HomeMy WebLinkAbout1998-02-17_COUNCIL PACKETMP P
MP PR
All Properties Inspected
18 Month Project
Estimated Cost: $400,000
City Ordinance
Staff Recommendations:
RAM
1. Implement Sump Program
2. Enact New Ordinance
AGENDA
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
FEBRUARY 17,1998
7.00 P.M.
ROLLCALL
ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the
Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda
items marked with an asterisk ( *) in bold print are Consent Agenda.items and are considered
routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items
unless a Commissioner, Council Member or citizen so requests it. In such cases the item will be
removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the Agenda.
* I.
Rollcall II.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES of HRA - Regular Meeting of February 2,1998
PAYMENT OF CLAIMS as per pre -list dated 2/11/98 TOTAL: $50,690.97
* III. CHANGE ORDER - HRA CONTRACT 97 -2 C.S. McCrossan, Centennial Lakes
Grading
IV. ADJOURNMENT
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of February 2, 1998 and Special
_ Meeting of February 2,1998
II. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS - Affidavits of Notice
by Clerk. Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing.
Zoning Ordinances: First and Second Reading require 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all
members of Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall of all
members of Council to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Pro erty Zoned
Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. Conditional Use Permit:
3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass.
Rollcall, A. FINAL REZONING. R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District to PRS-4, Planned Residence
District and Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Opus, National LLC and Karrington
Health Inc., 7128. France Avenue South (Lutheran Church of the Master Site
Rollcall B. FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN Guardian Savings, 6950 Xerxes Avenue
* C. SET PUBLIC HEARING (3/2/98) - Community Development Block Grant for 1998
III. AWARD OF BID
* A. Traffic Signals for 78th Street at Cahill Road and Ceceilia Circle
* B. Well Repair for 3 City Wells
Agenda/Edina City Council
February 17,1998
Page 2
IV. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS
* A. Approval of Traffic Safety Report of February 3,1998
* B. Resolution Authorizing 1998 Hennepin County Recycling Grant
C. Resolution Tobacco Free Community Grant
* D. Resolution Receiving Feasibility Reports and Setting Public Improvement
Hearing Dates (3/2,/98)-
1. France Avenue at Crosstown 62 Improvement
*
No. BA
2. West 77th Street at TH 100, Improvement No. BA -315
-316
E. Annual Bridge Inspection Report
F. MnDOT Cooperative Signal Agreement for Valley View Road
G. State Aid Variance Request for West 78th Street
and 169 Signal
H. State Aid Route Designations
I. City Sump Pump Program Report
*
J. Annual Appointment of Assistant Weed Inspector
K. Board of Soil & Water Resources Report
L. Confirm Edina School Board Appointments to Human
and the Edina Foundation
Relations Commission
M. Set Hearing Date - Street Vacation, 69th Street - Christ Presbyterian Chur
(3/16/98)
V.
COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS
VI.
CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS
VII.
INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES
VIII.
SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL
IX.
MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEM
X.
FINANCE
Rollcall
A. Payment of Claims as per Pre -List dated 2/11/98 TOTAL: $511,187.02 and for
Confirmation of Payment of Claims
$308,434.40 as per Pre -List
dated 2/3/98 TOTAL:
SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS
Mon
Mon
Mar 2 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M.
Mar 16 Regular Council Meeting
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Tues
7:00 P.M.
Mar 24 Annual Meet w /Brds, Commss & Commtts
COUNCIL
Mon
6:00 P.M.
Apr 6 Orientation -Board of Review
BRAEMAR GOLF CLUE
Mon
Apr 6 6:00 P.M.
p Regular Council Meeting
COUNCIL CHAMBET
Mon
7:00 P.M.
Apr 13 Board of Review
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Mon
Apr 20 Regular Council Meeting :00 P.M.
.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Mon
May 4 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Mon
May 18 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M.
g
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Mon
May 25 7:00 P.M.
Y MEMORIAL DAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
�9lNA • ,ilr�
�1
0
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CITY City of Edina
ENTER INTO A TOBACCO FREE COMMUNITIES
GRANT CONTRACT WITH
WITH THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
WHEREAS, the Edina City Council is the Community Health Board for the City of
Edina; and
WHEREAS, the Edina Community Health Board has been active in reducing tobacco
usage by youth in our community; and
WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Health is authorized by Minnesota Statutes
145.14, Subd. 3 to award special grants to community health boards to conduct community-
wide programs to prevent tobacco use; and
WHEREAS, the Edina Health Department has applied for a special grant for the
purpose of conducting community -wide programs to prevent tobacco use in the community of
Edina.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina Community Health Board that
the Community Health Administrator be authorized to enter into a contract with the Minnesota
Department of Health to accept funding for the Tobacco Free Communities for Children
Grant.
Adopted this 17`h day of February, 1998
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify
that the attached and foregoing City Council Minutes is a true correct copy of the Resolution
duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of February 17, 1998 and as
recorded in the minutes of said meeting.
WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this 18`h day of February, 1997
11 / / � J
Debra A. Mang n, City Clerk
City Hall (612) 927 -8861
4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 927 -7645
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 927 -5461
4,9t� r,4
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CITY
ENTER INTO 1998 MUNICIPAL RECYCLING
GRANT AGREEMENT WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY
City of Edina
WHEREAS, the City of Edina operates a recycling program consistent with
Minnesota Statutes 115A.02 and 115A.03, as amended by the Laws of Minnesota 1992,
Chapter, 685, and Minnesota Statutes, 473.8011; and
WHEREAS, the Edina Recycling Program is consistent with the Office of
Environmental Assistance Solid Waste Management Development Guide /Policy Plan, the
Hennepin County Solid Waste Master Plan; and Hennepin County's Residential Recycling
Funding Policy; and
WHEREAS, the Hennepin County Board has adopted a Resolution authorizing
funding for Municipal Recycling Programs.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Edina City Council that the Mayor
and the City Manager to enter into an Agreement with Hennepin County to accept funding
for the Edina Recycling Program.
Adopted this 17`h day of February, 1998
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby
certify that the attached and foregoing City Council Minutes is a true and correct copy of
the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of February
17th, 1998 and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting.
WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this 18`h -day of February, 1998
Debra A. Mang -en, C& Clerk
City Hall (612) 927 -8861
4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 927 -7645
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 927 -5461
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
HELD AT CITY HALL
FEBRUARY 2, 1998 - 7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL Answering rolicall were Commissioners Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold
and Chair Smith.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Maetzold
and seconded by Commissioner Hovland approving and adopting the HRA
Consent Agenda as presented.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold, Smith
Motion carried.
*HRA MINUTES OF JANUARY 20, 1998, APPROVED Motion made by
Commissioner Maetzold and seconded by Commissioner Hovland approving and
adopting the HRA Minutes of January 20, 1998.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
r CLAIMS PAID Commissioner Faust made a motion to approve payment of the
following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated January 27,
1998, and consisting of one page totaling $5,550.27. Commissioner Maetzold
seconded the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold, Smith
Motion carried.
There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, Chair Smith declared the meeting
adjourned.
Executive Director
F- -I
COUNCIL
CHEL. -�GISTER
11 8-1998 (18:54)
page 1
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT PO NUM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
13286
02/17/98
$49,922.02
GLOBAL SPECIALTY CONTRAC
PARKS
97 -4 #5
CENTENNIAL LAK
PARKS
< *>
$49,922.02*
13287
02/17/98
$10.50
Haas, Mary
Parking permit refund
801
50TH STREET
PARKING PERMIT
< *>
$10.50*
13288
02/17/98
$758.45
PLAISTED COMPANIES INC
Bunker sand
9359
CENTENNIAL LAK
PARKS
< *>
$758.45*
$50,690.97*
RE PO RURECO M MEN DATI O N
To: HRA
From: Francis Hoffma
City Engineer
Date: February 17, 1998
Subject: Contract 97- 2(HRA)
Centennial Lakes South Pond
Mass Grading - Change
Order
Recommendation: Approve change order.
Info /Background:
Agenda Item #
Consent
Information Only
Mgr. Recommends
Action
HRA III.
® To HRA
❑ To Council
® Motion
❑ Resolution
❑ Ordinance
❑ Discussion
Due to the impending construction of buildings 3 and 4 of the Centennial Lakes project, the
HRA needs to provide a change order to its current contractor, C.S. McCrossan, Inc. Currently,
McCrossan has a mass grading project which is to be completed on June 30, 1998. However,
due to the building schedules the grading must be completed in five stages prior to June 300'.
In order to do this, McCrossan has requested a change order in the amount of $5,000.00 for the
adjustment in the contract. Currently, change orders for a total of $8,579.67 have been
approved ,on a $99,300.00 contract. Thus, the ten percent limit will be exceeded with this latest
change order. This requires HRA approval. Staff would recommend the change order along
with the interim completion dates as part of the change order.
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
HELD AT CITY HALL
FEBRUARY 2,1998 - 7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold, and Mayor
Smith.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Maetzold and
seconded by Member Hovland to approve and adopt the Consent Agenda as presented
with the exception of Agenda Items IV.A. Resolution Authoring Acceptance of State Grant
Funding Police Overtime and IV.B. Tax Forfeit Property, Outlot B, Whiteman Addition.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold, Smith
Motion carried.
*MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF JANUARY 20, 1998, APPROVED Motion
made by Member Maetzold and seconded by Member Hovland approving the Minutes of
the Regular Meeting of the City Council on January 20,1998.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
PRELIMINARY REZONING AND PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVED FOR R -1 SINGLE
DWELLING UNIT DISTRICT TO PRD -3, PLANNED RESIDENCE DISTRICT FOR
NAMRON COMPANY LLC (51XX LINCOLN DRIVE), GENERALLY LOCATED EAST OF
LINCOLN DRIVE Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on
file.
Planner Larsen explained the subject site measures 5.1 acres in size, and is developed with a
single dwelling home located in the far north end of the site. The site is platted as an outlot
Properties to the west and south are zoned PRD -3 and are developed with apartment
buildings. Properties to the east are zoned PRD -2, and are developed with zero lot -line,
single dwelling homes. Properties to the north are double bungalow lots. The subject site is
shown as low density, multi- family in Edina's Comprehensive Plan.
Planner Larsen noted the proposed rezoning was continued by the Council at their January
20, 1998 meeting. The developer, in response to concerns raised by Council members, has
prepared a revised site plan for Council consideration. Planner Larsen reviewed the
following changes:
Density
The project unit count has been reduced to 39 units. The original site plan illustrated
eleven "B" units easterly of the proposed private drive. The revised plan illustrates
eight units in this area. Other changes to the site plan include the reduction of the "C"
units from fourteen to twelve and the increase of "D" units from four to six. The
revised site plan also eliminates the need for a building set back variance from the
north property line.
Minutes/Edina City Council/February 2,1998
Guest Parking
Guest parking has been increased from twelve to twenty spaces. Besides adding more
guest parking, demand has also been reduced through the reduced density and the
elimination of the community building. The revised site plan has a total of 176 parking
spaces on -site, including each unit's two car garage.
Site Grading
The developer has proposed reducing the maximum street grade from seven to five
percent. This reduction lowers the elevation of the entire site, increasing the vertical
separation between this site and the home to the east.
Street Width
The proposed private street continues at 24 feet wide. The street would be posted "No
Parking on either side.
Planner Larsen noted that along with the changes the developer included a' conceptual
landscaping plan emphasizing screening along the easterly property line..
Mayor Smith noted receipt of letters from Dr. F. E. Drill, 5080 Malibu Drive, Robin B. Nelson,
5180 Malibu, Drive and John & Evodena Linner, 5040 Malibu Drive expressing their concern
regarding the proposed development. The residents' concerns included density, traffic,
visual separation and proposed landscaping.
Mayor Smith stated his opinion that the proposed development as revised makes a good
transition zoning between the,apartments to the west and the single family homes to the east.
The developer, Mr. Bjornnes has addressed the concerns expressed at the January '20, 1998
meeting.
Member Hovland asked what controls the City has over the landscaping of a project such as
the proposed development. Planner Larsen explained that at the time the final approvals are
considered, the developer would submit a detailed landscaping plan that would be approved
by the City Council. In addition, the developer must provide a landscaping bond for the
project.
Member Faust asked what was the distance between the "B" units and the lot lines. Norm
Bjornnes, developer replied that the northerly building is 45 feet from the lot line increasing
to 50 feet from the lot line on the southerly building.
Norm Bjornnes, developer, informed the Council, his landscape architect is the same one
used by the developer of the zero lot line homes on Malibu. He added he intends to build the
scattered parking at this time.
Member Maetzold questioned whether the rental of units will be handled by the office at the
Lincoln. Mr. Bjornnes confirmed the Lincoln will handle rentals for the townhomes.
Page 2
Minutes/Edina City Council/February 2,1998
Member Faust thanked the developer for his efforts in responding to the concerns raised at
the January 20th Council meeting.
Member Kelly reiterated thanks to the developer for his willingness to resolve concerns.
Public Comment
Robert Crosby, 5020 Malibu Drive, explained he had two concerns relating to the proposed
development: 1) density, and 2) adequate landscaping between the existing single family
homes. Mr. Crosby believes the 39 -unit proposal is still too dense. He would also like to see
the existing trees salvaged between his home and the new development.
Member Hovland asked if subdivision dedication would be collected on this development.
Planner Larsen explained the subdivision dedication had been collected from this property at
an earlier time.
Motion by Member Maetzold, seconded by Member Hovland to grant first reading to
Ordinance No. 1998 -1, an ordinance rezoning the subject property from R -1, Single
Dwelling Unit District to PRD -3, Planned Residence District for Namron Company LLC.,
51XX Lincoln Drive.
Roll call:
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold, Smith
First Reading granted.
Member Hovland introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that
certain plat entitled, "OAKS LINCOLN TOWNHOME ", platted by Namron Company LLC
hereby granted preliminary plat approval with four conditions: 1) Final rezoning, 2) Final
Plat, 3) Watershed District Permits (noting final unit count may be reduced if on -site
ponding is required), and 4) Developer's Agreement for installation of sewer, water, and
improvements to Lincoln Drive. Member Maetzold seconded the motion.
Roll call:
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold, Smith
Resolution adopted.
Member Maetzold left the meeting at 7:50 P.M. due to illness.
-fit; DUNG DATE SET OF FEBRUARY 17 1998 FOR PLANNING MATTERS Motion
made by Member Maetzold and seconded by Member Hovland setting February 17, 1998,
as the hearing date for the following planning matters:
1. Final Rezoning, R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District to PRS-4, Planned Residence
District and Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Opus, National LLC and
Karrington Health Inc., 7128 France Avenue South (Lutheran Church of the
Master Site)
2. Final Development Plan, Guardian Savings, 6950 Xerxes Avenue.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes.
Page 3
Minutes/Edina City Council/February 2,1998
BID AWARDED FOR REPLACEMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT SELF - CONTAINED
BREATHING APPARATUS Chief Paulfranz explained of the four bids received for the
replacement self- contained breathing apparatus for the Fire Department, two manufacturers
met specifications. The Committee recommended awarding the bid to the lowest complying
bidder, Scott Fifty -Fifty at $92,657.72.
Following a brief Council discussion, Member Kelly made a motion for award of bid for
replacement Fire Department self - contained breathing apparatus to the lowest complying
bidder, Scott Fifty -Fifty at $92,657.72. Motion seconded by.. Member Faust.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Smith
Motion carried.
PARAGON CABLE'S OFFER ACCEPTED FOR EXPANSION OF GARDEN PARK
COMFORT STATION Park Director Keprios pointed out that Paragon Cable Company
approached the City with a proposal at Garden Park for the comfort station that included:
• adding 400 square feet to the 280 square foot proposed Garden Park Comfort
Station plan for a combined total square footage of 680
• $100,000 payment to the City of Edina
• Paragon paying all additional costs to increase the size of the building (to include
architect fees and construction costs)
• free rent for the life of the franchise or 14 years
• after 14 years, a new lease agreement would be negotiated or the City would
assume the storage space.
Following a brief Council discussion, Member Kelly made a motion.to accept Paragon Cable
Company's proposal to pay $100,000.00 plus all additional costs needed to enlarge the
comfort station at Garden Park which would allow. approximately 400 square feet of
secured storage for Paragon Cable Company's backup equipment. Member Faust seconded
the motion.
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Smith
Motion carried.
BID AWARDED FOR PARK SHELTER BUILDINGS AND COMFORT STATIONS
Director Keprios explained that the. purchase is for four park shelter buildings at Cornelia
School Park, Todd Park, Walnut Ridge Park and Weber Park and for three comfort stations at
Garden Park, Lake Cornelia Park and Wooddale Park, and for renovations of bathrooms at
the Lewis Park shelter building. In the interest of saving money,' plumbing and heating
fixtures will be bid separately with an anticipated cost at approximately $40,000.00.
Director Keprios concluded the specifications call for substantial completion of this project by
July 15, 1998, and final completion by July 30, 1998. He pointed out this would be the last
large Park Referendum project to be completed. Staff recommended approval of the low bid'.
Page 4
Minutes/Edina City Council/February 2,1998
Mayor Smith inquired whether consideration had been given to use of the Golden Years
Montessori School Building for both a park shelter as well as a Senior Center in the Weber
Park area. Manager Rosland noted discussion had been held on the feasibility of this use and
concluded the building is not for sale at this time. The business continues to operate even
though it has been sold. Mayor Smith asked if Hunnerberg Construction is awarded the bid
could they construct the Weber Park project last so more inquiries could be made into use of
the existing building. Manager Rosland assured the Council he would confer with
Hunnerberg Construction.
Member Faust made a motion for award of bid for park shelter buildings at Cornelia
School Park, Todd Park, Walnut Ridge Park, Weber Park and for comfort stations at
Garden Park, Lake Cornelia Park and Wooddale Park to recommended low bidder,
Hunnerberg Construction Company at $968,650.00. Member Hovland seconded the motion.
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Smith
Motion carried.
BID AWARDED FOR POLICE SQUAD CAR (FORD) Chief Bernhjelm indicated it is being
proposed the 1994 squad car scheduled for replacement would be replaced by one full -size
Ford Crown Victoria. The replacement vehicle would serve as a Class B marked squad for
four years.
Member Hovland made a motion for award of bid for one full -size Ford Crown Victoria to
Superior Ford under Hennepin County Cooperative Purchasing Contract, #4277A7, at
$20,443.00. Motion seconded by Member Faust.
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Smith
Motion carried.
BID AWARDED FOR POLICE SQUAD CARS (CHEVROLET) Chief Bernhjelm reported
three Police squads are up for replacing. He suggested replacements for these vehicles as
follows:
CHEVROLET TAHOE (1)
• Replacement Vehicle used as first line marked patrol vehicle for three years
• Truck chassis offers a 3 year life expectancy versus 2 years for full size squads
• Tahoe is only full -size police vehicle on market other than Ford Crown Victoria
• Crown Victoria may be discontinued within 2 years
• Tahoe would be test vehicle for possible future use as departments primary squad car
CHEVROLET LUMINAS (2)
• Replacement vehicles for unmarked fleet
• Will replace two 1991 unmarked squads
• Police package Luminas offer durability and performance for 7 year expected life span
Following a brief Council discussion, Member Faust made a motion for award of bid for
one Chevrolet Tahoe at $26,611.00, and two Chevrolet Luminas at $35,264.00, to Erickson
Chevrolet Pontiac, Inc., through Hennepin County Cooperative Purchasing Contract #4204
B7 -232. Member Kelly seconded the motion.
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Smith
Page 5
Minutes/Edina City Council/February 2,1998
Motion carried.
RESOLUTION ADOPTED AUTHORIZING GRANT FOR POLICE DEPARTMENT
OPERATION NIGHTCAP Chief Bernhjelm explained Operation NightCAP is a statewide
saturation patrol program designed to arrest drug and alcohol impaired drivers. State,
County and local law enforcement agencies work together on saturation events. Surrounding
agencies have selected two saturation events on Highway 62 with state funds paying for two
Edina officers at overtime rates.
Chief Bernhjelm noted the state requires a Council resolution authorizing City participation
before the Operation NightCAP grant request may be submitted to the state.
Member Faust introduced the following resolution and moved its approval:
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina Police Department enters into a Grant Contract
with the Minnesota Department of Public Safety, State Patrol Division for the program
entitled Operation NightCAP.
Deputy Chief Mike Siitari is hereby authorized to execute and sign such Grant
Contracts, and amendments thereto, as are necessary to implement the program on behalf
of the Edina Police Department.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina on February 2. 1998. Member
Hovland seconded the motion.
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Smith
Resolution adopted.
RESOLUTION APPROVING PUBLIC AUCTION OF TAX FORFEIT PROPERTY -
OUTLOT (WHITEMAN ADDITION) Manager Rosland informed the Council, the City has
been advised by Hennepin County Taxpayer Services Division that a small parcel of land in
Whiteman Addition has been forfeited due to nonpayment of property taxes. The City could:
1. Approve the parcel for sale at public auction;
2. Approve the auction of the parcel to adjacent property owners only; or
3. Request conveyance of the property to the City for public use.
Upon review, Staff believes the parcel was platted as an outlot to Whiteman Addition
because of a proposed driveway immediately north of the property. The property to the
north chose a different location for their driveway, never acquiring the outlot. A utility
easement exists on the outlot. The outlot is an unbuildable piece of property according to
Code and not needed for any public purpose. Staff believes the best option for the outlot
would be to allow its sale at public auction, restricting the sale to adjacent property owners.
The Mayor called for public comment. No public comments were heard.
Member Kelly introduced the following resolution and moved its approval:
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Edina has received from the County of
Hennepin a list of lands in said municipality which became the property of the State of
Page 6
Minutes/Edina City Council/February 2,1998
Minnesota for non - payment of property taxes, which said list was dated December 23,
1997, Conservation/Non- Conservation Classification List 1027- C,/NC.
WHEREAS, the parcel in said list identified as PIN No. 29- 117 -21 -33 -0034 has
heretofore been classified by the Board of County Commissioners of Hennepin County,
Minnesota, as non - conservation land the sale thereof and has heretofore been authorized
by said Board of County Commissioners; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined by the Edina City Council that there are no
existing or pending special assessments on said parcel; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined by the Edina City Council that said parcel need
not be withheld from sale pursuant to M.S. 85.012, M.S. 92.461; M.S. 282.01, Subd. 8; M.S.
282.018, Subd. 1, or M.S. 282.018, Subd. 2;
NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Edina City Council that the said
classification is hereby approved.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Edina City Council that, acting pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes 282.01, Subd. 7a, it has determined that said parcel of land is not
buildable according to the City's Zoning Ordinance and that sale of said parcel be limited
to the adjacent properties for attachment thereto.
Adopted this 2nd day of February, 1998.
Member Faust seconded the motion.
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Smith
Resolution adopted.
DISCIPLINARY ACTION APPEAL REMOVED FROM AGENDA At the request of the
employee concerned, the disciplinary appeal was removed from the agenda prior to the
Council meeting.
CLAIMS PAID Member Kelly made a motion to approve payment of the following claims
as shown in detail on the Check Register dated January 27, 1998, and consisting of 27
pages: General Fund $262,703.24; C.D.B.G. $140.50; Communications $427.21; Working
Capital $30,911.34; Art Center $10,883.87, Golf Dome Fund $339.98; Swimming Pool Fund
$106.35; Golf Course Fund $16,778.52; Ice Arena Fund $13,337.80, Edinborough/Centennial
Lakes $8,346.10; Utility Fund $322,432.60; Storm Sewer Utility Fund $10,820.10; Liquor
Dispensary Fund $163,263.01; Construction Fund $12,199.76, Park Bond Fund $130,223.30;1-
494 Commission $2,653.09; TOTAL $985,566.77. Member Faust seconded the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Smith
Motion carried.
There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Smith declared the meeting
adjourned at 8:40 P.M.
City Clerk
Page 7
MINUTES
OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL AND'
THE EDINA SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD
HELD AT CITY HALL
FEBRUARY 2, 1998 - 5:00 P.M.
Mayor Pro Tem Maetzold called the meeting to order.
Attending from the City Council were. Members Nan Faust, Mike Kelly, James Hovland and
Mayor Pro Tem Dennis Maetzold. Attending from the Edina School District Board were:
Members Idith Almog, Ernie Fischer, Ruth Gouth, Phyllis Koehler, .John Murrin, .Tim Walsh,
and Chair Frank Bennett. Mayor Smith entered the meeting at 5:07 p.m.
Mayor Pro Tem Maetzold thanked the School Board members for their attendance. He briefly
reviewed the purpose of the meeting which was to review the status of the Kunz/ Lewis
property with the School Board, to gather further information regarding the West Metropolitan
Education Program (WMEP) proposals, and discuss the School Board's position regarding the
WMEP proposals for the Kunz/ Lewis site.
Assistant Manager Hughes explained the Grandview Area Tax Increment Financing District
was originally created in 1984. Various proposed developments have been reviewed for the site
commonly called the Kunz /Lewis property since 1984. An office development was approved in
1992, but never built and the approvals expired. In 1996 Four S Properties acquired the site, then
February of 1997 the Edina City Council authorized the acquisition of the site through
condemnation, if necessary. However, the City was able to reach a negotiated settlement with
the owners. The City solicited requests for proposals from developers which were received on
December 5, 1997. Thirteen proposals were received, two that proposed construction of a
magnet school on the site and eleven for mixed purpose redevelopment.
Superintendent Dragseth explained that WMEP is a consortium of school districts, from
Columbia Heights, St. Anthony, Brooklyn Center, Robbinsdale, St. Louis Park, Hopkins, Edina,
Minneapolis and Richfield. WMEP has been in existence about seven years and is an attempt to .,
voluntarily develop projects increasing integration in Minneapolis and surrounding suburban
schools.
WMEP currently has three projects under way. The first is an elementary school in downtown
Minneapolis that is scheduled for completion in about a year, but which will open for students
in the 3rd through 8th grades in the Fall of 1998. The second magnet school is located in
Robbinsdale and will be a fine arts school. Since the two projects under construction were in
downtown Minneapolis and a northern suburb, the south west was the next area targeted for a
magnet school. The Kunz /Lewis site met WMEP's selection criteria.
WMEP has secured State site acquisition funding of $1.8 million and is requesting an additional
$1.2 million in 1998. The State will also fund construction of the magnet school that is estimated
to be $12 million. If the magnet school is constructed in Edina, District 273 then becomes its
Minutes/Edina City Council/February 2,1998
fiscal manager and has authority over programming the facility. Students from the nine
participating districts are allocated spots in the magnet schools based proportionally upon
population.
Superintendent Dragseth noted that WMEP is the only voluntary organization in the United
States attempting to integrate urban and suburban schools.
The City Council and School Board discussed various aspects of the WMEP proposal including:
• The possible programs a magnet school could provide,
• The need for additional elementary facilities in Edina,
• The number of enrollment slots available to Edina students,.
• How magnet school attendance opportunities are apportioned,
• The impact on Edina if the Kunz /Lewis property becomes tax exempt,
• Whether or not a magnet school could or would meet any community needs (additional
gym space, community indoor pool, theater, senior center), and
• The variety of proposals the City has received for the Kunz /Lewis. property.
Mayor Smith requested the School Board draft a resolution outlining the District's position and
forward this resolution to the City Council as soon as possible.
There being no further business on the Council/ School Board agenda the Mayor declared the
meeting adjourned.
City Clerk
Page 2
IREPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Craig Larsen
City Planner
Date: February 17, 1998
Subject: Z -97-4, and Amendment to
Comprehensive Plan.
7128 France Avenue.
Karrington Health, Inc.
Recommendation:
Agenda Item II. A.
Consent
Information Only
Mgr. Recommends ❑
To HRA
- ®
To Council
Action F-1
Motion
®
Resolution
®
Ordinance
Fj
Discussion
The Planning Commission recommends Final Rezoning approval and
Amendment of the Comprehensive Plan from Quasi - Public to Multi - Family Residential.
Conditioned on:
1. Grant 50 foot conservation restriction along westerly property line.
Info /Background:
See attached Planning Commission minutes, staff report and plans, and
correspondence.
DRAFT MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD ON
WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 28, 1998.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Runyan, Bergman, Byron, Workinger, McClelland,
Lonsbury
Z -97-4 Rezoning R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District to PSR-4, Planned
Residence District
Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan
Generally
Located: West of France Avenue and south of Hazelton Road
Mr. Larsen informed the Commission the City Council granted Preliminary
Rezoning approval for the proposed development on November 17, 1997. At the
same time the Council gave preliminary approval to a Comprehensive Plan
amendment changing the land use designation for the site from Quasi - Public to
Multi- family Residential. The proponents have now prepared plans in support of
their request for Final Rezoning approval.
Mr. Larsen pointed out in addition to the normal requirements for Final
Rezoning, the Council identified six issues to be addressed and resolved before
the granting of final approval.
Continuing, Mr. Larsen explained at the time of preliminary approval the
developers indicated they would accept a no -build easement along the westerly
portion of the site. The size of the easement was not specified. The westerly
parking lot maintains a 90 foot setback in the final site plan. Staff would suggest
a 50 foot conservation easement along the westerly property line.
Mr. Larsen informed the Commission during City Council hearings both
the height of the berm and the amount of berming along the westerly property
line were issues. The plan considered by the Council had a pond in the
northwesterly portion of the site, and berming extending from the southerly end
of the pond to the south property line. The final plan illustrates a berm along the
- entire west side of the property. The proposed undulating berm varies between
3 and 5 feet above the grade of the parking lot. The berm is heavily landscaped,
primarily with conifers.
Mr. Larsen pointed out the pond with permanent standing water has been
eliminated. In its place a dry storm water detention pond is developed in the
northwesterly portion of the site. The pond is sized to handle the 100 year
storm, but would only have standing water during and shortly after significant
rainfall events. Nine Mile Creek Watershed District has granted all necessary
permits for the development.
Mr. Larsen asked the Commission to note the developer has agreed to
install sidewalks along West 72 "d Street and Hazleton Road to connect to the
existing sidewalk on France Avenue. There has been some discussion of a
sidewalk along Lynmar with neighbors. Staff does not recommend this sidewalk
if the two other sections are installed. The site plan continues to provide for site
access only from Hazleton Road. To further orient traffic to France Avenue the
westerly drive has been angled to the northeast.
Mr. Larsen concluded the developer has presented plans which meet the
requirements for Final Rezoning approval, and which address the issues and
concerns raised at Preliminary Rezoning approval. Staff recommends Final
Rezoning approval, and approval of the Comprehensive Plan amendment.
Approval should be conditioned on the granting of a 50 foot Conservation
Easement along the westerly property line.
Mr. Michael Concilla, Mr. Cease, Mr. Hurst and Ms. Trott were present
representing Karrington, Inc.
Commissioner Workinger questioned why the sidewalk does not extend
along Lynmar Lane. Mr. Larsen said the City prefers that the sidewalk does not
extend along Lynmar Lane. The sidewalks constructed by the proponent along
West 72 "d Street and Hazelton Road link with France Avenue so a sidewalk
along Lynmar is not really needed.
Mr. Mike Concilla, introduced himself, and explained to the Commission
the development team is working with their attorney's on the language regarding
the conservation easement. He introduced the development team; Mr. Tom
Cease, Gene Hurst and Ms. Carla Trott. Continuing, Mr. Concilla stated
Opus /Karrington does not have a problem with the 50 foot conservation
"easement ", but the attorney /lender is experiencing hesitation with the wording.
Mr. Mark Sullivan, 7128 Lynmar Lane, told Commission Members the
neighborhood has experienced a very positive relationship with Karrington /Opus.
.Continuing, Mr. Sullivan stated the neighborhood believes the proposed plan is
very good, but the neighborhood wants assurance the requested 50 foot
conservation easement stays in place. Mr. Sullivan said the neighborhood is not
worried about Karrington, but has a concern if the facility is sold, what the new
owners may do regarding the easement.
Commissioner Byron commented if he understands the main concern of
the neighboring residents, that concern is maintaining the 50 foot conservation
easement. Mr. Sullivan said that is correct. Continuing, Commissioner Byron
questioned how members of the neighborhood feel about extending the sidewalk
to include the east side of Lynmar Lane. Mr. Sullivan said in all honesty, the
residents on Lynmar Lane do not want to see the sidewalk constructed across
from them, but there is a faction of neighbors that desire the sidewalk.
Mr. Larsen interjected in response to questions raised about the
conservation easement, the City wants to see this easement in place, and legally
recorded. In conversations with the proponents they divulged the lender is
uncomfortable with the word "easement ". Continuing, Mr. Larsen said he would
like the motion to reflect a 50 foot "restriction ", "easement" , "no build area ", etc.,
or whatever wording the Commission chooses to ensure that this area remains
open. Mr. Larsen said the lender needs to realize this protection is needed, but
does not prevent them from asking in the future for it to be reduced. Concluding,
Mr. Larsen stressed the City wants the "restriction" because if offers the City
another layer of protection.
Commissioner McClelland said in her opinion this is a good project, the
developers have been very responsive to the concerns of the residents, and
City, adding she would hate to see all the past hard work unravel because of
language issues.
Commissioner Byron said the City and City Attorney would probably like to
see the word "easement ", but as Mr. Larsen mentioned another word may
suffice.
Commissioner Workinger suggested platting this area as an "Outlot" may
solve the financing problem with the language issue. Mr. Larsen said he
believes that would only complicate the issue.
Chairman Runyan said it has been very gratifying to see such a respectful
relationship between a neighborhood and developer, and he can support the
proposal as presented.
Mr. Rofidahl, 7101 Bristol Boulevard, stated he does not care either way
if the sidewalk is constructed along Lynmar Lane, but believes it is important to
_.maintain the 50 foot strip of open space.
Ms. Diane Marteens, resident of the neighborhood, said she is very
pleased with the developers of the project, the planned sidewalk, and suggested
that the City look into extending the sidewalk along West 72nd Street, all the way
to Cornelia Drive.
Ms. Kathy Campbell, 7201 Bristol Circle, stated she agrees with what has
been discussed this evening, but added she has a concern with vehicular
parking congestion, and suggested widening Hazelton Road to provide safety for
vehicles traveling along it when the funeral home is conducting a funeral. Ms.
Campbell pointed out she submitted photos of cars parking along Hazelton
Road, and Lynmar Lane, during a funeral, stating in her opinion parking has
become a problem.
Commissioner Workinger asked Mr. Larsen to address the parking issue.
Mr. Larsen said he will look into the situation, but pointed out the project
presented this evening can not remedy the parking, and traffic that occur as a
result of a funeral. Mr. Larsen pointed out the funeral home conforms to all Code
requirements, and at this time Traffic Safety is reviewing the situation.
Commissioner Workinger said he has a concern if funeral overflow occurs
on Hazelton Road the site lines for vehicles leaving the subject site may be
compromised. Commissioner McClelland suggesting posting "No Parking" signs
or a yellow curb line near the entrance /exit curb cuts of the facility.
Chairman Runyan explained to Ms. Campbell the Commission is not in
the position to recommend the widening of Hazelton Road, but the Council will
review the comments this evening, and can decide on the appropriate action.
Commissioner Byron asked Mr. Larsen if staff is content with the storm -
water run -off solution depicted in the plans. Mr. Larsen said what is proposed
should work, pointing out the site will also tie into the Centennial Lakes drainage
system.
Commissioner McClelland moved to recommend Final Rezoning and
Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan subject to staff conditions, and the
recommendation that a 50 foot conservation "easement" be placed along the
westerly property boundary line, not restricted to the word "easement ".
Commissioner Bergman seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried.
Commissioner Byron added he would like the Council to consider
extending the proposed sidewalks to include Lynmar Lane.
EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
JANUARY 28, 1998
Z -97-4 Rezoning R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District to PSR-4, Planned
Residence District
Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan
Generally
Located: West of France Avenue and south of Hazelton Road
The City Council granted Preliminary Rezoning approval for the proposed
development on November 17, 1997. At the same time the Council gave
preliminary approval to a Comprehensive Plan amendment changing the land
use designation for the site from Quasi - Public to Multi- family Residential. The
proponents have now prepared plans in support of their request for Final
Rezoning approval.
In addition to the normal requirements for Final Rezoning, the Council
identified six issues to be addressed and resolved before the granting of final
approval. The issues are as follows:
Conservation Easement
At the time of preliminary approval the developers indicated they would
accept a no -build easement along the westerly portion of the site. The size of
the easement was not specified. The westerly parking lot maintains a 90 foot
setback in the final site plan. Staff would suggest a 50 foot conservation
easement along the westerly property line.
Height of Berm
During City Council hearings both the height of the berm and the amount
of berming along the westerly property line were issues. The plan considered by
the Council had a pond in the northwesterly portion of the site, and berming
extending from the southerly end of the pond to the south property line. The final
plan illustrates a berm along the entire west side of the property. The proposed
undulating berm varies between 3 and 5 feet above the grade of the parking lot.
The berm is heavily landscaped, primarily with conifers.
Pond Location
The pond with permanent standing water has been eliminated. In its
place a dry storm water detention pond is developed in the northwesterly portion
of the site. The pond is sized to handle the 100 year storm, but would only have
standing water during and shortly after significant rainfall events. Nine Mile
Creek Watershed District has granted all necessary permits for the development.
Traffic Safety
The developer has agreed to install sidewalks along West 72 1'd Street and
Hazleton Road to connect to the existing sidewalk on France Avenue. There
has been some discussion of a sidewalk along Lynmar with neighbors. Staff
does not recommend this sidewalk if the two other sections are installed. The
site plan continues to provide for site access only from Hazleton Road. To
further orient traffic to France Avenue the westerly drive has been angled to the
northeast.
Location and Screening of Service Area
The service doors continue to be located in the northwesterly wing of the
building. The doors are screened from the west by the building.
Lighting
Final plans include a lighting plan which demonstrates that lighting will be
directed only to parking areas and will not wash to neighboring properties. The
impact of parking lot lighting will be further reduced because the parking lot has
be moved 30 feet to the east in the final plans.
In addition to addressing issues raised by the City Council, the developer
has submitted a complete set of plans to support their request for final approval.
The plans continue to illustrate a 93 unit building, but over all building size has
been reduced. As a result the building and the westerly parking lot have moved
approximately 30 feet to the east. The 3 story building will be finished with a
combination of face brick and lap siding. The landscaping plan meets or
exceeds ordinance requirements, while emphasizing screening along Lynmar.
RECOMMENDATION
The developer has presented plans which meet the requirements for Final
rezoning approval, and which address the issues and concerns raised at
preliminary approval. Staff recommends Final Rezoning approval, and approval
of the Comprehensive Plan amendment. Approval should be conditioned on the
granting of a 50 foot Conservation Easement along the westerly property line.
Minutes/Edina City Council/November 17,1997
considered to be four feet above the ground. Using this as a guide, approximately 483 trees are larger
than 12 inches in diameter, and 435 are less than 12 inches in diameter. The estimated cost per
homeowner is $60 per tree trimmed. Homeowners are given an opportunity to trim their own trees
before the City contractor begins work.
Member Maetzold questioned whether the City pays sales tax on other improvement projects. Staff
explained the City pays sales tax on all purchases of goods and service.
Member Hovland asked if the City has a plan to control Dutch Elm. Manager Rosland explained that
over the years a variety of treatment methods have been used. Sanitization seems to work best.
Public Comment
William Orr, 4920 Arden Avenue, explained he lives on a corner lot at Arden Avenue and 50th Street.
Mr. Orr is not anxious to pay assessments for trimming trees on both Arden Avenue and 50th Street.
He asked that he only be required to pay for tree trimming on one street, noting this is how street or
sidewalk assessments are handled.
Ann Macieg, 4630 Bruce Avenue, stated she has lived on Bruce for 25 years. MS. Macieg believes
treating the trees has helped immensely over the years. Ms. Macieg is very concerned about the
cleanliness of the trees and urged that proper trimming be done. She asked that young trees be
included in the trimming process.
Manager Rosland noted the City Forester is on the lookout for diseased elms; however, citizens are
urged to call if they suspect a diseased tree. The City will send the Forester to inspect the tree.
Member Maetzold asked about the City's policy of assessing corner properties for all their trees.
Manager Rosland explained the project is an area improvement; therefore, each lot is assessed for all
trees on public boulevards. Mayor Smith added trees benefit individual home owners' property
exclusively, while streets and sidewalks are used by the general public.
Member Hovland introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION ORDERING TREE TRIMMING IMPROVEMENT NO. TT-98
WHEREAS, the Edina City Council on the third of November, 1997, fixed a date for a
council hearing on the proposed tree trimming Improvement No. TT-98 and
WHEREAS, ten days' mailed notice and two weeks' published notice of the hearing were
given, and the hearing was held thereon on the 17th of November 1997, for Improvement No. TT-
98 Tree Trimming.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Council has duly considered the views of
all persons interested, and being fully advised of the pertinent facts, does hereby determine to
proceed with said improvement, including all proceedings which may be necessary in eminent
domain for the acquisition of necessary easements and rights hereby designated and shall be
referred to in all subsequent proceedings as Improvement No. TT-98 Tree Trimming.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Improvement No. TT-98 Tree Trimming is hereby
ordered. Member Kelly seconded the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold, Smith
Resolution adopted.
PRELIMINARY REZONING, R -1, SINGLE DWELLING UNIT DISTRICT TO PSR-4 PLANNED
`- RESIDENCE DISTRICT AND AMENDING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, OPUS, NATIONAL
Page 2
Minutes/Edina City Council/November 17, 1997
LLC AND KARRINGTON HEALTH, INC., 7128 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH Affidavits of Notice
were presented, approved and ordered placed on file.
Presentation by Planner
Planner Larsen explained the City has received a redevelopment request from Opus, National LLC
and Karrington Health Inc. for the site of the former Lutheran Church of the Master. The subject
property is 4.18 acres in area and developed as a church. The church ceased operating during the
summer of 1997. The proposed rezoning would allow redevelopment of the site as a senior citizen
assisted living residence. The proposed development would also require amending the City's
Comprehensive Plan use designation for the site from Single Family Residential to Multi- family
Residential.
The proposed rezoning would allow development of the site with a three -story assisted living senior
citizens residence containing 93 units. Planner Larsen reviewed the proposal relative to Edina's
Zoning Code as follows:
• Density: PSR-4 District requires an area of 1,500 square feet per dwelling unit. The
proposed 93 unit building would provide 1,957 square feet per unit.
• Building Setbacks: PSR- 4District building setbacks are 35 feet or the height of the building
from all property lines. The proposed building is 40 feet 10 inches with proposed setbacks
of between 70 and 130 feet.
• Surface parking: Accessed from Hazelton Road only for approximately 55 spaces which
would adequately handle traffic. Based on other operations of the proponent, their peak
parking demand will be during the day shift with 28 staff on site.
• Landscaping Plans (not required for Preliminary Approvals): proposes to retain as many
France Avenue trees as possible. Emphasis will be placed on screening the west side of
the site.
Planner Larsen compared the Walker Elder Suites to the proposal:
Planner Larsen noted the proponent revised the site plan after the Planning Commission review as
follows:
• The building was moved east and south to minimum setback,
• Parking slightly rearranged,
• Pond moved from the south side to the site low point on the north west corner,
• Additional emphasis placed on the berm west and north west portion of side.
Mayor Smith asked the height of the berm on the west side of the site and whether this proposal
would require a Developers Agreement. Planner Larsen responded that a Developers Agreement
would govern the development.
Member Kelly asked why the pond had been relocated in the revised plan. Planner Larsen replied
the new location on the northwest corner is the lowest point on the site.
Member Maetzold asked what was meant in the Planning Commission minutes when it stated if the
proposed building height was reduced the project would loose its residential feel. Planner Larsen
Page 3
Walker
Karrington
Area
1.87 acres
4.18 acres
No. Units
72
93
Heights
40 feet halfway up to peak
40 feet 10 inches
Lot Coverage
22%
12%
Parking
37
55
Planner Larsen noted the proponent revised the site plan after the Planning Commission review as
follows:
• The building was moved east and south to minimum setback,
• Parking slightly rearranged,
• Pond moved from the south side to the site low point on the north west corner,
• Additional emphasis placed on the berm west and north west portion of side.
Mayor Smith asked the height of the berm on the west side of the site and whether this proposal
would require a Developers Agreement. Planner Larsen responded that a Developers Agreement
would govern the development.
Member Kelly asked why the pond had been relocated in the revised plan. Planner Larsen replied
the new location on the northwest corner is the lowest point on the site.
Member Maetzold asked what was meant in the Planning Commission minutes when it stated if the
proposed building height was reduced the project would loose its residential feel. Planner Larsen
Page 3
Minutes/Edina City Council/November 17,1997
said there had been discussion about lowering the base elevation or having two stories. Two stories
would result in 50% more ground cover making parking crowded and leaving less open space. He
added that single family homes are allowed to have a maximum height of 30 feet measured at the
mid -point between the roof peak and eaves.
Member Maetzold asked how parking would be kept out of the oval drive in front of the building.
Planner Larsen explained that due to the width of the oval, parking would be allowed within it.
Member Hovland asked if the berm is planned to rise 4-5 feet above the parking lot grade or the
adjacent land, if the west side of the pond will have 4 -5 foot banks, whether homes exist the entire
length of Lynmar Lane adjacent to the site, has any work been done to ensure lighting from the
parking lot does not wash into the residential homes and whether watershed approval has been
obtained yet.
Mayor Smith expressed concern that necessary drainage be provided considering the additional hard
surface being created.
Planner Larsen introduced Julie Kimble of Opus to respond to Council's questions.
Julie Kimble, Opus, explained they are partnering with Karrington Health Inc. She introduced Mike
Concilla of Karrington Health, Inc. Ms. Kimble explained the new pond location was based on the
natural topography of the site. The new location also reduced the retaining wall. The developer has
been working with the Lynmar Lane residents regarding the berm and landscaping. Ms. Kimble
noted the berm is undulating and the landscaping should screen the west side of the pond.
Mike Concilla, Karrington Health Inc., noted the lights proposed are hooded on the back and are
residential in nature. The light bulbs are not high pressure sodium, but are a lower intensity light.
Mayor Smith stated the pond at its typical low state should be attractive and be designed with an
adequate bounce to hand all storm water. In addition, the trash/ service area should be reconfigured
to provide additional screening and more noise buffering.
Member Kelly said he believes the proposed screening on Lynmar Lane should extend the entire
length of the site, and he wants to see impact on the single family homes minimized. In addition, he
expressed concern regarding the safety of the pond at its proposed location and questioned the
aesthetic integrity of the site plan.
Julie Kimble, Opus, responded that pond's proposed location takes advantage of the low point of the
site, and that the pond is required for storm water management. She added the developer had been
informed the neighborhood children walk on the 72.d Street side of the site; so, moving the pond to
the northwest comer seemed appropriate.
Member Maetzold questioned the outside mechanical systems' location.
Mike Concilla, Karrington Health, Inc., explained the exterior mechanical systems are screened
behind the roof facade on top of the building. Mr. Concilla added Karrington operates 24 assisted
living•facilities currently, has 20 under construction and an additional 18 in the planning process. He
explained the building design affords each wing to contain a different neighborhood. Each
neighborhood will contain common areas for beauty parlor, craft areas, outdoor areas, dining
facilities, etc. The proposed building will have 93 units with 111 beds, allowing shared rooms for
married couples or others. Mr. Concilla noted there are no kitchen facilities in the rooms. Residents
Page 4
Minutes/Edina City Council/November 17,1997
may need help bathing, dressing or eating. The average resident is an 83 -year old female needing
minimal assistance. One wing will be reserved for Alzheimer's patients.
Member Maetzold asked about security of the Alzheimer's patients because of the proximity to
France Avenue. Mr. Concilla explained the Alzheimer's wing has locked doors with keypad exits
and patients wear bracelets.
Member Hovland urged that coniferous trees be included in the landscaping plan and expressed
concern about the adequacy of the parking, especially during holidays when residents may receive
many visitors. Mr. Concilla responded in his experience the proposed parking should be more than
adequate.
Public Comment
Mark Sullivan, 7128 Lynmar Lane, lives west of the Lutheran Church of the Master site. Mr. Sullivan
bought his home eight years ago believing he would live forever next door to a church. He stated he
is representing the Cornelia neighborhood, and they prefer the present proposal over the office
development that previously was suggested for the site. Mr. Sullivan noted that Opus has returned
phone calls, held neighborhood meetings and is working with the neighborhood to alleviate concern.
He added the neighborhood is almost ready to support the proposal but have the following concerns:
1. The 40 feet 10 inch building height,
2. Limits must be placed on the site not allowing any future expansion, with either additional
wings or floors,
3. Increase the easement to the single family property adjoining the site to limit impact on the
homes,
4. Assurance that the berm will be satisfactorily landscaped,
5. Ensure protection from lights washing into the residential homes,
Mr. Sullivan added the developers' tight time schedule should not become either the neighborhood's
or City's problem. He expressed concern that final approval not be granted until all parties are
satisfied.
Pat Evans, 7111 Heatherton Trail, voiced concern regarding the proposed pond and the many
children in the area. The pond will become a very attractive nuisance. Ms. Evans requested the pond
be relocated. She also requested that care be taken the pond does not become a stagnate place to
breed mosquitoes.
Diane Martin, 7112 Bristol Boulevard, added her concern regarding safety and noted the comer of
Lynmar and Hazelton currently becomes inundated with water. Ms. Martin worried about the impact
of additional water and a pond in this area.
Kathy Campbell, 7201 Bristol Circle, reiterated concern about the pond's proposed location and the
safety issue of the pond. Ms. Campbell also noted concern relative to -the amount of traffic on the
corner of Hazelton and France. Ms. Campbell cautioned approval of the proposal because she
believes the proposal has too many missing pieces. She suggested redesigning the building.
Rick Adair, 7120 Lynmar Lane, reported the neighbors have not achieved a consensus for the pond's
location. He stated he would prefer to see the building site further east to lessen its impact on the
neighborhood.
Council Discussion/ Action
Page 5
Minutes/Edina City Council/November 17,1997
Mayor Smith noted the neighbors' request for a conservation restriction along Lynmar Lane,
problems with the pond location and design, and desire that the service area be moved nearer to
France Avenue.
Member Maetzold expressed concern over the proposed height of the structure.
Member Kelly stated he believes the proposed pond design is not very creative and is a safety
concern. Member Kelly suggested Opus rework the pond area and turn it into an aesthetically
pleasing amenity for the site.
Julie Kimble thanked the Council and neighbors for their comments. She stated the "no- build"
easement would not be a problem. Mr. Kimble reminded this is a concept plan, that neighbors still
have input and the plan will be refined before it is finalized.
Member Hovland complimented the developer for the quality of the proposed project. The City
wants the best outcome for the neighbors and the developers. He asked if the Council moves ahead
with preliminary approval can the City procedurally require the developers to come back with
detailed plans.
Planner Larsen explained the preliminary plan is more detailed than required by Edina's ordinance.
Planner Larsen listed the following issues to be resolved before final approvals:
• Conservation restriction on west side of site,
• Height of berm
• Pond location, safety and aesthetics
• Traffic safety
• Location and screening of service area
• Lighting
Member Maetzold indicated his support of the proposed development observing the property is
going to redeveloped. This use compliments the residential neighborhood adjacent to the property.
Member Hovland agreed with moving forward with preliminary approvals as long as the safety
issues can be addressed before final zoning is granted.
Member Kelly stated his reluctance to grant rezoning until the issues are resolved satisfactorily. He
added that the developer can obtain options and, if necessary, deadlines can be changed. Member
Kelly asked how the previously mentioned issues relate to granting preliminary approvals of the
project and does granting preliminary approval weaken or change the City's position relative to
granting final rezoning.
Planner Larsen replied the plan needs to be refined addressing the issues previously outlined to the
City Council's satisfaction. At final zoning, the Council decides if the issues have ultimately been
addressed.
Attorney Gilligan explained that relative to the rezoning, granting preliminary approval does not
encumber the Council in their deliberations of final rezoning. However, denial at this point would
require the applicant to wait one year before resubmitting a proposal.
Member Hovland introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption conditioned upon
final rezoning and final plat approval:
RESOLUTION
Page 6
Minutes/Edina City Council/November 17, 1997
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL that preliminary approval be granted
amending the Comprehensive Plan showing 7128 France Avenue South as Multi- Family
Residential. Member Maetzold seconded the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold, Smith
Resolution adopted.
Member Hovland made a motion granting first reading to Ordinance No. 850 -A13 rezoning the
property located at 7128 France Avenue from Single Dwelling Zoning District to PSR4, Planned
Senior Residence, conditioned upon satisfactory resolution of the issues identified by Council and
citizens, final rezoning, and final plat approval. Member Maetzold seconded the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold, Smith
Motion carried.
FIRST READING GRANTED FOR ORDINANCE NO. 1997 -14, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING
EDINA CODE SECTION 1230 AND 900 AND MODIFYING CITY POLICY REGARDING THE
CONSUMPTION OF 3.2% MALT LIQUOR AT CERTAIN CITY PARKS AND FACILITIES
Assistant Manager Hughes reminded that on November 3, 1997, the subject ordinance which
regulates consumption and sale of various alcoholic beverages at City -owned facilities was before the
Council. Staff, following Council's direction, presented the revised ordinance reflecting more clearly
where certain beverages may be consumed or sold.
Member Kelly made a motion granting first reading for Ordinance No. 1997 -14, An Ordinance
Amending Edina Code Section 1230 and 900 and Modifying City Policy Regarding the
Consumption of 3.2% Malt Liquor at Certain City Parks and Facilities. Member Hovland seconded
the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Hovland, Kelly, Smith
Nays: Maetzold
First Reading Granted.
FIRST READING GRANTED FOR ORDINANCE NO. 1997-17, AN ORDINANCE REGULATING
THE SALE AND USE OF TOBACCO PRODUCTS Sanitarian Velde explained the Minnesota
Legislature passed a law during the 1997 session requiring licensing of retail tobacco sales,
mandating annual compliance checks of licensed facilities, establishes minimum penalties through an
administrative penalty system and requiring alternative penalties for minors who violate the law.
State law places restrictions on self - service merchandising and sales of tobacco products through
vending machines.
Presently, Code Section 1325 addressees self - service merchandising and sales through vending
machines. Section 1325, however, does not mandate compliance checks, did not provide an
administrative penalty system with fines and does not address alternative penalties for minors.
Sanitation Velde presented overheads of proposed Section 1326 which addressed State law as
follows:
DEFINITIONS:
• Tobacco or Tobacco Related Products
Cigarettes, cigars, chewing tobacco, pipe tobacco and other forms of tobacco leaf
suitable for chewing, sniffing or smoking
• Tobacco Related Devices
Page 7
i
v
�PRR THG N°h
December 22, 1997
Craig Larson
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, Minnesota 55424
Subject: Proposed Karrington Community
France Avenue and Hazelton, Edina
Dear Mr. Larson:
By prior invitation (a copy of which is enclosed) representatives of Karrington and Opus met
with Cornelia neighbors on December 16, 1997. Six neighbors attended the meeting to continue
discussions about the proposed Karrington project at France Avenue and Hazelton. We continue
to be very pleased with the spirit of cooperation that is apparent within the concerned citizens of
the neighborhood.
At the meeting we walked through our proposed final submittal including the site plan, grading
plan, landscape plan and elevations. A color rendering for the proposed facility was also shared.
A formal written response (enclosed dated December 15) to the neighborhood's letter of
November 25, 1997 (enclosed) was passed out and reviewed point by point.
The three issues which were under discussion at the meeting were as follows:
1. Could Karrington add some additional evergreens along the berm to further mask
potential lights from the parking lot?
Yes. It will be done.
2. Since Karrington cannot accept a conservation easement, what assurance can the
neighborhood have that the site assisted living project would not be razed some
day for the construction of an office building?
We believe that the City's zoning and zoning process would not allow this to
happen without the opportunity for neighborhood involvement. How can the City
help make the neighborhood comfortable with this issue? We would look forward
to discussing the issue at you earliest convenience.
KARRINGTON COMMUNITIES
919 Old Henderson Road / Columbus, OH 43220 / 614.451.5151 / Fax: 451.5199
3. There was not a consensus regarding where sidewalks should be placed. One
neighbor felt strongly that there should also be a sidewalk along Lynmar while
others preferred the additional greenspace /landscaping.
It is Karrington's position that the site is better served by the additional landscape
buffer rather than to have a sidewalk along Lynmar. The balance of the site
would be surrounded by sidewalks which we believe is more than adequate for
pedestrian traffic.
We hope that this information is helpful to the City as it continues to consider this project. It is
our intention to make the final project submittal on January 14 so that we can be on the planning
commission agenda on January 28 and on the City Council agenda on February 17. Please feel
free to contact me with any questions or comments. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Michael A. Concilla
Project Coordinator
cc: Julie Kimble, Opus
John Kuehn
Edina City Council members
Edina Planning Commission members
RRT H .
�P�
N INC.
December 15, 1997
Dear Cornelia Neighborhood Committee:
Thank you for your letter (a copy of which is attached) dated November 25, 1997. We
appreciate your support to date for this project and your willingness to communicate openly
and directly regarding your concerns and suggestions.
By this letter we are responding to the Recommendations for the Redevelopment of 7128
France Avenue South which was attached to your letter.
Building Mass and Configuration:
1. The project architects have worked to minimize the overall mass and have made the
floor plate slightly smaller. The result of these changes have increased the rear
building setback from Lynmar to approximately 180' and reduced the overall mass
of the building.
2. As described above, the new footprint increases the rear setback.
3. The service entrance faces diagonally away from the neighborhood, towards
Hazelton Road. The entire service area is completely shielded from the neighbors
by residential units and building mass in the rear. In addition, there is very limited
services to the facility and only panel trucks are used for deliveries.
Traffic:
1. The curb cuts have been adjusted as requested. There will be "no left turn" signs
posted. Further, Karrington will ask its employees to use the France /Hazelton
intersection only.
2. Karrington will ask its employees not to park on Hazelton Road. Karrington does
not have any control over others who wish to park on the street. It is our
understanding, however, that the City of Edina has a public process for the
restriction of on- street parking that the neighborhood may wish to pursue.
3. Karrington will be happy instruct their employees to utilize routes to work other than
Cornelia Drive.
4. We believe that the City is willing to address the issue of the timing /cycling of the
traffic signal at Hazelton Road and France Avenue.
KARRI NGTON COMMUNITIES
919 Old Henderson Road / Columbus, OH 43220 / 614.451.5151 / Fax: 451 .5199
Safety:
1. As you can see on the revised site plan, the wet pond area has now been
eliminated as a result of engineering cooperation between the City, the Watershed
District, and project engineers. We believe that this will eliminate all safety issues
relative to the ponding.
2. The requested sidewalks are now shown on the site plan.
3. Should damage to a home be the direct result of construction at this site,
Karrington, its contractor and /or their insurance companies will correct the damage.
Environment and Landscaping:
1. Since any conservation easement placed on the property will remain there in
perpetuity, our lenders will not finance our project with that restriction. We have no
intention of ever expanding on the site, in fact our building is not designed for
expansion. The City's zoning'procedures and laws will protect the neighborhood
from any change in the use or design of our project and site. Any change would
have to go through this same zoning process and public input.
2. The revised landscaping plan shows berming along Lynmar to the corner of
Hazelton and Lynmar (which is designed so that site lines and therefore safety is
not impaired at the corner). The berm has been. designed to provide screening as
well as to be architecturally interesting.
3. We understand the concern with this issue and will be in compliance with all of the
requirements of the City of Edina and Watershed District relative to the need for
engineering to ensure good drainage. The project can not commence until the
engineering calculations are deemed adequate by the regulating agencies.
4. Karrington is pleased to work with the neighborhood on a landscape plan on its own
property, but is not prepared to provide for landscaping on land it does not own.
The west boundary of our project does provide for evergreens as part of the
landscape plan.
5. Karrington will provide for any landscape bonds that are normal and customary
requirements of the City of Edina or other governing agencies for the purpose of
ensuring the guarantee of the plant materials used.
Sincerely,
k-N-co�
Michael A. Concilla
Project Coordinator
Rick & Debbie Adair
7120 Lynmar Lane
Edina, MN 55435
612- 926 -9576
February 10, 1998
Edina City Council
C/O Edina Planning department
4801 West 50'x' Street
Edina, MN 55424
Re: Z -97 -4, Rezoning of the Lutheran Church of the Master site
Dear Members of the City Council,
We live directly across from the LCM site and wish to express our approval
of the Karrington proposal recently passed by the Planning Commission.
We believe that this plan is an appropriate use of this site relative to the
existing neighborhood. Karrington has made adjustments to its plan to
address various concerns raised by neighbors. That is commendable.
At the Planning Commission meeting, Commission member David Byron
urged that the City require a sidewalk on the west side of the site, along
Lynmar Lane. Mr. Byron's suggestion is well- intentioned, but neither
necessary nor in the best interests of the immediate neighborhood.
We have lived on Lynmar Lane for ten years. Except for our family, and our
immediate neighbors, there is virtually no foot traffic on Lynmar Lane. It is
simply not a significant pedestrian route. We would much prefer that the
Karrington development be able to use as much of the western edge of the
site as possible to create a buffer between the exisiting homes and the new
building and parking lot.
To conclude, we support the Karrington proposal, including the absence of
the sidewalk on Lynmar Lane. Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
P,-t, q cu
Rick and Debbie Adair
0
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Craig Larsen
City Planner
Date: February 17, 1998
Subject: P -98 -1, Final Development
Plan. 6950 Xerxes Avenue.
Guardian Savings
Recommendation:
Agenda Item ll. B.
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑
Action ❑
To H RA
To Council
Motion
Resolution
Ordinance
Discussion
The Planning Commission recommends approval of the proposed Final
Development Plan.
Info /Background:
See attached Planning Commission minutes, staff report and revised plans.
DRAFT MINUTES P.C. MEETING JANUARY 28, 1998
Members Present: Runyan, McClelland, Lonsbury, Byron, Workinger,
Bergman
P -98 -1 Guardian Savings
6950 Xerxes Avenue South
Mr. Larsen informed the Commission the subject property is zoned
Planned Commercial District, PCD -3, and is developed with a 33,300 square foot
indoor tennis facility. Total site area is 68,012 square feet. The proposed Final
Development Plan contemplates razing the existing building and redeveloping
the site with a two building, 12,150 square foot retail project. The proposed bank
and retail strip mall are allowed uses in the PCD -3 district.
Mr. Larsen explained the proposed buildings would share the same
architecture and exterior finish materials. Both buildings would be finished with a
brick veneer and stone masonry accents.
Mr. Larsen stated as proposed, the redeveloped site would require only
one variance. The service drive on the north side of the building maintains an
8.5 foot set back where 10 feet is required by code. The proposal complies with
all other Zoning Ordinance requirements.
Mr. Larsen asked the Commission to note roof drainage from the north
one -half of the existing building flows northerly to the adjacent parking lot. The
proposed plan would continue this drainage pattern. The City Engineer
recommends that catch basins be installed and that storm water be piped to the
system in Xerxes Avenue.
Mr. Larsen concluded the proposed development complies with all Zoning
Ordinance requirements except for the drive aisle setback adjacent to the
northerly property line, and is not detrimental to adjacent properties. Staff
recommends approval of the proposed Final Development Plan to include
granting the variance request. Approval should be conditioned on the storm
sewer changes suggested by the City Engineer.
Mr. Tom Melody, and members of the development team were present to
respond to questions.
Chair Runyan commented in his opinion this is a very tight site, and if
someone parks on the proposed service road, stacking will occur. Mr. Larsen
agreed, stating that is an management control issue they will have to address.
Mr. Larsen said in his opinion there is adequate parking to serve the public,
reiterating stacking may become a problem if the service road is not addressed.
Commissioner McClelland questioned what would happen if in the future
the bank wanted a drive -up aisle. Mr. Larsen said this project is driven by the
bank, and they have indicated no desire for a drive -up facility. Mr. Larsen
concluded if this proposal is approved as presented, it does not give the bank
the right to install a drive -up window.
Commissioner Lonsbury questioned the proposed lighting, and how it will
impact the residents in Richfield. He added he wants their property rights
protected by adequate screening of both lighting, and the parking area.
Mr. Larsen agreed those points are legitimate concerns. He said lighting
standards would need to be directed downward so light does not wash into the
residential neighborhood. He also pointed out the proposed lights can be put on
timers that turn off at a certain time. Additional landscaping along the easterly
property boundary can reduce the impact of the development from the residential
homes directly east of the subject site. Concluding Mr. Larsen explained the
proposed landscaping meets code requirements, but the Commission has it in
their power to request more landscaping, and light control measures.
Commissioner Bergman questioned the distance between the curb cut for
the proposed development, and the curb cut for Walgreens. Mr. Larsen said the
curb cuts are probably only 20 feet apart, but he pointed out the proposed
project uses the existing curb cut. Mr. Larsen added the engineering department
has indicated the locations of the two existing curb cuts should not be a problem.
Mr. Tom Melody introduced himself to the Commission and told them the
proposed bank does not plan on adding a drive -up window, and in response to
Commissioner Lonsbury's suggestion to add additional landscaping, that can
also be implemented.
Chair Runyan asked if the bank/retail shop(s) will have to wheel their trash
to a more convenient location for pickup. Mr. Melody stated that is correct.
Commissioner Byron asked for clarification on the distance between curb
cuts. Mr. Melody stated Mr. Larsen is correct, the distance between the existing
curb cut for this site and the Walgreen's site is 20 feet. Mr. Larsen interjected
the Commission should note there is a grade separation between the properties.
Commissioner Byron questioned if the grade separation could be a safety issue.
Mr. Larsen reiterated the engineering department has reviewed the plans and
believes the existing curb cut is the best location. He added the engineering
department does not want to see curb cuts on Xerxes Avenue.
Commissioner Byron pointed out if someone is traveling from the east,
and another vehicle is closely following, the driver may not know which curb cut
the vehicle in front is entering (Proposed bank or Walgreen's) because of the
close proximity of the curb cuts. This may cause at minimum an abrupt stop, or
possibly an accident. Commissioner McClelland said it may be possible for the
management team to solve internal circulation problems and traffic issues with
signage such as in /out only, etc..
A discussion ensued with Commission Members in agreement that this is
a tight site, but the proper zoning exists to support the proposal, a non-
conforming condition does exist regarding the driveway, and redevelopment is
needed.
Commissioner McClelland moved to recommend Final Development Plan
approval subject to staff conditions, with special consideration by the proponent
on internal traffic patterns. Commissioner Bergman seconded the motion.
Commissioner Lonsbury asked to amend the motion to include the
addition of more landscaping along the easterly property line, to consider timers
for the light standards, with the assurance the lights will not wash into the
residential neighborhood by being directed downward.
Commissioner McClelland accepted the amendment.
Commissioner Workinger stated he feels this proposal pushes the
development limits of the site, and he can not support it.
Ayes; McClelland, Byron, Bergman, Runyan. Nays; Lonsbury, Workinger.
Motion carried 4 -2.
Flor'"Al. DEVELLOPMEM7
N . U M B E R P-98-1 PLAN
LOCATION 6950 Xerxes Avenue South
REQUEST Construct two (2) retail buildings
EDINA PLAMMING DE,=ARTME4:q a
EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
JANUARY 28, 1998
P -98 -1 Guardian Savings
6950 Xerxes Avenue South
The subject property is zoned Planned Commercial District, PCD -3, and is
developed with a 33,300 square foot indoor tennis facility. Total site area is
68,012 square feet. The proposed Final Development Plan contemplates razing
the existing building and redeveloping the site with a two building, 12,150 square
foot retail project. The proposed bank and retail strip mall are allowed uses in
the PCD -3 district.
The proposed buildings would share the same architecture and exterior
finish materials. Both buildings would be finished with a brick veneer and stone
masonry accents.
As proposed, the redeveloped site would require only one variance. The
service drive on the north side of the building maintains an 8.5 foot set back
where 10 feet is required by code. The proposal complies with all other Zoning
Ordinance requirements.
Roof drainage from the north one -half of the existing building flows
northerly to the adjacent parking lot. The proposed plan would continue this
drainage pattern. The City Engineer recommends that catch basins be installed
and that storm water be piped to the system in Xerxes Avenue.
RECOMMENDATION
The proposed development complies with all Zoning Ordinance
requirements except for the drive aisle setback adjacent to the northerly property
line. In my opinion that variance is insignificant, and is not detrimental to
,adjacent properties. Staff recommends approval of the proposed Final
Development Plan to include granting the variance request. Approval should be
conditioned on the storm sewer changes suggested by the City Engineer.
7
1 m,E
O
CTP L S -ED It. N�
L
S �
IM3,
nLc
FIRS1 RC M-T. - — 11,
—0 fO0ivamr ATE- - .S'.— . -I
rN
O
7
< L
X
x
30 PARKING SPACES (exis-i"- . .....
INS
I -OFFICE BLDG, PARCEL - OFFICE BLDG. PARCEL
......
IRKING LOT j
— — — — —
PARKING LOT --___l B, CUS SURFACE •
FWNID
C-PPEO
a
IRON -
148 39 �4,9*.00 E
- . ! • .— — "
�sp I
. "
R. ALL UTILITIES S, BE �C`EIt PtIW
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
TREE PROTECTOM FENCING
WW AML —1
IL A-1 11 1�r I1
-
. 1.
RI_IELD
L
7
ACCAgW Ot SEA —
(L—) M (M)9S2-1165
S. STREET IRPItt SHALL WET OTY MCNITEMElm
.
_117�- - - -
by TO FOU— UTILITIES
la�
typ
5,N
�1311 �7
A
r:-,%
IN
J.
•A... .—
CIS
IS WOUIROO 61 IINESOTI STANK 21W
V�
SOU MDALE TENNIS CLUB
i Pe
STORY CONCRETE BLOCK & STUCCO BUILONC
47.00
STREET ADDRESS. 69W FERIES AvENUE SWTN
— . Ron,>D — w 9R.
EON' INNESOFA
0L) TH LINE OF TRACT M. 589•49'00"W
1 m,E
O
CTP L S -ED It. N�
L
S �
IM3,
nLc
FIRS1 RC M-T. - — 11,
—0 fO0ivamr ATE- - .S'.— . -I
rN
O
7
< L
X
x
0
Ot
4.,
AWN111 MAU.
30 PARKING SPACES (exis-i"- . .....
INS
......
19ML
— — — — —
— — — — — — —
— ___�
1. ALL UOUT, UWOS
-1 "OA.— . TItS
R. ALL UTILITIES S, BE �C`EIt PtIW
umiT OF DEMOLITION
( Typ
TREE PROTECTOM FENCING
WW AML —1
—TY. �T.l — STATE
-
. 1.
RI_IELD
L
ACCAgW Ot SEA —
(L—) M (M)9S2-1165
S. STREET IRPItt SHALL WET OTY MCNITEMElm
7"
_117�- - - -
by TO FOU— UTILITIES
la�
0
Ot
4.,
AWN111 MAU.
LEGEND
o p7 1 RATER 1
Qy Dr-L—S TIES
TREE
..Tt Al
OR. SEKR LNE
S_ SE^E1
?EJ ,_E -ONE'.
30 PARKING SPACES (exis-i"- . .....
INS
......
19ML
— — — — —
— — — — — — —
— ___�
1. ALL UOUT, UWOS
-1 "OA.— . TItS
R. ALL UTILITIES S, BE �C`EIt PtIW
umiT OF DEMOLITION
( Typ
TREE PROTECTOM FENCING
WW AML —1
—TY. �T.l — STATE
-
. 1.
ACCAgW Ot SEA —
(L—) M (M)9S2-1165
S. STREET IRPItt SHALL WET OTY MCNITEMElm
7"
_117�- - - -
by TO FOU— UTILITIES
la�
5,N
�1311 �7
A
r:-,%
J.
•A... .—
CIS
IS WOUIROO 61 IINESOTI STANK 21W
V�
C'ER— — w —1 a X..'-
47.00
— . Ron,>D — w 9R.
0L) TH LINE OF TRACT M. 589•49'00"W
R N_ 529-
10 FT
)NC.
I R WLL: REMAIN 70TH
STREET
ZCONC: J
CURS
GUTTER MALL REMAIN
.... I.
LEGEND
o p7 1 RATER 1
Qy Dr-L—S TIES
TREE
..Tt Al
OR. SEKR LNE
S_ SE^E1
?EJ ,_E -ONE'.
7
I
51!
z
0
2 oz Z,
z 0-
"o
z
z 4 z o
C3, 03 ou r-
F=
Cc x
C.1
19ML
— — — — —
— — — — — — —
— ___�
1. ALL UOUT, UWOS
-1 "OA.— . TItS
R. ALL UTILITIES S, BE �C`EIt PtIW
To—
WW AML —1
—TY. �T.l — STATE
START OF
E.1 CO
ACCAgW Ot SEA —
(L—) M (M)9S2-1165
S. STREET IRPItt SHALL WET OTY MCNITEMElm
IIJ9LIC
L_
0
by TO FOU— UTILITIES
Wt Ol` WAR AREA) M IRQUTST TI,E
IDJCTRC PIOII� STATES �R C
OF ALL �_ Wms
•A... .—
CIS
IS WOUIROO 61 IINESOTI STANK 21W
C'ER— — w —1 a X..'-
— . Ron,>D — w 9R.
10 FT
7
I
51!
z
0
2 oz Z,
z 0-
"o
z
z 4 z o
C3, 03 ou r-
F=
Cc x
C.1
_347.00
MCUNiA9_E C,.R3 6' SCREEN FENCE
R 2' ' i�N'/ CA -s ONE WAY SERV.CE 12 r- BI�JMIVOUS PAVEMrNT��T R 12 R 27
R 15' AR�AH 207 -6 1 20-
'6 R 2.5 C °.o0RE- 9,350 SF RETAIL SPACE
:EE
NOTE 3
6
60'� 6' CCNC SOr' ■ALK 1 1 I 1 C
I. 165j AN 6
R 375
17 A 2 a
•'y'T'j� , I v 8,S' (IYP) I 4- 8. 8 6,
MI
CP _ 2a
i-: 10 IB +' BANK ; N ` ~ a 25
2,800 SF W n
- --- - 5' — I 2:
0.
66/ s%-1� 2+ - ' 20 T
R 225
7+ ° r 81TUV'NOUS PAVEMEN7—
' / ' II y -8612 CURB @ WRER(TYP) I y - I
�10051 70 IIID
P117e1 SIf.N 9 I;
7. R so I s' zD'
I 1 R 501
1 1 r Ce 347.D0" MATCH E%SRNO -!
CURB & G:.'TER
70TH STREET
S
SITE Dniq: a
LOT AREA..._.._ ... .......... ..... 1.56 ACRES (60.012 S.F #
2JV:NC. _. ... ... .. _.. PCO -3 PLA,`IEO S
DIS'RICI
NA%IV -M FLOOR AREA RARO RECUIREJ...0.5
MA%IY UM FLOOR AREA RA RO PROV.DED.. 018
YA %IMUM BUILDING MEICMT .... NO MA%IV11V: HEIGHT TO RE
0 r
E=—E0 RY SETBACK _
11Iw01NC S: RIAC.K
fH ONT SIRFEI.... .. .. ..50 IEf 1 °
SITE S MEET ....... ....... ...... ..50 FEET
IN--R CR SDE YARD ................: FEET
REAR MAR;... ...............^ TEET ip
PARK: \C & OR VE SETBA:t
FROND STR_E T ......... ............... 2O FEET
SIDE STREET-.. ........ _.... .... .. 2C FEET Q c
IN"ER'CR S CE YARD...
.IO F_ET
lJ REAR YARD 0 it
FEEI �g(k o
Z Sa it
PARKI,C aECI: RED
2.000 S= % I S'ACE S.,:-
R- 'A:_ SPACE_
I•CCO SF % B S =ACES /LOCOS= - 0 S'+:_= .0 N W B.35C SF % 6 S=AC?S /LOOCSF 50 SPACES +53- �„
e
.... .!+ CU'RE7 72 SPACES q yaK6.
xPARK:vC PROV7EC _........ .. .. .. ........ 72 SPACES :dafi3N o
NO-"-`
I. A'__ CURB SHALL BE CCN3E1 8612 i
2. A'__ D ME %SIC%S TO FACE C- CURB OR TO
FATE OF BUILC "C.
3 TRAS, AREA' VEBFT A:-.,AL SIZE 0=
TRAS- CCV"A,ER TC ? -1.
5- TO R
CC,S'RUC T.NC CC, C : -- _+- A,7 SCREEN ■
FE w /CA-s. jr
+ I- JIl DIN1.- A•.] PA •'
S+•.; A rAPAI Fi ;
TO I!- S.1- PR•�P: RIT l:'.=
10� o g
i rL
z� c
S W
a was G
7. 4 Z
W= W
C3 O 0
l� tr a O
O 4 V
> O
u f-
u
C.2
Y
e: ,.e
FLOOR PLAN - RETAIL CENTER
RETAIL CENTER ELEVATION - NORTH
�• .
R =TAIL CENTER ELEVATION - 5OUTN
G�l:lfae rxlilik*uC A
RETAIL CENTER ELEVATION - WEST RETAIL CENTER ELEVATION - EAST
� v.�e as ..r
a: r
RETAIL CENTER SECTION
i-W A
��egtdA Arctiledt hlc
- •MINNESOTA
LTA
�. •aQ" Y ny
CC ""ST
7565
NEW FACILM' FOR
CCARDIAN
PLAZA
EDI \A.
MINNESOTA
Ia'
A2
ok a t.
y
• PORXV •
1.e. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Francis Hoffman, City Engineer
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000
DATE:. 17 February, 1998
AGENDA ITEM iii.A.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Traffic Signal Control Systems TS -23 W. 78`h St. & Cecilia Cir. /Delaney Blvd.
& TS -20 W. 78`h St. & Cahill Rd.
Company
1. Killmer Electric Co., Inc.
2. Collins Electrical Systems, Inc.
3. Electric Service Company
4. Egan -McKay Electrical Contractors, Inc.
5. Electrical Installation & Maintenance Co.
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Killmer Electric Co., Inc.
Amount of Quote or Bid
1. $163,075.00
2. $167,397.00
3. $179,900.00
4. $185,838.00
5. $187,120.00
$163,075.00
GENERAL INFORMATION:
This purchse is for two traffic signal control systems. System "A" (TS -23) will be located at W. 78`h
Street and Cecilia Circle /Delaney Boulevard and System "B" (TS -20) will be located at W. 78`h Street
and Cahill Road. These improvements will be funded through state aid and the developer, DOS. The
Engineer's Estimate for this project was $220,000.00.
� �. r^�✓ Public Works - Engineering
Signat gre /' . Department
not within budget JoV Wallin, F ance Director
/2z Ll P, /(�/ .
Kehn6th Rosland, City M ager
The Recommended Bid is y
within budget
NA
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor & City Council
FROM: Francis Hoffman, City Engineer
VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000
DATE: 17 February, 1998
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Well Repair for Three Wells
Company
1. Cahoy, Inc.
2. T.L Stevens Well Company
3. Bergerson - Caswell, Inc.
4. E.H. Renner & Sons
5. Keys Well Drilling Company
6. Thein Well Company
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Cahoy, Inc.
I
AGENDA ITEM 111.13.
Amount of Quote or Bid
1. $43,251.00
2. $44,889.00
3. $45,243.00
4. $45,782.00
5. $47,253.00
$43,251.00
GENERAL INFORMATION:
This purchase is for the general overhaul and renovation of three City wells. Well #6 is located at 5901
Ruth Drive, Well #11 is located at 7620 Parklawn Avenue and Well #16 is located at 6001 Gleason
Road. This project is part of our annual capital plan work to maintain our wells in proper working
condition. These improvements will be funded by the utility system. The Engineer's Estimate for this
project was $36,000.00.
-c % �^ P �✓ Public Works - Utilities
Signa re Departme t
The Recommended Bid is i(
within budget not within bud et Jo V1 allin Finance Director
Kenneth Rosland, City anager
%-A
0
NO
"Colees /
aea
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
Agenda Item # IV. A.
FROM: VINCE BONGAARTS
Consent
TRAFFIC SAFETY COORD
Information Only El
DATE: FEBRUARY 17, 1998
Mgr. Recommends F�
To HRA
®
To Council
SUBJECT: TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF
Action
Motion
REVIEW - FEBRUARY 3,
1998
Resolution
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the Traffic Safety Staff Review of Tuesday, February 3, 1998.
INFO /BACKGROUND:
AAreport
TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 3. 1998
The staff review of traffic safety matters occurred on February 3, 1998. Staff present
included the Assistant City Manager, Police Chief, Assistant City Engineer, the Traffic
Safety Coordinator and the Public Works Traffic Control Specialist.
From that review, the below recommendations are provided. On each of the items,
persons involved have been contacted and the staff recommendation has been
discussed with them. They have also been informed that if they disagree with the
recommendation or have additional facts to present, they can be included on the
February 17, 1998, Council Agenda.
SECTION A:
Requests on which the staff recommends approval.
Request for a "Yield" sign on W. 61 St at Chowen Avenue. This is a 'T' type
intersection, Chowen being the thru street. Chowen Avenue south of W. 61 St
Street curves gradually in an easterly direction. The southeast corner lot of the
intersection has four pine trees that create some visibility problems for cars both
westbound on W. 61St Street and northbound on Chowen because of that curve
in the roadway. The pine trees are not in violation of the clearview ordinance.
There is no accident history for the intersection.
The "Yield" sign would give the cars on W. 61 St a visual reminder that they need
to yield to vehicles on Chowen Avenue.
The staff recommends the installation of a "Yield" sign for westbound W. 61 St at
Chowen Avenue.
2. Request for highlighting the "Do Not Block Intersection" signs at the Edina
Industrial Boulevard and Metro Boulevard intersection. Request also calls for
'stop bars' to designate where vehicles should stop for lights.
This intersection does have a lot of rush hour congestion and does have some
accident history. There is construction scheduled for Highway 100/W. 77th in
1998 by Mn /DOT. This should help clear the intersections better in that area.
The Police Department has been working on the problems at that intersection
and feels the above requests would help.
TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW
February 3, 1998
Page 2
The staff recommends that the "Do Not Block Intersection" signs be highlighted
and the stop bars added to the intersection of Edina Industrial Boulevard and
Metro Boulevard.
SECTION B:
Requests on which the staff recommends denial of request.
None.
SECTION C:
Requests which are deferred to a later date or referred to others.
None.
l9
am
REPORURECOM M EN DATION
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Solvei Swenson
Recycling Coordinator
Date: February 17, 1998
Subject: Adopt Resolution for
Municipal Recycling Grant
Agreement with Hennepin
County
Recommendation:
Agenda Item #
Consent
Information Only
Mgr. Recommends
Action
TE
❑ To HRA
® To Council
❑
Motion
®
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Adopt a resolution authorizing the City of Edina to enter into an agreement with
Hennepin County to accept funding for the Edina Recycling Program.
Info /Background:
The City of Edina Recycling program applies for -Grant money through the
Hennepin County SCORE (Select Committee on Recycling and the Environment) fund.
In order to be eligible to receive the monies Edina must enter into an agreement to
receive the funds and use them for the residential recycling program.
The amount of Grant money has not yet been determined. The anticipated
amount will be no more than 5% less than last years $133052.
o
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CITY
ENTER INTO 1998 MUNICIPAL RECYCLING
GRANT AGREEMENT WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY
City of Edina
WHEREAS, the City of Edina operates a recycling program consistent with
Minnesota Statutes 115A.02 and 115A.03, as amended by the Laws of Minnesota 1992,
Chapter, 685, and Minnesota Statutes, 473.8011; and
WHEREAS, the Edina Recycling Program is consistent with the Office of
Environmental Assistance Solid Waste Management Development Guide /Policy Plan, the
Hennepin County Solid Waste Master Plan; and Hennepin County's Residential Recycling
Funding Policy; and
WHEREAS, the Hennepin County Board has adopted a Resolution authorizing
funding for Municipal Recycling Programs.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Edina City Council that the Mayor
and the City Manager to enter into an Agreement with Hennepin County to accept funding
for the Edina Recycling Program.
Adopted this 17th day of February, 1998
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby
certify that the attached and foregoing City Council Minutes is a true and correct copy of
the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of February
17th, 1998 and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting.
WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this 17th day of February, 1998
Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk
City Hall (612) 927 -8861
4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 927 -76.1;
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 927 -5461
o e
Cn
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
From: David A. Velde
City Sanitarian
Date: February 17, 1998
Subject: Adopt Resolution for a
Tobacco Free Community
Grant for 1998 -1999.
Recommendation:
Agenda Item # iv.c.
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
® To Council
Action ❑
Motion
®
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Adopt a resolution authorizing David Velde, Edina Community Health
Administrator to sign a contract with the Minnesota Department of Health for a Tobacco
Free Community Grant for calendar years 1998 and 1999.
Info /Background:
The Edina Health Department submitted a grant application to the Minnesota
Department of Health for the Tobacco -Free Communities for Children, Community
Action Grant. These grants are being awarded to Community Health Agencies who are
implementing programs to change community norms related to tobacco use by the
youth.
These funds may be used to provide the following activities:
• Develop a database of tobacco retailers
• Develop a database of tobacco laws
• Monitor enforcement of penalties for tobacco violations
• Develop innovative law enforcement measures for youth violators
• Assess the number of tobacco free restaurants or worksites in the community
• Collect data on compliance checks
• Publicize tobacco related information through the media
• Encourage worksites, restaurants, malls, stadiums, or other public places to
become smoke free
• Identify gaps in laws, enforcement or policies and recommend measures to
address those gaps.
These funds may not be used to fund enforcement activities, pay for smoking
cessation classes or pay for activities which directly benefit an individual. The focus of
the grant is on broad community activities.
The cost breakdown of the proposed grant are as follows:
Salaries
$2,000
Contractual Services
5,000
Supplies
1,000
Telephone /Postage
500
Transportation
1,000
Other
500
Total $10,000
These are the expenditures for 1998 only
I anticipate coordinating and cooperating with Richfield and Bloomington
Community Health Agencies on some of these activities. Together, we will be able to
stretch these grant funds to cover some of the costs we will have in common.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CITY
ENTER INTO A TOBACCO FREE COMMUNITIES
GRANT CONTRACT WITH
WITH THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
WHEREAS, the Edina City Council is the Community Health Board for the City of
Edina; and
WHEREAS, the Edina Community Health Board has been active in reducing tobacco
usage by youth in our community; and
WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Health is authorized by Minnesota Statutes
145.14, Subd. 3 to award special grants to community health boards to conduct community-
wide programs to prevent tobacco use; and
WHEREAS, the Edina Health Department has applied for a special grant for the
purpose of conducting community -wide programs to prevent tobacco use in the community of
Edina.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Edina Community Health Board that
the Community Health Administrator be authorized to enter into a contract with the Minnesota
Department of Health to accept funding for the Tobacco Free Communities for Children
Grant.
Adopted this 17" day of February, 1998
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify
that the attached and foregoing City Council Minutes is a true correct copy of the Resolution
duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of February 17, 1998 and as
recorded in the minutes of said meeting.
WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this 18`h day of February, 1997
Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk
me �11�,� REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Francis Hoffman .
City Engineer �l U
Date: February 17, 1998
Subject: Public Hearing - Feasibility
Report & Set Hearing Date
Two Reconstruction Projects
BA -315 (W. 77th St. at TH 100)
& BA -316 (France Ave. at
Crosstown 62)
Recommendation:
Set hearing date of March 2, 1998.
Info /Background:
Agenda Item #
Consent
Information Only
Mgr. Recommends
Action
N.D. 1. &2.
❑ To HRA
® To Council
® Motion
® Resolution
❑ Ordinance
❑. Discussion
The City, under a local initiatives project with Mn /DOT, is proposing to reconstruct a
portion of ramps at two interchanges and roadways in Edina, W. 77th Street at TH 100
(BA -315) and France Avenue at Crosstown 62 (BA -316). These projects would provide
capacity improvements along with improved traffic signal systems. These two projects
are "local initiatives" projects where the City initiates the project because it is not large
enough to receive high priority in the Mn /DOT project selection program. The estimated
cost for improvement BA -315 is $1,150,600.00 and funding would be from state and
City state aid funds. The estimated cost for improvement BA -316 is $700,000.00 and
also would be funded from state and City state aid and county state aid funds. Both
projects are considered feasible and staff would suggest a hearing date of March 2,
1998.
1�
r„
oe� tit
0
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
less
To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # IV.E.
From: Francis Hoffman ,�(_ Consent
City Engineer ' Information Only
Date: February 17, 1998 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
® To Council
Subject: Annual Bridge Certification Action ❑ Motion
❑ Resolution
❑ Ordinance
❑ Discussion
Recommendation: Review report.
Info /Background:
The City Engineer is required to have all City bridges and culverts of a certain size to be
inspected and certify to the State that the inspections were completed. There are twenty -five
bridges and culverts that currently are inspected annually or officially every second year based
on design and age. One structure, the Soo Line Bridge over W. 44th Street is not owned by the
City, but the State requires the City to inspect it because it is over a City street. In the past,.
staff has written to both the State officials and railroad officials regarding this structure. It is an
old structure that the railroad officially maintains that it is adequate for rail use. Staff continues
to suggest that additional maintenance work should be done to prolong the life of the structure.
Additionally, the State now allows bridges to be inspected every second year instead of
annually. Thirteen structures (bridges and culverts) meet the State criteria for every other year
official inspection. Staff continues to informally review all structures annually. The reason for
the every other year official inspections is to reduce inspections costs and paperwork when it is
obviously a structure which is newer or type (culvert) that simply would not have significant
deterioration occurring annually. In 1997, the City inspected all twenty -five structures.
Finally, two structures of the twenty -five need to be replaced or refurbished in the next few
years. The Browndale bridge currently has a weight restriction and is in need of refurbishing
and reconstruction. Staff has started preliminary engineering work on the Browndale bridge.
Also, the W. 56`h Street bridge over Minnehaha Creek should be scheduled for refurbishing or
replacement as soon as the Browndale bridge is completed. Staff would seek State bridge
bonding funds for both since neither bridge is on a street which is state aid eligible. Both of
these structures plus the railroad bridge will receive additional review this spring. Also, staff is
wot'king with SRF, our bridge consultant, to develop a final proposal to request state bridge
bonding funds.
PKINS
v 11 x -
I
IE II
T1 16N
T
'21 12I I]IIB R21•
I
Mcodo"rook
Lake
ST. LOUIS PARK
riLuumilvv a vi-4
N
W. 40th i
I
615
T21N
R2 4w
TZSN R24M
1 •
1617
�h ST.
48th
iT. MINNEAPOLIF
I ST.
TI ITM R249
18117
74th r
5 1
911•.4115th ST.
❑ v
5
o� e REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
Cn
y
v .a
f�COntpmX4 9
lase
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Francis Hoffman
City Engineer �l
Date: February 17, 1998
Subject: Cooperative Agreement
Traffic Control Signals
TH 169Nalley View Road
Interchange
Recommendation:
Agenda Item #
Consent
Information Only
Mgr. Recommends
Action
IVY.
❑ To HRA
® To Council
❑ Motion
® Resolution
.❑ Ordinance
❑ Discussion
Approve resolution to enter into cooperative agreement with Mn /DOT for traffic signals
at TH 169/Valley View Road interchange.
Info /Background:
At the March 4, 1996, City Council meeting, the City approved signal plans subject to
the City's local share being state -aid (see attached Council minutes). The state is now
ready to construct the signals and have submitted the cooperative agreement for the
project. The City pays for a portion of the project based on standard Mn /DOT policy for
construction. Staff agrees that the appropriate project splits have been applied. The
total estimated project cost is $307,260.00. Edina's share would be estimated at
$146,812.50. This portion would be funded through our state -aid allocation.
The resolution for approval is attached and staff will have the agreement available at
the Council meeting if any questions should arise.
Staff recommends approval as this was part of our transportation plan for 78th /Braemar
frontage program that the Council reviewed last year.
Following a brief discussion, the consensus was that the City Engineer crystallize Council's thoughts on
the proposal and submit them to MTG and Mn /DOT. It was further suggested the proposal be before
the Council again on March 18, 1996.
No recommendation was made or action required.
REAPPOINTMENTS /APPOINTMENTS MADE TO BOARDS /COMMISSIONS /COMMITTEES Motion
made by Member Paulus for consent of the Mayor's reappointment of individuals to advisory
boards /commissions /committees as follows:
Art Center Committee (3 year term to 2/1/99)
` Imogene Anderson, Dolores Dege, Elizabeth Eisenbrey
Community Health Services Advisory Committee (2 year term to 2/1/98)
JoAnn Blatchley, Mary Edwards, David Groth, Sharon Marx
Heritage Preservation Board (2 year term to 2/1/98)
John Cooney, Marilyn Curtis, Garold Nyberg
Human Relations Commission (3 year term to 2/1/99)
Robert Brandel, Shirley Hunt - Alexander, Sharon Ming, Hugh Wooldridge
Park Board (3 year term to 2/1/99)
David Crowther, Beth Hall, Andrew Montgomery, Jean Rydell
Planning Commission (3 year term to 211/99)
Nan Faust, Charles Ingwalson, Ann Swenson
Recycling and Solid Waste Commission (2 year term to 2/1/98)
Robert Reid, Ardythe Buerosse, Thomas Carrico
Regional Citizen Advisory Commission (SheRPA) (2 year term to 2/1/98)
Nancy Atchison, Glenn Smith
Zoning Board of Appeals (3 year term to 2/1/99)
Rosemary Utne
and appointments of individuals as follows:
Art Center Committee (3 year term to 2/1199)
George Kuebler
Community Health Services Advisory Committee (2 year term to 2/1/98)
J. Paul O'Connor, Freda Terry
Zoning Board of Appeals (3 year term to 2/1/99)
Meg Mannix, William Skallerud
Member Maetzold seconded the motion.
Ayes: Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
RESOLUTION APPROVING TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTALLATION AT TH 169 AND VALLEY VIEW
INTERCHANGE Engineer Hoffman stated Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn /DOT) is
planning to install new traffic signals at the east and west interchanges of Trunk Highway 169 and
Valley View Road. The plan would replace the existing traffic controller at the Washington Avenue and
Valley View Road intersection. The signal locations would be interconnected to provide maximum
efficiency.
Normally, the State pays for one -half the installation and maintains the signal system. The local agency
pays the other one -half plus electricity to run the system. Edina's share would be approximately 50%
of the installation costs and electricity to run the signals. This project includes the additional element of
replacing the Washington Avenue and Valley View Road intersection's controller. Eden Prairie
maintains the signal at Washington Avenue and Valley View Road while Edina provides electricity for
the signal.
Eden Prairie, Edina and Mn /DOT would enter into a cooperative construction agreement. The
agreement is not finalized, but the plans are being submitted for approval. Staff recommends approval
of the plans, requiring the interconnection of the new signals with the existing signal at Washington
Avenue and Valley View Road, and subject to Edina's local share coming from municipal state aid
funds.
Member Maetzold introduced the following resolution and moved approval:
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Plans for Minnesota Department of Transportation Project No. 2772 -6 and
Edina S.A.P. 120 - 010 -06, showing proposed traffic signal installation at the intersection of
Trunk Highway 169 and Valley View Road and interconnection with the existing Washington
Avenue signal within the limits of the City of Edina, have been prepared and presented to the
City.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED: That said plans be in all things approved and that
the City, agrees to approve plans to signalize the interchange of Valley View Road and Trunk
Highway 169 and the required interconnection of the new signals with the existing signal at
Valley View Road and Washington Avenue, subject to City of Edina's local share being
municipal state aid funds.
Member Maetzold seconded motion for adoption of the resolution.
Ayes: Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, Richards
Resolution adopted.
*CLUB ON -SALE AND SUNDAY LIQUOR LICENSE RENEWALS APPROVED Motion made by
Member Smith and seconded by Member Maetzold approving Club On -Sale and Sunday Liquor
License renewals for Edina Country Club and Interlachen Country Club.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - three ayes.
*ON -SALE WINE LICENSE RENEWALS APPROVED Motion made by Member Smith and
seconded by Member Maetzold approving on -sale wine license renewals for the following
restaurants: Byerly's Restaurant, Chico's Tacos, Ciatti's Italian Restaurant, Daytons Boundary
Waters Restaurant, Good Earth Restaurant, Hawthorn Suites, Mick's at Southdale, Original
Pancake House /My Pie, Pantry, Pizzeria Uno, Rossini's, Ruby Tuesdays, Sidney's, Tejas, Two
Guys From Italy, and Szechuan Star Restaurant.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - three ayes.
CLAIMS PAID Member Maetzold made a motion to approve payment of the following claims as
shown in detail on the Check Register dated March 1, 1996, and consisting of 30 pages: General
Fund $315,590.82; Community Development Block Grant $5,096.00; Communications $535.85;
Working Capital $7,345.49; Art Center $10,745.94; Golf Course Fund $44,849.42; Ice Arena Fund
$20,151.55; Gun Range Fund $114.35; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes $20,105.35; Utility Fund
$323,266.46; Storm Sewer Utility Fund $305.43; Recycling Program $39,966.57; Liquor
Dispensary Fund $142,751.21; Construction Fund $167.56; TOTAL $930,992.00. Member Paulus
seconded the motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Maetzold, Paulus, Smith, Richards
Motion carried.
There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Richards adjourned the meeting at 9:20
P.M.
City Clerk
RESOLUTION
BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Edina enter into an agreement with the State
of Minnesota, Department of Transportation for the following purposes, to wit:
To install new traffic control signals with street lights, emergency vehicle pre - emption
and signing on Trunk Highway No. 169 West and East Ramps at Valley View Road;
revise the existing traffic control signal with street lights on Valley View Road at
Washington Avenue; and install interconnect on Valley View Road from Trunk Highway
No. 169 East Ramps to Washington Avenue in accordance with the terms and
conditions set forth and contained in Agreement No. 74805, a copy of which was before
the Council.
IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and the Manager are authorized to
execute the Agreement.
CERTIFICATION
State of Minnesota
County of Hennepin
City of Edina
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of a
resolution presented to and adopted by the Council of the City of Edina at a duly
authorized meeting thereof held on the day of , 1998, as
shown by the minutes of said meeting in my possession.
Notary Public
My Commission Expires
(Signature)
(Title)
n
r' Wa
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Francis Hoffman f)AConsent
Agenda Item #
N.G.
City Engineer
Information Only
❑
Date: February 17, 1998
Mgr. Recommends
❑ To HRA
Subject: State Aid Variance Request -
ACtlon
® To Council
❑Motion
W. 78th Street
® Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Recommendation:
Authorize resolution to construct lane widths on W. 78th Street to 3.3 meters (11')
versus 3.6 meters (12') through state -aid variance process.
Info /Background:
A portion of W. 78th Street from Glasgow Drive west to the City border Oust west of
Gleason Road) has a 40 MPH speed limit. With the projected traffic and existing speed
limit, the geometric standard for a lane width is 3.6 meters or approximately 12 feet.
Our reconstruction project of W. 78th Street with Bloomington and DPS is in its final
design stages. During design, we have determined that we lack adequate right -of -way
to construct the larger facility (at 12 foot lanes).
Since the portion of the project east of Glasgow Drive to the railroad bridge requires
only 11 foot lanes, it does not seem logical to construct to the larger lane width for a
portion of the project. In talking with state aid personnel (plan approvers), they believe
it would be logical to construct to the eleven foot standard, but it may need a variance
to the published state aid operations rules. As such, staff would recommend that City
Council authorize the resolution so that the City Engineer may seek the variance if state
aid personnel conclude that one is needed.
The City has been granted two past variances. The first one was for Blake Road near
Mirror Lakes for a design speed variance, and in 1996, for a right -of -way variance on
Maloney Avenue.
'o e
i;✓ vl
RESOLUTION City of Edina
Directing the City Engineer to proceed with a variance request to the Commissioner of
Transportation for W.78 1h Street between Glasgow Drive and Gleason Road (S.A.P.
120- 160 -05).
WHEREAS, the City wishes to reconstruct W. 78th Street between Glasgow Drive and
Gleason Road in part using Municipal State Aid Funds; and
WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Transportation Rule 8820.9936 Geometrics
Design Standards requires that W. 78th Street between Glasgow Drive and Gleason
Road has a minimum lane width of 3.6 meters for a 40 MPH zone;
WHEREAS, the City believes there are valid reasons for constructing W. 78th Street to a
lower lane width (3.3 meters) standard and that such lower lane width standard will
safely and adequately handle existing and proposed traffic;
WHEREAS, the City is willing to sign an agreement to hold harmless the State of
Minnesota if the variance request is granted;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
EDINA, that the City Engineer be directed to submit to the Commissioner of
Transportation a formal request for variance for W. 78th Street between Glasgow Drive
and Gleason Road from the minimum lane width of 3.6 meters to 3.3 meters.
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby
certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the
Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of February
17, 1998, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 18th day of February, 1998.
Debra Mangen
City Clerk
City Hall (612) 927 -8861
4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 927 -7645
EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 927 -5461
ow1��11�,� REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
0
4
To: Mayor & City Council
Agenda Item #
N.H.
From: Francis Hoffman/' �j
N
Consent
City Engineer J
Information Only
❑
Date: February 17, 1998
Mgr. Recommends
❑ To HRA
® To Council
Subject: Change in State Aid Routes
Action
❑ Motion
® Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Recommendation:
Authorize designation of a new state aid route from TH 169/Valley View Road
interchange to W. Bush Lake Road and W. 78`h Street intersection.
Info /Background:
As part of the W. 78th Street traffic plan, the City needs to designate a new state aid
route. This allows for funding to be used from the state allocated gas tax. The
attached map depicts the portion that needs to be designated by the City of Edina. The
City of Bloomington also needs to dedicate a small portion west of W. Bush Lake Road.
This was discussed during the traffic study last year and should receive concurrence
from the City of Bloomington. The total route length for the new route in Edina would
be 1.45 miles. If this route is'authorized, the City of Edina and Bloomington would do
an exchange of approximately 0.3 mile along W. 78`h Street which would be Edina
roadway per the attached drawing.
Staff would recommend designation of the route with assumption that the balance of
the exchanges be worked out after designation by our City.
NEW STATE -AID EDINA EDINA
NEW STATE -AID BLOOMINGTON BLOOMINGTON
�---- ----
LIBERTY PROPERTY TRUST /DIVERSIFIED PHAR. SEP'
-- ------------- CURRENTLY BLOOMINGTON OWNED
i SIGNAL 6 INTERSECTION GEOMETRIC
RECONSTRUCTION COST SPLIT
WQ 78TH STREET-CORRIDOR COST SPLITS
1r�
o� e
co
Cafe �,�
..
• CORPOR.+2S9/
1808
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
Agenda Item #
iv.i.
From: Francis Hoffman ��
Consent
❑
City Engineer ; "i
Information Only
❑
Date: February 17, 1998
Mgr. Recommends
❑ To HRA
® To Council
Subject: Sump Pump Program
Action
® Motion
Inspection
❑ Resolution
❑ Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Recommendation:
Approve program to implement sump pump inspection project.
Info /Background:
As part of the overall program to reduce inflow to our public sanitary sewer system, a
sump pump inspection program is recommended by the City consultants. Staff agrees
with the recommendation and has been working with a consultant to develop a
program. This sump pump program is a specialty of this consultant.
The City has already conducted approximately 500 inspections during the initial TKDA
(consultant) analysis. Some revisits may need to be made to these homes. Otherwise,
it would be a home visit by trained inspectors in cooperation with the City's Building and
Engineering departments.
The City currently has a plumbing code which in essence makes it illegal to discharge
storm related water into the sanitary sewer. An additional ordinance should be put into
place to cover the entry to private property and cost for failure to comply with the
ordinance. A sample of a local ordinance is attached.
The program is expected to cost approximately $400,000.00 to fully implement. These
funds would be expended from the sewer and water utility in approximately eighteen
months. The cost for 1998 would be approximately $100,000.00 with the balance
expended in 1999.
A short synopsis of the program from our consultant is attached..
WATER, SEWERS AND SEWAGE DISPOSAL § 19.44
Sec. 19.44. Prohibited discharges into sanitary sewer system.
(a) No person shall discharge or cause to be discharged any substance not requiring
treatment or any substance not acceptable for discharge, as determined by the city or the
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency', into the sanitary sewer system. Only sanitary sewage
from approved plumbing fixtures may be discharged into the sanitary sewer system.
(b) No person shall discharge or cause to be discharged, directly or indirectly, any storm
water, surface water, ground water, roof runoff, subsurface drainage, or cooling water to any
sanitary sewer. Any person having a roof drain, sump pump, unauthorized swimming pool
discharge, cistern overflow pipe or surface drain connected and/or discharging into the sani-
tary sewer shall disconnect and remove any piping or system conveying such water to the
sanitary sewer system by May 1, 1994.
(c) All construction involving the installation of clear water sump pits shall include a
sump pump with minimum size one and one-half (11 /2) diameter discharge pipe. The pipe
attachment must be a rigid permanent type plumbing such as PVC or ABS plastic pipe with
glued fittings, copper or galvanized pipe. All discharge piping shall be installed in accordance
with the plumbing code. Discharge piping shall start at the sump pit and extend through the
exterior of the building and terminate with not less than six (6) inches of exposed pipe. The
discharge pipe shall be provided for all clearwater sump installations with no regard as to
whether the pump is actuary► installed. Sump pump discharge location and flow shall be
consistent with the approved development drainage plan for the lot. The discharge may not be
pumped directly onto any public right -of -way unless approved by the city engineer or his
designee. Any disconnects or openings in the sanitary sewer shall be closed and repaired in
compliance with applicable codes.
(d) Every person owning improved real estate that discharges into the city's sanitary
sewer system shall allow inspection by authorized city employees or its agents of all properties
or structures connected to the sanitary sewer system to confirm there is no sump pump or other
prohibited discharge into the sanitary sewer system. Any persons refusing to allow their
property to be inspected shall immediately become subject to the surcharge as described in
section (g) hereinafter.
(e) Any owner of any property found to be in violation of this section shall make the
necessary changes to comply with this section and such change shall be verified by authorized
city employees or its agents. Any property or structure not inspected or not in compliance by
May 1, 1994, shall, following notification from the city, comply within fourteen (14) calendar
days or be subject to the surcharge as provided in subsection (g) hereinafter.
(f) Upon verified compliance with this section, the city reserves the right to reinspect such
property. or structure at least annually to confirm continued compliance. Any property found
not to be in compliance upon reinspection or any person refusing to allow their property to be
reinspected shall, following notification from the city, comply within fourteen (14) calendar
days or be subject to the surcharge hereinafter provided for.
Supp. No. 7 1070.5
10002
.lQ 003
619-44 CHANHASSEN CITY CODE
(g) A surcharge of one hundred dollars ($100.00) per month is hereby imposed and shall
be added to every sewer billing, to property owners who are found not in compliance with this
section. The surcharge shall be added every month until the property is verified to be in
compliance through the city's inspection program.
(h) The city council, upop recommendation of the city engineer, shall hear and decide
requests for temporary waivers from the provisions of this section where strict enforcement
would cause a threat to public safety because of circumstances unique to the individual prop.
erty under consideration. Any request for a temporary waiver shall be submitted to the city
engineer in writing Upon approval of a temporary waiver from the provisions of this section,
the property owner shall agree to pay an additional fee for sanitary sewer services based on the
number of gallons discharged into the sanitary sewer system as estimated by the city engineer.
W Violation of this section is a misdemeanor and each day that the violation continues is
a separately prosecutable offense. The imposition of the surcharge shall not limit the city's
authority to prosecute the criminal violations, seek an injunction in district court ordering the
person to disconnect the nonconforming connection to the sanitary sewer, or for the city to
correct the violation and certify the costs of connection as an assessment against the property
on which the connection was made.
(Ord. No. 5, § 1.05, 3- 11.85; Ord. No. 108, § 9, 4.27 -92; Ord. No. 205, § 1, 5 -9 -94)
Sec. 19.45. Connection charges.
(a) No permit shall be issued to connect with the sanitary sewer system of the city either
directly or indirectly from any lot or tract of land unless the city clerk shall have certified:
(1) That the lot or tract of land, or portion of the lot or tract, to be served by such
connection has been assessed for the cost of construction of the sanitary sewer lateral
with which the connection is made; or
(2) If no assessment has been levied for said construction cost, that proceedings for
levying such assessment have been or will be commenced in due course; or
(3) If no assessment has been levied, and no assessment proceedings will be completed in
due course, that a sum equal to the portion of cost of constructing said sanitary sewer
which would be assessable against said lot or tract has been paid to the city as
outlined in subsection (b) below.
Supp. No. 7 1070.6
)ward R. Green Company
�SULTING ENGINEERS
Background/Introduction
Infiltration/ inflow (I /I) has long been a problem in municipal sewer
systems. However, it was not until the passage of the Clean Water Act
of 1972 that municipalities had either a financial or legal incentive to try
and identify, then correct, I/I flows. The Clean Water Act required
operators of municipal wastewater treatment facilities to remove I/I if
they desired to be part of the grant program that was implemented by the
Act. Unfortunately, the past twenty years have demonstrated that the
traditionally accepted I/I approaches do little to correct the problem.
The reason -for the lack .of success can be traced to the simple fact that
the vast majority of I/I is generated on private property, rather than in
the interceptor sewers that were the focus of the Clean Water Act. Most
municipalities have conducted I/I Reduction Programs on the public
sanitary sewers. The focus is now switching to the private I/I sources
such as sump pumps, services, and foundation drains.
History has shown us that the easily removed sources of I/I have long
since been repaired. With the rare exception of a major cross
connection to the storm sewer system or an interceptor sewer break, the
majority of I,iI now enters the sewer system through such private
property sources as foundation drains, sump pumps, and leaking sanitary
sewer service lines.
As a result of the severe rainstorm activities that occurred during the
month of July 1997, the City of Edina commissioned three studies to
analyze conditions and develop recommended solutions. The studies
included the following:
• Meteorological report analyzing rainfall events in Edina, Minnesota,
during 1997 by Mr. William Endersen.
• Stormwater analysis for City of Edina recommending changes to the
stormwater system as a result of the 1997 storms. prepared by Barr
Engineering.
• Evaluation of the City's sanitary sewer system completed by TKDA.
The City of Edina staff also analyzed flow records from the
Metropolitan Council Environmental Services. including flow data for
the summer of 1997.
Dward R, Green Company
�SULTING ENGINEERS
Background/Introduction
The purpose of all these analyses was to attempt to determine what may
have caused the severe flooding problems experienced in selected Edina
neighborhoods during the heavy rainfall conditions in July of 1997.
Also, the reports recommended steps to prevent the situation from
occurring in the future.
The meteorological report suggested that the summer storms of July
1997 were extremely unusual. They were different from the 1977 and
1987 storms in that the storms were of a shorter duration, but occurred
over a longer period of time. As a result, the City of Edina experienced
saturated soil conditions and much higher groundwater conditions than
normal.
The Barr Engineering report indicated that generally the stormwater
system is adequate to handle most conditions with several exceptions
noted. With minor regrading of several problem areas, most stormwater
improvements necessary are currently in place. The Barr report stated
that major flooding problems were caused by groundwater flow to the
sanitary sewer system. The groundwater reaches the sanitary sewer
from direct connections through basement floor drains. from interior and
exterior foundation drains, and also direct flow from seepage through
the walls and cracks. The most serious source of groundwater flow to
the sanitary sewer is from sump pump connections to the sanitary sewer.
Many sump pumps discharge directly to the floor drain, allowing clear
water to reach the sanitary sewer.
The sanitary sewer evaluation completed by TKDA notes that 60% of
the clear water in the Edina sanitary sewer system is from inflow. The
TKDA report identified three neighborhoods that experienced severe
flooding problems from sanitary sewer backups. These included the
Tower /Woodcrest area (sewer basin 6). St. Johns /Ashcroft area (sewer
basin 10). and the Limerick area (sewer basin 18). The TKDA report
noted that in these three neighborhoods. 50% to 75% of the sanitary
sewer capacity was used up by clear water from sump pump connections
to the sanitary sewer. As part of its study, TKDA conducted a selected
survey of approximately 500 homes. The results of the survey were as
follows:
Howard R, Green Company
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
Background/Introduction
• One -third of the homes surveyed have sump pumps in the basement.
• Twenty -three percent of the sump pumps are illegally connected to
the sanitary sewer.
• Forty-four percent of the surveyed homes had water problems. Of
the homes having water problems, 37% had problems relating to the
sanitary sewer.
The TKDA report suggests that 7% of the homes surveyed have sump
pumps illegally connected to the sanitary sewer system. The report
further suggests that, city-wide, a lower number, or 4%, could be
expected. It has been our experience in working in other communities
that the 7% number of illegal connections of sump pumps to the sanitary
sewer should be applied City-wide, not just in problem areas. Using this
number, for the 13,500 homes in Edina, approximately 945 can be
expected to have sump pumps illegally connected to the sanitary sewer.
Using a pumping rate of 10 gallons per minute with the sump pumps
running half -time, by completing a sump pump inspection program and
removing all of the anticipated illegal connections, 6,800,000 gallons of
clear water can be removed from the sanitary sewer system each day.
This is especially important during wet conditions when heavy rainfalls
are experienced and most of the sanitary sewer capacity is utilized for
clear water.
The TKDA report recommended several solutions to the clear water
problem. These included:
1. Projects to attenuate the peak flows to the sanitary sewer system.
2. Projects to divert flow from the sanitary sewer system.
3. Projects to increase conveyance system capacity.
4. An inflow reduction program, which would include:
■ A public education program.
■ A sump pump inspection program.
■ Programs to replace manhole covers and deteriorated
manholes.
• Television inspection and cleaning of the sanitary_ sewer
system.
Howard R. Green Company
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
Background/Introduction
■ Work on private property to correct locations where
stormwater is directly discharged to the sanitary sewer
system.
In order to effectively and efficiently reduce I/I as the TKDA report
outlines, it is necessary to implement a comprehensive program that
includes the identification and correction of sources found on both public
and private property. One such component is the sump pump inspection
program.
The private property portion of the problem is not simply related to
older portions of a city. Homes in newer developments located in
lower, more marginal land are likely to have wet basements.
Homeowners often install foundation drains and sump baskets because of
contractor requirements. This allows owners to install associated sump
pumps at a later date, in an effort to correct their problems because these
developments did not take this into account, and initially did not
construct a drain tile that connects with the storm sewer across the back
lot lines or behind the curb line. The homeowner is often left with two
choices: 1) drain the sump pump to the yard and continually repump the
water and /or kill their lawn, or 2) connect the drain to the sanitary
sewer. Even though it generally is against municipal ordinance to
connect the sump to the sanitary sewer line, plumbers often do so. The
only way to discover this illegal connection is to physically inspect each
property. Edina wishes to do this in the entire City, starting with
selected neighborhoods which experienced sewer backup and flooding as
a result of the heavy rainfalls in July 1997. The goal of this program
would be to identify improper sump pump connections in all
neighborhoods to improve sanitary sewer service to all Edina residents
and businesses. After identification of illegal sump pump connections, a
follow -up program would be necessary to provide discharge facilities for
the rerouted sump pump connections.
Howard R. Green Company
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
Recommended Project Approach
It has been our experience that sump pump inspection programs
of this type consist of a minimum of three phases: the first phase
is communication/education, the second phase is the actual
physical inspection, and the third phase consists of the final
reports and follow -up to develop other improvement projects to
correct identified problems. The first phase includes contacts
with residents, City Council, City staff, and local contractors and
plumbers. There are times when a community will consider
multi -year phases for the inspections due to constraints such as
budget and manpower. That is our recommendation for the City
of Edina. The program should be completed in two phases, over
18 months. Phase I would include inspections in late
winter /spring of 1998 in the three identified targeted problem
neighborhoods (2,500 -3,000 households). The balance of the
City would be inspected in the fall /winter of 1998 -1999 (10,500-
11,000± households).
1. COMMUNICATION /EDUCATION
Our Howard R. Green Company team will work closely
with the City of Edina staff to develop an understanding
of the local ordinance provisions, including reviewing
your local ordinances and suggesting changes required to
effectively implement a sump pump program. With this
background, we will be prepared to hold discussions with
selected local contractors to determine their current
practices regarding sump pump installation. and develop
alternate procedures where necessary to meet City
requirements. This will be followed by a general meeting
open to all interested plumbers and contractors where
information on the ordinance will be disseminated and
correct methods of compliance will be discussed.
For the general public. Howard R. Green Company
believes that a professional communication and advertising
program is essential to the successful completion of the
)ward R. Green Company
�SULTING ENGINEERS
Recommended Project Approach
City of Edina Sump Pump Inspection Program.
Inspectors will be able to do their jobs most efficiently
with the cooperation and assistance of informed and
educated homeowners. Our suggested approach would be
to combine public meetings, local access videos, printed
brochures and newsletters, press releases for print and
broadcast mediums, and paid advertising to communicate
to residents and business owners. This public education
program was also recommended in the TKDA report.
e
REPORURECOMMENDATION
TO: Mayor Smith and Members
of the City Council
From: John Keprios, Director
Park and Recreation Department
Date: February 12, 1998
Subject:
Appointment of
Inspector.
Assistant Weed
Agenda Item # IV. J
Consent X
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
X To Council
Action X Motion
❑ Resolution
❑ Ordinance
❑ Discussion
Recommendation:
Staff recommends that Lowell McCarthy be appointed to serve as
Assistant Weed Inspector for the calendar year 1998.
Info /Background:
Lowell McCarthy has served admirably as Assistant Weed Inspector for the
City of Edina during the years 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996 and 1997.
The duties of the Assistant Weed Inspector are to carry out the
enforcement of the City of Edina's Nuisance Ordinance with regards to
Section 1050 - Maintenance of Vegetation. The Assistant Weed
Inspector's duties primarily include identifying and eradicating noxious
weeds as defined by the State Commissioner of Agriculture and mandated
by State Statute. Duties also include identifying and cutting turf grasses
and weeds throughout the City of Edina that exceed ten inches in height
and are subject to City Ordinance Maintenance Standards under Ordinance
#1050.05.
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
NOTICE OF APPOINTMENT OF ASSISTANT WEED INSPECTOR
FOR CITY OR TOWNSHIP
INSTRUCTIONS
1) Complete this form.
2) Return to the County Agricultural Inspector;
Greg Serest
417 North Sth Street
Minneapolis, MN 55401
NAME OF PERSON APPOINTED APPOIN IMFINT LOCATION
Lowell McCarthy City of Edina
ADDRESS CITY OR TOWNSHIP NAME
6400 York Ave. S. Unit 617 Edina
CRY, STATE, ZIP CODE COUNTY
Edina, MN 55435 IENNEPIN
TELEPHONE! (INCLUDE AREA CODE) DATE OF APPORTIMENT
612 - 922 -5193 February 17, 1998
IN ACCORDANCE WRM MINNESOTA STATUTES 18.80, SUED. 3, PERTAINING TO ASSISTANT WEBD WSPEC ,'TORS,
THE ABOVE NAMI� PERSON 1S HffitFBY APPOINTED TO BE ASSISTANT WEED ] NSPEC, MR FROM DATE
INDICATED UNTIL SUCH A TVAE AS THE MAYOR OR TOWN BOARD WISHES TO TERMIINATH THE THE HE DATE .
THIS APPOMWE TP CONFERS ON THE APPORTM ALL THE DUTMs, AUTHORITY, AND PRIVILEGES OF ANY
LOCAL WEED INSPECTOR AS OUTLINED BY LAW.
SIGNA (MAYOR OR CHAIR OF TOWNSHIP BOARD) TRZ.E DATE SIGNED
�' `� L Mayor
STREET ADDRESS CRY AND STATE ZIP CODE
4801 West 50th Street Edina 55424
%-A
O
N
"cbxPOgw�y"
lees
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
TO: MAYOR AND COUNCIL
FROM: GORDON L. HUGHES
ASSISTANT CITY MGR
DATE: FEBRUARY 17, 1998
SUBJECT:
BOARD OF SOIL AND WATER
RESOURCES REVIEW OF
MINNEHAHA CREEK
WATERSHED DISTRICT
REPORT:
Agenda Item # IV.K.
Consent
Information Only
Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
® To Council
Action F-1 Motion
Resolution
Fj Ordinance
Discussion
Last September, the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners adopted
a Resolution requesting the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil
Resources to review the activities of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed
District. This Resolution was prompted by the requests of a number of
cities in the district (including Edina), for the County Board to investigate
the activities of the district. The Board of Water and Soil Resources has
now completed its investigation and has forwarded the attached report to
the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners. The report concludes that
the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District has not violated any applicable
statutes or rules and regulations. The report goes on to make some
recommendations to the Board of Managers of the Watershed District with
respect to communication to constituents, especially cities, and micro -
management by the Board of Managers.
No action is required of the City Council at this time. We will be glad to
provide additional information at your request.
Changes urged
for Minnehaha >*
rTJ
district board x
Q
A state investigation questions some
management practices at the A_
Watershed District, but also offers �
praise for the district's work.
By Mark Brunswick
Star Tribune Staff Writer
A state board has given favorable marks to the
Minnehaha Creek Watershed District but has
recommended that its board communicate
better and rely less on outside consultants and
lawyers.
The district, which coordinates water projects
from the tributaries of Lake Minnetonka and
along Minnehaha Creek to the Mississippi River,
was criticized last year by more than 15 Henne-
pin County suburbs.
The cities complained about poor manage-
ment and called for an investigation of the dis-
trict's operations, including high per -diem pay-
ments to managers and high engineering and
legal fees.
The County Board asked for an investigation
by the state Board of Water and Soil Resources.
The state board, in a report presented Tuesday to
the County Board, found no criminal wrongdoing
in the district's operations and generally gave the
district favorable marks for its work
"The board has been highly professional and
should be justifiably proud of itself and its ac-
complishments," said Ronald Harnack, executive
director of the state board. "The district has
shown significant leadership in comprehensive
water management."
But the state board did make several recom-
mendations. Among them:
> The Watershed District's managers should
shift from "micromanagement" style and allow
its professional staff to handle day -to -day activ-
ities.
> The district should improve communication
with constituents, especially cities.
> It should consider using additional engineer-
ing firms on capital improvement projects, or
city engineers as project managers.
While a financial audit found no irregularities,
the report raised some questions about expendi-
tures, particularly legal expenses and engineering
for capital improvement projects. It recom-
mends that some legal work be done by parale-
gals or a staff attorney.
Though slightly more than three times larger
than the three other watershed districts in Hen-
nepin County, the Minnehaha district's $5.3 mil-
lion 1998 budget is more than four times larger
than those of the other districts. Its legal ex-
penses are five times higher than those of the
next- highest district in the county, and the dis-
trict has the highest proportion of per -diem pay-
ments to managers, who receive no salary. One
manager, for example, was paid more than
$14,000 in per -diem payments.
Diane Lynch, administrator of the Watershed
District, said she was pleased with the results of
the state report, particularly portions that
showed that the district is following state stat-
utes and is financially sound.
County Commissioner Penny Steele, one of
the harshest critics of the district, said she is
satisfied with the state report but will continue to
monitor the district closely.
"My concern is that this is going to be re-
solved to the satisfaction of the citizen," she said.
County Commissioner Peter McLaughlin said
the report affirmed the Watershed District's
actions.
The 181 - square -mile district includes parts of
Hennepin and Carver counties, 27 cities and
three townships. It was established by the Legis-
lature in 1967 to preserve and protect water
quality and to control flooding :ft
Gray Freshwater Center
Hwys. 15 & 19, Navarre
Mail:
2500 Shadywood Road
Excelsior, MN 55331 -9578
Phone: (612) 471-0590
Fax: (612) 471-0682
Email:
admin @minnehahacreek.org
Web Site:
www.minnehahacreek.org
Board of Managers:
,n E. Thomas
President
C. Woodrow Love
Vice President
Pamela G. Blixt
Treasurer
Monica Gross
Secretary
Thomas W. LaBounty
Thomas Maple, Jr.
Malcolm Reid
District Office
Diane P. Lynch
District Administrator
Printed on recycled paper containing
at least 30% post consumer waste.
Minnehaha Creek ,.t Watershed District
Improving Quality of Water, Quality of Life
MEMORANDUM
DATE: February 6, 1998
TO: City Administrators
Chair, Board of Supervisors, Town Board
FROM: Diane Lynch, District Administrator t��00�
RE: Board of Soil and Water Resources (BWSR) Review of
Minnehaha Creek Watershed District
Last summer, a number of the cities in our watershed district passed
resolutions asking the Hennepin County Board to look into a number
of matters regarding the watershed district. The County Board
determined they were not the appropriate body to do a review and
requested the Board of Soil and Water Resources to conduct the
study.
The study is completed. Although BWSR distributed the report to all
the municipalities and townships within our district, many of the city
officials I have talked to have not seen it.
Enclosed are three sets of copies for your office. The set includes
the following:
•Report to the Hennepin County Board of
Commissioners on the Minnehaha Creek Watershed
District 1/26/98
*internal BWSR Memorandum regard_ ing Minnehaha
Creek's Financial Statements (this is in addition to the
State Auditor's review mentioned in the Report)
eBWSR News Release
eMCWD News Release
Please distribute a copy to your Mayor /Chair of Supervisors and.
Public Works Director.
If you have any questions, please contact me at 471 -0590.
Thank you!
-LO 70t1ILUI 14•J0 )nrwuiiiva/ur&r,,) uar iGL•u1L oJJ uuV4 r. uui
Gray Freshwater Center
Hwys. 15 819, Navarre
Mail:
2500 Shadywood Road
Excelsior, MN 55331 -9578
Phone: (612) 471 -0590
Fax: (612) 471 -0662
Email:
admin@minnehahacreek.org
Web Site:
www.minnehW2creek.org
Board of Managers:
John E. Thomas
President
C. Woodrow Love
vice President
Pamela G. Blixt
Treasurer
Monica Gross
Secretary
Thomas W. LaBounty
Thomas Maple, Jr.
Malcolm Reid
District Office:
Dlane P. Lynch
District Administrator
m P11n1" en fKYCWd 0UW C0flZ"M
Minnehaha Creek 0 Watershed District
Improving Quality of Water, Quality of Life
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact Diane Lynch, MCWD
471 -0590
or Marcy Lehbnen, Shandwick
831 -9080
Watershed District Gets Clean Bill of Health;
Considers Recommendations Very Helpful
EXCELSIOR (Jan. 28, 1998) — The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) was
given a clean bill of regulatory and financial health and generally - praised as "showing
significant leadership in comprehensive water management" in a report by the Minnesota
Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR) to the Hennepin County Board. In its report,
dated Jan. 26, BWSR made several administrative and operational recommendations but
also said it "recognizes and commends the district for the dedication and commitment of
its board of managers, staff and consulting engineers and attomeys. The district is highly
professional and is justifiably proud of its accomplishments."
District Administrator Diane Lynch says MCWD is pleased the several -month
study is completed, and will use the report as a foundation for improvements in several
areas. "Because we are proud of our record of improving the district's quality of water
and quality of life, as well as our stewardship of public funds, we welcomed this review,"
she says. "We will carefully consider the recommendations in their entirety.*
Lynch points out that many changes already have been made that will address
BWSR's specific recommendations, including: .
• Aggressively expanding communication efforts with cities and other constituents
through one - on-one meetings, circulating planning documents to wider audiences,
and conducting more preliminary meetings with stakeholders to anticipate and resolve
conflicts. We also are broadening distribution of general watershed information
regarding consumer education and watershed activities.
• Expanding a bidding policy to solicit proposals for managing specific construction
projects.
-more-
unn. .0 JokIILiul 1't v0 ollhou III vaiULALJ uRr
ILV•01L OJJ UUJ4 r.uuJ
Watershed District Gets Clean Bill of Health /2
• Reviewing construction project plans with the Hennepin and Carver County Boards
and seeking their approval before implementation. This is in addition to conducting
extensive public hearings prior to county review.
Reassigning staff job responsibilities to manage a.higher workload resulting from less
reliance on board managers and consultants. This includes hiring a part-time
bookkeeper and interviewing candidates for one administrative staffer and one project
manager.
During the past,year. MCWD hired Lynch, a professional with extensive public
policy, conflict management and environmental issues management credentials, following
the retirement of former director Gene Strommen; revised the Districts per -diem policy to
eliminate. duplication of efforts by staff and the board of managers; worked with citizen
advisory committees on major water quality projects; and established a task force to
improve implementation of the District's controversial stormwater management rule.
During the past two years, the Districts budget has declined. An average
property owner contributes to MCWD an amount•equivalent to the cost of taking a family
of four to a movie.
MCWD was established to improve water quality and control flooding, using a
regional approach that no individual city or county can take. "MCWD has generated
measurable results in water quality, received the "Watershed of the Year" award in 1996
from the Department of Natural Resources, and was praised last summer for its role in
helping to minimize flooding along Minnehaha Creek.
"We invite you to contact our office with questions, or. to check out our web site
(www.minnehahacreek_org) for more information," Lynch says.
News Release
For immediate release:
Tuesday, January 27, 1998
For further information cast:
Jim Haertel 612 /297 -2906
Minnesota Board of Mater and Soil Resources, One West Water St., Suite 200, St. Pau], MN 55107
BWSR ISSUES REPORT ON MIN14EHAHA CREEK WD
A report issued today by the-Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR) on
the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) makes several recommendations but
indicates that the BWSR uncovered no district wrongdoing.
Among the BWSR's recommendations are:
-The MCWD board of managers sbouid ,shift its management style away from `micro
management;"
-The MCWD should rely more on :stafiand possibly hire additional staff;
-The MCWD should improve communications with cities;
-The MCWD should hold an annual meeting with member cities and counties to discuss
upcoming capital improvement projects; and
-The MCWD should consider using-more than one engineering firm.
"Essentially, our investigation'revealed that the district is doing a good job," said Ron
Harnack, executive director of the BWSR.. "Of course, there are always improvements that can
be made, and we highlighted those in our recommendations."
The State Auditor also reviewed the districts's financial statements from 1994, 1995 and
1996 and found them, "clean."
(mare)
The Hennepin County Board triggered the,BWSR's investigation last fall when it
Du. Ui water/5oi i Kes. rdX OlL- Lyr -JOlJ Jail GO 70 LJ GG r. Vii l
Report to the
Hennepin County Board-of Commissioners.
on the
Minnehaha Creek Watershed District
January 26, 1998
INTRODUCTION
The Minnesota Board of Water and Soil. Resources. provides this report in response to a
request, passed on September 23, 1997,An.the foim of ResalutionNo. 97- 9- 62483, by
the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners.
The resolution requested the Board of Water and Soil Resources to:
(A) determine if the activities of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (district)
are in compliance with statutes, rules, and regulations;
(B) facilitate dialogue between the district and affected municipalities;
(C) determine if the cost effectiveness of capital projects proposed by
the district is in compliance with statutes, rules, and regulations; and
(D) request the State Auditor to audit the district to. address issue (A) or (C), if
necessary.
In addition to addressing these concerns, this report will alto, present various guidelines and
perspectives on the roles and responsibilities involved in watershed district management.
Although reports of this type inevitably focus on recommended improvements, the Board of
Water and Soil Resources recognizes and commends the district for the dedication and
commitment of its board of managers, staff and consulting engineers and attorneys. The district
is highly professional and is justifiably proud of its accomplishments. District staff and managers
were cooperative and accommodating throughout this study.
The Board of Water and Soil Resources gathered information several different ways for this
report. Interviews were conducted with various staff members from several cities in the district.
uu. wa�Ci gull RCS. c0 :_10 LJ•GJ
Past and present district staff were also interviewed. Interviews were conducted with citizen and
environmental groups, non - district consulting engineers.and attorneys, other metro. watershed
district managers -and staff, and-select state -agency -staff: In addition; many, district records were
reviewed, including an exhaustive review of the Long Lake project and reviews of the Gray's
Bay Dam Outlet, Gleason Lake, Painter Creek, and Langdon•Lake projects. Staff from the Board
of Water and Soil Resources also. reviewed the. 1994 Management Study and the 1997 Draft
Strategic Plan, both of which the district commissioned. Lastly, the State Auditor reviewed the
audited financial statements of the district for fiscal'years 1994, 1995,,and 1996.
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
Based. on all the information gathered, the Board, of Water and Soil Resources'concludes that the
district has not violated anyapplicable statutes, rules and regulations. In addition, the district has
shown significant leadership in comprehensive water management.
However, a number .of concerns -did arise during. our research for this report; primarily in two
areas: micro management by the Board of Managers and lack of District communication with
stakeholders or constituents, especially cities. Additionally, the issue of accountability for
expenditure of public funds was raised as a, concern by some interviewees.
Although some of these concerns. are already being addressed through recent administrative
changes, including hiring a new administrator„ our review suggests impFoveinents focused on
district management; district operational procedures; district outreach, communication and
coordination; and financial accountability.
DISTRICT MANAGEMENT.
The board, of managers for the district had a history of being dedicated and running the
operations "hands -on" during the first 25 years. The district had no staff, choosing instead to use
engineering and legal consultants. In 1992, two staff positions were established; a full time
administrator and a half-time clerical.
Since then, the board of managers has not-completely shifted its focus and priorities from.day -to-
day management of operations to that of being a policy and oversight body. Too many and
lengthy meetings result. Too often managers function individually and give administrative
direction to staff, or opinions to constituents; without full board awareness and approval. Further,
the district administrator and staff should be working directly with the constituents without
excessive oversight from individual managers.
Oftentimes constituents are uncertain who to contact at the district level. Members of the district
staff are generally seen as not empowered to make decisions, except the most simple or basic
2
uu. W wa601 i,>JI I (CGZ). Ca.l'ViG' -L7f -JVIJ JQII GU 7o L,) r. Von 11
types, so district consultants or managers are contacted directly. District staff have been pulled in
many different directions by individual contact from managers,. resulting in conflicting direction
and overworked situations. Certainly the practice undeimines -employee morale; turnover rate of
district staff has been high.
Two recent management studies the district commissioned corroborate.this finding and point to
the need for correcting micro management by the board of managers. In fact, the 1997 draft
strategic plan shows six of the seven managers spoke of micro management and the problems it
created. This also underscores the need for strong leadership- by county boards in choosing
managers that will cooperate together and work as a team.
COMMUNICATION, OUTREACH; COORDINATION
District communications with stakeholders, especially the member cities, needs to be improved.
Communication would likely improve if the board of managers will step back and allow district
staff to conduct routine communications with constituents. The district would speak with a more
uniform voice, reduce the likelihood of sending mixed messages, and reduce false expectations
among constituents.
Nevertheless, it takes two partiecommunicating s openly communic to make the situation work.
Constituents, such as cities, oftentimes do not put enough effort into the process. This was very
evident when the district-actively solicited comments from member cities during the
development of the second generation watershed management plan. Most substantial comments
from cities only arose during the very final stages of plan review by the state agencies, resulting
in a reactive, rather than proactive, approach. It is also evident there are some situations where
cities attempt to downplay water resources management concerns such as erosion control
measures or on -site water detention. This may occur in commercial projects as the result of
pressure from developers or in cities' own public works projects as they try to complete them in
a timely and cost - effective manner. In those cases,.-the district is unfairly criticized for
monitoring non - compliance and refusing to relax its standards.
The Board of Water and Soil Resources,has proposed using. the services of a state mediator to
help facilitate a dialogue among the cities and the district. This option will continue to be
explored and assessed along with the adoption and implementation of these recommendations.
We understand that the district administrator and a manager are in the process of meeting
individually with staff of all cities in the district. While. generally. viewed by constituents as a
step in the right direction, there is. some concern about the need for, or desirability of, having a
manager present. Again, city staff do not see district .staff as being empowered by the board of
managers to carry out their assigned duties, or what most would agree should be a staff duty.
L,-4- -j wdLP_ / J0 1 1 RCS. Jan Lo -lo _., .44 r. ur / 1 f
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Another area of-concern revolves around,capital improvement projects and taxation -to cover the
planning and implementation of the projects. Comments from all people interviewed varied
regarding the taxation issue, but the need for the projects, or similar projects, goes largely
unchallenged. The Board of Water and Soil Resources found no evidence that the cost
effectiveness of capital improvement. projects is not in compliance with statutes, rules, and
regulations..
The issue of who should pay for the.projects, or where taxes should be levied and to what extent,
is the subject of considerable debate and a,primary focus of concern for some cities. Opinions on
solutions span a vast range and include: (a) fund all projects by an ad valorem district -wide tax is
is presently the case; (b) fund major projects -of.regional importance by an ad valorem district -
wide tax and fund smaller projects on a subwatershed district basis; (c ) divide the district into
two tax districts, divided at Gray's Bay dam; (d) continue as is presently the case but spread the'
projects around so many cities have a.project in.their area; and. (e) fund projects by a combination
of an ad valorem district -wide tax and create, a subwatershed district or stormwater utility district
for the area directly benefitting or contributing, e�g., 74 percent of the project cost levied over the
area directly benefitting or contributing and 34 percent ad valorem over the remainder of the
district. .
Defining the appropriate funding option is.a district responsibility and a matter of policy. Greater'
proactive participation by city and county policy makers and staff in the plan development
process would create greater awareness and understanding of the options`
FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY
The cost of capital improvement'projects is an area of concern, specifically the cost of
engineering and, to a lesser extent,-.legal services for the projects. The expense of engineering
consultants and legal consultan ts for other district activities is also an area of concern raised by
several people interviewed.
It does appear that the district could reduce net operating expenses by_ hiring some professional
staff. A staff engineer and a staff attorney or paralegal could reduce expenses in the areas of
permits and planning and a staff engineer would be helpful in monitoring engineering consultant
costs. In addition, since the district does not have a staff attorney or engineer, individual
managers are assigned.to implementation of individual capital improvement projects, furthering
the problem -of board members performing tasks that should be done by staff.
Several interviewees also recommended using different engineering firms to design capital
improvement projects. Under this scenario, the district would still maintain a single consulting
engineering firm for district activities, but would.vary the engineering firms used for capital
4
uu. Q WaLCI / )uI I i GA•UL4- GPI ->OlJ JGII Lv ,O LJ GJ r. Uo/ 11
improvement projects, either through a bid process or by rotation within a pool of firms. Other
suggestions include relying more on the Hennepin Conservation District; and using the city
engineer as the project manager, instead of an engineering, consultant. This -latter suggestion
would also address the cities' perception of a lark of coordination and information dissemination
at the project implementation stage. While we don't know if-these suggestions would decrease
costs, they would definitely decrease the risk of communication breakdowns.
The 1994 management study stated the need for the district administrator. to monitor consultant
costs. This has been implemented over the past few months.
Reviews of the District's 1994, 1995, and 1996 financial statements by the State Auditor
essentially yielded the same, information as the audit reports by the CPA firms, namely, an
unqualified "clean" opinion.
RECOMMENDATIONS
In summary, the Board of Water and Soil Resources recommends the following:
I.
II.
A. The board of managers should shift their management style from being involved in
many details of district operations, towards being a policy and oversight body, as
presented in the "District Management" section on pages 2 and 3.
B. The board of managers should assign district staff.and empower district staff to carry
out most of the operational functions and administrative. services, as presented in the
"District Management" section on pages 2 and 3.
C. The district should rely more on staff in the areas. of permits and planning, which may
require additional staff, as presented in the "Financial Accountability" section on pages 4
and 5.
A. The district should improve communications with. constituents, especially cities, as
presented in the "Communication, Outreach, Coordir ation'' section on page 3.
B. The district should hold an annual meeting with the cities and. counties to discuss
capital improvement projects on line for the coming year and try to achieve. broad
agreement among the patties on sources offunding for the projects.
DU. UT WaLdF /0011 KeS. rdX ;01L- L7(-J01J Jdil LO 70 1J LJ r.Uvilr
III. The district should consider using additional engineering firms or the Hennepin
Conservation District on capital improvement project design, as presented under the
"Financial Accountability" section on pages 4. and 5.
IV. The district should consider using city engineers as project managers, as presented in the
"Financial Accountability" section on pages 4 and 5.
V. Hennepin County should establish "guiding principles and standards" for.selecting
managers and judging performance
VI. Cities that have not already done so should designate a technical and policy
representative to act as liaison with the district. .
CONCLUSION
Managing water resources in a responsible and effective mariner is extremely. challenging. In
today's urban setting this challenge is made even more complex by the many political boundaries
that are crossed. The large population center of the Minneapolis area, the wealth of water
resources, including such regionally significant ones as. the Chain of Lakes, Minnehaha Creek,
and Lake Minnetonka, coupled with the-primarily agricultural nature of the upper reaches of the
watershed combine to make• the district's job very complicated and yet extremely important. The
district has shown innovative leadership.. While the Board of Water and Soil Resources has made
some recommended changes, the overall job the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District has done
in the management of such important waters has been, for all purposes, quite satisfactory.
In conclusion, the Board of Water and-Soil Resources offers assistance to work with Hennepin
County, the district, and the cities. towards establishing a strong framework for watershed
management within the Minnehaha .Creek Watershed District.
2
W. OT water/5oil Res. rax:t)12 -21j7 -5615 Jan 26 '98 1321 r.01 /i�
Board of Water and Soil Resources
Metro Region
- - One- West Water - Street -
Suite 250
St. ,Paul, Minnesota 55107
Phone: 282 -9969
Fax: 297-5617
Page 1 of 17
Date: January 26, 1998
To: Diane Lynch
471 -0682
Louis Smith
344 -1550
From. Jim Haertel
Ph: 297 -2906
If you have any transmission problems, please. contact Joan Anderson at 296 -3767.
DO. or water/�>oti, t<es. rax —Delb jan Lb "y6 U21ir
One West Water Street
Suite 200
St. Paul. MN 55107
(612) 296 -3767
Fax(612)297.5615
Field Offices
Northern Region:
394 S. Lake Avenue
Room 403
Duluth. MN 55802
(218) 723 -4752
Fax (218) 723 -4794
3217 Bemidji Avenue N.
Bemidji, MN 56601
(218) 755 -4235
Fax (218) 755 -4201
217 S. 7th Street
Suite 202
Brainerd. MN 564013660
(218) 628 -2383
Fax (218) 828 -6036
Southern Region:
261 Highway 15 S.
New Ulm, MN 56073-8915
(507) 359 -6074
Fax (507) 359 -6018
40 -16th Street SE
Suite A
Rochester, MN 55904
(507) 285 -7458
Fax(507)280 -2875
Box 267
1400 E. Lyon Street
Marshall, MN 56258
(507) 537 -6060
Fax (507) 537 -6368
Metro Region:
One West Water Street
Suite 250
St. Paul. MN 55107
(612)282 -9969
Fax(612)297 -5615
An equal opportunity employer
Printed on recycled paper
January 26, 1998
Board of Hennepin County Commissioners
A -2400 Government Center
Minneapolis, MN 55487 -0244
Dear Commissioners:
The Board of Water and Soil Resources has completed the enclosed report on the
Mitnnehaha Creek Watershed District as requested by resolution no. 97- 9- 624R3.
which was adopted by the County Board on September 23, 1997. Also enclosed
is- a memorandum from the office of the state auditor.
Although no violation of applicable statutes, rules and regulations was found, the
report offers several recommendations. The Board of Water and Soil Resources
will continue to. work with the District, and cities, to implement these
recommendations.
It is evident that the District has made. some significant changes over the past
several months. We are also aware that the District is presently in the process of
implementing some of the recommendations brought forth in the report. Cities
have been generally satisfied with the progress, made by the stormwater task force
dealing with Rule B.
It is our intent. to keep the, momentum - going, and foster better working
relationships with the District, cities and the county.
Please feel free to contact Jim Haertel of my staff at 297 -2906 should you wish
to discuss this matter further.
Sincerely,
Ronald D. ack
Executive Director
Enclosures
cc's on attached page
Da. OT water/Z)Oii Res. raX b1L- Lyf-Dblb jan Lo _io UJilf
cc: Cities and Townships in District
District Board of Managers
Diane Lynch; District Administrator - -- - - - - - - - -- —
Louis Smith, District Counsel
Mike Panzer, District Engineer
Vern Genzlinger, Hennepin County Public-.,Works Director
Janet Leick, Hennepin County Environmental. Services Manager
Roger Williams, Office of Dispute Resolution
Kathleen Docter, Office of the State Auditor
BWSR Staff: Birkholz, Thomas, Haertel, Sandstrom
•
W. UT Water/J011 reS. raX.OlL- L7r-DOIJ Jal [O 70 1J L0 r.julit
Pecrivelu
interoffice. °EC221997
• MEMORANDUM
To: Jim Haertel
From: Tom Karlson
Subject: Minnehaha Creek-Natershed
Date: December 19, 1997
Finally, I have completed some notes on my review of the 1994, 1895, and 1996'audited financial
statements for the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. I did some. comparison of revenues,
expenditures, and fund balances over the years.. Attached are my observations from reviewing the
reports and some schedules comparing the years..
The notes are not arranged in any particular order. Please call if you have any questions.
LU. U f mdS. raX •OLL -Lyf -JO1J Jdil GO yo 1.) - Lo r'. 11/ if
Review of 1Viinnehaha Watershed District
•
Financial ,Statements far 1994,1995 and 1996
Annual Audit:
The District was audited by CPA firms.for each year reviewed. In 1994 the firm was Larson Allen
Weishair & Co. In 1995 and 1996 the -firm was Babcock, Langbein and Company. My personal
experience has been that I have been more impressed by the quality of reports issued by Larson
Allen Weishair & Co. than the latter firm.
Independent Auditor's Report:
In all three years the District received an unqualified "clean ". opinion on -their financial statements.
In other words it was the auditors' opimion thit the financial statements were fairly presented in all
material respects. There were a couple minor errors in the wording-for the 1995 and 1996 opinions.
Other auditor Reports:
The audits were conducted under Government A.udiring. Standords, issued. by the Comptroller
General of the US. These standards. require. reports. on internal control and compliance to be issued.
For all three years these reports were issued. These reports -indicate that the auditor's had no issues
of noncompliance that were required to be issued and no material reportable conditions. In the 1996
Babcock, Langbein actually erred by staring they noted no reportable conditions. This�Aactually a
violation of auditing standards. (Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards AU § 326.17).
What all the above means is that the firms reported no findings or recommendations related to their
audits of the District. In some cases CPA, firms issue separate management letters directly to
mangement. There is. no indication that they have done this, but you may want to ask the District
if they have received separate letters.
Financial Statements:
A few minor presentation errors noted in the 1.995 and 1996 financial statements. However, nothing
too critical. The one curious item is that the .General (Administrative) Fund in 1995 had a
$3,000,000 certificate of deposit that it did not have in ,1994. The revenues of the General Fund were
only $265,000 so they were not the source of this investment. It came, from the Special Revenue
Funds, in particular the tax revenues of the Management Planning Fund. The General Fund does
have a liability to the Special Revenue Funds, but the interest earned on the project revenues are
being used to eliminate the General Fund's deficit.
Do. 61 WdLef /J011 Nes. jan Lo yo 1J-LO h'.
Fund Balances:
46 From the schedule of fund balances you can see that the financial condition hit a low ' 4. At
y to 199
that time the District-had an overall.deficit of $115,494. The overall deficit was due to the large
$324,004 in the General Fund. The condition of the General Fund has improved aver the last two
years. Two other funds also had deficits at the end of 1996. The project revenues of the
Management Planning Fund are responsible for the healthier looking total fund balance. The deficits
result from expending funds without current revenue sources.
Revenues:
No major observations on revenues.. Property taxes_ are their primary source of revenue. Total
revenues of course increased due to the large projects started in 1995.
Expenditures:
As was the case with revenues,, expenditures have increased in the last two years due to the large
projects. The largest expenditure has been for engineering, which is probably understandable due
to the nature of their purpose. 'Possibly, more unusual is the large amount of legal expenditures,
which have ranged from about 10% of total expenditures to a high of 26% in 1.994. On the issue of
managers' per diem, they have increased each year from $22,436 in 1993 to $60,423 in 1996. On
the flip side coordinator's expense has dropped from $79,620 in 1993 to, $11,201 in 1996. An
No unusual item was a negative expenditure in 19951abeled "Returned Wayzata Check" for $175,540.
Generally should not have negative revenue or expenditure amounts.
Summary:
Reviewing financial statements will not necessarily address the concerns raised about the District.
Based on no findings and clean opinions on the financial statements there are no major red flags that
were noted from our review of the financial statement reports: There are just some areas identified
above that may require additional information to determine if there is anything to be concerned
about.
do. of Water/5oii i<es. rax-oil -[ -Doi5
Jan 2e 'y� 1��1r r.l5iir
Mlnnehaha Creek Watershed District
Review of Financial Statements
Fund Balances 1993 to 1996
General
Management,
Water
Survey
Gleason
Administrative
Planning. .
Maintenance
and Data
Creek
Fund Balance - December 31
Total
:Fund
Fund
and Repair
Acquisition
Fund
(192,578)
3,845,363
84.913
(1,420)
(207,5,75
1996
I 3.528.703.
1995 _
! 3.042 ,184
(281242)
3.427,604
79,503
3.875
(207.578
1994
i 115,494
. (324,004)
108,504
70,970 ,
24,200
6,836
1993
236,804
(277.597)
459;385
73,626
41.594
(60,204
1992
192.3461.
(239,530)
441,515
112.790
881
(123,310
or
i-
0
a...A.0 CW.A mwoha Dl--&A
111.0— drk—..d SLA—t.
P— Im a. Me
"w-qw—w
Wb. $--I Cal
X
Carr Mr vew
.69144.
1"6
% IM 6.
ab
C-t!al
IIPW 1.
Tm
%
Chg...
dd T"d
JOAT*lb*A"
FWWfA9
Mabdm WAGala cf.&
dT.W
J.—v S--y
Ad,,-00— Pg. .6 MAAv W Oda
-
l"d
F.0 Fwd maple*.& Amon
F�d
34 O�L
20
201.01Z 3.U*.%3 ll.m
154 ft
0. M
2
(W21"
-Pam SA"
3,3%
11.251
I&sfL
1.274
zs.M
1%2%
SASG
"RIS
M
---
lcd. 3
103.3al
--m iu ate
24.130 2"
WPM
. dial
MR
of
.446
0
ol
'A
I FtA
:RA
--- 0
a
EKR
IFM
_'6
a
0
EFiR
DAM
20 6
3
weal
R- CIe.N..1.o
Pf "V W M
Umaa ..e,�m..
rti.l�.ad
G—d
I4w.e.m.A
Mots Gr w
fl.u+rl
II.O.t/.0
l4...IwwW wdo"
GM!
1
G.nar V+a.a�y
elan
Vi4W
$--I
ca_
N.It4
It
.17.W
AA.Mh.r..
4e.A„
YAran
dDA.
Oro
4,262
.a fay
7uW
e_
f...e
F..a
. d "�.
�.�,
►r4
rwl
e......
I.GU.w
87, F%
1"Jae
401,5:.
15.10
!
MOGS
1,574=
- -ai
»eel
.._ ! IN
W=
MY4
al
•1,4x1
I.tl►
HAWN
IISq
_ 1 eil
1?1s
L'.4e
in
1.4A9
JEW
—
o
I;l43n�
Iwoxl--
754.r}
4sale►
, la1»
4,uA
geq,�lr
,�Zuywl_ im.<
G—d
I4w.e.m.A
Mots Gr w
fl.u+rl
II.O.t/.0
l4...IwwW wdo"
GM!
!!A-P.6 A W-J, .
-aw
elan
16.318 4$j=
area
N.It4
a 141
!!an
m :d17
"A
4a1
4,262
N1 141
f.e
SSn
II,=
tore
v
PLT
—7
ldw.d.a. C..A VAUrp.4 qb&_j
0-6— .9 Fbu,.dW sb&—u
Up_dbs Mae. Me
1494
I
Chats Yr.
ows
IS
CA_."ft_
IV" 1.
16
ck—" b—
It 1.
IS,
IoW
Ad—.*.b-
G—rd
as—w—
pt.- lh-id�
G1.
IL
G—d M-.V.Od
VWlw Wxvy Gk=
Cho,
tr__W_LM=
A_____
F-8
I"—
atom
A**"
P"
.
!6e!T!t_
FWd
r.W
W
(MASA
47AIL
5A4ii
RAPS5
10274
221ACC
519,A
swiaw
-74.1m
11OA47
SuAll Iasi
—1.3if4b
SW
114.167
K22"
[Oki"
(4.144
it K
(40105
[51.116
-fobi
-joixi
7311100
T1 i.sed
DISK
16*
UIAI
hit
U."s
$39
aslns
—JIM
ill SK
77,424
287.9"
122 •20,1150
2.100
9343
RK
161S9
- 'Uti
4_8 Aft
-W
611-04
51 A
27%
;OAQI
IGA9R
23.131
50.400
432I
10.623
"a
(!.&Ie
-!*8 bA
10
-66i
-
77264
23.216
102%
-3iN
IA6
745w
ERA
4id"
S>4i
Em
E FbA
cl A
4
ON
�s
1.010
_(1 1,671
.g _iill
215.1il
31411,14
TK
bill
EAR
11'46D,SI
1,904
21cs
____ .
Irs, W
tool)
25.360
20
15.963
flikk
jiken
Ibiig
_EAA
j jae
'I
ziL v-K
L,
24114
049
6.123
I:A1Q
awbiiiii
lj?s
lot
1"-24
P4
I"An
ANSI
13:
_Aalil
fad _c_
ICASI
-
am
.
- M
-
O
an
FA4
330
bkh
it
-fs
42%
*1P
- 3AIB
.
irsm
63a
- -
112
9716
_SAI
_f
a
....
PA
i
'10%
-6
---E"
5.630
sit
ivii
Z3fs7C
tAR
I'sal
AM
2116.51i
MX4
1.193
23%
es <m
Ispis
411i*
ERR
06%
tie
v.M3
ON .
HASS
_44
. _
ifivi
—
___ IN34
ii�!
IlAu
51 is
,tae
24N4
A,Ia6
birk
-bFtFi
-Amw
-_ -A
L
.",rs
__L
oor
a
46
--a
To
--its
W
,3i
3
,16
A92%
�.igi
4907 11A
336
0
Clio
_hl itiL
b'
aj
0'077
OWN
4.313
4.141
X4 SIA
ERR
•
--Goll
1.46J
__7TF_A
--9.364
fivi
, - --lus-
tips
I ZA
Milo
IL
am
(AAir
I-iS2 A
—ow
1.1112
ld.wo
OWNS
li.a$
lI.nI
129132
sisju
a
as
• CL3;
bin
EAR
3l.rJ6
1411AI
0.045
IMILK
-kA
-gr
.171
If.rol
soft
S.W.
6x66
a"
Ifila
too&%
ga
cm
to
CF#
pitlof
X,A
EM
J.092,510
E
�,_qM
100,K
"11 =1d1
17301
77.451
t A6
Aw
44 006370 owl
0 '_1254ft
•=00
.r--
0%
lost% 2D
_IU
IS
G- as 7/. gm-t
vfmw
Gk. -
Y
Gi d 16r1.P--6
lawn e....t
CL% .
-
.11.+r Adnnataa..
"
Fl
bwbu a.
wEIA.
Ger
(T"d
wanes..
rw.&y
Y.i11e..r... .n00.1.
fi.r
-
EY`'ra•Cls.e.lr.1
bW
E.P- -" ..
F.s
Md
"I"
AD"--
—�
_Fed_
7v•
Nw Rty k Ac4a+lv1 _
i-A-
-
Ealraeelq
"170!00
X11]%
101]0
111.424
001
.10,521
__107.097=213%
171,1%1
160192
-
96,11!
'
Lyi -.
1►1,6]6
767%
01.411
701.111
-
61.020
_ 135,Ue
_ _ t6M
67.1,11
69#91
8106
Caat�6a�Eapwuo
l6p60
0171
-
n"Q
21.2n
12720
J9,dM
_ {!11
2BA40
76,560
-
lir7eaiPeaolu.
11.9i0
J]%
0)U
�11 .491
-
?A1/
JZA16
__ IAy
16.05 -
6,961
-
"7.110
- 1
.
1ra1/a
oar
O ofi
Ft .6
,,>II
OA%
4.)11
0
0
—. 'dh i
0
0
1
IMn..Ore
17.717
_ Ji'A
17,6.20
7.70
-
0.lti
-d.W
r7J
- "
-
rera.o
U67b
' i.7ti
19pJ•
-
- t ier1
0 -ri
6.660
0AIS
IMA
I5.019
- 0
1633
., - 'a /ti
1,e S1 -
0
-
-
—2.041
— •.1%
2p"
0
0002
- 10%
IS.00t
ZiiH
—.._? "
69.314
-
Diu
6S)M0
--- lbti
-
0.070
- 193
—_.t1%
41.1M
boy
1
apt nrrA W.aI_..
.__N7_
-bs's
201
_
- )�6
31%
_'
7!191
- -
- - - -
u.c
a
oi%
—_
..
"
SJ-ir piv►q
_ ►TF
IOi7L
_- 1•_1.0
'Os%
-
14160
_
- -.
_IlS7?I
,•Ut
' _
1191
OVA
-
... 170
'
1sLaelu.!W.°1POg..
tl11
9611
_ -
�a)1
0W
.2.901
en.m..G1aOp#m
_
�„
- bi7t
--
21h
- a
-To-
as - -al
—Tan
.
rmr'°6 -
f•srd
i7%
91w
6776
6,77
—
—
6.700
7M9
6.206
-
_ -- _
c:or.o
:leivi
— lly
a -•u,
6 .21e
i3
b.blC
,u
o'
o1�!a y7reee.t --
1,171
1 .271.
-
•
-pmt/
Olt!
1.136
17•
791
T. 7
917
In
112
Ire�..�o9t.
1,n6
e.i%
J6
90_
eoo
=- te-
.6ao+l
e
161
•— �`•a w
- _-
i
-
?en6
_ -
- -
ear
-
wms
ux
a
°
--o
-
,
_ /i
30wy159
>4n, lem
1m
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Debra Mangen
City Clerk
Date: February 17, 1998
Subject: CONFIRMATION OF
SCHOOLBOARD
APPOINTMENTS
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
Agenda Item IV. L.
Consent
Information Only
Mgr. Recommends
To HRA
®
To Council
Action ®
Motion
Resolution
[]
Ordinance
Discussion
Recommendation:
Motion confirming the appointment of Lynne Westphal to the Edina Human Relations
Commission for a three year term ending, February 1, 2001, and the appointment of
Sarah Jones to the Edina Foundation for a term ending June 30, 2000.
Info /Background:
Yesterday, the City received two resolutions from the Edina School District making the
following appointments:
Edina Human Relations Commission - Lynne Westphal, effective immediately
to a three year term ending February 1, 2001.
Edina Foundation - Sarah Jones effective immediately to fill the unexpired term
of Juanita Peterson who resigned from the Foundation. The term ends June 30,
2000.
The Council confirms appointments made by the School Board to the Human Relations
Commission and the Edina Foundation. The School Board resolutions are attached for
your review.
-� J 7u 1-1 • CJc cL 1 nH SuraM 1 N I ENDL V l
FOR ACTION
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
Regular Meeting, February 9, 1998
Volume 69, Report 270
612 928 2514 P.02
585
SUBJECT: APPOINTMENT TO EDINA HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION
Be it Resolved, That
The Board of Education
Appoint Lynne Westphal to the Edina Human
Relations Commission for a three -year term
effective immediately through January 31, 2001.
i
!� BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Lynne Westphal has expressed a willingness to serve as one
of six School Board community appointees to the Edina Human
Relations Commission.
School Board
Community Appointees
Term Expires
Nancy Atchison
1/31/98
Sharon Ming
1/31/99
open
1/31/99
Betsy Flaten
1/31/00
Eileen Supple
1/31/00
Edina School District Policy 8140
rGL- is -177u 1`1 • C.IJ GL11VM �UrCR 11V I CfYLCIV I
FOR ACTION
612 5213 2514 P . 03
586
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
Regular Meeting, February 9, 1998
Volume 69, Report 271
SUBJECT: APPOINTMENT TO THE EDINA FOUNDATION
Be it Resolved, That
The Board of Education
Appoint Sarah Jones to The Edina Foundation
effective immediately through June 30, 2000.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Sarah Jones has expressed a willingness to serve as one of
four School Board community appointees to The Edina
Foundation. She will fill the unexpired term of Juanita
Peterson who found it necessary to resign from the
Foundation.
School Board
Community Appointees Term Expires
Jan Michaletz 6/30/98
Dennis Maetzold 6/30/99
Margo Hoppmann 6/30/00
Edina School District Policy 8140
TOTAL P.03
s �
COUNCIL
CHECK
ISTER
11 -. 1998 (18:49)
1
page
CHECK NO
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
186209
02/17/98
$25.52
3M CO
Shop supplies
TP27587
STREET NAME SI
---------------------
SIGNS & POSTS
9873
02/17/98
$404.59
3M CO
Shop supplies
TP26996
STREET NAME SI
SIC- , POSTS
9873
< *>
$430.11*
186210
02/17/98
$963.24
AAA
Registration for 22.1
020398
EQUIPMENT OPER
LIC & PERMITS
< *>
$963.24*
186211
02/17/98
$40.50
AAA
Tabs for 3 vehicles
012798
EQUIPMENT OPER
LIC & PERMITS
< *>
$40.50*
186212
02/17/98
$27.00
AAA
License tabs for 2 tr
020298
EQUIPMENT OPER
LIC & PERMITS
< *>
$27.00*
186213
02/17/98
$780.00
ABA
ABA affiliation fee
012898
EDINA ATHLETIC
DUES k SUBSCRI
< *>
$780.00*
186214
02/17/98
$951.87
ABLE HOSE & RUBBER INC
Pump hoses
9800416
GENERAL STORM
REPAIR PARTS
1596
02/17/98
$855.43
ABLE HOSE & RUBBER INC
PUMP PARTS
98 -00782
GENERAL STORM
GENERAL SUPPLI
1987
02/17/98
$15.23
ABLE HOSE k RUBBER INC
HOSE GASKETS
9800837
GENERAL ST(,RM
GENERAL SUPPLI
1987
< *>
$1,822.53*
186215
02/17/98
$828.11
ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY
Parts
042813
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
9746
02/17/98
$55.40
ABM EQUIPMENT k SUPPLY
Shackle linker
0/1 271901
EQUTPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
< *>
$883.51*
186216
02/17/98
$785.99
ACTION MAILING SERVICE
MAGAZINE /NEWSLETTER E
50035
COMMUNICATIONS
MAG /NEWSLET EX
02/17/98
$164.99
ACTION MAILING SERVICE
MAIL SERVICES
50057
GENERAL(BILLIN
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$950.98*
186217
02/17/98
$876.01
Adams
COST OF GOODS - PRO S
85231
PRO SHOP
COST OF GDS -PR
1724
< *>
$876.01*
186219
02/17/98
$80.23
AIRTOUCH CELLULAR
TELEPHONE
011098
INSPECTIONS
TELEPHONE
02/17/98
$6.30
AIRTOUCH CELLULAR
TELEPHONE
011098
PUBLIC HEALTH
TELEPHONE
02/17/98
$304.82
AIRTOUCH CELLULAR
TELEPHONE
011098
FIRE DEPT. GEN
TELEPHONE
02/17/98
$87.21
AIRTOUCH CELLULAR
TELEPHONE
011098
ADMINISTRATION
TELEPHONE
02/17/98
$17.93
AIRTOUCH CELLULAR
TELEPHONE
011098
PARK ADMIN.
TELEPHONE
02/17/98
$104.00
AIRTOUCH CELLULAR
TELEPHONE
011098
PARK MAINTENAN
TELEPHONE
02/17/98
$27.02
AIRTOUCH CELLULAR
TELEPHONE
011098
TREES & MAINTE
TELEPHONE
02/17/98
$8.40
AIRTOUCH CELLULAR
TELEPHONE
011098
CLUB HOUSE
TELEPHONE
02/17/98
$122.00
AIRTOUCH CELLULAR
TELEPHONE
011098
DISTRIBUTION
TELEPHONE
02/17/98
- $42.04
AIRTOUCH CELLULAR
TELEPHONE
011098
ENGINEERING GE
TELEPHONE
02/17/98
$90.24
AIRTOUCH CELLULAR
TELEPHONE
011098
SUPERV. & OVRH
TELEPHONE
02/17/98
$17.61
AIRTOUCH CELLULAR
Cellulars
011098
INVESTIGA'T'ION
TELEPHONE
02/17/98
$494.03
AIRTOUCH CELLULAR
Cellulars
011098
PATROL
TELEPHONE
02/17/98
$35.44
AIRTOUCH CELLULAR
Cellulars
011098
ANIMAL CONTROL
GENERAL SUPPLI
02/17/98
$27.42
AIRTOUCH CELLULAR
TELEPHONE
100-1-136
ED ADMTNiSTRAT
TELEPHONE
< *>
$1,380.61*
186220
02/17/98
$14.91
ALBINSON
PRINTING
667942
INSPECTIONS
PRINTING
8395
02/17/98
$49.84
ALBINSON
PRINTING
678070
INSPECTIONS
PRINTING
8395
< *>
$64.75*
186221
02/17/98
$365.00
Alfax Wholesale Furnitur
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
067798 -E
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP REPLACEM
1604
< *>
$365.00*
COUNCIL
CHE( -,, REGISTER
11 -rv�B -1998 (18:49)
page 2
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
186222
02/17/98
$294.00
All Saints Brands
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
2833
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
< *>
$294.00*
186223
02/17/98
$186.22
ALTERNATOR REBUILD
Shop
013098
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
< *>
$186.22*
186224
02/17/98
$49.37
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
013198
50TH ST OCCUPA
LAUNDRY
02/17/98
$183.46
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
013198
FIRE DEPT. GEN
LAUNDRY
02/17/98
$232.68
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
013198
YORK OCCUPANCY
LAUNDRY
02/17/98
$59.01
AMERICAN LINEN
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI
013198
VERNON SELLING
LAUNDRY
02/17/98
$14.38
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
013198
LABORATORY
LAUNDRY
02/17/98
$187.36
AMERICAN LINEN
LAUNDRY
013198
CITY HALL GENE
LAUNDRY
02/17/98
$87.40
AMERICAN LINEN
CLEANING SUPPLIES
013198/G
GOLF DOME
CLEANING SUPPL
02/17/98
$38.04
AMERICAN L,TNEN
LAUNDRY
nl"1198 /G
GRTLL
LATINDRY
< *>
$851.70*
186225
02/17/98
$63.20
AMERICAN SERVICES CORP
GENERAL SUPPLIES
3308
YORK SELLING
GF.NERAT, SUPPLI
2004
< *>
$63.20*
186226
02/17/98
- $75.99
Ameriserve of Minneapoli
COST OF GOODS SOLD
749146
CENTENNIAL LAK
COST OF GD SOL
02/17/98
- $89.64
Ameriserve of Minneapoli
COST OF GOODS SOLD
749311
CENTENNIAL LAK
COST OF GD SOL
02/17/98
- $30.50
Ameriserve of Minneapoli
COST OF GOODS SOLD
'750493
CENTENNIAL LAK
COST OF GD SOL
02/17/98
$348.32
Ameriserve of Minneapoli
COST OF GOODS SOLD
261346
CENTENNIAL LAK
COST OF GD SOL
02/17/98
$25.33
Ameriserve of Minneapoli
COST OF GOODS SOLD
261347
CENTENNIAL LAK
COST OF GD SOL
< *>
$177.52*
186227
02/17/98
$21.41
AMUNDSON, ERIK
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
020298
POLICE DEPT. G
CONF & SCHOOLS
< *>
$21.41*
186228
02/17/98
$573.19
ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS INC
Mobil radio
17432
EQUIPMENT OPER
RADIO SERVICE
1367
02/17/98
$573.19
ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS INC
Mobil radio
17433
EQUTPMENT OPER
RADIO SERVTCE
1370
< *>
$1,146.38*
186229
02/17/98
$65.00
Anoka County Law Enforce
CONT ED
020698
POLICE DEPT. G
CONF & SCHOOLS
< *>
$65.00*
186230
02/17/98
$228.25
APACHE HOSE & BELTING IN
GENERAL SUPPLIES
699031
BUTLDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
1496
< *>
$228.25*
186231
02/17/98
$30.00
Applied Concepts Inc
GENERAL SUPPLIES
25779
POI,TCE DEPT. G
GENERAL SUPPLI
1802
< *>
$30.00*
186232
02/17/98
$398.36
ASAP MAILING SERVICES
POSTAGE
70801
CENT SVC GENER
POSTAGE
< *>
$398.36*
186233
02/17/98
$151.20
ASCAP
LICENSE FEE
020698
ED ADMTNTSTRAT
DUES & SUBSCRT
< *>
$151.20*
186234
02/17/98
$937.02
ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO.
Parts
255871
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1184
02/17/98
$162.31
ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO.
Shop parts
266691
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1627
02/17/98
$106.39
ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO.
PLOW BAR
267821
CENTENNIAL LAK
TOOLS
2150
< *>
$1,205.72*
186236
02/17/98
$259.21
Aspen Waste
RUBBISH REMOVAL
020198
GENERAL MAINT
RUBBISH REMOVA
02/17/98
$74.08
Aspen Waste
RUBBISH REMOVAL
020198
FIRE DEPT. GEN
RUBBTSH REMOVA
COUNCIL
CHEC_ 2GISTER
11 -8-1998 (18:49)
page 3
CHECK NO
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
186236
02/17/98
$19.95
Aspen Waste
RUBBISH REMOVAL
020198
FIRE SUPPLIES
RUBBISH REMOVA
02/17/98
02/17/98
$159.87
Aspen Waste
RUBBISH REMOVAL
020198
CITY HALL GENE
RUBBISH REMOVA
$259.20
Aspen Waste
RUBBISH REMOVAL
020198
PW BUILDING
RUBBISH REMOVA
02/17/98
$40.46
Aspen Waste
RUBBISH REMOVAL
020198
ART CENTER BLD
RUBBISH REMOVA
02/17/98
$157.55
Aspen Waste
RUBBISH REMOVAL
020198
CLUB HOUSE
RUBBISH REMOVA
02/17/98
$40.44
Aspen Waste
RUBBISH REMOVAL
020198
GOLF DOME
RUBBISH REMOVA
02/17/98
$487.44
Aspen Waste
RUBBISH REMOVAL
020198
ARENA BLDG /nRO
RIIBBISII REMOVA
02/17/98
02/17/98
$718.58
Aspen Waste
RUBBISH REMOVAL
020198
ED HUILDINC F
RIIRIIISII REMOVA
02/17/98
$3'7.31
$77.20
Aspen Waste
Aspen
RUBBISH REMOVAL
020198
50TH ST OCCUPA
RUBBISH REMOVA
02/17/98
$82.20
Waste
Aspen Waste
RUBBISH REMOVAL
RUBBISH
020198
YORK OCCUPANCY
RUBBISH REMOVA
REMOVAL
020198
VERNON OCCUPAN
RUBBISH REMOVA
< *>
$2,413.49*
186237
02/17/98
$113.19
ASPLUND COFFEE
COST OF GOODS SOLD
01229980
CENTENNIAL LAK
COST OF GD SOL
< *>
$113.19*
186238
02/17/98
$4.60
ASTLEFORD EQUIPMENT COMP
Shop parts
T64884
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1424
< *>
$4.60*
186239
02/17/98
$2.77
AT &T
TELEPHONE
011898
CENT SVC GENER
TELEPHONE
02/17/98
$5.33
AT &T
TELEPHONE
011898
CENT SVC GENER
TELEPHONE
02/17/98
$6.12
AT &T
TELEPHONE
012498
CENT SVC GENER
TELEPHONE
< *>
$14.22*
186240
02/17/98
$1,858.29
AUTO MACHINE AND SUPPLY
REPAIR PARTS
013198
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
02/17/98
$54.54
AUTO MACHINE AND SUPPLY
REPAIR PARTS
013198
ED BUILDING &
REPAIR PARTS
02/17/98
$404.60
AUTO MACHINE AND SUPPLY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
013198/G
MAINT OF COURS
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$2,317.43*
186241
02/17/98
$145.00
AUTOMATIC GARAGE DOOR
REPAIR DOOR
0088093-
ARENA BLDG /GRO
CONTR REPAIRS
1866
< *>
$145.00*
186242
02/17/98
$35.10
BACHMANS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
103024
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPLI
5611
02/17/98
$21.38
BACHMANS
PLANTINGS & TREES
09111
TREES & MAINTE
PLANT & TREES
9028
02/17/98
02/17/98
$151.81
BACHMANS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
24645
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPLI
2011
02/17/98
$42.78
$94.32
BACHMANS
BACHMANS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
00109912
GENERAL STORM
GENERAL SUPPLI
8486
02/17/98
$130.47
BACHMANS
Past due
PLANTINGS & TREES
SUMMER
TREES & MAINTE
PLANT & TREES
02/17/98
$184.58
BACHMANS
PLANTINGS & TREES
24195
332031
TREES & MAINTE
TREES & MAINTE
PLANT & TREES
PLANT & TREES
8466
8907
< *>
$660.44*
186243
02/17/98
$260.00
Bakken, Ruth
Tap instructor
012998
SENIOR CITIZEN
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$260.00*
11162.14
021171911
$2,498.22
11ARR EN(IMP ?RINl;
,•n,i r:,•T'v
A :'7'rt',r,
r:I:NI:ItAI, ,':'I'rH:M
I'Rr l tl:RVlr'I•:::
]86.2.45
02/17/98
02117198
$97.09
Battery Wholesale Inc
Batteries
2276
EQUIPMENT OpI ?R
REPAIR PARTS
1589
$116.16
I1.1tt,•1-y Wholf'r+.rl,• I0,•
11.0 1,•r ir;:
l
RQ111PMENT ()PI- :R
I?FPAIII PART!,
1')',1
186246
02/17/98
02/17/98
$826.33
Becker Arena Products
GENERAL SUPPLIES
8050
ARENA BLDG /GRO
GENERAL SUPPLI
1735
$461.16
Becker Arena Products
REPAIR RESURFACER
8247
ARENA ICE MAIN
CONTR REPAIRS
2010
< *>
$1,287.49*
COUNCIL r'HEt- REGISTER 11-rLB -1.998 (18:49) page 4
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
186247
02/17/98
$145.70
BELLBOY CORPORATION
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
13504100
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
02/17/98
1!19.50
BELLBOY CORPORATION
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
27038300
50TH ST SELT!':
7- F GDS MIX
02/17/98
,.1.40
BELLBOY CORPORATION
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
2702700
YORK SELLIN:;
..,. F GDS MIX
02/17/98
$42.00
BELLBOY CORPORATION
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
1354000
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
02/17/98
$60.85
BELLBOY CORPORATION
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI
13540100
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD LIQU
02/17/98
$156.00
BELLBOY CORPORATION
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
27057600
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
02/17/98
$68.85
BELLBOY CORPORATION
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
27074700
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
02/17/98
$34.75
BELLBOY CORPORATION
COST OF GOODS SOLD MT
27074ROO
YORK SRLT.INr,
CST OF (IDS, MTX
< *>
$545.05*
186248
02/17/98
$39.38
Bellingham, Michelle
Skating instructor Ed
012898
ART CENTER ADM
PROF SERVTCES
< *>
$39.38*
186250
02/17/98
$167.01
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
5255190
PARK ADMIN.
CON! � SCHOOLS
1603
02/17/98
$17.20
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
Office supplies
5269070
PW BUILDING
GENEERAk SIIPPLI
1599
02/17/98
$22.09
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
5273690
POLICE DEPT. G
OFFICE SUPPLIE
02/17/98
$199.88
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
5273700
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL SUPPLI
2000
02/17/98
$184.72
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
R172781
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP REPLACEM
1439
02/17/98
- $18.06
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CM525230
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL SUPPLI
02/17/98
$47.89
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
Binders, binders inde
5284370
PARK ADMIN.
OFFICE SUPPLIE
02/17/98
$56.39
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
Office supplies
5287830
STREET NAME SI
REPAIR PARTS
1772
02/17/98
$285.42
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
5279060
CITY HALL
EQUIP REPLACEM
02/17/98
$350.00
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
5294910
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP REPLACEM
1803
02/17/98
$221.14
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
5294910
POLICE DEPT. G
OFFICE SUPPLIE
1803
02/17/98
$79.77
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
5295220
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP REPLACEM
1803
02/17/98
$43.79
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
Office supplies
5301410
PW BUILDING
GENERAL SUPPLI
1795
02/17/98
- $134.72
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
60 days past due
013098
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL SUPPLI
02/17/98
- $54.52
BERTELSON BROS. INC.
90 days past due
013098
CENT SVC GENER
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$1,468.00*
186251
02/17/98
$745.07
Best Access Systems of
M Lock core & keys
58578
BUILDINGS
REPAIR PARTS
1351
02/17/98
$947.42
Best Access Systems of
M Lock core
58715
BUILDINGS
REPAIR PARTS
1361
02/17/98
$262.82
Best Access Systems of
M Lock core
58871
BUILDINGS
REPAIR PARTS
1794
02/17/98
$282.65
Best Access Systems of
M Lock::
or, 9430
CITY HALL GENE
REPAIR PARTS.
1,76')
< *,
$2,237.96*
186252
02/17/98
$65.26
BIFFS INC
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
BI111583
BUILDING MAINT
PROF SERVICES
2025
02/17/98
$85.26
BIFFS INC
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
B1115833
BUILDING MAINT
PROF SERVICES
2025
< *>
$150.52*
186253
02/17/98
$100.00
BLOOD, DAVID
POLTCE SERVICES
021798
RESERVE PROGRA
CONTR SERVTCES
< *>
$100.00*
186254
02/17/98
$1,363.77
BONESTROO ROSENE ANDERLI
ARCHITECT /ENG FEES
OS21S6
PKROND CIP
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$1, 363. -77*
186255
02/17/98
$94.61
BOYER TRUCKS
Shop parts
672781
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1642
02 /17 /qR
$125.33
T1OYER TRUCK!!
"hop party
I I1: 5
EQUIPMENT OPER
RE.PA'IR PORT::
1409
< *>
$219.94*
18625G
n2/17/98
$61.77
BRENT'S: SI(INS: f)TtiT'T,AY &
STAN
nnnn0414
(1,01,1-' DOME
(,RNERAL SUPPLT
2054
< *>
$61.77*
186257
02/17/98
$349.40
BRISSMAN- KENNEDY INC
CLEANING SUPPLIES
500629
CITY HALL GENE
CLEANING SUPPL
1808
02/17/98
$19.66
BRISSMAN- KENNEDY INC
CLEANING SUPPLTES
50M;291
CITY HALL GENE
CLEANING SUPPL
1808
COUNCIL
C11EC 3GISTER
1 � 13-1998 (18:49)
page 5
CHECK NO DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
------ - - - - --
-- - - - VENDOR --
DESCRIPTION
- -
INVOICE-
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
<*>
$369.06*
- -
-
---------------
------ - - - - -- - -
--
186258
*>
02/17/98
$201.29
BRO -TEX INC
Supplies
190127
PW BUILDING
CLEANING SUPPL
1375
<
$201.29*
186259
*>
02/17/98
$6,703.46
Browning Ferris Industri
Refuse
013198
50TH STREET RU
PROF SERVICES
<
$6,703.46*
186260
02/17/98
$985.00
BRW INC.
13RAEMAR OFFICE STUDY
267 -0306
CONTINGENCIES
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$985.00*
186261
02/17/98
02/17/98
$132.65
BUDGET PROJECTOR REPAIR
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
6449
MEDIA LAB
CONTR REPAIRS
9924
*>
$77.00
BUDGET PROJECTOR REPAIR
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
6859
MEDIA LAB
CONTR REPAIRS
9912
<
$209.65*
186262
< *>
02/17/98
$100.00
$100.00*
BUTLER, GEORGE
POLICE SERVICES
021998
RESERVE PROGRA
CONTR SERVICES
186263
*>
02/17/98
$137.00
C.L. Bensen Co Inc
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1379
ARENA BLDG /GRO
GENERAL SUPPLI
1996
<
$137.00*
186264
*>
02/17/98
$50.00
CANTON, JANET
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
020998
FINANCE
MILEAGE
<
$50.00*
186265
*>
02/17/98
$157.79
CATCO
Repairs
360659
CENTENNIAL LAK
CONTR REPAIRS
<
$157.79*
186266
*>
02/17/98
$120.00
CERES ENVIRONMENTAL SERV
Weed disposal
212.40
TREES & MAINTE
RUBBISH REMOVA
<
$120.00*
186267
02/17/98
$121.00
CHAOUCH, HABIB
SOCCER REF
012398
GOLF DOME
PROF SERVTCES
<*
$121.00*
186268
< *>
02/17/98
$50.00
$50.00*
CITY BEAT
ADVERTISTNG OTHER
1463
GOLF DOME
ADVERT OTHER
2052
186269
02/1 "7/98
02/17/98
$321.19
$43.31
CITY OF EDINA
CITY OF
SEWER & WATER
021 '198
CITY HALL GENE
SEWER & WATER
02/17/98
$48.07
EDINA
CITY OF EDINA
SEWER & WATER
021.798
BUILDING MAINT
SEWER & WATER
02/17/98
$50.34
CITY OF EDINA
SEWER & WATER
SEWER & WATER
021798
GENERAL MAINT
SEWER & WATER
02/17/98
$42.67
CITY OF EDINA
SEWER & WATER
021798
021798
50TH ST OCCUPA
PW BUILDING
SEWER & WATER
02/17/98
02/17/98
$49.06
$510.65
CITY OF EDINA
SEWER & WATER
021798
VERNON OCCUPAN
SEWER & WATER
SEWER & WATER
< *>
$1,065.29*
CITY OF EDINA
SEWER & WATER
021798
PW BUILDING
SEWER & WATER
1.86270
*>
02/17/nil
$790.00
CTTY OF ST. PAIIL
CONT ED POIJUR
1101.10E DEPT. ('
roNI' & S('IIOOLS
<
$790.00*
186271
02/17/98
02/17/98
$25.56
$15.71
City Wide Window Service
City Wide Window
Window cleaning
110970
YORK OCCUPANCY
CONTR REPAIRS
02/17/98
$15.71
Service
City Wide Window Service
Window cleaning
Window cleaning
110971
110972
VERNON OCCUPAN
CONTR REPAIRS
< *>
$56.98*
50TI1 ST OCCUPA
CONTR REPAIRS
186272
*>
02/17/98
$98.45
CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP
Pike poles & Axes
40661
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
1464
<
$98.45*
COUNCIL
CHEC.,. REGISTER
ll -rEB -1998 (18:49)
page 6
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
186273
02/17/98
$485.40
CLUTCH & U -JOTNT
REPAIR PARTS
147959
CENTENNIAT. LAK
REPAIR PARTS
8865
< *>
$485.40*
186274
02/17/98
$468.36
COLE PUBLICATIONS
BOOKS & PAMPHLETS
245707
POLICE DEPT. G
BOOKS & PAMPHL
1703
< *>
$468.36*
186275
02/17/98
$230.55
Construction Market Data
Ad for bid
CB6854
ADMINISTRATION
ADVERTISING LE
< *>
$230.55*
186276
02/17/98
$567.06
COOL AIR MECHANICAL
Repair.compressor
24192
ARENA ICE MAIN
CONTR REPAIRS
1998
< *>
$567.06*
186277
02/17/98
$57.11
COPY EQUIPMENT INC.
Blueline paper
0080090
ENGINEERING GE
BLUE PRINTING
1741
02/17/98
$67.31
COPY EQUIPMENT INC.
Metric scale
0080173
ENGINEERING GE
GENERAL SUPPLI
1748
02/17/98
$21.29
COPY EQUIPMENT INC.
Blueline paper
0080988
ENGINEERING GE
BLUE PRINTING
1925
< *>
$145.71*
186278
02/17/98
$182.49
CREATIVE IMAGES ON RIBBO
PRINTING
4115
ARENA ADMINIST
PRINTING
1727
< *>
$182.49*
386279
02/17/98
$1,386.67
CRIMMINS MD, TIMOTHY J
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
020998
FIRE DEPT. GEN
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$1,386.67*
186280
02/17/98
$316.82
CRYSTEEL DIST INC
Hanger rod shop
137078
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1630
< *>
$316.82*
186281
02/17/98
$32.00
Culligan
SOFT WATER SERVICE
8903585
LABORATORY
CONTR SERVICES
< *>
$32.00*
186282
02/17/98
$302.61
Curtis 1000
Amb ret env
1.6905301
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
1533
< *>
$302.61*
186283
02/17/98
$2,348.64
Custom Energy LLC
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
J000941
ICE. ARENA PROG
CIP
1815
< *>
$2,348.64*
186284
02/17/98
$92.50
D.C. ANNIS SEWER INC
Drain cleaning
1760
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONTR REPAIRS
02/17/98
$79.50
D.C. ANNIS SEWER INC
Contracted sewer work
1763
BUILDING MAINT
CONTR REPAIRS
1894
< *>
$172.00*
186285
02/17/98
$752.00
D2 Services
Repair flow meter
5A78
PUMP & I,TFT ST
CONTR REPAIRS
1791
< *>
$752.00*
186286
02/17/98
$84.28
DANKO EMERGENCY EQIIIPMEN
Boots
271834
FIRE DEPT. GEN
PROTECT CLOTHI
1469
02/17/98
$45.10
DANKO EMERGENCY EQIIIPMEN
BAr
272179
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
1469
02/17/1)A
$193.11
DANKO EMERGENCY EQIIIPMEN
I1RI,MET
272402
1,1121? nrCT. GEN
PROTECT ('LOTHI
1473
< *>
$322.49*
1.86287
02/17/98
$1,444.40
DAY DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
25526
5.OT11 ST SELLTN
CST OF' GDS BEE
02/17/98
$3,050.75
DAY DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
25592
YORK SELI.,ING
CST OF GDS BEE
02/1.7/98
$60.60
DAY DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS SURD MI
25695
YORK SELLING
CSI' OF G198 MIX
02/17/98
$20.20
DAY DISTRIBUTIN(,
COST OF GOODS S0I,1) BE
25(•96
VERNON SELLING
CST OF' GDS BEE
02/17/98
$1,243.07
DAY DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS 1401,1.) BE
25697
VERNON SELLING
CSI' OF GDS BEE
02/17/98
$775.60
DAY DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
25984
50T11 ST SELLTN
CST OF' GDS BEE
02/17/98
$40.40
DAY DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
25986
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MIX
02/17/98
$159.20
DAY DISTRIBUTING
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
26019
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
COUNCIL
CHEC :GISTER
16,279
1;
3 -1998
(18:49)
REPLACEM 1319
Dikareva, Natalya
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
0 20898
7
CENTER
ADM PROF
SERVICES
GOODS
SOLD
WI
65786
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
page
CHECK NO
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
LI
DESCRIPTION
COST
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
186287
02/17/98
$938.50
DAY DISTRIBUTING
COST
OF GOODS
SOLD
BE
26051
YORK SELLING
CST OF
GDS
BEE
COST
02/17/98
$57.40
DAY DISTRIBUTING
COST
OF GOODS
SOLD
MI
26052
YORK SELLING
CST OF
GDS
MIX
OF
02/17/98
$313.00
DAY DISTRIBUTING
COST
OF GOODS
SOLD
BE
26057
VERNON SELLING
CST OF
GDS
BEE
GOODS
02/17/98
$60.60
DAY DISTRIBUTING
COST
OF GOODS
SOLD
BE
26058
VERNON SELLING
CST OF
GDS
BEE
< *>
WI
$8,163.72*
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
80816
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
186288
02/17/98
$116.85
DAY - TIMERS INC.
Daytimer
SOLD
LI
80875
27929041
ED ADMINISTRAT
GENERAL
SUPPLI
< *>
70592
$116.85*
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
70593
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
W1
186289
02/17/98
$157.67
DELEGARD TOOL CO.
Tools
12584
EQUIPMENT OPER
TOOLS
1365
< *>
$157.67*
186290 02/17/98
186291 02/17/98
186292 02/17/98
186293 02/17/98
186294 02/17/98
186295 02/17/98
186296 02/17/98
02/17/98
186299
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/1.7/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
$23.93 DENNYS 5th AV BAKERY COST OF GOODS SOLD 80577 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 1382
$23.93*
$146.94 Department of Administat MNET W9712165 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE
$146.94*
$1,050.78
$1,050.78*
$169.00
$169.00*
$722.43
$722.43*
$504.85
$504.85*
$181.35
$98.53
$279.88*
$218.35
$42.95
$193.38
$268.90
- $258.63
- $73.44
$232.97
$473.54
$370.52
$632.11
$56.79
$703.17
$459.71
- $157.80
-$7.50
- $26.80
- $16.75
- $13.14
$334.80
$618.63
$112.37
Design Wise Commercial
F EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
16,279
CITY
HALT,
EQUIP
REPLACEM 1319
Dikareva, Natalya
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
0 20898
ART
CENTER
ADM PROF
SERVICES
DONALD SALVERDA k ASSOCI CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS P8797 -12 ADMTNTSTRATTON CONF k SCHOOI.,S
E -Z Sharp Inc General supplies 1981. ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPLI 1997
E -Z -GO TEXTRON
E -Z -GO TEXTRON
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
EAGLE WINE
REPAIR PARTS 0544839 GOLF CARS REPAIR PARTS 1569
REPAIR PARTS 0544840 GOLF CARS REPAIR PARTS 1575
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
65 "781
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
65782
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
65786
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
65796
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
80445
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
80446
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
68512
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
68513
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
68521
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
68522
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
BE
68523
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
68535
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
68536
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
80749
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
80815
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
80816
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
80817
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
80875
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
70592
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
70593
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
W1
70Gn0
50T11 ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
50TIl ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD -WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
SOT11 ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
SOTH ST SE1.,1.,TN CST OF GD WINE
CO UNCI1 -.
CHE(.r, REGISTER
11 -eEB -1998
( 18:49)
page 8
CHECK NO.,
---------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
------------
VENDOR
----------- - - - - --
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
.-PO NUM
186299
02/17/98
$168.90
EAGLE WINE
- - --
COST
- --------------------
OF GOODS
SOLD
WI
-----
70601
----------- - - - -
VERNON SELLING
-. --.. -----------------
WINE
02/17/98
$750.24
EAGLE WINE
COST
OF GOODS
SOLD
WI
70602
VERNON SELLING
:u WINE
02/17/98
$394.25
EAGLE WINE
COST
OF GOODS
SOLD
WI
70608 .
YORK SELLING
CSC uF' GD WINE
02/17/98
$2,154.44
EAGLE WINE
COST
OF GOODS
SOLD
WI
70609
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
02/17/98
$638.30
EAGLE WINE
COST
OF GOODS
SOLD
WI
70617
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
< *>
$8,270.26*
186300
02/17/98
$112.00
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST
OF GOODS
SOLD
BE
018770
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
02/17/98
$2,585.35
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST
OF GOODS
SOLD
BE
256061
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
02/17/98
$201.50
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST
OF GOODS
SOLD
BE
257247
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
02/17/98
$1,702.50
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST
OF GOODS
SOLD
BE
257250
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
02/17/98
$4,540.00
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST
OF GOODS
SOLD
BE
257261
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
02/17/98
$821.35
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST
OF GOODS
SOLD
BE
259095
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
02/17/98
$3,052.55
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST
OF GOODS
SOLD
BE
259107
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
02/17/98
$2,259.70
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST
OF GOODS
SOLD
BE
259108
VERNON SELLING
CST.OF GDS BEE
02/17/98
$72.00
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST
OF GOODS
SOLD
BE
260245
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
02/17/98
$1,852.05
EAST'SIDE BEVERAGE
COST
OF GOODS
SOLD
BE
262045
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
02/17/98
$1,805.75
EAST SIDE BEVERAGE
COST
OF GOODS
SOLD
BE
262046
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
< *>
$19,004.75*
186301
02/17/98
$116.94
ECOLAB PEST ELIMINATION
Pest
control
5173240
CENTENNIAL LAK
SVC CONTR EQUI
02/17/98
$99.15
ECOLAB PEST ELIMINATION
PEST
CONTROL
5173246
POOL TRACK GRE
SVC CONTR EQUI
< *>
$216'.09*
186302
02/17/98
$9.45
Edina Cleaners
Linen
cleaning
97159
POOL TRACK GRE
LAUNDRY
02/17/98
$0.61
Edina Cleaners
Linen
cleaning
tax
98004
POOL TRACK GRE
LAUNDRY
< *>
$10.06*
186303
02/17/98
$25.63
EDINA HARDWARE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
rF9084
AR•I' SUPPLY (IIF
GENERAL SUPPLT
9916
< *>
$7.5.63*
186304
02/17/98
$16.26
Edina Public Schools
Labels
020498
ATHLE'T'IC ACTTV
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$16.26*
18630 F;
02117/)R
$24.36
EDMUND!., I,T7
C'c)S'P
O F
MI
o I'),(8
!.O'I'll I' t,l l,I,1N
G;'1' OI' GD:; MIX
< *>
$24.36*
186306
02/17/98
$126.74
Enhance Graphics Inc
Sign
Shop Supplie.^
63063
SNOW k TCr REM
GENERAL SUPPLT
1.773
< *>
$126.74*
186307
02/17/98
$120.00
FBI /LEEDS
CONFERENCES &
SCHOOLS
n20298
POLICE DEPT. G
CONE & SCHOOLS
< *>
$120.00*
186308
02/17/98
$1,826.22
Fechheimer
UNIFORMS
29864
ATHLETIC ACTIV
GENERAL SUPPLI
+
< *>
$1,826.22*
186309
02/17/98
$177.86
Fire Instructors Aesocia
Training
manual.,;
43RRn
FIRE DEPT. GEN
TRAINING AIDS
5553
< *>
$177.86*
186310
02/17/98
$24.95
Fire Rescue Magazine
Fire
rescue magazine
012798
FIRE DEPT. GEN
DUES & SUBSCRI
<*>
$24.95*
186311
02/17/98
$2,502.97
FISCHER AGGREGATES INC
Metro
seal
6081
SNOW & ICE REM
SAND,GRVL & RO
5437
02/17/98
$1,402.49
FISCHER AGGREGATES INC
Metro.seal
6094
SNOW & ICE REM
SAND,GRVL & RO
5438
02/17/98
$671.63
FISCHER AGGREGATES INC
Metro
seal
6113
SNOW & ICE REM
SAND,GRVL & RO
5438
C:OUNCIL
CIIEC BGISTER
1. B -1998 ( 18 :49)
page 9
CHECK NO
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
186311
02/17/98
$1,251.33
FISC14ER AGGREGATES INC
Metro seal
6105
SNOW & ICE REM
SAND,GRVL k RO
5438 ----
< *>
$5,828.42*
186312
02/17/98
$419.75
FISHER SCIENTIFIC
Lab supplies
0517932
LABORATORY
GENERAL SUPPLI
1594
< *>
$419.75*
186313
02/17/98
$89.70
FLAHERTY'S HAPPY TYME CO
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MI
7858
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MIX
02/17/98
$63.60
FLAHERTY'S HAPPY TYME CO
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MI
4568
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MIX
02/17/98
$33.60
FLAHERTY'S HAPPY TYME CO
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MI
7965
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GUS MIX
02/17/98
$268.80
FLAHERTY'S HAPPY TYME CO
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MI
010998.
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
02/17/98
-$5.60
FLAHERTY'S HAPPY TYME CO
COST OF GOODS SOLD
MI
4606
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MIX
< *>
$450.10*
186314
02/17/98
$41.23
Flasher Handling Corp
Sign shop
0066583
STREET NAME SI
GF.NERAT, SUPPLI
9097
< *>
$41.23*
186315
*>
02/17/98
$260.66
FORMS GROUP, THE
PRINTING
2159
POLICE DEPT. G
PRINTING
7594
<
$260.66*
186316
*>
02/17/98
$20.43
FOWLER ELECTRIC
REPAIR PARTS
52017700
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS
1856
<
$20.43*
186317
02/17/98
$29.82
FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY
OFFICE SUPPLIES
70191507
PARK ADMIN.
OFFICE SUPPLIE
< *>
$29.82*
186318
02/17/98
$165.56
FRESCO
Elec supplies
42804
ST LIGHTING OR
GENERAL SUPPLI
9740
02/17/98
$165.31
FRESCO
Safety hammer
42812
LIFT STATION M
WATER TRTMT SU
9747
< *>
$330.87*
186319
02/17/98
$102.59
G & K DIRECT PURCHASE
Uniforms
041573
EQUIPMENT OPER
LAUNDRY
1973
02/17/98
$748.92
G & K DIRECT PURCHASE
Uniforms
041593
GENERAL MAINT
LAUNDRY
1974
02/17/98
$46.99
G & K DIRECT PURCHASE
Uniforms
041923
PUMP & LIFT ST
LAUNDRY
1972
02/17/98
$74.31
G & K DIRECT PURCHASE
Uniforms
042013
EQUIPMENT OPER
LAUNDRY
1971
< *>
$972.81*
186320
*=
02/17/98
$"1.49
GENERAL SPOR'T'S
Score book^
1 "7tifa
EDINA A'I'111,E'PiC
GFNF..RAT, SUPP1,1
<
$7.49*
186321
02/17/98
$168.75
George, Heather
Skating instructor
Ed
012898
ED ADMINISTRAT
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$168.75*
186322
*>
02/17/98
$957.23
GEREBI, LIZ
Skating instructor
Ed
01.2898
ED ADMINISTRAT
PROF SERVICES
<
$957.23*
1.86323
*>
02/17/98
$795.00
GOLF MTNNRSOTA
ADVERTTSTNG OTIIP;R
Of+n50
r,OLP DOME
ADVERT OTHER
2051
<
$'795.00*
186324
*>
02/17/98
$193.00
GOVERNMENT TRAINING SERV
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
020698
ADMINISTRATION
CONE & SCHOOLS
<
$193.00*
186325
*>
02/17/98
$207.35
GRAFIX SHOPPE
Emblems
25193
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIFS
1422
<
$207.35*
186326
02/17/98
02/17/98
$424.94
GRAINGER
POWER WASHER
498 -7724
GOLF DOME
RANGE BALLS
1317
$13.53
GRAINGER
ELEC PARTS
498 -7727
GOLF DOME
REPAIR PARTS
1201
COUNCIL
CHEF- REGISTER
GOODS
SOLD
11 -rEB -1998 (18:49)
65784
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
page 10
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
GOODS
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
186326
02/17/98
$39.03
GRAINGER
OF
Batteries & Testers
49580643
POOL TRACK GRE
GENERAL SUPPLI
1272
CST
02/17/98
$357.23
GRAINGER
COST
Tools
49519988
DISTRIBUTION
EQUIP MAINT
1598
50TH ST SELLIN
02/17/98
$63.90
GRAINGER
LIQU
Repair parts
49520725
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS
1572
68515
02/17/98
$51.95
GRAINGER
GD
Shop parts
49521469
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
1789
< *>
68516
$950.58*
CST
OF
GD
LIQU
COST
OF
GOODS
186327
02/17/98
$217.00
Grand Pere Wines
Inc
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
5132
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
OF
< *>
SOLD
$217.00*
68525
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD
LIQU
COST
186328
02/17/98
$774.00
GRAPE BEGINNINGS
INC
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
17692
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
LIQU
COST
02/17/98
$399.00
GRAPE BEGINNINGS
INC
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
17715
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
GDS
MIX
02/17/98
$1,092.00
GRAPE BEGINNINGS
INC
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
17745
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
OF
< *>
LIQU
$2,265.00*
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
68529
YORK SELLING
CST
186329
02/17/98
$51.25
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC
CO.
Light bulbs
10497025
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPLI
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
02/17/98
$303.13
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC
CO.
Shop supplies
10497682
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
1494
YORK SELLING
02/17/98
$696.64
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC
CO.
Elec parts
10498370
ST LIGHTING OR
GENERAL SUPPLI
1201
< *>
50T11 ST SELLIN
$1,051.02*
OF
GD
LIQU
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
186330
02/17/98
$639.73
GREAT WESTERN SUPPLY CO
GENERAL SUPPLIES
00833647
POLICE DEPT. G
GENERAL SUPPLI
1328
< *>
SOLD
$639.73*
70598
50TIl ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
LIQU
COST
186331
186333
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
< *>
186334 02/17/98
02-/17/98
$92.00 GREEN, DICK
$92.00*
$1,766.54
$55.72
$23.51
$1,301.66
$458.40
$31.06
$1,730.52
$52.02
$549.90
$371.25
$41.24
$4,376.71
$102.15
$102.15
$17.34
$628.83
$41.57
$2,099.82
$610.48
$13.07
$38.28
$91.18
$3,906.18
$18,409.58*
$472.86
$73.49
$546.35*
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
H &L MESABI
H &L MESABI
186335 02/17/98 $132.57 HAAGEN DAZS CO, THE
ART CENTER INSTRUCTOR 020898 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
65784
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
LIQU
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
68507
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
LIQU
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
68508
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
LIQU
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
68509
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
LIQU
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
68515
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD
LIQU
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
68516
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD
LIQU
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
68517
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD
LIQU
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
68525
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD
LIQU
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
68526
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD
LIQU
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
MI
68527
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GDS
MIX
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
68528
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD
LIQU
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
68529
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD
LIQU
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
69265
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
LIQU
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
69266
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD
LIQU
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
70595
50T11 ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
LIQU
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
70596
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
LIQU
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
70598
50TIl ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
LIQU
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
70599
50Th ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
LIQU
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
70604
VERNON SEI-I,ING
CST
OF
GD
LIQU
COST
OF
GOODS
SO1,1)
LL
70(.06
VE RNON :,RL,I,ING
CST
OF
GD
LIQU
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
70611
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WINE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
70615
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD
LIQU
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
70616
YORK SEI_,LING
CST
OF
GD
LIQU
Part
036075
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
9723
Plow
blade
06383
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
9735
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
71.7364
GRILL
COST
OF GD
SOL 3953
COUNCIL
CHEC. ,GISTER
11 3-1998 (18:49)
page 11
CHECK NO
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
<*>
$132.57*
186336
02/17/98
$30.00
HALL, MARILYN
Perform Edinborough
021298
ED ADMINISTRAT
PRO SVC OTHER
< *>
$30.00*
186337
02/17/98
$1,011.75
HALLMAN OIL COMPANY
Hallman oil
303543
EQUIPMENT OPER
LUBRICANTS
5498
< *>
$1,011.75*
186338
02/17/98
$3,203.73
Harris Companies
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
68858
ARENA BLDG /GRO
CONTR REPAIRS
1744
< *>
$3,203.73*
186339
02/17/98
$17,028.00
HARRIS HOMEYER CO.
INSURANCE
3963
CENT SVC GENER
INSURANCE
02/17/98
$16,107.00
HARRIS HOMEYER CO.
INSURANCE
3965
CENT SVC GENER
INSURANCE
02/17/98
$1,033.00
HARRIS HOMEYER CO.
INSURANCE
4565
CENT SVC GENER
INSURANCE
< *>
$34,168.00*
186340
02/17/98
$47,685.65
HEALTH PARTNERS
HOSPITALIZATION
7615102
CENT SVC GENER
HOSPITALIZATIO
< *>
$47,685.65*
186341
02/17/98
$2,240.17
HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL
Amb supplies
6330
FIRE DEPT. GEN
FIRST AID SUPP
4092
< *>
$2,240.17*
186342
02/17/98
$664.37
HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
110497
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP MAINT
02/17/98
$1,340.73
HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF
Booking fee
012698
LEGAL SERVICES
COURT CHARGES
< *>
$2,005.10*
1- 86343
02/17/98
$38.80
HENNEPIN COUNTY SURVEYOR
GENERAL SUPPLIES
020298
ENGINEERING GE
GENERAL SIIPPLI
< *>
$38.80*
186344
02/17/98
$100.51
HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURE
Contracted repairs
35074
TRAFFIC SIGNAL
CONTR REPAIRS
< *>
$100.51*
186345
02/17/98
$100.00
HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURE
Utility permits
26100
DISTRIBUTION
LIC & PERMITS
< *>
$100.00*
186346
02/17/98
$240.00
HIRSH, JIM
SOCCER REF
012398
GOLF DOME
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$240.00*
186347
02/17/98
$262.50
Hoel, Judy
Skating instructor Ed
012898
ED ADMINISTRAT
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$262.50*
186348
02/17/98
$100.00
HOFFMAN, WILLIAM
POLICE SERVICES
021798
RESERVE PROGRA
CONTR SERVICES
< *>
$100.00*
1863411
02/17/08
$43.35
Il(,mf, Jiii(—
cor!'1' o (,.noj)S7 �:C)LI) M1
1,1':!t
V171MO N f:17f I,1Nf;
(' :'1' of ( :I): MIS(
.. -.
::;.l { { 1 ) 1
IA6350
02/17/118
$ 8.58
1101`f<INf: (:ARMIiN'I' IJ7'I" ERIN
( :,IIm.u111c
41:'!t
( :I ?NI•:I?AI, MAINT
I,AIINI)I?Y
14!t-
• 1.1t . "it *
186351
02/1'1/98
$6,490.00
HOPKINS PET HOSPITAL
KENNEL SERVICE
1-231972
ANIMAL CONTROL
LEASE LINE6
02/17/98
$5,330.00
HOPKINS PET IOSPITAL
KENNEL SERVICES
92'); ? 2 ., 47_
ANIMAL CONTROL,
LEASE L-INES
< *>
$11,820.00*
186352
02/17/98
$106.39
HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL
Chlorine, test tablet
16421
POOL TRACK GRE
CHEMICALS
1544
COUNCIL
CHEL -i. REGISTER
11 -rFB -1998 (18:49)
page 12
CHECK NO
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
186352
02/17/98
$26.70
HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL
Muriatic acid
16484
POOL TRACK GRE
''HEMICALS
02/17/98
$51.33
HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL
CHLORINE
16584
POOL TRACK GRE
CHEMICALS
1825
< *>
$184.42*
186353
02/17/98
$54.12
HUEBSCH
Towels, rugs
475318.
POOL TRACK GRE
SVC CONTR EQUI
02/17/98
$45.18
HUEBSCH
TOWELS, RAGS
479805
POOL TRACK GRE
SVC CONTR EQUI
< *>
$99.30*
186354
02/17/98
$10.00
Ice Skating Institute
DUES
02(1998
ED ADMTNTSTRAT
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$10.00*
1.86355
02/17/98
$69.22
TKON CAPTTAL
EQUIPMENT RENTAI.,
19721332
ART CENTER ADM
EOUIP PRNTAL
< *>
$69.22*
186356
02/17/98
$29.70
Ikon Office Solutions
Copy machine servic-
005281
ED ADMINISTRAT
SVC CONTR.EQTIl
02/17/98
$163.85
Ikon Office Solutions
Fax repair
134633
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
1984
02/17/98
$66.25
Ikon Offi.ce Solutions
Fax toner cartridge
F,(,RRSA
CENT SVC C;ENER
GENERAL SUPPLI
2098
< *>
$259.80*
186357
02/17/98
$263.00
Information Hotline
ADVERTISING OTHER
118730
50TH ST SELLIN
ADVERT OTHER
02/17/98
$263.00
Information Hotline
ADVERTISING OTHER
118730
YORK SELLING
ADVERT OTHER
02/17/98
$264.00
Information Hotline
ADVERTISING OTHER
118730
VERNON SELLING
ADVERT OTHER
< *>
$790.00*
186358
02/17/98
$903.05
INLAND TRUCK PARTS
Parts
481127
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORTES
1615
< *>
$903.05*
186359
02/17/98
$271.00
INTERLACHEN TRAVEL
MEETING EXPENSE
075217
PRO SHOP
MEETTNG EXPENS
< *>
$271.00*
186360
02/17/98
$216.47
INTERSTATE DETROIT DIESE
Shop parts
181478
EQUIPMENT OPER
CONTR REPAIRS
1419
02/17/98
$73.33
INTERSTATE DETROIT DIESE
Muffler
1nr458
EOTITPMENT OPER
REPATR PARTS
1411
< *>
$289.80*
186361
02/17/98
$460.00
J Patrick Moore & Partne
ADVERTISING OT14ER
14033
GOLF DOME
ADVERT OTHER
02/17/98
$489.67
J Patrick Moore & Partne
ADVERTISING OTHER
14034
GOLF DOME
ADVERT OTHER
02/17/98
$168.00
J Patrick Moore & Partne
ADVERTISING OTHER
14034
50TH ST SELLIN
ADVERT OTHER
02/17/98
$169.00
J Patrick Moore & Partne
ADVERTISING OTHER
14034
YORK SELLING
ADVERT OTHER
02/17/98
$168.00
J Patrick Moore & Partne
ADVERTISING OTHER
14034
VERNON SELLING
ADVERT OTHER
< *>
$1,454.67*
186362
02/17/98
$363.88
J.H. LARSON ELECTRICAL C
Elec parts
40486700
ART CENTER BLD
GENERAL SUPPLI
1663
02/17/98
$104.17
J.H. LARSON ELECTRICAL C
AC elec
40492530
ART CENTER BLD
GENERAL SUPPLI
1683
< *>
$468.05*
186363
02/17/98
$40.00
Jack McClard & Associate
Shop parts
16963
EQUIPMENT OPER
GENERAL SUPPLI
1417
< *>
$40.00*
186364
02 117199
$100.00
,TAMES, W11,I,1AM V
POT,ICE SRRVICE:;
11IM(;RA
CONTR 7;ERVT('ES
< *>
$100.00*
186365
02/17/98
$632.00
Jeane Thorne Inc
Temp service
00190549
ADMINISTRATION
PROF SERVICES
02/17/98
$572.00
Jeane Thorne Inc
Temp service
00190954
ADMT N I STRATI ON
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$1,204.00*
COUNCIL
CIIFC, r.''(',ISTER
1,1 _ sB -1998 ( 18:49)
I ago 13
CHECK NO
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE CHECK
AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT PO NUM
186366
02/17/98
$91.86
JERRY'S
FOODS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
012998
GOLF DOME
GENERAL SUPPLI
02/17/98
$112.72
JERRY'S
FOODS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
012998
ART SUPPLY GIF
GENERAL SUPPLI
02/17/98
$43.20
JERRY'S
FOODS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
012998
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$247.78*
186367
02/17/98
$421.74
JERRY'S
PRINTING
PRINTING
3947
INSPECTIONS
PRINTING
02/17/98
$26.25
JERRY'S
PRINTING
Food est insp forms
A4226
PUBLIC HEALTH
PRINTING
02/17/98
$74.69
JERRY'S
PRINTING
Season tickets
A4314
POOL ADMIN
PRINTING
02/17/98
$186.38
JERRY'S
PRINTING
Stats pool logo
A4374
POOL OPERATION
GENERAL SUPPLI
02/17/98
$229.98
JERRY'S
PRINTING:
PRINTING FORMS
A4419
PARK ADMIN.
PRTNTING
< *>
$939.04*
186368
02/17/98
$317.51
Johnson
Wholesale Floris
PLANTS
33123
POOL. TRACK GRF.
TREES FLWR SHR 1541
< *>
$317.51*
186370 02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
186371 02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
186372 02/17/98
186373 02/17/98
- $75.85
-$5.61
-$5.62
- $38.55
- $11.96
$2,173.39
$1,846.57
$1,625.03
$77.80
$29.04
$74.20
$2,108.79
$367.02
$3,914.14
$3,875.96
$4,480.64
$1,987.45
$74.85
$504.60
$3,397.58
$3,381.69
$3,377.00
$33,158.16*
$105.96
$92.09
$8.48
$206.53*
JOHNSON WINE CO
JOHNSON WINE CO
JOHNSON WINE CO
JOHNSON WINE CO
JOHNSON WINE CO
JOHNSON WINE CO
JOHNSON WINE CO
JOHNSON WINE CO
JOHNSON WINE CO
JOHNSON WINE CO
JOHNSON WINE CO
JOHNSON WINE CO
JOHNSON WINE CO
JOHNSON WINE CO
JOHNSON WINE CO
JOHNSON WINE CO
JOHNSON WINE CO
JOHNSON WINE CO
JOHNSON WINE CO
JOHNSON WINE CO
JOHNSON WINE CO
JOHNSON WINE CO
JOHNSON, NAOMI
JOHNSON, NAOMI
JOHNSON, NAOMI
$59.00 JOHNSON, TOM
$59.00*
$100.00 JOHNSON, WAL.TFR
$100.00*
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 49786
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 50571
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 50572
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 50682
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 50831
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 801334
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 801335
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 801339
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 803931
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 803932
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 803933
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 803934
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 803935
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 803936
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 803937
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 803938
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 803939
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 803940
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 804378
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 803203
COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 806201
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 806202
ART WORK SOLD 020598
CRAFT SUPPLIES 020598
MEDIA LAR SUPPLIES 020598
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER
ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES
MEDIA LAP GENERAL SUPPLI
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE n20998 POLICE DEPT. G UNTF ALLOW
POLICE. SERVICES 02(1998
186374 02/1_-7/99 $83.25 JOHNSTONS SAI,FS & SERVIC R�-pair vac
< *> $83.25*
186375 02/17/98 $971.73 JP FOODSERVICES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD
02/17/98 $366.84 JP FOODSERVICES INC GENERAL SUPPLIES
RFSFRVF PROGRA CONTR SERVTCES
17R51O1 (1.118 DOUSE
020298 GRILL
020298 GRILL
REPAIR PAR'I'S 2050
COST OF GD SOL
GENERAL SUPPLI
COUNCIL
CHEC- REGISTER
11 -r6B -1998
(18:49)
page 14
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
<*>
-- - - -
$1,338.57*
- -- -- -
--- ---- -- ---
- --
--
-
- -- -
-- --
186376
02/17/98
$64.01
JUSTUS LUMBER
Lumber
12229
CENTENNIAL LAK
PAINT
1522
02/17/98
$27.29
JUSTUS
LUMBER
PAINT
12773
CENTENNIAL LAK
PAINT
1522
< *>
$91.30*
186377
02/17/98
$832.00
KAEDING AND ASSOCIATES I
Eng sery
020498
MEDIA LAB CONS
CIP
< *>
$832.00*
186378
02/17/98
$227.00
KAHN,
DEBORAH MORSE.
MAGAZINE /NEWSLETTER E
020298
COMMUNICATIONS
MAG /NEWSLET EX
< *>
$227.00*
186379
02/17/98
$26.63
Kaman Industrial
Technol
REPAIR PARTS
Z154148
CENTENNIAL LAK
REPAIR PARTS
2013
< *>
$26.63*
186380
02/17/98
$41.89
KANE,
KENNETH
INSPECTION EXPENSES
020398
POLICE DEPT. G
INSP. EXP.
< *>
$41.89*
186381
02/17/98
$64.21
KARSTEN MANUFACTURING
CO
COST OF GOODS
- PRO S
3399810
PRO SHOP
COST OF GDS -PR
8835
< *>
$64.21*
186382
02/17/98
$105.01
KEPRIOS, JOHN
Reimbursement
020298
GOLF ADMINISTR
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$105.01*
186384
02/17/98
$200.80
Kiwi
Kai Imports
Inc
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
WI
86523
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
02/17/98
$719.75
Kiwi
Kai Imports
Inc
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
WI
86563
50TII ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
02/17/98
$161.60
Kiwi
Kai Imports
Inc
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
WI
86564
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
02/17/98
$109.00
Kiwi
Kai Imports
Inc
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
BE
86565
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
02/17/98
$64.80
Kiwi
Kai Imports
Inc
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
WI
86757
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
02/17/98
$695.00
Kiwi
Kai Imports
Inc
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
WE
80759
50TH ST SKLIA N
CST OF GD WINE
02/17/98
$289.80
Kiwi
Kai Imports
Inc
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
WE
H6760
5OTII ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
02/17/98
$154.40
Kiwi
Kai Imports
Inc
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
WI
86761
501H ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
02/17/98
$1,007.55
Kiwi
Kai Imports
Inc
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
WI
86762
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
02/17/98
$1,698.20
Kiwi
Kai Imports
Inc
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
WE
86763
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
02/17/98
- $47.50
Kiwi
Kai. Lmports
Inc
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
WI.CM2998
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
02/17/98
$1,270.20
Kiwi
Kai Imports
Inc
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
WI
87002
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
02/17/98
$1,520.50
Kiwi
Kai Imports
Inc
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
WI
87004
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
02/17/98
$1,960.10
Kiwi
Kai Imports
Inc
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
WI
87008
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
02/17/98
$87.20
Kiwi
Kai Imports
Inc
COST OF GOODS
SOLD
BE
87009
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
< *>
$9,891.40*
18638,
02/17/08
$22.32
Kla",
Trrry
R-vyvling cr -dit.
01279H
IT11,1TY I'Ro(l,
AcCOTINTS RFC.
< *>
$22.32*
IR618C
02/17/98
$247.68
KNOX
COMMERCIAL CREDIT
Lumber
i(11917
11111L1)1NG MAINT
GENL•;RAI, Slll'1'1,I
1281
02/17/98
$59.02
KNOX
COMMERCIAL CREDIT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
304407
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
1.484
02/17/98
$152.66
KNOX
COMMERCIAL CREDIT
Shop supplies
tnqM90
GENERAL MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$459.36*
186387
02/17/98
$158.67
KOJETIN,
BOB
Council table
supplie
020298
CON'T'INGENCIES
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$158.67*
186388
02/17/98
$51.53
KRUGE
AIR INC
GENERAL SUPPLIES
26216
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$51.53*
(1)UN('1I,
Clll•:c :(;1::'1'
-:11
it .1 1998 ( 18:49)
p g'. 15
CHECK NO
DATE
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
186389
02/17/98
$1,663.53
Kudos
TROPHIES
43647
EDINA ATHLETIC
GENERAL SUPPLI
1745
< *>
$1,663.53*
186390
02/17/98
$586.15
KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
202533
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
02/17/98
$930.40
KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
202706
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
< *>
$1,516.55*
186391
02/17/98
$270.00
LAKE COUNTRY CHAPTER
ICBO SEMINAR
020698
INSPECTIONS
CONF k SCHOOLS
< *>
$270.00*
186392
02/17/98
$118.24
LAWSON PRODUCTS INC.
Tape
1850943
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPLI
1584
02/17/98
02/17/98
$330.06
LAWSON PRODUCTS INC.
Shop supplies
1851996
EQUIPMENT OPER
GENERAL SUPPLI
1585
$384.40
LAWSON PRODUCTS INC.
Shop supplies
1851997
ST LIGHTING OR
PAINT
1582
02/17/98
02/17/98
$413.96
LAWSON PRODUCTS INC.
Sign shop
1851998
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1583
02/17/98
$342.67
$37.81
LAWSON PRODUCTS INC.
LAWSON
Misc shop supplies
1851999
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
1586
02/17/98
$401.07
PRODUCTS INC.
LAWSON PRODUCTS INC.
Shop parts
Shop
1854684
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
1585
02/17/98
$337.54
LAWSON PRODUCTS INC.
parts
Shop parts
1854685
1854686
STREET NAME SI
ST LIGHTING
GENERAL SUPPLI
1681
< *>
$2,365.75*
OR
GENERAL SUPPLI
1682
186393
02/17/98
$41.89
LEEF BROS. INC.
LAUNDRY
013198/G
MAINT OF COURS
LAUNDRY
< *>
$41.89*
186394
02/17/98
$46.88
Lentner, Laura Lee
Skating instructor Ed
012898
ED ADMINISTRAT
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$46.88*
186395
02/17/98
$35.89
LINHOFF
aDV
40380
ART CENTER ADM
ADVERT OTHER
02/1 -7/98
$106.39
LINHOFF
MAGAZINE /NEWSLETTER E
40738
COMMUNICATIONS
MAG /NEWSLET EX
< *>
$142.28*
186396
02/17/98
$4,829.79
LOGIS
DATA PROCESSING
AR0198
FINANCE
DATA PROCESSIN
02/17/98
02/17/98
$2,188.13
$4,745.77
LOGIS
LOGIS
DATA PROCESSING
AR0198
ASSESSING
DATA PROCESSIN
02/17/98
$191.62
LOGIS
DATA PROCESSING
AR0198
GENERAL(BILLIN
DATA PROCESSIN
02/17/98
$136.12
LOGIS
DATA PROCESSING
DATA PROCESSING
AR0198
AR0198
COMMUNICATIONS
DATA PROCESSIN
02/1'1/9fl
$1,293.56
LOGIS
FIQUrPMrNT REP1.A('rMF :NT
ARO1118
CONTINGENCIRS
I;NGINrrRrN(1 ( ;r
DATA PROCESSIN
RQUIP Rr•.r'LA('RM
$13,384.99+
186397
02/17/98
$75.00
Lucke, Mary
Skating instructor Ed
01 1098
ED ADMINISTRAT
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$75.00*
186398
02/17/98
02/17/98
$9.00
M. SHANKEN COMMUNICATION
Wine mag
358223
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
$9.00
M. SHANKEN COMMUNICATION
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
361248
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
02/17/98
$15.00
M. SHANKEN COMMUNICATION
Wine spectator
361715
LIQUOR 50TH ST
DUES k SUBSCRI
< *>
$33.00*
186399
02/17/98
$55.00
M.A.S.S.
Seminar
020398
PARK ADMIN.
CONF & SCHOOLS
< *>
$55.00*
186400
02/17/98
- $83.31
MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC.
Credit
96898
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
02/17/98
02/17/98
-$8.80
MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC.
Pulley
96898.
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
1979
02/17/98
$31.46
$95.50
MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC.
MAC
Supplies
29800972
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
9745
02/17/98
$76.62
QUEEN EQUIP INC.
MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC.
Shop
Shop
29801347
29801418
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1620
02/17/98
$355.85
MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC.
parts
Shop parts
29801419
EQUIPMENT OPER
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
1770
1770
COUNCIL CHEum REGISTER 11 -FEB -1998 (18:49) page 16
CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM
- - - -- --------------------
<*> $467.32*
186401 02/17/98
02/17/98
1.86402 02/17/98
186403 02/17/98
186404 02/17/98
186407 02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
186408 07./17/98
$10.54 Magnuson Sod /Haag Servic Sod 33107
$152.88 Magnuson Sod /Haag Servic Sod 3;101
$163.42*
$84.35 Mail Boxes Etc COLOR COPIES 7867
$84.35*
$157.50 Mairs, Candyce
$157.50*
$15.00 Marell, Pauline
$15.00*
$1,735.55
$618.07
$325.00
$582.70
$325.00
$154.45
$325.00
$413.35
$25.60
$3,391.45
$25.60
$99.90
$54.45
$158.00
$562.80
$9.60
$25.20
$18.15
$1,245.20
$2,134.63
$58.80
$72.00
$389.10
$61.50
$1,288.10
$325.00
$2,589.25
$85.85
$17,099.30*
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
MARK VII SALES
$612.00 MARTIN - MCAi,I,I`,'1'ER
$6.1.2.00*
Skating instructor Ed 012898
MAINT OF COURS SOD & DIRT 8320
MAINT OF LOURS SOD & DIRT 8320
ENGTNEERTN(', GE BLUE PRINTING 1140
ED ADMINISTRAT PROF SERVICES
Refund pool pass 020198 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 732685
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 732687
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 732831
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 732832
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 732833
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 732839
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 732840
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 732841
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 732842
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 732852
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 732853
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 732854
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 732855
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 733376
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 734979
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 734980
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 734981
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 734982
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 734984
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 734985
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 734986
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 734987
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 735102
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 735103
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 735119
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 735120
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 735136
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 735137
Pr- emp.l oynv-nt -va 1 8')',l
186409 02/17/98
$14.00
Manni.e,
Kristin.i
Claim, r,fund
< *>
$14.00*
186410 02/17/98
$295.00
Matrix
Communications
In Telephones
02/17/98
$215.11
Matrix
Communications
In PW AN /DG CON
02/17/98
$45.00
Matrix
Communications
In Vm Sr center
< *>
$555.11*
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE
50Th ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
5014 ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GUS BEE
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE
501'11 ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE
YPRK SELLING CST OF GDS MTX
('RNT "V(' (7ENER AI)VERT 1'E1?:,0NI,
01.'!'7')8 ART CNTR FROG RE(1TSTRATION F
30486 POLICE DEPT. G TELEPHONE
30566 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE
30596 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE
COUNCIL
CHECK_ -�GISTER
$7,524.00
11 6-1998 (18:49)
02/17/98
$1,881.00
< *>
page 17
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
186411
02/17/98
$50.00
MBC PRESENTATION
TAMM SEMINARS
020698
LIQUOR 50TH ST
PROF SERVICES
02/17/98
$129.10
02/17/98
$50.00
MBC PRESENTATION
TAMM SEMINAR
020698
LIQUOR YORK GE
PROF SERVICES
02/17/98
$50.00
MBC PRESENTATION
TAMM SEMINAR
020698
VERNON LIQUOR
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$150.00*
186412
02/17/98
$956.37
MCCAREN DESIGN
TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUB
6102
POOL TRACK GRE
TREES FLWR SHR
1268
< *>
$956.37*
186413
02/17/98
$197.69
MCKENZIE, TOM
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
020298
POLICE DEPT. G
CONF & SCHOOLS
02/17/98
$25.00
MCKENZIE, TOM
INSPECTION EXPENSES
020.398
POLICE DEPT. G
INSP. EXP.
< *>
$222.69*
186414
02/17/98
$438.00
MEDICA
Overpayment
971234
GENERAL FD PRO
AMBULANCE FEES
< *>
$438.00*
186415
02/17/98
$383.00
Medtox
PEE FOR SERVICE
01987911
CENT SVC GENER
ADVERT PERSONL
< *>
$383.00*
186416
02/17/98
$21.86
MENARDS * ACCT #30240251
Fan
7779
GOLF DOME
REPAIR PARTS
2048
< *>
$21.86*
186417
b2/17/98
$100.00
MERFELD, BURT
POLICE SERVICES
020998
RESERVE PROGRA
CONTR SERVICES
< *>
$100.00*
186418
02/17/98
$846.40
MERIT SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
47140
POOI, TRACK GRE
CLEANING SUPPL
1275
02/17/98
$413.90
MERIT SUPPLY
Soaking tank, gloves
47182
POOL TRACK GRE
GENERAL SUPPLI
1543
02/17/98
$881.66
MERIT SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
47199
POOL TRACK GRE
CLEANING SUPPL
1549
02/17/98
$2,065.04
MERIT SUPPLY
Scrubber
47205
EDINB /CL PROG
MACH. & EQUIP
1647
02/17/98
$242.28
MERIT SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
47241
CENTENNIAL LAK
CLEANING SUPPL
1740
02/17/98
$836.89
MERIT SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
47275
ARENA BLDG /GRO
CLEANING SUPPL
1805
02/17/98
$773.40
MERIT SUPPLY
Supplies
47292
EQUIPMENT OPER
SAFETY EQUIPME
1374
02/17/98
$567.75
MERIT SUPPLY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
47293
POOL TRACK GRE
CLEANING SUPPL
1823
02/17/98
$189.35
MERIT SUPPLY
Supplies
47310
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
1871
< *>
$6,816.67*
186419
02/17/98
$120.00
MESSERLI & KRAMER
Collect fees
012298
GENERAL FD PRO
AMBULANCE FEES
02/17/98
$292.69
MESSERLI & KRAMER
Collect fees
63801.
GENERAL FD PRO
AMBULANCE FEES
< *>
$412.69*
186420
02/17/98
$100.00
Metro Volley Ball Offici
Officiating fee
012798
EDINA ATHLETIC
PROF SERVICES
02/17/98
$100.00
Metro Volley Ball Offici
Officiating fee
020498
EDINA ATHLETIC
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$200.00*
186421
02/17/98
$7,524.00
02/17/98
$1,881.00
< *>
$9,405.00*
186422
02/17/98
$116.37
< *>
$116.37*
186423
02/17/98
$397.27
< * >
$39.7.2 "7*
186424
02/17/98
$159.70
02/17/98
$129.10
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Sac
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL, Sac
Micron Eloctroni.c:: Inc DATA PROCESSING
MIDWEST CHEMICAL S11P111,Y Cleaning r:uppl i r -f:
BRAEMAR GENERAL FD PRO SAC CHARGES
DEC 1997 GENERAL, FD PRO SAC CHARGES
Ir;O; ?052 POLICE DEPT. C DATA 11RO('RSSTN 127()
CITY HAIL GENE PAPER SUPPLIES 1921
MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 06213609 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
MIDWEST COCA -COLA ROTTLT COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 061-112704 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
COUNCIL
CHEur, REGISTER
11 -rEB -1998 (18:49)
page 18
CHECK NO
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------.------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT:
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
186424
02/17/98
$113.60
MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
06213711
- VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
02/17/98
$73.75
MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
06513006
YORK SELLING
CS.!' rF GDS MIX
02/17/98
$99.85
MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
06521303
50TH ST SELLIN
CST uF GDS MIX
< *>
$576.00*
186425
02/17/98
$300.00
MIKE'S SEPTIC SERVICE
Pump drain traps
8059
CENTENNIAL LAK
CONTR REPAIRS
<*>
$300.00*
186426
02/17/98
$700.00
Miller, Tom
GROUP LESSON INSTRUCT
020698
GOLF DOME
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$700.00*
186427
02/17/98
$2,084.93
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
022198
ARENA•BLDG /GRO
HEAT
02/17/98
$4,502.06
MINNEGASCO
HEAT
022198
GOLF DOME .
.HEAT
02/17/98
$1,079.98
MI14NEGASCO
HEAT
02219 -8
ARENA BLDG /GRO
HEAT
< *>
$7,666.97*
186428
02/17/98
$622.00.
Minnesota Bride Magazine
ADVERTISTNG OTHER
('4702
ED ADMTNISTRAT
ADVERT OTHER
< *>
$622.00*
186429
02/17/98
$240.80
MINNESOTA CLAY USA
COST OF GOODS SOLD
33135
ART SUPPLY GIF
COST OF GD SOL
3135
02/17/98
$101.10
MTNNESOTA CLAY 1151A
CRAFT SUPPLIES
3';11;
ART CENTEP ADM
CRAFT SUPP1.TES
3135
<>
$341.90*
186430
02/17/98
$73.15
MINNESOTA ELEVATOR INC
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQU
10331
POOL TRACK GRE
SVC CONTR EQUI
< *>
$73.15*
186431
02/17/98
$38.86
MINNESOTA GLOVE INC
Gloves
013030
GENERAL MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
1684
< *>
$38.86 *.
186432
02/17/98
$952.00
MINNESOTA PIPE k EQUIPME
Curbstop repair tops
(1167
DTSTRIBUTTON
GENERAL SUPPLI.1655
< *>
$952.00*
186433
02/17/98
$3,041.33
MINNESOTA STATE TREASURE
Surcharge
DEC1997.
GENERAL FD PRO
SURTAX
< *>
$3,041.33*
186434 .02/17/98
$31.00
MINNESOTA SUN PUBLICATIO
Pub hearing notice
078320
ADMINISTRATION
ADVERTISING LE
02/17/98
$131.44
MINNESOTA SUN PUBLICATIO
Budgeting summary
078325
ADMINISTRATION
ADVERTISING LE
-
02/17/98
$119.12
MINNESOTA SUN-PUBLTCATTO
Ad for bid
OR0039
ADMINTSTRATION
ADVERTISING LE
< *>
$281.56*
186435
02/17/98
$20.00
Minnesota Surveyors & En
Dues
012798
ENGINEERING GE
DUES k SUBSCRI
< *>
$20.00*
186436
02/17/98
$24.23
Minnesota Vikings Food S
MEETING EXPENSE
161.0097
T -494 COMMISSI.MEETTNG
EXPENS
< *>
$24.23*
186437
.02/17/98
$133.13
Mint Condition Detailing
LAUNDRY
11145
POLICE DEPT. G
LAUNDRY
1734
< *>
$133.13*
186438
02/17/98
$87.00
Mitchell /Repair Informat
Windows -shop
5037280
EQUIPMENT OPER
DATA PROGESSIN
1989
02/17/98
$87.00
Mitchell /Repair Informat.Windows
5011577
EQUIPMENT.OPER
DATA PROCESSIN
< *>
$174.00*
186439
02/17/98
$395.00
MSP COMMUNICATIONS
ADVERTISING OTHER
TC58170
ED ADMINISTRAT
ADVERT OTHER
< *>
$395.00*
COUNCIL
CHEC,. EGISTER
11 _..,B -1998 (18:49)
page 19
CHECK NO
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
186440
02/17/98
$141.69
MTI DISTRIBUTING
CO
PARTS
I1.86373
CENTENNIAL, LAK
REPAIR
PARTS
8869
02/17/98
$72.47
MTI DISTRIBUTING
CO
GEARBOX
I1.86471
CENTENNIAL LAK
REPAIR
PART'S
8869
02/17/98
$60.36
MTI DISTRIBUTING
CO
REPAIR PARTS
I199724
CENTENNIAL LAK
REPAIR
PARTS
1125
02/17/98
$95.15
MTI DISTRIBUTING
CO
REPAIR PARTS
I199853
CENTENNIAL LAK
REPAIR
PARTS
1125
02/17/98
$227.82
MTI DISTRIBUTING
CO
REPAIR PARTS
I200742
CENTENNIAL LAK
REPAIR
PARTS
02/17/98
$529.40
MTI DISTRIBUTING
CO
Repair to groundmaste
I200763
CENTENNIAL LAK
REPAIR
PARTS
02/17/98
$8.00
MTI DISTRIBUTING
CO
GASKET
7201351
CENTENNIAL LAK
REPAIR
PARTS
1743
< *>
$1,134.89*
186441
02/17/98
$330.00
MTI DISTRIBUTING
CO
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
013098
PARK MAINTENAN
CONF &
SCHOOLS
1895
< *>
$330.00*
186442
02/17/98
$10.00
MUNICI -PALS
MEETING EXPENSE
020298
CONTINGENCIES
MEETING EXPENS
< *>
$10.00*
186443
02/17/98
$197.18
MUNICILITE CO
Shop parts
9543
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
1956
02/17/98
$57.51
MUNICILITE CO
Shop parts
9552
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR
PARTS
1407
02/17/98
$374.04
MUNICILITE CO
Shop parts
9559
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR
PARTS
1407
02/17/98
$124.68
MUNICILITE CO
Shop parts
9592
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR
PARTS
1407
< *>
$753.41*
186444
02/17/98
$230.13
MURPHY, SYDNEY
Skating instructor Ed
01.2898
ED ADMINISTRAT
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$230.13*
186445
02/17/98
$132.15
MUZAK
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQU
010198
CENTENNIAL LAK
SVC CONTR EQUI
< *>
$132.15*
186446
02/17/98
$15.00
NATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUND
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
012898
BUILDING MAINT
DUES &
SURSCRT
< *>
$15.00*
186447
02/17/98
$150.00
NATIONAL HIGHWAY
INSTITU
PCCP SEMINAR JOHN SCH
020698
TRAINING
CONE &
SCHOOLS
< *>
$150.00*
186448
02/17/98
$311.50
NEHA
Resource books
R26995
PUBLIC HEALTH
CONF &
SCHOOLS
1810
< *>
$311.50*
186449
02/17/98
$58.00
NELSON, DAVID
INSPECTION EXPENSES
020398
POLICE DEPT. G
INSP. EXP.
< *>
$58.00*
186450
02/17/98
$29.50
NIBBE, MICHAEL
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
020998
POLICE DEPT. G
UNIF ALLOW
< *>
$29.50*
1.86451
02/17/98
$100.00
NISSEN, DICK
POLICE SERVICES
020998
RESERVE PROGRA
CONTR SERVICES
< *>
$10().00*
1 80.4'-12
02117/98
:;:7!,5.29
NOR'PH AMVR IC'AN l ;Af,T
CO.
Ilwy r.I It.
I 0 + 1 + /00
::NOW J, I CR REM
SAI.T
8781
02 / 1,7 14
$4, 386. 93
NORTH AMER i CAN , ;A[.'I*
CO.
Ilwy ::.I I I-
I n + + + 1 (, 0
!:N(IIJ h I +'I: PF,
:.AI,'I'
*
j' 14:.. 22*
18(; 453
02/17/98
$! >4.60
NORTH STAR ]CE
COST OI' C;OOLJS ::01.1 -) M1
81`)19
50'1•II ST ::N.LL.IN
CST OF
C;US M1X
02/17/98
$74.40
NORTH STAR ICE
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
82803
VERNON SELLING
CST OF
GDS•MIX
02/17/98
$59.40
NORTH STAR ICE
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
83401
YORK SELLING
CST OF
GDS MIX
< *>
$188.40*
186454
02/17/98
$26.97
NORTH STAR INTERNATIONAL
Shop parts
177553
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR
PARTS
1614
COUNCIL
CHFC. REGISTER
11 -eEB 1998 (18:49)
page 20
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
- - -< *<- -
- -
$26.97*
186455
02/17/98
$79.26
NORTH.STAR TURF
REPAIR PARTS
161849
MAINT OF LOURS
REPAIR PARTS
1857
< *>
$79.26*
186456
02/17/98
$46.82
NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY
COST OF GOODS SOLD
261781
ART SUPPI,Y GIF
COST OF GD SOL
1554
< *>
$46.82*
]- 8r,,457
02/17/98
5210:61
NORTHWESTERN TI RR CO
TIRES & TUBES
-4 1666
EQUIPMENT NT• OPER -TIRES
& 11114ES
1 34 i
02/17/98
$33.57
NORTHWESTERN.TIRE CO
TIRES & TUBES
44033
EQUIPMENT OPER
TIRES & TUBES
1343
02/17/98
$42.00
NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO
Road service
44097
EQUIPMENT OPER
TIRES & TUBES
1343
< *>
$286.18*
186458
02/17/98
$48.21
NOVAK'S GARAGE
TRACTOR REPAIRS
8230
CENTENNIAL LAK
CONTR REPAIRS
< *>
$48.21*
-
186459
02/17/98
$1,855.00
NSP
Street lighting Braem
020498
PKBOND CIP.
EQUIP REPLACEM
< *>
$1,855.00*
-
186460
02/17/98
$102.24
OLSEN CHAIN & CABLE CO
I Polypros
175168
LIFT STATION M
GENERAL SUPPLI
1029
02/17/98
$480.32
OLSEN CHAIN & CABLE CO
I Chain
175288 -
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
1667
02/17/98
$295.36
OLSEN CHAIN & CABLE CO
I.REPAIR PARTS
175378
MAINT OF COURS
REPAIR PARTS
1573
02/17/98
$256.41
OLSEN CHAIN & CABLE CO
I ROPE
17G093
GOLF DOME
REPAIR PARTS
1862
< *>
$1,134.33*
186461
02/17/98
$35.28
OLWIN, ROGER
INSPECTION EXPENSES
020698
POLICE DEPT. G
INSP. EXP.
< *>
$35.28*
186462
02/17/98
$2,893.38
Omni Productions
CONSTR.' IN PROGRESS
7585,
ICE ARENA PROG
CIP
1648
02/17/98
$740.57
Omni Productions
GENERAL SUPPLIES"
7588
ARENA BLDG /GRO
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$3,633.95*
186463
02/17/98
- $45.00
OPM INFORMATION SYSTEM
Install credit
630702
COMMUNICATIONS
EQUIP REPLACEM
02/17/98
- $45.00
OPM INFORMATION SYSTEM
Install credit
630702
COMMUNICATIONS
EQUIP REPLACEM
02./17/98
$2,134.33
OPM INFORMATION SYSTEM
Service Contract
1? 7 -A5:3
CENT SVC GFNFR
SVC - CONTR FQTTI
< *>
$2,044.33*
186464
02/17/98
$59.64
ORKIN
Pest control
190659
CITY HAIL, GENE
CONTR REPAIRS
2060
< *>
$59.64*
186465
02/17/98
$79.00
OTIS SPUNKMEYRR INC -
COST OF GOODS SOLD
11232635
CENTENNIAL LAK
COST OF GD SOL
< *>
$79.00*
1864C,G
02/17/98
$500.00
Our Lady c,r I`,:ic,•
REVITND DAMA(.I' DEPOSIT
01'71)fa
PRO(',
RENTAL 1NCOMT?
< *>
$500.00*
18646'7
02/1.7/98
$377.74
PAGTNG NETWORK OF MINNFS
EQUIPMENT RENTAL,
0:'01'18
r,omCT? r*:0-.
E011T1' RFNT'A1,
*>
$.171.•14*
186469
02/17/98
$1,470.77
PARTS PLUS
REPAIR PARTS
012498
FQIIIPMENT C)PER
REPAIR PARTS
< *.•
$1,4'70.77*
186469
02/17/98
$14.00
PEICK, JUNE
Class refund
012798
ART CNTR PROG
REGISTRATION F
<*>
$14.00*
COUNCIL
CHEC, ,GISTER
11- -8 -1998
(1.8:49)
page 21
CHECK NO
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT PO NUM
186470
02/17/98
$12.58
PELECIS,
MARA
Reimbursement
art
slip
0129
ED ADMINISTRAT
GENERAL
SUPPLT
< *>
$12.58*
186471
02/17/98
$39.80
PEPSI -COLA
COMPANY
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
MI
49556510
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GDS MIX
02/17/98
$72.00
PEPSI -COLA
COMPANY
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
49269151
CENTENNIAL LAK
COST OF GD SOL
02/17/98
$69.65
PEPSI -COLA
COMPANY
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
MI
47106808
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GDS MIX
02/17/98
$149.25
PEPSI -COLA COMPANY
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
49533106
GRILL
COST OF GD SOL 1394
02/17/98
$154.23
PEPSI -COLA
COMPANY
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
MI
48141243
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GDS MIX
< *>
$484.93*
186472
02/17/98
$200.00
Peterson,
Dorothy
Accomp
tap group
012998
SENIOR CITIZEN
PROF
SERVICES
< *>
$200.00*
186475
02/17/98
-$4.56
PHILLIPS
WINE & SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
28679
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WINE
02/17/98
-$4.24
PHILLIPS
WINE & SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
28680
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WINE
02/17/98
-$8.42
PHILLIPS
WINE & SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
28681
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WINE
02/17/98
- $24.00
PHILLIPS
WINE & SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
28682
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WINE
02/17/98
$136.15
PHILLIPS
WINE & SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
358125
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WINE
02/17/98
$48.55
PHILLIPS
WINE & SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
MI
358126
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GDS MIX
02/17/98
$521.23
PHILLIPS
WINE & SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
358127
50TII ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
LIQU
02/17/98
$1,524.80
PHILLIPS
WINE & SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
358128
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WINE
02/17/98
$1,646.19
PHILLIPS
WINE & SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
358132
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WINE
02/17/98
$378.00
PHILLIPS
WINE & SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
359672
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WINE
02/17/98
$378.00
PHILLIPS
WINE & SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
359673
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WINE
02/17/98
$432.91
PHILLIPS
WINE & SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
360086
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
LIQU
02/17/98
$971.80
PHILLIPS
WINE & SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
360087
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WINE
02/17/98
$1,665.70
PIIILLIPS
WINE & SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
360088
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD
LIQU
02/17/98
$2,435.86
PHILLIPS
WINE & SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
360089
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WINE
02/17/98
$588.96
PHILLIPS
WINE & SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
360090
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD
LIQU
02/17/98
$2,504.25
PHILLIPS
WINE & SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOI.D
WI
360091
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WTNE
02/17/x8
$12.4.00
PIIILLIPS
WINE & SIIIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
sole
I.I
+6n'� o 3
YORK SHI,I,ING
CST
OF
(:)
1,1011
02/1'1/98
$298.00
PIIILLIPS
WINE & SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
360.325
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GU
LIQU
02/17/98
$183.00
PHILLIPS
WINE & SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
360326
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WINE
02/17/98
$91.31
PHILLIPS
WINE & SPIRTTS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
360,105
50TH :,T SELLIN
CST
OF
GD
WINE
02/17/98
$300.24
PIIII LLPS
WINE & ';I'IRI'I':.
COST
OF
GOODS
::OI,U
LI
36n.106
VERNON gP1.1,1NG
CST
of
(.I)
1, 1Qu
02/1'7/98
$91.58
PHILLIPS
WINE & SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOOIJS
SOLD
WI
-1 407
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GI)
WINE
02/17/98
$455.65
PHILLIPS
WINE & SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
361870
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD
LIQU
02/17/98
$6,287.91
PHILLIPS
WINE & SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
361871
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD
WINE
02/17/98
$606.30
PHILLIPS
WINE & SPIRITS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
LI
361873
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD
LIQU
< *>
$21,629.17*
186476
02/17/98
$298.70
PINNACLE
DISTRIBUTING
COST
OF
GOODS
SOI,D
MI
96 950 9
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GDS
MIX
02/17/98
$552.00
PINNACLE
DISTRIBUTING
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
MI
969552
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GUS
MIX
02/17/98
$239.20
PINNACLE
DISTRIBUTING
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
MI
969589
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GDS
MIX
02/17/98
$2.94.40
PINNACLE
DISTRII I)TING
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
MI
VERNON SEI.I.TNG
CST
OF
GDS
MIX
02/1.7/98
$408.70
PINNACLE
DISTRIBUTING
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
ML
9696 U'7
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GDS
MIX
02/17/98
$483.76
PINNACLE
DISTRIBUTING
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
MT
969(110
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GDS
MIX
< *>
$2,276.76*
186477
02/17/98
$121.49
Pirtek Plymouth
CONTRACTED
REPAIRS
OR51
CENTENNIAL LAK
CONTR REPAIRS
< *>
$121.49*
r.
186478
02/17/98
$85.00
POSTMASTER
Presort
permit
00303
021798
CENT SVC GENER
POSTAGE
< *>
$85.00*
COUNCIL CHECz, REGISTER 11 -eE B -1998 (18:49) page 22
CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
186479 02/17/98 $128.00 POSTMASTER 4 rolls stamps 012898 CENT SVC GFNER POSTAGE
c *> $128.00*
186480 02/17/98
186481 02/17/98
c *>
186482 02/17/98
02/17/98
186484 02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98.
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
02/17/98
$310.00 POSTMASTER
$300.00*
Senior newsletter
$608.47 . PRAIRIE EQUIPMENT COMPAN Pump parts
$608.47*
$4,046.88 Precision Tree Company, Tree trimming
$3,269.97 Precision Tree Company, TREE TRIMMING
$7,316.85*
$410.00
$643.35
$565.16
$390.65
$580.17
$68.40
$399.00
$942.98
$53.45
$102.60
$351.70
$96.45
$1,676.88
$196.60
$154.35
$171.00
$213.75
$700.72
$380.70
$754.55
$175.90
$1,327.43
$26.15
$10,381.94*
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
PRIOR.WINE COMPANY
PRIOR WINE COMPANY.
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
PRIOR WINE COMPANY -
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
PRIOR WINE COMPANY
020398 CENT SVC GENER POSTAGE
1070 PONDS .& LAKES REPAIR PARTS 8927
1 TREE TRIMMING PROF SERVICES
BILL 42 TREE TRIMMING PROF SERVICES
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
56200
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
65783
COST
OF
GOODS-SOLD
WI
65785
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
68506
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
68510
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
68511
COST
OF'GOODS
SOLD
WI
68534
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
68518
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
MI
68519
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI.
68520
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
6.8524
COST
OF
GOODS.SOLD
< *>
WI
.68530
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
68531
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
MI
68532
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
68533
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
68534
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
70594
COST
OF.GOODS
84354
SOLD
WI
70597
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
70603
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
70605
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
7061.0
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI'70612
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
MI
70613
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
YORK SELLING CST. OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD -WINE
VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE
YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX
186485
02/17/98
$196.00
PROGRESSIVE CONSULTING
E ENO SERVICES
98031.01
GENFRAL(RII,LIN
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$196.00*
186486
02/1.7/98
$61.24
R &R SPECIALTIES INC
GENERAL SUPPLIES
7356
ARENA ICE MAIN
GENERAL
SIIPPL,T
1816
< *>
$61.24*
186487
02./1'7/98
$300.00
R.J.K. Craft!:
FQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
I
UITY IIAI.I,
E0111P
RFI'LACEM
- *>
$300.00*
3.86488
02/17/98
$220.46
RADISSON ARROWWOOD
Hotel
020698
ADMINISTRATION
CONF k
SCHOOLS
< *>
$220.46*
186489
02117198
$122.20
RDO EQ11I1'MENT CO
!;hop parts
1I- Ir,Or,
I ?QI111'MENT OPFR
R11'AIR
PARTS
9546
02/17/98
$314.38
RDO EQUIPMENT CO
Shop pat -Le
83!'75
EQl11PMENT OPER
REPAIR
PAR'I'S.
9782
0.2/17/98
$10.36
RDO EQUIPMENT CO
Shop parts
84354
EQUIPMENT OPER.REPAIR
PARTS
1187
02/17/98
$206.61`
RDO EQUIPMENT CO
Shop parts
84347
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR
PARTS
1187
02/17/98
$49.37
RDO EQUIPMENT CO
Forestry parts
AFI-1"73
TREES & MALNTE
REPAIR
PARTS
1879
COUNCIL
CHEC. GISTER
11 s -1998 (18:49)
23
page
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
- ----------------------
VENDOR
-----------------------
DESCRIPTION
--------------
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
<*>
$702.92*
----------------------------------------
186490
02/17/98
$2,124.00
RECREATION SPORTS OFFICI
Basketball official
013098
EDINA ATHLETIC
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$2,124.00*
186491
02/17/98
$10.00
Reding, Linda
Refund pool pass
020398
GENERAL FD PRO
REGISTRATION F
< *>
$10.00*
186492
02/17/98
$50.00
Regnier, Ruth
REFUND SWIMMING
020998
GENERAL FD PRO
REGISTRATION F
< *>
$50.00*
186493
02/17/98
$3,060.00
Rehrig Pacific Company
Recycling bins
KE43732
RECYCLING
GENERAL SUPPLI
1534
< *>
$3,060.00*
186494
02/17/98
$76.00
RETAIL DATA SYSTEM OF MI
Cash register program
5 "7465
POOL TRACK GRE
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$76.00*
186495
02/17/98
$410.00
RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPA
Plumbinq
4318
CITY HALL GENE
CONTR REPAIRS
2061
< *>
$410.00*
186496
02/17/98
$175.00
Rickoro, John
GROUP LESSON INSTRUCT
020698
GOLF DOME
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$175.00*
186497
02/17/98
$98.60
RTTE -WAY WATERPROOFING
Job canceled
97003746
GENERAL, FD PRO
BUTLDING PERMI
< *>
$98.60*
186498
02/17/98
$40.50
Ritz Camera
PHOTO PROCESSING
3754706
SAN.SEWER
CIP
02/17/98
$40.50
Ritz Camera
CONSTR. IN PROGRESS
3754706
SAN.SEWER
CIP
< *>
$81.00*
186499
02/17/98
$376.68
RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON EQ CO
Street dept
C07925
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1342
< *>
$376.68*
186500
02/17/98
$300.00
SALUD AMERICA
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
1800
YORK SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
< *>
$300.00*
186501
02/17/98
$72.04
SAX ARTS & CRAFTS
COST OF GOODS SOLD
0306041
ART SUPPLY GIF
COST OF GD SOL
1551
< *>
$72.04*
,
186502
02/17/98
$50.00
Schall, David
Retainer reimbursemen
012998
POOL OPERATION
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$50.00*
186503
02/17/98
$50.00
SCHWARTZ, S.A.
INSPECTION EXPENSES
020398
POLICE DEPT. G
INSP. EXP.
< *>
$50.00*
186504
02/17/98
$71.34
SEARS
Tools
SR756784
POOL TRACK GRE
TOOLS
1546
02/17/98
$149.61
SEARS
Tool box
62731111
EQUIPMENT OPER
TOOLS
1783
< *>
$220.95*
186505
02/17/98
$90.00
SECURITY LINK
ALARM SERVICE
15086889
CENTENNIAL LAK
ALARM SERVICE
n2/17/98
$92.41
SECURITY LINK
ALARM SERVICE
15ORC•891
POOL TRACK GRE
ALARM SERVICE
< *>
$182.41*
186506
02/17/98
$100.00
SHEPARD, JOHN
POLICE SERVICES
020998
RESERVE PROGRA
CONTR SERVICES
< *>
$100.00*
COUNCIL
CHEun REGISTER
11-FEB-1998 (18:49)
page 24
CHECK NO
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
186507
02/17/98
$45.00
STEMS, JEFFERY
BOOKS & PAMPHLETS
012898
FIRE DEPT. GEN
BOOKS & PAMPHL
< *>
$45.00*
186508
02/17/98
$42.00
SIGNAL SYSTEM
Time cards
9195
ED ADMINISTRAT
GENERAL SUPPLI
1742
02/17/98
$181.49
SIGNAL SYSTEM
Repair to time clock
63974
PARK ADMIN.
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$223.49*
186509
02/17/98
$55.94
SIITARI, MICHAEL
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
020298
POLICE DEPT. G
FIRST AID SUPP
02/17/98
$49.00
SIITARI, MICHAEL
INSPECTION EXPENSES
020398
POLICE DEPT. G
INSP. EXP.
< *>
$104.94*
186510
02/17/98
$280.25
SIMPLEX TIME RECORDER CO
Time clock
82755434
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
< *>
$280.25*
186511
02/17/98
$197.43
S1 MS SECURITY
SECURITY
8428867
POOL TRACK GRE
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$197.43*
186512
02/17/98
$80.94
Smith Winter Products
Plow repair parts
8823
PATHS & HARD S
REPAIR PARTS
1775
< *>
$80.94*
186513
02/17/98
$82.88
SMITH, AMY
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
020998
CLUB HOUSE
MILEAGE
< *>
$82.88*
186514
02/17/98
$9.96
SOKKIA MEASURING SYSTEM
Survey supplies
8009242R
ENGINEERING GE
DUES & SUBSCRI
1926
< *>
$9.96*
186515
02/17/98
$58.00
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
57508
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
02/17/98
$1,096.70
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
80152
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
02/17/98
$21.45
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
80153
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS MIX
02/17/98
$1,222.70
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I
COST OF GOODS SOLD HE
80360
50111 ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
02/17/98
$1,444.70
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
80361
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
02/17/98
- $13.20
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
58102
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
02/17/98
$292.30
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
80573
50Th ST SELLIN
CST OF GDS BEE
02/17/98
$2,659.00
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
80575
YORK SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
02/17/98
$83.75
SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I
COST OF GOODS SOLD MI
80876
YORK :TELLING
CST OF GDS MIX
< *>
$6,865.40*
186516
02/17/98
$140.63
Speiser, Brenna
Skating instructor
012898
ED ADMINISTRAT
PROF SERVI"PS
< *>
$140.63*
186517
02/17/98
$600.00
SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED
Continuing disclosure
020398
GENERAL FD PRO
DUE FROM HRA
< *>
$600.00*
186518
02/17/98
$488.10
SPS
Shower parts
2848316
POOL TRACK GRE
REPAIR PARTS
1545
02/17/98
$124.46
SPS
Parts
2850021
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
1662
02/17/98
$154.64
SPS
Shower parts
7953511
POnL TRACK GRE
REPAIR PARTS
1822
< *>
$767.20*
186519
02/17/98
$69.08
ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO
Parts
5162485
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1.613
02/17/98
- $55.12
ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO
Paid twice
012798
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORZES
02/17/98
$205.48
ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO
Shop parts
SI62830
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1637
02/17/98
$74.28
ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO
Shop parts
SI62853
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1640
< *>
$293.72*
186520
02/17/98
$3,351.47
STAN MORGAN & ASSOCIATES
Air door & installati
46685
LIQUOR PROG
MACH. & EQUIP
1242
COUNCIL
CHECK REGISTER
11 -FEB -1998 (18:49)
page 25
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
--
< *<
$3,351.47*
- ---------
- - - - -- ---
- - - - -- ---------------
- - - - --
186521
02/1.7/98
$3,221.75
STAR TRIBUNE
Help wanted ads
013198
CENT SVC GENER
ADVERT PERSONL
2012
< *>
$3,221.75*
186522
02/17/98
$30.00
STATE BOARD OF ELECTRICI
Permit
012798
CITY HALL GENE
REPAIR PARTS
< *>
$30.00*
186523
02/17/98
$48.00
Stop Stick LTD
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
5890
POLICE DEPT. G
SAFETY EQUIPME
1706
< *>
$48.00*
186524
02/17/98
$648.72
STORAGE EQUIPMENT INC
LOCKER PARTS
065366
CENTENNIAL LAK
GENERAL SUPPLI
2151
< *>
$648.72*
186525
02/17/98
$528.00
Streed, Esther
Overpayment ambulance
`)72911
GENERAL FD PRO
AMBULANCE FEES
< *>
$528.00*
186526
02/17/98
$45.21
STREICHERS
AMMUNITION
433401
POLICE DEPT. G
AMMUNITION
1811
02/17/98
$820.17
STREICHERS
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
420651
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP REPLACEM
02/17/98
$127.30
STREICHERS
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
437851
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP MAINT
02/17/98
$116.88
STREICHERS
BATTERY STACKS
44112.1
FIRE DEPT. GEN
GENERAL SUPPLI
1476
02/17/98
$68.93
STREICHERS
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
44187.1
POLICE DEPT. G
EQUIP MAINT
1711
02/17/98
$149.10
STREICHERS
AMMUNITION
44462.1
POLICE DEPT. G
AMMUNITION
1710
< *>
$1,327.59*
186527
02/1.7/98
$60.00
STROH, STEVE
INSPECTION EXPENSES
020398
POLICE DEPT. G
INSP. EXP.
< *>
$60.00*
186528
02/17/98
$186.19
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
Shop supplies
14109
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1624
02/17/98
$262.21
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
Shop supplies
14202CVW
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1625
02/17/98
$85.53
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
Parts
14247
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1631
02/17/98
$11.33
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
Parts
14369
EQUIPMENT OPER
ACCESSORIES
1633
02/17/98
$11.94
SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
Shop supplies
1.4606
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1636
< *>
$557.20*
186529
02/1 -7/98
$128.72
Super America
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
020298
POLICE DEPT. (;
MILFAGF
< *>
$128.72*
186530
02/17/98
$63.92
SUTPHEN CORPORATION
Parts
281.00022
EQUTPMENT OPER
CONTR REPAIRS
9987
< *>
$63.92*
186531
02/17/98
$100.00
SWANSON, HAROLD
POLICE. SERVICES
020998
RESERVE PROGRA
CONTR SERVICES
< *>
$100.00*
186532
02/17/98
$66.03
Tape Di- r:trihiitarr of Min
(1RNFRAL, SUPPI,TF:.
a
I'OT,Trr. DEPT. G
(;FNRRAL, SUPTITJ
1707
< *>
186533
02/17/98
$570.00
Tauges Redpath & (-o LTD
Permit: works training
020198
TNSPECPIONS
CONE h SCHOOLS
< *>
$570.00*
186534
02/17/98
$4,999.60
TAYLOR k ASSOCIATES
CHATSF. LOUNGES
01
SWIM FROG
MACH. & EQUIP
1806
< *>
$4,999.60*
186535
02/17/98
$300.00
Taylor Technologies Inc
Computer training
11015
ENGINEERING GE
CONE k SCHOOLS
1607
< *>
$300.00*
COUNCIL
CHEC... REGISTER
ll -r6B -1998 (18:49)
page 26
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
186536
02/17/98
$225.00
TELEX COMMUNICATIONS
Radio service
1192390
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONTR REPAIRS
< *>
$225.00*
186537
02/17/98
$125.50
'THERAPISTS OFFICE SOLUTI
Sound screen
026005
ENGINEERING "5
GENERAL SUPPLI
1532
< *>
$125.50*
186538
02/17/98
$12,109.95
THOMSEN- NYBECK
Prosecution
119332
LEGAL SERVICES
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$12,109.95*
186539
02/17/98
$70.20
THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
124983
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
02/17/98
$1,651.10
THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
125137
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
02/17/98
$23.30
THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
125138
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
02/17/98
$1,396.60
THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP
COST OF GOODS SOLD BE
125668
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GDS BEE
< *>
$3,141.20*
186540
02/17/98
$47.57
TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPL
TOOLS
152862
MAINT OF COURS
TOOLS
1567
02/17/98
$42.81
TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPL
Sign shop
153120
STREET NAME SI
GENERAL SUPPLI
1581
< *>
$90.38*
186541
02/17/98
$22.17
TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS I
OFFICE SUPPLIES
5227
GOLF DOME
OFFICE SUPPLIE
1517
< *>
$22.17*
186542
02/17/98
$1,851.00
Tri -Tech Electrical Cont
CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER
3392
PKBOND CIP
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$1,851.00*
186543
02/17/98
$127.50
Twin Cities Service Cent
Repairs
I15303
EQUIPMENT OPER
RADIO SERVICE
1623
02/17/98
$172.49
Twin Cities Service Cent
Repair
I15304
EQUIPMENT OPER
RADIO SERVICE
1628
02/17/98
$148.75
Twin Cities Service Cent
RADIO SERVICE
I15471
FIRE DEPT. GEN
CONTR REPAIRS
1966
< *>
$448.74*
186544
02/17/98
$116.26
TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO
REPAIR PARTS
044754
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
1788
02/17/98
$75.68
TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO
Street dept
044658
PW BUILDING
REPAIR PARTS
1660
< *>
$191.94*
186545
02/17/98
$77.14
TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO
Oxygen, nitrous
405293
FIRE DEPT. GEN
FIRST AID SUPP
1111
02/17/98
$29.92
TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO
OXYGEN
406963
FIRE DEPT. CEN
FIRST AID SUPP
1111
< *>
$107.06*
186546
02/17/98
$66.31
TWIN CITY SAW SERVICE CO
Forestry Parts
7831
TREES & MAINTE
REPAIR PARTS
1668
< *>
$66.31*
186547
02/17/98
$129.16
U.S. Filter /Waterpro
Valve box
381458
DISTRIBUTION
REPAIR PARTS
1591
< *>
$129.16*
186548
02/17/ra
$50.00
11I1LEMANN, DERRIE
REFTIND SWTMMIN(;
(;ENI ?RAI, PI) PRO
RECIISTRATION F
< *>
$50.00*
186549
02/17/98
$28.00
TILLRICH, CINDY
UNIFORM PANTS
020198
POOL, TRACK GRE
LAUNDRY
< *>
$28.00*
186550
02/17/98
$178.20
Ultimate Golf
GOLF BALLS
51270
PRO SHOP
COST OF AS -PR
1725
< *>
$178.20*
186551
02/17/98
$602.07
United Electric
Part
97811600
ST LIGHTING OR
GENERAL SUPPLI
1771
< *>
$602.07*
COUNCIL
CHECn - EGISTER
11 -.iB -1998 (18:49)
page 27
CHECK NO
DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
186552
02/17/98
$1,098.34
UNITED STORES
Clothes
123197
GENERAL MAINT
LAUNDRY
- - - - -- - ---
02/17/98
$388.57
UNITED STORES
Clothes
121197
EQUTPMENT OPER
LAUNDRY
1891
< *>
$1,486.91*
186553
02/17/98
$50.00
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
012698
GENERAL TURF C
CONF & SCHOOLS
< *>
$50.00*
.
186554
02/17/98
$50.00
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
012698
GENERAL TURF C
CONF & SCHOOLS
< *>
$50.00*
186555
02/17/98
$50.00
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
012698
GENERAL TURF C
CONF & SCHOOLS
< *>
$50.00*
186556
02/17/98
$1,077.00
URDAHL, CATHERINE NELSON
Freelance writing /edi
012898
PARK ADMIN.
PROF SERVICES
< *>
$1,077.00*
186557
02/17/98
$260.80
US WEST COMMUNICATIONS
Logis TI
D0869309
CENT SVC GENER
TELEPHONE
< *>
$260.80*
186558
02/17/98
$1,045.99
VAN PAPER CO.
Bags
200760
VERNON SELLING
PAPER SUPPLIES
1653
02/17/98
$1,007.22
VAN PAPER CO.
Bags
200764
YORK SELLING
PAPER SUPPLIES
1653
02/17/98
$653.22
VAN PAPER CO.
Bags
201015
50TH ST SELLIN
PAPER SUPPLIES
1653
02/17/98
$309.92
VAN PAPER CO.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
201160
CLUB HOUSE
GENERAL SUPPLI
1515
< *>
$3,016.35*
186559
02/17/98
$19.38
VIDEO DUPLICATION INC
TRAINING AIDS
118421
TRATNING
TRAINING AIDS
< *>
$19.38*
186560
02/17/98
$32.80
VIKING ELECTRIC
Broker
3427071
CENTENNIAL LAK
REPAIR PARTS
1276
02/17/98
$281.16
VIKING ELECTRIC
REPAIR PARTS
3471.246
MAINT OF LOURS
REPAIR PARTS
1571
< *>
$313.96*
186561
02/17/98
$71.00
VINTAGE ONE WINES
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
2222
50TH ST SELLIN
CST OF GD WINE
02/17/98
$530.00
VINTAGE ONE WINES
COST OF GOODS SOLD WI
2230
VERNON SELLING
CST OF GD WINE
< *>
$601.00*
186562
02/17/98
$296.82
Voss Lighting
Bulbs
20052760
GENERAL MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
02/17/98
$346.06
Voss Lighting
Parts
20110340
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
1674
02/17/98
$391.71
Voss Lighting
Art center supplies
20115850
ART CENTER BLD
GENERAL SUPPLI
1875
< *>
$1,034.59*
186563
02/17/98
$13,047.00
W. E. NELSON STUCCO CO
LATH & STUCCO ART CEN
020698
MEDIA LAB CONS
CTP
1239
< *>
$13,047.00*
186E+64
02/17/98
$3.16
WALSER FORD
Shop suppli,•!-.
60939
EQ111PMFNT OPFR
RFPAIR PARTS
1405
02/ 171111
$174.96
WALSER F0111
: ;11,)I) I,:iil!:
r.l•I .:'.
I:p(iIPMENT OPRIt
ACCh:a:ORIRt:
1622
*
$178.12*
1.86565
02/17/98
$100.00
WALSH, WILLIAM
POLICE SERVTCFS
0201)98
RFSFRVE PROC;RA
CONTR SERVTCKS
*>
$100.00*
186566
02/17/98
$68.37
West Group
GENERAL SUPPLIES
96686425
SUPFRV. & OVRH
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$68.37*
186567
02/17/98
$504.82
WEST WELD SUPPLY CO.
Supplies
012081
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR PARTS
1666
COUNCIL
CHEC.i, REGISTER
11 -kEB -1998
(18:49)
page 28
CHECK NO
. DATE
CHECK AMOUNT
VENDOR
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE
PROGRAM
OBJECT
PO NUM
----------------------=---------------
186567
02/17/98
$84.87
-------- - - - - --
WEST WELD SUPPLY
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CO.
Parts
12153
EQUIPMENT OPER
WELDING SUPPLI
9535
02/17/98
$149.16
WEST WELD SUPPLY
CO.
Supplies
12236
EQUIPMENT OPER
REPAIR
PARTS
1784
< *>
$738.85*
186568
02/17/98
$20.18
WESTBURNE SUPPLY
INC
GENERAL
SUPPLIES
2567829
BUILDING MAINT
GENERAL SUPPLI
< *>
$20.18*
186569
02/17/98
$1,560.00
WESTCOTT COMMUNICATIONS
Subscription
878018
ADMINISTRATION
DUES
K
SURSCRI
< *>
$1,560.00*
1865'70
02/17/98
$49.64
WILSON SPORTING GOODS
CO
COST
OF
GOODS
PRO
S
1673052
PRO SHOP
COST OF
GDS PR
1161
< *>
$49.64*
186571
02/17/98
-$18.51
WINE COMPANY, TIIE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
W1
541
50'1.11 ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD WINE
02/17/98
$70.18
WINE COMPANY, THE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
660
50TH 5'r SELLIN
CST
OF
GD WINE
02/17/98
$496.89
WINE COMPANY, THE
COST
OF
GOODS
SO1,D
WI
661
50TH ST SELLIN'CST
OF
GD WINE
02/17/98
$811.84
WINE COMPANY, THE
COST -OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
914
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD WINE
02/17/98
$852.63
WINE COMPANY, THE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
915,
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD WINE
02/17/98
$471.48
WINE COMPANY, THE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
916
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD WINE
02/17/98
$180.80
WINE COMPANY, THE
COST
OF•GOODS
SOLD
MI
918
5011 ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GDS MIX
02/17/98
$120.95
WINE COMPANY, THE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
998
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD WINE
02/17/98
$1,472.41
WINE COMPANY, THE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
1193
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD WINE
02/17/98
$547,-.92
WINE COMPANY, THE
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
1195
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD WINE
02/17/98
$944.89
WINE COMPANY, THE
COST.OF
GOODS
SOLD
WT
1.1-96.
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD WINE
< *>
$5,951.48*
186572
02/17/98
$467.00
WINE MERCHANTS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
22212
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD WINE
02/17/98
$237.00
WINE MERCHANTS
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
22213
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD WINE
< *>
$704.00*
186573
02/17/98
$481.00
WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
6401.8
GOLF DOME
COST OF GD SOL
1513
< *>
$481.00*
186574
02/17/98
$50.95
WM H MCCOY
Kerosene
39040
MAINT OF LOURS
GASOLINE
1574
< *>
$50.95*
186575
02/17/98
$75.00
Wolfe, Kay
Art work for
recyclin
012998
COMMUNICATIONS
PRINTING
< *>
$75.00*
186576
02/17/98
$839.60
WOOLDRIDGE, MARY
PGA SHOW REIMBURSMENT
020598
PRO SHOP
MEETING EXPENS-
<*>
$839.60*
186577
02/17/98
$463.72
WORLD CLASS WINES
INC
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
68353
50TI1 ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD WINE
02/17/98
$664.25
WORLD CLASS WINES
INC
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
68354
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD WINE
02/17/98
$379.00
WORLD CLASS WINES
INC
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
68504.
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD WINE
02/17/98
$533.57
WORLD CLASS WINES
INC.
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
68505
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD WINE
02/17/98
$60.00
WORLD CLASS WINES
INC
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
68518
VERNON SELLING
CST
OF
GD WINE
02/17/98
$600.21
WORLD CLASS WINES
INC
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
68674
50TH ST SELLIN
CST
OF
GD WINE
02/17/98
$1,537.71
WORLD CLASS WINES
INC
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
68676
YORK SELLING
CST
OF
GD WINE
02/17/gR
$281.19
WORLD CLASS WTNES
INC
COST
OF
GOODS
SOLD
WI
�Rr.79
VERNON SELLTNG
CST
OF
GD, WINE
< *>
$4,519.65*
186578
02/17/98
$100.00
WROBLESK.I, HENRY
POLICE SERVICES
020998
RESERVE PROGRA
CONTR
SERVICES
< *>
$100.00*
•COUNCIL CHE. SGISTER 1_ -�B -1998 (18:49)
page 29
CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR
- - - -- DESCRIPTION- INVOICE- PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM
-------------------------- ----- - - - - -- ------------------------------
186579 02/17/98 $717.85 XEROX CORPORATION Maint 60754045 CENT SVC GENER EQUIP RENTAL
< *> $717.85* 4
186580 02/17/98 $220.46 ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS INC BRUSH 62756 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI 2149
< *> $220.46*
$511,187.02*
,'01INC I I. CHECK f:11MMARY L l Pl ft 19911 1
-- -------------
FUND
#
10
----- --- - -- -----------------------------
GENERAL FUND
$210,663.03
FUND
#
12
COMMUNICATIONS
$1,296.00
FUND
#
15
WORKING CAPITAL
$34,310.53
FUND
#
23
ART CENTER
$2,349.00
FUND
#
25
GOLF DOME FUND
$9,034.11
FUND
#
26
SWIMMING POOL FUND
$5,310.67
FUND
#
27
GOLF COURSE FUND
$6,436.45
FUND
#
28
ICE ARENA FUND
$16,560.69
FUND
#
30
EDINBOROUGH /CENTENNIAL LAK
$17,045.47
FUND
#
40
UTILITY FUND
$9,929.56
FUND
#
41
STORM SEWER UTILITY FUND
$4,972.00
FUND
#
42
RECYCLING PROGRAM
$3,060.00
FUND
#
50
LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND
$185,044.51
FUND
#
60
CONSTRUCTION FUND
$81.00
FUND
#
61
PARK BOND FUND
$5,069.77
FUND
#
73
I -494 COMMISSION
$24.23
$511,187.02*
NEW STATE -AID EDINA EDINA
NEW STATE -AID BLOOMINGTON BLOOMINGTON
---- m °---°
LIBERTY PROPERTY TRUST /DIVERSIFIED PNAR. SER'
--- ------ - ----- CURRENTLY BLOOMINGTON OWNED
SIGNAL 6 INTERSECTION GEOMETRIC
RECONSTRUCTION COST SPLIT
W. 78TH STREET CORRIDOR COST SPLITS