HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999-04-05_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
APRIL 5,1999
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL
ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the
Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items
marked with an asterisk ( *) in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered routine and
will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a
Commissioner, Council Member or citizen so requests it. In such cases the item will be removed from
the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the Agenda.
I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA - Regular Meeting of March 15,1999
II. WMEP PROPOSAL
Rollcall III. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS -as per pre -list dated 3/31/99, TOTAL: $81,392.56
IV. ADJOURNMENT
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Minutes of March 15,1999
II. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS - Affidavits of Notice by
Clerk. Presentation by Planner Public Comment heard. Motion to close hearing. Zonin
Ordinances: First and Second Reading require 4/5 favorable rollcall of all members of Council
to pass. Waver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall of all members of Council to pass.
Final Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall
vote required to pass. Conditional Use Permit: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass.
A. Set Hearing Date (4/19/99):
1. Final Development Plan and Preliminary Plat Approval for Interlachen Corporate
Center. Haugland Company. Generally located southwest corner of Lincoln Drive
and 7th Street.
2. Conditional Use Permit Approval for Normandale Lutheran Church. 6100
Normandale Road
III. PUBLIC HEARINGS ON ISSUANCE OF ON -SALE INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICESENSES -
Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by staff. Public Comment heard. Motion to close
hearing. Action by motion. 3/5 favorable rollcall of all members of Council to pass.
Rollcall
A.
Argento, Inc. d.b.a. Two Guys From Italy
Rollcall
B.
Big Bowl, Inc. d.b.a. Big Bowl Caf@
Rollcall
C.
Chili's of Minnesota, Inc. d.b.a. Romano's Macaroni Grill -
Rollcall
D.
Cuisine Concepts LLC d.b.a. Tejas Restaurant
*
E.
Pantry Restaurant, Inc. d.b.a. Eden Avenue Grill - continue to 4/19/99
*
F.
RT Minneapolis Franchise LLC d.b.a. as Ruby Tuesday - continue to 4/19/99
Rollcall
G.
Sidney's of Edina, Inc. d.b.a. Sidney's
Rollcall
H.
VIP Restaurant Inc. d.b.a. Ciatti's
Agenda/Edina City Council
April 5,1999
Page 2
IV. AWARD OF BID
* A. One 25 Ton Tandem Axle Trailer, Public Works
* B. One 1/2 Ton Extended Cab Pickup, Utility Department
* C. One 3/4 Ton Pickup, Utility Department
* D. Two Dump Truck Bodies, Public Works
* E. One 1 Ton Cab and Chassis, Pubic Works
* F. One 1/2 Ton 4 x 4 Pickup, Public Works
* G. Contract PW99 -1, Well Repair - Well #10
H. Council Chamber Document Imaging System
* I. Articulating Loader, Park Department
* J. Two 4 -Wheel Drive Utility Vehicles, Fire Department
* K. One Half -Ton Extended Cab 4 x 4 Pickup, Police Department
* L. One Dodge Intrepid 4 -Door Intermediate Sedan, Police Department
V. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS
A. Receive Sanitary Sewer Phase II Feasibility Report
* B. Receive Feasibility Reports and Set Hearing Date for 1999 Street Reclamation Projects
(5/3/99)
VI. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS
VII. CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
VIII. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES
IX. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL
X. MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEM
XI. FINANCE
Rollcall A. RESOLUTION CALLING FOR BOND SALE - $3,600,000 General Obligation Utility
Revenue Bonds, Series 1999 A
Rollcall B. RESOLUTION CALLING FOR BOND SALE - $3,290,000 General Obligation Refunding
Bonds, Series 1999 B
Rollcall C. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS as per Pre -List dated 3/31/99 TOTAL: $1,406,816.58
SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS
Thurs
Apr 8
Strategic Planning Work Session
5:00 P.M.
CENTENNIAL LAKES CENTRUM
Mon
Apr 12
Board of Review
5:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Thurs
Apr 15
Strategic Planning Community Session
6:45 P.M.
BRAEMAR CLUBHOUSE
Mon
Apr 19
Regular Council Meeting
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Tues
Apr 20
VOLUNTEER RECOGNITION RECEPTION
5:00 P.M.
EDINBOROUGH PARK
Mon
May 3
Regular Council Meeting
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Mon
May 17
Regular Council Meeting
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Mon
May 31
MEMORIAL DAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed
Tues.
Jun 1
Regular Council Meeting
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Tues.
Jun 15
Regular Council Meeting
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY HELD AT CITY HALL
MARCH 151999 - 7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Faust, Hovland, Maetzold, and Chair Smith.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Maetzold and
seconded by Commissioner Faust to approve and adopt the. HRA Consent Agenda items as
presented.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Maetzold, Smith
Motion carried.
*MINUTES OF THE HRA MEETING OF MARCH 1 1999 APPROVED Motion made by
Commissioner Maetzold and seconded by Commissioner Faust approving the Minutes of the
Regular HRA Meeting of March 1, 1999.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
LETTER OF INTENT AUTHORIZED FOR KUNZ LEWIS REDEVELOPMENT Executive Director
Hughes noted that originally it was intended to have the West Metropolitan Education Program
(WMEP) presentation March 15, 1999, but WMEP asked to delay their presentation until April 5,
1999. The reason for the delay is because WMEP intends to hold a community meeting on March
24, 1999, regarding the magnet school component of the development. Executive Director Hughes
stated that WMEP had mailed a notice to the neighborhood residents and the Edina Sun Current
would also print an article announcing the time and place of the March .24, 1999, meeting scheduled
to be held in Room 350 of the Edina Community Center. He added that Frank Bennett was in
attendance both as a member of the Edina School Board and as Vice Chair of WMEP to provide an
update to the HRA regarding the funding prospects with the legislature.
Executive Director Hughes also noted that the HRA had been provided with a memo from Rusty
Fifield of Ehlers & Associates summarizing Ehlers' preliminary evaluation of the tax increment
financing issues associated with the proposed development.
Frank Bennett explained that Senator Terwilliger has confirmed that he would be sponsoring a bill
which will include $14,000,000 to construct a WMEP school, if approved, in Edina. Mr. Bennett
stated that Larry Pogemiller is cosponsoring the bill. Mr. Bennett reported that Senator Terwilliger
was confident there was bi- partisan support for the funding bill which will be part of a bonding bill,
although due to the usual politics it could end up in an omnibus budget bill. He promised to update
the HRA as more becomes known about the bill's status.
Mr. Bennett reiterated that the neighborhood meeting was scheduled for March 24, 1999 at 7:00 p.m.
in Room 350 of the Edina Community Center. Chair Smith asked how the district intends to publicize
the meeting. Mr. Bennett replied that the Beard Group, acting as the developer for the proposal, has
sent out notices and there will be announcements in the Edina Sun Current.
Chair Smith asked Mr. Bennett to keep Executive Director Hughes updated on the bill's status.
Commissioner Faust stated she thought that Senator Terwilliger's bill was going to be attached to the
"Waste Water Treatment Emergency Bonding Bill" and asked if this was correct. Mr. Bennett replied
that he would find out and let the City know how the bill was being presented.
Commissioner Hovland referred to page 2 of Ehlers' memo, and asked what makes up the
$6,330,000 HRA bond issue. Executive Director Hughes answered that the components would be:
land cost in excess of that paid by WMEP, the Senior Center's construction cost, the Public Library's
Minutes/Edina HRA/March 15, 1999
construction cost, any non - recoverable costs associated with the purchase and resale of the existing
school bus garage, and any other soft costs incidental to the transaction. He pointed out that the
$6,330,000 does not include the cost of additional gymnasiums (over the two included as part of the
WMEP School).
Commissioner Hovland asked how the purchase of the library would work. Executive Director
Hughes replied that when considering the construction of the new library, and the purchase and
renovation of the existing library, it will be important to distinguish the Edina HRA from the City of
Edina. He stated that Hennepin County, in consideration for the HRA constructing a new library,
would deed the existing library to the HRA. Under the provisions of the tax increment financing (TIF)
law, however, it would then be necessary for the City of Edina to acquire the existing library from the
HRA for use for other City purposes. The tax increment law does not allow the use of TIF funds for
buildings used for the regular conduct of government, necessitating the additional transaction
between the City and HRA. Additionally, City funds used to purchase the existing library cannot
come from TIF funds.
Commissioner Hovland noted that on page 3, paragraph 2 Ehlers notes "The HRA has the financial
resources to undertake this project if adjacent properties are developed with taxable uses..." He
asked that the "adjacent properties" be defined. Executive Director Hughes replied that he believed
the proposal WMEP intends to bring forward on April 5, 1999, is a proposal to develop Kunz
Oil /Lewis Engineering property with a public mixed use concept. At the same time the HRA will see
a proposal from Jerry's Enterprises to develop the existing school bus property and other properties
owned by Jerry's with a taxable use. It was Jerry's taxable portion of the proposed development that
Ehlers used to develop their preliminary analysis. However, the taxable'development need not occur
on those specific properties; it could take place anywhere within the tax increment district. He added
that without the taxable development occurring within the TIF district; there are not sufficient.
increments to finance the project.
Chair Smith pointed out that he, Commissioner Faust, and Executive Director Hughes attended a
meeting with the WMEP staff and the Edina. School Superintendent. He asked Executive Director
Hughes to summarize the proposal. Executive Director Hughes responded that the proposal they
saw included not only the Lewis Engineering /Kunz Oil Property, but also the building referred to as
the Tag property, and the Noonan - Construction Property. The developers have r concluded those
parcels are needed to provide enough area for the development. The proposal included the
elementary school proposed by WMEP, an approximately 20,000 square foot public library, a 15,000
square foot senior center, an approximately 300 seat performing arts lab, two gymnasiums, and a
bus garage (relocated from ,its current location). The developers presented a model depicting the
previously described uses.
Chair Smith pointed out the proposed development also includes a redevelopment of the existing bus
garage site, north of Eden Avenue. Executive Director Hughes agreed that the redevelopment was
discussed in general terms,'but no specific proposals were presented.
Commissioner Faust stated that the people behind the WMEP plan believe the WMEP proposal will
be good for the Metro community; however, she does not believe that the Edina HRA/City Council
can properly judge the proposal until they know all the details of the financial implications. They also
must compare the financial implications to the City with the benefits to come from WMEP. The
proposal does not come with many details; and Commissioner Faust .believes to properly assess
WMEP's proposal; the financial ramifications of allowing WMEP to develop the property as opposed
to another commercial venture must be made known. Commissioner Faust elaborated that when she
spoke of another. commercial entity she meant one that would include the public library and senior
center. She added that she felt regarding the Ehlers' memo, there had been a disconnection
between what Commissioner Faust has been saying and what . Ehlers reported. Ehlers, in her
opinion, has not given any details; just an overview of what could be done if the City were to give
Page 2
Minutes /Edina HRA /March 15, 1999
WMEP everything it asked for and support WMEP financially with unlimited funds. Commissioner
Faust said that in order for the HRA to evaluate the WMEP proposal financially, certain facts must be
forthcoming, such as: what TIF funds would be gained if a commercial developer were chosen
instead of the school; what taxes would be gained for ten years after 2010 if a commercial
development were selected; with all the financial details spelled out, who would be paying for the
demolition of the current buildings; who would pay for the environmental studies; and who would pay
for the bus garage site clean -up and other demolition sites clean up. Commissioner Faust said that
the Ehlers' memo suggested reselling properties the HRA purchases at a lower price than the HRA
paid. In the combined WMEP /Jerry's proposal, it was suggested that the HRA purchase the school
bus garage for $1,020,000 and then sell it for $550,000. Commissioner Faust expressed her concern
and frustration with this suggestion.. Commissioner Faust asked who would pay and how much
would be paid for the other properties needed to make the WMEP proposal happen. She also asked
what would happen if current tax increment financing laws were changed. Commissioner Faust
asked what impact using the TIF funds on the WMEP project would have on the development and
repair of the other commercial areas in the Grandview area. She expressed concern that Grandview
would have difficulty repairing their parking areas or maintaining what is in place. Commissioner
Faust asked if the TIF funds proposed to be used for the WMEP project are joint funds from the 50''
& France and Grandview areas or from Grandview alone. Commissioner Faust stated her belief that
the WMEP proposal will be a significant expense to the City versus what the City could get with
commercial real estate. She said if the City plans to move forward with a proposal costing so much,
perhaps there should be a referendum.
Commissioner Hovland stated that Commissioner Faust's issues were well raised, however; he
assumed that the details she asked for would be provided as the proposal moves along. He
submitted that he believed the HRA could make a well- reasoned, informed decision later after
receiving the "devil and the detail" about the WMEP proposal.
Chair Smith observed' that the Edina HRA has been through this type of development twice before
with 50`h & France, and .also the Edinborough and Centennial Lakes developments. He noted that
Executive Director Hughes had been with the City through all of these developments and asked the
Executive Director to explain the process the HRA should follow.
Executive Director Hughes responded that he believed many of Commissioner Faust's questions
could be answered at this time, but some further development details would be needed to answer
others. He stated that looking back at the Edinborough and Centennial Lake projects, what was
initially needed was some type of letter of intent that gave the HRA and the particular developers the
ability to proceed in evaluating- the proposed development, coming up with the redevelopment
contract, and details of the proposal. Executive Director Hughes stated that he believes this is the
next step the HRA should take if they decide that developing a Letter of Intent is the direction the City
should take for the site. This would authorize staff to narrow down development agreements with the
parties involved in the proposal, which includes WMEP, Edina Schools, Edina HRA, City of Edina,
and Jerry's.
Chair Smith asked if Executive Director Hughes meant that the letter of intent would show the plan's
details that Commissioner Faust requested, and that Commissioner Hovland wanted to evaluate
before giving a final authorization for the project. Executive Director Hughes replied that the letter of
intent would provide further details. Also there would still be a redevelopment agreement, a
conditional use permit and a rezoning all requiring consideration and approval.
Chair Smith asked if any of Commissioner Faust's questions could be answered. Executive Director
replied that staff had attempted reviewing the implications if all the subject properties were tax
exempt as opposed to taxable. The analysis is very difficult because of fiscal disparities and
commercial /industrial properties' tax base sharing. However, if it is assumed that the property is all
exempt as compared with developments generating up to $1,000,000 annually in taxes, this
preliminary analysis would equate to approximately % of one per cent on the tax bill for an average
Edina home. Executive Director Hughes stated some earlier proposals had suggested they could
Page 3
Minutes /Edina HRA/March 15, 1999
generate 1.7 million in taxes; however, that would be more than the 50" & France area. Thus, staff
believes one million is a more accurate number. Chair Smith asked Executive Director Hughes to
convert his estimate into dollars for a $200,000 house. Executive Director Hughes replied it would
be approximately $10:00 per year.
Commissioner Faust interjected that since this was a tax increment district; all taxes would be
captured until 2010. Chair Smith replied that the dollars must be made up to the School District, the
City and the County, and that ' is where taxes are impacted. Commissioner Faust stated that the
impact would be spread throughout the entire Hennepin County. She asked if the City received one
million in taxes .off the land, then wouldn't the TIF district recapture those dollars until 2010.
Executive Director Hughes agreed that the TIF district would capture the entire amount; however,
under TIF law, the dollars may only be spent on projects eligible for the use of tax increment funds
within the Grandview TIF District. If the dollars are not spent for.eligible. uses, then the dollars are
redistributed to the taxing jurisdictions in the same percentages as they were originally collected.
Commissioner Faust observed that the HRA could capture ten million dollars until 2010, and then.
since the TIF districts are shared, then 501h & France could use the money. Executive Director
Hughes clarified that since the Grandview TIF District stands alone; the increment could only be
used to finance eligible public improvements within the Grandview TIF District. He continued stating
his concern that most improvements have already been done, and apart from the Kunz Oil /Lewis
Engineering site all the property is currently developed.
Commissioner Faust stated she believed that Eden Avenue could be widened and the bridge redone
using the TIF funds, making the area better able to handle commercial development. Executive
Director Hughes agreed; however, he believed that the road project would not utilize the entire
increment. Commissioner Faust stated that her belief that projects could be found to use the
increment - -for example, the parking ramp needs -to be refinished.
Chair Smith asked the Executive Director to explain how the Grandview area amenities are
maintained. Executive Director Hughes explained that the amenities are maintained using. an
agreement which assesses the maintenance cost to the .benefited property owners. Further, he
added that maintenance activities are not eligible as TIF improvements. Attorney Gilligan added that
normal annual upkeep expenses are not TIF eligible. TIF improvements must be capital
improvements, not painting or maintenance. Chair Smith.said the improvements such as the stone
columns, road improvement, parking ramps, and landscaping improvements were all capital
expenditures and therefore TIF eligible. However, the maintenance of the landscaping, parking lot
maintenance, etc. must be financed through assessments.
Commissioner Faust asked if a developer wanted to come in and develop the site, could TIF funds
be used to widen the road or improve the bridge. Executive Director Hughes explained that public
improvements could be financed from TIF dollars and that the cost of the land could be written down
through the use of TIF dollars, but TIF dollars may not be used to build a private building. He
continued by stating that the Grandview area improvements were what the business community
wanted, but there is not another project at this time that he could recommend.
Commissioner Faust requested the staff have Ehlers calculate what TIF funds could be captured
based upon the four finalists who submitted proposals to the City, as opposed to nothing if the
WMEP school were developed.
Commissioner Maetzold stated that he had two comments. First -- regarding the bus garage - -it has
been the desire of the City for. several years to do something with the site. The problem exists
because the School District needs buses. Commissioner Maetzold added he was serving on the
School Board ten years ago when the City was attempting to resolve the bus issue. The buses must
go someplace; and in his opinion, there is no land in Edina except the site. south of Eden Avenue that
Page 4
Minutes /Edina HRA /March 15, 1999
can house the buses. If the City does not find a location to house the buses, the School District
would have no desire to give up the current bus garage. He added that he was certain the District
was not going to get rid of the buses and contract with private vendors for bus services.
Secondly, Commissioner Maetzold spoke. regarding an alternative revenue source -in developing a
portion of the site south of Eden Avenue exclusive of the Senior Center and library. Commissioner
Maetzold believes there is one decision relative to two points: 1) either develop the site for public or
commercial purpose focusing on revenue; or 2) move ahead to a development agreement with
WMEP and the other parties involved, with alternative revenue sources being a footnote in that
discussion. Commissioner Maetzold stated his belief that a development agreement answering the
questions Commissioner Faust raised should be prepared, then a determination should be made if
the project is viable. An opportunity exists that should be investigated to determine the best use of
the site.
Chair Smith stated that if the HRA was sending staff off gathering data in response to questions, then
it should make sure the product returned was based on reality and not some developer's ideal or
wish. When the City entertained requests for proposals for the Kunz Oil /Lewis Engineering site, they
did not stipulate leaving land for Hennepin County Library or a senior center when proposing a
development. Chair Smith stated that he understood from meetings thus far that the WMEP proposal
had a footprint of approximately 35,000 square feet, had a two -story building of 70,000 square feet
and with the gyms came close to 90,000 square feet. So far he had not seen anything that, would
deter him from voting yes to a proposal that would include all the aforementioned items. He added,
that including all the components would most likely necessitate additional land be included in the
development. In Chair Smith's opinion, the HRA must let the staff know if they should pursue the
direction of the public proposal or focus on a private development. Chair Smith suggested that staff
be directed to move forward in development of a Letter of Intent to be signed by all the parties, noting
there are many steps that need to be addressed where the HRA/Council still has oversight and could
look at all the details before deciding yes or no.
Commissioner Faust stated that she believes all HRA members have a fiduciary responsibility to
Edina's citizens and in her opinion, moving ahead and signing any letter of intent is premature. She
stated that Commissioners Hovland and Maetzold had not yet seen any plans. Many questions must
be answered and more details must be known before a Letter of Intent can be designed.
Chair Smith reiterated that the purpose of a Letter of Intent is to answer questions and get the details
needed to make the necessary decisions. A Letter of Intent tells the developer that some
cohesiveness exists, so they can spend money formulating a detailed proposal. A Letter of Intent is
non binding;, it just says that these parties want to do something if feasible. In order to get definitive
plans, a Letter of Intent is needed.
Commissioner Faust stated that she believes it would be irresponsible to move forward without more
detail.
Commissioner Maetzold stated he was prepared to go ahead and move that the HRA create a Letter
of Intent. He said that no one is going to argue about fiduciary responsibility to the community;
however, the HRA also has a responsibility to ensure that the needs of the community are met. A
Letter of Intent is not binding, but is the first step in a journey to meet the needs of the Edina
community in respect to the subject property. In addition to the parties previously mentioned, the
State Senate is involved. Senators Terwilliger and Pogemiller are sponsoring a funding bill, so there
is another party involved in the project. A Letter of Intent is the way to become focused on costs and
environmental issues that need to be reviewed and addressed in making a final decision.
Commissioner Hovland stated his belief that all HRA members want to make well- reasoned
decisions. He observed that a Letter of Intent is a preliminary conceptual preference without
prejudging the outcome of anything. He noted that the HRA has been wrestling with the subject
property's development for approximately two years. They have asked staff to provide quantities of
Page 5
Minutes /Edina HRA/March 15, 1999
information, and it gets to be awfully amorphous looking at private development versus public
development. However, over time, he believes that certain things have become evident that the HRA
wants in response to community needs. These wants include: a senior center, a new library (giving
the City the opportunity to put in a new Police station and modestly improve City Hall using dollars
already set aside for this purpose), and a magnet school (giving the ability to add needed
gymnasiums and a performance theater). As a new Council Member, Commissioner Hovland had
some of the same concerns that Commissioner Faust has expressed; however, he believes that he
understands more now conceptually, and thinks that perhaps a public purpose is a good idea. He
added that when WMEP initially came before the City, the HRA/Council endorsed the concept, but
said go find a better site. Now, WMEP is back telling the HRA that they cannot find another site and
they are asking the HRA to look at the Kunz Oil /Lewis Engineering site again. Commissioner
Hovland believes that the HRA should conceptually agree to look at the proposal. He advocated
giving staff the direction they need at least on a preliminary basis without pre - judging the final
outcome. If a Letter of Intent is the appropriate procedural vehicle to use, then he urged the HRA to
do it.
Commissioner Faust stated she finds it hard to believe that the other members could vote on the
concept without seeing the plans.
Chair Smith restated the direction would be to have staff draft a Letter of Intent, circulate it among the
interested parties and bring it back to the HRA. He added that the residents need to be queried,
noting that there . will be a public hearing before any development agreement takes place. Chair
Smith observed that WMEP was finally holding a community meeting. However, he concluded that
the City will exercise due diligence before approving anything other than the concept as outlined by a
Letter of Intent. Chair Smith confirmed that WMEP will appear on April 5, 1999, as previously
planned. Executive Director Hughes clarified that the Letter of Intent should be drafted, circulated
and brought back before the HRA on April 5, 1999.
Commissioner . Maetzold made a motion directing staff to draft of Intent outlining the
Conceptual Redevelopment of the Kunz Lewis site, and bring it back to the HRA at the regular
meeting of April 5, 1999. Commissioner Hovland seconded the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Hovland, Maetzold, .Smith
Nay: Faust .
Motion carried.
CLAIMS PAID Commissioner Maetzold made a motion to approve payment of the HRA Claims
as shown in detail on the Check Register dated March 10, 1999, and consisting 'of one page
totaling $27,990.60. Commissioner Faust seconded the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Maetzold, Smith
Motion carried.
There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, Chair Smith declared the meeting adjourned at
8:30 p.m.
Executive Director
Page 6
°I Icn REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: HRA
From: Gordon Hughes
City Manager
Date: April 5, 1999
Subject: WMEP Proposal
Recommendation:
Agenda Item #
Consent
Information Only
Mgr. Recommends
HRA II.
® To HRA
❑ To Council
Action ® Motion
❑ Resolution
❑ Ordinance
® Discussion
1. Approve attached Letter of Intent and authorize circulation to project participants.
2. Authorize preparation of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet for the project.
3. Authorize HRA staff and attorneys to begin redevelopment contract negotiations
with project participants.
4. Direct staff to prepare necessary amendments to the Grandview Redevelopment
Plan.
5. Authorize staff to begin negotiations with owners of additional properties needed for
the project.
6. Consent to the filing of a petition for rezoning and an application for conditional use
permit by project participants.
Info /Background:
On January 4, 1999, the HRA adopted a motion allowing the West Metro Education
Program (WMEP) 60 to 90 days to submit detailed plans and proposals with respect to
the Lewis Engineering /Kunz Oil properties. The HRA directed that the cost of such
plans and proposals be borne by WMEP and authorized the HRA to retain the services
of a financial consultant to assist in the evaluation of TIF related issues. (HRA staff
subsequently retained Ehlers & Associates for this purpose.) WMEP retained the
Beard Group to serve as a development consultant on their behalf.
WMEP has now prepared a detailed plan and proposal which they will present at the
April 5, 1999, HRA meeting. Enclosed for your review prior to the meeting are the
following items which have been prepared at WMEP's expense: 1) a booklet describing
the project, 2) a public opinion survey concerning the magnet school, 3) a plan and 4) a
Report/Recommendation
April 5, 1999
Page two
preliminary traffic analysis for the project. Also attached is a memorandum from Rusty
Fifield of Ehlers '& Associates which analyzes TIF issues with respect to the
development. Mr. Fifield has also prepared a second memo which analyzes the tax
exempt nature of this project and quantifies its effect on the overall Edina tax base. Mr.
Fifield will attend the April 5th meeting to answer questions about his analysis.
On March 15, 1999, the HRA further directed that staff prepare a draft Letter of Intent
for consideration at the April 5th meeting. This draft is attached for your review. Copies
have been sent to other project participants for their review and comment.
If the HRA wishes to proceed with consideration of this proposal, staff recommends the
actions outlined above.
I
EHLERS
& ASSOCIATES INC
O
To: Edina HRA
From: Rusty Fifield
W
Subject: WMEP Project
Date: April 2, 1999
Part of the April 5" presentation to the HRA on the WMEP project involves financing of HRA's
participation in the project. My March 12' memorandum provided a brief description of the
preliminary plan to finance the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority's (HRA)
participation in this project. This memo continues the planning process by providing the results
of the financial analysis of the WMEP project.
HRA Actions
The WMEP proposal requires the HRA to take certain actions. The expense and revenues from
these actions form the framework for the financial analysis. The primary HRA actions
considered in the financial analysis are:
1. Acquire the Kunz/Lewis property (action complete).
2. Acquire other property required to complete development plan - TAGS, 5244 Eden
Circle, existing school bus garage.
3. Sell portion of acquired property to WMEP for the school and related facilities.
4. Sell portion of acquired property to School District for new bus garage.
5. Retain portion of acquired property as site for senior center and library.
6. Repay internal borrowing used to initially acquire Kunz/Lewis.
7. Sell existing school bus garage property for private redevelopment.
8. Purchase existing library adjacent to City Hall.
The table on the next page combines the estimated sources and uses of funds for these purposes.
These figures form the foundation for the preliminary financial analysis of the project.
L E A D E R S IN P U B L I C F I N A N C E
3060 Centre Pointe Drive
Roseville, MN 55113 -1105
651.697.8506 fax 651.697.8555
rusty @eh lers -i nc.com
WMEP Project
April 2, 1999
Page 2
SOURCES
WMEP Payment $3,000,000
School Payment (New Garage) 280,000
City Payment (Existing Library) 1,000,000
Developer Payment (Existing Garage) 700,000
Bonds 7,140,000
TOTAL SOURCES $12,120,000
Financial Projections
USES
Kunz/Lewis
TAGS
5244 Eden Circle
Existing Garage
Library Construction
Senior Center Construction
Improvement/Contingency
Finance
TOTAL USES
$2,845,000
1,550,000
730,000
1,020,000
2,800,000
1,800,000
1,200,000
175,000
$12,120,000
Cash flow projections have been made to evaluate the financial feasibility of undertaking the
HRA actions described in this memo. In addition to the project assumptions previously
described, the projections rely on the following assumptions:
► All tax increment from the Grandview TIF District (after meeting existing debt
obligations) will be available for this project. The HRA can capture tax increment in this
district through taxes payable 2010.
► The local tax rate will not decrease over the life of the district.
► The statutory formulas for calculating tax capacity on commercial /industrial property will
not change.
► The redevelopment of the bus garage site (and adjoining parcels) results in 92,000 square
feet of development with an estimated market value of $8,280,000. For property tax
purposes, the redevelopment project will be 50% complete in 2000 and fully complete by
the end of 2001.
No additional value from other development (except the redevelopment of the bus garage
site) or inflation is used to calculate tax increment revenues.
► The projections do not account for revenue earned from the investment of cash fund
balances.
The complete cash flow projections are attached to this memo.
WMEP Project
April 2, 1999
Page 3
Preliminary Findings and Conclusions
Based on our initial analysis of the proposed WMEP project and the potential for the
redevelopment of the bus garage site, we offer the following findings and conclusions:
1. Private redevelopment is needed. The existing tax increment revenue from the
Grandview District is not sufficient to support all proposed HRA actions without
additional taxable development within the District. The redevelopment of the bus garage
site and adjoining parcels provides the necessary taxable development.
2. HRA participation is feasible. The HRA has the financial resources to undertake this
project if adjacent properties are developed with taxable uses. The financial projections
show a strong reserve balance over the life of the TIF District. This balance creates
capacity to deal with changes in project costs and in the property tax system.
3. Some additional costs can be supported. The number of gym spaces is a discussion point
in the scope of the project. From a financial perspective, it would be difficult to support
the full cost of one additional gym ($1,100,000) under the assumptions used in this
analysis. The amount of additional costs that could be added to the project are function of
all other parameter used in the analysis and the minimum fund balance acceptable to the
HRA.
4. Timing is important. The HRA can only capture tax increments in this TIF district
through 2010. Delays in the project reduce the revenues available to the HRA.
5. The City would need to finance the purchase of the existing library from sources other
than TIR
N AM innsuta\EDINA \ccsum45. wpd
PRELIMINARY - For Discussion Only
City of Edina
WMEP Redevelopment Project
Cash Flow Projections
REVENUES
EXPENDITURES
ESTIMATED
Tax
Bond
Sale of
TOTAL
Existing
New
Acquisition &
Project
Other
TOTAL
RESERVE
Month
Year
Increment
Proceeds
Rent
Property
REVENUES
Debt
Debt
Demolition
Costs
Expenses
EXPENDITURES
BALANCE
1
1999
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,758,049
2
1999
22,837
0
0
0
22,837
228,800
0
0
0
0
228,800
1,552,086
3
1999
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,552,086
4
1999
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,552,086
5
1999
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,552,086
6
1999
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3,300,000
0
0
3,300,000
(1,747,914)
7
1999
341,661
6,965,000
0
3,280,000
10,586,661
0
0
0
0
0
0
8,838,747
8
1999
0
0
0
700,000
700,000
75,500
0
0
0
0
75,500
9,463,247
9
1999
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,800,000
0
1,800,000
7,663,247
10
1999
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7,663,247
11
1999
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2,800,000
0
2,800,000
4,863,247
12
1999
334,543
0
0
0
334,543
0
0
0
0
75,000
75,000
5,122,790
1
2000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5,122,790
2
2000
21,354
0
0
0
21,354
275,500
181,918
0
0
0
457,418
4,686,726
3
2000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4,686,726
4
2000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4,686,726
5
2000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,200,000
0
1,200,000
3.486,726
6
2000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3,486,726
7
2000
355,378
0
0
0
355,378
0
0
0
0
0
0
3,842,104
8
2000
0
0
0
0
0
70,900
155,930
0
0
0
226,830
3,615,274
9
2000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3,615,274
10
2000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3,615,274
11
2000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3,615,274
12
2000
347,974
0
0
1,000,000
1,347,974
0
0
0
0
75,000
75,000
4,888,248
1
2001
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4,888,248
2
2001
22,211
0
0
0
22,211
2,770,900
155,930
0
0
0
2,926,830
1,983,629
3
2001
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,983,629
4
2001
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,983,629
5
2001
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,983,629
6
2001
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,983,629
7
2001
355,378
0
0
0
355,378
0
0
0
0
0
0
2,339,008
8
2001
0
0
0
0
0
9,900
155,930
0
0
0
165,830
2,173,178
9
2001
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2,173,178
10
2001
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2,173,178
11
2001
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2,173,178
12
2001
347,974
0
0
0
347,974
0
0
0
0
75,000
75,000
2,446,152
1
2002
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2,446,152
2
2002
22,211
0
0
0
22,211
209,900
155,930
0
0
0
365,830
2,102,533
3
2002
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2,102,533
4
2002
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2,102,533
5
2002
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2,102,533
6
2002
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2,102,533
7
2002
427,538
0
0
0
427,538
0
0
0
0
0
0
2,530,071
8
2002
0
0
0
0
0
5,000
155,930
0
0
0
160,930
2,369,141
9
2002
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2,369,141
10
2002
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2,369,141
11
2002
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2,369,141
12
2002
418,631
0
0
0
418,631
- 0
0
0
0
75,000
75,000
2,712,771
1
2003
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2,712,771
2
2003
26,721
0
0
0
26,721
705,000
915,930
0
0
0
1,120,930
1,618,562
3
2003
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,618,562
4
2003
0
0
0
0
0
- 0
0
0
0
0
0
1,618,562
5
2003
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,618,562
6
2003
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,618,562
7
2003
499,697
0
0
0
499,697
0
0
0
0
0
0
2,118,259
Ehlers & Associates,
Inc.
04/02/99
Edina \G_ view\CityTIF.123
PRELIMINARY - For Discussion Only
City of Edina
WMEP Redevelopment Project
Cash Flow Projections
REVENUES
Ehlers & Associates, Inc. 04/02/99 Edina \G_view \CityTIF.123
ESTIMATED
Tax
Bond
Sale of
TOTAL
Existing
New
Acquisition &
Project
Other
TOTAL
RESERVE
Month
Year
Increment
Proceeds
Rent
Property
REVENUES
Debt
Debt
Demolition
Costs
Expenses
EXPENDITURES
BALANCE
0
140,920
0
0
0
140,920
1,977,339
8 2003 0 0 0 0 0
9
2003
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,977,339
10
2003
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,977,339
11
2003
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,977,339
12
2003
489,287
0
0
0
489,287
0
0
0
0
75,000
75,000
2,391,626
1
2004
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2,391,626
2
2004
31,231
0
0
0
31,231
0
935,920
0
0
0
935,920
1,486,937
3
2004
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,486,937
4
2004
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,486,937
5
2004
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,486,937
6
2004
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,486,937
7
2004
499,697
0
0
0
499,697
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,986,634
8
2004
0
0
0
0
0
0
124,623
0
0
0
124,623
1,862,011
9
2004
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,862,011
10
2004
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,862,011
11
2004
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,862,011
12
2004
489,287
0
0
0
489,287
0
0
0
0
75,000
75.000
2,276,298
1
2005
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2,276,298
2
2005
31,231
0
0
0
31,231
0
954,623
0
0
0
954,623
1,352,906
3
2005
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,352,906
4
2005
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,352.906
5
2005
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,352,906
6
2005
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,352,906
7
2005
499,697
0
0
0
499,697
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,852,603
8
2005
0
0
0
0
0
0
107,193
0
0
0
107,193
1,745,411
9
2005
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,745,411
10
2005
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,745,411
11
2005
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,745,411
12
2005
489,287
0
0
0
489,287
0
0
0
0
75,000
75,000
2,159,697
1
2006
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2,159,697
2
2006
31,231
0
0
0
31,231
0
977,193
0
0
0
977,193
1,213,736
3
2006
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,213,736
4
2006
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,213,736
5
2006
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,213,736
6
2006
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,213,736
7
2006
499,697
0
0
0
499,697
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,713,433
8
2006
0
0
0
0
0
0
88,488
0
0
0
88,488
1,624,945
9
2006
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,624,945
10
2006
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,624,945
11
2006
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,624,945
12
2006
489,287
0
0
0
489,287
0
0
0
0
75,000
75,000
2,039,232
1
2007
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2,039,232
2
2007
31,231
0
0
0
31,231
0
998,488
0
0
0
998,488
1,071,976
3
2007
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,071,976
4
2007
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,071,976
5
2007
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,071,976
6
2007
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,071,976
7
2007
499,697
0
0
0
499,697
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,571,672
8
2007
0
0
0
0
0
0
68,468
0
0
0
68,468
1,503,205
Ehlers & Associates, Inc. 04/02/99 Edina \G_view \CityTIF.123
PRELIMINARY - For Discussion Only
City of Edina
WMEP Redevelopment Project
Cash Flow Projections
TOTALS
Ehlers & Associates, Inc. 04/02/99 Edina \G_view \CityTIF.123
REVENUES
EXPENDTURES
ESTIMATED
Tax
Bond
Sale of
TOTAL
Existing
New
Acquisition & Project
Other
TOTAL
RESERVE
Month
Year
Increment
Proceeds
Rent
Property
REVENUES
Debt
Debt
Demolition Costs
Expenses
EXPENDITURES
BALANCE
9
2007
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,503,205
10
2007
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,503,205
11
2007
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,503,205
12
2007
489,287
0
0
0
489,287
0
0
0
0
75,000
75,000
1,917,491
1
2008
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,917,491
2
2008
31,231
0
0
0
31,231
0
1,018,468
0
0
0
1,018,468
930,255
3
2008
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
930,255
4
2008
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
930,255
5
2008
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
930,255
6
2008
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
930,255
7
2008
499,697
0
0
0
499,697
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,429,952
8
2008
0
0
0
0
0
0
47,093
0
0
0
47,093
1,382,859
9
2008
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,382,859
10
2008
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,382,859
11
2008
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,382,859
12
2008
489,287
0
0
0
489,287
0
0
0
0
75,000
75,000
1,797,146
1
2009
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,797,146
2
2009
31,231
0
0
0
31,231
0
1,037,093
0
0
0
1,037,093
791,285
3
2009
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
791,285
4
2009
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
791,285
5
2009
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
791,285
6
2009
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
791,285
7
2009
499,697
0
0
0
499,697
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,290,981
8
2009
0
0
0
0
0
0
24,323
0
0
0
24,323
1,266,659
9
2009
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,266,659
10
2009
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,266,659
11
2009
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,266,659
12
2009
489,287
0
0
0
489,287
0
0
0
0
75,000
75.000
1,680,946
1
2010
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,680,946
2
2010
31,231
0
0
0
31,231
0
1,059,323
0
0
0
1,059,323
652,854
3
2010
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
652,854
4
2010
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
652,854
5
2010
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
652,854
6
2010
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
652,854
7
2010
499,697
0
0
0
499,697
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,152,551
8
2010
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,152,551
9
2010
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,152,551
10
2010
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,152,551
11
2010
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,152,551
12
2010
489,287
0
0
0
489,2871
0
0
0
0
75,000
75,000
1,566,838
TOTALS
Ehlers & Associates, Inc. 04/02/99 Edina \G_view \CityTIF.123
To: City of Edina
O
0 From: Rusty Fifield
Subject: Property Tax Implications
W Tax - Exempt Development of Kunz/Lewis
2 Date: April 2, 1999
EHLERS
& ASSOCIATES INC
There are many factors to consider in the evaluation of a development project. A unique factor
presented by the WMEP proposal is in the tax- exempt nature of the development. The WMEP
project would not directly produce new taxable property value. This memo presents a basic
analysis of the potential property tax impacts from alternative levels of private development on
the Kunz/Lewis site.
Property Tax Parameters
Data for taxes payable in 1999 serve as the starting point for this analysis. The analysis shows
the potential changes under the conditions that exist in 1999. The property tax analysis builds on
three basic elements:
• The Levy represents the money that the taxing jurisdiction seeks to raise from property
taxes.
• The Net Tax Capacity equals the value of property in the jurisdiction for the purposes of
determining property taxes.
• The Extension Rate is the tax rate that must be applied to the Net Tax Capacity to
produce the desired levy amount.
Table 1 below contains these elements for the City of Edina, the Edina School District and
Hennepin County.
Table 1
City Pay 99 Extension Rate
17.810%
School Pay 99 Extension Rate
50.788%
County Pay 99 Extension Rate
40.994%
Net Extension Rate
109.592%
City Calculated Levy
12,862,638
School Calculated Levy
29,768,926
County Calculated Levy
379,125,051
Net Fiscal Disparities Distribution
29.28%
LEADERS IN PUBLIC FINANCE
3060 Centre Pointe Drive 651.697.8506 fax 651.697.8555
Roseville, MN 55113 -1105 rustygehlers- inc.com
Property Tax Implications
April 2, 1999
Page 2
The Fiscal Disparities Program plays a role in analyzing the financial implications of commercial
development. Forty percent of the taxable value from all new commercial - industrial
development is contributed to the Program. In turn, the City receives a distribution from the
Program. For Edina, the value of the contribution exceeds the distribution. The end result is that
approximately 29% of total tax capacity actually produces tax revenues for local jurisdictions.
Development Scenarios
City Staff suggested three development scenarios for the purpose of this analysis. These
scenarios are based on previous efforts to attract private development to this site. The estimated
market value produced from the three scenarios are:
Project A
$9,170,000
Project B
$17,640,000
Project C
$26,115,000
Table 2 contains the projected taxable property value from in each scenario using under the
current property tax system. The estimated Tax Capacity resulting from the projects assumes that
all development is taxed as commercial - industrial property. The Adjusted Tax Capacity value
serves the basis for calculating the property tax implications.
Table 2
Implications
All other things being equal, growth in property values leads to lower property taxes. The new
development adds to the overall taxable valuation of the community. With a larger tax base, a
lower tax extension rate is needed to produce the same tax levy revenues.
Table 3 contains the estimated property tax implications from the development scenarios. This
analysis relies on the following assumptions:
Project A
Project B
Project C
Estimated Market Value of New Development
9,170,000
17,640,000
26,115,000
Tax Capacity
319,375
615,825
912,450
Estimated Tax Dollars Generated
350,009
674,895
999,972
Adjusted Tax Capacity after FD Adjustment
93,508
180,303
267,150
Implications
All other things being equal, growth in property values leads to lower property taxes. The new
development adds to the overall taxable valuation of the community. With a larger tax base, a
lower tax extension rate is needed to produce the same tax levy revenues.
Table 3 contains the estimated property tax implications from the development scenarios. This
analysis relies on the following assumptions:
Property Tax Implications
April 2, 1999
Page 3
• The projections are based on adjustments for taxes payable 1999.
• No increase in the tax levy for each jurisdiction.
• School District tax rate allowed to fall. In reality, the reduction in the School tax
extension rate would be less than shown in this analysis. For the general operating levy,
growth in the tax base does not reduce the tax rate, but rather reduces the amount of state
aid paid to the District.
Table 3
EMV Tax Capacity
Project A
Project B
Project C
184,000 2,603
2,852.68
2,852.68
2,852.68
Current
2,849.87
2,847.26
2,844.67
Adjusted
(2.81)
(5.42)
(8.01)
Change
- 0.10%
-0.19%
-0.28%
% Change
250,000 3,725
4,082.30
4,082.30
4,082.30
Current
4,078.28
4,074.55
4,070.83
Adjusted
(4.03)
(7.75)
(11.47)
Change
- 0.10%
-0019%
-0.28%
% Change
500,000 7,975
8,739.96
8,739.96
8,739096
Current
8,731.34
8,723.37
8,715.41
Adjusted
(8.62)
(16.60)
(24.56)
Change
- 0.10%
-0.19%
-0.28%
% Change
The changes in property taxes are shown for three levels of residential homestead property. The
changes are shown as both dollars of tax payment and percentage change.
It is important to remember that the actual property tax consequences of private development of
the Kunz/Lewis site are more than ten years into the future. The taxable value of this property
will likely be captured by the Grandview TIF District. The District is scheduled to terminate in
2010.
NAMinnsota\EDINA \tax —cx. wpd
[HRA LETTERHEAD]
11999
[NAME]
[Address]
Re: Letter of Intent For Eden Avenue Redevelopment in Edina
Dear
The purpose of this correspondence is to set forth certain non - binding understandings
between the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority ( "HRA") and
(" ") with respect to 's participation in the Eden Avenue Redevelopment project (the
"Project "). The following paragraphs reflect our understanding of the matters described in them,
but do not constitute a complete statement of, or a legally binding or enforceable agreement or
commitment of either the HRA or with respect to, the matter described therein:
1. The Project will consist of five connected buildings, a separate bus garage and
several parking areas designed to serve the Project, and the redevelopment of the
bus garage site of Independent School District No. 273 (the "District ") on the
north side of Eden Avenue along with the existing car wash located adjacent
thereto. The Project will integrate and enlarge Sherwood Park, located southwest
of the development, to serve both the Project and the Edina corrununity. A
depiction of the Project is attached to this correspondence as Attachment A.
2. The first building in the portion of the Project located south of Eden Avenue, will
house the Edina Library. The HRA will construct the new Edina Library in
accordance with drawings and specifications mutually agreed upon by the HRA
and the Hennepin County Library Board (the "Library"), and exchange it for the
current Edina Library property located at 4701 West 50th Street.
3. The second building, to be located immediately south of the new library, will
provide a new home to the Edina Senior Center (the "Senior Center "). The new
Senior Center will be constructed by the HRA as required by the City of Edina
(the "City ").
4. The third, fourth and fifth buildings, each to be located in succession south of the
new Senior Center, will be owned and constructed by and at the expense of the
.1i
, 1999
Page _
West Metro Education Program ( "WMEM and will, respectively, consist of a
performing arts theater, a main elementary school building and a recreational
building housing at least two full size gymnasiums. Additional gymnasiums) )
may be constructed if agreed to by the HRA and the District. The performing arts
theater and gymnasiums shall be available for use by the City for community
activities when not being used for school activities. Prior to construction, WMEP
will purchase from the HRA the land upon which its buildings will be located for
a purchase price of $3,000,000.00.
5. The bus garage to be constructed as part of the Project will he Iocated east of the
proposed library building on property to be acquired by the District and will be
constructed by and at the expense of the District in accordance with drawings and
specifications mutually agreed upon by the HRA and the District. A parking lot
will be constructed on top of the bus garage. The District will convey to the HRA
the District's current bus garage property.
6. The City will retain ownership of the existing Sherwood Park and the HRA will
convey to the City the additional land for the enlargement of Sherwood Park.
7. Various site related improvements such as parking, drainage, utilities and
landscaping will be constructed as part of the Project and the costs of construction
of such improvernenis located south of Eden Avenue will be shared by the HRA,
WMEP and the District. With respect to the portion of the Project located south.
of Eden Avenue, the City,.the HRA, the Library, WMEP and the District will each
enter into a reciprocal operating and easement agreement to provide the necessary
easements and party wall agreements to permit construction of the Project and to
coordinate and facilitate vehicular and pedestrian ingress and egress to the Project
and the joint use, maintenance and repair of all Project common areas, utilities
and parking lots.
8. Jerry's Operating Co., or another developer approved by the HRA in its sole
discretion (the "Private Developer"), will purchase from the HRA the District's
existing bus garage and redevelop the bus garage site along with the property
adjacent thereto. Such private redevelopment will include approximately 19,000
square feet of retail space and up to 72.000 square feet of office space, together
with surface and under building parking for approximately 400 cars.
Development of the Project, including participation in the Project by the HRA and
is contingent upon the occurrence of the following events:
'1999
Page _
A. In the judgment of the HRA the tax increment revenue from the Grandview Area
Tax Increment Financing District will be sufficient to pay the costs of the Project
to be paid by the HRA and there has been no adverse changes in Minnesota law
which prohibits the HRA from using tax increment revenue from the Grandview
Area Tax Increment Financing District to pay the HRA costs of the Project;
B. The HRA must acquire by direct purchase or condemnation for a total cost and on
such terms and conditions acceptable to the HRA as determined in the HRA's sole
and absolute discretion, the properties having addresses of 5244 Eden Circle and
5201 Eden Circle (collectively, the "Eden Circle Land ");
C. The HRA must obtain an environmental assessment worksheet and all other
environmental reports and surveys deemed necessary in the HRA's sole discretion
for all of the Project property (including the Eden Circle Land), the current Edina
Library site at 4701 West 50th Street, the current District bus garage site at 5150
Eden Avenue, and the car wash site adjacent to the current bus garage at 5201
Vemon Avenue, each of which worksheets, reports and surveys must be
satisfactory to the HRA in its sole discretion;
D. WMEP must obtain from the Minnesota State Legislature at its 1999 Session all
necessary funding approvals for construction of its portion of the Project;
E. The City, HRA, WMEP and the District must obtain all necessary approvals for
the Project from the Nine Mile Watershed District and the Minnehaha Creek
Watershed District;
F. The City must grant all re- zoning approvals and conditional use permits necessary
to allow the Project to move forward; and
G. The HRA must enter into definitive, binding agreements for the acquisition,
development, construction and operation of the Project as described above with
each of the City, the Library, WMEP, the District and the Private Developer.
This correspondence is not intended to create a binding agreement between the 1-IRA and
and no such agreement is or shall be created until a written contract for the acquisition
and development of a portion of the Project property is executed by and between the City and
If is prepared to participate in the Project in accordance with the general terms
outlined above (subject to the above- referenced contingencies), please so acknowledge by
executing the enclosed copy of this correspondence and returning it to me no later than the close
of business on , 1999. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to
contact me.
.1999
Page _
Sincerely,
Gordon Hughes, Executive Director
ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED TO:
Its
Dated: 1999
Attachment
M�
a
,.'
4
r -
'! All
Ile
Y
^
m.
WMEP RedeveloPment ProPosal
WMEP
REDEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL
Prepared for
City of Edina
March 23, 1999
Prepared By:
The Beard Group
10 11th Avenue South
Hopkins, MN 55343
On behalf of
West Metro Education Program
In association with
Setter Leach & Lindstrom
1100 Peavey Building
730 Second Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55402
WMEP REDEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL
THE BEARD GROUP • SETTER LEACH & LINDSTROM
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
PROJECT DATA SUMMARY
SITE
PROJECT PERSPECTIVES
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT TEAM
WMEP REDEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL
THE BEARD GROUP • SETTER LEACH & LINDSTROM
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section A
Section B
Section C
Section D
Section E
Pry
60
11
411
YJ
621
bw
tin
ti
[7---l",
IL
it]
Ell
EK
I
Eli
Ell
GO
Ell
Ell
Ell
LQ9
[15
131
171
i
1-117,19,
[11
119
IF1911
Ell
Ell
W
U:
Ell
Ell
Ell
F&I
Ell
Eli
Fz-
FRI
19h
IN
V
it!
S
G
Ell
it
"'E"J
KI
K�, lj
L7--j
K "I
t
hl
Ell
Ell
V11
Ell
1
Ell
Ell
[KII
Ell
Ell
Eli
Wj
Ell
IT!
A
192
its
9§1
Q
Kl
Q
of!
sa
ha
ill
Ell
K
A
A
A
A
WA
[11
EA
E�
77
Q
oil
hil
611
Q
W
SO
p"I
W
-1
21
its
1-1,
-------
1-7
tog
M
Um.
M
A
"!5
Of 1.1
oil
Ell
Ell
05
V
]i
V
Ell
A
1
on-,
oil]
Ev 1
Ell
112
[it
A
Ell
11
[59
[39
IS
A
I
3
10
Ell
F11
Ell
Ell
Ell
0
Ell
Pol
F11
Eli
Ell
Svn-:!
Eli
K 1
1-
IL-7,19,
1
715
1711,
Ell
k2s
[19
179
lks
PC]
EV-11
E�l
-I-
.
h it
AS
E
K
G
A:
�`8!
S
-0-
bit
oil
Q
W
its
Eli
E-�T-]
*-K
Ell
Fol
PC
1,
2
Ell
so?
W
W,
U
Q
12,
Q
to]
131,
Sh
off
113
,k,,
its
;09
10.1"
E29
E-
1
-1
C"71
L--]
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
WMEP REDEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL
EDEN AVENUE
Fdina, MN
PROJECT OVERVIEW
WMEP is proposing a joint redevelopment of the Lewis Engineering, Kunz
Oil, 5244 Eden Circle and 5201 Eden Circle (building which is occupied by
TAGS and Cross Technologies) sites along with an expansion and upgrade to
Sherwood Park. The WMEP proposal is a cooperative mixed -use public
development comprised of six interrelated components with individual owner-
ship by four units of government. They will share a common architectural
village theme. In addition to a shared theme and design elements the project
will provide for common shared parking areas, curb cuts, landscaping, mainte-
nance and repair. The buildings will be connected allowing for internal
circulation. An exterior breezeway that extends along the building's western
face will create exterior circulation and informal meeting areas. In addition to
The Edina community will also have
the common architectural theme and building connections the projects partici-
the benefit of using the WMEP g ins
pants are planning joint synergistic programming between the WMEP school,
and theater in off-houn.
county library and senior center.
PROJECT COMPONENTS The six interrelated components are: WMEP magnet elementary school for
grades K -5 for 500 -600 students with 2 full-size gyms and a performing arts
theater, an Edina senior center, Hennepin County Library, the Edina School
District's bus garage. In addition to the two full -size gyms provided by
WMEP, the project has been designed to accommodate a third and fourth full -
size gym that could be provided by the City of Edina
Pig � c•15
c•.RtiwM, s
i sy
1 NORTHSIDE
v
(O
WMEP SITE
r�
WMEP REDEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL
THE BEARD GROUP • SETTER LEACH & LINDSTROM Section
2
0 100
Redevelopment Project Participants
WMEP
96,600 square foot magnet K -5 elementary school with an
enrollment of 500 -600 students. The two -story elemen-
tary school has 36,500 sf per floor of classroom and
administrative space, two full -size gyms totaling 14,000 sf
and a 9,600 sf 300 -seat theater. In addition, WMEP
would make enhancements to the children's play areas in
Sherwood Park.
City of Edina
A new 15,000 square foot Senior Center will be placed
next to the library and performing arts center. Addition-
ally, one (possibly two) full -size gyms for community use
could be added to the two gyms already planned by
WMEP.
WMEP REDEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL
THE BEARD GROUP • SETTER LEACH & LINDSTROM
Hennepin County
A new 20,000 square foot Hennepin County Library will
be the flagship piece to the development positioned at the
entrance on Eden Avenue.
Edina Public Schools
Invisible to the rest of the development, the ESD Bus
Garage will be housed under the parking structure.
Parking for 56 buses will be provided as well as a 4,400 sf
administrative and maintenance area. There will not be
on -site fueling.
Section�
3
i
Old ESD Bus Garage Site
�'} 4
An indirectly related project would include the concurrent redevelopment of the Edina Public School's bus garage and
the adjacent car wash by Jerry's Enterprises, Inc. This project is referred to in the summary as the "Northside ". This
public - private component of the redevelopment project will have its own independent submission and review process.
The Jerry's development information is provided only for informational purposes.
Northside Project
ixQ
It is contemplated that the northside of Eden Avenue (Edina Public Schools Bus Garage and current car wash site) would
be purchased by Jerry's Enterprises, Inc. and redeveloped. The redevelopment area would be incorporated into the
existing jerry's Foods retail and office development. The northside project is contemplated to comprise and additional
19.600 square feet of retail space and up to 72,000 square feet of office space. An underbuilding/parking structure and
additional surface parking providing for approximately 400 cars would service the development. The ramp's design
would provide for the primary office parking access to Eden Avenue.
WMEP REDEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL
THE BEARD GROUP •SETTER LEACH & LINDSTROM Section A
4
i
I
I
�1 SITE PLAN - - -�� - —�
Site Access
The WMEP site is comprised of ten parcels totaling approximately 12.69 acres. The site is located in the heart of Edina,
with access to the site via Eden Avenue and Sherwood Ave. Adjacent to the site are full access interchanges to State
Highway 100, a major north/south artery, which can provide easy access to the entire Minneapolis and Saint Paul
metropolitan areas. The site's location is of strategic importance to WMEP in that the site's location provides immediate
quick access to all of WMEP's member districts thus minimizing student travel time.
Park Enhancement
Sherwood Park will be enlarged by 1 acre for a 54% increase in size resulting from the closing and abandonment of Eden
Circle and the acquisition of 5244 Eden Circle. In addition WMEP and the City will make improvements to the park
both in the passive recreational and children's play areas.
Eden Avenue Improvements
WMEP has retained a professional independent traffic consultant to study the development's impact on adjacent streets
and make recommendations.
WMEP REDEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL
THE BEARD GROUP • SETTER LEACH & LINDSTROM Section A
5
Current Site(s) Ownership
Completed Project Ownership
Lewis Engineering Site Edina HRA
Kunz Oil Site Edina HRA
5244 Eden Circle Edward Noonan
5201 Eden Circle Eden Circle LTD Partnership
The project's development team would attempt to accomplish the
acquisition of the non -HRA owned properties via direct contact
and negotiation with the individual property owners. Every effort
will be made to relocate the existing businesses displaced by the
project within the community.
WMEP
Elementary school, two full -size gyms and the 300 -seat theater.
City of Edina
Senior center, one (possibly two) full -size gyms.
Hennepin County Library
Library.
Edina Public Schools
Bus Garage.
WMEP REDEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL
THE BEARD GROUP • SETTER LEACH & LINDSTROM Section A
-6
Rl
Ell
TM
[19
[19
E19
119 DO
179
A
10 01"11
Los ,
Ell
M
a
s
119
131
IS,
M
(
1
Q
Ell
Ell
Eli
Ell
Ell r Ell
ED
Ell
"SNO-1,
'klll, -
Ell
Ell
Ell
i
r
'Ass
�
- .-
E.--
M
E�-_....I
>w:1._.l
'iS01—1
lSu E -1,
4
`.,
l..,
x.11
115
Lot
119 1-1
._. f
r , [
0
got
M
I �
s ��
&I
� A �
C
�3
A
r
via
[21
[13
t
E
—
3
=,
Eli
`
Ill
��Jj'''�
mil,
�
� [{
�
�
.,. J`._.. €!'��
`.3L���-ry
-
�
��4 %.,_; ..�1,]
�
1��
�t
' ��,
b� [
( \1
� �4
�`�._L_t
3mm4`�V
^�,
� \�,,�i
�""�E�i_l
179
[
i i`�,�
D',
4 4
E71
��5
> r
�t�
ill
try^ ll
1+e l
l
11-',
�' 4 �
§ *�, �� � ?
�' i
�� ,
Ell
ES
..�
p�.,
121
M
Ell
t
t��r
;l
�i._1
i,rib,f ,9x .?
L_.i�
wsa m
!km' P
-�
_
�
SO
i.,mt!
Ell
F..®:
G
_f
�
Lis
Q9
� P�
`�`
i
t
I
a
,its �.,y��
".
_
y i'i.
its ..
IS
R �
S�
Ig 1
11 pit
119
is
A
Ell
Ell
`
t-
Eli
Ell
Ell
�_..
�
s, _�
��J
Ewa
; �
w..
..
--, \9
?�` '
119
7 7
.- .�\+.1
1_"' \ } "�
IS
'__ t
119
7"� is""7
-���.
'F... -.
r�`t 1
i
a
?
Kj
Flo
t
Ks
M
Eli
Ell m
IY(
H
:'
11.1
e "
'-`
�
tE i
�
f. f
[is
�I _
(
L
IS R
"
gos
Fes" �
33
•_ 4 ,
P E_
L.
:115
- �P
__
. 2
_
,
SITE SIZE Lewis & Kunz
365,904 SF/
8.40 acres
5244 Eden Circle
26,136 SF/
.60 acres
Tag s Building
91,040 SF/
2.09 acres
520
483,080
19 acres
Sherwood Park
69,696 SF /
1.60 acres
-Total
552,776 SF
69 acres
BUILDING Elementary School
52,594
96,600 SF
SQUARE FOOTAGE Classrooms & Admin.
73,000
Yes
Two full -sized gyms
14,000
521
Theater
9,600
No
Senior Center
80,000
15,000
2- Additional Gyms
133
12,000
Hennepin County Library
Includes classroom /administration space and one full -
201000
Bus Garage
size gym. The second gym and theater are not included.
42,000
Admin. & Maintenance 4,400
Bus Storage
37,600
SQUARE FOOT ANALYSIS
PER SCHOOL SITE
Concord, Edina
76,950
608
608
126
No
Cornelia, Edina
57,600
520
520
111
Yes
Highlands, Edina
63,750
511
511
125
No
Countryside, Edina
52,594
486
510
108/103
Yes
Creek Valley, Edina
76,000
521
600
146/127
No
WMEP
80,000
600
600
133
Yes
Includes classroom /administration space and one full -
size gym. The second gym and theater are not included.
State g7tidelines are 120 square feet per student.
WMEP REDEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL
THE BEARD GROUP • SETTER LEACH & LINDSTROM Section
PROPERTY INFORMATION INDEX
`UhNCI.A
• -
• -
\JU71itlf
ULii1.Si
11
1
28- 117 -21 34 0018
unassigned
Edina HRA
Lewis Engineering/
5101 Vernon Ave. South
4801 50th St. W.
Kunz Oil
Edina, MN 55424
12
Edina. MN 55424
5220 Eden Avenue
ISD # 272
2
28- 117 -21 34 0019
5229 Eden Avenue
Edina HRA
Lewis Engineering/
4801 50th St. W.
Kunz Oil
Edina, MN 55424
Edina, MN 55424
13
28- 117 -21 34 0005
3
28- 117 -21 34 0020
5200 Eden Avenue
Edina HRA
Lewis Engineering/
Edina Public Schools
4801 50th St. W.
Kunz Oil
5701 Normandale Road
Edina, MN 55424
Edina, MN 55424
4
28-117-2133 0031
5233 Eden Avenue
Edina HRA
Lewis Engineering/
5101 Vernon Ave. South
4801 50th St. W.
Kunz Oil
Edina, MN 55424
Edina, MN 55424
5
28- 117 -21 34 0026
5209 Eden Avenue
Edina HRA
Lewis Engineering/
4801 50th St. W.
Kunz Oil
Edina, MN 55424
6
28- 117 -21 34 0022
unassigned
Edina HRA
Lewis Engineering/
4801 50th St. W.
Kunz Oil
Edina, MN 55424
7
28- 117 -21 33 0011
unassigned
Edina HR-k
Lewis Engineering/
8.40
4801 50th St. W.
Kunz Oil
Edina, MN 55424
8
28- 117 -21 33 0033
5244 Eden Circle
Edward M Noonan
Noonan Construction
0.60
6400 Timber Drive
Building
Edina, MN 55439
9
28- 117 -21 34 0021
5201 Eden Circle
Eden Circle Ltd. Partnership
Tags Building
2.09
5936 Kellogg Avenue
Cross Technologies
Edina, MN 55424
Building
10
28- 117 -21 33 0009
unassigned
Village of Edina
Sherwood Park
1.60
4801 West 50th St.
Edina, MN 55424
TOTAL 12.69 ACRES
NORTHSIDE PROJECT
WMEP REDEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL
THE BEARD GROUP •SETTER LEACH & LINDSTROM SeCUO[
8
11
28- 117 -21 34 0025
5201 Vernon Avenue
Jerry's Enterprises
Edina Car Wash
5101 Vernon Ave. South
Edina, MN 55424
12
28- 117 -21 34 0004
5220 Eden Avenue
ISD # 272
ESD Bus Garage
Edina Public Schools
5701 Normandale Road
Edina, MN 55424
13
28- 117 -21 34 0005
5150 Eden Avenue
ISD # 272
ESD Bus Garage
Edina Public Schools
5701 Normandale Road
Edina, MN 55424
14
28-117-21 33 0017
unassigned
Jerry's Enterprises
Edina Car Wash
5101 Vernon Ave. South
Edina, MN 55424
WMEP REDEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL
THE BEARD GROUP •SETTER LEACH & LINDSTROM SeCUO[
8
1
12 13
000000, 00
PLAT MAP
WMEP REDEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL
THE BEARD GROUP •SETTER LEACH & LINDSTROM Section
9
340
6.00 a.m.
70
55
125
215
7.00
93
55
148
192
8.00
93
55
148
192
9.00
93
19
55
167
173
10.00
93
38
60
55
246
94
11.00
93
56
60
28
237
103
Noon
93
75
60
28
256
84
1.00
93
75
60
28
256
84
2.00
93
75
60
55
283
57
3.00
93
75
76
55
299
41
4.00
93
75
76
55
299
41
5.00
23
75
76
28
202
138
6.00
50
106
56
76
288
52
7.00
50
106
38
76
270
70
8.00
50
106
76
232
108
9.00
50
106
57
213
127
10.00
50
106
156
184
11.00
0
340
Presently, city-owned property
on the site is R -1. This
proposal envisions changing
5244 Eden Circle and 5201
Eden Circle from present PID
classification to R -1; also,
5220 Eden Avenue and 5150
Eden Avenue from PID to C-
3.
Conditional use permits for
each of the uses, all of which
are permitted uses in R -1
classifications, are required.
WMEP REDEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL
THE BEARD GROUP • SETTER LEACH & LINDSTROM
Based on a strict interpretation
of parking requirements, with
no cross - parking agreements,
382 spaces are required.
Although it is feasible to
provide this amount on the
site, the proposal recommends
340 spaces based on the
parking analysis shown above.
The parking shown at the west
edge of the site does not
provide for the required ten
foot setback at the property
line. Although this setback can
be accomodated, site
circulation and grade changes
at this location suggest that
this provides for better land
use.
The proposal provides for
required building setbacks.
If the City elects to add one or
two gymnasia in addition to
the two provided in the
proposal, a setback of less than
fifty feet at the eastern
property line is required.
Section
10
�.
.o,
.- _
_
:�m�
:�
,� ..
�..�`
�_...�
-mow
r
.--- ,I.
El]
l l,
iL
t
1
2
`
<
o
t
l.l.
EE
E 3 i
&0
Gil
oil
Ell t
oil j
` J
t
......i':
_
.-
k 7
� _
��
�
._
\.:?
j `�`�
"'"�y
�
F
7
t
,
Ell
Ell
Ell
Ell
Ell
Ell
V
Ell
Ell
2
R
F
7
..,...E
i
_t_
W
_.1 t
9
51
IT
D
_
l_
�.:..
..F.__{
j
,....'s....=
�
.l...3
�_. as
�,....
,�2F�
...$
�1
_....
..Aa.J
r
'�` "
c
Imo;
119
Ill
T
Eli
t
Ell
Ell
R
l!
Q\
Il
W
bV
`
!
r
r
t
i
I
W
..
i
.
y
l [
4
W
� -.
b ]
\ c
\
W
Q
W
Ell
J
y
\ i
,
Ell
..
..
- ,
r
_
.tom—
_
_.,
�
"._.
.._
,
r
s
PC]
Ell
Ell
F11
Ell
Ell
t
i
}
,
3.
it]
of]
Ell
W
Ell
Ell
U
Ell
Eli
Ell
so] Ell
rK
0
Ia
Ell
G
r
5`
}t
*
ap'•
f
IT
I
m
7 \
o
0
t
I
,. C
{
f
_
7
i
LL
l
e 1
}
_i
'
_
G
J
t §
11
Ell
\
\
_ "
x
\ t
{
~i
E`
[19
a
t
i i
I
,
•.
°'i ..
}
'
E ti
:4 �
t��
:..., ?,�.,�
'
r �;�.,�-
of �xr ,
� •��
}�-'
�� ni
"'c�a
�.
{
�
mm
L
4
1
S
,
tom- -s
pit
. —
F0
-
.,
r
�
t
t \
t
._..
A
.....m.._I
[—.s
19
r �
E
M
" I
ET]
3
j �
1
, <
�
,l
•.
"",
tit_
k 4„ k
� ' 4
�LL`�
8, �•,..�
Y" ;. I .� ?:
171
A
1"
",
s
(
Ell
E
L j
[oil
CA
i
l
t
'd
IL",_
:\ _ - I
0CF, .. `
o ...
`
. ".°s°�i •'(
. ' 1 `d
. �.,
i 's`4"cf f ice..
3 Ail
[ "a`t � � .,
I �i9.!: �. �
� ,. .�'{ . Q I
ED AT IA
SENIOR
4 •' � C�1�a� � jtIfJ1TE
LIBRARY
r
PARKI -
— 3
� ■ R
�ws`r
#* -
*, . _ _ y LK
a
Tl-
S
k ( I . i -
V-11t r-- �-
Au
I
9 rk4L.C-.
ar jr
SITE
UNDER -DECK
FOUR -GYM
u�
11'
i
�..�.. • +ter`-
_ •• '� --`
• � � � •tea' � �' � � �
_}•,s . i� _ Wit• _`.
_ tr
+
1
•
1�
3 .
to
�1 %1
+fie. 1
View looking out from WMEP site, towards Eden Avenue.
WMEP REDEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL
THE BEARD GROUP • SETTER LEACH & LINDSTROM Section
12
Gam,_ f
View from Eden Avenue.
Architect's rendering.
WMEP REDEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL
THE BEARD GROUP • SETTER LEACH & LINDSTROM Section D_
13
WMEP Redevelopment Proposal
Eden Avenue
Edina, Minnesota
Project Team
WMEP Board Member and EDS Superintendent Dr. Kenneth Dragseth
WMEP Supervisor and EDS Assit. Superintendent for Elementary Ed. Dr. Terry Tofte
WMEP Board Chair and EDS Board Member Frank Bennett, Esquire
Project Coordinator
Setter Leach & Linstrom Architects & Engineers
The Beard Group, Inc.
Bill Beard President
Principal John P. Litchy, AIA
Project Manager Jerry Ritter. AIA
Director of Design Chuck Knight, AIA
Senior Project Architect Frank A. Anderson
Participants in Program & Design Development
Senior Administrative Manager
Hennepin County Library
Edina City Staff
WMEP REDEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL
THE BEARD GROUP • SETTER LEACH & LINDSTROM
David R. Cramer
.SCCUUIl E I
14
[G :RO IIUV
INTRODUCTION
Summary of Principals
The Beard Group, Inc.
THE BEARD GROUP, INC.
The Beard Group, Inc. uses adaptive project delivery methods for the most effective
owner representation possible. With continual changes in the financial, real estate, retail
and construction industries and the constant demand for increased efficiency, The
Beard Group, Inc. tailors its services to a system of development and project
management that best meets the needs of each client and its particular situation.
Our development team of highly skilled, knowledgeable, professional people has
experience in all areas of project analysis, design, real estate development, finance and
construction. The development staff works closely with our consultants and contract
personnel to ensure cost effective, high quality design and workmanship for each
project.
PRINCIPALS
WILLIAM H. BEARD Mr. Beard is a principal -in- charge of project analysis, project design, site location,
leasing and development for The Beard Group, Inc. He founded the firm in 1990 to
provide development and commercial real estate brokerage services.
Areas of Expertise include:
♦ Project management services from pre- entry /pre - development stages through to
store opening.
♦ Complete concept development.
♦ Site location specialist for national retail chains
♦ Hospitality Sector Expertise with national recognition and speaking engagements.
PAUL M. GAMST Mr. Gamst is a principal with The Beard Group. Inc. with broad expertise in brokerage.
leasing, property development and construction.
Mr. Gamst works closely with the design and construction teams to diligently pursue the
owner's objectives. This insures that budget constraints are met, but equally important,
he focuses on the quality, workmanship and details that give character and life to each
project.
His comprehensive and effective construction administration produces quality
construction at the best value.
{
WMEP REDEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL
THE BEARD GROUP • SETTER LEACH & UNDSTROM SecrionE
15
I N C
EDUCATION
WILLIAM H. BEARD
President
The Beard Group, Inc.
Bachelor of Arts. Whitworth College, Spokane Washington
PROFESSIONAL Minnesota Children's Museum, Board Member
REGISTRATIONS AND Crisis Nursery, Board Member
AFFILIATIONS Hopkins Center for the Arts, Board Member
Metro East Development Partnership, St. Paul, MN
Licensed Real Estate Broker
Member Twin West Chamber of Commerce
Member Minnesota Shopping Center Association
EXPERIENCE Mr. Beard founded the Beard Group. Inc. in 1990 to provide brokerage. real
estate development, and advisory services to commercial corporate clients.
property owners and retailers on an exclusive basis. Services encompass all
areas of development from pre- entry /pre - development through to opening.
PRIOR EXPERIENCE Prior to forming The Beard Group, Inc., Mr. Beard was executive Vice President
and General Partner of Professional Ventures, Inc., a real estate development
company. He oversaw all site selection and pre - development analysis.
In 1985 Mr. Beard was president of Webb Enterprises, owners of Rupert's
Nightclubs, The American Cafe and Cocolezzone. During this time he directed
the opening of Cocolezzone, recognized as one of America's best new
restaurants. He directed the expansion of Rupert's Nightclub into Atlanta and St.
Louis.
In 1983, Mr. Beard was president of Management Development Seminars for
Selection Research, Inc., a company owned by Gallop Polls. He led seminars on
employee recruitment, selection, development, and compensation programs. He
also recruited executive, managerial, sales and support people for client
companies on a national and international basis. In 1980, Mr. Beard was
president and Chief Operating Officer of Omni Foods in Spokane, Washington,
responsible for the operation of various restaurant chains.
L / WMEP REDEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL
THE BEARD GROUP • SETTER LEACH & LINDSTROM SCCCIU
l 16
PAUL M. GANIST
• The Beard Group, Inc.
I N C
PROFESSIONAL Licensed Real Estate Broker
REGISTRATIONS AND Member Twin West Chamber of Commerce
AFFILIATIONS Member Minnesota Shopping Center Association
EXPERIENCE Mr. Gamst is a principal with The Beard Group with expertise in brokerage.
leasing. property development and construction.
PRIOR EXPERIENCE Mr. Gamst was Vice President of Professional Ventures Inc. for 10 years. He
was responsible for all phases of construction and project development
including project budget, construction quality and scheduling.
Over a 15 -year period Mr. Gamst worked in construction related fields, advising
in new construction, building remodeling and property renovation. He has an
expansive background in masonry construction for buildings, highways and
bridges.
WMEP REDEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL
THE BEARD GROUP • SETTER LEACH & LINDSTROM SeCLlon E i
17
John Litchy, AIA
Pringpal
John's skills include adherence to project budgets and schedules, commitment
to high quality service and documents, ability to lead and facilitate complex
design teams, and the development of educationally innovative design solu-
tions. John will lead the project effort by: managing design reviews by govern-
ing agencies, coordinating efforts with the site -based team and the community,
and meeting your objectives for quality, budget, and schedule. He will also
work with our Construction Administration Department to observe your
project during construction.
Project Experience
MINNEAPOLIS SPECIAL SCHOOL DISTRICT 1
Security Study (in progress)
Floyd B. Olson School Middle School
Marcy Open School
Richard Green School Security
Southwest High School Addition & Remodeling
Ramsey Junior High School Remodeling
Franklin Junior High School
Minneapolis, MN
COLUMBIA HEIGHTS SCHOOL DISTRICT
District -Wide Planning /Design
District -Wide Technology Planning/
Implementation
Columbia Heights, MN
FRIDLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT
District Wide Facility Study /Design
Fridley, MN
EDINA SCHOOL DISTRICT
District Wide Facility Study /Design
Edina, MN
WHITE BEAR LAKE SCHOOL DISTRICT
District Wide Modernization, Addition,
Remodeling & Referendum Support
White Bear Lake, MN
WAYZATA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Referendum Support, Remodeling & Addition
Wayzata, MN
THE BLAKE SCHOOLS
Addition & Remodeling (Northrup Campus)
Lower & Middle School Renovation &
Performing Arts Center (Hopkins Campus)
Minneapolis, MN
RICHFIELD SCHOOL DISTRICT
Legion Lake Study
Richfield, MN
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO, 252
Elementary School Adaptive Reuse
High School Science Wing Upgrade
Cannon Falls, MN
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT NO.2SS
Addition & Remodeling
Pine Island, MN
LEGION LAKE SCHOOL
Evaluation
Richfield, MN
IDS /NSP
Downtown Open School
Minneapolis, MN
MINNEAPOLIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
AGENCY
Fraser Early Childhood Family Development
Center
Park Place Early Childhood Family
Development
Center
Minneapolis, MN
PARENTS IN COMMUNITY ACTION
'Towne Hall Early Childhood Family Development
Center
Brooklyn Park, MN
PROJECT TEAM
Resumes of Key Personnel
Education University of
Minnesota, Architecture
St. John's University
Registration Minnesota, Architecture,
Registration No. 10393
Wisconsin Architecture,
Registration No. A8425
NCARB Certificate
Professional Affiliations American Institute of
Architects
American Institute of
Architects - Minnesota
Minnesota Department
of Children, Families &
Learning
Accreditation in Audits
of School Facility
Accessibility
Council of Educational
Facility Planners -
International
WMEP REDEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL
THE BEARD GROUP • SETTER LEACH & LINDSTROM Section E I
- -�18
Jerome A. Ritter, AIA
Project Manager
Jerry will be responsible for managing the project. He will work with the
design tearn and owner representatives to provide direction for all aspects of
the project. With over 30 years of experience he brings the management skills
and relevant project experience to design and manage this project.
Project Experience
EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Early Childhood Family Education Center
Concord Elementary
Cornelia Elementary
Countryside Elementary
Creek Valley Elementary
Edina Community Center
Edina High School
Highlands Elementary
Life Safety Improvements at Nine Schools
Southview Middle School
Valley View Middle School
French Immersion Media Center Remodel
(Phase 2)
Edina, MN
MINNEAPOLIS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
AGENCY
Fraser Early Childhood Family Development
Center
Park Place Early Childhood Family
Development Center
Minneapolis, MN
HOLY ROSARY SITE EARLY CHILDHOOD CENTER
Minneapolis, MN
MINNEAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Downtown Open School
Floyd B. Olsen Middle School
Marcy Open School
Richard B. Green Central Park School (security)
Southwest High School
Minneapolis, MN
THE BLAKE SCHOOLS
Northrup Campus Science & Library Addition
Hopkins Campus Performing Arts Center
Addition
CANNON FALLS SCHOOL
Cannon Falls Elementary Schools
Cannon Falls, MN
PINE ISLAND SCHOOLS
Pine Island School Addition & Remodeling
Pine Island, MN
SOUTH ST. PAUL SCHOOLS
South St. Paul. MIN
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
Borlaug Teaching & Research Center
Morrill Hall Parking Ramp & Plaza
Telecommunications Center
Business Administration Building
Shepherd Labs- Electron Microscopy
Health Sciences Complex Units B & C
PARENTS IN COMMUNITY ACTION
Towne Hall Early Childhood Family Development
Center
Brooklyn Park, MN
MINNESOTA CENTER FOR ARTS EDUCATION
Temporary Facility
Golden Valley, MN
ROSEVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Roseville, MN
HAMLINE UNIVERSITY
Swimming Pool Renovation Study
St. Paul. MN
PROJECT TEAM
Resumes of Key Personnel
Education University Of Illinois
Bachelor of Architecture
University of Wisconsin
Programs On Quality
Control
Production Systems
Computer Applications
University Of Minnesota
Programs on Fire
Management & Life
Safety Computer
Programming
Registration Architect
Minnesota No. 10578
Also registered in 15
other states
NCARB - Certified
Professional Affiliations American Institute of
Architects - Minnesota
Minneapolis
Rehabilitation Center -
Advisory Committee
WMEP REDEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL
THE BEARD GROUP • SETTER LEACH & LINDSTROM Section E _
�19
Charles Knight, AIA
Director rf 'Desig7)
Chuck leads the conceptual design efforts for our firm. With over 17 years of
experience. he has translated the visions of a diverse clientele into extraordi-
nary architecture all over the world. Chuck will work directly with you and the
project teach to create an architectural desig c that will meet your needs.
Project Eeperimce (includes work with otherftrms)
EASTERN HEIGHTS STATE BANK
Woodbury, MN DELL COMPUTER
Storage Facility Master Plan
ST. MARY'S MEDICAL CENTER Austin,TX
Pierre, SD
GILLETTE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
St. Paul, MN
ALLENTOWN MEDICAL CENTER
Allentown, PA
HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER
Skyway & Emergency Center
Minneapolis, MN
RAMSEY HOSPITAL
Burn Unit
Ramsey, MN
MOOSE LAKE PSYCHOPATHIC PRISON HOSPITAL
Moose Lake, MN
KPJ HOSPITAL
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
NORTH MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER
Ambulatory Center
Robbinsdale, MN
UNITED CHILDREN'S AMBULATORY CENTER
St. Paul, MN
MAYO CLINIC
Cannon Valley Clinic
Faribault, MN
MEDISTRA MEDICAL CENTER
Jakarta, Malaysia
UNITED HEALTHCARE
Minneapolis, MN
J.B. GOODMAN INC.
Elderly, Skilled, Limited Memory & Assisted
Housing
Flagstaff, AZ Sedona, AZ
Timber Pines, FL Eagan, MN
SETIU MEDICAL CENTER
Setiu, Malaysia
SYSCO
Mounds View, MN
COMO PARK BOTANICAL GARDENS
Como Park Education & Resource Center
St. Paul, MN
LAWSON SOFTWARE
Corporate Office Building
St. Paul, MN
3M
Integrated Solutions Center
Corporate Air Center
St. Paul, MN
DOW CHEMICAL CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS
Midland, MI
STATE FARM INSURANCE
Corporate Regional Center (Bakersfield, CA)
Energy Center (Bloomington, IL)
CONOCO OIL CORPORATION
International Offices & Housing
Luanda, Angola
WALT DISNEY WORLD
City of Celebration Senior Housing
Celebration City, FL
CARLSON REAL ESTATE COMPANY
Minnetonka, MN
CARLSON COMPANY
Minneapolis, MN
MEDIAONE
Regional District Office
Eagan, MN
PENANG GLENEAGLES
Corporate Office Building
PRAIRIE LAKES APARTMENTS
Peoria, IL
SETTER LEACH & LINDSTROM
Resumes of Key Personnel
Education University of Illinois
Masters Architecture
Design
Oklahoma State
University
Bachelor of Architecture
Registration Architect
Illinois No.
001 - 014093
Professional Affiliations National Historical
Society
American Institute of
Architects
College Review Board
Oklahoma State
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
77th Air Command Bomb Squadron
Headquarters
Ellsworth AFB, SO
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
Youth Center
Ellworth AFB, NO
SANTA CLARA CONVENTION CENTER
Addition
Santa Clara, CA
SALT LAKE CITY CONVENTION CENTER
Salt Lake City, UT
LOUISVILLE CONVENTION CENTER
Louisville, KY
MINNEAPOLIS CONVENTION CENTER
Minneapolis, MN
CLOSED CUSTODY MAXIMUM SECURITY PRISON
Rush City, MN
MITSUBISHI EXPOSITION CENTER
Japan
WMEP REDEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL
THE BEARD GROUP • SETTER LEACH & LINDSTROM Section E t
20
Frank A. Anderson, RA
Sr. Pre jest Architect
Frank will be responsible for the design of your project. He will work closely
with the Project Manager and the client in developing your facility and has 20
years of professional experience.
Prr ject Experience (includes work with other finns)
WHITE BEAR LAKE SCHOOL DISTRICT
Addition & Remodeling to 14 Schools
White Bear, MN
MINNEAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Marcy Open School
Floyd B. Olson Middle School
Southwest High School Addition
Minneapolis, MN
FRIDLEY PUBLIC SCHOOLS
New Building
Remodeling of Middle School and High School
Fridley, MN
EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Remodeling & Renovation
Senior High School
Concord Elementary School
French Immersion Media Center Remodel
(Phase 2)
Edina, MN
CHISAGO LAKES PRIMARY SCHOOL
Classroom & Office Expansion
Chisago Lakes, MN
SANDSTONE PUBLIC SCHOOLS
New Senior High School
Sandstone, MN
ANNANDALE PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Senior High Industrial Shop Addition
Annandale, MN
NORWOOD -YOUNG AMERICA PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Earth- sheltered Primary School
Junior & Senior High School Expansion
Norwood, MN
ALEXANDRIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Elementary School Addition
Junior High School
Senior High School
Alexandria, MN
GRANITE FALLS PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Classroom & Gymnasium Addition
Granite Falls, MN
WMEP REDEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL
THE BEARD GROUP • SETTER LEACH & LINDSTROM
COLLEGE OF ST.THOMAS
Science & Math Professors Office Addition
St. Paul, MN
MORRISTOWN PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Classroom & Industrial Shop Addition
Morristown, MN
DASSEL - COKATO PUBLIC SCHOOLS
School Remodeling
Dassel, MN
BERTHA - HEWITT PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Classroom Addition
Bertha, MN
STEWARTVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Classroom Addition
Junior & Senior High School Addition &
Remodeling
Stewartville, MN
CITY OF OAKDALE
New Municipal Building
Oakdale, MN
COLUMBIA HEIGHTS SCHOOL DISTRICT
North Park Elementary School Addition and
Remodel
Central Middle School Addition
Columbia Heights, MN
BEAVER DAM UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Washington Elementary School Addition
Wilson Elementary School Addition
Lincoln Elementary School Addition
Beaver Dam High School Addition and Remodel
Beaver Dam, WI
MILTONA PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Elementary Classroom Addition
Miltona, MN
MANTORVILLE PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Elementary Classroom Addition
Mantorville, MN
PROJECT TEAM
Resumes of Key Personnel
Education North Dakota State
University
B.S. Architectural Studies
North Dakota State
University
Bachelor of Architecture
Registration Architecture
Minnesota No. 23530
Wisconsin
Certified Interior
Designer
Minnesota No. C00968
SeCUUR E �
21
Decision
■■ Resources Ltd.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
West Metro Education Program
Edina Residential Survey
Methodology:
• Survey of 400 randomly selected residents of the City of Edina.
• Survey of 250 randomly selected parents/guardians of children in the Edina Public
Schools.
• Average interview time of seventeen minutes.
• Telephone interviews completed between February 2 and 19, 1999.
• Results projectable to the universe of adult Edina residents within t 5.0 percent in 95 out
of 100 cases.
• Results projectable to the universe of parents/guardians of children in the Edina Public
Schools within f 6.3 percent in 95 out of 100 cases.
Key Findings:
L Do residents and parents support the school in Edina?
Both residents overall and parents/guardians of Edina Public School students support the proposal
to locate a new elementary school in Edina open to students from all nine school districts,
including Minneapolis. Within both groups, "strong support" was relatively equal to "strong
opposition."
Parents /Guardians All Residents
Support 55% 53%
Oppose 28% 27%
Unsure 19% 21%
In both cases, the margin of support over opposition was approximately two -to -one.
3128 Dean Court • Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416 • (612) 920-0337 • Fax (612)929 -6166
ip
H. What are the facts?
In assessing features of the proposal, majorities of both residents and parents/guardians were
"more likely" to support the school when informed:
• The site acquisition and the construction of the new elementary school building will be
paid for completely by state funds. (54% of parents/guardians; 52% of residents)
• Operation of the new elementary school will be paid by the State of Minnesota, not with
additional property taxes on Edina homeowners. (69% of parents /guardians; 60% of
residents)
• No Edina School District children from other schools will be required to transfer to the
new elementary school; all enrollment will be completely voluntary. (68% of
parents/guardians; 62% of residents)
• The new elementary school will include two regulation sized gyms, a theater with state-of-
the-art technology, computer lab facilities, and a playground; all of these facilities will be
available for community use after school hours. (66% of parents/guardians; 58% of
residents)
• As a result of the proposal, the City of Edina will be able to expand municipal office space
and improve the public library and senior citizens center facilities at a substantial cost
savings for city residents. (63% of parents/guardians; 60% of residents)
III. Who should attend the school?
In general, majorities of both parents/guardians and residents favored children of color from
Minneapolis attending Edina Public Schools.
Favor
Oppose
Unsure
Parents /Guardians All Residents
61% 63%
26% 24%
13% 14%
"Strongly favor" outnumbered "strongly oppose" by two -to -one in each group.
IV Would parent&/ wardians.choose the school for their child?
Sixteen percent of parents/guardians "strongly agreed" with the statement, "if my child were of
elementary school age, I would see great value for him or her attending this type of inter- district
magnet school."
Page 2
Conclusions:
The proposed WMEP elementary school in Edina has great support among both parents/
guardians and residents, in general. In both cases, support outnumbers opposition by nearly two -
to -one. Hence, there is a widespread basis of backing for the magnet school. Similarly, large
majorities of residents and parents/guardians do not oppose children of color from Minneapolis
attending Edina Public Schools, indicating approval of Metropolitan Area de- segregation efforts.
However, to strengthen support and persuade undecided residents, there are several key
information messages which should be reinforced: the voluntary nature of attending the school,
the funding by the State of Minnesota — not the Edina Public School District, and the benefits to
the community as a whole.
The results of this study clearly show a receptivity among most residents toward the WMEP
Magnet School and more than enough interest among Edina parents to make it successful in this
community.
Page 3
IFBENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES, INC.
TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS
10417 EXCELSIOR BOULEVARD, SUITE TWO / HOPKINS, MN 55343 / (612) 238-1667 / FAX (612) 238 -1671
April 2, 1999 Refer to File: 99 -30
MEMORANDUM
TO: William H. Beard, The Beard Group
,T p
FROM: James A. Benshoof a d Kenneth W. Anderson
RE: Preliminary Traffic Analysis Results for WMEP Redevelopment Proposal
in the City of Edina
PURPOSE
This report presents our preliminary findings of the traffic effects from the proposed
redevelopment of a 12.69 acre site (the WMEP site) south of Eden Avenue and east of
Sherwood Road. Also, for completeness purposes, this report addresses potential
redevelopment of property on the north side of Eden Avenue, across from the WMEP
site.
Based on your direction and requests by City staff, we have focused on addressing the
following three questions:
a) How many trips will be generated by the proposed redevelopment and how
does this trip generation relate to the number of trips generated by prior
development on the subject properties?
b) To what extent will the proposed redevelopment affect the intersection of
Sherwood Road, Eden Avenue, and Link Road, especially the ability of
residents living to the south to gain access to Eden Avenue and Link Road?
c) Will the number of parking spaces included in the WMEP redevelopment plan
likely be sufficient to meet the development's needs?
In addressing the preceding questions, we performed a detailed review and carefully
attempted to account for all relevant factors. The remainder of this memorandum is
organized as follows:
- Proposed New Land Uses
- Existing Land Uses to be Removed
Mr. William H. Beard -2- April 2, 1999
- Existing Peak Hour Trafific Movements
- Effects of Proposed Redevelopment on Peak Hour Trip Generation
- Review of Parking Adequacy
- Conclusions
PROPOSED NEW LAND USES
The WMEP Redevelopment proposal provides a combination of several land uses, which
share parking and site access driveways. Specifically, two driveways are proposed along
Eden Avenue plus one on Sherwood Road just south of Eden Avenue. Each of these
access points serves a parking area, which is related to specific areas of the building
campus. Specific uses in the WMEP Redevelopment Proposal are:
• Magnet School — A K -5 elementary school with up to 600 students (36,500
square feet of classroom and administration space on each of two floors for a
total of 73,000 square feet of space).
• Gymnasium — Two 7,000 square foot gyms will be build in conjunction with
the magnet school which will be available for public use after school hours. A
future addition of two 6,000 square foot gyms is contemplated at full potential
development.
• Theater —A 300 seat (9,600 square foot) theater is proposed for use by the
magnet school. This facility will also be available to the public during
evening hours.
• Library — Hennepin County will operate a 20,000 square foot public library at
this site.
• Senior Center — The City of Edina will operate a 15,000 square foot senior
center at this location.
• Bus Garage — Edina Public Schools will relocate their bus garage under the
WMEP parking deck. This facility will house 56 school buses in a 37,600
square foot area plus 4,400 square feet of administrative /maintenance space.
• Park — An existing City Park will be expanded from 1.74 acres to 2.68 acres.
To address the traffic implications in a complete context, we also have accounted for
potential redevelopment on the north side of Eden Avenue. As previously mentioned, the
existing bus garage would be relocated from this site to the WMEP site. The two new
development components would be:
Mr. William H. Beard -3- April 2, 1999
• Office building with about 72,000 square feet. The parking for this building
would have its access on Eden Avenue opposite the main driveway for the
WMEP Redevelopment.
• Expansion of Jerry's Supermarket by about 19,600 square feet. This
development and its parking would be served by existing access on Vernon
Avenue.
EXISTING LAND USES TO BE REMOVED
Changes have already occurred on the WMEP site. A 30,000 square foot office
warehouse has been removed and a 40,000 square foot manufacturing building is empty
and ready for demolition. These uses are referenced as the Lewis -Kunz Buildings. A
30,000 square foot, two story office building (the Noonan Building) and a 30,000 square
foot, two story building housing a gymnasium and office/shop complex (the Tags
building) will be removed as part of this project.
North of Eden Avenue, the Edina car wash and the bus garage will be removed to make
room for the Jerry's expansion and the new office building and parking facility.
EXISTING PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC MOVEMENTS
The proposed changes in land use will alter the flow of traffic to and from the sites and
will impact traffic movements on the surrounding street system. From a traffic analysis
standpoint, the primary concerns pertain to Sherwood Road, Eden Avenue, and Link
Road.
On Wednesday, March 24, 1999 and Thursday, March 25, 1999, we conducted a.m. and
p.m. peak period manual turn movement counts at the intersections of Sherwood Road
with Eden Circle and with Link Road. These counts are shown in Figure 1.
Based on these studies and earlier data provided by the City, we determined that the peak
traffic periods occur from 7:45 to 8:45 a.m. and from 5:00 to 6:00 p.m. Our evaluation of
the proposed land use changes is focused on changes in traffic flow during these peak
hours.
E. 179/207 EDENAVE/(UE
30!75
237/2y5
4/A 67
N _o
M
(3 °p cV
W
EDEN C /RCS
5 /y0j
0/0
T �
� T
N
A.M. PEAK HOUR
(7:45 - 8:45 A.M.)
F
P.M. PEAK HOUR
NOT TO SCALE I (5:00 - 6:00 P.M.)
XX=
WEST METRO PRELIMINARY TRAFFIC FIGURE 1
EDUCATION PROGRAM REVIEW FOR WMEP
REDEVELOPMENT EXISTING TRAFFIC
BEN SHOOF ASSOCIATES, INC. PROPOSAL VOLUMES
TRANSPORTATIONENOINEERSANDPUNNERS
Mr. William H. Beard -5- April 2, 1999
EFFECTS OF PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT ON PEAK HOUR TRIP
GENERATION
As previously mentioned, one of the fundamental questions addressed in this review is
the extent to which the proposed redevelopment would change the number of vehicle
trips generated by the subject properties. To answer this point, we carefully accounted
for each prior land use and each new use on the subject properties. For this purpose, we
have taken a conservative approach, namely to account for the proposed land uses when
they are exceptionally "busy." For example, event scheduling and season of the year
heavily influence the trip generation for two uses in the WMEP redevelopment (theater
and gymnasium). On many weekdays neither of these uses has much trip generating
activity during the 7:45 to 8:45 a.m. and 5:00 to 6:00 p.m. peak hours. On other days,
one of the two uses would be busy. On a few days, both uses may generate a significant
number of vehicle trips during the p.m. peak hour. An example of this situation would be
a large number of persons arriving for basketball practice or games in the gymnasiums
and for a practice or performance in the theater. Though this situation is expected to be
quite infrequent, our trip generation projections account for this high level of activity
during the p.m. peak hour for both the gymnasiums and the theater.
The overall trip generation results are shown in Table 1. As noted, the net effect of the
WMEP Redevelopment is to increase the trip generation for its site by 150 trip ends
during the a.m. peak hour and 200 trip ends during the p.m. peak hour. The potential
redevelopment on the north side of Eden Avenue would cause a modest increase in trip
generation to /from Eden Avenue and a greater increase in trips to /from Vernon Avenue.
Having addressed the overall effect on trip generation, the next step is to allocate the
change in the number of trips generated among the particular access points to and from
the new developments. The results are shown in Figure 2. One important point noted in
this figure is that the WMEP Redevelopment proposal will result in practically no net
change in volumes using Sherwood Road. The number of trips eliminated through
demolition of the Noonan and Tags Buildings is practically the same as new trips to and
from the west parking lot for the WMEP Redevelopment proposal. Most of the increase
in trips to and from the WMEP site would occur at the main driveway on Eden Avenue,
which would be opposite the driveway for the new office development.
Mr. William H. Beard -6- April 2, 1999
TABLE 1
CHANGES IN PEAK HOUR TRIP GENERATION')
AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR
Land Use Inbound Outbound Inbound Outbound
WMEP Site
Magnet School
105
75
20
30
Gymnasium
-
-
60
10
Theater
-
-
100
10
Library
15
5
60
70
Senior Center
20
5
20
40
Bus Garage
15
10
5
30
Lewis — Kunz
-50
-20
-20
-50
Noonan — Tags
-20
-5
-85
-100
Net Change
80
70
160
40
North Side Project
(Eden Avenue Only
Office Building
100
15
20
90
Bus Garage
-15
-10
-5
-30
Car Wash
-10
-10
-20
-20
Net Change
75
-5
-5
40
North Side Project
(Vernon Avenue Only)
Jerry's Foods
95
100
125
110
Trip generation projections developed based on information provided by project participants and on data
published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers
pF9
cOFq�F
ss NVF
9�'y
iio
JERRY'S
NORTHSIDE PROJECT
0,gO
DRIVEWAY �
EDEN AVENUE
N ,� II
O� �� yT
C� 0
fr
NOT TO SCALE N WESTERLY EASTERLY
ir
ir PARKING PARKING
F��mlOD ROAD
PARKING AREA WMEP PROJECT
NOTE: NEGATIVE NUMBER MEANS THAT PLANNED A.M. PEAK HOUR
DEVELOPMENT WOULD GENERATE FEWER
TRIPS THAN PRIOR EXISTING DEVELOPMENT. P.M. PEAK HOUR I I
POSITIVE NUMBER MEANS THAT PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT WOULD GENERATE MORE TRIPS. XK=
WEST METRO FIGURE 2
EDUCATION PROGRAM PRELIMINARY TRAFFIC
REVIEW FOR WMEP CHANGES IN PEAK
REDEVELOPMENT HOUR VOLUMES
BENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES, INC. PROPOSAL DEVELOPMENTS UE
TRANSPORTATIONENOINEERSANDPUNNERS
Mr. William H. Beard -8- April 2, 1999
REVIEW OF PARKING ADEQUACY
As indicated at the beginning of this report, one of our primary purposes has been to
determine whether the WMEP Redevelopment plan likely will provide sufficient parking
spaces to meet its needs. The present plan includes a total of 340 parking spaces, which
are allocated as follows:
Sherwood Road parking area - 107 spaces
Central parking area - 177 spaces
Eastern parking area - 56 spaces
We understand that the eastern parking area also will serve as a bus drop off/pick up
zone. In order to adequately accommodate that function, the parking spaces along the
west curb in the eastern parking area will need to be restricted during weekday daytime
hours. Thus, during weekday daytime hours, the parking supply in the eastern parking
area will be reduced by 24 spaces to a total of 32 available spaces. The total on -site
parking supply during weekday daytime hours would be 316 spaces.
The WMEP Redevelopment Proposal report dated March 23, 1999, includes a parking
analysis table, which presents the parking demand for each use in the development by
hour of the day. For each hour, the total parking demand is calculated and correlated
with the available supply of 340 spaces. This analysis indicates that the peak parking
demand will occur between 3:00 and 5:00 p.m., during which 299 spaces will be used. A
secondary peak would occur at about 6:00 p.m. when 288 spaces would be used.
The peak demand of 299 parked vehicles would approach capacity because during the
early portion of this 3:00 to 5:00 p.m. period the parking supply would be limited to 316
vehicles. The secondary peak of 288 parked vehicles could be effectively accommodated
because the overall supply at that 6:00 p.m. time is 340 spaces.
We have reviewed the parking demand values by land use and by hour of the day as
presented in the redevelopment proposal report and as summarized above. For this
purpose, we have correlated with typical standards and published experiences. From this
review, we have determined that the parking demand values presented in the
redevelopment proposal report are reasonable for purposes of evaluating the parking
adequacy for the WMEP project. In fact, we believe that the parking demand values
shown for the senior center and library uses may be slightly higher than will actually be
experienced.
In addition to evaluating parking adequacy over the entire site, it also is important to
address the relationship of parking supply to demand in each of the three parking areas.
The first step is to understand the planned entrances for the buildings. Entrances to the
library, the senior center, and the theater will be designed so that they can be accessed
from either the Sherwood Road parking area or the Central parking area. The school is
designed so that bussed students will be dropped off and picked up in the Eastern parking
Mr. William H. Beard -9- April 2, 1999
area, and that most parking and parent drop off/pick up will occur in the Central parking
area.
Given these entrance arrangements, we then sought to understand current intentions
regarding where particular users likely would park. In this context, we understand that
the Sherwood Road parking area primarily will be used by patrons of the library and
senior center. The Central parking area principally will be for visitors and for employees
of the school, bus operation, library, and senior center.
With the parking orientations described above, a high likelihood exists that parking
demand would exceed supply in the afternoon period for the Sherwood Road and Central
parking areas. A suggested step to alleviate this difficulty is to encourage employees of
the bus operation to park in the eastern parking area.
Another item that we have addressed in a preliminary manner is the layout of the parking
areas and the associated traffic ingress /egress and circulation arrangements. In this
context, we have identified several issues, including:
At the driveway serving the central parking area, the spacing between Eden
Avenue and the drive connecting to the Sherwood Road parking area is quite
close.
No connection is presently provided between the central and eastern parking
areas. In this situation, motorists would have to use Eden Avenue to drive
from one area to the other, which is not desirable. Two options for
alleviating this potential difficulty are: a) provide a driveway to connect the
central and eastern parking areas or b) install signing on the entrance to the
eastern parking area which limits its use to motorists that could be
accommodated by the spaces available in that area.
• The layout of several parking rows and aisles would cause some awkward
circumstances.
We are confident that all of these issues can be effectively resolved through further
analysis and refinement of the site plan during subsequent phases of the development
process.
Mr. William H. Beard -10- April 2, 1999
CONCLUSIONS
Based on the information presented in this report, we have established the following
conclusions relative to the three principal questions that this study has addressed:
a) How many trips will be generated by the proposed redevelopment and how does this
trip generation relate to the number of trips generated by prior development on the
subject properties?
• During the a.m. peak hour (7:45 to 8:45 a.m.), the WMEP Redevelopment
proposal will generate about 150 more trip ends than the prior development on
this property.
During the p.m. peak hour (5:00 to 6:00 p.m.), the WENT Redevelopment
proposal will generate about 200 more trip ends on days when both the
gymnasiums and theater have high trip generation activities during this hour. On
other days, the WMEP p.m. peak hour trip generation will be quite similar to the
number of trips generated by the prior development on the property.
b) To what extent will the proposed redevelopment affect the intersection of Sherwood
Road, Eden Avenue, and Link Road, especially the ability of residents living to the
south to gain access to Eden Avenue and Link Road?
The WMEP Redevelopment proposal will result in practically no change
regarding the volume of traffic using Sherwood Road just south of Link
Road/Eden Avenue during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours.
The WMEP Redevelopment proposal and potential redevelopment on the north
side of Eden Avenue will increase the peak hour volumes on Link Road and
Eden Avenue through the intersection with Sherwood Road. Further analysis is
needed to address specific level of service results and whether any physical or
traffic control improvements are needed at this intersection.
e) Will the number of parking spaces included in the WMEP redevelopment plan likely
be sufficient to meet the development's needs?
The overall planned parking capacity of 340 spaces likely will be sufficient to
meet the development's needs, though a capacity condition may be experienced
during the weekday afternoon periods. To avoid potential parking space
deficiencies, we would suggest that the development plans include a proof of
parking contingency, whereby space would be available at the south end of the
Sherwood Road parking area to expand that lot in the future by about 20 spaces if
such needs arise.
Mr. William H. Beard -11- April 2, 1999
• Parking supply and demand will be reasonably balanced among the three parking
areas, provided that employees of the bus operation are encouraged to park in the
eastern parking area.
• Several issues exist regarding the parking layout, and further site plan analyses
and refinements should be accomplished during subsequent development phases
in order to effectively resolve these points.
On an overall basis, we are confident that the traffic and parking needs for the WMEP
Redevelopment proposal can be effectively met in a manner that would not cause adverse
impacts for residents to the south on Sherwood Road or for motorists presently using
Eden Avenue. In conjunction with subsequent steps in the development process,
additional traffic analyses should be performed to quantify expected levels of service, to
determine whether any roadway or traffic control improvements are needed, and, if so, to
develop a specific plan for such improvements. In addition to addressing the intersection
of Sherwood Road/Link Road/Eden Avenue, consideration also should be given to traffic
operations along Eden Avenue east of Sherwood Road. Also, further work should be
performed on the site plan in order to establish a parking layout that provides effective
ingress /egress and internal circulation.
MINNESOTA 1500 HIGHWAY 36 WEST T: (651) 582 -8200
DEPARTMENT OF ROSEVILLE, MN 551 1 3 -4266 TTY: (651) 582 -8201
http: / /cfl.state.mn.us
Child � n
Families
Lea� rning
MAR 3 Q 1999
March 26, 1999
Kenneth A. Dragseth, Ph. D.
Superintendent of Schools
Independent School District 273, Edina
5701 Normandale Road
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Superintendent Dragseth:
I am in receipt of the site drawings of the property you intend to purchase and the cost
breakout of the total property. I understand that Independent School District 273, Edina
is the fiscal agent for the West Metro Education Program Southwest School.
I approve the site described in your letter of March 12, 1999 and will authorize the
payment of $3,000,000 for the purchase of the site.
Sincerely,
Uistin ax—Ph.D.
Commissioner
The Rev. Dr. James A Siefkes
7520 Cahill Rd. Box 317
Edina, MN 55439 - 2778
April 1, 1999
Edina City Council
Attn: Gordon Hughes, City Manager
Edina City Offices
Edina, MN.
Dear friends,
As a thirty year resident of Edina and concerned citizen for our community, I write this letter in the interest and
behalf of the West Metro Education Program (WMEP). I am a retired executive of the former American Lutheran
Church and the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America. Within the past couple of years I have served in the Edina
group of the metro area Community Circles Collaborative. In this educational and research process the WMEP
has become a matter of special interest and concern and now reaches a critical point in its development Some of
the things I have learned are:
1. The WEMP is a plan that has has been in process for more than 10 years by the best minds the metro educa-
tional field has to offer.
2. Edina has been rather isolated from the reality of the real world in the larger metro area in which we are located.
We are at a time in history when such isolation often nutured by phobias, classism and/or racism, is neither wise
or possible. The insight of Edina mayor Glen Smith in a 1977 statement in "About Town" was right on target: 'The
vitality of the inner city, liveable communities, legislation, country welfare programs, traffic, commercial develop-
ment, crime, police all effect the quality of life in the whole region" .
A few facts for your information:
A. The Eisenhower foundation recent updated report on the 30th anniversary of the Kerner report restates:
"Our nation is still moving toward two socieffes -1 black/ 1 white - separate and unequal"
B. The U.S. income gap has widened to the point that 1% of Americans have more wealth than the entire
bottom 90 %.
C.The U.S. spends more per year on prisons than on higher education. Ten years ago this was the reverse.
One in three black males in the U.S. are in prison, on bail, or probation.
D. Minneapolis/St Paul rank #1 in U.S. poverty rates for people of color (44.6%). We rank 3rd when you
consider the entire metro area. In the suburbs it is 4.54 %.
E. The poverty rate for children in the twin cities has doubled in the past ten years (18% to 31%). This
includes more than 50% for African American, 66% Id for Indian, and 69% for Asian children.
Two of every three persons in the region who live below the poverty level are white. The poverty level being
$12,500 for a family of three is equivalent to $6.03 per hour for a 40 hour week.
May the above illustrate some of my concerns. As a citizen of Edina and a beneficiary of the fruits of capitalism, I
struggle with the tendency to guilt and frustration about how to balance the fruits of such benefits for more of our
brothers and sisters in this region. No "cure all" is in view. The ethnic cleansing in our culture is much more subtle
than in Kosovo. But phobias toward people who might be viewed different either by race or class we must
struggle to overcome. The value of diversity/ inclusivity for Edina students and the community — understanding,
compassion, real world, the interchange of the gifts of knowledge,culture, are extremely important.
are extremely important
I am grateful to live in a democratic society. But there is no guarantee that democracy is always fair. We live in a
capitalistic society, but capitalism puts those of us who "win" in a difficult position. The temptations to abuse
such benefits are tremendous. In addition to this to be a "winner" carries a large moral responsibility in the
distribution and sharing of those benefits.
The WMEP provides a unique opportunity for a move in the right direction.
— It is important to do it now - - we have a small window of opportunity to change the course of events.
- It will benefit Edina children — community members — provide learning opportunities for staff and citi-
zenry.
It would fit an important part of "the village" proposal — theater, gymnasium, library, senior center etc.
It promotes VOLUNTARY integration along lines of race & socio-economic status.
MOST IMPORANTLY, IT IS THE RIGHT THING TO DO 1
Urban planners have learned ( sometimes the hard way) that no community, in spite of a variety of
phobias, can build out social disintegration any more than they could build a wall high enough to keep
out environmental pollution. To act now would be in the self interest of Edina. The impacts of change
affects us all and as Edina citizens we have a role to play in shaping the future for ourselves with and for
others.
I urge you to move to approve the West Metro Education Project for the City of Edina and in behalf of ourselves,
elementary children in the region, and our neighbors in the twin cities community. It may not be a "cure all" — but
it would be an important step in the right direction. PLEASE DO IT !
Thank you for your attention.
OL . �-
James A. Siefkes
03/13/1991 21:39
612 - 924 -6141
Dear City Counc# Members,
I have been folly
weeks. When t]
confused and cc
is moving too q
been under con
that this current
considerations g
In the last coup]
criticisms are sr
former member
values diversity
proceedings.
W
ping the progress of the WMEP plans with in over the
last article came out in the Sun Current this week I started
erned. Quite frankly, I'm surprised with the riticisms the
My. If I'm not mistaken this site and various WMEP prof
leration since 1997. It is time to move ahead. It is also prey
.velopment proposal is just that -a proposal t has a lot of
I hurdles to still deal when and if the City.Co cil gives its
PAGE 02
ast few
D become
this project
Dsals have
y obvious
tops and
to ahead.
of days I started to have the alarming thought some of ese
ike screens to cover fears about the WMEP p of the pro sal. As a
f the Edina Human Relations Commission an as an Edina hizen who
i our community I ask you to not let this in an way be a p of these
Over the =uthd er situations have had the possibilities of sin
house on a Rd. and the proposed basketball court at %N
in the Southdale d. situation our City Council at the time stop
city stands for. ask you all to do the same. It is time to make
Ian Buth
4700 Sunnyside
Edina, Mn. 554:
ABC
odale Park.) Particularly
very strong for what our
>I
Y
MINNESOTA 1500 HIGHWAY 36 WEST T: (651) 582.8200
DEPARTMENT OF ROSEVILLE, MN 551 1 3-4266 TTY: )651) 582 -8201
http: / /Cfi.state.mn.us
Child n
Families��
Learning
MAR 3 0 1999
March 26, 1999
Kenneth A. Dragseth, Ph. D.
Superintendent of Schools
Independent School District 273, Edina
5701 Normandale Road
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Superintendent Dragseth:
I am in receipt of the site drawings of the property you intend to purchase and the cost
breakout of the total property. I understand that Independent School District 273, Edina
is the fiscal agent for the West Metro Education Program Southwest School.
I approve the site described in your letter of March 12, 1999 and will authorize the
payment of $3,000,000 for the purchase of the site.
Sincerely,
istin ax, Ph.D.
Commissioner
The Rev. Dr. James A Siefkes
7520 Cahill Rd. Box 317
Edina, MN 55439 - 2778
April 1, 1999
Edina City Council
Attn: Gordon Hughes, City Manager
Edina City Offices
Edina, MN.
Dear friends,
As a thirty year resident of Edina and concerned citizen for our community, I write this letter in the interest and
behalf of the West Metro Education Program (WMEP). I am a retired executive of the former American Lutheran
Church and the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America. Within the past couple of years I have served in the Edina
group of the metro area Community Circles Collaborative. In this educational and research process the WMEP
has become a matter of special interest and concern and now reaches a critical point in its development Some of
the things I have learned are:
1. The WEMP is a plan that has has been in process for more than 10 years by the best minds the metro educa-
tional field has to offer.
2. Edina has been rather isolated from the reality of the real world in the larger metro area in which we are located.
We are at a time in history when such isolation often nutured by phobias, classism and/or racism, is neither wise
or possible. The insight of Edina mayor Glen Smith in a 1977 statement in "About Town" was right on target: 'The
vitality of the inner city, liveable communities, legislation, country welfare programs, traffic, commercial develop -
ment; crime, police all effect the quality of life in the whole region" .
A few facts for your information:
A. The Eisenhower foundation recent updated report on the 30th anniversary of the Kerner report restates:
"Our nation is still moving toward two societies -1 black/ 1 white - separate and unequal"
B. The U.S. income gap has widened to the point that 1% of Americans have more wealth than the entire
bottom 90 %.
C.The U.S. spends more per year on prisons than on higher education. Ten years ago this was the reverse.
One in three black males in the U.S. are in prison, on bail, or probation.
D. Minneapolis/St Paul rank #1 in U.S. poverty rates for people of color (44.6%). We rank 3rd when you
consider the entire metro area. In the suburbs it is 4.54 %.
E. The poverty rate for children in the twin cities has doubled in the past ten years (18% to 31 %) . This
includes more than 50% for African American, 66% W for Indian; and 69% for Asian children.
Two of every three persons in the region who live below the poverty level are white. The poverty level being
$12,500 for a family of three is equivalent to $6.03 per hour for a 40 hour week.
May the above illustrate some of my concerns. As a citizen of Edina and a beneficiary of the fruits of capitalism, I
struggle with the tendency to guilt and frustration about how to balance the fruits of such benefits for more of our
brothers and sisters in this region. No "cure all" is in view. The ethnic cleansing in our culture is much more subtle
than in Kosovo. But phobias toward people who might be viewed different either by race or class we must
struggle to overcome. The value of diversity/ inclusivity for Edina students and the community — understanding,
compassion, real world, the interchange of the gifts of knowledge,culture, are extremely important.
are extremely important
I am grateful to live in a democratic society. But there is no guarantee that democracy is always fair. We live in a
capitalistic society, but capitalism puts those of us who "win" in a difficult position. The temptations to abuse
such benefits are tremendous. In addition to this to be a "winner" carries a large moral responsibility in the
distribution and sharing of those benefits.
The WMEP provides a unique opportunity for a move in the right direction.
— It is important to do it now - - we have a small window of opportunity to change the course of events.
- It will benefit Edina children — community members — provide learning opportunities for staff and citi-
zenry.
It would fit an important part of "the village" proposal = theater, gymnasium, library, senior center etc.
It promotes VOLUNTARY integration along lines of race & socio- economic status.
MOST IMPORANTLY, IT IS THE RIGHT THING TO DO I
Urban planners have learned ( sometimes the hard way) that no community, in spite of a variety of
phobias, can build out social disintegration any more than they could build a wall high enough to keep
out environmental pollution. To act now would be in the self interest of Edina. The impacts of change
affects us all and as Edina citizens we have a role to play in shaping the future for ourselves with and for
others.
I urge you to move to approve the West Metro Education Project for the City of Edina and in behalf of ourselves,
elementary children in the region, and our neighbors in the twin cities community. It may.not be a "cure all" — but
it would be an important step in the right direction. PLEASE DO IT I
Thank you for your attention. o
James A. Siefkes
03/13/1991 21:39 612 - 924 -6141 0: PAGE 02
Dear City Counc o Members,
I have been folly
weeks. When tl
confused and cc
is moving too q
been under con
that this current
considerations s
ring the progress of the WMEP plans with int
est over the
ast few
last article came out in the Sun Current this
I started
become
*rned. Quite frankly, I'm surprised with the
riticisms th
this project
My. If I'm not mistaken this site and various
WMEP pro
sals have
leration since 1997. It is time to move aheattchil
is also pr
obvious
welopment proposal is just that -a proposaas
a lot of
eps and
{ hurdles to still deal when and if the City.
gives its
o ahead.
In the last coupli i of days I started to have the alarming thought
criticisms are srr oke screens to cover fears about the WMEP pa
former memberof the Edina Human Relations Commission an(
values diversity n our community I ask you to not let this in an
proceedings.
Over the years Jer situations have had the possibilities of sim
house on Southa Rd. and the proposed basketball court at W in the Southdald. situation our City Council at the time stoo
city stands for. sk you all to do the same. It is time to make
Tan Buth
4700 Sunnyside
Edina, Mn. 554;
bat some of
ese
t of the pro
sal. As a
as an Edina
itizen who
way be a p
of these
(the ABC
odale Park.) Particularly
very strong Tor what our
COUNCIL
CHL REGISTER
31 -MAR -1999 k -o:52) page 1
CHECK NO
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT PO NUM
13419
04/05/99
$785.08
BRW INC.
Arch fees
26706502
CENTENNIAL
LAK PRO FEE ARCH /E
04/05/99
$11,483.88
BRW INC.
Arch fees
26706503
CENTENNIAL
LAK PRO FEE ARCH /E
< *>
$12,268.96*
13420
04/05/99
$174.78
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTUR
Env test
71772
GRANDVIEW
MISC
< *>
$174.78*
13421
04/05/99
$2,220.00
Ehlers & Associates Inc
Grandview consulting
15918
GRANDVIEW
PROFESSIONAL S
< *>
$2,220.00*
13422
04/05/99
$3,565.00
GARDENSIDE LTD
Tables for south park
5119
CENTENNIAL
LAK PARKS 546
< *>
$3,565.00*
13423
04/05/99
$63,163.82
UNITED PROPERTIES
TIF rebate
032999
CENTENNIAL
LAK MISC
< *>
$63,163.82*
•
$81,392.56*
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
HELD AT CITY HALL
MARCH 15,1999 - 7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Faust, Hovland, Maetzold, and Mayor Smith.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Maetzold and
seconded by Member Faust approving the Council Consent Agenda as presented.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Maetzold, Smith
Motion carried.
PROCLAMATION OF MARCH 18 1999 AS "ABSOLUTELY INCREDIBLE KIDS DAY"
AND PRESENTATION BY EDINA CAMP FIRE GIRLS AND BOYS Six Edina Camp Fire
Boys and Girls presented a cake to the Mayor and City Council commemorating the 89th
Birthday of Camp Fire Boys and Girls. Mayor Smith thanked the Camp Fire Boys and Girls
and their leader, Connie Erickson. He commended the group for their efforts and
contributions to the community. Member Hovland made a motion adopting a proclamation
declaring March 18, 1999, "Absolutely Incredible Kids Day in Edina ", encouraging all
Edina adults to write a letter to a child encouraging and praising them, and commending
Camp Fire for its commitment to youth. Member Faust seconded the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Maetzold, Smith
Resolution adopted.
1999 GIRLS ALPINE SKI TEAM CHAMPIONS COMMENDED Mayor Smith commended
the 1999 Edina Girls Alpine Ski Team who won the Classic Lake Conference, Section 6AA
Champions and State Championship. Resolutions of commendation were presented to each
team member as ambassadors of the City of Edina representing the highest standards of
athletic proficiency and good sportsmanship. Member Maetzold made a motion adopting
the resolution commending the 1999 Girls Alpine Ski Team Champions on their Classic
Lake Conference, Section 6AA Championship, and State Championship. Member Hovland
seconded the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Maetzold, Smith
Resolution adopted.
1999 BOYS ALPINE SKI TEAM CHAMPIONS COMMENDED Mayor Smith commended
the 1999 Edina Boys Alpine Ski Team who won the Classic Lake Conference and State
Championship. Resolutions of commendation were presented to each team member as
ambassadors of the City of Edina representing the highest standards of athletic proficiency
and good sportsmanship. Member Maetzold made a motion adopting the resolution
commending the 1999 Boys Alpine Ski Team Champions on their Classic Lake Conference
and State Championships. Member Faust seconded the motion.
Page 1
Minutes/Edina City Council/March 15,1999
Rollcall:
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Maetzold, Smith
Resolution adopted.
*MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 1 1999 APPROVED Motion
made by Member Maetzold and seconded by Member Faust approving the Minutes of the
Regular Meeting of March 1, 1999.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Maetzold, Smith
Motion carried.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPROVED - OUR LADY OF GRACE CHURCH (5071
EDEN AVENUE) Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file.
Manager Hughes explained that an error had been discovered in the survey submitted by
Our Lady of Grace necessitating Council consider the conditional use permit as it will exist
with the corrected survey.
Planner Larsen stated the error was originally pointed out by a resident expressing concern
with the property line. The resident was concerned about landscaping and fencing. Planner
Larsen added that correcting the property line error meant a ten -foot northerly adjustment of
the property line; making the addition's proposed setback, 46 feet of the 50 feet required by
Edina's code. Thus, a four -foot building setback variance. is required. He noted letters
received from Richard Brownlee, project architect and Jeffrey D. Smith, project manager
addressing the error on the plans and their request for the setback variance. Their request is
for approval of the permit with no changes from the original plan.
Planner Larsen concluded, stating that notice of the hearing was published in the Edina Sun
Current and notices mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the property just the
same as for the original hearing.
Jeff Smith, Opus, representing Our Lady of Grace,requested Council consider granting the
variance and approving the conditional use permit based upon the original plan. He
explained the design optimizes the additions connection to the existing structure and would
not result in any further encroachment. Mayor Smith asked how close the existing structure
comes to the property line. Jeff Smith replied the existing building comes within 33 feet of
the property line at its closest point.
Member Maetzold asked if the original church was granted a variance. Planner Larsen
explained the current standards were not in existence when the original building was built,
so no variance was needed at that time.
Member Faust asked if the neighbors have been notified and if any complaints were received.
Planner Larsen replied that all property owners within 500 feet have been notified and no
complaints have been received.
Page 2
I
Minutes/Edina Ci!y Council/March 15,1999
Member Hovland asked if the church had indicated what the effect would be if the variance
were not granted. Jeff Smith explained that it would be very difficult to redesign the
addition to make the proper connection to the existing building without the variance. Mr.
Smith added that the church hopes to have the addition completed .in time for Fall 1999
classes. He stated the structural steel has been ordered to meet the fall deadline.
Mayor Smith called for public comment. No one appeared.
Jeff Smith introduced Father Robert Valit, Our Lady of Grace's Pastor,- and Paul Smith,
Church Administrator. The gentlemen apologized for the error and requested approval of
the variance and conditional use permit. Mayor Smith asked the church representatives to
make sure they heard the previously stated neighbors' concerns -- bus stacking adjacent to
Richmond Drive.
Mayor Smith introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that the four -foot setback variance and
Conditional Use Permit for Our Lady of Grace Church, 5071 Eden Avenue be and is hereby
granted conditioned upon the Church obtaining the necessary watershed district permits.
Member Hovland seconded the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Maetzold, Smith
Resolution adopted.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPROVED - CORNELIA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 7000
CORNELIA DRIVE Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on
file.
Planner Larsen informed the Council that the Edina School District has submitted plans
requesting to add classroom space to Cornelia Elementary School. Four additional
classrooms are proposed - -three added to space within the inner courtyard area, and the
fourth to the northwest corner of the building.
Planner Larsen stated Cornelia School now provides parking for 149 vehicles. According to
calculations, the school, including proposed new classrooms, requires 142 spaces based upon
the seating capacity of the gymnasium. He explained that the proposed addition will
provide needed classroom space with minimal impact on the existing school and grounds.
The addition will not impact activities in Cornelia Park that is located adjacent to school
grounds.
Planner Larsen reported that the Planning Commission recommended approval of the
Conditional Use Permit.
Page 3
Minutes/Edina City Council/March 15,1999
Member Faust asked how the parking demand is calculated. Planner Larsen explained that
parking demand is calculated either by classrooms; or by the square footage of the
gymnasium divided by three, whichever is higher.
Jay Peirsol, KKE Architects, informed the Council the School District -hopes to have the
addition open by August 15, 1999. He added the School District has also already ordered
structural steel because of the tight timeline for construction.
Member Faust asked how many students the four additional classrooms will generate. Mr.
Peirsol replied there will be 27 additional students. He explained that although four
additional classrooms will be built they will be used to redistribute students currently housed
in other building spaces.
Mayor Smith asked what the average square footage will be of each proposed additional
classroom. Mr. Peirsol replied they are each approximately 900 square feet.
Council Action
Member Maetzold introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that the Conditional Use Permit for
Independent School District 273's Cornelia Elementary School, 7000 Cornelia Drive be and
is hereby granted a conditional use permit upon the District obtaining the necessary
watershed district permits.
Member Faust seconded the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Maetzold, Smith
Resolution adopted.
FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVED - NORTHWEST ATHLETIC CLUB, 7300
BUSH LAKE ROAD Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and. ordered placed on
file.
Planner Larsen informed the Council the subject property is zoned Planned Industrial
District (PID), and developed with a tennis facility providing seven indoor and three outdoor
courts. The property is located near the northerly end of Bush Lake Road and is bounded on
the west by railroad- tracks. The proposed redevelopment would raze all existing
improvements, including, parking area and drive aisles.
Planner Larsen stated the redevelopment proposes ten indoor tennis courts supported by a
commons area that would contain a lounge, pro shop, and locker rooms. The plan would
replace the existing metal structures with two air - supported domes. The commons would be
finished with stucco. Air - supported Teflon domes are not a permitted exterior material in
the PID district; therefore, Northwest would need a variance to allow the proposed
structures.
Page 4
r
Minutes/Edina City Council/March 15,1999
Planner Larsen noted the redevelopment meets Edina's code requirement for parking. The
site provides 83 spaces, and 79 would be required by code (1 space per 200 feet accessory
area). The plan meets or exceeds required building setbacks for front, side and rear yard lot
lines. Planner Larsen said the redevelopment would represent a significant improvement
over the present facility with little negative impact on adjoining properties. He reported the
Planning Commission recommended Council approve Final Development Plans subject to
watershed district permits.
Jerry Runk, KMR Architects, Jerry Noyce and David Cochrin were present representing
Northwest Athletic Clubs.
Mayor Smith asked what view the neighbor to the west will see. Jerry Runk, KMR,
Architects, replied that because of the site's slope they should see very little if anything of the
finished domes.
Member Faust asked if the redeveloped club would be the same size, if the climate control
has improved, and when the club was proposed to be completed. Mr. Runk answered that
the proposed redevelopment is smaller but a more efficient use of the space; and that in fact
climate control has improved and that Northwest hopes to be finished with construction in
late September.
Member Hovland asked what would be the composition and color of the proposed bubbles.
Mr. Runk replied they were a cream colored acrylic top coated vinyl polyester.
Member Maetzold introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that that the Final Development plan dated
February 10, 1999 for Northwest Athletic Clubs on 7300 Bush Lake Road presented at the
regular meeting of the City Council on March 15, 1999, be and is hereby approved
conditioned upon the Northwest Athletic Club obtaining the necessary watershed district
permits.
Member Faust seconded the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Maetzold, Smith
Resolution adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 1999-7 ADOPTED AMENDING SECTION 1230.07 SIDEWALK CAFES
AND SECTION 900.09 SEATING CAPACITY OF INTOXICATING LIQUOR
ESTABLISHMENTS IN PCD -2 DISTRICTS Manager Hughes explained that following
adoption of the new liquor ordinance March 1, 1999, two issues have arisen that may affect
the license application of Tejas, a current wine licensee. The first issue relates to Subsection
1230.07 of the City Code that regulates sidewalk cafes. The subsection allows the
consumption of alcoholic beverages at sidewalk cafes, but limits consumption to beer and
wine. Manager Hughes stated that Subsection 1230.07 should be amended if Council wishes
Page 5
Minutes/Edina City Council/March 15,1999
to permit consumption of intoxicating liquor in sidewalk cafes. Tejas is the only Edina
restaurant maintaining a sidewalk cafe
Manager Hughes informed the Council the second issue relates to Tejas' seating capacity.
Staff recommended and the Council adopted a provision in the liquor ordinance limiting
seating capacity in licensed premises in the , PCD -2 district (i.e., 50th and France and
Grandview) to 150 seats. The standard was recommended to prohibit large restaurants that
could potentially adversely affect available parking capacities of these commercial districts.
He added it was. staff's intent to accommodate existing restaurants as to their eligibility for
on -sale intoxicating liquor licenses. Staff's information at the time indicated the largest
restaurant (Tejas) contained 140 seats. However, following adoption of the liquor ordinance
staff was advised that Tejas' seating count did not include a lower level dining room reserved
for private parties. If the downstairs space is included, Tejas' total seating capacity would be
approximately 218 seats.
Manager Hughes outlined potential alternatives the Council could utilize if they wished to
accommodate Tejas' situation: the 150 seat limit, could be eliminated; the limit could be
increased; the ordinance could distinguish private dining areas from public areas for the
purpose of determining compliance with the seating limit; or existing restaurants could be
grandfathered.
Manager Hughes noted that staff recommended amending the. ordinance with a
"grandfather" provision. He added that if the Council wished to. limit Tejas' use of their'
lower level dining room to private parties, special conditions could be added to their on -sale
license. Suggested provisions would include: private party use only - no permanent table set
up; no permanent bar allowed in the lower level; and seating .capacity of the lower level
cannot be included when Tejas' calculates their 15% bar seating.
Member Faust stated she thought there were other sidewalk cafes in Edina. Manager
Hughes explained that according to the Code's definition, the cafe must be on a city
sidewalk, not just an outside dining area.
Mayor Smith asked for. clarification of who owns the "sidewalk" where a cafe would be
located. Manager Hughes said that the sidewalk would be considered a City right -of -way.
Mayor Smith stated that with the. ability to operate a. sidewalk cafe, there must be. some
heightened rule to regulate the sale and service of liquor. He asked Tejas' owner, Wayne
Kostroski, how he intended to regulate the service of intoxicating liquor in his sidewalk cafe.
Mr. Kostroski replied that there is a fence that provides a barrier between diners and the
general public.. He added that Tejas has not experienced a problem in serving wine and beer
in the outdoor location; and that he did not anticipate any difference with serving
intoxicating liquor. Mr. Kostroski explained that his staff is trained to patrol the area, and to
his knowledge they have not had any incidents resulting from wine or beer service in the cafe
area.
Page 6
Minutes/Edina City Council/March 15,1999
Member Hovland stated he would favor amending the ordinance to deal with these issues.
Member Maetzold agreed with Member Hovland.
Mayor Smith asked if the amendments were approved, could other restaurants operate
sidewalk cafes. Attorney Gilligan replied that other entities could apply for a "Sidewalk
Cafe" permit under our Code.
Member Hovland moved first reading and waiver of second reading of Ordinance No.
1999 -7 as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 1999-7
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING EDINA
CODE SECTIONS 1230.07 AND 900.09
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS:
Section 1. Subsection 1230.07 Subd. 2 Paragraph B. 2. of the Edina Code of
Ordinances is hereby amended to read as follows:
"2. Intoxicating liquors, beer or wine may be consumed only if the sidewalk cafe
is licensed pursuant to Section 900 of this Code."
Section 2. Subd. 5 of Subsection 900.09 of the City Code is amended to read as
follows:
"Subd. 5 On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor Licenses. In addition to the requirements of
Subd.1 of this Subsection, no On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License shall be granted
to i) any establishment other than a restaurant or hotel located in the PCD -2, PCD -3
Subdistricts or the Mixed Development District as established by Section 850 of this
Code; ii) any amusement or recreation establishment including amusement arcades,
bowling centers, pool halls or establishments offering amusement devices as
defined by Section 215 of this Code, or iii) any establishment located in a building
which also contains any dwelling units as defined by Section 850 of this Code. In
addition, no On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License shall be granted to any
establishment located in the PCD -2 Subdistrict which will contain more than 150
seats; provided, however, a premises in the PCD -2 Subdistrict holding a wine
license issued by the City which was in effect on December 31, 1998, and which
contains more that 150 seats may be issued an On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License
but the licensed premises shall not be thereafter expanded to include more seats
than existed on December 31,1998."
Section 3. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon passage and
publication.
First Reading: March 15,1999
Second Reading: Waived
Published in the Edina Sun Current: March 24,1999
Attest
City Clerk
Member Hovland seconded the motion.
Rollcall:
Page 7
Mayor
Minutes/Edina City Counci]/March 15,1999
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Maetzold, Smith
Ordinance adopted.
*BID AWARDED FOR FERTILIZER FOR BRAEMAR AND FRED RICHARDS GOLF
COURSES Motion made by Member Maetzold and seconded by Member Faust for award
of bid for fertilizer for Braemar and Fred Richards Golf Courses to recommended low
bidder North Star Turf Supply under Hennepin County Cooperative Purchasing Contract
#4623A8 at $21,943.26.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
*BID CONTINUED TO APRIL 5 1999 FOR PARK DEPARTMENT ARTICULATING
LOADER Motion made by Member Maetzold and seconded by Member Faust continuing
the bid for an articulating loader for the Park Department to April 5, 1999.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
*BID REJECTED FOR 1999 4 -WHEEL DRIVE HYDRAULIC ROTARY MOWER,
BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE Motion made by Member Maetzold and seconded by
Member Faust rejecting the bid for a 1999 4 -wheel drive hydraulic rotary mower for
Braemar Golf Course.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
*AWARD OF BID FOR COMMODITIES PURCHASE (PUBLIC WORKS) Member
Maetzold made a motion for award of bid for sand, rock, bituminous materials, concrete,
propane and engine oil to recommended low bidders as follows: Concrete Sand
(delivered) to SA -AG at $4.35 per ton; Course Sand (delivered) (Metro Seal) to SA -AG at
$5.70 per ton; C1.2 Limestone (delivered) to Bryan Rock Products at $8.07 per ton; FA -3 Seal
Coat Chips (delivered) to Dresser Trap Rock at $20.15 per ton; Asphalt 2331 (Base Type 31
or 32) (picked up at plant) to Bituminous Roadways* (vendor 1) at $18.00 per ton or C.S.
McCrossan (alternate) at $17.90 per ton; Asphalt 2331 (Base Type 31 or 32) (delivered) to
Bituminous Roadways at $22.00 per ton, Asphalt 2331 (Type 41A & 42) Wear (picked up) to
Bituminous Roadways* at $18.75 per ton or C.S. McCrossan (alternate) at $19.75 per ton;
Asphalt 2331 (type 41B and 42B) (delivered) to Bituminous Roadways at $22.25 per ton,
Asphalt 2331 (Wear (type 31/32) (picked up) to Bituminous Roadways* (vendor 1) at $18.75
per ton or C.S. McCrossan (vendor 2) at $18.50 per ton; 233131/32 Asphalt Wear (delivered)
to Bituminous Roadways at $22.75 per ton; Concrete 3+ yards (delivered) to CAMAS, Inc. -
Model Ready Mix at $66.48 per cubic yard; Emulisified Asphalt CRS2 to Koch at $0.5734
per gallon; Emulisified Tack Oil * ** to Koch Materials at $0.6702 per gallon; Engine Oil
15/40 to Hallman Oil at $2.79 per gallon, Engine Oil 5W30 to Hallman Oil at $2.79 per
gallon; Rubberized Crack Filler to Construction Materials at $0.279 per gallon, Red Ball
Aggregate to Byran Rock at $11.32 per ton, Lannon Stone Wall Repair to Bjork Stone at
$8.00 at S.F.; Manhole Covers to Ess Brothers at $73.80 each; Hydrofluosilic Acid & Liquid
Chlorine to Dixie Petro Chemical at $41.03 per CWT; Caustic Soda to Hawkins Chemical at
$25.00 per CWT. ( *These bids are awarded on basis of total cost per ton including trucking
and labor).Member Faust seconded the motion.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
Page 8
1
Minutes/Edina City Council/March 15,1999
*BID AWARDED FOR FAIRWAY MOWER FOR BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE Motion
made by Member Maetzold and seconded by Member Faust for award of bid for 3- Wheel
Drive 90" Fairway Mower for Braemar Golf Course to recommended low bidder MTI
Distributing Company at $15,630.00.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
*INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM GREATER MINNEAPOLIS DAY CARE
ASSOCIATION REGARDING THE 1999 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK
GRANT Motion made by Member Maetzold and seconded by Member Faust to receive the
Laurie Possin's letter from the Greater Minneapolis Day Care Association addressing
Council's questions raised regarding the numbers of Edina Families served by Community
Development Block Grant Funds.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
*VINCENT COCKRIEL APPOINTED ASSISTANT WEED INSPECTOR Motion made by
Member Maetzold and seconded by Member Faust appointing Vincent Cockriel the City's
Assistant Weed Inspector.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
APRIL 5, 1999 HEARING DATE SET FOR ON -SALE INTOXICATING LIQUOR
LICENSES CONSIDERATION Following a brief discussion Member Hovland made a
motion setting a date of April 5, 1999 for the public hearing to consider the applications of
the on -sale liquor license applicants. Member Maetzold seconded the motion.
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Maetzold, Smith
Motion carried
*RESOLUTION ADOPTED AMENDING SOUTHWEST MUTUAL AID AGREEMENT
Member Maetzold made a motion that was seconded by Member Faust introducing the
following resolution:
RESOLUTION
AMENDING SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN
MUTUAL AID ASSOCIATION
WHEREAS, the City of Edina has previously approved and participated in a mutual aid
agreement between the southwest suburban governmental agencies to provide cooperative
use of fire personnel and equipment, and
WHEREAS, the agencies participating in this agreement have been designated the
Southwest Mutual Aid Association, and
WHEREAS, the existing agreement requires the parties of the agreement to approve by
resolution a new "Exhibit A" adding new members or deleting existing members; and
WHEREAS, the City of Maple Grove would like to join the Association and would add to
the overall effectiveness; and
WHEREAS, the Veterans Administration Medical Center has disbanded their fire
department and has requested removal from the Association.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Edina,
Minnesota, that:
Page 9
Minutes/Edina City Council/March 15,1999
the revised "Exhibit A" dated, 2,/1/99, which included the City of Maple Grove and
deletes the Veterans Administration Medical Center is hereby approved as the
official list of parties to the agreement establishing the Southwest Suburban Mutual
Aid Association.
BE, IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is directed to transmit a certified
copy of this resolution to the secretary of the Southwest Mutual Aid Association.
Adopted this 15th day of March, 1999..
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
TEMPORARY ON SALE LIQUOR LICENSE AWARDED FOR APRIL IN PARIS (EDINA
FOUNDATION BALL), APRIL 17,1999 Manager Hughes reminded Council that Minnesota
Statute 340A allows charitable organizations to obtain a temporary on -sale intoxicating liquor
license. City Code 900 further restricts issuance of temporary on -sale licenses to the Edina
Foundation for the purpose of their EDINAMITE fund raising event. Beginning in 1983 and
continuing through 1990, annually the Edina Foundation obtained a temporary on -sale liquor
license. The temporary license allowed the Foundation to serve intoxicating liquor under the
license of Interlachen Country Club at the EDINAMITE. The City 'waived any fee for this
temporary license. The Foundation resumed their annual fundraising tradition last year. This
year's event "April in Paris" is scheduled April 1999, at Edinborough Park
Member Faust made a motion approving the temporary On -Sale Liquor License to the
Edina Foundation for the April in Paris event scheduled April 17, 1999, at Edinborough
Park. Mayor Smith seconded the motion.
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Maetzold, Smith
Motion carried.
CLAIMS PAID Motion made by Member Faust approving payment of the following
claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated March 10, 1999, and consisting of 32
pages: General Fund $244,070.87, Communications. $1,505.00; Working Capital $12,403.76;
Art Center $10,676.62, Golf Dome Fund $7,178.55; Swimming Pool Fund $1,016.24; Golf
Course Fund $74,850.18; Ice Arena Fund $60,573.93; Edinborough/Centennial Lakes
$31,185.54; Utility Fund $46,500.91; Storm Sewer Utility Fund $4,950.39; Recycling Program
$35,151.44, Liquor Dispensary Fund $218,577.65; Construction Fund $27,117.19; Park Bond
Fund $220.00; TOTAL $775,978.27 and for confirmation of payment of the following claims
as shown in detail on the check Register dated March 4, 1999 and consisting of four pages:
General Fund $253,866.20; Communications $4,572.71; Art Center $462.52; Golf Course
Fund $207.26; Edinborough/Centennial Lakes $300.00; Utility Fund $223.56; Liquor
Dispensary Funds $59,64387, TOTAL $319,276.12. Member Maetzold seconded the motion.
Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Maetzold, Smith Motion carried.
There being no further business on the Council: Agenda, Mayor Smith adjourned the Council
Meeting at 9:35 P.M.
Page 10
t
o e
Jess
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Gordon Hughes
City Manager
Date: April 5, 1999
Subject: Public Hearings on
Issuance of
On -Sale Intoxicating
Liquor Licenses
Recommendation:
Agenda Item #
Consent
Information Only
Mgr. Recommends
Action
III. A. -H.
❑ To H RA
® To Council
® Motion
❑ Resolution
❑ Ordinance
❑ Discussion
Issue on -sale intoxicating liquor licenses to:
• Argento, Inc. d.b.a. Two Guys from Italy(conditioned upon completion of
remodeling and final) inspection by Health Department.)
• Big Bowl, Inc. d.b.a. Big Bowl Cafe
• Chili's of Minnesota, Inc. d.b.a. Romano's Macaroni Grill
• Cuisine Concepts LLC d.b.a. Tejas Restaurant
• Sidney's of Edina. Inc. d.b.a. Sidney's (conditioned upon completion of
remodeling and final inspection by Health Department.)
VIP Restaurant Inc, d.b.a. Ciatti's
Continue public hearings to April 19, 1999, with respect to
• Pantry Restaurant, Inc. d.b.a. Eden Avenue Grill
• RT Minneapolis Franchise LLC d.b.a. Ruby Tuesday
Info /Background:
On April 5, 1999; the Council is scheduled to conduct public hearings with respect to
the applications for on -sale intoxicating liquor licenses which were received from
restaurants presently holding wine licenses. Eight such applications were received.
These applications have been reviewed by the Police Department, Health Department
and Planning Department. Reports from these departments are attached.
Report/Recommendation
April 5, 1999
Page Two
Staff recommends the issuance of licenses to Big Bowl Care, Romano's Macaroni Grill
and Ciatti's. Staff also recommends approval for Two Guys from Italy and Sidney's.
However, the actual issuance of the license should be conditioned upon the completion
of remodeling to accommodate the storage and service of liquor. (Acceptable plans for
such remodeling have been submitted an&approved.) Staff also recommends
issuance of a license to Tejas conditioned on: 1) the lower level of the restaurant must
be used for private parties only —no permanent table set -up; 2) no permanent bar may
be constructed in the lower level: and 3) the seating capacity of the lower level cannot
be included when calculating the 15% bar seating limitation.
Staff recommends continuance of the hearings for Eden Avenue Grill and Ruby
Tuesday pending receipt of plans for remodeling to accommodate the storage and
service of liquor. We anticipate receipt of such plans prior to the April 19, 1999,
meeting.
I
MEMORANDUM
To: Gordon Hughes, City Manager
From: David Velde, Edina Health Department
Date: April 1, 1999
Subject: Liquor License Reviews
I recommend approval and issuance of the Liquor License for the following applicants:
Big Bowl, Inc., d.b.a. Big Bowl Cafe
Chili's of Minnesota, Inc. d.b.a. Romano's Macaroni Grill
Cuisine Concepts LLC, d.b.a. Tejas Restaurant
VIP Restaurant, Inc. d.b.a. Ciatti's
I recommend approval and issuance of the Liquor License for the following applicants
contingent upon the completion of their remodeling and final inspection by the Health
Department:
Argento, Inc. d.b.a. Two Guys From Italy
Sidney's of Edina, Inc. d.b.a. Sidney's
I recommend holding over the following Liquor License applicants to April 19, 1999
pending submission of plans addressing the need for adequate space for the storage,
preparation and handling or service of food and liquor:
Pantry Restaurant, Inc. d.b.a. Eden Avenue Grill
R T Minneapolis Franchise LLC d.b.a. Ruby Tuesday
The two applicants being held over to April 19, 1999 have been notified of our
recommendation in writing and by telephone.
Memo
To: Gordon Hughes
From: Craig Larser��,
Date: April 1, 1999
Re: Review of Applications for On -sale Intoxicating Liquor Licenses relative to
location and. seating capacity
Th Planning Department has reviewed the applications listed below. All properties
are zoned appropriately, none is within 300 feet of a school or place of worship, and
all conform to the restriction on number of seats.
Applications reviewed
Two Guys From Italy
Big Bowl Cafe
Romano's Macaroni Grill
Tejas Restaurant
Sidney's
Ciatti's
• Page 1
A, EDINA POLICE DEPARTMENT
w �
o e v INVESTIGATIVE REPORT
Cn
o
��v �y ON SALE LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATION
\�CORf'ORP`K"
I8B0
Date of Application:
March 16, 1999
License Facility Name:
Two Guys from Italy
Location:
7495 France Ave. S.
Type of Ownership:
Corporation (Argento Inc)
Applicant Name:
Daniel Angel Sarno
Managing Officer:
Daniel Angel Sarno
Partners (Partnership):
NA
Officers, Directors,
Shareholders > 5% (Corporation):
Daniel Angel Sarno
Source of Funds:
Business loan from Cherokee State Bank of St. Paul
Currently Held Liquor Licenses:
None
Issue Date of Wine License:
March J. 1991
Wine License Violations/Past 24 mos:
None
Seating Capacity (% of Bar Seating):
235/25 =9%
Number of Liquor Managers
Licensed:
4
77
MA V—V1
W1-
-ONM..
CATIONS
Resources Accessed:
Criminal histories:
National (NCIC)
Minnesota (BCA)
Edina P.D.
Hennepin County:
Jail Records
Warrants
Civil Filings
Woodbury P.D.
State of Minnesota:
Dept of Revenue
Secretary of State
Liquor Control Board
Person Backgrounded:
Daniel Angel Sarno
Two guys from Italy is owned and operated by Argento Inc. Argento Inc. is a Minnesota
Corporation in good standing. Daniel A. Sarno is the Corporate president and the manager of
Two Guys from Italy. Two Guys from Italy has had a Wine license in Edina since 1991. The
restaurant has had no liquor related calls for service in it's history and is operated in an
exemplary manner.
The investigation of the application of Two Guys from Italy for an on sale liquor license was
completed on 040199. No information was received which would disqualify the corporation or
any of the principals from receiving a liquor license.
'w91�11�
owed
loy
as
EDINA POLICE DEPARTMENT
INVESTIGATIVE REPORT
BUSINESS INVESTIGATION
Date of Application:
March 15, 1999
License Facility Name:
Big Bowl Cafe
Location:
3669 Galleria
Type of Ownership:
Corporate Officers & Shareholders
Applicant Name:
Susan J. Vibert
Managing Officer:
Andrew B. Gass
Partners (Partnership):
N/A
Officers, Directors,
Shareholders > 5% (Corporation):
Kevin Justin Brown
Stephen Keith Ottmann
Charles Leonard Haskell
Richard Allen Melman
Howard Michael Katz
Source of Funds:
50% Lettuce Entertain You Enterprises, Inc.
50% Brinker International, Inc.
Currently Held Liquor Licenses:
Lettuce Entertain You Enterprises, Inc. is licensed in
AZ, IL, and MN (Bloomington)
Brinker International is licensed in three foreign
continents and 31 U.S. states
Issue Date of Wine License:
July 17, 1998
Wine License Violations/Past 24 mo:
None
Seating Capacity (% of Bar Seating):
195/13 =7%
Number of Liquor Managers
Licensed:
Five
PERSONAL BACKGROUND INVESTIGATIONS
Resources Accessed:
Persons Backgrounded:
Criminal Histories:
Kevin J. Brown
- National (NCIC)
Charles L. Haskell
- Minnesota (MINCIS)
Stephen K. Ottmann
-Edina PD
Richard A. Melman
Howard M. Katz
Illinois:
Andrew B. Gass
- Kenilworth PD (Brown)
-Long Grove PD ( Ottmann)
- Chicago PD ( Haskel)
- Winnetka PD ( Melman, Katz)
- Liquor Control Division
Minnesota:
- Department of Public Safety -
Liquor and Gambling Enforcement
- Secretary of State
- Department of Revenue
Hennepin County:
- Warrants
-Civil Filings
-Jail Records
FINDINGS
Big Bowl Cafe is owned in part and operated by Lettuce Entertain You Enterprises, Inc. Of
Chicago, IL, and is owned in part by Brinker International of Dallas, TX. Lettuce Entertain
You, Inc., of which Big Bowl, Inc. is an affiliated corporation, is a privately held company,
and Big Bowl, Inc. is registered and in good standing with the States of Minnesota and
Illinois. Brinker International is a publicly traded company (NYSE) owns or has interest in
over 700 restaurants, including Romano's Macaroni Grill in Edina.
SUMMARY
The investigation of the application made by Big Bowl Cafe for an on sale liquor license was
completed on March 31, 1999. No information was found which would disqualify the
comoration or any of the principals from being granted a liquor license.
O
\Y
_t A
Date of Application:
License Facility Name:
Location:
EDINA POLICE DEPARTMENT
INVESTIGATIVE REPORT
ON SALE LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATION
March 15, 1999
Romano's Macaroni Grill
7651 France Ave.
Type of Ownership: Corporation- Chili's of Minnesota
Applicant Name: Jay L. Tobin
Managing Officer: Glenn A. Hurley
Partners (Partnership): NA
Officers, Directors, Roger F. Thomson
Shareholders > 5% (Corporation): Jay L. Tobin
Charles M Sonsteby
Barbara L. Mahoney
II Source of Funds:
Currently Held Liquor Licenses:
Issue date of Wine license
Wine License Violations/Past 24 mo
Seating Capacity (% of Bar Seating)
100% Chili's of Minnesota, Incorporated
Burnsville, Minnetonka, Roseville, Bloomington,
Brooklyn Park, Maplewood, St. Louis Park,
Plymouth, Eagan
January 1, 1999
1- Sign Violation Winter 1999
298/42 =14%
Number of Liquor Managers Licensed: I Six
Resources Accessed:
Criminal Histories:
National (NCIC)
Minnesota (BCA)
Edina P. D.
Texas: Dallas P. D. (Thomson)
(Tobin)
Mesquite P. D. ( Sonsteby)
Carrollton P. D. (Mahoney)
Liquor Control Board
Local licensing bureau
Eden Prairie P.D. (Hurley)
Hennepin County:
Jail Records
Warrants
Civil Filings
State of Minnesota:
Dept. of Revenue
Secretary of State
Liquor Control Board
Persons Backgrounded:
Roger F. Thomson
Jay L. Tobin
Charles M. Sonsteby
Barbara L. Mahoney
Glenn Andrew Hurley
Romano's Macaroni Grill is owned and operated by Chili's of Minnesota. Chili's of Minnesota,
Incorporated is owned by Brinker International Incorporated of Dallas Texas. Brinker
International is a publicly traded company (NYSE) that currently owns or controls over 700
restaurants under the following names; Chili's On The Border, Romano's Macaroni Grill,
Nlaggiano's Little Italy, Corner Bakery, Cozymel's, Eatzi's, Wildfire, and Big Bowl.
Chili's of Minnesota Inc: is a Minnesota Corporation under charter #6G -404, and is in good
,tandine with the Minnesota Secretary of State
The investigation of the application of Romano's Macaroni Grill for an on sale liquor license
was completed on 033199. No information was received which would disqualify the
cornoration or any of the principals from receiving a liquor license.
EDINA POLICE DEPARTMENT
INVESTIGATIVE REPORT
ON SALE LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATION
..: . .........................::.::: ...� ..... ................... t......::::::::......................................................................... ..........r::::::::.:frr.....t,
•:. {•::: m::::::: r:. -: •:::.:...vv.v.... •' i�{•: i4: �`}}:: t} ::ih }'f. {ttrhv } }:• } {:l:r. {•::.: } \;:;
:..x ^x:::::::: v; •}:: }:.`,. } }: >.•}:{. } } } }: ^:•: !�;��r t .k.:.wv;,vnv,..x::.v v:}:::: v:: nnx.}
:.\. ti... vv.... v, ..::}.v:: } ::::::::::::::::::fv: }..:::::::::::.} } }: ?4;. vv. t:.: {•v� {:v:n vn :: v..:::: •.: ^::.i:...::..
v.. •�:nv.v.;•':K {. }':.vrv}:::v.vr: :•. }:4 } } }:vn. :•• :. -. ': :. ��//yy
::•}•.: n.}' f:.:. jy'/+1 =�:'j�..::7:E;1:'� ':>.�� "•. �� {.:
n::. :...tt.: •..::.v... +L4L ::.:}'{t.l.:.... .nw.........lu','.,.•{...
' v... vv......}..:•: 4} ;•:ti•}:•nk.m }:4:• }x }:•:��5�.'N: )��„i!•„����,.�'•i ....
....... . . . .. :.. . .... . .. . .. ..:. uv.... ..v............................ ::... ..............t... v...vw: nvtirri{t. s'•\ 'l ... r..
..v . . ..v \. \ \.....vv n....v n.:. .:. .... ....................... ........ ............................... rx::.•u: n: x::: }::::::+}:::•} :::::.::: .. xv.
... }: Cit.v........t .:.v ...... ...............lt. w::...... ....... v............. ..........................w:::: w::: isv } } } }w::. }:•ii::G.vv::::::::::::
v:.].t•,:.v.w::::......r...... v. r...... r.....v.. n.. ....... .......... v .................................. ..................:............ � ::: v............................. ............................... f;?nti.:.
Date of Application:
March 9, 1999
License Facility Name:
Tejas
Location:
3910 W. 50th St.
Type of Ownership:
Corporate Officers and Shareholders
Applicant Name:
Wayne Allen Kostroski
Managing Officer:
Wayne Allen Kostroski
Partners (Partnership):
N/A
Officers, Directors, .
Wayne Allen Kostroski
Shareholders > 5% (Corporation):
John Webster Dayton
Mark Michael Haugen
Source of Funds:
500/a Notes through Norwest Bank
50% Personal and Business funds from John Dayton
Currently Held Liquor Licenses:
Goodfellow's - Minneapolis (J.W. Dayton)
Bar Abilene - N inneapolis QM. Dayton)
Issue Date of Wine License:
October 17, 1994
Wine License Violations/Past 24 mo:
None
Seating Capacity (% of Bar Seating):
138/8 =60/o (excludes 80 lower level seats which
cannot be used in determining bar seating limits)
Number of Liquor Managers Licensed:
Five
Resources Accessed:
Criminal Histories:
- National (NCIC)
- Minnesota NIINCIS)
-Edina PD
Texas:
- Dallas PD (Dayton)
- Alcoholic Beverage Commission
Minnesota:
- Dept.of Public Safety -
Liquor and Gambling Enforcement
- Secretary of State
- Department of Revenue
Hennepin County:
-Civil Filings
- Warrants
-Jail Records
- Minneapolis PD(Haugen)
Persons Backgrounded:
John W. Dayton
Wayne A. Kostroski
Mark M. Haugen
Tejas is owned and operated by Cuisine Concepts, LLC, a privately held corporation, based in
Edina, MN. The principal interest in the corporation is John W. Dayton of Dallas,TX, who also
owns Goodfellows restaurant in Minneapolis. Wayne Kostroski is an Edina resident and local
managing officer.
The investigation of the application made by Tejas for an on sale liquor license was completed
on March 31, 1999. No information was discovered which would disqualify the corporation or
any of the principals from being granted a liquor license.
0 e �h
to
• f�CORPOAQ`T °/
1888
EDINA POLICE DEPARTMENT
INVESTIGATIVE REPORT
BUSINESS INVESTIGATION
Date of Application:
March 10, 1999
License Facility Name:
Sidney's of Edina, Inc.
Location:
3520 Galleria
Type of Ownership:
Corporate Officers and Shareholders
Applicant Name:
John Bradley Goodman
Managing Officer:
John Bradley Goodman
Partners (Partnership):
N/A
Officers, Directors,
Shareholders > 5% (Corporation):
John Bradley Goodman
Abra Blair Shapiro
Source of Funds:
80 %Mortgage and Non - Mortgage Notes, US Bank
20% Personal Funds
Currently Held Liquor Licenses:
Licenses held in AZ, MT, NE, OH and MN (Eagan,
Minneapolis; Minnetonka, St. Paul)
Issue Date of Wine License:
February 1, 1994
Wine License Violations/Past 24 mo:
No Wine Manager on Duty - February, 1999 and
October, 1998
Seating Capacity (% of Bar Seating):
After approved remodeling 234/22 =9%
Number of Liquor Managers
Licensed:
Five
PERSONAL BACKGROUND INVESTIGATIONS
Resources Accessed:
Persons Backgrounded:
Criminal Histories:
John B. Goodman
- National (NCIC)
Abra B. Shapiro
- Minnesota (MINCIS)
-Edina PD
- Wayzata PD(Goodman)
Georgia:
- Marietta PD (Shapiro)
Arizona:
- Liquor Licenses and Control
Montana:
- Dept. Of Revenue Liquor Division
Nebraska:
- Liquor Contol Commission
Ohio:
-Dept. of Liquor Control
Minnesota:
- Department of Public Safety -
Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement
- Secretary of State
-Dept. Of Revenue
-Eagan Licensing
- Minneapolis Licensing
- Minnetonka Licensing
-St. Paul Licensing
Hennepin County:
- Warrants
-Civil Filings
-Jail Records
FINDINGS
Sidney's of Edina is a privately owned and operated corporation based in Chaska, MN. The
Sidney's chain is operated and holds licenses in good standing in five U.S. states. John
Goodman is the 100% corporate shareholder of all Sidney's restaurants. John Goodman also
owns the Sage Company, which deals in commercial real estate and is listed as a source of
business funds. The Sae Company is also based in Chaska, MN.
SUMMARY
The investigation of the application made by Sidney's of Edina for an on sale liquor license
was completed on March 31, 1999. No information was discovered which would disqualify
the corporation or any of the principals from being granted a liquor license.
A, EDINA POLICE DEPARTMENT
e t4 INVESTIGATIVE REPORT
En
0
ON SALE LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATION
I 8B
d"A R
ui,
Date of Application:
March 15, 1999
License Facility Name:
Ciatti's
Location:
3220 Galleria
Type of Ownership:
Corporation (V.I. P. Restaurant Inc.)
Applicant Name:
Shannon Marie Trout Hubert
Managing Officer:
Daniel Paul Hubert / Shannon M Trout Hubert
Partners (Partnership):
NA
Officers, Directors,
Shareholders > 5% (Corporation):
Daniel Paul Hubert
Shannon Marie Trout Hubert
Source of Funds:
SBA loan and Personal loan from Richard Ray Hafdal
Currently Held Liquor Licenses:
None
Issue Date of Wine License:
November 1, 1998
Wine License Violations/Past 24 mos:
No Wine Manager (Winter 1999)
Seating Capacity (% of Bar Seating):
170/0= 0%
Number of Liquor Managers
Licensed:
7
Resources Accessed:
Criminal Histories
National (NCIC)
Minnesota (BCA)
Edina P.D.
Hennepin County:
Jail Records
Warrants
Civil Filings
State of Minnesota:
Dept. of Revenue
Secretary of State
Liquor Control Board
Eden Prairie P.D. (Hubert)
Bloomington P.D.
Bloomington Licensing
St. Paul P.D.
St. Paul Licensing
Prior Lake P. D. ( Hafdal)
Persons Backgrounded:
Daniel Paul Hubert
Shannon Marie Trout Hubert
Richard Ray Hafdal
i 'SC�M1��Y
Daniel Hubert and Shannon Trout applied for a wine license in October of 1998 after
purchasing the existing Ciatti's restaurant. These individuals have since married. The business
is incorporated as VIP Restaurant, INC. A Small Business Administration loan acquired
through Bremer Bank NA and a personal loan from Richard Hafdal were used to finance the
restaurant.
The Huberts have been involved in the restaurant business and liquor sales in other cities
previously. The first Wine License Inspection produced a violation for no licensed manager on
premise. The applicants have increased the number of licensed managers to seven (7) and they
have assured investigators that no further violations of any sort will occur.
The investigation of the application of Ciatti's restaurant for an on -sale liquor license was
completed on 040199. No information was received which would disqualify the corporation or
any of the principals from receiving a liquor license.
�1
o4 e
Cn
.ay
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works
VIA: Gordon. Hughes, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000
DATE: April 5, 1999 AGENDA ITEM IV.A.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: One 25 Ton Tandem Axle Trailer
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
1. St. Joseph Equipment 1. $ 16,992.75
2. Scharber & Sons 2. $ 23,818.00
3. Ziegler 3. $ 26,620.74
4. 4.
5. 5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
St. Joseph Equipment $ 16,992.75
GENERAL INFORMATION:
This purchase is for a 50 ton, tandem axle trailer with hydraulic ramp. This vehicle replaces a 1974
unit, #25 -534. This vehicle will be funded through the equipment replacement program.
Sign re ,!
The Recommended Bid is
within budget not
Public Works - Streets
Department
o e Cn
.ay
�eae
TO:
FROM:
VIA:
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
Mayor & City Council
Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works
Gordon Hughes, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000
DATE: April 5, 1999
ITEM DESCRIPTION: One % Ton Extended Cab Pick -Up
Company
1. McKay's Family Dodge (Hennepin County Contract #4641A8 -232)
2.
3.
4.
5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
McKay's Family Dodge
GENERAL INFORMATION:
AGENDA ITEM iV.B.
Amount of Quote or Bid
1. $ 19,223.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
$ 19,223.00
This purchase is for a' /2 ton extended cab pick -up through the Hennepin County Cooperative
Purchasing Program. This vehicle replaces a 1990 GMC Van unit, #70 -241. This vehicle will be funded
through the equipment replacement program.
Signatur
The Recommended Bid is
within budget not
Public Works - Utilities
.. Denartment
al iayul
a( Le r
0
TO:
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
.Mayor & City Council
FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works
VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000
DATE: April 5, 1999
ITEM DESCRIPTION: One % Ton Pick -Up
Company
1. Falls Automotive (Hennepin County Contract #4641 E8 -232)
2.
3.
4. .
5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
I . Falls Automotive
GENERAL INFORMATION:
AGENDA ITEM iv. c.
Amount of Quote or Bid
1. $ 16,766.50
2.
3.
4.
5.
$ 16,766.50
This purchase is for a3/4 ton pick -up through the Hennepin County Cooperative Purchasing Program.
This vehicle replaces a 1991 Chevrolet pick -up unit, #25 -211. This vehicle will be funded through the
equipment replacement program.
J
Signat e
The Recommended Bid is
within budget not within budget
Public Works - Streets
Department
Finance Di
Hughes, CitManager
11��
o� e
�y
' ~�RPOMT� • .
eBe REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works
VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000
DATE: April 5, 1998
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Two Dump Truck Bodies
Company
1: J. Craft, Inc.. (State of Minnesota Contract #1010575)
2.
3.
4.
5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
J. Craft, Inc.
GENERAL INFORMATION:
AGENDA ITEM W.D.
Amount of Quote or Bid
1. $ 105,119.64
2.
3.
4.
5.
$ 105,119.64
This purchase is for one single axle and one tandem axle dump truck bodies. This is part of the State
of Minnesota Cooperative Purchasing program. This purchase is funded from the equipment
replacement schedule. These units replace two 1985 vehicles, unit nos. 25 -344 and 25 -345.
G Public Works - Streets
Signature Department
. The Recommended Bid is '
. within budget not within budget �loh I!i , Finance Dire or
Hughes, coy Manager
4 91N�1r `�
o e
@3 �0
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works
VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000
DATE: April 5, 1999
AGENDA ITEM N.E.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: One Ton Cab & Chassis
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
1. Falls Automotive (State Contract #420857) 1. $ 18,809.00
2. 2.
3. 3
4. 4•
5. 5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Falls Automotive $ 18,809.00
GENERAL INFORMATION:
This purchase is through the State of Minnesota Cooperative Purchasing program. This unit is a cab
and chassis for a one ton vehicle. This unit will replace Unit #25 -303, a 1988 Chevrolet one ton. This
purchase is funded through the Public Works equipment replacement program.
r
Signat re
The Recommended Bid is
within budaet not within bud et JO alli , Finance Director
Public Works - Streets
Department
Ll �
on Hughes, ti Manager
�y
~���• REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works
VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000
DATE: April 5, 1999
ITEM DESCRIPTION: One' /2 Ton 4x4 Pick -Up
Company
1. McKay's Family Dodge (Hennepin County Contract #4641 A8 =232)
2. .
3.
4.
5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
McKay's Family Dodge
GENERAL INFORMATION:
AGENDA ITEM IV. F.
Amount of Quote or Bid
1. $ 16,683.00
2.
3.
4.
5.
$ 16,683.00
This purchase is fora' /2 ton 4x4 pick -up through the Hennepin County Cooperative Purchasing
Program. This vehicle replaces a 1992 Ford, unit #70 -270. This vehicle will be funded through the
equipment replacement program.
Signatu .,
The Recommended Bid is
within budget not within budget
Public Works - Utilities
- rinnartmant
iviai iayci
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works
VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000
DATE: April 5, 1999
AGENDA ITEM IV. G.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Well Repair - Well #10, Contract PW99 -1
Company
Amount of Quote or Bid
1. Cahoy, Inc.
1. $ 23,500.00
2. Alberg Water Services, LLC
2. $ 23,853.00
3. Bergerson - Caswell, Inc.
3. $ 26,140.00
4. E.H. Renner & Sons, Inc.
4. $,30,503.73
5. Keys Well Drilling Company
5. $ 37,460.00
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Cahoy, Inc.
$ 23,500.00
GENERAL INFORMATION:
This purchase is for the general overhaul and renovation of Well #10 which is located at 4500 W. 76th
Street. This project is part of our annual capital plan work to maintain our wells in proper working
condition. This improvement will be funded by the utility system.
The Engineer's Estimate for this
project was $24,533.45.
Signatur
The Recommended Bid is
within budget not within budget John
Gordon Hughes, Ch
Public Works - Utilities
/l Department, w , , .
,finance D
nager
w
o e
�
,ase
TO:
FROM:
VIA:
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
Mayor & City Council
Gordon Hughes, City Manager
Eric Anderson, Assistant City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000
DATE: April 5, 1999 AGENDA ITEM IV. H.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Council Chamber Document Imaging System
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
1. AVI Systems 1.$51,109
2. EPA Audio Visual, Inc 2.$51,167
3. 3.$
4. 4.$
5. 5.$
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
AVI Systems
GENERAL INFORMATION:
This system replaces our existing projector and camera system in the Council Chambers. The new
system provides a brighter and larger image from the projector and the camera will be able to
incorporate 8 Y2 x 11 sheets up to plan sheet sizes that can be projected on the wall. This project will
include fixing the "camera table" to the floor on the west side of the room, adding some incandescent
lighting over the podium and the table, and running wires to the table to incorporate the connection to
the City's network. The system will be funded out of reserves from our communications budget.
The City hired Jamieson and Associates to write specifications and review the bids. Jamieson and
Associates have done comparable work for Minneapolis, Brooklyn Park, Minnetonka, Eden Prairie,
Woodbury and many private organizations. They specialize in audio -video consulting.
Signature
The Recommended Bid is
within budget'
Department
L�
not within budget h Wal ' , Finance Director
0 on Hughes, City ager
o e ,
T, o REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor Smith and Members of the City Council
FROM: John Keprios, Director of Parks and Recreation
VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000
DATE: March 22, 1999
AGENDA ITEM IV. I
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Articulating Loader - Park and Recreation Department
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
1. St. Joseph Equipment Co. 1. $26,300.00
2. Twin City Swinger, Inc. 2. $26,943.44
3. Lano Equipment, Inc. 3..$39,000.00
4. Long Lake Ford Tractor 4. $43,787.00
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Account #: 0650 -4901
Joseph Equipment Co. $26,300.00 plus tax (includes
trade -in of 1973 Vermeer Tree Spade)
GENERAL INFORMATION:
This is for purchase of an articulating loader with quick attachment capabilities. This is a piece of
equipment that will be new to the Forestry Division of the Edina Park and Recreation
Department. The. equipment has the capability to be used as a back hoe for tree planting, a
grapple bucket for retrieving tree debris from the creek corridors (which in the past has always
been done by manual labor) and also has a dirt bucket. attachment designed for planting projects.
This is an all- wheel -drive piece of equipment that will make creek clean up projects and
numerous forestry projects much more efficient, cost effective and safer for maintenance staff.
This versatile piece will also assist the Street Department in various tasks. This purchase includes
trade -in of a 1973 Vermeer Tree Spade, equipment #47.456. On the rare occasion that a tree
spade is needed, it is more cost effective to contract the tree removal. As called for in the
specifications, this is a demonstration (used) piece of equipment with only 335 hours of use. For
cost savings measures, companies were asked to bid new and demonstration models. New
models with attachments ranged in price from $49,500 to $51,973 less trade -in for the tree spade.
01111,
Director
Edina Park and Recreation
Department
This Recommended bid is �W
within budget not within budget /I John )7in,hnance irector
Gordon ffug'hesQCity Manager
o� e
. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
ffel
FROM:
VIA:
Mayor & City Council
Marty Scheerer, Fire Chief
Gordon Hughes, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15.000
DATE: March 30, 1999
AGENDA ITEM v . J .
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Two 4 X 4 Utility Vehicles (Dodge Durango) at $25,272 each
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
1. McKay's Dodge (County Bid) 1.$50,544
2. 2.$
3. 3.$
4. 4.$
5. 5.$
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: McKay's Dodge
$50,544
GENERAL INFORMATION: These vehicles will replace two older sedan -type vehicles. The
Fire Department needs 4 -wheel drive vehicles, because during snow and rain storms (our
busiest times), the sedan -type vehicles have not performed well.
These vehicles are on a 10 -year replacement schedule ($2,527 /year) vs. sedans on a 7 -year
replacement schedule ($3,085 /year); therefore, a better value. The type of 4 -wheel drive utility
vehicle selected (Dodge Durango) is the County bid.
Signature
The Recommended Bid is
within budget
Fire
Department.
not within budget An Wallin, Finance Director
I - /!J-x- L
Gordon Hughes, titilanager
TO
FROM:
VIA.
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
WILLIAM BERNHJELM, CHIEF OF POLICE
GORDON L. HUGHES, CITY MANAGER
AGENDA ITEM iv (R)
DATE. 04/02/99
SUBJECT.' REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000
ITEM DESCRIPTION: One (1) 4X4 Extended Cab % Ton Dodge Pickup Truck
COMPANY BID AMOUNT
1. MCKAY'S FAMILY DODGE 1. $ 19,342
2. 2710 Coon Rapids Boulevard 2.
3. Coon Rapids, MN 55433 3.
RECOMMENDED BID:
Hennepin County Cooperative Purchasing Contract #4641A8
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Replacement vehicle for Animal Control truck to be used for a minimum of four (4)
years. 4X4 capability can be used by patrol officers during winter storms for
emergency calls.
This purchase is funded through the Animal Control Equipment Replacement budget.
The Recommen ed id is
Gordon L. Hu hes, City Manager
Department
Within Budget ❑ Not Within Budget
Jo 7n Wallin, Finance Director
TO:
FROM:
VIA:
SUBJECT.
AGENDA ITEM Iv (L).
DATE. 04/02/99
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
WILLIAM BERNHJELM, CHIEF OF POLICE
GORDON L. HUGHES, CITY MANAGER
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000
ITEM DESCRIPTION: One (1) Dodge Intrepid 4 -Door Intermediate Sedan .
COMPANY BID AMOUNT
1. ROSEDALE DODGE 1. $17,021.90
2. 2755 Long Lake Road 2.
3. Rosedale, MN 55113 3.
RECOMMENDED BID:
State of Minnesota Cooperative Purchasing Contract #421651
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Replacement vehicle for Investigative Division fleet. A 1992 unmarked vehicle will be
replaced. Investigative vehicles have a seven (7) year retention schedule.
Surveillance and undercover activities dictate vehicles other than unmarked squad
cars for investigative use.
This purchase is funded through the Police Equipment Replacement budget.
Police
Sigivure Department
The Recommended Bi s ® Within Budget ❑ Not Within Budget .
R
ordon L. Hug s, City Manager J965— Wallin, Finance Director
/1N ^r��
o e
Cn
lass
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
Agenda Item # V.A.
From: Francis J. Hoffma .
Consent
El
/j�
City Engineer d
Information Only
❑
Date: April 5, 1998
Mgr. Recommends
❑ To HRA
® To Council
Subject: Feasibility Report
Action
❑ Motion
Sanitary Sewer
® Resolution
Modifications - Part II
❑Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Recommendation:
Accept feasibility report and order plans and specifications for projects.
Info /Background:
Attached is the feasibility report from the City's consultants. This report covers the
projects that should be completed during the 1999 construction season. Staff will
review this report with City, Council and would recommend plans and specifications be
ordered for these projects. Some modifications may occur at this point but they can be
dealt with during final design.
SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM
IMPROVEMENTS
FEASIBILITY REPORT
PART II
o�
I:::
•
March 18, 1999
T DA
TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON
AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS
1500 PIPER JAFFRAY PLAZA
444 CEDAR STREET
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 -2140
PHONE:612/292 -4400 FAX:612/292 -0083
CITY OF EDINA
SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
March 18, 1999
Certification
I hereby certify that this Report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a
duly registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota.
David W. Kirkwold, P.E.
Registration No. 7834
TKDA TOLTZ, KING, DUVALL, ANDERSON
AND ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
ENGINEERS *ARCHITECTS- PLANNERS 1500 PIPER JAFFRAY PLAZA
444 CEDAR STREET
SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55101 -2140
PHONE:612/292 -4400 FAX:612/292 -0083
CITY OF EDINA
SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Paqe
Introduction 1
Evaluation of Diversion Alternatives 2
I. Diversion of Flow from Fairview Hospital 2
II. Diversion of Basin 5 and 1/5 of Basin 10 Flow 2
III. Diversion of Hospital, Basin 5, and 1/5 of Basin 10 Flow 5
Recommended Alternative 5
Project Description for Proposed Diversion 9
Project Description to Isolate St. Johns/ Ashcroft Area 11
Continuation of Inflow Reduction Program 11
Recommendations 12
List of Figures and Tables
Figure 1. Basin Map for City of Edina 3
Table I. Diversion of Basin 5 and 1/5 of Basin 10 (Alternative II) 7
Table II. Impacts of Alternative II Diversion on Three Primary
Interceptors g
Appendices
Appendix A
Appendix A.1 Diversion of Basin 5 and 1/5 of Basin 10
Appendix A.2 Isolation of St. Johns /Ashcroft Area
Appendix B
Appendix B.1 Cost Estimate for Diversion of Basin 5 and 1/5 of Basin 10
(Alternate 2.A)
Appendix B.2 Cost Estimate for Diversion of Basin 5 and 1/5 of Basin 10
(Alternate 2.13)
Appendix B.3 Cost Estimate for Diversion of Basin 5 and 1/5 of Basin 10
(Directional Boring Alternate)
Appendix B.4 Cost Estimate for St. Johns /Ashcroft Lift Station
Appendix C
Appendix C March 9, 1999 MCES Approval Letter for Proposed Diversion
Project
Appendix D
Appendix D Impact of Sanitary Sewer Improvements
H
SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
INTRODUCTION
In December 1997, TKDA completed a report for the City of Edina entitled
"Evaluation of the City's Sanitary Sewer System ". The purpose of the study was
to evaluate the existing sanitary sewer system, and in particular, its ability to
convey the quantities of wastewater generated during the July 22, 1997, rainfall
event.
f Several recommendations were developed in that report as follow:
A. Develop an Inflow Reduction Program.
B. Develop a Trunk Sewer Televising and Cleaning Program.
C. Construct the Tower St reet/Woodc rest Drive Area Relief Sewer.
D. Construct the Minnehaha Trunk Sewer Peak Flow Storage Tank.
E. Modification of the St. Johns Avenue /Ashcroft Lane Sewer.
F. Evaluate Alternatives to Increase Conveyance Capacity from the City.
TKDA was commissioned to prepare a two part feasibility report on the
recommendations lettered C, D, E, and F above. Part I of the report was
submitted on April 2, 1998 and covered recommendation C, D, and E. The
construction of these facilities has been completed. This is Part II of the report
and will cover recommendation F.
Two primary interceptor sewers currently serve the City of Edina. MCES
interceptor designated 1 -MN -345 is located in Minneapolis and receives flow
from Edina Service Area A at West 54th Street and Xerxes Avenue. MCES
interceptor designated 1 -RF -491 is located in Richfield and receives flow from
Edina Service Areas B and C at West 75th Street and Xerxes Avenue. A third
interceptor designated as 1 -RF -490 is also in Richfield and receives flow from a
small area in Edina (Basin 3) at West 65th Street and Xerxes Avenue.
The objective of this feasibility report is to investigate possible alternatives to
divert flow from Area A and /or Area B to the MCES Interceptor 1 -RF -490 in
Richfield. The intent of the diversion is to more evenly distribute sanitary sewer
flow to the three primary interceptors that serve the City. The available capacity
11413 -03
in Interceptor 1 -RF -490 will increase the overall conveyance capacity from the
city. Three alternatives were considered:
1. Diversion of Flow from Fairview Hospital
2. Diversion of Basin 5 and 1/5 of Basin 10
3. Combination of Alternatives 1 and 2
By request of the City, we have also included the feasibility of installing a lift
station to isolate the St. Johns /Ashcroft area from the main trunk sewer system.
This project would be an addition to Item E above, which was addressed in Part I
of the feasibility report.
EVALUATION OF DIVERSION ALTERNATIVES
Alternative 1: Diversion of Flow from Fairview Hospital
Fairview Hospital currently discharges to the west into the 1 -RF -491 interceptor
system (Figure 1). This option would provide a new lift station on the hospital
service and lift the flow into the 1 -RF -490 interceptor. This option assumes a
duplex lift station with each pump having a capacity of 200 gpm. The forcemain
would be approximately 200 feet of 4" PVC.
Estimated Diverted Flow: Minimum Flow = 0.01 cfs (4.5 gpm)
Average Flow = 0.18 cfs (81 gpm)
Peak Flow = 0.45 cfs (202 gpm)
Advantages: 1. Relatively simple option
2. Relatively inexpensive option
3. Provides relief to the south interceptor system
4. Does not require any construction outside of Edina city
boundary
Disadvantages: 1. Small impact on overall flow to the 33" interceptor (Area B)
2. Does not provide relief to the north 24" interceptor (Area A)
3. Does not improve metering situation (Meter 128 on
1 -RF -490 in Xerxes Avenue is currently inoperable)
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST = $ 71,880
Alternative 2: Diversion of Basin 5 and 1/5 of Basin 10 Flow
Refer to Figure 1 for orientation of the designation of service areas and basins in
the City's sewer system.
Currently, Basin 5 drains into Area A and the northeast portion of Basin 10
(approximately 1/5 of the basin) is pumped into Area B via a lift station on
2 11413 -03
Figure 1. Basin Map for City of Edina
3 11413 -03
62 nl St. near Brookview Avenue. The proposed diversion would include
installation of a new lift station on 62 nd St. and the flow from Basin 5 and 1/5 of
Basin 10 would be diverted to the new lift station via gravity sewers. The
diversion of Basin 5 would require approximately 1,570 feet of 15" PVC sewer
pipe to run along the west side of Pamela Park. The flow from Basin 10 would
require modification of the existing pipe to enter the new lift station.
Approximately 4,600 feet of 8" PVC forcemain and 1,130 feet of 18" PVC gravity
sewer would be required to get the flow from the new lift station into interceptor
1 -RF -490 at Xerxes Avenue. Refer to Appendix A.1 for a layout of the proposed
diversion. '
The estimated combined peak flow from Basin 5 and 1/5 of Basin 10 is 750
gallons per minute (515 gpm from Basin 5 and 235 gpm from 1/5 of Basin 10).
An analysis of the interceptor 1 -RF -490 in Richfield indicates the most
constricted section of the interceptor is at Penn Avenue on West 65th Street.
The rated capacity at this location is 1,420 gpm with a current estimated peak
flow of 754 gpm (before the diversion). Only 666 gallons per minute of additional
flow can be diverted without causing a surcharge in the system. A weir system
could be installed at the diversion from Basin 5 to allow a maximum diverted flow
of 415 gpm with any additional flow overflowing into the existing sewer. This
arrangement would limit the total diverted flow to approximately 650 gpm which
should not cause any surcharging in 1 -RF -490.
Existing flow from Basin 3 is not currently metered because Meter 128 on 1 -RF-
490 at the outlet from Edina into Richfield is not operable. MCES currently
estimates flow from this basin based on historical numbers. Metering flow from
the proposed diversion could be easily accomplished by adding a magmeter
installation to the forcemain. The metering site could be placed in a number of
locations.
Estimated Diverted Flow: Average Flow = 0.51 cfs (229 gpm)
Peak Flow = 1.679 cfs (754 gpm)
Peak flow consists of approximately 1. 15 cfs (516 gpm) from Basin 5 and 0.529
cfs (237 gpm) from 20% of Basin 10.
Advantages: 1. Provides significant relief to the Area A interceptor and some
relief to the Area B interceptor
2. Does not require modification of the existing 1 -RF -490
interceptor in Richfield
3. Would provide metering for the diverted flow; Basin 3 flow
would still be unmetered.
4 11413 -03
Disadvantages: 1. Significant construction required including proposed
directional boring and pipe jacking under Highway 62
2. Potential for significant traffic impacts
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST (Avg. of 2 alternates) _ $926,540
Alternative 3: Diversion of Hospital, Basin 5, and 1/5 of Basin 10 Flow
This is the most comprehensive diversion essentially combining I. and II. above.
The combined flow from the two previous options causes a surcharge in 1 -RF-
490 great enough to require sewer modifications to increase capacity in
Richfield. In addition to the work discussed in the prior two options, a section of
1 -RF -490 from just west of Upton Ave. to Penn Ave. on West 65'h Street in
Richfield would need to be modified. A new section of 18" PVC sewer would be
re -laid at a grade of 0.21 % to increase capacity to handle the increased flow.
Approximately 1,868 feet of sewer would require modification.
The capacity of the proposed 18" sewer at a grade of 0.21 % would be 2,200
gpm. The current estimated peak flow is 754 gpm which would leave an
available capacity of 1,446 gpm.
Estimated Diverted Flow: Average Flow = 0.69 cfs (310 gpm)
Peak Flow = 2.129 cfs (956 gpm)
Advantages: 1. Provides significant relief to the Area A interceptor combined
with greater relief to the Area B interceptor
2. Would improve the constricted portion of 1 -RF -490 in
Richfield
Disadvantages: 1. Most expensive alternative
2. Extensive traffic impacts and major construction
3. Requires construction in Richfield
TOTAL ESTIMATED COST = $1,164,160
RECOMMENDED ALTERNATIVE
All of the listed choices are feasible, but Alternative II (diversion of Basin 5 and
1/5 of Basin 10) is the most readily accomplished. This alternative reduces the
loading on both Area A and Area B while fully utilizing the available capacity in
the 1 -RF -490 interceptor. This alternative does not require any construction
outside of Edina, which simplifies the construction process.
5 11413 -03
The Fairview Hospital diversion may be the most cost effective per volume of
diversion. However, this alternative does not aid Area A, which was the most
affected area during the July 22, 1997 storm. The diversion would only provide
nominal relief to Area B. The intent of the project would be to reduce flow under
heavy storm events. The diversion of hospital flow is not weather dependent, so
reductions may not occur during a particular storm event. This alternative does
not provide the attenuation we are looking for during the targeted storm event.
Alternative III combines I and II. When the Fairview Hospital flow is added to the
flow from Basin 5 and 1/5 of Basin 10, the combined flow is greater than the
sewer capacity of the interceptor in Richfield. Substantial construction would be
required in Richfield to maintain the integrity of the system. The project would
encounter significant coordination issues between Edina, Richfield, and MCES.
Alternative III only provides a slight improvement over the recommended
Alternative II and does not warrant the increased cost and difficulty in
administration.
Table I. shows the expected impact of the diversion of Basin 5 and 1/5 of Basin
10 on 1 -RF -490 in the downstream Richfield section. The interceptor will be at
full capacity at the Penn Avenue control point, but we would not anticipate
surcharging at any locations under peak flow conditions. The assumptions used
to create the table are considered conservative and we would expect actual peak
flows to be somewhat less than was used in our evaluation.
Table II. shows the impact of the proposed diversion on the three main
interceptors that serve Edina. 1 -MN -345 is the 24" interceptor that serves
Area A. This was the area with the most problems during the July 22 storm
event and the table indicates a surcharge would be expected in the current
system under peak flow conditions. The table also shows the reduction in flow
created by the diversion from Basin 5 would result in the pipe theoretically having
enough capacity under peak flow conditions. The current estimated peak flow
from Area A is 5,090 gpm so a diversion of 415 gpm would constitute an 8.2%
reduction in flow.
1 -RF -491 is the 33" interceptor that serves Area B. Table II. shows a surcharge
would still be expected in this pipe under peak flow conditions even after the
diversion. However, this system had few problems during the July 22 event
indicating there was enough storage capacity in the system to buffer the effects
of that peak flow event. The diversion would provide some relief to this system.
The current estimated peak flow from Area B and C is 9,500 gpm so a diversion
of 235 gpm would constitute a 2.5% reduction in flow. The primary benefit of the
diversion would be the better utilization of capacity within the three interceptors.
All three pipes would be at or above full capacity during a peak flow event.
6 11413 -03
Table I. Diversion of Basin 5 and 1/5 of Basin 10 (Alternative II)
CONTROL POINT LOCATION
PIPE
TYPE
PIPE
DIAM IN
PIPE
GRADE
%
PIPE
I CAP.
C.F.S.
AVG
FLOW'
PEAK
FLOWZ
PERCENT
PIPE CAP.
I AT PEAK
PEAK FLOW
INCLUDING
EDINA DIV.
PERCENT
PIPE CAP.
W/ DIVERSION
WEST 65TH ST @ PENN AVE PT 1
RCP
18
0.09
3.16
0.511
1.685
53.32 3
3.133
99.15
HUMBOLDT AVE @ WEST 66TH ST PT 2
RCP
21
0.21
7.25
0.760
2.509
34.61
3.957
54.58
WEST 66TH ST @ PILLSBURY AVE PT 3
RCP
30
0.067
10.70
2.239
7.388
69.05
8.836
82.58
EAST 66TH ST ® COLUMBUS AVE PT 4
RCP
33
0.067
13.70
3.268
10.784
78.72
12.232
89.28
TOTAL DIVERTED PEAK FLOWS INCLUDE: 0.918 CFS FROM BASIN 5 AND 0.53 CFS FROM 20% OF BASIN 10. TOTAL FLOW = 1.448 CFS (650 GPM)
' ESTIMATES BASED ON AVERAGE FLOW DATA FROM METER 130 (1996 -1998) BROKEN DOWN ON AN APPROXIMATE NUMBER OF BLOCKS SERVED.
ASSUMPTIONS FOR AVERAGE FLOW BASED ON THE FOLLOWING: AVERAGE RICHFIELD FLOW = 3.83 MGD (5.93 CFS) BASED ON METERING RECORDS FROM 1996 -1998
CONTRIBUTING AREA: APPROX. 63% OF FLOW DRAINS TO 1- RF-490 (3.73 CFS) AND 37% DRAINS TO 1 -RF -491 (2.20 CFS)
APPROXIMATELY 374 BLOCKS CONTRIBUTE TO 1 -RF -490 AND 221 BLOCKS CONTRIBUTE TO 1 -RF -491
AVERAGE FLOW OUT OF EDINA (BASIN 3) = 0.211 CFS BASED ON SANITARY SEWER EVALUATION REPORT
PT 1 AVG FLOW = 0.211 CFS + 30 BLOCKS = 0.511 CFS (30 BLOCKS /374 BLOCKS X 3.73 CFS)
PT 2 AVG FLOW = 0.511 CFS + 25 BLOCKS = 0.760 CFS (25 BLOCKS /374 BLOCKS X 3.73 CFS)
PT 3 AVG FLOW = 0.760 CFS + 148 BLOCKS = 2.239 CFS (148 BLOCKS /374 BLOCKS X 3.73 CFS)
PT 4 AVG FLOW = 2.239 CFS + 103 BLOCKS = 3.268 CFS (103 BLOCKS /374 BLOCKS X 3.73 CFS)
OTHER 68 BLOCKS CONTRIBUTE TO 1 -RF -490 AFTER PT 4
2 PEAK FLOWS BASED ON AVERAGE FLOWS MULTIPLIED BY A PEAKING FACTOR OF 3.3 (3.3 IS THE PEAKING FACTOR FOR ALL OF EDINA DERIVED FROM THE SANITARY SEWER EVALUATION).
3 ADDITIONAL AVAILABLE CAPACITY WITHOUT THEORETICAL SURCHARGING = 3.16 CFS - 1.685 CFS = 1.475 CFS (660 GPM)
7 11413 -03
Table II. Impacts of Alternative II Diversion on Three Primary Interceptors
CONTROL POINT LOCATION
PIPE
TYPE
PIPE
DIAM IN
PIPE
GRADEJ
%
I PIPE
CAP.
C.F.S.
PEAK
FLOW
CFS
PERCENT
PIPE CAP.
AT PEAK
PEAK FLOW
AFTER
DIVERSION CFS
PERCENT
PIPE CAP.
W/ DIVERSION
AREA A - XERXES AVE @ 54TH ST
VCP
24
0.16
10.69
11.329
105.98
10.411
97.39
WEST 65TH ST @ PENN AVE PT 1
RCP
18
0.09
1
3.16
1.685
53.32
3.133
99.15
AREA B - XERXES AVE lei YORK TERRACE
RCP
33
0.1
18.12
21.146
116.70
20.616
113.77
TOTAL DIVERTED PEAK FLOWS INCLUDE: 0.918 CFS FROM BASIN 5 AND 0.53 CFS FROM 20% OF BASIN 10. TOTAL FLOW = 1.448 CFS (650 GPM)
8 11413 -03
The estimated cost for the proposed diversion project is $919,390 for
Alternate 2.A and $933,690 for Alternate 2.13 (refer to Appendix A.1 for alternate
layouts and to Appendix B.1 and B.2 for cost information). A description of the
two alternates is included in the next section.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION FOR PROPOSED DIVERSION
A preliminary layout for the diversion of Basin 5 and 1/5 of Basin 10 is included
as Appendix A.1. The Basin 5 diversion will start with installation of anew
diversion manhole on the 10" sewer at West 601h Street just east of Oaklawn
Avenue. A set of overflow weirs will be installed to allow a maximum of 650 gpm
to flow to the new diversion. Any excess flow would overtop the backup weir and
flow to Area A as it currently operates. Approximately 1,570 feet of 15" PVC
gravity sewer would be installed by open cut method along the west edge of
Pamela Park. The diversion sewer would empty into the new submersible type
lift station installed just north of West 62 nd Street.
The proposed lift station would be 10 feet in diameter and approximately 18 feet
deep. It would contain 3 identical 15 HP submersible, non -clog, centrifugal
pumps each with a maximum capacity of 650 gpm. Two of the units could be
installed with variable speed drives to provide more efficient operation during
non -peak times. The proposed 4" pumps would discharge into an 8" PVC
forcemain.
A 6' diameter metering manhole would be installed adjacent to the lift station.
The meter would be a 6" diameter magmeter with appurtenant valving and
bypass piping. Locating the meter manhole adjacent to the lift station would be a
standard arrangement. However, the location of the meter manhole would be
dependent on approval by MCES. MCES would generally be responsible for
metering flow into their interceptor system. MCES would be responsible for
operation and maintenance so they would need to have input into the
construction location and type of metering station. There would likely be some
cost sharing between Edina and MCES for installation of metering provisions.
Approximately 4,600 feet of 8" PVC forcemain would be required along with
1,130 feet of 18" PVC gravity sewer to route the diverted flow to 1 -RF -490 at
Xerxes Avenue and 65'h Street. The proposed route starts at the lift station and
goes south to West 62 "d Street. The forcemain will follow West 62nd Street to the
East using open trench construction. Directional boring could be used to get the
forcemain from just west of France Avenue to Ewing Avenue under a 20' right of
way along the property line between the affected houses. The easement for this
work would need to be acquired by the City. The boring method would reduce
traffic impacts on France Avenue and would eliminate the need to tear open
yards of affected residents.
9 11413 -03
The open trench installation would continue along West 62 nd Street until
Strachauer Park where installation could move south out of the street. An 18"
steel casing pipe would be jacked under Highway 62 southeast to Heritage
Drive. The casing pipe would be used to protect the 8" forcemain. Open trench
installation would continue south on York Avenue to West 64" Street. Two
alternatives have been considered to get the flow from West 64th Street to the
final destination in Xerxes Avenue. The two alternatives are shown in Appendix
A.1.
Alternate 2.A proposes a conversion from 8" forcemain to 18" PVC gravity sewer
at West 64th Street on York Avenue. The gravity sewer would continue south on
York Avenue to West 65th Street. The existing 12" sewer would be replaced
with new 18" PVC sewer from York Avenue to Xerxes Avenue along West 65th
Street. The sewer would need to take a jog north so an existing easement can
be utilized. When the sewer reaches Xerxes Avenue it would jog back to the
south and connect into the existing interceptor.
Alternate 2.B proposes the same conversion from 8" forcemain to 18" PVC
gravity sewer at West 64th Street on York Avenue. However, the gravity sewer
would turn East on West 64th Street to the median of Xerxes Avenue. The 18"
sewer would then turn south and follow the median to the termination manhole in
Xerxes Avenue at West 65th Street. Either open cut or directional boring could
be used for construction along Xerxes Avenue. Alternate B would cause a
greater traffic impact due to the increased construction in Xerxes Avenue.
We anticipate all trenching in the street could be limited to half of the roadway.
All street replacement will be made with eight inches of aggregate base and
three inches of bituminous surfacing. Bituminous driveways will be replaced with
six inches of aggregate base and two inches of bituminous surfacing. Concrete
driveways will be replaced with four inches of aggregate base and six inches of
concrete pavement. Disturbed boulevards will be repaired with four inches of
topsoil and new sod.
The construction method described above is referred to as the "open cut"
method where the utilities are installed in trenches dug with an excavator. The
disadvantage of this type of construction is the disruption of traffic and the
extensive restoration of surface improvements. Normally this method is less
expensive than other methods.
We would also recommend bidding directional boring of all forcemain as an
alternate. The new sewer pipe installed by directional drilling will be 8 inch
diameter high density polyethylene (HDPE) pipe rather than the PVC pipe used
for the open trench method. The joints in the pipe are heat -fused together
making a final product that is jointless. This procedure works well for installation
of forcemain because strict control of grade is not necessary.
10 11413 -03
This method of construction is believed to have a higher project cost than the
"open cut" method. However, this method offers the benefit of less disruption to
traffic, boulevards, and inconvenience to the adjacent property owner. The best
way to compare the costs of the two installation methods is to receive bids for
both methods.
The estimated cost to complete Alternate 2.A using directional boring for all
forcemain installation is $1,405,990 as shown in Appendix B.3.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION TO ISOLATE ST. JOHNS /ASHCROFT AREA
The sanitary sewer capacity serving the St. Johns /Ashcroft area was increased
under Part I of this feasibility report. However, there is still a chance of sanitary
backups in this neighborhood if the trunk sewer has a significant surcharge. The
proposed solution is to provide complete separation of this area from the trunk
sewer. This will require installation of a small lift station prior to the trunk sewer
connection.
A proposed location for the new lift station is on the 21" sewer just east of the
Garrison Lane cul de sac (refer to Appendix A.2). The flow would be lifted to
provide the desired isolation and then discharge back into the same sewer at the
closest manhole. There would be no affects on flow rates, but the area would be
protected from surcharging.
The proposed lift station would be 5 feet in diameter and approximately 20 feet
deep. It would contain two identical 2 HP submersible, non -clog, centrifugal
pumps each with a maximum capacity of 110 gpm. The discharge would be 4"
PVC pipe.
The estimated cost for this project is $63,950 (refer to Appendix B.4).
CONTINUATION OF INFLOW REDUCTION PROGRAM
Attached as Appendix C is the March 9, 1999 MCES approval letter for the
proposed diversion project. Approval of the proposed diversion project for Basin
5 and 1/5 of Basin 10 was predicated on the City's continuing efforts to reduce
inflow into the sanitary sewer system. The following table illustrates the
significance of inflow on the sanitary sewer system during a peak storm event.
11 11413 -03
Estimated Peak Sanitary Sewer Flow
City of Edina
July 22, 1997
Flow Component
Area A
Area B
Area C
Total Flow
Base Flow, gpm
625
840
1,140
2,605
Infiltration, gpm
1,070
1,220
1,060
3,350
Inflow, gpm
3,395
3,140
2,100
8,635
Maximum, gpm
5,090
5,200
4,300
14,590
Inflow accounts for about 60% of the total flow expected during a peak flow
event. Area A has the worst inflow problem with about 67% of total flow
represented by inflow. The City has developed an aggressive inflow reduction
program based on the recommendations of the "Evaluation of the City's Sanitary
Sewer System" report prepared by TKDA. The goal of the program is to reduce
inflow quantities by 40% over the next three years. The program includes the
following elements.
• Eliminate sump pump connections to the sanitary sewer system through a
city wide inspection program.
• Install gasketed manhole covers on all manholes and seal manhole tops.
• Selectively replace older brick manholes susceptible to flooding.
If this program is successful in reducing inflow by 40 %, we would not expect.
surcharging to occur in any of the primary interceptors during peak storm events.
Appendix D contains tabulations that illustrate the estimated impact of the
proposed sanitary sewer improvements on the July 22, 1997 storm event. The
tables indicate the expected impact of the proposed sanitary sewer diversion, the
new retention tank, and the proposed inflow reduction program. In summary, the
overall impact of these improvements is an estimated reduction of the City's
maximum or peak sanitary sewer flow from 14,590 gpm down to 11,140 gpm.
These flow rates compare to the maximum estimated conveyance capacity of the
three interceptors leaving the City at 13, 585 gpm.
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Basin 5 and 1/5 of Basin 10 Sanitary Sewer Diversion to 1 -RF -490.
This project is feasible and will provide for an increased conveyance
capacity of 650 gpm for the City's sanitary sewer system. If this project is
authorized, we recommend that plans be prepared and bids received for
12 11413 -03
both the open cut method and the horizontal directional drill method so an
accurate comparison of the costs can be made. Further review will be
required to determine whether Alternate 2.A or Alternate 2.13 should be
selected for final design.
2. St. Johns Avenue /Ashcroft Lane Sanitary Sewer Lift Station.
This project is feasible and it is recommended the project be constructed
in order to provide additional protection for the homes served in this area.
3. Continue the Inflow Reduction Program
Continue to actively pursue the inflow reduction program that has been
adopted by the City. MCES approval of the proposed projects will be
predicated on the continuing efforts of the City to reduce inflow.
13 11413 -03
APPENDIX A
1Ir T
-� E - - �-'J _ 'T " R w I — :7+
�- -� -
_ °l_- -J E J –L�J
,}I� 1
+ .-- - - - - -- - Jam- l� < -r -� fi-�
9.
--+ •1 C
GIST 57
_ ,s"'
1 1
O._/IIr�, IIr, fI-_� 1�_'_.., 1. _�Ir .. ,II. .� 1 _ __�_� -T; 1 I
.!� IM! I
IL
IT-
--T- 77 V : -
�
�T T i—T -- -
4��r - -I —i --�- -,� --iii i j-- – --� �- - - ----� - -1— -1- - - . ° Pvc owmay
TL
t:z:
—L_�
CO \ HW,Y/ NO 62
01
N - --
` 9
� \ 9' 12'
�K
.6 SW
Sc" NF
1
� 1
i i jl
1
v 12' 1�� 12'
-T -- --T
-18. 46 NC PIPE
1 1 _
ALTERDMTE V FORCEIIAIN
(POSSIBLE 18- GRAVITY)
I�
- --
1
It
s
r - EXwm -RAF 490
MANHOLE
ExISitNC 12-
r
�e� c�IAVnr i
FEASIBILITY STUDY
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
SAATITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
Diversion of Basin 5
and .1/5' of Basin 10
APPENDIX A.1 i
/ -- — — — — — — — —
{ \\ - --- -- - -- ---
-----
U
N
0 tao 200 36
scoL N fQT
APPENDIX B
Appendix B.1 Cost Estimate for Diversion of Basin 5 and 1/5 of Basin 10 (Alternate 2.A)
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
COMMISSION NO. 11413 -03
SANITARY SEWER DIVERSION
Basin 5 and 1/5 of Basin 10 to 1- RF-490
Item
Unit
No.
Description
Quantity
Unit
Price
Amount
1
Mobilization
1.00
LS
$ 25,000.00
$
25,000.00
2
10' Diameter Lift Station
1.00
EA
$ 16,000.00
$
16,000.00
3
15 hp Submersible Pumps
3.00
EA
$ 9,500.00
$
28,500.00
4
Electrical
1.00
LS
$ 15,000.00
$
15,000.00
5
Instrumentation and Control
1.00
LS
$ 15,000.00
$
15,000.00
6
Excavation and Backfill
640.00
CY
$ 10.00
$
6,400.00
7
Pipe and Valves
1.00
LS
$ 5,000.00
$
5,000.00
8
Sitework and Restoration
1.00
LS
$ 15,000.00
$
15,000.00
9
6' Diameter Meter Manhole
1.00
EA
$ 5,000.00
$
5,000.00
10
6" Magmeter with Instrumentation and Valves
1.00
LS
$ 28,190.00
$
28,190.00
11
15" PVC Sanitary Sewer
1,450.00
LF
$ 40.00
$
58,000.00
12
18" PVC Sanitary Sewer
1,130.00
LF
$ 45.00
$
50,850.00
13
Standard Manhole
3.00
EA
$ 4,000.00
$
12,000.00
14
8" PVC Forcemain
4,600.00
LF
$ 40.00
$
184,000.00
15
Traffic Control
1.00
LS
$ 10,000.00
$
10,000.00
16
Remove /Dispose Bituminous
5,600.00
SY
$ 3.00
$
16,800.00
17
Bituminous
950.00
TN
$ 33.00
$
31,350.00
18
Pipe Jacking
300.00
LF
$ 275.00
$
82,500.00
19
Easement Purchase
5,000.00
SF
$ 2.00
$
10,000.00
20
Directional Boring
1.00
LS
$ 25,000.00
$
25,000.00
Subtotal $ 639,590.00
+ 15% Contingencies $ 95,900.00
+ 25% Engineering, Legal, Administration $ 183,900.00
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST $ 919,390.00
11413 -03
Appendix B.2 Cost Estimate for Diversion of Basin 5 and 1/5 of Basin 10 (Alternate 2.13)
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
COMMISSION NO. 11413 -03
SANITARY SEWER DIVERSION
Basin 5 and 1/5 of Basin 10 to 1- RF-490
Item
Unit
No.
Description
Quantity
Unit
Price
Amount
1
Mobilization
1.00
LS
$ 25,000.00
$
25,000.00
2
10' Diameter Lift Station
1.00
EA
$ 16,000.00
$
16,000.00
3
15 hp Submersible Pumps
3.00
EA
$ 9,500.00
$
28,500.00
4
Electrical
1.00
LS
$ 15,000.00
$
15,000.00
5
Instrumentation and Control
1.00
LS
$ 15,000.00
$
15,000.00
6
Excavation and Backfill
640.00
CY
$ 10.00
$
6,400.00
7
Pipe and Valves
1.00
LS
$ 5,000.00
$
5,000.00
8
Sitework and Restoration
1.00
LS
$ 15,000.00
$
15,000.00
9
6' Diameter Meter Manhole
1.00
EA
$ 5,000.00
$
5,000.00
10
6" Magmeter with Instrumentation and Valves
1.00
LS
$ 28,190.00
$
28,190.00
11
15" PVC Sanitary Sewer
1,450.00
LF
$ 40.00
$
58,000.00
12
18" PVC Sanitary Sewer
1,130.00
LF
$ 45.00
$
50,850.00
13
Standard Manhole
3.00
EA
$ 4,000.00
$
12,000.00
14
8" PVC Forcemain
4,600.00
LF
$ 40.00
$
184,000.00
15
Traffic Control
1.00
LS
$ 20,000.00
$
20,000.00
16
Remove /Dispose Bituminous
5,600.00
SY
$ 3.00
$
16,800.00
17
Bituminous
950.00
TN
$ 33.00
$
31,350.00
18
Pipe Jacking
300.00
LF
$ 275.00
$
82,500.00
19
Easement Purchase
5,000.00
SF
$ 2.00
$
10,000.00
20
Directional Boring
1.00
LS
$ 25,000.00
$
25,000.00
Subtotal $ 649,590.00
+ 15% Contingencies $ 97,400.00
+ 25% Engineering, Legal, Administration $ 186,700.00
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST $ 933,690.00
11413 -03
Appendix B.3 Cost Estimate for Diversion of Basin 5 and 1/5 of Basin 10
(Directional Boring Alternate)
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
COMMISSION NO. 11413 -03
SANITARY SEWER DIVERSION
Basin 5 and 1/5 of Basin 10 to 1 -RF -490
Item
No.
Description
Ouantity
Unit
Unit
Price
Amount
1
Mobilization
1.00
LS
$
25,000.00
$
25,000.00
2
10' Diameter Lift Station
1.00
EA
$
16,000.00
$
16,000.00
3
15 hp Submersible Pumps
3.00
EA
$
9,500.00
$
28,500.00
4
Electrical
1.00
LS
$
15,000.00
$
15,000.00
5
Instrumentation and Control
1.00
LS
$
15,000.00
$
15,000.00
6
Excavation and Backfill
640.00
CY
$
10.00
$
6,400.00
7
Pipe and Valves
1.00
LS
$
5,000.00
$
5,000.00
8
Sitework and Restoration
1.00
LS
$
15,000.00
$
15,000.00
9
6' Diameter Meter Manhole
1.00
EA
$
5,000.00
$
5,000.00
10
6" Magmeter with Instrumentation and Valves
1.00
LS
$
28,190.00
$
28,190.00
11
15" PVC Sanitary Sewer
1,450.00
LF
$
40.00
$
58,000.00
12
18" HDPE Sanitary Sewer (Trenchless Method)
1,130.00
LF
$
150.00
$
169,500.00
13
Standard Manhole
3.00
EA
$
4,000.00
$
12,000.00
14
8" HDPE Forcemain (Trenchless Method)
4,600.00
LF
$
100.00
$
460,000.00
15
Traffic Control
1.00
LS
$
20,000.00
$
20,000.00
16
Remove /Dispose Bituminous
1.00
LS
$
2,000.00
$
2,000.00
17
Bituminous
1.00
LS
$
5,000.00
$
5,000.00
18
Pipe Jacking
300.00
LF
$
275.00
$
82,500.00
19
Easement Purchase
5,000.00
SF
$
2.00
$
10,000.00
Subtotal
$
978,090.00
+ 15% Contingencies $ 146,700.00
+ 25% Engineering, Legal, Administration $ 281,200.00
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST $ 1,405,990.00
11413 -03
Appendix B.4 Cost Estimate for St. Johns /Ashcroft Lift Station
PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
COMMISSION NO. 11413 -03
SANITARY SEWER LIFT STATION
Just East of Garrison Lane Cul De Sac - To Serve St. Johns /Ashcroft Area
Item Unit
No. Description Quantity Unit Price Amount
1
5' Diameter Lift Station
1.00
EA
$ 10,000.00
$
10,000.00
2
2 HP Submersible Pump
2.00
EA
$
6,500.00
$
13,000.00
3
Electrical
1.00
LS
$
5,000.00
$
5,000.00
4
Controls and Instrumentation
1.00
LS
$
5,000.00
$
5,000.00
5
Excavation and Backfill
500.00
CY
$
10.00
$
5,000.00
6
Pipe and Valves
1.00
LS
$
3,500.00
$
3,500.00
7
Sitework and Restoration
1.00
LS
$
5,000.00
$
5,000.00
Subtotal
+ 10% Contingencies
+ 25% Engineering, Legal, Administration
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST
$ 46,500.00
$ 4,650.00
$ 12,800.00
$ 63,950.00
11413 -03
APPENDIX C
Metropolitan Council
Working for the Region, Planning for the Future
March 9, 1999 Environmental Services
Mr. Daniel J. Dorval, PE
Toltz, King, Duvall, Anderson & Associates, Inc.
1500 Piper Jaffray Plaza
444 Cedar Street
St. Paul, MN 55101 -2140
RE: Results of system capacity check, 1- RF-490
Proposed Sanitary Sewer Diversion
City of Edina
Dear Mr. Dorval:
` 191 + AR 1 7 AM 1 -0,0
This letter is in follow -up to our December 21, 1998 letter to you regarding the above
referenced project.
The Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) has concluded its review of
the system capacity of interceptor 1- RF490 in relation to the proposed flow diversion
within the city of Edina to the aforementioned MCES facility. The findings of that
review concluded that there is sufficient reserve capacity in 1- RF490 and downstream
metropolitan facilities to accommodate the increased flows resulting from the proposed
diversion.
The MCES conducted temporary flow monitoring on 1- RF-490 at two separate locations
during the period between December 11 and December 18, 1998. With the results of this
data, use of the Council's GIS mapping databases, and consideration of the future
proposed uses of the facility by Richfield, we were able to verify the assumptions used in
your cursory review of the system capacity dated November 24, 1998.
It is our understanding that the diversion of flow will be within portions of the City's
sanitary sewer system located in service districts 10 and 5. It is also our understanding
that the City's liftstation, Liftstation No. 12, will be reconstructed and its discharge
diverted to 1 -RF -490. The portion of District 10 which currently flows to liftstation 12
will then be served through interceptor 1- RF-490 as opposed to 1- RF-491 as it is now.
We also understand that a sanitary relief sewer will be constructed between District 5 and
10, which will allow flow to backup into district 10, and eventually conveyed to
liftstation 12. Flows through this "relief sewer" shall be controlled such that the
maximum allowable flow through the relief line is 415 gpm. Your calculations included
in the letter indicated that the diverted flow from district 10 when added to the re- directed
flow from district 5 would be 650 gpm. The liftstation would be designed so that its
maximum pumping capacity would be equal to the combined diverted areas or 650 gpm.
The MCES has no objection to the City's proposed diversion of flow as outlined in your
letter of November 24, 1998, the maximum permissible rate of flow for that diversion
230 Fast Fifth Street St. Paul. Minnesota 55101 -1626 (651) 602 -1005 Fax 602 -1183 'IDD/77Y 229 -3760
Mr. Daniel J. Dorval
March 9, 1999
Page 2 of 2
will be governed by the maximum pumping capacity of the reconstructed local lift station
No. 12. The firm pumping capacity of this lift station must not be greater than 650 gpm.
As indicated in your November letter, a magnetic flow meter will need to be incorporated
into the design of the overall project. It is my understanding that the intent is to provide a
meter vault just outside of the lift station. It is also my understanding that both electric
and telephone services are available at this location. Both are required to instrument the
meter. The MCES has a standard meter vault structure detail that will need to be
included in the lift station/forcemain design. Please contact Mr. Fred Banister at (65 1)
602 -4514 to coordinate the meter vault structure and forcemain design.
We request that once the detailed design of the relief sewer and flow control structure is
completed, that a copy be submitted to the MCES for final approval. We also request
that a copy of the plans for the re- constructed lift station and a copy of the design
calculations be submitted for final approval.
If you have any questions regarding our review of the metropolitan system, the temporary
flow monitoring, or the approval of the City's proposed local system diversion, please
don't hesitate to call either me at 602 -1116, or Kyle L. Colvin, Sr. Staff Engineer, at 602-
1151.
Sincerely,
ZiLy'x'/-
Donald S. Bluhm
Manager, Municipal Services Section
DSB:KLC;klc
cc: John Thom, Richfield Wastewater Superintendent
William Moeller, Assistant General Manager, Interceptor Systems
Fred Banister, Engineering Manager
Kyle L. Colvin, Sr. Staff Engineer
1
APPENDIX D
Appendix D. Impact of Sanitary Sewer Improvements
Note: All maximum estimated flow rates are based on the July 22, 1997 storm event
IMPACT OF FLOW DIVERSION
Flow Component
Area A
Area B
Area C
Area D'
Total Flow
Base Flow, gpm
545
785
1,140
135
2.605
Infiltration, gpm
940
1,145
1,060
205
3,350
Inflow, gpm
3,190
3,035
2.100
310
8,635
Maximum, gpm
4,675
4,965
4,300
650
14,590
Area Y= Basin 5+ 1/5 Basin 10
IMPACT OF RETENTION TANK (1000 GPM OFF PEAK FLOW)
Flow Component Area A
Base Flow, gpm 545
Infiltration, gpm 940
Inflow, gpm 2,190
Maximum, gpm 3,675
IMPACT OF INFLOW REDUCTION
Flow Component
Area A
Area .B
Area C
Area D'
Total Flow
Base Flow, gpm
545
785
1,140
135
2.605
Infiltration, gpm
940
1,145
1,060
205
3,350
Inflow, gpm
1,920
1,820
1,260
185
5,185
Maximum, gpm
3,405
3,750
3,460
525
11,140
TOTAL SEWER CAPACITY
Area A, 24" Sewer Capacity — 4,800 gpm
Area B + C, 33" Sewer Capacity — 8,135 gpm
Area D', 18" Sewer Capacity Available — 650 gpm
Total Conveyance Capacity
' Flows from Basin 3 are not depicted.
13,585 gpm
o e
tA
o Cn
.�Y
\N� eRpae�T9 //
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Francis J. Hoffman
City Engineer
Date: April 5, 1999
Subject: Public Hearing - Set Hearing
Date & Receive Feasibility
° Studies for:
1. Brookside Heights Street
Resurfacing Imp. A -184
2. Skyline Drive & Blossom
Court Street Imp. A -185
3. Highlands Park
Neighborhood Street
Resurfacing Imp. -A -186
4. Rosemary Lane Street
Resurfacing Imp. A -187
5. Eden Prairie Road
Street Resurfacing Imp.
A -188
Recommendation:
Set hearing date of May 3, 1999
Info /Background:
Agenda Item #
Consent
Information Only
Mgr. Recommends
Action
V.B.
❑ToHRA
® To Council
® Motion
® Resolution
❑ Ordinance
❑ Discussion
City staff is requesting these street improvements based on the condition of the streets.
Staff has reviewed these projects and feel they are feasible. Staff would suggest a
public hearing date of May 3, 1999.
lu
ow9e FEASIBILITY STUDY - A184
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
�° CITY OF EDINA
•, �.
laas
STREET IMPROVEMENTS
AND CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER
BROOKSIDE HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOOD
APRIL 5, 1999
LOCATION: Oxford Avenue from Interlachen Boulevard to end of cul -de -sac, Bedford
Avenue, William Avenue, and Hankerson Avenue South from Interlachen
Boulevard to West 52nd Street, West 51St Street from Oxford Avenue to
Hankerson Avenue South, West 52nd Street from Bedford Avenue to
Hankerson Avenue South, Grandview Lane, and 53`d Street West from
Grandview Lane to Vernon Avenue.
01F
gill 1
Proiect Location
PAVEMENT
PAVEMENT
3 & GUTTER
INITIATION & ISSUES: This project was staff initiated by the Edina Engineering Department as part
of the neighborhood street reconstruction program. The street department
requested that these streets be reconstructed due to the poor pavement
condition.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: The existing roadways were constructed during the years of 1956 (Oxford,
Bedford, & William Avenue's) and 1966 ( Hankerson Avenue, West 51St &
West 52nd Street's). The roadways in this neighborhood consist of 22 foot to
28 foot wide bituminous rural and urban sections. The pavements are in
relatively poor condition throughout the neighborhood. All of the pavements
are very brittle with major block cracking throughout. The roadways of
Feasibility Study
Brookside Heights Neighborhood
April 5, 1999
Page 2
Bedford Avenue, Oxford Avenue, and West 52nd Street have numerous
patches. These roadways appear to be at the end of their useful life;
overlaying or seal- coating this pavement would not be feasible. The majority
of the neighborhood has existing concrete curb & gutter. Two streets,
Bedford Avenue and one block of Oxford Avenue do not have concrete curb
and gutter. Bituminous curbs exist sporadically on both Oxford and Bedford
Avenue. These bituminous curbs have been placed to prevent erosion on
the steeper grades between West 51s' Street and Interlachen Boulevard.
Bedford Avenue and Oxford Avenue also contain large trees adjacent to the
roadway that will need to be protected during the proposed construction.
Pavement condition on Bedford Avenue
Two residences along Bedford Avenue have bituminous parking pads
adjacent to the roadway. Driveway curb cuts for these properties will be
addressed during final design.
Parking pull -out along Bedford Avenue
Feasibility Study
Brookside Heights Neighborhood
April 5, 1999
Page 3
Drainage problems also exist at every intersection with Interlachen
Boulevard. Regrading of these intersections will be addressed during final
design.
IMPROVEMENT: This project includes both reclaiming the roadway and also adding concrete
curb and gutter to areas where curb and gutter currently do not exist.
Reclaiming the existing bituminous is a process that grinds up the existing
roadway, and regrades the road bed. Then any excess material is removed
and the roadway will be repaved with a two and one -half to three inch
bituminous pavement. Concrete curb and gutter will be placed along Bedford
Avenue and one block of Oxford Avenue. Utilities such as water and sanitary
services will be analyzed during the final design to determine if any of the
services need to be replaced. An analysis of the storm sewer system will
also be completed during the final design to see if any of homes identified
with sump pumps can be accommodated with a storm sewer connection.
The intersection of Bedford Avenue and West 52nd Street will also need to be
analyzed for storm sewer. Currently surface water at this intersection travels
overland to the southwest and down a very steep grade to a pond located
north of Edina Villa Apartments.
Corner of West 52nd Street and Bedford Avenue
The initial sump pump survey indicated that a number of homes in this
neighborhood have existing sump pumps. City staff will analyze extending
the existing storm sewer system to provide underground stubs to
accommodate these homes.
A neighborhood informational packet was sent to the homeowners and an
informational meeting was also held to gather data and answer any
questions the homeowners had. Seven residents attended this informational
meeting. See attached informational packet.
Feasibility Study
Brookside Heights Neighborhood.
April 5, 1999
Page 4
1 11111100 ' 11 1 ■
Homes with sump pumps
RIGHT -OF -WAY: Adequate right -of -way exists.
FEASIBILITY: This project is feasible from an engineering / city standpoint.
EASEMENTS: No additional easements will be required.
COMPLETION: 1999 Construction Season (June- August)
ASSESSMENTS: Two different special assessments will be assessed depending upon the
addition of concrete curb and gutter. The special assessment for
reclaiming the pavement only will be approximately $1,300 per
assessable lot or unit and will be levied against all of the residents along
Oxford Avenue from Interlachen Boulevard to end of cul -de -sac, Bedford
Avenue, William Avenue, and Hankerson Avenue South from Interlachen
Boulevard to West 52nd Street, West 51St Street from Oxford Avenue to
Hankerson Avenue South, West 52nd Street from Bedford Avenue to
Hankerson Avenue South, Grandview Lane, and 53rd Street West from
Grandview Lane to Vernon Avenue. The twin homes located along
- Grandview Lane will be assessed per each unit. A special assessment for
the addition of concrete curb and gutter will be approximately $700 per
assessable lot and will be added to the $1300 reclaiming portion for a
total of $2,100 per assessable lot for all residents along Bedford Avenue
between Interlachen Boulevard and West 52nd Street and Oxford Avenue
between Interlachen Boulevard and West 51St Street. The residences of
5215, 5221, 5237, 5313, and 5321 Interlachen Boulevard abut either Oxford,
Bedford, William, or Hankerson Avenues with their side yards, therefore
these residences would be assessed 1/3 of the per unit cost for the
reclaiming cost and -or the addition of curb and gutter.
Feasibility Study
Brookside Heights Neighborhood
April 5, 1999
Page 5
PROJECT COSTS: The total estimated construction cost for reclaiming pavement process
is $164,000. The estimated construction cost does not include utility
upgrades. Any utility upgrades will be funded through the respective utility
fund. The estimated project cost is $203,000, which includes indirect costs
of 22.5 %, including engineering, clerical, and finance costs. The additional
estimated construction cost for adding concrete curb & gutter is
$46,000. The estimated project cost is $57,000, which includes indirect
costs of 22.5 %, including engineering, clerical, and finance costs. Funding
for the entire project will be from a combination of special assessment and
utility funds. See attached summary of the Project Cost Estimate.
PROJECT SCHEDULE: The following schedule is feasible from an Engineering standpoint:
Council Orders Public Hearing .............. ..........................April 5, 1999
Receive Feasibility Report ..................... ..........................April 5,1999
Public Hearing ............................... ............................May 3, 1999
Bid Opening ................. ............................... .............June 10, 1999
Award Contract .............................. ...........................June 15, 1999
Begin Construction ............................... ..................End- June,1999
Complete Construction ...................... .....................September, 1999
9tNa, �r
o e �t, SURVEY
a0 CITY OF EDINA
The City of Edina's Public Works Staff has determined that your roadway is at a point where additional
surface treatments or straight asphalt overlays would not be cost effective. The Engineering staff is
proposing a full depth reclamation method for your street. This technique is approximately one -half the cost
of traditional reconstruction methods and causes considerably less disruption during construction. This
method involves grinding -up the existing roadway pavement then regrading and paving the street. This
project could be constructed during the summer of 1999, with the public hearing process being held this
winter. More information will follow regarding costs, public hearing schedules, etc.
The majority of the neighborhood does not have concrete curb and gutter. Installation of concrete curb and
gutter benefits the surface water drainage and the structural integrity of a roadway. The Engineering staff is
requesting your input regarding the installation of curb and gutters along your street. Please complete the
following survey and return it in the enclosed stamped envelope by November 6th. Please contact
Wayne Houle at 826 -0443 if you have any questions.
Which curb & gutter system, if any, do you prefer? Please check one box.
0
Bulkhead Curb and Gutter:
• Best control of surface water runoff
• Defines yard / roadway.
• Most expensive (potentially adds $800 to $1000 per assessable lot)
❑ Surmountable Curb and Gutter:
• Controls surface water runoff
• Defines yard / roadway.
• Lower cost (potentially adds $600 to $800 per assessable lot)
❑ No curb or gutter: Existing condition.
• Least control of surface water runoff
• No yard / roadway definition.
• Prone to reducing structural strength of edge of roadway.
OTHER COMMENTS:
Address:
City of Edina
February 23, 1999
Brookside Heights Neighborhood Area Residents
Edina, MN
Re: Resident Letter No. 1
Informational Meeting Announcement
...----Brookside - Heights_ Roadway _Improvements
City of Edina
Dear Resident:
As many of you know the City of Edina has initiated the process for roadway improvements for
your neighborhood. The City of Edina is hosting an Informational Meeting regarding this
project to be held on Tuesday, March 16 at Arneson Acres Park, lower level meeting
room, at 8:00 PM. Arneson Acres is located at 4711 West 70th Street, two blocks east of Hwy
100.
The meeting format will. consist of a short presentation followed by an informal question and
answer session. The presentation will cover scope of work and average assessment costs. If
you cannot attend this meeting please contact me at 826 -0443 and I will answer any questions
you may have.
Sincerely,
Wayne D. Houle, PE
Assistant City Engineer
Attachment
c: File
City Hall (612) 927 -8861
4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 826 -0390
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 826 -0379
. ■�, �� ill i�",Io„� ;ii:
WEMENT
& GUTTER
March 4, 1999
City of Edifia
Re: Resident Letter No. 2
Project Information
Brookside Heights Neighborhood Roadway Improvements
Dear Brookside Heights Neighborhood Area Residents:
Due to the interest in this project I am sending ,out this informational letter describing the project, the
potential schedule, and potential assessments::.
This project will consist of reclaiming: the roadway as shown on the attached Reclaiming Process Sheet.
The results of the fall survey indicated a desire for concrete curb and gutters where they currently do not
exist. Engineering staff will also look at any surface drainage problems that might exist and ways to help
alleviate these problems. The construction for this project should take approximately three to eight
weeks depending on the extent of work to be completed (utility work generally will take longer than just
repaving).
The proposed preliminary schedule is as follows:
Informational Meeting..... March 16, 1999 Complete Construction ...... August / September, 1999
Public Hearing ........... End of April, 1999 Final Assessment Hearing ......... Fall of 1999 or 2000
Begin Construction ....... June / July, 1999
Please keep in mind that this project is "proposed only" until the City Council orders. it at a Public Hearing.
Also, you will be notified of the public hearing date at least ten days prior to the.public hearing.
This project is setup with two different per lot preliminary assessment rates. One rate is for areas that will
have the pavement reclaimed only, the other is for areas proposed to receive new concrete curb and
gutter along with pavement reclaiming. Any lots that are adjacent to, but do not front the proposed
reclaimed roadway will be assessed at one -third the cost. Assessments are typically added to the tax roll
after the final assessment hearing and can be spread -out over 10 years. Proposed Assessments per lot
for this project are ±$1,300 for pavement reclaiming areas only and ±$2,100 for pavement reclaiming
areas plus new concrete. curb and gutters. Any utility work will be charged to the City Utility Fund.
One most frequently asked question is "Why don't regular taxes cover a project such as this ? ": Money
for roadways from the City's General Fund can only be spent on general maintenance of City roadways
such as cracksealing and sealcoating. Minnesota State Law only permits cities to establish Utility Funds
to maintain and upgrade water and sewers systems. Roadways. and sidewalks are not yet included
therefor improvements for these types of projects need to be assessed.
It is to be hoped that this letter will answer most questions you might have. This information will be
reiterated at the informational meeting, if you have any additional questions or input and can not make it
to this meeting please call me at 826 -0443.
Sincer ly,
Wayne D. Houle, PE
_ Assistant City Fn9ineer
City Hall (612) 927 -8861
4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 826 -0390
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 826 -0379
STREET RECLAIMING PROCESS
Often times a roadway may contain many patches and a lot of cracking, but may not be at a point of total
3construction. Street reclaiming is a process that can be applied to these roadways. Reclaiming as
shown below is a process where a grinding machine will grind up the existing roadway using all portions of
the existing roadway. The roadway is graded and compacted then repaved. Disturbances to driveways,
yards and landscaping for areas that are not adding concrete curb and gutters is minimal and the City will
repair all disturbances that are associated with the project. Disturbances to driveways, yards and
landscaping for areas that are adding concrete curb and gutters will be affected depending on the layout of
the new curb and gutter; however the City will also repair any disturbances that are associated with the
project. Reclaiming is typically about 1/3 the cost of reconstructing the roadway.
Streets before the reclaiming process.
Reclaiming (grinding) Machine
New Pavement without curb and gutter.
New pavement with curb and gutter.
SUMMARY OF COST ANALYSIS
BROOKSIDE HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOOD
CITY OF EDINA
SCHEDULE A:
RECLAIM PAVEMENT PROCESS
Subtotal Construction Cost $ 149,000
10% Contingency $ 15,000
Total Construction Cost $ 164,000
15% Engineering & Clerical $ 25,000
Total Construction Cost $ 189,000
7.5% Finance $ 14,000
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST (A) $ 203,000
NOTE: Does not include any utility costs.
SCHEDULE B:
ADDITIONAL CURB & GUTTER
Subtotal Construction Cost
42,000
10% Contingency $ 4,000
Total Construction Cost $ 46,000
15% Engineering & Clerical $ 7,000
Total Construction Cost $ 53,000
7.5% Finance $ 4,000
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST (B) $ 57,000
GAMPROV/A184/MISC/QUANTITIES -A184 Cost EsUmateAs Pagel 7:21 PM3/31/99
A.
FEASIBILITY STUDY- A185
o G ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
ay CITY OF EDINA
STREET IMPROVEMENTS
SKYLINE DRIVE & BLOSSOM COURT
.APRIL 5, 1999
LOCATION: Skyline Drive from Interlachen Boulevard to end of cul -de -sac and Blossom
Court from Skyline Drive to end of cul -de -sac.
INITIATION & ISSUES:
111111112111I121111�i
This project was staff initiated by the Edina Engineering Department as part
of the neighborhood street reconstruction program. The street department
requested that these streets be reconstructed due to the poor pavement
condition.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: The existing roadway was constructed in 1965 and consists of a 24 foot to 28
foot wide bituminous rural section. The pavement is in relatively poor
condition with major block cracking and numerous patches throughout. This
roadway appears to be at the end of its useful life; meaning overlaying or
sealcoating this pavement would not be feasible.
Feasibility Study
Skyline Drive / Blossom Court
April 5, 1999
Page 2
Pavement condition on Skyline Drive
IMPROVEMENT: This project involves reclaiming the existing bituminous, a process that grinds up the
existing roadway, regrading the roadway bed, removing any excess material, and
repaving the roadway with a two and one -half to three inch bituminous pavement. A
neighborhood survey was sent to all residents last fall asking for their opinion of
installing concrete curb and gutter, see attached survey. The majority of the
neighbors responding, seven out of eleven, do not prefer to have concrete curb and
gutter installed at this time. A neighborhood informational packet was sent to the
owners and an informational meeting was also held, see attached informational
packet. Input from the eight neighbors attending included residents from Blossom
Court not wanting the project at this time and comments relating to the drainage of
the roadway at the most southerly and westerly cul -de -sac. The storm sewer catch
basin at the southerly end of Skyline Drive will need to be addressed through the
final design process for a possible rebuild of the catch basin. Initial survey of the
neighborhood revealed a sump pump at 5020 and 5126 Skyline Drive. City staff will
investigate the need for a subsurface drainage system for these two residences.
Feasibility Study
Skyline Drive / Blossom Court
April 5, 1999
Page 3
Storm Sewer at Skyline Drive cul -de -sac.
RIGHT -OF -WAY: Adequate right -of -way exists.
FEASIBILITY: This project is feasible from an engineering / city standpoint.
EASEMENTS: No additional easements will be required.
COMPLETION: 1999 Construction Season (June- August)
ASSESSMENTS: A special assessment of approximately $2,900 per assessable lot will be
levied against the residents along Skyline Drive and Blossom Court. The
residences of 5501 and 5419 Interlachen Boulevard abut Skyline Drive with
their side yards, therefore these residences would be assessed 1/3 of the
per unit cost.
PROJECT COSTS: The total estimated construction cost is $60,000. The estimated
construction cost does not include storm sewer upgrades. Any storm sewer
upgrades will be funded through the stormwater utility fund. The estimated
project cost is $74,000, which includes indirect costs of 22.5 %, including
engineering, clerical, and finance costs. Funding for the entire project will be
from a combination of special assessment and stormwater utility. See
attached summary of the Project Cost Estimate.
Feasibility Study
Skyline Drive / Blossom Court
April 5, 1999
Page 4
PROJECT SCHEDULE: The following schedule is feasible from an Engineering standpoint:
Council Orders Public Hearing
.............. ..........................April 5, 1999
Receive Feasibility Report ....................
..........................April 5, 1999
Public Hearing ................. .. ...............................
...........May 3, 1999
Bid Opening ... ...............................
...........................June 10, 1999
Award Contract ..............................
...........................June 15, 1999
Begin Construction.. .. .. ............................
..................End- June,1999
Complete Construction ........................
........................August, 1999
1,1 A,
ow a � SURVEY
N'o ay CITY OF EDINA
• ,� i�n�e T69
The City of Edina's Public Works Staff has determined that your roadway is at a point where additional
surface treatments or straight asphalt overlays would not be cost effective. The Engineering staff is
proposing a full depth reclamation method for your street. This technique is approximately one -half the cost
of traditional reconstruction methods and causes considerably less disruption during construction. This
method involves grinding -up the existing roadway pavement then regrading and paving the street. This
project could be constructed during the summer of 1999, with the public hearing process being held this
winter. More information will follow regarding costs, public hearing schedules, etc.
The majority of the neighborhood does not have concrete curb and gutter. Installation of concrete curb and
gutter benefits the surface water drainage and the structural integrity of a roadway. The Engineering staff is
requesting your input regarding the installation of curb and gutters along your street. Please complete the
following survey and return it in the enclosed stamped envelope by November 6th. Please contact
Wayne Houle at 826 -0443 if you have any questions.
Which curb & gutter system, if any, do you prefer? Please check one box.
El
Bulkhead Curb and Gutter:
• Best control of surface water runoff
• Defines yard / roadway.
• Most expensive (potentially adds $800 to $1000 per assessable lot)
❑ Surmountable Curb and Gutter:
IN Controls surface water runoff
• Defines yard / roadway.
• Lower cost (potentially adds $600 to $800 per assessable lot)
❑ No curb or gutter: Existing condition.
• Least control of surface water runoff
• No yard / roadway definition.
• Prone to reducing structural strength of edge of roadway.
OTHER COMMENTS:
Address:
City of Edina
February 23, 1999
Skyline Drive and Blossom Court Area Residents
Edina, MN
Re: Resident Letter No. 1
Informational Meeting Announcement
Skyline Drive and Blossom Court Roadway Improvements
City of Edina
Dear Resident:
As many of you know the City of Edina has initiated the process for roadway improvements for
your neighborhood. The City of Edina is hosting an Informational Meeting regarding this
project to be held on Tuesday, March 16 at Arneson Acres Park, lower level meeting
room, at 7:00 PM. Arneson Acres is located at 4711 West 70t. h Street, two blocks east of Hwy
100.
The meeting format will consist of a short presentation followed by an informal question and
answer session. The presentation will cover scope of work and average assessment costs. If
you cannot attend this meeting please contact me at 826 -0443 and I will answer any questions
you may have.
Sincerely,
Wayne D. Houle, PE
Assistant City Engineer
Attachment
c: File
City Hall (612) 927 -8861
4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 826 -0390
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 826 -0379
IMPROVEMENT LOCATION: Skyline Drive and Blossom Court
,
Issza I I 5524 s.52e 1
.... ......................... ....... • --------------------------------------------
L I. I 540a I 5400 5374 1 370 J 5332 1 532P 1 5324
501
501
51?
502
502
503
E.--
................. .................. . ..�
51C
510
510
511
511
512-
512
5121
513;
513
5141
51a.
March 4, 1999
City of Edina
Re: Resident Letter No. 2
Project Information
Skyline Drive and Blossom Court Roadway Improvements
Dear Skyline Drive and Blossom Court Area Residents:
Due to the interest in this project I am sending out this informational letter describing the project, the
potential. schedule, and potential assessments.
This project will consist of reclaiming the roadway as shown on the attached Reclaiming Process Sheet.
No concrete curb and gutters will be proposed for this neighborhood due to the curb and gutter surveys
that were returned last fall. Engineering staff will also look at any surface drainage problems that might
exist and ways to help alleviate these problems. The construction for this project should take
approximately three to eight weeks depending on the extent of work to be completed (utility work
generally will take longer than just repaving).
The`proposed preliminary schedule is as follows:
Informational Meeting...... March 16, 1999 Complete Construction ...... August / September, 1999
Public Hearing ............ End -of April, 1999 Final Assessment Hearing ......... Fall of 1999 or 2000
Begin Construction ......... June / July,1999
Please keep in mind that this project is "proposed only" until the City Council orders it at a Public Hearing.
Also, you will be notified of the public hearing date at least ten days prior to the public hearing.
The assessments for this project are preliminarily setup on a per lot basis, meaning all lots will be
assessed equally. Any lots that are adjacent to, but do not front the proposed reclaimed roadway will be
assessed at one -third the cost. Assessments are typically added to the tax roll after the final assessment
hearing and can be spread -out over 10 years. Proposed Assessments for this project are ±$2,900 per lot
and includes only the pavement reclaiming portion, any utility work will be charged to the City Utility Fund.
One most frequently asked question is "Why don't regular taxes cover a project such as this ? ": Money
for roadways from the City's General Fund can only be spent on general maintenance of City roadways
such as cracksealing and sealcoating. Minnesota State Law only permits cities to establish Utility Funds
to maintain and upgrade water and sewers systems. Roadways and sidewalks are not yet included
therefor improvements for these types of projects need to be assessed.
It is to be hoped that this letter will answer most questions you might have. This information will be
reiterated at the informational meeting, if you have any additional questions or input and can not make it
to this meeting please call me at 826 -0443.
Sincerely,
.Wayne D. Houle, PE
Assistant City Engineer
City Hall (612) 927 -8861
4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 826 -0390
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 826 -0379
STREET RECLAIMING PROCESS
Often times a roadway may contain many patches and a lot of cracking, but may not be at a point of total
3construction. Street reclaiming is a process that can be applied to these roadways. Reclaiming as
shown below is a process where a grinding machine will grind up the existing roadway using all portions of
the existing roadway. The roadway is graded and compacted then repaved. Disturbances to driveways,
yards and landscaping for areas that are not adding concrete curb and gutters is minimal and the City will
repair all disturbances that are associated with the project. Disturbances to driveways, yards and
landscaping for areas that are adding concrete curb and gutters will be affected depending on the layout of
the new curb and gutter; however the City will also repair any disturbances that are associated with the
project. Reclaiming is typically about 1/3 the cost of reconstructing the roadway.
Streets before the reclaiming process.
Reclaiming (grinding) Machine
New Pavement without curb and gutter. New pavement with curb and gutter.
SUMMARY OF COST ANALYSIS
SKYLINE DRIVE and BLOSSOM COURT PAVEMENT RECLAIMING
CITY OF EDINA
Subtotal Construction Cost $ 54,000
10% Contingency $ 5,000
Total Construction Cost $ 60,000
15% Engineering & Clerical $ 9,000
Total Construction Cost $ 69,000
7.5% Finance $ 5,000
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST $ 74,000
NOTE: Does not include any utility costs.
GAMPROV/A185/MISC /QUANTITIES -A185 Cost Estimate.xls Pagel 6:32 AM4/1/99
,�
w9 ^j� FEASIBILITY STUDY - A186
o e 71 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
�° CITY OF EDINA
STREET IMPROVEMENTS
HIGHLANDS PARK NEIGHBORHOOD
APRIL 5, 1999
LOCATION: Dundee Road from Northwood Drive to Ayrshire Boulevard, Mirror Lakes
Drive from Interlachen Boulevard to Ayrshire Boulevard, Chantrey Road and
Glengarry Parkway from Northwood Drive to Ayrshire Boulevard, Doncaster
Way from Highland Park Shelter to Vernon Avenue, and Merritt Circle, as
shown below in bold.
Project Location
INITIATION & ISSUES: This project was staff initiated by the Edina Engineering Department as part
of the neighborhood street reconstruction program. The street department
requested that these streets be reconstructed due to the poor pavement
condition.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: The existing roadways were constructed during the years of 1957 to 1962.
The roadways in this neighborhood typically consist of a 28 to 30 foot wide
bituminous rural section with some existing concrete curb & gutter (Ayrshire
Boulevard and northerly end of Doncaster Way). The pavement condition
varies throughout the neighborhood, but generally it is in relatively poor
condition.
Street grades within the neighborhood vary from flat -level areas along
Dundee Road to Glengarry Parkway, to steeper grades along the north end
of Mirror Lakes Drive and also the south end of Doncaster Way. The level
Feasibility Study
Highlands Park Neighborhood
April 5, 1999
Page 2
areas are showing signs of major distress such as patches and various
cracking mainly due to the age and poor drainage of the roadway. The
steeper areas also indicate age cracking with major edge patching that is
due to surface runoff. Concrete curb and gutter exists only along Ayrshire
Boulevard. The pavement throughout this neighborhood appears to be at the
end of its useful life; overlaying or sealcoating this pavement would not be
feasible.
Storm sewer for this area exists only adjacent to Highland Park. The initial
sump pump surveys indicate a number of homes with sump pumps scattered
throughout the neighborhood.
Pavement Condition along Doncaster Way
Pavement Condition Mirror Lakes Drive & Northwood Road
IMPROVEMENT: This project involves reclaiming the existing bituminous pavement, a process
that grinds up the existing roadways, regrades the road bed, removes all
Feasibility Study
Highlands Park Neighborhood
April 5, 1999
Page 3
excess material and repaves the roadways with a two and one -half to three
inch bituminous pavement. Any existing curb and gutter that needs
replacement will be replaced at this time. A neighborhood survey was sent
last fall to all residents who do not have existing concrete curb and gutter
asking for their opinion of installing concrete curb and gutter, see attached
copy of survey. The majority of the neighbors responding, 25 out of 43, do
not prefer to have concrete curb and gutter installed at this time. A second
survey was sent at the request of residents attending the informational
meeting, to these same residents verifying the first survey. The majority of
the neighbors responding, 53 out of 94, do not prefer to have concrete curb
and gutter installed at this time. Merritt Circle is the only individual street that
has a majority in favor of curb & gutter; staff will continue to review these
results.
The initial sump survey indicated that a number of homes in this
neighborhood have existing sump pumps. City staff will analyze extending
the existing storm sewer system that will provide an underground stub to
accommodate these homes.
�■ �■ ter' a sM
■ ■M .v i
Homes with sump pumps
A neighborhood informational packet was- sent to these residents and an
informational meeting was also held to gather data and answer any
questions the homeowners had. Input from over 40 residents attending
included information regarding drainage around Highlands Park, mostly on
the easterly side. Drainage problems at the intersection of Doncaster Way
Feasibility Study
Highlands Park Neighborhood
April 5, 1999
Page 4
and Ayrshire Boulevard was a major concern of the residents. Two resident
letters are also attached to this report.
RIGHT -OF -WAY: Adequate right -of -way exists.
FEASIBILITY: This project is feasible from an engineering / city standpoint.
EASEMENTS: No additional easements will be required.
COMPLETION: 1999 Construction Season (June- August)
ASSESSMENTS: A special assessment of approximately $2,500 to $3,000 per assessable
lot will be levied against the residents along Dundee Road from Northwood
Drive to Ayrshire Boulevard, Mirror Lakes Drive from Interlachen Boulevard
to Ayrshire Boulevard, Chantrey Road and Glengarry Parkway from
Northwood Drive to Ayrshire Boulevard, Doncaster Way from Highland Park
Shelter to Vernon Avenue, and Merritt Circle. The range of the assessment
is contributed to various methods of calculating the park and school
property's assessment shares, a more accurate assessment number will be
given at the Public Hearing. The residents at 5501 Dundee, 5500 & 5501
Mirror Lakes Drive, 5500 & 5501 Chantrey Road, 5500 & 5501 Glengarry
Parkway, and 5605 Ayrshire Boulevard abut the project area with their side
yards; therefor these residences will be assessed 1/3 of the per unit cost.
See figure below.
Assessment Costs per lot
PROJECT COSTS: The total estimated construction cost is $394,000. The estimated
construction cost does not include storm sewer or utility upgrades. Utility
N
'
COST PER
ASSESSABLE LOT
■
V3 COST
- FULL COST
Assessment Costs per lot
PROJECT COSTS: The total estimated construction cost is $394,000. The estimated
construction cost does not include storm sewer or utility upgrades. Utility
Feasibility Study
Highlands Park Neighborhood
April 5, 1999
Page 5
upgrades will be funded through their respective utility fund. The estimated
project cost is $487,000, which includes indirect costs of 22.5 %, which
includes engineering, clerical, and finance costs. Funding for the entire
project will be from a combination of special assessment and utility funds.
See attached summary of the Project Cost Estimate.
PROJECT SCHEDULE: The following schedule is feasible from an Engineering standpoint:
Council Orders Public Hearing ............... .........................April 5, 1999
Receive Feasibility Report .................... ..........................April 5,1999
Public Hearing .. ............................... ............................May 3, 1999
Bid Opening . ............................... ...........................June 10, 1999
Award Contract ............................ ...........................June 15, 1999
Begin Construction . ............................... ..................End- June,1999
Complete Construction ...................... .....................September, 1999
9iNA' �r
ow a SURVEY
U' y CITY OF EDINA
v a
The City of Edina's Public Works Staff has determined that your roadway is at a point where additional
surface treatments or straight asphalt overlays would not be cost effective. The Engineering staff is
proposing a full depth reclamation method for your street. This technique is approximately one -half the cost
of traditional reconstruction methods and causes considerably less disruption during construction. This
method involves grinding -up the existing roadway pavement then regrading and paving the street. This
project could be constructed during the summer of 1999, with the public hearing process being held this
winter. More information will follow regarding costs, public hearing schedules, etc.
The majority of the neighborhood does not have concrete curb and gutter. Installation of concrete curb and
gutter benefits the surface water drainage and the structural integrity of a roadway. The Engineering staff is
requesting your input regarding the installation of curb and gutters along your street. Please complete the
following survey and return it in the enclosed stamped envelope by November 6th. Please contact
Wayne Houle at 826 -0443 if you have any questions.
Which curb & gutter system, if any, do you prefer? Please check one box.
Bulkhead Curb and Gutter:
• Best control of surface water runoff
• Defines yard / roadway.
• Most expensive (potentially adds $800 to $1000 per assessable lot)
❑ Surmountable Curb and Gutter:
• Controls surface water runoff
• Defines yard / roadway.
IN Lower cost (potentially adds $600 to $800 per assessable lot)
❑ No curb or gutter: Existing condition.
• Least control of surface water runoff
• No yard / roadway definition.
• Prone to reducing structural strength of edge of roadway.
OTHER COMMENTS:
Address:
City of Edina
February 23, 1999
Highlands Park Neighborhood'Area Residents
Edina, MN
Re: Resident Letter No. 1
Informational Meeting Announcement
Highlands -Park Neighborhood Roadway Improvements -
City of Edina
Dear Resident:
As many of you know the City of Edina has initiated the process for roadway improvements for
your neighborhood. The City of Edina is hosting an Informational Meeting regarding this
project to be held on Tuesday, March 16 at Arneson Acres Park, lower level meeting
room, at 7:00 PM. Arneson Acres is located at 4711 West 70th Street, two blocks east of Hwy
100.
The meeting format will consist of a short presentation followed by an informal question and
answer session. The presentation will cover scope of work and average assessment costs. If
you cannot attend this meeting please contact me at 826 -0443 and I will answer any questions
you may have.
Sincerely,
aj"
Wayne D. Houle, PE
Assistant City Engineer
Attachment
c: File
City Hall (612) 927 -8861
4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 826 -0390
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 826 -0379
IMPROVEMENT LOCATION: HIGHLANDS PARK_ NEIGHBORHOOD
No
MEN
NOR
i
f
IN oom- .. ■. lws ON
�S
March 4, 1999 City Of Edina
Re: Resident Letter No. 2
Project Information
Highlands Park Neighborhood Roadway Improvements
Dear Highlands Park Neighborhood Area Residents:
Due to the interest in this project I am sending out this informational letter describing the project, the
potential schedule, and potential assessments.
This project will consist of reclaiming the roadway as shown on the attached Reclaiming Process Sheet.
No concrete curb and gutters will be proposed for this neighborhood due to the curb and gutter surveys
that were returned last fall. Engineering staff will also look at any surface drainage problems that might
exist and ways to help alleviate these. problems. The construction for this project should take
approximately three to eight weeks depending on the extent of work to be completed (utility work
generally will take longer than just repaving).
The proposed preliminary schedule is as follows:
Informational Meeting...... March 16, 1999 Complete Construction ...... August / September, 1999
Public Hearing ............ End of April, 1999 Final Assessment Hearing ......... Fall.of 1999 or 2000
Begin Construction ......... June / July, 1999
Please keep in mind that this project is "proposed only" until the City Council orders it at a Public Hearing.
Also, you will be notified of the public hearing date at least ten days prior to the public hearing.
The assessments for this project are preliminarily ,setup on a per lot basis, meaning all lots will be
assessed equally. Any lots that are adjacent to, but do. hot front,the proposed reclaimed roadway will be
assessed at one -third the cost. Assessments are typically added to the tax roll after the final assessment
hearing and can be spread -out over 10 years. Proposed Assessments for this project are ±$3,400 per lot
and includes only the pavement reclaiming portion,aany utility work will be charged'to the City Utility Fund.
One most frequently asked question is "Why don't regular taxes cover a project such as this ? ": Money
for roadways from the City's General Fund can only be spent on general maintenance of City roadways
such as cracksealing and sealcoating. Minnesota State Law only permits cities to establish Utility Funds
to maintain and upgrade water and sewers systems. Roadways and sidewalks are not yet included
therefor improvements for these types of projects need to be assessed.
It is to be hoped that this letter will answer most questions you might have. This information will be
reiterated at the informational meeting, if you have any additional questions or input and can not make it
to this meeting please call me at 826 -0443. .
Sincerely,
Wayne D. Houle, PE
Assistant City Engineer
.City Hall (612) 927 -8861
4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 826 -0390
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 826 -0379
STREET RECLAIMING PROCESS
Often times a roadway may contain many patches and a lot of cracking, but may not be at a point of total
econstruction. Street reclaiming is a process that can be applied to these roadways. Reclaiming as
shown below is a process where a grinding machine will grind up the existing roadway using all portions of
the existing roadway. The roadway is graded and compacted then repaved. Disturbances to driveways,
yards and landscaping for areas that are not adding concrete curb and gutters is minimal and the City will
repair all disturbances that are associated with the project. Disturbances to driveways, yards and
landscaping for areas that are adding concrete curb and gutters will be affected depending on the layout of
the new curb and gutter; however the City will also repair any disturbances that are associated with the
project. Reclaiming is typically about 1/3 the cost of reconstructing the roadway.
Streets before the reclaiming process.
Reclaiming (grinding) Machine
New Pavement without curb and gutter. New pavement with curb and gutter.
9jNA �Ij
o� e mot, RE- SURVEY
cn
.�y HIGHLANDS PARK AREA
PAVEMENT RECLAIMING PROJECT
CITY OF EDINA
As many of you know the Edina Engineering Staff conducted a neighborhood informational
meeting on March 16. About half of the attending residents requested that the neighborhood be
resurveyed for installation of curb and gutters. I've attached a postcard survey regarding this
issue. Please return this survey as soon as possible but no later than March 25. Also, please
include your street and house number for recording these results.
I've also reattached information on the different types of concrete curb and gutters. The results of
this survey will be included with the notice for Public Hearing.
Please contact Wayne Houle at 826 -0443 if you have any questions.
Bulkhead Curb and Gutter:
• Best control of surface water runoff
• Defines yard / roadway.
• Most expensive (potentially adds $800 to $1100 per assessable lot)
Surmountable Curb and Gutter:
• Controls surface water runoff
• Defines yard / roadway.
• Lower cost (potentially adds $600 to $800 per assessable lot)
SUMMARY OF COST ANALYSIS
MIRROR LAKES / HIGHLAND LAKE PAVEMENT RECLAIMING
CITY OF EDINA
Subtotal Construction Cost $ 391,000
10% Contingency $ 2,000
Total Construction Cost $ 394,000
15% Engineering & Clerical $ 59,000
Total Construction Cost $ 453,000
7.5% Finance $ 34,000
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST $ 487,000
NOTE: Does not include any utility costs.
GAMPROWA186/MISC/QUANTITIES -A186 Cost Estimate.xis Pagel 6:44 AM4/1/99
93/16/1999 14:32 6129223574
March 16, 1999
K G ANDERSON
KENNETH p, ANDERSON
OaOO DONCASTER WAY
MINNEAPOU$,MINNESOTA 60436
10181 920 .0793
PAGE 01
We moved into 5209 Doncaster Way in May of 1958. We have continued
to live at this address and have been able to observe, over the
many years, our neighborhood grow and develop into a community
we are still proud to be a part of.
Apparently other early settlers in our community are similarly
comfortable: witness the.fact that many who originally built
their homes (as we did) are still happy campers. In addition,
their children are eagerly returning to the home
territory where they grew up so they can raise their children
under the same comforts, safety, school systems, etc., etc., that
their parents and our village provided for them over the years.
As communities grow and age, there are improvements that must
be addressed. This meeting has been called to bring attention
to the several problems that have developed.
We would like to go on record, at this meeting,tonight, to
express our thoughts regarding the improvements that would
benefit (not only us) but that part of the community which is being
considered for redevelopment.
DRAINAGE: It has been a major problem.
After every rainfall a lake forms at the T- crossing of Doncaster Way
and Croyden Vane. We finally and laughingly (out of sheer desperation)
call it "Lake Doncaster." The drainage originally provided for the
runoff was so inadequate to start with so that, with just a few
leaves and /or grass clippings moving along all the streets that drain
into this one small, inadequate point, we have total back -up - -thus grows
"Lake Doncaster!" We are thankful for our neighbor who dons hip boots,
gets rake, shovel and what -ever is necessary (winter or summer!) to open
a path for the water to make its way into the lake.
Many years ago the City installed a sluiceway in the parking
lot on Doncaster Way that, supposedly, would take care of
the.runoff. it was quickly learned that the sluiceway was
far too high above the natural drainage level to carry any water away.
Subsequently, that first sluiceway was jackhammered out and
a second one installed at what was probably a lower level and
would be adequate to handle run -off. Such was not to be the
case! The new sluice -way was as ineffective as the first
one and remains as ineffective to this day!
Now is the time for thi problem to be re- addressed and corrected.
Thank you,
Kenneth G. and Rosemary R. And n
March 19,1999
Wayne Houle
City of Edina
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Mr. Houle:
SUBJECT: HIGHLANDS PARK AREA PAVEMENT RECLAIMING PROJECT
We do NOT support the reclaiming project for Chantrey Road. As I drive through the city,
there are many roads in Edina in worse shape than Chantrey. I have heard the argument "all
or none" and disagree with your thinking. Chantrey Road does not need $150,000.00 of
repairs!
Sincerely,
Dan & Liz Brunsvold
5401 CHANTREY ROAD
EDINA, MN 55436
SUMMARY OF COST ANALYSIS
MIRROR LAKES / HIGHLAND LAKE PAVEMENT RECLAIMING
CITY OF EDINA
Subtotal Construction Cost $ 391,000
10% Contingency $ 2,000
Total Construction Cost $ 394,000
15% Engineering & Clerical $ 59,000
Total Construction Cost $ 453,000
7.5% Finance $ 34,000
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST $ 487,000
NOTE: Does not include any utility costs.
GAMPROWA186/MISC/QUANTITIES -A186 Cost EstimateAs Pagel 6:44 AM4/1/99
93/16/1999 14:32 6129223574
March 16, 1999
K G ANDERSON
KENNETH O. ANDERSON
5200 OONCASTER WAY
MINNEAPOUS,MINNESOU 5O434
1819► 990 -0793
PAGE 01
We moved into 5209 Doncaster Way in May of 1958. We have continued
to live at this address and have been able to observe, over the.
many years, our neighborhood grow and develop into a community
we are still proud to be a part of.
Apparently other early settlers in our community are similarly
comfortable: witness the.fact that many who originally built
their homes (as we did) are still happy campers. In addition,
their children are eagerly returning to the home
territory where they grew up so they can raise their children
under the same comforts, safety, school systems, etc., etc., that
their parents and our village provided for them over the years.
As communities grow and age, there are improvements that must
be addressed. This meeting has been called to bring attention
to the several problems that have developed.
We would like to go on record, at this meeting,tonight, to
express our thoughts regarding the improvements that would
benefit (not only us) but that part of the community which is being
considered for redevelopment.
DRAINAGE: It has been a major problem.
After every rainfall a lake forms at the T- crossing of Doncaster Way
and Croyden Vane. We finally and laughingly (out of sheer desperation)
call it "Lake Doncaster." The drainage originally provided for the
runoff was so inadequate to start with so that, with just a few
leaves and /or grass clippings moving along all the streets that drain
into this one small, inadequate point, we have total back -up - -thus grows
"Lake Doncaster!" We are thankful for our neighbor who dons hip boots,
gets rake, shovel and what -ever is necessary (winter or summer!) to open
a path for the water to make its way into the lake.
Many years ago the City installed a sluiceway in the parking
lot on Doncaster Way that, supposedly, would take care of
the runoff. It was quickly learned that the sluiceway was
far too high above the natural drainage level to carry any water away.
Subsequently, that first sluiceway was jackhammered out and
a second one installed at what was probably a lower level and
would be adequate to handle run -off. Such was not to be the
case! The new sluice -way was as ineffective as the first
one and remains as ineffective to this dayl
Now is the time for thi problem to be re- addressed and corrected.
Thank you,
Kenneth G. and Rosemary R. Ander n
March 19, 1999
Wayne Houle
City of Edina
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Mr. Houle:
SUBJECT: HIGHLANDS PARK AREA PAVEMENT RECLAIMING PROJECT
We do NOT support the reclaiming project for Chantrey Road. As I drive through the city,
there are many roads in Edina in worse shape than Chantrey. I have heard the argument "all
or none" and disagree with your thinking. Chantrey Road does not need $150,000.00 of
repairs!
Sincerely,
Dan & Liz Brunsvold
5401 CHANTREY ROAD
EDINA, MN 55436
4,9A,
o
STREET IMPROVEMENTS
ROSEMARY LANE
ARPIL 5, 1999
LOCATION:
FEASIBILITY STUDY- A187
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF EDINA
Rosemary Lane from Valley View Road to end of cul -de -sac.
12 6629
6633
IQ6701
6708 6704
2 6712 iM1}
o •• }f{�' t`} ,y, }} ` 6700 N
6200 C 6705
LLl 8716
6701
5201
8709 6720 6705
6724 ji 6709 RECLAIMING AREA
6713 •;}
'sl
ROSEMARY LANE
6717 6728 6713
i
6 }}}
ry}
6721 6732 ? 6717
6772 6768 5164 6760
VALLEY VIEW ROAD
660, 6763
6666 �
03 J
W
a 660,
INITIATION & ISSUES: This project was staff initiated by the Edina Engineering Department as part
of the neighborhood street reconstruction program. The street department
requested that this street be reconstructed due to the poor pavement
condition.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: The existing roadway was constructed in 1964 and consist of a 28 foot wide
bituminous urban section. The pavement is in relatively poor condition and
is very brittle with major block cracking throughout. This roadway appears to
be at the end of its useful life; meaning overlaying or seal- coating this
pavement would not be feasible. Some sections of the existing concrete
curb and gutter have settled.
Page 1
Feasibility Study
Rosemary Lane
April 5, 1999
Page 2
Pavement condition on Rosemary Lane
IMPROVEMENT: This project involves reclaiming the existing bituminous, a process that grinds
up the existing roadway, regrading the roadway bed, removing any excess
material, and repaving the roadway with a two and one -half to three inch
bituminous pavement. A neighborhood informational packet was sent to
these homeowners and an open house is scheduled for April 6, any
information gathered from this open house will be presented with the Public
Hearing report.
Failed curb and gutter to be replaced.
Feasibility Study
Rosemary Lane
April 5, 1999
Page 3
RIGHT -OF -WAY:
FEASIBILITY:
EASEMENTS:
COMPLETION:
ASSESSMENTS:
Adequate right -of -way exists.
This project is feasible from an engineering / city standpoint.
No additional easements will be required.
1999 Construction Season (June- August)
A special assessment of approximately $2,200 per assessable lot will be
levied against the residents along Rosemary Lane.
PROJECT COSTS: The total estimated construction cost is $24,500. The estimated
construction cost does not include utility upgrades. Any utility upgrades will
be funded through the respective utility fund. The estimated project cost is
$30,300, which includes indirect costs of 22.5 %, which includes engineering,
clerical, and finance costs. Funding for the entire project will be from a
combination of special assessment and utility funds. See attached summary
of the Project Cost Estimate.
PROJECT SCHEDULE: The following schedule is feasible from an Engineering standpoint:
Council Orders Public Hearing .............. ..........................April 5, 1999
Receive Feasibility Report .................... ..........................April 5, 1999
Public Hearing .. ............................... ............................May 3, 1999
Bid Opening ... ............................... ...........................June 10, 1999
Award Contract .............................. ...........................June 15, 1999
Begin Construction ............................ ......................End -June, 1999
Complete Construction ........................ ........................August, 1999
SUMMARY OF COST ANALYSIS
ROSEMARY LANE
PAVEMENT RECLAIMING
CITY OF EDINA
Subtotal Construction Cost $ 22,300
10% Contingency $ 2,200
Total Construction Cost $ 24,500
15% Engineering & Clerical $ 3,700
Total Construction Cost $ 28,200
7.5% Finance $ 2,100
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST $ 30,300
NOTE: Does not include any utility costs.
GAMPROV/A187/MISC/QUANTITIES -A187 Cost Estimate -As Pagel 7:13 PM3/31/99
9Z1`IA,
ow e SURVEY
a0 CITY OF EDINA
The City of Edina's Public Works Staff has determined that your roadway is at a point where additional
surface treatments or straight asphalt overlays would not be cost effective. The Engineering staff is
proposing a full depth reclamation method for your street. This technique is approximately one -half the cost
of traditional reconstruction methods and causes considerably less disruption during construction. This
method involves grinding -up the existing roadway pavement then regrading and paving the street. This
project could be constructed during the summer of 1999, with the public hearing process being held this
winter. More information will follow regarding costs, public hearing schedules, etc.
The majority of the neighborhood does not have concrete curb and gutter. Installation of concrete curb and
gutter benefits the surface water drainage and the structural integrity of a roadway. The Engineering staff is
requesting your input regarding the installation of curb and gutters along your street. Please complete the
following survey and return it in the enclosed stamped envelope by November 6th. Please contact
Wayne Houle at 826 -0443 if you have any questions.
Which curb & gutter system, if any, do you prefer? Please check one box.
■❑
Bulkhead Curb and Gutter:
• Best control of surface water runoff
• Defines yard / roadway.
• Most expensive (potentially adds $800 to $1000 per assessable lot)
❑ Surmountable Curb and Gutter:
• Controls surface water runoff
• Defines yard / roadway.
• Lower cost (potentially adds $600 to $800 per assessable lot)
❑ No curb or gutter: Existing condition.
• Least control of surface water runoff
• No yard / roadway definition.
• Prone to reducing structural strength of edge of roadway.
OTHER COMMENTS:
Address:
City of Edina
March 30, 1999
Re: Resident Letter No. 1
Project Information & Open House Notice
Rosemary Lane Roadway Improvements
Dear Rosemary Lane Area Residents:
The City of Edina has initiated the process for roadway improvements for your roadway. The
Engineering Staff is hosting an Open House regarding this project to be held on
Tuesday, April 6 from 5:00 to 6:00 PM at Edina City Council Chambers located on the
westerly side of the Edina City Hall at 4801 West 50th Street. The open house format will
consist of an informal question and answer session regarding the proposed project; no
presentation will be given. If you have any questions and cannot attend this open house do not
hesitate to call me at 826 -0443.
This proposed project consists of reclaiming the roadway as shown on the attached Reclaiming
Process Sheet. The majority of the existing concrete curb and gutter will remain in place; any
failed sections will be replaced. Utilities such as sanitary sewer and water services will also be
analyzed for any repairs or replacement at this time. The construction for this project should
take approximately three to four weeks depending on the extent of work to be completed (utility
work generally will take longer than just repaving).
The proposed preliminary schedule is as follows:
Informational Meeting ..........................April 6, 1999
Public Hearing ....... ............................May 3, 1999
Begin Construction ......... ............June / July, 1999
Complete Construction ...... August / September, 1999
Final Assessment Hearing .......... Fall of 1999 or 2000
Please keep in mind that this project is "proposed only" until the City Council orders it at a
Public Hearing. Also, you will be notified of the public hearing date at least ten days prior to the
public hearing.
The assessments for this project are preliminarily setup on a per lot basis, meaning all lots will
be assessed equally. Assessments are typically added to the tax roll after the final assessment
hearing and can be spread -out over 10 years. Proposed assessments for this project are
around $2,200 per lot and includes only the pavement reclaiming portion; any utility work will be
charged to the City Utility Fund.
One most
frequently
asked question
is "Why
does our street need
to' be rehabilitated ?"
Rosemary
Lane was
constructed in
1964. A
bituminous (blacktop)-
roadway with normal
City Hall .(612) 927 -8861
4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 826 -0390
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 826 -0379
Page 2
Rosemary Lane
Resident Letter No. 1
March 30, 1999
maintenance- will typically last -between 30 toi 35 years. Rosemary Lane is showing signs of
major cracking therefor it is not feasible to crackseal and seal coat this roadway. If the
pavement is not replaced at this time water will continue to infiltrate through the cracks into the
subgrade below the pavement and will cause major failure of the roadway. If this occurs the
roadway will need to be totally reconstructed costing approximately two to three times the cost
of reclaiming.
Another frequently asked question is "Why don't.regular taxes cover a project such as this ? ":
Money for roadways from the City's General Fund can only be spent on general maintenance of
City roadways such as cracksealing and sealcoating. Minnesota State Law only permits cities
to establish Utility Funds to maintain and upgrade water and sewer systems. Roadways and
sidewalks are not yet included therefor improvements for these types of projects need to .be
assessed.
It is to be hoped that this letter will answer most questions you might have. If you have any
additional questions or input and can not make it to the open house please call me at 826 -0443.
Sincerely,
Wayne D. Houle, PE
Assistant City Engineer
Attachments
STREET RECLAIMING PROCESS
often times a roadway may contain many patches and a lot of cracking, but may not be at a point of total
construction. Street reclaiming is a process that can be applied to these roadways. Reclaiming as
shown below is a process where a grinding machine will grind up the existing roadway using all portions of
the existing roadway. The roadway is graded and compacted then repaved. Disturbances to driveways,
yards and landscaping for areas that are not adding concrete curb and gutters is minimal and the City will
repair all disturbances that are associated with the project. Disturbances to driveways, yards and
landscaping for areas that are adding concrete curb and gutters will be affected depending on the layout of
the new curb and gutter; however the City will also repair any disturbances that are associated with the
project. Reclaiming is typically about 1/3 the cost of reconstructing the roadway.
Streets before the reclaiming process.
Reclaiming (grinding) Machine
New Pavement without curb and gutter. New pavement with curb and gutter.
� A. w9 . FEASIBILITY STUDY - A188
0 @ rd ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
�y CITY OF EDINA
STREET IMPROVEMENTS
EDEN PRAIRIE ROAD
APRIL 5, 1999
LOCATION:
INITIATION & ISSUES:
Eden Prairie Road from Blake Road to Kaymar Drive.
� Off■ a. �� �
■
E6
li;
This project was staff initiated by the Edina Engineering Department as part
of the neighborhood street reconstruction program. The street department
requested that this street be reconstructed due to the poor pavement
condition.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: The existing roadway was constructed in 1963 and consist of a 28 foot wide
bituminous rural section. Concrete curb and gutter along with other types of
curbs (timbers, bituminous, ect.) exist in front of some residents and both of
the condominium buildings at 6105 and 6005 Eden Prairie Road. The
pavement is in relatively poor condition with areas containing many types of
stress cracking along with many patches throughout. This roadway appears
to be at the end of its useful life; overlaying or sealcoating this pavement
would not be feasible.
Feasibility Study
Eden Prairie Road
April 5, 1999
Page 2
Pavement condition on Eden Prairie Road
IMPROVEMENT: This project involves reclaiming the existing bituminous, a process that grinds
up the existing roadway, regrades the road bed, excess material from the
roadway will be removed and the roadway will be repaved with a two and
one -half to three inch bituminous pavement. The portion of Eden Prairie
Road adjacent to 6016 Vernon Avenue will be removed, the pathway will be
extended, and the remaining area resodded. A neighborhood survey was
sent out last fall to all residents who do not have existing curb and gutters
asking for their opinion of installing concrete curb and gutter, see attached
copy of survey. The majority of the neighbors responding, 4 out of 6, were in
favor of installing concrete curb and gutter throughout. A second survey was
sent at the request of residents attending the informational meeting to these
same residents verifying the first survey. The majority of the neighbors
responding, 11 out of 17, do not prefer to have concrete curb and gutters
installed at this time. The second survey also asked if the residents were in
favor or not in favor of the project; the majority of the residents responding,
19 out of 36, are not in favor of the project. Due to the condition of the
roadway staff is still recommending this project.
Feasibility Study
Eden Prairie Road
April 5, 1999
Page 3
RIGHT -OF -WAY:
FEASIBILITY:
:ASEMENTS:
COMPLETION:
Existing curb & gutter at 6105 Eden Prairie Road
Adequate right -of -way exists.
This project is feasible from an engineering / city standpoint.
No additional easements will be required.
1999 Construction Season (June- August)
ASSESSMENTS: A special assessment of approximately $900 per assessable lot or unit
will be levied against the residents along Eden Prairie Road. Any residents
or owners that abut Eden Prairie Road with their side or back property lines
will be assessed one -third of front foot cost.
PROJECT COSTS: The total estimated construction cost is $37,000. The estimated
construction cost does not include storm sewer upgrades. Any storm sewer
upgrades will be funded through the stormwater utility fund. The estimated
project cost is $46,000, which includes indirect costs of 22.5 %, which
includes engineering, clerical, and finance costs. Funding for the entire
project will be from a combination of special assessment and stormwater
utility. See attached summary of the Project Cost Estimate.
PROJECT SCHEDULE: The following schedule is feasible from an Engineering standpoint:
Council Orders Public Hearing .............. ..........................April 5, 1999
Receive Feasibility Report ..................... ..........................April 5,1999
Public Hearing .. ............................... ............................May 3, 1999
Bid Opening ... ............................... ...........................June 10, 1999
Award Contract .............................. ...........................June 15, 1999
Begin Construction ................................................. End- June,1999
Complete Construction ...................... .....................September, 1999
9ZrIA.11??
ow a SURVEY
0
o CITY OF EDINA
V .3y
• ^'mx,onw'T�O
The City of Edina's Public Works Staff has determined that your roadway is at a point where additional
surface treatments or straight asphalt overlays would not be cost effective. The Engineering staff is
proposing a full depth reclamation method for your street. This technique is approximately one -half the cost
of traditional reconstruction methods and causes considerably less disruption during construction. This
method involves grinding -up the existing roadway pavement then regrading and paving the street. This
project could be constructed during the summer of 1999, with the public hearing process being held this
winter. More information will follow regarding costs, public hearing schedules, etc.
The majority of the neighborhood does not have concrete curb and gutter. Installation of concrete curb and
gutter benefits the surface water drainage and the structural integrity of a roadway. The Engineering staff is
requesting your input regarding the installation of curb and gutters along your street. Please complete the
following survey and return it in the enclosed stamped envelope by November 6th. Please contact
Wayne Houle at 826 -0443 if you have any questions.
Which curb & gutter system, if any, do you prefer? Please check one box.
❑ Bulkhead Curb and Gutter:
■ Best control of surface water runoff
• Defines yard / roadway.
• Most expensive (potentially adds $800 to $1000 per assessable lot)
❑ Surmountable Curb and Gutter:
■ Controls surface water runoff
• Defines yard / roadway.
• Lower cost (potentially adds $600 to $800 per assessable lot)
❑ No curb or gutter: Existing condition.
■ Least control of surface water runoff
• No yard / roadway definition.
• Prone to reducing structural strength of edge of roadway.
OTHER COMMENTS:
Address:
City of Edina
February 23, 1999
Eden Prairie Road Area Residents
Edina, MN
Re: Resident Letter No. 1
Informational Meeting Announcement
Eden Prairie Road Roadway- Improvements
City of Edina
Dear Resident:
As many of you know the City of. Edina has initiated the process for roadway improvements for
your neighborhood. The City of Edina is hosting an Informational Meeting regarding this
project to be held on Tuesday, March 16 at Arneson Acres Park, lower level meeting
room, at 8:00 PM. Arneson Acres is located at 4711 West 70th Street, two blocks east of Hwy
100.
The meeting format will consist of a short presentation followed by an informal question and
answer session. The presentation will cover scope of work and average assessment costs. If
you cannot attend this meeting please contact me at 826 -0443 and I will answer any questions
you may have.
Sincerely,
GZlaw �, 4"
Wayne D. Houle, PE
Assistant City Engineer
c: File
City Hall (612) 927 -8861
4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 826 -0390
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 826 -0379
March 4, 1999
Re: Resident Letter No. 2
Project Information
Eden Prairie Roadway Improvements
Dear Eden Prairie Road Area Residents:
City of tdina
Due to the interest in this project I am sending out this informational letter, describing the proposed
project, the potential schedule, and potential assessments.
This proposed project will consist of reclaiming the roadway as shown on the attached Reclaiming
Process Sheet. The results of the fall survey indicated a desire for concrete curb and gutters where they
currently do not exist. Engineering staff will look at any surface drainage problems that might exist and
ways to help alleviate these problems. The construction for this project should take approximately three
to eight weeks depending on the extent of work to be completed (utility work generally will take longer
than just repaving).
The proposed preliminary schedule is as follows:
Informational Meeting...... March 16, 1999 Complete Construction..... August / September, 1999
Public Hearing ............ End of April, 1999 Final Assessment Hearing ......... Fall of 1999 or 2000
Begin Construction ..... ... June / July, 1999
Please keep in mind that this project is "proposed only" until the City Council orders or dismisses it at a
Public Hearing. Also, you will be notified of the public hearing date at least ten days prior to the public
hearing.
The assessments for this proposed project are preliminarily setup on a per unit or lot basis, meaning all
units and lots will be assessed equally. Any lots that are adjacent to, but do not front the proposed
reclaimed roadway will be assessed at one -third the cost. Assessments are typically added to the tax roll
after the final assessment hearing and can be spread out over 10 years. Proposed Assessments for this
project are +$1,400 per unit / lot and includes the pavement reclaiming portion and all concrete curb and
gutter. Any utility work will be charged to the City Utility Fund.
It is to be hoped that this letter will answer most questions you might have. This information will be
reiterated at the informational. meeting, if you have any additional questions or input and can not make it
to this meeting please call me at 826 -0443.
Sincerely,
zl y
Wayne D. Houle, PE
Assistant City Engineer
City Hall. (612) 927 -8861
4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 826 -0390
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 826 -0379
STREET RECLAIMING PROCESS
Often times a roadway may contain many patches and a lot of cracking, but may not be at a point of total
reconstruction. Street reclaiming is a process that can be applied to these roadways. Reclaiming as
shown below is a process where a grinding machine will grind up the existing roadway using all portions of
the existing roadway. The roadway is graded and compacted then repaved. Disturbances to driveways,
yards and landscaping for areas that are not adding concrete curb and gutters is minimal and the City will
repair all disturbances that are associated with the project. Disturbances to driveways, yards and
landscaping for areas that are adding concrete curb and gutters will be affected depending on the layout of
the new curb and gutter; however the City will also repair any disturbances that are associated with the
project. Reclaiming is typically about 1/3 the cost of reconstructing the roadway.
Streets before the reclaiming process.
Reclaiming (grinding) Machine
New Pavement without curb and gutter. New pavement with curb and gutter.
9Zr1A, 1l?l
ow e `�� RE- SURVEY
�y EDEN PRAIRIE ROAD
..a Tti PAVEMENT RECLAIMING PROJECT
CITY OF EDINA
As many of you know the Edina Engineering Staff conducted a neighborhood informational
meeting on March 16. Over half of the attending residents requested that the neighborhood be
resurveyed for installation of curb and gutters. I've attached a postcard survey regarding this
issue. Please return this survey as soon as possible but no later than March 25. Also, please
include your house number for recording these results.
I've also reattached information on the different types of concrete curb and gutters. The results of
this survey will be included with the notice for Public Hearing.
Please contact Wayne Houle at 826 -0443 if you have any questions.
Bulkhead Curb and Gutter:
• Best control of surface water runoff
• Defines yard / roadway.
• Most expensive (potentially adds $800 to $1100 per assessable lot)
Surmountable Curb and Gutter:
• Controls surface water runoff
• Defines yard / roadway.
• Lower cost (potentially adds $600 to $800 per assessable lot)
iL SUMMARY OF COST ANALYSIS
EDEN PRAIRIE ROAD PAVEMENT RECLAIMING
CITY OF EDINA
Subtotal Construction Cost $ 34,000
10% Contingency $ 3,000
Total Construction Cost $ 37,000
15% Engineering & Clerical $ 6,000
Total Construction Cost $ 43,000
7.5% Finance $ 3,000
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST $ , 46,000
NOTE: Does not include any utility costs.
GAMPROV/A185/MISC /QUANTITIES - A188 Cost Estimate Page 1 2:00 PM4/1/99
i
.j
re
D
To: Mayor & City Council
From: John Wallin
Finance Director
Date: April 5, 1999
Subject: Resolution Calling for
Bond Sale for Series 1999A
and Series 1999B
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
Agenda Item # VLAXLB
Consent R
Information Only
Mgr.,Recommends
To HRA
®
To Council
Action F-1
Motion
®
Resolution
R
Ordinance
Discussion
Recommendation:
Approve resolutions calling for the bond sale of the $3,600,000 General Obligation
Utility Revenue Bonds Series 1999A and the $3,290,000 General Obligation Refunding
Bonds Series 1999B
Info /Background:
Attached is the Resolutions calling for the sale of the $3,600,000 General Obligation
Utility Revenue Bonds Series 1999A and the $3,290,000 General Obligation Refunding
Bonds Series 1999B as drafted by Dorsey & Whitney. Also attached is the report of
recommendations from the City's bond consultant Springsted.
RESOLUTION CALLING FOR THE SALE OF GENERAL
OBLIGATION UTILITIES REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 1999A
BE IT RESOLVED by the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City), as follows:
Section 1. Pugpose. The City owns and operates a storm sewer utility and a
sanitary sewer and water utility (together, the Utilities) pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section
444.075. It is hereby determined to be.in the best interests of the City to issue its General
Obligation Utilities Revenue Bonds, Series 1999A (the Bonds), pursuant to Minnesota Statutes,
Chapter 475 and Minnesota Statutes, Section 444.075, in the principal amount of $3,600,000, to
finance the cost of improvements to the Utilities.
Section 2. Terms of Proposal. Springsted Incorporated financial consultant to the
City, has presented to this Council a form of Terms of Proposal for sale of the Bonds, which is
hereby approved and shall be placed on file with the City Clerk. Each and all of the provisions of
the Terms of Proposal are hereby adopted as the terms and conditions of the Bonds and of the
sale thereof. Springsted incorporated, as independent financial advisors, pursuant to Minnesota
Statutes, Section 475.60, Subdivision 2, paragraph (9), is hereby authorized to solicit proposals
for the purchase of the Bonds on behalf of the City on a negotiated basis.
Section 3:` Sale Meeting. This Council shall meet at the City Hall on Monday,
May 5, 1999, at 7:00 o'clock P.M., for the purpose of considering proposals for the purchase of
the Bonds, and of taking such action thereon as may be in the best interests of the City.
Attest:
City Clerk
Mayor
RESOLUTION CALLING FOR THE SALE OF GENERAL
OBLIGATION REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 1999B
BE IT RESOLVED by the City of Edina, Minnesota (the City), as follows:
Section 1. Purpose. The City presently has outstanding its General Obligation
Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 1992A, dated as of October 1, 1992. To refund a portion of
such recreational facility bonds in a crossover refunding it is hereby determined to be in the best
interests of the City to issue its General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 1999B (the Bonds),
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475.
Section 2. Terms of Proposal. Springsted Incorporated, financial consultant to
the City, has presented to this Council a form of Terms of Proposal for We of the Bonds, which
is attached hereto and hereby approved and shall be placed on file with the City Clerk. Each and
all of the provisions of the Terms of Proposal are hereby adopted as the terms and conditions of
the Bonds and of the sale thereof. Springsted Incorporated, as independent financial advisors,
pursuant to Minnesota Stances, Section 475.60, subdivision 2, paragraph (9) is hereby authorized
to solicit proposals for the Bonds on behalf of the City on a negotiated basis.
Section 3. Sale Meeting. This Council shall meet at the City Hall on Monday,
May 3, 1999, at 7:00 o'clock P.M., for the purpose of considering proposals for the purchase of
the Bonds, and of taking such action thereon as may be in the best interests of the City.
Attest:
City Clerk
. Mayor
w
Recommendations
For
City of Edina, Minnesota
$3,600,000
General Obligation Utilities Revenue Bonds, Series 1999A
$3,290,000
General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 1999B
Presented to:
Mayor Glenn Smith
Members, City Council
Mr. Gordon Hughes, City Manager
Mr. Eric Anderson, Assistant City Manager
Mr. John Wallin, Treasurer /Finance Director
City of Edina
4801 West 501h Street
Edina, MN 55424 -1394
Study No.: E112601 P1
SPRINGSTED Incorporated
March 31, 1999
SPRINGSTED
Public Finance Advisors
RECOMMENDATIONS
Re: Recommendations for the Issuance of:
$3,600,000 General Obligation Utilities Revenue Bonds, Series 1999A
$3,290,000 General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 1999B
We respectfully request your consideration of our recommendations for the above bond issues.
The Series 1999A Bonds are being issued to finance stormwater and sewer utilities projects
within the City. The Series 1999B Bonds will refund the callable maturities of the City's General
Obligation Recreational Facilities Bonds, Series 1992A, dated November 1, 1992. The purpose
of the refunding is to achieve interest cost savings. Based on current interest rates, total net
present value savings is estimated at $206,285.
We recommend the following for the Bonds:
1. Action Requested
To establish the date and time of receiving
bids and establish the terms and conditions
of the offering.
2. Sale Date and Time
Monday, May 3, 1999 until 10:30 A.M., with
award by the City Council at their 7:00 P.M.
meeting the same day.
3. Authority for the Bond Issues
The Series 1999A Bonds are being issued
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes,
Chapters 444 and 475. The Series 1999B
Bonds are being issued pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475.
4. Principal Amount of Offerings
Series 1999A - $3,600,000
Series 1999B - $3,290,000. The amount of
this issue may be adjusted in an amount not
to exceed $150,000 in order to reflect final
interest rates on the day of sale and the
funding of the escrow account.
5. Repayment Term
Interest payments on the Series 1999A
Bonds are due February 1 and August 1,
commencing February 1, 2000. Interest
payments on the Series 1999B Bonds are
due January 1 and July 1, commencing
January 1, 2000. Principal on the
Series 1999A Bonds is due February 1,
2000 through 2009. Principal on the
Series 1999B Bonds is due January 1, 2003
through 2013.
6. Sources of Payment
The Series 1999A Bonds will be repaid with
net revenues of the City's Utilities Fund. The
Series 1999B Bonds will be repaid with net
operating revenues of the City's liquor, golf
course, and ice arena funds, which were
originally pledged for the payment of the
Series 1992A Bonds.
City of Edina, Minnesota
March 31, 1999
7
91
a
Prepayment Provisions
Credit Rating Comments
Federal Treasury Regulations Concerning
Tax - Exempt Obligations
Series 1999A — The City may elect on
February 1, 2007, and on any day thereafter,
to prepay the Series 1999A Bonds due on or
after February 1, 2008 at a price of par plus
accrued interest.
Series 1999B — The City may elect on
January 1, 2009, and on any day thereafter,
to prepay the Series 1999B Bonds due on or
after January 1, 2010 at a price of par plus
accrued interest.
The City is currently rated "Aa1" by Moody's
Investors Service and "AA" by Standard &
Poor's. An application for these issues will
be made to both rating agencies to assure
continuation of the ratings.
(a) Bank Qualification We understand the City does not expect to
issue over $10,000,000 of tax - exempt
obligations in 1999, and therefore the
Series 1999A and Series 1999B Bonds will
be bank - qualified: Issues which are
bank- qualified typically receive interest rates
which are lower than issues which are not
bank - qualified.
(b) Rebate Requirements The Series 1999A and 1999B Bonds are
subject to the federal arbitrage rebate
requirements on the investment of bond
proceeds. However, in regards to the
Series 1999A Bonds, if the City can meet
either the eighteen -month or the two -year
spend down exemption, you will be exempt
from rebating arbitrage earnings to the
federal government on the Series 1999A
Bonds. For the Series 1999B Bonds, the
City will not owe any rebate because the
refunding proceeds will be invested in an
escrow account at a yield at or less than the
yield on the Series 1999B Bonds.
Springsted currently provides rebate
calculation services to the City. An
amendment to that contract adding the
Series 1999A Bonds has been provided to
City staff.
(c) Bona Fide Debt Service Fund The City must maintain a separate bona fide
debt service fund for the Series 1999A and
the Series 1999B Bonds or be subject to
yield restriction or pay back excess
investment earnings in the debt service fund
Page 2
City of Edina, Minnesota
March 31, 1999
to the federal government. A bona fide debt
service fund is a fund for which there is an
equal matching of revenue to debt service
expense with carry over permitted equal to
the greater of the investment earnings in the
fund during that year or 1/12 the debt
service of that year.
(d) Economic Life The average life of the Series 1999A and
the 1999B Bonds cannot exceed 120% of
the economic life of the projects to be
financed. Both the Series 1999A and 1999B
Bonds are within the economic life
requirements.
10. Continuing Disclosure These issues are subject to the SEC's
continuing disclosure requirements. The
SEC rules require the issuer to undertake an
annual update of certain Official Statement
information and report any material events
to the national repositories.. Springsted
currently provides continuing disclosure
services for the City under separate
contract. An amendment to that contract,
adding both of these issues, has been
provided to City staff.
11. Attachments • Debt Service Schedule — Series 1999A
Bonds
• Refunding Schedules — Series 1999B
Bonds
• Terms of Proposal
DISCUSSION
The Series 1999A Bonds
The Series 1999A Bonds will finance stormwater and sewer utilities projects within the City. A
rate study was completed for the City in December 1998, incorporating the issuance of these
bonds and recommending a 4% rate increase.
The proposed debt service schedule for the Series 1999A Bonds is shown on page 5. The
bonds have been structured to provide for even annual payments over a 10 -year period. The
composition of the issue is provided at the bottom of page 5.
The Series 19998 Bonds
The 1999B Bonds constitute a crossover refunding, in which the proceeds of the refunding
bonds (new issue) are placed in an escrow account with a major bank and invested in
government securities. These securities and their earnings are structured to pay interest on the
new bonds until the call date of the Series 1992A Bonds (January 1, 2002), at which time the
Page 3
City of Edina, Minnesota
March 31, 1999
escrow account will cross over and prepay all of the remaining principal of the Series 1992A
Bonds. The City will continue to pay the debt service on the Series 1992A Bonds until the
January 1, 2002 call date. Beginning with the July 1, 2002 interest payment, the City will cross
over and begin to make debt service payments on the refunding bonds, taking advantage of the
lower interest rates.
We have attached a summary of the refunding on page 6 which shows the sizing of the
refunding issue and the estimated savings. Page 7 shows the current debt service
requirements for the Series 1992A Bonds. Page 8 shows the total principal being refunded on
the crossover date of January 1, 2002. Page 9 shows the principal and estimated interest rates
for this new issue. Page 10 shows the estimated annual'savings to the City after the crossover
date.
The bonds are expected to be sold at a true interest rate of approximately 4.34 %, resulting in a
savings to the City, net of all costs of issuance, of approximately $285,612, with a present value
of approximately $206,285. We will continue to monitor the market between now and the date
of sale and keep the City apprised of any adverse interest rate changes.
Respectfully submitted,
SPRINGSTED Incorporated
emc
Provided to Staff:
a) Amendments to Contract for Continuing Disclosure and Arbitrage Rebate
Page 4
City of Edina, Minnesota
G.O. Utilities Revenue Bonds, Series 1999A
Dated: 05/01/99
Mature: 2 -1
First Interest: 02/01/00
Total Total Net
Year of
Year.of
2,617,627
3,639,872
Discount (at 1.00 %)
Principal
Requirement
Revenue
Maturity
Principal
Rates
Interest
& Interest
@ 105%
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
m
1999
2000
335,000
3.40%
103,690
438,690
460,625
2000
2001
310,000
3.55%
126,863
436,863
458,706
2001
2002
325,000
3.60%
115,858
440,858
462,901
2002
2003
335,000
3.70%
104,158
439,158
461,116
2003
2004
345,000
3.80%
91,763
436,763
458,601
2004
2005
360,000
3.95%
78,653
438,653
460,586
2005
2006
375,000
4.00%
64,433
439,433
461,405
2006
2007
390,000
4.00%
49,433
439,433
461,405
2007
2008.
405,000
4.05%
33,833
438,833
460,775
2008
2009
420.000
4.15%
17.430
437.430
459.302
TOTALS:
3,600,000
786,114
4,386,114
4,605,420
Bond Years:
19,845.00
Annual Interest:
786,114
Avg. Maturity:
5.51
Plus Discount:
36,000
Avg. Annual Rate:
3.961%
Net Interest:
822,114
T.I.C. Rate:
4.161%
N.I.C. Rate:
4.143%
Interest rates are estimates, changes may cause significant alterations of this schedule.
The actual underwriter's discount bid may also vary.
Composition of Bond Issue
Stormwater Sewer Combined
Portion Portion Issue
Project Costs
1,022,245
2,617,627
3,639,872
Discount (at 1.00 %)
10,000
26,000
36,000
Issuance Costs
16,800
25,450
42,250
Less: Investment Earnings
4S 9.045)
69 07
11( 8.122)
Total Bond Issue
1,000,000
2,600,000
3,600,000
Page 5
City of Edina, Minnesota
G.O. Refunding Bonds
Series 1999
Crossover Refunding of Series 1992A
REFUNDING SUMMARY
Dated 05/01/1999 Delivered 05/27 /1999
SOURCES AND USES OF FUNDS
ParAmount of Bonds ........................................................ ............................... $3,290,000.00
Accrued Interest from 05/01/1999 to 05/27/ 1999 .............. ............................... 9,877.47
TOTAL SOURCES .............................. ...............................
............................. $3,299,877.47
Springsted
Public Finance
Total Underwriter's Discount (0. 800%) ....... ............................... ...................... 26,320.00
Costs of Issuance .... ...................... 45,440.00
Deposit to Crossover Escrow Fund ................................... ............................... 3,226,203.37
RoundingAmount .............................................................. ............................... 1,914.10
TOTALUSES ................................................................... ............................... $3,299,877.47
FLOW OF FUNDS DETAIL
CROSSOVER ESCROW FUND SOLUTION METHOD . ............................... Net Funded
Total Cost of Investments .................................................. ............................... $3,226,203.37
Interest Earnings a 4. 232% ........................ ............................... ..................... 353,503.30
TOTALDRAWS ............................................................... ............................... $3,579,706.67
PRESENT VALUE ANALYSIS SUMMARY (NET TO NET)
Net FV Benefit
$287,526.60
Net PV Cashflow Savings @:4.232% (Bond Yield) ..................... ..................... 204,371.03
Contingency or Rounding Amount ..................................... ............................... 1,914.10
NET PRESENT VALUE BENEFIT ................................... ............................... $206,285.13
NET PV BENEFIT / PV REFUNDED INTEREST 21.639%
NET PV BENEFIT / PV REFUNDED DEBT SERVICE 6.524%
NET PV BENEFIT / $3,215,000 REFUNDED PRINCIPAL ............................ 6.416%
NET PV BENEFIT / $3,290,000 REFUNDING PRINCIPAL .......................... 6.270%
BOND STATISTICS
AverageLife ....................................................................... ............................... 9.075 Years
AverageCoupon ................................................................ ............................... 4.2473960%
Net Interest Cost ( NIC) ...................................................... ............................... 4.3355456%
Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes ..... 4.2324877%
9 �s .................................... ............................... 4.3425428%
True Interest Cost ( TIC) .......................:....................... ...............................
All Inclusive Cost (AIC) .................................................................................... 4.5352907%
313011999 1:09 PM
Page 6
YIELD STATISTICS
AverageLife ........................................................................................... ............................... 8.349 Years
Weighted Maturity Average Basis 8.277 Years
9 ntY ( Par ) ................................................. ...............................
Average Coupon .................................................................................... ............................... 5.9422255%
Springsted 3130 /1999 1:09 PM
Public Finance
Page 7
City of Edina, Minnesota
G.O. Recreational Facility
Bonds
Series 1992A
PRIOR ORIGINAL DEBT SERVICE
Date
Principal
Coupon
Interest
Total P +I
7/01 /1999
-
-
106,257.50
106,257.50
1/01/2000
130,000-00
5.000%
106,257.50
236,257.50
7/01/2000
-
-
103,007.50
103,007.50
1/01/2001
135,000.00
5.200%
103,007.50
238,007.50
7/01/2001
-
99,497.50
99,497.50
1 /01 /2002
170,000.00
5.400%
99,497.50
269,497.50
7/01/2002
-
-
94,907.50
94,907.50
1/01/2003
200,000.00
5.500%
94,907.50
294,907.50
7/01 /2003
-
-
89,407.50
89,407.50
11012004
235,000.00
5.600%
89,407.50
324,407.50
7/01/2004
-
-
82,827.50
82,827.50
1/012005
250,000-00
5.700%
82,827.50
332,827.50
7/012005
-
..
75,702.50
75,702.50
1/012006
260,000.00
5.800%
75,702.50
335,702.50
7/012006
-
68,162.50
68,162.50
1/01/2007
275,000.00
5.900%
68,162.50
343,162.50
7/012007
-
-
60,050.00
60,050.00
20
1/0108
285,000.00
5.950%
60,050.00
345,050.00
7/012008
-
-
51,571.25
51,571.25
/20
1/0109
305,000.00
6.000%
51,571.25
356,571.25
71012009
-
-
42,421.25
42,421.25
1/01/2010
320,000.00
6.000%
42,421.25
362,421.25
7/012010
-
-
32,821.25
32,821.25
1/012011
340,000.00
6.050%
32,821.25
372,821.25
7/01/2011
-
-
22,536.25
22'536'2
1/012012
360,000.00
6.050%
22,536.25
382,536.25
7/01 /2012
-
11,646.25
11,646.25
1/012013
385,000.00
6.050%
11,646.25
396,646.25
Total
3,650,000.00
-
1,881,632.50
5,531,632.50
YIELD STATISTICS
AverageLife ........................................................................................... ............................... 8.349 Years
Weighted Maturity Average Basis 8.277 Years
9 ntY ( Par ) ................................................. ...............................
Average Coupon .................................................................................... ............................... 5.9422255%
Springsted 3130 /1999 1:09 PM
Public Finance
Page 7
Date
7/01/1999
1/01/2000
7/01/2000
1/0112001
7/01/2001
1/01/2002
7/011/2002
1/01/2003
7/01 /2003
1/01/2004
7/01/2004
1/m/2005
7/01/2005
1/01/2006
7/01/2006
1/01/2007
7/01/2007
1/01 /2008
7/01 /2008
1/01/2009
7/01/2009
1/01/2010
7/01/2010
1/01/2011
7/01/2011
1/01/2012
7/01/2012
1/01/2013
City of Edina, Minnesota
G.O. Recreational Facility Bonds
Series 1992A
DEBT SERVICE TO MATURITY AND TO CALL
Refunded Bonds D/S To Call
94,907.50
94,907.50
94,907.50
94,907.50
94,907.50
3,215,000.00 3,309,907.50
Principal Coupon
_
5.000%
_
5.200%
_
5.400%
200,000.00
5.500%
235,000.00
5.600%
250,000.00
5.700%
260,000.00
5.800%
275,000.00
5.900%
285,000.00
5.950%
305,000.00
6.000%
320,000.00
6.000%
340,000.00
6.050%
360,000.00
6.050%
385,000.00
6.050%
Interest
Refunded D/S
94,907.50
94,907.50
94,907.50
94,907.50
94,907.50
94,907.50
94,907.50
94,907.50
94,907.50
94,907.50
94,907.50
94,907.50
94,907.50
94,907.50
94,907.50
294,907.50
89,407.50
89,407.50
89,407.50
324,407.50
82,827.50
82,827.50
82,827.50
332,827.50
75,702.50
75,702.50
75,702.50
335,702.50
68,162.50
68,162.50
68,162.50
343,162.50
60,050.00
60,050.00
60,050.00
345,050.00
51,571.25
51,571.25
51,571.25
356,571.25
42,421.25
42,421.25
42,421.25
362,421.25
32,821.25
32,821.25
32,821.25
372;821.25
22,536.25
22,536.25
22,536.25
382,536.25
11,646.25
11,646.25
11,646.25
396,646.25
Total 3,215,000.00 3,784,445.00 3,215,000.00 - 1,833,552.50 5,048,552.50 I
YIELD STATISTICS
AverageLlfe ............................................... ......... ....................... 9.241 Years
Weighted Average Maturity (Par Basis) ..... ............................... 9.168 Years
AverageCoupon ........................................ ............................... 5.9588696%
Springsted
3130/1999 1:09 PM
Public Finance
Page 8
City of Edina, Minnesota
G.O. Refunding Bonds
Series 1999
Crossover Refunding of Series 1992A
DEBT SERVICE SCHEDULE
Date
Principal
Coupon
Interest
Total P +I
• 7101/1999
-
'
-
91,176.67
91,176.67
1 /01/2000
1/01/2000
-
-
68,382.50
68,382.50
4.2324877%
4.5352907%
-
-
68,382.50
68,382.50
1 /01/2001
1
-
-
68,382.50
68,382.50
7/01/2001
-
-
68,382.50
68,382.50
1 /01/200
1
-
-
68,382.50
68,382.50
7/01/2002
1/01/2003
-
225,000.00
3.700%
68,382.50
293,382.50
-
64,220.00
64,220.00
7/01/2003
1/01/2004
-
260,000.00
3.800%
64,220.00
324,220.00
-
59,280.00
59,280.00
7/01/2004
1 /01/2005
-
270,000.00
3.950%
59,280.00
329,280.00
-
53,947.50
53,947.50
7/01/2005
1/01/2006
-
275,000.00
4.000%
53,947.50
328,947.50
-
48,447.50
48,447.50
7/01/2006
1/01/2007
-
290,000.00
4.0 00%
48,447.50
338,447.50
7/01/2007
-
-
42,647-50
42,647.50
1/01/2008
295,000.00
4.0 50%
42,647.50
337,647.50
-
36,673.75
36,673.75
7/01/2008
1/01/2009
-
310,000.00
4.150%
36,673.75
346,673.75
7/012009
-
-
30,241.25
30,241.25
1101/2010
320,000.00
4.250%
30,241.25
350,241.25
7/01/2010
-
-
23,441.25
23,441.25
1/012011
335,000.00
4.400%
23,441.25
358,441.25
16,071.25
16,071.25
7/012011
1/01/2012
-
345,000.00
4.450%
16,071.25
361,071.25
7/01/2012
-
-
8,395.00
8,395:00
1/01/2013
365,000.00
4.600%
8,395.00
373,395.00
Total
3,290,000.00
-
1,268,201.67
4,558,201.67
YIELD STATISTICS
Accrued Interest from 05/0111999 to 05127/ 1999 .................................. ...............................
9,877.47
$29,858.33
BondYear Dollars .................................................................................. ...............................
9.075
AverageLife ........................................................................................... ...............................
73960%
AverageCoupon .................................................................................... ...............................
NetInterest Cost ( ) NIC .................................................................... ............•..................
"' 4.3355456%
True Interest Cost ( TIC) ................................. ............................... ........ ...............................
4.3425428%
Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes ......................................................... ...............................
4.2324877%
4.5352907%
AllInclusive Cost ( AIC) .......................................................................... ...............................
IRS FORM 8038
NetInterest Cost .................................................................................... ............................... 4.2481213%
Weighted Average Maturity .................................................................... ............................... 9.003 Years
Springsted
3/30/1999 1:09 PM
Public Finance
Page 9
PRESENT VALUE ANALYSIS SUMMARY (NET TO NET)
GrossPV Debt Service Savings ............................................... ............................... ..................... 204,371.03
Net PV Cashflow Savings @ 4.232% (Bond Yield) .................. ............................... ..................... 204,371.03
Contingencyor Rounding Amount ................................................................. ............................... 1,914.10
NET PRESENT VALUE BENEFIT ............................................................... ............................... $206,285.13
NET PV BENEFIT/ $3,215,000 REFUNDED PRINCIPAL ......................... ............................... 6.416%
NET PV BENEFIT / $3,290,000 REFUNDING PRINCIPAL ....................... ............................... 6.270%
Springsted
Public Finance 3/30/1999 1:09 PM
Page 10
City of Edina, Minnesota
G.O. Refunding Bonds
Series 1999
Crossover Refunding of Series 1992A
DEBT SERVICE COMPARISON
Date
Total P +I
PCF Existing D/S Net New D/S
Old Net D/S
Savings
1/01/2000
91,176.67
(91, 176.67) 342,515.00 342,515.00
342,515.00
-
1 /01 /2001
136,765.00
( 136, 765.00) 341,015.00 341,015.00
341,015.00
-
1/01/2002
136,765.00
(3,351,765.00) 3 ,583,995.00 368,995.00
368,995.00
-
1/01 /2003
361,765.00
- - 361,765.00
389,815.00
28,050.00
1101/2004
388,440.00
- - 388,440.00
413,815.00
25,375.00
1101/2005
388,560.00
- - 388,560.00
415,655.00
27,095.00
1 /01 /2006
382,895.00
- - 382,895.00
411,405.00
28,510.00
1/01/2007
386,895.00
- - 386,895.00
411,325.00
24,430.00
1101/2008
380,295.00
- - 380,295.00
405,100.00
24,805.00
1101/2009
383,347.50
- - 383,347.50
408,142.50
24,795.00
1/01/2010
380,482.50
- - 380,482.50
404,842.50
24,360.00
1/01/2011
381,882.50
- - 381,882.50
405,642.50
23,760.00
1/0112012
377,142.50
- - 377,142.50
405,072.50
27,930.00
1/01/2013
381,790.00
- - 381,790.00
408,292.50
26,502.50
Total
4,558,201.67
(3,579,706.67) 4,267,525.00 5,246,020.00
5,531,632.50
285,612.50
PRESENT VALUE ANALYSIS SUMMARY (NET TO NET)
GrossPV Debt Service Savings ............................................... ............................... ..................... 204,371.03
Net PV Cashflow Savings @ 4.232% (Bond Yield) .................. ............................... ..................... 204,371.03
Contingencyor Rounding Amount ................................................................. ............................... 1,914.10
NET PRESENT VALUE BENEFIT ............................................................... ............................... $206,285.13
NET PV BENEFIT/ $3,215,000 REFUNDED PRINCIPAL ......................... ............................... 6.416%
NET PV BENEFIT / $3,290,000 REFUNDING PRINCIPAL ....................... ............................... 6.270%
Springsted
Public Finance 3/30/1999 1:09 PM
Page 10
THE CITY HAS AUTHORIZED SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED TO NEGOTIATE THIS
ISSUE ON ITS BEHALF. PROPOSALS WILL BE RECEIVED ON THE FOLLOWING BASIS:
TERMS OF PROPOSAL
$3,600,000
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
GENERAL OBLIGATION UTILITIES REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 1999A
(BOOK ENTRY ONLY)
Proposals for the Bonds will be received on Monday, May 3, 1999, until 10:30 A.M., Central
Time, at the offices of Springsted Incorporated, 85 East Seventh Place, Suite 100, Saint Paul,
Minnesota, after which time they will be opened and tabulated. Consideration for award of the
Bonds will be by the City Council at 7:00 P.M., Central Time, of the same day.
SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS
Proposals may be submitted in a sealed envelope or by fax (651) 223 -3002 to Springsted.
Signed Proposals, without final price or coupons, may be submitted to Springsted prior to the
time of sale. The bidder shall be responsible for submitting to Springsted the final Proposal
price and coupons, by telephone (651) 223 -3000 or fax (651) 223 -3002 for inclusion in the
submitted Proposal. Springsted will assume no liability for the inability of the bidder to reach
Springsted prior to the time of sale specified above. All bidders are advised that each Proposal
shall be deemed to constitute a contract between the bidder and the City to purchase the Bonds
regardless of the manner of the Proposal submitted.
DETAILS OF THE BONDS
The Bonds will be dated May 1, 1999, as the date of original issue, and will bear interest
payable on February 1 and August 1 of each year, commencing February 1, 2000. Interest will
be computed on the basis of a 360 -day year of twelve 30 -day months.
The Bonds will mature February 1 in the years and amounts as follows:
2000 $335,000 2004 $345,000 2007 $390,000
2001 $310,000 2005 $360,000 2008 $405,000
2002 $325,000 2006 . $375,000 2009 $420,000
2003 $335,000
BOOK ENTRY SYSTEM
The Bonds will be issued by means of a book entry system with no physical distribution of
Bonds made to the public. The Bonds will be issued in fully registered form and one Bond,
representing the aggregate principal amount of the Bonds maturing in each year, will be
registered in the name of Cede & Co. as nominee of The Depository Trust Company ( "DTC),
New York, New York, which will act as securities depository of the Bonds. Individual purchases
of the Bonds may be made in the principal amount of $5,000 or any multiple thereof of a single
maturity through book entries made on the books and records of DTC and its participants.
Principal and interest are payable by the registrar to DTC or its nominee as registered owner of
the Bonds. Transfer of principal and interest payments to participants of DTC will be the
responsibility of DTC; transfer of principal and interest payments to beneficial owners by
participants will be the responsibility of such participants and other nominees of beneficial
Page 11
owners. The purchaser, as a condition of delivery of the Bonds, will be required to deposit the
Bonds with DTC.
REGISTRAR
The City will name the registrar which shall be subject to applicable SEC regulations. The City
will pay for the services of the registrar.
OPTIONAL REDEMPTION
The City may elect on February 1, 2007, and on any day thereafter, to prepay Bonds due on or
after February 1, 2008. Redemption may be in whole or in part and if in part at the option of the
City and in such manner as the City shall determine. - If less than all Bonds of a maturity are
called for redemption, the City will notify DTC of the particular amount of such maturity to be
prepaid. DTC will determine by lot the amount of each participant's interest in such maturity to
be redeemed and each participant will then select by lot the beneficial ownership interests in
such maturity to be redeemed. All prepayments shall be at a price of par plus accrued interest.
SECURITY AND PURPOSE
The Bonds will be general obligations of the City for which the City will pledge its full faith and
credit and power to levy direct general ad valorem taxes. In addition the City will pledge net
revenues of its utilities fund.. The proceeds will be used to finance sewer and stormwater
utilities improvements.
TYPE OF PROPOSALS
Proposals shall be for not less than $3,564,000 and accrued interest on the total principal
amount of the Bonds. Proposals shall be accompanied by a Good Faith Deposit ( "Deposit ") in
the form of a certified or cashier's check or a Financial Surety Bond in the amount of $36,000,
payable to the order of the City. If a check is used, it must accompany each proposal. If a
Financial Surety Bond is used, it must be from an insurance company licensed to issue such a
bond in the State of Minnesota, and preapproved by the City. Such bond must be submitted to
Springsted Incorporated prior to the opening of the proposals. The Financial Surety Bond must
identify each underwriter whose Deposit is guaranteed by such Financial Surety Bond. If the
Bonds are awarded to an underwriter using a Financial Surety Bond, then that purchaser is
required to submit its Deposit to Springsted Incorporated in the form of a certified or cashier's
check or wire transfer as instructed by Springsted Incorporated not later than 3:30 P.M., Central
Time, on the next business day following the award. If such Deposit is not received by that
time, the Financial Surety Bond may be drawn by the City to satisfy the Deposit requirement.
The City will deposit the check of the purchaser, the amount of which will be deducted at
settlement and no interest will accrue to the purchaser. In the event the purchaser fails to
comply with the accepted proposal, said amount will be retained by the City. No proposal can
be withdrawn or amended after the time set for receiving proposals unless the meeting of the
City scheduled for award of the Bonds is adjourned, recessed, or continued to another date
without award of the Bonds having been made. Rates shall be in integral multiples of 5/100 or
1/8 of 1 %. Rates must be in ascending order. Bonds of the same maturity shall bear a single
rate from the date of the Bonds to the date of maturity. No conditional proposals will be
accepted.
AWARD
The Bonds will be awarded on the basis of the lowest interest rate to be determined on a true
interest cost (TIC) basis. The City's computation of the interest rate of each proposal, in
accordance with customary practice, will be controlling.
Page 12
The City will reserve the right to: (i) waive non - substantive informalities of any proposal or of
matters relating to the receipt of proposals and award of the Bonds, (ii) reject all proposals
without cause, and, (iii) reject any proposal which the City determines to have failed to comply
with the terms herein.
BOND INSURANCE AT PURCHASER'S OPTION
If the Bonds qualify for issuance of any policy of municipal bond insurance or commitment
therefor at the option of the underwriter, the purchase of any such insurance policy or the
issuance of any such commitment shall be at the sole option and expense of the purchaser of
the Bonds. Any increased costs of issuance of the Bonds resulting from such purchase of
insurance shall be paid by the purchaser, except that, if the City has requested and received a
rating on the Bonds from a rating agency, the City will pay that rating fee. Any other rating
agency fees shall be the responsibility of the purchaser.
Failure of the municipal bond insurer to issue the policy after Bonds have been awarded to the
purchaser shall not constitute cause for failure or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery on
the Bonds.
CUSIP NUMBERS
If the Bonds qualify for assignment of CUSIP numbers such numbers will be printed on the
Bonds, but neither the failure to print such numbers on any Bond nor any error with respect
thereto will constitute cause for failure or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery of the
Bonds. The CUSIP Service Bureau charge for the assignment of CUSIP identification numbers
shall be paid by the purchaser.
SETTLEMENT
Within 40 days following the date of their award, the Bonds will be delivered without cost to the
purchaser at a place mutually satisfactory to the City and the purchaser. Delivery will be
subject to receipt by the purchaser of an approving legal opinion of Dorsey & Whitney LLP of
Minneapolis, Minnesota, and of customary closing papers, including a no- litigation certificate.
On the date of settlement, payment for the Bonds shall be made in federal, or equivalent, funds
which shall be received at the offices of the City or its designee not later than 12:00 Noon,
Central Time. Except as compliance with the terms of payment for the Bonds shall have been
made impossible by action of the City, or its agents, the purchaser shall be liable to the City for
any loss suffered by the City by reason of the purchaser's non - compliance with said terms for
payment.
CONTINUING DISCLOSURE
In accordance with SEC Rule 15c2- 12(b)(5), the City will undertake, pursuant to the resolution
awarding sale of the Bonds, to provide annual reports and notices of certain events. A
description of this undertaking is set forth in the Official Statement. The purchaser's obligation
to purchase the Bonds will be conditioned upon receiving evidence of this undertaking at or
prior to delivery of the Bonds.
OFFICIAL STATEMENT
The City has authorized the preparation of an Official Statement containing pertinent
information relative to the Bonds, and said Official Statement will serve as a nearly -final Official
Statement within the meaning of Rule 15c2 -12 of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
For copies of the Official Statement or for any additional information prior to sale, any
prospective purchaser is referred to the Financial Advisor to the City, Springsted Incorporated,
85 East Seventh Place, Suite 100, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101, telephone (651) 223 -3000.
Page 13
4
The Official Statement, when further supplemented by an addendum or addenda specifying the
maturity dates, principal amounts and interest rates of the Bonds, together with any other
information required by law, shall constitute a "Final Official Statement' of the City with respect
to the Bonds, as that term is defined in Rule 15c2 -12. By awarding the Bonds to any
underwriter or underwriting syndicate submitting a proposal therefor, the City agrees that, no
more than seven business days after the date of such award, it shall provide without cost to the
senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Bonds are awarded 145 copies of
the Official Statement and the addendum or addenda described above. The City designates
the senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Bonds are awarded as its agent
for purposes of distributing copies of the Final Official Statement to each Participating
Underwriter. Any underwriter delivering a proposal with respect to the Bonds agrees thereby
that if its proposal is accepted by the City (i) it shall accept such designation and (ii) it shall
enter into a contractual relationship with all Participating Underwriters of the Bonds for purposes
of assuring the receipt by each such Participating Underwriter of the Final Official Statement.
Dated April 5, 1999
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
/s/ Debra Mangen
Clerk
Page 14
THE CITY HAS AUTHORIZED SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED TO NEGOTIATE THIS
ISSUE ON ITS BEHALF: PROPOSALS WILL BE RECEIVED ON THE FOLLOWING BASIS:
TERMS OF PROPOSAL
$3,290,000'
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA
GENERAL OBLIGATION REFUNDING BONDS, SERIES 19998
(BOOK ENTRY ONLY)
Proposals for the Bonds will be received on Monday, May 3, 1999, until 10:30 A.M., Central
Time, at the offices of Springsted Incorporated, 85 East Seventh Place, Suite 100, Saint Paul,
Minnesota, after which time they will be. opened and tabulated. Consideration for award of the
Bonds will be by the City Council at 7:00 P.M., Central Time, of the same day.
SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS
Proposals may be submitted in a sealed envelope or by fax (651) 223 -3002 to Springsted.
Signed Proposals, without final price or coupons, may be submitted to Springsted prior to the
time of sale. The bidder shall be responsible for submitting to Springsted the final Proposal
price and coupons, by telephone (651) 223 -3000 or fax (651) 223 -3002 for inclusion in the
submitted Proposal. Springsted will assume no liability for the inability of the bidder to reach
Springsted prior to the time of sale specified above. All bidders are advised that each Proposal
shall be deemed to constitute a contract between the bidder and the City to purchase the Bonds
regardless of the manner of the Proposal submitted.
DETAILS OF THE BONDS
The Bonds will be dated May 1, 1999, as the date of original issue, and will bear interest
payable on January 1 and July 1 of each year, commencing January 1, 2000. Interest will be
computed on the basis of a 360 -day year of twelve 30 -day months.
The Bonds will mature January 1 in the years and amounts as follows:
2003
$225,000
2007
$290,000 2011 $335,000
2004
$260,000
2008
$295,000 2012 $345,000
2005
$270,000
2009
$310,000 2013 $365,000
2006
$275,000
2010
$320,000
The City reserves the right, after proposals are opened and prior to award, to increase or reduce the
principal amount of the Bonds offered for sale. Any such increase or reduction will be in a total
amount not to exceed $150,000 and will be made in multiples of $5,000 in any of the maturities. In the
event the principal amount of the Bonds is increased or reduced, any premium offered or any discount
taken by the successful bidder will be increased or reduced by a percentage equal to the percentage
by which the principal amount of the Bonds is increased or reduced.
Proposals for the Bonds may contain a maturity schedule providing for a combination of serial
bonds and term bonds, provided that no serial bond may mature on or after the first mandatory
sinking fund redemption date of any term bond. All term bonds shall be subject to mandatory
sinking fund redemption and must conform to the maturity schedule set forth above at a price of
par plus accrued interest to the date of redemption. In order to designate term bonds, the
proposal must specify "Last Year of Serial Maturities" and "Years of Term Maturities" in the
spaces provided on the Proposal Form.
Page 15
BOOK ENTRY SYSTEM
The Bonds will be issued by means of a book entry system with no physical distribution of
Bonds made to the public. The Bonds will be issued in fully registered form and one Bond,
representing the aggregate principal amount of the Bonds maturing in each year, will be
registered in the name of Cede & Co. as nominee of The Depository Trust Company ( "DTC "),
New York, New York, which will act as securities depository of the Bonds. Individual purchases
of the Bonds may be made in the principal amount of $5,000 or any multiple thereof of a single
maturity through book entries made on the books and records of DTC and its participants.
Principal and interest are payable by the registrar to DTC or its nominee as registered owner of
the Bonds. Transfer of principal and interest payments to participants of DTC will be the
responsibility of DTC; transfer of principal and interest payments to beneficial owners by
participants will be the responsibility of such participants and other nominees of beneficial
owners. The purchaser, as a condition of delivery of the Bonds, will be required to deposit the
Bonds with DTC.
REGISTRAR
The City will name the registrar which shall be subject to applicable SEC regulations. The City
will pay for the services of the registrar.
OPTIONAL REDEMPTION
The City may elect on January 1, 2009, and on any day thereafter, to prepay Bonds due on or
after January 1, 2010. Redemption may be in whole or in part and if in part at the option of the
City and in such manner as the City shall determine. If less than all Bonds of a maturity are
called for redemption, the City will notify DTC of the particular amount of such maturity to be
prepaid. DTC will determine by lot the amount of each participant's interest in such maturity to
be redeemed and each participant will then select by lot the beneficial ownership interests in
such maturity to be redeemed. All prepayments shall be at a price of par plus accrued interest.
SECURITY AND PURPOSE
The Bonds will be general obligations of the City for which the City will pledge its full faith and
credit and power to levy direct general ad valorem taxes. In addition the City will pledge net
operating revenues of its liquor, golf course and ice arena funds. The proceeds will be used to
refund in advance of maturity the 2003 through 2013 maturities of the City's General Obligation
Recreational Facility Bonds, Series 1992A, dated November 1, 1992.
TYPE OF PROPOSALS
Proposals shall be for not less than $3,263,680 and accrued interest on the total principal
amount of the Bonds. Proposals shall be accompanied by a Good Faith Deposit ( "Deposit") in
the form of a certified or cashier's check or a Financial Surety Bond in the amount of $32,900,
payable to the order of the City. If a check is used, it must accompany each proposal. If a
Financial Surety Bond is used, it must be from an insurance company licensed to issue such a
bond in the State of Minnesota, and preapproved by the City. Such bond must be submitted to
Springsted Incorporated prior to the opening of the proposals. The Financial Surety Bond must
identify each underwriter whose Deposit is guaranteed by such Financial Surety Bond. If the
Bonds are awarded to an underwriter using a Financial Surety Bond, then that purchaser is
required to submit its Deposit to Springsted Incorporated in the form of a certified or cashier's
check or wire transfer as instructed by Springsted Incorporated not later than 3:30 P.M., Central
Time, on the next business day following the award. If such Deposit is not received by that
time, the Financial Surety Bond may be drawn by the City to satisfy the Deposit requirement.
The City will deposit the check of the purchaser, the amount of which will be deducted at
settlement and no interest will accrue to the purchaser. In the event the purchaser fails to
Page 16
Y
comply with the accepted proposal, said amount will be retained by the City. No proposal can
be withdrawn or amended after the time set for receiving proposals unless the meeting of the
City scheduled for award of the Bonds is adjourned, recessed, or continued to another date
without award of the Bonds having been made. Rates shall be in integral multiples of 5/100 or
1/8 of 1 %. Rates must be in ascending order. Bonds of the same maturity shall bear a single
rate from the date of the Bonds to the date of maturity. No conditional proposals will be
accepted.
AWARD
The Bonds will be awarded on the basis of the lowest interest rate to be determined on a true
interest cost (TIC) basis. The City's computation of the interest rate of each proposal, in
accordance with customary practice, will be controlling.
The City will reserve the right to: (i) waive non - substantive informalities of any proposal or of
matters relating to the receipt of proposals and award of the Bonds, (ii) reject all proposals
without cause, and, (iii) reject any proposal which the City determines to have failed to comply
with the terms herein.
BOND INSURANCE AT PURCHASER'S OPTION
If the Bonds qualify for issuance ,of any policy of municipal bond insurance or commitment
therefor at the option of the underwriter, the purchase of any such insurance policy or the
issuance of any such commitment shall be at the sole option and expense of the purchaser of
the Bonds.. Any increased costs of issuance of the Bonds resulting from such purchase of
insurance shall be paid by the purchaser, except that, if the City has requested and received a
rating on the Bonds from a rating agency, the City will pay that rating fee. Any other rating
agency fees shall be the responsibility of the purchaser.
Failure of the municipal bond insurer to issue the policy after Bonds have been awarded to the
purchaser shall not constitute cause for failure or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery on
the Bonds.
CUSIP NUMBERS
If the Bonds qualify for assignment of CUSIP numbers such numbers will be printed on the
Bonds, but neither the failure to print such numbers on any Bond nor any error with respect
thereto will constitute cause for failure or refusal by the purchaser to accept delivery of the
Bonds. The CUSIP Service Bureau charge for the assignment of CUSIP identification numbers
shall be paid by the purchaser.
SETTLEMENT
Within 40 days following the date of their award, the Bonds will be delivered without cost to. the
purchaser at a place mutually satisfactory to the City and the purchaser. Delivery will be
subject to receipt by the purchaser of an approving legal opinion of Dorsey & Whitney LLP of
Minneapolis, Minnesota, and of customary closing papers, including a no- litigation certificate.
On the date of settlement, payment for the Bonds shall be made in federal, or equivalent, funds
which shall be received at the offices of the City or its designee not later than 12:00 Noon,
Central Time. Except as compliance with the terms of payment for the Bonds shall have been
made impossible by action of the City, or its agents, the purchaser shall be liable to the City for
any loss suffered by the City by reason of the purchasers non - compliance with said terms for
payment.
Page 17
'r
CONTINUING DISCLOSURE
In accordance with SEC Rule 15c2- 12(b)(5), the City will undertake, pursuant to the resolution
awarding sale of the Bonds, to provide annual reports and notices of certain events. A
description of this undertaking is set forth in the Official Statement. The purchaser's obligation
to purchase the Bonds will be conditioned upon receiving evidence of this undertaking at or
prior to delivery of the Bonds.
OFFICIAL STATEMENT
The City has authorized the preparation of an Official Statement containing pertinent
information relative to the Bonds, and said Official Statement will serve as a. nearly -final Official
Statement within the meaning of Rule 15c2 -12 of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
For copies of the Official Statement or for any additional information prior to sale, any
prospective purchaser is referred to the Financial Advisor to the City, Springsted Incorporated,
85 East Seventh Place, Suite 100, Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101, telephone (651) 223 -3000.
The Official Statement, when further supplemented by an addendum or addenda specifying the
maturity dates, principal amounts and interest rates of the Bonds, together with any other
information required by law, shall constitute a "Final Official Statement" of the City with respect
to the Bonds, as that term is defined in Rule 15c2 -12. By awarding the Bonds to any
underwriter or underwriting syndicate submitting a proposal therefor, the City agrees that, no
more than seven business days after the date of such award, it shall provide without cost to the
senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Bonds are awarded 125 copies of
the .Official Statement and the addendum or addenda described above. The City designates
the senior managing underwriter of the syndicate to which the Bonds are awarded as its agent
for' purposes of distributing copies of the Final Official Statement to each Participating
Underwriter. Any underwriter delivering a proposal with respect to the Bonds agrees thereby
that if its proposal is accepted by the City (i) it shall accept such designation and (ii) it shall
enter -into a contractual relationship with all Participating Underwriters of the Bonds for purposes
of assuring the. receipt by each such Participating Underwriter of the Final Official Statement.
Dated April 5, 1999
BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL
/s/ Debra Mangen
Clerk
Page 18
31- MAR -1999 (.o. page 1
COUNCIL CHE. REGISTER
CHECK NO
DATE -
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM--- - -
- - -- OBJECT-- - - -
-PO NUM
_ __
198232
04/05/99
$79.13
---------------------------------------------
3 -D Belt Company Inc
-
COST OFIGOODS PRO S
194524
PRO SHOP
COST OF GDS -PR
6331
< *>
$79.13*
198233
04/05/99
$856.26
3M CO HGF0878
Sign shop letters
TP24735
TP27364
STREET NAME SI
STREET NAME SI
SIGNS & POSTS
GENERAL SUPPLI
9706
1024
04/05/99
$240.95
3M CO HGF0878
HGF0878
GENERAL SUPPLIES
Sign sh p letters
TP27365
STREET NAME SI
GENERAL SUPPLI
1024
04/05/99
$558.06
3M CO
< *>
$1,655.27*
1
198234
04/05/99
$44.49
A World of Fish
Pond supplies
78020
POOL TRACK GRE
GENERAL SUPPLI
1806
< *>
$44.49*
198235
04/05/99
$64.95
AAA Credit Screening Ser PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES
4617
POLICE DEPT. G
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$64.95*
198236
04/05/99
$23.50
AAA
Change
26.152 to 30.1
030999
EQUIPMENT OPER
LIC & PERMITS
< *>
$23.50*
198237
04/05/99
$1,800.00
AAC Roof Consulting Inc Roof inspection
012599
POOL TRACK GRE
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$1,800.00*
198238
04/05/99
$180.00
ABDELLA, PAUL
AC service
032999
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$180.00*
198239
04/05/99
$522.06
ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY Air cylinder gutter b
04906200
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1462
< *>
$522.06*
198240
04/05/99
$370.50
Accountemps
Temp he i 1p
Temp help
439069
440520
FINANCE
FINANCE
PROF SERVICES
PROF SERVICES
04/05/99
$351.00
Accountemps
Accountemps
Temp help
441946
FINANCE
PROF SERVICES
04/05/99
$589.88
Temp help
443336
FINANCE
PROF SERVICES
04/05/99
$370.50
Accountemps
< *>
$1,681.88*
198241
04/05/99
$378.08
ACME WINDOW CLEAN
Windowicleaning
028730
STREET REVOLVI
GENERAL SUPPLI
1664
< *>
$378.08*
198242
04/05/99
$85.20
ADAMS PEST CONTROL
Critter control
74434
GRILL
CONTR SERVICES
1386
< *>
$85.20*
198243
04/05/99
$29.96
ADAMS, RITA K.
Phone modem
030899
GENERAL FD PRO
AMBULANCE FEES
< *>
$29.96*
198244
04/05/99
$223.44
ADVANCED GRAPHICS
SYSTEM SERVICE CONTRACTS EQU
020999
CENT SVC GENER
SVC CONTR EQUI
1818
< *>
$223.44*
198245
04/05/99
$1,319.85
ADVANCED STATE SECURITY Time lapse recorder & 18875
VERNON OCCUPAN
CONTR REPAIRS
< *>
$1,319.85*
198246
04/05/99
$170.00
Aearo Co
Safety
glasses
03700944 PUMP & LIFT ST SAFETY EQUIPME 1663
< *>
$170.00*
198248
04/05/99
$77.88
Airtouch Cellular
Bellev TELEPHONE
031099
031099
INSPECTIONS
PUBLIC HEALTH
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE
04/05/99
$5.71
Airtouch Cellular
Airtouch Cellular
Bellev TELEPHONE
Bellev TELEPHONE
031099
FIRE DEPT. GEN TELEPHONE
04/05/99
04/05/99
$251.98
$65.40
Airtouch Cellular
Bellev TELEPH
NE
031099
ADMINISTRATION TELEPHONE
PARK ADMIN. TELEPHONE
04/05/99
$100.91
Airtouch Cellular
Bellev TELEPH
NE
031099
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
31 -MAR -1999 (18:46)
page 2
CHECK NO
-------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT------
- - - - -- VENDOR---------
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
198248
04/05/99
04/05/99
$89.29
$27.26
Airtouch Cellular
Airtouch Cellular
Bellev
Bellev
- - - - --
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE
031099
PARK MAINTENAN
TELEPHONE
04/05/99
$8.19
Airtouch Cellular
Bellev
TELEPHONE
031099
031099
TREES & MAINTE
CLUB HOUSE
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE
04/05/99
04/05/99
$352.84
$80.57
Airtouch Cellular
Airtouch Cellular
Bellev
Bellev
TELEPHONE
031099
DISTRIBUTION
TELEPHONE
04/05/99
$134.29
Airtouch Cellular
Bellev
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE
031099
031099
ENGINEERING GE
SUPERV.
TELEPHONE
04/05/99
04/05/99
$436.33
Airtouch Cellular
Bellev
TELEPHONE
031099
& OVRH
POLICE DEPT. G
TELEPHONE
TELEPHONE
04/05/99
$30.02
$35.63
Airtouch Cellular
Airtouch Cellular
Bellev
Bellev
TELEPHONE
GENERAL
031099
INVESTIGATION
TELEPHONE
< *>
$1,696.30*
iUPPLIES
031099
ANIMAL CONTROL
GENERAL SUPPLI
198249
04/05/99
04/05/99
$136.85
$51.36
ALBINSON
ALBINSON
Laminate
I
map
782445
SEWER TREATMEN
CONTR REPAIRS
1520
< *>
$188.21*
Print re
roductions
785270
ENGINEERING GE
BLUE PRINTING
1609
198250
< *>
04/05/99
$79.39
$79.39*
ALL FIRE TEST INC
Fire inspection
025992
CLUB HOUSE
SAFETY EQUIPME
1642
198251
04/05/99
04/05/99
$215.40
$92.00
All Saints Brands
All Saints
COST OF
GOODS SOLD BE
8593
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
< *>
$307.40*
Brands
COST OF
GOODS SOLD BE
8884
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
198252
< *>
04%05/99
$106.02
$106.02*
Alliance Printing
Printing
curb cut for
6326
ENGINEERING GE
GENERAL SUPPLI
1374
198253
< >
04/05/99
$464.00
$464.00*
ALSTAD, MARIAN
AC pro sery
032999
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
.198254
< *>
04/05/99
$125.00
American Cup Tournament
Ad
1414
GOLF DOME
ADVERT OTHER
$125.00*
198255
< *>
04/05/99
$445.10
$445.10*
American Gothic
Pictures
032599
CLUB HOUSE
PROF SERVICES
1822
198256
< *>
04/05/99
$212.44
$212.44*
AMERICAN SEMI PARTS
Strap
885911
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1180
198257
< *>
04/05/99
$101.28
$101.28*
AmeriCom Inc
Video cable
epair
AX2548
CENT SVC GENER
PROF SERVICES
198258
04/05/99
04/05/99
$15.98
$293.49
Ameripride Linen &
Ameripride Linen &
Appar�LAUNDRY
Appar
022899
LABORATORY
LAUNDRY
04/05/99
$55.82
Ameripride Linen &
Appar
LAUNDRY
LAUNDRY
022899
FIRE DEPT. GEN
LAUNDRY
04/05/99
04/05/99
$223.88
Ameripride Linen &
Appar
LAUNDRY
022899
022899
50TH ST OCCUPA
CITY HALL GENE
LAUNDRY
LAUNDRY
04/05/99
$190.96
$74.73
Ameripride Linen &
Ameripride Linen &
Appar
Appar
LAUNDRY
LAUNDRY
022899
YORK OCCUPANCY
LAUNDRY
04/05/99
$77.69
Ameripride Linen &
Appar
Laundry
022899
022899
VERNON OCCUPAN
GOLF DOME
LAUNDRY
< *>
$932.55*
CLEANING SUPPL
198259
< *>
04/05/99
$64.00
Ancel, Lynette
CONFEREN
ES & SCHOOLS
032299
POLICE DEPT. G
CONF & SCHOOLS
$64.00*
198260
< *>
04/05/99
$657.33
$657.33*
ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS INC
Mobile r
dio
20661
EQUIPMENT OPER
RADIO SERVICE
1208
31 -MAR -1999 t- -o) page 3
COUNCIL CHE REGISTER
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
--- - - - - -- OBJECT_- - - -
-PO NUM
198261
04/05/99
- -
$175.00
-- ---------- ---- -
ANDERSON, ERIC
- - - -- ---------------------------------
Dues
031899
ADMINISTRATION DUES & SUBSCRI
< *>
$175.00*
198262
04/05/99
$675.59
ANDERSON, TODD
ADVERTISING
OTHER
032999
GOLF DOME ADVERT OTHER
< *>
$675.59*
198263
04/05/99
$100.00
Ankeny, John
Refund
wimming
031999
GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F
< *>
$100.00*
1
198264
04/05/99
$3;459.00
AON RISK SERVICES INC OF
INSURAN�E
236556
CENT SVC GENER INSURANCE
< *>
$3,459.00*
198265
04/05/99
$13.26
Apollo
Overhea
arms
896026
FIRE DEPT. GEN REPAIR PARTS
9942
< *>
$13.26*
198266
04/05/99
$25.97
Archie Bray Foundation C
COST OF
GOODS SOLD
11135
ART SUPPLY GIF COST OF GD SOL
1507
< *>
$25.97*
198267
04/05/99
$90.00
ASE Certification Tests
Certifi
ation test
032399
TRAINING CONF & SCHOOLS
< *>
$90.00*
198268
04/05/99
$7.71
ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO.
Shop pats
384821
EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS
1165
< *>
$7.71*
198269
04/05/99
$14.58
AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES
TELEPHONE
031699
CLUB HOUSE TELEPHONE
04/05/99
$184.52
AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES
TELEPHONE
031699
INVESTIGATION TELEPHONE
< *>
$199.10*
198270
04/05/99
$28.13
AT &T
TELEPHONE
031299
CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE
04/05/99
$7.95
AT &T
TELEPHONE-
031299
CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE
04/05/99
$7.95
AT &T
TELEPHO
E
031299.
CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE
< *>
$44.03*
198271
04/05/99
$6.35
AT &T
TELEPHONE
031899
INSPECTIONS TELEPHONE
04/05/99
$17.15
AT &T
TELEPHONE
031899
PARK MAINTENAN TELEPHONE'
04/05/99
$5.08
-AT &T
TELEPHONE
0318'99
FIRE DEPT. GEN TELEPHONE
< *>
$28.58*
198272
04/05/99
$100.00
Audubon International
Renewal
member
031799
GOLF ADMINISTR DUES & SUBSCRI
< *>
$100.00*
198273
04/05/99
$21.38
AUGIE'S INC.
COST O
GOODS SOLD
14059
GOLF DOME COST OF GD SOL
9025
< *>
$21.38*
198274
04/05/99
$43.15
AUTOMOBILE SERVICE COMPA Front alignment
16698
EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS
1282
< *>
$43.15*
198275
04/05/99
$798.75
Badger Meter Inc
Maint
467865
METER READING CONTR REPAIRS
1523
< *>
$798.75*
198276
04/05/99
$100.00
BALDINGER, WENDY
Perfo
041599
ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$100.00*
198277
04/05/99
$92.11
BARBARA BUIE /PETTY CASH
OFFICE
SUPPLIES
031999
ED ADMINISTRAT OFFICE SUPPLIE
04/05/99
$10.23
BARBARA BUIE /PETTY CASH
GENERA
SUPPLIES
031999
ED ADMINISTRAT GENERAL SUPPLI
OUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 31 -MAR -1999 (18:46) page 4
HECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT------ - - - - -- VENDOR--------- - - - - -- DESCRIPTION - - - - -- INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM
---------------------------- ---------=---------------
----------------------
198277 04/05/99 $10.67 BARBARA BUIE /PETTY CASH GENERAL SUPPLIES 031999 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI
< *> $113.01*
198278 04/05/99
04/05/99
198279 04/05/99
04/05/99
198280 04/05/99
198281 04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
198282 04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
198283 04/05/99
198285
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
98286 04/05/99
04/05/99
98287 04/05/99
$801.95 BARR ENGINEERING COMPANY Prof eng sery 23273546 GENERAL STORM PROF SERVICES
$779.39 BARR ENGINEERING COMPANY Prof eng sery 2327A121 GENERAL STORM PROF SERVICES
$1,581.34*
$101.15
$63.77
$164.92*
$199.39
$199.39*
$30.00
$120.00
$80.00
$80.00
$310.00*
$3,493.45
$4,592.60
$525.03
$8,611.08*
BATTERIES PLUS
BATTERIES PLUS
Battery Wholesale Inc
Batteries
D115653
GENERAL MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
1213
Batteries
D116213
GENERAL MAINT
SAFETY EQUIPME
1571
Batteries
5586
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
1164
BCA /Training & Developme CONFERENCES
BCA /Training & Developme CONFERENCES
BCA /Training & Developme CONFERENCES
BCA /Training & Developme CONFERENCES
I
BEARCOM Port radios
BEARCOM Port radios
BEARCOM Radio walki,
& SCHOOLS T007033
& SCHOOLS T007245
& SCHOOLS T007292
& SCHOOLS T007296
1185711
1185712
talkies 1193008
POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS
POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS
POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS
POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS
FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP REPLACEM 9955
FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP REPLACEM 9955
MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPLI 1383
$4,059.92 Bell Lumber & Pole Compa PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 0039115 PATHS & HARD S PROF SERVICES 1315
$4,059.92*
$31.82
$131.13
BELLBOY
BELLBOY
CORPORATION
COST
I
OF
GOODS
SOLD WI
15534100
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF
GD WINE
$131.13
BELLBOY
CORPORATION
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
16092600
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD LIQU
$131.13
BELLBOY
CORPORATION
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
16092700
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF
GD LIQU
$202.50
BELLBOY
CORPORATION
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
16092800
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD LIQU
$72.85
CORPORATION
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
BE
16100700
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GDS BEE
$31.00
BELLBOY
BELLBOY
CORPORATION
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
16100800
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD WINE
$183.95
BELLBOY
CORPORATION
CORPORATION
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
MI
29374300
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GDS MIX
$184.06
BELLBOY
CORPORATION
COST
COST
OF
OF
GOODS
GOODS
SOLD
SOLD
MI
MI
29374400
29374500
VERNON SELLING
YORK
CST
OF
GDS MIX
$304.25
BELLBOY
CORPORATION
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
16142800
50TH
SELLING
ST SELLIN
CST
CST
OF
OF
GDS MIX
GD LIQU
$44.00
$78.00
BELLBOY
BELLBOY
CORPORATION
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
BE
16142900
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GDS BEE
$60.37
BELLBOY
CORPORATION
CORPORATION
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
MI
1751500
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GDS MIX
$11.15
BELLBOY
CORPORATION
COST OF
GENERAL
GOODS SOLD
SUPPLIES
MI
29408800
YORK
SELLING
CST OF
GDS MIX
$5.10
BELLBOY
CORPORATION
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
MI
29409000
29409200
YORK
50TH
SELLING
ST SELLIN
GENERAL
CST
OF
SUPPLI
$106.91
BELLBOY
CORPORATION
RANGE BALLS
29410300
VERNON SELLING
RANGE BALLS
GDS MIX
$135.10
BELLBOY
CORPORATION
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
16191500
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD LIQU
$282.71
$2,127.16*
BELLBOY
CORPORATION
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
MI
29446000
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GDS MIX
$114.40
BENN, BRADLEY
Art work sold
032999
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
$53.88
$168.28*
BENN, BRADLEY
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
032999
ART CENTER BLD
GENERAL
SUPPLI
$33.00
Bertelon, Allison
Class
refund
030299
ART CNTR PROG
REGISTRATION
F
$33.00*
�
MEDIA LAB
PROF
SERVICES
032999
ART CENTER ADM
PROF
31 -MAR -1999 page 5
:OUNCIL CHISTER
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM--------
OBJECT---
NUM
- --
'HECK NO DATE CHECK
AMOUNT
----------------
- - -
-PO-
-
________
198290 04/05/99
$138.48
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
6393950
6398360
CITY HALL
CITY HALL
EQUIP REPLACEM
EQUIP REPLACEM
04/05/99
$86.22
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
6398450
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL SUPPLI
04/05/99
$160.64
$38.39
BERTELSON
BERTELSON
BROS.
BROS.
INC.
INC.
GENERAL.SUPPLIES
6398450
LIQUOR YORK GE
GENERAL SUPPLI
04/05/99
04/05/99
$136.60
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC..
GENERAL SUPPLIES
6398450
ADMINISTRATION
ADMIN GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
GENERAL SUPPLI
04/05/99
$14.49
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
6398450
6402260
PWKS
POLICE DEPT. G
OFFICE SUPPLIE
1296
04/05/99
$76.14
BERTELSON
BERTELSON
BROS.
BROS.
INC.
INC.
Open house
6404210
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL SUPPLI
04/05/99
04/05/99
$24.28
$29.15
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
6404610
GOLF ADMINISTR
G
OFFICE SUPPLIE
OFFICE SUPPLIE
1141
1325
04/05/99
$30.24
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
6412971
6412970
POLICE DEPT.
POLICE DEPT. G
OFFICE SUPPLIE
1326
04/05/99
04/05/99
$4.20
$41.02
BERTELSON
BERTELSON
BROS.
BROS.
INC.
INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
Binder notebooks
6417180
PARK ADMIN.
GENERAL SUPPLI
SUPPLIE
1326
04/05/99
$54.01
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
Office
6420810
6421170
POLICE DEPT. G
FIRE DEPT. GEN
OFFICE
OFFICE SUPPLIE
1354
04/05/99
$94.58
BERTELSON
BROS.
BROS.
INC.
INC.
supplies
GENERAL SUPPLIES
6421440
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL SUPPLI
1354
04/05/99
04/05/99
$60.51
$49.77
BERTELSON
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
6421740
PARK ADMIN.
ADMINISTRATION
GENERAL SUPPLI
GENERAL SUPPLI
04/05/99
$2.91
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
6421740
6421740
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL SUPPLI
04/05/99
04/05/99
$24.28
$69.90
BERTELSON
BERTELSON
BROS.
BROS.
INC.
INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
6430750
PW BUILDING
GENERAL SUPPLI
1410
1518
04/05/99
$70.80
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
6434780
6436860
ARENA ADMINIST
FIRE DEPT. GEN
OFFICE SUPPLIE
GENERAL SUPPLI
1358
04/05/99
$273.49
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
INC.
Storages boxes
OFFICE SUPPLIES
6438810
ED ADMINISTRAT
OFFICE SUPPLIE
1585
04/05/99
04/05/99
$77.34
$299.39
BERTELSON
BERTELSON
BROS.
BROS.
INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
6439600
LIQUOR YORK GE
GENERAL SUPPLI.
SUPPLI
04/05/99
$113.24
BERTELSON,BROS.
INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
6439640
6439660
LIQUOR 50TH ST
ENGINEERING GE
GENERAL
GENERAL SUPPLI
04/05/99
$76.90
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL 'SUPPLIES
6439660
FINANCE
GENERAL SUPPLI
04/05/99
04/05/99
$12.28
$25.77
BERTELSON
BERTELSON
BROS.
BROS.
INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
6439880
ARENA ADMINIST
OFFICE SUPPLIE
SUPPLI
9649
04/05/99
$1.20
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
GENERAL;SUPPLIES
6439601
LIQUOR YORK GE
GENERAL
GENERAL SUPPLI
04/05/99
$28.00
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
GENERALiSUPPLIES
GENERAL�SUPPLIES
6440230
6443780
ELECTION
SENIOR CITIZEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
04/05/99
04/05/99
$123.98
$23.43
BERTELSON
BERTELSON
BROS.
BROS.
INC.
INC.
GENERAL,SUPPLIES
S003336
FINANCE
GENERAL SUPPLI
SUPPLIE
04/05/99
- $31.94
BERTELSON
BROS.
INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
CM634315
ARENA ADMINIST
OFFICE
< *>
$2,229.69*
198291 04/05/99
198292 04/05/99
198293 04/05/99
04/05/99
198294 04/05/99
198295 04/05/99
198296 04/05/99
198297 04/05/99
$189.48 BEST BUY COMPANY INC.
$189.48*
$194.98 Bingo Sales Inc
$194.98*
$635.12 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS
$1,234.89 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS
$1,870.01*
$66.65 BLOOMINGTON LOCK & SAFE
$66.65*
$52.75 BLUHM, KIMBERLEE
$52.75*
$120.00 Bouta, Allen
$120.00*
$123.50 Bowman, Robert
$123.50*
COST OF GOODS SOLD 28100145 MEDIA LAB COST OF GD SOL 1067
Metal shelving strips 7804 50TH ST OCCUPA GENERAL SUPPLI
Asphalt
Bitcrete
Re key locks
Art work sold
Media lab service
AC service
78096 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLI 2852
78116 DISTRIBUTION BLACKTOP 2852
120999 STREET REVOLVI GENERAL SUPPLI 9504
031899 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER
032999
MEDIA LAB
PROF
SERVICES
032999
ART CENTER ADM
PROF
SERVICES
'OUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
31 -MAR -1999 (18:46) page 6
'HECK NO
- - - - - --
DATE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
198298
04/05/99
$83.17
BOYER TRUCKS
Shop parts
816583
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
9804
04/05/99
$385.58
BOYER TRUCKS
Shop parts
825013
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1186
04/05/99
$78.99
BOYER TRUCKS
Rad hose
825547
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1457
04/05/99
04/05/99
$51.46
BOYER TRUCKS
Regulator
825576
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1458
04/05/99
- $141.92
$9.48
BOYER TRUCKS
BOYER
Shop credit
826036
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1565
04/05/99
$14.92
TRUCKS
BOYER
Shop parts
828265
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1487
04/05/99
$6.37
TRUCKS
BOYER
Shop parts
829195
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1653
< *>
TRUCKS
Screw rock
929131
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1653
$488.05*
198299
04/05/99
$100.00
Bradley
Perform Edinborough
042299
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$100.00*
198300
04/05/99
04/05/99
$26.47
BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
032399
GOLF ADMINISTR
CONF & SCHOOLS
04/05/99
$78.10
BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE
POSTAGE
032399
GOLF ADMINISTR
POSTAGE
04/05/99
$6.06
$29.80
BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE
BRAEMAR
REPAIR PARTS
032399
CLUB HOUSE
REPAIR PARTS
04/05/99
$25.55
GOLF COURSE
BRAEMAR
PAINT
032399
RICHARDS MAINT
PAINT
04/05/99
$62.90
GOLF COURSE
BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
OFFICE.SUPPLIES
032399
PRO SHOP
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$228.88*
I
032399
GOLF DOME
OFFICE SUPPLIE
198301
04/05/99
$148.39
BRAEMAR PRINTING
ADVERTISING OTHER
51733
GOLF DOME
ADVERT OTHER
1385
< *>
$148.39*
i
198302
04/05/99
$124.61
BRENT'S SIGNS DISPLAY &
i
Sign for hist.soc
864
CONTINGENCIES
GENERAL SUPPLI
8469
< *>
$124.61*
198303
04/05/99
$123.59
BRISSMAN - KENNEDY INC
GENERAL SUPPLIES
565966
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
1405
< *>
$123.59*
198304
04/05/99
$731.10
Brock White
Bits, pins & spacers
EG116290
GENERAL MAINT
CENT.SERV PERS
9917
04/05/99
04/05/99
$561.68
Brock White
Carbide bits
EG112046
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
1168
$610.32
Brock White
25 -420 parts
SP132758
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1167
< *>
$1,903.10*
198305
04/05/99
$65.65
Brookhollow Human Resour
PRINTING'
032499
GOLF ADMINISTR
PRINTING
< *>
$65.65*
198306
04/05/99
$208.80
BROWN, ANNE BROWNFIELD
PRINTING,
030599
GOLF ADMINISTR
PRINTING
< *>
$208.80*
198307
04/05/99
$81.70
BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC
Rip rap
021599
GENERAL STORM
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$81.70*
198308
04/05/99
$56.71
Buffie, Jeff
GENERAL SUPPLIES
030999
ENGINEERING GE
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$56.71*
198309
04/05/99
$800.00
Bureau of Criminal Appre
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
031999
PARK ADMIN.
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$800.00*
1
198310
04/05/99
$85.00
Burtis, Bob
Service Edinborough
041399
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$85.00*
I
198311
04/05/99
$199.00
CALIBRE PRESS INC
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
282697
POLICE DEPT. G
CONF & SCHOOLS
8750
< *>
$199.00*
31 -MAR -1999 6) page 7
COUNCIL CHEOEGISTER
CHECK NO
DATE CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM--- - -
- - -- OBJECT-- - - -
-PO -NUM
198312
04/05/99
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
$63.70
CALLAWAY
GOLF
COST OF GOODS - PRO S
92307917
PRO SHOP
COST OF GDS -PR
802
< *>
$63.70*
198313
04/05/99
$4,572.75
CAMPBELL,
RALPH
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
032499
ADMINISTRATION
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$4,572.75*
198314
04/05/99
$170.00
CAPITOL
COMMUNICATIONS
Radio repair
26536
MAINT OF COURS
CONTR REPAIRS
1121
04/05/99
$40.39
CAPITOL
COMMUNICATIONS
Radio repair
26537
MAINT OF COURS
CONTR REPAIRS
1121
04/05/99
$71.81
CAPITOL
COMMUNICATIONS
Radio repair
26538
MAINT OF COURS
CONTR REPAIRS
1121
04/05/99
$71.81
CAPITOL
COMMUNICATIONS
Radio repair
26539
MAINT OF COURS
CONTR REPAIRS
1121
04/05/99
$71.81
CAPITOL
COMMUNICATIONS
Radio repair
26540
MAINT OF COURS
CONTR REPAIRS
1121
04/05/99
$130.42
CAPITOL
COMMUNICATIONS
Radio repair
26542
MAINT OF COURS
CONTR REPAIRS
1121
04/05/99
$71.81
CAPITOL
COMMUNICATIONS
Radio repair
36541
MAINT OF COURS
CONTR REPAIRS
1121
< *>
$628.05*
198315
04/05/99
$677.38
CARLSON
EQUIPMENT COMPAN Rental equip
16987090
GENERAL MAINT
EQUIP RENTAL
7842
< *>
$677.38*
198316
04/05/99.
$291.92
CARLSON
PRINTING
Business
cards
71375
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$291.92*
198317
04/05/99
$87.00
CASH REGISTER SERVICE
& CONTRACTED REPAIRS
7626
ART CENTER BLD
CONTR REPAIRS
1233
< *>
$87.00*
198319
04/05/99
$4,619.81
CATCO
REPAIR�PARTS
391260
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
9164
04/05/99
- $2,343.00
CATCO
Credit
392321
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
9885
04/05/99
$91.36
CATCO
Fittings
393590
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
9913
04/05/99
$64.97
CATCO
Part sleeve
394308
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
04/05/99
$55.27
CATCO
Fittings
394418
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
9929
04/05/99
$312.60
CATCO
Air dryer filters
394525
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
1176
04/05/99
$51.55
CATCO
Fittings
394535
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1172
04/05/99
$89.26
CATCO
Brackets
394699
EQUIPMENT OPER
GENERAL SUPPLI
1174
04/05/99
$79.68
CATCO
Shop parts
394983
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
1471
04/05/99
$87.65
CATCO
Fittings
394992
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
04/05/99
$373.94
CATCO
Shop parts
395112
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
1471.
04/05/99
$170.14
CATCO
Shop parts
395149
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1478
04/05/99
$15.86
CATCO
Check kit
395194
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1476
04/05/99
$3.88
CATCO
Hose
395203
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1478
04/05/99
$93.28
CATCO
Shop parts
395367
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1482
04/05/99
$75.08
CATCO
Hose cover
393369
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
9909
04/05/99
$184.53
CATCO
Shop parts
395599
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1492
< *>
$4,025.86*
198320
04/05/99
$95.00
CBT Inc
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
3578
ARENA BLDG /GRO
CONTR REPAIRS
1831
< *>
$95.00*
198321
04/05/99
$205.59
Center
for Performing
Ar Bulk mail
1135
CENT SVC GENER
POSTAGE
1231
04/05/99
$40.00
Center
for Performing
Ar Bulk mail
1127
CENT SVC GENER
POSTAGE
1231
< *>
$245.59*
198322
04/05/99
$718.02
CHEM CONCEPTS
Supply
17246
GENERAL MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
1756
< *>
$718.02*
198323
04/05/99
$28.17
CMC RESCUE INC
Strobel lens covers
03302
FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI
9959
< *>
$28.17*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
31 -MAR -19.99 (18:46) page 8
CHECK NO
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
198324
04/05/99
$295.05
COIT SERVICES
Carpet clean
M309818C
RANGE
PROF SERVICES
------------
1828
< *>
$295.05*
198325
04/05/99
$109.61
Commercial Pool & Spa Su
CHEMICALS
94720
POOL TRACK GRE
CHEMICALS
9975
< *>
$109.61*
198326
04/05/99
$412.50
Complete Energy Solution
NSP consulting
030899
CONTINGENCIES
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$412.50*
198327
04/05/99
$44.77
CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS
First aid stock
00857861
GENERAL MAINT
SAFETY EQUIPME
1294
04/05/99
$25.36
CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS
Latex gloves
00857894
GENERAL MAINT
SAFETY EQUIPME
1294
04/05/99
$70.03
CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
863924
BUILDING MAINT
SAFETY EQUIPME
04/05/99
$137.61
CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS
Safety glasses
866104
GENERAL MAINT
SAFETY EQUIPME
1573
< *>
$277.77*
198328
04/05/99
$159.50
Construction Market Data
ADVERTISING LEGAL
CB47355
ADMINISTRATION
ADVERTISING LE
04/05/99
$130.50
Construction Market Data
ADVERTISING LEGAL
CB47790
ADMINISTRATION
ADVERTISING LE
< *>
$290.00*
198329
04/05/99
- $689.85
CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS I
Credit
043662
GENERAL MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
9354
04/05/99
$308.85
CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS I
Gease oil
043695
GENERAL MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
9209
04/05/99
$89.46
CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS I
Cork board
043836
CITY HALL GENE
REPAIR PARTS
9389
04/05/99
$3,099.79
CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS I
Material)
43890
GENERAL MAINT
ROAD OIL
2859
04/05/99
$619.96
CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS I
Hot pour
043889
GENERAL MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
2859
04/05/99
$3,694.44
CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS I
Materials
43891
GENERAL MAINT
ROAD OIL
2859
< *>
$7,122.65*
198330
04/05/99
$476.89
COPY EQUIPMENT INC.
Work station referenc
0121284
ENGINEERING GE
EQUIP REPLACEM
9421
04/05/99
$57.01
COPY EQUIPMENT INC.
Blueline paper
0123103
ENGINEERING GE
BLUE PRINTING
1712
< *>
$533.90*
198331
04/05/99
$675.00
Corporate Advertising &
V ball awards
97200
EDINA ATHLETIC
GENERAL SUPPLI
9808
< *>
$675.00*
i
198332
04/05/99
$18.50
Corporate Express Delive
POSTAGE
104611
ADMINISTRATION
POSTAGE
04/05/99
$15.60
Corporate Express Delive
Carrier
105649
ADMINISTRATION
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$34.10*
198333
04/05/99
$30.00
Cournoyer, Nancy
Refund skating
040599
EDINB /CL PROG
LESSON PRGM IN
< *>
$30.00*
198334
04/05/99
$47.78
CRABB, CINDY
Art worklsold
031899
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
< *>
$47.78*
198335
04/05/99
$120.00
Crane Engineering & Fore
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
51100
PUMP & LIFT ST
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$120.00*
198336
04/05/99
$242.56
CREATIVE IMAGES ON RIBBO
OFFICE SUPPLIES
4676
ARENA ADMINIST
OFFICE SUPPLIE
1218
< *>
$242.56*
198337
04/05/99
$2,216.64
CROSS CREEK APPAREL INC
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CC267183
RANGE
GENERAL SUPPLI
9430
< *>
$2,216.64*
198338
04/05/99
$12.72
Crown Trophy
Medals for ice skatin
031099
ADAPTIVE RECRE
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$12.72*
1
#EGISTER
4
31 -MAR -1999 06) page 9
COUNCIL CH
CHECK NO
DATE CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
------------------
PROGRAM--------
- OBJECT--- - - -PO- NUM - - --
------------------
198339
_----------------------------------------------------------------
04/05/99
$228.43
Curtis 1000
Envelopes
24177701
CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI 9937
< *>
$228.43*
198340
04/05/99
$34.39
CUSHMAN MOTOR CO.
Blade
099809
101416
CENTENNIAL LAK REPAIR PARTS 1597
FIELD MAINTENA REPAIR PARTS 1122
04/05/99
$52.47
CUSHMAN MOTOR CO.
CO.
Repair parts
Repair
10141600
FIELD MAINTENA REPAIR PARTS 1122
04/05/99
$46.42
CUSHMAN MOTOR
parts
Blade
101551
REPAIR
04/05/99
04/05/99
$34.39
$8,450.78
CUSHMAN MOTOR CO.
CUSHMAN MOTOR CO.
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 101061
EQUIPMENT REPL
EQUIPREPLACEM 9534
< *�
$8,618.45*
198341
04/05/99
$342.91
Cutter & Buck
COST OF GOODS
- PRO
S 330701
PRO SHOP
COST OF GDS -PR 9427
COST OF GDS -PR 9428
04/05/99
$1,444.38
Cutter & Buck
COST OF GOODS
- PRO
S 331478
S 333064
PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP
COST OF GDS -PR 9427
04/05/99
$77.29
Cutter & Buck
COST OF GOODS
- PRO
< *>
$1,864.58*
198342
04/05/99
$110.00
D.C. ANNIS SEWER INC
Repair
Repair
6486
6558
PW BUILDING
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES 1293
REPAIR PARTS 1293
04/05/99
$298.00
D.C. ANNIS SEWER INC
valve
< *>
$408.00*
198343
04/05/99
$28.59
DANKO EMERGENCY EQUIPMEN
Freight' & fees
279961.
FIRE DEPT. GEN
FIRE DEPT. GEN
PROF SERVICES
GENERAL SUPPLI 6179
04/05/99
$355.64
DANKO EMERGENCY EQUIPMEN
E -81 parts
286832.
296382
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI 9941
04/05/99
04/05/99
$296.07
$32.53
DANKO EMERGENCY EQUIPMEN
DANKO EMERGENCY EQUIPMEN
Foam
Helmet front
296680
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI 9947
< *>
$712.83*
198344
04/05/99
$960.00
DAVE PERKINS CONTRACTING
Clean pond
20769
PONDS & LAKES
CONTR REPAIRS 9012
< *>
$960.00*
198345
04/05/99
$89.00
DAVIES WATER EQUIPENT
Repair monitor
11132
LIFT STATION M
CONTR REPAIRS 9877
04/05/99
$33.20
DAVIES WATER EQUIPMENT
Repair.monitor
11134
LIFT STATION M
CONTR REPAIRS 9877
< *>
$122.20*
198347
04/05/99
$897.65
DAY DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
BE 55310
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
04/05/99
$20.20
DAY DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
MI 55311
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MIX
04/05/99
$1,389.40
DAY DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
BE 55342
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
04/05/99
$40.40
DAY DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
BE 55346
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
04/05/99
$1,225.05
DAY.DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
BE 55347
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
04/05/99
$88.00
DAY DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
BE 55681
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
04/05/99
$790.20
DAY DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
BE 55804
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
04/05/99
$20.20
DAY DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
MI 55806
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MIX
04/05/99
$105.00
DAY DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
MI 55917
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
04/05/99
$2,107.20
DAY DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
BE 55918
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
04/05/99
$1,014.00
DAY DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
BE 55920
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
04/05/99
$20.20
DAY DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
BE 55921
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
04/05/99
$308.25
DAY DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
BE 56372
SOTH ST SELLIN
CST-OF GDS BEE
04/05/99
$467.60
DAY DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
BE 56431
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
GDS MIX
04/05/99
$105.00
DAY DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
MI 56436
VERNON SELLING
CST OF
OF GDS BEE
04/05/99
$20.20
DAY DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
BE 56437
BE 56438
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
CST
CST OF GDS BEE
04/05/99
$911.95
DAY DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
< *>
$9,530.50*
198348
04/05/99
$4.72
DC SALES COMPANY INC
GENERAL SUPPLIES
fixtures
813772.
815610
PKBOND CIP
PKBOND CIP
GENERAL SUPPLI
EQUIP REPLACEM 3402
04/05/99
$252.64
DC SALES COMPANY INC
COMPANY INC
Plumbing
Plumbing fixtures
813772
PKBOND CIP
GENERAL SUPPLI 3402
04/05/99
04/05/99
$266.88
$95.85
DC SALES
DC SALES COMPANY INC
Plumbing supplies
818727
PKBOND CIP
GENERAL SUPPLI 3402
OUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
31 -MAR -1999 (18:46) page 10
HECK NO
DATE
------
CHECK AMOUNT------------VENDOR
- - - - -- -----
VENDORDESCRIPTION
- - - - -- ---------
INVOICE
PROGRAM---
OBJECT--
<*>
$620.09*
- - - - -- ---------------------------------
-
- - - -- - -
- -PO -NUM
- - - --
198349
*>
04/05/99
$913.90
DCA INC
Fee for service
113120
CENT SVC GENER
HOSPITALIZATIO
<
$913.90*
198350
*>
04/05/99
$126.61
DELEGARD TOOL CO.
Wrench tools
33422
EQUIPMENT OPER
TOOLS
1087
<
$126.61*
198351
04/05/99
$4,595.17
DELTA DENTAL
HOSPITALIZATION
3178120
CENT SVC GENER
HOSPITALIZATIO
< *>
$4,595.17*
198352
04/05/99
04/05/99
$700.00
$700.00
Demers, George
Demers,
Fee for service
032499
PWKS ADMIN GEN
CONF & SCHOOLS
< *>
$1,400.00*
George
Fee for service
032499
CENT SVC GENER
ADVERT PERSONL
198353
04/05/99
04/05/99
$36.80
DENNYS 5th AV BAKERY
COST OF GOODS SOLD
13001
GRILL
COST OF GD SOL
9029
< *>
$40.20
DENNYS 5th AV BAKERY
COST OF GOODS SOLD
13751
GRILL
COST OF GD SOL
9029
$77.00*
198354
04/05/99
04/05/99
- $676.80
- $216.24
DEXTER SHOE COMPANY
DEXTER
COST OF GOODS - PRO S
901677
PRO SHOP
COST OF GDS -PR
04/05/99
$3,160.48
SHOE COMPANY
DEXTER SHOE COMPANY
COST OF GOODS - PRO S
901678
PRO SHOP
COST OF GDS -PR
< *>
$2,267.44*
COST OF GOODS - PRO S
145467
PRO SHOP
COST OF GDS -PR
6338
198355
< *>
04/05/99
$272.00
$272.00*
DIETRICHSON, BILL
AC service
032999
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
198356
< *>
04/05/99
$183.17
DIGITAL MATRIX SERVICES
Reproductions
152930
ENGINEERING GE
BLUE PRINTING
1224
$183.17*
.
198357
< *>
04/05/99
$208.38
Direct Safety Company
Respirators
13979800
GENERAL MAINT
SAFETY E UIPME
Q
1262
.$208.38*
198358
04/05/99
04/05/99
$128.33
$115.57
DMX
DMX
DMX speakers
233492
VERNON OCCUPAN
PROF SERVICES
*
<>
$243.90*
Speaker installation
I33931
YORK OCCUPANCY
PROF SERVICES
198359
*>
04/05/99
$525.00
DNR- Enforcement
Aerial deer survey
99236
DEER CONTROL
PROF SERVICES
<
$525.00*
198360
< *>
04/05/99
$60.68
DORFNER, MARK
GENERAL SUPPLIES
032999
POOL TRACK GRE
GENERAL SUPPLI
$60.68*
i
198361
< *>
04/05/99
$100.00
$100.00*
Down to Bare Wood
I
Repair chair
100598
CLUB HOUSE
REPAIR PARTS
1387
L98362
*>
04/05/99
$1,615.45
DPC INDUSTRIES
Water chemicals
01306524
WATER TREATMEN
WATER TRTMT SU
3325
<
$1,615.45*
198363
< *>
04/05/99
$55.58
DPD
PRINTING
77623
ARENA ADMINIST
PRINTING
1805
$55.58*
L98364
< *>
04/05/99
$85.03
E &S Electronics
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
ES1870
MEDIA LAB
CONTR REPAIRS
9836
$85.03*
I
.COUNCIL CHEIVGISTER 4 31 -MAR -1999 Ap page 11
CHECK NO DATE
CHECK . AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
---------------
PROGRAM---
-
- - - - -- OBJECT-- - -
- -PO -NUM
------------------------
198365 04/05/99
------
$38.55
- - - -
E -Z -GO
-- -------------
TEXTRON
- - - - --
REPAIR PARTS
0224597
GOLF
CARS
REPAIR
PARTS
1120
04/05/99
$94.53
E -Z -GO
TEXTRON
Repair parts
0228187
GOLF
CARS
REPAIR
PARTS
1307
04/05/99
$74.02
E -Z -GO
TEXTRON
Repair parts
0228320
GOLF
CARS
REPAIR
PARTS
1307
04/05/99
$200.90
E -Z -GO
TEXTRON
Cart parts
0233328
GOLF
CARS
REPAIR
PARTS
1589
04/05/99
$25.25
E -Z -GO
TEXTRON
Cart parts
0233329
GOLF
CARS
REPAIR
PARTS
1120
04/05/99
$83.65
E -Z -GO
TEXTRON
Repair parts
0234014
GOLF
CARS
REPAIR
PARTS
1307
04/05/99
$322.19
E -Z -GO
TEXTRON
Repair parts
0234398
GOLF
CARS
REPAIR
PARTS
1309
< *>
$839.09*
198366
198367
198369
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
198370 04/05/99
198371 04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
198372 04/05/99
198373 04/05/99
$1,283.91
$969.68
$4,167.47
-$5.33
$449.84
$1,133.86
$720.55
$1,436.02
$640.62
$1,075.12
$11,871.74*
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
$115.87 EARL F. ANDERSON
$115.87*
$9.35
$1,575.00
$1,724.50
$2,418.25
$69.55
$3,374.55
$2,096.30
$9.05
$17.60
$2,811.30
$1,924.70
$2,460.45
$45.25
$18,535.85*
$64.00
$64.00*
$50.00
$50.00
$50.00
$50.00
$50.00
$50.00
$50.00
$350.00*
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
EDEWAARD, LAURENE
EDINA ATHLETIC BOOSTER
EDINA ATHLETIC BOOSTER
EDINA ATHLETIC BOOSTER
EDINA ATHLETIC BOOSTER
EDINA ATHLETIC BOOSTER
EDINA ATHLETIC BOOSTER
EDINA ATHLETIC BOOSTER
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 25177
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 25181
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 25187
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 105867
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 27877
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 27882
COST 00 GOODS SOLD WI 27886
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 30723
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 30725
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 30728
Bldg materials 15665
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 439262
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 439264
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 439265
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 439833
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 442239
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 442240
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 442244
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 442245
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 442246
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 442790
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 445145
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 445685
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 445686
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 032299
ADVERTISING OTHER 040599
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 040599
ADVERTISING OTHER 040599
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 040599
ADVERTISING OTHER 040599
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 040599
ADVERTISING OTHER 040599
$300.00 EDINA HOCKEY ASSOCIATION DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
$300.00*
$67.28 EDMUNDS, LIZ COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 1439
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS
ED ADMINISTRAT ADVERT OTHER
GOLF ADMINISTR PROF SERVICES
FRED RICHARDS ADVERT OTHER
GOLF DOME PROF SERVICES
POOL ADMIN ADVERT OTHER
ARENA ADMINIST PROF SERVICES
ART CENTER ADM ADVERT OTHER
032399 PARK ADMIN. DUES & SUBSCRI
031999 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
OUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
31 -MAR -1999 (18:46) page 12
HECK NO
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
<*>
$67.28*
198374
04/05/99
$884.62
EDWARD KRAEMER & SONS IN
Gravel
214
GENERAL STORM
GENERAL SUPPLI
1658
< *>
$884.62*
198375
04/05/99
$650.00
EMPLOYEES CLUB
GENERAL SUPPLIES
APRIL 19
CONTINGENCIES
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$650.00*
198376
04/05/99
$322.41
EPA AUDIO VISUAL INC
i
Initial set up
122114
MEDIA LAB
EQUIP REPLACEM
8299
< *>
$322.41*
198377
04/05/99
$33.74
ERICKSON, MARY
Art work sold
031899
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
< *>
$33.74*
198378
04/05/99
$2,000.00
Explore Minnesota Golf A
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
032399
.GOLF ADMINISTR
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$2,000.00*
198379
04/05/99
$83.79
Factory Motor Parts Comp
I
Motor
1498512
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1454
< *>
$83.79*
198380
04/05/99
04/05/99
$63.90
FASTSIGN
Signs
B12321
POOL TRACK GRE
GENERAL SUPPLI
1584
< *>
$63.90
$127.80*
FASTSIGN
Signs I
B12321
POOL TRACK GRE
GENERAL SUPPLI
1584
198381
04/05/99
$45.00
FINE, AGNES
Program
042599
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$45.00*
198382
04/05/99
$793.07
FISHER SCIENTIFIC
Lab supplies
6923575
LABORATORY
GENERAL SUPPLI
1244
< *>
$793.07*
198383
04/05/99
$675.00
FLEX- O -LITE INC
Sign shop
stock
34537
PAVEMENT MARKI
GENERAL SUPPLI
1080
< *>
$675.00*
198384
04/05/99
04/05/99
$833.64
$169.32
FOOT -JOY
FOOT
COST OF GOODS - PRO S
3045661
PRO SHOP
COST OF GDS -PR
6333
< *>
$1,002.96*
-JOY
COST OF GOODS - PRO S
I
3050175
PRO SHOP
COST OF GDS -PR
6333
198385
04/05/99
$391.92
Force America
I
Shop supplies
172439
EQUIPMENT OPER
GENERAL SUPPLI
1455
< *>
$391.92*
198386
04/05/99
$313.66
FORMS GROUP, THE
PRINTING
2445
POLICE DEPT. G
PRINTING
7594
< *>
$313.66*
I
198387
04/05/99
$1,217.02
FORRESTER'S
COST OF GOODS - PRO S
0085039
PRO SHOP
COST OF GDS -PR
6339
< *>
$1,217.02*
198388
04/05/99
$45.00
FORSETH, JOEL
Undercover
032699
GENERAL FD PRO
CIGARETTE LICE
< *>
$45.00*
198389
04/05/99.
$33.40
Fowler Electric
Repair parts
53928400
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS
1305
04/05/99
$32.56
Fowler Electric
REPAIR PARTS
53940100
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS
1310
< *>
$65.96*
198390
04/05/99
$37.45
Franklin Covey
Refil planner
70191986
PARK ADMIN.
OFFICE SUPPLIE
1498
< *>
$37.45*
0
31 -MAR -1999 (P) page 13
. COUNCIL CH EGISTER
DATE CHECK
AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION INVOICE
OBJECT--- - - -PO- NUM - - --
PROGRAM--------
CHECK NO
_ __
_ ----------------------------------
04/05/99
$995.78
-------------------------------------------------
FREEWAY RADIATOR SERVICE
-
Radiator service 24418 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 991
198391
< *>
$995.78*
198392
04/05/99
$432.00
Frey, Michael
AC service 032999 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES
< *>
$432.00*
198393
04/05/99
$27.00
Fritz, Ann M
Class refund 032499 ART CNTR PROG REGISTRATION F
< *>
$27.00*
198394
04/05/99
$282.36
FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
040599
CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE
< *>
$282.36*
198395
04/05/99
$585.79
G & K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
022699
022699
GENERAL MAINT LAUNDRY
BUILDING MAINT LAUNDRY
04/05/99
$465.72
G & K SERVICES
K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
LAUNDRY
022699
ARENA BLDG /GRO LAUNDRY
04/05/99
04/05/99
$152.58
$41.56
G &
G & K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
022699
CITY HALL GENE LAUNDRY
REVOLVI GENERAL SUPPLI
04/05/99
$45.60
G & K SERVICES
GENERAL' SUPPLIES
CLEANING SUPPLIES
022699
022699
STREET
PW BUILDING CLEANING SUPPL
04/05/99
04/05/99
$175.62
$102.68
G & K SERVICES
G & K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
022699
PUMP & LIFT ST LAUNDRY
04/05/99
$332.97
G & K SERVICES
LAUNDRY
022699
EQUIPMENT OPER LAUNDRY
< *>
$1,902.52*
198396
04/05/99
$2,194.20
G.L. CONTRACTING INC
Repair water main
037219
DISTRIBUTION CONTR REPAIRS 8993
< *>
$2,194.20*
198397
04/05/99
$223.75
Galeton Gloves
Gloves
327775
GENERAL MAINT SAFETY EQUIPME 1252
< *>
$223.75*
198398
04/05/99
$107.98
GALL'S INC
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
52943874
POLICE DEPT. G UNIF ALLOW 9416
DEPT. G EQUIP MAINT 1327
04/05/99
$107.98
GALL'S INC
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
52987605
53002183
POLICE
POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP MAINT 1327
04/05/99
$107.98
GALL'S INC
< *>
$323.94*
198399
04/05/99
$27.95
GARDEN DESIGN
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
031199
PARK MAINTENAN CONF & SCHOOLS
< *>
$27.95*
198400
04/05/99
$43.68
Gary M Soule & Associate OFFICE SUPPLIES
6800
GOLF ADMINISTR OFFICE SUPPLIE 1639
< *>
$43.68*
198401
04/05/99
$1,290.50
GE Capital IT Solutions
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
90236054
POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP REPLACEM 9405
04/05/99
$720.58
GE Capital IT Solutions
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
90250936
POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP REPLACEM 9405
04/05/99
$370.62
GE Capital IT Solutions
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
90257441
POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP REPLACEM 9405
04/05/99
$1,728.79
GE Capital IT Solutions
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
90269041
POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP REPLACEM 9405
< *>
$4,110.49*
198402
04/05/99
$44.46
GE Capital Information T EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
90226004
POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP MAINT
< *>
$44.46*
198403
04/05/99
$1,858.88
GEAR for Sports
COST OF GOODS - PRO S
S
853221
853987
PRO SHOP COST OF GDS =PR 9755
PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 9755
04/05/99
$1,322.55
GEAR for Sports
COST OF GOODS - PRO
< *>
$3,181.43*
198404
04/05/99
$60.00
GLEN SIPE PIANO SERVICE
Piano tuning
990317
CENTENNIAL LAK CONTR REPAIRS 1767
< *>
$60.00*
OUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
31 -MAR -1999 (18:46) page 14
HECK NO
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
198405
04/05/99
$40.00
Golden Valley
Services
041899
ED ADMINISTRAT
-=----------------
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$40.00*
198406
04/05/99
$230.00
GOLFCRAFT
Cart parts
11824
PRO SHOP
COST OF GDS -PR
04/05/99
$725.00
GOLFCRAFT
COST OF GOODS - PRO S
11833
PRO SHOP
COST OF GDS -PR
9448
04/05/99
$145.00
GOLFCRAFT
COST OF GOODS - PRO S
11836
PRO SHOP
COST OF GDS -PR
9448
04/05/99
$220.00
GOLFCRAFT
Rental clubs
11846
RANGE
GENERAL SUPPLI
9448
04/05/99 _.
$330.00
GOLFCRAFT
Rental clubs
11846
FRED RICHARDS
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$1,650.00*
198407
04/05/99
$611.40
GOODALL MFG CO
Tools
10489100
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1470
< *>
$611.40*
198408
04/05/99
$17.98
GOPHER CASH REGISTER
OFFICE SUPPLIES
20235
ARENA ADMINIST
OFFICE SUPPLIE
1773
04/05/99
$70.33
GOPHER CASH REGISTER
CLEANING'SUPPLIES
17156
ARENA ADMINIST
CLEANING SUPPL
1614
< *>
$88.31*
198409
04/05/99
$56.00
GOPHER STATE 1 CALL
Gopher state locates
9020246
SUPERV. & OVRH
HAZ. WASTE DIS
1279
< *>
$56.00*
198410
04/05/99
$255.00
Government Finance Offic
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
554258
FINANCE
DUES & SUBSCRI
< *>
$255.00*
198411
04/05/99
$631.23
GRAINGER
Shop cabinet
49571287
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
1465
04/05/99
$155.94
GRAINGER
GENERAL SUPPLIES
49571585
FIELD MAINTENA
GENERAL SUPPLI
1444
04/05/99
$271.73
GRAINGER
Convex mirror
49571871
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
1486
< *>
$1,058.90*
198412
04/05/99
$81.00
Grand Pere Wines Inc
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
5463
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
< *>
$81.00*
198413
04/05/99
$60.00
GRAND VIEW LODGE
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
031899
POLICE DEPT. G
CONF & SCHOOLS
< *>
$60.00*
198414
04/05/99
$166.00
GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC
COST OF GOODS SOLD "WI
23589
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
04/05/99
$213.00
GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
23590
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
04/05/99
$656.00
GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
23746
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
04/05/99
$456.00
GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
23747
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
< *>
$1,491.00*
198415
04/05/99
$2.88
GRAUSAM, STEVE
TELEPHONE.
031599
YORK OCCUPANCY
TELEPHONE
< *>
$2.88*
198416
04/05/99
$91.09
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO.
Electrical supplies
10441012
BUILDING MAINT
REPAIR PARTS
1254
04/05/99
$96.43
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10441170
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPLI
1351
04/05/99
$4,313.25
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO.
Light poles
10441360
ST LIGHTING OR
REPAIR PARTS
9221
04/05/99
$78.03
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO.
Wire i
10441170
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPLI
1351
04/05/99
$28.42
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO.
REPAIR PARTS
10442093
CENTENNIAL LAK
REPAIR PARTS
1612
04/05/99
$72.45
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO.
Bulbs
10442118
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPLI
1612
< *>
$4,679.67*
198417
04/05/99
$35.00
GREEN, DICK
Program
041599
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$35.00*
198418
04/05/99
.$920.83
GREER, PAT
Programmer
APRIL 19
ED ADMINISTRAT
PROF SERVICES
i
COUNCIL CH�EGISTER
31 -MAR -1999 (06) page 15
CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM--- - - - - -- OBJECT-- - - - -PO -NUM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<*> $920.83*
198419 04/05/99
198423
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
198424 04/05/99
198425 04/05/99
198426 04/05/99
198427 04/05/99
$25.00 GRIFFITHS, GEORDIE AC service 032999 ART CENTER ADM PROF.SERVICES
$25.00*
- $50.00
$2,411.32
$6,348.40
$37.74
$14.80
- $84.50
- $34.20
- $135.90
$482.25
$1,976.21
$1,534.95
$23.00
$964.50
$136.50
$185.00
$5,866.01
- $186.95
- $18.45
- $140.00
- $350.00
- $33.45
-$9.69
-$3.80
- $93.59
$87.00
$2,827.54
$24.45
$3,007.61
$5,455.25
$77.55
-$5.74
$1,622.15
$1,626.27
$26.04
$3,417.13
$130.30
- $47.10
$37,088.60*
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
$56.55 Gritton, Kay
$56.55*
$40.00 Grube, Mike
$40.00;.
GTE Directories Corporat ADVERTISING OTHER
$56.30
$56.30*
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 104791
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 22392
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 22394
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 23192
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 23194
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 105159
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 105288
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 105423
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 25176
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 25180
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 25183
COST OF, GOODS SOLD MI 25184
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 25185
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 25186
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 25188
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 25189
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 105583
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 105717
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 105719
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 105720
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 105721
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 105723
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 105724
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 105880
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 27878
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 27879
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 27883
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 27884
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 27887
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 27889
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 106174
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 30724
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 30726
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 30727
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 30729
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 31095
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 106550
YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
BOTH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU
BOTH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX
YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
BOTH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU
YORK SELLING CST -OF GD LIQU
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
BOTH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU
YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
BOTH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU
BOTH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX
YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
Art work sold 031899 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER
Instructor 2 lessons 031899 GOLF DOME PROF SERVICES
$42.90 Guest, Lisa
$42.90*
Art work sold
I
030399 ART CENTER ADM ADVERT OTHER
031899 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER
8256
'OUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
31 -MAR -1999 (18:46) page 16
'HECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT PO NUM
--------------------------------------------------------------------.---------------------------------------------------------------
198428
04/05/99
$35.38
H D HUDSON MFG CO
Sprayer
5286951
POOL TRACK GRE
GENERAL SUPPLI 1583
< *>
$35.38*
198429
04/05/99
$35.00
HALL,.MARILYN
Program
042099
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$35.00*
198430
04/05/99
$35.00
HALL, MARILYN
Program
050499
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$35.00*
198431
04/05/99
$387.73
HALLMAN OIL COMPANY
15w -40 oil
14601.
EQUIPMENT OPER
LUBRICANTS 9926
04/05/99
$384.73'
HALLMAN OIL COMPANY
SW 30 Oil
14621
EQUIPMENT OPER
LUBRICANTS 9926
04/05/99
$474.25
HALLMAN OIL .COMPANY
Supplies
15799
MAINT OF COURS
GENERAL SUPPLI 1303
04/05/99
$227.98
HALLMAN OIL COMPANY.
Pump motor oil
14810
PUMP & LIFT ST
GENERAL SUPPLI 1253
04/05/99
$83.99
HALLMAN OIL COMPANY
Washer fluid
16077
EQUIPMENT OPER
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$1,558.68*
198432
04/05/99
$31.31
Hamco Data Products
Credit card ribbon
991682
YORK SELLING
GENERAL SUPPLI
04/05/99
$31.31
Hamco Data Products
Credit card ribbon
991682
50TH ST SELLIN
GENERAL SUPPLI
04/05/99
$31.31
Hamco Data Products
Credit card ribbon
991682
VERNON SELLING
GENERAL SUPPLI
04/05/99
$47.87
Hamco Data Products
Fax film ribbon
992056
LIQUOR 50TH ST
OFFICE SUPPLIE
04/05/99
$47.87
Hamco Data Products
Fax film ribbon
992056
LIQUOR YORK GE
'OFFICE SUPPLIE
-
04/05/99
$47.88
Hamco Data Products
Fax film ribbon
992056
VERNON LIQUOR
OFFICE SUPPLIE
< *>
$237.55*
198433
04/05/99
$30.36
HAMMER, NANCY
Art work sold
031899
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
< *>
$30.36*
198434
04/05/99
$818.64
HARMON FULL SERVICE GROU
Door repairs
24008628
POOL TRACK GRE
CONTR REPAIRS 8446
< *>
$818.64*
I
198435
04/05/99
$21.74
HAROLD CHEVROLET
Coil wire
906118
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS- 9918
< *>
$21.74*
198436
04/05/99
$14,491.00
HARRIS - HOMEYER CO.
INSURANCEI
022599
CENT SVC GENER
INSURANCE
04/05/99.
$16,963.00
HARRIS HOMEYER CO.
INSURANCE
022599
CENT SVC GENER
INSURANCE
04/05/99
$1,033.00
HARRIS HOMEYER CO.
INSURANCE''
022599
CENT SVC GENER
INSURANCE
04/05/99
$133.00
HARRIS HOMEYER CO.
INSURANCE
022599
CENT SVC GENER
INSURANCE
< *>
$32,620.00*
198437
04/05/99
$8,425.78
Hartland Fuel Products L
GASOLINE
286178
EQUIPMENT OPER
GASOLINE
04/05/99
$4,024.40
Hartland Fuel Products L
GASOLINE
286208
EQUIPMENT OPER
GASOLINE
< *>
$12,450.18*
198438
04/05/99
$4,864.44
Hawkins Water Treatment
Water.chemicals
494609
WATER TREATMEN
WATER TRTMT SU 6924
04/05/99
$2,208.80
Hawkins Water Treatment
Water chemicals
494894
WATER TREATMEN
WATER TRTMT SU 6924
04/05/99
$543.16
Hawkins Water Treatment
Water chemicals
495217
WATER TREATMEN
WATER TRTMT SU 1399
< *>
$7,616.40*
198439
04/05/99
$510.00
HAYWA, PHYLLIS
AC service
032999
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$510.00*
I
198440
04/05/99
$30.00
HCMC EMS Education
CONFERENCES
& SCHOOLS
032299
POLICE DEPT. G
CONF & SCHOOLS
< *>
$30.00*
198441
04/05/99
$48.75
Heimann, Sara
Art work
bold
031899
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
31 -MAR -1999 (06) page 17
COUNCIL
CHOEGISTER
CHECK NO
DATE CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM_-- - -
- - -- OBJECT-- - - - -PO -NUM
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<*>
$48.75*
198442
04/05/99
$134.10
HEIMARK FOODS
COST OF GOODS SOLD
13389
GRILL COST OF GD SOL 9032
< *>
$134.10*
198443
04/05/99
$52.32
Hennepin County Sheriff'
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
030999
POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP MAINT
< *>
$52.32*
198444
04/05/99
$651.00
HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURE
Special processing
44720
SPECIAL ASSESS
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$651.00*
198445
04/05/99
$3,174.75
HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURE
BOARD & ROOM PRISONER
032199
LEGAL SERVICES
BRD & RM PRISO
< *>
$3,174.75*
198446
04/05/99
$46.84
Hennepin County
Computer data
195
SUMP PUMP INSP
CIP
< *>
$46.84*
198447
04/05/99
$106.50
HERC -U -LIFT
Tool tray
01E48023
POOL TRACK GRE
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$106.50*
198448
04/05/99
$200.98
HIAWATHA LUMBER CO
Water rescue supplies
092638
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI 9953
< *>
$200.98*
198449
04/05/99
$35.00
Hodges, Trish
AC service
032999
MEDIA LAB
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$35.00*
198450
04/05/99
$1,410.65
HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
031099
ADMINISTRATION
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$1,410.65*
198451
04/05/99
$38.70
Home Juice
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
31609
VERNON SELLING.CST
VERNON SELLING
OF GDS BEE
CST OF GDS MIX
04/05/99
$58.95
Home Juice
COST OF
GOODS SOLD MI
31648
< *>
$97.65*
198452
04/05/99
$319.50
Honeywell Inc
Monitoring stat 2
408PS373
FIRE DEPT. GEN
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$319.50*
1
198453
04/05/99
$189.00
Horizon CPO Seminars
CPO seminar
CP009900
ED ADMINISTRAT
CONF & SCHOOLS
< *>
$189.00*
198454
04/05/99
$90.00
HOULE, JEANNIE
AC service
032999
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$90.00*
198455
04/05/99
$42.58
HOULE, WAYNE D.
Postcards
031799
ST MILL OVERLA
CIP
< *>
$42.58*
198456
04/05/99
$200,000.00
HRA /CITY OF EDINA
HRA transfer
031699
GENERAL FD PRO
DUE FROM HRA
< *>
$200,000.00*
198457
04/05/99
$63.96
HTE Inc
Data processing
032699
POLICE DEPT. G
DATA PROCESSIN
< *>
$63.96*
198458
04/05/99
$56.56
HUEBSCH
Towels', rugs
742371
747072
POOL TRACK GRE
POOL TRACK GRE
SVC CONTR EQUI
SVC CONTR EQUI
04/05/99
04/05/99
$8.65
$56.56
HUEBSCH
HUEBSCH
Towels
Towels, rugs
751790
POOL TRACK GRE
SVC CONTR EQUI
< *>
$121.77*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
31 -MAR -1999 (18:46) page 18
CHECK NO
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
198459
04/05/99
$82,408.00
HUNERBERG CONSTRUCTION C
Shelter bldg construc
11
PKBOND CIP
EQUIP REPLACEM
< *>
$82,408.00*
198460
04/05/99
$266.25
HYDRANT SPECIALIST
Repair hydrant
2073
DISTRIBUTION
CONTR REPAIRS
2501
< *>
$266.25*
198461
04/05/99
$750.64
HYDRAULIC COMPONENT SERV
Motor & street unit
13825
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
9488
< *>
$750.64*
198462
04/05/99
04/05/99
$4,426.23
HYDRO SUPPLY CO
Water meters
14283
UTILITY PROG
INVENTORY WATE
3553
$5,082.35
HYDRO SUPPLY CO
Water meters
14330
UTILITY PROG
INVENTORY WATE
3553
04/05/99
$483.72
HYDRO SUPPLY CO
Water meters
14331
UTILITY PROG
INVENTORY WATE
3553
< *>
$9,992.30*
198463
04/05/99
$18,202.69
HYDRO SUPPLY
DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM
961PWFNL
UTILITY PROG
DISTRIBUTION S
< *>
$18,202.69*
198464
04/05/99
04/05/99
$130.00
$130.00
IAAO
IAAO
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
030430
ASSESSING
DUES & SUBSCRI
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
2429
ASSESSING
DUES & SUBSCRI
< *>
$260.00*
198465
04/05/99
$806.28
ICMA
ICMA
040599
ADMINISTRATION
DUES & SUBSCRI
< *>
$806.28*
198466
04/05/99
04/05/99
$33.67
Ikon Office Solutions
Copy machine service
329407
ED ADMINISTRAT
SVC CONTR EQUI
04/05/99
$128.56
$21.32
Ikon Office Solutions
Ikon Office Solutions
Toner cartridge fax
Maint
88369A
CENT SVC GENER
OFFICE SUPPLIE
< *>
$183.55*
agreement
341030
PUMP & LIFT ST
GENERAL SUPPLI
5258
198467
04/05/99
$2,010.14
IMC Salt Inc.
Salt
10448913
SNOW & ICE REM
SALT
6578
< *>
$2,010.14 *.
198468
04/05/99
$121.37
IMS /MN
Mailing
labels postag
40027
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$121.37*
198469
04/05/99
$180.00
Independent School Dist
Overtime
1377
EDINA ATHLETIC
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$180.00*
198470
*>
04/05/99
$445.62
INLAND TRUCK PARTS
Shop parts
491068
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1159
<
$445.62*
i
198471
*>
04/05/99
$96.00
INTERLACHEN TRAVEL
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
0945551
POLICE DEPT. G
CONF & SCHOOLS
<
$96.00*
198472
04/05/99
04/05/99
$367.23
INTERSTATE DETROIT DIESE
Trans filters
00174091
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1177
< *>
$434.13
$801.36*
INTERSTATE DETROIT DIESE
Repair 25 -307
00193093
EQUIPMENT OPER
CONTR REPAIRS
1461
198473
04/05/99
04/05/99
$69.22
$139.63
IOS Capital
IOS
Equipment rental
43210182
ART CENTER ADM
EQUIP RENTAL
< *>
$208.85*
Capital
Copy machine lease
43417106
PUMP & LIFT ST
GENERAL SUPPLI
5258
198474
04/05/99
04/05/99
$249.97
J.H. LARSON COMPANY
Electrical supplies
41111370
BUILDING MAINT
REPAIR PARTS
1249
04/05/99
$461.76
$82.35
J.H. LARSON COMPANY
J.H. LARSON COMPANY
Electrical parts
Electrical supplies
41113820
41115550
PUMP & LIFT ST
CITY
REPAIR PARTS
1255
HALL GENE
REPAIR PARTS
1265
I
• 31 -MAR -1999 (0) page 19
COUNCIL CHk#EGISTER
CHECK NO DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
JERRY'S
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM--- - -
- - -- OBJECT-- - - -
-PO -NUM
--------------------------------------------------
198474 04/05/99
$128.53
J.H.
LARSON
COMPANY
Electrical
supplies
41120140
CITY HALL GENE
ST LIGHTING OR
REPAIR PARTS
GENERAL SUPPLI
139
1409
04/05/99
$7.98
J.H.
LARSON
COMPANY
COMPANY
Electrical
Electrical
supplies
supply
41122420
41126300
BUILDINGS
REPAIR PARTS
1434
04/05/99
04/05/99
$347.92
$129.21
J.H.
J.H.
LARSON
LARSON
COMPANY
Electrical
supplies
41129301
ST LIGHTING OR
GENERAL SUPPLI
1558
1.188
04/05/99
$223.65
J.H.
LARSON
COMPANY
Electrical
supplies
41108060
CITY HALL GENE
REPAIR PARTS
SUPPLI
< *>
$1,631.37*
04/05/99
CITY HALL GENE
GENERAL
SUPPLI
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
022899
PW BUILDING
GENERAL
198475
04/05/99
JERRY'S
HARDWARE
198476
04/05/99
JERRY'S
HARDWARE
198478
04/05/99
JERRY'S
04/05/99
JERRY'S
04/05/99
JERRY'S
04/05/99
JERRY'S
04/05/99
JERRY'S
04/05/99
JERRY'S
04/05/99
JERRY'S
04/05/99
JERRY'S
04/05/99
JERRY'S
04/05/99
JERRY'S
04/05/99
JERRY'S
04/05/99
JERRY'S
04/05/99
JERRY'S
04/05/99
JERRY'S
04/05/99
YORK FIRE STAT
04/05/99
SUPPLI
04/05/99
SUPPLIES
04/05/99
FIRE DEPT. GEN
04/05/99
SUPPLI
GENERAL
198479
04/05/99
PUBLIC HEALTH
04/05/99
SUPPLI
GENERAL
198480
04/05/99
CITY HALL GENE
GENERAL
198483 04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
$1,667.39 JAMIESON AND ASSOCIATES AV consulting 99932 COMMUNICATIONS PROF SERVICES
$1,667.39*
$15.00 Jegers, Zigrida
$15.00*
$18.59
$105.79
$5.54
$110.52
$15.26
$56.20
$72.05
$78.18
$5.60
$24.19
$3.46
$226.41
$317.23
$24.15
$65.36
$101.16
$110.69
$16.16
$7.70
$1,364.24*
$977.90
$24.50
$1,002.40*
$215.38
$215.38*
$2,033.89
$149.12
- $192.51
- $167.65
- $69.57
-$5.51
$510.57
$1,603.10
$3,838.70
$9,729.05
$3,.677.29
$2,236.40
- $349.50
$1,480.99
JERRY'S
HARDWARE
JERRY'S
HARDWARE
JERRY'S
HARDWARE
JERRY'S
HARDWARE
JERRY'S
HARDWARE
JERRY'S
HARDWARE
JERRY'S
HARDWARE
JERRY'S
HARDWARE
JERRY'S
HARDWARE
JERRY'S
HARDWARE
JERRY'S
HARDWARE
JERRY'S
HARDWARE
JERRY'S
HARDWARE
JERRY'S
HARDWARE
JERRY'S
HARDWARE
JERRY'S
HARDWARE
JERRY'S
HARDWARE
JERRY'S
HARDWARE
JERRY'S
HARDWARE
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 031299 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS
GENERALISUPPLIES
022899
ENGINEERING GE
GENERAL
SUPPLI
GENERAL'
SUPPLIES
022899
GENERAL MAINT
GENERAL
SUPPLI
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
022899
ST LIGHTING OR
GENERAL
SUPPLI
GENERAL'
SUPPLIES
022899
STREET NAME SI
GENERAL
SUPPLI
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
022899
STREET REVOLVI
GENERAL
SUPPLI
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
022899
POLICE DEPT. G
GENERAL
SUPPLI
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
022899
YORK FIRE STAT
GENERAL
SUPPLI
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
022899
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL
SUPPLI
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
022899
PUBLIC HEALTH
GENERAL
SUPPLI
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
022899
CITY HALL GENE
GENERAL
SUPPLI
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
022899
PW BUILDING
GENERAL
SUPPLI
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
022899
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL
SUPPLI
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
022899
GOLF ADMINISTR
GENERAL
SUPPLI
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
022899
ARENA ICE MAIN
GENERAL
SUPPLI
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
022899
ART CENTER BLD
GENERAL
SUPPLI
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
022899
ED BUILDING &
GENERAL
SUPPLI
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
022899
PUMP & LIFT ST
GENERAL
SUPPLI
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
022899
50TH ST OCCUPA
GENERAL
SUPPLI
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
022899
YORK OCCUPANCY
GENERAL
SUPPLI
JERRY'S TRANSMISSION SER Art electrcial work 853
JERRY'S TRANSMISSION SER 394 repairs 12179
JIM HATCH SALES Stock 9284
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 948706
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 0951093
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 84814
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 84815
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 84816
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 84817
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 953321
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 953322
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 953323
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 953324
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 953325
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 953326
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 85247
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 954588
EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 8669
FIRE DEPT. GEN CONTR REPAIRS
GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 1214
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU
YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
)UNCIL CHECK REGISTER
IECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT
•--------- ---------------- - - - - --
.98483 04/05/99 $1,480.99
04/05/99 $1,480.99
04/05/99 $1,-157.97
04/05/99 $1,334.80
04/05/99 $2,558.07
04/05/99 $4,673.30
04/05/99 $2,772.68
04/05/99 $1,816.50
04/05/99 $2,211.15
04/05/99 $1,935.38
04/05/99 $5,953.75
04/05/99 $2,583.05
04/05/99 $3,461.42
04/05/99 $2,528.60
04/05/99 $101.99
04/05/99 $132.40
< *> $60,657.41*
L98484 04/05/99 $137.53
< *> $137.53*
L98485 04/05/99 $33.50
04/05/99 $27.38
04/05/99 $79.42
04/05/99 $43.40
04/05/99 $26.44
04/05/99 $67.14
< *> $277.28*
98486 04/05/99 $74.75
< *> $74.75*
.98487 04/05/99 $181.32
04/05/99 $16.50
< *> $197.82*
.98488 04/05/99 $296.00
< *> $296.00*
98489 04/05/99 $190.00
< *> $190.00*
:98490 04/05/99 $2.73
04/05/99 $59.68
04/05/99 $76.47
04/05/99 $84.02
04/05/99 $43.33
04/05/99 $189.96
04/05/99 $81.40
04/05/99 $98.28
< *> $635.87*
'98491 04/.05/99 $63.96
04/05/99 $45.36
< *> $109.32*
VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE
------------------ 7 --------- =-------------------------
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 954589
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 954590
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 955611
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 955612
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 955613
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 955614
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 955615
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 955616
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 958328
JOHNSON. BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 958329
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 958330
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 958331
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 958332
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 958333
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 958412
JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 958781
Johnson Wholesale Floris Greenhouse supplies 90917
JOHNSON, NAOMI Art work sold 032999
JOHNSON, NAOMI OFFICE SUPiPLIES 032999
JOHNSON, NAOMI CRAFT SUPPLIES 032999
JOHNSON, NAOMI GENERAL.SUPPLIES 032999
JOHNSON, NAOMI GENERAL SUPPLIES 032999
JOHNSON, NAOMI GENERAL SU i PPLIES 032999
1
Johnson, Phil Internet access 022299
l
JOHNSON, STEVE GENERAL SUPPLIES 030999
JOHNSON, STEVE Box lunches 032499
Jonas, Lenore AC service) 032999
JORDAN BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 56647
JUSTUS LUMBER Lumber for complex 82882
JUSTUS LUMBER Bldg materials 81424
JUSTUS LUMBER Bldg supplies 81432
JUSTUS LUMBER Misc bldglsupplies 81524
JUSTUS LUMBER Tools 82074
JUSTUS LUMBER Bldg suppllies 82076
JUSTUS LUMBER Lumber for complex 82471
JUSTUS LUMBER Lumber for complex 82723
Kaman Industrial Technol REPAIR PARTS Z168838
Kaman Industrial Technol REPAIR PARTS Z168841
31 -MAR -1999 (18:46) page 20
PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM
-----------------------------------------
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
SOTH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
GENERAL TURF C GENERAL SUPPLI 1416
ART CNTR.PROG SALES OTHER
ART CENTER ADM OFFICE SUPPLIE
ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES
ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI
ART SUPPLY GIF GENERAL SUPPLI
MEDIA LAB GENERAL SUPPLI
MEDIA LAB PROF SERVICES
SNOW & ICE REM GENERAL SUPPLI
TRAINING CONF & SCHOOLS
ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
BUILDING MAINT LUMBER 1277
BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 1032
BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 1032
BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 1089
BUILDING MAINT TOOLS 1559
BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 1198
BUILDING MAINT LUMBER 1251
BUILDING MAINT LUMBER 1273
MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS.
MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 1311
31 -MAR -1999 40 page 21
COUNCIL CHE#EGISTER 0
CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM
-------- - OBJECT
--- - - -PO- NUM
- - --
_ __ _ ---------------------------------
----------------------------------------- - - - - PP
198492 04/05/99 $91.72 KAR PRODUCTS Shop supplies 231635 MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPLI 1118
< *> $91.72*
198493 04/05/99
198494 04/05/99
198495 04/05/99
04/05/99
198497 04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
198498 04/05/99
198499 04/05/99
198501
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
$8.91 KATTLEMAN, DALE
$8.91*
$34.31 KEPRIOS, JOHN
$34.31*
$9.49
$3.16
$12.65*
$694.35
$19.00
$1,492.60
$3,245.20
$334 . 00
$992.00
- $81.51
$945.25
$811.30
$2,031.55
- $70.80
- $40.00
$48.80
$1,009.96
$659.60
$976.30
$199.50
$1,763.40
$15,030.50*
$107.21
$107.21*
$55.25
$55.25*
$66.10
$4.43
$178.16
$156.81
$31.82
$43.06
$162.47
$14.27
$20.45
$82.24
$79.09
$7.91
$102.12
$18.18
$61.08
- $20.64
KINKO'S
KINKO'S
Kiwi Kai Imports Inc
Kiwi Kai Imports Inc
Kiwi Kai Imports Inc
Kiwi Kai Imports Inc
Kiwi Kai Imports Inc
Kiwi Kai Imports Inc
Kiwi Kai Imports Inc
Kiwi Kai Imports Inc
Kiwi Kai Imports Inc
Kiwi Kai Imports Inc
Kiwi Kai Imports Inc
Kiwi Kai Imports Inc
Kiwi Kai Imports Inc
Kiwi Kai Imports Inc
Kiwi Kai Imports Inc
Kiwi Kai Imports Inc
Kiwi Kai Imports Inc
Kiwi Kai Imports Inc
KLINGELHOETS, DON
Kloppmann, Maren
KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT
KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT
KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT
KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT
KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT
KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT
KNOX.COMMERCIAL CREDIT
KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT
KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT
KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT
KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT
KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT
KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT
KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT
KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT
KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT
Art work sold
031999
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
MEETING EXPENSE
030999
PARK ADMIN.
MEETING EXPENS
PRINTING
06220002
POLICE DEPT. G
PRINTING
PRINTING
06220002
POLICE DEPT. G
PRINTING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 105489
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 105490
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 105491
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 105501
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 105556
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 105559
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI CM310
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 105867
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 105870
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 105871
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 317
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 317.
Credit taken twice 031899
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 106230
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 106232
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 106233
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 106234
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 106311
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 032499
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
GOLF ADMINISTR CONF & SCHOOLS
ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER
BUILDINGS TOOLS
BUILDINGS GENERAL SUPPLI
CLUB HOUSE GENERAL SUPPLI
ARENA BLDG /GRO CONTR REPAIRS
CLUB HOUSE GENERAL SUPPLI
BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI
ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPLI
BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI
POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI
BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI
BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI
GENERAL MAINT TOOLS
GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI
BUILDING MAINT TOOLS
BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI
BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI
9635
9710
9700
1134
9700
1197
1225
1242
1346
1258
1263
9636
1264
1268
Art work sold
031899
TOOLS
365248
Brushes
365503
GENERAL SUPPLIES
367185
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
367687
GENERAL SUPPLIES
367784
Misc hardware
368190
GENERAL SUPPLIES
368256
Misc hardware
368294
GENERAL SUPPLIES
368456
Misc hardware
368560
Misc Hardware
368646
Router base
368665
Carpenter shop stock
368667
Tools)
368704
GENERAL SUPPLIES
369220
GENERAL SUPPLIES
369279
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
GOLF ADMINISTR CONF & SCHOOLS
ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER
BUILDINGS TOOLS
BUILDINGS GENERAL SUPPLI
CLUB HOUSE GENERAL SUPPLI
ARENA BLDG /GRO CONTR REPAIRS
CLUB HOUSE GENERAL SUPPLI
BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI
ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPLI
BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI
POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI
BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI
BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI
GENERAL MAINT TOOLS
GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI
BUILDING MAINT TOOLS
BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI
BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI
9635
9710
9700
1134
9700
1197
1225
1242
1346
1258
1263
9636
1264
1268
!OUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
31 -MAR -1999 (18:46) page 22
:HECK NO
- - - - - --
DATE
- - - - - --
CHECK AMOUNT
- - --
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
198501
040599
$24.75
--- --------------------------g---------------------------------------------------------
KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT
Bldg materials
369280
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
----- - - - - --
1401
04/05/99
KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT
Brian
369410
BUILDING MAINT
TOOLS
1400
< *>
$1,194.37*
198502
04/05/99
$252.00
KOCHENASH, RICK
AC service
032999
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$252.00*
198503
04/05/99
$5,000.00
KPMG PEAT MARWICK
PROFESSIONAL
SERV
- A
040599
FINANCE
PRO SVC AUDIT
04/05/99
$1,000.00
KPMG PEAT MARWICK
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
040599
CDBG
PROF SERVICES
04/05/99
$400.00
KPMG PEAT MARWICK
PROFESSIONAL SERV
- A
040599
ART CENTER ADM
PRO SVC AUDIT
04/05/99
$1,500.00
KPMG PEAT MARWICK
PROFESSIONAL SERV
- A
040599
GOLF ADMINISTR
PRO SVC AUDIT
04/05/99
$1,400.00
KPMG PEAT MARWICK
PROFESSIONAL SERV
- A
040599
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC AUDIT
04/05/99
$1,900.00
KPMG PEAT MARWICK
PROFESSIONAL SERV
- A
040599
LIQUOR 50TH ST
PRO SVC AUDIT
04/05/99
04/05/99
$1,900.00
KPMG PEAT MARWICK
PROFESSIONAL SERV
- A
040599
LIQUOR YORK GE
PRO SVC AUDIT
$1,900.00
KPMG PEAT MARWICK
PROFESSIONAL SERV
- A
040599
VERNON LIQUOR
PRO SVC AUDIT
< *>
$15,000.00*
198504
04/05/99
$1,562.80
KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
BE
233745
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
04/05/99
$2,100.25
KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO
COST OF GOODS SOLD
BE
233872
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
04/05/99
$19.00
KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO
COST OF GOODS SOLD
BE
234145
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
04/05/99
$558.15
KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO
COST OF GOODS SOLD
BE
234341
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
04/05/99
$653.70
KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO
COST OF GOODS SOLD
BE
234410
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
< *>
$4,893.90*
198505
04/05/99
$1,919.00
LABOR RELATIONS ASSOCIAT
Fee for service
020199
ADMINISTRATION
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$1,919.00*
198506
*>
04/05/99
$100.00
LACASSE, ANDREW J.
Services
042299
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
<
$100.00*
198507
*>
04/05/99
$109.60
LAKELAND FLORIST
Plant hol
ers
312413
POOL TRACK GRE
GENERAL SUPPLI
1613
<
$109.60*
198508
*>
04/05/99
$400.00
Lakeside Equipment Inc
Electrical
switch
25554
WATER TREATMEN
REPAIR PARTS
9985
<
$400.00*
198509
04/05/99
04/05/99
$639.00
$639.00
LANO EQUIPMENT
LANO
Rental
6279
GENERAL MAINT
EQUIP RENTAL
1693
< *>
$1,278.00*
EQUIPMENT
Rental
6345
GENERAL MAINT
EQUIP RENTAL
1693
198510
04/05/99
$29.95
LAWRENCE, JEANNE
Art work
sold
031899
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
< *>
$29.95*
.
198511
04/05/99
04/05/99
$157.40
$420.41
LAWSON PRODUCTS INC.
LAWSON
Shop supp ies
1025046
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
9945
04/05/99
$45.17
PRODUCTS INC.
LAWSON PRODUCTS INC.
Stock
Stock
1025954
STREET NAME SI
GENERAL SUPPLI
1083
04/05/99
$112.37
LAWSON PRODUCTS INC.
Bolts
1025955
1026199
EQUIPMENT OPER
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
ACCESSORIES
1083
9850
04/05/99
04/05/99
$440.99
$122.73
LAWSON PRODUCTS INC.
LAWSON
Stock
1029775
ED BUILDING &
REPAIR PARTS
1256
04/05/99
$40.63
PRODUCTS INC.
LAWSON
Stock
1029776
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
1257
04/05/99
$413.39
PRODUCTS INC.
LAWSON PRODUCTS INC.
Shop parts
Nuts & bojts
1030692
EQUIPMENT OPER
TOOLS
1272
04/05/99
$456.28
LAWSON PRODUCTS INC.
Bolts 1
1030693
1031550
CENTENNIAL LAK
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPLI
GENERAL SUPPLI
1271
1271
04/05/99
04/05/99
$232.87
LAWSON PRODUCTS INC.
Hardware for stock
1034462
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
1403
04/05/99
$151.12
$471.24
LAWSON PRODUCTS INC.-
LAWSON
Stock sho
1035641
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
1402
PRODUCTS INC.
Stock
1035642
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1404
31 -MAR -1999 ( page 23
.COUNCIL CHIOGISTER
.46)
'CHECK NO
DATE CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM--- - -
- - -- OBJECT-- - - -
-PO -NUM
--------------------------------------------------------------------.------------------------.---
<*>
$3,064.60*
198512
04/05/99
$40.40
LEEF BROS. INC.
LAUNDRY
022899 /G
MAINT OF COURS
LAUNDRY
< *>
$40.40*
198513
04/05/99
$2,529.80
LEMCO HYDRAULICS
Laoder work
0211
EQUIPMENT OPER
CONTR REPAIRS
9803
04/05/99
$2,900.00
LEMCO HYDRAULICS
Clam repair
021199
EQUIPMENT OPER
CONTR REPAIRS
9475
< *>
$5,429.80*
198514
04/05/99
$821.65
LESSMAN, GREG
COST OF
GOODS - PRO S
16143
PRO SHOP
COST OF GDS -PR
8023
< *>
$821.65*
1
198515
04/05/99
$687.50
LIGHT CYCLE INC
Light recycling
402
SUPERV. & OVRH
HAZ. WASTE DIS
1398
< *>
$687.50*
198516
04/05/99
$72.87
LIGHTING PLASTICS OF
MIN.
Lighting supplies
067089
CITY HALL GENE
REPAIR PARTS
1015
< *>
$72.87*
198517
04/05/99
$1,212.86
LINEAR DYNAMICS INC
Spray gun
154523
PAVEMENT MARKI
PAINT
9522
< *>
$1,212.86*
196518
04/05/99
$27.18
LINHOFF
CRAFT SUPPLIES
022899
ART CENTER ADM
CRAFT SUPPLIES
< *>
$27.18*
198519
04/05/99
$6,732.67
LOGIS
DATA PROCESSING
AR0299
FINANCE
DATA PROCESSIN
04/05/99
$2,620.66
LOGIS
DATA PROCESSING
AR0299
ASSESSING
DATA PROCESSIN
04/05/99
$4,697.35
LOGIS
DATA PROCESSING
AR0299
GENERAL(BILLIN
DATA PROCESSIN
04/05/99
$251.72
LOGIS
DATA PROCESSING
AR0299
COMMUNICATIONS
DATA PROCESSIN
04/05/99
$364.34
LOGIS
DATA PROCESSING
AR0299
POLICE DEPT. G
DATA PROCESSIN
04/05/99
$1,159.50
LOGIS
DATA PROCESSING
AR0299
CENT SVC GENER
DATA PROCESSIN
04/05/99
$35.67
LOGIS
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AR0299
ENGINEERING GE
PROF SERVICES
04/05/99
$231.85
LOGIS
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AR0299
COMMUNICATIONS
PROF SERVICES
04/05/99
$214.02
LOGIS
DATA PROCESSING
AR0299
MEDIA LAB
DATA PROCESSIN
< *>
$16,307.78*
198520
04/05/99
$5,757.51
LONG LAKE TRACTOR &
EQUI
Trans overhaul
R606
EQUIPMENT OPER
CONTR REPAIRS
9788
04/05/99
$301.15
LONG LAKE TRACTOR &
EQUI
Tractorrepair
R623
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1173
< *>
$6,058.66*
198521
04/05/99
$21.60
Lowell's
Brake cleaner
7414513
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1431
< *>
$21.60*
198522
04/05/99
$32.99
LUND, KAREN
Art work sold
.031899
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
< *>
$32.99*
198523
04/05/99
$42.25
LUNDGREN, BARBARA
Art work sold
031899
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
< *>
$42.25*
198524
04/05/99
$12.55
LUTZ, R. MICHAEL
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 031099
POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS
< *>
$12.55*
198525
04/05/99
$6,639.98
LYLE SIGNS INC.
Sign material
63677
STREET NAME SI SIGNS & POSTS
9498
< *>
$6,639.98*
ii
198526
04/05/99
$41,824.20
Magney Construction
Inc
CONTRAC TED REPAIRS
PW98 -3 #4
WATER TREATMEN CONTR REPAIRS
OUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 31 -MAR -1999 (18:46) page 24
HECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM
------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<*> $41,824.20*
198527 04/05/99
198528 04/05/99
04/05/99
198531
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
98532 04/05/99
98533 04/05/99
98534 04/05/99
98535 04/05/99
98536 04/05/99
$120.67
$120.67*
$5,180.00
$16.00
$5,196.00*
$352.50
$2,853.92
$40.15
$188.40
$28.50
$841.15
$21.85
$9.00
$73.15
$1,586.57
$18.00
$23.00
$46.70
$2,940.88
$27.90
$34.20
$1,018.99
$38.15
$9.00
$1,217.65
$18.40
$1,770.45
$69.90
$9.00
$36.80
$1,336.10
$2,946.40
$55.95
$87.80
$1,607.17
$7.50
$19,315.13*
Mainly Baskets
MARK VII
SALES
MARK VII
SALES
MARK VII
SALES
MARK VII
SALES
MARK VII
SALES
MARK VII
SALES
MARK VII
SALES
MARK VII
SALES
MARK VII
SALES
MARK VII
SALES
MARK VII
SALES
MARK VII
SALES
MARK VII
SALES
MARK VII
SALES
MARK VII
SALES
MARK VII
SALES
MARK VII
SALES
MARK VII
SALES
MARK VII
SALES
MARK VII
SALES
MARK VII
SALES
MARK VII
SALES
MARK VII
SALES
MARK VII
SALES
MARK VII
SALES
MARK VII
SALES
MARK VII
SALES
MARK VII
SALES
MARK VII
SALES
MARK VII
SALES
MARK VII
SALES
$221.62 Master Distributors Inc
$221.62*
$208.61 MATHISON CO, THE
$208.61*
Display items 97567 PRO SHOP GENERAL SUPPLI 9446
Fee for service 012599
MEETING EXPENSE 1160
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 877840
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 877970
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 877971
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 877972
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 722
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 880163
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 880164
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 880165
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 880290
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 880291
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 880292
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 880293
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 880318
COST OF "GOODS SOLD BE 880447
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 880448
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 880449
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 882804
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 882805
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 882806
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 882807
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 882808
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 882809
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 882810
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 882811
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 882812
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 882956
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 882971
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 882972
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 882973
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE.885487
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 885488
Litter pil,kers 10896
I
COST OF GOODS SOLD
I
$98.00 Matrix Communications In PW service
$98.00*
$429.22 MATRX MEDICAL INC
$429.22*
$954.66 MCCAREN DESIGN
ADMINISTRATION PROF SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION MEETING EXPENS
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE .
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
VERNON SELLING CST, OF GDS MIX
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE.
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 1438
1540460 ART SUPPLY GIF COST OF GD SOL 1065
35674 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE
Ambulance supplies 655833 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 9953
TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUB 9158 POOL TRACK GRE TREES FLWR SHR 9963
31 -MAR -1999 (�46) page 25
COUNCIL
CHE#EGISTER
CHECK NO
DATE CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
------------------------------------------------------------------7-----------------------------------------
<*>
$954.66*
198537
04/05/99
$45.00
McClintock, Kathleen
AC service
032999
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$45.00*
198538
04/05/99
$24.74
MCKENZIE, TOM
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
032299
POLICE DEPT. G
UNIF ALLOW
< *>
$24.74*
198539
04/05/99
$24.99
MCPHERSON, JOHN
Uniforms
031599
CENTENNIAL LAX
LAUNDRY
< *>
$24.99*
198540
04/05/99
$4,242.52
MEDICA
HOSPITALIZATION
19909112
CENT SVC GENER
HOSPITALIZATIO
< *>
$4,242.52*
198541
04/05/99
$81,219.89
MEDICA
HOSPITALIZATION
19909110
CENT SVC GENER
HOSPITALIZATIO
< *>
$81,219.89*
198542
04/05/99
$161.81
MEDZIS, ANDREW
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
032399
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
04/05/99
$186.35
MEDZIS, ANDREW
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
032399
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$348.16*
198543
04/05/99
$45.00
MEICHSNER, EARL
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
032299
LABORATORY
CONF & SCHOOLS
04/05/99
$117.00
MEICHSNER, EARL
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
032299
LABORATORY
CONF & SCHOOLS
< *>
$162.00*
198544
04/05/99
$38.60
MENARDS ACCT #35170288
GENERAL - SUPPLIES
45084
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPLI
1298
04/05/99
$104.67
MENARDS ACCT #35170288
Christmas decorations
32412
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPLI
8162
< *>
$143.27*
198545
04/05/99
$204.59
MENARDS * ACCT #30240251
Misc building supplie
96108
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
1202
04/05/99
$37.17
MENARDS * ACCT #30240251
Forestry room supplie
96262
TREES & MAINTE
GENERAL SUPPLI
1248
< *>
$241.76*
198546
04/05/99
$925.70
MERIT SUPPLY
Misc cleaning supplie
50375
POOL TRACK GRE
CLEANING SUPPL
9970
04/05/99
$353.15
MERIT SUPPLY
Stock
50418
PW BUILDING
CLEANING SUPPL
1269
04/05/99
$259.43
MERIT SUPPLY
GENERAL :SUPPLIES
50457
PUMP & LIFT ST
GENERAL SUPPLI
1430
04/05/99
$414.29
MERIT SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
50477
PW BUILDING
CLEANING SUPPL
1445
04/05/99
$668.87
MERIT SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
50495
POOL TRACK GRE
GENERAL SUPPLI
9979
04/05/99
$505.88
MERIT SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
50514
ARENA BLDG /GRO
CLEANING SUPPL
1714
04/05/99
$220.46
MERIT SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
50525
ARENA BLDG /GRO
CLEANING SUPPL
1716
< *>
$3,347.78*
198547
04/05/99
$1,336.00
Metro Cash Register Syst
SERVICE�CONTRACTS EQU
44104
GOLF ADMINISTR
SVC CONTR EQUI
1829
< *>
$1,336.00*
i
198548
04/05/99 $225,192.23
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENV
Sewer service
683703
SEWER TREATMEN
SEWER SVC METR
< *>
$225,192.23*
198549
04/05/99
$33.48
METZGER, MAURE ANN
Art work sold
031899
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
< *>
$33.48*
198550
04/05/99
$60.00
Meyer, Mary Ann
Refund team tennis
031999
GENERAL FD PRO
REGISTRATION F
< *>
$60.Ofl*
198551
04/05/99
$273.59
MID CON SYSTEMS INC
Shop supplies
030810
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
1406
OUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 31 -MAR -1999 (18:46) page 26
HECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<*> $273.59*
198552 04/05/99 $478.52 MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPLY PAPER SUPPLIES 17293 CITY HALL GENE PAPER SUPPLIES 1599
< *> $478.52*
198553 04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
198554 04/05/99
198555 04/05/99
198556 04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
198557 04/05/99
- $28.00
$76.65
$84.60
$120.00
$126.50
$242.15
$97.05
$62.30
$237.65
$1,018.90*
$124'.61
$124.61*
MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI
MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI
MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI
MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI
MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI
MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI
MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI
MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI
MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI
Millr, D A
$41.87 MINN COMM PAGING
$41.87*
$1,095.00 MINNEAPOLIS
$1,080.00 MINNEAPOLIS
$270.00 MINNEAPOLIS
$540.00 MINNEAPOLIS
$2,985.00*
$8,179.38 MINNEAPOLIS
$8,179.38*
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
COST OF GOODS SOLD
COST OF GOODS SOLD
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
Paint
I
Pager rental
& SUBURBAN S Replace service line
& SUBURBAN S Abandon water line
& SUBURBAN S Repair stop box
& SUBURBAN S Dig tap hole
FINANCE DEPA Water purchased
14577117 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
62194029 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX
65137124 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
60065098 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 9046
60065106 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 9046
60494082 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
62197196 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
65139104 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
62868044 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
031899 HEALTH SP ASSM PROF SERVICES
22509603 FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP RENTAL
31469 DISTRIBUTION CONTR REPAIRS 8996
31470 DISTRIBUTION CONTR REPAIRS 8995
31485 DISTRIBUTION CONTR REPAIRS 1521
31486 DISTRIBUTION CONTR REPAIRS 1522
031199 DISTRIBUTION WATER PURCHASE
198558 04/05/99
$37.28
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
0405
POOL OPERATION
HEAT
04/05/99
$89.11
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
040599
BUILDING MAINT
HEAT
04/05/99
$232.57
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
040599
YORK FIRE STAT
HEAT
04/05/99
$106.52
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
040599
BUILDING MAINT
HEAT
04/05/99
$91.13
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
040599
BUILDING MAINT
HEAT
04/05/99
$108.63
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
040599
BUILDING MAINT
HEAT
< *>
$665.24*
$110.00
Minnesota
Collection Ent
Debtor IW # 8021794
8021794
198559
04/05/99
$81.42
MINNESOTA
CERAMIC SUPPLY
COST OF GOODS SOLD
222749
< *>
$81.42*
198560
04/05/99
$390.00
Minnesota
Chapter IAAI
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
032499
< *>
$390.00*
198561
04/05/99
$224.89
MINNESOTA
CLAY USA
COST OF GOODS SOLD
44460
< *>
$224.89*
I
198562
04/05/99
$110.00
Minnesota
Collection Ent
Debtor IW # 8021794
8021794
< *>
$110.00*
198563
04/05/99
$1,200:00
MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF
Lab certification fee
031299
< *>
$1,200.00*
198564
04/05/99
$5,000.00
MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
031999
ART SUPPLY GIF COST OF GD SOL 1508
FIRE DEPT. GEN CONF & SCHOOLS
ART SUPPLY GIF COST OF GD SOL 9833
CENT SVC GENER INSURANCE
LABORATORY DUES & SUBSCRI
PATHS & HARD S PROF SERVICES
1
4
31 -MAR -1999 (p page 27
COUNCIL CH
GISTER
CHECK NO
DATE CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM--- - -
- - -- OBJECT-- - - - -PO -NUM
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
<*>
$5,000.00*
198565
04/05/99
$76.00
MINNESOTA ELEVATOR INC
Elevator service
30349
POOL TRACK GRE
SVC CONTR EQUI
< *>
$76.00*
198566
04/05/99
$260.00
MINNESOTA PARK SUPERVISO
State tournament
605CB
EDINA ATHLETIC
DUES & SUBSCRI
< *>
$260.00*
198567
04/05/99
$932.96
MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPME
Water main supplies
72466
DISTRIBUTION
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPLI 1391
REPAIR PARTS 1295
04/05/99
04/05/99
$61.02
$908.65
MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPME
MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPME
Repair kit
Water system parts
72524
72802
DISTRIBUTION
REPAIR PARTS 1274
< *>
$1,902.63*
198568
04/05/99
$1,230.00
MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONT
Water quality permit
10059609
WATER TREATMEN
WELDING SUPPLI
< *>
$1,230.00*
198569
04/05/99
$410.00
MINNESOTA STATE BAR ASSO
Seminarl
71680980
ADMINISTRATION
CONF & SCHOOLS
< *>
$410.00*
198570
04/05/99
$15.00
Minnesota State Board of
Electrical permit
031799
POLICE DEPT. G
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$15.00*
198571
04/05/99
$109.32
MINNESOTA UC FUND
Unemployment insuranc
032399
CENT SVC GENER
UNEMP COMP
< *>
$109.32*
198572
04/05/99
$20.00
Mitchell /Repair Informat
RADIO SERVICE
5441283
EQUIPMENT OPER
RADIO SERVICE 1572
< *>
$20.00*
198573
04/05/99
$267.20
Mizuno USA Inc
COST OF.GOODS - PRO S
0080624
PRO SHOP
COST OF GDS -PR 6343
COST OF GDS -PR 6343
04/05/99
$393.65
Mizuno USA Inc
COST OF GOODS - PRO S
COST OF GOODS - PRO S
85243
86023
PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP
COST OF GDS -PR 6343
04/05/99
$903.58
Mizuno USA Inc
< *>
$1,564.43*
198574
04/05/99
$40.00
MN PIE
Pesticide re cert
031799
GENERAL TURF C
CONF & SCHOOLS
< *>
$40.00*
198575
04/05/99
$165.08
Mooers Printing Inc
Inspection forms & 10
1101
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI 1367
< *>
$165.08*
198576
04/05/99
$21.66
MOORE MEDICAL
Ambulance supplies
0220478
FIRE DEPT. GEN
FIRST AID SUPP 9950
< *>
$21.66*
198577
04/05/99
$182.81
Mountain High Hosiery
COST OF GOODS - PRO S
53230
PRO SHOP
COST OF GDS -PR 9449
< *>
$182.81*
198578
04/05/99
$60.00
MPGMA
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
030899
GOLF ADMINISTR CONF & SCHOOLS
< *>
$60.00*
198579
04/05/99
$10.00
MRPA
Aquatic survey
032399
POOL ADMIN
CONF & SCHOOLS
< *>
$10.00*
198580
04/05/99
$50.00
MSANI
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 031899
POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS
< *>
$50.00*
MTI DISTRIBUTING CO
REPAIRIPARTS
I263303
CENTENNIAL LAK REPAIR PARTS 1499
198581
04/05_/99
$48.84
:OUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
31- MAR -1999 (18:46) page 28
:HECK NO
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
198581
04/05/99
$294.79
MTI DISTRIBUTING CO
REPAIR PARTS
I263640
CENTENNIAL LAK
REPAIR PARTS
1499
04/05/99
$202.93
MTI DISTRIBUTING CO
REPAIR PARTS
I263877
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS
< *>
$546.56*
198582
04/05/99
$138.75
MUZAK
Music service
217917
CENTENNIAL LAK
SVC CONTR EQUI
< *>
$138.75*
198583
04/05/99
04/05/99
$36.34
$31.63
Napa Auto Parts
Napa
Switch
616588
EQUIPMENT OPER
GENERAL SUPPLI
1166
04/05/99
$19.15
Auto Parts
Napa Auto Parts
Fuse
Belts
616701
EQUIPMENT OPER
GENERAL SUPPLI
1259
04/05/99
$136.50
Napa Auto Parts
Shop parts
620367
017055
EQUIPMENT OPER
EQUIPMENT OPER
GENERAL SUPPLI
REPAIR PARTS
1485
1569
04/05/99
04/05/99
$14.90
$70.25
Napa Auto Parts
Napa
Shop parts
622134
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1723
04/05/99
$50.99
Auto Parts
Napa Auto Parts
Tail light
Shop
622389
622838
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1727
< *>
$359.76*
parts
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1688
198584
04/05/99
$138.51
National Camera Exchange
CRAFT SUPPLIES
7060016
ART CENTER ADM
CRAFT SUPPLIES
9830
< *>
$138.51*
198585
04/05/99
$210.00
NATIONAL GOLF FOUNDATION
Member #1032214
032499
GOLF ADMINISTR
DUES & SUBSCRI
< *>
$210.00*
198586
04/05/99
$452.00
NELSON, BARBARA
AC service
0329
MEDIA LAB
PROF SERVICES
04/05/99
$166.50
NELSON, BARBARA
AC service
032999
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$618.50*
198587
04/05/99
$55.90
NELSON, CHRISTINE
Art work sold
031899
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
< *>
$55.90*
198588
04/05/99
$60.00
NELSON, LARRY
Instructor 3 lessons
031899
GOLF DOME
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$60.00*
198589
04/05/99
$18.43
NIBBE, MICHAEL
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
031099
POLICE DEPT. G
CONF & SCHOOLS
04/05/99
$64.00
NIBBE, MICHAEL
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
032299
POLICE DEPT. G
CONF & SCHOOLS
< *>
$82.43*
198590
04/05/99
$25.87
NICHOLS NET & TWINE INC
String for soccer
008349
FIELD MAINTENA
GENERAL SUPPLI
1443
< *>
$25.87*
198591
04/05/99
$85.00
Nideros Sr Ldg
Peform
041899
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$85.00*
198592
04/05/99
$55.25
NORMAN, MIKE
Art work1sold
031899
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
< *>
$55.25*
198593
04/05/99
$45.00
NORMAN, POLLY
AC service
032999
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
04/05/99
$108.45
NORMAN, POLLY
CRAFT SUPPLIES
032999
ART CENTER ADM
CRAFT SUPPLIES
< *>
$153.45*
198594
04/05/99
$221.76
NORTH STAR ICE
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
76718
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
04/05/99
$30.60
NORTH STAR ICE
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
77122
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MIX
04/05/99
$108.74
NORTH STAR ICE
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
77123
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
04/05/99
$79.60
NORTH STAR ICE
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
77749
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
< *>
$440.70*
j
4b
31 -MAR -1999 (0) page 29
COUNCIL CHE#EGISTER
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM--- - -
- - -- OBJECT-- - - -
-PO -NUM
------------------
198595
-----------------------
04/05/99
- $267.47
------------------------------------------=-----------
NORTH STAR INTERNATIONAL
Credit
224248
225201
EQUIPMENT OPER
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR
REPAIR
PARTS
PARTS
169
9908
04/05/99
$19.22
NORTH STAR INTERNATIONAL
INTERNATIONAL
Insulator
Shop parts
227964
EQUIPMENT OPER.
REPAIR
PARTS
1468
04/05/99
04/05/99
$112.69
$237.40
NORTH STAR
NORTH STAR INTERNATIONAL
Wheel
227938
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR
REPAIR
PARTS
PARTS
1466
1479
04/05/99
$51.07
NORTH STAR INTERNATIONAL
Shop parts
228386
228400
EQUIPMENT OPER
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR
PARTS
1468
04/05/99
- $112.69
NORTH STAR INTERNATIONAL
INTERNATIONAL
Credit
Pin & bracket
228085
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR
PARTS
1469
04/05/99
$413.77
NORTH'STAR
< *>
$453.99*
198596
04/05/99
$139.65
NORTH STAR TURF
REPAIR PARTS
192936
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR
PARTS
1592
< *>
$139.65*
198597
04/05/99
$198.69
NORTHERN SAFETY CO INC
Safety vests
56965600
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
9589
< *>
$198.69*
198598
04/05/99
$403.11
NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY
COST OFIGOODS SOLD
15412400
ART SUPPLY GIF
COST OF
GD SOL
1235
< *>
$403.11*
198599
04/05/99
$77.26
NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO
TIRES & TUBES
53108
53157
EQUIPMENT OPER
SUPERV. & OVRH
TIRES
HAZ. WASTE
& TUBES
DIS
1191
1191
04/05/99
$233.31
NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO
HAZ. WASTE DISPOSAL
53158
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS
1302
04/05/99
$85.16
NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO
CO
Tires
TIRES & TUBES
53301
EQUIPMENT OPER
TIRES
& TUBES
1191
04/05/99
04/05/99
$286.63
$71.04
NORTHWESTERN TIRE
NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO
TIRES & TUBES
53332
EQUIPMENT OPER
TIRES
& TUBES
1191
< *>
$753.40*
198601
04/05/99
$2.50
NSP
LIGHT &' POWER
&
040599
040599
ST LIGHTING OR
TRAFFIC SIGNAL
LIGHT
LIGHT
& POWER
& POWER
04/05/99
$1,065.44
NSP
LIGHT POWER
LIGHT & POWER
040599
PONDS & LAKES
LIGHT
& POWER
04/05/99
04/05/99
$6.99
$2,313.51
NSP
NSP
LIGHT & POWER
040599
PARKING RAMP
LIGHT
& POWER
04/05/99
$43.96
NSP
LIGHT & POWER
040599
040599
CIVIL DEFENSE
CITY HALL GENE
LIGHT
LIGHT
& POWER
& POWER
04/05/99
$31.75
NSP
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
040599
PW BUILDING
LIGHT
& POWER
04/05/99
04/05/99
$35.32
$1,177.16
NSP
NSP
LIGHT & POWER
040599
BUILDING MAINT
LIGHT
& POWER
04/05/99
$1,314.91
NSP
LIGHT & POWER
040599
040599
CLUB HOUSE
POOL OPERATION
LIGHT
LIGHT
& POWER
& POWER
04/05/99
$14.04
NSP
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
040599
PUMP & LIFT ST
LIGHT
& POWER
04/05/99
04/05/99
$1,561.08
$2,876.98
NSP
NSP
LIGHT & POWER
040599
DISTRIBUTION
LIGHT
& POWER
04/05/99
$34.20
NSP
LIGHT & POWER
040599
TANKS TOWERS &
LIGHT
& POWER
04/05/99
$32.03
NSP
LIGHT & POWER
040599
VERNON OCCUPAN
LIGHT
& POWER
04/05/99
$362.62
NSP
LIGHT & POWER
.040599
CENTENNIAL LAK LIGHT
& POWER
< *>
$10,872.49*
198602
04/05/99
$192.00
ODLAND, DOROTHY
AC service
032999
ART CENTER ADM PROF
SERVICES
< *>
$192.00*
198603
04/05/99
$30.00
Olsen, Deb
Refund skating lesson 031699
EDINB /CL PROG
LESSON PRGM IN
< *>
$30.00*
198604
04/05/99
$55.00
OM2 Multimedia Inc
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 1163
POLICE DEPT. G CONF
& SCHOOLS
< *>
$55.00*
198605
04/05/99
$79.00
Otis Spunkmeyer Inc
COST OF GOODS SOLD
8555126
GRILL
COST
OF GD SOL 9037
< *>
$79.00*
198606
04/05/99
$238.49
OWENS SERVICE CO
Boiler chemicals
29203
CITY HALL GENE REPAIR PARTS
1250
)UNCIL CHECK REGISTER
31 -MAR -1999 (18:46) page 30
IECK NO
•-------------------------------------'---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
.98606
04/05/99
$106.43
OWENS SERVICE CO
Mcquay repair
29605
POOL TRACK GRE
CONTR REPAIRS
1907
< *>
04/05/99
$344.92*
04/05/99
98613
04/05/99
.98607
04/05/99
$114.33
Palay Display Industries
Displays
082824
PRO SHOP
GENERAL SUPPLI
8308
04/05/99
$484.05
Palay Display Industries
GENERAL SUPPLIES
083116
PRO SHOP
GENERAL SUPPLI
8308
< *>
$598.38*
.98608
04/05/99
$19.00
Paller, Margie
Class refund
030999
ART CNTR PROG
REGISTRATION F
< *>
$19.00*
.98609
04/05/99
$980.75
PARK NICOLLET CLINIC
Pre employment physic
030699
CENT SVC GENER
ADVERT PERSONL
04/05/99
$275.23
PARK NICOLLET CLINIC
Fitness for duty exam
030699
FIRE DEPT. GEN
PHYS EXAMS
< *>
$1,255.98*
.98610
04/05/99
$181.55
PC ServiceSource
Media set -up
5036850
MEDIA LAB
EQUIP REPLACEM
9299
< *>
$181.55*
98611
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
98612
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
98613
04/05/99
98615
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/9.9
04/05/99
$131.85
$58.80
$252.60
- $16.00
- $12.80
$138.60
$189.30
$742.35*
$1,750.00
$1,750.00
$1,750.00
$5,250.00*
$200.00
$200.00*
$2.50
$47.90
$54.03
$5.96
$6.20
$66.84
$3.24
$18.32
$6.00
$10.36
$3.54
$5.40
$13.60
$5.00
$0.55
$20.00
$13.00
$32.00
$15.00
$4.50
$3.10
PEPSI -COLA COMPANY
PEPSI -COLA COMPANY
PEPSI -COLA COMPANY
PEPSI -COLA COMPANY
PEPSI -COLA COMPANY
PEPSI -COLA COMPANY
PEPSI -COLA COMPANY
PERSONNEL DECISIONS
PERSONNEL DECISIONS
PERSONNEL DECISIONS
Peterson, Dorothy
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
I
fee for service
Fee for service
Fee for service
75276205 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
76062176 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX
76062191 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
76062194 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
75276317 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
75296314 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
76062320 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
J117473 INSPECTIONS PROF SERVICES
J117474 INSPECTIONS PROF SERVICES
J117475 INSPECTIONS PROF SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 031099
MEETING EXPENSE 031899
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 031899
MEETING EXPENSE 031899
POSTAGE i 031899
MILEAGE OR :ALLOWANCE 031899
MEETING EXPENSE 031899
MILEAGE OR! ALLOWANCE 031899
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 031899
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 031899
GENERAL SUPPLIES 031899
PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 031899
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 031899
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 031899
MEETING EXPENSE 031899
GENERAL SUPPLIES 031899
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 031899
GENERAL SUPPLIES 031899
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 031899
GENERAL SUPPLIES 031899
MILEAGE ORIALLOWANCE 031899
MILEAGE ORIALLOWANCE 031899
�I
SENIOR CITIZEN PROF SERVICES
CITY COUNCIL MEETING EXPENS,
ADMINISTRATION CONF & SCHOOLS
ADMINISTRATION MEETING EXPENS
ADMINISTRATION POSTAGE
FINANCE MILEAGE
ASSESSING MEETING EXPENS
ASSESSING MILEAGE
PUBLIC HEALTH CONF & SCHOOLS
PUBLIC HEALTH MILEAGE
PUBLIC HEALTH GENERAL SUPPLI
PUBLIC HEALTH PHOTO SUPPLIES
TOBACCO GRANT CONF & SCHOOLS
CONTINGENCIES PROF SERVICES
CONTINGENCIES MEETING EXPENS
PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI
PARK ADMIN. CONF & SCHOOLS
PARK ADMIN. GENERAL SUPPLI
ADAPTIVE RECRE PROF SERVICES
ADAPTIVE RECRE GENERAL SUPPLI
BUILDING MAINT MILEAGE
GENERAL(BILLIN MILEAGE
COUNCIL CH�EGISTER
31 -MAR -1999 ( 46) page 31
CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT------
VENDOR---------
DESCRIPTION - - -
- -- INVOICE
-------
PROGRAM--- - - - - -- OBJECT-- - - - -PO -NUM
- - - - --
--------------------------
198615 04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
$17.82
$10.00
$0.24
- - - - --
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
PETTY CASH
- - - - --
MEETING EXPENSE
MEETING EXPENSE
Over /under
031899
031899
031899
DISTRIBUTION MEETING EXPENS
TRAINING MEETING EXPENS
GENERAL FD PRO CASH OVER AND
< *>
$365.10*
198618
198619
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
04/05/99
198620 04/05/99
04/05/99
198621 04/05/99
04/05/99
198622 04/05/99
04/05/99
198623 04/05/99
- $33.75
-$5.51
-$6.99
-$5.51
- $33.65
-$6.41
-$5.62
-$5.82
-$5.99
-$5.99
$215.50.
$802.25
$1,019.50
$2,368.09
$175.47
$3,203.35
- $33.65
$148.95
$1,706.76
$69.00
$340.60
$3,040.99
$438.50
$1,636.70
$82.00
$257.50
$900.95
$1,212.45
$3,017.61
$468.95
$3,629.15
$140.00
$24,725.38*
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 3191338
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 3191484
COST OF.GOODS SOLD WI 3191493
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 3191495
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 3191496
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 3191497
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 3191672
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 3191673
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 3191674
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 3191675
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 477173
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 477174
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 477175
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 477176
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 477177
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 477178
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 3191745
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 479024
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 479025
RANGE BALLS 479026
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 479027
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 479028
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 479029
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 479030
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 481238
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 481239
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 481240
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 481241
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 481242
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 481243
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 481244
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 481344
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN RANGE BALLS
YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
$117.00 Phillips, Linda Art work sold 031899 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER
$117.00*
- $590.00 PHYSIO CONTROL Credit XV370495 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP
$808.11 PHYSIO CONTROL Ambulance supplies 399866 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 9951
$218.11*
$350.81 Ping COST OF GOODS - PRO S 3831960 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 8025
$212.49 Ping COST OF GOODS - PRO S 3835808 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 8025
$563.30*
$2,526.00 Pinkerton Systems Integr Replace master interr 0013467 EDINB /CL PROG OFFICE FURN & 9982
$49.50 Pinkerton Systems Integr Alarm repair 13489 ED BUILDING & CONTR REPAIRS 1905
$2,575.50*
$769.11 Pinnacle Distributing COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 998496 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
OUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
31 -MAR -1999 (18:46) page 32
HECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
198623
04/05/99
$372.15
Pinnacle Distributing
COST
OF GOODS
SOLD MI
998532
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
04/05/99
$421.77
Pinnacle Distributing
COST
OF GOODS
SOLD MI
998350
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MIX
04/05/99
$769.11
Pinnacle Distributing
COST
OF GOODS
SOLD MI
998621
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
04/05/99
$372.15
Pinnacle Distributing
COST
OF GOODS
SOLD MI
998652
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
04/05/99
$446.58
Pinnacle Distributing
COST
OF GOODS
SOLD MI
998674
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MIX
04/05/99
$694.68
Pinnacle Distributing
COST
OF GOODS
SOLD MI
998732
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
04/05/99
$187.60
Pinnacle Distributing
COST
OF GOODS
SOLD MI
998796
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
04/05/99
$133.45
Pinnacle Distributing
COST
OF GOODS
SOLD MI
998797
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
04/05/99
$372.15
Pinnacle Distributing
COST
OF GOODS
SOLD MI
998823
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
04/05/99
$506.15
Pinnacle Distributing
COST
OF GOODS
SOLD MI
998838
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MIX
< *>
$5,044.90*
198624
04/05/99
$125.25
PIP PRINTING
Hours cards
8963
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRINTING
1582
< *>
$125.25*
198625
04/05/99
$414.60
Pirtek Plymouth
Misc
swivels
PL3291
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1395
< *>
$414.60*
198626
04/05/99
$371.05
Pitz, Gladys
Ambulance refund
032299
GENERAL FD PRO
AMBULANCE FEES
< *>
$371.05*
198627
04/05/99
$1,678.93
Planet Soccer
Soccer goal
5391844
ATHLETIC ACTIV
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$1,678.93*
198628
04/05/99
$225.51
PLASTIC TO GO WAREHOUSE
Remodeling
022701
CITY HALL
EQUIP REPLACEM
1514
< *>
$225.51*
198629
04/05/99
$23.00
Pollack, Terri
Skating class
refund
031699
ARENA BLDG /GRO
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$23.00*
198630
04/05/99
$4,726.09
Polo Ralph Lauren Corpor
COST
OF GOODS
- PRO S
768782
PRO SHOP
COST OF GDS -PR
6337
< *>
$4,726.09*
198632
04/05/99
$2,388.37
Polo Ralph Lauren WW Gol
COST
OF GOODS
- PRO S
07305748
PRO SHOP
COST OF GDS -PR
6337
04/05/99
$143.03
Polo Ralph Lauren WW Gol
COST
OF GOODS
- PRO S
07305749
PRO SHOP
COST OF GDS -PR
6337
04/05/99
$26.10
Polo Ralph Lauren WW Gol
COST
OF GOODS
- PRO S
07305749
PRO SHOP
COST OF GDS -PR
6337
04/05/99
$88.14
Polo Ralph Lauren WW Gol
COST
OF GOODS
- PRO S
07305750
PRO SHOP
COST OF GDS -PR
6337
04/05/99
$216.53
Polo Ralph Lauren WW Gol
COST
OF GOODS
- PRO S
07305750
PRO SHOP
COST OF GDS -PR
6337
04/05/99
$35.41
Polo Ralph Lauren WW Gol
COST
OF GOODS
- PRO S
07305751
PRO SHOP
COST OF GDS -PR
6337
04/05/99
$1,977.98
Polo Ralph Lauren WW Gol
COST
OF GOODS
- PRO S
07305751
PRO SHOP
COST OF GDS -PR
6337
04/05/99
$145.72
Polo Ralph Lauren WW Gol
COST
OF GOODS
- PRO S
07305752
PRO SHOP
COST OF GDS -PR
6337
04/05/99
$38.41
Polo Ralph Lauren WW Gol
COST
OF GOODS
- PRO S
07305752
PRO SHOP
COST OF GDS -PR
6337
04/05/99
$68.78
Polo Ralph Lauren WW Gol
COST
OF GOODS
- PRO S
07305753
PRO SHOP
COST OF GDS -PR
6337
04/05/99
$119.18
Polo Ralph Lauren WW Gol
COST
OF GOODS
- PRO S
07305761
PRO SHOP
COST OF GDS -PR
6337
04/05/99
$941.10
Polo Ralph Lauren WW Gol
COST
OF GOODS
- PRO S
07305762
PRO SHOP
COST OF GDS -PR
6337
04/05/99
$248.79
Polo Ralph Lauren WW Gol
COST
OF GOODS
- PRO S
07305762
PRO SHOP
COST OF GDS -PR
6337
< *>
$6,437.54*
198633
04/05/99
$366.40
Pope, Alvin
Ambulance refund
032299
GENERAL FD PRO
AMBULANCE FEES
< *>
$366.40*
198634
04/05/99
$519.25
POSITIVE PROMOTIONS
PRINTING
00607042
POLICE DEPT. G
PRINTING
1054
< *>
$519.25*
198635
04/05/99
$780.00
POSTMASTER
Bulk
mailing
0329
CENT SVC GENER
POSTAGE
31 -MAR -1999 (146) page 33
COUNCIL
CHEGISTER
CHECK NO
DATE CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM--- - -
- - -- OBJECT-- - - - -PO -NUM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<*>
$780.00*
198636
04/05/99
$126.00
POSTMASTER
Bulk mailing
032999
CENT SVC GENER
POSTAGE
< *>
$126.00*
198637
04/05/99
$280.00
POSTMASTER
Newsletter postage
032499
CENT SVC GENER
POSTAGE
< *>
$280.00*
198638
04/05/99
$3,450.00
PRECISION DYNAMICS
Wrist bands
628787
ED ADMINISTRAT
GENERAL SUPPLI 1297
< *>
$3,450.00*
198639
04/05/99
$3,377.28
Precision Tree Company,
Tree trimming
030199
TREE TRIMMING
PROF SERVICES
04/05/99
$3,033.47
Precision Tree Company,
tree trimming
030399
TREE TRIMMING
PROF SERVICES
04/05/99
$1,244.00
Precision Tree Company,
Tree trimming
030499
TREE TRIMMING
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$7,654.75*
198640
04/05/99
$904.63
PREMIER FLEET SERVICES
Paint
13654
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES 1472
04/05/99
$326.50
PREMIER FLEET SERVICES
Paint
13666
EQUIPMENT OPER
CONTR REPAIRS 1475
< *>
$1,231.13*
198641
04/05/99
$79.17
Prestige Flag
Course supplies
25697
MAINT.OF COURS
GENERAL SUPPLI 1306
04/05/99
$176.46
Prestige Flag
Course flags
25699
MAINT OF COURS
GENERAL SUPPLI 1306
< *>
$255.63*
198642
04/05/99
$192.00
PRINTERS SERVICE INC
Blade sharpening
15285
ARENA ICE MAIN
EQUIP MAINT
< *>
$192.00*
198643
04/05/99
-$8.56
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI
104997
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
04/05/99
- $31.42
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI
105286
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
04/05/99
$1,114.54
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI
25179
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
04/05/99
$2,204.74
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI
25182
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
04/05/99
$2,759.72
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI
25190
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
04/05/99
$1,031.52
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI
27881
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
04/05/99
$1,046.69
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI
27885
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
04/05/99
$1,384.28
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI
27888
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
04/05/99
-$5.42
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI
106283
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
04/05/99
$2,132.87
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI
31092
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
04/05/99
$486.54
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI
31093
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
04/05/99
$1,134.96
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI
31094
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
< *>
$13,250.46*
198644
04/05/99
$98.00
PROGRESSIVE CONSULTING
E Prof eng sery
9801108
GENERAL(BILLIN
PROF SERVICES
04/05/99
$152.00
PROGRESSIVE CONSULTING
E Phosphate project
9802305
WATER TREATMEN
PROF SERVICES 9011
< *>
$250.00*
198645
04/05/99
$116.00
Protection One
Security system
022599
BUILDING MAINT
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$116.00*
198646
04/05/99
$221.65
QUALITY FLOW SYSTEMS
REPAIR PARTS
5543
GENERAL STORM
REPAIR PARTS 9004
< *>
$221.65*
198647
04/05/99
$179.40
QUALITY REFRIGERATION
IN Refrig repair
122574
GRILL
CONTR REPAIRS 9039
< *>
$179.40*
198648
04/05/99
$481.74
Quality Sports Inc
COST OF GOODS - PRO S
125019
PRO SHOP
COST OF GDS -PR 8022
=NCIL
CHECK REGISTER
31 -MAR -1999 (18:46) page 34
:HECK NO
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
<*>
$481.74*
198649
04/05/99
$119.00
Ragan Communications Inc
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
4703410B
ADMINISTRATION
DUES & SUBSCRI
< *>
$119.00*
198650
04/05/99
$100.00
RAINS, DIANE
Perform
042799
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$100.00*
198651
04/05/99
$135.00
Ranstrom, Jean
AC service
032999
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
04/05/99
$52.00
Ranstrom, Jean
CRAFT SUPPLIES
032999
ART CENTER ADM
CRAFT SUPPLIES
< *>
$187.00*
198652
04/05/99
$210.80
RAYMOND HAEG PLUMBING
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
010399
ART CENTER BLD
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$210.80*
198653
04/05/99
$7,481.22
Recreation Sports & Play
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
031199
EQUIPMENT REPL
EQUIP REPLACEM
9999
< *>
$7,481.22*
198654
04/05/99
$99.00
Recycool
Coolant recycling
3902252
EQUIPMENT OPER
GENERAL SUPPLI
1291
< *>
$99.00*
198655
04/05/99.
$117.13
Red Rooster Auto Stores
Truck steps
B486114
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
1184
< *>
$117.13*
198656
04/05/99
$147.90
RED WING SHOES
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
1085
EQUIPMENT OPER
SAFETY EQUIPME
04/05/99
$147.90
RED WING SHOES
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
1085
PUMP & LIFT ST
SAFETY EQUIPME
04/05/99
$137.70
RED WING SHOES
SAFETY'EQUIPMENT
1085
BUILDING MAINT
SAFETY EQUIPME
04/05/99
$115.60
RED WING SHOES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1085
CLUB HOUSE
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$549.10*
198657
04/05/99
$60.67
Rental Center & Power To
Hand tool repair
90825
BUILDING MAINT
CONTR REPAIRS
1200
< *>
$60.67*
198658
04/05/99
$1,289.39
Resort Two
COST OF GOODS - PRO S
3769
PRO SHOP
COST OF GDS -PR
9431
< *>
$1,289.39*
198659
04/05/99
$78.00
RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPA
Plumbing
13519
ADMINISTRATION
CONTR REPAIRS
1607
04/05/99
$78.00
RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPA
Repair
13828
GOLF DOME
REPAIR PARTS
1380
< *>
$156.00*
198660
04/05/99
$1,681.61
RICHFIELD TRANSMISSION C
Transmission
9758
EQUIPMENT OPER
CONTR REPAIRS
9169
< *>
$1,681.61*
198661
04/05/99
$26.00
RINE, DAVE
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
031899
POLICE DEPT. G
CONF & SCHOOLS
< *>
$26.00*
198662
04/05/99
$22.56
Ritz Camera
PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES
03750625
FIRE DEPT. GEN
PHOTO SUPPLIES
9762
< *>
$22.56*
198663
04/05/99
$40.00
ROBBINSDALE CITY BAND
Services Edinborough
042999
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$40.00*
198664
04/05/99
$479.25
ROBERT B. HILL
GENERAL SUPPLIES
53592
ARENA BLDG /GRO
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$479.25*
31 -MAR -1999 ( *) page 35
P g
COUNCIL
CH�EGISTER
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM--- - -
- - -- OBJECT-- - - - -PO -NUM
-------------------------------------Y--------------------------------------------------------------
198665
04/05/99
$550.00
Runyan, David T
Arch fees
031699
RESTROOM FACIL
CIP 1643
< *>
$550.00*
198666
04/05/99
$191.06
RUTGERS BAY LAKE LODGE
Spring conference
En 032399
ENGINEERING GE
CONF & SCHOOLS
< *>
$191.06*
198667
04/05/99
$1,470.36
SA -AG INC
Gravel
97537
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPLI 2848
< *>
$1,470.36*
198668
04/05/99
$90.00
Sauro, Marie
AC service
032999
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$90.00*
198669
04/05/99
$235.32
SCAN AIR FILTER
Filters
22934
CITY HALL GENE
REPAIR PARTS 1427
< *>
$235.32*
198670
04/05/99
$100.00
SCHENCK, DAVID
LAUNDRY
032999
POOL TRACK GRE
LAUNDRY
< *>
$100.00*
198671
04/05/99
$498.00
Schwan's Food Service
Oven /warmer
LC7243PC
GRILL
GENERAL SUPPLI 1381
< *>
$498.00*
198672
04/05/99
$50.76
SEARS
Floor.jack
SR756999
POOL TRACK GRE
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$50.76*
198673
04/05/99
$286.20
SEELYE PLASTICS
Chemical piping
520418
WATER TREATMEN
GENERAL SUPPLI 1094
04/05/99
$374.19
SEELYE PLASTICS
Piping supplies
521781
WATER TREATMEN
GENERAL SUPPLI 1414
< *>
$660.39*
198674
04/05/99
$150.00
SEIDEL, ROXANNE
Public relations
CL /E MARCH /AP
ED ADMINISTRAT
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$150.00*
198675
04/05/99
$83.20
Seifert, Elizabeth
Art work sold
031899
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
< *>
$83.20*
198676
04/05/99
$59.64
SELECT INN
Motel room
2800
SNOW & ICE REM
GENERAL SUPPLI 1564
< *>
$59.64*
198677
04/05/99
$689.00
SHAUGHNESY, SANDRA D
AC service
032999
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$689.00*
198678
04/05/99
$290.75
Sheshunoff Information S
Book
9105148
ADMINISTRATION
CONF & SCHOOLS
< *>
$290.75*
198679
04/05/99
$32.06
SICO NORTH AMERICA INC.
Allen wrenches
1302426
POOL TRACK GRE
GENERAL SUPPLI 9971
< *>
$32.06*
198680
04/05/99
$45.00
Silvers, Roxanne
AC service
032.999
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$45.00*
198681
04/05/99
$796.32
SIMONE ENGINEERING INC
REPAIR PARTS
F312320
PUMP & LIFT ST
REPAIR PARTS 9001
04/05/99
$1,638.65
SIMONE ENGINEERING INC
Flow meters
31231
PUMP & LIFT ST
REPAIR PARTS 9002
< *>
$2,434.97*
198682
04/05/99
$162.20
SIMPLEX TIME RECORDER CO Simplex repair
11634161
CLUB HOUSE
REPAIR PARTS 1378
04/05/99
$102.75
SIMPLEX TIME RECORDER CO SAFETY EQUIPMENT
11641660
CLUB HOUSE
SAFETY EQUIPME 1827
'OUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
31 -MAR -1999 (18:46) page 36
'HECK NO
---------------------------------------------------------.--------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
< *>
$264.95*
198683
04/05/99
$60.75
SIMS SECURITY
Guard
9257597
POOL TRACK GRE
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$60.75*
198684
04/05/99
$420.51
Sir Speedy Print
Door tags
42125
ASSESSING
PRINTING
1036
< *>
$420.51*
198685
04/05/99
$389.64
Skottegaard, Ruth C
Ambulance refund
032299
GENERAL FD PRO
AMBULANCE FEES
< *>
$389.64*
198686
04/05/99
$2,509.45
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I
COST OF GOODS SOLD
BE-93387
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
04/05/99
$141.75
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MI
93388
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
04/05/99
$508.32
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I
COST 00 GOODS SOLD
BE
93391
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
04/05/99
$24.40
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MI
93392
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MIX
04/05/99
$3,408.29
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I
COST OF GOODS SOLD
BE
93586
YORK SELLING '-
CST OF GDS BEE
04/05/99
$61.00
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MI
93587
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
04/05/99
$74.15
- SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I
COST OF GOODS SOLD
BE
93588
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE.
04/05/99
$1,295.15
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I
COST OF GOODS SOLD
BE
93599
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
04/05/99
$12.20
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MI
93600
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MIX
04/05/99
$216.50
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I
COST OF GOODS SOLD
BE
403869
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
04/05/99
$1,992.95
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I
COST'OF GOODS SOLD
BE
93813
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
< *>
$10,244.16*
198687
04/05/99
$3,101.17
SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CABLE
Cable commission
030599
COMMUNICATIONS
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$3,101.17*
198688
04/05/99
$50.92
SPECKMAN, GAIL
Art work gold
031899
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
< *>
$50.92*
198689
*>
04/05/99
$240.00
Spooner, Anne
AC service
032999,
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
<
$240.0.0*
198690
04/05/99
$2,115.00
SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED
Cont disclosure
159
GENERAL FD PRO
DUE FROM HRA
< *>
$2,115.00*
198691
04/05/99
04/05/99
$170.87
$86.99
SPS
SPS
Valve
3158079
WATER TREATMEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
1012
04/05/99
$94.01
SPS
Tools
3167392
PUMP & LIFT ST
TOOLS
1199
< *>
$351.87*
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
3171709
ARENA BLDG /GRO
CONTR REPAIRS
1503
198692
04/05/99
04/05/99
$2,015.51
SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC
Prof sery
31177
PLANNING
PROF SERVICES
04/05/99
$4,930.04
SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC
Prof eng sery
3254 -4
CONTINGENCIES
PROF SERVICES
$5,446.23
SRF CONSULTING GROUP.INC
Prof eng sery
32584
TRAFFIC SIGNAL
CIP
< *>
$12,391.78*
198693
04/05/99
$100.00
St Paul Czechoslovak Fol
Perform
041199
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$100.00*
198694
04/05/99
$155.38
ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO
Glass
5175934
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
1718
< *>
$155.38*
198695
04/05/99
$110.01
STANS DOOR SERVICE
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
031499
VERNON OCCUPAN
CONTR REPAIRS
04/05/99
$82.51
STANS DOOR SERVICE
Door repair
1365
VERNON OCCUPAN
CONTR REPAIRS
< *>
$192.52*
• • 1
'
COUNCIL CH#EGI STER 31 - MAR -1999 C 6) page e 37
CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM--- - - - - -- OBJECT-- - - - -PO NUM
------------------ -----------------------
------------------------------P--------------------------
198696 04/05/99 $32.79 STEPP MFG CO INC Tar kettle arts 16204 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 11
04/05/99 $27.90 STEPP MFG CO INC Tar kettle parts 16206 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1150
< *> $60.69*
198697 04/05/99 .$69.02 Sterling Cut Glass COST OF GOODS - PRO S 0085206 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 9423
< *> $69.02*
198698 04/05/99 $211.72 STEWART LUMBER 2x4's wood 816838 FIRE DEPT. GEN REPAIR PARTS 1429
< *> $211.72*
198699 04/05/99 $35.00 Stouten, Jaqueline Program 042999 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER
< *> $35.00*
198700 04/05/99 $695.68 Straight Down Clothing C COST OF GOODS - PRO S 1513544 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6330
< *> $695.68*
198701 04/05/99 $46.54 STREICHERS AMMUNITION 1033001 POLICE DEPT. G AMMUNITION 1322
04/05/99 $1,041.57 STREICHERS AMMUNITION 1017101 POLICE DEPT. G AMMUNITION 9415
04/05/99 $21.19 STREICHERS Charge 1028032 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1149
04/05/99 $31.90 STREICHERS GENERAL SUPPLIES 1043331 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI 1331
04/05/99 $116.80 STREICHERS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 1043781 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP MAINT 1334
< *> $1,258.00*
198702 04/05/99 $100.00 Strohmyer, Tom Services Ediborough 040899 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER
< *> $100.00*
198703 04/05/99 $1,077.05 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET Body repair 339716 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 9469
04/05/99 $165.00 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET Park dept tailgate CVCB3403 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 9791
04/05/99 - $205.56 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET Credit 57796 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS
04/05/99 $100.34 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET Repair CVCB3417 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS
04/05/99 $454.71 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET Shop parts 60574 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1489
04/05/99 - $391.03 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET Credit 60925 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 1692
< *> $1,200.51*
198704 04/05/99 $208.04 SUBURBAN PROPANE OFFICE SUPPLIES 031799 ARENA ICE MAIN OFFICE SUPPLIE
< *> $208.04*
198705 04/05/99 $2,000.00 SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY Dues 040599 SUB.RATE AUTH. PROF SERVICES
< *> $2,000.00*
198706 04/05/99 - $91.00 SUN MOUNTAIN SPORTS INC. COST OF GOODS - PRO S 828809 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6335
04/05/99 $837.82 SUN MOUNTAIN SPORTS INC. COST OF GOODS - PRO S 517027 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6335
04/05/99 $239.09 SUN MOUNTAIN SPORTS INC. COST OF GOODS - PRO S 517886 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6335
< *> $985.91*
198707 04/05/99 $36.40 Sun Newspapers ADVERTISING LEGAL 195177 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LE
04/05/99 $70.20 Sun Newspapers ADVERTISING LEGAL 195178 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LE
04/05/99 $31.20 Sun Newspapers ADVERTISING LEGAL 199098 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LE
04/05/99 $37.70 Sun Newspapers ADVERTISING LEGAL 199099 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LE
04/05/99 $83.85 Sun Newspapers ADVERTISING LEGAL 199776 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LE
04/05/99 $50.70 Sun Newspapers ADVERTISING LEGAL 200304 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LE
04/05/99 $40.30 Sun Newspapers ADVERTISING LEGAL 200307 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LE
04/05/99 $58.50 Sun Newspapers ADVERTISING LEGAL 200308 ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LE
04/05/99 $1,136.20 Sun Newspapers ADVERTISING LEGAL 200310. ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING LE
< *> $1,545.05*
OUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
31 -MAR -1999 (18:46) page 38
HECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT PO NUM
-----------------------------------------------------------------=-----------------------------------------------------------------
198708
04/05/99
$421.00
SUNDIN, ROSALIE
AC service
032999
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
04/05/99
$31.94
SUNDIN, ROSALIE
CRAFT SUPPLIES
032999
ART. CENTER ADM
CRAFT SUPPLIES
04/05/99
$380.00
SUNDIN, ROSALIE
AC service
032999
MEDIA LAB
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$832.94*
198709
04/05/99
$51.94
Super America
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
031299
POLICE DEPT. G
MILEAGE
< *>
$51.94*
198710
04/05/99
$177.91
SuperAmerica
Gas
031699
GENERAL MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI 1676
< *>
$177.91*
198711
04/05/99
$289.14
Susan Frame Design
COST OF GOODS SOLD
030999
ART SUPPLY GIF
COST OF GD SOL 1238
< *>
$289.14*
i
198712
04/05/99
$100.22
SUTPHEN CORPORATION
Senders
29100739
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS 1394
< *>
$100.22*
198713
04/05/99
$294.53
T.C. MOULDING & SUPPLY
COST OF GOODS SOLD
250611DI
ART SUPPLY GIF
COST OF GD SOL 8877
< *>
$294.53*
198714
04/05/99
$49.40
Tapper, Elizabeth N.
Art work sold
031899
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
< *>
$49.40*
198715
04/05/99
$1,100.00
Taylor Technologies
Inc
i
Autocad training
12536
ENGINEERING GE
CONF & SCHOOLS 9656
< *>
$1,100.00*
198716
04/05/99
$30.00
TCALMC
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
031299
TRAINING
CONF & SCHOOLS
< *>
$30.00*
198717
04/05/99
$126..50
TEAM MARKETING COMPANY I
Film
62571
ED ADMINISTRAT
GENERAL SUPPLI 1586
< *>
$126.50*
198718
04/05/99
$70.48
TELEVISION EQUIPMENT
ASS
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
990360
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP MAINT
< *>
$70.48*
198719
04/05/99
$404.00
THOMPSON, MARK
AC service
032999
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$404.00*
198720
04/05/99
$13,402.25
THOMSEN- NYBECK
Prosecuting
130459
LEGAL SERVICES
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$13,402.25*
198721
04/05/99
$1,941.50
THORPE DISTRIBUTING
COMP
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
156150
VERNON SELLING
CST OF.GDS BEE
04/05/99
$24.20
THORPE DISTRIBUTING
COMP
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
156151
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
04/05/99
$1,445.31
THORPE DISTRIBUTING
COMP
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
156671
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
04/05/99
$72.90
THORPE DISTRIBUTING
COMP
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
157033
GOLF DOME
CST OF GDS BEE 9043
04/05/99
$38.00
THORPE DISTRIBUTING
COMP
COST OF GOODS SOLD
157033
GRILL
COST OF GD SOL
04/05/99
$180.00
THORPE DISTRIBUTING
COMP
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
157135
GRILL
CST OF GDS BEE 9043
04/05/99
$6,521.30
THORPE DISTRIBUTING
COMP
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
157201
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
04/05/99
$24.20
THORPE DISTRIBUTING
COMP
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
157202
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
< *>
$10,247.41*
198722
04/05/99
$3,267.42
TITLEIST
COST OF GOODS - PRO S
20153333
PRO SHOP
COST OF GDS -PR 6333
< *>
$3,267.42*
198723
04/05/99
$545.52
TKDA Engineers Architect
Prof eng sery
042918
UG STORAGE TAN
CIP
�
- a 39
31-MAR-1999 � )
COUNCIL
CH EGISTER
.46
page
CHECK NO
DATE CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<*>
$545.52*
198724
04/05/99
$69.16
TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPL
Cylinder rental
595906
EQUIPMENT OPER
GENERAL SUPPLI
1281
04/05/99
$133.06
TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPL
Argon gas
235240
EQUIPMENT OPER
WELDING SUPPLI
1456
< *>
$202.22*
198725
04/05/99
$39.00
Tomlinson, Dawn
Art work sold
031899
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
< *>
$39.00*
198726
04/05/99'
$865.92
Tommy Hilfiger Golf
GENERAL SUPPLIES
298559
PRO SHOP
GENERAL SUPPLI
9449
04/05/99
$898.16
Tommy Hilfiger Golf
COST OF GOODS - PRO S
304359
PRO SHOP
COST OF GDS -PR
9449
< *>
$1,764.08*
198727
04/05/99
$132.75
TREADWAY GRAPHICS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
95517
DARE
GENERAL SUPPLI
1323
< *>
$132.75*
198728
04/05/99
$25.35
Treuting, Kristen
Art work sold
031899
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
< *>
$25.35*
198729
04/05/99
$6,540.75
TRUCK UTILITIES MFG CO
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
0051671
EQUIPMENT REPL
EQUIP REPLACEM
1033
< *>
$6,540.75*
198730
04/05/99
$50.00
Twin Cities Golf Organiz
Dues
99101
GOLF ADMINISTR
DUES & SUBSCRI
1645
< *>
$50.00*
198731
04/05/99
$118.75
Twin Cities Service Cent
Radio repair
I23228
EQUIPMENT OPER
RADIO SERVICE
1396
04/05/99
$47.50
Twin Cities Service Cent
Radio repair
I23230
EQUIPMENT OPER
RADIO SERVICE
1396
< *>
$166.25*
198732
04/05/99
$4,400.00
TWIN CITIES WRECKER SALE
Wheel lift
166870
EQUIPMENT OPER
EQUIP REPLACEM
9492
< *>
$4,400.00*
198733
04/05/99
$989.56
TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO
Garage door repair
072511
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
1278
04/05/99
$914.00
TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO
Garage door repair
072512
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
1179
04/05/99
$890.00
TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO
Garage door repair
072513
PW BUILDING
GENERAL SUPPLI
1182
04/05/99
$269.79
TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO
Garage door repair
072514
PW BUILDING
GENERAL SUPPLI
1283
< *>
$3,063.35*
198734
04/05/99
$24.16
TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO
Station 2 oxygen
471117
FIRE DEPT. GEN
FIRST AID SUPP
9765
04/05/99
$10.50
TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO
Oxygen
472316
FIRE DEPT. GEN
FIRST AID SUPP
9765
< *>
$34.66*
198735
04/05/99
$591.13
U.S. CAVALRY
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
3588142
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP RENTAL
1328
04/05/99
$14.88
U.S. CAVALRY
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
3588283
POLICE DEPT. G
UNIF ALLOW
1328
< *>
$606.01*
198736
04/05/99
$45.26
ULLRICH, CINDY
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
032999
ED ADMINISTRAT
MILEAGE
< *>
$45.26*
198737
04/05/99
$58.95
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
462710
FIRE DEPT. GEN
UNIF ALLOW
9949
< *>
$58.95*
198738
04/05/99
$8,148.77
UNISOURCE
Paper
121136
COMMUNICATIONS
ADVERT OTHER
< *>
$8,148.77*
=NCIL
CHECK REGISTER
31 -MAR -1999 (18:46) page 40
:HECK NO
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
198739
04/05/99
$63.04
United Electric
Electrical supplies
4866300
WATER TREATMEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
1091
04/05/99
$46.79
United Electric
Electrical supplies
43687900
ST LIGHTING OR
GENERAL SUPPLI
1407
< *>
$109.83*
198740
04/05/99
$15.60
UNITED STORES
Gloves
4065.8
PW BUILDING
GENERAL SUPPLI
1425
< *>
$15.60*
198741
04/05/99
$60.00
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
Tree school
9408
TREES & MAINTE
CONF & SCHOOLS
1275
< *>
$60.00*
198742
04/05/99
$400.00
US bank
Fiscal agent
90414
ARENA ADMINIST
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$400.00*
i
198743
04/05/99
$1,498.93
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
040599
CENT SVC GENER
TELEPHONE
04/05/99
$136.56
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
040599
SKATING & HOCK
TELEPHONE
04/05/99
$343.03
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
040599
BUILDING MAINT
TELEPHONE
< *>
$1,978.52*
198744
04/05/99
$361.05
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
TELEPHONE
0405
CENT SVC GENER
TELEPHONE
< *>
$361.05*
1
198745
04/05/99
$12.60
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CNA90015
POLICE DEPT. G
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$12.60*
198746
04/05/99
$27.73
US West Dex
ADVERTISING OTHER
00498553
ART CENTER ADM
ADVERT OTHER
04/05/99
04/05/99
$25.50
US West Dex
TELEPHONE
00507936
FRED RICHARDS
TELEPHONE
$84.30
US West Dex
ADVERTISING OTHER
00507942
GOLF DOME
ADVERT OTHER
04/05/99
$35.40
US West Dex
ADVERTISING OTHER
00508198
ART CENTER ADM
ADVERT OTHER
04/05/99
$229.74
US West Dex
TELEPHONE
00510811
ED ADMINISTRAT
TELEPHONE
04/05/99
$55.50
US West Dex
TELEPHONE
00512207
FRED RICHARDS
TELEPHONE
04/05/99
$293.00
US West Dex
TELEPHONE
00512207
CLUB HOUSE
TELEPHONE
< *>
$751.17*
198747
04/05/99
$4,000.00
USPS
Postage ACCT # 75983
APRIL 19
CENT SVC GENER
POSTAGE
< *>
$4,000.00*
198748
04/05/99
$14.25
Vallen Safety Supply Com
Hard hat
2123678
GENERAL MAINT
SAFETY EQUIPME
1276
< *>
$14.25*
198749
04/05/99
$304.07
Valley Casting Inc
Volunteer recog
104640
CONTINGENCIES
GENERAL SUPPLI
1453
< *>
$304.07*
198750
04/05/99
$654.60
VAN PAPER CO.
Bags
256379
YORK SELLING
PAPER SUPPLIES
9806
04/05/99
$242.29
VAN PAPER CO.
Bags
256380
VERNON SELLING
PAPER SUPPLIES
9807
04/05/99
- $310.98
VAN PAPER CO.
Bag credit
256382
VERNON SELLING
PAPER SUPPLIES
9807
< *>
$585.91*
198751
04/05/99
$164.38
VANTAGE ELECTRIC
Garage door repair
15394
MAINT OF COURS
CONTR REPAIRS
8519
< *>
$164.38*
198752
04/05/99
$45.00
VELDE, DAVID
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
032299
PUBLIC HEALTH
CONF & SCHOOLS
04/05/99
$117.00
VELDE, DAVID
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
032299
PUBLIC HEALTH
CONF & SCHOOLS
< *>
$162.00*
198753
04/05/99
$613.91
Vermeer of Minnesota
Repair on chipper
507985
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1010
31 -MAR -1999 ( 46) page a e 41
COUNCIL
CH#E GISTER
CHECK NO
DATE CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
- - - - -- --------- -
DESCRIPTION
- - - -- ;--------------------------------
INVOICE
PROGRAM
--- - -
OBJECT
- - -- --------------
PO NUM
----
- -- -----------------------------------
<*>
$613.91*
198754
04/05/99
$1,938.30
VESSCO
Chlorinated regulator
18315
WATER TREATMEN REPAIR PARTS
9007
04/05/99
$713.55
VESSCO
Cylinders scale
18367
WATER TREATMEN
REPAIR PARTS
1415
$2,651.85*
198755
04/05/99
$241.77
Viking Woodcrafts Inc
CRAFT�SUPPLIES
0138238
ART CENTER ADM
CRAFT SUPPLIES
1064
< *>
$241.77*
198756
04/05/99
$80.00
VINTAGE ONE WINES
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
3081
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
< *>
$80.00*
198757
04/05/99
$86.33
WALSER FORD
I
Shop parts
72347
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1448
04/05/99
$60.66
WALSER FORD
Moulding
72426
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1480
04/05/99
$133.56
WALSER FORD
Brakeishoes
72618
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1728
< *>
$280.55*
198758
04/05/99
$621.75
WARNING LITES OF MINNESO
Neon hate
30643
GENERAL MAINT
SAFETY EQUIPME
9497
< *>
$621.75*
198759
04/05/99
$280.00
Weinblatt, Mic
AC service
032999
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$280.00*
198760
04/05/99
$693.87
Welsh Companies Inc
Rent
040199
YORK OCCUPANCY
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$693.87*
198761
04/05/99
$612.00
WENZEL, KENNETH
AC service
032999
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$612.00*
198762
04/05/99
$402.08
WEST WELD SUPPLY CO.
Welding supplies
21631
EQUIPMENT OPER
WELDING SUPPLI
1247
04/05/99
$999.98
WEST WELD SUPPLY CO.
Welding spool
21632
EQUIPMENT OPER
WELDING SUPPLI
1160
04/05/99
$209.96
WEST WELD SUPPLY CO.
Drill bits
21808
ED BUILDING &
GENERAL SUPPLI
1397
04/05/99
$174.36
WEST WELD SUPPLY CO.
Stock!
21935
EQUIPMENT OPER
WELDING SUPPLI
.1401
< *>
$1,786.38*
198163
04/05/99
$926.55
WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT
Printer
0067408
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
04/05/99
$100.81
WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT
Gasboy training
67484
EQUIPMENT OPER
GENERAL SUPPLI
1426
04/05/99
- $242.98
WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT
Credit
67589
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
1446
04/05/99
$352.00
WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT
Unstal fuel hose
67598
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
1447
< *>
$1,136.38*
198764
04/05/99
$28.74
Westwood Sports
Skaterepairs
122157
POOL TRACK GRE
CONTR REPAIRS
9973
< *>
$28.74*
198765
04/05/99
$62.00
Wilmot, Solvei
Cont ed
030999
PUBLIC HEALTH
CONF & SCHOOLS
04/05/99
$47.91
Wilmot, Solvei
Name badges for confe
031199
PUBLIC HEALTH
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$109.91*
198766
04/05/99
$529.70
WINE COMPANY, THE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
018364
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
04/05/99
$582.65
WINE COMPANY, THE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
018365
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
04/05/99
$2,843.25
WINE COMPANY, THE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
18366
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
04/05/99
$34.95
WINE COMPANY, THE
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
018661
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
04/05/99
$194.70
WINE COMPANY, THE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
018662
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
04/05/99
$101.90
WINE COMPANY, THE
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
018663
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
04/05/99
$1,342.98
WINE COMPANY, THE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
018664
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
:OUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
31 -MAR -1999 (18:46) page 42
:HECK NO
--------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT -----
- - - - --
- - - - -- VENDOR---------
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT------PO-
NUM
198766
04/05/99
$198.70
WINE COMPANY, THE
- - - - --
COST OFI
GOODS
- - - - --
SOLD WI
--------------------
018665
- -
YORK SELLING
- - -- - - --
CST OF GD WINE
- - --
04/05/99
$669.60
WINE COMPANY, THE
COST OF
GOODS
SOLD WI
018981
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
04/05/99
$289.40
WINE COMPANY, THE
COST 0
GOODS
SOLD WI
018982
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
04/05/99
$84.95
WINE COMPANY, THE
COST 0�
GOODS
SOLD WI
018983
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
< *>
$6,872.78*
198767
04/05/99
$1,379.20
WINE MERCHANTS
COST OFD
GOODS
SOLD WI
16373
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
04/05/99
$417.75
WINE MERCHANTS
COST OF
GOODS
SOLD WI
16374
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
04/05/99
$173.05
WINE MERCHANTS
COST OF
GOODS
SOLD WI
16376
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
04/05/99
$83.55
WINE MERCHANTS
COST Oil
GOODS
SOLD WI
7921
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
04/05/99
$435.30
WINE MERCHANTS
COST OFF
GOODS
SOLD WI
16773
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
04/05/99
$1,265.40
WINE MERCHANTS
COST OF
GOODS
SOLD WI
16776
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
< *>
$3,754.25*
198768
04/05/99
$165.00
WINEBERG, DON
MEETING
EXPENSE
031899
PRO SHOP
MEETING EXPENS
< *>
$165.00*
198769
04/05/99
$85.00
Wirtgen America
Freighti
I
charges
35898
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1280
< *>
$85.00*
198770
04/05/99
$165.02
WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY
Displays
W9887
PRO SHOP
GENERAL SUPPLI
9424
04/05/99
$112.21
WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY
GENERAL:
SUPPLIES
W10613
PRO SHOP
GENERAL SUPPLI
9424
< *>
$277.23*
198771
04/05/99
$130.00
Wolfe, Kay
AC service
032999
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$130.00*
i
I
198772
04/05/99
$656.90
WORLD CLASS WINES
INC
COST OF GOODS
SOLD WI
80065
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
04/05/99
$317.00
WORLD CLASS WINES
INC
COST OF GOODS
SOLD WI
80066
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
04/05/99
$1,335.62
WORLD CLASS WINES
INC
COST OF; GOODS
SOLD WI
80067
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
04/05/99
$123.80
WORLD CLASS WINES
INC
COST OF GOODS
SOLD WI
80271
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
04/05/99
$388.00
WORLD CLASS WINES
INC
COST OF GOODS
SOLD WI
80273
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
04/05/99
$824.72
WORLD CLASS WINES
INC
COST OF. GOODS
SOLD WI
80275
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
04/05/99
$91.00
WORLD CLASS WINES
INC
COST OF, GOODS
SOLD WI
80449
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
04/05/99
$242.50
WORLD CLASS WINES
INC
COST OF! GOODS
SOLD WI
80451
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
04/05/99
$381.88
WORLD CLASS WINES
INC
COST OF GOODS
SOLD WI
88450
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
< *>
$4,361.42*
198773
04/05/99
$45.00
Wunsch, Lucas
Undercover
032399
GENERAL FD PRO
CIGARETTE LICE
< *>
$45.00*
198774
04/05/99
$376.72
Xerox Coproration
I
SERVICE' CONTRACTS EQU
06735693
POLICE DEPT. G
SVC CONTR EQUI
04/05/99
$745.00
Xerox Coproration
Monthly'ixerox
fee
06740780
CENT SVC GENER
EQUIP RENTAL
3413
< *>
$1,121.72*
i
198775
04/05/99
$3,077.58
ZIEGLER INC
Rental equipment
E2418202
PUMP & LIFT ST
EQUIP RENTAL
9005
04/05/99
$1,608.15
ZIEGLER INC
Hydro hammer rental
G4637005
DISTRIBUTION
EQUIP RENTAL
7664
04/05/99
$44.86
ZIEGLER INC
Backhoe'parts
PC000197
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1156
04/05/99
$788.30
ZIEGLER INC
Shop parts
PC000198
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1175
04/05/99
$44.23
ZIEGLER INC
Switch I
PC000201
CENTENNIAL LAK
REPAIR PARTS
1610
< *>
$5,563.12*
198776
04/05/99
$37.50
ZWERNIK, DON
AC service
032999
MEDIA LAB
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$37.50*
•
COUNCIL CHE. _�GISTER 31 -MAR -1999 (1 .6) page 43
:CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$1,406,816.58*
COUNCIL CHE.. SUMMARY 31 -MAR -1999 k --:49) page 1
FUND
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# 10
GENERAL FUND
$578,988.21
FUND
# 11
COMMUNITY DEVELP. BLOCK GR
$1,000.00
FUND
# 12
COMMUNICATIONS
$13,400.90
FUND
# 15
WORKING CAPITAL
$9,855.56
FUND
# 23
ART CENTER
$12,876.31
FUND
# 25
GOLF DOME FUND
$1,496.15
FUND
# 26
SWIMMING POOL FUND
$111.32
FUND
# 27
GOLF COURSE FUND
$52,757.46
FUND
# 28
ICE ARENA FUND
$3,214.73
FUND
# 30
EDINBOROUGH /CENTENNIAL LAK
$20,002.92
FUND
# 40
UTILITY FUND
$348,735.95
FUND
# 41
STORM SEWER UTILITY FUND
$3,736.30
FUND
# 50
LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND
$271,531.51
FUND
# 60
CONSTRUCTION FUND
$6,081.17
FUND
# 61
PARK BOND FUND
$83,028.09
$1,406,816.58*
MINUTES
EDINA RECYCLING AND SOLID WASTE COMMISSION
JANUARY 21, 1999
7:00 A.M.
MANAGER'S CONFERENCE ROOM
MEMBERS PRESENT: Inna Hays, Judith Smith, Anne Cronin, Kathy Frey
MEMBER ABSENT: Bob Reid
GUESTS: K.C. Glaser, Edina High School: Shelly Lipetzky, Valley View
Middle School; and Paul Rosland, BFI
STAFF PRESENT: Solvei Wilmot
I. ROLL CALL
Meeting was called to order by Inna Hays, Chair, at 7:05 a.m.
II. MINUTES
Judy Smith MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE NOVEMBER 19, 1998
MEETING. Anne Cronin SECONDED. MOTION CARRIED.
III. VOLUNTEER RECOGNITION
Edina Volunteer Recognition event is scheduled for April 20, 1999. Ms. Hays asked for
suggestions for award recipients. Ms. Cronin suggested Lauren Inouye a student that was
very active last year and Rachel Hoffman- Daschlet a teacher at Valley View that organized
the students to do art work to a mailer.
IV. EDINA SCHOOL REPORT
Ms.Wilmot reported that Jay Willemson from the school district had not responded to her
inquires regarding the schools interest in a recycling program. The committee suggested
contacting Julie Cardinal to further research the possibility.
Ms. Frey commented that she has heard that Concord does not have any recycling in the
school. Mr. Glaser stated that the High School does not have any recycling bins for cans. He
will check on recycling bins for plastic bottles. He commented that there are containers for
mixed paper. Ms. Lipetzky stated that the Advisory Students collected mix paper for
recycling and there is bin for recycling cans in the cafeteria at Valley View Middle School.
V. ABOUT TOWN ARTICLE
Ms. Wilmot distributed information that may be published in the "About Town" magazine.
The information was about spring clean-up and items that are recyclable. It also stated what
residents can do with hazardous materials.
VI. RECYCLING TOTALS
Ms. Wilmot reported that for 1998 67% of the residents set recycling out weekly. Compared
to the same time last year, Edina is down 1%. The total tons collected in 1998 was 4,882.8
compared to 1997 which had 4,922.4. So a slight decrease has occurred from last year.
VII. OTHER BUSINESS
Tours will be discussed at the next meeting.
Paul Rosland stated that BFI will have an ad in the About Town regarding recycling. He also
suggested that BFI could do a canned goods collection with the recycling collection. The
commission could decide where the food donation should be given.
Mr. Rosland stated that BFI now has co- mingled trucks because they had to stay competive.
Ms. Frey expressed concern regarding moving to co- mingled collection. If the city were to
co- mingle would they be able to have competitive bids in the future. Mr. Rosland stated that
the companies are co- mingling and the industry is changing so that having source separated
collection is harder to find.
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
Meeting adjourned 8:10 p.m.
EDINA HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 1999
7:00 PM - COUNCIL ROOM
Members Present:
Nancy Atchison
Jim Campbell
Carol Carmichiel
Betsy Flaten
Sharon Ming
Tom Oye
Eileen Supple
Lynne Westphal
Ardis Wexler
Jim Zappa
Members Absent:
Guests Present:
Beth Fagin
Lea Favor
Staff Present:
Susan Heiberg
Report from Storefront /Youth Action (SFYA). Beth Fagin, SFYA's Clinical Director, and
Lea Favor, SFYA's Director of Diversity Services, were introduced and welcomed. Beth
reported that in the schools it is unfortunate that cultural issues get put on the "back burner."
At the two middle schools, there are three students who are in diversity support groups.
Diversity issues are addressed within the schools through curriculum, and at the elementary
level there is a high degree of comfort with the curriculum model. Otherwise, interest in
diversity programming has not been there in the schools as a whole. Beth shared that the
Black History Month assembly coordinated by Sheila Kosek was a success. Lea reported that
the Diversity Program provides services to schools who may need some support or assistance
with diversity education. Their method is to facilitate support groups in schools for students
who may be struggling with identity issues, self - esteem, race relations or other topics
pertaining to diversity. Their goal is to assist students and staff to make the school
environment a safe, welcoming and affirming place so that all students can learn and reach
their full potential. Classroom presentations are facilitated, and training is offered to student
groups. The Commission encouraged Lea and Beth to go before the Principal's Leadership
Cabinet to talk about bringing the Diversity Program into the schools. Betsy Flaten and
Lynne Westphal will help to coordinate a meeting with SFYA, the Superintendent and the
Principal.
Minutes Approved. Jim Zappa's motion to approve the minutes of January 26, 1999, was
seconded by Carol Carmichiel; the motion carried.
Chair's Report. This meeting was the last for Ardis Wexler in her role as Chair; the
Commission thanked her for the excellent job she has done. Jim Campbell was introduced
and welcomed as a new Commissioner.
Nominating Committee. Jim Zappa, Carol Carmichiel and Eileen Supple reported that they
had no slate of officers to present, due to difficulty in peoples' schedules. Ardis agreed to
continue in her present role until a replacement is made; therefore, it is expected that a slate
will be presented at the next meeting, with commissioners assuming roles of co- chairs.
Strategic Planning. The Commission determined the necessity of a strategic planning session
and agreed that it could be held in conjunction with the March meeting, beginning at 6:00 PM
with a light dinner. The Commissioners were asked to come prepared to discuss their vision
for the Commission. Materials will be sent out to accommodate this session.
CDBG Funding. The Planning Department published the following Community
Development Block Grant Program budget and requested that the Human Relations
Commission respond to the human services portion of the budget before it goes before the
City Council for final approval:
Rehabilitation of Private Property $80,000
Acquisition for Scattered Site Affordable Housing $65,854
Housing and Outdoor Maintenance for the Elderly (HOME) $17,400
GMDCA - Child Daycare $17,448
CASH Homeline $1,616
$182,318
The human services portion consists of HOME, GMDCA and CASH Homeline. The entire
budget reflects an increase of $476 from last year, and 20% of the total is allocated to human
services. As a result, there is a $96 increase over last year's funding to be applied to human
services. The above budget represents this $96 being divided evenly between GMDCA and
CASH Homeline (each increased $48 over their 1998 funding). HOME's funding remains the
same as in 1998.
The Commissioners questioned the meaning of "scattered site affordable housing." This will
be addressed by staff, and the answer shared with the Commission.
The motion of Sharon Ming to support the proposed CDBG budget as submitted by
Planning staff was seconded by Tom Oye; the motion carried.
SHeRPA Senior Study. In order to begin gathering input for the Senior Study, Lynne
Westphal reported that SHeRPA staff had recently met with Edina staff —the Police Chief,
Senior Center Coordinator, City Sanitarian, Fire Chief and Associate Planner. The Senior
Study is being done for Edina and Richfield; Eden Prairie and Bloomington will not formally
participate. A task force will not be convened; educational events will provide opportunities
to gather input from the community. SHeRPA will meet regularly with City staff for their
input at various stages and to keep them apprised of the study's progress. Currently, Edina's
staff has provided SHeRPA with demographic and housing- related information. With the help
of grant money and reserves, it is anticipated that a part-time research assistant will be hired.
Edina Community Health Partners (ECHP). Tom Oye reported on the newly- formed
collaborative —ECHP —which represents the merger of CHAC and ECA. The mission of
Edina Community Health Partners is to promote healthy community attitudes, norms and
behaviors through collaborations within Edina around the issues of alcohol, tobacco, other
drugs and violence. At the current time, there are approximately 20 members in ECHP-
including the City and Police, School, service clubs, senior citizens, and healthcare. Tom
indicated that there had recently been an article in the Sun - Current about the rowdy behavior
of Edina students at high school hockey games. A proposal-was submitted by Grace Church
to bring a secular, anti -drug program by the Power Team into the school. The proposal was
endorsed by ECHP for presentation to the teachers for approval. It was turned down because
of scheduling problems and experience in the past of Power Team presenters inserting an
evangelistic segment. At the current time, the High School Target Leadership Team is
promoting two projects -1) adopt a hallway and cleaning up the cafeteria; and 2) Students
Assisting Students Successfully. There appears to be strong student interest around these two
projects, and the Team is discussing how to build and broaden these initiatives. Tom reported
that the City's Health Advisory Committee was focusing on tobacco abuse issues and would
be connecting with ECHP. Discussions will begin in March regarding effective preparation
for the Federal Safe and Drug -Free School Grant, with follow -up planning by a sub - committee
in anticipation of a July deadline.
Community Council. Sharon Ming reported that FamiLink Edina would once again partner
with the Minnesota Accounting Aid Society (MAAS) to bring tax preparation assistance to
low income households. Sessions are already filling up, creating waiting lists. FamiLink staff
screen clients and make appointments, and the overall coordination, including that of the
Eden Prairie site, is provided by the FamiLink Coordinator. The FamiLink Client Intake
Database (CID) was implemented on February 1, and now all client records and data are being
stored in the CID. This complex, multi - purpose piece of software will facilitate ease of
communication between clients, FamiLink and agencies, as well as provide valuable data to
the community about needs, gaps and barriers. Sharon reported that she and Sandra
Stevenson recently went before the Community Education Services Board to present the
budget, and it is currently in process. At a Community Council Meeting, Doug Johnson and
Christine Weymouth provided discussion on the proposed community -wide initiative around
asset building. At this time, the task force is taking tiny steps; the first big step will be in the
fall when the Search Institute survey is administered to Edina students in grades 6 -12. As a
result, there will be a follow -up Town Meeting in January to present the results of the survey
to the community. The Commission wants to be connected and informed regarding the
developments around asset building.
Volunteer Recognition Reception. The event will be held on April 20`h at Edinborough
Park, and the Commission discussed how it .could participate.. Tom Oye's motion to
recognize the Edina Police Department for its support of the Commission was seconded
by Sharon Ming; the motion carried.
South Hennepin Housing Educational Forum. Lynne Westphal reminded the
Commissioners of the affordable housing forum in Richfield on February 25`h from 6:30 to
9:00 PM to be moderated by George Latimer.
League of Women Voters Open House at City Hall. Lynne Westphal announced that once
again the LWV will be sponsoring an Open House at City Hall on Saturday, March 20`h, from
10 AM to noon. The Commission could have an informational table in the Council
Chambers at that time.
High School Assembly. During the assembly at the High School for Black History Month,
flowers as corsages for the members of the Multi - Cultural Club were provided by funds
within the operating account of the Commission. The Club members served as facilitators
and presenters during the assembly, which included Kirby Puckett as the guest speaker.
Adjournment. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:10 PM.
Respectfully submitted,
Ardis Wexler, Chair
Edina Human Relations Commission
AW /sh
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 273'
Regular Meeting, March 22, 1999, 7:00 P.M.
Room 350, Edina Community Center
AGENDA
Regular Board Meeting
Determination of Quorum and Call to Order
Approval of Minutes of Meeting of March 8, 1999
*
ATTACHED DETAIL.)
PRESENTATION - South View Middle School History Day
633
ACTION Paae
339 Personnel Recommendations 634 -636
340 Approval of Expenditures Payable on March 22, 1999 637
341 Approval Procedure for Expenditures Payable on 638
April 12, 1999, and April 26, 1999
2 Class Size Guidelines, 1999 -2000 639 -640
(Tabled at 3/8/99 Meeting)
343 Revised 1998 -99 Debt Service Budget 641 -642
344 Proposed 1999 -2000 Debt Service Budget 643 -644
345 1999 -2000 Technology Fund Budget 645 -652
CONSENT
346 Community Education Services Personnel Recommendations 653
347 Gift from Karen and Robert Herman 654
348 Gifts from French Immersion Parent Organization 655
HEARINGS OF INDIVIDUALS, DELEGATIONS, AND PRESENTATION OF PETITIONS
FROM THE PUBLIC ON ANY ISSUE ( *SEE ATTACHED nRTATT._1
DISCUSSION
*9 Revised Community Services Fund (04) for 1998 -99 656
350 Proposed Community Services Fund (04) Budget for 657 -659
1999 -2000
351 New Policy 6174 - Ins.truction, Provision of Special 660-662
Education and Related Services at Private Schools
REPORTS
Elementary Social Workers - Katie Williams
INFORMATION
352 Edina High School Orchestra Tour 1998 -99 663
353 Habitat for Humanity Trip to San Francisco 664
354 Habitat for Humanity Trip to New Orleans 665
355 Staff Recognition . 666
Adjournment
* Persons who wish to address the Board are requested to complete and
submit an appropriate form to the Board Secretary prior to the designated
hearing time. When recognized, each individual shall identify
himself /herself and the group represented, if any. He /She shall then state
the reason for addressing the Board and shall be limited in time at the
discretion of the Board chair. Individual employees of the School Distric
or representatives of employee organizations shall have utilized 1%
administrative procedures before making a request to address the Board.
•
4"
Association of
Metropolitan
Municipalities
April 1, 1999
TO: Mayors, Manager /Administrators, and Councilmembers
FROM: Gene Ranieri, AMM Executive Director
RE: TAB Vacancy /AMM Board Vacancy
TAB Vacancy
A recent resignation from the Transportation Advisory Board (TAB) has created
vacancy that must be filled by a city elected official. The TAB assists in the
preparation of the regions transportation program and plans. The TAB meets monthly
(fourth Wednesday at 1:30 p.m.) at the Metropolitan Council.
The AMM Board is seeking candidates to fill the un- expired term (18 months).
Eligible applicants must be an elected city official. If you are interested please send
by April 26, 1999 a cover letter and resume to Gene Ranieri. The board at its May
meeting will consider all nominations. The Metropolitan Council will then approve
the board nominee.
If you have any questions or need additional information please contact me at 651-
215 -4001.
AMM Board Member vacancy
AMM Board of Director elections will be at the May 20, 1999 Annual Meeting. At
this time it appears there will only be onr- open.seat on .the Roard created by the
resignation of Jim Prosser. Based on past concerns for geographic and elected versus
appointed representation, his replacement should be an elected official from suburban
Hennepin County. Please respond with letter and short resume to Gene Ranieri by
April 26, 1999. The nominating committee is meeting at 12:15 p.m. Wednesday,
April 28, 1999.
L\ msdocs \bod\4- 99tab- bodvacancylett.doc
145 University Avenue West
Saint Paul, Minnesota 55103 -2044
Telephone: (651) 215 -4000
Fax: (651) 281 -1299
E -mail: amm @amm145.org
MARY TAMBORNINO ?�YiN °oo PHONE
COMMISSIONER .LiY� 348 -7886
FAX 348 -8701
ESOP' .
BOARD OF HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
A -2400 GOVERNMENT CENTER
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55487 -0240
Mayor Glenn L.Smith
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424 -1394
March 29, 1999
I
Dear Mayor - Smith.
J
I am writing this letter to express my support of the proposed collaboration set to take
place between the Hennepin County Library Department, the City of Edina, and the West
Metro Education Program which will result in a new building, including a new library.
There is always appropriateness to aiding in the continuing education of the citizens of
Hennepin County. The proposed collaboration that will come before the Edina City
Council provides another arena in which to enrich the lives of many.
Sincerely,��y,
Mary Tambornino
INTERNET: Mary .Tamborninooco.hennepin.mn.us NOT PRINTED AT GOVERNMENT EXPENSE
PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
MAR -25 -1999 09:24
FAX TRANSMITTAL
STEVENS FOSTER CO.
To: Susan Heffigg and the
City of Edina staff
Phone:
Fax:
6129218369 P.Olibl
Date: March 23, 1999
Number of pages ind. cover sheet: 1
From: Virginia Sweeny
League of Women Voters of Edina
Phone: 942 -4225
Fax:
CITY HALL TOUR A GREAT SUCCESS!!!
What a wonderful job you all did on the Saturday open house and tour!!! And
what a great response from all the folks who attended. It was a real pleasure to be
part of such a great community event and to work with all of you.
The new "Kids Get to Vote" station was an inspired addition to the event, and one
I'm sure we'll want to expand in the future.
Here are the results of the vote:
YES NO
If breakfast were served at school, would you eat it there? 38 59
Would you like it if all kids in Edina schools wore uniforms? 25 72
If there were bike paths would you ride your bike to school? 71 26
Is it okay for adults to smoke in front of kids? 1 96
And for mayor of Edina for a day, 10 votes for Dad
8 votes for Mom
7 votes for various teachers
5 votes for Jesse Ventura
2 votes for Buffy the Vampire Slayer
and 1 vote each for the fire department, Ken Griffey, Jr., Jack Morris, Kirby Puckett
and "godsilla ".
TOTAL P.01
S
litti warfflest tkarrks
foryour kiKdrress
YvAAC),„ 6
P,VA,e- vo-L 10 Y\Ab�- A�
b-04— -L- - Y%--N
eA4
rv�
,r
W^t Nof -1
Jul), 16,1998
Dear Friends of the Edina Library,
An exciting proposal has been introduced to the city council by Edina
city manager, Ken Rosland. This proposal is for the constriction of a senior
center and new Edina Community Library to be built on the Kunz -Lewis site.
This vacant 8 -acre lot is located on Eden Avenue. The plan calls for the city
to purchase the current library and renovate it for a new police headquarters
and jail.
This is a fabulous opportunity for the city and the 20,000 to 25,000
Edina residents who use the library each month. This city project can be built
with tax increment financing. No referendum would be necessan• to finance
this project.
The senior center/library development would create a superior facility.
More useable space and better, quicker technology would enhance benefits to
all librar}• users. Larger meeting rooms would accommodate a wide variety
of community prograniming. The current parking problem would be
alleviated. Even desperately needed book storage for the book sale could be
obtained. The possibilities for users and volunteers alike are endless'
The library is a vital neighborhood resource with Edina patrons
checking out 40,000 to 50,000 items each month. Forty percent of these
materials are from the juvenile collection. The library is truly used by all
residents.
To make this a reality, the Edina Friends need to be pro - active. We
need to let our city government know that we support this initiative. I urge
each member of the Friends to contact city council and city staff to show our
desire to see this proposal come to fruition. Contact Glenn L. Smith, Mayor
of Edina, at 4801 West 50" Street, Edina, MN. 55424.
A new library is a valuable asset our community will benefit from for
years to come. Join with the Friends in letting our voices be heard on this
important issue.
Sincerely,
Jennifer Roach
President, Friends of the Edina Library
4608 Tower St.
`4 Edina, MN. 55424 920 -8079 �' awe-/
A9A1 111-.6 C/lMU C. ---. ICA:__ 11:..........x.. CCA'fA
ROY TERWILLIGER
Assistant Minority Leader
115 State Office Building
100 Constitution Avenue
St. Paul, MN 55155 -1206
(612) 296 -6238
Home:
6512 Navaho Trail
Edina, MN 55439
(612) 941 -8258
March 15, 1999
Gordon Hughes
City Manager
City of Edina
4801 W. 501h St.
Edina, MN 55424 -1394
Dear Gordon:
illi 11 11 I;i
i� ms's
i ir�f yr-- - Ny�i
rirU�arr1 -! r Y 1r irin gi�rti�i7r�
Senate
State of Minnesota
Many thanks for your March 4, 1999, letter in opposition to concealed carry legislation.
Let me say plainly, I agree. I can see nothing positive coming from putting more guns into
public places, either for innocent citizens or for our public safety officers.
Gordon, you can count on my strong opposition to this legislation.
f
RO RWILLIGER
Sta a Senator
RT:pr -
ZJ
Recycled Paper COMMITTEES: Finance • Governmental Operations and Veterans • Health Care • Rules •
20% Post- Legislative Commission on Pensions and Retirement • Council on Black Minnesotans
Consumer Fiber SERVING: Eden Prairie • Edina