The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1999-02-21_COUNCIL PACKETf _P_ AGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL DECEMBER 21,1999 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Commissioner, Council Member or citizen so requests it. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the Agenda. * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA - Regular Meeting of December 7,1999 II. LETTER OF INTENT - Kunz /Lewis Redevelopment III. AWARD OF BID -Centennial Lakes South Park -Phase 3, Improvement R -18 Rollcall IV. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS- as per pre -list dated 12/15/99, TOTAL: $78,129.25 V. ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Minutes of December 7, 1999 and special meeting of December 6,1999 II. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS - Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Planner Public Comment heard. Motion to close hearing. Zoning Ordinances: First and Second Reading require 4/5 favorable rollcall of all members of Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall of all members of Council to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. Conditional Use Permit: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. Rollcall A. PRELIMINARY REZONING AND AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP Haugland Company, Tracts A And B, Registered Land Survey No. 1378 Hennepin County, Minnesota. llcall B. FINAL PLAT - JMS Addition to Edina Rollcall Rollcall Agenda /Edina City Council December 21, 1999 Page 2 III. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS A. Traffic Safety Report of December 7, 1999 B. Appeal of License Suspension, Donatelle & Associates, Rossini's Restaurant C. Change Regular Council Meeting Scheduled March 7, 2000, (State Caucus Night) to Monday, March 6, 2000 D. Resolution Authorizing John Wallin, Finance Director, To Sell, Assign And Endorse For Transfer, Certificates Representing Stocks, Bonds Or Other Securities Now Registered Or Hereafter Registered In The Name Of The City Of Edina E. Tentative Dates for Annual Meeting and Volunteer Recognition Dinner F. Change Order, Great Western Corporation, Contract 99 -1 (Eng) Cheyenne Circle Lift Station G. Water Quality Video Report H Year 2000 Consultant Contract I -494 Corridor Commission IV. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS V. CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS VI. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES VII. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL VIII. MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEM IX. FINANCE A. PUBLIC HEARING - 2000 Levy and Budget Adoption B. ORDINANCE NO. 1999 -14 Amending Code Section 185 Increasing Certain Fees Rollcall C. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS As Per Pre -List Dated 12/15/99 Total: $808,701.47 SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS Fri Dec 24 CHRISTMAS DAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed Tues Dec 28 Year End Meeting 5:00 P.M. MANAGERS CONFERENCE RM Fri Dec 31 NEW YEARS DAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed Tues Jan 4 Work Session With Park Board 6:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Jan 4 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mon Jan 17 MARTIN LUTHER KING DAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed Tues Jan 18 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL Cl IAM13ER Tues Feb 1 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL Cl IAM131:Rti Tues Feb 15 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL. CRAM 131 RS Mon Feb 21 PRESIDENTS DAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN City of Edina BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that the Comprehensive Plan of the City be amended by changing the designation for the property located at Tracts A and B, Registered Land Survey . No. 1378, Hennepin County, Minnesota on the 1980 City Land Use Map from single family to commercial. Aff 11'ri A9 14 City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA )SS CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do. hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by she Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 21, 1999, and as recorded: in: the - Minutes of said Regular Meeting. 1 WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this December -22, 1999. ff V City Hall (612) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 826 -0379 RESOLUTION GRANTING FINAL PLAT APPROVAL City of Edina. FOR JMS ADDITION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled, "JMS ADDITION ", platted by John K. Rikkers and Mary Ellen Rikkers, husband and wife, ,and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council be and is hereby granted final plat approval. Passed and adopted this 21" day of December, 1999. STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA )SS CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 21, 1999, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this December 29, 1999. s _ Acting City Clerk City Hall (612) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 826 -0379 RESOLUTION City of Edina BE IT RESOLVED THAT John Wallin, Finance Director of the City of Edina is hereby authorized to sell, assign and endorse for transfer, certificates representing stocks bonds, or other, securities now registered or hereafter registered in the name of this municipal government. Adopted this 21St day of December, 1999. Attest: &Lco�' Debra A. Mangen, 6ty derk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) Dennis F. Maetzold, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of December 21, 1999, and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this 22nd day of December, 1999. Debra A. Mangen, Ci Clerk City Hall (612) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 826 -0379 MINUTES OF THE JOINT MEETING OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL DECEMBER 7, 1999 - 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners. Faust, Hovland, Kelly, and Chair Maetzold. Commissioner Johnson entered the meeting at 7:07 P.M. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Kelly and seconded by Commissioner Faust approving the Housing and Redevelopment Authority Agenda as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland Kelly, Maetzold Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FOR November 16, 1999, APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Kelly and seconded by Commissioner Faust approving the Minutes of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority for November 16, 1999. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. JOINT HRA/CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING HELD RESOLUTIONS ADOPTED AMENDING GRANDVIEW AREA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Director /Manager Hughes stated the proposed amendments to the Grandview Area Redevelopment Plan and the Grandview Tax Increment Financing Plan are necessary to facilitate the redevelopment of properties located south of Eden Avenue. The amendments would also provide the necessary authority for the HRA to pursue the acquisition of privately held properties which may be included in the redevelopment proposed by Opus Construction and Ron Clark Construction. The amendment to the Redevelopment Project consists of (i) the acquisition and redevelopment by the HRA or another party of all or a portion of the Redevelopment Property. not previously acquired by the HRA, (ii) the construction by the HRA, the City or another party on the Redevelopment Property of a public library and senior center and (iii) other public redevelopment costs incurred in connection with the redevelopment of the Redevelopment Property. The estimated proposed additional expenses of tax increment related to the acquisition and redevelopment are as follows: Acquisition of Property $3,100,000 Construction of library 2,860,000 Construction of senior center 2,145,000 Parking & Site Development 3,940,000 Demolition 500,000 Financing Costs 175,000 Off -site Improvements 500,000 Administration 500,000 Sub -total $13,720,000 Contingency 10% 1,372,000 TOTAL $15,092,000 Mr. Hughes added that as prescribed by State Law; a copy of the proposed Amendments to the Redevelopment Plan and Tax Increment Finance Plan were provided to Hennepin County and Independent School District 273. He noted receipt of a response from Hennepin County via a memorandum written by Sandra L. Vargas, County. Administrator to the Board of Commissioners. The Hennepin County response supports the proposed amendment. Mr. Hughes stated that no response had been received from School District 273. Commissioner /Member Kelly asked if the Wanner property had been included in the Grandview Area Redevelopment Area. Mr. Hughes using a map to show the property on the eastern side of the proposed redevelopment area, pointed. out the Wanner property and said it was included in the proposed redevelopment area. Commissioner /Member Kelly stated he remained concerned regarding construction of a new library. He wants to make sure the City does not give greater value than it receives in return. This does not necessarily need to be actual dollars, but it should. be something of value. Mayor Maetzold noted a possibility exists that. meeting or auditorium space may be constructed that the City could use for public meetings. Member Johnson added he believed staff understands the Council's concern and should be allowed to negotiate the best possible deal. Commissioner /Member Faust asked if the proposed amendment is what is necessary to, meet the December 31, 1999, deadline with the State of Minnesota. Mr. Hughes explained the amendment must be approved in order for the redevelopment to take place. However, the City must have a Letter of Intent with their developer by December 31, 1999, in order to use the tax increment fund in this district as proposed. Commissioner /Member Faust said she had been contacted by Vernon Terrace with a request for a presentation of the proposed redevelopment. She asked about the timing of such a presentation and if the developer should be requested to make the presentation. Mr. Hughes replied he believed that the developer should make the presentation and that Tom Lund could be contacted immediately and requested to schedule a time with the residents of Vernon Terrace. Commissioner /Member Faust expressed her hope that the architecture of the redevelopment be different than. Vernon Terrace. She asked if the redevelopment would follow.the normal.planning process per Edina's Code. Mr. Hughes assured her 2 '4 the redevelopment would follow the same planning process as a totally private development. He added he believed it was too early in the process to know in any detail the proposed architecture of the redevelopment. Commissioner /Member Hovland commented that the Council's desire for the redevelopment was to see architecture significant for the space involved. He suggested that as the design is developed that design standards could be legally set forth if deemed necessary. Continuing, Commissioner /Member Hovland stated that perhaps actually taking legal action would be premature. Commissioner /Member Faust advised that in her experience, standards need be in place before. a project begins. Mr. Hughes reminded the Council that the City owns half of the property involved in the proposed redevelopment; and therefore the City is in a very strong position to suggest design priorities. Mr. Hughes recommended that the Council not develop any design standards at this time. Commissioner /Member Johnson voiced concern over the .financing for the construction and operation of the Senior Center. Commissioner /Member Kelly agreed and suggested a very specific use agreement be delineated. Mayor Maetzold reminded that the Senior Center would be a' City building. Mr. Hughes reiterated the Senior Center would be a City facility managed by the City. Commissioner /Member Johnson asked if the Senior Center would be self - supporting. Mr. Hughes responded that the City currently operates the existing Senior Citizen Center located in the Community Center and it is not self- supporting. He said the operation of the new Senior Center may be reviewed and a decision made regarding whether or not the seniors should take greater responsibility in its operation. Commissioner /Member Hovland commented that he saw the entire project as somewhat fluid, meaning that many changes may transpire over time regarding the size and design of. the components. He added that he recalled the construction of a new library was recommended by staff as the best alternative to solve some facility expansion issues for the City. Chair /Mayor Maetzold called for public comment. No one spoke. Chair /Mayor Maetzold made a motion seconded by Member Johnson to close the public hearing. Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold. Motion carried. Commissioner /Member Hovland introduced the following resolution and made a motion for its approval: RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO GRANDVIEW REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1, GRANDVIEW AREA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND GRANDVIEW TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN AND 3 MAKING FINDINGS WITH RESPECT THERETO BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota as follows: 1. The Commissioners of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "HRA ") and the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "City "), have previously approved the Grandview Area Redevelopment Plan (the "Redevelopment Plan ") and Grandview Redevelopment Project No. 1 (the "Redevelopment Project ") to be undertaken pursuant thereto, and in order to finance the public redevelopment costs to be incurred by the City and the HRA in connection with the Redevelopment Plan and Redevelopment Project, the HRA and the City have approved Grandview Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "Financing Plan "), which establishes a tax increment financing district which is designated by the HRA as the Grandview Tax Increment Financing District (Hennepin County No. 1202) (the "District "). On April 7, 1997, the HRA and City approved an amendment to the Redevelopment Plan, Redevelopment Project and Financing Plan (the "1997 Amendment "). The HRA has approved an amendment to the Redevelopment Project, the Redevelopment Plan and the Tax Increment Financing Plan, as amended by the 1997 Amendment, which is entitled "Amendments to Grandview Redevelopment Project No. 1, Grandview Area Redevelopment Plan and Grandview Tax Increment Financing Plan" (the "1999 Amendment "). The 1999 Amendment authorizes the acquisition and redevelopment by the HRA of the property in the area subject to the Redevelopment Plan and the additional expenditures of tax increment revenues derived from the District to pay public redevelopment costs of the acquisition and redevelopment of such property by the HRA or another party, including costs of a public library and senior center, and to�pay administrative expenses of the HRA and City. 2. This Council on December 7, 1999, held a public hearing on the 1999 Amendment after notice of the public hearing was published in the official newspaper of the City not less than ten (10) days prior to the date of the hearing. At such public hearing all persons desiring to be heard with respect to the 1999 Amendment were given an opportunity to express their views with respect thereto. 3. This Council has previously found that the District is a redevelopment district within the scope of Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subdivision 10 and the Amendment will not change such prior findings. The 1999 Amendment further serves the original goals and objectives of the City and HRA in approving the Redevelopment Plan, the Redevelopment Project and the Financing Plan and the 1997 Amendment, by redeveloping property in the City in order to prevent or reduce blight, blighting factors and the causes of blight, and by providing needed public facilities. 4. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, subdivision 4, it is hereby found that: (A) The District, is a- redevelopment district, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subdivision 10, for the reasons set forth in previous 4 findings by this Council, and the 1999 Amendment does not alter these previous findings. (B) The proposed development to be undertaken in accordance, with the Redevelopment Plan, as amended by the 1999 Amendment, in the opinion of this Council would not occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and therefor the use of tax increment financing is deemed necessary. (C) The Financing Plan, as amended by the 1999 Amendment, conforms to the general plan for the development of the City as a whole. (D) The Financing Plan, as amended by the 1999 Amendment, will afford maximum opportunity consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole for the development of the area subject to Redevelopment Plan by private enterprise. (E) The City confirms its election of the method of tax increment computation set forth in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, subdivision 3, clause (a) with respect to the District. Passed by the Council this 7th day of December, 1999. Attest: Debra A. Mangen Dennis F. Maetzold Adopted this 7th day of December, 1999. Commissioner /Member Kelly seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold Motion carried. CLAIMS PAID Motion made by Commissioner Hovland approving the Check Register dated December 2, 1999, and consisting of one page totaling $31,576.88. Commissioner Kelly seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold Motion carried. There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, Chair Maetzold declared the meeting adjourned at 7:10 P.M. 5 Executive Director O N 4 tNA, REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item HRA IL From: GORDON L. HUGHES Consent ❑ CITY MANAGER Information Only ❑ Date: DECEMBER 219 1999 Mgr. Recommends ® To HRA ❑ To Council Subject: AUTHORIZE EXECUTION OF Subject: ® Motion THE LETTER OF INTENT El Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion 0 REPORT: Staff has concluded negotiations with Opus Norwest LLC, and REC, Inc. with respect to the Letter of Intent for the Eden Avenue redevelopment project. A copy of this Letter of Intent is attached. This Letter of Intent reflects our understandings concerning the development of the ,Eden Avenue properties. This Letter of Intent is not binding in nature but will serve as the foundation for redevelopment agreements which will be entered into this winter. In addition, we have prepared the attached agreement between the City and the HRA which serves to solidify the obligation required by December 31, 1999. In our opinion, the HRA's interests are _ met by this Letter of Intent. We would recommend approval. 0 0 r Z 12/17/99 FRI 16:38 FAX 6123402644 DORSEY & WHITNEY December ,1999. Opus Northwest, L.L.C. Opus Corporate Center 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343 R.E.C. Inc. 7500 West 78h Street Edina, MN 55439. Hennepin County Library Attn: David R. Cramer Senior Administrative Manager 13505 industrial Park Boulevard Plymouth, MN 55441 Re: Letter of Intent For Eden Avenue Redevelopment in Edina Ladies and Gentlemen: The purpose of this correspondence is to set forth certain non- binding understandings between the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority CTIRA') and you with respect to and concerning the Eden Avenue Redevelopment Project (the "Project") and the Grandview Tax Increment Financing District (the "District'). The following paragraphs reflect our understanding of the matters described in them, but do not constitute a complete statement of, or a legally binding or enforceable agreement or commitment of. either the HRA or you with respect to, the matters described therein: I. The Project as proposed will consist of approximately 190 residential units, approximately 80,000 square feet of rentable office space (the "Office Building'), an approximately 20,000 square. foot library (the "Library'), an approximately. 15,000 square foot senior center (the "Senior Center ") and various site related improvements such as public and private streets and driveways, parking, drainage, utilities and Z002 12/17/99 FRI 16:38 FAX 6123402644 DORSEY & WHITNEY 16003 14 Opus Northwest L.L.C. R.E.C. Inc. Hennepin County Library December—, 1999 Page 2 landscaping. The Project will integrate Sherwood Park and all or a portion of Sherwood Park may be improved to serve both the Project and the Edina community. A depiction of the Project is attached to this correspondence as Attachment. A. 2. The Project area as depicted on Attachment A (collectively the "Redevelopment Property ") consists of (a) property currently owned by the IEM and commonly referred to as the Kunz Oil property and the Lewis Engineering property (collectively the "HRA Land'J, (b) the TAGS building at 5201 Eden Circle, (c) the building located at 5244 Eden Circle, (d) the Edina Pet Hospital building located. at 5237 Eden Avenue, (e) the Classic I•lair Design building located at 5241 Eden Avenue.and (f) Sherwood Park currently located on the southwest portion of the Redevelopment Property. 3. Opus Northwest, L.L.C. C' Opus') and R.E.C. Inc. doing business as Ron C''ark Construction ( "Clark ") will form Grandview Square, L.L.C. ( "Grandview";.. 4. Grandview will be responsible for developing the residential and office elements of the Project. 5: The HRA will construct the Library in accordance with drawings and speci *_'ications mutually agreed upon by the HRA and the Hennepin County Library Board (the "Library Board "), and exchange it for the current Edina Library property located at 4701 West 50`s Street. The Senior Center will be constructed by the HRA as required by the City of Edina (the "City). The Senior Center will be designed to share certain facilities with the Library. The architectural design and appearance of the exterior of the Library and Senior Center is subject to the mutual approval of the Library Board, Grandview, the HRA and the City. The City, the HRA, and the Library Board will each enter into a reciprocal operating and easement agreement (the "ROEA ") to provide the necessary easements and party wall agreements to permit construction of the Library and Senior Center and to coordinate and facilitate vehicular and pedestrian ingress and egress to the Library and Senior Center and the joint use, maintenance and repair of all common areas, utilities and parking lots serving the. Library and Senior Center. The IEKA will continence construction of the Library and Senior Center as soon as reasonably possible after (a) the area upon which the Library and Senior Center, together with the adjacent parking, driveway and landscaping areas, are located.as depicted on Attachment A (the "Library/Senior Center Site ") is acquired by the HRA, (b) the drawings and specifications for the Library have been mutually approved by the HRA and the Library Board, (c) the drawings and specifications for the Senior Center have been mutually approved by the HRA and the City and (d) the City, HRA and Library Board have each executed the ROEA and the HRA will 12/17/99 FRI 16:39 F.+l 6123402644 DORSEY & WHITNEY Opus Northwest L.L.C. R.E.C. Inc. Hennepin County Library December , 1999 Page 3 thereafter complete the construction of the Library and Senior Center as expeditiously as reasonably possible. 6. The FIRA will use reasonable efforts to construct on the Eden Avenue right -of -way (preferably on, the bus garage side of Eden Avenue) a visual buffer between the Redevelopment Property and the bus garage. 7.. The following terms will be included in the redevelopment agreement with respect to the Project (the "Redevelopment Agreement's (it being understood that additional terms and conditions will be included in the Redevelopment Agreement for the Project): (a) Grandview will undertake all negotiations with property owners with respect to the assembly of the Redevelopment Property other than the HRA Land and Sherwood Park. (b) Grandview will pay all costs of acquisition and relocation including all costs associated with condemnation, and all costs of platting and zoning, all costs of environinental and geotechnical reports, tests, investigations and surveys, all costs of land surveys and all taxes and fees. (c) Opus and Clark will jointly and severally guarantee payment to the H.ZA of all costs of acquisition and relocation, including all costs associated with condemnation, and the $3.7 million equity contribution provided for in ' Paragraph 7(g). (d) To the extent any portion of the Library/Senior Center Site is acquired by Grandview pursuant to Paragraph 7(a).above, then Grandview will convey such portion of the Library/Senior Center Site to the HRA at no cost to the. HRA. This subparagraph (d) shall not in any way modify or limit Grandview's obligations under Paragraph 7(b) above or the obligations of Opus and Clark under Paragraph 7(c) above. It is the intention and understanding that the Library/Senior Center Site will be acquired by the HRA either from Grandview or by condemnation at no cost to the HRA. (e) Grandview will pay all costs associated with demolition, site improvements, including but not limited to public streets, curbs, gutters, all utilities, sanitary and storm sewers and modifications and improvements to Sherwood Park, and all on -site work with the exception of the Library and Senior Center and all parking, landscaping and other site improvements on the Library/Senior Center Site. 16004 12/17/99 FRI 16:39 FAX 6123402644 DORSEY & WHITNEY Opus Northwest L.L.C. R.E.C. Inc. Hennepin County Library December _, 1999 Page 4 (f) Grandview will enter into minimum assessment agreements with the HRA with respect to all taxable improvements in the Development. The minimum assessed value contained in the assessment agreements will be a reasonable estimate of taxable valuation as determined by the City Assessor and the assessment agreements pertaining to the each residential unit will terminate upon the initial sale of such unit if requested by Grandview. (g) Grandview will pay the HRA $3.7 million as its equity contribution to the Project no later than November 30, 2001. In consideration of the obligation to make such $3.7 million equity contribution, the HRA will convey. the.HRA Land to .Grandview at no cost to Grandview. The obligation to contri-)ute said $3.7 million will be secured by such collateral, credit enhancements, guarantees, and /or other security, acceptable to the HRA. A portion of this $3.7 million equity contribution will be applied promptly upon its receipt to pay in full the debt, the maturity date of which has been defcrrcd until February 1, 2003 as provided in Paragraph 7(m) below, by calling the bonds evidencing such debt. In addition to the $3.7 million equity contribution described above, Grandview will pay the HRA $175,000 upon the execution of the Redevelopment Agreement as consideration for the actions taken by the HRA as described below in Paragraph 7(m). (h) When requested by Grandview, HRA will adopt condemnation resolutions with respect to the acquisition of the Redevelopment Property other than the HRA Land and Sherwood Park following the execution of an agreement by Opus and Clark td jointly and severally agree to pay and indemnify, defend and hold harmless the HRA and the City from and against all costs, expenses, awards, damages and claims arising out of or related to the adoption of such condemnation resolutions and the condemnations. authorized by such resolutions, including but not limited to all relocation costs, title examination and title commitment fees and charges, the cost of appraisals, legal fees, the costs of environmental and geotechnical reports, tests, investigations and surveys' and the costs of land surveys. (i) HRA will proceed with condemnation actions if requested by Grandview, including "quick take" proceedings pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 117.042. (j) Upon completion of the Library, the 14RA will convey the current library property at 4701 West 50th Street to the City for $1,000,000, which shall be treated as revenue for the District. Z 005 12/17/99 FRI 16:40 FAX 6123402644 DORSEY & WHITNEY Q006 Opus Northwest L.L.C. R.E.C: Inc. Hennepin County Library December—, 1999 Page 5 (k) HRA and City will issue General Obligation Bonds to finance in part the construction of the Library, Senior Center, together with all parking, landscaping and other site improvements . on the Library/Senior Center Site, and necessary public improvements off the Redevelopment Property and will proceed to construct such facilities in connection with the Project; provided, however, that the costs of such HRA and City improvements described above that are senior and prior to the Note shall not exceed $6,005,000. (1) HRA will issue a pay as you go note (the "Note'l to Grandview in a maximum principal amount of $7,716,000. Subject to the adjustments hereinafter provided for in this Paragraph 7(1), the principal amount of the Note will be solely comprised of Grandview's actual out -of- pocket costs for the following: (i) improvements to Sherwood Park, parking for the Office Building, site development, and demolition of existing improvements on the Redevelopment Property; and (ii) acquisition and relocation, including costs associated with condemnation, with respect to the assembly of the Redevelopment Property, other than the HRA Land, paid to unrelated parties by Grandview. The aggregate principal amount of the Note attributable to costs described in subparagraph (i) above of this Paragraph 7(1) shall not exceed $3,811,000; provided, however, that if t6 costs described in subparagraph (ii) above of this Paragraph 7(l) are less than $3,900,000 but more than $3,700,000, said amount of $3,811,000 shall be increased by the difference between $3,900,000 and the actual costs described in subparagraph (ii) of this Paragraph 7(1); provided further, however, if the costs .described in subparagraph (ii) above of this Paragraph 7(l) are less than $3,700,000, said amount of $3,811,000 shall be increased to $4,011,000 and the maximum principal amount of the Note shall be reduced by the amount by which the actual costs described in subparagraph (ii) above of this Nragraph 7(1) arc less than $3,700,000. If the aggregate of the principal amount of the Note attributable to costs described in subparagraph (ii) above of this Paragraph 7(1) exceeds $3,900,000, the maximum principal amount of the Note will be increased by the lesser of (i) the amount of such excess or (ii) $700,000. The Note will be issued immediately prior to or simultaneously with the payment by Grandview of costs to be reimbursed'to Grandview pursuant to and in accordance with the terms of the Redevelopment Agreement and the Note. (m) The HRA will continue to amortize the 1992 debt which is payable from tax increment received from the District over the remaining term of such debt and 12/17/99 FRI 16:40 FAX 6123402644 DORSEY & WHITNEY Opus Northwest L.L.C. R.E.C. Inc. Hennepin County Library December_, 1999 Page 6 will cause the maturity date of the 1997 debt which is payable from tax increment received from the District to be deferred until February 1, 2003. (n) . Opus will provide design services for, and will act as construction manager for the construction of, both the Library and the Senior Center pursuant. to agreements between the HRA and/or City and Opus. Opus will publicly bid all trade.contracts in accordance with State law and City policies which bids will be approved by the HRA. 8. The Note will: (a) Be annually junior and subordinate (i) to all existing debt previously incurred which is payable from tax increment received from the District, (ii) subject to Paragraph 7(k), to all new debt issued by the City or HRA with respect to public improvements associated with the Project, and (iii) to the payment of the administrative costs of the City and HRA related to the District (collectively the "City and HRA Debt and Administrative Costs'J. Such administrative costs, other than staff/legal/consulting and other administrative costs included in the Project budget, will not exceed in any year two percent (2 %) of District tax increment collections for that year. (b) Bear interest at 9 percent per annum on the outstanding principal amount. (c) Provide .that the outstanding principal amount of the Note will be increased up to the maximum principal amount of the Note as costs to be reimbursed are paid by Grandview. (d) Be a limited revenue note and only payable from tax increment received from the Project until (i) all of the Redevelopment Property has been acquired either by Grandview pursuant to Paragraph 7(a) above or by the PIRA pursuant to Paragraph 7(i) above and Grandview and/or Opus and Clark have paid and performed their obligations under Paragraph 7(b) and 7(c) above and ;ii) ,Grandview has completed the Office Building and at least 40 residential units (the "Phase I Private Improvements'), except that the Note shall be payable from the entire tax increment received from the District for taxes payable in 2000. Upon the acquisition of all of the Redevelopment Property and the payment and performance of Grandview's, Opus' and Clark's obligations as described above in subparagraph (i) of this Paragraph 8(d) and the completion of Phase I Private Improvements, the Note will also be payable on a subordinated basis from tax increment received for existing improvements in the District. Ca 007 12/17/99 FRI 16:41 FAX 6123402644 DORSEY & WHITNEY Opus Northwest L.L.C. R.E.C. Inc. Hennepin County Library December 1999 Page 7 The Note will not be payable from tax increment received for future improvements in the District, which are not part of the Project. (e) If requested by Grandview, be issued as two separate notes to Grandview, or one each to Opus and Clark, in such denominations as shall be directed by Grandview, not to exceed the total principal amount of the HRA obligation to Grandview. The Note will not be assignable or transferable without the prior written consent of the 'HRA. Such consent shall not be unreasonably withheld if (i) the assignee or transferee delivers to the HRA a written instrument acknowledging the limited nature of the HRA's payment obligations under the Note, and (ii) the assignee or transferee executes and delivers to the HRA a certificate, in form and substance satisfactory to the HRA. 9. Proceeding with the Project will be contingent upon the following, which contingencies (other than Paragraph 9[b]) shall be for the mutual benefit of Grandview and the HRA: (a) A final determination by Grandview and the HRA that the tax increment revenue from the District will be sufficient to pay the City and Ffl A Debt and Administrative Costs and the Note. (b) There shall have been no new, adverse changes in Minnesota law that would prohibit the HRA from using tax increment revenue from the District to pay the City and HRA Debt and Administrative Costa. (c) The HRA and Grandview shall have agreed that environmental assessment worksheet is not required unless petitioned for pursuant to Minnesota law and that all other environmental and geotechnical reports, tests, investigations and surveys deemed necessary for all of the Redevelopment Property and the current Edina Library site at 4701 West 50`s Street, including Phase I and. Phase 11 environmental studies, are satisfactory. (d) The City, HRA, and Grandview shall have obtained all necessary approvals for the Project from the Nine Mile Watershed District and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. (e) The ERA shall have entered into definitive, binding agreements for the acquisition, development, construction and operation of the Project as. described above with each of the City, the Library, and Grandview. Coos 12/17/99 FRI 16:41 FAX 6123402644 DORSEY & WHITNEY. Opus Northwest L.L.C. R.E.C. ine. Hennepin County Library December 1,999 Page 8 (f) The City granting all rezoning and development plan approvals necessary to allow the Project to move forward. 10. Proceeding with each phase of the Project will be contingent upon the City granting all subdivisions or platting approvals, site development plans and conditional use permits with respect to those portions of the Redevelopment Property at any time and from time to time owned by Grandview or the :l;3RA necessary to allow the applicable phase of the Project to move forward: This correspondence is not intended to create a binding agreement between the -HRA and you, and no such agreement is or shall be created until a written contract for the acquisition and development of the Redevelopment Property is executed by and between the HRA and you. It is the intention of the HRA and each of you, however, to execute the Redevelopment Agreement on or before March 21, 2000. If you are prepared to participate in the Project in accordance with the general terms. outlined above (subject to the above - referenced contingencies), please so acknowledge by executing the enclosed copy of this correspondence and returning it to me no later than the close of business on December 1999. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED TO: i OPUS NORTHWEST L.L.C. By Its HENNEPIN COUNTY LIBRARY By Its Attachment Sincerely, Gordon Hughes, Executive Director Dated: December_, 1999 R.E.C. INC. By Its 1Z 009 L11-- rT �tyhry i PC- tJtVr11- e � t. Grandview Square Development Edina, MN 11/22/99 ' v North P OPUS,, Ron Clark Construction } Opus Architects and Engineers, Inc m Concept Site Plan 12/17/99 FRI 11:40 FAX 6123402644 r, DORSEY & WHITNEY SENIOR CENTER AND PUBLIC LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA AND CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA December 1, 1999 2002 DORSEY & WHITNEY SENIOR CENTER AND PUBLIC LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA AND CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA December 1, 1999 2002 12/17/99 FRI 11:40 FAX 6123402644 DORSEY & WHITNEY 1� 003 TABLE OF CONTENTS Paec Section 1.1 Definitions ............... ............................... 3 Section 2.1 By 1-IRA ..................................................... 4 Section 2.2 By City ......... ........................... ............. 4 Section 3.1 Construction of Library and Senior Center ..................... ... 4 Scction 3.2 Purchase of Existing Library ....... , .......................... 5 Section 4.1 HRA and City Representatives Not Tndividually Liable .............................................. 5 Section 4.2. Titles of Articles and Sections ............................... 5 Scction 4.3 Notices and Demands ..................... . .............. :.. 5 Scction 4.4 Counterparts ................. .................................. 6 .i. 12/17/99 FRI 11:40 FAX 6123402644 DORSEY & WHITNEY SENIOR CENTER AND PUBLIC LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT This Agreement is made as of December 1, 1999, by and between the EKOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, a public body '.Corporate and politic (the "HRA ") and the CITY OF EDiNA, MINNESOTA, a municipal corporation of the State of Minnesota (the "City "). WITNESSE-TH: WHEREAS, the HRA was created pursuant to state law now codified as Minnesota. Statutes, Sections 469.001 through 469.047 (the "Act ") and was authorized to transact business and exercise its powers by a resolution of the City Council of the City; and WHEREAS, in furtherance of the objectives of the Act, the HRA has undertaken a program for the clearance and redevelopment of blighted, vacant and unused areas of' the City and in this connection is engaged in carrying out a redevelopment project as def ned W Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.002, Subdivision 12, known as Grandview Area Redevelopment Project No. 1 (the "Redevelopment Project"); and WHEREAS, there has been prepared and approved by the HRA and the City Council pursuant to the Act a redevelopment plan for the Redevelopment Project entitled the Grandview Area Redevelopment Plan (the "Redevelopment Plan "); and W.H'EREAS, to finance the public redevelopment costs to be incurred 4- the City and the HRA in connection with the Redevelopment Plan and Redevelopment Project; the UIRA and the City Council have approved Grandview Area Tax Increment Financing Plan (the . "Financing Plan ") which establishes a tax increment financing district which is designated by the HRA as the Grandview Tax Tncrement l=i.nancing District (Hennepin County No. 1202) (the "fax increment District'); and: WHEREAS, in furtherance of the goals and objectives contained in the: Redevelopment Project and Redevelopment Plan, the .-.IRA desires to undertake a project to redevelop a portion of the property subject to the Redevelopment Plan consisting of properties presently described as Kunz Oil, Lewis Engineering, the TAGS Building located at 5201 Eden Circle, the building located at 5244 Eden Circle, the Edina Pet Hospital building located at 5237 Eden Avenue and the Classic Hair Design building located at 5241 Eden Avenue (the "Subject Land "); and WHEREAS, in order to provide needed public facilities for the residents of the City, the HRA and City desire to include in the project to be constructed on the Subject Land, a public library and a senior center together with associated parking, landscaping, utilities and site development the costs of which are to be paid by the I=1RA out of the tax increment derived from the District; and 16004 12/17/99 FRI 11:41 FAX 6123402644 DORSEY &WHITNEY WHEREAS, the r1RA and City desire to provide for the construction ofthe public library and senior center on the Subject Land on the conditions set forth herein. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and the mutual obligations set -forth in this Agreement, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows: -2- Z 005 12/17/99 FRI 11:41 FAX 6123402644 DORSEY & WHITNEY ARTICLE 1 Definitions Section 1.1. Def nitions. In this Agreement, unless a different meaning; clearly appears from the context: "Act" means Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 through 469.047. "Agreement" means this Agreement, as the same may be from time to time modified, S;imcnded or supplemented. "City" means the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation. "Existing Library" means the current public library located at 4701 West 50`h Street. "HRA" means the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota, a public body corporate and politic under the laws of the State of Minnesota. "Library" means an approximately 20,000 square foot public library together with related parking, landscaping, sidewalks, roadways, utilities and site development. "Project" means the construction on the Subject Land of the Library and Senior Center.. "Project Area" rnvans the area designated for redevelopment by the 1IRA pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan and the Act. "Redevelopment Plan" means the Grandview Area Redevelopment Plan of the HRA.: . "Section" means a Section of this Agreement, unless used in reference to Minnesota S':16atutes. "Senior Center" means an approximately 15,000 square foot senior center, together with related parking, landscaping, sidewalks, roadways, utilities and site development. "State" means the State of Minnesota. "Subject Land" means Kunz Oil, Lewis Engineering, the TAGS Building located at 5201 Eden Circle, the building located at 5244 Eden Circle, the Eden Pet Hospital building located at 5237 Eden Avenue and the Classic Hair Design building located at 5241 Eden Avenue. "Tax Increment" means tax increment as defined in the Tax Increment Act received by the HRA from the Tax Increment District. "Tax Increment Act" means Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174 through 469.179. -3- Ca 006 12/17/99 FRI 11:41 FAX 6123402644 DORSEY & WHITNEY "Tax Increment District" means the Grandview Tax Increment Financing District crea?.ed by the HRA pursuant to the Tax Increment Financing Plan and designated by Hennepin Courity as District No. 1202. "Tax Increment Financing Plan" means the Grandview Area Tax Increment Financing: Plan of the I IRA. ARTICLE 2 Representations and Warranties Section 2.1. By IIRA. HRA makes the following representations to Ri:developer: (a) HRA is a housing and redevelopment authority duly organized and:cxisting under the laws of Minnesota. Under the provisions of the Act, HRA has the power to enter into this Agreement and carry out its obligations hereunder. (b) The Redevelopment Project is a "redevelopment project" within the meaning of the Act and was created, adopted and approved in accordance with the terms of the Act. (c) The Tax Increment District is a "tax increment district" within the meaning of the Tax Tncrement Act and was established in accordance with the terms of the Tax Increment Act. Section 2:2. By City. The City represents and warrants that it is a municipal corporation duly organized and validly existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota, has power to enter into this Agreement, and carry out its obligations hereunder. ARTICLE 3 Construction of Library and Senior Center. and Acquisition of Existing Library Section 3.1 Construction of the Library and Senior Center. (a) The HRA agrees to construct the Library on the Subject Land in aci ordanee with drawings and specifications mutually agreed. upon by the iTRA and the Hennepin: County Library Board. The obligation of the HRA to construct the Library shall be subject to the execution of an agreement between the HRA and Hennepin County Library Board, which agreement provides that upon completion of the construction of the Library by the HRA, the HRA will.convey the Library to the Hennepin County Library Board in exchange for the conveyance by the Hennepin County Library Board of the Existing Library to the HRA. (b) The �IR.A agrees to construct the Senior Center on the Subject Land in accordance with drawings and specifications mutually agreed upon by the HRA and the City. -4- 16007 12/17/99 FRI 11:42 FAX 6123402644 DORSEY & %11ITNEY Upon completion of construction of the Senior Center, the HRA will transfer the Senior Center to the City. (c) The costs of the acquisition and construction of the Library and Senior Center shall be at the sole cost and expense of the LIRA and shall be paid by the HRA from Tax Increment. (d) Development by the HRA of the Library and Senior Center shall further be subject to the occurrence of the following events: (i) The HRA must obtain an environmental assessment worksheet (if required) and all other environmental reports and surveys deemed necessary for the portion of the Subject Land on which the Library and Senior Center are to be located and for the Existing Library; (ii) The City and HRA must obtain all necessary approvals for the . construction of the 'Library and Senior Center from the Nine Mile Watershed District and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District; and (iii) The City must grant all re- zoning approvals and conditional use: permits necessary to allow the construction of the Library and Senior Center. Section 3:2. Purchase of Existing Library by City. Upon the transfer by the Hennepin County Library Board of the Existing Library to the HRA, the City agrees to purchase the Existing Library from the HRA for $1,000,000, such amount to be payable by the City to the HRA in immediately available .funds upon the closing of the purchase of the Existing Library by the City. ARTICLE 4 Additional provisions Section 4.1 HRA and City Representatives Not Indi.vidualIy Liable. N]o member, official, consultant or the consultant's employees, or employee of the I1RA or the City shall be personally liable in the went of any default or breach by the HRA or of the terms of this Agreement. Section 4.2 Titles of Articles and Sections. Any titles of the several parts, Articles, and Sections of this Agreement are insetted for convenience of reference onl;,r and shall be disregarded in construing or interpreting any of its provisions. .5- 16 008 E 12/17/99 FRI 11:42 FAX 6123402644 DORSEY & WHITNEY Section 4.3 Notices and Demands. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, a notice, demand, or ether communication under this Agreement by either party to the other shall be sufficiently given or delivered if it is dispatched by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, or delivered personally as follows: (a) in the case of City, addressed to or delivered personally to the City Manager, 4801 West 50" Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424, (b) in the case of the HRA, addressed or delivered personal l.y to the H ~A's Executive Director, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota 55424; or at such other address with respect to any such patty as that party may, from time to time, designate in writing and forward to the other parties as provided in this Section. Section 4.4 Countcryarts. This Agrcement is executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall constitute one and the same instrument. IVII Z009 12/17/99 FRI 11:42 FAX 6123402644 DORSEY & WHITNEY IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be duly executed as of the date first above written. HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDiNA, MINNESOTA By_ Its By Its CITY OF EDINA By Its Mayor By Its Manager STATE OF M11NNESo,rA )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of December, 1999 by , and , being the and , respectively, of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota, a public body corporate and politic. Notary Public -7- 4 010 in 12/17/99 FRI 11:43 FAX 6123402644 DORSEY & WHITNEY 16011 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) -The foreaoino i.nstzument was acknowledged before me this ,_day of December, 1999 by , and , being the and respectively, of the City of Edina, a municipal corporation. -8- Notary Public i ok e ,Y �° Pro REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Edina Housing & Redevelopment Authority, FROM: Francis Hoffman, City Engineer VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: 21 December, 1999 AGENDA ITEM HRA. III ITEM DESCRIPTION: Centennial Lakes South Park Improvements, Contract 99- 3(HRA) Improvement No. R -18 Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Thomas and Sons Construction, Inc. 1. $ 785,436.00 2. A & L Construction Inc. 2..$ 878,420.45 3. Environmental Associates, Inc. 3. $1,042,967.20 RECOMMENDED QUOTE, OR BID: Thomas and Sons Construction, Inc. GENERAL INFORMATION: $ 785,436.00 The South Park Improvement is the last major public bid for all of Centennial Lakes. This includes the south pond adjacent to the Building Area ,5 and Ramp Area 5. The work includes colored concrete pavement, landscaping, lighting, sound system, miscellaneous furniture and furnishings and park signage. The low bid was by the current contractor finishing work on the North Park area and recent South Park area. The recommendation is to award this project. The majority of the work is for the year 2000: The project is funded through HRA funds. The engineer's estimate is $897,938.00. Sig ur The Recommended Bid is within-budget not within budget Public Works - Engineering Department rl(Id11GC UII GI+IV� COUNCIL CHECK h _STER 15- DEC -.1999 (16:u_, page .1 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM -----------------------------=------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 13509 12/21/99 $12,083.65 BRW INC. Architect Fees 267 -0800 CENTENNIAL LAK PRO FEE ARCH /E 12/21/99 $12,444.39 BRW INC. Architect Fees 515 -0010 CENTENNIAL LAK PRO FEE ARCH /E < *> $24,528.04* 13510 12/21/99 $28.00 Eckels, Dr. Donald HRA Parking Permits R 120199 50TH STREET PARKING PERMIT < *> $28.00* 13511 12/21/99 $500.00 Mid -North Financial Sery Legal Fees 112999 CENTENNIAL LAK PRO FEES LEG /S < *> $500.00* 13512 12/21/99 $11,095.30 THOMAS & SONS CONSTRUCTI Final Contract 98 -3 P 122199 CENTENNIAL LAK PARKS < *> $11,095.30* 13513 12/21/99 $36,829.06 THOMAS & SONS CONSTRUCTI Contract Payment #2 (.12/21/99 CENTENNIAL LAK PARKS < *> $36,829.06* 13514 12/21/99 $498.85 Walker Parking Consultan Ramp Design 210893 50TH STREET PRO FEE ARCH /E 12/21/99 $4,650.00 Walker Parking Consultan Ramp Repairs /Design 210907 50TH STREET PRO FEE ARCH /E < *> $5,148.85* $78,129.25* COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY 15- DEC -1999 (16:04) page 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ FUND # 01 HOUSING & REDEVELOP AUTHOR $78,129.25 $78,129:25* MINUTES OF THE JOINT MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL AND THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY HELD AT CITY HALL DECEMBER 7,1999 - 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Faust, Hovland, Kelly and Mayor Maetzold. Member Johnson entered the meeting at 7:07 p.m. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Kelly and seconded by Member Faust approving the Council Consent Agenda as presented.. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF NOVEMBER 16, 1999, APPROVED_ Motion made by Member Kelly and seconded by Member Faust approving the minutes of the November 16, 1999, Regular Council Meeting. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. JOINT HRA/CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING HELD RESOLUTIONS ADOPTED AMENDING GRANDVIEW AREA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Manager Hughes stated the proposed amendments to the Grandview Area Redevelopment Plan and the Grandview Tax Increment Financing Plan are necessary to facilitate the redevelopment of properties. located south of Eden Avenue. The amendments would also provide the necessary authority for the HRA to pursue the acquisition of privately held properties which may be included in the redevelopment proposed by Opus Construction and Ron Clark Construction. The amendment to the Redevelopment Project consists of (i) the acquisition and redevelopment by the HRA or another party of all or a portion of the Redevelopment Property not previously acquired by the HRA, (ii) the construction by the HRA, the City or another party on the Redevelopment Property of a public library and senior center and (iii) other public redevelopment costs incurred in connection with the redevelopment of the Redevelopment Property. The estimated proposed additional expenses of tax increment related to the acquisition and redevelopment are as follows: Acquisition of Property $3,100,000 Construction of library 2,860,000 Construction of senior center 2,145,000 Parking & Site Development 3,940,000 Demolition 500,000 Financing Costs 175,000 Off -site Improvements 500,000 Administration 500,000 Sub -total $13,720,000 Contingency 10% 1,372,000 TOTAL $15,092,000 Page 1 S Minutes/Edina City Council/December 7,1999 Mr. Hughes added .that as prescribed by State Law; a copy of the proposed Amendments to the Redevelopment Plan and Tax Increment Finance Plan were provided to Hennepin County and Independent School District 273. He noted receipt of a response from Hennepin County via a memorandum written by Sandra L. Vargas, County Administrator to the Board of Commissioners. The Hennepin County response supports the proposed amendment. Mr. Hughes stated that no response had been received from School District 273. Member Kelly asked if the Wanner property had been included in the Grandview Area Redevelopment Area. Mr. Hughes using a map to show the property on the eastern side of the, proposed redevelopment area, pointed out the Wanner property and said it was included in the proposed redevelopment area. Member Kelly stated he remained concerned regarding construction of a new library. He wants to make sure the City does not give greater value than it receives in return. This does not necessarily need to be actual dollars, but it should be something of value. Mayor Maetzold noted a possibility exists that meeting or auditorium space may be constructed that the City could use for public meetings. Member Johnson added he believed staff understands the Council's concern and should be allowed to negotiate the best possible deal. Member Faust asked if the proposed amendment is what is necessary to meet the. December 31, 1999, deadline with the State of Minnesota. Mr. Hughes explained the amendment must be approved in order for the redevelopment to take place. However, the City must have a Letter of Intent with their developer by December 31, 1999, in order to use the tax increment fund in this district as proposed. Member Faust said she had been contacted by Vernon Terrace with a request for a presentation of the proposed redevelopment. She asked about the timing of such a presentation and if the developer should be requested to make the presentation. Mr. Hughes replied he believed that the developer should make the presentation and that Tom Lund could be contacted immediately and requested to schedule a time with the residents of Vernon Terrace. Member Faust expressed her hope that the architecture of the redevelopment be different than Vernon Terrace. She asked if the redevelopment would follow the normal planning process per Edina's Code. Mr. Hughes assured her the redevelopment would follow the same planning process as a totally private development. He added he believed it was too early in the process to know in any detail the proposed architecture of the redevelopment. Member Hovland commented that the Council's desire for the redevelopment was to see architecture significant for the space involved. He suggested that as the design is developed that design standards could be legally set forth if deemed necessary. Continuing, Member Hovland stated that perhaps actually taking legal action would be premature. Member Faust advised that in her experience, standards need be in place before a project begins. Mr. Hughes reminded the Council that the City owns half of the property involved in the proposed redevelopment; and therefore the City is in a very strong position to suggest design priorities. Mr. Hughes recommended that the Council not develop any design standards at this time. Member Johnson voiced concern over the financing for the construction and operation of the Senior Center. Member Kelly agreed and suggested a very specific use agreement be delineated. Mayor Maetzold reminded that the Senior Center. would be a City building. Mr. Hughes reiterated the Senior Center would be a City facility managed by the City. Member Johnson asked if the Senior Center would be self- supporting. Mr. Hughes responded that the City currently operates the existing Page 2 Minutes/Edina City Council/December 7,1999 Senior Citizen Center located in the Community Center and it is not self- supporting. He said the operation of the new Senior Center may be reviewed and a decision made regarding whether or not the seniors should take greater responsibility in its operation. Member Hovland commented that he saw the entire project as somewhat fluid, meaning that many changes may transpire over time regarding the size and design of the components. He added that he recalled the construction of a new library was recommended by staff as the best alternative to solve some facility expansion issues for the City. Mayor Maetzold called for public comment. No one spoke. Mayor Maetzold made a motion seconded by Member Johnson to close the public hearing. Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold. Motion carried. Member Hovland introduced the following resolution and made a motion for its approval: RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO GRANDVIEW REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1, GRANDVIEW AREA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND GRANDVIEW TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN AND MAKING FINDINGS WITH RESPECT THERETO BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota as follows: 1. The Commissioners of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "HRA ") and the City of Edina, Minnesota (the. "City "), have previously approved the Grandview Area Redevelopment Plan (the "Redevelopment Plan ") and Grandview Redevelopment Project No. 1 (the "Redevelopment Project ") to be undertaken pursuant thereto, and in order to finance the public redevelopment costs to be incurred by the City and the HRA in connection with the Redevelopment Plan and Redevelopment Project, the HRA and the City have approved Grandview Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "Financing Plan "), which establishes a tax increment financing district which is designated by the HRA as the Grandview Tax Increment Financing District (Hennepin County No. 1202) (the "District "). On April 7, 1997, the HRA and City approved an amendment to the Redevelopment Plan, Redevelopment Project and Financing Plan (the "1997 Amendment "). The HRA has approved an amendment to the Redevelopment Project, the Redevelopment Plan and the Tax Increment Financing Plan, as amended by the 1997 Amendment, which is entitled "Amendments to Grandview Redevelopment Project No. 1, Grandview Area Redevelopment Plan and Grandview Tax Increment Financing Plan" (the "1999 Amendment "). The 1999 Amendment authorizes the acquisition and redevelopment by the HRA of the property in the area subject to the Redevelopment Plan and the additional expenditures of tax increment revenues derived from the District to pay public redevelopment costs of the acquisition and redevelopment of such property. by the HRA or another party, including costs of a public library and senior center, and to pay administrative expenses of the HRA and City. 2. This Council on December 7, 1999, held a public hearing on the 1999 Amendment after notice of the public hearing was published in the official newspaper of the City not less than ten (10) days prior to the date of the hearing. At such public hearing all persons desiring to be heard with respect to the 1999 Amendment were given an opportunity to express their views with respect thereto. 3. This Council has previously found that the District is a redevelopment district within the scope of Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subdivision 10 and the Amendment will Page 3 Minutes/Edina C y Council/December 7,1999 not change such prior findings. The 1999 Amendment further serves the original goals and objectives of the City and HRA in approving the Redevelopment Plan, the Redevelopment Project and the Financing Plan and the 1997 Amendment, by redeveloping property in the City in order to prevent or reduce blight, blighting factors and the causes of blight, and by providing needed public facilities. , 4. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, subdivision 4, it is hereby found that: (A) The District, is a redevelopment district, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subdivision 10, for the reasons set forth in previous findings by this Council, and the 1999 Amendment does not alter these previous findings. . (B) The proposed development to be undertaken in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan, as amended by the 1999 Amendment, in the opinion of this Council would not occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and therefor the use of tax increment financing is deemed necessary. (C) The Financing Plan, as amended by the 1999 Amendment, conforms to the general plan for the development of the City as a whole. (D) The Financing Plan, as amended by the 1999 Amendment, will afford maximum opportunity consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole for the development of the area subject to. Redevelopment Plan by private enterprise. (E) The City confirms its election of the method of tax increment computation set forth in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, subdivision 3, clause (a) with respect to the District. Passed by the Council this 7th day of December, 1999. Attest: Debra A. Mangen Dennis F. Maetzold Adopted this 7th day of December, 1999. Member Kelly seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold Motion carried. RESOLUTION ADOPTED UPHOLDING ZONING BOARD OF APPEAL'S DENIAL OF VARIANCE REQUEST, 7133 VALLEY VIEW ROAD Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Assistant Planner Aaker stated that the Zoning Board of Appeals, on September 16, 1999, heard and tabled. Lyubov and Eduard Yamnik's variance request from the frontyard setback requirements to allow them to locate a garage in their frontyard. Ms. Aaker explained that subject property is characterized by steep slopes and is heavily wooded. Extensive use of retaining walls were necessary to develop the property. The Yamnik's desire to construct an in- ground garage fronting Valley View Road. The proposed garage would cut through the lower retaining wall beneath the existing driveway. Due to the existing vegetation it is difficult to see the retaining wall during the summer months. The existing house provides a 37 -foot setback. The garage door opening would be flush with an existing retaining wall and would be the only visible part of the garage. The required setback for any Page 4 Minutes/Edina City Council/December 7,1999 new structure on the lot would be 47 feet. The proposed garage would provide a 10 -foot setback requiring a 37 -foot variance. The current wooded condition of the lot is typical of the Indian Hills area. Ms. Aaker reported that staff does not support the variance request because development of a garage would significantly alter the wooded condition to the detriment of the neighborhood. Since the property meets code with respect to garage stalls no hardship is present. On November 18; 1999, the homeowners returned to the Zoning Board with no change in their plan. The Zoning Board denied the requested variance. Ms. Aaker added that within the neighborhood the steep driveway is not unique. Proponents Lyubov and Eduard Yamnik, 7133 Valley View Road, presented their request for a variance. Mrs. Yamnik explained that they were not seeking the variance to allow additional garage space, but because they feel their driveway and access are too dangerous. Since the existing retaining wall is deteriorated and needs repair, the Yamnik felt this was the opportune time to build a garage at the lower level. Mr. Yamnik showed a home video depicting their home, driveway, the state of the existing retaining walls, the current access onto Valley View and the proposed location of the new garage and driveway accessing Valley View. Council Discussion/ Action Member Faust said she noticed it looked like there would be room to add to the existing garage on the north side. She stated she would possibly be willing to grant some relief for an addition to the existing garage, but not for the requested 37 .foot frontyard variance. Member Faust said the requested variance is too large and that other homes in the neighborhood have even steeper driveways. For this reason she does not believe an undue hardship exists so there would be no reason to grant any kind of variance. Member Kelly voiced his agreement with Member Faust. Member Hovland questioned whether any option existed where the existing driveway grade could be reduced. He thought he could support a variance if a modification to the existing driveway and garage were sought. Member Hovland also stated he did not believe the requested variance represented an undue hardship, therefore he would not support the variance. Mayor Maetzold suggested that the Yamniks investigate other options, such as heating coils installed under the surface of the driveway, or. some other options to ameliorate their problem with winter conditions. He added he also would not support the requested variance. Member Johnson made a motion, seconded by Member Kelly to close the hearing. Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold Motion carried. Member Faust introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the Edina Zoning Board of Appeals on the 17th of October, 1999, did review and unanimously deny the request for a variance from setback to allow a garage to encroach into the frontyard setback at 7133 Valley View Road; and WHEREAS, the property owners Lyubov and Eduard Yamnik did appeal the aforementioned variance denial within the prescribed time to the Edina City Council; and Page 5 Minutes/Edina City Council/December 7,1999 WHEREAS, the Edina City Council held a public hearing where the appellants were allowed to state their request, public testimony was taken. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council upholds the Zoning Board of Appeals' denial of the requested variance to allow the location of garage within the frontyard setback at 7133 Valley View Road. Adopted this 7th day of December, 1999. Member Hovland seconded the motion. Rollcall; Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold Resolution approved. *LOT DIVISION AT 5300 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH APPROVED Motion made by Member Kelly and seconded by Member Faust introducing the following resolution and moving its approval: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the following described properties are at present single tracts of land: PARCEL 1: Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, SOUTH HARRIET PARK, 2ND ADDITION, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, and Lot 3, Block 1, SOUTH HARRIET. PARK, 2ND ADDITION, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, and Lots 4 and 6, Block 1, SOUTH HARRIET PARK, 2ND ADDITION, according to the plat.thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, and Lot 5, Block 1, SOUTH HARRIET PARK, 2ND ADDITION, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, and Lot 7, Block 1, SOUTH HARRIET PARK, 2ND ADDITION; according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, and Lots, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17, and Lot 9, except the East 150.00 feet thereof, and the Easterly 45.00 feet of Lots 19, 20, and 21; and that part of Lots 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 30, 31, 32, and 33, lying East of the following described line: Commencing at a point on the South line of said Lot 24 a distance of 63.00 feet West of the Southeast corner thereof; thence North to a point on the North line of said Lot 28 a distance of 84.00 feet West of the Northeast corner thereof; thence continuing North along the last described line extended to its intersection with the North line of said Lot 33, said point of intersection being the actual point of beginning of the line being described; thence South along the last described line extended South to its intersection with the South line of said Lot 22 and there terminating; and that part of Lot 29, described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of said Lot 29; thence West along the South line of said Lot 29 a distance of 84.0 feet; thence North to a point on the North line of said Lot 29 which is 81.7 feet West of the Northeast corner of said Lot 29; thence East along the North line thereof a distance of 81.7 feet to the Northeast corner of said Lot 29; thence South along the East line of said Lot 29 to the Southeast corner of said Lot 29 and the point of beginning; all in Block 1, South Harriet Park 2 ^a Addition, according to the plat thereof on file Page 6 Minutes/Edina City Council/December 7,1999 and of record in the office of the County Recorder, .in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, and Except the easterly 150.00 feet of Lot .10, Block 1, SOUTH HARRIET PARK 2ND ADDITION, according to the plat thereof on file. and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, and That part of Lot 18, Block 1, SOUTH HARRIET PARK 2ND ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin .County, Minnesota, lying .Westerly and Southerly of a line described as beginning at the Southeast corner of the West 33.50 feet of said Lot 18; thence North 0 degrees 00 minutes 29 seconds East, a assumed bearing, along the east line of said West 33.50 feet of Lot 18 a distance of 137.60 feet; thence Westerly a distance of 26.45 feet along a non - tangential curve, concave to the North, having a radius of 38.42 feet, a central angle of 39 degrees 26 minutes 36 seconds and a chord bearing of North 79 degrees 32 minutes 39 seconds west to the East line of the West 8.00 feet of said Lot 18; thence North 0 degrees 00 minutes 29 seconds East along said East line of the West 8.00 feet of Lot 18 to the north line of said Lot 18 and said line there terminating. PARCEL 2: The north 100 feet of Lot 18, Block 1, SOUTH HARRIET PARK 2ND ADDITION according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota. PARCEL 3: The west 100 feet of the East 244 feet of the South 150 feet and the West 19 feet of the South 50 feet of the East 144 feet, Lot 18, Block 1, SOUTH HARRIET PARK 2ND ADDITION according to the plat and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the owners have requested the subdivision of said tracts into separate parcels (herein called "Parcels ") described as follows: PARCEL 1: Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, SOUTH HARRIET PARK, 2N6 ADDITION, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, and Lot 3, Block 1, SOUTH HARRIET PARK, 2ND ADDITION, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, and Lots 4 and 6, Block 1, SOUTH HARRIET PARK, 2ND ADDITION, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, and Lot 5, Block 1, SOUTH HARRIET PARK, 2ND ADDITION, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, and Lot 7, Block 1, SOUTH HARRIET PARK, 2ND ADDITION, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, and Page 7 Minutes/Edina City Council/December 7,1999 Lots, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17, and Lot 9, except the East 150.00 feet thereof, and the Easterly 45.00 feet of Lots 19, 20, and 21; and that part of Lots 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 30, 31, 32, and 33, lying East of the following described line: Commencing at a point on the South line of said Lot 24 a distance of 63.00 feet West of the Southeast corner thereof; thence North to a point on the North line of said Lot 28 a distance of 84.00 feet West of the Northeast corner thereof; thence continuing North along the last described line extended to its intersection with the North line of said Lot 33, said point of intersection being the actual point of beginning of the line being described; thence South along the last described line extended South to its intersection with the South line of said Lot 22 and there terminating; and that part of Lot 29, described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of said Lot 29; thence West along the South line of said Lot 29 a distance of 84.0 feet; thence North to a point on the North line of said Lot 29 which is 81.7 feet West of the Northeast corner of said Lot 29; thence East along the North line thereof a distance of 81.7 feet to the Northeast corner of said Lot 29; thence South along the East line of said Lot 29 to the Southeast corner of said Lot 29 and the point of beginning; all in Block 1, South Harriet Park 2nd Addition, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, and Except the easterly 150.00 feet of Lot 10, Block 1, SOUTH HARRIET PARK 2ND ADDITION, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, and That part of Lot 18, Block 1, SOUTH HARRIET PARK 2ND ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying Westerly and Southerly of a line described as beginning at the Southeast. corner of the West 33.50 feet of said Lot 18; thence North 0 degrees 00 minutes 29 seconds East, a assumed bearing, along the east line of said West 33.50 feet of Lot 18 a distance of 137.60 feet; thence Westerly a distance of 26.45 feet along a non - tangential curve, concave to the North, having a radius of 38.42 feet, a central angle of 39 degrees 26 minutes 36 seconds and a chord bearing of North 79 degrees 32 minutes 39 seconds west to the East line of the West 8.00 feet of said Lot 18; thence North 0 degrees 00 minutes 29 seconds East along said East line of the West 8.00 feet of Lot 18 to the north line of said Lot 18 and said line there terminating, and The West 8.00 feet of that part of Lot 18, Block 1, SOUTH HARRIET PARK 2ND ADDITION according to the plat on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying northerly of the South 150.00 feet of said Lot 18, and except for: That part of the West 49.50 feet of the South 150.00. feet of Lot 18, Block 1, SOUTH HARRIET PARK 2ND ADDITION, on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying Westerly and Southerly of a line described as beginning at the Southeast corner of the West 33.50 feet of said Lot 18; thence North 0 degrees 00 minutes 29 seconds East, assumed bearing, along the East line of said West 33.50 feet of said Lot 18 a distance of 137.60 feet; thence Westerly a distance of 26.45 feet along a non - tangential curve, concave to the north, having a radius of 38.42 feet, a central angle of 39 degrees 26 minutes 36 seconds and a chord bearing of North 79 degrees 32 minutes 39 seconds West to the East line of the west 8.00 feet of said Lot 18; thence North 0 degrees 00 minutes 29 seconds East along said East line of the West 8.00 feet of Lot 18 to the North line of said South 150.00 feet of Lot 18 and said line there terminating. Page 8 Minutes/Edina City Council/December 7,1999 PARCEL 2: The north 100 feet, except for the West 8 feet of that part of Lot 18, Block 1, SOUTH HARRIET PARK 2ND ADDITION according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota lying northerly of the South 150 feet of said Lot 18. PARCEL 3: The west 100 feet of the East 244 feet of the South 150 feet and the West 19 feet of the South 50 feet of the East 144 feet, Lot 18, Block 1, SOUTH HARRIET PARK 2ND ADDITION according to the plat and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota, and That part of the West 49.50 feet of the South 150.00 feet of Lot 18, Block 1, SOUTH HARRIET PARK 2ND ADDITION, on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying Westerly and Southerly of a line described as beginning at the Southeast corner of the West 33.50 feet of said Lot 18; thence North 0 degrees 00 minutes 29 seconds East, assumed bearing, along the East line of said West 33.50 feet of said Lot 18 a distance of 137.60 feet; thence Westerly a distance of 26.45 feet along a non - tangential curve, . concave to the north, having a radius of 38.42 feet, a central angle of 39 degrees 26 minutes 36 seconds and a chord bearing of North 79 degrees 32 minutes 39 seconds West to the East line of the west 8.00 feet of said Lot 18; thence North 0 degrees 00 minutes 29 seconds East along said East line of the West 8.00 feet of Lot 18 to the North line of said South 150.00 feet of Lot 18 and said line there terminating. WHEREAS, the requested subdivision is authorized under Code Section 810 and it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purpose of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Code Sections 810 and 850; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of the second above described Parcels as separate tracts of land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of code Sections 850 and 810 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but only to the. extent permitted under Code Sections 810 and 850 subject to the limitations set out in Code Section 850 and said Ordinances are not waived for any other purpose or as to any other provisions thereof, and further subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be. made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent Ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those Ordinances. Adopted this 7th day of December, 1999. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *HEARING DATE OF DECEMBER 21 1999, SET FOR PLANNING MATTER Motion made by Member Kelly and seconded by Member Faust setting December 21; 1999, as hearing date for . Preliminary Rezoning and Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Map for Haugland Company, Tracts A and B, Registered Land Survey No 1378 Hennepin County, Minnesota. Generally located east of Highway 169, west of Lincoln Drive and south of.Londonderry Drive. Correspondence was received from Mr. & Mrs. Larry Mosow, 6877 Langford Drive, voicing their displeasure with the proposed rezoning by the Haugland Company. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. Page 9 Minutes/Edina City Council/December 7,1999 *BID AWARDED FOR GMC' /z TON SIERRA PICK -UP TRUCK Motion made by Member Kelly and seconded by Member Faust for award of bid for one GMC 1/2 ton Sierra pick -up truck to recommended low bidder, Falls Automotive, Inc., under State Bid Contract #421925 at $20,247.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. . *BID AWARDED FOR 20 ELECTRIC GOLF CARS Motion made by Member Kelly and seconded by Member Faust for award of bid for 20 electric golf cars to recommended low bidder, E -Z Go Textron, at $47,900.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. FREEWAY NOISE MITIGATION REPORT HEARDIPETITION RECEIVED Engineer Hoffman explained that ten years ago a study to mitigate freeway noise at Highway 100 and 50th Street North was undertaken. The effort did not go far. In 1997, the State put out a report recognizing 800 plus sites needing noise mitigation. ,The State had funding for 54 of the sites. One of the "funded sites' was in Edina, on Highway 100 north of 44th Street and east of Highway 100 towards St. Louis Park. In 1998, when the list was completed, residents abutting the Crosstown Highway 62 came forward and voiced their concerns. At that time, the Council directed staff to work with the residents. The result is the Noise Mitigation Report. Mr. Hoffman said the purpose of the study was to find ways to utilize to engage other agencies in developing policies, and solicit funding for noise .mitigation improvements. Ten strategies were outlined in the report. Staff has mailed 860 letters to residents as well as executive summaries of the report recently. Neighborhood meetings have been held and were well- attended. Engineer Hoffman continued with excerpts from, the Executive Summary of the Noise Mitigation Study: • Work with Mn /DOT on a cost - sharing basis to provide privacy fencing and landscaping as part of the TH 100 and TH 62 major maintenance projects that are currently scheduled. Mn /DOT has indicated a willingness to participate in 50 percent of the cost of lightweight privacy fencing in these projects where the replacement of chain link fences is scheduled and where existing chain link fence is outside the clear zone. • Work aggressively with the Legislature to establish a state funding source for retrofit noise mitigation, privacy fencing and /or landscaping. • Determine an appropriate level of local funding for fencing and landscaping and leverage those funds to gain higher levels of state and federal participation in projects. . . • Identify demonstration projects that might fit the criteria for TEA -21 Enhancement, Livable Communities and Local Road Research Board funding and apply for grants. These funds have not yet been successfully used for noise abatement projects. • Establish policies and procedures that ensure excess fill materials from City projects are made available for use as noise berms wherever space is available. In addition, work with Mn /DOT, Hennepin County and private contractors to obtain excess fill for this purpose. • Work with private property owners to identify locations where excess fill could be placed on private property for noise mitigation purposes. • Participate in the Mn /DOT Community Roadside Landscaping Partnership Program to the greatest extent possible, providing supplemental funds so that more mature planting materials can be used. • Establish policies, procedures and design standards for the provision of fencing and landscaping in all residential areas along freeways. • Establish a local cost - sharing policy for fencing and landscaping. The following is suggested, but does not reflect current state or federal statutes - 50 percent state/ federal funding Page 10 Minutes/Edina City Council/December 7,1999 - 25 percent (general city funds) - 25 percent neighborhood (special assessments, private funds, in -kind contributions) Involve neighborhoods in the final design of fencing and noise walls and in the selection of landscaping materials. _ Mr. Hoffman noted that a petition had been received from neighbors in the Cascade, Laura Lane and North Avenue area recommending a 60/30/10 split on who will pay for the mitigation. Council Comment Mayor. Maetzold inquired to what extent levy limits impact on the City's ability to fund something like this. Manager Hughes answered taxes could be raised enough to maintain a level of service. Other capital improvements or maintenance items could not be funded, at this point. Mayor Maetzold commented that a funding source would need to be found. Member Kelly asked for clarification on levy limits for the residents in attendance. Mr. Hughes said under current State Law, the City is limited in the amount the tax levy can be increased. In 2000, it is a function of what it levied in 1999. Under State Law this year the tax levy was raised about 3 %. Member Kelly reiterated that the State has ham- strung us on Capital Improvement Projects. We cannot increase taxes in an amount that is greater than the levy limit. If the project is to be funded, an alternative means of funding must be. secured. Most likely the funds would be secured from the benefited property owners. Mr. Hoffman pointed out some residents had expressed their willingness to pay a portion of the cost of the noise mitigation. Member Kelly added one concern is what to do with cut- through traffic and speeding in the City. Their have been extensive talks about the installation of sidewalks, particularly around schools but due to levy limits the funds to do this are not available. State Representative Erhardt commented that levy limits are in place to prevent local units of government from levying back what the State has done to hold property taxes down. During the past several years, the State has put in millions of dollars for property tax relief. There is a formula that each local government uses which includes a growth factor. He reminded the Council that the legislature has allowed cities to go to the residents to raise additional funds by way of a referendum. Member Hovland added when local government aid is given to cities by the State, the State requires accountability. Although Edina does not receive local government aid, the issue was raised whether it would be a viable proposition to eliminate levy limits to cities who receive no local government aid from the State. Rep. Erhardt commented the idea could be entertained in the future., Member Hovland stated if that concept has viability it may be worth at least thinking about it in a tax policy possibility with . the State. He said there is a boat -load of money in St. Paul and further inquired whether the retrofit noise mitigation legislation could be brought up again as this is not only a problem in Edina. He believes the Edina City Council would be willing to develop a comprehensive plan including noise mitigation. He asked for Rep. Erhardt's help. Rep. Erhardt asked for a copy of the Noise Mitigation Study and said he would do what he could to bring this issue back before the legislature. Assistant Manager Smith gave Rep. Erhardt Public Comment Richard Holetz, 4905 Sunnyside Road, stated he has lived in his home since 1942. Mr. Holetz said that Highway 100 is a State road, therefore the State is in violation of state and federal statutes. Mr. Holetz urged that Member Hovland's comments about the nature of the noise issue be put into some formal action and taken to the State for a response. Member Hovland noted that waiting until February is much too long and the process should be in motion well before the session begins. Page 11 Minutes/Edina City Council/December 7,1999 Member Johnson asked from an intergovernmental standpoint, shouldn't similarly affected cities be included in the comprehensive report. He asked who has funded the existing sound barriers in place now. Member Hovland stated he believes they are partially funded by federal and local dollars. Engineer Hoffman stated if the roadway is a new construction, sound walls are a requirement. Member Hovland offered to poll the I -494 Corridor Commission members to discern whether they have noise mitigation issues in their City. He stated a joint powers agreement between the concerned cities may be an appropriate action. Bill Freeman, 4600 Cascade Lane, said he was a 30 year resident. Mr. Freeman noted that he lived on Cascade Lane when Highway 100 was built. He asked if the Council had considered the use of G.O. Improvement bonds as a method of financing the needed noise mitigation improvements. Mike Croke, 4508 Laura Avenue, stated that if a twelve foot wall is built he would loose his view. Mr. Croke said that the committee members in his area who circulated a petition for a potential noise mitigation improvement proposed that his property which is abutting the highway pay $7,000.00 towards the cost of the improvement. Mr. Croke said he does not want.to pay that high a level for any improvement. Steve Snyder, 4601 Sunnyside Road, explained that he lived east of Highway 100 and north of the Mill Pond. Mr. Snyder said the noise level is unacceptable. He added that in his neighborhood property owners even further from the freeway than he, would probably support contributing to a noise mitigation improvement. . Karen Lydon, 5005 West 56t Street, thanked the City for the informational letter. Ms. Lydon asked if a project is constructed would she be specially assessed for the improvement. Mr. Hoffman explained that the noise mitigation study was directed by the Council approximately a year ago. He said he has been working with ad hoc committees from various sections of Edina affected by freeway noise. Ms. Lydon stated she does not have a problem with noise and does not want to participate in the cost of any improvement. She urged the Council to remember that many persons who were not in attendance may also not want any mitigation on their behalf. Ed Kaisler, 6216 Rolf Avenue, thanked the committee for their work. He said that something is necessary and asked if an improvement reducing the noise level by 5 -6 dB were built what sound level would that be correlated to. Mr. Kaisler added that he did not believe a sound barrier will resolve the problem. He related that his home has been on the market for six weeks and that 80% of the potential buyers brought to his home by realtors do not make it all the way to the door because of the noise. Mr. Kaisler noted that he believes within five years the State will be improving Highway 62 to three lanes in each direction and he cautioned the Council not to jump into anything since the State would most likely build sound walls when they improve the highway. John Palmer, 5101 West 62nd Street, said he was an eleven year resident of the area of Highways 62 and 100. He has seen a significant increase in volume and intensity of traffic. Mr. Palmer believed the increase has affected the property value of his home. He questioned whether there was a legal precedent to proceed on, since the State was not meeting their own noise statutes. Member Kelly said the program that is developed be presented to the State to make our case for State funds .must say there is a non - compliance issue which makes the case even more compelling. Mr. Hoffman explained the State and the Legislature are well-aware of the non - compliance issue. Member Johnson inquired whether there was a bi- partisan way to raise noise mitigation to a higher priority. Rep. Erhardt said he did not know, but would pursue the issue. Page 12 Minutes/Edina City Council/December 7,1999 Tim Crain, 4952 Poppy Lane, complimented the Engineering Department for crafting a study that met the needs of the citizens. Mr. Crain urged the Council to move forward as per the recommendations of the study. Sue Seckinger, 4912 Sunnyside Road, stated she was a member of the ad hoc committee that had suggested the proposals depicted in the study as 100- O, N, P, Q, R, and S. Ms. Seckinger said she would not like to see neighborhoods pitted against one another and suggested that if portions of the suggested improvements are built, they be done in pairs to reduce the possibility of "noise bounce", across the highways. She asked if there would be a possibility of capturing some type of "gas tax rebate" to finance noise mitigation improvements. Mayor Maetzold said that is an idea that should be pursued. Engineer Hoffman said the problem the State looks at is the cost benefit to build something like this. Member Faust asked how St. Louis Park got 100 -R approved. Mr. Hoffman answered that 100 -R is one of the 54 sections selected and has been deemed cost effective. Ms. Seckinger submitted a copy of the information provided to, neighbors prior to the meeting December 7, 1999. Dave Price, 4370 Vernon Avenue, said while he favored the proposal, the City should be careful what they ask for from the State. Morgan Brown, 5033 Normandale Court, urged the Council to keep the process moving forward. He added that he is sympathetic to those residents who do not want to pay for any improvement, but residents also need to realize that it is very unlikely the State would pay 100% of the cost of improvements. He suggested that Rep. Erhardt and the City Council request the State not build the proposed "trolley" and instead earmark those dollars for noise mitigation. Steve MaKredes, 4916 West Sunnyslope Road, asked if the State has a plan to overlay Highway 100 or the 62 Crosstown with asphalt and what effect that overlay would have on noise mitigation. Mr. Hoffman said he was not aware of any plan to overlay the aforementioned roadways. Mr. MaKredes said it seems like a lot of effort being expended on solving only half a problem. Council Discussion Mayor Maetzold noted closure would not be reached'tonight but that the preceding comments and discussion is a part of the total process. Manager Hughes indicated this is not an issue that will be solved overnight. It is staff's recommendation to accept the report and have the issue back on the agenda in a couple of months. In the meantime, he suggested staff craft some ideas to be passed on to our legislators prior to February 1 or prior to the beginning date of the next legislative session. Member Hovland asked for resolution of whether noise mitigation should be part of the overall comprehensive plan. He stated he liked the idea of a transportation utility being created because we are all in this together. He explained that he too lives close to the freeway. Member Hovland reminded the Council that during the sewer backup problem time, all the . residents paid for that . cleanup. He asked that funding options be included in the staff report. Member Faust thanked the neighbors for putting forth their effort and it proves how individuals can work together and make a difference. Mayor Maetzold echoed Member Faust's gratitude. No Council action was taken. Page 13 Minutes/Edina Cii_y Council/December 7,1999 *RESOLUTION ADOPTED AUTHORIZING TRANSFER OF INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE TREATMENT SYSTEM REGULATION TO HENNEPIN COUNTY Motion made by Member Kelly and seconded by Member Faust introducing the following resolution and moving its approval: RESOLUTION TRANSFERRING MINNESOTA AGENCY RULES 7080 TO HENNEPIN COUNTY WHEREAS the City of Edina has been enforcing the individual sewage treatment system Rules as set for in the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Rules Chapter 7080 and, WHEREAS, Hennepin County has enacted Hennepin County Ordinance No. 19, adopting Minnesota Rules Chapter 7080, and WHEREAS, Hennepin County is prepared to enforce these Rules in Edina and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina finds that Hennepin County Ordinance No. 19 provides for the same protection of public health, and welfare. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Edina hereby transfers the responsibility of enforcing Minnesota Agency Rules 7080 to Hennepin County and, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that David A. Velde be designated as the agent to act on behalf of the Edina City Council in transferring records held by the City of Edina to Hennepin County. Dated this 7th day of December, 1999. Attest: Debra A. Mangen Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. Dennis F. Maetzold *RESOLUTION ADOPTED AMENDING DELEGATION AGREEMENT WITH MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Motion made by Member Kelly and seconded by Member Faust introducing the following resolution and moving its approval: RESOLUTION AMENDING DELEGATION AGREEMENT WITH MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH WHEREAS, the City of Edina has a Delegation Agreement with the Minnesota Department of Health to perform Food, Beverage and Lodging establishment inspections, and WHEREAS, the City of Edina has adopted the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules 4626.0010 to 4626.1870, and WHEREAS, the Minnesota Food Code, Rules 4626.0010 to 4626.1870 will become effective January 1, 2000. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Edina hereby agrees to amend the Delegation Agreement between the Minnesota Department of Health and the City of Edina dated August 1, 1987, by referencing Minnesota Rules 4626.0010 to 4626.1870 in this amendment and to enforce same Rules within the City of Edina. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to execute any necessary amendment to the August 1, 1987, Delegation Agreement. Dated this 7th day of December, 1999. Attest: Debra A. Mangen Dennis F. Maetzold Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. Page 14 Minutes/Edina City Council/December 7,1999 *YEAR 2000 COUNCIL MEETING DATES AND HOLIDAYS APPROVED Motion made by Member Kelly and seconded by Member Faust approving the year 2000 Council meeting dates and holiday schedule. - Motion carried on rollcall vote -four ayes. *RESOLUTION ADOPTED APPROVING AGREEMENT FOR PARTICIPATION IN FEDERAL AID PRESERVATION PROGRAM FOR RED SIGNAL BULB REPLACEMENTS AND SIGNAL PAINTING Motion made by Member Kelly and seconded by Member Faust approving the following resolution: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF AGREEMENT FOR PARTICIPATION IN FEDERAL AID PRESERVATION PROGRAM WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, (the "City ") as follows: Section 1. Recitals. Hennepin County (the "County") has prepared an agreement between the City and County to participate in the LED Replacement and Signal Painting project, City of Edina Improvement No. TS -29. The County will administer and inspect the performance of the contracts. Section 2. Approvals. The form of the Agreement is hereby approved, and the Mayor and City Manager are authorized to enter into the Agreement on behalf of the City in substantially the form presented to the City with such changes or modifications thereto as do not change the substance of the Agreement and are approved by the Mayor and City Manager, such approval to be conclusively presumed by the execution and, delivery of the Agreement by the Mayor and City Manager. Dated this Th day of December, 1999. Attest: Debra A. Mangen Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. Dennis F. Maetzold *2000 PUBLIC HEALTH NURSING SERVICE CONTRACT AWARDED Motion made by Member Kelly and seconded by Member Faust awarding the contract. for Public Health Nursing Services to the Bloomington Division of Public Health for $162,005.00 for 2000. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *RESOLUTION ADOPTED APPROVING PUBLIC AUCTION OF TAX FORFEIT PROPERTY Motion made by Member Kelly and seconded by Member Faust approving the following resolution: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina has received from the County of Hennepin a list of lands in said municipality which became the property of the State of Minnesota for non - payment of property taxes, which said list was dated October 13, 1999, Conservation/Non- Conservation Classification List 1106 -C/NC. WHEREAS, the parcels in said list identified as PIN No. 18- 028 -24 -42 -0030 (5007 Bruce Avenue) and as PIN NO. 29- 028 -24 -22 -0026 (Outlot 1, Evans Addition), have heretofore been classified by the Board of County Commissioners of Hennepin County, Minnesota, as non - conservation land the sale thereof and has heretofore been authorized by said Board of County Commissioners; and Page 15 Minutes/Edina City Council/December 7,1999 WHEREAS, it has been determined by the Edina City Council that there is one existing special assessment against the parcel identified as PIN No. 18- 028 -24 -42 -0030, (5007 Bruce Avenue) in the amount of $320.65 for delinquent utility bills on said parcel, and the parcel identified as PIN NO. 29- 028 -24 -22 -0026, ( Outlot 1, Evans Addition), has no pending or levied special assessments against it; and WHEREAS, it has been determined by the Edina City Council that the parcel identified as PIN No. 18- 028 -24 -42 -0030, (5007 Bruce Avenue) need not be withheld from sale pursuant to M.S. 85.012, M.S. 92.461; M.S. 282.01, Subd. 8; M.S. 282.018, Subd. 1, or M.S. 282.018, Subd. 2; and WHEREAS, it is the intent of the City of `Edina to acquire the tax forfeited property parcel identified as PIN No. 29- 028 -24 -22 -0026, Outlot 1, Evans Addition for use as public right -of -way. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Edina City Council that the said classifications are hereby approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Edina City Council as follows: 1. that, acting pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 282.01, Subd. 7a, it has determined that said parcel 018 - 028 -42 -0030 (5007 Bruce Avenue) shall be offered for public sale according to statute. 2. that that the City Clerk be authorized and directed to file, "Application . of Governmental Subdivision for Conveyance of Tax Forfeited Lands," for the following described property contained in Hennepin County Conservation/Non- Conservation Classification List 1106 N/NC, said property to be used by the City as hereafter set forth: Outlot 1, Evan Addition (PIN No. 29- 028- 24 -22- 0026), Public Right -of -Way. Adopted this 7th day of December, 1999. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *LETTER OF INTENT APPROVED WITH MINNEHAHA WATERSHED DISTRICT BOARD, PAMELA PARK PROTECT Motion made. by Member Kelly and seconded by Member. Faust approving a Letter of Intent with the Minnehaha Watershed District Board of Directors for the Pamela Park Project. . Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *RESOLUTION ADOPTED ELECTING TO CONTINUE PARTICIPATION IN THE LOCAL HOUSING INCENTIVE PROGRAM - METROPOLITAN LIVABLE COMMUNITIES FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2000 Motion made by Member Kelly and seconded by Member Faust introducing the following resolution and moving its approval: RESOLUTION ELECTING TO CONTINUE PARTICIPATING IN THE LOCAL HOUSING INCENTIVES ACCOUNT PROGRAM UNDER THE METROPOLITAN LIVABLE COMMUNITIES ACT CALENDAR YEAR 2000 WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act (Minnesota Statutes Section 473.25 to 473.254) establishes a Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund which is intended to address housing and other development issues facing the metropolitan area defined by Minnesota_ Statutes Section 473.121; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Livable Communities fund, comprising the Tax Base Revitalization Account, the Livable Communities Demonstration Account and the Local Housing Incentive Account, is intended to provide certain funding and other assistance to metropolitan area municipalities; and WHEREAS, a metropolitan area municipality is not eligible to receive grants or loans under the Metropolitan Livable Communities fund or eligible to receive certain polluted sites cleanup funding from the Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic Development unless the Page 16 Minutes/Edina City Council/December 7,1999 municipality is participating in the Local Housing Incentives Account Program under the Minnesota Statutes section 473.254; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act requires the Metropolitan Council to negotiate with each municipality to establish affordable and life -cycle housing goals for the municipality that are consistent with and promote the policies of the Metropolitan Council as provided in the adopted Metropolitan Development Guide; and WHEREAS, each municipality must identify to the Metropolitan Council the actions the municipality plans to take to meet the established housing goals through preparation of the Housing Action Plan; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council adopted, by resolution after a public hearing, negotiated affordable and life -cycle housing goals for each participating municipality; and WHEREAS, a metropolitan area municipality which elects to participate in the Local Housing Incentives Account Program must do so by November 15 of each year, and WHEREAS, for calendar year 2000, a metropolitan area municipality that participated in the Local Housing Incentive Account Program during the calendar year 1999, can continue to participate under Minnesota Statutes section 473.254 if; (a) the municipality elects to participate in the Local Housing Incentives Account Program by November 15, 1999; and (b) the Metropolitan Council and the municipality have successfully negotiated affordable and life -cycle housing goals for the municipality: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City of Edina hereby elects to participate in the Local Housing Incentives Program under the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act during the calendar year 2000. Passed this 7th day of December, 1999. Attest: Debra A. Mangen Dennis F. Maetzold Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *BRAEMAR ARENA ADVERTISING/EDINA HOUSING ASSOCIATION PROPOSAL APPROVED Motion made by Member Kelly and seconded by Member Faust approving the Edina Hockey Association advertising proposal for the period December 1, 1999, through November 30, 2000. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *PETITION RECEIVED REQUESTING STREET LIGHT INSTALLATION AT 5001 OAK BEND LANE Motion made by Member Kelly and seconded by Member Faust acknowledging receipt of a petition from residents at 5000, 5001, 5004 and 5008 Oak Bend Lane, requesting installation of street lighting at 5001 Oak Bend Lane, and forwarding the petit, ion to the Engineering Department for processing as to feasibility. Motion carried on rollcall vote -four ayes. CONCERN OF RESIDENT EXPRESSED Kathleen Godfrey, stated she was concerned about the City's use of Tax Increment Financing in Edina. Ms. Godfrey asked when all the debt would be retired and whether or not a portion of the money intended for use in the Grandview TIF district was coming from other areas. Ms. Godfrey also questioned if an early retirement of the 50th and France or the Centennial Lakes TIF debt were possible. She questioned the HRA's authority to be involved in redevelopment projects and the types of projects allowed under statutes. Mr. Hughes replied that Edina's TIF Districts will expire between 2009 and 2013. When the districts expire all their debt will have been paid. He added that the Grandview Area Tax Increment District is a stand alone district and cannot be pooled with any other district in the City. Mr. Hughes added that a TIF District may be Page 17 Minutes/Edina City Council/December 7,1999 paid off early if sufficient funds within the district exist to pay the principal. Mayor Maetzold explained that during the life of a TIF District the City gets the entire "increment ", as opposed to 14% of each tax dollar. Mr. Hughes and Attorney Gilligan explained briefly how projects qualify for inclusion as . "public "projects" eligible for use of TIF Funds. 2000 FEES; INCLUDING PUBLIC HEARING ON LIQUOR FEES REVIEWED PLAN Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Finance Director Wallin presented the proposed fees and charges set by City Ordinance for 2000. He noted that the fees were increased approximately 3 %o as discussed during the budget assumption process. It was noted that before raising fees charged for liquor licenses as proposed for 2000, existing licensees were given a thirty-day mailed notice of the hearing and the proposed increases. Mayor Maetzold called for public comment. No one appeared to speak. Mayor Maetzold closed the hearing. RESOLUTION APPROVED FOR 2000 PARK AND RECREATION FEES AS AMENDED Member Kelly made a motion, seconded by Member. Hovland, introducing the following resolution and moving its adoption. The Council stopped and briefly discussed the fees charged at Braemar. Concern was expressed by Council Members that Braemar was not charging adequately for green fees. Park Director Keprios pointed out that previous Council had intentionally kept green fees low to encourage use of Braemar. He noted the Park Board's recommendation. Council consensus was to increase the green fee for 18 holes non patrons to $30.00 and the green fee for 9 holes non - patrons to $18.00. Member Kelly amended his original motion incorporating the agreed upon increases for Braemar Green Fees. Member Faust seconded the motion. RESOLUTION SETTING 2000 PARK AND RECREATION FEES BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council does hereby approve and set the following 2000 Park and Recreation Fees. PARK AND RECREATION PLAYGROUND $13.00 COACH PITCH N/A ADULT TENNIS INSTRUCTION $37.00 YOUTH TENNIS INSTRUCTION $37.00 PEE WEE TENNIS $26.00 TEAM TENNIS $63.00 TENNIS CAMP $79.00 YOUTH SUMMER CLASSIC TENNIS TOURNAMENT $13.00 ADULT SUMMER CLASSIC TENNIS TOURNAMENT $16.00 ADULT ATHLETIC FEES SUMMER SOFTBALL SOFTBALL POST SEASON TOURNEY.. Co -Rec & Mens Classic $360.00 Team Entry Fee $55.00 League Mens/Womens 35 & Over & Industrial League Non - Resident Fee (Individual) Non - Resident Fee (Team) FALL SOFTBALL $325.00 BASKETBALL $26.00 5 -Man C League $425.00 $155.00 5 -Man B League $425.00 HOCKEY Page 18 Minutes/Edina City Council/December 7,1999 Co -Rec Leagues $235.00 4 -Man League $225.00 .hens Leagues $210.00 BROOMBALL Non - Resident Fee $25.00 Co -Rec League $300.00 (Individual) $5.00/hr 1' /2 hours Non - Resident Fee (Team) $150.00 BANDY VOLLEYBALL A- Division $120.00/h Officiated Leagues $235.00 B- Division $120.00/h Non - Officiated Leagues $130.00 C- Division $120.00/h Non - Resident (Individual) $10.00 $5.00/hr 5 hours AQUATIC CENTER 8 hours $6.00/hr SEASON TICKETS $35/$32 RESIDENT FAMILY: $6.50/hr 2000 First 2 members 4 hours *65.00/$75.00. Each additional member $43/$39 $25.00 Maximum (8 members). $225.00 RESIDENT INDIVIDUAL: *40.00/$50.00 NON - RESIDENT FAMILY: 2000 First 2 members $80.00/$90.00 Each addition al member $30.00 Maximum (8 members) $270.00 NON - RESIDENT INDIVIDUAL $50.00/$60.00 Daily Admission $7.00 Admission after 6 P.M. $5.00 Aquatic Instruction $60.00 * Early Bird Special if purchased no later than May 1, 2000. ART CENTER MEMBERSHIPS: FAMILY - $35.00 INDIVIDUAL - $25.00 CLASS FEES * (based on # of hours in class) PARENT /CHILD WORKSHOPS* Open skating (Youth and Adult) (Members -10% discount) (includes 1 child and 1 adult) . $1.50 NON- MEMBERS NON- MEMBER/MEMBER 25 hours $5.00/hr 1' /2 hours $16/$14 24 hours $5.00/hr 2 hours $18/$16 21 hours $5.00/hr 3 hours $22/$20 14 hours $5.00/hr 4 hours $28/$26 12 hours $5.00/hr 5 hours $32/$29 . 8 hours $6.00/hr 6 hours $35/$32 5 hours $6.50/hr 7 hours $40/$36 4 hours $7.00/hr 8 hours $43/$39 *all clay and children's classes add $5.00 *all clay classes add $5.00 ARENA Hourly Rate (as of 9/95) $130.00 Open skating (Youth and Adult) $3.00 Skate Rental $1.50 Skate Sharpening $3.00 SEASON TICKETS (set first week of September) RESIDENT FAMILY: First 2 members $70.00 Page 19 Minutes/Edina City Council/December 7,1999 Each additional member Maximum (7 persons) RESIDENT INDIVIDUAL: NON - RESIDENT FAMILY: First 2 members Each additional member Maximum (7 persons) NON - RESIDENT INDIVIDUAL CLASSES . BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE GREEN FEES 18 hole - non - patron 18 hole - patron . 9 hole - non - patron 9 hole - patron GROUP FEES -18 holes GROUP FEES - 9 holes PATRON CARDS (until April 1) Individual Executive Course PATRON CARDS (after April 1) Individual Executive Course COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS Resident Non - Resident LOCKERS Men's 72 inch Men's 42 inch Ladies 72 inch CLUB STORAGE CLUB RENTAL PULL CARTS GOLF CARS 18 holes 9 holes 18 holes /person with disability /sgl rider Group Car Fees GROUP GOLF LESSONS Adult junior BRAEMAR ROOM Resident - wedding related Non- residents - wedding related Other events $5.00 $95.00 $60.00 $85.00 $5.00 $110.00 $70.00 $79.00 $30.00. $21.00 $18.00 $12.00 $40.00 $20.00 $60.00. $25.00 $65.00 $25.00 $20.00 $24.00 $35.00 $25.00 $15.00 $35.00 $8.00 $2.50 $24.00 $14.00 $14.00 $32.00 $78.00 $36.00 $675.00 $750.00 $275-$750 Concession Fees (an annual increase of 5 %, as a general rule) BRAEMAR EXECUTIVE COURSE Page 20 Minutes/Edina City Council/December 7,1999 GREEN FEES Adult non - patron $10.00 Adult patron $8.50 Junior - non - patron $7.50 Junior - patron $6.50 Golf Cars (everyone) $11.00 Pull Carts $2.00 Group Fees $13.00 DRIVING RANGE Each Additional Member Large Bucket $6.00 Small Bucket $4.00 Warm -Up Bucket $2•?5 $1.00 FRED RICHARDS GOLF COURSE GREEN FEES Locker Rental Adult - non - patron $10.50 Adult - patron $9.00 Junior - non- patron $7.50 Junior. - patron, $6.50 Golf Cars (everyone) $11.00 Pull Carts $2.00 Group Fees $13.00 GOLF DOME Large Bucket $6.25 Senior Bucket $6.00 Time Golf 1/2 hour $8.75 Hourly Field Rental $110.00 League $700.00 Page 21 EDINBOROUGH PARK Daily Passes $4.00 SEASON PASSES Edina Family (first 2 members) N/A Each Additional Member $25.00 Maximum (7 members) $280.00 Edina Individual $200.00 Non -Edina Family (first 2 members) N/A Each Additional Member $30.00 Maximum (7 Members) $330.00 Non -Edina Individual $230.00 Towel Fee $1.00 Skate Rental $1.50 Locker Rental $0.25 BUILDING RENTALS Com'1 Use/Trade Shows $2,500.00 Banners $150.00 Use of Rink $125.00 Area EXCLUSIVE RENTAL Cover Ice $400.00 Area Friday Evening $1,600.00 Domestic Photo Shoot (hourly) Page 21 Minutes/Edina City Council/December 7,1999 Saturday Evening $1,600.00 Any Park $50.00 Area Blocked Paddle Boats Off Prom $2,200.00 Grotto $75.00 NON - EXCLUSIVE RENTALS: (per hour) Theatre $75.00 $600.00 Ice Skates Great Hall $ 75.00 Great Hall $300.00 Ice Rink $100.00 Theater $125.00 Commercial Photo Shoot (hourly) Grotto $75.00 Any Park $ 200.00 Area Blocked Lawn Games Off $75.00/hr Ice Rink $100.00 Grotto $ 200.00 Pool (swim team only) $14.00 Theatre . $ 200.00 (Residents Only) Great Hall $ 300.00 $35.00 Per field/day includes Ice Rink $ 300.00 CENTENNIAL LAKES Rental Concession Items Weekend Rental - Full Evening (6 PM -1AM) Paddle Boats 4 person boat 1/2 hr $ 5.00 Friday evening $600.00 Winter sled per hr $ 3.00 Saturday evening $600.00 Ice Skates $1.50 Champion Putting BUILDING RENTALS 9 hole $4.00 .1 /2 day - Salon $100.00 18 hole $7.00 Full day - Salon $200.00 Amphitheater Rental Lawn Games Amphitheater Rental $75.00/hr Per Court $8.00 PARK DEPARTMENT RENTALS General Park Areas: Van ValkenburWCourtney Fields (Residents Only) Resident Use/hour $35.00 Per field/day includes $150.00 building Resident Use /day $105.00 Edina Athletic Associations Commercial.Use (i.e. $65.00 Field User fee /participant $7.00 TV)/hour Commercial use with light/hour Picnic shelter /day Cornelia Showmobile /day Athletic Fields - Residents Only: Per field - per day Per field - per hour Per field - per hour (with lights) Arneson Acres Terrace Room: Per day /w /formal gardens /gazebo $115.00 p Edina Hockey Association Outdoor Hockey Rink $105.00 Field User fee /participant $7.00 $700.00 Park Shelter Buildings (half -day) Weber Park $25.00 $105.00 Cornelia School Park $25.00 $35.00 Todd Park $25.00 $55.00 Walnut Ridge Park $25.00 Park Shelter Buildings (full -day) $130.00 Weber Park $50.00 . Page 99 Per hour, first hour Each additional hour up to 4 hours Rosland Park Pathway: N/A N/A Per hour Per day Minutes/Edina City Council/December 7,1999 $ 50.00 Cornelia School Park $ 25.00 Todd Park $50.00 $200.00 Walnut Ridge Park PEGGY KELLY MEDIA ARTS STUDIOS $50.00 $50.00 $50.00 DO -IT YOURSELF EQUIPMENT SERVICES HOURLY RENTAL 2 DAY FEE RENTAL Transfer movies to video $12.00 35mm Slide $15.00 Projector Pictures or slides to $12.00 .Dual Slide $30.00 video (album) Projector w/Dissolve Unit Audio Dubbing or $12.00 VHS Camcorder $25.00 Transfer VHS Video Editing $10.00 Overhead new $20.00 Projector old $10.00 35mm Photo Copies $7.00 Opaque $20.00 Projector 35mm Slide Copies $7.00 16mm Movie $25.00 Projector VHS Video Copies $4.00 Super 8mm $16.00 (up to 3 at one time) Projector with sound Foreign Conversion $7.00 8mm Movie $11.00 (PAL, SECAM) Projector Laminator/Heat Press $5.00 Lowell Light Kit $20.00 Audio Cassette Dupl. $1.00/ Wireless Mike $20.00 copy Kit Customer provides blank cassettes (video and audio), film and lamination supplies. PHOTO/VIDEO STUDIO RENTAL Studio - not staffed - Introductory pricing $30.00/hour (includes 2 Canon XL1 digital mini -DV video. cameras, digital editor, and digital mixer) (props and expendables not included) COMPUTER OPEN STUDIO TIME Macintosh G3 or Compaq 266 Mhz PC $8.00/hr. (includes use of Adobe Photoshop, PageMaker and non- members pay Illustrator software with Epson Color Stylus an add'1$10.00 daily printing - prints purchased separately) " access fee MEMBERSHIP All equipment or facility rentals requires a membership. One day /one visit pass - $10.00. $10.00 Annual Individual Membership (12 months) $25.00 Annual Family Membership (12 months) $35.00 Adopted this 7f day of December, 1999. Rollcall: Page 23 Minutes/Edina City Council/December 7,1999 Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold Motion carried. RESOLUTION APPROVED FOR 2000 AMBULANCE FEES Member Kelly made a motion to approve and adopt the following resolution: RESOLUTION SETTING AMBULANCE FEES FOR 2000 BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council does hereby approve and set the following ambulance service fees for 2000. AMBULANCE FEES Service Level Fees for Ambulance Service, including medical treatment and/or transportation to a medical facility: Level 1- ON SCENE TREATMENT .$210.00 Specialized medical services performed at scene with no transport involved Level 2 - MINOR CARE (BLS) $465.00 Vital Signs Splinting Bandaging, etc. Level III - MODERATE CARE (ALS) $570.00 IV, Nitrous, Nitro Spray, ASA EKG Monitoring Spine Immobilization Level IV - MAJOR CARE $660.00 Medications MAST (inflated) Cardiac Pacing Airway Management Level V - RESPIRATORY /CARDIAC ARREST $800.00 Level IV plus any: Cardio/Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) Defibrillation OXYGEN ADMINISTRATION $33.00 MILEAGE FROM SCENE TO HOSPITAL $9.00 /mile ADDITIONAL MANPOWER OR MECHANICAL $300.00 EXTRICATION Member Hovland seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold Motion carried. RESOLUTION APPROVED FOR 2000 MISCELLANEOUS FEES Member Kelly made a motion to approve and adopt the following resolution: RESOLUTION SETTING MISCELLANEOUS FEES FOR 2000 BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council does hereby approve and set the following miscellaneous fees for 2000: HAZARDOUS MATERIALS Page 24 Minutes/Edina City Council/December 7,1999 SPILLS RESPONSE Engine/Fire Company $200.00 per hour HazMat Unit $400.00 per hour Specialized Personnel Limited Response $100.00 per hour Specialized Equipment Cost + 15% administrative charge Supplies Cost + 15% administrative charge Disposal Cost + 151/6 administrative charge Other City Resources Cost + 151/6 administrative charge PLANNING DEPARTMENT Zoning Compliance Letter $100.00 Member Hovland seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold Motion carried. CLAIMS PAID Motion made by Member Kelly approving payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated December 2, 1999, and consisting of 36 pages: General Fund $115,665.31; Communications $12,886.15; Communications $2,250.00; Working Capital $6,015.53; Art. Center $24,217.44; Golf Dome Fund $1,205.41; Swimming Pool Fund $223.44; Golf Course Fund $9,195.27; Ice Arena Fund $3,553.03 Edinborough/Centennial Lakes $20,854.37; Utility Fund $301,519.28; Storm Sewer Utility Fund $14,782.82; Recycling Program $28.00; Liquor Dispensary Fund $331,323.77; Construction Fund $122,245.95; TOTAL $965,965.77; and for confirmation of payment of claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated December 2, 1999, and consisting of 6 pages: General Fund $300,997.63; Working Capital $1,328.90; Art Center $195.00, Golf Course Fund $1,855.57; Utility Fund $196.34; Liquor Dispensary Fund $122,397.99; TOTAL $426,971.43. Faust seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold Motion carried. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Maetzold adjourned the Council Meeting at 10:10 P.M. City Clerk Page 25 MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL ON DECEMBER 6,1999 AT 5:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Kelly, Johnson, and Mayor Maetzold. TRUTH IN TAXATION PUBLIC HEARING HELD FOR PROPOSED 2000 CITY BUDGET Pursuant to published notice given, the Edina City Council conducted a public hearing on the proposed property tax increase in the 2000 Budget for the City of Edina, as mandated by Chapter 375, Laws of Minnesota 1993. Mayor Maetzold stated the purpose of the Truth in Taxation hearing would focus on the proposed 2000 City of Edina Budget. The budget review relates to the monies' source and how they are expended on the various functions and services of the City. Residents with questions relating to the valuation placed on their homes should plan to appear at the Board of Review in April of 2000. City Manager Hughes reviewed the 2000 proposed expenditures of $19,268,154. He explained this would be an increase of $741,320 of approximately 4.0 %. Tax revenues must increase $415,196 or 3.17% from 1999 to support the proposed expenditures. It was noted that the City of Edina receives 14% of the property tax bill, with 46% going to local school, 33% going to Hennepin County and 7% to other taxing entities. Major changes in the 2000 budget were reviewed and the property tax impact un both residential and commercial property discussed. Public Comment Mayor Maetzold asked if any of the three citizens in attendance or Representative Erhardt had comments. No one spoke. Member Johnson made a motion, seconded by Member Kelly to close the hearing and adjourn the meeting at 5:25 p.m. Ayes: Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold Motion carried. City Clerk . f. i� V, o REPORT /RECOMMENDATION N� y To: Mayor & City Council From: Craig Larsen City Planner Date: December 21, 1999 Subject: Preliminary Rezoning and Amendment to the Comprehensive Land Map. Haugland Company, Tracts A&B, RLS 1378. Recommendation: Agenda Item: II. A. - Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ❑ Motion ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion The Planning Commission recommends approval of the proposed Rezoning to Planned Commercial District, PCD -1, and Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan subject to: • Final Rezoning • Widening Lincoln Drive • Dedication of needed right -of -way at corner of Lincoln and Londonderry Drives. Info /Background: See attached Planning Commission minutes from October 27, 1999, and December 1, 1999, staff report, plans and correspondence. Also attached is a revised traffic study by Benshoof and Associates. The original study included Veterans'Day in the base count. The revised study is based on counts taken on December 6, and 7, 1999. CITY OF EDINA Memo To: Craig Larsen, City Planner From: Fran Hoffman, City Engineer L CC: File Date:. December 17, 1999 Re: Traffic Report - Benshoof & Associates for Haugland Company Staff has reviewed the updated traffic report dated December 13, 1999, conducted by Benshoof & Associates. The consultant updated the traffic data collected and reviewed the street layout on Lincoln Drive. After review of the document, staff would concur with the general findings of the consultant. Also, staff has been reviewing the intersection of Lincoln Drive and Londonderry Drive for potential geometric changes to discourage traffic flow into Parkwood Knolls. This may require a small amount of land from the proposed project as part of the intersection improvement. The amount of right -of -way needed might impact some landscaping and signage on the northeast corner of the proposed site. Thus, the Engineering. Department would recommend that the project be approved with two conditions. The first condition would be expansion of Lincoln Drive as recommended by the consultant. The second condition would be dedication of the. additional right -of -way necessary to accomplish the new intersection geometrics at the Londonderry and Lincoln Drive intersections. • Page 1 BENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES, INC. TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS 10417 EXCELSIOR BOULEVARD, SURE TWO / HOPKINS, MN 55343 / (612) 238 -1667 / FAX (612) 238 -1671 December 13, 1999 REFER To Flu=: 99 — 98 MEMORANDUM To: Gene Haugland, Haugland Company From: James A. Benshoo RE: Updated Traffic Review of Proposed Retail Development on Lincoln Drive PURPOSE This memorandum presents the complete results regarding our traffic review of a neighborhood retail development proposed by the Haugland Company to be located in the southwest corner of the Londonderry Road/Lincoln Drive intersection in the City of Edina. As such, this memorandum represents an update and is to replace our earlier memorandum on this project, which was dated November 22, 1999. The three reasons for this complete updated memorandum are to correct a couple of typographical errors, to report on some additional traffic counts, and to address two additional items requested by the City Engineer. BACKGROUND The Haugland Company has proposed to develop a neighborhood retail development of about 9,900 square feet GFA in the southwest corner of the Londonderry Road/Lincoln Drive intersection. The development would have two driveways on Lincoln Drive and no access on Londonderry Road. The centerline of the main driveway would be located on Lincoln Drive about 400 feet south of the centerline of Londonderry Road. The second driveway, which primarily would be for service vehicles, would be located about 175 feet south of the main driveway. No access exists along the east side of Lincoln Drive along this entire frontage. The driveway for the United Health Care facility on the east side of Lincoln Drive is south of the two referenced driveways for the proposed development. Questions have been raised regarding the traffic implications of the proposed development and the ability of Lincoln Drive to accommodate the traffic to and from the development. The purpose of this memorandum is to address the basic traffic effects of the proposed development, with particular attention to the five points listed on the next page: Mr. Gene Haugland 2 December 13, 1999 • Trip generation for your development, as related to the number of new trips that would be generated if the property were developed for general office or medical office. • Increase in traffic on Lincoln Drive due to the proposed development. • Ability of the site driveways to adequately accommodate the development traffic. • Adequacy of the existing northbound left turn lane on Lincoln Drive to serve left turns from the south into the development. • Provisions for pedestrians to cross Lincoln Drive to and from the development. EXISTING CONDITIONS Along most of the site frontage, including the location of the main access, Lincoln Drive provides three traffic lanes. One lane is for southbound traffic, and two lanes are for northbound traffic. The inside northbound traffic lane is intended for left turns. It provides 'a protected left turn lane for motorists turning to the west on Londonderry Road and is available to provide a protected lane for motorists turning left into the main development access from the south on Lincoln Drive. Immediately south of the site, Lincoln Drive is widened to provide a southbound left turn lane into the United Health Care facility. These existing conditions are shown in Figure 1. Traffic movements at the intersection of Londonderry Road and Lincoln Drive are controlled by stop. signs on all four approaches. In order to effectively address the questions about the effects of trips generated by the proposed development on Lincoln Drive, we completed detailed traffic counts on Lincoln Drive south of Londonderry Road. The counts first were conducted on Thursday, November 11 and Friday, November 12, 1999. All vehicle movements were recorded by direction and by hour. Since traffic conditions may not have been completely representative on November 11 because that was Veterans Day, we repeated the counts on Monday, December 6 through Wednesday, December 8. Two tables presenting the complete traffic count results for both count periods are provided at the end of this memorandum. Principal results from these existing traffic counts are: The total average daily two -way volume on the weekdays of December 6 — 8 was 5,444 vehicles. This count is about 12 percent higher than the November count, which included Veterans Day. We are confident that the 5,444 vehicles is a normal weekday volume since December 6 — 8 were typical weekdays and since this volume is just slightly greater than the most recent volume reported by the City of 5,000 vehicles per day. a a 2• A 1 di ammmOUS / I Ig�'y X85.'9 rlV� `t� �. a, I 1 a, LONDONDERRY ROAD n l pI HAUGLAND RETAIL. SITE 1\ r 7 97 95 I I�. /0 1011'0 - . R -JS.I L _ 61.11 � I 1 T Ir, PROPOSED ttl ' r % � .�, ACCESS it _ / DRIVEWAYS 9� N Gpti� v _ l FIGURE 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS ON LINCOLN DRIVE Ib' `, 4 TRAFFIC STUDY FOR J.zw o HAUGLAND DEVELOPMENT tw 44 � °, w DECEMBER 13, 1999 HAUGLAND COMPANY 1 �► 9 / Scale in beef / BENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES, INC. � J TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS 0 JO 60 - 90 . Mr. Gene Haugland 4 . December 13, 1999 • From the December counts, the highest hourly volume in the morning peak period was 647 vehicles. This volume occurred from 7:00 to 8:00 a.m. and consisted of 239 northbound vehicles and 408 southbound vehicles. The counts validate comments made by several residents at the December 1 Planning Commission meeting in that the volumes are noticeably higher in two a.m. hours (7:00 — 9:00 a.m.). _ • From the December counts, the highest hourly volume in the afternoon peak period was 657 vehicles. This volume occurred from 4:00 to 5:00 p.m. and consisted of 284 northbound vehicles and 373 southbound vehicles. As for the a.m. period, the counts validated comments by residents that volumes are distinctly higher for two hours in the afternoon ( 4:00 — 6:00 p.m.). TRIP GENERATION FOR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AS COMPARED TO ALTERNATIVE USES As previously mentioned, the proposed development would consist of about 9, 900 square feet gross floor area (GFA) of retail uses. The uses are intended to provide services, such as coffee/bagel, deli food, and dry cleaning, for nearby.resi dents and employees. If this retail development were not constructed, we understand that two alternative uses for the site would be general office and medical office. For purposes of this memorandum, we have assumed that an alternative general office development would provide 20,000 sq. ft. GFA, and that an alternative medical office development would provide 16,000 sq. ft. GFA. For the proposed development and the two alternative uses, we have projected the number of vehicle trips that would be generated in the a.m. peak hour, p.m. peak hour, and on a daily basis. The results are shown in the table on the next page. B Mr. Gene Haugland 5 December 13, 1999 TRIP GENERATION FOR PROPOSED HAUGLAND RETAIL DEVELOPMENT AND ALTERNATIVE USES Development Scenario /Size Trip Ends (both origins and destinations A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Daily Proposed Retail Development/9,900 s . ft. GFA. Gross trips on driveways 64 60 700 Less pass-by trips now on Lincoln Dr. -19 -18 -210 Less trips diverted from TH 169/Londondery Rd.Bren Rd. Interchange -26 -24 -280 NET NEW TRIPS CAUSED BY DEVELOPMENT 19 18 210 Alternative Office Develop ment/20,000 s . ft. GFA Gross trips on driveways 52 52 386 NET NEW TRIPS CAUSED BY DEVELOPMENT 52 52 386 Alternative Medical Office Development/16,000 sq. ft. GFA Gross trips on driveways 39 1 56 438 NET NEW TRIPS CAUSED BY DEVELOPMENT 39 56 438 "Trip Generation, 6t' Edition," Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1997, and experiences by Benshoof & Associates, Inc. Though the number of trips on the site driveways would be greatest with the proposed development, the above table indicates that the proposed development would add the fewest new trips. As indicated in the table, the two reasons why the proposed development would cause the least increase in net new trips are: a) 30 percent of the development trips would be pass -by trips that presently are on Lincoln Drive. Three examples of this type of trip are: Motorist leaving his /her home on Lincoln Drive south of the site who would stop at the development to purchase a cup of coffee and a bagel while enroute to his /her workplace using the TH 1691Londonderry Road interchange.. Mr. Gene Haugland 6 December 13, 1999 Motorist returning to his /her home on Lincoln Drive south of the site from the TH 169/Londonderry Road interchange who would stop to pick up a drycleaning order. Motorist traveling to work at the United Health Care facility on Lincoln Drive who would stop at the development to purchase some deli food for lunch. b) 40 percent.of the development trips would be trips that presently do not use Lincoln Drive but operate through the TH 169/Londonderry Road interchange. An example is a motorist who works in the Opus development, who presently exits from TH 169 at Londonderry Road, and who in the future would include a stop at the development to purchase a cup of coffee and a bagel while enroute to work. Experience has shown that neither general office development nor medical office development have any significant trip reductions due to pass -by or diverted trips. Thus, all the trips generated by these two alternative developments are expected to be new trips added to the nearby roadways. EXTENT TO WHICH DEVELOPMENT WOULD INCREASE VOLUMES ON LINCOLN DRIVE This section addresses the extent to which the proposed development would increase the volumes on Lincoln Drive. Using the trip generation projections presented in the previous table and expectations regarding the directional distribution and routing patterns for new trips, pass -by trips, and diverted trips, we have projected the total volume increase that the development would cause on Lincoln Drive. The results are presented in the following table, both for the segment north of the main driveway (to Londonderry Road) and the segment south of the main driveway. TRAFFIC VOLUME INCREASES ON LINCOLN DRIVE DUE TO PROPOSED RETAIL DEVELOPMENT North of Main Driveway South of Main Driveway A.M. Peak Hour Existing Volume 647 647 Increase Due to Development 39 5 Percent Increase 6.0% 0.8% P.M. Peak Hour Existing Volume 657 657 Increase Due to Development 36 6 Percent Increase 5.5% 0.9% Mr. Gene Haugland 7 December .13, 1999 Two principal results shown in the table on the previous page are: a) The volume increase on Lincoln Drive between the main site driveway and Londonderry Road would be 39 vehicles in the a.m. peak hour and 36 vehicles in the p.m. peak hour. This increase, which constitutes just over one vehicle every two minutes, represents a small increase over the existing volumes. b) The volume increase on Lincoln Drive south of the main site access is expected to be very small, just five and six vehicles in the a.m. and p.m. peak hours, respectively. ABILITY OF MAIN SITE DRIVEWAY TO ACCOMMODATE ENTERING AND. EXITING TRAFFIC The next step was to assess the ability of the main site driveway to accommodate the trips into and out of the site. A capacity analysis was performed for the intersection of Lincoln Drive and the main site access using standard procedures. This analysis was performed using the counts on December 6 — 8 since those were typical weekdays. The capacity analysis measures the level of service for movements through the intersection in terms of the amount of delay that motorists would experience. Levels of service are graded from A to F. Very little delay is experienced under level of service A, whereas level of service F represents a situation in which motorists experience very extensive delay. Most agencies in the Minneapolis /St. Paul area consider that level of service D is maximum acceptable threshold for planning and design purposes. For both the a.m. and p.m. peak hours, the capacity analysis revealed that vehicles exiting from the development (both left and right turns) would operate at level of service B and left turns into the development would operate at level of service A. ADEQUACY OF NORTHBOUND LEFT TURN TRAFFIC LANE ON LINCOLN DRIVE TO SERVE DEVELOPMENT Figure 1 shows that a northbound left turn lane presently exists at the main site access drive on Lincoln Drive. In our judgment, however, the current striping on Lincoln Drive, including this left turn lane, is not fully adequate to accommodate the future traffic volumes for the following two reasons: a) The lane provides "stacking" space for only two vehicles waiting to turn left into the site. Mr. Gene Haugland 8 December 13, 1999 b) The southbound left turn lane in the United Health Care facility is only about 50 feet, which is quite short ccnsidering the volume of these left .turns in the peak periods. To resolve these limitations, we have prepared the recommended plan shown in Figure 2. As shown, this plan would involve widening the west side of Lincoln Drive by four feet along about 310 feet on the southerly portion of the property. With this widening, a left turn lane would be provided along the full length of Lincoln Drive between Londonderry Road and the driveway to the United Health Care facility. Figure 2 shows our initial suggested striping plan. As shown, the plan would provide the following lefft turn lanes: a) Northbound left turn lane for the main access that would extend the full distance between the two site driveways (about 175 centerline spacing). b) Northbound left turn lane for the secondary, south access of about 30 feet. The left turn volume entering at this location is expected to be very low. c) Southbound left turn lane for the United health Care facility that would be about double the current length (100 feet instead of the existing 50 feet). City Engineering staff could adjust the transition between the northbound and southbound left turn lanes (altering the lengths of the lanes in points b) and c) above) prior to construction, or City staff could make such adjustments in the future if needed based on operating experiences. PROVISIONS FOR PEDESTRIANS TO CROSS LINCOLN DRIVE TO AND FROM THE DEVELOPMENT A sidewalk presently exists on the east side of Lincoln Drive. Upon completion of the development, we expect that a significant number of persons will walk between the development and homes in the neighborhood and between the development and the United Health Care facility. To safely accommodate these pedestrian movements, we suggest the following improvements: a) Establish a pedestrian crosswalk with normal markings and signing across Lincoln Drive on the south side of the main site driveway. We suggest that the crosswalk be on the south side of the main driveway because this will enable a direct connection to the building entrances and because fewer traffic conflicts will exist at this location, as compared to the north side of the driveway. b) Extend the sidewalk, along the front of the development to the crosswalk recommended in point a). Y ?. A 1 SL O - 82.22' 9' R _ 35.00) —L— 50.42( 909.00 903.90 N m h i �m r � � T C� l A ! I' r / BIT,JWMOU$ LONDONDERRY ROAD I f 3 l HAUGLAND RETAIL I SITE j FIGURE 2 PROPOSED PLAN FOR . LINCOLN DRIVE TRAFFIC STUDY FOR W 4cwp Q� HAUGLAND DEVELOPMENT 0 DECEMBER 13, 1999 f O�� HAUGLAND COMPANY r few WRANSPORTATION BENSHOOF & AS SOCIATES, INC. 0o 90 ENOINEERSANDPLANNERS s84•54'12'E \' 42.77 I � / R — 35.00 / L 61.x1 1 / 111 Mr. Gene Haugland 10 December 13, 1999 c) Extend the sidewalk along the front of the United Health Care facility to join the sidewalk on the east side of Lincoln Drive at the crosswalk location referenced in point a). CONCLUSIONS The five overall conclusions that we have established from this traffic review of your proposed commercial development on Lincoln Drive are: • The proposed development would generate fewer net new trips in the a.m. and p.m. peak hours than would occur if the property developed with either general office or medical office uses. • The volume on Lincoln Drive between the main access for the development and Londonderry Road would increase by just 39 vehicles in the a.m. peak hour and 36 vehicles in the p.m. peak hour due to the proposed development. • During both the a.m. and p.m. peak hours, the main site access on Lincoln Drive would accommodate entering traffic at level of service A and exiting traffic at level of service B. • The recommended four foot widening on the west side of Lincoln Drive will provide a consistent width along the full distance between Londonderry Road and the United Health Care driveway, will effectively accommodate northbound left turns into the proposed development, and will improve safety for southbound left turns into the United Health Care facility, • The recommended pedestrian improvements will safely accommodate pedestrians walking to and from the development. Based on the above findings, we are confident that the vehicle trips to and from the proposed development will not cause any adverse impacts on nearby roadways, and that pedestrian movements will be safely accommodated. EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES ON LINCOLN DRIVE SOUTH OF LONDONDERRY ROAD Benshoof & Associates, Inc. November 22, 1999 Thursday -Nov 11, 1999 Friday - Nov 12, 1999 Daily Average Time of Day Northbound Southbound Northbound Southbound Northbound Southbound Total 12 - 1 AM - - - -- 5 7 5 7 12 1 -2 1 2 1 2 3 2 -3 5 3 5 3 8 3 -4 1 2 1 2 3 4 -5 1 2 1 2 3 5 - 6 .13 25 13 25 38 6-7 64 115 64 115 179 7 -8 245 282 245 282 527 8 -9 215 280 215 280 495 9 -10 111 124 111 124 235 10 -11 105 85 105 85 190 11 -12 224 95 224 95 319 12 - 1 PM 171 162 178 183 174 173 347 1 -2 121 129 138 137 129 133 262 2 -3 109 104 90 65 99 85 184 3 - 4 172 131 172 131 303 4 -5 350 320 350 320 670 5 -6 291 234 291 234 525 6-7 134 121 134 121 255 7 - 8 56 37 56 37 93 8 - 9 38 44 38 44 82 9-10 27 32 27 32 59 10-11 16 10 16 10 26 11-12 6 12 6 12 18 TOTAL 1,490 1,337 1,396 1,407 2,482 2,353 4,835 Benshoof & Associates, Inc. November 22, 1999 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES ON LINCOLN DRIVE SOUTH OF LONDONDERRY ROAD Benshoof & ' -sociates, Inc. December 8, 1999 Monday - Dec 6, 1999 Tuesday - Dec 7, 1999 Wednesday - Dec 8, 1999. Daily Average Time of Day Northbound Southbound Northbound Southbound Northbound Southbound Northbound Southbound Total 12 -1AM 5 4 4 7 5 6 11 1 -2 1 7 3 3 2 5 7 2 -3 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 3 -4 2 2 1 1 2 2 4 4 -5 5 5 1 4 3 5 8 5 - 6 15 18 16 20 16 19 35 6 -7 51 131 64 151 58 141 199 7 -8 228 442 249 373 239 408 647 879 214 382 226 384 220 383 603 9 -10 101 148 124 131 113 140 253 10 -11 121 94. 121 91 121 93 214 11 -12 180 128 192 146 186 137 323 12 - 1 PM 155 242 171 228 134 221 153 230 383 1 -2- 122 163 140 191 143 152 135 169 304 2 -3 113 98 .122 133. 128 129 121 120 241. 3 -4 195 160 186 163 191 162 353 4 -5 289 363 279 383 284 373 657 5 - 6 241 356 287 341 264 349 613 6 -7 160 145 149 114 155 130 285 7 - 8 57 47 62 57 60 52 112 8 - 9 35 39 37 46 36 43 79 9-10 32 31 29 37 31 34 65 10-11 12 14 15 17 14 16 30 11 -12 7 14 9 4 8 9 17 TOTAL 1,418 1,672 2,410 3,075 1,406 1,813 2,418 3,026 52444 Benshoof & ' -sociates, Inc. December 8, 1999 DRAFT P.C. MINUTES,. DECEMBER 1, 1999 Z -99 -1 Haugland Company 5850 Opus Parkway, Suite 108 Request: Amend Comprehensive Plat map from single family to commercial. Preliminary rezoning from R -1 to commercial Location: Tracts A and B, Registered Land Survey No 1378 Hennepin County, Minnesota Mr. Larsen reminded the Commission the proposed rezoning was heard and continued at the October 27, 1999, Planning Commission meeting. The proponents were requested to supply further information regarding traffic impact of the development compared to other possible uses. The proponent, Mr. Gene Haugland was present. Mr. Jim Benshoof, traffic engineer was also present. Mr. Haugland introduced himself to the Commission, and introduced Jim Benshoof, of Benshoof & Associates, Inc. to address traffic. Mr. Benshoof told the Commission at their recommendation a traffic analysis was prepared for the proposed retail development on Lincoln Drive. Mr. Haugland informed. the Commission Haugland Company is requesting to develop a 9,900 square foot retail mall in the southwest corner of Londonderry Road /Lincoln Drive. The development is designed with two driveways on Lincoln Drive and no access on Londonderry Road. With graphics Mr. Benshoof pointed out the access points and asked the Commission to note the driveway access for the proposed development is off -set from the entrance into United Health Care. Mr. Benshoof said his purpose is to address the basic traffic effects of the proposed development. Commissioner Ingwalson noted in reviewing the trip generation chart he noticed traffic counts were taken on November 11" and 12th. He pointed out that was a holiday and questioned if the count was a fair representation. Mr. Benshoof said he believes the counts taken on those days represent normal traffic flow. Continuing, Mr. Benshoof explained the total daily two -way volume was 4,835 vehicles. He pointed out this count is close to the 5,000.count recorded by the City. Continuing, Mr. Benshoof said the highest volume in the morning peak period was 527 vehicles. The highest hour volume in the afternoon peak period was 670 vehicles. Commissioner Swenson questioned the access points on the site and asked if traffic would flow better if it was a one way situation throughout the site. Mr. Benshoof responded that he did not believe that would be of benefit. He said Lincoln Drive at this point can be developed into three traffic lanes which would be a benefit. Commissioner Lonsbury asked Mr. Benshoof to explain to the Commission how traffic reports are compiled. Mr. Benshoof explained vehicle counts are taken over a period of time and projections are made based on information gathered from "Trip Generation, 6" Edition, " Institute of Transportation Engineers, 1997, and experiences by Benshoof & Associates, Inc. Commissioner Lonsbury asked Mr. Benshoof how confident he feels his report is. Is he 99% confident or 80% confident. Mr. Benshoof said traffic analysis does not work on percentages, adding he is confident the counts reflect what is occurring along Lincoln Drive. Commissioner Ingwalson asked Mr. Hoffman if he agrees with the traffic analysis presented by Mr. Benshoof. Mr. Hoffman responded that he looked at how the traffic analysis was conducted, and agrees with the outcome. He said every couple seasons the City has a traffic count compiled in this area. Mr. Hoffman said as he understands. it the issue before the Commission is what would generate the least amount of traffic, retail or office. Commissioner Runyan asked Mr. Hoffman if he feels Lincoln Drive is wide enough to accommodate three 1anes. Mr. Hoffman responded in his opinion three usable lanes can be developed in this area. Continuing, Mr. Hoffman said he would recommend three lanes as a condition of the developers agreement. Commissioner McClelland pointed out if a vehicle exits United Health Care to travel north, then stops at the convenience mall the vehicle would block the lane, and access area. Mr. Hoffman said that scenario would be avoided with three lane striping. Commissioner McClelland commented if one were to accept the figures on page 3 of the traffic report that only 39 new trips would be generated in the A.M., and 56 in the P.M. she would question why anyone would what to construct a retail center with so few new.trips. Commissioner McClelland said Lincoln Drive and the area of Parkwood Knolls is already overburdened with traffic, and in her opinion this proposal just adds to the congestion. Chairman Johnson asked Mr. Larsen if he believes the building sizes, of 20,000 square feet for office, 16,000 square feet for medical office and 9, 800 square feet for retail are a realistic comparison for this site. Mr. Larsen responded in the affirmative. Chairman Johnson opened the floor to the audience. Mr. Moyle, 5736 Tucker Lane, said in his opinion the real problem is not Lincoln Drive but Londonderry Drive. He explained navigating along this stretch of road is tedious. Continuing, Mr. Moyle commented that all office uses in the area are adequately screened with berms and vegetation, but the proposed retail mall will be out in the open, very conspicuous. Concluding, Mr. Moyle said he feels that an office building is more consistent with the neighborhood. Mr. Anderson, 6925 Langford Drive, told the Commission he may be the only one present that favors the rezoning. He added he is looking forward to added conveniences in the area and suggested that the information the Commission has been receiving may be skewed. He said he has spoken with a number of people in his development that support the proposal. Commissioner McClelland asked Mr. Anderson how many units are located in the Manor Home development. Mr. Anderson said he believes there are 140 individual units. Ms. Kay Ireland, 5700 Parkwood Lane; told members of the Commission traffic is very bad in Parkwood Knolls. She said it does not bother her to have to go to Jerry's for her shopping needs. Marcella Mosow, 6877 Langford Lane, asked the Commission about the pollution that will be generated as a result of this development. She pointed out there is a clean air act that needs to be followed. Mr. Larsen responded a proposal of this size does not trigger.pollution review. Mr. McDougal, 6829 Langford Drive, told the Commission there are many walkers in the area, and in his opinion it is dangerous to cross Lincoln Drive. He explained an MTC bus services Lincoln Drive, and the bus stops traffic when picking up passengers at different points along Lincoln Drive. Mr. Hoffman said when United Health Care requested using this piece of land for parking during a campus construction phase the City had the same concerns. The City worried about workers crossing Lincoln Drive to get to the United Health Care campus and then back to their cars. Mr. Hoffman commented staff was surprised at how smoothly the workers crossed Lincoln Drive, and during that period of time no problems occurred. Commissioner Swenson asked Mr. McDougal where the MTC bus stops are located. Mr. McDougal responded the bus stops at the entrance to the Manor Homes, and at other points along Lincoln Drive Mr. Bill Rose, Habitat Court, asked the Commission if the choice the Commission has is a yes or no vote. He asked if the City can refuse the request to develop this site. Chairman Johnson pointed out the land is privately owned. He added what is before the Commission this evening is staff's recommendation that a neighborhood retail mall is the best land use for this site. Mr. Robert Martin, 6983 Langford Drive, told the Commission every office building he is familiar with offers coffee to their employees, questioning why a freestanding retail coffee /restaurant is needed. Mr. Vick Ryans, 6920 Lincoln Drive, stated in his opinion drivers today are very discourteous, and they race down Lincoln Drive at top speed. He pointed out traffic in this area is already heavy and dangerous and this proposal will add to it. Mr. Karl Kaufman, 5709 Duncan Lane, told members of the Commission it is not unusual for vehicles to use the entrance into Londonderry Townhomes as a turn around to avoid ramp metering. Mr. Kaufman said he would like the Commission to consider the total area when reviewing this proposal, and if approved stipulate that Lincoln Drive needs to be widened before development can occur. Mr. Hoffman interjected in his opinion that should be a condition of approval. Commissioner Swenson asked Mr. Hoffman if there is a sidewalk in the area. Mr. Hoffman said there is a sidewalk on one side of Lincoln Drive. Mr. Crolick, 5609 Parkwood Road, said the Parkwood Knolls neighborhood is already over - stressed with traffic, and noise pollution. Mr. Crolick suggested leaving the zoning exactly as it is zoned, R -1. Commissioner Swenson asked Mr. Larsen to explain the R -1 zoning classification. Mr. Larsen explained the City views the R -1 zoning district as single family detached or an open vacant undeveloped piece of land. A resident of 6892 Langford Drive told the Commission his issue is pedestrian travel. He explained he walks his dog three times per day, and walks along Lincoln Drive. He told the Commission if they approve this proposal they will be adding more traffic to an already dangerous congested traffic situation. Donna Schoffelman, 6964 Langford Court, told the Commission she has a concern about weekend use of the proposed mall. She said she is not sure there will be enough traffic on the weekends to sustain the mall, adding she worries about the buildings becoming vacant. Commissioner Lonsbury asked Mr. Larsen to clarify the zoning of R -1, and the City's obligation for development. Mr. Larsen explained the R -1 zoning district is the zoning district for single dwelling units. It is also a designation used as a "holding" zone for undeveloped private land. The City can either allow development of this land, or the City can purchase it. In most instances with undeveloped land the City considers what is a reasonable use of the land. Mr. Lonsbury asked Mr. Larsen if a residential development would be an option. Mr. Larsen said constructing a residential home on this site would be unrealistic. Commissioner Lonsbury said as he understands it, the "City " to the best of its ability is to determine what is the most reasonable use of the land. Mr. Larsen responded that is correct. Commissioner Swenson asked Mr. Larsen who owns the subject property. Mr. Larsen told the Commission United Health Care owns the property, and believes Haugland Company entered into a purchase agreement with United. Commissioner Swenson questioned what would happen if the State wanted to purchase this portion of land to widen 169. Mr. Hoffman responded that he does not believe the State has any intention of buying private land, adding he will contact the State regarding this parcel. Chairman Johnson suggested to Mr. Hoffman that he contact the State and inquiry if they have interest in acquiring this piece of land. Commissioner Bergman asked Mr. Larsen how reasonable it is to construct a one story office building on this site. Mr. Larsen said the size of this site could accommodate a 20,000 square foot office building under the City's Zoning Ordinance. Commissioner Bergman asked Mr. Larsen to explain the different commercial zoning districts. Mr. Larsen explained there are four, different zoning districts in Edina, PCD -1,2,3 & 4. A PCD -1 zoning, (which is the recommended zoning for this site) is a zoning district that serves the neighborhood,, it is a less intense retail use. The PCD -2, zoning district is a commercial zoning that serves the community. The PCD -3, zoning district is zoned for regional use. (i.e., Southdale, Galleria) Concluding, Mr. Larsen said the last zoning district, PCD -4, is a district zoned for gas stations, and car repair shops. .Commissioner Runyan asked Mr. Haugland if he knows the tenant mix of the proposed retail shops. Mr. Haugland said at this time he believes there will be a coffee house, deli and dry cleaners. Mr. Haugland added he would like to pursue a convenience store for the fourth space. Commissioner McClelland asked Mr. Larsen if there is anything in the PCD -1 zoning district that would prohibit the construction of a McDonalds. Mr. Larsen said the PCD -1 zoning district does not allow a drive - through window, but a McDonalds restaurant without a drive - through window, and with adequate parking to accommodate restaurant seating could be constructed. Commissioner Swenson moved to recommend preliminary rezoning approval, R -1 to PCD -1, amendment to the comprehensive plan map and subject to final rezoning and City Engineer approval of road width on Lincoln Drive. Commissioner Lonsbury seconded the motion. Commissioner McClelland stated she will vote against this proposal. She added she worries about pedestrian traffic; Vernon and Gleason Avenues, mall lighting, and the possibility that the proposed mall may attract teenagers after hours. Commissioner McClelland concluded in her opinion if anything is developed on this site it should be a small office building similar to other low profile office buildings located on Lincoln Drive. Chairman Johnson called for the vote. Ayes; Lonsbury, Swenson, Byron, Runyan, Ingwalson, Bergman, Johnson. Nay, McClelland. Motion carried,. 7-1. .# .4 LOCATION MAP N®® -® Will Cc -: _ ' NOT _ •�I -•j ' LOw00M0 [RR� ♦ J. l� IDl7E ` O DRIVE 'y\ ' D OVR E D' Z .� O N®® -® Will N®® -® REZONING NUMBER Z -99 -1 LOCATION Londonderry Road and Hwy 169 REQUEST Rezoning from R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to PCD-2, Planned Residence ` District. EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT ' NOT ' LOw00M0 [RR� ♦ LOIbQ,/p way [ l� IDl7E ` DRIVE 'y\ RK• <' - ids •• �� ..\ 2 J •� f ice.• .♦ i . • u - LANGFORD O'Q � iV -._ E aPEL MILL: LANGFOR1) CT. FOUNTAINW00D _. ..., Al IONAL REZONING NUMBER Z -99 -1 LOCATION Londonderry Road and Hwy 169 REQUEST Rezoning from R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District to PCD-2, Planned Residence ` District. EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT 'i [-DINA PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 27, 1999 STAFF REPORT.. Z -99 -1 Haugland Company 5850 Opus Parkway, Suite 108 Request: Amend Comprehensive Plan map from single family to commercial. Rezoning from R -1 to Commercial Location: Tracts A and B, Registered Land Survey No 1378 Hennepin County Minnesota The subject property is located in the southeast quadrant of Trunk Highway 169 and Londonderry Road. The property is vacant and zoned R -1, Single Dwelling District. The_. proponents request that the site be designated as Commercial and be rezoned to PCD -2, to allow development of a small retail strip center. The site currently is treated as.part of the right of way, and carries a designation of Single Family Residential. Staff has researched the history of this site, and it appears the property has been ignored by Comprehensive Planning and zoning. The parcel was originally part of the property to the east, which is now United Health Care. The property was developed in the mid 1960's as an office /industrial facility. Part of the property was acquired by the County for the construction of highway 169. After construction the unused property was re- acquired by the owners of the United Health Care site. No development proposals have ever been reviewed for the property. It appears that the site may have originally been zoned Industrial along with the balance of the site. However, sometime during or after the highway construction the site ceased to exist from the standpoint of zoning or Comprehensive Planning. The zoning and Comprehensive Plan maps appear to treat the property as part of the interchange right of way. If the site had not been ignored it. probably would have been designated Industrial The proposal before the Planning Commission would designate the . property Commercial and cause a rezoning to PCD -2, Planned Commercial District. PCD -2 is the zoning district used for most of 50th and France and Grandview. 4 W The site contains a lot area of 1.75 acres. The proposed building would contain a Gross Floor Area of 9,800 square feet. Parking for 67 cars would be provided. A commercial building of this size requires 61 parking spaces. The plan meets or exceeds the minimum building setback of 35 feet, and provides the required 20 foot setback for parking. The proposed plan requires no variances. The curbs cuts have been reviewed by the City Engineer and given preliminary approval. RECOMMENDATION There is no convenient place in northwestern Edina to buy any convenience goods or services. The site is in a small industrial park and near a freeway interchange. The proposed site may be best suited to the type of.use proposed. Other possible uses of the property, such as office or industrial, would only add additional peak hour trips to this already congested. area. The proposed use would serve the tenants and residents of the area without contributing significant additional peak hour trips. Although a rezoning to PCD -2 is requested, staff believes PCD -1, Neighborhood Commercial, would be more appropriate. Further, staff does not believe this rezoning would lead to more requests for commercial zoning in the area. This is the only vacant site in the area, and other developed sites do not easily lend themselves to conversion to retail use. Staff recommends approval of the proposed amendment to the Comprehensive Plan, and recommends approval of preliminary rezoning to PCD-1 conditioned on: 1. Final Rezoning MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING �. OF THE EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 27, 1 °99 7:30 F.M., CITY HAIL COUNCIL CHAMBERS MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair, Gordon Johnson, John Lonsbury, David Byron, Ann Swenson, Helen McClelland and Lorelei Bergman MEMBERS ABSENT: Charles Ingwalson, David Runyan and Geof Workinger I. APPROVAL OF"THE MINUTES: Commissioner McClelland moved approval of the minutes of the September 29, 1999, meeting minutes.` Commissioner Lonsbury seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. II. NEW BUSINESS: Agenda items taken out of order. LD -99 -3 Dan Biersdorf 5040 Juanita Avenue 5044 Juanita Avenue Ms. Aaker informed the..Commission the proposed lot division involves two developed lots on Juanita Avenue. The common lot line between the two lots runs diagonally from the northwest to the southeast. The proposal would adjust the line to run east -west, perpendicular to Juanita Avenue. Both lots would continue to conform to zoning ordinance requirements after the trade. Ms. Aaker concluded staff recommends approval. Commissioner Swenson moved to recommend lot division approval. Commissioner Lonsbury seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Z -99 -1 Haugland Company 5850 Opus Parkway, Suite 108 Request: Amend Cemprehensive Plan map from single family to commercial. Rezoning from R -1 to Commercial Location: Tracts A and B, Registered Land Survey No 1378 Hennepin County Minnesota Ms. Aaker informed the Commission the subject property is located in the southeast quadrant of Trunk Highway 169 and Londonderry Road. The property is vacant and zoned R-1, Single Dwelling District. The proponents request that the site be designated as Commercial and be rezoned to PCD -2, to allow development of a small retail strip center. The site currently is treated as part of the right of way, and carries a designation, of Single Family Residential. Ms. Aaker explained staff has researched the history of this site, and it appears the property has been ignored by Comprehensive Planning and zoning. The parcel was originally part of the property to the east, which is now United Health Care. The property was developed in the mid 1960's as an office /industrial facility. Part of the property was acquired by the County for the construction of highway 169. After construction the unused property was re- acquired by the owners of the United Health Care site. No development proposals have ever been reviewed for the property. It appears that the site may have originally been zoned Industrial along with the balance of the site. However, sometime during or after the highway. construction the site ceased to exist from the standpoint of zoning or Comprehensive Planning. The zoning and Comprehensive Plan maps appear to treat the property as part of the interchange right of way. If the site had not been ignored it probably would have been designated Industrial. Ms. Aaker told the Commission the proposal before the Planning Commission would designate the property Commercial and cause a rezoningy to PCD -2, Planned. Commercial District. PCD -2 is the zoning district used for most of 50t and France and Grandview. Ms. Aaker concluded there is no convenient place in northwestern Edina to buy any convenience goods or services. The site is in a small industrial park and near a freeway interchange. The proposed site may be best suited to the type of use proposed. Other possible uses of the property, such as office or industrial, would only add additional peak hour trips to this already congested area. The proposed use would serve the tenants. and residents of the area without contributing significant additional peak hour trips. Although a rezoning to PCD -2 is requested, staff believes PCD -1, Neighborhood Commercial, would be more appropriate. Further, staff does not believe this rezoning would lead to more. requests for commercial zoning in the area. This is the only vacant site in the area, and other developed sites do not easily lend themselves to conversion to retail use. Staff recommends approval of the proposed amendment to the Comprehensive Plan, and recommends approval of preliminary rezoning to PCD -1 conditioned on: 1. Final Rezoning 2 f-, S The proponent, Mr. Gene Haugland was present to respond to questions from the { Commission. Mr. Benshoof of Benshoof and Associates was present representing Mr. Haug!and. Interested neighbors were present. Mr. Haugland introduced himself informing the Commission he believes the proposed rezoning and construction of a retail center will serve members of the neighborhood, and will be of benefit to the City of Edina. Continuing, Mr. Haugland said the proposed shopping area will be a high quality center, and may contain a coffee shop, dry cleaner, and other convenience amenities. Mr. Haugland said the development team desires a PCD -2 zoning, which would allow a drive -up bank and other retail uses. Mr. Haugland added if the Commission disagrees with the request for a PCD -2 zoning, a zoning to PCD -1 would be doable. Commissioner McClelland noted Mr. Haugland referred to the possibility of adding a dry cleaner to the proposed retail space, and asked Mr. Haugland if the proposed dry cleaner would be a drop off facility or a processing facility with chemicals. Mr. Haugland responded the proposed dry cleaner will not have processing. Commissioner McClelland asked Mr. Haugland if he would be comfortable with that added to the motion if this were to be approved. Mr. Haugland said he would be. comfortable with that recommendation. Mr. Dick Johnson, 5700 Tucker Lane, explained to the Commission the history of the area asking the Commission to note when this area was first developed no' retail, use was indicated in the Comprehensive Land Use plan. Continuing, Mr. Johnson explained traffic flow in this area is around 5,000 cars per day, and the neighboring property owners don't need more traffic. Mr. Johnson told the Commission he would like more time to study the proposed plan. He added he would like to have input from a traffic engineer that would speak to trip generations. Concluding Mr. Johnson said he believes the impacted neighbors did not have adequate time to respond properly, and requested that the Commission continue this item to allow members of the neighborhood time to get together and outline a response. Mr. Fred Mauck, 6104 Habitat Court, urged the Commission to require that a traffic study be done on this site. Mr. Mauck noted in the staff presentation staff indicated the use as proposed should not create more peak traffic trips, and that vehicles will use the proposed retail center at all times of the day. Mr. Mauck noted Mr. Haugland said a coffee shop or dry cleaner may be constructed, but no firm commitments have been entered into. Mr. Mauck said he has a concern that occupancy by a McDonalds or Burger King may occur. Concluding, Mr. Mauck said he is very concerned, and believes this is an opportunistic situation. He added in his opinion there is no need for retail use in this area, and this is a prime example of spot zoning at its worst. Mr. Mauck said he is very opposed to this type of development in this area. Chairman Johnson asked Mr. Mauck if he believes traffic will come from 169 to use the proposed retail center, and how that traffic will impact you where you live. Mr. Mauck pointed out everyone in the area uses the intersection at 169, and any additional traffic is too much traffic. Continuing, Mr. Mauck said the visual impact of a 3 small retail mail located next to residential is not compatible. Concluding, Mr. Mauck reiterated in his opinion this is not an appropriate use, and the impact of traffic as a result of this development will spread to all areas. Mr. Mauck stressed the area is predominately residential, and asked the Commission to note that United Health Care is a campus situation with large setbacks. This mall will be constructed right on top of residential properties, with reduced setbacks. Bennett Moyle, president of Londonderry Town Homes told the Commission the Londonderry townhome development is the closest residential development in the area, and he is very concerned with the development as proposed. Mr. Moyle stated residents of Londonderry have not had enough time to study or respond to this proposal. Mr. Moyle asked the Commission to slow the process down so members of the townhome development can provide a proper response. Mr. Moyle stated that for the most part residents of Londonderry have a traffic concern. He stressed this is a residential neighborhood with foot traffic, and there is no intersection or cross walk in this area. Concluding, Mr. Moyle pointed out many residents walk, and additional, traffic would be dangerous. Mr. Moyle reiterated he believes residents of Londonderry. did not have adequate time to review the proposal, the sign is the only thing that alerted them of this proposal, and he requested that this item. be slowed down, and tabled. Chairman Johnson asked Ms. Aaker when the rezoning signs went up. Ms. Aaker said she believes the signs went up 10 days ago. Mr. Moyle said the signs were put up one week ago. Chairman Johnson asked Mr. Haugland when the signs went up. Mr. Haugland said 10 days ago.. Members. of the audience indicated they did not agree that the signs went up 10 days ago. Caroline Peterson, resident of the Manor Homes on Langford Lane, told the Commission her complex is 144 units, and in her opinion residents did not have enough time to respond adequately to the proposal. Ms. Peterson told the Commission her development is already bothered by traffic and noise, adding at this time she is not sure how the proposed development will impact her property. Ms. Peterson said she agrees with the previous speaker that there are walkers in this neighborhood, and she has a concern if more cars are added to the road safety would become an issue. Chairman Johnson referred to Ms. Aaker, and asked her if she found any information in the file on when the signs were .erected. Ms..Aaker said City staff received a fax indicating the sign was posted on October 18, 1999. There was some discussion from the Commission if the sign was erected a full 10 days before the meeting as directed by Ordnance. Chairman Johnson asked Commissioner Byron to review the language of the Ordinance. Mr. George Bunkie, 6085 Lincoln Drive, told the Commission he has not spoken with anyone who supports the proposed rezoning. He said. in his opinion the area is already saturated with traffic, and a retail shopping mall will only add to the traffic. Mr. Michael Oren, 6115 Lincoln Drive, told the Commission he has lived in the area for 24 years, and it is a wonderful residential neighborhood to live in. He ad. ded during the 0 1 past 24 years he has seen traffic increase, and now it is impossible to get in or out of his property during the peak hours. Commissioner Byron interjected and told Chairman Johnson he has reviewed the Ordinance and read for the Commission from the Ordinance "until the sign has been erected as required and for at least ten days preceding the hearing." Commissioner Byron added that wording can be debated between attorneys on exactly what the word preceding includes or does not include. Continuing, Commissioner Byron said what is also important is that the Ordinance also reads "The failure of any petitioner to comply fully with the provisions of this paragraph relating to the sign shall not prevent the Commission and Council from acting on the petition nor invalidate any rezoning granted by the Council." Commissioner Byron said if one considers that statement the Commission can legally hear the petition. Chairman Johnson said he believes the Commission should move forward and hear the petition. The Commission may decide at the end of the hearing to table the request. Mr. Gene Kreiger, 6115 Lincoln Drive, asked if there will be 'a stop sign on Lincoln Drive. Chairman Johnson said he believes there will be a stop sign exiting the retail site, but no stop sign or stop light on Lincoln Drive. Mr. Haugland explained the property does not go as far as the property line of United Health Care, adding there are two points of egress, and the points of egress resulted from working in cooperation with the City Engineer. With graphics Mr. Haugland pointed out the egress points. Chairman Johnson said Mr. Hoffman, City Engineer is not present this evening to help clarify traffic questions. Mr. Larry Moso, 6877 Langford Drive, asked the Commission to note the audience this evening is made up of mostly seniors, and as seniors we enjoy walking through our neighborhoods. The addition of a retail shopping mall will add to the already, congested area, and will compromise our safety. Mr. Mike Mitchell, 6848 Langford Drive, said he does not believe a retail store is needed for this part of Edina. He pointed out Jerry's is not far away, and there is a strip mall on Shady Oak Road where residents of this area can purchase convenience items. Mr. Bill Rose, 6119 Habitat Court, said the issue for him is traffic. He told the Commission vehicles travel as fast as 50 mph down Lincoln Drive which creates a safety hazard. Mr. Rose suggested that the City erect a stop sign at the entrance to Habitat Court. Mr. Rose suggested tabling the issue until certain traffic issues can be addressed, and residents of the neighborhood can speak to each other about this. Chairman Johnson said residents of Habitat Court can approach the traffic safety committee and request a sign. Harold Catco, Edina West, told the Commission he moved into the area two years ago, and found himself astounded at the traffic. He said the pedestrian safety of the residents of the area are a real concern. He pointed out United Health Care continually 5 1i. grows, adding even more traffic. He said he believes this area is as bad as Jerry's parking t , lot at high noon. He asked the Commission to please table this issue allowing further s study. Mr. Conrad Retzel, 5717 Duncan Lane, told the Commission if United Health Care wants to provide their employees with amenities they should develop these amenities on their campus. Mr. Arthur Park. 6904 Langford Drive, said he has a worry if the property is rezoned that a service station.would be constructed. Chairman Johnson explained a service station requires a different zoning designation. If a service station is requested another public hearing would be required. Mr. John Albinson,.5737 Duncan Lane, told the Commission he may be the only one present this evening that supports the project. He said he believes a PCD -1 zoning would be better than an office zoning. The PCD -1 zoning would spread traffic throughout the day while construction of a new office building would add to the peak traffic flow. Mr. Albinson asked staff what is allowed in the PCD -1 zoning district. He concluded he enjoys the idea that tie can walk in his neighborhood to fulfill some of his convenience needs. He stated this development is pedestrian friendly, and a positive approach. Ms. Aaker explained the PCD -1 zone allows offices, including both.business and. professional. Ms. Aaker read for the Commission and audience the allowed uses in the PCD zoning districts. Commissioner Swenson asked Ms. Aaker if, a recent traffic study was done. Ms. Aaker explained a traffic study was done on this area in the recent past with the results of the study implemented in the Comprehensive Plan. Ms. Sue Fee, 5720 Londonderry. Drive, asked the Commission how long the rezoning process could take. Chairman Johnson responded a rezoning is required to go before the Commission and Council two times. Ms: Fee.asked the Commission if there is a time limit.before a developer can request a new zoning for the site. Maybe PCD -1, to PCD -4. Chairman Johnson said there is no time limit on a request. Chairman Johnson reiterated if this area were to be rezoned again a public hearing would be held. Ms. Donna Linker, 6115 Lincoln Drive, invited the Commission to sit on her driveway at 4:00 p.m. and watch the traffic. Commissioner Bergman asked Mr. Haugland who he is targeting when he considered this project. Mr. Haugland responded the market indicated retail. or a small office would be market friendly targets for residents and. employees of the area. The development team opted for the commercial rezoning.. Mr. Haugland said he believes the proposed retail mall will capture vehicles already present in the area. Mr. Haugland said he has letters of intent from retail businesses that support the proposed request to rezone the site to commercial He concluded he has retained Mr. Benshoof of Benshoof and Associates to do a traffic analysis. 0 Mr. Jim Benshoof, told the Commission there are a few points he would like to make. He pointed out the size of the mall development is 9,800 square feet which is not a large retail development, but rather on the small scale. The size of the complex affects traffic. Mr. Benshoof said the principal traffic using the site will be generated from persons already in the area traveling to and from their homes or business. Mr. Benshoof said the traffic patterns generated will be less intense during peak business hours versus office use. Mr. Benshoof pointed out traffic control at the intersection to the north is an all way stop sign which helps reduce speed. He pointed out the width of Lincoln drive at the main access to the proposed retail mall is three traffic lanes, which would serve left turns into the development. Concluding, Mr. Benshoof reiterated that in his opinion the proposed. use reduces peak trip generations into the area. Chairman Johnson said he believes the retail site will also contribute to peak hour, counts into. the site. Mr. Benshoof agreed, but noted a majority of the trips to the.proposed mall are existing trips, not new trip generations into the area. Mr. Carl Kaufman, 5709 Duncan Lane, told the Commission there is already a traffic problem in the area. He said the four way stop does not work well. He said vehicles are always turning around .on the bridge into the Londonderry townhomes because of the traffic. Mr. Kaufman said traffic really needs to be addressed in this area on the whole. Chairman Johnson suggested that. a traffic study should be done. Chairman Johnson said at this time the Commission is only speculating on the traffic. Commissioner McClelland said she believes the Commission has collected as much information this evening as possible. She said she would like to go back and review the traffic figures in the Comprehensive Plan and hear from the City Engineer regarding traffic. Concluding, Commissioner McClelland said she has grave concerns regarding traffic. Commissioner McClelland moved to continue this item until the December 1, 1999, Planning Commission hearing, requesting that Fran Hoffman, City Engineer be present, and have Mr. Hoffman conduct traffic counts on Lincoln Drive. Commissioner Swenson seconded the motion. Commissioner Byron said he can support the motion to table this issue. He added hopefully the extra time will help.the Commission make an educated decision. Continuing, Commissioner Byron said he is concerned with traffic, and is frustrated because much of the traffic concerns come from the US Highway Department, and the County. He pointed out the City has limited ability to deal with ramp signals, etc. Concluding, Commissioner Byron said the Commission does not have the luxury of saying nothing can be developed on this site, it is privately owned, but the Commission wants to make an educated decision with as much information as possible supplied by the Planning and Engineering staff. Commissioner Byron commented the Commission may find after all, the information is gathered that a PCD -1 zoning is the best zoning for the site. All voted aye; motion.carried. III. ADJOURNMENT: 7 The meeting was adjourned at 9:15 p.m. 0001, -V kie Hoogenakker 0 I Memorandum To: Planning Commission From: Craig Larsen Date: November 24, 1999 Re: Haugland rezoning request The proposed rezoning was heard and continued by the Commission at their October 27, meeting. The commission requested further information regarding the traffic impact of the development compared to other possible uses. :.::.:..... Attached is a traffic study prepared by Benshoof & Associates which compares the . _.._........ proposed retail use to general office use and medical office. Also attached is a memorandum from Fran Hoffman addressing the impact of the development. Refer to: Traffic study, letter from City Engineer, letter from United Health Care, and correspondence from neighborhood. ti Memo To: Craig Larsen, City Planner From: Francis Hoffman, City Engineer, Date: November 23, 1999 Re: Neighborhood Retail Development at Londonderry & Lincoln Drive Staff has reviewed the traffic report submitted by Benshoof & Associates, Inc., prepared for the proposed development. In general, staff concurs with the findings in the report. The existing conditions at the interchange are not good. However, the level of service on the collector roadway, Lincoln Drive, is acceptable. The current congested areas are the on ramps at Londonderry interchange and the Vernon /. Gleason intersection to the east end of this collector road segment. Currently, the City is reviewing this and the Parkwood Knolls area traffic. It is expected that a traffic signal will be proposed at Vernon / Gleason to facilitate traffic flow at that intersection which will provide some change in southern Parkwood Knolls. The purpose of providing this information is to provide a more global view of this proposed project. Staff expects that some of the current traffic flow to the Grandview Area (Jerry's, etc.) will not go there if some service provisions are made near the neighborhood. This could possibly help balance traffic flows. The only downside would be attracting OPUS users in Minnetonka to drive over to Lincoln Drive which would be new traffic on the short segment of Lincoln Drive between Londonderry and the new driveways. Overall, staff does not feel this proposal is detrimental to the area Y i November 24, 1999 Manor Homes of Edina Residents: The City of Edina is considering allowing a strip mall to be built on the corner of Lincoln Dr. and Londonderry on the vacant piece of land that was once used as a temporary parking lot for United Health Group. If you are in opposition to a strip mall being built in that location; please sign this petition., If you are interested in more information, please call the City of Edina Planning Dept. at 826 -0369. It is very important that we have a significant turnout of people at the city council planning commission on: December 1, 1999 at 7:30 pm at the Edina City Hall. NAME ADDRESS rn \ 1� November 24, 1999 Manor Homes of Edina Residents: The City of Edina is considering allowing a strip mall to be built . on the corner of Lincoln Dr. and Londonderry on the vacant piece of land that was once used as a temporary parking lot for United Health Group. If you are in opposition to a strip mall being built m that location, please sign this ,petition: If you are interested in more information, please call the City of Edina Planning Dept. at 826 - 0369. It is very important that we have a significant turnout of people at the city council planning commission on: December 1, .1999 at 7 :30 pit: at.the Edina City. Hall:ry NAME ADDRESS '1 V It r November 24, 1999 Manor Homes of Edina Residents: The City of Edina is considering allowing a strip mall to be built on the corner of Lincoln Dr. and Londonderry on the vacant piece of land that was once used as a temporary parking lot for United Health Group. if'. ou:'are :in opposition to a strip mall being built in that location; please' sign'this petition. If you are interested in more information, please call the City of Edina Planning Dept. at 826 -0369. It is very important that we have a significant turnout of people at the city council planning commission on: December; I, 1999. at. 7:30 pm at the Edina City Hall. NAME ADDRESS Ir i ,J 9 November 24, 1999 Manor Homes of Edina Residents: The City of Edina is considering allowing a strip mall to be built on the corner of Lincoln Dr. and Londonderry on the vacant piece of land that was once used as a temporary parking lot for United Health Group. If you are in opposition .to a strip mall being built in that location,; please sign this petition. y If you are interested in more information, please call the City of Edina Planning Dept. at 826 -0369. It is very important that we have a significant turnout of people ac the city council planning commission on: December, , l 1999 at 7 :30 m at ,the ;Edina City Hall: NAME ADDRESS r,4 6'i o.1, ywi'� �Al V ��y/ / i.. L_ LL. f -. _ (L I� I • November 24, 1999 Manor Homes of Edina Residents: The City of Edina is considering allowing a strip mall to be built on the corner of Lincoln Dr. and Londonderry on the vacant piece of land that was once used as a temporary parking lot for United Health Group. If you are in opposition to a strip mall being built in that location, please sign this petition.;, If you are interested in more information, please call the City of Edina Planning Dept. at 826 -0369. It is very important that we have a significant turnout of people at the city council planning commission on: December 1, 1999 at 7:30 pm at the Edina City Hall. NAME ADDRESS *"told - )'uL4 J 19 ui`// Galgofa -d Ot r November 24, 1999 Manor Homes of Edina Residents: The City of Edina is considering allowing a strip mall to be built on the corner of Lincoln Dr. and Londonderry on the vacant piece of land that was once used as a temporary parking lot for United Health Group. If you are in opposition to a strip mall being built in that location, IC / please sign this petition! If you are interested in more information, please call the City of Edina Planning Dept. at 826 -0369. It is very important that we have a significant turnout of people at the city council planning commission on: December 1, 1999 at 7:30 pm at the Edina City Hall. NAME RES)S.�u�Y�r�� b, 4 November 24, 1999 Manor Homes of Edina Residents: The City of Edina is considering allowing a strip mall to be built on the corner of Lincoln Dr. and Londonderry on the vacant piece of land that was once used as a temporary parking lot for United Health Group. If you are in opposition to a strip mall being built in that location; please sign his petition;{ If you are interested in more information, please call the City of Edina Planning Dept. at 826 -0369. It is very important that we have a significant turnout of people at the city council planning commission on: December 1; 1999 at 7:30 pm at the Edina City Hall:' NAME ADDRESS T r.:3 `7 cl / Q %1 N c !f i✓ a J R N 6 fd0 November 24, 1999 Manor Homes of Edina Residents: The City of Edina is considering allowing a strip mall to be built on the corner of Lincoln Dr. and Londonderry on the vacant piece of land that was once used as a temporary parking lot for United Health Group. If you are in opposition to a strip mall being built in that location; please sign this petition., If you are interested in more information, please call the City of Edina Planning Dept. at 826 -0369. It is very important that we have a significant turnout of people at the city council planning commission on: December 1, 1999 at 7:30 pm at the Edina City Hall. NAME ADDRESS Q s � I i1 November 24, 1999 Manor Homes of Edina Residents: The City of Edina is considering allowing a strip mall to be built on the corner of Lincoln Dr. and Londonderry on the vacant piece of land that was once used as a temporary parking lot for United Health Group. hf you are in opposition. to a strip mall being built in that.. location; please: sign this° °petition:; If you are interested in more information, please call the City of Edina Planning Dept. at 826 -0369. It is very important that we have a significant turnout of people at the city council planning commission on: December ';1, 1999 at 7:3.0 "pm at the Edina City Hall. NAME ADDRESS November 24, 1999 Manor Homes of Edina Residents: The City of Edina is considering allowing a strip mall to be built on the corner of Lincoln Dr. and Londonderry on. the vacant piece of land that was once used as a temporary parking lot for United Health Group. Lf you. are, in opposition to ,,a strip mall being built in that location- please; sign this, petition If you are interested in more information, please call the City of Edina Planning Dept. at 826 -0369. It is very important that we have a significant turnout of people at the city council planning commission on: December .'1; 1,999 at 7.:30 . pm at: the._Edina.City Hall: NAME ADDRESS Wil ,i November 24, 1999 Manor Homes of Edina Residents: The City of Edina is considering allowing a strip mall to be built on the corner of Lincoln Dr. and Londonderry on the vacant piece of land that was once used as a temporary parking lot for United Health Group. If you are in opposition to a strip mall being built in that location, please sign this petition. If you are interested in more information, please call the City of Edina Planning Dept. at 826 -0369. It is very important that we have a significant turnout of people at the city council planning commission on: December 1, 1999 at 7:30 pm at the Edina City Hall. NAME ADDRESS 6�75 F��q November 24, 1999 Manor Homes of Edina Residents: The City of Edina is considering allowing a strip mall to be built on the corner of Lincoln Dr. and Londonderry on the vacant piece of land that was once used as a temporary parking lot for United Health Group. If you;;are in opposition.to a'stri' mall_being built in that location; please sigo,this' °.pet iion' , If you are interested in more information, please call the City of Edina Planning Dept. at 826 -0369. It is very important that we have a significant turnout of people at the city council planning commission on: December., l 1999- at;730 m'at the Edina City Hall: NAME ADDRESS 1k November 24, 1999 Manor Homes of Edina Residents: The City of Edina is considering allowing a strip mall to be built on the corner of Lincoln Dr. and Londonderry on the vacant piece of land that was once used as a temporary parking lot for United Health Group. If you are in opposition to a strip mall being built in that location; please sign this petition. If you are interested in more information, please call the City of Edina Planning Dept. at 826 -0369. It is very important that we have a significant turnout of people at the city council planning commission on: December 1, 1999 at 7:30 pm at the Edina City Hall.,. NAME °; ADDRESS ti j i_, d.-7 0 ` J November 24, 1999 Manor Homes of Edina Residents: The City of Edina is considering allowing a strip mall to be built on the corner of Lincoln Dr. and Londonderry on the vacant piece of land that was once used as a temporary parking lot for United Health Group. If you are in opposition to a strip mall being built in that location, please sign-this petition. If you are interested in more information, please call the City of Edina Planning Dept. at 826 -0369. It is very important that we have a significant turnout of people at the city council planning commission on: December 1, 1999 at 7:30 pm at the Edina City Hall.. NAME ADDRESS 1 �R November 24, 1999 Manor Homes of Edina Residents The City of Edina is considering allowing a strip mall to be built on the corner of Lincoln Dr: and Londonderry on the vacant piece of land that was once used as a temporary parking lot for United Health Group. If you are ml.opposition.to a strip mall being built in that location; please sign this `;petition. If you are interested in more information, please call the City of Edina Planning Dept. at 826 -0369. It is very important that we have a significant turnout of people at the city council planning commission on: Dec ember`.1 1999 at 7130 pm at the, Edina City HaIL NAME ADDRESS AA, J, C r AA -4-41i4QT-Z� A November 24, 1999 Manor Homes of Edina Residents: The City of Edina is considering allowing a strip mall to be built on the corner of Lincoln Dr. and Londonderry on the vacant piece of land that was once used as a temporary parking lot for United Health Group. Tf you'are in opposition to a strip, mall being built in that location, please sign this petition: If you are interested in more information, please call the City of Edina Planning Dept. at 826 -0369. It is very important that we have a significant turnout of people at the city council. planning commission on: December;1;. 1999 at 7:30 pm at the.Edina,City Hall: NAME ADDRESS November 24, 1999 Manor Homes of Edina Residents: The City of Edina is considering allowing a strip mall to be built on the corner of Lincoln Dr. and Londonderry on.the vacant piece of land that was once used as a temporary parking lot for United Health Group. If you are in opposition to a strip mall being built in'that location, please sign this petition: If you are interested in more information, please call the City of Edina Planning Dept. at 826 - 0369. It is very important that we have a significant turnout of people at the city council planning commission on: December-1, 1999 at 7:30 pm at the Edina City Hall:; NAME ADDRESS A/q� -a-iA T��-�� Mae tiq au_<< November 24, 1999 Manor Homes of Edina Residents: The City of Edina is considering allowing a strip mall to be built on the corner of Lincoln Dr. and Londonderry on the vacant piece of land that was once used as a temporary parking lot for United Health Group. if 'you, are` in opposition to a strip mall being built in that location; please sign. this petition. If you are interested in more information, please call the City of Edina Planning Dept. at 826 -0369. It is very important that we have a significant turnout of people at the city council planning commission on: December 1, 1999 at 7:30'pnm at the Edina City Hall: NAME ADDRESS -�T t F November 24. 1999 Manor Homes of Edina Residents: The City of Edina is considering allowing a strip mall to. be built . on the corner of Lincoln Dr. and Londonderry on the vacant piece of land that was once used as a temporary parking lot for United Health Group. If you are ,in opposition to a strip mall being built' in,that. location, please sign this petition,. If you are interested in more information, please call the City of Edina Planning Dept. at 826 -0369. It is very important that we have a significant turnout of people at the city council planning commission on: December 1, 1999. at- 7:30 pm at the Edina _City. Hall.: NAME ADDRESS �d Yw �.1 44'j r November 15, 1999 To: Edina City Planning Commission Re: Proposed rezoning of property at intesection of Lincoln Drive and Londonderry Road I am President of the Londonderry Townhouse Association. Londonderry Townhouses are adjacent to the subject property. The Board of Directors of our Association has determined that we do not have the authority to speak on behalf of our membership to the extent of suggesting a single point of view for the entire Association; nor do the current Board members wish to do that. What we have done is to advise our membership of the proposed rezoning and minimall construction, and also provided a simple survey for the members. The surveys returned are attached, and they include some individual comments and letters,.so I encourage you to read them, but I "will also summarize the results.here. It was unclear to us whether the Planning Commission might be more interest in a survey done by individual person .(i.e. voter), or by townhouse, so we provided a survey to each adult member, and I will provide the summary both ways. However as it happens the results are essentially the same statistically.. Individuals By House Agreeing with the proposal: 6 4 Neutral towards the proposal: 2 2 Disagreeing with the proposal: 21 15 No survey returned: 22 15 Bennett I. Moyle President Londonderry Townhouse Association mail address: 5788 Lincoln Drive, Edina MN 55436 phone: 612- 933 -2885 fax: 612 - 933 -7764 November 8, 1999 Londonderry Townhouse Association Minimall Proposal Survey Cover Letter As you know, Haugland Company has proposed to build a 'minimall' on the corner of Lincoln Drive and Londonderry Road. This requires rezoning of that property. The Edina City Planning Commission met recently regarding the proposal. Several residents from our association and other properties in the vicinity attended the meeting, mostly to oppose the development. Many individuals stated that the rezoning signs had been up so little time before the meeting that.there was not sufficient time to prepare responses. The Commission decided to defer their decision until their next meeting (scheduled for 7:30 p.m. Wednesday December 1, at Edina City Hall). The Londonderry Townhouse Association Board of Directors met on Wednesday November 3, 1999, to discuss the proposed minimall. All residents should have received a copy of this proposed development. If not, please call Ross Peterson (920 -9388) to get a copy. The Board wants to be able to reflect the opinions of its membership to the Planning Commission,and the Commission seems to prefer to hear from the affected condominiums and townhouse groups as a unit. However there is nothing in the Association's Bylaws and Declarations that specifies that the Board may put forth a single position for the Association, and the Board doesn't prefer doing that anyway. It was decided to do a simple survey. The survey (attached) includes a sentence to which the Board would like your response, and there is also room to include additional comments. Since we don't know whether the Commission prefers to hear opinions by 'home' or by 'citizen /voter', werve provided two forms for each unit. The Board will summarize the responses by unit and by person (one vote per form) and present both to the Planning Commission. We will also include copies of each form to the Commission, but they are more likely to use one of the summaries in their consideration. You may also represent your views independently to the Commission, by writing a letter, attending the Commission meeting, or signing any petitions which may be circulated. Please understand that the proposal is for a retail development, and although Haugland Company has proposed a specific construction and possible tenants, the rezoning per se only assures that certain types of retail tenants may be permitted. Board of Directors, Londonderry Townhouse Association Londonderry Townhouse Association. . Minimall Proposal Survey Proposition: I like the retail minimall development as proposed by Haugland Company at intersection of Lincoln Drive and Londonderry Road. Circle one: Agree Neutral Disagree Other comments: Name • --� Unit Number:�G9 Street: Return survey by 9 p.m. Friday, November 12, 1999, to the garage mail slot at 5708 Tucker Lane (John Pope). RICHARD C. JOHNSON AT wzy AT LAW $700 TUCKER LANE EDINA. MINNESOTA 55436.1618 TELEPHONE )612) 930.9040 ADMITTED IN THE FAcsIMILB )612) 933.6834 DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AND MINNESOTA Mr. Gordon Johnson Chairman, Edina Planning Commission c/o Edina Planning Department Edina City Hall 4801 West 50'h Street Edina, MN 55424 November 9, 1999 Re: Proposed amendment of the comprehensive land use plan from single family to commercial, Tracts A and B RLS number 1378 Dear Mr. Johnson: In connection with the above, the following is submitted: ■ Retail and commercial use of the subject site is not in keeping with the land use of the adjacent and mostly residential property. For the residents of western Edina, there is no demonstrable need for the retail and commercial uses permitted under PCD -1 zoning. During the rush hours, the traffic at the Bren Road /Londonderry interchange is regularly congested, and at times gridlock. • The congestion has: been increasing by reason of the construction of new office buildings in the Opus development; and resulted in the significant increased use of the Vernon Avenue /Lincoln. Road corridor as well as Dovre Drive and the streets adjoining Dovre. • According to the latest traffic count, 45,000 vehicles a day use Highway 169 south of the interchange. It seems. reasonable to assume that some of those vehicles will end up at the proposed development. • Any development of the subject site, except perhaps for R -1 or R -2, will exacerbate the adjacent traffic congestion. Even disregarding the "trip generation" guidelines, retail and commercial development will increase that congestion the most. It should also be noted that many fast food outlets do not include a drive - through facility. It is entirely possible therefore, that if the Planning Commission and the Council approve the rezoning, the Golden Arches or another fast food outlet will locate on the subject site. It seems fair to say that that type of use will add significantly to adjacent traffic congestion, especially during the rush hours. One last point. As Commissioner Byron observed at the October 27"' meeting, property owners have the right to develop their property. True, but over the years the City has acquired undeveloped land for many laudable purposes (and thereby preventing development), including land for parks and open space. However, on at least one occasion, the City acquired undeveloped land exclusively to preserve neighborhood amenities. In the early 1970's Karl Krahl owned a large hilly and wooded tract of land (then called " Krahl's Hill') located adjacent to Vernon Avenue and westerly of the Viking Hills subdivision, and wanted to develop it for residential purposes. Such development, however, would have resulted in the diminution of the hill and the trees on the tract, to which the Viking Hills homeowners objected. Because of that objection, the City acquired Krahl's Hill, which today remains in its pristine state and is still owned by the City: My point is this: Is not the prevention of further traffic congestion at least as laudable as preserving neighborhood amenities? If so, I urge that the City acquire the subject site, either through. a gift from United Healthcare or otherwise. In the alternative, perhaps the City can convince United Healthcare to improve the property for employee recreational use. In any case, I urge the Planning Commission to turn down the proposed rezoning for the reasons stated above. Respectfully, Richard C. Johnson P.S. It would be most appreciated if a copy of this letter were provided to each of the other Commission members. Londonderry Townhouse Association Minimall Proposal Survey Proposition: I like the retail minimall development as proposed by Haugland Company at intersection of Lincoln Drive and Londonderry Road. Circle one: Agree Neutral Disagree Other comments: V� o -r- LID vK ce +r- k'-' 1 y� Unit Number: g- Street- Return survey by 9 p.m. Friday, November 12, 1999, to the garage mail slot at 5708 Tucker Lane (John Pope). a- Londonderry Townhouse Association Minimall Proposal Survey Proposition: I like the retail minimall development as proposed by Haugland Company at intersection of Lincoln Drive and Londonderry Road. Circle one: Agree Neutral Disagree Other comments: bill Name: Unit Number:. 2a P Street: Return survey by-9 p.m. Friday, November 12, 1999, to the garage mail slot at 5708 Tucker Lane (John Pope). Londonderry Townhouse Association Minimall Proposal Survey Proposition: I like the retail minimall development as proposed by Haugland Company at intersection of Lincoln Drive and Londonderry Road. Circle one: Agree Neutral Disagree Other comments: �•�'�- �► 74tp %t-"- - �yys Name: stlri Unit Number:-'5�-7/0 Street: Return survey by 9 p.m. Friday, November 12, 1999, to the garage mail slot at 5708 Tucker Lane (John Pope). Londonderry Townhouse Association Minimall Proposal Survey Proposition: I like the retail minimall development as proposed by Haugland Company at intersection of Lincoln Drive and Londonderry Road. Circle one: (Agree Neutral Disagree Other comments: Name: `rte Oi�1f7 Unit Number : S Street: Return survey by 9 p.m. Friday, November 12, 1999, to the garage mail slot at 5708 Tucker Lane (John Pope). Londonderry.Townhouse Association Minimall Proposal Survey Proposition: I like the,retail minimall development as proposed by Haugland Company at intersection of Lincoln Drive and Londonderry Road. Circle one: Agree Neutral Disagree Other comments: Name: Z�- Unit Number: Y Street: Return survey by 9 p.m. Friday, November 12, 1999, to the garage mail slot at 5708 Tucker Lane (John Pope). Londonderry Townhouse Association Minimall Proposal Survey Proposition: I like the retail minimall development as proposed by Haugland Company at intersection of Lincoln Drive and Londonderry Road. Circle one: Agree Neutral Disagree Other.comments - /;-7/ Name: Unit Number: Street: -v Return survey by 9 p.m. Friday, November 12, 1999, to the garage mail slot at 5708 Tucker Lane (John Pope). Londonderry Townhouse Association Minimall Proposal Survey Proposition: I like the retail mLnimall development as proposed by Haugland Company at intersection of Lincoln Drive.and Londonderry Road. Circle one: Agree Neutral Disagree Other comments: L/ .Ie 1, l�� , f C IL Name: 1 lam �?j % Streets Unit Number: S k f tit r /-�i7 / �•. L Return survey by 9 p.m. Friday, November 12, 1999, to the garage. mail slot at 5708 Tucker Lane (John Pope). November 14, 1999 To: Edina City Planning Commission Re: Proposed rezoning of property at intesection of Lincoln Drive and Londonderry Road I write to oppose rezoning subject property to PCD -1 or PCD -2. I live at 5736 Tucker Lane, and own a company officed in the Londonderry Office Park. Both properties are adjacent to the subject property. I have reviewed the staff proposal of October 27, as well as the minimall plan design from Haugland Construction. I submit that the principal reason why this construction appears attractive to the developer is a significant reason why it is unattractive to the neighborhood - there is nothing else like it nearby. But that is essentially what zoning is intended to prevent. The surrounding properties are residential communities, and low office buildings, and both the office buildings and the houses are shrouded from conspicuous view by tree stands and berms. I suspect this latter point may be overlooked by the Commission, it is not.in the staff report. The current office buildings blend in very well,. Although the Haugland plan design includes some large trees, I wonder if they will be that large initially, and in any case individual trees only provide cover half of the year. Moreover it seems likely that the structure will be rendered conspicuous for retail reasons. At least in the winter time I will be able to see lighted signs on the property from my living room window. The point is that it seems most unlikely that the proposed minimall will blend in as well as current office structures do. The staff report alludes to the fact that the property was acquired by United Health after Highway 169 was constructed. I believe that statement is misleading. The referenced. construction was completed in the early 19801s. United Health has only been in the area for a few years, and probably acquired it in conjunction with their use as a temporary parking lot 2 years ago. "After" therefore is some 15+ years, quite different from the implication of the report. I don't really see why it is very important, but the staff report seems to pin some of its support,upon it. Much of the discussion seems to focus on traffic concerns. Lincoln- Londonderry does have a significant problem at morning and evening business periods. The staff report suggests that adding more office space will increase traffic at peak periods, whereas the minimall would not. I challenge both points. Certainly an office would add some peak traffic, but a one -story office building such as Londonderry Office Park's would only accomodate a number of tenants that would be trivial in the peak flow of Lincoln- Londonderry. The vast majority of that traffic comes from the Opus Industrial Park on the West side of Highway 169. Opus is huge, and still building. Moreover, if only a trivial fraction of the existing peak traffic decides to stop at the proposed minimall as a part of their passage through the intersection on any given day, and they will, it will add more traffic than a small office building would. Also, although local residents will tend to avoid the minimall during peak traffic periods, it is still likely that enough will visit it then so as add nearly as much traffic to the intersection as a small office building. I conclude that the assertion that an office building would add more traffic is wrong. Although it.may not be within the Planning Commission's domain to consider, I point out that one prospective use of the property would be to add a partial clover -leaf to the intersection. A ramp from Londonderry heading East curving South and then North onto Highway 169 would eliminate the current troublesome left turn for East -to -North traffic in the evening, and would remove the conflict between such traffic and the North -to -West traffic in the morning. Although there are four quandrants to the Londonderry -H.169 intersection, those two factors are the biggest problem areas in their respective times of day. It seems odd the recent upgrades to the ramps (HOV lanes).didn't include that, given that the property is undeveloped. I can't say that I really want the extra pavement that close to my front door either, but if traffic dictates it I suspect zoning won't stop it, and it seems inefficient to build any new buildings if such highway construction is a serious prospect there. I.suggest the pertinent highway agency be queried about this possibility. Unless the highway ramp is a serious possibility, I would think a office building similar in construction and landscape characteristics to the Londonderry Office Building would be a much more consistent and thus preferable use of the subject property. Bennett I. Moyle 5736 Tucker Lane Edina MN 55436 mail address: 5788 Lincoln Drive, Edina MN 55436 phone: 612 - 933 -2885 fax: 612 - 933 -7764 Londonderry Townhouse Association Minimall Proposal Survey Proposition: I like the retail minimall development as proposed by Haugl and Company at intersection of Lincoln Drive.and Londonderry Road.. Circle one: Agree Neutral Disagree Other comments: Name Unit Number: U/ Street.: .J Return survey by 9 p.m. Friday, November 12, 1999, to the garage mail slot at 5708 Tucker Lane (John Pope). I am against the proposed strip mall for the following reasons: 1. I am concerned that if a strip mall is built on the property in question we will loose the "residential' neighborhood/atmosphere that we now have. The office buildings that presently exist. in the area maintain the residential atmosphere and I would.not oppose construction of a similar structure that blends into the environment; develop the area into a park; or use the land to divert some of the existing traffic trying to get onto 169. 2. Traffic during rush hour is already a problem and is getting worse each year with the existing businesses- a strip mall (if successful) will only add to the congestion and stretch it out throughout the day rather than just during rush hour as it is now. There is a problem with traffic trying to get onto 169 and I believe that problem should be solved before we deliberately increase traffic with retail businesses. 3. I am not convinced that a strip mall will be successful in the proposed area because I think existing traffic will be a deterrent to people supporting the mall. If the proposal is not successful, I fear what follows. I realize there is a desire to develop the property and I support the development of something that will not significantly add to the existing traffic congestion and /or alleviate the existing traffic problem; something that will blend into the neighborhood resembling "residential "; and something that is beneficial to United Health Care and residential properties. Londonderry Townhouse Association Minimall Proposal Survey Proposition: I like the retail minimall development as proposed by Haugland Company at intersection of Lincoln Drive and Londonderry Road. Circle one: Agree Neutral Disagree Other comments ef Name: Jon C_- Unit . Number: Street: 0 l,C.GI ca-ki Return survey by 9 p.m. Friday, November 12, 1999, to the garage mail slot at 5708 Tucker.Lane (John Pope).. Londonderry Townhouse Association Minimall Proposal Survey Proposition: I like the retail ininimiall development as proposed by Haugland Company at intersection of Lincoln Drive and Londonderry Road. Circle one: Agree Neutral Disagree Traffic in this AREA IS A MAJOR DANGEROUS PROBLEM. Other comments: I most definately feel this strip - mall.would add to the traffic problem in this area which is impossible at present. Morning, noon and evening it is a dangerous intersection. At present we have all of these facilities.within a mile of our home.. With precious little land -- available in Edina one would feel it wiser to,beautify and preserve the reputation of our city, rather than degrade it with a strip -mall. A park would be appropriate. It seems rather interesting to put a traffic counter on the street on a holiday, 11/11/99, which does not appear to be an accurate representation of traffic unless it is there during a typical week. Name: Unit Number: Street: Old -Z Return survey by 9 p.m. Friday, November 12, 1999, to the garage mail slot at 5708 Tucker Lane (John Pope). Londonderry Townhouse Association Minimall Proposal Survey Proposition: I like the retail minimall development as proposed by Haugland Company at intersection of Lincoln Drive.and Londonderry Road. Circle one: Agree Neutral Disagree The property should not be rezoned to commercial stripmall. Other comments: Excessive traffic presently exists at this intersection from both East and West of Hwy 169 Name Unit Number: Street: Return survey by 9 p.m. Friday, November 12, 1999, to the garage mail slot at 5708 Tucker Lane (John Pope). Londonderry Townhouse Association Minimall Proposal Survey Proposition: I like the retail minimall.develop;rnent as proposed by Haugland Company at intersection of Lincoln Drive and Londonderry Road. Circle one: Agree Neutral Disagree Other comments: Name: 3 v �i.- 't- c_ Unit Number: Street_: �� ►� c r- Return survey by 9 p.m. Friday, November 12, 199911 to the garage mail slot at 5708 Tucker Lane (John Pope). Londonderry Townhouse Association Minimall Proposal Survey Proposition: I like the retail minimall development as proposed by Haugland Company at intersection of Lincoln Drive and Londonderry Road. Circle one: Agree Neutral Disagree Other comments: y > r , Name: K. Unit Numbe 5709 Street: D(-.)AJCAAJ Return survey by 9 p.m. Friday, November 12, 1999, to the garage mail slot at 5708 Tucker Lane (John.Pope). Londonderry Townhouse Association Minimall Proposal Survey Proposition: I like the retail minimall development as proposed by Hau gland Company at intersection of.Lincoln Drive and Londonderry Road. Circle one: Agree Neutral Disagree Other ,comments : I / - _ 1 des 4 v re �b rz L � Aj D 4- c C.0 N 77201 v�� D s vIV DQVQ - -40 -P- 0 6A- IDe-V z 40 e. o RAJ 5'15i4 c Lj I'm Dk j k, f r ,v.e ,.►` Nam A R L 4- &- B131 6 /d v FwI f4 �✓�/ Unit Number: S %Jq Street: AJ Return survey by 9 p.m. Friday, November 12, 1999, to the garage mail slot at 5708 Tucker Lane (John Pope). Londonderry Townhouse Association Minimall Proposal Survey Proposition: I like the retail mir_imall development as propcsed by Haugland. Company at intersection of Lincoln Drive and Londonderry Road. Circle one: Agree Neutral Disagree Other comments: �l 1e GoMun,' c�vco in't r►�� P4,4�Aa Q2az %s z. /2e::Zd'q Name Unit. Number: Street: IaLlr)CI l) Lct Return survey by 9 p.m. Friday, November 12, 1999, to the garage mail slot at 5708 Tucker Lane (John Pope). Londonderry Townhouse Association Minimall Proposal Survey Proposition: I like the retail.minimall development as proposed by Haugland. Company at intersection of Lincoln Drive and Londonderry Road. Circle one: Agree Neutral Disagree other comments: w Inu c ble m aL`e ) c.6 �Y L ctdrA l ,L- O- roth'F'-� -1WO544 tul- WV-W, ill& ic_ thtA. � as rnucln maze. &X(W . Ob acu'dcrt-S ka��►�S• (i•C dad. rnO � bYwb 04/v- tn�-M kdusk Wi'tii a m wq n J-e ac w s s bl-e- People. ..Q;c, je' tv 6c, c�-6 Le' {-b }NI.0 w-"A.Ov5 Name : V 6 • Cd)vt ad 7bf Unit Number: 5 -11-1 Street: bZArIC4 -+n - Return survey by 9 p.m. Friday, November 12, 1999, to the garage mail slot at 5708 Tucker Lane (John Pope). Londonderry Townhouse Association Minimall Proposal Survey Proposition: i like the retail minimall development as proposed by Haugland Company at 'intersection of Lincoln Drive and Londonderry Road. Circle one: Agree Neutral Disagree Other comments: �i a ku5c beLo (' �le Out Vie, i'` a �e� iLA c ,I b ,-f ca . m cn-e da.ng-,t 66 0 Q d! L f6� b'Ab Uir-,,- fDWY kOu4ti l.jlt+A G� M%ni rrWj�f? GGIU55 {}� u.0 l ie. tk-e, 'L6 b4,� L-3c*-o arm 40, . 6b c� � -mob Name: jf -\I\ ' C6"Cck R+Lev— Unit Number: 511-1 Street: DUnCC,t l Return survey by 9 p.m. Friday, November 12, 1999, to the garage mail slot at 5708 Tucker Lane (John Pope). Londonderry Townhouse Association Minimall Proposal Survey Proposition: I like the retail minimall development as proposed by Haugland Company at intersection of Lincoln Drive and Londonderry Road. Circle one: Agree Neutral isa re Other comments: / « �'� 11e ry v�n�c��n 2�a�� \�� — �z. C[Xl,�� -r 1c� � �sar�� 1Z-� i/�� -v `� �'�� c � 25�L. �1�, � ( ✓!/k}(^ cA � ✓! P—L)eAIA -" TA-e- 1 re d (i d<< < O: .n) d z tc� rr-rpcj � Name: Unit Number: Street CV, Return survey by 9 p.m. Friday, November 12, 1999, to the garage mail slot at 5708 Tucker Lane (John Pope). Londonderry Townhouse Association Minimall Proposal Survey Proposition: I like the retail minimall Company at intersection of Circle one: Agree Other comments: %, Name: development as proposed by Haugland Lincoln Drive and Londonderry Road. Neutral (D- s a p t Unit Number : -1 MO Street : ` Return survey by 9 p.m. Friday, November 12, 1999, to the garage mail slot at 5708 Tucker Lane (John Pope). Londonderry Townhouse Association Minimall Proposal Survey Proposition: I like the retail minimall developi,ient as proposed by Haugland Company at intersection of Lincoln Drive and Londonderry Road. Circle one: Agree Neutral Disagre Other comments: Within a radius of four miles of this intersection of Lincoln Drive and Londonderry Road several shopa ping areas provide many choices of grocery stores, Dry cleaners,restuarants ETC. We dont need or want a retail complex at this location. Name: Unit Numh : Street: Return survey by 9 p.m. Friday, November 12, 1999, to the garage mail slot at 5708 Tucker Lane (John Pope). Londonderry Townhouse Association Minimall Proposal Survey Proposition: I like the retail minimall development as proposed by Haugland Company at intersection of Lincoln Drive and Londonderry Road. Circle one: Agree Neutral Disagree Other comments: C A Ck AAA Vo C() Name:Q Unit. Number: �j �Z�� Street: lA/1�000,�,L dC�1LQ — Cnka\ Return survey by 9 p.m. Friday, November 12, 1999, to the garage mail slot at 5708.Tucker Lane (John Pope). Londonderry Townhouse Association Minimall Proposal Survey Proposition: I like the retail minimall develop:rent as proposed by Haugland Company at intersection of Lincoln Drive and Londonderry Road. Circle one: Agree Neutral. Disagree Other comments: Name: C� Unit Number: Street: S)OXJC7q k) Return survey by 9 p.m. Friday, November 12, 1999, to the garage mail slot at 5708 Tucker Lane (John Pope). Londonderry Townhouse Association Minimall Proposal Survey Proposition: I like the retail niri:nall development- as proposed by Haugland Company at intersection. of Lincoln Drive and Londonderry.Road. Circle one: gree' Neutral Disagree Other comments: Name: Unit Number: �j'� Street.C7 Return survey by 9 p.m. Friday, November 12, 1999, to the garage mail slot at 5708 Tucker Lane (John Pope). I Londonderry Townhouse Association Minimall Proposal Survey Proposition: I like the retail minimall development as proposed by Haugland Company at intersection of Lincoln Drive and Londonderry Road. Circle one: Agree Neutral Disagree Other comments: Name: Unit Number: Street: Return survey by 9 p.m. Friday, November 12, 1999, to the garage mail slot at 5708 Tucker Lane (John Pope). Londonderry Townhouse Association Minimall Proposal Survey Proposition: I like the retail minimall.development as proposed by Haugland Company at intersection of.Lincoln Drive and Londonderry Road. Circle one: Agree Neutral Disagree. Other comments: Q V�12C� FiN�r lY�✓(5£cfuirt,. � ��.v� Name: Unit Number: Street: A/6 Return survey by 9 p.m. Friday, November 12, 19991 to the garage mail slot at 5708 Tucker Lane (John Pope). Londonderry Townhouse Association. Minimall Proposal Survey Proposition: I.like the retail minimall development as proposed by Haugland Company at intersection of Lincoln Drive and Londonderry Road. Circle one:. Agree Neutral =Disagree Other comments: -L Name: ��lo Unit Number: ��J Street: Return survey by 9 p.m. Friday, November 12, 1999, to the garage mail slot at 5708 Tucker Lane (John Pope). Londonderry Townhouse Association Minimall Proposal Survey Proposition: I like the retail minimall. Company at intersection of Circle one: Agree Other comments: .Name: �0y, Ma "'. \Nam development.as proposed by Haugland Lincoln Drive and Londonderry Road. Neutral Disagree Unit Number: j ?�i Street : 'UU�gah 41&4_1 Return survey by 9 p.m. Friday, November 12, 1999, to the garage mail slot at 5708 Tucker Lane (John Pope). Londonderry Townhouse Association Minimall Proposal Survey Propositions I like the retail minimall development as proposed by Haugland Company at intersection of Lincoln Drive and Londonderry Road. Circle one: Agree Neutral Disagree Other comments: Name: da '))2 D er : street: Unit Number: Return survey by 9 p.m. Friday, November 12, 1999, to the garage mail slot at 5708 Tucker Lane (John Pope). �9y .. L IL V-"g' -4 34 > ,Yq- Fo' 9 nhT . A V611, C�n-�Cl a� • � �nnr� 3wVN e:10gauu1m 6eu®P3 X14 0S 49aM 4 GOV 6eu'p3 i Hip ®3 66Ei i `.®agtuaAaN cY strip mall traffic v1n� �r Coe/( 0 J :T)�\14� z_. j RICHARD C. JOHNSON ATTORNEY AT LAW 5700 TUCKER LANE EDINA, MINNESOTA 55436 -1618 TELEPHONE (612) 930 -9040 FACSIMILE (612) 933 -6834 ADMITTED IN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AND MINNESOTA Mr. Gordon Johnson Chairman, Edina Planning Commission c/o Edina Planning Department Edina City Hall 4801 West 501h Street Edina, MN 55424 November 9, 1999 Re: Proposed amendment of the comprehensive land use plan from single family to commercial, Tracts A and B RLS number 1378 Dear Mr. Johnson: In connection with the above, the following is submitted: • Retail and commercial use of the subject site is not in keeping with the land use of the adjacent and mostly residential property. • For the residents of western Edina, there is no demonstrable need for the retail and commercial uses permitted under PCD 71 zoning. • During the rush hours, the traffic at the Bren Road /Londonderry interchange is regularly congested, and at times gridlock. ■ The congestion has: been increasing by reason of the construction of new office buildings in the Opus development; and resulted in the significant increased use of the Vernon Avenue /Lincoln Road corridor as well as Dovre Drive and the streets adjoining Dovre. • According to the latest traffic count, 45,000 vehicles a day use Highway 169 south of the interchange. It seems reasonable to assume that some of those vehicles will end up at the proposed development. • Any development of the subject site, except perhaps for R -1 or R -2, will exacerbate the adjacent traffic congestion. Even disregarding the "trip generation" guidelines, retail and commercial development will increase that congestion the most. It should also be noted that many fast food outlets do not include a drive - through facility. It is entirely possible therefore, that if the Planning Commission and the Council approve the rezoning, the Golden Arches or another fast food outlet will locate on the subject site. It seems fair to say that that type of use will add significantly to adjacent traffic congestion, especially during the rush hours. One last point. As Commissioner Byron observed at the October 27th meeting, property owners have the right to develop their property. True, but over the, years the City has acquired undeveloped land for many laudable purposes (and thereby preventing development), including land for parks and open space. However, on at least one occasion, the City acquired undeveloped land exclusively to preserve neighborhood amenities. In the early 1970's Karl Krahl owned a large hilly and wooded tract of land (then called " Krahl's Hill's located adjacent to Vernon Avenue and westerly of the Viking Hills subdivision, and wanted to develop it for residential purposes. Such development, however, would have resulted in the diminution of the hill and the trees on the. tract, to which the Viking Hills homeowners objected. Because of that objection, the City acquired Krahl's Hill, which today remains in its pristine state and is still owned by the City. My point is this: Is not the prevention of further traf`ic congestion at least as laudable as preserving neighborhood amenities? If so, I urge that the City acquire the subject site, either through a gift from United Healthcare or otherwise. In the alternative, perhaps the City can convince United Healthcare to improve the property for employee recreational use. In any case, I urge the Planning Commission to turn down the proposed rezoning for the reasons stated above. Respectfully, ichard C. ]car son P.S. It would be most appreciated if a copy of this letter were provided to each of the other Commission members. November 17, 1999 Dr. William McGuire CEO,UnitedHealth Group 9900Bren Road East Suite 300 Minnetonka,MN 55343 Re: Proposed Use of UHG Property at Lincoln Dr and Londonderry Dear Dr. McGuire, We are your neighbors of your company headquarters, the Opus Tower in Minnetonka, and of your Edina Complex on Lincoln Drive, and.we, as you, care about our neighborhood. We live in the Londonderry Tqwnhomes. We,write this letter to you because.we have been made aware that the property owned by.UnitedHealth Group at the corner of Lincoln Drive and Londonderry Road has been proposed to be sold to the Haugland Company for use as a "stripmall ". We are certain that you have experienced the same frustration as.we have in'trying to leave this intersection - going North, South, East or West - it is a challenge at any time of day. In Edina, as elsewhere, open spaces are precious and few. With all of the press surrounding the Health Care industry lately, positive and negative,,wouldn't just a little more positive thinking and press be great! Please.wouldn't you consider taking this land and making it a park or perhaps just leaving it wild? How beautiful it,would look to your offices and the-community, dedicated to the millions of people that UnitedHealth Group serves,right here in the view of your headquarters.. Please do not let this proposed decision stand as is. The deadline is approaching: December 1, 1999. We are long -term residents of Edina and had hoped that the community.would never succumb to revenue over the beauty of our. city. We ask that you share this ideal. Thank you for taking the time to read our letter and to consider what,we say. Most S'ncer ly Yours, Harry and Pa Goodyear 5705 Duncan Lane Edina, MN 55436 cc: Edina Planning Commission Edina City Council Star Tribune November 17, 1999 Mr. Scott Johnson Edina City Council C/O Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Johnson: My wife and I have lived at 4804 Dunberry Lane for over 20 years. I understand a request has or will be made for a variance on a lot at the corner of W.69th Street and Brittany Road, in order to accommodate moving a house to that location. This property is less than 500 feet from our house. We would like to go on record as opposing the granting of such a variance. The neighborhood has undergone a considerable number of changes recently due to the construction and expansion of Christ. Presbyterian Church. At the time of the church project, the neighbors requested that W. 691h Street be moved 20 feet to. the south. This was denied. As a result of the smaller lot remaining, a request for variance is now being made to accommodate physically moving an "oversized" house to the property. The neighbors assumed that new construction would be involved on the above referenced property and for the property to the north of W. 69th Street. This apparently isn't true, as one house has already been moved there (it also.appears too big for the lot -was a variance granted for it ?). Now a second house is to be moved, if the variance is granted. These lots should clearly not be considered new construction as existing houses are involved!. Enough compromises have been made to land use in the area! We feel there should be no further need to modify lot sizes to accommodate the wishes of landowners. Land value is at a premium in Edina. Anything like this could potentially impact the integrity of the immediate neighborhood and the adjacent property. The city of Edina prides itself on being a progressive community that does not allow the variances typically allowed by other communities. We would hope that this request is emphatically denied. Please give us your support on this matter. Thank you for your assistance.. Sincerely, Richard . Fol 4804 Dun Lane Bonnie Foley L�,` F -1 -F5. COKNIC.25 WcORATNE MEMO CAt ,/b / = 1 1 a // INPMDVAj.1 -Y Wul r5b- S-1GKUr LEITERS K DF -C-7W v - Uc t- BRISK flxru R -S <CANVAS AwNINCTS Kbr, cL 61-5cK I I I �t—r CZE&: 6rAH DfU:-I- GiA56 NMcamnVE MrrAL C-rRIL4- k. METAL R*lf:-' ,$18/ CLICK rr -ATUR- Korsunsky Krank Erickson EDINA /I(Dq a.,pcc N. 00 -08- 1055 -01 Sheet tec Archits, Inc. Arc tec DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL s.t. October 15, 1c1gA 300 Avenue North Minneapolis. 4N 55401 HAUSLAND PROPERTY KKED— by 012/339 -4200 FAX 342 -9267 cn.cN.a by Em CopA t Cei2M by Kwww sky K-* Md— Architects, Inc. CANOPY' C�+ ;I 1. L9 N d° N Pr- KAY K°AD rrmumr -mr NORTH Korsunnky Kr.nk Erickwon EDINA /Ibq Protect No. 00- 06 -IM -01 shy KKE"00rimL A nue DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL Date October 26.1989 700 Firal Avenue North Minneapolis. NN 0040! HAUSLAND PROPERTY DMW by m 012/330 -4100 rN! 719 -9909 CgrAht®3000 by Kommsky Kmrtk bkkion AtchtKm Inc `S el M ME REPORT /RECOMMENDATION Recommendation: Final Plat approval subject to Subdivision Dedication based on an unimproved land value of $60,000.00. Info /Background: All other conditions for final approval have been satisfied. o To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item: Il. B. From: Craig Larsen Consent ❑ City Planner Information Only ❑ Date: December 21, 1999 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: JMS Addition to Edina Action ❑ Motion ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Final Plat approval subject to Subdivision Dedication based on an unimproved land value of $60,000.00. Info /Background: All other conditions for final approval have been satisfied. Im Subdivision No. G — 9 9— ( 0 SUBDIVISION DEDICATION REPORT TO: City Council FROM: Planning Department 4- 0 Subdivision Name: CUJIO�J Land Size: l c�— Land .Value: Co a . 000 (By; Date: ) The developer of this subdivision has been required to A. Grant an easement over part of the land B. Dedicate % of the land �C. Donate $ as a fee in lieu of land As a result of applying the following policy: A. Land required (no density or intensity may be used for the first 5% of land dedicated) 1. If property is adjacent to an existing park or playground and the addition beneficially expands the park or playground. 2. If property is six acres or will be combined with future dedications so that the end result will be a minimum of a six acre park. 3. If property abuts a natural lake, pond, or stream or wetland then protected by state or federal law. 4. If property is necessary for storm water holding or will be dredged or otherwise improved for storm water holding areas or ponds. , 5. If the property is a. place of significant natural, scenic or historic value. B. Cash Required 1. In all other instances than above. ,r MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL SEPTEMBER 21,1999 - 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Faust, Hovland, Johnson, and Mayor Maetzold. Member Kelly entered the meeting at 7:10 P.M. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Hovland and seconded by Member Johnson approving the Council Consent Agenda as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Maetzold Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 7,1999, APPROVED Motion made by Member Hovland and seconded by Member Johnson approving the Minutes of the September 7,1999 Regular Council Meeting. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR TMS ADDITION TO EDINA (5233 RICHWOOD DRIVE) APPROVED Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Presentation by Planner Planner Larsen explained the subject property is a developed single dwelling lot measuring 39,029 square feet in area. The proposed subdivision would split off the northerly portion of the property to create one new buildable lot. The existing dwelling would remain. He noted the new lot would meet all Edina Subdivision Ordinance requirements for the neighborhood median average as follows; 500 Foot Neighborhood Lot Width Lot Depth Lot Area 90 feet 140 feet 12,816 sf Proposed Lots Lot 1 103 feet 161 feet 19,595 sf Lot 2 104 feet 160 feet 19,434 sf Both lots exceed median averages for lot width, lot depth and lot area. He concluded that no variances are needed. Mr. Larsen said that both lots contain a low, water collection area in the rear yard that periodically contain standing water. He said that when the Richmond Hills subdivision was designed in 1950, the rear portion of this and the adjacent lot were to be developed into a storm water pond. The pond was never developed, but the area still serves as a drainage area for the neighborhood. Mr. Larsen said that in order to insure adequate storm water capacity, much of the rear yard will need to be subject to a drainage easement similar to the lot to the Page 1 minutes/Edina City Council/September 21,1999 a north. He concluded stating the Planning Commission recommends approval of the preliminary plat with three conditions: 1) Final Plat; 2) Subdivision Dedication; and 3) Drainage Easement. Mayor Maetzold called for public comment. No one appeared to speak. Member Kelly made a motion, seconded by Member Johnson to close the public hearing at 7:35 p.m. Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold Motion carried. Member Johnson made a motion introducing the following resolution and moving its adoption: RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY AT APPROVAL TO JMS ADD ION BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the ity of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitle "JMS ADDITION ", platted Jeff and Nancy Schoenwetter, and presented at the regu meeting of the City Co cil on September 21, 1999, be and is hereby granted prelimin plat approval wit three conditions: Final Plat approval, Subdivision Dedication, an a granting of a ainage easement as approved by the City Engineer.. Passed this 2181 day of September, 9. Member Hovland seconded the motio . Rollcall: Aye: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, old Resolution adopted. *BID AWARDED FOR M' CONTRACT Motion made by award of bid for municipal fa recommended. low bidder, Asps Motion carried on rollcall vote *BID AWARDED FOR Or Hovland and seconded by truck to sole bidder, Falls Motion carried on rollc AMENDED Coord: 24 hour NO TURN The requestor felt Street and Corn pedestrian traffic. F 10 fiber Hovland a\seconded by Member Johnson for es waste and rentract for one year, 2000, to aste Systems. In9.71. r ayes. AB AND CHASSIS T UCKIWotion made by Member Johnson for award of bid for a ton cab and chassis ,e under State Contract #420857 a 24,500.00. vote - four ayes. RT OF SEPTEMBER 7, 1999, or Bongaarts explained that a request had been receivecfto change the N RED at west 7011, Street and Cornelia Drive to less restrictive hours. sere was an unnecessary delay of vehicles making turns at West 70th Drive when school is not in session and at times when there is little Page 2 W JMS ADDITION r. TA�� E ••- • C7 \ rC� '� n 4 g L1 /r BLOCKFC / :ijn n. 1 S ••••'SS1.4o r 77.0 /,Cep' 1 aq / 2 Imp V �� /------ - - - - -- 185.67 .............. .......... % N8936'28'W :Jc.S'C:HcSTER 0 80 90 1 0 SCALE IN FEET DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: II rid 5--1 Rr BEING 5 FEET IN ODTN AND ADJOINING LOT LINES. AND BEING 10 FEET IN WIDTH AND ADJOINING RIGHT OF WAY LINES AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT. BEARINGS SHOWN ARE ASSUMED. a DENOTES 1/2 INCH BY 14 INCH IRON MONUMENT SET AND MARKED BY LICENSE NO. 20281. 0 DENOTES FOUND IROM MONUMENT TO EDINA C. R. DOC. NO. KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That John K Rplkam and Mary lien Rikkers, husband and wile as jnlnt tenants of the following described properly situate M the Canty Of Hennepin. State of Minnesota, to wit: Lot 9. Black 2. RICHMOND HILLS 2ND ADDITION• according to the recorded plot thereof and situate In Hennepin Canty. Minnesota. Have caused the same to be surveyed and patted as JMS ADDITION TO EDINA and do hereby denote and dedicate to the public for - public use forever the easements as shown an this plat for drainage and utility purposes only. In witness whereof soy John K. Rikkers and Mary Ellen Rikkers• husband and wife as point tenants hove hereunto set their hands this coy of by. Its STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ' The faragWnq Instrument was odmowledged before me this day of 199—. by John K. Rikken and Mary Elen Rlkkers, husband and its as pint tenents. Notary Public, County My Cammisslon Expires: I hereby certify that I have surveyed and platted the property dMicrtbed on this pot as JMS ADDITION TO EDINA; that this plot Is a correct representation of said eurwy that on dietences are correctly shown on the plat In feet and hundredths of a fool; that all momrmenle hove been carrntly paced In the ground as shown; that the Outside boundary Ones are correctly designated on the plat; and that there are no at lands as defined In MS 505.02. Subd. 1. or public highways to be dedicated. Jack Banta. Land Surveyor Minneecto License No. 20281 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing Instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 199 by Jack Bona. Land Surwyor• Minnesota License No. 20281 . Notary Public. County . My Canmbslon EepWw.. -- EDINA. MINNESOTA This plot of JMS ADDITION TO EDINA was appowd and 'accepted by the Clly Council of Edina. Minnesota at a regular meeting thereof hold this day of 199—.. If applicable, the written comments and recommendations of the Commissioner of TronsportXG and the County Htglmwey Engineer how been received by the City or the prescribed 30 day period_ has elapsed without receipt of such comments and meeammandatlans, as pr"ded by Minnesota Statutes. Section 505.03. Subd. 2. CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA. MINESOTA by Mayor by. Clerk TAXPAYER SERMCES DEPARTMENT Hennepin County Minnesota 1 hereby certify that !Dees payable In and prier yeon haw been pay far land described an this plot. Dated this day of 119g— Patrick H. O'Cor mw. Hennepin County Auditor by. Deputy SURWEY DINSON Hennepin County Minnesota - Pursuant to MINK. STAT. Sac 3&!8.595 (1969). this plat has been approved this day of 199— . Gory F. Caswell. Hennepin County Surwyar by. COUNTY RECORDER Hennepin County Minnesota I hereby cli that the within plot of JAS ADDITION TO EDINA was filed In this office this day of 199_ at — oNock -�— M. ' H. CunniR. County Auditor by Deputy EOAN, FME6 -- .eOWAK INC. 3 5229 232 5301 5301 5305 5313 5300 'C 5317 5321 5304 S 5325 ti G O LOCATION MAP O PINEWOOD I T5331 5315 5301 I W 5347 = 07 5400 0 5245 5241 54( NI 5252 5256 5260 5248 �QQ DR 5264 5405 54( 5400.40 5244 �O� Q' 5240 �\GN 5241 5245 5249 5253 5268 5408 5236 5237 5257 5412 5204 O� 5201 5232 5224 5433 5208 5220 5216 5212 5205 512 RICHWOOD 5209 5229 5225 5221 5217 5213 5405 5132 -34 5'• 5328 5324 5320 5376 5312 5308 5300 5208 5204 5200 5501 WINDSOR AVE NDSOR 5321 5317 5313 5309 5305 5233 RIC HWOOD DRIVE 05 5201 511'. 5509 W N O 5511 5520 U 55' W E 5524 5515 55. 5528 S` [55; 5532 5525 5236 5232 5228 5224 5220 5216 5212 5208 y � / SA_ o e� REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: VINCE BONGAARTS TRAFFIC SAFETY COORDINATOR Date: DECEMBER 21, 1999 . Subject: TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW OF DECEMBER 7, 1999 Agenda Item III.A. Consent ❑ Information Only F-1 o Mgr. Recommends 1:1 To HRA ® To Council Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion RECOMMENDATION: Approve Traffic Safety Staff Review of December 7, 1999. INFO/BACKGROUND: Mr. Mike Martin, 4905 Maple Road, may be in attendance to speak to Section B. 1, the denial of the request for 3 -way STOP signs at the "T" intersection of Maple Road and West 49`h Street. I 0 TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW TUESDAY, DECEMBER 7, 1999 The staff review of traffic safety matters occurred on December 7, 1999. Staff present included the Police Chief, the City Engineer, the Assistant City Engineer, the City Planner, the Traffic Safety Coordinator and the Public Works Traffic Control Specialist. From that review, the below recommendations are provided. On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and the staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They have also been informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, they can be included on the December 21, 1999, Council Agenda. SECTION A: Requests on which the staff recommends approval. 1. Request for a "Stop" sign westbound on Grove Street at Stuart Avenue. This is a 'T' type intersection with Stuart ending at Grove Street. There already are "Stop" signs for northbound Stuart Avenue and eastbound Grove Street at this intersection. This area has recently been enhanced with sidewalks connecting the area with Countryside School. The intersection is a designated school crossing area which is part of the defined walking route to Countryside School from the Wycliffe area north of Grove Street. The staff recommends the installation of a "Stop" sign for westbound Grove Street at Stuart Avenue as it is a designated school crossing for Countryside School. 2. Request for striping to designate right turn lane and left turn lane on eastbound Dewey Hill Road approaching the Cahill Road intersection. When approaching Cahill Road from eastbound Dewey Hill Road, traffic must turn either right or left due to an island dividing the intersection at this point. The marked turn lanes will better direct traffic into proper lanes for turning either north or south on Cahill Road. The staff recommends the striping of turn lanes for eastbound Dewey Hill Road at Cahill Road. TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW December 7, 1999 Page 2 3. In August of this year the staff received a request to install "No Parking Anytime" restrictions for either side of the driveway at 6328 Barrie Road to increase the visibility of drivers exiting that driveway. Due to a misunderstanding between the property manager, some of the residents who weren't informed of the changes and the traffic safety coordinator, the "No Parking Anytime" restrictions got extended further than they should have. The residents /owners at 6312 Barrie Road lost about four parking spaces on the street that they had for years. There is no accident history for this location: The staff in order to rectify this situation recommends that the "No Parking Anytime" restriction be extended only 15 feet on either side of the driveway at 6328 Barrie Road and the "No Parking" restrictions added in August extending further than 15 feet from the driveway be eliminated. SECTION B: Requests on which the staff recommends denial of request. 1. Request for 3 -way all way "Stop" signs at the 'T' intersection of Maple Road and W. 49th Street. The requestor's letter explaining his position along with a petition signed by 18 of the 38 homes in the 4800 and 4900 blocks of Maple Road are attached to this report. This area just recently added sidewalks. The requestor feels that the sloping feature of the sidewalk on the east side of Maple Road south of and approaching the W. 49th Street intersection, is a potential hazard for young children (please see attached letter). Maple Road south of. the W. 491h Street intersection has a daily average traffic of 950 vehicles. Maple Road north of the W. 49th Street intersection has a daily average traffic of 569 vehicles. W. 49th Street has a daily average traffic of 380 vehicles per day. This type of volume is not unusual in many areas of Edina that have been studied, i.e., Country Club, Parkwood Knolls, Cornelia School area, etc. Accident history shows one property damage accident occurring on 9/16/96 which involved one car hitting the fire hydrant. The 85 percentile speed for Maple Road is 29 mph TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW December 7, 1999 Page 3 Sidewalks with sloping grades to the intersection can be found throughout the metro area and don't seem to.cause any significant problems or hazards. Just to the east in southwest Minneapolis there are several streets with grades much steeper where the sidewalks run right to the intersection. "Stop" signs are not a guarantee that all vehicles will come to a stop, and if drivers feel the signs aren't warranted there is a good chance for abuse. "Stop" signs do not provide margins of safety for young children requiring training and supervision. The staff recommends denial of the request for "Stop" signs for lack of any warrants. 2. Request for "Stop" signs on Interlachen Boulevard at either Ridge Road or Prescott Circle to slow traffic on Interlachen Boulevard. The requestor feels that there is too much speed on Interlachen Boulevard and it creates a potential hazard for those living in this area. The requestor feels that "Stop" signs are needed somewhere between Green Farms Road and Schaefer Road which are both all -way stops. This is an area of no sidewalks, and lots of trees and brush right up to the edge of Interlachen Boulevard giving it a feeling of being a fairly narrow street. The daily average traffic is 1349 vehicles. The 85 percentile speed is 30 mph. There is no accident history in-this area. The staff recommends denial of the request for lack of warrants. 3. Request for "Stop" signs on Brittany Road at Roycar Road. This is a second request from this requestor. The previous request was in October, 1998. The requestor feels that the speed of the traffic on Brittany Road is a hazard to the children and other pedestrians. This is a 'T' type intersection with Brittany Road being the through street. There are no sidewalks in this area. The requestor says that the traffic from Christ Presbyterian Church are the main concerns especially the Tuesday morning traffic and other functions held at the church during the week. TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW December 7, 1999 Page 4 There is only one accident for this area since 1991. This occurred on 6/15/96 and was a one car accident with a utility pole. Traffic count and speed survey from 1998 showed a daily average traffic of 309 vehicles and an 85 percentile speed of 30 mph. This will be updated spring of 2000. The staff recommends denial for lack of warrants. A letter will be sent to the church administrator to advise them of the neighborhood concerns. SECTION C: Requests which are deferred to a later date or referred to others. A request for pedestrian's crosswalks at the intersection of W. 70th Street and Metro Boulevard. This is a very busy signalized intersection with no designated pedestrian crosswalks. Approximately 35 MTC buses have potential stops at this intersection. This includes 7 express buses and 28 regular route buses. Because of the intersection layout the southbound bus stops south of the intersection in the grass area (no sidewalks). The northbound buses stop also south of the intersection in an area with no sidewalks. Crosswalks are being requested for the south side of the intersection from the east to west side of Metro Boulevard, and also the west side of the intersection from the southwest corner to the northwest corner of the intersection. There are sidewalks on the north side of W. 70th Street. There are no sidewalks on the east side or west side of Metro Boulevard. The staff upon review is referring this to Engineering for transit - pedestrian access issues. O*A' City of Edina, Minnesota CITY COUNCIL 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Mionesota 55424 (612) 927 -8861 • (612) 927 - 7645 -FAX • (612) 927 - 5461 -TDD PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL ❑ SIDEWALK ❑ STORM SEWER ❑ ALLEY PAVING ❑ SANITARY SEWER DATE: NOV 01 79 R 9g VEO ❑ WA I ❑ STREE GH ❑ CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ❑ PERMANENT STREET MOTHER: Si0 P S i6►45 SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER To the Mayor and City Council: The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the locations listed below. 'y 5TREE P14t> MAP E ?oAD between 4$3S M A PLt 20AD- and 490 rii Q P LE 2o/-1D LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS CATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME between and between LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME between LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS ADDRESS ADDRESS and ADDRESS and ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE; THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNER'S SIGNATURE (PRINTED) PHONE 9 - /1�1�� w /�1.,�;►�gos n�a� -E r2�,� 9 UMkQ.6b4&V( � ,. wood k11 Cj1.?e/ 3- -Qr Q Z e XG--V-v( 4soz M�� -� -710 is petition was circulated by: f11 k1AEL k/. MA97�4 'qg05--1-y1APLE NAME ADDRESS PHONE There is space for more signatures on the back or you may attach extra pages.. SEPTEM13ER 1990 PROPERTY OWNER'S ONNrNER'S NAME SIGNA (PRINTED) PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNER'S PHO NE . 9�o - 90 y ii� ` ��1 � rJ'.0 �/1��•'�i/ " / Gt,L�i9a� ^,� � /�y / � /vim /� �J TO o wA �� 1 `�, t l� kkgplLw� �1ZC� -3323 ► 5 9 z�o - 16 � W \�L ►a-�n L� � �+��ce -r y9a5 M�t-.e �-d `�� " 3 85 :� MICHAEL W. MARTIN 4905 Maple Road Edina, MN. 55424 926 -8172 Email: mwmartin @imation.com October 19, 1999 Mayor Dennis Maetzold and City Council Members City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Dear Mayor Maetzold and City Council Members: I am submitting this letter to provide explanation in support of a Petition to - provide stop signs at the corner of 49th street and Maple Road in Edina. While the completion of the sidewalk along Maple Road has improved the overall safety for pedestrians, it has also produced a dangerous situation at the corner of 491h, street and Maple Road. The crossing point for pedestrians on the east side of Maple Road, across 49th street, is now focused at the location of the sidewalk producing a potential hazard for young children on foot, bicycle, roller blade, skate board and the like. Because the intersection of 49th Street and Maple Road has no stop signs, children crossing 49`h street along Maple Road are not given adequate protection from oncoming motorists. Furthermore, crossing 49th street while going North along the East Side of Maple Road is particularly hazardous due to the downward slope of the sidewalk to the 49th street intersection along and in front of the residence at 4901 Maple Road. This sloping feature in the sidewalk could cause a small child to lose control of a bicycle or other recreational device, sending them helplessly into the intersection. I have attached a photo of my child to illustrate this potential situation. It is our contention that properly place stop signs will insure that motorists pause and look for oncoming pedestrian traffic providing a better margin of safety for those crossing the intersection. We hope you will act favorably upon our request for stop signs at the corner of 49th street and Maple Road. Sincerely, Michael W. Martin Attachments: 1 cc: Vince Bongaarts aniChnl !. SfolePi 4824 Maple Road Edina. Nlinne�ota 55424 -1225 Phone(612)925 -0554 Fax (612) 925 -9634 Email M iStoleea aol.com. December 11, 1999 Dennis Maetzold, Mayor City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Maetzold: I have been informed that the petition urging stop signs for the Maple Road and W. 49th Street intersection has been placed on the City Council agenda for Tuesday, December 21. I regret very much that a previous commitment will make it impossible for me to be present in order to make an oral presentation in favor of stop signs. Please accept this letter as a substitute for my spoken appeal. Maple Road is still being used as a means for drivers to avoid the 50th and France intersection. Promised traffic signal coordination with Minneapolis either has not been accomplished or it has had no beneficial effect. Vehicles speed through this neighborhood at all hours of day and night, with the worst times being the morning and evening rush hours, the afternoon school dismissal time, and quitting time for the trades. I am sure that by now our street is carry ing more than 1,000 vehicles a day, and.many of these vehicles, are trucks trying to avoid 50th and France. Please do not make us wait until an unfortunate accident occurs here. We are in desperate - need of traffic control and we need it now. I hope that you will share this letter with your colleagues on the City Council. Bruce C. Blackwood 4901 Maple Road Edina, MN 55424 October 19, 1999 Mayor Dennis Maetzold and City Council Members City of Edina 4801 West 50`s Street Dear Mayor and City Council Members, I would like to submit this letter in accordance with a petition being submitted to the City regarding the installation of stop signs on the corner of 49a' and Maple Road in Edina. The addition of stop signs at this busy intersection. would give me a greater feeling of safety for my three elementary school children, as well as the multiple small children in the neighborhood. The recent addition of a sidewalk to the neighborhood is a tremendous improvement to keep pedestrian traffic off the streets, as well as provide children with a safer area to play, ride bikes, trikes, etc. However, further control of automobile traffic would significantly decrease risk of safety by controlling speed and creating a pause as driver's navigate the 49a' and Maple comer, thus allowing additional time to avoid children playing in the street. Thank you for your time. I look forward to you interest in this project. Sincerely, Bruce Blackood <:V o e REPORT /RECOMMENDATION lose To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item III. B From: Chief Michael Siitari Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Date: December 14, 1999 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Appeal of Administrative Action ® Motion Citation — City Code 900 (Furnish ❑Resolution Alcoholic Beverage to Person Under ' ❑ Ordinance 21) I-I Discussion Recommendation: Three day suspension of Rossini's license to serve alcoholic beverages pursuant to City Ordinances 900.10 and 160.16. Info /Background: June, 1999 — The City Manager directs the Police Department to create a monitoring and enforcement policy, to include an administrative penalty matrix, for the purpose of insuring compliance with state law and city code by establishments licensed to serve alcoholic beverages in the City of Edina. The policy is drafted, revised after input from the City Manager and the City Clerk, and finalized. The policy is then mailed to the managing officer of each licensed establishment. No undercover inspections of licensed establishments involving underage persons had been, conducted prior to this time. July 27, 1999 — Edina Police Department conducts undercover compliance checks of establishments licensed by the city to serve or sell alcoholic beverages. Rossini's employee Natalie Kokal serves a 17- year -old Police Explorer a glass of wine. Kokal did not ask for ID. Rossini's owner and manager Joan Donatelle is present and advised by officers of the violation. Kokal is charged by Edina City Prosecutor with Furnishing Alcoholic Beverage to Person Under 21, a gross misdemeanor. Rossini's receives an Administrative Citation and is fined $500 for a first violation. Rossini's pays the fine. November 12, 1999 — Edina Police Department again conducts undercover compliance checks throughout the city. Rossini's employee Chad Weltenberg serves a beer to a 20- year -old Metro State University student without checking ID. Joan Donatelle is again present as manager and is advised by officers of the violation. Criminal charges are pending against Weltenberg, and an Administrative Citation was issued on November 24th. The fine for a second violation is $1,000, as well as a three day suspension of the license to serve alcoholic beverages. Joan and David Donatelle have appealed the fine and the suspension of their license. Rossini's only other violation involved No Licensed Manager on Duty in 1997. In July of 1999, seventeen (17) of twenty nine (29) establishments in the City sold alcoholic beverages to persons under 21 years of age; only 41 % of alcohol retailers in Edina were in compliance with state law and city °code prohibiting such sales. July's was the first such compliance operation conducted by the police department since full liquor licenses were issued by the City in April of 1999. in November of 1999, seven (7) of twenty -nine (29) establishments sold alcoholic beverages to persons under 21. During this inspection period, 76% of alcohol retailers were in compliance, an increase of 35 %. C)' .l June 1, 1999 Dear Edina Beverage Alcohol Retailer: At the direction of the City Council, the Police Department has developed a plan for regular compliance checks done inside and outside licensed liquor sales outlets. , Uniform and plain clothes officers will be making frequent unannounced compliance checks. Underage decoys will be used at least twice in each license period per licensed business. Employee training, as well as knowledge and compliance with State law and City Code, are the responsibility of the license holder. Violations found will result in enforcement action which may include arrest, citation and administrative penalties as outlined on the attached Enforcement Schedule. Violations will result in more frequent inspections. *All licensed liquor sales outlets will be inspected including 3.2 beer on and off, sale, wine and full liquor. Providing for a safe and healthy environment in and around liquor sales establishments and controlling access to alcohol by underage people are of prime concern to the community and strict enforcement will be used to forward these goals. We hope you find this information useful and we thank you for your efforts to reduce youth access to alcohol in our community. Because we value your feedback, please call the Edina Police Department at (612)826- 1610 with any questions or comments and ask to speak to the Investigative Lieutenant. Sincerely, William C. Bernhjelm Chief of Police Edina Police Department t. t MONITORING AND ENFORCEMENT OF LICENSED LIQUOR SALES ESTABLISHMENTS ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTIES TYPE OF VIOLATION 1 st vio. 2nd vio. 3rd vio. 4th vio. 1. Commission, of a felony Revocation NA NA NA related to the licensed activity 2. Sale of alcoholic Revocation NA NA NA beverages while license is under suspension 3. Adult Entertainment Revocation NA NA NA 4. Sale of Intoxicating liquor Revocation NA NA NA where only license is for 3.2 percent malt liquor 5. Refusal °to allow City $1,000$2,000 Revocation NA inspectors or Police Fine Fine admission to inspect 3 day 7 day premises Suspension Suspension 6. Sale of alcoholic $500 $1,000 $2,000 Revocation beverages to under -age Fine 3 day 7 day person suspension suspension 7. After/before hours sale $500 $1,000 $2,000 o Revocation of alcoholic beverages Fine 3 day 7 day suspension suspension 8. After hours consumption $500 $1,000 $2,000 Revocation of alcoholic beverages Fine 3 day 7 day suspension suspension 9. Illegal gambling or $500 $1,000 $2,000 Revocation prostitution on premises Fine Fine Fine 3 day 7 day suspension suspension 10. Failure to take reasonable $500 $1,000 $2,000 Revocation steps to stop person from Fine 3 day 7 day leaving premises with suspension suspension alcoholic beverages fk O1 To: Mayor & City Council From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: December 21,1999 Subject: Change March 7 Meeting Date to March 6 REPORT/RECOMMENDATION Agenda Item # III.C. Consent Information Only Mgr. Recommends F-1 To HRA ® To Council Action ® Motion Resolution Ordinance Discussion Recommendation: Motion changing the City Council's first March meeting to Monday, March 6, 2000. Info/Background: M. S. 202A.14 sets the first Tuesday in March at 7:00 p.m. in every state general election year as the date for precinct caucuses throughout the State. No public meeting may be held after 6:00 p.m. on the day of a major political party precinct caucus. Therefore, we must change the date of our first March meeting from March 7 (caucus night) to Monday, March 6, 2000 at 7:00 p.m. To: Mayor & City Council From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: December 21,1999 Subject: Authorization of Finance Director to Make Transactions on Behalf of the City REPORT/RECOMMENDATION Agenda Item # III.D. Consent Information Only Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ® Motion El Resolution Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Adopt resolution authorizing John Wallin to sell, assign and endorse for transfer, certificates representing stocks, bonds or other securities on behalf of the City of Edina. Info/Background: John Wallin is occasionally asked to furnish a certification of his authorization to transact financial business on behalf of the City of Edina. The attached resolution formally gives him the necessary paper trail that financial institutions are seeking. RESOLUTION City of Edina BE IT RESOLVED THAT John Wallin, Finance Director of the City of Edina is hereby authorized to sell, assign and endorse for transfer, certificates representing stocks bonds, or other securities now registered or hereafter registered in the name of this municipal government. Adopted this 2151 day of December, 1999. Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) Dennis F. Maetzold; Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of December 21, 1999, and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this 22nd day of December, 1999. Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk City Hall (612) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 826 -0390 FnINA. MINNFSOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 826 -0379 t REPORURECOMMENDATION TO: Mayor & Council Members Agenda. Item : I I I. E. Recommendation: 1) That the Council select one of the following dates for the Annual Meeting in 2000 to be held at the Braemar Clubhouse at 5:00 PM: Thursday, March 16" Wednesday, March 22 "d Thursday, March 23' NOTE: The 1999 Annual Meeting was held at Centennial Lakes on Thursday, March 25`x. The location has been alternated between the two sites each year. FYI: Edina schools' 2000 spring break is the week beginning Monday, April 3'. Easter is April 23'd. It 2) That the Council select one of the following dates for the Volunteer Recognition Reception in 2000 to be held at Edinborough Park at 5:00 PM, or skip a year: Wednesday, April 19' Tuesday, April 25'b Wednesday, April 26' NOTE: The last Volunteer Recognition Reception was held on Tuesday, April 201', 1999, following the previous one held in 1997. The Council had decided to take a year off with the consideration of continuing a pattern of every other year. ❑ FROM: Susan Heiberg Consent Information Only F1 DATE: December 21,1999 ❑ Mgr. Recommends To HRA SUBJECT: SET DATES FOR COUNCIL'S ANNUAL MEETING & ❑X To Council VOLUNTEER RECOGNITION Action ® Motion o ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: 1) That the Council select one of the following dates for the Annual Meeting in 2000 to be held at the Braemar Clubhouse at 5:00 PM: Thursday, March 16" Wednesday, March 22 "d Thursday, March 23' NOTE: The 1999 Annual Meeting was held at Centennial Lakes on Thursday, March 25`x. The location has been alternated between the two sites each year. FYI: Edina schools' 2000 spring break is the week beginning Monday, April 3'. Easter is April 23'd. It 2) That the Council select one of the following dates for the Volunteer Recognition Reception in 2000 to be held at Edinborough Park at 5:00 PM, or skip a year: Wednesday, April 19' Tuesday, April 25'b Wednesday, April 26' NOTE: The last Volunteer Recognition Reception was held on Tuesday, April 201', 1999, following the previous one held in 1997. The Council had decided to take a year off with the consideration of continuing a pattern of every other year. o e �y ro ess REPORT /RECOMMENDATION TO: Mayor & City Council From: Francis J. Hoffma 6 City Engineer ineer. Date: 21 December, 1999 Subject: Cheyenne Circle Lift Station,. Contract 99 -1 (ENG) Change Order Recommendation: Agenda Item # III.F. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ® Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Approve change order for Great Western Corp. for additional excavation and grating for the lift station. Info /Background: Extra costs were incurred from having to "box" all the excavations (as opposed to open cut excavation), and hauling excess material off the site so that the street could be kept open to the public during construction. There was also an additional expense for the grating item. This change order would cause the total change orders to exceed 1'0% which is the staff approved limit. Change Order No. 3 is for $2,881.70 which brings the total contract price to $58,993.70 which is still under the basic contract of $59,125.00. Staff recommends approval of the change order. o e o REPORT /RECOMMENDATION • ��bRPOR�'T9 • lBBB To: Mayor & City Council. From: Francis J. Hoffma City Engineer Date: 21 December, 1999 Subject: Water Quality Video Report N '1 9 Agenda Item # ui.G. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ® Discussion Recommendation: Review video tape for information only. Info /Background: As part of our Utility Department water quality report ; a video was developed to augment the Federal requirement to send out an annual report. Staff would like to present this video during the meeting if time permits. P, 'A /SNA O e lase REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item: III. H. From: Craig Larsen Consent City Planner Information Only ❑ Date: December 21, 1999 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA = L ❑ To Council Subject: Year 2000 Consultant Action ® Motion Contract 1 -494 Corridor. ❑ Resolution Commission. LJR, Inc. ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: . Authorize execution by Mayor and Manager of contract between 1 -494 Corridor Commission and LJR, Inc., for calendar year 2000, Info /Background: The Commission's by -laws require the consent of member cities for consultant contracts. Funding for the contract comes from a federal CMAQ grant. ,A BLOOMINGTON • [DEN PRAIRIE • [DINA a MAPLE GROVE • MINNETONKA • PLYMOUTH • RICHFIELD 1494 CORRIDOR COMMISSION 8080 MitdxP Road • Eden Prairie MN 55344 • (612)699 -4428 • FAX 690 -4094 TO: Tom Foley, City of Richfield Larry Lee, City of Bloomington Craig Larsen, City of Edina Dave Lindahl, City of Eden Prairie FROM: Lisa.Raduenz, LJR, Inc., Consultant to I -494 Corridor Commission DATE: 11 /29/99. RE: LJR, Inc. Contract with 494 Corridor Commission, 1999 -2000 Enclosed please find a copy of the LJR, Inc. contract with the 494 Corridor Commission for the years 1999 -2000. This document was approved by the Corridor Commission at its October 13, 1999 meeting. _.,e original document is circulating among cities (currently it is at Minnetonka) for final signatures on the last pages. In order to speed up the signing process, the Commission requested a copy of the document to be mailed to each remaining city at its November 10" meeting. We hope to have the document placed on council meeting agendas or consent agendas for approval by the end of 1999. Once your Council has approved the contract, please wait for the the original document to be sent to you. When you receive it in the mail, please forward it on for signature to the City Manager and Mayor of your city and then pass it on accordingly as the attached memo notes. Should you have any questions, please give me a call at (651) 227 -1905. For clarification purposes, this document is not intended to discuss the participation of a community within the 494 Corridor Commission; rather,_ it is to corm the contractual agreement made in October 1999 between LJR, Inc., the Commission's consultant, and the 494 Corridor Commission itself. Agreement between the I -494 Corridor Commission and LJR, Inc. THIS AGREEMENT is made this 13' day of October, 1999, by and between the I -494 Corridor Commission, a joint powers agreement organization consisting of the Cities of Bloomington, Edina, Eden Prairie, Maple Grove, Minnetonka, Plymouth and Richfield, located at 8080 Mitchell Road, Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 (hereinafter referred to as the "Commission ") and LJR, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as the "Consultant"). Witnesseth WHEREAS, the access to a growing number of jobs and the mobility of residents . of the cities along I -494 could be affected by the growing congestion along portions of I- 494 and the disruption from the rebuilding of this freeway, and Whereas, the Cities of Bloomington, Edina, Eden Prairie, Maple Grove, Minnetonka, Plymouth, and Richfield have joined together to form a joint powers organization, the I -494 Corridor Commission, to develop a strategy that addresses the growing congestion on I -494, anticipates its reconstruction and the need to relate this rebuilding to efforts that increase the utilization of the existing highway capacity by encouraging employees to ride rather than drive alone to work, and WHEREAS, the Commission has applied for and received approval to spend Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) funds to plan, organize and implement a program of Travel Demand Management (TDM) along the I -494 corridor, and WHEREAS, the Commission desires to engage. the Consultant to perform the planning and TDM work. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms and conditions expressed herein, the parties agree as follows: 1 r NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms and conditions expressed herein, the parties agree as follows: I. Term of Agreement The term of this Agreement is January 1, 1999, through December 31, 2000, subject to termination as provided in Paragraph. V. II. Duties of Consultant A. The Consultant shall provide professional services in accordance, with this Agreement and the Management Plan (attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by reference herein). B. Consultant agrees to provide services in accordance with the highest professional standards in the performance of this Agreement. C. It is understood that Lisa Raduenz will act as Project Director. Any changes in staff members must be approved in writing by the Commission. D. The Consultant may subcontract some of its obligations under this contract to a third party, including the development and printing of marketing materials, communication plans, surveys, survey analysis and market research subject to written approval of the Commission. The Commission retains the right to disapprove any third -party contracts. Consent to any subcontract shall not relieve the Consultant of its primary responsibility for performance hereunder. E. The Consultant shall submit monthly progress reports in a format agreed to by the Commission that includes a narrative statement of progress on all work tasks identified in the Action/Management Plan, conformance to the project schedule for each of the tasks and monthly activities completed. 2 F. The Consultant shall submit monthly invoices that show the classification of pay, hours worked and total payments, including the same information. for subcontracts, if appropriate. The cost of all material and purchases charged under this Agreement shall be itemized. G. If the Commission requires a change in the scope of work described in Exhibit A, and in subsequent Action/Management Plans, the adjustment in time and compensation to the Consultant for performance of the work as modified shall be mutually- agreed upon by and between the parties to the Agreement. Such changes shall be effective only on the execution of written amendment(s) signed by the Consultant and the Commission. Such amendment(s) shall be incorporated as written amendments to this agreement. H. The Consultant agrees that the Consultant or anyone acting on behalf of the Consultant will apply with all federal, state and local laws, rules and regulations in performance of the services. I. The Consultant agrees that it presently has no interest and shall acquire no interest, direct or indirect, that would conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of its services hereunder. The Consultant further agrees that in the performance of the Agreement no person having any such interest shall be employed by the Consultant. The Consultant shall disclose to the Commission any contract, agreement or understanding that the Consultant has of the date of submission of the Agreement, or in the future may have, with any entity or individual which, in the Consultant's opinion, may represent a conflict of interest in the performance of the Consultant's duties for the Commission, and if the Commission determines that there is in fact a conflict, then the Consultant shall forthwith resign from such conflicting contract, agreement or understanding, in which event the Agreement shall remain in full 3 force and effect. In the event the Consultant does not resign, then the Commission shall have the option of terminating the Agreement. J. The Consultant shall not offer or provide gifts, favors, nor any other gratuities of more than nominal value to any official, employee or agent of the Commission during the period of this Agreement or for a period of one year thereafter. K. The Consultant agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Commission and the cities who are members of the Commission, their officials, employees and agents, from any and all claims, causes of action, lawsuits, damages, losses, or expenses, including attorney fees, arising from the performance of this Agreement by, the Consultant or the Consultant's agent and employees, provided that nay such claim, damage, loss or expense is attributable to bodily injury, sickness, diseases or death or to injury to or damage to, or loss of property by or resulting in any manner, from any acts or omissions of the Consultants, its subcontractors, agents or employees under this Agreement. L. It is agreed that nothing herein contained is intended or should be construed in any manner as creating or establishing the relationship of copartners between the parties hereto or as constituting the Consultant's staff as the agents, representatives or employees of the Commission for any purpose in any manner whatsoever. The Consultant and its staff are to be and shall remain an independent contractor with respect to all services performed under this Agreement. The Consultant also agrees that it has, or will secure at its own expense, all space, data processing, clerical and office support necessary to perform services under this Agreement except as the cities that are members of the Commission agree to provide space for occasional meetings or for limited work directly with the cities, employers, building managers or stakeholder groups in the corridor. Any and all personnel of the Consultant, n volunteers or other persons, while engaged in the performance of any work or services required by the Consultant under this Agreement, shall have no contractual relationship with the Commission and shall not be considered employees of the Commission or its member cities, and any and all claims that may or might arise under the Workers' Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota on behalf of said personnel or other persons while so engaged, and any and all claims whatsoever on behalf of any such person or personnel arising out of employment or alleged employment including, without limitation, claims of discrimination against the Consultant, its officers, agents, contractors or employees shall in no way be the responsibility of the Commission or its member cities, and the Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold the Commission, its officers, agents and employees harmless from any and all such claims regardless of any determination of any pertinent tribunal, agency, board, commission or court. Such personnel or other persons shall not be entitled to any compensation, rights or benefits of any kind whatsoever from the Commission or the member cities, including, without limitation, tenure rights, medical and hospital care, sick and vacation leave, Workers' Compensation, Unemployment Compensation, disability, severance pay and PERA. M. The Consultant agrees to obtain general comprehensive liability insurance in the amount of $1,000,000.00, and automobile liability insurance in the amount of $100,0005300,000, and provide certificates of said insurance to the Chair of the Commission. The Consultant agrees to maintain Workers' Compensation Insurance as provided in Minnesota Statutes, Section 176.181, subd. 2. The Consultant agrees to notify the Commission within five (5) working days of a change in the insurance provisions or termination of said insurance. 5 N. The parties hereto agree to comply with Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973/31 CFR Part 51. This Act states in part that, all recipients of federal funds, whether in. the form of a grant or a contract, review, and if necessary, modify, their. programs and activities so that discrimination based on handicap is eliminated." IIL Duties of the Commission A. The Commission shall pay the Consultant an amount not to exceed $219,316.18. This fee includes the cost of all consultants, materials, field supplies, photocopying, office space and equipment, supplies and secretarial service required to perform the work identified for the Consultant in the TDM Management Plan (Exhibit A). B. Payment shall be' made by the Commission within fifteen (15) days of receipt, verification and acceptance of a written itemized monthly invoice and two copies of the monthly progress report prepared by the Consultant. C. Compensation shall be based upon the rates and budget listed in Exhibit B. D. No member, officer, employee or agent of the Commission or of any member local public body during their tenure or for one (1) year thereafter, shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement or the proceeds thereof. 6 1 IV. Miscellaneous A. The books, records, correspondence, data, files, documents, and accounting procedures of the Consultant, relevant to this Agreement, are subject to examination by the Commission, the Metropolitan Council, the Minnesota Department of Transportation, and either the Legislative or State Auditor as appropriate, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 16B.06, Subd. 4. Consultant further agrees to allow the Commission or designated regional, state, or federal personnel to enter the Consultant's premises and to inspect, copy, and audit the above records, data and files. B. The Consultant shall retain all records pertinent to this Agreement for a minimum of three years after agreement completion or until audited by the Commission or the Metropolitan Council, except that if any litigation, claim or adverse finding exists, the records shall be retained until final disposition thereof has been resolved. C. This Agreement represents the entire Agreement between the Consultant and the Commission and supersedes and cancels any and all prior agreements or proposals, written or oral, between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof, and amendments, addenda, alterations or modifications to the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall be in writing and signed by both parties. D. This Agreement shall not be assignable without the written consent of the Commission. E. The Consultant agrees that the Commission will own and have right to use, reproduce and apply as it desires any data, reports, analyses, materials, finished and unfinished documents which are collected or developed by the 7 Consultant or anyone acting on behalf of the Consultant as a result of this Agreement. The Consultant further agrees that all reports, data, information and other work products prepared and developed under this Agreement shall be made available to the Commission and shall not.be published without the prior written approval of the Commission. The Commission agrees not to alter such work products and if the Commission uses the work products for a purpose not intended in this Agreement, the Commission will defend, hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant for any claims or damages that. result therefrom. F. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Minnesota. G. The Consultant agrees to comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13. H. The provisions of this Agreement shall supersede any conflicts between this Agreement and Exhibits A & B. V. Termination A. This Agreement, including any amendments thereto, may be terminated by the Commission and the Consultant at any time and for any reason by submitting written notice of termination to the other party at least thirty (30) days prior to the specified effective date of termination. In addition, the Commission shall have. the right to terminate this Agreement on ten (10) days' communicated written notice if the Consultant's performance is not timely, consistent with the schedule of activities set out in the attached Action/Management Plan (Exhibit A) or as amended by mutual agreement of the parties, or is substantially unsatisfactory or if the Consultant has violated any of the 8 covenants, agreements or stipulations of this Agreement. All finished and unfinished documents and work papers prepared by or for the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement shall, at the option of the Commission, become the property of the Commission, and the Consultant will be paid for services satisfactorily performed up to the date of termination. Notwithstanding the above, the Consultant shall not be relieved of liability to the Commission for damages sustained by the Commission by virtue of any breach of the Agreement by the Consultant. The Commission may withhold any payment to the Consultant for the purposes set forth until such time as the exact amount of damages due the Commission from the Consultant is determined. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set forth their hands on the day and year first written above. I -494 CORRIDOR COMMISSION LJR, INC. By: By: Its Chair Its: I -494 CORRIDOR COMMISSION By: Its Secretary- Treasurer CITY OF BLOOMINGTON CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE By: By. Its Mayor Its Mayor. CITY OF BLOOMINGTON Its City Manager 9 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE Its City Manager CITY OF EDINA By: Its Mayor CITY OF EDINA By: Its City Manager CITY OF MINNETONKA By: Its Mayor CITY OF MINNETONKA By: Its City Manager CITY OF RICHFIELD By: Its Mayor CITY OF RICHFIELD By: Its City Manager 10 CITY OF MAPLE GROVE By: Its Mayor CITY OF MAPLE GROVE By: Its City Manager CITY OF PLYMOUTH By: Its Mayor CITY OF PLYMOUTH By: Its City Manager �t CITY OF EDINA By: Its Mayor CITY OF EDINA By: Its City Manager CITY OF MINNETONKA By: Its Mayor CITY OF MINNETONKA By: Its City Manager CITY OF RICHFIELD By: Its Mayor CITY OF RICHFIELD By: Its City Manager 10 CITY OF MAPLE GROVE By: Its Mayor CITY OF MAPLE GROVE By: Its City Manager CITY OF PLYMOUTH By: Its Mayor CITY OF PLYMOUTH By: Its City Manager EXHIBIT B Exhibit B. I -494 Corridor Commission Contract Compensation Agreement I. Compensation A. The Consultant shall be paid an fixed fee per month not to exceed $9,138.17 from January 1, 1999 through December 31, 2000. This fee shall constitute full and complete payment for all of the expenses of the consultant related to this contract, including fringe benefits, all employee required insurances, and overhead expenses including office space, office furnishings, desks, chairs, file cabinet(s) and printer stand, computers and assorted necessary software, laser printer, fax machine, phone and modem, an answering machine or voicemail, postage for communications with the Commission, its cities, the Metropolitan Council and MN Department of Transportation related to this contract and a profit of fifteen percent (15 %) on all labor and fringe benefit costs. B. The Consultant shall be paid a monthly fee based on a flat rate for the TDM Administrator and the Project Director, their fringe benefits, a profit of fifteen percent (15 %) calculated on this labor and fringe benefit costs, and all other direct expenses noted in A, not to exceed $219,316.18 from January 1, 1999 through December 31, 2000. C. The Consultant shall submit monthly invoices and logs of all other expenses related to the contract, including the following: 1) Mileage for transportation from the St. Paul office to locations along I -494 or to other places in the Twin Cities where attendance at contract- related activity is required. Mileage reimbursement shall be calculated at the rate of thirty- two and one -half (.325) cents per mile. 2) Cost of a monthly phone charge for a dedicated line for I -494 into the office of the Consultant. 3) Marketing expenses related to the preparation and production of brochures, slide presentation, a regular newsletter and/or other . mateirals prepared to communicate and market TDM programs and services to employers, building managers, and employees; the preparation, production and analysis of surveys by a third party used to determine employees' trip behavior and possible use of an alternative, and the results of the TDM program. All third -party purchases and contracts must be noted in the monthly report in which the contract or purchase is made and further noted when payment is made for these services or products. 4) Other expenses. t ,1 EXHIBIT B II. PAYMENT A. The .CONSULTANT shall submit requests for payments to: Liz Berger City of Minnetonka 14600 Minnetonka Boulevard Minnetonka, MN 55345 B. Each request for payment shall reference this contract and the specific services identified in fee and reimbursement schedules and provisions and include a monthly status report. C. Terms of payment shall be fifteen (15) days upon receipt and acceptance of request for payment. 2 I PROPOSED BUDGET LJR, INC. January 1,1999- December 31, 2000 This budget is based on hourly rates for the Project Director and LJR clerical assistant that include labor and fringe benefit costs. Also included is an overhead rate expressed as a percentage and calculated as part of the total cost based on labor and fringe. In addition, a fixed fee of 15% based on labor and fringe is added. Two options are provided for choice of the I -494 Corridor Commission. Hourly rates Including labor and fringe benefit costs): Project Director: $ 42.75 Clerical Assistant: $ 20.75 Overhead rate expressed as a percentage based on labor and fringe: 27.65% Fixed fee expressed as a percentage based on labor and fringe: 15% Monthly phone expense (average): $38 /month Monthly mileage expense (average): $125 /month Project Director labor expense: 140 hours /month (total of 24 months): (3360 hours x $42.75) = 143,640.00 (Average of 35 hours /week) Clerical Assistant expense: 100 hours /month (total of 24 months): (Average of 25 hours /week) Overhead costs: Fixed fee: Phone: Mileage: Total Proposed Contract: (not -to- exceed) ALTERNATIVE OPTION (2): (2400 hours x $20.75) = 49,800.00 Twelve percent (12 %) flat fee discount over 24 months: Total flat fee contract, 24 month period: (flat monthly) $. 331627.93 $ 18,243.00 $ 912.00 $ 3.000.00 $ 249,222.93 $ (29,906.75) $ 219,316.18 $ 9,138.17 k, 1NA �1 oe 0 "rotes To: Mayor & City Council From: John Wallin Finance Director Date: December 21, 1999 Subject: Levy and Budget Adoption Hearing Recommendation: REPORT /RECOMMENDATION Agenda Item # IX.A. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ❑ Motion ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Adopt Resolution approving the budget for 2000 expenditures at $19,268,154.00 and the General Fund Property Tax Levy at $13,650,158.00 0 A. 0 e cn • fN�Meee� // To: Mayor & City Council From: John Wallin Finance Director Date: December 21, 1999 11 Subject: Fees and Charges i -REPORT/RECOMMENDATION Agenda Item # IX.B Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ® Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Discuss the proposed fees and charges to be adopted by ordinance. Approve ordinance and waive second reading. Info /Background: Attached are the following schedules for fees and charges proposed for 2000. The fees that are proposed to change from 1999 to 2000 are in bold. 1) Schedule of Fees and Charges for the General Fund and Utility Fund. The rates reflect an overall 3% increase as discussed during the budget assumption process. 2) Ordinance approved fees. Schedule of Fees and Charges for the General Fund Fee No. Page 1 Description 1999 Fee Permits 2000 Fee Fire Sprinkler Permit: 110 Sprinkler permit 50 -330 190 50 -330 118 Fire pump install 90 90 119 Standpipe install only 90 90 120 Each additional 10 10 Gas Pump, Tank & Burn: 95 -98 Special hazard 75-175 35 75-175 105 Grease vent 75 65 75 121 Fire alarm system - State Code 30 100 Fire exting system . .30 20 30 False Alarms: 6 125 Residential 300 300 126 Commercial 500 500 Planning - 85 Sign Permit 60 80 70 86 Bench courtesy 15 57 15 87 Sign variance - residential 125 125 88 Sign variance - commercial 250 250 Planning Fees: 160 NBR property owner $1 /owner 400 $1 /owner 180 Restricted parking 500 1 500 181 0 - 50 spaces 100 100 182 51 - 100 spaces 150 150 183 100 -200 spaces 250 250 184 Over 200 spaces 400 400. 192 -194 Rezoning 400-750 3 400-750 195 Retail sale in PID 300 1 300 196 Conditional use permit 500 1 500 199 Final developers plan 500 4 500 161 Lot division . 100 4 100 . 162 Subdivision 400 + $50 /lot 4 400 + $50 /lot 163 Developer fee /plan A 6.5% total cost 6.5% total cost 190 Residential variance 150 50 150 191 Commercial variance 250 3 250 25,198. Landscaping 100 10 100 197 Temporary conditional use 75 1 75 170 Vacation applications. 300 3 310 :230 Variance for RV storage 50 1 50 Resolution Compliance letters 100 40 100 Page 1 Schedule of Fees and Charges for the General Fund Fee No: Page 2 Description 1999 Fee Permits 2000 Fee Police /Clerk Massage & Amusement 1 Public dance 50 50 . 5 Lawful gambling 10 9 10 10 Mech amusement device location 60 7 15 11 Each machine 12 244 15 225 Loudspeaker permit 15 20 16 Commercial photography 290a Manager approve still 25 1 25 290b Manager approve motion 100 8 100 290c Council permit 300 300 265 Parking permit 3.50 /month 3.50 /month 266 Refund on sticker 3.50 /month 3.50 /month Manager Handgun carry permit 10 10 285 Business massage license 200 250 286 Individual massage license 70 30 72 286a Additional location 25 2 26 287 Investigation fee - indiv. license 70 12 70 288 Investigation fee - business license 1,500 1,500 289 Sexually oriented business 5,006 5,000 289a Investigation fee - sexually oriented 1,500. 1,500 291 Impounded vehicle as posted as posted Police 220 False alarm 105 510 105 . Dog & Impounding Fees: Impounding: 15 Daily care 16 100 16 16 First offense /year 35 140 35 17 Second offense /year 60 4 60 18 Third offense /year 110 1 110 19 Disposal 20 8 20 20 Dog license 26 100 26. 20 Neutered license 13 300 13 21 Dog license renewal 1 yr 12 12 21 Dog license renewal 1 yr neutered 9 9 21a Dog license renewal 2 yr 26 26 21a Dog license renewal 2 yr neutered 13 13 22 Duplicate license 6 10 6 23 Kennel license 55 55 24 Extra dog or cat 100 1 100 City Clerk Beer & Liquor 205 On -sale Club 675 2 675 206 On -sale Intoxicating liquor 11,000 2 11,000 207 Off -sale 3.2 Malt - new 319 24 329 208 Off -sale 3.2 Malt - renewal 252 1 260 209 On -sale 3.2 Malt - new 319 5 329 210 On -sale 3.2 Malt - renewal 252 260 On -Sale Wine: 211 50 or less seats 829 1 854 Page 2 Schedule of Fees and Charges for the General Fund Fee No. Description 1999 Fee Permits 2000 Fee 212 51 - 100 seats 910 4 928 213 101 - 150 seats 978 5 1,007 . 214 Over 150 seats 1,045 6 1,076 215 Temporary On -sale Intoxicating 50 per day 65 79 per day 216 Temporary On -sale 3.2 Malt 57 per event 1 59 per event 217 Sunday On -sale 200 200 218 Manager's License 77 79 261. Sidewalk cafe 530 546 290 Restrictive road permit 10 300 10 Health Pool, Spa and Garage 81 Indoor swimming pool 380 26 390 82 Outdoor swimming pool 205 31 210 83 Whirlpool 105 16 110 157 Parking garage license 35 100 35 158 Parking garage inspection 65 30 65 . 130 Sewage disposal system 30 30 Food & Soft Drinks: 1999 License structure See next page for 135 Food establishment 545 61 2000 Licensing 135 Manager certified 495 31 Structure. 135 Added facility 140 10 136 Day care limited food 170 14 137 Take out food 365 17 137 Manager certified 315 3 138 Packaged food 160 139 Food warehouse 90 140 Catering food establishment 545 6 140 Manager certified 495 1 140 Added facility 140 1 141 Itinerant food establishment 90 30 142 Retail candy shop 70 2 142 Additional facility 10 1 143 Potentially hazardous facility 110 4 144 Fleet of 5 or more 550 145 Catering vehicle 200 145 Added vehicle 45 146 Food vehicle 110 6 147 Fleet of 5 or more 550 147a Pushcart 160 1 148 Food vending, machine 15 200 150 Food establishment plan 100% license fee 149 Minimum fee 25 151 Food establishment plan remodel 50% license fee Hotel license 1999 License structure 155 50 or less rooms 270 1 155 Over 50 rooms $2 /added room 156 Boarding and lodging house 70 2 Page 3 Schedule of Fees and Charges for the General Fund Fee No. Description 1999 Fee Permits 2000 Fee Food & Soft Drinks: 2000 License structure 135 High risk establishment 475 475 136 Medium risk food establishment 48 300 137 Low risk food establishment 17 75 138 Base fee 147 100 139 Beer or wine table service 10 50 140 Alcohol table service. 12 100 141. Food vehicle 5 120 142 Additional facility 10 100 143 Pushcart 175 144 Itinerant food establishment 100 145 Food vending machine 200 15 150 Food establishment plan 100% license fee 100% license fee 149 Minimum fee 25 25 151 Food establishment plan remodel 50% license fee 50 %. license fee Hotel license 2000 License structure 153 Lodging establishment 100 $4 /room 154 Supervised group home 2 25 155 Boarding and lodging house license 1 75 Scavenger& Garbage: Collectors: 270 Garbage hauler 250 17 250 270 Added vehicle 75 64 75 280 Tobacco 270 .22 270 Building Building Permits: Building permit fee calculation 30 $0-$500 21 21 31 $501 - $2,000 $21 + 2.75 /add $ > $500 $21 + 2.75 /add $ > $500 32 $2,001 - $25,000 $62.25 + 12.50 /add $ > $2,000 $62.25 + 12.50 /add $ > $2,000 33 $25,001 - $50,000 $349.75 + 9.00 /add $ > $25,000 $349.75 + 9.00 /add $ > $25,000 34 $50,001 - $100,000 $574.75 + 6.25 /add $ > $50,000 $574.75 + 6.25 /add $ > $50,000 35 $100,001 - $500,000 $887.25 + 5.00 /add $ > $100,000 $887.25 + 5.00 /add $ > $100,000 36 $500,001 - $1,000,000 $2,887.25 + 4.25 /add $ > $500,000 $2,887.25 + 4.25 /add $ > $500,000 37 $1,000,000 & OVER $5,012.25 + 2.75 /add $ > $1,000,000 $5,012.25 + 2.75 /add $ > $1,000,000 37a Plan review 6.5% of permit fee 6.5% of permit fee 38 Reinspection 42 42 .Inspection for state license $42 /hr or total hourly $42 /hr or total hourly whichever is greater whichever is greater Page 4 • Schedule of Fees and Charges for the General Fund Fee No. Description 1999 Fee Permits 2000 Fee Code compliance inspection: 39 Residential 150. 150 40 Commercial 320 320 41 License surcharge 5 5 45 Moving of buildings. 212 212 46 Indemnity for damages 530 530 Street surface repair . 51 Under 10 square feet $25 /square foot $25 /square foot. 51a 10 - 25 square feet $20 /square foot $20 /square foot 51b . Over 25 square feet $17 /square foot $17 /square foot 50 Annual registration - Right of Way 200 200 50a Minimum permit fee 70 70 50b Per additional excavation (paved) 30 30 50c Per additional excavation (unpaved) 15 15 50d Underground util instal - tunneling $40/100 L.F. $40/100 L.F. 50e Underground util instal - trenching $55/100 L.F. $55/100 L.F. 50f Overhead utility installation $5/100 L.F. $5/100 L.F. 55 Installer's license 55 55 76 Water conditioner install 22 22 78 Surcharge for prohibited connection 100 /month 100 /month 165 Radio & TV antennas Building permit amount Building permit amount 175 Tree removal /grading Building permit amount. Building permit amount 176 Excavation /open pit Building permit amount Building permit amount 80 Pool construction Building permit amount Building permit amount 90 Parking ramp license 100 100 260 Curb cut 35 35 Plumbing: Minimum fee: 60 Residential 22 22 61 Commercial. 27 27 77 Testing RPZ backflow prevention 27 27 Fee calculation: 62 $0-$1,000 $16.00 + 3.10% > $500 $16.00 + 3.10% > $500 63 $1,001 - $5,000 $31.50 + 2.60% > $1,000 $31.50 + 2.60% > $1,000 64 $5,001 - $10,000 $135.50 + 2.15% > $5,000 $135.50 + 2.15% > $5,000 65 $10,001 - $25,000 $243.00 + 1.85% > $10,000 $243.00 + 1.85 % > $10,000 66 $25,001 - $50,000 $520.50 + 1.65% > $25,000 $520.50 + 1.65% > $25,000 67 $50,001 & over $933.00 + 1.30% > $50,000 $933.00 + 1.30% > $50,000 Page 5 Schedule of Fees and Charges for the General Fund Fee No. Description 1999 Fee Permits 2000 Fee Utilities Sewer rental charge: 235 Single family < 1600 cu. ft. 29.12 /quarter 29.12 /quarter 236 > 1600 cu. ft. 1.82/100 cu. ft. 1.82/100 cu. ft. 237 5 unit apts and greater 26.00 >4 or 1.82/100 cu. ft. 26.00 >4 or 1.82/100 cu. ft. 238 Comm'I & industrial bldgs 34 /water meter or 1.82/100 cu. ft. 34 /water meter or 1.82/100 cu. ft. 239 Industrial user strength Allocated by MWCC Allocated by MWCC 250 Service Availability Charge (SAC) 1,050 1,100 Water service: 243 East of Beard Ave. 1.64/100 cu. ft. 1.74/100 cu. ft. 243 Morningside area 1.64/100 cu. ft. 1.74/100 cu. ft. 242 All other areas .64/100 cu. ft. .66/100 cu. ft. 244 Excessive use charge .20/100 cu. ft. .21/100 cu. ft. Meter charge: 245 Up to 3/4" meter 7.78 /quarter .8.00 /quarter 245 1 "meter 10.56 /quarter 10.87 /quarter 245 1 1/4" meter 12.06 /quarter 12.42 /quarter 245 1 1/2" meter 13.57 /quarter 13.97 1quarter 245 2" meter 21.85 /quarter 22.50 /quarter 245 3" meter 82.90 /quarter 85.40 /quarter 245 4" meter 105.50 /quarter 108.70 /quarter Flat water charge: 246 Park dept/sprinkle /skate 2,500 2,500 247 Street dept flush 1,050 1,050 . 240 Curb water stops 12.50 each 12.50 each 241 Issue water meter Cost plus Cost plus 251 Connection charge 1,000 minimum 1,000 minimum 255 Storm water drainage 5.00 /quarter 5.00 /quarter Recycling 131 Single family 6.69 /quarter 6.69 /quarter 132 Double bungalow 6.69 /quarter 6.69 /quarter 133 Apts, condos 2 - 8 units 5.43 /quarter 5.43 /quarter Page 6 SCHEDULE2 ORDINANCE NO. 1999 -14 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. The following described fees of Schedule A to Code Section 185 are amended to read as follows: SECTION . SUBSEC. PURPOSE OF AMOUNT FEE FEEICHARGE :.:. NO : . 220 220.04 Machine or $15.00 annually per 10 amusement establishment, plus $15.00 per 11 device license machine 450 450.27 Subd 4 Public or semi- $390.00 per annum for each 81 public swimming pool enclosed part or all of the poollicense year $210.00 per annum for each 82 outdoor bath or pool 450 450.27 Subd 4 Public or semi- $110.00 per annum for each 83 public whirlpool bath of pool bath or therapeutic swimming pool license 460 460.06 Subd 1 Sin permit $70.00 85 721 721.03 Subd 1 Food High risk food - $475.00 135 establishment Med risk food - $300.00 136 Low risk food - $75.00 137 Base fee - $100.00 138 Beer or wine table svc - $50.00 139 Alcohol bar service - $100.00 140 Food vehicle - $120.00 141 Additional facility - $100.00 142 Pushcart - $175.00 143 Itinerant food - $100.00 144 Food vending machine - $15.00 145 735 735.03 Lodging est $4.00 /room 153 Supervised group home $25.00 154 Boarding & lodging house license $75.00 155 820 820.01 Filing of $310.00 170 application for vacation of street, alley or easement 900 900.07 Subd 1 Off -sale 3.2% New per year $329.00 207 malt liquor license Renewal per year $260.00 208 900 900.07 Subd 1 On -sale 3.20/0 New per year $329.00 209 malt liquor license Renewal per year $260.00 210 900 900.07 Subd 1 Wine license Per year- Restaurants with 50 or fewer seats $854.00 211 51 -100 seats inclusive $928.00 212 101 -150 seats inclusive $1007.00 213 Over 150 seats $1076.00 214 900 1900.07 1 Temporary on- Per event $59.00 1 216 SCHEDULE 2 - ORDINANCE NO. 1999 -14 PAGE 2 Section 2. The effective date of this Ordinance shall be January 1, 2000. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk sale 3.2% malt li uor license 900 900.07 Subd 1 Manager's license Per person/ per year $79.00 218 1040 1040.08 Loudspeaker $16.00 per permit 225 permit 1100 1100.03 Subd 2 Water service: 1. $0.66 per 100 cubic feet 242 for areas of City, except areas described below. 2. $1.74 per 100 cubic feet 243 for Morningside area and for east side of Beard Av. From W 541h St. to Fuller St and both sides of Abbott Pl. from W 54`h St. to Beard Av. 3. Excessive use 244 charge$.21 /100 cubic ft. Meter charge: Up to % inch meter - $8.00 qtr 245 1 inch meter - $10.87 qtr 1 % inch meter - $12.42 qtr 1 % inch meter - $13.97 qtr 2 inch meter - $22.50 qtr 3 inch meter - $85.40 qtr 4 inch meter - $108.70 qtr 1105 1105.01 Subd 1 Service $1100.00 per SAC unit x 250 Availability, number of SAC, units Charge (SAC) computed as pursuant to Subsection 1105.01, Subd. 1 of this Code 1230 1230.07 Sidewalk cafe $546.00 261 permit 1340 1340.06 Subd 1 Business license $250.00 for business license 285 for physical culture and. health service or club, reducing club or salon, sauna parlor, massage parlor or escort service 1340 1340.06 Subd 1 Massage therapist $72.00 286 or escort service individual license 1340 1340.06 Subd 1 Individual massage $26.00 Additional location 286a license Section 2. The effective date of this Ordinance shall be January 1, 2000. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk MINUTES EDINA RECYCLING AND SOLID WASTE COMMISSION OCTOBER 21, 1999 7:00 A.M. MANAGER'S CONFERENCE ROOM MEMBERS PRESENT: Inna Hays, Judith Smith, Kathy Frey, K.C. Glaser MEMBERS ABSENT: Shelly Lipetzky, Anne Cronin, Bob Reid, GUESTS: Paul Rosland and David Weidenfeller from BFI STAFF PRESENT: Solvei Wilmot ROLL CALL Meeting was called to order by Chair Kathy Frey, at 7:05 a.m MINUTES Judy Smith MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE SEPTEMBER 16 , 1999, MEETING. Irma Hays SECONDED. MOTION CARRIED. AMERICA RECYCLES DAY Ms. Wilmot stated that stands and pledge cards are available for distribution. Commission members volunteered to distribute the containers to: Edina and Southdale Library, High School, Jerry's, the two Middle Schools and Byerlys. Mr. Glaser volunteered to get information into the Edina Sun Newspaper and Ms. Wilmot will submit information to the Edina School District Office for submission in the school news paper as space is available. RECYCLING Ms. Wilmot stated that the contract rate for recycling collection has increased. However, the rate that will be charged to the residents will stay the same for 2000. The County grant will help subsidize the difference. Recycling collection will be changing to co- mingled and publicity in the Edina Sun along with inserts in the water bill are being prepared to inform the residents. Commission members suggested including Hennepin County's Problem Waste Drop -off center on the water bill insert. Ms. Wilmot reported that consideration is being given to changing the collection program in the year 2001. The change would be to have recycling collection as a subscription service. The residents of Edina would contract the recycling collection along with the refuse collection. The City would no longer hold the contract for recycling. Commission members expressed concern for the small hauler in Edina and how that would affect their service. Ms. Wilmot stated it would be possible for them to subcontract for recycling collection. Members also expressed concern regarding the recycling rates. Ms. Wilmot stated that residents would see a rate increase because the rate would not be subsidized. Instead the residents would receive a recycling credit on their water bills. The credit would be from monies received from the Hennepin County grant. ADJOURN Meeting adjourned at 7:50 a.m. MINUTES EDINA RECYCLING AND SOLID WASTE COMMISSION NOVEMBER 18, 1999 7:00 A.M. " MANAGER'S CONFERENCE ROOM MEMBERS PRESENT: Inna Hays, Judith Smith, Kathy Frey,. K.C. Glaser, Shelly Lipetzky, Anne Cronin, Bob Reid GUESTS: Paul Rosland from BFI STAFF PRESENT: Solvei Wilmot ROLL CALL Meeting was called to order by Chair Kathy Frey at 7:05 a.m. MINUTES Judy Smith MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE OCTOBER 21, 1999, MEETING. Inna Hayes SECONDED. MOTION CARRIED AMERICA RECYCLES DAY REPORT Ms. Wilmot commented that there had been an article in the Minneapolis Tribune on November 15, 1999 regarding America Recycles Day. Mr. Glaser stated he had written and submitted an article for the Edina Sun, however it did not get published. The pledge cards had been available at City Hall and there had been approximately 50 people that pledged to continue to recycle and buy recycled products. RECYCLING PUBLICITY Ms. Wilmot shared a copy of a brochure that is being put together to inform the residents about recycling changing from source separated to co- mingled. The brochure will be mailed with the water bills in January. RESIDENTIAL PROGRAM Ms. Wilmot stated that information is being gathered to consider a change in the residential collection program starting 2001. The change would be to switch to an open hauling or subscription service from the City held contract. The change would permit the residents to have more control over the service they receive. If the resident did not feel that they had been receiving good service they could switch to a different hauler. Currently, the residents have to let BFI collect their recyclables. Committee members expressed concerns regarding participation. Ms. Wilmot stated that the refuse haulers would be required to provide recycling collection before they would receive a license to work in Edina. Committee members expressed concern about the small haulers or those that collect in Edina because they don't have to provide recycling. Committee members also expressed concern about the recycling bin placement and enforcement with open hauling. Ms. Wilmot stated it would be handled as it is now. Mr. Rosland inquired. what kind of enforcement would be established for a hauler that collects recyclables but does not recycle them. Ms. Wilmot stated that issue would be looked into. It would probably be the process that is currently. being used. A committee member inquired what are the number of misses that currently occur. Mr. Rosland stated that last year there were 1.5 misses per day in Edina. For the next meeting Ms. Wilmot will bring information regarding open hauling and other communities. OTHER BUSINESS Ms. Wilmot stated that US West will have phone book drop -off bins available at Cub Foods again this year. Publicity will be submitted to the Edina Sun Newspaper to emphasis phone books may be placed in the household collection recycling bin. ADJOURN Meeting adjourned 7:50 a.m. LARRY L WARREN DL W650488488751 JANE N WARREN DL W650368636810 3139 LAFAYETTE RIDGE RD WAYZATA, MN 55391 E TH OF 2339 DATE /13 CC;- 17-2/910 116 DOLLARS [Mbank. 24Hour Banking 1-612-244-4646 FOR 1:09 10000 2 21: 1 lr3023LoSSB?0II@ 2439 )t 4 - x N jrD A<< Nk CLI N r )t 4 +'A EDINA PARK BOARD 7:30 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS NOVEMBER 9, 1999 MEMBERS PRESENT: Bill Jenkins, Dave Fredlund, George Klus, Karla Sitek, John Murrin, Chuck Mooty, Tom White MEMBERS ABSENT: Andrew Herring, Andrew Finsness, Floyd Grabiel, Linda Presthus STAFF PRESENT: John Keprios, Janet Canton, John Valliere OTHERS PRESENT: Bruce Carlson, Jude Dugan Olson I. APPROVAL OF THE OCTOBER 12, 1999 PARK BOARD MINUTES George Klus MOVED TO APPROVE THE OCTOBER 12, 1999 PARK BOARD MINUTES. Bill Jenkins SECONDED THE MOTION. MINUTES APPROVED. II. EDINA HOCKEY ASSOCIATION ADVERTISING PROPOSAL Mr. Keprios indicated that as his staff report points out the Edina Hockey Association (EHA) is requesting that they be able to venture into an advertising fundraiser. He noted that Mr. Bruce Carlson, President of EHA, has submitted a letter that outlines EHA's proposal. Mr. Keprios showed examples of what the ads would look like and indicated that Larry Thayer, manager of Braemar Ice Arena, gave the EHA permission to put advertising on the dashers on a temporary basis for a recent Bantam tournament. Mr. Carlson explained that the advertisements are clear decals that are 10' long by 30" high and stick right onto the boards. Mr. Jenkins asked which arenas would have the advertisements and Mr. Carlson replied they would be in the West and South arenas. This way the East arena is open for the Figure Skating Club to have the same opportunity. Mr. Keprios pointed out that some precedent has already been set in the arena with the advertising that was done for the hockey tournaments on a short-term basis. He also commented that the Edina Baseball Association has set some precedent because they have been advertising on the scoreboards at Courtney fields. Mr. Carlson commented that they use the same company that does the decals for Mariucci Arena, and it's a very high quality look. Mr. Keprios indicated that one question that came to his mind is the aesthetics. Also, he noted that the city is not doing this with the intent to make money but with the intent to be supportive much like we are with the concession stand for the Edina Hockey Parents. He noted, however, that the city does get a cut of the profits. Mr. Keprios'indicated that another issue of concern is to make sure that the East arena is set aside if the Figure Skating Club is interested in using advertising as a fundraiser. He explained that he did speak to the president of the Figure Skating Club and was told the issue would be discussed with their Board members, however, they are not sure if this is something they would be interested in. Mr. Keprios noted that the Figure Skating Club's concern is could the advertisements be taken down from the West arena when they have their figure skating show. He informed her that he did not have the answer. Mr. Carlson commented that once you remove the adhesive you have to redo them in which Mr. Keprios responded that, if necessary, they we could simply cover them up. Mr. Murrin asked if this has good revenue potential. Mr. Carlson explained that if they sold everything the gross revenue would be approximately $40,000 with net revenues of $26,500. The revenue sharing market appears to be 25% of the net revenue going to Braemar Arena, which would be $6,625 in this example. Mr. Keprios commented that this would be a great fundraising opportunity for the EHA. Mr. Mooty asked what is the approach as far as what's appropriate to have advertised.as well as the look and consistency of the advertising. Mr. Keprios explained that a few year ago he was asked to come up with a policy for advertising on city property. The policy included language that covers us so we are sure to stay away.from alcohol, tobacco and all of the other politically and culturally sensitive issues. The process is that it has to meet the city's approval and he will administratively handle that issue. Ms. Sitek explained that the graphic people suggest just using one word with their logo because that is what the people will see, as well as it makes less of a danger of coming up with inappropriate items. Mr. Mooty confinned that Mr. Keprios is saying that he will be giving the approval from the city's standpoint in which Mr. Keprios replied that is correct. He noted that if there is ever any question or issue he will run it through the process, however, he doesn't see there being a problem. Mr. Carlson indicated that he had a discussion with Mr. Thayer regarding the fact that the city has a deal with Coca -Cola and therefore we do need to offer them a dasher on each board if they want to pay for it. Mr. Mooty asked if the deal with Coca -Cola prohibits any tie with a competitor. Mr. Keprios noted that the contract arrangement is that we have so no other soft drink competitors could come into the city throughout the whole park system including the golf course. In return Coca -Cola gives us a lot of dollars up front to use for capital at those enterprise facilities, $80,000 to be exact. He noted that was part of the contract arrangement that if there was any advertising they would be it. Mr. Keprios stated that at one time Coca -Cola requested to advertise on a dasher board and we told them no. Mr. Murrin asked if it is legal to favor one competitor to the exclusivity of another. Mr. Keprios explained that we had an open bid process where other soft drink companies competed for the large contract, which resulted in tremendous savings for the city. He commented that not long ago Pepsi was the provider for the city. 2 Mr. Jenkins asked what is going to be done with the money that is made. Mr. Carlson replied that the additional resources will assist in keeping our program costs affordable to the youth hockey players in our community and help us to maintain the standards associated with administering the program. Mr. Jenkins asked how many participants are there in the program to which Mr. Carlson noted about 800. Primarily what they want to do is reduce or maintain registration fees and make it a more affordable experience. He also explained that what they do through capital improvements helps out the entire program and more times than not the High School as well. They put in a shooting cage a few years ago, they now have a furnished meeting room, video resources, coaching resources and an education program for coaches. He pointed out that they require all of their coaches to be certified even the assistant coaches which costs $35.00 to $40.00 per person and there are a lot of coaches. Jude Dugan Olson pointed out that they have one sponsor for each team and they are usually Edina businesses or parents who sponsor these teams. She noted that right now they have 35 community sponsors. She indicated that five of those sponsors have already indicated that they would be interested in this advertising fundraiser. Mr. Mooty asked if the hockey season is a full year as far as the hockey association is involved. Mr. Carlson responded that their season is basically November through the middle of March. However, there are kids who play hockey all year which is through other organizations and individuals. Mr. Mooty indicated that the reason he is asking is does the association really get the benefit for a full year. He noted that he doesn't see that to be a real problem but he thinks again it is setting a precedent for other activities that we get into where the beneficiary of it is not for the time that all of the activity is going on. This may have a potential to cause some more issues as we go into this endeavor. Mr. Mooty commented that he thinks it's a great way to capitalize and utilize whatever dollars we can get from outside to support it. Mr. Carlson suggested taking it one year at a time and see how it goes. Mr. Mooty replied he thinks that is the approach we are going to have to take. It should be done on an annual basis. Mr. Carlson indicated that maybe it would make sense to make the contract 6 to 8 months. Mr. Mooty noted that he doesn't know if you would lose much by saying it's for the season, but again you could try it and see what happens. George Klus MOVED THAT WE APPROVE THE EDINA HOCKEY ASSOCIATION ADVERTISING PROPOSAL FOR THE PERIOD OF DECEMBER .1 sT,1999 THROUGH NOVEMBER 30, 2000. Mr. White noted that Mr. Keprios had mentioned in his proposal that the motion needs to be contingent on the Figure Skating Club. Mr. Keprios replied that he wanted them to have their day in court if they are interested and believes they have been informed and will continue to have an opportunity to 'participate. Mr. Klus stated that the EHA is only asking for the West and South arenas. John MURRIN SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 3 III. BRAEMAR &FRED RICHARDS GOLF COURSES PRESENTATION - JOHN VALLIERE Mr. Keprios indicated that John Valliere, manager of the golf courses, will give a brief presentation to inform the Park Board about Braemar and Fred Richards golf courses. He will discuss the history, mission, philosophy and. general operations of the golf courses. Mr. Keprios commented that the finances were already discussed at the October meeting and therefore the focus will be more on the philosophy and operations. Mr. Valliere indicated that he would first like to start off with the history of the Braemar Golf Course. He explained that the golf course was built in 1963 and opened in 1964, therefore, the city manager at that time decided that the address should be 6364 Dewey Hill Road. The address is now 6364 John Harris Drive in honor of John Harris who is an Edina resident who won the US National Amateur in 1993. The city wanted to recognize him and that is why it was renamed. Mr. Valliere stated that Braemar has hosted a lot of national tournaments as well as state tournaments and there have been a lot of good reviews. Mr. Valliere pointed out that Braemar also prides itself with the outstanding lesson programs that are offered. He indicated that Braemar has seven PGA instructors who are renowned in the state. There are group lessons and individual lessons offered for both juniors and adults. He explained that they introduce people to the game and hopefully get them involved so they stay with the game. Mr. Valliere indicated that the patron card was already in place when he started working at Braemar Golf Course in 1969. He explained that the patron card is a card that gives people who live in the community first access to the course as well as it gives them a reduction in the green fees. He noted that he feels the patron card has created customer loyalty and the desire for them to get into leagues. It's almost like a community within a community at Braemar. He commented that there are some people who have played golf together for 30 years. Mr. Valliere stated that the golf dome has been very profitable. He explained that the dome started out as a privately owned facility on public land and they were paying the city rent. The golf dome didn't turn the corner as quickly as the previous owners wanted and subsequently the city bought it. Mr. Valliere commented that with the staff's efforts it has become a very profitable venture for the city. However, right now it is starting to have more competition because there are more and more inflatable domes being built in the metropolitan area. Mr. Valliere pointed out that there are 45 holes total and they take a lot of maintenance. He indicated that there are approximately 130 to 140 people who work at the golf courses in the summer. He then noted that the question he always gets asked is what do we do during the winter. Mr. Valliere explained that in the summer they start at 6:00 a.m. and are usually still there until 10:00 p.m. Therefore, his staff is run ragged especially when 4 the seasonal help is gone and the weather is still nice outside. Mr. White asked if the golf courses are still open to which Valliere replied yes they are. Mr. Valliere noted that there are 12 full -time people who work for the golf courses and 8 of them work on maintenance. He indicated that because there are so many seasonal people, training and wages can be a problem because they are only there for 90 days. However, the majority of his seasonal staff do a good job and have a good work ethic and care about the facility. Mr. Valliere pointed out that a lot of improvements have been made over the years with the driving range, executive course and so on. He noted that they are always trying to meet the needs of the community as it grows. Mr. Valliere explained that when the golf course first opened up in the 1960's there were 350 patron card holders. In the late 1970's there were 900 to 1,100 patron cards sold. In the late 1980's there were 1,800 patron cards sold to which we could not accommodate everyone on the regulation 18 hole course. Therefore, it became necessary to expand and now meets the needs of the community. This year there were 2,650 patron cards sold. However, it's still a challenge because the new nine hasn't been tremendously received by the larger portion of clientele which are seniors. The reason is because there are climbs involved which needed to be there because of stipulations from the Corps of Engineers. He indicated that they are hoping that they can somehow soften the golf course and make it a little more receptive. This is something that will definitely have to be addressed in the future. Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that Mr. Valliere does a tremendous job with the golf courses. It's not just a summer operation but it's a twelve month operation with the golf dome, banquet facilities, grill area and maintenance. There is a great staff out there and Mr. Valliere and his staff deserve a lot of credit. Mr. Fredlund asked Mr. Valliere if there have been any ideas on softening the golf course. Mr. Valliere replied there have been a couple of architects who have looked at it but there have not been any permanent plans drawn up. He noted that now that some time has gone by maybe they can approach the Corps of Engineers with a new routing plan so that we can soften the course. Mr. Keprios added that Mr. Valliere has an excellent goose management program at Braemar. He noted that the golf course has had a dog living there for the last three years and it has done a wonderful job. IV. COMMUNITY EDUCATION SERVICES REPORT - LINDA PRESTHUS Ms. Presthus was not at the Park Board meeting but Mr. Keprios commented that he attended the most recent Community Education Services Meeting where they discussed putting together a generic joint publicity piece. He explained that Park and Recreation will be putting in about 2 % pages of our basic program service offerings and who to contact. As more progress is made on this issue Ms. Presthus and himself will keep the Park Board up -to -date. 5 Mr. Murrin informed the Park Board that the School Board just finished their election and Colleen Feige, Peyton Robb and Maureen Andrew- Knudsen will be the new School Board members. He noted that they are looking forward to the new group but that they are also losing some good people. V. COMMUNITY CENTER STUDY UPDATE - CHUCK MOOTY Mr. Mooty indicated that he has been meeting every two to three weeks with the various people who have been involved in this process. These are people from the school board, city and outside experts who are in the fields of engineering and architecture. He explained that currently they are trying to get a better sense of what the costs are going to be for the project. Mr. Mooty stated that the concept is basically to revitalize the whole community center area which includes improvements to the football and soccer facilities. Currently they are looking into the different types of turf in order to get the maximum utilization of that space. They are also looking at trying to enhance the baseball field. Mr. Mooty indicated that they are also looking at adding on to the field house three basketball courts on the south side of the community center. Mr. Jenkins asked Mr. Mooty if this is a task force that he is on and asked who put the committee together. Mr. Mooty replied that basically Ken Dragseth and Gordon Hughes have put this committee together. Mr. Jenkins asked Mr. Mooty if he is on the committee irrespective of his position on the Park Board. Mr. Mooty noted that he is on this committee because he has been a big proponent of trying to enhance the different facilities and therefore was asked to be part of the committee. This way the Park Board is also part of it. Mr. Mooty indicated that he feels everything is progressing and right now they are trying to prioritize because of the dollars, it's not going to be cheap. We need to figure out what are the critical items and then try to finalize the overall improvements. Mr. Mooty stated that there are also other things such as the theatre improvements and parking enhancements. Mr. Jenkins asked if those plans are firmed up a little bit with the finalization of the Lewis site. Mr. Mooty responded that things will start moving more now that they've made that decision. Mr. Jenkins stated that he thought there was some talk about putting gymnasiums on that site. Mr. Mooty replied at one time there was but when the WEMEP proposal got turned down so did the gymnasiums. He indicated that potentially gymnasiums could be put there, however, it makes the most economic sense to keep everything together and not separate it further out. Mr. Mooty noted that the goal is to have the referendum take place in May. Mr. Keprios indicated that he received the latest numbers and it's not going to be a cheap venture, however, it is one that is very important and we need to pursue it and see what type of response there is because it's important for the community. R ?c Mr. Jenkins asked have they finalized the components that are going into the bid. Mr. Mooty replied that all of the components have been identified but because there are so many things there is a basic core of items. Mr. Jenkins asked what are the core items. Mr. Mooty noted that it is basically the field house with three gymnasiums. Mr. Jenkins asked if that is enough to which Mr. Mooty replied three are not enough. Mr. Jenkins asked why don't you do four. Mr. Mooty commented that four is one of the options with the concept of adding one gymnasium onto Concord because from an enrollment standpoint they have been the ballooning elementary school. Mr. Mooty stated that according to the experts the issue with four is the economics, it turned out better to do three and splitting the fourth gymnasium somewhere else. The three gymnasiums will be side by side with basically net dividers because of the cost. Therefore, the core will be the field house, locker room improvements, some remodeling of Concord, South View. and the Community Center gymnasiums as well as remodeling of the theatre. There will be new facilities for the football stadium. Mr. Mooty went on to say that the two tennis courts may be moved up to where the other tennis courts are and ultimately may be lighted. Mr. Jenkins asked if all of this will be district maintained to which Mr. Mooty replied yes. Mr. Jenkins asked how much are they looking at to which Mr. Mooty replied it currently is in the 15 plus million. Mr. Murrin asked if this includes what is being done at the Kunz -Lewis site with the senior center and library. Mr. Mooty commented that will be a separate deal. Ms. Sitek asked who is going to say what the referendum is for and how is this going to be sold to the public. Mr. Mooty replied that both the school and city will be selling this referendum and will be saying it is for enhancements for the school district as well as the city. He indicated that the city will have the up front dollars and the school district will take care of the ongoing maintenance. Ms. Sitek noted that she feels a lot of people will say didn't you recently ask for everything you needed. Mr. Jenkins stated that he would like to bring up the bidding process and noted to make sure the numbers are correct and you don't end up short like we did for the Park Bond. You have to spend money to figure out what it's going to cost, you can't just guess. Mr. Mooty commented that he agrees. Mr. Keprios pointed out that at the last meeting all of the numbers were laid out. If such and such was done it would cost a certain amount and if other things were done it would cost this amount. Every scenario imaginable was discussed. A lot of comments were thrown out as to what makes financial sense and what doesn't. Therefore, like Mr. Mooty mentioned, we are down to three gymnasiums and a track up above and those kinds of things. Mr. Keprios stated that where it stands today is both Ken Dragseth and Gordon Hughes are cooperatively drafting a memo to the elected officials (school board and city council) to request a joint meeting to answer all of the tough questions. He pointed out that there are a lot of questions that still need to be answered and ultimately thinks that some of this will come before the Park Board. Mr. Keprios commented that he would like to go back to what was discussed earlier regarding Mr. Mooty serving on the committee. He indicated that Mr. Mooty is being a VA �i little bit humble in that his participation with this group is far more than just an interested party. Mr. Mooty is really leading the charge, very respectfully, on the gymnasium side of life and if it wasn't for him this may not even be on the docket. Mr. Murrin commented that he knows the school district has invested a lot of time and effort in this and also feels that if it wasn't for Mr. Mooty this whole thing wouldn't really be going on. He stated that he thinks this has been well thought out and the people -- - who are working on this are doing a great job. VI. OTHER A. Donation Policy - Mr. Klus asked Mr. Keprios if once in a while he could put in his staff report who has donated what so that the Park Board is aware of who has donated money. Mr. Keprios replied that he is working on updating his donation list so that it is current to where we are at. When this is completed he will make sure the Park Board receives the information. B. EGAA Scholarship - Mr. Jenkins indicated that he read in EGAA's minutes that they offer scholarships and asked what kind of scholarships they are. Mr. Keprios replied they are $500.00 scholarships for college and they have been doing it for years. C. Referendum - Mr. White stated that he has already discussed briefly with Mr. Keprios to have staff identify capital issues to see if we should pursue a referendum in May. Mr. Jenkins indicated that he feels capital issues for Park and Recreation should be coming out of the annual city budget. We should be receiving $180,000 to $200,000 every year from the city to address these capital needs. Mr. Keprios commented that Mr. Herring did a wonderful job representing the Park Board on the capital budget. He went before the City Council during the budget hearing process and indicated that the Park and Recreation Department's number one issue is that we need a capital plan and need it right now. Mr. Herring informed the City Council that it doesn't serve the community well to let things go and then try to fix it all at once. Mr. Keprios stated that Mr. Herring did a fine job, kept it very positive and to the point and was well received. However, in response to what Mr. White has said there are a few large ticket items that might be appropriate to include in the referendum because certain projects would have to wait forever under a capital plan. Mr. White asked Mr. Keprios to have a report regarding this at the next Park Board meeting. D. Julia Bertrand - Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that Julia Bertrand, Recreation Supervisor, will be leaving the department. Her last day will be November 2961. He noted that Ms. Bertrand has been with the city for 5 years and has done a great job. However, she has decided to stay home and be a full -time Mom. Mr. Keprios indicated that they have replaced her with Donna Tilsner who will start with the city on November 22 "d. He indicated that Ms. Tilsner is an Edina resident who has worked in Park and Recreation for over 22 years and currently works for the City of Eagan. She is wonderful and he is sure she will do a fabulous job for us. 0 I E. Wooddale Comfort Station - Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that the City Council has approved to go forward with the Wooddale Comfort Station. F. Hennepin County Parks - Mr. Keprios indicated that Hennepin County has pulled together a lot of first and second ring suburbs who have made an issue with Hennepin County and he has been part of several meetings with them. Mr. Keprios explained that - - when Hennepin - Parks -were first formed by the legislature a lot of suburbs like Edina had already formed their own park system. Therefore, in Edina we have 1,553 acres of park land, all city owned. There is no county, state or federal park land in Edina. Mr. Keprios noted that some people have been complaining that they pay a lot of taxes to the county but don't get the benefit, they have to drive in order to get a benefit from their county tax dollar. He stated that they are currently trying to get some benefit into the first ring suburbs where maybe there is some land that could be county land. Also, possibly take it a step further and have a consorted effort to have a regional trail system that upgrades some of our trails to connect to some of the major regional corridors. Hennepin County has already identified that if the Canadian Pacific Railroad here in Edina were to ever get abandoned there is already a process in place to make that corridor a wonderful trail system. Mr. Keprios explained that he suggested the possibility to Hennepin County that they may want to consider purchasing Bredesen Park. He noted that it would have restrictions such as they give the city tons of money, it always has to remain park land for natural purposes and they maintain it on their nickel. Also, if it were to ever go to anything other than parkland it goes back to the ownership of the city. Mr. Keprios also pointed out that they would have the funding to do some naturalist programs and possibly build a small nature center. Mr. Keprios stated that he doesn't know how they are going to respond to this but he thought he would suggest it to them since they asked. Mr. Jenkins asked is Hennepin County Parks driving this in which Mr. Keprios responded that is correct. Mr. Jenkins also asked what is Hennepin County getting out of this deal. Mr. Keprios replied they would add it to their park system and also commented that Hennepin County has a lot of money because they are not strapped with levy limits like we are. He stated that the Park Board will be hearing more about this as we go down the road. VII. ADJOURNMENT Karla Sitek MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 8:55 P.M. George Klus SECONDED THE MOTION. MEETING ADJOURNED. 0J i x%13 Mr. Andy. Hemng, Chair Edina Park-and Recreation Board City of Edina 4801 West 50' Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Andy: November 7, 1999 I am the incoming president of the Braemar Men's Club, a group of 375 Edina residents who are committed to playing golf regularly at the Braemar Golf Course. I have heard that the Park and Recreation Board is discussing the feasibility of transferring the golf course's operating surplus to support the capital plans of the Park and Recreation Board. There are three reasons why I conclude that this strategy is not in the best interests of the community. First, you are discouraging Edina residents from utilizing a community asset that `theoretically' was developed for Edina residents. Edina seniors, myself included, seek out other golf courses of comparable quality that offer golf at a more reasonable price. For example, I have played at three other courses this past summer for $21, $23 and $25 that includes both the costs of an electric cart and 18 holes. Yet, I hear that there is board discussion about raising the cost of golf at Braemar because "it is such a great deal" and then use the excess surplus to fund capital improvements in other sectors of the community. Secondly, I view this "cost shifting" strategy as similar to the approach government uses to fund health care. Medicare and Medicaid do not reimburse the health care system adequately for care delivered. Consequently, the health care system shifts these costs to the private sector so that you and your employer annually experience a higher annual increase in your policy premium than you deserve....a hidden form of taxation. The politicians are unwilling to deal with the real cost of the benefits they offer seniors and the poor, place artificial caps and shift the cost to the private sector. Your consideration of taking some of the operating surplus from the golf course's operations is cost shifting. It will result in either fewer improvements to the golf course and/or price increases. This cost shifting is from seniors with fixed incomes to younger families with children who are experiencing annual raises at their. place of employment. The assumption underlying this claim of cost shifting from seniors to younger residents is that a disproportionate number of seniors with fixed incomes use the golf course and that mostly younger families with children use the park system. Finally, the citizens of Edina generously approved your bond referendum just a few years ago. You, not we, decided on the amount of money that you needed to upgrade the park system. We continue to assume you requested and received adequate funds to satisfy the capital needs of the park system for a significant period of time. I believe that the patron card and the cost of golf at Braemar should be a great deal for Edina citizens and it is your responsibility and privilege to assure that occurs. _ Sincerely, J. Paul O'Connor 4604 Gilford Drive, Edina, MN 55435 Cc: Bill Jenkins and John Keprios Uniprise A UnitedHealth Group Company Uniprise A UnitedHealth Group Co W1080 -1000 2725 Mall Drive Eau Claire WI 54701 Tel 715 858 2200 Fax 715 858 2325 December 10, 1999 Dennis Maetzold, Mayor City of Edina 4801 W 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Maetzold: am writing to notify you that there will be a layoff at United Health Group in the . Medicare /Medicaid billing and enrollment office. The Medicare /Medicaid billing and enrollment office is located at 5901 Lincoln Drive, Edina, MN. The date of the layoff is February 11, 2000. The layoff is expected to be permanent. There will be 72 employees who will be affected by this layoff. The expected date of the first separation is February 11, 2000. There is no union representing the employees and bumping rights do not apply. If you would like additional information about the layoff please contact meat (715) 858- 2492. Sincerely, Deb Gehrke Human Resource Manager November 29, 1999 Chief Marty Scheerer Edina Fire Department 625 Tracy Avenue Edina, Minnesota 55436 Dear Chief Scheerer: I am writing to express my appreciation for the Edina Fire Department's participation in the 1999 Seat Belt Challenge, a four -week program designed to increase seat belt use among high school students. As you know, Tom Schmitz acted as a Community Partner for the program. Community Partners serve as the liaison between the Community Health Department and high schools throughout Hennepin County. They are instrumental in introducing the program to schools, recruiting their involvement and then working with students to conduct a successful buckle up campaign. Due in part to Tom's efforts, Edina High School participated in the program, and increased belt use by 9% among students. The Seat Belt Challenge demonstrates the power of community collaboration. The Community Health Department, high schools, businesses, and partnering agencies such as yours each have a stake in motor vehicle safety among teenagers. Yet none of us could implement the program on our own. Together, we. enticed 14 schools to act on this issue, exposed over 2000 young people to multiple seat belt messages, and gained media attention for the program. Most importantly, we increased teenage seat belt use by 11%. We are so grateful to Tom and the Edina Fire Department for partnering with us to promote teen safety and we look forward to ongoing collaboration. Sincerely, Sue Zuide a Director, Community Health Department Cc: Tom Schmitz Hennepin County Community Health Department Health Promotion Division Recycled Paper 525 Portland Avenue Mail Code 968 Minneapolis, MN 55415 -1569 (612) 348 -5618 4 811 FAIRVIEW ' Fairview Southdale Hospital 6401 France Avenue South Edina, MN 55435 -2199 Tel 612- 924 -5000 December 13, 1999 Dennis Maetzold Mayor, City of Edina 4810 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor: I wanted to share with you a wonderful letter that we recently received from a former patient at Fairview Southdale Hospital who lives in Edina. This 39- year -old woman was near sudden death, but was saved with the great effort of the Edina police, paramedics, and the hospital staff. This is an example of the community benefit from the great skills of our staffs. Sincerely, 6'�c — Ma M. Enger Senior Vice President and Adminstrator MME /bb enclosure `r IJF I1 -23 -99 Dear Do tti'e,, 1"ha.nkG9lvin3 is on y a-Pecu days awa y and I CouJdn't (et- tie hob'day Pass by W1 tho wt ex p ress i n9 rn y h eart•Fett t%arksto rcu rvi eU) for the tremend o u,,s cart. I received -kh ere Last sPr;,n9. M y dam 113 ka5 rn uM to ae.Le -brate -bh i 5 Than "q v,' n9 . St was six rho nt1,5 a.g o. +oday Cm" Z3) -Ehat T experienced my Sudden card i az death . -Me, d c-F, bri bLa -tor -shot was prewt in the p o Lice SCLua.d Car-, kndou.btedly played a. rnuJor rote, in my Survival, A-6 T u.nder6+z nd, yow had aLot +o d o i n m a.let n� th at h app en an d Z -bha de you.. P Leas e s h are, mg 9 rah'tude w i�+ -bh e, t5rn erg e-r icy R o o m , I C LL CLnd CCU. 5+ aLP-f's . My fa^ i' 1, KO-6 o -Pt-etn re rnrn a.r lZed, cl u.ri n 9 the Pas+ M orL7 hs, ho' Car l n q artir' -- ,rvLpaSS toucte, everyone wcts . -Ilicy have, wo r, -rPW 6ivri er to -&--a of -L-hc� ER 5 +aff who Cam c to ah eck, o n me la.+r r 1 n the cla3 or the n WSe who Sera- two beonie- babes home--fbr my girL6 or -thenuxSc Who joined my morn at my u,n pred i Viable ►ti��. '. wi 5 h Z knew Peop&5, name-5 or Could thanle each Per5oa, Wiio '• f2no� each, Cared -fir rh c; i nd i v�d uakl,� . p&r50rL WaS sirnply•-dolnq his - /.herjob, but. 2 Want +kern to tr)oLz at t4ei r k-ind W o rd5 and Warm to u thes m dan+ -to our -Fa,mi L- God P .laced' maxis u7ondcrRd pe;opL, : Cn, m;y °paw. ato M.3' 1 1,4r-,s j o urney. Az -the: ho U'd ".5 a.pproach,, I Z ze over and over, .9a,tv -bha+ every day is a to. ,b e. -trews u.re d.. you. w i lt,, more 9� 12e,1 b� rreaol n � h is when the -CLtrke4 has -turned to l,e;Ptovcr5, but please: Know -+-hat when my famtlY St-Es docan -la d in.ne.r on eThursday, we w' Lt bt aou.n- n9 J= u rvCeW and tf� c+7A� among our m&ny b Less Ln96 . Warm l , Laura Ped emon, _� 1 !: � "u'V s �+ �� ,k� �'. � � �_ *r, � �.. . '• a �al � �� f , -; • �:. � � � �' `� .r � � a % ;i t �� '� %�. •'y� �, t�� 7 e e�� • . � �'ti y��^^�6 ' �� wG� _ "� � f 'M � .. / t_( M$ II -Z.Z -9.9 Pe-cu- WaAitj &,f5CO'tF `fvaxLkGgtvt;n9 is otn Ll a, -pe-co days away an OL = co"i dA ' -E- Le-f -6t e cLa v coo by W -thoof Wrrhn9 is tai -ho e ,Prc55 My /144 q! aL m j Uf has r.n.uc h, to Celebrate Tha.nle63tver-j. I-t Was Six innont�s ma -iOmorrou) Get" Z3) tll � experienced rl' L, care tar, a- r-re -5+ and. yvu. r'e c Poncled to -the t I ea.U.. Z' am hLE're I -Lo d aA4, oela.rge p� , c te, * yDu.r- e, -f or-B a rl cl A y o u r CoU.ea3 u es. C (,t) h I Le E do no-- have -ti-,e ha nd;) o-F others involved b e,6 0 c6 O Fpl cu- r- r" Aat*5 , pleas re l cu.f n1Y h eart iPeA t bh an,ks fa i�CM a.S we,U -) you_r kusnolness that d" +V A d: ---- m4 of aug hers J e n c; C lQ y rs) axn d -14-n n i'e. . C Ig mmth s n o ems) 50 cy p re exa_ted as was -= . the compcasj on, a.ncl conce-rn Vow shoved with my fare i 4 i n it►aVM at the house e-nd taver a:F -44le hospt�&(. God, has been wtfh. me eve,rvi step of -the WaL a.nd rno5t ce ba �nly that morning when our Iives beeo -m e, I n fert.Lo i n e d. Ara the, h.o Lid ads a f macho, � re.ci l t ze, a t.L over a:�.ry ho Lo tr a� b l ess ecl I' am to L .b e here, v ael eb ro-:L7 * Than les9 iv; n q uo i-Hu m -Faxv i i f and Loo lga n a.hea� w t�-fi� Y j 9 atx� -l-i ci �a�-,oiv -to -the kD Ud;ou j s ahead .Wha* 5 pec i a,. vne m or i es we. w & U, crea-te Lo l tiv o vur ,& LS . Ea_c.h✓ oL J i s ce r ta.A n l y a ALthouqh, this tkO-n k you, is Loh5 oveiridue, i t is noraativeLc6s he rt&Lt'. When rn� -Family City down tm -Mctn"wj r) r- ®n.1hw-yo -ciayi anti we. saq our cj rte, you.. W" cer o.-t -n ! b � anion .blesrp&n s. `thanks ivM 9 °`P P y 9 I Wa.rrn� y, Wound k Drive, F,5 . L-Iti �ueart has �m pmved wt+L ideopodhiG C.a diornvo - Fat �I h►' V�ral.6 cou4 cd b a, v i ri i n S� u.nd v�h�le T �t al�owys live; ws +h this Conotiiaiw aKa t%►c.Foss�b �l� o� re r� reb: t rn �' O-M no u) �� 2455363 CAKTON `leoa1 C A R D S TSQB N12A cun noe CAMMNCMM ® b C=VHAM4roHCM0H N1N Toro 1q owm I mu ts7 MADE W LLeA - FOLSOO — ��hA,15 C .1 . . . . r,y '. .�t, � �s �.y:, _ .yin'' - b,il':.. �**• 3 r6� y��• '� a. 5 "i— "' _9 - ivy .M1• ,- � +�``' � �* 1'�'_ - i 'I s� e`*' �' i Fyn 5 f - �gIP?.:7. '' � r -. ;.. n .t }�. �� '.2�...:iTf ��.-: � .,�a�P✓�••J�`•� /i — .. i�y �. t:f - '� � FSi :. � � 1 / • .il'�`'�'1�`�' ti; � �: ' fib" 1 7., � `. 1 r`y- ! �`� .r�. i Ott.': } ♦r � �._��`v� / =J( � 7 - 'tom, -- / - �pp,ta r•4ayiC�'q,.. e��kF�� 1„4�x , �C_7 _ t S J'r K ` 4 yr ur t � 5 i ryt l J F 4 SY� r Wl m R"Z _ r > > +'� �7A` ?A! 'r,„ r s�# S t'Y � �'„„ �r`4 i•� -?A"'r:' z ,r'd � "�"•i ` �i�N �* I... - C r � 7 's � u•� y d `r i z. n a< � ;� w any, �h� 9 L •��:,�' ?�w ts�} !' n5 _ ,�s� #s . Ste. .�l f � P '. h'� �.a [ Y,. ' � Y vy�.:(.. 1' "•... �5�.. .A Y.� u�J 53.:': 7 f kR:p ,'. �. ,*'.� io F: f,� }t •; -:,;;r A,i!'r '� j`sa {e ��'' ,ri'. :�� Y: = s ..� op J 3 ; 1.. r r lilt� . f / _ fyLl C.0 y1'y� / -2�' _ f S' le'1. L7'l )� l l E._ . ze. J 1lle Itol).e. v l 11, c:' � vr, I (Is (�e u)t lk t .c�t�c �Gr.��S ! /�<�ltdo"y''. .�c.�cIS011r. <� elf l e , COUNCIL CHECK _jISTER 15- DEC -1999 (16—L) page 1 CHECK NO --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------=--------------------------------- DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 205863 12/21/99 $835.77 3M CO HGF0878 Stick -On Letters TP80585 STREET NAME SI GENERAL SUPPLI 5015 < *> $835.77* 205864 12/21/99 $653.91 A & K EQUIPMENT COMPANY Cabinets for Shop 112999 -B EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5335 < *> $653.91* 205865 12/21/99 $81.19 AAA Credit Screening Ser Prof. Serv. - Credit 6674 POLICE DEPT. G PROF SERVICES < *> $81.19* 205866 12/21/99 $6.00 AAA Duplicate Plates for 120199 EQUIPMENT OPER LIC & PERMITS < *> $6.00* 205867 12/21/99 $308.16 ADVANCE SHORING CO Trench Rescue Jacks 1220909- FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 3642 < *> $308.16* 205868 12/21/99 $96.00 Aearo Co Prescription Safety G 03885966 EQUIPMENT OPER SAFETY EQUIPME 5158 12/21/99 $103.00 Aearo Co Prescription Safety G.03885969 ENGINEERING GE GENERAL SUPPLI 5158 < *> $199.00*- 205869 12/21/99 $27.80 ALBINSON Plans C04893 INSPECTIONS . PRINTING 12/21/99 $129.61 ALBINSON Plans 005406 INSPECTIONS PRINTING < *> $157.41* 205870 12/21/99 $414.50 All Saints Brands COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 00017217 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/21/99 $366.10 All Saints Brands COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 00017219 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 12/21/99 $488.00 All Saints Brands. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 00017228 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 $488.00 All Saints Brands. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 00017229 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $1,756.60* 205871 12/21/99 $46.20 All -Safe Div. of All Fir Fire Ext. Service 029968 ED BUILDING & CONTR REPAIRS < *> $46.20* 205872 12/21/99 $227.91 ALTERNATOR REBUILD Rebuilt Alternator 30447 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5217 < *> $227.91* 205873 12/21/99 $39.95 Amera -Chem, Inc. Books 7957 POLICE DEPT. G BOOKS & PAMPHL 3068 < *> $39.95* 205874 12/21/99 $1,249.84 AMERICAN BUSINESS FORMS Patron Cards 767649 GOLF ADMINISTR GENERAL SUPPLI 6095 12/21/99 $600.66 AMERICAN BUSINESS FORMS Patron Cards 769743 GOLF ADMINISTR GENERAL SUPPLI 6095 < *> $1,850.50* 205875 12/21/99 $53.91 Ameripride Linen & Appar Laundry 11/30 -1 VERNON OCCUPAN LAUNDRY 12/21/99 $17.35 Ameripride Linen & Appar Lab Towels 11/30 -2 LABORATORY LAUNDRY 12/21/99 $135.29 Ameripride Linen & Appar Laundry 11/30 -3 YORK OCCUPANCY LAUNDRY 12/21/99 $172.96 Ameripride Linen & Appar Mats, Rugs 11/30 -4 CITY HALL GENE LAUNDRY 12/21/99 $59.50 Ameripride Linen & Appar Laundry 11/30 -5 50TH.ST OCCUPA LAUNDRY 12/21/99 $190.58 Ameripride Linen & Appar Laundry 11/30 -6 FIRE DEPT. GEN LAUNDRY 12/21/99 $91.96 Ameripride Linen & Appar Rags /Towels 11/30 -7 GRILL LAUNDRY 12/21/99 $111.95 Ameripride Linen & Appar Laundry STMT1130 GOLF DOME CLEANING SUPPL 9024 < *> $833.50* 205876 12/21/99 $298.20 ANCHOR PRINTING COMPANY Brochure Printing 992450 -0 ADAPTIVE RECRE PRINTING < *> $298.20* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER Vince 128282 PARK MAINTENAN TELEPHONE 15- DEC -1999 (16:01) page 2 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 205877 12/21/99 $23.79 ANDERSON, TOM Replacement Pants 120299 GRILL LAUNDRY < *> Braemar Club House $23.79* Art Center 122099 Cornelia 205878 12/21/99 $360.00 ANOKA - HENNEPIN TECHNICAL Bus Extrication Train 30205 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONF & SCHOOLS < *> 122099 $360.00* $56.74* 122099 Van Valkenburg Park 122099 205879 12/21/99 $3,473.00 AON RISK SERVICES INC OF Premium 260200 CENT SVC GENER INSURANCE < *> < *> $3,473.00* $129.00* 205880 12/21/99 $66.00 APPLIANCE RECYCLING CENT Recycling Appliance P ARINV241 ASSESSING HAZ. WASTE DIS 5259 < *> $66.00* 205881 12/21/99 205882 12/21/99 205884 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 205885 12/21/99 12/21/99 205886 12/21/99 $9.28 Arch Paging $9.28* $192.81 $192.81* $137.22 $335.66 $335.65 $89.23 $20.44 $406.64 $43.40 $67.07 $234.42 $41.47. $172.69 $690.05 $63.08 $166.73 $22.19' $41.43 $2,867.37* $700.00 $29.25 $729.25* $151.29 $151.29* ASPEN EQUIPMENT.CO. Aspen Waste Systems Aspen Waste Systems Aspen Waste Systems Aspen Waste Systems Aspen Waste Systems Aspen Waste Systems Aspen Waste Systems Aspen Waste Systems Aspen Waste Systems Aspen Waste Systems Aspen Waste Systems Aspen Waste Systems Aspen Waste Systems Aspen Waste Systems Aspen Waste Systems Aspen Waste Systems Pager for Vince 128282 PARK MAINTENAN TELEPHONE Water Bar, Screws, Wa 456861 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS City Hall . 12/21/99 $845.70 Public Wors - Street 122099 Public Works - Buildi 122099 Fire Dept. $585.48 122099 Fire Station #2 2327354- 122099 Arena 122099 Dome BARR ENGINEERING COMPANY 122099 Braemar Maint. Bldg. 122099 Braemar Club House 122099 Art Center 122099 Cornelia 122099 Edinborough 12/21/99 122099 Vernon Batteries 122099 Yorkdale GENERAL SUPPLI 5325 122099 50th & France $56.74* 122099 Van Valkenburg Park 122099 Automatic Fire Alarm Ass Alarm Seminar Automatic Fire Alarm Ass Training Books Bags & Bows General Supplies CITY HALL GENE RUBBISH REMOVA GENERAL MAINT RUBBISH REMOVA PW BUILDING RUBBISH_REMOVA FIRE DEPT. GEN RUBBISH REMOVA FIRE SUPPLIES RUBBISH REMOVA ARENA BLDG /GRO RUBBISH REMOVA GOLF DOME RUBBISH REMOVA MAINT OF LOURS RUBBISH REMOVA CLUB HOUSE RUBBISH.REMOVA ART CENTER BLD RUBBISH REMOVA LITTER REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVA ED BUILDING & RUBBISH REMOVA VERNON OCCUPAN RUBBISH REMOVA YORK OCCUPANCY RUBBISH REMOVA 50TH ST OCCUPA RUBBISH REMOVA LITTER REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVA 5123 5184 11196 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONF & SCHOOLS 11197 FIRE DEPT. GEN BOOKS & PAMPHL 3643 02208366 ART SUPPLY GIF GENERAL SUPPLI 9101 205887 12/21/99 $845.70 BARR ENGINEERING COMPANY Pamela Park Storm Wat 2327354- PAMELA PK /LK S CIP 12/21/99 $585.48 BARR ENGINEERING COMPANY Parkwood Knolls, Brae 2327354- GENERAL STORM PROF SERVICES 12/21/99 $175.00 BARR ENGINEERING COMPANY Wetland Mgmt. Consult 2327Al2-,GENERAL STORM PROF SERVICES < *> $1,606.18* 205888 12/21/99 $56.74 BATTERIES PLUS Batteries F51 -5096 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 5325 < *> $56.74* 205889 12/21/99 $129.00 Battery Wholesale Inc Batteries 8520 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5309 < *> $129.00* 205890 12/21/99 $160.00 Bauer, Cynthia Ambulance Overpayment 120199 GENERAL FD PRO AMBULANCE FEES COUNCIL CHECK JISTER Beer Line Cleaning $56.15 3316 15- DEC -1999 (16 -) page 3 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <*> BROS. $160.00* $127.58 BERTELSON $102.00 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST 205891 12/21/99 $306.50 Bauer, Mike Conference Expense 120699 TRAINING CONF & SCHOOLS GDS < *> $106.03 $306.50* CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 205892 12/21/99 $200.00 BCA /Forensic Science Lab Cont. Ed. B1115990 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS CORPORATION < *> OF $200.00* SOLD MI 31009400 YORK SELLING CST OF 205893 12/21/99 $14,460.72 BEARCOM Replace Equipt.- 4 Re 1326830 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP REPLACEM 4239 MI 12/21/99 $75.00 BEARCOM 2 Wau Radio Repair 1380796 EQUIPMENT OPER RADIO SERVICE 5156 < *> COST $14,535.72* GOODS SOLD MI 31061100 VERNON SELLING CST 205894 12/21/99 $44.73 Becker Arena Products Paint 18236 ARENA BLDG /GRO PAINT 8094 < *> MI $44.73* YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX $951.17* 205895 12/21/99 205896 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 205897 12/21/99 205900 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 $42.00 Beer System Maintenance Beer Line Cleaning $56.15 3316 GRILL CONTR SERVICES 9026 $42.00* BERTELSON BROS. INC. $162.21 BERTELSON BROS. INC. $1.76 BERTELSON BROS. INC. $127.58 BERTELSON $102.00 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 17871800 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE $106.03 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 31009000 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX $275.07 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 31009400 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX $63.79 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 31061000 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX $237.78 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 31061100 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX $166.50 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 31061200 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX $951.17* $75.00 Benner, Christopher Undercover Liquor Com 120199 PRIMARY DISPAT PROF SERVICES $75.00* $11.95 BERTELSON BROS. INC. $56.15 BERTELSON BROS. INC. $13.13 BERTELSON BROS. INC. $162.21 BERTELSON BROS. INC. $1.76 BERTELSON BROS. INC. $127.58 BERTELSON BROS. INC. $170.12 BERTELSON BROS. INC. $49.11 BERTELSON BROS. INC. $13.76 BERTELSON BROS., INC. $7.37 BERTELSON BROS. INC. $59.91 BERTELSON BROS. INC. $21.25 BERTELSON BROS. INC. $38.92 BERTELSON BROS..INC. $60.43 BERTELSON BROS. INC. $6.56 BERTELSON BROS; INC. $161.86 BERTELSON BROS. INC. $5.21 BERTELSON BROS. INC. $32.59 BERTELSON BROS. INC. $41.40 BERTELSON BROS. INC. $6.92 BERTELSON BROS. INC. $84.44 BERTELSON BROS. INC. $133.11 BERTELSON BROS. INC. $10.01 BERTELSON BROS. INC. $3.99 BERTELSON BROS. INC. $10.01 BERTELSON BROS. INC. $20.72 BERTELSON BROS. INC. Hiliter, Glue Sticks 7164820 Office Supplies 7168720 2000 Calendar 7169140 Office Supplies 7169140 Office Supplies 7169140 File Supplies 7175370 Sr. Center Supplies 7179280 General Office Suppli. 7179630 General Office Suppli 7179630 General Office Suppli 7179630 Gen. Supplies - Boxes R334050 Office Supplies 7180200 Appt. Book 7180260 Misc. Office Supplies 7181310 Office Supplies 7181310 Office Supplies 7184350 Gen. Supplies /Office 7181311 Office Supplies 7198970 Office Supplies 7198970 Office Supplies 7198970 Office Supplies 7198970 OFfice Supplies 7198970 Office Supplies 7198970 Office Supplies 7200110 Office Supplies 720.0110 Office Supplies 7198971 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 5282 POLICE DEPT. G OFFICE SUPPLIE 3071 FINANCE GENERAL SUPPLI PARK ADMIN. GENERAL SUPPLI ELECTION GENERAL SUPPLI GOLF ADMINISTR OFFICE SUPPLIE 6293 GENERAL FD PRO CS GENERAL - CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI PARK ADMIN. GENERAL SUPPLI ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLI POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI 3062 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI CLUB HOUSE GENERAL SUPPLI 6294 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI PARK ADMIN. GENERAL SUPPLI INSPECTIONS GENERAL SUPPLI CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI ENGINEERING GE GENERAL SUPPLI PARK ADMIN. GENERAL SUPPLI GENERAL(BILLIN GENERAL SUPPLI ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLI CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI FINANCE GENERAL SUPPLI PARK ADMIN. GENERAL SUPPLI FINANCE GENERAL SUPPLI CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 15- DEC - 1999 (16:01) page 4 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------,-- 205900 12/21/99 $6.16 BERTELSON BROS. INC. Office Supplies 7198971 ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLI 12/21/99 $36.45 BERTELSON BROS. INC. Office Supplies 7208090 INSPECTIONS GENERAL SUPPLI 12/21/99 $4.13 BERTELSON BROS. INC. Office Supplies 7208090 ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLI 12/21/99 $20.20 BERTELSON BROS. INC. Office Supplies 7208090 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI 12/21/99 -$3.99 BERTELSON BROS. INC. Office Supplies CM719897 PARK ADMIN. GENERAL SUPPLI 12/21/99 - $10.01 BERTELSON BROS. INC. Office Supplies CM719897 FINANCE GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $1,363.41* 205901 12/21/99 $1,774.05 BEST BUY COMPANY INC. Grant - Laptop Cases 09700508 COPS MORE GRAN EQUIP REPLACEM 3022 12/21/99 $186.24 BEST BUY COMPANY INC. Craft Supplies 28105085 MEDIA LAB CRAFT SUPPLIES 9054 12/21/99 $153.29 BEST -BUY COMPANY INC. Cost of Goods Sold 28105010 MEDIA LAB COST OF GD SOL 9098 12/21/99 $35.95 BEST BUY COMPANY INC. Equipment Replacement 28105013 MEDIA LAB EQUIP REPLACEM 12/21/99 $255.77 BEST BUY COMPANY INC. Cost of Goods Sold 28105013 MEDIA LAB COST OF GD SOL 12/21/99 $70.27 BEST BUY COMPANY INC. Data Process - CD Rom 00504008 POLICE DEPT. G DATA PROCESSIN 3074 < *> $2,475.57* 205902 12/21/99 $35.00 Beverage & Food Dynamics Magazine Subscription 120699- LIQUOR.YORK GE DUES & SUBSCRI 4374 < *> $35.00* 205903 12/21/99 $5,385.30 BFI RECYCLING SYSTEMS Refuse 1093657- 50TH STREET RU PROF SERVICES 12/21/99 $35,092.44 BFI RECYCLING SYSTEMS Recycling 7000078- RECYCLING Recycling Char < *> $40,477.74* 205904 12/21/99 - $19.07 Biffs Inc Sanitation W81925 MAINT OF COURS RUBBISH REMOVA 9027 12/21/99 - $19.07 Biffs Inc Sanitation W81926 MAINT OF COURS RUBBISH REMOVA 9027 12/2;1/99 $66.76 Biffs Inc Sanitation W82212 FRED RICHARDS RUBBISH REMOVA 9027 < *> $28.62* 205905 12/21/99 $424.17 Bingo Sales Inc Brass Shelf Strips 00008537 YORK OCCUPANCY GENERAL SUPPLI 4371 < *> $424.17* 205906 12/21/99 $276.67 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS Asphalt 79385 GENERAL MAINT BLACKTOP 1704 12/21/99 $656.18 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS Asphalt 79453 GENERAL MAINT BLACKTOP 1704 12/21/99 $118.22 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS Asphalt 82416 DISTRIBUTION BLACKTOP 1704 < *> $1,051.07* 205907 12/21/99 $100.00 BLOOD, DAVID Police Service 120799 RESERVE PROGRA CONTR SERVICES < *> $100.00* 205908 12/21/99 $72.00 Bores, Pat Class Refund 113099 ART CNTR PROG REGISTRATION F < *> $72.00* 205909 12/21/99 $95.00 Boss Pumping Septic Tank Pumping 1401 BUILDING MAINT CONTR REPAIRS 5860 12/.21/99 $95.00 Boss Pumping. Septic Tank Pumping 1503 BUILDING MAINT CONTR REPAIRS 5116 < *> $190.00* 205910 12/21/99 $1,200.00 BOY SCOUT OF AMERICA Explorer Conference 121399 RESERVE PROGRA CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $1,200.00* 205911 12/21/99 $128.97 BRAEMAR PRINTING Handicap Cards 53017 GOLF ADMINISTR PRINTING .6299 < *> $128.97* 205912 12/21/99 $750.00 Broeske, Anne Marie Refund of Rental Depo 120899 EDINB /CL PROG RENTAL INCOME < *> $750.00* COUNCIL CHECK _ .jISTER 15- DEC -1999 (16:,,x) page 5 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 205913 12/21/99 $8,523.18 BRW INC. EAW Preparation 515 -0012 GENERAL FD PRO.MISCELLANOUS < *> $8,523.18* 205914 12/21/99 $342.50 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC Rock. 4524G,45 GENERAL STORM GENERAL SUPPLI 12/21/99 $2,673.86 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC Ballfield Ag -Line STMT 11/ FIELD MAINTENA INFIELD MIX 5104 < *> $3,016.36* 205915 12/21/99 $348.00 BUDGET LIGHTING Repair Lights 157099 ARENA BLDG /GRO CONTR REPAIRS 8088 < *> $348.00* 205916 12/21/99 $100.00 BUTLER, GEORGE Police Service 120799 RESERVE PROGRA CONTR SERVICES < *> $100.00* 205917 12/21/99 $1,300.00 CAD /CAM Engineering Syst Auto Cad Training -Joh 15100 ENGINEERING GE CONF & SCHOOLS 4538 12/21/99 $760.00 CAD /CAM Engineering Syst Software Installation 15170 ENGINEERING GE EQUIP REPLACEM 4549 < *> $2,060.00* 205918 12/21/99 $251.07 Camas Concrete 1120001 FIELD MAINTENA SAND,GRVL & RO 1766 12/21/99 $178.79 Camas Concrete 1120519 FIELD MAINTENA SAND,GRVL & RO 1766 12/21/99 $270.86 Camas Concrete 1120832 FIELD MAINTENA SAND,GRVL & RO 1766 12/21/99 $210.44 Camas Concrete for Garden P 1121231 FIELD MAINTENA SAND,GRVL & RO 1766 12/21/99 $395.65 Camas Concrete for Dug -outs 1121894 FIELD MAINTENA SAND,GRVL & RO 1766 < *> $1,306.81* 205919 12/21/99 $485.55 Capital Factors Inc Logo Clothing 1517080 GOLF DOME ADVERT OTHER 6330 < *> $485.55* 205920 12/21/99 $33.85 CARLSON TRACTOR / EQUIPMEN Sprocket, Spacer, Fla 1016466 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5311. < *> $33.85* 205921 12/21/99 $100.00 CARLSON, CRAIG Performed at EP 11 -26 120899 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $100.00* 205922 12/21/99 $390.37 CATCO Hydraulic Hose, Fitti 3 -16776 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5191 12/21/99 $106.46 CATCO Triangle Kits 3 -17121 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 5308 12/21/99 - $12.76 CATCO Credit 3 -17300 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 12/21/99 $263.94 CATCO Couplers, Hose, Fitti 3 -17654 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5386 < *> $748.01* 205923 12/21/99 $160.00 Chad Nestor & Associates Brochure 112999 ADAPTIVE RECRE PRINTING < *> $160.00* 205924 12/21/99 $280.00 CHAOUCH, HABIB Referee Soccer Games 120299 GOLF DOME PROF SERVICES < *> $280.00* 205925 12/21/99 $99.80 Christians, Inca Duplicate Permit 99005588 GENERAL FD PRO BUILDING PERMI < *> $99.80* 205926 12/21/99 $43.00 Christoffer, Kelli Supplies for Art Prog 120999 ADAPTIVE RECRE GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $43.00* 205927 12/21/99 $1,065.38 CITY OF RICHFIELD Light & Power 9601923 GENERAL STORM LIGHT & POWER WRITTEN < *> $1,.065.38* 205928 12/21/99 $15.71 City Wide Window Service Window Cleaning 147774. 50TH ST OCCUPA CONTR REPAIRS COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 15- DEC -1999 (16:01) page 6 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 205928 12/21/99 $25.56 City Wide Window Service Window Cleaning 147774 YORK OCCUPANCY CONTR REPAIRS 12/21/99 $15.71 City Wide Window Service Window Cleaning 147774 VERNON OCCUPAN CONTR REPAIRS < *> $56.98* 205929 12/21/99 $137.07 Commercial Pool & Spa Su Chlorine, Pool Test T 0104109- POOL TRACK GRE CHEMICALS 2215 12/21/99 $106.61 Commercial Pool & Spa Su Pool Parts, Flow Mete 0104411= POOL TRACK GRE GENERAL SUPPLI 2207 12/21/99 $291.31 Commercial Pool & Spa Su Lane Markers 0104412- POOL TRACK GRE GENERAL SUPPLI 2219 12/21/99 $126.08 Commercial Pool & Spa Su Chlorine, Muriatic Ac 0104449 - POOL TRACK GRE CHEMICALS 2221 < *> $661.07* 205930 12/21/99 $362.02 COMPUSA INC General Supplies 40107786 MEDIA LAB GENERAL SUPPLI 9094 < *> $362.02* 205931 12/21/99 $279.47 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS Flashlights, Cough Dr 01086062 GENERAL MAINT SAFETY EQUIPME 5324 < *> $279.47* 205932 12/21/99 $268.21 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO Stoneware 038476 ART SUPPLY GIF COST OF GD SOL 9076 < *> $268.21* 205933 12/21/99 $314.18 Coverall of The Twin Cit.Cleaning Service 00000457 ART CENTER BLD PROF SERVICES < *> $314.18* 205934 12/21/99 $76.58 Crown Trophy Memorial Plaque 121299 PARK MEMORIALS GENERAL SUPPLI 7050 < *> $76.58* 205935 12/21/99 $194.56 Curtis 1000 Envelopes 29173501 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI 4560 12/21/99 $300.17 Curtis 1000 Parking Stickers 29325301 GENERAL FD PRO DUE FROM HRA 4561 < *> $494.73* 205936 12/21/99 $674.88 DANKO EMERGENCY EQUIPMEN Hose 312436 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 3559 12/21/99 $786.30 DANKO EMERGENCY EQUIPMEN Turnout Gear 312571 FIRE DEPT. GEN PROTECT CLOTHI 3517 12/21/99 $779.30 DANKO EMERGENCY EQUIPMEN Turnout Gear 312726 FIRE DEPT. GEN PROTECT CLOTHI 3632 < *> $2,240.48* 205937 12/21/99 $4,248.35 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 78775 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/21/99 $2,560.97 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 78776 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/21/99 $878.40 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 78966 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/21/99 $1,217.50 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 78967 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/21/99 $160.00 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 79210 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/21/99 $1,140.00 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 79358 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 12/21/99 $629.70 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 79510 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/21/99 $1,984.90 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 79512 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE < *> $12,819.82* 205938 12/21/99 $895.40 DCA-INC Fee for Service 303340 CENT SVC GENER HOSPITALIZATIO < *> $895.40* 205939 12/21/99 $413.39 DELEGARD TOOL CO. Hammers, Screwdrivers 180696 SNOW & ICE REM GENERAL SUPPLI 5222 12/21/99 $179.48 DELEGARD TOOL CO. Starter Kit, Weld Coa 186083 PUMP & LIFT ST TOOLS 5452 < *> $592.87* 205940 12/21/99 $22.72 De1Mar Job Cancelled 99001683 GENERAL FD PRO MECHAN PERMITS < *> $22.72* 205941 12/21/99 $35.70 DENNYS 5th AV BAKERY Bakery. 26687 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 9029 COUNCIL CHECK ....LISTER 15- DEC -1999 (16...1) page 7 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <*> $35.70* 205943 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 205944 12/21/99 205945 12/21/99 205946 12/21/99 205947 12/21/99 205948 12/21/99 205949 205951 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 $147.74 $62.94 $91.03 $60.48 $297.83 $15.12 $15.12 $29.16 $30.24 $44.82 $90.18 $158.60 $110.76 $236.08 $14.58 $80.11 $48.82 $1,533.61* Department Department Department Department Department Department Department Department Department Department Department Department Department Department Department Department Department of Administat Warming House of Administat Liquor 50th of Administat Liquor York of Administat Liquor Vernon of Administat Historical of Administat Arneson of Administat Greenhouse of Administat Card Access -Parks of Administat Senior Center of Administat Aquatic of Administat Fire Station #2 of Administat Central Svcs of Administat Art Center of Administat Edinborough of Administat Arena of Administat Golf Dome of Administat L.D. Lines $39.22 BELLBOY CORP $39.22* $3,345.00 DLT Solutions Inc $3,345.00* $122.84 DOALL TWIN CITIES CO $122.84* $380.80 Donnelly, Charles $380.80* $629.13 DPD $629.13* $250.00 DVORAK, MARY $250.00* - $11.36 $126.69 $1,766.13 $1,756.81 $1,259.88 $156.57 $69.19 - $14.41 $1,071.71 $95.35 $673.40 $42.80 $943.60 $1,071.31 $163.65 $151.10 EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE Job Cancelled AutoCad Software Silencer Saw Blade W9910064 SKATING & HOCK TELEPHONE W9910064 50TH ST OCCUPA TELEPHONE W9910064 YORK OCCUPANCY TELEPHONE W9910064 VERNON OCCUPAN TELEPHONE W9910064 BUILDING MAINT TELEPHONE W9910064 BUILDING MAINT TELEPHONE W9910064 BUILDING MAINT TELEPHONE W9910064 BUILDING MAINT TELEPHONE W9910064 SENIOR CITIZEN TELEPHONE W9910064 POOL OPERATION TELEPHONE W9910064 YORK FIRE STAT TELEPHONE W9910064 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE W9910064 ART CENTER BLD TELEPHONE W9910064 ED ADMINISTRAT TELEPHONE W9910064 ARENA BLDG /GRO TELEPHONE W9910064 GOLF DOME TELEPHONE W9910065 CLUB HOUSE TELEPHONE 99003695 GENERAL FD PRO MECHAN PERMITS 104414 ENGINEERING GE EQUIP REPLACEM 4519 02328937 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 5301 Ambulance Overpayment 120199 GENERAL FD PRO AMBULANCE FEES Brochures Printed 0010148- GOLF ADMINISTR PRINTING Art Work Sold 121399 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 523922 SOLD WI 141735 SOLD WI 142840 SOLD WI 142845 SOLD WI 142848 SOLD WI 142849 SOLD WI 142851 SOLD WI 524903 SOLD WI 146502 SOLD WI 146504 SOLD WI 146506 SOLD WI 146512 SOLD WI 146513 SOLD WI 146517 SOLD WI 146518 SOLD WI 146519 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 6304 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 15- DEC -1999 (16:01) page 8 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ < *> $9,322.42* 205952 12/21/99 $505.11 EARL F. ANDERSON Directional Signs, B1 21545 STREET NAME SI SIGNS & POSTS 5260 < *> $505.11* 205953 12/21/99 $3,905.05 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 554084 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/21/99 $2,305.05 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 555948 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/21/99 $3,510.65 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 555949 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 12/21/99 $5,968.25 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 556536 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/21/99 $444.70 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 557128 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/21/99 $44.00 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS. SOLD MI 557129 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 12/21/99 $27.15 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 557648 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 12/21/99 $1,697.60 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 558915 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 12/21/99 $3,208.10 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 558916 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/21/99 $6,130.15 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 559479 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/21/99 $45.25 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 559484 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/21/99 $133.00 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 560132 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE < *> $27,418.95* 205954 12/21/99 $121.09 ECOLAB PEST ELIMINATION Pest Control 6456388 CENTENNIAL LAK SVC CONTR EQUI CONTRACT 12/21/99 $102.67 ECOLAB PEST ELIMINATION Pest Elimination 6456392 POOL TRACK GRE SVC CONTR EQUI CONTRACT < *> $223.76* 205955 12/21/99 $12.85 Edina Cleaners Clean Table Linens 139970 POOL TRACK GRE LAUNDRY 2227 < *> $12.85* 205956 12/21/99 $1,000.00 Eklund Tree Recycling Tree_ Waste Disposal 120199 TREES & MAINTE RUBBISH REMOVA < *> $1,000.00* 205957 12/21/99 $31.41 ELASKY, JEFF Continuing Education 112999 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $31.41* 205958 12/21/99 $153.36 Electric Pump Waldor Gro Brass Wear Ring 11724 LIFT STATION M REPAIR PARTS 5484 12/21/99 $101.18 Electric Pump Waldor Gro Pipe Support 12221 PUMP & LIFT ST REPAIR PARTS 5338 < *> $254.54* 205959 12/21/99 $1,469.70 ELECTRIC SERVICE CO Remove Fountains from 115794 CENTENNIAL LAK SVC CONTR EQUI 2039 < *> $1,469.70* 205960 12/21/99 $331.75 ELVIN SAFETY Gas Monitor 38825201 SEWER TREATMEN SAFETY EQUIPME 5214 < *> $331.75* 205961 12/21/99 $1,770.00 EMBEDDED SYSTEMS INC Civil Def. - Service 5809 CIVIL DEFENSE SVC CONTR EQUI < *> $1,770.00* 205962 12/21/99 $7,405.79 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAIN E -82 Pump Repair 2818 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONTR REPAIRS 3623 12/21/99 $1,512.44 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAIN Tower 90 Cylinder Rep 2938 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONTR REPAIRS 3602 < *> $8,918.23* 205963 12/21/99 $650.00 EMPLOYEES CLUB Supplies 120799 CONTINGENCIES GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $650.00* 205964 12/21/99 $10,948.82 EnComm Midwest Contract Payment #1 122199 GENERAL(BILLIN CONTR REPAIRS <*> $10,948.82* COUNCIL CHECK .__jISTER 15- DEC -1999 (lb _) page 9 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 205965 12/21/99 $2,672.00 Expert T Billing Nov. Expert T 120299 GENERAL FD PRO AMBULANCE FEES < *> $2,672.00* 205966 12/21/99 $600.00 FAHRENKRUG, ROGER Instructor - Group Le 120699 GOLF DOME PROF SERVICES < *> $600.00* . 205967 12/21/99 $100.00 FARBER, DIANE Art Work Sold 121399 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $100.00* 205968 12/21/99 $72.95 Fast Foto & Digital Adv. Film & Dev. T2 -33840 ART CENTER ADM ADVERT OTHER 9110 < *> $72.95* 205969 12/21/99 $220.00 Feygin, Leonard Soccer Ref. 11 Games 120299 GOLF DOME PROF SERVICES < *> $220.00* 205970 12/21/99 $109.80 FLAHERTY'S HAPPY TYME CO COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 9504 VERNON.SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 12/21/99 $241.50 FLAHERTY'S HAPPY TYME CO COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 9507 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $351.30* 205971 12/21/99 $105.00 FMAM 2000 Dues- Landry, Med 121099 FIRE DEPT. GEN DUES & SUBSCRI < *> $105.00* 205972 12/21/99 $52.39 Force America Auger Feedback Cable 013509 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5312 < *> $52.39* 205973 12/21/99 $92.34 FORMS GROUP, THE Printing 00002708 POLICE DEPT. G PRINTING < *> $92.34* 205974 12/21/99 $31.75 FREEWAY DODGE INC. Level Unit 44879DOW EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5299 < *> $31.75* 205975 12/21/99 $207.68 FREEWAY RADIATOR SERVICE New Radiator 25968 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5183 < *> $207.68* 205976 12/21/99 $75.00 Freidson, Jenne Undercover Liquor Com 120199 PRIMARY DISPAT PROF SERVICES < *> $75.00* 205977 12/21/99 $240.81 Freund, Jeff General Supplies 120999 POOL TRACK GRE GENERAL SUPPLI 12/21/99 $14.23 Freund, Jeff Plants 120999 POOL TRACK GRE TREES FLWR SHR 12/21/99 $39.60 Freund, Jeff Postage 120999 ED ADMINISTRAT POSTAGE < *> $294.64* 205978 12/21/99 $74.83 G & K DIRECT PURCHASE Purchased Clothing 3017682 PUMP & LIFT ST LAUNDRY 5154 12/21/99 $32.14 G & K DIRECT PURCHASE Purchased Clothing 3019702 PUMP & LIFT ST LAUNDRY 5154 < *> $106.97* 205979 12/21/99 $185.26 G & K SERVICES Lanudry - Mats 113099 ARENA BLDG /GRO LAUNDRY 12/21/99 $102.04 G & K SERVICES Rental Clothes 113099 PUMP & LIFT ST LAUNDRY 12/21/99 $175.62 G & K SERVICES Rental Clothes 113099 PW BUILDING CLEANING SUPPL 12/21/99 $219.68 G & K SERVICES Rental Clothes 113099 BUILDING MAINT LAUNDRY 12/21/99 $283.87 G & K SERVICES Rental Clothes 113099 EQUIPMENT OPER LAUNDRY 12/21/99 $41.95 G & K SERVICES Rental Clothes 113099 CITY HALL GENE LAUNDRY 12/21/99 $45.60 G & K SERVICES Rental Clothes 113099 STREET REVOLVI GENERAL SUPPLI 12/21/99 $534.52 G & K SERVICES Rental Clothes 113099 GENERAL MAINT LAUNDRY < *> $1,588.54* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 15- DEC -1999 (16:01) page 10 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 205980 12/21/99 $300.00 GEISHEKER, PATRICIA Prof. Serv. AC 121399 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $300.00* 205981 12/21/99 $133.13 George Byron Griffiths S Mayor's Photo 131 CITY COUNCIL PROF SERVICES 4552 < *> $133.13* 205982 12/21/99 $580.00 GOLFCRAFT Clubs 12860 PRO SHOP COST-OF GDS -PR 9448 < *> $580.00* 205983 12/21/99 $477.26 GOODIN CO. Pipes 1378050- PUMP & LIFT ST REPAIR PARTS 5362 < *> $4,77.26* 205984 12/21/99 $2,674.22 GRAINGER Tank Top Heater 937 -1386 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLI 5975 12/21/99 $37.18 GRAINGER Gloves, Thermometer 498 -5081 POOL TRACK GRE GENERAL SUPPLI 2211 12/21/99 - $40.37 GRAINGER Credit 498 -5081 POOL TRACK GRE GENERAL SUPPLI 12/21/99 - $2,674.22 GRAINGER Credit 495 -6386 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLI 5975 12/21/99 $145.19 GRAINGER V -Belt .495 -9730 POOL TRACK GRE GENERAL SUPPLI 2217 12/21/99 $37.07 GRAINGER Sledge Hammer 495 -0638 PUMP & LIFT ST TOOLS 5326 12/21/99 $69.90 GRAINGER Motor 970 -2281 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 5150 12/21/99 $199.36 GRAINGER Welding Screen /Frame, 495 -3251 BUILDINGS GENERAL SUPPLI 5346 12/21/99 $148.01 GRAINGER Drum Lifter, Dispense 495 -4357 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5360 < *> $596.34* 205985 12/21/99 $912.00 Grand Pere Wines Inc COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 00006554 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 $365.00 Grand Pere Wines Inc COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 00006555 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $1,277.00* 205986 12/21/9.9 $1,561.00 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 28152 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 $2,204.00 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 28153 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 $428.00 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 28308 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 $366.00 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 28331 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $4,559.00* 205987 12/21/99 $349.80 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. Connectors, Body Cove 500 -5088 CITY HALL GENE REPAIR PARTS 5348 12/21/99 $481.02 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. Balst Tray 104 -6297 ST LIGHTING OR GENERAL SUPPLI 5075 < *> $830.82* 205988 12/21/99 $4,586.70 Great Western Corp. Corrected Final Payme 120799 LIFT STATION CIP < *> $4,586.70* 205989 12/21/99 $640.50 Greater Minneapolis Area Professional Services 46842 SWIM INSTRUCT PROF SERVICES < *> $640.50* 205990 12/21/99 $372.75 Greener Pastures Corpora Organic Fertilizer 6548 GENERAL TURF C FERTILIZER 5119 < *> $372.75* 205991 12/21/99 $920.83 GREER, PAT Visual Arts Programme 120199. ED ADMINISTRAT PROF SERVICES < *> $920.83* 205992 12/21/99 $6,000.00 GREUPNER, JOE Monthly Retainer - Ja 120799 GOLF ADMINISTR PRO SVC - GOLF < *> $6,000.00* 205993 12/21/99 $150.00 GRIFFITHS, GEORDIE Prof. Serv. AC 121399 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $150.00* COUNCIL CHECK ....LISTER 15- DEC -1999 (16:__, page 11" CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 205995 12/21/99 - $11.91 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 524718 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 - $180.88 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 524719 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 - $26.25 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 524720 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 $4,994.14 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 142842 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 12/21/99 $46.06 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 142843 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 12/21/99 $28.69 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 142844 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 12/21/99 $2,783.23 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 142847 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 12/21/99 $5,700.45 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 142854 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 12/21/99 $237.94 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 142855 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 12/21/99 - $93.69 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 525094 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 $771.80 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 145297 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 12/21/99 - $2,457.69 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 525404 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 $57.10 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 146503 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 12/21/99 $271.55 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 146505 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 12/21/99 $105.00 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 146508 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 12/21/99 $22.89 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 146509 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 12/21/99 $3,334.87 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 146510 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 12/21/99. $962.75 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 146511 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 12/21/99 $1,153.30 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 146515 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 12/21/99 $86.02 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 146516 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 12/21/99 $764.30 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 146520 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 12/21/99 $4,033.71 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 146523 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU < *> $22,583.38* 205996 12/21/99 $270.00 Groth Music Sheet Music 255895 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI 7044 12/21/99 $49.76 Groth Music Sheet Music 255924 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI 7044 12/21/99 $56.50 Groth Music Sheet Music 255938 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI 7044 < *> $376.26* 205997 12/21/99 $408.00 GUSTAFSON, KATHY Teaching AC 121399 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $408.00* 205998 12/21/99 $3,142.28 H &L MESABI Snowblower & Parts 042404 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5729 12/21/99 $2,976.72 H &L MESABI Cut Edges 042893 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5729 < *> $6,119.00* 205999 12/21/99 $225.85 HALLMAN OIL COMPANY Bulk Oil 27539 EQUIPMENT OPER LUBRICANTS 1760 12/21/99 $430.26 HALLMAN OIL COMPANY Bulk Eng. Oil 27542 EQUIPMENT OPER LUBRICANTS 1760 12/21/99 $297.14 HALLMAN OIL COMPANY Bulk Eng. Oil 27543 EQUIPMENT OPER LUBRICANTS 1760 12/21/99 $84.99 HALLMAN OIL COMPANY Washer Fluid 27679 EQUIPMENT OPER LUBRICANTS 5314 < *> $1,038.24* 206000 12/21/99 $10.50 Halstead, Todd License Upgrades 121099 TRAINING CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $10.50* 206001 12/21/99 $60.60 HARMON AUTOGLASS Clear Laminated Glass 14011575 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5313 < *> $60.60 *. 206002 12/21/99 $193.40 HAROLD CHEVROLET Headlamp 40291CVW EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5303 < *> $193.40* 206003 12/21/99 $22,479.00 HARRIS HOMEYER CO. Premium 12510 CENT SVC GENER INSURANCE 12/21/99 $14,760.00 HARRIS HOMEYER CO. Premium 12511 CENT SVC GENER INSURANCE < *> $37,239.00* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 15- DEC -1999 (16:01) page 12 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 206004 12/21/99 $6,431.67 Hartland Fuel Products L Gas - Diesel 325635 EQUIPMENT OPER GASOLINE 1217 12/21/99 $178.86 Hartland Fuel Products L Gas - Diesel 326830 EQUIPMENT OPER GASOLINE 325635 12/21/99 $8,675.42 Hartland Fuel Products L Unleaded Gas 326646 EQUIPMENT OPER GASOLINE 1217 < *> $15,285.95* 206005 12/21/99 $75.00 Haw, Stephanie Undercover Liquor Com 120199 PRIMARY DISPAT PROF SERVICES < *> $75.00* 206006 12/21/99 $25.00 Hawkins Chemicals Chemicals DM 32871 POOL OPERATION CHEMICALS < *> $25.00* 206007 12/21/99 $493.00 HAYWA, PHYLLIS Prof. Serv. AC 121399 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $493.00* 206008 12/21/99 $457.07 HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNIT Ambulance Equipt Exch 120699 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 9773 < *> $457.07* 206009 12/21/99 $31.00 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF Equip. Maint. 34904 & POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP.MAINT < *> $31.00* 206010 12/21/99 $941.56 Hennepin County Sheriff' Booking Fees 1- 121 -21 LEGAL SERVICES COURT CHARGES < *> $941.56* 206011 12/21/99 $3,224.36 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURE Room & Board 002468 ( LEGAL SERVICES BRD & RM PRISO < *> $3,224.36* 206012 12/21/99 $25.00 Hennepin County Notary Renewal - C. F 120699 ENGINEERING GE DUES & SUBSCRI < *> $25.00* 206013 12/21/99 $25.00 Hennepin County Notary Renewal - D. W 120699 CONTINGENCIES DUES & SUBSCRI < *> $25.00* 206014. 12/21/99 $5,425.00 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLE Lt. Testing 00016849 FIRE DEPT. GEN PROF SERVICES < *> $5,425.00* 206015 12/21/99 $200.00 Hergott, Gail Art Work Sold 121399 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $200.00* 206016 12/21/99 $26.18 HIRSHFIELDS Paint 00353563 CITY HALL GENE GENERAL SUPPLI 5331 12/21/99 $13.86 HIRSHFIELDS Brushes & Tape 00353566 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $40.04* 206017 12/21/99 $1,386.67 Ho, Jeffery D Medical Director Sery 120799 FIRE DEPT. GEN PROF SERVICES < *> $1,386.67* 206018 12/21/99 $148.75 Hoel, Judy Pro Skating Lessons 121399 POOL TRACK GRE PROF SERVICES < *> $148.75* 206019 12/21/99 $475.28 HOFFER'S INC Window /Door Repair 714484 -R STREET REVOLVI GENERAL SUPPLI 51.52 < *> $475.28* 206020 12/21/99 $1,207.50 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP 20/20 Plan 120999 CONTINGENCIES PROF SERVICES < *> $1,207.50* 206021 12/21/99 $76.55 Home Juice COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 47776 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX COUNCIL CHECK JISTER 15- DEC -1999 (16: page 13 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ < *> $76.55* 206022 12/21/99 $40.00 Honeywell Inc Phone Line Repairs 299PS148 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONTR_REPAIRS < *> $40.00* 206024 12/21/99 $18.32 KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT _ Lumber 0217 -406 BUILDING MAINT LUMBER 5102 12/21/99 $327.38 KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT Green T -Posts 0217 -406 SNOW & ICE REM GENERAL SUPPLI 5221 12/21/99 $384.17 KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT Green T -Posts 0217 -406 SNOW & ICE REM GENERAL SUPPLI 5257 12/21/99 $22.58 KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT Green T -Posts 0211 -270 SNOW & ICE REM GENERAL SUPPLI 5109 12/21/99 $123.54 KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT Green T -Posts 0211 -270 PATHS & HARD S GENERAL SUPPLI 5110 12/21/99 $21.98 KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT Lumber 0217 -406 BUILDING MAINT LUMBER 5108 12/21/99 $171.54 KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT General Supply 0217 -406 ARENA BLDG /GRO.GENERAL SUPPLI 8079 12/21/99 $176.43 KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT Coping Saw Blades, Bo 0217 -407 CITY HALL GENE REPAIR PARTS 5279 12/21/99 $7.09 KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT Mortar Mix 0217 -407 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 5280 12/21/99 $113.47 KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT General Supply 0217 -407 ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPLI 8082 12/21/99 $225.78 KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT T -Posts 0217 -407 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 5306 12/21/99 $26.23 KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT. Vinyl Sinker, Casing 0217 -407 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 5323 12/21/99 $69.56 KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT Drywall /Power Bit /Scr 0217 -407 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 5340 12/21/99 $86.73 KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT Paint/Tape_ 0217 -408 MAINT OF LOURS GENERAL SUPPLI 6259 12/21/9.9 $26.35 KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT Sawzall Blade /Knife /S 02174083 BUILDING MAINT TOOLS 1 5124 12/21/99 $24.70 KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT Primeguard Plus, Lumb 0217 -408 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 5365 < *> $1,825.85* 206025 12/21/99 $1,908.80 HTE Inc Cont. Ed. - Crimes 549020 POLICE DEPT.,G CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $1,908.80* 206026 12/21/99 $59.10 HUEBSCH Towels, Linens 917715 POOL TRACK GRE SVC CONTR EQUI CONTRACT 12/21/99 $49.33 HUEBSCH Towels & Rags 921575 POOL TRACK GRE SVC CONTR EQUI CONTRACT < *> $108.43* 206027 12/21/99 $25,825.00 HUNERBERG CONSTRUCTION C Park Shelter Construc FINAL PKBOND CIP EQUIP REPLACEM CONTRACT < *> $25,825.00* 206028 12/21/99 $305.71 IBM CORPORATION Service Contract 09VO544 POLICE DEPT. G SVC CONTR EQUI < *> $305.71* 206029 12/21/99 $511.08 Imprint Enterprises, Inc Gen. Supplies - Backu 95588 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI 3069 < *> $511.08* 206030 12/21/99 $139.04 INDELCO PLASTIC CORP. PVC Adapter, Tee, Pip 196529 FIELD MAINTENA REPAIR PARTS 5127 < *> $139.04* 206031 12/21/99 $202.50 Industrial Scientific Co Gasbadge Repair & Rea 292369 LIFT STATION M SAFETY EQUIPME 5979 < *> $202.50* 206032 12/21/99 $100.00 Institute of Real Estate Real Estate 2000 120399 ASSESSING CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $100.00* 206033 12/21/99 $69.22 IOS Capital Equipment Rental -Cop 45710380 ART CENTER ADM EQUIP RENTAL < *> $69.22* 206034 12/21/99 $125.00 Itness, Andy Cancellation Refund - 120199 GENERAL FD PRO RENTAL OF PROP < *> $125.00* 206035 12/21/99 $2,700.00 IUOE LOCAL 49 Training 112999 TRAINING CONF & SCHOOLS COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 15- DEC -1999 (16:01) page 14 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <*> $2,700.00* 206036 12/21/99 $62.71 J.H. LARSON COMPANY Lights, Voltage, Dete 4148559- 50TH ST OCCUPA GENERAL SUPPLI 5277. 12/21/99 $87.01 J.H. LARSON COMPANY Lamps 4149155- STREET REVOLVI GENERAL SUPPLI 5322 12/21/99 $135.28 J.H. LARSON COMPANY Ext Cords, Wire Term, 4149472- ST LIGHTING OR GENERAL SUPPLI 5332 12/21/99 $28.75 J.H. LARSON COMPANY Fan Blade 4149765- PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPLI 5350 12/21/99 $160.72 J.H. LARSON COMPANY Lamps 4150388- ST LIGHTING OR GENERAL SUPPLI 5369 12/21/99 $548.34 J.H. LARSON COMPANY Light Bulbs 4150569- PARKING RAMP GENERAL SUPPLI 5378 12/21/99 - $160.72 J.H. LARSON COMPANY Credit 4520898- ST LIGHTING OR GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $862.09* 206037 12/21/99 $136.98 JAMES & COMPANY INC Memorial Plate (Brass 35558 PARK MEMORIALS GENERAL SUPPLI 7032 < *> $136.98* 206038 12/21/99 $100.00 JAMES, WILLIAM F Police Service 120799 RESERVE PROGRA CONTR SERVICES < *> $100.00* 206039 12/21/99 $116.39 JERRY'S FOODS Chair Meeting & Elect 113099 ELECTION GENERAL SUPPLI 12/21/99 $79.58 JERRY'S FOODS General Supplies 113099 ART CENTER ADM GENERAL SUPPLI 12/21/99 $22.45 JERRY'S FOODS Food for Resale 113099 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 12/21/99 $29.43 JERRY'S FOODS Adaptive Rec- General 113099 ADAPTIVE RECRE GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $247.85* 206041 12/21/99 $7.83 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 113099 ENGINEERING GE GENERAL SUPPLI 12/21/99 $10.53 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 113099 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 12/21/99 $38.17 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 113099 ST LIGHTING OR GENERAL SUPPLI 12/21/99 $44.74 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 113099 STREET NAME SI GENERAL SUPPLI 12/21/99 $2.55 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 113099 STREET REVOLVI GENERAL SUPPLI 12/21/99 $49.89 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 113099 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI 12/21/99 $132.95 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 113099 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 12/21/99 $2.94 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 113099 CITY HALL GENE GENERAL SUPPLI 12/21/99 $66.13 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 113099 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 12/21/99 •$122.65 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 113099 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 12/21/99 $337.63 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 113099 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 12/21/99 $74.88 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 113099 GOLF ADMINISTR GENERAL SUPPLI 12/21/99 $28.10 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 113099 GOLF DOME GENERAL SUPPLI 12/21/99 $64.04 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 113099 ARENA ICE MAIN GENERAL SUPPLI 12/21/99 $229.42 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 113099 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 12/21/99 $51.41 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 113099 PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPLI 12/21/99 $8.29 JERRY'S HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 113099 VERNON OCCUPAN GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $1,272.15* 206042 12/21/99 $166.29 JERRY'S PRINTING New Inspection Report A -12587 INSPECTIONS PRINTING . < *> $166.29* 206046 12/21/99 - $52.35 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 106880 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 - $112.90 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 106882 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 12/21/99 - $34.35 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 107348 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 - $96.65. JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 107349 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 $120.00 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1052654 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 $2,663.02 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1052834 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 12/21/99 $1,109.87 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR _COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1052835 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 12/21/99 $592.50 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1052836 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 $125.30 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1052837 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 $7,940.18 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1052838 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU COUNCIL CHECK _ _jISTER 15- DEC -1999 (16:. , page 15 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 206046 12/21/99 $569.15 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1052639 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 $110.08 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1052840 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 12/21/99 $1,380.33 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1052841 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 $93.65 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1052842 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 12/21/99 $1,069.19 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1052843 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 $3,463.65 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1052845 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 $0.65 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1052846 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 $293.59 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1052847 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 12/21/99 $2,341.49 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1052848 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 $1,366.25 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1052849 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 12/21/99 $457.75 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1052850 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 12/21/99 $1,064.25 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1052851 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 $371.30 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1052852 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 12/21/99 $1,542.15 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1052853 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 $1,551.90 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1052854 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 12/21/99 $2,010.20 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1052855 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 $5,699.88 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1055908 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 12/21/99 $750.89 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1055909 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 12/21/99 $383.05 JOHNSON.BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1055910 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 $71.45 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1055911 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 $4,692.23 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1055912 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 12/21/99 $379.80 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1055913 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 $1,495.69 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1055914 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 $25.28 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1055915 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 12/21/99 $5,586.33 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1055916 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 $359.60 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1055917 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 12/21/99 $3,883.40 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1055918 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 $725.45 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1056581 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 12/21/99 $168.75 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1056582 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $54,162.00* 206047 12/21/99 $250.00 JOHNSON, NAOMI Art Work Sold 121399 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $250.00* 206048 12/21/99 $115.24 JOHNSON, NAOMI Craft Supplies 121399 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES 12/21/99 $12.03 JOHNSON, NAOMI Maint. Gen Supplies 121399 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI 12/21/99 $52.85 JOHNSON, NAOMI Gen. Supplies 121399 ART CENTER ADM GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $180.12* 206049 12/21/99 $100.00 JOHNSON, WALTER Police Service 120799 RESERVE PROGRA CONTR SERVICES < *> $100.00* 206050 12/21/99 $4.38 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY OF GOLD Hub 156962 BUILDINGS GENERAL SUPPLI 5329 < *> $4.38* 206051 12/21/99 $12.83 JOHNSTONS SALES & SERVIC 2 Wheels, 1 Axle 372604 GRILL CONTR REPAIRS 12/21/99 $34.50 JOHNSTONS SALES & SERVIC Vacum Cleaner Repair 373015 YORK OCCUPANCY CONTR REPAIRS 4372 < *> $47.33* 206052 12/21/99 $100.00 Jonas, Lenore Art Work Sold 121399 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $100.00* 206053 12/21/99 $40.00 JULIEN, DIANE Reimburs. Notary Comm 120699 TRAINING CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $40.00* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 121399 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES Merchandise 082969 15- DEC -1999 (16:01) page 16 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ----------------------------------------------------------------------------_-------------------------------------------------------- 206054 12/21/99 $2.48 JULIEN, DIANE Mileage 112999 TRAINING MILEAGE 12/21/99 $2.05 JULIEN, DIANE Mailing 112999 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 12/21/99 $10.62 JULIEN, DIANE Office Supplies 112999 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $15.15* DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS 206055 12/21/99 206056 12/21/99 206057 12/21/99 206058 12/21/99 206059 12/21/99 206061 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 12/21/99 206062 12/21/99 206063 12/21/99 206064 206065 $324.83 JUSTUS LUMBER Wood $324.83* $45.00 Katz- James, Gail $45.00* $1,722.05 $1,722.05* $82.96 $82.96* $117.18 $117.18* - $560.40 - $106.64 $1,273.50 $1,839.55 $1,568.80 $2,413.65 $36.00 $90.00 $1,166.90 $621.80 $87.20 $54.00 $2,489.05 $90.00 $68.00 $11,131.41* Kelly Promotions Inc KINKO'S Kirchman, Steve A Kiwi Kai Imports Inc Kiwi Kai Imports Inc Kiwi Kai Imports Inc Kiwi Kai Imports Inc Kiwi Kai Imports Inc Kiwi Kai Imports Inc Kiwi Kai Imports Inc Kiwi Kai Imports Inc Kiwi Kai Imports Inc Kiwi Kai Imports Inc Kiwi Kai Imports Inc Kiwi Kai Imports Inc Kiwi Kai Imports Inc Kiwi Kai Imports Inc Kiwi Kai Imports Inc $50.16 KLEVE HEATING $50.16* 34628 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 5337 Prof. Serv. AC 121399 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES Merchandise 082969 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6298 Burro Bucks Cards 06220002 ED ADMINISTRAT PRINTING 2222 1/2 Sprint Charges 4/ 120999 INSPECTIONS TELEPHONE CM1110 PD instead of CM1110A COST OF GOODS SOLD WI CM1124 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 120670 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 120676 -COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 120677 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 120678 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 120679 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 120755 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 121146 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 121147 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 121147 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 121149 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 121165 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 121168 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 121248 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE Job Cancelled 99000317 GENERAL FD PRO MECHAN PERMITS $5,428.71 Knish Construction Compa Contract Payment #3 122199 SIDEWALK -CORNE CIP $5,428.71* 12/21/99 $1,889.90 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 254687 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/21/99 $2,167.75 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 255135 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 12/21/99 $2,831.20 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 255275 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/21/99 $475.10 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 255781 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 12/21/99 $28.90 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 255782 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 12/21/99 $2,279.65 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 255866 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/21/99 $28.90 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 255867 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE $9,701.40* 12/21/99 $264.89 Kurth, Robert Ambulance Overpayment 121399 GENERAL FD PRO AMBULANCE FEES $264.89* COUNCIL CHECK — LISTER 15- DEC -1999 (16:,_/ page 17 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 206066 12/21/99 $4,056.68 KUSTOM SIGNALS INC Equipt. Replace -Pro 18846 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP REPLACEM 4044 < *> $4,056.68* 206067 12/21/99 $52.68 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY INC Signs B1282010 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 3615 < *> $52.68* 206068 12/21/99 $534.61 LACAL EQUIPMENT INC Brackets, Scrapers, B 9912045 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5351 < *> $534.61* 206069 12/21/99 $57.03 LAND CARE EQUIPMENT CO Headlight Lens, Belt, 022334 STREET REVOLVI GENERAL SUPPLI 5448 < *> $57.03* 206070 12/21/99 $214.47 Lands' End Corporate Sal Coats 00964032 ASSESSING GENERAL SUPPLI 12/21/99 $354.28 Lands' End Corporate Sal Coats 00964032 INSPECTIONS GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $568.75* 206071 12/21/99 $227.30 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. Nylon Cable Tie, Ty -R 1201815 ST LIGHTING OR GENERAL SUPPLI 5266 12/21/99 $64.90 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. Stripe Paint 1201816 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 5270 12/21/99 $444.48 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. Washers, Nuts, Bolts 1201817 STREET NAME SI GENERAL SUPPLI 5268 12/21/99 $392.76 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. Hex Nuts, Lock Nuts,C 1202732 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 5265 12/21/99 $298.35 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. Screw Pin Anchor Shac 1207596 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 5330 12/21/99 $438.07 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. Protecting Agent, Pen 1207597 LIFT STATION M GENERAL SUPPLI 5334 12/21/99 $415.37 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. Heat Shrink /Tube /Bolt 1208665 ST LIGHTING OR GENERAL SUPPLI 5266 < *> $2,281.23* 206072 12/21/99 $359.61. LEITNER COMPANY Soil 167328 MAINT OF COURS SOD & DIRT 1317 12/21/99 $359.61 LEITNER COMPANY Soil 167374 MAINT OF LOURS SOD & DIRT 1317 12/21/99 $408.17 LEITNER COMPANY Topdressing 1.67380 MAINT OF LOURS SOD & DIRT 1317 < *> $1,127.39* 206073 12/21/99 $607.00 LIGHT CYCLE INC Recycling Haz. Materi L1056 -IN SUPERV. & OVRH HAZ. WASTE DIS 5287 < *> $607.00* 206074 12/21/99 $35.00 LINDQUIST, REID Replace Lost Check 121399 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F < *> $35.00* 206075 12/21/99 $17.61 LONG LAKE TRACTOR & EQUI Kit Filter 9823 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5296 12/21/99 $206.01 LONG LAKE TRACTOR & EQUI Tube Assem, Lamp Asse 9963 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5296 12/21/99 $321.71 LONG LAKE TRACTOR & EQUI Cable, Thermostat, Ga 9984 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5295 12/21/99 $31.92 LONG LAKE TRACTOR & EQUI Filter Element 10011 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5384 < *> $577.25* 206076 12/21/99 $126.97 LONG, JEFF Clothing Allowance Re 120999 POLICE DEPT. G UNIF ALLOW < *> $126.97* 206077 12/21/99 $36.00 M. SHANKEN COMMUNICATION Dues & Subscriptions 112299 LIQUOR 50TH ST DUES & SUBSCRI < *> $36.00* 206078 12/21/99 $150.00 M.I.A.M.A. Dues - Membership 120199 ARENA ADMINIST DUES & SUBSCRI 8093 < *> $150.00* 206079 12/21/99 $200.00 M.J.O.A. Continuing Education 112499 POLICE DEPT. G CON & SCHOOLS < *> $200.00* 206080 12/21/99 $208.00 M.R.P.A. Registration 13 Teams 121099 EDINA ATHLETIC PROF SERVICES COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER $2,551.45 MARK VII SALES COST 15- DEC -1999 (16:01) page 18 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT 976678 VENDOR CST DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <*> MARK $208.00* SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 976697 YORK SELLING 206081 12/21/99 $65.75 MacQueen Equipment Inc. Cable Throttle 2000401 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5190 OF 12/21/99 - $65.75 MacQueen Equipment Inc. Credit 2888 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 12/21/99 12/21/99 $717.51 MacQueen Equipment Inc. Dirt Shoe Runners 2000556 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5352 < *> CST $717.51* GDS MIX 12/21/99 $913.90 MARK VII SALES 206082 12/21/99 $9.58 Magnuson Sod /Haag Servic Sod 49678 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 5449 12/21/99 $95.85 Magnuson Sod /Haag Servic Sod 50115 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 5449 978999 12/21/99 $95.85 Magnuson Sod /Haag Servic Sod 52621 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 5449 SALES 12/21/99 $38.34 Magnuson Sod /Haag Servic Sod 52867 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 5449 MIX 12/21/99 $632.41 Magnuson Sod /Haag Servic Sod & Misc. 1132 GENERAL TURF C SOD & DIRT SOLD < *> 979001 $872.03* CST OF GDS BEE 12/21/99 $1,072.69 MARK 206083 12/21/99 $148.75 Mairs, Candyce GOODS Skating Lesson Pro 121399 POOL TRACK GRE PROF SERVICES CST < *> GDS $148.75* 12/21/99 $10.10 MARK VII SALES COST OF 206084 12/21/99 $16.00 MAMA < *> $16.00* 206085 12/21/99 $55.00 Marchuck, Doris < *> $55.00* MAMA Lunch 1270 ADMINISTRATION MEETING EXPENS Class Refund 113099 ART CNTR PROG REGISTRATION F 206088 12/21/99 $2,551.45 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 976678 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/21/99 $5,272.19 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 976697 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/21/99 $33.05 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 976698 YORK SELLING. CST OF GDS BEE 12/21/99 $49.40 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 976699 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 12/21/99 $913.90 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 978998 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 12/21/99 $67.70 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 978999 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 12/21/99 $9.00 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 979000 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 12/21/99 $17.00 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 979001 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 12/21/99 $1,072.69 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 979164 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/21/99 $10.10 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 979165 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 12/21/99 $27.00 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 979166 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 12/21/99 $1,239.95 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 979167 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/21/99 $15.20 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 979168 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/21/99 $18.00 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 979169 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 12/21/99 $1,773.40 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 979325 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/21/99 $691.95. MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 979326 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 12/21/99 $1,900.24 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 979352 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/21/99 $18.00 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 979353 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 12/21/99 $170.00 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 979354 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/21/99 $1,023.10 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 981443 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 12/21/99 $46.70 MARK VII.SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 981445 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 12/21/99 $802.20 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 981575 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/21/99 $10.10 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 981576 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/21/99 $7.75 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 981577 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 12/21/99 $1,960.85 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 981581 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/21/99. $66.90 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 981582 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 12/21/99 $15.00 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 981583 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $19,782.82* 206089 12/21/99 $490.39 MARLIN COMPANY, THE Employee Communicatio 05767M PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 5383 < *> $490.39* COUNCIL CHECK —GISTER 15- DEC -1999 (16:u_, page 19 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 206090 12/21/99 $17.30 Martin, Kim Art Supplies 120299 ED ADMINISTRAT GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $17.30* 206091 12/21/99 $56.51 MATHISON CO, THE Paper 186683 -1 ART SUPPLY GIF COST OF GD SOL 9097 12/21/99 $130.45 MATHISON CO, THE Gouache 187593 -0 ART SUPPLY GIF COST OF GD SOL 9103 < *> $186.96* 206092 12/21/99 $182.00 Matrix Communications In Phone Service 0039682- CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE < *> $182.00* 206093 12/21/99 $709.71 MCCAREN DESIGN Flowers - Purple Mums 11485 POOL TRACK GRE TREES FLWR SHR 2210 < *> $709.71* 206094 12/21/99 $669.60 MCNEILUS STEEL Steel Pipes 0157918 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 5293 < *> $669.60* 206095 12/21/99 $4.09 MDS Matrx Medical Inc Ambulance Supplies 685201 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 3622 12/21/99 $2,641.73 MDS Matrx Medical Inc Portable Oxygen 685530 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 3619 12/21/99 $55.79 MDS Matrx Medical Inc First Aid Supplies Pa 684728,6 SKATING & HOCK GENERAL SUPPLI CM951240 12/21/99 $43.06 MDS Matrx Medical Inc Ambulance Supplies 684728,6 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP < *> $2,744.67* 206096 12/21/99 $6,043.92 Medtronic Physio Control Lifepak 10 504437 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 3612 < *> $6,043.92* 206097 12/21/99 $21.26 MENARDS ACCT #35170288 Extension Cords 8663 POOL TRACK GRE GENERAL SUPPLI 2220 < *> $21.26* 206098 12/21/99 $749.94 MENARDS * ACCT #30240251 Y2K Materials 58592 GOLF ADMINISTR GENERAL SUPPLI 6258 12/21/99 $162.57 MENARDS * ACCT #30240251 LP Gas Tanks 58822 GOLF ADMINISTR SAFETY EQUIPME 6261 12/21/99 $47.24 MENARDS * ACCT #30240251 Paint /Tape 60578 GOLF DOME REPAIR PARTS 6301 12/21/99 $33.87 MENARDS * ACCT #30240251 Extension Cords, Bows 60751 POOL TRACK GRE GENERAL SUPPLI 2223 < *> $993.62* 206099 12/21/99 $34.38 MENARDS Decorations 76885 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI 2077 < *> $34.38* 206100 12/21/99 $100.00 MERFELD, BURT Police Service 120799 RESERVE PROGRA CONTR SERVICES < *> $100.00* 206101 12/21/99 $473.37 MERIT SUPPLY Mop Handle, Mophead, 52396 PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPLI 5264 12/21/99 $963.83 MERIT SUPPLY Cleaning Supplies 54200 ARENA BLDG /GRO CLEANING SUPPL 8083 12/21/99 $477.00 MERIT SUPPLY Motor, Cord Assy. 52417 POOL TRACK GRE REPAIR PARTS 2216 12/21/99 $112.04 MERIT SUPPLY Repair Scrubber 52459 ARENA BLDG /GRO CONTR REPAIRS 8086 12/21/99 $152.83 MERIT SUPPLY Lotion, Wypall 52479 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 5107 12/21/99 $450.39 MERIT SUPPLY Push Broom, LPS I,II 52480 PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPLI 5363 12/21/99 $870.17 MERIT SUPPLY Foam Buster, Cleaning 52501 POOL TRACK GRE GENERAL SUPPLI 2225 12/21/99 $198.09 MERIT SUPPLY LPS Spray 52509 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 3634 < *> $3,697.72* 206102 12/21/99 $1,751.40 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY Net Rails 39157 ATHLETIC ACTIV GENERAL SUPPLI 4544 < *> $1,751.40* 206103 12/21/99 $123.00 Metro Volley Ball Offici Officiating Fees 1736 EDINA ATHLETIC PROF SERVICES < *> $123.00* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 15- DEC -1999 (16:01) page 20 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.---- 206104 12/21/99 $270.00 MEUWISSEN, MARY Prof. Serv. AC 121399 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES 12/21/99 $24.85 MEUWISSEN, MARY Craft Supplies 121399 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES < *> $294.85* 206105 12/21/99 $87.60 Midland Heating & Air Co Job Cancelled .5543 MAL GENERAL FD PRO MECHAN PERMITS < *> $87.60* 206106 12/21/99 $21,963.28 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORPORAT Contract Payment #5 122199 STRT RESURFACI CIP < *> $21,963.28* 206107 12/21/99 $255.73 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 65115178 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 12/21/99 $164.00 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI Juice, Coke, Lids 66438154 CENTENNIAL LAK COST OF GD SOL CONTRACT 12/21/99 $152.37 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 62196262 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $572.10* 206108 12/21/99 $47.93 MIKE'S PRO SHOP Trophies for Volleyba 94395 EDINA ATHLETIC GENERAL SUPPLI.7046 < *> $47.93* 206109 12/21/99 $670.61 MILLIPORE Lab Supplies 2448937 LABORATORY GENERAL SUPPLI 5283 < *> $670.61* 206110 12/21/99 $179.95 MINN COMM PAGING Lost Pager 30343012 POOL TRACK GRE SVC CONTR EQUI 2233 < *> $179.95* 206111 12/21/99 $405.00 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN S Dig up Stop Box 31642 DISTRIBUTION CONTR REPAIRS 5485 < *> $405.00* 206112 12/21/99 $35.00 MINNEAPOLIS AREA ASSOC 0 Terminal Fee 5036373, ASSESSING CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $35.00* 206113 12/21/99 $10.00 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF Pesticide Applicator 120999 ED ADMINISTRAT DUES & SUBSCRI < *> $10.00* 206114 12/21/99 $30.00 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF Pesticide License Ren 12/10 GENERAL TURF C LIC & PERMITS 5237 < *> $30.00* 206115 12/21/99 $18,111.00 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF Connection Fee 111299 WATER TREATMEN PRO SVC OTHER < *> $18,111.00* 206116 12/21/99 $35.02 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF Concrete & Bituminous 113099 STRT RESURFACI CIP 12/21/99 $35.02 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF Inspections 113099 SKYLINE DRIVE CIP 12/21/99 $35.02 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 113099 ST MILL OVERLA CIP 12/21/99 $35.02 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 113099 Rosemary La Re CIP 12/21/99 $35.01 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 113099 Eden Prairie R CIP < *> $175.09* 206117 12/21/99 $76.00 MINNESOTA ELEVATOR INC Elevator Service Mont 7134 POOL TRACK GRE SVC CONTR EQUI CONTRACT < *> $76.00* 206118 12/21/99 $192.55 Minnesota Mattress Compa Rollaway Bed 31495 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 3625 < *> $192.55* 206119 12/21/99 $292.07 MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPME Rubber Valve Seat 0083022 PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPLI 5197 12/21/99 $647.52 MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPME Repair Clamps 0083313 PUMP & LIFT ST REPAIR PARTS 5357 < *> $939.59* COUNCIL CHECK __- SISTER 15- DEC -1999 (16:__, page 21 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.-- 206120 12/21/99 $75.00 Minnesota State Board of Electrical Permits 112999 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLI 12/21/99 $90.00 Minnesota State Board of Elec. Maint,. Fee. 112999 CITY HALL GENE GENERAL SUPPLI 12/21/99 $90.00 Minnesota State Board of Elec. Maint. Fee 112999 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 12/21/99 $90.00 Minnesota State Board of Elec. Maint. Fee 112999 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 12/21/99 $90.00 Minnesota State Board of Elec. Maint. Fee 112999 PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPLI 12/21/99 $90.00 Minnesota State Board of Elec. Maint. Fee 112999 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI 12/21/99 $90.00 Minnesota State Board of Elec. Maint. Fee 112999 MAINT OF LOURS GENERAL SUPPLI 12/21/99 $90.00 Minnesota State'Board of Elec. Maint. Fee 112999 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 12/21/99 $90.00 Minnesota State Board of Elec. Maint. Fee 112999 50TH ST OCCUPA GENERAL SUPPLI 12/21/99 $90.00 Minnesota State Board of Elec. Maint. Fee 112999 YORK OCCUPANCY GENERAL SUPPLI 12/21/99 $90.00 Minnesota State Board of Elec. Maint. Fee 112999 VERNON OCCUPAN GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $975.00* 206121 12/21/99 $45.65 MINVALCO Crown Spring, Termina 213274 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 5271 12/21/99 $147.72 MINVALCO Fan, Steel Hub, Gas V 213918 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI 5276 < *> $193.37* 206122 12/21/99 $92.66 Mitchell /Repair Informat Windows Program 5654322 EQUIPMENT OPER DATA PROCESSIN < *> $92.66* 206123 12/21/99 $38.80 Mohler Chimney Repair Duplicate Permit 99002653 GENERAL FD PRO BUILDING PERMI < *> $38.80* 206124 12/21/99 $51.57 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO Belt No Cog I304996 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5825 12/21/99 $99.86 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO Belt No Cog I305478 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5825 12/21/99 $40.74 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO Irrigation Parts -Lewi I307335 FIELD MAINTENA REPAIR PARTS 5804 12/21/99 $131.79 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO Blade Lift & Skid I309289 CENTENNIAL LAK REPAIR PARTS 2080 12/21/99 $161.69 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO Reel Motor I312483 CENTENNIAL LAK REPAIR PARTS 2077 < *> $485.65* 206125 12/21/99 $96.83 MUNICILITE CO Handle Grip Pinion 11761 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5188 < *> $96.83* 206126 12/21/99 $1,104.74 Napa Auto Parts Repair Parts 113099 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 12/21/99 - $400.00 Napa Auto Parts Labor Claim 049287 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS < *> $704.74* 206127 12/21/99 $15.00 NATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUND Dues for Tom Horwath 120899 GENERAL TURF C LIC & PERMITS < *> $15.00* 206128 12/21/99 $29.00 National Geographic Soci Dues 112099 ADMINISTRATION DUES & SUBSCRI < *> $29.00* 206129 12/21/99 $713.00 New France Wine Co COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 9092 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $713.00* 206130 12/21/99 $100.00 NISSEN, DICK Police Service 120799 RESERVE PROGRA CONTR SERVICES < *> $100.00* 206131 12/21/99 $40.80 NORTH STAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 56675 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 12/21/99 $114.82 NORTH STAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 56678 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 12/21/99 $112.20 NORTH STAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 57763 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 12/21/99 $10.20 NORTH STAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 58634 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX < *> $278.02* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 15- DEC -1999 (16:01) page 22 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------- 206132 12/21/99 $7.76 NORTH STAR INTERNATIONAL Resistor 257842 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5186 12/21/99 $54.96 NORTH STAR INTERNATIONAL Cable 258937 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5304 12/21/99 - $25.39 NORTH STAR INTERNATIONAL Credit 259846 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS < *> $37.33* 206133 12/21/99 $2,996.96 NORTH STAR TURF Repair Parts 217183 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 6256 < *> $2,996.96* 206134 12/21/99 $3,201.37 Northwest Electronic Tec 1/2 Sound Equipt.. 10199901 CENT SVC GENER EQUIP REPLACEM 4346 12/21/99 $2,120.27 Northwest Electronic Tec Sound Equipt. Install 11309907 CENT SVC GENER EQUIP REPLACEM 4346 < *> $5,321.64* 206135 12/21/99 $45.90 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY Tape, Wrap, Blue Cove 16654100 ART SUPPLY GIF COST OF GD SOL 9102 < *> $45.90* 206136 12/21/99 $92.34 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO Tires NW -59541 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES 5172 12/21/99 $494.55 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO Retread Tires NW -59594 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES 5172 12/21/99 $139.78 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO Floor -Clay Dry NW -59642 SUPERV. & OVRH HAZ. WASTE DIS 5172 < *> $726.67* 206139 12/21/99 $32,470.44 NSP LIGHT & POWER 12/21/99 ST LIGHTING RE LIGHT & POWER 12/21/99 $43.58 NSP LIGHT & POWER 12/21/99 ST LIGHTING OR LIGHT & POWER 12/21/99 $3,909.01 NSP LIGHT & POWER 12/21/99 TRAFFIC SIGNAL LIGHT & POWER 12/21/99 $3;280.30 NSP LIGHT & POWER 12/21/99 PARKING RAMP LIGHT & POWER 12/21/99 $580.60 NSP LIGHT & POWER 12/21/99 FIRE DEPT. GEN LIGHT & POWER 12/21/99 $103.86 NSP LIGHT & POWER 12/21/99 YORK FIRE STAT LIGHT & POWER 12/21/99 $52.76 NSP LIGHT & POWER 12/21/99 CIVIL DEFENSE LIGHT & POWER 12/21/99 $1,840.10 NSP LIGHT ,& POWER 12/21/99 CITY HALL GENE LIGHT & POWER 12/21/99 $3,088.10 NSP LIGHT & POWER 12/21/99 PW BUILDING LIGHT & POWER 12/21/99 $5,678.81 NSP LIGHT & POWER 12/21/99 BUILDING MAINT LIGHT & POWER 12/21/99 $3,361.90 NSP LIGHT & POWER 12/21/99 CLUB HOUSE LIGHT & POWER 12/21/99 $514.50 NSP LIGHT & POWER 12/21/99 MAINT OF COURS LIGHT & POWER 12/21/99 $368.36 NSP LIGHT & POWER 12/21/99 FRED RICHARDS LIGHT & POWER 12/21/99 $945.36 NSP LIGHT_& POWER 12/21/99 GOLF DOME LIGHT & POWER 12/21/99 $564.68 NSP LIGHT & POWER 12/21/99 POOL OPERATION LIGHT &_POWER 12/21/99 $14,138.76 NSP LIGHT & POWER 12/21/99 ARENA BLDG /GRO LIGHT & POWER 12/21/99 $821.67 NSP LIGHT & POWER 12/21/99 ART CENTER BLD LIGHT & POWER 12/21/99 $7,423.76 NSP LIGHT & POWER 12/21/99 POOL TRACK GRE LIGHT & POWER 12/21/99 $2,085.09 NSP LIGHT & POWER 12/21/99 CENTENNIAL LAK LIGHT & POWER 12/21/99 $2,477.04 NSP LIGHT & POWER 12/21/99 PUMP & LIFT ST LIGHT & POWER 12/21/99 $17,948.50 NSP LIGHT & POWER 12/21/99 DISTRIBUTION LIGHT & POWER 12/21/99 $44.18 NSP LIGHT & POWER 12/21/99 TANKS TOWERS & LIGHT & POWER 12/21/99 $649.80 NSP LIGHT & POWER 12/21/99 50TH ST OCCUPA LIGHT & POWER 12/21/99 $1,043.26 NSP LIGHT & POWER 12/21/99 YORK OCCUPANCY LIGHT & POWER 12/21/99 $643.41 NSP LIGHT & POWER 12/21/99 VERNON OCCUPAN LIGHT & POWER 12/21/99 $137.79 NSP LIGHT & POWER 12/21/99 GENERAL STORM LIGHT & POWER 12/21/99 $189.08 NSP LIGHT & POWER 12/21/99 PONDS & LAKES LIGHT &.POWER 12/21/99 $197.94 NSP LIGHT & POWER 12/21/99 AQUATIC WEEDS LIGHT & POWER 12/21/99 $7.76 NSP LIGHT & POWER 122199 PW BUILDING LIGHT & POWER < *> $104,610.40* 206140 12/21/99 $150.00 NYHLENS FILTER RECYCLING 55 Gal. Drums, Used 0 8428 SUPERV. & OVRH HAZ. WASTE DIS 5307 < *> $150.00* 206141 12/21/99 $177.05 Olsen Chain & Cable Co I Tools 125788 SEWER TREATMEN TOOLS 5275 COUNCIL CHECK _- _jISTER 15- DEC -1999 (16:%._, page 23 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------_------------------------ 206141 12/21/99 $34.56 Olsen Chain & Cable Co I Repair Parts 6321 MAINT OF LOURS REPAIR PARTS 6257 12/21/99 $176.79 Olsen Chain & Cable Co I Coil Chain, .,Ratchet P 126731 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5317 < *> $388.40* 206142 12/21/99 $145.00 Olsen Fire Inspection Contract Work 9911176 BUILDING MAINT PROF SERVICES 5236 < *> $145.00* 206143 12/21/99 $25.00 PACER Advertising 121399 ART CENTER ADM ADVERT OTHER < *> $25.00* 206144 12/21/99 $7.43 Paging Network of Minnes Pager 064 -A346 CITY HALL GENE GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $7.43* 206145 12/21/99 $75.00 PAUL KLITZKE R.P.T. Piano Tune 501390 CLUB HOUSE GENERAL SUPPLI 6295 < *> $75.00* 206146 12/21/99 $69.80 Paul's Roofing, Inc. Job Cancelled 99001942 GENERAL FD PRO BUILDING PERMI < *> $69.80* 206147 12/21/99 $250.00 COURTNEY, C WAYNE Core Drilled Holes 47140 GENERAL STORM CONTR REPAIRS 5481 < *> $250.00* 206148 12/21/99 $179.10 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 32655177 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 12/21/99 $165.60 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 32655340 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $344.70* 206149 12/21/99 $955.00 PERKINS LANDSCAPE CONTRA Fabric - Rip Rap 11/19 GENERAL STORM CONTR REPAIRS 5981 12/21/99 $395.00 PERKINS LANDSCAPE CONTRA Clearing.Trees & Brus 111999 GENERAL STORM CONTR REPAIRS 5980 12/21/99 $2,217.00 PERKINS LANDSCAPE CONTRA Paver Stone Repair 121799 MAINT OF.COURS CONTR REPAIRS 4547 < *> $3,567.00* 206150 12/21/99 $438.58 PERSONNEL DECISIONS Prof. Serv. - Hiring J129604 POLICE DEPT. G PROF SERVICES 12/21/99 $1,420.98 PERSONNEL DECISIONS Prof. Services - Hiri J130225 POLICE DEPT. G PROF SERVICES 12/21/99 $1,085.00 PERSONNEL DECISIONS Prof. Serv. - Hiring J131682 POLICE DEPT. G PROF SERVICES < *> $2,944.56* 206153 12/21/99 - $41.95 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 3204904 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 - $23.40 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 3204906 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 - $63.60 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 3204907 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 -$6.41 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 3204908 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 -$3.79 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 3205171 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 - $25.08 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 3205172 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 - $25.15 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 3205610 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 $285.90 PHILLIPS WINE.& SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 557985 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 $34.85 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 557986 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 12/21/99 $255.25 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 557987 50TH ST SELLIN.CST OF GD LIQU 12/21/99 $2,260.01 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 557988 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 $1,221.55 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 557989 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 12/21/99 $3,879.75 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 557990 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 $382.82 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 557991. VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 12/21/99 $1,909.25 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 557992 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 $102.40 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 560386 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 12/21/99 $47.15 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 560387 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 12/21/99 $1,814.25 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 560388 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 $63.00 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 560389 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 15- DEC -1999 (16:01) page 24 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM --------------------------------------------------------------7---------------------------------------------7----------------------- 206153 12/21/99 $1,200.40 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 560390 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 $1,951.05 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 560392 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 12/21/99 $2,429.40 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 560393 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 $2,039.19 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 560394 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 12/21/99 $1,467.85 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 560395 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 $1,467.90 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 560891 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU < *> $22,622.59* 206154 12/21/99 $64.63 Ping Clubs 4186132 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 8025 < *> $64.63* 206155 12/21/99 $81.47 Pinkerton Systems Integr Repair Camera 0014933- POOL TRACK.GRE CONTR REPAIRS 2232 < *> $81.47 *. 206156 12/21/99 $693.09 Pinnacle Distributing COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 590905 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 12/21/99 $613.13 Pinnacle Distributing COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 590966 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 12/21/99 $453.19 Pinnacle Distributing COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 591088 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 12/21/99 $613.14 Pinnacle Distributing COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 591155 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 12/21/99 $933.04 Pinnacle Distributing COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 591187 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX < *> $3,305.59* 206157 12/21/99 $178.97 PLANT & FLANGED EQUIPMEN Flanges 23657 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLI 5336 < *> $178.97* 206158 12/21/99 $422.01 PONY EXPRESS RELOADERS Explorers - Ammo 120999 RESERVE PROGRA GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $422.01* 206159 12/21/99 $48.00 Porthan, Todd Explorers Acct - safety 120799 RESERVE PROGRA GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $48.00* 206160 12/21/99 $920.00 POSTMASTER Bulk Mail 121399 CENT SVC GENER POSTAGE < *> $920.00* 206161 12/21/99 $1,704.01 Prime Equipment Compressor Rental 2347752 MAINT OF COURS PROF SERVICES 6240 < *> $1,704.01* 206162 12/21/99 $530.37 Print Shop, The Printing Newsletter 9796 SENIOR CITIZEN GENERAL SUPPLI 4490 < *> $530.37* 206163 12/21/99 $36.00 PRINTERS SERVICE INC Ice Knife Sharpening 158548 SKATING RINK M CONTR REPAIRS 5115 12/21/99 $128.00 PRINTERS SERVICE INC Blade Sharpening 16034 ARENA ICE MAIN EQUIP MAINT 8089 < *> $164.00* 206164 12/21/99 $250.94 PRIOR LAKE AGGREGATE Buckshot Rock 1199107 PATHS & HARD S SAND,GRVL & RO 5103 < *> $250.94* 206166 12/21/99 -$8.44 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 523164 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 $902.85 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 141736 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 $722.28 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 141737 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 $902.85 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 141738 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 $3,569.70 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 142841 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 $1,282.77 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 142846 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 $2,338.14 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 142852 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 $68.19 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 142853 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 $163.50 -PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 144750 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE COUNCIL J CHECK i.jISTER 15- DEC -1999 (16:u_, page 25 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 206166 12/21/99 $1,745.21 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 146507 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 $658.58 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 146514 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 $1,928.56 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST.OF GOODS SOLD WI 146521 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 $290.00 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 148361 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $14,564.19* 206167 12/21/99 $119.05 PRO GUARD General.Supply 158579 ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $119.05* 206168 12/21/99 $3,524.86 PROGRESSIVE CONSULTING E Consulting Design 99022.07 GENERAL(BILLIN PROF SERVICES < *> $3,524.86* 206169 12/21/99 $265.93 R &R SPECIALTIES INC Repair Zamboni 00011479 ARENA ICE MAIN CONTR REPAIRS 8084 < *> $265.93* 206170 12/21/99 $2,600.00 RAYMOND HAEG PLUMBING Plumbing - 5146 Eden 11/26 ST PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 5295 < *> $2,600.00* 206171 12/21/99 $1,023.00 RECREATION SPORTS OFFICI Officiating NOV. 99 EDINA ATHLETIC PROF SERVICES < *> $1,023.00* 206172: 12/21/99 $17.97 Red Rooster Auto Stores Shop Supplies 8595512 MAINT OF LOURS GENERAL SUPPLI 6260 < *> $17.97* 206173. 12/21/99 $290.70 RED WING SHOES Safety Shoes 1209 EQUIPMENT OPER SAFETY EQUIPME 12/21/99 $531.25 RED WING SHOES Safety Shoes 1209 BUILDING MAINT SAFETY EQUIPME < *> $821.95* 206175 12/21/99 $574.51 MINNEGASCO HEAT 112699 FIRE DEPT. GEN HEAT 12/21/99 $486.43 MINNEGASCO HEAT 112699 CITY HALL GENE HEAT 12/21/99 $3,042.29 MINNEGASCO HEAT 112699 PW BUILDING HEAT 12/21/99 $1,593.94 MINNEGASCO HEAT 112699 BUILDING MAINT HEAT 12/21/99 $342.02 MINNEGASCO HEAT 112699 ART CENTER BLD HEAT 12/21/99 $37.28 MINNEGASCO HEAT 112699 POOL OPERATION HEAT 12/21/99 $358.11 MINNEGASCO HEAT 112699 CLUB HOUSE HEAT 12/21/99 $97.75 MINNEGASCO HEAT 112699 MAINT OF LOURS HEAT 12/21/99 $123.54 MINNEGASCO HEAT 112699 GOLF DOME HEAT 12/21/99 $42.18 MINNEGASCO HEAT 112699 FRED RICHARDS HEAT 12/21/99 $3,067.90 MINNEGASCO HEAT 112699 ARENA BLDG /GRO HEAT 12/21/99 $1,267.95 MINNEGASCO HEAT 112699 POOL TRACK GRE HEAT 12/21/99 $285.13 MINNEGASCO HEAT 112699 CENTENNIAL LAK HEAT 12/21/99 $521.03 MINNEGASCO HEAT 112699 PUMP & LIFT ST HEAT 12/21/99 $1,625.54 MINNEGASCO HEAT 112699 DISTRIBUTION HEAT 12/21/99 $10.12 MINNEGASCO HEAT 112699 50TH ST OCCUPA HEAT 12/21/99 $27.20 MINNEGASCO HEAT 112699 YORK OCCUPANCY HEAT 12/21/99 $24.52 MINNEGASCO HEAT 112699 VERNON OCCUPAN HEAT < *> $13,527.44* 206176 12/21/99 $203.00 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED Ultra Hitch Receiver 1136132- EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 5288 12/21/99 $166.17 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED Replacement Balls, Pi 1140969- EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5390 < *> $369.17* 206177 12/21/99 $19.25 RMA Nov. Coll. Letters 55187701 GENERAL FD PRO AMBULANCE FEES < *> $19.25* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 15- DEC -1999 (16:01) page 26 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------,--.-- 206178 12/21/99 $41.27 ROBERT B. HILL Salt 00093203 FIRE.DEPT. GEN.GENERAL SUPPLI 9766 < *> $41.27* 206179 12/21/99 $17.52 ROBINSON, JAMES E UPS Two Sets of Books 120899 CENT SVC GENER POSTAGE 12/21/99 $180.00 ROBINSON, JAMES E NFA Meal Ticket 120899 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $197.52* 206180 12/21/99 $31.94 Robson, Bob General Supplies 120999 POLICE DEPT.. G GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $31.94* 206181 12/21/99 $3,576.95 Ron Kassa Construction I Contract Payment #3 122199 SIDEWALK -MAPLE CIP < *> $3,576.95* 206182 12/21/99 $271.49 RUBENSTEIN & ZIFF Craft Sup. Mat. 429931 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES 9095 < *> $271.49* 206183 12/21/99 $199.71 Rudy, Murial Ambulance Overpayment 120199 GENERAL FD PRO AMBULANCE FEES < *> $199.71 *. 206184 12/21/99 $1,652.78 RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON EQ CO Impellor, Key, Washer C15687 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5048 < *> $1,652.78* 206185 12/21/99 $1,262.73 SA -AG INC Gravel 5110 SNOW & ICE REM SAND,GRVL & RO 1763 < *> $1,262.73* 206186 12/21/99 $68.20 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT COMMER Batteries, Coffe, Cre 005627 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 5453 < *> $68.20* 206187 12/21/99 $140.00 SANDERS WACKER WEHRMAN B Landscape Architectur 9660 -26 STREET IMPROVE CIP 12/21/99 $140.00 SANDERS WACKER WEHRMAN B Landscape Architectur 9520 -10 UTILITIES -GRAN CIP < *> $280.00* 20.6188 12/21/99 $79.34 SCHAFER EQUIP CO Floats, Broom, Brushe 196024 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 5347 12/21/99 $116.14 SCHAFER EQUIP CO Screen 196177 GENERAL MAINT TOOLS 5381 < *> $195.48* 206189 12/21/99 $68.33 SCHARBER & SONS Thermostat, Gasket, B 216641 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5175 12/21/99 $19.23 SCHARBER & SONS Cover, O -Ring 216772 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5175 12/21/99 $72.70 SCHARBER & SONS Water Kit 216889 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5181 12/21/99 $10.52 SCHARBER & SONS Water Kit 217496 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5181 12/21/99 $85.47 SCHARBER & SONS Arm, Wiper Blades 217537 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5292 12/21/99 $62.84 SCHARBER & SONS Wiper Arm 217796 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5305 < *> $319.09* 206190 12/21/99 $92.00 Schlauderaff, Paul Job Cancelled 99001142. GENERAL FD PRO BUILDING PERMI < *> $92.00* 206191 12/21/99 $10.05 SEELYE PLASTICS Tubing, PVC Plugs 547419 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 5345 < *> $10.05* 206192 12/21/99 $1,144.76 SEH Consulting Design 0059173 TH100 & W 77TH CIP < *> $1,144.76* 206193 12/21/99 $150.00 SEIDEL, ROXANNE Press Releases.for Cu CALENDAR ED ADMINISTRAT PROF SERVICES < *> $150.00* COUNCIL CHECK _._GISTER 15- DEC -1999 (16. , page 27 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 206194 12/21/99 $75.00 Severson, Jo Teaching AC 121399 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $75.00* 206195 12/21/99 $100.00 SHEPARD, JOHN Police Service 120799 RESERVE PROGRA CONTR SERVICES < *> $100.00* 206196 12/21/99 $320.68 SHERWIN WILLIAMS Paint 3213 -5 ARENA BLDG /GRO PAINT 8081 12/21/99 $96.65 SHERWIN WILLIAMS Toluene 3299 -4 STREET.NAME SI GENERAL SUPPLI 5321 12/21/99 $65.60 SHERWIN WILLIAMS Paiant 2984 -6 PAVEMENT MARKI GENERAL SUPPLI 5342 < *> $482.93* 206197 12/21/99 $152.58 SIMS SECURITY Security 00118365 POOL TRACK GRE PROF SERVICES CONTRACT < *> $152.58* 206198 12/21/99 $79.98 SMITH, AMY Mileage Reimbursement 121399 GOLF ADMINISTR MILEAGE < *> $79.98* 206199 12/21/99 $307.51 SNELL MECHANICAL Rooftop Unit 009466 CITY HALL GENE CONTR REPAIRS 4559 < *> $307.51* 206200 12/21/99 $1,208.65 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 101730 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 12/21/99 $3,298.85 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 101733 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/21/99 $36.60 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 406448 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 12/21/99 $728.55 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 101954 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 12/21/99 $10.15 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 101955 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 12/21/99 $5,045.35 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 101958 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/21/99 - $24.30 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 406564 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE < *> $10,303.85* 206201 12/21/99 $183.33 SOUTHWEST JOURNAL Advertising 113099 50TH ST SELLIN ADVERT.OTHER 12/21/99 $183.33 SOUTHWEST JOURNAL Advertising 113099 YORK SELLING ADVERT OTHER 12/21/99 $183.34 SOUTHWEST JOURNAL Advertising 113099 VERNON SELLING ADVERT OTHER < *> $550.00* 206202 12/21/99 $28.46 Speedway SuperAmerica LL LP Gas - Bulk 82735 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 5159 < *> $28.46* - 206203 12/21/99 $105.00 Speedy Lock & Key Change Locks on Polic 993906 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 5056 < *> $105.00* 206204 12/21/99 $126.38 SPS Galvanized Pipe 3386819 FIELD MAINTENA GENERAL SUPPLI 5121 12/21/99 $15.44 SPS Countersink-Plug 3389624 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 5372 < *> $141.82* 206205 12/21/99 $1,000.00 ST. CLOUD STATE UNIVERSI Cont. Ed. - Reserves 120999 RESERVE PROGRA CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $1,000.00* 206206 12/21/99 $28.26 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO Set Key, Switch & Key SI83559 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5297 < *> $28.26* 206207 12/21/99 $100.00 STAN BANN BIG BAND Replace Lost Check 121399 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $100.00* 206208 12/21/99 $569.40 STAR TRIBUNE. AD BNPY0020 GOLF DOME ADVERT OTHER 6296- 12/21/99 $200.00 STAR TRIBUNE 50th & France Adverti 120799 50TH ST SELLIN ADVERT OTHER COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 15- DEC -1999 (16:01) page 28 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT _ PO NUM --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.---------------- 206208 12/21/99 $100.00 STAR TRIBUNE 50th & France Adverti 120799 YORK SELLING ADVERT OTHER 12/21/99 $100.00 STAR TRIBUNE 50th & France Adverti 120799 VERNON SELLING ADVERT OTHER < *> $969.40* 206209 12/21/99 $100.00 Stouten, Jaqueline Art Work Sold 121399 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $100.00* 206210 12/21/99 $86.45 STREICHERS Equip. Maintenance.. 140897.1 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP MAINT 3080 <*> $86.45* 206211 12/21/99 $30.99 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET Valve 93285CVW EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5318 12/21/99 $54.86 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET Calibration 94185CVW EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5393 < *> $85.85* 206212 12/21/99 $312.30 SUBURBAN PROPANE L.P. Fuel STMT 11/ ARENA ICE MAIN GASOLINE 8085 12/21/99 $600.00 SUBURBAN PROPANE 100M BTU Radiant Heat 183222 CITY HALL GENE GENERAL SUPPLI 12/21/99 $1,700.00 SUBURBAN PROPANE GENERAL SUPPLIES 183222 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 12/21/99 $1,176.16 SUBURBAN PROPANE GENERAL SUPPLIES 183222 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $3,788.46* 206213 12/21/99 $91.65 Sun Newspapers Ad for Bid -Golf Cars 275514 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LE 12/21/99 $405.60 Sun Newspapers Publish Ord 99 -12 279490 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LE 12/21/99 $72.80 Sun Newspapers Publish Ord 99 -11 279491 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LE 12/21/99 $54.60 Sun Newspapers Publish Ord 99 -13 279492 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LE 12/21/99 $330.00 Sun Newspapers Truth In Taxation Hea 279926 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LE 12/21/99 $192.40 Sun Newspapers Add for Bid 281308 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LE 12/21/99 $35.10 Sun Newspapers Notice of Aeration -In 281310 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LE 12/21/99 $35.10 Sun Newspapers Notice of Aeration -Ar 281313 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LE 12/21/99 $29.90 Sun Newspapers Public Hearing Plan I 283274 ADMINISTRATION MEMBERSHIPS < *> $1,247.15* 206214 12/21/99 $100.00 SWANSON, HAROLD Police Service 120799 RESERVE PROGRA CONTR SERVICES < *> $100.00* 206215 12/21/99 $51.61 SWENSON, THOMAS Computer Cord 120299 GOLF ADMINISTR OFFICE SUPPLIE < *> $51.61* 206216 12/21/99 $106.47 TARGET Christmas Decorations 82426 LIQUOR YORK GE GENERAL SUPPLI 4373 < *> $106.47* 206217 12/21/99 $500.00 TeeMaster Inc Computer Reservations 3370 GOLF ADMINISTR SVC CONTR EQUI 6303. 12/21/99 $100.00 TeeMaster Inc Computer Reservations 3371 RANGE PROF SERVICES 6303 < *> $600.00* 206218 12/21/99 $2,405.55 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 179192 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/21/99 $3,336.55 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 179830 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/21/99 $12.10 THORPE.DISTRIBUTING COMP COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 179831 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $5,754.20* 206219 12/21/99 $872.20 TILE SHOP, THE Porcelain Tiles, Grou 00003782 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 5344 < *> $872.20* 206220 12/21/99 $8,607.47 TKDA Engineers Architect Sanitary Sewer Design 045458 SANITARY SEWER CIP 12/21/99 $5,044.56 TKDA Engineers Architect Sanitary Sewer Design 045459 SANITARY SEWER CIP < *> $13,652.03* COUNCIL CHECK .,"GISTER 15- DEC -1999 (16:._) page 29 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 206221 12/21/99 $1,276.70 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPL Propane Fuel Gas 287086 PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPLI 5141 12/21/99 $282.75 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPL Rental Cylinders for 415880 PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPLI 5157 12/21/99 $11.70 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPL Welding Supplies 415881 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI CONTRACT < *> $1,571.15* 206222 12/21/99 $43.88 TROPHY WORLD Program Recog. 16705 HUMAN RELATION EDUCATION PRGM 4554 < *> $43.88* 206223 12/21/99 $270.40 TRUCK UTILITIES MFG CO Pillow Block Bearings 0061624 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5310 < *> $270.40* 206224 12/21/99 $985.13 Turtle Bay Building Sery Monthly Cleaning Sery 991218 POOL TRACK GRE PROF SERVICES CONTRACT < *> $985.13* 206225 12/21/99 $33.60 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO Oxygen - Station 2 (N 516850 FIRE. DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 9765 < *> $33.60* 206226 12/21/ -99 $10.60 TWIN CITY SAW SERVICE CO Air Filter Cover A2735 TREES & MAINTE REPAIR PARTS 5821 < *> $10.60* 206227 12/21/99 $61.49 U S BANCORP Meetings 120599 ADMINISTRATION MEETING EXPENS < *> $61.49* 206228 12/21/99 $390.00 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA City Engineers Assoc. 121099 ENGINEERING GE MEETING EXPENS < *> $390.00* 206229 12/21/99 $1,604.95 US FOODSERVICES INC Food for Resale 11/30 ST GRILL COST OF GD SOL 9044 12/21/99 $419.84 US FOODSERVICES INC Paper /Janitoral Suppl 11/30 ST GRILL CLEANING SUPPL 12/21/99 $28.44 US FOODSERVICES INC Containers 11/30 ST GRILL GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $2,053.23* 206230 12/21/99 $271.84 Vallen.Safety Supply Com Detachable Anti -Skid 2980634 SKATING RINK M GENERAL SUPPLI 5286 12/21/99 $190.93 Vallen Safety Supply Com Respirators, Cartridg 2997731 PUMP & LIFT ST SAFETY EQUIPME 5359 < *> $462.77* 206231 12/21/99 $208.07 Viking I.D. Products /Lab Licensing Labels 175881 ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLI 4512 < *> $208.07* 206232 12/21/99 $665.00 VineNet International In COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 403 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE < *> $665.00* 206233 12/21/99 $505.00 VINTAGE ONE WINES COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 3626 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $505.00* 206234 12/21/99 $151.40 VOGT HEATING & AIR CONDT Job Cancelled 99001396 GENERAL FD PRO MECHAN PERMITS < *> $151.40* 206235 12/21/99 $739.62 Wagner Greenhouse Inc Plants, Flowers, Poin XMASS POOL TRACK GRE TREES FLWR SHR 2127 < *> $739.62* 206236 12/21/99 $75.00 Wakely, Erin Undercover Liquor Com 120199 PRIMARY DISPAT PROF SERVICES < *> $75.00* 206237 12/21/99 $25.71 WALSER FORD Damper Assembly 79011FOW EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5300 12/21/99 $24.93 WALSER FORD Insulator 79198FOW EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5319 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 15- DEC -1999 (16:01) page 30 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <*> $50.64* 206238 12/21/99 $100.00 WALSH, WILLIAM Police Service 120799 RESERVE PROGRA CONTR SERVICES < *> $100.00* 206239 12/21/99 $629.96 WARNING LITES Safety Vests 33436 GENERAL MAINT SAFETY EQUIPME 5285 < *> $629.96* 206240 12/21/99 $163.92 WEARGUARD Uniform Pants 41461190 POOL TRACK GRE GENERAL SUPPLI 2213 12/21/99 $199.96 WEARGUARD Uniform Pants 41461190 POOL TRACK GRE GENERAL SUPPLI 2213 < *> $363.88* 206241 12/21/99 $129.16 WEST WELD SUPPLY CO._ Soapstone Holder, Cut-27849 EQUIPMENT OPER WELDING SUPPLI 5153 < *> $129.16* 206242 12/21/99 $17.32 WESTBURNE SUPPLY INC Limit Control, Temp. 1774122 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI 5328 12/21/99 $51.70 WESTBURNE SUPPLY INC Terminal Board 1776756 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI 5339 < *> $69.02* 206243 12/21/99 $232.41 WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT Pump Repair Kit, Labo 0003189- EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 5177 12/21/99 $290.00 WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT PC Software, Install 0003198- EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 5354 12/21/99. $291.25 WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT Volt Pump, Hose & Noz 0003387- PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 5180 < *> $813.66* 206244 12/21/99 $8,800.00 CHANDLER, JANET Removal of 40 Deer 121399 DEER CONTROL PROF SERVICES 5234 < *> $8,800.00* 206245 12/21/99 $154.55 WILLIAMS STEEL Paint, Whisk Brooms 885100 -0 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 5278. 12/21/99 $118.38 WILLIAMS STEEL Spray Paint 886088 -0 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 5355 < *> $272.93* 206246 12/21/99 - $80.64 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 030748 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 $240.00 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 031124 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 $1,867.63 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 031204 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 $742.54 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 031239 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 $767.75 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 031241 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 $35.00 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 031242 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/21/99 $38.00 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 031619 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/21/99 $945.11 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 031697 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 $579.13 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 031698 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 $2,253.97 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 031699 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 $288.00 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 031842 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 $404.00 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 031845 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE < *> $8,080.49* 206247 12/21/99 $358.10 WINE MERCHANTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 23876 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 $740.47 WINE MERCHANTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 23877 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 $599.70 WINE MERCHANTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 23878 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 $586.13 WINE MERCHANTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 23963 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 $760.90 WINE MERCHANTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 24164 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 $444.30 WINE MERCHANTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 24165 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 $332.60 WINE MERCHANTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 24166 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $3,822.20* 206248 12/21/99 $472.00 WISCONSIN STATE LAB OF H Quality Assurance Sam 652892 LABORATORY CONTR SERVICES 5870 COUNCIL CHECK 1, STER 15- DEC -1999 (16:0- page 31 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ < *> $472.00* 206249 12/21/99 $58.55 WM H MCCOY Kerosene 41891 MAINT OF COURS GASOLINE 6263 < *> $58.55* 206250 12/21/99 $672.53 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 87990 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 1 $1,139.00 WORLD. CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 87992 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 $435.00 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 88079 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 $1,067.60 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 88295 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99 $1,011.00 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 88296, YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/21/99. $1,250.35 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 88360 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE < *> $5,575.48* 206251 12/21/99 $100.00 WROBLESKI, HENRY Police Service 120799 RESERVE PROGRA CONTR SERVICES < *> $100.00* 206252 12/21/99 $205.00 YEADON FABRIC DOMES Freight 11098 GOLF DOME REPAIR PARTS 6297 < *> $205.00* 206253 12/21/99 $30.00 ZWERNIK, DON Prof. Serv. AC 121399 MEDIA LAB PROF SERVICES < *> $30.00* $808,701.47* b COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY 15- DEC -1999 (16:05) page 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ FUND # 10 GENERAL FUND $277,061.92 FUND # 15 WORKING CAPITAL $9,640.25 FUND # 23 ART CENTER $7,203.68 FUND # 25 GOLF DOME FUND $3,739.65 FUND # 26 SWIMMING POOL FUND $1,312.28 FUND # 27 GOLF COURSE FUND $28,672.62 FUND # 28 ICE ARENA FUND $20,926.75 FUND # 30 EDINBOROUGH /CENTENNIAL LAK $23,265.18 FUND # 40 UTILITY FUND $62,279.44 FUND # 41 STORM SEWER UTILITY FUND $4,095.23 FUND # 42 RECYCLING PROGRAM $35,092.44 FUND # 50 LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND $257,933.81 FUND # 60 CONSTRUCTION FUND $51,653.22 FUND # 61 PARK BOND FUND $25,825.00 $808,701.47*