Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999-12-07_COUNCIL PACKETAGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL DECEMBER 7,1999 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Commissioner, Council Member or citizen so requests it. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the Agenda. I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA - Regular Meeting of November 16,1999 Rollcall II. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS - as per pre -list dated 12/2,/99, TOTAL: $31,576.88 III. ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Minutes of November 16,1999 II. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORT ON REDEVELOPMENT - Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by City Manager. Motion to close hearing. Resolution Amending Redevelopment Plan 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass lcall A. GRANDVIEW AREA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT - (HRA & City Council) III. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS - Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Planner Public Comment heard. Motion to close hearing. Zonin Ordinances: First and Second Reading require 4/5 favorable rollcall of all members of Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall of all members of Council to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. Conditional Use Permit: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. Rollcall A. APPEAL OF VARIANCE DENIAL - Lyubov and Eduard Yamnik, 7133 Valley View Road * B. LOT DIVISION - Grace Church, 5300 France Avenue South * C. SET PUBLIC HEARING (12,/21/99) - Preliminary Rezoning and Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Map for Haugland Company, Tracts A and B, Registered Land Survey No. 1378 Hennepin County, Minnesota. IV. AWARD OF BID * A. GMC'/2 Ton Sierra Pick -Up Truck - Park Maintenance Department * B. Twenty Electric Golf Cars for Braemar V. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS A. Freeway Noise Mitigation Report /Receive Petition From Residents * B Resolution Authorizing The Transfer Of Individual Sewage Treatment System Regulation To Hennepin County Agenda/Edina City Council December 7,1999 Page 2 * C. Resolution - Minnesota Department Of Health Amending The Environmental Health Delegation Agreement * D. Year 2000 Council Meeting Dates And Holidays * E. Resolution for Agreement for Participation in Federal Aid Preservation Program for Red Signal Bulb Replacements and Signal Painting * F. Nursing Services Contact for Year 2000 * G. Tax Forfeit Property * H. Letter of Intent with Minnehaha Watershed District Board, Pamela Park Project * I. Resolution Continuing Participation in the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act * J. Braemar Arena Advertising(EHA Proposal VI. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS * A. Receive petition requesting street light installation VII. CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS VIII. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES IX. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL X. MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEM )(I. FINANCE Rollcall A. ORDINANCE NO. 1999 -14 Amending Code Section 185 Increasing Certain Fees (Includes 2000 Liquor Fees Hearing) Rollcall B. RESOLUTION - Park And Recreation Fees For 2000 Rollcall C. RESOLUTION - Ambulance Fees For 2000 RolicaIl D. RESOLUTION - Miscellaneous Fees For 2000 Rollcall E. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS As Per Pre -List Dated 12/2/99 Total: $ 965,065.77 and for Confirmation of Payment of Claims as Per Pre -List Dated 12/2/99 Total: 426,971.43 SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS. Mon Dec 13 Truth In Taxation Cont. Hearing 5:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAk1BE16 Tues Dec 21 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Fri Dec 24 CHRISTMAS DAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed Tues Dec 28 Year End Meeting 5:00 P.M. MANAGERS CONFERENCE RN Fri Dec 31 NEW YEARS DAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed Tues Jan 4 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mon Jan 17 MARTIN LUTHER KING DAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed Tues Jan 18 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY HELD AT CITY HALL NOVEMBER 16, 1999 - 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, and Chair Maetzold. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Faust and seconded by Commissioner Johnson approving the Housing and Redevelopment Authority Agenda as presented with the exception of Approval of the Minutes of the HRA Regular Meeting of November 1, 1999. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold Motion carried. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FOR NOVEMBER 1 1999 APPROVED AS CORRECTED Commissioner Faust asked the Minutes of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority be removed from the Consent Agenda to make a correction. Commissioner Faust made a motion approving the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Minutes for November 16, 1999. Commissioner Johnson seconded. the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold Motion carried. CLAIMS PAID Motion made by Commissioner Johnson approving the Check Register dated November 10, 1999, and consisting of one page totaling $56,481.76. Commissioner Hovland seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold Motion carried. There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, Chair Maetzold declared the meeting adjourned at 7:05 P.M. Executive Director 't RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the following described properties are at present single tracts of land: City Of Edina PARCEL 1: Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, SOUTH HARRIET PARK, 2ND ADDITION, according to the .plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, and Lot 3, Block 1, SOUTH HARRIET PARK, 2ND ADDITION, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, and Lots 4 and 6, Block 1, SOUTH HARRIET PARK, 2ND ADDITION, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, and Lot 5, Block 1, SOUTH HARRIET PARK, 2ND ADDITION, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, and Lot 7, Block 1, SOUTH HARRIET PARK, 2ND ADDITION, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, and Lots, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17, and Lot 9, except the East 150.00 feet thereof, and the Easterly 45.00 feet of Lots 19, 20, and 21; and that part of Lots 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 30, 31, 32, and 33, lying East of the following described line: Commencing at a point on the South line of said Lot 24 a distance of 63.00 feet West of the Southeast corner thereof; thence North to a point on the North line of said Lot 28 a distance of 84.00 feet West of the Northeast corner thereof; thence continuing North along the last described line extended to its intersection with the North line of said Lot 33, said point of intersection being the actual point of beginning of the line being described; thence South along the last described line extended South to its intersection with the South line of said Lot 22 and there terminating; and that part of Lot 29, described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of said Lot 29; thence West along the South line of said Lot 29 a distance of 84.0 feet; thence North to a point on the North line of said Lot 29 which is 81.7 feet West of the Northeast corner of said Lot 29; thence East along the North line thereof -a distance of 81.7 feet to the Northeast corner of said Lot 29; thence South along the East line of said Lot 29 to the Southeast corner of said Lot 29 and the point of beginning; all in Block 1, South Harriet Park 2nd Addition, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, and Except the easterly 150.00 feet of Lot 10, Block 1, SOUTH HARRIET PARK 2ND ADDITION, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, and That part of Lot 18, Block 1, SOUTH HARRIET PARK 2ND ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying Westerly and Southerly of a line described as beginning at the Southeast corner of the West 33.50 feet of said Lot 18; thence North 0 degrees 00 minutes 29 seconds East, a assumed bearing, along the east line of said West 33.50 feet of Lot 18 a distance of 137.60 feet; thence Westerly a distance of 26.45 feet along a non - tangential curve, concave to the North. having a radius of 38.42 feet. a central angle of 39 degrees. 26 minutes, 36 City Hall (612) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA.55424 -1394 TDD (612) 826 -0379 Edina City Council Resolution December 7,19999 Page 2 seconds and a chord bearing of North 79 degrees 32 minutes 39 seconds west to the East line of the West 8.00 feet of said Lot 18; thence North 0 degrees 00 minutes 29 seconds East along said East line of the West 8.00 feet of Lot 18 to the north line of said Lot 18 and said line there terminating. PARCEL 2: The north 100 feet of Lot 18, Block 1, SOUTH HARRIET PARK 2ND ADDITION according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota. PARCEL 3: The west 100 feet of the East 244 feet of the South 150 feet and the West 19 feet of the South 50 feet of the East 144 feet, Lot 18, Block 1, SOUTH HARRIET PARK 2ND ADDITION according to the plat and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the owners have requested the subdivision of said tracts into separate parcels (herein called "Parcels ") described as follows: PARCEL 1: Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, SOUTH HARRIET PARK, 2ND ADDITION, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, and Lot 3, Block 1, SOUTH HARRIET PARK, 2ND ADDITION, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, and Lots 4 and 6, Block 1, SOUTH HARRIET PARK, 2ND ADDITION, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, and Lot 5, Block 1, SOUTH HARRIET PARK, 2ND ADDITION, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, and Lot 7, Block 1, SOUTH HARRIET PARK, 2ND ADDITION, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, and Lots, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17, and Lot 9, except the East 150.00 feet thereof, and the Easterly 45.00 feet of Lots 19, 20, and 21; and that part of Lots 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 30, 31, 32, and 33, lying East of the following described line: Commencing at a point on the South line of said Lot 24 a distance of 63.00 feet West of the Southeast corner thereof; thence North to a point on the North line of said Lot 28 a distance of 84.00 feet West of the Northeast corner thereof; thence continuing North along the last described line extended to its intersection with the North line of said Lot 33, said point of intersection being the actual point of beginning of the line being described; thence South along the last described line extended South to its intersection with the South line of said Lot 22 and there terminating; and that part of Lot 29, described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of said Lot 29; thence West along the South line of said Lot 29 a distance of 84.0 feet; thence North to a point on the North line of said Lot 29 which is 817 feet West of the Northeast corner of said Lot 29; thence East along the North line thereof a distance of 81.7 feet to the Northeast corner of said Lot 29; thence South along the East line of said Lot 29 to the Southeast corner of said Lot 29 and the point of beginning; all in Block 1, South Harriet Park 2nd Addition, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, and I Edina City Council Resolution December 7,19999 Page 3 Except the easterly 150.00 feet of Lot 10, Block 1, SOUTH HARRIET PARK 2ND ADDITION, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota, and That part of Lot 18, Block 1, SOUTH HARRIET PARK 2ND ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying Westerly and Southerly of a line described as beginning at the Southeast corner of the West 33.50 feet of said Lot 18; thence North 0 degrees 00 minutes 29 seconds East, a assumed bearing, along the east line of said West 33.50 feet of Lot 18 a distance of 137.60 feet; thence Westerly a distance of 26.45 feet along a non - tangential curve, concave to the North, having a radius of 38.42 feet, a central angle of 39 degrees 26 minutes 36 seconds and a chord bearing of North 79 degrees 32 minutes 39 seconds west to the East line of the West 8.00 feet of said Lot 18; thence North 0 degrees 00 minutes 29 seconds East along said East line of the West 8.00 feet of Lot 18 to the north line of said Lot 18. and said line there terminating, and The West 8.00 feet of that part of Lot 18, Block 1, SOUTH HARRIET PARK 2ND ADDITION according to the plat on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying northerly of the South 150.00 feet of said Lot 18, and except for: That part of the West 49.50 feet of the South 150.00 ,feet of Lot 18, Block 1, SOUTH HARRIET PARK 2ND .ADDITION, on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying Westerly and Southerly of a line described as beginning at the Southeast corner of the West 33.50 feet of said Lot 18; thence North 0 degrees 00 minutes 29 seconds East, assumed bearing, along the East line of said West 33.50 feet of said Lot 18 a distance of 137.60 feet; thence Westerly a distance of 26.45 feet along a non - tangential curve, concave to the north, having a radius of 38.42 feet, a central angle of 39 degrees 26 minutes 36 seconds and a chord bearing of North 79 degrees 32 minutes 39 seconds West to the East line of the west 8.00 feet of said Lot 18; thence North 0 degrees 00 minutes 29 seconds East along said East line of the West 8.00 feet of Lot 18 to the North line of said South 150.00 feet of Lot 18 and said line there terminating. PARCEL 2: The north 100 feet, except for the West 8 feet of that part of Lot 18, Block 1, SOUTH HARRIET PARK 2ND ADDITION according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota lying northerly of the South 150 feet of said Lot 18. PARCEL 3: The west 100 feet of the East 244 feet of the South 150 feet and the West 19 feet of the South 50 feet of the East 144 feet, Lot 18, Block 1, SOUTH HARRIET PARK 2ND ADDITION according to the plat and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota, and That part of the West 49.50 feet of the South 150.00 feet of Lot 18, Block 1, SOUTH HARRIET PARK 2ND ADDITION, on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying Westerly and Southerly of a line described as beginning at the Southeast corner of the West 33.50 feet of said Lot 18; thence North 0 degrees 00 minutes 29 seconds East, assumed bearing, along the East line of said West 33.50 feet of said Lot 18 a distance of 137.60 feet; thence Westerly a distance of 26.45 feet along a non - tangential curve, concave to the north, having a radius of 38.42 feet, a central angle of 39 degrees 26 minutes 36 seconds and a chord bearing of North 79 degrees 32 minutes 39 seconds West to the East line of the west 8.00 Edina City Council Resolution December 7,19999 Page 4 feet of said Lot 18; thence North 0 degrees 00 minutes 29 seconds East along said East line of the West 8.00 feet of Lot 18 to the North line of said South 150.00 feet of Lot 18 and said line there terminating. WHEREAS, the requested subdivision is authorized under Code Section 810 and it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purpose of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Code Sections 810 and 850; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of the second above described Parcels as separate tracts of land is hereby approved and the requirements and .provisions of code Sections 850 and 810 are hereby waived. to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but only to the extent permitted under Code Sections 810 and 850 subject to the limitations set out in Code Section 850 and said Ordinances are not waived for any other purpose or as to any other provisions thereof, and further subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent Ordinances of the City of Edina .or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those Ordinances. Adopted this 71h day of December, 1999. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) CITY OF EDINA ) SS CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting December 7, 1999, and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this 8th day of December, 1999. `: -P RESOLUTION ELECTING TO CONTINUE PARTICIPATING IN THE LOCAL HOUSING INCENTIVES ACCOUNT PROGRAM UNDER THE METROPOLITAN LIVABLE COMMUNITIES ACT CALENDAR YEAR 2000 City of Edina WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act (Minnesota Statutes Section 473.25 to 473.254) establishes a Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund which is intended to address housing and other development issues facing the metropolitan area defined b), Minnesota Statutes Section 473.121; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Livable Communities fund, comprising the Tax Base Revitalization Account, the Livable Communities Demonstration Account and the Local Housing Incentive Account, is intended to provide certain funding and other assistance to metropolitan area municipalities; and WHEREAS, a metropolitan area municipality is not eligible to receive grants or loans under the Metropolitan Livable Communities fund or eligible to receive.certain polluted sites cleanup funding from the Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic Development unless the municipality is participating in the Local Housing Incentives Account Program under the Minnesota Statutes section 473.254; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act requires the Metropolitan Council to negotiate with each municipality to establish affordable and life -cycle housing goals for the municipality that are consistent with and promote the policies of the Metropolitan Council as provided in the adopted Metropolitan Development Guide; and WHEREAS, each municipality must identify to the Metropolitan Council the actions the municipality plans to take to meet the established housing goals through preparation of the Housing Action Plan; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council adopted, by resolution after a public hearing, negotiated affordable and life -cycle housing goals for each participating municipality; and WHEREAS, a metropolitan area municipality which elects to participate in the Local Housing Incentives Account Program must do so by November 15 of each year; and WHEREAS, for calendar year 2000, a metropolitan area municipality that. participated in the Local Housing Incentive Account Program during the calendar year 1999, can continue to participate under Minnesota Statutes section 473.254 if; (a) the. municipality elects to participate in the Local Housing Incentives Account Program by November 15, 1999; and (b) the Metropolitan Council and the municipality have successfully negotiated affordable and life -cycle housing goals for the municipality: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City of Edina hereby elects to participate in the Local Housing Incentives Program under the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act.during the calendar year 2000. Passed this 7h day of December, 1999. Attest: Debra A. Mangen Dennis F. Maetzold City Hall (612) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 826 -0379 RESOLUTION City of Edina WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina has received from the County of Hennepin a list of lands in said municipality which became the property of the State of Minnesota for non - payment of property taxes, which said list was dated October 13, 1999, Conservation /Non- Conservation Classification List 1106 -C /NC. WHEREAS, the parcels in said list identified as PIN No. 18- 028 -24-42 -0030 (5007 Bruce Avenue) and as PIN NO. 29- 028 -24 -22 -0026 ( Outlot 1, Evans Addition), have heretofore been classified by the Board of County Commissioners of Hennepin County, Minnesota, as non - conservation land the sale thereof and has heretofore been authorized by said Board of County Commissioners; and WHEREAS, it has been determined by the Edina City Council that there is one existing special assessment against the parcel identified as PIN No. 18- 028 -24 -42 -0030, (5007 Bruce Avenue) in the amount of $320.65 for delinquent utility bills on said parcel, and the parcel identified as PIN NO. 29- 028 -24 -22 -0026, ( Outlot 1, Evans Addition), has no pending or levied special assessments against it; and WHEREAS, it has been determined by the Edina City Council that the parcel identified as PIN No. 18- 028 -24-42 -0030, (5007 Bruce Avenue) need not be withheld from sale pursuant to M.S. 85.012, M.S. 92.461; M.S. 282.01, Subd. 8; M.S. 282.018„ Subd. 1, or M.S. 282.018, Subd. 2; and WHEREAS, it is the intent of the City of Edina to acquire the tax forfeited property parcel identified as PIN No. 29- 028 -24 -22 -0026, Outlot 1, Evans Addition for use as public right -of -way. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Edina City Council that the said classifications are hereby approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Edina City Council as follows: 1. that, acting pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 282.01, Subd. 7a, it has determined that said parcel 018 - 028-42 -0030 (5007 Bruce Avenue) shall be offered for public sale according to statute. 2. that that the City Clerk be authorized and directed to file, "Application of Governmental Subdivision for Conveyance of Tax Forfeited Lands," for the following described property contained in Hennepin County Conservation/ Non - Conservation Classification List 1106 N/ NC, said property to be used by the City as hereafter set forth: Outlot 1, Evan Addition (PIN No. 29- 028- 24 -22- 0026), Public Right -of -Way. Adopted this 7th day of December, 1999 Attest: �-- Debra A. Mangen, dity rk Dennis F. Maetzold, Mayor City Hall (612) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 826 -0379 RESOLUTION AMENDING DELEGATION AGREEMENT WITH MINNESOTA DEPARTEMNT OF HEALTH 1nru>7n1Q AQ 4-1,o (-;+xr rif Pdinn hac a DpIpaatinn Agreement with the QUe 2 Ldind Department of Health to perform Food, Beverage and Lodging establishment inspections, and WHEREAS, the City of Edina has adopted the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules 4626.0010 to 4626.1870, and WHEREAS, the Minnesota Food Code, Rules 4626.0010 to 4626.1870 will become effective January 1, 2000. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of .Edina hereby agrees to amend the Delegation Agreement between the Minnesota Department of Health and the City of Edina dated August 1, 1987, by referencing Minnesota Rules 4626.0010 to 4626.1870 in this amendment and to enforce same Rules within the City of Edina. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to execute any necessary amendment to the August 1, 1987, Delegation Agreement. Dated this 711, day of December, 1999. I' r •.' Debra STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) Dennis F. Maetzold CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing City Council Minutes is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of December. 7, 1999, and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this 7th day of December, 1999. Debra A. Mangen, Qj.y Clerk City Hall (612) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 826 -0379 RESOLUTION TRANSFERRING MINNESOTA AGENCY RULES 7080 TO HENNEPIN COUNTY Whereas the City of Edina has been enforcing the individual sewage treatm n ysfef Edina Rules as set for in the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Rules Chapter 7080 and, Whereas, Hennepin County has enacted Hennepin County Ordinance No. 19, adopting Minnesota Rules Chapter 7080, and Whereas, Hennepin County is prepared to enforce these Rules in Edina and, Whereas, the City Council of the City of Edina finds that Hennepin County Ordinance No. 19 provides for the same protection of public health and welfare. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Edina hereby transfers the responsibility of enforcing Minnesota Agency Rules 7080 to Hennepin County and, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that David A. Velde be designated as the agent to act on behalf of the Edina City Council in transferring records held by the City of Edina to Hennepin County. Dated this 7h day of December, 1999. ahAA Debra STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) Dennis F. Maetzold CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing City Council Minutes is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of December 7, 1999, and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this 7th day of December, 1999. n /� Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk City Hall (612) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 826 -0379 COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY 02- DEC - 1999 (1_ ) page 1 - --------- FUND # - 10 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GENERAL-FUND $115,665.31 FUND # 11.. COMMUNITY DEVELP. BLOCK GR $12,886.15 '# 12 ;COMMUNICATIONS $2,250:00 .FUND FUND # 15 WORKING CAPITAL $6,015.53 FUND # 23 ART CENTER $24,217.44 FUND # 25 GOLF DOME FUND $1,205.41 FUND # 26 SWIMMING POOL FUND'. $223.44 FUND # 27 ;'GOLF COURSE FUND $9,195.27 FUND # 28 ICE ARENA FUND $3,553.03• FUND # .30 EDINBOROUGH /CENTENNIAL LAX $20,854.37 FUND # 40 UTILITY FUND $301,519.28 FUND # .41 STORM SEWER UTILITY FUND $14,782`.82 FUND # 42 RECYCLING PROGRAM $28.00 FUND # 50 LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND $331,323.77 FUND # 60 CONSTRUCTION FUND $122,245. -95 $965,965.77* MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CT1:Y HALL NOVEMBER 16,1999 - 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, and Mayor Maetzold. CONSENT AGENDA JTEMS• APPROVED. Motion made by Member Hovland and seconded by Member Johnson approving the Council, Consent Agenda as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly; Maetzold Motion carried. 1999 BOYS SOCCER TEAM AND 1999 GIRLS TENNIS TEAMS COMMENDED FOR WINNING STATE CHAMPIONSHIPS Mayor Maetzold applauded the two teams for their state championships. He related his challenge to Edina High School students at a recent pep rally to help Edina earrt 100 championships. 'With the two State- titles from the soccer and tennis teams this brings Edina's total to 98. Mayor Maetzold introduced the 1999 Edina Boys Soccer Team. He congratulated the team on their excellent. season. Member Kelly introduced the following resolution and moved its approval: RESOLUTION OF COMMENDATION EDINA HIGH SCHOOL 1999 BOYS SOCCER TEAM WHEREAS, the members of the Edina High School 1999 Boys Soccer Team were Champions of the Classic Lake Conference, Section Champions and State Champions; and WHEREAS, success has come to the members of the Team because of their extraordinary ability, hours of practice and the leadership of their coaches; and WHEREAS, as representatives of the City of Edina, the members of the Team exemplified the highest standards of athletic proficiency and good sportsmanship. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that congratulations be extended to the members of the Team: Kyce Chihi Daniel Roddy Phillip Johnson Mike Eastman Jeffrey Shideman Eric Snover Mike Kachan Jeffrey Strickland Chris York Rick Krahl Tommy Weber Anthony Ruben Jonathan Merrill Andy Witchger Aaron Witchger Ryan Anderson Patrick Cronan David Jenson, Coach Jonathan Lewis Alexander Darbut Bill Garner, Asst. Coach Terence O'Connell Robert Guelich BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution be recorded in the Minutes of the Edina City Council and that copies be given to members of the Team. ADOPTED this 16th day of November, 1999. Member Johnson seconded the motion. Page 1 Minutes/Edina City Council/November 16,1999 4 Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold Motion carried. Mayor Maetzold introduced the 1999 Girls Tennis Team. He offered his congratulations on the team's accomplishments and commended them for their diligence and hard work. Member Kelly introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION OF COMMENDATION EDINA HIGH SCHOOL 1999 GIRLS TENNIS TEAM WHEREAS, the members of the Edina High School 1999 Girls Tennis Team were Champions of the Classic Lake Conference, Section Champions and State Champions; and WHEREAS, Jeannette Cluskey was the Singles State Champion, Jane Anderson was the Singles Runner -Up, and Heidi Rovick and Molly Purdy were the Doubles Runner -Up; and WHEREAS, success has come to the members of the Team and individual players because of their extraordinary ability, hours of practice and the leadership of their coaches; and WHEREAS, as representatives of the City of Edina, the members of the Team and individual players exemplified the highest standards of athletic proficiency and good sportsmanship. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that congratulations be extended to the members of the Team: Alexandra Archer Alison Lawrence Jaime Gaard Kelly Berg Sara Pedersen . Susan McClelland Jessica Boe Sarah Dorrian Jane Anderson Jeannette Cluskey Molly Purdy Steve Paulsen, Coach Rebecca Crowe Heidi Rovick Greg Grosz, Asst. Coach Jessica Flint Kristina Bergstad BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that congratulations be extended to Jeannette Cluskey as Singles State Champion, Jane Anderson as Singles Runner -Up, and Heidi Rovick and Molly Purdy as Doubles Runner -Up. AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution be recorded in the Minutes of the Edina City Council and that copies be given to all the members of the Team. ADOPTED this 161h day of November, 1999. Motion seconded by Member Faust. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold Motion carried. PRESENTATION OF CHEMICAL HEALTH WEEK PROCLAMATION Mayor Maetzold presented the Chemical Health Proclamation adopted at the November 1, 1999, meeting to Edina's Chemical Health Coordinator, Kathy Iverson. Ms. Iverson thanked the Council for their support. She handed out information on Chemical Health Week along with Mothers Against Drunk Drivers (MADD) red ribbons, urging everyone to be vigilant in their support of chemical free youth in Edina. MARY HILL SMITH, METROPOLITAN COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE Mayor Maetzold welcomed Mary Hill Smith, Metropolitan Council representative for this area. Ms. Smith Page 2 Minutes/Edina Ci!y Council/November 16,1999 briefly chatted with the Council applauding Edina's accomplishments and asking its support as the Metropolitan Council moves into the next century. Ms. Smith noted she would always be available to answer questions on specific issues challenging the City. The-Council briefly discussed upcoming traffic issues including reconstruction of I -494 and the potential for light rail with Ms. Smith. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF OCTOBER 19, 1999, APPROVED Motion made by Member Hovland and seconded by Member Johnson approving the minutes of the November 1, 1999 Regular Council Meeting. Motion carried on rollcall vote% five. ayes. PUBLIC HEARINGS CONDUCTED ON SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS: ASSESSMENTS LEVIED Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Due notice having been given, public hearings were conducted. Presentation By Engineer Engineer Hoffman informed the Council that the Grandview Area Maintenance assessment will be the first one levied in this area. He noted that it was similar to the maintenance assessment levied against the businesses at '50th and France. --The assessment rate was calculated at 3.84 cents per .assessable foot, with 364,043 assessable feet in, the district. The total assessment came to $14,012.20. Mr. Hoffman stated that he had two phone calls from property owners with questions relative to the amount and reason for the assessment. Mayor Mae.tzold called for public comment. No one appeared. Member Johnson introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION LEVYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR GRANDVIEW AREA MAINTENENCE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT NO. M -99G WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Edina City Council has met and heard and passed upon all written and oral objections to the proposed assessments for the Grandview Area Maintenance Improvement Project No. M- 99 -G. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, "Minnesota, as follows: 1. Each assessment as set forth in the assessment rolls on file in the office of the City Clerk for each aforementioned improvement is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. The assessments shall be payable in equal installments, the first of said installments, together with interest at a rate of seven and one half (71/2 %)percent per annum, on the entire assessment from the date hereof to December 31, 2000, to be payable with the general taxes for the year 2000. To each subsequent installment shall be added interest at the above rate for one year on all then unpaid installments. The number of such annual installments shall be as follows: NAME OF IMPROVEMENT NO. OF INSTALLMENTS Page 3 Minutes/Edina City Council/November 16,1999 Maintenance Improvement No. M -99G, Levy No. 14760 1 year 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution and they may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Treasurer the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year. 4. The clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such assessment shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted this 16th day of November, 1999. Motion for adoption of the resolution seconded by Member Faust. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold Resolution adopted. Presentation by ngineer Mr. Hoffman stated the curb and gutter assessment was a petitioned improvement with 100% of the affected property owners signing letters waiving their right to a hearing. The project has been assessed on a footage basis to the eight residents requesting its installation. Special assessments against individual properties range between $672.00 and $3,186.00. He reported that homeowners are satisfied with the curb and gutter installation. Mayor Maetzold called for public comment. No one appeared. Member Kelly introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION LEVYING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR CURB AND GUTTER WEST 48TH STREET FROM MAPLE ROAD TO TOWNES ROAD PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT NO. B -99 WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Edina City Council has met and heard and passed upon all written and oral objections to the proposed assessments for the Curb and Gutter Improvement No. B -99 West 481h Street from Maple Road to Townes Road. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: 1. Each assessment as set forth in the assessment rolls on file in the office of the City Clerk for each aforementioned improvement is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. 2. The assessments shall be payable in equal installments, the first of said installments, together with interest at a rate of seven and one half (7' /2 %)percent per annum, on the entire assessment from the date hereof to December 31, 2000, to be payable with the general taxes for the year 2000. To each subsequent installment shall be added Page 4 Minutes/Edina City Council/November 16,1999 interest at the above rate for one year on all then unpaid installments. The number of such annual installments shall be as follows: NAME OF IMPROVEMENT NO. OF INSTALLMENTS Curb & Gutter Improvement No. B -99, Levy No. 14761 10 years 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date, of payment, to the City Treasurer, except that no interest shall be charged if. the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of this resolution and they may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City. Treasurer, the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid,-with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31. of the next succeeding year. 4. The clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the County. Such assessment shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. Adopted this 16th day of November, 1999. 1 ' Motion for adoption of the resolution seconded by Member Johnson. Rollcall: ,. Ayes: Faust, Hovland,.Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold Resolution adopted.. . ORDINANCE 1999 -12 REPEALING SECTION 720 AND REPLACING IT WITH SECTION 721 (FOOD CODE) ADOPTED Sanitarian Velde reviewed the proposed changes to the Code. He explained the changes were needed to bring Edina's Code into compliance with Minnesota Statutes that has recently been updated after two years of hearings at the State level. The State now expects all delegated agencies, such as Edina to adopt the changes. Member Kelly introduced Ordinance 1999 -12 and moved adoption. with waiver of second reading, noting the Ordinance would not be effective until January 1, 2000: Edina Ordinance No. 1999-12 AN ORDINANCE REPEALING SECTION 720 OF THE CITY CODE AND REPLACING IT WITH A NEW SECTION 721 FOR THE PURPOSES OF REGULATING FOOD ESTABLISHMENTS The City Council of the City of Edina Ordains: Section 1: Section 720 of the City Code is repealed in its entirety.. Section 2. The City Code is amended by adding a new Section 1326 as follows: Section 721- Food Establishments and Food Vending Machines 721.01 Purpose and Objectives. The purpose of this Section is to establish standards to protect the health, safety and general welfare of the public pursuant to powers granted under Minnesota Statutes Section 145A.03 through 145A.14 and Section 412.221 and subsequent amendments as adopted. The general objectives of this Section include the following: A. Prevent Food -borne illness. B. Correct and prevent conditions that may adversely affect persons utilizing food establishments. Page 5 Minutes/Edina City Council/November 16,1999 W C. Provide minimum standards for the design, construction, operation and maintenance of food establishments. D. Meet consumer expectations of the quality and safety of food establishments. 721.02 Scope. This Section shall be applicable to all food establishments where food, meals, lunches or beverages are prepared or served for consumption on the premises or immediate consumption off the premises. This Section shall not apply to food service operations conducted in and for a House of Worship when the food service is primarily limited to preparation, service or consumption by the members of the House of Worship, or food service operations licensed by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture pursuant to M.S. 28A. 721.03 License Administration. Subd.1 License Required. No person shall operate a food establishment or operate any of the following types of enterprises within the City without first obtaining a license of the applicable type described in this Section, pursuant to this Section: • Low Risk Food Establishment • Medium Risk Food Establishment • High Risk Food Establishment • Supervised Group Home • Additional Facility License • Food Vehicle • Food Vending Machine • Itinerant Food Establishment • Pushcart Food Establishment An additional fee will be required for the following food establishments: • Beer or Wine Table Service • Alcohol Service from a Bar Subd. 2. Application and License Fee. A. The application for a license under this Section shall be submitted on forms provided by the City Clerk. The application shall be accompanied by a fee in the amount set forth in Section 185 of this Code. All license applications applied for after October 1 of each year may be charged one half of the license fee except the base fee may not be reduced by one half. B. Each application for license for a Low Risk Food Establishment, Medium Risk Food Establishment, High Risk Food Establishment or Supervised Group Home, shall include a base fee as set forth in Section 185 of this Code. Subd. 3. License Procedure and Control. The provisions of Section 160 of this Code Shall apply to all licenses required by this Section and to the holder of such licenses. Subd. 4. Term. Licenses issued pursuant to this Section shall expire on March 31 of each calendar year. 721.04 Self- Inspection Program. Subd. 1. Every licensee of a food establishment shall arrange for and maintain a program of sanitation self- inspection conducted by the owner, manager, sanitation supervisor or designated agent. Subd. 2. Every licensee self- inspection program shall be acceptable to the Health Authority. Page 6 Minutes/Edina City Council/November 16,1999 721.05 Safety. Subd. 1. Carbon dioxide and bottled gas cylinders must be secured by chains or other types of restraint. 721.06 Standards Adopted. Subd. 1 Minnesota Food Code. Minnesota Rules 4626.0010 through 4626.1870, the Minnesota Food Code, in effect on the effective date. of this Section, and all future revisions thereof, are hereby adopted by reference and made a part of this ordinance except'where they are specifically amended by this Section. Subd. 2 Definitions Amended. Minnesota Rules 4626.0020 are hereby amended by including the following terms and the meanings given them: Additional Facility License is food service or operation which is separate, distinct or unique from the central or main food establishment, as determined by the Health Authority. Alcohol Service from a Bar is a food establishment where alcoholic mixed drinks are served or where beer or wine are served, from a bar. Beer pr Wine Table Service is a food establishment which serves only beer or wine to customers -seated at tables. Health Authority where used in this Section shall mean a designated member of the City of Edina Health Department. The term "regulatory authority" in the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Chapter 4626 shall mean Health Authority. Itinerant Food Establishment is a food establishment operating for a temporary period, including but not limited to a fair, carnival, circus, church supper or public exhibition. Low Risk, Medium Risk and High Risk Food Establishment are food establishments as defined in M.S. 157. Pushcart Food Establishment is any non self propelled vehicle limited to serving non- potentially hazardous foods or commissary- wrapped food maintained at proper temperatures, or limited to the preparation. and serving of frankfurters and other precooked ready -to -eat link sausages. Supervised Group Home is a food establishment which includes sleeping accommodations for five (5) or more regular boarders and no more than ten (10) regular boarders for periods of one week or more and which provides supervision for the boarders and is registered for special services pursuant to M.S. 157.17. Subd. 3 Standards Amended. The above adopted Rules are hereby amended as follows: A. Minnesota Rules 4626.0410 TIME AS PUBLIC HEALTH CONTROL. Subp. 2. Notification. "The food establishment must submit written Page 7 Minutes/Edina City Council/November 16,1999 notification to the regulatory authority for approval of its intention to use the procedures provided under this part prior to implementing the provisions of this part." B. Minnesota Rules 4626.0925 MECHANICAL WASHING "A. Except as specified in item 2, linens shall be mechanically washed. B. In food establishments in which only wiping cloths are laundered as specified in part 4626.0695, item B, the wiping cloths may be laundered in a mechanical clothes washer, a sink designated only for laundering wiping cloths, or a ware- washing or food preparation sink that is cleaned as specified in part 4626.0750." C. Minnesota Rules 4626.1050 HANDWASHING LAVATORY; WATER TEMPERAURE AND FLOW. "A. A handwashing lavatory shall be equipped to provide water at a temperature of at least 43 degrees C (110 degrees F) but not more than 54 degrees C (130 degrees F). B. A steam mixing valve shall not be used at a handwashing lavatory. C. An automatic self - closing faucet shall provide a flow of water for at least 15 seconds without the need to reactivate the faucet." D. Minnesota Rules 4626.1325 SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS; INDOOR AREAS "Item A. Except as specified in Item B, materials for indoor floor wall and ceiling surfaces under conditions of normal use shall be: (1) smooth, durable and easily cleanable for areas where food establishment operations are conducted; (2) closely woven and easily cleanable carpet, where carpeting is permitted; and (3) nonabsorbent and constructed of material which resists the wear and abuse to which they are subjected such as quarry tile, ceramic tile, or terrazzo, for food preparation areas, wait station, kitchen, bar, walk - in refrigeration, warewashing, toilet, and interior garbage and refuse storage areas; areas subject to flushing or spray cleaning methods; and other areas subject to moisture. Antislip flooring may not be used beneath fixed equipment." E. Minnesota Rules 4626.1440 HANDWASHING CLEANSER AND NAILBRUSH; AVAILABILITY." Each handwashing lavatory or group of two adjacent lavatories shall have available: A. A supply of liquid hand soap or powder dispensed from a mounted dispenser, or bar soap, and B. A nailbrush at the handwashing lavatory used by employees." F. Minnesota Rules 4626.1445 HAND DRYING , PROVISION. "Each handwashing lavatory or group of adjacent lavatories shall be provided with: A. Individual, disposable towels in a mounted dispenser; B. A continuous towel system that supplies the user with a clean towel; or C. A heated -air hand drying device except that a heated -air hand drying device shall not be the only device provided at a sink used by food employees in a food preparation or warewashing area." Page 8 Minutes/Edina City Council/November 16,1999 G. Minnesota Rules 4626.1465 TOILET TISSUE; AVAILABILITY. "A supply of toilet tissue in a mounted dispenser shall be available at each toilet. H. Minnesota Rules 4626.1470 LIGHTING INTENSITY. "All areas in which food is prepared, processed, manufactured, packaged or stored; or where utensils and equipment are washed; handwashing areas, locker rooms, toilet A. -All food contact surfaces must be .illuminated at not less than seventy (70) foot - candles of light. B. At least thirty (30) foot- candles of light must be provided on all other surfaces and equipment. C. In food and equipment storage areas, a minimum of twenty (20) foot- candles of light measured at 30 inches from the floor must be provided. D. Subdued lighting in dining rooms and public access areas is permissible, provided that lighting meeting the .above requirements must be available during all clean -up and maintenance periods in • dining rooms and access areas." I. Minnesota Rules 4626.1715, DENIAL, REVOCATION, OR REFUSAL TO RENEW; APPEALS, paragraph B, is amended to read as follows: "B. A person may appeal the denial, revocation, or refusal to renew a variance by filing a written appeal to the City Council with the City Clerk within ten days of notification of the denial, revocation or refusal to renew said variance. The City Council shall hear such appeal at the next scheduled City Council Meeting." J. Minnesota Rules 4626.1720, REVIEW OF PLANS is amended by replacing paragraph B with the following. "B. Plans, specifications, an applications form and fees as set forth in Code Section 185 shall be submitted to the regulatory authority at least 30 days before beginning construction, extensive remodeling or conversion of a food establishment." Section 3. Effective Date. This Section shall become effective January 1, 2000. Adopted this 161h day of November, 1999. Attest City Clerk. Mayor Member Hovland seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold Motion carried. ORDINANCE 1999 -13 AMENDING SECTION 735, HOTELS, LODGING AND BOARDING HOUSES ADOPTED Mr. Velde explained that Edina Code Section 735 regulates Hotels, Motels and Lodging establishments in Edina. Over the last few years there have been changes in boarding and lodging establishments not addressed by the current Code. The proposed definitions will better identify boarding and lodging establishments such as small group homes. Page 9 Minutes/Edina City Council/November 16,1999 Following a brief discussion Member Kelly introduced Ordinance 1999 -13 and moved adoption with waiver of second reading, noting the Ordinance would not be effective until January 1, 2000: Edina Ordinance No. 1999-13 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 735 HOTELS, LODGING AND BOARDING HOUSES The City Council of the City of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Section 735.01 is amended by adding the following definitions. Supervised Group Home. Whenever used in this Section, the term Supervised Group Home shall be as defined in Code Section 721.06, Subd. 2. Boarding and Lodging House. Whenever used in this Section, the term Boarding and Lodging House shall mean an establishment which includes boarding and lodging for five (5) or more regular boarders but no more than ten (10) regular boarders for periods of one week or more. Section 2. Section 735.02 is deleted and replaced by the following-language: 735.02 License Required. No person shall operate or engage in the business of operating a hotel, supervised group home, boarding and lodging house, lodging establishment or boarding establishment within the City unless a license has been obtained from the City. The applicant for a license shall make application on forms provided by the City Clerk. The provisions of Section 160 of this Code shall apply to all licenses required by this Section and to the holders of such license. Section 3. Effective Date. This Section shall become effective January 1, 2000. Adopted this 16th day of November 1999. Attest City Clerk Mayor Member Hovland seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold Motion carried. ORDINANCE NO. 1999 -11 ESTABLISHING A TIME LIMIT FOR USE OF AN APPROVED FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN ADOPTED Planner Larsen noted the proposed ordinance that was granted first reading October 19, 1999, would place a two year, limit for beginning work on an approved Final Development Plans. The amendment would also affect final Development Plans which have been approved in the past, but not yet been initiated. Approved plans would lapse two years after the effective date of the amendment. Mr. Larsen added the amendment would not affect the zoning of a property, only the approved development plan. After a brief discussion, Member Johnson made a motion granting second reading to Ordinance No. 1999-11 as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 1999-11 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 850 OF THE CITY CODE BY ESTABLISHING A TIME LIMIT Page 10 i Minutes/Edina Ci!y Council/November 16,1999 FOR APPROVED FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS: Section 1. Paragraph C of Subdivision 2, of Subsection 850.04 of the City Code is amended by adding the following subparagraph 11: 11. Lapse of Approved Final Development Plan by Non -User; Extension of Time. a.' If a building permit has not been obtained, and if erection or alteration of a building, as described in the application for final development plan, has not begun within two years after final development plan approval, the approval shall be null and void unless a petition for extension of time in which to commence the proposed work or improvements has been granted. b. A petition for extension shall be made in writing and filed with the City Clerk within such two year period- The petition shall state reasons showing why a building permit has not been- obtained, or why erection or alterations have not commenced, and shall state the additional time requested to begin the proposed work or improvement. The petition shall be presented to the Council for hearing • and decision in the same manner as then required for an original application. The Council may grant an extension of up to one year upon finding that: i. there is a reasonable expectation that the proposed work or improvement will commence during the extension, and ii.: the facts which were the basis for approving the final development plan have not materially changed. No more than one extension shall be granted. Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage and publication. For purposes of this ordinance final development plans approved prior to the effective date shall be considered to have been approved as of the effective date. Adopted this 16th day of November, 1999. Attest City Clerk Member Kelly seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold Motion carried. Mayor *TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW OF NOVEMBER 1, 1999, APPROVED Motion made by Member Hovland and seconded by Member Johnson approving the Traffic Safety Staff Review of November 1, 1999, Section A, as follows: 1. Install flashing lights and larger signs including advance warning signs at the pedestrian crosswalk on West 70th Street, mid -block between York Avenue and France Avenue and to deny the request for a new crosswalk between the Galleria and US Bank of West 701h Street 2. Install signs on Ohms Lane at West 73rd Street directing vehicles southbound on Ohms Lane at West 73rd Street to merge to a single lane. Sections B and C. Motion carried on rollcall votes - five ayes. Page 11 Minutes/Edina Cif Council/November 16,1999 SPRINT SPECTRUM ANTENNA AUTHORIZED ON VAN VALKENBURG WATER TOWER Assistant City Manager Anderson presented the request from Sprint Spectrum to install six panel antennas on the corrugated section of the Water Tower next to Van Valkenburg Park, 60 feet from ground level. Part of the installation would include a fenced area for ground equipment 15 feet beyond the drip -line of the water tower. The equipment would be located in a 20 foot x 20 foot fenced compound on the SE corner of the tower area. Mr. Anderson noted that at this location the land contour and treeline will shelter the compound from public view. He added that all equipment will be outside the tower. Mr. Anderson explained that Sprint also requests the right to add three additional antennas at a future time. He reviewed the proposed lease terms: 1) $15,000 per year ($1,250 /month) for six antennas; 2) right to locate an additional three antennas for an additional $3,000 per year ($250 /month); 3) initial lease term of five years with an option for four consecutive periods of five years each, option payment of $1,000; and 4) increase for each renewal term would be the greater of 20% or Minnesota CPI - the option for three would increase by same percentage. Mr. Anderson stated that staff would like: authorization to hire an outside attorney since Dorsey represents Sprint; conceptual approval of the lease and its financial terms; and direction to prepare the lease. Council discussed the potential antenna lease. Their questions included how the proposed lease terms compared to other municipal antenna leases. Council also expressed concern with the twenty year lease term. Staff replied that the City's lease terms compare very favorably with those in other cities, noting that there is a great disparity in lease terms. He added that the long term lease should be to the City's advantage. Member Johnson made a motion: 1) authorizing staff to hire an outside attorney; 2) conceptually approving the antenna placement and lease terms as presented; and 3) directing staff to prepare the lease. Member Kelly seconded the motion. Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold Motion carried. *PUBLIC HEARING SET OF DECEMBER 7, 1999, FOR 2000 BEER AND WINE FEES Motion made by Member Hovland and seconded by Member Johnson setting December 7, 1999 as the date for the public hearing to review proposed fees for beer and wine for 2000. Motion carried on rollcall votes - five ayes. *RESOLUTION ADOPTED AUTHORIZING MnDOT ROADSIDE BEAUTIFICAITON PROTECT FOR T.H. 62 AT TRACY AVENUE Motion made by Member Hovland and seconded by Member Johnson for adoption of the following resolution: RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Edina, enter into MN/DOT Agreement No. 79634 with the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation for the following purposes, to wit: Page 12 Minutes/Edina Ci!y Council/November 16,1999 To provide for payment by the State_ to the City for acquisition of landscape materials to be placed along the north side of Trunk Highway No. 62 from Tracy Avenue to 1/3 mile east of Tracy Avenue within the corporate City limits under State Project no. 2763 -969B (62 =5) BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the proper City officers be and hereby are authorized to execute such agreement, and thereby assume for and on behalf of the City all of the contractual obligations contained therein. Passed and adopted this 161h day of November, 1999. Motion carried. on rollcall votes - five ayes. COUNCIL YEAR END MEETING DATE SET - DECEMBER 28,1999,5:00 P.M. Following a brief discussion, Tuesday December 28, 1999,. at 5:00 P.M. was chosen as the date for the Council Year End Meeting to be held in the Manager's Conference Room. PUBLIC HEARING HELD PARK PLAZA REFUNDING BONDS SALE AUTHORIZED Affiddvits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Attorney Gilligan yxplained'. that the City received a request to authorize the issuance of refunding bonds for the Edina Park Plaza Projeet. He noted that issuance of the bonds has no effect on the City's bonded indebtedness or bond rating. Since it is a revenue bond there is no liability to the City for its issuance. Mr. Gilligan concluded noting that the City will receive a fee for allowing Park Plaza to refund its bonds. Member Hovland introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF VARIABLE.RATE DEMAND MULTIFAMILY HOUSING. REVENUE REFUNDING BONDS (EDINA PARK PLAZA PROJECT - FREDDIE MAC CREDIT ENHANCED), SERIES 1999, AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF NECESSARY DOCUMENTS BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "City "), as follows: Section 1. Recitals and Findings. 1.1. By the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C, as amended (the "Act "), the City is authorized to plan, administer, issue and sell . revenue bonds or obligations to make or purchase loans to finance one or more multifamily housing developments within its boundaries, which revenue bonds or obligations shall be payable solely from the revenues of the development. Pursuant to Section 462C.07, Subdivision 1 of the Act, in the purchase or making of multifamily housing loans and the issuance of revenue bonds or other obligations the City may exercise within its corporate limits any of the powers the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency may exercise under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462A; without limitation under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 475. 1.2. The Act provides that the City may plan, administer and make or purchase a loan or loans to finance one or more developments of the kinds described in Subdivisions Page 13 Minutes/Edina City Council/November 16,1999 2, 3, 4 and 7 of Section 462C.05 of the Act, upon adoption of a program setting forth the information required by Subdivision 6 of Section 462C.05 of the Act. 1.3. The City adopted on June 17, 1985 a housing program (the "Original Program ") under the Act relating to a multifamily housing development, consisting of acquisition of land located at 3330 Edinborough Way in the City and the construction and equipping thereon of a residential rental facility containing approximately 203 housing units and including functionally related and subordinate facilities (the "Development "). 1.4. Pursuant to the Original Program, the City issued its Housing Development Revenue Bonds (FHA Insured Mortgage Loan - Edina Park Plaza Project), Series 1985 (the "1985 Bonds "), and used the net proceeds of the 1985 Bonds to make a mortgage loan to Edina Park Plaza Associates Limited Partnership, an Illinois limited partnership (the "Original Owner ") and a supplemental loan to Partners for Senior Communities, Inc., an Illinois corporation and a general partner of the Original Owner, to finance the acquisition, construction and equipping of the Development. 1.5. Pursuant to an amendment to the Original Program adopted by the City under the Act and a Trust Indenture, dated as of November 15, 1989, between the City and First Trust National Association (now known as U.S. Bank Trust National Association), as trustee, the City issued $17,415,000 in original principal amount of its Housing Development Refunding Revenue Bonds (FHA Insured Mortgage Loan - Edina Park Plaza Project), Series 1989 -A and Series 1989 -B (collectively, the "Prior Bonds "), for the purpose of refunding and redeeming the City's then outstanding 1985 Bonds. 1.6. Pursuant to covenants and restrictions entered into in connection with the Prior Bonds, the Development is required to be occupied for a specified period of time primarily by elderly persons and in part (at least 20 %) by persons and families of low and moderate income. 1.7. This Council has received a proposal from Brookdale Living Communities of Minnesota, Inc., a Delaware corporation and the current owner of the Development (the "Owner "), that the City refinance the cost of the Development by issuing its refunding revenue bonds (the "Bonds "), for the purpose of refunding and redeeming the outstanding Prior Bonds. 1.8. The City has been advised by representatives of the Owner and U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray Inc., of Minneapolis, Minnesota (the "Underwriter "), that on the basis of information available to them and their discussions with the Owner and potential purchasers of bonds, the Bonds could be sold at favorable rates and terms to refund and redeem the Prior Bonds and refinance the Development. 1.9. The full faith and credit of the City will not be pledged to or responsible for the payment of the principal of, premium, if any, or interest on the Bonds. 1.10. The City has received drafts of the following documents in connection with the proposed issuance and sale of the Bonds, and has caused such documents to be placed on file in the office of the City Clerk: (a) a Trust Indenture (the "Indenture ") proposed to be entered into between the City and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, in Saint Paul, Minnesota, as trustee (the "Trustee "); (b) a Financing Agreement proposed to be entered into between the City, the Owner, the Trustee and Glaser Financial Group, Inc. (the "Servicer "); Page 14 Minutes/Edina City Council/November 16,1999 (c) an Amended and Restated Declaration of Covenants proposed to be entered into between the City, the Trustee and the Owner; (d) a Multifamily Mortgage, Assignment of Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Financing Statement proposed to be executed by the Owner, as mortgagor, to the City, as mortgagee; (e) an Assignment of Mortgage proposed to be executed by the City in favor of the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (f) a Direct Pay Credit Enhancement .Agreement proposed to be entered into by Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation ( "Freddie Mac ") and the Trustee; (g) a Bond Purchase Agreement (the 'Bond Purchase Agreement ") proposed to be entered into. between the City, the Owner and. the Underwriter; (h) a Remarketing Agreement proposed to be entered into between the Owner and the Underwriter, as Remarketing Agent; and (i) a Preliminary Official Statement relating to the Bonds (the "Preliminary Official Statement ") to be used by the Underwriter in the offer and sale of the'Bonds. The documents described in- clauses (a), (b); (c), (d), (e) and ._(g) are referred to herein collectively as the "City Financing Documents." 1.11. Pursuant to notice duly published in a newspaper of general circulation in the City not less than 15 days prior to the date fixed therefor, this Council held a public hearing on November 16,1999, on the proposed issuance of the Bonds and the refinancing of the Development, at which all interested persons were afforded an opportunity to express their views, in person or in writing. Section 2. Approval and Authorization. 2.1. Based on the information presented at the public hearing referenced in Section 1._11 and other available information, this Council hereby approves and authorizes upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth the refinancing of the Development and the issuance of the Bonds to refund the Prior Bonds or, if the Owner has provided its own funds or borrowed funds to redeem or discharge the Prior Bonds, to reimburse the Owner therefor. 2.2. It is hereby determined that it is desirable for the City to proceed with the issuance of the Bonds in fully registered form, in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $15,040,000, bearing interest at the interest rates established from time to time pursuant to the Indenture, with the Initial Rate (as defined in the Indenture) not to exceed six percent (6.00 %) per annum, maturing not later than December 1, 2029, and bearing the further terms and conditions set forth in the Indenture heretofore filed with the. City (as the same may be amended or completed as hereinafter provided). Subject to the limitations set forth in this Section 2.2, authority is hereby delegated to the Mayor and the City Manager of the City, acting jointly, to determine the aggregate principal amount of Bonds to be issued, the maturities thereof and the Initial Rate of interest payable thereon. 2.3. The form of the Bond Purchase Agreement heretofore filed with the City is hereby approved, subject to such changes as may be deemed desirable by the Mayor, the City Manager and the City Attorney. The Mayor and the City Manager of the City are hereby authorized and directed, on behalf of the City, to execute and deliver a bond Page 15 Minutes/Edina City Council/November 16,1999 purchase agreement in substantially the form of the Bond Purchase Agreement heretofore filed with the City, together with such changes and completions thereof as may be approved by the Mayor, the City Manager and the City Attorney, subject to the limitations contained in this resolution, the execution thereof to constitute conclusive evidence of the approval of such changes and completions. 2.4. Authority is hereby delegated to the Mayor and the City Manager of the City, acting jointly, to determine the aggregate purchase price of the Bonds, provided that the aggregate compensation to the Underwriter (whether in the form of a discount, fees or other compensation) shall not exceed an amount equal to 0.75% of the aggregate principal amount of the Bonds. 2.5. The forms of the City Financing Documents heretofore filed with the City are hereby approved. The Mayor and the City Manager of the City are hereby authorized and directed, on behalf of the City, to execute and deliver the City Financing Documents in substantially the forms hereby approved, but including such modifications, insertions and additions as are necessary and appropriate in their opinion and in the opinion of the City Attorney and consistent with the Act. The execution of the City Financing Documents by the appropriate officers of the City shall be conclusive evidence of the approval thereof by the City. 2.6. The distribution of a preliminary official statement to prospective purchasers, in substantially the form of the Preliminary Official Statement heretofore filed with the City and with such changes, insertions, omissions and revisions as the Mayor, City Manager and City Attorney shall deem advisable, and the use thereof by the Underwriter in connection with the offering of such Bonds, are hereby authorized and approved. The City hereby consents to the preparation and use of a final Official Statement, in substantially the form of the Preliminary Official Statement; provided, however, that the City has not conducted any investigation as to the accuracy or completeness of the Preliminary Official Statement and takes no responsibility for, and makes no representations or warranties as to, the accuracy, completeness or sufficiency of the information contained therein or in the final Official Statement, except as to information regarding the Issuer as provided in the Bond Purchase Agreement. The City Manager is hereby authorized to deem the Preliminary Official Statement "near final," as of its date, for purposes of Rule 15c2 -12 promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. 2.7. The Mayor and the City Manager of the City are authorized and directed to prepare and execute the Bonds and -to deliver them to the Trustee pursuant to the Indenture for authentication and delivery to the purchasers thereof, together with a certified copy of this resolution and other documents required by the Trust Indenture. As provided in the Indenture, the Bonds shall be executed by the manual or facsimile signatures of the Mayor and City Manager and shall be authenticated by the Trustee, as authenticating agent, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 475.55, Subdivision 1. 2.8. As provided in the Indenture, the Bonds are special, limited obligations of the City. Principal of, premium, if any, and interest on, and the purchase price with respect to, the Bonds are payable solely out of the revenues derived from the sources described in the granting clauses of the Indenture. Neither the State of Minnesota nor the County of Hennepin shall in any event be liable for the payment of the principal of, premium, if any, or interest on, and the purchase price with respect to, the Bonds or for the performance of Page 16 Minutes/Edina City Council/November 16,1999 any pledge, mortgage, obligation or agreement. of any kind whatsoever that may be undertaken by the City: Neither the Bonds nor any of the agreements or obligations of the City contained in the City Financing Documents shall be construed to constitute an indebtedness of the State of Minnesota, the County of Hennepin or the City within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory provisions whatsoever, nor to constitute or give rise to a pecuniary liability or be a charge against the general credit or taxing power of the State of Minnesota, the County of Hennepin or the City. 2.9. The Mayor, the City Manager and the City Clerk of the City are authorized and directed to prepare and furnish to bond counsel and the Underwriter certified copies of all proceedings and records of the City relating to the Bonds, and such other affidavits and certificates as may be required to. show the facts relating to the legality of the Bonds as such facts appear from the books and records in the officers' custody and control or as otherwise known to them; and all- such certified copies, certificates and affidavits, including any heretofore furnished, shall constitute representations of the City as to the truth of all statements contained therein. ' 2.10. The Mayor and the City Manager of the City, are hereby authorized to execute such additional agreements, documents and certificates in. connection with the Bonds, the refunding or redemption of the Prior Bonds or the assignment of security documents to Freddie Mac or others as may be necessary and appropriate in their opinion and in the opinion of the City Attorney and consistent with the Act. Copies of such additional agreements, documents and certificates, when executed, shall be delivered, filed and recorded as provided therein. 2.11. The approvals hereby given to the various documents referred to above includes approval of such additional details therein as may be necessary and appropriate and such modifications thereof, deletions therefrom and additions thereto as may be approved by the City Attorney and by the Mayor and the City Manager authorized herein to execute said documents prior to their execution; and the Mayor and the City Manager are hereby authorized to approve said changes on behalf of the City. The execution of any instrument by the appropriate officer or officers of the City herein authorized shall be conclusive evidence of the approval of such documents in accordance with the terms hereof. In the absence of the Mayor or the City Manager, the approvals authorized by this resolution to be given and the documents authorized by this resolution to be executed may be given or executed by the Acting Mayor or the Assistant City Manager. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina on this 16th day of November, 1999. Mayor Attest: City Clerk Motion seconded by Mayor Maetzold. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold Resolution adopted. Page 17 Minutes/Edina City Council/November 16,1999 CLAIMS'PAID Motion made by Member Johnson approving payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated November 10, 1999, and consisting of 30 pages: General Fund $316,376.82; Communications $19,149.25; Working Capital $13,446.28; Art Center $8,277.76, Golf Dome Fund $3,292.97; Swimming Pool Fund $5,041.72; Golf Course Fund $22,775.88; Ice Arena Fund $20,442.61; Edinborough/Centennial Lakes $21,180.76; Utility Fund $44,278.62, Storm Sewer Utility Fund $3,034.45; Recycling Program $35,092.44; Liquor Dispensary Fund $273,520.22; Construction Fund $410,178.01;' Park Bond Fund $940.13; TOTAL $1,197,027.92 and for confirmation of payment of claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated November 4,1999, and consisting of 4 pages: General Fund $620,448.75; Working Capital $71.53, Art Center $2,402.01; Golf Dome Fund $1,264.22, Swimming Pool Fund $1,370.62; Golf Course Fund $6,750.16; Ice Arena Fund $17,916.97, Edinborough/Centennial Lakes $18,163.42; Utility Fund $35,329.15; Storm Sewer Utility Fund $427.06, Liquor Dispensary Fund $73,368.40; Construction Fund $254,853.45, TOTAL: $1,032,365.74. Member Faust seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Johnson, Kelly, Maetzold Motion carried. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Maetzold adjourned the Council Meeting at 8:25 P.M. City Clerk Page 18 less REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL AND Agenda Item II.A. HRA From: GORDON L. HUGHES Consent ❑ CITY MANAGER Information Only ❑ Date: DECEMBER 79 1999 Mgr. Recommends ® To HRA ® To Council Subject: GRANDVIEW AREA El Motion REDEVELOPMENT PLAN ® Resolution AMENDMENT El Ordinance ElDiscussion RECOMMENDATION: Adopt attached Resolutions. INFO/BACKGROUND: On December 7, 1999, the HRA and the City Council will conduct public hearings with respect to the amendment to the Grandview Area Redevelopment Plan and the Grandview Tax Increment Financing Plan. The amendments are recommended to facilitate the redevelopment of properties located south of Eden Avenue pursuant to the plans developed by Opus Construction and Ron Clark Construction. Attached is a. copy of the proposed amendments which include a budget for acquisition of property and other improvements and expenses relative to this project. These amendments also provide the necessary authority for the HRA to pursue the acquisition of privately held properties which will be included in the redevelopment. In accordance with State Law, a copy of the proposed Amendments to the Redevelopment Plan and Tax Increment Finance Plan have been provided to Hennepin County and Independent School District #273. At this writing, no comments have been received from either jurisdiction. Staff recommends approval of the proposed amendments. RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO GRANDVIEW REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1, GRANDVIEW AREA, REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND GRANDVIEW TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN AND REQUESTING THE APPROVAL OF THE CITY COUNCIL BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Commissioners (the "Board ") of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "HRA "), as follows: 1. Proposed Amendment. The HRA and the City of Edina (the "City") have approved a redevelopment plan, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.002, subdivision 16, designated as the Grandview Area Redevelopment Plan (the "Redevelopment Plan "), and a redevelopment project to be undertaken pursuant thereto, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.002, subdivision 14 designated as Grandview Redevelopment Project No. 1 (the "Redevelopment Project "), and that in order to finance the public redevelopment costs to be incurred by the HRA and City in connection with the Redevelopment Plan and the Redevelopment Project, the HRA and City have approved a tax increment financing plan, pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, designated as Grandview Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "Financing Plan "), which establishes a tax increment financing district, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subdivision 9, designated by the HRA as Grandview Tax Increment Financing District (Hennepin County No. 1202) (the "District "). On April 7, 1997, the HRA and City approved an amendment to the Redevelopment Plan, Redevelopment Project and Financing Plan (the "1997 Amendment "). It has been proposed that the HRA approve amendments to the Redevelopment Project, Redevelopment Plan and Financing Plan, as amended by the 1997 Amendment, which is entitled "Amendments to Grandview Redevelopment Project No. 1, Grandview Area Redevelopment Plan and Grandview Tax Increment Financing Plan" (the "1999 Amendment "). The 1999 Amendment authorizes the acquisition and redevelopment by the HRA of property in the area subject to the Redevelopment Plan and the additional expenditures of tax increment revenues derived from the District to pay public redevelopment costs of the acquisition and redevelopment of such property by the HRA or another party, including costs of a public library and senior center and to pay administrative expenses of the HRA and City. 2. Approval of 1999 Amendment. The 1999 Amendment has been presented to this Board and is ordered placed on file in the office of the Executive Director of the HRA, and the Amendment is hereby approved. The 1999 Amendment further serves the original goals and objectives of the City and HRA in approving the Redevelopment Plan, the Redevelopment Project and the Financing Plan and the 1997 Amendment, by redeveloping property in the City in order to prevent or reduce blight, blighting factors and the causes of blight, and by providing needed public facilities. 3. Presentation to Cily Council. The 1999 Amendment hereby approved shall be presented to the City Council for a public hearing thereon pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.029, subdivision 6 and Section 469.175, subdivision 4. Attest: Executive Director -1- Chairman RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO GRANDVIEW REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1, GRANDVIEW AREA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND GRANDVIEW TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN AND MAKING FINDINGS WITH RESPECT THERETO BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota as follows: 1. The Commissioners of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "HRA ") and the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "City "), have previously approved the Grandview Area Redevelopment Plan (the "Redevelopment Plan") and Grandview Redevelopment Project No. 1 (the "Redevelopment Project ") to be undertaken pursuant thereto, and in order to finance the public redevelopment costs to be incurred by the City and the HRA in connection with the Redevelopment Plan and Redevelopment Project, the HRA and the City have approved Grandview Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "Financing Plan "), which establishes a tax increment financing district which is designated by the HRA as the Grandview Tax Increment Financing District (Hennepin County No. 1202) (the "District "). On April 7, 1997, the HRA and City, approved an amendment to the Redevelopment Plan, Redevelopment Project and Financing Plan (the "1997 Amendment ")'. The HRA has approved an amendment to the Redevelopment Project, the Redevelopment Plan and the Tax Increment Financing Plan, as amended by the 1997 Amendment, which is entitled "Amendments to Grandview Redevelopment Project No. 1, Grandview Area Redevelopment Plan and Grandview Tax Increment Financing Plan" (the "1999 Amendment "). The 1999 Amendment authorizes the acquisition and redevelopment by the HRA of the property in the area subject to the Redevelopment Plan and the additional expenditures of tax increment revenues derived from the District to pay public redevelopment costs of the acquisition and redevelopment of such property by the HRA or another party, including costs of a public library and senior center, and to pay administrative expenses of the HRA and City. 2. This Council on December 7, 1999, held a public hearing on the 1999 Amendment after notice of the public hearing was published in the official newspaper of the City not less than ten (10) days prior to the date of the hearing. At such public hearing all persons desiring to be heard with respect to the 1999 Amendment were given an opportunity.to express their views with respect thereto. 3. This Council has previously found that the District is a redevelopment district within the scope of Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subdivision 10 and the Amendment will not change such prior findings. The 1999 Amendment further serves the original goals and objectives of the City and HRA in approving the Redevelopment -1- Plan, the Redevelopment Project and the Financing Plan and the 1997 Amendment, by redeveloping property in the City in order to prevent or reduce blight, blighting factors and the causes of blight, and by providing needed public facilities. 4. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, subdivision 4, it is hereby found that: (A) The District, is a redevelopment district, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subdivision 10, for the reasons set forth in previous findings by this Council, and the 1999 Amendment does not alter these previous findings. (B) The proposed development to be undertaken in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan, as amended by the 1999 Amendment, in the opinion of this Council would not occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and therefor the use of tax increment financing is deemed necessary. (C) The Financing Plan, as amended by the 1999 Amendment, conforms to the general plan for the development of the City as a whole. (D) The Financing Plan, as amended by the 1999 Amendment, will afford maximum opportunity consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole for the development of the area subject to Redevelopment Plan by private enterprise. (E) The City confirms its election of the method of tax increment computation set forth in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, subdivision 3, clause (a) with respect to the District. Passed by the Council this 7th day of December, 1999. Attest: Debra A. Mangen -2- Dennis F. Maetzold AMENDMENTS TO GRANDVIEW REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1, GRANDVIEW AREA REDEVELOPMENT PLAN AND GRANDVIEW TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN THE HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA APPROVED DECEMBER 7, 1999 -1- I. INTRODUCTION The Commissioners of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority in and for the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "HRA ") and the City of Edina, Minnesota (the "City "), have previously approved a Redevelopment Plan designated as Grandview Area Redevelopment Plan (the "Redevelopment Plan"), and have approved Redevelopment Project No. 1 (the "Redevelopment Project ") to be undertaken pursuant thereto. In order to finance the public redevelopment costs to be incurred by the City and the HRA in connection with the Redevelopment Plan and the Redevelopment Project, the HRA and the City have approved a tax increment financing plan designated as the Grandview Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "Financing Plan") which establishes a tax increment financing district designated as Grandview Tax Increment Financing District (Hennepin County No. 1202) (the "District "). On April 7, 1997, the HRA and City approved amendments to the Redevelopment Plan, Redevelopment Project and Financing Plan (the "1997 Amendments "). Certain property in the area subject to the Redevelopment Plan has not as yet been redeveloped in a manner which meets the objectives and purposes of the Redevelopment Plan. In order to provide for the redevelopment of such property in a manner which meets the objectives and purposes of the Redevelopment Plan it may be necessary for the HRA to provide financial or other assistance. Such property consists of the Lewis Engineering site, the Kunz Oil (Parts Plus) site, the Edina School District bus storage facility, the TAGS building located at 5201 Eden Circle and the building located at 5244 Eden Circle, the Edina Pet Hospital building located at 5237 Eden Avenue, the Classic Hair Design building located at 5241 Eden Avenue and the building located at 5149 Eden Avenue and are identified as Parcels S, T, U, V, X, Y, Z, AA, CC, 00, RR, SS, TT, and UU in Exhibit A to the Financing Plan (the "Redevelopment Property"). By the 1997 Amendment the HRA was authorized to acquire and redevelop a portion of the Redevelopment Property and to expend tax increment revenues derived from the District for public redevelopment costs incurred by the City or HRA in connection with the acquisition and redevelopment of the Redevelopment Property by the HRA or another party. Pursuant to such authorization the HRA has acquired a portion of the Redevelopment Property. By this Amendment, the Commissioners of the HRA authorize the HRA to acquire the balance of the Redevelopment Property identified in Exhibit A to the Financing Plan and to redevelop the Redevelopment Property including the construction of a new public library and a senior center and to expend tax increment revenues derived from the District for public redevelopment costs incurred by the City or HRA in connection with the acquisition and redevelopment of the Redevelopment Property by the HRA or another party and the construction of a new public library and senior center. This Amendment is approved by the Commissioners of the HRA and the City pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 469.028 and Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, subdivision 4. U. STATEMENT OF NEED AND OBJECTIVES The acquisition of the Redevelopment Property will aid in the redevelopment of the Redevelopment Property in a manner beneficial to the residents of the City and consistent -1- with the goals and objectives of the HRA as stated in the Redevelopment Project and Redevelopment Plan will provide needed public facilities, which will meet the needs specified in Redevelopment Project and Redevelopment Plan. III. AMENDMENT TO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT A. Description of Project. The amendment to Redevelopment Project consists of (i) the acquisition and redevelopment by the HRA or another party of all or a portion of the Redevelopment Property not previously acquired by the HRA, (ii) the construction by the HRA, the City or another party on the Redevelopment Property of a public library and senior center and (iii) other public redevelopment costs incurred in connection with the redevelopment of the Redevelopment Property. B. Conditions of Blight. The Redevelopment Property is blighted by virtue of the location of buildings thereon which (i) are structurally substandard because they contain defects in structural elements or a combination of deficiencies in essential utilities and facilities, including, access to public sewer and water, light and ventilation, fire protection including adequate egress, layout and conditions of interior partitions, or similar factors, which defects or deficiencies are or sufficient total significance to justify substantial renovation or clearance, and/or (ii) require substantial renovation or clearance in order to remove such existing conditions as incompatible uses or land use relationships, overcrowding of buildings on the land and obsolete buildings not suitable for improvement or conversion. However, the Redevelopment Property is potentially useful and valuable for redevelopment which would contribute to the general health, safety and welfare of the residents of the City. The Redevelopment Property will not be reasonably available for redevelopment by private enterprise, or redeveloped by private enterprise, in the foreseeable future, unless the blighting conditions thereof are removed. The City and the HRA can remove, or cause or encourage other parties to remove, such blighting conditions, and to redevelop the Redevelopment Property by jointly exercising the powers conferred upon them by law for this purpose. IV. ADDITIONAL EXPENDITURE OF TAX INCREMENT Additional expenditures of tax increment authorized by this Amendment include costs associated with the acquisition of all or a-portion of the Redevelopment Property by the HRA or another party and the demolition or rehabilitation of the existing buildings located thereon, the construction of a new public library and a senior center and site development and other public redevelopment costs associated redevelopment activities related to the Redevelopment Property. While the adoption of this Amendment authorizes such acquisition and redevelopment and the expenditure of tax increment in connection therewith, it does not obligate the City or HRA to acquire any of the Redevelopment Property to construct the public library or senior center or to make expenditures with respect thereto. The estimated additional expenditures of tax increment related to the acquisition and redevelopment of the Redevelopment Property not previously authorized by the HRA pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan and Financing Plan as previously approved and amended -2- (exclusive of interest on any bonds or other obligations issued by the City or HRA to finance such expenditures) are as follows: Acquisition of Property $ 3,100,000 Construction of library 2,860,000 Construction of senior center 2,145,000 Parking and Site Improvement 3,940,000 Demolition 500,000 Financing costs 175,000 Offsite Improvements 500,000 Administration 500.000 $13,720,000 Contingency 10% 1 1.372,000 TOTAL $15,092,000 The use of tax increment derived from the District to pay the costs described above is hereby authorized. Such authorization is in addition to costs authorized to be financed with tax increment derived from the District authorized by the Financing Plan and by the 1997 Amendment. The expenditures hereby authorized may be paid directly from tax increment derived from the District, or may be paid indirectly from tax increment derived from the District, by the payment of debt service on bonds or other obligations issued by the City or HRA the proceeds of which are to be used to pay such costs. Any such bonds, obligations will be repaid, with interest, from the tax increment derived from the District. V. FISCAL AND ECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS OF ADDITIONAL EXPENDITURES It is estimated fiscal and economic implications of the additional expenditures of tax increment revenue derived from the District authorized by this Amendment will be as follows: The local governmental units other than the City which are authorized by law to levy ad valorem property taxes in the area where the District is located are Independent School District No. 273, Hennepin County, the HRA, and various metropolitan area authorities, -3- including the Metropolitan Council, the Metropolitan Transit Commission, the Metropolitan Airports Commission and the Metropolitan Mosquito Control District (the local government units). After the establishment and during the continuation of the District, as a result of the Redevelopment Project and the implementation of the Redevelopment Plan and the improvements of property in the District, there has been an increase in the tax capacity of the taxable property in the District. If the tax increments derived from the District are not applied to pay the additional expenditures described herein, the District would terminate earlier than would otherwise be the case assuming ad valorem taxes are paid with respect to the taxable property in the District in the anticipated amounts. Upon such termination such increased tax capacity would be available for taxation by the local governmental units. However, as a result of this Amendment such increase in tax capacity will not be available for taxation by the local governmental units until a later date. However, as a result of amendments to the Redevelopment Project contained in this Amendment the HRA reasonably expects that there will be an increase in the tax capacity of parcels in the District. Because the type of development to be constructed on the Redevelopment Property has not been determined the HRA is unable at this time to estimate the impact of such increase in tax capacity on the life of the District. VI. DETERMINATIONS IN ORIGINAL FINANCING PLAN The determinations made in the Financing Plan with respect to designation of the District as a Redevelopment District, the impact of the establishment of the District and the implementation of the Redevelopment Plan and undertaking of the Redevelopment Project and the captured tax capacity of the District upon the redevelopment thereof are not affected by this Amendment and such determinations remain in full force and effect following the adoption of this Amendment. VII. ADDITIONAL AMENDMENTS TO PLAN The City and the HRA reserve the right to further amend or modify the Redevelopment Project, the Redevelopment Plan and the Financing Plan by their joint action, subject to the provisions of state law regulating such action. VIII. ORIGINAL PROJECT AND PLANS The Redevelopment Project, the Redevelopment Plan and the Financing Plan, except to the extent provisions thereof have previously been explicitly amended or supplemented and are explicitly amended or supplemented by this Amendment shall remain in and be in full force and effect. Ga The Project Area includes the 52 following described parcels in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota: Quarter] Parcel I.D. Section Rance Township Quarter Sect. Parcel A 28 117 21 31 0017 B 28 117 21 31 0021 C 28 117 21 31 0022 D 28 117 21 31 0028 E 28 117. 21 31 0029 F 28 117 21 31 0030 G 28 117 21 31 0031 H 28 117 21 31 0032 28 117 21 31 0043 J 28 117 21 31 0044 K 28 117 21 31 0046 L 28 117 21 31 0047 M 28 117 21 31 0048 N 28 117 21 31 0051 O 28 117 21 31 0053 P 28 117 21 31 0054 Q 28 117 21 31 0055 R 28 117 21 33 0018 S 28 117 21 34 0002 T 28 117 21 34 0004 U 28 117 21 34 0005 V 28 117 21 34 0011 W 28 117 21 34 0017 X 28 117 21 34 0018 Y 28 117 21 34 0019 Z 28 117 21 34 0020 AA 28 117 21 34 0022 B B 28 117 21 34 0025 CC 28 117 21 34 0026 Exhibit A Continued �J Quarter/ Parcel I.D. Section Range Township Quarter Section Parcel DD 28 117 21 31 0007 EE 28 117 21 31 0014 FF 28 117 21 31 0015 GG 28 117 21 31 0016 H 28 117 21 31 0027 11 28 117 21 31 0002 JJ 28 117 21 31 0003 K K 28 117 21 31 0033 LL 28 117 21 32 0013 MM 28 117 21 32 0014 NN 28 117 21 33 0004 00 28 117 21 33 0007 PP QQ 28 28 117 117 21 21 33 33 0009 0017 RR 28 117 21 33 0031 5S 28 117 21 33 0032 TT 28 117 21 33 0033 U 28 117 21 34 0021 VV 28 117 21 34 0016 WW 28 117 21 34 0024 XX 28 117 21 31 0004 YY 28 117 21 31 0045 z 28 117 21 31 0049 �J AGENDA ITEM: II.A. Hennep in County E- = An Equal Opportunity Employer December 1, 1999 Gordon L. Hughes Edina HRA Executive Director 4801 West 50'" Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 Re: Edina Proposed Amendment to Redevelopment Plans and Tax increment Financing Plans Grandview Tax Increment Financing District No. 1202 Dear Gordon: Enclosed is a report from Sandra Vargas, Hennepin County Administrator, to the Hennepin County Board, concerning the Edina Proposed Amendment to Redevelopment Plans and Tax increment Financing Plans, Grandview Tax Increment Financing District No. 1202 Please arrange to have the report entered into the record of the public hearing of the Edina City Council on Tuesday, December 7, 1999, to reflect the input of Hennepin County, as provided by Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subd. 2. If you have any questions about this information, please call me at 348 - 5076. Sincerely, Jean M. Bierbaum, Senior Administrative Assistant Financial Analysis and Support Division JMB.jb RevuEdinaamendmenftifl202l2799V rransmiffalLefter Taxpayer Services Department A -600 Hennepin County Government Center Recycled Paper Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487 -0060 M-1 Board of Commissioners Vargas, County Administrator. Subject Edina Amendment to Grandview Redevelopment TIF District No. 1202 Hearing: Tuesday, December 7,1999, at 7:00 p.m. at the Edina City Hall. HISTORY Edina created the Grandview Tax Increment Financing District No. 1202 in 1984 with an original projection of $4,500,000 of tax increment The TIF District has generated $7,081,942 from 1985 through 1999. The TIF District Plan was amended in 1997 but was not geographically enlarged. The amendment provided for acquisition of certain property west of State Highway 100 and south of 52n0 Street West A portion of that property has been acquired for redevelopment PROPOSAL The current proposal amends the TIF District budget to authorize the expenditure of up to an additional $15,092,000 of tax increment to acquire the balance of the redevelopment property and to redevelop it with, among other amenities, a new Hennepin County public library and a senior center and to pay administrative costs. Minnesota Statutes 469.176, Subd. 4g has prohibited use of tax increment"... for the acquisition, construction, renovation, operation, or maintenance of a building to be used primarily and regularly for conducting the business of a municipality, county, school district, or any other local unit of government or the state or federal government.." The provision was amended in 1999 to further prohibit use of tax increment "...for a commons area used as a public park, or a facility used for social, recreational, or conference purposes." However, the amended provisions do not apply to 1) expenditures made before January 1, 2000, 2) expenditures made for binding contracts entered into before January 1, 2000, or 3) expenditures made under a binding contract pursuant to a letter of intent with the developer or contractor if the letter of intent was entered into before January 1, 2000. Therefore, if identified as social or recreational facilities, the public library and senior center components may be permitted uses of tax increment if the TIF Plan Amendment is approved and one of the three conditions listed in this paragraph is enacted before January 1, 2000. Continued... December 1, 1999 Board of Commissioners Edina Amendment to Grandview Redevelopment TIF District No. 1202 Page 2 TAX INCREMENT REVENUE AND EXPENDITURES The amendment does not extend the life of the TIF District, which will be decertified after generating 26 years of tax increment on December 31, 2010. The proposed additional expenditure authorization is as follows: USE OF FUNDS Acquisition of Property $ 3,100,000 Construction of library 2,860,000 Construction of senior center 21145,000 Parking and Site Improvement 3,940,000 Demolition 500,000 Financing Costs 175,000 Offsite Improvements 500,000 Administration 500,000 Contingency 10% 1.372.000 Total Authorized Expenditures $15,092,000 FISCAL IMPACT If Hennepin County's share/contribution is 32% of the annual tax increment of $1,372,00 over the remaining 11 year life of the TIF District, it will be $439,043 annually or $4.8M. However, the amended Plan does allocate $2,860,000 for a new Hennepin County library. SUMMARY Hennepin County's $4.829M share/contribution to the tax increment generated can be balanced against the extent to which the proposed $2,860,000 of tax increment allocated for a new Hennepin County library coincides with County goals. As of the date of this review, the Hennepin County Five Year Capital Improvements budget does not include a new library in Edina. The proposal does not provide details but the budget does allocate $2,145,000 for construction of a senior center and $3,940,000 for public parking and site improvements. This amendment proposal does not coincide with the criteria established by the Hennepin County Board for use of tax increment financing as identified in Hennepin County TIF Policy No. 92- 10- 917R1, adopted October 27, 1992. However, to the extent that the use of tax increment from the Grandview TIF District No. 1202 to provide funding of $2,860,000 for a new Hennepin County library, $2,145,000 for a Senior Center and $3,940,000 for public parking meets the goals of the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners, this proposal can be supported by Hennepin County. A copy of this report will be sent to the City of Edina with a request that it be entered into the public record of the Edina public hearing on Tuesday, December 7, 1999, to reflect the county's position on this proposal. ( RevuEdinaamendmenttifl202l2799V) m O, REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: Kris Aaker Assistant Planner Date: December 7, 1999 Subject: B- 99 -63. 7122 Valley View Road. A 37 foot frontyard setback variance. L. & E. Yamnick Recommendation: Agenda Item: III. A. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ® Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Uphold the Zoning Board of Appeals denial for a 37 foot frontyard setback variance for a frontyard garage location. Info /Background: On September 16, 1999, the Zoning Board of Appeals heard and tabled Lyubov and Eduard Yamnick's variance request from the frontyard setback requirements to allow opportunity for redesign of their plan to locate a garage in the frontyard. The Yamnick's would like to accomplish an in- ground garage fronting Valley View Road. The garage door opening would be flush with an existing retaining wall and would be the only visible part of the garage. The homeowners returned to the Zoning Board on November 18, 1999, with no change in plan. The Zoning Board denied the requested variance. Approval of the requested frontyard setback variance would confirm the ability to accomplish an additional curb cut along Valley View Road to access the property which would be contrary to City policy for collector streets. • Letter of Appeals • Meeting Minutes • Staff Report DRAFT MINUTES ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS NOVEMBER 18, 1999 B -99 -63 Lyubov and Eduard Yamnick 7133 Valley View Road Lot 3, Block 1, Muir Woods 2 "d Addition Request: A 37 foot frontyard setback variance Ms. Aaker informed the Board Mr. and Mrs. Yamnick appeared before the Zoning Board on September 16, 1999, at that time the Board tabled their requested for a 37 foot frontyard setback variance. Ms. Aaker explained the City is obligated to act upon an application if no request for withdrawal has been received. Mr. and Mrs. Yamnick have requested to appear before the Board at this time, and have indicated there are no changes to the plans. Ms. Aaker concluded staff recommends that the Zoning Board deny the request (B- 99 -63) for a frontyard garage location. The proponents, Mr. and Mrs. Yamnick were present to respond to questions. With graphics Ms. Aaker presented plans to the Board of the variance requested by Mr. and Mrs. Yamnick. Mr. Hardy said as he understands the request the proponents desire to add a third garage stall to the front of their property. He pointed out the property has been developed with a two car garage, which is required by City Ordinance. Mr. Hardy said it may be difficult to find a hardship in this situation, and that is what the Board needs to consider. Mr. Lewis commented he has sat on the Zoning Board for a number of years and cannot remember ever approving a variance that would allow a one stall garage to be constructed in the frontyard setback area. Mr. Hardy interjected as he views the plans presented by staff the garage appears to be a "hole" cut into the retaining wall with a garage door. He questioned if an engineer reviewed the garage plans. Ms. Aaker said the Engineering Department reviewed the request for an additional curb cut on Valley view Road, and indicated it has no problem with a second curb cut. The Engineering Department did not comment on the proposed garage structure. Ms. McClelland stated she cannot support the request as presented. She said in her opinion this site may not be able to be developed to support a third garage stall. Ms McClelland moved denial of the variance noting no hardship exists, the property meets Ordinance requirements which requires that each property be constructed with a two car garage, and the additional concern of creating a dangerous situation by allowing vehicles to back out onto Valley View Road. Mr. Workinger seconded the motion. Mr. Workinger said in his opinion there is no hardship present. He added one can argue the steep terrain is a hardship, but in the immediate area there are many many homes with similar driveways. Mr. Workinger also noted Mr. and Mrs. Yamnick have a two car garage which meets code. Mr. Workinger concluded he is also concerned with the safety issue mentioned by Ms. McClelland. It is dangerous to back up on to Valley View Road. Mr. Hardy asked the proponents if they have room to park three vehicles on the site. Mrs. Yamnick responded there is room for three vehicles. Mrs. Yamnick requested to address the Board. Mr. Yamnick presented a photo display of the property. Mrs. Yamnick told the Board their present situation is very dangerous especially in the winter months. Mrs. Yamnick said soon they will have four cars, and she is very concerned with the safety of her children as they exit the property. Mr. Lewis stated in his opinion the proposal may be even more dangerous. He pointed out presently vehicles access Valley View Road front first. If the garage were approved one would have to back out onto Valley View Road. Mrs. Yamnick said it may be possible to turn - around in the new garage to access Valley view Road front first. Mr. Hardy asked the proponents the age of their home. Mrs. Yamnick said their home is 20 years old, and they recently purchased it from an elderly man. Mr. Hardy told Mr. and Mrs. Yamnick there are mechanical adjustments that can be made to the present driveway to keep it dry and free from snow and ice during winter months. Mr. Hardy concluded in his opinion there is no hardship. Mr. Yamnick told the Board Valley View Road has changed in 20 years. He said 20 years ago when the house was constructed Valley View Road was a lightly traveled road, now it is very busy with travelers trying to avoid the ramp meters. Ms. McClelland explained if the Board were to approve this variance it would be setting a precedent which would allow residents with similar situations to request a frontyard setback variance. She added when reviewing proposals the Board not only studies the present request, it considers the impact approval would have on the neighborhood. Mr. Yamnick reiterated traffic flow has increased over the years and in that location Valley View Road is dangerous. Mrs. Yamnick added all they desire is a garage located on Valley View Road that can be used during winter months when ice and snow are on the existing driveway. Mr. Lewis asked for a vote on the motion. All members voted aye; motion to deny carried 4 -0. November 22, 1999 Jackie Hoogenakker Zoning Board of Appeals City Hall 4801 West 50'h Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 I wish to appeal the decision of the Zoning Board of Appeals to the Edina City Council on my recent request variance B- 99 -63. I also wish to have written answer with reason why it has been denied. Sincerely, Lyubov and Eduard Yamnik 7133 Valley View Rd Edina, MN 55439 City of Edina November 19, 1999 Lyubov and Eduard Yamnik 7133-Valley View Road Edina, MN 55439 Re: B- 99 -63, A 37 foot frontyard setback variance for Lot 3, Block 1, Muir Woods 2nd Addition Dear Mr. and Mrs. Yamnik: In connection with your recent request for the above referenced variance, which was heard by the Zoning Board of Appeals on November 18, 1999, may we advise you that same has been denied. If you wish to appeal the decision of the Zoning Board of Appeals to the Edina City Council, a letter of intent must be submitted to the City Clerk no later than November 28, 1999. If you have further questions on this matter, please contact me at 826 -0369. Sincerely, Jackie Hoogenakker Zoning Board of Appeals Pit City Hall (612) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 826 -0379 Kris P. Aaker Phone 612 826 -0369 4801 West 50`h Street Fax 612 826 -0390 Edina, MN 55424 Memo To: Members of the Zoning Board of Appeals From: Kris, Aaker, Assistant Planner CC: File Date: November 10, 1999 Re: B- 98 -63, 7133 Valley View Road A 37 foot frontyard setback variance Attached are minutes of the Zoning Board of Appeals September 16, 1999, meeting. The Zoning Board tabled the above mentioned request to allow opportunity for redesign. The homeowners have been contacted a number of times regarding their application however, have not responded. The City is obligated to act upon an application if no request for withdrawal has been received. Staff recommends the Zoning Board deny request B -99-63 for a frontyard garage location. • Page 1 1. The setback r uirement from the lake when the house was constru ted in 1956 was 50 feet. Chang in the city code now require a 75 foot setback. T push the house forward 25 feet to eet code would interfere with the neighbors a lines. 2. A stairway between subject property and the property to th est would have to be rerouted. 3. The shared driveway wit\eproperty to the east (65% of ich is on the subject property) would be compnterfering with the nei bor's access to their home, and 4. A large oak tree on the everal smaller tree n the property would be lost. Ms. Repya concluded staff believNi that the h dships identified by the proponent are well founded. In 1992, the Minnesota epartm t of Natural Resources mandated an amendment to the setback requirements fro la s, ponds and streams. That action required the minimum rear yard setback to b\nfrom sed from 50 to 75 feet. Had this plan been reviewed prior to 1992, the setback var the lake would not have been required. It is apparent that the pr/presented. n was deve ed with sensitivity to not only the subject property, but to the surrroperties as w %rre f recommends approval of the variance request subject to The proponents, Mr. and t were presenand to questi ons. Chairman Johnson a ed the proponents if there are cros easements over the driveways. Mr. Dent said ere are no cross easements. Chain Johnson suggested that the proponent enter to a cross easement agreement with his %thae or. A brief discus on ensued with Board Members in agreemen setback from the lake will not negatively impact the adjoining properties. Mr. Lewi moved variance approval subject to the plans presented, use of matching materials sug sting recording cross easements over the driveways. Mr. Workinger seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. B -99 -63 Lyubov and Eduard Yammick `( �7133 Valley View Road O•�\\\ Lot 3, Block 1, Muir Woods 2 "d Addition Z Request: A 37 foot frontyard setback variance Ms. Repya informed the Board the proponents wish to construct a new garage within the required front street setback area. The existing house provides a 37 foot setback. The required setback for any new structure on the lot is 47 feet. The proposed garage would provide a 10 foot setback. Thus, a 37 foot front street setback variance is requested. Ms. Repya explained the subject property is characterized by steep slopes and is heavily wooded. Extensive use of retaining walls was necessary to develop the property. The homeowners are proposing to construct a garage which would be cut through the lower retaining wall beneath the existing drive way. Due to the existing vegetation it is difficult to see this wall during the summer months. Ms. Repya concluded staff finds it difficult to support the variance request. The property currently has a two car garage with generous parking or turn, around area. Some lots, due to topographic conditions, have less development potential than flat lots. The current wild and wooded condition is typical of the Indian Hills area. Development of the garage would significantly alter this condition to the detriment of the area. Since the property now meets code with respect to garage stalls no hardship is present. Staff recommends denial of the variance request. The proponents, Mr. and Mrs. Yammick were present to respond to questions. Mrs. Yammick addressed the Board and told them the request for the proposed new garage is for safety reasons. She explained in the winter the driveway develops a sheet of ice over it making it dangerous to navigate out of the driveway onto Valley View Road. She said in her opinion it is a very dangerous situation. Continuing, Mrs. Yammick informed the Board last winter her son had an accident exiting the driveway and hit a tree. Concluding, Mrs. Yammick told the board how important it is to them to have a safe place to park vehicles during winter months. Mr. Lewis asked Ms. Repya if the City's engineering department has reviewed the proposed plans. Ms. Repya said the engineering department indicated they would permit another curb cut, adding they did not comment on the construction of the proposed garage. Mr. Workinger asked the proponents how they will access the garage to get to their vehicle. Mrs. Yammick responded they do not know the answer to that question at this time. She commentedlthey may have to walk down the driveway to the garage. Mr. Workinger said in his opinion the proposed plan violates the frontyard setback area, adding with the plans submitted it is impossible to tell how the garage will work with the rest of the property. Mr. Workinger commented that in his opinion an engineer should look at the plan to ensure the proposed garage built into the retaining wall is safe. He concluded at this time he cannot support the variance request as presented. Mrs. Yammick stressed the current driveway situation is very dangerous, adding something needs to be done to eliminate the danger during winter month. Mr. Workinger pointed out that the dangerous situation still exists if the "upper" garage is used during winter months. Mrs. Yammick told the Board they have a four -wheel drive vehicle that can access the existing garage during winter months, but their sons car is not four -wheel drive. Mrs. Yammick pointed out the existing garage can be used during most of the year. Mr. Lewis told the Board he also has a concern with water run off from the existing driveway above. Mr. Lewis added he also has a question concerning the length of the proposed driveway, and if it meets code. Mr. Lewis concluded in his opinion more information is needed, he noted the subject site already has a two stall garage. Ms. Repya explained the proposed driveway cannot legally accommodate vehicle parking. If a vehicle is parked on the proposed driveway it would violate ordinance setbacks for parking. Chairman Johnson told the proponents it appears Board Members are having a difficult time with the proposal as submitted. Chairman Johnson told the proponents the Board can vote the request either up or down, and if the request is denied the denial can be appealed to the City Council. Chairman Johnson also explained the proposal can be tabled or withdrawn. Chairman Johnson suggested redesign with input from an engineer. Mrs. Yammick told Board Members she cannot understand why they do not see the safety issue. Chairman Johnson said Board Members do understand your concern, but the request to locate a garage in a retaining wall entirely in the frontyard setback area is difficult to envision. Continuing, Chairman Johnson said the Board still is not sure how the garage will be accessed from the home above. Ile added if one has to walk down the entire length of the driveway to gain access to the proposed lower garage that can pose a dangerous situation also. Mrs. Yammick reiterated this situation is dangerous for her family, and their safety is of utmost importance. Mr. Lewis suggested the possibility of redesigning the present driveway, or heating it Mr. Workinger said in his opinion there is not enough information to make a decision. He pointed out the plans presented are not detailed, other options have not been addressed, concluding at this time he cannot make an educated decision or support the proposal before the Board. Mrs. Yammick interjected they have looked at different design plans, adding they believe this is the only plan that will work. Chairman Johnson told the proponents they can request that this issue be re- heard, and by the same Board Mr. Lewis suggested to Mr. and Mrs. Yammick that they could bring their request before the Traffic Safety Committee, and that committee may have some ideas on how to resolve the driveway issue. Mr. Lewis pointed out there are many homes within this area that have steep long driveways. Continuing, Mr. Lewis said from his point of view not enough information has been provided. He said he would like to see more detailed plans, a plan that indicates how the proposed garage will be accessed from the house, photos, and alternative options. Commissioner Workinger agreed. Commissioner Workinger moved to recommend denial of the proposed variance. Chairman Johnson explained to the proponents if the variance is denied they can appeal the decision of the Board to the City Council, or they can request tabling the request allowing them time to provide more detailed plans. Mr. and Mrs. Yammick told the Board they would like to table their request at this time, and come back to the same board in the near future. Mr. Workinger withdrew his motion. B -99 -64 Greg Nelson 120 Hansen Road \se 1, Birchcrest 4th Request: sideyard setback vari ce and a 1.5 foot front k variance to constr ct a garage addition The subject property is located on ke west side Hansen Road consisting of a two story home with an attached 20 X 22' oaragk The ho owner is proposing to add a 12 foot addition to the garage which currently ma three foot sideyard that would be provided with sideyard setback variance. Furthermore, the e feet short of the average setbacks for the adjac would simply continue the non - conforming fron variance is required. sins 15.25 foot sideyard setback. The ddition necessitates a 1.75 foot s g frontyard setback of 31 feet is 1.25 mes. Even though the addition ands back, a 1.25 foot frontyard setback The homeowner has indicated tha hen they purchas \inwo home they assumed it had a two car garage, however, due to ireplace chase butt feet into the north wall of the garage they can not park two c inside and still open oors. Currently a boat and trailer a)& parked next to the garage alo the south wall and a wooden shed sits behind the gar ge. The homeowners have indica d that the proposed addition would elimina the need for the shed on the prope and the boat could no longer be lega/tion along the side of the garage. The proposed ga will provide a usable two car garage wi additional room to store items whireviously been stored next to the garage and an abutting storage shed. Staff believes a benefit of the proposed garage addition to the subject pro rty as well as the neighbo ood justifies the 1.75 foot sideyard setback variance and the 1. foot frontyard setback ariance requests, thus, staff recommends approval subject to the following conditions: LOCATION MAP -3 "WC, CC N d O r 0 0 z =Yo .A u� u� o_ W min + ,. BALLPARK COMPLEX,>r VARIANCE 5T. W 'AT HO I CF 0 \`I NUMBER B -99 -63 LOCATION 7133 Valley View Road REQUEST A 37 foot frontyard setback variance EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT EDINA ZONING BOARD SEPTEMBER 16, 1999 STAFF REPORT B -99 -63 Lyubov and Eduard Yamnick 7133 Valley View Road Lot 3, Block 1, Muir Woods 2nd Addition Request: A 37 foot frontyard setback variance The proponents wish to construct a new garage within the required front street setback area. The existing house provides a 37 foot setback. The required setback for any new structure on the lot is 47 feet. The proposed garage would provide a 10 foot setback. Thus, a 37 foot front street setback variance is requested. The subject property is characterized by steep slopes and is heavily wooded. Extensive use of retaining walls was necessary to develop the property. The homeowners are proposing to construct a garage which would be cut through the lower retaining wall beneath the existing drive way. Due to the existing vegetation it is difficult to see this wall during the summer months. RECOMMENDATION Staff finds it difficult to support the variance request. The property currently has a two car garage with generous parking or turn around area. Some lots, due to topographic conditions, have less development potential than flat lots. The current wild and wooded condition is typical of the Indian Hills area. Development of the garage would significantly alter this condition to the detriment of the area. Since the property now meets code with respect to garage stalls no hardship is present. Staff recommends denial of the variance request. Q e r 0 •lam jees PLANNING DEPARTMENT CASE NUMBER -qC1 -(a= DATE oI FEE PAID �O Planning Department 4801 West Fiftieth Street * Edina, MN 55424 * (612) 927 -8861 -------------------------------------- APPLICATION FOR: VARIANCE /FEE RES. $150/NON -RES. $250 APPLICANT: NAME: ADDRESS: y /J 3 /i- eez)L 4/PHONE: PROPERTY OWNER: NAME: ADDRESS: �t,PG�`' A/ PHONE: 9y3 9� fv LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: "01, air, 41 ow. PROPERTY ADDRESS: PRESENT ZONING: P.I.D.# EXPLANATION OF REQUEST: ARCHITECT: NAME: SURVEYOR: NAME: Owner's Signature (Date) pages u necessary PHONE: PHONE: Applicant's Signature (Date) ySee tb p4y Application .... page 2 Minnesota statutes and Edina ordinances require that the following conditions must be satisfied affirmatively. The proposed variance will: (If yes, please explain. Use additional sheets if necessary.) YES NO a) Relieve an undue hardship which was �( not self - imposed or a mere inconvenience. T� b ) Correct extraordinary circumstances applicable to this property, but not applicable to other property in the vicinity -or zoning district. C) Preserve a substantial property right possessed by other property 'in the vicinity and zoning district. d) Not be materially detrimental-to the public ..welfare or injurious to other property in the vicinity or zoning district. Our house is on 7133 Valley View Rd. Lot shape is irregular and our drive way is parallel to the house and Valley View Rd so we have to have parking lot or we can call it place where cars can turn around to get in garage. The existing driveway is 12" higher then Valley View Rd on slope with retaining wall. We would like to build an additional driveway on it level with V. V.Rd , but 90 degrees to existing retaining wall, take part of this wall put garage door, take ground of our parking place, and build garage from blocks. Garage is going be under a turn around place and roof of garage has to be on same level with the turn- around and it is going be part existing turn- around place. So basically the change is going to be additional driveway and part of our retaining wall will be replaced with the garage door Our retaining wall is built from wood and it is 20 years old and it has to be replaced anyway. We would like to point out second driveway going be big, big help during winter. And we have 3 people in the households who are driving. Next year our younger son will have a car. Now we have a 2 -car garage and four vehicles. A4. NOW VALLEY VIEW ED. 4,C r,411VIAId r r AFTER REMODELING VALLEY VIEW RD. "FAM 4 1, ­4o irk 63%, irtil I % .71 1. J sil .10 -K •74 i All, rr • � -- .� �R� � � •:i e ` t'�?•, �l�. ' 1f�T'3,if� •.':' �} • .,� � �..:;�Rj�, .. - i ;,.: !F�: �� -� �� ! �'�1 ;y�-` � � /�':d °•J,. ��1: �.� �i• ZE . t+ t" ` fir: � .f ' t. •i� � - . 7 '. •1��T ~'w.b.�iii'�t►e•tt, *``.,•' C�.,` -T`•1 "art, ; ~•�i',�. lt•;!,+e• _:j:.1 r'�, ,• 'lei •'L"� '� "' ., }�J�."+ , ,p�irr�•p`e�i���fj%�o '` _��`�.,Cir.�U *i `7.`�iy��,• ., • "i /a,L%.1�',r •' ^7.'b1 ♦t }• •!�r�Soa`•L� " +• e.�! ti.F'' ,� 21 •ter /....n i 1 � ��A tR ' .jT 1 \p '� ��; P� !�,,.q�a�2' �� �,; � �.,.:... �, • � <► 1, y � • s:�� y,�,' �cpA •...:rt�,�.� g� I v , "R•A ♦i�r •'' Ow /T• as �., t'�A .{S ��• "� apt , ,� ttli �y ;� °;1 •?may '►.1i.►l�� 11 �d �r .�� v� r �� -o.�. vo '. �t M � ♦' ,/mac,... • I•. r~ �•.• , •�. . -T � . { , ` .-- �r�M+i ,�,'• : ' •'i v e . �ii.'�' ►-� � ./ �i. ��..�•`'�•�5�= 'il��' \��Y �d � °� �7�, � � ..' • rf ' � � 1. +,7:� �P ��� � �iS. ��7� ®`• �•��I�. � , � -.i' a "�• � i' w`tT•��;vfi'� �� '�• F: tit t'i'�t� =�7 �j► �7 .r v•j.t�. + ;. t C. +Or�'\► "n�,w`�i�1 i r• f '�TVI;'+ t(ij' i'• i't�! ,"(h.•^ aTT% {' • K �5 • , JA '� t+ �� ..,�• � '. r-� l d a+: ", �Y S' `! '� • \tip 2'i. �y • � 'Y� aJ, 't�•�'� �. •p - a� � . �1t y. IR�. � `.�.� \-a ''�� ��:I. "� Di R�j�• is�.`'•1�'�a''i�Q+� ��"�i/�l�l .,��.�,� t' •�• .,, Y.. H�•'� ,!J�i ` y�.{��,(�Rr •�..f •..� •,,,.�:_;r^�� � .�� ';�.:� !e, �: y . �d��j': •• • t ♦' a ;* `1-'.� Y�.-•�weS.�'a\� ,� �. _.�t� r.1, , l\ 1 •i�11S� +i1f1 9� ,f i�E� a 1 -' �' -• �r•At� iV.f a+�L .a _.✓i.7' : a "t . •1i'{:w�a`t ♦ !yi�•= �y���j.7,, !" •,�j• �e }� ' • ;1 1� }jI �'r.� •..` 1 ►� •.KSP a.•.f -wily y 7'v. �t•,.� a:;•, rr • �• l p L is o�1 . A'. f let+ • a .- ,�1 �: ^�. a•¢W A•�� t�e. `'��y.. a�'°= S.l"�'t�'a.:�•8�'' ya j•,�,Z..'V'�ti'� `f�� a `,�iY,:yy • Jt" Y _;V", : �"'1 __._ a. :e _• t• � .�1 �' 1sy�►',� '�M"► � 4.���a!?�!?�r. '1t,p.• ;3� .s- ► a d•• �; ti. :. � -TT t ♦ � 1�4 ti• i•' by + ., • �r•if'w•�w' a '� { A� ''l�,yyyy, l •!rC ^p 11� *..•� ^ \l`C •��t� l �+A•• i'jf�Ai,- ry r ,t'{ �\• �' ,X t la•_ �ilr► \\ 1 , 0.`° R ".:v i• ..t� w� �►1 �:4j " *�. at ! • {I�~ i, '} •+ i i t Z t \} x . {'�i i �• t. ) !. •� . + -A,•V T•i1 1 G'•4 q ' is, ^rj, \ }�i.' 'ail,. \,_� tJ. • •h �r-` • ^ „y ! �5 ..•` i •`� „' � A-w• ~ e � •�•f C 1A •�lw,! 1 •l � ,�•'� ��{.�. OIL '�'F ••' •, •`t' (� 1 r ! �., I.i't\ �, a!` , ',a 11 �•'- �'. e: ,'1 14 _ ;. a ♦: . \ a •�>r + �... ' ''1, � �' � .✓ - ♦J �'- i••��::♦ 1 �y •,r,l i .., . �! 1C°�',. G. e ' '�`• '' � •• $ � a r) ��; � etY, t _ r ti _y 3.,e ?�4 4 .�1 �. r .f '.• a t �..._ . w 1;�;a aa,ti ��, j 1.ahi��, ,.• .� a •s..t. . ,. �•Y ±. - .+ ._ s � '+� y �,,. � x%! ,rwi'•T+Tr 1 �'':•• • � t K 1'• '•e @ .;� ``+r.. • •' t! ; e% L { � „T�- �,'•} � t �� "` '•�1 }, 1,( •1 •i :i ��'�' .�i ?I 1� '. - � �e e Il.i[�.., �^ 4• I 1? j_ •. e. ;'Ek i L t Q .,! �' 1� + �? +?ate � ' %� `• {! , ?yf. i � + �•, If ��.i•,S •:r .� rte~ :.:_1.�� '� `�i��;1Y,f���`j2'�. ��;!' '� :�r�r?`, •f t`e� ?�,.(' i Cry � e, a�r.4 ^ . _. : • , � % ,t • "t is � ,,\ % r.r •.^•►+ 1 � • i t, '+ 1 e� ' e ' ..•� �- �r- �•ti�l•;r,::Aew \t'� +v .. .,� � e '� — � -y:._. ,'. Ryy1�!` \, a �` - \ " ' t 'l • . +ylr- Aar • .�� � �ir `� i , `'r ,t 1e�M`'` '� .:'\ � ! .... _..., ' .,� -\ . •"'t- ,4. . � A � • r. '. �.,,: .' .mot \ . t `''�...,.y..�: • i� t.� 4 1.4 `�� •-+` '� .�? .s .. �" , ^•..r"� t "� `aM }Gy.. ..'.e. al ,..� at iu v c-y !'cif `1 •. � +�.� F�,j•• .�f}- �•\r�= 4�h' Ilt�iwiiy�{',�a,. �� ��r �A•^ 3 r+ i1 :• -�• � 441i' •..� •�t'�•e. Y.,'.'1� � � •- �.-v�`•, aty`iL `� �• �Ii ` t'•a� � •��• � • �,, "Y +,yam Y�a+e�ij� "i"+:.� 5 .�.+' 'M•S w''! .J >- •..�' •✓ �' r.�'y�'1...��.,I,ia• .. c t 't a., t � r a:r,,- .ria��t SS � sJ:1i'G '4'•^ k�K `n- .•�`>, �•-'✓•• t e•{,. .I yt .. . ^ +.,S ^a�7 1I +• "►. -i_ "d ^�. _,::i� ' - - �• „ yF :". .u.: Oct �a,`nn s• a \a �. y t�.�' a S•_ .•z �3.� S. v �'a � L�,4r p •a . ,y, �� 0. a � 9 vim. ..yav1�. •! a``��. tP „`' ry9'' v ►�"+ �,.".�,,, e �•: i51w +fi r'�„, vi 4 +'� i - e 1 i' 1 • •.t �•'a -+1�, "',� - - _'...•,._.e,.`.• v -. � '.•• }r r•irp I•a• i ••et ��. a r I _ 1 .. :, t�� . . -. r;. • •^ -..... rci•.ye,•„ .c • _ . e ,e• • � �a•'rr' .t df a • ' • i w- } • � t ( ` i, s. t . �, t ,mow! �3R7:'4ti ^i•yw- .r,...�,'� rot„ � ,�l a ..`'b �j"t+•p�' + ., .. .• � ��.. ttup al -. • '` + ` ` ■'. M. �P- •2M01ILIA i[• 111►I_M',W_1 010, 11 Ilk[tm9l:2: Draft Minutes P.C. Meeting December 1, 1999 LD -99 -4 Grace Church Brad Bakke 5300 France Avenue South Edina, MN Mr. Larsen informed the Commission Grace Church is requesting trading an easement for a small alteration in the property line adjacent to the church. Mr. Larsen concluded staff supports the lot division as requested. Chairman Johnson asked Mr. Larsen if Grace Church is moving from Edina to a new facility in Eden Prairie. Mr. Larsen said that is correct, in the near future Grace Church will be moving from Edina, and before the church moves it would like to "clean up" this property line issue. Chairman Johnson asked if this alteration can be transferred privately. Mr. Larsen said it can, but the City prefers to have a "clean" plat. After approval the division will be recorded with the County. Commissioner Runyan moved lot division approval. Commissioner Byron seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 1, 1999 STAFF REPORT LD -99 -4 Grace Church Brad Bakke 5300 France Avenue South Edina, MN I Grace Church is requesting trading an easement for a small alteration in the property line adjacent to the church. Staff supports the lot division as requested. ---i V EST -52 N D R _ - -�6 299.00 P IY N :i 7 r 3-17 �I J j[} L. \/ 1 • � 1 T r i—GJ i \/l 1 L_IJ 1 W n' 0 1 nr b 1_-J T NuTH Lm "wT M- L_ r/ 1 c `-0. A - a .W a L a _ e 1 A 111�A P 1 � I I L— I I 4 1 I Jam— I I ~ 1 SURVEY FOR: GRACE CHURCH OF MINNESOTA, INC. la.lr ral ra u..0 rbtoc brM. m..rvr rr..�rrd..Iro..n rr.•r ar.vY TS..O..r.+ 9M1 W Odl r�bTr M.L.�oa4 bb pbrdsOrd wW Yb�srYC Pl.ers.Y bYe�. �O. Y].bO• Y 'odr�e.�br�e. .®ad•� M��M.m v.b d Orr W vT r.al ��y�Ta � " rrM+rd�Orr wmi b rdr d rtrn �°'�� �xrrt Ca1T..C� P va Lot I 1� N i_ 11 i I N89.49b W 293.48 - N �QO I 1 1,• 1. • I �0 0 W .D 9 / I I . m n 8>�6 A B –Wgf 54T -H-- �; €ET° — A A R O "mbam"IYII. Mm9 LYIDAYYBTII4 QL k L 4 Sunde land 5"W"YonD lnr- .I.lrwsrrw�..--- dWla.s rvb.b9rwsb e. so d.l.lrbrbsum mradbl�lafi N ®r.�4/rM�.r I I drs d W Lr S b bbOeO am d W la b r r Tds dOVldic �0 Y �1e31. arm �vam�. 'r rr�b�.rY��q..�r�'dOGrd.odrr .m I 1 y `bb �Y�nrgar. ,. dYdYbrprmp.q rd uu�I .I ._. it =Oaa.. b4l.ebOd�6tbb0.1- Ibga.rr�m..e.r W 1.V 11 ... ft MIS •a. 8T. _ u i v b..= P va Lot I 1� N i_ 11 i I N89.49b W 293.48 - N �QO I 1 1,• 1. • I �0 0 W .D 9 / I I . m n 8>�6 A B –Wgf 54T -H-- �; €ET° — A A R O "mbam"IYII. Mm9 LYIDAYYBTII4 QL k L 4 Sunde land 5"W"YonD lnr- AGENDA ITEM: III.C. December 2,1999 Attention ...Edina City Council I do not know why you had council meetings regarding the proposed shopping center. It is apparant that it is a CUT AND DRY deal in favor of the shopping center. You heard valid reasons in opposition but they went in one ear and out with you. You were just there to put on a show. You were elected to represent us but it appears that you were representing the shopping center. I want to thank the member of the council that spoke against the center. Why don't you witness the traffic problems during the early morning and evening hours on Lincoln Dr.and the cars that take short cuts to avoid 169.Your study you made on the day of the holiday was not a valid study. And may I say,you better keep up with the enviroment aspect because it is beginning to be an unhealthy situation..If you want to beathe those exhaust fumes it is your perogative but we as residents want to live healthy lives. Election time will prove if you are right in your decision. We/have b resident of Edina since 1964.... MV. an Mrs ((Larry�WMosow 6877 Langford Drive Edina, o e JOBS TO: FROM: VIA: SUBJECT: DATE: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Mayor Maetzold and Members of the City Council John Keprios, Director of Parks and Recreation Gordon Hughes, City Manager REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 December 1, 1999 ITEM DESCRIPTION: GMC %2 Ton Sierra Pick -up Truck - Company 1. Falls Automotive, Inc. 2. 3. (State Bid Contract #421925) 4. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Falls Automotive, Inc. $20,247.00 plus sales AGENDA ITEM IV. A. Park Maintenance Department Amount of Quote or Bid 1. $20,247.00 2. 3. 4. 5. Account #: 0650 -4901 GENERAL INFORMATION: This is for purchase of a new 2 -wheel drive extended cab '/z ton GMC model pick -up truck with a short box, V8 engine and dark green color. This truck replaces a 1992 4 -wheel drive %2 ton Ford extended cab pick -up (truck #47.280), which will be sold at the Hennepin County auction in April. The new GMC pick -up is covered under the equipment replacement budget. The State of Minnesota solicits bids throughout the state for a number of goods purchased by governments each year. In other words, the State of Minnesota has secured for us the lowest competitive bid . possible for the purchase of this truck. Edina Park and Recreation John K Ovros, Director Department This Recommended bid is within budget not within budget , J �W #in,/'inance Director Gordon HughesXity Manager 01 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor Maetzold and Members of the City Council FROM: John Keprios, Director of Parks and Recreatio VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15.000 DATE: November 18, 1999 AGENDA ITEM: IV. B. ITEM DESCRIPTION: 20 Electric Golf Cars - Braemar Golf Course Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. E -Z -Go Textron 1. $47,900.00 2. Versatile Vehicles, Inc. 2. $51,000.00 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Account # 0027 -1340 E -Z -Go Textron $47,900.00 (plus 6.5% sales tax) GENERAL INFORMATION: This is for purchase of 20 electric golf cars for Braemar Golf Course and Fred Richards Golf Course. The price of $47,900 includes a trade -in value of $24,000 for twenty 1995 E -Z -Go electric golf cars with tops. Sealed bids were opened in the Council Chambers on November 18, 1999, at 11:00 a.m. The fleet of 80 golf cars are on a five year replacement cycle. The golf course has $50,000 in its equipment replacement budget for golf car replacements this year. John Ke 9,Director This Recommended bid is within budget not wit] Edina Park and Recreation Department 0 7-4 0 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # V.A. From: Francis J. Hoffman Consent ❑ Director of Public Information Only ❑ Date: 7 December, 1999 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Freeway Noise Mitigation Action ❑ Motion Study Presentation ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ® Discussion Recommendation: Receive Report and separate petition from neighborhood. No action required. Info /Background: City Staff, SRF Consulting Group, Inc., and the volunteer committees are submitting the study completed during 1999 regarding freeway noise issues. The report is in response to a Council directive in late 1998. ° Staff has mailed the attached memorandum and executive summary to over eight hundred homes announcing the presentation of the information in the document. The consultant, staff and members of the volunteer committee will provide input at this meeting. 135 volunteers participated in the development of these strategies. The report identifies ten strategies to assist in development of City policy on this issue. Currently, the City has no policies within the current comprehensive plan regarding this issue. Ultimately, policies could be developed and used in a manner similar to specialty areas, such as the groundwater plan, stormwater management plan, water supply plan, etc. The interest in developing different strategies ranges from very interested to no interest or total opposition to the ideas. Report/Recommendation Agenda Item V.A. Page Two These concepts are more plausible than ten years ago when the City initially attempted a metropolitan effort through the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities (AMM). Noise issues were thought to be Mn /DOT's problem and responsibility to solve. Currently more people have realized that a localized cooperative effort will be needed to accomplish some of these strategies. Staff has been consistently indicating that no current policy or funds are available for immediate initiation of these strategies. Staff would recommend review of the report over the next few weeks with concept of developing policy for use on freeway noise mitigation. ° in A. ill oke City of Edina, Minnesota CITY COUNCIL -�� 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 •'�spr'''` (612) 927 -8861 • (612) 927 - 7645 -FAX • (612) 927 - 5461 -TDD PETITION TO THE.QTY.C.OUNCIL". ❑ SIDEWALK ❑ •STORM ,..SEWER ❑ ALLEY PAVING ❑ SANITARY SEWER ❑' CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ❑ PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER DATE: 2 /Yo✓ 79 ❑ WATERMAIN ❑ STREET LIGHTING ` HER:- . To the Mayor and City Council: The persons who have signed this - petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the locations listed below. W.67— IV W /O O between 44 =1T and so a7IY .rio LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS between and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT' BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS between LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS F= ADDRESS' between LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ' ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT,_ THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF' THESE IMPROVEMENTS'AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE OWNER'S NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNER'S (PRINTED) PHONE A'oBFRT ly FiE`� x¢60 ¢ C.9.fCAOE 44/ 920 - ' 6 oC }• f��a�� �r i� W Coca1 e I�P,brGt L . S.Qe l 1 may► y�0g Cas Bade, Ln. q 20- 2590 �pt -fg�l /✓� ��tcCM� '� �� is pettion was circulated by: NAME ADDRESS PHONE There is space for more signatures on the back or you may attach extra pages. SEPTEMBER 1990 PROPERTY SIGNATURE OWNER'S NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNER'S (PRINTED) PHONE 13p,occ- 1REN ,o?S 4 So 1 �1oP -TIC PVE 3T, tr'NI?T5 -g501 IV01qJ14 Aft eiRl- 0068 , zz yop M - n' `f�aSNo dS Y5ao PatricL &robai 0 4401 Worth Abe_ 925- 3375 Anna Lom�brde 4401 Netfh Ave. 425 - .S37S Pftit7 RUNyAN o b N0824 NVE °129 =10 64 7 AVZ:;Nf=Y RUN NvAN 1°We ng -10847 eve.. y� e-`r��0 -6Z �6 �� s e*'z le -5z/ Y1 &Sc -, k2q4-e g2-2rgIDU SC 14 pr-Lo TT c li iesA Atgo iA dAsc AD c L oy gash - 76-6" ho�r� -�•1 ya9 g���i 1� 16scrr-, qto 1 &tacJ "I � P� %�/t G Sc.�lcZ/Lt;/'tX17 5100( pM,. .& Avo RoZD —Sl6 Qz5 6 &x- � G 7 '' cf0i c It oe dl i ahs: -: o%er 50 10 M o o,re- &k gi 15 - 7 LI FS SASa� �cD�bN£lrcC -� SO)o tgbojec fq✓�L- `7 1S -1 534 S- 13p,occ- 1REN ,o?S 4 So 1 �1oP -TIC PVE 3T, tr'NI?T5 -g501 IV01qJ14 Aft eiRl- 0068 , zz yop M - n' `f�aSNo dS Y5ao PatricL &robai 0 4401 Worth Abe_ 925- 3375 Anna Lom�brde 4401 Netfh Ave. 425 - .S37S Pftit7 RUNyAN o b N0824 NVE °129 =10 64 7 AVZ:;Nf=Y RUN NvAN 1°We ng -10847 eve.. y� e-`r��0 -6Z �6 �� s e*'z le -5z/ Y1 &Sc -, k2q4-e g2-2rgIDU 22 November, 1999 (Neighborhood 100P request of the City of Edina) Sound and Visual Barrier Wall on HW100 (100P) Objective: To Improve the quality of life and market values for houses west of HW100 between 44th Street continuing south across the Minnehaha Creek. To accomplish this by reducing the traffic noise and visual traffic on HW100 for houses in the adjacent area. _ Proposed Options: Plan A. To install a 12' sound wall in conjunction with the repair and resurfacing of HW100 during the summer of 2000. This will provide both sound and visual barriers and will improve the aesthetics with appropriate landscaping and plantings. Plan B. To install an 8' visual barrier wall in conjunction with the repair and resurfacing of HW100 during the summer of 2000. This will only provide a visual barrier for automobiles and not for trucks. It will be aesthetically pleasing but will provide limited sound abatement. Background. In 1995, to assure optimal use of investments in highway noise mitigation, the State Legislature directed the state Commissioner of Transportation to cant' out a state wide noise abatement study to identify areas where noise levels exceed standards and to develop a priority list for directing state resources in noise mitigation. The "Minnesota Highway Noise Abatement Study" that was undertaken by Mn /DOT in cooperation with the MPCA conducted noise monitoring at 811 residential areas adjacent to freeways and expressways in incorporated areas in Minnesota. The Mn /DOT study, printed in 1997, rated the 811 areas based on the average noise levels experienced and their residential density. Cost effectiveness considerations were then factored into the analysis to rank the order of constructing noise walls. Although 571 of the 811 residential areas had daytime noise levels above Minnesota's noise standards, only 54 of the areas were cited as top priority for future noise mitigation improvements: The area designated "100P" on a subsequent °Freeway Noise Study" prepared for the City of Edina by the SRF Consulting Group, Inc., was ranked by the state 2 as the 61st in priority within the 811 areas just falling short of the state top priority ranking. In November of 1998, Francis J. Hoffman, P.E., Director of Public Works and City Engineer for Edina, initiated a study at the behest of the Edina City Council for noise mitigation in neighborhoods along highways in the City. A survey of over 850 households along Edina's highways was initiated. Area 1 of the survey, including the residential area designated 100P, expressed the greatest concern about the noise levels of all areas in Edina surveyed. Area 1 also expressed the, highest level of "willingness to pay" for noise abatement improvements. The final draft of the "Freeway poise Study" prepared for the City of Edina dated October, 1999, designated our neighborhood, west of HW100 between 44th Street proceeding Jertouth across Minnehaha Creek as "1001R." The study included estimates of the costs of constructing both an 8' visual barrier wall and alternatively a 12' sound barrier wall. The City Noise Study Committee is currently in the process of reviewing the final draft of the Freeway Noise Study with the intention of presenting it to the City Council With recommendations for adoption on 7 or 21 December, 1999. It is our neighborhood's desire to support the recommendations and to ask the City Council to proceed with the authorization of funding for a noise wall for the 106P area of the Edina plan. Cost of Options: Plan A. To install a 12' sound wall in conjunction with the repair and resurfacing of HW100 during the summer of 2000. Based on a cost estimate of $180 /lineal foot for 990' plus 15% for engineering design, the cost is $204,930. An offset of $19,800 may be obtained from the HW100 resurfacing budget by not replacing the planed chain link fence expense and applying those funds toward a sound wall. This would result in an anticipated completed cost of $185.13 0 for the 100P section. Plan B. To install an 8' visual barrier wall in conjunction with the repair and resurfacing of HW100 during the summer of 2000. Based on a cost estimate of $80 /lineal foot for 990' plus 15% for engineering design, the cost is $91,080. An offset of $19,800 may be obtained from the HW100 resurfacing budget by not replacing the planed chain link fence expense and applying those funds toward a sound wall. This would result in an anticipated completed cost of $71.28 0 for the 100P section. 3 Funding Options: The Edina Freeway Noise Study recommendation for funding of the noise abatement is based on a cost - sharing policy. The suggested sharing. is: • 50 percent state /federal funding • 25 percent city (general city funds) • 25 percent neighborhood (special assessments, private funds, in -kind contributions) Over 90% of the neighbors within the 100P section who have decided, concur with the funding recommendations of the study. So far, 22 of the 26 housing units have verbally agreed to proposed assessments based on 25 %'bf the costs as a special assessment for the installation of a 12' sound wall. 2 have not yet decided their position.. In addition, there is a strong willingness to discuss the acceptance of a 50% special assessment on the neighborhood conditional upon it's reduction to 25% when any state or federal funding is obtained for noise abatement within the City of Edina. Neighborhood Assessment Options: Two neighborhood assessment options were discussed within the neighborhood. One based on an assessment only of the housing units adjacent to the highway, and the other based on the nearby neighbors that will also benefit from a sound and visual barrier wall. 1. Adjacent housing unit assessment option. (9 properties) Plan A. 12' wall. $185,130 x 25% = $46,280 / 9 = $5,140./ housing unit. Plan B. 8' wall. $71,280 x 25% = $17,820 / 9 = $1,980 / housing unit 2. Adjacent and nearby neighbors assessment option (26 properties) Plan A. 12' wall. $155,130 x 25% = $46,280 1St row housing units (9) assessed at 60% - $3,500 / housing unit. 2nd row housing units (4) assessed at 30% - $1,750 / housing unit. 3 and 4th row housing units (13) assessed at 10% - $600 / housing unit. Plan A. 8' wall. $71,280 x 25% = $17,820 1" row housing units (9) assessed at 60% - $1,350 / housing unit. 2nd row housing units (4) assessed at 30% - $675 / housing unit. 3'd and 4th row housing units (13) assessed at 10% - $225 / housing unit. 4 Neighborhood Recommendation: The overwhelming majority of the 26 neighbors in the 100P section of HW100 support the installation of Plan A. A 12' sound wall and the assessment of all 26 of the neighbors for funding of 25% of the costs. This is based on the completion of a sound wall on the West Side of HW100 running from the north edge of 44th Street to the southern edge of the Minnehaha Creek with the assessments being prorated over the housing units. The neighborhood cost allocation is based on 60% for the 1st row, 30% for the 2nd row and 10% on the remaining properties bounded by HW100, 44th Street and the Minnehaha Creek. There was very little interest in Plan B, only putting in an 8' visual barrier. We are looking forward to a long awaited sound wall to improve the quality of life in our neighborhood and request that the City Council move forward with the planning. Respectfully submitted, The 100P Adhoc Sound Abatement Neighborhood Committee. mfr iOdVNt7 WAL - $IHAVN w/ rte L/NF_ • 1416WAY )©c; L! [1 AvE u [1 d p � A I] -AVE m 4 � IMINNEAAHA GRO P.K RM jI d or BR1A�lE NORTH IOC- 1IE-MAPC., f't1+N rn/iMrSN Wes" <f4it15T � MINN�I-}RHA GR�K Ch►ar��cv.� November, 1999 Mr. Dennis Maetzold, Mayor City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Maetzold: We the undersigned, residents in the:100P neighborhood as defined in the Edina Freeway Noise Study, wish to support continuing the development of a sound and visual barrier wall for our neighborhood. We understand that until a specific development project is undertaken and the projected costs and sources of funding are established, there will not be a firm bases for holding hearings to approve or disapprove any special assessments. We also understand that future public hearings will be conducted before plans to proceed are finalized. We support in principle the installation of a 12' sound wall and the assessment of all 26 neighbors for funding of 25% of the costs. This is based on the completion of a sound wall on the west side of HW100 running from the north edge of 44th Street to the southern edge of the Minnehaha Creek and the inclusive highway. The proposed neighborhood cost assessment allocation is based on 60% for the 151 row of houses, 30% for the 2 "d row of houses and 10% on the remaining properties bounded by HW100, 44th Street and the Minnehaha Creek. Our support is consistent with "The 100P Adhoc Sound Abatement Neighborhood Committee" proposal dated 22 November, 1999. We are looking forward to the development of a long awaited sound wall to improve the quality of life in our neighborhood and request that the City Council move forward with your planning. Sincerely, (n� Ci a/m� e) V 9- C�"�t --aC. (address) (telephone) ,!Z&,4J 622 X21 Z (date) (name) November, 1999 Mr. Dennis Maetzold, Mayor City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Maetzold: I the undersigned, .� resident in the 100P neighborhood as defined in the Edina y. Freeway Noise Study, wish to support continuing the development of a sound and visual barrier wall for our neighborhood. I understand that until a specific development project is undertaken and the projected costs and sources of funding are established, there will not be a firm bases for holding hearings to approve or disapprove any special assessments. I also understand that future public hearings will be conducted before plans to proceed are finalized. I support in principle the installation of a 12' sound wall and the assessment of all 26 neighbors for funding of 25% of the costs. This is based on the completion of a sound wall on the west side of HW100 running from the north edge of 44th Street to the southern edge of the Minnehaha Creek and the inclusive highway. The proposed neighborhood cost assessment allocation is based on 60% for the 1 It row of houses, 30% for the 2nd row of houses and 10% on the remaining properties bounded by HW100, 44th Street and the Minnehaha Creek. My support is consistent with "The 100P Adhoc Sound Abatement Neighborhood Committee" proposal dated 22 November, 1999. I am looking forward to the development of a long awaited sound wall to improve the quality of life in our neighborhood and request that the City Council move forward with your planning. Sincerely, ( me) 14 .61( Ca.56 Qd7f Z -1L&o AA- A-; �Sro (address) �I Z R Z,22- Z �L- (telephone) (date) November, 1999 Mr. Dennis Maetzold, Mayor City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Maetzold: I the undersigned, a. resident in the 100P neighborhood as defined in the Edina Freeway Noise Study, wish to support continuing the development of a sound and visual barrier wall for our neighborhood. I understand that until a specific development project is undertaken and the projected costs and sources of funding are established, there will not be a firm bases for holding hearings to approve or disapprove any special assessments. I also understand that future public hearings will be conducted before plans to proceed are finalized. I support in principle the installation of a 12' sound wall and the assessment of all 26 neighbors for funding of 25% of the costs. This is based on the completion of a sound wall on the west side of HW100 running from the north edge of 44th Street to the southern edge of the Minnehaha Creek and the inclusive highway. The proposed neighborhood cost assessment allocation is based on 60% for the 1 st row of houses, 30% for the 2nd row of houses and 10% on the remaining properties bounded by HW100, 44th Street and the Minnehaha Creek. My support is consistent with "The 100P Adhoc Sound Abatement Neighborhood Committee" proposal dated 22 November, 1999. 1 am looking forward to the development of a long awaited sound wall to improve the quality of life in our neighborhood and request that the City Council move forward with your planning. Sincerely, rii11 /� /T I L,. 1/ G!j Loy ,• lyi - lr MI (telephone) � 123 (date) November, 1999 Mr. Dennis Maetzold, Mayor City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Maetzold: We the undersigned, residents in the 1 OOP neighborhood as defined in the Edina Freeway Noise Study, wish to support continuing the development of a sound and visual barrier wall for our neighborhood. We understand that until a specific development project is undertaken and the projected costs and sources of funding are established, there will not be a firm bases for holding hearings to approve or disapprove any special assessments. We also understand that future public hearings will be conducted before plans to proceed are finalized. We support in principle the installation of a 12' sound wall and the assessment of all 26 neighbors for funding of 25% of the costs. This is based on the completion of a sound wall on the west side of HW100 running from the north edge of 44th Street to the southern edge of the Minnehaha Creek and the inclusive highway. The proposed neighborhood cost assessment allocation is based on 60% for the 1st row of houses, 30% for the 2nd row of houses and 10% on the remaining properties bounded by HW100, 44th Street and the Minnehaha Creek. Our support is consistent with "The 100P Adhoc Sound Abatement Neighborhood Committee" proposal dated 22 November, 1999. We are looking forward to the development of a long awaited sound wall to improve the quality of life in our neighborhood and request that the City Council move forward with your planning. Sincerely, GLIS- (name) (address) %&--Svo / (telephone) 11-3o-610 (date) (name) A- November, 1999 Mr. Dennis Maetzold, Mayor City of Edina 4801 West 5e Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Maetzold: I the undersigned, a resident in the 100P neighborhood as defined in the Edina Freeway Noise Study, wish to support continuing the development of a sound and visual barrier wall for our neighborhood. I understand that until a specific development project is undertaken and the projected costs and sources of funding are established, there will not be a firm bases for holding hearings to approve or disapprove any special assessments. I also understand that future public hearings will be conducted before plans to proceed are finalized. I support in principle the installation of a 12' sound wall and the assessment of all 26 neighbors for funding of 25% of the costs. This is based on the completion of a sound wall on the west side of HW100 running from the north edge of 44th Street to the southern edge of the Minnehaha Creek and the inclusive highway. The proposed neighborhood cost assessment allocation is based on 60% for the 111 row of houses, 30% for the 2 "d row of houses and 10% on the remaining properties bounded by HW100, 44"' Street and the Minnehaha Creek. My support is consistent with "The 100P Adhoc Sound Abatement Neighborhood Committee" proposal dated 22 November, 1999. 1 am looking forward to the development of a long awaited sound wall to improve the quality of life in our neighborhood and request that the City Council move forward with your planning. Sincerely, (name) (address) (telephone) (date) 100P Neighborhood residents: November, 1999 Address First Name First Name Last Name Tel. Number North Ave. 4401 Anna Patrick Lombardo 925 -3375 4425 Marit Orlyn Krin stad 925 -4500 4500 Suzi Jimmy Jahoda 922 -7024 4504 Priscilla JoAnn n/a Hawn 929 -9146 4508 Audry David Runyan 929 -0847 4521 Connie Jack Weston 920 -0139 920 -4424 4505 Sue Dezie Williamson 926 -5001 4501 Deb Bruce Berendts 927 -0068 Moore Ave. 5001 Diane Pete Scheremet 920 -5169 5005 Gretchen n/a Lofin 929 -4850 5004 Emmett Sue Bailey Seckinger 926 -8870 4912 Sunn side Rd. 5008 Winnie Lo Leo Lee 925 -5899 5010 Nicolette Jason Boedi heimer 915 -9485 Laura Ave. 4508 Charlotte DeJean Michael Croke 926 -9177 Cascade Lane 4600 n/a Bill Freeman 929 -4902 4601 Christy Ken Hanson 922 -2568 4605 Sonja Ron Un erman 920 -2175 4609 Beverly Lee Harness 929 -0819 4613 Jeanine Marshall Rosner 922 -9278 4617 Holly Paul Johnson 922 -1003 4612 Char Charlie Chiesa 929 -7565 4610 Elizabeth G. BiA Bailey Bailey 922 -7890, 889 -2731 Naples, Fla 4608 Deb Steve Spellman 920 -2560 4604 Carol Bob Fiedler 920 -8759 926 -9864 4602 -Rental Mary Richard Erickson 920 -0259 3823 Kipplinger Ave. 44 Street 5017 -5015 Terry Richard Recke 922 -6681 _v..,c r�T /TioN y 99 DATE: November 30, 1999 TO: Residents / Volunteers Cn N O FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Workq*L PO SUBJECT: Freeway Noise Mitigation Study %` lass Attached is the Executive Summary for the work developed by the City's consultant, SRF, Inc., and the volunteer committee. The Edina City Council will meet on December 7th at 7:00 PM to discuss the issues related to the document. A short update as to the funding issues. The bill that was in the Legislature did not survive the last cut on the final days. The bill provided funding from the State with the City doing cooperative projects with Mn /DOT /City funding. We need to push for another attempt next session. Also, the Legislature placed "levy limits" on the City which frankly prevent the City from establishing a capital improve- ment fund specifically geared to noise reduction /mitigation programs. The major purpose of this document is to provide the information as to what is desired from the neighborhood as to berms, fences, sound walls, etc. Also, it gives City Council something to use in developing legislation initiatives involving funding, and developing local policy. It will be very helpful if you can be at the December 7th City Council meeting to provide input to the Council. Our local expectations would include developing berms where we can use earth from other projects for the berms. Also, potentially setting up a special assessment district to help finance the landscaping portion with cooperative landscaping projects involving Mn /DOT landscaping funds. This will be discussed at the December 7th meeting. `r EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FREEWAY NOISE MITIGATION STUDY EDINA, MINNESOTA PREPARED FOR CITY OF EDINA PREPARED BY SRF CONSULTING GROUP, INC. NOVEMBER 1999 SRF No. 0983254 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Edina City Council directed the preparation of a noise impact study along TH 62, TH 100 and TH 169 in the fall of 1998. The Freeway Noise Mitigation Study addresses the technical and financial feasibility of constructing noise walls, other forms of noise abatement and visual screening. Potential funding sources are evaluated, and conceptual designs are presented. The study was developed with ongoing involvement of the affected residential neighborhoods over a period of approximately one year. The results of the Edina Freeway Noise Mitigation Study will be used to seek funding and to negotiate with Mn/DOT for the provision of freeway noise abatement along existing highways. SURVEY OF RESIDENTS Survey questionnaires were sent to 864 Edina residents living adjacent to or one house from TH 62, TH 100 and TH 169. Forty -nine (49) percent responded to the survey and 30 percent indicated they were interested in volunteering to serve on three neighborhood committees. Key findings of the survey are: • Respondents felt that freeway noise is approximately 4 on a scale of 5 with 0 being very quiet and 5 being very load. • Respondents felt that safety, noise levels, views beyond their yards, aesthetics and cost were important factors to consider. Noise was given a slightly higher rating than other factors. • Respondents indicated that they would be willing to spend an average of approximately $260 per year for ten years for visual screening or noise barriers. Individual responses ranged from zero to $1,000 or more. Three series' of neighborhood meetings were held in February, April and November to discuss noise related issues and develop recommendations for the City Council. TYPES OF BARRIERS The Edina Freeway Noise Mitigation Study focuses on noise walls, berms, fencing and landscaping. Examples and cross - sections of each of these types of barriers are provided. Noise levels can be reduced if the line of sight is broken between the source of the noise and the receptor of the noise. To be effective, noise mitigation generally requires high material mass and an unbroken barrier. Mn/DOT has established standards for noise walls that ensure a minimum 5- decibel noise reduction. Noise walls will cost approximately $15 per square foot ($120 per linear foot for an 8 -foot wall and $180 per linear foot for a 12- foot -high noise wall). Berms are a highly preferred form of noise mitigation, but require substantial land area. A 10- foot -high berm at a 3:1 slope (minimum for mowing) requires a width of approximately 70 feet. Therefore, berms cannot be provided along most areas of the three study corridors. Freeway Noise Mitigation Study - Executive Summary Edina, Minnesota r ' Berms can cost $200 or more per linear foot if constructed as a separate project. However, berms can often be constructed at low cost because construction projects often produce excess material that must be removed from the site and deposited elsewhere. Contractors can deposit this excess dirt in a proposed berm location at no extra cost to their project. While privacy fencing is typically not considered an effective means of noise mitigation, many residents on the neighborhood committees expressed an interest in using privacy fencing due to its lower cost and its appearance. A solid privacy fence costs approximately $10 per square foot for an 8- foot -high fence ($80 per linear foot). Noise monitoring was conducted at four locations in or near Edina to assess the effectiveness of privacy fencing compared to noise walls. Based on the monitoring results, the best performing visual barrier is located north of TH 62 east of Penn Avenue in Minneapolis. This barrier, which is constructed of noise wall materials, achieved a 5 -6 decibel reduction in noise. Other fencing achieved noise reductions of 0 -3 decibels. For some people, visual barriers may reduce the perception of noise, although a significant noise decrease may not be measurable. Landscaping is not an effective means of noise reduction unless the landscaping is coniferous (evergreens), approximately 100 feet in depth, with branches down to the ground and planted very close together so there are no gaps. However, due to aesthetic and screening benefits, neighborhood committee participants highly favored landscaping as a part of any noise mitigation strategy. FEASIBILITY OF NOISE BARRIERS Each freeway corridor (TH 62, TH 100 and TH 169) was evaluated for the potential for berms, noise walls and /or fencing. Consultant recommendations were reviewed with the neighborhood committees and revised to reflect neighborhood concerns and acceptability. Berms and landscaping are recommended wherever space is available, including areas where cul -de -sacs or frontage roads could be used as space for berming. Noise walls or fencing is recommended in all other locations except where not feasible (for example, bridges or cross - streets) or not desired by the neighborhood. FUNDING SOURCES There are no federal or state funding sources specifically set aside for noise abatement. While Mn/DOT typically funds noise abatement as part of new construction or reconstruction projects, retrofit noise abatement is provided only for those sites identified as high priority areas in Mn/DOT's 1997 noise study. Only one of these high priority sites is .located partially in Edina (east of TH 100, north of West 44th Street). Several potential funding sources are identified in the Freeway Noise Mitigation Study, but none of these sources has been used to date for retrofit freeway noise abatement. The City has worked with other metropolitan area communities to obtain state funding of noise mitigation through the State Legislature, but special state funding has not yet been authorized. City funding options include general revenues, bonding and special assessments. Opinions on special assessments for noise abatement or visual buffering are quite varied about survey respondents and neighborhood committee members. On the average, survey respondents Freeway Noise Mitigation Study - Executive Summary 2 Edina, Minnesota 1 indicated they would be willing to pay approximately $260 per year for ten years. An ' assessment of $260 per year for ten years would cover up to 25 percent of the cost for privacy fencing and somewhat mature landscaping on a typical residential lot. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS People participating in the neighborhood committees generally felt that berms would be preferable where space allows, and privacy fencing would be helpful and acceptable if it is not financially feasible to construct noise walls. Most people also felt it was important to provide landscaping with all forms of barriers. The following strategies are recommended to provide some relief to the neighborhoods impacted by the freeways in the City: • Work with Mn/DOT on a cost - sharing basis to provide privacy fencing and landscaping as part of the TH 100 and TH 62 major maintenance projects that are currently scheduled. Mn/DOT has indicated a willingness to participate in 50 percent of the cost of lightweight privacy fencing in these projects where the replacement of chain link fences is scheduled and where existing chain link fence is outside the clear zone. • Work aggressively with the Legislature to establish a state funding source for retrofit noise mitigation, privacy fencing and/or landscaping. • Determine an appropriate level of local funding for fencing and landscaping and leverage those funds to gain higher levels of state and federal participation in projects. • Identify demonstration projects that might fit the criteria for TEA -21 Enhancement, Livable Communities and Local Road Research Board funding and apply for grants. These funds have not yet been successfully used for noise abatement projects. • Establish policies and procedures that ensure excess fill materials from City projects are made available for use as noise berms wherever space is available. In addition, work with Mn/DOT, Hennepin County and private contractors to obtain excess fill for this purpose. • Work with private property owners to identify locations where excess fill could be placed on private property for noise mitigation purposes. • Participate in the Mn/DOT Community Roadside Landscaping Partnership Program to the greatest extent possible, providing supplemental funds so that more mature planting materials can be used. • Establish policies, procedures and design standards for the provision of fencing and landscaping in all residential areas along freeways. • Establish a local cost - sharing policy for fencing and landscaping. The following is suggested, but does not reflect current state or federal policies: - 50 percent state /federal funding - 25 percent City (general city funds) - 25 percent neighborhood (special assessments, private funds, in -kind contributions) • Involve neighborhoods in the final design of fencing and noise walls and in the selection of landscaping materials. Freeway Noise Mitigation Study - Executive Summary 3 Edina, Minnesota ° e o REPORT /RECOMMENDATION • �NQpR '� oP0 cg° • To: Mayor & City Council From: David Velde City Sanitarian Date: December 7, 1999 Subject: Resolution Authorizing The Transfer of Individual Sewage Treatment System Regulation To Hennepin County Recommendation: Agenda Item: V. B. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ❑ Motion ® Resolution Ordinance ❑ Discussion Adopt a Resolution authorizing the transfer of authority to Hennepin County for regulation of the individual sewage treatment systems in the City of Edina. Info /Background: The City of Edina presently regulates the construction and maintenance of individual sewage treatment systems. Presently, there are 6 systems in operation in the City. Hennepin County has adopted an Ordinance which will regulate these systems. At this time, staff recommends that we turn the regulation of the remaining systems in Edina over to Hennepin County. M RESOLUTION TRANSFERRING MINNESOTA AGENCY RULES 7080 TO HENNEPIN COUNTY City of Edina Whereas the City of Edina has been enforcing the individual sewage treatment systern Rules as set for in the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Rules Chapter 7080 and, Whereas, Hennepin County has enacted Hennepin County Ordinance No. 19, adopting Minnesota Rules Chapter 7080, and Whereas, Hennepin County is prepared to enforce these Rules in Edina and, Whereas, the City Council of the City of Edina finds that Hennepin County Ordinance No. 19 provides for the same protection of public health and welfare. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Edina hereby transfers the responsibility of enforcing Minnesota Agency Rules 7080 to Hennepin County and, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that David A. Velde be designated as the agent to act on behalf of the Edina City Council in transferring records held by the City of Edina to Hennepin County. Dated this 7f day of December, 1999. Attest: Debra A. Mangen STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) Dennis F. Maetzold CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing City Council Minutes is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of December 7, 1999, and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this 71h day of December, 1999. Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 (612) 927 -8861 FAX (612) 826 -0390 TDD (612) 826 -0379 ° e REPORURECOIIl MENDATION Cp 1eReas p, To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item: V. C. From: David Velde - Consent ❑ City Sanitarian Information Only ❑ Date: December 7, 1999 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Resolution- Minnesota Action ❑ Motion r Department of Health ® Resolution Amending The ❑ Ordinance Environmental Health ❑ Discussion Delegation Agreement Recommendation: Adopt a Resolution amending the Environmental Health Delegation Agreement between the Minnesota Department of Health and Edina. Info /Background: In 1987, an Environmental Health Delegation Agreement was executed between the City of Edina and the Minnesota Department of Health which authorized the City of Edina to assume responsibility for the licensing, inspection and enforcement of Food, Beverage and Lodging establishments in the City of Edina. This agreement referenced Minnesota Rules 4625.2400 to 4625.5000. These Rules have been repealed and replaced with the Minnesota Food Code, Rules 4626.0010 to 4626.1870. This Amendment to the Delegation Agreement will acknowledge the new Rules. The City adopted the new Rules on November 16, 1999. RESOLUTION AMENDING DELEGATION AGREEMENT WITH MINNESOTA DEPARTEMNT OF HEALTH WHEREAS, the City of Edina has a Delegation Agreement with the W essota�'dind Department of Health to perform Food, Beverage and Lodging establishment inspections, and ° WHEREAS, the City of Edina has adopted the Minnesota Food Code, Minnesota Rules 4626.0010 to 4626.1870, and WHEREAS, the Minnesota Food Code, Rules 4626.0010 to 4626.1870 will become effective January 1, 2000. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council.of the City of Edina hereby agrees to amend the Delegation Agreement between the Minnesota Department of Health and the City of Edina dated August 1, 1987, by referencing Minnesota Rules 4626.0010 to 4626.1870 in this amendment and to enforce same Rules within the City of Edina. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized and directed to execute any necessary amendment to the August 1, 1987, Delegation Agreement. Dated this 7h day of December, 1999. Attest: Debra A. Mangen STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) Dennis F. Maetzold CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that .the attached and foregoing City Council Minutes is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of December 7, 1999, and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this 7th day of December, 1999. Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk City Hall (612) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 826 -0379 J REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item V.D. From: GORDON L. HUGHES o Consent ❑ CITY MANAGER Cn ❑ Date: DECEMBER 7, 1999 ,aaa ❑ REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item V.D. From: GORDON L. HUGHES o Consent ❑ CITY MANAGER Information Only ❑ Date: DECEMBER 7, 1999 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: 2000 COUNCIL MEETING ® Motion DATES ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance , ® Discussion INFO/BACKGROUND: Approve Council Meetings for 2000 on Tuesdays with the exception of two dates: JULY WEDNESDAY JULY 5, 2000 (Tuesday July 4, 2000, is Independence Day) NOVEMBER MONDAY NOVEMBER 6, 2000 (Tuesday, November 7, 2000, is Election Day) 4 o e Cn Was REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item #v -E- From: Francis J. Hoffmar!! W Consent City Engineer Information Only ❑ Date: December 7, 1999 'Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ❑ To Council Subject: Resolution for Agreement for Action ❑ Motion Participation in Federal Aid ® Resolution Preservation Program for ❑ Ordinance Red Signal Bulb Replace- ments and Signal Paintin ❑ Discussion 6 Recommendation: Approve Agreement with Hennepin County to participate in Federal -Aid Preservation Program and authorize Mayor and Manager to sign Agreement., Info /Background: This project is to replace red traffic signal indications at 14 intersections along major arterials and repainting poles and mast arms at 8 of these intersections. The indication lights will be replaced with red LED's (light emitting diodes) thus increasing safety at these intersections along with decreasing power usage. This project will be funded through the Federal -Aid Preservation Program where Edina's 20% share is $16, 882.00 that will be funded through State -Aid funds. The agreement authorizes the County to administer the contracts and inspect the performance of contract work for this project. 11 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION AND City of Edina DELIVERY OF AGREEMENT FOR PARTICIPATION IN FEDERAL AID PRESERVATION PROGRAM WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, (the "City ") as follows: Section 1. Recitals. Hennepin County (the "County ") has prepared an agreement between the City and County to participate in the LED Replacement and Signal Painting project, City of Edina Improvement No. TS -29. The County will administer and inspect the performance of the contracts. Section 2. Approvals. The form of the Agreement is hereby approved, and the Mayor and City Manager are authorized to enter into the Agreement on behalf of the City in substantially the form presented to the City with such changes or modifications thereto as do not change the substance of the Agreement and are approved by the Mayor and City Manager, such approval to be conclusively presumed by the execution and delivery of the Agreement by the Mayor and City Manager. Dated: December 7, 1999 Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 7, 1999, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 8th day of December, 1999. City Clerk City Hall (612) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 826 -0379 REPO RT /RECOIII MEN DATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item: V. F. From: David Velde Consent ❑ City Sanitarian Information Only ❑ Date: December 7, 1999 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Nursing Services Contract Action ® Motion for Year 2000 ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Award a contract for Public Health Nursing Services to the Bloomington Division of Public Health for $182,005 for calendar year 2000. Info /Background: In 1999, the contract with Bloomington was $157,286. In addition, the City of Edina received extra funding from the Minnesota Department of Health, some of which was passed through to Bloomington on a formula basis. These pass through dollars were authorized by the Minnesota Legislature to offset basic public health core activities such as disease prevention and control. Each of the last two years, Edina has passed through $20,000 annually to Bloomington through this funding mechanism. This contract allows a three percent increase for Bloomington based upon last years contract amount of $157,286. This brings the Edina contribution to the contract to $162,005. The pass through dollars brings the total to $182,005. The contract covers the sliding fee costs for public health services delivered to Edina residents and other costs not otherwise reimbursed by private pay, insurance, Medicaid, Medicare or Veterans Administration. In 1998, the following services were provided to Edina residents through this contract: Page 2 Agenda Item III. A. • 74 residents received 2,494 home visits by home health aides, nurses and other related professionals; • 140 home visits were made for various family health matters including birth certificate follow -up; Edina was served by 8.05 full time equivalents of nursing staff, home health, aides and other support staff; • This contract covers approximately 50% of the costs of the services delivered by Bloomington to residents of Edina. The estimated contract cost per full time equivalent employee is $10.87 per hour. The costs for these services are offset by the Community Health Services Grant funding of $161,950. 0 r a e To: Mayor & City Council From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: December 7, 1999 s REPORT/RECOMMENDATION Agenda Item V.G. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Recommendation: Adopt a resolution approving the public auction of the tax forfeited property located at 5007 Bruce Avenue and requesting that Outlot 1, Evan Addition be conveyed to the City for public use as right -of -way. Info /Background: Hennepin County Taxpayer Services Division has advised the City that, two of land have been forfeited due to nonpayment of taxes. The properties are: 5007 Bruce Avenue and Outlot A, Evans Addition (located on the frontage road between Beard and Chowen Avenues). Location maps are attached for the two properties. The City's options are: 1. Approve the parcel for sale at public auction; 2. Approve the auction of the parcel to adjacent property owners only; or 3. Request conveyance of the property to the City,for public use. Staff has reviewed the parcels of land and believes that the property located at 5007 Bruce Avenue should be approved for sale at public auction. However, the Outlot in Evans Addition should be requested conveyed to the City for use as right -of -way because of its location near the Crosstown Highway. ® To Council Subject: Tax Forfeit Property Action ❑ Motion 0 ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Adopt a resolution approving the public auction of the tax forfeited property located at 5007 Bruce Avenue and requesting that Outlot 1, Evan Addition be conveyed to the City for public use as right -of -way. Info /Background: Hennepin County Taxpayer Services Division has advised the City that, two of land have been forfeited due to nonpayment of taxes. The properties are: 5007 Bruce Avenue and Outlot A, Evans Addition (located on the frontage road between Beard and Chowen Avenues). Location maps are attached for the two properties. The City's options are: 1. Approve the parcel for sale at public auction; 2. Approve the auction of the parcel to adjacent property owners only; or 3. Request conveyance of the property to the City,for public use. Staff has reviewed the parcels of land and believes that the property located at 5007 Bruce Avenue should be approved for sale at public auction. However, the Outlot in Evans Addition should be requested conveyed to the City for use as right -of -way because of its location near the Crosstown Highway. / 4yUO 4911 '+Zl ic 4915 4928 T 06 4914 07 4910 4913 4916 4917 4932 108 4400 4914 4919 4920 4919 4936 50TH ST W 4401 5000 W 5001 5002 Q 5003 5004 5005 5006 X500,7 5009 5008 5011 5010 5013 5012 5015 5016 5017 5019 5018 5021 5024 5022 5020 5000 5001 Q 4215 -13 1 5002 5003 5004 5005 5006 5007 LU 5008 Q 5009 5010 5011 5012 5013 503E 5014 5015 5040 5016 5017 5019 5044 5018 5020 [5101 5100 6205 6209 6213 6217 6221 I 6229 6301 I .. _ ....... _ ....... _ ...... __. i 6305 J 6309 i 6313 " \. \ 6317 1 6204 ,i 6208 6212 — ._..... _ ...... � 6216 i _.._......... -- -i 6220 I 6224 6300 6304 6308 ...................... H N0 I I I Odd NVA3 't ionn0 2f03 dVW NO I iVO04, . 6 632( i ...................... H N0 I I I Odd NVA3 't ionn0 2f03 dVW NO I iVO04, . 6 632( -w REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: Francis J. Hoffman, City Engineer Date: December 7, 1999 Subject: Resolution approving Capital Improvement Schedule for Pamela Park Regional Ponds with Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Recommendation: Agenda Item # v. x. Consent Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ❑ To Council Action ❑ Motion ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Approve attached Capital Improvement Schedule for Pamela Park Regional Ponds with Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Info /Background: This request is a follow -up from the Public Hearing conducted on January 19, 1999 authorizing the concept plan for Pamela Lake / Regional Pond Restoration Project as a joint venture with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD). The MCWD has submitted this project as a Minor Plan Amendment to their Capital Improvement Plan which will be approved by both Hennepin and Carver County in January. A cooperative agreement between the City and MCWD is currently being drafted for approval in January, 2000. This Capital Improvement Schedule reassures the MCWD of the City's intent and also outline the financial responsibilities of the agencies. The City's financial responsibility will be a nature trail for $23,000 and minor performance monitoring after the ponds are completed. Staff recommends approving the attached schedule. RESOLUTION APPROVING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT SCHEDULE FOR PAMELA PARK REGIONAL PONDS IMPROVEMENT WITH THE MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, (the "City ") as follows: Section 1. Recitals. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (the "MCWD ") and the City has agreed on a concept plan for lake and wetland restoration work in Pamela Park. And MCWD has prepared a Capital Improvement Plan dated December 1, 1999 for this project. A cooperative agreement between the City and MCWD will be drafted during January, 2000. Section 2. Approvals. This Capital Improvement Schedule is hereby approved, and any such changes or modifications thereto as do not change the substance of the Schedule are approved by the Mayor and City Manager, such approval to be conclusively presumed by the execution and delivery of the Agreement to MCWD by City Manager. Dated: December 7, 1999 Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 7, 1999, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 8th day of December, 1999. City Clerk Pamela Park Regional Ponds i Capital Improvement Schedule ' WORK ITEM LEAD AGENCY FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY TIMELINE PLAN DEVELOPMENT DEVELOP CONCEPT PLAN EDINA EDINA May-99 a. Structural b. Non - Structural C. Public Participation d. Education Component APPROVE CONCEPT PLAN MCWD MCWD Oct -99 AMEND MCWD Wat. Res. Mgt. Plan MCWD MCWD Dec -99 NOTIFY NEIGHBORHOOD EDINA EDINA May-99 SCHEDULE PRE - DESIGN MEETINGS EDINA EDINA May-99 APPLY FOR REQUIRED PERMITS MCWD MCWD Dec -99 AUTHORIZE FINAL PROJECT DESIGN MCWD MCWD Dec -99 DEVELOP COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT MCWD MCWD Dec -99 DETERMINE COMMUNICATIONS / EDUCATION PLAN MCWD MCWD Dec -99 DETERMINE FUNDING MECHANISM MCWD MCWD Nov -99 DESIGN AUTHORIZE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT MCWD MCWD Dec -99 SITE TOPO SURVEY EDINA EDINA Nov -99 WETLAND DELINIATION EDINA EDINA Nov -99 PREPARE FINAL PROJECT DESIGN MCWD MCWD Jan -99 PUBLIC HEARING TO ORDER PROJECT MCWD MCWD Jan -99 PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS: a. Interpretive sin MCWD MCWD Jan -99 PREPARE LANDSCAPE DESIGN MCWD MCWD Jan -99 a. Neighborhood Meeting / Communications / Education MCWD MCWD Jan -99 IMPLEMENTATION DEVELOP PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS MCWD MCWD Jan -99 SOLICITATION FOR PROJECT BIDS EDINA MCWD Jan / May 99 AWARD PROJECT BID EDINA MCWD Feb / May 99 SCHEDULE PRE - CONSTRUCTION MEETING EDINA MCWD Feb / May 99 MANAGE CONSTRUCTION EDINA MCWD 2000 a. Structural Element 1. Dredging EDINA MCWD winter 2000 2. Wetland Restoration EDINA MCWD summer 2000 3. Maintenance Access EDINA MCWD summer 2000 4. Trails EDINA EDINA summer 2000 5. Landscaping EDINA MCWD fall 2000 6. Inspections of 1 -5 EDINA MCWD 2000 7. Punch List follow-ups EDINA MCWD fall 2000 8. Neighborhood Notifications / Updates / Education EDINA MCWD 2000 9. As- builts EDINA MCWD fall 2000 b. Non - Structural Element 1. Signing MCWD MCWD summer 2000 2. Publicity MCWD MCWD spring 2000 3. Public Participation Element MCWD MCWD summer 2000 PERFORMANCE MONITORING WATER QUALITY MONITORING / ANALYSIS a. Sediment Accumulation - visual EDINA EDINA yearly b. Treatment pond areas - visual annually EDINA EDINA yearly c. Pond areas - visual every third year EDINA EDINA every third year MAINTENANCE DEVELOP CITY WATER QUALITY MAINTENANCE POLICIES EDINA EDINA Spring 2000 Minor Maintenance a. Street Sweepings - established policy ( 4 -6 times a ear EDINA EDINA on-going b. Purple loosestrife - observational EDINA EDINA on-going c. Phosphorous observation - visual EDINA EDINA on-going d. Park land management - visual EDINA EDINA on-going Major Maintenance a. sediment removal - three to five years MCWD MCWD see above ADOPT CITY WATER QUALITY ASSURANCE POLICIES EDINA EDINA Fall 2000 Page 1 12/2/1999 y�. °k e REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item: V. I. From: Craig Larsen Consent x❑ City Planner Information Only ❑ Date: December 7, 19.99 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Minnesota Livable Action ❑ Motion Communities' Act ® Resolution Participation ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Adopt Resolution authorizing continued participation in the Local Housing Incentive Account Program. Info /Background: Adoption of the attached resolution notifies the Metropolitan Council that Edina intends to continue its participation in the program. This is essentially the same resolution adopted by the Council last year. 0 14 `r RESOLUTION ELECTING TO CONTINUE o PARTICIPATING IN THE LOCAL HOUSING INCENTIVES ACCOUNT PROGRAM UNDER THE ,a0 METROPOLITAN LIVABLE COMMUNITIES ACT CALENDAR YEAR 2000 City Of Edina WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act (Minnesota Statutes Section 473.25 to 473.254) establishes a Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund which is intended to address housing and other development issues facing the metropolitan area defined by Minnesota Statutes Section 473.121; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Livable Communities fund, comprising the Tax Base Revitalization Account, the Livable Communities Demonstration Account and the Local Housing Incentive Account, is intended to provide certain funding and other assistance to metropolitan area municipalities; and WHEREAS, a metropolitan area municipality is not eligible to receive grants or loans under the Metropolitan Livable Communities fund or eligible to receive certain polluted sites cleanup funding from the Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic Development unless the municipality is participating in the Local Housing Incentives Account Program under the Minnesota Statutes section 473.254; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act requires the Metropolitan Council to negotiate with each municipality to establish affordable and life -cycle housing goals for the municipality that are consistent with and promote the policies of the Metropolitan Council as provided in the adopted Metropolitan Development Guide; and WHEREAS, each municipality must identify to the Metropolitan Council the actions the municipality plans to take to meet the established housing goals through preparation of the Housing Action Plan; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council adopted, by resolution after a public hearing, negotiated affordable and life -cycle housing goals for each participating municipality; and WHEREAS, a metropolitan area municipality which elects to participate in the Local Housing Incentives Account Program must do so by November 15 of each year; and WHEREAS, for calendar year 2000, a metropolitan area municipality that participated in the Local Housing Incentive. Account Program during the calendar year 1999, can continue to participate under Minnesota Statutes section 473.254 if; (a) the municipality elects to participate in the Local Housing Incentives Account Program by November 15,1999; and (b) the Metropolitan Council and the municipality have successfully negotiated affordable and life -cycle housing goals for the municipality: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City of Edina hereby elects to participate in the Local. Housing Incentives, Program under the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act during the calendar year 2000. Passed this 7th day of December, 1999. - Attest: Debra A. Mangen City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 Dennis F. Maetzold (612) 927 -8861 FAX (612) 826 -0390 TDD (612) 826 -0379 Cht/fowasldo Ediro : Ml TIkOPOLITAN COUNCIL AFFORDABLE LQ' EECYCLE HOUSING FOR THE YBAR.19" 4% of Total Pay 1995 Pay 1999 AHotdabte & Life Payable 1998 Payable 1999 Pavahle 1998 Homestead Homestead 4% of Total M-lwd %'do# Nat Tax Capadly Net Tat Capadly Growth to Kneen Homestead Base Amount Exees Excess Bxoea a Load Rate Tax Capsdfy 406,269 3,223,445 2,947,974 1,881,886 Ml TIkOPOLITAN COUNCIL AFFORDABLE LQ' EECYCLE HOUSING FOR THE YBAR.19" 4% of Total AHotdabte & Life Payable 1998 Payable 1999 Number of HowwwM ad Lesxar o(Growlh Pay 1999 C�ele Hoadrg Number of Number of Homesteads Tai Gpsdly to Eseeaa or 4% City Tas Opportrmttla Homesteads Homealasds Percentage s Local Rate . Home Tan Cavaeltt Rate Aiposmi In Eaeess to woe cbsna ))3,167.90 17.810% - 947 1023 8.03% D a O, e 0 0 .,�. 88 . REPORURECOMMENDATION To: Mayor Maetzold and Members of Agenda Item V. J- the Edina City Council. From_ : John Keprios, Direct r Consent Park & Recreation Depa ent Information Only ❑ ❑ Date: November 23, 1999 Mgr. Recommends To HRA ® To Council ® Subject: Braemar Arena Advertising/EHA Motion Proposal. ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion RECOMMENDATION: The Park Board recommends that the City Council APPROVE THE EDINA HOCKEY ASSOCIATION ADVERTISING PROPOSAL FOR THE PERIOD OF DECEMBER 1 ST, 1999, THROUGH NOVEMBER 30, 2000. Motion carried unanimously. INFOBACKGROUND: At the November Park Board meeting, the Edina Hockey Association (EHA) proposed a joint fund- raising effort with the City of Edina that involves commercial advertising displays on the hockey rink dasher boards at Braemar Arena. The EHA is proposing to: • Solicit appropriate advertisers. • Coordinate art work and manufacturing of graphics: • Collect all funds and pay all related expenses. • Monitor deterioration and the timing for replacement of graphics. • Provide the City a copy of all financial records of the project. • Give the City of Edina 25% of all profits. The EHA proposal (copy attached) includes the anticipated revenues and expenses. After lengthy discussion, the Park Board agreed that the proposal should be viewed as: • An opportunity to support the EHA and potentially the Braemar City of Lakes Figure Skating Club, which continue to face escalating costs. • An opportunity to raise revenues for Braemar Arena at no risk with no added expenses to the Arena's operations. • Aesthetically acceptable on a one year trial basis. In a sense, the concessions stand operations is a good analogy to this proposal. The Braemar Arena concessions stand is run by the Edina Hockey Parents (formerly the Edina Hockey Moms). Braemar Arena receives a percentage of the profits, the EHA receives financial support, and the Edina Hockey Parents continually provide capital funding to upgrade the Braemar Arena facility. Again, the use of volunteers results in more dollars available for the program and facility. The EHA's proposal leaves the door open to the Braemar City of Lakes Figure Skating Club to pursue similar fund- raising through advertising on the East Arena dasher - boards. From staff's perspective, we view the EHA's proposal as a reasonable request. The City of St. Louis Park has a similar arrangement that benefits both their youth hockey program and the facility. It is also agreed that all advertisements must meet prior approval of the Park and Recreation Director in order to monitor the appropriateness of the advertisement in efforts to avoid socially, culturally or politically sensitive advertisements. EDINA HOCKEY ASSOCIATION 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 OFFICERS President Bruce Carlson Vice President A Todd Nieland H Secretary O Art Cobb Treasurer EDINA Bob Gleason MINNESOTA Past President Steve Ries 1999-2000 ICE COORDINATOR Bob Rauch Season November 3, 1999 John Keprios and Edina Park Board Members Dear John and Park Board Members, BOARD Linc Davis John Dulin Bruce Ferrara Nancy Fischmann Ernie Harper Scott Johnson Dick Kirklin Kip Knelman Pat Manion Jude Dugan Olson TOURNAMENT COORDINATOR Deb Dalton The Edina Hockey Association (EHA) would like to request permission to place "Dasher Board" advertising on the West and South rinks at Braemar Arena. With the continued pressure on the costs associated with providing an affordable hockey experience, we are challenged to find additional revenue sources. Currently, the EHA buys approximately 1,700 hours of ice per year from Braemar at a cost of $210,000. We have experienced yearly increases of $5.00 per hour for the last several years, and are paying $18,000 per year for "user fees ". Having 800 hockey players in our program gives us a natural network to solicit the sponsorship of this fundraising concept. We are also organized to facilitate the administration of such an effort. After research of similar initiatives and experience acquired from hosting the National Bantam Tournament last April, we are proposing the following: The EHA will be responsible for: • Solicitation of appropriate advertisers • Coordination of art work and manufacturing of graphics • Collection of funds and paying related expenses • Monitor deterioration and the timing for replacement graphics Braemar Arena would provide: • The dasher board space • Installation and removal of the adhesive graphics Dasher advertising would primarily be sold to local businesses and have one year terms. There would be a phase in time, however, assuming one calendar year at full capacity, the financial assumptions are as follows: • West arena, 15 advertisers @ $1,800 per year (2 graphics per rink) • South arena, 15 advertisers @ $1,200 per year (1 graphic per rink) • Both arenas @ 3 graphics total $2,500 per year • Manufacturing costs: 90 graphics @ $150 per graphic totals $13,500 (Assuming 1 replacement per location) Consequently, assuming a mix of one and two rink advertisers the gross revenue would be approximately $40,000 with net revenues of $26,500. The revenue sharing market appears to be 25% of the net revenue going to Braemar Arena, or $6,625 in this example. I have included some photographs of representative graphics on the dashers at Braemar Arena from last year's National Bantam Tournament. We would appreciate your support in this progressive initiative. The additional resources will assist in keeping our program costs affordable to the youth hockey players in our community and help us to maintain the standards associated with administrating, arguably, one of the finest hockey programs in the country. Sincerely, A. Q4` Bruce A. Carlson President, Edina Hockey Association Cc: EHA Board Members Larry Thayer, Braemar Arena i A EDINA PARK BOARD 7:30 P.M. CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS NOVEMBER 9, 1999 MEMBERS PRESENT: Bill Jenkins, Dave Fredlund, George Klus, Karla Sitek, John Murrin, Chuck Mooty, Tom White MEMBERS ABSENT: Andrew Herring, Andrew Finsness, Floyd Grabiel, Linda Presthus STAFF PRESENT: John Keprios, Janet Canton, John Valliere OTHERS PRESENT: Bruce Carlson, Jude Dugan Olson I. APPROVAL OF THE OCTOBER 12, 1999 PARK BOARD MI_NUTES George Klus MOVED TO APPROVE THE OCTOBER 12, 1999 PARK BOARD MINUTES. Bill Jenkins SECONDED THE MOTION. MINUTES APPROVED. II. EDINA HOCKEY ASSOCIATION ADVERTISING PROPOSAL Mr. Keprios indicated that as his staff report points out the Edina Hockey Association (EHA) is requesting that they be able to venture into an advertising fundraiser. He noted that Mr. Bruce Carlson, President of EHA, has submitted a letter that outlines EHA's proposal. Mr. Keprios showed examples of what the ads would look like and indicated that Larry Thayer, manager of Braemar Ice Arena, gave the EHA permission to put advertising on the dashers on a temporary basis for a recent Bantam tournament. Mr. Carlson explained that the advertisements are clear decals that are 10' long by 30" high and stick right onto the boards. Mr. Jenkins asked which arenas would have the advertisements and Mr. Carlson replied they would be in the West and South arenas. This way the East arena is open for the Figure Skating Club to have the same opportunity. Mr. Keprios pointed out that some precedent has already been set in the arena with the advertising that was done for the hockey tournaments on a short-term basis. He also commented that the Edina Baseball Association has set some precedent because they have been advertising on the scoreboards at Courtney fields. Mr. Carlson commented that they use the same company that does the decals for Mariucci Arena, and it's a very high quality look. Mr. Keprios indicated that one question that came to his mind is the aesthetics. Also, he noted that the city is not doing this with the intent to make money but with the intent to be supportive much like we are with the concession stand for the Edina Hockey Parents. He noted, however, that the city does get a cut of the profits. Mr. Keprios indicated that another issue of concern is to make sure that the East arena is set aside if the Figure Skating Club is interested in using advertising as a fundraiser. He explained that he did speak to the president of the Figure Skating Club and was told the issue would be discussed with their Board members, however, they are not sure if this is something they would be interested in. Mr. Keprios noted that the Figure Skating Club's concern is could the advertisements be taken down from the West arena when they have their figure skating show. He informed her that he did not have the answer. Mr. Carlson commented that once you remove the adhesive you have to redo them in which Mr. Keprios responded that, if necessary, they we could simply cover them up. Mr. Murrin asked if this has good revenue potential. Mr. Carlson explained that if they sold everything the gross revenue would be approximately $40,000 with net revenues of $26,500. The revenue sharing market appears to be 25% of the net revenue going to Braemar Arena, which would be $6,625 in this example. Mr. Keprios commented that this would be a great fundraising opportunity for the EHA. Mr. Mooty asked what is the approach as far as what's appropriate to have advertised as well as the look and consistency of the advertising. Mr. Keprios explained that a few year ago he was asked to come up with a policy for advertising on city property. The policy included language that covers us so we are sure to stay away from alcohol, tobacco and all of the other politically and culturally sensitive issues. The process is that it has to meet the city's approval and he will administratively handle that issue. Ms. Sitek explained that the graphic people. suggest just using one word with their logo because that is what the people will see, as well as it makes less of a danger of coming up with inappropriate items. Mr. Mooty confirmed that Mr. Keprios is saying that he will be giving the approval from the city's standpoint in which Mr. Keprios replied that is correct. He noted that if there is ever any question or issue he will run it through the process, however, he doesn't see there being a problem. Mr. Carlson indicated that he had a discussion with Mr. Thayer regarding the fact that the city has a deal with Coca -Cola and therefore we do need to offer them a dasher on each board if they want to pay for it. Mr. Mooty asked if the deal with Coca -Cola prohibits any tie with a competitor. Mr. Keprios noted that the contract arrangement is that we have so no other soft drink competitors could come into the city throughout the whole park system including the golf course. In return Coca -Cola gives us a lot of dollars up front to use for capital at those enterprise facilities, $80,000 to be exact. He noted that was part of the contract arrangement that if there was any advertising they would be it. Mr. Keprios stated that at one time Coca -Cola requested to advertise on a dasher board and we told them no. Mr. Murrin asked if it is legal to favor one competitor to the exclusivity of another. Mr. Keprios explained that we had an open bid process where other soft drink companies competed for the large contract, which resulted in tremendous savings for the city. He commented that not long ago Pepsi was the provider for the city. 2 Mr. Jenkins asked what is going to be done with the money that is made. Mr. Carlson replied that the additional resources will assist in keeping our program costs affordable to the youth hockey players in our community and help us to maintain the standards associated with administering the program. Mr. Jenkins asked how many participants are there in the program to which Mr. Carlson noted about 800. Primarily what they want to do is reduce or maintain registration fees and make it a more affordable experience. He also explained that what they do through capital improvements helps out the entire program and more times than not the High School as well. They put in a shooting cage a few years ago, they now have a furnished meeting room, video resources, coaching resources and an education program for coaches. He pointed out that they require all of their coaches to be certified even the assistant coaches which costs $35.00 to $40.00 per person and there are a lot of coaches. Jude Dugan Olson pointed out that they have one sponsor for each team and they are usually Edina businesses or parents who sponsor these teams. She noted that right now they have 35 community sponsors. She indicated that five of those sponsors have already indicated that they would be interested in this advertising fundraiser. Mr. Mooty asked if the hockey season is a full year as far as the hockey association is involved. Mr. Carlson responded that their season is basically November through the middle of March. However, there are kids who play hockey all year which is through other organizations and individuals. Mr. Mooty indicated that the reason he is asking is does the association really get the benefit for a full year. He noted that he doesn't see that to be a real problem but he thinks again it is setting a precedent for other activities that we get into where the beneficiary of it is not for the time that all of the activity is going on. This may have a potential to cause some more issues as we go into this endeavor. Mr. Mooty commented that he thinks it's a great way to capitalize and utilize whatever dollars we can get from outside to support it. Mr. Carlson suggested taking it one year at a time and see how it goes. Mr. Mooty replied he thinks that is the approach we are going to have to take. It should be done on an annual basis. Mr. Carlson indicated that maybe it would make sense to make the contract 6 to 8 months. Mr. Mooty noted that he doesn't know if you would lose much by saying it's for the season, but again you could try it and see what happens. George Klus MOVED THAT WE APPROVE THE EDINA HOCKEY ASSOCIATION ADVERTISING PROPOSAL FOR THE PERIOD OF DECEMBER 1ST, 1999 THROUGH NOVEMBER 30, 2000. Mr. White noted that Mr. Keprios had mentioned in his proposal that the motion needs to be contingent on the Figure Skating Club. Mr. Keprios replied that he wanted them to have their day in court if they are interested and believes they have been informed and will continue to have an opportunity to participate. Mr. Klus stated that the EHA is only asking for the West and South arenas. John MURRIN SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. 3 � 91N�1r�,� , o e REPORT/RECOMMENDATION 'To: Mayor -& City Council Agenda Item # VI.A. From: Debra Mangen Consent City Clerk Information Only F-1 Date: December 7,1999 Mgr. Recommends F-1 To HRA ® To Council Subject: Receive petition requesting street light installation Action ® Motion FI Resolution Ordinance Discussion Recommendation: Refer the petition received to Engineering for processing as to feasibility. Info/Background: The City received a petition circulated by Diane Mashaal and signed by the residents of 5000, 5001, 5004 and 5008 Oak Bend Lane requesting the installation of a street light at 5001 Oak Bend Lane. The City's normal procedure is to refer the petition to the Engineering Department for processing as to feasibility. o h w9`N�1rt. o e City of Edina, Minnesota DATE: r n CITY COUNCIL q -��r,� v 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 � (612) 927 -8861 • (612) 927 -7645 -FAX • (612) 927 - 5461 -TDD PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL ❑ SIDEWALK ❑ ALLEY PAVING ❑ WATERMAIN ❑ STORM SEWER ❑ SANITARY SEWER XSTREET LIGHTING ❑ CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ❑ PERMANENT STREET ❑ OTHER: SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER To the Mayor and City Council: / The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the locations listed below. 00/ /l ��, c-e— between ' and 5 LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS between and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS between and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS between and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCEL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMTROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERNIINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. PROPERTY. OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME SIGNATURE (PRINTED) e,AuL. � DtANE Aj Af?AAA L- ko-r VACANT — PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNER'S PHONE dr s� This petition was circulated by: A . So o Qaj 937 - / 75.� NAME ADDRESS PHONE There is space for more signatures on the back or you may attach extra pages. SFFiEMSOZ 1990 /1A, _-Nr ok e \�roRPORA�v- ieeB REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item XI.A.B.C.D. From: JOHN WALLIN Consent ❑ FINANCE DIRECTOR Information Only ❑ Date: DECEMBER 7, 1999 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: FEES AND CHARGES ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ® Discussion RECOMMENDATION: Discuss the proposed fees and °charges to be adopted by ordinance and resolution. INFO/BACKGROUND: Attached are the following schedules for fees and charges proposed for 2000. The fees that are proposed to change from 1999 to 2000 are in bold. 1. Schedule of Fees and Charges for the General Fund. The rates reflect the overall 3% increase as discussed during the budget assumption process. 2. Resolution approved fees for Park and Recreation. 3. Resolution approved Ambulance Fees. 4. Resolution approved Miscellaneous Fees. 4 Schedule of Fees and Charges for the General Fund Fee No. Description 1999 Fee Permits 2000 Fee Fire Sprinkler Permit: 110 Sprinkler permit 50 -330 190 50 -330 118 Fire pump install 90 90 119 Standpipe install only 90 90 120 Each additional 10 10 Gas Pump, Tank & Burn: 95 -98 Special hazard 75-175 35 75-175 105 Grease vent 75 65 75 121 Fire alarm system - State Code 30 100 Fire exting system 30 20 30 False Alarms: 6 125 Residential 300 300 126 Commercial 500 500 Planning 85 Sign Permit 60 80 70 86 Bench courtesy 15 57 15 87 Sign variance - residential 125 125 88 Sign variance - commercial 250 250 Planning Fees: 160 NBR property owner $1 /owner 400 $1 /owner 180 Restricted parking 500 1 500 181 0 - 50 spaces 100 100 182 51 - 100 spaces 150 150 183 100 - 200 spaces 250 250 184 Over 200 spaces 400 400 192 -194 Rezoning 400-750 3 400-750 195 Retail sale in PID 300 1 300 196 Conditional use permit 500 1 500 199 Final developers plan 500 4 500 161 Lot division 100 4 100 162 Subdivision 400 + $50 /lot 4 400 + $50 /lot 163 Developer fee /plan A 6.5% total cost 6.5% total cost 190 Residential variance 150 50 150 191 Commercial variance 250 .3 250 25,198 Landscaping 100 10 100 197 Temporary conditional use 75 1 75 170 Vacation applications 300 3 310 230 Variance for RV storage 50 1 50 Resolution Compliance letters 100 40 100 Page 1 Schedule of Fees and Charges for the General Fund Fee No. Page 2 Description 1999 Fee Permits 2000 Fee Police /Clerk Massage & Amusement 1 Public dance 50 50 5 Lawful gambling 10 9 10 10 Mech amusement device location 60 7 15 11 Each machine 12 244 15 225 Loudspeaker permit 15 20 16 Commercial photography 290a Manager approve still 25 1 25 290b Manager approve motion 100 8 100 290c Council permit 300 300 265 Parking permit 3.50 /month 3.50 /month 266 Refund on sticker 3.50 /month 3.50 /month Manager Handgun carry permit 10 10 285 Business massage license 200 250 286 Individual massage license 70 30 72 286a Additional location 25 2 26 287 Investigation fee - indiv. license 70 12 70 288 Investigation fee - business license 1,500 1,500 289 Sexually oriented business 5,000 5,000 289a Investigation fee - sexually oriented 1,500 1,500 291 Impounded vehicle as posted as posted Police 220 False alarm 105 510 105 Dog & Impounding Fees: Impounding: 15 Daily care 16 100 16 16 First offense /year 35 140 35 17 Second offense /year 60 4 60 18 Third offense /year 110 1 110 19 Disposal 20 8 20 20 Dog license 26 100 26 20 Neutered license 13 300 13 21 Dog license renewal 1 yr 12 12 21 Dog license renewal 1 yr neutered 9 9 21a Dog license renewal 2 yr 26 26 21a Dog license renewal 2 yr neutered 13 13 22 Duplicate license 6 10 6 23 Kennel license 55 55 24 Extra dog or cat 100 1 100 City Clerk Beer & Liquor 205 On -sale Club 675 2 675 206 On -sale Intoxicating liquor 11,000 2 11,000 207 Off -sale 3.2 Malt - new 319 24 329 208 Off -sale 3.2 Malt - renewal 252 1 260 209 On -sale 12 Malt - new 319 5 329 210 On -sale 3.2 Malt - renewal 252 260 On -Sale Wine: 211 50 or less seats 1 829 1 1 1 854 Page 2 Schedule of Fees and Charges for the General Fund Fee No. Description 1999 Fee Permits 2000 Fee 212 51 - 100 seats 910 4 928 213 101 - 150 seats 978 5 1,007 214 Over 150 seats 1,045 6 1,076 215 Temporary On -sale Intoxicating 50 per day 65 79 per day 216 Temporary On -sale 3.2 Malt 57 per event 1 59 per event 217 Sunday On -sale 200 200 218 Manager's License 77 79 261 Sidewalk cafe 530 546 290 Restrictive road permit 10 300 10 Health Pool, Spa and Garage 81 Indoor swimming pool 370 26 390 82 Outdoor swimming pool 200 31 210 83 Whirlpool 100 16 110 157 Parking garage license 35 100 35 158 Parking garage inspection 65 30 65 130 Sewage disposal system 30 30 Food & Soft Drinks: 1999 License structure See next page for 135 Food establishment 545 61 2000 Licensing 135 Manager certified 495 31 Structure. 135 Added facility 140 10 136 Day care limited food 170 14 137 Take out food 365 17 137 Manager certified 315 3 138 Packagedfood 160 139 Food warehouse 90 140 Catering food establishment 545 6 140 Manager certified 495 1 140 Added facility 140 1 141 Itinerant food establishment 90 30 142 Retail candy shop 70 2 142 Additional facility 10 1 143 Potentially hazardous facility 110 4 144 Fleet of 5 or more 550 145 Catering vehicle 200 145 Added vehicle 45 146 Food vehicle 110 6 147 Fleet of 5 or more 550 147a Pushcart 160 1 148 Food vending machine 15 200 150 Food establishment plan 100% license fee 149 Minimum fee 25 151 Food establishment plan remodel 50% license fee Hotel license 1999 License structure 155 50 or less rooms 270 1 155 Over 50 rooms $2 /added room 156 Boarding and lodging house 70 2 Page 3 4 Schedule of Fees and Charges for the General Fund Fee No. Description 1999 Fee Permits 2000 Fee Food & Soft Drinks: 2000 License structure 135 High risk establishment 475 475 136 Medium risk food establishment 48 300 137 Low risk food establishment 17 75 138 Base fee 147 100 139 Beer or wine table service 10 50 140 Alcohol table service 12 100 141 Food vehicle 5 120 142 Additional facility 10 100 143 Pushcart 175 144 Itinerant food establishment 100 145 Food vending machine 200 15 150 Food establishment plan 100% license fee 100% license fee 149 Minimum fee 25 25 151 Food establishment plan remodel 50% license fee 50% license fee Hotel license 2000 License structure 153 Lodging establishment 100 $4 /room 154 Supervised group home 2 25 155 Boarding and lodging house license 1 75 Scavenger & Garbage: Collectors: 270 Garbage hauler 250 17 250 270 Added vehicle 75 64 75 280 Tobacco 270 22 270 Building Building Permits: Building permit fee calculation 30 $0-$500 21 21 31 $501 - $2,000 $21 + 2.75 /add $ > $500 $21 + 2.75 /add $ > $500 32 $2,001 - $25,000 $62.25 + 12.50 /add $ > $2,000 $62.25 + 12.50 /add $ > $2,000 33 $25,001.- $50,000 $349.75 + 9.00 /add $ > $25,000 $349.75 + 9.00 /add $ > $25,000 34 $50,001 - $100,000 $574.75 + 6.25 /add $ > $50,000 $574.75 + 6.25 /add $ > $50,000 35 $100,001 - $500,000 $887.25 + 5.00 /add $ > $100,000 $887.25 + 5.00 /add $ > $100,000 36 $500,001 - $1,000,000 $2,887.25 + 4.25 /add $ > $500,000 $2,887.25 + 4.25 /add $ > $500,000 37 $1,000,000 & OVER $5,012.25 + 2.75 /add $ > $1,000,000 5,012.25 + 2.75 /add $ > $1,000,000 37a Plan review 6.5% of permit fee 6.5% of permit fee 38 Reinspection 42 42 Inspection for state license $42 /hr or total hourly $42 /hr or total hourly whichever is greater whichever is greater Page 4 Schedule of Fees and Charges for the General Fund Fee No. Description 1999 Fee Permits 2000 Fee Code compliance inspection: 39 Residential 150 150 40 Commercial 320 320 41 License surcharge 5 5 45 Moving of buildings 212 212 46 Indemnity for damages 530 530 Street surface repair 51 Under 10 square feet $25 /square foot $25 /square foot 51a 10 - 25 square feet $20 /square foot $20 /square foot 51 b Over 25 square feet $17 /square foot $17 /square foot 50 Annual registration - Right of Way 200 200 50a Minimum permit fee 70 70 50b Per additional excavation (paved) 30 30 50c Per additional excavation (unpaved) 15 15 50d Underground util instal - tunneling $40/100 L.F. $40/100 L.F. 50e Underground util instal - trenching $55/100 L.F. $55/100 L.F. 50f Overhead utility installation $5/100 L.F. $5/100 L.F. 55 Installer's license 55 55 76 Water conditioner install 22 22 78 Surcharge for prohibited connection 100 /month 100 /month 165 Radio & TV antennas Building permit amount Building permit amount 175 Tree removal /grading Building permit amount Building permit amount 176 Excavation /open pit Building permit amount Building permit amount 80 Pool construction Building permit amount Building permit amount 90 Parking ramp license 100 100 260 Curb cut 35 35 Plumbing: Minimum fee: 60 Residential 22 22 61 Commercial 27 27 77 Testing RPZ backflow prevention 27 27 Fee calculation: 62 $0-$1,000 $16.00 + 3.10% > $500 $16.00 + 3.10% > $500 63 $1,001 - $5,000 $31.50 + 2.60% > $1,000 $31.50 + 2.60% > $1,000 64 $5,001 - $10,000 $135.50 + 2.15% > $5,000 $135.50 + 2.15% > $5,000 65 $10,001 - $25,000 $243.00 + 1.85% > $10,000 $243.00 + 1.85% > $10,000 66 $25,001 - $50,000 $520.50 + 1.65% > $25,000 $520.50 + 1.65% > $25,000 67 $50,001 & over $933.00 + 1.30% > $50,000 $933.00 + 1.30% > $50,000 Page 5 Schedule of Fees and Charges for the General Fund Fee No. Page 6 Description 1999 Fee Permits 2000 Fee Utilities Sewer rental charge: 235 Single family < 1600 cu. ft. 29.12 /quarter 29.12 /quarter 236 > 1600 cu. ft. 1.82/100 cu. ft. 1.82/100 cu. ft. 237 5 unit apts and greater 26.00 >4 or 1.82/100 cu. ft. 26.00 >4 or 1.82/100 cu. ft. 238 Comm'I & industrial bldgs 34 /water meter or 1.82/100 cu. ft. 34 /water meter or 1.82/100 cu. ft. 239 Industrial user strength Allocated by MWCC Allocated by MWCC 250 Service Availability Charge (SAC) 1,050 1,100 Water service: 243 East of Beard Ave. 1.64/100 cu. ft. 1.74/100 cu. ft. 243 Morningside area 1.64/100 cu. ft. 1.74/100 cu. ft. 242 All other areas .64/100 cu. ft. .66/100 cu. ft. 244 Excessive use charge .20/100 cu. ft. .21/100 cu. ft. Meter charge: 245 Up to 3/4" meter 7.78 /quarter 8.00 /quarter 245 1" meter 10.56 /quarter 10.87 /quarter 245 1 1/4" meter 12.06 /quarter 12.42 /quarter 245 1 1/2" meter 13.57 /quarter 13.97 /quarter 245 2" meter 21.85 /quarter 22.50 /quarter 245 3" meter 82.90 /quarter 85.40 /quarter 245 4" meter 105.50 /quarter 108.70 /quarter Flat water charge: 246 Park dept/sprinkle /skate 2,500 2,500 247 Street dept flush 11000 1,000 240 Curb water stops 12.50 each 12.50 each 241 Issue water meter Cost plus Cost plus 251 Connection charge 1,000 minimum 1,000 minimum 255 Storm water drainage 5.00 /quarter 5.00 /quarter Recycling 131 Single family 6.69 /quarter 6.69 /quarter 132 Double bungalow 6.69 /quarter 6.69 /quarter 133 Apts, condos 2 - 8 units 5.43 /quarter 5.43 /quarter Page 6 Ili o *Le M� ass � REPORURECOMMENDATION To: Mayor Maetzold and Members of Agenda Item X• B. the Edina City Council. From: John Keprios, Direc Consent ❑ Park & Recreation Depa e t Information Only ❑ ❑ Date: November 23, 1999 Mgr. Recommends To HRA ® To Council Subject: Park and Recreation Year 2000 1:1 Motion ® Fees and Charges Resolution. Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion RECOMMENDATION: The Park Board recommends that the Edina City Council accept their proposed fees and charges for the year 2000 as outlined on the attached schedule. INFOBACKGROUND: At their meeting on Tuesday, October 12, 1999, the Park Board approved staffs recommended fees and charges for the year 2000 with two exceptions. 1. Park Board proposes to charge $60.00 for an individual patron card until April 1 and $65.00 after April 1, whereas, staff recommended $55.00 and $60.00. 2. Park Board does not support exclusive use rental of Bredesen Park pathway, whereas, staff recommended a $50/hour and $200 /day charge for large group rental exclusive use of the pathway. Park Board prefers to have large organized group uses of Bredesen Park pathway be non- exclusive use for which they will still be charged for all expenses incurred by the City. Requests for exclusive use rentals of Bredesen Park pathway are extremely rare and / 1 therefore, staff will handle those non - exclusive use requests administratively on a case by case basis. As reflected in the Park Board minutes, there was lengthy discussion on the fees proposed for the Edina Aquatic Center. The Park Board is proposing that the resident family season ticket be raised $15.00 for the first two members ($7.50 per person per year more than in 1999) and raised $10.00 more for each, additional family member (from $15 per year to $25 per year). In other words, for a resident family of four, a season ticket would cost $115.00, compared to $80.00 in 1999. This is still less than what other comparable aquatic center- facilities charged in 1999, such as: Eagan's Cascade Bay Aquatic Center $162.00 St. Louis Park Aquatic Center $120.00 The increase in fees should generate funds to make future capital improvements that will be essential to continue to provide a functional and attractive aquatic facility. It is vitally important to continually provide new enhancements to the facility to maintain our customer base, keep participation numbers (and thus revenues) high and remain competitively priced in the market place. o 3 ., RESOLUTION SETTING 2000 PARK AND RECREATION FEES BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council does hereby approve and set the following 2000 Park and Recreation Fees. PARK AND RECREATION SUMMER SOFTBALL.: 1999.., 2000 PLAYGROUND $12.00 $13.00 COACH PITCH $40.00 N/A ADULT TENNIS INSTRUCTION $35.00 $37.00 YOUTH TENNIS INSTRUCTION $35.00 $37.00 PEE WEE TENNIS $25.00 $26.00 TEAM TENNIS $60.00 $63.00 TENNIS CAMP $75.00 $79.00 YOUTH SUMMER CLASSIC TENNIS TOURNAMENT $12.00 $13.00 IADULT SUMMER CLASSIC TENNIS TOURNAMENT $15.00 $16.00 ADULT ATHLETIC FEES SUMMER SOFTBALL.: SOFTBALL POST SEASON TOURNEY 1999. 2000 1 9W71 :2000 Co -Rec & Mens Classic League $345.00 $360.00 Team Entry Fee $50.00 $55.00 Mens/Womens 35 & Over &Industrial League $310.00 $325.00 BASKETBALL:: Non - Resident Fee Individual $25.00 $26.00 5 -Man C League $400.00 $425.00 Non - Resident Fee Team $150.00 $155.00 5 -Man B League $400.00 $425.00 FALL SOFTBALL:. 'HOCKEY -.. Co -Rec Leagues $225.00 $235.00 4 -Man League $200.00 $225.00 Mens Leagues $200.00 $210.00 - BROOMBALL; Non - Resident Fee Individual $25.00 $25.00 Co -Rec League _T $285.00 $300.00 Non - Resident Fee Team $150.00 $150.00 BANDY ..,.VOLLEYBALL _.. A- Division $2,000.00 $120.00/hr Officiated League s $225.00 .$235.00 B- Division $1,100.00 $120.00 /hr Non - Officiated -Leagues $125.00 $130.00 C- Division $1,050.00 $120.00 /hr Non - Resident Individual $10.00 $10.00 AQUATIC CENTER SEASON TICKETS CLASS FEES * (based on # of hours in class) Members - 10% discount RESIDENT FAMILY: 1999: 2000 First 2 members * $50.00/$60.00 *65.00/$75.00 Each additional member $15.00 $25.00 Maximum 8 members $150.00 $225.00 RESIDENT INDIVIDUAL: * $40.00/$50.00 *40.00/$50.00 NON - RESIDENT FAMILY: 1999. ; 2000 First 2 members * $70.00/$80.00 $80.00/$90.00 Each addition al member $15.00 $30.00 Maximum 8 members $170.00 $270.00 NON - RESIDENT INDIVIDUAL:: * $60.00/$70.00 $50.00/$60.00 Daily Admission $6.00 $7.00 Admission after 6 P.M. $4.00 $5.00 Aquatic Instruction 1 $50.00 $60.00 * Early Bird Special if purchased no later than May 1, 2000. ART CENTER MEMBERSHIPS: FAMILY - $35.00 INDIVIDUAL - $25.00 CLASS FEES * (based on # of hours in class) Members - 10% discount PARENT /CHILD WORKSHOPS* includes 1 child and 1 adult NON- MEMBERS NON- MEMBER/MEMBER 1999 2000 1999._;:: 2000 25 hours $4.28 $5.00 /hr 1 '/z hours $15/$13 $16/$14 24 hours $4.28 $5.00 /hr 2 hours $17/$15 $18/$16 21 hours $4.55 $5.00 /hr 3 hours $21/$19 $22/$20 14 hours $4.84 $5.00 /hr 4 hours $27/$25 $28/$26 12 hours $5.12 $5.00 /hr 5 hours $31/$28 $32/$29 8 hours $5.45 $6.00 /hr 6 hours $34/$31 $35/$32 5 hours $5.85 $6.50 /hr 7 hours $39/$35 $40/$36 4 hours $6.35 $7.00 /hr 8 hours $42/$38 $43/$39 *all clay and children's classes add $5.00 *all clay classes add $5.00 ARENA 1999 2000 Hourly Rate as of 9/95 $125.00 $130.00 Open skating Youth and Adult $3.00 $3.00 Skate Rental $1.50 $1.50 Skate Sharpening $3.00 $3.00 SEASON TICKETS set first week of Se tmber RESIDENT FAMILY; 1999 2000 First 2 members $65.00 $70.00 Each additional member $5.00 $5.00 Maximum 7 persons) $90.00 $95.00 RESIDENT INDIVIDUAL: $55.00 $60.00 NON- RESIDENT FAMILY. 1999'_ 2000 First 2 members $80.00 $85.00 Each additional member $5.00 $5.00 Maximum 7 persons) $105.00 $110.00 NON - RESIDENT INDIVIDUAL $65.00 $70.00 CLASSES $79.00 $79.00 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE GREEN FEES. 199V 2000 18 hole - non-patron $26.00 $27.00 18 hole - patron $20.00 $21.00 9 hole - non-patron $14.00 $15.00 9 hole - patron $11.50 $12.00 GROUP FEES - 18 holes $35.00 $40.00 GROUP FEES - 9 holes $18.00 $20.00 PATRON CARDS until April 1 1999 2000 Individual $55.00 $60.00 Executive Course $25.00 $25.00 PATRON CARDS after April 1 1999 2000 . Individual $60.00 $65.00 Executive Course $25.00 $25.00 COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS 1999 2000. Resident $19.00 $20.00 Non - Resident $23.00 $24.00 LOCKERS 1999 2000 Men's 72 inch $35.00 $35.00 Men's 42 inch $25.00 $25.00 Ladies 72 inch $15.00 $15.00 CLUB STORAGE $35.00 $35.00 CLUB RENTAL $7.50 $8.00 PULL CARTS $2.50 $2.50 GOLF CARS'` 1999 .2000 18 holes $24.00 $24.00 9 holes $14.00 $14.00 18 holes/ person with disabilit /s I rider $14.00 $14.00 Group Car Fees $32.00 $32.00 GROUP.GOLF LESSONS 1999 2000 Adult $64.00 $78.00 Junior $34.00 $36.00 BRAEMAR ROOM 1999. :.2000 =. Resident - wedding related $650.00 $675.00 Non - residents - wedding related $700.00 $750.00 Other events $250-$700 $275-$750 Concession Fees an annual increase of 5 %, as a general rule BRAEMAR EXECUTIVE COURSE GREEN FEES :, 1999 :: 2000 Adult non-patron $9.50 $10.00 r Adult patron $8.00 $8.50 Junior - non-patron $7.50 $7.50 Junior - patron $6.00 $6.50 Golf Cars (everyone) $11.00 $11.00 Pull Carts $2.00 $2.00 Group Fees $13.00 $13.00 DRIVING RANGE 1999. 2000 Large Bucket $5.75 $6.00 Small Bucket $3.75 $4.00 Warm-Up Bucket $2.00 $2.25 e, FRED RICHARDS GOLF COURSE GREEN'FEES ": " 1999 :: ::: .2000:.'.. " Adult - non-patron $10.50 $10.50 Adult - patron $9.00 $9.00 Junior - non-patron $7.50 $7.50 Junior - patron $6.00 $6.50 Golf Cars (everyone) $11.00 $11.00 Pull Carts $2.00 $2.00 Group Fees $13.00 $13.00 GOLF DOME 1999 2000 Large Bucket $6.25 $6.25 Senior Bucket $6.00 $6.00 Time Golf Y2 hour $8.75 $8.75 Hourly Field Rental $110.00 $110.00 Lea ue $700.00 $700.00 EDINBOROUGH PARK 1999 2000 Daily Passes $3.50 $4.00 SEASON PASSES 1999 2000 Edina Family first 2 members $205.00 N/A Each Additional Member $15.00 $25.00 Maximum 7 members $280.00 $280.00 Edina Individual $190.00 $200.00 Non -Edina Family first 2 members $230.00 N/A Each Additional Member $20.00 $30.00 Maximum 7 Members $330.00 $330.00 Non -Edina Individual $210.00 $230.00 Towel Fee $1.00 $1.00 Skate Rental $1.50 $1.50 Locker Rental $0.25 $0.25 BUILDING RENTALS. 1999 2000 1999 2000 Com'I Use/Trade Shows $2,500.00 $2,500.00 Banners $150.00 $150.00 Use of Rink Area $125.00 $125.00 EXCLUSIVE RENTAL -Cover Ice Area $400.00 $400.00 Friday Evening $1,500.00 $1,600.00 Domestic: Photo._Shoot (hourlyY Saturday Evening $1,500.00 $1,600.00 Any Park Area Blocked Off $50.00 $50.00 Prom $2,000.00 $2,200.00 Grotto $ 50.00 $75.00 NON - EXCLUSIVE RENTALS: " ' er hour Theatre $ 75.00 $ 75.00 1999 2000 Great Hall $ 75.00 $ 75.00 Great Hall $300.00 $300.00 Ice Rink $100.00 $100.00 Theater $125.00 $125.00 Commercial. Photo Shoot (hourly). Grotto $50.00 $75.00 Any Park Area Blocked Off $ 200.00 $ 200.00 Ice Rink $100.00 $100.00 Grotto $ 200.00 $ 200.00 Pool swim team $14.00 $14.00 Theatre $ 200.00 $ 200.00 -only) Great Hall $ 300.00 $ 300.00 1$30000 Ice Rink $ 300.00 CENTENNIAL LAKES Rental Concession Items Weekend Rental Full Evening 6 PM -1AM Paddle Boats 1999 2000: 1999: 2000 4 person boat ' /z hr $ 5.00 $ 5.00 Friday evening $600.00 $600.00 Winter sled per hr $ 3.00 $ 3.00 Saturday evening $600.00 $600.00 Ice Skates $ 1.50 $ 1.50 Cham PiOL Putting:,,... BUILDING RENTALS 9 hole $3.50 $4.00 '/2 day - Salon $100.00 $100.00 18 hole $7.00 $7.00 Full day -Salon $200.00 $200.00 Park Shelter Building's half. a Athletic Fields - Residents Onl Amphitheater Rental ' ' Lawn Games Amphitheater Rental I $75.00 /hr I $75.00 /hr Per Court $8.00 $75.00 PARK DEPARTMENT RENTALS General Park Areas: Van Valkenburg /Courtney fields ; Residents Onl 1999 2000:.:' 1999 2000.: Resident Use /hour N/A $35.00 Per field /day includes building $150.00 $150.00 Resident Use /day N/A $105.00 Edina. Athletic Associations Commercial Use (i.e. TV )/hour $60.00' $65.00 Field User fee/ artici ant $6.00 $7.00 Commercial use with light/hour $110.00 $115.00 Edina Hockey Association Outdoor Ho key: Rink , Picnic shelter /day - Cornelia $100.00 $105.00 Field User fee/participant $6.00 Showmobile /day $700.00 $700.00 Park Shelter Building's half. a Athletic Fields - Residents Onl Weber Park $75.00 $25.00 Per field - per day $100.00 $105.00 Cornelia School Park $75.00 $25.00 Per field - per hour $35.00 $35.00 Todd Park $50.00 $25.00 Per field - per hour with lights) $55.00 $55.00 Walnut Ridge Park $50.00 $25.00 Arneson Acres .Terrace Room Park.Shelter Bull din s (full ay) Per day /w /formal ardens/ azebo $125.00 $130.00 Weber Park $100.00 $50.00 Per hour, first hour $ 50.00 $ 50.00 Cornelia School Park $100.00 $50.00 Each additional hour up to 4 hours $ 25.00 $ 25.00 Todd Park $75.00 $50.00 Rosland Park Pathway Walnut Ridge Park $75.00 $50.00 Per hour N/A $50.00 Per day N/A $200.00 PEGGY KELLY MEDIA ARTS STUDIOS DO -IT YOURSELF lass 2000 EQUIPMENT lass 2000 SERVICES . HOURLY FEE: HOURLY FEE RENTAL 2 DAY RENTAL 2 DAY RENTAL. Transfer movies to $10.00 $12.00 35mm Slide $10.00 $15.00 video Projector Pictures or slides to $10.00 $12.00 Dual Slide $25.00 $30.00 video (album) Projector w /Dissolve Unit Audio Dubbing or $10.00 $12.00 VHS $20.00 $25.00 Transfer Camcorder VHS Video Editing $10.00 $10.00 Overhead $20.00 new $20.00 Projector old $10.00 35mm Photo Copies $5.00 $7.00 Opaque $20.00 $20.00 Projector 35mm Slide Copies $5.00 $7.00 16mm Movie $20.00 $25.00 Projector VHS Video Copies $3.00 $4.00 Super 8mm $15.00 $16.00 (up to 3 at one time) per copy Projector per hour with sound Foreign Conversion $5.00 $7.00 8mm Movie $10.00 $11.00 (PAL, SECAM) per copy Projector per hour Laminator /Heat Press $5.00 $5.00 Lowell Light Kit $20.00 $20.00 Audio Cassette Dupl. $1.00/ $1.00/ Wireless Mike $20.00 $20.00 copy copy Kit Customer provides blank cassettes video and audio), film and lamination supplies. PHOTO/VIDEO STUDIO RENTAL' 1999 .. 2000' Studio - not staffed - Introductory pricing $30.00 /hour $30.00 /hour (includes 2 Canon XL1 digital mini -DV video cameras, digital editor, and digital mixer) (props and expendables not included COMPUTER OPEN STUDIO TIME :' 1999 2000 Macintosh G3 or Compaq 266 Mhz PC $10.00 /hour $8.00 /hr. (includes use of Adobe Photoshop, PageMaker non - members pay and Illustrator software with Epson Color Stylus an add'I $10.00 printing - prints purchased separately) daily access fee MEMBERSHIP': All a ui ment or facilit rentals're 'uires.a members hi . °.. � 1999.:; _ _ �" 2000. One day/one visit pass - $10.00 $10.00 $10.00 Annual Individual Membership 12 months $25.00 $25.00 Annual Family Membership 12 months $35.00 $35.00 RESOLUTION SETTING AMBULANCE FEES FOR 2000 BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council does hereby approve and set the following ambulance service fees for 2000. AMBULANCE FEES Service Level Fees for Ambulance Service, including medical treatment and /or transportation to a medical facility: 1999 2000 Level 1 - ON SCENE TREATMENT $200.00 $210.00 Specialized medical services performed at scene with no transport involved Level 2 - MINOR CARE (BLS) $440.00 $465.00 Vital Signs Splinting Bandaging, etc. Level III - MODERATE CARE (ALS) $535.00 $570.00 IV, Nitrous, Nitro Spray, ASA EKG Monitoring Spine Immobilization Level IV - MAJOR CARE $630.00 $660.00 Medications MAST (inflated) Cardiac Pacing Airway Management Level V - RESPIRATORY /CARDIAC ARREST $765.00 $800.00 Level IV plus any: Cardio /Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) Defibrillation OXYGEN ADMINISTRATION $32.00 $33.00 MILEAGE FROM SCENE TO HOSPITAL $9.00 /mile $9.00 /mile ADDITIONAL MANPOWER OR MECHANICAL -0- $300.00 EXTRICATION RESOLUTION SETTING MISCELLANEOUS FEES FOR 2000 BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council does hereby approve and set the following miscellaneous fees for 2000: HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SPILLS RESPONSE 1999 2000 Engine/Fire Company $200.00 per hour $200.00 per hour HazMat Unit $400.00 per hour $400.00 per hour Specialized Personnel Limited Response $100.00 per hour $100.00 per hour Specialized Equipment Cost + 15% administrative charge Cost + 15% administrative char e Supplies Cost + 15% administrative charge Cost + 15% administrative charge Disposal Cost + 15% administrative char a Cost + 15% administrative char e Other City Resources Cost + 15% administrative charge Cost + 15% administrative charge PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1999: 2000 Zoning Compliance Letter $100.00 $100.00 J ` !Lr 12/07/99 Plan 12/07/99 12/07/99 814857 12/07/99 PRINTING COUNCIL CHECK _ SISTER 12/07/99 Repo 12/07/99 02- DEC -1999 (1- ) page 1 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT Brands VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM--- - - - - -- OBJECT-- - - - -PO -NUM ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 205389 12/07/99 $204.00 ABDELLA, PAUL Prof. Serv. AC 112499 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> 12/07/99 $204.00* Brands 205399 12/07/99 SOLD BE 205400 205390 12/07/99 $366.62 -.ACTION MAILING SERVICE Mail Process 83526 GENERAL(BILLIN PROF SERVICES < *> VERNON SELLING $366.62* Al Saints Brands COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 205391 12/07/99. $47.89 Air Filter Supply, Inc. Poly, Filters 018678 POOL TRACK.GRE GENERAL SUPPLI 2918 < *> 00016917 $47.89* CST OF GDS BEE All Saints Brands COST OF GOODS SOLD 205392- 12/07/99 $752.09 Airtouch Cellular Building 111099 INSPECTIONS TELEPHONE BE 12/07/99 $5.71 Airtouch Cellular Health 111099 PUBLIC HEALTH TELEPHONE BE 12/07/99 .$235.92 Airtouch Cellular Fire Dept. 111099 FIRE DEPT. GEN TELEPHONE EQUIP MAINT 3579 12/07/99 $138.78 Airtouch-Cellular Administration - 111099 ADMINISTRATION TELEPHONE Craft•Supplies AC 12/07/99 $481.52 Airtouch Cellular Park Administration 111099 PARK ADMIN. TELEPHONE ENGINEERING GE 12/07/99 $312.38 Airtouch Cellular Park Maintenance 111099 PARK MAINTENAN TELEPHONE 12/07/99 $7.85 Airtouch Cellular Park Portable 111099 TREES & MAINTE TELEPHONE 12/07/99 $8.24 Airtouch Cellular Golf Course 111099 CLUB HOUSE TELEPHONE 12/07/99 $512.68 Airtouch Cellular Utilities 111099" DISTRIBUTION TELEPHONE 12/07/99 $1,260.85 Airtouch Cellular Public Works - Engineer 111099 ENGINEERING GE TELEPHONE 12/07/99 $440.57 Airtouch Cellular Public Works - Street 111099 SUPERV. & OVRH TELEPHONE < *> $4,156.59* 205393 12/07/99 12/07/99 < *> 205394 12/07/99 Plan 12/07/99 12/07/99 814857 12/07/99 PRINTING 12/07/99 12/07/99 Repo 12/07/99 12/07/99 INSPECTIONS 12/07/99 All Saints Brands 205395 12/07/99 SOLD WI 205396 12/07/99 CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 Brands COST 205397 12/07/99 BE 00015541 205398 12/07/99 All Saints Brands 205399 12/07/99 SOLD BE 205400 12/07/99 CST OF GDS BEE All Saints $50.97 $167.15 $218.12* $108.00 - $228.50 $153.00 _$896.00 $63.00 $600.80 $500.00 $318.'60 $73.60 1 $2,94.50* $112.06 $112.06* $1,089.00 $13.62 $1,102.62* $143.00 $143.00* $79.88 $79.88* $75.00 $75.00* ALBINSON Plan Repro 814857 INSPECTIONS PRINTING ALBINSON Plan Repo C01140 INSPECTIONS PRINTING All Saints Brands COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 00016620 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE All Saints Brands COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 00015541 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE All Saints Brands COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 00015542 BOTH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE All Saints Brands COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 00016754 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE Al Saints Brands COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 00016754 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE All Saints Brands COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 00016917 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE All Saints Brands COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 00016966 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE All Saints Brands COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 00017025 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE All Saints Brands COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 00017053 50TH ST- .SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE All -Safe Div. of All Fir Extinguisher Maint. 029831 FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP MAINT 3579 ALSTAD, MARIAN Teaching AC 112499 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES ALSTAD, MARIAN Craft•Supplies AC 112499 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES AMERICAN CONGRESS ON SUR Dues- ACSM Don Johns DUES 200 ENGINEERING GE DUES & SUBSCRI 4525 American Gothic Display Item American Payment Centers Box Services $63.20 -AMERICAN SERVICES CORP Twine $63.20* 110699 PRO SHOP GENERAL SUPPLI 6112 12805 GENERAL(BILLIN PROF SERVICES 004357 LIQUOR YORK GE GENERAL SUPPLI COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 02- DEC -1999 (13:20) page 2 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------.----------------------------------- 205401 12/07/99 $89.80 Anderson, Duane A. Job Canceled 99003264 GENERAL FD PRO BUILDING PERMI < *> $89.80* 205402 12/07/99 $175.00 Anderson, Merle Refund /Cancellation R 111599 GOLF PROG RENTAL OF PROP < *> $175.00* 205403 12/07/99 $38.29 ANDERSON, MOLLY General Supplies 112599 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $38.29* 205404 12/07/99 $393.00 AON RISK SERVICES INC OF Premium 257631 CENT SVC GENER INSURANCE 12/07/99 $3,473.00 AON RISK SERVICES INC OF Premium 258004 CENT SVC GENER INSURANCE <, *> $3,866.00* 205405 12/07/99 $167.36 Aqua Pure Inc. Water Filtration 5525 -978 CITY HALL GENE CONTR REPAIRS 4540 < *> $167.36* 205406 12/07/99 $2,200.00 Arrigoni Bros Company Repair Steps& Replace 00 -C -10 BUILDING MAINT PROF SERVICES 5438 < *> $2,200.00* 205407 12/,07/99 $168.00 ASCAP License Fees for Perf 112399 ED ADMINISTRAT DUES & SUBSCRI < *> $168.00* 205408 12/07/99 $474.99 ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO. Baseplate 442532 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5930 < *> $474.99* 205409 12/07/99 $193.00 Asphalt Specialties Co., Blacktop Patching 1211 W 48TH STORM CIP 4520 .12/07/99 $193.00 Asphalt Specialties Co., Blacktop Patching 1211 STAUDER STORM CIP < *> $386.00* 205410 12/07/99 $100.00 ASSOCIATION OF TRAINING Cont. Education 1438 'POLICE DEPT.. G CONF & SCHOOLS 12/07/99 $30.00 ASSOCIATION OF TRAINING Cont. Education 1466 POLICE DEPT. G CONF &.SCHOOLS < *> $130.00* 205411 12/07/99 $12.18 AT &T Wireless Wireless 111699 CLUB HOUSE TELEPHONE < *> $12.18* 205412 12/07/99 $7.90 AT &T' Bldg. 111899 INSPECTIONS TELEPHONE 12/07/99 $32.07 AT &T Park. 111899 PARK MAINTENAN TELEPHONE 12/07/99 $0.32 AT &T Street 111899 SUPERV. & OVRH TELEPHONE 12/07/99 $12.66 AT &T Engineering 111899 ENGINEERING GE TELEPHONE < *> $52.95* 205413. 12/07/99 $28:80 AUGIE'S INC. Sandwiches 24057 FRED'RICHARDS COST OF.GD SOL 9025 12/07/99 $44.37 AUGIE'S INC. Sandwiches 24152 FRED RICHARDS COST OF GD SOL 9025 <*> $73.17* 205414 12/07/99 $31.95 BANNERS TOGO Vinyl Letters 11165 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 5077 12/07/99 $111.83 BANNERS TO GO Vinyl Letters - Fishi 11166 PATHS & HARD S GENERAL SUPPLI 5018 12/07/99 $85.20 _BANNERS TO GO Vinyl Letters 11167 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 5947 12/07/99 $85.20 BANNERS TO GO Aluminum Signs 11204 SNOW & ICE REM GENERAL SUPPLI 5193 . < *> $314.18* 205415 12/07/_99 $1,112.50 BARRETT MOVING AND STORA Moving Equipment C-02912- ELECTION PROF SERVICES . < *> $1,112.50* COUNCIL CHECK .._SISTER 02- DEC -1999 (1' ) page 3 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAMOBJECT --- - - - - -- -- - - - -PO -NUM ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 205416 12/07/99 $34.45 BARTOLETTI, SUE Art Work Sold at EAC 111899 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $34.45* 205417 12/07/99 $118_.17 Battery Wholesale Inc Batteries 7833 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5169 < *> $118.17* 205418 12/07/99 $502.25 BEARCOM- Radio E -83 1371994 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 3608 < *> $502.25* 205419 12/07/99 $32.00 Beer System Maintenance Beer Line Cleaning 3274 GRILL CONTR SERVICES 9026 12/07/99 $15.00 Beer System Maintenance Beer Line Cleaning 3276 FRED RICHARDS SVC CONTR EQUI 9026 < *> $47.00* 205421 12/07/99 $84.00 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 17630100 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $392.60 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF, GOODS SOLD LI 17681400 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 12/07/99 $30.00. BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 17681500 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/07/99 $49.28 BELLBOY CORPORATION ­COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 30332100 50TH ST SELLIN.CST OF GDS MIX 12/07/99 $9.3;99 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 30832200 YORK SELLING- CST OF GDS MIX 12/07/99 $65.64 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 30873500 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 12/07/99 $349.20 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 30874600 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 12/07/99 - $22.65 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 30885400 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 12/07/99 $63.85 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 17776800 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $51.00 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 17776900 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/07/99 $27.93 BELLBOY CORPORATION, COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 30924900 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 12/07/99 $70.49 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 30925000 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 12/07/99 $124.55 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 30925100 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $1,379.88* 205422 12/07/99 $245.70 BENN, BRADLEY Art Work Sold AC 111899 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER" 12/07/99 $194.71 BENN, BRADLEY Maint. Supplies AC 112499 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $440.41* 205423 12/07/99 $529.52 BERNARD J. MULCAHY CO IN Power Pack, Bearings 17051 POOL TRACK GRE GENERAL SUPPLI 2206 < *> $529.52* 205427 12/07/99 $46.10 BERTELS,ON BROS. INC. Calendars 7097890 SENIOR CITIZEN GENERAL SUPPLI 12/07/99 $72.43 BERTELSON BROS. INC. Markers & Pencil Shar 7101640 LIQUOR YORK GE OFFICE SUPPLIE 4369 12/07/99 $131.93 BERTELSON BROS. INC. Office Supplies 7102030 FIRE DEPT. GEN OFFICE SUPPLIE 3603 12/07/99 $19.90 BERTELSON BROS. INC. Card File - Misc Ofc 7098201 GENERAL(BILLIN GENERAL SUPPLI 12/07/99 $47.50 BERTELSON BROS. INC. Filing Cards - Misc O 7098201 ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLI 12/07/99 $9.32 BERTELSON BROS. INC. Office Supplies 7102031 FIRE DEPT. GEN OFFICE SUPPLIE 3603 12/07/99 $46.83 BERTELSON BROS. INC. Pens,Tabs, Folders, S 7111680 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 5196 12/07/99 - $45.17 BERTELSON BROS. INC. Returned Item - Keybo_ CM707574 PUBLIC HEALTH GENERAL SUPPLI 12/07/99 $30.75 BERTELSON BROS. INC. Binders, Adhesive Spr 7118050 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 5205 12/07/99 $21.70 BERTELSON BROS. INC. Office Supplies 7120320 POLICE DEPT. G OFFICE SUPPLIE 3062 12/07/99 $22.89 BERTELSON BROS. INC. Twine 7118051 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 5205 12/07/99 $92.50 BERTELSON BROS. INC. Gen. Office Supplies 7125860 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI 12/07/99 $10.06 BERTELSON BROS. INC. Office Supplies 7125860 INSPECTIONS GENERAL SUPPLI 12/07/99 $12.51 BERTELSON BROS. INC. Calendar Refill 7125860 PWKS ADMIN.GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 12/07/99 $12.90 BERTELSON BROS. INC. 2 -Sided Tape 7132020 CITY HALL GENE GENERAL SUPPLI 12/07/99 - $10.06 BERTELSON BROS. INC. Pens - Wrong Item CM709820 INSPECTIONS GENERAL SUPPLI 12/07/99 $46.86 BERTELSON BROS. INC. Office Supplies S005042 POLICE DEPT. G OFFICE SUPPLIE 3062 12/07/99 $3.96 BERTELSON BROS. INC. Hiliters - Office Sup 7129380 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI 12/07/99 $117.41 BERTELSON BROS. INC. Mat 7137050 POOL TRACK GRE GENERAL SUPPLI 2205 12/07/99 $52.88 BERTELSON BROS. INC. General Office Suppli 7143110 FINANCE GENERAL SUPPLI COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 02- DEC -1999 (13:20) page 4 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM • OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 205427 12/07/99 $22.62 BERTELSON BROS. INC. General Office Suppli 7143110 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI 12/07/99 $19.50 BERTELSON BROS. INC. Hanging Folders, Golf 7145240 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 5223 12/07/99 $76.41 BERTELSON BROS. INC. Office Supplies 7146110 PARK ADMIN. GENERAL SUPPLI 12/07/99 $22.05 BERTELSON BROS. INC. Calendars for 2000 7152800 INSPECTIONS GENERAL SUPPLI 12/07/99 $15.57 BERTELSON BROS. INC. Calendars for 2000 7152800 FINANCE GENERAL SUPPLI 12/07/99 $11.84 BERTELSON BROS. INC. Calendars for 2000 7152800 ELECTION. GENERAL SUPPLI 12/01/99 $4.22 BERTELSON BROS. INC. Calendars for 2000 7152800 ASSESSING GENERAL SUPPLI 12/07/99 $57.20 BERTELSON BROS. INC. Calendars for,2000 7.152800 ARENA ADMINIST GENERAL SUPPLI 12/07/99 $9:49 BERTELSON BROS. INC. Calendars.for 2000 7152800 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI • 12/07/99 $48.87 BERTELSON BROS. INC. Calendars for 2000 7152800. PARK ADMIN. GENERAL SUPPLI 12/07/99 $4.22 BERTELSON BROS. INC. Calendars.for 2000 7152800 PLANNING GENERAL SUPPLI 12/07/99 $25.43 BERTELSON BROS. INC. Calendars for 2000 7152800 SUPERV. & OVRH GENERAL SUPPLI 12/07/99 $61.76 BERTELSON BROS. INC. Calendars for 2000 7152800 PWKS ADMIN GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 12/07/99 $7.15 BERTELSON BROS. INC. Calendars for 2000 7152800 PUBLIC HEALTH GENERAL SUPPLI 12/.07/99 $12.65 BERTELSON BROS. INC. Calendars for 2000 7152800 CENT SVC.GENER GENERAL_SUPPLI 12/07/99 $1.05 BERTELSON BROS. INC. Calendars for 2000 7152800 ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLI 12/07/99 $4.29 BERTELSON BROS. INC. Calendar 7152940 FINANCE GENERAL SUPPLI 12/07/99 $4.46 BERTELSON BROS: INC. 2000 Calendar 7152801 ENGINEERING GE GENERAL SUPPLI 12/07/99 -$6.18 BERTELSON BROS. INC. Credit Memo - General O CM152800 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $1,145.80* 205428 12/07/99 $99.05 Besser Glass & Mirror General Supplies 19882 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI 9087 < *> $99.05* 205429 12/07/99 $165.87 Best Access Systems of M Access System MN -10945 PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPLI 5894 12/07/99 $75.00 Best Access Systems of M Door Repair MN_11004 GOLF ADMINISTR SVC CONTR EQUI 6290 < *> $240:87* 205430 12/07/99 $335.41 BEST BUY COMPANY.INC. Cost of Goods Sold 2,8105092 MEDIA LAB. COST OF GD SOL 9068 12/07/99 $79.82 BEST BUY COMPANY INC. Craft Supplies 00504086 MEDIA LAB CRAFT SUPPLIES 9072 < *> $415.23* 205431 12/07/99 $90.06 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS. Asphalt 79325 GENERAL MAINT- BLACKTOP 1704 12/07/99 $115.42 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS Asphalt 79331 GENERAL MAINT BLACKTOP 1704 •12/07/99 $89:26 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS Asphalt 79359 GENERAL MAINT BLACKTOP 1704 12/07/99 $50.46 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS Asphalt 79374 GENERAL MAINT BLACKTOP 1704 < *> $345.20* 205432 12/.07/99 $35.65 BLEDSOE, SARA Art.Work Sold at'EAC' 111899 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $35.65* 205433 12/07/99 $100.00 BLOOD,.DAVID Police Service 120199 RESERVE PROGRA CONTR SERVICES < *> $100.00* 205434 12/07/99 $83.80 BLUHM, KIMBERLEE Art Work Sold at EAC 111899 ART'CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $83.80* 205435 12/07/99 $52.00 BMS INTEGRATED OFFICE TE Maintenance Contract 127940 CENT SVC GENER SVC CONTR EQUI < *> $52.00* 205436 12/07/99 $186.37 Boise Marketing Services Plastic Fire Hats 21897020 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRE PREVENTIO 3607 < *> $186.37* 205437 12/07/99 $397.59 BOOKMEN INC, -THE Cost of Goods Sold 928486 ART SUPPLY GIF GENERAL SUPPLI 9086 < *> $397.59* 02- DEC -1999 (1:) ) page 5 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO DATE' CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM - - - - -- 205438 12/07/99 $661.13. ---------------------------------------------------------- BOYER,TRUCKS Spring Ass yU- Bolts, 910463 910597 EQUIPMENT OPER EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS 5165 5164 12/07/99 $139.09 BOYER TRUCKS Winterfron _ *> $800.22* 205439 12/07/99 $25.29 BRAEMAR PRINTING Logo Printing 52965 GOLF DOME ADVERT OTHER 6284 <*> $25.29* 205440 12/07/99 $159.00 BRAUN-INTERTEC Asphalt Testing 184731 W 48TH STORM CIP 12%07/99 BRAUN INTERTEC Asphalt Testing 184731 STAUDER STORM CIP 12/07/99 .$159.00. $55.40 BRAUN INTERTEC Compaction Testing 184995 STRT RESURFACI CIP CIP 12/07/99 $55.40 BRAUN INTERTEC -CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 184995 SKYLINE DRIVE 12/07/99 $55.40 BRAUN INTERTEC CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 184995 -ST MILL OVERLA CIP. - 12/07/99 $55.40 BRAUN INTERTEC CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 184995 Rosemary La Re CIP 12/07/99 $55.40 BRAUN INTERTEC CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 184995 Eden Prairie R CIP 12/07/99 $57.75 BRAUN INTERTEC Concrete Testing 184996 STRT RESURFACI CIP. 12/07/99 $57.75 BRAUN INTERTEC CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 184996 SKYLINE DRIVE CIP 12/07/99 $57.75 BRAUN INTERTEC CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 184996 ST-MILL OVERLA CIP 12/07/99 $57.7.5 BRAUN INTERTEC CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 184996 Rosemary La Re CIP 12/07/99 $57.75 BRAUN INTERTEC CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 184996 Eden Prairie R CIP <*> $883.75* 205441 12/07/99 $199.89 BRIN-NORTHWESTERN GLASS Contracted Repairs 351092 YORK OCCUPANCY CONTR REPAIRS <*> $199.89* - 205442 12'/07/99 $211.86 BRO -TEX INC 30 Gal. Drum 222790 SUPERV. & OVRH HAZ. WASTE DIS 5169 < *> $211.86* 205443 12/07/99 $75.40 BROCKWAY, MAUREEN Art Work Sold at EAC 111899 112499 ART CNTR PROG ART CENTER ADM SALES OTHER PROF SERVICES 12/07/99 $459.00 BROCKWAY, MAUREEN Teaching <*> $534.40* 205444 12/07/99 $180.00 BROOKS, DARLENE Teaching 112499 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES 0 *> $180.00* 205445 12/07/99 $30.00 - Brooks, John ITRS.Proceedings Purc 112399 FIRE DEPT. GEN BOOKS & PAMPHL <*> $30.00* 205446 12/07/99 $174.66 BROWN TRAFFIC PRODUCTS DS -LM602 Program Card 131058 TRAFFIC SIGNAL REPAIR PARTS 5091 12/07/99 $34.08 BROWN TRAFFIC PRODUCTS Alum. Tunnel Visor 131059 TRAFFIC SIGNAL REPAIR PARTS 5091 <*> $208.74* 205447 12/07/99. $145.44 Brown, Patricia A. Art Work Sold at EAC 111899 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER <*> $145.44* 205448 12/07/99 $65.00 BUDGET PROJECTOR REPAIR Contracted Repairs 8256 MEDIA LAB CONTR REPAIRS CONTR REPAIRS 9092 9092 12/07/99 $65.00 BUDGET PROJECTOR.REPAIR Contracted Repairs 8257 MEDIA LAB <*> $130.00* 205449 12/.07/99 $1,75.50 BUELL, KIM Art Work Sold at EAC 111899 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER <*> $175.50* 205450 12/07/99- $90.00 Burtis,.Bob Music Program on 12/2 111899 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER <*> $90.00* 205451 12/07/99 .$100.00 BUTLER, GEORGE Police Service 120199 RESERVE PROGRA CONTR SERVICES COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 02- DEC -199.9 (13:20) page 6 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ < *> $100.00* 205452 12/07/99 $40.00 CALHOUN ISLES COM BAND Music Program 11/7 10/03 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $40.00* 205453 12/07/99 $165.00 CALIBRE PRESS INC Safety Equip - Metal 298812 POLICE DEPT. G SAFETY EQUIPME 4223 < *> $165.00* 205454 12/07/99 $154.42 CALLAWAY GOLF Putter 93585359 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 8026 < *> $154.42* 205455 '12/07/99 $1,799.42 Camas Concrete 1118569 STREET RENOVAT CONCRETE 1766 12/07/99 $2;624.16 Camas Concrete 1118570 STREET RENOVAT CONCRETE 1766 < *> $4,423.58* 205456 12/07/99 $689.70 CAMPBELL-GROUP, THE City Work Shirts 20899 POOL TRACK GRE LAUNDRY 2183 < *> $689.70* 205457 12/07/99 $84.00 CAMPE, HARRIET Teaching AC 112499 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $84.00* 205458 12/07/99 $453.42 Capital Factors Inc Logo Apparel 1516693 GOLF DOME ADVERT OTHER 6330 < *> $453.42* 205459 12/07/99 $56.45 CATCO Fittings 3 -15153 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5061 < *> $56.45* 205460. 12/07/99 $123:75 CHEMSEARCH Maxi -Lube Red 436944 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 5085 < *> $123.75* 205461 12/07/99. $133.13 Chief's Towing Inc Tow Bus for SOT Trg. 438265 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONF & SCHOOLS 3611 < *> $133.13* 205462 12/07/99 $80.00 City of White Bear Lake Continuing Education 111999 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $80.00* 205463 12/07/99 $371.25 CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP E- 82.Repairs 40067 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONTR REPAIRS < *> $371.25* 205464 12/07/99 $52.00 Clark, Bridget Art Work Sold at EAC 111899 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $52.00* 205465 12/07/99 $1,,610.95 Commercial•Furniture Bro Remodeling 00713380 CITY HALL EQUIP REPLACEM 4515 12/07/99 $1,086.30 Commercial Furniture Bro. Remodeling 00713382 CITY HALL EQUIP REPLACEM 4516 12/0.7/99 $159.75 Commercial Furniture Bro Chair Replacement 00713597 CENT SVC GENER EQUIP REPLACEM 4527 < *> $2,857.00* 205466 12/07/99 $20.00 Commercial Pool.& Spa Su Pool Seminar 0103757- ED ADMINISTRAT CONF & SCHOOLS 2179 12/07/99 $258.50 Commercial Pool & Spa Su Chlorine, Muriatic Ac 0103792- POOL TRACK GRE CHEMICALS 2203 < *> $278.50* 205467 12/07/99 - $63.89 COMPUSA INC General Supplies 40107461 MEDIA LAB GENERAL SUPPLI 3783 12/07/99 $134.97.. COMPUSA INC General Supplies 40107710 MEDIA LAB COST OF GD SOL 12/07/99 $491.71 COMPUSA INC General Supplies 40107710 MEDIA LAB GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $562.79* COUNCIL CHECK .__iISTER 02- DEC -1999 (1- ) page 7 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------ 205468 12/07/99 $250.00 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Computerized Fleet Analy Interface Rewrite 20703 EQUIPMENT OPER DATA PROCESSIN 5146 < *> $250.00* 205469 12/07/99 $153.24 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS Ear Plugs, Gloves, Tu 0106504 PUMP & LIFT ST SAFETY EQUIPME 5095 12/07/99 $164.78 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS Gloves 01069755.BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 5204 12/07/99 $186.72 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS Tums, Lubriderm, Safe 01076043 GENERAL MAINT SAFETY EQUIPME 5218 12/07/99 $162.00 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS Rakes, Flashlights, B 01078380 GENERAL MAINT TOOLS 5256 < *> $666.74* 205470 12/07/99 $191.85 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO Stoneware 038281 ART SUPPLY GIF COST OF GD SOL 9050 < *> $191.85* 205471 12/07/99 $994.60 COUNTRY CLUB TURF Sod 1021 CENTENNIAL LAK FERTILIZER 2057 < *> $994.60* 205472 12/07/99 $94.59 COUNTRY FLAGS Flags 4297 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 3578 < *> $94.59* 205473 12/07/99 $314.18 Coverail.of The Twin Cit Cleaning Supplies 00000451 ART CENTER BLD CLEANING SUPPL < *> $314.18* 205474 12/07/99 $1,815.20 Curtis 1000 Letterhead 28743401 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL - SUPPLI 4511 < *> $1,815.20* 205475 12/07/99 $135.85 Dakota Mae Design Art Work 'Sold at EAC 111899 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $135.85* 205476 12/07/99 $54.60 Dalbey, Patt Art. _Work Sold at EAC 111899 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $54.60* 205477 12/07/99 $145.93 Danicic, John . Art Work Sold at EAC 111899 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $145.93* 205478 12/07/99 $88.98 DANIEL:SMITH`INC Cost of Goods Sold 7745704 ART SUPPLY - GIF COST OF GD SOL 9090 < *> $88.98* 205479 12/07/99 $395.81 DANKO EMERGENCY EQUIPMEN Foam 311351 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 3590 < *> $395.81* 205481 12/07/99 $927.00 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 76576 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 12/07/99 $490.25 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 76705 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/07/99 $2,188.15 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 76709 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/07/99 $1,070.90 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 77307 50TH ST SELLIN CST -OF GDS BEE 12/07/99 $106.20 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 77425 VERNON SELLING CST -OF GDS MIX 12/07/99 $2,437.15 DAY. DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD.BE 77426 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/07/99 $1,390.20 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 77427 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/07/99 $105.00 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 17951 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/07/99 $23.90 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 78.025 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 12/07/99 $406.10 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 78040 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 12/07/99 $2,063.98 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 78066 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/07/99 $49.80 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 78067 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX.. 12/07/99 $1,178.50 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 78229 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/07/99 $59.40 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BE.78230 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/07/99 $560.35 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BE.78539 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE < *> $13,056.88* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER AV 02- DEC -1999 (13:20) page 8. CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM - - - -. --------------------------------------------------------------------=---------------------------------------------------------- 205482 12/07/99 $104.34 DAY - TIMERS INC. Scheduling Program, - R 341.95396 ED ADMINISTRAT OFFICE SUPPLIE 2200 < *> BAKERY $104.34* 24168 GRILL 205483 12/07/99 $906.50 DCA INC Fee for Service 302682 CENT SVC'GENER HOSPITALIZATIO < *> 5th $906.50* BAKERY Bakery 205484 205486 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 205487 12/07/99 205488 12/07/99 205489 12/07/99 12/07/99 205490 12/07/99 12/07/99 205491 12/07/99 < *> 205492 12/07/99 $30.57 $27.63 - $19.16 $32.97 $31.00 $40.59 $43.24 $26.30 $213.14* $137.67 $65.27 $96.53 $64.32 $20.27 $16.08 $16.08 $30.58 $32.16 $48.44 $97.33 $80.32 $127.79 $258.50 $15.22 $96.91 $49.44 $1,252..91* $28.63 $28.63* $179.35 $179.35* $349.32 $87.33 $436.65* DENNYS 5th AV BAKERY Bakery 23852 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 9029 DENNYS 5th AV BAKERY Bakery 24168 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 9029 DENNYS 5th AV BAKERY Bakery STMT. CR GRILL COST OF GD SOL 9029 DENNYS 5th AV.BAKERY Bakery 25462 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 9029 DENNYS 5th AV BAKERY Bakery 25491 GRILL COST OF GD.SOL 9029 DENNYS 5th AV BAKERY Bakery 25559 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 9029 DENNYS 5th AV BAKERY Bakery 25856 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 9029 DENNYS 5th AV BAKERY Bakery 25943 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 9029 Department of Administat Warming House Department of Administat Liquor 50th Department of Administat Liquor York Department of Administat Liquor Vernon Department'of Administat Historical Department of .Administat Arneson Department of Administat Greenhouse Department of Administat Card Access -Parks Department of Administat Senior Center Department of Administat Aquatic Department of Administat Fire Station #2 Department of Administat Central Svcs Department of,Administat Art Center Department of Administat Edinborough Department of Administat Arena Department of Administat_ Golf Dome' Department of Administat I.D. DEXTER SHOE COMPANY Merchandise DIAMOND,ART_& CRAFT DIST Cost of Goods Sold Diamond Vogel Paints White Paint Diamond Vogel Paints Paint $1,264.00 DICKER, TOBIE $111.00 DICKER,_TOBIE $1,375.00* $408.00 DIETRICHSON, BILL $408.00* $6,153.00 DLT Solutions Inc $6,153.00* SEP -99 SEP -99 SEP -99 SEP -99 SEP -99 SEP -99 SEP -99 SEP -99 SEP -99. SEP -99 SEP -99 SEP -99 SEP -,99 SEP -99 SEP -99 SEP -99 W9909065 SKATING & HOCK TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPA TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPAN TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINT TELEPHONE BUILDING-MAINT TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINT TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINT TELEPHONE SENIOR CITIZEN TELEPHONE POOL OPERATION TELEPHONE YORK FIRE STAT TELEPHONE CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE ART CENTER -BLD TELEPHONE ED ADMINISTRAT TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG /GRO TELEPHONE GOLF DOME TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE TELEPHONE 350869 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6338 186853 ART SUPPLY GIF COST OF GD SOL 9080 802 -8020 MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPLI 5689 802 -8020 PAVEMENT MARKI GENERAL SUPPLI 5001 Prof. Serv.:_,AC 112499 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES PT Maint. AC 112499 ART CENTER BLD PROF SERVICES Teaching AC 112499 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES Software 104091 ENGINEERING GE EQUIP REPLACEM 4508 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 02- DEC -1999 (13 ) page 9 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM -- - - - -- OBJECT - - -- -PO NUM ----------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 205493 12/07/99 $72.00 Doorways Interpreter Services 27918 CENT SVC GENER ADVERT PERSONL < *> _ $72.,00* 205494 12/07/99 205495 12/07/99 12/07/99 $4,028..13 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP Legal Fees $4,028.13* $180.00 Drackert, Linda $260.68 Drackert, Linda $440.68* 205496 12/07/99 $287.37 DRUMMOND AM CORP < *> 112499 $287.37* CRAFT SUPPLIES Grease, Rubber 205497 12/07/99 $67.00 Dunn, Deborah < *> $67.00* 205498 12/07/99 $8,162.00 E J MAYERS < * >. _ $8,162.00* 205500 12/07/99 $1,330.27 EAGLE WINE 12/07/99 $1,241.45 EAGLE WINE 12/07/99 $262.54 EAGLE WINE 12/07/99 - $26.56 EAGLE WINE 12/07/99 - $33.55 EAGLE WINE 12/07/99 $185.34 EAGLE WINE 12/07/99 $2,413.25 EAGLE WINE 12/07/99 $2,039.47 EAGLE WINE 12/07/99 $1,251.46 EAGLE WINE 12/07/99 $204.55 EAGLE WINE 12/07/99 $374.20 EAGLE WINE 12/07/99 $218.07 EAGLE WINE 12/07/99 $218.07 EAGLE WINE 12/07/99 $363.45 EAGLE WINE 12/07/99 $2,342.25 EAGLE WINE 12/07/99 $507.55 EAGLE WINE 12/07/99 $2,497.96 EAGLE WINE 12/07/99 $1,502.56 EAGLE WINE <*> $16,892.33* 205502 12/07/99 $1,816.40 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 12/07/99 $891.70 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 12/07/99 $6,822.90 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 12/07/99 $89.25 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 12/07/99 $1,190.00 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 12/07/99 - $23.30 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 12/07/99 $231.40 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 12/07/99 $3,652.40 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 12/07/99 $39.30 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 12/07/99 $3,920.55 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 12/07/99 $6,805.95 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 12/07/99 $5,148.95 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 12/07/99 $686.60 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 12/07/99 $1,057.95 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE 12/07/99 $890.00 EAST SIDE BEVERAGE < *> $33,220.05* 733958 LEGAL SERVICES PRO SVC - LEGA Teaching AC 112499 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES Craft Supplies 112499 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES Grease, Rubber Coatin 5387088 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 5086 Skating Class Refund 112499 Plastic Conduit Dir. 99123 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 132925 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 132929 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 132935 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 523508 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 523683 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 134543 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 136192 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 136196 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 136200 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 136202 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 136203 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 137112 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 137114 .COST OF -GOODS SOLD WI 137116 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 137826 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 139008 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 139010 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 140002 COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS Beer COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF. GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 547286 SOLD BE 547287 SOLD BE 547852 SOLD BE 547853 SOLD BE 547873 027072 SOLD BE 548436 SOLD BE 550288 SOLD MI 550289 SOLD BE 550290 SOLD BE 550865 SOLD BE.552122 SOLD BE 553562 SOLD BE 553576 SOLD BE 553912 ARENA-BLDG /GRO PRO SVC OTHER ENGINEERING GE PROF SERVICES 4532 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE FRED RICHARDS CST OF GDS BEE 9030 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 02- DEC -1999 (13:20) page 10 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM -------------------------------------------- 205503 12/07/99 $121.09 - - - - -- - -- ECOLAB PEST'ELIMINATION Pest Control 6395591 CENTENNIAL LAK SVC CONTR EQUI CONTRACT -. < *> $121.09* 205504 12/07/99 $100.00 EDINA CHAMBER OF COMMERC Chamber of. Commerce M 18212 ADMINISTRATION MEETING EXPENS < *> $1;00.00* 205505 12/07/99 $2,650.00 Edinborough Corporate Ce Patch & Sealcoat Park 78934 POOL TRACK GRE CONTR REPAIRS 4435 < *> $2,650.00* 205506 12/07/99 $337.00.• EDMUNDS, LIZ COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 111599 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 12/07/99 $45.92 EDMUNDS, LIZ COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 111899 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX < *> - $382.92* 205507 12/07/99 $250.00 Effective Marketing Comm About Town Article 227 COMMUNICATIONS MAG /NEWSLET EX < *> $250.00* 205508 12/07/99 $280.00 Electrical Installation Remove Pole /Haul to C 3021 ST LIGHTING OR GENERAL SUPPLI 5199 12/07/99 $280.00 Electrical Installation Remove Pole /Haul to C 3021 ST LIGHTING OR GENERAL S_UPPLI 5211 < *> $560.00* 205509 12/07/99 $134.73 ELVIN SAFETY Gas Badge 38911601 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 5145 < *> $134.73* 205510 12/07/99 $126.00 Emergency Physicians Pro Med. Exp. EB Accident 10453386 CONTINGENCIES PROF SERVICES < *> $126.00* 205511 12/07/99 $650.00 EMPLOYEES CLUB Supplies 120199 CONTINGENCIES GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $650.00* 205512 12/07/99 $45.00 Erhardt, Rhoda Media.Prof. Serv. AC 112499 MEDIA LAB PROF SERVICES < *> $45.00 *. 205513 12/07/99 $36.95 ERICKSON, MARY Art Work Sold at EAC 111899 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER - <*> $36.95* 205514 12/07/99 $200.00 Etcetera Music Program on 12/2 111899 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $200.00* 205515 12/07/99 $233.15 Fairview Southdale Hospi Med. Exp. -EB Accident 111799 CONTINGENCIES PROF SERVICES < *> $233.15* 205516 12/07/99 $90.03 FARBER, DIANE. Art Work Sold at EAC 111899 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $90.03* 205517 12/07/99 $49.74 Fast Foto & Digital Film & Developing 10 /31STM ED ADMINISTRAT GENERAL SUPPLI 2070 < *> $49.74* 205518 12/07/99 $45.00 FINE, AGNES Art Program on 12/19/ 111899 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $45.00* 205519 12/07/99 $97.13 Finsand, Bert Reimbursment- RotoRoot 110999 GENERAL(BILLIN CONTR REPAIRS < *> $97.13* 205520 12/07/99 $46.,00 Fireside Corner Canceled Permit 99005532 GENERAL FD PRO MECHAN PERMITS < *> $46.00* 02- DEC -1999 (13:. page 11 COUNCIL C CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM - - - -- OBJECT - - -- PO -NUM 205521 12/07/99 $125.19 --------------------------------------------------------------- Fowler Electric Repair'Parts 54896000 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 6252 < *> $125.19* 205522 12/07/99 $103.13 Frandrud, Angela Skating Instructor 111999 POOL TRACK GRE PROF SERVICES < *> $103:13* 205523 12/07/99 $67.69 Franklin Covey Supplies 70192125 ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $67.69* 205524. 12/07/99 $648.00 Frey, Michael Prof. Serv. AC 112499 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $648.00* 205525 12/07/99 $36.76 G & K DIRECT PURCHASE Clothing 3013457 PUMP & LIFT ST LAUNDRY < *> $36.76* 205526 12/07/99 $463.97 GE Capital Equip. Replace = Netw 90607401 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP REPLACEM 3054 12/07/99 $3,517.14 .ITS GE Capital ITS Equip Replace - Print 90607402 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP REPLACEM 3051 < *> $3,981.11* 205527 12/07/99 $300.00 GEISHEKER, PATRICIA Prof. Serv. AC 112499 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $300.00* 205528 12/07/99 $65.63 Georgantones, Despie Skating Instructor 1119.99 POOL TRACK GRE PROF SERVICES < *> $65.63* 205529 12/07/99 $74.10 GETSINGER, DONNA Art Work Sold at EAC 111899 ART "CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $74.10* 205530 12/07/99 $60.00 GLEN SIPE PIANO SERVICE Monthly Piano Service 991116 POOL TRACK GRE SVC CONTR EQUI CONTRACT < *> $60.00* 205531 12/07/99 $69.06 GOODMAN, NANCY Art. Work Sold at EAC 111899 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $69.06* 205532 12/07/99 $348.25 GOPHER STATE 1 CALL." Gopher State One Call 9100257 SUPERV. & OVRH GOPHER STATE < *> $348.25* 205533 12/07/99 $58.50 Gossman; Bill Art Work Sold at EAC 111899 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $58.50* 205534 12/07/99 $418.99 GRAINGER Dome Supplies 498 -1125 GOLF DOME GENERAL SUPPLI 6241 12/07/99 $491.02 GRAINGER Tank Top and Portable 495 -3890 PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPLI 5137 12/07/99 $23.87 GRAINGER Photocell 498 -3564 POOL TRACK GRE GENERAL SUPPLI 2199 12/07/99 $362.18., GRAINGER Tank Top Heaters 937 -3890 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 5137 12/07/99 $2,674.22 GRAINGER Tank Top Heaters 937 -4557 PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPLI .5975 12/07/99 $40.65 GRAINGER Nema 3R Enclosure 498 -9391 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 5210 12/07/99 $7.03 GRAINGER Safety Sign 498 -9391 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 5210 12/07/99 $11.06 GRAINGER Aircraft Drill 973 -4576 GENERAL MAINT TOOLS 5950 < *> $4,029.02* 205535 12/07/99 $225.00 Grand Pere Wines Inc COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 00006483 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $380.00 Grand Pere Wines Inc COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 00006549,50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD.WINE 12/07/99 $415.00 Grand Pere Wines Inc - COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 00006195 50TH'ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE < *> $1,020.00* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 02- DEC - 1999 (13:20) page 12 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM -- - - - - - - 205536 - - - - - - - - - - 12/07/9.9 - - - - - - - - - - - - - $752.00 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD-WI 27520 50TH-ST SELLIN CST OF GD --------------- WINE -- 12/07/99 $477.00 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC COST -OF GOODS SOLD WI 27685 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $228.00 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 27686 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $837.00 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 27687 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $85.00. GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 27699 . VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $924.00 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 27868 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $585.00 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 27965 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $314.00 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 27967_ SOTH ST SELLIN CST OF GD-WINE < *> $4,202.00 *' 205537 12/07/99 $10.26 GRAUSAM, STEVE Cell Phone Charges fo 112399 YORK OCCUPANCY TELEPHONE < *> $10.26* 205538 12/07/99 $182.88 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. Ceiling Fan 104 -6030 POOL TRACK GRE GENERAL SUPPLI 2190 12/07/99 $721.59 GRAYBAR .ELECTRIC CO. Fixture Lens 104 -6137 PARKING RAMP REPAIR PARTS 5076 12/07/99 $286.34 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. Bulbs 104 -6158 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI 2059 12/07/99 $316.37 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. Bulbs 104 -6166 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI 2059 < *> $1,507.18* 205539 12/07/99 $395.00 GREATER MINNEAPOLIS CONV Membership Dues 05840 ED ADMINISTRAT DUES & SUBSCRI 2063 < *> '$395.00* 205540 12/07/99 $9.38 Green, Chelsea Skating Instructor 111999 POOL TRACK GRE PROF SERVICES < *> $9.38* 205541 12/07/99 $210.00 GRIFFITHS, GEORDIE Prof. Serv. AC 112499 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $210:00* 205544 12/07/99 - $36.55. GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 522916 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 - $672.70 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 523279 VERNON SELLING CST OF,GD LIQU 12/07/99 - $246.61 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 523293 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 12/07/99 $90.37 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD MI.132927 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 12/07/99 $3,031.46 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 132928 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $361.65 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 132931 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 12/07/99 $1,244.71 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 132932 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 12/07/99 $27.54 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 132933 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 12/07/99 $26:25 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST.OF GOODS SOLD WI 132937 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $2;630.05 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST -OF GOODS SOLD LI 132938 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 12/07/99 - $230.50 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 524012 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 12/07/99 $216.85 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 136194 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 12/07/99 $3,388.91 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 136195 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 12/07/99 $2,040.78 GRIGGS COOPER &.CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 136198 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 12/07/99 $28.55 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 136201 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 12/07/99 $26.25 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 136205 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 12/07/99 $3,310.12 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 136206 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 12/07/99 $244.37 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF•GOODS SOLD LI 138154 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 12/07/99 $281.21 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS.SOLD LI 138156 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 12/07/99 $271.64 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 138157 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 12/07/99 $2,448.77 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 138831 50TH.ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 12/07/99 $90.69 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 138832 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 12/07/99 $6,970.33 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 138833 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 12/07/99 $80.31 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 138834 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 12/07/99 $284.80 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 138835 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 12/07/99 $26.39 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 139012 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $55.21 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 139521 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 02- DEC -1999 (13:-_, page 13 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM -_- OBJECT-- -- - -PO -NUM_ 205544 12/07/99 $3,508.33 ----------------------------------------------------------------- GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 139522 VERNON.SELLING SELLING CST OF GD LIQU CST OF GD LIQU 12/07/99 $341.28 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI COST OF GOODS.,SOLD MI 139523 139524 VERNON VERNON SELLING CST.OF GDS MIX 12/07/99 $27.68 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. < *> $29,868.14* 205545 12/07/99 ;$38.95 GTE Directories Corporat Advertising 11/03 11/16 ART CENTER ADM GOLF DOME ADVERT OTHER ADVERT OTHER 8256 12/07/99 $11.50 GTE Directories Corporat Sun Direct Ad . < *> $50.45* 205546 12/07/99 $180.00 Guest Services Inc Meals- #60_NFA 325760 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONF & SCHOOLS 3599 < *> $180.00* 205547 12/07/99 $92.30 Guest, Lisa Art Work Sold at EAC 111899 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $92.30* 205548 12/07/99 $63.99 Gustafson, Karen Craft Supplies 112499 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES < *> $63.99* 205549 12/07/99 $147.35 H &L MESABI Main Blade 042698 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 5729 < *> $147.35* 205550 12/07/99 $131.53 Hamco Data Products General Supplies 998666 998882 LIQUOR 50TH ST VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL SUPPLI GENERAL SUPPLI 1932, 1934 12/07/99 $66.60 Hamco Data Products Register Ribbons < *> $198.13* 205551 12/07/99 $34.50 Hammond, Abigail Continuing Education .111899 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $34.50* 205552 12/07/99 $31.20 HANNA, JUNE Art Work Sold at EAC 111899 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER <*> $31.20* 205553 12/07/99 $71.78 HAROLD CHEVROLET Bracket 401000VW EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5298 < *> $71..78* 205554 12/07/99 $93.75 Hartley, Kimber Skating Instructor 111999 POOL TRACK GRE PROF SERVICES < *> $93.75* 205555 12/07/99 $336.00 HAYNES, PATRICIA Teaching AC 112499 112499- ART CENTER ADM ART CNTR PROG PROF SERVICES MACH. & EQUIP 12/07/99 12/07/99 $729.75 $204.43 HAYNES, PATRICIA HAYNES, PATRICIA Wall Unit AC Misc. Supplies AC 112499 ART SUPPLY GIF GENERAL SUPPLI 12/07/99 $684.00 HAYNES, PATRICIA Gallery PT AC 112499 ART SUPPLY GIF PROF SERVICES < *> $1,954.18* 205556 12/07/99 $388.00 HAYWA, PHYLLIS Prof. Serv. AC. 112499 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $388.00* 205557 12/07/99 $69.79 HEDBERG AGGREGATES Rock 148411,1 POOL TRACK GRE GENERAL SUPPLI 2131' < *> $69.79* 205558 12/07/99 $408.00 HEIM, HARRY Prof. Serv. AC 112499 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES 12/07/99 $288.00 HEIM, HARRY Model Fee, 112499 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES < *> $696.00* 205559 12/07/99 $134.10 HEIMARK FOODS Meat 013968 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 9032 . < *> $134.10* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 02- DEC -1999 (13:20) 14' CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE. PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------ 205560 12/07/99 $75.00 ------------------------ Hemmingway, Steve- ---------------------------------------------------------------- AC Instruction 111599 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES 12/07/99 $75 -.00 Hemmingway, Steve Teaching'AC 112499 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $150.00* 205561 12/07/99 $125.20.. HENNEPIN.COUNTY MEDICAL Amb. Supplies - ,Sept. 7755' FIRE DEPT. GEN_FIRST AID SUPP 9773 < *> $125.20* 205562 12/07/99 $292.56 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURE Postal Verification 110999 ELECTION POSTAGE < *> $29.2.56* .205563 12/07/99 $14,733.40 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURE Prof. Eng. Serv. 28011 GENERAL STORM PROF SERVICES WRITTEN < *> $14,7.33.40* 205564 12/07/99 $100.00 HENNESSY, MICHAEL Performance on 11/26/ 112399. ED'ADMINISTRAT PRO. SVC OTHER < *> $100.00* 205565 12/07/99 - $34.91 HIRSHFIELDS HD White 509026 D CITY HALL GENE REPAIR PARTS 5267 12/07/99 $34.91 HIRSHFIELDS Duplicate 509026A CITY HALL GENE REPAIR PARTS V #203140 12/07/99 $36.38 HIRSHFIELDS Paint, Tape 02016950 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 5900 < *> $36.38* 205566 $1,386.67 Ho, Jeffery D' Medical Director Sery 120199 FIRE DEPT. GEN PROF SERVICES < *> _12/07/99 $1,386.67* 205567 12/07/99 $340.00 Hodges, Trish Prof. Serv. Media 112499 MEDIA LAB PROF SERVICES < *> $340.00* 205568 12/07/99 $304.70 Hoel, Judy Skating Instructor 111999 POOL TRACK GRE PROF .SERVICES < *> $304.70* 205569 12/07/99 $262.50 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP -20/20 Vision Plan 110999 CONTINGENCIES PROF-SERVICES < *> $262.50* 205570 12/07/99 $58.52 Home Enviroment Center Water_Filtration 2368 CITY HALL GENE'CONTR REPAIRS 4534 < *> $58.52* 205571 12/07/99 $28.50 Home Juice COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 46936 VERNON SELLING:CST OF GDS MIX < *> $28.50* 205572 12/07/99 $76.68 HOOTENS Laundry 101999_ POLICE DEPT. G LAUNDRY < *> $76.68* 205573 12/'07/99 $49.40 Houk_, Denise Art Work'Sold at EAC 111899 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $49.40* 205574 12/07/99 $46.05 HOULE, WAYNE D. Meeting - Lunch 111599 ENGINEERING GE MEETING,EXPENS < *> $46.05* 205575 12/07/99 $140.63 Houston, Chris Skating Instructor 111999 POOL TRACK GRE PROF SERVICES < *> $140.63* 205576 12/07/99 $49.33 HUEBSCH Towels, Rags 903894 POOL TRACK GRE SVC CONTR EQUI CONTRACT 12/07/99 $59.10 HUEBSCH Towels, Mat - Cleanin 908538 POOL TRACK GRE SVC CONTR EQUI CONTRACT 12/07/99 $9.03 HUEBSCH Towels, Linen Bags 913108, POOL TRACK GRE SVC CONTR EQUI CONTRACT < *> $117.46* COUNCIL CHECK JISTER 02- DEC -1999 (13 page 15 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM- _- - - - - -- OBJECT-- - - - -PO -NUM --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 205577 12/07/99 $360.00 Hughes, David Prof. Serv. - Model 112499 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $360.00* 205578 12/07/99 $53.25 Hugo's Tree.Care Forestry Work. 1022 TREES & MAINTE PROF SERVICES 5904 < *> $53.25* 205579 12/07/99 $114.17 HYDRAULIC COMPONENT SERV Recond. & Test Snow P 14199 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5171 < *> $114.17* 205580 12/07/99 $1,149.18 HYDRO SUPPLY CO Water Meters 15611 UTILITY PROG INVENTORY WATE 3671 12/.07/99 $468.45 HYDRO SUPPLY CO Water Meters 15612 UTILITY -PROG INVENTORY WATE 3671 12/07/99 $1,770.80 HYDRO SUPPLY CO Water Meters 15638 _ UTILITY PROG INVENTORY WATE 3671 12/07/99 _ $1,178.38 HYDRO SUPPLY CO Water Meters 15639 UTILITY PROG INVENTORY WATE 3671 < *> $4,566.81* 205581 12/07/99 $1,152.00 IBM.CORPORATION Service Contract - AS 09C8987 POLICE G SVC CONTR EQUI < *> $1,152.00* 205582 12/07/99 $66.25 Ikon Office Solutions Fax Toner Cartridge 2309342A CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI 4528 12/07/99 $28.00 Ikon Office Solutions Copies 23499546 EQUIPMENT OPER DATA PROCESSIN 5258 < *> $94.25* 205583 12/07/99 $31.42 INDELCO PLASTIC CORP PVC Fittings 194856 FIELD MAINTENA REPAIR PARTS 5100 < *> $31.42* 205584 12/07/99 $78.29 Interlight Repair Parts 5053380 MEDIA LAB REPAIR PARTS 9079 12/07/99 $64.79 Interlight Repair Parts - 5053381 MEDIA LAB REPAIR PARTS 9079 < *> $143.08* 205585 12/07/99 $139.63 IOS Capital Copy Machine Lease 45655101 EQUIPMENT OPER DATA PROCESSIN 5258 < *> $139.63* 205586 12/07/99 $1,398.51 IVERSON, KATHY Operation Expense Rei 102599 EDINA CHEM_AWA GENERAL SUPPLI 12/07/99 $2,000.00 IVERSON, KATHY Winning Edge Seminars 112299 COMMUNICATIONS PROF SERVICES < *> $3,398.51* 205587 12/07/99 $215.33 J.H. LARSON COMPANY Fuse Reducer, Lamps, 4145440- CITY HALL GENE GENERAL SUPPLI 5093 12/07/99 $901.01 J.H. LARSON COMPANY Lamps 4148458- PARKING RAMP REPAIR PARTS 5206 < *> $1,116.34* 205588 12/07/99 $62.29 JACK RICHESON & CO INC Cost of.Goods Sold 0153476- ART SUPPLY GIF COST OF GD SOL 9067 < *> $62.29* 205589 12/07/99 $100.00 JAMES, WILLIAM F Police Service 120199 RESERVE PROGRA CONTR SERVICES < *> $100.00* 205590 12/07/99 $140.25 Jerde, Kenneth-O Supervise Delivery E1 11129.9 ELECTION PROF SERVICES 12/07/99 $21.13 Jerde, Kenneth 0 Mileage 111299 ELECTION MILEAGE < *> $161.38* 205591 12/07/99 $476.63 JERRY'S PRINTING Inspection Request Fo A -10896 INSPECTIONS PRINTING 12/07/99 $358.91 JERRY'S PRINTING Printing A -12275 ART CENTER ADM PRINTING 9105 < *> $835.54* 205592 12/07/99 $267.22 JIM HATCH-SALES Shovels, Brooms, Hand 9871 GENERAL MAINT TOOLS - 5135 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 02- DEC -1999 (13:20) page 16 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------=- <*> $267.22* 205598 12/07/99 - $28.50 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 104110 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 - $75.65 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 104484 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 - $116.50 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 104485 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 - $13.77 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 104486 YORK SELLING CST.OF GD WINE 12/07/99 -$4.82 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 104487 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 - $4.81 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 104488 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 -$5.51 JOHNSON,.BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 104489 YORK _SELLING CST OF GD WINE . 12/07/99 -$7.66 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 104760 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 12/07/9.9 -$7.66 JOHNSON. BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 104761 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 - $15.60 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 104762 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 12/07/99 -$6.19 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 104763 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 12/07/99 - $16.04 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 104764 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 - $26..64 JOHNSON'_ BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 104765 YORK .SELLING CST OF GD'-LIQU 12/07/99 =$6.74 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 104766 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 12/07/99 -$5.91 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 104767 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 12/07/99 -$6.87 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 104768 YORK'SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 12/07/99 - $85.60 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 105077 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 -$6.72 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 105078 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 - $14.07 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 105079 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 12/07/99 - $96.65 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS.SOLD WI 105683 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 - $99.35 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 105684 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 - $63.65 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 105685 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 12/07/99 - $133.20 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 105686 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 12/07/99 -$6.87 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 105687 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 - $6.32. JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 105872 YORK SELLING. CST OF GD LIQU 12/07/99 $3,277.23: JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1045232. VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 12/07/99 $1,255.47 JOHNSON BROTHERS. LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1045233 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 12/07/99 $142.20 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1045234 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $4,186.04 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST'OF GOODS SOLD LI 1045235 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 12/07/99 $261.05 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1045236 YORK SELLING" CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $265.95 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1045237 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 12/07/99 $1,022.54 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 104.5238 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99• $3,403.75 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1045240 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $326.48 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1045241 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $1,061.25 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST, OF GOODS SOLD WI 1045243 .50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $1,242.80 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1045244 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $3,029.70 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS.SOLD WI 1045245 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 - $5.51. JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF.GOODS SOLD WI 105987 YORK SELLING -CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 - $116.50 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 105988 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 - $65.64. JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 106262.. YORK SELLING CST OF.GD LIQU 12/07/99 ,$5,441.51 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1047902 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 12/07/99 $2,216.63 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1047903 50TH ST SELLIN'_CST OF GD LIQU 12/07/99 $203.55 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1047904 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $94.80 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1047905 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $3,117.46 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1047906 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 12/07/99 $143.25 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1047907 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $404.94 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1047908 -50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 12/07/99 $910.70 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1047909, 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $1,550.22 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1047910 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 12/07/99 $1,694.93 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1047911 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $807.42 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1047912 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 12/07./99 $5,547.77 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1047913 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 - $82.43 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1064,93 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU COUNCIL.CHECK . 1ISTER 02- DEC -1999 (13. page 17 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM ---------OBJECT -----PO -NUM -- ----------------------------------------- 205598 12/07/99 $448.00 JOHNSON BROTHERS ------------------------------------------------- LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1048746 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 12/07/99 $130.75 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD.WI 1048747 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $1,011.74 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1049254, 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 12/07/99 $173.05 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1049255 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $3,515.76 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF.GOODS SOLD LI 1049256 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 12/07/99 $106.56 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1049257 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 12/07/99 $759.50 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD.WI 1049258 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $1,669.85 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1049259 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $4,875.56 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1049260 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $1,149.13 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1050099 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 12/07/99 $274.95 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1050100 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 12/07/99 $282.85 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 1050101 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 12/07/99 $1,476.47 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1050102 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $107.50 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1050364 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $56,457.91* 205599 12/07/99 $117.40 JOHNSON, NAOMI Craft Supplies AC 112499 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES 12/07/99 $20.85 JOHNSON, NAOMI Maint. Gen. Supplies 112499 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI 12/07/99 $42.14 JOHNSON, NAOMI Media Gen. Supplies A 112499 MEDIA LAB GENERAL SUPPLI 12/07/99 $14.28 JOHNSON, NAOMI Gen. Supplies 112499 ART CENTER ADM GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $194.67* 205600 12/07/99 $360.00 Johnson, Ric Prof. Serv. AC 112499 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $360.00* 205601 12/07/99 $100.00 JOHNSON, WALTER Police Service 120199 RESERVE PROGRA CONTR SERVICES < *> $100.00* 205602 12/07/99 $16.46 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY OF GOLD Adaptor 157427 CITY HALL GENE REPAIR PARTS 5071 < *> $16.46* 205603 12/07/99 $75.98 JULIEN, DIANE Mileage to Arneson Ac 111999 EQUIPMENT OPER LIC & PERMITS 12/07/99 $2.48 JULIEN, DIANE Mileage to AAA 111999 EQUIPMENT OPER LIC & PERMITS 12/07/99 $6.07 JULIEN, DIANE UPS Charges 111999 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $84.53* 205604 12/07/99 $36.00 JUSTUS LUMBER Wood 31008 BUILDING MAINT LUMBER 5096 < *> $36.00* 205605 205606 205608 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 $75.00 $75.00* $9.49 $113.96. $123.45* - $57.48 $678.30 $797.90 $87.20 $796.75 $92.50 $280.20 $1,568.15 $937.80 Kalin, Jeremy Nudell Teaching AC 112499 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES KINKO'S KINKO'S Kiwi Kai Imports Inc Kiwi Kai Imports Inc Kiwi Kai Imports Inc Kiwi Kai Imports Inc Kiwi Kai Imports Inc Kiwi Kai Imports Inc Kiwi Kai Imports Inc Kiwi Kai Imports Inc Kiwi Kai Imports Inc Photographic 06220002 POLICE DEPT. G PHOTO'SUPPLIES Punch Cards, Season P 06220002 ED ADMINISTRAT PRINTING 2202 COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI SOLD WI SOLD WI SOLD BE SOLD WI SOLD BE SOLD WI SOLD WI SOLD WI CM1028A 119310 119311 119312 119313 119314 CM1110 119705 119706 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 02- DEC -1999 (13:20) page 18 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM --------------------------------------------------------------------------.---------------------------------------------------------- 205608 12/07/99 $898.40 Kiwi Kai Imports Inc COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 119707 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $219.00. Kiwi Kai Imports Inc COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 119776 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $219.00 Kiwi Kai Imports Inc COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 119777 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $1,123.45 Kiwi Kai Imports Inc COST OF GOODS SOLD W.I. 120051 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $924.80 Kiwi Kai Imports Inc COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 120052 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $1,158.10 Kiwi Kai Imports Inc COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 120224 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $54.00 Kiwi Kai Imports Inc COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 120225 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/07/99 $376.00 Kiwi Kai Imports Inc COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 120283 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $160.80 Kiwi Kai Imports Inc COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 120346 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE < *> $10,314.87* 205609 12/07/99 $11.88 KLIER'S NURSERY INC Sod 16608 FIELD MAINTENA SOD & DIRT 5447 205610 12/07/99 $67.00, Knowlton, David Skating Class Refund 112499 ARENA BLDG /GRO PRO SVC OTHER < *> $67.00* 205611 12/07/99 $85.19 KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT Replace Pad, Blade, H 0217 -403 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 5893 12/07/99 $162.64 KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT Hammer, Tape Measure, 0217 -403 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 5094 12/07/99 $55.81 KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT Rakes. 0217 -403 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 5892 12/07/99 $40.26 KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT Concrete 0217- 403 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 5896 12/07/99 $85.69 KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT Concrete, Lumber 0217 -403 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 5897 12/07/99 $29.54 KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT Lumber, Bulbs, Sledge 0217 -404 GENERAL MAINT TOOLS 5198 < *> $459.13* 205612 12/07/99 $167.20 KOCH, C. ROBERT Supervise Delivery E1 111299 ELECTION PROF SERVICES 12/07/99 $48.10 KOCH, C. ROBERT Mileage 111299 ELECTION MILEAGE < *> $215.30* 205613 12/07/99 $276.00 KOCHENASH, RICK Teaching AC 112499 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $276.00* 205614 12/07/99 $67.60 Kovack, Orlean Art Work Sold at EAC 111899 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $67.60* 205615 12/07/99 $42.60 KREMER SPRING & ALIGNMEN 5/8" U Bolts 092511 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR_PARTS 5167 < *> $42.60* 205616 12/07/99 $761.50 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 253477 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 12/07/99 $28.90 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 253478 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX . 12/07/99 $1,457.00 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 253597 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/07/99 $1,174.15 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 254088 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 12/07/99 $36.00 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 254089 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 12/07/99 $2,177.60 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 254164. YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/07/99 $14.45 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 254166 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 12/07/99 $243.15. KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 254493 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE < *> $5,•892.75* 205617 12/07/99 $221.30 KUNDE CO INC Oak Wilt Control Prog 6052 TREES & MAINTE PROF SERVICES CONTRACT < *> $221.30* 205618 12/07/99 $29.72 KUYPER, SCOTT Continuing Education 112299 POLICE DEPT. G CONF &SCHOOLS < *> $29.72* 205619 12/07/99 $331.50 LABOR RELATIONS ASSOCIAT Fee For Service 090199 ADMINISTRATION PROF.SERVICES COUNCIL CHECK — ISTER 02- DEC -1999 (13. page 19 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ <*> $331.50* 205620 12/07/99 $415.35 LAKELAND FLORIST Trees 346416 POOL TRACK GRE GENERAL SUPPLI 2218 < *> $415.35* 205621 12/07/99 $16.32 LEEF BROS. INC. Towels 120961 MAINT OF LOURS LAUNDRY 12/07/99 $47.58 LEEF BROS. INC. Office Furnishings 127116 ART CENTER BLD LAUNDRY 12/07/99 $16.21 LEEF BROS. INC. Towels 129880 MAINT OF COURS LAUNDRY < *> $80.11* 205622 12/07/99 $359.61 LEITNER COMPANY Top Dressing 163284 RICHARDS MAINT SOD & DIRT 1317 12/07/99 $408.17 LEITNER COMPANY Soil Mix 164089 CENTENNIAL LAK FERTILIZER 2056 12/07/99 $408.17 LEITNER COMPANY Soil Mix 167214 CENTENNIAL LAK FERTILIZER 2056 12/07/99 $408.17 LEITNER COMPANY Greens Soil Mix 164186 CENTENNIAL LAK FERTILIZER 2065 < *> $1,584.12* 205623 12/07/99 $225.00 LIEBER, JUDY Gift Shop Prof. Serv. 112499 ART SUPPLY GIF PROF SERVICES < *> $225.00* 205624 12/07/99 $39.65 Liebo, Jack Art Work Sold at EAC 111899 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $39.65* 205625 12/07/99 $100.00 Life Link III Gen'l & Ad Registration - Semina TT9119 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $100.00* 205626 12/07/99 $499.48 LINE -X Spray Liner 1556 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5176 < *> $499.48* 205627 12/07/99 $12.00 LINHOFF Photo Finishing 62760 FIRE DEPT. GEN PHOTO SUPPLIES 3587 12/07/99 $62.00 LINHOFF Photo Finishing 00063550 FIRE DEPT. GEN PHOTO SUPPLIES 3587 < *> $74.00* 205628 12/07/99 $285.07 LONG LAKE TRACTOR & EQUI Hose Assembly 9089 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5053 < *> $285.07* 205629 12/07/99 $100.00 LONNING, CAROLYN Performance on 12/30/ 111899 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $100.00* 205630 12/07/99 $125.00 LSI Books and Pamphlets 112599 POLICE DEPT. G BOOKS & PAMPHL 5053 < *> $125.00* 205631 12/07/99 $25.32 LUBE -TECH Shop Supplies 156297 -0 MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPLI 6248 < *> $25.32* 205632 12/07/99 $89.97 LUTZ, R. MICHAEL Uniform - Clothing Al 112599 POLICE DEPT. G UNIF ALLOW < *> $89.97* 205633 12/07/99 $12.00 M. SHANKEN COMMUNICATION Dues & Subscriptions STMT 10/ LIQUOR 50TH ST DUES & SUBSCRI < *> $12.00* 205634 12/07/99 $60.00 MACA ACO General Supplies 112599 ANIMAL CONTROL GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $60.00* 205635 12/07/99 $112.50 Macari, Stacie Skating Instructor 111999 POOL TRACK GRE PROF SERVICES < *> $112.50* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 02- DEC -1999 (13:20) page 20 CHECK NO DATE C CHECK AMOUNT V VENDOR D DESCRIPTION I INVOICE P PROGRAM O OBJECT P PO NUM ----------------------------------------------- - ------------=------------------------------------------------------------------------ 205637 12/07/99 205638 12/07/99 < *> 205639 12/07/99 205643 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99, 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 .12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 $781.57 Mail Boxes Etc $781.57* $304.70 Mairs, Candyce $304.70* $26.29 MAKELA, BARB $2.6.29* -$6.00 - $12.80 - $40.25 -$1.00 $79:95 $346.70 $18.65 $435.45 $1,421.30 $55.20 - $20.00 $1,594.80 $18.40 $993.52. $41.60 $43.50 $598.90 $581.10 $62.90 $192.00 $36.80 $18.40 $2,405.65 $1,611.90 $36.80 $127.45 $92.00 $163.00 $1,142.87 $9.00 $3,080.85 $10.10 $57.0.0 $1,161.60 $9.00 $18..65 $1,603.40 $525.50 $1,625.55 MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII•SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK.VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES Color Copying 110399 CENT SVC GENER PROF SERVICES 4484 Skating Instructor 111999 POOL TRACK GRE PROF SERVICES Art Work Sold at EAC 111899 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 916476A COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 929819A COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 929820A COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 940611A COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 969048 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 969179 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 969180 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 969181 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 969198 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 969199 Beer 023066 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 971539 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 971540 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 971541 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 971542 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 971543 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 971679 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 971680 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 971681 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 971682 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE, 971683 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 971684 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 971775 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 971792 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 971793 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 971794 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 971797 Beer 973664 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 974305 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 974306 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 974307 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 974308 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 974309 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 974319 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 974320 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 974728 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 974729 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 974730 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 974750 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE FRED RICHARDS CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 50TH ST. SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX GRILL CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE YORK•SELLING CST OF GDS MIX VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 9034 9034 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 916476A COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 929819A COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 929820A COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 940611A COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 969048 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 969179 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 969180 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 969181 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 969198 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 969199 Beer 023066 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 971539 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 971540 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 971541 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 971542 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 971543 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 971679 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 971680 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 971681 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 971682 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE, 971683 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 971684 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 971775 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 971792 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 971793 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 971794 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 971797 Beer 973664 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 974305 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 974306 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 974307 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 974308 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 974309 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 974319 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 974320 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 974728 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 974729 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 974730 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 974750 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE FRED RICHARDS CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 50TH ST. SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX GRILL CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE YORK•SELLING CST OF GDS MIX VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 9034 9034 COUNCIL CHECK-.._jISTER 02- DEC -1999 (13. page 21 -CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM --------------------------------------------------_---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 205643 12/07/99 $18.00 MARK -VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 974751 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 12/07/99 $92.00 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 974752 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 12/07/99 $80.00 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 974916 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE _ 12/07/99 $1,402.85 MARK VII SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 976679 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE < *> $21,732.49* 205644 12/07/99 $35.00 Martin, Kim Art Program on 12/23/ 111899 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $35.00* 205645 12/07/99 $129.63 MATHISON CO, THE Paper, Brush 186683 -0 ART SUPPLY GIF COST OF GD SOL.9097 < *> $129.63* 205646 12/07/99 $260.93 Matrix'Communications In Service & New Phone 39344 FINANCE GENERAL SUPPLI 12/07/99 $49.00 Matrix Communications In Service & New Phone 39344 SVC GENER TELEPHONE < *> $309.93* 205647 12/07/99 $50.00 Matt's Auto Service Inc Tow Service - Open Ho 23713 FIRE DEPT. GEN PROF'SERVICES 12/07/99 $50.00 M_att's Auto Service Inc- Tow Service - Open Ho 23714 FIRE DEPT. GEN PROF SERVICES < *> $100.00* 205648 12/07/99 $679.89 MCCAREN DESIGN Plants, Flowers 11481 POOL TRACK GRE TREES FLWR SHR 2197 12/07/99 $975:96 MCCAREN DESIGN Plants, Flowers 11484 POOL TRACK GRE TREES FLWR SHR 2204 <. *> $1,655.85* 205649 12/07/99 $15.75 MCKENZIE, TOM Uniform Allowance 112599 POLICE DEPT. G UNIF ALLOW < *> $15.75* 205650 12/07/99. $171.95 MCM Electronics General Supplies 910693 MEDIA LAB GENERAL SUPPLI 9083 < *> $171.95* 205651 12/07/99 $153.07 MCNEILUS STEEL Al Troplt 0151778 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5173 12/07/99 $698.27 MCNEILUS STEEL Steel Pipe 0153264 PUMP & LIFT ST REPAIR PARTS 5179 < *> $851.34* 205652 12/07/99 $951.15 MDS Matrx Medical.Inc Ambulance Supplies 682477 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 3600 12/07/99 $26.14 MDS Matrx Medical Inc Ambulance Supplies 683308 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 3600 12/07/99 $5.28 MDS Matrx Medical Inc Ambulance Supplies 683874 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 3600 < *> $982.57* 205653 12/07/99 $368.00 Medtox Fee for Service 10997911 CENT.SVC GENER PROF SERVICES < *> $368.00* 205654 12/07/99 $98.59 MENARDS. ACCT #35170288 Xmas Supplies 5227 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI 2061 12/07/99 $30.32 MENARDS. ACCT 435170288 Cleaning Supplies 5885 CENTENNIAL LAK CLEANING SUPPL 2069 12/07/99 $21.63 MENARDS ACCT #35170288 Xmas Decorations 6368 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI 2069 < *> $150.54* 20.5655 12/07/99 $209.81 MENARDS * ACCT #30240251 Snow Stakes 57088 PATHS & HARD S GENERAL SUPPLI 5114 12/07/99 $6.26 MENARDS * ACCT 430240251 Door Part 57677 CLUB HOUSE REPAIR PARTS 6292 < *> $216.07* 205656 12/07/99 $100.00 MERFELD,.BURT, Police Service 120199 RESERVE PROGRA CONTR SERVICES < *> $100.00* 205657 12/07/99 $151.98 MERIT SUPPLY Pre- Spray, Strip Wash 52261 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 5898 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 02- DEC -1999 (13:20) page 22 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT. VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM -----------------------_------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 205657 12/07/99 $992.85 MERIT- SUPPLY General Supply 52272 ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPLI 8071 12/07/.99 $.233.50 MERIT SUPPLY' Cleaning Supplies 52279 ART CENTER BLD CLEANING SUPPL 9085 12/07/99 $190.79 MERIT SUPPLY Red Pads, Carpet Sham 52325 YORK OCCUPANCY REPAIR PARTS 5215 12/07/99: $981.24 MERIT SUPPLY Cleaning Supplies 52335 ARENA BLDG /GRO CLEANING SUPPL 8073 12/07/99 $202.60 MERIT SUPPLY Bevel Bues, Tiles 52354 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 5078 12/07/99 $360.32 MERIT SUPPLY Golf Car Cleaner 52358 GOLF CARS GENERAL SUPPLI 6254 " 12/07/99 $56.2.48 MERIT SUPPLY Shampoo, Towels 52359 POOL TRACK "GRE.CLEANING SUPPL 2209 12/07/99 $213.32 MERIT SUPPLY Tissues, Soaps 52360 PW BUILDING CLEANING SUPPL '5261 12/07/99 $179.99. MERIT SUPPLY' Wypall, Towels 52368 STREET NAME SI GENERAL SUPPLI 5263 < *> $4,069.07* 265658 12/07/99 $106.00 Merrill, Ann Millennium Baskets 1001 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 5114 12/.07/99 $106.00 Merrill, Ann Millennium Baskets 1002 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX < *> $212.00* 205659 12/07/99 $111.50 Metro Volley Ball Offici Officiating Fees 110999- EDINA ATHLETIC PROF SERVICES 12/07/99 $123.00 Metro - Volley Ball Offici Officiating Fees 11 -1699 EDINA ATHLETIC PROF SERVICES < *> $234.50* 205660 12/07/99 $266,798.9.3 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENV Sewer Service 695021 SEWER TREATMEN SEWER SVC METR < *> $266,798.93 *, 205661 12/07/99 $5,040. 00 Metropolitan Council SAC for Oct. 99 111599 GENERAL FD PRO SAC CHARGES < *> $5,040.00* 205662 12/07/99 $123.50 METZGER, MAURE ANN Art Work Sold at EAC 111899 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $123.50* 205663 12/07/99 $679.77 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP Asphalt 67648MB DISTRIBUTION BLACKTOP 5143 < *.> $679.77* 205664 1.2/07/99 $43.67 MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPLY Cleaning Supplies 18014 ART.SUPPLY GIF CLEANING SUPPL < *> $43.67* - 205665 12/07/,99 $85.60 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 62187188 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX. 12/07/99 $128.70 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 60098049 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 12/07/99 $98.20 MIDWEST'COCA -COLA BOTTLI Coke 67011042 GRILL - COST OF GD SOL 9046 12/07/99 $503.80 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 62189085 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 12/07/99 $382.79 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 65836120 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 12/07/99 $153.00 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI Coke 67016124 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 9046 12/07/99 $47.50 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI Coke 67016132 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 9046 12/07/99 $114.32 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 62191032 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX. < *> $1,513.91* 205666. 12/07/99 $10,573.74 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPA Water Purchased 111799 DISTRIBUTION WATER PURCHASE < *> $10,573.74* 205667 12/07/99 $63.90 MINNESOTA CLAY USA Cost of Goods Sold. 51853 ART SUPPLY GIF COST OF GD SOL 12/07/99 $136.40 MINNESOTA CLAY USA Craft Supplies 51853 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES < *> $200.30* 205668 12/07/99 $37.71 Minnesota Department of Concrete Plant Inspec PA000029 SIDEWALK -MAPLE CIP < *> $37.71* 205669 12/07/99 $9.5.00 MINNESOTA SAFETY COUNCIL Registration - Trench 77922 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONF & SCHOOLS 3596 02- DEC -1999 (13: page 23 COUNCIL CHECK N_4ISTER CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - INVOICE - - - - - - - - - PROGRAM - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OBJECT- - -PO -NUM 205669 12/07/99 -- $95.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MINNESOTA SAFETY COUNCIL - - - - - Registration - Trench 77938 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONF & SCHOOLS 3596 < *> $190.00* 205670 12/07/99 $96.00 MINNESOTA STATE FIRE CHI 2 -Yr. Renewal Magazin 111799 FIRE DEPT. GEN DUES & SUBSCRI < *> $96.00* 205671 12/.07/99 $5,013.19 MINNESOTA STATE TREASURE Sur Charge Oct. 99 111599 GENERAL FD PRO SURTAX. < *> $5,013.19* 205672 12/07/99 $20.77 MINNESOTA WANNER Pipe 0042783- CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI 2054 12/07/99 $975.75 MINNESOTA WANNER Sign Stands 0042825- STREET NAME SI GENERAL SUPPLI 5025 < *> $996.52* 205673 12/07/99 $380.00 MINNESOTA WATERCOLOR SOC Advertising 110199 ART CENTER ADM ADVERT OTHER 9062 < *> $380.00* 205674 12/07/99 $368.00 MRPA Adult Basketball Regi 112999 EDINA ATHLETIC DUES & SUBSCRI < *> $368.00* 205675 12/07/99 $1,672.99 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO Repairs to GroundMast I310575 CENTENNIAL LAK CONTR REPAIRS '2053 2058 12/07/99 $204.57 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO Rapairs to Greens Mow I311123 CENTENNIAL LAK CONTR REPAIRS 12/07/99 $219.82 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO Repairs to Greens Mow I311130 CENTENNIAL LAK CONTR REPAIRS 20,53 12/07/99 $1,412.58 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO Repair Parts 1311245 MAINT.OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 6245 12/07/99 $835.89 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO Repair Parts 1311480 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 6245 12/07/99 $74.34 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO Repair Mower I311429 CENTENNIAL LAK CONTR REPAIRS 2053 < *> $4,420.19* 205676 12/07/99 $495.01 MUNICILITE CO Magnetic Mini Edge 11702 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 5170 < *> $495.01* 205677 12/07/99 $78.30 National Camera Exchange Craft Supplies 1018907E ART CENTER ADM CRAFT.SUPPLIES 9058 < *> $78.30* 205678 12/07/99 $283.60 NCSM Limited Partnership Contract Repair 102599 STREET IMPROVE CIP < *> $283.6.0* 205679 12/07/99 $28.60 NELSON, BARBARA Art Work Sold at EAC 111899 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER 12/07/99 $153.00 NELSON, BARBARA Teaching AC 112499 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES 12/07/99 $480.00 NELSON, BARBARA Media Prof. Serv.. AC 112499 MEDIA LAB PROF SERVICES• < *> $661.60* 205680 12/07/99 $27.30 NELSON, CHRISTINE. Art Work Sold at EAC 111899 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER *> $27.30* 205681 12/07/99 $35.00 Nelson, David Professional Services 112399 POLICE DEPT. G PROF SERVICES < *> $35.00* 205682 12/07/99 $816.00 NELSON, J THOMAS Teaching AC 112499 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $816.00* 205683 12/07/99 $472.00 New France Wine Co COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 1263 .50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE < *> $472.00* 205684 12/07/99 .$9.38 Nillson, Beth Skating Instructor 111999 POOL TRACK GRE PROF SERVICES < *> $9.38* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 02- DEC -1999 (13:20) -page 24 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM -----------------------------------------------------=------------------------------------------------------------ 205685 12/07/99 $100.00 NISSEN, DICK Police Service 120199 RESERVE PROGRA - ----------------- CONTR SERVICES < *> $100.00* 205686 12/07/99 $210.60 NORMAN, MIKE Art Work Sold at EAC 111899 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $210.60* .205687 12/07/99 $35.00 NORMAN, POLLY Teaching AC 112499 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $35.00* 205688 12/07/99 $225.00 North EMS Education Open House - Air Bags A -501 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRE PREVENTIO 3621. < *> $225.00* 205689 12/07/99 $20.40 NORTH STAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 54335 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 12/07/99 $51.06 NORTH STAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 54338 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX„ 12/07/99 $122.40 NORTH STAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 55727 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 12/07/99 $51.00 NORTH STAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 56068- VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 12/07/99 $40.80 NORTH STAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 56069 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 12/07/99 $91.80 NORTH STAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 56070 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX .` < *> $377.46* 205690 12/07/99 $341.14 NORTH STAR TURF Pulley, Belt 216505 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5888 < *> $341.14* 205691 12/07/99 $11,424.96 NORTHDALE CONSTRUCTION C Contract No. 98 -6(ENG 120199 SAN.SEWER CIP PAYMENT < *> $11,424.96* 205692 12/07/99 $50.03 Northern Tool & Equipmen Tools 82212608 MAINT OF COURS TOOLS 6249 < *> $50.03* 205693 12/07/99 $70.46 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY D'Arches, Gemini 16528600 ART SUPPLY.GIF COST OF GD SOL 9077 12/07/99 $157.94 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY Sculpey Inter, Basic. 16574500 ART SUPPLY GIF COST OF GD SOL 9089 .' 12/07/99 $88.58 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY Ruler, Newsprint 16609700 ART SUPPLY GIF COST OF GD -SOL 9096 < *> $316.98* 205694 12/07/99 $520.51 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO Calcium Chloride, Tir NW -59054 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES 5172 12/07/99 $473.94 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO Wheel Repair NW -59119 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES 12/07/99 $126.00 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO Repair Casing, Servic NW59415 EQUIPMENT OPER .5172 TIRES & TUBES 51 -72 < *> $1,120.45* 205695 12/07/99 $75.00 Nudell - Kalin, Jeremy AC Instruction 111599 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $75.00* 205696, 12/07/99 $168.00 Nylander, Julie Prof. Serv..- Model 112499 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $168.00* - 205697 12/07/99 $1,055.80 Oak Ridge Country Club Merchandise 111799 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6286 < *> $1,055.80* . 2056.98 12/07/99 $68.63 Olsen Chain & Cable'Co I Nylon Slings /Tools 124585 BUILDING MAINT TOOLS 5899 12/07/99 $21.09 Olsen Chain & Cable Co I Cord Set, Protector, 6088 BUILDING MAINT REPAIR PARTS 5899 12/07/99 $2.49 Olsen Chain & Cable Co I Repair Parts 6089 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 6250 12/07/99 $88.31 Olsen Chain &,Cable Co I Saw Blades 125362 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 3610 < *> $180.52* 205699 12/07/99 $124.5.0 Otis Spunkmeyer Inc Cookies 87495094 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 9037 COUNCIL CHECK h,.�ISTER. 02- DEC -1999 (13: page 25 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM-------- - OBJECT--- - - -PO- NUM - - -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- < *> $124.50* 205700 12/07/99 $111.69 OWENS SERVICE CO Fixed Air Vent, Water 36004 POOL TRACK GRE CONTR REPAIRS 2212 < *> $111.69* 205701 12/07/99 $37.00 P & R PRODUCTS CO Helmet Shield 10924 FIRE DEPT. GEN PROTECT CLOTHI 3623 < *> $37.00* 205702 12/07/99 $424.05 Paging Network of Minnes Pager Rental 064 -A343 FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP RENTAL < *> $424.05* 205703 12/07/99 $52.65 PANCAKE, CHAR Art.Work Sold AC 111899 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $52.65* 205704 12/07/99 $260.00 PARNELL, CLIFF Teaching AC 112499 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $260.00* 205705 12/07/99 $2,301.55 PARTS PLUS Repair Parts 112599 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS < *> $2,301.55* 205706 12/07/99 - $133.25 PASS, GRACE Art Work Sold at EAC 111899 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $133.25* 205707 12/07/99 $19.73 PENN RACQUET SPORTS- tax on Inv# 50417 537,12- TENNIS INSTRUC GENERAL SUPPLI 4169• < *> $19.73* 205708 12/07/99 $187.30 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY COST OF GOODS.SOLD MI 32441684 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 12/07/99 $248.70 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD_MI 32655228 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $436.00* 205709 12/07/99 $1,800.00 PERKINS LANDSCAPE CONTRA Field Repairs STMT10 /2 FIELD MAINTENA.PROF SERVICES 7035 < *> $1,800.00* 205710 12/07/99 $423.87 Petersburg, Richard R. MLS Software 111699 ASSESSING CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $423.87* 205712 12/07/99 $5.50 PETTY CASH Council Mtg. Expense 111899 CITY COUNCIL MEETING EXPENS 12/07/99 $20.00 PETTY CASH Chamber Lunch 111899 ADMINISTRATION CONF & SCHOOLS 12./07/99 $42.72 PETTY CASH Mtg. Expense Admin. 111899 ADMINISTRATION MEETING EXPENS 12/07/99 $15.81 PETTY CASH Mileage Admin. 111899 ADMINISTRATION MILEAGE 12/07/99 $21.13 PETTY CASH Postage Admin. 111899 ADMINISTRATION POSTAGE 12/07/99 $9.45 PETTY CASH Mileage Finance 111899 FINANCE MILEAGE 12/07/99 $21.11 PETTY CASH Election Supplies 111899 ELECTION GENERAL SUPPLI 12/07/99 $46.41 PETTY CASH Mtg. Expense Assess.. 111899 ASSESSING MEETING EXPENS 12/07/99 $2.00 PETTY CASH Parking Assess. 111899 ASSESSING MILEAGE 12/07/99 $21.29 PETTY CASH Supplies Eng. 111899 ENGINEERING GE GENERAL SUPPLI 12/07/99 $3.00 PETTY CASH Parking P.W. 111899 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 12/07/99 $4.83 PETTY CASH Supplies Health 111899 PUBLIC HEALTH GENERAL SUPPLI 12/07/99 $12.25 PETTY CASH Parking Bldg. 111899 INSPECTIONS. MILEAGE 12/07/99 $5.25 PETTY CASH Kitchen Supplies 111899 CITY HALL GENE PAPER SUPPLIES 12/07/99 $10.49 PETTY CASH Adaptive Rec. 111899 ADAPTIVE RECRE GENERAL SUPPLI 12/07/99 $12.00 PETTY CASH Parking P.W. 111899 GENERAL TURF C MILEAGE 12/07/99 $8.00 PETTY CASH Mtg. Expense - Liquor 111899 LIQUOR YORK GE MEETING EXPENS 12/07/99 $13.74 PETTY CASH Supplies - Liquor #2 111899 LIQUOR YORK GE GENERAL SUPPLI 12/07/99 -$5.54 PETTY CASH Over /Under 111899 GENERAL FD PRO CASH OVER AND COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 02- DEC -1999 (13:20) page 26 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ - - - - -- < *> $269.44* 205716 12/07/99 - $12.82 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 3203803 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 . -$4.12 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 3203914 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 - $24.65. PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 3204004 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 - $160.15 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 3204005 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 - $67.75 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD.WI 3204006 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 - $50.30 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 3204403. YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 - $308.60 PHILLIPS'WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 3204404 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 12/07/99 -$2.34 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 3204829 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $47.15 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS. SOLD WI 551619 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $55.70 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 551620 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 12/07/99 $534.95 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 551621 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12,/07/99 $0.33 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 551622 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 12/07/99 $2,039.35 PHILLIPS WINE &_SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 551623 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $515.00 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 551624 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $3,158.26 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 551625 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 12/07/99 $499.40 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 551626 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $9,640.83 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 551627 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 12/07/99 $2,121.50 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 551628 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $5,507.05 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 551629 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 12/07/99 $1,328.55 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 551630 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 -$2.34 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 3204830 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 -$3.53 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 3204831 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 -$2.99 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST,OF GOODS SOLD LI 3204832 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 12/07/.99 - $30.65 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 3204905 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $81.30 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 553835 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 12/07/99 $47.15 PHILLIPS WINE &.SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 553836 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 12/07/99 $1,868.65 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 553838 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $197.60 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF, GOODS SOLD LI 553839 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 12/07/99 $1,388.95 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 553840 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $41.80 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 553841 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 12/07/99 $2,893.27 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 553842 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 12/07/99 $3,109.55 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 553843 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $2,076.50 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 553844 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 12/07/99 $2,350.15 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 553845 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $274.05 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 554538 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $347.85 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 554539 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $453.70 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 554941 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF-GD WINE 12/07/99 $132.25 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 554942 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 12/.07/99 $1,432.18 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 554943 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $1,625.06 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 554944 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 12/07/99 $3,886.63 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 554945 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $615.98 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 554946 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $244.00 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 555237 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $470.09 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 555663 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 12/07/99 $5,726.10 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 555664 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $170.00 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 555860 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $863.65 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 556282 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $55,074.29* 205717 12/07/99 $149.50 Phillips, Linda Art Work Sold at EAC 111899 'ART CNTR_PROG SALES OTHER < *> $149.50* 205718 12/07/99 $124.88 Ping Merchandise 4177116 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 8025 205726 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 205727 12/07/99 205728 12/07/99 205729 12/07/99 $1,995.67 $829.77 $1,142.50 $2,977.79 $752.87 $1,716.26 $1,160.85 $928.68 $1,547.80 $172.20 $481.90 $1,113.02 $1,626.40 $51.49 $1,819.94 $18,317.14* $277.06 $277.06* $225.00 $225.00* $2,528.52 $2,528.52* PRIOR WINE COMPANY- PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRO GUARD COST OF GOODS SOLD WI COST OF GOODS SOLD WI COST OF GOODS SOLD WI COST OF GOODS SOLD WI COST OF GOODS SOLD WI COST OF GOODS SOLD WI COST OF GOODS SOLD WI COST OF GOODS SOLD WI COST OF GOODS SOLD WI COST OF GOODS SOLD WI COST OF GOODS SOLD WI COST OF GOODS SOLD WI COST OF GOODS SOLD WI COST. OF GOODS SOLD WI COST OF GOODS SOLD WI General Supply Professional Driver Trai Driver Training 132926 132930 132936 136193 136197 136204 137111 137113 137115 138153 138155 139009 139011 139013 140003 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD.WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF.GD,WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD.WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE. YORK - SELLING CST OF GD WINE. VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 158467 ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPLI 8076 110199 ADMINISTRATION DUES & SUBSCRI PROGRESSIVE CONSULTING E Water Treatment Plant 99022.06 GENERAL(BILLIN PROF SERVICES 02- DEC -1999 (13:. page 27 COUNCIL CHECK knGISTER CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT --------------------------------- VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM -------------------------------------- < *> $124.88* 205719 12/07/99 $600.98 Pinkerton,Systems Integr Replace Track Camera 0014870- POOL TRACK GRE CONTR REPAIRS CONTRACT < *> $600.98* 205720 12/07/99 $266.59 Pinnacle Distributing COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 590334 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 12/07/99 $1,039.64 Pinnacle Distributing COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 590394 YORK.SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 12/07/99 $596.23 Pinnacle Distributing COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 590445 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 12/07/99 $426.53 Pinnacle Distributing COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 590475 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 12/07/99 $19.00 Pinnacle Distributing GENERAL SUPPLIES 590476 LIQUOR 50TH ST GENERAL SUPPLI 12/07/99 $1,039.66. Pinnacle Distributing COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 590613 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX, 12/07/99 $586.47 Pinnacle Distributing COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 590652 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 12/07/99 $346.55 Pinnacle Distributing COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 590665 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $906.34 Pinnacle Distributing COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 590783 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 12/07/99 $399.87 Pinnacle Distributing COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 590810 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 12/07/99 $719.75 Pinnacle Distributing COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 590864 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX < *> $6,346.63* 205721 12/07/99 $115.00 Police Officers Federati Ad CA4067 GOLF DOME ADVERT OTHER 6289 < *> $115.00* 205722 12/07/99 $98.00 Popp Telcom Stat. 2 Phone Line Re 36833 _FIRE DEPT. GEN CONTR REPAIRS < *> $98.00* 205723 12/07/99 $100.00 POSTMASTER Bulk Permit 00303 113099 CENT SVC GENER POSTAGE < *> $100.00* 205724 12/07/99 $159.00 PRECISION BUSINESS SYSTE Maintenance Agreement 066271 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI 4524 < *> $159.00* 205726 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 12/07/99 205727 12/07/99 205728 12/07/99 205729 12/07/99 $1,995.67 $829.77 $1,142.50 $2,977.79 $752.87 $1,716.26 $1,160.85 $928.68 $1,547.80 $172.20 $481.90 $1,113.02 $1,626.40 $51.49 $1,819.94 $18,317.14* $277.06 $277.06* $225.00 $225.00* $2,528.52 $2,528.52* PRIOR WINE COMPANY- PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRIOR WINE COMPANY PRO GUARD COST OF GOODS SOLD WI COST OF GOODS SOLD WI COST OF GOODS SOLD WI COST OF GOODS SOLD WI COST OF GOODS SOLD WI COST OF GOODS SOLD WI COST OF GOODS SOLD WI COST OF GOODS SOLD WI COST OF GOODS SOLD WI COST OF GOODS SOLD WI COST OF GOODS SOLD WI COST OF GOODS SOLD WI COST OF GOODS SOLD WI COST. OF GOODS SOLD WI COST OF GOODS SOLD WI General Supply Professional Driver Trai Driver Training 132926 132930 132936 136193 136197 136204 137111 137113 137115 138153 138155 139009 139011 139013 140003 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD.WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF.GD,WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD.WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE. YORK - SELLING CST OF GD WINE. VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 158467 ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPLI 8076 110199 ADMINISTRATION DUES & SUBSCRI PROGRESSIVE CONSULTING E Water Treatment Plant 99022.06 GENERAL(BILLIN PROF SERVICES COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 02- DEC -1999 (13:20) page 28 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR - DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM -- - - - - - - 205730 - - - - - - - - - - 12/07/99 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - $20.02 - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - Protection One - - - - -- Contract Fire Alarm S 299842 BUILDING MAINT PROF SERVICES 5098 < *> $20.02* 205731 12/07/99 $609.00 R.I. Music Performance T Union Fees for Music 040799 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER 2066 < *> $609.00* 205732 12/07/99 $51.07 RADIO SHACK ACCT REC Phone Supplies 039522 CLUB HOUSE TELEPHONE 6285 < *> $51.07* 205733 12/07/99 $451.35, RED WING SHOES Work Shoes /Boots 1186 ENGINEERING GE GENERAL SUPPLI 12/07/99 $494.70 RED WING SHOES Work Shoes /Boots 1186 GENERAL'MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 12/07/99 $148.90 RED WING SHOES Work Shoes /Boots 1186 EQUIPMENT.OPER SAFETY EQUIPME 12/07/99 $577.10 RED WING SHOES Work Shoes /Boots 1186 BUILDING MAINT SAFETY EQUIPME < *> $1,672.05* 205734 12/07/99 $100.00 MINNEGASCO Seminar Fees 01099VS FIRE DEPT—GEN CONF &SCHOOLS 12/07/99 $1,267.95 MINNEGASCO HEAT 111799 POOL TRACK GRE HEAT - < *> $1,367.95* 205735 12/07/99 $1,281.15 Rich Gardner Companies Front Steps /Sidewalk 112499 CDBG PROG PROF SERVICES. < *> $1,281.15* 205736 12/07/99 $160.00 RICKERT, DAVID Prof. Serv. AC 112499 ART CENTER.ADM PROF SERVICES 12/07/99 $40.00 RICKERT, DAVID Prof. Serv. Media AC 112499 MEDIA LAB PROF SERVICES < *> $200.00* 205737 12/07/99 $166.04 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED Ultra Hitch Receiver 1130999- EQUIPMENT'OPER REPAIR PARTS 5174 < *> $166.04* 205738 12/07/99 $865.68 RISC Instructor- S.O.T. 1919 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $865.68* 205739 12/07/99 $30.10 Ritz Camera Photo Finishing 03750466 FIRE DEPT. GEN PHOTO SUPPLIES 9762 12/07/99 $42.02 Ritz Camera Film & Photo Finishin 03750595 FIRE DEPT. GEN PHOTO SUPPLIES 9762 12/07/99 $9.14 Ritz Camera Film 37506090 FIRE DEPT. GEN PHOTO SUPPLIES 9762 12/07/99 $33..19 Ritz Camera Photo Finishing 03750621 FIRE DEPT. GEN PHOTO SUPPLIES 9762 12/07/99 $24.39 Ritz Camera Photo Finishing 37508448 FIRE DEPT. GEN PHOTO SUPPLIES 9762 < *> $138.84* 205740 12/07/99 $172.00 RoweKamp Associates INc Software Upgrade 990365 ENGINEERING GE EQUIP REPLACEM 4529 < *> $172.00* 205741 12/07/99 $84.43 SA -AG INC Fill Sand For Lewis 4937 FIELD MAINTENA•SAND,GRVL & RO 5903 < *> $84.43* 205742 12/07/99 $39.00 Scheel, -Wade Art Work Sold at EAC 111899 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $39.00* 205743 12/07/99 $278.00 Science Museum of Minnes Computer Class C43156 GOLF ADMINISTR CONF & SCHOOLS 6287 < *> $278.00* 205744 12/07/99 $24.84 SEARS Wet /Dry Vac Filters 6226452 ENGINEERING GE GENERAL SUPPLI 5011 ;< *> $24.84* 205.745 12/07/99 $10.41 SEELYE PLASTICS PVC Pipe 545090 LIFT STATION M:GENERAL SUPPLI 5194 02- DEC -1999 (13:_ page 29 COUNCIL CHECK RtGISTER CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM - - -- OBJECT-- - - - -PO NUM --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- < *> $10.41* 205746 12/07/99 $96,784.33 SEH Prof. Eng. Services 0056076 TH100 & W 77TH CIP WRITTEN <*> $96,784.33* 205747 12/07/99 $57.20 Seifert, Elizabeth Art Work Sold at EAC 111899 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $57.20* 205748 12/07/99 $75.00 Severson, Jo AC Instruction 111599 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES 12/07/99 $75.00 Severson, Jo Teaching AC 112499 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $150.00* 205749 12/07/99 $32.50 SHAUGHNESY, SANDRA D Art Work Sold at EAC 111899 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER 12/07/99 $533.00 SHAUGHNESY, SANDRA D Teaching AC 112499 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $565.50* 205750 12/07/99 $100.00 SHEPARD, JOHN Police Service 120199 RESERVE PROGRA CONTR SERVICES < *> $100.00* 205751 12/07/99 $90.00 Silvers, Roxanne Prof. Serv. -Model AC 112499 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $90.00* 205752 12/07/99 $152.58 SIMS SECURITY Security for Event 00011225 POOL TRACK GRE PROF SERVICES CONTRACT 12/07/99 $76.29 SIMS SECURITY Security for Event 00046628 POOL TRACK GRE PROF SERVICES CONTRACT 12/07/99 $71.30 SIMS SECURITY Security 00070710 POOL TRACK GRE PROF SERVICES CONTRACT < *> $300..17* 205753 12/07/99 $568.71 SMITH & HAWKEN Replacement Chairs 00050346 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI 2007 < *> $568.71* 205754 12/07/99 $39.65 Smith, Connie Art Work Sold at EAC 111899 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $39.65* 205755 12/07/99 $162.99 Smith, Pam Art Work Sold at EAC .111899 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $162.99* 205756 12/07/99 $36.74 SNAP -ON TOOLS Pipe Wrench Set, Hot 21V/1141 EQUIPMENT OPER.TOOLS 5037 < *> $36.74* 205757 12/07/99 $35.00 Social Security Administ Professional Services 112599 POLICE DEPT. G PROF SERVICES < *> $35.00* 205758 12/07/99 $35:00 Social Security Administ Professional Services 11/25 POLICE DEPT. G PROF SERVICES . < *> $35.00* 205759 12/07/99 $38.35 Solberg, Bliss Art Work Sold at EAC 111899 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER . < *> $38.35* 12/07/99 $689.35 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 97929 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE .205761 12/07/99 $60.60 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 101109 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 12/07/99 $1,618.30 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 101110 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 12/07/99 $12.20 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 101111 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 12/07/99 $2,322.10 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 101114 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/07/99 $24.40 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 101115 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/07/99 - $30.23 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I Beer 314146 FRED RICHARDS CST OF GDS BEE 9041 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 02- DEC -1999 (13:20) page 30 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------=--------------------------------------------- 205761 12/07/99 $981.90 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 101327 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS .BEE 12/07/99 $52.80 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 101328 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 12/07/99 $3,272.10 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 101331 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/07/99 $611.10 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 101426 YORK ,SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/07/99 $651.25 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 101555 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 12/07/99 $22.35 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 101556 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 12/07/99 $4,797.35 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF. GOODS SOLD BE 101559 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/07/99 $166.15 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 101560 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS -BEE 12/07/99 $341.25 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 101632 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE < *> $15,592.97* 205762 12/07/99 $7,774.50 SPECIFIED MECHANICAL SYS VFD Drive 9699 PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPLI 5969 < *> $7,774.50* 205763 12/07/99 $104.12 Speedway SuperAmerica LL, LP Gas 102999 EQUIPMENT OPER GASOLINE 5147 < *> $104.12* 205764 12/07/99 $1,007.44 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC Noise Study 3254 -12 CONTINGENCIES .PROF SERVICES 12/07/99 - $40.00 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC Traffic Signal Design 3258 -7A TRAFFIC SIGNAL CIP 12/07/99 $800.82._ SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC Traffic Signal Design 3268 -7 PARKLAWN & 77T CIP 12/07/99 $416.20 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC Traffic Calming Study 3564 -2 CONTINGENCIES PROF SERVICES < *> $2,184.46* 205765 12/07/99 $10.15 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO Antenna SI83503 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR -PARTS 5290 < *> $10.15* 205766 12/07/99 $900.00 Stallion Electric Electrical Supplies 3050 ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPLI 8080 < *> $900.00* 205767 12/07/99 $9,000.00 Stantec Consulting Ins. Prof. Services 011236 ENGINEERING.GE PROF SERVICES 4541 < *> $9,000.00* 205768 12/07/99 $107.12 STEWART LUMBER Dricon /Lumber 861736 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 5219 < *> $107.12* 205769 12/07/99 $35.00 Stouten, Jackie Art Program on, 12;/21/ 111899 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO.SVC OTHER < *> $35.00* 20577.0 12/07/99 $21.30 STRAND MANUFACTURING CO Modify Hook 23100 LIFT STATION M GENERAL SUPPLI 5935 < *> $21.30* 205771 12/07/99 $999.14 STREICHERS Equip Replace- Squads 136921.1 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP REPLACEM 2640 12/07/99 $1,057.66 STREICHERS Equip Replace- Squad 138147.1 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP REPLACEM 2640 . 12/07/99 $44.41 STREICHERS Ammo /Cleaning 138196.1 POLICE DEPT. G AMMUNITION 3066 12/07/99 $180.00 STREICHERS Equip Replace- Laptop 138941.1 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP'REPLACEM 3067 . 12/07/99 $180.00 STREICHERS Equip Replace- Laptop 138942.1 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP REPLACEM 3065 < *> $2,461.21* 205772 12/07/99 $100.00 Strohmyer, Tom Music Program on 12/1 111899 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $100.00* 205773 12/07/99 $27.75 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET Bracket 88054CVW EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5050 12/07/99 $81.24 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET Tensioner, Strut, Sea 90674CVW EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5182 12/07/99 - $28.20 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET Credit CM88054C EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 12/07/99 $19.13 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET Mirror Glass 91702CVW EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5274 COUNCIL CHECK _- _vISTER 02- DEC -1999 (13. page 31 CHECK NO ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 205773 12/07/99 $51.70 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET Tensioner, Belt 91998CVW EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5294 < *> $151.62* 205774 12/07/99 $130.00 SUNDIN, JEROME Prof. Serv. AC 112499 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $130.00* 205775 12/07/99 $52.94 SUNDIN, ROSALIE Art Work Sold at EAC 111899 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER 12/07/99 $420.00 SUNDIN, ROSALIE Prof. Serv. AC 112499 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES 12/07/99 $316.00 SUNDIN, ROSALIE Media Prof. Serv. AC 112499 MEDIA LAB PROF SERVICES < *> $788.94* 205776 12/07/99 $405.75 Superior Coffee and Food Coffee 8143518 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 9042 < *> $405.75* 205777 12/07/99 $100.00 SWANSON, HAROLD Police Service 120199 RESERVE PROGRA CONTR SERVICES < *> $100.00* 2057.78 12/07/99 $576.00 SWANSON, LUCILLE, Ambulance Overpayment 070999 R GENERAL FD PRO.AMBULANCE FEES < * >... $576.00* 205779 12/07/99 $66.03 Tape Company, The Gen. Sup. - Tapes 29370740 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI 3055 < *> $66.03* 205780 12/07/99 $95.83 TARGET General Supplies 78629 ART SUPPLY GIF GENERAL SUPPLI 9081 < *> $95.83* 205781 12/07/99 $55.25 Teller,.Dee Art Work Sold at EAC 111899 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $55.25* 205782 12/07/99 $39.19 -TERMINAL, SUPPLY CO Relays 85633 -00 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5060 12/07/99 $25.48 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO Fuses - Stock 86841 -00 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 5302 12/07/99 $465.4'0 TERMINAL SUPPLY-CO Cables, Wire, Batt. T 87773 -00 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5213 < *> $530.07* 205783 12/07/99 $45.80 TERRY ANN SALES CO Roll Towel Dispensers 2312 RANGE GENERAL SUPPLI 6117 < *> $45.80* 205784 .12/07/99 $50.00, THOLEN, BRIAN Continuing Education 112399 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $50.00* 205785 12/07/99 $78.00 THOMPSON, PAUL Art Work Sold at EAC 111899 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $78.00* 205786 12/07/99 $180.00 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP Beer 177417 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 9043 12/07/99 $1,267.65 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP COST OF -GOODS SOLD BE 177517 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 12/07/99 $12.10 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 177518 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 12/07/99 - $121.50 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP Beer 140773 GRILL CST OF GDS BEE 9043 12/07/99 $160.00 THORPE.DISTRIBUTING COMP Beer 178019 GRILL CST OF GDS BEE 9043 12/07/99 $2,520.00 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 178069 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE - 12/07/99 $209.30 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 178070 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 12/07/99 $36.30 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 178493 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 12/07/99 .$3,646.75 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 178494 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE < *> $7,910.60* 205787 12/07/99 $11,684.78 TKDA Engineers Architect Final Design -San. Sew 045059 SANITARY SEWER CIP WATER AG COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 02- DEC -1999 (13:20) page 32 HECK NO DATE ` CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM -------- < * > - - - - -- $11,684.78* 205788 12/07/99 $138. -89 TOLL GAS Si WELDING SUPPL Oxygen, Argon, Acetyl 413925 PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPLI 5148 12/07/99 $11.78 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPL Welding Supplies 413926 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI CONTRACT 12/07/99- .$87.57 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPL Acetylene, Argon, Oxy 281691 EQUIPMENT OPER WELDING SUPPLI 5163 12/07/99 $28.64 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPL Tools - Welding 285038 MAINT OF COURS TOOLS 6253 < *> $266.88* 205789 12/07/99 $43.42 Tomlinson, Dawn Art Work Sold at EAC 111899 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $43.42* 205790 12/07/99. $166.40 Treuting, Kristen Art Work Sold at EAC 111899 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $166.40* 205791 12/07/99 .$44.00 TRIANGLE PRINTING COMPAN Craft Supplies 1124929 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES 9093 < * >. $44.00* :205792: 12/07./99 $93.,55 TROPHY WORLD Plaques /Engraving 17001 GOLF ADMINISTR GENERAL SUPPLI 6119 < *> $93.55* 205793 12/07/99 $176.00 Turk, Mickie Teaching AC 112499 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $176.00* 205794. 12/07/99 $220.73 TWIN -CITY .GARAGE DOOR CO Drive Shaft, Sprocket 087738 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 5272 12/07/99 $385.,00 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO Preventative Maintena 087740 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 5272 12/07/99 $510.73 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO Garage Door Parts 088707 PW BUILDING' REPAIR PARTS 5929 < *> $1;11'6.46* 205795 12/07/99 $27.52 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO Oxygen -Stat. 2 511706 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 9765 12/07/99 $59.75. TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO Oxygen 513569 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 9765. 12/07/99 $49.25- TWIN_ CITY OXYGEN CO Oxygen 514466 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 9765 12/07/99 $547.58 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO Oxygen 514927 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 9765 < *> $684.10* 205796 12/07/99- $221.52 TWIN CITY SEED CO. Fertilizer 2286 GENERAL TURF C FERTILIZER 5105 < *> $221.52* 205797_ 12/07/99 $30.60 U S BANCORP Painting Supplies (Ho 111799 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $30.60 *. 205798 12/07/9,9 $119.08 U S BANCORP Tools (Home Depot) 11/22 FIRE DEPT. GEN TOOLS < *> $119.08* 205799 12/07/99 -. $195.46- U.S. Filter /Waterpro General Supply 0224009 ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPLI 8077 < *> $195.46* 205800 12/07/99 $1,577.77 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED General Uniform Accou OCT99 POLICE DEPT. G UNIF ALLOW 12/07/99 $18.98 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED General Supplies Acco-OCT99 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI 12/07/99 $774:75 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED Reserves /Explorers OCT99 RESERVE PROGRA UNIF ALLOW <` *> $2,371.50 *.. 205801' 12/07/99 $381.31 UNIMED MIDWEST INC. Ambulance Supplies 0010345 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 3601 < *> $381.31* 205802 12/07/99 $231.91 United Electric ITEX 49443100 ST LIGHTING OR REPAIR PARTS 5129 02- DEC -1999 (13: page 33 COUNCIL CHECK hL�ISTER CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT, VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM, --------- OBJECT -- - - -PO -NUM -------------------------------------------------------------------- < * >. $231.91* 205803 12/07/99 $291.20 UNITED HORTICULTURAL SUP Maxi Snow Melt 0360223 STREET REVOLVI GENERAL SUPPLI 5187 < *> $291.20* 205804. 12/07/99 $85.00 University of Minnesota Pavement Maint. Class 749677 TRAINING CONF & SCHOOLS CONF & SCHOOLS 5993 5993 12/07/99 $85.00 University of Minnesota Pavement Maint. Class Maint. Class 749678 749679, TRAINING TRAINING CONF & SCHOOLS 5993 12/07/99 $85.00 University of Minnesota Pavement < *> $255.00* 205805 12'/07/99 $519.00 UNIVERSITY OF ST THOMAS Fees 204219 ENGINEERING GE CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $519.00* 205806 12/07/99 $165:60 UNUM. LIFE INSURANCE CO 11 -1, 12 -1 AD & D 112999 CENT SVC GENER HOSPITALIZATIO < *> $165.60* 205807 12/07./99 $384.40 UnumProvident 11 -1 -99 Basic Life -1 Life 112999 112999 CENT SVC GENER CENT SVC GENER HOSPITALIZATIO HOSPITALIZATIO .12/07/99 $384.40 $42.40 UnumProvident UnumProvident 12 -99 Basic 11 -1 -99 G. Hughes 112999 CENT SVC GENER HOSPITALIZATIO 12/07/99 12/07/99- $42.40 UnumProvident 12 -1 -99 G. Hughes 112999 CENT SVC GENER HOSPITALIZATIO < *> $853.60* 205808 12/07/99 $58.12 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 112299 PUMP-& LIFT ST TELEPHONE < *> $58:12* 205809 12/07/99 $884.40 US West Dex Y.P. Listing On the Go Listing 00596909 00596909 CLUB HOUSE CLUB HOUSE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 12/07/99 $78.60 US West Dex < *> $963•.00* 205810 12/07/99 $111.00 US West Dex Y.P. Listing 00596909 FRED RICHARDS TELEPHONE < *> $111.00* 205811 12/07/99 $714.58 US West Dex Advertising, Yellow P 00595170 ED ADMINISTRAT ADVERT OTHER < *> $714.58* 205812 12%07/99 $84.30 US West Dex Y.P.'Listing 00596910 GOLF DOME ADVERT OTHER < *> $84.30* 205813 12/07/99 $25.50 US West Dex W.P. Listing 00596903 FRED RICHARDS TELEPHONE < *> $25.50* 205814 12/07/99 $405.23 VAN PAPER CO. Cleaning Supplies 290830 291602 CENTENNIAL LAK YORK SELLING CLEANING SUPPL PAPER SUPPLIES 2073 9806 12/07/99 $281.16 VAN PAPER CO. VAN CO. Paper Bags Bags 291605 50TH ST SELLIN PAPER SUPPLIES 9805 12/07/99 12/07/99 $662.,64 PAPER VAN.PAPER CO. T.T., Towels, Cups & 291606 CITY HALL GENE PAPER SUPPLIES 4521 12/07/99 .$730.00 $477.33 VAN PAPER CO. Bags- 291607- VERNON SELLING PAPER SUPPLIES 9807 12/07/99 $111.29 VAN PAPER CO. Roll Towels 291866 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI 2062 12/07/99 $183.71 VAN PAPER CO. Linens 292386• CENTENNIAL LAK CLEANING SUPPL 2067 '12/07/99 - $67.10 VAN PAPER CO. Credit 292616 CENTENNIAL LAK CLEANING SUPPL 2073 12/07/99 $137.12 VAN PAPER CO. Hangers 292846 CLUB HOUSE GENERAL SUPPLI 9045 12/07/99 $348.79 VAN PAPER CO. Garbage Bags 293420 LITTER REMOVAL GENERAL SUPPLI 5101 < *> $3,270.17* 205815 12/07/99 $251.00 VINTAGE ONE WINES COST OF GOODS SOLD.WI 3603 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $502.00 VINTAGE ONE WINES COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 3604 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER RECYCLING DUES & SUBSCRI Meeting Expense 112599 02- DEC -1999 (13:20) page 34 HECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT White, Jean VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM --------------------------------------------------7--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 205815 12/07/99 $379.00 VINTAGE ONE WINES. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 3608 50TH ST SELLIN, CST OF GD WINE WINE < *> $1,132.00* OF GOODS SOLD WI 029993 12/07/99 $1,678.28 205816 12/07/99 $933.47 Wagner Greenhouse Inc Tree Top Bundles 75R99' STREET REVOLVI GENERAL SUPPLI 5138 < *> 'WINE $933.47* THE COST OF.GOODS SOLD WI 029995 2058.17 12/07/99 $895.12 WALSER FORD .Transmission Work FOCS8737 EQUIPMENT OPER CONTR REPAIRS 1473 030015 12/07/99 $16.70 WALSER FORD Tube 77249FOW EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5732 WI.030141 12/07/99 $907.74 WALSER FORD Control Assembly, Cor FOCS9658 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5736 SOLD 12/07/99 $334.14 WALSER FORD Shoes & Brake Linings 78622FOW EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5208 < *> SOLD $2,153.70* 030437 12/07/99 $675.60 WINE COMPANY, THE COST 205818 12/07/99 $100.00 WALSH, WILLIAM Police Service 120199 RESERVE PROGRA CONTR SERVICES THE < *> OF $100.00* SOLD WI 030453 12/07/99 $448.95 WINE COMPANY, 205819 12/07/99 205820 12/07/99 205821 12/07/99 205822 12/07/99 205823 12/07/99 205824 12/07/99 12/07/99 205825 12/07/99 205826 12/07/99 $28.00 Waste News $28.00* $43.00 WATERSTREET, JOAN M $43.00 *, $313.89 WearGuard $313.89* $612.00 WENZEL, KENNETH $612.00* $79:00 $79.00* $55.99 $136.72 $192.71* $35:71 $35.71* $11,605.00 $11,605.00* West Group Renew Subscription 111799 RECYCLING DUES & SUBSCRI Meeting Expense 112599 POLICE DEPT. G MEETING EXPENS Uniform Pants & Bibs" 41369257 CENTENNIAL LAK LAUNDRY 2057 Prof. Serv. AC 112499 ART CENTER ADM PROF.SERVICES Environ- Liability Upd 529 -464- ENGINEERING GE DUES & SUBSCRI 4526 WEST WELD SUPPLY CO. Flap Wheels, 27448 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES WEST WELD SUPPLY CO. Gouging Nozzle, Drill 27594 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES White, Jean Mileage Reimbursement 112299 GOLF ADMINISTR MILEAGE Willard Eggan & Sons, In Housing Rehabilitatio 111599 CDBG PROG PROF SERVICES 205828 12/07/99 $1,624.65 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 027152 12/07/99 7$105.50 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 029815 12/07/99 $918.32 WINE COMPANY,.THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 029993 12/07/99 $1,678.28 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 029994 12/07/99 $2,105.17 'WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF.GOODS SOLD WI 029995 12/07/99 $35.00 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD'WI 030015 " 12/07/99 - $184.00 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI.030141 12/07/99 $184.00 WINE COMPANY; THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 030142 12/07/99 $1,157.31 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 030437 12/07/99 $675.60 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 0304.38 12/07/99 $1,653.32 WINE COMPANY., THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 030453 12/07/99 $448.95 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 030461 12/07/99 $1;159.65.. WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 030529 12/07/99 $84.00' WINE.COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 030643 12/07/99 $1,545.43 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 030938 YORK SELLING. CST OF GD WINE. YORK SELLING ' CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 5212 5258 COUNCIL CHECK jISTER 02- DEC -1999 (13. page 35 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 205828 12/07/99 $493.87 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 030923 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $1,583.33 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 030926 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 - $108.58 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI.031099 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 - $70.44 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 031117 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $14,878.36* 205829 12/07/99 $19.95 WINE ENTHUSIAST Wine Enthusiast Magaz 111099 LIQUOR YORK GE DUES & SUBSCRI 4370 < *> $19.95* 205830 12/07/99 $402.95. WINE'MERCHANTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 23218 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $1,112.35 WINE MERCHANTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 23439 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $79.15 WINE MERCHANTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 23440 YORK SELLING CST OF GD -WINE 12/07/99 $395.75 WINE MERCHANTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 23441' VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $88.65 . WINE MERCHANTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI -23520 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $821.54 WINE MERCHANTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 23521 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $285.95 WINE MERCHANTS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 23577 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE < *> $3,186.34 *. 205831 12/07/99 $92.60 WINSTAR BROADBAND SERVIC Grant - CDPD 44513 COPS MORE GRAN EQUIP REPLACEM < *> $92.60* 205832 12/07/99 $72.00 Wittstruck, Martha Teaching AC 112499 ART CENTER-ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $72.00* 205833 12/07/99 $59.02 WM H MCCOY Kerosene 41663 MAINT OF- -COURS GASOLINE 6251 < *> - $59.02* 205834 12/07/99 $144.00 Wolfe, Kay Prof. Serv. AC 112499 ART CENTER,ADM PROF SERVICES < * >' $144.00* 205835 12/07/99 $178.00 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 87102 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $511.00 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 87232 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 .$1,.260.00 WORLD. CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 87233 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $239.90 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 87309 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $1,002.00 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 87453 - 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $869.98 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 87487 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $1,227.00 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF -GOODS SOLD WI 87493 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $716.00 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 87656 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $334.00 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD,WI 87660 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 12/07/99 $317.00 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 87666 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $6,654.88* 205836 12/07/99 $175.00 WORLD WATERPARK ASSOCIAT Dues & Subscriptions 111599 POOL ADMIN DUES & SUBSCRI. < *> $175.00* 205837 12/07/99 $100.00 WROBLESKI, HENRY Police Service 120199 RESERVE PROGRA CONTR SERVICES < *> $100.00* 205838 12/07/99 $745.00 Xerox Corporation Monthly Xerox Fees 07174786 CENT SVC GENER EQUIP RENTAL. 3413 12/07/99 $367.43 Xerox Corporation General Supplies - To - 170.67590 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI 3064 < *> $1,112.43 *._ 205.839 12/07/99 $100.00 Yarger,. Jack Payment of Golf Club. 110999 GOLF PROG -- PRO SHOP SALES < *> $100.00* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 02- DEC -1999 (13:20) page 36 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 205840 12/07/99 $132.49 Zack's`Inc. Supplies 19425 MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPLI. 6243 < *> $132.49* 205841 12/07/99 $111.18 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE First Aid Supplies -54064649 MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPLI 6255 12/07/99 $129.29 ZEE MEDICAL 'SERVICE Supplies 54162770 CITY HALL GENE GENERAL SUPPLI 4539 <, *> $240.47* 205842 12/07/99 $62.61 ZIEGLER INC Element PC000264 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 5166 12/07/99 $3,077.58 ZIEGLER INC Generator - Rented 2418210 DISTRIBUTION EQUIP RENTAL 5978 12/07/99 $258.06 ZIEGLER INC Valve PC000268 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 5185 < *> $3,398.-25*' 205843 12/07/99 $33.00 Zimmerman, Tim Bales of Straw for Gr 112499 GENERAL TURF C GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $33.00* ' 205844 12/07/99 $359.00 ZINN, BOBO Teaching AC 112499 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES 12/07/99 $132.31. ZINN, BOBO Craft Supplies 112499• ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES < *> $491.31* $965,965.77* COUNCIL CHECK -iISTER 02- DEC -1999 (15 ) page 1 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 13504 12/07/99 $2,951.80 BRW INC. Traffic Study 267 -0802 GRANDVIEW PRO FEE ARCH /E < *> $2,951.80* 13505 12/07/99 $564.69 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP Legal Fees 733959 CENTENNIAL LAK PRO FEES LEG /S 12/07/99 $4,320.00 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP Legal Fees 733959 GRANDVIEW PRO FEES LEG /S < *> $4,884.69* 13506 12/07/99 $6,120.00 Ehlers & Associates Inc TIF Consulting 16695 GRANDVIEW PROFESSIONAL S < *> $6,120.00* 13507 12/07/99 $35.00 Jack & Jill Park Permit Refund 111099 50TH STREET PARKING PERMIT < *> $35.00* 13508 12/07/99 $1,100.99 Walker Parking Consultan S. Ramp Trash Area De 210850 50TH STREET PRO FEE ARCH /E 12/07/99 $16,484.40 Walker Parking Consultan 49 -1/2 St. Pkg. Ramp 210862 50TH STREET PRO FEE ARCH /E < *> $17,585.39* $31,576.88* COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY 02- DEC -1999 (14:16) page 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ FUND # 01 HOUSING & REDEVELOP AUTHOR $31,576.88 $31,576.88* C 0 r COUNCIL CHECK .:.LISTER 02- DEC -1999 (I ..,4). Pagel. CliECK NO CHECK DT CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 205000 11/02/99 $3,706.83 MEDICA premiums for 11/99 102799 CENT SVC GENER HOSPITALIZATIO < *> $3,706.83* 205001 11/02/99 $60.00 MIDWEST PUBLIC GOLF`MAN meeting fees 102799 GOLF ADMINISTR CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $60.00* 205002 11/02/99 $994.99 Napa Auto Parts REPAIR, PARTS 93099 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 11/02/99 $54.83 Napa Auto Parts Creeper, 93099 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $1,049.82* 205003 11/02/99 $59,904.16 PERA Contributions to PERA 110199 GENERAL FD PRO P.E.R.A. PAYAB < *> $59,904.16* 2050;04 11/02/99 $19.62 PERA Contributions to PERA 110199A GENERAL FD PRO P.E.R.A. PAYAB < *> $19.62* .205006 11/02/99 - $30.82 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD.WI 755483 -0 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/02/99 $108.16 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI'767419 -0 50TH.ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 11/02/99 -$2.16 'QUALITY WINE. TRADE DISCOUNTS 767419 -0, 50TH-ST SELLIN TRADE DISCOUNT 11/02/99 - $119.10 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 759651 -0 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/02/99 - $60.01 QUALITY WINE COST OF .GOODS SOLD WI .765241 -0- VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/02/99 - $19.37 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS.SOLD WI 765260 -0 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/02/99 - $21.60 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 765268 -0 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 11/02/99 - $21.60 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 765269 -0 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/02/99 - $101.99 QUALITY`WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 766949 -0 VERNON SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT 11/02/99 $1,034.14 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 766661 -0 50TH ST SELLIN CST- OF GD WINE 11/02/99 • -- $10.22 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 766661- 0-50TH ST-SELLIN TRADE DISCOUNT ' 11/02/99 $2,932.92, QUALITY WINE COST'OF GOODS SOLD WI 766662 -0 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/02/99 - $29.00 .. QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 766662 -0 YORK SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT 11/02/99 $2,693.84_ QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 766663 -0 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE. 11/02/99 - $26.68- QUALITY.WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 766663 -0 VERNON SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT 11/02/99 $5,128.63 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 766949 -0 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 11/02/99 $1,874.70 QUALITY.WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 766950 -0 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD -LIQU 11/02/99 - $37.,24 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 766950 -0 50TH ST SELLIN TRADE DISCOUNT 11/02/99 $5,431.83 QUALITY WINE COST:OF GOODS SOLD LI 766952 -0 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 11/02/99 - $108.10. QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 766952 -0 YORK SELLING. TRADE DISCOUNT 11/02/99 $1,077.75 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 767724 -0 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/02/99 - $10.65 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 767724 -0 YORK SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT < *> $19,6.83.43* 205007 11/02/99 $109.28 U.S. WEST COMMUNICATION TELEPHONE 93557020 BUILDING MAINT TELEPHONE 11/02/99 $66.66. U.S. WEST COMMUNICATION TELEPHONE 93899240 CLUB HOUSE TELEPHONE 11/02/99 $55.17_ U.S..WEST COMMUNICATION TELEPHONE 92298890 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE < *> $231.11* 205008 11/02/99 $397.53 US WEST.COMMUNICATIONS LOGIS Connect.Oct 99284A CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE < *> $397.53.* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER CHECK NO CHECK DT CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR 02- DEC -1999 (14:43) page2 DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 205011 11/09/99 - $156.50 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 766544 -0 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/09/99 - $173.75 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 766578 -0 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/09/99 - $19.95 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 768006 -0 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 11/09/99 $250.58 QUALITY WINE' COST. OF GOODS SOLD LI 768446 -0 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 11/09/99 -$5.01 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 768446 -0 50TH ST SELLIN TRADE DISCOUNT 11/09/99 $1,964.47 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 768447 -0 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 11/09/99 - $39..29 QUALITY,WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 768447 -0 YORK SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT 11/09/99 $2,061.48 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 768448 -0 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 11/09/99 - $41.23 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 768448 -0 VERNON SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT 11/09/99 $401.20 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 768659 -0 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 11/09/99 -$8.02 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 768659 -0 YORK SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT 11/09/99 $905.50, QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 769256 -0 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/09/99 -$9.00 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 769256 -0 VERNON SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT 11/09/99 $3,027.17 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 769600 -0 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 11/09/99. - $30.10 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 769600 -0 50TH ST SELLIN TRADE DISCOUNT .11/09/99 $3,605.60 QUALITY WINE COST,OF GOODS SOLD WI 769601 -0 YORK SELLING . CST OF GD WINE 11/09/99. - $35.74 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 769601 -0 YORK SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT 11/09/99 $3,368.25 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 769602 -0 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/09/99 - $33.40 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 769602 -0 VERNON SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT 11/09/99 $37.11 QUALITY -WINE, COST ,OF GOODS SOLD MI 769776 -0 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 11/09/99 -$0.36 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS' 7697.76 -0 50TH ST SELLIN TRADE DISCOUNT 11/09/99 $10,555.64 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 769803 -0 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 11/09/99 - $195.24 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 769803 -0 YORK SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT 11/09/99 $1,646:77 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI.769804 -0 50TH ST.SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 11/09/99 - $32.74 QUALITY.WINE TRADE. DISCOUNTS 769804 -0 50TH ST SELLIN TRADE DISCOUNT 11/09/99 $3,097.17 QUALITY. WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 769805. -0 VERNON.SELLING CST,OF GD LIQU 11/09/99 - $61.57 QUALITY WINE COST, OF GOODS SOLD LI 769805 -0 VERNON SELLING TRADE "DISCOUNT 11/09/99 $740.40 QUALITY WINE COST OF,GOODS SOLD LI 770473 -0. 50TH ST .SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 11/09/99 - $14.75 QUALITY WINE, TRADE DISCOUNTS 770473 -0 50TH ST,SELLIN TRADE DISCOUNT 11/09/99 $37.11 - QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 770474 -0 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 11/09/99 -$0.36 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 770474 -0 YORK SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT 11/09/99 $636.56 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 770475 -0 YORK SELLING. CST OF GD LIQU 11/09/.99 - $12.67 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 770475 -0 YORK SELLING TRADE.DISCOUNT 11/09/99 $898.30 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 770476 -0 VERNON SELLING.CST OF GD LIQU 11/09/99 - $17.91 _QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS. 770476 -0 VERNON SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT 11/09/99 $8.25 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI'770556 70 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU < *> $32,353.97* COUNCIL CHECK SISTER 02- DEC - 1999.(1:. ,) page3- CHECK NO CHECK DT CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE, PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. -'------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------'---------------- 203845 11/12/99 $310,000.00 CITY OF EDINA Payroll Transfer 111299 LIQUOR PROG CASH 11/12/99 - $310,000.00 CITY OF EDINA CASH - TREASURER'S 111299 LIQUOR PROG CASH < *> $0.00* 203846 11/16/99 $195.00 Thompson, Keith Teaching AC 111599 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $195.00* 203848 11/17/99 $14,195.35 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVIC Form 941TID41- 6005118 111699 -,CENT SVC GENER PENSIONS < *> $14,195.35* 20.3849 11/23/99 $375,000.00 CITY OF EDINA Payroll Transfer 112399 LIQUOR PROG CASH 11/23/99 - $375,000.00 CITY OF EDINA Payroll Transfer 112399 LIQUOR PROG CASH < *> $0.00* 205357 11/15/99 $16.59 AT & T TELEPHONE 11/09 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE, 11/15/99 $61.68 AT & T TELEPHONE 111599 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE < *> $78.27* 205358 11/15/99 $858.29 MAXFLI GOLF:DIVISION Merch. 2100259 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 9425 < *> $858.29* 205359 11/15/99 $19.62 PERA Contribution PPEND 11 111599 GENERAL FD PRO P.E.R.A. PAYAB < *> $19.62* 205360 11/15/99 $59,669.29 PERA Contributions to PERA 11/15 GENERAL FD PRO P.E.R.A. PAYAB < *> $59,669.29* 205361 11/15/99 $4,000.00 POSTMASTER Postage 110999 CENT SVC GENER POSTAGE < *> $4,000.00* 205362 11/15/99 $285.00 POSTMASTER Postage for Newslette 11/09 CENT SVC GENER POSTAGE < *> $285.00* 205365 11/15/99 - $81.50 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 766541- 0�YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/15/99 - $14.64 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 768387 -0 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 11/15/99 $523.20 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 770801 -0 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/15/99 -$5.19 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 770801 -0 VERNON SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT 11/15/99 $1,139.00. QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 771420 -0 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 11/15/99 - $11.36 QUALITY WINE TRADE'DISCOUNTS 771420 -0 50TH ST SELLIN TRADE DISCOUNT 11/15/99 $1,201.75 QUALITY WINE COST OF.GOODS SOLD WI_.771421- O.VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE' 11/15/99 - $11.98 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 771421 -0 VERNON SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT 11/15/99 $1,314.75 QUALITY WINE COST.OF -GOODS SOLD WI 771422 -0 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/15/99 - $13.11 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 771422 -0 YORK SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT 11/15/99 $1,744.20 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 772355 -0 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/15/99 - $17.25 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 772355 -0 YORK SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT 11/15/99 .$1,781.56 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 772356 -0 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 11/15/99 - $17.63 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 772356 -0 50TH ST SELLIN TRADE DISCOUNT 11/15/99 $1,739.00 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 772390 -0 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/15/99 - $17.16 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 772390 -0 VERNON SELLING TRADE'DISCOUNT 11/15/99 $1,203.00 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 772403 -0 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/15/99 - $12.00 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 772403 70 VERNON SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT. 11/15/99 $785.91 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 772452 -0 YORK SELLING . CST OF GD LIQU 11/15/99 - $15.67 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 772452 -0 YORK SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT $5,523.43 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 772479 -0 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU .11/15/99 11/15/99 - $109.64 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 772479 -.0 YORK SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 02- DEC -1999 (13:59) page4 CHECK NO CHECK DT CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE_ PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------7--------- 205365 11/15/99 $1,946.31 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 772528 -0 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 11/15/99 - $38.72 QUALITY WINE. TRADE DISCOUNTS 772528 -0 50TH ST SELLIN TRADE DISCOUNT 11/15/99 $3,695.55 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 772529 -0 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 11/15/99 - $73.55 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 172529 -0 VERNON- SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT 11/15/99 $285.75 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 772537 -0 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/15/99 -$2.85 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 772537 -0 YORK SELLING - TRADE DISCOUNT < *> $22,441.16* 205366 11/15/99 $340.51 SEELYE PLASTICS Primer, PVC, PVC Ceme 530317 RESTROOM FACIL CIP, 3326 < *> $340.51* 205367 11/15/99 $196.34 U.S. WEST COMMUNICATION TELEPHONE 110499 PUMP & LIFT ST TELEPHONE . < *> $196.34* 205368 11/15/99 $530.11 WILSON SPORTING GOODS C Merch. 2149693 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 6325 < *> $530.11* 205369 11/23/99 $11.50 AT & T TELEPHONE 05307512 CENT.SVC GENER TELEPHONE 11/23/99 $11.50 AT & T TELEPHONE 05307512 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE < *> $23.00* 205370 11/23/99 $22.49 AT &T TELEPHONE 01634624 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE < *> $22.49* 205371 11/23/99 $3.21 AT &T TELEPHONE 05307908 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE 11/23/99 $3.21 AT &T TELEPHONE 05307918 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE 11/23/99 $3.21 AT &T TELEPHONE 05307918 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE < *> $9.63* 205372 11/23/99 $5,112.89 DELTA DENTAL Dental premiums for 1 112299 CENT SVC GENER HOSPITALIZATIO < *> $5,112.89* 205373 11/23/99 $424.57 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS Long Distance Nov 02031921 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE < *> $424.57* 205374 11/23/99 $82,989.76 MEDICA Premiums to Media for 111699 CENT SVC GENER HOSPITALIZATIO < *> $82,989.76* 205375 11/23/99 $4,667.45 MEDICA Premium low option 12 112299 CENT SVC GENER HOSPITALIZATIO < *> $4,667.45* 205377 11%23/99 $1,744.00 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 771368 -0 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/23/99 - $17.29 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 771368 -0 YORK SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT 11/23/99 - $45.91 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 772197 -0 YORK SELLING CST OF GD.WINE 11/23/99 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 773740 -0 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/23/99 .$523.20 -$5.19 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 773740 -0 YORK SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT 11/23/99 $4,705.76 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 774934 -0 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 11/23/99 _ - $46.55 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 774934 -0 YORK SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT 11/23/99 $3,586.06 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 775144 -0 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 11/23/99 - $71.30 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 775144 -0 YORK SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT 11/23/99 $1,887.07 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 775150 -0 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 11/23/99 - $37.49 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 775150 -0 50TH.ST SELLIN TRADE DISCOUNT 11/23/99 $4,468.67 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 775238- O.VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 11/23/99 - $88.92 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 775238 -0 VERNON SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT 11/23/99 $7,744.22 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 775315 -0 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD "WINE r COUNCIL CHECK .6GISTER 02- DEC -1999 (13:59) pa &e5 CHECK NO CHECK DT CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 205377 11/23/99 - $76.62 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS. 205384 775315 -0 VERNON SELLING-TRADE DISCOUNT 205385 11/23/99 $3,679.75 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 775317 -0 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 11/23/99 - $36.43 QUALITY WINE. TRADE DISCOUNTS 175317 -0 50TH ST SELLIN TRADE DISCOUNT 11/23/99 - $56.61 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 775622 -0 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 205387 11/23/99 $1,780.42 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 776827 -0 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 11/23/99 - $35.41 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 776827 -0 50TH ST SELLIN TRADE DISCOUNT 11/23/99 $1,854.83 QUALITY WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 776872 -0 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 11/23/99 - $18.38 QUALITY WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 776872 -0 50TH ST SELLIN TRADE DISCOUNT < *> $31,437.88* 205378 11/23/99 $55.76 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 61228590 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE 11/23/99 $223.10 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 61292522 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE 11/23/99 -$1.57 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 61294386 SKATING & HOCK TELEPHONE 11/23/99 $58."71 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 61294433 BUILDING MAINT TELEPHONE 11/23/99 $46.68 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 61294476 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE < *> $,382.68* 205379 11/30/99 205380 11/30/99 r *> 205381 11/30/99 205382 11/30/99 205383 11/30/99 205384 11/30/99 205385 11/30/99 11/30/99 11/30/99 11/30/99 11/30/99 11/30/99 11/30/99. 11/30/99 11/30/99 11/30/99 11/30/99 11/30/99 205386 11/30/99 205387 11/30/99 $270.96 ANOKA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT WARRANT GENERAL FD PRO DUE TO OTHR GO $270.96* $1,258.37 At & T Wireless CDPD 10125789 COPS MORE GRAN EQUIP REPLACEM $1,258.37* $220.00 FILLMORE COUNTY SHERIFF OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT WARRANT GENERAL FD PRO DUE TO OTHR GO $220.00* $650.80 North Hennepin Communit PUBLIC WORKS CLASSES 112499 PARK MAINTENAN CONF & SCHOOLS $650.80* $19.62 PERA $19.62* $62,066.31 $62,066.31* $8.25 - $230.94 $4,006.10 .- $79.70 $3,049.92 - $30.14 $7,147.10 - $70.89 $2,628.69 - $52.29 $106.50 -$1.05 $16,481.55* PERA QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE QUALITY WINE CONTRIBUTION TO PERA - 11/29/99 GENERAL FD PRO P.E.R.A. PAYAB CONTRIBUTION TO PERA 11/29/99 GENERAL FD PRO P.E.R.A. PAYAB COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 770552 -0 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 775280 -0 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 776797 -0 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU TRADE DISCOUNTS 776797 -0 YORK SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 776871 -0 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 776871 -0 YORK SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 777138 -0 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 777138 -0 VERNON SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 777448 -0 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU TRADE DISCOUNTS 777448 -0 VERNON SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 777643 -0 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE TRADE DISCOUNTS 777643 -0 VERNON SELLING TRADE DISCOUNT $250.00 Ramsey County Sherriff' OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT WARRANT GENERAL FD PRO DUE TO OTHR GO $250.00* $70.53 U.S. WEST COMMUNICATION TELEPHONE $70.53* 612 938- VANVALKENBURG TELEPHONE COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 02- DEC -1999 (13:59) pageb.. CHECK NO CHECK DT CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT' PO NUM. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 205388 11/30/99 $397.53 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 612 -D08- CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE <.* $397.,5.3* $426,971.43* COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY FOR HAND CHECKS 2- Dec -99 page 7 FUND # . 10 GENERAL FUND $300,997.63 FUND #- 15- WORKING CAPITAL $1,328.90 FUND # 23 ART CENTER $195.00 FUND # 27 GOLF COURSE FUND $1,855.57 FUND # 40 UTILITY FUND $196.34 FUND # 50 LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND - _ $122,397.99 $426,971.43. YOUR SIGN OF QUALITY IN TWIN CITIES REMODELING FOR MORE THAN TWENTY YEARS. November 24, 1999 The Honorable Mayor Dennis Maetzold City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424.1394 RE: Condemnation Dear Denny: Before the City makes any final commitment to a redevelopment project, which includes the taking of my building, I thought it only fair to let you know my position in this matter. To begin with, it is impossible for me to believe that the City could ever have a redevelopment project which includes a better use of my particular land or creates more tax revenue for the City than my building does. Indeed, it is my understanding that it is not the actual redevelopment of my property that has caused the inclusion of my building, but rather a desire to assist a residential developer who is building homes in Edina and who objects to my building being near the entrance to his development. I consider that an extremely poor reason to take my building and cause the kind of damage and disruption to eight businesses located in my building that this condemnation will cause. I have made a very significant effort to find a comparable property within the area of my building in which to relocate my business and, in fact, can find no suitable land or building. While I have the City's assurance that I will be treated fairly, I have concluded that the entire process and the reasons for your taking my building and disrupting all cf these businesses are inherently unfair. There is simply no way that you can adequately compensate me for the loss I am going to sustain, let alone the losses of my tenants. You also need to understand I am going to take whatever legal action is appropriate to stop this condemnation at its inception and keep my building. Thank you. Yours very truly, Edward M. Noonan Noonan Construction, Inc. cc: HRA Members • 5244 EDEN CIRCLE • EDINA, MN 55436 -2334 • • PHONE 915-1000 • Fax 915-1200 • Mary Ann Martinek 4425 Brookside Terrace Edina, MN 55435 929 -1236 November 22, 1999 Mr. Dennis Maetzold, Mayor City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Kunz -Lewis Site Development Dear Mayor Maetzold: As a 50 year resident of Edina, I am writing to express my concerns regarding the above development: 1) I hope there will be some Senior Low Income Housing included. 2) I believe Edina has enough "grandiose" high- market stone mansions... as the village flavor of our suburb is already a major loss. 3) I hope this area (close to my neighborhood) will not look like a Edinburgh cookie - cutter/high density /cramed together complex. 4) I hope the new library looks very much like our 50th Street Library and not like the "space shin" on York Ave. which is austere and also difficult for seniors to maneuver, having to cross a busy parking lot and up all the steps then up elevators, etc. ( I know because I took my 88 year -old mother there just recently... first & last time I might add). Well, thank you for your time and attention to this letter. Sincerely, Mary Martinek cc: Planning Dept. /1Ca^a,.s� 11 -19 -99 To: Mike 3utari, Police Chief Edina. I am writing in regard to the Edina Police Jept. lV?any of us long time residence of Edina feel that there is an overstaffing of the police dept. Because of the relatively low crime rate in Edina, police do not have inuch to d4M, alot of spare time, and as a result, spend most of their time harassing local people with issuing of tickets for Yery minor traffic infrations. Warnings would be more appropriate in many cases. By decreasing the staff of police officers, tax::,-. money could be saved and an ajustment in pbliQy,feelings about the Edina Police Jept.. could impro Ve. As of now there is a lot of dislike reg,!rding the above. Sincer6ly% F i� ' .`J neon 6320 at. Johns Ave. Edina, Mn. 55424 9 26- 6469 cc: Gordon Hughes Dennis L,aetzold JAMES VAN VALKENBURG 4204 Philbrook Lane Edina, Minnesota 55424 (612) 922 -2982 1 7 November',, 1999 Mayor Dennis Maetzold Edina 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, Minn 55424 Res Crime Prevention Officer Dear Denniss As you are aware The Edina Crime fund has jointly sponsobed the emplyment of the Crime Prevention Officer. In 1995 we paid 1001% of her salary. 1996 - -90 /, 1997--8% etc to 60 J by 1999• It was jeft open after that date. On behalf of the Crime Fund we would now like to suggest the following arrangements 2000 50 % 2001 40 2002 30 2003 20 20o4 to These sums would be paid by the Crime Fund. May we hear the reaction of the Council to the above? The Crime Fund has shared this financial arrangement, but definitely does not exercise any control or direction over the Prevention Officer. We will be changing our name shortly to "Edina Crime Prevention Fund ". Sincer®li James an V. ( veep) CCs Mike Satarri Gordon Hughes Don Peterson 8LOOMINGTON EDEN ►RAIRIL • [DINA • MA ►L[ GROW • MINNITONKA • ►LYMOUTN • RICNFIRD 1494 CORRIDOR COMMISSION 8080 Mitchell Road • Eden Prabie MN 55344 • (612 )699.4228 • FAX 690 -4094 TO: Mike Opatz, City of Maple Grove Barb Senness, City of Plymouth Curt Gutoske, City of Minnetonka Dave Lindahl, City of Eden Prairie Craig Larsen, City of Edina Larry Lee, City of Bloomington Tom Foley, City of Richfield FROM: Lisa Raduenz, Consultant to I -494 Corridor Commission DATE: 11/29/99 RE: I -494 Transit Providers' Plan for Transit Services, Facilities and Infrastructure Along I -494 Corridor ached please find a copy of the I -494 Transit Providers' Subcommittee Plan for Transit Services, Facilities and i,lfrastructure that was submitted to the Metropolitan Council at its request on November 15, 1999. This document was written with the cooperation and participation of the following regional transit providers: Southwest Metro, Plymouth Metrolink, Maple Grove Transit, Metro Transit and Minnesota Valley Transit Authority. It is intended to serve as a planning "guide" for the Met Council's request to the 2000 Legislature for transit funding, and will also act as a "work in progress" for the 494 Corridor Commission as it continues to refine transit service planning along the 494 corridor. I would greatly appreciate it if each of you would make a copy and distribute it internally to your Mayor and Councilmembers, as well as to the City Manager, Public Works or City Engineer, and Corridor Commission elected official. Should you have any questions, please feel free to give me a call at (651) 227 -1905. Thanks for your assistance. I -494 CORRIDOR COMMISSION Plan for Transit Services, Facilities and Infrastructure and Land Use Policies along the I -494 Corridor November 1999 Prepared By: I -494 Corridor Commission Transit Providers' Subcommittee COMPONENTS OF PROPOSED 1-494 TRANSIT SERVICES SERVICE CONCEPT The Transit Providers Advisory Sub - Committee of the 1 -494 Corridor Commission has developed a transit service concept plan to deliver reasonable, cost effective suburb -to- suburb transit capabilities that are designed help serve the travel needs within the I -494 corridor. The Sub- Committee decided on the following principals for serving these suburban markets: • A minimum 30 minute frequency of service (peak period only). • Line -haul based services focused on park & ride lots along the I -494 corridor. • Minimization of transfers. • Competitive transit speed (make use of transit advantages — travel times no more than twice SOV times). • Development of distribution system at employer end maximizing use of existing employer hubs. • Fare advantages (e.g., MetroPass) that can be used on all types of service products. • Seamless service provision that is transparent to the customer. • Offer a variety of service products for customer choice. Based upon these principals, four transit service delivery modes are proposed to meet the diverse needs of passengers and businesses within the corridor. Hub -to -Hub Express Service To provide the maximum speed possible for passengers traveling longer distances within the corridor, hub - to -hub express services should be provided that will utilize transit advantages wherever they exist to rapidly move people from their trip origins to near their destinations. An example of this hub -to -hub express service would be an express bus running from Southwest Station in Eden Prairie to the Mall of America transit hub in Bloomington with no intermediate stops. Limited Stop Hub -to -Hub Service In addition to express service, there is a need for limited stop hub -to -hub service within the corridor to meet the needs of those who are traveling shorter distances to /from major origins and major destinations. This service will rely on key transfer points along the corridor for rapid passenger loading and unloading, and to take advantage of existing or planned distributor facilities and services. An example of this limited stop hub -to -hub service would be a bus originating at Southwest Station in Eden Prairie that makes intermediate transfer point stops at Normandale Boulevard, France Avenue, the I- 35W/82 ed Street Station and the Mall of America. Local Line Haul Service Due to the proliferation of multiple employment sites along the I -494 corridor, hub -to -hub express or limited stop hub -to -hub service will need to be supplemented by local line haul transit services operating primarily along the service road network adjacent to I -494. These services will be slower than the hub -to- hub services, but will provide critical links to employment and shopping destinations located in a linear manner along the corridor. With a reasonable frequency of service this local line haul transit component will help meet the needs of dozens of sites that would otherwise be difficult or impossible to reasonably serve with the hub -to -hub services. An example of this local line haul service is the new Route 590 that will start service in mid - December, 1999. It is a joint service between Metro Transit and Southwest Metro Transit operating on a local line haul basis along the I -494 corridor service roads. Connecting Routes and Distributor Services In order to move people efficiently to and from points in and near the I -494 corridor it will be important to rely on a network of connecting routes and distributor services that connect with the express hub -to -hub, limited stop hub -to -hub and the local line haul services at pre - arranged transfer points. This network will utilize a combination of delivery systems, including existing nordVsouth local collector services operated by Metro Transit (along France Avenue, Penn Avenue, Lyndale Avenue, etc.), special circulator vehicles transporting people to /from employment sites not otherwise served by the local line haul services, and employer shuttle vans. An analysis of existing Metro Transit services crossing the I -494 corridor will be necessary to determine service level adequacy and to assist in the development of ancillary circulator services and employer shuttle vans. SERVICE DELIVERY VARIATIONS IN CORRIDOR SEGMENTS The I -494 corridor contains multiple segments that have varying characteristics relative to the need for transit services and the ability to deliver those services. For the purposes of this report, the corridor is broken into two distinct segments, the segment between 34th Avenue South on the east in Bloomington and Southwest Station on the west in Eden Prairie, and the segment between I -94 on the north and Southwest Station on the south. The service delivery modes identified as necessary and practical within the east -west segment between 34's Avenue South and Southwest Station would include all four service delivery modes identified above. Employment densities, the availability of service roads along I -494, and the local cross street connections all add service planning flexibility that encourage a broad mix of service delivery modes. The segment of I -494 running north -south between Southwest Station and I -94 poses less of an opportunity to increase the service mix. The service modes identified for this segment are the hub -to -hub express services and some limited stop hub -to -hub services. The only viable "service road" along this segment is County Road 60/61, which is somewhat removed from the freeway, travels through extensive single family residential areas, and is only two lane wide in many areas. The better way to deliver service in this segment is to develop a series of park & ride lots and transfer facilities at key interchanges along the segment, supplemented with circulators, employer shuttle vans, and utilizing any other transit connection potentials that already exist or may be reasonably implemented that will operate to /from these park & rides and transfer facilities. The addition of transit advantages, such as bus shoulder lanes and HOV ramp meter bypasses will be critical to the success of transit services within the north-south segment of the corridor. CONSTRUCTION PERIOD SERVICES Due to the massive disruption that is likely to occur throughout the I -494 corridor during construction, a supplemental transit service plan is necessary to meet anticipated demand. In the east -west segment of the corridor it will be critical to develop a series of temporary park & ride lots with extensive parking capabilities that can serve as interceptors for persons who would otherwise be driving on 1 -494. A series of shuttle buses will have to added to the service mix identified above to transport people to /from these park & ride facilities and to /from their employment sites. Services that would normally run on the freeway itself will generally be forced to run on adjoining service roads. Special engineering work, such as modifications in stop light timings and special transit advantages, will need to be implemented along these service roads to minimize bottlenecks. The use of special advantages, such as Opticom, should be explored as ways of encouraging transit use. In the north -south segment, the availability of park & ride lots will dictate the level of service that can be delivered within the corridor during construction. Without these park & ride lots people will generally not be able to get to the connection points to take advantage of the planned transit service modes. Express services would likely operate on T.H. 169, where transit advantages are either in place or are planned for the near future, and only returning to the I -494 area at transit hubs.. Limited stop hub -to -hub services would utilize both T.H. 169 and County Road 60/61 as much as possible to avoid congestion on I -494 itself, connecting to key points along I -494 at park & ride lot sites. VANPOOL AND CARPOOL SERVICES In order to achieve SOV reduction goals in the 1 -494 corridor before, during and after construction the modal split among HOVs in the corridor must be supplemented by carpools and vanpools,. Coordination between Metro Commuter Services and the I -494 Corridor Commission will be essential to achieving effective levels of carpooling and vanpooling essential to the proper traffic flow reductions envisioned. Park & ride lots along the corridor, particularly those that will be established exclusively for the construction period, should be made available for carpools and vanpools as well. Businesses along and near the corridor must be encouraged to establish carpool and vanpool programs through a combination of incentives and an extensive marketing campaign. Individuals participating in carpools or vanpools should be given preferential parking locations at businesses, vanpool fare assistance and special recognition for their efforts. To the extent possible, public subsidization of vanpools should be explored and implemented as a means of encouraging vanpooling through public /private partnerships. Special employers shuttle vans should be developed to transport people between transfer points along the corridor and business not otherwise served by transit. The most likely candidates for these employer shuttle vans would be office parks, clustered businesses in close geographic proximity to one another and businesses in isolated locations. Marketing efforts should include employer /employee meetings, direct mail, newspaper advertising and radio and television spots.' Concentrated marketing efforts should take place during the months leading up to actual construction in specific sectors of the I -494 corridor. The Guaranteed Ride Home program should be expanded to include as many individuals as possible that participate in HOV programs. Employers should also be encouraged to implement TDM programs at their businesses, including such things as staggered work shifts, flex time and incentive programs to encourage employees to carpool, vanpool or ride transit. The employers in the corridor need to be very aware of the potential impacts on their businesses and employees as a result of the I -494 construction, and how these impacts can be mitigated by TDM participation. TRANSIT FACILITIES In order to provide the transit service concepts outlined in this report, it is critical that necessary and appropriate transit facilities be added along the 1 -494 corridor. Bus -Only Shoulder Lanes Constructed on I -494 and the urban freeways connecting to it, these transit advantages will be necessary to provide the maximum speed and service reliability possible for passengers traveling longer distances within the corridor. An example of this would be hub -to -hub express service running from Southwest Station in Eden Prairie to the Mall of America transit hub in Bloomington with one or two intermediate stops. Another application of this concept would be bus only shoulder privileges on local collector streets which will allow buses to move to the front of a line of vehicles waiting at a red light, thus saving time and increasing schedule reliability. One possible design might be to allow buses to drive in right tuna only lanes, continue across an intersection when the traffic light changes, and make a passenger stop at a median island of appropriate width. HO Ramp Meter Bypasses In addition to bus only shoulder lanes, there is a need for faster access to freeways by buses and other HOVs. The most reliable way to do this is with separate bypass lanes for HOW In some cases where there is no right of way available, approaching buses can be allowed to speed up the ramp meter signal through the use of Opticom technology to significantly benefit travel times. Busways Busways are roadways built for the exclusive use of transit buses. Usually they are constructed on their own right of way, separated from other roads. These facilities can significantly enhance transit service quality, and can provide rapid and efficient movement of large numbers of passengers. A busway generally features on -line stops or stations similar to those of a rail line. Some of these stops would be located at transit centers, enhancing access and providing fast service. There are limited opportunities for busways in the I -494 corridor due to limited land availability, but the option should be thoroughly studied. One option is to explore the placement of a busway within the service road corridor network that parallels 1 -494 to the north and the south on the east/west segment. The rewards in terms of sustained higher ridership could be significant. Transit Centers or Hubs Due to the proliferation of multiple employment sites along the I -494 corridor, hub -to -hub express or limited stop hub -to -hub service will need to be supplemented by local transit services operating on the service road network adjacent to I -494. A well designed route network will also include connections to existing radial bus lines. It is essential that these services meet at safe, comfortable transit centers (or hubs). These facilities, at a minimum, should feature passenger waiting shelter, lighting, route, schedule and fare information. The largest facilities used by the largest numbers of passengers, should have a climate controlled, enclosed shelter. The opportunities which may exist to locate these in established or planned commercial/office buildings should be carefully considered. A nreliminary list of transit hub locations on or near I Maple Grove (Hemlock La. & I -694) Plymouth ( TH 55 & I -494) Minnetonka (Plymouth Rd. Transit Center, Highway 7 & I -494) Eden Prairie (Southwest Station) Bloomington (Hwy. 100 & I494 ?, France Ave. & I -494 ?, 82nd St. Station, Mall of America) Edina (Southdale, Centennial Lakes Park ?) Park & Rides Most of the residential areas that are home to the I -494 corridor commuters are settled at a medium to low population density. This is especially true in Eagan, Mendota Heights, western Bloomington, Eden Prairie, Minnetonka, Plymouth and Maple Grove. If employers' parking remains free, it will be very difficult to attract new transit riders. However, if very strong employer sponsored transit fare reductions are enacted (i.e.: Metropass), making transit very inexpensive, there is a potential demand for park & ride express service. The park & ride locating criteria now under development by Metropolitan Council should be followed is determining the size and locations. A very critical criteria for siting new park &.rides in this corridor will be finding the point at which traffic congestion will be chronic and significant. It is important to consider that this point is likely to shift further out from Bloomington once construction begins. A preliminary list of Park & Ride locations on or near I -494: Maple Grove (Hemlock La. & 1 -694) Plymouth (Hwy. 55 & 1 -494) Minnetonka (1 -394 & Carlson Pkwy., Hwy. 7 & I -494) Eden Prairie (Southwest Station) Bloomington (France Ave. SW of I -494, Mall of America LRT Station site, I -35W & 98'" St.) Eagan (I -494 & Pilot Knob Rd.) Transfer Facilities In addition to transit centers and park & ride facilities, a series of transfer facilities should be developed at key interchange locations along the east/west segment of I -494. These transfer facilities will allow I -494 services to connect with north/south radial services, circulator buses and employer shuttle vans at points near large employment concentrations. Transfer facilities should include bus shelters, bus pull -outs, benches, signage and lighting where appropriate. A meliminary list of Transfer Facility locations on or near I -494: Normandale Blvd. & I -494 France Ave. & I -494 Xerxes Ave. & W. 76'" St. Xerxes Ave. & Southtown Dr. Penn Ave. & I -494 Lyndale Ave. & I -494 Nicollet Ave. & I -494 Portland Ave. & I -494 24ih Ave. & I -494 34'h Ave. & I -494 6 CONSTRUCTION PERIOD SERVICES/FACILITES Due to the massive disruption that is likely to occur throughout the I -494 corridor during construction, a supplemental transit service facilities plan is necessary to meet anticipated demand. In the east -west segment of the corridor it will be critical to develop a series of park & ride lots (the list in the previous section is suggested as a starting point), with extensive parking capabilities that can serve as interceptors for persons who would otherwise be driving on I -494. A series of bus routes will have to added to the service mix identified above to transport people to /from these park & ride facilities and to /from their employment sites. Services that would normally run on the freeway itself will generally be forced to run on adjoining service roads (ie:79'" /80' Street or 76/770' Street). Special engineering work, such as modifications in stop light timings and special transit advantages, will need to be implemented along these service roads to minimize bottlenecks. The use of special advantages, such as Opticom, should be explored as ways of encouraging transit use. These advantages will be especially useful at very busy signalized intersections such as at Highwood Dr. & Hwy. 169. In the north -south segment, the availability of park & ride lots will dictate the level of service that can be delivered within the corridor during construction. Without these park & ride lots people will generally not be able to get to the connection points to take advantage of the planned transit service modes. Express services would likely operate on T.H. 169, where transit advantages are either in place or are planned for the near future, and only returning to the I -494 area at transit hubs. Limited stop hub -to -hub services would utilize both T.H. 169 and County Road 60/61 as much as possible to avoid congestion on I -494 itself, connecting to key points along I -494 at park & ride lot sites. Park & ride lots along the corridor should be made available for use by employer shuttle vans, carpools and vanpools as well. This should encourage businesses along and near the corridor to establish carpool and vanpool programs. Individuals participating in carpools or vanpools should be given preferential parking locations at businesses, and possibly, their own sections in park & ride lots. Special consideration should be given to the development of temporary interceptor park & ride lots at the edges of the regularly congested segments of I -494, such in Rogers at I -94 and T.H. 101, in order to minimize the flow of traffic through the construction zones. Connecting transit services should be planned to operate from these "remote" park & ride facilities to key destinations within the I -494 corridor. COMPONENTS OF COMPATIBLE 1-494 LAND USE STRATEGIES REGIONAL BLUEPRINT POLICIES Significant investment in transit services and infrastructure that are well planned in the I -494 corridor will foster the goals and policies of the Regional Blueprint: Regional Blueprint Policy 1 (Action Step 1B). This policy recognizes the importance of making investments in the regional transit system for economic development. The projects are an important investment, which will enhance intermodal linkages to numerous employment centers inside and outside the corridor. Regional Blueprint Policy 3 (Action Step 3A). This policy recognizes the need to encourage and foster local transit- and pedestrian- oriented efforts through transit enhancements that meet the changing needs of local residents. The proposed projects would promote efforts to reshape physical environments in order to enhance neighborhoods and communities. Regional Blueprint Policy 3 (Action Step 3C). This policy recognizes the need consider the effects on neighboring communities. Trips within this corridor have multiple origin and destination points within and without the corridor, and often from around the State, so improvements will have a positive effect on other communities by fostering transit use. Regional Blueprint Policy 5 (Action Step 5B). This policy recognizes the need to focus investments toward development within the urban area. The projects would creates a more efficient transit system in and around the I- 494/694 beltway. Regional Blueprint Policy l (Action Step 5H). This policy recognizes the need to give priority to maintaining existing facilities in the urban service area. This policy also recognizes the need to support regional systems through upgrades in areas of previous investment. The proposed project will improve conditions on the highly congested I -494 corridor by reducing single occupancy vehicle travel on this existing facility. RIGHT -OF -WAY AND SETBACK REQUIREMENTS The Met Council and communities in the corridor need to have the authority and funding resources to acquire the necessary right -of -way to implement the transit infrastructure. The process needs to be streamlined so that development is timely and efficient. Building setback requirements need to be better coordinated in order to make transit services more attractive, convenient and efficient. Excessive setback requirements are a detriment to transit and pedestrian- friendly land use development. Further, allow a rapid review and approval process should be implemented to allow segments of existing setbacks to be converted to dedicated busways. TRANSPORTATION MANAGEMENT PLAN REQUIREMENTS The Metropolitan Council and communities in the corridor should be granted the authority to require and enforce Transportation Management Plans (TMPs) for employers or employment sites of 100 or more employees. TMPs include tools that can have significant impacts on SOV congestion. TMPs need to be "living" documents that a have specific action steps. COMMERCIAL I HOUSING MIXES IN TRANSIT HUB FACILITIES A critical element in the overall solution to congestion in the I -494 corridor lies with the appropriate balance of land uses within and adjacent to transit hub facilities. The mixing of commercial and residential developments within and near transit hub projects is paramount to the goal of reducing single- occupant trips. Strategies of the Metropolitan Council's Transit Redesign set the framework for such development. Communities in the corridor need the support and influence of the Metropolitan Council to' see that these strategies are implemented: Transit Redesign Strategy B. This policy recognizes the need to make transit vehicles more competitive with the single occupancy vehicle and develop a coordinated capital investment strategy to advance the transit redesign process. The proposed projects will increase park- and -ride availability within a highly congested corridor /potential transit market and create direct highway access and priority access for transit vehicles from the Regional Mix Use Area. Transit Redesign Strategy F. This policy recognizes the need to encourage cities to' create more pedestrian and transit- oriented communities that can be more effectively and efficiently served by transit. The proposed projects include transit hubs in transit - oriented, mixed -use developments, which promotes higher- density land use development and shared parking. Transit Redesign Chapter 9. The proposed projects seek to develop a truly "transit- oriented community" with high- density commercial/office development with transit access as the cornerstone to the successful project. 9 RELATED SERVICES FOR EMPLOYERS AND EMPLOYEES ALONG 1-494 Section III — Related Services for Employers and Employers Along I -494 Collector/Distributor networks for local employers There is.a variety of collector distributor networks in existence and there are others to be added to supplement the system. Those existing include: Connecting transit routes operated by Metro Transit, the BE Line, Southwest Metro, and Plymouth Metrolink For the area along the east -west portion of I -494, Metro Transit and the BE Line currently operate - north -south routes that would connect to I -494 service. These routes exist along Cahill Road, Bush Lake Road, France Avenue, York Avenue, Penn Avenue, Lyndale Avenue, Nicollet Avenue, Portland Avenue, 12`s AvenueBloomington Avenue, and Cedar. Any business located north or south of I -494 along these streets would be able to take advantage of these existing connecting routes for transporting their employees. For the area along the north -south portion of I -494, there is another type of service available. Plymouth Metrolink and Southwest Metro Transit offer distributor networks in the form of Dial -A- Ride, Circulators, and local fixed route services that connect passengers at park and ride lots. Usually operated with smaller vehicles (less than 25- passenger capacity) these routes are designed to operate within the more indirect street system of the suburban communities served. The services are also designed to deliver riders to an exact address or building, as opposed to the comer of the street upon which the business is located. Additional services to supplement these existing collector /distributor services would include: • Transit - agency- operated vanpools designed to meet riders at designated locations not currently served by either of the existing systems and transport them'to a single business, multi- occupant building, or business park. Vanpools would operate during peak times for these purposes. • Business - operated vanpools offering the same service as transit- agency- operated vanpools that would then be available during the day for business usage. • Transit- agency- operated shuttle services offering the same services as the vanpools, but designed to carry more passengers to more concentrated locations, such as a- bii§ii -ess park or a very large multi- occupant building or retail center. • Circulator services during midday times to support noon -time activities including lunches, errands, shopping, etc. These services could be operated by vans or small bus shuttle. The providers may be transit agencies, businesses, or the retailers who receive the noon -time traffic. • Appointment or reservation services at any time during the day to support activities such as doctor and dental appointments, car repairs, regularly scheduled meetings, etc. The providers may be transit agencies or businesses and would likely be operated by vans. 10 • Group ride services for businesses and institutions should be made available. For example, if groups of employees need training off -site, businesses should be encouraged to seek transit solutions to providing the transportation for those events. Company picnics, seminars, business events, etc., should take advantage of this type of transit service. Service Marketing Aggressive marketing is needed. The main reason is that transit service is a "new product" for these businesses and employees. Added to that is the fact that people in this area have become dependent upon their cars and enjoy their "freedom" of movement. Basically, this is going to be a cultural or behavioral change for people. They will need to understand that "freedom" still exists with transit, but they will need to think about it differently. Several areas will need to be addressed: • Businesses do not intuitively understand how transit benefits them —they need to learn. It will be incumbent upon those marketing various services to direct a portion of the marketing efforts toward explaining how businesses "win" by supporting transit efforts. • Programs with incentives should be provided to encourage people to try transit on a regular basis. Given the current status of employee turnover, these types of programs should be regularly provided through new employee packets, employment recruitment organizations within the corridor should provide the information for their recruits. Transit "rewards" could also be offered for those who have ridden for an extended period of time. Information on transit alternatives and programs should be readily available, frequently updated, and plentiful. Schedules and information on promotions should have a presence at all major businesses and public locations. Information should be provided to employee newsletter writers on a regular basis to keep transit in front of the employees. For example, an employee may not need an "appointment service trip" everyday, but when they do, they should know where to go get information, how to arrange the trip, and how much it costs. • Publicity about these services needs to be aggressive and frequent. Every opportunity should be taken to provide news releases and "stories" about the service in the local papers. Events should be sponsored at business parks or other major business locations to draw attention to the specific services provided. Employers should be placed on a newsletter /e- mail list to keep them informed of upcoming events and changes. I -494 Transportation Management Associations (TMAs) The I -494 Corridor Commission is in the process of initiating and assisting in the implementation of a series of privately- sponsored Transportation Management Associations, or TMAs, at strategic locations along the I -494 corridor. TMAs bring together diverse employers located within the same geographic area to provide incentives and opportunities for employees to reduce single occupant vehicle trips to and from employment sites during peak hours. Each TMA consists of private, for - profit corporate members who pay annual dues for TMA membership. Dues support the upkeep of the TMA and activities and incentives sponsored by the TMA for employees of TMA members. At the present time there are two TMAs in operation along the I -494 corridor; one located at the junction of I -494 and T.H. 62 in Minnetonka (Minnetonka Corporate Center), and the other in its beginning stages in the Golden Triangle Area of Eden Prairie (junction of T.H. 212, T.H. 169 and I -494). 11 Service Incentives Some standard and some new service incentives will be provided as part of the service. Standard incentives include: • Reduced cost pass programs • Free ride coupons • Free ride days • First -time rider incentives • New employee incentives • Guaranteed Ride Home Program New incentives may include: • Subsidized "appointment or reservation" service • Midday circulators • Day care connections • Free "Jump start" program for cars at park & ride lots • Vanpools (less cost to riders, free to drivers, plus driver receives personal use of vehicle) • Frequent rider programs (one ride free for each week traveled, etc.) • On -site (at the business location) programs such as transit competitions, give -aways (t- shirts, windshield ice /snow scrapers, letter openers, etc.), commuter fairs, etc. • Coffee, juice, snacks on vehicles 12 OPERATING AND CAPITAL COST ESTIMATES SERVICE CONCEPT SCENARIO The service concept scenario, upon which the operating costs contained in this estimate are based, is as follows: • 9 new bus routes would operate in and near the I -494 corridor - 4 routes would operate in the north/south section of the corridor 5 routes would operate in the east/west section of the corridor • Hub -to -Hub express services would operate during peak hours only (6 a.m. — 9 a.m., 3:30 p.m. — 6:30 p.m., Monday through Friday) • Limited Stop Hub -to -Hub services would operate during peak hours with limited midday service • Local Line Haul services, would operate weekdays all day (5:30 a.m. — 11:30 p.m., Monday through Friday), and on Saturdays (12 hours) and Sundays (10 hours) • Distributors would operate during the hours the Local Line Haul services are operating • 1 Hub -to -Hub express route, 2 Limited Stop Hub -to -Hub routes and 1 Local Line Haul route would operate in the north/south portion of the corridor • 1 Hub -to -Hub express route, 2 Limited Stop Hub -to -Hub routes and 2 Local Line Haul routes would operate in the east/west portion of the corridor • 15 Distributor systems would operate throughout the corridor, including small buses, existing radial bus services and employer shuttle vans • 4 routes would require 3 — 40 foot peak buses each, and five routes would require 4 — 40 foot peak buses each • Distributor systems would assume 2 small buses each (in practice some may require more, some may require none) • Peak hour only large bus operating cost is based on $150 per revenue hour • All day large bus operating cost is based on $115 per revenue hour • Small bus operating cost is based on $70 per revenue hour OPERATING COST ESTIMATE With these assumptions, the service scenario operations cost estimate is determined as follows: 4 peak hour routes X 3 vehicles per route = 12 vehicles 2 peak hour routes X 4 vehicles per route = 8 vehicles 20 peak hr. buses X 6 hrs. per day operation = 120 peak hours per day 120 peak hrs. per day X $150.00/hour = $18,000 per day 3 all day routes X 4 peak hour vehicles per route = 12 vehicles 3 all day routes X 2 non -peak vehicles per route = 6 vehicles 12 vehicles X 6 peak hrs. per weekday = 72 peak hours per weekday 6 vehicles X 12 non -peak hrs. per weekday = 72 non -peak hours per weekday 144 all day hours per day X $115.00/hr. = $16,560 per weekday 4 limited off peak routes per day X 1 vehicle per route = 4 vehicles 13 A 4 vehicles X 4 non -peak hours per day =.16 off -peak hours per day 16 off -peak hours per day X $115.00/hr. _ $1,840.00 per day 3 weekend routes X 2 vehicles per route = 6 vehicles 6 vehicles X 22 weekend hours = 132 weekend hours 132 weekend hours X $115.00/hr. _ $15,180.00 per weekend 15 distributor systems X 2 small vehicles per system = 30 vehicles 30 vehicles X 18 hrs. per weekday = 540 hrs. per weekday 540 hrs. per weekday X $70 per hour = $37,800.00 per weekday No distributor vehicles on weekends Weekday costs: Peak hour buses - All day buses - Limited off peak buses - Distributor buses - Total cost per weekday - Weekend costs: Weekend service - Total cost per weekend - Weekly costs: Total weekday cost X 5 = Total weekend cost - Total weekly cost - Annual costs: Total weekly cost X 52 = VEHICLE CAPITAL COSTS Peak hour vehicle needs: $18,000.00 per weekday $16,560.00 per weekday $ 1,840.00 per weekday $37.800.00 per weekday $74,200.00 per weekday $15.180.00 per weekend $15,180.00 per weekend $371,000.00 per week $ 15.180.00 per week $386,180.00 per week $20,081,360.00 per year 32.— 40 foot buses X $290,000 each = $ 9,280,000.00 - 40 foot vehicle capital cost 30 small vehicles X $70,000 each =$ 2.100.000.00 - small vehicle capital cost Total initial vehicle capital cost - $11,380,000.00 14 494 FACILITIES CAPITAL COSTS FACILITY: AVERAGE UNIT COST Bus — only Shoulder Lanes $70,000/ Lane Mile (No widening needed) Bus — only Shoulder Lanes $up to 280,000/ Lane Mile (widening or relocation required) *Cost estimates include major work items and relocations, but do not include any bridge modifications to improve bottlenecks or utility relocations (such as fiber optic). Cost estimates are given in 1999 dollars and are preliminary. The costs given are for a freeway design. Busways along parallel arterials $(to be determined) Transit Centers $2 Million each plus right of way Park & Rides (surface) $2,000 per space plus right of way Park & Rides (structure) $10,000 per space plus right of way Transfer Facilities $25,000 per facility Ramp Meter Bypasses $0.3 to 0.5 Million each Redesign 82 °d St. Station $20 million t Given the network of existing and likely -to -be -built transit hubs along the I -494 corridor, it is clear that the most significant gap exists between the Mall of America in East Bloomington and Southwest Station in Eden Prairie. The preliminary facilities list identifies several possible locations for transit hubs. It is most probable that of these locations, only one would be built as a major transit hub on the scale of Southwest Station or Mall of America. Due to the pattern of intersecting roadways and its location near the midpoint between Southwest Station and Mall of America, the most attractive location for this major hub is at the 82"d Street/I -35W transit station. The current plan for this station, to be constructed as part of the I -35W transit corridor improvement program, calls for a station to be wedged into excess City of Bloomington and MnDOT right -of -way adjacent to I -35W, north of 82 "d Street. This site poses major challenges for the operation of both I -35W and I -494 corridor services as currently envisioned, due to its distance from I -494 and difficult access to and from I -35W. This suggests that the currently planned facility will not function in a way that significantly improves transit performance in either corridor. It may be appropriate, then, to supercede the current 82 "d Street project with a major investment along the I -35W right -of -way. One potential design would configure the future 79'/80'" Street bridge over I -35W to provide direct transfer capabilities between local services (on the bridge) and express services either via a station in the median of I -35W or ramps directly from the HOV lanes to an at -grade crossing on the bridge. Such a station could easily cost $20 million or more, which suggests that it is feasible only within the confines of the projected reconstruction of the I -35W/I -494 junction, currently estimated at $115 to $150 million. 15 afraid T do not P-noLo your Part rs name or even i-� o w were work -t n w i -F-h one, dear Off r'cer Nt arks, that d I-P 5o, please sh c e +h (s message Tk an "qi vi n9 is b wl- a 1'2eW days a WILY a n d vw than ks w rF-h, h i rn, /h,er) and T co WcLm , t lei ike- o Your k indne6s that day toward rn ccusrorc pass da,u.gh�-ers, Jcr�1 Lfa yr) a.nd �nic CI$ months Without eY preSSc.n3 n�e.y heart Fe,Lt thanks naw) i5 v'er rniech r apP e�i area( a e. r s -Fh e, -ta you.. ' I1il y -Earn ! y has rn u CA to ce l ` 1 m j,G co rmpass i'o ru and co n cer3n, you. s h areol -Po' -khi s Thati ks q vm3 . T t was 67i )o rrvn �h s M41 -Farn Ly a t our ho m e, cznd la.+�►- ,;1, o - aDmorrow Cray 2 3) wh e,n I c vpen e.nced the hoses ta.L. God has a.Lways been My Card, a.e ct rrest' anol Vol_ responoled PreSeAl rti my li'fe, bu.t nca,Cr more so tl�►a.n on. -Hirt morn a- He pLaced yo��, ` -� o the q 11 C aU, . T 12no w that �' arr�, o n, rn w path that dad . ke re, today , i rti Lar9 .e, part, d u.e to Ae eYy day T- ruuize how +ru,! y rode you. Planed . Your c'u,Lcle respornse bLacoed Z am -ta be, here e ell ebrwhn5 a-nd actiom ce�rtcunly he.Ipe-cl save my -r'hanles iyrn wt+-h my -Para i!y and Lool�n9 I fe - T am 5o tha.rkfu,', -For +� e de.P'br�. lcc a forwo rd W i n antier P h� a -oty -ta the up co rri ► n 9 I h o u,r . s u,acl car c n d o u.r � ra,tn , n . lT'n�, ho la'd O16 W t t-h My girls arA m y Kvs b an d- wha-l- y q' y 9 wonder:A I m, -mnri L5 We. Wt U creafC, Ea<,h oi,ay as most dc,��t-ry a. gift! i4•i thous k -Os s tharik yo u. i s I o ng o vend uc, 116 most czrtudnly . When w&s�i down to Tha+'►ksg�vM3 vUnner we w"I be Coven n9 your pre nce that day am en9 ou.r co u.n kk65 b I,t�S ►n9s . p y 7hu.nk63i vj rnr ! • L.xuj eo. Pedersen, 5 9 2! WoJ nut- 0 r. I ( MUNICIPAL League of Minnesota Cities Building LL^V11I,JL.t�T V 1. 145 University Avenue West, Suite 450 MI COMMISSION St. Paul, Minnesota 55103 Telephone: (651) 228 -9757 Facsimile: (651) 228 -9787 UPDATE 1999 -7 TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 30, 1999 MLC CITY ELECTIONS As discussed in the October MLC Update, four MLC cities held elections on Tuesday, November 2. Results of the elections are as follows: In Bloomington, Councilmember Gene Winstead prevailed handily over his opponent, Frank Lindholm to become Bloomington's new mayor. Mike Fossum bested Steve Mahowald to fill the council seat vacated by Mayor -Elect Winstead. In Bloomington Council District I, Steve Peterson prevailed over Diane Pahl Bump to replace Tom Spies, and in District II, Heather. Harden beat Joe Campo to replace Peggy Ramthun. In Maplewood, Robert Cardinal defeated Councilmember Mary Koppen in a tight mayoral race to replace Mayor George Rossbach. Councilmember Koppen will retain his council seat. Julie Wasiluk and Ken Collins were elected to fill two council seats. John Kysylyczyn ( "John K ") prevailed in Roseville's mayoral election, a three -way race that received a great deal of attention. The two candidates he bested were Councilmember Barb Mastel, who will retain her council seat, and write -in candidate Katie Harms. I Councilmember Dean Maschka prevailed over Greg Thordson in his re- election bid. Finally, in Minnetonka, councilmembers Dick Allendorf, Linda Koblick, Ken Tauer and AI Thomas were all re- elected easily to their council seats as there were no challengers. Congratulations to newly elected and re- elected city officials! Mr. Schreiber's knowledge, experience and legislative contacts will be an asset to both Messerli & Kramer and the MLC. The MLC Update is prepared by Robert G. Renner, Jr. and Jennifer J. Peterson Messerll d Kramer P.A., 145 University Avenue West Suite 450, SL Paul, MN 55103 Telephone (851) 228-9757 Fax (851) 228 -9787 Member Cities: Apple Valley, Bloomington, Burnsville, Eagan, Eden Prairie, Edina, Lakeville, Maplewood, Minnetonka, Plymouth, Roseville, Shoreview, Woodbury r MESSERLI & KRAMER HIRES DISTINGUISHED LOBBYIST Bill Schreiber recently joined Messerli & Kramer's lobbying team. Mr. Schreiber brings to the firm many years of public policy experience, particularly with local government issues, tax policies, and regional government concerns. Mr. Schreiber served as a member of the Metropolitan Council from District 2 and as Director of the Office of Intergovernmental Policy for the Minnesota Department of Transportation from 1993 to 1999. He also served as a minority leader in the House of Representatives, Chair of the House Fiscal Disparities Task Force and Chair of the House Tax Committee at various times during his 19 years in the Minnesota Legislature. Mr. Schreiber was also .a Brooklyn Park city councilmember from 1968 until his election to the House in 1972. MLC BREAKFASTS APPROACHING The MLC 1999 Regional Breakfasts have been scheduled. The dates and locations are: Region 1 (cities of Bloomington, Eden Prairie, Edina, Minnetonka & Plymouth) — Tuesday, December 7 at the Radisson Hotel and Conference Center in Plymouth. Region 2 (Maplewood, Roseville, Shoreview & Woodbury) — Thursday, December 9 at the Maplewood Inn in Maplewood. Region 3 (Apple Valley, Burnsville, Eagan & Lakeville) — Wednesday, December 15 at Royal Cliff Conference Center in Eagan. All meetings will be held from 7:30 a.m. — 9:15 a.m. If you have not yet done so, please RSVP to Liz Shields by telephone at 651/228 -9757 or by e-mail at eshields @mandklaw.com. These breakfasts have been both enjoyable and informative in the past and we hope everyone will attend. 2000 MLC LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM The MLC Board of Directors approved its 2000 Legislative Program at its October 20 meeting in Eden Prairie. The entire program will be presented at the regional breakfasts in December, but here are some highlights: (1) Property Tax Reform — The MLC will continue its policy of support for additional reduction in the property tax rate for homes valued over $76,000 from the payable 2000 classification rate of 1.65 percent to 1.5 percent. The MLC believes this reduction is necessary to reduce the disparity between the Metropolitan Area and Greater Minnesota regarding the percent of income earned that is expended on property taxes. 4 1 (2) Tax Increment Financing — The MLC believes that the legislature should continue to help cities overcome financial shortfalls that are occurring in TIF districts due to commercial - industrial property tax rate compression. Additionally, the MLC is opposed to any additional legislative restrictions on the use of TIF by local units of government. Finally, the MLC would support a change in TIF laws that would allow cities to use TIF for the creation of affordable housing. (3) Property Tax Restrictions — The MLC continues to oppose any extension of levy limits or a freeze on property taxes. Both policies restrict the ability of locally elected officials to make fiscally responsible decisions that are appropriate for their cities. (4) Limited Market Value — Once again, the MLC will work to defeat the imposition a property tax policy that artificially restricts the growth in market value of residential property. The ' MLC is opposed because further limiting market value growth will create inequities in the property tax system and will stifle the ability of local governments to provide the additional services needed as their communities grow. (5) The MLC will closely monitor any legislative action regading fiscal disparities, local government aids, transportation funding, and tax -base sharing. 2000 CAPITAL BUDGET The 2000 Session is a bonding year during which the Legislature will pass a capital budget for the 2000 fiscal year. Minnesota typically adopts capital budgets in the legislative sessions of even - numbered calendar years (alternating with the biennial operating budget adopted in odd - numbered calendar years). The capital budget provides recommendations for capital expenditures not financed in regular state agency operating budgets. Items funded include: • acquisition of land • construction and repair of state agency, college, and university buildings • construction and repair of state prison, hospital, and nursing home facilities • construction and repair of dams and flood control structures 3 construction and repair of recreational facilities like state trails, interpretive centers and campground facilities, roads, bridges, and parking lots in state parks, forests, wildlife management areas, and the Minnesota Zoo grants to local government units for construction of capital projects Capital budgets are typically funded through the issuance of state general obligation bonds. The state constitution limits the term of these bonds to twenty years. Principal and interest costs of the bonds are included in the state's general fund operating budget. The Department of Finance issued instructions for the 2000 legislative session capital budget in April 1999. Preliminary submissions of capital budget requests for state agencies were due to the Department of Finance in June 1999 with final submissions due in October 1999. Preliminary submissions from local governments were due September 15, 1999, with final submissions due on November 1. The Governor's capital budget proposals to the Legislature will be released, in January 2000, and the Legislature is expected to adopt capital budget appropriations in April 2000. Currently, requests totaling approximately $1.5 billion have been submitted to the Department for consideration. Here are some highlights of the requests submitted so far: 1. The University of Minnesota system has requested $132.2 million for building or improving facilities on the Minneapolis, Duluth, Morris and Crookston campuses. 2. The Minnesota State College and University System has requested $230 million for building renovation and construction. 3. The Metropolitan Council has requested $70 million for transit projects, $20 million of which is for bus garages and $50 million is for transitways. 4. Various requests have been made by political subdivisions, including $1.5 million for the Gibbs Farm Museum, $15 million for the Duluth Sports and Recreation Center and $7 million for the Minneapolis Parks and Trails system. The South Metro Public Safety Training Facility has requested $3.1 million in bonding, and the Northwest Public Safety Training Center has requested bonding in the amount of $3.22 million. When the Governor's recommendations are available (likely in January) we will provide you with a more complete summary. (Source: Minnesota Department of Finance.) 4 l /A✓ �� .�•�� ten- . G� b�� November 16, 1999 November 16, 1999 Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Council Members: We are writing in regard to the Grandview redevelopment, and specifically, the impact it will have on TAGS Gymnastics. Our daughter has attended Tags twice weekly for a year and a half. There are many options out there for gymnastics instruction. We chose TAGS in large part because it is located in our community and we prefer to patronize area businesses. Over the last year and a half, we have discovered what a tremendous asset TAGS is to our neighborhood and the city of Edina. We know many families within Edina who have selected TAGS because of it's convenient neighborhood location. TAGS provides valuable instruction to so many of the children in our community. One need only visit on any weeknight to see the laughter and obvious enjoyment of learning —it is truly a pleasure to see! We urge the City Council to thoughtfully consider keeping this business in Edina. Please keep the needs of the children in mind as decisions are made regarding relocation. If this business were to move out of Edina, it would be a tremendous loss for all of us. Having a quality, reputable gymnastics school like TAGs in our neighborhood enhances our quality of life, and provides our families with a won- derful, close -by activity for our kids. We are certain our feelings echo those of many other parents who, for whatever reason, will not write to you. We hope you carefully consider keeping this posi- tive place part of our community. Thank you. Sincerely, Zachary & Pauline Marell 5501 Countryside Road, Edina, MN 55436 (612) 915 -1033 cc: Julia & Greg Aretz, TAGS owners November 17, 1999 Dr. William McGuire CEO,UnitedHealth Group 9900Bren Road East Suite 300 Minnetonka,MN 55343 Re: Proposed Use of UHG Property at Lincoln Dr and Londonderry Dear Dr. McGuire, We are your neighbors of your company headquarters, the Opus Tower in Minnetonka, and of your Edina Complex on Lincoln Drive, and.we, .as you, care about our neighborhood. We live in the Londonderry Townhomes. We.write this letter to you because.we have been made aware that the property owned by UnitedHealth Group at the corner of Lincoln Drive and Londonderry Road has been proposed to be sold to the Haugland Company for use as a "stripmall ". We are certain that you have experienced the same frustration as.we have in trying to leave this intersection - going North, South, East or West - it is a challenge at any time of day. In Edina, as elsewhere, open spaces are precious and few. With all of the press surrounding the Health Care industry lately, positive and negative,,wouldn't just a little more positive thinking and press be great! Please.wouldn't you consider taking this land and making it a park or perhaps just leaving.it wild? How beautiful it,would -look to your offices and the-community, dedicated to the millions of people that UnitedHealth Group serves,right here in the view of your headquarters. Please do not let this proposed decision stand as is. The deadline is approaching: December 1, 1999. We are long -term residents of Edina and had hoped that the community.would never succumb to revenue over the beauty of our city. We ask that you share this ideal. - Thank you for taking the time to read our letter and to consider .what,we say. Most S'ncer ly Yours Y , J Harr and Pa d year 5705 Duncan Lane Edina, MN 55436 cc: Edina Planning Commission Edina City Council Star Tribune ,coo/ 7h& &10 1l Middle School December 3, 1999 Dear Gordon Hughs, Lisa Olson, Susan Heiberg, and City Hall Staff, I'm writing on behalf of the Edina Schools Crisis Intervention Team to convey our deepest thanks for the compassionate decision you made to open city hall following the death of Nathan Alt several weeks ago. We have had a Crisis Intervention Team in the Edina Schools for over 10 years and have responded to numerous similar situations as were faced with Nathan's each. erhwith well - articulated response plan, which has worked effectively over each incident we have found that there are variables which we could have neither foreseen nor planned for. The meeting of high school students at Perkins was just such a variable. As you can imagine, ,there is plentq I. to do ati,the school site and throughout the district on the day students .discover a death'has occurred. Dealing with a group of students out of the building has not be4n a part a %he plan in the past. When we found that a group had gathered at Perkins; Todd Olson' from the highschool volunteerdshad been communicate epherded to those kids. It was such a pleasure and relief to know that the city hall and given a. place to share their grief. I'm not sure how that occurred but for whatever part you all played in this happening; the members of the Crisis Team wish to express our most sincere thanks. When they say it takes a village to raise a child, it's just this type of caring guidance that serves as shining example of members of the village stepping up to the plate. Thank you so much for having a profound influence in the lives of many kids on that day. Sincerely, Paul Andress School Counselor — South View Middle School Crisis Steering Committee Member — Edina Schools Cc: Members of the Crisis Steering "Committee Todd Olson - Edma High Schdol .:Dennis Maetzold 1Vlayc7r ofE "dina . ' Ken Dragseth Superintendent of Schools „ LLOYD V. LO FG REN 7405 N ���� M MN N 5 55439 39 EDINA, A �Al- 'oa � ej let °1 S! 3 s a* 7 1 r acy a l U 'T D1GE1S NOVEMBER, 1999 A digest of actions taken by the Metropolitan Council, Metropolitan Airports Commission, Metropolitan Parks & Open Space Commission and Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission. Minutes of all Council and Commission meetings are filed with the Legislative Reference Library, 645 State Office Building, 6th Floor, in St. Paul for a period of up to two years and can be viewed by the public. Call the appropriate commission or operations area for meeting information and /or specific questions. Metropolitan Council The Metropolitan Council is located at Mears Park Centre, 230 E. Fifth St., St. Paul, MN, 55101. For further information regarding the contents of this publication, contact Sandra Lindstrom at (651) 602 -1390. The Council's general number is (651) 602 -1000, TDD: (651) 291 -0904. Call the Metro / nformation Line at (651) 602 -1888 for recorded information about upcoming Council meetings and regional events, current job openings and Section 8 housing information. Recent Council publications' c - an be found at major public libraries in the Metro Area. Publications can be ordered by e-mail. The address is: data.center@etc.state.mn.us Comments can be made to that address as well as (651) 602 -1500, the Metro Council Public Comment Line. Check the internet web site at hup://www.metrocouncil org. The Council... F.nviranment approved the appointment of five Council members for direct participation in three highly public environmental projects. The level of involvement shall be as necessary to understand and provide input to staff on related public and policy issues, and communicate the project issues to the full committee. Their role is as liaison and may include becoming voting members on evaluation committees.. authorized its Regional Administrator to award and execute a contract with the lowest, I responsive bidder, Polydyne, Inc. for providing centrifuge polymer at Seneca Wasetwater Treatment Plant at a unit price of $0.70 per pound. amended the 1999 MCES Capital Budget by increasing the authorization for Project 980200 by $1,100,000 and decreasing the authorization for Project 910200 by $1,100,000; and authorized its Regional Administrator to award and execute a contract for the Blue Lake Groundwater Relief Project, MCES Project 980200, to Barbarossa and Sons, Inc., 11000 - 93rd Avenue N., Osseo, Minnesota, for their low bid of $3,790,270, with this award contingent on Minnesota Pollution Control Agency issuance of the NPDES Permit. Livable Communities awarded $635,000 in LCA -Local Housing Incentive Account (LHIA) grants to four cities -- Chanhassen, Mendota Heights, Ramsey and Shakopee -- to support multifamily rental housing production efforts. authorized the Metro HRA to project -base up to 15 percent of its Section 8 allocation and establish categorical use limitations. • approved for public comment a draft of local preferences for the selection of households to be assisted in the Metro HRA Section 8 project -based assistance program. adopted the proposed Inclusionary Housing Account (IHA) Criteria for inclusion in the Metropolitan Housing Implementation Fund funding application guide for both rental and ownership housing. The criteria will be used in addition to the Project Selection process. • Awarded a Livable Communities Act Inclusionary Housing. Account grant in the amount of $348,054 and made a Housing Assistance Loan Program loan of $348,054 to the City of Chanhassen to support the Lake Susan Apartment Homes rental housing proposal. Management approved the Public Hearing Draft of the 2000 Unified Operating Budget for review and discussion at the Public Hearing on December 8, 1999. • approved the Public Hearing Draft of the 2000 -2005 Capital Improvement Program and the 2000 Capital Improvement Budget for review and discussion at the Public Hearing on December 8, 1999. accepted the Minnesota State Auditor's Management and Compliance Report for the Metropolitan Council for the year ended December 31, 1998, which was presented to, and accepted by, the Audit Committee on September 15, 1999. accepted the 1998 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. • approved the list of authorized financial institutions as presented. • amended the 1999 Unified Operating Budget as presented. Parks adopted the Final Statement of findings and conclusions included in the hearing report and directed staff to make the revisions recommended therein and shown in the 2000 -2005 Metropolitan Regional Parks Capital Improvement Program; and approved a resolution adopting the 2000- 2005 Metropolitan Regional Parks Capital Improvement Program, as revised in the Final Statement, as an amendment to the Recreation Open Space Development Guide/Policy Plan. Regional Growth Policy • reviewed and adopted the Nininger Township Critical Area Plan with the following recommendations: that the Department of Natural Resources find the Nininger Township Comprehensive Plan and Critical Area Plan amendments consistent with Critical Area Standards and Guidelines in Executive Order 79 -19 and with regional policies and systems plans for the designated Critical area; 2. that findings of plan consistency with the MNRRA Comprehensive Management Plan be communicated to the National Park Service - MNRRA; 3. that Nininger Township be commended for its commitment to preserving and using their river corridor lands and waters for their open, scenic and natural characteristics and encourage the Page 2 November, 1999 Il DiEi�ST Criteria for rental and ownership • approved continuation of the Information developments which are used by the Services incentive program, including Metropolitan Housing Implementation accelerated salary administration, retention Group to screen all multifamily and awards and hiring incentives for difficult to homeownership housing applications retain and attract IS employees. received through the Super RFP solicitation process. • Awarded a Livable Communities Act Inclusionary Housing. Account grant in the amount of $348,054 and made a Housing Assistance Loan Program loan of $348,054 to the City of Chanhassen to support the Lake Susan Apartment Homes rental housing proposal. Management approved the Public Hearing Draft of the 2000 Unified Operating Budget for review and discussion at the Public Hearing on December 8, 1999. • approved the Public Hearing Draft of the 2000 -2005 Capital Improvement Program and the 2000 Capital Improvement Budget for review and discussion at the Public Hearing on December 8, 1999. accepted the Minnesota State Auditor's Management and Compliance Report for the Metropolitan Council for the year ended December 31, 1998, which was presented to, and accepted by, the Audit Committee on September 15, 1999. accepted the 1998 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. • approved the list of authorized financial institutions as presented. • amended the 1999 Unified Operating Budget as presented. Parks adopted the Final Statement of findings and conclusions included in the hearing report and directed staff to make the revisions recommended therein and shown in the 2000 -2005 Metropolitan Regional Parks Capital Improvement Program; and approved a resolution adopting the 2000- 2005 Metropolitan Regional Parks Capital Improvement Program, as revised in the Final Statement, as an amendment to the Recreation Open Space Development Guide/Policy Plan. Regional Growth Policy • reviewed and adopted the Nininger Township Critical Area Plan with the following recommendations: that the Department of Natural Resources find the Nininger Township Comprehensive Plan and Critical Area Plan amendments consistent with Critical Area Standards and Guidelines in Executive Order 79 -19 and with regional policies and systems plans for the designated Critical area; 2. that findings of plan consistency with the MNRRA Comprehensive Management Plan be communicated to the National Park Service - MNRRA; 3. that Nininger Township be commended for its commitment to preserving and using their river corridor lands and waters for their open, scenic and natural characteristics and encourage the Page 2 November, 1999 Il __I M 17T'R�O DlEiEr` 5,__)'T_ township to continue working with Dakota County on regional trail connections within the corridor; 4. that Nininger Township be encouraged to include provisions in ordinances to guide what development, if any, would be allowed on nonconforming lots of less than 2.5 acres in Sections 13 and 18; and 5. that Nininger Township be encouraged to pursue implementation of a potential trail spur from the proposed regional trail to the historic Town Hall. reviewed and adopted the Mendota Heights Comprehensive Plan Amendment with the following recommendations: 1. that the City of Mendota Heights may place its plan amendment into effect with the following conditions: ➢ That notification of aircraft noise impact be provided with sales /marketing materials presented to prospective buyers and that filing of notice against the deeds be included as part of the closing process /agreement; ➢ That the townhome structures within the project be designed to provide acoustic protection (in both noise zone 3 and 4) to residents, thereby preventing sleep and speech interference; and ➢ That the overall project design provide limited exterior uses. 2. that the Metropolitan Council prepare an issue paper on notification issues concerning aircraft noise as part of the Page 3 year 2000 Aviation Policy Plan update. • reviewed and approved the Prior Lake Comprehensive Plan Update with the following recommendations: 1. that the City of Prior Lake may place its 2020 Comprehensive Plan into effect with no plan modifications; 2. that the plan meets all of the Metropolitan Land Planning Act requirements for 1998 plan updates; and that an undesignated MUSA reserve of 1,937 acres (net) be approved for the city, which it can apply within areas identified in the comprehensive plan. Such approval is subject to the conditions set forth in the Local Planning Handbook and requires annual reporting by the city of its use of the MUSA reserve including name, type, location (map) and net density of the projects approved for MUSA. authorized the Acting Director of the Community Development Division to grant local units of government until June 30, 2000, to complete their comprehensive plan revisions, provided the local unit of government submits reasons for the need for an extension and establishes a time certain for plan submission; and directed staff to develop an alignment policy consistent with the concept of making regional decisions contingent upon submission of a comprehensive plan in conformity with Council system plans and consistent with the Regional Blueprint. Transportation authorized its Regional Administrator to enter into a joint powers agreement with the Minnesota Department of Transportation for November, 1999 the construction of the I -35W & 82nd Street station. authorized its Regional Administrator to negotiate and execute a cost sharing agreement with the City of Cottage Grove for South Washington County Plant Access Road Improvements, with an estimated cost to the Council of $1,080,000 to be adjusted based on actual costs. amended the Transportation Division element of the Council's Capital Program (projected multi -year capital authorizations) by $28,292,638 from $298,410,410 to $326,703,048 as presented; and reallocated Regional Transit Bonds funds as presented. . • authorized its Regional Administrator to adjust the following appropriations, execute the necessary contracts, and amend the adopted 1999 Capital Improvement Program for the following projects: 1. to reduce Regional Capital Transit funding to MVTA for rebuilding six small buses due to receipt of federal funds for this purpose;_ 2. to reallocate these funds as the local match for two new projects which received federal funds; and 3. to use unneeded bus lift maintenance money for the installation of fiber optic cables at the Yankee Doodle Park and Ride which is currently under construction. authorized its Regional Administrator to execute a Regional Transit Capital Grant in the amount of $350,000 from existing approved capital funds, for the purposes of major vehicle component replacement for the 23 regional fleet buses operated by Laidlaw Transit Services, Inc. under D I ESS', T contract with the Metropolitan Council. • authorized its Regional Administrator to adjust the following appropriations, execute the necessary contracts, and amended the adopted 1999 Capital Improvement Program for the following Projects: 1. to authorize funding changes to facilitate the purchase of 10 Gillig 40- foot buses by Southwest Metro Transit to allow them to competitively procure bus operation services; 2. to authorize contract changes to fund Certificate of Participation in anticipation of the currently authorized purchase of the Southwest Metro Bus Garage; and 3. to fund the small cost overrun at the Southwest Transit Hub. authorized its Regional Administrator to negotiate and execute a contract with Uniforms Unlimited to provide driver uniforms and related services for a five -year period in an amount not to exceed $3,360,000. • incorporated the County Highway 42 and Trunk Highway 242 /County State Aid Highway 14 Corridor Study recommendations into its next Transportation Policy Plan to consider them in establishing priorities for highway and transit improvements; required the counties and cities to incorporate the goals, objectives and recommendations of the corridor studies into their comprehensive plans; reaffirmed the functional classification of County Highway 42 and Trunk Highway 242 /County State Aid Highway 14 as non - freeway principal arterials, assuming local and county support of the recommended corridor plans; and Page 4 November, 1999 o- evaluated the need for designating a new east -west principal arterial through central Dakota and Scott Counties in its next Transportation Policy Plan. • approved the appointment of eight individuals to the Transportation Accessibility Advisory Committee. adopted the proposed transit service plan for purposes of soliciting public input and approve public hearings to be held in February, 2000. The hearings would outline the proposed Sectors 1 and 2 changes for 31 cities in Anoka, Hennepin, Ramsey and Washington Counties. authorized its Regional Administrator to negotiate and execute transit assistance agreements with the following transit service providers, not to exceed the amounts listed. The agreements shall be effective for the period January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2000. Small Urban $573,174 Rural $1,578,565 ADA County Service $2,461,816 Regular -Route Service $1,117,164 Replacement (Opt -Out) Service $3,926,476 Private Vehicle Capital $494,694 The Council Also: • made two appointments to the Board of directors of the Family Housing Fund. • adopted a resolution recognizing the contributions of Brian Lamb New Publications Council publications are available from the Council's Regional Data Center. For a free and complete list of publications, write the Metropolitan Council Data Center, 230 E. Fifth St., St. Paul, MN 55101, or call (651) 602 -1140. E -mail address is: data. center @metc.state.mn.us There is a charge for some publications. The bimonthly Council Directions newsletter provides information on regional issues and Council Programs. If you wish to subscribe to Council Directions at no charge, call Dawn Hoffner at (651) 602 -1447. Metropolitan Commission Activities Metropolitan Airports Commission Metropolitan Airports Commission offices are located at 6040 28th Av. S., Minneapolis, MN 55450. For more information, call Lynn Sorensen at (612) 726 -8186. The Commission: held a public hearing on November 1 to receive public comment on the environmental assessments of the Commission's 2000 -2006 Capital Improvement Program. Page 5 adopted a resolution reaffirming the Commission's preference for construction of the airport stations and tunnel of the proposed Light Rail Transit project using the Design- Bid -Build approach in order to minimize risks to airport operations due to construction of the tunnel /stations under two runways, taxiways, aprons, the Lindbergh Terminal and parking structures. The resolution also stated the need to ensure close coordination with implementation of the many projects in the MSP 2010 (Airport November, 1999 Expansion) Plan. approved the purchase of 15 automated external defibrillators to be used by the Crash/Fire/Rescue Department. authorized staff to issue a request for proposal to secure bid packages for operators of food, beverage and retail concessions at the Minneapolis -St. Paul International Airport. Metropolitan Parks & Open Space Commission (MP &OSC) Metropolitan Parks & Open Space Commission offices are located at Mears Park Centre, 230 E. Fifth St., St. Paul, 55101. For more information, call Ellie Bailey at (651) 602 -1312. The Commission: recommended that the Council adopt the Final Statement of findings and conclusions shown in the 2000 -2005 Metropolitan Regional Parks Capital Improvement Program as outlined on Page 2 of this publication. DI(iES"T Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission (MSFQ Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission offices are located at 900 South 5th St., Minneapolis, MN 55415. For more information, call Nancy Matowitz at (612) 335 -3310. The Commission: • authorized the Executive Director and Finance Director, in consultation with Jeff Isenberg of Risk Management, to initiate and carry out the process for propertyinsurance renewal. • approved the purchase of the basketball scoreboard from Daktronics in the amount of $65,000 plus applicable sales tax. • approved the purchase of the Kingdome's 1996 grasshopper in the amount of $32,250. • rejected the proposal submitted by Ceres for snow removal and will proceed to work out remaining details • rejected the bids received on November 15, 1999, for the 1999 Point of Sales Project and authorized new bids for this project. Page 6 November, 1999 FREEWAY NOISE MITIGATION STUDY EDINA, MINNESOTA PREPARED FOR CITY OF EDINA PREPARED BY SRF CONSULTING GROUP, INC. DECEMBER 1999 SRF No. 0983254 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. 1.0 Executive Summary ............................................................. ............................... 1 1.1 Survey of Residents ................................................. ............................... 1 1.2 Types of Barriers ...................................................... ............................... 1 1.3 Feasibility of Noise Barriers .................................... ............................... 2 1.4 Funding Sources ....................................................... ............................... 2 1.5 Conclusions and Recommendations ........................ ............................... 3 2.0 Purpose of Study ..................................................................: ............................... 4 3.0 Study Process ....................................................................... ............................... 6 3.1 Survey of Residents .................................................. ............................... 6 3.2 Neighborhood Committees ....................................... ............................... 9 4.0 Traffic Noise ....................................................................... ............................... 11 4.1 What Causes Traffic Noise? ..................................... ............................... 11 4.2 How Is Noise Measured? .......................................... ............................... 11 4.3 What Are the State Noise Standards? ....................... ............................... 12 4.4 What Are Existing Noise Levels? ............................. ............................... 12 5.0 Types of Barriers ................................................................... ............................... 12 5.1 Noise Walls ............................................................... ............................... 12 5.2 Fences ....................................................................... ............................... 16 5.3 Berms ....................................................................... ............................... 19 5.4 Landscaping .............................................................. ............................... 19 6.0 Feasibility Assessment .......................................................... ............................... 19 6.1 Existing Noise Barriers ............................................. ............................... 19 6.2 Proposed Berms ........................................................ ............................... 24 6.3 Proposed Noise Walls and/or Fencing ...................... ............................... 24 6.4 Typical Cross - Sections ............................................. ............................... 25 7.0 Possible Funding Sources ..................................................... ............................... 25 7.1 Mn/DOT Projects ...................................................... ............................... 25 7.2 State and Federal Funding Sources ........................... ............................... 29 7.3 City Funding Sources ............................................... ............................... 29 7.4 Mn/DOT Community Roadside Landscaping ......... ............................... 30 Partnership Program 8.0 Conclusions and Recommendations ..................................... ............................... 30 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 — Corridor Locations ................................................... ............................... 5 Figure 2 — Loudness by Time of Day ........................................ ............................... 7 Figure 3 — Importance of Issues ................................................ ............................... 8 Figure 4 — Willingness to Pay ................................................... ............................... 10 Figure 5 — Noise Level Comparisons ........................................ ............................... 13 Figure 6 — Examples of Noise Walls ......................................... ............................... 14 Figure 7 — Typical Sections for Noise Walls, Fences and Jersey Barriers ............... 15 Figure 8 — Examples of Fences ................................................. ............................... 17 Figure 9 — Space Requirements for Various Types of Berms ... ............................... 20 Figure 10 — Suggested Mitigation — TH 62 ................................. ............................... 21 Figure 11 — Suggested Mitigation — TH 169 ............................... ............................... 22 Figure 12 — Suggested Mitigation — TH 100 ............................... ............................... 23 Figure 13 — Typical Cross- Sections — TH 100 ............................ ............................... 26 Figure 14 — Typical Cross - Sections — TH 62 .............................. ............................... 27 Figure 15 — Typical Cross - Sections — TH 169 ............................ ............................... 28 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 — Noise Monitoring at Different Types of Fencing and Walls .................. 18 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A — Edina Noise Study Questionnaire Appendix B — MPCA "Rules of Thumb" Appendix C — Noise Wall Materials Comparison Matrix Appendix D — Noise Barrier Costs for Corridors Appendix E — Bibliography 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Edina City Council directed the preparation of a noise mitigation study along TH 62, TH 100 and TH 169 in the fall of 1998. The Freeway Noise Mitigation Study addresses the technical and financial feasibility of constructing noise walls, other forms of noise abatement and visual screening. Potential funding sources are evaluated, and conceptual designs are presented. The study was developed with ongoing involvement of the affected residential neighborhoods over a period of approximately one year. The results of the Edina Freeway Noise Mitigation Study will be used to seek funding and to negotiate with Mn/DOT for the provision of freeway noise abatement along existing highways. 1.1 SURVEY OF RESIDENTS Survey questionnaires were sent to 864 Edina residents living adjacent to or one house from TH 62, TH 100 and TH 169. Forty-nine (49) percent responded to the survey and 30 percent indicated they were interested in volunteering to serve on three neighborhood committees. Key findings of the survey are: • Respondents felt that freeway noise is approximately 4 on a scale of 5 with 0 being very quiet and 5 being very loud. • Respondents felt that safety, noise levels, views beyond their yards, aesthetics and cost were important factors to consider. Noise was given a slightly higher rating than other factors. • Respondents indicated that they would be willing to spend an average of approximately $260 per year for ten years for visual screening or noise barriers. Individual responses ranged from zero to $1,000 or more. Three series' of neighborhood meetings were held in February, April and November to discuss noise - related issues and develop recommendations for the City Council. 1.2 TYPES OF BARRIERS The Edina Freeway Noise Mitigation Study focuses on noise walls, berms, fencing and landscaping. Examples and cross - sections of each of these types of barriers are provided. Noise levels can be reduced if the line of sight is broken between the source of the noise and the receptor of the noise. To be effective, noise mitigation generally requires high material mass and an unbroken barrier. Mn/DOT has established standards for noise walls that ensure a minimum 5- decibel noise reduction. An 8- foot -high noise wall will cost approximately $15 per square foot ($120 per linear foot). Berms are a highly preferred form of noise mitigation, but require substantial land area. A 10- foot -high berm at a 3:1 slope (minimum for mowing) requires a width of approximately 70 feet. Therefore, berms cannot be provided along most areas of the three study corridors. Berms can cost $200 or more per linear foot if constructed as a separate project. However, Freeway Noise Mitigation Study Edina, Minnesota berms can often be constructed at low cost because construction projects often produce excess material that must be removed from the site and deposited elsewhere. Contractors can deposit this excess dirt in a proposed berm location at no extra cost to their project. While privacy fencing is typically not considered an effective means of noise mitigation, many residents on the neighborhood committees expressed an interest in using privacy fencing due to its lower cost and its appearance. A solid privacy fence costs approximately $10 per square foot for an 8 -foot high fence ($80 per linear foot). Noise monitoring was conducted at four locations in or near Edina to assess the effectiveness of privacy fencing compared to noise walls. Based on the monitoring results, the best performing visual barrier is located north of TH 62 east of Penn Avenue. This barrier, which is constructed of noise wall materials, achieved a 5 -6 decibel reduction in noise. Other fencing achieved noise reductions of 0 -3 decibels. For some people, visual barriers may reduce the perception of noise, although a significant noise decrease may not be measurable. Landscaping is not an effective means of noise reduction unless the landscaping is coniferous (evergreens), approximately 100 feet in depth, with branches down to the ground and planted very close together so there are no gaps. However, due to aesthetic and screening benefits, neighborhood committee participants highly favored landscaping as a part of any noise mitigation strategy. 1.3 FEASIBILITY OF NOISE BARRIERS Each freeway corridor (TH 62, TH 100 and TH 169) was evaluated for the potential for berms, noise walls and/or fencing. Consultant recommendations were reviewed with the neighborhood committees and revised to reflect neighborhood concerns and acceptability. Berms and landscaping are recommended wherever space is available, including areas where cul -de -sacs or frontage roads could be used as space for berming. Noise walls or fencing is recommended in all other locations except where not feasible (for example, bridges or cross - streets) or not desired by the neighborhood. 1.4 FUNDING SOURCES There are no federal or state funding sources specifically set aside for noise abatement. While Mn/DOT typically funds noise abatement as part of new construction or reconstruction projects, retrofit noise abatement is provided only for those sites identified as high priority areas in Mn/DOT's 1997 noise study. Only one of these high priority sites is located partially in Edina (east of TH 100, north of West 44th Street). Several potential funding sources are identified in the Freeway Noise Mitigation Study, but none of these sources has been used to date for retrofit freeway noise abatement. The City has worked with other metropolitan area communities to obtain state funding of noise mitigation through the State Legislature, but special state funding has not yet been authorized. City funding options include general revenues, bonding and special assessments. Opinions on special assessments for noise abatement or visual buffering are quite varied about survey respondents and neighborhood committee members. On the average, survey respondents Freeway Noise Mitigation Study 2 Edina, Minnesota indicated they would be willing to pay approximately $260 per year for ten years. An assessment of $260 per year for ten years would cover up to 25 percent of the cost for privacy fencing and somewhat mature landscaping on a typical residential lot. 1.5 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS People participating in the neighborhood committees generally felt that berms would be preferable where space allows, and privacy fencing would be helpful and acceptable if it is not financially feasible to construct noise walls. Most people also felt it was important to provide landscaping with all forms of barriers. The following strategies are recommended to provide some relief to the neighborhoods impacted by the freeways in the City: • Work with Mn/DOT on a cost - sharing basis to provide privacy fencing and landscaping as part of the TH 100 and TH 62 major maintenance projects that are currently scheduled. Mn/DOT has indicated a willingness to participate in 50 percent of the cost of privacy fencing (about $20 per linear foot) in these projects where the existing chain link fence is outside the clear zone and is scheduled for replacement as part of the maintenance project. Replacement of chain link fencing is planned for TH 62, but not TH 100. • Work aggressively with the Legislature to establish a state funding source for retrofit noise mitigation, privacy fencing and/or landscaping. • Determine an appropriate level of local funding for fencing and landscaping and leverage those funds to gain higher levels of state and federal participation in projects. • Identify demonstration projects that might fit the criteria for TEA -21 Enhancement, Livable Communities and Local Road Research Board funding and apply for grants. These funds have not yet been successfully used for noise abatement projects. • Establish policies and procedures that ensure excess fill materials from City projects are made available for use as noise berms wherever space is available. In addition, work with Mn/DOT, Hennepin County and private contractors to obtain excess fill for this purpose. • Work with private property owners to identify locations where excess fill could be placed on private property for noise mitigation purposes. • Participate in the Mn/DOT Community Roadside Landscaping Partnership Program to the greatest extent possible, providing supplemental funds so that more mature planting materials can be used. • Establish policies, procedures and design standards for the provision of fencing and landscaping in all residential areas along freeways. • Establish a local cost - sharing policy for fencing and landscaping. The following is suggested, but does not reflect current state or federal policies: — 50 percent state /federal funding — 25 percent City (general city funds) — 25 percent neighborhood (special assessments, private funds, in -kind contributions) • Involve neighborhoods in the final design of fencing and noise walls and in the selection of landscaping materials. Freeway Noise Mitigation Study Edina, Minnesota 2.0 PURPOSE OF STUDY Noise barriers are commonly provided in Minnesota as part of freeway construction or reconstruction if noise levels in sensitive areas (such as residential neighborhoods) exceed state noise standards and/or federal noise abatement criteria. However, the Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) has not traditionally constructed noise barriers along existing roadways unless the facility is undergoing major reconstruction. Large sections of the 14 miles of freeway in Edina are adjacent to residential neighborhoods that are not protected by noise walls or other forms of noise abatement. Many homes are very close to the highway, particularly along TH 100 and TH 62, which were constructed before noise abatement was provided as part of highway construction. Residents of these neighborhoods are exposed to high levels of traffic noise and have direct views of highway traffic from their homes and yards. The City of Edina has tried unsuccessfully for several years to obtain retroactive freeway noise relief and has lobbied the State Legislature for funding to provide noise abatement. Mn/DOT completed a Minnesota Highway Noise Abatement Study in February 1997 at the direction of the State Legislature. That study identified 54 areas along trunk highways offering the most c9st- effective opportunities for retroactive noise mitigation. Cost - effectiveness was based on the cost per housing unit to meet state noise standards. Therefore, those areas with higher density housing and lower construction requirements to meet the state noise standards were ranked highest. Although noise levels are very high in some Edina neighborhoods, the only neighborhood in Edina that was ranked in the top 54 priority areas is the neighborhood on the east side of TH 100 north of West 44th Street. There are upcoming major maintenance projects on sections of TH 100 and TH 62 in Edina, but no proposed highway reconstruction projects. It is unlikely that Mn/DOT will construct noise barriers in Edina in the foreseeable future under current state guidelines. Therefore, in the fall of 1998, the Edina City Council directed the preparation of a noise impact study along three freeways in the city (TH 62, TH 100 and TH 169) to address neighborhood concerns about freeway noise (Figure 1). The Edina Freeway Noise Mitigation Study addresses the technical and financial feasibility of constructing noise walls, other forms of noise abatement and visual screening. Potential funding sources for noise abatement are evaluated, and conceptual designs for various forms of noise abatement and visual screening are presented. The study was developed with ongoing involvement of the affected residential neighborhoods over a period of approximately one year. The City currently does not have the funds to provide noise abatement along these corridors and responsibility for freeway noise abatement rests with Mn/DOT. The results of the Edina Freeway Noise Mitigation Study will be used to seek funding and to negotiate with Mn/DOT for the provision of freeway noise abatement along existing highways. Freeway Noise Mitigation Study 4 Edina, Minnesota 'it 3.0 STUDY PROCESS The direction of the Edina City Council in authorizing the Freeway Noise Mitigation Study was to work with the affected residential neighborhoods to identify their concerns and preferences. Residents were to make recommendations to the City Council on strategies for reducing noise or providing visual screening from the roadway. Neighborhoods were involved through three neighborhood committees and a resident survey. 3.1 SURVEY OF RESIDENTS Survey questionnaires were sent to 864 Edina residents living adjacent to or one house from TH 62, TH 100 and TH 169 (see Appendix A for questionnaire). All survey recipients were asked if they would like to serve on a neighborhood committee for the study. The survey asked residents: • To rank freeway traffic noise from very quiet to very loud during different times of the day. To rank the relative importance of safety, noise levels, views, aesthetics and cost. If they would support a special assessment to construct noise or visual barriers and, if so, how much they would be willing to pay each year for ten years. Of the 864 surveys sent, 49 percent responded to the survey and 30 percent indicated they were interested in volunteering for the neighborhood committees. 3.1.1 Perceived Loudness of Noise The results of the survey show that, for most of the day, people feel that freeway noise is approximately 4 on a scale of 5 with 0 being very quiet and 5 being very loud (see Figure 2). People generally feel that freeway traffic noise is quite loud during most times of the day, except very late at night. 3.1.2 Relative Importance of Issues Survey respondents were asked to indicate the relative importance of safety, noise levels, views beyond their yard, aesthetics and cost (see Figure 3). The survey results indicate that all of these issues are important. All issues received a rating of 3.5 or more on a 0 -5 scale with 5 being very important. However, noise was given a significantly higher rating than the other issues (4.2 -4.3) in all three neighborhoods. Care should be taken in interpreting the results of the survey because committee members indicated that people interpreted the questions differently. For example, some people may have given a high rating of importance to "views beyond the yard" because they like their view, while Freeway Noise Mitigation Study Edina, Minnesota st" 1 �:� �ii��- i �i �G t`4, 3 � I I I%I � 1�1 ICI III Bill F"///,I others may have given "views beyond yard" a high rating of importance because they dislike their view. Most people say they would prefer to have the view of a roadway blocked, but some residents prefer an open view of a roadway because they also have a view of a park or open space (an example is the neighborhood north of Crosstown, which views Rosland Park across the highway). Other residents prefer an open view because they have concerns about safety, they fear sunlight would be blocked by a noise wall or fence, or they like to watch the traffic. 3.1.3 Assessments Respondents to the survey indicated that they would be willing to spend an average of approximately $260 per year for ten years for visual screening or noise barriers. However, individual responses ranged from zero to $1,000 or more. The average includes those respondents who would prefer to pay nothing. Figure 4 shows. the average amount of money that the respondents in each area would be willing to pay per year over ten years for visual screening or noise barriers. 3.2 NEIGHBORHOOD COMMITTEES All of the survey respondents who indicated a desire to be on a neighborhood committee were invited to attend a series of meetings as a representative of their neighborhood. Three committees were established — one for each of the three highway corridors. Each committee met three times. The first series of meetings was held during February 1999. During these meetings, the City presented the results of the resident survey, background information on upcoming Mn/DOT projects and the Mn/DOT noise abatement study, a brief summary of "Sound Basics" (Minnesota Pollution Control Agency) and photographs of various noise barrier materials. Committee members were asked to be prepared to voice preferences and concerns for their neighborhoods at the next meeting. Barrier preferences and noise monitoring results were discussed at the second series of meetings held in April 1999. Committee members were presented with aerial photographs showing potential locations and types of barriers that would be feasible in specific locations. Committee members were asked for input on any details they could provide about each of the freeway corridors. These aerial photos were revised to reflect the preferences of committee members and are described later in this report. A third combined meeting was held in November 1999 to present the draft report and consultant recommendations based on the technical research and neighborhood committee input. Comments received at this meeting are reflected in the final report. Freeway Noise Mitigation Study Edina, Minnesota $350 $320.00 L $300 W } $264.71 $260.19 c $239.73 $250 L 0 CIS $187.50 $200 L Q. o $150 E Q m c $100 a� Q' $50 $0 Area 1 Area 2 Area 3 Area 4 All Areas TH 100 No. TH 62 TH 169 TH 100 So. Note: Includes those not willing to pay anything Figure 4 — Willingness to Pay Edina Freeway Noise Mitigation Study 4.0 TRAFFIC NOISE Part of the purpose of the Edina Freeway Noise Mitigation Study was to present information that would help people understand what creates traffic noise, how it is measured, how noise can be mitigated and how much noise mitigation costs. This portion of the report summarizes the research conducted for the study. 4.1 WHAT CAUSES TRAFFIC NOISE? Traffic noise consists of vehicular engine noise and tire noise from contact with the roadway surface. Thus, noise will vary depending on the volume and mix of traffic and the roadway surface material and condition. Trucks, for example, are noisier than cars because engines are larger, the vehicle sits higher up from the surface, tire surface is greater (due to size and number of wheels), and the exhaust system is near the top of the vehicle. Noise is the audible result of the movement of air, referred to as sound waves. Traffic- generated sound waves are described by two basic parameters: frequency and amplitude. Frequency refers to the number of sound waves produced within a given time period, expressed in units of cycles per second. Amplitude is the energy level or "loudness" of a sound wave, expressed in units called decibels (dB). Generally, traffic noise will increase as: (1) traffic volumes increase, (2) distance from the road decreases, (3) pavement condition deteriorates, and (4) the number of trucks increases. However, significant changes in these conditions must occur before a measurable difference in noise occurs. 4.2 HOW IS NOISE MEASURED? When analyzing traffic- generated noise, the units of sound measurement are modified because the human ear is efficient at blocking out very low- and very high- frequency sound. As a result, sound frequencies are weighted according to the "A" scale, and the resulting sound levels are reported as dB(A). The "A" weighting provides a more accurate representation of the human ear's sensitivity to sounds of various frequencies. Sound energy or "loudness" is measured on a logarithmic scale. This means that a doubling of sound energy (for example, doubling the traffic volume) raises the measured noise level by approximately three decibels, and a tenfold increase in sound energy raises the noise level by approximately ten decibels. According to "rules of thumb" published by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), included in Appendix B, traffic noise level changes of three decibels are considered barely perceptible. Changes less than three decibels are imperceptible to most people. Traffic noise can vary considerably over short time periods. Traffic noise is, therefore, expressed as the percent of time a sound level is exceeded, denoted by the letter L with a subscript. For example, L10 = 60 dB(A) means that the noise level exceeded 60 dB(A) during 10 percent of the measurement period and was at or less than 60 decibels 90 percent of the measurement period. The measurement period for noise analysis is usually one hour. Freeway Noise Mitigation Study 11 Edina, Minnesota 4.3 WHAT ARE THE STATE AND FEDERAL NOISE STANDARDS? State noise standards are established for a daytime peak hour between the hours of 7 a.m. and 10 p.m., and a nighttime peak hour between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. The daytime peak hour is typically equivalent to the afternoon rush hour, approximately 4:30 -5:30 p.m. The nighttime peak hour is usually 6:00 -7:00 a.m., which is the start of the morning rush hour. The State Llo noise standards are 65 dB(A) for the daytime peak hour and 55 dB(A) for the nighttime peak hour. There are no federal noise standards, but the federal noise abatement criteria for L10 noise levels is 70 dB(A). If a roadway construction project requires an Indirect Source Permit from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), then noise standards must be met unless noise mitigation is not technically or financially feasible. Mn/DOT and MPCA have established guidelines for financial feasibility. All freeways and all state highways are subject to the state noise standards. All other county and city roadways, except those within Minneapolis and St. Paul, are exempt from the state noise standards. Typical noise levels produced by everyday sources are shown in Figure 5. 4.4 WHAT ARE EXISTING FREEWAY NOISE LEVELS? Existing noise levels along freeways in Edina were not monitored for the Edina Freeway Noise Mitigation Study. However, previous studies indicate that Llo daytime noise levels of 65 -70+ dB(A) and nighttime noise levels of 60 -65+ dB(A) are common along freeways without noise barriers. 5.0 TYPES OF BARRIERS Noise levels can be reduced if the line of sight is broken between the source of the noise and the receptor of the noise. To be effective, noise mitigation generally requires high material mass and an unbroken barrier. The general types of barriers considered in the Edina Freeway Noise Mitigation Study included noise walls, berms, fencing and landscaping. Each of these is described below. 5.1 NOISE WALLS Noise walls are high mass barriers constructed to Nh /DOT standards. These walls are designed to reduce noise a minimum of five decibels. Mn/DOT does not consider any material that does not achieve this minimum reduction to be an effective noise barrier. The height of the wall is determined based on the height needed to achieve state noise standards and the cost - effectiveness of meeting those standards. Noise walls are typically 10 -15 feet in height. In general, noise walls over 20 feet are not constructed due to their cost. Noise walls may be tiered, they can be designed in many ways and with various materials, and they can be used in combination with land berms. Several examples of noise walls are provided in Figure 6, and a typical cross - section is shown in Figure 7. Freeway Noise Mitigation Study 12 Edina, Minnesota Common Outdoor Noise Level Common Indoor Noise Levels (dBA) Noise Levels 110 Rock Band Jet at 100 ft. 100 Inside Subway Train (New York) Gas Lawn Mower at 3 ft. 90 Diesel Truck at 50 ft. Food Blender at 3 ft. Noisy Urban Daytime 80 Garbage Disposal at 3 ft. Shouting at 3 ft. Gas Lawn Mower at 100 ft. 70 Vacuum Cleaner at 10 ft. Commercial Area Normal Speech at 3 ft. Heavy Traffic at 300 ft. 60 Large Business Office Quiet Urban Daytime 50 Dishwasher Next. Room 40 Small Theatre /Large Conference Room Quiet Urban Nighttime (Background) Quiet Suburban Nighttime 30 Library Bedroom at Night Concert Hall (Background) Quiet Rural Nighttime 20 Broadcast and Recording Studio 10 Threshold of Hearing 0 Source: Noise Control — New Standards: W.R. Green; California Department of Transportation; Paper presented at AASHO Annual Meeting November 14, 1973. Figure 5 - Noise Level Comparisons Edina Freeway Noise Mitigation Study 1. Concrete post and wood noise wall on 77th in Richfield 2 Wood Noise wall on 1 -394 in Minneapolis 3, Concrete post and wood noise wall on 1 -35W in Bloomington 4, Textured concrete block noise wall Figure 6 — Examples of Noise Walls Edina Freeway Noise Mitigation Study RANDOMLY PLACED, TIGHTLY TYPICAL FENCE ABUTTED BOARDS CAP BOARD TRIM BOARD POST GROUND LINE I ! .1 -.3 m4-.. ' SCREEN ELEVATION SECTION AT POST NOT TO SCALE TYPICAL NOISE WALL 2.44 m MAX. POST SPACING (TYPICAL) TONGUE& I GROOVE WOOD PLANKS ABOVE GROUND E i i LQ n I GROUND UNE BERM BERM SECTION AT POST FRONT ELEVATION NOT TO SCALE TYPICAL JERSEY BARRIER .15 m MIN. .81 m GROUND LINE � � .52 m MIN. NOT TO SCALE TYPE A Figure 7 — Typical Sections for Noise Walls, Fences and Jersey Barriers Edina Freeway Noise Mitigation Study While most noise walls are made of wood and/or concrete, there is a variety of other materials available. Included in Appendix C is a Noise Wall Materials Comparison Matrix that was published in the Wall Journal, May /June 1996. This matrix shows a variety of alternative materials for noise walls, including composite and plastic, and provides estimated costs for various material types. Wooden noise walls meeting Mn/DOT's criteria for sound transmission loss cost approximately $15 per square foot for an 8 -foot wall, or $120 per linear foot. Costs increase exponentially as the height of the wall increases and become prohibitive at a height of approximately 20 feet. Concrete "jersey barriers" or guardrail may be used in combination with wooden walls in some locations for safety reasons. It is possible, though unproven, that a jersey barrier alone may reduce noise somewhat by blocking tire noise. There was an interest expressed by residents in the provision of noise walls on bridges, particularly on TH 100 over Minnehaha Creek. However, the feasibility of noise walls on bridges is dependent on the structural condition of the bridge and the weight of the proposed noise wall. 5.2 FENCES Many residents install privacy fences along streets and highways to provide a visual barrier between their yards and the roadway, and believe that fencing will reduce noise. While privacy fencing is typically not considered an effective means of noise mitigation, many residents on the neighborhood committees expressed an interest in using privacy fencing due to its lower cost and its appearance. A solid privacy fence costs approximately $10 per square foot for an 8- foot -high fence ($80 per linear foot). Examples of fencing are shown in Figure 8 and a typical cross - section is shown in Figure 7. Noise level monitoring was conducted at four locations in or near Edina to assess the effectiveness of privacy fencing compared to noise walls. Noise levels were monitored behind and beside or in front of existing privacy fences along freeways. The monitoring results are summarized in Table 1. Based on the monitoring results, the best - performing fencing was the Mn/DOT "visual barrier" located north of TH 62 in Minneapolis east of Penn Avenue. This barrier achieved a 5 -6 decibel reduction in noise. The barrier is constructed of materials that are the same as the materials used for noise walls and is a high mass wood fence with no gaps. This is not a typical privacy fence. Two other fences more typical of privacy fences were monitored and found to be significantly less effective in reducing noise levels. A solid, 8- foot -high privacy fence located north of TH 62 at Vernon Hills Road reduced noise levels 0 -3 decibels at the homes north of Vernon Hills Road. An 8- foot -high privacy fence with many gaps located east of TH 160 at Indian Way West had no effect on noise levels at the residences east of the frontage road. These results, as well as other research on roadway noise abatement, indicate that fences are significantly less effective than standard noise walls in reducing traffic noise levels. The mass, height and lack of gaps /spaces in the fence contribute to the ability of a fence to reduce noise levels. While fencing, in general, cannot be considered an effective means of noise Freeway Noise Mitigation Study 16 Edina, Minnesota Above: Nine Mile Village — Crosstown. At Right: "Visual Barrier" along TH 62 at Logan constructed of noise wall material. Y . . Y At left: Valley View Road — West of Southdale. Below: Vernon Hills Road — Crosstown Figure 8 — Examples of Fences Edina Freeway Noise Mitigation Study TABLE 1 NOISE MONITORING AT DIFFERENT TYPES OF FENCING AND WALLS Location Fence L10 L50 Description of Fencing 1 Logan and 62nd Street Yes 67 65 The barrier is a 10- foot -high "visual barrier." Constructed with the same materials used for noise walls. Morgan and 62nd Street No 73 70 Reduction due to fencing 16 15 Note: Constructed with the same materials used for noise walls. Noise reduction estimates the noise level reduction at the south edge of the residential properties north of 62nd Street. 2 Vernon Hills Road (directly behind fence) Yes 61 59 The barrier is an 8- foot -high solid privacy fence. Vernon Hills Road (Across Vernon Hills Road) Yes 73 68 Vernon Hills Road (between fence and highway) No 73 70 Vernon Hills Road (at gap in fence) No 173 171 Reduction due to fencing 10 13 Note: Noise reduction estimates the noise level reduction at the south edge of the residential properties North of Vernon Hills Road. 3 Apartment complex SE of 7th Street at TH 169 Yes 72 69 The barrier is a 10- foot -high NWDOT noise wall on TH 169 bridge. TH 169 is elevated about 10 feet above monitor. Wetland south of apartment complex No 73 . 70 Reduction due to fencing 1 1 Note: Constructed with the same materials used for noise walls. Noise reduction estimates the noise level reduction at the west side of the apartment building. 4 Indian Way West Yes 176 171 IThe barrier is an 8 -foot high fence with many gaps. Indian Way West No 176 171 Reduction due to fencing 10 10 Note: Constructed with the same materials used for noise walls. Noise reduction estimates the noise level reduction at the west edge of the residential properties east of TH 169 5 5036 Normandale Court 1 166 163 No comparison monitoring Freeway Noise Mitigation Study 18 Edina, Minnesota abatement, it does block the view of traffic. For some people, this may reduce their perception of noise even though a significant noise decrease may not be measurable. Properly designed fencing with landscaping can have aesthetic and screening benefits as well. 5.3 BERMS Berms are natural hills or constructed mounds of dirt that block the line of sight between the highway and adjacent homes. Berms are rounded on top, usually landscaped and may be combined with short noise walls or fences. Berms require significant horizontal space, as shown in Figure 9. A slope of 3:1 is desirable if the berm is to be mowed. Therefore, a 10- foot -high berm will require a width of 70 feet (30 feet in each direction from the centerline of the berm plus 10 feet for rounding on the top of the berm). A slope of 2:1 is acceptable if the berm is landscaped and not mowed. A 10- foot -high berm with a 2:1 slope will require a width of 50 feet. The width required for a berm can be reduced by using retaining walls in some circumstances. A 10- foot -high constructed berm with a 3:1 slope would typically cost about $200 per linear foot. Berms can sometimes be provided at no cost if they are constructed as part of another project that has excess materials. 5.4 LANDSCAPING Landscaping is not considered an effective means of noise reduction unless the landscaping is coniferous (evergreens), approximately 100 feet in depth, with branches down to the ground and planted very close together so there are no gaps. However, landscaping can block the view of traffic and soften the appearance of highway edges, noise walls or fencing. For some people, this may reduce their perception of noise, even though a significant noise decrease may not be measurable. Properly designed landscaping can have aesthetic and screening benefits that are highly valued by residents. 6.0 FEASIBILITY ASSESSMENT A complete inventory and evaluation was made of each highway corridor to assess the feasibility of providing noise abatement. The results of this evaluation are presented in Figures 10 -12. Each figure shows the locations where noise barriers currently exist, where there is room for potential berming and landscaping, and where potential noise walls or fences could be constructed. 6.1 EXISTING NOISE BARRIERS There are noise barriers in place along the southern portion of TH 100 and along the northeast portion of TH 169. These noise walls were designed and built by Mn/DOT. There are also several locations where residents have installed privacy fences. These fences are adequate for visual buffering, but are ineffective for noise mitigation. If significant noise abatement is desired, the fencing would need to be replaced. Existing walls and berms are noted in light blue lines and shading on Figures 10 -12. Freeway Noise Mitigation Study 19 Edina, Minnesota FIGURE 9 - SPACE REQUIREMENTS FOR VARIOUS TYPES OF BERMS Edina Freeway Noise Mitigation Study Legend Existing Wall Existing Berm Potential Wall or Fence Location Potential Berm Location Note: Noise walls / fences may be provided at potential berm locations. Landscaping is desirable at all locations. T N West v ... v.. ............,... v.vv.•v ...... v. ­.Y Nu...—..y v..wa...y road may not be desirable FIGURE 10- SUGGESTED MITIGATION TH 62 Edina Freeway Noise Mitigation Study Legend Existing Wall Existing Berm Potential Wall or Fence Location Potential Berm Location Note: Noise walls / fences may be provided at potential berm locations. Landscaping is desirable at all locations. Z—> South North FIGURE 11 - SUGGESTED MITIGATION TH 169 Edina Freeway Noise Mitigation Study Legend Existing Wall Existing Berm °- Potential Wall or Fence Location Potential Berm Location Note: Noise walls / fences may be provided at potential berm locations. Landscaping is desirable at all locations. South North Z FIGURE 12 - SUGGESTED MITIGATION TH 100 Edina Freeway Noise Mitigation Study 6.2 PROPOSED BERMS Berms and landscaping are proposed in all areas where sufficient space exists. Berms, where feasible, are desirable due to potential low cost, proven effectiveness in blocking noise transmission and improved aesthetic quality. Berms can be constructed at low cost because construction projects often produce excess material that must be removed from the site and deposited elsewhere. Contractors can deposit this excess dirt in a proposed berm location at no extra cost to their project. Locations that would be suitable for potential berming and landscaping are shaded green on Figures 10 -12. Noise walls and/or fencing could also be provided in these locations. There are two locations — north of TH 62 from St. Johns Avenue to Virginia Avenue and southwest of the TH 100/TH 62 cloverleaf — where the placement of berms would require filling in a frontage road or a cul -de -sac. However, property access could still be provided and, therefore, it would be feasible to berm in these locations. Berms are usually placed within the public roadway right -of -way. However, if a property owner is willing and space is limited within the roadway right -of -way, it would be possible to place the fill material on private property. When a berm, barrier or fence is constructed on private property, maintenance becomes the property owner's responsibility. Berms are subject to the availability of excess fill and, therefore, costs may vary substantially. In recent years, the City has been using excess fill from roadway construction projects to create berms for noise abatement. This practice should continue. In addition, the City should contact Hennepin County and Mn/DOT to determine if excess fill from other roadway projects could be made available to create noise abatement berms along highways in Edina. It may also be possible to obtain excess fill from private construction projects in the City. These activities would substantially decrease the cost of providing noise berms. 6.3 PROPOSED NOISE WALLS AND /OR FENCING Noise walls or fencing are recommended where there is not sufficient space for berms. These locations are shown as red lines in Figures 10 -12. Mn/DOT will soon undertake major maintenance projects along TH 100 and TH 62 that will involve pavement overlays, safety features and replacement of deteriorated fencing, guardrail and similar features. Noise abatement is not included in these projects. However, Mn/DOT has indicated they would be willing to provide privacy fencing where chain link fencing needs to be replaced. Mn/DOT would require 50 -50 cost sharing (Mn/DOT would contribute up to approximately $20 per linear foot) for the privacy fencing and would not permit it inside the highway's clear zone due to safety and maintenance concerns. Current plans call for replacement of fencing along TH 62, but not along TH 100. The City should continue to work with Mn/DOT to include noise walls or privacy fencing and landscaping in these projects, since costs could be reduced if work is completed simultaneously with highway maintenance. The proposed maintenance projects should be reviewed to determine if any other elements could be revised or supplemented to meet the City's objectives with regard to noise mitigation and visual buffering. Freeway Noise Mitigation Study 24 Edina, Minnesota Several locations may require noise walls or fences to be incorporated into existing guardrails and bridges. If crash attenuation barriers need to be reconstructed to build a fence, the cost will increase dramatically. For this reason, the placement of fences should be outside the highway's clear zone to avoid guardrail and concrete barriers. However, in locations where this is unavoidable, every effort should be made to keep the fencing continuous and uniform in style. Appendix D presents approximate costs for each potential barrier section and the approximate number of residences protected. Also included on these tables is the discounted price that assumes Mn/DOT cooperation in replacing the existing chain link fences with privacy fences. 6.4 TYPICAL CROSS - SECTIONS Figures 13 -15 show typical cross - section views of each topographical sub -area in each corridor. These typical cross - sections show the approximate height of the barrier needed to break the line of sight from the receptor to the noise source. Final design of noise barriers or fences would be required prior to construction. 7.0 POSSIBLE FUNDING SOURCES Funding specifically for retroactive noise abatement, except for the Mn/DOT Noise Abatement Study priority sites, is essentially non - existent. The City has supported proposed state legislation creating a fund for noise abatement but, to date, the legislation has not been passed. The City should continue to lobby for funding in the Legislature. 7.1 MN /DOT PROJECTS As noted previously, Mn/DOT is planning two major maintenance projects in Edina on TH 100 and TH 62 involving pavement overlays and replacement of deteriorated parts. As part of these maintenance projects, chain link fences in residential areas along TH 62 will be replaced. Replacement of fencing along TH 100 is not planned at this time. These fences could be upgraded to privacy fences; however, this will substantially increase fencing costs. It is not Mn/DOT's current policy to provide noise abatement, privacy fencing or landscaping when doing major maintenance projects. However, Mn/DOT has indicated they will install lightweight privacy fencing where existing chain link fencing is scheduled to be replaced if the City will participate in 50 -50 cost sharing (Mn/DOT would contribute up to approximately $20 per linear foot). Due to snow storage and safety concerns, replacement of chain link fencing with privacy fencing may not be possible in areas where roadside right -of -way is limited. These amenities are considered part of the project when a roadway is reconstructed, particularly if additional capacity is provided and/or additional right -of -way is required. The City should continue to work actively with Mn/DOT to provide noise mitigation or, at a minimum, privacy fencing as a part of these upcoming projects. It is unlikely that opportunities will arise in these corridors for many years after these maintenance projects are completed. Since Mn/DOT is willing to fund only up to 50 percent of fencing upgrades, the City will need to seek sources of funding for the remaining cost. Timing is critical to incorporate these changes into the upcoming projects. Freeway Noise Mitigation Study 25 Edina, Minnesota TH 100 Exit Ramp Landscape Plantings TH 100 (North Bound) 8' Wooden Noise Wall Z - �;,�'*"s� h r� � �,:� ,'`'y7� �X� � Ff�'4;• �' _,��' t �'2s"�� �° �'e i� _n w r R' I 30' 24' 10' 8' Wooden Noise Wall and Rail Support System TH 100 (South Bound) ' - g.� b 3 A.`u' i •Y 'fi- „r�”` `t � �V 'YJ 't+,t f FIGURE 13 -TYPICAL CROSS - SECTIONS TH 100 Edina Freeway Noise Mitigation Study Planted Slope TH 62 (East Bound) 4 }� •tea. _ 10' 30' 8' Wooden Noise Wall Frontage Road TH 62 (West Bound) F IeTdl F iyr y, nAa +?- P�.s t�s'Yt Z 'uc-2 tr+Y r.,= ....�r y',`�FxS t�S 'N :"y a t �' •,- ki�,n✓,,,.' „2 y. t �S _ - �”' I 20' 10' I FIGURE 14 - TYPICAL CROSS - SECTIONS TH 62 Edina Freeway Noise Mitigation Study 7.2 STATE AND FEDERAL FUNDING SOURCES There are no federal or state funding sources specifically set aside for noise abatement. As noted above, Mn/DOT funds noise abatement as part of new construction or reconstruction projects. In addition, Mn/DOT is funding the construction of retrofit noise walls for the highest priority areas identified in their 1997 noise study. One of these sites is partially located within the City of Edina (east of TH 100, north of West 44th Street). While there are no dedicated funds for noise abatement, the following state, federal and regional funds may be used for noise mitigation if the funding criteria are met. In some cases, the noise abatement may need to be part of a larger project. • Transportation Revolving Loan Fund • TEA -21 Enhancement Funds • STP Funds • Local Road Research Board • Metropolitan Council Livable Communities Grants It should be noted that none of these funding sources have been successfully used for roadway noise walls, fencing or landscaping to date. The City of Edina has worked with other metropolitan area communities to obtain state funding of noise mitigation through the State Legislature. A bill was introduced during the 1998 -99 session, but was not passed. The City should continue to pursue legislative mandate, as well as other avenues, because noise mitigation is very expensive and funding sources for retroactive construction of noise walls are extremely limited. 7.3 CITY FUNDING SOURCES It can be argued that Mn/DOT should be responsible for the full cost of noise mitigation and visual buffering because these impacts are caused by traffic on trunk highways. However, it appears unlikely that full funding will be forthcoming at this time. Therefore, the City needs to consider other options for paying for noise and visual barriers. City funding options include general revenues, bonding and special assessments. The three freeway corridors are primary points of access to and through the City of Edina and, therefore, reflect on the aesthetic character of the entire community. Accordingly, it would be desirable to have some consistency in the appearance, size and quality of fencing and landscaping along each of the subject corridors. It is reasonable to argue that the City as a whole would receive benefit from the provision of these amenities along major corridors throughout the City. Thus, it would be appropriate to use general revenues or bonds to fund these amenities. However, these needs must be weighed against other needs in the community because financial resources are limited. Special assessment is one tool the City could use for paying for noise walls and visual barriers because these improvements benefit the adjacent properties. As might be expected, opinions of residents regarding special assessments are quite varied. Freeway Noise Mitigation Study 29 Edina, Minnesota Respondents to the residents' survey said they would be willing to spend from nothing to $1,000 or more per year for ten years for visual screening or noise barriers. On the average, people were willing to pay approximately $260 per year for ten years. People attending the neighborhood meetings also expressed a wide range of opinions on this subject. An assessment of $260 per year for ten years would cover up to 25 percent of the cost for privacy fencing and somewhat mature landscaping on a typical residential lot. 7.4 MN /DOT COMMUNITY ROADSIDE LANDSCAPING PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM Landscaping can be provided on public right -of -way through the Mn/DOT Community Roadside Landscaping Partnership Program. This program provides technical and financial assistance to install and maintain plantings on eligible state highway rights -of -way. Mn/DOT funds are provided on approved projects to cover the cost of planting materials procured by the community partner. Only planting materials are eligible for funding. The community partner (city or neighborhood) must install the landscaping materials using volunteers, employees, service organizations, contractors or a combination thereof, and must agree to maintain the landscaping improvements. Neighborhood involvement in planting is encouraged but not required. People at the neighborhood committee meetings indicated that most neighborhoods and homeowners would be willing to assist in planting trees and shrubs, but would prefer that landscaping materials with some maturity. The City should continue to support this program and, where financially possible, should supplement the program. The City should strongly encourage neighborhoods to be involved in planting and maintenance. As in the case of berms, walls and fences, the landscaping will usually be provided within the roadway right -of -way. However, the City should explore the possibility of planting on private property if the property owner is willing and would be responsible for ongoing maintenance. 8.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Results of the neighborhood committee process indicate that residents living near freeways in Edina are generally in favor of some form of barrier between their homes and the freeways. There are differences of opinion about the best type of barrier, the length of the barrier and who should pay. However, people generally felt that berms would be preferable where space allows, and privacy fencing would be helpful and acceptable if it is not financially feasible to construct noise walls. Most people also felt it was important to provide landscaping with all forms of barriers, including berms, fences and noise walls. Freeway Noise Mitigation Study 30 Edina, Minnesota At this time, it is unlikely that funding will be available for the full cost of noise walls. Therefore, it is recommended that the following strategies be pursued to provide some relief to the neighborhoods impacted by the freeways in the City: • Work with Mn/DOT on a cost - sharing basis to provide privacy fencing and landscaping as part of the TH 100 and TH 62 major maintenance projects that are currently scheduled. • Work aggressively with the Legislature to establish a state funding source for retrofit noise mitigation, privacy fencing and/or landscaping. • Determine an appropriate level of local funding for fencing and landscaping and leverage those funds to gain higher levels of state and federal participation in projects. • Identify demonstration projects that might fit the criteria for TEA -21 Enhancement, Livable Communities and Local Road Research Board funding and apply for grants. These funds have not yet been successfully used for noise abatement projects to date. • Establish policies and procedures that ensure excess fill materials from City projects are made available for use as noise berms wherever space is available. In addition, work with Mn/DOT, Hennepin County and private contractors to obtain excess fill for this purpose. • Work with private property owners to identify locations where excess fill could be placed on private property for noise mitigation purposes. • Participate in the Mn/DOT Community Roadside Landscaping Partnership Program to the greatest extent possible, providing supplemental funds so that more mature planting materials can be used. • Establish policies, procedures and design standards for the provision of fencing and landscaping in all residential areas along freeways. • Establish a local cost - sharing policy for fencing and landscaping. The following is suggested, but does not reflect current state or federal policies: — 50 percent state /federal funding — 25 percent City (general city funds) — 25 percent neighborhood (special assessments, private funds, in -kind contributions) • Involve neighborhoods in the final design of fencing and noise walls and in the selection of landscaping materials. Freeway Noise Mitigation Study 31 Edina, Minnesota APPENDIX A EDINA NOISE STUDY QUESTIONNAIRE Survey EDINA NOISE STUDY QUESTIONNAIRE Name Please check here if you want to volunteer to be Address a committee member. ❑ Phone number: Opinion of noise situation (mark x in box that describes highway noise at your home) Important Issues (mark x in box that describes how important this issue is to you) Very Quiet Quiet Average Loud Very Loud • Safety y/n y/n y/n y/n y/n • Early Morning (6 a.m. — 7 a.m.) • Daytime (7 a.m. — 6 p.m.) • Evening (6 p.m. —10 p.m.) • Late Night (10 p.m. —12 p.m.) Important Issues (mark x in box that describes how important this issue is to you) Would you want noise mitigation if there would be a special tax assessment to your property of: (please circle y or n) year for 10 years: Not Important Somewhat Important Average Important Very Important • Safety y/n y/n y/n y/n y/n • Noise levels • Views beyond yard • Aesthetics (such as landscaping) • Cost • Other (specify) Would you want noise mitigation if there would be a special tax assessment to your property of: (please circle y or n) year for 10 years: $200 $400 $600 $800 $1,000 [?!�7 y/n y/n y/n y/n y/n Comments APPENDIX B MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY "RULES OF THUMB" RULES OF THUMB WHEN A SOUND LEVEL INCREASES BY 10 DECIBELS, THE SUBJECTIVE RESPONSE IS A DOUBLING OF LOUDNESS. EXAMPLE: 60 decibels to 70 decibels — twice as loud Chance in sound level — Perceived chance in "loudness" f 1 dB — requires close attention to notice 3 dB — barely perceptible f 5 dB — quite noticeable ±10 dB — dramatic difference: — twice (or half) as loud ±20 dB — striking: fourfold change WHEN THE DISTANCE IS DOUBLED FROM A POINT SOURCE THE SOUND LEVEL DROPS 6 DECIBELS. EXAMPLE: 50' = 60 decibels 100' = 54 decibels 200' = 48 decibels WHEN THE DISTANCE IS DOUBLED FROM A LINE SOURCE THE SOUND LEVEL DROPS 3 DECIBELS. EXAMPLE: 50' = 70 decibels 100' = 67 decibels 200' = 64 decibels A DOUBLING OF ENERY YIELDS AN INCREASE OF 3 DECIBELS EXAMPLE: 85 decibels + 85 decibels = 88 decibels THE NOISE SOURCE BEING MEASURED SHOULD BE AT LEAST 10 DECIBELS ABOV THE BACKGROUND LEVEL . KEEP AT LEAST AS FAR FROM ANY LARGE REFLECTING OBJECTS AS YOU ARE FROM THE SOURCE YOU ARE MEASURING ALL MEASUREMENTS SHALL BE MADE WITH THE MICROPHONE AT LEAST THREE FEET ABOVE THE GROUND SOURCE: MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY SUGGESTED NOISE CONTROL TECHNIQUES FOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS 1) USE OF BUFFERS: Setbacks can be provided in the form of open space, frontage roads, recreational areas, garages, etc. between the noise source and the receiver. The objective is to achieve attenuation of noise with distance. 2) USE OF BARRIERS: This includes walls, berms or other structures intended to provide excess attenuation by blocking noise from the source. For traffic noise, the practical limit is 15 -20 dBA noise reduction, although insertion loss up to 24 dBA is possible at high frequencies. 3) UNIT DESIGN: Placement of relatively sensitive rooms or fixtures away from the noise source is a cost - effective technique. Garages, bathrooms, and storage areas can serve as internal noise barriers for bedrooms and living rooms. 4) BUILDING ORIENTATION: Using one building to shield another can reduce noise control costs, as can placing the narrow end of buildings toward the noise source instead of the wide portion. Placing yards or patios inside the "L" of "U" of buildings can reduce outdoor noise exposures if these face away from the noise source. 5) BUILDING DESIGN: External building facades can influence reflected noise levels affecting adjacent buildings and streets. Bell- shaped or irregular building facades can reduce or eliminate the "urban canyon" effect. 6) NOISE ATTENUATION BY BUILDING: The most obvious example of this technique is the reduction of window area on noise - impacted facades. Practices such as the use of double or staggered -stud walls, acoustical glazing (with low air - infiltration window frames), resilient channels, etc., are effective in reducing interior noise levels. weather stripping and caulking of wall penetrations is essential. *A NOTE ON LANDSCAPING FOR NOISE CONTROL* Shrubs and trees are worth little as tools for noise control. Effective belts of trees for useful noise control must be at least 50 feet tall, must be in a continuous strip 75 -100 feet deep, must have dense foilage down to the ground, and must be evergreen to supply protection year round. This type of stand takes about 20 years to grow, is extravagant in terms of space required, and is of limited use against elevated sources such as aircraft, or for protecting high -rise dwellings. Plant greenery for its own sake — not for noise control. SOURCE: MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY APPENDIX C NOISE WALL MATERIALS COMPARISON MATRIX NOISE WALL MATERIALS COMPARISON MATRIX UPDATED BY DAVID R. FREUDENRICH SENIOR ENGINEER MAGUIRE GROUP INC. 564 FORBES AVENUE, SUITE 1212 PITTSBURGH, PA 15219 -2903 I have updated the original matrix included in an earlier issue of The Wall Journal comparing various noise wall mate- rials to include new noise products which have come on the market as well as include some of those that I had missed ear- lier. Since the formulations for the noise wall materials change constantly, I have also included those materials which I had previously included in my analyses. The composition of some noise wall materials have been recently modified resulting in differences in stated NRC values. Due to the complexity of selecting a suitable noise wall material for a specific project, additional information has been added indicating specific ASTM tests which were used to eval- uate each material. The ASTM testing data was provided by the noise wall manufacturers in their product literature and indi- cates which tests were passed by each material to date. I have added information pertaining to what ASTM tests each material has passed because I believe my analysis points out a glaring concern - that a specific set of tests should be developed by ASTM and the Industry to evaluate noise wall material properties and that such testing procedures should be standardized in the United States so that all materials are sub- ject to the same series of tests. These tests would have to be modified to account for the physical properties of the material being analyzed, i.e. the criteria developed for testing absorp- tive materials should differ from those criteria developed for reflective materials. For example, absorptive noise wall materials have different characteristics than reflective materials, i.e. a wood /concrete matrix vs. concrete. Therefore, it is critical that the specific tests that are used to quantify a material's physical properties should address certain issues: freeze -thaw cycling, noise reduction, compressive strength, hardness, absorptivity, fire (continued next page) Manufacturer Contact Person Phone No Trade Name Material Type Wall Type Freeze/Thaw PennDOT NRC Value STC Rating Approx SF Wt SF Cost Range ($) Fire Resistance Graffiti Cycle Resistant Approved Resistance CARSONITE INTL Paul Schubring 916 725 -1373 SBS Sound Barrier System Composite Shell, Recycled Tires Inside Reflective Yes Pending 0.15-0.85 36 7.5 Ibs 15.00 - 17.00 Yes ? Varies w /facing Concrete Placement Systems Dan McGhee 703 222 -7054 DuBrook Sound Wall Recycled Rubber, Lightweight Stone Absorptive Yes Not Yet 0.80 42 -45 75 Ibs 6.50-7.50 Yes Yes - Ribbed Insulation Bonded with Cement COR TEC COMPANY , Pat Lanigan 708 596 -5200 SOUND OFF Fiberglass Reinforced Panel Laminate, Reflective Yes No - 32-34 4.5 - 5.0 Ibs 4.00-4.15 Class B Yes Polyester Inside 1/2" - 3/4" thick CSI Wendi Bucher 512 327 -8481 SOUNDTRAP Open Cellular, Free- Draining Absorptive Yes Yes 0.80-1.0 51/40 8.0 Ibs - 3" thick 8.50-18.00 Yes Some - Using Fosroc Cementitious Material Sacrificial Coating CYRO INDUSTRIES Cathy Shashock 203 795 -6081 ACRYLITE 237 Acrylic Sheet Reflective Yes Not Yet - 32-34 3.0. 4.6 Ibs 8.10 - 11.00 Some Yes 1/2" - 3/4" thick 1/2" - 3/4" thick DURISOL International Hans Rerup 905 521 -0999 DURISOL Concrete Composite Panels Absorptive Yes Yes 0.75-0.85 32 47 Ibs 6.00-8.00 Yes Can be removed with Wood Fibers and Portland Cement sacrificial coating I Empire Acoustical Ron Moulder 419522 -0800 Silent Screen 24 -ga. Painted Galvanized Steel or Alum. Absorptive Yes Not Yet 1.05 35 6.3 Ibs 8.00-9.75 Yes Yes Mineral Wool Inside Empire Acoustical Ron Moulder 419 522 -0800 Angle Lock 24 -ga. Painted Galy. Steel or Alum. Skin Reflective Yes Not Yet - 23 2.2 - 2.6 Ibs 5.00-6.00 Yes Yes Faddis Concrete Products John Morris 800 777 -7973 FENCE -CRETE Reinforced Concrete Reflective Yes Not Yet 0.50 31 46:25 Ibs 3.25 Yes When Coated Scott Diehm W. R. Grace John Sorenson 617 498 -4316 Sonotex 35 Portland Cement/Polystyrene Matrix Absorptive ? No 0.75-0.95 36-40 11.0 Ibs ? Yes Rough Surface Sprayed onto Structural Wall Material Hoover Treated Wood Products Glenn Wilson 800 832 -9663 PLYWALL Wood Exterior, Insulation Inside Reflective Yes Not Yet - 38 5.5 Ibs 5.50-6.50 Somewhat ? Industrial Acoustics Company Gary Figallo 718 931 -8000 NOISHIELD Steel or Aluminum Skin Absorptive Yes Not Yet 1.0 31 -38 5.4 -9.8 Ibs 8.00-10.00 Yes Yes - Easily removed Richard Roth Insulation Inside Industrial Acoustics Company Gary Figallo 718 931 -8000 SOUNDCORE Wood Fiber Concrete Absorptive Yes Not Yet 0.75-0.85 51 62 Ibs 7.50.8.50 Sgl Sided Yes Can be removed with Richard Roth Pickett Wall Systems Inc William Pickett 305 927 -1529 MonoWall Precast Concrete Panels with Integral Reflective Yes Not Yet 40 100 Ibs 9.00 -10.00 Dbl Sided 6.00-8.00 Yes sacrificial coating When Coated Precast Concrete Posts PPA Industries George Kruse 800 366 -6700 Landscaper Acoustic Monocote Z -146, Structural Steel Absorptive Yes ? 0.95 36 25.0 Ibs ? Yes Yes Reinforced, Foam - Filled Wire Panels Proudfoot Company, Inc. Jim Loseth 800 445 -0034 Sound Blox Concrete Block with Tuned Absorptive & Yes Not Yet 0.65 53 4.97-10.65 Ibs 8.00-9.00 Yes Yes - Ribbed Surface Internal Baffle Chamber 8" block 8" block with Coatings Quilite International Rod Kotter 310 641 -7701 Quilite Polycarbonate with PVC or Absorptive & Yes No 0.64 25 6.0 Ibs ? Yes Yes Polycarbonate Bezel and Steel Frame Reflective Yes Sound Fighter Systems Guy Legendre 318 86-1-664L LSE 1000/2000 Slotted Polyethylene Element Absorptive Yes No 1.0 31 9.9 Ibs 6.50-8.50 Somewhat Yes I Mineral Wool Gypsum Board I SOUNDZERO Mark Murphy 800 321 -6275 SOUNDZERO Concrete Shell, Insulation Inside Reflective Yes Yes - 33 8 -14 Ibs 17.00 - 30.00 Yes When Coated SOUNDZERO Mark Murphy 800 321 -6275 SOUNDZERO NR Recycled Tires with Polymer Binder Affixed Absorptive Yes Yes 0.80 - 5.25 Ibs 14.00 - 15.00 Class 1 Somewhat to Precast Panel or Cemented to Steel Core 21.00 - 27.00 Will not burn The Reinforced Earth Company Pete Anderson 617 938 -8774 FANWALL Free - Standing Precast Concrete Reflective Yes Yes - 30 125 Ibs 8.00-10.00 Yes When Coated Timber Holdings Ltd Brian Lotz 414 445 -8989 Timbatech Noise Barrier Wood Exterior with Absorptive & Yes Pending 0.85-0.95 32-42 10 -15 Ibs 10.00 Class A Somewhat Mineral Wool Absorber Inside Reflective 10 The Wall Journal May /Jun 1996 Issue No. 23 The Wall Journal May /Jun 1996 Issue No. 23 11 NOISE WALL MATERIALS COMPARISON MATRIX UPoATEo ASTM Materials Test Methods and Manufacturers' Submitted Test Results (Matrix, continued fronl page 11) the desi n i t I t I I I f resistance, reflectivity, etc. All of these physical properties are inter - related and therefore affect the overall characteristics of the material. These characteristics in turn affect the material selection process, since selection is usually based on environ- mental considerations and proposed use. Therefore, the new testing procedures I am recommending should be standardized so that it is easier to make a comparison between "apples and apples." Currently, it is particularly difficult from a design standpoint when choices have to be made between different noise wall materials, especially when different ASTM tests have been performed for each material and in some cases for the same material. Standardizing on a series of tests would make it easier for g e o se ec matena s sultan a or varying environ- mental conditions, ensuring that the materials tested have met or exceed a given set of reClUirements imposed by and accepted by the industry. If current tests are adapted, they should be refined so that the one sample blank is subject to a series of standardized tests. This change in testing procedure would replace the current procedure where individual blanks are submitted for each test. This modification to current pro- cedures would ensure that the physical properties of materials are not being modified to just to pass a particular test, whereas the material in its standard physical state and /or configuration would not be able to pass all of the tests nor do as well if that sample were subject to a battery of testing procedures. This recommended change in current testing procedures would also serve to more closely approximate normal environmental conditions. This analysis represents a continuing project which I will Update as new information becomes available and as new materials are developed and existing ones are further enhanced. If you are aware of a material which is not included in this survey, the availability of recent testing data or if the information included herein is inaccurate, please notify me at 412 281 -6393 or E -mail at 72411.2673 ©Compuserve.com. ■ Manufacturer Trade Name Wall Type NRC Test STC Test Freeze/Thaw Weatherability Compression IZOD Impact I Modulus of Elongation g Smoke Density Flame/Smoke I Horizontal Flash Point Self Ignition Density Specific Light Chemical Elasticity Burn Rate I Gravity Transmission Resistance Carsonite Intl. SBS System Reflect Yes ASTM D 695 ASTM D 638 60,000 psi 1 800,000 psi ASTM D 638 1.8 Concrete Placemt DuBrook Wall Absorp CDR TEC SOUND OFF Reflect ASTM E 90 -87 ASTM D 695 ASTM D 638 -89 ASTM 413 -87 500 psi 108,000 psi 31 CSI SOUNDTRAP Absorp ASTM C 423 -90A ASTM E 90 -90 ASTM 666 B/C 350 psi ASTM E 84 -94A SOUNDLOCK 1.0 for 3.5 ° 51 300/250 cycles No change Flame = 0 CYRO Industries ACRYLITE 237 Reflect ASTM E 90 -70 ASTM D 695 ASTM D 256 ASTM D 638 ASTM D 2843 Smoke = 0 ASTM D 635 ASTM D 792 32-34 12,900 psi 0.4 430,000 psi 75 0.45 1.19 DURISOL INTL DURISOL Absorp ASTM C 423 -84 A ASTM E 90 -75 ASTM C 672 -84 ASTM G 23 -81 0.95 for 3° 32 ASTM C 666 -84 2500 hours 0.75 for 2° 300 cycles A or B Empire Acoustical Silent Screen Absorp - "- Empire Acoustical Angle Lock Reflect Faddis Concrete FENCE -CRETE Reflect W. R. \Grace Sonotex 36 Absorp Hoover Wood PLYWALL Reflect Some Indust'I Acoustics NOISHIELD Absorp Indust'I Acoustics SOUNDCORE Absorp ASTM C 423 -84 A ASTM E 90 -80 ASTM C 666 -84 R Value ASTM E 84 -95 0.80 ASTM 413 -87 250 cycles 4 to 8 Flame = 4 Pickett Wall MonoWall Reflect 51 Smoke = 0 PPA Industries Landscaper Absorp Proudfoot Co. Sound Blox Absorp ASTM C 423 -90A 49-60 Reflect 0.65-0.80 Varies w/Blk width ' Varies w /Blk width Quilite Intl QUILITE Absorp/ ASTM C 423 ASTM D 638 ASTM D 638 ASTM D 2843 ASTM D 1925 ASTM D 672 ASTM D 1003 ANSI Z 26.1 Reflect 500 MHz = 0.64 12 -16 ft Ibrn nASTM 345,000 Ibs/sq in > 75 > 1000° F 1.2 89% - 1/8° Passes Sound Fighter LSE 1000/2000 Absorp SOUNDZERO SOUNDZERO Reflect ASTM 413 -73 33 SOUNDZERO SOUNDZERO Absorp ASTM C 423 -90A 40 cycles 2500 hours 10,000 cycles, 10 ton Type II, Class 1 650 - 800° F ASTM C 518 0.80 min. No change No change load, no change Passes 49.84 Ibs/cu ft Reinforced Earth FANWALL Reflect Timber Holdings Timbatech Absorp ASTM C 423 -90A Varies with Reflect 0.85-0.95 wood used 12 The Wall journal May /Jun 1996 Issue No. 23 The Wall Journal May /Jun 1996 Issue No. 23 13 APPENDIX D NOISE BARRIER COSTS FOR CORRIDORS TABLE D -1 Cost if Chain Link Fence is TH 100 CORRIDOR NOISE BARRIER SEGMENT COST (8 -FOOT WALL) Replaced * ** ($60/lineal foot) First Row Barrier 8 -ft. Wall or Cost / Lineal Houses Segment Berm* Length (Feet) Foot ** Cost Protected Cost 100 -A Wall 800 $80 $ 64,000 7 $ 48,000 100 -B Wall 450 $80 $ 36,000 3 $ 27,000 100 -C Berm 180 Varies NA 2 NA 100 -D Wall 180 $80 $ 14,400 2 $ 10,800 100 -E Berm 210 Varies NA 2 NA 100 -F Berm 825 Varies NA 5 NA 100 -G Wall 1620 $80 $ 129,600 9 $ 97,200 100 -H Wall 435 $80 $ 34,800 3 $ 26,100 100 -I Wall 1290 $80 .$ 103,200 6 $ 77,400 100 -J Wall 855 $80 $ 68,400 6 $ 51,300 100 -K Wall 1395 $80 $ 111,600 6 (and school) $ 83,700 100 -L Wall 2370 $80 $ 189,600 14 $ 142,200 100 -M Wall 810 $80 $ 64,800 5 $ 48,600 100 -N Wall 1350 $80 $ 108,000 8 $ 81,000 100 -0 Wall 1155 $80 $ 92,400 7 $ 69,300 100 -P Wall 990 $80 $ 79,200 7 $ 59,400 100 -Q Wall 660 $80 $ 52,800 6 $ 39,600 100 -R Wall Mn/DOT is constructing a Noise Wall at this Location. 100 -S Wall 1410 $80 $ 112,800 15 $ 84,600 TOTAL 16,985 $1,261,600 $ 946,200 Notes: * `Berm" implies landscaping or berming. ** All costs are approximate and exclude engineering design. * ** Based on the assumption that Mn/DOT would contribute $20 per lineal foot. TABLE D -2 Cost if Chain Link Fence is TH 100 CORRIDOR NOISE BARRIER SEGMENT COST (12 -FOOT WALL) Replaced" *($160/ lineal foot) First Row Barrier 12 -ft. Wall or Cost / Lineal Houses Segment Berm* Length (Feet) Foot ** Cost Protected Cost 100 -A Wall 800 $180 $ 144,000 7 $ 128,000 100 -B Wall 450 $180 $ 81,000 3 $ 72,000 100 -C Berm 180 Varies NA 2 NA 100 -D Wall 180 $180 $ 32,400 2 $ 28,800 100 -E Berm 210 Varies NA 2 NA 100 -F Berm 825 Varies NA 5 NA 100 -G Wall 1620 $180 $ 291,600 9 $ 259,200 100 -H Wall 435 $180 $ 78,300 3 $ 69,600 100 -I Wall 1290 $180 $ 232,200 6 $ 206,400 100 -J Wall 855 $180 $ 153,900 6 $ 136,800 100 -K Wall 1395 $180 $ 251,100 6 (and school) $ 223,200 100 -L Wall 2370 $180 $ 426,600 14 $ 379,200 100 -M Wall 810 $180 $ 145,800 5 $ 129,600 100 -N Wall 1350 $180 $ 243,000 8 $ 216,000 100 -0 Wall 1155 $180 $ 207,900 7 $ 184,800 100 -P Wall 990 $180 $ 178,200 7 $ 158,400 100 -Q Wall 660 $180 $ 118,800 6 $ 105,600 100 -R Wall MnMOT is constructing a Noise Wall at this Location 100 -S Wall 1410 $180 $ 253,800 15 $ 225,600 Total 16,985 $2,838,600 $2,523,200 Notes: * `Berm" implies landscaping or berming. ** All costs are approximate and exclude engineering design. * ** Based on the assumption that Mn/DOT would contribute $20 per lineal foot. TABLE D -3 Cost if Chain Link Fence is TH 169 CORRIDOR NOISE BARRIER SEGMENT COST (8 -FOOT WALL) Replaced * * *($6o /iineal foot) First Row Barrier 8 -ft. Wall or Cost / Lineal Cost Houses Segment Berm* Length (Feet) Foot ** Cost Protected Cost 169 -A Wall 2850 $80 $228,000 17 $171,000 169 -B Wall 650 $80 $52,000 5 $ 39,000 169 -C Wall 3600 $80 $288,000 13 $216,000 169 -D Berm 850 Varies NA 6 NA 169 -E Berm 250 Varies NA 2 NA 169 -F Wall 2000 $80 $160,000 6 $120,000 Total 10,200 $728,000 $546,000 TABLE D-4 Cost if Chain Link Fence is TH 169 CORRIDOR NOISE BARRIER SEGMENT COST (12- FT.WALL) Replaced * * *($16onineal food First Row Barrier 12 -ft. Wall or Cost / Lineal Houses Segment Berm* Length (Feet) Foot ** Cost Protected Cost 169 -A Wall 2850 $180 $ 513,000 17 $ 456,000 169 -B Wall 650 $180 $ 117,000 5 $ 104,000 169 -C Wall 3600 $180 $ 648,000 13 $ 576,000 169 -D Berm 850 Varies NA 6 NA 169 -E Berm 250 Varies NA 2 NA 169 -F Wall 2000 $180 $ 360,000 6 $ 320,000 Total 10,200 $1,638,000 $1,456,000 Notes: * "Berm" implies landscaping or berming. ** All costs are approximate and exclude engineering design. * ** Based on the assumption that Mn/DOT would contribute $20 per lineal foot. TABLE D -5 Cost if Chain Link Fence is TH 62 CORRIDOR NOISE BARRIER SEGMENT COST (8 -FOOT WALL) Replaced * * *($60 /lineal foot) First Row Barrier 8 -ft. Wall or Cost / Lineal Houses Segment Berm* Len h Feet Foot ** Cost Protected Cost 62 -A Wall/Berm 1100 $80 $ 88,000 6 $ 66,000 62 -B Berm 350 Varies NA 2 NA 62 -C Wall 1100 $80 $ 88,000 1 $ 66,000 62 -D Berm 400 Varies NA 4 NA 62 -E Wall 1000 $80 $ 80,000 7 $ 60,000 62 -F Wall 1800 $80 $ 144,000 14 $108,000 62 -G Wall 500 $80 $ 40,000 2 $ 30,000 62 -H Wall 1100 $80 $ 88,000 5 $ 66,000 62 -I Berm 350 Varies NA 3 NA 62 -J Wall 1300 $80 $ 104,000 3 $ 78,000 62 -K Wall 1400 $80 $ 112,000 8 $ 84,000 62 -L Berm 950 Varies NA 6 NA 62 -M Berm 800 Varies NA 5 NA 62 -N Berm 400 Varies NA 3 NA 62 -0 Wall 400 $80 $ 32,000 3 $ 24,000 62 -P Wall 1600 $80 $ 128,000 9 $ 96,000 62 -Q Berm 1100 Varies NA 6 NA 62 -R Wall/Berm 700 $80 $ 56,000 6 $ 42,000 62 -S Wall 550 $80 $ 44,000 3 $ 33,000 62 -T Wall 1150 $80 $ 92,000 6 $ 69,000 62 -U Wall 1300 $80 $ 104,000 7 $ 78,000 62 -V Berm 800 Varies NA 0 (Park) NA 62 -W Wall 850 1 $80 1 $ 68,000 1 6 1 $ 51,000 Total 21,000 1 1 $1,268,000 1 1 $951,000 * `Berm" implies landscaping or berming. ** All costs are approximate and exclude engineering design. * ** Based on the assumption that Mn/DOT would contribute $20 per lineal foot. TABLE D -6 Cost if Chain Link Fence is TH 62 CORRIDOR NOISE BARRIER SEGMENT COST (12 -FOOT WALL) Replaced * ** ($160 /lineal foot) First Row 8 -ft. Wall or Cost / Lineal Houses Barrier Segment Berm* Length (Feet) Foot ** Cost Protected Cost 62 -A Wall/Berm 1100 $180 $ 198,000 6 $ 176,000 62 -B Berm 350 Varies NA 2 NA 62 -C Wall 1100 $180 $ 198,000 1 $ 176,000 62 -D Berm 400 Varies NA 4 NA 62 -E Wall 1000 $180 $ 180,000 7 $ 160,000 62 -F Wall 1800 $180 $ 324,000 14 $ 288,000 62 -G Wall 500 $180 $ 90,000 2 $ 80,000 62 -H Wall 1100 $180 $ 198,000 5 $ 176,000 62 -I Berm 350 Varies NA 3 NA 62 -J Wall 1300 $180 $ 234,000 3 $ 208,000 62 -K Wall 1400 $180 $ 252,000 8 $ 224,000 62 -L Berm 950 Varies NA 6 NA 62 -M Berm 800 Varies NA 5 NA 62 -N Berm 400 Varies NA 3 NA 62 -0 Wall 400 $180 $ 72,000 3 $ 64,000 62 -P Wall 1600 $180 $ 288,000 9 $ 256,000 62 -Q Berm 1100 Varies NA 6 NA 62 -R Wall/Berm 700 $180 $ 126,000 6 $ 112,000 62 -S Wall 550 $180 $ 99,000 3 $ 88,000 62 -T Wall 1150 $180 $ 207,000 6 $ 184,000 62 -U Wall 1300 $180 $ 234,000 7 $ 208,000 62 -V Berm 800 Varies NA 0 (Park) NA 62 -W Wall 850 $180 $ 153,000 6 $ 136,000 Total 21,000 $2,853,000 $2,536,000 * "Berm" implies landscaping or berming. ** All costs are approximate and exclude engineering design. * ** Based on the assumption that Mn/DOT would contribute $20 per lineal foot. TABLE D -7 SUMMARY OF GRAND TOTAL COST ESTIMATES (ALL THREE CORRIDORS) Total Length of Potential Noise Total Cost if Chain Link Wall feet Cost Fence is Replaced 8 -Foot Wall 40,720 $3,257,600 $2,443,200 (8 -ft. wall) 12 -Foot Wall 40,720 $7,329,600 $6,515,200 (12 -ft. wall) * "Berm" implies landscaping or berming. ** All costs are annroximate and exclude engineering design. * ** Based on the assumption that Nln/DOT would contribute $20 per lineal foot. APPENDIX E BIBLIOGRAPHY Bibliography Edina Freeway Noise Mitigation Study Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, An Introduction to Sound Basics. Minnesota Department of Transportation, Legislative Report - Minnesota Highway Noise Abatement Study, February 1997. Minnesota Department of Transportation, Community Roadside Landscaping Partnership Pro rg am Application, January 1998. Minnesota Department, Guide to Minnesota's Transportation Revolving, Loan Fund, October 1998. Federal Highway Administration, Guidelines for the Prevention of Traffic Noise Problems, April 1985. Freunderich David R., Noise Wall Materials Comparison Matrix — Updated, The Wall Journal Issue 23, May, June 1996 pg. 10 -13. Texas Transportation Institute, Innovative Materials and Design of Soundwalls, Research Report 2968 -S, October 1997. Transportation Research and Development Bureau, Development of Standards for Noise Barriers Using Recycled- Plastic Lumber, November 1996. Heidenreich Wes, Oregon Department of Transportation, Recycled Plastics in Highway Construction and Maintenance, State Research Project Project #525. Breston Barbara E, The Impact of Road Traffic Noise on Property Values, McMaster University, September 1979. �TMetropolitan Council Working for the Region, Planning for the Future Regional Transit Master Plan Open House Schedule The 1999 legislature directed the Metropolitan Council to prepare a regional master plan for transit that must be submitted to the legislature on February 1, 2000. The plan includes balanced bus and rail development as well as bus, busway and-light rail transit investments to year 2020. A draft of this plan will be unveiled through a series of nine open houses designed to gather public comments. The Metropolitan Council encourages your participation at these open houses. Starting December 3, you may also view the plan at www.metrocouncil.org and comment via an interactive forum. ➢ Fridley City Hall 6431 University Ave. NE, Fridley Municipal Center Lobby Tuesday; December 7 4:30 -7:30 p.m. ➢ Maplewood Community Center 2100 White Bear Ave., Maplewood Room C Thursday, December 9 4:30 -7:30 p.m. ➢ Hennepin County Government Center 300S.6 1h St., Minneapolis Monday, December 13 11 a.m. -1 p.m. (Skyway Level) 5 -8 p.m. (Jury Assembly Room, Level A) ➢ Mears Park Centre 230 East 5`h St., St. Paul Thursday, December 16 11 a.m. -1 p.m. (1" Floor Lobby) 4:30 -7:30 p.m. (Room IA) ➢ Knollwood Mall Hwy. 7 & Blake Road, St. Louis Park Behind Center Stage (previously Sam Goody store) Tuesday, January 4 5 -8 p.m. ➢ Cottage Grove City Hall (TENTATIVE) 7516 S. 800' St., Cottage Grove Wednesday, January 5 6 -9 p.m. ➢ Burnsville Transit Hub 100 East Hwy. 13, Burnsville Thursday, January 6 4 -7 p.m.