He told the Commission the entire site will be cleaned and cleared of dead brush and trees, and replanting and reseeding will occur. Commissioner Runyan asked Mr. Noonan if he will use the existing pylon sign. Mr. Noonan said he is not planning to use the existing pylon sign. Commissioner Workinger interjected and asked Mr. Noonan if he would be willing to remove the pylon sign. Mr. Noonan said he is willing to remove the pylon sign. Commissioner Swenson asked Mr. Larsen if parking requirements are met. Mr. Larsen said parking complies with City Code. Commissioner Ingwalson moved to recommend final rezoning approval subject to receipt of a landscaping plan and bond. Commissioner Runyan seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. LOCATION MAP 91,4 ,:.. 90 9 — ------ Z- - - - - -- 11`0% M 4 I r x " 14i' 2 3 LU --F (957 - - -• ` ' aj�� • � � � _. � LU 41 a _ I Q ; .^ 4176 (97) o (Se) LL- id. - 42119, ' A 4 I'F Lvu 4 2 20) . .� 4 _.!_-------•----•----- 16i ( �6) 343 � 437 (9) 1: 'S REZONING NUMBER Z -01 -1 L O C A T 10 N 5400 France Avenue R E O U E S T Rezone PCD -4 to PCD -1 j(7,,;543 543 I P c e. ( EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT I • L-11 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL MAY 1, 2001- 7:00 P.M. Y2 nT 1 c a i .T . A nswerina rollcall were Members Hovland, Kell X, Ma a or Maetzold. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion seconded by Member Masica approving the Coun Rollcall: Ayes: Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold Motion carried. Member Hovland Meeting of April" Motion c °' by Member Hovland and Agenda as presented. GS O IL 16 - ZY2001 APPROVED Motion made by Oollcall'vote er Masica approving the Minutes of the Regular oard of Review Meetings of April 16 and April 23, 2001. - four ayes. DISTRICT- AL DISTRICT4 3ENSIVE PLAN FOR EDWARD AND LISA NOONAN - 54uu rXAiN% -r, 1;01 TM APPROVED Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Presentati on by Planner Planner Larsen explained the subject property is located in the southwest corner of West 54th Street and France Avenue. The property is currently Zoned PCD-4, Planned Commercial District. The PCD-4 district allows various automotive service uses. The site was originally developed as a gas station in 1950. The tanks were removed in 1991, and the site was converted to a Mr. Tire. The building also housed a CAR -X facility, but is currently vacant. Mr. Larsen said Ed Noonan petitioned the City to rezone the property to PCD -1. The PCD -1 district is a general retail district. The property immediately west of the subject property is PCD -1. Mr. Noonan intends to remodel the building for office use. The building has three service bays facing France Avenue and one facing West 54th Street. Mr. Noonan plans to convert one bay into office space and leave the remaining square or parking i an additional he proposed remodeling would create an office area of q feet of storage area. Seven parking spaces would be required for this facility by Edina Code. The proposed site plan illustrates 11 angle stalls, 2 parallel stalls and 3 in -door stalls. Mr. Larsen stated that Mr. Noonan's plan includes completely redoing the exterior of the building. The existing flat roof would be replaced with a pitched roofed of either cedar or slate shingles. Exterior walls would be brick and stucco with wooden garage doors. The proposed materials meet Edina Code. Parking and circulation would remain unchanged. Mr. Page 1 Minutes/Edina City Council/May 1, 2001 ti Larsen said the Planning Commission recommended approval of proposal subject to: Final Rezoning, landscaping plan, and bond. Council comment Member Kelly asked what the status is of the property at 44th and France. Planner Larsen explained the building is being occupied by tenants and Ed Noonan, was pleased to have located the building at 5400 France for his business. Member Kelly inquired further, about the property at 44th and France. Manager Hughes recollected there were concerns about. the site's orientation and the parking garage. Mr. Larsen, indicated with some re- engineering of the parking garage .the parking variance was solved. Variances issued were because of non- conforming setbacks, not the new structure. Use of the building was limited to non -food related businesses. Member Masica asked why a zoning change is required for the 5400 France Avenue building. Mr. Larsen responded that general office use is not permitted in a zoned PCD-4. PCD -4's uses are for automobile service and car washes. Other neighborhood services would not be allowed in the district. Ms. Masica inquired whether Mr. Noonan would have any other use for the site. Ed Noonan, 4700 Merilane, said the site was his first choice for his office, but his bid was rejected. However, following acquisition of the 44th and France building, the owners of the 5400 France Avenue building accepted his offer. Mr. Noonan explained he has converted a similar. buil ding previously, which won awards from the City of Minneapolis. Member Hovland asked who the tenants would be at the 44th and France building. Mr. Noonan said temporarily Noonan, Construction will office in the lower level as the sole tenant. Mr. Hovland inquired what an appropriate tenant would be for the lower space when Noonan Construction moves out. Mr. Noonan said he has been approached by an insurance company and an accounting firm. Mr. Hovland asked what will become of the parking garage space when Noonan Construction vacates. Mr. Noonan explained the space has been re- engineered to accommodate 21 parking spaces and does not require any parking variances for retail or office use. Member Kelly made a motion to close the hearing. Member Masica seconded the motion. Ayes: Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold Motion carried. Member Kelly moved approval of'the proposed preliminary rezoning and First Reading of the following: ORDINANCE NO. 850-A19 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 850) BY REZONING PROPERTY TO PCD -1 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Subsection 850.06 of Section 850 of the Edina City Code is amended by adding the following thereto: Page 2 n Minutes/Edina City Council/May 1, 2001 "The extent of the Planned Commercial District, PCD -1 is enlarged by the addition iof the following property: Quarter of the That part of the North Half of the Northeast Quarter of the Northea st Northeast Quarter of Section 19, Township 28, Range 24, described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of said North Half of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section; thence South along the East line thereof 130.00 feet; thence West parallel with the North line thereof 138.00 feet; thence North parallel with the East line thereof 130.00 feet to the North line thereof; thence East along the North line 138.00 feet to the point of beginning; except the North 30.00 feet and except the East 33.00 feet taken for road purposes. And also: Commencing at a point 130.00 feet South of the Northeast corner of Section 19, Township 28, Range 24; thence West 138.00 feet; thence South 25.00 feet; thence east 138.00 feet, thence North 25.00 feet to the point of beginning. The extent of the PCD4, Planned Commercial District -4 is reduced by removing the property described above from the Planned Commercial District -4." Member Hovland seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold Motion carried. Is PRELIMINARY REZONING AND AMENDMENT TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE BANCOR GROUP INC. R -1 SINGLE DWELLING UNIT DISTRICT TO rCD 3 PLANNED RESIDENCE DISTRICT (4800 AND 4804 WEST 70th STREET) WITHDRAWN BY APPLICANT Mr. Hughes noted that a letter dated April 26, 2001, was received by the Planning Department withdrawing the application for R zoning and Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan for Bancor Group, 4800 and 4804 Wes No further action was taken. PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FOR P MOV D �aa �ENf Notice �Opresented, ESTATE (6512 VERNON AVENUE approved and ordered placed on file. Presentation by Planner Planner Larsen explained the proposed development is located at the northeasterly intersection of Vernon Avenue and Tamarac. The proposed development is approximately 6 acres and the home of Chapel Hills Church. The site was initially reviewed as a single dwelling. subdivision. It is now the intent of the developer to develop the property as a detached townhouse development. The proposal must be reviewed under the Planned Residence District (PRD) standards of the Zoning Ordinance. The proposal also requires amending the Comprehensive Plan from Quasi- Public to Low Density Attached Residential. Chapel Hills Church would retain ownership of Lot 1 and Outlot A of the proposed plat. putlot A includes one half of the proposed private street allowing the church access to the church after evelopment would be 3 3 acres street from a new curb cut. The lot size for the 3 J tae PLANNING COMMISSION CASE Z -01 -1 Applicant: Noonan Construction Company Location: 5400 France Avenue South Comprehensive Plan Designation: Commercial Existing Zoning: Planned Commercial District, PCD-4 Request: Final Rezoning from Planned Commercial District, PCD-4 to Planned Commercial District, PCD -1 History: Planning Commission Action: Preliminary rezoning on April 11, 2001 City Council Action: Preliminary rezoning to Planned Commercial District, PCD -1, on May 1, 2001. Final Plans: Final plans are essentially the same as those presented for preliminary approval. One garage stall will be converted to office space, and .the remaining stalls will be used for parking and storage. The exterior of the building will be brick with slate roof. The garage doors will be wood. At this writing the proponent has not submitted a landscaping plan. A landscaping plan is required prior to issuance of a building permit. Recommendation: The Plans presented are consistent with plans given preliminary approval. Staff recommends final rezoning subject to a staff approved landscaping plan. Attachments: Site plan, floor plan, and elevations. Sio�\,2s�di V'oo� r• ►': .'ice r r i \ l ' 1 - '` .� ZN ftG IN . ��. IS . \ \ ,�;� \\ .t1I-, i• - -. _ ,� \tom \._� •iis r� \ g ddpp r A9 Big Ud moth stmal 22nnvvp221.21N SM19 90m2 ({12)097.6101 Im (612) 0273101 2md0 2.e02.®mLmm STNS T � W i� LL Noonar Constructio Headquarter r AAA r--- — _ 1_un 11.A vv -T&- 5ITL PLAN . �� V'-.to' 0 1. L So (vo 4 1. P L.— - 4 L TFL__7 1X,S1'+(r Guuol. S7A— io RU+NJ 15xG1 FLC10)L PLgn1 818 28.1 Salk Streal 61188aapoS4 6W 88619 phew (618)887•SSIM r- (612) 827-5101 R—M Sroh2rGaol.eom I I I � NEwd W �NmNS I II I Il II 1 NEW tNTRho U (IL EST( -ew1 **ICL 6X6 1 ILX12 I I II 1 ® I I I LTA", T STh« T 6hPP.E o Rtnh,J 25x13 I I I t %11TJ6 6AaasL 1 STAw TO P-L nWd 25X13 I I Propose 1 � I IL Ib 20 i Noonal Constructic I Headquarte 5400 Fram Edina 554; M8rch l2. 2001 PM iml- ,PL F_ ---IF 79", 11 1 o�oRHkalr 19 x 112 -N�� - -- � - - _JL__JL ---- I�---- ��- - -- I eta II II ® — _3 L -- L - -- COLUA -S S -- IF-- -Ir - -- I p � s. 1 I I I II I Il II 1 NEW tNTRho U (IL EST( -ew1 **ICL 6X6 1 ILX12 I I II 1 ® I I I LTA", T STh« T 6hPP.E o Rtnh,J 25x13 I I I t %11TJ6 6AaasL 1 STAw TO P-L nWd 25X13 I I Propose 1 � I IL Ib 20 i Noonal Constructic I Headquarte 5400 Fram Edina 554; M8rch l2. 2001 PM iml- ,PL P REPORT /RECOMMENDATION � av% To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item: II. B. From: Craig Larsen Consent ❑ City Planner Information Only ❑ Date: June 19, 2001 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Action: ❑ Motion Final Rezoning, Final Plat, and ® Resolution Amendment to the ® Ordinance Comprehensive Plat for JMS, ❑ DISCUSSIOn Development and Thorpe Real Estate. 6512 Vernon Avenue Recommendation: The Planning Commission recommends: 1. Changing the Comprehensive Plan designation from Quasi - Public to Low Density Residential. 2. Final Rezoning from R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District to PRD -2, Planned Residence District 3. Final Plat approval for the Abby at Chapel Hill. The foregoing approvals should be conditioned on: 1. Executed Developer's Agreement 2. Subdivision dedication based on a raw land value of $722,000.00 3. Modification of landscaping plan to meet ordinance requirements,. and bond. Info /Background: The Watershed District granted permits for the project at their May 23, 2001, meeting. See attached Planning Commission minutes, staff report and plans. I DRAFT PC MINUTES MAY 30, 2001 S -01 -2 & Z -01 -2 JMS Equities and Thorpe Real Estate Comprehensive Plan 6512 Vernon Avenue Mr. Larsen informed the Council at their May 1, 2001, meeting met and approved a revised plan. The original proposal contained 13 units, with nine units fronting on a new cul de sac, and four units fronting on Tamarac Avenue. The plan approved by the City Council removed one of the lots on Tamarac Avenue. Mr. Larsen said no additional changes were ordered by Council. Mr. Larsen concluded staff recommends amending the Comprehensive Plan, and final rezoning and final plat approval conditioned on: 1. Developers Agreement 2. Subdivision Dedication based on a raw land value of $722,000.00. 3. Watershed District Permits 4. Modification of landscaping plan to meet ordinance requirements, plus landscaping bond. The proponent, Mr. Schoenwetter was present to respond to questions. Commissioner Swenson asked Mr. Larsen if he anticipates any problems with parking on Sunday mornings. Mr. Larsen said to date the City has not received any negative reports on parking at this site. Commissioner Swenson asked Mr. Larsen if he believes guest parking is adequate. Mr. Larsen said guest parking would occur on the street and in the driveways, similar to other residential neighborhoods where a church is present. Commissioner McClelland noted the church and church membership is not large, adding she does not believe parking will be an issue. Commissioner Ingwalson asked Mr. Schoenwetter if the prices vary between the proposed homes on TamaracAvenue and on the cul -de -sac. Mr. Schoenwetter responded the base price for all buildings will be the same. Added amenities, and square footage will change the price of each unit. Mr. Schoenwetter said he believes the average price of the homes will be in the 400 thousand plus range. Commissioner McClelland moved to recommend final rezoning, final plat and amendment to the Comprehensive Plan subject to: 1. Developers Agreement 2. Subdivision Dedication based on a raw land value of $722,000.00 3. Watershed District Permits 4. Modification of landscaping plan to meet ordinance requirements, plus landscaping bond. Commissioner Lonsbury seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. LOCATION MAP G FORD CT IV; IGIA110NAL Olson In REZONING & SUBDIVISION NUMBER Z-01-2 and S-01-2 L O C A T 10 N 6512 Vernon Avenue REQUEST 12 unit planed residence development EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT Minutes /Edina City Council/May 1, 2001 1 addition "The ex That part of the North Half of the Northeast Quarter of the Nort uarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 19, Township 28, Range 24, describe ows: Commencing at the Northeast, corner of said North f the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the Northea er of said Section; thence South along the East line thereof 130.0 ;hence West parallel with the North line thereof 138.00 feet; then c h parallel with the East line .11 thereof 130.00 feet to the North line t ; thence East along the North line 138.00 feet to the point of begin except the North 30.00 feet and except the East 33.00 feet taken for r - poses. And also: Commencing at a po' .00 feet South of the Northeast corner of Section 19, Township 28, a 24; thence West 138.00 feet; thence South 25.00 feet; thence east 138 et, thence North 25.00 feet to the point of beginning. The extent of th -4, Planned Commercial District -4 is reduced by removing the property descr above from the Planned Commercial District -4." Member Hovland seconded th `on. Rollcall: Ayes- land, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold M carried. ® LIMINARY REZONING AND AMENDMENT TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR HE BANCOR GROUP INC. R -1 SINGLE DWELLING UNIT DISTRICT TO PCD 3 PLANNED RESIDENCE DISTRICT (4800 AND 4804 WEST 701h STREET) WITHDRAWN BY APPLICANT Mr. Hughes noted that a letter dated April 26, 2001, was received by the Planning Department withdrawing the application for the Preliminary Rezoning and Amendment to the Comprehensive P West 70th Street. taken. PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL FApPROVED Affidavits of Notice werOepresented, ESTATE (6512 VERNON AVENUE) approved and ordered placed on file. Presentation by Planner Planner Larsen explained the proposed development is located at the northeasterly intersection of Vernon Avenue and Tamarac. The proposed development is approximately 6 acres and the home of Chapel Hills Church. The site was initially reviewed as a single dwelling .subdivision. It is now the intent of the ust be reviewed under property the Planned detached townhouse development. The proposal Residence District (PRD) standards of the Zoning Ordinance. 'The proposal also requires amending the Comprehensive Plan from Quasi-Public to Low 1 and Outlot Density A of the proposed plat. h would retail ownership Chapel Hills Church Outlot A includes one half of the proposed private church after development would be 3 3 acres street from a new curb cut. The lot size for the Page 3 Minutes/Edina City Council/May 1, 2001 1 which meets the 3 acre minimum lot size for a church. Mr. Larsen .added that no variances are being requested. The PRD -2 district requires 7,200 square feet of .lot area per dwelling unit. The development proposes fourteen. dwelling units in a townhouse style of development meaning each unit has an individual lot. Nine of the units would be serviced from a private cul -de -sac off Vernon Avenue and four units would front on Tamarac. The proposed development provides 9,650 square feet of lot area per unit. Maximum building coverage is limited to. 25 percent. The building coverage proposed is 20 percent. The only variances requested are for sideyard setbacks on lots 9.and 10..Interior sideyard setback in the PRD -2 district is 20 feet. These two lots provide no setback from Outlot A. Mr. Larsen added the lots do meet the setback requirement from the church property line. Mr. Larsen explained that the: Planning Commission recommended two Council actions, 1) changing the Comprehensive Plan designation from Single Family to Low Density Residential, and 2), approving the Preliminary Rezoning from R -1, PRD -3, Planned Residence District -3, subject to the four conditions; 1) Final Rezoning, 2) Final Plat - Approval, 3) Developer's Agreement, 4) Watershed District Permits. Council comment Member Masica inquired if pictures of the proposed townhomes were available. Mr. Larsen responded that the developer may have pictures. Member Masica voiced concern that the homes might have a 'cookie- cutter' look. Mr. Larsen said while the footprint may be similar, . the units will have variations, both inside and outside. Member Kelly asked if the immediately adjacent properties are all zoned R -1. Mr. Larsen said all the homes that are on the north, west and. south are traditional single family. There are double homes to the northeast. Member Hovland asked if guest parking is included in the cul -de -sac. Mr. Larsen replied, guest parking would need to be on the driveways of the individual units. Extra parking might be allowed on one side of the sixteen foot street along Tamarac. Mr. Hovland asked if staff was satisfied with the landscape plan as presented. Mr. Larsen said the plan was only a concept. Mr. Hovland asked if after the City Engineer approved the drainage plan if additional abatements were considered with the new development. Engineer Hoffman said originally water drained to a catch basin, but will now be. held in a pond and discharged at a slower rate. Mr. Hovland added this sounds like a positive .thing for the single family homes in the area. Mr. Hoffman concurred. Mayor Maetzold inquired whether the street could be posted for NO PARKING even thought it is not a public street. Mr. Larsen said yes it can be posted. 'Develo er's comments Jeff Schoenwetter, 5232 Ridgewood Drive, explained Chapel Hills Church decided to sell some of their property with the help of Edina Realty. Twenty -eight requests for proposals Page 4 Minutes/Edina City. Council/May 1, 2001 i were sent out and fifteen responded. The Church Council selected three finalists and JMS was selected to move forward with their proposal. The Church's objectives were to create a compatible project with the existing neighborhood, a land but since they not expect to expand family dwellings. The church will retain 3.3 their church home, they have offered the land for sale. The proposed plat solidifies solutions for existing drainage problems, and facilitates the needs of the church. Mr. Schoenwetter introduced the JMS development team. Sam Thorpe, a third generation Edina developer, resident and Mr. Schoenwetter's partner and Mr. Plagemann, Engineer and partner who also resides in Edina. He explained JMS specialty is single family homes. The proposed development is 'turn-key' meaning it will have an association which assures maintenance of the homes and neighborhood. The homes are cottage inspired, have options for universal design and could be considered transitional housing which is in higher demand in Edina. Mr. Schoenwetter said the most important concept is that the units are custom and have three floor plans that fit within the footprint. The subject area is a mixed use area with predominantly twin homes, some single family homes, condominiums and apartment houses. Mr. Schoenwetter added the plan unanimously approved by the neighborhood eliminates a curb -cut allowing church traffic access through the cul -de -sac. Mr. Schoenwetter said single side street parking is being suggested and he pointed out each home has two driveway parking spots. Mr. Schoenwetter said neighbors on Tamarac asked what would happen if only three homes were built and 10 homes on the cul -de -sac. He said the most significant difference would be that Outlot C would become smaller. Most trees on the site will remain intact. Mr. Schoenwetter explained the variety of space uses for the cottage style home footprints. He stated there is a great demand for this type of life -cycle housing. Following meetings with the neighborhood, residents expressed that the plan bolsters their confidence to improve their homes. Public Comment Mark Brauer, 2006 Girard Avenue, explained that Chapel Hills Church has been part of the community for forty years and they want to be good stewards of the land. The Church would like to convert their excess land into something that would generate funds for maintenance of their church. Don Kennedy, 5928 Tamarac, stated he lnhree houses on Tamarac fits best into the proposed development. Mr. Kennedy said in his opinion neighborhood and he asked that the Council ensure no more than three houses are approved for Tamarac. Dick Bastyr, 6504 Aspen Road, said he understood the concern of Tamarac residents, but also ld expressed concern that pushing the "extra house" s pP supported four homes on T development amarac and adversely affect Aspen Road residents. Mr. B tyr nine homes on the cul -de -sac. Page 5 Minutes/Edina City Council/May 1, 2001 1 Bill Peria, 5932 Tamarac, said a simple solution to the issue would be to reduce the. total number in the development by one with three on Tamarac and nine on Aspen. Scott Johnson, 7115 Tupa Drive, said he is a 40 -year member of Chapel Hills Church. Mr. Johnson said the points raised by neighbors were also raised at the Planning Commission meeting. He noted the developer needs 13 units to make the development feasible. Mr. Johnson urged the Council to support the Planning Commission's recommendation and approve the proposal as submitted. Member Hovland inquired what costs would be affected if approval were granted for three homes on Tamarac and nine on the cul -de -sac. Mr. Schoenwetter said pricing would be pro- rated among the approved number of lots. Mr. Hovland asked the difference with the four to five ratio compared to the four to four ration of back -to -back homes. Mr. Schoenwetter explained the adjustments made to the cul -de -sac and entrance space to accommodate both scenarios. Member Kelly made a motion to close the hearing. Member Masica seconded the motion. Ayes: Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold Motion carried. Council comment Member Kelly stated he did not favor additional lots on the cul -de -sac as it compromises the appearance of the site. He believes that removing one home on Tamarac would not be a hardship for the developer and he encouraged approval of nine lots on the cul -de -sac. Uniformity in the area, in his opinion, is extremely important. Mr. Kelly stated his concurrence with the plan as reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission (four homes on Tamarac and nine on the cul -de -sac) or reduce the total development by one lot on Tamarac. Member Hovland said there is a demand in Edina for housing of this type, and thanked the developer for the proposal. He said he favored three homes on Tamarac. He asked the developer what would happen if 10 units in the development were approved and asked for a comparison with Olde Vernon. Mr. Schoenwetter deferred to Planner Larsen as he is not familiar with Olde Vernon. Mr. Larsen explained the sideyard setbacks at Olde Vernon are as little as five feet with a building separation of ten feet. Mr. Hovland asked if 10 units were approved for the main development, what would the sideyard setbacks be. Mr. Larsen said staff has not reviewed that scenario. Mr. Hovland commented that this proposal would not have as much building mass as Olde Vernon. Member Masica indicated that 1) the drainage plan is very good; and 2) there is a real need for this type of housing. She voiced objection to the 'cookie cutter' type of construction, but the changes in the exterior look will help that. Ms. Masica favors three homes on Tamarac and nine units on the cul -de -sac. Page 6 Minutes/Edina City Council/May 1, 2001 _l Mayor Maetzold voiced agreement with the nine unit concept and three units on Tamarac. He explained it appears that the Council will approve the three units on Tamarac and nine on the cul -de -sac and he asked for an opinion by the developer. Mr: Schoenwetter said if he were given more design flexibility, the Council's vision of custom homes on the three lots could be realized. Member Kelly reiterated that larger does not mean variances on the lots. Mr. Larsen explained the intent of this type of zoning is to gather a uniform product with some cohesiveness as to size and design which is probably inevitable considering the area believes the Council is envisioning is that there will be and site. Mr. Kelly said what he proportionate increases in the sizes of the Tamarac lots but still maintain consistency in the proportional relationship between the size of the unit and the size of the lot. Mr. Hughes said the action necessary would be to grant preliminary approval with conditions to be reflected in the final development plan which would go back to the Planning Commission and back to the Council in due course. Member Kelly made a motion to grant preliminary approval to JMS Development and Thorpe Real Estate subject to the following changes from the plan approved by the Planning Commission: 1) the number of lots be reduced from thirteen to twelve, 2) the three lots facing on Tamarac footprint be increased proportionately with the size of lot size. Member Hovland seconded the motion. Member Kelly withdrew the motion. Member Hovland withdrew the second. Member Kelly made a motion to grant first reading to Ordinance No. 850 -A20 rezoning the property as proposed and granting preliminary approval to JMS Development and Thorpe Real Estate subject to the following changes to the previously approved Planning Commission plan: 1) the number of lots be reduced from thirteen to twelve, 2) the proposed lots facing on Tamarac be reduced by one, 3) the footprint for the building of the lots on Tamarac be permitted to increase proportionately with the increase of the lots size. ORDINANCE NO. 850-A20 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 850) BY REZONING PROPERTY TO PRD -2 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Subsection 850.06 of Section 850. of the Edina City Code is amended by adding the following thereto: "The extent of the Planned Residential District, PRD -2 is enlarged by the addition of the following property: That part of Lot 1, Block 1, Gleason First Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying east of the westerly 110 feet thereof and that part of the ® westerly 110 feet of said Lot 1, lying so uth of the north ten feet thereof. The extent of the R -1 Single Dwelling District is reduced by removing the property described above." Member Hovland seconded the motion. Page 7 Minutes/Edina City Council/May 1, 2001 Rollcall: Ayes: Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold Motion carried. Member Kelly introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2001-28 AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that the Comprehensive Plan of the. City be amended by changing the ,designation from Single Family to Low Density Residential.for the property described as: That part of Lot 1, Block 1, Gleason First Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying east of the westerly 110 feet thereof and that part of the westerly 110 feet of said Lot 1, lying south of the north ten feet thereof. Adopted this 1st day of May, 2001. Member Hovland seconded the motion. . Rollcall: Ayes: Hovland, Kelly, Masica, Maetzold Motion carried. *HEARING DATE SET OF MAY 15 2001 FOR PLANNING MATTERS Motion made by Member Hovland and seconded by Member Masica sett ing May 15, 2001, as hearing date for the following planning matters: 1. Preliminary Plat Approval. Grandview Square 2nd Addition, Phase II. Generally located south of Eden Avenue and east of Vernon Avenue; 2. Amend Zoning Ordinance. Amend Ordinance allowing state licensed currency exchanges in certain zoning districts. Motion carried on rollcall vote- four ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR AQUATIC VEGETATION CONTROL SERVICES. Motion made by Member Hovland and seconded by Member Masica for award of bid for aquatic vegetation control services to recommended low bidder, Lake Restoration, Inc., at $19,341.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. OFF -LEASH DOG PARK REPORT PRESENTED Director Keprios explained that at a previous meeting, the Council directed staff to conduct a study to determine if there was a reasonable site for an off -leash dog park within the City. Ingraham and Associates were hired to study the issue and worked with staff to look at potential sites for a suitable off -leash dog park in addition to the one planned at the Minneapolis Public Works site on France Avenue. Mr. Ingraham identified four potential areas: 1) Creek Valley Park (near water tower), 2) Braemar Park (site of former gun range), 3) Walnut Ridge Park (within south end of pathway), and 4) Van Valkenburg Park (around holding pond). so Mr. Ingraham presented his findings at' the April 10, 2001, Park Board meeting. He elaborated that none of the four sites was ideal for an off -leash dog park site. Walnut Ridge Page 8 rk O, PLANNING COMMISSION CASE S -01 -2 & Z -01 -2 Applicant: JMS Equities, Inc. and Thorpe Real Estate Location: 6512 Vernon Avenue Comprehensive Plan Designation: Quasi - public Zoning: R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District Request: Change Comprehensive Plan Designation to Low Density Residential. Rezoning of property to Planned Residence District, PRD -2. Approval of plat for The Abby at Chapel Hill. Background: The City Council approved preliminary plans for this development at their May 1, 2001, meeting. Originally, the proposal contained 13 units, with nine units fronting on a new cul de sac, and four units fronting on Tamarac. The plan approved by the Council removed one of the lots fronting on Tamarac Avenue. No additional changes were ordered by Council. Final Plans: The proponent has now submitted plans in support of their request for final rezoning and final plat approval. Plans presented include a revised site plan, revised grading plan, landscaping plan, floor plans, and building elevations. The site plan illustrates the 12 lots approved by Council. The individual house pads on Tamarac are now 45 feet wide compared to the 30 foot width of homes on the cul de sax. Grading plans have been revised in response to comments by the Watershed District Engineer. The landscaping plan exceeds ordinance requirements for the number of over -story trees. However, the plan does no indicate the species. It also suggests conifers below the minimum height of six feet. The plans include three styles of homes for the nine lots on the cul de sac. All are 30 feet wide. There are three architecturally similar plans for the lots on Tamarac. Recommendation: The plans presented meet the requirements for final rezoning, and incorporate the changes ordered by the Council. Staff recommends amending the Comprehensive Plan, and final rezoning and final plat approval conditioned on: 1. Developers Agreement 2. Subdivision Dedication based on a raw land value of $722,000.00 3. Watershed District Permits 4. Modification of landscaping plan to meet ordinance requirements, plus landscaping bond. Attachments: 1. Site Pan 2. Grading Plan 3. Utility Plan 4. Landscape Plan 5. Elevations 6. Floor Plans I k- flo,HC-5 'Foe v-- i ft-Wi too, �t IMMIA M NIA f a § � � ��.r 4 f r' A o � G 11 12 ep de: LEFT ELEVATION erws. Va -r RA? wrlljrolma•o BACK ELEVATION YAi,Vm'•1• 121Gif ELEVATION m R PONDS 1s,oun.ae �Xfl71R�R'ip1AYLR5W Q9Qb 121940 �� MINNff-ONKA n�51GN, ING, R�PK �a .a JM5 NOM�S, INC. /aow.ec„erva>,r » ooeuru wr eucx rarxn 1tl�.f1N MM. RA•LS.dZVAfM. XCn"1 o arwneeuesoca�sslw"fv w FMVAW zrs w.rt. se=r rcottnanecemsnlePrcmmrma 60 W. lath. 5L, 5Wta 210 s,�r.ow:se vra�leo 292 1 NvMVSwmsee� »axne�NLwG GIB MN "V7 rARJM1'ZPPONPll'JWL FlJNNMlt O afffA?aROaIEN.MISIR N= M<952) 9r4-7�4A0 FAX("2> 9M-44 a -ffig. m"&P WAA- m WN& M J QO�b•� E. Q/f WI< NMAM'WV*i MMYTR. om Wolow pMeNMriM RNA „POI see. P a 6 FLM No WOO" wrA¢er ant�m rogw -C wwSOWOLDLTJ b "MI.M Dee 914 1 /O" RAR Hmar Mir ec v.a v 4•.r ~90. M. ISM. NCI 9¢r 4 Or RSV-Mn ru,. *W MAI�W rQW,QGNW 9Q.V 0.0936� OCIVAMNJOM r1101 rL.ciyMrbr� t,oa 90. M. Orww," seer 4 Oro F.M NO.00S004 y 9'S" LEFT ELEVATION XAR.110 -1, _ Qxw vwl*bimav n Q0 RIGHT ELEVATION PRONE ELEVATION cm WK cvu ,0"2 *m , P95 AMM5NoaTow is5tmNcz ams 1,a zmcnrn aowv0a+a o� COMCE°M MO � MiNwfoNr..A o< e� �, ,Oa»O." �� �� JM5 NOM�S, INC. Noes ii�51GN, INC. YA X aMnea+o6ao�aao�0 'aro5aa 9:9 ye, 80 W. 78th, 56., Su*e 210 , M14 55317 o lrt(952) 934 -7440 r-AX (952) 944 -+4305 e-RW: mFkaJft4**&Axm ; TWA, MN s 6R 9D3 NMBRY'JOEDO/lle WYS. W.e. 5P9" B "roueo CLNG MWt I •. 2+ � 20^Ye'rarc.,'i/. i N" Y e' fA.IL..4 i Y I w,iC. '. CAWS I I � � f3AIF1 0 i i ,• � I UNEXCAVAIVV user CIO" 6 "ICIRDCAC.Om I ... 1r1311Df elf "0 /C i 2o•�ia oar.rm � � � I I I I I .•� I ,..cow- 2O" Y B" HG. f' 9A�Y7 OL IT' 'QRG COW... WNA 20"Ye'CQY."a J yqr ,.y' . • --*-"-c a,a,W 1110— MCCN. a rouaclo w.rwi I .; r .. m o'mnni S 20" Y a•• CAW. M]. r xov.J%w+ s FAMILY ROOM ° orwx f BEDROOM UNEx, i S. wa' Yu-f• I I i : `�,l � � wr.awss P. ramp taut. W" 2o'•Ya- CAW..fG. I — 5•� r 49' 2?40' H 9' 97 6T4' � ►ACwrzsni..snner�e�m MOM.Wr+wmSaae�.oen� stiriet+u.ions kve fmawv#Vm secs s4oh 2.2Y,o ICMCe.xY% It a "Wv oneeNx) I 5 I M. Ia+e I 4 i I y0a+[if W/. C.7G11RNy. l�K SC.%Z, I /4—l' G 260.K.0PI.RtllD 12Vl4P fiOQ slw of f p.m NO. 005aff � IN9rwtcsnu snr R/66N'(D rauo6Ylw wm sno aam6a 9mwn+.nts.s e6rsvw IwaoenxY69ow acts anw6 2-2 Y 0011 VM 1Mx-ll c l.w"NOM ODEM"s) t 5 aNi n. m.e9ON m Is" oc. 9A�JG'AAEPff FLAN 9'06 30.1'I.Qf. r0CiC0 9061" 0.60.0 *wr cr 9 ft— W.<x:me 9 T4' H.�. B'i" yam. M'6'• Y' — — — — — — — --- — — — — — --- — — — — — 0. L.-I. ' @• ratan cow.*ftL •xe�cRX.rc u91a n i Y W.IG.�, ° L/I.. \§ arnoN (!AC( y � v $ PATH e ' H.cAwv UNEXGAVAIEIJ -- - slim- 6'•►A6OLOY. 019 10'•ratanGONC.wAL { I1'' 111 — 9r1011DS N "O /G RP�J�¢ (27 19/ 1" Y II •I / @• 10'_G s �RmGTgt - 9�a1 - -. _. aL = — =4 VIM W- of L r' ra = ap6G o" "<Oc. aw �. .. IV ro"co l Ytl61 I, 30•' Y @' fAY. rit'a 6' ADYY LL J9.41 •-I° 9•a° �.,�„ �._ o/c - — — — — — — — — — — are sncs.le^ °rrte'°R — r — — — —b — r MECH. —j t V p ? d b-� GAY. rre. z• M91 AaON I 6 K QKiIK u h FAMILY ROOM ° ar6Ytw� 1�• s - te r' "' DePROOM H��,• %11•'•• fi .� -UNEX. . ," � � 1 awv � n �, � wr.awsstxa<. . @• raaoca.Y.xN.I. sa x @ rat rra — y y 274(Y" It w4' ,n'-f 61'1" � IN9rwtcsnu snr R/66N'(D rauo6Ylw wm sno aam6a 9mwn+.nts.s e6rsvw IwaoenxY69ow acts anw6 2-2 Y 0011 VM 1Mx-ll c l.w"NOM ODEM"s) t 5 aNi n. m.e9ON m Is" oc. 9A�JG'AAEPff FLAN 9'06 30.1'I.Qf. r0CiC0 9061" 0.60.0 *wr cr 9 ft— W.<x:me 9 wrwme n SW OMPM Y W rawArM v ea.V a.oa� CCMRN JMM wvevH Nwawwrebw sees awe+ a b wlvm Mrx <uusswwonee+ex> W4 iie.-nw"Adw FDOT FLOOR mm xxd v+^ -r rxe so. n. RNRD 54Q y(H or 0 •°race nuswM.n v POLW OJw saaOLOo enwm .uers MANM RIMOM V NIM VT4C arww s- z :wlerceR++.rx (LPA&" ruav onanas> Lm o ewer --4-- I. s-& 1 i L s t .5.6" L 01'91 m• V-4 1 /e•• nwrtlen+r F 15T FLOOR PLM srxn v +•• -�' e•B lO..T. lLvtw: svGa 9Q� +P 4 nN+r+o. aGetl60 II•101Y_t9 MGVR ZOfTIY.M — II � a.es..�. 1 vwr 1v M. BATH 1 MA5TeR BEtJtZ M s a ` r-l• -0 r IY YIS'f• � 'n'•VNJIY 1 CJY�T I xi '9 � I I •fM-1 ® ® � 1 • � w/ J.�OIi — 0 Q. N .. a b rww lrl.rawa l+oe ,'. I Lo� 5..r. mrvulr ww7'►x aviroen..a - S° y — — — J °"rs h :� lilt =.' IC..m MOVl 1I ��ICBRS wwva iI�ATROOM "1 Fo-IIM• FOB �I 7 e' '° womw 171NING n N'�, ' a_ s gTCHEN � � wcly °• I ` � .1 I p R i '��wowiO• - I 1 I $ 1+ I fp n sx - m y ® ' J�i Tz I ' h •R — — sw r I 1 Lm o ewer --4-- I. s-& 1 i L s t .5.6" L 01'91 m• V-4 1 /e•• nwrtlen+r F 15T FLOOR PLM srxn v +•• -�' e•B lO..T. lLvtw: svGa 9Q� +P 4 nN+r+o. aGetl60 LZFr ELEVATION W"ZKFA VtWiAYL/ 5 W IZIO& ernsto$=af acaaax+ MWO a (Aft"b At C%IWAOa ND / Or oMAK MDT %901YAMOtO. u ' M7Ei RTALi tItVATbe. YLLIG6 MD naaL nwe ND M'1RY w!E naEA N.A N can[xn[ma x nsiat 0 MARrOr caar e OcaE a i nAmi4 DEitb'L! %aWREOride ranLrre o nen�r,nTmn+LrAae a cat ecwuas At wu, et- OXf DOS N=:!'A]ZD OM at MW[. PACK ELEVATION mcmf ELEVATION srxu ve ° -r MINWfONKA 19�516N, INC. 80 W. 78th, 5t.. 5uu 210 Chwiasxn. AAN 55'x19 IM ( 952) 9' 4 -9440 OX ( 952) 9" --005 e-mai: mdLmo &WW& Jan LtmtNm fQ[. LOr Imorx I fgMY: to Z"4 PrVcLQKM a mer*msa Orr. arAQ evw& h�N JM5 HOW5, INC. IM PPJNMr•ON 5 [pt.Itb 1:- 19.�LJ Q�ppp ' -�LQ RYOI.K xws n •r. am AS NO2D 333 � wA.LraAw+ O G0�8G9 6 6T-r 5 -a, m "f L W-+• rarc PLLa SIIDR ra rcvanrcs. am sa.o vwnm4 R MaN JOW5 NICAI N1L701V "Xvw SRcs: O1 19 f IO M'JRf MICA s wt» wRO onesN+s� M R �I �I I OFTIONAL 3 CAR C*WAr4r- BASEMENT MAN Na150. H.OHIpK IrJ'JCD avysv sioa sar5Q6 Z4' - 10'-Y" b• H'•T' Y' b�- i'— I zo l�l � � I I I I I F e �� f' — .' I .. t� I Y•raiwvaxae . a — — — — — — — r•rars scam 'r ra,:o cwr. wni — — — — — — — — — — I — -� f .4R yw, 5„� � •� RR[tUt Y @Y� ia�ia / + ". Y9 Y$ v wwns Ra. S -- ! r. — — — — — wllws pi• MroWOC —M&1 V,d 5 91' k H' ri1W.Y� COM — — e•• rwaa car. Nrna Q•Ip exeRcl% ROOM anc*4A I e naavaar.wn+ Lcc I a� . 7 Y a rasro cw+c. wiu o r. romp Qc. NN/L ° ao•,s•car.HG. omrLtwaataw.0 WAU c^ za• x a•• rrsic. r.c ' p ti I FAMILY RDOM 4 L J 51' "'• 9 it I I "°Qf � li i i� .16 'I � I. ! I u ^,e"cJar Ha .I i aa•,e ^cwr.rra I I cn 1i A55A4 _ 1 .. I r I W.I at I I 1o••,e ^cx..r4 ! I ! — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — ®° I I °- w•rorva I �s• , DATH ' VWPOOM J) $.., 21 ,n,.us ! UNEYGCAVAMP? - - - -- — — — — — - — CAIM m "f L W-+• rarc PLLa SIIDR ra rcvanrcs. am sa.o vwnm4 R MaN JOW5 NICAI N1L701V "Xvw SRcs: O1 19 f IO M'JRf MICA s wt» wRO onesN+s� M R �I �I I OFTIONAL 3 CAR C*WAr4r- BASEMENT MAN Na150. H.OHIpK IrJ'JCD avysv sioa sar5Q6 b�- i'— I zo l�l � � I I I I I F e �� �- za• r e•• car. r��. � J .' I N II r•rars scam 'r ra,:o cwr. wni — — — — — — — — — — I — -� f .4R yw, 5„� � •� RR[tUt Y @Y� ia�ia / + ". Y9 Y$ v wwns Ra. S -- ! — — — — — wllws pi• MroWOC —M&1 V,d 5 91' k H' ri1W.Y� COM — — — — —I Q•Ip exeRcl% ROOM anc*4A I e naavaar.wn+ Lcc I a� . 7 Y I 1 I I I u�Ex. I 1 o r. romp Qc. NN/L ° ao•,s•car.HG. omrLtwaataw.0 WAU c^ za• x a•• rrsic. r.c ' p ti I FAMILY RDOM 4 L J 51' "'• 9 it I I "°Qf � li i i� .16 'I � I. I I I aa•,e ^cwr.rra I I cn 1i A55A4 _ 1 .. I y _ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — m "f L W-+• rarc PLLa SIIDR ra rcvanrcs. am sa.o vwnm4 R MaN JOW5 NICAI N1L701V "Xvw SRcs: O1 19 f IO M'JRf MICA s wt» wRO onesN+s� M R �I �I I OFTIONAL 3 CAR C*WAr4r- BASEMENT MAN Na150. H.OHIpK IrJ'JCD avysv sioa sar5Q6 PA5 ACH MAN „01a '}R 19P0 /yN 10 GOfB09 i I - R PO f A 'LLL SAD W OLC K /QWAII jc �M0130.00.GGf1Yi - .OENRLM.psA SMC$ AIR.�fI M�.RTV �irK59AY+ (YLt"N 000cmms) fIP.Sf FL0012 FLAN acne _ .mvmp 0-10-0 " . tmr.cr O -RAM YO.OmB65 v-i o i o• nwm ewe FII!55f FLOOR FLAN sxe�v.•• -�• moo• sa0-r swr A Q M—W Cox cce�rgo rnr«v onsarac 1� W 1'OZNi1 +'R ►aG „p W A 0 1A ( NO--r6 +Ip1a1LV1.0 /I Y.O [a w6iavo GLGI %swwi f T7.- aawalC laL -L W06 62" Mcnawwwvau+rw.n ucaa r.aawm a+�sv o r-s w,« Icwwv+ o+aaarm ws in+sanauc ■ f dr.R .$.K Y I .6 .9-Z .i'.N .lr,4 Mc 000an � I. 9 GE) �I I# WOO21Q�4] lash r 8 L # wo0wao as +c+ ►s . ► Y & au .701. - C h ip1a�gv�s� saa aaas .s � of I — i p A9 a+ c Tfr�n fMl ..L.t -.GI lul acs uuaa� I a+owc •moon avis+lm � atolcc .E.S +iaN) •Z_,q c ,o-.cl �# WOOW*a +aaln ' 7r�3�,rTL�T' I KaTJV � Iq ,4 L2WJ J1.9 .iA1 .Z -d dr.R 11,,11 wya w Y I m � I. 9 a r 11,,11 wya w J, nr c. ^nib• /v ern aV ;isZ tarn •nl rr,nar I Ln.✓+.JV•• va.Lrv.Jv • I .:C L.vi •u nuiir r rur • I I I I I I I I AWIM I I I I - - -T71 is �I yI I C) \) I I I - - -T) e� L.Ir I i I J Fr » I I y.. i nn•rrnuI •�i'vh•n . '+ ✓ ✓r•rV••I I .I I I I I I 1 I 12 I �. a� 2 y l 6 I 5 r - -- 7 —L �- A tl �.I �Y-1 A /I // a > % I I v I \ /VI I I /// 4 /' / F I � I e I C THE ABBEY } AT CHAPEL HILL v I , \ i / I L - -__ — ` 1 j/ / r- - - - - -� I '!, • OU710T B, �/ 3 �� I 1 0 `. ` I I I 2 III 8 �• � xx"WnWX N_ u,l ---------- wmmci„a------- - - - -T_ Trarar OUTLOT A s ° �( r I tiers- v+em•— � I I..,' /// -- I u /• 1` A I / 1 rl rl t/ n I r L/ L/ / / / IJ v 7 / OUTL.OT C / \ � I 1 Jan // 1 L / NORTH o a b km I � I ' / 1 • \ I � / Lei •+ V ^ L7 \ ka -' a / / yk� • \ DRAINAGE \ ` AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: ' \ v C NO SCALE } BEING 5 FEET IN WIDTH. UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. AND ADJOINING LOT LINES. AND 10 FEET IN WIDTH, UNLESS OTHERNISE INDICATED, AND ADJOINING RIGHT -OF -WAY LINES AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT. KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That JMS Homes Inc., o Minnesota corporation, owner and proprietor, and Chapel Hits United Church of Christ, a Minnesota non - profit organization, fee owner of the following described properly situated in the County of Hennepin. Stale of Minnesota, to wit: Lot 1, Block 1. GLEASON FIRST ADDITION, according to the rcorded plot thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, except the north 10.00 feet of the west 110.00 feel of said Lot 1. Have caused the some to be surveyed and platted as THE ABBEY AT CHAPEL HILL and do hereby donate and dedicate to the public for the public use forever the easements as shown on this plot for drainage end.ulilily purposes only. In witness whereof said JAS Homes Inc, a Minnesota Corporation, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this day of 2001. In witness wherof sold Chapel Hills United Church of Christ, a Minnesota non -profit organization, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this day of 2001. Signed. JAS HOMES INC. Signed: CHAPEL HILLS UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST Jeffrey M. Sehoenwetler, President President STATE OF COUNTY OF The foreaanq instrument was ocknowl edged before me this y deHrey tiE Sd+oerrwaTter. President of JMS Homes Vic.. a Ynneso Cap�ro oars. on d o sod r oT'gn- . Not Public. County' My Commission apr STATE CONTY OF The foregoing Instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2001 by President of Chapel Hills United Church of Christ, a Minnesota non -profit organization. an behalf of odd corporation. Nolory�ublic, County' My Commission Expires: I hereby certify that 1 have surveyed and platted the property described on this plot as THE ABBEY AT CHAPEL HILL: that this plot is o correct representation of the survey: that all distances are correctly shown On the plot in feel and hundredths of o foot: that all monuments have been correctly placed in the ground oa shown• that the outside boundary lines are correctly designated on the plot and that there are no wet lands os defined In MS 505.02, Subd. 1 or Public Highways highways to be designated other than as shown. Gregory R. Prosch, L.ond Surveyor Ynnesoto License Number 24982 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foreaDi Surve s Certificate Certificate was acknowledged before me this day of 2001, by Gregory R. Froseh, iond Surveyor, Minnesota License No. 24992. Notary Public, _ County, Minnesota Yy Lommtssion xPe EDINA, MINNESOTA This plot of THE ABBEY AT CHAPEL HILL was approved and accepted by the City Council of Edna. Minnesota. of o meeting held this day of 21101. M applicable. the written comments end recommendations of the Commissioner of Transportation and the County Highway Engineer have been received by, the City or the prescribed 30 Wool period has elapsed without receipt of such comments and recommendations. as provided by Minnesota Statutes. Section S ool Subdivision 2. CITY COUNCIL OF MINNETRISTA, MINNESOTA Mayor TAXPAYER SERVICES DIVISION Hennepin County, Minnesota I hereby certify that taxes payable in plot. Doled this day of Patrick H. O'Connor. Hennepin County Auditor by. Clerk and prior years have been paid for land described on this 2001. SURVEY SECTION Hennepin Countyy, Minnesota Pursuenl to MILAN. STAT. Sec 3838.565 (1969), this plot has been approved this Gary F. Caswell, Hennepin County Surveyor by. Deputy day of 2001. COUNTY RECORDER Hennepin County, Minnesota thereby certify that the within plot of HASELOW ADDITION was fled n this office this day of 2001. at _o dock _M. R. Dan. Carlson. County Recorder by. Deputy LOT SURVEYS L'OMRANY, INC. / / \ C NO SCALE } BEING 5 FEET IN WIDTH. UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. AND ADJOINING LOT LINES. AND 10 FEET IN WIDTH, UNLESS OTHERNISE INDICATED, AND ADJOINING RIGHT -OF -WAY LINES AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT. KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That JMS Homes Inc., o Minnesota corporation, owner and proprietor, and Chapel Hits United Church of Christ, a Minnesota non - profit organization, fee owner of the following described properly situated in the County of Hennepin. Stale of Minnesota, to wit: Lot 1, Block 1. GLEASON FIRST ADDITION, according to the rcorded plot thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, except the north 10.00 feet of the west 110.00 feel of said Lot 1. Have caused the some to be surveyed and platted as THE ABBEY AT CHAPEL HILL and do hereby donate and dedicate to the public for the public use forever the easements as shown on this plot for drainage end.ulilily purposes only. In witness whereof said JAS Homes Inc, a Minnesota Corporation, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this day of 2001. In witness wherof sold Chapel Hills United Church of Christ, a Minnesota non -profit organization, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this day of 2001. Signed. JAS HOMES INC. Signed: CHAPEL HILLS UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST Jeffrey M. Sehoenwetler, President President STATE OF COUNTY OF The foreaanq instrument was ocknowl edged before me this y deHrey tiE Sd+oerrwaTter. President of JMS Homes Vic.. a Ynneso Cap�ro oars. on d o sod r oT'gn- . Not Public. County' My Commission apr STATE CONTY OF The foregoing Instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2001 by President of Chapel Hills United Church of Christ, a Minnesota non -profit organization. an behalf of odd corporation. Nolory�ublic, County' My Commission Expires: I hereby certify that 1 have surveyed and platted the property described on this plot as THE ABBEY AT CHAPEL HILL: that this plot is o correct representation of the survey: that all distances are correctly shown On the plot in feel and hundredths of o foot: that all monuments have been correctly placed in the ground oa shown• that the outside boundary lines are correctly designated on the plot and that there are no wet lands os defined In MS 505.02, Subd. 1 or Public Highways highways to be designated other than as shown. Gregory R. Prosch, L.ond Surveyor Ynnesoto License Number 24982 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foreaDi Surve s Certificate Certificate was acknowledged before me this day of 2001, by Gregory R. Froseh, iond Surveyor, Minnesota License No. 24992. Notary Public, _ County, Minnesota Yy Lommtssion xPe EDINA, MINNESOTA This plot of THE ABBEY AT CHAPEL HILL was approved and accepted by the City Council of Edna. Minnesota. of o meeting held this day of 21101. M applicable. the written comments end recommendations of the Commissioner of Transportation and the County Highway Engineer have been received by, the City or the prescribed 30 Wool period has elapsed without receipt of such comments and recommendations. as provided by Minnesota Statutes. Section S ool Subdivision 2. CITY COUNCIL OF MINNETRISTA, MINNESOTA Mayor TAXPAYER SERVICES DIVISION Hennepin County, Minnesota I hereby certify that taxes payable in plot. Doled this day of Patrick H. O'Connor. Hennepin County Auditor by. Clerk and prior years have been paid for land described on this 2001. SURVEY SECTION Hennepin Countyy, Minnesota Pursuenl to MILAN. STAT. Sec 3838.565 (1969), this plot has been approved this Gary F. Caswell, Hennepin County Surveyor by. Deputy day of 2001. COUNTY RECORDER Hennepin County, Minnesota thereby certify that the within plot of HASELOW ADDITION was fled n this office this day of 2001. at _o dock _M. R. Dan. Carlson. County Recorder by. Deputy LOT SURVEYS L'OMRANY, INC. F 1 I 1 1 RL Dom CASING W -1 a7a0 I 4a' ow SIR=. 0-1642 W -7 1 a57 -----=---- -1.._. 0 -1647 W -7 4/6.7 EAST �7la0y -� 4a• O1A A -1647 Com-1 SM5 !�Y (17] i��� 4Y 0y a -7067 eaW -7 SW a7L5 4a' mA a -7067 � m K MEEN01 _ ZI 12 2 b ---- - - - - - -- - ! 0.a. a 'mm"mY L ° into o c, e - �c � 1 w 1 - - - -- A 7pD .war - I ccasaux imm ILL aREDUMN -- - - - - -- \ - /L1J N-T4 a MAL YDMANAN - — — — — — — — — — — • ' G1 a 10. ALLAaON J 1 � C� c u•j 0.ae.1167fE \� 4 N. a & YAU= I •:_ V 0� as / o i TAL OCSCINPTION OF NEMSOG CA nx,,,otz J Wd .1 WAIN I •F i 1 �° O°i1� EAST aa4� I d<t j rz OCTAL (96IT 2) E i a 1 1 a a7la II. II wo I WO It 1 7 B I I I I Mb 7 R IN ama I I I I I 5 // ,a L3CTP / I 1 1 n ama I n I I 46'•4 4b w ' Sa •/'a�. No J / `116„• .��� /�i ►+sb s h I U 2$ i - BTU° \ \ / 7.IL •AaTa4E ♦ ♦ K a S AVSTAp m/ o RAMP /1 / \ rAP EET / \ 1 \ r \ RC OOVAbS�,, \\ STN11CA0a solval Nm 611L T17E CASING W -1 a7a0 wi*Amw 4a' ow SIR=. 0-1642 W -7 aw a57 4Y OIA 0 -1647 W -7 4/6.7 466.0 4a• O1A A -1647 Com-1 SM5 !�Y (17] i��� 4Y 0y a -7067 eaW -7 SW a7L5 4a' mA a -7067 NORTH 4 m s o SCa:E a RZT w sum 6UnOT f Ir 4 7s SURMCU 1T1161E CUM MAX 7N _� Au T. CUSHM Umm CUI® I.S• dTA�l01a 41 n 1[64 Y L.M 5, I >t east e• Ass oaN a1r9m IA4S701E (MWL) ilBm IFL11d1 137 3764 5003 IVOST m W 0;A1t k 1 M ERV CCRWT THAT 065 RAN MS PRIPMm C01aL N0. ROTTED: Tic BY WE OR UNDER w OWCT SIPERMSM AND TWIT 8716 1 AN A DULY REGSTER EN [D PROFESSONAL O6EER Roger A. Anderson & Associatis,.Im. UNUM TK LAMS Of TK WAR OF I WOMOTA C I V I L N N G I N N N N I N G C O N b U L T A N T a THE ABBEY AT CHAPEL HILL, P.U.D. UTILITY AND STREET PLAN ORA'a'D 610` P91 EDINA, MINNESOTA D B7: 1 15100 100 noub Nana. burrs a 1aMa1L a awl m 1767) >m -lea 7u Meol 3-100 3 OF 4 DATE 3-1� REO. N0. 1 7 1 I ,`•.I - I 1 --- --- --- --- c i \ OEIAIIL TOT wL 67ILo I 607, w" seao �10p WALL 6710 0 DOT. WALL 6611 i / t o o IOV. of W1E717 POOL V0. REOUFI[D . O.39 AF WIUMT POOL VOL PROVDW - 0.66 At NT1O1 VOL REOUF® 0 -100 ML EVENT) . 0.1 NOOM VOL REQxtEp t -100 V0. EYED) . 1.1 N7MO1 VOL PROVIOM . 1.67 Ar BOTTOM . OSLO . W" OF BOP . 670.0 FLOW SP6LWA7 • ELEV. SAILS Er: rMOR 0 MIT EVOMT. OISCKAROE - 0.3 C S HIL - 6694 Tx EM NE pi UNDER SIT DIRECT SUPERVISM ATD TMAT Inc. I AN A OULT RrasTarFD PaDFE�ONAL ENFJEiR Roger A. Anderson & Associates, I THE ABBEY AT CHAPEL HILL P.U.D. au.6k uNOER Dt EA.s a Dc sTAa a< IOW6SSDTA �DINA, MINNESOTA ATA RAISED 85MI ,' P,� CIVIL 6NGIN66■1NG CONSULTANTS rtw< OKCRED Or 1" lawn lab 111Y1a.POSTS. SOIL N. MUNUM � W"I in Es0 9m -IOM ra E7ra) = -Im OESCWPDON OF KIAS NS DATE RCG. Na NORTH ■ o a SCALE N FEET - EROSION CONTROL NOlES� � ar.a ewn•eIw ruu sr lawm r o6.rttaa v ru u�rmms VIYO e x vaaa sort. mrro e mea.c.w a wa o® aw7n rarWa e•uID rw s xa rue s nasm -.w rr. rare at ro¢ tmrauaw m w to.awr mtm trra au a msac ®s acrF .. ■ x mas aWQ w m masts wowm • �w v e mt. a at rov. e twr Pu Paco tl rW -.n�.W ru trsm a owrr glWtla L tnratr. wuo m As awu r•srip r. re. wv rrm aossels a mP. wwa •m oaN.ROr Itttes ) w tm •m .Aa s m • For awi arwce . r.sa WtrrO �a • wn •O aua9t I•a1p.Q.p1 m stra m o0. • arrsa mroras w rca ri. P.tr W OOP mre awro tl Pow P ttsz n•e a Wmtnm •m - ra0on w mm w® me wrto ®rr. am m wma. •v.tat reap. a u wsa ee rauo.al : rr.nr.m w x mmanw .•ra versa oo• m a a •w tOrartlr r arto .r.. n omia tl wm m s >m wwa s wsnm w a mia ve x a•ms m�arrav w mom P x ' rsma x carts mrruca aVr w ev x .dt•aa. tsars ru. mcra W. xa tu.e rW .avr m a x Dues u mratalm msrrpw w X— x Was mm s car ta.twts v naa nFrsa m x aaa auas e w aawtrs v x wFA mM¢L r. 1t® tw taart o m sF/•p� A W'xrr/t•09 F 1aa/rs lmr an ®) r. x mwo tvmtrwn s tore. 09st.a trove w x car a ta@ its • rV1. rued w aww a aw.sm a•ras m ®mrue atwm wa r4 , . w•a ..w x ettatusts ta.a - a n a era w. to au®m x .W n nn• .OSe a .Fro Rtl. ns rro t.tlw� term trtaown x arts s t.ascca m ea tta..w. morns m e aeo P x Osmt a u mane s x taa verso ass...V• a wtwa ra x a.s�m rvL u •ta Wmw • Wimrr ta.an tram ro« w ne rVrw re rAOm111R . x Iar tl 04tm P x cave@ rWl m.a. m x vol +�mors sa tl.un . ttatl a!a m rr.rmat 1rC ®N eoP••. .FQOSION CONIROL SCNEOL � OF MSTAI- 1 -A71ON R NAINTENW" oa /IDAY® ®Itltr®aa mm ..atr a P.L vta s.nrat :r rtra wa m m.oimm rtta ua .►ar wtlwW rsA a s cans va.m port. Imo WDratr itsWm tl� m mt, raw W a..omon ..tR aMaVUae raw W ..s ws.e s was araum wnr tl anon raa am ras carom eav aauua.. rowan. Faa1C111W a mFU:ID. vent tl rmO s� w urs tawca s rsncr •was rain w.rra me t trAM rr.ur rurrsn. naa wt mat. s rs •rmt an anon r61.11•IR atllwt M1a .tact • Prrw �. armrcr ro. .rra a1 °"e +sM rRAw wu ' ovum mote ®m am • na •rol r.n sett _ sm • P.rw s atnrl ar0umn a a�.tsrdr '�"rr. rWn trtttlec - ror: tsaucer a vtsF rw smuts. ws7Pe r. atrrwa v ru rrwwF tr ®r a mat awe rm r m r a tm— cing- ROCK 921103" Wig GRADING. DRAINAGE & -EROSION CONTROL PLAN aa. NQ - PLOTTED 9716 um mm 2 OF 4 � .e� erueww Ora® ras wnamms rWr°O1 atta+w v �oftl�a- aM' et6 mRS6 vWr mreArtaa oc waa rm roe .. Vs u t ''L� a rasa •tuw rss a sR a w s sn s � taaw a awln a Trw SILT FENCE rrc.tQl r m r a tm— cing- ROCK 921103" Wig GRADING. DRAINAGE & -EROSION CONTROL PLAN aa. NQ - PLOTTED 9716 um mm 2 OF 4 o / IN / i / / O / O / AIIDM \ \ / / / / PLANTSCNEDULE On 1Q1' CWT'MON N1A1! 004MICJL wre sm< 1aPTinlae 7o APPIOWm C010E9FOA VARETT S'-A ETe 74 OECmumm VAOM" 7 -N as PLANTING NOTES OW ALL AFEY OWLIRM DIE TO 014010 AMCM OONOTMlCfM AO ALL RANT 11ATENIAL 6ALL COVLT WN TWO L.AIM 79111011 OF M •AP60CAN MAOA10 PON WLNOERT MOM ArRW»K ASSOCY11O1 OF Mp76lT111/ NO WWTIIIITIOI OF OW 011 ONAM SMALL M /6ATTm smim PNT01 LR11LN AYCCIRATIDI Nb19E LAIpCAPE A111211[CT. ALL PLANTS SMALL W "" TO TTM MAV! NCWJL AC MLL C1!Y60PM ESIANCH KlIBL 00 WAVE A VCOIOI! AND 7llq! MOOT STMQL ALL PLANTS 64ALL ALSO s MQ PWSN VS!PWM 011•01400 DOTS WMA' D MARES AMA DEEASE6 E = EOOS 110FWW AO ALL POl11 OF 4RMATIM ALL Ns PLANM 41 3. = MPm— 11Y4N N llf M mm m Go C-" Y THAT POLIO N TM. P111IIbPOLrtAN / W04LAP S AIWA OELTTME MOM P0101W AV W1OON PLA"AND PANOICIS AOCOPOM TO sT.Ad16m 6I0R110LIL AL FIUCN® r'77®ATMY IE,EL -N RANTS TMM AM NW TO s RANTED MIWOI IOIm MOIL ALL PLATS TO 1111 NTAW W FEN F LAITM DUAL ALL RL01644LL s dE®OM WIAIOLDCO. ALL VMWXMMM TIEEO TO WAWW A- OEIP 6PI®DW WWAImuDOD 1f1G1 YIM NO ALCM N VNM= CONTACT NITM 110 TMNL NO RAM NATEAAL 60OTTAOIOt VILL s ACCEPTED INLETS APPROVAL 0 IE9LESTW CF M LANOOCAPE A00241W W M LANDOCAP! CPONACTOM FI TO M 060MON M R A 00 MOIW OYOTATIOL CODIYCTCRO PM CM4010 fWfIENANCR OF ALL MEL IO T NOTALLED MIENS" IL Tm O COE]L ACQl1AIQ ANT ACTO OF VANDALISM OIL DMAW IMDI MY O=M PIOON M GOWN A=IPTANCE WALL W M IEMWNOLTR OF M COMNACIOR 1604LANTY (CHIT PILL OIEAIOO OEAOONI MOIL LAIOOCAP! TATIOOALS 6YLL �1 CM M DATE C• AGCEPTAPC! W M LAIOOCJPC AMCIOTECT AFTER M ORTLITIW O FLAlIMO OF ALL LMOOCAPE MYEARALS NO PALATAL ACM"AMM 01L i 00000 ®. ERA@ W OF M FLAW OTOGC OMALL s LMM TOOK NETLAMP EMT. AT NTCPSW Off• POW% MO VANIRT. FEN TRdAWNO LOO.ATCH TIRmxmCw M CIE T71AN OWIANAMQ rl l �r f -I! HY 3 I� ` • W rr r.w w— f W— P�Ir I • � ,W� r DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL e fW�r -e w 4A P-" w.aW r ■ A A W1WY L �.r �. • =rA: �. '~'...rte r� :�.. • r- � Wn r P— Wppfp M W —b r iW • W r NSW � - -1w CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL p b p sca"I N FEET 11E5ar3cm I 1 HEREBY CERWY THAT THIS PLAN MS PREPANm 090L NR - RDT RQ Tir BY YE ON LIIUER w ORECT SIRAMSIoN me DAT - 9716 1 AEA Cm REpSWU PHOnMsKoA1 EIOEETI Roger A. Anderson & Associates, Inc. THE ABBEY AT- CHAFER HILL P.U.D. SITE & LANDSCAPE PLAN G�-� ORA1711: 1 FOES THE uE5 a THE STATE TOI[$OTA EDINA, MINNESOTA 4 4 _ KA AL PSH CIVIL 6EGIBE9BSING co of IS LT A N Ts / A Al EIQ MTE .Owwlm Q RENTS m MCHED Or - 1 islet 160 MpIE mmm M!R R ft— 1!1 sAU R ISM) =-NON ra /153) = -Has - D11T[ 3-T=D1 NEC. 710. a�+s7 . a REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item: 11. C. From: Craig Larsen Consent ❑ City Planner Information Only ❑ Date: June 19, 2001 Mgr. Recommends 0 To .HRA ® To Council Subject: Action: F � Motion Demolition Permit ® Resolution Moratorium. Country Club ® Ordinance District ❑ Discussion Recommendation: . The Planning Commission recommends adoption of the attached ordinance. They also recommend that the second reading be waived. Info /Background: The attached ordinance would provide a moratorium on permits for demolition of principal structures in the historic Country Club District for a period of six months. The six -month moratorium would afford the Heritage Preservation Board the opportunity to study the need and desirability of regulating the demolition and rebuilding of homes in the historic Country Club District. Attached to this report are proposed Ordinance No. 114, draft minutes from the May 30, 2001, Planning Commission, and April 24, 2001, Heritage Preservation Board meetings; correspondence from consultant, Robert Vogel, a proposed survey to be mailed to the Country Club District residents and a site plan of the Country Club District. ORDINANCE NO. 114 AN ORDINANCE IMPOSING A MORATORIUM ON ISSUANCE OF PERMITS FOR DEMOLITION OF PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES PURSUANT TO SECTION NO. 410 OF THE EDINA CITY CODE IN THE FAIRWAY AND BROWN SECTIONS OF THE COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Purpose. Pursuant to applicable Minnesota statutes the City will be conducting studies, pursuant authority and direction of the Council, for the amendment of official controls, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.352, Subd. 15. The amendment and official controls being studied will consider, among other things, the need and desirability to regulate the demolition and rebuilding of homes in the historic Country Club District with respect to height, size, location and architectural style. However, while the amendments and new official controls are being considered, proposal for demolition of old homes and construction of new homes and applications for permits therefor, continue to be made. Therefore, in order to protect the planning process and the historic integrity of the Country Club District, and the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Edina, it is necessary and desirable to impose the following moratorium pursuant to the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Section 462.355, Subd. 4. Sec. 2. Moratorium. From the effective date of this ordinance to and including the six month anniversary of such effective date, subject to earlier termination or extension by the Edina City Council, the Building Official, and the Edina City staff shall not grant any permits for the demolition of principle structures pursuant to Section No. 410 of the Edina City Code in the Fairway and Brown Sections of Edina's Country Club District. Sec. 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect on and the effective date of this ordinance shall be, June 19, 2001. ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor DRAFT MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF MAY 30, 2001 Country Club District Demolition Permit Moratorium Mr. Larsen informed the Commission Members of the Heritage Preservation Board have recommended a six -month moratorium on teardowns within the historic Country Club District. Mr. Larsen stressed the recommendation for a moratorium in no way reflects a problem. The goal of the moratorium is to ensure there are no weaknesses in the present code as it relates to teardowns, and to protect the historic integrity of the district. Mr. Larsen introduced Ms. Repya city staff liaison to the Heritage Preservation Board and Mr. Robert Vogel, of Robert C. Vogel & Associates, preservation planning consultant. Commissioner Runyan asked Mr. Larsen Mr. Vogel's role in the moratorium. Mr. Larsen explained in the up- coming months Mr. Vogel will work with city staff and members of the Heritage Preservation Board as they re -visit city code. Together they will formulate guidelines for the district. Commissioner Ingwalson asked Mr. Larsen the role the Planning Commission plays in the moratorium. Mr. Larsen explained the Heritage Preservation Board advises the Planning Commission and in turn the Planning Commission advises the Council. Mr. Larsen said at this time the Heritage Preservation Board is asking the Commission to consider recommending to the City Council a six -month moratorium on demolition permits in the Country Club District. This moratorium will allow city planning staff and advisory commissions time to examine how to best approach teardowns in the district. Commissioner McClelland referred to a copy of a "Country Club Survey" she received in her Commission packet and asked -Mr. Larsen when the survey will be mailed to the Country Club residents. Mr. Larsen said he believes the survey will be mailed to Country Club residents after the moratorium is in place. Mr. Vogel addressed the Commission and informed them the main reason for requesting a moratorium is to grant time to study the teardown issue and develop a land use strategy before another teardown is requested. Continuing, Mr. Vogel informed the Commission in the 1920's Edina was a small village. During this time the concept of the Country Club District was developed as a planned community with sidewalks, compatible streetscapes, and tree lined streets. Building restrictions for the planned district also included criteria for size, value, scale and architectural style. Commissioner Ingwalson told the Commission he has opinions on teardowns within the Country Club District, and is concerned more might occur without proper supervision. He explained he is a long time resident of the district, and one concern he has is that the people making decisions for the district might not live in the district. Commissioner Ingwalson acknowledged to date the two sites where teardowns have occurred have resulted in new homes that meet the character of the Country Club District. Concluding, Commissioner Ingwalson said any future "committee" would need to be careful in placing restraints on individual homes, and if it is deemed appropriate for a committee to review house plans maybe those individuals, should come from the district. Commissioner McClelland referred to question #7 on the Survey form and recommended that question be changed to read, "Please list any other comments or suggestions you have about the Country Club District ". She said in her opinion that reads "more friendly ". Commissioner Swenson asked who the members of the Heritage Preservation Board are. Mr. Larsen explained members of the Heritage Preservation Board are appointed by the Mayor, are Edina residents, and have an interest in Heritage Preservation. Commissioner Lonsbury said he understands the focus of the moratorium is on the Country. Club District, and its historic significance, adding in his opinion there may be other neighborhoods in the City that warrant consideration. Commissioner Lonsbury said, as he understands the Country Club District the "District" is on the "National Register of Historic Places" but not individual houses in the district. He commented it might be difficult to isolate individual houses. Concluding, Commissioner Lonsbury agreed with staff that presently there appears to be no problem.. The District polices itself well. Chairman Johnson asked if this request would go before Council. Mr. Larsen said if the Commission recommends a temporary moratorium it will move forward to City Council. Commissioner Byron said he has some reservations on a limited area moratorium because it does not include the.entire City. Commissioner Byron said he understands members of the Heritage Preservation Board are only concerned with the Country Club District, but in his opinion since no problems have been recorded it might be better if a moratorium on demolition permits encompasses the entire City. Concluding, Commissioner Byron asked if the final goal is for a positive collective guide policy for the entire city or just the Country Club District. Mr. Vogel said at this time the focus is on the Country Club District. Mr. Vogel explained residents in that district already realize their homes are located in a historic district. Mr. Vogel said the City has exhibited a commitment to historic preservation that goes back almost thirty years. Mr. Larsen said he understands issues expressed by Commissioners this evening and explained with the moratorium the City is being pro- active, he reiterated a problem does not exist, but the City is committed to preservation of the district. Commissioner Ingwalson acknowledged as a resident of the district there has been no negative reaction regarding the two teardowns, however within the district a level of concern exists. A discussion ensued with Commissioners in agreement a moratorium may be warranted. Commissioner McClelland asked Mr. Vogel if he believes six months is long enough to address the teardown issue. Mr. Vogel stated in his opinion six months is adequate to develop an appropriate land use strategy for the historic district. Continuing, Mr. Vogel said it is important to recognize the historic significance of the Country Club District, adding it is one of the first planned neighborhoods in the Country. Mr. Bill Horn, resident of the Country Club District, told the Commission there is an element of concern in the district regarding teardowns. Commissioner Lonsbury moved to recommend at the request of the Heritage Preservation Board a six -month moratorium on demolition permits for principal structures within the Country Club District. Commissioner McClelland seconded the motion. Commissioner Workinger commented in his opinion the motion made this evening is good, but he is worried about the exclusiveness of the motion. Commissioner Byron agreed focusing on just one area in the City is tough to sort out, but the Heritage Preservation Board and staff support the request for moratorium and I will agree with that request. Commissioner Ingwalson said as a resident of the district I have concerns, but believe at this time I should abstain from the vote Ayes, Lonsbury, Swenson, McClelland, Runyan, Johnson. Nay, Workinger. Abstain, Ingwalson. Motion carried. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD TUESDAY, APRIL 24, 2001, AT 7:00 P.M. GEORGE BAIRD HOUSE 4400 WEST 50T" STREET MEMBERS PRESENT: Bill Crawford, Peggy Jennings, John McCauley, Herman Ratelle, Lois Wilder, and Vice Chair Don Wray MEMBERS ABSENT: Chair Gary Nyberg STAFF PRESENT: Joyce Repya OTHERS PRESENT: Jack and Marilyn reservation Planning Robert Vogel, P Consultant Prior to the meeting, Mr. and Mrs. Curtis treated board members to a tour of both the interior and exterior of the George Baird House, 4400 W. 50th Street (their home). I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: Member Herman Ratelle moved approval of the minutes from the February 27, 2001, meeting. Member John McCauley seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. II. HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLANNING CONSULTANT: & III. COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT Planner Repya reminded the Board that at their February meeting they approved the hiring of Robert Vogel &Associates to serve as consultants to the HPB specifically to address the possible rezoning of the Country Club District to Heritage Preservation District. Mr. Vogel was present to discuss the scope of the project and the support he will provide to the Board. Mr. Vogel explained to the Board that the National Register designation of the District is honorary and recognizes the history and planning of the neighborhood, however there are no regulations enforced by the National Park Service. The Park Service depends upon the local government to establish their priorities and protection for the historic integrity of the designated area. Planner Repya pointed out that for the past 20 years, the City has depended upon the voluntary cooperation of the District residents to ensure that changes to the homes are in keeping with the character of the historic neighborhood. With the exception of changes that have required variances, the city codes do not provide for Heritage Preservation Board review because the District does not have the Heritage Preservation District overlay zoning. In the early 1990's, concern was raised about the lack of control the HPB had with respect to changes in the District. At that time, the Board agreed that a brochure explaining the history of the District and requesting homeowners to consider the original architectural style of their homes when contemplating changes would best serve the goals of the Board at that time. Board members agreed that the educational brochure did a great job of enlightening District residents about the unique character of their neighborhood. Furthermore, they pointed out that for the most part, there haven't been any glaring problems constructed in'the neighborhood. However, within the past year, two homes have been demolished with new homes built on their sites, raising concern among some of the residents regarding the lack of control the City has to protect the historic integrity of the neighborhood. . Vice Chair Wray reminded the Board that at the joint meeting the Heritage Preservation Board had with the City Council, the Council expressed interest in the District, and suggested that the HPB survey the District residents to determine their attitudes about their neighborhood and the changes which have been occurring. Working toward that end, Vice Chair Wray suggested that the Board commence with the development of the survey by first identifying the objectives they hoped to achieve. Following a brief discussion, Board members concurred that ensuring that changes occurring in the District maintain the historic integrity of the area is. a primary concern. Board members stressed that the focus should remain on the entire district and not to begin focusing on each of the 550 homes.. From the standpoint that homes are removed from a lots, the Board indicated that'it would be important that another home would be constructed on the site, in lieu of a tennis court, swimming pool or other amenity that would have a most detrimental effect upon the streetscape. Member Peggy Jennings suggested that a cover letter introducing the survey should explain the history of the District and the reasons the Board is requesting the opinions of the residents. Mrs. Curtis suggested that the history be presented in a contrast format comparing the District of the 1920's with the E N 1 District as it exists today (Where You Live, Then and Now). All Board members agreed that would be a great approach. Regarding the survey itself, the Board members agreed that there should not bee too many questions, because people would be,less likely to respond if the survey was too lengthy. During a short brainstorming session, some of the proposed questions for the survey included: 1. Do you feel there is a problem with changes occurring in the District? If Yes, please define the areas of concern. 2. How would you regulate changes occurring in the District? 3. What could the City do that would best enhance the investment in your property? 4. What vision do you have for your neighborhood in the future (2020 and beyond)? Member Ratelle warned that the Board be careful with the wording of the survey so as not to stir up a hornets nest where one currently doesn't exist. All agreed that was sound advice. Planner Repya advised the Board that she would work with Jennifer Wilkinson, the City's Communications Coordinator to ensure that the cover letter and survey are consistent with the standards established for all City correspondence. She further indicated that she would have a draft copy for them to review at the May meeting, and if approved, the letter and survey could be ready to mail by the beginning of June. Discussion ensued about the possibility that a request for the tear - down of a home in the District might arise during this period of time that the Board is working on this project. Member Jennings suggested that a moratorium be put into place to suspend all requests for homes to be torn down in the district for a period of six months or one year to enable the HPB to come up with a plan. Board members agreed that would be an excellent idea, thus Member Jennings moved that the HPB recommend to the Planning Commission that a moratorium on all tear down requests in the Country Club District be enacted for a one year period of time to enable the Board to research the issue and come up with a plan. Member Bill Crawford seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. 3 Robert C. Vogel & Associates Historians, Archeologists and Preservation Planners 216 Cleveland Avenue S.W. New Brighton, Minnesota 55112 -3508 Telephone (651) 604 -0175 Fax (651) 604 -0250 23 May 2001 TO: a Planning Commission F Robert Vogel, Preservation Planning Consultant Country Club District Demolition Permit Moratorium The Edina Heritage Preservation Board (HPB) has recommended that the City place a temporary moratorium on demolition permits in the Country Club District to let -the city planning staff and advisory commissions examine how to protect the historic integrity of the district. The proposed demolition permit moratorium does not include houses or other buildings that are outside the boundaries of the Country Club District — only the area that is on the National Register of Historic Places will be affected. The moratorium arose out of concerns about "teardowns" where 1930's vintage residences in the historic district have been torn down to make way for larger homes. The HPB and staff have also expressed concerns about the incompatibility of some of the replacement homes with the architectural character of the historic district. The loss of older homes represents a threat to the historic integrity of the Country Club District and adversely impacts the value of preserved homes. In §850.20 of the city code and the housing chapter of its comprehensive plan, the City Council has declared that it is city policy to encourage the preservation of the buildings, lands, areas and districts which possess historical or architectural significance. This commitment to historic preservation goes back almost thirty years. More than any other heritage resource, the Ccuntry.Club District defnes.Edina's historic character. To make. effective use of the historic homes of the Country Club District, to respect their value and extend their lives, the City needs to better integrate historic preservation into community planning. This is the immediate reason for requesting a moratorium on demolitions: to prevent the loss of the district's historic fabric while giving city officials time to devise an appropriate land use strategy. I look forward to answering any questions you might have about the teardown problem and the proposed demolition moratorium when I attend your meeting on 30 May. ' Cultural resource management consultants since 1978. till' 01 .Ull10 Dear Neighbor: The Edina Heritage Preservation Board works to identify and preserve Edina's historic structures and neighborhoods. The Edina Country Club District where you live is listed on the National Register of Historic Places, recognized as one of the first planned neighborhoods in the country. On behalf of the Edina City Council, we are gathering opinions on the future of this important neighborhood, the birthplace of suburban Edina. WHERE YOU LIVE THEN & NOW 1920's 1. Edina was a fledgling village of small farms. Grange Hall was the City Hall. You could buy a homesite in the Country Club District as small as 50 feet in width to as large as 100 feet. 2. The Country Club District was a planned community with sidewalks, close proximity to public transportation and membership to the Edina Country Club. Edina was transitioning from a one -room schoolhouse which served the farming community to a new school system striving to meet the needs of a growing village. 3. Building restrictions assured that homes built in the District met criteria for size, value, scale and architectural style. 2001 Edina is a thriving first ring suburb with a mixture of housing and commercial properties. City Hall is supported by about 15 facilities. In the Country Club District there have been no vacant buildable lots for decades. The Country Club District is one of many neighborhoods in Edina, however unique with its sidewalk system. Most residents own multiple vehicles. The Edina Country Club no longer has ties to a homeowners association. Independent School District #273 is a nationally renowned public school system. Building restrictions in the District expired, but Edina's Zoning Ordinance, adopted In 1931, provides some of the same protections. The Zoning Ordinance does not address value or architectural style. City Hall (952) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (952) 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (952) 826 -0379 Today, the Edina Country Club District is as desirable a place to live as it was 75 years ago. Most homes have been well maintained and real estate values have soared. Some changes have occurred and will continue to occur with time. Lately, there have been " tear downs" and re- builds, as well as additions to accommodate our changing lifestyles. We need your input about the future of your neighborhood. Please take time to answer the enclosed questionnaire and send it back to the Heritage Preservation Board by July 9, 2001. The future of your neighborhood depends on you. Sincerely, Gary Nyberg Chairman Edina Heritage Preservation Board Enc. ** *SURVEY * ** 1. Why did you buy your home in the Country Club District? Liked the character of the neighborhood Realtor led me to this neighborhood Proximity to work, shopping, other amenities Other: 2. Did you know the history of your neighborhood and that it is listed on the National Register of Historic Places? YES NO 3. 4. Are you bothered by changes taking place in your neighborhood? YES NO; If "YES ", please list .examples: Do you think there should be tighter controls and a review process established for changes to homes in your neighborhood? YES NO; If "YES ", please explain: 5. Currently, only construction projects needing a variance are subject to review by the Heritage Preservation Board. Do you think projects such as large additions and tear down /re- builds should be subject to Heritage Preservation Board review, regardless of whether variances are associated with the project? YES NO Why or why not? 6. Would you be in favor of the Heritage Preservation Board having design review authority over additions and /or rebuilds on your property? Additions: YES NO Re- builds: YES NO 7. Please list any other comments you have about the Country Club District. If you have any questions, please contact Associate Planner, Joyce Repya, at 952 - 826 -0462. mw Q i r I` • 0 ti / r/c t o4 iE of i • rr A. •�.r•�• • . �A�r7 WIN VA "A c. \ "-.0 LEOEND A• ED /NCI MORNINGSIDE SCHOOL 8- TRACT OFFICE C • JECOND VOTING PRECINCT D - GOLF CLUB E - GRANGE HALL _t I CO UNTR Y CLUB DISTRICT TO r vA Ow•rw •rt►•rr rwww I O,,, 6 uIJr�11C/ / r / • • r r• r • . I • r � / • I • 1 . J Ir r . • • / • 'v'w' N • r s r I` � • w rr • a M • « r, ♦ • • I r• I a / r • Y • I � r r r I+ a r r r r r r • _ � � r • w r r « r r r " ` a y1y I w ` r V • r - r r r .. r r •• > • r . I r • r• w r r r r - r w I • + r r • w r r• j I r • r r r • Riot I� , r1 • I • N • rT r. M I � I• I a v / ~ a r• • • / ~ I « w 1 I w / I w + • w a '• t. r � � • ,� I i « r r • r • • • N II I • r a r r 2 • « • • w r � 0 r r • V \ • • r '• • ` .. r • ' a r .. v w . C • •• u ' 0 . • r I 0 w • Nl/MBER !72 N n .• \ r• r •• rl � r `` •I • I r a w I • r, / . I r r « N r " M /I r r =r M r •I II •• / � ~ w r w - • I O r w r « n II r r• w r y r w I '• .� r1w i T •• , • ��^/I « r r r. w r/ J Af '• A IC=� �Q O so •W A fQ� JNpIOIMG �pil7 T 'd L o �.'(095? REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item: II. D. From: Craig Larsen Consent ❑ City Planner Information Only ❑ Date: June 19, 2001 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA _ ® To Council Subject: Action: ❑ Motion Allow Currency Exchanges in ❑ Resolution The PCD -2, PCD -3, and PID, ® Ordinance Planned Commercial and ❑ Discussion Industrial Zoning Districts. Recommendation: The Planning Commission recommends amending the Zoning Ordinance to allow currency exchanges in the PCD -2 and PCD -3, Planned Commercial Districts and the PID, Planned Industrial Districts. Info /Background: The City Council heard and continued the amendment at its May 15, 2001, meeting. Since then staff has done additional research on the use and its potential impacts. First, we have concluded that there are no sound legal grounds to prohibit them in all zoning districts in the City. We can, however, limit the number of Zoning Districts in which they could locate. The proposed amendment would eliminate the Office District, and the neighborhood commercial district (PCD -1) as permitted locations for this use. The proposed amendment would allow currency exchanges in or near the larger employment centers. The existing business is located in the PCD -2 District. The Police Department has reviewed crime reports for other suburbs that have had currency exchanges for some. Please refer to the attached memo from Police Chief Siitari. Memo To: Craig Larsen, City Planner From: Mike Siitari, Police Chief Date: 06/14/01 Re: Check Cashing Services — Calls for Service We have surveyed four neighboring communities that have check cashing businesses to get a better idea of what we can expect in our city. A brief summary of calls for service in the last year is as follows: Bloomington 2 locations /56 calls average #'of calls 28 Richfield 3 locations /28 calls average # of calls 9 St. Louis Park 1 location/16 calls average 16 Minnetonka 1 location/8 calls average 8 The number one call for service for the all cities was forgery or fraud at 52 calls. Alarm calls came in as the second highest call for service with 17 calls. The numbers we had earlier obtained from Minneapolis and St. Paul were skewed a bit by one location with 50 calls in one year. Their call patterns are similar to the suburban locations with forgeries and alarms topping the list. It is difficult to forecast from these numbers due to the fluctuations between cities and individual locations. However, the numbers are not out of line with calls for service at many other businesses. The Police Department has concerns about the additional forgery cases that would affect our Investigative caseload but in general, the type of calls check cashing services generate would not have a major impact on the quality of life in commercial or retail areas. • Page 1 EDINA ORDINANCE NO. 2001-3 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 850 OF THE CITY CODE TO ADD CURRENCY EXCHANGES AS A PERMITTED USE IN PLANNED COMMERCIAL DISTRICTS 2 AND 3, AND IN THE PLANNED INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT THE CITY OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Subd. 3 of Subsection 850.16 of the City Code is amended by adding the following use: "Currency exchanges as defined in M.S. 53A" Section 2. Subd. 1 of Subdivision 850.17 of the City Code is amended by adding the following use: "J. Currency exchanges as defined in M.S. 53A" Section 3. Effective Date This ordinance shall be in full effect upon passage and publication according to law. Adopted this 19th day of June, 2001. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: Attest City Clerk Mayor Minutes/Edina City Council/May 15, 2001 building to building along both 761h and 771h Streets. Mr. Hughes stated in his opinion this was one spot in the City truly needing sidewalks. Membe oush asked Mr. Hughes if there was heavy bus stated that believed this to be the case. No public comm t was heard. Member Masica ma e a motion closing the along this route. Mr. Hughes Member Hovland seconded the motion. Ayes:. Housh, Hovlan Masica, MaetzZesolution Motion carried. Member Hovland introduced th followi and moved its adoption: SOL O.2001 -30 ORDERING SI ALK IMPROVEMENT NO. S-068 PARKLAWN A ENUE AND WEST 76TH STREET WHEREAS, the Edina City Council n the 171h day of April, 2001, fixed a date for a Council hearing on the proposed sidewalk ' stal tion, Improvement No. 5-068, and WHEREAS, ten days' mailed n lice an two weeks' published notice of the hearing was given, and the hearing was he thereon on the 15th day of May, 2001, for Improvement S -068 installation of sidewalk on arklawn Aven a from West 77th Street to West 76th Street, at which time all persons des' ng to be heard wer given an opportunity to be heard thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE RESOLVED that the uncil has duly considered the views of all persons. interested, and eing fully advised of the p .nent facts, does hereby determine to proceed with the con ction of said improvement, inc ding all proceedings which may be necessary in emine domain for the acquisition of neces easements and rights hereby designated and s 1 be referred to in all subsequent pro edings as . Improvement No. Improvement S 8 installation of sidewalk on Parklawn Av ue from West 771h Street to West 76th. Street BE IT FUR ER RESOLVED that Improvement No. Improve ent S-068 installation of sidewalk o arklawn Avenue from West 77th Street to West 76th eet is hereby ordered as proposed. BE IT THER RESOLVED that the City Engineer is hereby autho d to prepare plans and sip ifications and advertise for bids. Ado p d this 151h day of May, 2001. Me er Masica seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Masica, Maetzold Motion carried. of COUNCIL ACTION CONTINUED TO TUNE 19, 2001 - ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT ALLOWING CURRENTLY EXCHANGES IN CERTAIN DISTRICTS Staff Presentati on Planner Larsen introduced a proposed amendment to the zoning ordinance which would limit the location of certain types of financial institutions. Currently, Edina Code allows financial institutions in all of the planned commercial districts except PCD-4 which is the gas station zone. Code allows them in both planned office districts, in th e industrial district, and in the mixed- Page 4 Minutes/Edina City Council/May 15, 2001 development district. The State of Minnesota has licensing requirements for several different types of financial institutions including banks, trust companies, savings banks, credit unions and currency exchanges. Currency exchanges primarily serve clients with check cashing, money orders and money wiring fees. Recently, a currency exchange business, Unbank, moved into 5125 Edina Industrial Boulevard in a small strip mall. The property was zoned PCD -2 and did comply with zoning ordinance requirements for that location. Mr. Larsen noted that staff believes there would be a legitimate reason to distinguish between currency exchanges and other types of financial institutions. The currency exchanges primarily serve large employment centers and workers who do not use the traditional banking system. In addition, the businesses seem to generate a significant number of police calls relative to other financial institutions. The Planning Commission recommended that these businesses be limited to the PC -2, PC -3 and the Planned Industrial Districts. Council Comments Member Masica asked when Unbank opened, and Mr. Larsen replied shortly after the first of the year. She also asked about the history of police calls thus far, and Mr. Larsen responded that he was not aware of any history of this kind at the Edina location. Chief Siitari agreed. Member Hovland questioned whether we could create a definition fora financial institution that excludes currency exchanges. Attorney Gilligan said that we can and that they are licensed under State law.. Member Hovland asked if this meant Edina would need to allow them into our community by a zoning regulation. Mr. Gilligan remarked that Edina would not.be required to allow them here, but there would be no basis to deny them since they are a permitted under the zoning code. No public comment was heard. Member Housh made a motion closing the public hearing. Member Masica seconded the motion: Ayes: Housh, Hovland; Masica, Maetzold Motion carried. Member Housh made a motion granting first reading to Ordinance No. 2001 -3 allowing currency exchange businesses in certain districts. Member Masica. seconded the motion. Member Hovland stated that he would like more information in order to make a well- reasoned decision. The reports of police calls to currency exchanges in the contiguous communities would be a concern. Mr. Hovland indicated that he would like to create a definition of a financial institution that excluded currency exchanges and thus bar them from doing business in Edina; however, he was not sure if that was a fair way to approach this issue. He suggested tabling the matter and in the meantime learning more about the currency exchange business before bringing it back for discussion in 30 days. Member Masica indicated that she had similar concerns and asked if Chief Siitari had some background on currency exchange businesses. Chief Siitari reported that his staff had heard reports of incidents. from St. Paul and Minneapolis, and as a result, Unbank has been closely watched but there have been no increased calls for service there. The clientele using the site have not up to this time drawn crime into the area. Member Masica reported her concern because Page 5 Minutes/Edina City 4Qouncil/May 15, 2001 1 Unbank has not been here for very long, things might change as time progresses and the word gets around. Chief Siitari explained that that was a possibility. Member Masica requested receiving information from the contiguous suburbs, which Chief Siitari said could be provided. Mr. Larsen remarked that he had spoken with staff from both Richfield and St. Louis Park who reported having one location in each city with no problems. He explained that he himself had questioned whether this type of business would become associated with a pawn shop; he has since learned that this was typically not the case. Member Housh asked if there were services received from this type of business that can not be given by other financial institutions. Chief Siitari replied that the clientele were people who are unable to or do not want to use banks. Mayor Maetzold confirmed with Mr. Larsen that this was not a pressing matter and that there was no indication of any other sites being planned within the City. He recommended taking Member Hovland's suggestion to table the issue for the time being. Mr. Hughes reminded the Mayor and Council Members that this was a published notice; therefore, it would be best to continue the item to a specific date. Member Housh withdrew his motion to introduce and adopt the ordinance, and Member Masica withdrew seconding this motion. Member Hovland made a motion continuing action to June 19, 2001, on the amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to allow currency exchanges businesses in certain districts. Member Housh seconded the motion. Ayes: Housh, Hovland, Masica, Maetzold Motion carried. tY PLAT APPROVAL scut UKA-NL V 1P-YV 052utu1n s Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered place ,,,,.,... A .,..,, — _ Planner Larse xplained that the property was located south of en Avenue and east of Sherwood Circle. ase U of Grandview Square would com to the platting of the entire development. Includ are outlots remaining from Phas I as well as three properties not controlled at the time of original approval—the Ed' Pet Hospital, the Classic Hair Design and the Noonan Office B g. The plat rovide a lot for the library /senior center building, a lot for the second co ornnuum b ing, and an outlot for the rearranged Sherwood Park. The Planning Commission o ended approval based on its consistency with the master plan for the Grandview Squ de ment. Mr. Hughes pointed out t the HRA has taken ossession of the Edina Pet Hospital and the Classic Hair Desi a possession date for the offi building on Eden Circle would be June 1• 2001. Staff rec ended granting preliminary approva �the at, and bringing it back, June 5, 2001, for approval after the HRA possesses all the pr Council Comments Page 6 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: Kris Aaker Assistant Planner Date: June 19, 2001 Subject: B- 01 -30, 4309 Branson St. Ethel Mahoney. Appeal of Zoning Board Approval of a 10 foot frontyard setback variance for a garage addition Info /Background: Agenda Item: II. E. Appeal letter _ F Meeting Minutes Information Only,❑ 40i REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: Kris Aaker Assistant Planner Date: June 19, 2001 Subject: B- 01 -30, 4309 Branson St. Ethel Mahoney. Appeal of Zoning Board Approval of a 10 foot frontyard setback variance for a garage addition Info /Background: Agenda Item: II. E. Appeal letter Consent ❑ Meeting Minutes Information Only,❑ Staff Report Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action: ® Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance 0 ❑ Discussion On May 17, 2001, the Zoning Board of Appeals heard and unanimously approved case file #B -01 -30 for a 10 foot frontyard setback variance request of property owner Ethel Mahoney, 4309 Branson Street, to allow the construction of a two -car garage in front of her existing .home. On May 29, 2001, the City Clerk received an appeal of the Zoning Board decision by Dana J. Powell, 4311 Branson Street. Enclosed for reference are the following: - 1. Appeal letter 2. Meeting Minutes 3. Staff Report 4. Application /Plans 5. Correspondence Draft Zoning Board Minutes, May 17, 2001 B -01 -30 Ethel M. Mahoney 4309 Branson St. Zoning: R -1 Request: A 10 foot front yard setback variance Ms. Aaker informed the Board the subject property is located on the south side of Branson St. consisting of a one and 1/4 story home with no garage. The homeowner is hoping to construct a garage in front of the existing house. The Zoning Ordinance requires that any addition to a home maintain the average front yard setback that is occurring on the subject side of the block between intersections. The average front yard setback on the block as established by the homeowner and her contractor is approximately 46 ft.; the garage is proposed to maintain a 36 ft. front yard setback. Mr. Aaker reported the homeowner has lived in her home on Branson St. for nearly 32 years. There has never been a garage on the property. The homeowner would like to accomplish a two car attached garage in the front yard area with a gap between the front of the house and the back wall of the garage to allow for a patio area. It is also the homeowner's desire to maintain a front bedroom window. Mr. Aaker pointed out the setbacks along Branson Street vary greatly from 62.5 ft. to the street to 35.5 ft to the street. The new garage will be approximately 36.17 ft. from the street. Branson Street curves, giving the appearance of inconsistent front yard setbacks. The new garage would not be the closest structure on the block. The architectural styles and the years built of the homes on the block also vary greatly. The design of the addition and materials proposed are meant to compliment the existing materials and architecture of the home. Ms. Aaker concluded the Zoning Board of Appeals has generally not supported front yard setback proposals of this magnitude, especially if the front yard setbacks are consistent along a block. The homes along Branson St. vary quite extensively regarding front yard setback with the proposed improvements not the closest on the block. While the variance is quite extensive, it would appear that the block could support it given the eclectic mix of setbacks and housing styles surrounding the subject property. The proponent, Mrs. Ethel Mahoney was present to respond to questions. Chairman Johnson referred to a letter put before them this evening from a neighbor, Mr. Dana Powell and asked Mr. Powell his objection to the proposal. Mr. Powell told the Commission he added an addition to his home that met all city requirements, adding it is his belief Mrs. Mahoney should built her garage according to code. Mr. Powell said if the proposed garage is built as indicated his view will be blocked, and he will not be able to see his children as they wait for the school bus. Continuing, Mr. Powell said Mrs. Mahoney could comply with code if she constructs a detached garage in the rear yard. Concluding, Mr. Powell said in his opinion the proposed garage is out of character with the neighborhood. Chairman Johnson pointed out the homes along this block have been constructed between the 1920's through the 1940's acknowledging the different housing types. Chairman Johnson also noted the curve in the street. Mrs. Mahoney told the Board she has been studying garage options for a number of years. Mrs. Mahoney acknowledged it is possible to construct the garage in the rear yard, but the topography poses a hardship, and there is a utility easement. Mrs. Mahoney explained if the garage were to be located in the rear, large trees would be removed, extensive grading would occur, and a retaining wall would need to be constructed. Ms. McClelland said in her opinion a hardship exists to find the proper garage placement. She pointed out the City of Edina has an ordinance requiring at minimum a two stall garage for each residence, and in the past the Zoning Board has attempted through the variance process the achievement of two stall garages for its residents. Chairman Johnson observed the proposed garage is not overly large for a two -stall garage. Ms. McClelland said in reviewing the proposal, viewing the site, the photos of the neighborhood, the model presented by the proponent she could support the variance as requested. Mrs. Mahoney said she is willing to work with her architect to pull the garage back a few feet if possible. Ms. McClelland moved variance approval subject to the plans presented, the use of matching materials, noting the hardship of placing the garage in the rearyard (steep terrain, utility easement, retaining walls). Ms. McClelland pointed out the homes on this block are staggered, the City requires residences to have a two stall garage, and because of spacing locating a garage in the rearyard may also require variances. Mr. Hardy seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Chairman Johnson stated that an appeal of the Zoning Board's decision may be filed with the City Clerk by submitting a letter of appeal within 10 days after the hearing. 06/04/01 MON 12:36 FAX 6123402644 DORSEY & WHITNEY I 47J002 MEMORANDUM TO: Kris Aaker Assistant Planner City of Edina FROM: Jerome P. Gilligan DATE: June 4, 2001 RE: Time Limit on Filing Appeal from Decision by Zoning Board of Appeal on Variance Under Section 850.04, subdivision 1,G of the City Code, an appeal from a decision on a variance petition by the Zoning Board of Appeals is to be filed with the City Clerk no later than 10 days after the decision of the Board. On May 17'h the Zoning Board of Appeals approved a variance. An appeal for this decision was filed with the City on May 29`h, which is more than 10 days following such decision, but since the 10 day period expired over Memorial Day weekend, May 291h was the next day following the end of such period on which the City Hall was open. You have requested my opinion as to when the 10 day period is deemed to expire when the tenth day following such decision falls on a Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday. Minnesota Statutes, Section 645.151, provides that when a document is to be delivered or filed with apolitical subdivision of the State of Minnesota (which includes the City of Edina) on or before a prescribed date and the prescribed date falls on a Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday, it is timely delivered or filed if it is delivered or filed on the next succeeding date which is not a Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday. Under this statute when the 10`h day following a decision of the Board of Appeals falls on a Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday, the deadline for filing an appeal of the decision is the next succeeding day which is not a Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday. Therefore, the last day for filing an appeal from the May 17`h decision on the Zoning Board of Appeal to grant a variance was May 29`'', which is the next day following the end of the 10 day period which was not a Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday. DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP /N 5--2001 I AM APPEALING THE DECISION OF THE ZONING BOARD TO ALLOW THE VARIANCE AT THE MAHONEY RESIDENCE. 4309 BRANSON STREET EDINA, MN DANA J. POWELL 4311 BRANSON STREET EDINA, MN 55424 952- 925 -5845 U -844- 'E WERE UNABLE TO GET A POSTMARKED DATE OF 28 -2001 AT 6:30PM ;-=IF j: } ;. May 18, 2001 Ethel M. Mahoney 4309 Branson Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: B- 01 -30, A 10 foot frontyard setback variance Dear Ms. Mahoney: This letter is to inform you your request for the above referenced variance has been heard and approved. The Zoning Board of Appeals met on Thursday, May 17, 2001, and issued the enclosed Order. Your next step is to apply for a building permit. Please feel free to contact the Building Department if you have questions on the permitting process. If you have any questions regarding the variance process feel free to call Kris Aaker or me at 952 - 826 -0369. Sincerely, Jackie Hoogenakker Zoning Board of Appeals Enclosure h (952) 927 -8861 City Hall FAX (952) 826 -0390 4601 WEST 50TH STREET TOD (952) 826 -0379 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 CITY OF EDINA PLANNING # B -01 -30 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 07- 028 -24-43 -0087 IN RE PETITION OF: 4309 Branson Street, a 10 foot frontyard setback variance For a Variance under Ordinance No.'s 850, 944, The above entitled Zoning Board of Appeals for the City of Edina at a regular (spe, -,W) meeting thereof has duly considered the above petition and after hearing, and examining all of the evidence and the file herein does hereby: FIND AS FACT: 1. Petition Filed: April 26, 2001 2. Fee Paid: 175.00 3. Notice Mailed: May 7, 2001 4. The Proposed Variance Would: A. Relieve and undue hardship B. Correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property, but not applicable to the other property in the vicinity of the zoning district. C. Preserve a substantial property right possessed by other property in the vicinity and zoning district. D. Not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in the vicinity or zoning district. Conclusions: YES NO X X 1U X 1. The procedural requirements of the Ordinance requested. ha been met. 2. The variance should {ne b t) granted Y PLANNING # B -01 -30 3. Conditions to the granting of said variance: Subject to the plans presented and the use of matching materials. 4. This Order shall be effective lay 17 2001 however, this variance shall lapse and be of no effer'. unless the erection or e alterations permitted shall have comet s extended pursuant to the effective date unless said period of time appropriate procedures prior to the expiration of one year from the effective date hereof. ZONING BOPKD OF APP i i -v- - y:, Chairp s1« to Dated:�— Order Mailed to Petitioner Mav 18 200 May 27, 2001 Time to appeal expires (Notice of Appeal shall prevent the issuance of a building permit until said Appeal has been determined.) LOCATION MAP o 2A -I VARIANCE NUMBER B -01 -20 LOCATION 4309 Branson R E Q U E S T A 10 foot frontyard setback variance EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT ■ ®i illy' WHO mom m® m® mm mm ® ®m ® ® -I VARIANCE NUMBER B -01 -20 LOCATION 4309 Branson R E Q U E S T A 10 foot frontyard setback variance EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT EDINA ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS STAFF REPORT MAY 17, 2001 B -01 -30 Ethel M. Mahoney 4309 Branson Street Zoning: R -1 Request: A 10 foot front yard setback variance Background The subject property is located on the south side of Branson Street consisting of a one story and '/4 story home with no garage. The homeowner is hoping to construct a garage in front of the existing house. The Zoning Ordinance requires that any addition to a home maintain the average front yard setback that is occurring on the subject side of the block between intersections. The average front yard setback on the block as established by the homeowner and her contractor is approximately 46 feet; the garage is proposed to maintain a 36 -foot front yard setback. Issues/Analysis The homeowner has lived in her home on Branson Street for nearly 32 years. There has never been a garage on the property. The homeowner would like to accomplish a two car attached garage in the front yard area with a gap between the front of the house and the back wall of the garage to allow for a patio area. It is also the homeowner's desire to maintain a front bedroom window. The setbacks along Branson Street vary greatly from 62.5 - 35.5 feet from the street. The new garage will be approximately 36.17 feet from the street. Branson Street curves, giving the appearance of inconsistent front yard setbacks. The new garage would not be the closest structure on the block. The architectural styles and the years built of the homes on the block also vary greatly. The design of the addition and materials proposed are meant to compliment the existing materials and architecture of the home. Conclusion /Recommendation The Zoning Board of Appeals has generally not supported front yard setback proposals of this magnitude, especially if the front yard setbacks are consistent along a block. The homes along Branson Street vary quite extensively regarding front yard setback with the proposed improvements not the closest structure on the block. While the variance is quite extensive, it would appear that the block could support it given the eclectic mix of setbacks and housing styles surrounding the subject property. O� ,aes PLANNING DEPARTMENT CASE NUMBER DATE FEE PAID. Planning Department 4801 West Fiftieth Street * Edina, MN 55424 * (952) 927 -8861 FAX (952) 826 -0390 APPLICATION FOR: VARIANCE /FEE RES. $175 /NON -RES. $300 APPLICANT: NAME: 6:7/ h�--.— M /L/ Ej:2 ADDRESS. Sr PHONE: �9sa,) �/d G S`7 PROPERTY OWNER: NAME: /79' M41� '(-/ ADDRESS: ��� ° t�/� ' Jc� ^� PHONE ` 6- ° -44,1-72 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OFPROPERTY: l,�-j- /)q&7t ✓i,,✓ o F Lo �s 8 y� a, gym. ffa /�-r �Si��, s< 7z r v: Cy PROPERTY ADDRESS:''���`'�.3c PRESENT ZONING: ,Pe5i P.I.D.# 07-6,2o —,;LL EXPLANATION OF REQUEST: o c� i� G�'�GC o� ti/o ff iZ�2iv/= oi:7 C A -w--16 fh -°c�1, i .e%��-�54,t-u/ /n)g-z -e.7 Lu ki !- ��Gr.J. �5'C� ALSo /QD�rL p � Al es e � rh a- lac -�3� oc1-)nl9:20, 1��sr�0 -- AJ �4ACAL i &z Izk 4-6- 2)9 /A& s -� (Use reverse side or additional�p�ages if necessary) r.�c` �c" � Li�✓C= C.l r r41 /�E7E�j� / L '' y _' -L �u.r �o cam, _' P � � f ;{c- -r r3�- J PHONE: ��5 � g�'g —�[ � "-5 ARCHITECT: NAME: �,-r u �;e o c� ?� �5 r> �J �i � r N 5 � l:ZS !�A -r.�� .��-� n�5'c� �f.i1L�c�• ma U SU .R: NAME: ,rs i3t1.�� c- PHONE: EYO _ a AJ - -ri*(s 1poPGW7-Cf . <- (Property Ow er's . ignature v ate) Applicant's Signa ure (Date) Application ..............page 2 Minnesota statutes and Edina ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. The proposed variance will: (If yes, please explain. Use additional sheets if necessary.) Relieve an undue hardship which was not self- imposed or a mere inconvenience. �, -� �,�cjle7,, ,4-ri4ls YES NO n ❑ / LIA,CO CzF ,,?P rJ7- -.✓� �G'a -�, S� �S o F �.Er �C c� G�f` <�, .Lc�.L. %�j i ,-✓ %�4% � S�6 5S M [, D� fJc WA-e, To /k T �r-c cJfi�c =-•v � � � S�/� �i �o cs !/ rise ��r�� l.es 7 a x-57. �L� A- O�.L T-X— � `f �,�pC p �:�_A-i✓��+u 6�cir.J� G—ft /fir c� r �J Correct extraordinary/ circumstances applicable El To this property, but not applicable to other _..- property, in the vicinity or zoning district. F-,=-P,,- &43L--- _7L op T ! D nJ e IJ i r�i /5� a •.1 s D Preserve a substantial property right possessed by other property in the vicinity and zoning district. S i N G C E- AJ S%O r% / S f� L' c-1 R. Ll S o •+) 7f STJ -r`r -T i/A--- � CP c-" i E- 6--k7- �J S, ✓- 4 , Not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in the vicinity or zoning A t •ct X1 IN" IS rl 7-1-1-1 /-/9 � /vlzJ JiES !G C'O-1� erz STS cc c� EX�t � v ,� lv c,LL f�c iz� l�LG 7 Ft/i �%+.ziCE 'T#r ,c� j /Jcss 11 F rf�t /I iEiGFF t� eHa� 1 c� u,,e ✓Y7 E cc A ; R ,E frtr. ,e c. 6r T S�T�•��lc s !gyp 4j S� -� /� �C 7�1� Cc�'c' /ti -L St�Fa.,� i ✓l ?CT- (G ?o Ada .- % / y• C�iAREOJT ------------- FRONT ELEVATION 1/4"=I' 4/9/01 n IMIN MIN Mm MIN mim mim MIM MIS ■ ■ ■ MEN El O 0 IMIN MIN Mm MIN mim mim MIM MIS ■ ■ ■ MEN El EAST ELEVATION 1/8 " =1' 4/9/01 PATIO WEST ELEVATION NEW GARAGE t /8 " =1' 4/9/01 20' -4" i PATIO GARAGE i i i I , I \\ II I L------------ FRONT - SETBACK 0 45' -9" ETHEL MAHONEY RESIDENCE 4309 BRANSON ST EDINA SITE PLAN 1 /8 " =1' 4/9/01 OAKDALE .?g,- s 3 . -,(. -- (., fD 4209 D ,37 4207 ' a4F GRIMES .y,•t rye. •• ��! �• �� A.• + • ., ` • '�! R%� +, :.'1 'Y .S ;:•/ .���+ Al • ' ��'` k " ,,:�`. •r : ;'�'�, ac' . ,,iii , , f �•�!� .'� �• •rte i . � _ w a ' i •^Y •q I� �✓ , +�, �• • � � �r9. •fr •! '� ,�`•i7'���y'•• {• '� � yi �5�� ter •- {� . �lq ` •.� , 7*fq •. �? " �} yet . ox 00 •� �� .I •. t ► . Y' �' a .. ° 4'� j.�� SJ. 'ri.� Ir.: 1 '4' i y�\ `IE�•, t Lam` � , . :'I Y �.• • y : ' • �F •'i��� �r � �[ � � ^! �!. �• f � .1 •w f�'�.� • �.s �tgg. _ _ _dye , _ ') r..' •`� qs+. •ytar+i�r y.o. L+�` �,.y..c.. J ar - . v. .•iPY � rla •r �.r�;T'• DATE: May 17, 2001 TO: Kristine Paulson -Aaker and Members Scheduled to Attend Board Meeting, May 17, 2001, 5:30 p.m.: Chair, Gordon Johnson, Rodney Hardy, Mike Lewis, Helen McClelland, and Geof Workinger, Carolyn Mueller and Dana Powell FROM: Ethel Mahoney, 4309 Branson Street �' PA_ SUBJECT: Response: Opposition of Varification Request: Carolyn Mueller and Dana Powell, 4311 Branson St., West Side Neighbor First of all, I would like to compliment Carolyn and Dana for the research they've done in gathering statistics regarding homes with garages on the street. I want to thank them again for allowing the soil digging equipment to enter and exit through their driveway, across their yard to my property, when I added a back side addition, because the space between my house and the fence was too narrow. (That was a one time occasion.) Other heavy equipment was brought in alongside the west 8 ft strip of my yard covered with plywood to protect damage to my foundation and yard. When they moved into their home at 4311, they had one child. As their family grew to four children, two adults, I often wondered how they did it.and encouraged them to expand their home. I was happy for them when they expanded the back /kitchen area and added a nice deck. However, they still lacked adequate bedroom space. As we talked "over the fence ", I encouraged them to build a second story even though I knew it would block some of my light to the west. I can understand that they've enjoyed their view to the east and don't want to see it disappear. However, if Branson Street were being develped today, all houses would have been set back more consistently so each resident would have a more equal "piece" of the view. This variance request is the result of measuring the set -backs of each of the homes on the south side of Branson, then figuring out the average distance by dividing the total sum by the number of homes. As indicated in the Staff Report, the average front set back on the south side of the street is approximately 46 ft. Dana and Carolyn's set -back currently is about 42.6 ft but prior to their upstairs addition two years ago, they had a deck surrounding the northwest comer entry which further shortened the set back. My guess is that it was approximately 6+ ft wide, bringing their previous set back to about 36 ft, which is approximately where I would expect the garage set -back to be, should the variance be approved. In response to the opposition memo by Subject parties above regarding a garage addition to the front of my home and their subsequent concern of the obstruction to their current east view, they've enjoyed that view mostly because, unlike most other homes on the block, my house is set back from their home about 14.5 ft from the north exterior of my porch and about 20.5 ft from the north side of my house. Since their home also extends past the home at 4313 to their west, they've had the luxury of enjoying views both to their west and east sides on Branson. Because their "set - back" extends so much further beyond my home, I'm unable to see any homes to the west beyond 4311, even though the street bends toward the right (north). Also, I have very little view to the east because, even though the house at 4307 is "set- back" about 6 ft further than mine, and has the longest "set -back" at 62.6 ft with my "set back" coming in second with 56.6 ft., the street bends to the right looking toward Grimes, so I'm unable to see beyond my home to the east. That limits my view to about five homes across the street, and since I have a front porch, which further blocks my view. I really have very little view to the front and sides of my home. To answer the reasons Dana and Carolyn object to this variance: 1) Can driveway be constructed on the east side with a garage in the back? a) I would lose my beautiful front yard maple tree, -one of the prettiest on the block. b) To accommodate a driveway, the knoll along the east side would necessitate a retaining wall built about 5 ft high, and 2 to 3 ft from the west side of the house at 4307, since it is very close to my lot line. c) The hill in the back of the yard would be a problem, it would entail either building a high garage foundation or extending the driveway about 125 ft to the back of the yard and downhill. This would not be aesthetically pleasing. d) The gas line would have to be moved. e) Since I don't have a much view from the west, north or east, this would destroy the only good view I have, plus not compliment the neighborhood. 2) Owner says driveway would be too long to snowplow. a) This is not the reason for requesting a front garage. It would simply be more convenient to have it more accessible. Several of the neighbors who have garages in the back seldom park their car in them. In the nearly 32 years that Ne lived here, other than not being able to afford it, Ne tried to figure out a complimentary solution to adding a garage which would be attractive, serviceable and accessible in the hopes of someday being able to have one. b) Some houses on the street are situated very close to lot lines to accommodate a one car, side of house, attached garage. Since the original owner of my home, did not drive, that was not a consideraton, c) Destroying my front maple tree to add a driveway would be a detriment, rather than an asset. 3) Out of 43 homes, 36 have garages behind , 3 have garages adjacent, 3 have no garage. a) I have no garage. The appropriateness of where/how to build a garage must be determined according to the unique character of the lot , environmental factors, and the like. The success of that endeavor depends on whether it will compliment the existing neighborhood or be an eyesore. From my point of view, given the existing knolls on the east and back (south) sides, and the environmental damage caused by destroying a beautiful, healthy maple tree, to put a garage in the back yard, with an unattractive, long driveway, would not be a fitting replacement. It would be a detriment, rather than an asset. Much as I would like a garage, I'm not willing to ruin my front yard and destroy the only good view that I have to build a garage! b) So far, I haven't mentioned how the new owners at 4307 (east side) might feel. I understand the owner's daughter and two other girls are renting the property while attending college. I highly suspect they would not appreciate a driveway, built up by a retaining wall, situated 2 to 3 ft from their bedroom windows. 4) Neighbors are concerned that I will try to build something less expensive and more convenient: As a homeowner, I'm more concerned than anyone that the final product be complimentary to my home and that of the neighborhood, complete with a new cement driveway and landscaping. a) Re: East viewing of bus stop: I can understand Carolyn and Dana's wishes to view the bus stop. Since the garage roof would not be a high as my house, I'm quite sure the bus stop will still be visible from an upstairs window. I know this may not be as convenient, but I would like to again offer a reminder that if the houses were being planned today, our homes would likely be more equidistant from the curb, all the homes would consistently block the views of another. b) Again, because my house is set back so far, and in particular the west front side of my house, (20+ ft) they enjoy more than the average viewing priviledges. Would it be too much to ask that I share some of those privileges, or should I be restricted by the fact that it was built that way, and therefore should never be changed? 5) Have gotten along without a garage for 30 years, why should I need a garage now? To me this question is rather absurd. Having raised four children at this location, I have always needed a garage. It would have helped so much for storing bikes, lawn equipment, play equipment and the like, to say nothing of cars, but similarly to Dana and Carolyn who were able to live in their small home with four children, - they were managing, so why did they need to expand? We all know the answer to that. So what constitutes necessity, they've asked? To be truly honest, most of us would agree that food, shelter and clothing are imperative. So why do we need anything else? Maybe we'd like to enjoy some of the amenities of life, as well as our neighbors. 6) Need to look at alternatives: I've studied and looked at the possibilities for years. Unless our neighbors are referring to relocating, which having been here for 32 years, is not even a consideration, given the size and type of lot, terrain, etc. it seems that a garage similar to those currently being built newer homes would be the most complimentary to the neighbor. TJ If a variance is granted, would I plan to use the design submitted? Yes. I'm happy with the design. I think the design is appropriate and carries out the original "Spanish" style theme. I've been working with Jim Kuzzy, of Plekkenpol Builders, since mid- December, 2000, who has checked with the City of Edina as to the possibility of the project and has reported that moving the water and sewer lines will be expensive, but'doable, and that I may also need a variance. After measuring the distance of each home on the south side of Branson and calculating the average set -back to be approximately 46 ft, I was informed that I would need a variance. While I had no guarantee of being able to proceed with the project, Mr. Kuzzy referred me to Luxe Design to come up with an attractive design to present to the City of Edina. Because of the need for a variance approval, Mr Kuzzy has been unable to give me a firm estimate. Plekkenpol Builders have a reputation for doing quality work, and while the City Planning Office has encouraged me to get other estimates, my "gut" feeling is that, if approved, and with this project being so difficult, I'd like to use this company, providing the estimate is anywhere near the "ballpark" figure mentioned to me earlier. CONCLUSION: Since I've lived at 4309 Branson for nearly half of my life and this community is such a part of my family history, it is important that if I am ever to have a garage, the only way to build it is to use a plan that will compliment my home and that of the general neighborhood. In considering the other limited alternatives, none of them "cuts it ". Rather than build something that is aesthetically unattractive, Pd rather do without! Hopefully, though, I will be given due consideration. In the years I've lived in this community, I've tried to keep my property neat and well attended and will continue to do so, whatever decision is made. It is my desire to have an amenable relationship with my neighbors, and particularly with those immediately next to me. If I may need to "push back" the front of the garage a couple of feet, which would shorten the small patio behind the garage, I'm willing to consider that. Hopefully, Dana and Carolyn will understand where I'm "coming from ". I'm not basing my request on expediency or expense, as my neighbors have suggested, but rather on how it affects the character of the street. Thank you for considering my request. Ethel Mahoney 4309 Branson St. Response to Variance request for 4309 Branson Street. Carolyn Mueller and Dana Powell- 4311 Branson Street (West Side neighbors) We are strongly opposed to the request for a 10' variance for 4309 Branson. We have resided in our home since 1987. We have had two additions done to our home during that time, all within city building codes. We are aware that many homeowners want to do additions during the development of a home. Our needs change and we adapt our home to fit those needs. We have a family of four children and have increased our home's size to accommodate our family. We had looked at moving before undertaking our additions. but we enjoy the neighborhood and the quaint setting of our long block, with sidewalks and very little car traffic. We are also aware that others will have additions, as our neighbor at 4309 Branson had done to the back of her home. At that time she could not get the heavy construction equipment to get to the back of her house so we allowed the equipment to use our driveway and backyard. We supported that addition in many ways. Our concern now is that her request for a variance to construct a garage will alter many of the views that we enjoy from the East Side of our house. I realize that when additions are done often the adiacent houses suffer from light obstructions. But when the construction obstructs views I think consideration should be made for that. Neither of our additions obstructed the original views from Ethel's home. I have outlined the following reasons that we object to this variance. 1. Can the house at 4309 Branson accommodate a driveway on the East Side of her home with a garage in the back, as the majority of the homes on our block have? 2. Neighbor states that the driveway would be too long to snowplow, many of us have same situation. She would have to move gas lines if she ran the driveway on the East Side yet with current plan she has to move sewer and water lines. She could have a service snowplow her driveway. 3. On our block of 43 homes, 36 have garages behind the house, some with very long driveways that they have to snowplow. In fact, not one house has a garage in front of their house. (The remaining 7 houses: 3 have no garage, 3 have a garage adiacent to the house and one is on a lot where the trolley turned around so the house is positioned at the end of the lot with no backyard and the garage is even with the garages next door.) 4. I am concerned that she wants the variance to build a garage that would be less expensive and more convenient for her, yet we would pay the price by losing the following: a. The east view from our sunroom window allows us to look down the street, because of the curve of the street it affords us a view of the bus stop and aids us in watching our children, and look out at the trees and landscaping down the block. With the new proposal we would be looking at a garage. b. Our family room in the back of the house has windows that face toward the East Side. The garage would obstruct views from this room as well. c. The view obstructions would adversely effect our property value. We recently put on an addition to increase the value of out home and we did not expect obstruction from the front/east views when we made plans. The sunroom that will be most effected was an original room to this house. The room was completely remodeled and the view adds to its value. 5. Neighbor states garage is a necessity- yet has not had garage for, 30 years- what constitutes necessity? 6. Needs to look into alternatives- although the alternatives may be more expensive or inconvenient. 7. If the variance was granted and a garage was to be constructed who would oversee that the construction is kept to submitted plans? Neighbor has not guaranteed that drawing submitted is the one she'll actually use. In Conclusion, we don't want this decision made because it is inconvenient for her to have a long driveway and garage in the back. Many of us would like attached garages or garages close to the home, unfortunately many of our garages are not built that way. If granted this variance a precedent will be set, and others may want the convenience of a garage closer to their homes. I think she is looking for a shortcut to securing a garage. I don't want this decision to be based on expediency or expense, rather on how it effects the character of the street and home values. Th you for your time and n ideratio CaroatMu ler and Dana Powell Page 1 of 1 Jackie Hoogenakker From: rcmills [rcmi117 @attglobal.net] Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2001 3:24 PM To: jhoogenakker @ci.edina.mn.us Subject: B -01 -30 Public Hearing We strongly support Ethel Mahoney's request for a 10 foot frontyard Variance. Her home is already an asset to the neighborhood, and the addition she wishes to build will only add to that. We see no negative or adverse impact to Branson St. from the construction she is planning. Thank you. Bob and Pat Mills 4308 Branson St. Edina 6/13/01 - -- T- - - - -- -- -- - - 7+� °c"is J J2 ' 5 i Gt.r X73 6 ;7 o ct: l I LZ zo C. r-[ X7679 y ' L f" oi XA T _6 t 7 - -.--- ire `�7'la�ir � Az FM DATE: May 17, 2001 TO: Whom It May Concern SUBJECT: Re: Property Construction at : ,4349 Branson .Street • O/ • 30 Edina, MN We, the undersigned, support the resident in her pursuit of property improvement. We feel this will add value to our neighborhood overall. As part of the Grimes homestead we feel this homeowner should be allowed to add a garage for her car and storage. The proposed garage construction is the best plan for this particular property. May 16,2001 To whom it may concern: Re Property construction At 4309 Branson Ave Edina MN We the undersigned support the resident in her pursuit of property improvement. We feel this will add value to our neighborhood overall. As part of the Grimes homestead we feel this homeowner should be allowed to add a garage for her car and storage. The proposed garage construction is the best plan for this particular property. OAKDALE 4 E C71 D-c-snj'r A4HIv- 4E cr 4401 T fik' " 4315 'VA It 3 ------------------- e WIN 7b e.ivj --------------- � 4307 4305 -6 ff 4303 -J ------- 4301 4215 A r7- oz JUN -19 -01 TUE 10 34 AM Jones /Harrison F ky NO. 612 928 3548 P. 1 June 19, 2001 Edina City Council" 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 I �--:; This letter is written in opposition to the granting of the 10 foot front yard garage setback variance for 4309 Branson Street. I am a home owner on Branson Street, four doors down from the applicant. My primary objection is the resulting change in visual appeal and continuity of the residential (not suburban) feel and look of the neighborhood ......as well as the potential for precedent setting. I strongly urge you to support your staffs recommendation to deny the setback variance decision. Sincerely, Sharon Brenny' 4401 Branson Street ~� J I • 55, Al ;T CL 4 To j�Sd 5dH 7N Pha Y lYi t�� f • �G� iv IV y 3 j `� 91va ff$ Al y% 06/19/01 TUE 08:03 FAX 9529250019 j CityOouncil 4$011V. 50th Street Edina; MN 55424 Attn: Edina Zoning Board ofAppeals Dear Zoning Hoard, - As homeowners on Branson St., we are writing to request an appeal of the frontyard setback variance granted to Ethel Mahoney. We all would appreciate a shorter driveway to maintain, but to maintain the charm and integrity of the street and neighborhood, we believe standards must be upheld. We are concerned that granting a variance could set a precedent which could diminish the appeal and property values of our street. As there is room on either side of the house for a driveway, there is no way a variance should be granted. This is a direct violation ofthe setback regulations and we object to any homeowners building garages in the front of their houses. We would be living in a big house in Eden Prairie if we wanted to be looking at curbside garages. Thank von for your consideration to this matt r1rR.- 0 a�bL� Jayne and Nick Klatt 4402 Branson St. Edina, MN 55424 [a 001 Jackie Hoogenakker From: MSHELSTAD [MSHELSTAD @mn.rr.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 1:09 AM To: jhoogenakker @ci.edina.mn.us Subject: Variance for 4309 Branson Street (Case File B- 01 -30) Edina City Council: In regards to Case File B -01 -30 we at 4406 Branson St. strongly support the 10 foot front yard setback variance requested by Ethel M. Mahoney at 4309 Branson St. We do not feel this variance will, in any way, detract from the overall aesthetics of our neighborhood. Marian P. Shelstad Nancy C. Shelstad 4406 Branson St. Edina,MN 55424 Phone No. 952 - 929 -8300 TO: FROM: VIA: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Mayor & City Council Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: 19 June 2001, AGENDA ITEM III. A. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Decorative Precast Sound Barrier: Improvement Numbers SA -1 & SA -2 Company 1. Superior Concrete Products 2. Marcy Construction Co. 3. Jay Brothers Construction Co. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Superior Concrete Products Amount of Quote or Bid 1. $ 121,715.00 2. $ 145,860.00 3. $ 184, 580.00 $ 121,715.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This bid was for the construction of a decorative precast concrete sound barrier along McCauley Trail from north line of Brenden Glen Plat to north line of 6453 McCauley Trail and McCauley Trail (west side) between south line of 6737 Indian Way West to north line of, 6617 Indian Way West. The Engineer's Estimate is $128,710.00. This bid would be financed by special assessment to abutting neighbors who have petitioned for these improvements. CONTINUED FROM JUNE 5, 2001 COUNCIL MEETING The Recommended Bid is within budget not within budget Public Works - Engineering Department ,,-� 4 ; ) _ allin, Finance Director Hughes�City Manager k 9SNA,r�� a t M O REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: FROM: VIA: Mayor & City Council John Keprios, Director of Park and Recreation Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: June 19, 2001 AGENDA ITEM III. B ITEM DESCRIPTION: Complete Nature Pathway at Braemar Park, Improvement No. 003PK. Company 1. Perkins Landscape Contractors 2. Global Specialty Construction 3. Jay Brothers, Inc. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Perkins Landscape Contractors GENERAL INFORMATION: Amount of Quote or Bid 1. $ 42, 003.52 2. $ 49,647.00 3. $ 97,820.00 $ 42,003.52 This project will complete the Braemar Nature Pathway that is currently severed in two locations. The first location being the southerly portion of this system and the second location being the northwesterly portion of this system. This project will complete the southerly portion and includes crushed rock pathways along with a floating boardwalk system through the wetlands. The northwesterly portion will be completed by the Public Works Department latter this summer. This project will be funded through Braemar Golf Course. Staff recommends awarding this project to Perkins Landscape Contractors. i nature The Recommended Bid is within budget not within budg Park and Recreation Department Department lin, Finance Director Manager N EXISTING PATHWAY B EMAR PARK PATHWAY YSTE* E PROPOSED DATHWAY Y S O ts] to REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: FROM: VIA: Mayor & City Council Wayne Houle, Assistant Director of Public Works Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: June 19, 2001 AGENDA ITEM III. C. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Pump repair and install for City Well #9, Improvement No. PW 01 -2. Company Amount of Quote or. Bid 1. Keys Well Drilling 1. $ 37,035.00 2. E.H. Renner and Sons, Inc. 2. $ 42,363.00 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: I Keys Well Drilling GENERAL INFORMATION: $ 37,035.00 This bid is for normal pump maintenance on a thirty year old pump. This improvement.will be funded by the Utility Fund. Staff recommends awarding this project to Keyes Well Drilling. Signature \\� The Recommended Bid is J� within budget not within bud Utilities — Public Works 'Department n Violin, Finance Director n Hughes; Cry Manager TO: FROM: VIA: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Mayor & City Council Wayne Houle, Assistant Director of Public Works Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15.000 DATE: June 19, 2001 AGENDA ITEM III.D. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Roof Repair and Replacement Water Treatment Plant No. 4 Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. SELA Roofing 1. $ 72,723.00 2. Dalco Roofing and Sheet Metal, Inc. 2..$120,103.00 3. M & S Contractors 3. $176,816.00 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: SELA Roofing $ 72,723.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This improvement is for replacing the roof on Water Treatment Plant No. 4. The roof is over thirty years old and should ameliorate the leakage problem that is occurring. This improvement. will be funded by the Utility Fund. Staff recommends awarding this project to SELA Roofing. Signature The Recommended Bid is within budget not Utilities - Public Works FROM: VIA: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Mayor & City Council Ceil Smith, Assistant to City Manager Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: June 19, 2001 AGENDA ITEM LII.E. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Property Insurance Company - Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Travelers 1. $ 59,093.00 2. Hartford 2. $ 62,219.00 3. Affiliated FM 3. $ 74,662.00 4. 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED. QUOTE OR BID: Travelers $ 59,093.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: Staff is recommending the low quote from the Travelers Insurance Company. The City is currently insured by the Travelers and we have received excellent service from them. Mr. Jack Carroll will be at your meeting should you have questions. Administration Signature Departmer4 The Recommended Bid is within budget not within budget J alli , inance Director C n or on Hughes, City anager TO: FROM: VIA: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Mayor & City Council Ceil Smith, Assistant to City Manager Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: June 19, 2001 AGENDA ITEM 11I.F. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Insurance Renewals: Public Officials Liability, Police Professional, General Liability, Liquor Liability, Auto Liability, Equipment and Employment Benefit Liability Company 1. St. Paul Companies 2. 3. 4. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: St. Paul Companies GENERAL INFORMATION: Amount of Quote or Bid 1. $ 320,688.00 2. 3. 4. 5. $ 320,688.00 This quote represents an increase in the City's premium. The increase in premium is reflective of the general condition of the insurance market which for the last two years has seen rising premiums. Staff recommends this quote not withstanding the increase for the following reasons. (1) The City has a very positive relationship with the St. Paul Companies and (2) this type of package with all that it includes has a very limited market. Mr. Doug Crowther of the Harris - Homeyer Company will be present should you have any questions. Administration ignature Department The Recommended Bid is within budget not within budget //,�z e Wallin, Finance Director Hughes, Cit* Manager A. �y JOBS REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: FROM: VIA: Mayor & City Council Ceil Smith, Assistant to City Manager Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: June 19, 2001 AGENDA ITEM. E . ITEM DESCRIPTION: Worker's Compensation Insurance Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT) 1-$ 319,132.00 2. 2. 3. 3. 4. 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT) $ 319,132.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This year the St. Paul Companies made the corporate decision to no longer provide Worker's Compensation Insurance to the public sector. The City's agent approached other. companies (State Fund, RTW, Mutual Insurance Co. of America and General Casualty). RTW, MIOCA and General ,Casualty all declined to provide a quote.. The State Fund Mutual gave a quote of $150,000 but required a $300,000 deductible. This increase in premium is larger than the City normally sees but is directly related to the City's experience which is unusually high and is related to just a couple of incidences. Mr. Doug Crowther of the Harris - Homeyer Company will be at your meeting should you have questions. � Administration Signature Department The Recommended Bid is within budget not within budget .Joh alli , inance Director on Hughes, ity anager o e .�y •fN iee� // REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # N. A. From: Vince Bongaarts Consent Traffic Safety Coordinator Information Only ❑ Date: 19 June 2001 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Traffic Safety Staff Review Action ❑ Motion of June 6, 2001 ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Approve Traffic Safety Staff Review of June 6, 2001 TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW TUESDAY, JUNE 5, 2001 The staff review of traffic safety matters occurred on June 5, 2001. Staff present included the City Planner, Police Chief, Assistant Police Chief, City Engineer, Assistant City Engineer, Public Works Traffic Control Specialist, Sgt. Larson from the Police Dept., and the Traffic Safety Coordinator. From that review, the below recommendations are provided. On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and the staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They have also been informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, they can be included on the June 19, 2001, Council Agenda. SECTION A: Requests on which the staff recommends approval. 1. There is a concern by residents in the neighborhood of Sherwood Park that parking on Sherwood Road on the east side along the park is a safety hazard for neighborhood residents going to and from the park. Sherwood Park is strictly a neighborhood park with little or no use by those not living in the neighborhood. Much of the traffic to and from the park is presumably by foot and bike. There are no sidewalks in this area. There has been some all day parking observed there that appears to be employees from the clinic on the other side of the street. The clinic does appear to have adequate space in its parking lot. The west side of Sherwood is presently posted 'no parking'. The staff recommends the installation of 'no parking restrictions' for the east side of Sherwood along Sherwood Park. 2. The staff recommends the installation of a stop sign on Bissen Circle at Waterman Avenue. Bissen Circle is a new street that is part of the Waterman addition. 3. A request for all -way stop signs at the intersection of Beard Avenue and West 57th Street. The requestor has concerns for the safety of children and other TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW June 5, 2001 Page 2 pedestrians in the light of two recent accidents at that intersection, one involving a police vehicle. There presently are stop signs for eastbound and westbound West 57th Street at Beard Avenue. There are no signs for Beard Avenue. From January 1, 1997 to December 31, 2000 there were no reported accidents at this intersection. Early this year there were two. Both of the accidents involved vehicles on West 57th Street eastbound that failed to yield to vehicles on Beard Avenue. A hedge that was blamed for some of the problem that was on the north side of West 57th Street east of Beard has been cut down. This area has no sidewalks. A traffic survey of volume and speed was done on Beard Avenue south of the West 57th Street intersection. The weekday average traffic was 288 vehicles. The Saturday count was 231 vehicles and the Sunday count was 187 vehicles. The 85- percentile speed was 29 miles per hour. Out of 1,858 vehicles in the survey there were seven at 40 plus miles per hour, five northbound and two southbound. The staff could find no warrants to indicate a need for a four way stop at Beard and West 57th Street and recommends denial of the request. The staff recommends that a 'stop sign ahead' warning sign be placed on West 57th Street eastbound — half way between Beard Avenue and Chowen Avenue. 4. The residents at 5624 and 5638 Xerxes are requesting that 'no parking anytime' restrictions are posted in front of their properties in the 5600 block of Xerxes on west side of street. The request would involve approximately 75 feet extending from ten feet north of the driveway at 5624 Xerxes to ten feet south of the driveway at 5628 Xerxes. The requestors say they need the restrictions in order to have safe access in and out of their driveways. Directly across the street from the requestors is the Xerxes Manor Apartment complex (5625 Xerxes). The two driveways to the apartment complex also open to Xerxes directly across from the requestors. Between January 1, 1997 and December 31, 2000 there have been seven accidents in this area that have been reported. Xerxes Avenue at this point is a major collector street with heavy traffic both AM and PM rush hours and fairly steady traffic levels during daytime hours. TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW June 5, 2001 Page 3 Xerxes Avenue at this point is also Hennepin County Road 31. The east side of Xerxes is maintained by the City of Minneapolis. The west side of Xerxes, or the Edina side, is actually under Hennepin County maintenance. Recently, in order to give the residents of the apartment complex better visibility coming out of their driveway the City of Minneapolis posted 'no parking' for approximately 50 feet to the immediate south of the complex's driveway. On the requestors' side of the street there is approximately 32 feet between the two driveways at 5624 and 5628 Xerxes where residents of the apartment complex have been parking creating exit and entrance problems for the requestors from their driveways. In order to install the 'no parking restrictions' a resolution from the City Council is needed asking Hennepin County to install such signs. That resolution along with a diagram of what is needed is sent to Hennepin County and they in turn will install the signs. The staff recommends that the City Council approve such a resolution so that the 'no parking restrictions' can be installed from ten feet north of the driveway at 5624 Xerxes to ten feet south of the driveway at 5628 Xerxes. 5. Along with the new construction at Fairview Southdale Hospital the 6500 block of Drew Avenue will be redesigned to give better access to and from the hospital. There presently is parking allowed on the east side of Drew Avenue in the 6500 block. Employees in the area have mainly used this parking. The Staff recommends that all parking be eliminated from the east side of the 6500 block of Drew Avenue in order to accommodate the redesigning of that street. SECTION B: Requests on which the staff recommends denial of request. 1. A request to switch the stop signs at the intersection of Londonderry and Biscayne Boulevard from Londonderry to Biscayne Boulevard. Presently there are stop signs for northbound and southbound Londonderry and none for eastbound and westbound Biscayne Boulevard. The requestor who lives a block away from this intersection and is fairly new to the neighborhood feels that the vehicles eastbound on Biscayne Boulevard TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW June 5, 2001 Page 4 gather speed as they come down a hill to the intersection with Londonderry and continue to go too fast as they continue east. The requestor is concerned for her children that bike and walk in this area. This area has had no accidents reported from January 1, 1997 to December 31, 2000. This is an area with no sidewalks. Both Biscayne Boulevard and Londonderry are fairly quiet residential streets serving the local neighborhood. A traffic volume and speed survey was done on Biscayne Boulevard approximately 100 feet east of the intersection of Londonderry on the hill as Biscayne Boulevard comes down to the intersection. The average weekday traffic was 234 vehicles with 217 on Saturday and 176 on Sunday. The 85- percentile speed was 32 miles per hour on weekdays with 31 miles per hour on Saturday and 32 miles per hour on Sunday. Out of 1,328 vehicles in the survey six of them, two eastbound and four westbound, were at 40 plus miles per hour. A traffic volume survey was also done on Londonderry just south of the intersection. The weekday average was 362 vehicles, with 320 on Saturday and 260 on Sunday. The staff feels there are no warrants to require a switch of the stop signs at this intersection and recommend a denial of the request. SECTION C: Requests which are deferred to a later date or referred to others. 1. A request to eliminate the MTC bus stop on Concord Avenue at West 58th Street. Requestor feels that the MTC bus stop creates a hazard for children crossing Concord Avenue at West 58th Street on their way to and from schools at Concord Elementary and Southview Middle School. Presently the south parking lot of Southview Middle School is being used as a park and ride and Concord and West 58th Street is where MTC picks up and drops off riders for that location. Concord Avenues has no sidewalks on the east side of the street but there are sidewalks on west side of the street that connect Concord Elementary, Southview Middle School and the Community Center. TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW June 5, 2001 Page 5 There have been no reported accidents at the intersection of Concord and West 58th from January 1, 1997 to December 31, 2000. The school district has apparently rescinded the agreement with MTC on use of the parking lot as a park and ride just recently, and MTC is in the process of reviewing their options in this situation. No further action required at this time. (City Council passed resolution on June 5th requesting route change) r L>J REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item IV.B. From: GORDON L. HUGHES Consent El CITY MANAGER Information Only ❑ Date: JUNE 199 2001 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: SOUTHWEST METRO ❑ Motion PUBLIC SAFETY TRAINING ❑ Resolution FACILITY ❑ Ordinance ® Discussion INFORMATION/BACKGROUND: On June 5, 2001, the Council considered the joint powers agreement and land lease with respect to the Southwest Metro Public Safety Training Facility proposed for the southwest corner of Braemar Park. The Council continued consideration until the June 19, 2001, meeting. The Council directed staff to , consult with training facility partners (Bloomington, Eden Prairie and MAC) to determine if a two to three month delay in Edina's consideration of the agreements was problematic. This delay was considered to allow time to evaluate if the site for the proposed facility should be reserved for park and recreation purposes. Following the June 5th meeting, I spoke with the city managers of Bloomington and Eden Prairie as well as the chief of the airport police department concerning the possible delay. While all expressed disappointment, all stated that such a delay would not cause them to reconsider their position in the venture. REPORT/RECOMMENDATION - SOUTHWEST METRO TRAINING FACILITY, June 19, 2001 Page two STATE GRANT Based upon conversations with Department of Public Safety staff, we believe that a two or three month delay would not necessarily jeopardize the $500,000 grant for the facility received from the State of Minnesota. It should be noted, however, that the application for this grant was based upon the Edina site. A revised application would need to be submitted if the facility were to be built in another city. Given the competitive nature of the selection process, DPS staff was concerned that a new site may be viewed as a significant change in the original application and could jeopardize the grant. DPS staff hesitated in providing a more definitive response noting that the specifics of a new site would need to be considered. (A key strength of our application for state funding was that our facility was much farther along from the planning and commitment standpoint than other competing applications.) ARE OTHER SITES AVAILABLE IN OTHER CITIES? -During my conversations with our partners, we discussed alternate sites for the facility should the Council decide to reserve the Braemar site for park purposes. None of our partners currently controls a site suitable for the training facility. However, the City of Eden Prairie is currently negotiating the purchase of property in the vicinity of Flying Cloud Airport that will be used for public works purposes. Apparently, this site contains excess property that, in the view of the city manager, would be suitable for the training facility. Although this site would presumably be acceptable to Bloomington, MAC's police chief has expressed reservations concerning added travel distance noting that its central location is a key advantage of the Edina site. The schedule for the acquisition of the Eden Prairie site is unknown. CONSEQUENCES OF RELOCATING FACILITY If the facility were relocated to one of our partner's cities, Edina's cash contribution would increase from approximately $200,000 to approximately $1,150,000. If the relocation resulted in the loss of the State grant, Edina's share would increase by an additional $100,000. Edina's share of the facility's operating expenses would remain the same regardless of the facility's location, i.e. about $39,000 annually. However, Edina would lose the advantages associated with having the facility in the City. These advantages include 1) the ability to provide training to personnel while they are on duty rather than on a "call back" or overtime basis 2) an increased opportunity to use the facility for training due to its close proximity and 3) the ability to offer public shooting and firearms safety classes to Edina residents. E REPORT/RECOMMENDATION - SOUTHWEST METRO TRAINING FACILITY June 19, 2001 Page three On the other hand, the relocation of the facility also provides the opportunity for the City to use the subject property for other purposes it deems more desirable. USE OF SITE FOR PARK AND RECREATIONAL PURPOSES CONSIDERED BY BLUE RIBBON COMMITTEE Architects working with the Blue Ribbon Committee evaluated the subject property for a gymnasium field house. Their analysis is attached. The architects concluded that either a three gym or four gym field house would fit on the subject property. (The configuration shown on their study would appear to necessitate significant retaining walls along the west side of the field house.) The estimated cost of a three -gym field house was $10,330,000. A fourth gym would add approximately $2,200,000 to the cost. The architects also estimated annual operating costs (exclusive of staffing) for the facility. These costs ranged from $61,300 to about $75,000 not including staff. When staffing costs are included, annual facility operating costs would be substantially higher. (Hopkins Lindbergh Center which is a five- gymnasium facility measuring 96,000 square feet in area reported annual operating expenses, including staff, of $360,000 in 1998. This facility is not air conditioned.) We would assume that user fees and donations would defray a portion „of such costs. The Blue Ribbon Committee rejected the concept of a free standing field house principally due to high operating costs and the inconvenience of utilizing the facility during the,school day. The Blue Ribbon Committee did not formally evaluate the subject property for uses other than a field house. However, Mr. Keprios advises that this site was informally considered as an alternate site for the air supported dome originally proposed for Kuhlman Field. In our opinion, such a structure could physically fit on the site. However, if such a facility were desirable, it would be prudent to combine the golf dome and a sports dome into one facility rather than to have two freestanding domes within a quarter mile of each other. Further research would be needed to determine if the existing golf dome site, the site north or Braemar Arena, the subject property or some other site would be best for such a facility. OTHER USES FOR THE SITE Were it not used for the training facility, other uses might include: • Doie Parr The Park and Recreation Department prepared a report concerning possible dog park locations in the City. The subject property would likely be suitable for such purposes. REPORT/RECOMMENDATION - SOUTHWEST METRO TRAINING FACILITY June 19, 2001 Page four • Outdoor Soccer /FootbalULacrosseIRu -eby Field. The subject property could be developed with an outdoor multi - purpose athletic field (one large field or two small fields.) Public Works/Park Department Outdoor Storage. The City is rapidly running out of property for street sweepings, wood chips, storm debris etc. The subject property would be suitable for such a use. SUMMARY Based upon my research since June 5, 2001, meeting, I have concluded the following: • Our training facility partners are disappointed but will continue to participate if the Council decides to table the issue for two to three months. • No other sites currently owned by our partners are available for the training facility. • Eden Prairie is negotiating the acquisition of a site that they believe would be suitable for the facility. However, MAC may not agree with this location. • A two or three month delay in the project will likely not jeopardize the State grant. However, the substitution of a new site for the Braemar site may be a problem. • The relocation of the site to another city will be of financial consequence to the City, but would free up the site for other uses. • If the site were used for a freestanding field house, the City should anticipate construction costs of about $10,300,000 to about $12,500,000 depending upon the number of gymnasiums and annual operating costs of $300,000+ based upon the Hopkins Lindbergh experience. User fees and donations could offset a portion of the operating costs. • Other potential uses include an air supported dome, a multi - purpose outdoor athletic field, a dog park, and an outdoor public works /park maintenance storage area. More research would be needed to evaluate these uses. IN` F-00- z z , je .0e -'�- p i D. Three -Gym Field House at Braemar Site (49,000 GSF): $10,330,000 1. Entrance/ lobby/ reception area; 2. Three collegiate sized basketball courts with associated volleyball courts; 3. Four lane running/ walking track (gym level only); 4. Two stop elevator; 5. Public toilets on two levels with changing area on the lower level; 6. Athletic equipment storage rooms; 7. Concession stand and storage; 8. Three sets of bleachers each having a capacity to seat 50; 9. Bleacher storage area; 10. Wood center playing court (without running track overlaid); 11. Cushioned surface running track and end courts; 12. Scoreboards and backstops for each court; 13. Automatic netting dividers for all playing courts. 14. Elevated walking/ running track; 15. On site parking r Estimated project Cost Breakdown Construction Costs Soft Costs* Item Project Name GSF $ /GSF 2000$ 33% Project Costs A Kuhlman Stadium - Renovation 10,800 0.19 2,000 660 $ 2,660 B Edina Community Center - Campus Improvements 1,002,000 330,660 $ 1,332,660 C.1 Edina High School - Baseball Field 367,000 121,308 $ 488,908 C.2 Edina High School - Softball Fields 705,000 232,650 $ 937,650 C3 Edina High School - Lower Soccer Fields 279,000 92,070 $ 371,070 CA Edina High School - Upper Soccer Fields 360,000 118,800 $ 478,800 C.5 Edina High School - Main Soccer Field 250,000 82,500 $ 332,500 0.1 Field House at Braemar Site - 3 Gyms 49,000 158.49 7,766,000 2,562,780 $ 10,328,780 D.2 Field House at Braemar Site - 4th Gym 10,920 154.30 1,685,000 556,050 $ 2,241,050 E.1 Concord Elementary - Classroom Addition 9,360 128.21 1,200,000 396,000 $ 1,596,000 E.2 Concord Elementary - First Gym Addition 9,360 206.73 1,935,000 638,550 $ 2,573,550 E.3 Concord Elementary - Second Gym Addition 10,400 175.00 1,820,000 600,600 $ 2,420,600 F Large Community Center - Gym Renovation 13,000 1.81 23,500 7,755 $ 31,255 G Small Community Center - Gym Renovation 6,000 32.12 192,700 63,591 $ 256,291 A Community Center - Gym Lobby & Concession 4,600 35.76 164,500 54,285 $ 218,785 I Community Center - Theater Renovation 12,420 83.82 1,041,000 343,530 $ 1,384,530 J.1 Creek Valley Elementary - Gym Addition 10,000 185.70 1,857,000 612,810 $ 2,469,810 J.2 Creek Valley - Soccer Fields 40,000 13,200 $ 53,200 K.1 South View Middle - Gym Addition 10,000 191.20 1,912,000 630,960 $ 2,542,960 K.2 South View Middle - Gym Improvements 10,000 24.44 244,400 80,652 $ 325,052 K.3 South View Middle - Pool Improvements 339,000 111,870 $ 450,870 L.1 Valley View Middle - Gym Addition 19,000 139.79 2,656,000 876,480 $ 3,532,480 L.2 Valley View - Locker Addition 6,150 183.90 1,131,000 373,230 $ 1,504,230 L3 Valley View Pool Addition - Option A 21,460 144.45 3,100,000 1,023,000 $ 4,123,000 LA Valley View Pool Addition - Option B 27,260 131.11 3,574,000 1,179,420 $ 4,753,420 M Normandale Elementary - Playground 226,000 74,580 $ 300,580 * "Soft costs" include the following: bonding costs, predesign fees, design fees, construction management fees, furniture, fixtures, equipment, telecommunications, security equipment, commissioning fees, project contingency, and an inflation factor to the midpoint of construction. It does not include costs associated with hazardous material surveys or abatement or the owner's project management. Annual Building Operating Cost Estimates: (no staffing) Braemar Field House: (49,000SF X $1.25 / GSF) $61,300 Braemar Field House 4'b Gym: (10,920SF X $1.25 / GSF) $13,650 Concord Class and Gym Addition: (28,000 SF X $1.25 / GSF) $35,000 Southview Gymnasium Addition: (10,000 SF X $1.25 / GSF) $12,500 Creek Valley Gymnasium Addition: (10,000 SF X $1.25 / GSF) $12,500 Valley View Gymnasium Addition: (19,000 SF X $1.25 / GSF) $23,800 Valley View Pool -25m: (21,460 SF X $5.75 / GSF) $123,400 Valley View Pool -50m: (27,260 SF X $6.56 / GSF) $178,930 Valley View Lockers: (6,150 SF X $5.75 / GSF) $35,400 Annual Field Maintenance Cost Estimates: Baseball Field: $6,600 Softball Field: $2,600 Soccer Field: $5,800 AGENDA ITEM: IV.B. June 19, 2001 Mayor Dennis Maetzold Member of Edina City Council City Administrator Gordon Hughes 4801 W. 5oth Street Edina, MN 55424 Ladies and Gentlemen: I understand that tonight at the City Council meeting, the Council will be discussing the use and contribution of City land in regards to a joint fire and police safety training facility. I am unable to attend this meeting, but please consider this letter public input on this topic and have it entered into the Council meeting minutes. As a strong supporter of the recent City park and recreational facilities referendum, I want to encourage the Council to postpone any decision about using City land for any purpose until a thorough review of all remaining options for rec facilities can be completed. First and foremost, thanks to the City. Council for its support of the referendum. Although we did not achieve success, several positive outcomes occurred from the vote including a better understanding of what the community wants and needs. I will summary what I believe the message to be: • The citizens of Edina do want new and updated rec facilities. Over 5700 voted in support of the referendum. I believe many more would support a scaled down project. • The citizens of Edina do not want a joint project with the School District. Although the plan was well conceived, I believe the message from the community is for the City to provide facilities without joining with the schools. Furthermore, if these conclusions are the case: 1. Any revised project for City.rec facilities will require City land. 2. Braemar likely would be the highest and best use for a City project based on land needs, proximity to transportation, parking and other factors. 3. Giving up any land at Braemar now would close the door on an option for additional park and rec facilities. Again, I would ask the Council to defer any decision that would commit the use of land at Braemar until all alternatives for recreational facilities have been explored. I know I speak on behalf of many citizens of Edina and community groups in this regard. I am also committed to assisting the Council and staff as needed to explore the viable options that will bring needed facilities to the City of Edina. Thank you in advance for your consideration. Sincerely, Richard M. Ward 6809 Galway Drive Edina, MN 55439 AGENDA ITEM: IV.B. June 17, 2001 Edina City Council Dear Edina City Council, This letter is in support of the Public Safety Training Center to be built at Braemar. Clearly this is a facility that is long over due. This facility is crucial to the success of both the police and fire department with in Edina. There are several reasons why this idea should be considered and implemented First, the contribution on the part of the city is minimal. $250,000 and 3 acres is a small price to pay for a facility that can become an income generator. If marketed correctly, this facility could be used by departments all over the country. Second, no longer would the city have to pay to send our employees to other facilities to be trained The money saved over the years would add up quickly. Finally and most important is the benefit of training. Training our police and fire is crucial. You only have to look as far as the morning paper to see what properly trained individuals can do when they are forced to act. In addition, we can clearly see what happens when proper training is not instituted The rejection of the parks referendum was unfortunate. I voted for it because I want Edina to continue to thrive and be the best place to live. Going back on your word on the training facility does not solve the park referendum issue. People felt we had enough parks which is why it was voted down. Giving 3 acres of land to a good cause is not going to hurt the cities recreation space. I hope you will consider this project a worthwhile investment into the men and women that protect this city every day. Sincerely, s Rafiidal AGENDA ITEM: IV.B. June 16,2001 Dear City Council Members, We would like to address the recent interest in the training facility that is being proposed for the city of Edina. As a settled family in the community, we would like to express our support and confidence in this opportunity. We realize that there are many different uses that are being put forth for this plot of land, but believe the training facility would be the best and most optimistic. When will we, as a city ever again have the chance to build a building and at the same time save millions of dollars? This would not just be a building, but a place for our officers and fire department to train and better their already superb skills. Yes, Edina is known for its beauty, . hidden ponds and recreational areas... that is why this facility would be crucial, there is not anything like it in the metro area. Sincerely, Todd and Karin Miller 4804 School Road. AGENDA ITEM: IV.B. June 16, 2001 City Council City of Edina Edina, MN Dear Council Members: I am writing to you in response to the article in the Sun Newspaper dated June 13, 2001 regarding the Public Safety Training Facility to be located on the parcel of land near Braemar Park. Edina has had a reputation for lovely, well maintained parks. We have seemed to fill many needs for walkers, bikers, runners, handicapped individuals and so on. In actuality, we are well supplied with recreation areas. We are compelling you to allow this land to be turned into a training facility. Now it is time to keep our police and fire departments competitive. This can be accomplished at a relatively conservative cost. There is a great need to support those who protect us and allow them to keep their skills sharp and up to a level that we expect and appreciate. Bob & Sue Rofidal AGENDA ITEM IV.B. Eric Anderson From: Richard Ward [RWARD1 @mn.rr.com] Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 9:38 PM To: Dennis Maetzold; Eric Anderson; Gordon Hughes Cc: Ted Brinkman; Linda Presthus; Gregg Bjork Subject: City Council meeting June 19 To: Dennis Maetzold, Gordon Hughes, Eric Anderson From: Dick Ward Re: City Council meeting June 19 Gentlemen- Page 1 of 1 It has come to my attention that the Edina City Council will be addressing the use of Braemar land at its next Council meeting. In light of the recent referendum, as a citizen and a representative of the Edina Basketball Association, I am encouraging any decision on the use of city land at Braemar to be tabled by Council until further review of City recreational facilities needs as it may relate to the need for land at Braemar. Unfortunately, I am unable to be at the Council meeting, otherwise I would attend and make this request personally. I intend to provide written correspondence to each member of the Council in regards to my comments prior to the meeting. If any of you have the specific email addresses for each Council member, I would appreciate that information so that I might forward that corresponce by email. Also, I expect that a representative of the Edina Basketball Association will be in attendance on June 19 to voice the same concern about the use of City land at Braemar until all alternative options have been explored in detail. Thanks in advance for your response, Dick Ward home phone 952 - 942 -5523 home email rwardl(a)mn.rr.com work phone 763 - 847 -7321 work email rward _mjsk.com 6/15/01 AGENDA ITEM IV•B K vV Thomas J. White Klein & White Direct Line 952 - 835 -9800 Attorneys & Counselors Suite 100 4570 W. 77th Street Minneapolis, MN 55435 June 15, 2001 (952) 835 -9800 Fax (982) 835 -5959 VIA HAND AND U.S. MAIL The Honorable Dennis Maetzold City of Edina Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424' RE: Proposed Police and Fire Training Facility Dear Mayor Maetzold: I write as chair of the Edina Park Board. At the April 12, 2001, Park Board meeting, the Park Board unanimously voted to "recommend to the City Council that they adamantly decline the opportunity to have a Police /Fire training facility at Braemar and that it be moved to a different municipality that has more open space." The Edina Park Board will never advocate or support the sale of park land. Edina is landlocked. Except for a sliver of land behind the York Avenue Fire Station, the Braemar site is the only undeveloped park land in the city of Edina. If we sell this property, we will be selling the last undeveloped park land of any significance. The Park Board fully supports the Police and Fire Departments of Edina. We believe that they are among the best in the metropolitan area. We recognize that it is important for these employees to obtain the training that they need. However, we adamantly oppose using the Braemar site for that purpose. There are many other cities nearby with available land that would be more appropriate hosts. With the failure of the Referendum, the Edina Park Board and the City of Edina need to identify all possible areas where park improvements can be made, in order to improve the park system. The Park Board believes that the Edina Park and Recreation facilities significantly add to the allure and appeal of Edina. If we sell park land, we are forever foreclosing our opportunity to improve areas for the residents of Edina. The Park Board also believes that there are many other municipalities where this might be more appropriate. An ambitious plan of this sort may not be appropriate for the The Honorable Dennis Maetzold Page 2 June 15, 2001 Braemar site, with such close proximity to the hockey arena which serves many children and young teens. Furthermore, as a landlocked city, any site is too dear to give up for any price. We recognize that financially it makes sense to develop this property in the way suggested by the Police and Fire Departments. Then again, it makes financial sense to sell all of the parks and develop them in other ways. However, we do not believe that such a plan is best for the citizens of Edina. We urge the City Council to reject the proposed plan, and work with the Park Board in an effort to develop this land in a way that can best serve the citizens of Edina. Y, omas J. White ttorney at Law TJW /jmh cc: Park Board Members EDINA CRIME PREVENTION FUND Box 390231, Edina, Minnesota 55439 -0231 RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT FOR POLICE AND FIRE TRAINING CENTER WHEREAS, the Edina Crime Prevention Fund was formed 31 years ago to assist in criminal apprehension, and WHEREAS, 12 years ago the Edina Crime Prevention Fund started financially supporting the cities Crime Prevention Coordinator, and WHEREAS, the Edina Crime Prevention Fund has become even more aware of the needs of Edina Police Department due to the recent unfortunate circumstance, and WHEREAS, the culmination of these makes the Edina Crime Prevention Fund Board members very attuned to the need of constant training and education of its police officers, and WHEREAS, members of the Crime Prevention Fund Board are also aware of the need to train its Fire and Paramedic personnel, and WHEREAS, the City of Edina will realize a million dollar savings in original costs and substantial savings in annual training costs, and WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota has also recognized the need for training public safety personnel with financial support, and WHEREAS the new training facility can continue the original park mission of the Wipperman Gun Range to offer youth gun safety training, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT BE RESOLVED, that the Edina Crime Prevention Fund Board wholeheartedly encourage the City Council to move forward on the joint efforts of Edina, Bloomington, Eden Prairie, and Metropolitan Airport Commission to construct a Police and Fire Training Facility at Braemar. The motion was made to adopt the above resolution and was unanimously approved by the Edina Crime Prevention Board at its meeting of June 15, 2001. TO: Mayor & Council Members FROM: Susan Heiberg DATE: June 19, 2001 SUBJECT: SENIOR NEIGHBORHOOD COORDINATOR REPORURECOMMENDATION Agenda Item IV . C . Consent ❑ Information Only Mgr. Recommends Action To HRA ❑ To Council ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ElDiscussion Background: Greg Winter, Human Relations Commissioner, will present a proposal for a Senior Neighborhood Coordinator which the Commission developed as a result of information provided by Senior Outreach, a human services program funded by the City of Edina through Senior Community Services. Currently, frail elderly Edina residents are served by Senior Outreach and Bloomington Public Health with care coordination and counseling. However, these agencies have not provided an assessment of existing or. potential - volunteer support services ( "informal networks ") for the frail elderly or any coordination of existing networks. The lack of both assessment and coordination of informal networks (i.e. faith communities, social organizations and local associations) thus presents a gap in the existing scheme of service. The frail elderly might be able to experience an increase in the quality of their lives if they could be linked to an informal volunteer neighborhood network. Initial funding commitments would be for a one -year "network assessment" phase through a hired coordinator. During this first phase, data collection and assessment would be the central undertaking with the following goals for the second phase: • Identify the needs of the frail elderly that could be met by informal networks; • Benchmark similar programs in other communities around methods for providing an outside coordinating, function; • Meet with informal networks to develop an understanding of the needs of the frail elderly in a given neighborhood and develop a specific plan for meeting those needs; • Be available to informal networks to share resources and insights /experiences; and • Assess the outcomes from informal networks' operations and report those outcomes to the City. It is anticipated that the second phase would last for a one -year period following the year in which the network assessment phase is completed. Determinations about permanently funding the coordinator position would be made during the second year. To summarize: The goal for this proposed coordinator position is to organize neighbors and other community volunteers to provide appropriate assistance to frail elderly Edina residents to help them remain in their community and to be effectively connected to informal and formal support systems. X, 4 � alt, Z, - 7 � �7, �7 77 /; I Alliance of Neighborhoods - Edina Chapter Citizens Opposed To The Dan Patch Commuter Rail Line June 19, 2001 Dear Edina Mayor and City Council Members, It is our sincere determination that the development of the Dan Patch rail line, as a high -speed commuter rail corridor would have a far more negative, than positive impact on our community. We arrive at this based on two main factors. They are the current condition of the rail bed and the environment in which it passes through, or more accurately is now surrounded by. The success and financial soundness of a high -speed commuter rail corridor project is contingent on the availability of an existing high -speed rail bed. Without a ready rail bed, located in an area that would draw passengers, makes such a project cost prohibitive. The key in a high -speed commuter rail line is using an existing rail bed to avoid the high cost of building one. On this point, since the North Star and Red Rock currently function as high speed freight lines their development may make financial sense while their transportation value is open to debate. In contrast the Dan Patch rail line is in severe disrepair and is currently rated for only 10 -mph traffic. The entire rail bed would need to be rebuilt at an exorbitant cost to taxpayers. In addition the Dan Patch rail line is located in an environment of single family homes. Some 183,449 people live along the length of the line, 85% of the homes are owner occupied and concentrated in the cities of Lakeville, Savage, Bloomington, Edina and St. Louis Park. Many of the homes are very close to the track; many are as close as 60 feet. This raises issues of lowered home values, condemning and buying homes, safety, noise, pollution, health and quality of life. After considering the magnitude of the impact on our community we see this rail project as incompatible with our interests and the Vision 20-20 plan set forth by the City of Edina. For many a big concern is derailment or a fire caused by increased train traffic. There are 10,000 train derailments per year on similar rail lines. Experts say it is not a matter of if, but when it would happen. The Dan Patch was the cause of a brush fire in Bloomington under its current limited use. In case of such an accident, access to the site would be difficult because of the close proximity of homes that enclose the line on both sides here in Edina. In contrast the North Star and Red Rock lines pass through few if any communities of close, single- family housing. It is with these issues and concerns in mind that we submit this citizen petition in opposition to the development of the Dan Patch high -speed corridor. With this we ask for your consideration and support. Thank you, `Z�oc.c�.►cl��� Laurie McNamara Jim Welby Larry Baer Brien A. Martin 651 - 220 -4166 or visit www.geocities.com/danpatchrail. JUN. 14. 2001 LOOPED DAKOTA COUNTY PAYS UEV ADYIN N0, 3588 P. 2 • What Happens .Next? Open House comments transmitted to Technical and Policy Committees Station locations confirmed for next steps in analysis Technical work begins to estimate ridership and costs, identify transportation and community issues More Open Houses mid - winter and next spring Study concludes next summer with Policy Committee findings sent to I-M Solutions Alliance. Alliance forwards findings to Minnesota Department of Transportation. AN PATcy CORRIDOR Feasibility 1 ' Forward findings Yes, Feasible pp- No Decision PPP No, Not 1 • Potential next steps: • • • •••. • •'• • •■' •• • AN PATcy CORRIDOR High Speed Commuter Rail Considered For Edina Neighborhoods The proposed Dan Patch commuter rail line would run from Northfield to Minneapolis, cutting through communities including Bloomington, Edina and St. Louis Park. The development of the Dan Patch line or any similar rail line as a high -speed commuter line will have an adverse impact on the community's home values, safety, noise, pollution, health and quality of life in which it is located Some Key Facts About the Dan Patch Line There are 183,449 people living within 2,500 feet of the line between Lakeville and downtown Minneapolis. 85% of the homes in this area are owner occupied There are 11,910 businesses within 5,000 feet There are 131 schools and parks within 2,500 feet of the line There is a bill in the House and Senate, which would give each city along the Dan Patch line the ability to approve or reject proposed designs. House Bill #HF0137 and Senate Bill #SFO119 These bills provide the citizens of the communities directly impacted, a means of participation in the decision making process at the local level. Providing those most affected with a voice in the project and fair consideration and treatment. at is the COST? The cost is very high - 347 million to construct and 14.6 million per year operate and maintain. The operating cost for commuter rail per mile is more than twice the cost of the average bus system and more than five times the cost of an express bus system. These high costs would be subsidized by higher local taxes. The U.S. Department of Transportation's own data shows that the cost per new rider exceeds the cost of leasing each of those riders a new luxury car for the rest of their lives. Property values along the route will be reduced as a result of the commuter rail trains. A total of 183,449 people live within 833 yards of the proposed line between Lakeville and downtown Minneapolis. The Dan Patch rail line is in severe disrepair and is currently rated for only 10 -mph traffic. The entire rail bed would need to be rebuilt at an exorbitant cost to taxpayers. The Dan Patch rail line is located in an environment of single - family homes. 85% of the homes are owner occupied and concentrated in the cities of Lakeville, Savage, Bloomington, Edina and St. Louis Park. Many of the homes are very close to the track; many are as . close as 60 feet. This raises issues of lowered home values, condemning and buying homes, safety, noise, pollution, health and quality of life. After considering the magnitude of the impact on our community we see this rail project as incompatible with our interests and the Vision 20 -20 plan set forth by the City of Edina. Who will USE Commuter Rail The proposed commuter trains will be powered by diesel fuel and will travel at high speeds - up to 79 miles per hour, cutting a swath through Edina residential, and park and fecreational areas. As many as 12 commuter trains per day would travel on the route. An unspecified number of freight trains carrying various types of freight would also travel on the same route during undefined hours of the day and night. Total number of commuters per day using the route will be very small - projected by the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MN- DOT) only 2,462 to 4,700 riders daily in 2005. Studies show that commuter rail has an insignificant effect on the number of automobiles using the freeway. Most riders of commuter rail live within walking distance from one of the stations and within walking distance from their stop where they leave the train to go to work, etc. This is a limiting factor for ridership and does little to relieve freeway traffic congestion. Is it SAFE? For many a big concern is derailment of fire caused by increased train traffic. There are 10,000 train derailments per year on similar rail lines. Experts say it is not a matter of if, but when it would happen. The Dan Patch was the cause of a brush fire in Bloomington under its current limited use. In case of such an accident, access to the site would be difficult because of the close proximity of homes that enclose the line on both sides in Edina. There are a total of 61 road crossings on the proposed route. Each crossing would hold the potential for a catastrophic accident with school buses and other automotive traffic. There are also concerns regarding emergency response (ambulance, firefighters, etc.) that could be delayed at the crossings during an emergency. The proposed route runs adjacent to a number of park/recreational areas. Children and adults use these areas. High -speed commuter trains would pose a safety threat to anyone wanting to gain access to these parks. Of particular concern is the safety of the community's children. There are 131 schools and parks within 833 yards of the proposed rail line. Citizens Petition We,,as the signers below, are opposed to the conversion of the existing Dan Patch L Railroad Line for use as a high -speed commuter rail line connecting Northfield with downtown Minneapolis. Therefore we. so opposed to the above stated conversion, freely petition the City of Edina and Minnesota State Legislature to take an active roll in opposing the said conversion of the existing Dan Patch L Railroad Line for use as a high -speed commuter rail line. sponsord by the Alliance of Neighborhoods - Edina Chapter Date Na1ne Address Phone Number 1 � 4 I().5•cD T i✓f✓ Al.:i r�� tx S W P 'D — i Y W- 11 12 .�� /- Dy Lr� iF 5��?v .Sx`cccc - 41 7 13 , IC 14 6� 017Y 1 I �: / �_ ���Q V-�l �il a \.j ,7// 7l ll. v ��� J Y 1 rN/l��•� / 4�"� / v U�/ ��V -� � vr- _ 16 '611 gl Da4L L� #bb, q�17 Uplxr j-.f(` I)m - 91�j& 0 -`' i iJ /t 1 Citizens Petition We, as the signers below, are opposed to the conversion of the existing Dan Patch L Railroad Line for use as a high -speed commuter rail line connecting Northfield with downtown Minneapolis. Therefore we, so opposed to the above stated conversion, freely petition the City of Edina and Minnesota State Legislature to take an active roll in opposing the said conversion of the existing Dan Patch L Railroad line for use as a high -speed commuter rail line. Date sponsord by the Alliance of Neighborhoods - Edina Chapter N e Address Phone Number 2 a . D U • �g c- �� ` o�. — 4 %, 1� � vr7J3 /.�.f -� Al-e- 5 �� `� Q 8 10 12 Qr� Cf 134 /;X q o-� /' i0,3 & &1! 3 - O 3 14 7 L 16 9),� 11 �; Z,) L"'. -7o( iL A,<_- < 7, ! 1Tlam; SZ- -T3G' vim? 19 5 - `aO? - O 20 __2 I" ,z2. i�J �►,� sB�cQ �� S� 9s� - 9�� -qs�� y Citizens Tetition We, as the signers below, are opposed to the conversion of the existing Dan Patch L Railroad Line for use as a high -speed commuter rail line connecting Northfield with downtown Minneapolis. Therefore we, so opposed to the above stated conversion, freely petition the City of Edina and Minnesota State Legislature to take an active roll in opposing the said conversion of the existing Dan Patch L Railroad Line for use as a high -speed commuter rail line. sponsord by the Alliance of Neighborhoods - Edina Chapter Date Name Address Phone Number 2 ZS 3 41e 9 5 /C 5' '0 6 �� o v cr'� 8 �D —Joe> nl (,tJn( fr S bS i� �f(.ci h- ?¢ T -- /d-,I-'h •� � b. '11�n� 1 "1 q LH - 7l z-' 10 ! - ZS-= vrG-- .�- a-L-e- S o 'i IEakw V -00 (,��,.� �i2�.�11Z NN13 - � () %) r� I Jr, c i 11, M N 18 19 l 25 20 tO�Kla000 21 1r] (ZQC V 40.6 s- zz/ G- -4M ? b-154 37 r s 1 Y,� Citizens Petition We, as the signers below, are opposed to the conversion of the existing Dan Patch L Railroad Line for use as a high -speed commuter rail line connecting Northfield with downtown Minneapolis. Therefore we, so opposed to the above stated conversion, freely petition the -City of Edina and Minnesota State Legislature to take an active roll in opposing the said conversion of the existing Dan Patch L Railroad Line for use as a high -speed commuter rail line. sponsord by the Alliance of Neighborhoods - Edina Chapter Date Name Address Phone Number 2 3,. 4 e LC_ C 5 /0 6 s 9 !0 2� OU 12 cl 13 (61 1 ( 14 Cat 15 4 P -- PR.31> 31(o Lt�N z i 9yy -�7l� I-Jq yaa 51i / -G &70c) C1914,C( i'Z� 9- / -of 7a � � N WOO MAX a ;;QW I o � of w /.o : S-i n /IL IA 95-7- 921 �9Gs ��a -yQ, D. Job /�nro n -- 7 7�� stl L W1 kA-1 F t T LAZ A d1,,Y4 9y/r�->> 7 Citizens Petition We, as ,the signers below, are opposed to the conversion of the existing Dan Patch L Railroad Line for use as a high -speed commuter rail line connecting Northfield with downtown Minneapolis. Therefore we, so opposed to the above stated conversion, freely petition the City of Edina and Minnesota State Legislature to take an active roll in opposing the said conversion of the existing Dan Patch L Railroad Line for use as a high -speed commuter rail line. sponsord by the Alliance of Neighborhoods - Edina Chapter Date Name Address Phone Number ZI 4 r e 1-7lo p ti 51 �1: ►�DZ�v �22 6 914, C 14C L Y(O& 10 ! a! -�d% 1' Aae gR.Cy - i m a 11 �6- O-L F4 12 13 (we,. 952- 9aOa67Z 7 0 _ X14; y l a T 16 5 z - Z6 - 'W5 1 s 1 LP c -z vt S o 5 ��:z2a 19 ��ti �-t cc: I ✓ l -i l ,� 1 Gt �-c . z �- iv ' % 7 20 '� � � G � r;� � C` rl� {; y 3 IJ 21 Ja,� v + .t Yi e Ohl h .5 l DS (1/ / ttke Citizens Petition We, as the signers below, are opposed to the conversion of the existing Dan Patch L Railroad Line for use as a high -speed commuter rail line connecting Northfield with downtown Minneapolis. Therefore we, so opposed to the above stated conversion, freely petition the City of Edina and Minnesota State Legislature to take an active roll in opposing the said conversion of the existing Dan Patch L Railroad Line for use as a high -speed commuter rail line. sponsord by the Alliance of Neighborhoods - Edina Chapter Date Name Address Phone Number 4:7 a 2 3 �,.nn�- �b 2-i C�4�� I� _ J2- L 2cJ 4 �/ 5 /(/.3,/ �S!'lj' ai&&4 Q oZC� �a7 J- 6 W-41 7 (o (3 f o�QUt,t ..-� 5 zS �,S' �l 3I 8 �e �� S�� i / Z s 1U 3 V/ 11 1 l �� %r4ft, R- N IP 4 l re, c 14v c.._ 36 5' Z Z 1231 NOelle ta)eiik -,o 5001 qMrOTW 307 -8l9O) 13 3 �J �541 ST Z,9, 867,6 4'/3 Aye 15 ��j�o?�G% �2�- -7/t3 17 Sao 7 18 T Citizens Petition We, as the signers below, are opposed to the conversion of the existing Dan Patch L Railroad Line for use as a high -speed commuter rail line connecting Northfield with downtown .Minneapolis. Therefore we, so opposed to the above stated conversion, freely petition the City of Edina and Minnesota State Legislature to take an active roll in opposing the said conversion of the existing Dan Patch L Railroad Line for use as a high -speed commuter rail line. Date sponsord by the Alliance of Neighborhoods - Edina Chapter Name Address Phone Number 2 102, o C, t.4>1 4 5G lZC s� �.-- �,�- -� 2 -2- 7 9 , �t -z (f- C' s ��� u 3 o H,-) ORMAN 6ai ;L / /�,�P� �.ev ���N� 9;Ls qa — 13 c)1.1 �-I'I I �YOO�s, c�C �✓ S °1— a S 14 g17-1 11 4,wq �5ZSZ �*7;r vQ qZ7 -o78�> 15 L�L ��; lc' � r>v h � c ;f' 4= y J / ,� �i 6: A' - �5 � . 16 /3 1710 18 /0 7 Wc5k -)C) I SiLclan Q OC � Xky __ iVA 6%' /, oo S4eyt �Jvi kl«cAl 6� 0/ -TkAC '4�/V 9S�- 9 V1 - 3 7Z _19 20 I17 �p b- �� -2-�' 21 c /I `7l n c � e /1 �Ja ..1 T Citizens Petition We, as the signers below, are opposed to the conversion of the existing Dan Patch L Railroad Line for use as a high -speed commuter rail line connecting Northfield with downtown Minneapolis. Therefore we, so opposed to the above stated conversion, freely petition the City of Edina and Minnesota State Legislature to take an active roll in opposing the said conversion of the existing Dan Patch L Railroad Line for use as a high -speed commuter rail line. sponsord by the Alliance of Neighborhoods - Edina Chapter 1 Date q- .Zo2-CO �N�a�me, 1L FFrRt) 6#U Address 5105 U) --,)5o� Phone Number 2 15 1 ' xL-L eA) JA-) ` 14 1 3 -vo C—QAGC RAYMo>JD Sio� �r�li�rt0�1D ct,ec�E 6229— iSL9 4 �' �✓r �� .areo RAYrynnfb h _ l l l �i 5 /L' -S -0O �lCl1��- D c/4 ,uoN LAZ 929 7/ S- �J U O ✓mot �(O�i -J Fy (fir `1ao -may �� v row e U s' /0s � ;c � -6c ��O s fo II2-10o `11I';-; C1 2Z - -,2qI Z 10 511?;, Nlur r__ 131 qZ2-?�91 Z 11 0 Ate"- Js'>Ghe, Aue -rue q_.a c - z 12 _ I'D 11 Z ���ate.j�,e4 12- )Qlvnek 4 1LZ -�77s 13 J a, 0L) Cv ,S J o lit•+ :.,/' 6� _ L 3 2 15 1 ' xL-L -A ^ r c/ 16,� 1 17 C> Ile . W 14 a S�A! 7 j- 18 1e /20 �� 2 I Q: c'1 win �} � 19 a ° - 3- 2 cU- l �i 20 21 r Citizens Petition We, as the signers below, are opposed to the conversion of the existing Dan Patch L Railroad Line for use as.a high - speed commuter rail line connecting Northfield with downtown Min neapo Lis. Therefore we, so opposed to the above stated conversion, freely petition the City of Edina and Minnesota State Legislature to take an active roll in opposing the said conversion of the existing Dan Patch L Railroad Line for use as a high -speed commuter rail line. sponsord by the Alliance of Neighborhoods - Edina Chapter Date Name a ( Address Phone Number �/ l �/D G�C 9S1 - 4Y/ —s F.e.(/ ic' e 2 9/ - n /.,/� 9� -Se�rl �am IP(Hv L n j" "I /_/i;re 952 " 9y 7 s q/a QAiOff,4 10��?,r V`_.�.t,.1 �..�► -,�J --►„ i�' � ! C� �,'�.e.c, t:.w' )a-� � � � 2 - `� � `F - �f � �' 6 51 G 1) Y 7 s q/a QAiOff,4 10��?,r V`_.�.t,.1 �..�► -,�J --►„ i�' � ! C� �,'�.e.c, t:.w' )a-� � � � 2 - `� � `F - �f � �' 51 G 1) Y 13 f(' /�� />?/��' �J ��1s�t c� �✓o' /%�� -C'�yu �. ..�� �5� �� - 5375! 14�/2t �Ni �iaOsF Yt3ArE(k�+r*+�tic r-YZ. 3SS7 15 c% Z I U 1 1 d V' y, Z Z- 0 a�o r 16 �' %Y G 17 �� � I �1'r�r��v+ eu l� ve Eo1•`ti4 $Zq- q I �t 18 21 1: _(L /Z TY2 Cl S Citizens Petition We, as the signers below, are opposed to the conversion of the existing Dan Patch L Railroad Line for use as a high -speed commuter rail line connecting Northfield with downtown Mifineapolis.Therefore we, so opposed to the above stated conversion, freely petition the City of Edina and Minnesota State Legislature to take an active roll in opposing the said conversion of the existing Dan Patch L Railroad Line for use as a high -speed commuter rail line. 14 �t 7 fti -ncr 15 6 2 S 16 F/ fkovl `r�t`�rl%,:1fis;U !of /(� C.1�°� /�rf� dr FQ/..v� 9Z�=27y2 n r 17 /u v crl. t< d lv f12 r 4 16 18 A cA 2-- 19 a a "d 20 21 sponsord by the Alliance of Neighborhoods - Edina Chapter Date Name Address •��, Phone Number 2 '7. 3 :��YIil2ei 5y. Wr 56yf C��G C CW 5 l7 �✓ • ��'' S� �1 9a� -�9s� 7 (� - 8 °Y. 3 L (;,/_ t w 2 0 - ZEE 9 o — 3 -12 3/ 7 10 � 91( (- y/3 V 11 C o cn frq.tt ve Road k J ha !41 A s -1o3� _ 12 l,�r�►� L���1� �U�( UtP.►�rJ ill U ��+�si9 �,� -��� 14 �t 7 fti -ncr 15 6 2 S 16 F/ fkovl `r�t`�rl%,:1fis;U !of /(� C.1�°� /�rf� dr FQ/..v� 9Z�=27y2 n r 17 /u v crl. t< d lv f12 r 4 16 18 A cA 2-- 19 a a "d 20 21 Citizens Petition We, as the signers below, are opposed to the conversion of the existing Dan Patch L Railroad Line for use as a high -speed commuter rail line connecting Northfield with downtown Minneapolis. Therefore we, so opposed to the above stated conversion, freely petition the City of Edina and Minnesota State Legislature to take an active roll in opposing the said conversion of the existing Dan Patch L Railroad Line for use. as a high -speed commuter rail line. sponsord by the Alliance of Neighborhoods - Edina Chapter Date Name Address Phone Number 1 W +'LLt Rte rU .11 rl`�c� �1 �� Ai�4<Vl�_W Da CI 1.1 -� %�" e L<- r1 �� 9 ?? -z ;y iC ELLT �1e �6 21-i- 7 9 9 ?? -z ;y Citizens Petition We, as the signers below, are opposed to the conversion of the existing Dan Patch L Railroad Line for use as a high -speed commuter rail line connecting Northfield with downtown Minneapolis. Therefore we, so opposed to the above stated conversion, freely petition the City of Edina and Minnesota State Legislature to take an active roll in opposing the said conversion of the existing Dan Patch L Railroad Line for use as a high -speed commuter rail line. sponsord by the Alliance of Neighborhoods - Edina Chapter Date Name Address Phone Number 3 1� s c 7 Z� -OD 8 t -di- � 9 9- :2-/ - 0 0 10 1-( --0 - -, i G� S713 � d� �aZ�' `33 e I ( e AL I 2A . sD DA, f2—?- - 7� hcA c� 6g2-y T13 —47� q as- 7� ,L I A�j - �� II 15 16 '� ✓ / ;�� / /r' / Y✓ i. i ,i' .tyres \ I \.•1.� � I � '\ � 1�� �V � E-- �.�'I± I ��/✓� L. 1: �?y� 18 IJ�V Citizens Petition We, as the signers below, are opposed to the conversion of the existing Dan Patch L Railroad Line for use as a high -speed commuter rail line connecting Northfield with downtown Minneapolis. Therefore we, so opposed to the above stated conversion, freely petition the City of Edina and Minnesota State Legislature to take an active roll in opposing the said conversion of the existing Dan Patch L Railroad Line for use as a high-speed commuter rail line. sponsord by the Alliance of Neighborhoods - Edina Chapter Date Name Address Phone Number �►. ssq34P 2 <7-14 - ao 3 4 po 5 e s 1d,1619 7 q11 8 1-14- o 6 sq -- /G- oo 12 13 14 q— 16 - OD 15 .• / ( - DCo 1s 17 '7 1`d 18 q- 1g q 16,- ob 20 21 F cro I eh'_ . A .2--1.1—'Y� - /G/ C 92,7 -�Ik5 -Z L `; P7 9� — ' zZ I? 3� z 9Z �e� G �2/ useti t C---OUt�q, M A1/53_FU �w 4v C/ Q2S —`t42 L Pi (o ZO Ek,Hsw 2e(. E4« W kA Ee%'hci AM S5'136 4 _ o a q *W'- M a h✓ ia' � L 6138 3 I eh'_ . A .2--1.1—'Y� - /G/ C 92,7 -�Ik5 -Z L `; Citizens Petition We, as the signers below, are opposed to the conversion of the existing Dan Patch L Railroad Line for use as a high -speed commuter rail line connecting Northfield with downtown Minneapolis. Therefore we, so opposed to the above stated conversion, freely petition the City of Edina and Minnesota State Legislature to take an active roll in opposing the said conversion of the existing Dan Patch L Railroad Line for use as a high -speed commuter rail line. sponsord by the Alliance of Neighborhoods - Edina Chapter Date Name Address Phone Number 1 902, 2 R I 11J, A 4 f( �-�� l Z ZgS- $ Y° 5 !Ct rd P Z " L 1 6 6 3� So Rk gzS- 3893 8 Gi ' 9 10� 7�OZ 11 �� 532 5 en+c n Ave Z 12 �l_� ��'�a•� -��-� f�i�c/�G col 9= ��% 13 Tt % .2,C� �, . o-� - 3o YoKK A U6. ?� a c�o- &y76 14 9 17 15 � 1 �( �� �1 3 t"W' — 7 7 L/ 7 OIL_ 18 _T2 o 19 20 /o/. JS 00 ��Nc� X'V qa9 -3�z3 21 Citizens Petition We, as signers below, are opposed to the conversion of the existing Dan Patch L Railroad Line for use as a high- speed commuter rail line connecting Northfield to downtown Mi nea oils. Therefore, we, so o°n_osed to the above stated conversion, freely petition the City of , Hennepin County and the Minnesota State Legislature to take an active roll in opposing the said conversion of the existing Dan Patch L Railroad Line for use as a high -speed commuter rail line. Sponsored by the Alliance of Neighborhoods - e Name Address 503 3 C - Phone Number LiL �5a 9a s 15'_/1Z:2_ q �0/2 1/71 a rt f cJ kuu vwL qtZ — iA -717Z 'SG C' Id�- R . 11,14 c� L) �4----C) J V SL— ` z /_ /9c CU141 t) -L a 44 - eQ &Y >070ky °jSD- CiL+4f-67 -71$ 5 4 0q, C Co (k y& tA a rt f cJ kuu vwL qtZ — iA -717Z 'SG C' Id�- R . 11,14 c� L) �4----C) J V SL— ` z /_ /9c CU141 t) -L a 44 - eQ &Y >070ky Citizens Petition We, as the signers below, are opposed to the conversion of the existing Dan Patch L Railroad Line for use as a high -speed commuter rail line connecting Northfield with downtown Minneapolis. Therefore we, so opposed to the above stated conversion, freely petition the City of Edina and Minnesota State Legislature to take an active roll in opposing the said conversion of the existing Dan Patch L Railroad Line for use as a high -speed commuter rail line. sponsord by the Alliance of Neighborhoods - Edina Chapter Date Name / Address Phone Number ILI 2 D4 t C f Os Y 60 0 9) 9a) - 3 1 36 VI 4 I I /� l <�z 1E AlS//i�_' l %1_,/� ��_)C 5 �� {' !� ► �1 I an SG I - (o ,. -I 6'11 C !ti v �i t (A �'.�� 0 Rn 8 1114 �'Wahjl s�a41 &2v,�441 & q5�- 9l;p- 12 13 1515 ►� 16 19 20 21 Z41Z(i Zi /i l /,ca�rn�J 6-51 (o COVOC 51 a l P_Lf 952- qZo -�sdti _70/ �`(-O.Z /I Citizens Petition We, as the signers below, are opposed to the conversion of the existing Dan Patch L _.ailroad Line for use as a high -speed commuter rail line connecting Northfield with downtown Minneapolis. Therefore we, so opposed to the above stated conversion, freely petition the City of Edina and Minnesota State Legislature to take an active roll in opposing the said conversion of the existing Dan Patch L Railroad Line for use as a high -speed commuter rail line. sponsord by the Alliance of Neighborhoods - Edina Chapter Date Name Address Phone Number 2 11 9M,- ' 14 15 16 17 18 20 21 —3 ZS S C Z.G -,-r7VZ W� - ?,'3�>' !�5/7 Citizens Petition We, as the signers below, are opposed to the conversion of the existing Dan Patch L Railroad Line for use as a high -speed commuter rail line connecting Northfield with downtown Minneapolis. Therefore we, so opposed to the above stated conversion, freely petition the City of Edina and Minnesota State Legislature to take an active roll in opposing the said conversion of the existing Dan Patch L Railroad Line for use as a high -speed commuter rail line. sponsord by the Alliance of Neighborhoods - Edina Chapter Date Name 1 /fto Address ` Phone Number �2i O IA S ' _ SV',1 k Z S 6c� brV, �.✓t,.- _I i) 14t 3 4 �b �i S I a'° f= D ,m_-A, c 7�/ V LN ►o cry 9�f I - Z % i(o 5 d g 516 0•., 6 1 8 9 ; "Va_ '�' W/- '_ 10 11 12 1 464119� 'Oe, Si .s L,,O_�� C/ 13 41 E�°�L'��� �f�D wive. y 14 1��5' Aw��S L_ ILIAD 5301f +T+- 414 ` "5� _ �4-f- 9S'V7 16 r e"r 17 18 101-'251C,6 191CVa U G r�'�/�AWMA • M 20 21 Citizens Petition We, as the signers below, are opposed to the conversion of the existing Dan Patch L Railroad Line for use as a high -speed commuter rail line- connecting Northfield with downtoa Minneapolis. Therefore we, so opposed to the above stated conversion, freely petition the City Edina and Minnesota State Legislature to take an active roll in opposing the said conversion of the existing Dan Patch L Railroad Line for use as a high -speed commuter rail line. sponsord by the Alliance of Neighborhoods - Edina Chapte natp Name Address Phone Number 1 � � 2 SZ /- O- 4 -17 - Qa .SG 02 �a 13- .�-ztti 6 /7 U J - �! fv /coo_ 7 65 G6� l wl tl a �33-C�51" 10 /a � •7 -F-9 E 11 Uy 1 %� ���d� -n CP 0� 42, Uv.3k 12/0 I �. �' ^.� f 02 rT 13 i i 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Citizens Petition We, as the signers below, are opposed to the conversion of the existing E an Patch L Railroad Line for use as a high -speed commuter rail line connecting Northfield with downtown Minneapolis. Therefore we, so opposed to the above stated conversion, freely petition the Citv of Edina and Minnesota State Legislature to take an active roll in opposing the said conversion of the .existing Dan Patch L Railroad. Line for use as a high -speed commuter rail line. sponsord by the Alliance of Neighborhoods - Edina Chapter Date Name ff Address Phone Number 2 4 ave-. %nJ 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 ?Z? _4 /I X36 -�- Citizens Petition We, as the signers below, are opposed to the conversion of the existing Dan Patch L Railroad Line for use as a high -speed commuter rail line connecting Northfield with downtown Minneapolis. Therefore we, so opposed to the above stated conversion, freely petition the City of Edina and Minnesota State Legislature to take an active roll in opposing the said conversion of the existing Dan Patch L Railroad Line for use as a high -speed commuter rail line. sponsord by the Alliance of Neighborhoods - Edina Chapter 8 Date Name Address Phone Number 9 1012 110o d �/ zz z k 2 3 _ tai 3 4 _ a 3 �• w �D 03 5 a / W, a -� 6 /0 22 od ,. L� (/a c«i' (��-�✓ � `ESL ?.�-/�3� 7 N A I e) 2 / ^n /�oG�.� -•� �7� 74 �1 r� i cicalP 952 cI �S - �1 y 33 8 9 10 ' 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Citizens Petition We, as the signers below, are opposed to the conversion of the existing Dan Patch L Railroad Line for use as a high -speed commuter rail line connecting Northfield with downtown Minneapolis. Therefore we, so opposed to the above stated conversion, freely petition the City of Edina and Minnesota State Legislature to take an active roll in opposing the said conversion of the existing, Dan Patch L Railroad Line for use as a high -speed commuter rail line. sponsord by the Alliance of Neighborhoods - Edina Chapter Date Name Address Phone Number 1 /OIA O %o 0 G VYLew a. .S -Zo � ► c ��J o v c! iz 9 -� � o t� 5Ik=--bi-el_ 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 -3 62s (A( —5-510 Citizens Petition We, as the signers below, are opposed to the conversion of the existing Dan Patch L Railroad Line for use as a high -speed commuter rail line connecting Northfield with downtown Minneapolis. Therefore we, so opposed to the above stated conversion, freely petition the City of Edina and Minnesota State Legislature to take an active roll in opposing the said conversion of the existing Dan Patch L Railroad Line for use as a high -speed commuter rail line. sponsord by the Alliance of Neighborhoods - Edina Chapter Date Name Address Phone Number ..'� _1�_ 00 4 2 LC Sso qJL P a 5 9 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Citizens Petition We, as the signers below, are opposed to the conversion of the existing Dan Patch L Railroad Line for use as a high -speed commuter rail line connecting Northfield with downtown Minneapolis. Therefore we, so opposed to the' above stated conversion, freely petition the City of Edina and Minnesota State Legislature to take an active roll in opposing the said conversion of the existing Dan Patch L Railroad Line for use as a high -speed commuter rail line. sponsord by the Alliance of Neighborhoods - Edina Chapter Date ame Address Phone Number 5213 W: 4 --< 9 z 7- 5-'1 2 J 7 5 Cenr kj— �Z Sy3a 6 /o%/e- ��"a � '?-7 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Citizens Petition We, as the signers below, are opposed to the conversion of the existing Dan Patch L Railroad Line for use as a high -speed commuter rail line connecting Northfield with downtown Minneapolis. Therefore we, so opposed to the above stated conversion, freely petition the City of Edina and Minnesota State Legislature to take an active roll in opposing the said conversion of the existing Dan Patch L Railroad Line for use as a high -speed commuter rail line. sponsord by the Alliance of Neighborhoods - Edina Chapter Date Name Address Phone Number 1 'r 3 '. /-� 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Ikk We, as the signers below, are opposed to the conversion of the existing Dan Patch L Railroad Line for use as a high -speed commuter rail line connecting Northfield with downtown Minneapolis.Therefore we, so opposed to the above stated conversion, freely petition the City of Edina and Minnesota State Legislature to take an active roll in opposing the said conversion of the existing Dan Patch L Railroad Line for use as a high -speed commuter rail line. sponsord by the Alliance of Neighborhoods - Edina Chapter Date Name Address Phone Number 2 3-Z- -3 C - b /. 3 4 S 6 7 A 9 10 11 - - -- - 12 13 14 15 16 17 - a Citizens Petition ;r Mot Citizens Petition We, as the signers below, are opposed to the conversion of the existing Dan Patch L Aailroad Line for use as a high -speed commuter rail line connecting Northfield with downtown Minneapolis. Therefore. we, so opposed to the above stated conversion, freely petition the City of Edina and Minnesota State Legislature to take an active roll in opposing the said conversion of the existing Dan Patch L Railroad Line for use as a high -speed commuter rail line. sponsord by the Alliance of Neighborhoods - Edina Chapter Date Name Address Phone Number 2 (Zc6t r 3u 5 50 33 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 9 20 21 Citizens Petition We, as the signers below, are opposed to the conversion of the existing Dan Patch L Railroad Line for use as a high -speed commuter rail line connecting Northfield with downtown Minneapolis. Therefore we, so opposed to the above stated conversion, freely petition the City of Edina and Minnesota State Legislature to take an active roll in opposing the said conversion of the existing,Dan Patch L Railroad Line for use as a high -speed commuter rail line. sponsord by the Alliance of Neighborhoods - Edina Chapter Date �'� Name,) Address Phone Number 3 om42 5 6. 7 8 N 10 11 .. 12, 13 14 15 16' 17 18 19 20 21 Citizens Petition We, as the signers below, are opposed to the conversion of the existing Dan Patch L Railroad Line for use as a high -speed commuter rail line connecting Northfield with downtown Minneapolis. Therefore we, so opposed to the above stated conversion, freely petition the City of Edina and Minnesota State Legislature to take an active roll in opposing the said conversion of the existing Dan Patch L Railroad Line for use as a high -speed commuter rail line. sponsord by the Alliance of Neighborhoods - Edina Chapter Date Name _ Address Phone Number 1 1046 laab 5-yl 6", 2 /, J • S1 U _6���� 4 5 6 /o/aa/ov .��otf �� s9�a, C �e ell C-2 9 7 p O� / �.ev�e� 50 ��at� nor �n -�4$S 8 - 62 e ad & 9 l d as (Sti 1 AM U- 10 t I V i IfAaa�" Ann rH-57 6 r, 6' 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 ,i Citizens Petition We, as the signers below, are opposed to the conversion of the existing Dan Patch L Railroad Line for use as a high -speed commuter rail line connecting Northfield with downtown. Minneapo Lis. Therefore we, so opposed to the above stated conversion, freely petition the City of Edina and Minnesota State Legislature to take an active roll in opposing the said conversion of the existing Dan Patch L Railroad Line for use as a high -speed commuter rail line. sponsord by the Alliance of Neighborhoods - Edina Chapter Date Name Address Phone Number 2 q; 2 I-66 f ual Cdl olia I (t. CV I ! a) 3 9'a4/ - 9 --7,-) 6 �/� /Orb - / NaWJJO -71 �r�- 99 7-&31 Sr 7 q1Y p 2 9 Ik? 44C4711 MA44ey 10 -[/.1. 6--D „ k 0 12��a/��'O 1 1 15 `j,li Uv 16 ql-'�Iltlo 17 q12-110C 18 1 �zi vv 20 'OCII 21 eodo iRe Rj'� rJ Jaj 4_ 4ev,G W 3 icA S.), 13 (�J'hG�Se�Irt S 9� - S 7 5F I jn r & JGj 6 �0 s- = �rt�1. tit I IRZ A A 1 'P�' S?/ (0 1 F 10 ti (Y 0V 21 gZ�►'�4C+ rn-t _ K ► g 5 I C� I . -fir- `� l -7 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDirvA Council Check Register 6/7/01 -6/7101 Check # Date Amount Vendor Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Account Description 222161 6/7/01 104673 ACE HARDWARE & PAINT 51.26 REPAIRS TO TRIMMERS 19799 0027792409 5630.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 6/7101 8:11:20 Page - 1 Business Unit CENTENNIAL LAKES 19669 88624 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 19918 00051300 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 19613 38378 5311.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POOL OPERATION 19800 -- -- 51.26 PRINTING 222162 6/7/01 16840 100616 ACTION MAILING SERVICES INC. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 382.54 MAIL PROCESS 5918.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 382.54 222163 6/7/01 102609 ALL SAINTS BRANDS 458.10 458.10 222164 617/01 100575 ALL -SAFE DIV. OF ALL FIRE TEST 46.88 FIRE EXTINGUISHER SERVICE 46.88 222165 6!7/01 102715 ALLEGRA PRINT & IMAGING 546.35 CAFR TABS 546.35 222166 6/7/01 102586 AMERICAN PAYMENT CENTERS 75.00 BOX SERVICE 75.00 222167 6/7/01 103957 AMERICAN VAN EQUIPMENT INC. _589.25 - TOOL BOX, RACK 589.25 222168 6/7/01 104105 ANALYTICAL PRODUCTS GROUP INC. 165.00 QUALITY CONTROL SAMPLES 165.00 222169 617/01 100630 ANCHOR PAPER CO. INC.. 49.71 BROCHURE, INVITATION PAPER 49.71 222170 617/01 101611 ANOKA - HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLE 100.00 TRAINING -. 250.00 REFRESHER TRAINING 200.00 FFII CERTIFICATION TRAINING 550.00 6/7101 8:11:20 Page - 1 Business Unit CENTENNIAL LAKES 19669 88624 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 19918 00051300 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 19613 38378 5311.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POOL OPERATION 19800 37905 1550.6575 PRINTING CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 19670 16840 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 19724 00677215 5918.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VEHICLE OPERATION 19725 84066 1491.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LABORATORY 19802 S30482101 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 19614 00013531 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 19615 00013508 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 19803 00013225 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Vendor Explanation 222171 6/7/01 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS Page - 2 617/01 —617/01 102.08 WATER FILTRATION PO # Doc No 102.08 Account No Account Description 222172 617/01 19671 104686 ARMSTRONG, MARK 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES — 171.00 —_ 053101 TRAINING COURSE FEES CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 171.00 6413 1400.6406 222173 6/7/01 19726 103933 ASF ASSOCIATES LTD. 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 60.00 837853 KEYBOARD VISION AIDS COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 60.00 052501 4606.6710 222174 617101 19728 102134 ASHWORTH INC. 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 153.82 052001 MERCHANDISE TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS CENTENNIAL LAKES 271.88 374 MERCHANDISE GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 425.70 21173 -1 5913.6406 222175 617/01 19617 102472 AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 831.34 ACCT 10125789 831.34 222176 617/01 101954 AUGIE'S INC. 69.52 FOOD 69.52 222177 6/7/01 100638 BACHMAN'S — 345.89 -- ANNUALS 345.89 222178 617/01 104069 BAD BOY WATSON GRAPHIC DESIGN 6_75.21 — BUSINESS CARDS 675.21 222179 617/01 104646 BARGEN INC. 1,085.00 CUT -OUT REPAIRS 1,085.00 222180 617101 102195 BATTERIES PLUS 57.49 CORD REPLACEMENT 57.49 CITY OF EDINA 617101 8:11:20 Council Check Register Page - 2 617/01 —617/01 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Account Description Business Unit 19671 6013 - 187080 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 19801 053101 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 19804 6413 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 19726 824212 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 19727 837853 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 19805 052501 4606.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COPS MORE GRANT 19728 11740 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 19806 052001 5630.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS CENTENNIAL LAKES 19807 374 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 19616 21173 -1 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 19617 F5 -75625 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Vendor Explanation 222181 6/7101 102449 BATTERY WHOLESALE INC. 83.38 GOLF CAR BATTERIES 154.07 BATTERIES 222182 6/7/01 104660 BC SOFTWARE 250.00 WEB SITE MAINTENANCE 250.00 222183 6/7/01 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 683.75 683.75 222184 6!7101 103712 BERNADAS WINES SELECTION INC. CITY OF EUiNA Council Check Register 6/7/01 -617/01 PO # Doc No Inv No 19618 12214 19672 12243 222185 6/7/01 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 28.72 OFFICE SUPPLIES 10.02 OFFICE SUPPLIES 84.10 OFFICE SUPPLIES 47.39 OFFICE SUPPLIES 37.94 ORGANIZER, DUST COVERS 34.94 PENS 17.99- RETURN 16.76- RETURN 75.04 SHELF LABELS, PENS 283.40 8805150 222186 6/7/01 104661 BIG RIVER CONSULTING GROUP LLC 1.685.00 TEAM PLANNING SESSION 222187 6/7101 100653 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS 550.59 ASPHALT 3,402.50 ASPHALT 225.24 ASPHALT 4,045.13 ASPHALT 8,223.46 Account No Account Description 5210.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 617/01 8:11:20 Page - 3 Business Unit GOLF CARS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 19619 052501 5210.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 19919 21414200 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 19920 443 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 19620 8794351 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 19621 8802390 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 19621 8802390 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 19621 8802390 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 19729 8798280 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 19808 8805150 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 19809 CM8780900 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 19810 CM7346870 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 19811 8814100 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 19622 051801 19623 81547 19623 81547 19624 81587 19624 81587 INSPECTIONS ENGINEERING GENERAL PARK ADMIN. GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 1190.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING 1301.6518 BLACKTOP 1314.6518 BLACKTOP 1301.6518 BLACKTOP 1314.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE STREET RENOVATION GENERAL MAINTENANCE STREET RENOVATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 617/01 -617/01 Check # Date Amount Vendor Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No 222188 6/7101 102392 BLACK, STEVE 132.00 SOFTBALL UMPIRE 19812 060201 6/7/01 8:11:20 Page - 4 Account No Account Description Business Unit 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 100.00 132.00 222189 6/7101 100711 BLOOD, DAVID 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 19659 060701 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 222190 6/7/01 103879 BLOOMINGTON RENTAL CENTER 59.85 PROPANE TANK RECERTIFICATION 19813 052201 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 59.85 222191 617/01 100663 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE 59.85 19917 060101 5210.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF DOME PROGRAM 189.00 19917 060101 5401.4603 COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS GOLF REVENUES 70.00 19917 060101 5410.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS GOLF ADMINISTRATION 45.00 19917 060101 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION 33.52 19917 060101 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 20.13 19917 060101 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 44.12 19917 060101 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 129.68 19917 060101 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 42.56 19917 060101 5430.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 38.14 19917 060101 5431.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 24.96 19917 060101 5440.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 45.52 - -- 19917 060101 5440.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 742.48 222192 617/01 102220 BROWDER STONE COMPANY 901.75 T- SHIRTS 19730 21215 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOT 102.51 TOTE BAGS 19731 21214 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOI 1,004.26 222193 6/7/01 103259 BUREAU OF ALCOHOL TOBACCO & FI 83.33 SPECIAL TAX BATF 19625 TAX 5820.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS 50TH STREET GENERAL 83.33 SPECIAL TAX BATF 19625 TAX 5840.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 83.34 SPECIAL TAX BATF 19625 TAX 5860.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 250.00 222194 6/7/01 100776 BUTLER, GEORGE 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 19657 060701 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 . CITY OF EuiNA 6/7/01 8:11:20 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 5 6/7/01 -617/01 Check # Date Amount Vendor Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Account Description Business Unit 222195 6/7/01 102663 C.S. MCCROSSAN CONSTRUCTION IN 2,919.18 FINAL PAYMENT 19673 060501 10080.1705.30OONTRACTOR PAYMENTS N080 - SIDEWALK VERNON - BLAK 2,919.18 222196 6/7/01 104684 CARLSON, DIANE 21.00 - - -- GHIN REFUND 19814 060101 5401.4603 COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS GOLF REVENUES 21.00 222197 6/7/01 100453 CASUAL CONTRACT 631.90 - PATIO TABLE TOPS 19732 7590 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 631.90 222198 6/7/01 100681 CATCO 100.10 COUPLERS 19626 81 -33672 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 159.02 COUPLERS 19627 7 -32723 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 53.01 COUPLERS 19628 10-47769 1553.6530. REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 312.13 222199 617/01 101264 CHETS SHOES INC. 157.25 SHOES 19815 9501 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 157.25 222200 617/01 102691 CHRISTOFFER, KELLI 100.29 GLASS SUPPLIES 19818 060101 1629.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 100.29 222201 6/7/01 100688 CITY WIDE WINDOW SERVICE INC 15.71 - WINDOW CLEANING 19816 180865 5821.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 25.56 WINDOW CLEANING 19816 180865 5841.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS YORK OCCUPANCY 15.71 WINDOW CLEANING 19816 180865 5861.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS VERNON OCCUPANCY -- 56.98 222202 6/7101 104663 CLARK, KERRY 120.00 SWIMMING LESSON REFUND 19733 053001 1001.4390 REGISTRATION FEES GENERAL FUND REVENUES 120.00 222203 6/7/01 101994 CMC RESCUE INC. / 364.60 - RESCUE SUPPLIES 19817 0000044146 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 364.60 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 19821 066637 427.75 UNIFORM 19822 064076 Council Check Register 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 222210 6/7/01 101390 DANKO EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT CO. VERNON SELLING 6/7/01 -6/7/01 492.03 FOAM 19823 Check # Date Amount Vendor Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Account Description 222204 6/7/01 52.48 101323 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS 19737 653087 52.48 157.26 GLOVES, EARPLUGS, FIRST AID 19674 01539259 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 583.20 157.26 136659 1,857.80 19921 222205 617/01 100695 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO. 136807 49.50 19923 136810 577.98 STONEWARE, PORCELAIN 19734 043771 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 70.90 CLAY 19734 043771 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES 648.88 222206 6/7/01 100698 COPY EQUIPMENT INC. 6/7/01 8:11:20 Page - 6 Business Unit GENERAL MAINTENANCE ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOI ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 64.76 BLUEPRINT SUPPLIES 19735 0201003 1260.6548 BLUE PRINTING ENGINEERING GENERAL 64.76 222207 6/7/01 104657 COSTUME SPECIALISTS 120.00 MADELINE COSTUME 19820 060101 1627.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 120.00 222208 6/7/01 100702 CUSTOM CAMERA 91.40 CAMERA REPAIRS 19736 213827 5125.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 91.40 222209 617/01 102021 CYS UNIFORMS 78.20 UNIFORM 19821 066637 427.75 UNIFORM 19822 064076 505.95 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 222210 6/7/01 101390 DANKO EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT CO. VERNON SELLING 492.03 FOAM 19823 346172 492.03 222211 617/01 102121 DATREK PROFESSIONAL BAGS INC 52.48 BAG 19737 653087 52.48 222212 617/01 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING 583.20 19684 136659 1,857.80 19921 136809 35.00 19922 136807 49.50 19923 136810 2,798.75 19924 136808 5,324.25 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS 1470.6557 FIREFIGHTING FOAM MEDIA STUDIO FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER _YORK SELLING 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EuiNA 6/710. 8:11:20 Council Check Register Page - 7 617/01 - 617101 Check # Date Amount Vendor Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Account Description Business Unit 222213 6/7/01 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 48.22 BAKERY 19738 101372 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 23.63 BAKERY 19739 101168 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 43.42 BAKERY 19740 101078 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 90.72 BAKERY 19741 101077 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 58.49 BAKERY - - 19824 101430 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 264.48 222214 617/01 102712 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION 19846 DV0103109 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING 8 HOCKEY 19846 DV0103109 2210.6188 TELEPHONE COMMUNICATIONS 19846 DV0103109 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 19846 DV0103109 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 19846 DV0103109 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 19846 DV0103109 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 19846 DV0103109 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 19846 DV0103109 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 19846 DV0103109 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 19846 DV0103109 1628.6188 TELEPHONE SENIOR CITIZENS 19846 DV0103109 5311.6188 TELEPHONE POOL OPERATION 19846 DV0103109 1481.6188 TELEPHONE YORK FIRE STATION 19846 DV0103109 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 19846 DV0103109 5111.6188 TELEPHONE ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 19846 DV0103109 5610.6188 TELEPHONE ED ADMINISTRATION 19846 DV0103109 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 19846 DV0103109 5210.6188 TELEPHONE GOLF DOME PROGRAM 37.00 19846 DV0103109 1400.6204 TELETYPE SERVICE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 19847 DV0104109 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING 8 HOCKEY 19847 DV0104109 2210.6188 TELEPHONE COMMUNICATIONS 19847 DV0104109 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 19847 DV0104109 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 19847 DV0104109 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 19847 DV0104109 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 19847 DV0104109 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 19847 DV0104109 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 19847 DV0104109 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 19847 DV0104109 1628.6188 TELEPHONE SENIOR CITIZENS 19847 DV0104109 5311.6188 TELEPHONE POOL OPERATION 19847 DV0104109 1481.6188 TELEPHONE YORK FIRE STATION 19847 DV0104109 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Vendor Explanation CITY OF EDINA 37.00 6/7/01 8:11:20 Council Check Register 74.00 Page - 8 6/7/01 - 6/7101 222215 6!7101 102812 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY Account Description Business Unit 50.00 DV0104109 5111.6188 EXEMPTION INVOICE ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 19847 50.00 5610.6188 TELEPHONE ED ADMINISTRATION 222216 6 /7/01 5511.6188 101473 DEXTER SHOE COMPANY 19847 DV0104109 5210.6188 609.24 GOLF DOME PROGRAM 19847 SHOES 1400.6204 TELETYPE SERVICE 609.24 19742 253677 5510.6105 222217 617/01 19743 104343 DUNLOP SLAZENGER GROUP AMERICA COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 198.57 2375765 5421.6406 STAFF SHIRTS GRILL 19629 198.57 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF CARS 222218 6/7/01 5862.5513 100736 E -Z-GO TEXTRON 19925 384629 5842.5513 575.10 YORK SELLING 19926 GOLF CAR BATTERIES 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 575.10 19927 384065 5842.5513 222219 6/7/01 19825 100739 EAGLE WINE REPAIR PARTS PATHS & HARD SURFACE 19745 813.26 5430.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 19746 794475 858.42 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 19928 796097 5862.5514 100.30 VERNON SELLING 19929 792738 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 253.32 19930 793893 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,025.30 796103 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 222220 617/01 100740 EARL F. ANDERSEN INC. 16.70 LAG SCREWS 16.70 222221 6 17/01 100741 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 63.00 146.00 1,026.00 3,190.35 230.50 1,026.00 CITY OF EDINA 6/7/01 8:11:20 Council Check Register Page - 8 6/7/01 - 6/7101 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Account Description Business Unit 19847 DV0104109 5111.6188 TELEPHONE ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 19847 DV0104109 5610.6188 TELEPHONE ED ADMINISTRATION 19847 DV0104109 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 19847 DV0104109 5210.6188 TELEPHONE GOLF DOME PROGRAM 19847 DV0104109 1400.6204 TELETYPE SERVICE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 19742 253677 5510.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ARENA ADMINISTRATION 19743 211779 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 19744 2375765 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 19629 0760711 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF CARS 19685 384056 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 19925 384629 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 19926 384064 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 19927 384065 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 19825 0040438 -IN 1647.6530 REPAIR PARTS PATHS & HARD SURFACE 19745 790886 5430.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 19746 794475 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 19928 796097 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 19929 792738 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 19930 793893 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 19931 796103 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount GENERAL SUPPLIES Vendor Explanation Council Check Register 6578 1,880.25 CONTRACTED REPAIRS Page - 9 617/01 – 617101 6547 4,923.60 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PO # Doc No Inv No 6,966.30 Account Description Business Unit 19932 796121 1,026.00 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 19933 796123 28.50 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 19934 796391 20,506.50 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 222222 617/01 5842.5514 100746 ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIR 19936 796389 210.92 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX MOTORS 52.48 FURNACE CONTACTOR 263.40 222223 6/7/01 101444 ELECTRIC SERVICE CO. 495.00 ELECTRIC POLE SERVICE 495.00 222224 6/7/01 101956 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINTENANC 194.40 E -83 REPAIRS 3,345.82 — E-81 REPAIRS 3,540.22 222225 617101 104004 ESSIG, CRAIG 171.00 TRAINING COURSE FEES 171.00 222226 6/7/01 101476 EVERGREEN LAND SERVICES 713.50 EASEMENT ACQUISITION 713.50 222227 617101 104195 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC. 160.00 160.00 222228 6/7 /01 100044 FAIRVIEW SOUTHDALE HOSPITAL 181.6_9 OXYGENATOR, BIOGEL 181.69 222229 6/7/01 100216 FARMER BROTHERS COFFEE 8,25 - - -- -. - COCOA MIX 8.25 CITY OF EDINA 117468 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 6/7/01 8:11:20 Council Check Register 6578 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS Page - 9 617/01 – 617101 6547 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Account Description Business Unit 19932 796121 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 19933 796123 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 19934 796391 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 19935 796388 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 19936 796389 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 19675 282417 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 19826 281807 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 19747 117468 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 19827 6578 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 19828 6547 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 19829 053101 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 19630 00 -2290 01323.1705.2000NSULTING DESIGN BA -323 VALLEY VIEW & CROSSTO 19686 15216 19830 053101 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 19748 7843537 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD FIRE DEPT. GENERAL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/7/01 8:11:20 Council Check Register Page - 10 6/7/01 -617/01 Check # Date Amount Vendor Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Account Description Business Unit 222230 617/01 101475 FOOTJOY 163.79 SHOES 19749 4267456 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 163.79 222231 617/01 101712 GAGLIARDIE, CELESTE 100.00 JUNE 14 PERFORMANCE 19750 061401 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 100.00 222232 617101 103575 GANDRUD, ANN 139.38 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 19831 060101 5410.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GOLF ADMINISTRATION 139.38 222233 6/7101 104662 GILSON COMPANY INC. _ 36.72 TESTING SUPPLIES 19631 1045501 -01 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 36.72 222234 6/7101 104468 GLAS, JOHN 1,080.00 CLEANING 19751 052701 5420.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CLUB HOUSE 1,080.00 222235 617/01 101219 GLOBAL EQUIPMENT 267.92 DESK 19752 81094792 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDINGS 267.92 222236 617/01 103316 GOETSCH, SAM L. 240.00 SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETING 19832 060101 1629.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 240.00 222237 6/7101 101679 GOLFCRAFT 160.00 GOLF CLUBS 19753 14577 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 160.00 GOLF CLUBS 19754 14592 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 175.00 GOLF CLUBS 19755 14492 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 495.00 222238 6/7101 101103 GRAINGER 271.42 EAR PROTECTION 19833 498 - 905839 -3 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 46.81- RETURN 19834 498 - 444404-4 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 224.61 222239 6/7101 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 858.00 19937 39174 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF E.....A Council Check Register 617/01 -617/01 Check # Date Amount Vendor Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No - -- - 73397 - 19938 39171 617/0, 8:11:20 Page - 11 Account No Account Description Business Unit 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 19676 053001 5841.6188 TELEPHONE 19756 1041055315 -- 1,591.97 GENERAL SUPPLIES 19756 1041055315 222240 6/7101 19756 101518 GRAUSAM, STEVE GENERAL SUPPLIES 19835 1041054336 28.10 - - - REPAIR PARTS COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR CELL PHONE CHARGES 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 28.10 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 222241 6 /7/01 YORK SELLING 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. VERNON SELLING 44.94 TOOLS, ANCHOR KIT, LAMPS 7.76 TOOLS, ANCHOR KIT, LAMPS 57.90 TOOLS, ANCHOR KIT, LAMPS 93.61 EMERGENCY LIGHT 204.21 222242 6!7101 100782 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. 140.70 - 5.33- 911.71 126.05 8,096.23 4,287.40 2,068.03 126.80 1.40 2,066.39 17, 537.98 222243 6/7101 104665 HALLING, KARI 26.5_0 TENNIS LESSON REFUND 26.50 222244 6/7101 102320 HAMCO DATA PRODUCTS 146.86 PAPER 146.86 222245 617/01 103359 HANSON PIPE & PRODUCTS INC. 625.59 CONCRETE CONE, SLAB 625.59 222246 6/7/01 102301 HARTLAND FUEL PRODUCTS LLC 10,798.80 GAS 617/0, 8:11:20 Page - 11 Account No Account Description Business Unit 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 19676 053001 5841.6188 TELEPHONE 19756 1041055315 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 19756 1041055315 5820.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 19756 1041055315 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 19835 1041054336 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS 19687 559081 19688 562205 19939 384060 19940 384059 19941 384063 19942 384066 19943 384067 19944 384062 19945 384068 19946 384058 19757 053001 19915 213042 YORK OCCUPANCY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 50TH STREET GENERAL STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1001.4390 REGISTRATION FEES 5822.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 19758 477001327882 5932.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 19759 403937 1553.6581 GASOLINE GENERAL FUND REVENUES 50TH ST SELLING GENERAL STORM SEWER EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/7101 8:11:20 Council Check Register Page - 12 6/7/01 -617/01 Check # Date Amount Vendor Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Account Description Business Unit 10,798.80 222247 6/7/01 104678 HCMC TRAUMA SERVICES 20.00 CPS TRAINING 19836 060101 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 4,290.00 MECHANICAL MAINTENANCE 8,751.00 MECHANICAL MAINTENANCE 17,159.50 222254 6/7/01 100842 HOUSEHOLD BANK F.S.B. (KNOX) 18.96 PLIERS 30.53 PROPANE, LAG SCREWS, WOOD 222255 617/01 104683 HUNCHIS, WILLIAM 21.00 GHIN REFUND 21.00 19837 000016 1195.6225 BOARD & ROOM PRISONER LEGAL SERVICES 19838 00035612 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 19839 00034271 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 19667 060701 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 19840 568PS104 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 19841 1555HB353 5620.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENTEDINBOROUGH PARK 19841 1555HB353 5210.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENTGOLF DOME PROGRAM 19841 1555HB353 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 19842 0217 - 462346 - - 20.00 TOOLS FIELD MAINTENANCE 222248 6/7/01 1646.6406 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 19844 060101 2,372.18 - -- COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS ROOM & BOARD - APRIL 2001 2,372.18 222249 6/7101 101588 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE 3,100.00 LT. TESTING 3,100.00 222250 6/7/01 103838 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE 342.00 FIRE TRAINING FEES 342.00 222251 617/01 102843 HO, JEFFERY D. 2,000.00 MEDICAL DIRECTOR SERVICES 2,000.00 222252 6/7101 101365 HONEYWELL INC. 143.00 KEY CARD SYSTEM 143.00 222253 6/7/01 101774 HONEYWELL INC. 4,118.50 MECHANICAL MAINTENANCE 4,290.00 MECHANICAL MAINTENANCE 8,751.00 MECHANICAL MAINTENANCE 17,159.50 222254 6/7/01 100842 HOUSEHOLD BANK F.S.B. (KNOX) 18.96 PLIERS 30.53 PROPANE, LAG SCREWS, WOOD 222255 617/01 104683 HUNCHIS, WILLIAM 21.00 GHIN REFUND 21.00 19837 000016 1195.6225 BOARD & ROOM PRISONER LEGAL SERVICES 19838 00035612 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 19839 00034271 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 19667 060701 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 19840 568PS104 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 19841 1555HB353 5620.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENTEDINBOROUGH PARK 19841 1555HB353 5210.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENTGOLF DOME PROGRAM 19841 1555HB353 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 19842 0217 - 462346 1642.6556 TOOLS FIELD MAINTENANCE 19843 0217 - 462428 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 19844 060101 5401.4603 COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS GOLF REVENUES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/7/01 8:11:20 Council Check Register Page - 13 6/7101 —6/7101 Check # Date Amount Vendor Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Account Description Business Unit 222256 6/7/01 100811 HYDRO SUPPLY CO 6 17/01 ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 101455 I.U.O.E. LOCAL 49 TRAINING PRO 222262 6/7/01 1,122.72 BARE METER 19760 0018896 -IN 5900.1357 INVENTORY WATER METER UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 378.08 FLANGE GASKET, CONNECTION 19761 0018895 -IN 5900.1357 INVENTORY WATER METER UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 1,801.98 FLANGE GASKET, METER 19762 0018897 -IN 5900.1357 INVENTORY WATER METER UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 1,757.25 BARE METER HEX KEYS, GASKETS 19763 0018898 -IN 5900.1357 INVENTORY WATER METER UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 222261 6/7/01 5,060.03 101403 J -CRAFT INC. POOL ADMINISTRATION 19766 105,256.61 222257 6 17/01 ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 101455 I.U.O.E. LOCAL 49 TRAINING PRO 222262 6/7/01 101400 JAMES, WILLIAM F 2,700.00 PUBLIC WORKS TRAINING 19632 052101 100.00 2,700.00 222263 6/7/01 102157 JEFF ELLIS & ASSOCIATES INC. 222258 6 17/01 144.00 102223 IMPERIAL HEADWEAR INC 144.00 222264 419.85 HATS 19764 486283 149.10 ART FAIR FLYERS 419.85 149.10 222265 222259 6 /7/01 102136 JERRY S TRANSMISSION SERVICE 100066 IMS/MINNESOTA 180.00 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 180.72 POSTAGE MACHINE RATE CHANGE 19633 052901 180.72 222260 6/7/01 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. 45.78 PVC & CEMENT, PRIMER 19845 243889 222261 6/7/01 5310.6104 101403 J -CRAFT INC. POOL ADMINISTRATION 19766 105,256.61 DUMP TRUCK BODIES PRINTING ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 105,256.61 222262 6/7/01 101400 JAMES, WILLIAM F 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 100.00 222263 6/7/01 102157 JEFF ELLIS & ASSOCIATES INC. 144.00 TRAINING VIDEO 144.00 222264 6 /7/01 100830 JERRY S PRINTING 149.10 ART FAIR FLYERS 149.10 222265 6 /7/01 102136 JERRY S TRANSMISSION SERVICE 180.00 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE 19765 27337 1305.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 19664 060701 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 19677 20004863 5310.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POOL ADMINISTRATION 19766 A -18517 5110.6575 PRINTING ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 19848 17786 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount - -- -- 180.00 222266 6/7101 100833 JOHN HENRY FOSTER MINNESOTA IN 6.03 O -RING 6.03 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 617101 -617/01 Vendor Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Account Description 19634 1155749 -01 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 617/01 8:11:20 Page - 14 Business Unit GENERAL MAINTENANCE 222268 6!7101 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 3.34- 19689 159622 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 40.26- 19690 159754 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 24.70- 19691 159302 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 14.94- 19692 159150 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,171.19 19947 1261215 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3,223.28 19948 1261214 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 47.60 19949 1261216 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,821.22 19950 1261213 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,237.47 19951 1261209 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,840.24 19952 1261210 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 55.48 19953 1261211 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,146.89 19954 1261208 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 91.75 19955 1261207 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 288.70 19956 1261212 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 740.60 19957 1261576 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 84.00 19958 1261579 5822.5513 COST-OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 387.23 19959 1261578 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 605.31 19960 1261577 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 3.75 19961 1259572 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 11,183.13 19962 1259571 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 369.39 19963 1256992 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 10,254.94 19964 1256144 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 8,256.17- 19965 159621 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 29,212.76 222269 6/7101 101072 JOHNSON, WALTER 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 19666 060701 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 222270 617101 102394 KIFFMEYER, WALLY 219.00 SOFTBALL UMPIRE 19849 060201 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 219.00 222271 6/7/01 102101 KINKO'S R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Vendor Explanation 421.74 PRINTING 421.74 222272 617/01 100944 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC. 63.00 37.00 412.00 1,009.00 74.00 1,404.00 2,999.00 222273 6/7/01 100846 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO 50.00 2,091.35 CITY OF EDINA 6/7/01 104676 KUSSMAUL ELECTRONICS CO. INC. 6/7/01 8:11:20 Council Check Register Page - 15 617/01 - 617101 45.64 AMBULANCE COVERS 19851 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Account Description Business Unit 19850 062200037256 5610.6575 PRINTING ED ADMINISTRATION 19966 151944 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 19967 151791 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 19968 151943 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 19969 151942 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 19970 151789 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 19971 151945 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 19693 298828 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 19972 298758 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 19973 299170 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 19974 299171 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 222274 6/7/01 104676 KUSSMAUL ELECTRONICS CO. INC. 45.64 AMBULANCE COVERS 19851 86350 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 45.64 222275 617/01 104670 LAWYER NURSERY INC. 216.43 `REES 19852 10072204 1644.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES TREES & MAINTENANCE 216.43 222276 6/7/01 104674 LENKER MANUFACTURING CO. INC. -- 357.77 -- SURVEYING SUPPLIES 19853 36721 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 357.77 222277 6 /7/01 102028 LUCKTENBERG, PAUL _ 308.00 SOFTBALL UMPIRE 19854 060201 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 308.00 222278 617/01 100864 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. 17.75 BUSHINGS 19635 2014387 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 17.75 222279 617101 104680 MADER, KAREN 65.00 SWIMMING LESSON REFUND 19855 060101 1001.4390 REGISTRATION FEES GENERAL FUND REVENUES R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount 5822.5515 Vendor Explanation 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 65.00 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 222280 617/01 YORK SELLING 100868 MARK VII SALES YORK SELLING 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 870.70 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 78.50 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 2,713.30 5430.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 15.20 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 184.00 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 23.25 19858 738818 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 71.15 21.80 1,298.21 1,764.05 32.55 99.40 43.05 2,596.66 39.80 1,639.15 3,082.37 14,573.14 222281 6/7/01 101030 MATHISON CO. 49.92 PAPER WC COTMAN 49.92 222282 617101 102600 MATRIX COMMUNICATIONS INC 155.00 SERVICE CALL 155.00 222283 6/7/01 101254 MCCORMICK, CAROL CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 617/01 -617/01 PO # Doc No Inv No 19694 283060 19695 283063 19696 283082 19697 283081 19698 283084 19699 283083 19700 282405 19701 282406 19702 282404 19703 282538 19704 282539 19767 282870 19975 260738. 19976 284819 19977 282541 19978 283059 19979 282540 Account No Account Description 6/7/01 8:11:20 Page - 16 Business Unit 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5430.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 19768 452146 -0 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOI 19856 0047584 -IN 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1_00.0_0 JUNE 12 PERFORMANCE 19769 061201 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 100.00 222284 6/7/01 100515 MCM ELECTRONICS 62.50 SUPPLIES 19770 979402 5125.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES MEDIA STUDIO 62.50 222285 6/7/01 100870 MDS MATRX 66.29 DISCIDE TOWELETTE 19857 740307 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 395.48 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 19858 738818 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Vendor Explanation 461.77 222286 617101 100881 MERFELD, BURT 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 100.00 222287 6/7/01 100882 MERIT SUPPLY CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 617/01 - 6/7101 PO # Doc No Inv No 222292 617101 103635 MINNEAPOLIS MEDICAL RESEARCH F 1,200.00 SKILLS LAB 1,200.00 19658 060701 Account No Account Description 6/7/01 8:11:20 Page - 17 Business Unit 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 19636 56618 762.54 CLEANING SUPPLIES 19678 CLEANING SUPPLIES 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 352.73 56616 1552.6511 WATER JUGS 19722 56396. 184.17 CLEANING SUPPLIES 19723 DEGREASER 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 513.43 51629 1642.6544 RED PADS, CLEANING SUPPLIES 19860 51670 241.76 TOOLS 19861 WYPALLS, POLYLINERS 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 2,054.63 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 222288 6/7/01 101891 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY 272.21 MARKING PAINT, TOOLS 117.04 RAKES 45.74 FIELD MARKING PAINT 434.99 222289 617/01 103519 MICHAELIS, ELIZABETH 21.00 GHIN REFUND 21.00 222290 6/7/01 100891 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. 11,483.14 ASPHALT _ 150.00 TACK PURCHASE 11.633.14 222291 6/7/01 100692 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLING COM 325.08 29.00 28.50 ,Ana of 222292 617101 103635 MINNEAPOLIS MEDICAL RESEARCH F 1,200.00 SKILLS LAB 1,200.00 19658 060701 Account No Account Description 6/7/01 8:11:20 Page - 17 Business Unit 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 19636 56618 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 19678 56629 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 19679 56616 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 19722 56396. 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 19723 56414. 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 19859 51629 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER 19860 51670 1642.6556 TOOLS 19861 51654 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS GENERAL MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING STREET NAME SIGNS FIELD MAINTENANCE FIELD MAINTENANCE FIELD MAINTENANCE 19862 060101 5401.4603 COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS GOLF REVENUES 19637 68946MB 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 19771 46002 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 19705 65533070 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 19772 67004175 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 19863 67005131 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 19864 67005149 _ 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 19980 60983055 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 19865 052501 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENTEDINBOROUGH PARK Vendor Explanation 222293 6/7/01 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION 100522 MINNESOTAAIR 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION 926.55 REPAIR PARTS HEAT PUMP 19868 68932 -00 926.55 REPAIR PARTS GENERAL TURF CARE 222294 6/7/01 101284 MINNESOTA CROWN DIST CO 108.50 - -- -108.50 222295 6/7/01 101638 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 18,111.00 CONNECTION FEE 18,111.00 222296 6/7/01 100903 MINNESOTA ELEVATOR INC 78.50 MAY SERVICE 78.50 222297 617/01 101376 MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPMENT 1,233.11 CURB BOX RISERS, LIDS 464.52 CURB BOX REPAIR, LIDS 1,697.63 222298 6/7101 104668 MIRMAN, HANNAH 60.00 CLASS REFUND 60.00 222299 6/7101 102395 MDSE, WILLIAM _ _._.. 308.00 SOFTBALL UMPIRE 308.00 222300 6/7/01 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 204.70 REPAIR PARTS 33.78 SPRINKLER PARTS 238.48 222301 6/7/01 100240 MULLIGAN GOLF - TEE'S R US 244.94 MAT TEES 244.94 222302 6/7/01 104671 MUSCO SPORTS LIGHTING LLC 320.43 BALLAST 320.43 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/7/01 — 6/7101 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Account Description 19773 3424208 5424.6530 REPAIR PARTS 6/7/01 8:11:20 Page - 18 Business Unit RANGE 19706 8718 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 19680 050701 5915.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER WATER TREATMENT 19866 32865 5620.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENTEDINBOROUGH PARK 19774 0099882 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION 19775 0099594 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION 19776 052901 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 19867 060201 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 19638 68941 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 19868 68932 -00 1643.6530 REPAIR PARTS GENERAL TURF CARE 19777 3049 5424.6590 RANGE BALLS 19869 77906 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS RANGE BUILDING MAINTENANCE CITY OF EDINA 617/01 8:11:20 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 19 617101 -617/01 Check # Date Amount Vendor Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Account Description Business Unit 222303 617101 104667 NELSON, LISA 60.00 SWIMMING LESSON REFUND 19778 053101 1001.4390 REGISTRATION FEES GENERAL FUND REVENUES 60.00 222304 617/01 104659 NEPTUNE BENSON INC. 136.35 STRAINER 19639 4568 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 136.35 222305 6/7101 104672 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS _ 1,7_59.46 INVESTIGATIONS 19870 051901 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,759.46 222306 6/7/01 100724 NISSEN, DICK 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 19663 060701 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 222307 6/7101 100929 NORTH STAR ICE 20.38 19981 78115009 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 61.76 19982 06115017 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 82.14 222308 617101 100925 NORTH STAR TURF 199.37 REPAIR PARTS 19640 252173 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,521.46 REPAIR PARTS 19779 252624 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,720.83 222309 617101 100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY 8.50 PENCILS 19780 19192700 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOI 94.85 PENCILS, ERASERS, WATERCOLORS 19781 19180200 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOI 103.35 222310 617/01 102850 OFFICE DEPOT 344.96 ACCT 6011565610019768 19871 052601 5440.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 266.85 ACCT 6011565610019768 19871 052601 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 96.18 ACCT 6011565610019768 19871 052601 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 707.99 222311 6/7/01 104687 OIKOS TREE CROPS 2_03.55 TREES 19872 10167 1644.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES TREES & MAINTENANCE 203.55 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/7/01 8:11:20 Council Check Register Page - 20 617/01 - 6!7101 Check # Date Amount PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Vendor Explanation /04 222312 617/01 5842.5513 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 256.35 104 YORK SELLING REPAIR PARTS COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 19642 256.35 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 222313 6/7/01 100941 PARK NICOLLET CLINIC 19642 9992000066 -5 1550.6121 200.00 CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL HEPATITIS SHOTS 100.00 19642 9992000066 -5 HEPATITIS SHOTS ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 50.00 /04 HEPATITIS SHOTS 196.00 DRUG TESTING 133.75 NEW EMPLOYEE PHYSICAL 679.75 222314 617/01 103912 PARK SUPPLY INC. 91.27 PLUMBING PARTS 91.27 222315 6/7/01 100948 PERKINS LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS 1,450.00 LANDSCAPING 1,450.00 222316 6/7/01 100949 PERSONNEL DECISIONS 2,050.00 TESTING 2,050.00 TESTING 2,050.00 TESTING 6,150.00 222317 6/7/01 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 158.00- 491.20 2,029.48 664.20 1,031.04 470.15 794.61 625.45 PO # Doc No Inv No 19641 93578 Account No Account Description 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS Business Unit MAINT OF COURSE 8 GROUNDS 19642 9992000066 -5 1553.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN VERNON SELLING /04 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5842.5513 19642 9992000066 -5 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 5842.5512 104 YORK SELLING 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 19642 9992000066 -5 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL /04 19642 9992000066 -5 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL /04 19642 9992000066 -5 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL /04 19873 27780400 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 19782 052101 5422.6251 SHARED MAINTENANCE MAINT OF COURSE 8 GROUNDS 19643 J168119 19644 J168118 19874 J170113 19707 3239931 19983 725224 19984 725223 19985 725221 19986 725220 19987 725219 19988 725222 19989 725488 5910.6106 MEETING EXPENSE GENERAL (BILLING) 5910.6106 MEETING EXPENSE GENERAL (BILLING) 5910.6106 MEETING EXPENSE GENERAL (BILLING) 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Vendor Explanation 35.00 149.95 6,133.08 222318 67/01 102156 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING 167.13 694.36 40.70 978.43 30.10 18.97 TWIST TIE BOWS _ 1,929.69 222319 6/7101 102748 PIRTEK PLYMOUTH CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 67/01 -6/7/01 PO # Doc No Inv No 19990 725489 19991 725487 226.62 HOSE, FERRULES, FITTINGS -- - 226.62 222320 6/7/01 100819 POPP COMMUNICATIONS 755.60 PHONE INSTALLATION 67/01 8:11:20 Page - 21 Account No Account Description Business Unit 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 19992 43286 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 19993 43183 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 19994 43278 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 19995 43279 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 19996 43276 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 19997 43277 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 19783 PL11985 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 19875 42030 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 222321 67/01 102856 PORTHAN, TODD 142.80 WORK BOOT REIMBURSEMENT 19876 053101 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS 142.80 222322 67101 100964 PRECISION TURF & CHEMICAL 636.44 CHEMICALS 19645 17384 5422.6545 CHEMICALS 222323 67/01 100968 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,260.08 19708 384627 214.90 19709 384057 9.11. 19710 562204 13.255- 19711 562203 172.40 19998 384061 1,554.79 19999 384628 _ 1,020.07 20000 384630 4,199.88 222324 6/7101 104669 PURE BLUE SWIM SHOP 798.90 UNIFORMS 19877 10506 FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5311.6201 LAUNDRY POOL OPERATION R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount 798.90 222325 6/7101 100970 QUALITY REFRIGERATION INC 225.00 SERVICE CONTRACT Vendor Explanation CITY OF EDINA 6/7/01 8:11:20 Council Check Register Page - 22 617/01 -6/7/01 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Account Description Business Unit 19784 307360 5421.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GRILL 225.00 222326 6/7/01 100971 QUALITY WINE 439.57 19712 967437 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 8.72- 19712 967437 -00 5820.4408 TRADE DISCOUNTS 50TH STREET GENERAL 1,278.86 19713 967348 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 12.66- 19713 967348-00 5820.4408 TRADE DISCOUNTS 50TH STREET GENERAL 37.33 19714 967438 -00 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING .36- 19714 967438 -00 5820.4408 TRADE DISCOUNTS 50TH STREET GENERAL 1,759.76 19716 967347 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 17.39- 19716 967347 -00 5860.4408 TRADE DISCOUNTS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 2,334.13 20001 967443 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 45.47- 20001 967443 -00 5840.4408 TRADE DISCOUNTS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 1,028.90 20002 967701 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 10.16- 20002 967701 -00 5840.4408 TRADE DISCOUNTS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 2,733.30 20003 967712 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 54.22- 20003 967712 -00 5860.4408 TRADE DISCOUNTS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 9,462.87 222327 617101 103512 QUIST, SUSAN 13.00 19878 060101 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 119.92 19878 060101 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 128.87 19878 060101 1400.6106 MEETING EXPENSE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 68.55 19878 060101 1400.6405 BOOKS & PAMPHLETS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 165.92 19878 060101 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 55.74 19878 060101 1400.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 30.35 19878 060101 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 30.69 19878 060101 1400.6553 PRISONER MEALS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL _6.92 - -- 19878 060101 1425.6106 MEETING EXPENSE DARE 619.96 222328 617/01 103478 QWEST 55.28 19785 052501 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 85.51 19785 052501 1481.6188 TELEPHONE YORK FIRE STATION 5,094.90 19785 052501 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 172.07 19785 052501 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 274.29 19785 052501 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount 250.00 261.00 214.02 374.17 1,166.96 125.56 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/7/01 -6/7/01 617/01 1470.6180 100973 Vendor Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Account Description 19785 052501 5420.6188 TELEPHONE 19785 052501 5511.6188 TELEPHONE 19785 052501 5610.6188 TELEPHONE 19785 052501 5911.6188 TELEPHONE 19785 052501 5932.6188 TELEPHONE 19785 052501 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 19785 052501 5841.6188 TELEPHONE 19785 052501 5861.6188 TELEPHONE 222329 617/01 1470.6180 100973 RADIO SHACK 19882 24864 5630.6180 149.07 CENTENNIAL LAKES 19883 PHONES 1470.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 149.07 19884 375027070 1470.6408 222330 6/7/01 19885 104642 RCM SPECIALTIES INC. PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,100.00 PATCHER SERVICE 2,100.00 222331 617/01 102631 REAMER, MARK _ 726.00 SOFTBALL UMPIRE 726.00 222332 617/01 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY 127.25 FAUCET REPAIRS 292.30 WATER HEATER REPAIRS 419.55 222333 6 /7/01 101121 RITZ CAMERA CENTERS 19.79 PHOTO FINISHING 5.31 FILM 10.60 CAMERA BATTERY 35.70 222334 6/7101 101979 ROFIDAL, KEVIN 78.20 CONT. ED. (MEALS) 78.20 222335 6/7/01 102389 RYDER, ROBERT 154.00 - - SOFTBALL UMPIRE 154.00 19879 091790 19646 2247 19880 060201 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1314.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 617/01 8:11:20 Page - 23 Business Unit CLUB HOUSE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS ED ADMINISTRATION PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER GENERAL STORM SEWER 50TH ST OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY POOL OPERATION STREET RENOVATION 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 19881 24788 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 19882 24864 5630.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES 19883 375028290 1470.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 19884 375027070 1470.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 19885 375043920 1470.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 19886 060101 1400.6104 CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 19887 060201 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 222338 6 /7101 6/7/01 — 6/7101 100994 Check # Date Amount Vendor Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Account Description 222336 617/01 101961 SCHMITZ, THOMAS 45.69 168.04 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 19888 053101 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 168.04 45.69 222337 6 17/01 102352 SECURITY LINK FROM AMERITECH 20.00 ALARM SYSTEM 19786 49024267 5111.6250 ALARM SERVICE 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5301.4532 SEASON TICKETS 6/7/01 8:11:20 Page - 24 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT WATER TREATMENT AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES 5991.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WATER TREATMENT PLANT 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 5401.4603 COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS GOLF REVENUES 686.93 FERTILIZER 19891 157156SI 1643.6540 FERTILIZER 23.96- CREDIT ON ACCOUNT 19892 4/01 STMT. 1643.6540 FERTILIZER 662.97 222345 6/7/01 104666 SINOKROT, BASHAR 90.00 SEASON TICKET REFUND 19788 053101 90.00 5301.4532 SEASON TICKETS GENERAL TURF CARE GENERAL TURF CARE AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES 20.00 222338 6 /7101 100994 SEELYE PLASTICS 45.69 PVC, UNIONS, COUPLERS 19647 596391 45.69 222339 6/7/01 104679 SHANE, MEGAN 25.00 PARTIAL REFUND 19889 053101 25.00 222340 6/7/01 103935 SHANK CONTRACTORS INC. 26,743.45 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.6 19681 052501 26,743.45 222341 617/01 103249 SHANNON, JIM 100.00 JUNE 12 PERFORMANCE 19787 061201 100.00 222342 6!7/01 100834 SHEPARD, JOHN 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 19662 060701 100.00 222343 6 17/01 104682 SHIAN, MATTHEW 21.00 GHIN REFUND 19890 060101 21.00 222344 6 /7101 100301 SIMPLOT PARTNERS 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5301.4532 SEASON TICKETS 6/7/01 8:11:20 Page - 24 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT WATER TREATMENT AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES 5991.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WATER TREATMENT PLANT 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 5401.4603 COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS GOLF REVENUES 686.93 FERTILIZER 19891 157156SI 1643.6540 FERTILIZER 23.96- CREDIT ON ACCOUNT 19892 4/01 STMT. 1643.6540 FERTILIZER 662.97 222345 6/7/01 104666 SINOKROT, BASHAR 90.00 SEASON TICKET REFUND 19788 053101 90.00 5301.4532 SEASON TICKETS GENERAL TURF CARE GENERAL TURF CARE AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/7/01 -6/7/01 Check # Date Amount Vendor Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No 222346 617/01 104685 SKROCH, EFFIE 21.00 GHIN REFUND 19893 060101 6/7/01 8:11:20 Page- 25 Account No Account Description Business Unit 5401.4603 COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS GOLF REVENUES 19789 8022727RI 21.00 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 222347 6/7101 1260.6406 103234 SOKKIA MEASURING SYSTEMS 19916 5763 178.75 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX SURVEY SUPPLIES 157.62- SURVEY SUPPLIES 21.13 222348 6 /7101 104688 SOLDIER FACTORY, THE 170.69 170.69 222349 6 17/01 101002 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS INC 298.65 2,534.25 37.95 65.00 - 2,935.85 222350 617/01 103283 ST. CROIX RECREATION CO INC 172.95 VALVE CARTRIDGE, STRAINER 172.95 222351 617/01 102170 STAR OF THE NORTH CONCERT BAND 100.00 JUNE 13 PERFORMANCE 100.00 222352 6 /7/01 101007 STAR TRIBUNE 111.80 15 111.80 222353 6/7/01 101018 SUBURBAN PROPANE 148.39 L.P. FUEL 148.39 222354 6/7101 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 118.33 SUN PAPER ADVERTISING 118.33 SUN PAPER ADVERTISING 118.34 SUN PAPER ADVERTISING 355.00 6/7/01 8:11:20 Page- 25 Account No Account Description Business Unit 5401.4603 COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS GOLF REVENUES 19789 8022727RI 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 19790 8000934RM 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 19916 5763 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 20004 119682 20005 119692 20006 119693 20007 119694 19895 12148 19791 061301 19894 050801 19792 051701 19648 414548 19648 414548 19648 414548 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 5521.6581 GASOLINE ARENA ICE MAINT 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/7/01 — 6(7/01 Check # Date Amount Vendor Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Account Description 222355 617/01 103632 SUPERIOR PRODUCTS 474.99 BARSTOOLS 19896 3971797 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 19661 060701 19793 053001 617/01 8:11:20 Page - 26 Business Unit FIELD MAINTENANCE 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 1001.4390 REGISTRATION FEES GENERAL FUND REVENUES 19649 22319 -00 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 19794 195401 474.99 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 19897 222356 6/7/01 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 100794 SWANSON, HAROLD 228251 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 100.00 20009 228252 POLICE SERVICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 100.00 222357 6/7/01 104664 SWOFFORD, JILL 48.00 — — — PROGRAM REFUND 48.00 222358 617/01 101326 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO _629.29. TERMINALS, FUSE HOLDERS 629.29 222359 6/7/01 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 202.00 259.00 4,538.10 25.10 5,024.20 222360 617/01 101293 TODD, DARRELL 110.04 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 110.04 222361 6/7/01 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 46.11 WELDING SUPPLIES 46.11 222362 6/7/01 101706 TRACYITRIPP FUELS 1,6_72.38 — GASOLINE 1,672.38 222363 6/7/01 104675 TRAINING MAGAZINE 78.00 -- — SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL 78.00 222364 6/7/01 104677 TRANS -ALARM INC. 19661 060701 19793 053001 617/01 8:11:20 Page - 26 Business Unit FIELD MAINTENANCE 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 1001.4390 REGISTRATION FEES GENERAL FUND REVENUES 19649 22319 -00 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 19794 195401 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 19897 228588 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 20008 228251 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 20009 228252 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 19898 053101 1470.6106 MEETING EXPENSE 19650 106956 5422.6556 TOOLS 19651 83857 5422.6581 GASOLINE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 19899 060101 1470.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY OF EDINA FIRST AID SUPPLIES 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES Council Check Register 260.13 PAPER BAGS 617/01 -617/01 372545 Check # Date Amount TISSUE, TOWELL, CUPS, NAPKINS Vendor Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No 684.53 LIQUOR BAGS, TOWELS 20.00 372532 5842.6512 SEMINAR REGISTRATION 19901 053101 20.00 222365 6/7101 100336 TRESTMAN MUSIC CENTER 184.58 _ -- MUSIC STANDS & CABLE 19900 108207 184.58 222366 617/01 103218 TRI STATE BOBCAT 13.74 REPAIR PARTS 19652 P15929 13.74 222367 617/01 102255 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO 52.85 OXYGEN 19902 603547 72.06 OXYGEN REPAIRS 19903 602949 52.33 OXYGEN 19904 602284 52.33 OXYGEN 19905 602581 52.85, OXYGEN 19906 603366 52.85 OXYGEN 19907 602188 335.27 222368 6/7/01 100363 U S BANCORP _85.20 - BED FRAMES (MATTRESS GIANT) 19908 052901 85.20 222369 617/01 101908 US FOODSERVICE INC 241.64 CONCESSION PRODUCT 19909 040353 _ 207.3_0 FOOD 19910 034716 448.94 222370 6/7/01 100050 USPS 617/01 8:11:20 Page - 27 Account No Account Description Business Unit 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5630.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 4,000.00 ACCT. 75983 19819 POSTAGE 1550.6235 POSTAGE 4,000.00 222371 617/01 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 260.13 PAPER BAGS 19653 372545 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 534.36 TISSUE, TOWELL, CUPS, NAPKINS 19654 372817 1551.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 684.53 LIQUOR BAGS, TOWELS 19682 372532 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL POOL CONCESSIONS CENTENNIAL LAKES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL VERNON SELLING CITY HALL GENERAL YORK SELLING 222372 617101 104394 VANCE, LINDSEY 80.00 ADAPTIVE AA CLASS 19911 060101 1629.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADAPTIVE RECREATION R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # -- Date -- Amount -- - - Vendor Explanation - -- - - -- VERNON SELLING 19718 80.00 5862.5513 222373 6/7/01 20010 102499 VIEWPOINT INTERNATIONAL 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1,129.82 MERCHANDISE 060257 5822.5513 1,129.82 50TH ST SELLING 222374 6/7/01 5842.5513 101067 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER YORK SELLING 241.33 SAFETY SUPPLIES 241.33 222375 617/01 102886 WAGNER GREENHOUSES INC. 362.08 PLANTS, SOIL 926.82 PLANTS 1,288.90 222376 6/7/01 101080 WALSH, WILLIAM 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 100.00 222377 6/7/01 103466 WASTE MANAGEMENT - SAVAGE MN 2,701.97 REFUSE -- 2,701.97 222378 6/7/01 104681 WEBB, DONNA 37.50 TENNIS LESSON REFUND 37.50 222379 6/7/01 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 553.30 8.67 - 898.95 206.70 176.95- 1,473.33 222380 617/01 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 66.75- 809.10 345.50 301.00 CITY OF EDINA 6/7/01 8:11:20 Council Check Register Page - 28 617/01 -617/01 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Account Description Business Unit 19912 220471 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 19655 84883 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 19795 48R2001 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 19796 49R2001 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS STREET REVOLVING STREET REVOLVING 19660 060701 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 19683 1200959 -2282 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH -5 19913 053101 1001.4390 REGISTRATION FEES GENERAL FUND REVENUES 19717 060256 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 19718 060044 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 20010 060258 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 20011 060257 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 20012 060096 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 19719 13002 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 20013 43352 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 20014 43353 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 20015 43379 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date — Amount Vendor Explanation 1,388.85 222381 617/01 101082 WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY 158.97 GOLF BALLS, MARKERS 158.97 222382 6!7101 101084 WM H MCCOY 64.35 KEROSENE 64.35 222383 617/01 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 446.25 425.90 5_57.00 _ - 7,,429.15 222384 6/7/01 101087 WROBLESKI, HENRY _100.00 POLICE SERVICE 100.00 222385 617/01 101089 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 40.74 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 83.70 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 124.44 434,550.97 Grand Total CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 617/01 - 6/7101 PO # Doc No Inv No 19914 W92965 19656 104612 19720 106465 19721 106530 20016 106619 19665 060701 Account No Account Description 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5422.6581 GASOLINE 6/7101 6:11:20 Page - 29 Business Unit CENTENNIAL LAKES MAINT OF COURSE 8 GROUNDS 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 54067604 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 54165280 - 5430.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES Pa. itrument Totals Chec� al 434,550.97 Total Payments 434,550.97 GRILL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/7/01 8:19:17 Council Check Summary Page - 1 617/01 617/01 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 184,812.72 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 49.71 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 6,669.21 04800 CONSTRUCTION FUND 3,632.68 05100 ART CENTER FUND 2,189.41 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 4,599.85 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 1,660.84 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 16,926.91 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 9,972.93 05600 EDINBOROUGH/CENT LAKES FUND 6,624.18 05800 LIQUOR FUND 135,038.30 05900 UTILITY FUND 60,581.68 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 1,792.55 Report Totals 434,550.97 We confirm to the best of our knowledge . and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing polici and prose" d9te i R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount GENERAL SUPPLIES Vendor Explanation 222386 6/8/01 5610.6136 100686 CITY OF EDINA PAYROLL ACCOUNT 300,000.00 payroll funding 300,000.00 222387 6/14/01 100608 3M CO HGF0878 482.54 LETTERS AND NUMBERS 482.54 222388 6/14/01 100614 ACE SUPPLY 6.44 SIDEWALL 6.44 222389 6/14101 102609 ALL SAINTS BRANDS 1,226.40 384.00 1,610.40 222390 6/14/01 102715 ALLEGRA PRINT & IMAGING 372.75 2000 CAFR 372.75 222391 6/14/01 100624 ALTERNATOR REBUILD CO. 146.38 STARTER 146.38 222392 6/14/01 103957 AMERICAN VAN EQUIPMENT INC. 589.25 RACK, TOOL BOX 589.25 222393 6/14/01 104710 AMY & ADAMS 100.00 PERFORMANCE JUNE 18 100.00 222394 6/14/01 104693 ANDERSON SPRINKLER CO. 50.00 SPRINKLER REPAIRS 50.00 222395 6/14/01 102172 APPERT'S FOODSERVICE 57.42 BEEF FRANKS 193.83 FOOD 6.25- BANANAS CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/8/01 — 6/14/01 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Account Description 20310 6/8 PAYROLL 9900.1010 CASH TREASURER'S 20017 TP28237 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 20121 359422 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 6114/01 13:13:50 Page - 1 Business Unit PAYROLL CLEARING STREET NAME SIGNS CLUB HOUSE 20167 00000026 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 20168 00035989 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 20122 37936 1550.6575 PRINTING 20018 6/01 STMT 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 20245 00678616 5918.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VEHICLE OPERATION 20403 061801 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 20123 052501 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 20019 121627 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 20020 121215 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 20021 119370CR 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD DISTRIBUTION GRILL GRILL GRILL R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Vendor Explanation CITY HALL GENERAL 20024 245.00 1551.6406 222396 6/14/01 20025 104690 APPRAISAL FOUNDATION, THE 1550.6188 TELEPHONE 27.00 TEXTBOOK 060101 1470.6182 27.00 FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 222397 6/14101 1481.6182 104697 AQUA PURE SOLUTIONS METRO INC. YORK FIRE STATION 20246 159.75 WATER FILTRATION RUBBISH REMOVAL ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 159.75 060101 222398 6/14/01 GOLF DOME PROGRAM 101977 ARCH WIRELESS 060101 5422.6182 8.21 PAGER 20246 060101 17.69 PAGERS LITTER REMOVAL 20246 25.90 5420.6182 222399 6/14/01 20246 100634 ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO. 5111.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 69.96 ADAPTER 222400 6/14/01 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS 223.34 334.08 334.07 121.33 42.23 420.47 19.10 267.63 220.32 511.91 43.08 191.89 240.21 677.50 85.11 73.64 30.55 ens as 4,089.23 CITY OF EDINA 6/14/01 13:13:50 Council Check Register Page - 2 6/8/01 - 6/14/01 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Account Description Business Unit 20022 31576 -4074 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING 20023 242 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL 20024 K6096083F 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 20025 K3749609F 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 20026 615052 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 20246 060101 1551.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CITY HALL GENERAL 20246 060101 1301.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 20246 060101 1552.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING 20246 060101 1470.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 20246 060101 1481.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK FIRE STATION 20246 060101 5511.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 20246 060101 5210.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL GOLF DOME PROGRAM 20246 060101 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 20246 060101 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 20246 060101 5420.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CLUB HOUSE 20246 060101 5111.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT 20246 060101 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 20246 060101 5311.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL POOL OPERATION 20246 060101 5620.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL EDINBOROUGH PARK 20246 060101 5861.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL VERNON OCCUPANCY 20246 060101 5841.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK OCCUPANCY 20246 060101 5821.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 20246 060101 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 20246 060101 5430.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/8/01 - 6/14/01 Check # Date Amount Vendor Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No 222401 6/14/01 101954 AUGIE'S INC. 20170 222402 6114/01 62.41 FOOD 20027 12063 64.23 FOOD 20247 12174 80- FOOD 20404 11377 PERFORMANCE JUNE 19 222408 6114/01 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 126.33 35.44 319.75 204.85 364.25 2,386.75 Account No Account Description 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 20248 053101 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 20405 05/30 5431.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES 20028 12216 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 6/14/01 13:13:50 Page - 3 Business Unit RICHARDS GOLF COURSE RICHARDS GOLF COURSE RICHARDS GOLF COURSE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE STREET NAME SIGNS 20249 2327354 -89 04258.1705.200ONSULTING DESIGN T258PAMELA PARK/LAKE STORM 20249 2327354 -89 5932.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL STORM SEWER 20124 12261 20250 12262 20406 061901 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF CARS 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 20169 33987700 125.84 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 20170 222402 6114/01 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 103465 AUTO ELECTRIC SPECIALISTS 21454000 5822.5513 263.16 50TH ST SELLING 20352 REPAIR PARTS 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 263.16 20353 21486100 5842.5512 222403 6/14/01 20354 100638 BACHMAN'S COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 412.63 TREES 412.63 222404 6/14/01 100642 BANNERS TO GO 191.70 SIGNS 191.70 222405 6/14/01 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO. 1,169.20 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 251.18 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 1,420.38 222406 6/14/01 102449 BATTERY WHOLESALE INC. 111.05 CART BATTERIES 157.63 BATTERIES 268.68 222407 6/14/01 101245 BELL, BRUCE PERFORMANCE JUNE 19 222408 6114/01 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 126.33 35.44 319.75 204.85 364.25 2,386.75 Account No Account Description 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 20248 053101 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 20405 05/30 5431.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES 20028 12216 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 6/14/01 13:13:50 Page - 3 Business Unit RICHARDS GOLF COURSE RICHARDS GOLF COURSE RICHARDS GOLF COURSE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE STREET NAME SIGNS 20249 2327354 -89 04258.1705.200ONSULTING DESIGN T258PAMELA PARK/LAKE STORM 20249 2327354 -89 5932.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL STORM SEWER 20124 12261 20250 12262 20406 061901 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF CARS 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 20169 33987700 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 20170 33986200 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 20171 21454000 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 20352 21486600 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 20353 21486100 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 20354 21456800 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/8/01 -6114/01 Check # Date Amount Vendor Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Account Description 222409 6/14/01 104656 BERGREN, JENNIFER 83.14 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 20407 060701 1600.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 83.14 222410 6/14/01 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 4.25 OFFICE SUPPLIES 60.91 OFFICE SUPPLIES 15.52 PENS, ORGANIZER 45.28 PRICE TAG LABELS 57.91- RETURN 92.39 POST -ITS, LAMINATING POUCHS 53.20 DESK PAD, TRAY 14.75- OFFICE SUPPLIES 14.75 OFFICE SUPPLIES 63.87 OFFICE SUPPLIES 5.08 OFFICE SUPPLIES 14.75 OFFICE SUPPLIES 24.92 OFFICE SUPPLIES 24.28 OFFICE SUPPLIES 48.83 OFFICE SUPPLIES 38.59 OFFICE SUPPLIES 433.96 CM8820990 222411 6/14/01 100653 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS 420.46 ASPHALT 420.46 1160.6406 222412 6/14/01 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 478.88 VALVES, PEDAL 10.60 SLEEVES, CHARTS 153.87 PUMP, GASKETS, SEALS 222413 6/14/01 101516 BRAEMAR PRINTING 188.55 188.55 222414 6/14/01 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 69.25 20029 8816650 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 20029 8816650 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 20030 8814140 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 20251 8820410 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 20252 CM8814100 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 20253 8824270 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 20312 8818380 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 20408 CM8820990 1160.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 20409 8823600 1160.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 20410 8820991 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 20411 8820990 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 20411 8820990 1160.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 20411 8820990 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 20412 8836090 1160.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 20412 8836090 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 20412 8836090 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 20254 81617 .1301.6518 BLACKTOP 20031 278304 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 20032 276265 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 20033 275796 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 6/14/01 13:13:50 Page - 4 Business Unit PARK ADMIN. GENERAL PARK ADMIN. GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING GOLF ADMINISTRATION BUILDING MAINTENANCE FINANCE FINANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL INSPECTIONS FINANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL FINANCE ENGINEERING GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GIFT CERTIFICATE PRINTING 20413 55649 5410.6575 PRINTING GOLF ADMINISTRATION CONCRETE TESTING 20414 200530 1260.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEERING GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/8/01 — 6/14101 Check # Date Amount Vendor Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Account Description 222415 6/14/01 104703 BRIDGES, AMANDA 26000 EDINA ART FAIR 20125 060301 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 20255 EG14805001 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 20256 EG14802901 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 20126 7000078 -0500 5952.6183 RECYCLING CHARGES 1 -0500 20034 060501 1001.4722 RENTAL OF PROPERTY 20035 053101 1642.6542 INFIELD MIXTURE 20036 1746398 260.00 ADVERTISING LEGAL 20037 222416 6/14101 ADVERTISING 100667 BROCK WHITE COMPANY 1736872 1120.6120 ADVERTISING 3,396.29 20039 1731743 GRANITE PANELS ADVERTISING LEGAL 196.39 1746397 1120.6120 BLADE, TUBES LEGAL 20415 3,592.68 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 222417 6/14/01 1120.6120 100058 BROWNING FERRIS INDUSTRIES OF 29,618.50 RECYCLING 29,618.50 222418 6/14/01 104691 BRUCE, RALPH 216.00 PARK RESERVATION REFUND 216.00 222419 6/14/01 100669 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC. 242.07 BALLFIELD LIME 242.07 222420 6/14101 101111 CAHNERS 122,25 AD FOR BID 122,25 AD FOR BID 91,28 AD FOR BID 91,28 AD FOR BID 91,28 AD FOR BID 229,83 AD FOR BID 229.83 AD FOR BID 978.00 222421 6114101 102051 CAMPBELL GROUP, THE 486.00 UNIFORM CAPS 486.00 222422 6114/01 103268 CARLSON, DAVID 79.99 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 79.99 222423 6/14101 100681 CATCO 20255 EG14805001 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 20256 EG14802901 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 20126 7000078 -0500 5952.6183 RECYCLING CHARGES 1 -0500 20034 060501 1001.4722 RENTAL OF PROPERTY 20035 053101 1642.6542 INFIELD MIXTURE 20036 1746398 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 20037 1736873 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 20038 1736872 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 20039 1731743 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 20040 1746397 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 20415 1752729 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 20416 1760344 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 20417 201056 5630.6201 LAUNDRY 20467 060801 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 6/14/01 13:13:50 Page - 5 Business Unit STREET REVOLVING STREET REVOLVING STREET REVOLVING RECYCLING GENERAL FUND REVENUES FIELD MAINTENANCE ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION CENTENNIAL LAKES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/8/01 -6/14101 Check # Date Amount Vendor Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No 89.46- CORE RETURNS 20042 3 -62208 158.94 SLEEVE, FITTING, HOSE END 20043 3 -61839 69.48 222424 6/14/01 100690 CLEAN-FLO INTERNATIONAL 905.40 ASSESSMENT CONTRACT WORK 20044 8638 425.20 ASSESSMENT CONTRACT WORK 20257 8631 1,330.60 222425 6/14/01 104714 COLLIE 8 MCVOY 108.00 RESERVATION CANCELATION REFUND 20418 060801 108.00 222426 6/14/01 101323 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS 215.64 RAIN GEAR, BOOTS 20045 01543205 60.79 EARPLUGS, INSECT REPELLENT 20258 01546250 18.36 OVER BOOTS 20259 01545804 294.79 222427 6/14/01 100698 COPY EQUIPMENT INC. 114.43 PLAN REPRODUCTION 20046 0201296 518.87 COPY SERVICES 20260 0201969 212.84 PLAN REPRO 20261 0201818 846.14 222428 6/14/01 103171 CORPORATE ADVERTISING 8 INCENT 891.61 POOL UNIFORMS 20262 97426 750.00 POOL UNIFORMS 20262 97426 518.65 NAME TAGS 20263 97425 2,160.26 222429 6/14/01 104708 CRONSTROMS HEATING & A/C Account No Account Description 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 6/14/01 13:13:50 Page - 6 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 4086.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AQUATIC WEEDS 4086.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AQUATIC WEEDS 1001.4722 RENTAL OF PROPERTY GENERAL FUND REVENUES 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1550.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 1495.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSPECTIONS 5311.6201 LAUNDRY POOL OPERATION 5320.6201 LAUNDRY POOL CONCESSIONS 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 46.80 CANCEL APPLICATION 20264 ED008183 1001.4115 MECHANICAL PERMITS GENERAL FUND REVENUES 46.80 222430 6114/01 103330 CRYSTEEL TRUCK EQUIPMENT 10,359.68 COMPLETION OF TRUCK 20047 F10654 5400.1740 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT GOLF BALANCE SHEET 10,359.68 222431 6/14/01 103457 CUMMINGS, JEANNE 60.00 SWIMMING LESSON REFUND 20419 060801 1001.4390 REGISTRATION FEES GENERAL FUND REVENUES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/8/01 - 6/14/01 Check # Date Amount Vendor Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No 60.00 222432 6/14/01 101805 DAVID A. KIRSCHT ASSOCIATES IN 500.00 ARCHITECT FEES - PO 6474 500.00 222433 6/14101 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING 187.60 2,268.20 18.40 71.00 18.40 2,108.55 4,672.15 222434 6/14101 104713 DECKER, DEB 53.00 TENNIS LESSON REFUND 53.00 20173 222435 6/14101 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 52.79 BAKERY 165.49 INV 99656, 99737, 99767 20.53 BAKERY 56.17 BAKERY 49.03 BAKERY 344.01 YORK SELLING 222436 6/14/01 102712 DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION Account No Account Description 6/14/01 13:13:50 Page - 7 Business Unit 20420 2106 5422.6251 SHARED MAINTENANCE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 20172 137571 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 20173 137570 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 20174 137574 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 20175 137575 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 20355 137576 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 20356 137572 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 20421 060801 1001.4390 REGISTRATION FEES 20048 101452 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 20049 5131 STMT 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 20265 101547 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD, 20266 101496 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 20422 101544 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 20050 W01040646 1622.6188 TELEPHONE 20050 W01040646 2210.6188 TELEPHONE 20050 W01040646 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 20050 W01040646 5841.6188 TELEPHONE 20050 W01040646 5861.6188 TELEPHONE 20050 W01040646 1646.6188 TELEPHONE 20050 W01040646 1646.6188 TELEPHONE 20050 W01040646 1646.6188 TELEPHONE 20050 W01040646 1646.6188 TELEPHONE 20050 W01040646 1628.6188 TELEPHONE 20050 W01040646 5311.6188 TELEPHONE 20050 W01040646 1481.6188 TELEPHONE 20050 W01040646 1550.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL FUND REVENUES GRILL GRILL GRILL GRILL GRILL SKATING & HOCKEY COMMUNICATIONS 50TH ST OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE SENIOR CITIZENS POOL OPERATION YORK FIRE STATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Vendor Explanation 92.96 166.28 15.04 60.16 90.42 60.16 45.35 HISTORICAL 15.04 ARNESON 15.04 GREENHOUSE 221.62 CARD ACCESS -PARKS 45.37 W01040646 15.88 TELEPHONE 76.33 W01040646 75.20 TELEPHONE 95.00 W01040646 240.13 TELEPHONE 9.01 W01040646 52.84 TELEPHONE 1,391.83 W01040639 222437 6/14/01 101691 DON BETZEN GOLF CO. TELEPHONE 368.50 BALL MARKERS CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/8/01 - 6/14/01 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Account Description 20050 W01040646 5111.6188 TELEPHONE 20050 W01040646 5610.6188 TELEPHONE 20050 W01040646 5511.6188 TELEPHONE 20050 W01040646 5210.6188 TELEPHONE 20050 W01040646 5420.6188 TELEPHONE 20051 W01040639 1622.6188 TELEPHONE 20051 W01040639 2210.6188 TELEPHONE 20051 W01040639 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 20051 W01040639 5841.6188 TELEPHONE 20051 W01040639 5861.6188 TELEPHONE 20051 W01040639 1646.6188 TELEPHONE 20051 W01040639 1646.6188 TELEPHONE 20051 W01040639 1646.6188 TELEPHONE 20051 W01040639 1646.6188 TELEPHONE 20051 W01040639 1628.6188 TELEPHONE 20051 W01040639 5311.6188 TELEPHONE 20051 W01040639 1481.6188 TELEPHONE 20051 W01040639 1550.6188 TELEPHONE 20051 W01040639 5111.6188 TELEPHONE 20051 W01040639 5610.6188 TELEPHONE 20051 W01040639 5511.6188 TELEPHONE 20051 W01040639 5210.6188 . TELEPHONE 20423 12875 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 222438 6/14/01 101791 DORFNER, MARK 59.98 UNIFORM REIMBURSEMENT 59.98 222439 6/14/01 100730 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 3,200.25 LEGAL 3,200.25 222440 6/14/01 100736 E -Z -GO TEXTRON 575.10 GOLF CART BATTERIES 222441 6/14/01 100739 EAGLE WINE 20313 060701 5620.6201 LAUNDRY 6/14/01 13:13:50 Page - 8 Business Unit ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT ED ADMINISTRATION ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS GOLF DOME PROGRAM CLUB HOUSE SKATING & HOCKEY COMMUNICATIONS 50TH ST OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE SENIOR CITIZENS POOL OPERATION YORK FIRE STATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT ED ADMINISTRATION ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS GOLF DOME PROGRAM GOLF ADMINISTRATION EDINBOROUGH PARK 20052 874086 1195.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL LEGAL SERVICES 20424 0770637 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF CARS R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Vendor Explanation GIFT BAGS Page - 9 261.40 68.03 Business Unit 5822.5513 749.72 6/14/01 5862.5513 100734 1,275.38 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 424.35 2,286.50 CLASS 5 FOR WATER BREAKS 222442 6114101 424.35 100741 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 222446 56.90 100015 EKLUND TREE RECYCLING 249.00 200.00 4,127.45 200.00 2,594.10 222447 6/14/01 7,027.45 102865 222443 6114/01 100742 ECOLAB PEST ELIMINATION DIVISI BALLOTS FOR SPECIAL ELECTION 110.23 PEST CONTROL 1,194.08 110.23 222448 222444 6/14/01 104637 102340 . EDMUNDS, LIZ CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 618/01 —6/14/01 PO # Doc No Inv No 20176 388205 20177 387751 20178 387761 20179 798548 20267 797426 20357 799144 20358 798550 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 68.03 5421.5514 GIFT BAGS Page - 9 Account No 68.03 Business Unit 5822.5513 222445 6/14/01 5862.5513 100734 EDWARD KRAEMER & SONS INC. 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 424.35 CLASS 5 FOR WATER BREAKS 424.35 222446 6/14101 100015 EKLUND TREE RECYCLING 200.00 TREE WASTE 200.00 222447 6/14/01 102865 ELECTION SYSTEMS & SOFTWARE IN 1,194,08 BALLOTS FOR SPECIAL ELECTION 1,194.08 222448 6/14/01 104637 ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION INN 18,000.00 WATERSLIDE REFURBISHMENT 18,000.00 222449 6/14/01 101401 EQUIPMENT SUPPLY INC. 501.40 ICE MACHINE MAINTENANCE 501.40 222450 6/14101 101654 ERV'S LAWN MOWER REPAIR INC. 20179 798548 20267 797426 20357 799144 20358 798550 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 6/14/01 13:13:50 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER Page - 9 Account No Account Description Business Unit 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 20314 7652168 5620.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENTEDINBOROUGH PARK 20180 42 20127 107487 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5913.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK 20053 PO 5817 1644.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 20315 461665 1184.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 20054 01 -004 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 20055 182051 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION TREES & MAINTENANCE SPECIAL ELECTIONS POOL OPERATION POOL OPERATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/8101 - 6/14/01 Check # Date Amount Vendor Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Account Description 44.68 BELT 20268 40288 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 6/14/01 13:13:50 Page - 10 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 20128 060401 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 20181 15636 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 20056 060101 44.68 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FAMILINK EDINA 20057 222451 6/14/01 GENERAL SUPPLIES 100018 EXPERT T BILLING GENERAL SUPPLIES 20316 053101 3,230.00 CLEANING SUPPLIES MAY - BILLING 3,230.00 222452 6/14101 104195 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC. 160.00 160.00 222453 6/14/01 100054 FAMILINK 15,571.00 2ND HALF FUNDING 15,571.00 222454 6/14/01 100756 FEDERAL EXPRESS 26.92 PRIORITY MAILING 26.92 222455 6/14/01 100758 FLANAGAN SALES 311.75 PLASTIC GARBAGE TOPS 311.75 222456 6/14/01 104694 FOGARTY, WILLIAM 167.92 SPRINKLER SYSTEM REPAIR 167.92 222457 6/14/01 100179 FRAGALE, ANNETTE 100.00 PERFORMANCE JUNE 21 100.00 222458 6/14/01 104071 FREUND, JEFF 83.21 PLANTS 150.65 SUPPLIES 233.86 222459 6/14/01 100764 G ✓# K SERVICES 21.30 29.24 182.60 6/14/01 13:13:50 Page - 10 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 20128 060401 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 20181 15636 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 20056 060101 1507.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FAMILINK EDINA 20057 5- 803 -61863 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 20058 9802 20059 060401 20425 062101 1645.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LITTER REMOVAL 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 20426 060801 5620.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH PARK 20426 060801 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 20316 053101 5511.6201 LAUNDRY 20316 053101 1551.6201 LAUNDRY 20316 053101 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 20316 053101 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS CITY HALL GENERAL STREET REVOLVING CENT SVC PW BUILDING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount BA -314 78TH 8 CAHILL Vendor Explanation 59134 PO # Doc No 77.04 20316 053101 20316 053101 281.48 053101 20316 053101 39293 470.26 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 20190 386158 239.72 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 20191 387755 1,301.64 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 222460 6/14/01 5862.5515 104716 GALE -TEC ENGINEERING INC. 20193 387759 278.10 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR W. 78TH ST. SLOPENVALL 20194 387760 278.10 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 222461 6/14/01 5842.5512 100775 GENERAL SPORTS CORPORATION 20196 386160 210.00 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR GOAL NETS 210.00 222462 6/14/01 102670 GRAND PERE WINES INC 173.00 173.00 222463 6/14/01 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 67.00 428.00 1,276.66 446.00 2,217.66 222464 6114101 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. 64.56 PVC, CONDUIT 222465 6/14/01 100782 GRIGGS COOPER 8 CO. 4,944.60 286.50 1,979.00 1,047.73 1,036.90 137.90 28.70 1,086.98 26.20 .70 1,954.50 CITY OF EDINA 623 Council Check Register BA -314 78TH 8 CAHILL 6 /8 /01 - 6/14/01 59134 PO # Doc No Inv No 20316 053101 20316 053101 20316 053101 20316 053101 Account No Account Description 5910.6201 LAUNDRY 1553.6201 LAUNDRY 1301.6201 LAUNDRY . 1646.6201 LAUNDRY 6/14/01 13:13:50 Page - 11 Business Unit GENERAL (BILLING) EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 20427 623 01314.1705.2000NSULTING DESIGN BA -314 78TH 8 CAHILL 20129 59134 1621.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES 20182 00008398 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 20183 39169 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 20184 39291 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 20185 39292 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 20359 39293 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 20317 1041063171 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 20186 387764 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 20187 387763 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 20188 385187 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 20189 386162 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 20190 386158 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 20191 387755 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 20192 387752 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 20193 387759 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 20194 387760 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 20195 371653 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 20196 386160 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/14/01 13:13:50 Council Check Register Page - 12 6/8101 — 6/14101 Check # Date Amount Vendor Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Account Description Business Unit 247.00 20197 386161 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,180.08 20360 387757 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 49.30 20361 387756 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 14,006.09 222466 6/14/01 104695 HALL, IRENE 92.00 CLASS REFUND 20060 060201 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 92.00 222467 6/14/01 104701 HALSELL, PATRICIA 220.00 EDINA ART FAIR 20130 060301 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET REVOLVING 220.00 222468 6/14/01 100795 HARRIS HOMEYER CO. 18,201.00 WORKERS COMP. INSURANCE 20131 22560 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 24,090.00 GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE 20132 22559 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 42,291.00 222469 6/14/01 100797 HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT 2,134.32 CHEMICALS 20428 352634 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 2,134.32 222470 6114/01 100799 HEDBERG AGGREGATES 98.00 SAND, HAULING 20133 00340315 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 98.00 222471 6/14/01 104705 HEDREN, MICHAEL 323.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 20134 060601 1001.4329 AMBULANCE FEES GENERAL FUND REVENUES 323.00 222472 6/14/01 101576 HEGGIES PIZZA 66.00 PIZZA 20269 73654 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 66.00 222473 6/14101 101209 HEIMARK FOODS 214.80 MEAT PATTIES 20061 015257 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 214.80 222474 6/14/01 102484 HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MANUFACTURI 428.13 FIELD STRIPING PAINT 20270 53803 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER FIELD MAINTENANCE 428.13 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/8/01 -6/14/01 PO # Doc No Inv No 20429 062001 Check # Date Amount GENERAL SUPPLIES Vendor Explanation 222475 6/14/01 1646.6406 100267 HOPKINS WESTWIND BAND 20064 0217 - 463040 75.00 PAINT PERFORMANCE JUNE 20 20135 0217 - 463041 75.00 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 222476 6/14/01 1301.6406 100417 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY 20271 0217 - 463219 196.19 GENERAL SUPPLIES CHLORINE, ACID 20319 359183 196.19 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENTEDINBOROUGH PARK 222477 6/14/01 5620.6230 100842 HOUSEHOLD BANK F.S.B. (KNOX) 30.34 KEY SAFE 97.58 TIMER, HOSE 113.36 PAINT 56.45 TIE - DOWNS, STUDS 8.22 PHILLIPS BIT, DRYWALL 100.45 DRYWALL, STUDS 406.40 222478 6/14/01 102114 HUEBSCH 62.82 TOWELS, RUGS 24.67 TOWELS 67.49 222479 6/14/01 102201 INDEPENDENT BLACK DIRT CO INC 276.34 BALLFIELD CLAY 276.34 222480 6/14/01 101732 INDUSTRIAL DOOR CO. INC. 492.00 GARAGE DOOR REPAIRS 492.00 222481 6/14101 104712 INGRAM EXCAVATING INC. 22,168.80 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 22,168.80 222482 6/14/01 104696 INT'L SECURITY PRODUCTS 52.04 ALUMINUM TIES 52.04 222483 6/14101 101861 J.H. LARSON COMPANY 153.07 CONDUIT, PVC, ADAPTERS 6/14/01 13:13:50 Page - 13 Account No Account Description Business Unit 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 20318 1053106 5620.6545 CHEMICALS EDINBOROUGH PARK 20062 0217 - 463398 1644.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TREES & MAINTENANCE 20063 0217 - 463381 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 20064 0217 - 463040 5511.6532 PAINT ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 20135 0217 - 463041 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 20136 0217- 463294 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 20271 0217 - 463219 5821.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 20319 359183 5620.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENTEDINBOROUGH PARK 20320 363249 5620.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENTEDINBOROUGH PARK 20137 7541 1642.6542 INFIELD MIXTURE FIELD MAINTENANCE 20430 0059838 -IN 5424.6530 REPAIR PARTS RANGE 20431 061501 01322.1705.3000NTRACTOR PAYMENTS BA -322 DREW AVE - W 66TH TO 6! 20065 10118 1642.6530 REPAIR PARTS 20138 4229098 -01 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE DISTRIBUTION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/14/01 13:13:50 Council Check Register Page - 14 6/8101 - 6/14/01 Check # Date Amount Vendor Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Account Description Business Unit 28.71- CREDIT 20139 4529878 -00 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 124.36 222484 6/14101 100828 JERRY'S FOODS 144.73 20321 040101 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 30.12 20321 040101 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 37.74 20321 040101 1629.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 85.48 20322 3/29 ART 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CENTER 12.57 20323 3 -29 ART 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CENTER 51.75 20324 4126 ART 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CENTER 108.89 20325 5/19 ART 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CENTER 471.28 222485 6114101 100829 JERRYS HARDWARE 6.10 20140 053101 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 148.21 20140 053101 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 13.34 20140 053101 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 173.30 20140 053101 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS 114.94 20140 053101 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET REVOLVING 94.27 20140 053101 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 230.77 20140 053101 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 29.29 20140 053101 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 7.15 20140 053101 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 266.23 20140 053101 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 78.14 20140 053101 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 846.68 20140 053101 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 164.95 20140 053101 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 30.75 20140 053101 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 12.52 20140 053101 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 22.96 20140 053101 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 73.13 20140 053101 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 553.06 20140 053101 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 393.01 20140 053101 5911.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER 25.56 20140 053101 5820.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH STREET GENERAL 4.92 20140 053101 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 6.55 20140 053101 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 3,295.83 CITY OF EDINA 6/14/01 13:13:50 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 15 618101 - 6/14101 Check # Date Amount Vendor Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Account Description Business Unit 222486 6/14/01 100830 JERRY'S PRINTING 10.65 PO 4194 20432 18496 1180.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ELECTION 10.65 222487 6114/01 102146 JESSEN PRESS 612.38 AQUATIC CENTER POSTCARDS 20326 42707 5310.6575 PRINTING POOL ADMINISTRATION 612.38 222488 6/14101 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 120.75- 20198 159922 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 71.40 20362 1264275 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,273.60 20363 1264272 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 594.75 20364 1264277 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,557.48 20365 1264278 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,168.30 20366 1264279 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,243.07 20367 1264281 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,297.48 20368 1264274 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 30.74 20369 1264273 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 66.50 20370 1264271 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,446.41 20371 1264269 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,104.13 20372 1264270 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 10,733.11 222489 6/14/01 102113 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY OF GOLDEN VAL 65.26 MOTOR 20272 186952 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 65.26 222490 6/14101 104700 JONES, LINDA 53.00 TENNIS LESSON REFUND 20141 060501 1001.4390 REGISTRATION FEES GENERAL FUND REVENUES 53.00 222491 6/14/01 104715 JOURNEYWORKS PUBLISHING 506.00 SMOKING INFO 20433 060801 4083.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TOBACCO FREE GRANT 506.00 222492 6/14/01 101322 JULIEN. DIANE 25.00 NOTARY COMM. ADDRESS CHANGE 20066 060101 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 25.00 222493 6/14/01 100839 KAMAN INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGIES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/14/01 13:13:50 Council Check Register Page - 16 6/8/01 -6/14/01 Check # Date Amount Vendor Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Account Description Business Unit 343.91 BALL BEARING, FLANGE 20142 Z197706 5910.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL (BILLING) 343.91 222494 6/14/01 101514 KASPRICK, JOHN 21.00 20273 060401 5860.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 6.39 COPIES 20273 060401 5860.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 27.39 222495 6/14/01 100944 KIWI KAI IMPORTS INC. 3,072.50 20199 152372 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,858.40 20200 152370 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,032.95 20201 152371 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5,963.85 222496 6/14/01 101995 KUDOS INC. 34.08 RECOGNITION PLAQUE 20067 46742 1504.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION 34.08 222497 6/14/01 100846 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO 2,716.00 20202 299382 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 36.00 20373 299784 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 2,752.00 222498 6114/01 104699 KUNZ, BARBARA 237.00 TENNIS CAMP REFUNDS 20143 060501 1001.4390 REGISTRATION FEES GENERAL FUND REVENUES 237.00 222499 6114101 101494 LARSEN, PHILIP 76.44 FOOD FOR MEETING 20464 060801 1400.6106 MEETING EXPENSE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 76.44 222500 6/14/01 101840 LARSON, BOB 65.97 UNIFORM REIMBURSEMENT 20434 060801 5630.6201 LAUNDRY CENTENNIAL LAKES 65.97 222501 6/14/01 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 55.43 THREAD ROD 20274 8131697 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 10.22 THREAD ROD 20275 8125590 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 65.65 222502 6/14/01 100853 LEEF SERVICES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/8/01 -6114101 PO # Doc No Inv No 20276 482609 Check # Date Amount EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT Vendor Explanation 1220436 -01 1553.6530 29.39 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 20278 TOWELS 5422.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT 29.39 20206 285190 5842.5515 222503 6/14/01 20207 100854 LEITNER COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 20208 3,310.08 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX SOIL 20209 284816 1,125.28 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING SOIL 285170 5862.5514 4,435.36 VERNON SELLING 222504 6/14/01 103526 LOFFLER BUSINESS SYSTEMS 207.68 COPIER AGREEMENT 207.68 222505 6/14/01 101843 LONG, JEFF 406.46 UNIFORM REIMBURSEMENT 406.46 222506 6/14/01 100864 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. 254.57 POLY BROOMS 254,57 POLY BROOMS 509.14 222507 6/14101 104706 MACHINE TOOL SUPPLY 6,549.75 DRILL PRESS 1,824,29 ARBOR, VISE, TABLE 8,374.04 222508 6114/01 100865 MAGNUSON SOD /HAAG SERVICES 109.05 SOD 109.05 222509 6/14/01 100868 MARK VII SALES 105.75 901.00 2,409.40 24.60 32.70 32.55 2,925.65 837.20 Account No Account Description 5422.6201 LAUNDRY 20144 060101 -RICHA 5431.6530 REPAIR PARTS RDS 20145 060101 -BRAEM 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS AR 20277 105056922 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 20465 060801 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 20068 2014521 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 20069 2014549 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 6/14/01 13:13:50 Page - 17 Business Unit MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CENT SVC PW BUILDING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 20146 1220398 -02 1553.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 20327 1220436 -01 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 20278 56278 5422.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 20203 285191 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 20204 285171 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 20205 285189 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 20206 285190 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 20207 284818 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 20208 284817 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 20209 284816 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 20210 285170 5862.5514 . COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Vendor 6/14/01 13:13:50 Council Check Register .03 37.00 20328 Page - 18 .03 GENERAL SUPPLIES 37.00 62841 1,553.40 Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 29.25 Business Unit 20374 288082 8,851.56 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 222510 6/14/01 288083 100879 MEDICA CHOICE COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 334.84 288084 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 334.84 20377 222511 6/14/01 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 101483 MENARDS 47.65 222516 51.26 100891 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. 45.67 238.83 42.87 26.63 187.45 TACK 222512 6/14/01 100882 MERIT SUPPLY 334.17 540.04 CITY OF EDINA 6/14/01 5422.6406 103192 6/14/01 13:13:50 Council Check Register 5424.6406 37.00 20328 Page - 18 6/8/01 - 6/14/01 GENERAL SUPPLIES 37.00 62841 5422.6577 Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Account Description Business Unit 20374 288082 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 20375 288083 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 20376 288084 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 20377 287937 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT- B.FENTON 20147 060601 1001.4329 AMBULANCE FEES SUPPLIES TRIM, PAINT SAND, SEED, ROCK WATER COOLER REPAIRS CLEANING PRODUCTS HUDSON SPRAYERS TOWELS, CLEANERS CLEANERS 222513 6/14/01 5422.6406 103192 METRO LEGAL SERVICES 63144 5424.6406 37.00 20328 TITLEITAX SEARCH 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 37.00 62841 5422.6577 222514 6/14/01 56657 100686 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 20280 56722 1,138.50 TOOLS SAC FOR MAY 2001 56649 5620.6511 1,138.50 20330 56720 222515 6/14101 100887 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONME 210,040.00 SEWER SERVICES 210,040.00 222516 6/14/01 100891 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. 238.83 ASPHALT 26.63 TACK 265.46 20070 61234 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 20279 63144 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 20328 63431 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 20435 62841 5422.6577 LUMBER 20071 56657 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 20280 56722 1301.6556 TOOLS 20329 56649 5620.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 20330 56720 5620.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES GENERAL FUND REVENUES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS RANGE EDINBOROUGH PARK MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK 20072 224449 2127.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMM DEV BLK GRANT 20436 060601 1001.4307 SAC CHARGES GENERAL FUND REVENUES 20331 0000723091 5922.6302 SEWER SERVICE METRO SEWER TREATMENT 20332 68975MB 5913.6518 BLACKTOP 20333 17227MB 5913.6518 BLACKTOP DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount 5421.5510 Vendor Explanation 222517. 6/14/01 COST OF GOODS SOLD 100692 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLING COM COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 544.60 COST OF GOODS SOLD RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 38.00 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5421.5510 80.00- GRILL 128.26 233.20 106.45 367.84 304.50 1,642.85 222518 6/14/01 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 1,575.00 FOUNTAIN LINE 1,500.00 WATER SERVICE 1,200.00 WATER SERVICE 1,200.00 WATER SERVICE 5,475.00 222519 6/14/01 103216 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPARTMENT 13,932.70 WATER PURCHASE 13,932.70 222520 6/14/01 102174 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 4.95 GAS 4.95 222521 6/14101 101376 MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPMENT 9,07 VALVE BOX LID 9.07 222522 6/14/01 100899 MINNESOTA STATE TREASURER 5,154.15 SURCHARGE FOR MAY 2001 5,154.15 222523 6/14/01 101996 MINNESOTA TROPHIES & GIFTS 179.24 EXPLORERS PLAQUE 179.24 222524 6/14/01 101385 MITY -LITE INC 1,719.79 TABLES 1,719.79 CITY OF EDINA uncil Check Register /01 —6/14/01 PO # Doc No Inv No 20073 67007020 20074 67007038 20075 67007046 20211 60394058 20281 62235238 20282 67087064 20378 60756129 20437 67010123 6/14101 13:13:50 Page - 19 account No Account Description Business Unit 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 20076 31951 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 20077 31959 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 20078 31960 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 20149 31962 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 20283 060501 5913.6601 WATER PURCHASED 20079 RI05010171 5430.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 20150 0100195 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 20438 060601 1001.4380 SURCHARGE 20468 102042 1419.6106 MEETING EXPENSE 20439 381040 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET REVOLVING DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION RICHARDS GOLF COURSE COLLECTION SYSTEMS GENERAL FUND REVENUES RESERVE PROGRAM CENTENNIAL LAKES CITY OF EDINA 6/14/01 13:13:50 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 20 618/01 - 6/14101 Check # Date Amount Vendor Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Account Description Business Unit 222525 6/14101 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 81.34 360 DRIVE ASSEMBLY 20151 69164 -00 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 55.19 TRACTOR TUBE 20152 67654 -01 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 119.43 VALVE BOXES, COVER 20284 70569 -00 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 255.96 222526 6/14/01 100914 MUNICILITE CO. 169.97 SLIMLIGHTER 20334 1871 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 169.97 222527 6/14/01 101710 NELSON, DAN 30.00 BASKETBALL 20440 060801 1629.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 30.00 222528 6/14/01 103224 NELSON, LARRY 50.00 REIMBURSE FOR GOLF LESSON 20441 060701 5201.4543 GOLF DOME RECEIPTS GOLF DOME REVENUES 50.00 222529 6/14101 100929 NORTH STAR ICE 73.50 20212 12115302 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 126.00 20213 12115207 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 14.82 20214 02115513 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 25.94 20215 12115306 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 102.52 20216 12115307 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 18.03 20379 06115717 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 360.81 222530 6/14/01 101631 NORTH STAR INTERNATIONAL TRUCK 7.65 NUTS 20285 314321 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 75.90 LINK 20286 320882 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 8.07 TUBE 20287 316290 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 79.49 END, TUBE 20288 318681 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 30.35 LIGHT, SPRING, SCREWS 20289 317964 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 74.40 LINK 20290 316052 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 253.00- CORE RETURN 20291 317153 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 22.86 222531 6114101 100925 NORTH STAR TURF 212.64 REPAIR PARTS 20442 253773 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 24.69 REPAIR PARTS 20443 253756 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Vendor Explanation 237.33 Page - 21 6/8/01 — 6/14/01 222532 6/14/01 103133 NORTHERN TOOL & EQUIPMENT Account No Account Description 516.38 20153 WATER PUMP 5932.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 516.38 AIR 20311 3367 04253.1705.3000NTRACTOR PAYMENTS 222533 6/14101 052301 104707 O- ROURKE, ANNE ED ADMINISTRATION 20444 052301 158.20 GENERAL SUPPLIES ED ADMINISTRATION SPRINKLER SYSTEM REP 95067 1553.6530 158.20 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 20293 94953 222534 6/14/01 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 101592 OFFICEMAX CREDIT PLAN 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 31.32 48850 5620.6180 ACCT 6011584300016000 EDINBOROUGH PARK 20336 91.27 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ACCT 6011584300016000 20337 052701 122.59 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1 20469 222535 6/14/01 P.E.R.A. PAYABLE 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 128.83 CLEVIS HOOKS, RINGS 193.73 CHAINS 322.56 222536 6/14101 100939 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC. 129.50 COOKIES 129.50 222537 6/14/01 100940 OWENS SERVICES CORP. 521.87 MCQUAY UNIT REPAIRS 521.87 222538 6/14101 103251 PAPERDIRECT INC 121.91 DECORATIVE PAPER 121.91 222539 6/14101 101718 PARTS PLUS 2,833.94 REPAIR PARTS 2,833.94 222540 6/14101 100946 PERA 58.86 CONTRIBUTIONS 6/05/200 58.86 222541 6/14/01 100946 PERA CITY OF EDINA 6114101 13:13:50 Council Check Register Page - 21 6/8/01 — 6/14/01 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Account Description Business Unit 20153 4476748 5932.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL STORM SEWER AIR 20311 3367 04253.1705.3000NTRACTOR PAYMENTS T253 STORM SEWER BRIDGE ST 20444 052301 5610.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ED ADMINISTRATION 20444 052301 5610.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ED ADMINISTRATION 20292 95067 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 20293 94953 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 20080 75882712 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 20335 48850 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 20336 332235450001 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 20337 052701 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1 20469 061101 1000.2023 P.E.R.A. PAYABLE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/8/01 - 6114101 5.00- 20217 3240094 Check # Date Amount Vendor Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Account Description 68,433.64 CONTRIBUTIONS 610512001 20470 06/11 1000.2023 P.E.R.A. PAYABLE 68,433.64 3240093 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 222542 6/14101 100950 PETTY CASH 20220 3240095 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 25.00 20309 060701 1629.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 3.00 20309 060701 1644.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 4.40 20309 060701 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE 26.37 20309 060701 1120.6106 MEETING EXPENSE 17.16 20309 060701 1120.6188 TELEPHONE 3.40 20309 060701 1120.6235 POSTAGE 11.07 20309 060701 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 6.00 20309 060701 1140.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 87.16 20309 060701 1190.6106 MEETING EXPENSE 36.05 20309 060701 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1.00 20309 060701 1490.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 4.85 20309 060701 1490.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 15.00 20309 060701 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 10.00 20309 060701 1500.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 51.22 20309 060701 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 20.86 20309 060701 1627.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 30.00 20309 060701 1640.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 50.74 20309 060701 1641.6530 REPAIR PARTS 21.84 20309 060701 1643.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5.94 20309 060701 4075.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 26.86 20309 060701 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 10.17 20309 060701 5910.6235 POSTAGE 10.00 20309 060701 5913.6106 MEETING EXPENSE 3.75 20309 060701 1001.8060 CASH OVER AND UNDER 6/14/01 13:13:50 Page - 22 Business Unit GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET ADAPTIVE RECREATION TREES & MAINTENANCE CITY COUNCIL ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION PLANNING ASSESSING ENGINEERING GENERAL PUBLIC HEALTH PUBLIC HEALTH INSPECTIONS CONTINGENCIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL SPECIAL ACTIVITIES PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL MOWING GENERAL TURF CARE VANVALKENBURG MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GENERAL (BILLING) DISTRIBUTION GENERAL FUND REVENUES 481.84 222543 6114/01 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 5.00- 20217 3240094 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 3.15- 20218 3240059 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 4.13- 20219 3240093 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5.61- 20220 3240095 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 264.85 20380 727501 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 627.63 20381 727499 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 359.60 20382 727502 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 476.95 20383 727504 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 22.00 20384 727505 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 50.35 20385 727506 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Vendor Explanation CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/8/01 - 6/14/01 PO # Doc No Inv No 20386 727503 20387 727507 6/14/01 13:13:50 Page - 23 Account No Account Description Business Unit 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 222544 6/14101 102156 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING 42.40 20221 43272 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 568.13 20222 43247 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 186.80 20388 43533 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 698.25 20389 43535 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 15.90 DUM DUMS 20390 43534 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 505.00 20391 43468 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 186.96 20392 43530 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 220.93 20393 43501 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 31.56- 20394 43381 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,392.81 222545 6/14/01 103322. PINNACLE SIGNS & GRAPHICS INC. 112.28 SIGN CHANGES 20081 11136 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS POOL OPERATION 112.28 222546 6/14101 100956 PIPE SERVICES CORP 700.00 SANITARY SEWER TV INSPECTION 20082 2001023 5923.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS COLLECTION SYSTEMS 700.00 222547 6114/01 103256 POKORNY COMPANY 146.44 PLUMBING PARTS 20295 18670 5420.6530 REPAIR PARTS CLUB HOUSE 146.44 222548 6/14/01 101934 POSITIVE PROMOTIONS 301.28 SMOKING INFO 20445 060801 4083.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TOBACCO FREE GRANT 301.28 222549 6/14/01 100961 POSTMASTER 102.00 STAMPS 20083 060401 5410.6235 POSTAGE GOLF ADMINISTRATION 102.00 222550 6/14/01 100961 POSTMASTER 325.00 NEWSLETTER POSTAGE 20154 060501 1628.6235 POSTAGE SENIOR CITIZENS 325.00 222551 6/14/01 100380 PRESTRUD, BOB R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE Vendor Explanation 387753 5862.5513 63.00 VERNON SELLING 20225 SCHOOLBOOK 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 63.00 20226 387758 5822.5513 222552 6/14101 20227 101032 PRINT SHOP, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 20296 493.79 1550.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES NEWSLETTER 20296 060601 493.79 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 20296 222553 6/14/01 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 100966 PRINTERS SERVICE INC 970262 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 96.00 20232 970262 -00 BLADE SHARPENING TRADE DISCOUNTS 50TH STREET GENERAL 96.00 970004 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 222554 6/14/01 100968 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 677.41 267.58 1,826.25 169.73 1,153.20 4,094.17 222555 6/14/01 101877 PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY 542.10 BASIC LIFE 6 -1 -01 52.20 G. HUGHES 6-1 -01 13.65 COBRA 6 -1 -01 607.95 222556 6/14101 100970 QUALITY REFRIGERATION INC 353.70 ICE MACHINE REPAIRS 353.70 222557 6/14/01 100971 QUALITY WINE 3,211.92 31.70- 157.84 1.56- 2,797.54 55.49- 2,698.24 26.69- 1,210.20 24.03- 899.55 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/8/01 -6/14/01 PO # Doc No Inv No 20084 060401 6/14/01 13:13:50 Page - 24 Account No Account Description Business Unit 1640.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 20155 12982 1628.6575 PRINTING SENIOR CITIZENS 20338 17432 5521.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ARENA ICE MAINT 20223 387762 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 20224 387753 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 20225 387754 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 20226 387758 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 20227 386159 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 20296 060601 1550.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 20296 060601 1550.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 20296 060601 1550.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 20297 140506 5430.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 20228 970003 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 20228 970003 -00 5840.4408 TRADE DISCOUNTS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 20229 969945 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 20229 969945 -00 5840.4408 TRADE DISCOUNTS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 20230 970260 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 20230 970260 -00 5840.4408 TRADE DISCOUNTS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 20231 970041 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 20231 970041 -00 5860.4408 TRADE DISCOUNTS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 20232 970262 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 20232 970262 -00 5820.4408 TRADE DISCOUNTS 50TH STREET GENERAL 20233 970004 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING • CITY OF EDINA 6/14/01 13:13:50 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 25 6/8/01 - 6/14/01 Check # Date Amount Vendor Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Account Description Business Unit 8,90- 20233 970004 -00 5820.4408 TRADE DISCOUNTS 50TH STREET GENERAL 49.47 20395 970072 -00 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING .48- 20395 970072 -00 5860.4408 TRADE DISCOUNTS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 2,680.03 20396 970261 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 52,71- 20396 970261 -00 5860.4408 TRADE DISCOUNTS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 13,503.23 222558 6/14101 103930 QUIST, SUSAN 450.00 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 20463 060801 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 450.00 222559 6/14/01 100972 R &R SPECIALTIES INC 633.68 ICE PAINT & SUPPLIES 20085 00014819 5521.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ICE MAINT 160.71 SNOW TANK LID, BRACE KIT 20086 00014820 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 794.39 222560 6/14101 100973, RADIO SHACK 21.29 UNIVERSAL HOLDER 20087 090977 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 18.49 JUMPER & TEST LEADS 20088 091732 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 39.78 222561 6/14/01 104450 RAPID GRAPHICS & MAILING 184.25 PRINTING OF HOURS CARDS 20446 6693 5610.6575 PRINTING ED ADMINISTRATION 184.25 222562 6114/01 100897 RELIANT ENERGY - MINNEGASCO 446.92 20156 062201 1470.6186 HEAT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 118,98 20156 062201 1481.6186 HEAT YORK FIRE STATION 467.43 20156 062201 1551.6186 HEAT CITY HALL GENERAL 161.55 20156 062201 1552.6186 HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1,836.28 20156 062201 1646.6186 HEAT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 433.02 20156 062201 5111.6186 HEAT ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 20156 062201 5311.6186 HEAT POOL OPERATION 360.20 20156 062201 5420.6186 HEAT CLUB HOUSE 101.55 20156 062201 5422.6186 HEAT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 3,214.86 20156 062201 5210.6186 HEAT GOLF DOME PROGRAM 39.68 20156 062201 5430.6186 HEAT RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 6,571.71 20156 062201 5511.6186 HEAT ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 20156 062201 5620.6186 HEAT EDINBOROUGH PARK 441.02 20156 062201 5630.6186 HEAT CENTENNIAL LAKES 510.53 20156 062201 5911.6186 HEAT PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Vendor Explanation 2,073.08 9.59 222563 6/14101 104097 RICHARD KNUTSON CONSTRUCTION Council Check Register 28,592.24 Page - 26 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 28,592.24 PO # Doc No Inv No 222564 6/14/01 Business Unit 104704 RICHARDSON. RICHELLE 5913.6186 HEAT DISTRIBUTION 180.00 062201 5821.6186 EDINA ART FAIR 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 20156 180.00 5841.6186 HEAT YORK OCCUPANCY 222565 6/14/01 5861.6186 101210 RISK MANAGEMENT ALTERNATIVES 20447 061501 27.50 T258PAMELA PARK/LAKE STORM 20157 MAY LETTERS 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 27.50 20158 551877010050 1001.4329 222566 6/14/01 104411 ROBB, CINDY 20159 37.50 1001.4390 REGISTRATION FEES TENNIS LESSON REFUND 20089 31516 37.50 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE S 20160 222567 6/14/01 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK 101963 S & S TREE AND HORTICULTURAL S 15705 5913.6517 2,343.43 DISTRIBUTION 20090 PO 5749 1001.4390 REGISTRATION FEES 2,343.43 20298 202023 1301.6556 222568 6/14/01 100987 SA -AG INC 239.70 SAND FOR WATERBREAK 116.60 SAND FOR WATERBREAK 356.30 222569 6/14101 104692 SACKS, JULIA 48.00 PROGRAM REFUND 46.00 222570 6/14/01 100989 SCHAFER EQUIPMENT CO. 447.58 CONCRETE, BROOM 447.58 222571 6/14/01 100990 SCHARBER & SONS CITY OF EDINA 6/14101 13:13:50 Council Check Register Page - 26 6/8/01 — 6114101 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Account Description Business Unit 20156 062201 5913.6186 HEAT DISTRIBUTION 20156 062201 5821.6186 HEAT 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 20156 062201 5841.6186 HEAT YORK OCCUPANCY 20156 062201 5861.6186 HEAT VERNON OCCUPANCY 20447 061501 04258.1705.3000NTRACTOR PAYMENTS T258PAMELA PARK/LAKE STORM 20157 060301 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET REVOLVING 20158 551877010050 1001.4329 AMBULANCE FEES GENERAL FUND REVENUES 101 20159 060501 1001.4390 REGISTRATION FEES GENERAL FUND REVENUES 20089 31516 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE S 20160 15881 5913.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK DISTRIBUTION S 20161 15705 5913.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK DISTRIBUTION 20090 060501 1001.4390 REGISTRATION FEES GENERAL FUND REVENUES 20298 202023 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Vendor Explanation Council Check Register 71.22 BALL JOINT 6/8/01 -6114101 159.67 CITY DECALS, HOUSING PO # Doc No Inv No 230.89 Account Description Business Unit 222572 6/14101 1553.6530 104689 SERIGRAPHICS SIGN SYSTEMS INC. 20449 249934 60.28 REPAIR PARTS SIGNS 20091 32071 60.28 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 222573 6/14/01 1301.6556 101862 SEVEN CORNERS ACE HARDWARE INC 20450 061501 178.48 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS TOOL BELT, CHALK LINE 20451 061101 178.48 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 222574 6/14/01 5610.6136 104711 SHAFER CONTRACTING CO. INC. 20162 15568 65,531.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 20453 8022893 65,531.00 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 222575 6/14101 5842.5514 103249 SHANNON, JIM 20235 119876 100.00 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER PERFORMANCE JUNE 16 20236 119878 100.00 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX PERFORMANCE JUNE 19 20237 119877 200.00 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 222576 6114/01 5822.5514 100999 SIGNAL SYSTEMS INC. 20300 326664 81.20 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER TIME CARDS 20163 060301 81.20 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET REVOLVING 222577 6/14/01 103234 SOKKIA MEASURING SYSTEMS 16,19 PK NAILS 16.19 222578 6/14/01 101002 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS INC 65.00 65.00 118.10 2,854.20 37.40 89.10 3,228.80 222579 6/14/01 104702 SPEAR, TRAVAS 110.00 EDINA ART FAIR 110.00 CITY OF EDINA 6114/0't 13:13:50 Council Check Register Page - 27 6/8/01 -6114101 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Account Description Business Unit 20448 248036 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 20449 249934 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 20091 32071 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 20299 3333 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 20450 061501 01317.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS BA -317 TH169 FRONTAGE ROAD 20451 061101 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 20452 06/11 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 20162 15568 5510.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 20453 8022893 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 20234 119879 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 20235 119876 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 20236 119878 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 20237 119877 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 20238 119871 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 20300 326664 5430.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 20163 060301 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET REVOLVING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount REPAIR PARTS Vendor Explanation 222580 6/14/01 1553.6530 101021 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LLC 20094 053101 148.17 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL ACCT 0419133038 20340 05/31 148.17 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 222581 6/14/01 5842.6122 104709 SPORT SUPPLY GROUP INC. 20340 05/31 227.37 ADVERTISING OTHER BALLS, SCOOTERS PROPOSED SPECIAL ASSESS 20101 227.37 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 222582 6/14/01 20102 101004 SPS COMPANIES ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 13.54 HEX BUSHINGS, FITTINGS 13.54 222583 6/14/01 103277 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO INC 273.17 TOOTH 84.70 MASTER CYLINDER 357.87 222584 6/14/01 101007 STAR TRIBUNE 826.70 WANT AD 265.00 50TH & FRANCE GUIDE 132.50 50TH & FRANCE GUIDE 132.50 50TH & FRANCE GUIDE 1,356.70 222585 6/14101 101708 STATE OF MINNESOTA CPV PROGRAM 500.00 MEMBERSHIP FEE 500.00 222586 6/14/01 102262 STRATEGIC INSIGHTS COMPANY 1,065.00 LICENSE RENEWAL 222587 6114101 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 355.00 96.52 80.44 101.89 112.61 123.34 139.42 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/8101 - 6/14101 PO # Doc No Inv No 20092 052501 Account No Account Description 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 20339 90670502 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 6114/01 13:13:50 Page - 28 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EDINBOROUGH PARK 20093 3734714 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 20095 SI99263 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 20342 SI99382 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 20094 053101 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 20340 05/31 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 20340 05/31 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 20340 05/31 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 20341 060101 1553.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 20343 332235450001 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) ART FAIR AD 20096 421056 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING AD FOR BID 20097 419837 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION ALLEY IMPROVEMENT 20098 420915 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION AD FOR BID 20099 420914 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION VACATION OF EASEMENTS 20100 419838 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION PROPOSED SPECIAL ASSESS 20101 419841 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION PROPOSED SPECIAL ASSESS 20102 419840 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX CITY OF EDINA 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER Council Check Register 6/14/01 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 6/8/01 - 6/14/01 37.65 Check # Date Amount Vendor Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Account Description 28.60 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE 20344 423294 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 96.52 AD FOR BID 20345 423289 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 80.44 AD FOR BID 20346 423290 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 1,214.78 20456 229272 222588 6/14/01 101026 TARGET 3,689.45 37.38 TOTES, SOAP 20301 0768650 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 6/14/01 13:13:50 Page - 29 Business Unit ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION GRILL 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 37.38 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 222589 6/14/01 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 37.65 20397 228967 3,254.20 20398 228966 294.00 20455 195876 103.60 20456 229272 3,689.45 222590 6/14/01 103331 TILSNER, DONNA 500.00 PETTY CASH - PLAYGROUNDS 20454 060701 500.00 222591 6/14/01 103366 TIME WARNER CABLE 283.84 CABLE TV AD 20302 23087 283.83 CABLE TV AD 20302 23087 283.83 CABLE TV AD 20302 23087 333.00 TV CABLE AD 20347 23088 333.00 TV CABLE AD 20347 23088 333.00 TV CABLE AD 20347 23088 1,850.50 222592 6/14/01 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 72.55 WEDLING GASES 20348 452405 191.70 LEASE RENEWAL - WELDING SUPPLIES 20457 705711 264.25 222593 6/14/01 101706 TRACYITRIPP FUELS 437.35 GASOLINE 20103 82840 928.22 GAS & DIESEL 20303 82933 1,365.57 222594 6/14/01 101042 TRIARCO ARTS & CRAFTS 495.97 ART SUPPLIES 20458 396926 6/14/01 13:13:50 Page - 29 Business Unit ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION GRILL 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 5421.5514. COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES 5422.6556 TOOLS 5422.6581 GASOLINE 5422.6581 GASOLINE 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 50TH ST SELLING, YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS PLAYGROUND & THEATER R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/8/01 -6/14/01 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Account Description 20104 0083970 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS Check # -- Date Amount 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO. Vendor Explanation 20350 FLIGHT 495.97 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 222595 6/14/01 1419.6203 102175 TRUCK UTILITIES MFG CO 20459 053101 43.50 6/14/01 D -RINGS 100363 U S BANCORP 43.50 222596 6/14/01 103121 TURTLE BAY BUILDING SERVICE IN 229.00 985.13 JUNE CLEANING 222601 6/14101 985.13 102513 U.S. FILTER CORPORATION 222597 6/14/01 101047 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO 96.72 CLUTCH DISC & SPRINGS 96.72 222602 6/14/01 222598 6/14101 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 101172 TWIN CITY SAW CO. 3,963.26 516.40 LOOP TRIMMER, BLADE 118.14 CHAINS UNIFORMS 133.39 39.50 FACE SHEILD & EAR MUFFS UNIFORMS 76.59 FILE, OIL MIX, GLOVES 222599 6/14101 5422.6541 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO. MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 20350 FLIGHT 209.81 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL SEED 053101 1419.6203 209.81 RESERVE PROGRAM 20459 053101 222600 6/14/01 GRILL 100363 U S BANCORP 229.00 ACCT 4833496005451658 229.00 222601 6/14101 102513 U.S. FILTER CORPORATION 601.02 601.02 222602 6/14/01 101051 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 3,963.26 UNIFORMS 433.15 UNIFORMS 39.50 UNIFORMS 4,435.91 222603 6/14/01 101908 US FOODSERVICE INC 4,570.32 FOOD 20349 855 20304 123054 20105 A4307 20106 A4305 20107 A4335 20108 A4308 6/14101 13:13:50 Page - 30 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5620.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINBOROUGH PARK 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1644.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING GENERAL MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING TREES & MAINTENANCE 20109 4208 5422.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 20350 FLIGHT 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 20110 0829760 5521.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ICE MAINT 20466 053101 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 20466 053101 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 20466 053101 1419.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE RESERVE PROGRAM 20459 053101 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL • R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 618/01 -6/14/01 Check # Date Amount Vendor Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Account Description BRAEMAR 1,860.85 TABLES, PAPER GOODS 20459 053101 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BRAEMAR 6/14/01 13:13:50 Page - 31 GRILL 20111 PO 1035 1646.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 20112 372537 5822.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 20305 373613 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 20460 374019 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 20461 16675 6,431.17 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 222605 6/14/01 5423.6216 102909 VADNAIS, SCOTT GOLF CARS 20117 93092FOW 765.00 REPAIR REPLACE DOOR AT LEWIS PK 20462 93566FOW 765.00 REPAIR PARTS 222606 6/14/01 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 141.11 BAGS 798.75 TISSUE, CAN LINERS 23.96 CAN LINERS 963.82 222607 6/14/01 101060 VANTAGE ELECTRIC 60.00 FAN REPLACEMENT 60.00 222608 6/14/01 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 480.00 CART RENTAL 480.00 222609 6/14/01 101064 VESSCO INC. 121.45 TAILWAY, NOZZLE 121.45 222610 6/14/01 101067 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER 109.59 SAFETY GLASSES, REPELLENT 109.59 222611 6/14/01 102886 WAGNER GREENHOUSES INC. 225.41 FLOWERS 225.41 222612 6/14101 101223 WALSER FORD 95.68 SHOCKS 32.84 LINK SET 102.38 WHEEL ASSEMBLY, NUTS 291.64 COIL & BOOT ASSEMBLY 522.54 6/14/01 13:13:50 Page - 31 GRILL 20111 PO 1035 1646.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 20112 372537 5822.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 20305 373613 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 20460 374019 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 20461 16675 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 20113 8624 5423.6216 LEASE LINES GOLF CARS 20165 24028 1643.6556 TOOLS GENERAL TURF CARE 20166 85195 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 20351 56R2001 5620.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH PARK 20115 93377FOW 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 20116 93279FOW 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 20117 93092FOW 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 20462 93566FOW 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6114/01 13:13:50 Council Check Register Page - 32 6/8/01 -6/14/01 Check # Date Amount Vendor Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Account Description Business Unit 222613 6114/01 103466 WASTE MANAGEMENT - SAVAGE MN 3,108.40 REFUSE 20306 1226413 -2282 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH -3 222619 6/14101 101089 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 197.20 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 86.23 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 44.30 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 327.73 1,067,278.14 Grand Total 20307 39774 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 20118 542937 4075.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANVALKENBURG 20239 060601 20240 060600 20241 060602 20242 13006 20399 43637 20400 43635 20243 106774 20244 106773 20401 106839 20402 106872 20119 54165279 20120 54067597 20308 54067387 Payment Instrument Totals Total 1,067,278.14 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 3,108.40 5862.5513 222614 6/14/01 5822.5513 101077 WEST WELD SUPPLY CO. 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5513 137.07 DRILL BITS, TAPS 137.07 222615 6/14/01 100304 WESTLUND PROVISIONS INC. 213.36 FOOD FOR VAN VALKENBURG 213.36 222616 6/14101 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 905.20 359.00 460.75 1,724.95 222617 6/14/01 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 47.32- 1,576.75 436.25 1,965.68 222618 6/14/01 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 447.00 105.00 533.00 222619 6/14101 101089 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 197.20 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 86.23 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 44.30 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 327.73 1,067,278.14 Grand Total 20307 39774 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 20118 542937 4075.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANVALKENBURG 20239 060601 20240 060600 20241 060602 20242 13006 20399 43637 20400 43635 20243 106774 20244 106773 20401 106839 20402 106872 20119 54165279 20120 54067597 20308 54067387 Payment Instrument Totals Total 1,067,278.14 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5431.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 5922.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SEWER TREATMENT 5210.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GOLF DOME PROGRAM • R55CKSUM LOG20000 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 188,954.22 02100 CDBG FUND 37.00 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 15.04 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 11,518.20 04800 CONSTRUCTION FUND 87,977.90 05100 ART CENTER FUND 921.79 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 3,381.10 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 23,849.53 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 33,634.49 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 8,829.42 05600 EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND 8,964.74 05800 LIQUOR FUND 103,731.92 05900 UTILITY FUND 235,157.09 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 30,687.20 05950 RECYCLING FUND 29,618.50 09900 PAYROLL FUND 300,000.00 Report Totals 1,067,278.14 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Summary 6/8/01 - 6/14/01 We confirm to the best of our knowkdp and belief, that these daims comply in all materiel respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing pol icies and procedures a;e � 0 in �� City Manager 6/14/01 13:20:50 Page - 1 o WLe M)Icn � To: -Mayor & City Council From: John Wallin Finance Director Date: June 19, 2001 Subject: Receive 2000 CAFR REPORT /RECOMMENDATION Agenda Item # X.B. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ® Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Recommend receipt of 2000 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR). Info /Background: Attached is the following: Independent Auditors' Communications Letter Independent Auditor's Report on Minnesota Legal Compliance 2000 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. The Independent Auditor's Report on Minnesota Legal Compliance is the result of the extensive audit performed to assure compliance with all of the State's statutes. The auditors one finding and management's response is included. The Independent Auditors' Communication Letter is an informational letter which discusses their responsibilities. The 2000 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report is the accumulation of all Finance functions compiled in a format prescribed by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, 0 the Governmental Accounting Standards Board, The State of Minnesota, and The Federal Government. The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report consists of a number of sections: The Introductory Section has a listing of elected and appointed officials and letters from the City Manager and Finance Director. The Financial Section General Purpose Statements includes the Auditors' Opinion, Combined Balance Sheet and Combined Statements of Revenue Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance, and the Notes to the Financial Statements which describe accounting policies, Balance Sheet accounts, and other details as required by the above mentioned boards and governments. The Financial Section Combining and Individual Funds and Account Group Statements are the part of the report that details the 2000 accounting for the City, broken down by fund type. The Financial Section Supplementary Schedules include various schedules of bonded indebtedness, and Auditor's Reports on Federal and State compliance. The Statistical Section has a number of schedules again required by the above mentioned boards and governments. The auditors will often issue a Management Letter which is a letter of comments and recommendations on what the auditors view as deficiencies and their recommendations for improvements. This year the auditors found no deficiencies which warranted a Management Letter. 4200 Wells Fargo Center 90 South Seventh Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 March - 30, 2001 The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Edina, Minnesota Telephone 612 305 5000 Fax 612 305 5100 We have audited the general purpose financial statements of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City) for the year ended December 31, 2000, and have issued our report thereon dated March 30, 2001. Under auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, we are providing you with the attached information related to the conduct of our audit. Our Responsibility Under Generally Accepted Auditing Standards We have a responsibility to conduct our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. In carrying out this responsibility, we planned and performed the audit to obtain reasonable assurance abouth whether the general purpose financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether caused by error or fraud. Because of the nature of audit evidence and the characteristics of fraud, we are to obtain reasonable, not absolute, assurance that material misstatements are detected. We have no responsibility to plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance that misstatements, whether caused by error or fraud, that are not material to the financial statements are detected. In addition, in planning and performing our audit, we considered internal control in order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial statements. An audit does not include examining the effectiveness of internal control and does not provide assurance on internal control. Significant Accounting Policies The significant accounting policies used by the City are described in the notes to the general purpose financial statements. No new accounting policies were adopted and the application of existing policies was not changed during the fiscal year. We noted no transactions entered into by the City during the year that were both significant and unusual, and of which, under professional standards, we are required to inform you, or transactions for which there is a lack of authoritative guidance or consensus. KPMG LLP. KPMG LLP, a U.S. limited liability partnership, is a member of KPMG International, a Swiss association. ►�rary Management Judgments and Accounting Estimates Accounting estimates are an integral part of the financial statements prepared by management and are based upon management's current judgments. Certain accounting estimates are particularly sensitive because of their significance to the general purpose financial statements and because of the possibility that future events affecting them may differ markedly from management's current judgments. We evaluated the key factors and assumptions used to ascertain that they are reasonable in relation to the general purpose financial statements of the the City taken as a whole. Significant Audit Adjustments We proposed no adjustments arising from the audit that could, in our judgment, either individually or in the aggregate, have a significant quantitive or qualitative effect on the City's financial reporting process. Disagreements with Management There were no disagreements with management on financial accounting and reporting matters that, if not satisfactorily resolved, would have caused a modification of our report on the City's general purpose financial statements. Consultation with Other Accountants To the best of our knowledge management has not consulted with or obtained opinions, written or oral, from other independent accountants during the past year that were subject to the requirements of Statement of Auditing Standards No. 50, Reports on the Application of Accounting Principles. Major Issues Discussed with Management Prior to Retention We generally discuss a variety of matters, including the application of accounting principles and auditing standards, with management each year prior to retention as the City's auditors. However, these discussions occurred in the normal course of our professional relationship and our responses were not a condition to our retention. Difficulties Encountered in Performing the Audit We encountered no difficulties in dealing with management in performing our audit. This report is intended solely for the information and use of the City Council and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties. Very truly yours, �MC, LL-p A11!1 4200 Wells Fargo Center 90 South Seventh Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 Independent Auditors' Report The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Edina, Minnesota: We have audited the general purpose financial statements of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2000, and have issued our report thereon dated March 30, 2001. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America and the provisions of the Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Local Government, promulgated by the Legal Compliance Task Force pursuant to Minnesota Statutes § 6.65. Accordingly, the audit included such tests of the accounting records and such other auditing procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. The Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Local Government covers five main categories of compliance to be tested: contracting and bidding, deposits and investments, conflicts of interest, public indebtedness, and claims and disbursements. Our study included all of the listed categories. In connection with our audit, nothing came to our attention, insofar as they relate to accounting matters, that caused us to believe that the City failed to comply with the material terms and conditions of applicable legal provisions, except as described in the accompanying Schedule of Findings. However, our audit was not directed primarily toward obtaining knowledge of such noncompliance. This report is intended solely for the information and use of the City and the Office of the State Auditor and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties. March 30, 2001 K'PMC, LLB �..KPMG LLP. KPMG LLP a U.S. limited liability partnership, is a member of KPMG International, a Swiss association. CITY OF EDINA Edina, Minnesota Schedule of Findings Year ended December 31, 2000 COLLATERALIZED DEPOSITS Finding Exhibit Minnesota Statutes Section 118A.03, Subd. 1, states that to the extent funds deposited are in excess of available federal depository insurance, governmental entities shall require the financial institution to furnish collateral security or a corporate surety bond. During our review of depository balances and collateral, we noted the City did not have sufficient collateral at one of its depository financial institutions, Excel Bank, as of December 31, 2000. The uncollateralized balance was approximately $4,000. Recommendation The City of Edina should take the necessary steps to assure that all deposits have sufficient collateral. Management Response The bank balances and the required amount of collateral will be monitored more closely in the future. a �+ I H X888 DP FROM 5 I GNAMgER CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA 2000 COMPREHENSIVE ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Year ended December 31, 2000 Department of Finance John Wallin— Treasurer and Finance Director Peggy Gibbs — Assistant Finance Director Paula Nelson— Accountant CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PART I -- INTRODUCTORY SECTION Elected and Appointed Officials .................................................................. ............................... 1 Lettersof Transmittal .................................................................................. ............................... 2 PART II — FINANCIAL SECTION IndependentAuditors' Report ...................................................................... ..............................9 General Purpose Financial Statements: Combined Balance Sheet — All Fund Types and Account Groups ........ ............................... 11 Combined Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance — All Governmental Fund Types .................................. ............................... 13 Combined Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance — Budget and Actual — General and Special Revenue Fund Types.......... 15 Combined Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings — All Proprietary Fund Types ................................. .............................17 Combined Statement of Cash Flows — All Proprietary Fund Types ...... ............................... 18 Notes to General Purpose Financial Statements ................................... ............................... 19 Combining and Individual Fund and Account Group Financial Statements: General Fund: BalanceSheet ...................................................................................... ............................... 45 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance — Budget and Actual ................................................. ............................... 46 Schedule of Revenues — Budget and Actual ...................................... ............................... 47 Schedule of Expenditures — Budget and Actual ................................. ............................... 48 Schedule of Central Services Expenditures — Budget and Actual ..... ............................... 53 Special Revenue Funds: CombiningBalance Sheet ........................................................ ............................... Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in FundBalance ......................................................................... ............................... Debt Service Funds: CombiningBalance Sheet ................................................. ............................... Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in FundBalance .................................................................. ............................... ....... 55 ....... 56 ....... 58 .............. 59 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Table of Contents, Continued Page Combining and Individual Fund and Account Group Financial Statements (Continued): Capital Project Funds: Combining Balance Sheet .............................................................. ..................................... 61 Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in FundBalance ( Deficit) ...................................................................... ............................... 62 Enterprise Funds: CombiningBalance Sheet ................................................................... ............................... 64 Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings ...... 66 Combining Statement of Cash Flows .................................................. ............................... 68 Utilities Fund: BalanceSheet ............................................................................... ............................... 70 Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings .................... 71 Statement of Cash Flows .............................................................. ............................... 72 Liquor Fund: BalanceSheet ............................................................................... ............................... 73 Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings .................... 74 Statement of Cash Flows .............................................................. ............................... 75 Schedule of Operating Revenue and Expenses by Location ....... ............................... 76 Swimming Pool Fund: BalanceSheet ............................................................................... ............................... 77 Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings (Deficit) ...... 78 Statement of Cash Flows .............................................................. ............................... 79 Golf Course Fund: BalanceSheet ............................................................................... ............................... 80 Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings .................... 81 Statement of Cash Flows .............................................................. ............................... 82 Schedule of Operating Expenses .................................................. ............................... 83 Arena Fund: BalanceSheet ............................................................................... ............................... 84 Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings (Deficit) ...... 85 Statement of Cash Flows .............................................................. ............................... 86 Art Center Fund: BalanceSheet ............................................................................... ............................... 87 Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings .................... 88 Statement of Cash Flows .............................................................. ............................... 89 Edinborough Park/Centennial Lake Fund: BalanceSheet ............................................................................... ............................... 90 Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings ................... 91 Statement of Cash Flows .............................................................. ............................... 92 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Table of Contents, Continued Trust and Agency Funds: Page CombiningBalance Sheet ............................................................... ............................... 94 Deferred Compensation Expendable Trust Fund: BalanceSheet ............................................................ ............................... 95 Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings .................. 96 Agency Funds: Combining Statement of Changes in Assets and Liabilities ........ ............................... 97 General Fixed Assets Account Group: Schedule of General Fixed Assets .................................... :............................................... 99 General Long -term Debt Account Group: Schedule of General Long -term Debt ..................... ............................... ............................101 Supplementary Information: Page ................ Table 1 ..... ............................111 Exhibit Page Combined Schedule of Bonded Indebtedness . ........................Exhibit 1 .... ............................102 Schedule of Changes in Bonded Indebtedness .......................Exhibit 2 .... ............................104 Schedule of Bonds Payable .............................. ........................Exhibit 3 . ............................... 105 Schedule of Debt Service Requirements ......... ........................Exhibit 4 . ............................... 109 Assessed Valuation, Tax Levies and Mill Rates ......................Exhibit 5 .... ............................110 PART III — STATISTICAL SECTION General Governmental Expenditures by Function Last Ten Fiscal Years ......... ............................... General Governmental Revenues by Source Last Ten Fiscal Years ......... ............................... Property tax Levies and Collections — Last Ten FiscalYears ........................ ............................... Table Page ................ Table 1 ..... ............................111 ................ Table 2 .. ............................... 112 ................ Table 3 .. ............................... 113 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Table of Contents, Continued Assessed Value or Tax Capacity and Estimated Market Value of Taxable Property .......... ............................... Property Tax Rates — All Overlapping Governments Last Ten Fiscal Years ............................................................. Special Assessment Collections — Last Ten FiscalYears ............................................ ............................... Ratio of Net General Bonded Debt to Assessed Value/Tax Capacity and Net Bonded Debt per Capita — Last Ten Fiscal Years .............. ............................... Computation of Overlapping Debt - December 31, 2000......... Ratio of Annual Debt Service Expenditures for General Bonded Debt to Total General Expenditures — Last Ten Fiscal Years .. ............................... Revenue Bond Coverage — Last Ten Fiscal Years ................. Property and Construction Values — Last Ten FiscalYears ........................................... ............................... Principal Taxpayers - December 31, 2000 .............................. Major Employers in the City ...................... ............................... LaborForce Data ...................................... ............................... Miscellaneous Statistics - December 31, 2000 ....................... Schedule of Sources and Uses of Public Funds for 50th & France -No. 1200, a Tax Increment Financing District ................................ ............................... Schedule of Sources and Uses of Public Funds for Southeast Edina Redevelopment District - No. 1201, a Tax Increment Financing District ................... Schedule of Sources and Uses of Public Funds for Grandview Area Redevelopment District - No. 1202, a Tax Increment Financing District ................... Schedule of Sources and Uses of Public Funds for Southeast Edina Redevelopment District - No. 1203, a Tax Increment Financing District ................... Schedule of Sources and Uses of Public Funds for 70th Street and Cahill Road District -No. 1207, a Tax Increment Financing District .......................... Table 4 .. .... ............................114 Table 5 ..... ............................115 Table 6 ..... ............................116 Table 7 ..... ............................117 Table 8 ..... ............................118 Table 9 ..... ............................ 119 Table 10 . ............................... 120 Table 11 .... ............................121 Table 12 .... ............................122 Table 13 .... ............................123 Table 14 .... ............................124 Table 15 .... ............................125 Table 16 127 Table 17 .... ............................128 Table 18 .... ............................129 Table 19 . ............................... 130 Table 20 . ............................... 131 .INTRODUCTORY SECTION CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Elected and Appointed Officials December 31, 2000 Elected: Mayor — Dennis Maetzold Page 1 Term of office expires January* t�KIi Council: James Hovland 2003 Scot Housh 2003 Michael Kelly 2005 Linda Masica 2005 Appointed: Manager - Gordon Hughes Treasurer and Finance Director -John Wallin Assistant Finance Director -Peggy Gibbs Clerk -Debra Mangen *First Official business day. Page 2 City of Edina March 30, 2001 To the Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Edina, .Minnesota: In accordance with State Statutes and local charter provision, I hereby transmit the annual financial report of the City of Edina, Minnesota as of December 31, 2000 and for the fiscal year then ended. Responsibility for both the accuracy of the presented data and the completeness and fairness of the presentation, including all disclosures, rests with the City. All disclosures necessary to enable the reader to gain the maximum understanding of the City's financial affairs have been included. In developing and evaluating the City's accounting system, consideration is given to the adequacy of internal accounting controls. Internal accounting controls are discussed by the Finance Director in his accompanying letter of transmittal, and within that framework, I believe that the City's internal accounting controls adequately safeguard assets and provide reasonable assurance of proper recording of financial transactions. In accordance with the above- mentioned guidelines the accompanying report consists of three sections: 1) Introductory section - includes the Finance Director's letter of transmittal; 2) Financial section - includes the financial statements and supplemental schedules of the government accompanied by our independent auditors' reports; and 3) Statistical section- includes a number of tables of unaudited data depicting the financial history of the government for the past ten years, information on overlapping governments, and demographic and other miscellaneous information. State law requires that the financial statements of the City of Edina, Minnesota be audited by a certified public accountant selected by the City Council. This requirement has been complied with, and our independent auditors' reports are included in the financial section of this report. City Hall (952) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (952) 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (952) 826 -0379 Page 3 The City of Edina, Minnesota concluded fiscal year 2000 in a sound financial condition, which is shown in the report. Preparation of this annual financial report could not have been accomplished without the dedicated effort of the Finance Director and his entire staff. Their efforts over the past years toward upgrading the accounting and financial reporting systems of the City of Edina have lead substantially to the improved quality of the information being reported to the City Council, state oversight boards, and the citizens of the City of Edina. Respectfully submitted, Ig ordon Hughes City Manager March 30, 2001 To the Honorable Mayor, Members of the City Council, and City Manager City of Edina, Minnesota: Page 4 City of Edina The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report of the City of Edina (the City), for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000, is submitted herewith. This report was prepared by the City's Finance Department. Responsibility for both the accuracy of the presented data and the completeness and fairness of the presentation, including all disclosures, rests with the City. We believe the data, as presented, is accurate in all material respects; that it is presented in a manner designed to fairly set forth the financial position and results of operations of the City as measured by the financial activity of its various funds; and that all disclosures necessary to enable the reader to gain the maximum understanding of the City's financial affairs have been included. Accounting System and Budgetary Control In developing and evaluating the City's accounting system, consideration is given to the adequacy of internal accounting controls. Internal accounting controls are designed to provide reasonable, but not absolute, assurance regarding: (1) the safeguarding of assets against loss from unauthorized use or disposition; and (2) the reliability of financial records for preparing financial statements and maintaining accountability for assets. The concept of reasonable assurance recognizes that: (1) the cost of a control should not exceed the benefits likely to be derived; and (2) the evaluation of costs and benefits requires estimates and judgments by management. All internal control evaluations occur within the above framework. We believe that the City's internal accounting controls adequately safeguard assets and provide reasonable assurance of proper recording of financial transactions. Budgetary control is maintained through the issuance of purchase orders. Purchase orders which would result in an overrun of the budgeted allotment are not released until additional appropriations are made available. City Hall (952) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (952) 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (952) 826 -0379 Page 5 The Reporting Entity and Its Services The City has reviewed its reporting entity definition in accordance with Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement 14. The entities included in the City's report are those for which the City is financially accountable and which the City's relationship with is such that exclusion would cause the City's financial statements to be misleading or incomplete. The City provides the full range of municipal services. These services include police and fire protection, civil defense, public health, animal control, inspections, public works maintenance, public improvements, parks and recreation activities, and general administrative services. SIGNIFICANT EVENTS AND ACCOMPLISHMENTS General Governmental Functions Revenues for general governmental functions reported within the General, Special Revenue, Debt Service and Capital Project Funds totaled $35,617,256 in 2000, an increase of 9.1 percent over 1999. General property taxes produced 64.3 percent of general revenues compared to 65.1 percent last year. The amount of revenues from various sources and the increase (decrease) over last year are shown in the following table: Revenue Source Taxes Special assessments Franchise fee Licenses and permits Intergovernmental Charges for services Fines and forfeitures Investment income Interest on funds held with fiscal agent Sale and rental of property Other revenues Total revenues Total $22,904,512 1,159,876 336,678 1,83,5,828 1,880,680 2,902,666 967,421 2,287,349 88,788 1,156,526 96,932 .27% (381,856) $35,617,256 100.00% $2,970,108 Current tax collections were 99.3 percent of the tax levy, up .34 percent from last year. Delinquent tax collections were up from last year. The ratio of total collections (current and delinquent) to the current tax levy was 99.4 percent, an increase of .17 percent from last year. Intergovernmental revenues were 5.3% of general revenues compared to 9.4% in 1999. There was a $1 million sale of land in 2000. Investment income increased compared with 1999 due to unrealized losses in 1999 compared to unrealized gains in 2000. Increase Percent (decrease) of total from 1999 64.30% $ 909,282 3.26% 169,546 .95% 38,812 5.15% .(299,713) .5.28% (1,304,328) 8.15% 832,190 2.72% 172,711 6.42% 1,872,235 .25% 88,788 3.25% 872,441 96,932 .27% (381,856) $35,617,256 100.00% $2,970,108 Current tax collections were 99.3 percent of the tax levy, up .34 percent from last year. Delinquent tax collections were up from last year. The ratio of total collections (current and delinquent) to the current tax levy was 99.4 percent, an increase of .17 percent from last year. Intergovernmental revenues were 5.3% of general revenues compared to 9.4% in 1999. There was a $1 million sale of land in 2000. Investment income increased compared with 1999 due to unrealized losses in 1999 compared to unrealized gains in 2000. Page 6 Expenditures for general govemmental purposes within the General, Special Revenue, Debt Service and Capital Project Funds totaled $34,238,524 an increase of 12.1 percent over 1999. Increases (decreases) in levels of expenditures for major functions of the City over last year are shown in the following table: Function General government Public safety Public works Parks Unallocated general Other Capital outlay Bond principal Interest and fiscal charges Total expenditures Debt Administration The ratio of net bonded debt to tax capacity and the amount of bonded debt per capita are useful indicators of the City's debt position and are listed below: Ratio of net bonded debt to tax capacity Net bonded debt per capital The following is a summary of bonded debt for fiscal year 2000: Gross bonded debt outstanding, January 1, 2000 Add bonds issued in fiscal year 2000 Deduct bonds redeemed in fiscal year 2000 Gross bonded debt outstanding, December 31, 2000 Deduct sinking fund assets, December 31, 2000 Net bonded debt, December 31, 2000 .8126 $ 1.434 $73,005,000 22,005,000 6,835,000 88,175,000 (20,144,460) $68,030,540 The City's bonds were upgraded to an Aaa rating as determined by Moody's Investors Service, and an AA+ rating from Standard & Poors in August, 2000. At December 31, 2000 the City had $66,670,000 of Tax Increment Bonds outstanding, excluding General Obligation, Improvement and Revenue Bonds. $16,550,464 was available in the General Debt Service Fund for payment of these obligations, resulting in $50,119,536 net general debt at December 31, 2000 Increase Percent (decrease) Total of total from 1999 $2,635,357 7.7% $ 107,810 8,846,360 25.8% 329,687 3,672,057 10.7% (72,067) 2,150,588 6.3% (90,142) 346,099 1.0% (20,233) 1,576,968 4.6% 571,187 8,352,494 24.4% 2,752,858 3,550,000 10.4% 275,000 3,.108,601 9.1% (153,665) $34,238,524 100.0% $ 3,700,435 Debt Administration The ratio of net bonded debt to tax capacity and the amount of bonded debt per capita are useful indicators of the City's debt position and are listed below: Ratio of net bonded debt to tax capacity Net bonded debt per capital The following is a summary of bonded debt for fiscal year 2000: Gross bonded debt outstanding, January 1, 2000 Add bonds issued in fiscal year 2000 Deduct bonds redeemed in fiscal year 2000 Gross bonded debt outstanding, December 31, 2000 Deduct sinking fund assets, December 31, 2000 Net bonded debt, December 31, 2000 .8126 $ 1.434 $73,005,000 22,005,000 6,835,000 88,175,000 (20,144,460) $68,030,540 The City's bonds were upgraded to an Aaa rating as determined by Moody's Investors Service, and an AA+ rating from Standard & Poors in August, 2000. At December 31, 2000 the City had $66,670,000 of Tax Increment Bonds outstanding, excluding General Obligation, Improvement and Revenue Bonds. $16,550,464 was available in the General Debt Service Fund for payment of these obligations, resulting in $50,119,536 net general debt at December 31, 2000 Page 7 Cash Management The City subscribes to the "pooled cash" concept of investing which means that all funds with cash balances participate in an investment pool. This permits some funds to be overdrawn and others to show cash balances when in fact, the City has a cash balance. This pooled cash concept provides for investing greater amounts of money at more favorable rates. Interest earnings are then periodically allocated to the participating funds. During 2000, the City earned $2,906,622 in investment income. The following is a list of the City's cash and investments by classification as of December 31, 2000: Cash Cash deficit Cash with plan administrator Cash with fiscal agents Certificates of deposit Commercial paper Banker's acceptance Government securities Money market investments Capital Project Funds $2,781,386 (2,446,861) 3,999,778 19,013,091 1,052,002 21,823,657 883,009 15,534,373 5,813,116 $68,453,551 The major construction projects and equipment purchases are accounted for in four Capital Project Funds. The HRA Fund accounts for construction projects within the City's seven tax increment districts. The Construction Fund and Revolving Fund are for construction projects or 'major equipment purchases funded through special assessments, State aids, General Fund appropriations, or working capital funds. General Fixed Assets The general fixed assets of the City are those fixed assets used in the performance of general governmental functions and exclude the fixed assets of the Enterprise Funds. As of December 31, 2000, the general fixed assets of the City amounted to $90,961,462. This amount represents the original cost of the assets and is considerably less than their present value. Depreciation of general fixed assets is not recognized in the City's accounting system. Page 8 Enterprise Funds The City currently operates eight Enterprise Funds which are set up to operate primarily from user fees charged to the general public. A comparative statement of income (loss) before operating transfers for the fiscal years ended 2000 and 1999 is as follows: Income (loss) 1999 $1,767,425 945,546 56,202 544,306 (183,441) (153,006) (356,487) $1,948,510 $2,620,545 Operating transfers to /from other funds for various purposes were $220,000 to other enterprise funds, $108,000 to the general fund and $919,000 to the revolving fund in 2000 and $715,000, $23,000 and $0 in 1999, respectively. Independent Audit Minnesota State Statutes require that every city with a population of more than 2,500 submit to the State Auditor audited financial statements which have been attested to by a certified public accountant, public accountant or the State Auditor. This Statute has been complied with, and the independent auditors' report of the certified public accounting firm of KPMG LLP has been included in this Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for 2000. Acknowledgments The preparation of this report on a timely basis could not be accomplished without the efficient and dedicated services of the entire staff of the Finance Department. We would like to express our appreciation to all members of the Department who assisted and contributed to its preparation. We should also like to thank the Mayor and City Council members for their interest and support in planning and conducting the financial operations of the City in a responsible and progressive manner. Respectfully submitted, ohn Wallin, CPA Treasurer and Finance Director P .ALA Peg % bs Assistant Finance Director 2000 Utilities $1,561,307 Liquor 961,133 Swimming pool 47,346 Golf course 259,357 Arena (289,177) Art Center (263,526) Edinborough Park/Centennial Lake (327,930) 1999 $1,767,425 945,546 56,202 544,306 (183,441) (153,006) (356,487) $1,948,510 $2,620,545 Operating transfers to /from other funds for various purposes were $220,000 to other enterprise funds, $108,000 to the general fund and $919,000 to the revolving fund in 2000 and $715,000, $23,000 and $0 in 1999, respectively. Independent Audit Minnesota State Statutes require that every city with a population of more than 2,500 submit to the State Auditor audited financial statements which have been attested to by a certified public accountant, public accountant or the State Auditor. This Statute has been complied with, and the independent auditors' report of the certified public accounting firm of KPMG LLP has been included in this Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for 2000. Acknowledgments The preparation of this report on a timely basis could not be accomplished without the efficient and dedicated services of the entire staff of the Finance Department. We would like to express our appreciation to all members of the Department who assisted and contributed to its preparation. We should also like to thank the Mayor and City Council members for their interest and support in planning and conducting the financial operations of the City in a responsible and progressive manner. Respectfully submitted, ohn Wallin, CPA Treasurer and Finance Director P .ALA Peg % bs Assistant Finance Director FINANCIAL SECTION= .Gene�aL Purpose'_Statements,' ; RA 4200 Wells Fargo Center 90 South Seventh Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 Independent Auditors' Report The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Edina, Minnesota We have audited the general - purpose financial statements of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City), as of and for the year ended December 31, 2000, as listed in the accompanying table of contents. These general - purpose financial statements are the responsibility of the City's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the general - purpose financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the general - purpose financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the general - purpose financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the City as of December 31, 2000, and the results of its operations and cash flows of its proprietary fund types for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Our audit was made for the purpose of forming an opinion on the general - purpose financial statements taken as a whole. The combining, individual fund, and account group financial statements and schedules in the accompanying table of contents are presented for purposes of additional analysis and are not a required part of the general - purpose financial statements of the City. Such information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the general - purpose financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the general - purpose financial statements taken as a whole. we e„ KPMG LLP KPMG LLP a U.S. limited liability partnership, is a member of KPMG International, a Swiss association, KPM(i The data designated as the statistical section and supplementary information listed in the accompanying table of contents is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the general - purpose financial statements. Such information has not been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the general - purpose financial statements and, accordingly, we express no opinion on it. March 30, 2001 K�MG, LLB 10 Page 11 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Combined Balance Sheet - All Fund Types and Account Groups December 31, 2000 (with comparative totals for December 31, 1999) Assets and Other Debits Cash (note 2) Petty cash and change funds (note 2) Investments (note 2) Cash and investments with plan administrators (notes 2 and 7) Cash and investments with fiscal agents (note 2) Receivables: Accounts Customers Accrued interest Special assessments Taxes Due from other funds (note 9) Due from other governments Inventory Prepaid Expenses Advance to other funds Fixed Assets (note 4) Discount on bonds Amount available in debt service fund Amount to be provided for retirement of long -tern debt Amount to be provided for compensated absences Total assets and other debits Liabilities, Fund Equity and Other Credits Liabilities: Accounts payable Salaries payable Contracts payable Accrued interest payable Due to other funds (note 9) Due to other governments Compensated absences payable Deposits payable Taxes payable Deferred revenue (note 3) Advance from other funds Obligation under capital lease (note 14) Bonds payable (note 5) Total liabilities Fund equity and other credits: Investment in general fixed assets (note 4) Contributed Capital (note 16) Retained earnings: Reserved (note 11) Unreserved - undesignated Fund balance: Reserved (note 11) Unreserved - designated (note 11) Unreserved - undesignated Total fund equity and other credits Contingencies (note 13) Total liabilities, fund equity and other credits See accompanying notes to financial statements Governmental fund woes Special Debt Capital General Revenue Service Proiects $ 0 0 75,751 104,217 2,810 0 0 0 13,802,354 1,049,987 0 25,673,668 0. 0 0 0 0 0 15,726,593 0 262,118 8 0 26,653 0 0 0 0 29,757. 12,869 0 316,480 0 0 2,389,974 985,109 0 0 0 0 819,164 111,766 901,532 0 228,156 1,650 8,764 153,333 0 0 0 0. 141,939 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ 15.286.298 1.176.280 19.102.614 27.259.460 465,951 22,419 0 614,621 422,586 1,207 0 2,257 0 0 0 207,499 0 0 0 0 384,523 1,650 0 2,965,001 89,755 3,087 96,704 12,587 26,384 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2,293,442 985,109 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,389,199 28,363 2,390,146 4,787,074 141,939 0 16,712,468 17,527 13,755,160 0 0 8,731,959 0 1,147,917 0 13,722,900 13,897,099 1,147,917 16,712,468 22,472,386 $ 15,286,298 1,176,280 19,102,614 27,259,460 Page 12 Proprietary Fiduciary fund type fund type Account groups General General Totals Trust 8 Fixed Long -term (memorandum only) Enterprise Agency Asset Debt 2000 1999 0 140,432 0 0 320,400 693,337 11,315 0 0 0 14,125 13,575 4,580,148 0 0 0 45,106,157 37,785,030 0 3,999,778 0 0 3,999,778 3,913,274 3,286,498 0 0 0 19,013,091 3,306,034 114,515 0 0 0 403,294 381,667 2,170,225 0 0 0 2,170,225 2,010,560 106,986 0 0 0 466,092 323,203 76,457 0 0 0 3,451,540 3,167,347 0 0 0 0 0 7,647 1,560,390 0 0 0 3,392,852 6,622,279 4,527 0 0 0 396,430 1,567,183 1,165,534 0 0 0 1,165,534 981,068 0 0 0 0 141,939 116,901 0 0 0 0 0 145,012 41,353,939 0 90,961,462 0 132,315,401 125,502,870 79,454 0 0 0 79,454 97,273 0 0 0 16,712,468 16,712,468 407,283 0 0 0 58,103,542 58,103,542 58,512,616 0 0 0 2,220,886 2,220,886 612,972 54.509.988 4.140.210 90.961.462 77.036.896 289.473.208 246.167.131 725,828 0 0 0 1,828,819 1,475,418 120,881 0 0 0 546,931 472,925 94,563 0 0 0 302,062 29,078 327,363 0 0 0 327,363 401,692 0 41,678 0 0 3,392,852 6,622,279 355,681 98,754 0 0 656,568 567,286 566,094 0 0 2,220,886 2,813,364 765,979 50,593 0 0 0 50,593 14,354 0 0 0 0 0 80,593 5,040 0 0 0 3,283,591 2,958,573 0 0 0 0 0 145,012 210,000 0 0 426,010 636,010 744,898 13,785,000 0 0 74,390,000 88,175,000 73,005,000 16,241,043 140,432 0 77,036,896 102,013,153 87,283,087 0 0 90,961,462 0 90,961,462 85,126,833 5,725,001 0 0 0 5,725,001 6,177,967 1,607,120 0 0 0 1,607,120 2,042,755 30,936,824 0 0 0 30,936,824 28,910,713 0 3,999,778 0 0 20,871,712 6,806,382 0 0 0 0 22,487,119 7,324,261 0 0 0 0 14,870,817 22,495,133 38,268,945 3,999,778 90,961,462 0 187,460,055 158,884,044 54,509,988 4,140,210 90,961,462 77,036,896 289,473,208 246,167,131 Page 13 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Combined Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - AII Governmental Fund Types Year ended December 31, 2000 (with comparative totals for year ended December 31, 1999) Governmental fund types Special Debt Capital General Revenue Service Projects Revenues: Taxes (note 3) $ 13,575,850 0 738,349 8,590,313 Special assessments 0 0 721,871 438,005 Franchise fees 0 336,678 0 0 Licenses and permits 1,835,828 0 0 0 Intergovernmental 1,584,192 42,231 0 254,257 Charges for services 2,024,518 0 0 878,148 Fines and forfeitures 967,421 0 0 0 Investment Income 430,577 117,016 0 1,739,756 Interest on funds held with fiscal agent 0 0 88,788 0 Sales and rental of property 171,585 0 0 984,941 Other revenues 9,803 3,617 0 83,512 Total revenues 20,599,774 499,542 1,549,008 12,968,932 Expenditures: Current General government 2,635,357 0 0 0 Public safety 8,846,360 0 0 0 Public works 3,672,057 0 0 0 Parks 2,150,588 0 0 0 Unallocated general 346,099 0 0 0 Other 73,920 285,770 1,600 1,215,678 Capital outlay: General government 99,898 0 0 0 Public safety 375,731 0 0 0 Public works 555,332 0 0 0 Parks 104,921 0 0 0 Infrastructure 0 0 0 7,207,966 Other 0 8,646 0 0 Debt Service: Bond principal 0 0 6,050,000 0 Interest and fiscal charges 0 0 3,108,601 0 Total expenditures 18,860,263 294,416 9,160,201 8,423,644 Excess (deficiency) of revenues over expenditures 1,739,511 205,126 (7,611,193) 4,545,288 Other financing sources (uses): Operating transfers in (out): Operating transfers in (out) - General Fund 0 0 0 279,065 Operating transfers in (out) - Swimming Pool Fund 0 0 0 0 Operating transfers in (out} - Capital Projects Fund (279,065) 0 0 0 Operating transfers in (out)~Edinborough Park Fund (108,000) 0 0 0 Operating transfers in (out) -HRA 0 0 5,778,574 0 Operating transfers in (out) - General Debt Service Fund 0 0 0 (5,778,574) Operating transfers in (out) - Liquor Fund 0 0 0 919,000 Parkland dedication 85,520 0 0 0 Proceeds from sale of tax increment bonds 0 0 18,137,804 3,604,312 Total other financing sources (uses) (301,545) 0 23,916,378 (976,197) Excess (deficiency) of revenues and other financing sources over expenditures and other financing uses 1,437,966 205,126 16,305,185 3,569,091 Fund balance - January 1, as restated (note 10) 12,459,133 942,791 407,283 18,903,295 Fund balance - December 31 $ 13,897,099 1,147,917 16,712,468 22,472,386 See accompanying notes to financial statements Page 14 Totals Fiduciary Type (memorandum only) Expendable Trust 2000 1999 0 22,904,512 21,995,230 0 1,159,876 990,330 0 336,678 297,866 0 1,835,828 2,135,541 0 1,880,680 3,185,008 0 2,902,666 2,070,476 0 967,421 794,710 (116,184) 2,171,165 994,167 0 88,788 0 0 1,156,526 284,085 311,157 408,089 770,246 194,973 35,812,229 33,517,659 0 2,635,357 2,527,547 0 8,846,360 8,516,673 0 3,672,057 3,744,124 0 2,150,588 2,240,730 0 346,099 366,332 108,469 1,685,437 1,058,866 0 99,898 15,143 0 375,731 441,034 0 555,332 418,434 0 104,921 125,328 0 7,207,966 4,542,885 0 8,646 56,812 0 6,050,000 3,275,000 0 3,108,601 3,262,266 108,469 36,846,993 30,591,174 86,504 (1,034,764) 2,926,485 0 279,065 153,460 0 0 183,000 0 (279,065) (153,460) 0 (108,000) (206,000) 0 5,778,574 5,646,647 0 (5,778,574) (5,646,647) 0 919,000 0 0 85,520 264,424 0 21,742,116 0 0 22,638,636 241,424 86,504 21,603,872 3,167,909 3,913,274 36,625,776 33,457,867 3,999,778 58,229,648 36,625,776 Page 15 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Combined Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual - General and Special Revenue Fund Types Year ended December 31, 2000 (with comparative totals for year ended December 31, 1999) Fund balance - January 1 12,459,133 Fund balance - December 31 13.897.099 See accompanying notes to financial statements General Variance favorable Budget Actual (unfavorable) Revenues: Taxes (note 3) $ 13,505,158 13,575,850 70,692 Licenses and permits 1,399,500 1,835,828 436,328 Intergovernmental 1,615,000 1,584,192 (30,808) Charges for services 1,683,096 2,024,518 341,422 Fines and forfeitures 479,000 967,421 488,421 Investment income 30,400 430,577 400,177 Sales and rental of property 67,000 171,585 104,585 Other revenues 26,000 9,803 (16,197) Total revenues 18,805,154 20,599,774 1,794,620 Expenditures: Current: General government 2,709,531 2,635,357 74,174 Public safety 8,928,624 8,846,360 82,264 Public works 3,914,625 3,672,057 242,568 Parks 2,240,429 2,150,588 89,841 Unallocated general 337,804 346,099 (8,295) Other 0 73,920 (73,920) Capital outlay: General government 32,045 99,898 (67,853) Public safety 498,451 375,731 122,720 Public works 506,000 555,332 (49,332) Parks 100,645 104,921 (4,276) Total expenditures 19,268,154 18,860,263 407,891 Excess (deficiency) of revenues over expenditures (463,000) 1,739,511 2,202,511 Other financing sources (uses): Operating transfers in 463,000 0 (463,000) Operating transfers out 0 (387,065) (387,065) Parkland dedication 0 85,520 85,520 Total other financing sources (uses) 463,000 (301,545) (764,545) Excess (deficiency) of revenues and other financing sources over expenditures and other financing uses $ 0 _ 1,437,966 1,437,966 Fund balance - January 1 12,459,133 Fund balance - December 31 13.897.099 See accompanying notes to financial statements Page 16 0 12,459,133 10,920,409 0 13.897.099 12,459.133 Totals (memorandum only) Special Revenue 2000 1999 Variance Variance favorable favorable Budget Actual (unfavorable) Budget Actual (unfavorable) Actual 0 0 0 13,505,158 13,575,850 70,692 13,187,547 0 0 0 1,399,500 1,835,828 436,328 2,135,541 181,261 42,231 (139,030) 1,796,261 1,626,423 (169,838) 1,750,038 0 0 0 1,683,096 2,024,518 341,422 1,866,475 0 0 0 479,000 967,421 488,421 794,710 0 0 0 30,400 430,577 400,177 (267,839) 0 0 0 67,000 171,585 104,585 280,304 0 0 0 26,000 9,803 (16,197) 9,899 181,261 42,231 (139,030) 18,986,415 20,642,005 1,655,590 19,756,675 0 0 0 2,709,531 2,635,357 74,174 2,527,547 0 0 0 8,928,624 8,846,360 82,264 8,516,673 0 0 0 3,914,625 3,672,057 242,568 3,744,124 0 0 0 2,240,429 2,150,588 89,841 2,240,730 0 0 0 337,804 346,099 (8,295) 366,332 181,261 42,231 139,030 181,261 116,151 65,110 (89,430) 0 0 0 32,045 99,898 (67,853) 15,143 0 0 0 498,451 375,731 122,720 441,034 0 0 0 506,000 555,332 (49,332) 418,434 0 0 0 100,645 104,921 (4,276) 125,328 181,261 42,231 139,030 19,449,415 18,902,494 546,921 18,305,915 0 0 0 (463,000) 1,739,511 2,202,511 1,450,760 0 0 0 463,000 0 (463,000) 183,000 0 0 0 0 (387,065) (387,065) (359,460) 0 0 0 0 85,520 85,520 264,424 0 0 0 463,000 (301,545) (764,545) 87,964 0 0 0 0 1,437,966 1,437,966 1,538,724 0 12,459,133 10,920,409 0 13.897.099 12,459.133 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Combined Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings — All Proprietary Fund Types Year ended December 31, 2000 (with comparative totals for year ended December 31, 1999) Operating revenues: Charges for sales and services: Sales - Liquor Sales - Retail Sales - Utility Sales - Concessions Memberships Admissions Building rental Rental of equipment Greens fees Otherfees Total operating revenues Operating expenses: Cost of sales and services Personal services Contractual services Commodities Central services Depreciation Total operating expenses Operating income Nonoperating revenues (expenses): Investment income Donations Miscellaneous revenue (expense) Interest and fiscal charges Interest on capital lease Gain (loss) on disposal of capital assets Amortization of bond discount Total nonoperating expenses Income before operating transfers Operating transfers in (out): General fund Art center fund Liquor store fund Golf Course fund Arena fund Revolving fund Total operating transfers, net Net income Add depreciation on contributed assets Increase in retained earnings Retained earnings - January 1 Retained earnings - December 31 See accompanying notes to financial statements Page 17 Totals 2000 1999 $ 8,989,480 412,473 8,639,374 396,353 583,979 562,707 1,190,171 399,049 2,156,438 1,535,683 24,865,707 7,174,884 4,645,640 6,083,352 1,196,540 1,364,501 2,132,071 22,596,988 2,268,719 619,273 21,352 655 (681,487) (13,111) (249,072) (17,819) (320,209) 1,948,510 108,000 (139,000) 220,000 0 (81,000) (919,000) (811,000) 1,137,510 452,966 1,590,476 30,953,468 $ 32,543,944 8,423,812 376,148 8,378,216 391,037 520,848 581,044 1,129,746 377,198 2,046,256 1,332,433 23,556,738 6,704,254 4,147,974 5,536,401 1,033,585 1,293,228 2,103,687 20,819,129 2,737,609 408,055 17,283 67,293 (605,479) (15,511) 27,636 (16,341) (117,064) 2,620,545 23,000 (155,000) 680,000 35,000 (560,000) 0 23,000 2,643,545 448,134 3,091,679 27,861,789 30,953,468 Page 18 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA 21,352 35,189 Combined Statement of Cash Flows - All Proprietary Fund Types 145,012 Combining Statement of Cash Flows Decrease on advances from other funds (145,012) Year Ended December 31, 2000 Operating transfer in (out) - General Fund 108,000 (with comparative totals for year ended December 31, 1999) (139,000) (155,000) Totals Cash flows from operating activities: 2000 1999 Operating income $ 2,268,719 2,776,274 Adjustments to reconcile operating income (560,000) Operating transfer (out)-Revolving fund to net cash provided by operating activities 0 Net cash provided used for noncapital financing activities Depreciation expense 2,132,071 2,103,687 Changes in assets and liabilities: (Increase) decrease in accounts receivable 51,701 (72,651) (Increase) decrease in customer accounts receivable (159,665) 72,776 (Increase) decrease in special assessments receivable 28,755 (58,820) (Increase) decrease in due from other funds 3,249,321 (4,052,705) (Increase) decrease in due from other governments 685 (4,554) (Increase) decrease in inventory (184,466) 1,181 Increase (decrease) in accounts payable 93,803 (22,390) Increase in salaries payable 16,622 17,877 Increase (decrease) in contracts payable 81,393 (63,395) Increase (decrease) in accrued interest payable (74,329) 163,103 Decrease in due to other funds (200,000) (50,000) Increase (decrease) in due to other governments 200,361 (211,516) Increase in compensated absences payable 421,628 11,513 Increase in deposits payable 38,239 5,502 Miscellaneous revenue 655 23,921 Total adjustments 5,696,774 (2,136,471) Net cash provided by operating activities 7,965,493 639,803 Cash flows from noncapital financing activities: Donations 21,352 35,189 Increase in advances to other funds 145,012 808,417 Decrease on advances from other funds (145,012) (808,417) Operating transfer in (out) - General Fund 108,000 23,000 Operating transfer (out) -AR Center (139,000) (155,000) Operating transfer in- Liquor Store Fund 220,000 680,000 Operating transfer in -Golf Course Fund 0 35,000 Operating transfer (out) -Arena (81,000) (560,000) Operating transfer (out)-Revolving fund (919,000) 0 Net cash provided used for noncapital financing activities (789,648) 58,189 Cash flows from capital and related financing activities: Net acquisition of capital assets (3,109,973) (1,398,226) Gain (loss) on disposal of capital assets (249,072) 27,636 Proceeds from revenue bonds 0 6,870,000 Principal paid on revenue bonds (785,000) (850,000) Increase on bond discount 0 (54,368) Principal paid on capital lease (50,000) (50,000) Interest received from fiscal agent 137,041 68,275 Interest paid on capital lease (13,111) (15,511) Interest paid on bonds (681,487) (605,479) Net cash (used) provided for capital and related financing activities (4,751,602) 3,992,327 Cash flows from investing activities: Purchase of investments (2,820,478) (1,759,670) Decrease in interest receivable (106,986) 48,674 Investment income 482,232 326,581 Net cash used by investing activities (2,445,232) (1,384,415) Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents (20,989) 3,305,904 Cash and equivalents, beginning of year 3,318,802 12,898 Cash and equivalents, end of year $ 3,297,813 3,318,802 Supplemental disclosure of noncash noncapital financing activity: Contribution of fixed assets 0 8,181 Total noncash noncapital financing activity $ 0 8,181 See accompanying notes to financial statements Page 19 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Notes to General Purpose Financial Statements December 31, 2000 (1) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies The City operates under the "Optional Plan B" form of government according to applicable State of Minnesota Statutes. The Statutes prescribe a Council- Manager form of organization. The City provides the following services: public safety, highways and streets, sanitation, health and social services, culture- recreation, public improvements, planning and zoning, and general administration. The City was incorporated in 1888. The accounting policies of the City conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America as applicable to governments. The following is a summary of the more significant policies: A. Financial Reporting Entity In accordance with Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 14, "The Financial Reporting Entity" the City's financial reporting entity consists of (a) the primary government, (b) organizations for which the primary government is financially accountable, and (c) other organizations for which the nature and significance of their relationship with the primary government are such that exclusion would cause the reporting entity's financial statements to be misleading or incomplete. The primary government is financially accountable for the component unit if it appoints a voting majority of the component unit's governing body and is able to impose its will on the component unit or there is a potential for the component unit to provide specific financial benefits to, or impose specific financial burdens on, the primary government. As required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, the financial statements of the reporting entity include those of the primary government and its component units (legally separate organizations). The component unit discussed below is included in the City's reporting entity because of the significance of its operational or financial relationship with the City. In conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, the financial statements of a component unit has been included in the City's reporting entity as a blended component unit. The blended component unit's financial data are reported as part of the primary government. Blended Component Unit. The following component unit has been presented as a blended component unit because the component unit's government body is substantively the same as the governing body of the City. (Continued) Page 20 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina The Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina (HRA) strives to redevelop the residential and commercial areas of the City and to provide affordable housing, adequate jobs and a sound financial base for the City residents. The City Council members act as the HRA board and therefore the HRH's governing body is substantially the same as the City's governing body. No separate financial statements are available for the HRA. The HRA activities are included in the capital projects fund. B. Fund Accounting The accounts of the City are organized on the basis of funds and account groups, each of which is considered a separate accounting entity. The operations of each fund are accounted for with a separate set of self - balancing accounts that comprise its assets, liabilities, fund equity, revenues, and expenditures, or expenses, as appropriate. Government resources are allocated to and accounted for in individual funds based upon the purposes for which they are to be spent and the means by which spending activities are controlled. The various funds are grouped, in the financial statements in this report, into six generic fund categories and three broad fund types as follows: Governmental Funds General Fund —The General Fund is the primary operating fund of the City. It is used to account for all financial resources except those required to be accounted for in another fund. Special Revenue Funds — Special Revenue Funds are used to account for the proceeds of specific revenue sources that are legally restricted to expenditures for specified purposes. Debt Service Funds —Debt Service Funds are used to account for the accumulation of resources for, and the payment of, general long -term debt principal, interest, and related costs. Capital Project Funds — Capital Project Funds are used to account for the financial resources to be used for the acquisition or construction of major capital facilities (other than those financed by Proprietary Funds). Proprietary Funds Enterprise Funds — Enterprise Funds are used to account for operations (a) that are financed and operated in a manner similar to private business enterprises - where the intent of the governing body is that the costs (expenses, including (Continued) Page 21 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA depreciation) of providing goods or services to the general public on a continuing basis are financed or recovered primarily through user charges; or (b) where the governing body has decided that periodic determination of revenues earned, expenses incurred, and /or net income is appropriate for capital maintenance, public policy, management control, accountability or other purposes. Fiduciary Funds Trust and Agency Funds —Trust Funds account for assets held by the City in a trustee capacity. The expendable trust fund is accounted for in essentially the same manner as the governmental fund types, using the same measurement focus and basis of accounting. Expendable trust funds account for assets where both the principal and interest may be spent. Agency Funds are used to account for assets held by the City as an agent for individuals, private organizations, other governments, and /or other funds. Agency Funds are custodial in nature (assets equal liabilities) and do not involve measurement of results of operations. Account Groups The General Fixed Assets Account Group is used to account for fixed assets not accounted for in proprietary funds. The Long -Term Debt Account Group is used to account for general long -term debt and certain other liabilities that are not specific liabilities of proprietary funds. C. Measurement Focus All Governmental Funds and the expendable trust fund are accounted for on a spending or "financial flow" measurement focus. This means that only current assets and current liabilities are generally included on their balance sheets. Their reported fund balance is considered a measure of "available spendable resources ". Governmental Fund operating statements present increases (revenues and other financing sources) and decreases (expenditures and other financing uses) in net current assets. Accordingly, they are said to present a summary of sources and uses of "available spendable resources" during a period. Fixed assets used in Governmental Fund type operations (general fixed assets) are accounted for in the General Fixed Assets Account Group, rather than in Governmental Funds. Public domain (infrastructure) general fixed assets consisting of certain improvements other than buildings, including roads, bridges, curbs and gutters, streets and sidewalks, drainage systems, and lighting systems, are not capitalized along with other general fixed assets. No depreciation has been provided on general fixed assets. All fixed assets are valued at historical cost or estimated historical cost if actual cost is not available. Donated fixed assets are valued at their estimated fair market value on the date donated. (Continued) 14 Page 22 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Long -term liabilities expected to be financed from governmental funds are accounted for in the General Long -term Debt Account Group, not in the Governmental Funds. The exception to this general rule is for revenue bonds, which are accounted for in Enterprise Funds. The two account groups are not "funds." They are concerned only with the measurement of financial position. They are not involved with measurement of results of operations. Because of their spending measurement focus, expenditure recognition for Governmental Fund types is limited to exclude amounts represented by noncurrent liabilities. Since they do not affect net current assets, such long -term amounts are not recognized as governmental fund type expenditures or fund liabilities. They are instead reported as liabilities in the General Long -term Debt Account Group. All Proprietary Funds are accounted for on a cost of services or "capital maintenance" measurement focus. This means that current and long- term assets and current and long -term liabilities associated with their activity are included on their balance sheets. Their reported fund equity (net total assets) is segregated into contributed capital and retained earnings components. The operating statements of the funds present increases (revenues) and decreases (expenses) in net total assets. Depreciation -of exhaustible fixed assets used by Proprietary Funds is charged as an expense against their operations. Accumulated depreciation is reported on Proprietary Fund balance sheets. Depreciation has been provided over the estimated useful lives using the straight -line method. The estimated useful lives are as follows: Buildings 20 -30 years Equipment and machinery 5 -10 years Distribution systems, sewer mains and lift stations 50 years The City follows the practice of including, as part of property, plant and equipment of these funds, the costs of distribution systems, sewer mains and lift stations which are paid for by assessments against benefited property. Basis of Accounting Basis of accounting refers to when revenues and expenditures or expenses are recognized in the accounts and reported in the financial statements. Basis of accounting relates to the timing of the measurements made, regardless of the measurement focus applied. The Governmental Fund types and expendable trust fund are accounted for using the modified accrual basis of accounting. Their revenues are recognized when they become measurable and available as net current assets. "Measurable" means the amount of the transaction can be determined and "available" means collectible within the current period or soon enough thereafter to pay liabilities of the current period. The government considers all revenues available if they are collected within 60 days after year end. Major revenues that (Continued) Page 23 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA are determined to be susceptible to accrual include property taxes, special assessments, intergovernmental revenues, charges for service, and investment income. Major revenues that are determined not to be susceptible to accrual because they are not available soon enough to pay liabilities of the current period or are not objectively measurable include delinquent property taxes and assessments, licenses, permits, fines and forfeitures. Expenditures are generally recognized under the modified accrual basis of accounting when the related fund liability is incurred. Exceptions to this general rule include principal and interest on long -term debt which is recognized when due. The Proprietary Fund types are accounted for using the accrual basis of accounting. Their revenues are recognized when earned and their expenses are recognized when incurred. Unbilled utility service receivables are recorded at year end. During the course of normal operations, the City has numerous transactions between funds including expenditures and transfers of resources to provide services, construct assets and service debt. The Governmental and Proprietary Funds' financial statements generally reflect such transactions as transfers. Nonrecurring or nonroutine transfers of equity between funds are recorded as equity transfers and, accordingly, are reported as additions or deductions from fund equity. E. Budgets and Budgetary Accounting The City adopts an annual budget for the General Fund and the Community Development Block Grant Fund, a special revenue fund. (The council has elected not to prepare a budget for the Communications Fund, a special revenue fund.) The budgets are prepared on the modified accrual basis of accounting. The City follows these procedures in establishing the budgetary data reflected in the financial statements: 1. The City Manager submits to the City Council a proposed operating budget for the. fiscal year commencing the following January 1. The operating budget includes proposed expenditures and the means of financing them. 2. Public hearings are conducted to obtain taxpayer comments. 3. The budget is legally enacted by the passage of a resolution by the City Council. 4. Formal budgetary integration is employed as a management control device during the year. 5. Budgets for the General Fund and the Community Development Block Grant Fund are adopted on a basis consistent with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). (Continued) Page 24 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA 6. The City Council may authorize transfers of budgeted amounts between departments. 7. Reported budget amounts are as originally adopted or as amended by Council- approved supplemental appropriations and budget transfers. 8. Expenditures may not legally exceed appropriations by department unless offset by increases in revenues. All unencumbered appropriations lapse at year end. F. Encumbrances Encumbrance accounting, under which purchase orders, contracts, and other commitments for the expenditure of monies are recorded in order to reserve that portion of the applicable appropriation, is employed as an extension of formal budgetary integration. Encumbrances outstanding at year -end represent the estimated amount of the expenditures ultimately to result if unperformed contracts in process at year -end are completed. Encumbrances outstanding at year -end do not constitute expenditures . or liabilities, and therefore, are presented in the financial statements as reservations of fund balances. Encumbrances are recorded in the Construction Fund which is part of the Capital Projects Fund. G. Cash Cash balances from all funds are pooled together and invested to the maximum extent at favorable rates. This also allows certain funds to generate a temporary cash overdraft. Interest earned is allocated as determined by the Investment Advisory Committee. H. Investments The City's investments, including deferred compensation investments and investments with fiscal agents, are stated at fair value, based on quoted market prices. I. Statement of Cash Flows For purposes of the statement of cash flows, the City's Enterprise Funds consider all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. J. Interfund Receivables /Payables Transactions between funds that are representative of lending /borrowing (Continued) Page 25 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA arrangements outstanding at the end of the year are recorded as due to /from other funds for the current portion and as advance to /from other fund. K. Inventory Inventory is stated at the lower of cost (determined on a first in, first out basis) or market value. The costs of proprietary fund -type inventories are recorded as expenditures when consumed rather than when purchased. L. Compensated Absences It is the City's policy to permit employees to accumulate earned but unused vacation and sick pay benefits. Sick leave is payable when used or upon termination of employment as a lump sum payment equal to 50% of their balance up to 960 hours. Employees hired before January 1, 2000 elected to choose from the above sick leave policy or six weeks severance after 20 years of service. Vacation pay is payable when used or upon termination of employment. Vacation and sick pay is accrued when incurred in Proprietary Funds and reported as a liability. For Governmental Funds, vacation pay that is expected to be liquidated with expendable available financial resources is reported as an expenditure and a fund liability of the Fund that will pay it. Amounts not expected to be liquidated with expendable available financial resources are reported in the General Long -term Debt Account Group. No expenditure is reported for these amounts. The amount of accrued vacation pay at December 31, 2000 reported in the Governmental Funds, Proprietary Funds and General Long -term Debt Account Group was $26,384, $566,094, $2,220,886 respectively. M. Memorandum Only Total Column Total columns on the combined statements are captioned memorandum only to indicate that they are presented only to facilitate financial analysis. The columns do not present financial position, results of operations, or changes in financial position in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Interfund eliminations have not been made in the aggregation of these data. N. Comparative Data Comparative total data for the prior year have been presented in the accompanying financial statements in order to provide an understanding of changes in the City's financial position and operations. However, comparative data have not been presented in all statements because their inclusion would make certain statements unduly complex and difficult to understand. - (Continued) Page 26 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA O. Reclassifications Certain 2000 amounts were reclassified to conform to the 1999 presentation. P. GASB Statement No. 20 In accordance with Governmental Accounting Standards, proprietary and similar trust funds may apply all GASB pronouncements, as well as the following pronouncements issued on or before November 30, 1989, unless those pronouncements conflict with or contradict GASB pronouncements; Statements and Interpretations of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinions, and Accounting Research Bulletins (ARBs) of the Committee on Accounting Procedure. The City has elected to apply only FASB, APB, and ARB materials issued on or before November 30, 1989 to the Enterprise Funds. Q. Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues, expenditures, and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. (2) Cash and Investments Cash In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, the City maintains deposits at various financial institutions. Deposits are carried at cost plus accrued interest. Minnesota Statutes require that all City deposits be protected by an insurance surety bond or collateral. The market value of collateral pledged must equal 110% of the deposits not covered by insurance or bonds (140% in the case of mortgage notes pledged). At December 31, 2000 the City had deposits with a carrying value of $334,525, of which $4,200 was insufficiently insured or collateralized by securities held by the City's agent in the City's name. Investments The City is authorized by Minnesota Statutes to invest in the following: (a) Direct obligations or obligations guaranteed by the United States or its agencies; (b) Shares of investment companies registered under the Federal Investment Company Act of 1940 and whose only investments are in securities described in (a) above; (Continued) Page 27 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA (c) General obligations in the State of Minnesota or any of its municipalities; (d) Bankers' acceptances of United States banks eligible for purchase by the Federal Reserve System; (e) Commercial paper issued by United States corporations or their Canadian Subsidiaries, of the highest quality, and maturing in 270 days or less; (f) Guaranteed investment contracts issued or guaranteed by United States commercial banks or domestic branches of foreign banks or United States insurance companies or their subsidiaries; (g) Repurchase or reverse repurchase agreements with banks that are members of the Federal Reserve System with capitalization exceeding $10,000,000, a primary reporting dealer in U.S. government securities to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, or certain Minnesota securities broker - dealers; and (h) Futures contracts sold under authority of Minnesota Statutes 471.56, subdivision 5. The City's cash and investments are categorized in the following manner: Category 1— Includes investments that are insured or registered for which the securities are held by the City or its agent in the City's name. Category 2— Includes uninsured and unregistered investments for which the securities are held by the counterparty's trust department or agent in the City's name. The investment balances at December 31, 2000 were as follows: Certificates of deposit Commercial paper Banker's acceptance Money Market investments Government securities: United States Treasury Notes Federal National Mortgage Association Government National Mortgage Association Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation Federal Home Loan Bank SBA Pool Cash and investments with fiscal agents Cash and investments with plan administrators Total investments Credit Risk Category Category Category Fair 1 2 Value $ 1,052,002 0 1,052,002 6,978,000 14,845,657 21,823,657 0 883,009 883,009 3,495 5,809,621 5,813,116 711,152 2,229,682 2,940,834 2,298,085 3,440,462 5,738,547 0 2,147 2,147 1,153,838 3,147,638 4,301,476 0 1,460,487 1,460,487 316,650 774,232 1,090,882 $ 12,513,222 32,592,937 45,106,157 19,013,091 3,999,778 $ 68,119,026 (Continued) Page 28 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, the City invests in various mortgage- backed securities, such as collateralized mortgage obligations. Included in the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation investments are approximately $498,435 of collateralized mortgage obligations, debt instruments issued by special purpose entities which are secured by pools of mortgage loans or other mortgage- backed securities. Payments of interest and principal on underlying collateral provide the funds to pay debt service on the collateralized mortgage obligation. The Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation is a federally chartered corporation and guarantees timely payment and principal to security holders. The cash flows and yields on collateralized mortgage obligations are sensitive to the rate of principal payments (including prepayments) on the underlying collateral. For example, a rapid or slow rate of principal payments on the underlying collateral may have a material adverse effect on the yield to maturity of the collateralized mortgage obligations. Deposits at December 31, 2000 were as follows: Checking accounts Cash on hand Cash with trustee (3) Property Taxes Carrying Amount $ 179,968 14,125 140,432 $ 334,525 Bank balance 1,193,409 0 0 1,193,409 The City Council annually adopts a tax levy and certifies it to the County for collection in October of each year. The County is responsible for billing and collecting all property taxes for itself, the City, the local school district and other taxing authorities. Such taxes become a lien on January 1 of the following year and are recorded as receivables by the City at that date. Real property taxes are payable by property owners on May 15 and October 15 of each calendar year. These taxes are collected by the County and remitted to the City on or before July 5 and December 4 of the same year. Additionally, delinquent collections in November and December are remitted to the City each January. The City has no ability to enforce payment of property taxes by property owners. The County possesses this authority. The City recognizes property tax revenue when it becomes both measurable and available to finance expenditures of the current period. In practice, current and delinquent taxes received by the City in July and December are recognized as revenue for the current year. Taxes not collected by the County by December 31 (remitted to the City by the following January) are classified as delinquent and unremitted taxes receivable. (Continued) CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA (4) Fixed Assets Page 29 A summary of changes in general fixed assets during 2000 is as follows: Balance Balance January 1 Additions Deletions December 31 Land $22,910,332 0 4,512 22,905,820 Land impovements 12,933,485 0 5,784 12,927,701 Buildings 20,637,734 116,164 69,372 20,684,526 Furniture & fixtures 1,343,762 159,317 347,823 1,155,256 Vehicles 4,417,848 791,856 395,695 4,814,009 Sidewalks 310,995 0 0 31Q995 Leasehold improvements 190,330 0 1,785 188,545 Miscellaneous equipment 320 ,507 22,827 155,525 187,809 Park & playgramd equipment 903,293 81,228 119,048 865,473 Hgh%WeqLzpment 2,197,662 125,862 162,032 2,161,492 Pclioe equipment 721,821 28,929 149,105 601,645 Fire equipment 1,118,955 22,859 246,944 894,870 Election equipment 138,114 3,913 96,514 45,513 Engineering Equiprrent 97,308 0 38,276 59,032 Traffic signals 153,570 0 0 153,570 Tools 5,812 0 0 5,812 Parks 15,979,022 314,060 0 16,293,082 C istnxtion in progress 746,282 5,960,030 0 6,706,312 Total $85,126,832 7,627,045 1,792,415 90,961,462 A summary of proprietary fund fixed assets at December 31,2000 is as follows: Enterprise Fund Land $1,088,965 Golf course 4,612,131 Land improvements 878,484 Water distribution system 12,506,744 Sewer collection system 12,956,228 Major recreation facilities 13,455,499 Major water facilities 16,222,767 Buildings- liquor stores 695,577 Furniture, fixtures and equipment 4,339,639 Vehicles 513,314 Lease property - capital lease 468,580 Construction in progress 2,975,489 70,713,417 Less accumulated depreciation (29,359,478) Net book value $41,353,939 (Continued) CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA (5) Long -term Debt Bonded Debt Page 30 The City has four types of bonded debt outstanding at December 31, 2000: tax increment bonds, general obligation bonds, improvement bonds and revenue bonds. The first type of bond is payable solely from tax increment monies with any deficiency to be provided for by general property taxes. The second type is payable solely from general property taxes. The third and fourth types are payable primarily from special assessments and enterprise revenue, respectively, with any deficiency to be provided for by general property taxes. The bonded debt outstanding is summarized as follows: Balance December 31, Maturities Interest rates 2000 Tax Increment Bonds 2001-2013 4.50 - 6.45 $66,670,000 General Obligation Bonds 2001-2017 4.40 - 5.75 7,550,000 Improvement Bonds 2001-2001 5.00 - 5.20 170,000 Revenue Bonds 2001-2013 3.20 - 6.05 13,785,000 Total $88,175,000 Changes in long -term debt during the year were as follows: Balance Balance January 1, Issued/ Redeemed/ December 31, 2000 Increases decreases 2000 Tax Increment Bonds $50,260,000 22,005,000 5,595,000 66,670,000 General Obligation Bonds 7,825,000 0 275,000 7,550,000 Improvement Bonds 350,000 0 180,000 170,000 Revenue Bonds 14,570,000 0 785,000 13,785,000 Total bonds 73,005,000 22,005,000 6,835,000 88,175,000 Compensated absences payable 612,973 1,607,913 0 2,220,886 Obligation under capital lease $484,898 0 58,888 426,010 The City had the following revenue bonds outstanding at December 31, 2000: Recreation Facility Bonds, Series 1992A Recreation Refunding Bonds, Series 1992C Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 1999A Recreation Refunding Bonds, Series 1999B $3,520,000 3,730,000 3,265,000 3,270,000 $13,785,000 (Continued) Page 31 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA The Recreation Refunding Bonds (Golf Course Bonds) are general obligation revenue bond issues payable from the Golf Course Enterprise Fund with any deficiency to be provided first from Liquor Fund revenue and then from general property taxes. The Recreation Facility Bonds are general obligation revenue bond issues payable from the Golf Course, Ice Arena and Swimming Pool Funds with any deficiency to be provided first from Liquor Fund revenue and then from general property taxes. The Utility Bonds are general obligation revenue bond issues payable from the Utility Fund and then from general property taxes. The annual requirements to amortize all debt outstanding as of December 31, 2000, including interest payments of $26,689,491 are as follows: Year ending Tax General December 31 Increment Obligation Improvement Revenue Total 2001 $ 6,475,971 698,888 174,420 1,444,443 8,793,722 2002 8,940,195 685,163 0 1,481,638 11,106,996 2003 12,658,406 695,388 0 1,700,673 15,054,467 2004 8,842,601 679,625 0 1,741,248 11,263,474 2005 8,960,765 687,913 0 1,751,720 11,400,398 2006 -2018 39,058,088 8,173,256 0 10,014,094 57,245,438 $ 84,936,026 11,620,233 174,420 18,133,816 114,864,495 During 2000, the City issued $2,620,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 2000A and $3,565,000 Taxable General Obligation Bonds, Series 2000B to finance the construction of various public improvements and environmental remediation costs within the Grandview Tax Increment Financing District in the City. During 2000, the City issued $15,820,000 General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 2000C to replace the General Obligation Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 1992B. These will be refunded by means of "crossover' refunding in 2001. The cumulative savings will be $1,000,307, and the net present value of savings is $817,042. (Continued) CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Legal Debt Margin Page 32 Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475, as amended, provide that the city shall not incur or be .subject to a net debt in excess of 2% of the market value of taxable property. At December 31, 2000, the legal debt margin was $89,684,600 calculated as follows: Market value Debt limit - 2% of market value Amount of general obligation $ 88,175,000 debt Less: Tax increment bonds $ 66,670,000 Improvement bonds 170,000 Revenue bonds 13,785,000 Total deductions 80,625,000 Total amount of debt applicable to debt limit Legal debt margin $ 4,861,730,000 97,234,600 7,550,000 $ 89,684,600 (Continued) CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Long -term Debt - Other Page 33 The City is the administering authority for the following tax increment finance districts. Tax capacity values are for taxes payable in 2000. 50th and France -No. 1200, a redevelopment district established in 1974 pursuant to Minnesota Statutes with a termination date of 2009. Original tax capacity value $ 173,521 Current tax capacity value 1,409,957 Captured tax capacity value: Retained by authority 1,236,436 Shared with other taxing districts 0 General obligation tax increment bonds issued 5,350,000 Total loans incurred 0 Amounts redeemed 2,200,000 Outstanding bonds and loans at December 31, 2000 $ 3,150,000 Southeast Edina Redevelopment District -No. 1201, a redevelopment district established in 1977 pursuant to Minnesota Statutes with a termination date of 2009. Original tax capacity value $ 150,717 Current tax capacity value 3,014,363 Captured tax capacity value: Retained by authority 2,863,646 Shared with other taxing districts 0 General obligation tax increment bonds issued 22,110,000 Total loans incurred 0 Amounts redeemed 12,785,000 Outstanding bonds and loans at December 31, 2000 $ 9,325,000 Grandview Area Redevelopment District -No. 1202, a redevelopment district established in 1984 pursuant to Minnesota Statutes with a termination date of 2010. Original tax capacity value Current tax capacity value Captured tax capacity value: Retained by authority Shared with other taxing districts General obligation tax increment bonds issued Total loans incurred Amounts redeemed Outstanding bonds and loans at December 31, 2000 $ 291,009 889,061 598,052 0 8,235,000 0 1,450,000 $ 6,785,000 (Continued) Page 34 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Southeast Edina Redevelopment District -No. 1203, a redevelopment district established in 1988 pursuant to Minnesota Statutes with a termination date of 2016. Original tax capacity value $ 308,622 Current tax capacity value 2,697,595 Captured tax capacity value: Retained by authority 2,388,973 Shared with other taxing districts 0 General obligation tax increment bonds issued 51,554,724 Total loans incurred 0 Amounts redeemed 4,144,724 Outstanding bonds and loans at December 31, 2000 $ 47,410,000 Economic Development District -No. 1204, a development district established in 1989 pursuant to Minnesota Statutes with a termination date of 1997. Original tax capacity value Decertified Current tax capacity value Decertified Captured tax capacity value: Retained by authority 0 Shared with other taxing districts 0 General obligation tax increment bonds issued 0 Total loans incurred 0 Amounts redeemed 0 Outstanding bonds and loans at December 31, 2000 $ 0 70th and Cahill Redevelopment District -No. 1207, a development district established in 1990 pursuant to Minnesota Statutes with a termination date of 2000. Original tax capacity value Decertified Current tax capacity value Decertified Captured tax capacity value: Retained by authority 0 Shared with other taxing districts 0 General obligation tax increment bonds issued 0 Total loans incurred 0 Amounts redeemed 0 Outstanding bonds and loans at December 31, 2000 $ 0 General Obligation tax increment bonds issued amounts were restated to eliminate the effect of doubling the bonds due to crossover refundings. (Continued) Page 35 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA (6) Retirement Plans A. Defined Benefit Pension Plans The City is involved in one pension program as follows: (a) Defined Benefit Pension Plans - Statewide: Plan Description All full -time and certain part-time employees of the City of Edina are covered by defined benefit plans administered by the Public Employees Retirement Association of Minnesota (PERA). PERA administers the Public Employees Retirement Fund (PERF), and the Public Employees Police and Fire Fund (PEPFF) which are cost - sharing multiple - employer retirement plans. These plans are established and administered in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Chapters 353 and 356. PERF members belong to either the Coordinated Plan or the Basic Plan. Coordinated Plan members are covered by Social Security and. Basic Plan members are not. All new members must participate in the Coordinated Plan. All police officers, fire- fighters and peace officers who qualify for membership by statute are covered by the PEPFF. PERA provides retirement benefits as well as disability benefits to members, and benefits to survivors upon death of eligible members. Benefits are established by State Statute, and vest after three years of credited service. The defined retirement benefits are based on a member's highest average salary for any five successive years of allowable service, age, and years of credit at termination of service. Two methods are used to compute benefits for PERF's Coordinated and Basic Plan members. The retiring member receives the higher of a step -rate benefit accrual formula (Method 1) or a level accrual formula (Method 2). Under Method 1, the annuity accrual rate for a Basic Plan member is 2.2 percent of average salary for each of the first 10 years of service and 2.7 percent for each remaining year. The annuity accrual rate for a Coordinated Plan member is 1.2 percent of average salary for each of the first 10 years and 1.7 percent for each remaining year. Under Method 2, the annuity accrual rate is 2.7 percent of average salary for Basic Plan members and 1.7 percent for Coordinated Plan members for each year of service. For PEPFF members, the annuity accrual rate is 3.0 percent for each year of service. For all PEPFF members and PERF members whose annuity is calculated using Method 1, a full annuity is available when age plus years of service equal 90. A reduced retirement annuity is also available to eligible members seeking early retirement. There are different types of annuities available to members upon retirement. A normal annuity is a lifetime annuity that ceases upon the death of the retiree - no survivor annuity is payable. There are also various types of joint and survivor annuity options available which will reduce the monthly normal annuity amount, (Continued) Page 36 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA because the annuity is payable over joint lives. Members may also leave their contributions in the fund upon termination of public service in order to qualify for a deferred annuity at retirement age. Refunds of contributions are available at any time to members who leave public service, but before retirement benefits begin. The benefit provisions stated in the previous paragraphs of this section are current provisions and apply to active plan participants. Vested, terminated employees who are entitled to benefits but are not receiving them yet are bound by the provisions in effect at the time they last terminated their public service. PERA issues a publicly available financial report that includes financial statements and required supplementary information for PERF and PEPFF. That report may be obtained by writing to PERA, 514 St. Peter Street #200, St. Paul, Minnesota, 55102 or by calling (651) 296 -7460 or 1- 800 - 652 -9026. Funding Policy Minnesota Statute Chapter 353 sets the rate for employer and employee contributions. These statutes are established and amended by the state legislature. The City makes annual contributions to the pension plans equal to the amount required by state statutes. PERF Basic Plan members and Coordinated Plan members are required to contribute 8.75% and 4.75 %, respectively, of their annual covered salary. PEPFF members are required to contribute 6.20% of their annual covered salary. The City of Edina is required to contribute the following percentages of annual covered payroll: 11.43% for Basic Plan PERF members, 5.18% for Coordinated Plan PERF members, and 9.30% for PEPFF members. The City's contributions to PERF and PEPFF for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999, and 1998 were equal to the required contributions for each year, as follows: 2000 1999 1998 PERF $485,277 459,914 446,033 PEPFF $439,163 475,059 515,730 (7) Deferred Compensation Plan The City offers its employees six deferred compensation plans created in accordance with Internal Revenue Code Section 457. The plans are Aetna, International City Manager's Association (ICMA), Great West, T. Rowe Price, Minnesota State Retirement System (MSRS), and Minnesota Mutual. The plans, available to all City employees, permit participants to defer a portion of their salary until future years. The deferred compensation is not available to participants until termination, retirement, death, or unforeseeable emergency. The City is trustee for two of the plans and accordingly, the plan assets (recorded at fair value) and fund balance are recorded in an expendable trust fund. (Continued) Page 37 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA (8) Segment Information for Enterprise Funds The City maintains Enterprise Funds for utility (water and sewer) services, liquor facilities, golf course and arena. Individual funds are also maintained for other enterprise operations designated below as "Other Enterprise Funds" which are recreational in nature such as: swimming pool, art center and Edinborough Park/Centennial Lake. Segment information for the year ended December 31, 2000 is as follows: Operating Revenues Depreciation Operating income (loss) Nonoperating revenues (expenses), net Operating transfers in (out) Net income Property additions Property deletions Net working capital Bonds payable Total assets Total retained earnings (deficit) utility Liquor $ 8,793,386 8,989,480 866,758 57,609 1,590,410 984,077 (29,103) (22,944) 0 (1,139,000) 1,561,307 (177,867) 3,076,789 0 194,761 77,634 6,245,260 1,582,787 3,265,000 0 33,058,598 2,652,678 28,839,064 2,196,948 259,357 236,620 387,367 2,435,371 7,760,000 10,081,282 1,831,517 (208,177) 38,593 52,017 (56,624) 1,660,000 4,724,466 (551,552) (297,110) 54,245 385,791 679,391 1,100,000 3,992,964 Total Enterprise Funds 24,865,707 2,132,071 2,268,719 (320,209) (811,000) 1,137,510 3,406,247 1,097,570 10,886,185 13,785,000 54,509,988 227,967 32,543,944 (Continued) Other Golf Enterprise Course Arena Funds 3,954,008 1,136,957 1,991,876 508,189 321,095 378,420 597,676 (174,245) (729,199) (338,319) (114,932) 185,089 0 81,000 247,000 259,357 236,620 387,367 2,435,371 7,760,000 10,081,282 1,831,517 (208,177) 38,593 52,017 (56,624) 1,660,000 4,724,466 (551,552) (297,110) 54,245 385,791 679,391 1,100,000 3,992,964 Total Enterprise Funds 24,865,707 2,132,071 2,268,719 (320,209) (811,000) 1,137,510 3,406,247 1,097,570 10,886,185 13,785,000 54,509,988 227,967 32,543,944 (Continued) Page 38 (9) CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Due From To Other Funds Interfund receivables and payables as of December 31, 2000 were as follows: (10) Restatement of Fund Equity During the year ended December 31, 2000, the City changed its accounting and financial reporting for certain construction contracts that historically had been presented in the Capital Projects Fund. Beginning in 2000, the activity is reported in the Utility Fund, an Enterprise fund, to comply with generally accepted accounting principles. This change qualifies for reporting as a prior -period adjustment. Accordingly, the City has restated beginning fund balances for fiscal 1999 for the effects of the correction as follows: Capital Projects Fund Fund equity as previously reported at January 1, 1999 $6,547,182 Adjustment 1,224,943 Fund equity as restated at January 1, 1999 $7,772,125 (Continued) Interfund Interfund Fund Receivables Payables General (including amount due from Edina Housing And Redevelopment Authority of $777,486) $ 819,164 384,523 Special Revenue: Community Development Block Grant 0 1,650 Communications 111,766 0 Debt Service: General Debt Service 742,698 0 Improvement Bond Redemption II 158,834 0 Capital Project: Construction 0 1,600,948 Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina 0 777,486 Revolving 0 586,567 Enterprise: Utilities 179,441 0 Liquor 1,051,358 0 Swimming Pool 243,000 0 Golf Course 54,973 0 Arena 568 0 Art Center 8,618 0 Edinborough Park/Centennial Lake 22,432 0 Agency: Police Seizure 0 41,678 $ 3,392,852 3,392,852 (10) Restatement of Fund Equity During the year ended December 31, 2000, the City changed its accounting and financial reporting for certain construction contracts that historically had been presented in the Capital Projects Fund. Beginning in 2000, the activity is reported in the Utility Fund, an Enterprise fund, to comply with generally accepted accounting principles. This change qualifies for reporting as a prior -period adjustment. Accordingly, the City has restated beginning fund balances for fiscal 1999 for the effects of the correction as follows: Capital Projects Fund Fund equity as previously reported at January 1, 1999 $6,547,182 Adjustment 1,224,943 Fund equity as restated at January 1, 1999 $7,772,125 (Continued) Page 39 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA (11) Reserved or Designated Fund Equity The following fund equity balances as of December 31, 2000 have been reserved or designated for the reasons noted below: General Fund: Reserved for prepaid insurance $141,939 Designated for Parkland dedication 122,494 Designated for Edinborough trust 4,631,588 Designated for unrealized investment gain 168,982 Designated for equipment replacement 2,389,053 Designated for insurance claims 775,765 Designated for General Fund operations 5,667,278 Debt Service Funds: Reserved for debt service 16,712,468 Capital Projects: Reserved for encumbrances 17,527 Designated for capital improvements 8,731,959 Enterprise Funds: Reserved for debt service 1,607,120 Trust and Agency Funds: Reserved for deferred compensation plan participants 3,999,778 Total fund equity reservations and designations $44,965,951 (12) Fund Deficits The following funds had deficit fund balances or retained earnings at December 31, 2000: Capital Project Fund: Construction Enterprise Fund: Arena $1,615,406) (551,552) The Capital Projects construction fund deficit will be covered in future periods by special assessment collections, tax increments, operating revenues, or State and bond proceeds. The enterprise Arena fund deficits will be covered in future periods by operating revenues and operating transfers. (Continued) CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA (13) Contingencies Page 40 The City Attorney has indicated that existing and pending lawsuits, claims and other actions in which the City is a defendant are either covered by insurance or will not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition of the City. (14) Capital Lease The City has recorded a capital lease for equipment installed in the Arena, Golf Course and Edinborough Park Enterprise Funds. The assets acquired through capital leases are as follows: Asset Golf Course Edinborough Arena Park Machinery and equipment $37,966 341,698 88,916 Less: Accumulated depreciation (26,576) (239,188) (62,241) Total $11,390 102,510 26,675 The following is a schedule by years of future minimum lease payments under the capital lease together with the present value of the net minimum lease payments as of December 31, 2000: Year ending December 31: 2001 $65,483 2002 67,620 2003 64,395 2004 35,971 Total minimum lease payments 233,469 Less: Amount representing interest (23,469) Present value of net minimum lease payments $210,000 The City has recorded a capital lease for the purchase /construction of the Fire Station at 7335 York Avenue South. The terms of the lease agreement extend to the year 2006 and provide for an ownership transfer to the City at the termination of the lease. (Continued) Page 41 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA The asset acquired through this capital lease is as follows: Asset General Fixed Assets Building $630,749 Less: accumulated depreciation — Total $630,749 Year ending December 31: 2001 $83,761 2002 83,761 2003 83,761 2004 83,761 2005 83,761 2006 83,760 Total minimum lease payments 502,565 Less: Amount representing interest (76,555) Present value of net minimum lease payments $426,010 (15) Related Party Transactions During the past fiscal year, one of several depository institutions with which the City maintained cash balances and conducted transactions, was considered a related party since a current elected member of the City Council is employed as an officer of this institution. (16) Fund Equity —Contributed Capital The following is a summary of the changes in contributed capital: (Continued) Enterprise Art Swimming Golf Edin. Pk. Utilities Center Pool Course Arena Cent. Lake Contributed capital: Balance January 1, 2000 $ 21,463 310,301 1,564,297 3,600 3,474,150 804,156 Less: Delete Contributed Assets 0 (1,565) 0 0 0 (93,919) Less: Transfer of depreciation To contributed capital 443 16,810 (96,033) 800 (187,352) (56,044) Balance December 31, 2000 $ 21,020 291,926 1,468,264 2,800 3,286,798 654,193 (Continued) CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA (17) Risk Management Page 42 The City is exposed to various risks of loss related to torts; theft of, damage to, and destruction of assets; errors and omissions; injuries to employees; and natural disasters. Workers compensation, automobile, liability and pollution coverage are provided through an insurance company. The City pays an annual premium for this coverage and all claims are paid from the plan up to the annual maximum of $600,000 set by the State. The City is not subject to a deductible for workers compensation, automobile, liability and pollution coverage. Property coverage is also provided by an insurance company. The City pays an annual premium for this coverage, and all claims are paid for by the plan. The City has a $5,000 deductible per occurrence, with an annual maximum of $52,053,445. Police professional insurance coverage is provided by an insurance company. The City pays an annual premium for the coverage, and has a $10,000 deductible per occurrence, with a $500,000 annual maximum. Public official liability insurance coverage is provided by an insurance company. The City pays an annual premium for this coverage, and has a $15,000 deductible per occurrence, with a $1,000,000 annual maximum. Inland Marine contractor's equipment insurance coverage is provided by an insurance company. The City pays an annual premium for this coverage, and has a $1,000 deductible and $100,000 maximum per occurrence, with a $1,904,460 annual maximum. Boiler and machinery insurance coverage is provided by an insurance company. The City pays an annual premium for this coverage, and has a $2,500 deductible per occurrence, with a $1,000,000 annual maximum. Ambulance professional liability insurance coverage is provided by an insurance company. The City pays an annual premium for this coverage, and a $500,000 annual maximum. A public employee's blanket bond and a public official bond are provided by an insurance company. The. City pays an annual premium for this coverage, and is subject to limits of $500 to $50,000 per individual for the public official bond, and a $50,000 annual maximum for the public employee's blanket bond. The City covers all losses above the per occurrence and annual deductibles through a reinsurance policy. The City has designated $775,765 in the general fund to finance potential uninsured loss. Settlement claims have not exceeded insurance coverage for either of the past three years. (Continued) Page 43 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA (18) Conduit Debt Obligations As of December 31, 2000 the City of Edina had outstanding 3 series of Housing and Health Care Revenue Bonds, with an aggregate principal amount payable of $35,575,000. The bonds are payable solely from revenues of the respective organizations and do not constitute an indebtedness of the City, and are not a charge against its general credit or taxing power. Accordingly, the bonds are not reported as liabilities in the accompanying financial statements. (19) Excess of Expenditures Over Appropriations For the year ending December 31, 2000, expenditures exceeded appropriations in the following departments: All unfavorable variances were funded by favorable expenditure variances from other departments or excess revenues. Budget Actual Variance General Government: Administration $792,883 798,115 (5,232) Finance 478,894 514,466 (35,572) Assessing 581,104 600,961 (19,857) Unallocated General: Contingencies 76,500 89,531 (13,031) Share of Special Assess. 20,000 22,505 (2,505) Suburban Rate Authority 4,000 4,496 (496) Central Services: General 3,924,348 3,989,849 (65,501) Public Works Building 239,004 306,721 (67,717) All unfavorable variances were funded by favorable expenditure variances from other departments or excess revenues. FINANCIAL_SECTION= Combining and;lnd"'du - Fun& and AccountGroup,Statement§ General'Furid Page 44 GENERAL FUND The General Fund accounts for the revenues and expenditures used to cant' out basic governmental activities of the City such as general government, public safety, public works, and parks and recreation. Revenue is recorded by source (e.g., taxes, licenses and permits, intergovernmental revenues, fines and forfeitures, charges for services). General Fund expenditures are made primarily for current day -to -day operations and operating equipment. This fund accounts for all financial transactions not properly accounted for in another fund. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA General Fund Balance Sheet December 31, 2000 (with comparative amounts for December 31, 1999) Assets Cash Petty cash and change funds Investments Accounts receivable Accrued interest receivable Taxes receivable: Delinquent Allowance for uncollectible taxes Due from other funds Due from other governments Prepaid expenses Total assets Liabilities and Fund Balance Liabilities: Accounts payable Salaries payable Due to other funds Due to other governments Compensated absences payable Deposits payable Total liabilities Fund balance: Reserved Unreserved: Designated Undesignated Total fund balance Total liabilities and fund balance 2000 1999 $ 0 136,354 2,810 2,310 13,802,354 11,449,250 262,118 259,379 29,757 19,442 116,362 99,202 (116,362) (99,202) 819,164 1,387,842 228,156 278,504 141,939 116,901 $ 15,286,298 13,649,982 465,951 422,586 384,523 89,755 26,384 0 1,389,199 141,939 438,069 367,615 221,821 152,804 8,540 2,000 1,190,849 2,407,155 13,755,160 0 7,324,261 2,727,717 13,897,099 12,459,133 $ 15,286,298 13,649,982 Page 45 Page 46 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA General Fund Statement of Revenue, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual Year ended December 31, 2000 (with comparative actual amounts for year ended December 31, 1999) 2000 1999 Variance Favorable Budget Actual (unfavorable) Actual Revenues: Taxes $ 13,505,158 13,575,850 70,692 13,187,547 Licenses and permits 1,399,500 1,835,828 436,328 1,998,798 Intergovernmental 1,615,000 1,584,192 (30,808) 1,703,797 Charges for service 1,683,096 2,024,518 341,422 2,010,532 Fines and forfeitures 479,000 967,421 488,421 794,710 Investment income 30,400 430,577 400,177 (267,839) Sale and rental of property 67,000 171,585 104,585 280,304 Other revenues 26,000 9,803 (16,197) 2,585 Total revenues 18,805,154 20,599,774 1,794,620 19,710,434 Expenditures: Current: General government 2,709,531 2,635,357 74,174 2,527,547 Public safety 8,928,624 8,846,360 82,264 8,516,673 Public works 3,914,625 3,672,057 242,568 3,744,685 Parks 2,240,429 2,150,588 89,841 2,240,731 Unallocated general 337,804 346,099 (8,295) 366,332 Other 0 73,920 (73,920) (135,670) Capital outlay: General government 32,045 99,898 (67,853) 15,143 Public safety 498,451 375,731 122,720 441,034 Public works 506,000 555,332 (49,332) 417,871 Parks 100,645 104,921 (4,276) 125,328 Total expenditures 19,268,154 18,860,263 407,891 18,259,674 Excess (deficiency) of revenues over expenditures (463,000) 1,739,511 2,202,511 1,450,760 Other financing sources (uses): Operating transfers in (out) Liquor fund 463,000 0 (463,000) 0 Swimming Pool Fund 0 0 0 183,000 Capital Project funds 0 (279,065) (279,065) (153,460) Edinborough Park/Centennial Lake 0 (108,000) (108,000) (206,000) Parkland dedication 0 85,520 85,520 264,424 Total other financing sources 463,000 (301,545) (764,545) 87,964 Excess of revenues and other financing sources over expenditures and other financing uses $ 0 1,437,966 1,437,966 1,538,724 Fund balance - January 1 12,459,133 10,920,409 Fund Balance - December 31 $ 13,897,099 $ 12,459,133 Page 47 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA General Fund Schedule of Revenues - Budget and Actual Year ended December 31, 2000 (with comparative actual amounts for year ended December 31, 1999) Charges for service: Building Department 2,500 2000 7,674 1999 City Clerk 0 4,155 Variance 0 Fire Department 20,000 21,027 Favorable 12,863 Ambulance Fees Budget Actual (unfavorable) Actual Taxes: 128,000 117,098 (10,902) 161,371 General property tax $ 13,500,158 13,569,399 69,241 13,183,581 Penalties and interest 5,000 6,451 1,451 3,966 Total taxes 13,505,158 13,575,850 70,692 13,187,547 Licenses and permits 1,399,500 1,835,828 436,328 1,998,798 Intergovernmental: 24,500 21,725 (2,775) 24,175 Federal aid 8,000 6,706 (1,294) 138,260 State grants: 1,000 1,320 320 1,162 Homestead credit 979,624 979,624 0 956,476 State highway aid 140,000 140,000 0 140,000 Other 0 1,476 1,476 15,153 Police aid 321,000 294,436 (26,564) 291,704 County grants: 1,683,096 2,024,518 341,422 2,010,532 Health programs 166,376 161,950 (4,426) 162,204 Total intergovernmental 1,615,000 1,584,192 (30,808) 1,703,797 Charges for service: Building Department 2,500 10,174 7,674 84,545 City Clerk 0 4,155 4,155 0 Fire Department 20,000 21,027 1,027 12,863 Ambulance Fees 948,000 1,094,552 146,552 1,034,216 Police Department 128,000 117,098 (10,902) 161,371 Engineering 85,000 167,717 82,717 192,323 Health Department 15,000 13,821 (1,179) 15,117 Planning Department 16,000 23,275 7,275 25,565 Surcharge 0 3,689 3,689 2,717 Housing Foundation Contract 24,500 21,725 (2,775) 24,175 HRA Services 180,000 234,904 54,904 180,087 Assessing Searches 1,000 1,320 320 1,162 Park Registration 91,800 134,869 43,069 106,114 Other Fees 0 5,028 5,028 7,558 50th & France Assessment 11,000 11,000 0 11,000 Charges to other Funds 160,296 160,164 (132) 151,719 Total charges for service 1,683,096 2,024,518 341,422 2,010,532 Fines and forfeitures 479,000 967,421 488,421 794,710 Sale and rental of property 67,000 171,585 104,585 280,304 Other revenues: Investment Income 30,400 430,577 400,177 (267,839) Donations 1,000 0 (1,000) 500 Other revenue 25,000 9,803 (15,197) 2,085 Total other revenues 56,400 440,380 383,980 (265,254) Total revenues $ 18,805,154 20,599,774 1,794,620 19,710,434 Page 48 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA General Fund Schedule of Expenditures - Budget and Actual Year ended December 31, 2000 (with comparative actual amounts for year ended December 31, 1999) Planning: Personal services 218,620 2000 903 1999 Contractual services 25,100 3,848 Variance 28,751 Commodities 1,215 48 Favorable 310 Central services Budget Actual (unfavorable) Actual General government: 4,891 1,833 3,058 1,659 Mayor and council: 317,290 290,910 26,380 302,894 Personal services $ 27,500 27,451 49 25,687 Contractual services 3,900 4,000 (100) 4,051 Commodities 1,000 831 169 445 Central services 35,004 35,004 0 34,668 Total mayor and council 67,404 67,286 118 64,851 Administration: 7,140 46,474 (39,334) 4,349 Personal services 518,173 537,433 (19,260) 501,254 Contractual services 115,400 98,096 17,304 116,605 Commodities .1,900 2,550 (650) 1,940 Central services 151,896 151,896 0 141,288 Capital outlay 5,514 8,140 (2,626) 4,962 Total administration 792,883 798,115 (5,232) 766,049 Planning: Personal services 218,620 217,717 903 209,474 Contractual services 25,100 3,848 21,252 28,751 Commodities 1,215 48 1,167 310 Central services 67,464 67,464 0 62,700 Capital outlay 4,891 1,833 3,058 1,659 Total planning 317,290 290,910 26,380 302,894 Finance: Personal services 305,446 282,209 23,237 244,249 Contractual services 78,300 97,049 (18,749) 100,803 Commodities 600 1,326 (726) 840 Central services 87,408 87,408 0 78,900 Capital outlay 7,140 46,474 (39,334) 4,349 Total finance 478,894 514,466 (35,572) 429,141 Election: Personal services 100,173 92,702 7,471 8,678 Contractual services 13,200 5,077 8,123 312 Commodities 8,000 7,022 978 746 Central services 13,428 13,428 0 12,204 Capital outlay 10,200 3,913 6,287 0 Total election 145,001 122,142 22,859 21,940 Assessing Personal services 393,357 395,288 (1,931) 375,498 Contractual services 62,986 52,329 10,657 51,823 Commodities . 1,781 1,413 368 1,476 Central services 108,480 108,480 0 95,904 Capital outlay 14,500 43,451 (28,951) 4,173 Total assessing 581,104 600,961 (19,857) 528,874 Legal and court services: Contractual services 359,000 341,375 17,625 428,941 Total general government 2,741,576 2,735,255 6,321 2,542,690 Page 49 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA General Fund Schedule of Expenditures - Budget and Actual Year ended December 31, 2000 (with comparative actual amounts for year ended December 31, 1999) Fire protection: Personal services 2,196,752 2000 159,611 1999 Contractual services 182,315 215,511 Variance 212,638 Commodities 52,410 141,801 Favorable 140,272 Central services Budget Actual (unfavorable) Actual Public Safety: 166,872 156,704 10,168 117,098 Police protection: 3,153,109 3,105,917 47,192 2,976,474 Personal services 3,471,796 3,435,371 36,425 3,314,965 Contractual services 248,715 265,515 (16,800) 207,191 Commodities 44,577 61,259 (16,682) 51,306 Central services 1,127,328 1,127,328 0 1,142,160 Capital outlay 297,193 204,534 92,659 263,509 Total police protection 5,189,609 5,094,007 95,602 4,9791-131 Fire protection: Personal services 2,196,752 2,037,141 159,611 1,950,458 Contractual services 182,315 215,511 (33,196) 212,638 Commodities 52,410 141,801 (89,391) 140,272 Central services 554,760 554,760 0 556,008 Capital outlay 166,872 156,704 10,168 117,098 Total fire protection 3,153,109 3,105,917 47,192 2,976,474 Civil defense: Personal services 23,466 23,947 (481) 24,925 Contractual services 8,165 5,698 2,467 7,212 Commodities 1,216 1,366 (150) 1,338 Capital outlay 7,674 0 7,674 0 Total civil defense 40,521 31,011 9,510 33,475 Animal control: Personal services 40,242 38,747 1,495 34,771 Contractual services 7,171 4,465 2,706 11,178 Commodities 3,478 1,196 2,282 504 Central services 10,692 10,692 0 14,220 Capital outlay 6,342 0 6,342 22,901 Total animal control 67,925 55,100 12,825 83,574 Public Health: Personal services 192,750 178,003 14,747 176,796 Contractual services 192,005 190,980 1,025 192,432 Commodities 4,125 2,763 1,362 434 Central services 66,624 66,624 0 65,400 Capital outlay 6,160 207 5,953 2,643 Total public health 461,664 438,577 23,087 437,705 Inspections: Personal services 354,052 349;650 4,402 290,834 Contractual services 43,014 31,476 11,538 24,271 Commodities 4,667 3,763 904 6,508 Central services 98,304 98,304 0 90,852 Capital outlay 14,210 14,286 (76) 34,883 Total inspections 514,247 497,479 16,768 447,348 Total public safety 9,427,075 9,222,091 204,985 8,957,707 Page 50 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA General Fund Schedule of Expenditures - Budget and Actual Year ended December 31, 2000 (with comparative actual amounts for year ended December 31, 1999) Engineering: Personal services 382,088 2000 15,438 1999 Contractual services 28,200 30,152 Variance 58,214 Commodities 12,000 7,281 Favorable 7,875 Central services Budget Actual (unfavorable) Actual Public Works: 50,000 24,905 25,095 60,789 Administration: 604,192 560,892 43,300 603,464 Personal services 115,293 114,169 1,124 112,160 Contractual services 4,765 3,643 1,122 3,944 Commodities 0 749 (749) 800 Central services 34,920 34,920 0 33,792 Total administration 154,978 153,481 1,497 150,696 Engineering: Personal services 382,088 366,650 15,438 357,894 Contractual services 28,200 30,152 (1,952) 58,214 Commodities 12,000 7,281 4,719 7,875 Central services 131,904 131,904 0 118,692 Capital outlay 50,000 24,905 25,095 60,789 Total engineering 604,192 560,892 43,300 603,464 Supervision and overhead: Personal services 152,805 153,889 (1,084) 126,435 Contractual services 33,000 26,334 6,666 26,861 Commodities 1,000 208 792 25 Central services 428,832 428,832 0 418,656 Total supervision and overhead 615,637 609,263 6,375 571,977 Street Maintenance: Personal services 968,500 859,839 108,661 893,488 Contractual services 609,150 532,740 76,410 615,732 Commodities 476,500 445,079 31,421 462,445 Central services 535,668 535,668 0 507,672 Capital outlay 456,000 530,427 (74,427) 357,082 Total street maintenance 3,045,818 2,903,753 142,065 2,836,419 Total public works 4,420,625 4,227,389 193,237 4,162,556 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA General Fund Schedule of Expenditures - Budget and Actual Year ended December 31, 2000 (with comparative actual amounts for year ended December 31, 1999) Parks: Administration: Personal services Contractual services Commodities Central services Capital outlay Total administration Recreation: Personal services Contractual services Commodities Total recreation Maintenance: Personal services Contractual services Commodities Central services Capital outlay Total supervision and overhead Total parks 2000 Budget Actual Page 51 1999 Variance Favorable (unfavorable) Actual 395,223 379,976 15,247 363,046 26,495 26,784 (289) 26,344 18,844 13,994 4,850 19,758 116,064 116,054 10 114,300 4,370 5,230 (860) 3,353 560,996 542,038 18,957 526,801 99,135 93,925 5,210 95,424 18,778 12,273 6,505 13,766 31,486 29,781 1,705 35,559 149,399 135,979 13,420 144,749 $ 744,520 772,800 (28,280) 757,120 267,336 191,569 75,767 284,926 138,272 129,156 9,116 119,632 384,276 384,276 0 410,856 96,275 99,691 (3,416) 121,975 1,630,679 1,577,492 53,187 1,694,509 2,341,074 2,255,509 85,564 2,366,059 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA General Fund Schedule of Expenditures - Budget and Actual Year ended December 31, 2000 (with comparative actual amounts for year ended December 31, 1999) Unallocated general expenditures: Contingencies Contractual services Commodities Capital outlay Total contingencies City's share of special assessment Human Rights Commission Contractual services Total Human Rights Commission Fireworks Commodities Total fireworks Suburban Rate Authority Contractual services Total Suburban Rate Authority Familink Contractual services Total Familink Page 52 2000 1999 Variance Favorable Budget Actual (unfavorable) Actual 76,500 78,972 (2,472) 72,823 0 10,559 (10,559) 9,485 0 0 0 12,115 76,500 89,531 (13,031) 94,423 20,000 22,505 (2,505) 29,188 337,804 346,099 (8,295) 366,332 83,350 82,125 1,225 79,663 83,350 82,125 1,225 79,663 11,000 11,000 0 11,000 11,000 11,000 0 11,000 4,000 4,496 (496) 4,000 4,000 4,496 (496) 4,000 30,236 30,236 0 34,505 30,236 30,236 0 34,505 Regional Planning Commission Contractual services 21,218 21,218 0 20,357 Total Regional Planning Commission 21,218 21,218 0 20,357 Deer control Personal services Contractual services Commodities Total deer control Fire Station debt service Total unallocated general expenditures Central services Total expenditures 0 786 (786) 0 7,000 315 6,685 9,325 500 126 374 110 7,500 1,227 6,273 9,435 84,000 83,761 239 83,761 337,804 346,099 (8,295) 366,332 0 73,920 (73,920) (135,670) $ 19,268,154 18,860,263 407,891 18,259,674 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA General Fund Schedule of Central Services Expenditures - Budget and Actual Year ended December 31, 2000 (with comparative actual amounts for year ended December 31, 1999) General: Personal services Contractual services Commodities Capital outlay Total general City Hall: Personal services Contractual services Commodities Fixed charges Total City Hall Public Works building: Personal services Contractual services Commodities Fixed charges Capital outlay Total Public Works building Equipment operation: Personal services Contractual services Commodities Fixed charges Capital outlay Total equipment operation Total central services expenditures Less allocation to other activities Page 53 Net central services 0 73,920 (73,920) (135,670) 2000 1999 Variance Favorable Budget Actual (unfavorable) Actual $ 3,038,848 3,059,486 (20,638) 2,755,131 783,500 848,367 (64,867) 734,980 26,000 45,010 (19,010) 36,651 76,000 36,986 39,014 39,595 3,924,348 3,989,849 (65,501) 3,566,357 68,664 63,577 5,087 66,301 45,420 47,315 (1,895) 45,745 34,560 20,443 14,117 33,954 17,112 17,112 0 15,804 165,756 148,447 17,309 161,804 66,638 108,338 (41,700) 50,762 93,500 98,329 (4,829) 85,242 58,500 82,594 (24,094) 65,410 13,068 13,068 0 9,744 7,298 4,392 2,906 1,240 239,004 306,721 (67,717) 212,398 304,909 271,920 32,989 271,188 90,500 82,412 8,088 85,668 485,000 484,386 614 468,397 264,720. 264,720 0 243,516 27,223 5,769 21,454 199,166 1,172,352 1,109,207 63,145 1,267,935 5,501,460 5,554,224 (52,764) 5,208,494 5,501,460 5,480,304 21,156 5,344,164 Net central services 0 73,920 (73,920) (135,670) .Special RevenuefUnds- Page 54 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS Special revenue funds account for revenues derived from specific taxes or other earmarked revenue sources and are usually required by statute or local ordinance and /or resolution to finance particular functions, or activities of government. The City has the following special revenue funds: Community Development Block Grant Fund: This fund was established to account for funds received under Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974. Communications Fund: This fund was established to account for funds received from the franchise fee of the local cable television service. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Special Revenue Funds Combining Balance Sheet December 31, 2000 (with comparative totals for December 31, 1999) Community Development Block Grant Communications Assets Investments Accounts receivable Accrued interest receivable Due from other funds Due from other governments Total assets Liabilities and Fund Balance Liabilities: Accounts payable Salaries payable Due to other funds Due to other governments Total liabilities $ 0 0 0 0 1,650 $ 1,650 Fund balance: Unreserved - undesignated Total liabilities and fund balance $ 1,049,987 8 12,869 111,766 0 1,174,630 Page 55 Totals 2000 1999 1,049,987 8 12,869 111,766 1,650 1,176,280 934,892 721 10,947 2,000 1,915 950,475 0 22,419 22,419 5,823 0 1,207 1,207 0 1,650 0 1,650 1,861 0 3,087 3,087 0 1,650 26,713 28,363 7,684 0 1,147,917 1,147,917 942,791 1,650 1,174,630 1,176,280 950,475 Page 56 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Special Revenue Funds Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Year ended December 31, 2000 (with comparative totals for year ended December 31, 1999) Community Development Totals Block Grant Communications 2000 1999 Revenues: Franchise fees $ 0 336,678 336,678 297,866 Intergovernmental: Federal grants 42,231 0 42,231 46,241 Investment income 0 117,016 117,016 (17,047) Other revenue 0 3,617 3,617 0 Total revenues 42,231 457,311 499,542 327,060 Expenditures: Current: Other: Personal services 1,650 40,274 41,924 4,635 Contractual services 40,581 182,754 223,335 231,242 Commodities 0 4,323 4,323 4,475 Fixed charges 0 16,188 16,188 35,184 Capital outlay 0 8,646 8,646 56,812 Total expenditures 42,231 252,185 294,416 332,348 Excess of revenues over expenditures 0 205,126 205,126 (5,288) Fund balance- January 1 0 942,791 942,791 948,079 Fund balance- December 31 $ 0 1,147,917 1,147,917 942,791 Debt Service Funds ~ Page 57 DEBT SERVICE FUNDS The Debt Service Funds finance and account for the payment of principal and interest on the General Obligation Redevelopment, General Obligation Park Improvements and Tax Increment Bonds. Provisions are made in the City's general property tax levy for money sufficient to meet the general obligation debt. The Improvement Bond Redemption II Fund was established to finance and account for payment of principal and interest on special assessment bonds issued. Financing of this debt service comes primarily from special assessments levied against benefited properties. Page 58 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Debt Service Funds Combining Balance Sheet December 31, 2000 (with comparative totals for December 31, 1999) General Improvement Debt Bond Totals Assets Service Redemption II 2000 1999 Cash $ 75,751 0 75,751 344,335 Cash and investments with fiscal agents 15,726,593 0 15,726,593 0 Special assessments receivable: Current 0 32,839 32,839 25,146 Deferred 0 2,260,602 2,260,602 2,783,207 Bloomington 0 96,533 96,533 108,600 Taxes Receivable: Delinquent 15,542 0 15,542 12,971 Allowance for uncollectible taxes (15,542) 0 (15,542) (12,971) Due from other funds 742,698 158,834 901,532 422,726 Due from other governments 5,422 3,342 8,764 6,914 Total assets $ 16,550,464 2,552,150 19,102,614 3,690,928 Liabilities and Fund Balance Liabilities Due to other funds 0 0 0 366,606 Due to other governments 0 96,704 96,704 108,686 Deferred revenue 0 2,293,442 2,293,442 2,808,353 Total liabilities 0 2,390,146 2,390,146 3,283,645 Fund balance: Reserved for debt service 16,550,464 162,004 16,712,468 407,283 Total fund balance 16,550,464 162,004 16,712,468 407,283 Total liabilities and fund balance $ 16,550,464 2,552,150 19,102,614 3,690,928 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Debt Service Funds Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Year ended December 31, 2000 (with comparative totals for year ended December 31, 1999) Revenues: Taxes Special assessments Interest on funds held with fiscal agent Expenditures: Current: Other Debt service: Bond principal Interest and fiscal charges Total expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenue over expenditures Other financing sources (uses): Operating transfer in (out): HRA Construction fund Proceeds from sale of tax increment bonds Total other financing sources (uses) Excess (deficiency) of revenues and other financing sources over expenditures and other financing uses Fund balance - January 1 Fund balance - December 31 Page 59 General Improvement 5,778,574 5,646,647 Debt Bond Totals (999,867) Service Redemption II 2000 1999 23,916,378 0 23,916,378 $ 738,349 0 738,349 723,026 0 721,871 721,871 855,137 88,788 0 88,788 0 827,137 721,871 1,549,008 1,578,163 0 1,600 1,600 1,800 5,870,000 180,000 6,050,000 3,275,000 3,095,261 13,340 3,108,601 3,262,266 8,965,261 194,940 9,160,201 6,539,066 (8,138,124) 526,931 (7,611,193) (4,960,903) 5,778,574 0 5,778,574 5,646,647 0 0 0 (999,867) 18,137,804 0 18,137,804 0 23,916,378 0 23,916,378 4,646,780 15,778,254 526,931 16,305,185 (314,123) 772,210 (364,927) 407,283 721,406 $ 16,550,464 162,004 16,712,468 407,283 ;Capital.Project Funds Page 60 CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDS Capital Project Funds account for the resources expended to acquire assets- of a relatively permanent nature other than those financed by Enterprise Funds. Construction Fund: This fund is used to account for the various special assessment and state aid projects throughout the City. Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina Fund: This fund is used to account for revenues from several sources (property taxes, bond proceeds, investment earnings, etc.) that are designated for housing and redevelopment. Park Improvements Fund: This fund is used to account for projects funded by the 1996 referendum and financed by the General Obligation Park Improvements Series 199613 bond. Revolving Fund: This fund was established to provide financing for capital improvements as designated in the City's capital improvement budget. Assets Cash Investments Accounts receivable Accrued interest receivable Special assessments receivable: Delinquent Deferred Taxes receivable Due from other governments Total assets Liabilities and Fund Balance Liabilities: Accounts payable Salaries payable Contracts payable Due to other funds Due to other governments Taxes payable Deferred revenue Total liabilities Fund balance(deficit): Reserved for encumbrances Reserved for special projects Unreserved: Designated Unreserved- undesig nated Total fund balance (deficit) Total liabilities and fund balance Page 61 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Capital Project Funds Combining Balance Sheet December 31, 2000 (with comparative totals for December 31, 1999) 1,475 Housing and 39,439 614,621 399,501 0 Redevelopment 2,257 2,257 1,051 12,983 Authority of 108,175 Totals Construction Edina Revolving 2000 1999 $ 0 104,217 0. 104,217 19,180 0 16,314,568 9,359,100 25,673,668 23,641,218 0 0 26,653 26,653 11,664 0 228,168 88,312 316,480 236,501 0 0 1,946 1,946 1,982 0 0 983,163 983,163 143,200 0 0 0 0 7,647 0 150,847 2,486 153,333 1,274,638 $ 0 16,797,800 10,461,660 27,259,460 25,336,030 1,475 573,707 39,439 614,621 399,501 0 0 2,257 2,257 1,051 12,983 86,341 108,175 207,499 15,908 1,600,948 777,486 586,567 2,965,001 5,790,313 0 4,433 8,154 12,587 189 0 0 0 0 80,593 0 0 985,109 985,109 145,180 1,615,406 1,441,967 1,729,701 4,787,074 6,432,735 17,527 0 0 17,527 328 0 0 0 0 78,342 0 0 8,731,959 8,731,959 0 (1,632,933) 15,355,833 0 13,722,900 18,824,625 (1,615,406) 15,355,833 8,731,959 22,472,386 18,903,295 $ 0 16,797,800 10,461,660 27,259,460 25,336,030 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Capital Project Funds Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance (Deficit) Year ended December 31, 2000 (with comparative totals for year ended December 31, 1999) Revenues: Tax increments Special assessments Intergovernmental Charges for services Investment income Sale and rental of property Other revenues Total revenues Expenditures: Current: Other. Personal services Professional fees Other Construction costs Total expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenues over expenditures Other financing sources (uses): Operating transfers in (out): General fund Working capital /construction fund General debt service fund Liquor fund Proceeds from sale of bonds Total other financing sources (uses) Excess (deficiency) of revenues and other financing sources over expenditures and other financing uses Fund balance (deficit) - January 1, as restated Fund balance (deficit)- December 31 Page 62 0 Housing and 71,467 306,639 238,165 0 Redevelopment 90,845 384,578 190,556 0 Authority of 48,742 Totals 435,395 Construction Edina Revolving 2000 1999 $ 0 8,590,313 0 8,590,313 8,084,657 0 0 438,005 438,005 135,193 195,690 0 58,567 254,257 1,434,970 845,230 0 32,918 878,148 204,001 0 1,134,008 605,748 1,739,756 700,000 0 0 984,941 984,941 3,781 17,457 3,577 62,478 83,512 468,889 1,058,377 9,727,898 2,182,657 12,968,932 11,031,491 0 235,172 71,467 306,639 238,165 0 293,733 90,845 384,578 190,556 0 475,719 48,742 524,461 435,395 810,178 5,844,988 552,800 7,207,966 4,542,885 810,178 6,849,612 763,854 8,423,644 5,407,001 248,199 2,878,286 1,418,803 4,545,288 5,624,490 0 0 279,065 279,065 153,460 1,174,434 0 (1,174,434) 0 0 0 (5,778,574) 0 (5,778,574) (4,646,780) 0 0 919,000 919,000 0 0 3,604,312 0 3,604,312 0 1,174,434 (2,174,262) 23,631 (976,197) (4,493,320) 1,422,633 704,024 1,442,434 3,569,091 1,131,170 (3,038,039) 14,651,809 7,289,525 18,903,295 17,772,125 $ (1,615,406) 15,355,833 8,731,959 22,472,386 18,903,295 Enterprise Funds Page 63 ENTERPRISE FUNDS Enterprise Funds account for the financing of self supporting activities of governmental units which render services to the general public on a user charge basis. Records are maintained on the accrual basis of accounting. The reports of Enterprise Funds are similar to private enterprise and self - contained. Creditors, legislators or the .general public can evaluate the performance of the municipal enterprise on the same basis as investor -owned enterprises. The following Enterprise Funds were established to account for the operation of City - owned facilities: Utilities Fund Liquor Fund Swimming Pool Fund Golf Course Fund Arena Fund Art Center Fund Edinborough Park/Centennial Lake Fund All activities necessary to provide such services are accounted for in these funds, including, but not limited to, administration, operations, maintenance, financing, debt service, billing and collection. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Enterprise Funds Combining Balance Sheet December 31, 2000 (with comparative totals for December 31, 1999) Assets Current assets: Cash $ Petty cash and change funds Investments Cash with fiscal agents Receivables: Accounts Customers Interest Special Assessments Due from other funds Due from other governments I nventory Total current assets 0 0 4,580,148 0 0 2,170,225 43,672 76,457 179,441 4,527 88,204 7,142,674 Page 64 Swimming Liquor Pool 0 4,440 0 0 2,993 0 0 0 1,051,358 0 979,726 2,038,517 0 0 0 532,126 53 0 0 0 243,000 0 0 775,179 Advance to other funds 0 0 0 Property and equipment, net 25,892,008 614,161 1,860,344 Discounts on bonds 23,916 0 5,291 Total assets $ 33,058,598 2,652,678 2,640,814 Liabilities and Fund Equity 3,265,000 0 1,100,000 Current liabilities: 3,301,100 0 1,100,000 Accounts payable 338,137 241,058 2,017 Salaries payable 24,512 32,256 0 Contracts payable 94,563 0 0 Accrued interest payable 52,644 0 27,484 Due to other funds 0 0 0 Due to other governments 241,501 103,494 31 Compensated absences payable 146,057 78,922 0 Total current liabilities 897,414 455,730 29,532 Long -term liabilities: Deposits payable 36,100 0 0 Deferred revenue 0 0 0 Advance from other funds 0 0 0 Obligation under capital lease 0 0 0 Bonds payable 3,265,000 0 1,100,000 Total long -term liabilities 3,301,100 0 1,100,000 Total liabilities 4,198,514 455,730 1,129,532 Fund equity: Contributed capital 21,020 0 1,468,264 Retained earnings (deficit): Reserved for debt service 274,998 0 32,500 Unreserved - undesignated 28,564,066 2,196,948 10,518 Total retained earnings (deficit) 28,839,064 2,196,948 43,018 Total liabilities and fund equity $ 33,058,598 2,652,678 2,640,814 Page 65 Golf Art Edinborough Park Totals Course Arena Center Centennial Lake 2000 1999 0 0 0 0 0 1,503 4,400 700 275 1,500 11,315 11,265 0 0 0 0 4,580,148 1,759,670 2,750,600 2,952 0 820 3,286,498 3,306,034 2,459 108,636 0 374 114,515 109,903 0 0 0 0 2,170,225 2,010,560 0 0 0 63,314 106,986 56,313 0 0 0 0 76,457 105,212 54,973 568 8,618 22,432 1,560,390 4,809,711 0 0 0 0 4,527 5,212 82,111 0 15,493 0 1,165,534 981,068 2,894,543 112,856 24,386 88,440 13,076,595 13,156,451 0 0 0 0 0 145,012 7,145,696 4,602,406 445,497 793,827 41,353,939 40,376,037 41,043 9,204 0 0 79,454 97,273 10,081,282 4,724,466 469,883 882,267 54,509,988 53,774,773 61,716 39,683 16,743 26,474 725,828 632,025 26,544 14,902 4,843 17,824 120,881 104,259 0 0 0 0 94,563 13,170 201,130 46,105 0 0 327,363 401,692 0 0 0 0 0 200,000 5,611 350 735 3,959 355,681 155,320 164,171 68,440 30,405 78,099 566,094 144,466 459,172 169,480 52,726 126,356 2,190,410 1,650,932 10,993 3,500 0 0 50,593 12,354 0 5,040 0 0 5,040 5,040 0 0 0 0 0 145,012 16,800 151,200 0 42,000 210,000 260,000 7,760,000 1,660,000 0 0 13,785,000 14,570,000 7,787,793 1,819,740 0 42,000 14,050,633 14,992,406 8,246,965 1,989,220 52,726 168,356 16,241,043 16,643,338 2,800 3,286,798 291,926 654,193 5,725,001 6,177,967 1,115,031 184,591 0 0 1,607,120 1,607,120 716,486 (736,143) 125,231 59,718 30,936,824 29,346,348 1,831,517 (551,552) 125,231 59,718 32,543,944 30,953,468 10,081,282 4,724,466 469,883 882,267 54,509,988 53,774,773 Page 66 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Enterprise Funds Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings (Deficit) December 31, 2000 (with comparative totals for December 31, 1999) Operating expenses: Cost of sales and services 102,855 6,663,033 Swimming Personal services Utilities Liquor Pool Operating revenues: 4,378,399 221,260 89,917 Charges for sales and services: 505,674 51,094 45,892 Sales - Liquor $ 0 8,989,480 0 Sales - Retail 0 0 196 Sales - Utility 8,639,374 0 0 Sales - Concessions 0 0 73,625 Memberships 0 0 373,798 Admissions 0 0 150,091 Building rental 0 0 15,397 Rental of equipment 0 0 0 Greens fees 0 0 0 Otherfees 154,012 0 23,858 Total operating revenues 8,793,386 8,989,480 636,965 Operating expenses: Cost of sales and services 102,855 6,663,033 21,756 Personal services 893,746 768,795 183,178 Contractual services 4,378,399 221,260 89,917 Commodities 505,674 51,094 45,892 Central services 455,544 243,612 25,464 Depreciation 866,758 57,609 150,519 Total operating expenses 7,202,976 8,005,403 516,726 Operating income (loss) 1,590,410 984,077 120,239 Nonoperating revenues (expenses): Investment income 159,569 0 22,201 Donations 0 0 0 Miscellaneous revenue (expense) 110 243 45 Interest and fiscal charges (127,525) 0 (55,425) Interest on capital lease 0 0 0 Gain (loss) on disposal of capital assets (58,299) (23,187) (37,752) Amortization of bond discount (2,958) 0 (1,962) Total nonoperating revenues (expenses) (29,103) (22,944) (72,893) Income (loss) before operating transfers 1,561,307 961,133 47,346 Operating transfers in (out): General fund 0 0 0 Art center fund 0 (139,000) 0 Liquor store fund 0 0 0 Golf Course fund 0 0 0 Arena fund 0 (81,000) 0 Revolving fund 0 (919,000) 0 Total operating transfers, net 0 (1,139,000) 0 Net income (loss) 1,561,307 (177,867) 47,346 Add depreciation on contributed assets 443 0 96,033 Increase (decrease) in retained earnings 1,561,750 (177,867) 143,379 Retained earnings (deficit) - January 1 27,277,314 2,374,815 (100,361) Retained earnings (deficit) - December 31 $ 28,839,064 2,196,948 43,018 Page 67 Golf Art Edinborough Park Totals Course Arena Center Centennial Lake 2000 1999 0 0 0 0 8,989,480 8,423,812 347,017 24,720 40,540 0 412,473 376,148 0 0 0 0 8,639,374 8,378,216 297,666 0 0 25,062 396,353 391,037 157,155 5,218 26,629 21,179 583,979 520,848 271,716 82,745 0 58,155 562,707 581,044 67,467 908,657 0 198,650 1,190,171 1,129,746 338,021 7,268 0 53,760 399,049 377,198 1,974,991 0 0 181,447 2,156,438 2,046,256 499,975 108,349 315,543 433,946 1,535,683 1,332,433 3,954,008 1,136,957 382,712 972,199 24,865,707 23,556,738 340,722 65 35,810 10,643 7,174,884 6,704,254 1,461,937 447,206 225,619 665,159 4,645,640 4,147,974 459,641 382,772 187,868 363,495 6,083,352 5,536,401 310,035 60,824 64,320 158,701 1,196,540 1,033,585 275,808 99,240 62,465 202,368 1,364,501 1,293,228 508,189 321,095 56,032 171,869 2,132,071 2,103,687 3,356,332 1,311,202 632,114 1,572,235 22,596,988 20,819,129 597,676 (174,245) (249,402) (600,036) 2,268,719 2,737,609 114,840 0 0 322,663 619,273 408,055 0 0 21,352 0 21,352 17,283 170 0 0 87 655 67,293 (405,548) (92,989) 0 0 (681,487) (605,479) (1,049) (9,440) 0 (2,622) (13,111) (15,511) (34,983) (11,353) (35,476) (48,022) (249,072) 27,636 (11,749) (1,150) 0 0 (17,819) (16,341) (338,319) (114,932) (14,124) 272,106 (320,209) (117,064) 259,357 (289,177) (263,526) (327,930) 1,948,510 2,620,545 0 0 0 108,000 108,000 23,000 0 0 0 0 (139,000) (155,000) 0 81,000 139,000 0 220,000 680,000 0 0 0 0 0 35,000 0 0 0 0 (81,000) (560,000) 0 0 0 0 (919,000) 0 0 81,000 139,000 108,000 (811,000) 23,000 259,357 (208,177) (124,526) (219,930) 1,137,510 2,643,545 800 187,352 18,375 149,963 452,966 448,134 260,157 (20,825) (106,151) (69,967) 1,590,476 3,091,679 1,571,360 (530,727) 231,382 129,685 30,953,468 27,861,789 1,831,517 (551,552) 125,231 59,718 32,543,944 30,953,468 Cash flows from noncapital financing activities: Donations 0 0 Page 68 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA 0 145,012 0 Enterprise Funds 0 0 0 Combining Statement of Cash Flows 0 0 0 December 31, 2000 0 (139,000) 0 (with comparative totals for year ended December 31, 1999) 0 0 0 Operating transfer in —Golf Course Fund 0 Swimming Cash flows from operating activities: Utilities Liquor Pool Operating income $ 1,590,410 984,077 120,239 Adjustments to reconcile operating income Net cash provided used for noncapital financing activities 0 (993,988) to net cash provided by operating activities Cash flows from investing activities: Depreciation expense 866,758 57,609 150,519 Changes in assets and liabilities: Decrease in interest receivable (43,672) 0 (Increase) decrease in accounts receivable 0 (2,993) (53) (Increase) decrease in customer accounts receivable (159,665) 0 0 (Increase) decrease in special assessments receivable 28,755 0 0 (Increase) decrease in due from other funds 3,387,000 94,144 (190,033) (Increase) decrease in due from. other governments 685 0 0 (Increase) decrease in inventory (65,447) (98,963) 0 Increase (decrease) in accounts payable 183,343 (104,557) 1,558 Increase in salaries payable 2,556 3,447 0 Increase (decrease) in contracts payable 81,393 0 0 Increase (decrease) in accrued interest payable (38,964) 0 (4,175) Decrease in due to other funds 0 0 0 Increase (decrease) in due to other governments 208,029 (1,091) (58) Increase in compensated absences payable 110,946 62,072 0 Increase in deposits payable 36,100 0 0 Miscellaneous revenue 110 243 45 Total adjustments 4,641,599 9,911 (42,197) Net cash provided by operating activities 6,232,009 993,988 78,042 Cash flows from noncapital financing activities: Donations 0 0 0 Increase (decrease) in advance to other funds 0 145,012 0 Increase (decrease) in advance from other funds 0 0 0 Operating transfer in (out) — General Fund 0 0 0 Operating transfer (out) -Art Center 0 (139,000) 0 Operating transfer in— Liquor Store Fund 0 0 0 Operating transfer in —Golf Course Fund 0 0 0 Operating transfer (out) -Arena 0 (81,000) 0 Operating transfer (out)—Revolving fund 0 (919,000) 0 Net cash provided used for noncapital financing activities 0 (993,988) 0 Cash flows from capital and related financing activities: Net acquisition of capital assets (3,006,604) 23,187 9,459 Gain (loss) on disposal of capital assets (58,299) (23,187) (37,752) Proceeds from revenue bonds 0 0 0 Principal paid on revenue bonds (335,000) 0 (20,000) Increase on bond discount 0 0 0 Principal paid on capital lease 0 0 0 Interest received from fiscal agent 0 0 22,201 Interest paid on capital lease 0 0 0 Interest paid on bonds (127,525) 0 (55,425) Net cash (used) provided for capital and related financing activities (3,527,428) 0 (81,517) Cash flows from investing activities: Purchase of investments (2,820,478) 0 0 Decrease in interest receivable (43,672) 0 0 Investment income 159,569 0 0 Net cash used by investing activities (2,704,581) - 0 0 Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 0 0 (3,475) Cash and equivalents, beginning of year 0 4,440 535,601 Cash and equivalents, end of year 0 4,440 532,126 Supplemental disclosure of noncash noncapital financing activity: Contribution of fixed assets 0 0 0 Total noncash noncapital financing activity $ 0 0 0 Page 69 Golf Art Edinborough Park Totals Course Arena Center Centennial Lake 2000 1999 597,676 (174,245) (249,402) (600,036) 2,268,719 2,776,274 508,189 321,095 56,032 171,869 2,132,071 2,103,687 6,833 (8,025) 0 55,939 51,701 (72,651) 0 0 0 0 (159,665) 72,776 0 0 0 0 28,755 (58,820) (54,973) 2,146 11,648 (611) 3,249,321 (4,052,705) 0 0 0 0 685 (4,554) (20,219) 0 163 0 (184,466) 1,181 17,101 4,917 3,557 (12,116) 93,803 (22,390) 2,459 7,949 87 124 16,622 17,877 0 0 0 0 81,393 (63,395) (28,448) (2,742) 0 0 (74,329) 163,103 (200,000) 0 0 0 (200,000) (50,000) 437 (8,729) (285) 2,058 200,361 (211,516) 122,028 53,571 20,610 52,401 421,628 11,513 2,139 0 0 0 38,239 5,502 170 0 0 87 655 23,921 355,716 370,182 91,812 269,751 5,696,774 (2,136,471) 953,392 195,937 (157,590) (330,285) 7,965,493 639,803 0 0 21,352 0 21,352 35,189 0 0 0 0 145,012 808,417 (145,012) 0 0 0 (145,012) (808,417) 0 0 0 108,000 108,000 23,000 0 0 0 0 (139,000) (155,000) 0 81,000 139,000 0 220,000 680,000 0 0 0 0 0 35,000 0 0 (81,000) (560,000) 0 0 0 0 (919,000) 0 (145,012) 81,000 160,352 108,000 (789,648) 58,189 (166,150) (25,238) 32,764 22,609 (3,109,973) (1,398,226) (34,983) (11,353) (35,476) (48,022) (249,072) 27,636• 0 0 0 0 0 6,870,000 (330,000) (100,000) 0 0 (785,000) (850,000) 0 0 0 0 0 (54,368) (4,000) (36,000) 0 (10,000) (50,000) (50,000) 114,840 0 0 0 137,041 68,275 (1,049) (9,440) 0 (2,622) (13,111) (15,511) (405,548) (92,989) 0 0 (681,487) (605,479) (826,890) (275,020) (2,712) (38,035) (4,751,602) 3,992,327 0 0 0 0 (2,820,478) (1,759,670) 0 0 0 (63,314) (106,986) 48,674 0 0 0 322,663 482,232 326,581 0 0 0 259,349 (2,445232) (1,384,415) (18,510) 1,917 50 (971) (20,989) 3,305,904 2,773,510 1,735 225 3,291 3,318,802 12,898 2,755,000 3,652 275 2,320 3,297,813 3,318,802 0 0 0 0 0 8,181 0 0 0 0 0 8,181 Page 70 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Utilities Fund Balance Sheet December 31, 2000 (with comparative amounts for December 31, 1999) Assets Current assets: Investments Receivables: Customers Interest Assessments Due from other funds Due from other governments Inventory Total current assets Property and equipment, net Discount on bonds Total assets Liabilities and Retained Earnings Current liabilities: Accounts payable Salaries payable Contracts payable Accrued interest payable Due to other governments Compensated absences payable Total current liabilities Long -term liabilities: Deposits payable Bonds payable Total liabilities Fund equity: Contributed capital Retained earnings: Reserved for debt service Unreserved -- undesignated Total retained earnings 2000 1999 $ 4,580,148 2,170,225 43,672 76,457 179,441 4,527 88,204 7,142,674 1,759,670 2,010,560 0 105,212 3,566,441 5,212 22,757 7,469,852 25,892,008 23,752,161 23,916 26,874 $ 33,058,598 31,248,887 338,137 24,512 94,563 52,644 241,501 146,057 897,414 36,100 3,265,000 4,198,514 21,020 274,998 28, 564,066 28,839,064 154,794 21,956 13,170 91,608 33,472 35,111 350,111 0 3,600,000 3,950,111 21,462 274,998 27,002,316 27,277,314 Total liabilities and retained earnings $ 33,058,598 31,248,887 Page 71 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Utilities Fund Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings Year ended December 31, 2000 (with comparative amounts for year ended December 31, 1999) Operating expenses: Cost of sales and services 2000 1999 Operating revenues: 893,746 754,731 Storm sewer charges $ 581,654 577,884 Water charges 2,909,622 2,597,734 Sewer charges 4,636,860 4,682,113 Recycling 495,300 494,126 Sale of meters 15,938 26,359 Other 368,637 354,949 Penalties 82,802 52,228 State Health 71,210 71,979 Total operating revenues 8,793,386 8,502,423 Operating expenses: Cost of sales and services 102,855 63,608 Personal services 893,746 754,731 Contractual services General costs 949,182 1,020,170 Recycling charges 455,222 421,109 Disposal charges 2,973,995 2,639,687 Commodities General costs 368,637 354,949 Water purchased 137,037 126,209 Central services .455,544 481,728 Depreciation 866,758 849,381 Total operating expenses 7,202,976 6,711,572 Operating income 1,590,410 1,790,851 Nonoperating revenues (expenses): Investment income 159,569 60,454 Miscellaneous revenue (expense) 110 1,650 Interest and fiscal charges (127,525) (83,429) Loss on disposal of capital assets (58,299) 0 Amortization of bond discount (2,958) (2,101) Total nonoperating expenses (29,103) (23,426) Net income 1,561,307 1,767,425 Add depreciation on contributed assets 443 443 Increase in retained earnings 1,561,750 1,767,868 Retained earnings -- January 1 27,277,314 25,509,446 Retained earnings -- December 31 $ 28,839,064 27,277,314 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Utilities Fund Statement of Cash Flows Year ended December 31, 2000 (with comparative amounts for year ended year ended December 31,1999) Cash flows from operating activities: Operating income Adjustments to reconcile operating income to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation expense Changes in assets and liabilities: (Increase) decrease in customer accounts receivable (Increase) decrease in assessments receivable (Increase) decrease in due from other funds (Increase) decrease in due from other governments (Increase) decrease in inventory Increase (decrease) in accounts payable Increase in salaries payable Increase (decrease) in contracts payable Increase (decrease) in accrued interest payable Increase (decrease) in due to other governments Increase (decrease) in compensated absences payable Increase in deposits payable Miscellaneous revenue Total adjustments Net cash provided (used) by operating activities Cash flows from noncapital financing activities: Decrease in advance to other funds Net cash provided by noncapital financing activities Cash flows from capital and related financing activities: Net acquisition of capital assets Loss on disposal of capital assets Proceeds on revenue bonds Principal paid on revenue bonds Increase on bond discount Interest paid on bonds Net cash provided (used) by capital financing activities Cash flows from investing activities: Purchase of investments Increase of interest receivable Investment income Net cash used by investing activities Net increase in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year Cash and cash equivalents, end of year Page 72 2000 1999 $ 1,590,410 1,790,851 866,758 (159,665) 28,755 3,387,000 685 (65,447) 183,343 2,556 81,393 (38,964) 208,029 110,946 36,100 110 4,641,599 6,232,009 0 0 (3,006,604) (58,299) 0 (335,000) 0 (127,525) (3,527,428) (2,820,478) (43,672) 159,569 (2,704,581) 849,381 72,776 (58,820) (3,371,663) (4,554) 7,788 (2,306) 4,501 (63,395) 83,067 (223,497) 1,765 0 1,650 (2,703,307) (912,456) 479,539 479,539 (935,592) 0 3,600,000 (420,000) (28,846) (83,429) 2,132,133 (1,759,670) 0 60,454 (1,699,216) 0 0 0 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Liquor Fund Balance Sheet . December 31, 2000 (with comparative amounts for December 31, 1999) Assets Current assets: Petty cash and change funds Accounts receivable Due from other funds Inventory Total current assets Advance to other funds Property and equipment, net Total assets Liabilities and Retained Earnings Current liabilities: Accounts payable Salaries payable Due to other governments Compensated absences payable Total current liabilities Retained earnings: Unreserved — undesignated Total liabilities and retained earnings 2000 1999 $ 4,440 2,993 1,051,358 979,726 2,038,517 0 614,161 $ 2,652,678 4,440 0 1,145,502 880,763 2,030,705 145,012 694,957 2,870,674 241,058 345,615 32,256 28,809 103,494 104,585 78,922 16,850 455,730 495,859 2,196,948 2,374,815 $ 2,652,678 2,870,674 Page 73 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Liquor Fund Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings Year ended December 31, 2000 (with comparative totals for year ended December 31, 1999) Operating revenues: Sales - Liquor Deposits /refunds Liquor Wine Beer Miscellaneous Total operating revenues Operating expenses: Cost of sales and services Personal services Contractual services Commodities Central services Depreciation Total operating expenses Operating income Nonoperating revenues (expenses): Miscellaneous revenue (expense) Loss on disposal of capital assets Total nonoperating revenues (expenses) Income before operating transfer out Operating transfer out: Art Center Operating transfer out: Arena Operating transfer out: Revolving fund Net income (loss) Retained earnings -- January 1 Page 74 2000 1999 $ 665 2,558,895 3,650,130 2,491,806 287,984 8,989,480 6,663,033 768,795 221,260 51,094 243,612 57,609 8,005,403 984,077 3,414 2,429,192 3,329,113 2,382,608 279,487 8,423,814 6,260,968 694,571 181,838 38,420 242,472 55,935 7,474,204 949,610 243 (1,184) (23,187) (2,880) (22,944) (4,064) 961,133 945,546 (139,000) (81,000) (919,000) (1,139,000) (155,000) (525,000) 0 (680,000) (177,867) 265,546 2,374,815 2,109,269 Retained earnings — December 31 $ 2,196,948 2,374,815 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Liquor Fund Statement of Cash Flows Year ended December 31, 2000 (with comparative amounts for year ended December 31, 1999) Cash flows from operating activities: Operating income Adjustments to reconcile operating income to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation expense Changes in assets and liabilities: (Increase) decrease in accounts receivable (Increase) decrease in due from other funds Increase in inventory Increase (decrease) in accounts payable Increase in salaries payable Increase (decrease) in due to other governments Increase in compensated absences payable Miscellaneous revenue (expense) Total adjustments Net cash provided by operating activities Cash flows from noncapital financing activities: Decrease in advance to other funds Operating transfer (out )—Art Center Operating transfer (out)—Revolving fund Operating transfer (out )—Arena Net cash used by noncapital financing activities Cash flows from capital and related financing activities: Acquisition of capital assets Loss on disposal of capital assets Net cash used by capital financing activities Net increase in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year Page 75 2000 1999 984,077 949,730 57,609 55,935 (2,993) 611 94,144 (671,309) (98,963) (6,382) (104,557) 38,523 3,447 9,796 (1,091) 10,759 62,072 4,155 243 (1,304) 9,911 (559,216) 993,988 390,514 145,012 328,878 (139,000) (155,000) (81,000) 0 (919,000) (525,000) (993,988) (351,122) 23,187 (36,412) (23,187) (2,880) 0 (39,292) 100 4,440 4,340 Cash and cash equivalents, end of year $ 4,440 4,440 Page 76 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Liquor Fund Schedule of Revenue and Operating Expenses by Location Year ended December 31, 2000 (with comparative amounts for year ended December 31, 1999) Occupancy: Personal services 1,016 5,975 2,542 Totals 7,704 Contractual services 50th Street Yorkdale Vernon 2000 1999 Operating revenues: 1,736 2,338 3,347 7,421 6,924 Sales - Liquor 20,881 23,385 13,343 57,609 55,935 Deposits /refunds $ 98 305 262 665 3,414 Liquor 424,775 1,229,522 904,598 2,558,895 2,429,192 Wine 835,591 1,653,654 1,160,885 3,650,130 3,329,113 Beer 453,403 1,240,309 798,094 2,491,806 2,382,608 Miscellaneous 54,220 129,904 103,860 287,984 279,487 Total operating revenues 1,768,087 4,253,694 2,967,699 8,989,480 8,423,814 Operating expenses: Selling: Cost of sales and services 1,297,385 3,153,799 2,211,849 6,663,033 6,260,968 Personal services 112,591 201,012 149,158 462,761 447,601 Contractual services 9,995 10,491 13,419 33,905 14,723 Commodities 5,342 10,452 4,503 20,297 23,856 Total selling 1,425,313 3,375,754 2,378,929 7,179,996 6,747,148 Occupancy: Personal services 1,016 5,975 2,542 9,533 7,704 Contractual services 19,959 42,263 17,255 79,477 75,921 Commodities 1,736 2,338 3,347 7,421 6,924 Depreciation 20,881 23,385 13,343 57,609 55,935 Total occupancy 43,592 73,961 36,487 154,040 146,484 Administrative: Personal services 79,631 113,208 103,662 296,501 239,266 Contractual services 25,130 50,496 32,252 107,878 91,194 Commodities 6,977 9,275 7,124 23,376 7,640 Central services 62,004 95,160 86,448 243,612 242,472 Total administrative 173,742 268,139 229,486 671,367 580,572 Total operating expenses 1,642,647 3,717,854 2,644,902 8,005,403 7,474,204 Operating income $ 125,440 535,840 322,797 984,077 949,610 Page 77 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Swimming Pool Fund Balance Sheet December 31, 2000 (with comparative amounts for December 31, 1999) Assets Current assets: Cash with fiscal agents Accounts receivable Due from other funds Total current assets Property and equipment, net Discount on bonds Total assets Liabilities and Retained Earnings Current liabilities: Accounts payable Accrued interest payable Due to other governments Total current liabilities Long -term liabilities Bonds payable Total liabilities Fund equity: Contributed capital Retained earnings: Reserved for debt service Unreserved — undesignated Total retained earnings (deficit) 2000 1999 $ 532,126 535,601 53 0 243,000 52,967 775,179 588,568 1,860,344 2,020,323 5,291 7,253 $ 2,640,814 2,616,144 2,017 459 27,484 31,659 31 89 29,532 32,207 1,100,000 1,120,000 1,129,532 1,152,207 1,468,264 1,564,298 32,500 32,500 10,518 (132,861) 43,018 (100,361) Total liabilities and fund equity $ 2,640,814 2,616,144 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Swimming Pool Fund Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings (Deficit) Year ended December 31, 2000 (with comparative amounts for year ended December 31, 1999) Operating revenues: Sales - retail Sales - concessions Memberships Admissions Building rental Otherfees Lessons Total operating revenues Operating expenses: Cost of sales and services Personal services Contractual services Commodities Central services Depreciation Total operating expenses Operating income Nonoperating revenue (expenses): Investment income Miscellaneous revenue Interest and fiscal charges Loss on disposal of capital assets Amortization of bond discount Total nonoperating expenses Income before operating transfers Operating Transfer out -- General fund Net income (loss) Add depreciation on contributed assets Increase (decrease) in retained earnings Retained earnings (deficit) -- January 1 Retained earnings (deficit) -- December 31 2000 $ 196 73,625 373,798 150,091 15,397 23,858 636,965 21,756 183,178 89,917 45,892 25,464 150,519 516,726 120,239 22,201 45 (55,425) (37,752) (1,962) (72,893) 47,346 I 47,346 1999 0 76,898 326,114 129,662 15,381 24,150 572,205 22,102 178,017 74,175 27,086 17,844 150,879 470,103 102,102 13,199 0 (47,362) (9,876) (1,861) (45,900) 56,202 (183,000) (126,798) 96,033 106,669 143,379 (20,129) (100,361) (80,232) $ 43,018 (100,361) Page 78 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Swimming Pool Fund Statement of Cash Flows Year ended December 31, 2000 (with comparative amounts for year ended December 31, 1999) Cash flows from operating activities: Operating income Adjustments to reconcile operating income to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation expense Changes in assets and liabilities: Increase in accounts receivable Increase (decrease) in due from other funds Increase in accounts payable Increase (decrease) in accrued interest payable Increase (decrease) in due to other governments Miscellaneous revenue Total adjustments Net cash provided by operating activities Cash flows from noncapital financing activities: Operating transfer out - General Fund Net cash used by noncapital financing activities Cash flows from capital and related financing activities: Net acquisition of capital assets Loss on disposal of capital assets Proceeds from revenue bonds Principal paid on revenue bonds Increase on bond discount Interest received from fiscal agent Interest paid on bonds Net cash provided (used) by capital and related financing activities Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year Cash and cash equivalents, end of year Page 79 2000 1999 $ 120,239 102,102 150,519 (53) (190,033) 1,558 (4,175) (58) 45 (42,197) 78,042 150,879 0 12,459 172 14,045 33 0 177,588 279,690 0 (183,000) 0 (183,000) 9,459 (22,914) (37,752) (9,876) 0 530,000 (20,000) (20,000) 0 (4,136) 22,201 13,199 (55,425) (47,362) (81,517) 438,911 (3,475) 535,601 535,601 0 $ 532,126 535,601 Page 80 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Golf Course Fund Balance Sheet December 31, 2000 (with comparative amounts for December 31, 1999) Assets Current assets: Petty cash and change funds Cash with fiscal agents Accounts receivable Due from other funds Inventory Total current assets Property and equipment, net Discount on bonds Total assets Liabilities and Retained Earnings Current liabilities: Accounts payable Salaries payable Accrued interest payable Due to other funds Due to other governments Compensated absences payable Total current liabilities Long -term liabilities: Deposits payable Advance from other funds Obligation under capital lease Bonds payable Total liabilities Fund Equity: Contributed capital Retained earnings: Reserved for debt service Unreserved -- undesignated Total retained earnings 2000 $ 4,400 2,750,600 2,459 54,973 82,111 2,894,543 1999 4,400 2,769,110 9,292 0 61,892 2,844,694 7,145,696 7,487,735 41,043 52,792 $ 10,081,282 10,385,221 61,716 26,544 201,130 0 5,611 164,171 459,172 10,993 0 16,800 7,760,000 8,246,965 r m 1,115,031 716,486 1,831,517 44,615 24,085 229,578 200,000 5,174 42,143 545,595 8,854 145,012 20,800 8,090,000 8,810,261 3,600 1,115,031 456,329 1,571,360 Total liabilities and retained earnings $ 10,081,282 10,385,221 Page 81 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA 340,722 Golf Course Fund Personal services 1,461,937 Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings Contractual services Year ended December 31, 2000 458,998 (with comparative amounts for year ended December 31, 1999) 310,035 234,713 2000 1999 Operating revenues: Depreciation 508,189 Sales - retail Total operating expenses 3,356,332 Pro shop $ 338081 286,508 Miscellaneous 8,936 11,636 Sales - concessions 297,666 297,864 Memberships 157,155 141,989 Admissions 271,716 319,414 Building rental 67,467 71,698 Rental of equipment Gain (loss) on disposal of capital assets (34,983) Golf cars 304,929 300,922 Golf carts/clubs 30,776 32,756 Miscellaneous equipment 2,316 1,007 Green fees 1,974,991 1,903,497 Otherfees 0 Driving range 424,198 359,362 Lessons 72,429 58,241 Miscellaneous 3,348 2,795 Total operating revenues 3,954,008 3,787,689 Operating expenses: Cost of sales and services 340,722 318,706 Personal services 1,461,937 1,251,398 Contractual services 459,641 458,998 Commodities 310,035 234,713 Central services 275,808 241,704 Depreciation 508,189 501,406 Total operating expenses 3,356,332 3,006,925 Operating income 597,676 780,764 Nonoperating revenues (expenses): Investment income 114,840 68,275 Miscellaneous revenue 170 43,266 Interest and fiscal charges (405,548) (376,469) Interest on capital lease (1,049) (1,241) Gain (loss) on disposal of capital assets (34,983) 40,939 Amortization of bond discount (11,749) (11,228) Total nonoperating expenses (338,319) (236,458) Income before operating transfers 259,357 544,306 Operating transfer out - Arena 0 (35,000) 0 (35,000) Net income 259,357 509,306 Add depreciation on contributed assets 800 400 Increase in retained earnings 260,157 509,706 Retained eamings- January 1 1,571,360 1,061,654 Retained earnings-December 31 $ 1,831,517 1,571,360 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Golf Course Fund Statement of Cash Flows Year ended December 31, 2000 (with comparative amounts for year ended December 31, 1999) Cash flows from operating activities: Operating income Adjustments to reconcile operating income to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation expense Changes in assets and liabilities: (Increase) decrease in accounts receivable Increase in due from other funds (Increase) decrease in inventory Increase (decrease) in accounts payable Increase in salaries payable Increase (decrease) in accrued interest payable Decrease in due to other funds Increase (decrease) in due to other governments Increase in compensated absences payable Increase in deposits payable Miscellaneous revenue Total adjustments Net cash provided by operating activities Cash flow from noncapital financing activities: Decrease in advance from other funds Operating transfer out - Arena fund Net cash used by noncapital financing activities Cash flow from capital and related financing activities: Net acquisition of capital assets Gain (loss) on disposal of capital assets Proceeds from revenue bonds Principal paid on revenue bonds Decrease on bond discount Principal paid on capital lease Interest received from fiscal agent Interest paid on capital lease Interest paid on bonds Net cash provided (used) by capital and related financing activities Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year Cash and cash equivalents, end of year 2000 Page 82 1999 597,676 780,764 508,189 6,833 (54,973) (20,219) 17,101 2,459 (28,448) (200,000) 437 122,028 2,139 170 355,716 953,392 (145,012) 0 (145,012) (166,150) (34,983) 0 (330,000) 0 (4,000) 114,840 (1 ,049) (405,548) (826,890) (18,510) 501,406 (2,322) 0 157 (42,930) 483 68,451 0 (1,536) 3,476 5,502 43,266 575,953 1,356,717 (328,878) (35,000) (363,878) (359,941) 40,939 2,740,000 (310,000) (21,386) (4,000) 68,275 (1,241) (376,469) 1,776,177 2,769,016 2,773,510 4,494 2,755,000 2,773,510 Supplemental disclosure of noncash noncapital financing activity: Contribution of fixed assets 0 4,000 Total noncash noncapital financing activity $ 0 4,000 Page 83 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Golf Course Fund Schedule of Operating Expenses Year ended December 31, 2000 (with comparative amounts for year ended December 31, 1999) Clubhouse Personal services 2000 1999 Administration 81,651 78,191 Personal services $ 921,268 756,387 Contractual services 243,394 257,765 Commodities 155,419 137,925 Central services 257,292 224,088 Total administration 1,577,373 1,376,165 Clubhouse Personal services 38,060 35,809 Contractual services 81,651 78,191 Commodities 16,649 16,479 Total clubhouse 136,360 130,479 Grill: 290,379 270,915 Cost of sales and services 105,075 103,643 Personal services 94,710 84,537 Contractual services 13,332 8,452 Commodities 21,997 25,680 Total grill 235,114 222,312 Golf Cars: 18,516 17,616 Personal services 34,880 34,946 Contractual services 9,697 7,394 Commodities 17,701 0 Total range and grill 62,278 42,340 Range: Personal services 129,997 105,113 Contractual services 706 1,705 Commodities 44,110 9,846 Total range and grill 174,813 116,664 Richards: Cost of sales and services 8,467 8,060 Personal services 107,246 91,881 Contractual services 12,439 14,663 Commodities 15,343 20,040 Total Richards 143,495 134,644 Pro Shop Cost of sales and services 226,965 205,679 Personal services 55,242 54,817 Contractual services 2,965 4,548 Commodities 5,207 5,871 290,379 270,915 Golf dome: Cost of sales and services 215 1,324 Personal services 80,534 87,908 Contractual services 95,457 86,280 Commodities 33,609 18,872 Central services 18,516 17,616 Total golf dome 228,331 212,000 Depreciation 508,189 501,406 Total operating expenses $ 3,356,332 3,006,925 Page 84 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Arena Fund Balance Sheet December 31, 2000 (with comparative amounts for December 31, 1999) Assets Current assets: Petty cash and change funds Cash with fiscal agents Accounts receivable Due from other funds Total current assets Property and equipment, net Discount on bonds Total assets Liabilities and Retained Earnings Current liabilities: Accounts payable Salaries payable Accrued interest payable Due to other governments Compensated absences payable Total current liabilities Long -term liabilities: Deposits payable Deferred revenue Obligation under capital lease Bonds payable Total liabilities Fund equity: Contributed capital Retained earnings: Reserved for debt service Unreserved -- undesignated Total retained earnings (deficit) 2000 $ 700 2,952 108,636 568 112,856 1999 700 1,035 100,611 2,714 105,060 4,602,406 4,898,263 9,204 10,354 $ 4,724,466 5,013,677 39,683 14,902 46,105 350 68,440 169,480 3,500 5,040 151,200 1,660,000 1,989,220 3,286,798 184,591 (736,143) (551,552) 34,766 6,953 48,847 9,079 14,869 114,514 3,500 5,040 187,200 1,760,000 2,070,254 3,474,150 184,591 (715,318) (530,727) Total liabilities and retained earnings $ 4,724,466 5,013,677 Page 85 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Arena Fund Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings (Deficit) Year ended December 31, 2000 (with comparative amounts for year ended December 31, 1999) Operating expenses: Cost of sales and services 2000 1999 Operating revenues: 447,206 370,745 Sales - retail $ 24,720 26,152 Memberships 5,218 4,504 Admissions 82,745 70,749 Building rental 908,657 868,081 Rental of equipment 7,268 2,427 Otherfees Operating loss (174,245) Lessons 94,570 92,527 Skate sharpening 13,779 14,925 Total operating revenues 1,136,957 1,079,365 Operating expenses: Cost of sales and services 65 111 Personal services 447,206 370,745 Contractual services 382,772 350,860 Commodities 60,824 47,998 Central services 99,240 80,004 Depreciation 321,095 320,456 Total operating expenses 1,311,202 1,170,174 Operating loss (174,245) (90,809) Nonoperating revenues (expenses): Miscellaneous revenue 0 17,906 Interest and fiscal charges (92,989) (98,219) Interest on capital lease (9,440) (11,168) Loss on disposal of capital assets (11,353) 0 Amortization of bond discount (1,150) (1,151) Total nonoperating expenses (114,932) (92,632) Net loss before operating transfer in (289,177) (183,441) Operating transfer in: Liquor store fund 81,000 525,000 Golf course fund 0 35,000 Total operating transfers 81,000 560,000 Net Income (loss) (208,177) 376,559 Add depreciation on contributed assets 187,352 187,352 Increase (decrease) in retained earnings (20,825) 563,911 Retained earnings (deficit)- January 1 (530,727) (1,094,638) Retained earnings (deficit) - December 31 $ (551,552) (530,727) CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Arena Fund Statement of Cash Flows Year ended December 31, 2000 (with comparative amounts for year ended December 31, 1999) Cash flows from operating activities: Operating income (loss) Adjustments to reconcile operating income to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation expense Changes in assets and liabilities: Increase in accounts receivable (Increase) decrease in due from other funds (Decrease) in accounts payable Increase in salaries payable Decrease in accrued interest payable Increase (decrease) in due to other governments Increase(decrease) in compensated absences payable Decrease in due to other funds Total adjustments Net cash provided by operating activities Cash flows from noncapital financing activities: Donations Decrease in advance from other funds Operating transfer in— Liquor Fund Operating transfer in —Golf Course Fund Net cash provided by noncapital financing activities Cash flows from capital and related financing activities: Net acquisition of capital assets Loss on disposal of capital assets Principal paid on revenue bonds Principal paid on capital lease Interest paid on capital lease Interest paid on bonds Net cash used for capital and related financing activities Net increase in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year Cash and cash equivalents, end of year Page 86 2000 1999 $ (174,245) (90,809) 321,095 320,456 (8,025) (17,377) 2,146 (2,714) 4,917 (2,941) 7,949 1,468 (2,742) (2,460) (8,729) 2,316 53,571 (1,941) 0 (50,000) 370,182 246,807 195,937 155,998 0 17,906 0 (479,539) 81,000 525,000 0 35,000 81,000 98,367 (25,238) (8,791) (11,353) 0 (100,000) (100,000) (36,000) (36,000) (9,440) (11,168) (92,989) (98,219) (275,020) (254,178) 1,917 187 1,735 1,548 $ 3,652 1,735 Page 87 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Art Center Fund Balance Sheet December 31, 2000 (with comparative amounts for December 31, 1999) Assets Current assets: Petty cash and change funds Due from other funds Inventory Total current assets Property and equipment, net Total assets Liabilities and Retained Earnings Current liabilities: Accounts payable Salaries payable Due to other governments Compensated absences payable Total liabilities Fund equity: Contributed capital Retained earnings: Unreserved — undesignated Total retained earnings 2000 1999 $ 275 225 8,618 20,266 15,493 15,656 24,386 36,147 445,497 534,293 $ 469,883 570,440 16,743 13,186 4,843 4,756 735 1,020 30,405 9,795 52,726 28,757 291,926 310,301 125,231 231,382 125,231 231,382 Total liabilities and retained earnings $ 469,883 570,440 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Art Center Fund Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings Year ended December 31, 2000 (with comparative amounts for year ended December 31, 1999) Operating revenues: Sales - retail Memberships Otherfees Class fees Firing fees Media studio fees Misc fees Total operating revenues Operating expenses: Cost of goods and services Personal services Contractual services Commodities Central services Depreciation Total operating expenses Operating loss Nonoperating revenues (expenses): Donations Loss on disposal of capital assets Total nonoperating revenues (expenses) Net loss before operating transfer in Operating transfer in -- Liquor Store Net Income (loss) Add depreciation on contributed assets Increase (decrease) in retained earnings Retained eamings -- January 1 Retained earnings -- December 31 2000 $ 40,540 26,629 253,313 12,170 49,526 534 382,712 35,810 225,619 187,868 64,320 62,465 56,032 632,114 1999 51,852 25,872 225,236 11,457 42,526 615 357,558 28,963 189,170 158,353 58,142 38,232 54,987 527,847 (249,402) (170,289) 21,352 17,283 (35,476) 0 (14,124) 17,283 (263,526) (153,006) 139,000 155,000 139,000 155,000 (124,526) 1,994 18,375 17,253 (106,151) 19,247 231,382 212,135 $ 125,231 231,382 Page 88 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Art Center Fund Statement of Cash Flows Year ended December 31, 2000 (with comparative amounts for year ended December 31, 1999) Cash flows from operating activities: Operating loss Adjustments to reconcile operating income to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation expense Changes in assets and liabilities: (Increase) decrease in due from other funds (Increase) decrease in inventory Increase (decrease) in accounts payable Increase in salaries payable Increase (decrease) in due to other governments Increase in compensated absences payable Total adjustments Net cash used. by operating activities Cash flows from noncapital financing activities: Donations Operating transfer in— Liquor Store Net cash provided by noncapital financing activities Cash flow from capital and related financing activities: Net acquisition of capital assets Loss on disposal of capital assets Net cash used by capital and related financing activities Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year Cash and cash equivalents, end of year Supplemental disclosure of noncash noncapital financing activity: Contribution of fixed assets Total noncash noncapital financing activity 2000 (249,402) 56,032 11,648 163 3,557 87 (285) 20,610 91,812 (157,590) Page 89 1999 (170,289) 54,987 (20,266) (382) (27,849) 649 156 2,872 10,167 (160,122) 21,352 17,283 139,000 155,000 160,352 172,283 32,764 (12,717) (35,476) 0 (2,712) (12,717) 50 (556) 225 781 275 225 0 4,181 $ 0 4,181 Page 90 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Edinborough Park/Centennial Lake Fund Balance Sheet December 31, 2000 (with comparative amounts for December 31, 1999) Assets Current assets: Cash Petty cash and change funds Cash with fiscal agents Accounts receivable Accrued interest receivable Due from other funds Total current assets Property and equipment, net Total assets Liabilities and Retained Earnings Current liabilities: Accounts payable Salaries payable Due to other governments Compensated absences payable Total current liabilities Long -term liabilities: Obligation under capital lease Total liabilities Fund equity: Contributed capital Retained earnings: Unreserved -- undesignated Total retained earnings 2000 1999 $ 0 1,500 820 374 63,314 22,432 88,440 1,503 1,500 288 56,313 0 21,821 81,425 793,827 988,305 $ 882,267 1,069,730 26,474 17,824 3,959 78,099 126,356 38,590 17,700 1,901 25,698 83,889 42,000 52,000 168,356 135,889 654,193 804,156 59,718 129,685 59,718 129,685 Total liabilities and retained earnings $ 882,267 1,069,730 Page 91 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Edinborough Park/Centennial Lake Fund Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Retained Earnings Year ended December 31, 2000 (with comparative amounts for year ended December 31, 1999) 2000 1999 Operating revenues: Sales - concessions $ 25,062 16,275 Memberships 21,179 22,369 Admissions 58,155 61,219 Building rental 198,650 174,586 Rental of equipment 53,760 40,086 Green fees 181,447 142,759 Other fees Programs 23,099 19,137 Association fees 410,497 356,855 Miscellaneous 350 400 Total operating revenues 972,199 833,686 Operating expenses: Cost of sales and services 10,643 9,797 Personal services 665,159 608,403 Contractual services 363,495 330,295 Commodities 158,701 147,924 Central services 202,368 191,244 Depreciation 171,869 170,643 Total operating expenses 1,572,235 1,458,306 Operating loss (600,036) (624,620) Nonoperating revenues (expenses): Investment income 322,663 266,127 Miscellaneous revenue 87 5,655 Interest on capital lease (2,622) (3,102) Loss on disposal of capital assets (48,022) (547) Total nonoperating revenues 272,106 268,133 Net loss before operating transfers (327,930) (356,487) Operating transfer in - General Fund 108,000 206,000 Total operating transfers 108,000 . 206,000 Net loss (219,930) (150,487) Add depreciation on contributed assets 149,963 136,017 Decrease in retained earnings (69,967) (14,470) Retained earnings -- January 1 129,685 144,155 Retained earnings -- December 31 $ 59,718 129,685 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Edinborough Park/Centennial Lake Fund Statement of Cash Flows Year ended December 31, 2000 (with comparative amounts for year ended December 31, 1999) Cash flows from operating activities: Operating loss Adjustments to reconcile operating income to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation expense Changes in assets and liabilities: (Increase) decrease in accounts receivable (Increase) decrease in due from other funds (Increase) decrease in accounts payable Increase in salaries payable Increase in due to other government Increase (decrease) in compensated absences payable Miscellaneous revenue Total adjustments Net cash used by operating activities Cash flows from noncapital financing activities: Operating transfer in - General Fund Net cash provided by noncapital financing activities Cash flow from capital financing activities: Net acquisition of capital assets Loss on disposal of capital assets Principal paid on capital lease Interest paid on capital lease Net cash used by capital financing activities Cash flows from investing activities: Decrease in interest receivable Investment income Net cash provided by investing activities Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year Page 92 2000 1999 $ (600,036) (624,620) 171,869 55,939 (611) (12,116) 124 2,058 52,401 87 269,751 170,643 (53,563) 788 14,941 980 253 1,186 5,655 140,883 (330,285) (483,737) 108,000 206,000 108,000 206,000 22,609 (21,859) (48,022) (547) (10,000) (10,000) (2,622) (3,102) (38,035) (35,508) (63,314) 48,674 322,663 266,127 259,349 314,801 (971) 1,556 3,291 1,735 Cash and cash equivalents, end of year $ 2,320 3,291 Page 93 TRUST AND AGENCY FUNDS Trust funds account for assets held by a governmental unit in a trustee capacity for individual organizations, other governmental units, and other funds. The city has one expendable trust fund. Deferred Compensation Expendable Trust Fund: Accounts for assets that are held in a trustee capacity by the City for employees in accordance with the provisions of Internal Revenue Code Section 457. Agency funds account for assets held by a governmental unit as an agent for individuals, private organizations, other governmental units and other funds. The city has the following Agency funds. Police Seizure Fund: Accounts for funds obtained by the police department which will be remitted to the proper governments. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Trust and Agency Funds Combining Balance Sheet Year ended December 31, 2000 (with comparative totals for December 31, 1999) Expendable Trust Agency Deferred Police Compensation Seizure Assets: Page 94 Totals 2000 1999 Cash $ 0 140,432 140,432 191,965 Cash and investments with plan administrators 3,999,778 0 3,999,778 3,913,274 Total assets $ 3,999,778 140,432 4,140,210 4,105,239 Liabilities: Due to other funds $ 0 41,678 41,678 41,678 Due to other governments 0 98,754 98,754 150,287 Total liabilities 0 140,432 140,432 191,965 Fund balance: Reserved for deferred compensation plan participants 3,999,778 0 3,999,778 3,913,274 Total liabilities and fund balances $ 3,999,778 140,432 4,140,210 4,105,239 Page 95 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Deferred Compensation Expendable Trust Fund Balance Sheet Year ended December 31, 2000 (with comparative totals for December 31, 1999) Assets: Cash and cash equivalents Liabilities and fund balances: Fund balance: 2000 $ 3,999,778 1999 3,913,274 Reserved for deferred compensation plan participants $ 3,999,778 3,913,274 Page 96 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Deferred Compensation Expendable Trust Fund Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances Year ended December 31, 2000 (with comparative totals for December 31, 1999) 2000 1999 Revenues: Net appreciation in fair value of investments $ (116,184) 579,053 Employee contributions 311,157 291,458 Total revenues 194,973 870,511 Expenditures: Distributions to plan participants 102,254 47,455 Administrative expense 6,215 5,630 Total expenditures 108,469 53,085 Excess of revenues over expenditures 86,504 817,426 Fund balance - January 1 3,913,274 3,095,848 Fund balance - December 31 $ 3,999,778 3,913,274 Page 97 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Agency Funds Combining Statement of Changes in Assets and Liabilities Year ended December 31, 2000 Balance Balance 1/1/00 Additions Deductions 12/31/00 Police Seizure Fund Assets: Cash $ 191,965 0 51,533 140,432 Liabilities: Due to other funds 41,678 0 0 41,678 Due to other governments 150,287 0 51,533 98,754 $ 191,965 0 51,533 140,432 Page 98 GENERAL FIXED ASSETS ACCOUNT GROUP The General Fixed Assets Account Group provides for the accounting of fixed assets other than those accounted for in the Enterprise Funds. Page 99 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA General Fixed Assets Account Group Schedule of General Fixed Assets December 31, 2000 (with comparative amounts for December 31, 1999) 2000 1999 General fixed assets: Land and land improvements $ 35,833,521 35,843,819 Buildings 20,684,526 20,637,734 Furniture and fixtures 1,155,256 1,343,763 Vehicles and equipment 10,288,763 10,576,211 Parks 16,293,082 15,979,022 Construction -in- progress 6,706,314 746,284 Total general fixed assets $ 90,961,462 85,126,833 Total investment in general fixed assets $ 90,961,462 85.126,833 Page 100 GENERAL LONG -TERM DEBT ACCOUNT GROUP The General Long -term Debt Account Group is used to account for the long -term debt of the City other than debt recorded in the Enterprise Funds. Primarily, these are general obligations and other forms of long -term debt supported by general revenues and special assessments, and are obligations of a governmental unit as a whole and not its individual constituent funds. Page 101 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA General Long -term Debt Account Group Schedule of General Long -term Debt December 31, 2000 (with comparative amounts for December 31, 1999) 2000 1999 Amount available and to be provided for the retirement of long -term debt: General Obligation Bonds: Amount to be provided by tax increment financing Amount to be provided by property taxes Amount to be provided by special assessments Compensated absences: Amount to be provided by revenue sources Total available and to be provided General long -term debt payable: Accrued compensated absences Obligation under capital lease payable General obligation bonds payable Total general long -term debt payable $ 66,670,000 50,260,000 7,976,010 8,309,899 170,000 350,000 2,220,886 612,972 $ 77.036.896 59.532.871 2,220,886 612,973 426,010 484,898 74,390,000 58,435,000 $ 77.036.896 59.532.871 --- --' - - '-r---^ F] Page 110 Exhibit 5 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Assessed Valuation, Tax Levies and Mill Rates (shown by year of tax collectibility) 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Assessed valuation/tax capacity $ 91,586,990 87,726,810 85,963,836 90,806,947 99,650,358 Increment valuation (5,517,147) (5,729,884) (6,230,928) (7,087,107) (8,559,204) Contribution to fiscal disparities pool (8,385,640) (6,451,992) (7,511,473) (9,014,784) (10,127,351) Received from fiscal disparities pool 2,402,957 2,217,217 2,199,224 2,460,913 2,752,149 Taxable valuation $ 80,087,160 77,762,151 74,420,659 77,165,969 83.715,952 Tax levies: General Fund $ 12,531,244 13.099,140 13,284,962 13,650,158 14,438,346 Tax Capacity.Rate: General Fund $ 15.626 16.813 17.810 17.669 17.233 Exhibit 4 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Schedule of Debt Service Requirements December 31, 2000 Year Tax Increment Bonds General Obligation Bonds Improvement Bonds Revenue Bonds Ended Principal Interest Principal Interest Principal Interest Principal Interest 2001 3,270,000 3,205,971 300,000 398,888 170,000 4,420 780,000 664,443 2002 5,695,000 3,245,195 300,000 385,163 0 0 855,000 626,638 2003 9,830,000 2,828,406 325,000 370,388 0 0 1,120,000 580,673 2004 6,455,000 2,387,601 325,000 354,625 0 0 1,215,000 526,248 2005 6,920,000 2,040,765 350,000 337,913 0 0 1,285,000 466,720 2006 6,690,000 1,685,165 375,000 319,600 0 0 1,340,000 402,758 2007 7,145,000 1,317,030 375,000 300,288 0 0 1,400,000 334,718 2008 8,675,000 888,368 400,000 279,938 0 0 1,480,000 262,031 2009 9,235,000 398,381 425,000- 257,863 0 0 1,540,000 184,543 2010 795,000 124,360 450,000 234,125 0 0 640,000 128,198 2011 840,000 82,631 475,000 208,800 0 0 675,000 94,067 2012 545,000 46,340 500,000 181,863 0 0 705,000 58,015 2013 575,000 15,813 525,000 153,288 0 0 750,000 19,767 2014 0 0 550,000 123,050 0 0 0 0 2015 0 0 600,000 90,413 0 0 0 0 2016 0 0 625,000 55,344 0 0 0 0 2017 0 0 650,000 18,688 0 0 0 0 2018 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 $ 66,670,000 18,266,027 7,550,000 4,070,231 170,000 4,420 13,785,000 4,348,816 -o �o co CDJ 0 Page 108 Exhibit 3, Cont. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Schedule of Bonds Payable,'Continued Issue Interest Maturity Principal date rate date amount $4,650,000 Recreational Facility Refunding Bonds, Series 1992C 11/1/02 $335,000 5.20 1/1/01 335,000 $360,000 5.40 1/1/02 360,000 $365,000 5.50 1/1/03 365,000 $380,000 5.60 1/1/04 380,000 $410,000 5.70 1/1/05 410,000 $435,000 5.80 1/1/06 435,000 $445,000 5.90 1/1/07 445,000 $495,000 5.95 1/1/08 495,000 $505,000 6.00 1/1/09 505,000 3,730,000 $3,600,000 Utility Revenue Revenue Bond, Series 1999A 5/3/99 $310,000 3.50 2/1/01 310,000 $325,000 3.60 2/1/02 325,000 $335,000 3.70 2/1/03 335,000 $345,000 3.80 211/04 345,000 $360,000 3.85 2/1/05 360,000 $375,000 4.00 2/1/06 375,000 $390,000 4.00 2/1/07 390,000 $405,000 4.10 2/1/08 405,000 $420,000 4.20 2/1/09 420,000 3,265,000 $3,270,000 Recreational Facility Revenue Bonds, Series 1999B 5/3199 $220,000 3.70 1/1/03 220,000 $265,000 3.80 1/1/04 255,000 $270,000 3.90 1/1/05 265,000 $290,000 4.00 1/1/06 270,000 $295,000 4.10 1/11/07 290,000 $310,000 4.20 1/11/08 295,000 $320,000 4.30 1/1/09 310,000 $320,000 4.35 1/1/10 320,000 $335,000 4.35 1/1/11 335,000 $345,000 4.40 1/1/12 345,000 $365,000 4.45 1/1/13 365,000 3,270,000 Total revenue bonds 13,785,000 Total bonds payable 88,175,000 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Schedule of Bonds Payable, Continued General Obligation Bonds: $8,090,000 General Obligation Park & Rec Bond, Series 1996B $300,000 $300,000 $325,000 $325,000 $350,000 $375,000 $375,000 $400,000 $425,000 $450,000 $475,000 $500,000 $525,000 $550,000 $600,000 $625,000 $650,000 Total General Obligation Bonds Improvement Bonds: $900,000 Improvement Refunding Bonds, Series 1992E $170,000. Total Improvement Bonds Revenue Bonds: $3,975,000 Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 1992A " $135,000 $170,000 $200,000 $235,000 $250,000 $260,000 $275,000 $285,000 $305,000 $320,000 $340,000 $360,000 $385,000 Issue Interest date rate 8/1/96 1111/92 11/1/92 4.50 4.65 4.80 4.90 5.00 5.10 5.20 5.30 5.40 5.45 5.50 5.55 5.60 5.65 5.70 5.75 5.75 5.20 5.20 5.40 5.50 5.60 5.70 5.80 5.90 5.95 6.00 6.00 6.05 6.05 6.05 Page 107 Exhibit 3, Cont. Maturity Principal date amount 2/1/01 2/1/02 2/1/03 2/1/04 2/1/05 2/1/06 2/1/07 2/1/08 2/1/09 2/1/10 2/1/11 2/1/12 2/1/13 2/1/14 2/1/15 211/16 2/1/17 2/11/01 1/1/01 1/1/02 1/1/03 1/11/04 1/1/05 1/11/06 1/1/07 1/11/08 1/11/09 1/1/10 1/1/11 1/1/12 1/1/13 " Bonds maturing in the years 2003 through 2013 will be called on January 1, 2002. 300,000 300,000 325,000 325,000 350,000 375,000 375,000 400,000 425,000 450,000 475,000 500,000 525,000 550,000 600,000 625,000 650,000 7,550,000 170,000 170,000 135,000 170,000 200,000 235,000 250,000 260,000 275,000 285,000 305,000 320,000 340,000 360,000 385,000 3,520,000 (Continued) Page 106 Exhibit 3, Cont. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Schedule of Bonds Payable, Continued (Continued) Issue Interest Maturity Principal date rate date amount $5,090,000 Tax Increment Temporary Bond, Series 1997B 47/97 $150,000 4.75 2/1/01 150,000 $175,000 4.80 2/1/02 175,000 $200,000 4.85 2/1/03 200,000 $225,000 4.95 2/1/04 225,000 $250,000 5.05 2/1/05 250,000 $405,000 5.10 2/1/06 405,000 $425,000 5.15 2/1/07 425,000 $445,000 5.20 2/1/08 445,000 $465,000 5.30 2/1/09 465,000 $490,000 5.30 2/1/10 490,000 $515,000 5.35 2/1/11 515,000 $545,000 5.40 2/1/12 545,000 $575,000 5.50 2/1/13 575,000 4,865,000 $2,620,000 Tax Increment Bond, Series 2000A 9/6/00 $0 0.00 2/1/01 0 $210,000 4.30 2/1/02 210,000 $220,000 4.35 2/1/03 220,000 $230,000 4.40 2/1/04 230,000 $240,000 4.45 2/1/05 240,000 $255,000 4.50 2/1/06 255,000 $265,000 4.55 2/1/07 265,000 $280,000 4.60 2/1/08 280,000 $290,000 4.65 2/1/09 290,000 $305,000 4.70 2/1/10 305,000 $325,000 4.80 2/1/11 325,000 2,620,000 $3,565,000 Tax Increment Taxable Bond, Series 2000B 9/6/00 $0 0.00 2/1/01 0 $0 0.00 2/1/02 0 $3,565,000 6.45 2/1/03 3,565,000 3,565,000 $15,820,000 Tax Increment Refunding Bond, Series 2000C 11/6/00 $0 2/1/01 0 $1,070,000 2/1/02 1,070,000 $1,325,000 2/1/03 1,325,000 $1,460,000 2/1/04 1,460,000 $1,505,000 2/1/05 1,505,000 $1,655,000 2/1/06 1,655,000 $2,490,000 2/11/07 2,490,000 $3,060,000 2/11/08 3,060,000 $3,255,000 2/1109 3,255,000 15,820,000 Total tax increment bonds 66,670,000 (Continued) Page 105 Exhibit 3 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Tax Increment Bonds: $17,930,000 Tax Increment Refunding Bond, Series 1992B $790,000. $1,125,000. $1,265,000. $1,410,000. $1,470,000. $1,635,000. $2,490,000. $3,090,000. $3,325,000. $19,580,000 Tax Increment Refunding Bond, Series 1993A $1,680,000. $2,415,000. $2,455,000. $2,230,000. $2,555,000. $1,740,000. $11,250,000 Tax Increment Taxable Refunding Bond, Series 1996A $650,000 $700,000 $800,000 $900,000 $900,000 $1,000,000 $1,475,000 $1,800,000 $1,900,000 Schedule of Bonds Payable December 31, 2000 Issue Interest Maturity Principal date rate date amount 11/1/92 5.20 2/1/01 790,000 5.40 2/1/02 1,125,000 5.50 2/1/03 1,265,000 5.60 2/1/04 1,410,000 5.70 2/1/05 1,470,000 5.80 2/1/06 1,635,000 5.90 2/1/07 2,490,000 5.95 2/1/08 3,090,000 6.00 2/1/09 3,325,000 16,600,000 5/1/93 4.75 2/1/01 1,680,000 4.90 2/1/02 2,415,000 5.00 2/1/03 2,455,000 5.10 2/1/04 2,230,000 5.10 2/1/05 2,555,000 5.10 2/1/06 1,740,000 13,075,000 3/1/96 5.85 2/1/01 650,000 5.85 2/1/02 700,000 5.85 2/1/03 800,000 6.00 2/1/04 900,000 6.10 2/1/05 900,000 6.10 2/1/06 1,000,000 6.15 2/1/07 1,475,000 6.20 2/1/08 1,800,000 6.25 2/1/09 1,900,000 10,125,000 Bonds maturing in the year 2002 through 2009 will be called February 1, 2001. (Continued) Tax Increment Bonds General Obligation Bonds Improvement Bonds Revenue Bonds CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Schedule of Changes in Bonded Indebtedness Year ended December 31, 2000 Balance January 1 $ 50,260,000 7,825,000 350,000 14,570,000 Issued 22,005,000 0 0 0 Page 104 Exhibit 2 Balance Redeemed December 31 5,595,000 275,000 180,000 785,000 66,670,000 7,550,000 170,000 13,785,000 $ 73,005,000 22.005A00 6,835,000 88.175.000 Page 103 Exhibit 1 2000 Percent Indebtedness paid by tax Authorized Due in 2001 levies and issued Redeemed Outstanding Principal Interest None 17,930,000 1,330,000 16,600,000 790,000 940,185 None 19,580,000 6,505,000 13,075,000 1,680,000 613,760 None 11,250,000 1,125,000 10,125,000 650,000 597,725 None 5,090,000 225,000 4,865,000 150,000 250,330 None 2,620,000 0 2,620,000 0 109,296 None 3,565,000 0 3,565,000 0 210,781 None 15,820,000 0 15,820,000 0 483,894 75,855,000 9,185,000 66,670,000 3,270,000 3,205,971 None 8,090,000 540,000 7,550,000 300,000 398,888 8,090,000 540,000 7,550,000 300,000 398,888 None 1,095,000 925,000 170,000 170,000 4,420 1,095,000 925,000 170,000 170,000 4,420 None 3,975,000 455,000 3,520,000 135,000 202,505 None 4,650,000 920,000 3,730,000 335,000 204,113 None 3,600,000 335,000 3,265,000 310,000 121,335 None 3,270,000 0 3,270,000 0 136,490 15,495,000 1,710,000 13,785,000 780,000 664,443 S 100,535,000 12,360,000 88,175,000 4,520,000 4,273,722 Page 102 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Combined Schedule of Bonded Indebtedness December 31, 2000 Total bonded indebtedness Final Interest Issue maturity rate date date Bonded indebtedness: Tax Increment Bonds: Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 1992B 4.90-6.00 11/01/92 02/01/09 Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 1993A 4.25-5.10 04/13/93 02/01/06 Tax Increment Refunding Taxable Bonds, Series 1996A 5.85-6.25 03/01/96 02/01/09 Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1997B 4.50-5.50 04/01/97 02/01/13 Tax Increment Bonds, Series 2000A 4.30-4.80 09/06/00 02/01/11 Taxable Tax Increment Bonds, Series 2000B 6.45 09/06/00 02/01/03 Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 2000C 4.50-4.65 11/06/00 02/01/09 General Obligation Bonds: General Obligation Park & Rec Bonds, Series 1996B 4.25-5.75 08/01/96 02/01/17 Improvement Bonds: Improvement Refunding Bonds, Series 1992E 4.00-5.20 11/01/92 02101/01 Revenue Bonds: Recreation Bonds, Series 1992A 4.00-6.05 11/01/92 01/01/13 Recreation Refunding Bonds, Series 1992C 4.40-6.00 11/01/92 01/01/09 Utility Revenue Bonds,1999A 3.20-4.20 05/03/99 02/01/09 Recreational Facility Bonds, 1999B 3.70-4.45 05/03/99 01/01/13 Total bonded indebtedness STATISTICAL"SECTION Fiscal General Public year government safety Public works CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA General Governmental Expenditures by Function (a) Last Ten Fiscal Years (Unaudited - see accompanying auditors' report) Parks Unallocated general Capital Debt expenditures Other outlay service Table 1 Total 1991 1,996,628 6,116,844 2,862,383 1,787,171 617,117 981,143 8,003,595 5,863,425 28,228,306 1992 1,987,784 6,218,655 2,750,808 2,137,194 588,319 4,429,119 586,679 5,963,850 24,662,408 1993 1,999,863 6,544,220 2,990,247 1,744,807 117,451 1,877,110 496,334 6,647,360 22,417,392 1994 2,097,521 6,774,592 2,985,893 1,725,641 180,589 3,273,848 700,451 7,333,466 25,072,001 1995 2,069,527 7,251,129 3,160,831 1,850,610 309,152 5,389,205 804,587 7,873,815 28,708,856 1996 2,201,312 7,440,601 3,290,742 1,919,759 251,215 5,847,706 970,882 6,281,475 28,203,692 1997 2,247,040 7,717,334 3,537,441 2,031,261 340,510 1,597,747 16,796,824 6,622,948 40,891,105 1998 2,528,560 8,131,293 4,084,651 1,960,111 333,793 1,104,738 7,530,051 6,324,533 31,997,730 1999 2,527,547 8,516,673 3,744,124 2,240,730 366,332 1,005,781 5,599,636 6,537,266 30,538,089 2000 2,635,357 8,846,360 3,672,057 2,150,588 346,099 1,576,968 8,352,494 6,658,601 34,238,524 Note: (a) Includes General, Special Revenue, Debt Service and Capital Project Funds. v d CD J J J Table 2 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA General Governmental Revenues by Source (a) Last Ten Fiscal Years (Unaudited - see accompanying auditors' report) Note: (a) Includes General, Special Revenue, Debt Service and Capital Project Funds. d co M i Interest on funds Licenses Charges held with Sales and Fiscal Special Franchise and Inter- for Fines and Interest on fiscal rental of year Taxes assessments Fee permits governmental services forfeitures Investments agent property Miscellaneous Totals 1991 14,425,200 980,689 133,680 850,897 580,561 1,287,524 437,433 875,320 0 124,149 437,429 20,132,882 1992 15,935,816 1,563,993 168,122 820,007 1,000,395 1,360,233 471,038 424,622 0 100,000 3,107,110 24,951,336 1993 17,505,272 991,394 260,039 1,037,783 1,749,631 1,167,446 350,582 431,976 1,443,530 100,765 205,432 25,243,850 1994 17,637,458 1,087,831 206,261 947,122 1,807,826 1,251,603 322,992 591,985 1,727,103 174,970 1,016,605 26,771,756 1995 15,534,902 858,897 209,519 1,070,352 5,693,802 1,510,470 545,996 411,345 1,742,621 68,871 591,318 28,238,093 1996 16,089,705 969,468 224,489 1,382,427 3,928,352 1,621,635 456,589 950,129 1,175,976 108,111 292,018 27,198,899 1997 17,653,621 955,206 331,527 1,388,968 1,996,744 2,842,923 562,910 1,199,251 1,038,850 152,398 194,879 28,317,077 1998 20,567,867 844,070 296,427 2,091,365 2,551,452 1,833,148 691,355 1,353,521 43,331 86,639 604,099 30,963,274 1999 21,995,230 990,330 297,866 2,135,541 3,185,008 2,070,476 794,710 415,114 0 284,085 478,788 32,647,148 2000 22,904,512 1,159,876 336,678 1,835,828 1,880,680 2,902,666 967,421 2,287,349 88,788 1,156,526 96,932 35,617,256 Note: (a) Includes General, Special Revenue, Debt Service and Capital Project Funds. d co M i Fiscal Total tax year levy CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Property Tax Levies and Collections Last Ten Fiscal Years (Unaudited - see accompanying auditors' report) Percent of total Current tax tax levy collections collected Adjustments/ Delinquent tax collections Total tax collections Percent of total tax collections to total tax levy Outstanding delinquent taxes Table 3 Percent of outstanding delinquent taxes to total tax levy 1991 10,384,072 10,129,419 97.55% 38,558 10,167,977 97.92% 241,915 2.33% 1992 10,182,324 9,887,842 97.11% 126,956 10,014,798 98.35% 274,437 2.70% 1993 10,485,115 9,989,612 95.27% (2,977) 9,986,635 95.25% 204,153 1.95% 1994 10,927,551 10,691,572 97.84% 5,819 10,697,391 97.89% 154,482 1.41% 1995 11,390,898 11,198,647 98.31% (67,047) 11,131,600 97.72% 88,399 0.78% 1996 12,178,440 12,026,177 98.75% (262,279) 11,763,898 96.60% 36,198 0.30% 1997 12,531,244 12,381,729 98.81% (244,913) 12,136,816 96.85% 39,107 0.31% 1998 13,099,140 13,003,882 99.27% 48,985 13,052,867 99.65% 54,226 0.41% 1999 13,284,962 13,147,288 98.96% 36,293 13,183,581 99.24% 99,202 0.75% 2000 13,650,158 13,554,044 99.30% 15,355 13,569,399 99.41% 116,362 0.85% T w cc M CIO Page 114 Table 4 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Assessed Value or Tax Capacity and Estimated Market Value of Taxable Property Last Ten Fiscal Years (Unaudited - see accompanying auditors' report) Ratio of total Real property assessed value/ tax capacity to Assessment Assessed value/ Estimated total estimated year tax capacity market value market value 1991 87,214,668 3,496,892,900 2.49% 1992 83,480,350 3,568,897,100 2.34% 1993 81,413,953 3,607,576,600 2.26% 1994 82,244,215 3,733,888,400 2.20% 1995 84,055,819 3,849,796,600 2.18% 1996 85,775,887 4,071,654,134 2.11% 1997 91,586,990 4,074,713,634 2.25% 1998 87,726,810 4,267,758,501 2.06% 1999 85,963,836 4,535,761,900 1.90% 2000 90,055,752 4,861,730,000 1.85% Page 115 Table 5 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Property Tax Rates -All Overlapping Governments (per $100 of assessed value) Last Ten Fiscal Years (Unaudited - see accompanying auditors' report) City of Edina Special Fiscal General Revenue School year Fund Funds Total District County Other Total 1991 12.879 - 12.879 45.490 30.114 8.441 96.924 1992 13.480 - 13.480 51.823 34.327 6.633 106.263 1993 15.092 - 15.092 63.743 35.839 7.629 122.303 1994 16.032 - 16.032 61.417 37.441 7.515 122.405 1995 15.577 - 15.577 57.975 37.454 6.851 117.857 1996 16.331 - 16.331 62.268 37.270 7.494 123.363 1997 15.626 - 15.626 57.213 35.515 6.659 115.013 1998 16.813 - 16.813 47.499 38.388 7.538 110.682 1999 17.810 - 17.810 50.766 40.994 8.553 118.123 2000 17.669 - 17.669 51.678 39.655 8.426 117.428 Table 6 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Special Assessment Collections Last Ten Fiscal Years (Unaudited - see accompanying auditors' report) T d CD CD 0) Percentage Collection Percentage Collection of total Total of current of levy of prior Total collections outstanding Year Total levy year's levy collected year's levy collections to total levy assessments 1991 586,124 558,429 95.27% 24,934 583,363 99.53% 78,101 1992 998,069 977,184 97.91% 39,851 1,017,035 101.90% 27,228 1993 834,099 826,178 99.05% 12,890 839,068 100.60% 22,259 1994 807,324 800,456 99.15% 5,622 806,078 99.85% 27,523 1995 786,480 779,517 99.11% 7,508 787,025 100.07% 26,223 1996 768,800 764,997 99.51% 16,636 781,633 101.67% 13,389 1997 590,048 576,513 97.71% 9,036 585,549 99.24% 17,889 1998 654,442 635,476 97.10% 3,798 639,274 97.68% 33,057 1999 773,251 753,251 97.41% 14,273 767,524 99.26% 38,784 2000 960,562 930,484 96.87% 5,586 936,070 97.45% 63,275 T d CD CD 0) Table 7 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Ratio of Net General Bonded Debt to Assessed Value/Tax Capacity and Net Bonded Debt Per Capita Last Ten Fiscal Years (Unaudited - see accompanying auditors' report) *Source: Metropolitan Council estimate Notes: (a) Official population per 2000 census. (b) Includes all long -term general obligation debt. v CD CD Ratio of Net net bonded Net assessed Debt debt to bonded value /tax Gross service assessed debt Fiscal capacity (in bonded monies Net bonded value /tax per year *Population thousands) debt (b) available debt capacity capita 1991 46,070 75,550 63,565,000 1,026,815 62,538,185 82.78% 1,357 1992 46,079 69,276 90,880,000 26,899,229 63,980,771 92.36% 1,389 1993 46,916 68,259 108,165,000 45,994,060 62,170,940 91.08% 1,325 1994 46,984 73,066 104,615,000 44,810,021 59,804,979 81.85% 1,273 1995 46,841 74,787 101,775,000 43,265,984 58,509,016 78.23% 1,249 1996 46,845 80,087 92,680,000 25,429,215 67,250,785 83.97% 1,436 1997 47,029 77,762 94,385,000 17,929,523 76,455,477 98.32% 1,626 1998 47,113 85,259 70,260,000 589,371 69,670,629 81.72% 1,479 1999 47,235 77,191 73,005,000 4,384,419 68,620,581 88.90% 1,453 2000 47,425 (a) 83,716 88,175,000 20,144,460 68,030,540 81.26% 1,434 *Source: Metropolitan Council estimate Notes: (a) Official population per 2000 census. (b) Includes all long -term general obligation debt. v CD CD Page 118 Table 8 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Computation of Overlapping Debt December 31, 2000 (Unaudited - see accompanying auditors' report) Percentage Amount applicable applicable Net debt to City of to City of Jurisdiction outstanding Edina Edina City of Edina $ 57,874,958 100.00% $ 57,874,958 Hennepin County 216,028,146 7.48% 16,158,905 ISD #273 (Edina) 35,811,780 97.01% 34,741,008 ISD #270 (Hopkins) 41,330,781 7.31% 3,021,280 ISD #271 (Bloomington) 106,229,731 0.01% 10,623 ISD #272 (Eden Prairie) 130,191,019 1.21% 1,575,311 ISD #280 (Richfield) 49,644,185 24.93% 12,376,295 ISD #283 (St. Louis Park) 12,033,074 0.01% 1,203 Metro Council 115,003,645 3.80% 4,370,139 Hennepin County Regional Parks 12,026,336 9.88% 1,188,202 $ 131.317.924 Fiscal year Principal CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Ratio of Annual Debt Service Expenditures for General Bonded Debt to Total General Expenditures Last Ten Fiscal Years (Unaudited - see accompanying auditors' report) Interest Total debt service Total general expenditures (a) Page 119 Table 9 Ratio of total debt service to total general expenditures 1991 1,480,000 4,386,400 5,866,400 20,559,514 28.53% 1992 1,790,000 4,173,850 5,963,850 19,610,522 30.41% 1993 1,800,000 4,847,360 6,647,360 21,384,897 31.08% 1994 1,185,000 6,148,466 7,333,466 22,035,991 33.28% 1995 2,495,000 5,378,815 7,873,815 23,630,853 33.32% 1996 1,400,000 4,881,475 6,281,475 23,128,537 27.16% 1997 2,120,000 4,502,948 6,622,948 24,000,082 27.60% 1998 2,224,724 4,099,809 6,324,533 25,390,000 24.91% 1999 3,275,000 3,262,266 6,537,266 25,131,088 26.01% 2000 3,550,000 3,108,601 6,658,601 25,814,880 25.79% Notes: (a) Includes General, Special Revenue, and Debt Service Funds. Table 10 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Revenue Bond Coverage Last Ten Fiscal Years (Unaudited - see accompanying auditors' report) Net revenue *Before interest costs. m N O Direct* available Gross operating for debt Debt service requirements Fiscal year revenue expenses service Principal Interest Total Coverage Utility Bond 1991 6,399,204 5,583,502 815,702 250,000 175,245 425,245 192 1992 5,867,015 5,365,942 501,073 275,000 169,233 444,233 113 1993 7,122,636 6,238,142 884,494 300,000 214,791 514,791 172 1994 7,011,288 6,602,736 408,552 2,165,000 155,573 2,320,573 18 1995 7,591,331 6,766,288 825,043 345,000 78,182 423,182 195 1996 7,753,016 7,007,293 745,723 370,000 52,019 422,019 177 1997 8,110,744 7,526,033 584,711 390,000 40,744 430,744 136 1998 8,108,612 7,226,648 881,964 400,000 22,184 422,184 209 1999 8,502,423 6,713,673 1,788,750 420,000 83,429 503,429 355 2000 8,793,386 7,205,934 1,587,452 335,000 127,525 462,525 343 Recreational Facility Bonds 1991 2,413,488 2,248,196 165,292 140,000 407,690 547,690 30 1992 2,552,605 2,288,778 263,827 195,000 398,127 593,127 44 1993 2,987,774 2,600,826 386,948 195,000 707,454 902,454 43 1994 3,446,755 3,086,401 360,354 200,000 854,920 1,054,920 34 1995 3,824,627 3,262,948 561,679 0 839,244 839,244 67 1996 4,311,141 3,545,291 765,850 250,000 774,800 1,024,800 75 1997 4,440,202 3,945,975 494,227 295,000 762,411 1,057,411 47 1998 5,042,394 4,270,042 772,352 4,240,000 372,390 4,612,390 17 1999 5,141,606 4,332,932 808,674 430,000 522,050 952,050 85 2000 5,727,930 5,209,610 518,320 450,000 553,962 1,003,962 52 *Before interest costs. m N O Table 11 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Property and Construction Values Last Ten Fiscal years (Unaudited - see accompanying auditors' report) Commercial construction Fiscal Number of year permits Value Residential construction Number of Property value* permits Value Commercial /Industrial Residential /Apartments 1991 518 21,596,135 546 22,781,128 751,280,100 2,745,612,800 1992 415 18,371,703 647 22,086,178 767,495,300. 2,801,401,800 1993 396 35,014,704 673 27,505,219 711,471,100 2,896,105,500 1994 267 14,695,441 689 29,985,727 691,570,800 3,042,317,600 1995 274 14,349,143 564 28,064,106 668,098,800 3,181,697,800 1996 279 35,789,432 1,318 31,334,870 745,200,700 3,326,107,834 1997 407 37,074,290 1,780 32,387,315 824,767,100 3,438,309,200 1998 462 38,495,806 1,830 35,625,118 904,869,800 3,623,187,200 1999 323 36,708,942 3,478 27,637,742 980,837,900 3,924,031,400 2000 1418 66,980,499 4,013 48,278,737 1,069,928,100 4,387,874,100 *Assessor's estimated market value .o w co m N Page 122 Table 12 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Principal Taxpayers December 31, 2000 (Unaudited - see accompanying auditors' report) 2000 tax Taxpayer Type of Business capacity. Southdale Shopping center $ 4,906,659 Gabberts and Galleria Shopping center 1,614,622 Pentagon Office Park Office building 1,560,591 Southdale Office Park Office building 1,359,207 United Health Care Corporation Office building 882,609 National Car Office Building 957,300 Southdale Medical Building Office building 716,706 Cedars of Edina Apartments 710,438 Centennial Lakes Retail Retail 663,442 Edinborough Plaza Apartments 508,820 Target Retail 432,156 Jerry's Center Retail 375,437 Edinborough Office East Office building 355,762 Durham Apartments 396,293 York Plaza Apartments 394,519 Hawthorne Suites Hotel Hotel 329,017 7600 France Office building 342,821 7301 Ohms La Office building 319,242 7373 France Medical Office 344,793 7317 Cahill . Industrial 292,824 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Major Employers in the City December 31, 2000 (Unaudited - see accompanying auditors' report) Employer Product/Service Fairview Southdale Hospital Jerry's Enterprises Inc. Golden Valley Microwave Foods Health Risk Management Inc. Dayton's J.C. Penney Norwest Funding Nash Finch Co. International Dairy Queen Inc. Roach Organization Inc. Techpower Inc. Health Care Groceries Manufacturing Pension, Health and Welfare Funds Department Store Department Store Mortgage Bankers & Correspondents Groceries Eating Places Computer & Computer Software Stores Help Supply Services Source: City of Edina "Community Profile" Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic Development, 1999 Page 123 Table 13 Approximate Number of Employees 2,400 2,000 650 552 500 400 358 350 300 140 120 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Labor Force Data December 31, 2000 (Unaudited - see accompanying auditors' report) December 2000 Civilian Labor Force Unemployment Rate Page 124 Table 14 December 1999 Civilian Unemployment Labor Force Rate Hennepin County 666,108 2.4% 655,689 1.9% Mpls. -St. Paul MSA 1,751,767 2.7% 1,707,123 2.2% State of Minnesota 2,772,628 3.7% 2,706,421 3.1% Source: Minnesota Department of Economic Security. 1999 data is preliminary. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Miscellaneous Statistics December 31, 2000 (Unaudited - see accompanying auditors' report) Date of incorporation December 17, 1888 Date of adoption of Council- Manager Plan January 1, 1955 Present form of government Council- Manager Fiscal year begins January 1 Area of City 16 square miles Percent of City developed with buildings 97% Miles of streets and sewers: Total streets (including state and county) 224 miles Sanitary sewer 186.22 miles Sewer connections 13984 Fire protection: Number of stations 2 Number of employees (full time) 30 Police protection: Number of stations 1 Number of employees (full time) 64 Park areas: Present park acres and open space 1,600 Total improved park acres 1,007 Number of parks 39 Private golf courses 2 Public golf courses 3 Municipal water plant: Number of wells 18 Miles of watermain 198.81 Gallons of storage 7 million Number of consumers 14,025 Page 125 Table 15 (Continued) Page 126 Table 15, Cont. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Miscellaneous Statistics, Continued Population: 1930 3,138 1940 5,855 1950 9,744 1960 28,501 1965 (special census) 35,302 1970 44,046 1975 (estimated April 1) 49,736 1980 (census) 46,073 1981 (estimated April 1) 46,080 1982 (estimated April 1) 45,370 1983 (estimated April 1) 45,340 1984 (estimated April 1) 45,280 1985 (estimated April 1) 44,940 1986 (estimated April 1) 45,523 1987 (estimated April 1) 45,924 1988 (estimated April 1) 46,095 1989 (estimated April 1) 44,943 1990 (census) 46,070 1991 (estimated) 46,070 1992 (estimated May 1992) 46,079 1993 (estimated June 1993) 46,916 1994 (estimated June 1994) 46,984 1995 (estimated June 1995) 46,841 1996 (estimated June 1996) 46,845 1997 (estimated June 1997) 47,029 1998 (estimated June 1998) 47,113 1999 (estimated June 1999) 47,235 2000 (census) 47,425 Page 127 Table 16 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Schedule of Sources and Uses of Public Funds for 50th & France -No. 1200, a Tax Increment Financing District (Districts 1200, 1201, 1203, and 1204 are pooled) (Unaudited - see accompanying auditors' report) December 31, 2000 Accounted Original Amended for in Current Amount budget budget prior years year remaining Sources of funds: Bond proceeds $ 2,200,000 5,280,000 5,251,998 0 28,002 Tax increments received 0 31,748,489 16,310,824 1,441,522 13,996,143 Real estate sales' 800,000 170,782 170,782 0 0 State aid 0 418,871 418,871 0 0 Special assessments 0 1,321,096 728,505 0 592,591 Parking permits 0 268,524 268,524 0 0 Community develop- ment 0 186,064 186,064 0 0 Interest on invested funds 0 2,000,000 1,674,001 437,641 (111,642) Other 0 73,881 73,881 0 0 Total sources of funds 3,000,000 41,467,707 25,083,450 1,879,163 14,505,094 Uses of funds: Land acquisition 0 873,061 873,061 0 0 Installation of public utilities and improvements 3,000,000 7,867,034 5,862,998 1,999,034 5,002 Bond payments Principal 0 5,280,000 2,200,000 0 3,080,000 Interest 0 4,738,329 3,572,074 158,450 1,007,805 Administrative costs 0 1,230,000 1,120,739 41,740 67,521 Paid to other governments 0 21,000 6,940 1,833 12,227 Work orders 0 16,257 16,257 0 0 Contingencies 0 11,644 11,644 0 0 Interest 0 463,037 463,037 0 0 Miscellaneous 0 62,095 62,095 0 0 Transfer 0 10,000,000 0 2,972,644 7,027,356 Total uses of funds 3,000,000 30,562,457 14,188,845 5,173,701 11,199,911 Funds remaining (or deficient) 0 10,905,250 10,894,605 (3,294,538) 3,305,183 Cost to authority Price paid by developer 'Real estate sales Liquor store site $ 128,064 105,002 Union oil site 134,506 65,780 $ 262,570 170,782 Page 128 Table 17 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Schedule of Sources and Uses of Public Funds for Southeast Edina Redevelopment District -No. 1201, a Tax Increment Financing District (Districts 1200, 1201, 1203, and 1204 are pooled) (Unaudited - see accompanying auditors' report) December 31, 2000 Accounted Original Amended for in Current Amount budget budget prior years year remaining Sources of funds: Bond proceeds $ 6,165,177 21,470,000 20,219,852 0 1,250,148 Tax increments received 0 75,000,000 34,648,334 3,514,203 36,837,463 Real estate sales' 598,005 3,000,000 2,642,115 0 357,885 Loan proceeds 0 1,321,096 0 0 1,321,096 Community develop- ment Block Grant 0 189,221 189,221 0 0 Interest on invested funds 0 3,500,000 2,342,999 153,102 1,003,899 Other 0 50,000 1,357 0 48,643 Total sources of funds 6,763,182 104,530,317 60,043,878 3,667,305 40,819,134 Uses of funds: Land acquisition 6,682,998 12,200,000 6,894,303 0 5,305,697 Installation of public utilities and improvements 0 16,000,000 14,278,823 0 1,721,177 Site improvements or preparation costs 2,885,484 2,000,000 468,098 0 1,531,902 Bond payments Principal 0 21,470,000 11,675,000 1,410,000 8,385,000 Interest 0 20,100,000 18,109,222 498,340 1,492,438 Administrative costs 194,700 1,800,000 1,673,387 8,004 118,609 Paid to other governments 0 110,000 23,826 8,702 77,472 Transfers out 0 17,000,000 5,474,234 1,132,078 10,393,688 Interest reduction 0 1,850,000 0 0 1,850,000 Parkland dedication fees 0 767,852 767,852 0 0 Total uses of funds 9,763,182 93,297,852 59,364,745 3,057,124 30,875,983 Funds remaining (or deficient) (3,000,000) 11,232,465 679,133 610,181 9,943,151 Cost to authority Price paid by developer 'Real estate sales Retail site $ 8,350 11,899 Hotel site 192,915 192,915 Elderly site 453,740 346,534 Office site 1,027,277 784,563 Coventry Townhouses 1,318,103 1,318,103 $ 3,000,385 2,654,014 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Schedule of Sources and Uses of Public Funds for Grandview Area Redevelopment District -No. 1202, a Tax Increment Financing District (Unaudited - see accompanying auditors' report) December 31, 2000 Sources of funds: Bond proceeds Tax increments received Real estate sales Interest on invested funds Other Total sources of funds Uses of funds: Land acquisition Installation of public utilities and improvements Bond payments Principal Interest Administrative costs Total uses of funds Funds remaining (or deficient) Page 129 Table 18 Accounted Original Amended for in Current Amount budget budget prior years year remaining $ 4,500,000 8,400,000 4,471,603 3,604,312 324,085 0 26,495,107 6,932,942 703,666 18,858,499 0 4,700,000 0 0 4,700,000 0 300,000 299,830 180,074 (179,904) 0 0 66,299 0 (66,299) 4,500,000 39,895,107 11,770,674 4,488,052 23,636,381 0 6,100,000 2,784,785 0 3,315,215 4,310,000 16,702,000 3,286,127 758,520 12,657,353 0 8,400,000 1,250,000 200,000 6,950,000 0 7,140,000 1,540,088 157,342 5,442,570 190,000 1,553,107 950,641 312,579 289,887 4,500,000 39,895,107 9,811,641 1,428,441 28,655,025 $ 0 0 1,959,033 3,059,611 (5,018,644) Page 130 Table 19 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Schedule of Sources and Uses of Public Funds for Southeast Edina Redevelopment District -No. 1203, a Tax Increment Financing District (Districts 1200, 1201, 1203, and 1204 are pooled) (Unaudited - see accompanying auditors' report) December 31, 2000 Uses of funds: Land acquisition 13,900,000 22,981,425 Accounted 0 0 Installation of public Original Amended for in Current Amount utilities and improvements budget budget prior years year remaining Sources of funds: Bond proceeds $ 41,400,000 41,400,000 33,761,679 0 7,638,321 Tax increments 38,000,000 38,000,000 23,441,736 1,869,443 12,688,821 received 80,000,000 90,000,000 11,788,703 2,930,922 75,280,375 Real estate sales' 5,000,000 11,637,070 11,637,070 0 0 Special assessment 0 1,321,096 0 0 1,321,096 Interest on invested 0 2,030,345 2,030,345 0 0 funds 0 2,500,000 2,181,612 3,132 315,256 Transfer in 0 28,000,000 6,585,457 4,104,722 17,309,821 Sale of material 0 255,710 255,710 0 0 Developer payments 0 297,826 297,826 0 0 Other 0 20,000 59,091 445 (39,536) Total sources of Retail and theater site $ 3,213,720 funds 126,400,000 175,431,702 66,567,148 7,039,221 101,825,333 Uses of funds: Land acquisition 13,900,000 22,981,425 22,981,425 0 0 Installation of public utilities and improvements 26,677,000 25,871,230 13,423,059 3,087,433 9,360,738 Bond payments Principal 41,400,000 41,400,000 2,659,724 1,485,000 37,255,276 Interest 38,000,000 38,000,000 23,441,736 1,869,443 12,688,821 Administrative costs 1,140,800 1,600,000 1,094,262 119,158 386,580 Paid to other governments 0 42,000 5,615 2,468 33,917 Loan/note interest 0 14,684,711 334,877 475,719 13,874,115 Parkland dedication 0 2,030,345 2,030,345 0 0 Total uses of funds 121,117,800 146,609,711 65,971,043 7,039,221 73,599,447 Funds remaining (or deficient) $ 5,282,200 28,821,991 596,105 0 28,225,886 Cost to authority Price paid by developer `Real estate sales Retail and theater site $ 3,213,720 3,213,720 Medical office site 815,092 815,092 Office site 1,107,160 1,107,160 Office building #1 449,300 449,300 Office building #2 1,280,702 1,280,702 Office building #3 1,341,533 1,341,533 Office building #4 1,625,849 1,625,849 Office building #5 1,803,714 1,803,714 $ 11,637,070 11,637,070 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Schedule of Sources and Uses of Public Funds for 70th Street and Cahill Road District -No. 1207, a Tax Increment Financing District (Unaudited - see accompanying auditors' report) December 31, 2000 Sources of funds: Bond proceeds Tax increments received Interest on invested funds Other Total sources of funds Uses of funds: Land acquisition Installation of public utilities and improvements Demolition Relocation Capitalized Interest Debt service Administrative costs Total uses of funds Funds remaining (or deficient) Page 131 Table 20 Accounted Original Amended for in Current Amount budget budget prior years year remaining $ 1,911,000 1,911,000 0 0 1,911,000 2,177,855 2,177,855 746,863 0 1,430,992 0 0 44,242 36,143 (80,385) 0 0 0 0 0 4,088,855 4,088,855 791,105 36,143 3,261,607 529,400 529,400 0 0 529,400 325,000 325,000 89,468 0 235,532 150,000 150,000 0 0 150,000 160,000 160,000 0 0 160,000 150,000 150,000 0 0 150,000 2,178,455 2,178,455 0 0 2,178,455 596,000 596,000 22,143 34,658 539,199 4,088,855 4,088,855 111,611 34,658 3,942,586 $ 0 0 679,494 1,485 (680,979) ovte REPORUREC OMMENDATION To: Mayor Maetzold and members of Agenda Item the Edina City Council. ° From: John Keprios, Director Consent ❑ Park & Recreation Department Information Only Date: June 12, 2001 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Results of Braemar Golf Course ❑ Motion Driving Range Study. ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion RECOMMENDATION: It is staff's recommendation that the Braemar Golf Course driving range remain in its current configuration. Staff will continue efforts to provide a high quality driving range product and service that meets or exceeds our customers' expectations. INFO/BACKGROUND: In response to City Council's concerns about the efficiency, quality and capacity of the Braemar Golf Course driving range, Braemar Golf Course staff have studied the issue and have addressed a number of options. The staff approached the issue under the assumption that the main concern is to increase driving range capacity and resulting revenues. Staff also assumed that the goal is to ensure that any additional revenues from an expansion of the driving range should more than cover any construction costs plus make up for loss of revenues in other areas as a result of the expansion. Driving Range Expansion Options: 1. ELIMINATE DRIVING RANGE BUILDING AND PRACTICE GREEN. 2 The existing volume of traffic for both the driving range and the executive course require a building "on site." In excess of 40,000 balls are sold during a busy day. The logistics of the retrieving, washing, and selling this many balls and greens fees requires a structure near the range and executive course. The existing building cost $270,000 in 1987. A new structure would probably be in excess of $500,000. In addition, customers would not be well served if they had to walk up to the pro shop and back to the driving range. The existing practice green is used heavily and would need to be replaced. 2. ALLOW PUBLIC TO HIT FROM TEACHING TEE (NORTH END). Allowing the public to hit from the existing teaching tee poses several safety and liability issues. Depending on the south end tee line placement and wind direction, the other end of the range is very reachable by long hitters. Our pros currently make sure that their students are in a safe position and also are not hitting into the public on the other end. Supervision by staff would be necessary at all times, especially to prevent the public from trying to retrieve range balls in front of the tee line. This tee is currently used for group and private lessons, which are generally during the busiest times of the range, after work hours. Limited flight balls might help reduce the risk but, generally are not well liked by most golfers. 3. CONVERT EXECUTIVE COURSE INTO A PAR 3 COURSE. Converting the executive course into a par 3 would allow tee line expansion to the east, although it would be limited because of the pond next to the current first hole. The orientation would need to be directly north to avoid hitting into the first fairway of the regulation course. The cost of construction and the reduced revenues of a par 3 would have to be weighed against potential revenue increases by the driving range. Average Buckets Sold Average Executive Rounds June 555 211 July 480 213 August 411 187 Buckets sold does not reflect range balls for lessons or junior programs. 4. INTEGRATE EXECUTIVE COURSE INTO CLUNIE NINE -HOLE COURSE. This would again allow expansion to the east, with the same safety concerns. The loss of the executive course would displace customers as Fred Richards Golf Course would not be able to accommodate the overflow. The Clunie nine could be made more "player friendly." Again the cost of construction and loss of executive course revenues would have to be weighed against potential driving range and Clunie nine revenue increases. 5. CONVERT FRED RICHARDS COURSE TO A DRIVING RANGE. Converting the Fred Richards Executive Golf Course into a driving range would be difficult because of the limitations of the existing site configuration. There is not sufficient depth or width to safely place a driving range without extremely cost - prohibitive netting. 6. BUILD A DOUBLE -DECK HITTING AREA. A double deck would allow increased volume at peak times, however, it would also require customers to only hit off mats. ' Most would also consider the aesthetics of a double deck unpleasant. Another concern would be the safety of children and adults hitting golf balls from an elevated platform. In other words, there would always be a concern for patrons who could possibly fall from that open elevated platform. 7. CONVERT AN EXISTING PARK TO A DRIVING RANGE. To convert an existing park, such as Pamela Park, into a driving range, would create income from a park that is currently not generating revenues. However, it would require displacement or elimination of an existing park use which would generate considerable opposition from those current park users. This would also result in competing with ourselves. In other words, the issue becomes whether there is enough business to support two municipal driving ranges in the City of Edina. 8. PROVIDE LIGHTING TO EXTEND HOURS. Providing lighting to extend operating hours would have the greatest effect on business in the spring, which is when demand is high and the daylight hours are short compared to mid- summer days. In mid - summer, the Braemar Driving Range is open up to 14.75 hours per day. As the days get shorter in late summer, the demand for the range also decreases. Issues to address would be mosquito control after dark and neighborhood opposition to the lighting. The lights would have to remain on for the range balls to be picked. STAFF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS In the view of the Braemar staff, the current driving range serves customers well, is heavily used, and financially sound. The aesthetics of the range blend in well with the other golf course facilities. Any large scale reconstruction would need to factor the ever - changing golf business environment and the potential of revenues not substantially increasing and/or not recovering construction'costs. We can generate potential additional dollars, however, the question becomes, "at what cost ?" It is staff's recommendation that the driving range remain in its current configuration and not be expanded. If the City Council would like to further discuss or pursue this issue, staff recommends that it be placed on a future agenda and invite Braemar Golf Course Manager, John Valliere, and Assistant Golf Course Manager, Todd Anderson, to give a presentation. 5145 Eden Avenue South MINNESOTA WANNER COMPANY Minneapolis, Minnesota 55436 Phone: 952 - 929 -1070 June 11, 2001 Mr. Timothy Murnene Vice President, General Manager Real Estate Development Opus Northwest, L.L.C. P.O. Box 59110 Minneapolis, MN 55459 -0110 Re: Minnesota Wanner Property 5145 Eden Ave. S. Edina, MN Dear Mr Murnane: I have received a copy of your May 31, 2001 letter to my attorney, Bruce Malkerson. I understand it to be in response to your conversation with Bruce concerning our fears and concerns and the letter I had sent to the City and copied to representatives in your company. In your letter you stated that Opus is not interested in pursuing the redevelopment of our property at this time, but will continue its efforts on adjacent property. I also understand that you will be advising the City of this immediately. Based upon your statements to Bruce, I will no longer be pursuing discussions with the City Council members. I have known of your company and have always had respect situation and your response positive feelings I have had Sincerely, Thomas Wanner President and its principals for many years for both. Your understanding of our to our concerns reinforces the for your company. cc: Mayor and City Council Gordon Hughes, City Manager Tom Lund, Opus Gerald Rauenhorst, Opus Mark Rauenhorst, Opus Reverend Robert Cassidy, Our Lady of Grace Bruce Malkerson, Attorney for Minnesota Wanner Company EDINA PARK BOARD 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS MAY 8, 2001 MEMBERS PRESENT: Tom White, Floyd Grabiel, Dave Fredlund, Karla Sitek, Andy Finsness, Mike Damman, Ardis Wexler MEMBERS ABSENT: Linda Presthus, John Murrin, George Klus STAFF PRESENT: John Keprios, Ed MacHolda, Janet Canton OTHERS PRESENT: Doug Nessan, Art Cobb, Amy Demarest, Bill Moir, Brad Bolin, Susie Baker, Bob Mayo, Bright Dornblaser I. APPROVAL OF THE APRIL 10, 2001 PARK BOARD MINUTES Floyd Grabiel MOVED TO APPROVE THE APRIL 10, 2001 PARK BOARD MINUTES. Mike Damman SECONDED THE MOTION. MINUTES APPROVED. II. PRIORITY USE OF EDINA'S SCHEDULED OUTDOOR ATHLETIC FACILITIES Mr. Keprios thanked all of the representatives from the athletic associations who were in attendance at the Park Board meeting. Mr. Keprios explained that the reason the Park Board has been looking at having this document for the last couple of months is because there have been some problems in the past. He indicated that a few years ago a group of soccer players demanded access to facilities that already had soccer scheduled there and were told that the Edina Soccer Association had priority. He stated that they asked to see it in writing to which it became an issue because there wasn't anything in writing and therefore they didn't have anything to fall back on. Mr. Keprios indicated that they are likely to run into something like this again and would like there to be something in writing. Mr. Keprios indicated that the document would only refer to the outdoor scheduled facilities such as football, soccer, rugby, lacrosse, baseball and outdoor hockey rinks. He noted that the reason they included hockey is because there has been a lot of interest in outdoor ice time by groups other than the Edina Hockey Association. Mr. Keprios explained that there was a time when a group wanted to form their own hockey association because they didn't like the way one of the hockey levels was formed and were demanding equal ice time. Mr. Keprios went through the document and pointed out a few items that he felt should be addressed. He noted that the first item is #5 on page two which states "The election of the organization's governing body is to be a process which is open to all program participants ". He indicated that currently most boards elect their incoming board members just by vote of the current board members and therefore he would like to hear some input from the associations on this issue. Mr. Keprios indicated that it was brought to his attention that Priority #2 would be an issue for the Edina Hockey Association because at the National level there is a U19 program for the girls. Therefore, he noted that he doesn't see a problem in revising the age from 18 to 19. Mr. Keprios pointed out that on page 4, item #6 the word personal should read personnel. He also noted that there may be some discussion from the Park Board regarding priority #4 and priority #5. Park Board Chairman, Tom White, stated that the Park Board doesn't really have a lot of contact with the athletic associations, however, the Park Board sees itself as the supervisor of the athletic associations. He indicated that he hopes the associations haven't felt like the Park Board has been micromanaging them because that is not their intention. Mr. White pointed that they would like to have a policy in place in case another situation comes up such as those in the past. Therefore, he noted that the Park Board would like to hear some input from the athletic associations. Art Cobb, Edina Hockey Association (EHA) board member, indicated that the Hockey Board felt the policy read very well, has a nice criteria and does fit Edina hockey. However, he would like to comment on a couple of things. First, as Mr. Keprios pointed out, the girls hockey program does have a U19 team and therefore the age would need to read 19 years of age instead of 18 years of age. He also noted that on page 3 at the bottom there is no number two, it goes from one to three so that needs to be corrected. Mr. Cobb informed the Park Board that in relation to page 6 where it talks about racial, ethnic, religious, etc. names he noted that EHA does use NHL teams and therefore one of teams is called the Blackhawks. He stated that if this is a problem for anyone it is obviously very easy to fix. Mr. Cobb explained that EHA never had a democratic election until three or four years ago. At that time the EHA received some extreme pressure from USA Hockey and Minnesota Hockey saying that in order to continue the sanction they had to have a democratic election. Therefore, they have changed their format and now hold a democratic election. 2 Amy Demarest, President of the Edina Girls Athletic Association (EGAA), indicated that the EGAA board briefly went through the document and noted that as far as holding an election they are lucky to have enough board members. Basically anyone who wants to be on the board can be. Ms. Demarest asked about publicizing their board meetings and asked if that is something Park and Recreation would do for them on the City web site because EGAA does not have a web site. Mr. Keprios responded that the City can definitely do that for them. Ms. Demarest commented about the open process for parents to discuss their concerns and recommend changes to the organization and asked how formal of a policy is the Park Board looking for. Mr. Keprios replied they just want to be sure that the athletic association meetings are open to the public and if anyone comes forward with any ideas or suggestions the associations at least need to hear them out. Ms. Demarest indicated that EGAA is also concerned about page 5, #3, where it states "If teams or organizations are at the same priority level, then the team or organization that serves the highest number of Edina residents will receive the higher priority status in terms of field, rink and court reservations ". She noted that they are concerned about their flag football because they will never have the same amount of participants as the boys flag football program. It was then explained that it is not the number-of participants but the percentage of Edina residents. It was noted that point will need to be clarified. Mr. Cobb indicated that on page 4, item 5 it states "Association is open to all Edina residents and must offer equal opportunities for participant." He stated that from time to time they have had to exclude kids from hockey because of ability. He also commented that they have also had situations where a 13 year -old announces that he wants to play hockey for the.first time and noted he will get hurt and therefore they cannot offer them the same opportunity to play. Mr. Keprios asked if for the kids who get cut there is still a program where they can be placed to which Mr. Cobb replied no. Mr. Cobb explained that a couple of years ago because of a structure mistake they had to cut 9 kids. However, ultimately they did find a place for 6 of them to play in St. Louis Park. He noted that chances are this is a situation that will happen again in the future. Mr. Keprios stated that he agrees you cannot have 22 kids on a hockey team and you cannot have 8 kids either. He asked Mr. Cobb if he would be willing to help him with language so that they can find some middle ground to which Mr. Cobb replied yes. Bill Moir, Edina Soccer Club Board member, reminded everyone that the Soccer Club is a traveling program and that the caliber of athletes are typically a little more skilled and dedicated. Mr. Moir explained that not everyone who tries out for the Soccer Club makes a team. For the kids who do not make a team their application is passed on to the Edina Soccer Association which is the recreational house league program. Mr. Moir pointed out that the Soccer Club does recruit players from the outside, they are allowed a specific number of non - resident players. He noted that they start recruiting players at age I 1 on up. However, when they get into the premier level teams, which are the elite players, they need to maintain a certain record in order to maintain the premier status. Mr. Moir pointed out that the Soccer Club is very serious. Mr. Keprios asked if the governing body at the state level are the ones who determine how many non - residents a city can draw from. Mr. Moir responded that at one time they did, however, that is not the case anymore. Mr. MacHolda pointed out that traveling soccer at both the state level and national level encourage ability based teams not community based teams. He indicated that with soccer there are two options, the traveling player that aspires to be premier Classic I and doesn't make it in Edina can try in a different town or they can drop down a level. Mr. Moir commented there is always a place to play soccer because there is the recreational house program. Mr. Moir commented that the Soccer Club is very concerned about the condition of the soccer fields. He noted that some clubs did not want to play in Edina last year because the fields were so torn up and not safe., Doug Nessan, Edina Football Association President, explained that their program is for grades 2nd through 8`h. He noted that the 2nd and 3rd graders play flag football, 0' through 6`h play in an in -house tackle program and 7`h and 8`h graders play in a southwestern 11- man football league. He indicated that there are approximately 600 to 650 participants in the football program and that their season is ten weeks long. Mr. Nessan stated that they are very fortunate to have such good participation as well as help from Mr. MacHolda on field scheduling. Mr. Nessan suggested that perhaps as part of the scheduling arrangement for the athletic associations there should be a mandatory meeting. This meeting would give the associations a chance to work out scheduling issues especially if fields end up getting pulled out of use the next couple of years. Mr. Nessan indicated that the football program primarily uses the city facilities and they seldom use school facilities. Mr. White commented that he thinks that is a great idea and definitely something to think about. Mr. MacHolda indicated that priority #8 is priority #2 only in a second season and noted that both recreational soccer and traveling soccer play a second season, the same season as football's only season. He stated that the fields need some time to rest we can't keep playing on them from the time the snow melts until it falls.again. There needs to be a balance of when the associations play. Mr. Keprios stated that the intent of the document is multiple. Number one is to protect the associations by being incorporated which offers some immunity by State law, number two is to protect our fields, and also define who has priority access to these public facilities. Also, it clearly states that we are in the business to provide recreational opportunities for residents, not non - residents. Brad Bolin, Edina Girls Fastpitch President, explained that their only concern is they are a small organization (approximately 80 participants) and are only 20% to 25% of the slow pitch program and they want to make sure that they are able to maintain the amount of 4 space that they need. Mr. White indicated that it isn't the intent of the document to squeeze out any organization but that they are trying to set up a priority. Mr. Keprios noted that on May 23rd at 6:00 p.m. the Local Government Information Systems (LOGIS) office in Golden Valley is going to offer a presentation on a software package where all of the associations could have their participants register on -line or by touch -tone phone. Ultimately it would be handled by the Park and Recreation staff. He added that there are a number of things that this software is capable to doing. Mr. Keprios indicated that he will see if there is enough interest from the athletic associations to do this. Dave Fredlund MOVED TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL THE PROPOSED PRIORITY USE OF EDINA'S SCHEDULED OUTDOOR ATHLETIC FACILITIES AND RECOMMENDED GUIDELINES SUBJECT TO SOME GRAMMATICAL CHANGES. Mike Damman SECONDED THE MOTION. Mr. White pointed that it still needs to be decided on how we should handle the associations that cut kids. Ms. Sitek commented that when Mr. Cobb referred to kids that were cut a few years ago there was a place for them to go which was with kids from St. Louis Park. However, that wasn't acceptable to everyone. Mr. Keprios indicated that he would like to work out some language that would basically state that none of the associations will accept non - resident talent at the expense of Edina talent. For example, an association cannot take a non - resident player because they are a better player therefore leaving a resident player with no place to play. If an association accepts non - residents, there always needs to be a place at some level for the resident player to play. Mr. White stated that currently on page 4, priority #2, part 5 states "Association is open to all Edina residents and must offer equal opportunities for participation ". He suggested that it read "The associations must offer all Edina residents an opportunity to participate in the sport at some level ". Mr. Keprios suggested that it read "The associations need to make every effort possible to provide an opportunity for Edina residents ". Mr. Grabiel commented that the document is not going to be able to cover absolutely every situation that can be thought of. He noted that the park and recreation staff is paid to exercise their discretion and as a board member he has full faith and confidence in the staff's abilities. Mr. White noted that he would like to make an amendment which states THE ASSOCIATIONS ARE OPEN TO ALL EDINA RESIDENTS AND MUST OFFER EDINA RESIDENTS SOME OPPORTUNITY TO PARTICIPATE IN THE SPORT. Andy Finsness SECONDED THE AMENDMENT. VOTE ON THE AMENDMENT, ALL IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION BY DAVID FREDLUND TO ADOPT IT SUBJECT TO SOME GRAMMATICAL CHANGES. Mr. White noted he would also like to make some grammatical changes. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY III. RECREATIONAL FACILITIES REFERENDUM UPDATE - JOHN KEPRIOS Mr. Keprios indicated that a wonderful job was done in endorsing the referendum in the Sun Current Newspaper last week. He noted that John Sherman also spoke highly of it. Mr. Keprios stated that there is a lot of Vote Yes support out there, however, it's definitely not a.slam dunk, it's going to be a close election and there is a lot of Vote No signs out there as well. Mr. Keprios stated that if the referendum passes he would ask the Park Board to play a very important role of helping to prioritize what gets done first, second, third, etc. He noted that staff will have recommendations but that they would like help from the Park Board. IV. OTHER A. Park Board Tour - Mr. Keprios indicated that for the June 12`h Park Board meeting they will be taking a tour and asked if the Park Board would like to start earlier to which it was noted it will remain a 7:00 p.m. start from City Hall with the first stop being the Aquatic Center. Mr. Keprios then asked the Park Board for suggestions of what else they would like to see on their tour. Mr. Finsness indicated he would like to see some of the problem areas to which Mr. MacHolda noted that Concord would be a good place because the green space is in terrible condition. However, the area right next to it between South View and the Community Center is a gorgeous green space and noted that the City is not allowed to use. The Park Board agreed they would rather see the problem areas. Mr. Keprios indicated that he will adjust the tour to show some of the problem areas such as Lewis Park, the High School and Braemar Park. B. Iron Kids Triathlon - Mr. Keprios indicated that on Sunday August 19`h they are hoping to host the Iron Kid's Triathlon special event. It's a swim, bike and run event for kids and they are currently in the process of seeing what kind of support they are going to get from the resident neighbors of the area. It was noted that the event is for 7 to 14 year - olds. C. Braemar Gun Range Site - Mr. Finsness asked what the status is on the Park Board's recommendation regarding the Braemar Gun Range site. Mr. Keprios indicated that they have not yet seen the recommendation but will see it in the May Park Board minutes at the next City Council meeting. He noted there was only enough time between the Park Board meeting and City Council meeting to have the dog park part of the minutes done. He noted that the City Council accepted the Park Board's recommendation as well as added the amendment to continue to look at the Braemar site as a potential dog park site. V. ADJOURNMENT Ardis Wexler MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 8:30 P.M. Karla Sitek SECONDED THE MOTION. MEETING ADJOURNED. Ok e+ t, Cn O o• '�COAPJMTi City of Edina June 6, 2001 Kolleen and Dave Sogard 5809 Concord Avenue Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Sogard: Thank you for your letter of May 14, 2001, concerning MTC bus routes in your neighborhood. At last night's City Council meeting, the City Council adopted a resolution requesting that Metro Transit eliminate the routing of buses along Concord Avenue and re- establish the routes and pick -up locations on the east side of the Community Center where previously located. We understand that the Edina School District has taken a similar action. We hope that MTC will respond positively to our request. Thanks again for sharing your thoughts with us. Sincerely, Gordon L. Hughes City Manager GLH /dw cc: Edina City Council V` City Hall (952) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (952) 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (952) 826 -0379 d • / C�oaroF 1F� June 6, 2001 Mats E. Holland 4527 Casco Ave. Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mats: Thank you for your letter concerning a hockey rink at Wooddale Park. As you may or may not know, there used to be a general skating rink at Wooddale Park over a decade ago. Over the past many years, the Edina Park Board continually voted to eliminate the numerous small general skating areas that have been located throughout the City of Edina and not add more outdoor hockey rinks for the following reasons: • The number of outdoor skating participants has been on the decline. • The Park Board prefers to have fewer rinks with a higher level of quality maintenance, as opposed to more rinks that each receive less maintenance. • With the addition of a third indoor ice area at Braemar, there is less demand for more outdoor hockey rinks. • There have been discussions to reduce the number of outdoor rinks from 10 to 4 (1 in each. quadrant of Edina) and put covers over each one to guarantee good ice and playing conditions. • There are no additional resources available to add and maintain more outdoor hockey rinks to the ten already in place (There are more parks and facilities to maintain today than there were 20 years ago, however, the number of maintenance staff has not increased). As shown above, there have been many discussions about the short and long -term plan for outdoor hockey -rinks over the past several years. The trend is towards fewer outdoor rinks and. more covered indoor rinks. Please know that we always appreciate hearing from our residents as to their concerns about recreational facilities. Thanks again for taking the time to express your views. If you have any questions, feel free to call meat 826 -0430. Many thanks. ' Ser f hn Kepri irector Edina Park and Recreation Department cc: Gordon Hughes, City Manager Mayor Dennis Maetzold & City Council City Hall (952) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (952) 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (952) 826 -0379 /o e (:.5. r,1 pi rr "CO 1e��5f ". e June 6, 2001 J Benjamin Charles Leer 5656 Woodcrest Drive Edina, MN 55424 . Dear Benjamin: Thank you for your letter concerning a hockey rink. at Wooddale Park. As you may or may not know, there used to be a general skating rink at Wooddale Park over a decade ago. Over the past many years, the Edina Park Board continually voted to eliminate the numerous small general skating areas that have been located throughout the City of Edina and. not add more outdoor hockey rinks for the following reasons: • The number of outdoor skating participants has been on the decline. • The Park Board prefers to have fewer rinks with a higher level of quality maintenance, aq opposed to more rinks that each receive less maintenance. • With the addition of 'a. third indoor ice area at Braemar, there is less demand for more outdoor hockey rinks. • There have been discussions to reduce the number of outdoor rinks from 10 to 4 (1 in. each quadrant of Edina) and put covers over each one to guarantee good ice and playing conditions. • There are no additional resources available to add and maintain more outdoor hockey rinks to the ten already in place (There are more parks and facilities to maintain today than there were 20. years ago, however, the number of maintenance staff has not increased). As shown above, there have been many discussions about the short and long -term plan for outdoor hockey rinks over the past several years. The. trend is towards fewer outdoor rinks and more covered indoor rinks. Please know that we..always appreciate hearing from our residents as to their. concerns about recreational facilities. Thanks again for taking the time to express your views. If you have any questions, feel free to call me at 826 -0430. Many thanks. ly, Kepri. ,Director Edina Park and Recreation. Department. cc: Gordon Hughes, City Manager Mayor Dennis Maetzold & City Council City Hall (952) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (952) 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (952) 826 -0379 maria fesenmaier ghughes @ci.edina.mn.us; dmaetzold @ci.edina.mn.us ubject: Metro bus issue Gordon and Mayor Maetzold, I am looking for status on the Metro Bus issue that was presented to the City Council on-6 /05/01. The request for assistance was made by myself, on behalf of the neighborhood association that I represent, and one of the members - Ryan Langsev. At the meeting, we presented our request, and the council voted unanimously to pass a resolution to have the bus line moved, and the Park and Ride availability's revoked ( the parking lot next to Southview Middle school) immediately. This bus route is on the Southview Lane /Concord Avenue path. The bus company, specifically Dick Loeffler, indicated a new site /route was chosen that involved the Colonial church. This was confirmed by Fran Hoffman who was at the meeting. They indicated the bus company wanted to complete this end of June and we were of the understanding after the vote, it would be made priority for the safety of the residents, to happen ASAP. Saturday morning, representatives from the bus company came and removed the signs. We did not see any busses all day. None on Sunday. The streets were quieter. The streets were safer. Children laughed and played. The neighbors celebrated. They started to draft a 'Thank You" letter to the Council....... Monday morning came along, and just after six in the morning, along came the first bus. Along came the persons parking in the lot and riding the bus. They also were dropped off, only to stand on the edge of our yards and wait for the buses, on the corners where there are no bus stop signs. Ionday night came; same, scenario. Even during thunderstorms and hail........ they came, they stopped in the middle of .e :streets..... What can we do? How can we help? What is the city going to do? When will the buses leave this area? I look forward to your prompt reolv(s). Sincerely, l/ljy� pub Maria Fesen President ECC Neighborhood Association www.eccneighborhood.com PO Box 24543 Edina MN 55424 763.591.4106 CC: 'ke Kelly ,cott Housh Jim Hovland Linda Masica Fran Hoffman r, v 0 � Children's Exposure to Pesticides * Children 'are likely to be exposed at a higher level than adults for several reasons: they spend more time indoors, live closer to the ground, put more non- food material in their mouths and have higher respiration rates than adults. (Wargo, John, Our Children's Toxic Legacy, 1997) * Children are more susceptible to pesticides for a number of reasons: they take in more pesticides relative to body weight, have developing organ systems that are more vulnerable and less able to detoxify chemicals. (Calabreses, E.J., Age an usceptibility to Toxic Substances, 1986, Paigen, B., "Children and Toxic Chemicals" Journal of Pesticide Reform, Summer 1986) * A fundamental maxim of pediatric medicine is that children are not "little adults." Profound differences exist between chi ldre nd adults in terms of metabolic rates and ability to detoxify and excrete toxic substances. There is no simple way to predict sensitivity to chemical compounds in infants and children from data derived entirely from adult humans or from toxicity testing in adult or adolescent animals. (Natii �searc� il, Pesticides in the Diets of Infants and '-- Children, 1993) * Studies show that children living in households where pesticides are used suffer elevated rates of leukemia brain cancer and soft tissue sarcoma. ( "Childhood Leukemia and Parents' Occupational and Home Exposures," Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1987, "Home Pesticide Use and Childhood Cancer: A Case - Control Study," American Journal of Public Health, 1995) * Today, a newborn child faces a risk of about 1 in 600 of contracting cancer by age 10. (U.S. Reshaping Cancer Strategy as Incidence in Children Rises," New York Times, Sept. 29, 1997.) * In the United States, cancer is diagnosed each year in an. estimated 9,000 children below the as a of 14. according to the EPA. Although cancer kills fewer children than accidents do, it is the most common form of fatal childhood disease, accounting for about 10 percent of all deaths in childhood. * While cancer rates have been rising, an estimated 75 000 new synthetic chemicals have been introduced over the last 50 years. (U.S. Reshaping Cancer Strategy as Incidence in Children Rises," New York Times, Sept. 29, 1997.) 9 * The probability of an effect such. as cancer, which requires a period of time to develop after exposure, is enhanced if exposure occurs early in life. (Vasselinovitch, S.D., et al, "Neoplastic Response of Mouse Tissues During Perinatal Age Periods and Its Significance in Chemical Carcinogenesis," Perinatal Carcinogenesis, National Cancer Institute Monograph 51, 1979) Did You Know... Children exposed to pesticides risk cancer. A study of 500 I! children in Denver found that in homes where pesticides were used, -children were more likely to develop leukemia, brain tumors, lymphoma and other cancers. In fact, a total of 20 studies from across the country in the peer- reviewed literature document a relationship between exposure to pesticides and increased risk of cancer in children. The food that you and your family eat has cancer - causing pesticide residues. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency lists 65 pesticides currently used on food crops as possible, probable, or known cancer - causing agents. For infants exposure to such dangerous chemicals is largely through baby food. A„OW The drinking water of 15 million Americans is contaminated with pesticides according to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency estimates. Over 50 pesticides in use today are known to disrupt sperm, production or male fertility; sperm counts in healthy men around the world have fallen 50% in the last 50 years. Of the 36 most commonly used lawn pesticides, 24 have never been fully tested by-ELM. At least 13 can cause cancer, J4 can cause birth defects, 21 can cause central nervous system damage, and 15 can damage the liver and kidneys. EPA relies on industry funded tests. EPA has never inspected ' three- quarters of the labs doing manufacturer - funded studies even though EPA relies on those data to evaluate pesticide hazards. Outri ght fraud has occurred. In 1994, Craven Labora- tories was fined over $15 million and its president sentenced to five years in prison for falsifying pesticide residue data. -�— - Northwest Coalition for Altematives to Pesticides. PO Box 1393. Eugene, OR 974,40 (541) 141 -5044 * Ksticide. 1'crnlizer mixes linked to range of health problems r 11,11! Ian l'NMRSI'rY os. WISCONSIN M A 0121 S U X Search More New-; - I eamme - Kescareh - (M t'amnus - Campus Iswes - A%\ards 1 Minor http://www.ncws.wisc.eLiuithisweek/Rcscarch/Bio/Y99/pestic atcd regul:arl; N EWS@ UW- MADI;SON Office of News and Public Affairs - RESEARC'11-- 1-•nvironmental toxicolop Pesticide, fertilizer mixes linked to range of health problems (posted 3/15/99) The natural mix of chemical pesticides and fertilizers, such as occurs when agricultural chemicals seep into groundwater, may have a broad range of effects on human and animal health. a new study shows. - \rchi\cd Nc\as The study, published in the current issue of the journal Toxicology a_n_d Industrial Health_, suggests that com inations of commonly used agricultural chemicals, I'uhhc \iYairs in concentrations that mirror levels found in groundwater, can si,-,nificantly influence the immune and endocrine I or Neu: Media ` systems as well as neurological health. \cws Kcicascs Conducted over five years, the*study of mice suggests The ex eriments I M Nc\ti.makcre pert rmed by__ Porter's that current methods used by group suggest that i:vcnts the Environmental Protection children and the Calendar Agency (EPA) and others for s the toxic effects of developing fetus are yin most at risk from the Offiercamous low- levels of pesttctdes may ""' pesticide - fertilizer news be flawed. .-- mixtures. Their influence on "The single most important developing finding of the study is that Get neurological, common mixtures, not the endocrine and your standard immune snu s tems, said _ one-chemical-at -a -time Porter, portend e periments, caii show change in ability to • biolos;ical effects at current learn and in patterns concentrations in of aggression. groundwater," said Warren P. o__the lead author of the study and a UW- Madison Here's ho professor of zoology and environmental toxicology. Although used worldwide, "tests for these compounds in combination are very rare, although they frequently co- occur." The experiments performed by Porter'sgroup suggest that children and the develping ofet re most at risk from the 6�k�- - esticide, fertilizer mixes linked to ranee of health problems http :;.•• . news. wise .cdu /thisweek/RcsearchrBio /lr. c�cide- fertilizer mixtures. Their influence on developing neurological, endocrine and immune systems. said Porter, portend change in ability to learn.and in patterns of aggression. The privately funded Wisconsin study focused on three commonly used farm chemicals: aldicarb, an insecticide: atrazine. a herbicide. and nitrate, a chemical fertilizer. All three are in wide use worldwide and are the most ubiquitous contaminants of groundwater in the United States. In the series of experiments, when mice were given drinking water laced with combinations of pesticides and nitrate, they exhibited altered immune, endocrine and ii-e ry u s system functions. Those changes, according to Porter, occurred at concentrations currently found in groundwater. Effects were most noticeable when a single pesticide was combined with nitrate fertilizer. This was true for herbicide as well as insecticide, said Porter, and chips awav at the notion that herbicides have no significant influence on animals. "Herbicides can have neurological impacts and hormonal iimpi t immune impacts," he said. "They are no he harmless chemicals t ey are sometimes portrayed to be. They can a every bit as biologically active as insecticides or fungicides." The apparent influence of pesticide and fertilizer mixtures on the endocrine system -- the system of glands such as the thyroid that secrete hormones into the bloodstream -- may have a casca a effect, spilling over to the immune system and affecting fetal brain development. "Thyroid disruption in humans has multiple cons es," Porter said. Some of t ese include effects on brain development, level of irritability, sensitivity to stimuli, ability or motivation to learn. and altered immune function. A curious finding of the study is that animals may be more vulnerable to the influence o rs chemicals depending on the time of year: "Our current king hypothesis is that animals are seasonally vulnerable because of subtle modulation of natural seasonal variation in hormone levels, according to Porter. "For example, thyroid hormone level varies seasonally and we have now shown that two different chemical mixtures will modulate 4/12199 8:43 Ac. Icrttlizer mixes linked to range of health problems htrp: / /www. news. wisc. cduithisweek /Research/Bio /Y99 /pcstic thyroid hormone levels." The new study, Porter contends, adds to a growing body of evidence deence that current testing methods required for the registration and use of chemical pesticides are fundamental • wed. In da ditty on to a lack of testing of com inations of chemical compounds. Porter said there is a narrow focus on looking principally for carcinogenic effects or obvious cell mutations. Neurological, immune and endocrine tests fog pesticides have been mandated by federal law for almost three years, but there has been no enforcement of these laws, Porter said. "Toxicological te5-tiag so far has been extremelylimited in scope and focused on mechanisms that require extensive mutations or cell damage to show any effects. They do not adequately assess the potential for biological effects under real world exposure scenarios." Co- authors of the paper include James W. Jaeger of the UW- Madison Department of Zoology, and fan H. Carlson of the Endocrinology Laboratory, University of Wisconsin Hospital. Maintained by Office nfNews and Public Affairs Send questions or comments to l;W- news(a)facstaff.wisc.edu Copyright ca 1999 The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System. ��CC 3 of 3 A111100 9.A2 iae. lcrulizer mixes linked to range of health problems hirp: / /www. news. wise. cduithisweek /Research/Bio /Y99 /per1icI thyroid hormone levels." ►` he new study, Potter contends, adds to a growing body o vidence that current testing methods required for the registration and use of chemical pesticides are funds entally flawed. In addition to a lack oWting of combing ons of chemical compounds, Po r said there is a narrow us on looking principally f carcinogenic effects or ob 'ous cell mutations. Neurological, imm a and endoc ' e tests for pesticides have been mandated federal Jaw for almost three years. but there has been no en rcem/ent of these laws, Porter said. "Toxicological testing/6 far Ma een extremely limited in scope and focused/on mechanis s that require extensive mutati9lifs. or cell damaLe show any effects. Thev do not ad quately assess the pot ntial for biological effects under cal world exposure seen ios." Co- authpfs of the paper include Jamcs . W aeger of the UW- Madison Department of Zoology, and n H. Carlson of the Endocrinology Laboratory, University f )VIsconsin Hospital. Maintained by Office ofNews and Public Affairs Send questions or comments to UW- news4i)facstaff.wisc.edu Copyright (a 1999 The Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System. 3 of a/17/oo R•43 . JOURNAL OF PESTICIDE REFORM / SUMMER 1996 - VOL. 16, NO. 2 •NEWS F R O M A R O U N D Mox� - _ _ - ICIDE Use; Moxju Bax DEFEM Extensive scientific research has indicated that some of the ingredients in widely -used commercial pesticides contribute to the deve opment of a Vie-9tening array of health problems: eukemia, breast and testicular cancers, and lowered sperm counts. The relationship o pesticide exposure to yet another problem, i e ects, —s-Fe subject of a recent stu y conducted by researchers from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the University of Minnesota. The study concluded that human birth defect rates are high in children whose fa- thers are exposed to pesticides. The study surveyed Minnesota's entire birth registry between 1989 and 1992 and compared_ birth defect rates among the children of people certified to apply re- stricted use pesticides on their own land (called pesticide appTiiers in this study) with rates among the state's population as a whole. The results were frighteningly clear: "Pesticide appliers had significantly more children with an anomaly [a defect] than did nonappliers." The researchers then went on to see if a similar effect could be attributed to pesti- cide exposure among Minnesota's general population. Birth data were first di- vided by geography into one of three crop regions of. Min. ne�a• They were then compared with pesticide use data from a statewide survey by the Minnesota Depart- ment of Agriculture. Again, a correlation was identified between birth defect fre- quencies and pesticides; areas with elevated levels of pesticide use registered higher birth defect rates than those reporting less use - The major crop - growing areas of the state, in which the majority of its pesticide use occurs; - registered - higher defect rates than urban and non - agricultural regions. In 0 Chris S. Brown is a student at Reed College and an intern at NCAP. practical terms this means that "families re- siding in predominantly agricultural regions of Minnesota are more likely to have chil- dren with birth anomalies." Lastly, the study examined local uses of particular pesticides and compared data on pesticide use within each county of Min- nesota with variations in the birth defect rates. The researchers' findings further specified the role played by pesticides in increasing birth defect risks. Specific chemicals were correlated with specific types of disorders. For example, high -use areas for herbicides of the chlorophenoxy family (2,4 -D and MCPA) persistently displayed above average rates of skeletal and muscular defects, and of defects in the nervous, cir- culatory, and respiratory systems. The link between chlorophenoxy exposure and these disorders was also confirmed by seasonal variations in the latter's occurrence. In re- gions where chlorophenoxies are most fre- quently used, the birth defects connected with them were found to occur most com- monly among infants conceived in spring = the season in which chlorophenoxies are routinely applied. Evidence unearthed by the Minnesota study thus speaks decisively about a con- nection between pesticides and birth de- fects. One final remark made by the research- ers helps to tie their findings into this larger context of negative pesticide repercussions: "the frequency of births among appliers (ages 15-44) in the five counties with the highest 2,4 -D herbicide /fungicide use was approxtm ely?ialf that of the general popu- lation (males ages 15-44) living in the same five -counry area." So a chemical associated with birth defects was also, incidentally, noticed to promote an additional disorder of major significance. This observation re- minds us that the plethora of pesticide -re- lated health threats are just many facets of a single underlying problem - continued pro- duction and utilization of unnecessary chemical poisons. Hopefully this problem will not have to grow much larger before the pesticide alternatives ready at hand re- ceive the popular recognition they have long deserved. —Chris S. Brown Garry, V.F. et al. 1996. Pesticide appliers, biocides, and birth defects in rural Minnesota. Environ. Health Persp. 104(4):394 -399. Frequency of Birth Defects in Minnesota (1989 -1992) Appliers 35 Pesticide General Population y 30 r 0 25 r n 20 m� om - 15 L �o a 10 r 5 Corn/Soybean Region Wheat/Mixed Crops Region (southern Minnesota) (central Minnesota) Urban/Forested Region (northern Minnesota) Garry, V.F. et al. 1996. Pesticide appliers, biocides, and birth defects in rural Minnesota. Environ. Health Persp. 104(4):394 -399. NORTHWEST COALITION FOR ALTERNATIVES TO PESTICIDES /NCAP 14 P.O. BOX 1393, EUGENE, OREGON 97440 / (541)344-5044 T•i�?i �2 � �( 1� (: iT4 6 1 Y �? ,f 'i t li4i Le � e� $ � tail Gs5 3 �W Leukemia and Lyrnphuma Recognize The Signs Prompt diagnosis can enhance successful treatment of leukemia, lymphoma and myeloma. Consult your doctor if any of the following signs persist: • Anemia • Pain in joints or bones • Excessive bleeding • Recurrent infection • Chronic fatigue • Swelling of lymph nodes • Recurrent fever • Weakness / Unexplained back or bone pain J r Beware Of Environmental Factors , Studies by governmental and other reputable agencies have shown an association between some tvpes of leukemia and lymphoma and certain environmental factors. Be aware of and How your dollars help... Our mission includes the best possible use of the money you give us. We are proud tat aver three- quarters of your donation goes to program services: P!pgrram Services Research Support 28.8% Patient & Community Services 27.7% Public Health Education 15.5% Professional Education 5.20/6 Supporting Services Management & General 82 Fund Raising 14.60/6 (Fiscal '98) FOR INFORMATION OR Q � National Nei,11moca L:ampalgns � ASSISTANCE CALL 'G ia a Two Gateway Center, 13 North 1- BOD- 955-4LSA society of america 4112395.2 Ism Leukemia Society of America • Home Office • 600 Third Avenue • New York. New York 10016 • 1.800. 955 -4LSA Funds sent in response to this solicitation will be used to further the Society's mission. A copy of the Society's mission may be obtained by writing to the above address. Contributions to the Society are lax deductible under section 509(a)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code. A copy of the Society's latest audited financial statements and other information may be obtained by contacting the Society at the above address. In addition: Arizona - a copy of the official registrabon may obtained from the Secretary of Stale of Arizona. 1700 W. Washington, 71h Floor, Phoenix. AZ 85007. Florida - A COPY OF THE be OFFICIAL REGISTRATION AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DIVISION OF CONSUMER SERVICES BY CALLING TOLL -FREE (1. 800 - 435.7352) WITHIN THE STATE.' Maryland - Copies of all documents and information submitted under the Charitable Solicitations Act are available from the Maryland Secretary of State. New Jersey - INFORMATION FILED WITH THE ATTORNEY GENERAL CONCERNING THIS CHARITABLE SOLICITATION MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY BY CALLING (201) 504- 6215.' New York - Upon request a copy of the last annual report tiled by the Leukemia Society may be obtained from the NYS Department of Slate. 162 Washington Avenue, Albany. NY 12231. North Carolina - A COPY OF THE LICENSE TO SOLICIT CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS AS A CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION AND FINANCIAL INFORMATION MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES, SOLICITATION LICENSING BRANCH. BY CALLING (919) 733. 4510.' Pennsylvania - A copy of the official registration and financial information may be obtained from the Pennsylvania Department of State by calling toll free, within Pennsylvania. 1.800. 732 - 0999.' Virginia - A Financial Statement is available from the State Division of Consumer Affairs in the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services upon request. Washington - A copy of the Society's current registration with the Secretary of State may be obtained from the Secretary of State at P.O. Box 40234. Olympia. WA 98504 -0234 or 1- 800 - 332.4483. West Virginia residents may obtain a summary of the registration and financial documents from the Secretary of State, State Capitol, Charleston. WV 25305.' • REGISTRATION WITH ANY STATE AGENCY DOES NOT IMPLY ENDORSEMENT, APPROVAL OR RECOMMENDATION BY THE STATE. NL -17 Beverly I Bergman 6112 Chowen Avenue South Edina, Minnesota 55410 -2724 06/11/01 Mayor Dennis Maetzold And City Council of Edina Edina Administrative Office 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Maetzold and City Council Members: On three occasions (April 4, May 2 and June 5) 1 have called the City Office (Public Works) to report the holes on the street where I live. Each time I have had an excuse of why these holes are not being repaired. Can you tell me when the street outside of my house will be repaired? Thank you. Sincerely yours, everly . Bergman D-17(L) (5 -2001) SE0001 -00748 Edina city Dennis F Maetzold Mayor 4801 W 50th Street Edina MN 55424 -1394 E1n CW �• tru of UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. Census Bureau Washington, DC 20233 -0001 OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR I am pleased to enclose Census 2000 data for your jurisdiction in the Profile of General Demographic Characteristics: Census 2000. These are the official Census 2000 population and housing counts as of April 1, 2000, for your jurisdiction (within the boundaries in effect on January 1, 2000). This product also provides information on population, families, households, and housing units. Portions of these and any additional Demographic Profiles, as well as subsequent Census 2000 products, are available on the Internet. A Profile of General Demographic Characteristics: Census 2000 is available for all states, counties, functioning minor civil divisions, places, American Indian and Alaska Native areas, the Hawaiian home lands, and municipios in Puerto Rico. These can be found at the American FactFinder Web site: <http: / /factfinder.census.gov / >. The U.S. Census Bureau will begin the release of more detailed information from Census 2000 early this summer. This set of tabulations for each state, which we call Summary File 1 or SF 1, will include total population counts for 63 races and the Hispanic or Latino population down to the census tract and block level; total population counts for selected American Indian and Alaska Native tribes and for many detailed race and Hispanic or Latino categories to the census tract level; and population and housing characteristics, such as age, sex, race, Hispanic or Latino origin, household relationship, group quarters population, household type, housing occupancy, and housing tenure. The American FactFinder Web site will provide these general demographic data for census tracts in your community during the release of SF 1. Reports, files, and other tabulations from Census 2000 also will be available through various state agencies or universities participating in our State Data Center program, or through the many public and academic libraries, Census Information Centers, and other organizations that work with the Census Bureau to disseminate information. For a list of these organizations and how to obtain Census Bureau data from them, please visit the following Web site: <http: / /www. census .gov /mso /www /npr /custinfo.html >. If you have questions, please feel free to telephone us on (301) 457 -4100. Sincerely, 7. William G. Barron, Jr. Acting Director Enclosure USCENSUSBUREAU Helping You Make Informed Decisions IIIIIII�IIIIIIIIIIIIuIIIIIIIIIIIIlOIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII www.census.gov Table DP -1. Profile of General Demographic Characteristics: 2000 ;eographic Area: Edina city, Minnesota r"or information on confidentiality protection, nonsampling error, and definitions, see text] Subject Number Percent Subject Number Percent Total population .......................... 47,425 100.0 HISPANIC OR LATINO AND RACE Total population .......................... 47,425 100.0 SEX AND AGE Hispanic or Latino (of any race) ................ 539 1.1 Male ........ ............................... 21,729 45.8 Mexican... ............................... 177 0.4 Female ...... ............................... 25,696 54.2 Puerto Rican .............................. 57 0.1 Under years .............................. 2,546 5.4 Cuban .... ............................... 39 0.1 5 to 9 years .. ............................... 3,142 6.6 Other Hispanic or Latino .................... 266 0.6 10 to 14 years ............................... 3,221 6.8 Not Hispanic or Latino ........................ 46,886 98.9 15 to 19 years .............................. 2,575 5.4 White alone ............................... 44,367 93.6 20 to 24 years ............................... 1,427 3.0 RELATIONSHIP 25 to 34 years ............................... 4,153 8.8 Total population ......................... 47,425 100.0 35 to 44 years .............................. 7,034 14.8 In households ............................... 47,135 99.4 45 to 54 years .............................. 7,552 15.9 Householder .............................. 20,996 44.3 55 to 59 years .............................. 2,684 5.7 Spouse ... ............................... 11,303 23.8 60 to 64 years .............................. 2,326 4.9 Child...... ............................... 12,586 26.5 65 to 74 years .............................. 4,776 10.1 Own child under 18 years ............... 10,586 22.3 75 to 84 years .............................. 4,405 9.3 Other relatives ............................ 737 1.6 85 years and over ........................... 1,584 3.3 Under 18 years........................ y 181 0.4 Median age ( years ) .......................... 44.5 W Nonrelatives .............................. 1,513 3.2 Unmarried partner ....................... 534 1.1 18 years and over ........................... 36,587 77.1 In group quarters ............................ 290 0.6 Male ...... ............................... 16,227 34.2 Institutionalized population.................. 262 0.6 Female .... ............................... 20,360 42.9 Noninstitutionalized population .............. 28 0.1 21 years and over ........................... 35,735 75.4 62 years and over ............................ 12,139 25.6 HOUSEHOLD BY TYPE 65 years and over ............................ 10,765 22.7 Total households ........................ 20,996 100.0 Male ....... ............................... 4,068 8.6 Family households (families) ................... 12,878 61.3 Female .... ............................... 6,697 14.1 With own children under 18 years ......... 5,569 26.5 Married - couple family ....................... 11,303 53.8 RACE With own children under 18 years .......... 4,753 22.6 One race ..... ............................... 46,917 98.9 Female householder, no husband present..... 1,226 5.8 White ...... ............................... 44,712 94.3 With own children under 18 years .......... 647 3.1 Black or African American .................. 546 1.2 Nonfamily households ....................... 81118 38.7 American Indian and Alaska Native........... 62 0.1 Householder living alone .................... 7,149 34.0 Asian ...... ............................... 1,418 3.0 Householder 65 years and over............ 3,888 18.5 Asian Indian ............................ 415 0.9 Chinese .. ............................... 386 0.8 Households with individuals under 18 years ..... 5,704 27.2 Filipino ... ............................... 85 0.2 Households with individuals 65 years and over .. 7,677 36.6 Japanese ............................... 66 0.1 Average household size...................... 2.24 (X) Korean .. ............................... 227 0.5 Average family size.......................... 2.91 (X) Vietnamese .............................. 76 0.2 Other Asian' ........................... 163 0.3 HOUSING OCCUPANCY Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander.... 14 Total housing units ....................... 21,669 100.0 Native Hawaiian .......................... 2 - Occupied housing units ....................... 20,996 96.9 Guamanian or Chamorro .................. 6 - Vacant housing units.......................... 673 3.1 Samoan ............. ................. - For seasonal, recreational, or Other PacificIslander2 .................. 6 - occasional use........................... 302 1.4 Some other race .......................... 165 0.3 Two or more races ........................... 508 1.1 Homeowner vacancy rate (percent) ............. 0.5 (X) Rental vacancy rate (percent) .................. 2.5 (X) Race alone or In combination with one or more other races: 3 HOUSING TENURE White ....... ............................... 45,144 95.2 Occupied housing units................. 20,996 100.0 Black or African American ..................... 696 1.5 Owner- occupied housing units ................. 16,072 76.5 American Indian and Alaska Native ............. 146 0.3 Renter - occupied housing units ................. 4,924 23.5 Asian ............. ...................... 1,656 3.5 Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander...... 33 0.1 Average household size of owner - occupied units. 2.42 (X) Some other race ............................. 1 2901 0.6 1 Average household size of renter - occupied units. 1 1.661 (X) - Represents zero or rounds to zero. (X) Not applicable. ' Other Asian alone, or two or more Asian categories. 2 Other Pacific Islander alone, or two or more Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander categories. 3 In combination with one or more of the other races listed. The six numbers may add to more than the total population and the six percentages may add to more than 100 percent because individuals may report more than one race. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000. U.S. Census Bureau 111111111111III II11I11111111111 11111II11111111111111111111111111111111111 About the Profile NOTE TO ALL DATA USERS To maintain confidentiality, the Census Bureau applies statistical procedures that introduce some uncertainty into data for small geographic areas. Data have not been adjusted for estimated net census coverage error based on the results of the Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation (A.C.E.). Census results contain nonsampling error. Researchers who create their own estimates using data provided by American FactFinder should cite the Census Bureau as the source of the original data only. SUBJECT DEFINITIONS Age — The age classification is based on the age of the person in complete years as of April 1, 2000. The age of the person usually was derived from their date of birth information. Average Family Size — A measure obtained by dividing the number of people in families by the total number of families (or family householders). Average Household Size —A measure obtained by dividing the number of people in households by the total number of households (or householders). Average Household Size of Owner- Occupied Units — A measure obtained by dividing the number of people living in owner - occupied housing units by the number of owner - occupied housing units. Average Household Size of Renter - Occupied Units — A measure obtained by dividing the number of people living in renter - occupied housing units by the number of renter - occupied housing units. Child — A child includes a son or daughter by birth, a stepchild, or an adopted child of the householder, regardless of the child's age or marital status. Family Household (Family) — A family includes a householder and one or more people living in the same household who are related to the householder by birth, marriage, or adoption. All people in a household who are related to the householder are regarded as members of his or her family. A family household may contain people not related to the householder, but those people are not included as part of the householder's family in census tabulations. Thus, the number of family households is equal to the number of families, but family households may include more members than do families. A household can contain only one family for purposes of census tabulations. Not all households contain families since a household may comprise a group of unrelated people or one person living alone. Female Householder, No Husband Present — A female maintaining a household with no husband of the householder present. Group Quarters Population — The group quarters population includes all people not living in households. Two general categories of people in group quarters are recognized: 1) the institutionalized population which includes people under formally authorized, supervised care or custody in institutions at the time of enumeration (such as correctional institutions, nursing homes, and juvenile institutions) and 2) the noninstitutionalized population which includes all people who live in group quarters other than institutions (such as college dormitories, military quarters, and group homes). Hispanic or Latino — People who identify with the terms "Hispanic" or "Latino" are those who classify themselves in one of the specific Hispanic or Latino categories listed on the questionnaire— "Mexican," "Puerto Rican," or "Cuban " —as well as those who indicate that they are "other Spanish, Hispanic, or Latino." Origin can be viewed as the heritage, nationality group, lineage, or country of birth of the person or the person's parents or ancestors before their arrival in the United States. People who identify their origin as Spanish, Hispanic, or Latino may be of any race. Homeowner Vacancy Rate — The homeowner vacancy rate is the proportion of the homeowner housing inventory which is vacant for sale. It is computed by dividing the number of vacant units for sale only by the sum of owner - occupied units and vacant units that are for sale only, and then multiplying by 100. (For more information, see "Vacant Housing Unit. ") us.cerw, e," A -1 Household — A household includes all of the people who occupy a housing unit. People not living in households are classified as living in group quarters. Householder — In most cases, the householder is the person, or one of the people, in whose name the home is owned, being bought, or rented and who is listed as Person 1 on the census questionnaire. If there is no such person in the household, any adult household member 15 years old and over could be designated as the householder (i.e., Person 1). Housing Unit — A housing unit may be a house, an apartment, a mobile home, a group of rooms, or a single room that is occupied (or if vacant, is intended for occupancy) as separate living quarters. Separate living quarters are those in which the occupants live separately from any other individuals in the building and which have direct access from outside the building or through a common hall. institutionalized Population — The institutionalized population includes people under formally authorized, supervised care or custody in institutions at the time of enumeration. (For more information, see "Group Quarters Population. ") Married - Couple Family — A family in which the householder and his or her spouse are enumerated as members of the same household. Median Age —The median divides the age distribution into two equal parts, one -half of the cases falling below the median age and one -half above the median. This measure is rounded to the nearest tenth. Nonfamily Household —A householder living alone or with nonrelatives only. Noninstitutionalized Population — All people who live in group quarters other than institutions. Also included are staff residing at institutional group quarters. (For more information, see "Group Quarters Population. ") Nonrelative —Any household member who is not related to the householder by birth, marriage, or adoption, including foster children. Occupied Housing Unit — A housing unit is classified as occupied if it is the usual place of residence of the person or group of people living in it at the time of enumeration, or if the occupants are only temporarily absent; that is, away on vacation or business. Other Relative — Any household member related to the householder by birth, marriage, or adoption, but not included specifically in another relationship category. Own Child —A child under 18 years old who is a son or daughter by birth, marriage (a stepchild), or adoption. For 100- percent tabulations, own children consist of all sons /daughters of householders who are under 18 years of age. For sample data, own children consist of sons /daughters of householders who are under 18 years of age aad who have never been married, therefore, numbers of own children of householders may be different in these two tabulations. Owner- Occupied Housing Unit —A housing unit is owner - occupied if the owner or co -owner lives in the unit even if it is mortgaged or not fully paid for. Race — The concept of race as used by the Census Bureau reflects self- identification by people according to the race or races with which they most closely identify. These categories are sociopolitical constructs and should not be interpreted as being scientific or anthropological in nature. Furthermore, the race categories include both racial and national - origin groups. The racial classifications used by the Census Bureau adhere to the October 30, 1997, Federal Register Notice entitled, "Revisions to the Standards for the Classification of Federal Data on Race and Ethnicity" issued by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). These standards govern the categories used to collect and present federal data on race and ethnicity. The OMB requires five minimum categories (American Indian and Alaska Native, Asian, Black or African American, Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander, and White) for race. The race categories are described below with a sixth category, "Some other race," added with OMB U.S. camua Bureau A-2 approval. In addition to the five race groups, the OMB also states that respondents should be offered the option of selecting one or more races. If an individual could not provide a race response, the race or races of the householder or other household members were assigned by the computer using specific rules of precedence of household relationship. For example, if race was missing for a natural -born child in the household, then either the race or races of the householder, another natural -born child, or the spouse of the householder were assigned. If race was not reported for anyone in the household, the race or races of a householder in a previously processed household were assigned. White — A person having origins in any of the original peoples of Europe, the Middle East, or North Africa. It includes people who indicate their race as "White" or report entries such as Irish, German, Italian, Lebanese, Near Easterner, Arab, or Polish. Black or African American — A person having origins in any of the black racial groups of Africa. It includes people who indicate their race as "Black, African Am., or Negro," or provide written entries such as African American, Afro American, Kenyan, Nigerian, or Haitian. American Indian and Alaska Native — A person having origins in any of the original peoples of North and South America (including Central America), and who maintain tribal affiliation or community attachment. It includes people who classify themselves as described below. American Indian — Includes people who indicate their race as "American Indian," entered the name of an Indian tribe, or report such entries as Canadian Indian, French - American Indian, or Spanish- American Indian. Alaska Native— Includes written responses of Eskimos, Aleuts, and Alaska Indians as well as entries such as Arctic Slope, Inupiat, Yupik, Alutiiq, Egegik, and Pribilovian. The Alaska tribes are the Alaskan Athabaskan, Tlingit, and Haida. The information for Census 2000 is derived from the American Indian Detailed Tribal Classification List for the 1990 census and was expanded to list the individual Alaska Native Villages when provided as a written response for race. Asian — A person having origins in any of the original peoples of the Far East, Southeast Asia, or the Indian subcontinent including, for example, Cambodia, China, India, Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Pakistan, the Philippine Islands, Thailand, and Vietnam. It includes "Asian Indian," "Chinese," "Filipino," "Korean," "Japanese," "Vietnamese," and "Other Asian." Asian Indian — Includes people who indicate their race as "Asian Indian" or identify themselves as Bengalese, Bharat, Dravidian, East Indian, or Goanese. Chinese — Includes people who indicate their race as "Chinese" or who identify themselves as Cantonese, or Chinese American. In some census tabulations, written entries of Taiwanese are included with Chinese while in others they are shown separately. Filipino — Includes people who indicate their race as "Filipino" or who report entries such as Philipino, Philipine, or Filipino American. Japanese — Includes people who indicate their race as "Japanese" or who report entries such as Nipponese or Japanese American. Korean — Includes people who indicate their race as "Korean" or who provide a response of Korean American. Vietnamese — Includes people who indicate their race as "Vietnamese" or who provide a response of Vietnamese American. Cambodian— Includes people who provide a response such as Cambodian or Cambodia. Hmong — Includes people who provide a response such as Hmong, Laohmong, or Mong. U.S. Ce s Bum" A -3 IIIIIIIIIiIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIuIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�IIIIII K Laotian — Includes people who provide a response such as Laotian, Laos, or Lao. Thai— Includes people who provide a response such as Thai, Thailand, or Siamese. Other Asian — Includes people who provide a response of Bangladeshi, Burmese, Indonesian, Pakistani, or Sri Lankan. Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander — A person having origins in any of the original peoples of Hawaii, Guam, Samoa, or other Pacific Islands. It includes people who indicate their race as "Native Hawaiian," "Guamanian or Chamorro," "Samoan," and "Other Pacific Islander." Native Hawaiian — Includes people who indicate their race as "Native Hawaiian" or who identify themselves as "Part Hawaiian" or "Hawaiian." Guamanian or Chamorro— Includes people who indicate their race as such, including written entries of Chamorro or Guam. Samoan — Includes people who indicate their race as "Samoan" or who identified themselves as American Samoan or Western Samoan. Other Pacific Islander— Includes people who provided a write -in response of a Pacific Islander group such as Tahitian, Northern Mariana Islander, Palauan, Fijian, or a cultural group such as Melanesian, Micronesian, or Polynesian. Some Other Race — Includes all other responses not included in the "White," 'Black or African American," "American Indian and Alaska Native, Asian," and the "Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander" race categories described above. Respondents providing write -in entries such as multiracial, mixed, interracial, or a Hispanic /Latino group (for example, Mexican, Puerto Rican, or Cuban) in the "Some other race" category are included in this category. Two or More Races — People may have chosen to provide two or more races either by checking two or more race response check boxes, by providing multiple write -in responses, or by some combination of check boxes and write -in responses. The race response categories shown on the questionnaire are collapsed into the five minimum race groups identified by the OMB, and the Census Bureau "Some other race" category. For data product purposes, "Two or more races" refers to combinations of two or more of the following race categories: • White • Black or African American • American Indian and Alaska Native • Asian • Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander • Some other race Coding of Write -In Entries — During 100 - percent processing of Census 2000 questionnaires, subject - matter specialists reviewed and coded written entries from four response categories on the race item — American Indian or Alaska Native, Other Asian, Other Pacific Islander, and Some other race - for which an area for a write -in response was provided. The Other Asian and Other Pacific Islander response categories shared the same write -in area on the questionnaire. Rental Vacancy Rate — The proportion of the rental inventory which is vacant for rent. It is computed by dividing the number of vacant units for rent by the sum of the renter - occupied units and the number of vacant units for rent, and then multiplying by 100. Renter - Occupied Housing Unit — All occupied housing units which are not owner occupied, whether they are rented for cash rent or occupied without payment of cash rent, are classified as renter occupied. Housing units in "continuing care" or life care facilities are included in the "rented for cash rent" category. U.S. cenum Bum" A-4 Seasonal, Recreational, or Occasional Use Housing Unit — Seasonal, recreational, or occasional use housing units include vacant units used or intended for use only in certain seasons, for weekends, or other occasional use throughout the year. Interval ownership units, sometimes called shared ownership or time- sharing condominiums are included in this category. (For more information, see "Vacant Housing Unit. ") Sex — Based on self - reporting of gender. Either male or female. Spouse — A person who is married to and living with the householder. This category includes people in formal marriages, as well as people in common -law marriages. Tenure — All occupied housing units are classified as either owner occupied or renter occupied. A housing . unit is owner occupied if the owner or co -owner lives in the unit even if it is mortgaged or not fully paid for. All occupied housing units which are not owner occupied, whether they are rented for cash rent or occupied without payment of cash rent, are classified as renter occupied. Vacant Housing Unit — A housing unit is vacant if no one is living in it at the time of enumeration, unless its occupants are only temporarily absent. Units temporarily occupied at the time of enumeration entirely by people who have a usual residence elsewhere are also classified as vacant. (For more information, see "Housing Unit. ") DERIVED MEASURES Average — See "Mean." Interpolation — Interpolation frequently is used in calculating medians based on interval data and in approximating standard errors from tables. Linear interpolation is used to estimate values of a function between two known values. This is the form of interpolation used to calculate median age. Mean — This measure represents an arithmetic average of a set of values. It is derived by dividing the sum (or aggregate) of a group of numerical items by the total number of items in that group. For example, average family size is obtained by dividing the number of people in families by the total number of families (or family householders). (Additional information on means and aggregates is included in the separate explanations of many of the population and housing subjects.) Median — This measure represents the middle value (if n is odd) or the average of the two middle values (if n is even) in an ordered list of n data values. The median divides the total frequency distribution into two equal parts: one -half of the cases falling below the median and one -half above the median. (See also "Interpolation. ") Percentage — This measure is calculated by taking the number of items in a group possessing a characteristic of interest and dividing by the total number of items in that group, and then multiplying by 100. Rate — This is a measure of occurrences in a given period of time divided by the possible number of occurrences during that period. Rates are sometimes presented as percentages. GEOGRAPHIC ACRONYMS ANVSA —Alaska Native village statistical area CDP — Census designated place CMSA — Consolidated metropolitan statistical area MSA — Metropolitan statistical area OTSA — Oklahoma tribal statistical area PMSA — Primary. metropolitan statistical area U.S. Census Bureau A-5 GEOGRAPHIC ACRONYMS (continued) SDAISA — State designated American Indian statistical area TDSA —Tribal designated statistical area FOR MORE INFORMATION The 100 - Percent Demographic Profile data also are available through the American FactFinder which can be accessed from the Census Bureau's Internet site at www.census.gov. To order this product, or to obtain information about the accuracy of the data, including information about the Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation, please contact Customer Services Center, Marketing Services Office, Mail Stop 1921, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC 20233. Telephone: (301) 457 -4100. FAX: (888) 249 -7295. E -mail: webmaster @census.gov. U.S. Census Bureau A -6 - . . ' -�A Where Is the Arsenic Rule ... This Month? By Karla Peterson June 22, 2000 ... proposed arsenic rule published January 16, 2001 ... final rule signed January 20, 2001 ... final rule stayed ... until March 20, 2001 March 20, 2001 ... final rule stayed again ... until May 22, 2001 April 23, 2001 ... request filed to stay again ... until February 22, 2002 January 2003 ... final rule to be published January 2006 ... final rule to be effective As its history indicates, the Arsenic Arsenic Rule is not your typical Safe Drinking Water Act rule, and there are many reasons for the delays, some of them political. Here's a few things to keep in mind with the rule: -Arsenic is not a regional issue and is found throughout the United States. -The treatment and disposal costs are significant. • Standards for waste disposal of arsenic could be lowered. -There is limited health -risk data at low -dose concentrations. So when water operators ask what they should do about the upcoming arsenic rule, I tell them to watch the news and be ready, with a plan to address the problem once the maximum contaminant level is actually final. MDH Takes Part in Pharmaceutical Study The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) has entered into a cooperative agreement with the United States Geological Survey to perform a study to determine the pres- ence and concentrations of pharmaceuticals, antibiotics, steroid hormones, and industrial contaminants in selected surface waters in Minnesota and to determine if concentrations of these chemicals are altered through drinking water processing. Sampling began last October and will continue through September of 2002. MINNESOTA DEPARTA1FNTOrHEALTH �' NF.m Am 1woRmATiCN FOR PUBLIC IVATU 1 TPUERS IN N'hNNESOTA .MDH Issues Annual Drinking Water Report The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) released its annual report on the state of drinking water in Minnesota on May 10 with a news conference at the St. Paul Regional Water Services' McCarrons Treatment Plant. Minnesota Department of Health Commissioner Jan Malcolm —along with Pat Bloomgren, director of MDH's Environmental Health division — announced the results of monitoring done in 2000. Once again, the results indicate few problems and that drinking water supplies in the state are generally in very good shape. . The report is on the world wide web at: http: / /www. health .state.mn.us /divs/elVdwp /pws/ dwpreport00.htm1 Past reports, going back to 1995, are also available on the web at: http: // www.health.state.mn.us /divs /eh/ consinfo.html#Drinking Upcoming Certification Exam Dates June 5, Red Lake Falls June 15, Brainerd September 27, St. Cloud October, Redwood Falls October 2, New Ulm October 17, Nashwauk October 23, Brooklyn Center October 26, Winona October 31, Collegeville December 6, Thief River Falls See calendar on back page for more details Summer. 2001 • Volume Nine /l Inside: Training News Great Lakes Aquarium Waterline Available Electronically Fl.�nr:rlo Mnni *nrinn Optional Interim Monthly Fluoride Monitoring for Municipalities Serving Fewer than 3,300 By David Rindal The current fluoride monitoring policy requires uniform daily sampling, testing, and reporting of fluoride consumption an, concentration. For several reasons, these daily reporting requirements are often more difficult to satisfy in communities with populations of fewer than 3,300. In an effort to ease the monthly fluoride reporting burden for such systems, the Minnesota Department of Health began implementing an interim monthly fluoride reporting policy on April 1, 2001. The interim policy is as follows: The fluoride feed container shall be observed daily. These observations may allow for detections of any fluoride overfeeds. Measurements of the amount of fluoride consumed (from the feed container) shall be conducted and recorded at least once during each calendar week. A single sample, drawn from the distribution system, shall be collected, analyzed, and recorded at least once during each calendar week. This interim reporting procedure will be an option for any community having a population under 3,300 and will be effective through December 31, 2001. At that point, the interim policy may be implemented permanently through a rule change. A slightly different version of the Fluoridation Monthly Report form is being developed to better enable the implementation of this interim policy. While it is acceptable to continue the use of existing report forms, we recommend that those systems opting to follow the interim procedure report their monthly fluoride data through the newer forms. Please remember that this interim policy is a modification of the monthly fluoride monitoring and reporting policy only. No changes are being made to the quarterly monitoring policies. Municipal water superintendents should continue to submit quarterly fluoride samples to the MDH Laboratory. Those with questions may contact their district engineers or may call meat 651/215 -0788. Minnesota AWWA Offers One -Day Seminars The Minnesota Section of American Water Works Association (AWWA) is initiating a series of one -day training seminars that will take place around the state. The first session, Well Maintenance and Design, will be held Wednesday, September 12 at the Best Western The Falls Inn in Fergus Falls. The following Wednesday, September 19, Winter Preparation Operation will be presented at the Holiday Inn Express in St. Cloud. The cost of each seminar is $50 for registrations made more than three weeks in _ advance ($60 for later registration) and includes lunch. The sessions will run from 8:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m., with registration beginning at 8:00. Participants will receive 6 credit hours for their attendance. The section plans to eventually conduct a seminar of this type in each of the six districts each year. A registration form for the September 12 and 19 seminars is on page 3. November 1 Teleconference to Focus on Distribution This fall's American Water Works Association (AWWA) Satellite Teleconference, Distribution System Repair, Replacement, and Maintenance, will be held Thursday, November 1 from 11:00 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. (with registration beginning at 10:30). The downlink locations will be the Hennepin County Technical College, 9000 Brooklyn Boulevard in Brooklyn Park, Memorial Union Hall on the campus of the University of North Dakota in Grand Forks, and Lake Superior College, 2101 Trinity Road in Duluth. Participants will receive 4 contact hours. Registration will be $65 by October 25 and $85 after October 25, or at the door. All AWWA members will receive registration information in the mail. 2 Drinking Water Institutes Set to Debut The first two Drinking Water Institutes for teachers —an initiative of the Minnesota Section AWWA Education Committee —will occur this summer. The purpose of tho institutes is to have teachers learn about drinking water ai then write curriculum on the topic to take back to then classrooms. It is hoped that, from this program, the state will eventually have an ongoing group of high - school graduates who are well - versed on drinking water by having this subject as a key part of their K -12 education at four different grade levels. The initial institutes will be aimed at middle - school teachers. The first one, to be held at the end of June in Eden Prairie, will focus on treatment. AWWA members will present the basic content while the Science Museum of Minnesota will emphasize how to teach the material in an inquiry-based method. The second institute will be in early August in Monticello. Water sources will be the main topic of th is session, which will be conducted with the participation of the American Ground Water Trust of Concord, New Hampshire. Dates Set for 2002 Schools The 2002 Metro District Water Operators School will be back at the Thunderbird Hotel in Bloomington from Wednesday, April 3 to Friday, April 5. The 2002 Northeast District Water Operators School will be at the Holiday Inn in International Falls from Wednesday, May 8 to Friday, May 10. Never be afraid to try something new. Remember, amateurs built the ark. Professionals built the Titanic. PWS Profile: Chad Kolstad Chad Kolstad is a Graduate Engineer, performing plan reviews in the Drinking Water Protection Section. He previously worked for the Minnesota Geological Survey. Originally from Maribel, Wisconsin (which is about 20 miles southeast of Green Bay), Chad now lives in St. Louis Park with his wife, Gail, whom he married last June, and cat, Marson. His parents, Lynn and Cindy Kolstad, own a plumbing business in Maribel, and Chad has a sister, Jenny, who is attending the University of Wisconsin at Whitewater. Chad enjoys fishing, hunting, canoeing, sailing, camping, water skiing, hiking, snowmobiling, and cross - country skiing. He recently went bow hunting for wild bear and has made many fishing trips to Rainy Lake, Lake of the Woods, and Chippewa Flowage. Waterline Published quarterly by the Drinking Water Protection Section Minnesota Department of Health Editor. Stew Thomley Staff: Dick Clark Noel Hansen Jeanette Boothe To request this document in another format, call 651/215 -0700, TDD 6511215 -0707 or toll -free through the Minnesota Relay Service, 118001627-3529 (ask for 6511215- 0700). Past issues of the Waterline (in PDF format)are available at: http.1Ywww. health. state. mn. us1divs1eh1prof1n/b.html Waterline: Have It Your Way Newsletter Now Available by Mail or Electronically —or Both In response to a request from some subscribers, you now have a choice on how to receive the Waterline. You can continue to receive it each quarter by mail, or you can be alerted via e-mail to the posting of the current issue of the Waterline on the Minnesota Department of Health web page, or both. (On.the web page, it will be in a PDF file, so you will need an Acrobat Reader to view it.) If you wish to get the e -mail alert, please contact Noel Hansen at: noel.hansen @health.state.mn.us Be sure to let him know if you still want to receive the Waterline by mail in addition to be alerted by e-mail. The advantage of the e-mail alert is that the Waterline will be posted in a PDF document several weeks before it will reach your post -office mailbox. Also, past issues of the Waterline, going back to the beginning of 1997, are now on the MDH web page at: http: / /www.health. state .mn.us /divs/eh/profmfo.html REGISTRATION FORM Well Maintenance and Design, September 12, 2001, Best Western The Falls Inn, Fergus Falls. Fee: $50 ($60 after August 22 or at the door). Winter Maintenance and Operation, September 19,200 1, Holiday Inn Express, St. Cloud. Fee: $50 ($60 after August 29 or at the door). Please print: Name Address City Employer Zip Day Phone Please enclose the appropriate fee. Make check payable to Minnesota AWWA. Mail this form and fee to Minnesota AWWA, 26 E. Exchange Street, St. Paul, Minnesota 55101. 3 Rules Update Disinfectant/Disinfection Byproducts Rule —Stage 1 and Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule In December of 1998, the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency published final rules for Disinfectant/Disinfectior, Byproducts and Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment. For large surface -water systems (serving a population of at least 10,000), these rules will be effective on January 1, 2002. Small surface -water systems (serving fewer than 10,000), as well as all groundwater systems using a disinfectant, will have to comply with the Disinfectant/Disinfection Byproducts Rule —Stage 1 starting January, 1, 2004. Small surface -water systems will need to comply with new surface -water treatment rules in the future, but a regulatory deadline has not been set. The Disinfectant/Disinfection Byproducts and Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment rules will tighten existing standards and require more reporting of data by water systems to the Minnesota Department of Health. Here is a summary: Disinfectant /Disinfection Byproducts Rule —Stage 1 1. Systems must monitor for chlorine or chloramine residual levels at the same locations and time as total coliforms are sampled. The monthly average of disinfectant residual levels must be reported to MDH. The running annual average for disinfectant residuals cannot exceed 4.0 parts per million. Interim Enhanced Surface Water Treatment Rule 1..If TTHM levels exceed 64 µg/1 or if HAAS levels exceed 48 gg /1, systems will have to conduct disinfection profiling daily for a 12 -month period and consult with MDH. before .changing any disinfection practices. 2. Systems must monitor for total trihalome thanes (TTHM) and 2. The combined filter effluent turbidity limit is haloacetic acids (HAAS) with the number of samples required based lowered from 0.5 to 0.3 nephelometric turbidity units. on system size and type (surface water or groundwater.) The Systems must monitor each filter continuously for maximum contaminant level for total trihalomethanes is 80 turbidity and report to MDH if the turbidity levels in micrograms per liter (µg/1) or parts per billion (ppb); for haloacetic any individual filter exceeds specified limits. Also, acids, it is 60 µg/1 or ppb. if the turbidity limits are exceeded, the system must produce a filter profile if no obvious reason for the 3. Systems must develop a plan for TTHM, HAAS, and disinfectant exceedance can be determined. Repeated residuals monitoring. The plan must include the locations where exceedances of individual filter turbidity limits ma- the samples will be collected. Surface systems serving more than require a "Comprehensive Performance Evaluatioi 3,300 population must submit the plan to MDH. All other systems be conducted for the entire treatment plant by a third - must have the plan available for review by MDH and the public. party evaluator. 4. Surface water systems must also monitor monthly for raw and 3. Significant deficiencies identified during a sanitary finished water Total Organic Carbon (TOC) and raw water survey conducted by MDH staff will need to be alkalinity. Systems will have to show that raw- or finished -water responded to by the system within 45 days of TOC levels are low or that specified percentage removals ofTOC's notification by MDH, along with a, schedule for are achieved. corrective actions. The above is just a summary of the two rules, which are very complex. If you have any questions concerning the rules, contact your district engineer, Lih -In Rezania at 651/215 -0763, or Dick Clark at 651/215-0747. Safety Spotlight: Repetitive Motion Disorders If you use the same hand or arm movement, over and over in your work, you could be at risk for developing a repetitive motion disorder (RMD). RMDs affect people in a variety of occupations. Sometimes it takes months or years before symptoms of pain, fatigue, or tingling appear in hands or arms. If left untreated, some types of RMDs can cause permanent injury. Fortunately, RMDs can often be prevented. If you experience wrist or hand pain at work, or at home after work, tell your supervisor and seek medical attention. The earlier you identify and treat a repetitive motion problem, the more likely you will be able to prevent it from becoming a serious disability. Hand exercises play an important part in preventing RMDs. Doing the two exercises shown here will strengthen wrist and hand muscles and relieve the strain of performing repetitive motions. Wrist Rotation Hand Stretch Make a fist and circle your entire hand (from Make a fist, then extend your fingers the wrist) in one direction, gently. Repeat 15 , <` as far apart as possible. Hold for about times. Switch directions and repeat 15 times. 10 seconds. Relax. Repeat the entire Then, release your fists, and with fingers sequence 5 -10 times until hands and extended, perform the same rotation. fingers feel relaxed and energized. 4 Great Lakes Aquarium Open for Business Facility Administrator Chuck Ambom explains the workings of the Aquarium's Life Support Mechanical Room to Jeanette Boothe of the Minnesota Department of Health. Sand filters are among the equipment in the Mechanical Room, hidden from the view of the more than quarter - million visitors who came to the Great Lakes Aquarium in its first year. Open less than a year, the Great Lakes Aquarium in Duluth has already hosted more than a quarter - million visitors. The major exhibits include an Isle Royale display, consisting of three separate aquariums —one that contains only native fish from 150 years ago, another that contains fish that currently inhabit Lake Superior, and a third that has lake herring, a major source of food for predatory fish from the present and from years past. There is also an exhibit of the fast - flowing Baptism River, with its brook trout, and the slower St. Louis River. Some of the facility's smaller aquariums have their own support systems, but the major exhibits are operated by a central system. Chuck Amborn, the Great Lakes Aquarium Facility Administrator, says of the major displays, "We want them to look as natural as possible. When you go to the Baptism River, you don't see a lot of pipes." That's because the pipes, along with other infrastructure components, are tucked away in the basement in the Aquarium's Life Support Mechanical Room. Hidden in this area, away from the eyes of visitors, is a multitude of equipment, including flow meters, sensors and monitoring systems, and high pressure sand filters. Freon water chillers and a heat exchanger keep the displays at the proper temperature. "We're usually cooling the water rather than heating it," says Ambom. "The ambient air temperature and the equipment operation keep the water warm enough, but it may have to be cooled for many of the displays." He adds that the coolest display is Isle Royale, where the water is 55 degrees. The Aquarium uses water from the city of Duluth, not from the bay outside the facility. Charcoal filters remove the chlorine, and they can also add sodium thiosulfate for that purpose. The most extensive equipment consists of the 10 ozone contact tanks, one for every major exhibit in the Aquarium. Generators produce the ozone, which is sent to the contact tanks and mixed with water before going to the fish tanks upstairs. In addition to disinfecting the water and ridding it of germs that could harm the fish, the ozone also removes dissolved solids to improve the clarity in the water. Outside the Life Support Mechanical Room is a water quality laboratory as well as quarantine and autopsy rooms. x 71 o MO �1 'o wart�w SNOW Ozone is generated to disinfect the water and improve its clarity. It is then pumped into a contact tank and mixed with water. Minnesota Section, American Water Works Association *June 13 -15, Central Waterworks Operators School, Cragun's, Brainerd. Contact Dick Nagy, 320/234 -5151. . September 12, Well Maintenance and Design, The Falls Inn, Fergus Falls. Contact Stew Thornley, 651/215 -0771, or Scott Franzmeier, 651/290 -6285. September 19, Winter Maintenance and Operation, Holiday Inn Express, St. Cloud. Contact Stew Thomley, 651/215- 0771, or Scott Franzmeier, 651/290 -6285. *October, Southwest Water Operators School, Redwood Falls. Contact John Blomme, 507/537 -7308. Annual Conference, October 3-5, Radisson Hotel, St. Paul. Contact Scott Franzmeier, 651/290 -6285. *October 23, Suburban Superinten- dents School, Brooklyn Center West Fire Department. Contact Mark Hartfiel, 763/585 -7103. *October 26, Southeast Water Operators School, Winona. Contact Paul Halvorson, 507/285 -7289. *October 31, Central Water Operators School, St. John's University, Collegeville. Contact Dick Nagy, 320/234 - 4222. *December 4 -6, Northwest Water Operators School, Best Western, Thief River Falls. Contact Stew Thomley, 651 / 215 -0771. Water Operator Training Minnesota Rural Water Association Contact Kyle Kedrowski, 1/800/367 -6792. *June 5, Control Systems, SCADA, and Pumps, Red Lake Falls. June 20, Operation & Maintenance, Blooming Prairie. August 7, Well Drilling, Monticello. October 1, Operation & Maintenance, Lonsdale. *September 26 -27, Exam Prep, St. Cloud. *October 2, .Operation & Maintenance, New Ulm. October 3, Operation & Maintenance, Princeton. October 4, Operation & Maintenance, Maple Grove. *October 17, Operation & Mainte- nance, Nashwauk. October 24, Securing Financing for Small Systems, Detroit Lakes. October 25, Securing Financing for Small Systems, St. Cloud. December 4, Winterizing Your Water System, Rochester. December 5; Winterizing Your Water System, St. Cloud. AWWA Teleconference November 1, Distribution System Repair, Replacement, and Mainte- nance, Brooklyn Park, Duluth, and Grand Forks. Contact Stew Thomley, 651/215 -0771. Wastewater Training Minnesota Rural Water Association Contact Pete McPherson, 1/800/367 -6792. June 28, Wastewater Training, Frazee. August 2, Trenchless Technologies, Watertown. August 7, Pump Training Session, Hoyt Lakes. September 11, Wastewater Training, East Grand Forks. September 27, Wastewater Training, New London. October 2, Wastewater Trainin€ Walker. December 4, Wastewater Training, Elbow Lake. *Schools /meetings marked with an asterisk include a water certification exam. To be eligible to take a certification exam, applicants must have hands -on operations experience at a drinking water system. For an up -to -date list of events, check the MDH web site at: http: / /www.health.state.mn. us/ divs/ eh/ dwp /pws /dwopcerVwat_op_sched.html W WATE M PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY UNrr Minnesota Department of Health . 121 E. 7th Place Suite 220 P. O. Box 64975 St. Paul, Minnesota 55164 -0975 ADDRESS SERVICE REQUESTED BulkRate PA® R=WtNal71 sL>aW June 13, 2001 Dennis Maetzold — Mayor of Edina Edina City Hall 4801 West 50'h Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 Dear Dennis: I read with interest in the Edina Sun of 6/13/01, the Council approval of the sound wall on the Highway 169 frontage road. The article described a limited length of structure. What are your plans for continuation of the wall South past all of the other affected neighborhoods? We have been waiting patiently for a sound and view barrier since we built our home on Apache Road in 1988. It would seem that this would be the most opportune time to complete the project in an expeditious and consistent manner while at the same time treating neighboring residences in a fair and equitable fashion. Please let us all know what it will take to finish the project in a timely manner. Si erely Q�� c e J. Bock 6727 Apache Road Edina, MN 55439 Cc: Francis Hoffman — Director of Public Works Lila B. Larson 4800 School Road Edina, Minnesota 55424 May 18, 2001 Dear Mayor Maetzold, I do thank you for the kind words and the honor of being selected as Senior of 2001. To say I was surprised is an understatement. This is simply who I am, no award is necessary for being oneself. I must return the compliment for your efforts in behalf of the City of Edina. Having been involved through much of the recent work I'm aware of the scope and breadth of your involvement. We once again have erred in our conservative bent. Please express my thanks to the others who worked so hard to right the oversights of the past decades. I take comfort knowing that our city is in such capable hands. I hesitate to try to name them as there are so many, but start with Gordon Hughes and John Kiprios. Sincerely,