HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999-10-19_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
OCTOBER 19,1999
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL
ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the
Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items
marked with an asterisk ( *) in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered routine and
will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a
Commissioner, Council Member or citizen so requests it. In such cases the item will be removed from
the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the Agenda.
* I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA - Regular Meeting of October 5,1999
II. PUBLIC HEARING - Kunz /Lewis Redevelopment
* III. AWARD OF BID - 50th & France Waste Management Project
Rollcall IV. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS - as per pre -list dated 10//99, TOTAL: $175,148.47.
V. ADJOURNMENT
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Minutes of October 5, 1999
II. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS - Affidavits of Notice by
Clerk. Presentation by Planner Public Comment heard. Motion to close hearing. Zoning
Ordinances: First and Second Reading require 4/5 favorable rollcall of all members of Council
to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall of all members of Council to pass.
Final Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall
vote required to pass. Conditional Use Permit: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass.
Rollcall A. ORDINANCE AMENDMENT Establishing A Time Limit For Use Of An Approved Final
Development Plan
Rollcall B. Policy regarding Submission of Complete Development Plans Prior to Planning
Commission
* C. Edina Comprehensive Plan Years 1999 -2005 Extension
III. AWARD OF BID
* A. Water Treatment Plant #3 Rehabilitation (Continued to November 1, 1999)
B. Annual Road Salt Purchase
Agenda/Edina City Council
October 19, 1999
Page 2
IV. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS
* A. TRAFFIC SAFETY REPORT October 1999
I
* B. Set Hearing Date (11/16/99) Special Assessments
1. Maintenance Improvement Project M -99G (Grandview Business District)
2. Curb And Gutter Improvement Project B -099 - West 48th St. From Maple Road To
Townes Road
C. Wooddale Park Comfort Station
* D. Change Order - Maple Road Storm Sewer
* E. Set Hearing Date (11/16/99) Park Plaza Refunding Bond
F. Liquor Stores - Overview & Strategies
V. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS
A. Receive Petition Requesting Sidewalk On Hansen Road Between Benton & Vernon
Avenues
VI. CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
VII. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES
VIII. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL
IX. MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEM
X. FINANCE
Rollcall A. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS As Per Pre -List Dated 10//99 TOTAL: $609,130.26 and for
CONFIRMATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS As Per Pre -List Dated 10/13/99 TOTAL:
$1,061,542.08
SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS
Tues
Oct 26
Special Council Meeting 6:30 P.M.
Mon
Nov 1
Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M.
Tues
Nov 2
ELECTION DAY - REMEMBER TO VOTE
Thur
Nov 11
VETERANS DAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed
Tues
Nov 16
Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M.
Thur
Nov 25
THANKSGIVING DAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed
Fri
Nov 26
DAY AFTER THANKSGIVING - City Hall Closed
Mon
Dec 6
Truth In Taxation Hearing 5:00 P.M.
Tues
Dec 7
Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M.
Mon
Dec 13
Truth In Taxation Cont. Hearing 5:00 P.M.
Tues
Dec 21
Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M.
Thurs
Dec 23
CHRISTMAS EVE OBSERVED - City Hall Closed at noon
Fri
Dec 24
CHRISTMAS DAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed
Thur
Dec 30
NEW YEAR'S EVE OBSERVED - City Hall Closed at noon
Fri
Dec 31
NEW YEARS DAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed
CENTENNIAL LAKES CENTRUM
COUNCL CHAMBERS
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
COUNCIL CHAMBER
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
tP•
;II
o
��le
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION
To:
MAYOR AND COUNCIL
Agenda Item
HRA II.
From:
GORDON L. HUGHES
Consent
❑
CITY MANAGER
Information Only
❑
Date:
OCTOBER 19,1999
Mgr. Recommends
®
To HRA
®
To Council
Subject:
PUBLIC HEARING - KUNZ/
❑
Motion
LEWIS REDEVELOPMENT
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
®
Discussion
INFO/BACKGROUND:
On September 28, 1999, the HRA directed staff to prepare a financial analysis of the four
remaining development proposals for the Eden Avenue properties. Since that meeting,
staff and our finance consultant have conducted individuals work sessions with each of
the four developers - Frauenshuh Companies, Jerry's Enterprises/Namron/Laukka- Jarvis,
Opus Construction/Ron Clark Construction and Stuart Companies. The following report
is based upon these meetings and our in -depth review of their respective development
proposals.
Our objective in this analysis_ is to present an even -handed comparison of each proposal,
mainly from the financial standpoint. Based upon HRA direction, we have also included
a review of issues related to traffic, affordable housing and the risk position of the City.
Staff emphasizes that the HRA is still in the "developer selection" phase of this process.
We have not conducted negotiations with each developer. We believe this should be
reserved for the developer ultimately selected by the HRA. In this regard, we emphasize
N.
- -- REPORT/RECOMMENDATION - Public Hearing - Kunz/Lewis Redevelopment
October 19, 1999
Page two
that all developers remain very flexible in terms of their proposed site plans and their
approaches to financing the project.
SIMILARITIES OF PROPOSALS
All four proposals are similar with respect to 1) the method of acquiring additional
properties, 2) the inclusion of the library and senior center in the development plan, 3) the
use of tax increments generated from the proposed development as well as the existing
TIF district to finance redevelopment costs and 4) the developer's willingness to modify
their proposed site plan to accomplish City goals.
As to property acquisition, all developers suggest that they will take the lead in
negotiating the acquisition of additional properties needed for their respective. proposals.
All, however, will require that the HRA commit to exercising its condemnation authority
if private negotiations are unsuccessful. The condemnation process is described in detail
in the attached February 10, 1997, memorandum from Mr. Gilligan et.al. Although this
memo was directed at the purchase of the Kunz Oil and Lewis Engineering properties, it
is relevant to properties now under consideration.
As to plan modification, all developers expressed a willingness to modify their
developments to respond to City goals. These modifications could include the
rearrangement of uses on the properties as well as a reduction in the scope of the project
were all properties not available for acquisition.
HRA / CITY RISKS
The following risks should be considered when evaluating each proposal:
HRA signs letter of intent with developer who fails to perform and must be
replaced with a new developer. The consequence of this situation is twofold.
First, the HRA may not qualify to use tax increments for the senior center and
library due to the new restrictions that take effect at year end. Second, such a
default would cost time. The Grandview tax increment financing district
terminates in 2010. The TIF cash flow projections prepared by Ehler's illustrate it
is essential to generate new tax increments as soon as possible to pay for public
redevelopment costs. Delays adversely affect the financial feasibility of the
proj ect.
HRA/City incurs project costs but developer later fails to perform on all or
part of the development. With this scenario, the HRA has incurred costs which
must be repaid through the generation of tax increments. If the development did
t�
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION - Public Hearing - Kunz/Lewis Redevelopment
October 19, 1999
Page three
not proceed, sufficient increments may not be generated and the City would be
required to repay such costs by other means.
HRA/City sells bonds and incurs costs, developer performs on obligations
but project does not generate sufficient increments to service debt. This could
occur because 1) the market value of properties within the Grandview district go
down, 2) property owners default on the payment of taxes, 3) the State alters class
rates which shift the tax burden and thereby reduce increments' from the
development, 4) the State imposes new TIF rules and applies them retroactively,
or 5) the State makes "wholesale" changes to the property tax system such -as
shifting school funding from property taxes to sales /income taxes thus causing a
reduction in tax increments. If the City is not adequately protected from such
occurrences, it would need to repay project costs by other means.
Project relies on acquisition of additional properties which cannot be
purchased for a reasonable price or within an adequate time. All proposals
are based upon the need to acquire additional properties. If such purchases cannot
be negotiated, condemnation will be required. Com
ndenations can become a
lengthy process as outlined in Mr. Gilligan's memo. If the project is stalled .by
such an action or if the condemnation award is excessive, the feasibility of the
project could suffer.
The HRH's risk position with respect to the completion of the project was discussed at
our developer interviews. Please note that these meetings were held prior to the
completion of the Ehler's analysis. These proposals were suggested by the developers
with the assumption that their projects were feasible from a tax increment standpoint:
FRAUENSHUH COMPANIES. Frauenshuh proposes that public costs would
be financed through a combination of City issued general obligation bonds and a
private "pay as you go" ( "PAYG ") note. (Please refer to Ehler's report . for
details.) A PAYG note is a method by which the developer privately finances the
cost of certain TIF eligible improvements. The developer is then repaid for these
costs by the HRA which pledges tax increments received during the life of the TIF
district for this purpose. Such notes typically bear an interest rate which reflects
the cost of private borrowing rather than public borrowing which could be
achieved through the issuance of bonds. The advantage of PAYG to the HRA is
that the developer typically assumes the risk that tax increments will be generated
in sufficient amounts to repay the note.
In this case, Frauenshuh proposes that the HRA and Frauenshuh each assume a
proportionate share of the risk that sufficient increments will be generated. In
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION - Public Hearing - Kunz/Lewis Redevelopment
October 19, 1999
Page four
other words, if the City issues bonds to finance say two thirds of the
improvements, then it would be entitled to receive two thirds of the increment and
Frauenshuh would be entitled to one third of the increment for the PAYG note. If
the increment is insufficient, each entity's share would be proportionately
reduced.
JERRY'S ENTERPRISES ET AL. Jerry's Enterprises, et.al. proposes that all
TIF eligible improvements will be financed by City issued general obligation
bonds. Jerry's et. al. proposes that they will enter into a "shortfall" agreement with
the City which will guarantee that they will pay debt service on the bonds to the
extent that tax increments are not sufficient to pay such debt. The form of this
guarantee was not discussed.
OPUS CONSTRUCTION/RON CLARK CONSTRUCTION. Opus /Clark,
like Frauenshuh, also suggests a combination of City issued general obligation
bonds and a PAYG note. (Please refer to the Ehler's report for details.) In this
case, however, Opus /Clark proposes that tax increments first be applied to the
City's bonds and any remaining amounts be applied to the PAYG note.
STUART COMPANIES. Stuart proposes an arrangement whereby all public
costs will be included in a PAYG note. Under this arrangement, Stuart assumes
the risk that sufficient tax increments will be generated to cover all public costs.
Again, refer to the Ehler's report for details.
AFFORDABLE HOUSING
The issue of affordable housing as a component of the redevelopment project was
discussed at the September 28, 1999, meeting. What is "affordable housing ?" According
to the Metropolitan Council, affordable ownership housing is that which can be afforded
by persons earning at least 80% of the region's median income. Affordable rental housing
is based upon 50% of regional median income. Such incomes are generally based upon a
family of four. Based upon these criteria, the Metropolitan Council's 1999 threshold for
ownership affordability is $134,250. The affordability threshold for rentals is $715 per
month for a two bedroom unit.
The proposed sale /rental price ranges for each proposal are as follows:
Frauenshuh
For Sale Condominiums $190,000 - $210,000
Townhouses $395,000 - $425,000
4
'�.
ma
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION - Public Hearing - Kunz/Lewis Redevelopment
October 19, 1999
Page five
Jerry's/Laukka Jarvis/Namron
For Sale Condominiums
Rentals
Opus /Clark
For Sale Condominiums
Stuart
Rentals
$150,000 - $200,000
$600 - $2,000 /month
$190,000 - $350,000
$1,000 - $2,000 + /month
All developers expressed a willingness to consider an affordable component to their
proj ects.
BUSGARAGE
The Board of Education has adopted the attached resolution affirming the District's
position on the bus garage issue. Redevelopment of the bus garage property and
reconstruction of a new garage on terms acceptable to the District present a financial
issue as well as a land use issue.
First, as to the financial issue, staff has previously advised that tax increments cannot be
used for the construction of a bus garage. Tax increments, however, can be used for the
purchase of the existing bus garage property. We believe that a purchase price for this
property of approximately $1,000,000 could be justified. The estimated cost for a new
facility could range from $1.8 million to $2.3 million. Therefore, we have a funding gap
of $800,000 to $1.3 million which cannot be covered either directly or indirectly from tax
increments.
Second, the proposed solutions to the bus garage issue all seem to be less than desirable
from a land use standpoint. Although the facility would be relocated to a much more
attractive building, it would remain as somewhat of an incompatible use with the other
components of the redevelopment.
For the above reasons, we have asked that Ehlers also review the feasibility of each
project if the existing bus garage property were not available for development. This is
presented as an alternative to the base proposal from each developer. In this way, the
HRA can compare the financial implications of not including the bus garage property at
this time.
5
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION - Public hearing - Kunz/Lewis Redevelopment
October 19, 1999
Page six
TRAFFIC
In accordance with your request, BRW completed a preliminary evaluation of each
proposal with respect to their impacts on traffic operations in the Grandview area. Their
report is attached. BRW's opinion is that none of the proposals will create traffic
generations which result in unacceptable levels of service for this area. BRW notes that
this conclusion is based upon certain traffic related improvements that have always been
contemplated for this area including:
• Providing a three lane cross section for Eden Avenue. (This can be
accomplished through restriping and does not necessitate major
reconstruction.)
• Prohibiting left turns from Link Road into the service stations.
BRW also opines that a four lane cross section to Eden Avenue is not needed and is not
desirable from a traffic engineering standpoint. They also note that a second means of
ingress and egress into the Richmond Hills neighborhood is desirable due to the potential
for congestion at the Sherwood/Link intersection during the P.M. peak hour.
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
Ehler's & Associates, our finance consultant, has prepared the attached analysis based
upon the information contained in each proposal as well as information obtained during
our meetings with each developer. This analysis:
• Compares the estimated market value of each development
• Compares the proposed sources and uses of funds for the proposed
public improvements and TIF eligible development costs
• Compares the feasibility of each proposal with respect to the ability of
the Grandview TIF district to amortize eligible development costs
Mr. Fifield of Ehlers will be available at the October 19`b, meeting to present his findings.
6
`9 10/11/99 MON 09:16 FAX 612 340 7800
lot
t
TO: City of Edina
FROM: Jerry P. Gilligan
Steven K. Champlin
Philip Bnelter
DORSEY & WHITNEY
MEMORANDUM
DATE: February 10, 1997
RE: Executive Summary of Steps Which Must be Taken by a Condemning
Authority in a Condemnation
We understand that the City of Edina is considering taking through its power of
eminent domain the Lewis Engineering property and The Kunz Oil Company property.
Th.e steps the City of Edina would be required to take to condemn the parcel through its
power of eminent domain are set forth below.
1. Hire An Appraiser.
Under the federal and state constitutions and under Minnesota law, a
condemning authority is required to pay the owner of a condemned parcel its damages
resulting from the taking. In general, damages are equal to the market value of the
property as of the date it is taken by the condemning authority. The measure of
compensation is the amount which a purchaser willing, but not required, to buy the
property would pay -to an owner willing, but not required, to sell it, taking into
consideration the highest and best use to which the property can be put. Thub, it is
critical to select an appraiser to act as the city's expert in the course of the condemnation
proceedings.
2. 1--fire Other Experts Needed to Evaluate the Property to be Condemned.
In addition to hiring an appraiser, the city should also hire other professional
consultants to assist the appraiser in determining the market value of the property to be
taken and to evaluate the property to identify potential problems that may defeat the
purpose of the taking. Some or all of the following types of consultants may need to be
hired for the purposes; indicated:
Engineers -- to estimate the costs of utilities and roads which may be
needed. consistent with the plans of the city.
Surveyors -- to accurately measure the land area being appraised.
DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP
Z002
0/11/99 MON 09:17 FAX 612 340 7600 DORSEY & WHITNEY
"W1 .1
• Realtors /brokers -- to assist in current market information on leasing, sale
activity, or general market supply and demand factors.
• Environmental consultant -- to identify any environmental problem which
may require remediation on the property.
• Geotechnical experts -- to identify other potential problems with the
property, such as suitability of soil for building or whether the property is
located in a flood plain.
3. Determine Whether a Taking is Desirable.
After receiving the appraiser's report indicating what the city m.ay have to pay
for the taking, and after receiving the reports of the other consultants, the city must
decide whether a taking would be desirable and consistent with its goals.
If the city determines that condemning the property is in its best intere t, the
steps set out below must be taken.
4. Prepare and file Petition With Hennepin County District Court.
The petition is a pleading in which the condemning authority (also known as
"the Petitioner" in this context) asks the court for permission to go ahead with a
condemnation. It describes the property to be taken, the purpose for the taking, and the
names of all record owners, lien holders or other parties known to the condemning
authority to have an interest in the property, including tenants, parties possessing
easements and parties to purchase agreements or option agreements. The petition is
filed with the Hennepin County District Court and must be served upon all persons
with an interest in the`property. The petition requests the appointment of three
commissioners to view the property and determine the damages to each party who has
an interest in the property. Usually the condemning authority files a lis pendens with
the county recorder describing the petition and property to be taken. The purpose of
the lis pendens is to put all persons with an interest in the property, as well as the
public, on notice that a condemnation is pending.
5. On a date at least 20 days after service of the petition, the Hennepin
County District Court hears evidence in support of or against the granting of the
petition. The city must show at the hearing that the taking is necessary and authorized
by statute. Owners will often assert that the property is not being taken for a public
purpose but this argument rarely succeeds. The vast majority of petitions axe granted
by the district court.
-2-
DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP
16 003 t
t
10/11/99 MON 09:17 FAX f612 390 800 DORSEY & WHITNEY Z004
i
4 �
6. If the petition is granted, the judge appoints three commissioners and. two
al.temate commissioners and sets out by order the first date they are to meet. Their
function is to determir -te the damages which will be sustained by the owners upon the
taking of the property.; The commissioners must have no interest in the property to be
taken and be residents �:)f the county where the property is situated.
7. The Comm "ssioners Determine the Damages Which Will be Sustained b
the Owners of the Proper. )�.
The duty of the commissioners is to make a separate assessment and award of
the damages which in their judgment will result to each of the owners of the property
by reason of the taking and to report their assessment to the district court. By :statute,
the report of the commissioners must be filed within 90 days of the date of the order
appointing the commissioners, but this deadline is subject to extension by the court
upon inotion of the Petitioner. The commissioners have the following powers and
duties:
To view the premises involved in the proceeding.
• To take public testimony from witnesses under oath.
• To subpoena witnesses.
• To require the Petitioner or owner to furnish maps, plats and other
information bearing upon the nature of the property and the proposed
undertaking.
• To make, without unreasonable delay, a separate assessment and award
of damages they believe will result to each of the owners of the land by
reason of taking.
• To show in their report, when requested, an express finding of the
estimated cost of removal and remedial actions that will be necessary on
the taken property because of existing environmental contamination.
• To reserve, in proper cases, to the owner a right of way or other privilege
in and over the land taken.
• To allow'-and show separately, in their discretion, a reimbursement to the
owners of reasonable appraisal fees not to exceed a total of $500.
-3-
DORSE-Y & WHITNEY LLP'
10/11./99 MON 09:17 FAX 612 340 7500 DORSEY & WHITNEY
Note: By statute, the condemnor can acquire possession of the property prior to the
award of the commissioners. This so called "quick- take" procedure requires the
condemnor to give the owner 90 days prior notice that possession is to be taken and to
pay to the owner or deposit with the court an amount equal to Petitioner's approved
appraisal of value.
8. The Viewing.
The commission ers will set up a time to view the property to be taken and will
issue notices of viewing to all interested parties. The right of way agent or engineer or
other person primarily responsible for overseeing the taking should be present and
have copy of maps to objectively describe the nature and extent of the taking. The
attorney for the condemning authority and the attorney for the land owner should be
present at the viewing with sufficient information about their availability and that of
witnesses to enable an evidentiary hearing to be scheduled.
9. Commissioners' Hearings.
After the viewing, the commissioners will schedule a hearing or hearings at
which evidence will be adduced relating to the value of the property to be taken. There
may be more than one,hearing. In Hennepin County, the conduct of the commissioners
is governed by a set of proposed guidelines and rules.
10. Post - Hearing Procedures.
After the hearing or hearings are closed, the commissioners will meet one or
more times in private to make the award of damages. The report of commissioners
must be filed with the district court within 90 days after the court appoints th(-m, unless
the court extends the deadline upon motion of the Petitioner. Within ten days after the
filing of the report, the Petitioner must notify each owner and attorney of the :award by
mail.
11. Appeal of Commissioner's Award.
At any time within 40 days from the date that the commissioners' report is filed
with the district court, any party to the proceedings may appeal to the district court
from any award of damages embraced in the report, or from any omission. to award
damages, by filing with the court administrator a notice of such appeal and mailing a
copy of such notice to all parties of record having an interest in lands described in the
appeal. Even if the commissioners' award is appealed, the condemnor can immediately
acquire title and possession of the property by paying or depositing with the court
three - fourths of the award. Any party to the appeal is entitled to request a jury trial.
-4-
DORSEY & WHITNEY Lf.P
16005
r
10/11/99 MON 09:18 FAX 612 390 7800 DORSEY & WHITNEY
relocation assistance could add an additional element of costs to the taking. We do not
know at this time whether the owner and occupant of The Kunz Oil Company property
will qualify for relocation assistance from the City or what such relocation assistance, if
any, will cost. We will need to review these matters further.
DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP
-.b -
Z007
P
FOR ACTION
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 273
Regular Meeting, October 11, 1999
Volume 71, Report 99b
SUBJECT: POTENTIAL BUS GARAGE RELOCATION
Be it Resolved, That
The Board of Education
Affirm that the following five items are in
existence in any forthcoming bus garage relocation
agreement.
1. The relocation, i.e., the demolition of the
existing facility including any and all
environmental assessments and corrective
actions and construction of new facility,
will be of no cost to the school district.
2. The relocation will occur within the same
geographical area of Edina.
3. The new facility will provide adequate indoor
space for the storage, maintenance, and
repair of our entire vehicle fleet and our
transportation services' offices which need
to be handicapped accessible. .
4. The relocation will cause no delay in our
daily operations.
5. The school district shall continue to have
fueling privileges at the city's fueling
site.
195c
MINUTES
OF THE JOINT MEETING
OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
AND THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL
HELD AT CITY HALL
OCTOBER 5, 1999 - 7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly
and Chair Maetzold.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made
seconded by Commissioner Johnson approving
presented.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold
Motion carried.
by Commissioner Kelly and
the Consent Agenda as
*MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND
REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FOR SEPTEMBER 21, 1999, AND THE
SEPTEMBER 28 1999, SPECIAL MEETING APPROVED Motion made by
Commissioner Kelly and seconded by Commissioner Johnson approving the
Minutes of the September 21, 1999, Regular Meeting and the September 28, 1999,
Special Meeting.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
KUNZ /LEWIS REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT DISCUSSED Chair Maetzold explained
at the HRA meeting on September 21, 1999, directed staff to meet with the final four
proposers for the Kunz/Lewis site. The four proposers were encouraged to supply
financial statements and traffic impacts, as well as elaborate on their proposals. At the
hearing October 19, 1999, neighbors will be allowed to give testimony about the project.
Chair Maetzold suggested HRA questions should frame the issues of the project with
points of clarification.
Commissioner Faust suggested having a time schedule and decision date in mind to
keep everyone on schedule.
Director Hughes explained if developers were selected on October 19, two months
would be available to negotiate details and draft a letter of intent for Council
consideration. The consideration should not go much beyond December 19, 1999. He
reminded the HRA that Edinborough took five years to complete a redevelopment
agreement.
Commissioner Faust asked how much lead time the City needs to submit information to
the State. Director Hughes noted that nothing needs to be submitted to the State. The
December 31, 1999, deadline is a matter of law and adequate records need to be
maintained showing that action was taken on the matter, according to the date specified
N
in_the_Statute.Chair Maetzold added the letter of intent must be in place by December
31, 1999. --
Commissioner Johnson said he personally would rather make a decision at the
November 1, 1999, meeting after absorbing the presentations at the October 19, 1999,
meeting. Commissioner Kelly concurred.
Chair Maetzold voiced concern that reaching a consensus at a regular meeting may not
be reasonable and therefore setting a special meeting date would be prudent.
Commissioner Hovland asked how , the financial analysis is going with- individual
developers. Director Hughes said meetings have -been scheduled with the four finalists
within the next week.
Commissioner Kelly asked that due. diligence be done via a two step analysis; 1)
executive summary for, financial strength, and 2) tax increment generated by the
proposal.
Chair Maetzold noted that the developers.may be reluctant to make their balance sheet
public as in essence they are private organizations. He suggested one method would
be to have the financials submitted to the City Attorney for an analysis and provide the
Council with a summary of the strength of the proponents.
Commissioner Hovland stated he favored a special meeting being called.
HRA consensus was to set the special meeting at 6:30 P.M., October 26, 1999, the
location to be announced.
Commissioner Faust asked if neighborhood comments should be taken into account
now or after January 1. Director Hughes said testimony need not be taken into account
regarding the site plan before January 1, 2000.
Commissioner Hovland submitted written questions stating seven points he developed
that could be used for consideration in selecting 'a developer; 1) risk benefit analysis, 2)
financial matters; 3) concept, 4) land use,,5) mass, 6) aesthetics, and 7) timing.
Commissioner Faust inquired whether, when the financial analysis is being done, the
financials could be compared or would it be easier to set the scope previous to the
analysis. Manager Hughes stated all the proposals seem to have the same basic
concept after meeting with Ehlers and Associates representative. The proposals all
reflect different levels of public assistance as well as financing concepts with respect to
that assistance. Staff should be able to show how they compare and contrast with one
another.
Commissioner Kelly summarized; October 19 hold a public hearing; October 26,
workshop;,and November 1, decision made on developer.
E
le
Correspondence was received from Gene Haugland, Haugland Company Real Estate
Development, withdrawing their proposal from the finalists. The Marriott Life Care
Community proposal would not be feasible because of timing and the necessity of pre -
commitments from buyers.
No HRA action was taken.
RESOLUTION ADOPTED ORDERING WEST 49 '/2 STREET PARKING RAMP
IMPROVEMENT NO. P-4a AND GRANTING VARIANCE FROM SETBACK Affidavits
of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file.
Engineering presentation
Mr. Hoffman explained the Council and the HRA conducted a joint hearing on
September 7, 1999, to consider constructing additional parking spaces on the north
ramp at 501h & France. Since September 7, 1999, staff and consultants have reviewed
the project.
Staff, after reviewing the alternatives, recommended an alternative the uses only the
Lee property and existing ramp property. The primary reasons for not using the Hooten
Cleaners site were; 1) private property, 2) relocation of a business, and 3) impact upon
more residential properties. The USBank site was rejected for similar reasons.
Mr. Hoffman added the "Clancy" surface lot was examined as well because it is a more
centralized location. However Clancy's lot provide a low net gain of spaces, limited truck
access, limited site, eliminate storefront visibility and disrupt centralized existing parking
during construction. He noted that staff has over the past been made aware of the
desire to have some non - structured open parking by businesses for customer who do
not wish to park in a ramp.
Mr. Hoffman reported he met with the neighbors on September 27, 1999, to discuss
options ranging from "no build ": to "full- build" options. The results of the meeting were:
• Additional ramp expansion not justified at this time. Three traffic counts
indicate many open spaces
• Adjacent property owners prefer no further encroachments on their property,
i.e., visually or on their site
• Do not favor City purchasing properties and reselling to new owners
• Business activity is encroaching upon residential neighbors
• Ramp expansion has negative effect on property values
• Staff has received a packet from the neighborhood which opposes the ramp
expansion
He stated potential options that might provide mitigation for the project include:
• Home improvements to the four adjacent residential properties similar to
some of the Metropolitan Airports Commission relating to the Minneapolis /St.
Paul Airport
K1
• Residential landscape easements and landscaping
• Ramp modifications setting back some sections of the north ramp wall
allowing for landscaping or design elements enhancing the north side view
• Providing sound mitigation activities on the interior ramp walls
Mr. Hoffman concluded that a ramp expansion would increase parking spaces by
approximately 90 spaces to 110 spaces if the project were approved. Final design and
mitigation concepts would be developed after the project is approved. Staff would
expect the 50" & France Business area to finance any additional expenses occurring
north of the north ramp.
Council comments
Commissioner /Member Kelly asked where funds would come from for landscaping and
purchase of the easement. Mr. Hoffman said the funds would come from the special
assessments.
Commissioner /Member Faust said after cutting out the corner, how would the corner be
restored. Mr. Hoffman described the landscape plan in detail. Member Faust asked
further about the cedar fence. Mr. Hoffman explained the fencing would be for privacy
concerns.
Chair /Mayor Maetzold asked whether the heavy landscaping would be in lieu of the
improvements similar to the Metropolitan Airport improvements. Mr. Hoffman said the
most feasible approach would be to soundproof the homes. He does not know whether
this would be approved by the neighborhood.
Commissioner /Member Johnson asked if the ramp is approved would there be a broad
enough resolution to achieve the desired outcome. Mr. Hoffman said if the neighbors
were to file a claim against the City we would have to settle it.
Director Hughes reminded the Council that what is being sought is authorization of the
project with the notch removed and including direction to staff to pursue mitigation, and
the landscaping plan. If neighbors did not want the landscaping, the City would not want
to condemn the property to landscape.
Commissioner /Member Hovland inquired whether a mechanism exists to fund lawsuits
if they were to occur., Mr. Hughes said the total project is partially funded with tax
increments as well as assessments. Ultimately the project would be back before the
Council during an assessment hearing and the cost split decided upon at that time. He
cautioned that the north property line of the ramp is the boundary of the tax increment
district. Therefore, it would be difficult to spend tax increment funds to the north. Staff
would recommend that the cost split be shifted more to the assessment.
Commissioner /Member Hovland asked what the cost per stall in the ramp is at today.
Mr. Hoffman said there would be no change to the cost estimate as previously
proposed.
4
Commissioner /Member Faust asked if the tax increment funds were coming from all of
Edina. Mr. Hughes explained that tax increments come from taxes generated from the
TIF District. These funds are not available for use by the City, School District and the
County. Therefore they may only be used by the City to fund public improvements in
this district. It could be argued that since those dollars are captured in this district, it
forces the remainder of the community to pay higher taxes than would otherwise be
paid. The converse. of the argument is without the tax increment district, the
development may not have occurred in the first place and therefore, the extra taxes
would be a moot point.
Resident comments
Bill Sleds, representing the commercial corner at 501h & France, voiced his opinion that
a ramp addition is necessary.
John Smaby, Manager of Edina Realty Office adjacent to the parking ramp, stated while
they are sympathetic to homeowners, being in the realty business, this ramp is
necessary for the growth of the 501h & France area. If the ramp is not built, parking will
begin spilling into the neighborhood. He concluded that every day the ramp is full.
Gail Dean, 3925 West 491h Street, commented she was appalled when she surveyed
the ramp and found 68 spaces open in the middle ramp; and 34 in the north ramp.
What she finds is rude people who find it an inconvenience to not park directly next to
where they are going. She suggested reducing the number of 90 minute signs to open
up longer parking times. Ms. Dean said the pictures are deceiving and she is totally
against the ramp addition. She believes a survey should be done of the neighbors and
further believes the easement will not be sufficient.
Kathleen Godfrey, 3938 West 491h Street, and a member of the 501h & France Business
Association, said she had submitted a letter dated September 30, 1999, minutes from a
meeting held September 24, 1999, and a petition with numerous signatures affixed.
She stated the need for additional parking has not been substantiated. The ramp
expansion and variance is not an option for the neighborhood.
Lee Wiseman, 4229 Chowen, owner of Fashion Avenue at 4936 France Avenue, stated
the area does need the parking.
Shawna Engelsma, owners of Spalon Montage, said the area has a parking problem.
She added they receive complaints often about no parking spots. She voiced concern
that people will go elsewhere if they can't find a place to park their car.
Pat Tucker, 4705 Upper Terrace, representing the Edina Chamber of Commerce at
7701 Normandale Road, read the position statement submitted by the Chamber dated
September 27, 1999, unanimously supporting the proposal to increase vehicle capacity
of the north ramp at 50" and France from their August 26, 1999, board meeting.
6
__Mart_y_Rud,_6222 France Avenue South, elaborated that between 1991 and 1996 the
City began surveying the. ramp for potential expansion. Businessowners. at 50th &
France request this expansion and encourage the Council's approval.
Roberta Castellano, 4854 France Avenue South, read her submitted letter that her
neighbors should be given credit for their concerns and are not an opposition- without-
cause group. Her letter asked numerous questions about the ramp expansion project.
Richard Cochrane, 3922 West 49th Street, stated that anything higher than two stories
would dominate the neighborhood, much like Uptown, and he does not believe that is
what 50th & France wants to be. He suggested building a ramp over Clancy's lot or the
USBank location.
Barbara Zwack; of Chico's on the corner of 501h & France, acknowledged that change is
difficult but it is very important to keep parking within the commercial district.
Jan Monson, 3945 West 491h Street, inquired of Mr. Rud when, in his estimation, peak
times happen. Mr. Rud responded 11:00 A.M,. to 2:00 P.M. She said the most desirable
parking lot is the Talbot's lot and people want to park there leaving other spots empty.
She voiced concern with the proposed plantings and the work it will take to keep them
acceptable. Ms. Monson concluded that her hope is the Council decision to build the
ramp is not based on pressure to spend the tax increment funds on 105 115 new
parking spaces.
Karen Knudsen, - Executive Director of the 501h & France Association, voiced assurance
to the Council that the Association spends fa great deal of time attempting to manage
parking as efficiently as possible and remain good neighbors to the neighborhood. In
1999, over 800 parking permits were sold. They are told repeatedly that the #1 concern
in the area is parking in trying to maintain the vitality of the business district. She said
the Association would very much appreciate more parking availability.
Correspondence was received from Mitchell J. Avery, President of dana's, stating it
appears.the site as proposed is the most ideal site for an expansion or addition to
parking in the area; and from Thomas M. Nelson, President, Eberhardt Properties, Inc.,
supporting the ramp addition as an intelligent continuation of a model infrastructrue that
will benefit the 501h and France area owners and neighbors for many years to come.
Commissioner /Member Kelly made a motion to close the public hearing,
Commissioner /Member Johnson seconded the motion.
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold
Motion carried.
Council Comment
Chair Maetzold said staff has recommended to proceed with the ramp and give staff the
authority to work with the neighbors regarding landscaping, home improvements and
related matters.
D
Commissioner /Member Kelly stated he believes the proposal is good under the
circumstances. He voiced concern with the difference of opinion of whether we need
the parking ramp now. Mr. Hoffman said each day is different. Mr. Kelly said this is a
difficult situation and staff has handled it well in attempting to mitigate the concern. He
said further he has never seen such a generous mitigation plan. This is a very important
area for Edina. The Council has turned down expansive plans in the 50th & France area
in the past, in an attempt to keep growth at a reasonable level and this ramp expansion
proposal is important to protect the vitality of the area. Mr. Kelly concluded starting on
this project sooner rather than later is appropriate. He reminded the neighbors they
bought their homes near a commercial district with its risks and rewards and
encouraged the neighbors to work with the plan.
Commissioner /Member Faust said she too had surveyed the area and found various
states of fullness in the ramp. She said while she sympathizes with the neighbors she
supports the proposal going forward.
Commissioner /Member Hovland said this is one of those judgement calls the Council is
elected to make. He indicated it is not easy to live next to a commercial area with no
buffer but despite that, he believes 491h Street to be a nice street. He looks at the area
as a balancing act between private property and the business community. The Council
must balance the interests of both. Mr. Hovland said he believes staff has done a great
job with this solution. He would vote to expand the ramp.
Commissioner /Member Johnson said in his short tenure on the Council, he has been
asked what he has learned. He responded that residents speaking before the Council
are articulate and with passionate convictions. After much thought, he said he would
support the ramp expansion.
Chair Maetzold concurs with the Council. He stated there are key stakeholders, i.e.
residents and business community. The Council needs to control the growth in the area
and maintain it as a vibrant shopping area. He voiced his support for the ramp
expansion.
Commissioner /Member Faust asked when construction would begin. Mr. Hoffman said
construction should begin in the spring and be completed by fall of the year 2000.
Commissioner /Member Kelly made a motion closing the hearing for ramp
expansion P-4a, the north ramp at 50' & France. Commissioner /Member Johnson
seconded the motion
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold
Motion carried.
CLAIMS PAID Commissioner Hovland made a motion approving payment of the
following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated September 29,
7
1-999—and–consisting–of-one–page , – totaling,– $ 130 ,01.5.95._Commissioner_Faust_
seconded the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold
Motion carried.
There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, Chair Maetzold declared the
meeting adjourned at 7:25 P.M.
Executive Director
0
B RW
A DAMES & MOORE GROUP COMPANY
DATE: October 15, 1999
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Gordon Hughes
City of Edina
Howard Preston, PE
Craig Rasmussen, EIT
Grandview Area Redevelopment
Traffic Analysis Update
Thresher Square
700 Third Street South
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415
612 370 0700 Tel
612 370 1378 Fax
,,v-,vw.brsvinc.com
We have completed the update of the traffic analysis of the Grandview Area as you
requested. The objective of the analysis was to document the expected traffic generation
associated with the four alternative development proposals that are being considered by
the City and to contrast the potential traffic impacts at key locations in the immediate
area.
The traffic analysis consisted of the tasks listed below, which are summarized, in the
following paragraphs.
Work Tasks
1. Documenting the type and intensity of the land uses proposed by each of the
developers.
2. Documenting the expected traffic generation associated with each of the
development alternatives.
3. Calculating expected post- development traffic forecasts.
4. Determining the Level of Service (an estimate of the quality of traffic operations)
at the Vernon Avenue/Link Road and Eden Avenue /Arcadia Avenue intersections
and on the segment of Eden Avenue.
5. Identifying any traffic operational deficiencies.
6. Contrasting the results of this analysis to those documented in the 1993 analysis
of the area.
Type and Intensity of Land Use
The type and intensity of the land uses contained in the four alternative development
proposals is summarized in Tables IA and 1B. The land uses common to all of the
alternatives consist of residential, library and a senior center. Other land uses include
office, retail, restaurant and hotel.
Grandview Area Update 1 October 15, 1999
Offices Worldwide
Traffic Generation
The expected traffic generation associated with each of the development proposals was
calculated based on the type and intensity of the proposed land uses and typical trip
generation rates documented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation
Manual (6`h Edition). The expected,traffic generation for each of the alternatives is
documented in Tables 2A, 2B, 2C and 2D. A comparative summary of the trip
generation is documented in Table 2E and indicates the following:
The daily traffic generation ranges from a low of 3,150 trips per day (Stuart
Companies) to a high of 4,950 trips per day (Franuenshuh Companies).
The PM peak hour trip generation ranges from a low of 350 trips per hour. (Stuart
Companies) to a high of 608 trips per hour (Frauenshuh Companies).
It should be noted that the differences in trip generation are due to the various mixes of
type and intensity of land uses associated with each of the development alternatives.
Traffic Forecasts
Daily and peak hour traffic forecasts were prepared for each of the development
alternatives. These forecasts were calculated by adding site - generated traffic to existing
traffic volumes in accordance with a specified directional distribution. The existing
traffic volumes were taken from the 1993 Grandview Area Traffic Study Update and then
increased by approximately 2% per year to account for growth in the study area. The
directional orientation was also taken from the 1993 Update.
The daily forecasts are documented in Table 3 and indicated that the volume of traffic on
Eden Avenue is expected to increase form the current 4,000 vehicles per day to between
7,000 and 9,000 vehicles per day, depending on the development alternative.
The PM peak hour forecasts were calculated in the same way as the daily forecasts and
are documented in Tables 4A, 413, 4C and 4D -1 and 2.
The expected increase in hourly traffic volumes at the two key intersections, associated
with each of the development alternatives is documented in Table4E. This information
suggests that the expected increase at the Vernon Avenue/Link Road intersection is in the
range of 13% to 22% and 8% to 13% at the Eden Avenue /Arcadia Avenue intersection.
Quality of Traffic Operations
Traffic engineers estimate the quality of traffic operations at intersections and along
segments of urban arterials by calculating the Level of Service (LOS) using the
procedures in the Highway Capacity Manual. The LOS is a letter grade ranging from A
to F, with LOS A and B being a very good quality of traffic operations with very little
Grandview Area Update 2 October 15, 1999
congestion, LOS C and D indicating the onset of congestion and LOS E and F being a
very poor quality of traffic operations with very high levels of congestion.
LOS is a function of traffic volume, roadway geometry and intersection traffic control.
The traffic volumes used in the LOS analysis were documented in Tables 3 and 4 and the
intersection geometry and traffic control at the two key intersections are documented in
Table 5.
The results of the LOS analysis are documented in Table 6 and indicate the following:
* The two key intersections (Vernon Avenue/Link Road and Eden Avenue /Arcadia
Avenue) operate at LOS B with existing traffic volumes.
* With post - development traffic volumes the quality of traffic operations at Vernon
Avenue/Link Road should stay at LOS B and the operations at Eden
Avenue /Arcadia Avenue should drop to LOS C.
* Traffic operations on two -lane Eden Avenue with current traffic volumes is a
LOS A. However, in the post - development condition, the LOS would be
expected to drop to the C/D range (depending on the development alternative).
Traffic Operational Deficiencies
The results of the traffic operations analysis suggests that the basic geometric design
features and traffic control at the key intersections are sufficient to provide an acceptable
quality of traffic operations in the post - development condition. However, the level of
congestion along two -lane Eden Avenue is expected to increase substantially. Additional
analysis suggests that providing three -lane lanes on Eden Avenue (one through lane in
each direction and a center left turn lane) would improve traffic operations to
approximately current conditions.
Comparison to 1993 Traffic Study Update
The final task consisted of providing a comparison of the results of this analysis to the
results documented in the 1993 Traffic Study Update. The key comparisons are
illustrated in Table 7 and suggest the following:
* The highest traffic generation studied in the 1993 Update was 11,300 trips per day
versus a maximum of 4,950 in the current analysis.
* The documented levels of traffic operations in the 1993 Update are virtually
identical to the results of the current analysis.
* The results of both analyses suggest that major improvements to the area road
system are not required. However, the 1993 Update identified a number of minor
improvements and the results of this analysis indicate that they are still warranted.
These minor improvements include:
Grandview Area Update 3 October 15, 1999
Restricting driveway access to Link Road by constructing a raised median
in order to eliminate turning conflicts that would be both hazardous and a
significant impediment to mobility.
Extending the west bound left turn lane on Vernon Avenue in order to
better accommodate the increased number of left turning vehicles onto
Link Road and to minimize the chances of left turning traffic queuing out
of the left turn lane and blocking through traffic on Vernon.
Creating a three -lane operation on Eden Avenue in order to better
accommodate post - development traffic volumes, minimize congestion and
increase safety. Simply changing the pavement markings on the existing
roadway would likely be acceptable for the short term. However,
consideration should be given to widening the roadway to the 44 -48 foot
range to better serve long -term traffic growth.
Significant amounts of development related traffic Is Not expected to
travel through the Sherwood Road neighborhood. However, the growth in
traffic on Eden Avenue could make access to /from the neighborhood more
difficult. As a result, consideration should be given to providing two lanes
of approach on Sherwood Road at Link Road (in order to minimize delay
for vehicles turning right) and in the long term to create a second access
into and out of the neighborhood.
Conclusions
The final conclusions of this traffic analysis update are as follows:
* The traffic generation associated with the four current alternative development
proposals should not result in significant traffic impacts in the study area.
* The recommendations for minor system improvements documented in the 1993
Traffic Update are still valid and should be considered for implementation.
* The increase in forecast traffic volumes on Eden Avenue (up to a maximum of
approximately 9,000 vehicles per day) is sufficient to consider widening the
roadway in order to provide a three -lane operation. However, there is still
sufficient reserve capacity (several existing three -lane roadways in the
Metropolitan Area currently serve over 20,000 vehicles per day) such that it does
not appear necessary to reserve right -of -way for a future widening of Eden
Avenue to four - lanes.
Grandview Area Update 4 October 15, 1999
Table 1A
Summary of Development Alternatives by Size
Grandview Area Traffic Study, Edina, Minnesota
Source: City of Edina and BRW, Inc.
P; Q1-rY OF
EDINA
compare.xis(UseSize) 10/14/1999
Develo ment Alternative
Developer
Office
Bus Gara a
Residential
Library
Senior Ctr.
Rail Station
Retail
Restaurant
Hotel
Frauenshuh Companies p
128,200
40,000
Dwe 5 g
21,000
12,000
(none)
14,000
8,000
(none)
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
Units
190
Ron Clark Construction and
80,000
42,000
Dwelling
20,000
15,000
(none)
(none)
(none)
(none)
Opus Northwest
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
Units
Jerry's Enterprises, Laukka-
64,000
40,000
210 Dwelling
20,000
14,400
6,500
20,000
(none)
(none)
Jarvis and Namron Company
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
S.F.
Units
40,000
140 to 180
20,000
15,000
103
Stuart Companies
(none)
S.F.
Dwelling
S.F.
S.F.
(none)
(none)
(none)
Rooms
Units
Source: City of Edina and BRW, Inc.
P; Q1-rY OF
EDINA
compare.xis(UseSize) 10/14/1999
rA R II Il •t r i
ill �� -- ' n . - r. � �� • -1 P . '• S. _
_ p =
� I E"oTM,s la lb I.
I '
J Jj
FIRST '
o rt Ir
1
PLATEAU F ,A c �. well. : c )
CL
_ z
O
Q; F w
t Z
' (�;) - o
L� led
�� Subject Prop rty
0 41
�'1• i
•.� K Lt � i-�L t,�l` •�f� �SL� ^' {� l
� f � I � i
�a)
?•
I
D
iR
(tu
—
W
2
N
� r
I
41 I
(Ta)
t
(1�)
MR 71
Table 1B
Comparison of Land Use Alternatives
Grandview Area Traffic Study, Edina, Minnesota
Source: City of Edina and BRW, Inc.
* Sites denoted by asterisk are locations of existing trip generators, where no net gain in trips generated would occur
;-; CC�INA
compare.xis(LandUse) 10/14/1999
Parcel Identification
and
Develo ment
Developer
la
lb
2
3
4
5
6
7
Central Area
Library and
Library and
Library and
Frauenshuh Companies
Office
Office
Bus Garage
Residential
Senior
Senior
Senior
Bus Garage
Office
Center
Center
Center
Library an
Ron Clark Construction and
Bus Garage
Bus Garage
(none)
Residential
Office
Residential
Residential
(none)
Senior
Opus Northwest
Center
Library,
Senior
Jerry's Enterprises, Laukka-
Office and
Office and
(none)
Residential
(none) ,�
(none)
(none)
(none)
Center and
Jarvis and Namron Company
Retail
Retail
Railroad
Station
Library,
Library,
Stuart Companies
p
none
(none)
(none)
(none)
Residential
Senior
(none) *
Senior
(none)
Hotel
Center and
Center and
Bus Garage
Bus Garage
Source: City of Edina and BRW, Inc.
* Sites denoted by asterisk are locations of existing trip generators, where no net gain in trips generated would occur
;-; CC�INA
compare.xis(LandUse) 10/14/1999
Table 2A
Trip Generation for Development by Frauenshuh Companies
Grandview Area Traffic Study, Edina, Minnesota
Source: TTE Trip Generation Manual, 6th Edition, by BRW, Inc.
Notes:
1. No daily rate available - rate for "High -Rise Residential Condominium / Townhouse" used for daily rate
2. No weekday rate available - rate for Saturday used for daily rate
3. Rate based on estimate of capacity by City of Edina and assumes 10% peak hour percentage
tiipgen.xls(Frauenshuh) 10/14/1999
Total Daily Trips
PM Peak Hour
Proposed Development
Size
Unit
Rate
per
unit
Estimated Daily
Trips
Rate
per
unit
Inbound
%
Outbound
%
Estimated Estimated
Inbound Outbound
Trips Trips
General Office Building
128,200
S.F.
11.01
1,411
1.49
17%
83%
32
159
Specialty Retail Center
14,000
S.F.
40.67
569
4.93
57%
43%
39
30
Quality Restaurant
8,000
S.F.
89.95
720
7.49
67%
33%
40
20
Luxury Condominiums
115
D.U.
4.18
481
0.55
63%
37%
40
23
Library
21,000
S.F.
54.0
1,134
7.09
48%
52%
71
77
Senior Center 2
12,000
S.F.
9.1
109
1.75
34%
66%
7
14
Community Building 2
3,000
S.F.
9.1
27
1.75
34%
66%
2
3
Bus Garage 3
40,000
S.F.
500
50
0
F ESTIMATED TOTAL TRIP GENERATION
4,950 I
I
282
326
Source: TTE Trip Generation Manual, 6th Edition, by BRW, Inc.
Notes:
1. No daily rate available - rate for "High -Rise Residential Condominium / Townhouse" used for daily rate
2. No weekday rate available - rate for Saturday used for daily rate
3. Rate based on estimate of capacity by City of Edina and assumes 10% peak hour percentage
tiipgen.xls(Frauenshuh) 10/14/1999
Table 2B
Trip Generation for Development by Ron Clark Construction and Opus Northwest
Grandview Area Traffic Study, Edina, Minnesota
Source: ITE Trip Generation Manual, 6th Edition, by BRW, Inc.
Notes:
1. No daily rate available - rate for "High -Rise Residential Condominium / Townhouse" used for daily rate
2. No weekday rate available - rate for Saturday used for daily rate
3. Rate based on estimate of capacity by City of Edina and assumes 10% peak hour percentage
EDNA
tripgen.xls(Opus) 10/14/1999
Total Daily Trips
PM Peak Hour
Proposed Development
Size
Unit
Rate
per
unit
Estimated Daily
Trips
Rate
per
unit
Inbound
%
Outbound
%
Estimated Estimated
Inbound Outbound
Trips Trips
General Office Building
80,000
S.F.
11.01
881
1.49
17%
83%
20
99
Luxury Condominiums
190
D.U.
4.18
794
0.55
63%
37%
66
39
Library
20,000
S.F.
54.0
1,080
7.09
48%
52%
68
74
Senior Center
15,000
S.F.
9.1
137
1.75
34%
66%
9
17
Bus Garage 3
42,000
S.F.
500
50
0
ESTIMATED TOTAL TRIP GENERATION
3,400
213
229
Source: ITE Trip Generation Manual, 6th Edition, by BRW, Inc.
Notes:
1. No daily rate available - rate for "High -Rise Residential Condominium / Townhouse" used for daily rate
2. No weekday rate available - rate for Saturday used for daily rate
3. Rate based on estimate of capacity by City of Edina and assumes 10% peak hour percentage
EDNA
tripgen.xls(Opus) 10/14/1999
Table 2C
Trip Generation for Development by Jerry's Enterprises, Laukka - Jarvis and Namron Company
Grandview Area Traffic Study, Edina, Minnesota
Source: ITE Trip Generation Manual, 6th Edition, by BRW, Inc.
Notes:
1. No daily rate available - rate for "High -Rise Residential Condominium / Townhouse" used for daily rate
2. No weekday rate available - rate for Saturday used for daily rate
3. Generation rate assumes use as a community center. If developed as an office location,
the total number of trips generated would be higher by 12 daily trips,
and lower by 3 trips for the PM peak.
4. Rate based on estimate of capacity by City of Edina and assumes 10% peak hour percentage
CITY OF
EDINA
tripgen.xls(Jerrys) 10/14/1999
Total Daily Trips
PM Peak Hour
Proposed Development
Size
Unit
Rate
per
unit
Estimated Daily
Trips
Rate
per
unit
Inbound
%
Outbound
%
Estimated
Inbound
Trips
Estimated
Outbound
Trips
General Office Building
64,000
S.F.
11.01
705
1.49
17%
83%
16
79
Specialty Retail Center
20,000
S.F.
40.67
813
4.93
57%
43%
56
42
Luxury Condominiums t
210
D.U.
4.18
878
0.55
63%
37%
73
43
Library
20,000
S.F.
54.0
1,080
7.09
48%
52%
68
74
Senior Center 2
14,400
S.F.
9.1
131
1.75
34%
66%
9
17
Railroad Station 2'3
6,500
S.F.
9.1
59
1.75
34%
66%
4
8
Bus Garage 4
40,000
S.F.
500
50
0
ESTIMATED TOTAL TRIP GENERATION
4,150
276
262
Source: ITE Trip Generation Manual, 6th Edition, by BRW, Inc.
Notes:
1. No daily rate available - rate for "High -Rise Residential Condominium / Townhouse" used for daily rate
2. No weekday rate available - rate for Saturday used for daily rate
3. Generation rate assumes use as a community center. If developed as an office location,
the total number of trips generated would be higher by 12 daily trips,
and lower by 3 trips for the PM peak.
4. Rate based on estimate of capacity by City of Edina and assumes 10% peak hour percentage
CITY OF
EDINA
tripgen.xls(Jerrys) 10/14/1999
Table 2D
Trip Generation for Development by Stuart Companies - Options 1 and 2
Grandview Area Traffic Study, Edina, Minnesota
Source: ITE Trip Generation Manual, 6th Edition, by BRW, Inc.
Notes:
1. No daily rate available - rate for "High -Rise Residential Condominium / Townhouse" used for daily rate
2. No weekday rate available - rate for Saturday used for daily rate
3. Rate based on estimate of capacity by City of Edina and assumes 10% peak hour percentage
tripgen.xls(Staurt) 10/14/1999
Total Daily Trips
PM Peak Hour
Proposed Development
Size
Unit
Rate
per
unit
Estimated Daily
Trips
Rate
per
unit
Inbound Outbound
% %
Estimated Estimated
Inbound Outbound
Trips Trips
OPTION #1
Hotel
103
Rms
8.23
848
0.61
53%
47%
33
30
Luxury Condominiums
140
D.U.
4.18
585
0.55
63%
37%
49
28
Library
20,000
S.F.
54.0
1,080
7.09
48%
52%
68
74
Senior Center Z
15,000
S.F.
9.1
137
1.75
34%
66%
9
17
Bus Garage 3
40,000
S.F.
500
50
0
ESTIMATED TOTAL TRIP GENERATION - Option 1
3,150
209
149
OPTION #2
Add'l Condominiums
40
D.U.
4.18
167
0.55
63%
37%
13.86
8.14
ESTIMATED TOTAL TRIP GENERATION - Option 2
3,300
223
157
Source: ITE Trip Generation Manual, 6th Edition, by BRW, Inc.
Notes:
1. No daily rate available - rate for "High -Rise Residential Condominium / Townhouse" used for daily rate
2. No weekday rate available - rate for Saturday used for daily rate
3. Rate based on estimate of capacity by City of Edina and assumes 10% peak hour percentage
tripgen.xls(Staurt) 10/14/1999
Table 2E
Summary of Trip Generation (Vehicle Trips) for Development Alternatives '
Grandview Area Traffic Study, Edina, Minnesota
Source: City of Edina and BRW, Inc.
CITY OF
EDINA
compare.xls(TripGeneration) 10/14/1999
PM Peak Hour Trips
Developer
Daily Trips
Inbound
Outbound
Total
Frauenshuh Companies
4,950
282
326
608
Ron Clark Construction and
3,400
213
229
442
Opus Northwest
Jerry's Enterprises, Laukka-
4,150
276
262
538
Jarvis and Namron Company
Stuart Companies
3,150 to 3,300
209 to 223
149 to 157
352 to 380
Source: City of Edina and BRW, Inc.
CITY OF
EDINA
compare.xls(TripGeneration) 10/14/1999
lrrw4achcn Blvd
15%
6%
U u u
F-1 r-1 r-1
aV
Note: Assumes no passby trips.
Source: Vehicle Trace Study of Jerry's
Foods Traffic, BRW,Inc, April 1993.
EDINA
J
May 1993
Expected Directional Distribution
of Retail Traffic
within Grandview Area
13%
YergpnAre (CRIB
r Ave.
10%
0
r%
e
a
Table 3
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) Data
Grandview Area Traffic Study, Edina, Minnesota
Year
Vernon
Avenue
ADT
Eden
Avenue
ADT
Annual
Increase
Percentage
Average
Annaual
Increase
Estimated Current ADT Z
Vernon Avenue
Eden Avenue
Eden Avenue
(Post - Development)
1992
12,500
4,500
0.6%
1994
13,200
4,000
4.0%
1996
14,900
3,700
2.3%
1999
15,900
4,000
7,150 to 8,950
Source: Mn/DOT ADT Flow Maps and BRW, Inc.
Notes:
1. Based on summation of ADT on Vernon Avenue and Eden Avenue for given interval
2. Estimated Current (1999) ADT = 1996 ADT * (1.023) ^3 (years)
tripgen.xls (ADT) 10/14/1999
Table 4A
PM Peak Hour Turning Movements for Development by Frauenshuh Companies
Grandview Area Traffic Study, Edina, Minnesota
Intersection / Scenario
Existing
Traffic Control
North Approach
LT TH RT
East Approach
LT TH RT'
South Approach
LT TH RT
West Approach
LT TH RT
Vernon Avenue/Link Road
Traffic Signal
Existing 1
101
628
11
212
6
88
2
799
186
19
10
13
Site- Generated
79
0
0
153
0
91
0
0
133
0
0
0
Post - Development
180
628
11
365
6
180
2
799
318
19
10
13
Eden Road/Arcadia Avenue
4 -Way STOP
Existing'
100
75
29
47
257
76
23
38
36
14
296
33
Site- Generated
0
0
0
0
48
0
14
0
0
0
55
16
Post - Development
100
75
29
47
305
76
37
38
36
1 14
351
50
Source: BRW, Inc.
Notes:
1. Source: Grandview Area Traffic Study Update ( #2), BRW Inc., May 1993, adjusted to
1999 values based on 2.3% increase per year (from Mn/DOT ADT flow maps)
tripgen.xls(Frauenshuh -Turn) 10/14/1999
Table 4B
PM Peak Hour Turning Movements for Development by Ron Clark Construction and Opus Northwest
Grandview Area Traffic Study, Edina, Minnesota
Intersection / Scenario
Existing
Traffic Control
North Approach
LT TH RT
East Approach
LT TH RT
South Approach
LT TH RT
West Approach
LT TH RT
Vernon Avenue/Link Road
Traffic Signal
Existing'
101
628
11
212
6
88
2
799
186
19
10
13
Site - Generated
14
0
0
107
0
64
0
0
100
0
0
0
Post - Development
115
628
11
320
6
152
2
799
286
19
10
13
Eden Road/Arcadia Avenue
4 -Way STOP
Existing'
100
75
29
47
257
76
23
38
36
14
296
33
Site - Generated
0
0
0
0
36
0
11
0
0
0
39
11
Post - Development
100
75
29
47
293
76
34
38
36
1 14
335
45
Source: BRW, Inc.
Notes:
1. Source: Grandview Area Traffic Study Update ( #2), BRW Inc., May 1993, adjusted to
1999 values based on 2.3% increase per year (from Mn/DOT ADT flow maps)
tripgen.xis(Opus -Turn) 10/14/1999
Table 4C
PM Peak Hour Turning Movements for Development by Jerry's Ent., Laukka - Jarvis and Namron Co.
Grandview Area Traffic Study, Edina, Minnesota
Intersection / Scenario
Existing
Traffic Control
North Approach
LT TH RT
East Approach
LT TH RT
South Approach
LT TH RT
West Approach
LT TH RT
Vernon Avenue/Link Road
Traffic Signal
Existing 1
101
628
11
212
6
88
2
799
186
19
10
13
Site - Generated
64
57
0
66
0
52
0
34
72
0
0
0
Post - Development
164
685
11
278
6
140
2
833
258
19
10
13
Eden Road/Arcadia Avenue
4 -Way STOP
Existing 1
100
75
29
47
257
76
23
38
36
14
296
33
Site - Generated
0
0
0
0
47
0
14
0
0
0
45
13
Post - Development
100
75
29
47
304
76
37
38
36
14
340
46
Source: BRW, Inc.
Notes:
1. Source: Grandview Area Traffic Study Update ( #2), BRW Inc., May 1993, adjusted to
1999 values based on 2.3% increase per year (from Mn/DOT ADT flow maps)
CITY OF
EDNA
tripgen.xls(Jerrys -Turn) 10/14/1999
Table 4D -1
PM Peak Hour Turning Movements for Development by Stuart Companies - Option 1
Grandview Area Traffic Study, Edina, Minnesota
Intersection / Scenario
Existing
Traffic Control
North Approach
LT TH RT
East Approach
LT TH RT
South Approach
LT TH RT
West Approach
LT TH RT
Vernon Avenue/Link Road
Traffic Signal
Existing 1
101
628
11
212
6
88
2
799
186
19
10
13
Site - Generated
58
0
0
70
0
42
0
0
98
0
0
0
Post - Development
159
628
11
282
6
130
2
799
284
19
10
13
Eden Road/Arcadia Avenue
4 -Way STOP
Existing 1
100
75
29
47
257
76
23
38
36
14
296
33
Site - Generated
0
0
0
0
35
0
10
0
0
0
25
7
Post - Development
100
75
29
47
292
76
33
38
36
14
321
41
Source: BRW, Inc.
Notes:
1. Source: Grandview Area Traffic Study Update ( #2), BRW Inc., May 1993, adjusted to
1999 values based on 2.3% increase per year (from Mn/DOT ADT flow maps)
CITY
tripgen.xls(Stuart- Turn(1)) 10/14/1999
Table 4D -2
PM Peak Hour Turning Movements for Development by Stuart Companies - Option 2
Grandview Area Traffic Study, Edina, Minnesota
Intersection / Scenario
Existing
Traffic Control
North Approach
LT TH RT
East Approach
LT TH RT
South Approach
LT TH RT
West Approach
LT TH RT
Vernon AvenuelLink Road
Traffic Signal
Existing 1
101
628
11
212
6
88 ,
2
799
186
19
10
13
Site - Generated
62
0
0
74
0
44
0
0
105
0
0
0
Post - Development
163
628
11
286
6
132
2
799
290
19
10
13
Eden Road/Arcadia Avenue
4 -Way STOP
Existing 1
100
75
29
47
257
76
23
38
36
14
296
33
Site- Generated
0
0
0
0
38
0
11
0
0
0
27
8
Post - Development
100
75
29
47
295
76
34
38
36
1 14
322
41
Source: BRW, Inc.
Notes:
1. Source: Grandview Area Traffic Study Update ( #2), BRW Inc., May 1993, adjusted to
1999 values based on 2.3% increase per year (from Mn/DOT ADT flow maps)
tdpgen.xls(Stuart- Turn(2)) 10/14/1999
Table 4E
Percentage Increase of Traffic by Development Alternative
Grandview Area Traffic Study, Edina, Minnesota
Source: BRW, Inc.
Notes:
1. Percent increase in traffic based on 1999 turning movements
UFY OF
EDNA
compareAs( %Increase) 10/15/1999
Increase in Traffic During PM Peak Hour
Link Road
Eden Avenue
and
and
Development Alternative
Vernon Avenue
Arcadia Avenue
Existing (No- Build) 1
0.0%
0.0%
[1993 +2.3% per year]
Frauenshuh Companies
- 22.0%
13.0%
Ron Clark Construction and
13.7%
9.5%
Opus Northwest
Jerry's Enterprises, Laukka- Jarvis
18.9%
12.1
and Namron Company
Stuart Companies - Alternative 1
12.9%
7.5%
Stuart Companies - Alternative 2
13.7%
8.2%
Source: BRW, Inc.
Notes:
1. Percent increase in traffic based on 1999 turning movements
UFY OF
EDNA
compareAs( %Increase) 10/15/1999
Table 5
Existing Roadway Geometry and Intersection Traffic Control
Grandview Area Traffic Study, Edina, Minnesota
Intersection
Traffic
Approach Geometry
Control
North
East
South
West
Link Road
and
Vernon Avenue
Traffic Signal'
Eden Avenue
and
Arcadia Avenue
All -Way STOP
Source: BRW, Inc.
Notes:
1. Exclusive Left -Turn Phasing on Vernon Avenue
0; C1_1Y OF
EDNA
compare.xls(ApproachGeom) 10/15/1999
Table 6
Summary of Capacity Analysis for All Development Scenarios
(does not include additional development traffic)
Grandview Area Traffic Study, Edina, Minnesota
INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE.
Source: BRW, Inc.
SEGMENT LEVEL OF SERVICE
PM Peak Hour
Level of Service
Eden Avenue - Link Road to Arcadia Street
Link Road
Eden Avenue
3 -Lane Section
and
and
Development Alternative
Vernon Avenue t
Arcadia Avenue
Existing (No- Build)
B
B
[1993+2.3t/'o per year]
Frauenshuh Companies
B
C
Ron Clark Construction and
B
C
Opus Northwest
Jerry's Enterprises, Laukka - Jarvis
B
C
and Namron Company
Stuart Companies - Alternative 1
B
C
Stuart Companies - Alternative 2
B
C
Source: BRW, Inc.
SEGMENT LEVEL OF SERVICE
Source: BRW, Inc. using average ADT values for typical urban streets
Notes:
1. LOS calculations assume existing traffic signal
phasing with optimizing timings
CITY OF
EDINA
compare.xls(LOS) 10/15/1999
PM Peak Hour Level of Service
Eden Avenue - Link Road to Arcadia Street
Development Alternative
2 -Lane Section
3 -Lane Section
Existing (No- Build)
[ 1993 +2.3% per year]
A
A
All- Development Alternatives
C / D
B
Source: BRW, Inc. using average ADT values for typical urban streets
Notes:
1. LOS calculations assume existing traffic signal
phasing with optimizing timings
CITY OF
EDINA
compare.xls(LOS) 10/15/1999
Table 7
Summary of BRW Traffic Analyses
Grandview Area Traffic Study, Edina, Minnesota
Source: BRW, Inc.
Notes:
1. 1993 Analyses completed for 3 different development scenarios
2. Existing LOS refers to specific year (i.e. 1993 vs. 1999)
CITY q; E L!INA
compare.xls(93Report) 10/15/1999
1993
1999
Analysis Criterion
Grandview Area Traffic
Traffic Study for
Study Update ( #2)
Development Scenarios
1990 Mn/DOT Flow Maps and 1993 Tube Counts
1992 -96 Mn/DOT Flow Maps averaged to
ADT Volumes
by City of Edina
determine annual increase to adjust 1996 ADT to
1999
Turning Movements
(Existing)
1993 counts adjusted by 2.3% per year for all
movements
Directional Distribution
1993 Vehicle Trace Survey
1993 Vehicle Trace Survey
Trip Generation t
1,180 to 11,300 Daily Vehicle Trips
3,150 to 4,950 Daily Vehicle Trips
Vernon Avenue / Link Road: LOS B
Vernon Avenue / Link Road: LOS B
Existing Level of Service
Eden Avenue / Arcadia Street: LOS B
Eden Avenue / Arcadia Street: LOS B
Eden Avenue: LOS A
Eden Avenue: LOS A
Forecast Post - Development
Vernon Avenue / Link Road: LOS B/C
Vernon Avenue / Link Road: LOS B
Level of Service
Eden Avenue / Arcadia Street: LOS B/C
Eden Avenue / Arcadia Street: LOS C
Eden Avenue: LOS C/D (2- lane); LOS B (3 -lane)
Eden Avenue: LOS C/D (2- lane); LOS B (3 -lane)
Source: BRW, Inc.
Notes:
1. 1993 Analyses completed for 3 different development scenarios
2. Existing LOS refers to specific year (i.e. 1993 vs. 1999)
CITY q; E L!INA
compare.xls(93Report) 10/15/1999
6.
i
M
EHLERS
& ASSOCIATES INC
MEMORANDUM
To: City of Edina
From: Rusty Fifield
Subject: Grandview Redevelopment Proposals
Preliminary Financial Analysis
Date: October 15, 1999
Ehlers & Associates has worked with City Staff to prepare a preliminary financial analysis of the
four development proposals for the Grandview/Eden Avenue redevelopment area. The analysis
focuses on four basic questions:
• How much property valuation and tax increment revenue will be created by the proposed
development?
• What public costs and TIF eligible development expense are requested by each proposal?
• What are the sources of revenues to cover the proposed costs?
• Is the proposed use of TIF feasible?
The analysis that accompanies this memo is designed to provide the City Council with an even-
handed comparison of the proposals. I will review the analysis and answer your questions at the
October 19th meeting. .
Assumptions
To the greatest degree possible, we have used the information provided by the proposers.
However, some aspects of the development project need to be equalized. The cost of public
facilities, improvements and land should be the same for all proposals. For this reason, all
analyses relies on the following assumptions:
• Land acquisition and demolition costs have been estimated by the City. Land costs are
assumed to be 1999 assessor's estimated market value with a 40% contingency.
• No new land costs are shown for the Kunz -Lewis properties. The cost of Kunz -Lewis is
accounted for by repaying the debt incurred for the original purchase of these parcels.
L E A D E R S I N P U B L I C F I N A N C E
Equal Opportunity Employer
Charter Member of the National Association
of Independent Public Finance Advisors
3060 Centre Pointe Drive, Roseville, MN 55113.1105 651.697.8500 fax 651.697.8555 www.ehlers - inc.com
Grandview Redevelopment Proposals
October 15, 1999
Page 2
Library and senior center costs have been estimated by the City. Facility costs are
assumed to be $130 per square foot with a 10% contingency.
All proposals must support $500,000 for offsite public improvements and $500,000 for
City administrative and legal expense. Offsite improvements include streetscape on Eden
Avenue and traffic related improvements.
The other costs used in the analysis come from the proposals and the developer
interviews.
The analysis uses both the existing tax increment revenue from the Grandview District and the
estimated tax increment from new development. The analysis assumes that the cash balance in
the Grandview TIF Fund and monies from the purchase of land by the developer (i.e. -
reimbursement for the Kunz -Lewis properties) will first be used to retire all existing debt for the
District. This step allows all tax increment revenues in the years 2000 through 2010 to be
applied to the development proposals.
The calculation of estimated market value is based on the proposed quantity of non - residential
development and the value "per residential unit" suggested by each proposal. The estimated
market value is used to calculate the tax capacity values based on the statutory rates for taxes
payable 2000. Tax increment is calculated using the tax rate for pay 1999. No inflation of new
or existing values is used in the analysis. The attachments to this memo detail the assumptions
on property values, phasing and tax increment revenues for each proposal.
Each proposal takes a slightly different approach to financing the TIF eligible costs. All bond
issuing expense, interest rate and debt structuring assumptions were made by Ehlers and applied
equally to all proposals.
• The Laukka -Jarvis proposal assumes that the City issues bonds for all costs.
• The Stuart proposal assumes that all uses of public funds will be financed on a pay -as-
you-go basis.
• The Opus -Clark proposal assumes a mix of bonds and pay -as- you -go. This analysis
assumes that the public costs (library, senior center, offsite improvement and
administration) will be financed with bonds. All other TIF eligible expenses will be
reimbursed to the developer through a pay -as- you -go note.
• The Frauenshuh proposal assumes use of a pay -as- you -go note and G.O. bonds. The
amount of the pay -as- you -go note equals the parking facility costs. All other costs are
financed with City bonds.
Grandview Redevelopment Proposals
October 15, 1999
Page 3
The amount of "G.O. Bonds Required" in each proposal varies based on the proposal approach
and the amount of net land purchase revenue available to reduce the debt need. The combined
G.O. Bond and a Pay -As- You -Go Note "Required" in the analysis represents the financing
needed to support all proposed uses of public funds. The amount of debt supportable with
available tax increment revenue equals Ehlers estimate of the debt capacity of the proposal. The
difference between debt capacity and debt required equals the funding gap for the proposal.
Results of Analysis
The purpose of this analysis is to assess if a gap exists and, if so, how large. The analysis does
not seek to evaluate means of closing the gap. Such an evaluation can best be accomplished
through negotiations with the developer ultimately selected by the HRA.
The first table in the analytical attachments to this memo contains a comparison of the uses and
sources of public funds for the proposals. In addition to a "base" proposal, the analysis also
examines the implications of development without relocation of the bus garage and the
redevelopment of that site. This table illustrates the similarities and the differences between the
proposed development alternatives.
Following the summary table, the attachments contain the analysis of each development option
listed in the summary. This supporting material presents more detailed information on the tax
increment and debt projections used in the analysis.
Laukka - Jarvis: Under the assumptions used in this analysis, the Laukka -Jarvis proposal fully
finances all proposed uses of public funds both with and without the development of the bus
garage site. It must be noted, however, that the costs of land and construction for a new bus
garage are not included in the analysis. The Laukka -Jarvis proposal is the only one fully funded
by City G.O. Bonds (based on the financing requested in the proposal). The lower interest cost
of the bonds (compared with a pay -as- you -go note) improves the financial feasibility of this
proposal. The Laukka -Jarvis proposal also benefits from a timetable with substantial
construction in 2000 producing tax increment revenues in 2002.
Stuart: The Stuart proposal has three variations. One Stuart variation achieves fully funded uses
and two result in funding gaps. The full proposal (with relocation- redevelopment of the bus
garage) does not produce enough revenues to cover proposed uses of public funds. Without the
bus garage component, the proposed housing and hotel development offers a fully funded
alternative. Dropping the hotel and replacing it with 40 units of additional housing reduces
estimated revenues below the break -even point. The Stuart proposal is the only one with
proposed land purchase amounts below the City cost of Kunz- Lewis.
Opus-Clark: The Opus -Clark proposals creates the greatest amount of total property valuation,
Grandview Redevelopment Proposals
October 15, 1999
Page 4
but faces a large funding gap. The four year build out of the housing combined with the limited
life of the Grandview TIF District constrain the funding capacity of this proposal. A separate
analysis of the base proposal without the bus garage is not included. The developer indicates
that removing the bus garage decreases the estimated parking facility cost by $200,000. It
should be noted that this proposal relocates the bus garage, but does not assume new
development on the existing garage site.
Frauenshuh: The Frauenshuh proposal faces similar time - related constraints. The available
revenue is not sufficient to fund all proposed costs. The proposal both with and without the bus
garage shows large gaps between uses of public funds and available funding sources. From a
financial perspective, the Frauenshuh proposal is the only one to provide for both site and
construction of the bus garage.
City of Edina
Grandview Redevelopment
LaukkaJarvis
PRELIMINARY - For Discussion Only
Stuart
Opus /Clark Frauenshuh
SOURCES OF PUBLIC FUNDS
Cash Balance in TIF District (12/31/99)
2,175,000
2,175,000
2,175,000
No Bus
No Bus
2,175,000
2,175,000
2,175,000
Purchase of land By Developer
3,262,000
No Bus
2,418,000
Garage With Garage With
2,018,000
3,700,000
No Bus
3,250,000
Base
Garage
Base
Hotel
Housing
Base
Base
Garage
USES OF PUBLIC FUNDS
New G.O. Bonds Required
7,210,000
6,510,000
0
0
0
2,795,000
7,815,000
Library Constructidh
2,860,000
2,860,000
2,860,000
2,860,000
2,860,000
2,860,000
2,860,000
2,860,000
Senior CenterConstructidn
2,145,000
2,145,000
2,145,000
2,145,000
2,145,000
2,145,000
2,145,000
2,145,000
Bus Garage Construction
0
0
0
0
0
0
NA
NA
Olfsite Improvements
500,000
500,000
500,000
600,000
600,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
Statf/Legal/Consultin@
500 ,000
500,000
500,000
500, 000
500,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
Kunz- Lewist
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TAG9
1,518,440
1,518,440
1,518,440
1,518,440
1,518,440
1,518,440
0
0
Bus Garage
1,050,000
0
1,050,000
0
0
0
0
0
Noonan2
0
0
766,920.
766,920
766,920
766,920
0
0
Animal Hospitat
0
0
256,200
256,200
256,200
256,200
0
0
Hair Salon2
0
0
0
0
0
309,820
0
0
New Bus Garage SRe
0
0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Demolitior9
650,000
300,000
800,000
460,000
450,000
500,000
0
0
Railroad Station/TheAr
650,000
650,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
Parka
0
0
0
0
0
100,000
550,000
550,000
Parking3
0
0
0
0
0
5,265,000
6,000,000
4,000,000
Contingency/Finande
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,000,000
1,000,000
Site Developmer3t
0
0
0
0
0
1,505,000
2,900,000
2,400,000
Subtotal Public Uses
9,873,440
8,473,440.
10,396,560
8,996,560
8,996,560
16,226,380
16,455,000
13,955,000
Pay OH Existing Debt
3,594,750
3,594,750
3,594,750
3,594,750
3,594,750
3,594,750
3,594,750
3,594,750
Bondlssuancd
178,810
161,810
103,250
113,250
113,250
70,250
190,250
180,250
TOTAL USES OF PUBLIC FUNDS
13,647,000
12,230,000
14,094,560
12,704,560
12,704,560
19,891,380
20,240,000
17,730,000
SOURCES OF PUBLIC FUNDS
Cash Balance in TIF District (12/31/99)
2,175,000
2,175,000
2,175,000
2,175,000
2,175,000
2,175,000
2,175,000
2,175,000
Purchase of land By Developer
3,262,000
2,545,000
2,418,000
2,018,000
2,018,000
3,700,000
3,250,000
3,250,000
Sale of Existing Libraiy
1,000,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
New G.O. Bonds Required
7,210,000
6,510,000
0
0
0
2,795,000
7,815,000
7,305,000
Pay -As- You -Go Note Required
0
0
8,501,560
7,511,560
7,511,560
10,221,380
6,000,000
4,000,000
TOTAL SOURCES OF PUBLIC FUNDS
13,647,000
12,230,000
14,094,560
12,704,560
12,704,560
19,891,380.
20,240,000
17,730,000
DEBT SUPPORTABLE WITH AVAILABLE INCRE
7,210,000
6,510,000
8,232,123
7,511,560
7,265,476
9,865,951
9,919,644
9,124,582
PROJECTED FUNDING GAP
0
0
(269,437)
0
(246,083)
(3,150,429)
(3,895,365)
(2,180,418)
1 Cost of Kunz -Lewis property accounted for in the repayment of existing debt used to purchase land
2 Costs determined by City and applied to all proposals.
3 Costs proposed by developer.
4 Calculated by Ehlers.
Ehlers 8 Associates, Inc. 10/15/1999 Page 1 of 1
PRELIMINARY - For Discussion Only
City of Edina
Laukka -Jarvis - Base Proposal
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL
USES OF PUBLIC FUNDS
Library Construction 2,860,000
Senior Center Construction 2,145,000
Bus Garage Construction 0
Offsite Improvements 500,000
Staff /Legal /Consulting 500,000
Kunz -Lewis
0 1
TAGS
1,518,440
Bus Garage
1,050,000
Noonan
0
Animal Hospital
0
Hair Salon
0
New Bus.Garage Site
0
Demolition
650,000
Railroad Station/Theater
650,000
Park
0
Parking
0
Contingency /Finance
0
Site Development
0
Subtotal Public Uses
9,873,440
Pay Off Existing Debt 3,594,750 1
Bond Issuance 178,810
TOTAL USES OF PUBLIC FUNDS 13,647,000
SOURCES OF PUBLIC FUNDS
Cash Balance in TIF District (12/31/99)
2,175,000
Purchase of Land By Developer
3,262,000
Sale of Existing Library
1,000,000
New G.O. Bonds Required
7,210,000
Pay -As- You -Go Note Required
0
TOTAL SOURCES OF PUBLIC FUNDS
13,647,000
DEBT SUPPORTABLE WITH AVAILABLE INCREMENT
7,210,000
PROJECTED FUNDING GAP (0)
1 Cost of Kunz -Lewis property accounted for in the repayment of existing debt
used to purchase land.
2 Analysis does not include land or construction for new bus garage.
Ehlers & Associates, Inc. 10/15/99 Page 1 of 4
U
PRELIMINARY - For Discussion Only
City of Edina
Laukka -Jarvis - Base Proposal
Estimated Tax Increment
Ehlers & Associates, Inc. 10/15/99 Page 2 of 4
Total
Total
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007 Year Taxes Pay
Total
Per
Market
Tax
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006 Year Assess
Project
Units
Unit
Value
Capacity
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005 Year Build
Condos
50
175,000
8,750,000
119,675
75%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Condos
50
175,000
8,750,000
119,675
0%
75%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Rental
110
75,000
8,250,000
198,000
75%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Office
84,000
115
9,660,000
326,940
75%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
0
0
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Total
35,410,000
764,290
Total Years of
TIF Capture
9.0
Estmiated Annual Value Inflation
0.00%
Tax
Gross
Local
New
Existing
Total
Tax
Capacity Values
Extension
Tax
Retained
Semi - Annual
Semi - Annual
Annual
Tax - Exempt
Taxable
Net
Year
Base
Total
Captured
Rate
Increment
2.00%
Increment
Increment
Increment
Bonds
Bonds
Increment
1999
48,538
1.1800
0
2000
48,538
1.1800
0
355,893
711,785
247,788
138,554
325,443
355,893
2001
48,538
-
1.1800
-
0
355,893
711,785
297,345
135,385
279,055
355,893
2002
48,538
483,461
434,923
1.1800
513,209
(10,264)
251,472
355,893
1,214,730
862,345
136,045
216,340
251,472
355,893
2003
48,538
734,371
685,833
1.1800
809,283
(16,186)
396,549
355,893
1,504,882
862,485
136,320
506,077
396,549
355,893
2004
48,538
764,290
715,752
1.1800
844,587
(16,892)
413,848
355,893
1,539,480
865,935
136,200
537,345
413,848
355,893
2005
48,538
764,290
715,752
1.1800
844,587
(16,892)
413,848
355,893
1,539,480
862,415
140,675
536,390
413,848
355,893
2006
48,538
764,290
715,752
1.1800
844,587
(16,892)
413,848
355,893
1,539,480
867,100
139,405
532,975
413,848
355,893
2007
48,538
764,290
715,752
1.1800
844,587
(16,892)
413,848
355,893
1,539,480
864,460
137,705
537,315
413,848
355,893
2008
48,538
764,290
715,752
1.1800
844,587
(16,892)
413,848
355,893
1,539,480
864,670
140,565
534,245
413,848
355,893
2009
48,538
764,290
715,752
1.1800
844,587
(16,892)
413,848
355,893
1,539,480
862,420
137,630
539,430
413,848
355,893
2010
48,538
764,290
715,752
1.1800
844,587
(16,892)
413,848
355,893
1,539,480
862,640
139,230
537,610
413,848
355,893
Total
7,234,601
(144,692)
7,089,909
7,829,635
Ehlers & Associates, Inc. 10/15/99 Page 2 of 4
PRELIMINARY - For Discussion Only
City of Edina
Laukka - Jarvis - Base Proposal
G.O. Bonds
Date Prihci al
2/1/01
0
2/1/02
0
2/1/03
565,000
2/1/04
590,000
2/1/05
620,000
2/1/06
645,000
2/1/07
680,000
2/1/08
710,000
2/1/09
745,000
2/1/10
780,000
2/1/11
820,000
TOTAL
6,155,000
Dated 4/01/2000
Delivery Date 4/01/2000
First Coupon Date 8/01/2000
Bond Year Dollars
$43,964.17
Average Life
7.143 Years
Average Coupon
4.92356%
Net Interest Cost (NIC)
5.11956%
True Interest Cost (TIC)
5.15315%
Rate
Interest
P &I
0.000%
247,787.50
247,787.50
0.000%
297,345.00
297,345.00
4.400%
297,345.00
862,345.00
4.500%
272,485.00
862,485.00
4.600%
245,935.00
865,935.00
4.700%
217,415.00
862,415.00
4.800%
187,100.00
867,100.00
4.900%
154,460.00
864,460.00
5.000%
119,670.00
864,670.00
5.100%
82,420.00
862,420.00
5.200%
42,640.00
862,640.00
2,164,602.50
8,319,602.50
Ehlers & Associates, Inc. 10/15/99 Page 3 of 4
City of Edina
Laukka- Jarvis - Base Proposal
Taxable G.O. Bonds
Date Principal
2/1/01
80,000
2/1/02
70,000
2/1/03
75,000
2/1/04
80,000
2/1/05
85,000
2/1/06
95,000
2/1/07
100,000
2/1/08
105,000
2/1/09
115,000
211110
120,000
2/1/11
130,000
TOTAL
1,055,000
Bond Year Dollars $6,789.17
Average Life 6.435 Years
Average Coupon 6.82%
Dated 4/01/2000
Delivery Date 4/01/2000
First Coupon Date 8/01/2000
Rate
Interest
P &I
6.100%
58,554.17
138,554.17
6.200%
65,385.00
135,385.00
6.300%
61,045.00
136,045.00
6.400%
56,320.00
136,320.00
6.500%
51,200.00
136,200.00
6.600%
45,675.00
140,675.00
6.700%
39,405.00
139,405.00
6.800%
32,705.00
137,705.00
6.900%
25,565.00
140,565.00
7.000%
17,630.00
137,630.00
7.100%
9,230.00
139,230.00
462,714.17
1,517,714.17
PRELIMINARY - For Discussion Only
City of Edina
Laukka -Jarvis - No Bus Garage
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL
USES OF PUBLIC FUNDS
Library Construction 2,860,000
Senior Center Construction 2,145,000
Bus Garage Construction 0
Offsite Improvements 500,000
Staff /Legal /Consulting 500,000
Kunz -Lewis
0 1
TAGS
1,518,440
Bus Garage
0
Noonan
0
Animal Hospital
0
Hair Salon
0
New Bus Garage Site
0
Demolition
300,000
Railroad Station/Theater
650,000
Park
0
Parking
0
Contingency /Finance
0
Site Development
0
Subtotal Public Uses
8,473,440
Pay Off Existing Debt 3,594,750 1
Bond Issuance 161,810
TOTAL USES OF PUBLIC FUNDS 12,230,000
SOURCES OF PUBLIC FUNDS
Cash Balance in TIF District (12/31/99)
2,175,000
Purchase of Land By Developer
2,545,000
Sale of Existing Library
1,000,000
New G.O. Bonds Required
6,510,000
Pay -As- You -Go Note Required
0
TOTAL SOURCES OF PUBLIC FUNDS
12,230,000
DEBT SUPPORTABLE WITH AVAILABLE INCREMENT 6,510,000
PROJECTED FUNDING GAP (0)
l Cost of Kunz -Lewis property accounted for in the repayment of existing debt
used to purchase land.
Ehlers & Associates, Inc. 10/15/99
Page 1 of 4
PRELIMINARY - For Discussion Only
City of Edina
Laukka -Jarvis - No Bus Garage
Estimated Tax Increment
2006
2007 Year Taxes Pay
2005
Total
Total
2002
2003
2004
2005
100%
Total
Per
Market
Tax
2001
2002
2003
2004
Project
Units
Unit
Value
Capacity
2000
2001
2002
2003
Condos
50
175,000
8,750,000
119,675
75%
100%
100%
100%
Condos
50
175,000
8,750,000
119,675
0%
75%
100%
100%
Rental
110
75,000
8,250,000
198,000
75%
100%
100%
100%
Office
0
0
0
0
75%
100%
100%
100%
0
0
0%
0%
0%
0%
Total
25,750,000
437,350
Total Years of
TIF Capture
9.0
Estmiated Annual Value Inflation
0.00%
Tax
Gross
Local
New
Existing
Tax
Capacity Values
Extension
Tax
Retained
Semi - Annual
Semi - Annual
Year
Base
Total
Captured
Rate
Increment
2.00%
Increment
Increment
1999
48,538
1.1800
0
2000
48,538
1.1800
0
355,893
355,893
2001
48,538
-
-
1.1800
-
0
355,893
355,893
2002
48,538
238,256
189,718
1.1800
223,867
(4,477)
109.695
355,893
109,695
355,893
2003
48,538
407,431
358,893
1.1800
423,494
(8,470)
207,512
355,893
207,512
355,893
2004
48,538
437,350
388,812
1.1800
458,798
(9,176)
224,811
355,893
224,811
355,893
2005
48,538
437,350
388,812
1.1800
458,798
(9,176)
224,811
355,893
224,811
355,893
2006
48,538
437,350
388,812
1.1800
458,798
(9,176)
224,811
355,893
224,811
355,893
2007
48,538
437,350
388,812
1.1800
458,798
(9,176)
224,811
355,893
224,811
355,893
2008
48,538
437,350
388,812
1.1800
458,798
(9,176)
224,811
355,893
224,811
355,893
2009
48,538
437,350
388,812
1.1800
458,798
(9,176)
224,811
355,893
224,811
355,893
2010
48,538
437,350
388,812
1.1800
458,798
(9,176)
224,811
355,893
224,811
355,893
Total
3,858,945
(77,179)
3,781,766
7,829,635
2006
2007 Year Taxes Pay
2005
2006 Year Assess
2004
2005 Year Build
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100% .
100%
100%
0%
0%
Total
Annual
Tax - Exempt
Taxable
Net
Increment
Bonds
Bonds
Increment
711,785
247,788
44,717
419,281
711,785
297,345
47,135
367,305
931,175
862,345
45,585
23,245
1,126,809
862,485
44,010
220,314
1,161,407
865,935
47,410
248,062
1,161,407
862,415
45,460
253,532
1,161,407
867,100
48,480
245,827
1,161,407
864,460
46,135
250,812
1,161:407
864,670
48,755
247,982
1,161,407
862,420
45,995
252,992
1,161,407
862,640
48,195
250,572
Ehlers & Associates, Inc. 10/15/99 Page 2 of 4
PRELIMINARY - For Discussion Only
City of Edina
Laukka- Jarvis - No Bus Garage
G.O. Bonds
Date Principal
2/1/01
0
2/1/02
0
2/1/03
565,000
2/1/04
590,000
2/1/05
620,000
2/1/06
645,000
2/1/07
680,000
2/1/08
710,000
2/1/09
745,000
2/1/10
780,000
2/1/11
820,000
TOTAL
6,155,000
Dated 4/01/2000
Delivery Date 4/01/2000
First Coupon Date 8/01/2000
Bond Year Dollars
$38,424.17
Average Life
6.243 Years
Average Coupon
4.90229%
Net Interest Cost (NIC)
5.12655%
True Interest Cost (TIC)
5.16231%
Ehlers & Associates, Inc.
Rate
Interest
P &I
4.200%
247,787.50
247,787.50
4.300%
297,345.00
297,345.00
4.400%
297,345.00
862,345.00
4.500%
272,485.00
862,485.00
4.600%
245,935.00
865,935.00
4.700%
217,415.00
862,415.00
4.800%
187,100.00
867,100.00
4.900%
154,460.00
864,460.00
5.000%
119,670.00
864,670.00
5.100%
82,420.00
862,420.00
5.200%
42,640.00
862,640.00
2,164,602.50
8,319,602.50
10/15/99
Page 3 of 4
City of Edina
Laukka -Jarvis - No Bus Garage
Taxable G.O. Bonds
Date Principal
2/1/01
25,000
2/1/02
25,000
2/1/03
25,000
2/1/04
25,000
2/1/05
30,000
2/1/06
30,000
2/1/07
35,000
2/1/08
35,000
2/1/09
40,000
2/1/10
40,000
2/1/11
45,000
TOTAL
355,000
Bond Year Dollars $2,300.83
Average Life 6.481 Years
Average Coupon 6.82%
Dated 4/01/2000
Delivery Date 4/01/2000
First Coupon Date 8/01/2000
Rate
Interest
P &I
6.100%
19,716.67
44,716.67
6.200%
22,135.00
47,135.00
6.300%
20,585.00
45,585.00
6.400%
19,010.00
44,010.00
6.500%
17,410.00
47,410.00
6.600%
15,460.00
45,460.00
6.700%
13,480.00
48,480.00
6.800%
11,135.00
46,135.00
6.900%
8,755.00
48,755.00
7.000%
5,995.00
45,995.00
7.100%
3,195.00
48,195.00
156,876.67
511,876.67
PRELIMINARY - For Discussion Only
City of Edina
Stuart - Base Proposal
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL
USES OF PUBLIC FUNDS
Library Construction 2,860,000
Senior Center Construction 2,145,000
Bus Garage Construction 0
Offsite Improvements 500,000
Staff /Legal /Consulting 500,000
Kunz -Lewis
0 '
TAGS
1,518,440
Bus Garage
1,050,000
Noonan
766,920
Animal Hospital
256,200
Hair Salon
0
New Bus Garage Site
NA
Demolition
800,000
Railroad Station/Theater
0
Park
0
Parking
0
Contingency /Finance
0
Site Development
0
Subtotal Public Uses
10,396,560
Pay Off Existing Debt
3,594,750 '
Bond Issuance
103,250
TOTAL USES OF PUBLIC FUNDS 14,094,560
SOURCES OF FUNDS
Cash Balance in TIF District (12/31/99)
2,175,000
Purchase of Land By Developer
2,418,000
Sale of Existing Library
1,000,000
New G.O. Bonds Required
0
Pay -As- You -Go Note Required
8,501,560
TOTAL SOURCES OF PUBLIC FUNDS
14,094,560
DEBT SUPPORTABLE WITH AVAILABLE INCREMENT
8,232,123
PROJECTED FUNDING GAP (269,437)
Cost of Kunz -Lewis property accounted for in the repayment of existing debt
used to purchase land.
2 Analysis does not include funding for construction for new bus garage.
Ehlers & Associates, Inc. 10/15/1999 Page 1 of 3
PRELIMINARY - For Discussion Only
City of Edina
Stuart - Base Proposal
Estimated Tax Increment
Ehlers & Associates, Inc. 10/15/1999 Page 2 of 3
Total
Total
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007 Year Taxes Paid
Total
Per
Market
Tax
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006 Year Assessed
Project
Units
Unit
Value
Capacity
2000
2001
2002
_ 2003
2004
2005 YearBUUf
Townhomes
180
100,000
18,000,000
432,000
75%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Hotel
103
55,000
5,665,000
191,110
0%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
0
0
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0
0
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0
0
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Total
23,665,000
623,110
Total Years of TIF Capture
9.0
Estmlated Annual Value
Inflation
0.00%
Tax
Gross
Local
New
Existing
Total
Tax Capacity Values
Extension
Tax
Retained
Semi- Annual Semi- Annual
Semi-Annual
Year
Base
Total
Captured
Rate
Increment
2.00°u
Increment
Increment
Increment
1999
32,234
-
-
1.1800
-
0
2000
32,234
-
-
1.1800
-
0
355,893
355,893
355,893
355,893
2001
32,234
-
-
1.1800
-
0
355,893
355,893
355,893
355,893
2002
32,234
324,000
291,766
1.1800
344,283
(6,886)
168,699
355,893
524,591
168,699
355,893
524,591
2003
32,234
623,110
590,876
1.1800
697,233
(13,945)
341,644
355,893
697,537
341,644
355,893
697,537
2004
32,234
623,110
590,876
1.1800
697,233
(13,945)
341,644
355,893
697,537
341,644
355,893
697,537
2005
32,234
623,110
590,876
1.1800
697,233
(13,945)
341,644
355,893
697,537
341,644
355,893
697,537
2006
32,234
623,110
590,876
1.1800
697,233
(13,945)
341,644
355,893
697,537
341,644
355,893
697,537
2007
32,234
623,110
590,876
1.1800
697,233
(13,945)
341,644
355,893
697,537
341,644
355,893
697,537
2008
32,234
623,110
590,876
1.1800
697,233
(13,945)
341,644
355,893
697,537
341,644
355,893
697,537
2009
32,234
623,110
590,876
1.1800
697,233
(13,945)
341,644
355,893
697,537
341,644
355,893
697,537
2010
32,234
623,110
590,876
1.1800
697,233
(13,945)
341,644
355,893
697,537
341,644
355,893
697,537
Total
5,922,149
(118,443)
5,803,706
7,829,635
Ehlers & Associates, Inc. 10/15/1999 Page 2 of 3
PRELIMINARY - For Discussion Only
City of Edina
Stuart - Base Proposal
"Pay -As- You -Go" Note
Amount 8,232,123
Rate 9.00%
Start 4/1/2000
2/1/2011
Total
667,489 30,037 697,526
30,857 8,262,980 . 5,370,351 13,633,331
697,537 -
Ehlers & Associates, Inc. 10/15/1999 Page 3 of 3
Accrued
Available
Date
Interest
Principal
Interest
Payment
Increment
Balance
8,232,123
8/1/2000
-
104,813
251,080
355,893
355,893
8,127,310
2/1/2001
9,836
-
355,893
355,893
355,893
8,137,147
8/1/2001
10,279
-
355,893
355,893
355,893
8,147,426
2/1/2002
10,742
-
355,893
355,893
355,893
8,158,167
8/1/2002
-
157,474
367,118
524,591
524,591
8,000,694
2/1/2003
-
164,560
360,031
524,591
524,591
7,836,133
8/1/2003
-
344,911
352,626
697,537
697,537
7,491,223
2/1/2004
-
360,432
337,105
697,537
697,537
7,130,791
8/1/2004
-
376,651
320,886
697,537
697,537
6,754,140
2/1/2005
-
393,600
303,936
697,537
697,537
6,360,539
8/1/2005
-
411,313
286,224
697,537
697,537
5,949,227
2/1/2006
-
429,822
267,715
697,537
697,537
5,519,405
8/1/2006
-
449,164
248,373
697,537
697,537
5,070,242
2/1/2007
-
469,376
228,161
697,537
697,537
4,600,866
8/1/2007
-
490,498
207,039
697,537
697,537
4,110,368
2/1/2008
-
512,570
184,967
697,537
697,537
3,597,798
8/1/2008
-
535,636
161,901
697,537
697,537
3,062,162
2/1/2009
-
559,739
137,797
697,537
697,537
2,502,422
8/1/2009
-
584,928
112,609
697,537
697,537
19917,495
2/1/2010
-
611,250
86,287
697,537
697,537
1,306,245
8/1/2010
-
638 756
58,781
697,537
697,537
667,489
2/1/2011
Total
667,489 30,037 697,526
30,857 8,262,980 . 5,370,351 13,633,331
697,537 -
Ehlers & Associates, Inc. 10/15/1999 Page 3 of 3
PRELIMINARY - For Discussion Only
City of Edina
Stuart - No Bus Garage/With Hotel
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL
USES OF PUBLIC FUNDS
Library Construction 2,860,000
Senior Center Construction 2,145,000
Bus Garage Construction 0
Offsite Improvements 500,000
Staff /Legal /Consulting 500,000
Kunz -Lewis
0
TAGS
1,518,440
Bus Garage
0
Noonan
766,920
Animal Hospital
256,200
Hair Salon
0
New Bus Garage Site
NA
Demolition
450,000
Railroad Station/Theater
0
Park
0
Parking
0
Contingency /Finance
0
Site Development
0
Subtotal Public Uses
8,996,560
Pay Off Existing Debt 3,594,750
Bond Issuance 113,250
TOTAL USES OF PUBLIC FUNDS 12,704,560
SOURCES OF FUNDS
Cash Balance in TIF District (12/31/99)
2,175,000
Purchase of Land By Developer
2,018,000
Sale of Existing Library
1,000,000
New G.O. Bonds Required
0
Pay -As- You -Go Note Required
7,511,560
TOTAL SOURCES OF PUBLIC FUNDS
12,704,560
DEBT SUPPORTABLE WITH AVAILABLE INCREMENT 7,511,560
PROJECTED FUNDING GAP 0
Cost of Kunz -Lewis property accounted for in the repayment of existing debt
used to purchase land.
Ehlers & Associates, Inc. 10/15/1999 Page 1 of 3
PRELIMINARY - For Discussion Only
City of Edina
Stuart - No Bus GarageMith Hotel
Estimated Tax Increment
Ehlers 8 Associates, Inc. 10/1511999 Page 2 of 3
Total
Total
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007 Year Taxes Paid
Total
Per
Market
Tax
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006 Year Assessed
Project
Units
Unit
Value
Capacity
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005 YearBuiH
Townhomes
140
100,000
14,000,000
336,000
75%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Hotel
103
55,000
5,665,000
191,110
0%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
0
0
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0
0
0%
0%
0%
0%
_ 0%
0%
0
0
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Total
19,665,000
527,110
Total Years of TIF Capture
9.0
Estmiated Annual Value
Inflation
0.00%
Tax
Gross
Local
New
Existing
Total
Tax Capacity Values
Extension
Tax
Retained
Semi - Annual Semi - Annual Semi - Annual
Year
Base
Total
Captured
Rate
Increment
2.00%
Increment
Increment
Increment
1999
23,000
-
-
1.1800
-
0
2000
23,000
-
-
1.1800
-
0
355,893
355,893
355,893
355,893
2001
23,000
-
-
1.1800
-
0
355,893
355,893
355,893
355,893
2002
23,000
252,000
229,000
1.1800
270,220
(5,404)
132,408
355,893
488,300
132,408
355,893
488,300
2003
23,000
527,110
504,110
1.1800
594,850
(11,897)
291,476
355,893
647,369
291,476
355,893
647,369
2004
23,000
527,110
504,110
1.1800
594,850
(11,897)
291,476
355,893
647,369
291,476
355,893
647,369
2005
23,000
527,110
504,110
1.1800
594,850
(11,897)
291,476
355,893
647,369
291,476
355,893
647,369
2006
23,000
527,110
504,110
1.1800
594,850
(11,897)
291,476
355,893
647,369
291,476
355,893
647,369
2007
23,000
527,110
504,110
1.1800
594,850
(11,897)
291,476
355,893
647,369
291,476
355,893
647,369
2008
23,000
527,110
504,110
1.1800
594,850
(11,897)
291,476
355,893
647,369
291,476
355,893
647,369
2009
23,000
527,110
504,110
1.1800
594,850
(11,897)
291,476
355,893
647,369
291,476
355,893
647,369
2010
23,000
527,110
504,110
1.1600
594,850
(11,897)
291,476
355,893
647,369
291,476
355,893
647,369
Total
5,029,018
(100,560)
4,928,438
7,829,635
Ehlers 8 Associates, Inc. 10/1511999 Page 2 of 3
PRELIMINARY - For Discussion Only
City of Edina
Stuart - No Bus Garage/With Hotel
"Pay -As- You -Go" Note
Amount 7,735,459
Rate 9.00%
Start 4/1/2000
Accrued
Available
Date Interest
Principal
Interest
Payment
Increment
Balance
7,735,459
8/1/2000 -
119,961
235,931
355,893
355,893
7,615,498
2/1/2001 -
13,195
342,697
355,893
355,893
7,602,303
8/1/2001 -
13,789
342,104
355,893
355,893
7,588,514
2/1/2002 -
14,409
341,483
355,893
355,893
7,574,104
8/1/2002 -
147,466
340,835
488,300
488,300
7,426,639
2/1/2003 -
154,102
334,199
488,300
488,300
7,272,537
8/1/2003 -
320,105
327,264
647,369
647,369
6,952,433
2/1/2004 -
334,509
312,859
647,369
647,369
6,617,923
8/1/2004 -
349,562
297,807
647,369
647,369
6,268,361
2/1/2005 -
365,293
282,076
647,369
647,369
5,903,068
8/1/2005 -
381,731
265,638
647,369
647,369
5,521,337
2/1/2006 -
398,909
248,460
647,369
647,369
5,122,428
8/1/2006 -
416,860
230,509
647,369
647,369
4,705,569
2/1/2007 -
435,618
211,751
647,369
647,369
4,269,951
8/1/2007 -
455,221
192,148
647,369
647,369
3,814,729
2/1/2008 -
475,706
171,663
647,369
647,369
3,339,023
8/1/2008 -
497,113
150,256
647,369
647,369
2,841,911
2/1/2009 -
519,483
127,886
647,369
647,369
2,322,428
8/1/2009 -
542,860
104,509
647,369
647,369
1,779,568
2/1/2010 -
567,288
80,081
647,369
647,369
1,212,280
8/1/2010 -
592,816
54,553
647,369
647,369
619,463
2/1/2011 -
619,463
27,876
647,339
647,369
-
Total -
7,735,459
5,022,584
12,758,043
Ehlers & Associates, Inc. 10/15/1999 Page 3 of 3
PRELIMINARY - For Discussion Only
City of Edina
Stuart - No Bus Garage/With Housing
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL
USES OF PUBLIC FUNDS
Library Construction
Senior Center Construction
Bus Garage Construction
Offsite Improvements
Staff /Legal/Consulting
Kunz -Lewis
TAGS
Bus Garage
Noonan
Animal Hospital
Hair Salon
New Bus Garage Site
Demolition
Railroad Station/Theater
Park
Parking
Contingency /Finance
Site Development
Subtotal Public Uses
Pay Off Existing Debt
Bond Issuance
TOTAL USES OF PUBLIC FUNDS
SOURCES OF FUNDS
Cash Balance in TIF District (12/31/99)
Purchase of Land By Developer
Sale of Existing Library
New G.O. Bonds Required
Pay -As- You -Go Note Required
TOTAL SOURCES OF PUBLIC FUNDS
DEBT SUPPORTABLE WITH AVAILABLE INCREMENT
PROJECTED FUNDING GAP
2,860,000
2,145,000
0
500,000
500,000
0
1,518,440
0
766,920
256,200
0
NA
450,000
0
0
0
0
0
8,996,560
3,594,750
113,250
12,704,560
2,175,000
2,018,000
1,000,000
0
7,511,560
12,704,560
7,265,476
(246,083)
Cost of Kunz -Lewis property accounted for in the repayment of existing debt
used to purchase land.
DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY
Estimated Market Value of New Development
Tax Capacity Value of New Development
18,000,000
432,000
Ehlers & Associates, Inc. 10/15/1999 Page 1 of 3
PRELIMINARY - For Uiscussion Only
City of Edina
Stuart - No Bus GarageMith Housing
Estimated Tax Increment
2007 Year Taxes Paid
2006 Year Assessed
2005 Year Built
100%
100%
0%
0%
0%
Ehlers & Associates, Inc. 10115/1999 Page 2 of 3
Total
Total
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
Total
Per
Market
Tax
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
Project
Units
Unit
Value
Capacity
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
Townhomes
180
100,000
18,000,000
432,000
75%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Hotel
0
55,000
0
0
0%
100%
100%
100%
100%
0
0
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0
0
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0
0
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Total
18,000,000
432,000
Total Years of TIF Capture
9.0
Estmiated Annual Value
Inflation
0.00%
Tax
Gross
Local
New
Existing
Total
Tax
Capacity Values
Extension
Tax
Retained
Semi - Annual
Semi- Annual Semi- Annual
Year
Base
Total
Captured
Rate
Increment
2.00°
Increment
Increment
Increment
1999
32,234
-
-
1.1800
-
0
2000
32,234
-
1.1800
-
0
355,893
355,893
355,893
355,893
2001
32,234
-
-
1.1800
-
0
355,893
355,893
355,893
355,893
2002
32,234
324,000
291,766
1.1800
344,283
(6,886)
168,699
355,893
524,591
168,699
355,893
524,591
2003
32,234
432,000
399,766
1.1800
471,723
(9,434)
231,144
355,893
587,037
231,144
355,893
587,037
2004
32,234
432,000
399,766
1.1800
471,723
(9,434)
231,144
355,893
587,037
231,144
355,893
587,037
2005
32,234
432,000
399,766
1.1800
471,723
(9,434)
231,144
355,893
587,037
231,144
355,893
587,037
2006
32,234
432,000
399,766
1.1800
471,723
(9,434)
231,144
355,893
587,037
231,144
355,893
587,037
2007
32,234
432,000
399,766
1.1800
471,723
(9,434)
231,144
355,893
587,037
231,144
355,893
587,037
2008
32,234
432,000
399,766
1.1800
471,723
(9,434)
231,144
355,893
587,037
231,144
355,893
587,037
2009
32,234
432,000
399,766
1.1800
471,723
(9,434)
231,144
355,893
587,037
231,144
355,893
587,037
2010
32,234
432,000
399,766
1.1800
471,723
(9,434)
231,144
355,893
587,037
231,144
355,893
587,037
Total
4,118,071
(82,361)
4,035,709
7,629,635
2007 Year Taxes Paid
2006 Year Assessed
2005 Year Built
100%
100%
0%
0%
0%
Ehlers & Associates, Inc. 10115/1999 Page 2 of 3
PRELIMINARY - For Discussion Only
City of Edina
Stuart - No Bus GarageMith Housing
"Pay -As- You -Go" Note
Amount 7,265,476
Rate 9.00%
Start 4/1/2000
Accrued
Available
Date Interest
Principal
Interest
Payment
Increment
Balance
7,265,476
8/1/2000 -
134,295
221,597
355,893
355,893
7,131,181
2/1/2001 -
34,989
320,903
355,893
355,893
7,096,191
8/1/2001 -
36,564
319,329
355,893
355,893
7,059,628
2/1/2002 -
38,209
317,683
355,893
355,893
7,021,418
8/1/2002 -
208,628
315,964
524,591
524,591
6,812,791
2/1/2003 -
218,016
306,576
524,591
524,591
6,594,775.
8/1/2003 -
290,272
296,765
587,037
587,037
6,304,503
2/1/2004 -
303,334
283,703
587,037
587,037
6,001,169
8/1/2004 -
316,984
270,053
587,037
587,037
5,684,184
2/1/2005 -
331,249
255,788
587,037
587,037
5,352,935
8/1/2005 -
346,155
240,882
587,037
587,037
5,006,781
2/1/2006 -
361,732
225,305
587,037
587,037
4,645,049
8/1/2006 -
378,010
209,027
587,037
587,037
4,267,039
2/1/2007 -
395,020
192,017
587,037
587,037
3,872,019
8/1/2007 -
412,796
174,241
587,037
587,037
3,459,223
2/1/2008 -
431,372
155,665
587,037
587,037
3,027,851
8/1/2008 -
450,784
136,253
587,037
587,037
2,577,067
2/1/2009 -
471,069
115,968
587,037
587,037
2,105,998
8/1/2009 -
492,267
94,770
587,037
587,037
1,613,731
2/1/2010 -
514,419
72,618
587,037
587,037
1,099,312
8/1/2010 -
537,568
49,469
587,037
587,037
561,744
2/1/2011 -
561,744
25,278
587,022
587,037
-
Total -
7,265,476
4,599,853
11,865,330
Ehlers & Associates, Inc. 10/15/1999 Page 3 of 3
PRELIMINARY - For Discussion Only
City of Edina
Opus /Clark - Base Proposal
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL
USES OF PUBLIC FUNDS
Library Construction 2,860,000
Senior Center Construction 2,145,000
Bus Garage Construction 0
Offsite Improvements 500,000
Staff /Legal /Consulting 500,000
Kunz -Lewis
0 1
TAGS
1,518,440
Bus Garage
0
Noonan
766,920
Animal Hospital
256,200
Hair Salon
309,820
New Bus Garage Site
NA
Demolition
500,000
Railroad Station/Theater
0
Park
100,000
Parking
5,265,000 2
Contingency /Finance
0
Site Development
1,505,000
Subtotal Public Uses
16,226,380
Pay Off Existing Debt 3,594,750 1
Bond Issuance 70,250
TOTAL USES OF PUBLIC FUNDS 19,891,380
SOURCES OF PUBLIC FUNDS
Cash Balance in TIF District (12/31/99)
2,175,000
Purchase of Land By Developer
3,700,000
Sale of Existing Library
1,000,000
New G.O. Bonds Required
2,795,000
Pay -As- You -Go Note Required
10,221,380
TOTAL SOURCES OF PUBLIC FUNDS
19,891,380
DEBT SUPPORTABLE WITH AVAILABLE INCREMENT 9,865,951
PROJECTED FUNDING GAP (3,150,429)
1 Cost of Kunz -Lewis property accounted for in the repayment of existing debt
used to purchase land.
2 Parking cost decreases by $200,000 without the bus garage.
3 Analysis does not include funding for construction of new bus garage.
Ehlers & Associates, Inc. 10/15/99 Page 1 of 4
PRELIMINARY - For Discussion Only
City of Edina
Opus/Clark - Base Proposal
Estimated Tax Increment
2006
2007 Year Taxes Paid
2005
Total
Total
2002
2003
2004
2005
100%
Total
Per
Market
Tax
2001
2002
2003
2004
Project
Units
Unit
Value
Capacity
2000
2001
2002
2003
Townhomes
190
285,000
54,150,000
799,615
0%
25%
50%
75%
Office
77,000
115
8,855,000
299,570
0%
100%
100%
100%
0
0
0%
0%
0%
0%
0
0
0%
0%
0%
0%
0
0
0%
0%
0%
0%
Total
63,005,000
1,099,185
Total Years of TIF Capture
8.0
Estmiated Annual Value Inflation
0.00%
Tax
Gross
Local
New
Existing
Tax Capacity Values
Extension
Tax
Retained
Semi - Annual
Semi - Annual
Year
Base
Total
Captured
Rate
Increment
2.00%
Increment
Increment
1999
35,393
1.1800
0
2000
35,393
1.1800
0
355,893
355,893
2001
35,393.
1.1800
0
355,893
355,893
2002
35,393
-
-
1.1800
0
355,893
355,893
2003
35,393
499,474
464,081
1.1800
547,616
(10,952)
268,332
355,893
268,332
355,893
2004
35,393
699,378
663,985
1.1800
783,502
(15,670)
383,916
355,893
383,916
355,893
2005
35,393
899,281
863,889
1.1800
1,019,389
(20,388)
499,500
355,893
499,500
355,893
2006
35,393
1,099,185
1,063,792
1.1800
1,255,275
(25,105)
615,085
355,893
615,085
355,893
2007
35,393
1,099,185
1,063,792
1.1800
1,255,275
(25,105)
615,085
355,893
615,085
355,893
2008
35,393
1,099,185
1,063,792
1.1800
1,255,275
(25,105)
615,085
355,893
615,085
355,893
2009
35,393
1,099,185
1,063,792
1.1800
1,255,275
(25,105)
615,085
355,893
615,085
355,893
2010
35,393
1,099,185
1,063,792
1.1800
1,255,275
(25,105)
615,085
355,893
615,085
355,893
Total
8,626,881
(172,538)
8,454,344
7,829,635
2006
2007 Year Taxes Paid
2005
2006 Year Assessed
2004
2005 Year Built
100%
100%
100%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Total
Annual
Tax- Exempt
Pay -As- You -Go Net
Increment
Bonds
Note Increment
711,785
331,509
380,276
711,785
333,735
378,050
711,785
334,705
377,080
1,248,448
335,025
913,423
1,479,617
334,675
1,144,942
1,710,786
333,635
1,377,151
1,941,954
331,885
1,610,069
1,941,954
334,405
1,607,549
1,941,954
330,930
1,611,024
1,941,954
331,680
1,610,274
1,941,954
331,380
1,610,574
Ehlers & Associates, Inc. 10/15/99 Page 2 of 4
PRELIMINARY - For Discussion Only
City of Edina
Opus /Clark - Base Proposal
G.O. Bonds
Date Principal
2/1/01
210,000
2/1/02
210,000
2/1/03
220,000
2/1/04
230,000
2/1/05
240,000
2/1/06
250,000
2/1/07
260,000
2/1/08
275,000
2/1/09
285,000
211110
300,000
2/1/11
315,000
TOTAL
2,795,000
Dated 3/01/2000
Delivery Date 3/01/2000
First Coupon Date 8/01/2000
Bond Year Dollars
$17,727.08
Average Life
6.342 Years
Average Coupon
4.89964%
Net Interest Cost (NIC)
5.12038%
True Interest Cost (TIC)
5.15501%
Rate
Interest
P &I
4.200%
121,508.75
331,508.75
4.300%
123,735.00
333,735.00
4.400%
114,705.00
334,705.00
4.500%
105,025.00
335,025.00
4.600%
94,675.00
334,675.00
4.700%
83,635.00
333,635.00
4.800%
71,885.00
331,885.00
4.900%
59,405.00
334,405.00
5.000%
45,930.00
330,930.00
5.100%
31,680.00
331,680.00
5.200%
16,380.00
331,380.00
868,563.75
3,663,563.75
Ehlers & Associates, Inc. 10/15/99 Page 3 of 4
PRELIMINARY - For Discussion Only
City of Edina
Opus /Clark - Base Proposal
"Pay -As- You -Go" Note
Amount 7,070,951
Rate 9.00%
Start 4/1/00
Date
Accrued
Interest
Principal
Interest
Payment
Available
Increment
Balance
7,070,951
8/1/00
25,526
-
190,138
190,138
190,138
7,096,477
2/1/01
129,203
-
190,138
190,138
190,138
7,225,680
8/1/01
136,131
-
189,025
189,025
189,025
7,361,810
2/1/02
142,256
-
189,025
189,025
189,025
7,504,067
8/1/02
149,143
-
188,540
188,540
188,540
7,653,210
2/1/03
155,854
-
188,540
188,540
188,540
7,809,064
8/1/03
-
105,304
351,408
456,712
456,712
7,703,761
2/1/04
-
110,042
346,669
456,712
456,712
7,593,718
8/1/04
-
230,754
341,717
572,471
572,471
7,362,964
2/1/05
-
241,138
331,333
572,471
572,471
7,121,827
8/1/05
-
368,093
320,482
688,575
688,575
6,753,734
2/1/06
-
384,657
303,918
688,575
688,575
6,369,076
8/1/06
-
518,426
286,608
805,035
805,035
5,850,650
2/1/07
-
541,755
263,279
805,035
805,035
5,308,894
8/1/07
-
564,874
238,900
803,775
803,775
4,744,020
2/1/08
-
590,294
213,481
803,775
803,775
4,153,726
8/1/08
-
618,595
186,918
805,512
805,512
3,535,131
2/1/09
-
646,431
159,081
805,512
805,512
2,888,700
8/1/09
-
675,146
129,992
805,137
805,137
2,213,554
2/1/10
-
705,527
99,610
805,137
805,137
1,508,027
8/1/10
-
737,426
67,861
805,287
805,287
770,601
2/1/11
-
770,601
34,677
805,278
805,287
-
Total
738,114
7,809,064
4,811,341
12,620,406
Ehlers & Associates, Inc. 10/15/99 Page 4 of 4
PRELIMINARY - For Discussion Only
City of Edina
Frauenshuh - Base Proposal
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL
USES OF PUBLIC FUNDS
Library Construction 2,860,000
Senior Center Construction 2,145,000
Bus Garage Construction NA
Offsite Improvements 500,000
Staff /Legal /Consulting 500,000
Kunz -Lewis
0 1
TAGS
0
Bus Garage
0
Noonan
0
Animal Hospital
0
Hair Salon
0
New Bus Garage Site
NA
Demolition
0
Railroad Station/Theater
0
Park
550,000
Parking
6,000,000
Contingency /Finance
1,000,000
Site Development
2,900,000
Subtotal Public Uses
16,455,000
Pay Off Existing Debt 3,594,750 1
Bond Issuance 190,250
TOTAL USES OF PUBLIC FUNDS 20,240,000
SOURCES OF PUBLIC FUNDS
Cash Balance in TIF District (12/31/99)
2,175,000
Purchase of Land By Developer
3,250,000
Sale of Existing Library
1,000,000
New G.O. Bonds Required
7,815,000
Pay -As- You -Go Note Required
6,000,000
TOTAL SOURCES OF PUBLIC FUNDS
20,240,000
DEBT SUPPORTABLE WITH AVAILABLE INCREMENT 9,919,644
PROJECTED FUNDING GAP (3,895,355)
1 Cost of Kunz -Lewis property accounted for in the repayment of existing debt
used to purchase land.
Ehlers & Associates, Inc. 10/15/99 Page 1 of 5
PRELIMINARY - For Discussion Only
City of Edina
Frauenshuh - Base Proposal
Estimated Tax Increment
Ehlers & Associates, Inc. 10/15/99 Page 2 of 5
Total
Total
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007 Year Taxes Paid
Total
Per
Market
Tax
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006 Year Assessed
Project
Units
Unit
Value
Capacity
2000
2`001
20022
2003
2004
2005 Year Build
Village 1
34
170,000
5,780,000
78,574
0%
50%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Village 2
34
170,000
5,780,000
78,574
0%
0%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Place 1
23
325,000
7,475,000
111,976
0%
0%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Place 2
18
325,000
5,850,000
87,633
0%
0%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Place 3
7
325,000
2,275,000
34,080
0%
0%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Retail
10,000
115
1,150,000
37,600
0%
0%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Retail
12,000
115
1,380,000
45,420
0%
0%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Office 1
57,348
115
6,595,020
222,731
0%
50%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Office 2
46,170
115
5,309,550
179,025
0%
0%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Total
41,594,570
875,611
Total Years of TIF Capture
8.0
Fsimisted Annual Value Inflation
0.00%
Tax
Gross
Local
New
Existing
Total
Tax Capacity Values
Extension
Tax
Retained
Semi - Annual
Semi - Annual
Annual
Tax - Exempt
Taxable
Pay- As- You-Go
Year
Base
Thal
Captured
ate
Increment
2.00%
Increment
Increment
Increment
Bonds
Bonds
Note
1999
59,399
1.1800
0
2000
59,399
1.1800
0
355,893
711,785
252,304
217,096
.242,385
355,893
2001
59,399
1.1800
0
355,893
711,785
302,765
217,890
191,130
355,893
2002
59,399
1.1800
-
0
355,893
711,785
302,765
215,760
193,260
-
355,893
2003
59,399
150,652
91,253
1.1800
107,678
(2,154)
52,762.
355,893
817,310
302,765
218,200
296,345
52,762
355,893
2004
59,399
875,611
816,212
1.1800
963,130
(19,263)
471,934
355,893
1,655,652
1,062,765
214,880
378,007
471,934
355,893
2005
59,399
875,611
816,212
1.1800
963,130
(19,263)
471,934
355,893
1,655,652
1,062,805
216,105
376,742
471,934
355,893
2006
59,399
875,611
816,212.
1.1800
963,130
(19,263)
471,934
355,893
1,655,652
1,065,440
216,535
373,677
471,934
355,893
2007
59,399
875,611
816,212
1.1800
963,130
(19,263)
471,934
355,893
1,655,652
1,065,360
216,150
374,142
471,934
355,893
2008
59,399
875,611
816,212
1.1800
963,130
(19,263)
471,934
355,693
1,655,652
1,062,485
214,930
378,237
471,934
355,893
2009
59,399
875,611
816,212
1.1800
963,130
(19,263)
471,934
355,893
1,655,652
1,066,735
217,855
371,062
471,934
355,893
2010
59,399
875,611
816,212
1.1800
963,130
(19,263)
471,934
355,893
1,655,652
1,062,520
219,555
373,577
471,934
355,893
Total
6,849,589
(136,992)
6,712,597
7,829,635
14,542,232
8,608,709
2,384,956
3,548,567
Ehlers & Associates, Inc. 10/15/99 Page 2 of 5
PRELIMINARY - For Discussion Only
City of Edina
Frauenshuh - Base Proposal
G.O. Bonds
Date Principal
2/1/01
0
2/1/02
0
2/1/03
0
2/1/04
0
2/1/05
760,000
2/1/06
795,000
2/1/07
835,000
2/1/08
875,000
2/1/09
915,000
2/1/10
965,000
211111
1,010,000
TOTAL
6,155,000
Dated 4/01/2000
Delivery Date 4/01/2000
First Coupon Date 8/01/2000
Bond Year Dollars
$49,384.17
Average Life
8.023 Years
Average Coupon
4.96862%
Net Interest Cost (NIC)
5.14310%
True Interest Cost (TIC)
5.17870%
Rate
Interest
P &1
0.000%
252,304.17
2521304.17
0.000%
302,765.00
302,765.00
0.000%
302,765.00
302,765.00
0.000%
302,765.00
302,765.00
4.600%
302,765.00
1,062,765.00
4.700%
267,805.00
1,062,805.00
4.800%
230,440.00
1,065,440.00
4.900%
190,360.00
1,065,360.00
5.000%
147,485.00
1,062,485.00
5.100%
101,735.00
1,066,735.00
5.200%
52,520.00
1,062,520.00
2,453,709.17
8,608,709.17
Ehlers & Associates, Inc. 10/15/99 Page 3 of 5
City of Edina
Frauenshuh - Base Proposal
Taxable G.O. Bonds
Date
Principal
2/1/01
125,000
2/1/02
115,000
2/1/03
120,000
2/1/04
130,000
2/1/05
135,000
2/1/06
145,000
2/1/07
155,000
2/1/08
165,000
2/1/09
175,000
2/1/10
190,000
2/1/11
205,000
TOTAL
1,660,000
Bond Year Dollars $10,638.33
Average Life 6.409 Years
Average Coupon 6.81%
Dated 4/01/2000
Delivery Date 4/01/2000
First Coupon Date 8/01/2000
Rate
Interest
P &I
6.100%
92,095.83
217,095.83
6.200%
102,890.00
217,890.00
6.300%
95,760.00
215,760.00
6.400%
88,200.00
218,200.00
6.500%
79,880.00
214,880.00
6.600%
71,105.00
216,105.00
6.700%
61,535.00
216,535.00
6.800%
51,150.00
216,150.00
6.900%
39,930.00
214,930.00
7.000%
27,855.00
217,855.00
7.100%
14,555.00
219,555.00
724,955.83
2,384,955.83
PRELIMINARY - For Discussion Only
City of Edina
Frauenshuh - Base Proposal
"Pay -As- You -Go" Note
Amount 2,104,644
Rate 9.00%
Start 2/1/00
Accrued
- 125,629
61,210
186,839
Available
1,234,585
Date Interest
Principal
Interest
Payment
Increment
Balance
2/1/08
- 137,433
49,638
187,071
187,071
2,104,64T-
8/1/00 -
26,484
94,709
121,193
121,193
2,078,161
2/1/01 -
27,675
93,517
121,193
121,193
2,050,486
8/1/01 -
3,293
92,272
95,565
95,565
2,047,193
2/1/02 -
3,441
92,124
95,565
95,565
2,043,751
8/1/02 -
4,661
91,969
96,630
96,630
2,039,090
2/1/03 -
4,871
91,759
96,630
96,630
2,034,219
8/1/03 -
56,633
91,540
148,172
148,172
1,977,586
2/1/04 -
59,181
88,991
148,172
148,172
1,918,405
8/1/04 -
102,675
86,328
189,004
189,004
1,815,730
2/1/05 -
107,296
81,708
189,004
189,004
1,708,434
8/1/05 -
111,492
76,880
188,371
188,371
1,596,942
2/1/06 -
116,509
71,862
188,371
188,371
1,480,434
8/1/06 -
120,219
66,620
186,839
186,839
1,360,214
2/1/07
- 125,629
61,210
186,839
186,839
1,234,585
8/1/07
- 131,515
55,556
187,071
187,071
1,103,070
2/1/08
- 137,433
49,638
187,071
187,071
965,637
8/1/08
- 145,665
43,454
189,119
189,119
819,972
2/1/09
- 152,220
36,899
189,119
189,119
667,752
8/1/09
- 155,482
30,049
185,531
185,531
512,270
2/1/10
- 162,479
23,052
185,531
185,531
349,791
8/1/10
- 171,048
15,741
186,789
186,789
178,743
2/1/11
- 178,743
8,043
186,786
186,789
-
Total
- 2,104,644
1,443,920
3,548,564
Ehlers & Associates, Inc. 10/15/99 Page 5 of 5
PRELIMINARY - For Discussion Only
City of Edina
Frauenshuh - No Bus Garage
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL
USES OF PUBLIC FUNDS
Library Construction 2,860,000
Senior Center Construction 2,145,000
Bus Garage Construction NA
Offsite Improvements 500,000
Staff /Legal /Consulting 500,000
Kunz -Lewis
0 '
TAGS
0
Bus Garage
0
Noonan
0
Animal Hospital
0
Hair Salon
0
New Bus Garage Site
NA
Demolition
0
Railroad Station/Theater
0
Park
550,000
Parking
4,000,000
Contingency /Finance
1,000,000
Site Development
2,400,000
Subtotal Public Uses
13,955,000
Pay Off Existing Debt 3,594,750 '
Bond Issuance 180,250
TOTAL USES OF PUBLIC FUNDS 17,730,000
SOURCES OF PUBLIC FUNDS
Cash Balance in TIF District (12/31/99)
2,175,000
Purchase of Land By Developer
3,250,000
Sale of Existing Library
1,000,000
New G.O. Bonds Required
7,305,000
Pay -As- You -Go Note Required
4,000,000
TOTAL SOURCES OF PUBLIC FUNDS
17,730,000
DEBT SUPPORTABLE WITH AVAILABLE INCREMENT 9,124,582
PROJECTED FUNDING GAP (2,180,418)
' Cost of Kunz -Lewis property accounted for in the repayment of existing debt
used to purchase land.
Ehlers & Associates, Inc. 10/15/1999 Page 1 of 5
City of Edina
Frauenshuh - No Bus Garage
Estimated Tax Increment
PRELIMINARY - Fu. _.awssion Only
2002
2003
2004
Total
Total
2007 Year Taxes Paid
Total
Per
Market
Tax
Project
Units
Unit
Value
Capacity
Village 1
34
170,000
5,780,000
78,574
Village 2
34
170,000
5,780,000
78,574
Place 1
23
325,000
7,475,000
111,976
Place 2
18
325,000
5,850,000
87,633
Place 3
7
325,000
2,275,000
34,080
Retail
10,000
115
1,150,000
37,600
Retail
12,000
115
1,380,000
45,420
Office 1
57,348
115
6,595,020
222,731
Office 2
0
115
0
0
PRELIMINARY - Fu. _.awssion Only
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007 Year Taxes Paid
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006 Year Assessed
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005 Year Build
0%
50%
100%
100%
100%
100%
0%
0%
100%
100%
100%
100%
0%
0%
100%
100%
100%
100%
0%
0%
100%
100%
100%
100%
0%
0%
100%
100%
100%
100%
0%
0%
100%
100%
100%
100%
0%
0%
100%
100%
100%
100%
0%
50%
100%
100%
100%
100%
0%
0%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Total
36285,020
696,587
Total Years
of TIF Capture
8.0
Estmiated Annual Value Inflation
0.00%
Tax
Gross
Local
New
Existing
Total
Tax Capacity Values
Extension
Tax
Retained
Semi- Annual
Semi- Annual
Annual
Tax - Exempt
Taxable
ay- As- You-Go
Year
Base
Total
Captured
Rate
Increment
2. 0•iL
Increment
Increment
Increment
Bonds
Bonds
Note
1999
59,399
-
-
1.1800
0
2000
59,399
-
1.1800
-
0
355,893
711,785
252,304
148,796
310,685
355,893
2001
59,399
-
-
1.1800
0
355,893
711,785
302,765
151,370
257,650
355,893
2002
59,399
-
1.1800
-
0
355,693
711,785
302,765
151,410
257,610
355,893
2003
59,399
150,652
91.253
1.1800
107,678
(2,154)
52.762
355,893
817,310
302,765
151,055
.363,490
52,762
355,893
2004
59,399
696,587
637,187
1.1800
751,881
(15,038)
368,422
355,893
1,448,628
1,062,765
150,295
235,568
368,422
355,893
2005
59,399
696,587
637,187
1.1800
751,881
(15,038)
368,422
355,893
1,448,628
1,062,805
149,120
236,703
368,422
355,893
2006
59,399
696,687
637,187
1.1800
751,881
(15,038)
368,422
355,893
1,448,628
1,065,440
147,520
235,668
368,422
355,893
2007
59,399
696,587
637,187
1.1800
751,881
(15,038)
368,422
355,893
1,448,628
1,065,360
150,485
232,783
368,422
355,893
2008
59,399
696,587
637,187
1.1800
751,881
(15,038)
368,422
355,893
1,448,628
1,062,485
152,665
233,478
368,422
355,893
2009
59,399
696,587
637,187
1.1800
751,881
(15,038)
368,422
355,893
1,448,628
1,066,735
149,040
232,853
368,422
355,893
2010
59,399
696,587
637,187
1.1800
751,881
(15,038)
368,422
355,893
1,448,628
1,062,520
149,940
236,168
368,422
355,893
Total
5,370,845
(107,417)
5263,428
7,829,635
13,093,063
8,608,709
1,651,696
2,832,658
Ehlers & Associates, Inc. 10115/1999 Page 2 of 6
PRELIMINARY - For Discussion Only
City of Edina
Frauenshuh - No Bus Garage
G.O. Bonds
Date
Principal
Rate
Interest
P&I
2/1/2001
0
0.000%
252,304.17
252,304.17
2/1/2002
0
0.000%
302,765.00
302,765.00
2/1/2003
0
0.000%
302,765.00
302,765.00
2/1/2004
0
0.000%
302,765.00
302,765.00
2/1/2005
760,000
4.600%
302,765.00
1,062,765.00
2/1/2006
795,000
4.700%
267,805.00
1,062,805.00
2/1/2007
835,000,
4.800%
230,440.00
1,065,440.00
2/1/2008
875,000
4.900%
190,360.00
1,065,360.00
2/1/2009
915,000
5.000%
147,485.00
1,062,485.00
2/1/2010
965,000
5.100%
101,735.00
1,066,735.00
2/1/2011
1,010,000
5.200%
52,520.00
1,062,520.00
TOTAL
6,155,000
2,453,709.17
8,608,709.17
Dated 4/01/2000
Delivery Date 4/01/2000
First Coupon Date 8/01/2000
Bond Year Dollars $49,384.17
Average Life 8.023 Years
Average Coupon 4.96862%
Net Interest Cost (NIC 5.14310%
True Interest Cost (TI 5.17870%
Ehlers & Associates, Inc. 10/15/1999 Page 3 of 5
City of Edina
Frauenshuh - No Bus Garage
Taxable G.O. Bonds
Date Principal
2/1/2001
85,000
2/1/2002
80,000
2/1/2003
85,000
2/1/2004
90,000
2/1/2005
95,000
2/1/2006
100,000
2/1/2007
105,000
2/1/2008
115,000
2/1/2009
125,000
2/1/2010
130,000
2/1/2011
140,000
TOTAL
1,150,000
Bond Year Dollars $7,363.33
Average Life 6.403 Years
Average Coupon 6.81%
Dated 4/01/2000
Delivery Date 4/01/2000
First Coupon Date 8/01/2000
Rate
Interest
P &I
6.100%
63,795.83
148,795.83
6.200%
71,370.00
151,370.00
6.300%
66,410.00
151,410.00
6.400%
61,055.00
151,055.00
6.500%
55,295.00
150,295.00
6.600%
49,120.00
149,120.00
6.700%
42,520.00
147,520.00
6.800%
35,485.00
150,485.00
6.900%
27,665.00
152,665.00
7.000%
19,040.00
149,040.00
7.100%
9,940.00
149,940.00
501,695.83
1,651,695.83
PRELIMINARY - For Discussion Only
City of Edina
Frauenshuh - No Bus Garage
"Pay -As- You -Go" Note
Amount 1,819,582
Rate 9.00%
Start 4/11/2000
Accrued
Available
Date Interest
Principal
Interest
Payment
Increment
Balance
1,819,582
8/1/2000 -
73,461
81,881
155,343
155,343
1,746,121
2/1/2001 -
76,767
78,575
155,343
155,343
1,669,354
8/1/2001 -
53,704
75,121
128,825
128,825
1,615,649
2/1/2002 -
56,121
72,704
128,825
128,825
1,559,529
8/1/2002 -
58,626
70,179
128,805
128,805
1,500,902
2/1/2003 -
61,264
67,541
128,805
128,805
1,439,638
8/1/2003 -
116,961
64,784
181,745
181,745
1,322,677
2/1/2004 -
122,224
59,520
181,745
181,745
1,200,452
8/1/2004 -
63,764
54,020
117,784
117,784
1,136,689
2/1/2005 -
66,633
51,151
117,784
117,784
1,070,056
8/1/2005 -
70,199
48,152
118,352
118,352
999,856
2/1/2006 -
73,358
44,994
118,352
118,352
926,498
8/1/2006 -
76,142
41,692
117,834
117,834
850,357
2/1/2007 -
79,568
38,266
117,834
117,834
770,788
8/1/2007 -
81,706
34,685
116,392
116,392
689,082
2/1/2008 -
85,383
31,009
116,392
116,392
603,699
8/1/2008 -
89,573
27,166
116,739
116,739
514,127
2/1/2009 -
93,603
23,136
116,739
116,739
420,523
8/1/2009 -
97,503
18,924
116,427
116,427
323,020
2/1/2010 -
101,891
14,536
116,427
116,427
221,129
8/1/2010 -
108,133
9,951
118,084
118,084
112,996
2/1/2011 -
112,996
5,085
118,081
118,084
-
Total -
1,819,582
1,013,073
2,832,655
Ehlers & Associates, Inc.
10/15/1999
Page 5 of 5
AGENDA ITEM: HRA IL:
October 5, 1999
Mr. M. Dennis Maetzold, Mayor
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Re: Bus Garage on or Adjacent to Our Lady of Grace Property
Dear Mr. Maetzold:
It has come to my attention that several development proposals for the Lewis Engineering site
suggest that the current Edina bus garage be moved on Our Lady of Grace (OLG) land. Please be
advised that I do not support this idea. Furthermore, even if I would support this idea, I would
expect someone to show me a plan describing the idea before suggesting OLG would support this
development plan. To date, I have not been advised about any of these development proposals.
Please give OLG proper notification when developers want our land.
Thank you for your attention on the matter, Please keep me advised about any new development
proposals.
Sincerely,
Reverend Robert T. Cassidy
Pastor .
cc: Mr. Gordon Hughes ✓
October 17, 1999
Mayor Dennis Maetzold
Council Members;
Nan Faust
James Hovland
Scott Johnson
Michael Kelley
Dear Mayor and Council Members;
We write concerning the redevelopment proposals currently under consideration for the Kunz -Lewis site.
We reside at 5301 Pinewood Trail in the Richmond Hills neighborhood. Our home overlooks Sherwood
Park and the proposed redevelopment site. We have been Edina residents since 1978 and have occupied
our present home since 1990.
You currently have four proposals remaining for your consideration. We have ranked them in our order of
preference.
Most preferred:
1. Eden Village. Developers: Jerry's Enterprises, Laukaa -Jarvis & Namron Co.
Acceptable:
2. Edemnoor. Developer: Frauenshuh
3. The Residences at Grandview (no hotel). Developer: Stuart Companies
Unacceptable:
4. Grandview Square. Developers: Ron Clark Construction & Opus Northwest
Our preferred choice is Eden Village.
Positives:
• It preserves the small businesses, which currently serve as a good transition from the residential
neighborhood to the commercial area at Grandview.
• It preserves the neighborhood park.
• Jerry's has the longest history of dealing responsibly with the neighborhood regarding development
issues.
• It directs all new traffic from the Kunz -Lewis site directly onto Eden Avenue, directs bus garage
development traffic onto Vernon Avenue, and appears to have the potential for the least direct traffic
impact on the neighborhood.
• It is the only development proposal for the north side of Eden Avenue which offers the opportunity to
keep traffic on Vernon Avenue rather than Eden Avenue.
Negatives:
• For sale residential near existing residential area is three to four story heights plus the roof.
Acceptable choices
Edenmoor
Positives:
• Housing units closest to the neighborhood are the least tall.
• Developers have a history of considering neighborhood impact.
Negatives:
• Creates a large office and retail space south of Eden Avenue.
• Potential for increased traffic on Sherwood Road.
• Significant increase in traffic on Eden Avenue.
• Removes all small businesses currently providing a buffer to Grandview.
Residences at Grandview
Positives:
• All residential except for library and senior center.
• Least overall traffic impact.
Negatives:
• All rental housing
• Creates primary traffic pattern onto Sherwood Road.
• Bus garage entrance /exit onto Eden Circle is poorly placed.
• No history of soliciting or considering neighborhood input.
Unacceptable choice
Grandview Square
Negatives:
• Traffic for all 190 residential units will be via Sherwood Road creating a substantial traffic increase.
• Residential units are four stories with a one to two story roof.
• Residential units surround the eastern and most of the northern border of the park.
• The unit proposed for the beauty parlor site would rival the highest of the large apartment buildings on
the north side of Vernon Avenue.
• Has commercial uses south of Eden Avenue.
• Proposes a 4 -way intersection at Eden Avenue/Link Road/Eden Circle.
• Has one of the two greatest impacts on total area traffic and the greatest impact on Sherwood Road
traffic.
• Has no history of dealing with the neighborhood (did make a presentation when invited).
• Views Sherwood Park as an exploitable asset. Even in their new plan, they suggest using a portion of
the park. The original plan relocated the park out of the neighborhood.
Our concerns, as they have for nine years, focus on:
• Traffic /neighborhood access.
• Overall height of the development.
• General impact on the neighborhood.
• Developer's interest in dealing with the neighborhood concerns.
We believe Eden Village offers the neighborhood and the City the best redevelopment proposal. Jerry's
Enterprises and their partners have a history of responsible development and have shown an interest in
respectful consideration of neighborhood concerns.
We encourage you to select Eden Village as the development proposal.
Thank you for your consideration,
2
John Menke
6 /2-- 412 L- ZG0 F04
&S'1 - &q3- 3IJ 33Cl--�)
k� e �
�y REQUEST FOR
TO:. Mayor & City Council
FROM: Francis Hoffman, City Engineer/
VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000
DATE: October 19, 1.999 _
AGENDA ITEM. xxA.III
ITEM DESCRIPTION: 501h & France (South Ramp) Waste Management Improvement
Contract 99 -2 (HRA)
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
2. 2
3. 3.
4. 4.
5. 5.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: ,
N/A
GENERAL INFORMATION:
There were no bids for this project, therefore it will be re -bid with the parking ramp project next spring.
Public Works - Engineering
Sign a Department
The Recommended Bid is °
within budget not within udget John,Wallin,.Fihance Director
i
Gor h Hughes, �'lanager
r
COUNCIL
CHECK RL�ISTER
13 -OCT -1999 (1.
j) page 1
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
13486
10/19/99
$83.07
ALBINSON
50th & France waste b
829081
50TH STREET
PROFESSIONAL S
4468
< *>
$83.07*
13487
10/19/99
$28.00
Barden, Keith
Refund parking permit
081199
50TH STREET
PARKING PERMIT
PERMIT #
< *>
$28.00*
13488
10/19/99
$26,627.80
Lund Martin Construction
improvement # 98 -4a
101999
CENTENNIAL LAK
PARKS
< *>
$26,627.80*
13489
10/19/99
$147,239.00
M & S ROOFING
Roofing contract -Edin
4616
EDINBOROUGH
PARKS
CONTRACT
< *>
$147,239.00*
13490
10/19/99
$21.00
Mattson, Wayne
Refund parking permit
093099
50TH STREET
PARKING PERMIT
PRMT 249
< *>
$21.00*
13491
10/19/99
$21.00
Meier, Kathryn
Refund parking permit
093099
50TH STREET
PARKING PERMIT
PERMIT #
< *>
$21.00*
13492
10/19/99
$1,128.60
THOMAS & SONS CONSTRUCTI
Improvement R -16
98 -3
CENTENNIAL LAK
PARKS
< *>
$1,128.60*
$175,148.47*
COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY
FUND # 01 HOUSING & REDEVELOP AUTHOR $175,148.47
$175,148.47*
13 -OCT -1999 (1-2) page 1
'-' MINUTES
OF THE JOINT MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL AND THE
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
HELD AT CITY HALL
OCTOBER 5,1999 - 7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Johnson, and Mayor
Maetzold.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Kelly and seconded
by Member Johnson approving the Council Consent Agenda as presented with the
exception of Agenda Item V.A. Set Hearing Date - Ordinance Amendment Establishing a
Time Limit For Use of an Approved Final Development Plan (October 19,1999).
Rollcall:
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Johnson, Maetzold
Motion carried.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 21 1999 AND SPECIAL
MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 21, 1999 APPROVED Motion made by Member Kelly and
seconded by Member Johnson approving the minutes of the September 21, 1999, Regular
Council Meeting and the September 21,1999, Special Council Meeting.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
VACATION OF UTILITY EASEMENT APPROVED (4617 TOWNES ROAD) Affidavits of
Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file.
Presentation By Engineer
Engineer Hoffman explained the City had received a request from the residents of 4617
Townes Road requesting the vacation of the entire utility easement. The residents intent
originally was to move the existing sewer line, allowing an addition to the existing home.
However, upon further consideration the residents are requesting the City vacate only the
southerly two feet of the easement. This removes an existing encroachment at the northeast
corner of the home and allows for an addition on the westerly end.
Mayor Maetzold asked for public comment. No one appeared to speak.
Member Johnson made a motion to close the public hearing. Member Kelly seconded the
motion.
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold
Motion carried.
Member Kelly introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION VACATING
A PORTION OF THE UTILITY EASEMENT
4617 TOWNES ROAD
WHEREAS, a motion of the City Council, on the 7th day of September 1999, fixed a date
for a public hearing on a proposed utility vacation, and
Page 1
Minutes/Edina Cif Counci]/October 5,1999 '
WHEREAS, two weeks published and posted notice of said hearing was given and the
- hearing- w as-held -on _the_5.th -day ofOctober,1999, at which time all persons desiring to be
heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon, and
WHEREAS, the Council deems it to be in the best interest of the City and of the public that
said easement vacation be made; and
WHEREAS, the Council considered the extent -the vacation affects existing easements
within the area of the vacation and the extent to which the vacation affects the authority of
any person, corporation, or municipality owning or controlling electric, telephone or cable
television poles and lines, gas and sewer lines, or water pipes, mains, and hydrants on or
under the area of the proposed vacation to continue maintaining the same, or to enter upon
such easement area or portion thereof vacated .to maintain, repair, replace, remove or
otherwise attend thereto;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina,
Hennepin County, Minnesota, that the following easement is hereby partially vacated
effective as of October 5,1999:
The south two feet (2') of a permanent ten foot (10') wide easement through Lot 3,
Auditor's Subdivision No. 319 and Lot 9; White Oaks 6th.Addition, the center line
of which easement is described as follows:
Beginning at a point on the east line of said Lot 9, six feet (6') southerly of the
northeast corner of said Lot 9, thence westerly to a point which if five feet (5)
southerly of the northerly line of said Lot 9 and five feet (5') east of the west line of
said Lot 9, both measurements being at right angles to said lot' lines; thence
westerly to a point in the southeasterly line of Townes Road Circle, which .point is
nine feet (9') southwesterly from the most northerly corner of said Lot 3, Auditor's
Subdivision No. 319.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said vacation does not affect, and there are continued,
reserved, and retained, by the said resolution ordering the vacation, the following existing
easements and authority in, on and under the above vacated area:
The authority of Northern States Power Company, US. . West
Communications, Paragon Cable Minnesota, or Minnegasco -to enter upon
the above vacated area for the maintenance; replacement, repair and
removal of and ' for otherwise .attending. to, underground conduit,
manholes, cables, wires and poles required for utility service now in, on or
under the above vacated area.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is authorized and directed to cause a
notice of completion of "proceedings to be prepared, entered, in the transfer, record of the
County Auditor, and filed with the County Recorder, in accordance with Minnesota
Statutes, Section 412.851.
Passed this 5th day of October, 1999. Motion seconded by Member Hovland.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Johnson, Maetzold
Motion carried.
RESOLUTION ADOPTED ORDERING WEST 49 1/2 STREET PARKING RAMP
IMPROVEMENT NO. P -4a AND GRANTING VARIANCE FROM SETBACK Affidavits of
Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file.
Engineering _presentation
Page 2
Minutes/Edina City Council/October 5,1999
Mr. Hoffman explained the Council and the HRA conducted a joint hearing on September 7,
1999, to consider constructing additional parking spaces on the north ramp at 5011, & France.
Since September 7, 1999, staff and consultants have reviewed the project.
Staff, after reviewing the alternatives, recommended an alternative the uses only the Lee
property and existing ramp property. The primary reasons for not using the Hooten Cleaners
site were; 1) private property, 2) relocation of a business, and 3) impact upon more residential
properties. The USBank site was rejected for similar reasons. -
Mr. Hoffman added the "Clancy" surface lot was examined as well because it is a more
centralized location. However Clancy's lot provide a low net gain of spaces, limited truck
access, limited site, eliminate storefront visibility and disrupt centralized existing parking
during construction. He noted that staff has over the past been made aware of the desire to
have some non - structured open parking by businesses for customer who do not wish to park
in a ramp.
Mr. Hoffman reported he met with the neighbors on September 27, 1999, to discuss options
ranging from "no build ": to "full- build" options. The results of the meeting were:
• Additional ramp expansion not justified at this time. Three traffic counts indicate
many open spaces
• Adjacent property owners prefer no further encroachments on their property, i.e.,
visually or on their site
• Do not favor City purchasing properties and reselling to new owners
• Business activity is encroaching upon residential neighbors
• Ramp expansion has negative effect on property values
• Staff has received a packet from the neighborhood which opposes the ramp
expansion
He state potential options that might provide mitigation for the project include:
• Home improvements to the four adjacent residential properties similar to some of
the Metropolitan Airports Commission relating to the Minneapolis /St. Paul
Airport
• Residential landscape easements and landscaping
• Ramp modifications setting back some sections of the north ramp wall allowing for
landscaping or design elements enhancing the north side view
• Providing sound mitigation activities on the interior ramp walls
Mr. Hoffman concluded that a ramp expansion would increase parking spaces by
approximately 90 spaces to 110 spaces if the project were approved. Final design and
mitigation concepts would be developed after the project is approved. Staff would expect the
50th & France Business area to finance any additional expenses occurring north of the north
ramp.
Council comments
Member Kelly asked where funds would come from for landscaping and purchase of the
easement. Mr. Hoffman said the funds would come from the special assessments.
Page 3
Minutes/Edina City Couricil/October 5,1999
Member Faust said after cutting ' out the corner, how would the corner be restored. Mr.
Hoffman described the landscape plan in detail. Member Faust asked further about the cedar
fence. Mr. Hoffman explained the fencing would be for privacy concerns.
Mayor Maetzold asked whether the heavy landscaping would be in lieu of the improvements
similar to the Metropolitan Airport improvements. Mr. Hoffman said the most feasible
approach would be to soundproof the homes. He does not know whether this would be
approved by the neighborhood.
Member Johnson asked if the ramp is approved would there be a broad enough resolution to
achieve the desired outcome. Mr. Hoffman said if the neighbors were to file a claim against
the City we would have to settle it.
Manager Hughes reminded the Council that what is being sought is authorization of the
project with the notch removed and including direction to staff to pursue mitigation, and the
landscaping plan. If neighbors did not want the landscaping, the City would not want to
condemn the property to landscape.
Member Hovland inquired whether a mechanism exists to fund lawsuits if they were to
occur. Mr. Hughes said the total project is partially funded with tax increments as well as
assessments. Ultimately the project would be back before the Council during an assessment
hearing and the cost split decided upon at that time. He cautioned that the north property
line of the ramp is the boundary of the tax increment district. Therefore, it would be difficult
to spend tax increment funds to the north. Staff would recommend that the cost split be
shifted more to the assessment. Member Hovland asked what the cost per stall in the ramp is
at today. Mr. Hoffman said there would be no change to the cost estimate as previously
proposed.
Member Faust asked if the tax increment funds were coming from all of Edina. Mr. Hughes
explained that tax increments come from taxes generated from the TIF District. These funds
are not available for use by the City, School District and the County. Therefore they may only
be used by the City to fund public improvements in this district. It could be argued that since
those dollars are captured in this district, it forces the remainder of the community to pay
higher taxes than would otherwise be paid. The converse of the argument is without the tax
increment district, the development may not have occurred in the first place and therefore,
the extra taxes would be a moot point.
Resident comments
Bill Sleds, representing the commercial corner at 50th & France, voiced his opinion that a
ramp addition is necessary.
John Smaby, Manager of Edina Realty Office adjacent to the parking ramp, stated while they
are sympathetic to homeowners, being in the realty business, this ramp is necessary for the
growth of the 50th & France area. If the ramp is not built, parking will begin spilling into the
neighborhood. He concluded that every day the ramp is full.
Page 4
Minutes/Edina City Council/October 5,1999
Gail Dean, 3925 West 49th Street, commented she was appalled when she surveyed the ramp
and found 68 spaces open in the middle ramp; and 34 in the north ramp. What she finds is
rude people who find it an inconvenience to not park directly next to where they are going.
She suggested reducing the number of 90 minute signs to open up longer parking times. Ms.
Dean said the pictures are deceiving and she is totally against the ramp addition. She believes
a survey should be done of the neighbors and further believes the easement will not be
sufficient.
Kathleen Godfrey, 3938 West 49th Street, and a member of the 50th & France Business
Association, said she had submitted a letter dated September 30, 1999, minutes from a
meeting held September 24,1999, and a petition with numerous signatures affixed. She stated
the need for additional parking has not been substantiated. The ramp expansion and variance
is not an option for the neighborhood.
Lee Wiseman, 4229 Chowen, owner of Fashion Avenue at 4936 France Avenue, stated the
area does need the parking.
Shawna Engelsma, owners of Spalon Montage, said the area has a parking problem. She
added they receive complaints often about no parking spots. She voiced concern that people
will go elsewhere if they can't find a place to park their car.
Pat Tucker, 4705 Upper Terrace, representing the Edina Chamber of Commerce at 7701
Normandale Road, read the position statement submitted by the Chamber dated September
27, 1999, unanimously supporting the proposal to increase vehicle capacity of the north ramp
at 50th and France from their August 26, 1999, board meeting.
Marty Rud, 6222 France Avenue South, elaborated that between 1991 and 1996 the City
began surveying the ramp for potential expansion. Businessowners at 50th & France request
this expansion and encourage the Council's approval.
Roberta Castellano, 4854 France Avenue South, read her submitted letter that her neighbors
should be given credit for their concerns and are not an opposition - without -cause group. Her
letter asked numerous questions about the ramp expansion project.
Richard Cochrane, 3922 West 49th Street, stated that anything higher than two stories would
dominate the neighborhood, much like Uptown, and he does not believe that is what 50th &
France wants to be. He suggested building a ramp over Clancy's lot or the USBank location.
Barbara Zwack, of Chico's on the corner of 50th & France, acknowledged that change is
difficult but it is very important to keep parking within the commercial district.
Jan Monson, 3945 West 49th Street, inquired of Mr. Rud when, in his estimation, peak times
happen. Mr. Rud responded 11:00 A.M,. to 2:00 P.M. She said the most desirable parking lot
is the Talbot's lot and people want to park there leaving other spots empty. She voiced
concern with the proposed plantings and the work it will take to keep them acceptable. Ms.
Monson concluded that her hope is the Council decision to build the ramp is not based on
pressure to spend the tax increment funds on 105 -115 new parking spaces.
Page 5
Minutes/Edina City Council/October 5,1999
Karen- Knudsen,- Executive_Director_ of the 50th & France Association, voiced assurance to the
Council that the Association spends a great deal of time attempting to manage parking as
efficiently as possible and remain good neighbors to the neighborhood. In 1999, over 800
parking 'permits were sold. They are told repeatedly that the #1 concern in the area. is
parking in trying to maintain the vitality of the business district. She said the Association
would very much appreciate more parking availability.
Correspondence was received from Mitchell J. Avery, President of dana's, stating it appears
the site as proposed is the most ideal site for an expansion or addition to parking in the area;
and from Thomas M. Nelson, President, Eberhardt Properties, Inc., supporting the ramp
addition as an intelligent continuation of a model infrastructrue that will benefit the. 50th and
France area owners and neighbors for many years to come.
Member Kelly made a motion to close the public hearing, Member Johnson seconded the
motion.
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold
Motion carried.
Council Comment
Mayor Maetzold said staff has recommended to proceed with the ramp and give staff the
authority to work with the neighbors regarding landscaping, home improvements and
related matters.
Member Kelly stated he believes the proposal is good under the circumstances. He voiced
concern with the difference of opinion of whether we need the parking ramp now. Mr.
Hoffman said each day is different. Mr. Kelly said this is a difficult situation and staff has
handled it well in attempting to mitigate the concern. He said further he has never seen such
a generous mitigation, plan. This is a very important area for Edina. The Council has turned
down expansive plans in the 50th & France area in the past, in an attempt to keep growth at a
reasonable level and this ramp expansion proposal is important to protect the vitality of the
area. Mr. Kelly concluded starting on this project sooner rather than later is appropriate. He
reminded the neighbors they bought their homes near a commercial, district with its risks and
rewards and encouraged the neighbors to work with the plan.
Member Faust said she too had surveyed the area and found various states of fullness in the
ramp. She said while she sympathizes with the neighbors she supports the proposal going
forward.
Member Hovland said this is one of those judgement calls the Council is elected to make. He
indicated it is not easy to live next to a commercial area with no buffer but despite that, he
believes 4911, Street to be a nice street. He looks at the area as a balancing act between private
property and the business community. The Council must balance the interests of both. Mr.
Hovland said he believes staff has done a great job with this solution. He would vote to
expand the ramp.
Page 6
Minutes/Edina City Council/October 5,1999
Member Johnson said in his short tenure on the Council, he has been asked what he has
learned. He responded that residents speaking before the Council are articulate and with
passionate convictions. After much thought, he said he would support the ramp expansion.
Mayor Maetzold concurs with the Council. He stated there are key stakeholders, i.e. residents
and business community. The Council needs to control the growth in the area and maintain it
as a vibrant shopping area. He voiced his support for the ramp expansion.
Member Faust asked when construction would begin. Mr. Hoffman said construction should
begin in the spring and be completed by fall of the year 2000.
Member Kelly made a motion closing the hearing for ramp expansion P4a, the north ramp
at 501h & France. Member Johnson seconded the motion
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold
Motion carried.
A resident asked which plan was being approved. Mr. Hoffman further explained the project
scope which would add approximately 110 parking spaces.
Mayor Maetzold made a motion introducing the following resolution and moving its
adoption:
RESOLUTION ORDERING PARKING
RAMP IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. P-4a
WHEREAS, the Edina City Council on the 3rd day of August, 1999, fixed a date for a
council hearing on the proposed parking ramp expansion, Improvement No. P-4a and
WHEREAS, ten days' mailed notice and two weeks' published notice of the hearing was
given, and the hearing was held thereon on the 7th day of September, 1999, and continued
to October 5, 1999, for Improvement No. P4a expansion of West 491/2 Street Parking ramp,
at which all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Council has duly considered the views of
all persons interested, and being fully advised of the pertinent facts, does hereby
determine to proceed with the construction of said improvement, including all
proceedings which may be necessary in eminent domain for the acquisition of necessary
easements and rights hereby designated and shall be referred to in all subsequent
proceedings as Improvement Project No. P-4a West 491/2 .Street Parking Ramp Expansion
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Improvement Project No. P-4a West 491/2 .Street Parking
Ramp Expansion is hereby ordered as proposed.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that City Engineer is hereby designated as the engineer for
this improvement. The engineer shall cause plans and specifications to be prepared for the
making of such improvement.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the City Engineer shall work with adjacent property owners
to the north of the ramp site to determine the mitigation needed.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council grants a height setback variance from
the north property line.
Adopted this 5th day of October, 1999. Member Faust seconded the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold
Motion carried.
Page 7
Minutes/Edina City Council/October 5,1999
PUBLIC—HEARINGS—CONDUCTED ON SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS: ASSESSMENTS
LEVIED Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Due
notice having been given, public hearings were conducted and action taken as recorded on
the following proposed assessments:
1. STREET IMPROVEMENT NO. A -183
Location: WOODDALE GLEN FROM WOODDALE AVENUE TO CUL DE SAC
Analysis of Assessment for Street Improvement No. A -183 showed five lots assessable with at
$4,889.84 per lot and two lots assessed at the side yard rate of $1,613.64 for a total assessed of
$27,676.48 plus the county charge.
Public Comment
Willard Ott, asked why he had received assessment notices for both $4,889.84 and $1,613.64.
Mr. Hoffman explained that the correct notice was the one for $1,613.64 at the 1/3 rate
because Mr. Ott's backyard was on Wooddale Glen. He went on to note that the Council
could if it chose not assess Mr. Ott, however, would have to sign an agreement with the City
waiving any right of access to Wooddale Lane forever. Mr. Ott indicated that he- would
rather pay the 1/3 assessment. The term of the special assessment shall be ten years
beginning in the year 2000.
Motion of Member-Hovland seconded by Member Faust closing the public hearing for
assessment of Improvement No. A -183.
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold
Motion carried.
Motion made. by Member Johnson and seconded by Member Faust approving the
assessment of Improvement No. A -183 as presented.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Johnson, Maetzold
Motion carried. (Assessment levied by resolution later in Minutes)
2. STREET, CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -319
Location: WOODDALE LANE FROM WOODDALE AVENUE TO CUL DE SAC
Analysis of Assessment for Street, Curb and Gutter Improvement No. BA -319 showed nine
lots assessed at $4,161.64 for a total assessed at $37,454.76. The term of the special assessment
shall be ten years beginning in the year, 2000.
No public comment was heard
Motion of Member Kelly seconded by Member Johnson closing the public hearing for
assessment of Improvement No. BA -319.
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold
Motion carried.
Page 8
.i
Minutes/Edina City Council/October 5,1999
Motion made by Member Hovland and seconded by Member Johnson approving the
assessment of Improvement No. BA -319 as presented.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Johnson, Maetzold
Motion carried. (Assessment levied by resolution later in Minutes)
3. MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENT NO. M -99
Location: 50TH AND FRANCE AVENUE BUSINESS DISTRICT
Analysis of Assessment for Maintenance Improvement No. M -99 showed a total maintenance
cost of $96,027.85 against 339,561 assessable square feet at $0.2828 per square foot. One year
assessment payable in 2000.
No oral or .written objections were heard.
Motion of Member Kelly, seconded by Member Faust closing the hearing for assessment
of Improvement No. M -99.
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold
Motion carried.
Motion made by Member Johnson and seconded by Member Hovland approving the
assessment of Improvement No. M -99 as presented.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Johnson, Maetzold
Motion carried. (Assessment levied by resolution later in Minutes)
4. TREE REMOVAL IMPROVEMENT NO. TR -99
Location: 4600 ARDEN AVENUE
Analysis of Assessment for Tree Removal Improvement No. TR -99 showed one parcel
assessed at $803.25 over three years for removal of a tree at 4600 Arden Avenue.
No public comments were heard.
Motion made by Member Johnson and seconded by Member Hovland closing the hearing
for assessment of Improvement No. M -99.
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold
Motion carried.
Motion made by Member Kelly and seconded by Member Johnson approving the
assessment of Improvement No. TR -99.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Johnson, Maetzold
Motion carried. (Assessment levied by resolution later in Minutes.)
5. TREE TRIMMING IMPROVEMENT NO. TT -98 PHASE II
Page 9
Minutes/Edina City Council/October 5,1999
Location: AREA BOUNDED BY FRANCE AVENUE TO THE EAST, 54TH STREET TO
T -HE- SOU- T- H,- HIGHWAY_1 00 TO THE WEST AND THE CITY LIMITS WITH THOSE
BOUNDARIES TO THE NORTH
A total of 82 trees were trimmed: 521arge trees and 30 small trees for a total cost to be
assessed against the 60 parcels totaling $7,577.36 and payable in 2000.
No public comments were heard.
Motion made by Member Kelly and seconded by Member Hovland closing the hearing for
assessment of Improvement No. TT -98.
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold
Motion carried.
Motion made by Member Hovland and seconded by Member Faust approving
assessments of Improvement No. TT -98, as presented.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold
Motion carried. (Assessment levied by resolution later in Minutes)
6. AQUATIC WEEDS IMPROVEMENT NO AQ -99.
ARROWHEAD AND INDIANHEAD LAKES AND MILLPOND
The area proposed to be assessed for said improvement is as follows: All lots riparian
to Arrowhead Lake and Indianhead Lake and Millpond.
Location: ARROWHEAD LAKE
Analysis of Assessment for Aquatic Weeds Improvement No. AQ -99 for Arrowhead Lake
showed a total cost of $13,804.35 to be assessed against. 35 parcels at $394.41 per parcel. One
year assessment payable in 2000.
No public comments were heard.
Motion made by Member Hovland, seconded by Member Kelly closing the hearing on
Improvement No. AQ -99.
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold
Motion carried.
Motion made by Member Kelly, seconded by Member Faust approving the assessment of
Improvement No. AQ -99, Arrowhead Lake.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold.
Motion carried. (Assessment levied by resolution later in Minutes)
Location: INDIANHEAD LAKE
Page 10
Minutes/Edina City Council/October 5,1999
Analysis of Assessment for Aquatic Weeds Improvement No. AQ -99 for Indianhead Lake
showed a total cost of $12,097.80 proposed to be assessed against 33 homes at $366.60 per
home. One year assessment payable in 2000.
Member Faust asked for more information on the dyes used in Indianhead Lake, and why
dyes are not used on all the treated lakes. City Mr. Hughes said the dye put in the lake
prevents the sun from reaching root plants thereby retarding growth. The association of
Indianhead Lake prefers using the dye process.
Member Hovland inquired what the county charge is that is added to the assessment per
parcel. City Mr. Hughes said the charge is included on all assessments and is a processing fee
for putting the assessment on the tax role.
No public comments were heard.
Motion made by Member Hovland and seconded by Member Kelly closing the hearing on
Improvement No. AQ -99.
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold
Motion carried.
Motion made by Member Faust and seconded by Member Kelly approving the assessment
of Improvement No. AQ -99, Indianhead Lake.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold
Motion carried. (Assessment levied by resolution later in Minutes)
Location: MILLPOND
Analysis of Assessment for Aquatic Weeds Improvement No. AQ -99 for Millpond showed a
total cost of $4,209.00 proposed to be assessed against 63 homes at $66.80 per home. One year
assessment payable in 2000.
Member Hovland made a motion, seconded by Member Kelly closing the hearing of
Improvement AQ -99.
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold
Motion carried.
Motion made by Member Faust and seconded by Member Hovland approving the
assessment
of Improvement No. AQ -99, Millpond.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Faust, Hovland; Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold
Motion carried. (Assessment levied by resolution later in Minutes)
The proposed assessment rolls are now on file in the office of the City Clerk and are open to
public inspection.
Following presentation of the analysis of assessments and approval, Member Hovland
introduced the following resolution and moved adoption:
Page 11
Minutes/Edina City CouncilVOctober 5, 1999
RESOLUTION LEVYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
FOR _V_ARIOUS_P_UBLIC_IMPROVEMENTS AND PROJECTS
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Edina City
Council has met and heard and passed upon all written and oral objections to the
proposed assessments for the improvements listed below:
Street Improvement No. A -183
Street Improvement No. BA -319
Maintenance Improvement No. M -99
Tree Removal Improvement No. TR -99
Tree Trimming Improvement No. TT -98, Phase 2
Aquatic Weeds Improvement No. AQ -99
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows:
1. Each assessment as set forth in the assessment rolls on file in the office of the
City Clerk for each aforementioned improvement is hereby accepted and shall constitute
the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein
included is hereby found to be benefited by the improvement in the amount of the
assessment levied against it.
2. The assessments shall be payable in equal installments, the first of said
installments, together with interest at a rate of seven and one half (71h %)percent per
annum, on the entire assessment from the date hereof to December 31, 2000, to be payable
with the general taxes for the year 2000. To each subsequent installment shall be added
interest at the above rate for one year on all then unpaid installments. The number of such
annual installments shall be as follows:
NAME OF IMPROVEMENT NO. OF INSTALLMENTS
Street Improvement No. A -183, Levy No. 14705 10_ years
Street Improvement No. BA -319, Levy No. 14706 10 years
Maintenance Improvement No. M -99, Levy No. 14699 1 year
Tree Removal Improvement No.TR -99, Levy N, o. 14704 3 years
Tree Trimming Improvement No. TT -98, Levy No. 14702 1 year
Aquatic Weeds Improvement No. AQ -99, Levy No. 14703 1 year
3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification
of assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property,
with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest
shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this
resolution and they may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire
amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to.December 31 of the
year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or
interest will be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year.
4. The clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to
the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such
assessment shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes.
Adopted this 5th day of October, 1999.
Motion for adoption of the resolution seconded by Member Faust
Rollcall:
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Johnson, Maetzold
Resolution adopted.
Page 12
Minutes/Edina City Council/October 5,1999
HEARING DATE SET OF OCTOBER 19 1999 FOR ORDINANCE AMENDMENT
ESTABLISHING A TIME LIMIT FOR USE OF AN APPROVED FINAL DEVELOPMENT
PLAN Member Faust said she removed the hearing date set of October 19, 1999, for
Ordinance Amendment Establishing a Time Limit for Use of an Approved Final
Development Plan for further clarification.
Mr. Hughes replied that both issues will be heard, but only the zoning ordinance amendment
requires a public hearing.
Member Faust made a motion setting the hearing date of October 19, 1999, for ordinance
amendment establishing a time limit for use of an approved final development plan.
Member Hovland seconded the motion.
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold
Motion carried.
COMMERCIAL PHOTOGRAPHY PERMIT GRANTED 4602 GOLF TERRACE Mr.
Hughes informed the Council that Hometime Video Productions, Inc., is a production
company that produces the nationally broadcast PBS show called Hometime. It is a program
that documents home remodeling and is seen locally on KTCA TV.
Hometime Video Production purchased the home at 4602 Golf Terrace where they have plans
to film nine, thirty - minute programs for future broadcast. Filming started in June and they
expect to be filming for 25 more days. Once the staff at Hometime Video Production realized
they needed a permit, they applied for that permit. Hometime before permits were required.
The reason for the hearing before the Council is the Code requires Council approval if
filming lasts longer than ten days.
Dean Johnson, President of Hometime Video Productions, Inc., explained the production
schedule and the way the home at 4602 Golf Terrace is being remodeled.
Following a brief Council discussion, Member Johnson closed the public hearing and
Member Hovland seconded the motion.
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold
Motion carried.
Member Hovland made a motion granting the issuance of a Commercial Photography
Permit to Hometime Video Productions, Inc., at 4602 Golf Terrace. Member Johnson
seconded the motion.
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold
Motion carried.
USWEST WIRELESS ANTENNA REQUEST APPROVED FOR FOX MEADOW LANE
AND BLAKE ROAD Assistant Manager Anderson explained USWest Wireless requested to
co- locate on a civil defense tower on the southeast corner of Blake Road and Fox Meadow
Lane. Their request is to place three antennas fifteen feet higher than the existing civil defense
site. He added the proposal would have USWest construct a new pole on City parkland and
Page 13
Minutes/Edina City Council/October 5,1999
move the civil defense siren to the top of the new pole and place three panel antennas below
the site. USWest would also construct some base station cabinets on the parkland next to the
tower. USWest would pay the City $750 a month to lease the site. Staff presented gra
describing the proposal and discussing the lease terms.
Dale Kasper, and Anthony Segale, Executive Director, USWest Wireless, explained the base
cabinets as well as the entire installation.
Member Kelly made a motion approving the USWest Wireless Antenna Request for co-
location at Blake Road and Fox Meadow Lane subject to approval of the landscape plan for
the site. Member Johnson seconded the motion.
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold
Motion carried."
*MINUTE CORRECTION FOR AUGUST 26, 1999, LOT DIVISION FOR 6204 FOX
MEADOW LANE AND 5204 BLAKE ROAD SOUTH, CHANGE OF LEGAL
DESCRIPTION Motion made by Member Kelly and seconded by Member Johnson
approving the Minutes correction of August 3,1999, legal description for Lot Division for
6204 Fox Meadow Lane and 5204 Blake Road South, as follows: (new text is underlined)
"WHEREAS, the following described properties are at present single tracts of land:
PARCEL 1: Lot 5, Block 1 OAK PONDS OF INTERLACHEN, according to the recorded
plat thereof, Hennepin County; Minnesota.
PARCEL 2: Tract B, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1404, according to the
recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota
WHEREAS, the owners have requested the subdivision of said tracts into separate parcels
(herein called "Parcels ") described as follows:
PARCEL 1: Lot 5, Block 1 OAK PONDS OF INTERLACHEN, according to the recorded
plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota; and the west 25 feet of Tract B;
REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1404 as measured along the north and south lines
thereof.
PARCEL 2: Tract B, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY No. 1404, except the west 25.00 feet
as measured along the north and south lines thereof."
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
DECISION RESOURCES COMMUNITY SURVEY REPORT PRESENTED Mr. Hughes
introduced Dr. William Morris, President of Decision Resources, Ltd. Dr. Morris presented an
overview of the survey that he undertook on behalf of the City. He introduced Mark Koegler
from Hoisington Koegler who would explain further about how the results will move the
City into the next phase of the 20/20 vision planning process.
Dr. Morris explained that:
400 residents of the City were randomly selected
Interview took average of 25 minutes
• Results were completed via telephone between July 15 and August 2,1999.
He summarized that:
Page 14
Minutes/Edina City Council/October 5,1999
♦
69 percent of those surveyed approved of the job performance of the Mayor and
Council. Lower ratings stemmed from "zoning issues", "spending" and "the former
mayor".
♦
90 percent felt the City has "about the right" number of service and retail
establishments and parks and open spaces.
♦
88 percent of those surveyed felt the City has "about the right" number of service
and retail establishments and parks and open spaces.
♦
85 percent regarded age diversity in the City as "about right ".
♦
71 percent saw the number of entertainment and dining establishments as "about
right" but 28 percent thought there were "too few ".
♦
68 percent felt the number of condominiums and townhouses as "about right" but
14 percent saw "too few" and 8 percent saw "too many ".
♦
64 percent thought income diversity was "about right" while 27 percent thought
there was "too little ".
♦
59 percent rated the number of trails and bike paths as "about right: while 26
percent felt there were "too few ".
♦
59 percent rated the number of sidewalks as "about right" while 36 percent saw it
as "too little ".
♦
57 percent thought the number of housing opportunities for the elderly was "about
right ": but 21 percent thought there were "too few ". Twenty -one percent were
uncertain.
♦
55 percent labeled the number of rental housing units as "about right; 14 percent
thought there were "too few; and 6 percent felt there were "too many ". The
remaining 25 percent were unsure.
♦
47 percent thought the amount of racial diversity in the community was "too little,"
but 45 percent saw it as "about right."
Mr. Anderson noted that although "Edina 20/20" was to be completed. by this fall, but there is
about six months more work to be done.
Mark Koegler, Hoisington Koegler Group, explained the survey was a catalyst to glean
information for the 20/20 Vision process which will now begin in November.
No Council action was taken.
RESOLUTION ADOPTED APPROVING LEVY CERTIFICATION FOR TAX RATE
INCREASE Mr. Hughes noted a new law that all cities over 500 population must pass a
resolution if the levy for the subsequent year will result in a tax rate increase. Under the law,
the County Auditor is required to provide information to affected cities and the County
Board that will allow the City to calculate what its tax rate would be in the coming year if the
levy was held constant. Essentially, a baseline tax rate is computed based on the prior year's
levy and the current year tax base. The Resolution only has to affirm that the "levy
certification tax rate" will increase, it does not have to specify an amount of increase. The
Resolution is required to be filed with the County Auditor by October 20th.
Member Johnson made a motion seconded by Mayor Maetzold closing the public hearing
authorizing a tax rate increase for the 1999 tax levy, collectible in 2000.
Page 15
Minutes/Edina City Council/October 5,1999
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold '
Motion_carried.
Following a brief Council discussion, Member Hovland introduced the following resolution
and moved its adoption.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A TAX RATE INCREASE
FOR THE 1999 TAX LEVY, .
COLLECTIBLE IN 2000
BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Edina, County of Hennepin,
Minnesota, that the County Auditor is authorized to fix a property tax rate for taxes
payable in the year 2000 that is higher than the tax rate calculated pursuant to Minnesota
Statues §275.078 for the City for taxes levied in 1998, collectible in 1999.
Adoption of this resolution does not prohibit the City from certifying a final levy
that will result in no tax rate increase or a tax rate decrease.
The City Clerk is hereby instructed to transmit a certified copy of this resolution to
the county auditor of Hennepin County Minnesota.
Adopted by the City Council on October 5, 1999.
Attest:
City Clerk Mayor
Motion for adoption of the resolution was seconded by Member Johnson.
Rollcall: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold
Resolution adopted.
CLAIMS PAID Motion made by Member Kelly approving payment of the following
claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated September 29,1999„ and consisting
of 29 pages: General Fund $312,503.59; C.D.B.G. $15,000.00; Communications $375.45;
Working Capital $11,804.85; Art Center $15,006.78; Golf Dome Fund $163.84, Swimming
Pool Fund $379.30, Golf Course Fund $22,359.01;. Ice Arena Fund $8,613.88;
Edinborough/Centennial Lakes $10,477.87; Utility Fund $304,032.06; Storm Sewer Utility
Fund $7,798.18; Liquor Dispensary Fund $203,229.56; Construction Fund $734.90; TOTAL
$912,479.27. Member Faust seconded the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Johnson, Maetzold
Motion carried.
There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Maetzold adjourned the
Council Meeting at 10:10 p.m.
City Clerk
Page 16
._ - �4
11
REPORURECOMMENDATION
To: '
Mayor & City Council
Agenda Item: II. A.
From:
Craig Larsen
Consent ❑
City Planner
Information Only ❑
Date:
October 19, 1999
Mgr. Recommends ❑
To HRA
®
To Council
Subject:
Amendment to the
Action ❑
Motion
Zoning Ordinance
❑
Resolution
®
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Recommendation:
The Planning Commission recommends first reading for the attached
amendment'to the Zoning Ordinance.
Info /Background:
The attached amendment would place a two year limit for beginning work on an
approved Final. Development Plan. Currently, there is no limit. The amendment also
affects Final Development Plans which have been approved in the past, but not used.
These approved plans would lapse two years after the effective date of the amendment.
The amendment does not affect the zoning of a property, but only affects the
development plan within the constraints of the particular zoning district.
ORDINANCE NO. 1999 -
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE (NO. 850)
BY ESTABLISHING A TIME LIMIT TO DRAW A BUILDING PERMIT
FOR AN APPROVED FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section I. Subsection 850.04, Subdivision 2, paragraph C of Section 850 of the
Edina City Code is amended by adding the following subparagraph:
11. Lapse of approved Final Development Plan by Non - User., Extension of Time.
a. If a building permit (if one is required) has not been obtained, and if
demolition, erection or alteration of a building, as described in petition, has
not begun, within two years after final development plan approval, the
approval shall be null and void unless a petition for extension of time in which
to commence the proposed work or improvements has been granted.
b. A petition for extension shall in writing and filed with the City Clerk with
such two year period. The petition shall state reasons showing why a building
permit has not been obtained, or why the approved alterations have not
commenced, and shall state the additional time requested to begin the
proposed work or improvement. The petition shall be presented to the
Council for hearing and decision in the same manner as then required for an
original application. The Council may grant an extension of up to one year
upon finding that:
i. there is a reasonable expectation that the proposed work or
improvement will commence during the extension, and
ii. the facts which were the basis for approving the final
development plan have not materially changed. No more than
one extension shall be granted.
Section 2. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage and publication. For
purposes of this ordinance final development plan approved prior to the effective date
shall be considered to have been approved as of the effective date.
Draft P.C. Minutes September 29, 1999
B. Zoning Ordinance Lapse of Approval for Final Development Plan
Chairman Johnson asked Mr. Larsen what the other issue he wants discussed.
Mr. Larsen told Commission Members around eight years ago the Commission and
Council heard and approved a plan by Kenneth Durr to rezone and redevelop two
residential lots to commercial. Mr. Larsen added some of you probably remember that
rezoning. Continuing, Mr. Larsen explained at this time Mr. Durr is just beginning to
develop those lots, and there have been ownership changes in the neighborhood during
the past eight years. Mr. Larsen explained newer members of the neighborhood have now
expressed their feelings that the rezoning should be reheard because of the lapse of time,
and changes in the area. This process is allowed under City Ordinance, and the only
thing that would trigger another hearing would be if the final development plan was not
acted on within two years, and the use conflicted with the Comprehensive Plan. The use
of the Durr site does not conflict with the Comprehensive Plan and development of the site
has started.
The question the Council has raised is if this approach is correct. Mr. Larsen said
he has spoken with Mr. Gilligan, City Attorney, and Mr. Gilligan indicated he believes once
the property is rezoned the zoning remains. Continuing, Mr. Larsen said a rezoning is a
two -part process, the second part being the final development plan. Mr. Larsen said at this
time there are no time limits on the final development plan so once a plan is approved the
plan can be constructed any time even if the neighborhood changes.
Mr. Larsen said staff is now recommending that a time limit be placed on the final
development plan. Mr. Larsen said he feels this is reasonable.
Chairman Johnson said what staff is requesting is an amendment to the Ordinance.
Mr. Larsen said that is correct.
Chairman Johnson told the Commission he has received telephone calls from new
neighbors that did not know about the rezoning when they purchased their homes, and
indicated to him they want another hearing.
Mr. Larsen said he has also received calls, and met with impacted neighbors.
Continuing, Mr. Larsen said what staff wants from the Commission is for them to
recommend to the Council that we insert a time limit on final development plan approvals
similar to what we do on conditional use permits. Staff would like to see once a rezoning
and final development plan is approved, and if a building permit is not issued within two
years the ability to development the site needs to be revisited. Mr. Larsen said he
believes after two years the proponent should be required to ask for a time extension and
go through the process again. This gives the City more control over the process and
allows input from neighbors not familiar with what has happened in the past.
Commissioner Swenson questioned if the City Attorney has a problem with the
amendment. Mr. Larsen responded Mr. Gilligan does not have a problem with putting a
time line on the final development plan, the zoning still stands.
5
Commissioner Swenson said if she understands correctly only a change from the
Comprehensive Plan would prevent the previous approval from being developed. Mr.
Larsen said that is correct. Amending the Ordinance would allow new neighbors to be part
of the process.
Commissioner Swenson moved to recommend that after a Final Development Plan
is approved, and if no building permits have been issued within two years the Final
Development Approval lapses and needs to be reheard. Commissioner Ingwalson
seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried.
L
o e
�4 Cl)
Me
°
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To:
Mayor & City Council
From:
Craig Larsen
City Planner
Date:
October 19, 1999
Subject:
Subdivision Hearing
Process
Recommendation:
No recommendation.
Info /Background:
°
Agenda .Item: II. B.
See attached memo from Planning Commission Chair and Planning Commission
Minutes.
Consent ❑
Information Only
Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
❑ To Council
Action ❑ Motion
❑ Resolution
❑ Ordinance
°
❑ Discussion
See attached memo from Planning Commission Chair and Planning Commission
Minutes.
oft I
Memo
To: Mayor Maetzold and members of the City Council
From: Gordon Johnson, Chairman of Planning Commission
Date: October 14, 1999
Re: Subdivision hearing process
The Planning Commission, on September 29, discussed policy relating to
consideration of subdivision proposals. The goal of the discussion was to avoid a
repeat of the events surrounding the subdivision request on Waterman Avenue. It
was the sense of the Commission that the requirements for the initial application are
adequate. Staff will not accept an application until all information required by
ordinance are submitted. The difficulty lies with proposals which are altered once
the hearing process is started.
In this particular case the developer presented a revised plan at the Commission
meeting. Neither City staff nor the neighbors had reviewed the revised plan prior to
the meeting. In addition, the developer requested that the Commission take an
action allowing the request to move forward to the Council. Ultimately, the
Commission voted to recommend denial, allowing the proposal to go to the Council.
There was consensus among Commissioners that adopting a formal policy could not
prevent a developer from presenting a revised plan at a meeting. Further, a policy
would limit the Commission's flexibility in dealing with varying circumstances. In that
light the Commission decided not to adopt a rigid formal policy, but instructed staff to:
Accept only complete applications for initial review by Planning Commission
• Advise developers that if staff does not have adequate time to review and
recommend on revisions the Commission will likely delay action until a report
is provided.
• Page 1
Draft P. C. Minutes September 29, 1999
III. OTHER BUSINESS:
A. Discussion on policy concerns,, application and changes.
Mr. Larsen addressed the Commission and told them he has two items to discuss
this evening. One of the items originated from the Commission at their most recent
meeting. The Waterman subdivision. Mr. Larsen asked the Commission to recall that at
that meeting there were a number of motions, motions to continue, motions to deny,
motions to approve, etc. Mr. Larsen said the confusion was understandable, but it sent a
chaotic message to the Council when they read the minutes from that meeting.
Mr. Larsen told the Commission the Council wants to see a clear recommendation
from them. Mr. Larsen acknowledged he was part of the confusion. Mr. Larsen asked the
Commission to recall the confusion during that meeting was caused by the proponent
submitting a "'revised" plan at the last minute, with staff making the decision to hear the
revised plan that same evening.
Mr. Larsen acknowledged the way the Waterman subdivision was presented did not
allow staff, the Commission, or impacted neighbors adequate time to study the revised
plan. Mr. Larsen said it was a difficult situation, and asked the Commission to share their
feelings aboutJhat meeting, and if they believe a policy is need. Mr. Larsen cautioned that
creating a rigid policy may not be the answer because there will be times the Commission
may want flexibility.
Mr. Larsen explained at present the Ordinance spells out what is needed for
submission of a subdivision proposal. There is also a deadline for submission which
allows staff time to review the proposal. Mr. Larsen pointed out the, problem isn't with an
initial proposal, but a proposal that changes. A solution to having to make a decision on a
revised plan without adequate review time would be for the Commission to continue the
hearing if they felt uncomfortable making a decision.
Chairman Johnson interjected as he recalls at the Waterman hearing the
proponents submitted a revised plan at the last minute with incomplete information. The
Commission at some point during the discussion offered to continue the hearing to a
future date allowing the proponents time to submit complete information. The proponents
indicated they did not want a continuance, but a decision from the Commission either up or
down. The proponents expressed their desire to go before the Council.
Mr. Larsen acknowledged that was the case at that meeting.
Commissioner Ingwalson interjected that during his years as a Commission Member
he does not recall a time when a proponent submitted a revised plan at the meeting.:
Commissioner McClelland said in her opinion part of the confusion during that
meeting occurred because the proponent at that time had two proposals on the floor, a 6
lot subdivision and a revised 5 lot subdivision, and the Commission couldn't be sure which
plan would be brought before the Council. Commissioner McClelland also pointed out
staff reminded the Commission of the time limit on an active proposal. Commissioner
McClelland added she would like a time frame for a revised submittal. She said if a plan is
revised by the proponent the revision must be in the hands of the planner at minimum the
Friday before the Planning Commission meeting. Continuing, Commissioner McClelland
pointed out the Waterman proposal had significant issues to be addressed, (retaining
Walls, drainage) noting the Commission has at times approved plans with minor changes,
sending the item on to Council
Mr. Larsen agreed. He told the Commission in his opinion it is good the Council
reviews the minutes, it indicates they appreciate input and the recommendation from the
Planning Commission.
Commissioner Swenson asked Mr. Larsen if the Commission has to ask the
proponent their preference, continuance or a vote up or down, or can they continue the
hearing to the next Commission meeting without input from the proponent.
Mr. Larsen said the Commission can continue the hearing, vote it up or down, but
the proponent has the right to go forward to the Council.
Commissioner Byron asked Mr. Larsen if the Council made their decision on the
Waterman proposal at one hearing. Mr. Larsen responded the Council heard the
Waterman request for subdivision once. Continuing, Mr. Larsen explained there are three
weeks between the Planning Commission meeting and the City Council meeting and
during that time staff from Planning and Engineering reviewed the revised plan, and the
Council had complete information.
Commissioner Ingwalson said in his opinion the problem was that the Commission
was in favor of the five lot proposal, but there were so many unanswered questions it was
difficult to make an educated decision.
Commissioner McClelland said she agreed, but with a denial the Council had no
way to tell what we actually felt.
Commissioner Ingwalson stated he was not willing to send on to the Council an
incomplete plan, and that is what the Commission had before them.
Commissioner Workinger pointed out that evening the Commission was not "dealt a
full hand ", and did the best it could under the circumstances by giving the Council the
opportunity to hear it. Commissioner Workinger said he was very uncomfortable with the
process that evening, and did not enjoy being put in that position.
Chairman Johnson asked Mr. Larsen if the Waterman project will proceed. He
stated he heard that soil problems were found on the site. Mr. Larsen said he believes it
will move forward, but agreed that because of the soil conditions found on the site it will be
very expensive to remove all the debris and refill the site with clean fill. This finding was
2
the main reason the proponents went forward to the Commission with the same 6 lot plat,
but revised it to 5 at the last minute.
Commissioner Lonsbury asked Mr. Larsen if the Commission should have a
"Waterman" policy. The policy would be if all information is not received in a timely
fashion, the Commission will table it and move on.
Commissioner Byron asked Mr. Larsen what policy he was following that evening.
Mr. Larsen responded he was following City policy. He explained when a complete
application is received it is put on the agenda, and first heard by the Commission, but once
the hearing process begins it is the choice of the Commission on how to act on the
submitted proposal. Mr. Larsen said what he needs from the Commission is a policy to
avoid another Waterman. The policy could be a time limit for submittal of a revised plan
as mentioned by Commissioner McClelland.
Commissioner Byron said if he understands correctly there is already a policy for
submission of an application. Mr. Larsen said that is correct. He added it wasn't until the
Monday before the Commission meeting that staff learned the proponent would submit a 5
lot plat. Mr. Larsen said the reason he felt the Commission could hear the 5 lot plat was
because 5 lots were recommended by staff at the first hearing.
Commissioner Byron told Mr. Larsen he is still not sure if City policy was followed.
Mr. Larsen said policy was followed, reiterating that the Monday before the Commission
meeting the proponents indicated they would be submitting a 5 lot plat to the Commission,
not the 6 lot plat previously heard and sent again to the Commission. Mr. Larsen said
what.occurred that evening could not be helped, but the Commission has to decide on how
they want to handle a situation like the one presented to them that evening.
Commissioner McClelland stated the Commission has been very responsive in the
past to minor changes to a plat, but the Waterman plat had some major issues to address,
the retaining wall, grading, and drainage.
Commissioner Ingwalson said in his opinion the Commission did the best they could
under the circumstances. Continuing, Commissioner Ingwalson said in reality no one can
predict what will occur at meetings, and the Commission should be allowed the flexibility to
review the plans as presented.
Commissioner Lonsbury said tie believes to avoid confusion in the future any
motion by a Commission Member must be clearly stated explaining the reason the
Commission is either approving, denying, or continuing an item. The Council needs clear
direction from us and reasons for'our actions. Commission Members agreed with
Commissioner Lonsbury's statement.
Commissioner Byron said in the public hearing process he notes things that are
occurring. In the Waterman instance the hearing was the second hearing, and staff had
made a recommendation for a 5 lot plat. In reviewing a proposal he listens to signals from
staff, and that is an important part of the process. Commissioner Byron added staff input
3
is part of what makes the process work, adding he doesn't want to see a rigid policy
drafted that does not allow the Commission or staff some flexibility.
Mr. Larsen said in the Waterman instance he worked with the proponent for one
year, and listened to different proposals. The proponent indicated to him they needed the
6 lot plat because so much debris was found on the site that a 5 lot plat may not be
financially feasible. Members of the neighborhood were also aware of the previous
proposals and indicated to him the week of the hearing they could support 5 or 6 lots.
Staff did recommend approval of 5 lots. Mr. Larsen said this information was difficult to
pass on to the Commission in a timely fashion.
Commission Members were in agreement that each proposal should be viewed on
it's individual merits, and any decision made by them should be based on those merits.
Continuing, the Commission indicated they will rely on staff to ensure that all applications
are complete, and if not complete staff will recommend a continuance. Commission
Members also noted if changes occur during the hearing process the Commission will act
on those changes according to their merits, by either continuing the hearing, or approving
the proposal or denying it. The Commission indicated they do not feel a change in policy
is needed.
Commissioner Swenson asked Mr. Larsen what he wants sent to Council
Mr. Larsen said the Commission should send this discussion forth to the Council
and if the Council believes the Commission should be more rigid in their review process
they will indicate that to us.
2
O
JOBS
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: '
Mayor & City Council
Agenda Item: :11. C.
From:
Craig Larsen
Consent
City Planner
Information Only ❑
Date:
October 19, 1999
Mgr. Recommends ❑
To HRA
®
To Council
Subject:
Comprehensive Plan
Action ❑
Motion
Extension.
®
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Recommendation:
Approve Resolution requesting extension to December 31, 1999, for submittal of
Comprehensive Plan to Metropolitan Council.
Info /Background:
The City's "draft" Plan is currently being reviewed by the County, adjacent
school districts and municipalities. The extension is needed to allow time to receive all
comments.
I
.AGENDA ITEM III.B.
,ITEM DESCRIPTION: Salt for Snow & Ice - Control
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
1. Cargill, Inc. (State Contract #424404) 1. $ 24.82/Ton
2. 2.
3. 3.
4. 4•
5.. 5•
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Cargill, Inc. $ 24.82/Ton
GENERAL INFORMATION:
This is the annual purchase for road salt used for snow and ice control. This price is the low bid
received for state purchase. The City does purchase from the State contract and expends
approximately $40,000 to $50,000 per winter season, depending on the conditions. This purchase is
funded through the general Public Works budget.
Public Works - Streets
signatur4 Department
The Recommended Bid is °
within budget not within budget J n al li finance Director
REQUEST FORPURCHAS.E
TO:
Mayor & City Council
FROM:
Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works
VIA:
Gordon Hughes; City Manager
SUBJECT:
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000
DATE:
19 October, 1999
I
.AGENDA ITEM III.B.
,ITEM DESCRIPTION: Salt for Snow & Ice - Control
Company Amount of Quote or Bid
1. Cargill, Inc. (State Contract #424404) 1. $ 24.82/Ton
2. 2.
3. 3.
4. 4•
5.. 5•
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Cargill, Inc. $ 24.82/Ton
GENERAL INFORMATION:
This is the annual purchase for road salt used for snow and ice control. This price is the low bid
received for state purchase. The City does purchase from the State contract and expends
approximately $40,000 to $50,000 per winter season, depending on the conditions. This purchase is
funded through the general Public Works budget.
Public Works - Streets
signatur4 Department
The Recommended Bid is °
within budget not within budget J n al li finance Director
ok e
\" ss i
9A
REP ORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
Agenda Item
IV.A.
From: VINCE BONGAARTS
Consent
TRAFFIC SAFETY COORDINATOR
Information Only ❑
Date: OCTOBER 199 1999
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To BRA
®
To Council
Subject: TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF
❑
Motion
REVIEW OF OCTOBER 69
❑
Resolution
1999
El
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve Traffic Safety Staff Review of October 6, 1999
TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 5, 1999
The staff review of traffic safety matters occurred on October 5, 1999. Staff present
included the Police Chief, the City Engineer, the Assistant City Engineer, the City
Planner, the Traffic Safety Coordinator.
From that review, the below recommendations are provided. On each of the items,
persons involved have been contacted and the staff recommendation has been
discussed with them. They have also been informed that if they disagree with the
recommendation or have additional facts to present, they can be included on the
October 19, 1999, Council Agenda.
SECTION A:
Requests on which the staff recommends approval.
1. The Police Department has requested a "Stop Ahead" warning sign for
southbound traffic on Malibu Drive approaching the intersection of Park Terrace.
Because of a hill and curve some of the traffic approaching the intersection at
Park Terrace is not prepared to stop and need some pre- warning.
The staff recommends the installation of a "Stop Ahead" warning sign on Malibu
Drive north of the intersection at Park Terrace for southbound traffic.
2. A request by the Police Department for a "30 MPH" speed limit sign on Malibu
Drive for northbound traffic between Telemark Trail and Park Terrace.
This is a straight stretch of road with an average daily traffic of 1425 vehicles and
an 85 percentile speed of 35 -36 MPH. The Police Department has been doing
some speed enforcement in this area but feel that maybe a "30 MPH" speed sign
would also help as a reminder.
The staff recommends a "30 MPH" speed sign for northbound Malibu traffic
between Telemark Trail and Park Terrace.
3. There is a request to restrict parking on the cul -de -sac end of Lochmere Terrace
to enable the school bus to turn around especially in the winter, without having to
back all the way down the street to W. 78th Street.
TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW
October 5,.1999
Page 2
The school bus makes two stops there in the morning and two stops in the
afternoon.
The staff recommends no parking restrictions be posted on the east side of the
circle at the north end of Lochmere Terrace for the hours of 8 AM to 9 AM and 3
PM to 5 PM, Monday thru Friday.
SECTION B:
Requests on which the staff recommends denial of request.
1. Request for a "Yield" sign on Tralee Drive at the intersection of Lee Valley Road.
This is a 'T type intersection with no accident history.
The request was the result of a confrontation with an area resident and a
resident from Tralee Drive.
The staff recommends that the request be denied. A letter will be sent to all the
residents on Tralee Drive reminding them of their obligation by law to yield to any
traffic on Lee Valley Road. A copy of that letter is attached to this report.
2. A request for signing advising traffic eastbound on Indian Hills Pass of a hidden
driveway at 6404 Cherokee Trail. The driveway entrance is on Indian Hills Pass.
Indian Hills Pass has a downhill grade from the intersection with Indian Hills
Road to Gleason Road. The driveway entrance is approximately half way
between Indian Hills Road and Gleason Road. There is a daily,average
eastbound traffic of 633 vehicles with an 85 percentile speed of 35 MPH. There
are no sidewalks in this area. Since 1991 there was one property damage
accident in this area on 11/30/96. The requestors own a small piece of property
to the west of the driveway that is covered with brush and small trees to the edge
of the roadway that obstructs the view of the driveway and anyone using it.
The requestors were advised to clear away some of the brush and small trees to
improve the sight lines.
The staff recommends denial of a "Blind Driveway" warning sign per policy of not
installing them on any residential street with a speed limit of 30 MPH.
TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW
October 5, 1999
Page 3
SECTION C:
Requests which are deferred to a later date or referred to others.
1. Regarding the Parkwood Knolls traffic study, SRF Consulting Group and staff
have not completed part of the study and therefore, the report will not be ready
until the November 16th Council meeting.
2. There was a request for speed bumps on Mackey Avenue between Sunnyside
and W. 44th Street. The staff wants to continue discussion of this until the
Parkwood Knolls issue is discussed. Traffic calming measures will be discussed
at that time.
3. A request for a pedestrian crosswalk somewhere between or at Duncraig Road
and Lochloy Drive on Ayrshire Boulevard.
The proposed crosswalk would be in the area of the northwest corner of the
Highland School grounds. It would be used by 20 -25 children supposedly in
crossing from one side of Ayrshire Boulevard to the other side. There is a piece
of property where the children can then cut through to the school. The school
property does not come out to Ayrshire Boulevard. The only entrance to the
school is on the west side off of Doncaster Way.
There are no sidewalks in this area for the crosswalk to hook up with. The
children would still have to use the streets whether they are coming from Lochloy
Drive or Duncraig Road in order to use the proposed crosswalk.
The staff recommends continuing this request until the school and the site
committee can come up with a comprehensive safe walking program along with
written permission from property owners to use their property as a cut through
from Ayrshire Boulevard to the school grounds.
City of Edina
September 23, 1999
Dear Residents of Tralee Drive,
A few weeks ago there was a confrontation between two motorists at
the intersection of Tralee Drive and Lee Valley Road over who had right -of way
at the intersection.
The state law now requires that anyone on a street such as Tralee Drive
that ends or'Ts' with a street such as Lee Valley Road (and there are no
other controls present), must yield to the traffic from either direction of
the through street (Lee Valley Road).
The requirement to yield to those on your right still holds true for 4 7way
intersections when there are no controls in place.
Hopefully the above explanation will clear up any misunderstanding
regarding right -of -way at'T' type intersections. Please pass this on
to other drivers in your family and friends.
Sincerely,
Vince Bonga
Traffic Safety Coordinator
City of Edina
City Hall
4801 WEST 50TH STREET
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394
(612) 927 -8861
FAX (612) 826 -0390
TDD (612) 826 -0379
4)gZ�A.
e
0
lees
REPORURECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor Maetzold and members of
the Edina City Council.
From: John Keprios, Director
Park & Recreation Department
Date: October 12, 1999
Subject: Wooddale Park Comfort Station.
Agenda Item IV. C.
Consent
Information Only
Mgr. Recommends
❑ To HRA
z To Council
® Motion
❑ Resolution
❑ Ordinance
❑ Discussion
RECOMMENDATION:
The Park Board recommends:
"TO ACCEPT THE STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED COMFORT STATION AT
WOODDALE PARK."
INFO /BACKGROUND:
As directed by the City Council, staff assembled and worked with a 15 member neighborhood
committee to design -a permanent comfort station (restroom facility) for Wooddale Park.-The
proposed comfort station design includes:
• A unisex bathroom.
• A mechanical/utility room.
• Over -hang roof that accommodates three 8' picnic tables.
• Electronic keyless locking system.
Copies of the comfort station design and location drawings are included in this report.
The plan calls for the relocation of the existing Greg Rice Memorial picnic shelter, which was
donated by the Rice family. I have met with former Council Member and Park Board Chairman,
Mr. Jack Rice about moving the picnic shelter to Utley Park near the fire ring. Mr. Rice stated
,d
that the Rice family is in support of this request if it is in the best interest of the community. If
approved, the picnic shelter would be moved by our own Park Maintenance staff.
The members of the Wooddale Park Neighborhood Committee expressed their desire to have the-- -
permanent comfort station design to address the following concerns:
u
• Minimize the size of the permanent structure to keep it in appropriate aesthetic balance with
the size of the park.
• One permanent bathroom facility would be adequate (a single unisex portable toilet has
proven to meet the need in the past).
• Minimize the number of permanent structures to keep everything under one roof.
• Central location of existing picnic shelter is the ideal location for one permanent structure.
• Allow shelter for three 8' picnic tables.
• The structure's architectural design and materials should be similar to and compliment
Country Club area architecture.
The Park Board and staff believe that the Wooddale Park Neighborhood Committee has selected
the best option for Wooddale Park. The design is cost effective to construct, maintain and is both
aesthetically pleasing and functional. To locate the comfort station to its proposed central
location will require the sewer and water utilities to be moved a short distance to the southeast.
If approved by the City Council, the comfort station would be ready for bid in December with
construction completed by the end of July 2000.
Rough construction cost estimates for this project are:
Relocate utilities $1,000
Move Rice picnic shelter to Utley Park 2,000
Construct the comfort station 85,000
Architect/engineering fees 20,000
TOTAL $108,000
The architect/engineering fees appear to be rather high because the facility has been designed,
engineered, then redesigned several times. In addition, the architect,has attended committee
meetings and Park Board meetings as part of the process.
Funding for this project is proposed to come from the Developer's Fund. These are funds that
have been kept in reserve because the Park Referendum funds had to be spent within a 24 month -
time frame in order to utilize interest earnings from the principal. As pointed out in the
September Park Board minutes, the reserved funds came from payment of a loan to the Edina
Aquatic Center to purchase and install the water play structure for the wading pool. The current
balance of the Developer's Fund is $257,000.
Ed MacHolda, Assistant Director, and Jon Brakke, Architect, will be present in my absence if
there are any questions.
2
FA F- x I r4 cp
I t-\ CA- 1 h4 C e
WOOPDi1LE PARK.
IT G PLAN
Vifr rAM
U
L14A
r V 'Vtq ld:?
o I No L J
N;::d rin cn,-Yc -nrw.
m6ig -
0- 4w
a
Lr,;5AA
_;r4a^
7[
TE
lto ,
----------- Z'
7
T
r14
Lt .1
WOODDALE PARK DEVELOPMENT
CITIZENS COMMITTEE
Andrea Brandt 4611 Casco Ave. (24)
Becky Briggs 4512 Wooddale Ave. So. (24)
Kirt Briggs 4609 Casco Ave. (24)
Michael & Anne Hall 4405 Country Club Rd. (24)
Carol Kast &
StuartAdler 4610 Casco Ave. (24)
Alyce & David Lees 4626 Drexel Ave. South (24)
Jane & Charles Paulus 4617 Moorland Ave. (24)
Kathryn &
Keith Peterson 4303 Country Club Road (24)
Marcia Rehnberg 4602 Drexel Ave. (24)
Sandy Simmons 4619 Wooddale Ave. So. (24)
STAFF
John Keprios, Director
Edina Park and Recreation Department
4801 West 50th St.
Edina, MN 55424
wk. 826 -0430
STAFF
Ed MacHolda, Assistant Director
Edina Park and Recreation Department
4801 West 50th St.
Edina, MN 55424
wk. 826 -0431
ARCHITECT
Mr. Jon Brakke, AIA
Smiley Glotter Nyberg
1021 LaSalle Avenue
Minneapolis, MN 55403 -2082
wk. 612 - 332 -1401
r
Assn
1�
uJ ' ka
1
1
J� ➢
W O O D D A L, •&
o,
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Francis J. Hoffmar►i�-
City Engineer
Date: 19 October, 1999
Subject: Storm Sewer No. STS -261,
W. 48th St. From Maple Rd.
to E of Townes Rd.
Change Order
Recommendation:
Agenda Item #
Consent
Information Only
Mgr. Recommends
Action
IV.D.
❑ To HRA
® To Council
® Motion
❑ Resolution
❑ Ordinance
❑ Discussion
Approve change order for Design Excavating, Inc. for additional excavation and
concrete pavement.
Info /Background:
As part of Storm Sewer Project STS -261, the residents petitioned for curb and gutter
during the project. Council approved the extra work and as such, additional concrete
work was ordered. Quantities changed on some excavation work and driveway
pavement. Thus, different unit prices were negotiated'and placed in a change order.
The change order was the second on the job and the total exceeds the 10% limit
allowed by City policy for staff approval. The second change order exceeds the 10%
limit by $70.02. Staff recommends approval of the change order.
AGENDA ITEM: IV.E.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
Gordon Hughes, City Manager
FROM: Jerry Gilligan
DATE: October 14, 1999
RE: Proposed Refunding Bonds for Edina Park Plaza Project
The City has received a request from Brookdale Living Communities of
Minnesota, Inc. (` Brookdale Living Communities ") that the City issue tax - exempt revenue bonds
under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C, to refund the City's Housing Development Refunding
Revenue Bonds (FHA Insured Mortgage Loan -Edina Park Plaza Project), Series 1989 -A and
1989 -B (the "1989 Bonds "). The 1989 Bonds were issued to refinance prior bonds issued by the
City to finance the acquisition and construction of Edina Park Plaza, the senior housing project
located at 3330 Edinborough Way.
The bonds are proposed to be issued in the principal amount of up to $17,100,000,
and proceeds of the bonds will be used to refund the 1989 Bonds and pay issuance expenses.
The debt service on the bonds will be payable solely from payments to be made by
Brookdale Living Communities. It is expected that the refunding bonds will be secured by a
credit enhancement provided by the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation or the Federal
National Mortgage Association. The City will not have any liability with respect to the bonds.
Brookdale Living Communities will pay all City expenses with respect to the bonds, and upon
issuance of the bonds will pay the City a fee equal to %Z of I% of the principal amount of the
bonds in accordance with the City's guidelines for issuance of revenue bonds.
If the Council wishes to proceed with the issuance of the refunding bonds the first
step is to call for a public hearing on the proposed issuance of the refunding bonds. The public
hearing will be held on November 16'h and at that time the Council will be asked to approve the
issuance of the bonds. Representatives for Brookdale Living Communities will attend the
November 16'h public hearing to respond to any questions concerning the proposed refunding
bonds.
JPG:cmn
DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP
.,
City of Edina
RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON
THE ISSUANCE OF HOUSING DEVELOPMENT
REFUNDING REVENUE BONDS
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the
"City"), as follows:
SECTION 1
Recitals
1.1. The City has received a request from representatives of the owner of Edina Park
Plaza, an approximately 203 unit multifamily rental housing development located at 3330
Edinborough Way in the City (the "Development ") that the City issue revenue bonds (the
"Bonds ") pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C (the "Act "), the proceeds of which will
be used to (i) refund all or a portion of the outstanding Housing Development Refunding
Revenue Bonds (FHA Insured Mortgage Loan-Edina Park Plaza Project), Series 1989 -A and
1989 -B of the City, issued by the City to refund bonds issued to finance the construction and
improvement of the Development; and (ii) pay costs of issuance of the Bonds.
SECTION 2
Public Hearin
2.1. Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended and regulations
promulgated thereunder, requires that prior to the issuance of the Bonds, this Council approve the
issuance of the Bonds after conducting a public hearing thereon. A public hearing on the
proposal to issue the Bonds is hereby called and shall be held on November 16, 1999, at 7:00
o'clock p.m., at the City Hall.
2.2. The City Clerk shall cause notice of the public hearing to be published in a
newspaper circulating generally in the City, at least once not less than fifteen (15) days prior to
the date of the public hearing. The notice to be published shall be in substantially the following
form:
CITY OF EDINA
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON THE ISSUANCE OF
HOUSING DEVELOPMENT REFUNDING REVENUE BONDS
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Edina,
Minnesota (the City) will meet on November 16, 1999, at 7:00 p.m., at the City Hall, 4801 West
500' Street, in the City of Edina, Minnesota, to conduct a public hearing on the proposed issuance
City Hall -1- (612) 927 -8861
4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 826 -0390
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 826 -0379
by the City of refunding revenue bonds under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C (the "Act ") in-a.
principal amount not exceeding $17,100,000 (the "Bonds "), in order to refund all or a portion of
the outstanding Housing Development Refunding Revenue Bonds (FHA Insured Mortgage
Loan-Edina Park Plaza Project), Series 1989 -A and 1989 -B of the City (the "1989 Bonds "),
which were issued pursuant to the Act to refund bonds issued by the City to finance an rental
housing development designed for occupancy primarily by elderly persons containing
approximately 203 rental units and including functionally related and subordinate facilities. The
development is located at 3330 Edinborough Way in the City and is owned by Brookdale Living
Communities of Minnesota, Inc.
The Bonds will be limited obligations of the City, payable solely from revenues
specifically pledged to the payment of the Bonds and will not constitute a debt of the City. No
holder of the Bonds shall ever have the right to compel the exercise of the taxing power of the
City to pay the Bonds or the interest thereon, or to enforce payment thereon against any property
of the City.
All persons may appear and be heard at the time and place set forth above, or may
file written comments with the City Clerk prior to the date of the hearing set forth above.
Dated: October 19, 1999.
/s/ Debra Mangen
City Clerk
1999.
Attest
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina on this 19th day of October,
City Clerk
-2-
Mayor
"r%
10/18/99 MON 12:13 FAX 612 340 7800
John H. Mau. Jr.
V iee President - Projed Finance
Telephone: (312) 977 3786
Facsimile: (312) 977 -3701
A' -Mail: JMcr1v90rool(daleLivine,com
October 15, 1999
City Council
City of Edina
4801 W. 50`h Street
Edina, MN 55424
DORSEY & WHITNEY IM 002
AGENDA ITEM: IV.E.
93LIVING COMMUNITIES, INC.
..,.......,.__....... _._...... .................... .... .. ........
.__..,.._.
Re: Edina Park Plaza
;dear City Council:
This letter is being submitted to you in conjunction with a request that the City issue a refunding
bond issue for Edina Park Plaza at 3330 Fdinborough Way, Edina, MN 55435 in Edina.
The project is currently financed with the proceeds of a fixed rate Series 1989 refunding bond
issue that is rated "AAA" and has mortgage insurance from HUD/FHA. This new bond issue
will have a 30 year term and be rated "AAA" with credit enhancement from either FNMA or
Freddie Mac under their variable rate bond program. Proceeds of the bonds will be utilized to
refund the Series 1989 bond issue, pay the financing costs, and fund the required mortgage
reserves.
We purchased the property from Edina Park Plaza Associates Limited Partnership, an Illinois
limited partnership, the original developer and owner of the property, on May 7, 1997. Since
that time, we have initiated and completed a number of improvements to the property, having
invested approximately $1.5 million. At this tune, the property is 100% leased.
We agree to pay all expenses of the City in connection with the issuance of the bonds, and upon
issuance of the bonds will pay the City. a fee equal ! to th of -1 % of the principal amount of the
bonds as required by the City's policy.
We look forward to working with the City of
financing or the property can he directed to me.
Sincerely,
hn H. Mertz, Jr.
77 WEST WACKFIZ I)RJVI' $UITI?
in this endeavor
( 11W.M.3.0, II, 60601
TFI TPI TON 31219-77-3700 FAX 312/077.3701
1
Any questions on the
19
o� e
• 0 •
lass
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION
To:
MAYOR AND COUNCIL
Agenda Item
W.F.
From:
ERIC ANDERSON
Consent
❑
ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER
Information Only
Date:
OCTOBER 19, 1999
Mgr. Recommends
❑
To HRA
®
To Council
Subject:
LIQUOR STORES - OVERVIEW
❑
Motion
AND STRATEGIES
❑
Resolution
U
❑
Ordinance
®
Discussion
INFO/BACKGROUND:
As per your request at the budget hearings in July, staff will
make a presentation summarizing the operations of the liquor
stores and long -range strategies for increasing profit levels.
0
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Debra Mangen
City Clerk
Date: October 19,1999
Subject: Receive petition
REP ORT/RECOMMENDATION
Recommendation:
Refer the petition received to Engineering for processing as to feasibility.
Info/Background:
The City received a petition circulated by Scott & Joan Levin requesting sidewalk
installation on Hansen Road between .Veron and Benton Avenues. The City's normal
procedure is to refer the petition to the Engineering Department for processing as to
feasibility.
Agenda Item # V.A.
Consent
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends F1
To HRA
®
To Council.
Action
®
Motion
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
Discussion
Recommendation:
Refer the petition received to Engineering for processing as to feasibility.
Info/Background:
The City received a petition circulated by Scott & Joan Levin requesting sidewalk
installation on Hansen Road between .Veron and Benton Avenues. The City's normal
procedure is to refer the petition to the Engineering Department for processing as to
feasibility.
A.
o E f�Vd City ,k le Minnesota DATE:
n CITY COUNCIL C Uckg- q/ q c7
-� 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 53424
• (612) 927 -8861 • (612) 927 - 7645 -FAX • (612) 927 - 5461 -TDD
PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL "' SEAL "<
id aCT 1 3 1P99
SIDEWALK ❑ ALLEY PAVING D WAT R E
`MAM�p
El STORM SEWER El SANITARY SEWER ❑ STR ING
❑ CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ❑ PERMANENT STREET ❑ OTHER:
SURFACING WITH
CURB AND GUTTER
To the Mayor and City Council:
The persons.who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to
the locations listed below.;- .C11,,� "04 v bn Pamek 0.46 � �e
-+ he. P&
a fiv K �Qd. between and
LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS
between and
LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS
between and
iCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS
between and
LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS
IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT
THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE
PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE
COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES.
PROPERTY OWNER'S
rip
OWNER'S NAME
(PRINTED)
PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNER'S
PHONE
50v1 Ala -zg�y�
5' .7q /4,,js,, 61a - ts-X_ -IYYa';1 ..:
1 58f 2 JK0wSe." f d
8. Ja n Ad &h
petition was circulated by:
S$cx� S ) 2D, (o ( a - 9 -)CF - 3V 6
5S01 �alJSet� 141. 61 9ZS- -3893
.►rte
0ly -q$5 -53 q(0
NAME ADDRESS PHONE
r -^
There is space for more ' signatures on the back or you may attach extra pages. SEPTEMBER 19W
MLAAW, MIKE.
BM
112
4
OWNER'S NAME
PROPERTY ADDRESS
OWNER'S
S -lIP ESE
�oQ HRK)sc-m
C_ ✓ l F S IAA, �► V\
C4 v, S e -A-
z(.,
Q�JUi0 N�iAl
5713 IMIV5EIV RD
920 -57I�
aka, /.a rsOA)
5 56n ill
9 9 -7- 0 7 '�l
JA 5,, iJ Pa's N F tE
►576 6 X570 e)
e r -y ye_ e oq e--I /G o
,' ?%d &,4i —e -n "ey
--z 9 - 06--s-,o
(�t,1 � i�sc v.t
SN � r �-� �► s� � �� ,
6 S7 �1D -�f36 U
j
07211-125M g?,-4
R25 /�c1
T ze Y Ax ,o R4
�i ylt'l�J5f ,11?d
5a 2- 2 56®z.
COUNCIL
r
CHECK R.
STER
13 -OCT -1999 (1k
1 page 1
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
204252
10/19/99
$1,470.25
AAA
Spv,Title,6 1/2$ Exci
092999
EQUIPMENT OPER
LIC & PERMITS
10/19/99
$16.50
AAA
LICENSES & PERMITS
10/06/99
EQUIPMENT OPER
LIC & PERMITS
< *>
$1,486.75*
204253
10/19/99
$1,864.38
ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY
Furnish /install tommy
051652 -0
VEHICLE OPERAT
GENERAL SUPPLI
5118
10/19/99
$293.99
ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY
Bulkhead, stabilizer
051786 -0
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
5680
< *>
$2,158.37*
204254
10/19/99
$392.70
Accountemps
Temp help -data
01105334
FINANCE
PROF SERVICES
10/19/99
$392.70
Accountemps
Temp help data
01130806
FINANCE
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$785.40*
204255
10/19/99
$225.15
ACE SUPPLY
Alum. tee, galv saddl
243917
LIFT STATION M
REPAIR PARTS
5656
< *>
$225.15*
204256
10/19/99
$378.38
ACTION MAILING SERVICE
Mail processing
83097
GENERAL(BILLIN
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$378.38*
204257
10/19/99
$85.20
ADAMS PEST CONTROL
Critter control
10611009
GRILL
CONTR SERVICES
6085
< *>
$85.20*
204258
10/19/99
$658.32
Airtouch Cellular Bellev
Patrol cellular
1003 -254
PATROL
TELEPHONE
10/19/99
$230.57
Airtouch Cellular Bellev
Admin. /Invest. cellul
1003 -254
INVESTIGATION
TELEPHONE
10/19/99
$35.63
Airtouch Cellular Bellev
ACO Cellular
1003 -254
ANIMAL CONTROL
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$924.52*
204259
10/19/99
$28.67
Airtouch Cellular
Telephone
09/20/99
ED ADMINISTRAT
TELEPHONE
< *>
$28.67*
204260
10/19/99
$7.67
ALBINSON
Blueline Reproduction
824121
ENGINEERING GE
BLUE PRINTING
4446
10/19/99
$455.29
ALBINSON
Blueline Prints
825864
GENERAL(BILLIN
GENERAL SUPPLI
4455
10/19/99
$349.49
ALBINSON
Shop drawings
826994
GOLF ADMINISTR
PROF SERVICES
8395
10/19/99
$182.12
ALBINSON
Blueline reproduction
826995
GENERAL(BILLIN
GENERAL SUPPLI
4466
10/19/99
$8.86
ALBINSON
Paper,open end tube
827827
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
5857
10/19/99
$10.22
ALBINSON
Blueprint repro
829080
ADMINISTRATION
GENERAL SUPPLI
8395
< *>
$1,013.65*
204261
10/19/99
$28.65
ALL FIRE TEST INC
Service 7 fire exting
028703
ART CENTER ADM
SAFETY EQUIPME
10/19/99
$46.70
ALL FIRE TEST INC
Extingisher Service
028918
YORK OCCUPANCY
CONTR REPAIRS
10/19/99
$189.69
ALL FIRE TEST INC
Fire extinguisher the
028919
CLUB HOUSE
SAFETY EQUIPME
6082
< *>
$265.04*
,204262
10/19/99
$404.40
All Saints Brands
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
00015446
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
10/19/99
$482.00
All Saints Brands
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
00015625
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
10/19/99
$514.00
All Saints Brands
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
00015770
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
10/19/99
$184.00
All Saints Brands
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
00015799
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
< * >-
$1,584.40*
204263
10119199
$100.00
American Public Works As
Subscription (APWA)
110579
SUPERV. & OVRH
DUES & SUBSCRI
5758
< *>
$100.00*
204264
10/19/99
$24.99
American Youth Works
2 yr subscription
10/07/99
HUMAN RELATION
EDUCATION PRGM
< *>
$24.99 *.
204265
10/19/99
$36.83
Ameripride Linen & Appar
Laundry
M548414
VERNON OCCUPAN
LAUNDRY
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 13 -OCT -1999 (14149) page 2
CHECK NO DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
AMUNDSON, ERIK
Uniform /clothing allo
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
204265 10/19/99
$14.20
Ameripride
Linen
&
Appar
Laundry Sept.
16319 9-
LABORATORY
LAUNDRY
10/19/99
$145.76
Ameripride
Linen
&
Appar
Laundry
16813
GRILL
LAUNDRY
10/19/99
$60.07
Ameripride
Linen
&
Appar
Laundry -Sept.
35314 9-
VERNON OCCUPAN
LAUNDRY
10/19/99
$257.64
Ameripride
Linen.&
Arch Paging
Appar
Laundry -Sept.
35320 9-
YORK OCCUPANCY
LAUNDRY
10/19/99
$48.65
Ameripride
Linen
&
Appar
Laundry -Sept.
35334 9-
.50TH ST OCCUPA
LAUNDRY
10/19/99
$170.80
Ameripride
Linen
&
Appar
Laundry -Sept.
46 9 -30
CITY HALL GENE
LAUNDRY
10/19/99
$234.54
Ameripride
Linen
&
Appar
Laundry -Sept.
6200 9 -3
FIRE DEPT. GEN
LAUNDRY
< *>
$968.49*
< *>
$1,489.00*
PO NUM
9024
204266
10/19/99
$156.00
AMUNDSON, ERIK
Uniform /clothing allo
10/05/99
POLICE DEPT. G UNIF ALLOW
< *>
$156.00*
204267
10/19/99
$162.50
ANCOM
COMMUNICATIONS INC
Radio /phone line.:repa.6403
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONTR REPAIRS
<*>
$162.50*
204268
10/19/99
$9.35
Arch Paging
Paging service Sept.
108282
BUILDING MAINT
TELEPHONE
5797
< *>
$9.35*
204269
10/19/99
$1,194.95
ASPEN
EQUIPMENT CO..
Hoist certification
108190
EQUIPMENT OPER
CONTR REPAIRS
5727
10/19/99
$294.05
ASPEN
EQUIPMENT CO.
Spinnerlock,chain gua
434941
EQUIPMENT OPER
GENERAL
SUPPLI
5827
< *>
$1,489.00*
204271
10/19/99
$335.66
Aspen
Waste. Systems
RUBBISH REMOVAL
09/99
GENERAL MAINT
RUBBISH
REMOVA
10/19/99
$335.65
Aspen
Waste Systems
RUBBISH REMOVAL
09/99
PW BUILDING
RUBBISH
REMOVA
10/19/99
$89.23
Aspen
Waste Systems
RUBBISH REMOVAL
09/99
FIRE DEPT. GEN
RUBBISH
REMOVA
10/19/99
$20.44
Aspen
Waste Systems
RUBBISH REMOVAL
09/99
FIRE SUPPLIES
RUBBISH
REMOVAI
10/19/99
$406.64
Aspen
Waste Systems
RUBBISH REMOVAL
09/99
ARENA BLDG /GRO
RUBBISH
REMOVA
10/19/99
$262.63
Aspen
Waste Systems
RUBBISH REMOVAL
09/99
MAINT OF LOURS
RUBBISH
REMOVAI
-:
10/19/99
$229.92
Aspen
Waste Systems
RUBBISH REMOVAL
09/99
CLUB HOUSE
RUBBISH
REMOVA
10/19/99
$41.47
Aspen
Waste Systems
RUBBISH REMOVAL
09/99
ART CENTER BLD
RUBBISH
REMOVA
10/19/99
$230.34
Aspen
Waste Systems
RUBBISH REMOVAL
09/99
LITTER REMOVAL
RUBBISH
REMOVA
10/19/99
$690.05
Aspen
Waste Systems
RUBBISH REMOVAL
09/99
ED BUILDING &
RUBBISH
REMOVA
10/19/99
$63.08
Aspen
Waste Systems.
RUBBISH REMOVAL .
09/99
VERNON OCCUPAN
RUBBISH
REMOVA
10/19/99
$62.08
Aspen
Waste.-Systems
RUBBISH REMOVAL
09/99
YORK OCCUPANCY
RUBBISH
REMOVA
10/19/99
$22.19
Aspen
Waste Systems
RUBBISH REMOVAL
09/99
50TH ST OCCUPA
RUBBISH
REMOVA
10/19/99
$140.08
Aspen
Waste Systems
RUBBISH REMOVAL
09/99
LITTER REMOVAL
RUBBISH
REMOVA
10/19/99
$41.44
Aspen
Waste Systems
RUBBISH REMOVAL
09/99
FRED RICHARDS
RUBBISH
REMOVA
10/19/99
$137.22
Aspen
Waste Systems
RUBBISH REMOVAL
10/01/99
CITY HALL GENE
RUBBISH
REMOVA
< *>
$3,108.12*
204272
10/19/99
$32.35
AUGIE'S
INC.
Sandwiches
22420
FRED RICHARDS
COST OF
GD SO L
9025
10/19/99
$38.70
AUGIE'S
INC.
Sandwiches COGS
22629.
FRED RICHARDS
COST OF
GD SOL
9025
< *>
$71.05*
204273
10/19/99
$89.61
AUTOMATIC GARAGE DOOR
Repair south garage d
0138773
ARENA BLDG /GRO
CONTR REPAIRS
8054
< *>
$89.61*
204274
10/19/99
$12.00
BARR,
BRENDA
Class refund
10/06/99
ART CNTR PROG
REGISTRATION F
< *>
$12.00*
204275
10/19/99
$36.19
BATTERIES PLUS
Batteries- Streamlite
D133588
FIRE DEPT: GEN
GENERAL
SUPPLI
3564
< *>
$36.19*
204276
10/19/99
$192.71
Battery Wholesale Inc
Batteries
7589
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
5838'
10/19/99
i
$134.68
Battery Wholesale Inc
Batteries,credit (57.
7628
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
5849
• r
COUNCIL CHECK RL- STER
13 -OCT -1999 (14, ), page 3
CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<*> $327.39*
204277
10/19/99
Repair radio
10/19/99
POLICE DEPT. G
10/19/99
REPLACEM
4239
204278
10/19/99
911 System
1326624
204279
10/19/99
REPLACEM
4239
204280
10/19/99
< *>
1330906
204281
10/19/99
SERVICE
10/19/99
$968.54*
10/19/99
CM694796
POLICE DEPT. G
204282
10/19/99
Pens & Cleaner
6977140
204284
10/19/99
Repair Olympia
10/19/99
ARENA ICE MAIN
10/19/99
REPAIRS
10/19/99
$103.95*
10/19/99
PW BUILDING
10/19/99
5794
10/19/99
6987640
10/19/99
$22.00
10/19/99
Beer line cleaning
10/19/99
GRILL
10/19/99
SERVICES
10/19/99
$22.00*
10/19/99
GENERAL SUPPLI
10/19/99
GENERAL SUPPLIES
10/19/99
PARK ADMIN.
10/19/99
$90.00
10/19/99
Music program
10/19/99
ED ADMINISTRAT
10/19/99
Office supplies
$90.00*
204285
10/19/99
<*>
Appt. book,stapler
204286
10/19/99
GENERAL SUPPLI
10/19/99
Prntr labels
7009080
204287
10/19/99
10/19/99
7009080
10/19/99
$325.02
BEARCOM
Repair radio
1322351
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP
REPLACEM
4239
$449.22
BEARCOM
911 System
1326624
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP
REPLACEM
4239
$194.30
BEARCOM
Radio Serv. x 2
1330906
EQUIPMENT OPER
RADIO
SERVICE
5762
$968.54*
Office supplies
CM694796
POLICE DEPT. G
OFFICE SUPPLIE
3027
Pens & Cleaner
6977140
$103.95
Becker Arena Products
Repair Olympia
16951
ARENA ICE MAIN
CONTR
REPAIRS
8052
$103.95*
6985260
PW BUILDING
GENERAL SUPPLI
5794
Pens, pads, letter op
6987640
CENT SVC GENER
$22.00
Beer System Maintenance
Beer line cleaning
882
GRILL
CONTR
SERVICES
9026
$22.00*
PWKS ADMIN GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
GENERAL SUPPLIES
6987640
PARK ADMIN.
GENERAL SUPPLI
$90.00
BELL, BRUCE MENIER
Music program
10/03/99
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
Office supplies
$90.00*
FIRE DEPT. GEN
OFFICE SUPPLIE
3577
Appt. book,stapler
7009080
PARK ADMIN.
GENERAL SUPPLI
$392.60
$18.00
$205.54
$616.14*
$206.00
$206.00*
$528.40
$33.55
$69.63
$33.55
$114.13
- $204.86
$28.81
$59.64
$13.97
$92.77
$18.45
$41.67
$36.46
- $13.38
$146.27
$14.34
$30.42
$3.71
$34.71
$1,082.24*
BELLBOY CORPORATION
BELLBOY CORPORATION
BELLBOY CORPORATION
BERARD, KATHY CROSS
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
BERTELSON BROS.. INC.
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 17417600 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 17417700 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
Bags 30593400 50TH ST SELLIN PAPER SUPPLIES 9805
Reimburse golf rainou 10/07/99 GOLF PROG GREEN FEES EXE
Office supplies
6947960
POLICE DEPT. G
OFFICE SUPPLIE
3027
Indexes 6 pks
6952760
POLICE DEPT. G
OFFICE SUPPLIE
3027
Correction tape, scis
6953360
PW BUILDING
GENERAL SUPPLI
5770
3 pks indexes
UU695276
POLICE DEPT. G
OFFICE SUPPLIE
3027
Office supplies
6974520
FIRE.DEPT. GEN
OFFICE SUPPLIE
3563
Office supplies
CM694796
POLICE DEPT. G
OFFICE SUPPLIE
3027
Pens & Cleaner
6977140
LIQUOR YORK GE
OFFICE SUPPLIE
4365
Rubber Stamp
S004575
ENGINEERING GE
GENERAL SUPPLI
Pens, duster
6985260
PW BUILDING
GENERAL SUPPLI
5794
Pens, pads, letter op
6987640
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL SUPPLI
Diskette mailer
6987640
FINANCE
GENERAL SUPPLI
Printer labels
6987640
PWKS ADMIN GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
GENERAL SUPPLIES
6987640
PARK ADMIN.
GENERAL SUPPLI
Credit
CM695336
PW BUILDING
GENERAL SUPPLI
Office supplies
6999390
FIRE DEPT. GEN
OFFICE SUPPLIE
3577
Appt. book,stapler
7009080
PARK ADMIN.
GENERAL SUPPLI
Prntr labels
7009080
PWKS ADMIN GEN
GENERAL.SUPPLI
Pens
7009080
INSPECTIONS
GENERAL SUPPLI
Pens x 29
7009180
POLICE DEPT. G
OFFICE SUPPLIE
3043
$164.75 Best Access Systems of M Mort. Lock, core
$164.75*
$35.11
BEST
BUY COMPANY INC.
Diskettes x 120
$35.11
BEST
BUY COMPANY INC.
Diskettes
$70.22*
$66.76
Biffs
Inc
Sanitation
$66.76
Biffs
Inc
Sanitation
$57.47
Biffs
Inc
Sanitation
MN -10805 BUILDING MAINT REPAIR PARTS 5853
00504074 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI 3038
4328411 POLICE DEPT. G DATA PROCESSIN 3038
W76328 MAINT OF LOURS RUBBISH REMOVA 9027
W76329 MAINT OF LOURS RUBBISH REMOVA 9027
W76682 FRED RICHARDS RUBBISH REMOVA 9027
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
13 -OCT -1999 (14:49)
page 4
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
'DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------_------------------------------------------------
< *>
$190.99*
204290
10/19/99
$1,977.67
BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS
Blacktop
78898
STREET RENOVAT
BLACKTOP
10/19/99
$846.30
BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS
Blacktop
78912
GOLF DOME
CONTR REPAIRS
10/19/99
$1,000.80
BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS
Blacktop
78912
GENERAL MAINT
BLACKTOP
10/19/99
$181.83
BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS
Blacktop
78978
GOLF DOME
CONTR REPAIRS
10/19/99
$786.46
BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS
Blacktop
78978
DISTRIBUTION
BLACKTOP
10/19/99
$81.47
BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS
Blacktop
78978
GENERAL MAINT
BLACKTOP
10/19/99
$2,241.06
BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS
Blacktop
78982
STREET- RENOVAT.BLACKTOP
10/19/99
$89.86
- BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS
Blacktop
78991
GENERAL MAINT
BLACKTOP.
10/19/99
$1,469.21
BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS
Blacktop
78991
STREET RENOVAT
BLACKTOP
10/19/99
$260.99
BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS
Blacktop
78991
DISTRIBUTION
BLACKTOP
10/19/99
$785.04
BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS
Blacktop
79021
STREET RENOVAT
BLACKTOP
1704
10/19/99
$1,026.20
BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS
Blacktop
79026
STREET RENOVAT
BLACKTOP
10/19/99
$86.67
BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS
Blacktop
79032
GENERAL MAINT =:
BLACKTOP
10/19/99
$282.16
BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS
Blacktop
79050
GENERAL MAINT
BLACKTOP
10/19/99
$373.22
BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS
Blacktop
79050
DISTRIBUTION
BLACKTOP
10/19/99
$687.09
BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS
Blacktop
79050
PATHS & HARD S'BLACKTOP
10/19/99
$1,033.01
BITUMINOUS.ROADWAYS
Blacktop
79050
STREET RENOVAT
BLACKTOP
10/19/99
$255.30
BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS
Blacktop
79097
STREET RENOVAT
BLACKTOP
10/19/99
$878.93
BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS
Asphalt.'
79124
GENERAL STORM
BLACKTOP
1704
10/19/99
$93.45
BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS
Blacktop
79019
GENERAL MAINT..:
BLACKTOP
10/19/99
$1,309.35
BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS
Blacktop,
79019
STREET RENOVAT
BLACKTOP
10/19/99
$226.46
BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS
Blacktop,
79085
GENERAL MAINT
BLACKTOP
10/19/99
$2,766.32
BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS
Blacktop _
79085
DISTRIBUTION
BLACKTOP
10/19/99
$231.30
BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS
Blacktop
79085
GENERAL STORM
BLACKTOP
10/19/99
$3,236.76
BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
99 -6 (EN
TRACY AVE DROP
CIP
< *>
$22,206.91*
204291
10/19/99
$36.00
Blackwell, Ember
Class refund
10/06/99
ART CNTR PROG
REGISTRATION F
< *>
$36.00*
204292
10/19/99
$75.00
BLAIR, SUE
Art program on 11/26/
10/06/99
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$75.00*
204293
10/19/99
$100.00
BLOOD, DAVID
Police service,.Oct.,..10
/01/99
RESERVE PROGRA
CONTR SERVICES
< *>
$100.00 *.
- 204294
10/19/99
$75.00
BLOOMINGTON MEDALIST
BAN Music program 12/6/99.10/03/99
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$75.00*
204295
10/19/99
$138.00
Borg, Jenny
REGISTRATION FEES
10/02/99
ART CNTR PROG
REGISTRATION F
< *,>
$138.00*
204296
10/19/99
$58.05'
BRAUN INTERTEC
Concrete Testing_;...:.
092799
STRT RESURFACI
CIP
10/19/99
$58.05
BRAUN INTERTEC
:CONSTR. IN 'PROGRESS
092799
SKYLINE DRIVE
CIP
10/19/99
$58.05
BRAUN INTERTEC
CONSTR...IN:,PROGRESS
092799
ST MILL OVERLA
CIP
10/19/99
$58.05
BRAUN INTERTEC
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
092799
Rosemary La Re
CIP
10/19/99
$58.05
BRAUN INTERTEC
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
092799
Eden Prairie R
CIP
10/19/99
$101.40
BRAUN INTERTEC
Compaction Testing
093099
STRT RESURFACI
CIP
10/19/99
$101.40
BRAUN INTERTEC
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
093099 "
SKYLINE DRIVE
CIP
10/19/99
$101.40
BRAUN INTERTEC
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
093099
ST MILL OVERLA
CIP
10/19/99
$101.40
BRAUN INTERTEC
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
093099
Rosemary La Re
CIP
10/19/99
$101.40
BRAUN INTERTEC
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
093099
Eden Prairie R
CIP
< *>
$797.25*
i
COUNCIL
CHECK RL_ -3TER
13 -OCT -1999 (14.
,) page 5
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
204297
10/19/99
$428.56
BRISSMAN - KENNEDY INC
Cleaning Supplies
596304
CITY HALL GENE
CLEANING SUPPL
4461
10/19/99
$11.72
BRISSMAN - KENNEDY INC
Duster
596304 -1
CITY HALL GENE
CLEANING SUPPL
4461
< *>
$440.28*
204298
10/19/99
$172.32
BROWN TRAFFIC PRODUCTS
Visor,Spades,Ac Fan,F
130138
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
5779
< *>
$172.32*
204299
10/19/99
$35,092.44
Browning Ferris Industri
Recycling
7000078
RECYCLING
Recycling Char
< *>
$35,092.44*
204300
10/19/99
$4,728.69
Browning Ferris Industri
Refuse
1093657
50TH STREET RU
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$4,728.69*
204301
10/19/99
$163.08
BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC
Rock
283429
GENERAL MAINT
BLACKTOP
1762
< *>
$163.08*
204302
10/19/99
$100.00
BUTLER, GEORGE
Police services, Oct.
10/01/99
RESERVE PROGRA
CONTR SERVICES
< *>
$100.00*
204303
10/19/99
$457.03
C.S. McCrossan Construct
Blacktop
005339
GENERAL MAINT
BLACKTOP
10/19/99
$4,513.14
C.S. McCrossan Construct
Blacktop
005339
GOLF DOME
CONTR REPAIRS
< *>
$4,970.17*
204304
10/19/99
$40.00
CALHOUN ISLES COM BAND
Music program 11/7/99
10/03/99
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$40.00*
204305
10/19/99
$13.63
Call One Inc.
Car phones x 2
336882
POLICE DEPT. G
GENERAL SUPPLI
3037
< *>
$13.63*
204,306
10/19/99
$216.41
Camas
Cement
1110432
SIDEWALKS & PA
GENERAL SUPPLI
1766
10/19/99
$257.30
Camas
Concrete
1110433
PATHS & HARD S
SAND,GRVL & RO
1766
10/19/99
$165.02
Camas
Cement
1110817
GENERAL STORM
GENERAL SUPPLI
1766
10/19/99
$187.23
Camas
Concrete for bench
1110818
PATHS & HARD S
SAND,GRVL & RO
1766
10/19/99
$171.25
Camas
Concrete for bench
1110819
PATHS & HARD S
SAND,GRVL & RO
1766
10/19/99
$445.47
Camas
cement -6 1/2 yards
1111398
STREET RENOVAT
CONCRETE
1766
10/19/99
$445.47
Camas
Cement -6 1/2 yards
1111399
STREET RENOVAT
CONCRETE
1766
10/19/99
$445.47
Camas
Concrete
1112128
STREET RENOVAT
CONCRETE
1766
10/19/99
$522.38
Camas
Concrete
1112129
STREET RENOVAT
CONCRETE
1766
< *>
$2,856.00*
204307
10/19/99
$85.52
CANTON, JANET
SALARIES REGULAR,EMPL
10/11/99
PARK ADMIN.
SALARIES REG
< *>
$85.52*
204308
10/19/99
$26.63
Caribiner International
Microphone rental
MM 0331
CENT SVC GENER
PROF SERVICES
10/19/99
$26.63
Caribiner International
Microphone rental
MM70403
CENT SVC GENER
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$53.26*
204309
10/19/99
$3,950.00
Carlson La Vine Inc.
Repair loading dock
4263
VERNON OCCUPAN
CONTR REPAIRS
4442
< *>
$3,950.00*
204310
10/19/99
$100.00
CARLSON, CRAIG
Performance 11/9/99
10/04/99
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$100.00*
204311
10/19/99
$68.00
CASH REGISTER SALES
Service cash drawer
07/26/99
POOL OPERATION
CONTR REPAIRS
< *>
$68.00*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
$409.00
CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP,
Valve T 90
13 -OCT -1999 (14:
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION.
INVOICE.
PROGRAM
OBJECT
---------------------------------------=---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
204312
10/19/99
- $81.89
CATCO
Credit
3 -11382
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
10/19/99
$235.21
CATCO
Hydraulic Seal Kit, L
3 -11996
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
Pole, Hose, Adapter, -0102365
10/19/99
$94.66
CATCO
Hydraulics
3 -12065
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
Commercial Pool & Spa Su
10/19/99
$14.74
CATCO
Hydraulic Fitting
3- 12104;
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
< *>
Commercial Pool & Spa Su
$262.72*
.
POOL TRACK ORE
GENERAL SUPPLI
REFUND C
204313
10/19/99
$55.76
Chapman, Dawn
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OT
09/29/99
ARENA BLDG /GRO
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$55.76*
204314
10/19/99
$123.75
CHEMSEARCH
Maxi lube red acro
424131
EQUIPMENT OPER
GENERAL'SUPPLI
< *>
3536
$123.75*
$999.95*
204315
10/19/99
$250.00
CITY. OF ST. PAUL
Tragedy tactical revi
060728
POLICE DEPT. G
CONF & SCHOOLS
< *>
MEDIA LAB
$250.00 *.
9016
< *>
$191.78*
204316
10/19/99
$15.71
City Wide Window
Service Window cleaning
144159
.50TH ST OCCUPA
CONTR REPAIRS
CONNEY.SAFETY PRODUCTS
10/19/99
$25.56
City Wide Window
Service Window cleaning
144159
YORK OCCUPANCY
CONTR REPAIRS
$45.60.
10/19/99
$15.71
City Wide Window
Service Window cleaning
144159.
VERNON OCCUPAN
CONTR REPAIRS..
< *>
$74.99*
$56.98*
49) page 6
PO NUM
5830
5831
5831
5828
204317
10/19/99
$409.00
CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP,
Valve T 90
50114
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI 3520
10/19/99
$32.20
CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP
Cylinder hydrotest
22328
FIRE DEPT. GEN
EQUIP MAINT
< *>
$441.20*
204318
10/19/99
$179.05
Commercial Pool & Spa Su
Pole, Hose, Adapter, -0102365
-.
POOL TRACK ORE
GENERAL SUPPLI
2156
10/19/99
$104.50
Commercial Pool & Spa Su
Leaf rake, pole
"0102439-
POOL TRACK ORE
GENERAL SUPPLI
2158
10/19/99
- $69.76
Commercial Pool & Spa Su
Refund,-pole
0102613-
POOL TRACK ORE
GENERAL SUPPLI
REFUND C
10/19/99
$138.18
Commercial Pool & Spa Su
Chems,chlorine,muriat
0102650-
POOL,TRACK ORE
CHEMICALS
2163
< *>
$351.97*
204319
10/19/99
$999.95
COMPRESS AIR & EQUIPMENT
Parts /labor install 1
992730
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONTR REPAIRS
3536
< *>
$999.95*
204320
10/19/99
$191.78
COMPUSA.INC
4 color 4 blk ink car
40107567
MEDIA LAB
CRAFT SUPPLIES
9016
< *>
$191.78*
204321
10/19/99
$29.39
CONNEY.SAFETY PRODUCTS
PVC Coated.Gloves
01027008
GENERAL MAINT
SAFETY EQUIPME
5780
10/19/99
$45.60.
CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS
Gloves, tums
01035613
GENERAL MAINT
SAFETY EQUIPME
5859
< *>
$74.99*
204322
10/19/99
$169.97
CONSOLIDATED CONTAINER C.Recon.
Th. Poly.
008695
BUILDING MAINT
SAFETY EQUIPME
5591
< *>
$169.97*
204323
10/19/99
$150.80
Construction Bulletin Ma
Ads for bid
CB72986
ADMINISTRATION
ADVERTISING LE
< *>
$150.80*
-.
204324
.10/19/99
$168.00
CONTINENTAL CLAY CO
COGS
037447
ART SUPPLY GIF
COST OF GD SOL,9013
i
< *>
$168.00*
204325
10/19/99
$63.90
COPY CHECK
Toner cartridge
10936
FRED RICHARDS
OFFICE SUPPLIE
6080
< *>
$63.90*
204326
10/19/99
$26.76
Corporate Express Deli_ve
Courier
120406
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL SUPPLI
4476
< *>
$26.70*
COUNCIL
CHECK k- ..ASTER
13 -OCT -1999 (la._j)
page 7
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
----------------------------------------=-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
204327
10/19/99
$174.54
Coverall of The Twin Cit
Cleaning sept.
00000442
ART CENTER BLD
PROF SERVICES
10/19/99
$314.18
Coverall of The Twin Cit
Cleaning Oct.
44451
ART CENTER BLD
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$488.72*
204328
10/19/99
$143.15
Crown Trophy
bronze cast plaques
08/12/99
PARK MEMORIALS
GENERAL SUPPLI
7037
< *>
$143.15*
204329
10/19/99
$176.89
Curtis 1000
Office supply- envelop
27708201
ARENA ADMINIST
OFFICE SUPPLIE
8051
< *>
$176.89*
204330
10/19/99
$105.00
CUSTOM CAMERA
Repair camera
204811
MEDIA LAB
CONTR REPAIRS
3951
< *>
$105.00*
204331
10/19/99
$146.65
CY'S UNIFORMS
Badges
36303
FIRE DEPT. GEN
UNIF ALLOW
3523
10/19/99
$70.40
CY'S UNIFORMS
Uniform- Schmoll
36449
FIRE DEPT. GEN
UNIF ALLOW
3541
10/19/99
$80.95
CY'S UNIFORMS
Uniform - Schmoll
36455
FIRE DEPT. GEN
UNIF ALLOW
3541
10/19/99
$82.43
CY'S UNIFORMS
Badges- kregness
36314
FIRE DEPT. GEN
UNIF ALLOW
3502
< *>
$380.43*
204332
10/19/99
$184.57
DANKO EMERGENCY EQUIPMEN
Helmet
308019
FIRE DEPT. GEN
PROTECT CLOTHI
3519
< *>
$184.57*
204333
10/19/99
$1,700.00
DAVE PERKINS CONTRACTING
relocate hydrant
21056
DISTRIBUTION
CONTR REPAIRS
5636
< *>
$1,700.00*
204334
10/19/99
$177.31
DAVE'S DAIRY DELIVERY
Dairy
STMT
GRILL
COST OF GD SOL
9028
< *>
$177.31*
204335
10/19/99
$370.00
Davis Instruments
Equip. replace (weath
406845
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP REPLACEM
3032
< *>
$370:00*
204336
10/19/99
$1,609.22
DAY DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
72588
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
10/19/99
$81.15
DAY DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
72705
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
10/19/99
$4,018.05
DAY DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
72706
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
10/19/99
$1,570.55
DAY DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
72710
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
10/19/99
$85.00
DAY DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
72711
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
10/19/99
$694.40
DAY DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
72790
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
10/19/99
$1,126.35
DAY. DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
73213
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
10/19/99
$1,753.90
DAY DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
73328
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
10/19/99
$1,209.00
DAY DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
73331
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
10/19/99
$93.25
DAY DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
53353
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
< *>
$12,240.87*
204337
10/19/99
$5,000.00
Decision Resources LTD
Community survey
93099.2
ADMINISTRATION
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$5,000.00*
204338
10/19/99
$97.50
Deep Tine Inc
Taxes
38A
RICHARDS MAINT
PROF SERVICES
6042
10/19/99
$97.50
Deep Tine Inc
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
38A
MAINT OF LOURS
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$195.00*
204339
10/19/99
$42.69
DENNYS 5th AV BAKERY
Bakery COGS
23470
GRILL
COST OF GD SOL
9029
10/19/99
$19.59
DENNYS 5th AV BAKERY
Bakery COGS
23423
GRILL
COST OF GD SOL
9029
10/19/99
$28.59
DENNYS 5th AV BAKERY
Bakery COGS
23494
GRILL
COST OF GD SOL.9029
10/19/99
$20.97
DENNYS 5th AV BAKERY
Bakery
23525
GRILL
COST OF GD SOL
9029
10/19/99
$73.65
DENNYS 5th AV BAKERY
Bakery
23539
GRILL
COST OF GD SOL
9029
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER
13-OCT-1999 (14:49) page 8
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT------
VENDOR---------
- - - --
- - -- DESCRIPTION - - - - --
INVOICE
---------
PROGRAM--- - -
- - - - --
- - -- OBJECT-- - - -
-PO -NUM
---------------------
204339
10/19/99
-- - - - - --
$25.92
- - - - --
DENNYS 5th AV BAKERY
- -
Bakery, COGS
23540
GRILL
COST
OF
GD SOL
9029
10/19/99
$14.82
DENNYS 5th AV BAKERY
Bakery, COGS
23806
GRILL
COST
OF.GD
SOL
9029
10/19/99
$22.89
DENNYS 5th AV BAKERY
Bakery COGS
23813
GRILL
COST
OF
GD SOL
9029
10/19/99
$29.25
DENNYS 5th AV BAKERY
Bakery -COGS
23856
GRILL
COST
OF
GD SOL
9029
10/19/99
$74.76
DENNYS 5th AV BAKERY
Bakery -COGS
24085
GRILL
COST
OF
GD SOL
10/19/99
$30.33
DENNYS 5th AV BAKERY
Bakery-COGS
24082
GRILL
COST
OF
GD SOL
9029
< *>
$383.46*
204340
10/19/99
$20.00
Department of Public Saf
Buyer card year 2000
6504 155
LIQUOR 50TH ST
DUES
&
SUBSCRI
10/19/99
$20.00
Department of Public Saf
Buyer card year 2000
6504 155
LIQUOR YORK GE
DUES
&
SUBSCRI
10/19/99
$20.00
Department of Public Saf
Buyer card year 2000
6504 155
VERNON LIQUOR
DUES
&
SUBSCRI
< *>
$60.00*
204341
10/19/99
$660.00
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAF
2d qtr connect /op cha
P07 -MN02
POLICE DEPT, G
TELETYPE
SERVI
< *>
$660.00*
204342
10/19/99
$65.00
DHS -State of Minnesota
Continuing ed
10%05/99
POLICE DEPT. G
CONF
&
SCHOOLS
< *>
$65.00*-
204343
10/19/99
$220.84
DIAMOND ART & CRAFT DIST
COGS
185379
ART SUPPLY GIF
COST
OF
GD SOL
9026
< *>
$220.84*
204344
10/19/99
$33.53
Direct Safety. Company
Safety glasses x 4
14565720
BUILDING MAINT
SAFETY
EQUIPME
5782
< *>
$33.53*
204345
10/19/99
$155.00
DON BETZEN GOLF CO
COGS
10176
PRO SHOP
COST
OF
GDS -PR
6340
< *>
$155.00*
-
204346
10/19/99
$182.75
DONAGHUE DOORS
Door repair
11910
VERNON OCCUPAN
CONTR REPAIRS
< *>
$182.75*
204347
10/19/99
$1,848.69
DPC INDUSTRIES
Chlorine, hydrofluoro
01335545
WATER TREATMEN
WATER
TRTMT SU
1703
10/19/99
$4,196.34
DPC INDUSTRIES
Hydro acid, liquid ch
01336564
WATER TREATMEN
WATER
TRTMT SU
1703
< *>
$6,045.03*
204348
10/19/99
$103.93
E -Z -GO TEXTRON
Repair Parts E -Z -G6
0359874
CENTENNIAL LAK
REPAIR
PARTS
6133
10/19/99
$184.13
E -Z -GO TEXTRON
Repair parts
0369559
GOLF CARS
REPAIR
PARTS
6130
< *>
$288.06*
204350
10/19/99
$1,629.74
EAGLE WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI.
112229
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD WINE
10/19/99
$824.66
EAGLE WINE
COST OF GOODS SOW WI
112232
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD WINE
10/19/99
$136.95
EAGLE WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
112236
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD WINE
10/19/99
$1,841.25
EAGLE WINE
COST-.OF GOODS SOLD WI
11223 8
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD WINE
10/19/99
$170.10
EAGLE WINE
COST,:OF GOODS SOLD WI
112240
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD WINE
10/19/99
$363.04
EAGLE WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
112241
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD WINE
10/19/99
$78.00
EAGLE WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
113782
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD WINE
10/19/99
$360.00
EAGLE WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
115362
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD WINE
10/19/99
$1,800.60
EAGLE WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
115653
VERNON SELLING.
CST
OF
GD WINE
10/19/99
$420.40
EAGLE WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
115658
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD WINE
10/19/99
$654.75
EAGLE WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
115661
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD WINE
10/19/99
$273.90
EAGLE WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
115662
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD WINE
10/19/99
$2,320.27
EAGLE WINE
COST OF GOODS. SOLD „WI
115664
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD WINE
10/19/99
$721.10 ._
EAGLE WINE
COST OF GOODS .SOLD WI
117242
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD WINE
< *>
$11,594.76*
-COUNCIL
CHECK R�
-STER
i
13 -OCT -1999 (14
.) page 9
-CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
204351
10/19/99
$26.63
EARL F. ANDERSON
Viiiyl graphics
20147
PATHS & HARD S
GENERAL SUPPLI
5594
< *>
$26.63*
204352
10/19/99
$251.00
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
527417
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
10/19/99
$2,157.60
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
529285
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
10/19/99
$3,122.85
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST OF GOODS SOLD. BE
529286
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
10/19/99
$45.25
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
529847
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
10/19/99
$5,706.60
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE,529848
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
10/19/99
$1,651.70
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
532280
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
10/19/99
$57.40
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
532281
'VERNON•`SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
10/19/99
$1,182.30
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST. OF GOODS SOLD BE
532283
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
10/19/99
$1,926.75
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST.,OF GOODS SOLD BE
532844
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
< *>
$16,101.45*
204353
10/19/99
$3,791.00
Ebert Construction
Construction Golf Cou
FIVE
RESTROOM FACIL
CIP
CONTRACT
< *>
$3,791.00*
204354
10/19/99
$121.09
ECOLAB PEST ELIMINATION
Pest control
6332124
CENTENNIAL LAK
SVC CONTR EQUI
10/19/99
$102.67
ECOLAB PEST ELIMINATION
Spray for rats, mice,
6332130
POOL TRACK GRE
SVC.CONTR EQUI
CONTRACT
< *>
$223.76*
204355
10/19/99
$40.00
EDEN PRAIRIE COMMUNITY B
Music program 11/14/9
10/03/99
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$40.00*
204356
10/19/99
$230,526.00
EDINA FIREMEN'S RELIEF A
Pass thru 1999 state
10/07/99
GENERAL FD PRO
POLICE AID 1%
< *>
$230,526.00*
204357
10/19/99
$560.00
Eklund Tree Recycling
Wood waste disposal
10/01/99
TREES & MAINTE
RUBBISH REMOVA
54585476
< *>
$560.00*
204358
10/19/99
$36.60
Elder -Jones Bldg Permit
Job cancelled
99004737
GENERAL FD PRO
GARAGE INSP
99004737
< *>
$36.60*
204359
10/19/99
$200.00
Etcetera
Music program 11/26/9
10/03/99
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$200.00*
204360
10/19/99
$171.88
EULL'S MANUFACTURING CO
Catch basin, pallets
19482
GENERAL ST ORM
GENERAL SUPPLI
5570
< *>
$171.88*
204361
10/19/99
$2,336.00
Expert T Billing
Amb. bill Sept.
100799
FIRE DEPT. GEN
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$2,336.00*
204362
10/19/99_
$2,226.33
FADDEN PUMP COMPANY
Check valve
73150
LIFT STATION M
REPAIR PARTS
5658
<*>
$2,226.33*
204363
10/19/99
$24,500.00
Falls Automotive Inc
P/U Truck
4294
EQUIPMENT REPL
EQUIP REPLACEM
5745
< *>
$24,500.00*
204364
10/19/99
$31.95
FastFrame
Frame 19x22
1775628
ART CENTER ADM
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$31.95*
204365
10/19/99
$45.00
FINE, AGNES
Art program on 11/14/
10/06/99
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$45.00*
204366
10/19/99
$1,243.80
FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL COMPA
Sewer rods x 128
5342
SEWER CLEANING
REPAIR PARTS
5115
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
13 -OCT -1999 (14:
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
--- ----------------------------------------------------------------
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
------------------------------------------------------
< *>
$1,243.80*
204367
10/19/99
$150.00
Football Coaches Yearboo
Ad /12th page
5084
SKATING RINK M
ADVERT OTHER
< *>
$150.00*
204368
10/19/99
$290.87
Fowler Electric
Repair Parts
5468000
MAINT OF LOURS
REPAIR PARTS
< *>
$290.87*
204369
10/19/99
$100.00
Fragale, Annette
Performance on 11/26/
10/04/99
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$100.00*
204370
10/19/99
$29.17
G & K DIRECT PURCHASE
Jeans
3006813
PUMP & LIFT ST
LAUNDRY
10/19/99
$326.48
G & K DIRECT PURCHASE
Tshirts,sweatshirt,ja
3008898
PUMP & LIFT ST
LAUNDRY
< *>
$355.65*
204371
10/19/99
$79.54
G & K SERVICES
Clothing, (Shirts)
3010099
GENERAL MAINT
LAUNDRY
10/19/99
$39.91
G & K SERVICES
Uniforms /laundry
148254
ARENA BLDG /GRO
LAUNDRY
10/19/99
$41.56
G & K SERVICES
Uniforms /laundry
148254
CITY HALL GENE
LAUNDRY
10/19/99
$45.60
G & K SERVICES
Uniforms /laundry
148254
STREET REVOLVI
GENERAL SUPPLI
10/19/99
$175.62
G & K SERVICES
Uniforms /laundry
148254
PW.BUILDING
CLEANING SUPPI
10/19/99
$102.04
G & K SERVICES
Uniforms /laundry
148254
PUMP & LIFT ST
LAUNDRY
10/19/99
$265.24
G & K SERVICES
Uniforms /laundry
148254.
EQUIPMENT OPER
LAUNDRY
10/19/99
$650.80
G & K SERVICES
Uniforms /laundry
148254
GENERAL MAINT
LAUNDRY
10/19/99
$219.68
G & K SERVICES
Uniforms /laundry
148254
BUILDING MAINT
LAUNDRY
< *>
$1,619.99*
204372
10/19/99
$328.00
GADEN, MELANIE
Prof. services
10/11/99
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$328.00*
204373
10/19/99
$100.00
Gates, Kathy
Performance 11/26/99
10/04/99
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$100.00*
204374
10/19/99
$351.71
GE Capital ITS
Equip. replace - (cd -ro
90555261
POLICE DEPT, G
EQUIP REPLACED
10/19/99
$62.20
GE Capital ITS
2 Computer cable
90562312
GOLF ADMINISTR
OFFICE SUPPLII
10/19/99
$370.62
GE Capital. ITS
Data process. mau
90564544
POLICE.DEPT. G
DATA PROCESSI1
< *>
$784.53*
204375
10/19/99
$140.63
Georgantones;- Despie
Skate instr.
09/30/99
POOL TRACK GRE
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$140.63*
204376
10/19/99
$46.54
GIBBS, PEGGY
Anita's farewell.
10/04/99
FINANCE
GENERAL SUPPL?
< *>
$46.54*
204377
10/19/99
$42.07
GOPHER CASH REGISTER
.Cash -Reg Tape
20693
ARENA ADMINIST
OFFICE SUPPLII
< *>
$42:07*
204378
10/19/99
$200.00
Gose, Cathy
Refund of rental:dep6
09 /09/99
EDINB /CL PROG
RENTAL•INCOME
< *>
$200.00*
204379
10/19/99
$65.00
Government Finance Offic
BOOKS & PAMPHLETS
10/07/99
FINANCE
BOOKS & PAMPHI
< *>
$65.00*
204380
10/19/99
$83.64
GRAINGER
Pliers, paint, auto c
498 -3375
LIFT STATION M
TOOLS
10/19/99
$62.11
GRAINGER
Gloves x 48 pr.
498 -0739
GENERAL MAINT
SAFETY EQUIPMI
< *>
$145.75*
!9) page 10
PO NUM
16140
3026
4458
3033
8047
5773
5863
COUNCIL
CHECK R"__STER
13 -OCT -1999 (14:. , page 11
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT PO NUM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.----------------------------------------
204381
10/19/99
$306.00
GRAPE
BEGINNINGS
INC
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI
26783
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
10/19/99
$304.00
GRAPE
BEGINNINGS
INC
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI
26784
YORK
SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
10/19/99
$311.00
GRAPE
BEGINNINGS
INC
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI
26983
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
10/19/99
$609.00
GRAPE
BEGINNINGS
INC
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI
26984
YORK
SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
< *>
$1,530.00*
204382
10/19/99
$570.63
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC
CO.
GE lamp lights
104 -5729
POOL
TRACK GRE
GENERAL SUPPLI 2160
10/19/99
$172.79
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC
CO.
GE lamps, bulbs
104 -5783
POOL
TRACK GRE
GENERAL SUPPLI 2164
< *>
$743.42*
204383
10/19/99
$45.00
GREEN,
DICK
Art program 12/30/99
10/06/99
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$45.00*
204385 10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
204386 10/19/99
204387 10/19/99
204388 10/19/99
204389 10/19/99
204390 10/19/99
204391 10/19/99
G * >
204392 10/19/99
- $48.55
- $34.80
- $51.05
- $177.84
- $135.55
$1,599.92
$1,037.57
$92.50
$1,918.38
$6,442.95
$287.40
$1,879.62
$69.05
$1,081.20
$1,750.27
$26.04
$26.25
$88.44
$155.00
$826.15
$16,832.95*
GRIGGS.COOPER.& CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
$100.0'0 HALE, WILL
$100.00*
$35.00 HALL, MARILYN
$35.00*
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 118461
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 119340
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 119341
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 119527
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 119528
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 112231
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 112234
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 112237
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 112242
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 113048
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 115654
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 115655
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 115660
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 115663
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 115665
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 115666
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 115668
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 116447
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 117241
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 117244
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
LIQUOR YORK GE CST OF GD LIQU
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX
YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
Music program 11/4/99 10/03/99 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER
Art program 11/11/99 10/05/99 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER
$125.69 HALLMAN OIL COMPANY Gear oil
$125.69*
$80.00 HAPPY FACES
$60.00*
24905 EQUIPMENT OPER LUBRICANTS
Face painting 11/26/9 10/06/99 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER
$14,582.20 Hartland Fuel Products L Gas, diesel /unleaded 316622 EQUIPMENT OPER GASOLINE
$14,582.20*
$37.50 Hartley, Kimber
$37.50*
$103.00 Harvey, Sherry
$103.00*
Skating instr
Class refund
10/05/99 POOL TRACK GRE PROF SERVICES
09/21/99 ART CNTR PROG REGISTRATION F
5986
1217
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
13 -OCT -1999 (14:49) page 12
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
204393
10/19/99
$965.56
Hawkins Chemicals
Chemicals
205055
POOL OPERATION
CHEMICALS
10/19/99
$74.55
Hawkins Chemicals
Chemicals
208965
POOL OPERATION
CHEMICALS
10/19/99
- $965.56
Hawkins Chemicals
Chemicals
205055CM
POOL OPERATION
CHEMICALS
< *>
$74.55*
204394
10/19/99
$171.35
HEIMARK FOODS
Meat COGS
013873
GRILL
COST OF GD SOL
9032
< *>
$171.35*
204395
10/19/99
$53.00
HELMUTH, PATTY
Skating Class Refund
092999
ARENA BLDG /GRO
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$53.00*
204396
10/19/99
$129.82
HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF
Equip. Maint. - strips
ST 59192
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP MAINT
< *>
$129.82*
204397
10/19/99
$1,824.06
Hennepin County Sheriff'
Booking fee (Aug)
1- 121 -21
LEGAL SERVICES
COURT CHARGES
< *>
$1,824.06*
204398
10/19/99
$2,944.08
HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURE
Room /board Aug.
002382
LEGAL SERVICES
BRD & RM PRISO
< *>
$2,944.08*
204399
10/19/99
$1,038.12
HILTI.INC
Chiseing hammer, brea
5853414
DISTRIBUTION
TOOLS
5713
< *>
$1,038.12*
204400
10/19/99
$415.35
HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MANUF
White paint for athle
49736
FIELD MAINTENA
LINE MARK POWD
2119
< *>
$415.35*
204401
10/19/99
$1,386.67
Ho, Jeffery D
Medical director sery
10/01/99
FIRE DEPT. GEN
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$1,386.67*
204402
10/19/99
$182.81
Hoel, Judy
Skate pro ses I
09/30/99
POOL TRACK GRE
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$182.81*
204403
10/19/99
$210.00
HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP
20/20 Vision
10/07/99
ADMINISTRATION
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$210.00*
204404
10/19/99
$71.95
Home Juice
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
45264
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
< *>
$71.95*
204405
10/19/99
$5,730.00
Honeywell Inc
Adjust per Attached L
213H]3114
ARENA ADMINIST
PROF SERVICES
10/19/99
$2,809.00
Honeywell Inc
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQU
213HB114
GOLF DOME
SVC CONTR EQUI
10/19/99
$2,696.50
Honeywell Inc
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQU
213HB114
ED BUILDING &
SVC CONTR EQUI
< *>
$11,235.50*
204406
10/19/99
$80.95
HOOTENS
Laundry (blankets)
08/17/99
POLICE DEPT. G
LAUNDRY
< *>
$80.95*
204407
10/19/99
$26.50
Hoover, Nancy
Reimburse Edinboro pu
10/08/99
EDINB /CL PROG
GEN ADMISSIONS
< *>
$26.50*
204408
10/19/99
$755.50
HOPKINS PET - HOSPITAL
Kennel services
0118785
ANIMAL CONTROL
LEASE LINES
< *>
$755.50*
204409
10/19/99
$332.00
HOPKINS SCHOOL DISTRICT
Win 95 trng. -bldg.
1597
CENT SVC GENER
CONF & SCHOOLS
10/19/99
$300.00
HOPKINS SCHOOL DISTRICT
File mgmt trn-bldg
1607
CENT SVC GENER
DATA PROCESSIN
< *>
$632.00*
13 -OCT -1999 (14:
page 13
COUNCIL
CHECK RL _STER
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION - - --
-- - - --
INVOICE
---------------
PROGRAMOBJECTPO
--------------------------------
-NUM
-
--------------------------------------------=---------------------------
204410
10/19/99
$187.50
Houston, Chris
Skate instr. ses I
09/30/99
POOL TRACK GRE
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$187.50*
204411
10/19/99
$9.03
HUEBSCH
Towels x 10
876502
POOL TRACK GRE
SVC CONTR EQUI
CONTRACT
10/19/99
$59.10
HUEBSCH
Towels, linens
881087
POOL TRACK GRE
LAUNDRY
CONTRACT
< *>
$68.13* .
204412
10/19/99
$125.76
HYDRAULIC COMPONENT SERV
Sander motors,recond.
14161
EQUIPMENT OPER
GENERAL SUPPLI
5839
< *>
$125.76*
204413
10/19/99
$1,496.70
HYDRO SUPPLY CO
BP- RTR -M35CF trace rt
0015355-
UTILITY PROG
INVENTORY WATE
3671
< *>
$1,496.70*
204414
10/19/99
$193.67
Ikon Office Solutions
Copier usage
23455775
ART CENTER ADM
EQUIP RENTAL
< *>
$193.67*
204415
10/19/99
$178.36
INDEPENDENT BLACK DIRT C
Clay for Braemar
2215
FIELD MAINTENA
INFIELD MIX
5585
< *>
$178.36*
204416
10/19/99
$300.00
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST
Advertising
1052A
ART CENTER ADM
ADVERT OTHER
6467
< *>
$300.00*
204417
10/19/99
$344.66
INLAND TRUCK PARTS
Driveline Part, End Y
4 -96274
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
< *>
$344.66*
204418
10/19/99
$104.75
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE
Code book -kiehn
0- 998946
INSPECTIONS
BOOKS & PAMPHL
< *>
$104.75*
204419
10/19/99
- $134.19
INTERSTATE DETROIT DIESE.Water
Pump Core Chg
00198338
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
10/19/99
$74.00
INTERSTATE DETROIT DIESE
Diagnostic Kohler Gen
0197654
EQUIPMENT OPER
CONTR REPAIRS
5386
10/19/99
$33.24
INTERSTATE DETROIT DIESE
Seal -Tube, Plug
00104113
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
5734
10/19/99
$251.94
INTERSTATE DETROIT DIESE
Kit,filter
00105599
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
5840
< *>
$224.99*
204420
10/19/99
$79.22
IOS Capital
Copier, Oct. /Nov.
45117439
ART CENTER ADM
EQUIP RENTAL
< *>
$79.22*
204421
10/19/99
$55.49
J.H. LARSON COMPANY
600V Dual elem. indic
4140433-
PUMP & LIFT ST
GENERAL SUPPLI
5862
10/19/99
$274.59
J.H. LARSON COMPANY
Screw,wire
4140962-
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
5872
< *>
$330.08*
204422
10/19/99
$100.00
JAMES, WILLIAM F
Police service, Oct.
10/01/99
RESERVE PROGRA
CONTR SERVICES
< *>
$100.00*
204423
10/19/99
$123.29
JERRY'S FOODS
Sept. Food
092299
GENERAL FD PRO
MISCELLANOUS
10/19/99
$29.88
JERRY'S FOODS
Sept. Food
092299
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
10/19./99
$7.52
JERRY'S FOODS
Sept. Food
092299
PLAYGROUND & T
GENERAL SUPPLI
10/19/99
$3.34.
JERRY'S FOODS
Sept. Food
092299
GRILL
COST OF GD SOL
10/19/99
$123.84
JERRY'S FOODS
Sept. Food
092299
ART CENTER ADM
GENERAL SUPPLI
10/19/99
$109.46
JERRY'S FOODS
Council mtg
92899
CITY COUNCIL
MEETING EXPENS
4475
10/19/99
$29.55
JERRY'S FOODS
Lunch work session
100599
ADMINISTRATION
MEETING EXPENS
< *>
$426.88*
204425
10/19/99
$45.95
JERRY'S HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
252162/S
ELECTION
GENERAL SUPPLI
10/19/99
$64.13
JERRY'S HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
252162/S
GENERAL MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 13 -OCT -1999 (14:49) page 14
CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE -PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
204425 10/19/99
$29.78
JERRY'S
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
252162/S
ST LIGHTING OR
GENERAL
SUPPLI
10/19/99
$99.55
JERRY'S
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
252162/S
STREET NAME SI
GENERAL
SUPPLI
10/19/99
$22.73
JERRY'S
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
252162/S
STREET REVOLVI
GENERAL
SUPPLI
10/19/99
$67.70
JERRY'S
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
252162/S
POLICE DEPT. G
GENERAL
SUPPLI
10/19/99
$54.09
JERRY'S
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
252162/S
'YORK FIRE STAT
GENERAL
SUPPLI
10/19/99
$281.84
JERRY'S
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
252162/S
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL
- SUPPLI
10/19/99
$3.37
JERRY'S
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
252162 /S
PUBLIC HEALTH
GENERAL
SUPPLI
10/19/99
$36.80
JERRY'S
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
252162 /S.INSPECTIONS
GD
GENERAL
SUPPLI'
10/19/99
$13.06
JERRY'S
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES_
252162/S
CITY HALL GENE
GENERAL
SUPPLI
10/19/99
$45.20
JERRY'S
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
252162/S
PW BUILDING
GENERAL
SUPPLI
10/19/99
$217.88
JERRY'S
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES.
252162/S
EQUIPMENT OPER
GENERAL
SUPPLI
10/19/99
$20.14
JERRY'S
HARDWARE.
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
252162/S
PARK MAINTENAN
GENERAL
SUPPLIi
10/19/99
$225.49
JERRY'S
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
252162/S
BUILDING MAINT`GENERAL
JOHNSON
SUPPLI I
10/19/99
$52.44
JERRY'S
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
252162 /S
GOLF.ADMINISTR
GENERAL
SUPPLI
10/19/99
$22.31
JERRY'S
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
252162/S
RICHARDS MAINT
GENERAL
SUPPLI
10/19/99
$86.92
JERRY'S
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
252162/S
POOL OPERATION
GENERAL
SUPPLII
10/19/99
$20.74
JERRY'S
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
252162/S
ARENA ICE MAIN
GENERAL
SUPPLI
10/19/99
$107.53
JERRY'S
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
252162/S
ART CENTER BLD
GENERAL
SUPPLI
10/19/99
$76.77
JERRY'S
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
252162/S
ED BUILDING &
GENERAL
SUPPLII
10/19199
$191.90
JERRY'S
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
252162/S
PUMP & LIFT ST
GENERAL
SUPPLI
10/19/99
$16.67
JERRY'S
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
252162/S
YORK OCCUPANCY
GENERAL
SUPPLI
10/19/99
$14.35 .,JERRY'S
OF
HARDWARE
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
252162/S
VERNON OCCUPAN
GENERAL
SUPPLI
< *>
$1,817.34*
$930.20
JOHNSON
BROTHERS
LIQUOR
COST_
OF.GOODS-SOLD
204426 10/19/99 $28.12 JIM LUPIENT'S GM WORLD 0 Pipe assy
< *> $28.12*
33937:CV EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS
204429 10/19/99
- $90.95
JOHNSON
BROTHERS
LIQUOR
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
100034
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST-OF
GD
10/19/99
- $18.35
JOHNSON
BROTHERS
LIQUOR
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
101462
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF
GD
10/19/99
- $309.00
JOHNSON
BROTHERS
LIQUOR
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
.101463
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF
GD
10/19/99
$835.20
JOHNSON
BROTHERS_LIQUOR
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
1028025
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD
10/19/99
$2,2.16.65
JOHNSON
BROTHERS'LIQUOR
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
1028962
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD
10/19/99
$1,252.15
JOHNSON -
BROTHERS
LIQUOR
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
1028963
:50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
10/19/99
$4,652.02
JOHNSON
BROTHERS
LIQUOR
COST
OF.GOODS
SOLD
LI
1028964
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF
GD
10/19/99
$4,230.05
JOHNSON
BROTHERS
LIQUOR
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
1028965
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
10/19/99
$1,825.45:
JOHNSON
BROTHERS
LIQUOR
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
1028966.
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF
GD
10/19/99
$81436: -22 `::.
JOHNSON
BROTHERS
LIQUOR
COST:
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
1028967
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
10/19/99
$13:57
JOHNSON
BROTHERS
LIQUOR
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
1028968
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
10/19/99
$977.87.
JOHNSON
BROTHERS•LIQUOR
:COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
1028969
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
10/19/99
$1,022.15
JOHNSON
BROTHERS
LIQUOR.
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
1028970
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF
GD
10/19/99
$86.05
JOHNSON
BROTHERS
LIQUOR
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI.
1028972
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD
10/19/99
$930.20
JOHNSON
BROTHERS
LIQUOR
COST_
OF.GOODS-SOLD
-WI
1028973
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD
10/19/99
.$8,454.21
JOHNSON
BROTHERS
LIQUOR:
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD,
-WI
8454.21;
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF
GD
10/19/99
, $118.50
JOHNSON
BROTHERS.
LIQUOR
COST.OF
GOODS
SOLD
.,WI..
1029518
YORK.SELLING
CST
OF
GD
10/19/99
$717.15
JOHNSON'BROTHERS'.LIQUOR
COST
OF
GOODS�SOLD
-_LI
1029791
50TH
'ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
10/19/99
$2,868.60
JOHNSON
BROTHERS
LIQUOR
:COST
OF.GOODS`.SOLD
LI
1029792..
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF
GD
10/19/99
$2,151.45
JOHNSON
BROTHERS
LIQUOR.
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
1029793 ._VERNON
SELLING
CST
OF
GD
10/19/99
$172.30
JOHNSON
BROTHERS
LIQUOR
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
1031767_...:VERNON,SELLING
CST
OF
GD
10/19/99
$1,158.38
JOHNSON
BROTHERS
:LIQUOR
COST.OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
1031768
VERNON`SELLING
CST
OF
GD
10/19/99
$636.25
JOHNSON
BROTHERS
LIQUOR
COST;OF.000DS
SOLD
WI
1031769
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
10/19/99
$265.65
JOHNSON.BROTHERS
LIQUOR
COST
OF..GOODS
SOLD
WI
1031770
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF
GD
.:10/19/99
$3,597.42
JOHNSON
BROTHERS
LIQUOR
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
1031771
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF
GD
10/19/99
$4,191.36
JOHNSON
BROTHERS
LIQUOR
:COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
1031772
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF
GD
10/19/99
$71.10
JOHNSON
BROTHERS
LIQUOR
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
1031773
YORK..
SELLING
CST
OF
GD
10/19/9 9
$2,680:21
JOHNSON
BROTHERS
LIQUOR
COST
OF
GOODS:SOLD
LI
1031774
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WINE
LIQU
LIQU
WINE
LIQU
LIQU
LIQU
LIQU
WINE
LIQU
W
LIQU,
WINE
WINE
WINE,
LIQU
LIQU
LIQU
WINE
WINE
WINE.
WINE
LIQU
WINE
LIQU
5835
COUNCIL CHECK h_ -STER 13 -OCT -1999 (14. page 15
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
204429
10/19/99
$95.50
JOHNSON BROTHERS
LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
WI
1031775
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD WINE
10/19/99
$1,049.94
JOHNSON BROTHERS
LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
LI
1031776
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD LIQU
10/19/99
$95.15
JOHNSON BROTHERS
LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
WI
1031777
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD WINE
10/19/99
$608.40
JOHNSON BROTHERS
LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
WI
1031778
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD WINE
10/19/99
$0.65
JOHNSON BROTHERS
LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
LI
1031779
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD LIQU
10/19/99
$2,590.00
JOHNSON BROTHERS
LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
WI
1031780
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD WINE
10/19/99
$1,656.80
JOHNSON BROTHERS
LIQUOR
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
WI
1031181
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD WINE
< *>
$59,238.30*
204430
10/19/99
$35.50
JOHNSON, NAOMI
Art work sold
10/11/99
ART CNTR PROG
SALES OTHER
10/19/99
$182.40
JOHNSON, NAOMI
Craft supplies
10/11/99
ART CENTER ADM
CRAFT SUPPLIES
10/19/99
$15.50
JOHNSON, NAOMI
Maint. gen. supp.
10/11/99
ART CENTER BLD
GENERAL SUPPLI
10/19/99
$20.15
JOHNSON, NAOMI
Media gen. supp.
10/11/99
MEDIA LAB
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$253.55*
204431
10/19/99
$100.00
JOHNSON, WALTER
Police services,
Oct.
10/01/99
RESERVE PROGRA
CONTR SERVICES
< *>
$100.00*
204432
10/19/99
$441.00
JORDAN BEVERAGE
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
BE
62873
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GDS BEE
< *>
$441.00*
204433
10/19/99
$92.50
Kaman Industrial
Technol
Bearings x 2
2175488
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR
PARTS
6182
< *>
$92.50*
204434
10/19/99
$138.00
Kantor, Charles
Class refund
10/02/99
ART CNTR PROG
REGISTRATION F
< *>
$138.00*
204435
10/19/99
$106.66
KAR PRODUCTS
Shop supplies
583430
MAINT OF COURS
GENERAL SUPPLI
6139
< *>
$106.66*
204436
10/19/99
$2.11
KINKO'S
Printing
06220002
POLICE DEPT. G
PRINTING
10/19/99
$76.15
KINKO'S
Advertising
.06220002
GOLF DOME
ADVERT
OTHER
6087
< *>
$78.26*
204437
10/19/99
$100.00.
Kiwanis of Edina
Dues /subscrip
10/04/99
POLICE DEPT. G_DUES
&
SUBSCRI
< *>
$100.00*
204439
10/19/99
$1,220.00
Kiwi Kai Imports
Inc
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
WI
115567
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD WINE
10/19/99
$1,776.45
Kiwi Kai Imports
Inc
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
WI
116719
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD WINE
10/19/99
$897.80
Kiwi Kai Imports
Inc
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
WI
116723
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD WINE
10/19/99
$862.35
Kiwi Kai Imports
Inc
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
WI
116724
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD WINE
10/19/99
$128.50
Kiwi Kai Imports
Inc
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
BE
116725
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GDS BEE
10/19/99
$152.60
Kiwi Kai Imports
Inc
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
WI
116789
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD WINE
10/19/99
- $55.80
Kiwi Kai Imports
Inc
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
WI
CM915
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD WINE
10/19/99
$323.20
Kiwi Kai Imports
Inc
COST OF GOODS, °SOLD..WI
-
116886
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD WINE
10/19/99
$591.20
Kiwi Kai Imports
Inc
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
WI
117190
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD WINE
10/19/99
$500.00
Kiwi Kai Imports
Inc
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
BE
117192
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF.
GDS BEE
10/19/99
$319.00
Kiwi Kai Imports
Inc
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
BE
117194
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GDS BEE
10/19/99
$946.35
Kiwi Kai Imports
Inc
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
WI
117195
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD WINE
10/19/99
$159.50
Kiwi Kai Imports
-Inc
COST OF GOODS
'SOLD
BE
117196
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GDS BEE
10/19/99
$319.00
Kiwi Kai Imports
Inc
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
BE
117197
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GDS BEE
10/19/99
$1,768.45
Kiwi Kai Imports
Inc
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
WI
117198
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD WINE
< *>
$9,908.60*
204440
10/19/99
$7,083.20
Knish Construction Compa
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
99 -5(ENG
SIDEWALK -COUNT
CIP
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
13 -OCT -1999 (14:49) page 16
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<*>
$7,083.20*
204441
10/19/99
$18.20
KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT
clipboard
0217 -396
GENERAL MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
5714
10/19/99
$33.55
KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT
Fast setting concrete
0217 -396
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
5588
10/19/99
$60.53
KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT
Paint thinner,screws,
0217 -396
GENERAL MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
5772
10/19/99
$67.98
KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT
Siding,1x6,1x10,b1ade
0217 -397
GENERAL STORM
GENERAL SUPPLI
5781
10/19/99
$188.57
KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT
Framing blade, circ.
0217 -397
GENERAL MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
5788
10/19/99
$178.31
KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT
Wood stakes
0217 -398
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
5837
< *>
$547.14*
204442
10/19/99
$31.95
KOCHENASH, RICK
Craft supplies
10/11/99
ART CENTER ADM
CRAFT SUPPLIES
< *>
$31.95*
204443
10/19/99
$3,355.35
KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
250105
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
10/19/99
$15.95
KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
250106
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
10/19/99
$1,062.00
KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
250050
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
10/19/99
$87.00
KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
250745
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MI'X
10/19/99
$5,006.95
KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO
COST OF GOODS. SOLD BE
250745
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
< *>
$9,527.25*
204444
10/19/99
$2,934.18
KUNDE CO INC
Oak Wilt Tree Inspect
005868
TREES & MAINTE
PROF SERVICES
CONTRACT
< *>
$2,934.18*
204445
10/19/99
$40.00
L.M.C.
Subscrip. 1 yr.
6946
ADMINISTRATION
DUES & SUBSCRI
< *>
$40.00*
204446
10/19/99
$24,206.64
LaBreche & Murray Public
About-Town
01662
COMMUNICATIONS
MAG /NEWSLET EX
< *>
$24,206.64*
204447
10/19/99
$200.55
Lake Management Inc.
DNR Permit
94 -1751
PONDS & LAKES
PROF SERVICES
5607
< *>
$200.55*
204448
10/19/99
$1,010.00
LAKE RESTORATION INC
Pond trtmnt /permit
9141
PONDS & LAKES
PROF SERVICES
5005
10/19/99
$473.00
LAKE RESTORATION INC
Pond treatment
9142
PONDS & LAKES
PROF SERVICES
5603
10/19/99
$322.00
LAKE RESTORATION INC
Pond treatment.
9143
PONDS & LAKES
PROF SERVICES
5604
< *>
$1,805.00*
204449
10/19/99
$1,181.77
LANIER WORLDWIDE INC
Equip. replace (2 rec
59614252
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP REPLACEM
3031
< *>
$1,181.77*
204450
10/19/99
$128.91
Lathrop Paint Supply Com
Paint,wash,brushs,pri
748069
PAVEMENT MARKI
GENERAL SUPPLI
5792
< *>
$128.91*
204451
10/19/99
$283.31
LAWSON PRODUCTS INC.
Washers,nuts,silicone
1048129
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
1876
10/19/99
$290.60
LAWSON PRODUCTS INC.
Ty- Rap,Tub Connector,
1164262
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
5784
10/19/99
$123.17
LAWSON PRODUCTS INC.
USS Flat washer
1164264
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
5785
10/19/99
$428.68
LAWSON PRODUCTS INC.
Alloy thread rod, con
1170956
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
5856
< *>
$1,125.76*
'
204452
10/19/99
$49.50
LEEF BROS. INC.
Office furnishings
939176
ART CENTER BLD
LAUNDRY
10/19/99
$47.58
LEEF BROS. INC.
Office furnishings
956644
ART CENTER BLD
LAUNDRY
10/19/99
$16.64
LEEF BROS. INC.
Towels
959334
MAINT OF LOURS
LAUNDRY
10/19/99
$47:58
LEEF BROS. INC.
Office furnishings
991577
ART CENTER BLD
LAUNDRY
10/19/99
$16.68
LEEF BROS. INC.
Towels
994285
MAINT OF COURS
LAUNDRY
< *>
$177.98*
COUNCIL CHECK RL_-STER
13 -OCT -1999 (14: - -_, page 17
CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
204453 10/19/99 $408.17 LEITNER COMPANY Soil 163958 CENTENNIAL LAK FERTILIZER
< *> $408..17*
204454 10/19/99
204455 10/19/99
204457 10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
204458 10/19/99
10/19/99
$930.23 LESCO SERVICE CENTER Chemicals
$930.23*
$18,099.00 LMCIT
$18,099.00*
$5,113.78
$2,597.50
$4,679.52
$248.96
$6,705.61
$740.84
$2,469.47
$9,291.40
$1,023.07
$5,133.84
$2,607.69
$4,697.89
$249.94
$177.08
$743.75
$566.67
$602.08
$2,192.19
$42.41
$49,883.69*
$76.42
$108.34
$184.76*
LOGIS
LOGIS
LOGIS
LOGIS
LOGIS
LOGIS
LOGIS
LOGIS
LOGIS
LOGIS
LOGIS
LOGIS
LOGIS
LOGIS
LOGIS
LOGIS
LOGIS
LOGIS
LOGIS
LYNDALE GARDEN CENTER
LYNDALE GARDEN CENTER
LMC Dues
9RFAL3 MAINT OF COURS.CHEMICALS 6149
09/01/99 ADMINISTRATION DUES & SUBSCRI
DATA PROCESSING
AR0799
DATA PROCESSING
AR0799
DATA PROCESSING
AR0799
DATA PROCESSING
AR0799
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
AR0799
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AR0799
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AR0799
NEW EQUIPMENT
AR0799
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AR0799
DATA PROCESSING
AR0899
DATA PROCESSING
AR0899
DATA PROCESSING
AR0899
DATA PROCESSING
AR0899
DATA PROCESSING
AR0899
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
AR0899
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AR0899
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AR0899
NEW EQUIPMENT
AR0899
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
AR0899
Pruning sealer x12 115016
Root stimulator, soil 115624
FINANCE DATA PROCESSIN
ASSESSING DATA PROCESSIN
GENERAL(BILLIN DATA PROCESSIN
COMMUNICATIONS DATA PROCESSIN
ENGINEERING GE EQUIP REPLACEM
ENGINEERING GE PROF SERVICES
CENT SVC GENER PROF SERVICES
CENT SVC GENER NEW EQUIP
MEDIA LAB PROF SERVICES
FINANCE DATA PROCESSIN
ASSESSING DATA PROCESSIN
GENERAL(BILLIN DATA PROCESSIN
COMMUNICATIONS DATA PROCESSIN
CENT SVC GENER DATA PROCESSIN
CENT SVC GENER CONF & SCHOOLS
ENGINEERING GE PROF SERVICES
CENT SVC GENER PROF SERVICES
CENT SVC GENER NEW EQUIP
INSPECTIONS EQUIP REPLACEM
TREES & MAINTE TOOLS 5051
POOL TRACK GRE FERTILIZER 2167
204459
10/19/99
$730.39
MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC.
Carbide Dirt Shoe Run
2996263
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
5733
10/19/99
$215.94
MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC.
Mandrel,Elgin tuf,frt
2996305
STREET CLEANIN
BROOMS
5760
10/19/99
$169.36
MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC.
Ball socket field
2996435
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
5855
10/19/99
$21.79
MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC.
Seal for gear box
2996463
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
5843
10/19/99
$215.52
MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC.
Motor blower, A/C res
2996479
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
5846
< *>
$1,353.00*
204460
10/19/99
$93.75
Macari, Stacie
Skating instruction
10/05/99
POOL TRACK GRE
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$93.75*
204461
10/19/99
$18,496.33
Maertens - Brenny Construc
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
09/30/99
UG STORAGE TAN
CIP
< *>
$18,496.33*
204462
10/19/99
$306.99
Mail Handling Services
Flushing postcards
058900
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPLI
5867
10/19/99
$356.65
Mail Handling Services.
Hydrant,flush mailing
59034
DISTRIBUTION
CONTR REPAIRS
5961
< *>
$663.64*
204463
10/19/99
$201.56
Mairs, Candyce
Skate pro ses I ED /CL
09/30/99
POOL,TRACK GRE.PROF
SERVICES
< *>
$201.56*
204464
10/19/99
$666.00
MARGROM SKOGLUND WINE IM
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
10005130
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 13 -OCT -1999 (14:49) page 18
CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT
------------------------------------------------------------
<*> $666.00*
204467 10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
204468 10/19/99
204469 10/19/99
10/19/99
204470 10/1.9/99
10/19/99
204471 10/19/99
< *>
204472 10/19/99
< *>
204473 10/19/99
$846.40
$536.05
$1,387.75
$27.00
$2,672.70
$25.75
$123.00
$1,385.40
$2,210.85
$22.95
$7.50
$1,621.15
$20.20
$9.00
$276.85
$34.00
$1,802.15
$27.00
$34.00
$55.95
$3,589.90
$18.00
$170.00
$325.00
$37..30
$678.90
$682.10
$22.95
$33.50
$1,272.60
$35.40
$7.50.
$170.00
$20,168.80*
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK_VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
.MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES,
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK,_VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK.VII.SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII...SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
$35.00.. Martin, Kim
$35.00*
$31.61 MATHISON CO, THE
$2.78. MATHISON CO, THE
$28.83*
$8'44:12 MCCAREN DESIGN
$224.50 . MCCAREN DESIGN
$1,068.62*
$111.00 MCHUGH, FLORENCE
$111.00*
$93.00 Mchugh, Lydia...
$93.00*
$36.38 MCM Electronics
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 953614
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 953723
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 953802
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 953803
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 953814
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 953815
Beer COGS 955544.
COST OF GOODS,:SOLD BE 956034
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 956210
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 956211
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 956212
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 956213
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 956214
_COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 9562.15
COST OF GOODS: SOLD BE 956360
COST OF GOODS'`SOLD BE 956362.
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 956442
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 956443
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 956444
COST OF:GOODS SOLD BE 956461
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 956462
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 956463
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 956464
COST OF GOODS,SOLD.BE 957461
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI.957462
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE.958686
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 958822
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 958823
COST OF GOODS;.SOLD,MI 958824
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 958825
COST OF GOODS.SOLD.MI 958826
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 958827
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 958828
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE
50TH.ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
GRILL CST.OF GDS BEE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE
VERNON,SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
YORK,SELLING. CST OF GDS BEE
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
50TH ST SELLIN CST AF GDS BEE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE
YORK.SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
VERNON..SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
Art program 11/23/99 10/06/99 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER
PO NUM
9034
COGS 178645 -0 ART SUPPLY GIF COST OF GD SOL 9025
COGS C- 178645.:ART-.SUPPLY GIF COST OF GD SOL 9025
soil, plants
Rental, tree gantry
Class refund
Class refund
Media repair parts
11050 POOL.;.TRACK.'GRE FERTILIZER 2159
11053 . POOL TRACK GRE PROF SERVICES 2153
10/05/99 ART CNTR PROG
09/21/99 ART CNTR PROG
821883 MEDIA LAB
REGISTRATION F
REGISTRATION F
REPAIR PARTS 9020
COUNCIL
CHECK i.
ASTER
13 -OCT -1999 (14.
i page 19
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
------------------------------------------------------------------------
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
------------------------------------------------------------
<*>
$36.38*
204474
10/19/99
$648.14
MDS Matrx Medical Inc
Ambulance supplies
678755
FIRE DEPT. GEN
FIRST AID SUPP
3561
10/19/99
$126.66
MDS Matrx Medical Inc
Ambulance supplies
679592
FIRE DEPT. GEN
FIRST AID SUPP
3110
< *>
$774.80*
204475
10/19/99
$375.00
MEDICINE SHOW MUSIC CO
Music program'11 /15/9
10/03/99
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$375.00*
204476
10/19/99
$437.13
Medtronic Physic Control
Electrodes, pacing
IV483368
FIRE DEPT. GEN
FIRST AID SUPP
3560
10/19/99
$711.00
Medtronic Physio Control
Lifepak maint.
486725
FIRE DEPT. GEN
FIRST .AID SUPP
9763
10/19/99
$777.00
Medtronic Physio Control
Serv. Cont.. Defibs
IV 48669
POLICE DEPT. G
SVC CONTR EQUI
< *>
$1,925.13*
204477
10/19/99
$42.24
MENARDS ACCT #35170288
Clock, pruner
95697
POOL TRACK ORE
GENERAL SUPPLI
2161
< *>
$42.24*
204478
10/19/99
$169.60
MENARDS * ACCT #30240251
Supplies
45510
MAINT OF LOURS
GENERAL SUPPLI
6142
10/19/99
$882.89
MENARDS * ACCT #30240251
Generator
46094
GOLF DOME
REPAIR PARTS .
6146
< *>
$1,052.49*
204479
10/19/99
$100.00
MERFELD, BURT
Police services, Oct.
10/01/99
RESERVE PROGRA
CONTR SERVICES
< *>
$100.00*
204480
10/19/99
$177.86
MERIT SUPPLY.
Tissues, towels
52005
PW BUILDING
CLEANING SUPPL
5865
10/19/99
$354.43
MERIT SUPPLY
Repair Parts for Aqua
51921
POOL TRACK ORE
REPAIR PARTS
2154
10/19/99
$854.13
MERIT SUPPLY
20" Matador
51937
POOL TRACK ORE
GENERAL SUPPLI
2040
10/19/99
$499.27
MERIT SUPPLY
45 gal. ranger x 2
51982
ARENA,BLDG /GRO
CLEANING SUPPL
8049
10/19/99
$542.03
MERIT SUPPLY
Mericlean,bath&body,t
51983
POOL TRACK ORE
CLEANING SUPPL
2162
10/19/99
$406.83
MERIT SUPPLY
LPS, Expel
52018
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
5871
< *>
$2,834.55*
204481
10/19/99
$93.61
METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY
White field marking p
38440
FIELD MAINTENA
LINE MARK POWD
5584
< *>
$93.61*
204482
10/19/99
$399.37
Metro - Cleaning Services
Ductwork cleaning
8578
CITY HALL GENE
CONTR REPAIRS
4474
< *>
$399.37*
204483
10/19/99
$43.41
Metrocall
Wireless Services
1145247
GENERAL MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
4502
< *>
$43.41*
204484
10/19/99
$53,513.46
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
SAC August
PAY DIFF
GENERAL FD PRO
SAC CHARGES
< *>
$53,513.46*
204485
10/19/99
$3,564.00
MIDWEST AQUA CARE
Weed control /centenni
10/08/99
CENTENNIAL LAK
SVC CONTR EQUI
7033
< *>
$3,564.00*
204486
10/19/99
$37,095.00
MIDWEST,ASPHALT CORP.
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
990 -4 (E
STRT RESURFACI
CIP
< *>
$37,095.00*
204487
10/19/99
$53.91
Midwest Badge & Novelty
craft items
104571
ART SUPPLY GIF
CRAFT SUPPLIES
9017
< *>
$53.91*
204488
10/19/99
$121.35
MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
62173097
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MIX
10/19/99
$177.15
MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
65198233
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
$63.70
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
13 -OCT -1999
(14:49) page 20
CHECK -NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
204488
10/19/99
$55.25
MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI
Coke
66686043
GRILL
COST OF GD
SOL�9046
10/19/99
- $45.00
MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI
Coke
66686050
GRILL
COST OF GD
SOI�6046
HEAT
10/19/99
$28.50
MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI
Coke
66686068
GRILL
COST OF GD
SOL.9046
MINNEGASCO
10/19/99
$105.55
MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
62175068
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS
MIX,
$308.96
10/19/99
$275.35
MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
62475060
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS
MIX
< *>
$224.59
$718.15*
HEAT
10/19/99
$674.68
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
204489
10/19/99
$391.05
MINN COMM PAGING
Pager svc, 4th qtr.
30343010
POOL TRACK GRE
SVC CONTR
EQUIi CONTRACT.
< *>
$391.05*
$18.57
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
< *>
$5,321.64*
204490
10/19/99
$1,076.50
MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN S
replace services
31599
DISTRIBUTION
-CONTR REPAIRS
5654
$339.01*
10/19/99
$945.00
MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN S
Replace service
31608..
DISTRIBUTION
CONTR REPAIRS
5964
< *>
$86.73*
$2,021.50*
204495
10/19/99
.$898.75
MINNESOTA PIPE& EQUIPME
i
204492
10/19/99
$129.78
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
06000610
FIRE DEPT. GEN
HEAT
204497 10/19/99
204498 10/19/99
10/19/99
204499 10/19/99
06000610 CITY HALL GENE HEAT
06000610 PW BUILDING HEAT.
06000610 BUILDING MAINT HEAT
06000610 ART CENTER BLD HEAT
06000610 POOL OPERATION HEAT
06000610 CLUB HOUSE HEAT
06000610 MAINT OF COURS HEAT
06000610 GOLF DOME HEAT
06000610 FRED RICHARDS HEAT
06000610 ARENA - BLDG /GRO'HEAT
06000610 POOL TRACK GRE HEAT
06000610 CENTENNIAL LAK HEAT.
06000610 PUMP & LIFT ST HEAT
06000610 DISTRIBUTION HEAT
06000610 50TH ST OCCUPA HEAT
06000610 YORK OCCUPANCY HEAT
06000610 VERNON OCCUPAN HEAT
50690 ART SUPPLY GIF COST OF GD SOL 9038
10/11/99 GENERAL FD PRO CASH OVER AND
77668 DISTRIBUTION REPAIR PARTS 1 5006
0080121 GENERAL STORM GENERAL SUPPLI 5962
100983 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 3580
$2,612.50 MINNESOTA VALLEY LANDSCA CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 98 -5(HRA UTILITIES -GRAN CIP
$2;612.50*
$309.06 MINNESOTA WANNER
- $56.32 MINNESOTA WANNER
$365.38*
$51.70 MINNESOTA'S BOOKSTORE
Welding roller for fl 0042488- EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 5841
Brass Mpt,Trigger Val 0042429I EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 5738
Code books, kiehn 4 CODE B INSPECTIONS
BOOKS & PAMPHL
10/19/99
$63.70
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
10/19/99
$206.69
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
10/19/99
$681.58
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
10/19/99
$128.69
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
10/19/99
$0.00
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
10/19/99
$104.36
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
10/19/99
$24.25
MINNEGASCO-
HEAT
10/19/99
$53.25
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
10/19/99
$13.73
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
10/19/99
$2,513.77
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
10/19/99
$308.96
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
10/19/99
$148.95
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
10/19/99
$224.59
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
10/19/99
$674.68
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
10/19/99
$10.11
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
10/19/99
$15.98
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
10/19/99
$18.57
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
< *>
$5,321.64*
204493
10/19/99
$339.01
MINNESOTA CLAY USA
COGS
< *>
$339.01*
204494
10/19/99
$86.73
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF
Unclaimed property
< *>
$86.73*
-
204495
10/19/99
.$898.75
MINNESOTA PIPE& EQUIPME
repair parts
10/19/99
$96.38
MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPME
PVC flap gate.
< *>
$995.13*
204496
10/19/99
$257.73
MINNESOTA TROPHIES & GIF
Plaques
< *>
$257.73*
204497 10/19/99
204498 10/19/99
10/19/99
204499 10/19/99
06000610 CITY HALL GENE HEAT
06000610 PW BUILDING HEAT.
06000610 BUILDING MAINT HEAT
06000610 ART CENTER BLD HEAT
06000610 POOL OPERATION HEAT
06000610 CLUB HOUSE HEAT
06000610 MAINT OF COURS HEAT
06000610 GOLF DOME HEAT
06000610 FRED RICHARDS HEAT
06000610 ARENA - BLDG /GRO'HEAT
06000610 POOL TRACK GRE HEAT
06000610 CENTENNIAL LAK HEAT.
06000610 PUMP & LIFT ST HEAT
06000610 DISTRIBUTION HEAT
06000610 50TH ST OCCUPA HEAT
06000610 YORK OCCUPANCY HEAT
06000610 VERNON OCCUPAN HEAT
50690 ART SUPPLY GIF COST OF GD SOL 9038
10/11/99 GENERAL FD PRO CASH OVER AND
77668 DISTRIBUTION REPAIR PARTS 1 5006
0080121 GENERAL STORM GENERAL SUPPLI 5962
100983 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 3580
$2,612.50 MINNESOTA VALLEY LANDSCA CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 98 -5(HRA UTILITIES -GRAN CIP
$2;612.50*
$309.06 MINNESOTA WANNER
- $56.32 MINNESOTA WANNER
$365.38*
$51.70 MINNESOTA'S BOOKSTORE
Welding roller for fl 0042488- EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 5841
Brass Mpt,Trigger Val 0042429I EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 5738
Code books, kiehn 4 CODE B INSPECTIONS
BOOKS & PAMPHL
:OUNCIL
CHECK Rc.__STER
13 -OCT -1999 (14:s.j page 21
:HECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<*>
$51.70*
204500
10/19/99
$92.66
Mitchell /Repair Informat
Windows 1 yr renewal
5621602
EQUIPMENT OPER
DATA PROCESSIN
5761
< *>
$92.66*
204501
10/19/99
$50.00
MOBILE CELLULAR UNLIMITE
Cell phone 2900
INV 9909
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP MAINT
3028
< *>
$50.00*
204502
10/19/99
$55.00
MTGF Conference
MTGF Registration
10/08/99
ED ADMINISTRAT
CONF & SCHOOLS
< *>
$55.00*
204503
10/19/99
$99.79
MTI DISTRIBUTING CO
Castor fork
2288584
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
3764
10/19/99
$82.97
MTI DISTRIBUTING CO
Irrigation Parts
2305167
CENTENNIAL LAK
REPAIR PARTS
2036
10/19/99
$31.08
MTI DISTRIBUTING CO
Repair parts
1305797
MAINT OF LOURS
REPAIR PARTS
6120 '
< *>
$213.84*
204504
10/19/99
$119.23
MUNICILITE CO
Magnetic strobe
11586
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
5836
< *>
$119.23*
204505
10/19/99
$138.75
MUZAK
Music services, Oct -D
A233657
CENTENNIAL LAK
SVC CONTR EQUI
< *>
$138.75*
204506
10/19/99
$870.60
NAME BRAND SPORTS
Uniforms
9698
CENTENNIAL LAK
LAUNDRY
2042
< *>
$870.60*
204507
10/19/99
$127.70
National Fire Protection
Brochiures
0551628
FIRE DEPT. GEN
FIRE PREVENTIO
3553
< *>
$127.70*
204508
10/19/99
$49.88
National Publishers Netw
Magazine subscription
5380326
GOLF ADMINISTR
DUES & SUBSCRI
6086
< *>
$49.88*
204509
10/19/99
$694.00
New France Wine Co
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
1007
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
< *>
$694.00*
204510
10/19/99
$100.00
NISSEN, DICK
Police services, Oct.
10/01/99
RESERVE PROGRA
CONTR SERVICES
< *>
$100.00*
204511
.10/19/99
$86.12
NORMAN, POLLY
Craft supplies
10111199
ART CENTER ADM
CRAFT SUPPLIES
< *>
$86.12*
204512
1.0/19/99
$179.10
North Hennepin Community
Supervisor class Koma
6445
GOLF ADMINISTR
CONF & SCHOOLS
6046
< *>
$179.10*
204513
10/19/99
$30.60
NORTH STAR ICE
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
48436
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MIX
10/19/99
$71.40
NORTH STAR ICE
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
48439
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
10/19/99
$104.70
NORTH STAR ICE
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
49562
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
10/19/99
$81.60
NORTH STAR ICE
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
49563
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
10/19/99
$40.80
NORTH STAR ICE
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
49564
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MIX
< *>
$329.10*
204514
10/19/99
$39.61
NORTH STAR TURF
Repair Parts
214075
MAINT OF LOURS
REPAIR PARTS
6137
10/19/99
$68.18
NORTH STAR TURF
2 JAC Breakers
214194
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS
6141
< *>
$107.79*
204515
10/19/99
$39,454.65
Northern Escrow Inc. &
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
09/30/99
W 48TH STORM
CIP
13 -OCT -1999 (14:49) page 22
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM--- - -
- - -- OBJECT-- - - -
-PO NUM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
<*>
$39,454.65*
204516
10/19/99
$26.60
Northern Tool & Equipmen
Blo -Guns Ext, Air Hos
82206988
FIRE DEPT. GEN
HAZARD.
MATERI
3550
< *>
$26.60*
204517
10/19/99
$86.10
Northland Chemical Corp
Dissolve cleaner
042436
PW BUILDING
CLEANING SUPPL
5866
< *>
$86.10*
204518
10/19/99
$157.50
NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY
COGS
16288500
ART SUPPLY GIF
COST OF
GD SOL
9027
10/19/99
$21.38
NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY
COGS
16300000
ART SUPPLY GIF
COST OF
GD SOL
9027
10/19/99
$48.66
NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY
COGS
16311100
ART SUPPLY GIF
COST OF
GD SOL
9027
10/19/99
$23.04
NORTHWEST GRAPHIC `SUPPLY
COGS
16309600
ART SUPPLY GIF
COST OF
GD SOL
9027
10/19/99
$285.84
NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY
COGS
16320800
ART SUPPLY GIF
COST OF
GD SOL
9031
10/19/99
- $60.91
NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY
COGS
16376700
ART SUPPLY GIF
COST OF
GD SOL
3639
< *>
$475.51*
204519
10/19/99
$93.04
NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO
Tires,
NW 58059
EQUIPMENT OPER
TIRES &
TUBES
5673
< *>
$93.04*
204520
10/19/99
$15.00
O'Kelley, Nicole
Class refund
09/21/99
ART CNTR PROG
REGISTRATION F
< *>
$15.00*
204521
10/19/99
$40.00
OHLORST, LYNN
Art program 11/18/99
10/06/99
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC
OTHER
< *>
$40.00*
204522
10/19/99
$132.11
Olsen Chain & Cable Cc I
Screwdriver x 2, glov
121583
MAINT OF COURS
GENERAL
SUPPLI
6145
< *>
$132.11*
204523
10/19/99
.$9,373.50
ORVIS, JOAN
Prof Services Skating
092999
ARENA ADMINIST.
PRO SVC
OTHER
< *>
$9,373.50*
204524
10/19/99
$83.00
Otis Spunkmeyer Inc
Cookies
84465894
GRILL
COST OF
GD SOL
9037
< *>
$83.00*
204525
10/19/99
$461.76
PageNet
Pager rental
064 -0147
FIRE DEPT. GEN
EQUIP RENTAL
10/19/99
$5.66
,PageNet
Custodian pager
064 -A331
CITY HALL GENE
GENERAL
SUPPLI
10/19/99
$384.19
PageNet
Pagers -Sept.
U 064 -A3
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP RENTAL
< *>
$851.61*
204526
10/19/99
$95.75
Park Lighting Inc
BTL Lamp lights x 4
002497
POOL TRACK GRE
GENERAL
SUPPLI
2152
< *>
$95.75*
204527
10/19/99
$75.00
Partners in Praise
Music program 11/28/9
08/29/99
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC
OTHER
< *>
$75.00*
204528
10/19/99
$1,420.07
PARTS PLUS
Misc. parts
209926
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR
PARTS
< *>
$1,420.07*
204529
10/19/99
$941.42
Peer Enviro & Eng` Resour
UST Removal &Soil moni
0006856
PW BUILDING
REPAIR
PARTS
5282
< *>
$941.42*
204530
10/19/99
$200.55
PEPSI -COLA COMPANY
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
29152256
YORK SELLING
CST OF
GDS MIX
< *>
$200.55*
204533
10/19/99
-$8.27
PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
3200255
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF
GD WINE
= OUNCIL
CHECK R.
jTER
13 -OCT -1999
(14:•_ , page 23
-"HECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT PO NUM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
204533
10/19/99
- $49.65
PHILLIPS
WINE
&
SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
3200769
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WINE
10/19/99
-$4.41
PHILLIPS
WINE
&
SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
3201035
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WINE
10/19/99
-$4.12
PHILLIPS
WINE
&
SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
3201036
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WINE
10/19/99
-$5.99
PHILLIPS
WINE
&
SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
3201037
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WINE
10/19/99
-$4.12
PHILLIPS
WINE
&
SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
3201038
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WINE
10/19/99
-$5.99
PHILLIPS
WINE
&
SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
3201039
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WINE
10/19/99
- $60.00
PHILLIPS
WINE
&
SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
3201129
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WINE
10/19/99
- $25.00
PHILLIPS
WINE
&
SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
3201512
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WINE
10/19/99
- $38.50
PHILLIPS
WINE
&
SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
3201513
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WINE
10/19/99
-$5.59
PHILLIPS
WINE
&
SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
3201813
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WINE
10/19/99
-$7.59
PHILLIPS
WINE
&
SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
3201814
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WINE
10/19/99
- $42.50
PHILLIPS
WINE
&
SPIRITS
.COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD.WI
3201815
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WINE
10/19/99
- $25.60
PHILLIPS
WINE
&
SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
3201914
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WINE
10/19/99
- $28.10
PHILLIPS
WINE
&
SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
3201915
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WINE
10/19/99
- $75.35
PHILLIPS
WINE
&
SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
3201916
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WINE
10/19/99
- $18.35
PHILLIPS
WINE
&
SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
3201963
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WINE
10/19/99
$1,244.75
PHILLIPS
WINE
&
SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
538148
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WINE
10/19/99
$494.60
PHILLIPS
WINE
&
SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
538149
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WINE
10/19/99
$644.20
PHILLIPS
WINE
&
SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
538150
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WINE
10/19/99
$374.96
PHILLIPS
WINE
&
SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
538151
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
LIQU
10/19/99
$217.50
PHILLIPS
WINE
&
SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
538152
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WINE
10/19/99
$984.45
PHILLIPS
WINE
&
SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
538153
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD
LIQU
10/19/99
$3,851.00
PHILLIPS
WINE
&
SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
538154
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WINE
10/19/99
$335.70
PHILLIPS
WINE
&
SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
538155
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD
LIQU
10/19/99
$808.95
PHILLIPS
WINE
&
SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
538156
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WINE
10/19/99
$711.85
PHILLIPS
WINE
&
SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
540449
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WINE
10/19/99
$748.75
PHILLIPS
WINE
&
SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
540451
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WINE
10/19/99
$296.05
PHILLIPS
WINE
&
SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
540452
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WINE
10/19/99
$232.39
PHILLIPS
WINE
&
SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
540453
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
LIQU
10/19/99
$404.95
PHILLIPS
WINE
&
SPIRITS
COST
OF.
GOODS
SOLD
WI
540454
50TH ST SELLIN.CST
OF
GD
WINE
10/19/99
$771.05
PHILLIPS
WINE
&
SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
540455
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD
LIQU
10/19/99
$1,159.85
PHILLIPS
WINE
&
SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
540456
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WINE
10/19/99
$297.15
PHILLIPS
WINE
&
SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
MI
540457
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GDS
MIX
10/19/99
$468.07
PHILLIPS
WINE
&
SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
540458
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD
LIQU
10/19/99
$1,052.15
PHILLIPS
WINE
&
SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
540459
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WINE
< *>
$14,689.24*
204534
10/19/99
- $79.97
Pinnacle
Distributing
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
MI
594787
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GDS
MIX
10/19/99
$799.72
Pinnacle
Distributing
COST.OF
GOODS
SOLD
MI
594803
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GDS
MIX
10/19/99
$719.75
Pinnacle
Distributing
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
MI
594862
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GDS
MIX
10/19/99
$610.47
Pinnacle
Distributing
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
594898
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GDS
MIX
10/19/99
- $26.66
Pinnacle
Distributing
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
MI
594971
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GDS
MIX
10/19/99
$853.04
Pinnacle
Distributing
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
MI
594978
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GDS
MIX
10/19/99
$559.82
Pinnacle
Distributing
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
MI
595038
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GDS
MIX
< *>
$3,436.17*
204535
10/19/99
$117.52
Pirtek Plymouth
Repair
olympic
PL6125
ARENA ICE MAIN
CONTR
REPAIRS 8053
< *>
$117.52*
204536
10/19/99
$100.00
POSTMASTER
permit
#939
10/01/99
GENERAL(BILLIN
POSTAGE
< *>
$100.00*
204537
10/19/99
$285.00
POSTMASTER
Mailing
for Sr
Ctr
Ne
092899
CENT SVC GENER
POSTAGE
< *>
$285.00*
COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER
13 -OCT -1999 (14:49)
CHECK NO DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
--------------------------------------------
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
204538 10/19/99
$601.73
-------------- - - - - --
Print Shop, The
Monthly newsletter
8942
SENIOR CITIZEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
10/19/99
$599.60
Print Shop, The
Monthly newsletter
9115
SENIOR CITIZEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
10/19/99
$659.77
Print Shop, The
Monthly newsletter
9356
SENIOR CITIZEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$1,861.10*
WI
114852
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
204539 10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
10/19/99
204540 10/19/99
204541 10/19/99
204542 10/19/99
204543 10/19/99
204544 10/19/99
204545 10/19/99
204546 10/19/99
204547 10/19/99
204548 10/19/99
204549 10/19/99
204550 10/19/99
10/19/99
< *>
204551 10/19/99
204552 10/19/99
$2,112.39
$88.55
$603.11
$88.55
$1,435.35
$168.30
$1,081.70
$689.15
$850.27
$7,117.37*
$31.00
$31.00*
$698.00
$698.00*
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
PRO GUARD
Puckett, Kirby
$45.53 QUALITY FLOW SYSTEMS
$45.53*
$62.72 R.B. Whitacre & Co
$62.72*
$100.00 RAINS, DIANE
$100.00*
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 112230 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 112233 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 112235 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
page 24
PO NUM
4246
4310
4456
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
112239
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WINE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
112243
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WINE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
114852
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WINE:
37503211
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
115656
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WINE
RMA
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
115659
50TH
ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WINE
$103.00
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
115667
YORK
SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WINE
$853.00 RAYMOND HAEG PLUMBING
$853.00*
Cr taken twice 156560A ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPLI18046
Ambulance overpayment 10/07/99 GENERAL FD PRO AMBULANCE FEESi
Screw-pin shackle 6471 PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPLL 5774
Inc Topog. gasket 135378 CITY HALL GENE REPAIR.PARTS 5683
$4.31 Red Rooster Auto Stores
$4.31*
$100.00 RICKERT, DAVID
$100.00*
Performance 11/30/99 10/04/99 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER
Plumbing new addition 09/17/99 MEDIA LAB CONS CIP 3098
Gasket remover 66517 MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPLI 6136
Prof. serv. 10/11/99 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES
$204.83
RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED
Fulton jack & bracket
1118478-
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
5844
$204.83*
$424.07
RINK SYSTEMS INC
Replacement netting f
2016
ARENA ICE MAIN
CONTR REPAIRS
8045
$424.07*
$10.64
Ritz Camerae
Photo card
37502556
FIRE DEPT. GEN.PHOTO
SUPPLIES
9762
$10.63
Ritz Camera
Film
37503211
FIRE DEPT.:GEN
PHOTO SUPPLIES
9762
$21.27*
$82.50
RMA
Call letters 9 -99
100199
.GENERAL FD PRO
AMBULANCE FEES
$82.50*
$103.00
Robinson, Diane
Class refund
09/21/99
ART CNTR PROG
REGISTRATION
F
$103.00*
COUNCIL
CHECK R_
STER
13 -OCT -1999 (14:.
page 25
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
204553
10/19/99
$69.00
Rockhurst College
Continuing ed
60259004
INSPECTIONS
CONF & SCHOOLS
< *>
$69.00*
204554
10/19/99
$30.00
ROFIDAL, KEVIN
Gas reimb ert van
10/04/99
POLICE DEPT. G
MILEAGE
< *>
$30.00*
204555
10/19/99
$40,019.34
Ron Kassa Construction I
CONSTR, IN PROGRESS
99 -2(ENG
SIDEWALK -MAPLE
CIP
< *>
$40,019.34*
204556
10/19/99
$46.00
Ron's Mechanical
Duplicate
99002791
GENERAL FD PRO
MECHAN PERMITS
< *>
$46.00*
204557
10/19/99
$101.12
SAFETY KLEEN
Brake cleaner /stand a
270669
SUPERV. & OVRH
HAZ. WASTE DIS
5157
< *>
$101.12*
204558
10/19/99
$245.00
SANDERS WACKER WEHRMAN B
Landscape svcs.
9960 -25
STREET IMPROVE
CIP
10/19/99
$455.00
SANDERS WACKER WEHRMAN B
Landscape services
9811 -13
UTILITIES -GRAN
CIP
< *>
$700.00*
204559
10/19/99
$115.00
SCHATTAUER, JIM
Music program 11/16/9
10/03/99
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$115.00*
204560
10/19/99
$160.00
SCHEERER, MARTIN
MN Fire'Chiefs Confer
09/22/99
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONF & SCHOOLS
< *>
$160.00*
204561
10/19/99
$34.03
SCHMOLL, RUTH
Orange drink for open
10/10/99
FIRE DEPT. GEN
MEETING EXPENS
< *>
$34.03*
204562
10/19/99
$676.38
SECURITY LINK FROM AMERI
Alarm contract
36324601
CLUB HOUSE
ALARM SERVICE
6079
10/19/99
$179.69
SECURITY LINK FROM AMERI
Alarm svc. 4th qtr.
36324666
ART CENTER BLD
ALARM SERVICE
< *>
$856.07*
204563
10/19/99
$408.03
SEH
Water supply plan upd
0057462
GENERAL(BILLIN
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$408.03*
204564
10/19/99
$213.00
SERV -A -CLEAN
carpet cleaning
1619
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONTR REPAIRS
< *>
$213.00*
204565
10/19/99
$1,310.99
SGN
Wooddale building arc
1496
PKBOND CIP
PROF SERVICES
PROD. #96
< *>
$1,310.99*
204566
10/19/99
$100.00
SHEPARD, JOHN
Police services, Oct.
10/01/99
RESERVE PROGRA
CONTR SERVICES
< *>
$100.00*
204567
10/19/99
$207.33
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
Brushes,Performance G
0756 -0
PAVEMENT MARKI
SIGNS & POSTS
5684
10/19/99
$294.89
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
5 Gal Latex Paint
0802 -8
PAVEMENT MARKI
SIGNS & POSTS
5698
10/19/99
$53.57
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
5 gal nylon strainer,
1377 -0
PAVEMENT MARKI
GENERAL SUPPLI
5756
10/19/99
$30.66
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
Paint, 1 gal.
2911 -5
LIFT STATION M
PAINT
9724
< *>
$586.45*
204568
10/19/99
$37.39
SHORT, MICHAEL
Reconstruct 6 radio c
10/11/99
POLICE DEPT. G
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$37.39*
204569
10/19/99
$88.13
SIGNAL SYSTEM
Repair time clock
66910
ARENA BLDG /GRO
CONTR REPAIRS
8050
< *>
$88.13*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
13 -OCT -1999 (14:49) page 26
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT.
PO NUM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
204570
10/19/99
$433.56
SIITARI, MICHAEL
Continuing ed
10/05/99
CIVIL DEFENSE
CONF & SCHOOLS
10/19/99
$16.00
SIITARI, MICHAEL
Meeting expense
10/11/99
POLICE DEPT. G
MEETING EXPENS
< *>
$449.56*
204571
10/19/99
$136.68
SIMS SECURITY
Sims 9/17 -18
9630749
POOL TRACK GRE
PROF SERVICES
CONTRACT
10/19/99
$136.68
SIMS SECURITY
Sims security 9/25
9647394
POOL TRACK GRE
PROF SERVICES
10/19/99
$242.99
SIMS SECURITY.
Sims security 9/18
9647393
POOL TRACK GRE
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$516.35*
204572
10/19/99
$330.00
SMIEJA, GARY
15X22.00 @ Smowplows/
092599
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
< *>
$330.00*
204573
10/19/99
$85.25
SMITH, AMY
Mileage reimbursement
10/11/99
GOLF ADMINISTR
MILEAGE
< *>
$85.25*
204574
10/19/99
$12,115.00
SNELL MECHANICAL
Rooftop units
009275
CONTINGENCIES
EQUIP REPLACEM
4325
< *>
$12,115.00*
204575
10/19/99
$63.90
Southdale Sinclair
Mileage Pd. tow
17064
POLICE DEPT. G
MILEAGE
< *>
$63.90*
204576
10/19/99
$450.25
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
099763
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
10/19/99
$1,861.70
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
099766
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
10/19/99
$61.00
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
099767
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
10/19/99
$34.55
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
99955
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MIX
10/19/99
$706.15
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
99957
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
10/19/99
$3,833.95
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
99959
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
10/19/99
$399.00
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
99.961
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
< *>
$7,346.60*
204577
10/19/99
$997.63
Speedy Print
Scorecards
27425
FRED RICHARDS
PRINTING
6074
< *>
$997.63*
204578
10/19/99
$100.00
St Paul Czechoslovak Fol
Performance 11/7/99
10/04/99
ED ADMINISTRAT
-PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$100.00*
204579
10/19/99
$744.44
ST. CLOUD RESTAURANT SUP
Tables x 3 replace
467421
ARENA BLDG /GRO
GENERAL SUPPLI
8032
< *>
$744.44*
204580
10/19/99
$825.60
Staffing A la Carte
Temp staff
9002
GRILL
SALARIES TEMP
6084
10/19/99
$425.60
Staffing A la Carte
M. Grimm w/e 10/3
9054
GRILL
SALARIES TEMP
< *>
$1,251.20*
204581
10/19/99
$218.33
Star Brite Window Cleani
Window clean in and o
CLEAN 9-
ART CENTER BLD
PROF SERVICES
9022
< *>
$218.33*
204582
10/19/99
$7,738.10
STAR TRIBUNE
Help wanted ads
00342100
CENT SVC GENER
ADVERT PERSONL
10/19/99
$219.00
STAR TRIBUNE
Print ad
09/30/99
FRED RICHARDS
PRINTING
6083
< *>
$7,957.10*
204583
10/19/99
$266.25
Steel Products & Aluminu
Install Doors & Latch'12987
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
5824
< *>
$266.25*
204584
10/19/99
$35.00
Stouten, Jackie
Art program-11/2 /99
10/06/99
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$35.00*
COUNCIL
CHECK k__.STER
13 -OCT -1999 (14:
, page 27
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
204585
10/19/99
$1,152.04
STREICHERS
Repo invest. squad
128530.1
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP REPLACEM
3225
10/19/99
$1,893.33
STREICHERS
Equip. replace. (ACO
129158.1
ANIMAL CONTROL
EQUIP REPLACEM
3023
10/19/99
$1,921.26
STREICHERS
Ammunition
125648.3
POLICE DEPT. G
AMMUNITION
4240
10/19/99
- $549.95
STREICHERS
Uniform (vest)
130858.1
POLICE DEPT. G
UNIF ALLOW
10/19/99
$204.54
STREICHERS
2.Speaker driver
U130628.
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP MAINT
5833
10/19/99
$52.83
STREICHERS
AMMUNITION
126409.1
POLICE DEPT. G
AMMUNITION
3009
10/19/99
$1,623.24
STREICHERS
Equip. repl. (Squad)
131459.1
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP REPLACEM
2640
10/19/99
$105.00
STREICHERS
Equip. replace (Squad
131461.1
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP REPLACEM
2640
10/19/99
$319.50
STREICHERS
Truck vault for Tahoe
132114.1
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP REPLACEM
3029
10/19/99
$105.00
STREICHERS
Labor equip install s
132119.1
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP REPLACEM
2640
< *>
$6,826.79*
204586
10/19/99
$3.99.
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
Clip
85622 CV
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
5908
< *>
$3.99*
204587
10/19/99
$296.60
SUBURBAN PROPANE
L P Fuel
091799
ARENA ICE MAIN
GASOLINE
8048
< *>
$296.60*
204588
10/19/99
$556.00
SULLIVAN, MONICA
Prof. serv.
10/11/99
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$556.00*
204589
10/19/99
$280.95
Sun Newspapers
Pub. hearing notice
261933
ADMINISTRATION
ADVERTISING LE
10/19/99
$59.80
Sun Newspapers
Ord. 99 -7
262003
ADMINISTRATION
ADVERTISING LE
10/19/99
$91.00
Sun Newspapers
99 -10 ordinance
262004
ADMINISTRATION
ADVERTISING LE
10/19/99
$54.60
Sun Newspapers
Publish ord. 99 -3
262002
ADMINISTRATION
ADVERTISING LE
10/19/99
$97.50
Sun Newspapers
ad for bid
264049
ADMINISTRATION
ADVERTISING LE
< *>
$583.85*
204590
10/19/99
$697.69
SUNDE LAND SURVEYING INC
78 St. R.O.W.
25117
TH 169 FRONTAG
CIP
< *>
$697.69*
204591
10/19/99
$67.90
Super America
LP gas -bulk
04109133
GENERAL MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$67:90*
204592
10/19/99
$333.00
Superior Coffee and Food
Coffee
0579683
GRILL
COST OF GD SOL
9042
< *>
$333.00*
204593
10/19/99
$100.00
SWANSON, HAROLD
Police service, Oct.
10/01/99
RESERVE PROGRA
CONTR SERVICES
< *>
$100.00*
204594
10/19/99
$92.19
TAGS
Shoes COGS
16603
PRO SHOP_
COST OF GDS -PR
6081
< *>
$92.19*
204595
10/19/99
$66.03
Tape Company, The
Audio cass. X 100
25538103
POLICE DEPT. G
GENERAL SUPPLI
3030
< *>
$66.03*
204596
10/19/99
$35.00
Taylor's -
Refund skating lesson
10/05/99
EDINB /CL PROG
LESSON PRGM IN
< *>
$35.00*
204597
10/19/99
$600.00
Teller, Dee
Prof. serv.
10/11/99.
ART-CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$600.00*
204598
10/19/99
$404.22
TERMINAL SUPPLY CO
Relays,Shrink Termina
76169 -00
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
5730
10/19/99
$68.52
TERMINAL SUPPLY CO
Duct tape x 24
78377•.:�OO.EQUIPMENT
OPER
GENERAL SUPPLI
5796
< *>
$472.74*
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
13 -OCT -1999 (14:49) page 28
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.----------------------------------------
204599
10/19/99
$100.00
That's Entertainment
Performance 11/4/99
10/04/99.ED
ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$100.00*
204600
10/19/99
$8,500.00
THECO INC
Eq. rental
6608
GENERAL MAINT
CONTR REPAIRS
3392
< *>
$8,500.00*
204601
10/19/99
$286.00
THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP
Beer.COGS',
146170
- GRILL.
CST OF GDS BEE
9043
10/19/99
$20.20
THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI1173912
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
10/19/99
$1,178.40
THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP
-COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
173948
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
10/19/99
$100.00
THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP
Beer COGS :_
146672
GRILL
CST OF GDS BEE
9043
10/19/99
$2,334.35
THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP
COST OF GOODS -SOLD BE
174521
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
10/19/99
$15.95
THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
174522
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS.MIX
< *>
$3,934.90*
204602
10/19/99
$259.15
Timewise
Unit Board
183043
GOLF ADMINISTR
GENERAL SUPPLI
6072
< *>
$259.15*
204603
10/19/99
$4,248.78
TKDA.:.Engineers Architect
Design san. sewer imp
044895
SANITARY SEWER
CIP
10/19/99
$2,031.64
TKDA Engineers Architect
Design san. sewer imp
044896
SANITARY SEWER
CIP
< *>
$6,280.42*
204604
10/19/99
$94.22'•
TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPL
Oxygen,argon, hazmat
274063
EQUIPMENT OPER
WELDING SUPPLI
5742
10/19/99
$79.80
TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPL
Acetylene cylinder re-
411974
PUMP & LIFT ST
GENERAL SUPPLI
5767
< *>
$174.02*
204605
10/19/99
$316.08
TOTAL TOOL
Coffing hoist,install
1730526
PUMP.& LIFT ST
GENERAL SUPPLI
5763
< *>
$316.08*
204606
10/19/99
$341.19
TRACY /TRIPP FUELS
Gas
72223
RICHARDS MAINT
GASOLINE
1217
< *>
$341.19*
204607
10/19/99
$72.25
Trinity Ceramic Supply I
COGS
04593.
ART SUPPLY GIF
COST OF GD SOL
9028
< *>
$72.25*
204608
10/19/99
$324.83 ...
TRUGREEN- CHEMLAWN- MINNET
Contract weed control
MULTIPLE
GENERAL TURF C
PROF SERVICES
1292
< *>
$324.83*
204609
10/19/99
$45.00
Turk, Miroslava
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
10/11/99
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$45.00*
204610
10/19/99
$985.13
Turtle Bay Building Sery
Cleaning, Oct.
991018
POOL TRACK GRE
PROF SERVICES
CONTRACT
< *>
$985.13*
204611
10/19/99
$62.73
TWIN CITY CONCRETE PRODU
Split pallet fee,ceme
161022
PUMP..& LIFT ST
REPAIR PARTS
5793
< *>
$62.73*
204612
10/19/99
$67.89
TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO
Oxygen
504809
FIRE DEPT. GEN
FIRST AID SUPP
9765
< *>
$67.89*
204613
10/19/99
$543.15
TWIN CITY SEED CO.
Seed
2079
MAINT OF COURS
PLANT & TREES
6138
< *>
$543.15*
204614
10/19/99
$235.95
URBAN LAND INSTITUTE
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
10/06/99
ASSESSING
DUES & SUBSCRI
10/19/99
$45.95
URBAN LAND INSTITUTE
Book
10/12/99
FIRE DEPT. GEN
BOOKS & PAMPHL
< *>
$281.90*
COUNCIL
CHECK R�
jTER
13 -OCT -1999 (14: - -_,
page 29
HECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
204615
10/19/99
$251.97
US Filter Distribution G
Copper water line
5717200
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPLI
5715
< *>
$251.97*
204616
10/19/99
$4,977.65
US FOODSERVICES INC
COST OF GOODS SOLD
114300 9
GRILL
COST OF GD SOL
10/19/99
$773.65
US FOODSERVICES,INC
CLEANING SUPPLIES
114300 9
GRILL
CLEANING SUPPL
10/19/99
$1,562.71
US FOODSERVICES INC
Menu boards
114300 9
GRILL
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$7,314.01*
204617
10/19/99
$55.87
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
Telephone
09/25/99
PUMP & LIFT ST
TELEPHONE
10/19/99
$54.81
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
Telephone
61292704
DARE
TELEPHONE
10/19/99
$2,332.71
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
Telephone
61292788
CENT SVC GENER
TELEPHONE
10/19/99
$29.21
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
Telephone
61294113
ARENA BLDG /GRO
TELEPHONE
< *>
$2,472.60*
204618
16/19/99
$1,230.00
VINTAGE ONE WINES
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
3450
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
< *>
$1,230.00*
204619
10/19/99
$100.00
WALBRIDGE, DAVID
Performance 11/18/99
10/04/99
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$100.00*
204620
10/19/99
$100.52
WALSER FORD
Sensor assy. frt. x3.
7765b FO
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
5847
< *>
$100.52*
204621
10/19/99
$100.00
WALSH, WILLIAM
Police services, Oct.
10/01/99
RESERVE PROGRA
CONTR SERVICES
< *>
$100.00*
204622
10/19/99
$978.00
Walvatne Industries Sery
Battery backup for co
1589
VERNON OCCUPAN
GENERAL SUPPLI
4366
< *>
$978.00*
204623
10/19/99
$612.16
WARNING LITES
Neon safety vests x 2
32846
GENERAL MAINT
SAFETY EQUIPME
5789
< *>
$612.16*
204624
10/19/99
$47.62
Waterloo, Pat
Mileage reimb. 153.6
10/05/99
GOLF ADMINISTR
MILEAGE
< *>
$47.62*
204625
10/19/99
$335.96
WEST WELD SUPPLY CO.
Pipe Cap,Pipe P1ub,Cu
26298
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
5748
10/19/99
$291.32
WEST WELD,SUPPLY CO.
Tool bits,misc. parts
26458
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
5854
< *>
$627.28*
204626
10/19/99
$940.00
WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT
Uncovered Tops of Tan
0002089-
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
5755
10/19/99
$984.50
WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT
Remove /disp. evacuato
0002203-
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
5753
< *>
$1,924.50*
204627
10/19/99
$100.00
Williams, Geoff.
Performance 11/11/99 - „_10/04/99
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$100.00*
204628
10/19/99
- $70.31
WINE COMPANY, THE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
026784
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
10/19/99
$571.45
WINE COMPANY, THE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
027306
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
10/19/99
$570.65
!WINE COMPANY, THE,.
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
027608
VERNON.SELLING.CST
OF GD WINE
10/19/99
$1,547.75
WINE - :COMPANY, THE
COST OF .GOODS SOLD WI
027609
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
10/19/99
$126.00
WINE COMPANY, THE
COST;OF GOODS SOLD BE
027610
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
10/19/99
$1,419.84
WINE COMPANY, THE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
027611
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
10/19/99
$173.00
WINE COMPANY, THE.
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
027985
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
10/19/99
$105.00
WINE COMPANY, THE
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
028011
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
10/19/99
$51.00
WINE COMPANY, THE
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
028012
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
0
13 -OCT -1999
(14.:49) page 30
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
- - - --
DESCRIPTION
- - -
- --
INVOICE
-----
PROGRAM
- - - - -- --- - -
- - --
OBJECT PO NUM
-- - - - -
204628
10/19/99
-----------------------------
$613.43
WINE COMPANY, THE
-
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
028061
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD
WINE
10/19/99
$1,401.50
WINE COMPANY,.THE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
028063
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD
WINE
< *>
$6,509.31*
204629
10/19/99
$510.40
WINE MERCHANTS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
21781
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD
WINE
10/19/99
$680.50
WINE MERCHANTS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
21782
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD
WINE
10/19/99
$352.10
WINE MERCHANTS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
21783
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD
WINE
10/19/99
$601.35
WINE MERCHANTS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
22017
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD
WINE
10/19/99
$1,182.20
WINE MERCHANTS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
22018
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD
WINE
10/19/99
$79.15
WINE MERCHANTS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
22019
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD
WINE
< *>
$3,405.70*
204630
10/19/99
$489.90
WORLD CLASS WINES
INC
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
85656
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD
WINE
10/19/99
$187.90
WORLD CLASS WINES
INC
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
85657
YORK SELLING
CST
OF GD
WINE
10/19/99
$1,167.00
WORLD CLASS WINES
INC
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
85784
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD
WINE
10/19/99
$340.00
WORLD CLASS WINES
INC
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD.WI
86010
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF GD
WINE
10/19/99
$803.00
WORLD CLASS WINES
INC
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
86011
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF GD
WINE
< *>
$2,987.80*
204631
10/19/99
$239.59
WRIGHT LINE
:File
Dividers
3356310
FIRE:DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI 3546
< *>
$239.59*
204632
10/19/99
$100.00
WROBLESKI, HENRY
Police
services, Oct.
10 /01/99
RESERVE PROGRA
CONTR SERVICES
< *>
$100.00*
204633
10/19/99
$300.74
XEROX CORPORATION,
PUBLI
Copy
usage
sept
07110148
POLICE DEPT. G
SVC
CONTR
EQUI
< *>
$300.74*
204634
10/19/99
$407.56
Xerox Corporation
Copier
for aug
07057362
POLICE DEPT. G
SVC
CONTR
EQUI
< *>
$407.56*
204635
10/19/99
$62.38
ZIEGLER INC
Pump,
Gasket
P0000253
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES 5829
< *>
$62.38*
$1,061,542.08*
0
COUNCIL CHECARY 40 13 -OCT -1999 ( ) page 1
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FUND
#
10
GENERAL FUND
$500,005.87
FUND
#
12
COMMUNICATIONS
$24,705.54
FUND
#
15
WORKING CAPITAL
$5,793.17
FUND
#
23
ART CENTER
$7,530.62
FUND
#
25
GOLF DOME FUND
$9,362.56
FUND
#
26
SWIMMING POOL FUND
$229.47
FUND
#
27
GOLF COURSE FUND
$22,115.92
FUND
#
28
ICE ARENA FUND
$20,836.08
FUND
#
30
EDINBOROUGH /CENTENNIAL LAK
$18,923.92
FUND
#
40
UTILITY FUND
$37,042.25
FUND
#
41
STORM SEWER UTILITY FUND
$3,617.04
FUND
#
42
RECYCLING PROGRAM
$35,092.44
FUND
#
50
LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND
$218,503.07
FUND
#
60
CONSTRUCTION FUND
$156,473.14
FUND
#
61
PARK BOND FUND
$1,310.99
$1,061,542.08*
9-
COUNCIL
CHECK-- :2k,,�iSTER
06 -OCT -1999 (1, ) page 1
CHECK NO
CHECK DT
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
- - -- OBJECT- - - - -PO NUM.
194377
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
09/03/99
$203,000.00
CITY OF EDINA
Payroll
transfer
090399
LIQUOR PROG
CASH
09/03/99
- $203,000.00
CITY OF EDINA
payroll
transfer
090399
LIQUOR PROG
CASH
< *>
$0.00*
194378
09/17/99
- $260,000.00
CITY OF EDINA
Payroll
transfer
091799
LIQUOR PROG
CASH
09/17/99
$260,000.00
CITY OF EDINA
payroll
transfer
091799
LIQUOR PROG
CASH
< *>
$0.00*
194379
09/01/99
$4,530.50
AON RISK
SERVICES INC
0
Ambulance
sery liabil
249564
CENT SVC GENER
INSURANCE
09/01/99
$10,592.00
AON RISK
SERVICES INC
0
Commercial
pkg
249690
CENT SVC GENER
INSURANCE
04/01/99
$3,473.00
AON RISK
SERVICES INC
0
Commercial
pkg
249691
CENT SVC GENER
INSURANCE
09/01/99
$3,473.00
AON RISK
SERVICES INC
0
Commercial
pkg
250999
CENT SVC GENER
INSURANCE
< *>
$22,068.50*
194380
09/17/99
$32,840.53
NORTHERN
STATES
POWER
C
LIGHT &
POWER
091599
ST LIGHTING RE
LIGHT & POWER
09/17/99
$312.81
NORTHERN
STATES
POWER
C
LIGHT &
POWER
091599
ST LIGHTING OR
LIGHT & POWER
09/17/99
$3,606.03
NORTHERN
STATES
POWER
C
LIGHT &
POWER
091599
TRAFFIC SIGNAL
LIGHT & POWER
09/17/99
$2,664.94
NORTHERN
STATES
POWER
C
LIGHT &
POWER
091599
PARKING RAMP
LIGHT & POWER
09/17/99
$644.29
NORTHERN
STATES
POWER
C
LIGHT &
POWER
091599
FIRE DEPT. GEN
LIGHT & POWER
09/17/99
$119.57
NORTHERN
STATES
POWER
C
LIGHT &
POWER
091599
YORK FIRE STAT
LIGHT & POWER
09/17/99
$15.08
NORTHERN
STATES
POWER
C
LIGHT &
POWER
091599
CIVIL DEFENSE
LIGHT & POWER
09/17/99
$2,842.01
NORTHERN
STATES
POWER
C
LIGHT &
POWER
091599
CITY HALL GENE
LIGHT & POWER
09/17/99
$3,217.03
NORTHERN
STATES
POWER
C
LIGHT &
POWER
091599
PW BUILDING
LIGHT & POWER
09/17/99
$8,478.66
NORTHERN
STATES
POWER
C
LIGHT &
POWER
091599
BUILDING MAINT
LIGHT & POWER
09/17/99
$5,379.43
NORTHERN
STATES
POWER
C
LIGHT &
POWER
091599
CLUB HOUSE
LIGHT & POWER
09/17/99
$696.51
NORTHERN'
STATES
POWER
C
LIGHT &
POWER
091599
MAINT OF COURS
LIGHT & POWER
09/17/99
$668.08
NORTHERN
STATES
POWER
C
LIGHT &
POWER
091599
FRED RICHARDS
LIGHT & POWER
09/17/99
$3,082.05
NORTHERN
STATES
POWER
C
LIGHT &
POWER
091599
POOL OPERATION
LIGHT & POWER
09/17/99
$19,673.16
NORTHERN
STATES
POWER
C
LIGHT &
POWER
091599
ARENA BLDG /GRO
LIGHT & POWER
09/17/99
$11,932.28
NORTHERN
STATES
POWER
C
LIGHT &
POWER
091599
POOL TRACK GRE
LIGHT & POWER
09/17/99
- $927.00
NORTHERN
STATES
POWER
C
LIGHT &
POWER
091599
CENTENNIAL LAK
LIGHT & POWER
09/17/99
$854.05
NORTHERN
STATES
POWER
C
LIGHT &
POWER
091599
PUMP & LIFT ST
LIGHT & POWER
09/17/99
$32,456.20
NORTHERN
STATES
POWER
C
LIGHT &
POWER
091599
DISTRIBUTION
LIGHT & POWER
09/17/99
$37.68
NORTHERN
STATES
POWER
C
LIGHT &
POWER
091599
TANKS TOWERS &
LIGHT & POWER
09/17/99
$919.11
NORTHERN
STATES
POWER
C
LIGHT &
POWER
091599
50TH ST OCCUPA
LIGHT & POWER
09/17/99
$1,470.18
NORTHERN
STATES
POWER
C
LIGHT &
POWER
091599
YORK OCCUPANCY
LIGHT & POWER
09/17/99
$865.08
NORTHERN
STATES
POWER
C
LIGHT &
POWER
091599
VERNON OCCUPAN
LIGHT & POWER
09/17/99
- $1,435.08
NORTHERN
STATES
POWER
C
LIGHT &
POWER
091599
GENERAL STORM
LIGHT & POWER
09/17/99
- $1,091.52
NORTHERN
STATES
POWER
C
LIGHT &
POWER
091599
PONDS & LAKES
LIGHT & POWER
09/17/99
$222.29
NORTHERN
STATES
POWER
C
LIGHT &
POWER
091599
AQUATIC WEEDS
LIGHT & POWER
< *>
$129,543.45*
203450
09/07/99
$19.62
PERA
P.E.R.A.
PAYABLE
9799
GENERAL FD PRO-
P.E.R.A. PAYAB
< *>
$19.62*
203451
09/07/99
$60,173.72
PERA
P.E.R.A. PAYABLE
090799
GENERAL FD PRO
P.E.R.A. PAYAB
< *>
$60,173.72*
203453'
09/07/99
- $73.50
QUALITY
WINE
COST OF
GOODS SOLD WI
744888
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
09/07/99
$35.00
QUALITY
WINE
COST OF
GOODS SOLD LI
746228
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQU
09/07/99
- $601.86
QUALITY
WINE
COST OF
GOODS SOLD LI
746993
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
09/07/99
$4,191.67
QUALITY
WINE
COST OF
GOODS SOLD LI
7477.67
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU_.
09/07/99
- $82.47
QUALITY
WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
7477.67
VERNON SELLING
TRADE DISCOUNT
09/07/99
$2,427.32
QUALITY
WINE
COST OF
GOODS SOLD WI
747889
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
09/07/99
- $24.06
QUALITY
WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
747889
YORK SELLING
TRADE DISCOUNT
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
WINE
COMPANY,
THE
COST
OF
GOODS
06 -OCT- 1999.(18:48) page 2
CHECK NO
CHECK DT
CHECK AMOUNT
$539.25
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
THE
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT. PO NUM.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------7-------------
203453
09/07/99
$2,786.14
QUALITY
WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
LI
747890
50TH ST SELLIN
CST-OF GD LIQU
$866.25
09/07/99
- $27.62
QUALITY
WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS -
WINE
747890
50TH ST SELLIN
TRADE DISCOUNT
OF
09/07/99
$5,647.62
QUALITY
WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI
747904
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
COST
09/07/99
7$55.94
QUALITY
WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
09/07/99
747904
VERNON SELLING
TRADE DISCOUNT
THE
09/07/99
$263.88
QUALITY
WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
LI
748124
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
COMPANY,
09/07/99
-$5.23
QUALITY
WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
,WI
748124
VERNON SELLING
TRADE DISCOUNT
WINE
09/07/99
$4,592.39
QUALITY
WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
LI
748220
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
$639.80
09/07/99
- $91.22
QUALITY
WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
GOODS
748220
YORK SELLING
TRADE DISCOUNT
09/07/99
09/07/99
$2,656:87
QUALITY
WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
LI
748221
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQU
022794
09/07/99
- $52.81
QUALITY
WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
COST
748221
50TH ST SELLIN
TRADE DISCOUNT
WI
09/07/99
$266.34
QUALITY
WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI
748365
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
SOLD
09/07/99
-$2.66
QUALITY
WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
COMPANY,
748365
VERNON SELLING
TRADE DISCOUNT
GOODS
09/07/99
$94.95
QUALITY
WINE
COST--OF GOODS .SOLD
WI
748576
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
OF
09/07/99
-$0.95
QUALITY
WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS,
$5,242.08*
VERNON SELLING
TRADE DISCOUNT
< *>
$21,943.86*
203454
09/07/99
$737.63
RICHFIELD TRANSMISSION
INSTALL NEW ECM
010610
EQUIPMENT OPER
GENERAL SUPPLI 5192
< *>
$737.63*
203456 09/07/99
$276.05
WINE
COMPANY,
THE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
022389
09/07/99
$539.25
WINE
COMPANY,
THE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
022390
09/07/99
$70.95
WINE
COMPANY,
THE
COST
OF-GOODS
$866.25
SOLD
BE
022395
09/07/99
$717.60
WINE
COMPANY,
THE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
022396
09/07/99
$357.40
WINE
COMPANY,
THE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
022433
09/07/99
$128.00
WINE.
COMPANY,
THE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI-022628
QUALITY
09/07/99
$533.70
WINE
COMPANY,
THE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
,WI
022774
09/07/99
$639.80
WINE
COMPANY,
THE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
022775
09/07/99
$639.80
WINE
COMPANY,
THE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
022777
09/07/99
$118.98
WINE
COMPANY,
THE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
022794
09/07/99
$354.85
WINE
COMPANY,
THE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
022796
09/07/99
$176.95
WINE
COMPANY,
THE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
022808
09/07/99
$64.00
WINE
COMPANY,
THE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
022815
09/07/99
$624.75
WINE
COMPANY,
THE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD.WI
023102
< *>
$5,242.08*
50TH ST SELLIN
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK. SELLING
50TH ST SELLIN
50TH ST SELLIN
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
203457 09/13/99 $70.00 Association of Metropol Reg. Mtg /D.Maetzold & 091399 CITY COUNCIL
< *> $70.00*
203459 09/13/99
$3,859:70
QUALITY.WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI
749740 -0
09/13/99
- $38.36
QUALITY
WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
749740 -0
09/13/99
$4,930.41
QUALITY
WINE,
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI
749748 -0
09/13/99
- $48.88
QUALITY
WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
749748 -0
09/13/99
$866.25
QUALITY
WINE
COST-OF GOODS SOLD
WI
749756 -0
09/13/99
-$8.64
QUALITY
WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
749756 -0
09/13/99
$4,006.14
QUALITY
WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
LI
749985 -0
09/13/99
- $79.66
QUALITY
WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
749985 -0
09/13/99
$1,966.34
QUALITY
WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
LI
749987 -0
09/13/99
- $39.10
QUALITY
WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
749987 -0
09/13/99
$3,254.18
QUALITY
WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
LI
749996 -0
09/13/99
- $64.63
QUALITY
WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
749996 -0
09/13/99
$522.44
QUALITY
WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
LI
751116 -0
09/13/99
- $10.45
QUALITY
WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
751116 -0
< *>
$19,115.74*
203460 09/13/99 $60.00 STATE TREASURER
c
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
VERNON SELLING
YORK SELLING
50TH ST SELLIN
YORK SELLING -
YORK SELLING
YORK SELLING -
YORK SELLING
'99 Fall Sem.Kirchman 090999 INSPECTIONS
CST OF GD WINE
CST OF GD WINE
CST OF GDS BEE
CST OF GD WINE
CST OF GD WINE
CST OF GD WINE
CST OF GD, WINE
CST OF GD WINE
CST OF GD WINE
CST OF GD WINE
CST OF GD WINE
CST OF GD WINE
CST OF GD WINE
CST OF GD WINE
MEETING'EXPENS
CST OF GD WINE
TRADE DISCOUNT
CST OF GD WINE
TRADE DISCOUNT
CST.OF GD WINE
TRADE DISCOUNT
CST OF GD LIQU
TRADE DISCOUNT
CST OF GD LIQU
TRADE DISCOUNT
CST OF GD LIQU
TRADE DISCOUNT
CST OF GD LIQU
TRADE DISCOUNT
CONF & SCHOOJ ^
l
COUNCIL
CHECK xEGISTER
1
-
06 -OCT -1999 (1-48) page 3
CHECK NO
CHECK DT
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT PO NUM.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------:-----------------------
< *>
$60.00*
203461
09/13/99
$122.26
U S BANCORP
ans.machine,helmet su
48334960
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$122.26*
203462
09/13/99
$45.50
U S BANCORP
Meeting Expenses
48334960
ADMINISTRATION
MEETING EXPENS
< *>
$45.50*
203463
09/13/99
$13.00
U S BANCORP
Keystroke Test
66239
FINANCE
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$13.00*
203464
09/13/99
$509.70
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE CO
basic life / G.Hughs
091099
CENT SVC GENER
HOSPITALIZATIO
< *>
$509.70*
203837
09/29/99
$82.80
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE CO
Basic AD & D
092899
CENT SVC GENER
HOSPITALIZATIO
< *>
$82.80*
203838
09/29/99
$428.60
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE CO
Basic life / G.Hughes
092999
CENT SVC GENER
HOSPITALIZATIO
< *>
$428.60*
203839
09/29/99
$1,000.00
POSTMASTER
Postage "About Town"
092999
COMMUNICATIONS
MAG /NEWSLET EX
< *>
$1,000.00*
203862
09/20/99
$250,000.00
HRA /CITY OF EDINA
HRA Advance
091499
GENERAL FD PRO
DUE FROM HRA
< *>
$250,000.00*
203863
09/20/99
$60,799.63
PERA
Cont PERA PP /E 9 -14 -9
092099
GENERAL FD PRO
P.E.R.A. PAYAB
< *>
$60,799.63*
203864
09/20/99
$19.62
PERA
Cont.PERA PP /E 9 -14 -9
092099
GENERAL FD PRO
P.E.R.A. PAYAB
< *>
$19.62*
203866
09/20/99
- $69.95
QUALITY WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
747816 -0
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
09/20/99
$4,542.71
QUALITY WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI
752007 -0
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
09/20/99
- $90.37
QUALITY WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
752007 -0
VERNON SELLING
TRADE DISCOUNT
09/20/99
$362.50
QUALITY WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI
752018 -0
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
09/20/99
-$7.20
QUALITY WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
752018 -0
VERNON SELLING
TRADE:DISCOUNT
09/20/99
$122.50
QUALITY WINE
COST.OF.GOODS SOLD WI
752194 -0
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
09/20/99
-$1.21
QUALITY WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
752194 -0
YORK SELLING
TRADE DISCOUNT
09/20/99
$1,965.94
QUALITY WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
752210 -0
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
09/20/99
- $19.50
QUALITY WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
752210 -0
50TH ST SELLIN
TRADE DISCOUNT
09/20/99
$2,023.30
QUALITY WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
752211 -0
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
09/20/99
- $20.05
QUALITY WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
752211 -0
YORK SELLING
TRADE DISCOUNT
09/20/99
$2,543.25
QUALITY WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
752212 -0
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
09/20/99
- $25.19
QUALITY WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
752212 -0
VERNON.SELLING
TRADE DISCOUNT
09/20/99
$2,859.13
QUALITY WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI
752229 -0
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD LIQU
09/20/99
- $56.90
QUALITY WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
752229 -0
50TH ST SELLIN
TRADE DISCOUNT
09/20/99
$2,922.36
QUALITY WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI
752237 -0
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
09/20/99
- $58.13
QUALITY WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
752237 70
YORK SELLING
TRADE DISCOUNT
09/20/99
$325.50
QUALITY WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
752286 -0
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
09/20/99
-$3.24
QUALITY WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
752286 -0
YORK SELLING
TRADE DISCOUNT
09/20/99
- $91.19
QUALITY WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
752701 -0
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
< *>
$17,224.26*
203867
09/20/99
$693.87
Welsh Companies Inc
Maint Serv. Oct
100199
YORK OCCUPANCY
PROF SERVICES
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
06 -OCT -1999 (18:48) page
CHECK NO
CHECK DT
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM.
- -` *�- -
$693.87*
203869
09/27/99
-$8.29
QUALITY
WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI
751068 -0
VERNON.SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
09/27/99
- $276.50
QUALITY
WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI
751186 -0
YORK SELLING
CST. OF GD WINE
09/27/99
- $39.70
QUALITY
WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI
752104 -0
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
09/27/99
- $97.69
QUALITY
WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
LI
753399 -0
VERNON.SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
09/27/99
$3,793.58
QUALITY
WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI
754088 -0
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
09/27/99
- $37.57
QUALITY
WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
754088 -0
YORK SELLING
TRADE DISCOUNT
09/27/99
$2,602.12
QUALITY
WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI
754277 -0
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
09/27/99
- $25.78
QUALITY
WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
754277 -0
50TH ST SELLIN
TRADE DISCOUNT
09/27/99
$2,565.60
QUALITY
WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
LI
754328 -0
VERNON.SELLING
CST'OF GD LIQU
09/27/99
- $51.00
QUALITY
WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
754328 -0
VERNON.SELLING
TRADE DISCOUNT
09/27/99
$4,861.48
QUALITY
WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
LI
754473 -0
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD'LIQU
09/27/99
- $96.73
QUALITY
WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
754473 -0
YORK SELLING
TRADE DISCOUNT.
09/27/99
- $35.50
QUALITY
WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
754474 -0
50TH ST SELLIN
TRADE..DISCOUNT
09/27/99
$1,786.92
QUALITY
WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
LI
754474 -0
50TH ST SELLIN
CST .OF GD LIQU
09/27/99
- $39.62
QUALITY
WINE
TRADE DISCOUNTS
754673 -0
VERNON SELLING
TRADE.DISCOUNT
09/27/99
$4,003.10
QUALITY
WINE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
WI
754673 -0
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
< *>
$18,904.42*
203870 09/27/99
$312.00 Reimer, Mark
$312.00*
$609,130.26*
softball umpire /reiss 083099 EDINA ATHLETIC CONTR SERVICES REISSUE
I
COUNCIL CHECk dUMMARY FOR HAND CHECKS
i
21- OCT-1999 page 1
-----------------------
FUND 0
10
------- ----- - - - - --
GENERAL FUND
-
$449,891.53
FUND b
12
COMMUNICATIONS
$1,000.00
FUND 0
15
WORKING CAPITAL
$534.29
FUND A
26
SWIMMING POOL FUND
$3,082.05
FUND #
27
GOLF COURSE FUND
$6,744.02
FUND M
28
ICE ARENA FUND
$19,673.16
FUND b
30
EDINBOROUGH /CENTENNIAL LAK
$11,005.28
FUND b
40
UTILITY FUND
$33,347.93
FUND
41
STORM SEWER UTILITY FUND
- $2,526.60
FUND N
50
LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND
$86,378.60
$609,130.26+
DON AND LORI MCQUARRIE
a-uti
6625 MOH AW I TRAIL
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55432
(612) 941 -5122
l
9 lb
6705 Southdale Road
Edina, MN 55435
October 5, 1999
Dear Council Members,
I am writing- this letter to express have - .deeply concerned i and others in- myneighborbood
have become about the speeds at which traffic seems to be moving on our street. l
The posted- speed limit is- 30- miles- per-hour; howzver, it- is- .not uncommon-lo see
motorists traveling at speeds of 35, 40, and even 45 miles per hour — especially as rush
hour approaches. On our street, within the- distance of 100 yards, live 14 children; all are
under the age of 10. The average age is about four years old. It is truly unacceptable for
these .kinds-of .speeds to persistin_a_residentia.l area where_a cr. n� g_caLCan cone vably
come within a few feet of a four - year -old child. --
Police, afficersIhave_spakeato abouttheissueof speeding-admit thatitis difficult to
catch drivers who are traveling above the posted speeds in this area. Furthermore, ithas
been admitted (by a police - officer )- that- speeding-tickets _are-not likely to be given to
someone driving five miles above the speed limit because it is so commonly done;
therefore, the unofficiaLspeed_limit_i . my neighborhood-is, actually 35 miles per hour.
l
In light of this unofficially sanctioned toleration of speeding, I have often wondered-why
the_speed.limit in this neighborhood _and_others-is- not_20- miles -per hour. In -other
communities where I have lived, 20 miles per hour is the posted speed limit, particularly
in- areas_located_within walking distance of a_ school What would be the_procedur-e for
requesting that the speed limit in this neighborhood change from 30 to 20 miles per-hour?
I am surethat this- would-be a_.difficult. change -to make, but-Lam very - serious about
seeing speeds in this area reduced. -
Y ion in this natter is-greatly appreciated.
Regards,
r���aj'
Pao Selske
EDINA PARK BOARD
7:00 P.M. PARK TOUR
8:00 P.M. PARK BOARD MEETING
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
AUGUST 11, 1999
MEMBERS PRESENT: Andrew Finsness, George Klus, Chuck Mooty, Linda Presthus,
Karla Sitek, Tom White, David Fredlund, Floyd Grabiel, Bill
Jenkins
MEMBERS ABSENT: Andrew Herring, John Murrin
STAFF PRESENT: John Keprios, Ed MacHolda, Janet Canton, Vince Cockriel
I. PARK BOARD TOUR
The Edina Park Board went on a tour of the following parks:
Todd Park, Garden Park, Walnut Ridge Park, Van Valkenburg Park, Lewis Park and
Arden Park.
II. APPROVAL OF THE TUESDAY JUNE 8 1999 PARK BOARD MINUTES
George Klus MOVED TO APPROVE THE JUNE 8, 1999 PARK BOARD MINUTES.
Bill Jenkins SECONDED THE MOTION. MINUTES APPROVED.
III. LEWIS PARK BANDY RINK/SOCCER FIELD
Mr. Keprios stated that as his report indicated the architects study came in with a price
tag a little higher than what was expected. He noted that it would cost $150,000 and the
soccer field would be out of play for an entire year. He pointed out that we could save
$20,000 to $30,000 by seeding and not sodding. However, the right way would be to sod
it and have it playable a lot sooner. Mr. Keprios commented this was a good
recommendation from the Park Board to hire a professional who does this for a living and
to show what the true costs would be to make it a quality playing field. Mr. Keprios
stated that as Mr. MacHolda pointed out at the site the field is flat and will always be wet
even though drain tile has been installed because it's a boggy area. It was noted that short
of changing the grade and putting in the right drainage it will never be a quality playing
field.
Mr._Keprios_ indicated _that_he_was_also_asked_to_ pursue_ other. sources-of financing_that
might be available to us. He noted that he received the study from the architect the same
day he completed. the staff report and therefore did not know what financing we would
need. However, Mr. MacHolda has stated in the past that he feels the Soccer and
Football Associations would be able to donate at least half of it. Mr. Jenkins asked how
many fields would be gained out of this to which Mr. MacHolda replied one, but in
essence it would be two because the field has lights.
Mr. Keprios stated that although it looks like half of the money would be from donations
we would still be short the other half. Therefore, he asked what direction the Park Board
would like to go. Mr. Klus asked what are the options because if we don't have the
money there really is no reason to get donations when we can't finish it. Mr. Keprios
replied that is why he made the recommendation he did, there are not many options. He
stated that if the Park Board feels very strongly that we should no longer support bandy,
the only thing gained would be better quality ice at another location(s).
Mr. Mooty asked Mr. Keprios if it would be possible to go forward with his proposal and
try to monitor the fees that are generated by bandy and/or the users of that rink and
compare that to the incremental cost. Then as we try to create some dollars and support
for this next year we will have some greater justification of the economics of why we are
trying to do this and the rationale for it. Mr. Mooty noted that if we could really try to
analyze what the costs are this year it would be very helpful.
Mr. Klus asked if there are cost savings by not having bandy this year, where does that
money go. Mr. Keprios replied that money wouldn't be saved, however, it would create
better quality ice at other facilities as well as possibly extend the rink season. Ms.
Presthus asked how much revenue does bandy take in . Mr. -MacHolda replied that we
charged them $60.00 an hour in which they had approximately 45 hours last year.
Mr. Mooty asked if there is any way that the bandy rink could be monitored to see how
much is for recreational purposes only. He noted that to him personally he doesn't see
any reason to keep it open just for bandy. The question really is are people getting a lot
more utilization out the rink than what we think. Mr. Finsness asked if the smaller rink is
still being flooded in which it was noted yes. Mr. Keprios commented that the reason the
small rink is flooded is because the bandy rink is scheduled quite heavily and for
someone who doesn't play hockey they need a rink to go to. Mr. Mooty asked how can it
be scheduled that heavily when it's only being used approximately 45 hours. Mr. -
MacHolda replied that it is usually scheduled Monday through Thursday evenings
starting at 6:00 p.m. until close. Therefore, there is some general skating before that time.
On Saturday and Sundays bandy is scheduled from approximately 9:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.
Mr. Mooty asked how come we only have billable 40 some hours if that's the case. Mr.
MacHolda replied that because of the weather this past year, the season was very short and
really was not a good season to compare it to.
Mr. Klus asked if bandy will be using the rink this winter. Mr. Keprios replied that as
soon as Mr. Herring brought this issue to his attention he gave a heads up to the bandy
2
teams that they may not have a facility this year. Mr. Klus asked-when does the bandy
organization need to know this to which Mr. Keprios replied it can be delayed right up
until December when the ice is starting to be made.
Mr. White asked if we did have the financing to build the soccer field we wouldn't start
until next spring, is that correct. Mr. Cockriel commented that if we had the financing we
would start tomorrow. Mr. Klus asked for a better understanding of what we would gain
in our park system if we didn't have bandy, what would you like to see enhanced that we
haven't had in past winters. Mr. Cockriel indicated that right now there are two sites,
Strachauer and York Park, where crews are not able to spend a lot of time on them.
Therefore, those two rinks could get a lot more attention and have better quality ice. Mr.
Klus asked if those two rinks are scheduled to which Mr. MacHolda replied that
Strachauer is a scheduled rink. Mr. Keprios added that the only rink in which he received
complaints this past winter was Strachauer Park.
Ms. Sitek asked how many complaints will you get from Bandy people. Mr. Keprios
replied that he has put the word out on what may be happening and he hasn't received
one phone call. He noted that at least 90% of the bandy players are non - residents and
commented that their numbers are going down.
Mr. Jenkins indicated that we obviously cannot do the soccer field right now because we
don't have the funds. Therefore, the question is do we want to eliminate bandy this year
or do we want to continue with it. Mr. Jenkins asked if we do continue with bandy is it
too late to raise their rates. Mr. Keprios replied that his recommendation would be that
since we don't have the money to build the soccer field at this time to keep bandy one
more .year and raise their fee and let them know that this will be their last year.
Mr. White indicated that it is his understanding that Roseville charges $240.00 an hour
and we charge $60.00. Mr. MacHolda replied that the bandy players complain that
$60.00 is too high because we don't have a sweeper and we don't have lines right away.
Mr. White noted that he thinks we should be charging at least $120.00 an hour. Mr.
Mooty asked if we do that are we going to, lose the bandy players and end up maintaining
a big sheet of ice with no one using it. Mr. MacHolda stated that the bandy players have
nowhere else to go.
Mr. Grabiel commented that he doesn't feel this is really a money issue, it's an issue of
whether we want to provide a program or not.
Mr. Klus indicated that his recommendation would be that we keep the sheet of ice for
bandy this year and keep the program and leave, it up to staff as to whether there should
be a raise in.the fee structure. Because we will not be starting the soccer fields at this
time he sees no reason to take the bandy sheet of ice away because there are a lot of
families in the community who use it. Mr. KLUS MOVED TO RECOMMEND THAT
WE KEEP THE BANDY RINK AS IT IS AND LET STAFF DECIDE IF THERE
SHOULD BE AN INCREASE IN FEES.
Mr. White indicated that it was mentioned that. some of the soccer games had to be
canceled because the fields weren't playable and asked if that was in any way related to
the bandy sheet of ice. Mr. MacHolda replied no. 'Mr. Keprios added that the twist to
that is if we had a playable field where the bandy field is we could rest our fields and
renovate them. That is part of the problem, so in a way, it is related.
Linda Presthus SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Mr. Klus suggested that this topic again be brought up at the end of the bandy season so
we can discuss whether or not we want.to have bandy next year.
Mr. Mooty noted we should also try to get a sense from the people that if we had the
ability to do another soccer field would that be supported. Also, we should start working
with the Soccer and Football Associations and any other group that may have an interest
in trying to get something there. 'Therefore, we will know what our potential is for
raising dollars.
IV. USE OF ETHNIC. RELIGIOUS OR RACIAL NAMES OR SYMBOLS POLICY
Mr. Keprios pointed out that as his staff report indicates some of the major league names
we have used for our Coach Pitch program have been offensive to some people. He noted
that he also made a typo in his staff report and it should read the "Edina Human Relations
Commission" and not the "Edina Human Rights Commission ". Mr. Keprios explained
the chairman of the Human Relations Commission called him and stated that this is a
very serious issue in their mind and they would like for us to address this issue. He noted
that his response was that as Director of the Edina Park and Recreation Department he
will not allow any of the teams he, has control over to use those few offensive major
league names. However, the bigger issue is the athletic associations. Do we want to
come up with a policy similar to what Minneapolis did where we can fall back on that
states we will not use names and symbols that are offensive to certain races and religions
and if they do then they will not be able to use our fields. Mr. Keprios pointed out that
what it comes down to is do we want to come up with a policy. Mr. Mooty commented
that he thinks Minneapolis has a good policy that is appropriate.
Mr. Klus stated that he feels this decision should be left up to the athletic associations and
this should not be a Park Board policy. Mr. Finsness commented that he thinks it's so
easy to just stay away from those few names that some people are offended by. Mr. Klus
indicated that those few names grow every year, it gets old and he doesn't have a lot of
empathy for the whole issue.
Mr. Grabiel asked what is the relationship between the Park Board and these groups. Mr.
Keprios replied that wexecognize certain athletic associations that are independently
incorporated in which we give them first priority access to our fields. These associations
pay $6.00 per participant to play on these fields and ice rinks. That is basically the extent
of the relationship. Mr. White asked if we would tell these associations we don't care
what names you adopt but if you adopt a name that might be considered offensive you are
4
not going to be able to use our facilities. Mr. Keprios pointed out that in the 22 years he
has been with the city there has been one incident in which the EGAA wanted to do pull
tabs for a fundraiser and were told if they did they would no longer receive services from
the city. Mr. Grabiel indicated that he agrees with Mr. Klus that the decision should be
left up to the athletic associations. Mr. Keprios used as an example that if a football team
were named the Washington Redskins and someone took offense to it and brought it
before the Human Relations Commission they would pass that on to the Park Board. Mr.
Grabiel commented that we would say we don't have a policy on that, it is the Human
Relations Commissions job. Mr. White pointed out that they would then say we should
have had a policy and the City of Edina ends up paying a lot of money. He stated that he
doesn't think we should be adopting names that some people might find offensive and
secondly there is potential liability to the City of Edina by using certain names.
Therefore, this is something that should be adopted as an organization.
Chuck Mooty MOVED TO RECOMMEND THAT THE EDINA PARK BOARD
ADOPT THE FOLLOWING POLICY:
"IT SHALL BE THE POLICY OF THE CITY OF EDINA THAT NO PROGRAM,
EVENT OR ACTIVITY OFFERED BY THE EDINA PARK AND RECREATION
DEPARTMENT WILL USE ANY ETHNIC, RELIGIOUS OR RACIAL NAMES OR
SYMBOLS WHICH MAY, IN THE OPINION OF THOSE GROUPS, CREATE OR
PERPETUATE STEROTYPES WHICH DISTORT OR DEGRADE SUCH GROUPS.
PROGRAMS WHOSE EXPRESS PURPOSE IS TO EXPLORE AND CELEBRATE
THE POSITIVE SPECIAL CONTRIBUTION OF SUCH GROUPS WILL BE EXEMPT
FROM THE POLICY."
Tom White SECONDED THE MOTION.
In Favor: Andrew Finsness, Chuck Mooty, Karla Sitek, Tom White, Bill Jenkins
Opposed: George Klus, David Fredlund, Floyd Grabiel
Abstained: Linda Presthus
Mr. Keprios asked if this motion is to be extended to the athletic associations. Mr. Mooty
replied that the way the policy reads is that no program, event or activity offered by Park
and Recreation. Therefore, it doesn't necessarily relate to all of the other organizations.
Mr. Mooty indicated that he would just substitute Edina for Minneapolis. Mr. Fredlund
commented that he misunderstood the motion and asked that his vote be changed.
Opposed: George Klus and Floyd Grabiel
Ms. Presthus indicated that maybe we could show the athletic associations what we have
for a policy and suggest that they each make a policy of their own.
5
V. DONATIONSIMEMORIALS POLICY
Mr. Keprios explained that he recently received a phone call from the Department of
Natural Resources requesting that Edina donate a bench and put it at Heights Park with a
large plaque next to it that memorializes Joe Alexander, former DNR commissioner. Mr.
Keprios mentioned that he believes Mr. Alexander already has a state park named after
him. He stated that he informed the DNR that the existing informal policy is that we
typically don't put plaques on these smaller donations because it is starting to get out of
control. However, he noted that he would bring this request before the Park Board for
discussion.
Mr. Keprios pointed out that there is no written policy on this and commented that there
isn't a month that goes by where someone doesn't call to donate something. He indicated
that this is wonderful; unfortunately, as life goes down the road tragedy does occur and
the first thing people want is to donate something to the parks. Suddenly we have little
headstones all over and it starts to look like a cemetery.
Mr. Klus asked about the service clubs in the community who want to donate something
to the park. Mr. Keprios replied that service clubs are a different issue in which he has
allowed plaques to indicate donated by such and such club or organization.
Mr. Grabiel asked if someone makes a donation do they receive some kind of official
looking document from the city that says thanks very much for your lovely donation. Mr.
Keprios indicated that he typically sends a thank you letter for tax purposes.
Mr. White explained that the issue of memorials and naming parks after people has
become somewhat of a contentious issue for the Park Board because every month we are
being asked to name something after someone, etc. He noted that at one point the Park
Board was talking about developing some sort of standard for naming items in the city.
Mr. Jenkins indicated that he thinks it would be hard to quantify how the policy would
read because there is always going to be some little exception. Mr. Keprios pointed out
that there are two very different issues here. Naming parks and facilities is a very
separate issue from memorials and permanent plaques. Mr. Keprios commented that
people have asked us to replace plaques that are 60 years old. Mr. Mooty asked if there
would be a way of doing this temporarily, so that after a certain time period of giving
someone credit it's done. Mr. Keprios commented that one of the things they talked
about in the past is that every donation we get that is a certain dollar amount we give
them recognition. This could be done on possibly the back page of the activities
directory or we could buy an ad for the Current Newspaper saying thank you for your
contribution to the park system.
Mr. White asked is there a staff proposal on this issue. Mr. Keprios replied that he would
like to wait to have this discussion until the next Park Board meeting when Mr. Herring is
here because he has a strong interest in this issue. He indicated that he will come up with
a well worded written policy for the next meeting to discuss. Mr. Keprios commented
R
that naming different places after people is very political in nature where he is thinking
more on the memorial side right now.
Mr. Grabiel asked why is this an issue. Mr. Keprios replied he doesn't like the idea of "in
memory of because he feels it's a turn-off and adversely affects the park user's
experience. Secondly, what is the length of time that we are responsible to keep these
plaques up. Mr. Cockriel explained that there was a bench with a plaque at Cornelia Park
for the past 15 to 20 years which was falling apart. Therefore, they took the bench out
and put in a new one. Now this person wants a new plaque with different wording. Mr.
Cockriel explained that the memory has been long gone and the donation over with and
yet they want a new plaque on our bench at the City's expense.
Mr. Mooty noted that he thinks we need to have a way of encouraging people to donate
and there has to be some recognition, especially now when dollars are needed.
Bill Jenkins MOVED TO RECOMMEND TO CARRY THIS ISSUE OVER TO NEXT
MONTH'S PARK BOARD MEETING. Dave Fredlund SECONDED THE MOTION.
MOTION CARRIED.
VI. APPOINTMENT TO EDINA COMMUNITY EDUCATION SERVICES BOARD.
Mr. Keprios expressed a big thank you to Linda Presthus for her willingness to serve on
the Edina Community Education Services Board. He indicated that when Mrs. Presthus
feels there is an issue that is big enough to warrant a discussion from the Park Board he
will put it on the agenda. Mr. Keprios stated that George Klus will fill in when Ms.
Presthus is unable to attend a meeting.
VII.. OTHER
A. Recreational Facilities - Mr. Keprios asked Mr. Mooty if he would bring the Park
Board up to date on the meetings he has been attending regarding some new development
in the community.
Mr. Mooty explained that as many of you know the Lewis Kunz site has been looked at
for potentially having a lot of different activities. He stated that he was approached by an
individual on the City Council asking what the community still feel they need. He
indicated that the more he thought about it, the concept he felt made the most sense was
to try to add a fieldhouse or gymnasium complex off one of the current structures, such as
the community center on the south side. Therefore, the concept would be to add three
gyms onto that south side which would also then be a potential field house for track,
football and indoor soccer. By doing this we would take advantage of the locker rooms
and facilities that are already in place at that location.
Mr. Mooty explained that this is in conjunction with the fact that right now the school is
having to deal with the whole football stadium issue because the seating is going to be
condemned the end of this season. Therefore, the concept that is being toyed with is
h
trying—to-find-away-to enhance a lot -of the -area- over -at- the - community - center. —He- noted
that this is one element of the pie that goes in connection with the development of the
Lewis Kunz site. Mr. Mooty indicated that one way in which they are potentially trying
to fund a portion of the dollars for this is to see if the school can swap its current bus
depot to be either sold or sold back to the city to create dollars for the school to do this.
If this is done then the school district itself . would get a new bus depot at the Kunz Lewis
site.
Mr. Mooty stated that there are a lot of things that need to be done at the community
center. The question is how can those dollars be raised. One idea is the dollars can be
raised through the levies that can be produced or created from the Health and Safety for
the seating of football stadium. However, that is really only a small portion of the .
dollars. Another portion of dollars could come from the school district selling some of
their property and the last portion of dollars would come from a referendum and that is
what the most recent meeting was about.
Mr. Jenkins asked what structure will actually be put on that Lewis Kunz site. Mr. Mooty
replied they are looking at such things as a senior center, library and hopefully the bus
depot. Mr. Mooty stated that the question is how do we get support for dollars. He noted
that we need to take this to the voters and see if it is something that would be saleable to
the community. Therefore, right now they are trying to get a better understanding of
what the costs would be for a potential referendum.
Mr. Jenkins asked if the school district would be responsible for the gymnasiums. It was
noted yes, the school district would be responsible for operating the gymnasiums. Ms.
Sitek asked if the gymnasiums would be attached to which Mr. Mooty replied that yes,
they would be physically attached.
Mr. MacHolda stated that was a great report and asked if the referendum would be for
just those two sites because although three gyms would increase what we have it is still
short of what we project we will need. Mr. Mooty commented that he has proposed that
we include attaching one more gym on another school property. Mr. Jenkins asked why
not build it there to which Mr. Mooty replied because of the size. Mr. Jenkins asked how
many more gymnasiums do we need to which Mr. MacHolda replied that a study he did
two years ago suggested that we would need a minimum of four gyms but could use as
many as eight, which was based on current scheduling trends.
Mr. Keprios indicated that was a great report. He then pointed out that the School
District has asked that the city run the referendum part of this and if it passes that the
school district would operate and maintain the gymnasiums. Mr. Keprios stated that we
also didn't finish everything that we had started out to do in the last referendum.
Therefore, we might possibly be able to finish what we had started if there is a
referendum. He noted that it currently looks like there is a lot of support for this. Mr.
Keprios pointed out that Mr. Mooty has been working really hard behind the scenes and
he applauds him for that and thanked him for all of his efforts.
H.
B. Edinboroud Park - Mr. Keprios noted that he mentioned in his staff report the
unfortunate incident that occurred at Edinborough. Mr. White asked why Ann Kattreh
signed the letter. Mr .Keprios explained that Ann manages the day to day operations at
Edinborough Park, however, Tom Shirley is her supervisor. Mr. Keprios indicated that
he would like to applaud Ms. Kattreh and Mr. Shirley for being right there on the spot.
He noted that the bottom line is that the incident was a result of human error. Staff has
taken all necessary actions to assure that this incident will never happen again.
C. Wooddale Comfort Station - Mr. Keprios noted that a meeting has been set up for
Monday with the Wooddale group. He stated that the architect is going to bring
renderings of what the facility may look like based on the input from that neighborhood
group. He stated that when one is chosen he will have the neighborhood group attend the
Park Board meeting to listen to their input. After this the Park Board will either vote it
up or down where it will then go on to the City Council.
D. Centennial Lakes - Mr. Grabiel commented that his office is at Centennial Lakes
and noted that people are amazed to find out that Centennial Lakes is part of the city park
system. He noted that it is such a wonderful place and the park department should. really
be commended for this. Mr. Keprios stated that he will be sure Mr. Shirley gets that
message. Mr. Mooty asked if this is something that should be promoted by more signage
or something to that effect. Mr. MacHolda commented that it's going to be on the cover
for the 2000 activities Directory.
Mr. Keprios pointed out that the park isn't finished yet. The north and south ends will
soon be developed, which will include more advertising and kiosks for Centennial Lakes
Park and will complete the master plan.
E. Dogs at Bredesen - Mr. Keprios indicated that a resident.has asked him to have an
animal control officer drive his truck around the path at Bredesen Park three times a day
to enforce the dog on leash laws and make sure people are cleaning up after their dogs.
Mr. Keprios stated that Bredesen Park is one of our most heavily used parks. Mr.
Keprios commented that they will be having a baggie dispenser station put in at Bredesen
Park for people to clean up after their dogs. He noted that the animal control officer does
go around to the parks as much as possible.
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
George Klus MOVED TO ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 9:20 P.M. Bill Jenkins
SECONDED THE MOTION. MEETING ADJOURNED.
E
178
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 273
Regular Meeting, October 11, 1999, 7 :00 P.M.
Room 350, Edina Community Center
AGENDA
Determination of Quorum and Call to Order
Approval of Minutes of Meeting of September 13, 1999
Approval of Minutes of Special Meeting of September 29, 1999
ACTION
Page
93
Personnel Recommendations
179-185
94
Expenditures Payable on October 11, 1999
186
95
Normandale Elementary School Back -to -Back
Cultural
187
Exchange Program for 1999/2000
96
Purchase of Toshiba Laptop Computers for
Staff
188 -189
97
Purchase Hewlett Packard Computers
190
Is 98
Purchase of Reason Multimedia Computers for
High
191
School Video Production Class
99
Purchase of Science Curriculum Materials
for Edina
192 -195
Elementary Schools
99a
Annual Report on Curriculum, Instruction,
and
195a -195b
Student Performance (Formerly Called PER
- Planning,
Evaluation and Reporting), appended
CONSENT
100 Commendation of Dan Marsh 196
101 Commendation of Edina High School Students 197
Anne Miller, Richard Hay, and Lindsay Yock
102 Gift from Edina High School PTSO 198
103 Gift from Law Enforcement Resource Center and 199
Greatapes
104 Gift from Normandale Elementary School French 200
TmmerGinn Parent Organization
REPORTS
K -12 Curriculum Review
Curriculum and Instruction Update
INFORMATION
105 Expenditures Payable on September 27, 1999 201
106 Technology Grant 202
107 Universal Service Fund 203
108 Edina High School Orchestra Tour 1999 -00 204
To Italy
109 Varsity Band Tour 1999 -00 205
110 Debate Trip to the Mid - America Cup Tournament 206
in Des Moines, Iowa
111 Debate Trip to the Iowa Caucus Tournament in 207
Cedar Rapids, Iowa
112 Staff Recognition 208
Adjournment 0
* Persons who wish to address the Board are requested to complete and
submit an appropriate form to the Board Secretary prior to the designated
hearing time. When recognized, each individual shall identify
himself /herself and the group represented, if any. He /She shall then state
the reason for addressing the Board and shall be limited in time at the
discretion of the Board chair. individual employees of the School District
or representatives of employee organizations shall have utilized
administrative procedures before making a request to address the Board.
i
'' --
} -�
i
��J
O'bi'ectives
• Preliminary Review of the FAWcial
Proposals
• Discussion of City Risks
•Affordable Housing
•Overview of Traffic Issues
i�adings
Similarities of proposals:
— Method of Property Acquisition I
— Inclusion of Senior Center &Libra
—Use of Tax Increments
— Developer Flexibility
w�INA �l�
�1
o
Ah
•'�COIfPO7L'*�C9 •
1999
HRA/City Risks
• HRA signs letter of intent - Deve er Fails to
Perform
• HRA Incurs Costs - Developer Fails Ils t
Perform
• HRA Incurs Costs - Insufficient Tax Incre
Generated
• Property Acquisition Delayed
�1
0
• !^CO]tPO1lA��O •
1888
e Housing
Livable Communities Act Standard:
✓ Ownership Housing
✓ Rental - 2 Bedroom
• Frauenshuh:
— Condominiums
— Townhouses
$$7on
$190,000 - 21010 0
$395,000 - 425,00
• Jerrys /Laukka Jarvis /Namron
— Condominiums
— Rentals
$150,000 - $200,000
$600 - 2,000 /month
�9. A, -A
�1
ow e � . vt
m •
0
• ,�Cn17PORi CEO •
IBBH
e Housing
Livable Communities Act Standard:
✓ Ownership Housing
✓ Rental - 2 Bedroom
• Opus /Clark
— Condominiums
•Stuart
— Rentals
$1 115-0
$715 %r�on
$190,000 - 350,000
$1,000 - 2,000 + /mo6th
ffic
•All proposals are acceptable
• Three lane operation of Eden is de ' a
•Driveway turn restrictions on Link nec ssa
• Extension of west bound turn lane on V non
necessary
• Second means of access to Richmond Hills
recommended
Bu's-,qarage
• Board of Education Resoluti
• Financial and Land Use Issues
• Implications of Omitting Bus Gara
Property
iective
• Assist City Council with initial re of
proposals
• Seek "apples to apples" comparison
• Avoid "negotiated" changes
- Many variables
- Opportunities to improve and worsen ea
proposal
w91�, 1.11,
o� e�N
�OORPOIi:���
1899
f Analysis
• Property valuation and tax incre trevenue
created by the proposed developm
• Public costs and TIF eligible develop
expense requested by each proposal
• Sources of revenues to cover the propos
COStS
• Feasibility of proposed TIF use
�91rIA,
�1
p o es • ublic Funds
• ��COI7POR�T�O •
1888
• All proposals subject to same p costs
- Library/Senior Center
- Offsite improvements
- City administration and legal
• Land and demolition costs set by City
• Other development costs from proposals
• Retire existing debt
w91N�11.r�r
I I��ORPORi���
S o u rce s' u b I i c F u n d s
1899
• Cash balance in Grandview T trict
•Sale of existing library
• Land purchase by developer
• New debt
- Approach proposed by developer
- Rates and structure assumed by Ehlers
�91riA,
�1
Any 40
• l�'Colt P011 -°j�FO •
1888
nt Projections
• All existing Grandview tax incre t
• Primary information from develope
- Type and quantity of development
- Timing of development
- Basis for property valuation
• Key elements of financial feasibility
USES OF PUBLIC FUNDS
Public Facilities /Improvements
Land /Demolition
Other Development Costs
Subtotal
Pay Off Existing Debt
Bond Issuance
Lau'
Base
6,005,000
3,218,440
650,000
9,873,440
3,594,750
1 78,81 0
No Bus
Garage
6,005,000
1,818,440
650,000
8,473,440
3,594,750
161,810
TOTAL 13,647,000 12,230,000
SOURCES OF PUBLIC FUN
Cash Balance in TIF District
Purch, of Land By Developer
Sale of Existing Library
New G.O. Bonds Required
Pay -As- You -Go Note Req
TOTAL
DEBT SUPPORTABLE
PROJ, FUNDING GAP
DS
2,175,000
3,262,000
1,000,000
7,210,000
0
13,647,000
2,175,000
2,545,000
1,000,000
6,510,000
0
12,230,000
7,210,000 6,510,000
C
C
- Jarvis
• Full
and wit
ded with
us
garage sit
\
- No land or
constructio for
bus garage
• All City bonds
• Substantial
construction in 2000
Base
USES OF PUBLIC FUNDS
Public Facilities /Improvements 6,005,000
Land /Demolition
U a No Bus
No Bus Garage • Y
Garage With
With Hotel Housing no 6
_6,005,000 6,005,000 hotel
4,391,560 2,991,560 2,991,560
Other Development Costs 0 0 0
Subtotal ,
Pay Off Existing Debt 3,594,750 3,594,750 3,594,750
Bond Issuance 103,250 113,250 113,250
funded with
,garage plus
- No coin strutto n
funding
garage
or bus
TOTAL 14, 094, 560 12, 704, 560 12, 704, 560 1* Lowest. l
SOURCES OF PUBLIC FUNDS purchase revep u e
Cash Balance in TIF District 2 175 000 2 175 000 2 175 000
Purch. of Land By Developer
1
2,418,000
I I
2,018,000
I 1
2,018,000
0
Sale of Existing Library
1,000,000
1,000,000
1,000,000
New G.O. Bonds Required
0
0
0
Pay -As- You -Go Note Req.
8,501,560
7,511,560
7,511,560 •
TOTAL
,
DEBT SUPPORTABLE
8,232,123 7,511,560 7,265,476
PROJECTED FUNDING GAP (269,437) 0 (246,083)
All pay -as -you- o
Substantial
construction in
2000
Base
USES OF PUBLIC FUNDS
Public Facilities/improvements 6,005,000
Land /Dem olition
3,351 ,380
Other Developm ent Costs 6,870,000
S ubtotal 16,226,380
Pay Off Existing Debt 3,594,750
Bond Issuance 70,250
TOTAL 1 9,891 ,380
SOURCES OF PUBLIC FUNDS
Cash Balance in TIF District
Purch. of Land By Developer
Sale of Existing Library
New G.O. Bonds Required
Pay -As- You -Go Note Req.
TOTAL
2,175,000
3,700,000
1,000,000
2,795,000
1 0,221 ,380
DEBT SUPPORTABLE 9,865,951
PROJECTED FUNDING GAP (3,150,429)
-Clark
• F
-No con r
for bus gay
ion funding
• No developmb ton
garage site
- Drop $200,000 if o bus
garage \
• Adds most new property
value
• Hurt by timing
Base
USES OF PUBLIC FUNDS
Public Facilities /Improvements 6,005,000
Land /Demolition 0
Fr Wenshuh
No Bus • Fungi
Garage
6,005,000 — lncl
IC
Other Development Costs 10,450,000 7,950,000
Subtotal 3,955,UUU
Pay Off Existing Debt 3,594,750 3,594,750
Bond Issuance 190,250 180,250
TOTAL 20,240,000 17,730,000
SOURCES OF PUBLIC FUNDS
Cash Balance in TIF District
Purch. of Land By Developer
Sale of Existing Library
New G.O. Bonds Required
Pay -As- You -Go Note Req.
TOTAL
DEBT SUPPORTABLE
PROJ. FUNDING GAP
2,175,000 2,175,000
3,250,000 3,250,000
1,000,000 1,000,000
7,815,000 7,305,000
6,000,000 4,000,000
0,240,000 17,730,000
9,919,644 9,124,582
(3,895,355) (2,180,418)
• I
0
constrU
funding
garage
tioh --�
br bus
• Additional use \of
City bonds
• Hurt by timing
sentation
• Current Operations Overview
e Statistical Comparisons
• Strategies for the future
• 1998 Sales - $1,640,224
• 1998 Profit - $110,860
• Advantages of location:
— 50th Commercial Area
— Complementary types of
businesses located nearby
— Store Layout
• Barriers to Success:
— Convenient Parking
— Convenient Location
— Visibility from Road
eet Store
Exterior View
Interior-Vie
CpR� N,T
• 1998 Sales - $3,713,423
• 1998 Profit - $384,411
• Advantages of location:
— Southdale Business Area
— Dedicated Parking
— Visibility from Road
— Store Layout
• Barriers to Success:
— None: 56% increase in sales
from 1996, 104% increase in
profit from 1996
nue Store
Exterior View
Interior Vie
�gZr7A,11?I
- .oe:
ow
• 1998 Sales - $2,529,497
• 1998 Profit - $299,452
• Advantages of location:
enue Store
— Proximity to high income
neighborhoods
— Excellent Corner Location
— Best Profit per square foot of
all three stores
• Barriers to Success:
— Poor Store Layout
— Difficult Access for Parking
and traffic flow
- "Tired" Interior
Exterior View
Interior Vie
ary of Enterprise
Oper ions - 1998
• 1998 Total Sales - $7,986,577
• 1998 Profit - $767,299
• Where did the profits go?
— Art Center - $236,000
— Arena - $222,000
— Reserved within the liquor fund - $309,299
w9�NA �l�
�1
we compare?
'`CUI11Y)RT�t
• Easy to compare to municipal oper
• Difficult to compare to individual pri7va
enterprises (data privacy)
• Some comparisons can be made to natio
market data
9
8
7
6
c 5
0
4
3
2
1
0
1997 Sales - Top 5
C qty
icipal Data
;I
700
600
C
500
n 400
300
200
100
0
7 Profit - Top 5
W -C
0-
N
J W
C qty
Source: 1997 Analysis of Municipal Liquor Operations - State Auditor
T�
O
U
m
N
^L
rn
>
T
C
.1�
�
N
U
0
W
C qty
icipal Data
;I
700
600
C
500
n 400
300
200
100
0
7 Profit - Top 5
W -C
0-
N
J W
C qty
Source: 1997 Analysis of Municipal Liquor Operations - State Auditor
T�
O
U
Distribution of Sales
Average Municipal
Sales Distribution
Liquor
30 °/a
Wine
14%
am --
rseer
51%
Source: Minnesota Municipal Beverage Assoc.1998
Edina
Sale tri ution
Liquor
30% 1.: Misc.
Wine
41%
Dismution of Sales
Average Sales Distribution
National Data
Liquor
31
Wine
13%
Beer
55%
Source: Miller Brewing Company 1998 data
Edina
Sales Distribution
Liquor
Wine
o. W hy is.this important?
Where did the profit e from?
400,000
3009000
L
2005000-Z
100,000
CIS
$214,843
$155347
Wine Beer Liq Misc
Category
. A,
`roll IriV`
s for the Future
• Customer Relations
• Staff Competency
• Product Selection
• Advertising and Marketing
• Infrastructure
Cu'-stmer Relations
• Develop mission statement for 't es
• Do we accommodate our custome
same as other retailers?
— Check verification
— Returns
— Party Planning
— Special Orders
— Deliveries
— Internet Sales
— Keg Sales /Gimmick Products
Cuisto,mer Relations
• Stores are kept neat and well s
1
15"
ed
•Stores are well staffed
• Convenient Locations
• Loyal. customer base
Slaff,,Competency
• Need to make staff more recogrible
— Upgrade work attire
— Display pictures of management team in a
store
• Need to retain part and full time employe s
• Need to increase staff training
— Work with vendors on bi- monthly product
seminars
— Look at continuing education for full time
employees
— Update training manual for employees
ct Selection
• Currently offer a wide selection 'dfliq
and beer \
• New products available in all 3 categ
uor, wine
ies
• Need to create a greater emphasis on e:
—More display space for wine
• Product selection varies at each store -bas`s
on demographics of area
• In -store tastings when available
c Adve g and Marketing
Q2 �/ o
v -2y
• �\�bn�N��ti
• Need to focus on community be its of
liquor stores
• "Wine of the month" promotions
• "Manager's choice" promotions
• Third Party testimonials
• Fall /Spring Wine Promotions
• Establishment of a "Wine Club"
• Increase in -store tastings for customers
o e Adve g and Marketing
q �o
• Bi- monthly newsletters for custbj i- ers
• Create web page under City's website r
information on liquor stores, product, et .
• Educate customers on responsible hostjng
astructure
• 50th Store -newly remodeled in 98, no major changes needed
• York Store - 3 years old, excellent co
•Vernon Store:
— Oldest Store (30+ years)
— Incorrect store layout (cooler by front doors)
— Limited product selection -lack of floor area
— Last major remodel - 1990
— Need to remodel, expand or relocate - we have
had some conversations with Jerry's re:cleaners
15A 944S HNNN 05OCT .... 9 Lunds
`
'
25A 944S NNHN 05OCT99Lunds
a
2JA 944S HNHN 05OCT99 Lunds
6—qbqlq
11 I!
v
10A 944S |�HHN 05UC|99 Luods
f
t�
"d�
�� �
^� 4
� .�
} X � z.:p
1,._.
t r A�A' f
_ . __ ��..
...�. -.
` .'
` ` `
� -
'
'
`�
' 18A 944S HN/w
,
05OCT99 Lunds
rr
_ ._ �
. _ /
i
s
17A 944S NNNN 0 ... OCT99 Lunds
0
30A 944S HHNN 05OCT99 Lur'ds
��
. �_
t
�, :�
�?
� �.-
31A 944S NHNN 05OCT99 Lunds
L_
w '
j
`? ; w, r
rim
i
19A 660S NNNN 20S�P99 Lunds
dL ��
22A 660S NNNN 20SEP99 Lunds
21A 660S NNNN 20SEP99 Lunds
I ,
20A 660S NNNN 20SEP99 Lunds
11 , y .
16A 660S NNNN 20SEP99 Lunds
' _ �� LL * j _
_ ~
'`�
`�
i�
17A 660S NNNN 20SEP99 Lunds .
'
14A 660S NNNN 20SEP99 Lunds
I
a
F;t::.�:a'::; FaFaFdFa