HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999-06-01_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
JUNE 1, 1999
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL
ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the
Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda
items marked with an asterisk ( *) in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered
routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items
unless a Commissioner, Council Member or citizen so requests it. In such cases the item will be
removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the Agenda.
* I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA - Regular Meeting of May17,1999
II. WMEP UPDATE
III. REQUEST FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING REBATE - Edina School District
►Ilcall IV. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS -as per pre -list dated 5/26/99, TOTAL: $2,851.65
V. ADTOURNMENT
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
* I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Minutes of May 17,1999
II. PUBLIC HEARING OF PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS - Affidavits of Notice by Clerk.
Presentation by Engineer. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. If Council
wishes to proceed, action by resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of the
Council required to pass if improvement is petitioned for; 4/5 favorable rollcall vote
required if no petition
Rollcall A. GLENGARRY PARKWAY STREET RESURFACING IMPROVEMENT A -186A
Rollcall B. MERRITT CIRCLE CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENT A -186B
Rollcall C. BROOKVIEW AVENUE & WEST 56TH STREET CURB AND GUTTER
IMPROVEMENT B -096
)Ilcall D. CORNELIA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL NEIGHBORHOOD SIDEWALK
IMPROVEMENT S -077
Rollcall E. COUNTRYSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL NEIGHBORHOOD SIDEWALK
IMPROVEMENT S -076
Agenda/Edina City Council
June 1, 1999
Page 2
III. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS - Affidavits of Notice by
Clerk. Presentation by Planner Public Comment heard. Motion to close hearing. Zoninjz
Ordinances: First and Second Reading require 4/5 favorable rollcall of all members of
Council to pass. Waver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall of all members of Council
to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: 3/5
favorable rollcall vote required to pass. Conditional Use Permit: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote
required to pass.
A. SET HEARING DATE - EDINA'S COMPREHENSIVE PLAN YEARS 1999 -2005
(6/15/99
IV. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS
A. Metropolitan Radio Board Antennae Request
V. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS
VI. CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
A. Parkwood Knolls Residents Traffic Concerns
VII. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES
VIII. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL
IX. MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEM
X. FINANCE
Rolicall A. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS as per Pre -List dated 5/26/99 TOTAL: $981,088.55
SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING-MEETINGS -
Tues.
Jun 15
Regular Council Meeting
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Mon
Jul 5
INDEPENDENCE DAY OBSERVED
- City Hall Closed
Tues
Jul 6
Regular Council Meeting
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBER!
Tues
Jul 20
Regular Council Meeting
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Tues
Aug 3
Regular Council Meeting
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Tues
Aug 17
Regular Council Meeting
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Mon
Sep 6
LABOR DAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed
Tues
Sep 7
Regular Council Meeting
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Tues
Sep 21
Regular Council Meeting
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
06/0,1/99 TUE 14:50 FAX 612 340 7800 DORSEY & WHITNEY 16002
w
l
NEMORANDUM
TO: Acting Mayor and Members of the City Council
Gordon L. Hughes, City Manager
FROM: Christopher Smith
DATE: June 1, 1999
RE: Mayoral Vacancy
Vacancies in elective offices are governed by Minn. Stat. § 412.02, subd. 2a. The
Statute provides that a vacancy in an office "shall be filled by council appointment." Although
the statute does not mandate when the appointment must be made, any vacancy should be tilled
as soon as possible. The law does not require the city to advertise a council vacancy although a
city could choose to do so. The law also does not require the city to interview prospective
council members or to follow any set procedures. These matters are within the discretion of the
council.
The council may appoint any individual who is otherwise eligible for election.
Under state law, this means the person selected must be at least 21 years of age, a citizen of the
United Slates, a resident of the state for at least 20 days, and a resident of the City of Edina. The
council may appoint a current council member or any other eligible resident of the city. I the
council is voting to appoint a current member of the council as mayor, the interested council
member should not participate in the vote. Sce Minn. Stat. §471.46 (A city council member may
be appointed to the office of mayor but "the member shall not vote in the appointment." )
In the present case, the mayor's resignation has created a vacancy. The
appointment of a new mayor must be made by the city council. The appointment shall be made
by a majority vote of the retraining four council members at a regular or special treeting of the
council. if there is a tie vote, the statute provides that. "the mayor shall make the appointment."
Since the mayor's office is vacant, the acting mayor shall make the appointment if there is a tie
vote. See Minn. Stat. § 412.121 ("The acting mayor shall perform the duties of mayor ... III Case of
vacancy in the office of mayor, until a successor has been appointed and qualifies. ") The acting
mayor may select any qualified person and does not need to choose from those individuals
considered by the council. The acting mayor, however, may not appoint himself or herself as the
mayor.
Since there are less than two years left in the mayor's term, the person appointed
to the mayor's office shall serve the remainder of the term., Minn. Stat. § 412.02, subd. 2a was
amended in the 1999 legislative session to allow cities the option of holding a special election
06/01/99 TUE 14:50 FAX 612 340 7800 DORSEY & WHITNEY V X003'
following the appointment, even though less than two years remain in the term. See 1999 Minn.
Laws ch. 75. "Phis change, however, is not effective until August 1, 1999. Assuminb the
mayoral appointment is made prior to this date, the city does not have the option to hold a special
election. The newly appointed mayor will serve until the end of the unexpired term.
If a current council member is appointed as mayor, then there will be a vacancy in
that council position. The vacancy must be filled using the same procedure as above. The
council make% the appointment, and in the event of a tic, the mayor makes the appointment.
Depending, on the length of time left in that council member's tern, a special election tnay be
required. If more than two years, remain in the unexpired term, the appointed council member
serves only until a special election is held. The individual elected at the special election shall
serve the remainder of the term.
Under current law, the special election must be held at the next regular city
election. Effective August 1, 1999, the law has been amended to give'citics an option as to when
to hold the special election. The new law provides that a special election shall be held "at or
before" the next regular city election. See 1999 Minn-laws eh. 75. The law does not specify
whether a city may utilize this provision if the vacancy occurs before August 1, 1999. It appears,
however, under the plain language of the statute, that the city would have the option of holding a
special election prior to the next regular city election if more than two years remain in the
unexpired term. To use this provision, the new law requires the city council to pass an ordinance
specifying under what circumstances it will hold a special election to fill a vacancy at times other
than the next regular city election. The city, however, retains the option to wait and hold the
special election at the next regular city election.
-2-
06/9ly/99 TUE 14:51 F.4X 612 340 7800 DORSEY & WHITNEY
ST.No. 257, 2nd Engrossment
41� A51, 0'1� A
KEy: man = old language to be removed
prjd%:Lscojed = new Language to be added
2004
Page 1 of 1
NOTE: If you cannot see any difference in the key above, you need to c} angc.tlie,disp2 of stricken and/or
underscored language.
Author and Statue ■ . l=ist versions
SY No. 257, 2nd Engrossment: 81st Legislative Session (1999 -2000) Posted on 4/12/99
1,1 A bill for an act
1,2 -relating to statutory cities; perm:itG],ng special
1.3 elections in cases of certain vacancies; amending
1.4 Minnesota Statutes 1998, sections 205.10, subdivision
1.5 2; and 412.02, subdivision 2a.
1.6 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE S'T'ATE OF MINNESOTA:
1.7 Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 1998, section 205.10,
1.8 subdivision 2, is amended to read:
1.9 Subd. 2. (VACANCIES IN CITY OFFICES.] Specirsl elections
1.10 shall be held in statutory cities onj lane `' gwnieipal
1.11 to fill vacancies in elective city offices as
1.12 provided in section 412.02, subdivision 2a.
1.13 Sec. 2.. Minnesota Statutes 1998, section 412.02,
1.14 subdivision 2a, is amended to read:
1.15 Subd. 2a. (VACANCY.) Except as otherwise provided in
1.1,6 subdivision 2b, a vacancy in an office shall be filled by
1.17 council appointment until an election is held as provided in
1.18 this subdivision. In case of a tie vote in the council, the
1.19 mayor- s:haall make the appointment. If the vacancy occurs before
1.20 the first day to file affidavits of candidacy for the next
a..23 regular city election and more than two years remain in the
1.22 unexpired term, a special, el.ectiori 4hall be held xac
1.23 the next regular city election and the appointed person shall
1.24 serve until the qualification of a successor elected at a
1.25 special election to fill the unexpired portion of the term. If
2.1 the vacaricy occurs or or after the first day to file affidavits
2.2 of candidacy for the regular city election or when less than two
2.3 years remain in the unexpired term, there ehell lee-no need not
2.4 kq special election to fill the vacancy and the appointed
2.5 person shall serve until the qualification of a successor
2.6 ' wetwlfio t- ==. The council mustsp�cify., by
2.7 ordirl ance under what. circumstances it will hold ecial
2.8 eleGtiPn, r�o f 1�� vacancy o Y 4r til, a special election held at
2.9 the same time as the requlNr city:
06/01/99 TUE 14:51 FAX 612 340 7800 DORSEY & WHITNEY
Servile Bill Status Document Display Document 1, of I
M-M - --Z......I..........., ..............
Senate Bill Status Document Display Document 3. of I
. Senate Bill Status Search Form Souse Bill Status Search Fq
Pagc I of 1
Bill Name: SP'0257 . Text . ...... . Revisor Number: 99-1162
House St;at')S
Chief Author: Robling
Authors Johnson, D.E.
Authors Otirada
Author: Kelly, R.C.
companion Files 14PO182 B i. 11'.. Ti ,-; " kLq!A�eL..
—77
Short Description: Statutory cities special elections to fill office vacancies
Lona Description
t-1frilrial Arfinnc-
Action I CommitteelDescription Roll Calli
101125/1999 Introduction and first reading
01/25/1999 [R—cfe-r–re- d' to JFE� �ction La
ass as amended K9 2La�
"0�3101/129.99',Commiuee report: To p,
1/1 11:Second reading SPP:
..... ..
10enerat Orders: To pass 544
i&ilu 9 .
Calendar: Third reading Passed
623
ro-4/0�j�jtuii�e—d—from House with amendment] 1408
-771
�
,Senate concurred and repassed bill l 401811
04/09/1999 40
IThird eading 1.
...........
Presentment date 1714
ov6mor's action Approval
04/20/99
ItSecretary of State [Ch. 75 04/20/99
F
Effective -date August 1:1999
Senate Bill Status Search-ForM Rouge Bill Status Search Form
.............................
MINUTES OF THE
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
HELD AT CITY HALL
MAY 17, 1999 - 7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Faust, Hovland, Kelly, and Vice
Chair Maetzold.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Hovland
and seconded by Commissioner Faust approving the Council Consent Agenda as
presented.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold
Motion carried.
*MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND
REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FOR MAY 3, 1999. APPROVED Motion made by
Commissioner Hovland and seconded by Commissioner Faust approving the
Minutes of the May 3, 1999, Regular Meeting.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
CLAIMS PAID Commissioner Faust made a motion approving payment of the
following claims as shown in detail on the Check Registered dated May 13, 1999,
and consisting of one page totaling, $182,627.53. Commissioner Kelly seconded the
motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Faust Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold
Motion carried.
There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, Vice Chair Maetzold declared the
meeting adjourned.
Executive Director.
Of Vl
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION
To:
HRA
Agenda Item
HRA II.
From:
GORDON L. HUGHES
Consent
❑
CITY MANAGER
Information Only
❑
Date:
JUNE 19 1999
Mgr. Recommends
®
To HRA
❑
To Council
Subject:
WMEP UPDATE
❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
®
Discussion
INFO/BACKGROUND:
On May 17, 1999, the Legislature concluded its 1999 session. On the final day of the
session, the Legislature passed an emergency bonding bill which, among other things,
allocated $4 million for the Southwest magnet school with a "commitment" by House and
Senate conferees to fund the remaining $10 million needed for construction during the
2000 session. (Although Governor Ventura vetoed a number of line items in the bonding
bill, we are advised that the $4 million WMEP allocation remains intact.) In 1998, the
Legislature funded $3.8 million for land acquisition and related costs. Therefore, a total
of $7.8 million has been funded and $10 million remains unfunded.
The Legislature also imposed new restrictions on the use of tax increment financing with
respect to "social, cultural and recreational" facilities. Under the new law, TIF cannot be
used to finance such facilities after January 1, 2000, unless done so pursuant to binding
contracts or a letter of intent with a developer or contractor entered into before this date.
In our view, libraries, senior centers and community centers are likely affected by these
new restrictions.
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION - WMEP UPDATE
June 1, 1999
Page two
On April 12, 1999, the HRA issued a non - binding letter of intent with respect to a project
involving the WMEP magnet school as well as a public library, bus garage, senior center
as well as private redevelopment north of Eden Avenue. This letter of intent provided that
the project was contingent upon WMEP obtaining "from the Minnesota State Legislature
at its 1999 Session all necessary funding approvals for construction of its portion of the
Project." The action by the 1999 Legislature allows partial but not total compliance with
this contingency.
Alternatives
The HRA seems to have four alternatives at this point:
Alternative 1. The HRA need not take any action at this time. It could instead
choose to wait until the next legislative session to determine if funding is
approved. This alternative, 1) prolongs the HRA's holding period and increases its
attendant costs, 2) reduces the time period available to receive tax increments
from related private development, and 3) extends the uncertainty regarding the use
of the property, and 4) may jeopardize the ability to use TIF for the library and
senior center due to new TIF restrictions.
Alternative 2. The HRA could sell the Kunz Oil and Lewis Engineering
properties to WMEP at an agreed upon price but retain a reversionary right that
would be triggered by, 1) the failure of the 2000 Legislature to fund the balance of
the WMEP related costs, or 2) the inability to obtain rezoning, conditional use or
redevelopment agreement approval from the City and HRA. This sale could also
be conditioned upon WMEP committing to, 1) the immediate demolition of the
Kunz Oil building, 2) the clean up of any on -site contamination (we don't believe
there are significant clean up costs based upon past studies), 3) the completion of
rezoning and conditional use approvals and redevelopment agreements, and 4)
completion of construction drawings for the school and its related facilities. Were
the property to revert, the HRA would re- acquire the property for the net price
paid by WMEP.
This alternative, 1) eliminates the HRA's carry cost during the period of
uncertainty, 2) allows project planning and negotiations to proceed during the
interim, and 3) improves the property for development even if it reverts to the
HRA, but it also 4) extends the uncertainty regarding the use of the property, 5)
potentially reduces the time period available to receive tax increments were the
project to fail, and 6) may jeopardize the use of TIF for the library and senior
center unless a satisfactory letter of intent can be concluded which complies with
the new TIF law. (From a preliminary standpoint, we believe such a letter of
intent could be entered into before the end of the year.)
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION - WMEP UPDATE
June 1, 1999
Page three
The WMEP proposal is also based upon the need to acquire additional properties
adjoining Kunz Oil and Lewis Engineering. The HRA would need to decide if it .
should proceed to acquire these parcels in light of legislative uncertainty.
Alternative 3. The HRA could reject the WMEP proposal and direct staff to
solicit "final" proposals for the private development of the Kunz Oil and Lewis
Engineering properties and potentially some adjacent properties. Proposals could
be solicited from a selected number of developers who submitted preliminary
proposals last year or the HRA could issue a new RFP and thereby obtain a new
set of proposals. In either case, the HRA could request that proposals include a
new library and senior center.
This alternative, 1) does not rely on future legislative actions, 2) may result in
commitments prior to the end of the year so as to safeguard TIF use for the public
facilities, 3) provides a taxable development, but it also, 4) eliminates the .
gymnasium and theater as State funded facilities, and 5) may eliminate the
opportunity to redevelop the existing bus garage site with taxable uses. With
respect to safeguarding TIF for the community facilities, the HRA should
understand that time is of the essence in order to select a developer and .enter into
a letter of intent by the end of the year.
Alternative 4. The HRA could direct the staff to develop plans for a
redevelopment of the Kunz Oil and Lewis Engineering properties exclusively with
public uses. Components of such a development could include a library and
senior center as well as gymnasiums and other public uses.
This alternative, 1) uses the properties to provide needed public facilities, 2) does
not necessitate the submission of private proposals, 3) may not need the
acquisition of additional properties, but it 4) requires the development of new
taxable development within the TIF district if the HRA wishes to finance such
facilities with TIF.
Staff recommends that the HRA discuss these alternatives at the June 1, meeting.
1 I
May 25, 1999
Gordon Hughes
City Manager
City of Edina
5701 4801 W. 50' St.
NORMANDALE Edina, MN 55424
ROAD
Dear Gordon:
EDINA
MINNESOTA I would like you to share with the City Council of Edina that WMEP
55424 continues to be interested in pursuing a magnet school on the Kunz -Lewis
612/928 -2500 site and working in partnership with the City of Edina to help meet their
facility needs.
FAX
612/928 -2501 As you are aware WMEP received $4 million for the beginning
construction of the elementary school in the recently completed legislative
session. Sen. Keith Langseth, chair of the bonding committee, made a
verbal commitment as did other members of the bonding committee to
fund the additional $10 million for construction in the 2000 legislative
session since it is a bonding year. This money would be available in the
2000 -2001 fiscal year. I am convinced from my discussions at the
legislature and with officials from the executive branch that the $10
million will be forthcoming next fiscal year.
The project can proceed with the money allocated by this legislative
session. WMEP can now transfer the $3 million to the City of Edina for
the purchase of the land. The $4 million currently allocated for the
construction of the school will be sufficient for the site development and
beginning construction activity. If approved by the legislature, the $10
million will be available on July 1, 2000, or sooner according to officials
at the Department of Children, Families, and Learning.
It is unfortunate that the full $14 million wasn't allocated by the
legislature this session. WMEP, however, continues to believe that the
project is a viable and worthy one, that the legislature will allocate the
money for the construction in the next legislative session, and that the
enhancements to the community through this joint project will benefit
Edina for many years.
Sincerely,
N
Kenneth Dragseth, A.D.
Superintendent of Schools
WE CARE ♦ WE DARE V WE SHARE
an equal opportunity employer
s
0 491�'11'rj,.
o e
R FP0RT/RECOMMENDATION
II To: HRA
From: GORDON L. HUGHES
CITY MANAGER
Date: JUNE 19 1999
Subject: EDINA SCHOOL DISTRICT
REQUEST FOR TAX
INCREMENT FINANCE
REBATE
Agenda Item HRA III.
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ®
To BRA
❑
To Council
❑
Motion
®
Resolution
ElOrdinance
❑
Discussion
RECOMMENDATION:
.Rebate excess tax increments to Edina School District from the Grandview tax increment
financing district..
Rebate amount for 1997 - $20,000
Rebate amount for 1998 - $20,000
Rebate amount for 1999 - $20,000
REPORT:
On September 8, 1998, the HRA considered this request for 1997 and 1998. On that
occasion, the HRA approved the requested rebate conditioned upon funds being rebated,
"following approval by the Edina School District to study and possibly restructure sidewalks
adjacent to schools" (please refer to the attachment). Based upon this provision, funds have
not as yet been rebated to the School District.
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION -
SCHOOL DISTRICT REQUEST, TAX INCREMENT REBATE
June 1, 1999
Page two
The School District has adopted the attached resolution at its May 24, 1999, meeting. This
resolution renews the request for 1997 and 1998 and has added 1999, as well. This
resolution provides that rebated tax increments will be used to pay the District's assessment
with respect to the sidewalks in the Cornelia School area, and the Countryside School area
as well as the paving assessment in the vicinity of Highlands School. The referenced sidewalk
projects are scheduled for public hearing on the June 1, 1999, City Council Agenda. The
School District also notes that any excess funds will, be used for projects that benefit the
community. Last autumn, the School District suggested that these funds will be used to
resurface tennis courts at the high school, remodel the concession stand at the Community
Center, and install a handicap access door at Valley View.
In staffs opinion, the HRA should authorize the rebates for 1997, 1998 and 1999. Future
rebates will be considered on a year -by -year basis.
MINUTES OF THE
REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
HELD AT CITY HALL
SEPTEMBER 8, 1998, 7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold
and Chair Smith.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Maetzold
and seconded by Commissioner Faust for approval of the HRA Consent Agenda
as presented.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold, Smith
Motion carried.
*MINUTES OF THE AUGUST 17 1998 HRA MEETING APPROVED Motion made by
Commissioner Maetzold and seconded by Commissioner Faust for approval of
the Minutes of the August 17, 1998.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
RESOLUTION APPROVING REBATE OF TAX INCREMENTS TO EDINA PUBLIC
SCHOOLS Executive Director Hughes reported the Board. of Education for the Edina
Public Schools has adopted a resolution requesting the HRA rebate excess tax
increments resulting from the 1988 excess levy referendum. The amount of the
requested rebate is $20,000.00 for 1997 and $20,000.00 for 1998. The rebated
amounts would be collected only from the Grandview Tax Increment Financing District.
The HRA granted similar rebates to the School District for 1991 through 1996. Rebated
funds have historically been used for a variety of projects benefiting both the School
District and the City. In 1991, funds were used to re- condition tennis courts at the
Community Center. In 1992, rebated funds were applied to the cost of rehabilitating the
track at Kuhlman Field. In 1993 and 1994, rebated funds were used for replacing the
playing surface at the Field House at Edina High School. In 1995 and 1996, the funds
were applied to the resurfacing .of the running track at the Edina Community Center and
the resurfacing of tennis courts which are also located at the Community Center.
Director Hughes pointed out the School District's Resolution suggests that the rebated
funds for 1997 and 1998 be used to resurface the tennis courts at the High School,
remodel the concession stand at the Community Center and install a handicap access
door at Valley View Middle School. He reminded Council that the requested rebate is
for 1997 and 1998 only, and any future rebates will be considered on a year -to -year
basis.
1
Following a brief Council discussion, it was suggested the Edina School District be
requested to use the excess tax increments to study and possibly restructure sidewalks
around Edina schools.
Commissioner Maetzold introduced the following Resolution and moved its
adoption:
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina,
Minnesota, does with this approve rebate of excess tax increments in the amount
of $20,000 from the Grandview Tax Increment Financing District for the year 1997
and $20,000 from the Grandview Tax Increment Financing District for the year
1998 to Independent School District No. 273, with payment of funds to be made
following approval by the Edina School District to study and possibly restructure
sidewalks adjacent to schools.- Commissioner Faust seconded the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold, Smith
Motion carried.
FACILITIES REPORT PRESENTED Park Director Keprios explained on July 6, 1998,
the Council received proposals from a number of Edina organizations for development
of the Kunz Oil /Lewis .Engineeringproperty. The proposal, "Edina - A Multi -Use Facility
for the Millennium" advocated the development of a multi - purpose activity center
comprising of gymnasiums, senior center, running track, 50 meter competitive pool,
leisure - pool, -- fitness center, attendant locker facilities, showers and toilets: The proposal
also included an optional domed facility for indoor soccer, football and baseball.
Following the presentation, the Council directed staff to evaluate the proposal and
report back at a future Council meeting.
The evaluation process followed was:
1. Meeting with representatives of the Edina Organizations advocating the
project,
2. City Council tour of Chaska Community -- Center, Lifetime Fitness (Plymouth
and Hopkins Lindbergh Activity Center),
3. Meeting with school district staff,
4. Survey of other similar facilities, and
5. Contact private health clubs regarding potential partnerships.
FACILITY SQUARE FEET
• Senior Center 14,400
• Teen Center /Day Care /Administration 10,800
• Four Basketball Courts/Track 36,000
• Mechanical 12,800
• 50 Meter Indoor Competition Pool 17,600
• Indoor Leisure Pool 6,400
• Multi- Purpose Fitness Center 12,800
2
795
8 FOR ACTION
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 273
Regular Meeting,-May 24, 1999
Volume 70, Report 429
SUBJECT: TAX INCREMENT FINANCE REBATE
Be it Resolved, That
The Board of Education
Request the Edina City Council to rebate the excess tax
increment revenue resulting from the 1988 referendum
levied for fiscal years ending 6/30/97, 6/30/98, and
6/30/99 in the amount of $20,000 each year for a total
of $60,000.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
The City of Edina contains four Tax Increment Financing districts
(TIF) which are also within the boundaries of the Edina Public
Schools. When these TIF districts were established, the tax base
was captured to retire the development bonds and other costs of
the development. The school district receives no additional
revenue as a result of the development until the bonds are
retired. When the voters of the school district approved an
excess levy in 1988, it effectively increased the revenue to the
TIF district rather than producing revenue for the school
district.
The 1988 amendments to the Minnesota Tax Increment Financing Act
include a provision whereby a city with a TIF district may pay
excess tax increment revenue generated by a referendum levy to
the school district. This request can be made annually. The
last approved request was for fiscal year 1995 -96.
If this request is approved, the funds will be used to pay 25% of
the.current sidewalk project petitioned in the Cornelia area
(approximately $7,000), 25% of the current sidewalk project
petitioned in the Countryside area (approximately $16,000), all
of our estimated assessment for the Doncaster Way paving project
(approximately $6,000 per year for 10 years), and the remainder
for projects that will benefit Edina community members. The
referenced sidewalks definitely enhance the safety of our walking
students. The Board Finance Committee has reviewed and
recommends approval of the above.
COUNCIL
CHEC. ..EGISTER
26 -MAY -1999 (. .56) page 1
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT PO NUM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
13432
06/01/99
$36.00
BRAUN INTERTEC
Prof eng sery
115918
CENTENNIAL
LAK PARKS
< *>
$36.00*
13433
06/01/99
$1,740.00
Ehlers & Associates Inc
TIF consulting
16074
GRANDVIEW
PROFESSIONAL S
< *>
$1,740.00*
13434
06/01/99
$1,075.65
Tessman Music Center
Music stands
86172
CENTENNIAL
LAK EQUIPMENT 2737
< *>
$1,075.65*
$2,851.65*
r
MINUTES
OF THE.REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
HELD AT CITY HALL
MAY 17,1999 - 7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Faust, Hovland, Kelly, and Mayor pro tem
Maetzold.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED . Motion made by Member Hovland and
seconded by Member Faust approving the Council Consent Agenda as presented.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold
Motion carried.
*MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 3, 1999, APPROVED Motion made
by. Member Hovland and seconded by Member Faust approving the Minutes of the May 3,
1999, Regular Council Meeting.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONTROL SYSTEM
INMPROVEMENT TS -27 ROAD Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and
ordered placed on file.
Presentation by Engineer
Engineer Hoffman explained that the proposed signal was not part of the Centennial Lakes
master plan. However, after completion of the Edinborough Townhomes and Centennial
Lakes Townhomes; staff has received many calls from residents asking that a traffic signal be
installed at W.. 769, Street and Edinborough Way. He added that with the proposed. new
office buildings; the traffic signal would be warranted. The cost of the signal was estimated to
be approximately $154,260 and would be funded as follows:
50% - State Aid
25% - Special Assessment to office development estimated between $15,040.35
to $23,525.00 payable over three years
25% - Special. Assessment to neighborhood townhomes and cooperatives
estimated between $37.91 to $71.79 payable over three years
Engineer Hoffman added that after the public hearing notices were mailed staff noticed they
contained the legal description of the Edinborough Condominiums, but not the addresses of
the affected units. Therefore, he recommended that Council hold the hearing, but continue
any action until June 15,1999, so new notices could be mailed.
Engineer Hoffman stated Edina, Bloomington and Richfield all participated in the I -494
Integrated Corridor Management System (ICTM). West 7611, Street is a major planned arterial
roadway running parallel to I-494 and meant to serve intra - community and nearby
community non - freeway trips.
Page 1
Minutes/Edina City Council/May 17,1999
I
Engineer Hoffman noted that the proposed signal would not enhance the traffic flow. The
proposed traffic signal would be a safety improvement benefiting the nearby properties
using the intersection for access to their area. He added that most residents responding to the
public hearing notices indicated they believed the office development should bear the cost of
the signal, instead of the residents.
Member Hovland asked how the proposed special assessment allocation was determined and
also about traffic volumes and the corresponding sources of the traffic. Engineer Hoffman
replied that there had been a comparable signal put in at Cornelia Drive and 70th Street so the
assessments were calculated similarly. He added that over the past few years he has received
traffic complaint phone calls for the W. 76th street and Edinborough Way intersection. In his
opinion, the installation of the signal would be a benefit to the residents as a safety
improvement, and now, with the proposed office development warrants for the signal will be
met.
Member Kelly stated he had several questions: were the office and residential portions of
Centennial Lakes platted at the same time; who is requesting the signal installation; has the
office development density been reduced since the original plan was approved; and were
potential buyers of twnhomes in the area informed of the proposed office development.
Engineer Hoffman said that the signal was initiated by staff in response to phone call
complaints and because the time is ripe with the office development occurring
simultaneously. Manager Hughes noted that the Centennial Lakes office and residential areas
were all part of the same master concept plan. He added that the office density has been
reduced since the area was originally planned. Manager Hughes pointed out that
Edinborough Way was a separate development completed before Centennial Lakes.
Therefore, people purchasing Edinborough Way condos perhaps did not know of the
proposed office development. However, Centennial Lakes Townhomes was part of the same
development so buyers should have been informed of the office development.
Member Kelly asked whether the signal installed at Cornelia and West 706, Street was
assessed similarly to residents in the area. He also verified the highest residential assessment
proposed was approximately. $72.00 spread over three years and asked why 50% and not
75% of the project was taken from State Aid dollars. Engineer Hoffman responded that the
Cornelia Drive / West 701h Street project included a larger number of residences reducing the
per property cost. He added that Member Kelly was correct that the highest proposed
residential assessment was estimated at $72.00 over three years. Engineer Hoffman said staff
felt that taking 50% from State Aid was equitable, but Council could decide on a different
formula because another leg of the intersection is a State Aid street.
Mayor pro tern Maetzold asked if funding a third leg of the intersection from the State Aid
Funds would leave the City short on another project. Engineer Hoffman acknowledged that
State Aid Funds are limited, but can be used for qualifying projects at the Council's
discretion.
Public Comment
Albert Mayer, 7400 Edinborough Way, explained he was the president of the Centennial
Lakes Townhomes Owners Association. Mr. Mayer reported when the first residents moved
Page 2
1
Minutes/Edina Ci!y Council/Mav 17,1999
into Centennial Lakes Townhomes, the proposal for the West 76f Street and Edinborough
Way corner was residential. Mr. Mayer added he had talked to the manager of the Ebenezer
Apartments and found that over 300 of the residents do not drive. He said most traffic is cut
through from the offices on France. Mr. Mayer stated he did not have a consensus from the
homeowners regarding whether. or nor they favored the installation. Member Faust asked
Mr. Mayer if he could poll the Centennial Lakes residents by the June 15th hearing. Mr.
Mayer replied he would attempt to poll residents. Member Kelly suggested that Mr. Mayer
have the Townhome Association .Board consider its position on the project and report that
position to the Council, if the homeowners could not be polled.
Don Rognstad, 7540 Edinborough Way, stated he moved into Edina in 1989, and was not
shown any plan for an office before he bought his townhome. Mr. Rognstad asked Council
not to install the light because it will just funnel traffic into the area. Instead he suggested that
a 4 -way STOP sign be installed at West 7811, Street and York Avenue..
John Daffer, 7500 Edinborough Way, said he was not informed of a future office building
when he purchased his townhome. He added that many things at Centennial Lakes are
.different than what buyers were originally told, such as a proposed tot lot (now a croquet
court) and a shuttle to the retail area (never happened). Before
that developers
the offices on France
buildings the traffic signal was not needed. Mr. Daffe
Avenue be asked to contribute to the traffic signal installation cost because they are
contributing the majority of the traffic. Mr. Daffer suggested that all the Centennial Lakes
Townhomes contribute to the improvement, if any are assessed.
Joe Jesseph, 7540 Edinborough Way, said he bought his home in 1996 and also did not know
anything except that the park would be extended. Mr. Jesseph said he became concerned
about the stop light last March and called City Hall. Staff informed him no light was planned
but residents could petition for an improvement. He wondered why the townhomes were
being assessed and questioned whether the signal is necessary. Mr. Jesseph believes. there
should be a protected turn lane on York Avenue and West 76th Street.
Council Discussion/ Action
Mayor pro tern Maetzold suggested that City staff re -notify a larger area before the June 15,
1999, continued hearing if the possibility exists that more units will be included in the
assessments. Member Hovland added that he would like to see sked traffic
to report the
completed over a minimum of forty -eight hours. Member Kelly P
status of any large projects that need State Aid funding in the near future.
Member Kelly made a motion continuing the hearing for Traffic Signal Control System
Improvement No. TS -27 until June 15,1999; directing staff to mail notices of the continued
hearing to all owners of Centennial Lakes Townhomes and to also conduct a traffic study
over a forty-eight hour time period. Member Faust seconded the motion. .
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold
Motion carried.
Page 3
Minutes/Edina Ci!y Counci]/May 17,1999
FINAL PLAT APPROVAL GRANTED HAUGLAND FIRST ADDTION INTERLACHEN
CORPORATE CENTER HAUGLAND COMPANY Affidavits of Notice were presented,
approved and ordered placed on file.
Planner Presentation
Planner Larsen informed Council the subject property is generally located in the southwest
corner of Lincoln Drive and 70, Street. The property measures approximately five acres, is
vacant, and zoned Planned Office District, POD -1. The current zoning has been in place since
1984. Before 1984 part of the site was zoned for office use with the balance zoned for high -
density residential use.
Planner Larsen reminded Council the Preliminary Plat for Haugland First Addition had been
granted April 17, 1999. He added that staff initially believed a subdivision dedication was
due when the property was platted. However, after research it was discovered that the
property was part of the consideration for a 1978 land dedication. The 1978 land dedication is
now part of Van Valkenburg Park. He stated that staff recommends Final Plat Approval
subject to: Landscaping Bond; Executed and Recorded Proof of Parking Agreement; and
Watershed District Permits.
Member Hovland introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption subject to:
Landscaping Bond; Executed and Recorded Proof of Parking Agreement; and Watershed
District Permits.
RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT
FOR THE HAUGLAND 1s" ADDITION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that
certain plat entitled, " HAUGLAND 1s'r ADDITION ", platted by Haugland Company, a
Minnesota corporation, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council on May 17,
1999, be and is hereby granted final plat approval.
Passed and adopted by the Edina Ciiy Council this 17`" day of May 1999. Member Kelly
seconded the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold
Resolution adopted.
*BID AWARDED FOR 6826 CHEYENNE CIRCLE LIFT STATION IMPROVEMENT LS -14
Motion made by Member Hovland and seconded by Member Faust for award of bid for
6826 Cheyenne Circle Lift Station to recommended low bidder, Great Western Corporation
at $59,125.50.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
*BID AWARDED FOR TWO 1999 FIVE GANG FAIRWAY REEL MOWERS FOR
BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE Motion made by Member Hovland and seconded by Member
Faust for award of bid for a hydraulic hammer attachment for a backhoe loader in the
Utility Department to recommended low bidder, Ziegler, Inc., at $16,629.98.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
Page 4
Minutes/Edina City Council/May 17,1999
TRAFFIC SAFETY REPORT OF MAY 4 1999 APPROVED Traffic Safety Coordinator
Bongaarts noted that residents might be in attendance to speak to their concerns. No
residents appeared to speak.
Member Faust made a motion approving Section A of the Traffic Safety Staff Report of
May 4,1999:
1. Installation of staff recommended 'word message' signs with word "School"
added to the symbolic signs already in place on West 70th Street at Heatherton
Trial and at Wooddale Avenue;
2. Installation of staff recommended "No Through Traffic to France Avenue" sign
on Lynmar Lane at West 701h Street,
3. Installation of staff recommended "No Parking" restrictions for 50 feet on either
side of driveway at 7500 Cahill Road;
and to acknowledge Sections B and C. Member Hovland seconded the motion.
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold
Motion carried.
*RESOLUTION ADOPTED AUTHORIZING LOCAL COLLABORATIVE TIME STUDY
(LCTS) AGREEMENT GOVERNANCE PLAN Motion made by Member Hovland and
seconded by Member Faust introducing the following resolution and moving its adoption:
RESOLUTION
WHERAS the cities of Bloomington, Edina, and Richfield are participants, along with
other entities, in a state - sanctioned Family Services Collaborative operated through the
South Hennepin Regional Planning Agency, titled the South Hennepin Family Service
Collaborative ( "FamiLink "); and
WHEREAS, FamiLink has agreed to participate in the Local Collaborative Time Study
(LCTS) revenue maximization activity to generate new funds for the work of its
collaborative.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Edina agrees
to the governance plan concerning the allocation and assignments of decision - making
authority over the public health LCTS revenues generated by the City of Bloomington
Health Division as per the Interagency Agreement with the Cities of Bloomington, Edina
and Richfield.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized
and directed to execute the aforementioned agreement on behalf of the City of Edina.
Adopted this 17th day of May, 1999.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
SUMP PUMP UPDATE PRESENTED Engineer Hoffman noted in December 1997; the
Council authorized a city -wide sump pump inspection program to determine the amount of
clear water inflows into Edina's sanitary sewer system. Howard Green and Associates, the
consultant, hired to complete the inspections, is approximately 95% finished with the
program. Staff felt the consultant's preliminary information should be presented at this time
because summer which is traditionally the time for high inflow from wet weather, is
approaching.
Page 5
Minutes/Edina City Council/May 17,1999
0
i
In addition, Engineer Hoffman, stated staff would be asking the Council to authorize
certified letters be sent to the non - inspected properties and those properties already
inspected, with failed sumps that have not been corrected. The letter will set a ninety day
period for inspection and completion of repairs. The letters will also set a date for
implementing the $100 monthly surcharge on the utility bills for non - compliance either
allowing the inspection or completing repairs.
Engineer Hoffman introduced Tom Kaldunsky of Howard Green and Associates. Mr.
Kaldunsky presented the findings of the Sump Pump Inspection Program. He explained the
City had been divided into four quadrants and that as of May 7, 1999; 13,779 properties had
been inspected with approximately 611 properties remaining to be inspected. Of those
properties already inspected 370 failed the first inspection, 61 had a problem with water
running .over the floor, and 68 were corrected before inspection for a total of 499 properties
discharging clear water into the sanitary sewer system. The potential outflow gallons per
minute could have and most likely did cause the surcharging experienced during the rain
events of 1997. Mr. Kaldunsky postulated that if 611 inspections remain, using a 4% failure
rate, 25 failed pumps would be found with the potential to generate 750 GPM of sanitary
sewer flow. Using an 8% failure rate the potential flow would increase to 1,470 GPM.
Mr. Kaldunsky suggested the following next steps be followed for the remaining inspections,
and those properties who have been notified of their failed system, but have not yet repaired
them, as well as those properties where owners have been notified, but not allowed
inspections to be made. The Council authorize a certified letter that provides: 30 days to
schedule an appointment for an inspection; and sets a starting date for the $100/ month
surcharge on utility billings (as allowed by ordinance).
Mr. Kaldunsky concluded that Howard Green & Associates believes the inspection program
has been very successful so far because Edina's average daily sanitary sewer flow has been
lessened significantly already. Those systems found out of compliance that have properly
connected their sump pumps or redirected the pumps' flow have reduced the average flow
enough to bring it below the point reached, in 1997 when the surcharging happened.
The Council briefly discussed the partial inspection report results. Member Faust made a
motion authorizing certified letters be sent to owners of sump pumps which have not been
inspected or repaired indicating monthly surcharge billings will begin in 90 days if
inspections or repairs are not completed. Member Hovland seconded the motion.
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold
Motion carried.
*RESOLUTION SETTING HEARING DATE OF JUNE 1 1999 FOR IMPROVEMENTS
Motion made by Member Hovland and seconded by Member Faust approving the
following.
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, pursuant to a motion of the Council adopted May 3, 1999, a report has been
prepared by the City Engineer with reference to the Street Resurfacing Improvement A-
186a Glengarry Parkway and Concrete Curb & Gutter Improvement No. A -186b Merritt
Circle.
Vann A
R
A.
Minutes/Edina City council/May 17,1999
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of Edina, Minnesota:
I. The City Council will consider the improvement of such streets in accordance with
the reports and the assessment of abutting property for all or a portion of the cost of
the improvements pursuant to Minnesota States, Chapter 429 as follows:
A. Street Resurfacing Improvement A -186a for Glengarry Parkway; and
B. Concrete Curb and Gutter Improvements A -186b for Merritt Circle.
II. A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvements on the 1sT day of
June, 1999, in the City Council Chambers of Edina City Hall at 7:00 P.M. and the
City Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvement
as required by law.
Adopted this 171h day of May, 1999.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
*I494 CORRIDOR COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT PRESENTED Motion made by
Member Hovland and seconded by Member Faust acknowledging receipt of the I -494
Corridor Commission's Annual Report for 1997 -1998.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
*C.D.B.G. TOINT COOPERATION AGREEMENT APPROVED Motion made by Member
Hovland and seconded by Member Faust approving the following.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE
EXECUTION OF A JOINT COOPERATION AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF EDINA AND
HENNEPIN COUNTY FOR PARTICIPATION IN THE
URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK
GRANT PROGRAM IN FY 2000 - 2002
WHEREAS, the City of Edina, Minnesota and the County of Hennepin have in effect a
Joint Cooperation Agreement for purposes of qualifying as an Urban County under the United
States Department of Housing and Urban Development Community Development Block Grant
(CDBG) and HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME) Programs: and
WHEREAS, the City and County wish to execute a new Joint Cooperation Agreement in
order to continue to qualify as an Urban County for purposes of the Community Development
Block Grant and HOME Programs.
BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED that the current Joint Cooperation Agreement
between the City and the County be terminated and a new Joint Cooperation Agreement
between the City and County be executed effective October 1, 1999, and that the Mayor and the
City Manager /Administrator be authorized and directed to sign the Agreement on behalf of the
City.
Adopted this 17th day of May, 1999.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
NEW ON -SALE WINE AND 3.2 BEER LICENSE FOR SAM AND NICKI'S EMBERS
AMERICA (7700 NORMANDALE ROAD) Manager Hughes noted that Edina Embers, Inc.,
d.b.a. Sam and Nicki's Embers America, 7700 Normandale Road, has filed all necessary
documentation for liquor licensing and paid the necessary license fees. The Planning
Department has reviewed the application and found it complied with all code requirements.
Manager Hughes added the Health Department has reviewed and approved the applicant's
plan for wine and beer storage and service. He pointed out the Police Department have
Page 7
Minutes/Edina City Council/May 17,1999
completed their investigation and submitted_ a memorandum stating the Department's
findings from their investigation.
Mr. John Bryant of Embers America introduced himself to the Council and thanked them for
consideration of his application.
Member Kelly made a motion granting an on -sale wine and 3.2 beer license to Edina
Embers, Inc., d.b.a. Sam and Nicki's Embers America located at 7700 Normandale Road.
Member Hovland seconded the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Faust, Kelly, Hovland, Maetzold
Motion carried.
CLAIMS PAID Motion made by' Member Faust approving payment of the following
claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated May 13, 1999, and consisting of 29
pages: General Fund $197,353.10; C.D.B.G. $1,086.00; Communications $10,300.96; Working
Capital $16,910.75; Art Center $8,107.87; Golf Dome Fund $210.90; Swimming Pool Fund
$3,823.27; Golf Course Fund $125,018.64; Ice Arena Fund $4,561.94; Edinborough/
Centennial Lakes $19,345.38; Utility Fund $39,018.57; Storm Sewer Utility Fund $498.89;
Recycling Program $35,092.44; Liquor Dispensary Fund $189,059.57; Construction Fund
$5,175.27; Park Bond Fund $2,130.06; IMP Bond Redemption #2 $1,600.00; TOTAL
$659,293.61; and for confirmation of payment of the following claims as shown in detail on
the Check Register dated May 4,1999, and consisting of 4 pages: General Fund $474,841.14;
Communications $1,127.83; Working Capital $79.56; Art Center $1,492.64; Golf Dome Fund
$2,520.89; Swimming Pool Fund $1,182.03; Golf Course Fund $2,955.14; Ice Arena Fund
$11,149.65; Edinborough/Centennial Lakes $9,539.76; Utility Fund $11,104.26; Storm Sewer
Utility Fund $217.49; Liquor Dispensary Fund $62,216.43; TOTAL: $578,426.82. Member
Kelly seconded the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Faust, Kelly, Maetzold, Smith
Motion carried.
There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Smith adjourned the. Council
Meeting at 9:00 P.M.
City Clerk
Page 8
J
o1Ve
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
Agenda Item #
II.A.
From: Francis J. Hoffman
City Engineer]
Consent
Information Only
❑
❑
Date: June 1, 1999
Mgr. Recommends
❑ To HRA
® To Council
Subject: Receive Feasibility and
Action
Motion
Public Hearing: Glengarry
® Resolution
Parkway Street Resurfacing
El Ordinance
Improvement A -186a
❑ Discussion
Recommendation:
If the Council determines the project to be warranted and necessary, Council shall
adopt a resolution approving the addition of Glengarry Parkway Street Resurfacing
Improvement A -186a to Highlands Park Neighborhood Street Resurfacing Improvement
A -186, authorize plans and specifications to be completed and bids taken.
Info /Background:
City staff initiated this project as a result of public testimony at Improvement A -186
Public Hearing. The proposed project would involve reclaiming the existing bituminous,
and repaving the roadways.
Staff analyzed the project and feels that the project is feasible from an engineering
standpoint.
Attached is a copy of the Feasibility Study along with Notice of Public Hearing to this
report.
The estimated project cost is $32,400. Funding for this project would be from a special
assessment of approximately $2,400 per all assessable lots.
1 '
k ° ^r�,� FEASIBILITY STUDY Al 86a
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
�y CITY OF EDINA
ra.a
STREET IMPROVEMENTS
HIGHLANDS PARK NEIGHBORHOOD
JUNE 1, 1999
LOCATION: Glengarry Parkway from Vernon Avenue to Ayrshire Boulevard.
i
eras 11RE BLVD AYRSHIRE BOULEVARD
_
�a —....
$a
.......................
— —. .. ....... ... ........ ._...,......._ N
—. —� VERNON AVENUE - - ----- l
INDEE RD
..................g:a.....
5a..............j.__. ..... ...........
Project Location
INITIATION & ISSUES: This project was staff initiated by the Edina Engineering Department as a
result of public testimony during the Public Hearing for Street Reclamation
Improvement A -186 Highlands Park Neighborhood. Residents along the
northerly portion of Glengarry Parkway requested that the entire street be
reclaimed (from Vernon Avenue to Northwood Drive). These residents could
not see, a difference between the two sections of roadway. Staff re- reviewed
the sections of roadway that were seal coated last year; these roadways
included Dundee Road, Mirror Lakes Drive, and Chantrey Road south of
Ayrshire Boulevard. Glengarry was not included with this seal coating.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: The existing roadway was constructed in 1957. This roadway consists of a
28 foot wide bituminous rural section. The pavement is in relatively poor
condition and is very brittle with major and minor block cracking throughout.
This roadway is near the end of its useful life; meaning overlaying or seal -
coating this pavement would not be feasible.
Feasibility Study A186a
Highlands Park Neighborhood
June 1, 1999
Page 2
Pavement Condition on Glengarry Parkway
IMPROVEMENT: This project involves reclaiming the existing bituminous pavement, a process
that grinds up the existing roadway, regrades the road bed, removes all
excess material and repaves the roadway with a two and one -half to three
inch bituminous pavement.
The initial sump survey indicated that a number of homes in this
neighborhood have existing sump pumps. City staff will analyze extending
the existing storm sewer system that will provide an underground stub to
accommodate these homes.
A neighborhood informational packet was sent to these residents with the
Notice of Public Hearing.
All resident letters received are attached to this report.
RIGHT -OF -WAY: Adequate right -of -way exists.
FEASIBILITY: This project is feasible from an Engineering / City standpoint.
EASEMENTS: No additional easements will be required.
COMPLETION: 1999 Construction Season
ASSESSMENTS: A special assessment of approximately $2,400 per assessable lot will be
levied against the residents along Glengarry Parkway. The assessments for
this project will be combined with Improvement No. A -186 Highlands Park
Street Reclamation Project.
Feasibility Study A186a
Highlands Park Neighborhood
June 1, 1999
Page 3
PROJECT COSTS: The total estimated project cost is $32,400 and includes indirect costs of
22.5 %, which includes engineering, clerical, and finance costs.. The -
estimated project cost does not include storm sewer or utility upgrades. Utility
upgrades will be funded through their respective utility fund. Funding for the
entire project will be from a combination of special assessment and utility
funds. This project will be added to Improvement No. A -186 Highlands Park
Street Reclamation Project. See cost summary below.
SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST $23,800
10% CONTINGENCY $ 2,400
TOTAL CONSTRUCITON COST $26.200
15% ENGINEERING & CLERICAL $ 3,900
SUBTOTAL PROJECT COST $30,100
7.5% FINANCE COST $ 2,300
TOTAL PROJECT COST $32.400
PROJECT SCHEDULE: The following schedule is feasible from an Engineering standpoint:
Council Orders Public Hearing .......... ............................May 17, 1999
Receive Feasibility Report ................ ...........................June 1,1999
Public Hearing ............................... ...........................June 1, 1999
Bid Opening . ............................... ...........................June 24, 1999
Award Contract ............................ ...........................July 6, 1999
Begin Construction .......................... ........................August, 1999
Complete Construction ........................ .......................October, 1999
s
3
i
i
t
�-N�=lv�
1
r
E:
May 18, 1999
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
STREET RESURFACING
PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT A-1 86a
GLENGARRY PARKWAY
HIGHLANDS PARK NEIGHBORHOOD
City of Edina
The Edina City Council will meet at the Edina City Hall on Tuesday, June 1, 1999 at 7:00 PM to hold a
Public Hearing on the street recycling, bituminous resurfacing on Glengarry Parkway from Vernon Avenue
to Ayrshire Boulevard. This hearing is being conducted under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes,
Chapter 429.
This hearing has been called as a recommendation from staff as a result of the Public Hearing on May 3,
199 for Improvement No. A -186, Highlands Park Neighborhood Pavement Reclamation. Staff
recommends, after hearing public testimony, that this portion of Glengarry Parkway be added to
Improvement No. A -186. Improvement No. A186 is scheduled for construction in 1999 with the
assessment hearing occurring in late September or early October. The additional estimated project cost is
$32,400. The cost of the project will be funded by special assessment. The estimated cost per assessable
lot is $2,400 and could be divided over a ten year period with interest accumulating on the unpaid balance.
The area proposed to be assessed the cost of the proposed improvement includes:
Lots 1 thru 9, Block 1 and Lots 5 thru 13, Block 2, John E. Anderson's Addition to Edina Highlands.
Your receipt of this notice is an indication that property whose ownership is listed to you is among those
properties which are considered to be benefited by the improvement.
Any inquiries, comments and /or suggestions you may have regarding this improvement may be forwarded
to the City Council or Engineering Department prior to the hearing or presented at the hearing itself. If you
desire additional information, please call Wayne Houle at 826 -0443 between 8:00 AM and 4:30 PM,
Monday through Friday. The City Council can authorize the proposed project immediately upon the close
of the hearing.
Thank you,
Francis J. Ho an, P.E.
Director of Public Works and City Engineer
FJH /cif
City Hall (612) 927 -8861
4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 826 -0390
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612).826-0379
1
o a
CD
. �.
INFORMATIONAL SHEET
GLENGARRY PARKWAY: HIGHLANDS PARK
NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENTS
CITY OF EDINA
PROJECT: The proposed project will consist of reclaiming the roadway along Glengarry Parkway from
Vernon Avenue to Ayrshire Boulevard. If the Edina City Council approves this project it will be added to
the Highlands Park Neighborhood Improvement A -186.
Most streets in this neighborhood were installed in 1957. No concrete curb and gutters are proposed for
this street. Engineering staff will also look at any surface drainage problems that might exist and ways to
help alleviate these problems.
SCHEDULE: The construction for this project should take approximately three to eight weeks depending
on the extent of work to be completed (utility work will generally take longer than just repaving).
The proposed preliminary schedule is as follows:
Public Hearing ....... ...........................June 1, 1999
Begin Construction . ............................... July,1999
Complete Construction ................. September, 1999
Final Assessment Hearing ......... Fall of 1999 or 2000
Please keep in mind that this portion of the Highlands Park Neighborhood Street Improvement Project is
11 proposed only" until the City Council orders it at a Public Hearing. Also, you will be notified of the public
hearing date at least ten days prior to the public hearing.
ASSESSMENTS: The assessments for this project are preliminarily setup on a per lot basis, meaning all
lots will be assessed equally. Assessments are typically added to the tax roll after the final assessment
hearing and can be spread -out over 10 years. Proposed Assessments for this project are +$2,400 per lot
and includes only the pavement reclaiming portion, any utility work will be charged to the City Utility Fund.
NEIGHBORHOOD INPUT OPPORTUNITIES: Residents from this neighborhood will have opportunities
for input at the public hearing, or you can call Wayne Houle at 826 -0443.
saa5 5595 sma stm / sto9 ___ wa5 7
RE BLVD AYRSHIRE BLVD J/
6591 5500 .'A01
5559
5505
SW.
Q• sso9 9vo
�4l 5915 W15
9
��' sstr Wtl
111 sWl _ _ �1
i ss'0 u
W6 --- --
1 56:5
A9+
i
9109
�� Sal3
JJJ55w ___
wlz ,1 -- s.zi
solo a 5501
Wxo
_ ................ _ uW1
9509 F
ssx. a sn9
u _
RECLAIM STREET o
FROM VERNON AVENUE °
SOiS
J TO AYRSHIRE BLVD
.. .. . .......
__ tee- 1 .........
1670 _._.— SZ- 5511 5615 WI]
- sWO ... ............... _
EDEN PRAIRIE RD
NDEE RD VERNON AVE
SfaJ j �r 911 rS I O�� 5901 '' -� 9®10 ""Rj 21�AWAY NDS
NEIGHBORHOOD STREET IMPROVEMENT
/iN ^r��
o e
in
N'�o �o
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Francis J. Hoffman/
City Engineer
Date: June 1, 1999
Subject: Receive Feasibility and
Public Hearing: Merritt Circle
Curb and Gutter
Improvements A-1 86b
Recommendation:
Agenda Item # II.B.
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
® To Council
Action ® Motion
® Resolution
❑ Ordinance
Discussion
If the Council determines the project to be warranted and necessary, Council shall
adopt a resolution approving the addition of Merritt Circle. Curb and Gutter
Improvements A -186b to Highlands Park Neighborhood Street Resurfacing
Improvement A -186, authorize plans and specifications to be completed and bids taken.
Info /Background:
City Council initiated this project as a result of public testimony at Improvement A -186
Public Hearing. The proposed project would involve adding concrete curb & gutter to
the above stated reclamation project along Merritt Circle.
Staff surveyed the neighborhood and the majority (6 against, 5 for) of the responding
neighbors do not support the addition of curb and gutters. If the Council does desire
curb and gutters, a surmountable type curb and gutter would be recommended. Also,
Engineering feels that the project is feasible from an engineering standpoint..
Attached is a copy of the Feasibility Study along with Notice of Public Hearing to this
report.
The estimated project cost is $30,500 for surmountable concrete curb and gutter.
Funding for this project would be from a special assessment of approximately $1:,900
per assessable lot and would be added to the pending assessment for Improvement A-
186.
91NA.1�l
ow a FEASIBILITY STUDY - A186b
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
ay CITY OF EDINA
CURB & GUTTER IMPROVEMENTS
HIGHLANDS PARK NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENTS
JUNE 1, 1999
LOCATION: Merritt Circle from Vernon Avenue to Doncaster Way.
A�HHW BLVD e'ma
Ew-
MERRITT CIRCLE
aoa fine ¢aas � / GO�:://yyJJ
VERNON AVE
mee
WM- AVE �' \
......._ ema .._uva
.... ... ..._ .. am.
ro. fma
.. bne xta dn_
exue ............ ..........e .
me
ema mi^
masme xmi ................................ ................ _ ... ..._.. ............ —... .. ..__.....__..... miu .._NOGE ..
. �5 lFA
miv m
— r
...� acro
I � vna
1\ ev.�v .ma
erax ..................._ ...._...
e..._.._...,, ......, mi e
//^ ea. mon mxn mxe /A
DR
PROJECT LOCATION
N - - --
J l P�
aN
l /
INITIATION & ISSUES: This project was initiated by the City Council as a result of discussion during
the Public Hearing for Street Reclamation Improvement A -186 Highland Park
Neighborhood. During recent surveys of the neighborhood residents
indicated a desire to install concrete curb and gutter along their street.
These results are as follows:
SURVEY STYLE OF CURB NO CURB
BULK HEAD SURMOUNTABLE
No. 1. 1 0 0
No. 2. 7 2 4
No. 3. 1 4 6
Survey No. 3 was sent out at the request of City Council. As you can see 5
residents are for curb and gutter and 6 are against curb and gutter. Also, two
Feasibility Study A -186b
Merritt Circle
June 1, 1999
Page 2
of the five residents against the project, had previously wanted curb and
gutter installed.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: The existing roadway consists of a 28 foot wide bituminous rural section.
IMPROVEMENT: The majority of the recent survey results request that no concrete curb and
gutters be installed with this project. If the Council chooses to include adding
concrete curb and gutter to this street during the pavement reclaiming
process, a surmountable type concrete curb and gutter would be
recommended due to the results of this most recent survey. Driveway
aprons would not be installed with a surmountable concrete curb and gutter
system. As driveway aprons would be installed with a bulkhead style
concrete curb and gutter.
RIGHT -OF -WAY: Adequate right -of -way exists.
FEASIBILITY: This project is feasible from an engineering / city standpoint.
EASEMENTS: No additional easements will be required.
COMPLETION: 1999 Construction Season as part of the Street Reclamation Improvement A-
186 Highland Park Neighborhood.
ASSESSMENTS: A special assessment of approximately $1,900 to $2,900 per assessable
lot will be levied against the residents along Merritt Circle. Assessment
costs related to the surmountable versus the bulk -head is $1,900 and $2,900
per each home respectively. Any additional assessment costs for curb and
gutter will be added to the special assessments pending on Improvement No.
A -186 for each individual lot.
PROJECT COSTS: The total estimated project cost is $30,500 to $47,000, depending on the
surmountable versus bulkhead curb and gutter, and includes indirect costs of
22.5 %, which includes engineering, clerical, and finance costs. Funding for
the entire project will be from special assessments.
PROJECT SCHEDULE: The following schedule is feasible from an Engineering standpoint:
Council Orders Public Hearing ....... ............................May 17, 1999
Receive Feasibility Report ................ ...........................June 1, 1999
Public Hearing ............................... ...........................June 1, 1999
Bid Opening . ............................... ...........................June 24, 1999
Award Contract .... ............................... ..........................July, 1999
Begin Construction ........................... .........................August ,1999
Complete Construction .................... .....................September, 1999
May 18, 1999 City Of Edina
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CURB & GUTTER IMPROVEMENTS - PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT NO. A -186b
MERRITT CIRCLE
The Edina City Council will meet at the Edina City Hall, on Tuesday, June 1, 1999 at 7:00 PM, to consider the
Public Hearing on the addition of concrete curb and gutter along Merritt Circle. This hearing is being
conducted under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429.
This hearing has been called as a request from Edina City Council resulting from the Public Hearing of
Improvement No. A -186, Highlands Park Neighborhood Pavement Reclamation. The estimated project cost is
$30,500 to $47,000. The cost of the project will be funded by special assessment. The estimated assessment
cost is $1,900 to $2,900 per assessable lot. and can be divided over a ten year period with interest
accumulating on the unpaid balance.
This portion of the proposed project includes installation of a surmountable concrete curb and gutter only. The
pavement reclamation for this neighborhood was approved at the May 3 Public Hearing. The proposed project
would be constructed in 1999 in conjunction with the pavement reclamation project, the final assessment
hearing will occur after the projects are complete in late September or early October. A survey postcard is
enclosed requesting your input as to the scope of work and costs of these curbs.
The area proposed to be assessed the cost of the proposed improvement includes:
Lots 1, and 7 thru 11, Block 2, Lots 1 thru 10, Block 3, Victorsen's Addition to Edina Highlands.
Your receipt of this notice is an indication that property whose ownership is listed to you is among those
properties that are considered to be benefited by the improvement.
Any inquiries, comments and /or suggestions you may have regarding this improvement may be forwarded to
the City Council or Engineering Department prior to the hearing or presented at the hearing itself. If you desire
additional information, please call Wayne Houle at 826 -0443 between 8:00 AM and 4:30 PM, Monday through
Friday.
The City Council can authorize the proposed project immediately upon the close of the hearing.
Thank you,
Francis J. AW,P.E.
rector o Porks and City Engineer
City Hall (612) 927 -8861
4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 826 -0390
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 826 -0379
City of Edina
May 19, 1999
Merritt Circle
Highlands Park Neighborhood Area Residents
Edina, MN
Re: Resident Letter No. 2a
Curb and Gutter Survey
Merritt Circle
Dear Resident:
As many of you know the Edina City Council approved the reclamation of your streets at the
May 3 City Council Meeting. As a request of the neighbors present and of the Council, staff
has estimated additional costs that you would incur if concrete curb and gutter is installed on
Merritt Circle.
The costs for installing concrete curb and gutter along your street varies between $30,500 for
surmountable curb and gutter (similar to Sherman Circle / Olinger Boulevard) and $47,000 for
bulk -head curb and gutter (similar to Ayrshire adjacent to park). No concrete driveway aprons
would be installed with the surmountable curb and gutter as concrete driveway aprons would be
installed with the bulk -head curb and gutter. Additional assessment costs related to the
surmountable versus the bulk -head is $1,900 and $2,900 per each home respectively. Keep in
mind that these costs will be added to the pending assessment of $2,500. Please complete the
attached postcard survey and return this survey by Wednesday May 26.
Please contact me at 826 -0443 if you have any questions regarding this project.
Sincerely,
e��"ev�
Wayne D. Houle, PE
Assistant City Engineer
Attachment
c: File
City Hall (612) 927 -8861
4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 826 -0390
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 826 -0379
•
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Francis J. Hoffman��
City Engineer
Date: June 1, 1999
Subject: Receive Feasibility and
Public Hearing: Brookview
Avenue and West 56th
Street Curb and Gutter
Improvement B -096
Recommendation:
Agenda Item #
II.C.
Consent
❑
Information Only
❑
Mgr. Recommends
❑ To HRA
® To Council
Action
® Motion
® Resolution
❑ Ordinance
❑
Discussion
If the Council determines the project to be warranted and necessary, Council shall
adopt a resolution approving Brookview Avenue and West 56th Street Curb and Gutter
Improvement B -096, authorize plans and specifications to be completed and bids taken.
Info /Background:
The City has received a petition from 27 of the 31 residents in the neighborhood to
install bulkhead style concrete curb and gutter along Brookview Avenue from
Woodland Road to West 56th Street and along West 56th Street from Oaklawn Avenue
to Park Place.
Staff analyzed the project and feels. that the project is feasible from an engineering
standpoint.
Attached is a copy of the Feasibility Study along with Notice of Public Hearing to this
report.
The estimated project cost is $99,400. Funding for this project would be from a special
assessment of approximately $47 per assessable front footage (approximately $2800
per typical 60 foot lot).
s
�y9SN�\
ok e
o
'o ay
CURB & GUTTER IMPROVEMENTS
BROOKVIEW AVENUE AND WEST 56TH STREET
JUNE 1, 1999
FEASIBILITY STUDY - B -096
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF EDINA
LOCATION: West 56th Street from Oaklawn Avenue to Park Place Avenue and Brookview
Avenue from Woodland Road to West 551h Street.
....... 5424 ... 5121 5,25 61N
5426
5120 6,28 5129 5125
5132 ]] 64]2 64]3 5431
5,� ; 61]6 5337 5438
...... 55TH... ST W
5 %0 r601 X00 s3o 1 6600
5504 6;as s94 %as 5c�4
6509 6508 9508 5500 %08
....... ...................... . ._.....
%12 ,55,3 .............. ............ %12.... 65,3 %12
%10 55 t2 5516 517 9ta
5370 5521 ..... .
sir .....55z0
F12 5925 5524 2 SL'S %24
WEST 58TH STREET
®00 901 '1L0 SW1 900
904 as0s 92s 900 %0.
KELLOGG PL -
_.. seas ........_..... s50a
%12 810 920 328 917
% /1\ 00
m
LN ......__._ 5336 6437
181 %00
5505 5504 694
%c
9509 6688
... ..... SSOa F
9813 %12 `
........
%13
6511 5515 ..... _� •�
5521
. 5520
%23
5525
a......_
ssze _ %2a %2r
55]r 553s 563;
96os
912 , 6816
D
9
29
10 ``
6M0
1W.
`512
%15
%12
a24 J 5521
`\ /
550, X00
)N W04
8D
805 9
912 5509 82
%10 915 61
919 \21'1
PROJECT LOCATION
INITIATION & ISSUES: This project was initiated by a petition from 27 of the 31 residents in the
neighborhood. Residents along West 56th Street would like curb and gutter
to help contain the surface water along West 56th Street. Currently these
people are experiencing erosion problems along their front and side yards
from surface water runoff.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: The existing roadways consist of approximately 28 foot wide bituminous rural
section. Concrete curb and gutter exist along West 56th Street from Park
Place to Minnehaha Creek and Woodland Road south of Brookview Avenue.
West 56th Street is the main drainage route for surface water bounded by
south of West 54th Street to the north, midway between Wooddale Avenue
and Kellogg Avenue to the west, Park Place to the east, and south of West
56th Street to the south. Storm sewers do exist along West 56tH Street from
Brookview Avenue to the east.
Feasibility Study B -096
West 56th Street and Brookview Avenue
June 1, 1999
Page 2
West 56th Street looking east at Oaklawn Avenue
Brookview Avenue looking south at West 55th Street
IMPROVEMENT: This project involves removing two feet of the edge of pavement, removing
approximately one to five feet of boulevard, excavating soils within this area,
removing existing ends of driveways, placing a bulkhead style concrete curb
and gutter, then patching the removed bituminous and resodding. All
driveways will receive new concrete aprons. Any sprinklers and other
landscaping disturbed during construction will be repaired.
RIGHT -OF -WAY: Adequate right -of -way exists.
FEASIBILITY: This project is feasible from an Engineering / City standpoint.
Feasibility Study B -096
West 56th Street and Brookview, Avenue
June 1, 1999
Page 3
EASEMENTS: No additional easements will be required.
COMPLETION: 1999 Construction Season
ASSESSMENTS: A special assessment of approximately $47 per assessable front
footage will be levied against the residents along West 56th Street and
Brookview Avenue. As per City policy any lot that has a side yard adjacent
to this project will be assessed one -third of that side frontage. Homes
affected by this side frontage are 5537 and 5601 Oaklawn Avenue; 5536,
5537, 5600, 5601 Brookview Avenue;5536 and 5600 Park Place.
PROJECT COSTS: The total estimated project cost is $99,400 and includes indirect costs of
22.5 %, which includes engineering, clerical, and finance costs. The
estimated construction cost does not include storm sewer upgrades. Any
storm sewer upgrades will be funded through the stormwater utility fund.
Funding for the entire project will be from special assessments. See
summary of the Project Cost Estimate below.
SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST: $ 73,100
10% CONTINGENCY: $ 7,300
TOTAL CONSTRUCITON COST: $ 80,400
15% ENGINEERING & CLERICAL: $ 12,100
SUBTOTAL PROJECT COST: $ 92,500
7.5% FINANCE COST: $ 6,900
TOTAL PROJECT COST: $ 99.400
PROJECT SCHEDULE: The following schedule is feasible from an Engineering standpoint:
Council Orders Public Hearing ....... ............................May 17, 1999
Receive Feasibility Report ................ ...........................June 1, 1999
Public Hearing ............................... ...........................June 1, 1999
Bid Opening ....... ............................... ..........................July, 1999
Award Contract ... ............................... ...........................July 1999
Begin Construction ........................... .........................August ,1999
Complete Construction .................... .....................September, 1999
i
4-c" tg-�- / -k C(-Y1 CL -
qd
May 18, 1999 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING City Of EdInB
CURB & GUTTER IMPROVEMENTS - PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT NO. B -096
BROOKVIEW AVENUE AND WEST 56 STREET
The Edina City Council will meet at the Edina City Hall, on Tuesday, June 1, 1999 at 7:00 PM, to consider the
Public Hearing on the construction of concrete curb and gutter along Brookview Avenue from West 55th Street
to Woodland Road and West 56th Street from Oaklawn Avenue to Park Place. This hearing is being
conducted under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429.
This hearing has been called as a result of a etp ition from 27 of the 31 residents in the neighborhood. The
estimated project cost is $99,400. The cost of the project will be funded by special assessment. The
estimated assessment cost is $47 per assessable front footage can be divided over a ten year period with
interest accumulating on the unpaid balance.
The proposed project includes the installation of concrete curb and gutter only. Any street resurfacing is not
included in this proposal. The proposed project would be constructed in 1999, with the assessment hearing
occurring in late September or early October.
The area proposed to be assessed the cost of the proposed improvement includes:
Lots 1 thru 11, Block 13, and Lots 10 thru 20, Block 14, "South Harriet Park, Hennepin County, Minn. "; Lots 30
thru 38, "Colonial Grove 2nd Addition Edina Minn "; Lot 1, Block 1, Edwards Addition; and Lot 1, Block 3,
Colonial Grove Sixth Addition.
Your receipt of this notice is an indication that property whose ownership is listed to you is among those
properties that are considered to be benefited by the improvement.
Any inquiries, comments and /or suggestions you may have regarding this improvement may be forwarded to
the City Council or Engineering Department prior to the hearing or presented at the hearing itself. If you desire
additional information, please call Wayne Houle at 826 -0443 between 8:00 AM and 4:30 PM, Monday through
Friday.
The City Council can authorize the proposed project immediately upon the close of the hearing.
Thank you,
Francis J. 19off an, P.E.
Director of Public Works and City Engineer
City Hall (612) 927 -8861
4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 826 -0390
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 826 -0379
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Debra Mangen
City Clerk
Date: September 8, 1998
Subject: Receive petitions
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
Agenda Item # V.A.. B. & C.
Consent Lnj
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends El
To HRA
®
To Council
Action ®
Motion
Resolution
Ordinance
Discussion
Recommendation:
Refer the petitions received to Engineering for processing as to feasibility.
Info /Background:
The City received three petitions as follows:
1. Timothy Hendrick, 5017 Edinbrook Lane requesting curb & gutter;
2. Circulated by Teresa McCarthy, signed by residents of Brookview Avenue,
requesting curb & gutter on Brookview Avenue between Park Place and
Wooddale Avenue; and
3. Circulated by Cheri Morris, signed by residents of Oaklawn Avenue, Park
Place, Kellogg Avenue, Wooddale, and Brookview, requesting curb & gutter
on Brookview Avenue between Park Place and Oaklawn..
The City's normal procedure is to refer the petition to the Engineering Department for
processing as to feasibility.
617x. — $7 -
-7 1113
I 510, 5100 510! 5� �t
Sam f —4 6101 1 5409 51oe I
j'_ --� —� r— 3 6.12 $113
r �t 6�1i3 5112 5113 6112 511
i 7 154t0 5116
6117 5116 6417. 5116 6/!7 5116 5117
5421 5121 /
�1 5@1 6121 5126 6421 6420 , 6�1 5425
1 r— r— 5421 5425 5121 5127
1502 ago L I 612i 1 _J Lam— �-- —� I— —� 4z:�� I
—t 1 5126 I fr I 5429
I' r543 6 6120 612e 5: 6132 � 1603 �, , 5 5132 5433 6132 5139 5132 5133 --I sLi7 5136 I d 6437 5136 5137 6137 5136 ���
r
I 650t f 6600 560t Iry0p 5501 �? 5600 56pi\ I 5600 �, �S
5501
06 1601 4502 4500 6506 5b01 56� 5b01 5 5501 5506A 6501 �—
55W S 5506
1 Seas X01 55m I ssora . 5,11 I � 6501
1 56a I 5501 M
O7 6p5 1503 1501 r— —� —1 r— r— 6512 I X13: "� 55u
6313 SH2 { 5613 551 . 6613 __ 4 n 6613
5617 5516 5517 SFil6 5613 61
1 _ 6517 � 5616 5617 � 6618 _ R17 _
5WI F6521
L6E25 5521 ita26 5621) 1 �� 1 1 1
5s29 -- 1 6629 ' 11 �Y I 5527
It I 5633 5632 I 5533 5632. 6533:' . 6633 \ 5524
L _ _ 5537 _6536 5637 X� Xx� } X 5p7
,�._,.a,a.....a.�_._.� - ....e. 6626
ST r 5625
4507 5eoo �(— —I 6600 660! 5801 �U( X 5800 560r 'x —T 56W 56IIf
Sm
LSW1 6606 I 5625 5W1 193e6x�6e01
5806 1 1 6808 6608 M1066 P= � 6606 561fx� Sm
—ll 5617 va � / `�
5616 1 5613 6612 5616 6820 6528 /
4516r 5820 5612 55f5i1� o -- /
6617 5612 5609
30 5618
7
4513 �Of 6833 � � �\ � 5610 - - 5615
— 27
l I 1 66'b I C7 5516 5617 \
I� —1 � I X56 10 5661 Sm 5621
O6 S 1 � � 21 �0 � 5821
I 6666 6866 I fl 26 %N
L1512 I L ym `� �
_ 12 21 22 Sees % 5631
ob QQQ •� 5662 1 5619 bblp� f
TI 570o a ./ / Seel j — 663
/ \ l3 f8 20 _
\I -6701 1 D 1rOml31D 15 /— —� 6863 6W9 5616 5611 %37 \ /
5709 %670e l8 --is T —
I \ �—
] _
I
� 5713 5712 __ I -W /
1428 1 4121 1112D 1 1118 121 I 1321 4320 1316 1312 1130BJ I M / �i l
City of Edina, Minnesota DATE:
CITY COUNCIL R cusIge
4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424
(612) 927 -8861 • (612) 927 -7645 -FAX • (612) 927 - 5461 -TDD
PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL
❑ SIDEWALK
❑ STQRM SEWER
L5 CURB AND GUTTER
❑ ALLEY PAVING
❑ SANITARY SEWER
ONLY ❑ PERMANENT STREET
SURFACING WITH
CURB AND GUTTER
❑ WATERMAIN
❑ STREET LIGHTING
❑ OTHER:
To the Mayor and City Council:
The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to
the locations listed below.
IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT
THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE EMYROVEMENTS AGAINST THE.
PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE U*VROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE
COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES.
PROPERTY OWNER'S
SIGNATURE
OWNER'S NAME
(PRINTED)
SSz-5— &-u-4 j
Mira
circulated by:
PROPERTY ADDRESS
between SSOO
and
C'_?
C off/
/ADDRESS
LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME
A /RESS
A
&11,9,&&11
�o &A' � f j t t'7`
between
Q C e-
and '
)CATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME
ADDRESS
ADDRESS
between
and
LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME
ADDRESS
ADDRESS
between
and
LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME
ADDRESS
ADDRESS
IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT
THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE EMYROVEMENTS AGAINST THE.
PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE U*VROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE
COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES.
PROPERTY OWNER'S
SIGNATURE
OWNER'S NAME
(PRINTED)
SSz-5— &-u-4 j
Mira
circulated by:
PROPERTY ADDRESS
OWNER'S
PHONE
C off/
SS 3 .2 le 3 7G
ADDRESS PHONE
There is space for more signatures on the back or you may attach extra pages.
SEPTEMBM 19W
n,
F
PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNER'S
PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME PHONE
,SIGNA 1_TT"R� h Leca 1 �cCa .r U J
I yrPal 6
as
a�
a
d 7 �3
4
Sp g�m -la 32
j �s ly.�Ti�/%L SSa28 6,2404vi �'l�9"3y33
,'f .
Mf 7 ��
s�lrG1� /.� . 'ccd � _ lv
,u.
1r1A. � j
oe � City of Edina, Minnesota
CITY COUNCIL
•�� 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424
(612)927 -U61 • (612) 927 -7645 -FAX • (612) 927 - 5461 -TDD
PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL
❑ SIDEWALK
❑�, STORM SEWER
U CU/RB AND GUTTER
❑ ALLEY PAVING
❑ SANITARY SEWER
.dam:
W3l4
❑ WATERMAIN
❑ STREET LIGHTING
ONLY ❑ PERMANENT STREET ❑ OTHER:
SURFACING WITH
CURB AND GUTTER
To the Mayor and City Council:
The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to
the locations listed below.
r.,, .I%��� :�� /�y -- - - - between L5-S--257(f) and
LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME /ADD X00
sla 57`^ct74-' between �!G /mil- �� and �-
LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS
between
.CATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME
between
LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME
ADDRESS
ADDRESS
and
ADDRESS
and
ADDRESS
IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT
THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE
PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERNI[INED BY THE
COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES.
PROPERTY O 'S
SIGN
Z
LVI.
� d
petition was circulated by:
NA
OWNER'S NAME. PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNER'S
(PRINTED) CC.X W r.ofs6 `, PHONE
I Ef—IM4
J Ga CJd /1Y0e44VICCL -) JZZ� �(Ol
ADDRESS PHONE
There is space for more signatures on the back or you may attach extra pages. SEPrEMBER,9,
PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNER'S
SIGNATURE- D n - DkMA,l, 5wsr � j/16 'V l
. 1.
r
CV, raoLVV
re e q20
O/ • fr/v
AGENDA ITEM: II.C.
5/25/99
Francis J. Hoffman,P.E.
Director of Public Works and City Engineer
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN. 55424
Dear Mr. Hoffman,
In regards to the letter dated May 18, 1999, pertaining to the proposed project of the
installation of concrete curb and gutters for the 5500 block of Brookview Ave. The
cost that was proposed to us last fall was a lot lower than the estimated project cost in
your letter.
I feel that this cost of $47.00 per assessable front footage is very high and at this time I
do not wish to pay that amount or to have the concrete curb and gutters put in. In the
Fall of 1998 when I signed the petition to have this considered, I was unaware of the
total cost that we would be asked to pay as well as for any Street resurfacing. This
amount is far to high and would not increase the value of my house to justify the cost of
this project.
On record I want my vote for this project to be " NO "
Nancy A. Bradley
5508 Brookview Ave.
Edina, MN. 55424
J VII- 1 -00 1 uc 0-00 1 lnLW rKUUUU I � 1 NU r fin NU, 3NL f eel
F. U1
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HE ��++ {. y of Edina
rER IMPROVEMENTS - PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT NO. B-09�
BROOKVIEW AVENUE AND WEST 56 STREET
The Edina City Council will meet at the Edina City Hall, on Tuesday, June 1, 1999 at 7:00 PM, to consider the
Public Hearing on the Construction of concrete curb and gutter along Brookview Avenue from West 55'h Street
to Woodland Road and Wesf 56`" Street from Oaklawn Avenue to Park Place. This hearing is being
conducted under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429.
This hearing has been called as a result of a etp ition from 27 of the 31 residents in the neighborhood. The
estimated project cost Is $99,400. The cost of the project will be funded by special assessment. Tl:e
estimated assessment cost is $47 per assessable front .footage can be divided over a ten year period with
interest accumulating on the unpaid balance.
The proposed project includes the installation of concrete curb and gutter only. Any street resurfacing is not
included in this proposal. The proposed project would be constructed in 1999, with the assessment hearing
occurring In late September or early October.
The area proposed to be assessed the cost of the proposed improvement includes:
Lots 1 thru 11, Block 13, and Lots 10 thru 20, Block 14, "South Harriet Park, Hennepin County, Minn. "; Lots 30
thru 38, "Colonial Grove 2n° Addition Edina Minn "; Lot 1, Block 1, Edwards Addition; and Lot 1, Block 3,
Colonial Grove Sixth Addition.
Your receipt of this notice is an indication that property whose ownership. is listed toyou. is, among thgsp
properties that are considered to be benefited by the improvement.
Any Inquiries, comments and/or suggestions you may have regarding this improvement may be forwarded to
the City Council or Engineering Department prior to the hearing or presented at the hearing itself. If you desire
additional information, please call Wayne Houle at 826 -0443 between 8:00 AM and 4:30 PM, Monday through
Friday.
The City Council can authorize the proposed project immediately upon the close of the hearing.
Thank you, 03 0, 0 ,
-rC' l•G-fi -��LG ` --
11F J. WoXap .E.
Director of Public Works and City Engineer
City Hatt (G12) 927 - 111)61'
4801 WLSt ,n rl i 5TKFET FAX (612) 026.0390
y
L•DINA, MINNFSOTA 55424 -139 ��� ,V �. �(� _�- TI.)L) (612) 026 -0379
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Francis J. Hoffma ",(
City Engineer
Date: June 1, 1999
Subject: Receive Feasibility and
Public Hearing: Cornelia
Elementary School
Neighborhood Sidewalk
Improvement S -077
Recommendation:
Agenda Item #
Consent
Information Only
Mgr. Recommends
Action
II.D.
❑ To H RA
® To Council
® Motion
® Resolution
❑ Ordinance
❑ Discussion
If the Council determines the project to be warranted and necessary, Council shall
adopt a resolution approving Cornelia Elementary School Neighborhood Sidewalk
Improvement S -077, authorize plans and specifications to be completed and bids taken.
Info /Background:
The City has received a petition from the Cornelia Elementary School Site Council that
included 13 Edina residents to construct concrete sidewalks along Cornelia Drive at
Cornelia Elementary Entrance, Mavelle Drive and West 72nd Street from Cornelia Drive
to Lynmar Drive.
Staff analyzed the project and feels that the project is feasible from an engineering
standpoint.
Attached is a copy of the Feasibility Study along with Notice of Public Hearing to this
report, and all resident letters received. Also attached is a waiver from the Edina
School District waiving the length of advertising time due to an error in the first notice of
Public Hearing. ,
The estimated project cost is $67,000. Funding for this project would be from a special
assessment of approximately $350 per assessable lot based on an area assessment
(see Page 8 of Feasibility Report).
c-
'r
w9sNA1r,�,
o
�� ay
FEASIBILITY STUDY
CITY OF EDINA
CORNELIA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL NEIGHBORHOOD
SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS S -077
June 1, 1999
LOCATION: Cornelia Drive at Cornelia Elementary Entrance, Mavelle Drive and
West 72nd Street from Cornelia Drive to Lynmar Drive.
J--
5 110+ uoo 1306 1301 +300 1221 azo — nu .Mn amo Iwo .. Q. _-j L
70TH ST W
1101 1111 131) 1213 l2DD 1191
m
a
1005 mosol OW
)oW
N
» moe )009 �6 r000-+t
12,6 1213 1105 1231 1200 Int] )012 rots ]�
m13 mt2
M17
VELLE DR
)ot9
m16 ml1 rota
7191 11w ltol mz, l000
m )too
71as ;Ia non FMAVELLE
1m1 )tot ;too
not
)tae 7199 not
7119
711 )Ins )+a
Z
1113 7112 1111
r
5 71oe ;109 )loft loco
aot
m10
10
)too
)1
mo
m,
Mn
)tat
112
7111
)116
)11)
)110
1119
)1N
7135
J
)126
7129
i13p
2
)111
7120
1121
)IM
7129
m
yy
112A
m
1116
11]1
)126
)121
1133
)133
-1
m
�
O_
Ml
)130
1131
71.
cz
71m
71]6
1129
I'm
Mw M
)126
121:1) I
PROPOSED EVEI OPMENT
SIDEWALKS
PROPOSED SIDEWALKS
MAVELLE DRIVE & WEST 72nd STREET
N
W
Q
aUZ
Q
N
>f z
9
to
r
Feasibility Study
Cornelia Elementary Sidewalks
June 1, 1999
Page 2
INITIATION & ISSUES: This project was initiated by a petition from the Cornelia
Elementary Site Council that contains 13 City of Edina residents.
The petition requests the City to consider sidewalk improvements
along West 72nd Street from Cornelia Drive to Lynmar Lane;
Cornelia Drive at entrance to Cornelia Elementary; Cornelia Drive
from West 70th Street to West 66th Street; Mavelle Drive from
Cornelia Drive to Lynmar Lane. At the request of Staff the
petitioners agreed to repetition the City for sidewalks along
Cornelia Drive north of West 70th Street at a latter date. The
request was due to lack of signatures from residents along this
stretch of roadway and the major scope of work for installation of
sidewalks north of West 70`h Street.
Engineering Staff had many conversations with the president of the
Cornelia Elementary School Site Council last fall regarding this
petition for sidewalks. The Cornelia Elementary Site Council
through the School Districts Business Manager submitted
proposed sidewalk layouts for this neighborhood for the proposed
Edina Transportation Plan as part of the City's Comprehensive
Plan update. This neighborhood included sidewalks as shown
below.
CORNELIA
ELEMENTARY
SCHOO
EXISTING
C;IINC- ,RI::1_1..
SIDEWAI.....K
EXIST ING
BITl..JMINOUS
SIDEWALK
PPEPI]SED
`. C.= HO[::::II ..... ...... :BI.J 1 1N,!f:::` S
SIDS W () LK
PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN /BICYCLE FACILITIES
Existing sidewalks exist along the westerly side of Cornelia Drive
from West 72nd Street to West 69th Street, along the northerly side
of West 72nd Street for one block west of Cornelia Drive and at
7128 France Avenue (former site of Lutheran Church of the
Master), along both sides of West 70th Street, and along France
Avenue.
Feasibility Study
Cornelia Elementary Sidewalks
June 1, 1999
Page 3
Staff held a neighborhood informational meeting on May 12.
Twenty -five to thirty residents from the neighborhood attended this
meeting. Some of the issues these residents had regarding the
proposed sidewalks are as follows:
1. The residents requested a neighborhood survey
regarding the alignment of the West 72nd Street
sidewalk. Apparently students walk along the southerly
boulevard area to get to and from the school and buses,
see photo below.
2. Resident maintenance of the sidewalk such as snow
removal.
3. General concern with maintenance of sidewalks south
of Cornelia School along with placement of snow along
West 72nd Street during plowing.
4. Residents want the sidewalks extended around the park
at Lynmar Lane and Mavelle Drive.
5. Other traffic issues such as cut through traffic along
Cornelia Drive and West 72nd Street and other streets
during peak periods.
A neighborhood survey was sent regarding placement of the
sidewalk along West 72nd Street; north versus south side. The
results of the survey are as follows:
Prefer sidewalk along West 72nd Street on:
North side: 24
South side: 10
Support of sidewalk project:
Supports: ...................... 15
Do not Support: ........... 25
All resident letters received by staff are included with this report.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: Cornelia Drive, Mavelle Drive, and West 72nd Street streetscapes
consists of a 30 foot wide bituminous roadway flanked with curb
and gutter on both sides. Right -of -ways for all three street are 60
feet. The southerly right -of -way along Mavelle and the northerly
right -of -way along West 72nd Street contains minimal trees or
obstructions within City right -of -way. The right -of -way along
Cornelia Drive at the school entrance does contain many
deciduous and coniferous trees, however these trees can be
transplanted if required. The topography of the streetscape along
all three proposed sidewalks is fairly level. The streetscape along
the southerly side of West 72nd Street at the easterly end is
obstructed with many plantings.
Feasibility Study
Cornelia Elementary Sidewalks
June 1, 1999
Page 4
Streetscape of Cornelia Drive
Streetscape of Mavelle Drive at Glouchester Avenue
Feasibility Study
Cornelia Elementary Sidewalks
June 1, 1999
Page 5
Streetscape of West 72nd Street at Bristol Boulevard
Mavelle Drive and West 72nd Street serves as an easterly access
for students living in the general area along West 72nd Street, west
of France Avenue, and south of West 70th Street. West 72nd Street
also serves as a sub - regional pedestrianway for area residents
accessing retail establishments east of France Avenue. Traffic
counts for these three streets were taken during the school year
and are shown below. The numbers of potential students that
might utilize these sidewalks are also shown below.
Feasibility Study
Cornelia Elementary Sidewalks
June 1, 1999
Page 6
B rppq +100 tl00 4A4 430D 1 424 I @20 I Ct8 1 4713
I @08 R00
J)10 950
3010 6398
L
70TH ST W
BAl 422+ 4717 Q13
42W SA1
A01 A00
7001 A06
Too"' .O
Q ]
90+
j
'RAS 7004
<
O
A05 ADI
J
7005-07
AW
AM
Mi) 7608
7009 ma
700& I1
O
N 7010
343 ADT
1 328 ADT
SAS Qm
R
AI3 7012
A13 Atx
A +5
A+7
7008
A:
11
A16
A17 '018
A19
7000 no, 6
nos 71W
7101
7105
7150 1$Y MT
A21 1000
I'm
7100
O nog
7109
1103 7101
nu
7100
no,
4001
7101
771
71,3 nr
7119
nos
PROIPOSEDSIO EW LKS
CORNELIA ELEM.
1106 7109
7108
Am
SCHOOL 7116
7117
YDOADT
RAFFIG
122+ 71x0
7.21
7113 7111
7112
HOOL F
7125 7JN
7129
7116 7117
71,5
14
POTENTIAL NUNS ER OF TUD
o
BEYOND THIS POI
n29 n2B
7129
712p 2 7121
fY++
7120 F 1121
Vl
7136
nxe
7.
719,
7125
m
U
7133 7133
n2a o
7124 7125
7+34
1142
n37
7128 Z n2B
7136
7129
7137 7
960 11
3
n2B
Hof •DT
4105
2."GADT DR W
W
7 ST W
410+
720+ 7816
7206 Ttlt
TV6 1201
y.
1�0 Q'9
l283W
N
4104 7105 T1141
Ros rzos
7108
%
0D
7301 7275
7x08
1208 7201.08
M6.0
M6.0
mo -13
T101 -09
L
7
<
T19
4 @12 7112
3
PROPOSED S DEWALKS
=1 1216
.
LE DRIVE &
1250
ST 72nd STREET
oRTHDR
T-1
TRAFFIC INFORMATION
'
IMPROVEMENT: Construct sidewalks along Cornelia Drive, Mavelle Drive, and West
72nd Street. Boulevard style sidewalks are proposed along all three
sidewalk routes with the exception of Mavelle Drive from
Heatherton Trail to Lynmar Lane where a back -of -curb sidewalk is
proposed.
Construction of these sidewalks would involve removing 4 -8 inches
of topsoil and replacing with a 4 inch concrete sidewalk over a 4
inch aggregate base. Construction of the sidewalk at bituminous
driveways will consist of removing the existing driveway material
and replacing with a 6 inch concrete sidewalk section over 4 inches
of aggregate base; concrete driveways will remain inplace. The
boulevard style sidewalk will consist of a 4 foot wide sidewalk as
the back -of -curb sidewalk will consist of a 5 foot wide sidewalk.
See attached sketch.
Feasibility Study
Cornelia Elementary Sidewalks
June 1, 1999
Page 7
MAVELI...E DR
1 7
INSTALL PEV.RARP,
- ..................
7200 7201
Due to the 15 foot wide boulevard that exists along Cornelia Drive,
West 72nd Street, and Mavelle Drive very few trees or bushes will
be directly impacted with the installation of sidewalks. The right -of-
way along Mavelle from Heatherton Trail to Sandell Avenue does
contain some trees therefore the sidewalk will be place at the back -
of -curb.
7200
cuw /2UU 7201 'uu \ 7201
I '
CORNELIA ELEMENTARY SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS
RIGHT -OF -WAY: Adequate right -of -way exists.
FEASIBILITY: Due to the increasing amount of vehicle trips per day through out
this neighborhood and at the request of the Cornelia Site Council a
sidewalk to separate vehicles and pedestrians would be
recommended. This project is also feasible from an engineering
standpoint.
Feasibility Study
Cornelia Elementary Sidewalks
June 1,1999
Page 8
EASEMENTS: No additional easements will be required.
COMPLETION:
ASSESSMENTS:
7000
7200
TAI
ae
212
ae
1999 Construction Season (August- October)
A special assessment of approximately $350 per assessable lot
will be levied against the residents within the area shown on the
map below.
701 700 to 70, 700° 7001.0
� < a
W
H "10
otal Pro e t Cost: $67,000
§dkpol o $16,750
$16,750
S 33.500
lot of unit)
Wy
Q
UZQAI 7
y
Q
W
LL
PROJECT COSTS: The total estimated project cost is $67,000. The estimated
project cost includes indirect costs of 22.5 %, which includes
engineering, clerical, and finance costs. Funding for the entire
project will be distributed 25% from the School District, 25% from
the City of Edina, and 50% from special assessments. The cost
summary for this project is shown below.
Feasibility Study
Cornelia Elementary Sidewalks
June 1, 1999
Page 9
Subtotal Construction Cost: Schedule A - $ 25,000
Cornelia Dr & Mavelle Dr
Subtotal Construction Cost: Schedule B - $ 24,000
72nd St W
Subtotal Construction Cost $ 49,000
10% Contingency $ 5,000
Total Construction Cost $ 54,000
15% Engineering & Clerical $ 8,000
Total Construction Cost $ 62,000
7.5% Finance $ 5,000
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST $ 67,000
PROJECT SCHEDULE: The following schedule is feasible from an Engineering standpoint
only if Council orders this project:
Council Orders Public Hearing .... ............................May 3, 1999
Receive Feasibility Report ....... ...........................June 1, 1999
Public Hearing .......................... ...........................June 1, 1999
Bid Opening ............................... ..........................July, 1999
Award Contract ............................ ..........................July, 1999
Begin Construction* .................. .....................September, 1999
Complete Construction .............. ......................November, 1999
Monday, May 24, 1999
Wayne Houle
City of Edina
4801 W 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Wayne:
I had thought that it would be a great idea to have sidewalks on 72 d, Cornelia Drive and Mavelle Drive. Often I
walk my dog in the area, and have to confess if you want to witness Road Rage, be there during the time frame that
the Mother's in their SW's are dropping off or picking up their children at Cornelia Elementary School. Frankly
I think the Police Department could make A Training Video on Road Rage.
A sidewalk is useless in these areas because the problems are the intersections; these Mother's in SUV's have no
respect for anyone but their own selves as well as their own children.
I was under the impression that a law had been passed where the pedestrian had the right of way in Minnesota as
in California. I think a few warning citations by the Police Dept would make the need for sidewalks unnecessary.
Possibly the Mothers against Dnmken Drivers could expand their mission.
I think a white line on 72nd for walkers on the North Side so the sun helps melt the snow with a warning that
beware of the Mother's in the SUV's during certain hours would be a satisfactory cost effective solution.
Sincerely,
Name withheld for fear of retaliation from the SW's Mother's
��a71999
I;
li
0�
-Z
254-�
Ila-
A Jr:
ti
I
o _
do
May 14, 1999
Mr. Wayne D. Houle, P.E.
Assistant City Engineer
4801 West 50`h Street
Edina, MN 55424 -1394
Dear Wayne,
It was a pleasure meeting you at Cornelia School on Wednesday evening. I will
put my comments in written form and I would like to speak on this topic at the
June Ist, Council meeting.
There are many reasons why we need sidewalks in this area, but the main reasons
are traffic and children. Everyone is at greater risk, but the children are the
pnmary concern.
I am a little disappointed that the residents had to follow the "routine" and initiate
a petition. This is a city problem the has resulted from the massive commercial
development by France Avenue. Galleria, Leisure Lane, Yorktown, Byerly's and
now Centennial Lakes are the responsibility of the city and the city should have
corrected this problem years ago.
The sidewalks must be constructed for the safety of the children, but the residents
of Cornelia did not create this problem, nor should they pay for it. This also
includes the school as they did not create the problem either.
Furthermore, if sidewalks are only constructed on one side of 72 °d and Mavelle, it
will encourage the children to cross those busy streets. This will be a greater
hazard then we have now. Writing speeding tickets will only slow people down
for a few days.
The sidewalks are needed because of decisions made by the City Council. I am
not complaining about these decisions, because the shopping areas that I
previously mentioned are positive for all Edina. You (the City of Edina) created
this situation, therefore they should pay for it. The sidewalks are not amenities
for the residents of Cornelia or for the school.
Sincerely,
kq
Robert Rofi al
7125 Bristol blvd.
Edina, MN 55435
612 - 927 -8594
7016 Bristol Blvd.
Edina, MN 55435
Tele. # 927 -7907
May 24, 1999
Wayne D. Houle
Assistant City Engineer
Edina City Hall
4801 West 5& Street
Edina, MN 55424
RE: Cornelia Elementary Neighborhood Sidewalk Improvements
Dear Wayne;
Please replace our letter to you dated May 8h, with this letter, because of the changed plan presented, at
Corneilia School, May lfh.
1. It is very hard to clean the sidewalks because of the current snow -plow methods. Hardpaked snow
will be thrown on the sidewalk several times a day, from the street snowplows. This is our current
experience with our driveway. We don't believe the objective of getting the children off the streets
will be met if the sidewalks are not cleaned.
2. The limited addition of sidewalks, instead of full inclusion, tends to pit neighbor against neighbor.
This was seen in the informational meeting on May e.
.3. Why isn't the City of Edina paying for the sidewalks? The city approved the businesses adjacent to
our neighborhood, thus forcing more traffic through our neighborhood, which has caused the
School Safety Committee to place the petition to add the sidewalks. Shouldn't the City proactively
plan for traffic management through the approval process of adding new businesses to the area?
We personally favor neighborhood sidewalks, but before the building of homes on.the property not
after.
Yo
Richard Stem, Marianne Rother v
1•
Jci•
1' 1 .
MAY -17 =1999 15.03 ALLIANT TECHSYSTEMS
Wwywo, cc " -VIAI(
r _ e.%&- U3SO
Post4C Fsx Note 7671
4 2-14P M �►�te r-
i pa ' {
s1JG 4
612 931 5294 P.01i01
V,
s $
in r. ^ Phone 0 M-43+?— It
am 3
r r
17
-35o
A
AA
i I_ I
f�ly��s
t0�oPU
w o...
e-
s+— r'', V%o lcA4
'L'L
b sz
TOTAL P.01
Bucknam Associates
FINANCIAL ADMINISTRATORS
May 13, 1999
Dear Mr. Houle:
I am going to try to summarize concerns expressed last evening.
There seemed to be little debate with the $350/lot assessment
as long as the assessment is fair to all
No one would disagree that child safety is paramount
I did my own small survey this morning. The area of Cornelia at Mavelle
was jammed with cars dropping children off. School buses were in the
mix as well. I saw 4 children — 2 pairs of 2 — walking along the south side
of Mavelle to school.. On 72 °d Street this morning, I saw 2 boys walking
along the south side enroute to Cornelia — both of them live on the SE comer
of 72nd and Gloucester Drive. In short, it appears that many children don't walk
to school at all. (Local a.m. weather — cloudy, but no rain.)
I doubt that a sidewalk on 72 °d Street is even necessary. If it is decreed that
a sidewalk is necessary, certainly the south side would make the most sense
based on traffic patterns.
It seems as if a south side sidewalk on Mavelle might make sense although no
sidewalk will address the issue of the wide place in the road where Mavelle
and Heatherton Trail kind of blend together.. It is difficult to see approaching
traffic and even after it is spotted, difficult for both drivers and pedestrians
to know in which direction it will go.
Children do not attend Cornelia in the summertime and, at least in the winter
months, the existing sidewalks — along the west side of Cornelia Drive and
on the south side of the playground -park area are often impassable. Either they are
snow bound or covered with glare ice — in short the maintenance is poor. I am
sure that part of the reason is the frequent plowing trips along Cornelia
that keep the sidewalk.buried in snow — how often can a sidewalk plow
be expected to appear? One assumes that it will be difficult to keep new sidewalks
clear as_well — plows tear up and down 72nd frequently tossing snow, slush, sand fully 20 ft
into yards,! -
(612) 920 -5799
7136 GLOUCESTER AVENUE FAX (612) 920 -9078
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55435 -4112 SBUCKNAM ®AOL.COM
The issue raised by a resident of Cornelia Drive as to the lack of assessment for
residents of the Cornelia Drive extension and Gloucester Drive seems valid.
If Cornelia Ave residents were assessed for the Cornelia Drive sidewalk — which
appears to be of no particular benefit to them — then, if they are to be assessed
again, the residents of the other two areas should be assessed as well .
I `d like thorough review of this proposal before spending community resources
on yet another layer of concrete.
Thanks for listening.
Since ,
usan Bucknam
May- ,17 -99 08:40A
TO: Wayne Houle
A.5 sINLant: City Engineer
FROM: Roger & Pat Harmon
DATE: May 1.7, 1999
SUBJECT: Cornelia Elementary Neighborhood Sidewalk Tmpr.ovements
Thank you for your informational meeting last Wednesday.
Here are some points'we want to be considered when making
your final decision:
1 ] '111ie: following addresses should be included in the
assessment area:
91ouchester Dr -- 7201, 7205, 7207 -09, 7200,
7204 R 7208
Cornelia Dr -- 7201, 7205 & 7209
2] A survey should be made of this area t.o see where the
majority of the children live. Most of the children who
live North of 72nd Street and walk to Cornelia School go
along Movelle.
31 Consideration shou'1 d he g1 vein to locating the 72nd St.
sidewalk along the South side of the Street. ERpecially if
the survey shows a number of Cornelia students com=ing from
South of 72nd St.
4] Plowing of thesc si.dewa1ks should be the City's
responsibility, not the residents.
Roger Harmon
Nat Harmon
7129 Cornelia Dr
926 -9500
P.O1
612 - 623 -6613
May 12, 1999
VIA Facsimile
Wayne D. Houle, PE
Assistant City Manager
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55423 -1394
150 P02 MAY 12 199 12:13
Scott A. Waychoff
7117 Heatherton Trail
Edina, MN 55435
(612) 929 -3954
Work 623 -6603
Re: Cornelia Elementary Sidewalk Improvements
Dear Wayne,
This letter is in ' response to your invitation to attend a community meeting
today regarding sidewalks for our neighborhood. Unfortunately, a business
meeting will not allow me to attend tonight. I did want to voice some
comments.
I applaud the City's efforts to improve the living environment of our
neighborhood. Sidewalks will be a welcome addition on a limited basis.
I concur with your assessment that sidewalks are needed on 72nd Street to
connect with those on Cornelia Drive and beyond. The traffic is heavy, the
drivers exceed the speed limit nearly all of the time and it can be dangerous
to walk along the side of the street - at all hours of the day, or evening.
My concern is with the proposal to place sidewalks on Mavelle Drive. This
area is, not a heavily traveled section of our neighborhood. We do not have a
large amount of east /west traffic on the street nor do we have a heavy
concentration of north /south traffic converging onto to Mavelle Drive. I
assume that some mothers have argued that their children are at risk in
walking on this street to and from Cornelia School. I don't believe it.
Houle
612 - 623 -6613
Page 2
150 P03 MAY 12 '99 1213 •.
The number of small children in the area is not growing at a rapid pace, if at
all. The street is wide enough to allow for safe passage of cars and children
without causing accidents. And finally, the addition of sidewalks is not in
keeping with the look and feel of the neighborhood. We don't have or need
sidewalks on all of the surrounding streets so why Movelle Drive?
I am not against progress and am willing to pay for it if it is appropriate. In
this case I do not feel that the entire package is warranted. I support 72W
Street but am opposed to sidewalks on Movelle Drive.
Please voice my concerns and comments to those in attendance and to the
powers that be afCity Hall on this issue. Thank you for your fine service to
our communityl
Best regards,
Scott A. Waychof f
�
----'-------------------'--------
lel
cf-
�
----'-------------------'--------
lel
May 19, 1999
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT - PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT NO. S -077
CORNELIA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL NEIGHBORHOOD:
CORNELIA D
7
ST 72 STR
City of Edina
The Edina City Council will meet at the Edina City Hall, on Tuesday, June 1, 1999 at 7:00 PM, to consider the
Public Hearing on the construction of sidewalks along Cornelia Drive from ' /z block south of West 70th Street to
Mavelle Drive, Mavelle Drive from Cornelia Drive to Lynmar Lane, West 72 "d Street from Cornelia Drive to
Lynmar Lane. This hearing is being conducted under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter
429.
This hearing has been called as a result of a etp ition from the Cornelia Elementary Site Council. The estimated
project cost is $67,000. The cost of the project will be funded by special assessment. The estimated cost per
assessable lot is $350 and could be divided over a ten year period with interest accumulating on the unpaid
balance. Under current City policy, maintenance (snow removal) of the sidewalk will be the responsibility of
the homeowner.
The sidewalk is proposed to be four to five feet wide and constructed of concrete. The alignment will be
adjacent to right -of -way line and will vary slightly to protect existing property features to the greatest extent
possible. The proposed project would be constructed in 1999, with the assessment hearing occurring in late
September or early October. A survey postcard is enclosed regarding the alignment of the West 72nd
Street sidewalk; please return this survey by Wednesday, May 26, 1999. This survey was initiated from
the Informational Meeting held on May 12, at Cornelia Elementary School. Issues raised at this meeting will
presented to the council at the Public Hearing.
The area proposed to be assessed the cost of the proposed improvement includes:
Lots 3 thru 6, Blk 2, Lots 2 thru 9, Blk 3, Lots 2 thru 8, Blk 4, Lots 1 thru 9, Blk 5, Lots 1 thru 16, Blk 6 and Lots
1 thru 6, Blk 7, Stow's Edgemoor Addition; Lots 31 thru 39 and 41 thru 43, Blk 1, Oscar Roberts First Addition;
Units'! & 2, Condominium No. 375, Bristol Circle Condominiums; Lots 1 thru 5, Blk 1, Lots 1 thru 10, Blk 2 and
Lots 1 thru 20, Blk 3, Stow's Delaney Addition; and Lot 5, Blk 1, Stow's Delaney Addition McCoy Replat;
Unplatted 31- 028 -24, That part of the N 1060 ft of the W 25 acres of NW' /4 of NE % lying E of W 210 ft thereof
ex road.
Your receipt of this notice is an indication that property whose ownership is listed to you is among those
properties that are considered to be benefited by the improvement.
Any inquiries, comments and /or suggestions you may have regarding this improvement may be forwarded to
the City Council or Engineering Department prior to the hearing or presented at the hearing itself. If you desire
additional information, please call Wayne Houle at 826 -0443 between 8:00 AM and 4:30 PM, Monday through
Friday.
The City Council can authorize the proposed project immediately upon the close of the hearing.
Thank you,
r ncis J. H , P.E.
Director of Public Works and City Engineer
City Hall (612) 927 -8861
4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 826 -0390
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 826 -0379
Agreement of and Waiver of Irregularity and Appeal
THIS AGREEMENT, is made this 25th day of May, 1999, between the
City of Edina, State of. Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the City and
Independent School District No. 273 of Hennepin County, State of Minnesota,
hereinafter referred to as Owner.
In consideration of the action of the City Council, to cause the construction of
sidewalk on Cornelia Drive, Mavelle Drive and W. 72nd Street. Owner expressly
waives objection to length of time of advertising with regard to the said improvement
Public Hearing notice - SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS CORNELIA ELEMENTARY
STREET IMPROVEMENT S -077, tog r with all rights to appeal in the courts.
In testimony, whereof has hereunto set his
hand, the day and year first ai a r en.
In presence of:
Subscribed and sworn tb before me the 25th day of May 1999.
o ary Pu is
JANE M. TIMM
NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA
HENNEPIN COUNTY
My Commission Expires Jan. 31, 2000
o e INFORMATIONAL MEETING
° CORNELIA ELEMENTARY NEIGHBORHOOD
SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS
AGENDA
1. PURPOSE OF TONIGHTS MEETING
• FACT FINDING - GATHERING PROCESS
NEIGHBORHOOD INPUTS:
:Z USE POST -IT NOTES AND PLACE ON MAPS
:Z WRITE DOWN ON LEGAL PAD TONIGHT
:) TELL ME
�D CALL ME
�D WRITE TOME
�Z SPEAK AT PUBLIC HEARING
2. PETITION PROCESS
3. PROJECT
• HISTORY - CORNELIA SITE SAFETY COUNCIL - DIANE MARTENS
• PROJECT
• SCHEDULE
• ASSESSMENTS
4. NEXT STEP - PUBLIC HEARING: JUNE 1
5. QUESTIONS
4g1NA
�1
Cn
N„J .b0
INFORMATIONAL SHEET
CORNELIA ELEMENTARY NEIGHBORHOOD
SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS
CITY OF EDINA
PROJECT: This project was initiated by a petitioned circulated by Cornelia Elementary School. The
proposed project will consist of constructing sidewalks along the westerly side of Cornelia Drive at the
school entrance, along the southerly side of Mavelle Drive, and along the northerly side of West 72nd
Street. The majority of the sidewalks will be 4 foot wide boulevard sidewalks; meaning that a four to five
foot grass boulevard will exist between the sidewalk and the street.
SCHEDULE: The construction for this project should take approximately three to eight weeks depending
on the weather.
The proposed preliminary schedule is as follows:
Informational Meeting ......... May 12, 1999
Public Hearing ....................June 1, 1999
Begin Construction ....... July / August, 1999
Complete Construction ...... August / September, 1999
Final Assessment Hearing ......... Fall of 1999 or 2000
Please keep in mind that this project is "proposed only" until the City Council orders it at a Public Hearing.
Also, you will be notified of the public hearing date at least ten days prior to the public hearing.
ASSESSMENTS: The assessments for this project are preliminarily setup on a per lot basis, meaning all
lots will be assessed equally. Assessments are typically added to the tax roll after the final assessment
hearing and can be spread -out over 10 years. Proposed Assessments for this project are ±$350 per lot.
NEIGHBORHOOD INPUT OPPORTUNITIES: Residents from this neighborhood will have opportunities
for input at both the informational meeting and the public hearing, or you can call Wayne Houle at 826-
0443.
NOTES:
to
w
Q
UN 7.
U
z
g
DR 72ND ST W
w
7201 7200 �, 7201 7200 f7 "v1
7200 7201 7200 lL�
72Qy C�iQ i�^iI3 -115
7204 7205 7�4 7205. 7200 w
7205 7204 w
721T6-0 , Q
"..,6 7207 -09 T2u7 -4$
2208 7209 7208 7207 -09 7209 7a' tT -t2 w
U
z
7213 J -
7212 7211 -13 lt_ 7
212 PROPOSED S DEWALKS
7217 7216 7250
216 Vf L E DRIVE & W ST 72nd STREET
7n1 7220
I
7001
7001
7000 7001 -03
g
390!
w
4301 4221 4217 4213 4209 4201
7000
7112'
G
v
Q
7000 J
J
�
7121
7905
70J4
11)06
7006'07
p
7004
-
z
Q —
7010
1009
rn58
roa@
7QO6 7009 -11
otal Pro e t Cost: $67 ,1000
7101
4215 4212 420® 4204 4200
YM3
70ka
7012 7016
S ® ®I O�8 $169750
7017
-��
R
7124
701U
City C st ��
y O $169750
7000
7101 7100 < 7109
7or�
7017
rat€
79ZS
4000
O
m
x7,00
Spec i ssessme is $33395®®
.7105 71x4 7105
—
7102
T101
7400
7101
4001
n
71x8 .7109
7105
?'429
7120.
m
PROPA ASSESSME T ARE 71
....
O
7110
7101
7105
7104
(Approxim tely $350,pe� lot o unit)
z
T,13 7,1i
n
D"
7109
m
D
aloe
tlua
4tOPOSE SIDEWALK(
0
7117 7117 -
_.
.{
HAZELTON RD
to
w
Q
UN 7.
U
z
g
DR 72ND ST W
w
7201 7200 �, 7201 7200 f7 "v1
7200 7201 7200 lL�
72Qy C�iQ i�^iI3 -115
7204 7205 7�4 7205. 7200 w
7205 7204 w
721T6-0 , Q
"..,6 7207 -09 T2u7 -4$
2208 7209 7208 7207 -09 7209 7a' tT -t2 w
U
z
7213 J -
7212 7211 -13 lt_ 7
212 PROPOSED S DEWALKS
7217 7216 7250
216 Vf L E DRIVE & W ST 72nd STREET
7n1 7220
I
. 7112
7111
7112'
7121 :;,
4.7120
7121
- -._
._„
..
7125 -
�. 7118
T11T..
7116
'ff25
7124
O
J
7129
7128;
C
?'429
7120.
m
7129 .,
7120
Cl)
7 +2?
7124
n
D"
_.
.{
m
)
".7.133
7124
7125
7124
74•25
7124
71,33
7132
M
m
O
142
z
7137
7 ?56
7137
7128
7120
7128
7129
7128
to
w
Q
UN 7.
U
z
g
DR 72ND ST W
w
7201 7200 �, 7201 7200 f7 "v1
7200 7201 7200 lL�
72Qy C�iQ i�^iI3 -115
7204 7205 7�4 7205. 7200 w
7205 7204 w
721T6-0 , Q
"..,6 7207 -09 T2u7 -4$
2208 7209 7208 7207 -09 7209 7a' tT -t2 w
U
z
7213 J -
7212 7211 -13 lt_ 7
212 PROPOSED S DEWALKS
7217 7216 7250
216 Vf L E DRIVE & W ST 72nd STREET
7n1 7220
I
City of Edina
l
May 6, 1999
Cornelia Elementary Neighborhood Sidewalk Improvements
Edina, MN
Re: Resident Letter No. 1
Informational Meeting Announcement
Cornelia Elementary Neighborhood Sidewalk Improvements
Dear Resident:
The City of Edina received a petition from the Cornelia Elementary Neighborhood for sidewalk
installation on the following streets: Cornelia Drive (in front of school), Mavelle Drive (from
Cornelia Drive to Lynmar Lane), and 72nd Street West (from Cornelia Drive to Lynmar Lane).
See attached map for locations. The, City of Edina is hosting an Informational Meeting
regarding this project to be held on Wednesday, May 12, 1999 at Cornelia School, 7000
Cornelia Drive, in the cafeteria, at 7:00 PM.
The meeting format will consist of a short presentation followed by an informal question and
answer session. The presentation will cover scope of work and average assessment costs. If
you cannot attend this meeting please contact me at 826 -0443 and I will answer any questions .
you may have.
Sincerely,
Wayne D:. Houle, PE
Assistant City Engineer
Attachment
c: File
City Hall (612) 927 -8861
4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 826 -0390
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 826 -0379
d •.,s
4
.4�
� '9iN�1'rry�
oe
0
R FPORT/RECOMMENDATION
To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
Agenda Item VII.B.
From: DEBRA MANGEN
Consent
CLERK
Information Only ❑
Date: OCTOBER 199 1998
Mgr. Recommends ❑
To HRA
®
To Council
Subject: PETITION RECEIVED
❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
RECOMMENDATION:
Refer petition received to Engineering for processing as to feasibility.
INFO/BACKGROUND:
The attached petition was received October 16, 1998, from the Cornelia Site
Council requesting sidewalks at:
1. West 72 "d Street - Lynmar Lane to Cornelia Drive
2. Cornelia Drive - West 70d' Street to the south parking lot of Cornelia
Elementary School
3. Cornelia Drive - West 70d' Street to West 66`h Street
4. Mavelle Drive - Cornelia Drive to Lynmar Lane
Cornelia Elementary School Zone Road Volumes
West 72nd Street:
Cornelia Drive :
Cornelia Drive :
Oaklawn Ave
West Shore Dr. :
West Shore Dr. :
Lynmar Lane to Cornelia Drive
72nd Street to 701h Street
70th Street to 66th Street
72nd Street to Gilford Drive
701h Street to 66th Street
Gilford Drive to 70th Street
Volume
2,386
2,383
1,168
1,100
1,000
900
Dunberry Lane Cornelia Dr. to W. Shore Dr. 802
Gilford Drive Oaklawn Ave. to W. Shore Dr. 800
Mavelle Drive Cornelia Dr. to Lynmar Lane ?
s�
A.9
w•
S
�1
r
l�v v
ooRPogx
1888
The City Council
City of Edina
Petition
Petition Instructions
This petition form is to be used to ask the Edina City Council to consider. the
following types of improvements:
SIDEWALK
ALLEY PAVING
WATER MAIN
STORM SEWER
PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER
CURB AND GUTTER ONLY
(WITHOUT PERMANENT STREET SURFACING)
SANITARY SEWER
STREET LIGHTING
or another improvement you describe (called OTHER on this form).
You may use another petition form if you wish but the city council may reject such
petitions unless they contain the following information:
1. Type of improvement(s) requested, e.g., SIDEWALK, STORM
SEWER, WATER MAIN, etc.
2. Precise location(s) of the requested improvements
3. A statement that all who sign the petition understand that the city
council may assess the costs of these improvements against the proper-
ties benefiting from the improvements in amounts determined by the
council
4. Printed name of property owner, owner's signature and phone num-
ber, and property address
5. Signature of person circulating the petition
If you have questions, please call the City Clerk at 927 -8861 between 8:OOAM
and 4:30PM.
DEBRA MANGEN
CITY CLERK
i e City of Edina, Minnesota
th CITY COUNCIL
a� 48o1 West Soth Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424
(612) 927 -8861 • (612) 927 - 7645 -FAX • (612) 927 - 5461 -TDD
PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL
® SIDEWALK
❑ STORM SEWER
❑ ALLEY PAVING
❑ SANITARY SEWER
❑ CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ❑ PERMANENT STREET
SURFACING WITH
CURB AND GUTTER
lo/ 1 UM
DATE:
10/7/98
❑ WATERMAIN
❑ STREET LIGHTING
❑ OTHER:
To the Mayor and City Council:
The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to
the locations listed below.
West 72nd Street between Lvnmar Lane and CnrnP1 ; n nr; ve
LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME
ADDRESS ADDRESS
Cornelia Drive between 72nd Street and 70th Street
ADDRESS ADDRESS
':ATION OF IMyROVEMENT BY STREET NAME
jrnelia Drive between 70th Street and �� }'' }'' °R
LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME
ADDRESS ADDRESS
Mavelle Drive between Cornelia Drive and Lvnmar Lane
DRESS ADDRESS
LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NA
AD
ME
IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SO ��IlVIPROVEMEUNDERSTAND S AINSTT THE
THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS
PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN STATUTES.
DETERMINED BY THE
COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429,
V `SN
(: iT L ell.
CORNF.la to S
OWNER'S NAME
(PRINTED)
1 i
i
/J
PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNER'S
PHONE
. O ;
r
j
r
.is petition was circulated by:
Cornelia Elementary School 7000 Cornelia Drive 928 -2780
ADDRESS PHONE
NAME
There is space for more signatures on the back or you may attach extra pages. S87MVBM 19M
rROl'j9R -n OWN R-'S OWNER'S NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNER'S
SIGH (PRINTED) PHONE
A A, �u1t �► ��i 5� E 7 1 2, C`)1c�n �t9e 83� -95$G
L'�7�i- v� /..c1 � /`7-e �� Si �0�3 2 W 5 tiw r e 1J-r• G/ZG" C�� S
rOSM HOME ¢505 A- doyer R�6-57//
y�
A AAM
rwilw (F
�h:► �1h�tr Ni7�i N�I���z,j ��L�ho�a� 9a� -a��,� �
He-e-
` l;rr•ne /]11a.r�"ev�s �1r2 /5rj',)4-r! li 9s7 -9id'3
6o-'taPo,,L2- 9 -1 s -97a/
Petition to the City Council
To the Mayor,, City Council, and Edina School District:
The Cornelia Site Council and Cornelia Safety Committee ,members
ask the City Council and.-Edina School District to consider the
installation of sidewalks ai the locations listed below. We request
these sidewalks to provide a safe pedestrian environment for children
classified as' walkers by the Edina School District. Funding for the
proposed sidewalks to be allocated in accordance with the
September 1998 sidewalk financing policy. The category of Public
School Zone allocates the cost as follows: 25% City, 25% School
District, and we request the remaining 50% as a special assessment
to the local area. A map showing the locations is attached.
Sidewalk Locations
*West 72nd Street: Lynmar Lane to. Cornelia Drive. Volume 2,386.
*Cornelia Drive:
*Cornelia Drive:
*Mavelle Drive:
West 701h Street to the south parking lot of
Cornelia Elementary School. Volume 2,383.
West 70th Street to West 66th Street. Volume
1,168.
Cornelia Drive to Lynmar Lane.
CIR
�6�NI► her
1, OR ui
9ALFANZ
-� LA �O
O
OUNSERR Y
LA
F N 70TH
vs
FCD(27
SOUTHDALE
SHOPPING
CENTER
RICHFIELD SCHOOL t
rf A SCHOOL 0
N 69TH ST
41kvv 1 GALLERIA
Q_ - -
7 j�ro�cs�c1
NOOVEP A. m ��
- y F�.tf'Ccre
8EL V I DRE o HAZEL TON RD
cc
ST
CC
Ci
cx_-
0
c
v W
.
in G I LFORD OR
k J t
lu J
(2 1)
N ! B I SOUS ..A VE �:: PARKLAMN
cb -
�JN 76TH `ST
!]USE
I EM
?L �
�T C.
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
TO: Mayor & City Council
From: Francis J. Hoffmaw
City Engineer
Date: June 1, 1999
Subject: Receive Feasibility and
Public Hearing: Countryside
Elementary School
Neighborhood Sidewalk
Improvement S -076
Recommendation:
Agenda Item #
Consent
Information Only
Mgr. Recommends
Action
II.E.
❑ To H RA
® To Council
® Motion
® Resolution
❑ Ordinance
❑ Discussion
If the Council determines the project to be warranted and necessary, Council shall adopt a
resolution approving Countryside Elementary School Neighborhood Sidewalk Improvement S-
076, authorize plans and specifications to be completed and bids taken.
Info /Background:
The City has received a petition from 40 neighborhood residents to construct concrete
sidewalks along Stuart Avenue from Benton Avenue to Grove Street. Staff is also proposing an
extension of this sidewalk along Grove Street from Stuart Avenue to Arbour Avenue.
Staff analyzed the project and feels that the project is feasible from an engineering standpoint.
Attached is a copy of the Feasibility Study along with Notice of Public Hearing to this report, and
all resident letters received.
The estimated project cost is $27,000. Funding for this project would be from a special
assessment of approximately $200 per assessable lot based on an area assessment (see Page
6 of Feasibility Report).
As part of the Site Council discussions with the City, City staff and Countryside School staff
have reviewed the inclusion of a parking bay on Tracy Avenue to improve safety conditions at
Countryside School. The proposed parking bay cost would be $28,000 and would be funded by
Municipal State Aid funds. Staff would. recommend the additional change if the sidewalks are
approved.
ok a
co
�0 FEASIBILITY STUDY
'����• CITY OF EDINA
COUNTRYSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL NEIGHBORHOOD
SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS S -076
June 1, 1999
LOCATION: Stuart Avenue from Countryside Elementary School to Grove
Street and Grove Street from Stuart Avenue to Arbour Avenue.
Bqy •1N 5{p9 sae Sbz S o +Va F:.9 \.r16 GROVE .
saw
GROVE ST
a
)]U9 si95 991 % 'EU 5ry �:5 xol :81] )
3 RJ9 STlO 0]+2 5N9 `�0
Se.T
GROVE ST �9a
xn >,un
AM xro9
5000 '.de] 5"1 !%�: 51+. ':N: •:AI 5]0
B9t1 5M1 b�J
Y OR
'ATe j
'.v95 Q
J P :4C! SLI 11] 501 ^. J
Y1.h
Blbb sam � yg2t
Srt Q � I 5]1] T !A1 9O9 j
6 +8 Q
M19B o91 !811 N
yiz BENTON AVE
xc. Ale O 0 BENTON AVE
u9 SME
Q
3]I! a -u
519 k++
!S'IINTFYSCY [lCU[N'Ri
4_K PROPOSED SID
Countryside School Proposed
Sidewalk Improvements
INITIATION & ISSUES: This project was initiated by a petition from forty residents within
the Countryside Elementary Neighborhood. The petition requests
the City to consider sidewalk improvements along Stuart Avenue.
Engineering Staff met with the Countryside Elementary School
Principal and members of the Countryside Site Council last fall
regarding the layout of sidewalks within the Countryside
Elementary School's walking area. The Site Council was
concerned with students walking to school from the northwest and
also the amount of traffic that is generated by parents dropping
and picking up their children. Most parents were using either
Stuart Avenue or Benton Avenue for their route to and from the
school. The school has since set up drop -offs and pick -ups along
Arbour Avenue at Sun Road.
The Countryside Elementary Site Council through the Principal of
Countryside submitted a proposed sidewalk layout for this
neighborhood for the proposed Edina Transportation Plan as part
of the City's Comprehensive Plan update. This neighborhood
included the sidewalks as shown below.
Feasibility Study
Countryside Elementary Sidewalks
June .1, 1999
Page 2
................. Ci:;NCfi V. I'E
`�I DI.. WA I,.K
IDE
RY
[XiS?ING
BI RIMINCWS
PRI:iPOSi::D
SID[:WALI <_
PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN /BICYCLE FACILITIES
Staff held a neighborhood informational meeting on May 19. Ten
residents from the neighborhood attended this meeting. Some of
the issues these residents had regarding the proposed sidewalks
are as follows:
1. The sidewalk along Stuart Avenue is definitely wanted.
2. Many residents felt the sidewalk along Grove Street
should be located on the northerly side.
3. There are other traffic issues in the neighborhood such
as speeding, people rolling through and not stopping for
stop signs.
4. Site lines along Grove Street both from east and west
are obstructed with vegetation and both horizontal and
vertical curves of the roadway..
5. The proposed sidewalks should be extended to Olinger
Road to provide a safe passage to Bredesen Park.
6. Resident maintenance of the sidewalk such as snow
removal.
7. The originally proposed back -of -curb sidewalk along
Stuart Avenue should be a boulevard type sidewalk.
All resident letters received by staff are included with this report.
EXISTING CONDITIONS: Stuart Avenue and Grove Street streetscapes consists of a 30 foot
wide bituminous roadways flanked with curb and gutter on both
sides. Right -of -ways for Stuart Avenue and Grove Street are 60
and 40 feet respectively. The westerly side of Stuart Avenue
contains minimal trees planted within City right -of -way. The most
northerly lot, 5800 Stuart Avenue, has two large pines within the
boulevard . area. The two southerly lots, 5812 and 5816 Stuart
Avenue contains many smaller bushes within the boulevard area.
The topography of the streetscape is fairly level at the southerly
Feasibility Study
Countryside Elementary Sidewalks
June 1, 1999
Page 3
end with the northerly end experiencing grade changes from the
street to the property lines.
Streetscape of Stuart Avenue
Streetscape of Grove Street at Arbour Avenue
Grove Street and Stuart Avenue serves as a northwesterly access
to Countryside Elementary School. Grove Street also serves as
one of many routes to Bredesen Park located off Olinger Road and
Olinger Boulevard. Traffic counts for these two streets were taken
during the school year and are shown below. The numbers of
potential students that might utilize these sidewalks are also
shown below.
Feasibility Study
Countryside Elementary Sidewalks
June 1, 1999
Page 4
PROPOSEDASS
(Approximately
PROPOSED SIDI
EEoeo nor AVERAGE DA
TAKEN DURI
0
14 POTENTIAL NUMBER OF STUDENTS
BEYOND THIS POINT
Enloe
MINIM
NMIME
Countryside School idewa
Proposed Assessment Area
IMPROVEMENT: Construct sidewalks along Stuart Avenue and Grove Street. A
boulevard sidewalk is proposed along Stuart Avenue due to the
input of the residents along this street. The sidewalk would be
located along the westerly side of Stuart Avenue within the
roadway right -of -way along the front property lines. The sidewalk
along Grove Street would be on the southerly side of the roadway
within roadway right -of -way along the existing back -of -curb. Staff
proposed the addition of this sidewalk to provide an off - street route
for pedestrians through this area. This also provides another link
as per the proposed pedestrian /bicycle plan. A sidewalk
constructed along the northerly side of Grove Street between
Stuart Avenue and Wycliff Road is not feasible due to the steep
grade of the property and the lack of right -of -way at this location.
Construction of these sidewalks would involve removing 4 -8 inches
of topsoil and replacing with a 4 inch concrete sidewalk over a 4
inch aggregate base. Construction of the sidewalk at bituminous
driveways would consist of removing the existing driveway material
and replacing with a 6 inch concrete sidewalk section over 4 inches
of aggregate base; concrete driveways will remain inplace. The
boulevard style sidewalk along Stuart Avenue will consist of .a 4
Feasibility Study
Countryside Elementary Sidewalks
June 1, 1999
Page 5
foot wide sidewalk as the back -of -curb sidewalk will consist of a 5
foot wide sidewalk. See attached sketch.
Due to the 15 foot wide boulevard that exists along Stuart Avenue
very few trees would be directly impacted with the installation of
sidewalks. However, two large trees located at 5800 Stuart
Avenue will need to be removed for installation of the sidewalk.
The larger Maple tree at 5809 Grove Street is very close to the
proposed sidewalk but will be protected during construction.
INSTALL CURB RAMP
5801
5'
INSTALL CURB RAMP[ I` I IV[
...
a
NARROW SID EWALKOCN
@ MAPLE TREE
INSTALL LANNON
STONE WALL
5800 ? +'
5801
w •
5804 ._.. .. .6
1r
rer
, ..
24 .�\.i.
Ili-
.:,
z • ov
<J..
'
c
5605
�..
5808
Fin p_._._ ... _............ _ ...... ........._...__ —_
cur
r
5716
5812
--
�.,,... _... _. ............. _ _ ............................
4
vRw
R
1.. N A v':-
.........,,, P
nii s
pr
5816
5701
COUNTRYSIDE ELEMENTARY SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS
Feasibility Study
Countryside Elementary Sidewalks
June 1, 1999
Page 6
RIGHT -OF -WAY: Adequate right -of -way exists.
FEASIBILITY: Due to the increasing amount of vehicle trips per day along Grove
Street and the request of the Countryside Site Council a sidewalk
to separate vehicles and pedestrians would be recommended.
This project is also feasible from an engineering standpoint.
EASEMENTS: No additional easements will be required.
COMPLETION: 1999 Construction Season (August- October)
ASSESSMENTS:
A special assessment of approximately $200 per assessable lot
will be levied against the residents within the area shown on the
;s IF
DR
WARDEN AVE
pp. WARDEN AVE
o GROVE ST
OROVE ST °41k
lu4 - V
3OVE ST
Y DR LYLE ACIR
0.ti.
Ld S6, 0 x b
6 00 W
13,400 xv s. y. ,. gENTON AVE
O S �BENTON AVE
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
(Approximately 5200 per I
Proposed Assessment Area
PROJECT COSTS: The total estimated project cost is $27,000. The estimated
project cost includes indirect costs of 22.5 %, which includes
engineering, clerical, and finance costs. Funding for the entire
project will be distributed 25% from the School District, 25% from
the City of Edina, and 50% from special assessments. The cost
summary for this project is shown below.
Feasibility Study
Countryside Elementary Sidewalks
June 1, 1999
Page 7
COST SUMMARY
Subtotal Construction Cost $ 20,000
10% Contingency $ 2,000
Total Construction Cost $ 22,000
15% Engineering & Clerical $ 3,000
Total Construction Cost $ 25,000
7.5% Finance $ 2,000
TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COST $ 27,000
PROJECT SCHEDULE: The following schedule is feasible from an Engineering standpoint
only if Council orders this project:
Council Orders Public Hearing .... ............................May 3, 1999
Receive Feasibility Report ....... ...........................June 1, 1999
Public Hearing .......................... ...........................June 1, 1999
Bid Opening ............................... ..........................July, 1999
Award Contract ............................ ..........................July, 1999
Begin Construction .................. .....................September, 1999
Complete Construction .............. ......................November, 1999
Lynn W. Gallup
5932 Grove Street
Edina, MN 55436
May 20, 1999
Mr. Wayne Houle, PE
City of Edina
Dear Mr. Houle:
First of all, thank you for conducting the informational meeting on May 19th. I was very pleased to
have the opportunity to give my thoughts on the project. My purpose with this letter is to summarize
my comments made at that meeting. These were the major points:
1. I fully support the project as you presented it; that is, having the sidewalk run on the west side of
Stuart Ave. and around the corner heading west on the south side of Grove St. However, I do not
believe it goes quite far enough to adequately achieve the goal of assuring the safety of our children.
2. Referring to the attached drawing showing my suggested sidewalks in blue, there should be a short
piece of sidewalk in front of the church on the north side of Grove St. Based upon my personal
experience of having walked my child to Countryside School every day for four years, I can say that
this piece of sidewalk is needed to provide an off-street cross -walk assembly point at the stop sign for
children coming down Wycliffe or Grove.
3. Stuart Ave. is unquestionably a dangerous street to walk on but Grove Street is nearly as bad. It is a
thru - street, heavily used and often driven too fast. I believe the proposed sidewalk should be extended
on the south side of Grove St. all the way to Olinger Rd. It should not be on the north side of Grove
for the following reasons:
A. The lots on the south side are much flatter. The north side would require some retaining
walls.
B. Running on the north side would introduce the need for a controlled intersection at Merold
Drive and Grove St.
C. The south side has better access to Olinger Rd. because there is a long narrow stretch of
neglected property on Grove between Merold and Olinger having unattractive trees which should be
removed or drastically thinned anyway for better snow melt on Grove St.
D. The south side of Grove is the natural route to school because it results in the least crossings
of the street.
4. Any sidewalk plan should include assessing the properties on Olinger Rd for one block to the north
and south of the Grove St. intersection as these children use the Grove -Stuart route to school too.
5. Similarly, the properties directly across from Countryside School should be assessed because Stuart
Ave. is their natural route to school.
r
Q
COVE ST
Total Project Cost:
School Cost
City Cost
Special Assessments
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT AF
(Approximately $200 per lot)
PROPOSED SIDEWALKS
II kY� %1
t'I���t lty��r �� }�T, �' 1.. �111 yi ��.Ilil'�•�1I 1�� }�'
�� II f i rIF� ,F r! • 1 t4 1,}, tit s{u (r�'•�. �i
��',jt',gv,!'IrT �,a.�i�° ��r� ' y �I i��ln ��l{ •
�j�III 11 r1 td
`it t 11a� �� iii �rll �dl
a( i� 1
1�1111.'T'N"
It(.iil {I Illy I,I w i..( I II',S} (��3
I
1 �,: I� L�1 • L.,. !,. 1�!t I I � ; I I ,t (I �y��f � �I��tt�a(,
r Ih I
113�•zL��..I�Ii11I1I��Jt "r }�'',j:i }vi I} �Il� • .
aII 1 .i } i f I 1' I ,r t I i I'll9 111 I ,�� � ; 1 1u1 �� A � ` ; q It^�e I 1 �' 1''S Ikk�`i'�� �i ���p � � �•j 1 ��• 9
�� 1,1 t�l .'!� :i�',I,.�•t ,: .I. }ij, l! }.. �1 " }!1 ��ri . �1!'Yf`I�,�,��y i1>��,1 ��. ���,
I:I,,,I,k31it �.
,Ni }+
.. • f 1 `?Sz..t 1
Il
..816
1,71 ' I E'
rF•.l t 1` [.i7.. Y Z .. \ 4
1
�.yY � :�.1..
1
E]'''. i
'873 ` +!'3
h1.1
1
f^
IPE Q I
.__..__...__ ._... ..._ °_871
Q
COVE ST
Total Project Cost:
School Cost
City Cost
Special Assessments
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT AF
(Approximately $200 per lot)
PROPOSED SIDEWALKS
II kY� %1
t'I���t lty��r �� }�T, �' 1.. �111 yi ��.Ilil'�•�1I 1�� }�'
�� II f i rIF� ,F r! • 1 t4 1,}, tit s{u (r�'•�. �i
��',jt',gv,!'IrT �,a.�i�° ��r� ' y �I i��ln ��l{ •
�j�III 11 r1 td
`it t 11a� �� iii �rll �dl
a( i� 1
1�1111.'T'N"
It(.iil {I Illy I,I w i..( I II',S} (��3
I
1 �,: I� L�1 • L.,. !,. 1�!t I I � ; I I ,t (I �y��f � �I��tt�a(,
r Ih I
113�•zL��..I�Ii11I1I��Jt "r }�'',j:i }vi I} �Il� • .
aII 1 .i } i f I 1' I ,r t I i I'll9 111 I ,�� � ; 1 1u1 �� A � ` ; q It^�e I 1 �' 1''S Ikk�`i'�� �i ���p � � �•j 1 ��• 9
�� 1,1 t�l .'!� :i�',I,.�•t ,: .I. }ij, l! }.. �1 " }!1 ��ri . �1!'Yf`I�,�,��y i1>��,1 ��. ���,
I:I,,,I,k31it �.
,Ni }+
.. • f 1 `?Sz..t 1
Il
May 26, 1999
City of Edina
4801 W. 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Edina City Council Members,
We are writing to express our opinion about the proposed sidewalk project for Stuart
Avenue and Grove Street. Our lot is one of those directly affected by the proposed
sidewalk. We live at 5809 Grove St. and have watched the traffic patterns evolve in our
neighborhood for the past 15 years.
Last fall, we supported and signed the neighborhood petition proposing a sidewalk for
Stuart Ave. Traffic on Stuart Ave. gets quite congested during the hours children are
going to and from school, creating unsafe conditions, particularly in the winter. We
hope that the Stuart Ave. sidewalk will be built prior to the start of the next school year.
The proposed sidewalk on the south side of Grove St., which was not part of the
neighborhood petition, is ill- advised for safety reasons. A sidewalk will provide children
and parents a reason to cross the street at the intersection of Grove St. and Arbour Ave.
This intersection is not particularly safe and will become less so if a sidewalk is placed
such that children will be crossing Grove St. or Arbour Ave. at that point. A number of
hazards exist at this intersection:
• Traffic from the west on Grove St., comes around a blind curve due to some large
pine trees just prior to the intersection.
• Traffic from the south on Arbour Ave. comes up a hill that precludes drivers from
seeing traffic or pedestrians on Grove St. until entering the intersection.
• Traffic from the east on Grove St. comes over a rise that ends at the east end of our
lot and creates a semi -blind approach to the intersection.
• Grove St. is quite wide at this intersection due to the nature of this three -way
intersection.
• There is no traffic control at this intersection.
We believe the sidewalk would create a false sense of security for pedestrians, while
doing little about the traffic conditions. Traffic control at the intersection of Grove St.
and Arbour Ave. would be safer and less costly than the sidewalk extension.
Another unsafe crossing would be created at Wycliffe Rd. and Grove St. Traffic
proceeding west on Grove St. enters this intersection over a rise that does not allow
drivers to see pedestrians, particularly short elementary school children, until autos are
already upon them.
.. t
Part of the justification for the Grove St. sidewalk is due to the traffic count data taken
on Grove St. This data is partially flawed due to the placement of the traffic count
equipment. The equipment was placed to the east of Good Samaritan Church and thus
picks up traffic that does not necessarily impact the Countryside Elementary issue.
Good Samaritan currently holds two sessions daily of preschool and numerous public
meetings during the day and evening which make the traffic count appear much heavier
than actually exists further west on Grove St. where the sidewalk is proposed.
At the informational meeting on May 190, a revision to the proposed sidewalk on Grove
St. was discussed. This revision would place a sidewalk on the north side of Grove St.
between Stuart Ave and Wycliffe Rd. We believe this revision would provide a safer
alternative for pedestrians in the neighborhood, particularly children on their way to
school. We also believe that the other improvements at the school will greatly help the
traffic and safety issues around Countryside elementary, particularly the new drop -off
zone on Arbour Ave. and the upcoming drop- off /pick -up lane on Tracy Ave.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
1
Kevin J. Lawless and April H. Egan
cc: Wayne D. Houle, PE
Assistant City Engineer
May 27, 1999
Wayne Houle
Edina Engineering Department
I am writing to express my opinion concerning "Sidewalk Improvement -- Proposed Improvement
NO.S -076 ".
I have lived at 5629 Wycliffe Road for over 20 years. My children attended ( walked to ►
Countryside school during the 80's and 90's. They never encountered any problems
to their safety by walking to and from school. I am unaware of a single incident of a child
( or an adult for that matter ) being hit or injured by a car on Wycliffe, Grove or Stuart
over the past 20 years.
Concerning the alleged safety factor of "too much traffic ", it appears to be a "Catch 22 ".
1 asked several neighbors about the traffic. The comment was that the traffic was generated
mostly by parents driving their kids to school. Furthermore, if there is a problem,
it is that they drive too fast!
I do NOT support NO. S -076. It is an "improvement" that is unwarranted and an unnecessary
waste of taxpayer money. A more reasonable solution would be for parents to stop driving
their children to school. And, for the Edina police to stringently enforce the speed limit in the
neighborhoods adjacent to Countryside school. The City of Edina has no control over parents
driving their children to school. However, Edina police do have the authority to strictly enforce
the speed limit around Countryside school.
Thank you.
Eugene H. Rasschaert
5629 Wycliffe Road
Edina , MN 55436
City of Edina
May 19, 1999
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT - PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT NO. S -076
COUNTRYSIDE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL NEIGHBORHOOD:
STUART AVENUE AND GROVE STREET
The Edina City Council will meet at the Edina City Hall, on Tuesday, June 1, 1999 at 7:00 PM, to consider the
Public Hearing on the construction of sidewalks along Stuart Avenue from Countryside Elementary School to
Grove Street and along Grove Street from Stuart Avenue to Arbour Avenue. This hearing is being conducted
under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429.
This hearing has been called as a result of a eta ition from 40 residents in the neighborhood. The estimated
project cost is $26,800. The cost of the project will be funded by special assessment. The estimated cost per
assessable lot is $200 and could be divided over a ten year period with interest accumulating on the unpaid
balance. Under current City policy, maintenance (snow removal) of the sidewalk will be the responsibility of
the homeowner.
The sidewalk is proposed to be five feet wide and constructed of concrete. The alignment will be adjacent to
the back of curb and gutter. The proposed project would be constructed in 1999, with the assessment hearing
occurring in late September or early October.
The area proposed to be assessed the cost of the proposed improvement includes:
Lot 1, Block 1 & the N 10' of W 1215/10' of Outlot 1, and Lot 1, Block 2, Clagramar Addition; Lots 2 & 3, Block
2, Fridlund's Addition; Lots 1 thru 7, Block 1, Broadmore Addition - 2nd Replat; Lot 2 thru 4, Blk 1, Broadmore
Addition Eliason Replat; Lot 4, Blk 3, Broadmore Addition; Lots 1 thru 6, Blk 1, Lots 1 thru 4 and 7 thru 14, Blk
2, Lots 1 thru 24, Blk 3, Lots 1 thru 9, Block 4, Edina Highlands Lakeside Addition; Lots 1 and 2, Block 1,
Edina Highlands Lakeside; All of Blocks 2, 3, & 4 incl vac sts in Lyle 2nd Addn and all of Blk 2 in Broadmore
Addition.
Your receipt of this notice is an indication that property whose ownership is listed to you is among those
properties that are considered to be benefited by the improvement.
Any inquiries, comments and /or suggestions you may have regarding this improvement may be forwarded to
the City Council or Engineering Department prior to the hearing or presented at the hearing itself. If you desire
additional information, please call Wayne Houle at 826 -0443 between 8:00 AM and 4:30 PM, Monday through
Friday.
The City Council can authorize the proposed project immediately upon the close of the hearing.
Thank you, n
4rancis J. Mo n, P.E.
Director of Public Works and City Engineer
City Hall (612) 927 -8861
4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 826 -0390
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 826 -0379
a
1
f w9S��r�
INFORMATIONAL MEETING
COUNTRYSIDE ELEMENTARY NEIGHBORHOOD
SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS
AGENDA
1. PURPOSE OF TONIGHTS MEETING
• FACT FINDING - GATHERING PROCESS
NEIGHBORHOOD INPUTS:
USE POST -IT NOTES AND PLACE ON MAPS
WRITE DOWN ON LEGAL PAD TONIGHT
TELL ME
CALL ME
WRITE TO ME
SPEAK AT PUBLIC HEARING
2. PETITION PROCESS
3. PROJECT
• HISTORY
• PROJECT
• SCHEDULE
• ASSESSMENTS
4. NEXT STEP - PUBLIC HEARING: JUNE 1
5. QUESTIONS
INFORMATIONAL SHEET
o COUNTRYSIDE ELEMENTARY NEIGHBORHOOD
SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS
CITY OF EDINA
PROJECT: This project was initiated by a petitioned circulated by residents around Countryside
Elementary School. The proposed project will consist of constructing sidewalks along the westerly side
of Stuart Avenue and along the southerly side of Grove Street from Stuart Avenue to Arbour Ave. The
sidewalks will be 5 feet wide concrete walks and will be placed adjacent to the existing curb and gutter.
SCHEDULE: The construction for this project should take approximately three to eight weeks depending
on the weather.
The proposed preliminary schedule is as follows:
Informational Meeting ........................May 19, 1999
Public Hearing ....... ...........................June 1,1999
Begin Construction .....................July / August,1999
Complete Construction ...... August / September, 1999
Final Assessment Hearing ......... Fall of 1999 or 2000
Please keep in mind that this project is "proposed only" until the City Council orders it at a Public Hearing.
Also, you will be notified of the public hearing date at least ten days prior to the public hearing.
ASSESSMENTS: The assessments for this project are preliminarily setup on a per lot basis, meaning all
lots will be assessed equally. Proposed assessments for this project are ±$200 per lot. Assessments are
typically added to the tax roll after the final assessment hearing and can be spread -out over 10 years.
NEIGHBORHOOD INPUT OPPORTUNITIES: Residents from this neighborhood will have opportunities
for input at both the informational meeting and the public hearing, or you can call Wayne Houle at 826-
0443.
NOTES:
MIMI rrulecz vvaI
chool Cost
ity Cost
pecial Assessme
PROPOSED AS!
(Approximately
PRnPn3En AND
15 sug
i, 0
s o0
4_dnn
Ilyl�t�lr��- 'i[•[-
�Prnnnsnn s
Cnool
alaew�l
Ores
a�ccrt�anf
O e
���bHIg1V`T�•
City of Edina.
May 7, 1999
Countryside Elementary Neighborhood Sidewalk Improvements
Edina, MN
Re: Resident Letter No. 1
Informational Meeting Announcement
Countryside Elementary Neighborhood Sidewalk Improvements
Dear Resident:
The City of Edina received a petition from the Countryside Elementary Neighborhood for
sidewalk installation on Stuart Avenue and a portion of Grove Street. See attached map for
locations. The City of Edina is hosting an Informational Meeting regarding this project to
be held on Wednesday, May 19, 1999 at Countryside School, 5701 Benton Avenue, in the
cafeteria, at 7:00 PM.
The meeting format will consist of a short presentation followed by an informal question and
answer session. The presentation will cover scope of work and average assessment costs. If
you cannot attend this meeting please contact me at 826 -0443 and I will answer any questions
you may have.
Sincer ly, 4Z
Way ?D`.Flou e, PE
Assistant City Engineer
Attachment
c: File
City Hall (612) 927 -8861
4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 826 -0390
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 826 -0379
Total Projec
School Cost
City Cost
Special Assessments
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT AF
(Approximately $200 per lot)
PROPOSED SIDEWALKS
WARDEN AVE
Propo d Assessment Area
5621
5625
5629
W
Q
} 5633
Q
Q
D!
H
S61A 51
51
5715
5616 5f
5601
5805
5809
5813
5917
5921
W
Q
5925
}
U¢ BEN'
5901 56
5909
5919
k 1 5620 156
33-z -9 ,) /?
�y
I Be
REPORT/RECOM
MENDATION
To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
From: DEBRA MANGEN
CLERK
Date: OCTOBER 19,1998
Subject: PETITION RECEIVED
RECOMMENDATION:
Agenda Item VII.A.
Consent
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑
To HRA
ZTo
Council
❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Refer petition received to Engineering for processing as to feasibility-
INFO/
BACKGROUND:
The attached petition was received October 12, 1998, from residents in the Stuart
Avenue neighborhood requesting sidewalks on the west side of Stuart Avenue.
a
/o /iy�98
tAl OA, OWL,
V
»
OAL
aAA—
LIS-
tit
TOGS N S o "J
MA
X36
&J z,
�y- SSG f (`sfi��c r s rPs aA�S�
" 5
-�
s.
t
To: Concerned parents and residents of Countryside School area
A safety concern has existed for Countryside's walking students for a long time.
Stuart Avenue, which is the final approach block to the school for many walkers,
has become dangerous for our students to navigate with traffic, especially in winter
months when the roadway is narrowed by snow. In order for the students to be
protected from this traffic, we must get the kids off the street on this block.
We, the undersigned, propose that a sidewalk be installed on the west side of Stuart
Avenue. Naturally, the residents of this block should not be solely financially
responsible for this safety improvement. The cost for the sidewalks themselves
should be divided as follows: 25% to the school district, 257o to the city, of Edina, and
the remaining 50% divided among the residents of the Countryside School
area. division of cost is used on a direct traffic safety hazard for pedestrians
a ng the school
Of course none of us warA assessments for ourselves, but you should know that
there is a much more cost" in the works.The school district has made a
proposal to the city council tfiat sidewalks be installed not only on Stuart Avenue,
but also on Grove Street, Arbour Avenue, Wycliffe Road, Sun Road, and Amy
Drive. Also there is a plan to make a drive through area off Arbour, taking some of
the school land and increasing traffic on that street. The school has already
redirected some of the traffic onto Arbour, further adding problems in an area that
was not a problem before.
Installing sidewalks on Stuart Avenue represents the least expensive, most practical
solution to this safety problem for Countryside students.
Please support the safety of our walking children and sign this petition.
Thank you.
Qu*stions? 925 -1503.
W,_�t � O,
.F
1 Ste.
-A. :
A�ery� City of Edina, Minn"- ota DA�' '
In CITY COUNCIL
4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 —` -- - -
.' (612) 927-8861 • (612) 927 - 7645 -FAX • (612) 927 - 5461 -TDD
PETITION -TO THE CITY COUNCIL
SIDEWALK ❑ ALLEY PAVING ❑ WATERMAIN
❑ STORM SEWER ❑ SANITARY SEWER ❑ STREET LIGHTING
❑ CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ❑ PERMANENT STREET ❑ OTHER:
SURFACING WITH
CURB AND GUTTER
To the Mayor and City Council:
The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to
the locations listed below.
,.u.a r-�- A\MAAM, between 5800 and 581 �P
LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS
between
LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME
between
LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME
between
I.IX'A -r1ON OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME
and
ADDRESS ADDRESS
ADDRESS
ADDRESS
and
ADDRESS
and
ADDRESS
IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT
T11E CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE
PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERN19NED BY THE
COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES.
PROPERTY OWNER'S
SIGNATTU`RE �I
OWNER'S NAME
(PRINTED)
Lp'CL &clr^
/' / :f � C .c jIs
L' ��4-LtL.
PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNER'S
PHONE
5 gab
5'-4 cn -q,, -r
ikoT
4zz-0 �Y�esre �.'i' l7tir,� %`ZZ —Z) ?7
591t. C wave- S +. Q2-1 -512/
58l7 Affve- 9,�7-5-WO
THis petition was circulated by:
fkAME %2�� ppue_�� �12s = !S"o•��
h re Is i
space f0 ore signatures on the back or ou may attach extra page s� „�
t'r `
PR(S-put-l-V owNFWS OwNb'.H'S NAME
SIGNATURE (PRINTED)
ov
OA
WILI-iAH t -- —
) .
I A lie
'-Ef-y'va-0:5
eo"'A
6, u
OWNER'S
VIIONK
x(22 - Y X20
C, f-7 -(II cl /I
(Oaoq -4anse. -7 a
122-
.57 a 6rcue, Sf 3G
rz-g-
04 it
)92
9 22
qlA -'
92&- 3940
i
0
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Craig Larsen
City Planner
Date: June 1, 1999
Subject: Comprehensive Plan Update
Recommendation:
Info /Background:
Agenda Item: III. A.
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑
To HRA
®
To Council
Action
❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Attached is a.draft update of the Comprehensive Plan. The Plan has been
reviewed and recommended for approval by the Planning Commission and Park Board.
A public hearing on the Plan is scheduled for June 15, 1999.
otLe
• ," ✓p •
REPORD/REC OMMENDATION
To:
MAYOR AND COUNCIL
Agenda Item
IV.A.
From:
ERIC ANDERSON
Consent
❑
ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER
Information Only
❑
Date:
JUNE 1, 1999
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
®
To Council
Subject:.
REQUEST BY METROPOLITAN
®
Motion
RADIO BOARD FOR A 800 MHz
❑
Resolution
TOWER LOCATED SOUTH OF
❑
Ordinance
BRAEMAR ARENA _ '
®
Discussion
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve 800 MHz tower concept and give direction on lease terms.
INFO/BACKGROUND:
Staff has been working with Hennepin County and some commercial carriers to
co- locate a number of antennas on the Gleason water tower. After a long
process of review and recommendations from our consultants, staff suggested
the Metropolitan Radio Board /County consider some alternate locations in Edina.
The attached request details the Metro Radio Board /County's proposal for a
tower located south of Braemar Arena. This proposal provides information on the
need for a tower in Edina, the type of tower that would be built and proposed
lease arrangements for the tower.
Staff recommends this proposal over the location on the Gleason water tower for
a number of reasons:
• Difficulty and expense of painting the tower
• Magnitude of equipment proposed for the tower
Fj
REPO RTIRECOM MEN DATION - TOWER REQUEST SOUTH OF BRAEMAR ARENA
June 1, 1999
Page two
• Resistance from neighborhood
• Aesthetics of the proposal
• Lease complications
The proposed tower would have minimal residential impact and would meet a
need for public safety communications for the Metro area. Staff will have a
presentation that will detail both the south Arena tower and Gleason tower
proposals. If the Council approves this concept, staff will be seeking direction on
the terms of the lease for this project.
HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
Communications Division
9300 Naper Street
Golden Valley, MN 55427
May 24, 1999 Patrick D. McGowan, Sheriff
Eric Anderson, Assistant City Manager
City of Edina
4801 West 50`h Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424 -1394
Dear Mr. Anderson:
The purpose of this letter is to formally request the City Council, City of Edina to consider a
request by the Hennepin County Sheriff s Office on behalf of the County and the Metropolitan
Radio Board to approve the construction of a 180 foot, free standing public safety radio
communications tower on City property immediately south of the Braemar Arena, along
Minnesota State Highway 169. This request is being made because of the essential need for a
radio communications antenna site in the City of Edina for the new 800 MHz public safety radio
system and for concerns expressed for the installation of multiple user radio equipment on the
Gleason Water Tower.
We appreciate the assistance that you, Fran Hoffinan and the City's consultants have provided to
help identify a mutually suitable site for locating the new 800 MHz radio system equipment. We
also recognize the City's goal to collocate commercial wireless users within the City to the extent
possible.
The following materials are attached as background information to this request:
History of Request to the City for a Tower Location
800 MHz Radio System Project Overview
Technical Need for a Tower Site in the City of Edina
Critical Project Timelines
Braemar Tower Proposal
Next Steps if Approval is Granted
We look forward to meeting with you and the City Council June 1, 1999 to review and discuss
this request. If you have any questions, please call me at 525 -6260.
Sincerely,
"— "John Urbach
Assistant Radio Systems Manager
c. Enclosures
Hennepin County is an equal opportunity employer
HISTORICAL OVERVIEW
1993
- The Hennepin County Board of Commissioners at the request of local police, fire and
EMS agencies directs a study, report and recommendations for improving public safety
communications within the County.
1995
- The Minnesota Legislature directs all seven Metropolitan area counties to complete a
public safety communications needs assessment which examines the role and use of 800
MHz trunked radio technology proposed for the seven county Metropolitan area.
The Hennepin County Board of Commissioners approves a long term communications
plan for the County which proposes to migrate all users of existing two way radio
systems to an 800 MHz radio subsystem of the Regionwide Metro 800 MHz project.
Hennepin County submits 800 MHz subsystem plan to the Metropolitan Radio Board
for approval pursuant to State Statute and indicates intent to build an 800 MHz radio
subsystem with the State of Minnesota, Metro Transit and City of Minneapolis.
Ron Vegemast Engineering Inc. writes letter to City of Edina indicating the Gleason
Water Tower has been identified as a highly desirable site to locate. 800 MHz radio
equipment. Information is provided on the site needs, equipment specifications and
requests direction on how to proceed if use of the site is acceptable to the City.
- A site sketch plan, equipment and shelter specifications are forwarded to the City for
review and recommendations.
1996-1997
County, consultant and City staffs review and consider various design and technical
options for locating 800 MHz public safety equipment at the Gleason Water Tower. A
draft lease is forwarded to City for review and consideration.
1998
Revised draft leases for use of land and Gleason Water Tower provided to the City for
review and consideration.
City of Edina receives request from APT to relocate current antennas adjacent to
Gleason Water Tower to top of water tower.
City issues Request For Proposal for use of City properties for telecommunications
installations. City facilitates meeting of all interested telecommunications users for the
Gleason Water Tower. City provides guidance for the development of a single Gleason
Water Tower site plan and proposal that would attempt to address various concerns.
1999
APT prepares comprehensive site and design plans and specifications for the collocation
of four telecommunication users at the Gleason Water Tower.
City staff and consultants review comprehensive telecommunications plan for Gleason.
Water Tower and indicate concerns to County regarding use and recommend pursuing
alternative site for 800 MHz radio system equipment focusing on Braemar Park area.
800 MM RADIO SYSTEM PROJECT OVERVIEW
The Hennepin County 800 MHz radio subsystem is part of an overall nine county radio system
infrastructure under the oversight of the Metropolitan Radio Board. The initial radio system build
out also includes the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation, City of Minneapolis,
Carver County and Metro Transit.
Key features of the County subsystem:
Two radio subnetworks — East and West. The sixteen transmitter /receiver sites in the subsystem
represents one of the most densely built systems constructed to date.
A 95% radio coverage guarantee with a portable radio, on the belt with antenna, against the body,
in building, above ground:
- In- building East Network design is guaranteed for medium industrial buildings; and
- In- building West Network design is guaranteed for light industrial buildings.
- Greater than 95% countywide mobile and outdoor portable radio coverage.
Advanced radio and system features and functions to improve radio user safety, service or
business options, enhanced mutual aid and interoperability. Radio features include encryption,
secure conversation capabilities, imbedded signaling to identify radios and send status messages,
individual radio call alert encode /decode, emergency call, scanning, telephone interconnect, out -
of -range indicator, analog 800 MHz mutual aid.
Immediate availability of predefined intra and inter agency communications, mutual aid and
interoperability with other 800 MHz users.
Independent Public Safety Answering Points continue to maintain operational autonomy while
using all the features of the new 800 MHz radio system.
Significant radio system reliability due to "loop protection." Two alternate routes serve each
transmitter /receiver site so if one pathway is broken, the other will remain intact and the radio
system remains fully operation where conventional county and city systems would fail.
The County subsystem will maintain many trunked radio functions and radio features even in the
event of a catastrophic failure of a site or the network controller.
A high speed mobile data system planned for operation on the 800 MHz high capacity microwave
system has been funded with initial planning and design work commencing in 1999.
Area wide communications available throughout the nine county area when needed.
Overall system is "open architecture" enabling multiple vendors of end user products.
System uses trunking and digital modulation for voice communications.
The radio system use 12.5 KHz band width enabling the use of radio frequencies in the project
not otherwise available to increase the number of radio users.
All radio system users have same feature set and capabilities available to them.
TECHNICAL NEED FOR AN 800 MHZ TRANSMITTER/RECEIVER SITE IN EDINA
The Hennepin County 800 MHz radio system is comprised of 16 transmitter /receiver sites within
and adjoining the County. Exhibit I displays the configuration of all transmitter sites within the
regional radio system. The high - density coverage and radio performance standards established
for the County radio subsystem drives the need for a radio site in the area of the Gleason Water
Tower or Braemar Park. Exhibits lI and III show the projected 40 dbu radio signal coverage
(propagation) expected from transmitter /receiver sites located at the Gleason Water Tower and
Braemar Park respectively. Movement of the antenna site to the south and west changes the radio
system coverage in a concurrent manner.
Because the new system is a "simulcast" radio system, simultaneous radio signal transmissions
from other sites in the system (Glen Lake, Golden Valley, Bloomington) will help "fill in" the
coverage pattern changes. Tower sites serving the Hennepin County radio system must be spaced
6 — 8 miles a part in order to achieve the in- building communications performance and reliability
required for the new system.
The Braemar Park site continues to enable the microwave connection of Edina police, fire and
EMS into the new 800 MHz via their public safety answering point at City Hall.
CRITICAL 800 MHZ PROJECT TIMELINES
Various components of the new 800 MHz public safety radio system are under contract for
production and delivery including:
• Contracts have been entered into to fabricate and ship the radio equipment shelter
buildings, including the Braemar tower site. Hennepin County has issued purchase
orders for eight shelters including one for an Edina area, site.
• Civil construction and technical work has commenced and is well underway at several
Hennepin County sites including Bloomington, Maple Plain, Golden Valley, Medina and
Plymouth.
• Bids for all other civil work on the regional project, which includes other Hennepin
County subsystem sites being prepared by the State of Minnesota will be received by
June 1 with work, scheduled to commence within 60 days.
• Contracts have been entered into to manufacture and install the radio and microwave
equipment at the Gleason Water Tower (or equivalent site.)
• Confirmation of the microwave locations, paths and equipment requirements are being
finalized for the manufacture, delivery and installation of the microwave system in April
2000.
Confirmation of an acceptable and suitable site for the location of 800 MHz radio system
equipment is a critical project activity and priority. A failure to identify an acceptable site will
have significant effects on other parts of the adjoining system components. The timeline to
construct a new tower and avoiding cold climate construction conditions requires an approved
site very soon.
TOWER PROPOSAL WITHIN THE CITY OF EDINA
Location
A freestanding tower is proposed to be located at City of Edina property, on the top of the hill,
immediately south of the Braemar Ice Arena and Pavilion parking lot, 7501 Highway 169.
Exhibit IV presents an image of the hill area proposed for the tower. The specific location would
be just over the top of the hill. Microwave path analysis shows multiple building obstructions to
the microwave path to the Bloomington tower site if the tower is moved further to the south.
Design and Specifications
The proposed tower is an open steel lattice style, self supporting PiRod tower. The specified
tower is 180' tall, with a low profile rotatable top for installing antennas. With the installation of
whip antennas, the tower height would be 200 feet. The base of the tower would be 22 feet
between each leg of the tripod. Exhibit V is a photo of the current 150' tower located at the
Hennepin County Sheriffs Office Patrol Division in Brooklyn Park. The proposed Braemar
Tower would be very similar, but 30 feet higher. Exhibit VI is a drawing of the tower showing
proposed tower and the location of 800 MHz public safety antennas. Currently, four — twenty
foot "whip" antennas are proposed for the top of the tower and three microwave antennas
required to connect and "loop" the communications equipment to other sites as follows:
4 foot microwave at 76 feet connecting site to the Glen Lake tower, Minnetonka;
4 foot microwave at 129 feet connecting site to Edina City Hall; and
6 foot microwave at 170 feet connecting site to Bloomington tower.
Microwave path analysis determines the height and size requirements of the microwave antennas.
The tower is designed to withstand wind forces of 92 miles per hour, with a one half inch of
radial ice load. The tower conforms to the 1998 Minnesota State Building Code. An equivalent
height monopole is not an alternative for structural, loading and cost reasons.
Collocation Opportunities
The tower is structured to accommodate multiple commercial wireless carriers to facilitate
collocation objectives of the City. The geographic location, proximity to major traffic and
business corridors and structural capacity of the tower make it suitable as a collocation facility
subject to local commercial carriers needs in the area and City review of antenna designs. The
number of commercial users will depend upon the specific antenna array requirements, but two
and perhaps three could be accommodated.
City Concerns Addressed
Key concerns identified by the City are addressed by the proposed Braemar Tower:
• Minimization of adverse environmental and aesthetic concerns;
• Opportunities to address current and future commercial wireless coverage needs in the
City; and
• Support for essential public safety and emergency communications needs in the
community and County at large.
Opportunities to Amortize Costs
The construction and relocation of essential 800 MHz public safety communications equipment to
the Braemar site represent a significant new financial expense for the County's portion of the
radio project in addition to the $35,000 expended for design and engineering analysis for the
Gleason Water Tower. Total County costs will increase $175,000 - $200,000 for design,
construction and changes to the microwave and radio contracts. Working with the City
cooperatively with a "no charge" land lease would be essential for the project to proceed.
Because of the tower's capacity for collocation of commercial users, the opportunity exists for
both the City and the County to recognize revenues from the site at some point. Depending upon
the needs of commercial wireless companies, there may be an opportunity for a joint venture
build out and asset transfer and deferred rent on a full or partial participation basis. Adequate
space would remain for additional tenants and revenue sharing opportunities.
Images of Towers
Exhibits VII -A — VII -E present several examples of similar lattice tower structures currently
installed around the County. While not precisely the same, they provide a reasonable frame of
reference for the visual image of the proposed Braemar tower. Exhibit VIII -A and VII-B present
a photo rendition of what the proposed Braemar tower may look like on the site without the
antennas a fixed.
NEXT STEPS
If the City Council provides approval and direction to the County and the City staffs to proceed
with site development and construction of a new public safety radio tower at the Braemar site, the
following activities will occur:
• County develops and releases Request For Bids for Braemar tower.
• City Council and County Board approve land lease and use agreement.
• City and County staff develops project work plan.
• City and County staffs develop mutually acceptable site plan and access road.
• City Staff reviews progress reports on project.
• Service road designed and construction requirements and costs defined.
• Site testing and preparation conducted.
• City reviews and approves plans and specifications.
• Building permits applied for tower and shelter foundations, and tower and shelter.
• Utility work requirements identified; approvals, easements and permits obtained.
• Construction commences, tower and shelter installed within 90 days.
While a number of activities following site approval by the City Council can occur, the overall
project to construct a new tower must commence soon to avoid more costly cold weather
construction techniques.
EXHIBT I
EXHIBT II
40 db THRESHOLD MAP
R
EXHIBT III
40 db THRESHOLD MAP
BRAEMAR SITE — 180' TOWER
0
v
0
el - 11 -
low
a
2
EXHIBIT V
150' PiRodTOWER
HCSO PATROL DIVISION
9401 83RD AVENUE NORTH
BROOKLYN PARK
0
EXHIBIT VI
PROPOSED BRAEMAR TOWER — 180' ¢ ,q
.VIEW OF TOWER LOOKING NORTH o,
Q w
on
A
z z
m
a o 0
3
a
z z
� u
c
200' Overall
T
CC
0
a
a
d
W
U
r.
cz
w
O
far.
w
a
w
c o
z e G
O o
Z u
.o
a�
Z d E
z ° o
O � U
r
EXHIBIT VII -B
COMMERCIAL TOWER
140'- 150'
MEDICINE LAKE ROAD AND HWY 169
r
EXHIBIT VII -B
COMMERCIAL TOWER
140'- 150'
MEDICINE LAKE ROAD AND HWY 169
GLEN LAKE GOLF COURSE
EXHIBIT VII -E
COMMERCIAL TOWER
140'- 160'
EAST OF GLEN LAKE TOWER, SAME VIEW
AS EXHIBIT VII -D
EXHIBT VIII -A
BRAEMAR TOWER RENDERING
EXHIBT VIII -B
BRAEMAR TOWER RENDERING
Y
o e `
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION
Info/Background:
Friday morning Tom Beutell of 6204 Parkwood Road brought in 50 letters from
residents in Parkwood Knolls. Mr. Beutell indicated that he planned to attend Tuesday
evening's meeting and deliver additional letters to the Council. A copy of one letter is
attached. It should be noted that identical letter were received from all the residents.
To: Mayor & City Council
Agenda Item VI.
From: Debra Mangen
Consent
City Clerk
Date:
Information Only
Subject: Parkwood Knolls
Mgr. Recommends ❑
To HRA
Resident Letters
®
Council
To
Action ®
Motion
❑
Resolution
Ordinance
Discussion
Info/Background:
Friday morning Tom Beutell of 6204 Parkwood Road brought in 50 letters from
residents in Parkwood Knolls. Mr. Beutell indicated that he planned to attend Tuesday
evening's meeting and deliver additional letters to the Council. A copy of one letter is
attached. It should be noted that identical letter were received from all the residents.
May 26, 1999
Edina City Council
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424 -1394
Dear City Council Members:
As Edina residents and parents of Edina Public School children, we are writing to the Edina City Council to
express our concern regarding increasing vehicular traffic in the Parkwood Knolls neighborhood. The multiple
problems associated with this safety- related issue require the immediate attention of the Edina City Council.
The increased Parkwood Knolls neighborhood traffic appears to be the result of non -Edina residents. The
non -Edina resident contingent is primarily comprised of Opus Development business commuters. The commuters
have shown a preference for the residential Parkwood Knolls streets in order to bypass the congestion of Highway
169 metered entrance ramps. Generally, the commuters are traveling through the Parkwood Knolls neighborhood
to access Blake, Schaefer, Interlachen Roads and Vernon Avenue. Of additional concern is that this traffic pattern
continues to increase.
The safety issues related to the commuter traffic are threefold: 1) high vehicular volume, 2) failure to obey the
30 MPH posted speed limit (vehicle speeds routinely in excess of 45 MPH to 60+ MPH) and 3) failure to obey
traffic control signage for Yield and Stop. Edina Police Department monitoring has corroborated this.
The Parkwood Knolls residential streets were neither intended nor designed to accommodate the volume of
traffic, the speed, and the recklessness of the business commuters. For safety sake, we as parents do not allow our
children to play in our own front yards. Nor do we allow our children to walk or bike on the street for fear that
they become the victim of a reckless driver. Adult pedestrians, bicyclists and animals are exposed to this unsafe
environment. This situation is completely unacceptable.
We ask that the City Council appropriate, and then propose to the residents, a suitable solution.
For the safety of all the residents, especially the children, and for the integrity of our neighborhood, we need
the City Council to act swiftly.
Sincerely,
Ov-
NC// 1/n Tom and Kari Beutell
Or- ``� 6204 Parkwood Road
935 -1858
MA +
rzB 7%_ � e 7
R E 1999 l
• PARKWOOD KNOLLS OF EDINA
• EDINA, MN
o�1Le
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION
To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
From: ERIC ANDERSON
ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER
Date: JUNE 15,1999
Subject: CALENDAR FOR YEAR 2000
BUDGET WORK SESSIONS
REPORT:
Agenda Item
Consent ❑
Information Only
Mgr. Recommends ❑
To HRA
To Council
❑
Motion
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
The following is a proposed calendar for the 2000 budget process:
July 6 5:00 Budget Assumptions /Overview
July 20 5:00 Budget Assumptions/Follow -up
September 7 7:00 Resolution Setting Maximum Tax Levy
Mid September Budget Hearing(s)
November/December Truth in Taxation Hearing(s)
December Adopt Year 2000 budget
0
Metropolitan Council
Working for the Region, Planning for the Future
May 19, 1999
Glenn Smith
Mayor
City of Edina
4801 W 50th St
Edina, MN 55424 -1394
Dear Mr. Smith:
f�
f�
The Metropolitan Council research staff has prepared a preliminary population and
household estimate as of April 1, 1998 for your community. Enclosed for your review is
a 1998 worksheet which includes 1990 Census background data.
The estimates are used by the Council to monitor population and household change
throughout the region. We strive to provide accurate estimates that treat municipalities
consistently. Questions concerning how the estimates are determined should be directed to
me at (651) 602 -1332 or by e-mail at kathy.johnson @metc.state.mn.us.
No reply from you is necessary. If you have comments regarding the estimates please submit
them to me in writing before June 11, 1999. This will ensure that issues are addressed in a
timely manner and that we will be able to deliver finalized estimates to the Department of
Revenue by the end of June. The estimates are used in the Department of Revenue's local
aid formulas and by the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MNDOT) for calculating
local street aids.
Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
Kathy Johnson
Community Development Division
Enclosure
230 East Fifth Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 -1626 (651) 602 -1000 Fax 602 -1550 TDD /TN 291 -0904 Metro Info Line 602 -1888
Art Equal Opportunity Employer
Metropolitan Council
Provisional Population Estimate
April 1, 1998
EDINA
Housing Units
Household Estimate
1990 Census Households
1998 Household Estimate
19,860
21,010
Population Estimate
1990 Census
1998 Estimated
1998 Estimated Occupied
Housing By Type
Housing Units
Completed Housing Units
Households
Single- family
12,297
12,445
12,233
Multifamily (incl. town homes)
8,685
9,302
8,777
Mobile Home
1
0
0
Total
20,983"
21,747
21,010
Household Estimate
1990 Census Households
1998 Household Estimate
19,860
21,010
Population Estimate
1990 Census Total Population
46,070
1990 Group Quarters Population
366
1990 Population in Households
45,704
1998 Population Estimate
47,235
1998 Group Quarters Population
406
1998 Population in Households
46,829
Persons per Household
1990 Census Persons per Household 2.30
1998 Persons per Household 2.23
All numbers are as of April 1 of each year.
'This total includes 157 unit(s) listed in "other' housing in the 1990 Census data. The Census defines these units as those
not fitting the defined housing categories, such as houseboats, railroad cars, campers and vans. Since no information on
"other" units is available between censuses, for purposes of 1998 population and household estimation, these units have
been allocated to the single and multiple family categories. This was done based on persons per "other' household and
the ratio of single - family to multifamily housing in the jurisdiction.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD
TUESDAY, APRIL 27, 1999, AT 7:00 P.M.
EDINA HISTORICAL SOCIETY - ARNESON ACRES
4711 WEST 70TH STREET, EDINA, MN
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Chairman Gary Nyberg, John Cooney, John McCauley and Lois Wilder
MEMBERS ABSENT:
Marilyn Curtis, Herman Ratelle and Donald Wray
STAFF PRESENT:
,Joyce Repya
OTHERS PRESENT:
Robert Vogel, Research Historian
Chairman Nyberg called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES:
Mr. Cooney moved approval of the minutes from the February 23, 1999, meeting.
Mr. McCauley seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried.
II. HISTORIC CONTEXT STUDY:
Chairman Nyberg welcomed Robert Vogel to the meeting and asked that Mr. Vogel
provide the Boardwith a progress report on the Historic Context Study.
Mr. Vogel explained that since meeting with the Board in February, he has
completed the outlines for the Historic Context Study which had been mailed to the Board
prior to the meeting.
At this point the context study is consistent with the federal requirements. However,
Edina's study will be somewhat unique to meet the goals of establishing a framework for
future studies.
Mr. Vogel observed that Edina's context study will not be another history book —
there are plenty of those. Rather the study will serve the City as a planning document with
goals that can be implemented in a 5 to 15 year timeframe.
Once the Context Study is complete, the HPB should move to the planning mode
where decisions as to surveys, the use of property and the level of regulation will need to
be made.
r
Chairman Nyberg pointed out that areas such as the Country Club District and
Morningside are easy to survey. The challenge comes in delineating the post war
development into separate neighborhoods and districts.
Board members agreed that the post -war development in Edina was much broader
and not specific to an area.
Mr. Vogel suggested that the Board undertake a border to border survey of every
street in the City to identify original structures which are part of Edina's agricultural
heritage. These bits and scraps of the City's past may be all that's left of Edina's agrarian
heritage that was hard hit by the Twentieth Century,
Mr. Cooney asked Mr. Vogel why the Board should undertake historic surveys. Mr.
Vogel explained that it is through the surveys that tangible links to the past are identified.
Ms. Wilder observed that she felt the HPB should start researching the City on the
neighborhood level, Ms. Wilder pointed out that over time, some neighborhoods have
been redefined (or cut -up) as highways were built.
Board members agreed with Ms. Wilder that identifying neighbors would be a good
starting point.
Ms. Repya advised the Board that as part of the research for the Historic Context
Study, Mr. Vogel has asked that a City tour with members of.the HPB be organized
sometime in June.
Board members agreed that a tour would be an excellent idea. Tuesday, June 15th
at 6:00 p.m. was the tentative date set for the tour. Ms. Repya stated that she would check
on the availability of using the Edina Senior Center van on that date.
In conclusion, Chairman Nyberg thanked Mr.'Vogel for his information update and
added that he was very pleased with the progress of the project thus far; all board
members echoed. their pleasure. No formal action was taken.
III. ANNUAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONFERENCE:
Ms. Repya reminded the Board that an annual State Historic Preservation
conference is scheduled for Friday and Saturday, Mary 14 & 15, at the Regional Treatment
Center in St. Peter. The theme for the conference will be "Thinking About the
Unthinkable ", centering around the recovery efforts from a tornado which struck St. Peter
in March of 1998.
Ms. Repya pointed out that as a Certified Local Government City, Edina is required
to send at least one board member to the conference. The City will reimburse the $30.00
conference fee for attendees.
Ms. Repya then asked board members to check their calendars and let her know if
they would be available to attend the conference; she would then submit the registrations
to the Minnesota Historical Society. No formal action was taken.
IV. ADJOURNMENT:
8:15 p.m.
MINUTES
EDINA RECYCLING AND SOLID WASTE COMMISSION
MARCH 18, 1999
7:00 A.M.
MANAGER'S CONFERENCE ROOM
MEMBERS PRESENT: Inna Hays, Judith Smith, Anne Cronin, Kathy Frey, Bob Reid,
K.C. Glaser, Shelly Lipetzky
GUESTS: Paul Rosland, BFI
STAFF PRESENT: Solvei Wilmot
I. ROLL CALL
Meeting was called to order by Inna Hays, Chair, at 7:05 a.m.
II. MINUTES
Bob Reid MOVED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE JANUARY 27, 1999,
MEETING. Kathy Frey SECONDED. MOTION CARRIED:
III. TOURS
The commission will tour the BFI Recyclery April 15, 1999. Mr. Rosland will provide a
map for the commission members.
IV. BFI Update
Mr. Rosland reported that the merger with Allied Waste is expected to be completed in
August. The merger should not create any changes to recycling service locally.
Commission members inquired about the recycling brochure which BFI produced. Ms.
Wilmot distributed copies to the commission. Ms. Cronin commented that recycling bins
have been left in the driveway and that the drivers need to return them where they found
them.
V. STAFF REPORT
Annual Meeting & Volunteer Awards Reception
Ms. Wilmot inquired how many of the commission members would be attending the annual
meeting and the awards reception. Five members indicated they are planning to attend the
annual meeting. For the volunteer reception, five members are planning on attending.
Earth Day
Ms. Wilmot reported that the City does not have a, recognition day planned. Ms. Cronin
reported that Creek Valley is planting trees. Ms. Wilmot will check with other schools to see
if they have any events planned.
Recycling Contract Update
The recycling contract will be completed at the end of the year. As a result, the contract, will
be bid again this fall. Ms. Wilmot will present a bid packet to the Commission at the May
meeting.
VI. OTHER BUSINESS
Mr. Reid stated he has a meeting set for March 24 to meet with Jay Willemson of the Edina
School District to discuss the recycling within the schools.
VII. ELECTION OF OFFICERS
Bob Reid MOVED TO NOMINATE MS. FREY AS CHAIR AND JUDY SMITH AS VICE
CHAIR OF THE RECYCLING AND SOLID WASTE COMMISSION. Ann Cronin
SECONDED. MOTION CARRIED.
Ms. Frey and the commission'.members thanked Inna Hays for her leadership the past two .
years.
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
Meeting adjourned at 8:02 a.m.
a
EDINA COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICE ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Wednesday, January 27, 1999
7:30 p.m.
Edina Community Library
MEMBERS PRESENT: J. Paul O'Connor, Freda Terry, Mary Edwards, Bruce Burnett, Jim
Reynolds and Kathy Frey
EX OFFICIO MEMBERS: Lotem Almog
(non- voting members)
,MEMBERS ABSENT: Rev. Charles Vogt, John Fennig, Chip Evans, Carrie Christiansen
and Audrey Runyan
GUEST: Barton Erickson, Cornerstone; Kathy Iverson, City of Edina
Chemical Health Coordinator
I. ROLL CALL
Meeting was called to order by Chair J. Paul O'Connor at 7:35 p.m.
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: NOVEMBER 4, 1998
Freda Terry MOTIONED TO APPROVE THE MINUTES OF THE NOVEMBER 4, 1998
MEETING. Bruce Burnett SECONDED. MOTION CARRIED.
III. REPORTS
A. Domestic Abuse
Dr. Burnett reported that he did obtain some posters which could be used in the bathrooms or
other locations. This would approach the person in a private manner and allow them to get
information for help regarding domestic abuse. One poster talks about work place abuse the
other examples were about domestic abuse. The Committee could use these posters or use
these as examples to create their own posters
Ms. Edwards inquired what Dr. Burnett knew about the Men's Line. Dr. Burnett commented
that he was aware that the Men's Line is a resource for domestic abuse where a man might
report abuse.
Mr. O'Connor inquired if Ms. Frey had contacted any businesses. Ms. Frey said she had
contacted several Edina businesses and inquired if they would be willing to post a domestic
abuse poster. Norte of them had objected. Dr. Reynolds inquired if Southdale had a location
for posters. Ms. Frey will check. Dr. Burnett commented that a poster regarding work place
abuse may be also be posted at the different retailers.
Dr. Reynolds inquired if a sponsor for an ad for the newspaper could be found. Mr. Velde
M
commented that maybe the Tri-City coalition could buy ad space. He will check into that.
Cornerstone and Women Kind would be resources for more posters or more information.
Dr. Reynolds suggested an article in the paper as well as-an ad. Mr. O'Connor suggested a
letter to the editor. Dr. Reynolds stated the article could emphasize that this is a problem that
has been identified.
Mr. O'Connor stated with an initiative like this, someone within the committee is needed to
organize it. Someone to give direction and follow up.
Ms. Almog introduced Barton Erickson, a representative from Cornerstone that does PAVE
education. PAVE is Preventing Abuse and Violence through Education. He visits schools in
Bloomington, Eden Prairie, Edina and Richfield and does education in the area of dating
violence. He also educates the students about domestic violence, anger awareness, sexual
harassment, group and one on one counseling, and mentoring after school.
Mr. Erickson distributed some brochures. One brochure was targeting businesses and how
domestic violence affects the work place. Cornerstone also has a business card which has.
their phone number on it but does not indicate that it is from Cornerstone. This is for the
safety of the person needing the number. Mr. Erickson also had brochures for family
members "How Can I Help" that he distributed. Cornerstone can assist with temporary and
long term housing needs, intervention assistance with the courts, and restraining orders
assistance. Mr. Erickson reported for 1998 there were 173 referrals to Cornerstone from
Edina.
Mr. O'Connor inquired what his work is with teenagers. Mr. Erickson stated thathe makes a
presentation in every Health class. Every high school student in the four city area is reached
that way. He talks about both dating violence and domestic violence. Then after. the
presentation a response form is distributed to the class. It gives the students an opportunity to
share what they learned and if they would like to have a one on one meeting.
Students are referred to the Cornerstone counselors by the Deans, parents or friends.
Mr. O'Connor inquired if the response from each community, is the same. Mr. Erickson
stated that Cornerstone is just doing presentations in Edina and not doing project services for
anger awareness as he does in Eden Prairie, Bloomington and Richfield. The committee
inquired how Edina could have those services. Mr. Erickson stated he didn't know but could
find out and get back to the committee.
Another group that Cornerstone coordinates is SAVE, Students Against Violence
Environments, at Bloomington and Richfield. SPARC, Students Preventing Abuse
Relationships Committee is at Jefferson in Bloomington. These are a couple of after school
programs for teens to be involved in.
i
Dr. Reynolds inquired if there is a reduction in the numbers of abuse calls in the last six years
because of education. Mr. Erickson commented that there has been an increase in calls in the
last six years. The increase is probably due to the increased awareness about Cornerstone.
Mr. Erickson stated that in 1995 -96 PAVE met with 2600 students in the four communities.
In 1997, PAVE met with 5000 students. That was every tenth grader in their health class.
Dr. Reynolds inquired if the number of calls reflect the number of problems that exist and if
the Cornerstone programs are having a positive effect. Ms. Iverson stated that it is a hard
thing to measure. Ms. Almog stated that she was able to assist a person because she was
aware of Cornerstone. Mr. Erickson stated that the national statistic is that 1 in 40 high
school students will be affected by an abusive relationship before they graduate.
Mr. O'Connor inquired if the programs continued into the 1 Vb and 12'b grade class. Mr.
Erickson stated that it is just in the 10th grade classes. However, they are present in the after -
school programs. Ms. Iverson stated that Edina does not offer the after - school programs. It
is important to have something since the children are maturing and probably dating more as
they get into 12'h grade.
Ms. Almog stated that the programs like PAVE and SAVE embrace the Developmental
Assets because they look at the individual and not at the group as a whole. Mr. O'Connor
commented that he agreed and that programs like this can create an environment to prevent
problems.
Mr. Erickson commented that an environmental change is key. The level of acceptability for
appropriate behavior is different in each school. Ms. Frey inquired what creates the different
climates. Mr. Erickson stated the children in the schools. Some things are acceptable
behavior and other things aren't.
Ms. Frey stated that she was wondering what is the source of abuse. It didn't seem to be as
prevalent as it is now. Mr. Erickson stated he didn't know. Dr. Burnett stated that 20 -30
years ago things that were perceived as normal are now considered abusive. Dr. Reynolds
stated that there is a coarsening of our culture.
Mr. Erickson stated that youth deal with conflict by removing the problem. That is why there
are shootings in the schools.
Mr. O'Connor asked for each of the committee members to address whether as a committee
they would like to focus on this issue and what can be done from a community perspective in
order to improve community health.
Ms. Frey stated it is a good focus. There are some tangible things that the committee can do
and be able to measure the outcome. As a committee we should support getting the SAVE
program into the Edina High School. The committee can also work at distributing the posters
to businesses. Hand delivering the posters may have a better outcome than just mailing them.
Also, an insert in the water bills.
Dr. Reynolds commented that the SAVE program touches many young people and has many
facets that can be approached. Violence and abuse can be thought of in a broad sense not just
one person throwing a punch.
Ms. Almog stated this has been relevant. The more people who are aware of this, the better
off we will be.
Ms. Terry commented that we should start with students to bring more awareness and
education.
Dr. Burnett stated that we should focus on what it is that we want to accomplish. Should we
approach this through the adolescents or do we approach the broader community through
posters. The poster distribution is a little more labor for the committee, but it is important to
be able to get the information out there to everyone.
Ms. Edwards commented that 25 years ago help for an abused person was a problem. This
kind of discussion didn't exist. Women Kind at Fairview is a very good program but it is set-
up for after the problem has started. So getting a program going that focuses on educating
the youth, like Cornerstone. has, is tremendous. She applauded Cornerstone for their hard
work. She stated it would be hard to measure the results of that kind of a program. Results,
won't be seen for 20 to 25 years. SAVE should be a program available in the schools. Also,
promoting awareness of the different programs through the posters, and placing an ad in the
Edina Sun Current would provide better coverage of this issue. Ms. Edwards stated that
Fairview has a Public Relations person, Cynthia Beamus- Abrams, that we could approach
outside of her duties for Fairview, for assistance in getting the information out.
Mr. O'Connor stated there are a lot of good ideas. He asked for volunteers to Chair this
subcommittee. Ms. Frey and Dr. Burnett volunteered to Co- Chair.
Ms. Frey stated she would like to know exactly what is available'at the High School. Ms.
Almog stated that Cornerstone comes to the High School for the Health class which is given
each semester. As a result, each student gets two hours from Cornerstone, but there aren't
any after school programs like PAVE or SAVE. Ms. Iverson confirmed that information.
Mr. Erickson stated that Ann Harrington from Cornerstone would be best to contact to check
on availability for Cornerstone staff and who to approach at the schools. Mr. Iverson said we
should check with the schools to see if there is a need for an anger awareness program
Ms. Frey inquired who is Ann Harrington. Mr. Erickson stated she has been with
Cornerstone nine years and is the -Coordinator. She would know what Cornerstone is doing
for Edina schools and what is happening at other schools'.
B. ASSET BUILDING - Paul O'Connor and David Velde
The 40 Assets were mailed to the committee members and there is more information on the
internet through the Search Institute which produced the list of the 40 assets.
Mr. O'Connor handed out a list which indicated that the opportunity for the success of an
individual increases significantly as the individual is able to claim more and more assets.
The most balanced individuals have the most assets. The individuals that do not have many
assets still can succeed, as well as those individuals that claim more assets can blow it. The
main message is that the more supportive the environment, the better the chance the
individual has at being a better citizen. The Edina School District has undertaken this as part
of their strategic planning. Lotem Almog is part of that committee. In addition, two Edina
City staff members are on the committee, John Keprios, Park Department Director and
Gordon Hughes, City Manager. There are 13 people on the committee and they are going to
try and work out an action plan. They are going to conduct a survey next fall to assess the
current situation. They hope to determine the number of children that have 0 -10, 11 -20, etc.
assets. Then the school district will focus on the initiatives to benefit the children. The
School District, by the year 2000, plans to implement a better support system for these
particular assets.
The 40 Assets include avoiding dangerous behavior and Mr. O'Connor assumed that would
include avoiding alcohol, tobacco and drugs.
Dr. Reynolds inquired where the 40 Assets came from. Mr. O'Connor stated the Lutheran
Research group, The Search Institute and Peter Benson. Peter Benson started the study in the
early 1980's with the results in the early 1990's. Peter Benson resides in St. Louis Park.
Ms. Almog stated that in 1992 the Search Institute did a survey of Edina.
IV. Next Meeting
The next meeting will be a joint meeting with Richfield and Bloomington in the Edina
Council Chambers. The meeting will start at 7:00 p.m. with Dr. Cerra from the U of M,
Health Sciences on March 10, 1999. Dr. Cerra will speak about funding. The other
communities will give an overview regarding what they have done in the last year.
V. Kathy Iverson
There will be an article in the Edina Sun Current regarding the tobacco money settlement.
Edina is requesting money to be dedicated as an endowment, specifically for prevention.
Also, contact your legislators to let them know you would like to see an endowment for
prevention.
It is possible that the money could be returned as a rebate. But that is a one -time return and
the endowment would be a way to fund a continuous program. ,
Ms. Iverson distributed a brochure.
VI. ADJOURN
Meeting adjourned 9:00 p.m.
KAY MITCHELL �4y'N��c� PHONE
CLERK TO THE BOARD 'S'`� 348-5433
- gar
�akNEBQi
BOARD OF HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
A-24O0 GOVERNMENT CENTER
MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55487 -0240
May 19, 1999
TO: Various Municipalities
RE: HENNEPIN COUNTY APPOINTMENT TO NINE MILE CREEK WATERSHED
DISTRICT BOARD
Enclosed please find a copy of an extract from the minutes of the
May 18, 1999 meeting of the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners.
Please note, that Corrine Lynch of Eden Prairie, MN. was appointed
for an unexpired term of September 29, 1999, for the seat vacated
by Ed Schuck.
Yours truly,
udy umley
eputy Clerk of the Board
Encl.
/r
000s Y •I "'
Tuesday, May 18, 1999
One appointment to the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Board had been laid over from the previous
Board meeting.
Applications had been received from Roy Jenson and Corrine Lynch.
A vote was taken on the vacancy, as follows:
Commissioner . Nomination
Opat Jenson
Stenglein It
Dorfman Lynch
Tambornino Jensen
Steele Lynch
Johnson
McLaughlin 1.
Accordingly, Corrine Lynch was appointed.
l
ATTEST:
Clerk of the C unty Board
May 20,1999
Edina City Council
City of Edina
4801 West 50" Street
Edina, MN 55424 -1394
Dear City Council Members:
We have resided at 5616 Parkwood Lane, which is on the southwest corner of the intersection of
Dovre and Parkwood Lane, for many years and we are writing to the City Council to express our concern
over the enormous increase of vehicular traffic cutting through our Parkwood Knolls neighborhood
between 4 p.m. and 6 p.m. on weekdays.
This traffic began to increase several years ago when the traffic control meters were added to the
northbound Highway 169 access ramp at the Londonderry and Bran overpass. This traffic continues to
increase as more and more drivers exiting the Opus development on the west side of Highway 169 have
discovered they could avoid the bottleneck on the northbound Highway 169 access ramp during the late
afternoon exodus from Opus by cutting through our neighborhood.
This increased traffic is unacceptable for several reasons.
First, the sheer volume of traffic has disrupted what was intended to be a quiet residential
neighborhood. For example, between 5 p.m. and 5:10 p.m. on Wednesday May 12 , we counted 74 cars
turning off of Lincoln Drive and then traveling east on Dovre to its intersection with Parkwood Lane. From
there, approximately half of the vehicles turn left onto Parkwood Lane and then left or right onto Parkwood
Road. The other half of the vehicles continue from the intersection of Dovre and Parkwood Lane east on
Dovre and then turn left on Londonderry and then continue through the neighborhood to Schaeffer or
Blake.
Secondly, this traffic is creating unsafe conditions in the neighborhood because of its volume,
speed, and general failure to stop at stop signs. In this regard, on Monday and Tuesday May I Oh and I Vh,
the City of Edina police monitored the stop sign at the southwest corner of Dovre and Parkwood Lane and
the stop sign at Biscayne Blvd. and issued over two dozen traffic tickets for failure to stop at these stop
signs even though tickets, in general, were only being issued to.cars that, as one police officer stated, "blew
through the stop sign in excess of 15 miles per hour ".
Thirdly, as reported to me by one of the police officers, not one of these traffic tickets were issued
to Edina residents; all of the tickets were issued to drivers who were residents of other communities, some
from as far away as Moundsview. In other words, all of these ticketed drivers were using our residential
streets as arterial streets in lieu of facing the frustration of the delays incurred by reason of the meters on
e northbound Highway 169 access ramp.
Neither the City of Edina nor the residents of Parkwood Knolls intended the neighborhood's
interior streets to be used as a highway alternative by non — residents of Edina and this use should not
permitted.
The City Council should ask City Staff to conduct a traffic study to determine the relevant facts
and then take appropriate action to protect our neighborhood from this intrusive and dangerous traffic.
Although I will leave to the City the determination of the appropriate remedy to this problem,
prohibiting turns from Lincoln Drive onto Dovre ( both left turns and right turns) between 4 p.m. and 6
p.m. on weekdays would, in my view, solve the problem..
Very truly yours,
q L I &LI-AI\
ohn S. Crouch
Robert L. Crosby
5020 Malibu Drive
Edina, MN 55436
May 28, 1999
Edina City Council
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424 -1394
Dear Council Members:
I am in receipt of Mr. John Crouch's letter to you of May 20th, which I
believe he sent to a number of his neighbors. I concur with his views regarding
increased traffic, the source thereof, and his suggested solution. We reside at
5020 Malibu Drive, by the intersection of Malibu and Park Terrace, and much of
this late- afternoon traffic proceeds north on Malibu, and then gets back on
Highway 169 at the Lincoln Drive /South 5th Street entrance. Indeed I have used
this route myself when returning home from the Opus development area. I
realize you have no control over the ramp access policy.
We have also noticed a substantial increase, particularly in late afternoon,
of traffic at the intersection of Blake Road and Interlachen Boulevard. Much of
this may be due to traffic coming from Dovre, as Mr. Crouch suggests. There is
often a long line of vehicles going north on Blake Road, trying to get on to
Interlachen Boulevard, and similarly a line of vehicles going east on the western
extension of Interlachen Boulevard turning on to Blake Road.
I expect the traffic on Malibu Drive will increase because of the new
rental townhouse project on Lincoln Drive (behind us) and also because of the
recently approved large office building which will be built on Lincoln Drive and
West 7th Street, which no doubt will cause much increased traffic through the
Parkwood Knolls area during the coming -to -work and going -home times.
Incidentally, while the stop signs at Malibu and Park Terrace are good, the traffic
going north and south on Malibu is little inclined to pay much attention to
stopping.
Very truly yours,
ba�,, 4AOrl/r
Robert L. Crosby
cc: John S. Crouch
069640
Tom E. Emmer
5160 Malibu Drive
Edina, Minnesota 55436
Fax 612 - 935 -3800
Home Phone 612 - 935 -3700
Edina City Council
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Dear City Council Members,
May 24, 1999
I would like to join my neighbor, John Crouch, to express concern about the level of traffic on
Malibu Trail between four and six in the evening.
I know you have done traffic studies on Malibu in the past. The volume has picked up steadily
since we came here in 1995. This past week we waited a full two minutes to back out of our
driveway at 4:45. There was a steady flow of traffic south to north!
Something needs to be done soon.
Yours trul. ,
Tom E. Emmer
P. S. Stop signs don't seem to work - -they go right through them or just pause(Malibu and
Interlachen).
May 22, 1999
Edina City Council
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424 -1394
Dear City Council Members:
We were interested to read the copy sent to us, of the letter from Mr. John Crouch, regarding
the increased traffic going through Parkwood Knolls intersection of Parkwood Lane and Dovre.
Apparently many drivers coming from the Opus development are avoiding the congestion of
the entrance ramps to Highway 169, by driving through Parkwood Knolls.
We also have lived in this neighborhood for many years, and can understand Mr. Crouch's
concern about this increased traffic in our neighborhood. We live on the corner of Londonderry
and Field Way. The traffic on Londonderry has definitely increased also. We would also like
to see this problem corrected, however, the suggestion of prohibiting turns from Lincoln Drive
onto Dovre would create more problems for some of us. Many of us who live in this
neighborhood frequently need to use this route between 4 and 6 p.m. To prohibit all cars from
turning from Lincoln Drive onto Dovre, would cause us even more inconvenience and wasted
time. It would seem that there is a need to look more closely at the problems involved in entering
169 and also to examine the traffic coming from the many businesses in the Opus development.
The cities of Edina and Minnetonka, and perhaps Eden Prairie should be considering how to
redirect this traffic more effectively so that drivers won't be so tempted to race through our
residential neighborhood, and also so that traffic can flow with less frustration from Bren/
Londonderry onto 169.
Siplerely,
tit—
Roberta Ogurak
6600 Field Way
Edina, MN 55436
Lisa H. Fish, M.D.
5408 Larada Lane
Edina, MN 55436
May 24, 1998
Edina City Council
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Sirs:
I would like to express concern about the amount of through -traffic our neighborhood
carries during morning and evening rush hours. The cars move through Parkwood Knolls
quickly, often ignoring stop signs, and seem to come from the Opus complex area. I have
personal, knowledge of a friend who lives in Eden Prairie and works north on Highway
100, but commented that she drives by my house on her way to work every day because
the freeways are backed up. While I realize some through- traffic is unavoidable, I would
like to see this problem studied. If we have a problem with large numbers of out -of -town
cars cutting through our neighborhood similar to that found in Countryside several years
ago, then it could be addressed with traffic control measures. Thank you for your
attention to this concern.
Sincerely, — ()
Lisa H. Fish
May 26, 1999
Edina City Council
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424 -1394
Dear City Council Members:
As Edina residents and parents of Edina Public School children, we are writing to the Edina City Council to
express our concern regarding increasing vehicular traffic in the Parkwood Knolls neighborhood. The multiple
problems associated with this safety- related issue require the immediate attention of the Edina City Council.
The increased Parkwood Knolls neighborhood traffic appears to be the result of non -Edina residents. The
non -Edina resident contingent is primarily comprised of Opus Development business commuters. The commuters
have shown a preference for the residential Park-wood Knolls streets in order to bypass the congestion of Highway
169 metered entrance ramps. Generally, the commuters are traveling through the Parkwood Knolls neighborhood
to access Blake, Schaefer, Interlachen Roads and Vernon Avenue. Of additional concern is that this traffic pattern
continues to increase.
The safety issues related to the commuter traffic are threefold: 1) high vehicular volume, 2) failure to obey the
30 MPH posted speed limit (vehicle speeds routinely in excess of 45 MPH to 60+ MPH) and 3) failure to obey
traffic control signage for Yield and Stop. Edina Police Department monitoring has corroborated this.
The Parkwood Knolls residential streets were neither intended nor designed to accommodate the volume of
traffic, the speed, and the recklessness of the business commuters. For safety sake, we as parents do not allow our
children to play in our own front yards. Nor do we allow our children to walk or bike on the street for fear that
they become the victim of a reckless driver. Adult pedestrians, bicyclists and animals are exposed to this unsafe
environment. This situation is completely unacceptable.
We ask that the City Council appropriate, and then propose to the residents, a suitable solution.
For the safety of all the residents, especially the children, and for the integrity of our neighborhood, we need
the City Council to act swiftly.
Sincerely,
�-�
Robert and Elizabeth Hollway
6644 Parkwood Road
935 -4797
• PARKWOOD KNOLLS OF EDINA
• EDINA, MN
4 0
1pe
301 Second Street. North East Queen of Peace Hospital
New Prague, Minnesota 56071
(612) 758 -4431
1- 800 - 584 -6667
May 21, 1999
Edina City Council
4801 West 50`h Street
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Council Members:
On May 2, 1999, Doug Grow reported in the Star Tribune that you
had denied a request of N. C. Little Memorial Hospice to add addi-
tional space to serve the dying. We hope that you would reconsider
this action and attempt to find a solution that could satisfy all sides
involved.
Our mission at Queen of Peace Hospital is to serve and care for all
people as if they were Christ himself. We hope that you and the
community you represent will support Jackie Mc Gowan and Robert
Solheim's efforts to care for the people they serve in their "labor of
love."
Sincerely,
Loy J. Jeffrey, Chairperson
Ethics Committee
LJJ:mkd
An £dual O000rruniry Finnlnver
B. "Radha "krishna
3921 W. 60'h Street
Edina, MN 55424
2 (612) 927 -9790
May 22, 1999
The Mayor /City Council
City of Edina, MN.
Dear Sirs/Mesdames:
It is with some anguish I wish to report that the Citizens and children of the city of Edina
have the poorest access to high -speed connections to the internet among all the metro
areas. There are two technologies available to provide quicker access — cable modems
and DSL (branded "megabit service" by US West). Both these services are available in
most other parts of the metro. The principal impetus is, as usual, competition. Wherever
Media One offers its service, US West is gearing up to challenge them. In Edina,
Paragon Cable has been happy to limit its investments, and they do not offer cable
modems, nor to my knowledge do they have any plans to offer the service till perhaps
late 2,000. Consequently, US West does not seem to be worried that large parts of our
city is not wired to receive its megabit services. Unless the city acts to induce some
competition, I am afraid we will be left behind in the dark ages of the internet while the
rest of metro marches forward.
Since the city does have some influence in licensing cable services, I hope the city will
take measures to induce cable companies to offer cable modem services soon. That will
engender competition and will be beneficial to the entire city.
Thanks.
Sincerely,
A0.040-U
B. Radhakrishna
y -3u-99
� �q i2b8
yvos valky UltwIFA
—
too#j"Clo
RGt.G� �"P.Cd��LdG1��dGv G�ed'P.f'Y/e,
�f &��
ese/- a-�,td ak&,�
c y A4tmtC�raIed
sad a- c9f d�
" Tk w./. < s, S& wa
I jeg
790
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 273
Regular Meeting, May 24, 1999, 7:00 P.M.
Room 350, Edina Community Center
AGENDA
Regular Board Meeting
Determination of Quorum and Call to Order
Approval of Minutes of Meeting.of May 10, 1999
PRESENTATION - South View Middle School Students and Staff - Uses of
Technology
HEARINGS OF INDIVIDUALS, DELEGATIONS, AND PRESENTATION OF PETITIONS
FROM THE PUBLIC REGARDING ITEMS BEFORE THE BOARD FOR ACTION ( *SEE
ATTACHED DETAIL.)
ACTION Paae
427 Personnel Recommendations 791 -793
428 Expenditures Payable on May 24, 1999 794
429 Tax Increment Finance Rebate 795
430 Revised 1999 -2000 Early Childhood, Kindergarten, 796 -797
Elementary, Middle, and Senior High School Calendar
431 Board of Education Meeting Dates for 1999 -2000 798
CONSENT
432 Commendation of Berit Peterson 799
433 Commendation of JoAnne Farley and Jim Norman, 800 -801
Continuous Progress Teachers
434 Commendation of Zephyrus Newspaper and Advisor 802
435 Gift from Thomas and Marlese Vander Molen 803
436 Gift from Norman Bjornnes Jr. of Mulligan & Bjornnes Inc. 804
437 Gift from Marcia, Ken, Justin & Jennifer Koester 805
HEARINGS OF INDIVIDUALS, DELEGATIONS, AND PRESENTATION OF PETITIONS
FROM THE PUBLIC ON ANY ISSUE ( *SEE ATTACHED DETAIL.)
DISCUSSION
438 Strategic Plan for 1999 -00, appended 806
439 Revised Teacher Performance Appraisal, appended 807 -808
440
441
442
REPORTS
Revised General Fund Budget, 1998 -99
Proposed General Fund Budget, 1999 -2000,
Proposed Food Service Fund Budget, 1999 -2000
809 -817
818 -820
821 -827
Long -Range Technology Plan - Mike Burke, Larry Fuglesten,
Ware Washam
INFORMATION
443 Staff Recognition
Adjournment
NM
* Persons who wish to address the Board are requested to complete and
submit an appropriate form to the Board Secretary prior to the designated
hearing time. When recognized, each individual shall identify
himself /herself and the group represented, if any. He /She shall then state
the reason for addressing the Board and shall be limited in time at the
discretion of the Board chair. Individual employees of the School District
or representatives of employee organizations shall have utilized
administrative procedures before making a request to address the Board.
PETITION REGARDING STREET RESURFACING AND ADDITION OF CONCRETE
CURB AND GUTTER PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT A -184 OXFORD RESIDENTS
The undersigned are owners of the residences on Oxford Avenue, in the city of Edina, that are
affected by the proposed addition of concrete curb and gutter along with the street resurfacing
known as `Proposed Improvement A -184'.
It is on record that the useful life of bituminous roadways is thirty-five [35] years. It is also on
record that the streets are at the end of their useful life and in need of resurfacing. The
expenditure of funds for reclamation of the roadways is a prudent expense.
The record shows the roadways have lasted the full and expected life; without the benefit of
having concrete curb and gutter. There is no material benefit to be gained from the expenditure
of funds for the addition of concrete curb and gutter. On the contrary, if there is any mistake
while plowing, concrete curb and gutter damage city plows.
We want you to consider our opinions separate from the opinions of residents of any other street
in the proposed improvement.
WE DO NOT WANT CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER INSTALLED.
Aaaress Name
5343 Interlachen Blvd Ze W
5001
k_4 r/
5012
Lang
5013
5016
P�c�fsN j
5017
�►'
5020
5021
rnll P�
5024
d
5028
5029
5032
i
5033
5036
i
5037
5040
CjU ss.�u
5044
5045
oa.& .1X► 611b Buy-�Jz
i
Me ,
-5-. q-,?y
n
5 -4 -`9
s - /T - '9y
- -i17
y 99
s v