Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
1998-05-04_COUNCIL PACKET
AGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL MAY 4,1998 7:00 P.M. ROT.T.CAT.T. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Commissioner, Council Member or citizen so requests it. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the Agenda. I. Rollcall II. III. I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of HRA - Regular Meeting of April 20,1998 PAYMENT OF CLAIMS as per pre -list dated 4/29/98 TOTAL: $4,299.66 ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of April 20, 1998 and Board of Review Meeting of April 20,1998 II. PUBLIC HEARINGS ON VACATIONS OF STREET OR UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENTS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Engineer. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. If Council wishes to proceed, action by Resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall of Council members required to pass. Rollcall A VACATION OF PUBLIC DRAINAGE/ UTILITY EASEMENT- Robert Winder, 6533 Parnell Avenue III. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS - Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Planner. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. Zoning Ordinances: First and Second Reading require 4/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of Council to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: 4/5 favorable rollcall of all members of Council to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. Conditional Use Permit: 3/5 favorable rollcall vote required to pass. Rollcall A. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND VACATION OF A PORTION OF WEST 69TH STREET for Christ Presbyterian Church, 6901 Normandale Road, Building and Parking Lot Expansion, Generally Located North of West 70th Street and East of Highway 100 ,lcall B. FINAL PLAT Coventry at Centennial Lakes Ninth Addition C. LOT DIVISION JMS Equities, 4908 -4910 Malibu Drive D. LOT DIVISION William and Margaret Joas, 6612 and 6608 Parkwood Road Agenda/Edina City Council May 4,1998 Page 2 * E. SET HEARING DATE (5/18/98) Final Rezoning and Final Plat Approval, Namron Company, 51XX Lincoln Drive IV. ORDINANCES First Reading Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second Reading: Favorable rollcall vote of majority of all Council members to pass. A. FIRST READING ORDINANCE NO. 1998-4 An Ordinance Amending Section 460 - Signs. V. AWARD OF BID * A. Traffic Actuated Control System, W 76th Street, Imp TS -24 * B. Irrigation System, W 66th Street between France & York Avenues Imp. WM -385 * C. Aquatic Weed Treatment VI. RECOMMENDATIONS AND REPORTS * A. Signal Easement Authorization - York Avenue at Cub Liquor Store Entrance * B. Wooddale Park Comfort Station C. Baseball Scoreboards with Advertising, Courtney Ballfield, Braemar Park * D. Termination of Traffic Agreement Centennial Lakes * E Approve Teamsters Local 320 (Patrol Officers) Contract * F. Public Works Open House May 16,1998 9:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. VII. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS VIII. CONCERNS OF RESIDENTS IX. INTERGOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES X. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF MAYOR AND COUNCIL XI. MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEM XII. FINANCE Rollcall A. Payment of Claims as per Pre -List dated 4/30/98 TOTAL: $889,882.52 SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS Thur May 14 Council Work Session 6:30 P.M. CENTENNIAL LAKES Mon May 18 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mon May 19 SPECIAL ELECTION SD 273 REFERENDA Mon May 25 MEMORIAL DAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed' Mon Jun 1 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mon Jun 15 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Fri Jul 3 INDEPENDENCE DAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed Mon Jul 6 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mon July 20 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS City of Edina RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the following described property is at present a single tract of land: Lot 1, Block 1, LANDMARK, ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota, and WHEREAS, the owners have requested the subdivision of said tract into separate parcels (herein called "Parcels ") described as follows: PARCEL A: That part of Lot 1, Block 1, LANDMARK ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota, according to the recorded plat thereof lying northerly of a line which bears North 53 degrees 38 minutes 06 seconds East, assumed bearing, from a point on the west line of said lot distant 28.05 feet north of the southwest corner of said lot. For purposes of this description the west lot line bears South 2 degrees 25 minutes 13 seconds East. PARCEL B: That part of Lot 1, Block 1, LANDMARK ADDITION, Hennepin County Minnesota, according to the recorded plat thereof lying southerly of a line which bears North 53 degrees 38 minutes 06 seconds East, assumed bearing, from a point on the west line of said lot distant 28.05 feet north of the southwest corner of said lot. For purposes of this description the west lot line bears South 2 degrees 25 minutes 13 seconds East. WHEREAS, the requested, subdivision is authorized under Code Section 810 and it has been determined that compliance with the. Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purpose of the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Code Sections 810 and 850; NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of the separate above described Parcels as separate tracts of land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Code Sections 850 and 810 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but only to the extent .permitted under Code Section 810 and Code Section 850 subject to the limitations set out in Code Section 850 and said Ordinances are not waived for any other,purpose or as to any other provisions thereof, and further subject, however, to the provision 'that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances. ADOPTED this 4th day of May, 1998. City Hall (612) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 826 -0379 - STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting May 4, 1998, and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this 13`h day of April, 1999. w9tNA �r'� o e 0 • ���bRPOM�F"� City of Edina RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR THE COVENTRY AT CENTENNIAL LAKES 9TH ADDITION: BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled, "THE COVENTRY AT CENTENNIAL LAKES 9TH ADDITION ", platted by Centennial Land Partnership, a Minnesota limited partnership, an undivided 91.43% interest, and John W. Hedberg, an undivided 8.57% interest, and the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota, public body corporate and politic under the laws of the State of Minnesota, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council on May 4,1998, be and is hereby granted final plat approval Adopted this 411, day of May, 1998. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing City Council Minutes is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of May 4, 1998, and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this 8th day of July, 1998. rl` 0-A - Debra A. Mangen; City 42lerk City Hall (612) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 927 -7645 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 927 -5461 o e 0 o• ,�roRroPA � RESOLUTION APPROVING FINAL PLAT FOR THE OAKS LINCOLN TOWNHOMES City of Edina BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, that that certain plat entitled, "OAKS LINCOLN TOWNHOMES ", platted by Namron Company, LLC, a Limited Liability Company, and presented at the regular meeting of the City Council on May 18,1998, be and is hereby granted final plat approval. Passed this 18th day of May, 1998. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing City Council Minutes is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its regular meeting of May 18,1998, and as recorded in the Minutes of said regular meeting. WITNESS, my hand and seal of said City this 6th day of July, 1998. Debra A. Mangen, City lerk City Hall (612) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 927 -7645 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 927 -5461 t1e11 tt1r � CHr Ora lilt Elm" i- fa11 01,1 ,ems ,t" 1011 $us tw Q flit il. i rty � ra, out 619► grips i i u My , rot► 1 1&1' * la �2kr out rr+d�oy a�rpar ► W04 b u 11/oe � KIW _ Lilt flu Ott/ N/` f?ll wit Onr 0010 tlw r — I :lit - I tl� c�u�tr �fttr Ma[, out rrtr ittr Iltr oitr rut IM . dP la► °11 Iii[► (ur cu► Ior wit Wit tu ,nu er ►1 atr � tat ► Ott ►� � � / CHO oat► tiM et► 0/r net I cl[r / lur % �� / 3 la[► 1!L fit► ! am 8 iur I list Ilw our lift 00Lr fl:r 1 !I ftlw eat. Li n \ \y � ! clip clM fits row � 61119 111 up 9Uf /. Ica 1 MM [lp t1M If! 1►* 1 a - MOM 1q! till Iam ran aon rats 000 WSP a S (NI I PIP 1011 � Nn Ian (IM ` ! 001 ,ty, M IlM ays� Nu f1d.1 s1� am ago k 9M Ito 6M Its w11 Iml 91c+ SM SM 0111 / /, to 1110110 / tam ►i91 tb ills dft � Oil• t i,1 „f/ / 1111 (In son C IDl1 Y MM (li1 01, faM • Wild HI1 0!110 10! gall, n* v 1110 lot rim —� ►a11 cnn am 6010 I Oi>t a a 1111 n11 1119 T—� SOfs 1001 roll L��l10� MAY -11 -98 04:18 PM FAUST 612 936 2189 P.02 Woodhill -Edina Association 5/4198 i Q CPC Proposed Campus Expansion Edina City Council Meeting May 4,1998 ® 7:00pm Presenter for those opposed: Stephen Brown - 6624 Southcrest Drive 2 Q CPC Proposed Expansion Who is Steve Brown? • A representative for concerned neighbors • A resident of Edina for my entire life • A father of 2 beautiful little girls • Commercial Real Estate Exec for 13 years • An advocate of "win -win" compromise 3 0 Agenda • Introduction • Brief Neighborhood History • Factual Review • Traffic and Safety Concerns • Summary 8 Proposal 4 Q Introduction What are we here to discuss tonight? • Not the merits of CPC • Not the benefit of their programs • Not that CPC is an asset to the community • Not the importance of religious institutions 5 Q Introduction So, what'ARE we here to discuss tonight? • A land use issuo, not a religious Issue • Adhorence to the comprehensive plan • Impacts of continued growth • Alternative options • Real compromise, not a "red herring" 6 Q Neighborhood History • 1957 - Residential lots purchased for first sanctuary • 1968 - Sanctuary expanded to current capacity • 1973 - Undeveloped residential lots donated to CPC • 1978 - f=irst attempt by CPC to create parking lot north of West 69th. CPC withdrew due to strong neighborhood opposition. 7 0 Neighborhood History • 1981 - State Hwy. 100 re- construction. Normandalo Rd. becomes one way. West 691h becomes a primary access street into neighborhood, - Historical Fact 8 Q Neighborhood History • 1989 - CPC adds 29,000 sf expansion to existing campus • May 19, 1989 - "We feel that the impact of this project will be fairly minimal to the neighborhood in general." CPC Church Expansion 1 MAY -11 -99 04:18 PM FAUST 612 936 21e9 P.03 ' Woodhill -Edina Association 514/98 - Letter to neighbors of CPC from Virgil Leih, CPC Minister 9 0 Neighborhood History (29.000 sf expansion cont.) • June 6, 1989 -'It is certainly not our desire to increase membership to a point that it would be a detriment to the neighborhood' -Letter to CPC neighbors and friends from Bill & Sally Hall, CPC Building Committee Co- chairs 10 0 Neighborhood History (29,000 sf expansion cont.) July 24, 1989 - Expansion approved subject to conditions. 11 Q Neighborhood History • July 5, 1989 - "The church has been Informed by the city that the lots are to be residential, and must be developed as residential." -Bill Seger of the CPC building committee at Edina City Planning Meeting regarding lots north of 69th Street 12 Neighborhood History • July 24, 1989 -'The church acknowledged that it was not a good idea and was insensitive to the neighbors. This property is held for investment and the church would consider selling it if they obtained a good offer." -Bill Hall, of CPC Building Committee at July City Council Meeting referring to CPC's plans for northern lots that had been proposed to be parking lot In 1978. 13 [] Neighborhood History • 1991 - The church applied for a conditional use permit for the construction of parking on the vacant land north of West 69th Street. • It was denied by the City with the following comments: 14 0 Neighborhood History • "...this proposal disturbs me. I remember very clearly that two years ago when CPC requested a conditional use permit to remodel their existing facility, they indicated at that time they would not cross 69th St." - Former Commissioner Nan Faust 15 0 Neighborhood History • "This is,; residential neighborhood and the church has not investigated all alternatives that were to be implemented with their previous proposal, The growth of a church should not 'swallow' a neighborhood and if the church Is experiencing such growth, maybe they should consider relocating." - Commissioner Holon McCelland 16 0 Neighborhood History CPC Horne Acquisitions: • November'94 - 6821 Normandaie Rd • January'97 - 6820 Brittany Rd • March '97.6824 Brittany Rd • April '98.6816 Brittany Rd 17 (] Neighborhood History • Total invested in first 3 homes: $598,500 CPC Church Expansion 2 MAY -11 -90 04:19 PM Woodhill -Edina Association FAUST • Market Value of 6816 Brittany $180,000 • Minimum total Investment; $778,500 612 936 2189 Not until April '97 did CPC make any contact with neighbors about plans 18 Q Factual Review - MEMBERSHIP 19 0 Factual Review - CPC AVERAGE ANNUAL ATTENDENCE 2091 Factual Review - CPC Average Sunday Attendance 21 0 Factual Review • Acreage 6.8 to 9.2 - -- 35% Increase • Building Area: - Pre 1989 39,912 sf — Current 71,124 sf - Proposed 131,084 sf 220 Factual Review - Building Area • Pre 1989 39,912 (Square Footage) • Current 71,124 • Proposed 131,084 (Phase 1 & 2) 23 Q Factual Review - CPC Membership • 54% ... Edina 090%... 5 mile radius • 55435 Zip Code ... ONLY 5% 24 Q Traffic & Safety - Neighborhood Facts • Park access must cross 66th or 70th • Streets are our sidewalks • Kids play in the streots • Hilly terrain affects visibility • Cornelia School traffic committee formed 25 Q Traffic & Safety- Neighborhood Facts • We have experienced change already • It will continue without any change at CPC 26 0 Traffic & Safety - West 70th St Avg. Daily Traffic: • 1986 - 12,100 cars • 1997.21,500 cars • 66% increase in just 9 years 27 Q Traffic & Safety Surrounding Commercial Property: • Industrial - approx. 900,000 sf • Retail - approx 2,700,000 sf • Office - approx. 3,500,000 sf With well over 1,000.000 sf planned or under construction 28 0 Traffic & Safety P.04 5/4/98 aS V- - At-f 11 T`J: -- A ........ C /A /A4 • Problem will only increase • C PC adds to problem • While CPC not primary reason, why should we exacerbate problem • Let's look at the anticipated increases ... 29 Q Traffic & Safety - Traffic Study Out to Brittany: Currently ® 6ri;j- Projected ® 100 Increase of 61% In from Brittany: Currently 0 8I Projected a 35 Increase of 57% 3o Q Traffic & Safoty Out to Dunberry: Currently ® 83 Projected ® 134 Increase of 61% In from Dunberry: Currently ® 27 Projected ® 38 Increase of 41% 310 Traffic & Safety In 70th from west: Currently 0 441 Projectod 0 683 Increase of 55% Out 70th to west: Currently ® 375 Projected ® 595 Increase of 59% 32 Q Traffic & Safety In 70th from east: Currently ® 80 Projected rte? 127 Increase of 59% Out 70th to east: Currently ® 147 Projected ® 204 Incroaso of 39% 33 0 Summary - Proposal #5 is not • Consistent with Comprehensive Plan • Consistent with 'Growing Small' • In the best interests of our neighborhood • A Win -Win proposition!! • A Compromise 34 O Summary - Why not? • Physical Structure unchanged • Still relocating West 691h to the north • Still demolishing 3 existing homes CPC Church Expansion 4 MAY -11 -98 04:20 PM Woodhill -Edina Association FAUST 612 936 2189 • Still demolishing extensive greenspace for parking lot • Still no assurances that this Is the endl 35 0 Summary, `Compromise" 1 a: settlement of differences by arbitration or by consent reached by mutual concessions 1b: something blending qualities of two different things 2a: to bind by mutual agreement 2b: to adjust or settle by mutual concessions 2c: to come to agreement by mutual concession 36 Q Our Proposal • West 69th Street stays in current location • Allow expansion only on existing site • No church parking on West 70th anytime • No church parking on Wast 69th, Dunberry, Brittany or Normandale except on Sundays 37 Q Our Proposal • Sell homes & lots north of 69th prior to construction on existing site • Restrictive covenants on all homos & lots north of 69th as single family for 40 yrs • Landscaping & lighting as proposed • Curb cuts as recommended by Planning 38 Q Summary • We ask the City Council to: • Be visionary, anticipate long tonn impact • Use common sense about safety risks • Put an end to this issue for good • Make CPC explore other solutions • Vote ` Ton Option #5 P.05 514198 CPC Church Expansion 5 -- �QQ -Mm \\ / INFORMATION BOOKLET FOR PROPOSED EXPANSION OF CHRIST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH Christ Presbyterian Church CCPC ") has applied for a conditional use permit to expand and improve its facility at the corner of Highway 100 and 70th Street. This booklet provides background information relating to CPC's facility needs and the changes proposed, its decision - making process, its role in the Edina commmunity and surrounding metropolitan area, and its communication with its neighbors. In 1989, CPC remodeled and updated its facility to meet code requirements and provide appropriate toddler and nursery facilities. It also added a multi - purpose room, counseling and administrative offices and a chapel. Since then, CPC has experienced a surge in worship attendance and numbers of youth and children involved in its programs. (See Tab 1.) CPC's application comes after years of internal discussions and study of eight options for handling CPC's growth. (See Tab 2.) It also follows the implementation of numerous logistical and programming changes made in an effort to maximize the use of our current facilities. (See Tab 3.) In January 1997, the church's elected governing body, the Session, unanimously voted to undertake a capital campaign for a proposed expansion of CPC's facilities. This decision focused on how CPC's facility hinders its fulfillment of its mission statement. (See Tab 4.) Edina residents make up 54% of CPC's membership. These Edina residents and other CPC members have moved through the planning process with CPC's leadership. They have, individually and in groups, prayed over CPC's decision - making process. Members have given generously of their time and resources. In January 1998, the congregation felt strongly enough about the current facility need and the process CPC has followed that 78% of the attending members (at perhaps the largest CPC congregational meeting ever held) voted to pursue the proposed expansion at this time, even if it requires CPC to incur additional debt of up to $3 million dollars. Christ Presbyterian Church has been a Woodhill neighbor since 1957 — for over 40 years. Like the neighborhood surrounding it, CPC's site has changed over the years. (See Tab 5.) Site changes have been necessitated by CPC's growing role in and service to Edina and the greater metropolitan area. CPC is meeting the spiritual, physical and emotional needs of increasing numbers of residents, providing uplifting activities for member and non - member youths, and cultivating leadership and dedication to service in its attendees. It further serves our area by providing meeting space and programs to fill the growing social needs left by government funding cuts. (See Tab 6.) CPC has made a sincere effort to communicate with its surrounding neighbors about our planning process. It has sought to inform and to listen to and respond to the concerns of its neighbors. (See Tab 7.) It has also tried to inform its own members of the neighbors' concerns. (See Tab 8.) Unfortunately, some of our neighbors' opposition has been sought based on misleading or outdated information. (See Tab 9.) CPC continues to try to set forth accurate information regarding its proposal for its neighbors' consideration. (See Tab 10.) Aside from some neighbors' insistence that CPC should change its ministry mission, cap its membership or move out of Edina, CPC has tried to implement input from its neighbors in its revised final design aftematives. (See Tabs 11 -14.) Christ Presbyterian Church is a vital, growing community of faith. It is deeply committed to serving God and being of service to people throughout Edina, throughout the region and around the globe. While CPC's overall commitment is to a global community, Edina has always been CPC's primary community of service. While CPC strives to be faithful to its mission statement, it is also concerned about its surrounding neighbors. CPC has worked long and hard at developing site design alternatives that will equip it to maximize its ministry impact while minimizing any possible impact on our Woodhill neighborhood. February, 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS Document Description Tab CPC's Growth: 1990 -1998 CPC's Internal Decision - Making Process 2 Eight Long -Range Planning Options (Fall 1995) 2 Report for Session: Maximizing Facility Usage (January 1996) 3 Summary of Facility Impact on Fulfillment of Mission Statement 4 Letter to Congregation Regarding Session's Decision to Pursue Expansion 4 History of Previous Land Acquisitions, Land Sales, and Building Expansions 5 Examples of Non -CPC Groups Currently Utilizing CPC's Facilities 6 Examples of Community Support Groups Led by CPC Members 6 Examples of CPC's On -Going Service Projects in the Metro -Area 6 Summary of CPC's Communication with Its Neighbors 7 CPC's Letter to Neighbors Regarding Decision to Pursue Expansion (1/28/97) 7 CPC's Letter to Neighbors Regarding Neighbors' Concerns (5/13/97) 7 Letter from Neighbors Glenn and Connie Ray Regarding Their Concerns 7 Letter from Polly Bowles Responding to Rays' Letter 7 CPC's Letter to Congregation Regarding Neighbors' Concerns 8 Woodhill Association Notice of 6/23/97 Meeting with Its Proposed Expansion 9 Overview and Preliminary Resolution of Opposition to be Presented at that Meeting CPC's Response to Neighborhood Presented Proposed Expansion 10 Overview and Board of Directors' Resolution of 6/23/97 Selected Edina Church Comparisons 11 Comparison of CPC's Existing Facility, the Preliminary April 1997 Master Plan, 12 and the Four January 1998 Master Plan Options 1998 CPC Proposed Master Plan 13 Traffic Study Report OV9 14 N M � T REVN4l� DO M CO R5 F RS AN MBE A Notes CPC'S GROWTH: 1990 -1998 * Worship Attendance: Approximately 6.25% annual growth in attendance, from 38,500 /year to 62,000 /year. Sunday morning attendance ranges from 1000 in the summer to 1600 for special events, averaging 1250. * Membership: Up from 1,700 to 3,000 (includes adults and youth who have been confirmed or have joined through a new member's class). 54% of members are Edina residents 90% of members live within a 5 -mile radius of CPC's site Youth Education : (6th -12th grade) Youth Group attendance has roughly tripled to: 350 on Wednesday evenings 120 on Sunday mornings 70 for Sunday evening local mission service projects 71% of CPC's attending youth are Edina residents * Children's Education : (Birth to 5th grade) Up from one class per grade to four classes per grade. Average attendance: 600 on Sunday mornings 150+ on Wednesday evenings 59% of CPC's attending children are Edina residents * Growth from within Edina: Percentage of new members joining during this period who live in Edina has held steady between 45 -55% depending on the actual make up of each new members' class. CPC continues to attract its greatest percentage of members from its home community. * Number of Neighbors Involved in CPC Programs: CPC records indicate over 400 neighbors living east of Highway 100 and within a perimeter area 6 blocks north, east, and south of CPC have recently been involved in a program conducted by CPC or otherwise directly benefited from its services. —1— I Notes CPC's INTERNAL DECISION - MAKING PROCESS * 1993 -1995. The Session (our elected, congregation governing body) studied eight long -range planning options for handling CPC's growth and space limitations. Summaries of the options, as drafted in 1995 for congregational discussion, follow this page. In December 1995, the Session decided that CPC should stay at its current site and implement Option F- Maximizing Present Facility Use With Creative Programming. (The report of the Maximizing Committee follows at Tab 3.) It also authorized the formation of a steering committee to consider whether or not CPC would need to expand after facility maximizing steps were taken. (A summary of the Steering Committee's evaluation of how CPC's facilities hinder its fulfillment of its mission statement follows at Tab 4.) * 1996. The Steering Committee was formed and undertook a process of prayer, study and congregational input regarding what facility changes might be needed to equip CPC to do the ministries to which it is called. * January 1997- July 1997. CPC's elected Session unanimously adopted the Steering Committee's unanimous recommendation that CPC undertake a capital campaign for the purpose of expanding CPC's facilities. Communications were sent and meetings were held with members and neighbors to inform them of our process and seek their input. (See Tab 7 - Summary of CPC's Communication with Its Neighbors.) The first stage of the capital campaign was completed with initial pledges totalling $5.4 million. * July 1997 - December 1997. CPC worked hard internally during this time to develop design alternatives that would provide CPC with facilities that meet its needs, address the concerns of our surrounding neighbors, and are financially feasible. CPC's leadership continued to touchbase with the Woodhill -Edina Association leadership to discuss our probable timeframe for further neighborhood meetings. In December, Session voted (26 to 1) to endorse incurring up to $3 million in additional debt to complete Phase I as early as possible. * January 1998 - February 1998. CPC's congregation voted (by 78 %) not only to pursue building the proposed expansion as early as possible, but to incur up to $3 million to do so. CPC and the Woodhill -Edina Association Board, at CPC's request, scheduled a second round of neighborhood meetings to discuss CPC's design alternatives prior to submitting to the City of Edina. CPC also met individually with neighbors immediately adjacent to the proposed parking lot to discuss the design alternatives and consider any personal concerns they might have. -2- V y11 b . it$ wuyG . 1 41111 / uy vN 6 6 vuJ % A a / i 177] / OPTION A -NO ACTION AT THIS TIME DESCRIPTION: The Session determines that it will take no action at this time in the area of facilities. The staff end program leaders are encouraged to continue as they have been. This could also be the "default" option if no --cision is made or the entire issue is tabled for an indefinite period of time. ADVANTAGES: Allows for stability and less change. No financial costs. Takes no church "energy ". PROBABLE/PROJECTED OUTCOMES: PEOPLE - -CPC will probably continue to attract people, however, we will become the "ove :1flowing barrel" — already filled to the brim, so anything added means that others are splashing out the sides for lack of space in the barrel. Basically, this would stop any numerical growth and significant financial growth. CONINIUNITY —This option could increase the possibility of building community with the people who are already here --IF efforts are made to build that community. The difficulty in planning programs and events would be finding space if they were on a Sunday or Wednesday, gathering large numbers together in limited large space, and/or appropriate facilities to meet program designs. DISCIPLESHIP — Similar to community outcomes, this could allow emphasis on discipleship building, however, possibly limit options because of space. FACILITIES - -No changes (or minimal changes) to present facilities. LONG RANGE —How would this effect evangelism? momentum? volunteer and staff frustrations with space? OPTION B- CHURCH PLANTING DESCRIPTION — Sending a group of CPC members (200 ?) to a new location to begin a separate, sister church. CPC would probably help with initial financing and leadership development and possibly staffing. New church would probably be in the outer most ring of suburbs. ADVANi TAGES— Church development in a new community. Excitement for beginning a new church. Sister church relationship. Helping to build the metro church community. PROBABLE/PROJECTED OUTCOMES: :OPLE —This would send 200 people to the new church and possibly attract people from the area of the new location who otherwise might come to CPC. [Note: Studies have found that large congregations who send out a ;roue of people, have those spaces vacated in their own church refilled within 6 months. Filled, however, with new people.] C 31VIvM`NITY- Allows for another, smaller community to form -- perhaps for people who would like the feel of CPC vothout the large numbers. ISCIPLESHIP- -The new church would probably include some of CPC "core" people in the leadership roles there. :New leaders would need to come forward and be developed at CPC. FACILITIES—No change in current facilities. LONG RANGE- -The planted church could grow and flourish. If we choose this option as a solution to our growth issues, we would need to continue to plant new churches, even at the -rate of one a year. -3- OPTION C- SATELLITE CHURCH DESCRIPTION: This would be another building, in another location, but more directly related to CPC. The two facilities would share staff, communication, finances, etc. It would essentially be a second site, owned and operated by CPC. Northern Heights Lutheran has this arrangement. ADVANTAGES: Allows us to expand without changing 70th and 100 location. Could allow shorter commutes for people nearer to the satellite church. Depending on the satellite facility, could increase program options. Could bring cultural diversity, depending on location of satellite location. PROBABLE/PROJECTED OUTCOMES: PEOPLE —Would allow for choice of location. Choices would depend a lot on what programs/senices were available at each location. How staff would be involved in both locations would need to be determined. It would allow for more people with another facility. COMMUNITY -It could help community if people became more involved at one of the locations. It could hinder community if people traded off between the 2 locations due to choices they make regarding program. This could make the feeling of community even more difficult. -DISCIPLESHIP —This option would not directly effect discipleship, except in relation to the availability of space for programming. . FACILITIES —The purchase and maintenance of a second facility will be a significant increase in costs. Also the coordination between 2 facilities. LONG RANGE- -Would this second facility and the coordination. between two sites work? Would the second facility be expandable if we continue to grow. OPTION D -HOME CHURCHES DESCRIPTION: The congregation would be divided into home church groups. Groups would meet for worship and fellowship. Home church groups would be scheduled to attend worship at CPC every other week or once a month and then meet toeether on the alternate Sundays. This is the model used in the mesa size churches in Korea. ADVANTAGES: Cost effective. Enhance small communities. Allows almost unlimited growth. Develops strong lay leadership. PROBABLLTROJECTED OUTCOMES: PEOPLE —The number of people worshipping at CPC would be regulated by the number of home church groups scheduled on a given Sunday. Growth could continue in great numbers by starting new home churches. COMMUNITY -The home churches would enhance community as people are involved more deeply with a smaller group. New members would be quickly integrated into a home church group. Some members may not be in the same home church group as friends, which could mean they don't have a chance to see them. DISCIPLESHIP —The smaller group setting could enhance growth as there would be more accountability, home church groups could really gear their time to where their groups needs are greatest. FACILITIES - -No change of CPC facilities, but we would need sufficient numbers of people willing to open their homes to a home church group. It would solve Sunday morning space crunch, but changes in Wed. evening would have to be determined. LONG RANGE —How would this affect other programs? Will this model work in USA? -4- VY 1141AN L -1 "L' 1V 1 11LJ Vt'r 311 L DESCRIPTION: Rent faciiities near CPC for programs. For example, Cornelia School, Radisson for larger services (Christmas and Easter), Evangelical Free Church across interchange. Arneson Acres. etc. ADVANTAGES: Could expand available space and options with as needed expenditures. Quite a bit would depend on what facilities we rented and when. PROBABLE/PROJECTED OUTCOMES: PEOPLE - -Would allow for more space, but could be problematic if families were split between multiple locations. Would mean volunteers and staff hauling materials, supplies, etc. to other locations. COMMUNITY -With people at multiple locations, it could make community more difficult. However, renting a facility for special worship times would allow for more of the congregation to worship together at those times. DISCIPLESHIP —Could allow for more classes and programs because of other space options. FACILITIES -- Present facility would remain the same. Costs would increase in regards to rent and possibly transportation (ie. buses between locations). Problems could arise if certain facilities were not available at times we would like to use them and/or the rental fees were prohibitive. LONG RANGE- -Could we do this lone term? How taxing would it be on leadership? OPTION F— MAXIMIZE PRESENT FACILITY USE `VITH CREATIVE PROGRAMMING JESCRIPTION: Leave facilities at 70th and 100 essentially the same, but increase the number of worship services (possibly Sat. night), increase Sunday School opportunities, split off sections of %Ved. night programming to other nights of the week (ie. Adults on Monday, Children on Wed., Youth on Thurs.), and maximize usage. This could also be combined with option E of renting other facilities. Menlo Park Presbyterian Church in California has chosen this option and is now doing 5 services and Sunday Schools (2 Sat. night and 3 on Sunday). ADVANTAGES: No new building or other sites needed. Stewardship of using what we have to the maximum. PROBABLE/PROJECTED OUTCOMES: PEOPLE - -By increasing the number of services, more people could come to worship which would allow for continued growth. [Note: Studies have shown that Saturday evening services do not tend to help crowding issues i Sunday mornings.] Personnel would need to be increased. COIANILTINITY- -There could be more difficulty in seeing the people you know if there were more options. Communitv alternatives would need to be developed. DISCIPLESHIP —As in other options, this would depend on programming. Other service options could mean other Adult Ed. options as well. 'ACILITIES --Incr eased wear and tear on present facility. Maintenance costs would be increased. LONG RANGE —Would allow us to strengthen areas other than facilities(ie. programs, missions, personnel, etc.) Is this a Iona range option? What would be our maximum at maximizing? -5- OPTION G —BUILD AT 70TH AND 100 DESCRIPTION: The architectural study that the Session had done suggested two options for building on this site. One plan enlarged the present sanctuary, the second suggested a new sanctuary with additional education space below. If we build new sanctuary space, we would have to build new education space. A realistic cost expectation, including structure, property acquisition, and increased parking is 6 million dollars. ADVANTAGES. Solves overcrowding. Provides space for new people to attend and be involved. Improves quality of worship (over Fireside overflow). Increased financial growth. Welcoming environment. PROBABLE/PROJECTED OUTCOMES: PEOPLE - -This would allow for more people to come and more programs to develop. COIvflvM7NITY - -A larger sanctuary could mean fewer services, which could increase the chance of seeing those familiar faces. However, as the numbers grow, the efforts to build community must also grow. If a larger entrance/fover /coffee area were included, it would be helpful. DISCIPLESHIP -- Increased space would provide for more program options. FACILITIES- -This would require a major building campaign. There would also be a construction period to deal with where some present facilities were affected. LONG RANGE -- Depending on exactly what was built, this would provide for the continued expansion. But the Iona range question -- "How big will we Ro ?" still looms. 'Alhat if we outgrow that new facility in another 10 year " OPTION H -BUILD AT ANOTHER SITE DESCRIPTION: Vacate the present location and build (or buy or buy and renovate) at another location. Costs are unknown because they would depend on what we did and where. ADVANTAGES: We could develop the exact facilities we wanted. We would get to pick new color schemes. PROBABLE/PROJECTED OUTCOMES: PEOPLE - -Would allow for as large a facility as we wanted so as many people as the new facility accommodated. However, location could effect some who like the present location. Longer term members would hate to leave the memories that the present facility holds. COMMUNITY -New facility could be designed to enhance community, but of course the programs and opportunities would need to be in place. DISCIPLESHIP --This would depend on programs, but different space could make it easier. FACILITIES -- Entirely new facility. Major building campaign. Would need to sell present site. LONG RANGE- -Opens up a lot of possibilities, but also changes dramatically what CPC is to people and the community. -6- Notes FReport for Session: Maximizing Facility Usage (January 1996) Christ Presbyterian Church Maximizing Current Facilities January 1996 Maximizing Current Facilities Usage Background CPC has been blessed with significant growth in the past four years. Sunday morning Worship attendance has Increased 339c overall. while children and youth programs have doubled. There seems to be no indication of it slowing down in the near future. Our growth is an outcome of our commitment to livin; out CPC's mission statement.: "... to be u caring communin centered in Christ. where those who seek God are Tieing transformed into disciples who impact the world. " ......................... ............................... During this past year, Session reviewed a variety of options for future growth. Alternatives ranged from maximizing current facilities to church planting to building additional facilities on the current site. As a short term strategy, Session members voted to maximize current space and rent off -site facilities while continuing to work on long -term plans. This gives CPC the opportunity to: Practice good stewardship Buy time to prepare for the future Signal to the congregation needs for growth, by spreading the "pain" and promoting a picture of what WE can do together to sen-e Christ. ......................... ............................... A task force was established to look at current space utilization and programming needs. Members of session. staff, and a deacon representative met over several occasions to assess critical space needs for the remainder of this year and for the next two program years. ......................... ............................... This summary report outlines the current and projected space needs, as well as recommendations and issues to consider for space utilization through 1997. Associated costs are also included. C.%ris/ Ptrslweiimn Chunk RePorl I,,/- S -s;ion -Ahl.% niciir, l•iu itih• 2 The Current Situation At certain times of the day and week, we are already at peak capacity. 1995 attendance numbers show continued growth. Average attendance figures for key areas include: Sunday Worship 8:30 249 9:40 608* 11:00 397 *Capacity Sunday Education (Totals) Children 618 Youth 135 Adults 240 In addition, 70% of adult education /small groups are held at other times. Some of these offerings would prefer Sunday a.m., but cannot because of space limitations. Wednesday Education We average 580+ (combined)on Wednesday night. All available space is being used. Some youth activities are already held off - site due to space limitations. ......................... ............................... We have already made a number of changes over the past two -three years to minimize overcrowding, enhance worship and education, and increase parking options. Specifically, we have: • Shifted some senior high programming to off -site and changed time to Sunday night. • Utilized the chapel, staff offices, counseling areas, the bride room, and library for Sunday a.m. and Wednesday p.m. educational offerings. • Moved coffee fellowship to the Multi- purpose room to utilize the fireside room for worship overflow. • Enhanced current parking and offered parking alternatives. Christ Pirs/nvniini C/unli l•iui/i /r (';.i,r -9- Current Situation Current facilities are being used in ways they were never intended. For example, counseling and staff offices are being used during second and third hour for children and vouch education. While this is certainly a creative solution to the space limitations, it does increase the «car and tear on these offices and meeting rooms. It is important to note that no amount of programming changes or short-term construction will "fix" certain building deficiencies. While certain features of our current facility meet our needs, we recognize some areas fall short. Over the past couple of years, creative solutions have been reviewed and in many cases, implemented to enhance all areas of our church. Things that are just not practical or consistent with our mission include: ■ Making alterations to the current sanctuary. ■ Removing the wall between the fireside room and the sanctuary. ■ Putting a second story on the fireside room. ■ Shortening all worship services (like Mt. Olivet). ■ Eliminating coffee and fellowship ■ Limiting Sunday School attendance to only registered children. C.'brisi PIrsbytelian C/mah Repari Inr.Srssinn- .11axim; inll Fat Win Usal, —1Q- Looking to the Future We don't have any reason to believe that our growth not continue. Even with the pressures on our facilities, we expect to grow on average 8 -10% in the coming years. This assumes we adhere w our mission statement and continue to provide a communing centered on the living God, and the "'ord. It also assumes we continue to provide qualiry programming for all ages. David Stark and Judie Ritchie have significant growth goals for adult education and membership involvement which could compound our space problems even more. It is difficult to predict these space needs. It is not unlikely that we could see a 30% increase in the participation of adults in Educational opportunities. Opportunities are expected to be spread throughout the week and most often be off -site. The continuing question will be —Where do we put the kids? For those of us that attend Sunday morning worship, but rarely venture bevond the Sanctuary and the front door, we have no idea of the significant numbers of children and youth involved in Sunday morning activities. Small children are the least flexible, therefore it is impractical to consider busing now or in the future. It goes without saying, parking and traffic control will continue to be a challenge. Chr/s/ Pn'sbYie an Chunh Report Fnrili /r 1 —11— Considered Options We can stretch resources through program year 1997. The task force, along with staff input, considered a variety of options. Sunday Worship ■ Change service (and style) times ■ Add a Saturday or Sunday night service ■ Reconfigure the current sanctuary ■ Stagger services by adding a fourth service in the Multi- purpose room, simulcast sermon into the Multi- purpose during the second hour Adult Education ■ Move some Sundav adult classes to Cornelia School ■ Add Adult Educarion at 8:20 ■ Expand and promote Adult Education and small group ministry off -lire Children ■ Use more Adult Education space ■ Split large rooms (Fellowship Hall) to accommodate more classes ■ If Saturday night service, add children's programming Youth • Bus older kids to Cornelia on Sunday • If Saturday night service, add youth programming Parking ■ Continue to rent parking off -site and use shuttle bus ■ Increase parking spaces on -site Christ Prra/n'Irrian C/turr /r Rr/�r „' iri Si:criru�- .Il,crirrri.iri� Fiiri /i�r (smr —12— Other ■ dove New Members Class to Cornelia ■ Hire a traffic consultant ■ Rent the Radisson Souch for holiday events Wednesday Education ■ Limit offerings on Wednesday night ■ Develop offerings off -site and at other times of the day /evening Chris/ P/isbi -te iall CGunh Repol -i iirSession,I/(iziiniZh1, Fari/iir ('w"r -13- Recommendations Changes recommended for next year. Recommendation #1 Change Sunday morning Service times starting in June. Worship style would also change. ■ 8:15 Traditional Service. 45 -50 minutes ■ 9:20 Blended Service ■ 10:40 Contemporary Service Rationale: This is the most logical, necessary first step. We believe this will even out the distribution of worshipers and allows for two peak services. Financial investment•. Minimal, estimate $5,000 Recommendation #2 Rent Cornelia School classrooms for some Sunday morning and Wednesday evening adult and older youth classes. We expect to need 6 -8 rooms on Sunday morning and 6 rooms on Wednesdav evening. Rationale: These age groups are the easiest to move off -site. Rooms vacated by the adults and youth will be used for children and younger youth classes. Offering adult classes off -site may also attract non- attenders from the community. Financial Investment: $10,000 - $15,000 /year Recommendation #3 Carpet the Multi- purpose room and install accordion style partitions in Fellowship Hall. Rationale: We increase our number of classrooms for both Sunday or Wednesday programming. Financial Investment: $30.000 Chris) Pirshrierian Chunk F-nihn, —14— Recommendation #4 A traffic consultant should be retained to assess parking needs and traffic movement through the parking lot between services. Other things we can do to improve parking include: Increasing shuttle bus usage and "biting the bullet" by developing on -site parking in the area of the Smiley House. Rationale: We need more parking options and better traffic flow. Financial Investment: Consultant: $5,000 Shuttle bus: Included in Recommendation = 1. Develop on -site parking: $80,000 Recommendation #5 The staff assesses space needs continuously. We recommend the task force members meet every three months(or sooner if needed) to review space needs to determine whether we need to implement additional options. Chri l hrs/�rirrinnC/unh F,ni/ilr f'.c,i,r -15- Issues to Discuss. The plan is only as good as those who promote and support it. Living out our Mission Statement is both exciting and scary (and everything inbetween). Leadership needs CO be bold in promoting these chanties. There will be trade -offs for everyone. We %vill all experience some inconveniences in the next couple of }ears. Certain member constituencies \vill be upset with the changes and think thev have been treated unfairly. It is vital that we provide an open environment, where concerns and ideas can be heard. Our sense of hurriedness and lack of community will not go away. We will continue to be struggle with these issues until we have better facilities to accommodate. We will need to be even more creative to over - compensate for our facilities. We may experience some flattening out of attendance figures until we can provide better facilities. Some may get discouraged with the parking lot and the crowds and just decide to stay away or attend more infrequently. Visitors could also get discouraged if we do not manage traffic flow and promote eommunity in creative ways. Christ PirsbVe ian C/urnh Reptiri 11a.N1m:111, !•,ni /ih• -16- Notes Summary of Facility Impact on Fulfillment of Mission Statement THE SOLUTION To respond to suggested changes: We implemented the recommendations ( #1) to change Sunday Worship services, and we began using Cornelia School for Sunday mornings, youth and adult classes ( #2). We continued to reassess space needs ( #5). December 1996 Situation: We continued to assess church space, our space needs and in December 1996, we did that using our Mission Statement as the framework. 'Christ Presbyterian Church aspires to be a caring community centered in Christ, inviting all who seek God to be transformed into disciples impacting their world.' -- Discipleship: To deepen the faith of our members, to live out their faith in the world. Community: To offer a variety of opportunities for connection and intimacy within CPC. Growth: To assess the resources needed for the ministries above, now and in the future. 'a caring community ": ( Fellowship /Caregiving /Assimilation /Engagement) the crowded schedule, shuttling and lack of a central fellowship space inhibit our ability to gather for times of greeting; there is instead a rushed, cramped atmosphere on Sunday mornings. While we believe we are unable to be a single- service community for reasons of style as well as stewardship, more interaction between services would enhance a sense of community. 'centered in Christ ": (Worship, which is supposed to be the core of all else) We believe the press of time and the constant overflow at the third service is counterproductive to worship at its fullest. A Sanctuary 30 years of has limitations in terms of technology awfully expensive to patch. The ideal schedule should include (3) prime time services in the course of a weekend, with two styles of worship, and including a Saturday option. 'Inviting all who seek God': (Outreach) ' Most people come to church for the first time to worship, and over 60% have said that they were invited by someone else. Unless they know to arrive in advance of the scheduled service time, parking is a significant obstacle. If the second service is comfortably full, and the third over -full, there is little room for many new folks. ' It seems unlikely that we will be able to draw in others, especially those with a nominal commitment to Christ, or none at all (our primary target audiences). -17- ' The current facility is very weak for showing newcomers where to go with children, or how to engage after worship. Facility is one way we show a commitment to be serious about outreach. 'to be transformed': (Sanctification) Current facilities require that Adult and Youth programming be held at Cornelia school on Sunday mornings, and allow for only one adult class on Wednesday evenings. ' Senior high programming has been moved to another night, or could not be held on -site. ' Educational programming will not grow in the current configuration, and will be challenging to sustain at current levels. 'disciples impacting their world ': (Missions) ' Mission begins with evangelism, a commitment to our 'Jerusalem', to be biblical, full -orbed ' Growth of the Home Base multiplies long -term mission giving, as more get the vision. ' We should include a mission component in any capital endeavor we undertake. ' Our primary mission tool is the changed lives of adults and youth sent back to their communities as salt and light, irrespective of Sanctuary size, but tied to our ability to disciple. -18- Letter to Congregation Regarding Session's Decision to Pursue Exon Christ Presbyterian ChurchT 690 1 Normandale Road, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55435 -1599 : Telephone (612) 920 -8515 Fax (612) 920 -4775 January 23, 1997 Dear Members and Friends of Christ Presbyterian Church: One of our goals at CRC has been a commitment to openness, sharing information as quickly as possible to facilitate trust. For the last several years, the Session (our elected governing body) has been studying and praying about how to handle the tremendous growth with which our congregation has been blessed. On January 21, 1997, the Session voted unanimously to initiate a process for a planned expansion of CPC's facilities, to continue our mission. No building design has yet been recommended, but four areas are identified as primary needs: worship, gathering and education spaces, plus parking provisions. We are writing to share this result with you, and inform you of several meetings where we will communicate more fully. We will begin developing specific architectural plans, and obtain necessary outside approvals. Each step of the way, we want to keep you informed, and engage the congregation in discussion of all alternatives. Why Did Session Decide to Recommend Expansion? Our mission statement declares that "Christ Presbyterian Church aspires to be a caring community centered in Chris; Inviting all who seek God to be transformed Into disciples impacting their world," which has guided our consideration of future facility needs. We focused on each clause of CPC's mission statement and considered, "How does our facility assist or hinder in fulfilling this clause of our mission statement ?" Our facility clearly hinders the fulfillment of our mission statement in many vital ways. For example, space limitations have necessitated additional worship services. This change has fragmented our community and shortened worship services, necessitating that worship be dictated by the clock. We have concerns that crucial elements in the service (i.e., sacraments, prayer concerns, confessional elements, mission announcements, personal greetings) are rushed and feel like an interruption in the service. These problems cannot be overcome, and in fact most would be exacerbated, by adding more Sunday morning worship services. Similarly, our commitment to seeing lives transformed is limited by a lack of space for education throughout the week, as seen in our shuttling program to Cornelia. What was the Process in making this decision? Session's decision follows a 1994 long -range planning Task Force, undertaken to discern God's future for CPC. Session examined the findings of the task force, then developed and considered in detail eight options for our future, sharing those with the congregation. In December of 1995, Session voted to (1) stay at our current location, (2) amend our Mission Statement to be an 'inviting church', (3) maximize our existing facilities, and (4) form a steering committee to consider whether or not CPC should expand its facilities. Since February 1996, the steering committee has received prayer support and input from members and congregational ministry groups, and has —19— enlisted the experience of outside consultants (parking, architectural and financial) to evaluate our options. What about alternatives? The recommendation to build has been based on our church's mission, not just a need for more elbow room. Further creative programming and logistical strategies (like our use of Cornelia school) may or may not alleviate a crowding problem; they will not alleviate the rushed feeling, our inability to gather together as a church family, or offer an engaging environment to invite others to grow spiritually. Many programming and logistic changes have been implemented, and even more considered. We have reached a point where such changes strike against the essential character of this particular congregation, and the mission to which we believe God has called us. For this reason, the steering committee unanimously recommended, and Session unanimously approved, that a capital campaign be undertaken this spring to finance the anticipated expansion of CPC's facilities. What can you do7 As your representatives, we have taken a great deal of time to think, plan, discuss and pray through these complex issues. Many ideas were challenged, and minds were changed, before coming to this proposal. Some of you are already excited as you hear about plans for the future, while others may not be comfortable with Session's recommendation to build at this time. We ask that you receive and consider all information about this proposal with an open and prayc:ful mind and heart. You are invited to our annual meeting this Sunday, January 261h, following the third service, to receive more information regarding Session's decision and process. This meeting is not intended to be a full discussion of the decision and process, but is designed to be an introduction, one more piece of the dialogue with you. Going forward there will be additional forums for discussion, and many publications with background and information. You are also strongly encouraged to attend the kick-off meeting for our Stewardship Enrichment program, a Leadership Challenge, on Tuesday, February 4th. at 6:30 in the Fireside Room (light refreshments will be served starting at 6:00). During this 11/2 hour meeting you will learn more about what we believe God is calling CPC to do. Come and hear how this scripturally based stewardship program will not only enable us to build facilities to carry out God's mission, but also draw each of us into a closer walk with our Lord. In closing, we want to communicate to you our growing sense of excitement for what God has been doing at CPC, and what lies ahead. These are wonderful times for us, with great challenges and opportunities! We ask you to continue lifting this process up to God in your prayers. We pray that our leadership, our members, our neighbors, and all who vote on this process will listen to each other with openness and respect. Our ultimate goal is not a larger building, but rather that CPC will continue to faithfully pursue its mission statement. In Christ, The Staff and Session —20— I HISTORY OF PREVIOUS LAND ACQUISITIONS, LAND SALES, AND BUILDING EXPANSIONS * 1957: Land purchased at comer of 70th Street and Highway 100 for original sanctuary (200 seats) and parsonage, first ground breaking. * 1958: Purchased residence on 70th Street, east of parking lot entrance (the "Smiley House'). * 1960: Educational wing added to original sanctuary. * 1968: Current sanctuary (498 seats) and Fellowship Hall built. * 1973: Vacant lots north of 69th Street donated to CPC (church has paid taxes on these lots since 1973). * Mid- 1970s: MNDOT takes approximately 1.3 acres of CPC's original property to accomodate the expansion of and improvements to Highway 100 and the 70th Street interchange. * 1980: Fireside Room built in courtyard area off of sanctuary on west side of building (provides an additional 150 seats for sanctuary functions). * 1989: Remodeled and updated building to meet code; added Mufti- Purpose Room, counseling offices, administration offices and chapel. * 1994: Purchased property at comer of Normandale Road and 69th Street (property is being rented out; church pays taxes on it). * January 1997: Purchased property on Brittany Road, second lot north of 69th Street (property has been rental for many years; church is continuing to rent it out; church is paying taxes on it). * April 1997: Purchased property at Brittany Road and 69th Street (property is being rented out; church pays taxes on it). -21- Notes EXAMPLES OF NON -CPC GROUPS USING CPUS FACILITY 55 -Alive Refresher Driving Classes (3x/year) Jr. Olympic Volleyball Team Alcoholics Anonymous Loaves and Fishes Inner City Feeding Bible Study Fellowship (400+ Edina women) Local Basketball Leagues Blood Drive (3x/ year) Local Soccer Practice Boy Scout Pack Meetings (2) Unidos Encristo Chess Club (Edina P-6 1h graders) Mediation Meeting Children's Hospital Staff Retreat MN Christian Writers Guild (100 +) Childbirth Collective Neighbors Homewatch Meeting Church Alive Men's Group Non - Member Music Recitals Community Open Basketball Open Volleyball Cub Scouts Pack Meetings Overnights for out -of -town groups DAR Meetings Plymouth Congregation, SD, Overnight District VII Steering Committee Precepts Bible Study DRIP - Senior Drop -In Hour (30 +) Precinct Voting Location Edina Grief Support Scotland Group Edina Service Team Southview Middle School Leadership Retreat Edina Soccer Club Stations of the Cross (1000 +) InterFaith Hospitality TEC Weekend Retreats (100 +) Community Fine Arts Concerts (3 /year) United Properties Meeting Girl Scouts Troop Weigh Down Workshop (30 +) Hemotology /Oncology Retreat World Vision Training Sessions Inner -City Tutoring Groups Women of Vision Meetings -22- 12 -Step Groups Employment Spouse Support Employment Support Group Fathering Group Network (shelter for Homeless) Younger Spouse Loss Group (w/ children) Men's Anger Management Group Mom's Morning Olive Ewe Board Meeting Search for Significance Sexual Abuse Support Single Parents Support Group Southdale Alanon Edynamoes (150+ Edina Seniors) EXAMPLES OF ON -GOING CPC SERVICE PROJECTS IN METRO AREA In addition to a missions budget over $700,000 ($300,000+ for the metro area), CPC groups volunteer in these organizations among others: Habitat for Humanity Urban Ventures (Father Center/ Job Creation) Calvary Kidstuff (Clothing Store) Loaves and Fishes (Food Program) VEAP (Food Shelf/ Housing) Frasier Friends/ developmentally challenged St. Louis Park Health Care (visiting shut -ins) Naomi Family Center (abused women/children) Minneapolis Crisis Nursery (children) Homework `n Hoops (tutoring youth) Young Life (city Youth) Carondelet Life Care (medical assistance) Urban Homeworks (housing) Youth Enterprise Foundation -23- Notes SUMMARY OF CPC'S COMMUNICATION WITH ITS NEIGHBORS * April 1996: CPC called a neighborhood meeting. Neighbors were informed that a Steering Committee had been formed to study whether CPC would need to expand in the near future. CPC promised to keep them informed of the outcome from its study. * January 1997: CPC sent a letter to neighbors informing them that the Session had voted to proceed with expansion plans and promising to gather neighbors to answer their questions and seek their input for its design. * April 1997: CPC called two meetings with its neighbors to outline proposed building plans and parking options, hear their concerns, answer their questions and seek their input regarding its design. CPC promised neighbors it would not submit an application to the city without first reviewing its revised design with them. CPC representatives also attended, by invitation, a meeting called by the neighbors. * May 1997: CPC sent a letter to its neighbors summarizing the concerns that had been. raised to date and giving all neighbors names and phone numbers of CPC representatives they could contact with any questions or concerns they had throughout this process. Numerous personal conversations were held with interested neighbors, mostly initiated by CPC representatives in an effort to solicit input. * Neighbors opposing CPC's proposal reactivated the long- dormant Woodhill Association (the "Association') for the purpose of giving their opposition an official voice. CPC representatives began talking to the Association representatives as the official representatives for the neighborhood. * June 1997: CPC representatives met with Association representatives. It was agreed discussions would continue at a July meeting. * July 1997: CPC representatives had a lunch meeting with Steve Brown and Tom Carrico of the Association to discuss neighbors' concerns, communication expectations, and a possible timeframe for CPC's design revisions. It was clearly indicated that the redesign process was just starting and that 3 to 5 months would pass before CPC would have anything to communicate back to them. Fall 1997: CPC representatives tried numerous times to talk to Association representatives by phone, often leaving messages. On October 18, Steve Brown and Tom Carrico were informed in person that CPC was actively reviewing its financial options and working on revised drafts of design alternatives. They were told that CPC would not be submitting anything for its neighbors' review until mid - January at the earliest. They seemed relieved that neighborhood meetings would not be held until after the holidays. -24- UPC's Letter to Neignoors Kegaraing Decision to Pursue Expansion (1/28/97) Christ 'Presbyterian Church 6901 Normandalc Road, Akinncapolis, Akinncsota 55435 -1599 : Tcicphonc (612) 920 -8515 January 28, 1997 Dear Neighbors of Christ Presbyterian Church: Christ Presbyterian Church is celebrating its fortieth anniversary. During our years at 70th Street and Highway 100, CPC has faced many crossroads, and now stands at another one. For several years, the Session (our elected governing body) has studied and prayed about how to handle CPC's tremendous growth. On January 21, 1997, the Session voted unanimously to initiate a process for a planned expansion of CPC's facilities. No building design has yet been recommended. We will now develop specific architectural plans and obtain necessary approvals. Last April, at neighborhood meetings, we informed many of you about our planning process and promised to inform you of any significant developments. Accordingly, we are writing to tell you of the Session's recent decision and to express our desire to keep an open and honest two -way line of communication with you as this process unfolds. What was the process in making this decision? In 1994, CPC initiated a long -range planning process to discern God's future for our church. The Session and our congregation considered eight options for our future, ranging from doing nothing, to planting new churches in other locations, to abandoning our present site and building a new facility at another location. In December of 1995, Session decided on a two-pronged approach to handling our facility concerns. First it voted to stay at our current location and maximize our existing facilities. Examples of those maximization efforts include changes in the Sunday worship service schedule, moving adult and youth education classes to Cornelia Elementary School, initiating and then expanding our shuttle bus service, and changing some of our Wednesday night education programming. Second, Session authorized the formation of a steering committee to look beyond our maximizing efforts to make recommendations regarding whether facility changes would be needed in the foreseeable future and what steps should be taken to best prepare us for any such changes. Since February 1996, the steering committee has received prayer support and input from our congregation, and has enlisted the experience of outside consultants (parking, architectural and financial) to evaluate our needs and options. Why did Session decide to recommend expansion? Our mission statement declares that "Christ Presbyterian Church aspires to be a caring community centered in Christ, inviting all who seek God to be transformed into disciples impacting their world." This mission has guided our consideration of future facility needs. We focused on each clause of CPC's mission statement and considered the question, "How does our facility assist or hinder us in fulfilling this clause of our mission statement ?" Our facility clearly hinders the fulfillment of our mission statement in many vital ways. For example, space limitations have necessitated additional worship services. This change has fragmented our community and shortened worship services, necessitating that worship be dictated by the clock. -26- CPC's Letter to Neighbors Regarding Neighbors' Concerns (5/13/97) Christ -Presbyterian Church 6901 Normandale Road, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55435 -1599 : Telephone (614) 920 -8515 Fax (614) 920 -4775 May 13, 1997 Dear Neighbor of Christ Presbyterian Church: Thanks to all of you who attended our neighbor meetings to learn about and discuss CPC's proposed expansion. For those unable to attend, enclosed is an Information Sheet with basic points regarding CPC's growth and history, our building proposal, and the decision- making process (including alternatives considered and steps taken to delay the need to build) for the proposed expansion. If your understanding of our proposal is different from what is set forth in the enclosed Information Sheet, we would welcome the opportunity to discuss the facts with you as you may have hear inaccurate or incomplete information. Many of our neighbors (including non - members of CPC) have no opposition to CPC's expansion. In this letter, we will summarize the concerns we have heard from some neighbors opposing any expansion of CPC so that all neighbors are hearing similar information regarding the issues raised. Christ Presbyterian Church has been a part of the Woodhill neighborhood for 40 years. Some neighbors have made it clear they do not consider CPC to be a good neighbor. Examples of objections to CPC's past conduct have included a dislike of the daily chimes CPC used to ring and of horse -drawn sleighs of CPC carolers during the Christmas season, landscaping concerns (including dry grass), a perception we may have not complied with conditions set forth in our last expansion, and insufficient communication with our neighbors in the past. We heard again the concern that CPC may pursue building a retirement facility on our site - an idea briefly discussed in the 196O's, but never pursued. That idea was abandoned decades ago, but rumors of it continued to be circulated. We have heard statements expressed as fact by some neighbors that the Edina City Council told CPC it could not expand further. The record is void of any such resolution by the City. The City planning staff is aware of our project (although a formal application has not yet been made) and has never indicated that any special limitation was ever placed on further CPC expansion. We have heard some people say, in the past, CPC representatives indicated CPC would not seek any future expansion. The record does not fully reflect past exchanges of statements or the context in which to interpret them. It is difficult to address an issue based solely on conflicting memories that may be faulty on both sides. Rather than debate the accuracy of memories of the past, CPC is simply committed to approaching this project with integrity, openness and improved communication with our neighbors. -28- Size of Church - Many of our neighbors support a growing church, but some said CPC is becoming a "mega- church" and no longer belongs in a residential area. It is commonly said that a church either grows or becomes stagnant and dies. If the only option open to growing churches in Edina is to move out of Edina, this community may lose a vibrant component in its make -up. Some neighbors opposing CPC's expansion have questioned our intentions in trying to communicate with our neighbors. We can only say it is our sincere desire to keep you informed, to listen to your concerns and to seek and try to integrate your input into our design. We intend to cultivate an open line of communication between CPC and our neighbors, not just during this period of proposed expansion, but into the future. If you ever have a concern regarding CPC, please tell us. Many avoidable misunderstandings and resentments fester through a lack of communication. We will continue to inform our members of any ongoing neighborhood concerns and to remind our members to be thoughtful neighbors while traveling through this area (i.e. watching our speed, yielding to neighbors trying to exit their driveways, parking a safe distance from driveways, etc.) We expect to finalize our designs in June. You will have an opportunity to view and comment on our design prior to its submission to the City Planning Commission. Meanwhile, if you have any questions or input you want to share, or want to express your support or opposition to our expansion, please call Polly Bowles (942 -4959) or Matt Faulkner (545- 6055). Sincerely, Q Polly eterson Bowles CPC Steering Committee, Neighborhood Liaison cc: Edina City Council Members Edina City Planning Commission Members -30- Information Sheet Regarding Expansion of Christ Presbyterian Church CPC'S GROWTH IN PAST 6 YEARS: • Worship Attendance: Roughly 7 -8% annual growth has increased attendance from 34,000 /year to 62,000 /year, with average Sunday morning attendance between 1100 -1200. • Membership: Up from 1,700 to 3,000 (includes adults and youth who have been confirmed or joined through a new member's class). • Youth Education: (6'" -12' grade) Trippled youth group (average attendance: 260 on Wednesday evenings 120 on Sunday mornings 50 on Sunday evenings • Children's Education: (Birth to 5"' grade) Up from one class per grade to four classes per grade. Average attendance: 600 on Sunday mornings 150 + on Wednesday evenings • Growth from within Edina: Percentage of new members joining during this period who live in Edina has held steady between 45 -55°x. CPC continues to attract its greatest percentage of members from its home community. • Number of neighbors involved in CPC Programs: Records indicate over 400. PROPOSED EXPANSION: • Areas of Need: Sanctuary space, education space, fellowship space, and parking • New Sanctuary: Proposed Size: 1000 seats (current sanctuary seats 400 +; new sanctuary would be approximately the same size of sanctuaries at Colonial, Our Lady of Grace and Grace churches in Edina). Proposed Location: south of existing sanctuary, toward intersection of 70' Street and Hwy 100. Parking: Various proposals are being considered. We are currently working with our architect to determine how we can maximize our available spaces, while still incorporating the concerns and suggestions of our neighbors. -31- COMMUNICATION WITH NEIGHBORS: • April 1996: CPC called two neighborhood meetings. Neighbors were informed that a Steering Committee had been formed to study whether CPC would need to expand in the near future. We promised to keep them informed of the outcome from our study. • January 1997: CPC sent a letter to neighbors informing them that our Session had voted to proceed with expansion plans and promising to gather neighbors to answer their questions and seek their input for our design. • April 1997: PC called two meetings with the neighbors to outline proposed building plans and parking options, hear their concerns, answer their questions and seek their input regarding our site design. CPC representatives also attend, by invitation, a meeting called by the neighbors. Throughout this period, numerous personal conversations were held with interested neighbors, mostly initiated by CPC representatives. Additional meetings and correspondence will take place with our neighbors in the coming months. HISTORY OF PREVIOUS BUILDING EXPANSIONS AND LAND ACQUISITIONS: • 1957: Land purchased at corner of 70' Street and Highway 100 for original sanctuary and parsonage, first ground breaking. • 1958: Purchased residence on 70'" Street, east of parking lot entrance (the "Smiley House). • 1960: Educational wing added to original sanctuary. • 1968: Current sanctuary and Fellowship Hall built. • 1973: Vacant lots north of 69' Street donated to church (church has paid taxes on these lots since 1973). • 1980: Fireside Room built in courtyard area off of sanctuary on west side of building. • 1989: Remodeled and updated building to meet code; added Multi- Purpose Room, counseling offices, administration offices and chapel. • 1994: Purchased property at corner of Normandale Road and 69"' Street (property is being rented out; church pays taxes on it). • January 1997: Purchased property on Brittany Road, second lot north of 69"' Street (property has been rental for many years; church is continuing to rent it out; church is paying taxes on it). • April 1997: Purchased property at Brittany Road and 69"' Street (previous owner will retain possession until a future date; church will pay taxes on it). -33- Letter rrom neignbors uienn ana bonnie nay Regarding Their Concerns Mr. & Mrs. Glenn E. Ray 4801 W. 70th St. Edina, MN. 55435 May 19, 1997 Polly Peterson Bowles CPC Steering Committee, Neighborhood Liaison Christ Presbyterian Church 6901 Normandale Blvd. Minneapolis, Mn. 55435 -1599 Dear Ms. Bowles: We received your letter dated May 13, 1997 and read it over with interest. The history of the growth of your church was interesting, and although we agree that there can be some misinformation out there (wherever that is), we don't agree that you are clearing the air very much with your letter. The neighbors have two major concerns: 1. The traffic - we have enough already, thank you. You cannot expect us to be happy that your future plans will make an already bad problem worse. There is nothing in your letter to remove that problem. The only way to remove it is for CPC to abandon their expansion plans. 2. Property values - it was interesting that your letter spent a good deal of time and took much space to advance the cause of CPC, but spent 5 lines concerning one of the major problems!!! We feel you want to "sweep that under the rug ". Being "sensitive" in our estimation is that CPC abandon plans to expand. It seems appropriate that you would get more specific information about our property values .... like bring over some "independent" Realtors and or appraisal companies and tax assessors. It would be of great interest that you give us the names and specifics of those you seem to quote when you say "we are advised that churches are usually considered a positive factor in drawing families to communities ". We would be happy to supply you with specific names of Realtors, etc. that will tell you point blank that your expansion WILL NEGATIVELY IMPACT PROPERTY VALUES!! One suggestion might be that CPC guarantee the value of our homes, or perhaps you folks who are planning this could move in where we are and then see how you would vote! -35- Lastly, I would like to remind'you that there is no place in the Bible that says the "ends justify the means ". If you can find that, please forward it to us ASAP. Christ would never ever want negatives to be sold in order to honor His name. You may want to rationalize that you are doing this for the "Lord ". You have no claim to Him anymore than any other church, and you have no right to damage our neighborhood in His name. We'd like a response to this letter, please, with specifics, not generalities. 7 cc: Edina Planning Commission Members City Council Members Dr. & Mrs. David Hamilton Bob and Joan Hursh Mr. & Mrs. Charles Putman Mr. & Mrs. Lee Scofield -36- Letter from Polly Bowles Responding to Rays' Letter Christ Presbyterian Churc 6901 Normandale Road, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55435 -1599 June 9, 1997 Mr. And Mrs. Glenn E. Ray 4801 West 70th Street Edina, MN 55435 Re: Christ Presbyterian Church Proposed Expansion Dear Mr. And Mrs. Ray: Il Telephone (612) 920 -8515 Fax (612) 920 -4775 Since your original mailing never reached me, thank you for remailing your letter dated May 19, 1997 to my home address. We appreciate that you will voice your concerns. Having lived %2 block from CPC for 26 years, I have strong feelings for the Woodhill neighborhood. Since my mother still lives on Wilford Way, any impacts CPC's expansion may have on the neighborhood will be directly felt by my family, too. Therefore, I am committed to helping CPC minimize any negative impacts. The purpose of my previous letter to the neighborhood was not to answer all our neighbors' concerns, but rather to set forth the issues raised to date as a check that we are hearing all concerns. If neighbors have concerns not listed in my letter, we wanted to give everyone a chance to add to the list so that all concerns are on the table and can be considered as we make design decisions. Accordingly, my letter designated specific contact people, Matt Faulkner and me, and included our phone numbers so that anyone, like yourselves, could contact us directly to discuss CPC's plans. CPC wants to hear neighbor concerns and any design suggestions so that we can proceed with the least intrusive design possible. Your letter raised three major points: traffic, property values, and spiritual concerns. I will try to address each of these areas. 1. Traffic - CPC's growth will certainly bring more cars into CPC's parking lot. The number of those cars that will travel on any particular street is unclear today. Traffic flow can be influenced by our site design. The traffic study commissioned by CPC is one tool to assist us in our design decisions. I understand you would not "be happy" about anything you believe might increase traffic in front of your house. However, I would ask you to keep in perspective the actual amount of traffic on 70th Street being generated by CPC versus the amount of traffic on 70th Street resulting from its role as a Minor B Arterial within the regional traffic system. Seventieth Street serves as a major connector between Highway 100, Edina's Industrial Park and the -37- Southdale areas, and takes traffic pressure off of Highways 494, 100 and 62. The traffic growth on 70th Street is largely attributable to the growth of commercial activity in the Industrial Park and Southdale areas and a general growth in traffic throughout the region. For the community-at- large, CPC's location on the comer of Highway 100 and 70th Street has the benefit of allowing healthy church growth at a very accessible site. However, CPC understands that for you, the closeness of your home to CPC and Highway 100 raises heightened concerns regarding traffic. CPC will continue to consider traffic flow as we prepare our final site design. 2. Property Values - The question of what impact, if any, CPC's expansion might have on neighborhood property values simply cannot be measured by anyone before a final design is determined. This umbrella concern arches over other concerns such as traffic, area access, landscaping and general site appearance, etc. The brevity of my discussion in my earlier letter was certainly not an attempt to sweep this concern under the rug as you suggest. The letter was simply an acknowledgment that property value impact is a concern of our neighbors of which we are aware. Working with our neighbors to achieve an attractive and functional site design is one way we can protect surrounding property values. You challenged my,statement that churches add to the attractiveness of a community. My statement was based in part on numerous conversations I and other CPC members have had with realtors, City of Edina planning staff and Metropolitan Council staff. The common wisdom shared with us is that churches, like schools, help give a community identity and stability. My statement is also based on my experience serving as vice -chair of the Metropolitan Council, representing a district that included Edina. During my tenure, the Council worked on a project (the "Human Investment Framework's that acknowledged the important role organizations like churches play in developing community leaders, building neighborhood cohesion, and supplementing necessary community services (something that is even more important today in the wake of government welfare cuts). According to Hal Freshley, a Met Council staff member, Eli Lily Corporation is even funding churches in troubled neighborhoods as a tool for adding stability to those neighborhoods. Clearly, active churches play a vital role in making communities healthy and attractive. In your letter, you state that realtors have told you CPC's expansion will negatively impact property values. The effect of having a church in the neighborhood and the effect of that church expanding may be different; therefore, my statement and your assertion are not mutually exclusive. Despite what realtors may have said to the neighbors, no one can estimate what impact, if any, CPC's building proposal may have on your property's value without seeing a final site design. Similarly, no one can estimate now what effect, if any, CPC's departure from its current site might have on your property value. Such an estimate would require a determination of what kind of future development would be pursued by a subsequent owner of the land now occupied by CPC. If my assertion that healthy churches play a vital role in stabilizing and serving their communities is true, and if your assertion that the growth and expansion of healthy churches will have a negative impact on the property values of homes immediately surrounding them -38- is true, then communities like Edina that are virtually fully- developed will always face a tough choice. Do they encourage healthy, active churches like CPC to flourish in their communities, or do they stifle the growth of such churches and cause them to stagnate, or do they essentially push them out of their communities into the outer ring suburbs that have land available for new development? 3. Spiritual Concerns - You ended your letter to me by charging CPC with trying to use God to justify our actions. This simply is not true. Have we asked our members to pray for God's guidance regarding whether or not CPC should undertake a capital campaign for a possible facility expansion and do we urge them to continue to pray for God's guidance in how CPC proceeds? Absolutely! Have we ever asked our members to pray for a bigger building? No, we have not. Neither have we ever told our neighbors they should accept our proposal as God's will or that God does not hear our neighbor's prayers as well as CPC's. In fact, in CPC's neighborhood meetings (which I presided over) and in my letter to the neighbors, I consciously tried to avoid interjecting CPC's congregational prayer process into the public consideration of CPC's proposal in an attempt to avoid any reaction such as yours. I only bring it up in this letter because you raised the issue in your letter and asked for a response. Neither I nor CPC has ever or will ever tell you or your neighbors that opposition to CPC's proposal goes against the will of God. Only you can determine how God wants you to respond to CPC's proposal. When I agreed to serve on the committee that was to recommend whether or not CPC should proceed with an expansion proposal, I was against an expansion. After months of study and prayer, I believe that God's will for me is that I help CPC pursue its expansion proposal. Contrary to your letter, doing God's will can, indeed, involve negatives or costs, sometimes significant costs. For me, the personal costs have included such things as time, sacrificial dollars pledged to this project, entering into a conflict with some of my former neighbors (some of whom have been friends of mine for years), and, to the extent CPC's expansion impacts its neighbors, helping to place those impacts on my own mother. I have tried to address the comments in your letter as you requested. If you would like to discuss this matter any further, I would be happy to talk to you directly. You may call me at 941 -4959. Sincerely, Polly eterson Bowles cc: Edina City Council Members Edina Planning Commission Members Dr. and Mrs. David Hamilton Bob & Joan Hursh Mr. And Mrs. Charles Putnam Mr. And Mrs. Lee Scofield -39- Notes CPC's Letter to Congregation Regarding Neighbors' Concerns Christ Presbyterian Church I 6901 Normandale Road, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55435 -1599 : Telephone (612) 920 -8515 Fax (612) 920 -4775 May 9, 1997 Dear Members and Friends of Christ Presbyterian Church: We have recently completed our round of Share the Vision Home Information Sessions. A frequent question related to our communication with our neighbors. This letter summarizes our communication to date and what we are hearing from our neighbors. Communication With CPC Neighbors April 1996 - CPC called two neighbor meetings and informed neighbors that a Steering Committee had been formed to study whether CPC would pursue an expansion in the near future. • January 1997 - CPC sent a letter to neighbors informing them that our Session had voted to initiate a capital campaign to fund a possible facilities expansion. • April 1997 - CPC invited neighbors to meet with us on April 7th and 13`h to hear about design options being considered and to share their concerns and design input with us. Around 50 neighbors attended each meeting (with some repeat attendees). On April 11 `h, CPC representatives attended, by invitation, a meeting called by some of our neighbors. We are sending a letter to our neighbors summarizing the concerns we have heard to date so that all neighbors are hearing similar information regarding the issues raised. Throughout this period, numerous personal conversations have been held with interested neighbors, mostly initiated by CPC representatives. We continue to seek out our neighbors' input. We are trying to be mindful of their concerns and to incorporate their input as we work on possible designs. We expect to finalize our design in June. We have promised to let ou8r neighbors view and comment on our final design before we submit it to the Edina Planning Commission. Neighbors' Concerns and Comments: CPC is oerceived to be a bad neighbor - Totally apart from our expansion project, this belief on the part of many of our neighbors is of great concern to us. We as a church need to be sensitive to how our programming and maintenance decision affect or are perceived by our neighbors. Individual members can help this situation by being thoughtful of the neighbors as we travel their streets (i.e., watch our speed, yield to neighbors trying to exit their driveways, park a safe distance from driveways, etc.) Beliefs that the Edina City Council told CPC it could not expand further. - The _record is void of any such resolution by the City. The City Planning staff is aware of our project and has never indicated that any special limitation was ever placed on further CPC expansion. -40- Neiahbors' Oonosition Efforts: Many of our neighbors have indicated they have no problem with our possible expansion. The neighbors who do oppose our expansion are organizing their efforts. Some are writing and calling the members of the Edina City Council and the Planning Commission. They have reactivated the long- dormant Woodhill Association to give an official voice to their opposition. Once we submit a design to the city, they plan to circulate a petition against our design, regardless of the design we choose. The neighbors opposing our plans intend to seek a moratorium on any future expansion of CPC. What we can do: We encourage you to talk to Edina residents you know to educate them about what we are proposing and why. Please listen to any concerns or input you hear and share them with us. Many neighbors (including non - members of CPC) have no opposition to CPC's expansion; however, they are reluctant to enter into a public disagreement with their opposing neighbors. It is essential that Edina residents who have experienced the benefits of CPC's programs, have enjoyed the use of our facilities, or simply believe that a vibrant church in our community is of benefit to Edina as a whole, speak up regarding our proposal. Neighbors who are even willing to simply state they do not object to the expansion can help balance the organized effort of opposing neighbors. We also encourage Edina residents to write or call the members of the Edina City Council and the City Planning Commission to express their support for CPC (a directory is enclosed). If you have any questions, or hear supportive or opposing comments you care to pass along, please call Polly Bowles (941 -4959) or Matt Faulkner (545- 6055). In His love and service, Q feterson Bowles CPC Steering Committee, Neighborhood Liaison -42- Information Sheet Regarding Expansion of Christ Presbyterian Church CPC'S GROWTH IN PAST 6 YEARS: • Worship Attendance: Roughly 7 -8% annual growth has increased attendance from 34,000 /year to 62,000 /year, with average Sunday morning attendance between 1100 -1200. • Membership: Up from 1,700 to 3,000 (includes adults and youth who have been confirmed or joined through a new member's class). • Youth Education: (6"' -12°i grade) Trippled youth group (average attendance: 260 on Wednesday evenings 120 on Sunday mornings 50 on Sunday evenings • Children's Education: (Birth to 5"' grade) Up from one class per grade to four classes per grade. Average attendance: 600 on Sunday mornings 150 + on Wednesday evenings • Growth from within Edina: Percentage of new members joining during this period who live in Edina has held steady between 45 -55%. CPC continues to attract its greatest percentage of members from its home community. • Number of neighbors involved in CPC Programs: Records indicate over 400. PROPOSED EXPANSION: • Areas of Need: Sanctuary space, education space, fellowship space, and parking • New Sanctuary: Proposed Size: 1000 seats (current sanctuary seats 400 +; new sanctuary would be approximately the same size of sanctuaries at Colonial, Our Lady of Grace and Grace churches in Edina). Proposed Location: south of existing sanctuary, toward intersection of 70' Street and Hwy 100. Parking: Various proposals are being considered. We are currently working with our architect to determine how we can maximize our available spaces, while still incorporating the concerns and suggestions of our neighbors. -44- COMMUNICATION WITH NEIGHBORS: • April 1996: CPC called two neighborhood meetings. Neighbors were informed that a Steering Committee had been formed to study whether CPC would need to expand in the near future. We promised to keep them informed of the outcome from our study. • January 1997: CPC sent a letter to neighbors informing them that our Session had voted to proceed with expansion plans and promising to gather neighbors to answer their questions and seek their input for our design. • April 1997: PC called two meetings with the neighbors to outline proposed building plans and parking options, hear their concerns, answer their questions and seek their input regarding our site design. CPC representatives also attend, by invitation, a meeting called by the neighbors. Throughout this period, numerous personal conversations were held with interested neighbors, mostly initiated by CPC representatives. Additional meetings and correspondence will take place with our neighbors in the coming months. HISTORY OF PREVIOUS BUILDING EXPANSIONS AND LAND ACQUISITIONS: • 1957: Land purchased at corner of 70' Street and Highway 100 for original sanctuary and parsonage, first ground breaking. • 1958: Purchased residence on 70' Street, east of parking lot entrance (the "Smiley House). • 1960: Educational wing added to original sanctuary. • 1968: Current sanctuary and Fellowship Hall built. • 1973: Vacant lots north of 69 " Street donated to church (church has paid taxes on these lots since 1973). • 1980: Fireside Room built in courtyard area off of sanctuary on west side of building. • 1989: Remodeled and updated building to meet code; added Multi- Purpose Room, counseling offices, administration offices and chapel. • 1994: Purchased property at corner of Normandale Road and 69' Street (property is being rented out; church pays taxes on it). • January 1997: Purchased property on Brittany Road, second lot north of 691 Street (property has been rental for many years; church is continuing to rent it out; church is paying taxes on it). • April 1997: Purchased property at Brittany Road and 69' Street (previous owner will retain possession until a future -date; church will pay taxes on it). -46- �\ 1 Woodhill Association Notice of 6/23/97 Meeting with Its Proposed Expansion Overview and Preliminary Resolution of Opposition to be Presented at that Meeting CHRIST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH IS IN THE FINAL STAGES OF DEVELOPING PLANS FOR A MAJOR SITE ACQUISITION AND EXPANSION OF THEIR EXISTING CAMPUS AT THE CORNER OF WEST 70TH STREET AND HWY.. 100. THIS EXPANSION WILL HAVE A DRAMATIC IMPACT ON THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOODS AND OUR COMMUNITY. TN sF GHANcE5 ARE NCT TEMPORARY, BUT RATHER PERMANENT IN NATURE. IF THESE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ARE APPROVED BY THE EmNA CITY COUNCIL, THE IMPACT THEY WILL HAVE WILL PEBMANENTI-Y AFFECT THE QUALITY AND CHARACTER OF OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. IF YOU ARE UNFAMILIAR WITH THE PROPOSED PLANS, A BRIEF DESCRIPTION IS ATTACHED TO GIVE YOU AN OVERVIEW. ALSO INCLUDED IS A COPY OF THE PRELIMINARY RESOLUTION OF THE WOODHILL EDINA ASSOCIATION BOARD OF DIRECTORS OPPOSING THE PROPOSED EXPANSION. IF YOU ARE INTEFtE.STED IN UNDERSTANDING THE POTENI7AL IMPACT OF THESE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS OR ALREADY HAVE SPECIFIC CONCERNS, YOU NEED TO GET INVOLVED NOW 1 THE MOMENTUM SURROUNDING THIS ISSUE IS INCREASING RAPIDLY AND YOUR INPUT AND INVOLVEMENT - ITICAI IF WM ARE TO HAVE A VOICZ WfTH THE CHURCH AND THF- CrTy oF EmNA. IF =Lj 154014 a • ANO EX-- . - 9ZLE How,:-YOu t3ONIT HAVE _.X gim-rriso COMPLAIN IF YQU ARE UNHAPPY WM!J THE QUICOME-1 -48- VINE WILL BE HAVING A NEIGHBORHOOD MEEnNG TO DISCUSS THIS SITUATION IN DETAIL ON iALYZ 2302 AT 7-'00 PM Al THE YoaK AND YOUR ATTENDANCE WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. IF. YOU. HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR WOULD LIKE MORE INFORMATION PLEASE CALL ANY OF THE FOLLOWING PEOPLE: STEPHEN BROWN (H) 927-4713 (wv) 8 20-1 630 TOM CARRICO (H) 926 -2723 (w) 229 -9645 Cot I WEEN GALLAGHER 920-6660 Ducar. Gooca.L- RcsERM (H) 922 -4506 FLOYD GRABIEL (H) 920-1048 (W) 835 -7700 SANDY KUEHN (H) 929-4863 FRED LITTLE (H) 9.20 -9639 (w) 9 29-03 26 DEAN KovAc (W 927 -9282 Ml) 927-4474 WYN MEEKER (H) 922-5679 MARTY PROssr (H) 928 -9658 (w) 831-4890 RICK SIMMONS (W 927 -4832 (w) 992-3906 ADRIENNE WEIN8ER0ZR (W 922 -7426 -49- CHRIST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH PRO P-059:12 EXPANSION OVERVIEW I . CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW 1 000 SEAT SANCTUARY. THIS IS A I SO% INCREASE FROM THE CURRENT SANCTUARY AND WOULD RANK IT AS ONE OF THE LARGEST SANCTUARIES IN THE TWIN CITIES. 2. CONVERSION OP EXISTING 400 SEAT SANCTUARY INTO FELLOWSHIP HALL FOR RECEPTION AND MEETING SPACE CAPABLE OF ACCOMMODATING 500 PEOPLE. 3. VACA n O N OF WEST 69TH STREET (THE ROAD THAT CONNECTS THE FRONTAGE ROAD TO DANBURY AND BRITTANY) TO PROVIDE ADEOUATE PARKING FOR THE EXPANSION. THIS WILL RESTRICT ACCESS TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND INCREASE TRAFFIC ON THE FRONTAGE ROAD, WEST SHORE DRIVE, WEST 70TH, WEST 66TH, BRITTANY AND DANBURY. 4. THE EXPANSION OF THE EXISTING PARKING LOT AREA SO THAT THE LOT WILL HAVE THE CAPACITY TO ACCOMMODATE IN EXCESS OF 650 CARS. 5. THE DEMOLITION OF 4 EXISTING SINGLE FAMILY HOMES AND THE DESTRUCTION OF A BEAUTIFUL VACANT GREEN SPACE ALONG WEST 69TH STREET IS NECESSARY TO ACCOMMODATE THE PARKING NEEDS. 6. A 100% EXPANSION OF THE E005TING ADMINISTRATIVE AND CLASSROOM SPACE ON THE NORTH END OF THE CHURCH STRUCTURE. �. cm -50- pjmmVID, tbu the Board aMbeam of Woad -E=5 AssadadM IM, app the of Christ PresbybMian c=rci2 fur the mowing s— - -- L Woodhill is a =ddecuol ad ood. Cb=Pik Pmod beyond im cxisft S boundaries wM t dM homes far s a -MM G=Crpdsk harnim 8The aa:ea= of the raddeazial chmz= of tux Z host Presbytmcian's nerd i wdi iaaeaa:z trait btIs m ass area ahlady bmd=d by iaaesaed tza$c ooagest ca by C0m saivicy oa France Mom= and the um of 70th Stresc as an atcay to F :anon imae100 jai aad offioc atd%* he tba E ms Ind:sstat Peck fa avast va9 I04 and Wnh of 70th Stree4 divardott of= i=M&g snommt aft do itma the adgbbadtood b0owicg *a oct cf ram mete to y 104 at 74& 9seees 3. AsraiIable aitemsdves to Ch=pfchytMi=ts =Mmi= at its Proscut lccW= tdsL At p Christ presbytgdm is VnTjjftW qty caadder these AW'"ati'res. Fat actm* the lad== Chad cite Maasar and G9M Chwds and CEE&M Dom. Oft Lt dit ava> &Wx as sat ft locadoes for Cbmt • ChMVh as ==It of hm snuch b mw can be ma° and aids y � yI gcod'anpact at s m2Deiloca iw 4, Chosc presbytmim's plan is =hM=Helaw one. The Cho& ==jgd= the need to mom if w agpedegimd. So � now. Daly m move 1ase3wiII as =t sw s6Sbhccb=d pmblmus whi6 vA s aiha nay nave. MM inane wM at as tV& if shot baked now. S. C�� f� st— the " e3>sat;L ame8my. pleas pn far a ISaX mesrsaa iii seal= and a of p spcm At lem aae sai t is io be vcated, sad 4 wM be removed from the tMc ngLI and t pkmd mkh exam c P�8 fan rL mw=Wc cWccmd= aftbc a as afthe tteodec&l chffw r clEft 8 bndmva= new iii a &miautiet3t of the vabse and gm&y of enjoyment of tbek homes 7. 7be =i od is ` a"e with a ias'p itlCitale is the msmbac ofWW fames with small abSdn= The sum in the TielSbaorhood see fire odeaatltz Goat g�sbyte�mFs at�oa w� add m rho dsrs�rs $oed by e� aed pedertdtes is t5e FajMSxEWLV= that Step =Bmum. yseddw4 ba and hm+eby is and &=Md m =premme the Aaaoaadm bars the pEmning Comm and City Coal aftbe CW of pAbm. WK and w aqvm said oppmMoo. -51- Notes CPC'S RESPONSE TO NEIGHBOR PRESENTED PROPOSED EXPANSION OVERVIEW AND BOARD OF DIRECTORS' RESOLUTION OF 6/23/97 Neighbor Presented "Christ Presbyterian Church Proposed Expansion Overview" Neighbors' Representation: "1. Construction of a new 1000 seat sanctuary. This is a 150% increase from the current sanctuary and would rank it as one of the largest sanctuaries in the Twin Cities." Response: CPC's current functional seating capacity for sanctuary events is 648. In April 1997, CPC was considering 3 preliminary sanctuary seating configurations, yielding seating capacity ranging from 1092 to 1238. The increase in worship seating capacity with the preliminary designs ranged from 69-91%, not 150% as represented by the neighbors. CPC's current design alternatives include a sanctuary with less square footage than the preliminary design and a seating capacity of 951. The increase in seating capacity for sanctuary functions would be 47% over CPC's current capacity. CPC's seating capacity in the new sanctuary would remain less than the functional seating capacity of Grace, Colonial, Our Lady of Grace, and St. Patrick's (all Edina churches), as well as many churches in Edina's immediately surrounding communities, including Wooddale, Mt. Olivet and Pax Christi. Neighbors' Representation: "2. Conversion of existing 400 seat sanctuary into fellowship hall for reception and meeting space capable of accomodating 500 people." Response: CPC proposes to convert a portion of its existing sanctuary into its main entrance hall/narthex. The west section of the floor space would be divided off for new kitchen facilities and an internal bookstore. The remaining open area would be used during peak times to facilitate better traffic flow through the building and as greeting space to foster relationships within the congregation. At other times, the area could be used for other church gatherings. Oval table seating capacity of the area would be approximately 180, not 500 as represented by the neighborhood. CPC is proposing a space under the new sanctuary that would use flexible walls to allow various configurations for classrooms and meetings. When opened to its maximum capacity for use as a new fellowship hall, it would accomodate oval table seating for 376 or rectangular table seating for 465. CPC's current fellowship hall, which accomodates oval table seating for 250 or rectangular table seating for 307, would be converted into youth meeting space. Neighbors' Representation: "3. Vacation of West 69th Street (the road that connects the Frontage Road and Danbury [sic] and Brittany) to provide adequate parking for the expansion. This will restrict access to the neighborhood and increase traffic on the Frontage Road, West Shore Drive, West 70th, West 66th, Brittany and Danbury [sic]." Response: Vacating 69th Street is only one option and not essential to CPC's proposed expansion. CPC is proposing 4 site alternatives -2 involve vacating 69th Street and 2 involve moving 69th Street (at CPC's expense) slightly to the north. One design alternative that would remove 69th Street leaves complete access to and from the neighborhood through CPC's -52- parking lot. Since many neighbors use CPC's lot regularly for easier access to and from the Highway 100/70th Street interchange, this design does not propose a significant change in access or traffic routes. Neighbors' Representation: "4. The expansion of the existing parking lot area so that the lot will have the capacity to accomodate in excess of 650 cars." Response: CPC's outdated April 1997 preliminary design would have accomodated 620 cars. The two current design alternatives that vacate 69th Street would accomodate 647 cars after completion of Phase 2. The two design alternatives that move 69th Street would accomodate 546 cars after completion of Phase 2. Neighbors' Representation: "5. The demolition of 4 existing single family homes and the destruction of a beautiful vacant green space along West 69th Street is necessary to accomodate the parking needs." Response: With or without the proposed expansion, CPC will need to add existing parking spaces to its current footprint. At the time of its 1989 expansion, CPC and the City of Edina entered a Proof of Parking Agreement that contemplated that, prior to any off -site parking expansion, CPC would remove the residence on 70th Street, immediately east of CPC main parking lot entrance, that CPC has owned since 1958. CPC also proposes to remove 3 residences north of its existing parking lot (1 on the Frontage Road and 2 on Brittany Road). CPC acquired these lots between 1994 and April of 1997, and is currently renting each of them. If CPC's expansion is not approved, CPC has no intention of selling these properties in the near future. CPC also proposes to use two vacant lots north of 69th Street which it has owned and paid taxes on since 1973. CPC has never expanded its facilities beyond the land it originally purchased in 1957. CPC's proposal to expand beyond its original site is due in large part to its growth, but also in part to the 1.3 acre reduction of its original property caused by the expansion of Highway 100. CPC's site design does not simply expand its parking space. It significantly improves the functional and aesthetic quality of the lot. For example, CPC's current lot surface contains 1% green space. The new alternatives would contain 7 -8% green space within the lot surface. The perimeter of the lot would be heavily landscaped with fairly mature plantings and its maintanence significantly improved by an irrigation system running throughout the site. Neighbors' Representation: "6. A 100% expansion of the existing administrative and classroom space on the north end of the church structure." Response: There is no building expansion to the north in Phase 1. The building portion of Phase 2 of the Master Plan (anticipated to be built 5-7 years after Phase 1) is solely administrative and classroom space. This future addition would expand CPC's current administrative and classroom space by 78 %, not 100% as represented by the neighbors. -53- NEIGHBOR PRESENTED BOARD OF DIRECTORS' RESOLUTION OF 6/23/97 Board Representation: "1. Woodhill is a residential neighborhood. Christ Presbyterian's planned expansion beyond its existing boundaries will take homes for a commercial -like enterprise, harming the essence of the residential character of the neighborhood." Response: Churches have long been acknowledged as a vital component in the lives of their communities. Rather than "harming the essence of the residential character of the neighborhood ", churches have been and are today being used as a stabilizing influence in neighborhoods. Churches are simply not "commercial -like enterprises." A church's essential purpose is to serve the spiritual, physical and emotional needs of people. The growth and multi- faceted programming of a church are indications that a church is meeting those needs. Unlike commercial enterprises, churches do not seek growth for their own profit, but rather to better minister to and serve others. Communities are increasingly looking to churches to provide services that government no longer provides. To apply commercial standards to churches or relegate them to industrial park or shopping mall settings makes it significantly more difficult for churches to reach out to their communities and does a disservice to both the churches and the public. Board Representation: "2. Christ Presbyterian's expansion and growth will increase traffic burdens in an area already burdened by increased traffic congestion caused by the following: increased commercial activity on France Avenue and the use of 70th Street as an artery to France; increased commercial and office activity in the Edina Industrial Park area west of Highway 100 and south of 70th Street; diversion of an increasing amount of traffic into the neighborhood following the installation of ramp meters to northbound Highway 100 at 70th Street." Response: The neighbors' representation appears to acknowledge that traffic increases and changes in traffic patterns over the years have been primarily caused by factors other than CPC's activities. An independent traffic study commissioned by CPC provides quantitative data that indicates that CPC's activities: 1) do not channel significant numbers of cars through the residential streets northeast of its site; 2) CPC's traffic generation on 70th Street is minimal relative to other factors effecting 70th Street; and 3) CPC's heaviest periods of traffic occur in off -peak traffic times on a street that is designed to handle heavy amounts of traffic. Board Representation: "3. Available alternatives to Christ Presbyterian's expansion at its present location exist. At present, Christ Presbyterian is unwilling to seriously consider these alternatives. For example, the Lutheran Church of the Master and Grace Church of Edina are potentially available as satellite locations for Christ Presbyterian activities, and Mt. Olivet Lutheran Church provides an example of how a much larger congregation can be managed with significantly less neighborhood impact at a smaller location." Response: Expanding CPC's facilities was not the only aftemative seriously considered by CPC, nor was it a foregone conclusion. Just because some neighbors may not like the course CPC finally decided upon does not mean that CPC has not seriously considered other possibilities. Neighbors who attended CPC's neighborhood meetings in April 1997 were clearly informed that CPC's decision to pursue an expansion followed a long- ranging planning process that started in 1993. CPC's elected governing body (the "Session") and its congregation studied, -54- discussed and prayerfully considered the following eight options for handling CPC's growth: 1) no action at this time; 2) church planting (beginning a sister church at a separate location); 3) satellite church (a second site owned and operated by CPC- -i.e., buying another church like the Lutheran Church of the Master or Grace or one in another community); 4) home churches (groups of members would rotate worshipping at CPC and in homes); 5) rent facilities off site (CPC is currently renting space at Cornelia for education classes and additional parking); 6) maximize present facility use with creative programming; 7) build at 70th and 100; and 8) build at another site (vacate CPC's present site). Session and the congregation explored and evaluated the impacts of each option on CPC's current and future ministry and the costs and benefits of each possibility. In December 1995, the Session decided that 1) CPC should stay at its current site; 2) maximize its existing facility; and 3) form a steering committee to study whether or not expanding CPC's facility would be necessary despite the maximizing strategies. Many programming and logistical changes were implemented and even more considered. CPC has reached the point where any further such changes strike against the essential character of this particular church. Some neighbors have criticized CPC for not scheduling its worship like Mt. Olivet's, but what works for one church does not necessarily work for another. Churches have different "personalities" and serve different groups of people. Today, people do not simply choose the church closest to their home, rather they "shop around" to find a church home that meets their individual worship and support needs. The scheduling of worship necessarily affects the content of worship and fellowship time. Telling CPC how to schedule its worship services essentially tells CPC's members how they may or may not worship and fellowship. Board Representation: "4. Christ Presbyterian's plan is an intermediate one. The church recognizes the need to move if growth continues as experienced. To expand now, only to move later will exacerbate neighborhood problems which will remain after any move. The issue will arise again if not halted now." Resoonse: CPC would never undertake an expansion of this expense if it had any current or foreseeable expectation of ever vacating this site. The Board has misconstrued one line in CPC's internal fundraising documents. In response to our congregation's questions of how long this expansion would meet all the needs of CPC, the literature stated that the proposed master plan (which contains everything CPC is contemplating building at this location in the foreseeable future) would "meet our needs for at least 10 years. Growth beyond this would most likely need to be off - site." CPC members have been well aware of the eight long -range planning options CPC has been considering. This statement was written for CPC members who would clearly understand the implication was that CPC may have to reconsider some of the off -site options previously considered, such as church planting, satellite churches, or renting additional facilities. Board Representation: 05. Christ Presbyterian's expansion puts it near the 'mega' church category. Plans call for a 150% increase in seating, and a doubling of parking spaces. At least one street is to be vacated, and 4 homes will be removed from the tax rolls and replaced with exempt parking lots." Response: It is diffcutt to address the Board's assertion that CPC is almost a "mega" church since that term has no measurable definition, and is simply used to convey a negative impression. CPC is one of Edina's large, healthy churches. CPC's size does afford it the resources necessary to provide its mufti - faceted programming which benefits not only its own members, but the residents of Edina and the metropolitan area. As to the exaggerated numbers -55- stated by the Board, CPC has already corrected those number in its responses to the Neighbor .Presented "Christ Presbyterian Church Building Expansion Overview" (see numbers 1,3 and 4 above). It is particularly unfair that the Board implies CPC has or may seek the vacation of even more than one street, since that is simply untrue. It is true that if CPC expands its lot, property that currently yields $2140 of city tax revenue and $7375 of school district revenue would be exempt from taxes. Board Representation: "6. Despite reasonable expectations of the continuation of the residential character of the neighborhood, adjoining landowners now face a diminuation of the value and quality of enjoyment of their homes." Response: The expansion of a church does not destroy the residential character of its neighborhood. Churches generally serve best in residential neighborhoods and attract many people to residential communities. The fear that a church expansion would diminish property values, especially in a community such as Edina, is simply unfounded. There is no quantitative data that supports this assertion. Board Representation: 7. The neighborhood is 'fuming over with large increase in the number of new families with small children. The streets in the neighborhood are the sidewalks. Christ Presbyterian's expansion will add to the dangers faced by children and pedestrians in the neighborhood." Response: CPC commissioned an independent traffic study that indicated CPC - generated traffic in the neighborhood is not significant in numbers. Increased traffic in the area is not forecasted to exceed reasonable levels for the roads surrounding CPC. Moreover, CPC has offered design alternatives that can influence traffic pattems in the area. CPC is a church. It has a great concem for children and their safety —not only from traffic hazards, but from significantly more threatening social hazards. One of CPC's purposes is to nurture the children in the neighborhood and throughout Edina. Some of the new families with small children may, indeed, be moving into the neighborhood in part due to the presence and influence of a healthy, active church in the vicinity. -56- SELECTED EDINA CHURCH COMPARISONS MEnY :s ERS "' S Q UA. W /wr. SERVICE TIMES �RK� TC ' m AVERAGE 0 OT �e�. y?,•C `rsi"Yk sF .. WORSHIP T CAPACITY,. P S ATTENDANCE i ormandale! rF 3000 = X475/650 `w 8:30/11:00 ° 150 .' 850 Rf.` � , utheragn� r . 6 '- racef� 1900 �r *1'10011500`° f 9:00/10,30/5:00 /6:30 ;610 3500 Mr Colonial � 3100 1000 9:00/10:30 675 1000 e t 4 ♦i 71'31 ��. jMN"'a2 t c S `_ - Our Lady* of�* 5400 1 *1000/1200: " Sat 5.15 � 500 3000 Grace x Sun.7:30 /9/1100 i i S =Patnck s f' 4000 1200 Sat 5:15 Sun 9/11 400 1500+ I III t °Ste �he 's„r 300 r �' 7:30/8:30/11:00 /5:00 None 500 rest 3000 "9$/648 8:15/9,:20 /10:45 3$0 1250 e m; y �r vF &v' r Lr� _L. *Where more than one number is given in the Sanctuary Capacity category, it indicates overflow capacity. CPC's overflow is used every week, at the 648 figure. V 1 Comparison of CPC's Existing Facility, The Preliminary April 1997 Master Plan And the Four January 1998 Master Plan Options Christ Presbyterian Proposal Comparison Existing April 1997 January 1998 Master Plan Conditions Master Plan Option One Option Two I Option Three I Option Four SITE 9.2 Acres Ace 6.8 Acres B. A. R 12% F. A. R. 24% Green Space 50 Feet Site 42% Parking Lot 1% Parking 350 Space Req'd Setback 9.2 Acres Parking 8.4 Acres Interior Lot Line 10 Feet Public R.O.W. 20 Feet Building 50 Feet Provided Setback 33% Parking 36% Interior Lot Line 58 Feet Public R.O.W. 20 — 110 Feet Building 46' Retaining Walls 5' Tall At East P.L. 45 L.F. BUILDING 620 Spaces Phase I- Square Feet 647 Spaces Lower Lcvel 10,050 Main Level 0% U2pSr Level Total 0% Phase 11- Squarc Feet Main Level 34.360 Upper Level 15,900 Roof Level 10,814 Total 71,124 Sanctuary Seating Main Floor 446 150 Fireside F Balcony 52 Choir Lor 9.2 Acres 9.2 Acres 9.2 Acres 8.4 Acres 8.4 Acres 15% 14% 14% 15% 15% 34% 33% 33% 36% 360/9 28% 29.5% 29.5% 31.5% 31.5% 7% 7% 7% 8%. 8% 620 Spaces 647 Spaces 647 Spaces 529 Spaces 529 Soact 10 Feet 20 Fect 50 Feet 10 Feet 20 Feet 50 Feet 10 — 20 Feet 20 — 28 Feet at East Boundary. 15 — 30 Feet at North Boundary 20 - 45 Feet. 20 Feet at West Boundary. 24 -28 Feet at South Boundary 58' 67' 4'-8' Tall 2'- 6 " -3'-6" Tall 1080 L.F. 320 Linear Feet Total 648 1,092 - 1.238 951 *Height in Feet % Change From Ridge 41' 60'-6" 58' Mid Point of Ridgc 34' April 1997 Master Plan 14,400 138' -6" 136' 12,450 -14% 14,400 12,450 -14% 6,600 6,380 -3% 35,400 31,280 -12% 9,780 9,780 0% 9,780 9,780 0% 9,120 9,120 0% 28,680 28,680 0% 752- 898 648 -28% Total 648 1,092 - 1.238 951 *Height in Feet Ridge 41' 60'-6" 58' Mid Point of Ridgc 34' 45' -3" 44' Steeple 98' 138' -6" 136' *Heights are measured from the main entrance grade elevation -11ie -13 %- -23% -58- Notes 1998 CHRIST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH PROPOSED MASTER PLAN DRAWING OVERVIEW The following design drawings outline Christ Presbyterian Church's planned two phase expansion. Phase one includes a new fellowship hall and associated support spaces at the lower level (12, 450 s.f.), new sanctuary at the main level (12,450 s.f.), new balcony above the sanctuary at the upper level (6,380 s.f.), and a remodeling of the existing sanctuary into a new Narthex and support spaces. Phase two consists of mechanical and storage spaces at the lower level (9,780 s.f.); new offices, library, and classrooms at the main level (9,780 s.f.), and a new counseling center and classrooms at the upper level (9,120 s.f.). The architectural expansion of the expression reinforces the existing colonial character of the building. Both additions will match existing exterior materials such as brick, shingles, windows, dormers, etc. The simple but strong forms and details will enhance the church's position as a landmark within the community and neighborhood. In addition to the building expansion, the parking lot is reorganized with expansion to the north — including a vacated 69's street. The access to 70`h street has been moved as far east as possible and is designed to allow the maximum car stacking and easy access in and out of the church property. In all of the four site plan options the layout of the parking lot is essentially the same with the exception being to the north area treatment. The four options for consideration are as follows: Option 1. A 647 -space parking lot, with an eliminated 69th street, that facilitates easy movement in and out of the neighborhood. Option 2. Also 647 spaces, but traffic is not allowed to move between the church parkin lot and the neighborhood, except for emergency vehicles. This plan also eliminates 69 street. Option 3. A 546 -space parking lot, with a relocated 69th street, moved to the church's north boundary. A 50' right -of -way is provided with a 24' wide street that the church would build and then turn over to the city. Access is provided between the new parking lot and the neighborhood via the relocated 69th street. Option 4. This option is identical to option #3 with one exception — the elimination of the driveway from the parking lot to 69th street. This would minimize any traffic between the church and the neighborhood. We have included site plans, landscape plans, and civil engineering plans for all four options. The landscaping provides a thick border of 12' - 14' spruce trees at the east and north property lines, providing attractive screening of the parking lot from the neighbors. Landscaped islands have been introduced into the parking lot to create pods or smaller parking areas to minimize the impact of the entire parking area. Lighting has been added to the parking lot as well, but kept to a 19' — 6" pole height and a fixture selected to eliminate any direct glare to surrounding homes. RE r msrw.. ENTRAnCC AND REPLACE COM t- o W (00, W HIMIN r1 ) ( %" ® I6E��v17 L 0 N 3 i I I P, srg ffl,a�y evENr ttW.Gf — EVENT 61GMAG! . _ —'_'� N61 t7RRT : tj . . . . .. Et4;— A - ,J; -U /\ =L�NO.RMANDALE tO t � t 4,teLa m RA, m L toter u tmo ,m a s Rac toe,etto r eotm a tv RAc t Ra tau, w,s I,aerrt tw t n on aa.eu m u.nc tLrl 1 - qaa .Ie I- I m smDs FIB' I I Lone aeLs 1Of ADDITI ..a —ppWsC II I `ttm. tra — ' m tRla.601 t N; eTS 5a � I i 11328 SF. - i 1 i i -- -• -•- i HEW LOT wo Bib• ■ ►39'V it37.B S.F. I I \ NEW TDT - ' tcs era - ' , � RE,rOVC El,W6 STRCET AµN D MST.N CORM D REVILE CYR65 tnw tcm n emru o uw m. Rotr. IA,M name <. a uu n m .Rneawa rtm.nKUnme u.eA,o ..r.e.n■ Run tom a twt �a rlro n ttoaoe nec 11.RI\ mns 4aA a ti IA. tLgle<}R neRC tRRL ■ tucrim rN r.n vra nm s ro • n teyaltm, taw.a'a p u aom tl.q tmOluq 0r.'A �,os a a oam tRASe q au tawera ao remnm m Lo roe rose ti m gglt Ei0 a • tRa,n errs is rrs ,man IUr ®a n OnY ®ts M.In u m r aRNm,m ®a t mlu®o ul.,n rrru,o 111.1 ll.q W4.IRw rDIr.BI4,p. nr410 O Y n,leOe Y<ln a r .On. la RtP.a tetl aRYe ®,s ,m a tt01Rr tql ntn RelrE Rrn m YC R IIRn ttmalut ro m wr r a s vL.n tars ■ Ln.o n lol m Inourt6r rn m ReKAreiA NO .s— .I JA PPARK" DICAP STOP ' _ it ..<..a i�� ��T� TIE-1 I QgMP N T.+E 9�DEruIK WT,P M T.IE 510EwL ___41 -- _}} }�4,J� i , - -;' I � III' r1GONCRETE GURB r1CONGRETE SIDEWALK NOT TO SCALE n ADP RAMP DETAIL WAN I AP RAMP DETAIL nNANGA GnIGN 'CT TO SALE M ALE nSTOP SIGN YALE s U L S V C 41 0 'L u c x N L c I� W N V `TtR�+tiitT� Tushit Montgomery Associates Inc. 7300 Esroe.a„o Wey. •601 AtioaM.f.• Alivetet0 55475 612- 630-6206 FAX: 630.6215 ro.tL<,Ir. ro <.vera.e <eEeLaa emErr� r.. o, n Ira ,.eaa .R,m, min .o.n e. .Kea. t•.:ucK rR..[.. SITE RAN Ae.n By P,ele<t M<,il.<I TY Coec.ea By TL.GT Dot. 5.16 -N - Re.b�an. • .taL.a .mute e eTeeY LQ to ra. e4t �• 'i c na f7O" L1.1 \ / RCTAMING VIAL {� .OR Ge 6[L CMt t MAP-15 AIU JN I I I i — EVENT 61GMAG! . _ —'_'� N61 t7RRT : tj . . . . .. Et4;— A - ,J; -U /\ =L�NO.RMANDALE tO t � t 4,teLa m RA, m L toter u tmo ,m a s Rac toe,etto r eotm a tv RAc t Ra tau, w,s I,aerrt tw t n on aa.eu m u.nc tLrl 1 - qaa .Ie I- I m smDs FIB' I I Lone aeLs 1Of ADDITI ..a —ppWsC II I `ttm. tra — ' m tRla.601 t N; eTS 5a � I i 11328 SF. - i 1 i i -- -• -•- i HEW LOT wo Bib• ■ ►39'V it37.B S.F. I I \ NEW TDT - ' tcs era - ' , � RE,rOVC El,W6 STRCET AµN D MST.N CORM D REVILE CYR65 tnw tcm n emru o uw m. Rotr. IA,M name <. a uu n m .Rneawa rtm.nKUnme u.eA,o ..r.e.n■ Run tom a twt �a rlro n ttoaoe nec 11.RI\ mns 4aA a ti IA. tLgle<}R neRC tRRL ■ tucrim rN r.n vra nm s ro • n teyaltm, taw.a'a p u aom tl.q tmOluq 0r.'A �,os a a oam tRASe q au tawera ao remnm m Lo roe rose ti m gglt Ei0 a • tRa,n errs is rrs ,man IUr ®a n OnY ®ts M.In u m r aRNm,m ®a t mlu®o ul.,n rrru,o 111.1 ll.q W4.IRw rDIr.BI4,p. nr410 O Y n,leOe Y<ln a r .On. la RtP.a tetl aRYe ®,s ,m a tt01Rr tql ntn RelrE Rrn m YC R IIRn ttmalut ro m wr r a s vL.n tars ■ Ln.o n lol m Inourt6r rn m ReKAreiA NO .s— .I JA PPARK" DICAP STOP ' _ it ..<..a i�� ��T� TIE-1 I QgMP N T.+E 9�DEruIK WT,P M T.IE 510EwL ___41 -- _}} }�4,J� i , - -;' I � III' r1GONCRETE GURB r1CONGRETE SIDEWALK NOT TO SCALE n ADP RAMP DETAIL WAN I AP RAMP DETAIL nNANGA GnIGN 'CT TO SALE M ALE nSTOP SIGN YALE s U L S V C 41 0 'L u c x N L c I� W N V `TtR�+tiitT� Tushit Montgomery Associates Inc. 7300 Esroe.a„o Wey. •601 AtioaM.f.• Alivetet0 55475 612- 630-6206 FAX: 630.6215 ro.tL<,Ir. ro <.vera.e <eEeLaa emErr� r.. o, n Ira ,.eaa .R,m, min .o.n e. .Kea. t•.:ucK rR..[.. SITE RAN Ae.n By P,ele<t M<,il.<I TY Coec.ea By TL.GT Dot. 5.16 -N - Re.b�an. • .taL.a .mute e eTeeY LQ to ra. e4t �• 'i c na f7O" L1.1 LU L O N 3 ROAD NORMANOALE u Q ■ A MINE a �e I� fp.Glpl1. T4E[. RUBBER LOSI 1 FLU ..IT.. IAVING GUT NIKES (E) y RIVER ROCK Al FILTER F SOD ACROSS SLOPE NOT _R' +RAP 1 OLIN SLOPE STEEL POST A' MULCU BE -ILCN ENTIR _.EP) < sm.. uA PLASTIC EDGE MULLS (.' DEEP) REMOVE Bu4M TOP .AD I . peo %] FRP+yTOP . �) 1) M SEE C+ DET�L EMOIIE \` \ SPECIFI'_D SnWND OF CSO.L FINIY GRADEJ F _ TO SUPPORT STA[ _ 1— GRADE COI P. ED S—RADE COMPACTED SuBGR�9E' SPL •'oXTURE — d NOTE, SI PI _ - NOTE nVL4. LATER TO _ STAGGER SO 'J SO SEAMS DO SOIL M :OVER ENTIRE BED OT LINE 19 BASED ON SUET IXTU I ] SOD Oa_� D'STURSED AREAS R-VVAR- '10\G PO.1- -C T -A5..0_75 2 TREE PLANTING DETAIL r1EDIG OF ml 11 ru DETAIL SHRUB BED DETAIL / 500 1 DETAIL `lO 5CALE � SCA_E L 1.i SCA_E b XA_= S V L S V a C 4J o N L U c 4J c L W L S V `Trwi►- Tushie Montgomery .'r SOCi0te5 Inc. ti 3300 E6roero.0 NNo,. •601 Z00" . Abr 111 55433 612- 63o.62o6 (A[+630-62+3 WITCHER `viff [C+Y14 1.R oRL.w al.a .mr[a:¢Er�R rRNi +re°o. w�rrtcR�.i� !��. Y[t�AY[�/t. //4��Y��M //0. �VG...• K PL" Dr.— 6, vroiecl wc� 1 T1[ C.[[ 6, TL. CT 0.1. Re.'�uona • .e+Up .Or RI 4] aweo .s ro [.� �aa e62ar L2.5 ' 1 ST. S. CB LU-) t TOP v 670.6 INY. 867.1 1B 2 ST. S. CB ' TOP INV. _ 666.99 TTUPow1RY ROCK ENTiiANCE REPLACE TOPS OF EX. CATCH BASINS W/ NEENAN R -1733 W/ TYPE C RADIAL GRATE. w TfJNJ♦ 3 ST. S. YX 1yE TOP - 875.0 To 861.. I INV. = 866.56 TOP _ 661.5 5 J Taez3 YH 58. B ST. S. TOP eenet Q 1 1. O 1.0075 Z T 1 4 Nu TOP- 70.8 87L - TOP 1.1- INV. .883.4 TOP $70.5 ■ CONNECT TO O IHV, a 868.t7n lam. COST. ST. S. Z HV. 4152 -3 ay. 855.5 5 1 CATCH BASIN Wv. P6IRUCT NEW ►0/ EXIST. 15' $T. S. V. m um 7 - c E �•� T e w TOP 17 V. f% ADJ UST TOP OF Wv. road EX. SAN. $. YH Q 113 -2 NEW TOP - 871.0 NEW TOP - 852.2 & & slave /T . 11113 W Wv. 64 .3 YS�v REPLACE TOPS OF EX. CATCH BASINS W/ NEENAN R -1733 W/ TYPE C RADIAL GRATE. DATE ar U.arn T1a u.S ar trE =*M fI YIR60TA I COµO r P-rD[_ PL I OAIE m /micro Kc. W. 11]]4 as - 054 SIR 89054EO1.DWG AP 3/4- WATER SERVICES 0 EXISTING WATEHWIN, CONNECT NEW 4- SAN. S. TO EXISTING SAN. S. YH. ]4 4410. 175 $73.59 IFE 81170 IYI 3 STORY EXISTING BUILDING &1a:]LL Fr[ WZ63 1 �T . 7�N Taal! ' 1 PON fife' 1: Ll T d w J Li I EXIST. EXIST. WLt IX. SAN. S. I'M NEW TOP _ 872.5 TOP 873.0 INV. 864.16 Q 9 ST. S. CB TOP = 866.0 INV. - 863.0 F" 27• DIAMETER ADJUST VALVE 00) 10 ST. S. CB TOP - 868.6 \'. INV. - '63.11 Nv 579. 7 TOP v 866.3 INV. - 861.41 1 - s7e e - 41763 T - 073 ` 12 ST. S. CB e - e74S/ a TOP - 863.5 p- INV. - 858.96 i Si0R7 I nN¢ �T - 1175\ e.en en.7 TOP . 861.1 TRY, v 854.81 nr ,4 $7. � GB TOP - 658.7 INV. 850.66 1.1167 3 . ee4.0 T -1167 e - auS Fn &n.7 ,(1 884 \ 6 -aeo.5 ■9- a2 :o.7.111LEf� I ��t ®� ► L�, 7i, #Itj/ C EN E Ref N01 ES: 1. Eira4 Irorrnem7. leer:m, rrp -Pxk. sN tlaM1 Ir.rmaNn a=r r Uk Plm r Iran s a.4•I h Nvnwr flrsrp P7" 0-- m1m ) /S /9T. 2. I1- r.tlkr a annln re-- sn amroa -w .nf, ana .LSCr m eea C 1-800M WATT Z 1 ONE CALL tl 4!4-011111 in m- maro e. _kIl d" -11N mR Iti I.r •rtl rPrkM tl r.a :e -o•Yne 11.7 rya.- Man - -dnnip -rI nwdrYClYn. 1 M Pr.P.m. •..t rwaar Trot an 1- e.tmin r cure .nta aMrau IIr.IC.tM 4. Iwlrm w tsM1 ...>. .«•rmm- .mr Y• co .r Ea 1 C.-` e.nflI m M ail? NrlPle- Y 95% S- Pr«ta rTmimvm a7 ..I-q (ASTU o69e -711 .r AASNIo T -w) Iron w ar -.n m Allan 3 IM r w proms •urloo and 100% St.nmro Pr «Ir mmimulll 4ry .-Mi7 m Ir. nrr 3 1mt. 1r..+.... -6t7 1-a. k -Wk .rr mr Pk.e. emmin fmOnpA r.OA end Pa.Nenb. N kml ane mneetlkn Ia-1 a I-.uir d •wry Im IM r rrm a wnkr In1-wm .a ®.mq tr fmL e. TT-Wr m. [pI-e r � q«rwelr. 7. RC 0-Mo rarew rwly cwe. S 1 0 0 v SEVER N 0 1 ES: I- UNr- arn+r Irr01f.I•A .-- • rl .lPr-ty (u.) a--ma rehd al cv.vr. tlrvebrc• .n r rOrin .w•r eatelWmr.a ]. U.• c x..nm R -1733 Nan .Im fry. 'I.' realtl prey Oea.r. eeltl, m m are& W.;Is Ur .l--I -n R- 5067 -DVM -.Wq .P•.w4 -.Ild, m r mta eery a aIe I«pl'er. 1 h IM ma tnn. Trine a .0 d.14r•. RCP &n . mwarun a Ye t.r-W V ..N Ie.Yrn mr junL MNk ra. r -II ..%. b Mn .. Y-an - .om t- P;P- W.I. Ara . r.w trnn w.a m e.roe era rrkr > .a.r Ia r - wrw IT- 1r m .;em-ta. .. Rei -an. cvrmb pe ap ryl'rga PIIr mnlsrw b w r..uimr.- r tM SA5- c S".W. c Cmrnl• swr Rr. em cm" .W. PL cry O-rpn a rin Nader w'ndordwp la be mw a ar reed:&.. Ure-. .uNwke -.ed0ed. rrremed mIrc-Ie rwr Pw an..nd -.c11elr .nr Iw a trn A-4 mrere nde« b'-Hnp gwe•t p:rl mrlrlNt•. n ASW C351 -65T, .dry 6mru.m e.a.smneM1 r reel a YNOOT Staer. Plem r. 3004. 1M pa4r aad m o=Pda b rP. b r t«N.a rNd w a.n s inn Wan j«•:p Pr. E R O S 1 0 N C 0 N 1 R O L N 0 T E S: 1. b d.0 •R Iro_r_w R maw, w w PI - Pd« b T Imr W! /•r Mp PPOdIp prpa4 A«na Na Y$ le�ea lebI' m . T- Ta k.a IT man ma N. a iewr r «) .up N IM Ierr- Tee a w ewmn «a. Ln w I.W. r w Uma IN<uN mM mmmel I..M erw rlke- r w To a . Tae Prl N rc.e, rate w 1.mk a t•rt a ird_.. fold 4 aw, OM -r.-v Irlar 4 le try• fmn Pe•t. SN I- Par. Par. -red >Fm •..-•- m krya .r... -.. aa1.a. I- U -- Ww tier "I T- U -rrrn arl P.r- -rra .rya mt - 1- 1.0 m W u'-a fmL P-a, -I INw . r.Mr•--n krrpm a 30 Ina... P. eafr m.Y. G•Ianb Ie«b -Ndl mnt m. rr.xalrN- a NNOOT Ston4.r. SP-tlbtlbn 3733 Taw 1 Irurll.lr -d m . asrliluar r.6 H -ra Y mad -Pk III/�/� Itl`V TOP 851.4 ELO 7I� IW. 1347.05 ® ++ �- SCALE IN FEET -e - - - - - --I 2. nmrw M Yme.r.ry •wwtk, arvcex.L w. mmlaa.4re.aer •turn mN emirrd eenvr m-kr rla 1 Bron 0�pwr�ny rNClnl. +ctrl R1PoIWfY R001 C016fRUCfON UIIRYfCC r cvcn Pb oil w &met -`IV - w. U. 1 Y 2 dm -n •Ia+r m WOOF G -1 a YNmT G -2 c..rw oggmMe. Raw IM . -TIM. M . ara� a rva 6 exM YkY ov.r In• .nr a !0 0 1n 111 u. [dena w r.e .eN. m Tor Irl Yd. w e- n-IrllalN tort. Uw . rar0r Imr;. areal w opp..p -I. i. a.a b a•..v - �f•a;an a -e] :It- w ..a Irerrt Prw. .. In-1 a $LOCK e-u ROCK smwmT nLtER m .1 mlPro.:n :nNY .la r«rr. r1.e11 fran ONlur.rtl Yn am. gb[e m. RePA e4c1 wkn .Dula a epsrr -mre rv�v.Y rMrrwl. .qP«•1� -mM. Levvn.(oS' PPen^pf)...s .mrNa ns Ran mmaa7 r«r pllwk• On wk •1..- ...-tl w adlea.ir Ira. R «. P.- inr.ly b tM I.o a w Y«e m-riv Mm w ..cx i- gOCr. IM -n-m aN l0 aewnl q- r.0r from nip rmm tm.wn tM I. .. R«. r.a opaxM tM aw nnM b w tm a tM U. t to ] relr Sanaa r..l ra .. Yxml G -1, I. CA G -], r u -] rm.. epp.epw. Ya.e tr .ww. a e• eka- b a.da b lean . m.Ha Ir6pN of fe'. s. R.m.w a w2• m. e•rmwe vwm - rnN.:. meerir m.pewMa •rm Rmla..l rw r m a m;M m.- .. a b- er.ttm a tM eerw rNn, amn mwa •maw . gewNp w r- 4. gp. SYaal rrVrp r rr.r .H7 reef f-mne4 nn A eMrrlp r •.wPirq. PI.n . 15' thilb W- r YR ' Sl.m -. 5•r$I4Nm 3601.7A Ckr ■ r enl.. 73' mkE 107fIn a YrO01 Sbmem SNC01mU -1 Se0129 pronlmr fryer PINT 1 1..811-- rrcatm N b. PI.n r .c4.rmnc- Ton Yx00T SbMeN SP «U;nLm 7511. 0--twti rd- aNr moP a w W a WOO? rSi P a W. hrtl eetl e I Ncw M1 e Y da E. gm Ra t. n 7m Ir w w, r 0.-. rw .1 n k.. gM r 'c . {ed. 11' c II.Ia, w Irnllrarm OWIrb/ a dpreP ar Imr etma -1 mrl M n0 IA wry Y.1 neulrr let 12' .Nmaa qp4: 7. P•rlerm a .Tor -n eaarr aiYlm b e®.ew .an q. - .Ilra. nta.d N to swt ma.p.na. Pmcllcw +armmr: 7roYCOp raa m-Plr . u.r4 A...ti• w.f.Me q IM Irnlnrb Pmnkn Cmxr Aem r. Ym"To mrm9- .timer h Ma .INf./ mwp•InW tern alter IM more ao}cl Pm InOepvN 111- amNrlloti f. caetrw a raP..r .'weer an finer -r rm.ip 3:1 (3 no✓ . b 1 VenieO. STONWATER 1W0ME2ET AREA Teal TYLa-7 0r-N". br . 7.01 «rr - O.Otla Ins oeli" SI.Im - 4$ 24r-, IPm W. 20 -w X ent 1pn ft t . &1114 m -m Ua sw- vavme Yan.. 0.'37 .... -n. 100 -YR Pm -o . Okm.fp• Iran P"' - 33.40 d• 100 -TIM Pry- O- roml•r a•mar - N.q1 d. N o $�LE loo' x Tar 1 �er-rr .f 1y OFF SITE PONDING DETAIL ATE REVISION CHRIST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH 0/117 ORIPNN PiAH MR V'8/97 else.. Pmo fEMS EDINA, MINNESOTA I/1f 07 QN16. POxO /4 /pe Si0PY1W1[A Ya-r SITE .IeY s /ve NLW sITE PLAN I Sand4e EngBne�r9ng� Inc. ./2 /fe w PACfux 4200 OM aN 5M-mr for. sun• 230 bmlr -pI 16.Ie-eb 3l4J7 Ie12� eel -]]u GRADING AND C1 UTILITY PLAN 1 of w TfJNJ♦ Top eu.s 1 > To 861.. I I21ItP TOP _ 661.5 5 J Taez3 58. J T Q 1 1. Z T Tame 1.1- O T 3 CONNECT TO O COST. ST. S. Z HV. 4152 -3 CATCH BASIN Z H IVY. - 853.0 e P e .6 ADJUST MP OF EXIST. SAN. S. YH NEW TOP - 852.2 & & Ta542 /T . 11113 W Wv. 64 .3 0 - 11511 tads 6 SkT FENCE fcesze /f 18 . 6482 12• H.D.P.E ST. S. r O 1.477E rCOOt fi ST. S. CB TOP - 845.5 MV. - 842.32 T TT44e.] S. O 1.477E W W Ae47S CONNECT 70 E%ISIING ST. S. CATCH BASIN , INV. _ 841.0 , wP�-1 T w TOP - 852.5 tINV. - - 846.75 1 11•!.7 NE71mv ISRItiY Irw a, m 06 I, O Twe.o REGISTERED M Les c r' as - 054 SIR 89054EO1.DWG AP 3/4- WATER SERVICES 0 EXISTING WATEHWIN, CONNECT NEW 4- SAN. S. TO EXISTING SAN. S. YH. ]4 4410. 175 $73.59 IFE 81170 IYI 3 STORY EXISTING BUILDING &1a:]LL Fr[ WZ63 1 �T . 7�N Taal! ' 1 PON fife' 1: Ll T d w J Li I EXIST. EXIST. WLt IX. SAN. S. I'M NEW TOP _ 872.5 TOP 873.0 INV. 864.16 Q 9 ST. S. CB TOP = 866.0 INV. - 863.0 F" 27• DIAMETER ADJUST VALVE 00) 10 ST. S. CB TOP - 868.6 \'. INV. - '63.11 Nv 579. 7 TOP v 866.3 INV. - 861.41 1 - s7e e - 41763 T - 073 ` 12 ST. S. CB e - e74S/ a TOP - 863.5 p- INV. - 858.96 i Si0R7 I nN¢ �T - 1175\ e.en en.7 TOP . 861.1 TRY, v 854.81 nr ,4 $7. � GB TOP - 658.7 INV. 850.66 1.1167 3 . ee4.0 T -1167 e - auS Fn &n.7 ,(1 884 \ 6 -aeo.5 ■9- a2 :o.7.111LEf� I ��t ®� ► L�, 7i, #Itj/ C EN E Ref N01 ES: 1. Eira4 Irorrnem7. leer:m, rrp -Pxk. sN tlaM1 Ir.rmaNn a=r r Uk Plm r Iran s a.4•I h Nvnwr flrsrp P7" 0-- m1m ) /S /9T. 2. I1- r.tlkr a annln re-- sn amroa -w .nf, ana .LSCr m eea C 1-800M WATT Z 1 ONE CALL tl 4!4-011111 in m- maro e. _kIl d" -11N mR Iti I.r •rtl rPrkM tl r.a :e -o•Yne 11.7 rya.- Man - -dnnip -rI nwdrYClYn. 1 M Pr.P.m. •..t rwaar Trot an 1- e.tmin r cure .nta aMrau IIr.IC.tM 4. Iwlrm w tsM1 ...>. .«•rmm- .mr Y• co .r Ea 1 C.-` e.nflI m M ail? NrlPle- Y 95% S- Pr«ta rTmimvm a7 ..I-q (ASTU o69e -711 .r AASNIo T -w) Iron w ar -.n m Allan 3 IM r w proms •urloo and 100% St.nmro Pr «Ir mmimulll 4ry .-Mi7 m Ir. nrr 3 1mt. 1r..+.... -6t7 1-a. k -Wk .rr mr Pk.e. emmin fmOnpA r.OA end Pa.Nenb. N kml ane mneetlkn Ia-1 a I-.uir d •wry Im IM r rrm a wnkr In1-wm .a ®.mq tr fmL e. TT-Wr m. [pI-e r � q«rwelr. 7. RC 0-Mo rarew rwly cwe. S 1 0 0 v SEVER N 0 1 ES: I- UNr- arn+r Irr01f.I•A .-- • rl .lPr-ty (u.) a--ma rehd al cv.vr. tlrvebrc• .n r rOrin .w•r eatelWmr.a ]. U.• c x..nm R -1733 Nan .Im fry. 'I.' realtl prey Oea.r. eeltl, m m are& W.;Is Ur .l--I -n R- 5067 -DVM -.Wq .P•.w4 -.Ild, m r mta eery a aIe I«pl'er. 1 h IM ma tnn. Trine a .0 d.14r•. RCP &n . mwarun a Ye t.r-W V ..N Ie.Yrn mr junL MNk ra. r -II ..%. b Mn .. Y-an - .om t- P;P- W.I. Ara . r.w trnn w.a m e.roe era rrkr > .a.r Ia r - wrw IT- 1r m .;em-ta. .. Rei -an. cvrmb pe ap ryl'rga PIIr mnlsrw b w r..uimr.- r tM SA5- c S".W. c Cmrnl• swr Rr. em cm" .W. PL cry O-rpn a rin Nader w'ndordwp la be mw a ar reed:&.. Ure-. .uNwke -.ed0ed. rrremed mIrc-Ie rwr Pw an..nd -.c11elr .nr Iw a trn A-4 mrere nde« b'-Hnp gwe•t p:rl mrlrlNt•. n ASW C351 -65T, .dry 6mru.m e.a.smneM1 r reel a YNOOT Staer. Plem r. 3004. 1M pa4r aad m o=Pda b rP. b r t«N.a rNd w a.n s inn Wan j«•:p Pr. E R O S 1 0 N C 0 N 1 R O L N 0 T E S: 1. b d.0 •R Iro_r_w R maw, w w PI - Pd« b T Imr W! /•r Mp PPOdIp prpa4 A«na Na Y$ le�ea lebI' m . T- Ta k.a IT man ma N. a iewr r «) .up N IM Ierr- Tee a w ewmn «a. Ln w I.W. r w Uma IN<uN mM mmmel I..M erw rlke- r w To a . Tae Prl N rc.e, rate w 1.mk a t•rt a ird_.. fold 4 aw, OM -r.-v Irlar 4 le try• fmn Pe•t. SN I- Par. Par. -red >Fm •..-•- m krya .r... -.. aa1.a. I- U -- Ww tier "I T- U -rrrn arl P.r- -rra .rya mt - 1- 1.0 m W u'-a fmL P-a, -I INw . r.Mr•--n krrpm a 30 Ina... P. eafr m.Y. G•Ianb Ie«b -Ndl mnt m. rr.xalrN- a NNOOT Ston4.r. SP-tlbtlbn 3733 Taw 1 Irurll.lr -d m . asrliluar r.6 H -ra Y mad -Pk III/�/� Itl`V TOP 851.4 ELO 7I� IW. 1347.05 ® ++ �- SCALE IN FEET -e - - - - - --I 2. nmrw M Yme.r.ry •wwtk, arvcex.L w. mmlaa.4re.aer •turn mN emirrd eenvr m-kr rla 1 Bron 0�pwr�ny rNClnl. +ctrl R1PoIWfY R001 C016fRUCfON UIIRYfCC r cvcn Pb oil w &met -`IV - w. U. 1 Y 2 dm -n •Ia+r m WOOF G -1 a YNmT G -2 c..rw oggmMe. Raw IM . -TIM. M . ara� a rva 6 exM YkY ov.r In• .nr a !0 0 1n 111 u. [dena w r.e .eN. m Tor Irl Yd. w e- n-IrllalN tort. Uw . rar0r Imr;. areal w opp..p -I. i. a.a b a•..v - �f•a;an a -e] :It- w ..a Irerrt Prw. .. In-1 a $LOCK e-u ROCK smwmT nLtER m .1 mlPro.:n :nNY .la r«rr. r1.e11 fran ONlur.rtl Yn am. gb[e m. RePA e4c1 wkn .Dula a epsrr -mre rv�v.Y rMrrwl. .qP«•1� -mM. Levvn.(oS' PPen^pf)...s .mrNa ns Ran mmaa7 r«r pllwk• On wk •1..- ...-tl w adlea.ir Ira. R «. P.- inr.ly b tM I.o a w Y«e m-riv Mm w ..cx i- gOCr. IM -n-m aN l0 aewnl q- r.0r from nip rmm tm.wn tM I. .. R«. r.a opaxM tM aw nnM b w tm a tM U. t to ] relr Sanaa r..l ra .. Yxml G -1, I. CA G -], r u -] rm.. epp.epw. Ya.e tr .ww. a e• eka- b a.da b lean . m.Ha Ir6pN of fe'. s. R.m.w a w2• m. e•rmwe vwm - rnN.:. meerir m.pewMa •rm Rmla..l rw r m a m;M m.- .. a b- er.ttm a tM eerw rNn, amn mwa •maw . gewNp w r- 4. gp. SYaal rrVrp r rr.r .H7 reef f-mne4 nn A eMrrlp r •.wPirq. PI.n . 15' thilb W- r YR ' Sl.m -. 5•r$I4Nm 3601.7A Ckr ■ r enl.. 73' mkE 107fIn a YrO01 Sbmem SNC01mU -1 Se0129 pronlmr fryer PINT 1 1..811-- rrcatm N b. PI.n r .c4.rmnc- Ton Yx00T SbMeN SP «U;nLm 7511. 0--twti rd- aNr moP a w W a WOO? rSi P a W. hrtl eetl e I Ncw M1 e Y da E. gm Ra t. n 7m Ir w w, r 0.-. rw .1 n k.. gM r 'c . {ed. 11' c II.Ia, w Irnllrarm OWIrb/ a dpreP ar Imr etma -1 mrl M n0 IA wry Y.1 neulrr let 12' .Nmaa qp4: 7. P•rlerm a .Tor -n eaarr aiYlm b e®.ew .an q. - .Ilra. nta.d N to swt ma.p.na. Pmcllcw +armmr: 7roYCOp raa m-Plr . u.r4 A...ti• w.f.Me q IM Irnlnrb Pmnkn Cmxr Aem r. Ym"To mrm9- .timer h Ma .INf./ mwp•InW tern alter IM more ao}cl Pm InOepvN 111- amNrlloti f. caetrw a raP..r .'weer an finer -r rm.ip 3:1 (3 no✓ . b 1 VenieO. STONWATER 1W0ME2ET AREA Teal TYLa-7 0r-N". br . 7.01 «rr - O.Otla Ins oeli" SI.Im - 4$ 24r-, IPm W. 20 -w X ent 1pn ft t . &1114 m -m Ua sw- vavme Yan.. 0.'37 .... -n. 100 -YR Pm -o . Okm.fp• Iran P"' - 33.40 d• 100 -TIM Pry- O- roml•r a•mar - N.q1 d. N o $�LE loo' x Tar 1 �er-rr .f 1y OFF SITE PONDING DETAIL ATE REVISION CHRIST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH 0/117 ORIPNN PiAH MR V'8/97 else.. Pmo fEMS EDINA, MINNESOTA I/1f 07 QN16. POxO /4 /pe Si0PY1W1[A Ya-r SITE .IeY s /ve NLW sITE PLAN I Sand4e EngBne�r9ng� Inc. ./2 /fe w PACfux 4200 OM aN 5M-mr for. sun• 230 bmlr -pI 16.Ie-eb 3l4J7 Ie12� eel -]]u GRADING AND C1 UTILITY PLAN 1 of Taal! ' 1 PON fife' 1: Ll T d w J Li I EXIST. EXIST. WLt IX. SAN. S. I'M NEW TOP _ 872.5 TOP 873.0 INV. 864.16 Q 9 ST. S. CB TOP = 866.0 INV. - 863.0 F" 27• DIAMETER ADJUST VALVE 00) 10 ST. S. CB TOP - 868.6 \'. INV. - '63.11 Nv 579. 7 TOP v 866.3 INV. - 861.41 1 - s7e e - 41763 T - 073 ` 12 ST. S. CB e - e74S/ a TOP - 863.5 p- INV. - 858.96 i Si0R7 I nN¢ �T - 1175\ e.en en.7 TOP . 861.1 TRY, v 854.81 nr ,4 $7. � GB TOP - 658.7 INV. 850.66 1.1167 3 . ee4.0 T -1167 e - auS Fn &n.7 ,(1 884 \ 6 -aeo.5 ■9- a2 :o.7.111LEf� I ��t ®� ► L�, 7i, #Itj/ C EN E Ref N01 ES: 1. Eira4 Irorrnem7. leer:m, rrp -Pxk. sN tlaM1 Ir.rmaNn a=r r Uk Plm r Iran s a.4•I h Nvnwr flrsrp P7" 0-- m1m ) /S /9T. 2. I1- r.tlkr a annln re-- sn amroa -w .nf, ana .LSCr m eea C 1-800M WATT Z 1 ONE CALL tl 4!4-011111 in m- maro e. _kIl d" -11N mR Iti I.r •rtl rPrkM tl r.a :e -o•Yne 11.7 rya.- Man - -dnnip -rI nwdrYClYn. 1 M Pr.P.m. •..t rwaar Trot an 1- e.tmin r cure .nta aMrau IIr.IC.tM 4. Iwlrm w tsM1 ...>. .«•rmm- .mr Y• co .r Ea 1 C.-` e.nflI m M ail? NrlPle- Y 95% S- Pr«ta rTmimvm a7 ..I-q (ASTU o69e -711 .r AASNIo T -w) Iron w ar -.n m Allan 3 IM r w proms •urloo and 100% St.nmro Pr «Ir mmimulll 4ry .-Mi7 m Ir. nrr 3 1mt. 1r..+.... -6t7 1-a. k -Wk .rr mr Pk.e. emmin fmOnpA r.OA end Pa.Nenb. N kml ane mneetlkn Ia-1 a I-.uir d •wry Im IM r rrm a wnkr In1-wm .a ®.mq tr fmL e. TT-Wr m. [pI-e r � q«rwelr. 7. RC 0-Mo rarew rwly cwe. S 1 0 0 v SEVER N 0 1 ES: I- UNr- arn+r Irr01f.I•A .-- • rl .lPr-ty (u.) a--ma rehd al cv.vr. tlrvebrc• .n r rOrin .w•r eatelWmr.a ]. U.• c x..nm R -1733 Nan .Im fry. 'I.' realtl prey Oea.r. eeltl, m m are& W.;Is Ur .l--I -n R- 5067 -DVM -.Wq .P•.w4 -.Ild, m r mta eery a aIe I«pl'er. 1 h IM ma tnn. Trine a .0 d.14r•. RCP &n . mwarun a Ye t.r-W V ..N Ie.Yrn mr junL MNk ra. r -II ..%. b Mn .. Y-an - .om t- P;P- W.I. Ara . r.w trnn w.a m e.roe era rrkr > .a.r Ia r - wrw IT- 1r m .;em-ta. .. Rei -an. cvrmb pe ap ryl'rga PIIr mnlsrw b w r..uimr.- r tM SA5- c S".W. c Cmrnl• swr Rr. em cm" .W. PL cry O-rpn a rin Nader w'ndordwp la be mw a ar reed:&.. Ure-. .uNwke -.ed0ed. rrremed mIrc-Ie rwr Pw an..nd -.c11elr .nr Iw a trn A-4 mrere nde« b'-Hnp gwe•t p:rl mrlrlNt•. n ASW C351 -65T, .dry 6mru.m e.a.smneM1 r reel a YNOOT Staer. Plem r. 3004. 1M pa4r aad m o=Pda b rP. b r t«N.a rNd w a.n s inn Wan j«•:p Pr. E R O S 1 0 N C 0 N 1 R O L N 0 T E S: 1. b d.0 •R Iro_r_w R maw, w w PI - Pd« b T Imr W! /•r Mp PPOdIp prpa4 A«na Na Y$ le�ea lebI' m . T- Ta k.a IT man ma N. a iewr r «) .up N IM Ierr- Tee a w ewmn «a. Ln w I.W. r w Uma IN<uN mM mmmel I..M erw rlke- r w To a . Tae Prl N rc.e, rate w 1.mk a t•rt a ird_.. fold 4 aw, OM -r.-v Irlar 4 le try• fmn Pe•t. SN I- Par. Par. -red >Fm •..-•- m krya .r... -.. aa1.a. I- U -- Ww tier "I T- U -rrrn arl P.r- -rra .rya mt - 1- 1.0 m W u'-a fmL P-a, -I INw . r.Mr•--n krrpm a 30 Ina... P. eafr m.Y. G•Ianb Ie«b -Ndl mnt m. rr.xalrN- a NNOOT Ston4.r. SP-tlbtlbn 3733 Taw 1 Irurll.lr -d m . asrliluar r.6 H -ra Y mad -Pk III/�/� Itl`V TOP 851.4 ELO 7I� IW. 1347.05 ® ++ �- SCALE IN FEET -e - - - - - --I 2. nmrw M Yme.r.ry •wwtk, arvcex.L w. mmlaa.4re.aer •turn mN emirrd eenvr m-kr rla 1 Bron 0�pwr�ny rNClnl. +ctrl R1PoIWfY R001 C016fRUCfON UIIRYfCC r cvcn Pb oil w &met -`IV - w. U. 1 Y 2 dm -n •Ia+r m WOOF G -1 a YNmT G -2 c..rw oggmMe. Raw IM . -TIM. M . ara� a rva 6 exM YkY ov.r In• .nr a !0 0 1n 111 u. [dena w r.e .eN. m Tor Irl Yd. w e- n-IrllalN tort. Uw . rar0r Imr;. areal w opp..p -I. i. a.a b a•..v - �f•a;an a -e] :It- w ..a Irerrt Prw. .. In-1 a $LOCK e-u ROCK smwmT nLtER m .1 mlPro.:n :nNY .la r«rr. r1.e11 fran ONlur.rtl Yn am. gb[e m. RePA e4c1 wkn .Dula a epsrr -mre rv�v.Y rMrrwl. .qP«•1� -mM. Levvn.(oS' PPen^pf)...s .mrNa ns Ran mmaa7 r«r pllwk• On wk •1..- ...-tl w adlea.ir Ira. R «. P.- inr.ly b tM I.o a w Y«e m-riv Mm w ..cx i- gOCr. IM -n-m aN l0 aewnl q- r.0r from nip rmm tm.wn tM I. .. R«. r.a opaxM tM aw nnM b w tm a tM U. t to ] relr Sanaa r..l ra .. Yxml G -1, I. CA G -], r u -] rm.. epp.epw. Ya.e tr .ww. a e• eka- b a.da b lean . m.Ha Ir6pN of fe'. s. R.m.w a w2• m. e•rmwe vwm - rnN.:. meerir m.pewMa •rm Rmla..l rw r m a m;M m.- .. a b- er.ttm a tM eerw rNn, amn mwa •maw . gewNp w r- 4. gp. SYaal rrVrp r rr.r .H7 reef f-mne4 nn A eMrrlp r •.wPirq. PI.n . 15' thilb W- r YR ' Sl.m -. 5•r$I4Nm 3601.7A Ckr ■ r enl.. 73' mkE 107fIn a YrO01 Sbmem SNC01mU -1 Se0129 pronlmr fryer PINT 1 1..811-- rrcatm N b. PI.n r .c4.rmnc- Ton Yx00T SbMeN SP «U;nLm 7511. 0--twti rd- aNr moP a w W a WOO? rSi P a W. hrtl eetl e I Ncw M1 e Y da E. gm Ra t. n 7m Ir w w, r 0.-. rw .1 n k.. gM r 'c . {ed. 11' c II.Ia, w Irnllrarm OWIrb/ a dpreP ar Imr etma -1 mrl M n0 IA wry Y.1 neulrr let 12' .Nmaa qp4: 7. P•rlerm a .Tor -n eaarr aiYlm b e®.ew .an q. - .Ilra. nta.d N to swt ma.p.na. Pmcllcw +armmr: 7roYCOp raa m-Plr . u.r4 A...ti• w.f.Me q IM Irnlnrb Pmnkn Cmxr Aem r. Ym"To mrm9- .timer h Ma .INf./ mwp•InW tern alter IM more ao}cl Pm InOepvN 111- amNrlloti f. caetrw a raP..r .'weer an finer -r rm.ip 3:1 (3 no✓ . b 1 VenieO. STONWATER 1W0ME2ET AREA Teal TYLa-7 0r-N". br . 7.01 «rr - O.Otla Ins oeli" SI.Im - 4$ 24r-, IPm W. 20 -w X ent 1pn ft t . &1114 m -m Ua sw- vavme Yan.. 0.'37 .... -n. 100 -YR Pm -o . Okm.fp• Iran P"' - 33.40 d• 100 -TIM Pry- O- roml•r a•mar - N.q1 d. N o $�LE loo' x Tar 1 �er-rr .f 1y OFF SITE PONDING DETAIL ATE REVISION CHRIST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH 0/117 ORIPNN PiAH MR V'8/97 else.. Pmo fEMS EDINA, MINNESOTA I/1f 07 QN16. POxO /4 /pe Si0PY1W1[A Ya-r SITE .IeY s /ve NLW sITE PLAN I Sand4e EngBne�r9ng� Inc. ./2 /fe w PACfux 4200 OM aN 5M-mr for. sun• 230 bmlr -pI 16.Ie-eb 3l4J7 Ie12� eel -]]u GRADING AND C1 UTILITY PLAN 1 of �T - 1175\ e.en en.7 TOP . 861.1 TRY, v 854.81 nr ,4 $7. � GB TOP - 658.7 INV. 850.66 1.1167 3 . ee4.0 T -1167 e - auS Fn &n.7 ,(1 884 \ 6 -aeo.5 ■9- a2 :o.7.111LEf� I ��t ®� ► L�, 7i, #Itj/ C EN E Ref N01 ES: 1. Eira4 Irorrnem7. leer:m, rrp -Pxk. sN tlaM1 Ir.rmaNn a=r r Uk Plm r Iran s a.4•I h Nvnwr flrsrp P7" 0-- m1m ) /S /9T. 2. I1- r.tlkr a annln re-- sn amroa -w .nf, ana .LSCr m eea C 1-800M WATT Z 1 ONE CALL tl 4!4-011111 in m- maro e. _kIl d" -11N mR Iti I.r •rtl rPrkM tl r.a :e -o•Yne 11.7 rya.- Man - -dnnip -rI nwdrYClYn. 1 M Pr.P.m. •..t rwaar Trot an 1- e.tmin r cure .nta aMrau IIr.IC.tM 4. Iwlrm w tsM1 ...>. .«•rmm- .mr Y• co .r Ea 1 C.-` e.nflI m M ail? NrlPle- Y 95% S- Pr«ta rTmimvm a7 ..I-q (ASTU o69e -711 .r AASNIo T -w) Iron w ar -.n m Allan 3 IM r w proms •urloo and 100% St.nmro Pr «Ir mmimulll 4ry .-Mi7 m Ir. nrr 3 1mt. 1r..+.... -6t7 1-a. k -Wk .rr mr Pk.e. emmin fmOnpA r.OA end Pa.Nenb. N kml ane mneetlkn Ia-1 a I-.uir d •wry Im IM r rrm a wnkr In1-wm .a ®.mq tr fmL e. TT-Wr m. [pI-e r � q«rwelr. 7. RC 0-Mo rarew rwly cwe. S 1 0 0 v SEVER N 0 1 ES: I- UNr- arn+r Irr01f.I•A .-- • rl .lPr-ty (u.) a--ma rehd al cv.vr. tlrvebrc• .n r rOrin .w•r eatelWmr.a ]. U.• c x..nm R -1733 Nan .Im fry. 'I.' realtl prey Oea.r. eeltl, m m are& W.;Is Ur .l--I -n R- 5067 -DVM -.Wq .P•.w4 -.Ild, m r mta eery a aIe I«pl'er. 1 h IM ma tnn. Trine a .0 d.14r•. RCP &n . mwarun a Ye t.r-W V ..N Ie.Yrn mr junL MNk ra. r -II ..%. b Mn .. Y-an - .om t- P;P- W.I. Ara . r.w trnn w.a m e.roe era rrkr > .a.r Ia r - wrw IT- 1r m .;em-ta. .. Rei -an. cvrmb pe ap ryl'rga PIIr mnlsrw b w r..uimr.- r tM SA5- c S".W. c Cmrnl• swr Rr. em cm" .W. PL cry O-rpn a rin Nader w'ndordwp la be mw a ar reed:&.. Ure-. .uNwke -.ed0ed. rrremed mIrc-Ie rwr Pw an..nd -.c11elr .nr Iw a trn A-4 mrere nde« b'-Hnp gwe•t p:rl mrlrlNt•. n ASW C351 -65T, .dry 6mru.m e.a.smneM1 r reel a YNOOT Staer. Plem r. 3004. 1M pa4r aad m o=Pda b rP. b r t«N.a rNd w a.n s inn Wan j«•:p Pr. E R O S 1 0 N C 0 N 1 R O L N 0 T E S: 1. b d.0 •R Iro_r_w R maw, w w PI - Pd« b T Imr W! /•r Mp PPOdIp prpa4 A«na Na Y$ le�ea lebI' m . T- Ta k.a IT man ma N. a iewr r «) .up N IM Ierr- Tee a w ewmn «a. Ln w I.W. r w Uma IN<uN mM mmmel I..M erw rlke- r w To a . Tae Prl N rc.e, rate w 1.mk a t•rt a ird_.. fold 4 aw, OM -r.-v Irlar 4 le try• fmn Pe•t. SN I- Par. Par. -red >Fm •..-•- m krya .r... -.. aa1.a. I- U -- Ww tier "I T- U -rrrn arl P.r- -rra .rya mt - 1- 1.0 m W u'-a fmL P-a, -I INw . r.Mr•--n krrpm a 30 Ina... P. eafr m.Y. G•Ianb Ie«b -Ndl mnt m. rr.xalrN- a NNOOT Ston4.r. SP-tlbtlbn 3733 Taw 1 Irurll.lr -d m . asrliluar r.6 H -ra Y mad -Pk III/�/� Itl`V TOP 851.4 ELO 7I� IW. 1347.05 ® ++ �- SCALE IN FEET -e - - - - - --I 2. nmrw M Yme.r.ry •wwtk, arvcex.L w. mmlaa.4re.aer •turn mN emirrd eenvr m-kr rla 1 Bron 0�pwr�ny rNClnl. +ctrl R1PoIWfY R001 C016fRUCfON UIIRYfCC r cvcn Pb oil w &met -`IV - w. U. 1 Y 2 dm -n •Ia+r m WOOF G -1 a YNmT G -2 c..rw oggmMe. Raw IM . -TIM. M . ara� a rva 6 exM YkY ov.r In• .nr a !0 0 1n 111 u. [dena w r.e .eN. m Tor Irl Yd. w e- n-IrllalN tort. Uw . rar0r Imr;. areal w opp..p -I. i. a.a b a•..v - �f•a;an a -e] :It- w ..a Irerrt Prw. .. In-1 a $LOCK e-u ROCK smwmT nLtER m .1 mlPro.:n :nNY .la r«rr. r1.e11 fran ONlur.rtl Yn am. gb[e m. RePA e4c1 wkn .Dula a epsrr -mre rv�v.Y rMrrwl. .qP«•1� -mM. Levvn.(oS' PPen^pf)...s .mrNa ns Ran mmaa7 r«r pllwk• On wk •1..- ...-tl w adlea.ir Ira. R «. P.- inr.ly b tM I.o a w Y«e m-riv Mm w ..cx i- gOCr. IM -n-m aN l0 aewnl q- r.0r from nip rmm tm.wn tM I. .. R«. r.a opaxM tM aw nnM b w tm a tM U. t to ] relr Sanaa r..l ra .. Yxml G -1, I. CA G -], r u -] rm.. epp.epw. Ya.e tr .ww. a e• eka- b a.da b lean . m.Ha Ir6pN of fe'. s. R.m.w a w2• m. e•rmwe vwm - rnN.:. meerir m.pewMa •rm Rmla..l rw r m a m;M m.- .. a b- er.ttm a tM eerw rNn, amn mwa •maw . gewNp w r- 4. gp. SYaal rrVrp r rr.r .H7 reef f-mne4 nn A eMrrlp r •.wPirq. PI.n . 15' thilb W- r YR ' Sl.m -. 5•r$I4Nm 3601.7A Ckr ■ r enl.. 73' mkE 107fIn a YrO01 Sbmem SNC01mU -1 Se0129 pronlmr fryer PINT 1 1..811-- rrcatm N b. PI.n r .c4.rmnc- Ton Yx00T SbMeN SP «U;nLm 7511. 0--twti rd- aNr moP a w W a WOO? rSi P a W. hrtl eetl e I Ncw M1 e Y da E. gm Ra t. n 7m Ir w w, r 0.-. rw .1 n k.. gM r 'c . {ed. 11' c II.Ia, w Irnllrarm OWIrb/ a dpreP ar Imr etma -1 mrl M n0 IA wry Y.1 neulrr let 12' .Nmaa qp4: 7. P•rlerm a .Tor -n eaarr aiYlm b e®.ew .an q. - .Ilra. nta.d N to swt ma.p.na. Pmcllcw +armmr: 7roYCOp raa m-Plr . u.r4 A...ti• w.f.Me q IM Irnlnrb Pmnkn Cmxr Aem r. Ym"To mrm9- .timer h Ma .INf./ mwp•InW tern alter IM more ao}cl Pm InOepvN 111- amNrlloti f. caetrw a raP..r .'weer an finer -r rm.ip 3:1 (3 no✓ . b 1 VenieO. STONWATER 1W0ME2ET AREA Teal TYLa-7 0r-N". br . 7.01 «rr - O.Otla Ins oeli" SI.Im - 4$ 24r-, IPm W. 20 -w X ent 1pn ft t . &1114 m -m Ua sw- vavme Yan.. 0.'37 .... -n. 100 -YR Pm -o . Okm.fp• Iran P"' - 33.40 d• 100 -TIM Pry- O- roml•r a•mar - N.q1 d. N o $�LE loo' x Tar 1 �er-rr .f 1y OFF SITE PONDING DETAIL ATE REVISION CHRIST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH 0/117 ORIPNN PiAH MR V'8/97 else.. Pmo fEMS EDINA, MINNESOTA I/1f 07 QN16. POxO /4 /pe Si0PY1W1[A Ya-r SITE .IeY s /ve NLW sITE PLAN I Sand4e EngBne�r9ng� Inc. ./2 /fe w PACfux 4200 OM aN 5M-mr for. sun• 230 bmlr -pI 16.Ie-eb 3l4J7 Ie12� eel -]]u GRADING AND C1 UTILITY PLAN 1 of 1.1167 3 . ee4.0 T -1167 e - auS Fn &n.7 ,(1 884 \ 6 -aeo.5 ■9- a2 :o.7.111LEf� I ��t ®� ► L�, 7i, #Itj/ C EN E Ref N01 ES: 1. Eira4 Irorrnem7. leer:m, rrp -Pxk. sN tlaM1 Ir.rmaNn a=r r Uk Plm r Iran s a.4•I h Nvnwr flrsrp P7" 0-- m1m ) /S /9T. 2. I1- r.tlkr a annln re-- sn amroa -w .nf, ana .LSCr m eea C 1-800M WATT Z 1 ONE CALL tl 4!4-011111 in m- maro e. _kIl d" -11N mR Iti I.r •rtl rPrkM tl r.a :e -o•Yne 11.7 rya.- Man - -dnnip -rI nwdrYClYn. 1 M Pr.P.m. •..t rwaar Trot an 1- e.tmin r cure .nta aMrau IIr.IC.tM 4. Iwlrm w tsM1 ...>. .«•rmm- .mr Y• co .r Ea 1 C.-` e.nflI m M ail? NrlPle- Y 95% S- Pr«ta rTmimvm a7 ..I-q (ASTU o69e -711 .r AASNIo T -w) Iron w ar -.n m Allan 3 IM r w proms •urloo and 100% St.nmro Pr «Ir mmimulll 4ry .-Mi7 m Ir. nrr 3 1mt. 1r..+.... -6t7 1-a. k -Wk .rr mr Pk.e. emmin fmOnpA r.OA end Pa.Nenb. N kml ane mneetlkn Ia-1 a I-.uir d •wry Im IM r rrm a wnkr In1-wm .a ®.mq tr fmL e. TT-Wr m. [pI-e r � q«rwelr. 7. RC 0-Mo rarew rwly cwe. S 1 0 0 v SEVER N 0 1 ES: I- UNr- arn+r Irr01f.I•A .-- • rl .lPr-ty (u.) a--ma rehd al cv.vr. tlrvebrc• .n r rOrin .w•r eatelWmr.a ]. U.• c x..nm R -1733 Nan .Im fry. 'I.' realtl prey Oea.r. eeltl, m m are& W.;Is Ur .l--I -n R- 5067 -DVM -.Wq .P•.w4 -.Ild, m r mta eery a aIe I«pl'er. 1 h IM ma tnn. Trine a .0 d.14r•. RCP &n . mwarun a Ye t.r-W V ..N Ie.Yrn mr junL MNk ra. r -II ..%. b Mn .. Y-an - .om t- P;P- W.I. Ara . r.w trnn w.a m e.roe era rrkr > .a.r Ia r - wrw IT- 1r m .;em-ta. .. Rei -an. cvrmb pe ap ryl'rga PIIr mnlsrw b w r..uimr.- r tM SA5- c S".W. c Cmrnl• swr Rr. em cm" .W. PL cry O-rpn a rin Nader w'ndordwp la be mw a ar reed:&.. Ure-. .uNwke -.ed0ed. rrremed mIrc-Ie rwr Pw an..nd -.c11elr .nr Iw a trn A-4 mrere nde« b'-Hnp gwe•t p:rl mrlrlNt•. n ASW C351 -65T, .dry 6mru.m e.a.smneM1 r reel a YNOOT Staer. Plem r. 3004. 1M pa4r aad m o=Pda b rP. b r t«N.a rNd w a.n s inn Wan j«•:p Pr. E R O S 1 0 N C 0 N 1 R O L N 0 T E S: 1. b d.0 •R Iro_r_w R maw, w w PI - Pd« b T Imr W! /•r Mp PPOdIp prpa4 A«na Na Y$ le�ea lebI' m . T- Ta k.a IT man ma N. a iewr r «) .up N IM Ierr- Tee a w ewmn «a. Ln w I.W. r w Uma IN<uN mM mmmel I..M erw rlke- r w To a . Tae Prl N rc.e, rate w 1.mk a t•rt a ird_.. fold 4 aw, OM -r.-v Irlar 4 le try• fmn Pe•t. SN I- Par. Par. -red >Fm •..-•- m krya .r... -.. aa1.a. I- U -- Ww tier "I T- U -rrrn arl P.r- -rra .rya mt - 1- 1.0 m W u'-a fmL P-a, -I INw . r.Mr•--n krrpm a 30 Ina... P. eafr m.Y. G•Ianb Ie«b -Ndl mnt m. rr.xalrN- a NNOOT Ston4.r. SP-tlbtlbn 3733 Taw 1 Irurll.lr -d m . asrliluar r.6 H -ra Y mad -Pk III/�/� Itl`V TOP 851.4 ELO 7I� IW. 1347.05 ® ++ �- SCALE IN FEET -e - - - - - --I 2. nmrw M Yme.r.ry •wwtk, arvcex.L w. mmlaa.4re.aer •turn mN emirrd eenvr m-kr rla 1 Bron 0�pwr�ny rNClnl. +ctrl R1PoIWfY R001 C016fRUCfON UIIRYfCC r cvcn Pb oil w &met -`IV - w. U. 1 Y 2 dm -n •Ia+r m WOOF G -1 a YNmT G -2 c..rw oggmMe. Raw IM . -TIM. M . ara� a rva 6 exM YkY ov.r In• .nr a !0 0 1n 111 u. [dena w r.e .eN. m Tor Irl Yd. w e- n-IrllalN tort. Uw . rar0r Imr;. areal w opp..p -I. i. a.a b a•..v - �f•a;an a -e] :It- w ..a Irerrt Prw. .. In-1 a $LOCK e-u ROCK smwmT nLtER m .1 mlPro.:n :nNY .la r«rr. r1.e11 fran ONlur.rtl Yn am. gb[e m. RePA e4c1 wkn .Dula a epsrr -mre rv�v.Y rMrrwl. .qP«•1� -mM. Levvn.(oS' PPen^pf)...s .mrNa ns Ran mmaa7 r«r pllwk• On wk •1..- ...-tl w adlea.ir Ira. R «. P.- inr.ly b tM I.o a w Y«e m-riv Mm w ..cx i- gOCr. IM -n-m aN l0 aewnl q- r.0r from nip rmm tm.wn tM I. .. R«. r.a opaxM tM aw nnM b w tm a tM U. t to ] relr Sanaa r..l ra .. Yxml G -1, I. CA G -], r u -] rm.. epp.epw. Ya.e tr .ww. a e• eka- b a.da b lean . m.Ha Ir6pN of fe'. s. R.m.w a w2• m. e•rmwe vwm - rnN.:. meerir m.pewMa •rm Rmla..l rw r m a m;M m.- .. a b- er.ttm a tM eerw rNn, amn mwa •maw . gewNp w r- 4. gp. SYaal rrVrp r rr.r .H7 reef f-mne4 nn A eMrrlp r •.wPirq. PI.n . 15' thilb W- r YR ' Sl.m -. 5•r$I4Nm 3601.7A Ckr ■ r enl.. 73' mkE 107fIn a YrO01 Sbmem SNC01mU -1 Se0129 pronlmr fryer PINT 1 1..811-- rrcatm N b. PI.n r .c4.rmnc- Ton Yx00T SbMeN SP «U;nLm 7511. 0--twti rd- aNr moP a w W a WOO? rSi P a W. hrtl eetl e I Ncw M1 e Y da E. gm Ra t. n 7m Ir w w, r 0.-. rw .1 n k.. gM r 'c . {ed. 11' c II.Ia, w Irnllrarm OWIrb/ a dpreP ar Imr etma -1 mrl M n0 IA wry Y.1 neulrr let 12' .Nmaa qp4: 7. P•rlerm a .Tor -n eaarr aiYlm b e®.ew .an q. - .Ilra. nta.d N to swt ma.p.na. Pmcllcw +armmr: 7roYCOp raa m-Plr . u.r4 A...ti• w.f.Me q IM Irnlnrb Pmnkn Cmxr Aem r. Ym"To mrm9- .timer h Ma .INf./ mwp•InW tern alter IM more ao}cl Pm InOepvN 111- amNrlloti f. caetrw a raP..r .'weer an finer -r rm.ip 3:1 (3 no✓ . b 1 VenieO. STONWATER 1W0ME2ET AREA Teal TYLa-7 0r-N". br . 7.01 «rr - O.Otla Ins oeli" SI.Im - 4$ 24r-, IPm W. 20 -w X ent 1pn ft t . &1114 m -m Ua sw- vavme Yan.. 0.'37 .... -n. 100 -YR Pm -o . Okm.fp• Iran P"' - 33.40 d• 100 -TIM Pry- O- roml•r a•mar - N.q1 d. N o $�LE loo' x Tar 1 �er-rr .f 1y OFF SITE PONDING DETAIL ATE REVISION CHRIST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH 0/117 ORIPNN PiAH MR V'8/97 else.. Pmo fEMS EDINA, MINNESOTA I/1f 07 QN16. POxO /4 /pe Si0PY1W1[A Ya-r SITE .IeY s /ve NLW sITE PLAN I Sand4e EngBne�r9ng� Inc. ./2 /fe w PACfux 4200 OM aN 5M-mr for. sun• 230 bmlr -pI 16.Ie-eb 3l4J7 Ie12� eel -]]u GRADING AND C1 UTILITY PLAN 1 of ............................ ....... ........................ ............................................................... .......................... .. ........................................................................ ........ ............... .. ............. GENERAL NOTES LIST OF SHEETS ALL NECESSARY AND /OR REQUIRED TESTS. NSPECigNS SHOP ORAWNG REVIEWS AND CS COVER SHEET DRAWING NTERPRETATIONS. REQUIRED BY THE GENERAL CONDITIONS. SHALL SE EXE- CIVIL CUTED BY A REGISTERED ARCHITECT AND/ OR BY A REGISTERED ENGINEER: IF NOT. THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD MID/ OR THE EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY ENGINEER OF RECORD SHALL BE HELD Cl GRADING M UTILITY PLAN - OPTION ONE HARMLESS FOR THAT PORTION OF THE WORK C2 GRADING L UTILITY PLAN - OPTION TWO IMPROPERLY EXECUTED. THE INSPECTION C3 GRADING 6 UTILITY PLAN - OPTION THREE ARCHITECT AND /OR ENGINEER SHALL BECOME CA GRADING 6 UTILITY PLAN - OPTION FOUR RESPONSIBLE FOR THOSE NSPECTIONS.OECI- SIONS AND /OR DOCUMENT INTERPRETATIONS MADE AS THEY RELATE TO THE CONTRACT SITE WORK DOCUMENTS AND THEIR INTENT. L1.1 SITE PLAN - OPTION ONE ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL MEET ALL L1.Z SITE PLAN - OPTION TWO APPLICABLE CODES AND MOST STRINGENT L1.3 SITE PLAN - OPTION THREE SHALL APPLY. L1.4 SITE PLAN - OPTION FOUR L2.1 LANDSCAPE PLAN - OPTION ONE SCALED MEASUREMENTS OF DRAWINGS 12.2 LANDSCAPE PLAT - OPTION TWO SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED. L2.3 LANDSCAPE PLAN - OPTION THREE 1.2.4 LANDSCAPE PLAN - OPTION FOUR OIMENSIONS GIVEN FOR MASONRY ON L3.0 ENLARGED LANDSCAPE PLAN ALONG EAST PROPERTY LINE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. ARE NOMINAL L3.1 ENLARGED LANDSCAPE PLAN ALONG NORTH PROPERTY LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. L3.2 SITE SECTIONS AT PROPERTY LINE OIYENSION FOR STUD WALLS ARE TO CENTER L4.1 E0.0 PHASE ONE SITE PLAN SITE LIGHTING PLAN LINE OF STUD AND DIMENSIONS FOR MASONRY WALLS ARE TO FACE OF BLOCK UNLESS ARCHITECTURAL STATED OTHERWISE. AM AM Aft A1.0 LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN 41.1 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN At.2 SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - A THIRD LEVEL FLOOR PLAN ® ® Al .0 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A2.1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Christ Presbyterian Church Addition and Remodeling Edina, Minnesota C I T Y S U B M I T T A L P A C K A G E CONSULTANTS PREPARED FOR ARCHITECTS CHRIST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH TUSHIE -MONTGOMERY & ASSOCIATES. INC. 6901 NORMA UALE ROAD 3300 EDINBOROUCH WAY, SUITE 601 GARY TUSHE (6T2) 830-5208 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55.35 MINNEAPOLIS. MINNESOTA 55.35 TOY YGORSE FAX (612) 830-8215 SURVEYOR CIVIL ENGINEER HANSEN THORP PELLINEN OLSON, INC. SUNDE ENGINEERING, INC. 7565 OFFICE RIDGE CIRCLE PAUL THORP 86121 529-0700 .200 WEST OLD SHAKOPEE ROAD. SUITE 230 RICK SCHULLER 1612) 681 -3344 EDEN PRATE. MINNESOTA 553.4 FAX (612) 829.7806 BLOOMINCTON. MINNESOTA 55437 -2967 FAX 1612) 881 -1913 ABBREVIATIONS SYMBOLS MATERIALS SITE LOCATION ABV -ABOVE ELECT - ELECTRIC (AL) INCL -INCLUDE (D.ING) PAR -PARALLEL S STL - STAINLESS STEEL AFF -ABOVE FINISHED EL 'ELE VATKN ID -INSIDE DIAMETER PART -PARTITION SD -STORM DRAIN ELEVATKN SYMBOL EARTH FLOOR ED -EQUAL INSUL- INwLATION PVMT -PAVEMENT STRUCT-STRUCTURAL ARCH -ARCHITECT EXH -EXHAUST TNT -INTERIOR P LAM -PLASTIC LAMINATE $YIN -SYNYETRY (ICALI O WINDOW SYMBOL STONE FILL CROSSTOWN - NWY 62 ALUM - ALUMNUM EXIST -EXISTING INV -INVERT PL -PLATE THK -THICK (NESS) OX. APPROXIMATE EJ - EXPANSION JOINT PT -POINT TOC -TOP OF CONRETE 15 DOOR SYMBOL FT—T. CONCRETE IREWFORCNG) EXP -EXPANSION PRESSURE TREATED CURB) BPL -BEARING PLATE EF EXHAUST FAN JST 'JOIST PVC POLYVINYL TOS -TOP OF SLAB A6 OETAI SYMBOL LIGHT WEIGHT CONCRETE BM 'BENCH MARX ELEC PNL-ELECTWCAL CHLOMDE TOW -TOP Of WALL BLKG -BLOCKING PANEL LAM -LAMINATE (D) PSF -POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT T 'TREAD � CONCRETE BLOCK (LARGE SCALE) BOT -BOTTOM EWC - ELECTRIC WATER LAV -LAVATORY TYP - TYPICAL /////2 SECTION SYMBOL BOW -BOTTOM OF WALL COOLER LH -LEFT HAND EXTERIOR PSI -Pp(Mp5 PER TOF -TOP OF FOOTING SQUARE INCH CONCRETE BLOCK [SMALL SCALEI EXT FFE LT -LIGHT - FINISHED FLOOR PC PRECAST POINT CURVE UNF FINISHED • AB ELEVATION SYMBOL ® STEEL (LARGE SCALEI SITE CIP -CAST -IN-PLACE ELEVATION MAT - MATERIAL PL -URINAL - PROPERTY LINE UR -URINAL T CB CATCH BASIN FPL FD FIREPLACE MH - MANHOLE Pp -POWER POLE LINO -UNLESS NOTED FINISH WOOD WEST 70TH STREET CLG - CEILING -FLOOR DRAIN MFR - MANUFACTURE(R) OTHERWISE `'J CT CLR -CERAMIC TILE -CLEAR (ANCEI FTC FND -FOOTING FOUNDATION ALAS - MASONRY MO - MASONRY OPENING OT R -QUARRY TILE -RADIUS VERT -VER71CAL T Aa— • — GRID SYMBOL ® ROUGH OR OIMENSDNEO WOOD Of CONIC -CONCRETE FH -FIRE HYDRANT MTL -METAL RA -RETURN NR VTR -VENT THRU ROOF CMU CONCRETE MA- MISC -MISCELLANEOUS RD ROOF DRAIN PLYWDOO SONRY UHT GA -GAGE. GAUGE REF -REFERENCE WD -WOOD CONST -CONSTRUCTION GALV - CALVAWZEO RF 'ROCK FACE WC .WATER CLOSET NT 57011E CONT -CONTINUE (OUS) GC - GENERAL NIC -NOT IN CONTRACT RH 1 - RIG. IT KIND p R CRS -COURSE CONTRACT COR) NI TS -NOT TO SCALE ROW WH -WATER HEATER -RIGHT OF WAY WP ROOM SYMBOL FACE CJ CONTROL JOINT GB .GRAB BAR NO -NUMBER RM -ROOM HDW -HARDWARE RD -WATERPROOFING WR -WATER RESISTANT -ROUGH OPENING WWF - WELDED WIRE ® LOOSE BATT INSULATION DTL -DETAIL R F S ROD AND SHELF FABRIC LOCATION TARGET DA -DIAMETER HVAC -HEATING/ VENT./ OC -ON CENTER WIDE DIM -DIMENSION AIR CONDITIONING OPNG - OPENING SHTG -SHEATHING W -WIDTH, - - PROPERTY LINES RICO WSILATDN INTERSTATE HWY, 494 DR -DOOR HT -HEIGHT OPP - OPPOSTE SHR SHOWER - DS -DOWNSPOUT HC -HANDICAP OPH - OPPOSTE HAND SIM -SW4AR — CENTER LINE ® WOOD STUD (LARGE SCALFI DWG - DRAWING HM HOLLOW METAL OD - OUTSIDE DIAMETER SC -SOLD CORE YH -YARD HYDRANT DF -DRINKING HOR -HORIZONTAL OH - OVERHEAD SPEC -SPECIFICATION(S) YD -YARD DRAIN EXLST.i HIDDEN LINES STUD MALL (SMALL SCALEI FOUNTAIN -HOSE BIBB OHD -OVERHEAD DOOR SO -SQUARE YI -YARD INLET ��y EXPANSION JOINT ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ............................... .................. .......... .. .. .. ... s U L s V a C O •� V C VI C 1.L W ,1^ VI L s U Tushia Montgomery ASSOCiOtaB Inc. A.R�....�.A��1. 6-Pex... 3300 Eewibo P gh Way, •601 Mirm400d)a, mil t. 55.35 612 - 830-8208 FM: 530-8215 diWlart[CIMMA Ar. [aPK[ar4: s[cW Nx x aaraa +o Plssr.ro[ W annul ..Kn xellw mreA� IK MP[iECI. cL caw awl: aF ll.rowr Na a.B. WK I(IK.r MSQCA� K.>a1r[0. caa 91=1 Dram BT TIM Mcltil.cl TM ch.[.ea c, TL. GT DPI. 2-9.96 Rarid.lu • Sga1 G1111OiKl9 O show -a q 9w (1411 P,,',,t NP. /'�c 96=11111, /1 C W EXISTING CONDI - IONS LEGEND O IRON MONUMENT .2y$m $'yyyG <I� lei O MANHOLE 4 <B� - °$. newr.6 $,6 °°g, °° `p CATCH BASIN <$° - A. W dD9 •! M HYpRART Dd WATER VALVE LIGHT POLE - ff a S J t•.• n s Ma.wy yTo� �V G• ° C. POWER POLE sp ° ( S • y L (WA ° C ° Q3,26„M WATERYAW \ P Pa y • n■ 88 - V �' . AT .4 f I < SANITARY SEWER • 15 p STORY SEWER _ �° x n x x _ 69 � - Y E— UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC i! No _ 0� I y I. o^ T FENCE UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE ^ + - u e > ^ t��• Y ..E7xit As s •,x 0 4.n F 1 G CAS —0E-OVERHEAD ° Tw7FT y 7s�� p x -x Y •� A V Z I 1 I ELECTRIC — - - EASEMENT LINE }Z; H; x = ye N �t��•') :� ■ 7 Ia I I A .r4m N . �` �I x I A CONTROL ACCESS x °� �• I ixF W .. \ L UT 113'1 _ X 36.9 SPOT ELEVATION rN 8 d e V � •9r • 4 310 0 2 .4.3< V w <S.33; o © x t" f2 _I w s f �900_ EXISTING CONTOURS . ° .e ° + lP fJt jI X n S n n ° a rO t^ to a - s C Q DECIDUOUS TREE t0 C a r y I 1t�% 1 g r �` A t ^i • a e 3 Of Si e.�B I w 1 d c O ` i CONIFEROUS TREE ev e W C ° x I x .��.. n f WOI pt -• 4 A a r_ —� r— il+Is I ml ORTH o °H 6A no ° •t a Ha. b 4 w •t . : . .a O V - thereby Certify that this survey 2. I was prepared by me or under my • .• -+ ° rr < &t tr _ 1.OT g� O DE < OUTH d „ — — — — supervision and that tom duly egis ad Iona surveyor under Minnaedta Statutes Section 326.02 to 326.16 -� r+ %K % gg i (tip � rY a i' y> +.N ! z �• 170.99 E L � y � k � Reg. NO. Date, p r n . F¢ i ip m ^ -•S x y s �I V x� u WA I 4 � R iA ° G Q• c o � g x aid! iy � 1 � •. m x g Is III I x & i ss7.4 � O 4:f _ M ' 15 SOUTH U tD m u NOTE: This survey Was prepared using a Compilation of collected field data and data appearing an a survey prepared by Sunda Surveying dated JWy..O 1989. x V 85. 5 - a n G r o e -M ' I G �. N a O at " Is O1 x BBM V • _ D BENCHMARK: Top nut of Hydrant at the NE Corner of W. 69th St. and E. Frontage Rd. of NE Hey. 100 E1aIf. • 872.22 CONC. x x o I _ yI ty O m y n A` v _ OQ i 9. sV ..Pf • ° t OI"9 7C 6 Is e % % af6A 1 r V N r m 1�nI t7 aw l7 f,J t- x Arch 1 $ n' m z °o o v 9 cii Z 0 sgk +¢ a i x _ 0 0TH I 1.20 3 I I A 5 e a^ BRITT NY ROA f0 ■ TH 72.16 % a p ; e e 9 b� ° b Scale in feet z. Q ab to V 0 40 80 120 m TC848.1 6 'It 9 Hansen Thorp D t PT 0l Pellinen Olson Inc. AHb 11 Engineers - Surveyors, Landscape Architects 97.111 p` Date 7565 Office Ridge Circle 07.08-97 Cash Pr oiri.. MN 55344.3644 (612) 829 -0700 FAX (612) 829.7806 W ETOP 970.0 INV. 866.0 12" R.C.P. ST. S. O 1.007( TEMPORARY ROCK ENTRANCE CONNECT TO EXISTING ST. S. CATCH BASIN INV. = 865.00 ADJUST TOP OF EXIST. CB. NEW TOP - 970.8 ABANDON BY REMOVING EXIS 69TH STREET STORM SEWER. BULKHEAD MANHOLE. 2 ST. S. CS = TOP 869.5 INV. 865.96 ADJUST TOP OF EX. SAN. S. MH NEW TOP .869.6 3 ST. S. CS TOP - 869.25 INV. - 865.48 4 I ST. S. CB TOP - 869.25 1.. = 864.99 - v:SC _ 4 11 d � f TOP 07C.3 n INv, 861_ E INV. B6t 1 5 ') IYv. 6653 _c 5. I RELOCATE P.I.V.I .a 17 ST. S. CB T TC? Be' (T .652! \ 8 852.3 12" P.V.C. ST, S. N .1. 16 ST. S. CS TOP 845.5 INv. 842.32 ^I O 1.471( CONNECT TO EXISTIe $T. S. CATCH BASIN 1 INV, v 841.0 i I 40 C <C 60 SCA!_ \ I a '�-�:1�1c�ii� �� • ��II�:9= �dlii� `J /% �r�IS71JlFii% ©r *�� HIiI�► 1�BJ6►14t l:.T.r��r��l� _x $ SECOND OOR ELM. I . c - 73.69 )OSTI MATCH „I c 973.59 m .1,"E 073.691 136 V p ;A FPE 57170 Tcru4.2 If - 111 %9' - STORY EXISTING 12-RCP ~ E ll .x BUILDING -B6 i TC?E2.3 II'..jb- 'I.EC FFEI 5 2111 FFE 0871.69 '[956.1 hN N Nol Tcesxe _, 99 - OS< S_� 65G54EC :.'.WG TCBS2.9 TCB49 ] Ca 1� rc6.73 '• 7 _ Tcea6 c i _ea6c FFE 9112.63 662.7 FFE 262.7, 6 FFE 862.63 112.7 5.06 FFE B j nFPE BE4.46 1 ` FFE 562.630f 7.p0 FrE 857, OB __.. FFE 5551. '•►[:• ,`,�,ic �I�� :. •;acv= :.�!� ®._/ M I K,y._ s a�n r ce.a- -a G Ian I. a. 1 2}- OAa I E' A9f f_1 �� �L SPa , 1 T 085" i6 n B -SZ - •(fill- �y� p �B - 0852 '-'°i SILT FENCE 3 �) 7 T -679 8 -87" r - e7e \ B ST. S. CB 0874.5/ TOP = 863.55 INV. 858.52 2 S V E A4� • E F` z� 9e0i 0'2 T - 876\ 8 - 873/ °79.7 9 1 ST. S. Ce TOP = 860.19 INV. = 854.24 101 ST. S. CB TOP - 855.0 INV. - 850.05 T .0867 T 0867 a% i T - 0867 AI . ee.� GA 4. c _72.5 -:c en .7 IIN n5g.23 AREA OF TEMP. FLOOOINC 100 YR. PEAK ELEVATION HIGH WATER - 653.14 le 11 ST. S. CB TOP - 854.0 INV, a 849.75 P S. CB OP 854.0 V. - 850.0 C E N E A A l N 0 f E S: t. Eselig bamday, location. topopaprie. ona .toy iNa.aua, lien on Y abn b Iron a asset w Inch- I" P,IUar, Olsac, apes dew 7/6/97. 2. The bCpiah,s at ul'Ai1:e• ecn, an apaasirNl. ant,. DIN, 12ilia may .sip snich haw hart peen sh ton. Contact CORNER STATE ONE CALL at 454 -0002 in the moue aro., a 1 -600- 252-1165 10, Ira 1. .(tat adani.- so leap so •an+q pow hoard baforst begin" any con.brwtiac. 3. MI Is- opal pectic.. eNw- as b Ntlorn d aura .Nm . h,,W- indicated. I. PCdam W au6t7 R,k th atcordarea site IN Ely d Edins apeaRi {ions. S. Comsat tickm in all utxty Irerbns to 951E Staaard Precis malaham pry density (ASNI 06908 -78 w AASHTO 1-99) Iron IN as son. le within 3 fort .1 IN grasp arfea and 10016 Slandar0 Plata mairrbm pry pmaty in IN 1.- 3 1st. P,wis deNt, l.sto in W. and MI. aactl ashou" facungt -bat and oawhNnlL N best w cc,~;" last is reaobed la awry too fw of load, at w,tea adsrels not sCminq lA lest. 6. Nally LN Engims, o' any di capOnG6 S T O R Y 5 E W E R N O T E S 1. Untamed all -n.ia isoicso d. m 4 It. dump« (Lt) In -acso ,oidpatl a.n«ol, sb b hso ac as adorn doss, eatelmvalrt 2. Us a NaNh R -1733 frays with ys'C' radio p,adL. s .PPratl dud. an at, and, "N. Us KMMh R- 3067 -DR/01. aepbq with auto pet a app,awd dud, on all Catch Marto at NT I¢aua,L 3. Tip IN � .scups Of a. 11,rgNtl RCP stem owe, .,a a of two Carlow W pat fa.dsNn o« is - ThY ,slr+m,r«ll .apk. to oath uNtrtldr ape do had c- -soli and Ins"" hooded than pars an Ibis as IioO a aoarb fa ad pips bryo the 12" in damp «. 4. R -danced "Weds spa IN Nlilrp..IwW cant.- la IN C_uiNns ds of IN Statlad Spea+6cel'aM Ian ".1anord ,, Sewer Rpe. ASTM Oesigno6s C76 Daps C .its rcJe, rsinfant g Io IN aim of as .poc;Nd. Unlm eU«.Y. sosaYYd, /asoorood coaeds seep Ppe and sac sodas tau law a tm R-4 rs,Faad rubes b'-riq panel 7On1 cvetruettl In aaacroano .lu ASTY 0361 -65I. .inn dinandiob a000 insu" a .Mesh ac Y..=T Staa.ry Plots No. 3006F. fN paYSl -1 s ci c in am- .ealiac. ConarM os to de ja1W solos N Class 5 Tick Woo JocUng Pia• E R O S I O N C 0 N 7 R 0 L N O T E S 1. I,nd lilt tams at tl,. I.-tCa sown on IN Pc_ Clio to .pinarq eohno-ti... a.tp .21 fence .ids a past spacing W . Ill a Ira. Orlw pads d Yap 2 fat iMe IN 9roa,L Andy 1IW ad laws fade it a VWh (a bon 6 nwM dap and 6 Inch, wide) dug e, IN ,plop• sis of !N .appal pops. La he bpi. ih IN thew, and Iha, a.cw. and aorq.al. YeYS on, daunt W UY '.Mi. ot a Ienu pal Al Pip- wades IN fade p Yap 6 --- fob It Pia, so aav,elp'ata, d to the lea past. Sit sadin9 pogo sped N 2 inch soon or -W ha,dsoad. Pit. a pandas T- o U -spice psi pads. T- a U -stllen sdsN port. .N6 d.igd Nt Ira Ilan 1.0 lb a• lineal fact. Palo sots Ira, a minimum "th of 30 loch.i ow phis. depth. Gso N lope pall mat IN 13 ST. S. CB 1s ST. S. CB TOP - 851.4 TOP = 857.4 INV. 846.75 INV. = 846.65 - _,.�` -", _•.'ran` CONSTRUCT NEW ST. S. 15 ST. S. MH MH ON EXISTING 36" - STORM SEWER TOP - 848.6 840.84 2. Ro e OI tamp«arl, wpth fc. so-wak and ai.d.p-- .roses and s.bNnl cem,.1 d hi afw [N ads No ..."Its, find pea6saii., x TMOe spina Ia>wp"' �istao a TE PORAIM ROCK COISTRUCTION ENTRANCE t cn pant wlan wni:W sit Is acn.tnrcllon ail.. Ys 1 b 2 inch dbm.i« yak torn YNOOT G -1 o dNOOT CA-2 cows oppropde. Pbce as 1N Oppr.pata in a lay., at ball 6 inches lha perm tN anti..khh el IN antnrce. E.- IN roCY a Krone! dl lasso 50 lap into IN esuVlnelien Ana. uY gtlhn"No fabric T NNa me ogglegals in erdeh to a...ni mipral:pn of pal into Inc racy fern bob.. a, BLOCK ANO ROCK SEOIMENI FILTER so ea Na act,hn mild. .h;.h ,swiss n I Irani dild,,th I arse. Bfal, and Rock MM Fift- schist so open -..n conchal. meson, YL -�•ira scroon (0.5' .. 6 q ), aM awlba -1 PION «. npdany bfaclto I -wNsm, ac ~ .ids canal IN catchlr®n inlet. Pleasi airs pooch arauN p,. Pori od to the is Of IN bleak ba.ia before IN rack is oaC.d. IN a,s„ ads to Phnnod tN rock. Non barq .aantl tnrangh IN blocs.. Plan yak apa'nso tn..in m,sn to IN too of In. dxk.. Its 1 to 3 inct, dlemsta roc. torch as YNOOT CA-1. CA-2, R CA-3 CNrr A"noW . INIa tac eaane d 8' blab in one b Ism a barb, Mipnl I 16'. 5. Remaw dl oL eac ■aliment. ✓ IcFN a ollana depasdtl onto oaho,aht «.a. R.. -1 .N. de an a siy Nsio Ihro,,, -t IN .uMbn of IN caNplwllon. Cltln pawl raea.p,s w shaping a a. pi q. Sl,w waning b dbsd acy altar s. ;-.I N. bas, n,Ned by Norairq a - .aaairq. 5. PYws a 15' thick law of MAIDDY SIaNp7N Spaeilipd'nn 3601.2A Pas N rioap ands a 7A' thick WW of MNOW StaN«d Specification 3601.2.6 gas delta _t.,w d locsoiaa in icots an N. pan in aI-- with MNDOT Sl~d Soai1'cotbn 2511. Gcataso:b Iitg, nblcriel may ve used in f OI 9ranwlo, I ;- -law. Install riprop a sl,wr, a, MKDOT StasaN Pbte No. 31338 and Ply of Eason StaNa,d Plate Ka. 260 far 1N pis of pis Mated. Far Pipe sus pope« pan 12' a--. 1. -imam pac. 111 d Roast ape fill« chop slap N Ys flan mso hsh irtl I« 12' diOrNds, spas. 7. Part- s .ro.ipe .-I. prpclim in aaaeora .ill, the nabade _11INd in IN b.p manaparrnsol pales Nraboole 'Pretedinp wan:« Ow6y in undon A . Ntsteded by sob W.Notl. Pdlwien (antral Apanw. 8. Clean sl as lanparoy sedissoldo6o, bOsiN to de used a _. . spa 0udiy n-n"- basin sole IN sours ,"op. Ns ~9- final - a6souaL 9. fansbat 0. propped tia ftM sun groda NI goatling 3:1 (3 hoddonlal b 1 vsrliacl). STORMWATEA MANAGEMENT AREA Too T.D.1ay Drdnapa Also . 7.09 was - 0.01108 '2 Dpipn Stara - SCS. 24 -1. Typo I: 100 -YR Ni9l, snots, Llano - rB.u3.11 Ira -Wt the St", 1ra'wra Ulildtl - 0.2137 aas-fl. 100-18 Psi- O«alpn,art Od.Nrpa don Pars - 2.LQ ass 100 -TR pro- O..aoon ad Pahang, 24 24.05 alp �aad�aK+a ,wan J �I I u 4nocAtm ,arson SCALE ,secs -n ,• _ 100• Slow � 1 0 L it OFF -SITE PONDING DETAIL I a '�-�:1�1c�ii� �� • ��II�:9= �dlii� `J /% �r�IS71JlFii% ©r *�� HIiI�► 1�BJ6►14t l:.T.r��r��l� _x $ SECOND OOR ELM. I . c - 73.69 )OSTI MATCH „I c 973.59 m .1,"E 073.691 136 V p ;A FPE 57170 Tcru4.2 If - 111 %9' - STORY EXISTING 12-RCP ~ E ll .x BUILDING -B6 i TC?E2.3 II'..jb- 'I.EC FFEI 5 2111 FFE 0871.69 '[956.1 hN N Nol Tcesxe _, 99 - OS< S_� 65G54EC :.'.WG TCBS2.9 TCB49 ] Ca 1� rc6.73 '• 7 _ Tcea6 c i _ea6c FFE 9112.63 662.7 FFE 262.7, 6 FFE 862.63 112.7 5.06 FFE B j nFPE BE4.46 1 ` FFE 562.630f 7.p0 FrE 857, OB __.. FFE 5551. '•►[:• ,`,�,ic �I�� :. •;acv= :.�!� ®._/ M I K,y._ s a�n r ce.a- -a G Ian I. a. 1 2}- OAa I E' A9f f_1 �� �L SPa , 1 T 085" i6 n B -SZ - •(fill- �y� p �B - 0852 '-'°i SILT FENCE 3 �) 7 T -679 8 -87" r - e7e \ B ST. S. CB 0874.5/ TOP = 863.55 INV. 858.52 2 S V E A4� • E F` z� 9e0i 0'2 T - 876\ 8 - 873/ °79.7 9 1 ST. S. Ce TOP = 860.19 INV. = 854.24 101 ST. S. CB TOP - 855.0 INV. - 850.05 T .0867 T 0867 a% i T - 0867 AI . ee.� GA 4. c _72.5 -:c en .7 IIN n5g.23 AREA OF TEMP. FLOOOINC 100 YR. PEAK ELEVATION HIGH WATER - 653.14 le 11 ST. S. CB TOP - 854.0 INV, a 849.75 P S. CB OP 854.0 V. - 850.0 C E N E A A l N 0 f E S: t. Eselig bamday, location. topopaprie. ona .toy iNa.aua, lien on Y abn b Iron a asset w Inch- I" P,IUar, Olsac, apes dew 7/6/97. 2. The bCpiah,s at ul'Ai1:e• ecn, an apaasirNl. ant,. DIN, 12ilia may .sip snich haw hart peen sh ton. Contact CORNER STATE ONE CALL at 454 -0002 in the moue aro., a 1 -600- 252-1165 10, Ira 1. .(tat adani.- so leap so •an+q pow hoard baforst begin" any con.brwtiac. 3. MI Is- opal pectic.. eNw- as b Ntlorn d aura .Nm . h,,W- indicated. I. PCdam W au6t7 R,k th atcordarea site IN Ely d Edins apeaRi {ions. S. Comsat tickm in all utxty Irerbns to 951E Staaard Precis malaham pry density (ASNI 06908 -78 w AASHTO 1-99) Iron IN as son. le within 3 fort .1 IN grasp arfea and 10016 Slandar0 Plata mairrbm pry pmaty in IN 1.- 3 1st. P,wis deNt, l.sto in W. and MI. aactl ashou" facungt -bat and oawhNnlL N best w cc,~;" last is reaobed la awry too fw of load, at w,tea adsrels not sCminq lA lest. 6. Nally LN Engims, o' any di capOnG6 S T O R Y 5 E W E R N O T E S 1. Untamed all -n.ia isoicso d. m 4 It. dump« (Lt) In -acso ,oidpatl a.n«ol, sb b hso ac as adorn doss, eatelmvalrt 2. Us a NaNh R -1733 frays with ys'C' radio p,adL. s .PPratl dud. an at, and, "N. Us KMMh R- 3067 -DR/01. aepbq with auto pet a app,awd dud, on all Catch Marto at NT I¢aua,L 3. Tip IN � .scups Of a. 11,rgNtl RCP stem owe, .,a a of two Carlow W pat fa.dsNn o« is - ThY ,slr+m,r«ll .apk. to oath uNtrtldr ape do had c- -soli and Ins"" hooded than pars an Ibis as IioO a aoarb fa ad pips bryo the 12" in damp «. 4. R -danced "Weds spa IN Nlilrp..IwW cant.- la IN C_uiNns ds of IN Statlad Spea+6cel'aM Ian ".1anord ,, Sewer Rpe. ASTM Oesigno6s C76 Daps C .its rcJe, rsinfant g Io IN aim of as .poc;Nd. Unlm eU«.Y. sosaYYd, /asoorood coaeds seep Ppe and sac sodas tau law a tm R-4 rs,Faad rubes b'-riq panel 7On1 cvetruettl In aaacroano .lu ASTY 0361 -65I. .inn dinandiob a000 insu" a .Mesh ac Y..=T Staa.ry Plots No. 3006F. fN paYSl -1 s ci c in am- .ealiac. ConarM os to de ja1W solos N Class 5 Tick Woo JocUng Pia• E R O S I O N C 0 N 7 R 0 L N O T E S 1. I,nd lilt tams at tl,. I.-tCa sown on IN Pc_ Clio to .pinarq eohno-ti... a.tp .21 fence .ids a past spacing W . Ill a Ira. Orlw pads d Yap 2 fat iMe IN 9roa,L Andy 1IW ad laws fade it a VWh (a bon 6 nwM dap and 6 Inch, wide) dug e, IN ,plop• sis of !N .appal pops. La he bpi. ih IN thew, and Iha, a.cw. and aorq.al. YeYS on, daunt W UY '.Mi. ot a Ienu pal Al Pip- wades IN fade p Yap 6 --- fob It Pia, so aav,elp'ata, d to the lea past. Sit sadin9 pogo sped N 2 inch soon or -W ha,dsoad. Pit. a pandas T- o U -spice psi pads. T- a U -stllen sdsN port. .N6 d.igd Nt Ira Ilan 1.0 lb a• lineal fact. Palo sots Ira, a minimum "th of 30 loch.i ow phis. depth. Gso N lope pall mat IN 13 ST. S. CB 1s ST. S. CB TOP - 851.4 TOP = 857.4 INV. 846.75 INV. = 846.65 - _,.�` -", _•.'ran` CONSTRUCT NEW ST. S. 15 ST. S. MH MH ON EXISTING 36" - STORM SEWER TOP - 848.6 840.84 2. Ro e OI tamp«arl, wpth fc. so-wak and ai.d.p-- .roses and s.bNnl cem,.1 d hi afw [N ads No ..."Its, find pea6saii., x TMOe spina Ia>wp"' �istao a TE PORAIM ROCK COISTRUCTION ENTRANCE t cn pant wlan wni:W sit Is acn.tnrcllon ail.. Ys 1 b 2 inch dbm.i« yak torn YNOOT G -1 o dNOOT CA-2 cows oppropde. Pbce as 1N Oppr.pata in a lay., at ball 6 inches lha perm tN anti..khh el IN antnrce. E.- IN roCY a Krone! dl lasso 50 lap into IN esuVlnelien Ana. uY gtlhn"No fabric T NNa me ogglegals in erdeh to a...ni mipral:pn of pal into Inc racy fern bob.. a, BLOCK ANO ROCK SEOIMENI FILTER so ea Na act,hn mild. .h;.h ,swiss n I Irani dild,,th I arse. Bfal, and Rock MM Fift- schist so open -..n conchal. meson, YL -�•ira scroon (0.5' .. 6 q ), aM awlba -1 PION «. npdany bfaclto I -wNsm, ac ~ .ids canal IN catchlr®n inlet. Pleasi airs pooch arauN p,. Pori od to the is Of IN bleak ba.ia before IN rack is oaC.d. IN a,s„ ads to Phnnod tN rock. Non barq .aantl tnrangh IN blocs.. Plan yak apa'nso tn..in m,sn to IN too of In. dxk.. Its 1 to 3 inct, dlemsta roc. torch as YNOOT CA-1. CA-2, R CA-3 CNrr A"noW . INIa tac eaane d 8' blab in one b Ism a barb, Mipnl I 16'. 5. Remaw dl oL eac ■aliment. ✓ IcFN a ollana depasdtl onto oaho,aht «.a. R.. -1 .N. de an a siy Nsio Ihro,,, -t IN .uMbn of IN caNplwllon. Cltln pawl raea.p,s w shaping a a. pi q. Sl,w waning b dbsd acy altar s. ;-.I N. bas, n,Ned by Norairq a - .aaairq. 5. PYws a 15' thick law of MAIDDY SIaNp7N Spaeilipd'nn 3601.2A Pas N rioap ands a 7A' thick WW of MNOW StaN«d Specification 3601.2.6 gas delta _t.,w d locsoiaa in icots an N. pan in aI-- with MNDOT Sl~d Soai1'cotbn 2511. Gcataso:b Iitg, nblcriel may ve used in f OI 9ranwlo, I ;- -law. Install riprop a sl,wr, a, MKDOT StasaN Pbte No. 31338 and Ply of Eason StaNa,d Plate Ka. 260 far 1N pis of pis Mated. Far Pipe sus pope« pan 12' a--. 1. -imam pac. 111 d Roast ape fill« chop slap N Ys flan mso hsh irtl I« 12' diOrNds, spas. 7. Part- s .ro.ipe .-I. prpclim in aaaeora .ill, the nabade _11INd in IN b.p manaparrnsol pales Nraboole 'Pretedinp wan:« Ow6y in undon A . Ntsteded by sob W.Notl. Pdlwien (antral Apanw. 8. Clean sl as lanparoy sedissoldo6o, bOsiN to de used a _. . spa 0udiy n-n"- basin sole IN sours ,"op. Ns ~9- final - a6souaL 9. fansbat 0. propped tia ftM sun groda NI goatling 3:1 (3 hoddonlal b 1 vsrliacl). STORMWATEA MANAGEMENT AREA Too T.D.1ay Drdnapa Also . 7.09 was - 0.01108 '2 Dpipn Stara - SCS. 24 -1. Typo I: 100 -YR Ni9l, snots, Llano - rB.u3.11 Ira -Wt the St", 1ra'wra Ulildtl - 0.2137 aas-fl. 100-18 Psi- O«alpn,art Od.Nrpa don Pars - 2.LQ ass 100 -TR pro- O..aoon ad Pahang, 24 24.05 alp �aad�aK+a ,wan J �I I u 4nocAtm ,arson SCALE ,secs -n ,• _ 100• Slow � 1 0 L it OFF -SITE PONDING DETAIL '[956.1 hN N Nol Tcesxe _, 99 - OS< S_� 65G54EC :.'.WG TCBS2.9 TCB49 ] Ca 1� rc6.73 '• 7 _ Tcea6 c i _ea6c FFE 9112.63 662.7 FFE 262.7, 6 FFE 862.63 112.7 5.06 FFE B j nFPE BE4.46 1 ` FFE 562.630f 7.p0 FrE 857, OB __.. FFE 5551. '•►[:• ,`,�,ic �I�� :. •;acv= :.�!� ®._/ M I K,y._ s a�n r ce.a- -a G Ian I. a. 1 2}- OAa I E' A9f f_1 �� �L SPa , 1 T 085" i6 n B -SZ - •(fill- �y� p �B - 0852 '-'°i SILT FENCE 3 �) 7 T -679 8 -87" r - e7e \ B ST. S. CB 0874.5/ TOP = 863.55 INV. 858.52 2 S V E A4� • E F` z� 9e0i 0'2 T - 876\ 8 - 873/ °79.7 9 1 ST. S. Ce TOP = 860.19 INV. = 854.24 101 ST. S. CB TOP - 855.0 INV. - 850.05 T .0867 T 0867 a% i T - 0867 AI . ee.� GA 4. c _72.5 -:c en .7 IIN n5g.23 AREA OF TEMP. FLOOOINC 100 YR. PEAK ELEVATION HIGH WATER - 653.14 le 11 ST. S. CB TOP - 854.0 INV, a 849.75 P S. CB OP 854.0 V. - 850.0 C E N E A A l N 0 f E S: t. Eselig bamday, location. topopaprie. ona .toy iNa.aua, lien on Y abn b Iron a asset w Inch- I" P,IUar, Olsac, apes dew 7/6/97. 2. The bCpiah,s at ul'Ai1:e• ecn, an apaasirNl. ant,. DIN, 12ilia may .sip snich haw hart peen sh ton. Contact CORNER STATE ONE CALL at 454 -0002 in the moue aro., a 1 -600- 252-1165 10, Ira 1. .(tat adani.- so leap so •an+q pow hoard baforst begin" any con.brwtiac. 3. MI Is- opal pectic.. eNw- as b Ntlorn d aura .Nm . h,,W- indicated. I. PCdam W au6t7 R,k th atcordarea site IN Ely d Edins apeaRi {ions. S. Comsat tickm in all utxty Irerbns to 951E Staaard Precis malaham pry density (ASNI 06908 -78 w AASHTO 1-99) Iron IN as son. le within 3 fort .1 IN grasp arfea and 10016 Slandar0 Plata mairrbm pry pmaty in IN 1.- 3 1st. P,wis deNt, l.sto in W. and MI. aactl ashou" facungt -bat and oawhNnlL N best w cc,~;" last is reaobed la awry too fw of load, at w,tea adsrels not sCminq lA lest. 6. Nally LN Engims, o' any di capOnG6 S T O R Y 5 E W E R N O T E S 1. Untamed all -n.ia isoicso d. m 4 It. dump« (Lt) In -acso ,oidpatl a.n«ol, sb b hso ac as adorn doss, eatelmvalrt 2. Us a NaNh R -1733 frays with ys'C' radio p,adL. s .PPratl dud. an at, and, "N. Us KMMh R- 3067 -DR/01. aepbq with auto pet a app,awd dud, on all Catch Marto at NT I¢aua,L 3. Tip IN � .scups Of a. 11,rgNtl RCP stem owe, .,a a of two Carlow W pat fa.dsNn o« is - ThY ,slr+m,r«ll .apk. to oath uNtrtldr ape do had c- -soli and Ins"" hooded than pars an Ibis as IioO a aoarb fa ad pips bryo the 12" in damp «. 4. R -danced "Weds spa IN Nlilrp..IwW cant.- la IN C_uiNns ds of IN Statlad Spea+6cel'aM Ian ".1anord ,, Sewer Rpe. ASTM Oesigno6s C76 Daps C .its rcJe, rsinfant g Io IN aim of as .poc;Nd. Unlm eU«.Y. sosaYYd, /asoorood coaeds seep Ppe and sac sodas tau law a tm R-4 rs,Faad rubes b'-riq panel 7On1 cvetruettl In aaacroano .lu ASTY 0361 -65I. .inn dinandiob a000 insu" a .Mesh ac Y..=T Staa.ry Plots No. 3006F. fN paYSl -1 s ci c in am- .ealiac. ConarM os to de ja1W solos N Class 5 Tick Woo JocUng Pia• E R O S I O N C 0 N 7 R 0 L N O T E S 1. I,nd lilt tams at tl,. I.-tCa sown on IN Pc_ Clio to .pinarq eohno-ti... a.tp .21 fence .ids a past spacing W . Ill a Ira. Orlw pads d Yap 2 fat iMe IN 9roa,L Andy 1IW ad laws fade it a VWh (a bon 6 nwM dap and 6 Inch, wide) dug e, IN ,plop• sis of !N .appal pops. La he bpi. ih IN thew, and Iha, a.cw. and aorq.al. YeYS on, daunt W UY '.Mi. ot a Ienu pal Al Pip- wades IN fade p Yap 6 --- fob It Pia, so aav,elp'ata, d to the lea past. Sit sadin9 pogo sped N 2 inch soon or -W ha,dsoad. Pit. a pandas T- o U -spice psi pads. T- a U -stllen sdsN port. .N6 d.igd Nt Ira Ilan 1.0 lb a• lineal fact. Palo sots Ira, a minimum "th of 30 loch.i ow phis. depth. Gso N lope pall mat IN 13 ST. S. CB 1s ST. S. CB TOP - 851.4 TOP = 857.4 INV. 846.75 INV. = 846.65 - _,.�` -", _•.'ran` CONSTRUCT NEW ST. S. 15 ST. S. MH MH ON EXISTING 36" - STORM SEWER TOP - 848.6 840.84 2. Ro e OI tamp«arl, wpth fc. so-wak and ai.d.p-- .roses and s.bNnl cem,.1 d hi afw [N ads No ..."Its, find pea6saii., x TMOe spina Ia>wp"' �istao a TE PORAIM ROCK COISTRUCTION ENTRANCE t cn pant wlan wni:W sit Is acn.tnrcllon ail.. Ys 1 b 2 inch dbm.i« yak torn YNOOT G -1 o dNOOT CA-2 cows oppropde. Pbce as 1N Oppr.pata in a lay., at ball 6 inches lha perm tN anti..khh el IN antnrce. E.- IN roCY a Krone! dl lasso 50 lap into IN esuVlnelien Ana. uY gtlhn"No fabric T NNa me ogglegals in erdeh to a...ni mipral:pn of pal into Inc racy fern bob.. a, BLOCK ANO ROCK SEOIMENI FILTER so ea Na act,hn mild. .h;.h ,swiss n I Irani dild,,th I arse. Bfal, and Rock MM Fift- schist so open -..n conchal. meson, YL -�•ira scroon (0.5' .. 6 q ), aM awlba -1 PION «. npdany bfaclto I -wNsm, ac ~ .ids canal IN catchlr®n inlet. Pleasi airs pooch arauN p,. Pori od to the is Of IN bleak ba.ia before IN rack is oaC.d. IN a,s„ ads to Phnnod tN rock. Non barq .aantl tnrangh IN blocs.. Plan yak apa'nso tn..in m,sn to IN too of In. dxk.. Its 1 to 3 inct, dlemsta roc. torch as YNOOT CA-1. CA-2, R CA-3 CNrr A"noW . INIa tac eaane d 8' blab in one b Ism a barb, Mipnl I 16'. 5. Remaw dl oL eac ■aliment. ✓ IcFN a ollana depasdtl onto oaho,aht «.a. R.. -1 .N. de an a siy Nsio Ihro,,, -t IN .uMbn of IN caNplwllon. Cltln pawl raea.p,s w shaping a a. pi q. Sl,w waning b dbsd acy altar s. ;-.I N. bas, n,Ned by Norairq a - .aaairq. 5. PYws a 15' thick law of MAIDDY SIaNp7N Spaeilipd'nn 3601.2A Pas N rioap ands a 7A' thick WW of MNOW StaN«d Specification 3601.2.6 gas delta _t.,w d locsoiaa in icots an N. pan in aI-- with MNDOT Sl~d Soai1'cotbn 2511. Gcataso:b Iitg, nblcriel may ve used in f OI 9ranwlo, I ;- -law. Install riprop a sl,wr, a, MKDOT StasaN Pbte No. 31338 and Ply of Eason StaNa,d Plate Ka. 260 far 1N pis of pis Mated. Far Pipe sus pope« pan 12' a--. 1. -imam pac. 111 d Roast ape fill« chop slap N Ys flan mso hsh irtl I« 12' diOrNds, spas. 7. Part- s .ro.ipe .-I. prpclim in aaaeora .ill, the nabade _11INd in IN b.p manaparrnsol pales Nraboole 'Pretedinp wan:« Ow6y in undon A . Ntsteded by sob W.Notl. Pdlwien (antral Apanw. 8. Clean sl as lanparoy sedissoldo6o, bOsiN to de used a _. . spa 0udiy n-n"- basin sole IN sours ,"op. Ns ~9- final - a6souaL 9. fansbat 0. propped tia ftM sun groda NI goatling 3:1 (3 hoddonlal b 1 vsrliacl). STORMWATEA MANAGEMENT AREA Too T.D.1ay Drdnapa Also . 7.09 was - 0.01108 '2 Dpipn Stara - SCS. 24 -1. Typo I: 100 -YR Ni9l, snots, Llano - rB.u3.11 Ira -Wt the St", 1ra'wra Ulildtl - 0.2137 aas-fl. 100-18 Psi- O«alpn,art Od.Nrpa don Pars - 2.LQ ass 100 -TR pro- O..aoon ad Pahang, 24 24.05 alp �aad�aK+a ,wan J �I I u 4nocAtm ,arson SCALE ,secs -n ,• _ 100• Slow � 1 0 L it OFF -SITE PONDING DETAIL '•►[:• ,`,�,ic �I�� :. •;acv= :.�!� ®._/ M I K,y._ s a�n r ce.a- -a G Ian I. a. 1 2}- OAa I E' A9f f_1 �� �L SPa , 1 T 085" i6 n B -SZ - •(fill- �y� p �B - 0852 '-'°i SILT FENCE 3 �) 7 T -679 8 -87" r - e7e \ B ST. S. CB 0874.5/ TOP = 863.55 INV. 858.52 2 S V E A4� • E F` z� 9e0i 0'2 T - 876\ 8 - 873/ °79.7 9 1 ST. S. Ce TOP = 860.19 INV. = 854.24 101 ST. S. CB TOP - 855.0 INV. - 850.05 T .0867 T 0867 a% i T - 0867 AI . ee.� GA 4. c _72.5 -:c en .7 IIN n5g.23 AREA OF TEMP. FLOOOINC 100 YR. PEAK ELEVATION HIGH WATER - 653.14 le 11 ST. S. CB TOP - 854.0 INV, a 849.75 P S. CB OP 854.0 V. - 850.0 C E N E A A l N 0 f E S: t. Eselig bamday, location. topopaprie. ona .toy iNa.aua, lien on Y abn b Iron a asset w Inch- I" P,IUar, Olsac, apes dew 7/6/97. 2. The bCpiah,s at ul'Ai1:e• ecn, an apaasirNl. ant,. DIN, 12ilia may .sip snich haw hart peen sh ton. Contact CORNER STATE ONE CALL at 454 -0002 in the moue aro., a 1 -600- 252-1165 10, Ira 1. .(tat adani.- so leap so •an+q pow hoard baforst begin" any con.brwtiac. 3. MI Is- opal pectic.. eNw- as b Ntlorn d aura .Nm . h,,W- indicated. I. PCdam W au6t7 R,k th atcordarea site IN Ely d Edins apeaRi {ions. S. Comsat tickm in all utxty Irerbns to 951E Staaard Precis malaham pry density (ASNI 06908 -78 w AASHTO 1-99) Iron IN as son. le within 3 fort .1 IN grasp arfea and 10016 Slandar0 Plata mairrbm pry pmaty in IN 1.- 3 1st. P,wis deNt, l.sto in W. and MI. aactl ashou" facungt -bat and oawhNnlL N best w cc,~;" last is reaobed la awry too fw of load, at w,tea adsrels not sCminq lA lest. 6. Nally LN Engims, o' any di capOnG6 S T O R Y 5 E W E R N O T E S 1. Untamed all -n.ia isoicso d. m 4 It. dump« (Lt) In -acso ,oidpatl a.n«ol, sb b hso ac as adorn doss, eatelmvalrt 2. Us a NaNh R -1733 frays with ys'C' radio p,adL. s .PPratl dud. an at, and, "N. Us KMMh R- 3067 -DR/01. aepbq with auto pet a app,awd dud, on all Catch Marto at NT I¢aua,L 3. Tip IN � .scups Of a. 11,rgNtl RCP stem owe, .,a a of two Carlow W pat fa.dsNn o« is - ThY ,slr+m,r«ll .apk. to oath uNtrtldr ape do had c- -soli and Ins"" hooded than pars an Ibis as IioO a aoarb fa ad pips bryo the 12" in damp «. 4. R -danced "Weds spa IN Nlilrp..IwW cant.- la IN C_uiNns ds of IN Statlad Spea+6cel'aM Ian ".1anord ,, Sewer Rpe. ASTM Oesigno6s C76 Daps C .its rcJe, rsinfant g Io IN aim of as .poc;Nd. Unlm eU«.Y. sosaYYd, /asoorood coaeds seep Ppe and sac sodas tau law a tm R-4 rs,Faad rubes b'-riq panel 7On1 cvetruettl In aaacroano .lu ASTY 0361 -65I. .inn dinandiob a000 insu" a .Mesh ac Y..=T Staa.ry Plots No. 3006F. fN paYSl -1 s ci c in am- .ealiac. ConarM os to de ja1W solos N Class 5 Tick Woo JocUng Pia• E R O S I O N C 0 N 7 R 0 L N O T E S 1. I,nd lilt tams at tl,. I.-tCa sown on IN Pc_ Clio to .pinarq eohno-ti... a.tp .21 fence .ids a past spacing W . Ill a Ira. Orlw pads d Yap 2 fat iMe IN 9roa,L Andy 1IW ad laws fade it a VWh (a bon 6 nwM dap and 6 Inch, wide) dug e, IN ,plop• sis of !N .appal pops. La he bpi. ih IN thew, and Iha, a.cw. and aorq.al. YeYS on, daunt W UY '.Mi. ot a Ienu pal Al Pip- wades IN fade p Yap 6 --- fob It Pia, so aav,elp'ata, d to the lea past. Sit sadin9 pogo sped N 2 inch soon or -W ha,dsoad. Pit. a pandas T- o U -spice psi pads. T- a U -stllen sdsN port. .N6 d.igd Nt Ira Ilan 1.0 lb a• lineal fact. Palo sots Ira, a minimum "th of 30 loch.i ow phis. depth. Gso N lope pall mat IN 13 ST. S. CB 1s ST. S. CB TOP - 851.4 TOP = 857.4 INV. 846.75 INV. = 846.65 - _,.�` -", _•.'ran` CONSTRUCT NEW ST. S. 15 ST. S. MH MH ON EXISTING 36" - STORM SEWER TOP - 848.6 840.84 2. Ro e OI tamp«arl, wpth fc. so-wak and ai.d.p-- .roses and s.bNnl cem,.1 d hi afw [N ads No ..."Its, find pea6saii., x TMOe spina Ia>wp"' �istao a TE PORAIM ROCK COISTRUCTION ENTRANCE t cn pant wlan wni:W sit Is acn.tnrcllon ail.. Ys 1 b 2 inch dbm.i« yak torn YNOOT G -1 o dNOOT CA-2 cows oppropde. Pbce as 1N Oppr.pata in a lay., at ball 6 inches lha perm tN anti..khh el IN antnrce. E.- IN roCY a Krone! dl lasso 50 lap into IN esuVlnelien Ana. uY gtlhn"No fabric T NNa me ogglegals in erdeh to a...ni mipral:pn of pal into Inc racy fern bob.. a, BLOCK ANO ROCK SEOIMENI FILTER so ea Na act,hn mild. .h;.h ,swiss n I Irani dild,,th I arse. Bfal, and Rock MM Fift- schist so open -..n conchal. meson, YL -�•ira scroon (0.5' .. 6 q ), aM awlba -1 PION «. npdany bfaclto I -wNsm, ac ~ .ids canal IN catchlr®n inlet. Pleasi airs pooch arauN p,. Pori od to the is Of IN bleak ba.ia before IN rack is oaC.d. IN a,s„ ads to Phnnod tN rock. Non barq .aantl tnrangh IN blocs.. Plan yak apa'nso tn..in m,sn to IN too of In. dxk.. Its 1 to 3 inct, dlemsta roc. torch as YNOOT CA-1. CA-2, R CA-3 CNrr A"noW . INIa tac eaane d 8' blab in one b Ism a barb, Mipnl I 16'. 5. Remaw dl oL eac ■aliment. ✓ IcFN a ollana depasdtl onto oaho,aht «.a. R.. -1 .N. de an a siy Nsio Ihro,,, -t IN .uMbn of IN caNplwllon. Cltln pawl raea.p,s w shaping a a. pi q. Sl,w waning b dbsd acy altar s. ;-.I N. bas, n,Ned by Norairq a - .aaairq. 5. PYws a 15' thick law of MAIDDY SIaNp7N Spaeilipd'nn 3601.2A Pas N rioap ands a 7A' thick WW of MNOW StaN«d Specification 3601.2.6 gas delta _t.,w d locsoiaa in icots an N. pan in aI-- with MNDOT Sl~d Soai1'cotbn 2511. Gcataso:b Iitg, nblcriel may ve used in f OI 9ranwlo, I ;- -law. Install riprop a sl,wr, a, MKDOT StasaN Pbte No. 31338 and Ply of Eason StaNa,d Plate Ka. 260 far 1N pis of pis Mated. Far Pipe sus pope« pan 12' a--. 1. -imam pac. 111 d Roast ape fill« chop slap N Ys flan mso hsh irtl I« 12' diOrNds, spas. 7. Part- s .ro.ipe .-I. prpclim in aaaeora .ill, the nabade _11INd in IN b.p manaparrnsol pales Nraboole 'Pretedinp wan:« Ow6y in undon A . Ntsteded by sob W.Notl. Pdlwien (antral Apanw. 8. Clean sl as lanparoy sedissoldo6o, bOsiN to de used a _. . spa 0udiy n-n"- basin sole IN sours ,"op. Ns ~9- final - a6souaL 9. fansbat 0. propped tia ftM sun groda NI goatling 3:1 (3 hoddonlal b 1 vsrliacl). STORMWATEA MANAGEMENT AREA Too T.D.1ay Drdnapa Also . 7.09 was - 0.01108 '2 Dpipn Stara - SCS. 24 -1. Typo I: 100 -YR Ni9l, snots, Llano - rB.u3.11 Ira -Wt the St", 1ra'wra Ulildtl - 0.2137 aas-fl. 100-18 Psi- O«alpn,art Od.Nrpa don Pars - 2.LQ ass 100 -TR pro- O..aoon ad Pahang, 24 24.05 alp �aad�aK+a ,wan J �I I u 4nocAtm ,arson SCALE ,secs -n ,• _ 100• Slow � 1 0 L it OFF -SITE PONDING DETAIL s a�n r ce.a- -a G Ian I. a. 1 2}- OAa I E' A9f f_1 �� �L SPa , 1 T 085" i6 n B -SZ - •(fill- �y� p �B - 0852 '-'°i SILT FENCE 3 �) 7 T -679 8 -87" r - e7e \ B ST. S. CB 0874.5/ TOP = 863.55 INV. 858.52 2 S V E A4� • E F` z� 9e0i 0'2 T - 876\ 8 - 873/ °79.7 9 1 ST. S. Ce TOP = 860.19 INV. = 854.24 101 ST. S. CB TOP - 855.0 INV. - 850.05 T .0867 T 0867 a% i T - 0867 AI . ee.� GA 4. c _72.5 -:c en .7 IIN n5g.23 AREA OF TEMP. FLOOOINC 100 YR. PEAK ELEVATION HIGH WATER - 653.14 le 11 ST. S. CB TOP - 854.0 INV, a 849.75 P S. CB OP 854.0 V. - 850.0 C E N E A A l N 0 f E S: t. Eselig bamday, location. topopaprie. ona .toy iNa.aua, lien on Y abn b Iron a asset w Inch- I" P,IUar, Olsac, apes dew 7/6/97. 2. The bCpiah,s at ul'Ai1:e• ecn, an apaasirNl. ant,. DIN, 12ilia may .sip snich haw hart peen sh ton. Contact CORNER STATE ONE CALL at 454 -0002 in the moue aro., a 1 -600- 252-1165 10, Ira 1. .(tat adani.- so leap so •an+q pow hoard baforst begin" any con.brwtiac. 3. MI Is- opal pectic.. eNw- as b Ntlorn d aura .Nm . h,,W- indicated. I. PCdam W au6t7 R,k th atcordarea site IN Ely d Edins apeaRi {ions. S. Comsat tickm in all utxty Irerbns to 951E Staaard Precis malaham pry density (ASNI 06908 -78 w AASHTO 1-99) Iron IN as son. le within 3 fort .1 IN grasp arfea and 10016 Slandar0 Plata mairrbm pry pmaty in IN 1.- 3 1st. P,wis deNt, l.sto in W. and MI. aactl ashou" facungt -bat and oawhNnlL N best w cc,~;" last is reaobed la awry too fw of load, at w,tea adsrels not sCminq lA lest. 6. Nally LN Engims, o' any di capOnG6 S T O R Y 5 E W E R N O T E S 1. Untamed all -n.ia isoicso d. m 4 It. dump« (Lt) In -acso ,oidpatl a.n«ol, sb b hso ac as adorn doss, eatelmvalrt 2. Us a NaNh R -1733 frays with ys'C' radio p,adL. s .PPratl dud. an at, and, "N. Us KMMh R- 3067 -DR/01. aepbq with auto pet a app,awd dud, on all Catch Marto at NT I¢aua,L 3. Tip IN � .scups Of a. 11,rgNtl RCP stem owe, .,a a of two Carlow W pat fa.dsNn o« is - ThY ,slr+m,r«ll .apk. to oath uNtrtldr ape do had c- -soli and Ins"" hooded than pars an Ibis as IioO a aoarb fa ad pips bryo the 12" in damp «. 4. R -danced "Weds spa IN Nlilrp..IwW cant.- la IN C_uiNns ds of IN Statlad Spea+6cel'aM Ian ".1anord ,, Sewer Rpe. ASTM Oesigno6s C76 Daps C .its rcJe, rsinfant g Io IN aim of as .poc;Nd. Unlm eU«.Y. sosaYYd, /asoorood coaeds seep Ppe and sac sodas tau law a tm R-4 rs,Faad rubes b'-riq panel 7On1 cvetruettl In aaacroano .lu ASTY 0361 -65I. .inn dinandiob a000 insu" a .Mesh ac Y..=T Staa.ry Plots No. 3006F. fN paYSl -1 s ci c in am- .ealiac. ConarM os to de ja1W solos N Class 5 Tick Woo JocUng Pia• E R O S I O N C 0 N 7 R 0 L N O T E S 1. I,nd lilt tams at tl,. I.-tCa sown on IN Pc_ Clio to .pinarq eohno-ti... a.tp .21 fence .ids a past spacing W . Ill a Ira. Orlw pads d Yap 2 fat iMe IN 9roa,L Andy 1IW ad laws fade it a VWh (a bon 6 nwM dap and 6 Inch, wide) dug e, IN ,plop• sis of !N .appal pops. La he bpi. ih IN thew, and Iha, a.cw. and aorq.al. YeYS on, daunt W UY '.Mi. ot a Ienu pal Al Pip- wades IN fade p Yap 6 --- fob It Pia, so aav,elp'ata, d to the lea past. Sit sadin9 pogo sped N 2 inch soon or -W ha,dsoad. Pit. a pandas T- o U -spice psi pads. T- a U -stllen sdsN port. .N6 d.igd Nt Ira Ilan 1.0 lb a• lineal fact. Palo sots Ira, a minimum "th of 30 loch.i ow phis. depth. Gso N lope pall mat IN 13 ST. S. CB 1s ST. S. CB TOP - 851.4 TOP = 857.4 INV. 846.75 INV. = 846.65 - _,.�` -", _•.'ran` CONSTRUCT NEW ST. S. 15 ST. S. MH MH ON EXISTING 36" - STORM SEWER TOP - 848.6 840.84 2. Ro e OI tamp«arl, wpth fc. so-wak and ai.d.p-- .roses and s.bNnl cem,.1 d hi afw [N ads No ..."Its, find pea6saii., x TMOe spina Ia>wp"' �istao a TE PORAIM ROCK COISTRUCTION ENTRANCE t cn pant wlan wni:W sit Is acn.tnrcllon ail.. Ys 1 b 2 inch dbm.i« yak torn YNOOT G -1 o dNOOT CA-2 cows oppropde. Pbce as 1N Oppr.pata in a lay., at ball 6 inches lha perm tN anti..khh el IN antnrce. E.- IN roCY a Krone! dl lasso 50 lap into IN esuVlnelien Ana. uY gtlhn"No fabric T NNa me ogglegals in erdeh to a...ni mipral:pn of pal into Inc racy fern bob.. a, BLOCK ANO ROCK SEOIMENI FILTER so ea Na act,hn mild. .h;.h ,swiss n I Irani dild,,th I arse. Bfal, and Rock MM Fift- schist so open -..n conchal. meson, YL -�•ira scroon (0.5' .. 6 q ), aM awlba -1 PION «. npdany bfaclto I -wNsm, ac ~ .ids canal IN catchlr®n inlet. Pleasi airs pooch arauN p,. Pori od to the is Of IN bleak ba.ia before IN rack is oaC.d. IN a,s„ ads to Phnnod tN rock. Non barq .aantl tnrangh IN blocs.. Plan yak apa'nso tn..in m,sn to IN too of In. dxk.. Its 1 to 3 inct, dlemsta roc. torch as YNOOT CA-1. CA-2, R CA-3 CNrr A"noW . INIa tac eaane d 8' blab in one b Ism a barb, Mipnl I 16'. 5. Remaw dl oL eac ■aliment. ✓ IcFN a ollana depasdtl onto oaho,aht «.a. R.. -1 .N. de an a siy Nsio Ihro,,, -t IN .uMbn of IN caNplwllon. Cltln pawl raea.p,s w shaping a a. pi q. Sl,w waning b dbsd acy altar s. ;-.I N. bas, n,Ned by Norairq a - .aaairq. 5. PYws a 15' thick law of MAIDDY SIaNp7N Spaeilipd'nn 3601.2A Pas N rioap ands a 7A' thick WW of MNOW StaN«d Specification 3601.2.6 gas delta _t.,w d locsoiaa in icots an N. pan in aI-- with MNDOT Sl~d Soai1'cotbn 2511. Gcataso:b Iitg, nblcriel may ve used in f OI 9ranwlo, I ;- -law. Install riprop a sl,wr, a, MKDOT StasaN Pbte No. 31338 and Ply of Eason StaNa,d Plate Ka. 260 far 1N pis of pis Mated. Far Pipe sus pope« pan 12' a--. 1. -imam pac. 111 d Roast ape fill« chop slap N Ys flan mso hsh irtl I« 12' diOrNds, spas. 7. Part- s .ro.ipe .-I. prpclim in aaaeora .ill, the nabade _11INd in IN b.p manaparrnsol pales Nraboole 'Pretedinp wan:« Ow6y in undon A . Ntsteded by sob W.Notl. Pdlwien (antral Apanw. 8. Clean sl as lanparoy sedissoldo6o, bOsiN to de used a _. . spa 0udiy n-n"- basin sole IN sours ,"op. Ns ~9- final - a6souaL 9. fansbat 0. propped tia ftM sun groda NI goatling 3:1 (3 hoddonlal b 1 vsrliacl). STORMWATEA MANAGEMENT AREA Too T.D.1ay Drdnapa Also . 7.09 was - 0.01108 '2 Dpipn Stara - SCS. 24 -1. Typo I: 100 -YR Ni9l, snots, Llano - rB.u3.11 Ira -Wt the St", 1ra'wra Ulildtl - 0.2137 aas-fl. 100-18 Psi- O«alpn,art Od.Nrpa don Pars - 2.LQ ass 100 -TR pro- O..aoon ad Pahang, 24 24.05 alp �aad�aK+a ,wan J �I I u 4nocAtm ,arson SCALE ,secs -n ,• _ 100• Slow � 1 0 L it OFF -SITE PONDING DETAIL 9 1 ST. S. Ce TOP = 860.19 INV. = 854.24 101 ST. S. CB TOP - 855.0 INV. - 850.05 T .0867 T 0867 a% i T - 0867 AI . ee.� GA 4. c _72.5 -:c en .7 IIN n5g.23 AREA OF TEMP. FLOOOINC 100 YR. PEAK ELEVATION HIGH WATER - 653.14 le 11 ST. S. CB TOP - 854.0 INV, a 849.75 P S. CB OP 854.0 V. - 850.0 C E N E A A l N 0 f E S: t. Eselig bamday, location. topopaprie. ona .toy iNa.aua, lien on Y abn b Iron a asset w Inch- I" P,IUar, Olsac, apes dew 7/6/97. 2. The bCpiah,s at ul'Ai1:e• ecn, an apaasirNl. ant,. DIN, 12ilia may .sip snich haw hart peen sh ton. Contact CORNER STATE ONE CALL at 454 -0002 in the moue aro., a 1 -600- 252-1165 10, Ira 1. .(tat adani.- so leap so •an+q pow hoard baforst begin" any con.brwtiac. 3. MI Is- opal pectic.. eNw- as b Ntlorn d aura .Nm . h,,W- indicated. I. PCdam W au6t7 R,k th atcordarea site IN Ely d Edins apeaRi {ions. S. Comsat tickm in all utxty Irerbns to 951E Staaard Precis malaham pry density (ASNI 06908 -78 w AASHTO 1-99) Iron IN as son. le within 3 fort .1 IN grasp arfea and 10016 Slandar0 Plata mairrbm pry pmaty in IN 1.- 3 1st. P,wis deNt, l.sto in W. and MI. aactl ashou" facungt -bat and oawhNnlL N best w cc,~;" last is reaobed la awry too fw of load, at w,tea adsrels not sCminq lA lest. 6. Nally LN Engims, o' any di capOnG6 S T O R Y 5 E W E R N O T E S 1. Untamed all -n.ia isoicso d. m 4 It. dump« (Lt) In -acso ,oidpatl a.n«ol, sb b hso ac as adorn doss, eatelmvalrt 2. Us a NaNh R -1733 frays with ys'C' radio p,adL. s .PPratl dud. an at, and, "N. Us KMMh R- 3067 -DR/01. aepbq with auto pet a app,awd dud, on all Catch Marto at NT I¢aua,L 3. Tip IN � .scups Of a. 11,rgNtl RCP stem owe, .,a a of two Carlow W pat fa.dsNn o« is - ThY ,slr+m,r«ll .apk. to oath uNtrtldr ape do had c- -soli and Ins"" hooded than pars an Ibis as IioO a aoarb fa ad pips bryo the 12" in damp «. 4. R -danced "Weds spa IN Nlilrp..IwW cant.- la IN C_uiNns ds of IN Statlad Spea+6cel'aM Ian ".1anord ,, Sewer Rpe. ASTM Oesigno6s C76 Daps C .its rcJe, rsinfant g Io IN aim of as .poc;Nd. Unlm eU«.Y. sosaYYd, /asoorood coaeds seep Ppe and sac sodas tau law a tm R-4 rs,Faad rubes b'-riq panel 7On1 cvetruettl In aaacroano .lu ASTY 0361 -65I. .inn dinandiob a000 insu" a .Mesh ac Y..=T Staa.ry Plots No. 3006F. fN paYSl -1 s ci c in am- .ealiac. ConarM os to de ja1W solos N Class 5 Tick Woo JocUng Pia• E R O S I O N C 0 N 7 R 0 L N O T E S 1. I,nd lilt tams at tl,. I.-tCa sown on IN Pc_ Clio to .pinarq eohno-ti... a.tp .21 fence .ids a past spacing W . Ill a Ira. Orlw pads d Yap 2 fat iMe IN 9roa,L Andy 1IW ad laws fade it a VWh (a bon 6 nwM dap and 6 Inch, wide) dug e, IN ,plop• sis of !N .appal pops. La he bpi. ih IN thew, and Iha, a.cw. and aorq.al. YeYS on, daunt W UY '.Mi. ot a Ienu pal Al Pip- wades IN fade p Yap 6 --- fob It Pia, so aav,elp'ata, d to the lea past. Sit sadin9 pogo sped N 2 inch soon or -W ha,dsoad. Pit. a pandas T- o U -spice psi pads. T- a U -stllen sdsN port. .N6 d.igd Nt Ira Ilan 1.0 lb a• lineal fact. Palo sots Ira, a minimum "th of 30 loch.i ow phis. depth. Gso N lope pall mat IN 13 ST. S. CB 1s ST. S. CB TOP - 851.4 TOP = 857.4 INV. 846.75 INV. = 846.65 - _,.�` -", _•.'ran` CONSTRUCT NEW ST. S. 15 ST. S. MH MH ON EXISTING 36" - STORM SEWER TOP - 848.6 840.84 2. Ro e OI tamp«arl, wpth fc. so-wak and ai.d.p-- .roses and s.bNnl cem,.1 d hi afw [N ads No ..."Its, find pea6saii., x TMOe spina Ia>wp"' �istao a TE PORAIM ROCK COISTRUCTION ENTRANCE t cn pant wlan wni:W sit Is acn.tnrcllon ail.. Ys 1 b 2 inch dbm.i« yak torn YNOOT G -1 o dNOOT CA-2 cows oppropde. Pbce as 1N Oppr.pata in a lay., at ball 6 inches lha perm tN anti..khh el IN antnrce. E.- IN roCY a Krone! dl lasso 50 lap into IN esuVlnelien Ana. uY gtlhn"No fabric T NNa me ogglegals in erdeh to a...ni mipral:pn of pal into Inc racy fern bob.. a, BLOCK ANO ROCK SEOIMENI FILTER so ea Na act,hn mild. .h;.h ,swiss n I Irani dild,,th I arse. Bfal, and Rock MM Fift- schist so open -..n conchal. meson, YL -�•ira scroon (0.5' .. 6 q ), aM awlba -1 PION «. npdany bfaclto I -wNsm, ac ~ .ids canal IN catchlr®n inlet. Pleasi airs pooch arauN p,. Pori od to the is Of IN bleak ba.ia before IN rack is oaC.d. IN a,s„ ads to Phnnod tN rock. Non barq .aantl tnrangh IN blocs.. Plan yak apa'nso tn..in m,sn to IN too of In. dxk.. Its 1 to 3 inct, dlemsta roc. torch as YNOOT CA-1. CA-2, R CA-3 CNrr A"noW . INIa tac eaane d 8' blab in one b Ism a barb, Mipnl I 16'. 5. Remaw dl oL eac ■aliment. ✓ IcFN a ollana depasdtl onto oaho,aht «.a. R.. -1 .N. de an a siy Nsio Ihro,,, -t IN .uMbn of IN caNplwllon. Cltln pawl raea.p,s w shaping a a. pi q. Sl,w waning b dbsd acy altar s. ;-.I N. bas, n,Ned by Norairq a - .aaairq. 5. PYws a 15' thick law of MAIDDY SIaNp7N Spaeilipd'nn 3601.2A Pas N rioap ands a 7A' thick WW of MNOW StaN«d Specification 3601.2.6 gas delta _t.,w d locsoiaa in icots an N. pan in aI-- with MNDOT Sl~d Soai1'cotbn 2511. Gcataso:b Iitg, nblcriel may ve used in f OI 9ranwlo, I ;- -law. Install riprop a sl,wr, a, MKDOT StasaN Pbte No. 31338 and Ply of Eason StaNa,d Plate Ka. 260 far 1N pis of pis Mated. Far Pipe sus pope« pan 12' a--. 1. -imam pac. 111 d Roast ape fill« chop slap N Ys flan mso hsh irtl I« 12' diOrNds, spas. 7. Part- s .ro.ipe .-I. prpclim in aaaeora .ill, the nabade _11INd in IN b.p manaparrnsol pales Nraboole 'Pretedinp wan:« Ow6y in undon A . Ntsteded by sob W.Notl. Pdlwien (antral Apanw. 8. Clean sl as lanparoy sedissoldo6o, bOsiN to de used a _. . spa 0udiy n-n"- basin sole IN sours ,"op. Ns ~9- final - a6souaL 9. fansbat 0. propped tia ftM sun groda NI goatling 3:1 (3 hoddonlal b 1 vsrliacl). STORMWATEA MANAGEMENT AREA Too T.D.1ay Drdnapa Also . 7.09 was - 0.01108 '2 Dpipn Stara - SCS. 24 -1. Typo I: 100 -YR Ni9l, snots, Llano - rB.u3.11 Ira -Wt the St", 1ra'wra Ulildtl - 0.2137 aas-fl. 100-18 Psi- O«alpn,art Od.Nrpa don Pars - 2.LQ ass 100 -TR pro- O..aoon ad Pahang, 24 24.05 alp �aad�aK+a ,wan J �I I u 4nocAtm ,arson SCALE ,secs -n ,• _ 100• Slow � 1 0 L it OFF -SITE PONDING DETAIL 2. Ro e OI tamp«arl, wpth fc. so-wak and ai.d.p-- .roses and s.bNnl cem,.1 d hi afw [N ads No ..."Its, find pea6saii., x TMOe spina Ia>wp"' �istao a TE PORAIM ROCK COISTRUCTION ENTRANCE t cn pant wlan wni:W sit Is acn.tnrcllon ail.. Ys 1 b 2 inch dbm.i« yak torn YNOOT G -1 o dNOOT CA-2 cows oppropde. Pbce as 1N Oppr.pata in a lay., at ball 6 inches lha perm tN anti..khh el IN antnrce. E.- IN roCY a Krone! dl lasso 50 lap into IN esuVlnelien Ana. uY gtlhn"No fabric T NNa me ogglegals in erdeh to a...ni mipral:pn of pal into Inc racy fern bob.. a, BLOCK ANO ROCK SEOIMENI FILTER so ea Na act,hn mild. .h;.h ,swiss n I Irani dild,,th I arse. Bfal, and Rock MM Fift- schist so open -..n conchal. meson, YL -�•ira scroon (0.5' .. 6 q ), aM awlba -1 PION «. npdany bfaclto I -wNsm, ac ~ .ids canal IN catchlr®n inlet. Pleasi airs pooch arauN p,. Pori od to the is Of IN bleak ba.ia before IN rack is oaC.d. IN a,s„ ads to Phnnod tN rock. Non barq .aantl tnrangh IN blocs.. Plan yak apa'nso tn..in m,sn to IN too of In. dxk.. Its 1 to 3 inct, dlemsta roc. torch as YNOOT CA-1. CA-2, R CA-3 CNrr A"noW . INIa tac eaane d 8' blab in one b Ism a barb, Mipnl I 16'. 5. Remaw dl oL eac ■aliment. ✓ IcFN a ollana depasdtl onto oaho,aht «.a. R.. -1 .N. de an a siy Nsio Ihro,,, -t IN .uMbn of IN caNplwllon. Cltln pawl raea.p,s w shaping a a. pi q. Sl,w waning b dbsd acy altar s. ;-.I N. bas, n,Ned by Norairq a - .aaairq. 5. PYws a 15' thick law of MAIDDY SIaNp7N Spaeilipd'nn 3601.2A Pas N rioap ands a 7A' thick WW of MNOW StaN«d Specification 3601.2.6 gas delta _t.,w d locsoiaa in icots an N. pan in aI-- with MNDOT Sl~d Soai1'cotbn 2511. Gcataso:b Iitg, nblcriel may ve used in f OI 9ranwlo, I ;- -law. Install riprop a sl,wr, a, MKDOT StasaN Pbte No. 31338 and Ply of Eason StaNa,d Plate Ka. 260 far 1N pis of pis Mated. Far Pipe sus pope« pan 12' a--. 1. -imam pac. 111 d Roast ape fill« chop slap N Ys flan mso hsh irtl I« 12' diOrNds, spas. 7. Part- s .ro.ipe .-I. prpclim in aaaeora .ill, the nabade _11INd in IN b.p manaparrnsol pales Nraboole 'Pretedinp wan:« Ow6y in undon A . Ntsteded by sob W.Notl. Pdlwien (antral Apanw. 8. Clean sl as lanparoy sedissoldo6o, bOsiN to de used a _. . spa 0udiy n-n"- basin sole IN sours ,"op. Ns ~9- final - a6souaL 9. fansbat 0. propped tia ftM sun groda NI goatling 3:1 (3 hoddonlal b 1 vsrliacl). STORMWATEA MANAGEMENT AREA Too T.D.1ay Drdnapa Also . 7.09 was - 0.01108 '2 Dpipn Stara - SCS. 24 -1. Typo I: 100 -YR Ni9l, snots, Llano - rB.u3.11 Ira -Wt the St", 1ra'wra Ulildtl - 0.2137 aas-fl. 100-18 Psi- O«alpn,art Od.Nrpa don Pars - 2.LQ ass 100 -TR pro- O..aoon ad Pahang, 24 24.05 alp �aad�aK+a ,wan J �I I u 4nocAtm ,arson SCALE ,secs -n ,• _ 100• Slow � 1 0 L it OFF -SITE PONDING DETAIL TOP 670.0 INV. = 866.0 12- R.C.P. ST. S. O 1.0076 :MPORARY ROCK ENTRANCE CONNECT TO EXISTING ST. S. CATCH BASIN INV. 665.00 ADJUST TOP OF EXIST. CB. NEW TOP 870.6 BANDON BY REMOVING EXISTING 971-4 STREET STORM SEWER. ULKHEAD MANHOLE. o / yi • ^- ��■i716N W� � 59 - 054 SJR 59054[C2.GNG 5 �A - -MM _ � Q 155.7 ADJUST VALVE BOX Q ADJUST TOP OF EX. SAN. S. MH NEW TOP - 872.5 5 1 ST. S. CB TOP - 872.8 INV. = 863.75 6 ST. 5. CB TOP - 866.0 INV. - 863.0 F-- 27' DIAMETER N TOP = 868.5 INV. = 862.7 V ■I�Ni� I� 1C3r if I 'J .7.���_iiOC 1��J�I�9 7t;il :►_'•, ILJ i■ �=VAmm6iAt�_al�� T - 878 \ ate' �.T.rft�►r.�� p. TOP - 663.55 INV. 658.52 -vE 4h i E!0.7 �gt'srFS,7alp II -' T - 876 Awl 8 87 6 I, cW1 �� j�Md �•ii6�r®�N6oWP� '/.. I. �•���o� ,1r• --_ ',• .� .111111 I ® Imo• _ ,. �.� t to 3y ��Fy�►'s''^1 C�!1� ea , FRIgm - l'Yw'P �T�JCJ:Lr' ®® _tea �� rl 59 - 054 SJR 59054[C2.GNG 5 �A - -MM _ � Q 155.7 ADJUST VALVE BOX Q ADJUST TOP OF EX. SAN. S. MH NEW TOP - 872.5 5 1 ST. S. CB TOP - 872.8 INV. = 863.75 6 ST. 5. CB TOP - 866.0 INV. - 863.0 F-- 27' DIAMETER N TOP = 868.5 INV. = 862.7 V T - 879 B - 876.5/ T - 878 \ 8 ST. S. CB TOP - 663.55 INV. 658.52 -vE 4h i E!0.7 II -' T - 876 8 87 377.7 9 1 ST. S. CB TOP - 860.19 INV. - 854.24 101 ST. S. CO TOP a 855.0 INV. 850.05 -ZT - _ 867. 5 B ee. I /l a CAR. (e ee.) I" In f T -• 8611 N' 059.`23 AREA OF TEMP. FLOODING 100 YR. PEAK ELEVATION HIGH WATER - 853.14 5 I L • °f 9 11 ST. S. CB ° TOP - 854.0 INV. a 849.75 9 12 ST. S. ce •E2• 135r TOP a 854.0 INV. - 850.0 G E N E R A L N O 1 E S: t. E�nq aa4mdo7• lecelna, IappOpphk. aM utY:ry YdwrMtYl. en w. aura 4 I.a- ° w•X.r " fa.�a Ina" I.. geaa, u._ petty )/6/97. 2. The anliae of t &Gap vean dry aCpreeimaa e.". Other ItiGO m" ee;a lush now M bean photon. C..Wct GOPHER STATE ONE CALL at 454 -0002 ik, the mare waa. w 1- BOD-252-1166 W1 Ime Ito coact I.col;Pt a feqa 48 .om7rg a , Man a- aeq;nninp ." c-cl- !. oI aaopeed apol f 1aM mac. era to button .0 - Nsw a (homes Amlee. 4. Pill 0 way eam it a®manee with tM city .1 Enna fpaC9kal;are. 5. Cco p ` "c'" ;n m ,nary 'Hunt on to 25X sWeeam Praaa, maemrant pry orrery (ASTM 0698 -78 a Al T -99) from lM ape tam, to aW. 3 feel Of be 9-m aplsa am 100% Slamam Prpelw minimum pry dMery ;n tM r-. 3 feel P_,ea daM;ry Wol In bal and Ile. Plum bemath feoGrge, than, a" poeumt a Al tea one paelan teal a naimo Ito eery 100 feel of Iml at wrl'ea ;nUrvaN Col «c«arq top IwL 6. N'tly tiro E.9ime, a a" a;scmpehchm S T O R M S E IN E R N O T E S 1. Umaw Plhanow Yravtee, W; 4 IL lama« f.d.) «a -tea mi.amed eoeenb amalmma an an Gann ea.« vlaeoarta. 2. Uee a Nemah R -1733 Inure with Type 'C' noel grate. w ago and equal. - all arty dm;nF Uw nah Nee R- 3087 -DR/DL cal all nfa bee• w o opma'd equal. al as tell mane at c1m amliona 3. Tu the ted Imes m ,Oom of a. dayl41lad RCP pain ea.v a,th a m IN of two vna" w bolt 1 "larva Par jam. Thu rmu✓tenPrlt III b pan .parwm el dwroVaom tole mad a.dlaa a lmM 9pemf 12 (brad ml lime. or ewer Ito m Pe eon lag, eta. 12' ;. dem.l«. 4. Rain?— caaroa ape PM Iftl;np. than apelam to LM requirmno If of lM Sla oom Sped! Gar. fm R,;,Wto Canaan Sewer Pipe• ASTM Dw;9MGan CIS Design C afth rcWW fanfacYg 10- the clew a ape amcired. Umaw e,I - apepiraC remand vnaMe fen« ate are al eeaian all haw a type R -4 cwr ed -p. 9. . lam ;apt 06 5T. 6mma a w Mn MNDOT Slanted Plat Ina. 30061. The pvmo a e n 6- A -o lan. Cease awe W a joeaee Men P. Clime 5 ';.a wan Jacking NI E R O S I O N C 0 N T 9 0 L N 0 T E 5 1. IMIe1I aft lame It the aaauna elan on IM Pan tour to bealmrirrp cwaNCWl boa. eX fence bib a pat eppeirg or . Mt a lees bYa ewb It "A 2 I.al blo ll gmun4 AneMr the m21 fame III b a treble (a Map 6 nee deep all 6 Yale .le) d v tM upabpe pia of bM -Part Peal L" Ilra WWa In the heron al - tocu;u am '-peal. Mete al ap61n b the IIWla o P lens pal N .plan. am" the labs a Yml 9 Im had. fold N - Pod a ." Wool R W 1M cape p- SN I- m,paWig peep Mee be 2 Yoh equv. a al 'domed. al w mandate 1- or U -sal aal wool T- w U- wcl'at .lwl peeta alneR -ai4h net Im elan 1.0 N per IiMa Ipel. .pelf path Ilan a mun;mum krg0a a 30 ilhacs bum Ill each. Cou le Will Mal met the na�Yemenb a al Slal Sp 6kclf It 3733 Type 3, Md b a -Un- mR Iurnim b erper to wed fplkei `„ -=- - I ELEV. - 853.2 1 1131 ST. S. CB 14 ST. S. CB TOP - 851.4 TOP - 851.4 846.75 INV. 846.65 CONSTRUCT NEW ST. S. 1 ST. S. MH _ MH ON EXISTING 36- STORM SEWER TOP - 648.6 INV. - 640.e4 2. A.- al bmoaary "h" a1Mu.al all ai'adaaraaabla .rpeu. aft MC16e cape Oniee al ml� 1M eb tin Wvpaa foal aaaetal'al 3. ealwa Weeyanr�rq camlr.Phal ;moth a TEapOA • no" CONSiRIlCiWN ENTIIAMTX a e«A pant w.mw "o' "I W fIMINCI;en el. ow 1 b i era dlamav acY parch m all G -1 a MNOOT G -7 aarat apprcpab. Pen IM e9plyal. a a Iayer a kafl 9 ;ranee IN.. -- IM ant;n all a tM e, o Eutaw to rack cnwnn at kroa so feel ;M. IM ;P. cane Uwe a antaali4 I�Mic beneath the op9n9al. a a,dn b pr 1 mipra�en PI im. IM racy Irani al 4. betas a BLOCK AND ROUT SEOIMEMT FILTER a as nlPhbaen ukb ohich revive .pall Iran ea mod wept 131 and RaaY bat I len carob a wen-c.n ctovae mna.y blacke, am avaen (0.5' tool ). as awaee rock. Place Coon -vrc peweem naseay blatb of .i. as the-. Wool amine IM ntahbull Wa. Pfau ale evml to IM PerYMI« to the Ito a the black banie al IM mca ;f plem. Th. odeern oaf to oeemat tM mm Nom It" Mtl m,agh IM atoaee. Plan real apaeet W ere m IP tM loo of the al Uw 1 to 3 ;nap d'amaa, ck of if as MNOOT G -1, G -2, or G -3 Coame Appreqato. I-.WR tea mace at 8' all b adm to farm P bam'« Wight al 15'. 5. R- .5 le and vol tmma w ethenue dapeel.d la PawrMnl area Rerrowl .rraX a an Wiry MN thm"me t IM d=tlo, al a ayethelen, eClfa. pal road.". by e.." to .pacer¢ Smut aI" i. emcee e•0' ae« a dAam hpe bee..,rated by atmebnp a R•eeal 5. Plan a IS- Ihkk Pryer at "DOT Stomare Soemliet;uh 3601.2A Clan N 1;p -W a 7.3' Inky aye. of all SWI So" -tk. 3601.2.8 pmn,W I;Rm nabrid It ItHaleM livbd T IM plan ;. aecwaaa wl MNDOT Starlad Spectl; ion 2511. Cwl-rie Meer met." m" M ufee I. Eat .1 pmeular IA. mataea, mate rr«ap pe elta l an KNOW Stanmre Plan No. 31338 teat City at Eayan Stal P. Na. 260 Ito IM eta .1 app W.- -tee. la Pipe ate al tM. 12' dale«. IM r imam . lho'q m rilamp owe III bkmeel ✓w1 to l m ben Imt Wall for 12' demo« a- 7. Ptolwm all 111 -1M a Ilm ;n a-moaw with tiro mahade pellilC ih the Ilwl managrnvn axcpe. lmbwk VrolMinp Nab, Dupfily M burn mace: Nb.ehae by Iha V;nnnalp PcA.t n Contra e. Clan Cat al W.Vawry - 0-Htala. Poo to pe aped oe Put-1 apt« aualiry rMnepemma twin after the Mlle aa)ea ham a.aa•rg- rte tlwXta;art. 9. Urll l al Pr I. , eeeelapee 8th prppee rat ®yry 3:1 (3 hNaaeal b 1 wrtY.ta). STORMNATEA YANAGOIENT AREA Taa TNWtary OmI Amo . 7.09 acres - 0.01108 m2 Goal Stem - SCS, 24 -h1, Type e: 140 -NR Wo Kate Lava .L14 - O5 I W -Na live Storwpe VamM Inrtee - 0.2137 -1 100 -TR Iron Pu.keg - 23.40 eb 100 -YR Pm- D.waamml 6Khape - 24.05 as N OI,.P rap ltrrtm � � I 'i r.r"aan n mama. tiiO I i eONAm union SCALE 0 0 �w ` I _ 1111 L.. _J�ii/ aw " Saw ➢II OFF -SITE PONDING DETAIL DATE : V51D. CHRIST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH /70/97 1 OR'l 7/1!/97 4 all POND oEYS -319 EDINA, MINNESOTA 7 29 97 OWES. "C" /4/98 STORMNAtG MOs ;. 4TT PIAV _ •I -200 peat Oa S, c..... pecan S.a. 230 Beqm -9th,. �,a.ala 40.12 GRADING AND C2 UTILITY PLAN PLAN 2 2 OF 4 TOP 872.0 INV. - 867,76 19 ST. S. CB TOP a 871.0 INV. 867.0 O 12- 0.6 R,17[ C.P, ST. S. 1201 ST. S. MH TOP . 875.0 I.. = 866.87 • ^F es! �r 1 ST. S. MH TOP - 873.0 v.�s INV. - 863.4 INV, - 865.88n CONSTRUCT NEW MH rvv. e6s3 o ON EXIST. 1$ _ ST. S. v. -63.1 E 2 ST. S. CEI Q _3 2 -F 555 869.5 INV. 865.96 ADJUST TOP OF O EX. SAN. S. MH NEW TOP - 871.0 TEMPORARY ROCK ENTRANCE 3 ST. S. CS TOP .869.25 INV. a 865.48 4 1 ST, S. CB / TOP - 869.25 INV. - 864.99 TGP 17 ST. S. CB B . 5763 ° TOP - 861.5 IRE B - e74.s ) MV. - 855.81 ,9 INV. - 858.52 2 S-DN• 4c� :PwC II 12- P.V.C. ST. S. O 0.576 T . 075 INV. = 845.65 0 - 573) AREA OF TEMP. FLOODINE 313.7 O 1 ST. S. CB os t5 ST, S, MN TOP - 859.0 z 4 -a INV. - 856.0 u,- - - 849,75 efix3 iI ADJUST TOP OF EXIST. SAN. S. MH TOP .854.0 NEW TOP :252.5 INV. - 850.0 T - 5 a . e62 se T - 1152.5 ) 5 - 6412 12- P.V.C. ST. S. NO 1.472 16 ST. S. CB TOP - 845.5 INV. - ea2.32 F 15- V P,.C. ST, S. O 1.471 CONNECT TO EXISTING ST. S. CATCH BASIN INV. . 841.0 40 0 40 SCALE e,9 - 054 S:R 59Q54;03.DVvC I e,1 V 96 v Tcew.2 -r> 7 "aCP ( -C6 iClfil.3 tl•H39Ci tT4sraH I/® I tC -.113 c ice•7.3 MR-Wn@ •1i..w. ad SILT FENCE 1156.7 •--}Tg 7 7 \\ ZUST Q \\ ADJUST TOP OF I \ EX. SAN. S. NEW TOP . 87 871.4 5 ST. S. CB TOP 672.6 \ INV. 863.74 6 S7, S. CB Q TOP - 866.0 'I - 867.0 I--- 27- DZETER TOP - 868.5 INV. - 862.7 7 7 - 1179 B . 5763 1131 ST. S. CB r . 070 IRE B - e74.s ) I ,9 INV. - 858.52 2 S-DN• 4c� :PwC II eB0.2 T . 075 INV. = 845.65 0 - 573) AREA OF TEMP. FLOODINE 313.7 100 YR. PEAK ELEVATION HIGH WATER a 853.14 96.E:X < t5 ST, S, MN a fifi.p 1 11 ST, S. CB 4 -a TOP - 854.0 u,- - - 849,75 efix3 iI TOP - 848.6 INV. 840.84 fi2.+ I TOP .854.0 I I INV. - 850.0 STORY EXISTING EIUILDING ME M4.23 ME 873.59 6 n,I X CFE 862 71 I ME 01I ►eT L 11I � - OV �� _i :1.1•l14 � � C� •1i..w. ad SILT FENCE 1156.7 •--}Tg 7 7 \\ ZUST Q \\ ADJUST TOP OF I \ EX. SAN. S. NEW TOP . 87 871.4 5 ST. S. CB TOP 672.6 \ INV. 863.74 6 S7, S. CB Q TOP - 866.0 'I - 867.0 I--- 27- DZETER TOP - 868.5 INV. - 862.7 7 7 - 1179 B . 5763 1131 ST. S. CB r . 070 U B - e74.s ) I ,9 INV. - 858.52 2 S-DN• 4c� :PwC II eB0.2 T . 075 INV. = 845.65 0 - 573) AREA OF TEMP. FLOODINE 313.7 100 YR. PEAK ELEVATION HIGH WATER a 853.14 96.E:X < t5 ST, S, MN a fifi.p 1 11 ST, S. CB 4 -a TOP - 854.0 u,- - - 849,75 efix3 iI TOP - 848.6 INV. 840.84 fi2.+ I TOP .854.0 I I INV. - 850.0 •1i..w. ad SILT FENCE 1156.7 •--}Tg 7 7 \\ ZUST Q \\ ADJUST TOP OF I \ EX. SAN. S. NEW TOP . 87 871.4 5 ST. S. CB TOP 672.6 \ INV. 863.74 6 S7, S. CB Q TOP - 866.0 'I - 867.0 I--- 27- DZETER TOP - 868.5 INV. - 862.7 7 7 - 1179 B . 5763 1131 ST. S. CB r . 070 B Si. S. CB B - e74.s ) TOP - 863.55 ,9 INV. - 858.52 2 S-DN• 4c� :PwC NAB eB0.2 T . 075 INV. = 845.65 0 - 573) AREA OF TEMP. FLOODINE 313.7 100 YR. PEAK ELEVATION 9 1 ST.. S. CEI TOP 860.19 INV. 854.24 10 ST. S. CB TOP 855.0 T.. - 850.05 T - 867 p 5 . 6643) 1131 ST. S. CB i - 887 1141 ST. S. CB blO� 9 - 6th) GAR. ME75725 "C -17.7 - 6841 7 (IT B - B61 / INV. = 845.65 IN 59.23 AREA OF TEMP. FLOODINE v 100 YR. PEAK ELEVATION HIGH WATER a 853.14 96.E:X < t5 ST, S, MN a fifi.p 1 11 ST, S. CB 4 -a TOP - 854.0 u,- - - 849,75 efix3 iI TOP - 848.6 INV. 840.84 fi2.+ I TOP .854.0 I I INV. - 850.0 G E N E R A L N 0 7 E S: 1. E-ninp- Gary, Y „-. maapwehie, am Wit, :nfwrna- inia olio Iron a _h,., A Nanorn Sinew tnc, aatw 7/5/97. 2. The leealian at uUr.tiee Moen ape .-I-. piny. 01 .'awas a, : at .;ch how 01 been Math. Celaaet GOPHER STATE ONE CALL et 454 -0002 in IM rpetn a 1-500-252 -1165 too fee. for .eeal lacati al at leeel b w ~iin9 day noun Mftw Mgim+inp my cone- . M 3. Aa orepw -pot a- Loan ape b mtt,n+ I cure .1b ahewu. indicated. 4. Pwfa an 011 11 waY .n aevwnM nth the City of EdIm .p.eirNmim. 5. Can+met backfA in alI Mary tmoMt to 95X Standen Peed"' rnoilnem dry den.iy (ASTY D698 -78 a AA9R0 T -99) /rem t% pipe dem to ailhih 3 feet at O+e groNnd awface and I= Stoneaw Prociar ma-im.m -dry behity in tM final 3 feet. Prawee dmiy team in wcwdm am two pM beneath fe -Itp, Loy as pa-a . N Mad aW ampeelien teat is nm.; w Iw eee,y 100 fort M lrLwr at -erucal brlahme net eeWe . loo feet. 6. Haley tM En9;- of dry di.crei -I a S T O R Y S E R E R N O T E S: I. U-Now Mhe,aiee Imitated. tar 4 It. dMhlale, (ld.) pee -peel r.'adarc-d caa:r.m Lwelarw men Lars eeeer camhboeee. 2. UM a Ne R -1733 bard with TyW L•• rWO1 9wte, w aoawed aural, en M win droi- Uw Ne R- 3057 -OR/DL catabIg with pan teat w -h ed woL. M be catch bei. at eon ke.00- 3. 11 the Yrt ,be, .slim. Mad doyd9lNm RID Laren .wee 71h wauiiem.n a tee Comm W "I /aLaww pa joint. 1t ppliw to both aPetrmm an dewnLwam PM Wale am puree. Retain bum Thane m /area old eectae w Woo tar 0 PPM, Mrge, men 12' In diameter. 4. R.iMOnee eaaem ; ape f101gt Mao -0- le the rca-hahm M the Slanle,d Somlrea _ 1e, Renlwcad Cenvem Seta Rae. ASTM Deegnalcn CIO Onipn C with .-Aft, "'Tif -beg 1e, lM ape. M lip. -wad. Un1ew ath.rwiee ep.cJra4 r.inlawd twnenm eeeer piae and eve watial..hM haw a ryae R -4 ce,lfmee wake, V -6N 9wMet Wnt caWiwetee In acaaddrlw aim ASRI 0361 -65T. ..N d'une,+eew a pPrOhheat" w -neon W nd WOOT Staen Plpt- No. 3005f The 9owN -hall M ci W w - voc0on. Cmvate OW m b be ocd brall M d w e 5 Thick Wall JMUrg Rae. E R 0 5 1 0 N C 0 N T R O L N O T E S: 1. 'hem'! bit Ie.. 0 the Meatus .awn m the Pa. Prior To ."Imieq caen -tion. - mil lens wit. a pet. epea5np M 4 meet w l Orin pat- ITT - 2 Not We IM icicle aew aneLW 6 9 eon .a in o� w-bw ea a ae tea m coLb Lee Make /oak r IM ,/then ari Ian baewitl Ono eAT "' . Yob ary ear r M the toga M a lellpe pail. N ear y 1 r 1 IM Imri at 14ae1 a ircM. I II ever, and eeTaey /aelth n le the I.aw oW S91 leq eWpa- abet, .MO T 7 inM mtaI Pr M-pa Mr..cad, pith. w peal. Te ll a U -.Mon -heel pasta T- w U -fact oem waive ahe aph not re, than 1.0 i" per at" pbee laal. Ppe,w Lou law f minbnwrr r'glh M .10 SncMt peer Mpial Wan. O Sto Iabc Loa ti- 73 rapirwrrrin M YNDOT SIaM th Speeil1. d Mi Type 3, rarl+t,Ma in a eerrMoas fee M ores le .-aid J I Ida "6 cl ICI \•1 \) � �/ 1I ^ sal JR 2. Rome -e all I-nlparay "hectic, -trKlwaL ob na+pgdgnWple ew.im ape twoonent ear+tral eve- ally 'he i. Me aMapa- real Lapii-utlow, x Below M0.ppiMn+��'p eoMrMele . w ba TEMPORAIN ROOK CONSfBIlC710N ENTBANU 1 aaen 'nt .need nielw 't IM bahat -ien Site. Uw + to 2 i-en diameter wcb -N ee MN007 G -1 w WHOM G -2 cperee aggregate. Pbee ,h. INT' epem in a laver at MW1 6 +.nee thick __ lM 8MIN, akth of lM ",,= E,mm Iha w4 thhoma al SO I., inia IM eanlbalim !mL uw a 9eeleL5M leaf admen lM agghtgel. in Gorr to Phi- d .6gir.6- al .01 into IM racy Iran bead, 4. Ihwtee a BLOCK AND ROOK SEDIMENT I'VER M 0e, Mtchb..n irdalw .Mich fee . roll I- ai-Wpe. area: ®xY arm Racy I'M : ,,- w .1 ep.n_ as . nlmany bbeY; n (T5' - ;ng.), reel : aW aWl+ -ewe ncral. ry Mace It, Neiw m Roth eor doer IM a hen table In1.1. P1ae..+e eDaiw The h lM okmad.e, h the lea ci IM b1eeY penor tNfw. I,r koh iw pt,ca4 r eewth aem to a.-.nt IM pew Iran Mira . t the to IM the b Rpce i to 3 i h air. met.- le u+. tea M 1M IMOaCA UM + - 3 ach diam.te, """ eu" W YNDOT G -1, G -2. a G -3 Ccaror A9gre9pt.. N+.lee Im Ill!""" of e' bbeb Ip law O berTMr MipNl a ,6•. 5. Rnron as le am wdihwnle traCMb a otherwise depaelm ante p.wmeel w Rempor' eNau M m a .airy Mee to -,,-1 the dur:1 -1 el IM cm 1lrelim. Clean Oo-ee read -r,e by sh -piling a wwpnp. °1 st- avehrq M alle-ea ere, area - dbne,ll hpe been mm-ee a ish -ling w w -eepina 6. PYe a 15• thick layer M MNDOT S1aMm. Saeulical'rn 361 Clew Y 6pr.p sae a 73• thick M,e/ W YNOOT st°rbae sp.ciricatun 3601.2.8 prmua fine, mot -rid 0 Mcalgq i wcaW m lM pMN 01 wca'aance with YNDOT Standen Specif tar 2511. Geomev. -ter material -, be .eee o i.. 1 anular line, -I". 1 lee n-P ale M ean m YNDOT Stamare Rot, No. 31338 at, City of E,W Standee Peal- No. 260 Iw the -4, of pipe iMicalee, re, piae ,be a -IN, The. , n 12• ar-1 1M muN quamlly .1 hprep o0 nit-r b-iml mall M no Mao lhth Ihat rNeirM la 12' gamete, epee. 7. Pedarrll au ape 0-901 Pwelixe :n waaWwe with the rn-1110at auWhad in the Met naraga -I aacicw MMbMc 7wtectinp wad Ouatty n It- Nwe: Nowhoo by the rwmto Pou.U., Cemrel Ag-,y. S CMee out all lempaery wdimenle Mein to M +see W M,r ,,hwH -otw alairy Imrlapnrlthl Mein WIT, the Mliw pn7eel Nee _Q_ f I -loeiil000n. 9. Cape n,,ct .B proposed tonbpe- .iu+ 9raaee hot - onew.g 3e, (3 bori -m. To I -.a4a). STOM TER MANAGEMENT AREA Taal Tribumry Omhe" Nee - 7.09 acre - 0.01108 2 O kw Stern - SCS, 24-b, Tyae e: 100 -YR Wlih WMa Rawl - 553.14 I DO -yR live 51 r," Alms Ul"dilee - 0.2137 acs -1t. 100 -YR Pon- De-aw-t Oiecharp from Po rwp - 23.40 co 100 -vR Pr.- 0...lemrm OTicnwee . 24.D5 ale ltLMra -e,0 ceelme LE c t' 100' O 3 �� # g u i L L OFF -SITE PONDING DETAIL 1131 ST. S. CB 1 1141 ST. S. CB TOP - 851.4 TOP = 851.4 INV. = 845.65 wIE - - CONSTRUCT NEW ST. S. t5 ST, S, MN ' MN ON EXISTING 36' u,- - - STORY SEWER TOP - 848.6 INV. 840.84 2. Rome -e all I-nlparay "hectic, -trKlwaL ob na+pgdgnWple ew.im ape twoonent ear+tral eve- ally 'he i. Me aMapa- real Lapii-utlow, x Below M0.ppiMn+��'p eoMrMele . w ba TEMPORAIN ROOK CONSfBIlC710N ENTBANU 1 aaen 'nt .need nielw 't IM bahat -ien Site. Uw + to 2 i-en diameter wcb -N ee MN007 G -1 w WHOM G -2 cperee aggregate. Pbee ,h. INT' epem in a laver at MW1 6 +.nee thick __ lM 8MIN, akth of lM ",,= E,mm Iha w4 thhoma al SO I., inia IM eanlbalim !mL uw a 9eeleL5M leaf admen lM agghtgel. in Gorr to Phi- d .6gir.6- al .01 into IM racy Iran bead, 4. Ihwtee a BLOCK AND ROOK SEDIMENT I'VER M 0e, Mtchb..n irdalw .Mich fee . roll I- ai-Wpe. area: ®xY arm Racy I'M : ,,- w .1 ep.n_ as . nlmany bbeY; n (T5' - ;ng.), reel : aW aWl+ -ewe ncral. ry Mace It, Neiw m Roth eor doer IM a hen table In1.1. P1ae..+e eDaiw The h lM okmad.e, h the lea ci IM b1eeY penor tNfw. I,r koh iw pt,ca4 r eewth aem to a.-.nt IM pew Iran Mira . t the to IM the b Rpce i to 3 i h air. met.- le u+. tea M 1M IMOaCA UM + - 3 ach diam.te, """ eu" W YNDOT G -1, G -2. a G -3 Ccaror A9gre9pt.. N+.lee Im Ill!""" of e' bbeb Ip law O berTMr MipNl a ,6•. 5. Rnron as le am wdihwnle traCMb a otherwise depaelm ante p.wmeel w Rempor' eNau M m a .airy Mee to -,,-1 the dur:1 -1 el IM cm 1lrelim. Clean Oo-ee read -r,e by sh -piling a wwpnp. °1 st- avehrq M alle-ea ere, area - dbne,ll hpe been mm-ee a ish -ling w w -eepina 6. PYe a 15• thick layer M MNDOT S1aMm. Saeulical'rn 361 Clew Y 6pr.p sae a 73• thick M,e/ W YNOOT st°rbae sp.ciricatun 3601.2.8 prmua fine, mot -rid 0 Mcalgq i wcaW m lM pMN 01 wca'aance with YNDOT Standen Specif tar 2511. Geomev. -ter material -, be .eee o i.. 1 anular line, -I". 1 lee n-P ale M ean m YNDOT Stamare Rot, No. 31338 at, City of E,W Standee Peal- No. 260 Iw the -4, of pipe iMicalee, re, piae ,be a -IN, The. , n 12• ar-1 1M muN quamlly .1 hprep o0 nit-r b-iml mall M no Mao lhth Ihat rNeirM la 12' gamete, epee. 7. Pedarrll au ape 0-901 Pwelixe :n waaWwe with the rn-1110at auWhad in the Met naraga -I aacicw MMbMc 7wtectinp wad Ouatty n It- Nwe: Nowhoo by the rwmto Pou.U., Cemrel Ag-,y. S CMee out all lempaery wdimenle Mein to M +see W M,r ,,hwH -otw alairy Imrlapnrlthl Mein WIT, the Mliw pn7eel Nee _Q_ f I -loeiil000n. 9. Cape n,,ct .B proposed tonbpe- .iu+ 9raaee hot - onew.g 3e, (3 bori -m. To I -.a4a). STOM TER MANAGEMENT AREA Taal Tribumry Omhe" Nee - 7.09 acre - 0.01108 2 O kw Stern - SCS, 24-b, Tyae e: 100 -YR Wlih WMa Rawl - 553.14 I DO -yR live 51 r," Alms Ul"dilee - 0.2137 acs -1t. 100 -YR Pon- De-aw-t Oiecharp from Po rwp - 23.40 co 100 -vR Pr.- 0...lemrm OTicnwee . 24.D5 ale ltLMra -e,0 ceelme LE c t' 100' O 3 �� # g u i L L OFF -SITE PONDING DETAIL I_° 40 0 40 60 _ _.__ SCALE .1 HT 89 - 054 S:R 59C54E04.0WC 0 E N E R A L N 0 7 E S 1. E.W.9 bwmary. Beal . kopap apwc, am v"ty inlamolen wwa a o plw a Wmmy by Nora Too, PWfAn Olin. Ina. aW0 77/!/97. 2. The bcauan. of In:Wiw mnoan am app momma day. Dlba .611- mw nip ao,icb Ivm NI Coon Wham. cab t GOPHER STATE ONE CALL at 454 -=2 M tft NIm arm. a 1- 800 -ISI -1169 b" fma fa eooet IocalioN at MaW 48 elmip day Nwm edam bpainl N arty ramgu tk . 3. M Pmpa•N set OaWeN abw am b Norton at cyro yNS atlsaem imicalma. 4. Pofam W 1"ty ooY In aecamdamta aitn IN Ot1 of ESN opwrtWipna. 5. Compact baddA in W atSt7 t mN. b 951E.Sbmam Pm Mto, mlpdmya M "Not, Writ oGoo -76 P M41To T -99) how IN Pip* dam to aiNM 3 fool W IN praum wpface IN ID= Stanamm Proctor avti a1 dwotl M IN rapt 3 /M Pfd itm as iq t- M OwYrdb am 61m Plmcat bamaN Iaelhlp., ropy, BLIP PomnmaltA N MOW ere cPpeetlel lM i. -.kw fa wmrl 100 fW If Irma W awlicd Mtnmah nW ta000inp too Tool. 8. NWify tna Enpim, of a" d;mwo eiu, S T O R M S E To E R N O T E S 1. Unlma DINaots blS.ted, us 4 (L SarNi to.d.) pm- rwWo,ad toval. Wnxt- w W atom rasa .tMyimm. 2. Uw a Noorpn R -1733 bore with Typo Y radial Bab, o aPwpwd moues. an W amo dmir Uoo Noorpo, R- 3067 -OR/OL coWNlp *0o, carp yes, or appromd sPIM. on W wtM yam at aura lacalim 3. r 1M YmW lllrw motion W IN day6pMad RCP atom waa 's a mlMmurml W lam eampw U" apt 1-timm pa joint nw Two mauirolt appli.. to baK, upst- am aamnatraam ,"Pa Men am a M1nIW "" p 9 w "a"" a0 al Cf- P . . fa W pips WW IN. 12' M dianeta. I. Rord-d c -creta pw and r.tU pm Mao cedar, s IN maIIHo MS d am ""Nom Spoolf lion la Raildaroa Cmnemb Saar Pipe. ASTY DsipmGM C78 Dmipn C .i1N CWC AW IdnfueYq Ia IN 1,.s a qoo sacred. UMas 0UWmis "ooe10tlL 1 -faced palrerolm woo Poo ere and =140== R-4 eanrNed nmaav b• -Poq h dI occer.w ZN W 0361 -6m aiat mpma3 ap T,a g Iaot s Oto w NKD Sbreom Pb1a Ns. SDaeP. IN pwata Mae y omaa M mPS -m., ji Cannata py b y iacba iwl y mow 5 TA;W Oa0 bddrq Roo. E R O S I O N C O N T R O L N O T E S 1. Vs1pY WI farq W tN bw;.m Oloon w IN gam wW b yp^"k9 eaepwtar. MOW oN faun dlo, a rs IA7w.q d 4 foot . Iaoo. Drim pads W a- 2 IM Mb IN 9-1. Am IN .dl f- bete M o peep (W Moat 8 eels dos amd 6 bmeNS aiM) d. w IN mWwm "iam d IN mY.al pOOa. Loo IN lank fn IN I am lbn betlCi am! cone YIN ere Ogres M tN IoMb W a forty P=L N aPl omrby 1N lobe al bst 6 irons. laid N IN , am *roam,,'. R b IN snoo Pool. Silt falea wpporb" Pe"s INK y 2 Imp so- a brpa brtaaet, pbm, o msmad T- a U- omclul Wool amid. T- r U- **Ilia, VM Pws OWN wo N1 hod then 1A to per rylwl foot. Poos aNW bm a miimuw Wmpin d 30 ImNI PAtl b." d"Wb. Goatodta Iyab INK ash IN m a"I'M ss W YNOOT Standad Spmcir -t;.n 3733 Try" 3. f_b0ato M a IKIIt atl moo, M Oda to *mob dales. 2. Rmnem tll tar M Wt- . W IIII.IL am nsebepre.eb a W- ant NW_ - awls aaa tN os Ns maeapare raW atinal.61- 1 Idafera ewatmWi tl 0 a TEIPOPART IMM GONSTRIICaa TIDrI"[MRUNCE at .oCl terra aro .anim wR IN me ;W. m I le 2 is fm alto, s MNDOT G -1 w YNOOT G -2 Wow'90"N A Pbs um. epBapol. M a I.,. a kaft 9 irldem "i" - IN *maim aiab W tm ellmm CWO IN rock Mlmay W Baal 50 Iwt ins IN "*`ruction tom. Uoo a pstoul" Iabrie Wmato, to,. p09rrod. in aroa b Pamnt mgmtbr of aail ins tN r f- aeba. 4. MWW a BLOC[ AND ROOK SEDIMENT FILTER W W miatalbOetml ;Meta afitJm rooie" .1w Iron "Ib sod amea 81eeY IN Rack, MN rdtam etlmiW W Open -oaa ca mIe mmmnry atoebl aim **Oran (0.5• apani,). am aaaflW rack. Pbw den -Kam -1. Im-.y bmaeb Wn NN, M III& aids ar.wW IM mplMOSM Mbt. PMS atm oo- c-N IN Pot w a to KM IN, Of IN blyA 1xv Wr yfaa IN, Feick U Oo TN ac oot. to PmmM III* rmb fmma yip ""No 1Maupn IN oktY". Playa _ olio"' IN aim mre01 b 1N" tap at the bio 4 the I to 3 NIaI Werrmata rock Wen as YfmOi G -1, G -2. a G -3 Cea o Aygryeta, bmlW loo mt!r at S• bW9. M aroa b few o bmrmla NaipM .1 16•. 5. R- WI rob Ono sd'arslta traeYW a alfltreao 0apoots who IMNII -1 acs. T'= , m„ y w a WiN W" tnraa9NU1 IN Wrolien c ma-ten. Clow lams raaaaal. by M" p or aoaapinp. ShM a Nine b euwN .14 oft. av:P mn t N. oven rmlwed A aNm4np or marwpirlp. IL Pb. a IV twi kw d YNDOT Slamiao Spodrsel'ar 3601.2A Cbw R riprap Oda a 73• INeY low of MNDoT Stoma i Spsilk.U. 3601.2.8 Bmamr Wla -AW W I*MiGM Moiaaao w IN Pen M ardm.mtm ails MOOT Slamad SwT. t'Nw 2511. C:t- filer -wicti woo to .sad km Gay of Bmwam lilt. mOSritl, bmlall rlpmp w *ban S, YNDOT Slamad Pala Mo. 31338 m Gty of Eagan Slamara Pbla No. 700 fa ...;p. i7 YIS.Y6 ra goo - _Aar Ile, 17• diwela, IN a mpla61Y W ripmo am nW pmnw ipp M re im INn that -.kW IP 12• fwN1a pips. 7. Pafam IN Omar cenhai ~kin ac aalq ;lo, Ism tbaa Wtinad M tN st mllarlaparlrMt proelies Ygmb.b ?ralmetimlp ■" OuW111 M ayn ArsR putl'aNd t4 IN YinNSla P."Ute, COMrtl Apamy. 8. Cbw aW W Umpaary wo-ocrU n bWis to N Iced w par-INm wta auau'ty rnarlapa 1 sM after IN, slim prajsl No -d.9 a rimpt nabl- 9. Co a-ct W p. Y oAembaam a1n 9- NK o 3:1 (3 bailanlol b 1 mart;.,). STORM TER MANAGEMENT AREA Total TrIMIbry OmiNpa Aura . 7.09 avw - OAT 108 7 n ', Stool - SCS. N -M. Typo a: 100 -1R 16po, RWa IOW - a53.14 100 -YR Umm SWOgd Ytlom Nilised - 0.2137 den -fL 100 -1R POW- Om.doanant 0't ..alga I- Pa=q - 23.°0 d. IGO-TR era- oaWaalwd DIwNrpa - 24.05 des N Iy r0a-JT SIE 0 I• loo' d 0 7- i � I\I \v /ice •a' a I J 1 Qa• OFF -SITE PONDING DETAIL )_ w W N Uc } 0 Ln Ln 3 \/ aIE SIGNAGE g2021 1 21 21r. _.. NORMANDALE ROAD 0� TOT Lor mvt5E 0 V I r- I EAPP Tl M " I X17 ta e 11ci D \ , I l;l II 5 27 IRY I ; I I II C�p EL FC rC K I I i1 1 I 19 19 19 TT��f1 �I I i \ EI A 'OTA KY SPACE KIN SP SIN PRA5E � p I i I O = 20 21 21 1 f I ij 1 �1 s u L s V a � O a N 'L u t� Y 0— W Tushi N s V "Tr +,pit Montgomery Associates .Inc. : su mvd. s.o PrWw..s 3100 E6no —r way. •601 55-35 Minn.DDDIi., Minrw.OlD 612 - 5!0.6208 rAR ;830-8215 p6�W.P Yn R.DI�WYI¢ Reif lY KWCB� i.Et?tCti�t`A(um.. MBy Mcon • fur uIa 99 of am P.D ;ect No. L1.1 ' SCALE I- 40'-0 DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY 'OrM SM AZEA 40ZM SF.(93ACM5) EASrM STE AREA 29-298 SF. (66 ACKE5) MP.rkftK SITE AREA - 07766.=ACKES) BASEAKEARArID 56• SF. NL ROOK, AREA KAID DIDBASF. 331 PARROG 7 WALKS 2227215 S.F. 565 T. OPEN AREA 18.756 SF. 2931 TOrm 402.752 5. 'OOL BULOW AREA EASTNOM OM PIASE01E F.5ETWO TOr& LOW" LEME. 10050 U. 2450 SF. 051. 22300 Sr. MANLE'EL 1436051. RA50$E. 9780 SLV 56590 S.F. 2W L&U 4600 5F. 6300 ELF. !780 SF. 52060 SF. 3RDLEMEL 10,8A 5F. O5'. 9.r209F. B$%5. "OrAL BLLDEG AREA 7L24 SF. 3vm SF. 2B.6B0 S.F. DIOBL SF. "0rM PARRI G R'.IMP I PER 3 SEATS N 5ANCIAART (9551 39 SPACES •ARRGPROV6) 647 SPACES KC rARKM rROALED 13 SPACES s u L s V a � O a N 'L u t� Y 0— W Tushi N s V "Tr +,pit Montgomery Associates .Inc. : su mvd. s.o PrWw..s 3100 E6no —r way. •601 55-35 Minn.DDDIi., Minrw.OlD 612 - 5!0.6208 rAR ;830-8215 p6�W.P Yn R.DI�WYI¢ Reif lY KWCB� i.Et?tCti�t`A(um.. MBy Mcon • fur uIa 99 of am P.D ;ect No. L1.1 NORMANDALE ROAD 0 O To< O I W LOr Cr Oe� — Eo i P .. rr i� sERVCE E�� OI _ SE I r I ® I PI4A5E I A Y 1 NEW SMMARY \' - . PATIO ,t I I L — } 00 ® _vQ1f 5 cnrvDPY ^ 1 l �•. I I 5 V W 3 i I i� �r =��•15 sr_1 . EYEM 91GNAGE 20 T7- 21 21 1—T Mw Ermtr 1 1 I I 19 19 /I I EI I i 1 ARK] i /w vas 1 ! MEMO \61j JkSITE – QPTQL TWO — '_I��� 1 1, DEVELOPMENT 5UMMARY "0rM 5 E ABA 1DL752 SF. (97 AOE5) EASTNG S.TE AREA 29.79851..(6,5 POPES) ADD.TVVY SITE AREA '07766. TLS MRE5) BASE AREA RMD 56990 SF. N{ FLOOR AREA RA'10 13WM SF. 551 FARI16G I WNF.S 227216 SY. 56.5% On NAMA '1973651.. 29.5 ,arm 102.752 S.F. '.70L 8Ll1PW,AREA EASTM VLLMG MIME 0•E FHA_E TWO TOTM LNU LEYE. VDW S.F. 2.505'. OSF. 22500 SF. . Lon 51:1.05F. ¢15051. 97805'. 5699051.. 2`0 JY`1 a= 5F. 69605. 9700 SF. 32DWEF.. 3KDLEYEL 109M 51. 0S.'. R20 5F. 1994 SF. -OM BILDW. AREA 7L124 5F. 51290 S=. 28.680 SF. OLOM U. "0fM FAME R: LIRED 1 FER 3 SEATS N SAIC.INRY (9951 30 5FACE5 ^ARKM FR0/6_0 M7 SFMPS KC FAaDG "DAPED O SFAMS 21 ZI nn.- C .J a ° N L U �C y C L W N L Tushie V Montgomery A680Cioti3 Inc. Aar.o �e o..v.•.: seen ray. 5300 Eoine —.r Noy. •601 Minnwoofia. in—, 55175 612 - 830.8205 Fm; 600.6215 ouwa.Lw �a:¢L.in Lc ae¢ .e.rt, mere a v Ka®y SR6[4Lr eLYwEO. D'a n By Pr Plect Mcnilacl TY 0-. .a By TL. Cl Dote 2446 Naririena • s-am r at-1 on A la sm P,.mc1 No. U.2 Ld w Lal V, L O N N 3 00 O O I ® I ` PNIISE I WW 5MMARY PAY10 �.{ I PHASE 1 I\ I I .I 21 21 / I\ \ / — rl; - sl NORMANDALE 1-11, W1fL�CaS `I VEMOPMEW SUMMARY 'OrA SITE AREA 4027'.!2 SF .IRS ACRES) 005TN05"AREA 29.;M SF.("FMS) AOO.iQ/ALSTEAREA 7447 SF (17 ACRES) EASE" FOR RB=TEO 691N511EEr 35008 SF. (h ACRES) SASE AREA RAro 500 SF. 0% FLOOR AREA RATIO 15%084 S.F. 36% FNOVG /NALK5 6M68 SF. 55:1 ORIARFA nLFM SF. 5151 TOM 5a/985F. '00L SLLMG AREA EAST)G BLLMG MOM OW MASETMO TOTAL LAYER LEVEL MM IF $WO S.F. 051. 2ZW051. MAN LEVEL 34.560 S.F. 12450 SF. 97505.'. 56ffi SF. 210 LEVEL 6900 SF. S= SF. 9750M. 32080SF. 3KPLEVM VT. SF. 057. 120 SF. 695. S.F. 'OM MALW AREA 7LI24 SF. 3L'190 Sc. 79.Fi ou 010845F. 'OrAL FAR OG REQL4W 1 PER 5 SEATS N SAPMARY RSA SO SFACES FAmi FROeM 529 S►AMS ILC FARIOG FROA M 15 SFAMS ROAD i. I i ! i O I I � I � i I I I � I � I I I I I I — � L Zl 21 2 L,� 1 � [� I v S U L S U a � N N CL W N s U If1T�1r Tushia Monlgomary AesoClOtas Inc. 3700 Ednemouph WoV. •801 MatnfWOGS. A4nnffet0 55458 812 - 830-8208 FAR:830 -8215 iLCtYty No n`u..ia ME mFUEia�AtoMO t�ATC. ..• of a ra .cut reef wtnN min µK Ao.rtn. COin�t OIKfwGff[6 KI®• tOCI>•RKl• .LYf•E0. 0'... eY Pre'.ct Mcnitact TM Chafe By TL. OT Oo4 2.9-88 R.vifianf N "l lam Pr0'ect No. L1.3 NORMANDAL Ld v) UL } 0 N Ld 3 PLAN 0 OPTION SOSITE I' OWELOPMENf SUMMARY -OTAL SDE AIMA a022825F.(93AOMS) MSrpG51EAREA 29Ar3851.(6D AMS) ADOIIONAL WE AREA 72757 SF .(17 AO .S) EA5 -1446 FOR MMXATED 69M STREET 55409 Sr. (.8 ACIMS) SA AREA F.AM SE 545905E 51 ROOK AREA RAID MOM SF. 36 S FARI@G /WALO W665F. 53.5 L OMNAREA MAM SF. 3t5 % TOTAL 567710 5F. '001 5MDSG AREA EASTW BIeDOG MI ASE Of PHASE TWO TOTAL IOWEK LM V.050 S.F. 12.50 SY. 0SF. 27.500 SF. n1 Lgm 34760 SF. m4ws5. 918D S.F. 565905F. 21O LOU 5.9O0 SF. 6S•O S.F. 9.76051. 32DW5F. 3RDLEYEL MA S.F. 05.'. %tZD&F 19.954 SF. —AL SU.M10 AREA 7104 SF. 312105'. 26AM SF. UlOS4 SF. -OTAL FARRCG IMOLV E) -. 1 PER 3 SEATS N SANCTUARY (951 30 SPACES 'ARl7G IROVD•J 529 SPACES NC FAMOG "1095004 13 SPACES —A T, I I F I .......... I � I � I � I I I I I � L._. I I I I I I � I ; � � I I I I I I I I I s U L s V a C o a •L U 4--) 5, N v C L (- W N S V ..�„ M Tushia ANOnt9Omary Associates Inc. ve ot, AP n�•e.�.u. 3300 Eco —rough woy. •601 X_.6.. 2-1. 55-35 612 - 830.8208 FW 830 -8215 wL .ta.rzctuta wo ORAmD9 AQ< N I �Q146Y0 to asAtm =_ T Af iM .non�ip9n. Atl tmtm LA gmi6 6 RLMII�@,dR rte. vL�orcxL• agm2o. Dra n 8, Pre'ect Mcni tact TY [hacked By TL. CT Dot• 2.9.98 Rwisio�s Allow avlp M ■Rats s9 T6{ f l Pro'ect No. L1.4 a 0 00 un H w w �• Nyr ell e r Ir r* ad ®I® iI PATIO o r qI--1— � Ui E 3 �rrn i J' II ii •,IiP I I S�( 1 - - - - SERVILE niASE I NEW SMCNARY rRa ..MNXr Amr,ru � ..m c.m+e.wa _ - -. �•� IT Tor �.. �r --I Lar ♦... � J Mho �ie/ !!i / // %/// //Ni" AN APO PLAN -- OPTION ONE 1 SCALE V • AO -O' RUBBER NOSE — GUY HIRES (8 PER TREE) TREE N STEEL POSTS ITuL ENTIRE BED (A' DEEP) REMOVE BURLAP VS FROM TOP SPECIFIED SOL MIXTURE MOUND OF COMPACTED 901L TO SUPPORT TREE NOTE. 91ZE OF TREC PIT 19 BASED ON SIZE OF BALL I AI 2 NO SLLLE -�U 7 RIVER ROCK W FILTER F 4 MUCH A WS-X v+- PLASTIC EDGr IN1Yl Ellli91111111 Sw �qn FINISH GRADE) / ST COMPACTED �BfF�C I I• . SOIL MOM ROOT — M N AI 3 ND SCALE 3 �! 7. i tiw :w �; ter.+ T ►,il: �„ ii . ;►i :; II' re. Ilk DOnww6 T� e+... v m s •+r rr. re.rr VPAVING EDGE- START SOD FLASH PATH PAVING SW ACR05.9 SLOPE NOf DOW SLOPE MULCH (A' our) REMOVE BURLAP SEE EDGE OF V3 FROM TOP 1� I) `. 1) MI!L(AI DETAIL FINISH GRACE Cp14ACM BUBGRADE SOIL nORUIR STAGGER SOD SO SEAMS DO Itlfl. N'UICN LATER TO of NOT LINE UP COV3 ENTIRE BED SOO ONLY DISTURBED AREAS AREA AND VARY ENDING POINT TO PREVENT WAS.OIT5 4 DETAIL 5 AI NO SCALE NO SCALE s u L s U r d V N ,L U a C w VI .L U Tushia Monlgomary ABSOCialaS Inc. Awr.0 .w�1. Nr- ono:•. � s.e P,e.e. 3300 E6,e —gh w.y. •601 MemFaDeff. MiAReelo 75435 613 - 830 -8208 FMC 330 -8715 WITCHER llr,A,` NI -E o--TO ..• oai Iu�¢ nar ..e, Mrerrtx ToaDlr ti� � rrzcr. � lu aorta s TOP„o.r no ar,<e.ISL. AK K� 9TOifALT 4Rev[e. Dr... By P,e eci Nchit=z TM Cn'c By TL. GT Dote 3.9-96 R-W— •Asl . 0.4. 11191.63 m • am Pr.,— N.. L2.1 LU LV w CC N L 0 1- tn 3 AI3C 951 AILI SCALE I' . eO -O' RUBBER BE GUT MIRES (3 PER TREE) TREE WRAP STEEL POSTS ITULGN ENTIRE REPCVE BURLAP IA PROM TOP SPECIFIED SOIL nIXTURE MPIND OF COMPACTED SOIL TO SUPPORT TREE 'I NOTE. SIZE OF TREE PIT 1' IS BASED ON SIZE OF BALL 2 IN AI NO SCALE 2' RIVER ROCK LA FILTER F o •- MULCH BE • 5/S'% 1 /•' PLASTIC EDGI IIt YI X11NY 1111/111 FINISH GRADE) STAK / COMPACTED SIUIW C SOIL MOM ROOT BA — EDGE OF M N AI 3 ND SCALE NORMANDALE ROAD I NP5FWSEI LAFE BUFFER 111115 FHASEI LvIDSCnPE BUFFER --?NASE I FA s uAr ! 1 PAVING EDGE- START SOD FLUSH LAITY PAVING SOD ACROSS SLOPE NOT DOWN SLOPE MULCw (•- DEEP) 4E E BURLAP SEE EDGE OF A FRpT TOP �� `� % MULCH DETAIL FINISY GRADE COMPACTED BUBGRADE SOIL MIXTURE STAGGER SOD $O SEAMS 00 NOTE. CeIVER LATER TO a� NOT LINE CAP ENTIRE Bm SOD ONLY DISTURBED AR AREA. AND VART ENDING POINT TO PREVENT WASLIOUT9 N I &W2—=MAIL-NO SCALE NO SCALE s V L s V a C .j a ° N E v ny` W C L /� LL w 4J Tushie S V Montgomery As Inc. 3300 Ed;-D .q- W.T. '601 Mmn....G.. Mi...s.l. 55.35 613 - 830-8206 FM! a30-8215 WITCHER Oe•wi9'LM[ N COFO[reEL Yp DSY1r.1W Wr Yit BC. rngNr IN .er. s e *rt. L caA'P. L s a "cae� vie:cui�ascavco. D".. By Pro'.ct A,Chit..t lY Checked By TL, GT Dal. 2-9 -98 Re,W..s '.ta..aae.e ■tiO! no q S4 9LQ! P—ct N. 993Ou L2.2 LJ w Cr V, UL 0 V, V, ui 3 C1 LANDSCAPE PLAN — OPTION THREE SULE I' . AO' -O' RueBER NDSe GUT MIRES (S PER TREE) Y RIVER ROCK W FILTER P TREE ,RAP A' MULL BE- 57 EL POSTS MuLCN ENTRC BED (i' DEEP) A 6AY 1 14' PLASTIC ED�eG�EY REMOVE BURLAP IA FROM TOP SOD SPECIFIED SOIL MI / FOUND OF COMPACTED SOIL FINISH GRADE) _ I•i'- .�...�..�� TO SUPPORT TREE STAR / COMPACTED SUBGR4BC NOTE. SIZE OF TREE MT SOIL 15 BASED ON SIZE ROOT BAL OF BALL 2 PLANTING I _ 3 ND SokLE MULCH NO SCALE NORMANDALE / IPP.N YmI .FNe, ROAD I I �I I � I i I I Lw ants rW ,rlsi,, I MULCH (A'DEEP) REMOVE BURLAP �„• �,,., SEE EDGE OF A FROM TOP MULW DETAIL FINISH GRAD! COy ACTED SUBGRADE - SOIL MIXTIR! NDTE, MUILU LATER TO e� COVER ENTIRE BED AREA. 4 NO SCALE Q DETAIL 0 TORPpp19 Tuft -_ 01— TRas wa �� VPAVING EDGE- START 50D FLUS11 WITII PAVING SOD ACROSS SLOPE NOT DCI N SLOPE STAGGER SOD SO SEAMS 00 NOT LINE UP SOD ONLr DISTURBED AREAS AND VAR' ENDING POINT TO PREVENT WA.SNO.ITS 5 ND SCALE AI s v L S V a � o a a 'L U C N v C 0-. w N .� s V - T.rw�► T4,9h a Montgomery A99OC�Ota5 Inc. 3300 ECneo —gh Wey. •601 Minn,aoo4]. Mi—W. 5'5-35 617 -BJO -8208 FAX: 830-8215 WITCHER ED1 f.O, - E xD I � N D,SwuIM Iu. xp, S r/K ,Rx CwAx, D RG,] IF RH. 9SS.JLL�,44.KD. D,D.n By P,.l.cl A.DN,.C, TN Checked By TL. CT DO,. 2-9.98 Revisions • 41O011119 R8010 Me aa]e.m is no ale] P-i-1 No. L2.3 NORMANDALE 1- V) UL 0 1— Lu i LANDSCAPE PLAN - OPTION SCALE 1' AO' -0' ROAD I � I I I i I ,,.. DCJ�101R TREE wee o. Tom+ r.a�.N r nr. PAVING EDGE- START SOD RUBBER KOBE FLUSH WITH PAVING GUT WIRES (S PER TREE) 2' RIVER ROCK W/ FILTER F SOD ACRO55 SLOPE NOT DOWN SLOPE TREE WRAP 4' MULCH B STEEL POSTS MULCH (R• DEEP) tXll ru ENT1R! BED DEEP) R 616'c 1 /ALPL—A5M EDGE NETpyC BURLAP ,,, , SEE EDGE OF R[MOV! BURLAP IA PROYI TOP .AD 0 0, FRO+ TOP i I'.lL01 DETAIL SPECIFIED SOL MIXTURE FINISH GRADMOUND OP COMPACTED SOIL FR9S11 GRAD! TO SUPPORT TREE STAC fO0ALTED 9YBrdEADE COMPACTED ' SOIL MOnIR! STAGGER SOD SO SEAMS 00 NOTE, SIZE OF TREE PIT SOL MIXTU MOTE. M AXW LATER TO u3 NOT LINE UP IS BASED ON SIZE ROOT I � ENTIRE N.n SOD ONLY DISTURBED AREAS AND VARY ENDING POINT TO m BALL PREVENT WA,u0UT9 2 WG NO scA a IN AI 3 ND BGALE I 4 NO SCALE AI 5 ND BRLE I s u s U a � o d m N v � c (L w N s U Tushic Monlgomcry Associates Inc. w�su • Pels,..AWINI. t. IN,YPv • cl.e 3700 E6rEa.augh Way. •601 A1+In. c's. M .ota 65435 612-630-8208 FAX= 970-8215 WITCHER `V. »o L.�REOi rte � �Fa� MD lm:l.urs lu r a N.a .on iK —T. T .errz�roeAl . wl LvrXw w soot aT cvr.ar .lo ar.R..¢ Ma M[4T RTRC4l. M;yINLp. OrR n Br P'Giect Mchit"t TY Chectae By A. DT Bat. 2.9-98 • r,ee tree r 49tr911 r an elen Preeet Ne. L2.4 ,I 0 • �r� .o�.�••�: =tom I 0; '4000 M wil i K; iffl, , veli AM D n z C LANDSCAPE SCREENING ALONG EAST PROPERTY LINE 9r• o r• .... . � 1 1. � _. (. � y•rr�l 1 1. �r —. — — MOM LM I / /I \\\ 'I 1. 11 n•- ' / /W- .... ... :AIL".. .... 'tn_ i • /lI \\' -�IIFn [A9T FltOtewfl' LINE• — . — . — . — . — . — . r1LA DSCAPE SCREENING ALONG EAST PROPERTY LINE SCALE I. - 10' -0" TREE KEY ® NW DEG000IA TREE NEW EVCRGREOI TREE OEK19nNG DECID110Ve TR!! ® aw1w. EVOtGam Tim i ^ \ REI70VED MSTM DffJ01 mm nm (% REMOVED 9K19TIW. rVOtGREEN TREE I / ^.— — T 1 WY ROA A1[[. catreo.l no oTK..�,..[ KZ6. 9tCiGlt• [pq.1 p m.n a as[nvca I r I T 7 L s u V a C o a � •L U 41 � //�� C 4L W - V TuShi¢ Monlgoma r y A490CIOl¢9 Inc. 3300 EdM-. N way. •601 .immpeli.. M seta 55435 617. 930 -9208 EN1.830 -8215 WITCHER �\y ^.— — T 1 WY ROA A1[[. catreo.l no oTK..�,..[ KZ6. 9tCiGlt• [pq.1 p m.n a as[nvca Dl— By Pre'eel Menil.el TN CN .L .E By T[. CT Data 7-9-¢8 Ra.ision. • rxRe. � r M rs w 30 far PrP'ett No. l .o n-: C o a N 'L U 5 N a C (L w N s V Tushie Montgomery Associates Inc. . wart. . 3300 EEi.ftvo t %0,, •601 MimmaoGS. M Sota 55535 611 -530 -8708 FM: 830-B7t5 WITCHER aBBpWeleet pf B[ e1pl n.T— ram - ++n tasn cL cu T t can a vvBtat. Bra oi�cs.e..ec M4B+ 4[6[41• eCB[eK0. D +o.n By Project wmiten TY Chect. By TI. DT Data 7.9.08 Revn�ana • Ss>as 0010 0 ■1p eNK Be 1y SOT Pra ect No. L3.1 A E 9.7 TG =85 BG=859.2 o° o° } 869.5 TW =867.0 PL B W =864.5 TG =863.2 BG =862.7 as as d> ao TW =B76.0 78.5 B W =873.0 TC =871.7 BC B7 C PL U TC =873.2 BC B72.7 ea °O d> do 82.5 E TW =879.0 PL B W =876.5 TG =875.2 BC 874.7 SCALE I/6' . r -0• ea t:L e° p BBB.O G TC =884.5 BC =884.0 ?L s ° as a° do do 890.0 N il TG =885.5 PL BC =885.0 as as ae no TC =879.3 BG =878.8 PL 'j 5G =872.5 PL a ° as o0 v> de K 72.5 TG =872.9 BC =872.4 PL 2 SCALE vs• . r_o. SCREEN SECTIONS - NORT14 s u L s U 0 C o 6 N 'L U `W C T s N L 0- W 41 N L s U f00,10,0, TUshic Montgomery A ssocia es Inc. 3300 EfnDOroapa way. •601 Mirm.a "/A -ola 33438 612- 630.8208 FM1830 -8215 WITCHER `-. No T.v.Dwc wucur .wyt rner¢N tae.r rK Nm.rccr. ap r. 6 -r MwtOir(-,..( KID S.EfYtIY. 44.KD. wD.e ey Pro'., Arcrtitmt TM Checked By TL, OT oat. x -a•os Rari.iom • sane resin r ■n0 leS q 6t4 �Qf Proect Ne. L3.2 .2 w W Ly Cr UL t 0 I- 3 NORMANDALE ROAD ...... ...... LOT �I al r T): i r. � r RY +9 I I 5 27 I I . I w HC I HC FG HL ii i I 19 19 19 I I OTAL PA KP10 SPALE5 KII, 5 IIPHSAESE ONE . 1 . I 2 JcDr :A21 I! i I - I lAfi DEVaOPMENf SUMMARY -OFAL SORE AMA 402.752 S.F. (93 MALES) EANO 5T 57E AREA 294.7905T. (6t A0ff5) ADMONAL50EAREA '01N&C25ACIMS) BASE A[EA KATD 5659051. HS FLOOR AMA RATIO 01084 SF. 35 i PAFJMGIWAL 3 221$1851. 5651 OPEN AREA '18756 51. 2951 rc1Al 402.132 51. '001 BLADOG AREA EXSTOGBND6f PINSE OBE PlNSE TWO ram LOMER LEVI— Oj=5F. '4450 S.F. 051. 22300 S.F. kN111EyEL %36051. 4.400 i•. 970051. 565905F. WLEM 4900 S1. 63805F. 91005F. 3206051. 3RDLEVFL G9Y5F. 05A 9R0 S.F. 1993451. 'OPAL BLLDfG AREA 7L124 S.F. 3128051. 20.68051. OL0B45y. -OPAL PARKPG R_MXM -1 I PER 35EAT5 N SAW; k"(951) 395PACE5 'ARRRRi PR0A60 641 SPACES IK PARKN3 FRO/CED 5 SPALE9 \J s U L S V a C Q 0 N •L v (L w N L V .. 1 40; Tushie Monlgmn¢ry ABSOCiOf¢S Inc. 3300 Edlft—gh Way. •601 MirmeaDeG1, Minnslala 55435 612 - 830 -8206 FAX: 830.8215 --l— Dr... �a IIeA.eR9 .� K MIMRCI. ikWt9 6 CBF.Y.>a M0 4�. SF[Cyc4� YY.vEU. By Project McNtC TM checked By TL. OT Date 2.9.98 Re.W— • -sv w EIKRO • !O .01 28 m mR Project N.. L4.1 • _ _C' �S j � � Ir --k. i -"ter � �: r _ 1 M 1 FT Ji `- -• ' - - - 'r 1 — . T Vii"" - -. _ 71 TIT OOOOMMI M Flu Ila Uaw X-ma 0 -coop am nr z r : - STATISTICS U 1 om�lw ur twt rDt rUK wt/1�1 MX/MI w 12 czx� RWI At 43 - 1 - M1: 101M WAMIX Or LGQ D . t MO! 100. WAW a 12 UIfM7s . 1MID IM! OORMV O FAC101 MIN . 1 A1on Tt u�ehky Ammiates Inc- too "WM mama � _ RK mal w� a srrir••/nrrrrr .r�.�r�rr�o• 4.rrr irrrr aM w era a M wow wrss r v M M� wwarl�:a�� W MMQ ao aw .w.sw Iwl �mv � PIq�6 FIiR Wr FOR Ogll E0.0 1081 -81, 24' -011 39' -O' 4W -0" PHASE ONE - NEW FELLOWSHIP HALL PHASE PHAE EXISTING ONE REMO EL nmgsg7■. .� _��� -_I 1111• �� 1111Mill11 — r 111111111 s U L S V 0 C o � N .L U N O CL W N L s V TuShis Monlgomcry ASSOC10184 Ine. us myv. � s a�rwe. 3300 CSaE —gn way, •801 Mmn.a.ek.. w—.ata 55-33 812 -930 -9209 FAX: 830.9713 —11— a.lcalul+.o l.a.Tac aw.cs N. �a6 ro ;II =C1 OF .F.[B. vcvu.l. ac>svvco. Pre ac eMCnit.ct TY Dn.ek.a By TL. BT Dat. 2-9-98 Ravish -. ...8. Mcon ft .9.■...■ M .8 ow Pra'ect No. A1.0 M I N ' �q4EL FLOOR PLANN s u L s V a C o a a L u 4 N a 4Li C (L w N L s V Tushia Montgomery Associates Inc. .v+. t. . : ss�ae n�im.a. 3700 EmMwoVo way. •601 Mlmeso s, AG—to 55475 611- a30.8208 FA[ ;830 -8215 aurrc+.[[nutw Aw [.omsc nts wa « taio[sa wm IpY1OA1v W t Y Y[R 11[�(RY.f 1rt .sw �l CdkP1l IEpiS K 1 MO OMewS[. AR rticn 5.[OC.IL• s[YSV[0. vw`� Um r� 0— By TWGSK P-'ect Ncnit— Tu Chocked By TL. GT Dote 2-2-98 R-W— dp�m0 80 8111886 8801 10 no a1 Pre ect No. A1.1 � etsncmertcla �E wmemna ' SCALE IN' • V -0' A CA s u L s V a C o a � �L U x N � C L W N 'L s V Tushie Montgomery �99O010}e9 Inc. emeo.n+vr.0 k.. cey: .. sPee Pa.e. 3300 E6ft,,o gN woy. -601 ZmppY,. Mato 55435 612 - 830 -8208 r6, :830 -8215 WITCHER �:,:� •�:� : emra.a ro o:wrt �. wrrt�<or�i� Ne,.rze.. �EQT YC64L. ,C4MLL VW Umm LISM rum PUM D.p.n By Te /0SK P.Olecl Mcnii ecl TM Decked By TL, OT Del. 2-9.68 Show Ravakln, . � oll go m saw Prc'ect Np, A1.2 ------------------------------ S 63,-0, 71' -5° 126'-6' 52'-10" PHASE ONE - NEW SANCTUARY PHASE ONE - REMODEL EXISTING EXISTING n. PHASE TWO AT s w I °ns2 _ PM5E 9 ROOF a,m ° COUNSELING C .' a & ADULT m EDUCATION u C w 5� n_ 0 aeon N L oaome NEW 5ANCTUARY FLAT c W BELOW ROOF o . I S c,es.co. FLAT Tushie OOF Montgom w .c GiSJGY �tJmG e w �•B pIJ�C.f _ awssrm. _ _ O �..�ss wey. •801 ,n sm.� evuce sa f r IF F o'— By TM Pro'ect Mc i"" TY CnecMea By TL. 07 ROOF LEVEL FLOOR A ou�cmamc�. . meiunr N I,li• I'-0' 0 ------------------------------ S U L s V a C .' a o m 'L u C 5� Ca L W S V Tushie Montgom e r y As9oci0te9 Inc. 3300 EQnberoupb wey. •801 Minnf000tif. Af°vtfseta SSC]5 617 - 830 -8708 yA%: B]0 -8215 .Trrt�.....f a tva C.ZT t o 3 W C- "o o ,.er �crcn vT 11 -D. RW o'— By TM Pro'ect Mc i"" TY CnecMea By TL. 07 STEEPLE 2 -C RIDGE �0 MID P OF Rl $144- TOP C 130' -D-D TO MATCH i� 00-0 84--l- NEW SANCTUARY REMODEL rvcw �..�"+.00icwi-u EAST ELEVATION SCALE O' STEEPLE 23V -0, + - STEEPLES - 198 -0 -0 RIDGE DORMERS TO MATCH EXISTING $ 5B 0 ASPWALT SHINGLES MID POINT TO MATCH EXISTING OF RIDGE F144 -0� NEW PORTE COCHERE TOP OF EAVE 130' -0" 0 O co -o 100 -O NWITE BRICK AT BOW WINDOWS LOSER LEVEL RED M BRICK RE ATCH EXISTING, PHASE WHITE CLAD WINDOWS _ PWASE ONE ONE PWA5E ONE PWASE ONE TRASH GARAGE NEW SANCTUARY 6 FELLOWSWIP WALL NEW PORTE COCWERE ENCLOSURE SOUTH ELEVATION 2 / iWINGLES EXISTING 1D WINDOWS 0 �"JI .................... ........... - ............. . ...... ........ ...... DORMERS TO M ASPHALT S TO MATCH RED BRICK TO MATCH EXIST YyMIIC ORI{•I� hl O� /vr v.Iry WV.� PHASE ONE NEW CLASSROOMS - REMODEL NEW 5ANCTUAKT WEST ELEVATION SCALE NORTH ELEVATION 2 SCALE 1 /16' • 1' -0' NEW CLASSROOMS 5TEEPLE. 236 -0 ° RIDGE. ISB -0 MID POINT OF RIDGE 144'-0" TOP OF EAVE RED BRICK TO MATCH EXISTING I STS P 100' -0 LOWER LEV�ELA s u s U v � o a m 'L u x� N a c 1� W 4 L s U Loom TusWe Montgomery Associates Inc. �WWLSY LoOteeL �OiecY wYrb GLgen • Spev Nmve 7300 E6roarewpl Way, •801 M'en ofis. Afvmetala 85438 817 -830 -8708 FU: &10-8215 a�rura e.• of a u:x .r.an rleae .nrrd taeer tK rronecr. ewrs a ®.mn wa uiceea. �a: •:em. eeccrerL. aaev[o. soma D•a— By rY he'eet Metvleel TY eneetea B n. er Date 1 -1e -e8 R..ie a. • sssL �o.es 0 syssL na b es say eel No. A2.1 Notes IFBENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES, INC. TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS 7301 OHMS LANE, SUITE 500 / EDINA, MN 55439 / (612) 832 -9858 / FAX (612) 832 -9564 February 9, 1998 REFER TO FILE: 97 -37 MEMORANDUM TO: Peter Jarvis, Project Coordinator for Christ Presbyterian Church FROM: James A. Benshoof and Peter A. Hultgren AW RE: Results of Traffic and Parking Study For Expansion of Christ Presbyterian Church BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Christ Presbyterian Church proposes to accomplish a two phase program to expand its present facilities in the northeast corner of TH 100 and 70th Street. Our firm has been retained to address the traffic and parking effects of the proposed expansion. We collected a substantial amount of traffic and parking data to establish a sound foundation for this analysis, we established post- development traffic and parking forecasts, and then we analyzed the traffic and parking effects of the proposed Church expansion program. A principal focus of the analysis has been to determine whether the expansion program can be accomplished without causing adverse traffic or parking impacts on nearby neighborhoods. Our analysis accounts for both phases of Church expansion (i.e. complete build -out). The purpose of this memorandum is to present the data we have collected and our analysis results. Over 20 sheets presenting specific data and analysis results are attached to this memorandum. The attachment begins with a contents page to help the reader locate any particular data or analysis item. DESCRIPTION OF DATA COLLECTED The streets surrounding Christ Presbyterian Church consist of 70th Street to the south, the Frontage Road to the west, and the residential streets of 69th Street, Brittany Road and Dunberry Lane to the north and east. We collected extensive data to address all aspects of potential effects on these streets. The data collected for this traffic study include hourly traffic volumes for the residential streets, trips to and from the Church during Sunday, Tuesday, and Wednesday Church activities, parking accumulation in the Church parking lot during Sunday, Tuesday, and Wednesday Church activities, on- street parking activity Mr. Peter Jarvis -2- February 9, 1998 during Sunday and Tuesday Church activities, and neighborhood trips through the Church parking lot to gain access to 70th Street. DESCRIPTION OF ANALYSIS PERFORMED We have projected the post- development number of trips to and from the Church and parking accumulation during Sunday activities for four different access options. We also have projected future Sunday daily traffic volumes for the residential streets north and east of the Church and have projected future parking demand for the Church. These projections account for the full growth anticipated by the Church as a result of the complete expansion program. We then analyzed the traffic and parking projections to determine whether these functions could be adequately accommodated without causing any adverse impacts on nearby neighborhoods. This memorandum and its attachment address the effects of Church expansion on 70th Street, 69th Street, Brittany Road, and Dunberry Lane. The effects of Church expansion on the Frontage Road will be addressed in a supplementary memorandum submitted to the City's Planning Commission for its February 25th meeting. CONCLUSIONS Major conclusions that we have established from the data, forecasts, and analyses described above are as follows: Existing traffic volumes — Brittany Road/Dunberry Lane: - Traffic volumes are within normal levels for residential streets each day of the week. The transportation component of the Metropolitan Council's Regional Blueprint defines 1,000 vehicles per day as the maximum volume threshold for local streets. Existing volumes generally range from 200 to 650 vehicles per day. — Traffic volumes are higher due to Church traffic on Sundays, Tuesdays, and Wednesdays, but are still within normal levels (i.e. less than 1,000 vehicles per day). — 70th Street east of the Church driveway: — Two -way volume during the Sunday peak hour (705 vehicles) is much lower than the volume experienced during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. The volume during the weekday a.m. peak hour (1,319 vehicles) is nearly twice the Sunday volume, and the p.m. peak hour volume (1,890 vehicles) is nearly three times higher than on Sunday. — The current weekday average daily traffic volume on 70th Street is 20,609 vehicles per day (according to City of Edina 1997 M.S.A. traffic count data). Mr. Peter Jarvis -3- February 9, 1998 • Existing on- street parking — Sunday: On- street parking peaks between 9:30 -11:00 a.m., with about 33 vehicles parked on 69th Street, one on Brittany Road, and three on Dunberry Lane. — Tuesday: On- street parking peaks near 11:15 a.m., with about 39 vehicles parked on 69th Street, two on Brittany Road, and three on Dunberry Lane. Existing congestion on 69th Street — 69th Street is about 30 feet wide. Church users park on both sides of 69th Street during peak periods of on- street parking activity. This results in a single, narrow lane of travel between parked vehicles on either side that is not wide enough to accommodate two -way travel. This interferes with travel between the Frontage Road and the neighborhood or Church. Traffic safety on 69th Street is diminished when vehicles are forced to travel in reverse to avoid meeting opposing traffic head -on between the rows of parked vehicles on either side of 69th Street. • Trips by neighbors through Church parking lot to 70th Street — On a typical weekday, about 29 vehicles drive through the Church parking lot from Brittany Road or Dunberry Lane during the 6 -9 a.m. period in order to gain access to 70th Street. Post - development traffic on 70th Street east of the Church driveway — Two -way volume during the Sunday peak hour is expected to remain well below the volumes experienced during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. • Post - development Sunday daily traffic volumes on neighborhood streets Brittany Road Dunberry Lane Existing 509 266 Option 1 510 330 Option 2 170 170 Option 3 560 300 Option 4 390 200 One observation from the preceding table is that the volumes on Brittany Road and Dunberry Lane would drop substantially under option 2. The two reasons for this decline are that 69th Street would be eliminated, and no access would be provided between these streets and the Church parking lot. Another important finding from the above table is that the volumes would not increase substantially under any of the other alternatives. The largest potential increases would be 51 vehicles per day on Brittany Road and 64 vehicles per day on Dunberry Lane. In all instances the Mr. Peter Jarvis 4- February 9, 1998 volumes would remain well within the 1,000 vehicles per day threshold for residential streets established by the Metropolitan Council. • Adequacy of Church driveways to provide sufficient capacity for entering and exiting traffic — The Church's principal driveway located on 70th Street will continue to provide adequate capacity for Church traffic for the following two reasons: 1. This driveway will be upgraded to provide standard traffic lane alignments and widths 2. Police officer traffic control will continue to be provided for safe and effective traffic operation The capacity at the 70th Street driveway will be sufficiently adequate so that Church users will not be tempted to use other routings to avoid congestion at the 70th Street driveway. Other effects on neighborhood — All four Church expansion options eliminate the need for on- street parking on residential streets. — Options 1, 3, and 4 preserve access between the neighborhood and the Frontage Road. Option 2 does not provide this accessibility. — Options 1 and 3 preserve the opportunity for neighbors to drive through the Church lot to 70th Street. Options 2 and 4 do not provide this accessibility. — All four options will eliminate the existing congestion on 69th Street. Based on the conclusions listed above, we have determined that the expansion program proposed by Christ Presbyterian Church would effectively meet the traffic and parking needs. No adverse traffic impacts would be experienced on neighborhood streets. The neighborhoods would gain a benefit from existing conditions through the prohibition of on- street parking on neighborhood streets by Church users. Attachment: Traffic and Parking Study For Christ Presbyterian Church -- Data And Analysis Exhibits 1wBENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES, INC. TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS 7301 OHMS LANE, SUITE 500/ EDINA, MN 55439/ (612) 832-9858/ FAX (612) 832 -9564 February 9, 1998 REFER TO FILE: 97-37 TRAFFIC AND PARKING STUDY FOR CHRIST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH — DATA AND ANALYSIS EXHIBITS CONTENTS Page Existing Daily Traffic Volumes on Neighborhood Streets .............................. 1 Hourly Traffic Volumes on 69th Street .......................... ............................... 2 Hourly Traffic Volumes on Brittany Road ...................... ............................... 3 Hourly Traffic Volumes on Dunberry Lane .................... ............................... 4 Sunday Traffic and Parking Survey (3 sheets) ................ ............................... 5 Tuesday Traffic and Parking Survey (4 sheets) ............... ............................... 8 Wednesday Traffic and Parking Survey (2 sheets) .......... ............................... 12 Neighborhood Traffic Using Church Parking Lot as a Short -Cut Route (3 sheets) ............................... ............................... 14 Principal Steps to Estimate Post - Development Traffic and Parking Demand ........................................... ............................... 17 Estimated Post - Development Parking Accumulation at Christ Presbyterian Church for a Typical Sunday Under Proposed Schedule A .............................. ............................... 18 Estimated Post - Development Parking Accumulation at Christ Presbyterian Church for a Typical Sunday Under Proposed Schedule B .............................. ............................... 19 Post - Development Sunday Traffic Volumes with Closure of 69th Street and Access to Brittany Road (Option 1) ....... ............................... 20 Post - Development Sunday Traffic Volumes with Closure of 69th Street (Option 2) .................................................... ............................... 21 Post - Development Sunday Traffic Volumes with Reconstruction of 69th Street and Access to 69th Street (Option 3) ........ ............................... 22 Post - Development Sunday Traffic Volumes with Reconstruction of 69th Street and Closure of Access to 69th Street (Option 4) ...................... 23 Forecast Post- Development Sunday Daily Traffic Volumes on Neighborhood Streets ...................... ............................... 24 Comparison of Peak Hour Traffic Volumes on 70th Street ............................ 25 1wBENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES, INC. TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS 7301 OHMS LANE, SUITE 500/ EDINA, MN 55439/ (612) 832-9858/ FAX (612) 832 -9564 February 9, 1998 REFER TO FILE: 97-37 EXISTING DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES ON NEIGHBORHOOD STREETS' Number of Vehicles Recorded April 19 -24, 1997 1 The transportation component of the Metropolitan Council's Regional Blueprint defines 1,000 vehicles per day as the maximum volume threshold for local streets. 1 69th Street Brittany Road Dunberry Lane Saturday 424 485 197 Sunday 642 509 266 Monday 598 544 222 Tuesday 650 528 320 Wednesday 592 630 260 Thursday 495 517 238 1 The transportation component of the Metropolitan Council's Regional Blueprint defines 1,000 vehicles per day as the maximum volume threshold for local streets. 1 N HOURLY TRAFFIC VOLUMES ON 69th STREET EDINA, MN HOUR OF DAY DAY 1 4/18/97 Frida DAY 2 4/19/97 Saturday DAY 3 4/20/97 Sunda DAY 4 4/21/97 Monday DAY 5 4/22/97 Tuesda DAY 6 [wzdnesdayl /23/97 DAY 7 4/24/97 Thursday DAY 8 lvvrEKDAY 4/25/97 Frida AVERAGE OVERALL AVERAGE 12 -1 a.m. 6 6 2 0 1 3 1 1 3 1 -2 3 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 2 -3 1 0 0 0 2 1 1 1 1 3-4 1 3 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 4 -5 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 5-6 2 1 9 3 3 2 1 4 3 6 -7 2 1 18 11 15 9 6 12 9 7 -8 7 10 20 27 25 27 23 24 20 8 -9 21 42 34 31 19 33 25 28 29 9 -10 27 85 23 50 21 19 18 26 35 10 -11 21 102 19 33* 25 22 19 24 34 11 -12 22 28 39 107* 28 27 23 45 39 12 -1 p.m. 40 91 26 38 25 35 17 28 39 1 -2 27 31 36 49 28 32 31 35 33 2 -3 31 24 37 29 20 33 26 29 29 3-4 34 28 34 33 36 26 42 34 33 4 -5 41 29 45 50 39 43 34 42 40 5-6 32 30 78 43 54 50 56 48 6 -7 28 48 65 41 95 41 61 53 7 -8 17 27 29 39 38 31 34 30 8 -9 17 25 27 24 24 70 27 32 31 9 -10 14 14 15 40 19 34 23 26 23 10 -11 11 16 9 13 12 8 7 10 11 11 -12 14 6 3 6 9 5 2 7 6 Totals 56 424 642 598 1 650 1 592 495 270 562 1 551 " Estimated from driveway counts of Tuesday, May 6 1997 ADT = 551 W HOURLY TRAFFIC VOLUMES ON BRITTANY ROAD EDINA, MN HOUR OF DAY DAY 1 4/18/97 Fridav DAY 2 4/19/97 Saturclav DAY 3 4/20/97 Sundav DAY 4 4/21/97 Mondav DAY 5 J 4/22/97 Tuesday DAY 6 4/23/97 W ednesday DAY 7 4/24/97 Thursday DAY 8 4/25/97 Friday WEEKDAY AVERAGE OVERALL AVERAGE 12 -1 a.m. 12 6 2 0 0 3 2 1 4 1 -2 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 2 -3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3-4 0 4 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 4 -5 1 0 2 0 2 4 1 2 1 5-6 0 3 7 2 2 1 1 3 2 6 -7 3 0 17 7 12 7 8 10 8 7 -8 9 12 17 18 22 27 21 21 18 8 -9 23 33 31 29 30 39 31 32 31 9 -10 1 40 64 25 33 25 15 17 23 31 10 -11 29 56 15 24 26 21 15 20 27 11 -12 31 27 32 34 37 25 26 31 30 12 -1 p.m. 45 61 23 35 22 41 26 29 36 1 -2 27 26 27 44 34 48 32 37 34 2-3 29 20 34 38 33 36 35 35 32 3-4 32 27 39 46 53 35 53 45 41 4 -5 32 33 30 37 55 50 40 43 40 5-6 57 34 28 64 45 50 47 53 46 6 -7 33 40 45 64 33 81 36 49 47 7 -8 56 18 17 27 31 37 30 36 31 8 -9 22 19 21 28 20 64 25 32 28 0 17 24 16 32 14 34 23 24 23 11 18 18 8 14 11 10 14 13 13 12 14 11 5 6 7 6 0 7 7 als LADT 249 485 509 544 528 630 517 271 548 533 = 533 HOURLY TRAFFIC VOLUMES ON DUNBERRY LANE EDINA, MN HOUR OF DAY DAY 1 4/18/97 Friday DAY 2 4/19/97 Saturday DAY 3 4/20/97 Sunday DAY 4 4/21/97 Monday DAY 5 4/22/97 Tuesday DAY 6 4/23/97 Wednesday DAY 7 4/24/97 Thursday DAYS 4/25/97 Friday WEEKDAY AVERAGE OVERALL AVERAGE 12 -1 a.m. 4 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 -2 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 -3 1 0 0 0 2 1 1 1 1 3-4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 -5 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5-6 2 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 6 -7 0 1 3 5 2 1 1 2 2 7 -8 4 7 16 15 11 11 12 13 11 8 -9 10 11 9 12 9 13 7 10 10 9 -10 12 37 12 21 6 11 9 12 15 10 -11 10 59 1 14 10 11 7 9 16 11 -12 12 16 14 90 23 9 8 29 25 12 -1 p.m. 12 41 11 18 14 24 13 16 19 1 -2 15 12 13 12 15 20 10 14 14 2 -3 14 10 10 12 8 20 17 13 13 3-4 11 15 19 28 31 18 31 25 22 4 -5 9 15 12 21 20 27 19 18 19 18 5-6 24 21 13 32 19 26 24 25 23 6 -7 17 14 8 20 17 32 10 19 17 7 -8 19 10 5 14 10 8 10 12 11 8 -9 10 15 10 12 14 25 16 15 15 9 -10 7 6 2 6 8 6 8 7 6 10 -11 2 1 3 5 3 1 9 4 3 11 -12 6 3 0 1 1 1 1 2 2 Totals 94 197 266 222 320 260 238 135 250 245 ADT = 245 Sunday Traffic and Parking Survey — Sheet 1 of 3 Parking Accumulation at Christ Presbyterian Church During Worship Services And Education Hours As Observed On May 4,1997 Note: In addition to the vehicles In the parking lot, there were 49 parked vehicles observed on the surrounding streets at about 11 a.m. Inbound and outbound volumes are estimates based on the curren church schedule and actual observations from 8 a.m. to 12 p.m. 5 Vehicles Parked Vehicles Time Period in out Beginning End 8:00 -8:15 83 3 38 118 8:15 -8:30 25 1 118 4:42 8:30 -8:45 13 2 142 153 8:45 -9:00 21 5 153 169 9:00 -9:15 139 39 169 269 9:15 -9:30 108 83 269 294 9:30 -9:45 19 15 294 298 9:45 -10:00 14 13 298 299 10:00 -10:15 10 16 299 293 10:15 -10:30 55 25 293 323 10:30 -10:45 131 .160 323 294 10:45 -11:00 46 75 294 265 11:00 -11:15 7 36 265 236 11:15 -11:30 6 6 236 236 11:30 -11:45 8 12 236 232 11:45 -12:00 11 49 232 194 • 12:00 -12:15 5 111 194 88 • 12:15 -12:30 5 55 88 38 Totals 706 706 Note: In addition to the vehicles In the parking lot, there were 49 parked vehicles observed on the surrounding streets at about 11 a.m. Inbound and outbound volumes are estimates based on the curren church schedule and actual observations from 8 a.m. to 12 p.m. 5 O W O O cr L_ 39 7 69TH STREET �O 86 62 oQOC m 106 J 27 34 � *� 83 34 39 DUNBERRY LANE 145 NORTH DRIVEWAY 140 184 --) 45 38 WEST DRIVEWAY CHRIST 522 521 PRESBYTERIAN T CHURCH SOUTH 375 DRIVEWAY 70TH STREET 147 372 Qt L-- 80 439 3 441 2 DATA COLLECTED MAY 4, 1997 N NOT TO SCALE TUSHIE MONTGOMERY TRAFFIC STUDY I-T XISTING SUNDAY TRAFFIC ASSOCIATES, INC. ND PARKING SURVEY FOR HEET 2 OF 3 CHRIST PRESBYTERIAN RIPS TO AND FROM CHURCH lw BENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES, INC. CHURCH :OO AM - 2:30 PM TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS Block Face SUNDAY TRAFFIC AND PARKING SURVEY SHEET 3 OF 3 ON- STREET PARKING ACTIVITY 8:00 A.M. TO 12:30 P.M. February 1, 1998 Total Number of Different Vehicles Observed February 1, 1998 Number of Vehicles and Time of Maximum Observed Parking Accumulation May 4, 1997 Number of Vehicles and Time of Maximum Observed Parking Accumulation North Curb of 70th Street, east of church driveway 6 5 at 10:30 9 at 9:30 North Curb of 70th Street, west of church driveway 0 0 at all times 0 at all times South Curb of 70th Street 0 0 at all times 0 at all times West Curb of Frontage Road 0 0 at all times 0 at all times East Curb of Frontage Road, south of church driveway 8 7 at 11:00 10 at 11:00 East Curb of Frontage Road, between driveway and 69th Street 1 1 at 10:30 1 at 11:00 East Curb of Frontage Road, north of 69th Street 1 1 at 11:00 4 at 11:00 North Curb of 69th Street 25 17 at 9:30 14 at 11:00 South Curb of 69th Street, west of church driveway 17 12 at 10:00 5 at 11:00 South Curb of 69th Street, east of church driveway 15 10 at 9:30 8 at 11:00 Dunberry Lane 0 0 at 9:30 6 at 9:00 Brittany Road 0 0 at all times 2 at 9:30 Totals 73 42 at 9:30 49 at 11:00 Tuesday Traffic and Parking Survey — Sheet 1 of 4 Parking Accumulation at Christ Presbyterian Church at Completion of Bible Study Fellowship As Observed On May 6, 1997 Note: In addition to the vehicles in the parking lot, there were 69 parked vehicles observed on the surrounding streets at about 11:15 a.m. 8 Vehicles Parked Vehicles Time Period in out Beginning End 11:15 -11:30 5 20 347 332 11:30 -11:45 6 132 332 206 11:45 -12:00 9 147 206 68 12:00 -12:15 6 29 68 45 Note: In addition to the vehicles in the parking lot, there were 69 parked vehicles observed on the surrounding streets at about 11:15 a.m. 8 Q O cc W O O w 69TH STREET 0 4 4 9 WEST DRIVEWAY CHRIST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH 2p 5 7 �cc m 10 ' DUNBERRY LANE 69 NORTH DRIVEWAY IT 9 79 249 8 IT I I 0 70TH STREET 59 SOUTH DRIVEWAY 188 `*= 3 2 5 5 0 DATA COLLECTED MAY B, 1997 N NOT TO SCALE TUSHIE MONTGOMERY TRAFFIC STUDY EXISTING TUESDAY TRAFFIC ASSOCIATES, INC. AND PARKING SURVEY FOR SHEET 2 OF 4 CHRIST PRESBYTERIAN TRIPS TO AND FROM CHURCH BENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES, INC. CHURCH TRANSPORTATION ENQI NEE RS AND PLANNERS 11:15 AM -12:15 PM 0 5 t� 62 10 ' DUNBERRY LANE 69 NORTH DRIVEWAY IT 9 79 249 8 IT I I 0 70TH STREET 59 SOUTH DRIVEWAY 188 `*= 3 2 5 5 0 DATA COLLECTED MAY B, 1997 N NOT TO SCALE TUSHIE MONTGOMERY TRAFFIC STUDY EXISTING TUESDAY TRAFFIC ASSOCIATES, INC. AND PARKING SURVEY FOR SHEET 2 OF 4 CHRIST PRESBYTERIAN TRIPS TO AND FROM CHURCH BENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES, INC. CHURCH TRANSPORTATION ENQI NEE RS AND PLANNERS 11:15 AM -12:15 PM O O cc W C7 O 1 C1 69TH STREET 13 Irl WEST DRIVEWAY 04 CHRIST r- PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH 70TH STREET 17- NORTH DRIVEWAY SOUTH DRIVEWAY 7 10 �O C4 �O �cc m 3 DUNBERRYLANE X - PEAK NUMBER OF VEHICLES OBSERVED DATA COLLECTED MAY 6. 1997 TUSHIE MONTGOMERY TUESDAY TRAFFIC AND ASSOCIATES, INC. TRAFFIC STUDY PARKING SURVEY FOR SHEET 3 OF 4 CHRIST PRESBYTERIAN PEAK ON- STREET PARKING BENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES, INC. CHURCH OBSERVATIONS AT 11:15 AM TRANSPORTATIONENOINEERSANDPLANNERS O cc w O El 69TH STREET WEST cr DRIVEWAY CHRIST �+ PRESBYTERIAN r CHURCH 70TH STREET 6 16 10 NORTH DRIVEWAY SOUTH DRIVEWAY 7 2p Q N �CC QD 3 DUNBERRY LANE X - PEAK NUMBER OF VEHICLES OBSERVED DATA COLLECTED FEBRUARY 3, 1998 TUSHIE MONTGOMERY TUESDAY TRAFFIC AND ASSOCIATES, INC. TRAFFIC STUDY PARKING SURVEY FOR SHEET 4 OF 4 CHRIST PRESBYTERIAN PEAK ON- STREET PARKIJNG BENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES, INC. CHURCH OBSERVATIONS AT 11:15 TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS 13 WEST cr DRIVEWAY CHRIST �+ PRESBYTERIAN r CHURCH 70TH STREET 6 16 10 NORTH DRIVEWAY SOUTH DRIVEWAY 7 2p Q N �CC QD 3 DUNBERRY LANE X - PEAK NUMBER OF VEHICLES OBSERVED DATA COLLECTED FEBRUARY 3, 1998 TUSHIE MONTGOMERY TUESDAY TRAFFIC AND ASSOCIATES, INC. TRAFFIC STUDY PARKING SURVEY FOR SHEET 4 OF 4 CHRIST PRESBYTERIAN PEAK ON- STREET PARKIJNG BENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES, INC. CHURCH OBSERVATIONS AT 11:15 TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS Wednesday Traffic and Parking Survey — Sheet 1 of 2 Parking Accumulation at Christ Presbyterian Church During Wednesday Evening Youth and Choir Activities As Observed On May 7, 1997 Note: In addition to the vehicles in the parking lot, there was 1 parked vehicle observed on the surrounding streets from 6:30 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. 12 Vehicles Parked Vehicles Time Period in out Beginning End 6:30 -6:45 71 57 94 108 6:45 -7:00 17 25 108 100 7:00 -7:15 8 8 100 100 7:15 -7:30 4 4 100 100 7:30 -7:45 7 10 100 97 7:45 -8:00 42 29 97 110 8:00 -8:15 39 87 110 62 8:15 -8:30 12 59 62 15 8:30 -8:45 5 12 15 8 8:45 -9:00 2 3 8 7 9:00 -9:15 2 3 7 6 9:15 -9:30 1 3 6 4 Note: In addition to the vehicles in the parking lot, there was 1 parked vehicle observed on the surrounding streets from 6:30 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. 12 rn a W • t!13 69TH STREET 0 13 4 F— 4 1 56 —) 15 15 WEST DRIVEWAY CHRIST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH 56 42 NORTH DRIVEWAY T 55 239 139 1 TI 94 70TH STREET 46 191 1 3 1 102 04 1 IF 2 SOUTH DRIVEWAY 2p 42 cc CC i , 1 14 20 DUNBERRYLANE DATA COLLECTED MAY 7, 1997 N NOT TO SCALE TUSHIE MONTGOMERY TRAFFIC STUDY EXISITNG WEDNESDAY TRAFFIC ASSOCIATES, INC. AND PARKING SURVEY FOR SHEET 2 OF 2 CHRIST PRESBYTERIAN TRIPS TO AND FROM CHURCH BENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES, INC. CHURCH 6'30 PM - 9.30 PM TRANSPORTATION ENO INEERBAND PLANNERS 69TH STREET 2/8 0/0 WEST DRIVEWAY 3/13 CHRIST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH 70TH STREET 3/0 NORTH DRIVEWAY 0 2 N �O 10/2 DUNBERRYLANE 7 -9 AM 4-6 PM xxm NOTES: • SURVEY PERFORMED ON WEDNESDAY, MAY 7, 1997 • SOUTH DRIVEWAY DURING THE 7 -9 AM PERIOD, 23 OF THE 31 TOTAL VEHICLES (74 %) FROM BRITTANY ROAD AND DUNBERRY LANE TRAVELED THROUGH THE CHURCH PARKING LOT. N NOT TO SCALE TUSHIE MONTGOMERY NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC ASSOCIATES, INC. TRAFFIC STUDY USING CHURCH PARKING FOR LOT AS A SHORT CUT ROUTE CHRIST PRESBYTERIAN SHEET 1 OF 3 BENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES, INC. CHURCH WEDNESDAY AM AND PM TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS PEAK PERIODS O W O O L 69TH STREET 1 WEST DRIVEWAY 4 CHRIST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH 70TH STREET 4 20 6 NORTH DRIVEWAY ZD N �O �cc I 11 DUNBERRY LANE NOTES: • SURVEY PERFORMED ON THURSDAY, JANUARY 29, 1998 • SOUTH DRIVEWAY DURING THE 6 -9 AM PERIOD, 26 OF THE 36 TOTAL VEHICLES (72 %) FROM BRITTANY ROAD AND DUNBERRY LANE TRAVELED THROUGH THE CHURCH PARKING LOT. N L NOT TO SCALE FWTRI USHIE MONTGOMERY TRAFFIC STUDY NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC ASSOCIATES, INC. USING CHURCH PARKING FOR LOT AS A SHORT CUT ROUTE CHRIST PRESBYTERIAN SHEET 2 OF 3 NSHOOF & ASSOCIATES, INC. CHURCH ANS PORTATIONENGINEERSANDPLANNERS THURSDAY AM PEAK PERIOD p O e: W C7 O 69TH STREET 3 2' WEST DRIVEWAY CHRIST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH Ei 70TH STREET 0 19 13 NORTH DRIVEWAY 2p N �O f � 15 DUNBERRYLANE NOTES: • SURVEY PERFORMED ON FRIDAY, JANUARY 30, 1998 • SOUTH DRIVEWAY DURING THE 6-9 AM PERIOD, 32 OF THE 42 TOTAL VEHICLES (76 %) FROM BRITTANY ROAD AND DUNBERRY LANE TRAVELED THROUGH THE CHURCH PARKING LOT. N NOT TO SCALE TUSHIE MONTGOMERY TRAFFIC STUDY NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC ASSOCIATES, INC. USING CHURCH PARKING FOR LOT AS A SHORT CUT ROUTE CHRIST PRESBYTERIAN SHEET 3 OF 3 BENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES, INC. CHURCH TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS FRIDAY AM PEAK PERIOD 1WBENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES, INC. TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS 7301 OHMS LANE, SUITE 500 / EDINA, MN 55439 / (612) 832 -9858 / FAX (612) 832 -9564 February 9, 1998 REFER TO FILE: 97 -37 PRINCIPAL STEPS TO ESTIMATE POST - DEVELOPMENT' TRAFFIC AND PARKING DEMAND 1. Observe and record current traffic at all church driveways on Sunday morning. 2. Add in vehicle trips to account for observed on- street parking. 3. Add in vehicle trips to account for observed vehicles parked remotely at Cornelia School. 4. Deduct bus trips (estimated at 8 per hour) from existing counts. 5. Increase the church traffic by a 35% growth factor to account for anticipated growth between 1997 (year of traffic observations) and 2005. 1 This accounts for both phases 1 and 2 of the church expansion program 17 Estimated Post - Development Parking Accumulation at Christ Presbyterian Church for a Typical Sunday Under Proposed Schedule A* Totals 1071 1071 Note: This assumes that the parking lot is large enough to accommodate all vehicles so that on- street parking is not necessary " Schedule A consists of an 8:30 worship service, a 9:45 education hour, and an 11:00 worship service. 18 Vehicles Parked Vehicles Time Period In Out Beginning End 8:00 -8:15 55 5 22 72 8:15 -8:30 120 16 72 176 8:30 -8:45 77 33 176 220 8:45 -9:00 22 11 220 231 9:00 -9:15 33 11 231 253 9:15 -9:30 131 44 253 340 9:30 -9:45 120 66 340 394 9:45 -10:00 120 87 394 427 10:00 -10:15 22 11 427 438 10:15 -10:30 33 11 438 460 10:30 -10:45 26 22 460 464 10:45 -11:00 186 218 464 432 11:00 -11:15 66 109 432 389 11:15 -11:30 22 55 389 356 11:30 -11:45 11 11 356 356 11:45 -12:00 11 22 356 345 12:00 -12:15 11 230 345 126 12:15 -12:30 5 109 126 22 Totals 1071 1071 Note: This assumes that the parking lot is large enough to accommodate all vehicles so that on- street parking is not necessary " Schedule A consists of an 8:30 worship service, a 9:45 education hour, and an 11:00 worship service. 18 Estimated Post - Development Parking Accumulation at Christ Presbyterian Church for a Typical Sunday Under Proposed Schedule B * Totals 1088 1082 Note: This assumes that the parldng lot is large enough to accommodate all vehicles so that on- street parking is not necessary Schedule B consists of a concurrent 9:00 a.m. worship service and education hour and a concurrent 10:30 a.m. worship service and education hour. 19 Vehicles Parked Vehicles Time Period In Out Beginning End 8:00 -8:15 33 2 5 36 8:15 -8:30 44 9 36 71 8:30 -8:45 153 33 71 191 8:45 -9:00 175 33 191 333 9:00 -9:15 33 22 333 344 9:15 -9:30 22 11 344 355 9:30 -9:45 77 33 355 399 9:45 -10:00 87 77 399 409 10:00 -10:15 153 98 409 464 10:15 -10:30 175 109 464 530 10:30 -10:45 66 141 530 455 10:45 -11:00 11 77 455 389 11:00 -11:15 11 11 389 389 11:15 -11:30 11 22 389 378 11:30 -11:45 22 164 378 236 11:45 -12:00 5 109 236 132 12:00 -12:15 5 87 132 50 12:15 -12:30 5 44 50 11 Totals 1088 1082 Note: This assumes that the parldng lot is large enough to accommodate all vehicles so that on- street parking is not necessary Schedule B consists of a concurrent 9:00 a.m. worship service and education hour and a concurrent 10:30 a.m. worship service and education hour. 19 O O a W O O 60 f 60 --110 110 RECONSTRUCTED WEST DRIVEWAY 135 2 O ti; OC 173 -c 234 134 NEW 38 EAST DRIVEWAY DUNBERRYLANE cr- CHRIST 799 810 PRESBYTERIAN I T CHURCH SOUTH 595 DRIVEWAY 70TH STREET 204 59 127 681 683 2 2 N NOT TO SCALE TUSHIE MONTGOMERY POST-DEVELOPMENT SUNDAY ASSOCIATES, INC. TRAFFIC STUDY TRIPS TO AND FROM CHURCH FOR 8:00 AM -12:30 PM WITH CHRIST PRESBYTERIAN CLOSURE OF 69TH ST. AND BENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES, INC. CHURCH ACCESS TO BRITTANY ROAD TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS (OPTION 1) O O c[ W 160 110 RECONSTRUCTED WEST DRIVEWAY F— 160 —* 110 CHRIST 933 PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH 595 70TH STREET 593 740 �,- 2 2 983 T SOUTH DRIVEWAY 338 241 742 �O �cc m DUNBERRYLANE N NOT TO SCALE TUSHIE MONTGOMERY POST-DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES, INC. TRAFFIC STUDY SUNDAY TRIPS TO AND FOR FROM CHURCH CHRIST PRESBYTERIAN 8:00 AM - 12:30 PM WITH BENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES, INC. CHURCH CLOSURE OF 69TH STREET TRANSPORTATIONENGINEERSANDPLANNERS (OPTION 2) Q O cc W C7 �w L L_ 30 T 30 58 RECONSTRUCTED 1 WEST DRIVEWAY RECONSTRUCTED 69TH STREET 172 52 �'►1 30 1 225 --) 58 35 Q CHRIST 799 810 PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH 681 SOUTH 595 DRIVEWAY 70TH STREET 204 593 y k7— 127 683 N NOT TO SCALE TUSHIE MONTGOMERY POST-DEVELOPMENT SUNDAY ASSOCIATES, INC. TRAFFIC STUDY TRIPS TO AND FROM CHURCH FOR 8:00 AM -12:30 PM WITH CHRIST PRESBYTERIAN RECONSTRUCTION OF 69TH ST. lwBENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES, INC. CHURCH AND ACCESS TO 69TH ST. TRANSPORTATION ENO I NEE RS AND PLANNERS (OPTION 3) O O W O O LE T 100 127 t 227 110 RECONSTRUCTED 69TH STREET F - 227 -� 110 RECONSTRUCTED WEST DRIVEWAY CHRIST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH 70TH STREET 593 740 �,- 2 f 2 3616 983 1 T SOUTH 595 DRIVEWAY I 27`1 1 J y lk- 241 742 60 67 2p ko CEO DUNBERRYLANE N NOT TO SCALE POST DEVELOPMENT SUNDAY TUSHIE MONTGOMERY TRAFFIC STUDY TRIPS TO AND FROM CHURCH ASSOCIATES, INC. 8:00 AM -12:30 PM WITH FOR RECONSTRUCTION OF 69TH ST. CHRIST PRESBYTERIAN AND CLOSURE OF ACCESS TO BENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES, INC. CHURCH 69TH ST. TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS (OPTION 4) IFBENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES, INC. TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS 7301 OHMS LANE, SUITE 500 / EDINA, MN 55439 / (612) 832 -9858 / FAX (612) 832 -9564 February 9, 1998 REFER TO FILE: 97 -37 FORECAST POST - DEVELOPMENT SUNDAY DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES ON NEIGHBORHOOD STREETS' Daily Number of Vehicles Anticipated For Each of Four Expansion Options2 ' The post - development forecast traffic volumes for all four options account for phase 1 and phase 2 church expansion. 2 The transportation component of the Metropolitan Council's Regional Blueprint defines 1,000 vehicles per day as the maximum volume threshold for local streets. 24 69th Street Brittany Road Dunberry Lane Existing (1997) 642 509 266 Post - development Option 1 n.a. 510 330 Post - development Option 2 n.a. 170 170 Post - development Option 3 730 560 300 Post - development Option 4 450 390 200 ' The post - development forecast traffic volumes for all four options account for phase 1 and phase 2 church expansion. 2 The transportation component of the Metropolitan Council's Regional Blueprint defines 1,000 vehicles per day as the maximum volume threshold for local streets. 24 IFBENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES, INC. TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERS AND PLANNERS 7301 OHMS LANE, SUITE 500 / EDINA, MN 55439 / (612) 832 -9858 / FAX (612) 832 -9564 February 9, 1998 REFER TO FILE: 97-37 COMPARISON OF PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES ON 70TH STREET EAST OF CHURCH DRIVEWAY Current (1997) weekday p.m. peak hour (5 -6 p.m.) traffic on 70th Street: eastbound = 738 vehicles westbound =1,152 vehicles Current (1997) Sunday a.m. peak hour (10:15 -11:15 a.m.) traffic on 70th Street: eastbound = 385 vehicles westbound = 320 vehicles Post - expansion Sunday a.m. peak hour (9:45 -10:45 a.m.) traffic on 70th Street assuming complete closure of 69th Street and north driveway (option 2), with proposed church schedule B: eastbound = 485 vehicles westbound = 456 vehicles 25 JADJUST VALVE BOXJ --wadeq- ;.. a- hil del al's, C E N E R A L 4 0 1 E S 2. 1 all E.isl adry. mlli teeaq -1. he -thy hfa-Itil- :-. A. he. " .1 lhl. al.. is . 11= I ..I- 1- 3. 3e, Tcom RW� P71r� 01 lh,. Ilted 718197� 11 SAN. 2. Th,jilac V If .0iUs,l 11, Illy, Othl, cohii � it.. I 1. 2 ADJUST TOP OF =NSMUCTION EN�CE at each o6l,, -it N'�ITO 812.5 IANDDT �-1 MNDDT CA-2 -sa"gg, gate. Place �?�ER STATE BONE C� of IS-0002 m he east 6 .2 1. ' " he. I' \S10 E.- g Ot 900 -252 -1166 Ill f I,, laclti 11 NOIt 40 Z111 I . Nim�g my bIll", thNg;'q -y ... 8-c6oh. I" the ah ..he Use i I zS'emp: i, am,, " Phelst.1 h,mgf0t;0, Of 5 ST. S CB the TOP 3. 1111 pleaddese sal lele., ,, t, cattl- If .1-vies ;..p'.1ad. can INV. 863.75 -,tell 0 EILWK MD ROCK SEDIMENT FILTER M III 11tChall Pell III tility sW1 1 OecWQIMI sit. the City f Ed;., ic -swe -0f, I Black and ;licatiah.. .... 4, .1 --re h,-, ire rce (0.5' q.). 6 ST. S. CB -1. P'... w. se .... ...... he Proctor -.To °LR --c --y .,-. _g the I.- C,,.-t Mkf;l h *11 "'t 11 a 1�1"" e (Z710619815"' 1 � 1. 11. 0. .1 the Wack lhl�i.r far. the -k is I TOP - 8660 T-9)F,O, 1. aide 1- 1. IT- 3 1-1 .1 11 "a- d. Me 1. 1 he ac. f- .1hq INV. = 863.0 .ue c, IXTX St.rd P10cI%:..i 11y..h41.t1;' :�.- thla. f, the PI... - .96� The 27' DIAMETER the 1;- 3 felt. Provide ft.snty M wlkf;lll and File , '. m. tin .1 the .1acts. Use I 1. 3 ; eh d;l,�s- ..be. - -'s, At - ... -1 .0 .. -DOT CA -1, A-2, a, CA-, Caches, Agg,ega cm aanamn fed sops, tolde ti,,` tce f" shhh, Too feet W ths- ...... loo a.- .1 8• �iol to I.- -eight f 16'. ADJUST VALVE BOXI 6. halify he E.gi,heer at ., ei .... Pit .. q__ .11 saws .6-'s thiae opesm'" pch- Re he. as .0y ei II, I;- If he ached S T O R Y S E It E R N 0 T E S Oy sh-mg ST,- scal is I", efts' Bedi-t he. ... hi,- y Or 7 T. S. CS I Unless Otl,�,s hdillted. .11 4 ft. dil-s, (a.d.) ah- liesel TOP 868.5 r,;.fteced a. Oil teaser -tchaegi- 6. IlaCe a 15• thick 1,M at MNOOT Sehal- Sescificati- INV, = 862.7 2. Usel a Neh- R-1733 f- - Type -C- ,d;,l grate, a, 3 S601.2A C Ill 0 a 7.5' hiCi, 'O,r .1 Ill atia,,Nced .1, .11 rn I-da. Spehiilicat; 3601.2.11 q, at all- helical. .,, the .- i. sKh .1i Use, Neenah R-M67-OR/DL 1-:19 ith - We. w St. rd Stitheil-lia- 2511. Ceti filter --ml -y W .'a'aheal .1. C.- P .' C 11 f- 1 9--, Wle, -ter;W. 1-11 i as shashe _ MNDOT St-dard! Pill, Me 31438 . 01' f St1?dIhd Pill, NO 260 fall, pies iha;c,ttep. J. 11.1 1" 4" - stectia" 'I ca G,y,;polo Rcp ste- I,d, as at sith , ; W ts, CGIOW le %_fIte,ch; per st i"'. . "; *_ '1114, the, 12' c• l-teh. I. ;- mi. Z.0 -1 cali 10 all" ., he deeh M .=ty If 'ia"D am f; - sh." as no I- then pas let. 1":.. g I.,n se., a, r hpas. seco- far .1 ace Ile, 1- 12• h aemela. 7. 'el I hasid, Coht,N _eIie in a..,-_ •j,I, he 1. Ri f-, i- he 'Rims. ' c-'.- '. the 0.0-0 m the thill -age- PIOCliCal, h-da- W .1 the St-d- Sadhilie.11... lar R.;nf-.a at.,; IN 0' G-4, i, u'al ..Olmhca py I.. T 879 Concrete S.- Pipe, ASTM Enig-ti- C16 Deep C .;v, nded,17P.11.1ion �.l 976.5/ ci_l." f: the -se .1 .;- it-44d. Un'..... einforcip �falc d c-c- sass, Dive aft a. ="t '11 t-di secii-teVe, addl 1, ft hpOa as s hI r ... Qy .g. as. ft., he 11. sacti- 'i,el Ft- ... lihs. x '0 _'hq as ,heram C... lath.m-li... T T ST. S. CB 1-65T B 878 S.Ill 16.t 7..5, Rate Me. =6F. me gas", as 9. Conn- a ropoam ewnbce, Ah g-- hot sese-i't, -,:ectial �cr, , vidd ja shah - ocis 5 3:1 (3 heAel 1. 1 -i). Tr c,, I I.0 'g E R 0 S 1 0 N C G N t R 0 L 1 0 1 E S STORMNIATER MANAGEMENT MEA 1. el 11 sit f-c, at the laclso., %7� the plan p,;,, to Talle re-1,,, D,6g, Mn . 7.09 ds 0.01108 m:2 esi 01 e, 7t feet . - laci .1 1 test , is :,a" "assn feel i". he 5esq, Stehh, - S�. 24-h,, Type 1: gr ... d Akh. .11 ie , t-0 (at least 5 -1 he 6 ;n we) ..g - he ias .1 100-I'F1 .1.9t, ftmr L- - 953.14 e .e.aaehl - L" the I-ic in the ..I - .00:M U� Stahsg, VIA- UtR;,,d 0.21 7 ft. fill and %cl. ft" ., ;1 the Icali. .1 . '00-M Pecil-DeNed.a.-e D;..elge ftrl,; - 23.10 cl. 1.- -1. se-ti. 'he f-I 11 least 6 ches. 100 Y;I Phe-0-aishheht 0;=W" 05 d.' T 876 eves . .1 -. - =.r." 1; t the .- -1. Sit a 873 .."l -I as 2 - ...'s � .,., he-. lh... a, -..are T- .• u- lion e. eval T- / 10, u-sel tell "It, 11 neigh met ses than 1.0 ill he, 1-1. Past. s- '_ a ;_ engtn al 30 inchn ue..l death 1.ar;, ll he ;-u *[c_'D0T.S Sr...."!i.h "" Ty- 3. TOP 8 1 L_u INV. 8565:851 _j t, h,� 'Plices. F9T_ST S CB < 12"0 P V C ST. S. OFF SITE PONDING DETAIL lW7= 842,321 INV. 854.24 0 5% 1131 ST. S. CEI 114 ------ ST. S. CB "M ECT TO EXIST CONNECT co 27 7.1 ST. S� CATCH BASIN CHRIST INV 841.0 2 ICY_ r FLOOR 8 9 �v 7! , -C. Of 6 -r,,- CONSTRUCT NEW ST. NON Ad %,A t r ,r- S-- Ec- MO EXISTING 36- OR IST M SEWER 1 TOP vd 84 84 N < XISTI;T�p� � I TOP 1355.0 ---------- _e -856 7 852 . . 12 �FE !73 7. ...... INV. 1191 ST. S. CEI RELOCATE P.I.V. EON -3 x TOP 1159-0 tNV. 856.0 20 ST- S. C9 AOIUSTS.TOP - M"Tv all , S0F.H NEW TOP 852.5 FIRM (1 8,67 8 fie JADJUST VALVE BOXJ --wadeq- ;.. a- hil del al's, C E N E R A L 4 0 1 E S 2. 1 all E.isl adry. mlli teeaq -1. he -thy hfa-Itil- :-. A. he. " .1 lhl. al.. is . 11= I ..I- 1- 3. 3e, Tcom RW� P71r� 01 lh,. Ilted 718197� 11 SAN. 2. Th,jilac V If .0iUs,l 11, Illy, Othl, cohii � it.. I 1. 2 ADJUST TOP OF =NSMUCTION EN�CE at each o6l,, -it N'�ITO 812.5 IANDDT �-1 MNDDT CA-2 -sa"gg, gate. Place �?�ER STATE BONE C� of IS-0002 m he east 6 .2 1. ' " he. I' \S10 E.- g Ot 900 -252 -1166 Ill f I,, laclti 11 NOIt 40 Z111 I . Nim�g my bIll", thNg;'q -y ... 8-c6oh. I" the ah ..he Use i I zS'emp: i, am,, " Phelst.1 h,mgf0t;0, Of 5 ST. S CB the TOP 3. 1111 pleaddese sal lele., ,, t, cattl- If .1-vies ;..p'.1ad. can INV. 863.75 -,tell 0 EILWK MD ROCK SEDIMENT FILTER M III 11tChall Pell III tility sW1 1 OecWQIMI sit. the City f Ed;., ic -swe -0f, I Black and ;licatiah.. .... 4, .1 --re h,-, ire rce (0.5' q.). 6 ST. S. CB -1. P'... w. se .... ...... he Proctor -.To °LR --c --y .,-. _g the I.- C,,.-t Mkf;l h *11 "'t 11 a 1�1"" e (Z710619815"' 1 � 1. 11. 0. .1 the Wack lhl�i.r far. the -k is I TOP - 8660 T-9)F,O, 1. aide 1- 1. IT- 3 1-1 .1 11 "a- d. Me 1. 1 he ac. f- .1hq INV. = 863.0 .ue c, IXTX St.rd P10cI%:..i 11y..h41.t1;' :�.- thla. f, the PI... - .96� The 27' DIAMETER the 1;- 3 felt. Provide ft.snty M wlkf;lll and File , '. m. tin .1 the .1acts. Use I 1. 3 ; eh d;l,�s- ..be. - -'s, At - ... -1 .0 .. -DOT CA -1, A-2, a, CA-, Caches, Agg,ega cm aanamn fed sops, tolde ti,,` tce f" shhh, Too feet W ths- ...... loo a.- .1 8• �iol to I.- -eight f 16'. ADJUST VALVE BOXI 6. halify he E.gi,heer at ., ei .... Pit .. q__ .11 saws .6-'s thiae opesm'" pch- Re he. as .0y ei II, I;- If he ached S T O R Y S E It E R N 0 T E S Oy sh-mg ST,- scal is I", efts' Bedi-t he. ... hi,- y Or 7 T. S. CS I Unless Otl,�,s hdillted. .11 4 ft. dil-s, (a.d.) ah- liesel TOP 868.5 r,;.fteced a. Oil teaser -tchaegi- 6. IlaCe a 15• thick 1,M at MNOOT Sehal- Sescificati- INV, = 862.7 2. Usel a Neh- R-1733 f- - Type -C- ,d;,l grate, a, 3 S601.2A C Ill 0 a 7.5' hiCi, 'O,r .1 Ill atia,,Nced .1, .11 rn I-da. Spehiilicat; 3601.2.11 q, at all- helical. .,, the .- i. sKh .1i Use, Neenah R-M67-OR/DL 1-:19 ith - We. w St. rd Stitheil-lia- 2511. Ceti filter --ml -y W .'a'aheal .1. C.- P .' C 11 f- 1 9--, Wle, -ter;W. 1-11 i as shashe _ MNDOT St-dard! Pill, Me 31438 . 01' f St1?dIhd Pill, NO 260 fall, pies iha;c,ttep. J. 11.1 1" 4" - stectia" 'I ca G,y,;polo Rcp ste- I,d, as at sith , ; W ts, CGIOW le %_fIte,ch; per st i"'. . "; *_ '1114, the, 12' c• l-teh. I. ;- mi. Z.0 -1 cali 10 all" ., he deeh M .=ty If 'ia"D am f; - sh." as no I- then pas let. 1":.. g I.,n se., a, r hpas. seco- far .1 ace Ile, 1- 12• h aemela. 7. 'el I hasid, Coht,N _eIie in a..,-_ •j,I, he 1. Ri f-, i- he 'Rims. ' c-'.- '. the 0.0-0 m the thill -age- PIOCliCal, h-da- W .1 the St-d- Sadhilie.11... lar R.;nf-.a at.,; IN 0' G-4, i, u'al ..Olmhca py I.. T 879 Concrete S.- Pipe, ASTM Enig-ti- C16 Deep C .;v, nded,17P.11.1ion �.l 976.5/ ci_l." f: the -se .1 .;- it-44d. Un'..... einforcip �falc d c-c- sass, Dive aft a. ="t '11 t-di secii-teVe, addl 1, ft hpOa as s hI r ... Qy .g. as. ft., he 11. sacti- 'i,el Ft- ... lihs. x '0 _'hq as ,heram C... lath.m-li... T T ST. S. CB 1-65T B 878 S.Ill 16.t 7..5, Rate Me. =6F. me gas", as 9. Conn- a ropoam ewnbce, Ah g-- hot sese-i't, -,:ectial �cr, , vidd ja shah - ocis 5 3:1 (3 heAel 1. 1 -i). Tr c,, I I.0 'g E R 0 S 1 0 N C G N t R 0 L 1 0 1 E S STORMNIATER MANAGEMENT MEA 1. el 11 sit f-c, at the laclso., %7� the plan p,;,, to Talle re-1,,, D,6g, Mn . 7.09 ds 0.01108 m:2 esi 01 e, 7t feet . - laci .1 1 test , is :,a" "assn feel i". he 5esq, Stehh, - S�. 24-h,, Type 1: gr ... d Akh. .11 ie , t-0 (at least 5 -1 he 6 ;n we) ..g - he ias .1 100-I'F1 .1.9t, ftmr L- - 953.14 e .e.aaehl - L" the I-ic in the ..I - .00:M U� Stahsg, VIA- UtR;,,d 0.21 7 ft. fill and %cl. ft" ., ;1 the Icali. .1 . '00-M Pecil-DeNed.a.-e D;..elge ftrl,; - 23.10 cl. 1.- -1. se-ti. 'he f-I 11 least 6 ches. 100 Y;I Phe-0-aishheht 0;=W" 05 d.' T 876 eves . .1 -. - =.r." 1; t the .- -1. Sit a 873 .."l -I as 2 - ...'s � .,., he-. lh... a, -..are T- .• u- lion e. eval T- / 10, u-sel tell "It, 11 neigh met ses than 1.0 ill he, 1-1. Past. s- '_ a ;_ engtn al 30 inchn ue..l death 1.ar;, ll he ;-u *[c_'D0T.S Sr...."!i.h "" Ty- 3. TOP 8 1 L_u INV. 8565:851 _j t, h,� 'Plices. F9T_ST S CB < 12"0 P V C ST. S. OFF SITE PONDING DETAIL lW7= 842,321 INV. 854.24 0 5% 1131 ST. S. CEI 114 ------ ST. S. CB "M ECT TO EXIST CONNECT co 27 7.1 ST. S� CATCH BASIN CHRIST INV 841.0 2 ICY_ FLOOR 8 9 �v 7! , -C. Of 6 -r,,- CONSTRUCT NEW ST. NON Ad %,A t r ,r- S-- Ec- MO EXISTING 36- OR IST M SEWER 1 TOP vd 84 84 N < XISTI;T�p� � I TOP 1355.0 ---------- _e -856 7 852 . . 12 �FE !73 7. ...... INV. 1191 ST. S. CEI RELOCATE P.I.V. EON -3 x TOP 1159-0 tNV. 856.0 20 ST- S. C9 JADJUST VALVE BOXJ --wadeq- ;.. a- hil del al's, C E N E R A L 4 0 1 E S 2. 1 all E.isl adry. mlli teeaq -1. he -thy hfa-Itil- :-. A. he. " .1 lhl. al.. is . 11= I ..I- 1- 3. 3e, Tcom RW� P71r� 01 lh,. Ilted 718197� 11 SAN. 2. Th,jilac V If .0iUs,l 11, Illy, Othl, cohii � it.. I 1. 2 ADJUST TOP OF =NSMUCTION EN�CE at each o6l,, -it N'�ITO 812.5 IANDDT �-1 MNDDT CA-2 -sa"gg, gate. Place �?�ER STATE BONE C� of IS-0002 m he east 6 .2 1. ' " he. I' \S10 E.- g Ot 900 -252 -1166 Ill f I,, laclti 11 NOIt 40 Z111 I . Nim�g my bIll", thNg;'q -y ... 8-c6oh. I" the ah ..he Use i I zS'emp: i, am,, " Phelst.1 h,mgf0t;0, Of 5 ST. S CB the TOP 3. 1111 pleaddese sal lele., ,, t, cattl- If .1-vies ;..p'.1ad. can INV. 863.75 -,tell 0 EILWK MD ROCK SEDIMENT FILTER M III 11tChall Pell III tility sW1 1 OecWQIMI sit. the City f Ed;., ic -swe -0f, I Black and ;licatiah.. .... 4, .1 --re h,-, ire rce (0.5' q.). 6 ST. S. CB -1. P'... w. se .... ...... he Proctor -.To °LR --c --y .,-. _g the I.- C,,.-t Mkf;l h *11 "'t 11 a 1�1"" e (Z710619815"' 1 � 1. 11. 0. .1 the Wack lhl�i.r far. the -k is I TOP - 8660 T-9)F,O, 1. aide 1- 1. IT- 3 1-1 .1 11 "a- d. Me 1. 1 he ac. f- .1hq INV. = 863.0 .ue c, IXTX St.rd P10cI%:..i 11y..h41.t1;' :�.- thla. f, the PI... - .96� The 27' DIAMETER the 1;- 3 felt. Provide ft.snty M wlkf;lll and File , '. m. tin .1 the .1acts. Use I 1. 3 ; eh d;l,�s- ..be. - -'s, At - ... -1 .0 .. -DOT CA -1, A-2, a, CA-, Caches, Agg,ega cm aanamn fed sops, tolde ti,,` tce f" shhh, Too feet W ths- ...... loo a.- .1 8• �iol to I.- -eight f 16'. ADJUST VALVE BOXI 6. halify he E.gi,heer at ., ei .... Pit .. q__ .11 saws .6-'s thiae opesm'" pch- Re he. as .0y ei II, I;- If he ached S T O R Y S E It E R N 0 T E S Oy sh-mg ST,- scal is I", efts' Bedi-t he. ... hi,- y Or 7 T. S. CS I Unless Otl,�,s hdillted. .11 4 ft. dil-s, (a.d.) ah- liesel TOP 868.5 r,;.fteced a. Oil teaser -tchaegi- 6. IlaCe a 15• thick 1,M at MNOOT Sehal- Sescificati- INV, = 862.7 2. Usel a Neh- R-1733 f- - Type -C- ,d;,l grate, a, 3 S601.2A C Ill 0 a 7.5' hiCi, 'O,r .1 Ill atia,,Nced .1, .11 rn I-da. Spehiilicat; 3601.2.11 q, at all- helical. .,, the .- i. sKh .1i Use, Neenah R-M67-OR/DL 1-:19 ith - We. w St. rd Stitheil-lia- 2511. Ceti filter --ml -y W .'a'aheal .1. C.- P .' C 11 f- 1 9--, Wle, -ter;W. 1-11 i as shashe _ MNDOT St-dard! Pill, Me 31438 . 01' f St1?dIhd Pill, NO 260 fall, pies iha;c,ttep. J. 11.1 1" 4" - stectia" 'I ca G,y,;polo Rcp ste- I,d, as at sith , ; W ts, CGIOW le %_fIte,ch; per st i"'. . "; *_ '1114, the, 12' c• l-teh. I. ;- mi. Z.0 -1 cali 10 all" ., he deeh M .=ty If 'ia"D am f; - sh." as no I- then pas let. 1":.. g I.,n se., a, r hpas. seco- far .1 ace Ile, 1- 12• h aemela. 7. 'el I hasid, Coht,N _eIie in a..,-_ •j,I, he 1. Ri f-, i- he 'Rims. ' c-'.- '. the 0.0-0 m the thill -age- PIOCliCal, h-da- W .1 the St-d- Sadhilie.11... lar R.;nf-.a at.,; IN 0' G-4, i, u'al ..Olmhca py I.. T 879 Concrete S.- Pipe, ASTM Enig-ti- C16 Deep C .;v, nded,17P.11.1ion �.l 976.5/ ci_l." f: the -se .1 .;- it-44d. Un'..... einforcip �falc d c-c- sass, Dive aft a. ="t '11 t-di secii-teVe, addl 1, ft hpOa as s hI r ... Qy .g. as. ft., he 11. sacti- 'i,el Ft- ... lihs. x '0 _'hq as ,heram C... lath.m-li... T T ST. S. CB 1-65T B 878 S.Ill 16.t 7..5, Rate Me. =6F. me gas", as 9. Conn- a ropoam ewnbce, Ah g-- hot sese-i't, -,:ectial �cr, , vidd ja shah - ocis 5 3:1 (3 heAel 1. 1 -i). Tr c,, I I.0 'g E R 0 S 1 0 N C G N t R 0 L 1 0 1 E S STORMNIATER MANAGEMENT MEA 1. el 11 sit f-c, at the laclso., %7� the plan p,;,, to Talle re-1,,, D,6g, Mn . 7.09 ds 0.01108 m:2 esi 01 e, 7t feet . - laci .1 1 test , is :,a" "assn feel i". he 5esq, Stehh, - S�. 24-h,, Type 1: gr ... d Akh. .11 ie , t-0 (at least 5 -1 he 6 ;n we) ..g - he ias .1 100-I'F1 .1.9t, ftmr L- - 953.14 e .e.aaehl - L" the I-ic in the ..I - .00:M U� Stahsg, VIA- UtR;,,d 0.21 7 ft. fill and %cl. ft" ., ;1 the Icali. .1 . '00-M Pecil-DeNed.a.-e D;..elge ftrl,; - 23.10 cl. 1.- -1. se-ti. 'he f-I 11 least 6 ches. 100 Y;I Phe-0-aishheht 0;=W" 05 d.' T 876 eves . .1 -. - =.r." 1; t the .- -1. Sit a 873 .."l -I as 2 - ...'s � .,., he-. lh... a, -..are T- .• u- lion e. eval T- / 10, u-sel tell "It, 11 neigh met ses than 1.0 ill he, 1-1. Past. s- '_ a ;_ engtn al 30 inchn ue..l death 1.ar;, ll he ;-u *[c_'D0T.S Sr...."!i.h "" Ty- 3. TOP 8 1 L_u INV. 8565:851 _j t, h,� 'Plices. F9T_ST S CB < 12"0 P V C ST. S. OFF SITE PONDING DETAIL lW7= 842,321 INV. 854.24 0 5% 1131 ST. S. CEI 114 ------ ST. S. CB "M ECT TO EXIST CONNECT 27 7.1 ST. S� CATCH BASIN CHRIST INV 841.0 2 ICY_ �v 7! , -C. Of 6 -r,,- CONSTRUCT NEW ST. NON Ad %,A t r ,r- S-- Ec- MO EXISTING 36- OR IST M SEWER 1 TOP vd 84 84 N < I TOP 1355.0 ---------- _e -856 7 852 . . INV. 1191 ST. S. CEI EON TOP 1159-0 tNV. 856.0 AOIUSTS.TOP S0F.H NEW TOP 852.5 (1 8,67 8 fie -77.7 7 862 .2z TOO YR. EAK I.L'E'VATION HIGH WATPR (T 952.5 los s- I I 9 8-6.2 oN INV. 849.75 [ 0 0 IV Ny o -Z Top -8455 OFF SITE PONDING DETAIL lW7= 842,321 7- 1131 ST. S. CEI 114 ------ ST. S. CB '57P.V.C. ST $ ECT TO EXIST CONNECT 27 7.1 ST. S� CATCH BASIN CHRIST INV 841.0 2 7! , -C. Of 6 -r,,- CONSTRUCT NEW ST. NON S. 1151 ST. S. MH %,A t r ,r- S-- Ec- MO EXISTING 36- OR IST M SEWER 1 TOP vd 84 84 N < ---------- _e -856 7 852 G �1 o e U) 0 � �NCbHroB I!�f'� RESOLUTION WHEREAS the following described tracts of land constitute separate parcels: City of llla PARCEL A: Lot 7, Block 1, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 2 "d Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. And PARCEL B: Lot 8, Block 1, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 2ND Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the owners of the above tracts of land desire to divide said tracts into the following described separate parcels: PARCEL A: Lot 8, Block 1, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 2ND ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota, according to the recorded plot thereof and That part of Lot 7, Block 1, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 2ND ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota, according to the recorded plat thereof, lying westerly of a line drawn from a point on the northerly line of said Lot 7, distant 11.00 feet southeasterly from the most northerly corner of said Lot 7, thence southwesterly to the most westerly corner of said Lot 7, and PARCEL B: Lot 7, Block 1, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 2ND ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota, according to the recorded plat thereof, except that part of said Lot 7, lying westerly of a line drawn from a point on the northern line of said Lot 7, distant 11.00 feet southeasterly from the most northerly corner of said Lot 7, thence southwesterly to the most westerly corner of said Lot 7. WHEREAS, it has been determined that compliance with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina will create an unnecessary hardship and said Parcels as separate tracts of land do not interfere with the purpose of-the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the City of Edina Code Section 810 and 850. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina that the conveyance and ownership of said Parcels as separate tracts of land is hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Code Section 810 and Code Section 850 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but are not waived for any other purpose or as to any other provision thereof, and subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent ordinances of the City of Edina or with the prior approval of this Council as may be provided for by those ordinances. ADOPTED this 4"' day of May, 1998. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) . CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of May 4, 1998, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City of Edina, this May 5, 1998. City Clerk City Hall (612) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 927 -7645 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 927 -5461 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY HELD AT CITY HALL APRIL 20, 1998 - 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold and Chair Smith. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Maetzold and seconded by Commissioner Hovland to approve and adopt the HRA Consent Agenda items as presented with the exception of HRA Minutes of April 6, 1998. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold, Smith Motion carried. MINUTES OF THE HRA MEETING OF APRIL 6. 1998. APPROVED AS CORRECTED Commissioner Faust asked the HRA Meeting Minutes of April 6, 1998, be removed from the Consent Agenda requesting a sentence in her comments be stricken. Motion made by Commissioner Faust and seconded by Commissioner Hovland approving the Minutes of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority of April 6, 1998, as corrected. Commissioner Maetzold seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold, Smith Motion carried. WMEP PROPOSAL UPDATE GIVEN Executive Director Hughes reminded Council at the April 6, 1998, meeting, staff provided the HRA with an update concerning the WMEP proposal. Since that meeting, the Legislature has acted on the bonding bill. In its final form, this bill allocated $2 million for this school rather than the $13.2 million, which had been requested. The apparent logic for the $2 million allocation was to complete site purchase and to undertake planning studies. The Legislature would apparently then consider funding for the building during the 2000 Legislative Session. Staff met with School District staff to discuss the effect of the Legislation on the School District's proposal for the Kunz Oil /Lewis Engineering properties. The School District staff states that the District remains interested in using the Legislative allocation to purchase the subject property for later development when and if the school were funded. They also note that they may be interested in pursuing other locations in the City. Director Hughes said based upon this response from the School District, it is the belief that the HRA needs to discuss alternatives for the Kunz Oil /Lewis Engineering 1 properties. It may be advisable to again conduct a joint meeting with the Board of Education for further discussions. Commissioner Kelly asked with $2 million already acquisitioned, when would funding for construction be available. Director Hughes explained money for construction should be available after the next Legislative Session. It would not be in the best interest of the City to sell the land to the School District without legal assurance they could not re -sell the property. If the land were sold to the School District a reverter clause could be made a condition of the sale. Commissioner Maetzold asked if the $2 million was all the funds that are available. Director Hughes said $1.8 million from last years session and $2 million from this session or a total available of $3.8 million. Commissioner Maetzold inquired if the School District were considering other sites in Edina. Director Hughes said the Grace Church site and the Morningside School properties were being considered but the Kunz Oil /Lewis Engineering site was their 'rst choice. Commissioner Maetzold asked if there was a time limit on the land purchase. Director Hughes explained the Council is in a position to say no to the School District's land purchase knowing they would let the site sit for two years until funding is acquired to begin construction. He suggested the Council move on with proposals on the property. Commissioner Hovland said the School District should be treated the same as any developer. We would never wait for two years for a developer to compete their development. He did not believe a joint meeting with the School District would be of any benefit. He further suggested the site be used both as residential and commercial and not to forget the need for a senior center. Commissioner Maetzold stated his disappointment with the lack of financing from the Legislature but development of the property should not be delayed. Use of the property offers exciting possibilities for either commercial or public uses. Commissioner Faust said the School Board has yet to answer questions asked of them and believes any meeting would be counterproductive until these answers are forthcoming. Commissioner Kelly indicated he sees no reason for the Council to meet with the School Board. Chair Smith pointed out if the proposed school were for Edina residents, the HRA would follow the long tradition of cooperation with the School Board to acquire a site. The proposed school is a regional school and staff should move forward with proposals on the public and private use of the site. Commissioner Kelly requested staff to examine whether acquisition of tangential properties to the site is possible. i Chair Smith asked if, 1) a timeline could be established for the development of the property, 2) if public use of the site could be studied, 3) if additional land could be acquired, and 4) if solutions could be found for traffic. Director Hughes acknowledged he could have a report back to the HRA by the May 18, 1998, regular meeting. Commissioner Faust made a motion directing staff to report back to the HRA at the May 18, 1998, regular- meeting with alternatives for the Kunz Oil /Lewis Engineering site, to cover 1) a timeline for property development, 2) a study of public use of the land, 3) possible acquisition of tangential land, and 4) traffic solutions. Commissioner Maetzold seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold, Smith Motion carried. *CHANGE ORDER FOR CENTENNIAL LAKES SOUTH POND MASS GRADING (CONTRACT 97 -2) APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Maetzold and seconded by Commissioner Hovland approving the Change Order for Centennial Lakes South Pond Mass Grading (Contract 97 -2) on Building 4 to McCrossan at $13,500.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. CLAIMS PAID Commissioner Hovland made a motion for payment of the HRA Claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated April 15, 1998, and consisting of one page totaling $28,937.47. Commissioner Maetzold seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold, Smith Motion carried. There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, Chair Smith declared the meeting adjourned. 3 Executive Director COUNCIL Ch- --: REGISTER 2: —PR -1998 (18:48) page 1' CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION. INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 13298 -------------------------------------------- 05/04/98 - ------------------------------------------------------------------------- $85.00 BRAUN INTERTEC Envior fee 101014 -- - - - . -; GRANDVIEW PRO FEE ARCH /E < * >. $85.00* 13299 05%04/98 $4,214.66 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP Legal fees 610491 CENTENNIAL LAK PRO FEES LEG /S < *> $4,214.66* $4,299.66* MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE, EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL APRIL 20,1998 - 7:00 P.M. - ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold and Mayor Smith. f CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Maetzold and seconded by Member Hovland to approve and adopt the Consent Agenda' as presented with the exception of Agenda Item III.A: Set Public Hearing Date (5/4/98) Conditional Use Permit, Christ Presbyterian Church Expansion. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold, Smith Motion carried. APRIL 24, 1998 PROCLAIMED AS ARBOR DAY Mayor Smith proclaimed April 23, 1998, as Arbor Day in the City of Edina. In 1872, J. Sterling Morton of Nebraska, proposed a special day be set aside for the planting of trees. Arbor Day is now observed throughout the nation and the world. Trees are a valuable resource, purifying air, conserving soil and energy, providing wildlife habitat, and enriching our lives in important ways. Mayor Smith called upon the citizens of Edina to plant trees now for pleasure and for the pleasure of future generations. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 6, 1998, SPECIAL MEETING OF APRIL 6, AND BOARD OF REVIEW MINUTES OF APRIL 13, 1998, APPROVED Motion made by Member Maetzold and seconded by Member Hovland approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of April 6, 1998, Special Meeting of April 6, 1998, and Board of Review Minutes of April 13,1998. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED CONCRETE SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENT NO S -75 (MAPLE ROAD) UNTIL TUNE 1, 1998 Affidavits of Notice. were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Engineer's Presentation Engineer Hoffman explained the City received a petition from residents requesting sidewalks on Maple Road June 6, 1997. Engineer Hoffman noted the considerations for this project included: traffic issues related to the street being the southerly access to the neighborhood for 130 homes, cut through traffic from the nearby freeway, and traffic avoiding 501h Street. In addition, Maple Road is lined with mature trees and has over 55 children from newborn to 17 years old living in the neighborhood. Neighborhood traffic counts conducted' between April 9 and April 15, 1998 indicated 650 to 998 car trips per day for the 4900 block of Maple Road and 367 to 635 car trips per day for the 4800 block of Maple Road. Research has indicated that residents become uncomfortable with safety issues when trips are between 500 and 1,000 per day. Engineer Hoffman added that staff felt the volume of traffic along Maple Road justifies separating pedestrian and vehicular traffic. Page 1 Minutes/Edina Ci!yCouncil/Apri120,1998 Member Maetzold pointed out that any traffic restrictions would apply to neighborhood residents as well as cut through traffic. Member Faust asked if Maple Road traffic has increased significantly more than other City streets. Engineer Hoffman replied that traffic counts conducted between April 9 and 15, 1998, indicated the car trips per day were between 367 at the low end and 998 at the high end. Member Hovland asked if there could be coordination of traffic lights at Halifax and France Avenues. Engineer Hoffman replied this coordination would be part of the project. Engineer Hoffman introduced Assistant Engineer Houle. Assistant Engineer Houle noted that staff hosted an informational meeting in January of 1998, and conducted a survey of residents. The neighborhood also formed an ad hoc committee that requested the public hearing be deferred for oche month. Assistant Engineer Houle noted that many residents had corresponded with the City to indicate their position on the proposed sidewalk. He reported the following survey results: Do sidewalks increase safety ?: 18 yes 15 no Do you support sidewalks ?: 13 yes 22 no . Adjacent to roadway 8 yes 24 no Along property line 9 yes 25 no Assistant Engineer Houle stated staff would propose construction of five foot sidewalks on both sides of Maple Road. The sidewalks would be installed at the property line and meander in alignment to avoid the trees. He presented graphics depicting the neighborhood today and with sidewalks added. The total cost of the sidewalk improvement is estimated at $79,600 and proposed to be assessed on a per lot basis at $2,000 per assessable lot. Back yards and side yards would be assessed at one third of the $2,000 per lot rate. Member Hovland asked if there has been any flooding on Maple Road. Assistant Engineer Houle noted there is a low spot near 4900 Maple Road. Engineer Hoffman added any storm sewer would be paid for out of the Utility Fund. Mayor Smith opened the hearing for public comment. Public Comment Edward Claire, 4825 Maple Road stated he was against the sidewalk. Mr. Claire voiced his desire to have the trees left unharmed. He also noted there are drainage issue_ s in the 4800 block of Maple and adding sidewalk will exacerbate these problems. Mike Stolee, 4824 Maple Road, said he appreciated the opportunity to learn how, the petition process worked. However, Mr. Stolee felt sidewalk would be too intrusive and dangerous to the trees on Maple Street. It would bring the public fifteen feet closer to his living room window and it is also too expensive. Mr. Stolee stated that according to his survey, 68.9% of the residents of Maple Road oppose the proposed installation of sidewalks. He added that his surveys are, in his opinion, a petition not to install sidewalk. Mr. Stolee also questioned the legality of the notice because the published notice stated the estimated project cost to be $79,600, but the mailed notice stated the estimated cost to be $29,000. Mr. Stolee presented completed resident surveys from the ad hoc committee to be placed on file. Page 2 Minutes/Edina Q!yCounci1/ARril20,1998 Henry Barksdale, 4801 Maple Road, stated he initially signed the petition circulated on Maple Road because of concern over safety of children. He said this was a common urban community asking for a common urban solution to a problem. Installation of sidewalks could help neighborhood immediately. The 55 children in the neighborhood are his main concern. Mr. Barksdale indicated he would trust engineers to take necessary precautions to save the Maple Road trees. Barbara Tubman, 4900 Maple Road, observed she had lived on Maple Road since 1981 and raised three children. Ms. Tubman noted there has always been a large number of children on Maple Road. She stated, that in her opinion it is the parents' responsibility to safeguard their children. When Ms. Tubman bought her, home she knew there were no sidewalks. She does not want to lose the trees and landscaping. Ms. Tubman urged the Council to address the safety concern in some other way. Charlene Witherell, 4932 Maple Road, said she would not mind having left hand turns prohibited on Maple Road. Ms. Witherell stated that she had no idea until January of 1998 that in June of 1997, neighborhood residents had circulated a petition. Ms. Witherell said she had been a resident for eighteen years and traffic has always been an issue, although it has increased. She bought her house knowing there was no sidewalks and believes other issues need investigation before sidewalks are installed. Chris Elliot, 4701 West 481h Street, noted he had been a resident since 1983. He said when he moved in there were no young children, but now there are a number of young children. He has three children, ages three, seven and ten. Mr. Elliot stated he felt it important for the Council to know that 88% of the Maple Road residents agree there is a safety issue. Residents also agree the safety of children is an issue. Mr. Elliot felt $250/ year was an insignificant cost compared to the safety of a child. He added that sound public policy should take care for the greater good. Mr. Elliot believed the potential for damage to the trees or that sidewalks would reduce home values was inconclusive. He stated the demographics of traffic are causing the problems and must be dealt with soon. Installation of sidewalks appeared to be the only prudent approach with immediate benefit. Mr. Elliot expressed concern with making public policy decisions based on aesthetics. Instead there must be a balance of inherent risk versus benefit. He suggested the Council would be responsible if they vote down the sidewalks and a child is injured. Jon Andersen, 4804 Maple Road, stated he bought his home because he liked the look of the street. Mr. Andersen objected to loosing a portion of his front yard and the potential loss of trees. Mary Wyffels, 4920 Maple Road, noted that the Engineering Department's survey and that of the ad hoc committee found the majority of the residents are opposed to the sidewalks. For this reason, Ms. Wyffels urged the Council not to install sidewalks on Maple Road. Larry Eastmen, 4928 Maple Road, stated he believed residents opposing the sidewalks were doing so because of the cost, a material issue. He felt the issue is not a cost issue, but rather a safety issue. Sidewalks would make the neighborhood a safer place. Mike Martin, 4905 Maple Road, stated it is parents' responsibility to take necessary steps to restrict children's access to the street in order to keep them safe. Parents and not the City should bear the burden of safety. Installing sidewalks will not ensure neighborhood safety. Page 3 Minutes/Edina QyCouncil/April20,1998 Kathleen Godfrey, West 491h Street, stated the safety of children is not the only issue. Ms. Godfrey stated all pedestrians are at risk on Maple Road. She added there is no place to walk, and reminded that after a certain age it is unrealistic to think parents can control where their children walk. Ms. Godfrey urged the Council to install the sidewalks. Tom Becker, 4828 Maple Road, stated he favored the installation of sidewalks. He wanted a safe environment for all pedestrians. He agreed the sidewalks are a safety issue, unlike the aesthetic issue of the trees. Mr. Becker added that trees are only pruned at certain times and he trusted the staff to be the least disruptive to the trees as possible. Traffic has increased dramatically on Maple Road. Mr. Becker said he did not realize how busy Maple Road was when he bought his home. He supported the installation of the sidewalks. Lisa Holmberg, 4811 Maple Road, said one of the benefits of living in Edina is the "Village" feel. She pointed out the "Growing Small" concept would be increased by installing sidewalks because it would further the "small town" neighborhood experience. Ms. Holmberg urged the Council to consider sidewalks for more than just Maple Road, because in her opinion, this is a bigger issue than just one neighborhood. Council Discussion: Mayor Smith noted staff had followed current public policy which waits to install sidewalks until they are requested. When residents want sidewalks they obtain a petition which is what took place with the Maple Road residents. Staff then looks at the request on a larger scope: for instance, the need for curb, gutter, storm sewer, etc., then makes a recommendation based upon their analysis. The City has had a policy that when sidewalks are installed based upon a petition from the majority of the residents, the residents ' are assessed the cost. He acknowledged residents' concern that they were unaware a petition had been received in June of 1997 until January 1998, noting the process will be reviewed. The Council may decide upon a different policy regarding the installation of sidewalk. Mayor Smith took issue with residents saying if sidewalks are not installed and an accident happens responsibility is the Councils. He stated he would feel bad if anyone was hurt, but stated that responsibility rests with the circumstances of the incident, not decisions of public policy. Member Faust observed the proposed sidewalk has generated a great deal of mail. She noted there are many issues to consider on Maple Road: preservation of mature trees, the proximity of the proposed sidewalks to the houses, safety of children, traffic and overall pedestrian safety. However, Member Faust said, in her opinion, you cannot assess for installation of sidewalks when the majority of residents do not want it. Member Maetzold stated he favored sidewalks. He believes the situation calls out for sidewalk. Maple Road is almost at a collector level for streets and he can only envision traffic increasing in the future. The street was not built to be a collector. Traffic in all suburban cities is rising because of congested freeways, more persons are commuting throughout the twin cities. Member Maetzold said the Maple Road sidewalk is a safety issue of children and other pedestrians, rather than trees or costs. He reported that he would feel badly if he had not taken this position and a child were injured. Member Maetzold believes the number of children in the area will continue to increase because in his experience, the number of children has grown dramatically throughout Edina. Member Maetzold felt that it is a matter of public policy to create a safe environment for residential neighborhoods and therefore, perhaps some way can be found to assist in the cost of Page 4 Minutes/Edina G!yCounciJ/April20,1998 installing sidewalks. He stated he did not hear anyone state the Maple Road issue is not a safety concern. Member Hovland acknowledged the response of the residents to the proposed sidewalk. He commended the neighbors for their willingness to participate -in the - process. - Member Hovland believed the Maple Road sidewalk is not an issue of sidewalks in isolation. Safety is bound into this issue. He pointed out that the majority of the residents' survey responded yes there was a safety concern and a traffic concern on Maple Road. Member Hovland noted the City's traffic consultant recommended installation of sidewalks as the most logical solution to the concern. He questioned whether this should be looked at on a larger scale, e.q. drainage, curb and gutter, storm sewer and street reconstruction. He suggested the street be posted with 25mph advisory signs, and the lighting improved. Member Hovland stated he would support sidewalks in the area. Member Kelly said he has driven the area a number of times and noted he agreed with Members Maetzold and Hovland in supporting the installation of sidewalks because of the importance of public safety. Member Kelly stated he believes the "majority issue" needs to be carefully scrutinized. Whether in Edina, or elsewhere, there are many times the "majority" wishes to do something or not do something, however, simply because the "majority" wants it, does not make it right. He stated in his opinion the hallmark of bad government is one that blindly endorses what the majority wants to do. Member Kelly acknowledged that the Maple Road sidewalk was a divisive issue, however, if someone is going to be upset by his decision, then the decision must be one of public safety of children and pedestrians. Member Kelly grew up in a neighborhood where all parents were concerned about all children and he believes Edina is still that way. Mayor Smith said previously, he had stated the current public policy regarding 'sidewalks. Mayor Smith agreed with the importance of the safety issue in the neighborhood. However, he questioned if installing five foot sidewalks is the only solution, and stated his concern that two five foot sidewalks in the neighborhood may bring the street closer to the homes, and possibly change the look of the neighborhood. He would not support two five foot sidewalks in this area and urged that staff look for a new design. Mayor Smith asked staff to evaluate whether, when certain traffic levels exist, would City participation become appropriate. Engineer Hoffman explained that the Engineering Department would not propose a two or three foot sidewalk, however, they would review designs for four, five or six foot sidewalks. Member Maetzold asked staff to review whether City participation should be considered. Member Kelly asked if Maple Road could be designated as a state aid road. Engineer Hoffman explained the City has only so many miles allocated to it for state aid streets and that if Maple Road is designated a state aid road then another street must loose its designation. He added that staff will bring back a report on public participation in the sidewalk. The Council discussed the type of vote needed for the project since it appeared that fewer than 35% of the residents signed the petition, and whether or not the notice was deficient. Manager Rosland suggested allowing staff to re- notify the residents, allowing staff to review the proposed design and City cost participation, and allowing the City Attorney to research exactly the type of vote needed, then bring back to Council at a later date. Member Faust will be absent at the May 18, 1998, therefore it was suggested to continue the issue to June 1, 1998. Page 5 Minutes/Edina QyCouncil/Apri120,1998 Mayor Smith directed staff to re- notify the residents, review the proposed design, look at potential City cost participation, research the legal vote needed to order the improvement, and he continued Council action until June 1, 1998. STREET RESURFACING IMPROVEMENT NO. A -183 AND STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT NO. STS -252 (WOODDALE GLEN) APPROVED Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Assistant Engineer Houle stated the City received a petition from 100% of the Wooddale Glen residents requesting resurfacing of their street and installation of storm sewer. He explained the proposed project would reconstruct Wooddale Glen from Wooddale Avenue to the end of the cul -de -sac along with the addition of a catch basin located on the easterly end of the project. The estimated cost of the project is $27,700 assessed at $4,900 per assessable lot with one back yard assessment at the one third rate. No public comment was heard. Member Hovland introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the City Council at their March 16, 1998, regular meeting, set a public hearing for Improvement No. A -183 and STS -252 Street Resurfacing and Storm Sewer Improvement to Wooddale Glen and WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council April 6, 1998, accepted the feasibility report for said improvement; and WHEREAS, ten days' mailed notice and two weeks' published notice of the hearing were given and the hearing was held thereon on the 20th day of April, 1998, at which time all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL, that Street Resurfacing and Storm Sewer Improvement to Wooddale Glen, Improvement Nos. A -183 STS - 252 is ordered as proposed. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Engineer is authorized to prepare plans and specifications and advertise for bids for the making of said improvement. Adopted this 201h day of April, 1998. Member Faust seconded. the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold, Smith Resolution adopted. CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENT NO A -095 (WOODDALE LANE) APPROVED Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Assistant Engineer Houle noted the City received a petition August 8, 1997, from 100% of the Wooddale Lane residents requesting street resurfacing with curb and gutter. The proposed project would involve reclaiming, the existing bituminous, then installing concrete curb and gutter, and repaving the roadway. The estimated project cost is $36,600 to be funded by approximately $4,100 per assessable lot along Wooddale Lane. Member Faust questioned whether the reclamation process has been adequately tested. Engineer Hoffman explained the test results of the already rebuilt streets using the reclamation process were satisfactory and the cost savings would recommend using this process. Page 6 Minutes/Edina CityCounci1/April20,1998 Public Comment Greg Walling, 5015 Wooddale Lane, asked if his property would need A retaining wall. Assistant Engineer Houle explained staff would work with Mr. Walling and only install a retaining wall if absolutely necessary. - -- Member Kelly introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the City Council at their March 16; 1998, regular meeting, set a public hearing for Improvement A -095 Curb and Gutter Improvement to Wooddale Lane; and WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council April 6, 1998, accepted the feasibility report for said improvement; and WHEREAS, ten days' mailed notice and two weeks' published notice of the hearing were given and the hearing was held thereon on the 201h day.of Apri1,1998, at which time all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL, that Curb and Gutter Improvement to Wooddale Lane, Improvement No. A -095 is ordered as proposed. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Engineer is authorized to prepare plans and specifications and advertise for bids for the making of said improvement. Adopted this 201h day of April, 1998. Member Hovland seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold, Smith Resolution adopted. PUBLIC HEARING DATE SET FOR MAY 4, 1998 - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CHRIST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH) Member Faust said she removed the setting of May 4, 1998, as public hearing for the Conditional Use Permit for Christ Presbyterian Church questioning whether variances would be required for the site. Planner Larsen said the size of the lots is known but will wait to see how they compare to the rest of the 500 foot neighborhood. Mayor Smith suggested the Council would need all pertinent information on the site prior to the May 4, 1998, meeting in order to make a decision. Planner Larsen said all information provided by the proponents will be made available to the Council previous to the hearing. Member Hovland made a motion setting May 4, 1998, as Public Hearing Date for the Conditional Use Permit for the Christ Presbyterian Church expansion. Member Maetzold seconded the motion. Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold, Smith Motion carried. *BID AWARDED FOR IRRIGATION SYSTEM - ARNESON ACRES PARK Motion made by Member Maetzold and seconded by Member Hovland for award of bid for Arneson Acres Park Irrigation System to recommended low bidder, Albrecht at $21,345.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *BID RETECTED FOR SALT STORAGE BUILDING (PUBLIC WORKS) Motion made by Member Maetzold and seconded by Member Hovland to reject all bids for the salt storage structure as submitted and have determined the public works crew could effectively build the structure. Page 7 Minutes/Edina CityCouncil/Apri120,1998 Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR ARTICULATED SIDEWALK PLOW Motion made by Member Maetzold and seconded by Member Hovland for award of bid for an articulated sidewalk plow to sole bidder; MacQueen Equipment at $51,592.86. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *TRAFFIC SAFETY' REPORT OF APRIL 7, 1998, APPROVED Motion made by Member Maetzold and seconded by Member Hovland approving Section A of the Traffic Safety Staff Report of April 7,1998; 1. Requesting Fairview Southdale Hospital to draft a letter to the Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) requesting a signing change proposal and requesting a letter from the City of Edina to accompany the Hospital letter requesting a change regarding the Fairview Southdale sign advising traffic to use the Valley View exit; 2. Request by staff at the business at 4400 France for 1 hour parking restriction posted for the south side of West 441h Street from France Avenue to the alley entrance/exit; and to acknowledge Sections B and C. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. RENAMING OF BRAEMAR ARENA COMMONS AREA TO TERRY DALEN COMMONS Park Director Keprios explained at the March 10, 1998, meeting, the Park Board approved Manager Rosland's recommendation to name the new commons area at Braemar Arena, "The Jerry Dalen Commons ". Jerry Dalen started working for the City of Edina in November 1955, and retired after 28 years in 1983 and is known as one of Edina High School hockey's biggest fans. After a brief discussion, Member Maetzold made a motion to rename the Braemar Arena Commons, "The Jerry Dalen Commons ". Member Hovland seconded the motion. Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Maetzold, Smith Abstaining: Kelly Motion carried. REGULATION OF CAMPAIGN SIGNS APPROVED; DRAFT ORDINANCE ORDERED Assistant Manager Hughes reported staff was asked to review the City Code with respect to the regulation of political campaign signs as well as if the Code should be amended providing more restrictions on size and number of such signs, especially restrictions limiting property owners to one sign per candidate. Section 460 of the City Code provides that: "Subd. 4 Campaign Signs. Subject to the applicable provisions of M.S. 211B.045, signs may be posted from August 1 in a State General Election year until ten days following the State General Election. Campaign signs erected in conjunction with elections held at times other than a State General Election are subject to the following restrictions: A. Maximum Size - six square feet B. Maximum Number - one sign for each candidate per frontage C. Maximum Duration - 60 days prior to the election until seven days following the election." Page 8 Minutes/Edina CityCouncil/April20,1998 Based upon this Subdivision, the City clearly may regulate signs during off -year elections (such as School Board Elections) or for special elections such as bond issue referenda. During State- wide elections, however, M.S.211B.045 affects our ability to regulate campaign signs. M.S.211B.045 Provides As Follows: - - - - - "In- -any municipality with an ordinance that regulates the -size of noncommercial signs, notwithstanding the provisions of that ordinance, all noncommercial signs of any size may be posted from August 1 in a State General Election year until ten days following the State General Election." Assistant Manager Hughes said he believes this statute clearly prohibits the City from restricting the size of non - commercial opinion signs during the stated time period. (A non - commercial opinion sign, such as a campaign sign, is one that expresses an opinion deemed by the courts to have greater protection than other signs such as those which advertise products, businesses, services, events and other matters of a commercial nature). It is unclear if M.S.211B.045 likewise prohibits regulations restricting the number or the location of such non - commercial signs during general elections. The League of Minnesota Cities (LMC) research specialist responded that the City may not be able to regulate the number of campaign signs, but can probably regulate their placement, especially relating to their proximity to public right -of -way. Attorney Gilligan agrees with their interpretation especially in light of case law dealing with such matters. If the City concluded it could restrict the number of signs per candidate per lot, enforcing such a limitation would be very difficult. An additional concern would be that limiting the number of campaign signs may inadvertently encourage larger signs proving to be of even more concern than multiple signs. Assistant Manager Hughes concluded based upon our interpretation of State Law and case law as well as the above concerns, we do not recommend an amendment to the City Code which limits the number of signs during the General Election season. Notwithstanding the previous recommendation, staff believes the City Code should be amended with respect to the placement of campaign signs. The City Code currently provides that all signs, whether temporary or permanent, must be set back at least 20 feet from a street and may not be placed on a public right -of -way (the boulevard). Since the width of the boulevard varies from location to location, it is difficult to know if the sign has been placed on a right -of -way. A simpler way may be to require campaign signs to observe 'a ten foot or so setback from the traveled portion of a street but not worry whether it is on a City right -of -way. Following a brief discussion, Council consensus directed staff to draft a City Code amendment regulating the placement of campaign signs at a ten foot or so setback from the traveled portion of a street and to include it on the May 4,1998, Council agenda. RESOLUTION AMENDING CENTENNIAL LAKES TRAFFIC AGREEMENT APPROVED Assistant Manager Hughes noted at the April 6, 1998, meeting, the Council adopted a resolution relating to the Centennial Lakes Traffic Agreement in order to clarify the effect of this agreement on the Phase 3 office building. The City of Bloomington, which is party to the Agreement, approved a similar resolution. At the April 6, meeting, Attorney Gilligan advised that an Page 9 Minutes/Edina CityCouncil/April20,1998 Amendment to the Agreement was being negotiated with Bloomington and would be submitted to the Council for approval. Staff proposed to amend the respective agreement for the purpose of simplifying their requirements. The amendments would provide the following: • Traffic counts may now be initiated at any time following commencement of the fourth office building at Centennial Lakes and the third building at Minnesota Center rather, than following completion and occupancy of these buildings. This would allow the developments to proceed without unnecessary delays. • The initiation of the traffic counts and studies are now triggered by the construction of a certain amount of office floor area on the respective sites rather than the construction of specific office buildings. This would take into account that the plans for each project have changed since the original approvals. (Under the present agreement, building four at Centennial Lakes could not proceed until building three is built and occupied followed by the completion of the traffic study. This would effectively delay building four until 1999 which could effect our ability to complete south park and collect tax increments in a more timely fashion.) • Hennepin County and Mn /DOT no longer involved in the traffic studies. This seemed to be an unnecessary complication. • The requirements for post development traffic counts and remedial actions ' has been eliminated in that it places long term burdens on these properties that are not shared by other properties in the area. Also, the present development plans for Minnesota Center and Centennial Lakes makes it extremely doubtful that the maximum traffic-, generation for these properties will ever be reached. • The maximum traffic generation which could result from each development remains unchanged. Member Hovland made a motion approving the Amendment to the Centennial Lakes Agreement and authorizing the Mayor and City Manager to execute the Amendment to the Resolution adopted April 6,1998. Member Maetzold seconded the motion. Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold, Smith Motion carried. *RESOLUTION ORDERING "NO PARKING" ON. WEST 78TH STREET Member Maetzold introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption, seconded by Member Hovland: RESOLUTION RELATING TO PARKING RESTRICTIONS ON WEST 78TH STREET FROM EAST BUSH LAKE ROAD TO GLEASON ROAD (S.A.P.120- 160 -05) THIS RESOLUTION, passed this 20th day of April, 1998, by the City of Edina, in Hennepin County, Minnesota. The Municipal corporation shall hereinafter be called the "City", WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the "City" has planned the improvement of MSAS 160, West 78th Street from East Bush Lake Road to Gleason Road. WHEREAS the "City" will be expending Municipal Street . Aid Funds on the improvement of this Street, and WHEREAS, this improvement does not provide adequate width for parking on both sides of the street; and approval of the proposed construction as a Municipal State Aid Street project must therefor be conditioned upon certain parking restrictions. Page 10 Minutes/Edina CityCouncil/Apri120,1998 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS THEREBY RESOLVED that the "City" shall ban the parking of motor vehicles on both sides of MSAS 160, West 78th Street, at all times. Dated this 201h day of April, 1998. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *RESOLUTION RECEIVING PETITION AND ORDERING PROTECT AUTHORIZING TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT WEST 76TH STREET AND UNITED PROPERTIES DRIVEWAY (100% PETITION IMPROVEMENT) Member Maetzold introduced the following resolution seconded by Member Hovland: RESOLUTION RECEIVING PETITION AND ORDER TRAFFIC SIGNAL (TS -24) WHEREAS, a certain petition, signed by the property owners of 7601 and 7501 France Avenue requesting a traffic signal at their driveways, and requesting the Council assess the entire cost of said improvement against the aforementioned property owners, was received by the City Council at their January 5,1998, meeting. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE City Council for the City of Edina, Minnesota as follows: 1. It is hereby found and determined that a petition has been filed requesting the Council to construct a traffic signal on West 761h Street at United Properties Driveway, and to assess the entire cost against the petitioners, and that said _petition has been signed by both owners of the real property where said traffic signal is to be located. 2. The making of said improvement in accordance with said petition is hereby ordered pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 429. Said improvement is hereby designated and shall be referred to in all subsequent proceedings as (TRAFFIC SIGNAL TS -24). The entire cost of said improvement is hereby ordered to be assessed against the properties abutting on West 761h Street and United Properties Driveway where said signal is to be located. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH Mn/DOT - TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT TH 169 AND LONDONDERRY ROAD Member Maetzold introduced the following resolution, seconded by Member Hovland: RESOLUTION BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Edina enter into an agreement with the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation for the following purposes, to wit: To revise new traffic control signals, emergency vehicle pre - emption, interconnect and signing of the east ramp of the TH 169 and Londonderry Road intersection; in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth and contained in Traffic Signal Agreement No. 77359 IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and the Manager are authorized to execute the Agreement. Passed this 201h day of April, 1998. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. CLAIMS PAID Member Maetzold made a motion to approve payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated April 15, 1998, and consisting of 31 pages: General Fund $356,217.53; C.D.B.G. $3,900.00; Communications $1,342.72; Working Capital $13,423.98; Art Center $5,647.54; Golf Dome Fund $7,171.10; Swimming Pool Fund $4,675,63; Golf Course Fund $77,727.56; Ice Arena Fund $20,024.61; Edinborough/Centennial Lakes $18,722.33; Utility Fund $76,489.13; Storm Sewer Utility Fund $4,102.83; Recycling Program $34,858.59; Liquor Dispensary Fund $205,090.80; Construction Fund $113,519.04; Park Bond Page 11 Minutes/Edina CityCouncil/Apri120,1998 ` Fund $25,534.38; TOTAL $968,447.77, and for confirmation of payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated April 3, 1998, and consisting of 2 pages: General Fund $170,839.54; Golf Dome Fund $23,760.84; Edinborough/ Centennial Lakes $85.00; Utility Fund $750.00; Liquor Dispensary Fund $70,901.43; I-494 Commission $7,430.75; TOTAL $273,767.56. Member Faust seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold, Smith Motion carried. There being no further business .on the Council Agenda, Mayor Smith declared the meeting adjourned at 11:25 P.M. City Clerk Page 12 MINUTES OF THE OF THE EDINA BOARD OF REVIEW APRIL 20,1998 5:00 P.M. Answering rollcall for the continued meeting of the Board of Review were Members Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold, and Mayor Smith. Assessor Petersburg noted receipt of three letters on April 20, 1998 from the following residents: Assessors Owner's Est. Name /Address PID Number Est. Mkt. Value Market Value Calvin Simmons 18- 028 -24 -24 -0009 $510,700 $500,000 4619 Wooddale Ave Hilbert S. Weiner 31- 117 -21 -32 -0085 $95,300 6936 Langford Drive David and Lisa Baldridge, 05- 116 -21 -31 -0043 $213,900 5824 West 68th Street Assessor Petersurg requested the Council sustain the assessor's value on the three properties, because of the lateness of the submittal. LiowCv�r, this still preserves the property owner's ability to continue on to Hennepin County. The Board reviewed each property previously submitted and discussed whether to sustain, decrease or increase the assessors estimated market value. Motion by Member Kelly, seconded by Chair Smith to reduce the Estimated Market Value of 5012 Schaefer Road, PID No. 30- 117 -2142 -0021 to $600,000 from $735,000. Rollcall: Ayes: Kelly, Smith Nayes: Faust, Hovland, Maetzold Motion defeated. Motion by Member Hovland, seconded by Member Faust to reduce the Estimated Market Value of 5012 Schaefer Road, PID No. 30- 117 -21-42 -0021 to $700,000 from $735,000. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold, Smith Motion carried. Motion by Member Faust, seconded by Member Hovland to reduce the Estimated Market Value of 6627 Limerick Drive, PID No. 05- 11602141 -0066 to $239,800 from $244,000. Rollcall: Ayes: Faust Nayes: Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold, Smith Motion defeated. Page 1 Minutes/Edina Board of Review /April 20,1998 Motion by Member Maetzold, seconded by Member Faust to sustain the Assessor's Estimated Market Value or accept the staff recommendations as noted for the following properties. Assessors Owners Staff Name Address /PID Est. Mk Val Est. Mk Val Recomm. Gary Phillips 32- 028 -24 -24- 0361 $47,900 $43,500 Sustain 7350 York Av. S Peter & Georgine Johnson 07- 028 -24-42 -0042 $131,900 $124,500 4309 42nd St. W. Frank & Janet Lederle 18- 028 -24-21 - 037 $464,800 $420,000 4507 Browndale Ave. Kit & Sumonda Arom 30- 117 -21 -43 -0063 $1,981,800 $1,650,000 5200 Schaefer Rd. Harry Lindberry, represented 30- 117 -21 -23 -002 & others $930,000 0 by Robert Gisvold, Esq. 6901 Maloney Avenue Theodor H. Herman 06- 116- 21-- 3?-nn47 $155,300 $145,000 6720 Sarn�,-;el- c i Norman Company 28- 117 -21 -0038 $6,600,400 $5,885,300 Norman Bjorness, Jr. 5400 Vernon Av. Norman Company 30- 117 -21 -32 -0019 & 30- 117 -21 -33 =0064 $9,647,200 18,682,500 Norman Bjorness, Jr. 5200 -5241 Lincoln Dr. James Platt, Jr. 08- 116 -21 -33 -0142 $249,700 $236,960 7723 Tanglewood Ct. Irving & Charlotte Nydell 07- 028 -24-13 -0040 $137,200 $132,000 John Carlson Prakash & Kamala Puram Donald H. Hansen Michael & Allison Pelach Jacquleine S. Mithun 4015 Lynn Av. S. 32- 117 -21 -12 -0047 5509 Merritt Circle 05- 116 -21 -41 -0066 6627 Limerick Drive 06- 116 -21 -32 -0071 6737 Apache Road 18- 028 -24 -14 -0056 4833 Townes Road 18- 028 -24-44 -0067 5308 Halifax Av. Page 2 $189,000 $179,000 $244,000 $229,000 $390,000 $375,000 $180,800 $170,000 $186,500 $177,000 Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain Sustain Minutes/Edina Board of Review /April 20,1998 Page 3 City Clerk Assessors Owners Staff Name Address /PID Est. Mk Val Est. Mk Val Recomm Timothy & Kristi Healy 07- 028 -24-43 -0058 $227,000 $179,000 $216,000 4409 Morningside Road . Robert Levine, Partner 08- 116 -21 -11 -0018 $918,200 $760,000 Sustain 5400 W. 70th St. Robert & Margaret Fink 31- 117 -21 -11- 0008 $445,00 $350,000 $390,000 6200 Parkwood Rd Marie Hidem & 07- 028 -24-44 -0050 $151,300 $137,000 $146,000 Michael Mankey 4007 Sunnyside Road Ann Marie & Britt Rogers 19- 028 -24- 114 -0063 $325,000 Sustain 5641 Woodcrest Dr. Donald M. gevre 31- 028 -24-21 -0009 $195,300 Sustain 7016 West Shore Dr. Cheryl Eastbourne 28- 117 -21 -23 -0100 $186,000 $171,000 $172,600 5233 Hollywood Road i Calvin Simmons 18- 028 -24 -24 -0009 $510,700 $500,000 Sustain 4619 Wooddale Ave Hilbert S. Weiner 31- 117 -21 -32 -0085 $95,300 $95,300 Sustain 6936 Langford Drive Sustain David & Lisa Baldridge 05- 116 -21 -31 -0043 $213,900 $213,900 Sustain 5824 West 68th Street Rollcall: Ayes: Faust, Hovland, Kelly, Maetzold, Smith Motion carried. Motion of Member Kelly and seconded by Member Maetzold for adjournment of the 1998 Board of Review. Motion carried unanimously. Adjournment at 6:15 P.M. Page 3 City Clerk 'w'91N�11 1 0 v � ! REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # II. A. From: Francis J. HoffmanA. Consent City Engineer Information Only ❑ Date: May 4, 1998 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Vacation of a Portion of Action ❑ Motion Utility and Drainage ® Resolution Easement on Lot 2, Block 1, Ordinance Normand ale-Kreiser Replat ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Approve vacation of portion of utility easement on Lot 2, Block 1, Normandale- Kreiser Replat. Info /Background: The property owner is proposing to expand his garage, and his new proposal would extend onto an existing utility and drainage easement. This request has been reviewed by NSP, U.S. West, Paragon Cable, Minnegasco and City staff. All parties find this request acceptable and staff would recommend vacation of a portion of the utility and drainage easement as depicted on the attached graphic. Ch Ol Ol Z 2 --i R1 ;Plj m O r- m -- r u � o O {' rN.O °01'00 "E. -_ o - „ 143.43 0 - CL CD cc rn / 0 nhole a-19.33 ioa �N P A R N E L L UTILITY EA5EMENT 9 51 - " - - -- 41.84-- -- r, 5' 0h o Ln p.° AVE NUE 0 to � to a No O cis ZI LO o O r m m a.c o T TIN �• �� ,� , • GJ �5 FT. UTILITY E45EMENT — 71.00 - --' FOUND IRON �-S. 0° 01'00 "W. a 4 o e o REPORT/RECOMMENDATION • f��bReOMT'- • lees To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item: III. A. From: Craig Larsen Consent ❑ City Planner Information Only ❑ Date: May 7, 1998 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: C -98 -1, Conditional Use Action ❑ Motion Permit. Christ Presbyterian Church. ® Resolution 6901 Normandale Road. ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit for Christ Presbyterian Church subject to the following conditions: 1. Vacation of existing West 69th Street right -of -way, and dedication of new right -of -way as illustrated on revised site plan (option 5). 2. Developer's Agreement to cover cost and provide security for construction of the new street. 3. All necessary permits from Nine Mile Creek Watershed District and the Minnesota Department of Transportation. 4. Modification of curb cuts on northerly portion of site as recommended by the Director of Public Works. 5. Curb cut on West 701h Street should remain where it is today or be moved further west as determined by the Director of Public Works. 6. The subdivision and replatting of lots north of the relocated West 69th Street. 7. No portion of Phase II construction can commence until replatted lots are sold with deed restrictions. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Since the meeting of the Planning Commission certain actions have taken place which address conditions 4, 6, and 7. Condition 4. The attached site plan (option 5) has been modified to adjust the curb cuts as recommended by the Director of Public Works. Condition 6. The church has made application for subdivision of the properties north of a relocated West 691h Street. The Planning Commission will consider the proposed subdivision at their May 27th meeting. The proposed subdivision proposes two new lots fronting on West 691h Street. Condition 7. The attached memorandum from the City Attorney addresses the platting, sale and future use of the properties located north of the relocated street. Also attached to this cover: Revised site plan and landscaping plan, original submission booklet, Staff reports and public correspondence. MEMORANDUM FROM CITY ATTORNEY STAFF REPORTS v.'Vli :JO AAA. 1V•iV C'" iu1LVtVLU -i -e vui%azi vin11.%Z1 151AZ P, 31 111 11105 . TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Kenneth E. Rosland, City Manager FROM: Jerry Gilligan DATE: April 30, 1998 RE: Christ Presbyterian Church Expansion - Development Agreement between HRA and Church for Single Family Lots to be Created The proposed expansion of Christ Presbyterian Church includes the creation of one or more lots which the Church intends to sell for residential development. The Planning Commission conditioned its recommendation of approval of the conditional use permit for the expansion on restrictions being imposed on the residential lots to ensure that they are not converted to church use at a later date. Staff has asked for recommendations as to the manner in which the restrictions can be imposed on the lots. o . If the City Council wishes to ensure that the lots are sold by tie development as single family residences and cannot later be converted to Church property, I would recommend that the Edina HRA and the Church enter into a Development Agreement with respect to the lots. The Development Agreement would provide for the following: (i) the platting of the lots in a timely manner; (ii) that the Church would have a reasonable period of time (24 months or commencement of construction of Phase II of the expansion whichever occurs earlier) to market the lots and sell them for development of single family residences; (iii) if any lot is not sold by the end of the period set forth in (ii) above, such lot would be forfeited by the Church to the HRA; (iv) any lot forfeited to the IIRA would be sold by the HRA for development of single family residences and the proceeds received by the HRA from such sale less expenses of the HRA would be paid to the Church; (v) the deed transferring title to any lot would contain restrictions which will run in favor of the HRA and provide that the property may not be used for church purposes or any other use which would cause the property to be exempt from real estate taxes. Attached hereto are the proposed deed restrictions. These deed DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP Wj UUL uJ / VI/ y0 rAl LU:ly r.AA 1014d)4UZ044 l/Uxatl luillMy 16003 restrictions would be required whether the lot is sold by the Church or to HRA if the lot is forfeited to the HRA. The Development Agreement would be recorded in the real estate records as a lien against the property and will provide that it will not be released by the HRA as to a lot until sale of such lot with the required deed restrictions and to finishing to the HRA of evidence satisfactory to the HRA that the purchaser intends to construct a single family residence on the lot and has secured construction financing or has sufficient available funds for this purpose. The HRA has broad authority to provide for housing and other development in the City, and the Development Agreement will recite that it is being entered into in furtherance of this purpose in order to ensure development of the lots from single family housing in a timely manner. All costs related to the Development Agreement will be required to be paid by the Church. The provisions as to forfeiture of title to the property is similar to what was required by the HRA in the Redevelopment Agreements for the Edinborough and Centennial Lakes projects and is a fairly standard provision in redevelopment contracts with development authorities. 'W., DORS EY & WHITNEY L L P V • i J V 1 6 V Q V L V 4 -! V V'M a G 1 I l n l l IN i. l PROPOSED DEED RESTRICTIONS 1. The Property shall not be exempt from real estate taxes notwithstanding the ownership or use of the Property. parties: 2. The Property shall not be sold, transferred, conveyed or leased to any of the following (a) An institution of purely public charity; (b) A church or ancillary tax exempt housing; (c) A public hospital; (d) A public school district; (e) An organization exempt from federal income taxes pursuant to Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of. 1986, as amended; or 3. The Property shall not be used for any of the following purposes: (a) The operation of a public charity, (b) A church or house of worship; (c) The operation of a public hospital; (d) The operation of a public schoolhouse, academy, college, university, or seminary of learning; or (e) A parking lot or parking ramp. 4. The covenants and restrictions herein contained shall run with the title to the Property and shall be binding upon all present and future owners and occupants of the Property; provided, however, that the covenants and restrictions herein contained shall inure only to the benefit of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority, a public body corporate under the laws of the State of Minnesota (the "FIR."), and may be released or waived in whole or in part at any time, and from time to time, by the sole act of the HRA, and variances may be granted to the covenants and restrictions herein contained by the sole act of the HRA. These covenants and restrictions shall be enforceable only by the HRA, and only the PIRA shall have the right to sue for and obtain an injunction, prohibitive or mandatory, to prevent the breach of the covenants and restrictions herein contained, or to enforce the performance or observance thereof. LVJ oU4 ..u. — ..0 ...a --- a.i_a VVAJJ:.1 n1111..G1 CUU0 5. If any one or more of the covenants or restrictions contained in this Deed are held to be invalid or enforceable, the same shall in no way affect any of the other provisions of this Deed, which shall remain in full force and effect. i - wx k- d, r a vA OLANNING DFPAIZ EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT APRIL 15, 1998 C -98 -1 Conditional Use Permit Christ Presbyterian Church 6901 Normandale Road The Planning Commission first considered the application for Conditional Use Permit by Christ Presbyterian Church on February 25, 1998. The Conditional Use Permit would allow for a two phase addition to the church and an expanded parking lot. After hearing several hours of testimony, the Commission voted to continue the hearing. The Commission will recall the original proposal contained four alternative site plans. Two of those plans suggested the elimination of 691h Street, and two suggested relocating 691h Street northerly of its present location. Staff recommended approval of option 3 which relocated 69th Street to the north, and provided a curb cut from the parking lot to the relocated street. Attached to this report is a revised site plan which is presented by the Church for Commission consideration. The revised site plan is similar to the original Option 3 plan. The revised plan illustrates a relocated 691h Street, contains a similar amount of parking ( 541 vs. 546 parking spaces), and would provide access from the parking lot to the relocated street. The primary difference between the two plans is the treatment of properties north of the relocated street. The original plan suggested the removal of three existing houses north of the existing 691h street. The revised plan would remove two houses, one on Normandale Road and one on Brittany Road. The revised plan also suggests combining excess properties now controlled by the church to create two, new single family lots fronting on 691h Street. The proposed plans continue to illustrate a two phase expansion of the church. In phase one a new 951 seat sanctuary would be constructed. Phase two would add a 28,680 square foot office /education addition to the north side of the church. The proposed expansion of the church and the phasing remain unchanged. Access to the relocated West 691h Street has been modified from the original proposal. The revised plan illustrates 2 curb cuts on 69" Street and no access to the frontage road. The attached Memo from Fran Hoffman suggests relocating the curb cuts similar to that shown on the original plan. Specifically, the easterly curb cut should be moved west to align with the central drive aisle, and the westerly curb cut should be moved from 691h Street to the frontage road. RECOMMENDATION The revised site plans retains the advantages offered by the plan originally supported by staff while offering some improvements. The public street would remain, providing neighborhood and public safety access as it exists today. The plan continues to provide adequate on -site parking for expected church activities. Fin.911 ±hn nk -n minimizes the loss of homes by replacing 2 of 3 houses removed for the expansion. A Planning Commission recommendation for approval should be conditioned on: 1. Vacation of existing 691h Street right -of -way, and dedication of a new right -of -way as illustrated on the revised plan. 2. Developer's Agreement to cover construction of new street. 3. All necessary permits from the Watershed District and MNDOT 4. Modification of new curb cuts per recommendation of the Director of Public Works. Memo To: Craig Larsen, City Planner From: Fran Hoffman, Director of Public Works. CC: File Date: April 10, 1998 Re: Christ Presbyterian Church After reviewing the latest proposal, I would offer the following comments: A. It approved, a Developer's Agreement would be required to rebuild West 690 Street B. Easements would need to be retained under the old West 69th Street right -of -way for utilities. C. The curb cuts as proposed should be relocated to the frontage road and mid- point on West 690 Street between the frontage road and Brittany. D. Proposed West 69th Street would need a different alignment in the curve section, and due to the width, on- street parking would not be allowed. E. Plan includes on -site water control for storm water, but relies on use of the MNDOT pond west of the site for water quality control. Staff and the Watershed District would support this if the project is approved. This concept is called regional ponding versus each site having it's own small pond. F. The two new lots north of the new street would need private easements across the Church property to utilize existing sewer and water lines. • Page 1 EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT FEBRUARY 25, 1998 C -98 -1 Conditional Use Permit Christ Presbyterian Church 6901 Normandale Road Christ Presbyterian Church has applied for a Conditional Use Permit to allow for a two phase expansion of their building. The church has also petitioned for the vacation of West 691h Street to allow an expansion of the parking lot to support the larger church. Phase I of the proposed expansion would include the construction of a new. sanctuary, remodeling and converting the existing sanctuary into a narthex, and expansion of the parking lot. Phase II would add a classroom- office addition to the north side of the existing building, and completion of the expanded parking lot. According to church representatives, if approved, Phase I would proceed immediately. Currently there is not a definite time line for the Phase II improvements. In addition to the existing church site, six other properties are included in the proposed expansion. Five of these properties are located north of West 691h Street; they include two vacant lots fronting on West 691h Street, one house on Normandale Road, two houses on Brittany Road, and one house fronting on West 701h Street. Adding these properties to the existing site yields a 9.3 acre tract. As presently developed, the church has a total site area of 6.8 acres. The sanctuary, including overflow seating, has seating for 648 persons. The parking lot holds 350 vehicles. Phase I of the proposal would see the construction of a new, two level sanctuary with a seating capacity of 951 persons. To support the larger sanctuary the parking lot would be expanded to 589 spaces. Phase II would add a classroom - office addition of 28,680 square feet to the north side of the existing church. Also, the parking lot would be expanded by 58 spaces. The church has submitted four alternative site plans for City review. Options 1 and 2 suggest the vacation of West 691h Street. Option 1 would provide a curb cut allowing access to Brittany Road. Option 2 would not have the curb cut, thus, no access to the neighborhood would exist. Options 3 and 4 illustrate the northerly relocation of West 691h Street. Option 3 would provide access to the relocated street from the parking lot, Option 4 would not. Options 1 and 2 would provide 647 parking spaces, Options 3 and 4 would provide 546 spaces. The church has indicated they prefer Option 1, with the curb cut providing access to and from the neighborhood. ZONING COMPLIANCE Parking. The Zoning Ordinance requires one parking space for each three seats in the sanctuary, plus additional parking adequate to satisfy parking demand for concurrent activities. Thus, a 951 seat sanctuary would require 317 parking spaces plus additional parking to meet concurrent activity demand. Site plan 1 and 2 would provide 330 additional spaces. Site plan 3 and 4 would provide 229 additional spaces. Building setbacks. The Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum setback of 50 feet for churches. A small portion of the existing church encroaches into the required setback, but all proposed additions meet or exceed the required setback. Parking setbacks. The Zoning Ordinance requires a 20 foot parking setback from streets, a 10 foot setback from interior property lines. The proposed parking setbacks meet or exceed ordinance requirements. The parking lot is setback between 15 and 30 feet from the north and east property lines. Building height. Building height is limited to 40 feet for Conditional Use buildings in the R -1 district. Height is the vertical distance between the grade at the front of the building to the mid -point between the eave line and the ridge. The proposed sanctuary measures 44 feet in height. Thus, a 4 foot building height variance is requested. TRAFFIC Included in the church application is a traffic study that analyzes the impact of the proposed alternative plans on the surrounding streets. The study concludes that while the two alternatives which provide neighborhood access would have some impact on Brittany Road and Dunberry Road, the street would operate at acceptable residential street volumes. The study also suggests the expanded parking lot would eliminate the parking that now occurs on these streets. The traffic study and alternative site plans have been reviewed by police, fire, engineering and planning staff. All departments feel it is essential that access to and from the neighborhood is preserved. The Fire Department conducted. a time -trial study to determine if vacating West 69" Street would impact response times to the neighborhood. The Department found that the proposed vacation would not have a significant impact on response times. Site plan Options 1 and 3 would satisfy concerns of City Staff. RECOMMENDATION Staff is recommending approval of the Conditional Use Permit, and would recommend that site plan Option 3 be approved. The Zoning Ordinance sets forth findings the City Council must make before granting a Conditional Use Permit. Those findings are attached to this report. Staff believes the required findings can be made for the following reasons: • Churches are allowed only in the R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District. Thus, churches are considered compatible uses within residential neighborhoods. • The church is located at a freeway interchange, and a major collector street. Traffic impact on nearby residential streets is limited. • West 70th Street is the busiest during the weekday a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Since churches are primarily off -peak generators, the proposal should not significantly impact peak hour congestion on West 701h Street. • Except for building height, the proposed plans comply with all Zoning Ordinance requirements. The proposed sanctuary height of 44 feet is similar -to the height of Colonial Church. Colonial is 43 feet tall. Because of the location of the building, the height will not have a detrimental impact on neighboring properties. • The proposed expansion will result in a facility similar in size to other churches in the community. As proposed Christ Presbyterian would become the fifth largest church in Edina. • The current parking lot does not have capacity to satisfy current demand. The proposed expanded lot would reduce on- street parking. • Site plan Option 3 would continue to provide unrestricted access to the neighborhood, as it is today. Approval should be conditioned on: 1. Vacation of West 691h Street 2. Dedication of new right -of -way. 3. Construction of new street to City standard 4. Watershed District permit Memo TO: Ted Paulfranz, Fire Chi. From: Steve Landry, Captain Date: February 18, 1998 Re: Response Study Related to Christ Presbyterian Church Project An emergency response study was conducted relating to the possible Closing of W. 69"' St. due to a proposed Christ Presbyterian Church Project. The subject of the study was, what impact would this closing have on emergency response to the properties in the area of Brittany Road and W. 69'" St. and access to the Church itself duri:iq . h +h nli+ r-1 non - critical traffic situations based on the following assumptions 1. Critical traffic conditions occurred during rush hour periods. The time slot selected for this response trial was between the hours of 4 and 5 p.m. 2. Non - critical traffic conditions occurred during mid -day or evening. The time slot selected for this response trial was between 7 and 8 p.m. 3. The trial runs were conducted as Code 3 responses in order to provide actual emergency response times. 4. The trials included both Engines and Ambulances to reflect the possible differences in types of responses. 5. The trials were conduct starting from both stations 1 and 2 to reflect all typical responses. 6. Finally the two most likely routes from each station were selected to compare access to the target area from both 66th St. and 7& St. The results of the study indicates that there is no significant impact on emergency response to the target area from either station using either route. Based on the need for access to the church, I would highly recommend maintaining access through the parking area to accommodate emergency vehicles as well as church traffic during peak usage periods. • Page 1 A,;, REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # lll. A. From: Francis J. Hoffman,^- Consent ❑ City Engineer Information Only ❑ Date: May 4, 1998 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Request to Vacate Action ❑ Motion W. 691h Street between ® Resolution Brittany Road and El Ordinance Normandale Frontage Road ❑ Discussion Recommendation: If the Christ Presbyterian Church proposal receives approval, then authorize vacation of W. 69'x' Street subject to relocation of the street onto a new right -of -way through developer's agreement and preserve existing rights for NSP, U.S. West and Minnegasco. Info /Background: This request is tied to the current Christ Presbyterian Church proposal. The attached sketch depicts the request to vacate the existing street location. NSP, Minnegasco and U.S. West all would accept the vacation subject to reserving their rights to remain where they are currently located, or be relocated at church expense if necessary. Staff recommends this request subject to church receiving an approval to their request and an executed developer's agreement. X rri Lot 19 109— - - - - -- - Jii rn III II I III rn . . . ......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . SOUTH ai0d BRITTANY ROAD AREA TO BE VACATED 4 SOUTM 113.13 SOUTH HI I of A §OUT ft SOUTH 85.54 85.E J- iu 01 • 85.60 1 BRITTANY ROAD AREA TO BE VACATED 4 RETAINING REMOVE EXISTING ENTRANCE AND REPLACE CURB 00 H O W OW v) "1® (1� ®; I I\ 1/ I P TIO r– EaeruNlNG N4L9 \ / I SA WAY I - F.ENT sKNAGE SCALE I' GENERAL SITE RAN NOTES I. PROTECT ALL EXISTING TREES TO REl'IAIN DURING CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED TO KEEP THEM ALIVE. 2. ME SHEET L2.6 FOR LANDSCAPE RAN S. SEE CIVIL DRANING5 FOR GRADING PLAN. r. LOCATE CONCRETE SPLASN BLOCKS AT DISOIARGE DP LAC. OONN SPOUT. 6. ALL PARKING LAYOUT DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CURD. e. ALL ENTRIES INTO BUILDING TO HAVE STOOPS W FOUNDATIONS. EMOVe EXISTING STREET ALL ABUTTING NALR9 SMCIJLD BE DOTELED INTO NALIL9 POURED AND REPLACE CURB ON STOOPS. SITE OPERATING NOTES I. NO PARKING NULL BE ALLONED ON SURROUNDING PUBLIC STREETS, AD CIRCULATION PAR OR FIRE LANES DURING CONSTRUCTION. 2. ALL APPROVED PARKING SMALL BE DESIGNATED NITN NMITE SURFACE NORMANDALE TIARKING5 NON AND IN THE FUTURE NMEN REPAINTED. SITE DEMOLITION NOTES I I I. ME CIVIL DRANING5 FOR ALL CONCRETE CURBS, SIDENALKS, DRIvEs, I AND PADS TO BE REMOVED. I I e • ' 2. SEE CIVIL DRANINGS FOR ALL DRIVENAYS AND ASSOCIATED CURBS _ • AND APRONS ENTERING THE SITE FROM THE AD.IACENT ROADS TO BE 3. SEE ISTING • —, —' ' y' _ REMEOL . RAN _ T I I WCIVI DINGS FOR AREAS OF ROADNAYS TAT NEED TO BE IRETIAIN ' , • ' I I I 1 I REa RBEDTO FM BE DISTURBED INDTF� TION.TT L CURBS AN SMALL ROADPATS 5A,I WT AND REPAIRS SMALL BE MADE TO CITY SPECIFICATIONS. WE CIVIL DRANINGS FOR ALL SITUFUNOUS SURFACES TO BE RE ED. b I - I S. INSTAL A 4' -0' NIGM TEMPORARY FENCE AROUND EXISTING TREES TO P ,SE �� PROTECT TMEFI FRO" DAMAGE, FENCE SHALL F0.LOM DRIP LINE OF Tar /(bDUDCI7jTT I HA TREES. LOT ALL EXISTING ENTRANCES AND ROADS THAT ARE TO BE REMOVED SMALL BE REPUTED BY NEN CURBS AND LANDSCAPINGAS PER CITY ,R,Fa.AA" , TW MVnc I IU �1E l ; A •6 . I. I f Ne-PARRIN \ \ I T, ON ON WE 1.1 oil ME -ij MEN �' p ar:0 I C ■ �, I. Yli li 1 1 Z. AND REPLACE CURBS 1 8r6 U' 9•-q 8328 S.F. ww LOT e66' X 13T-Q 1L70 S.F. I �x III To SLR PARKING SIGN 17 0 SENIOR PARKING r1ENIOR PARKING SIGN I� NOT TO SCALE e PARKING HANDICAP` STOP PARKIN ONL a HANDICAP ertwrm nvw: Pw. w rue w ro ve ACCESS •• 12• wieu Nn OXVrea AISLE NT . a rtunexw Tanroe rinem IN. Tea • e I /PPP ' T °•' T -T T FmT Opt e e rlAlom rae era ME . oaeNm ee • Mr ae.I® ease oTI..eY reGXARe Fe. r,1n.Pn PmXAI RAMP IN THE SIDEWALK pwryp IN THE SIDENALK r1CONR 3 Nor TCONCRETE A I A AM AI TD E SAN I EA AM AI ONA91 P G 61 —5-1 IGN GTB 4 TD E 5 E SCALE SCALE NOT TO SCALE nnc V R V C u eL Cr L .y.^ VI � C �— W •L Tushie V f� Montgomery Assoc. S Inc. Rj � rlu esceo..wr� b Dr,P.•e . SNU Novae 3300 EON+w o Way. •601 .12.830 -82 A6n FAX: SSe3B 612.630 -8208 FAX: B30-015 awm.,[C,IR.I ND DAL K[eeK I:..K3 wR r CTPreXKE NR M AeDe,iCT. AL O}AOI l- R K amTeOfl A'O a,I[exQ. AH N:e®Y rsnKRlY eE3TAVE6. SITE PLAN Oran By RK PTe•ecl McNleel Tr CNeckeE By TL, OT Del. 5•1 -e8 Ravieioro now R81000 O ■� p no My PFO ecl NR. L1.0 D -112� � Will �I =I jell � p Is, IV . t.. a.� p r ,. _ .= SCALE I' GENERAL SITE RAN NOTES I. PROTECT ALL EXISTING TREES TO REl'IAIN DURING CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED TO KEEP THEM ALIVE. 2. ME SHEET L2.6 FOR LANDSCAPE RAN S. SEE CIVIL DRANING5 FOR GRADING PLAN. r. LOCATE CONCRETE SPLASN BLOCKS AT DISOIARGE DP LAC. OONN SPOUT. 6. ALL PARKING LAYOUT DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CURD. e. ALL ENTRIES INTO BUILDING TO HAVE STOOPS W FOUNDATIONS. EMOVe EXISTING STREET ALL ABUTTING NALR9 SMCIJLD BE DOTELED INTO NALIL9 POURED AND REPLACE CURB ON STOOPS. SITE OPERATING NOTES I. NO PARKING NULL BE ALLONED ON SURROUNDING PUBLIC STREETS, AD CIRCULATION PAR OR FIRE LANES DURING CONSTRUCTION. 2. ALL APPROVED PARKING SMALL BE DESIGNATED NITN NMITE SURFACE NORMANDALE TIARKING5 NON AND IN THE FUTURE NMEN REPAINTED. SITE DEMOLITION NOTES I I I. ME CIVIL DRANING5 FOR ALL CONCRETE CURBS, SIDENALKS, DRIvEs, I AND PADS TO BE REMOVED. I I e • ' 2. SEE CIVIL DRANINGS FOR ALL DRIVENAYS AND ASSOCIATED CURBS _ • AND APRONS ENTERING THE SITE FROM THE AD.IACENT ROADS TO BE 3. SEE ISTING • —, —' ' y' _ REMEOL . RAN _ T I I WCIVI DINGS FOR AREAS OF ROADNAYS TAT NEED TO BE IRETIAIN ' , • ' I I I 1 I REa RBEDTO FM BE DISTURBED INDTF� TION.TT L CURBS AN SMALL ROADPATS 5A,I WT AND REPAIRS SMALL BE MADE TO CITY SPECIFICATIONS. WE CIVIL DRANINGS FOR ALL SITUFUNOUS SURFACES TO BE RE ED. b I - I S. INSTAL A 4' -0' NIGM TEMPORARY FENCE AROUND EXISTING TREES TO P ,SE �� PROTECT TMEFI FRO" DAMAGE, FENCE SHALL F0.LOM DRIP LINE OF Tar /(bDUDCI7jTT I HA TREES. LOT ALL EXISTING ENTRANCES AND ROADS THAT ARE TO BE REMOVED SMALL BE REPUTED BY NEN CURBS AND LANDSCAPINGAS PER CITY ,R,Fa.AA" , TW MVnc I IU �1E l ; A •6 . I. I f Ne-PARRIN \ \ I T, ON ON WE 1.1 oil ME -ij MEN �' p ar:0 I C ■ �, I. Yli li 1 1 Z. AND REPLACE CURBS 1 8r6 U' 9•-q 8328 S.F. ww LOT e66' X 13T-Q 1L70 S.F. I �x III To SLR PARKING SIGN 17 0 SENIOR PARKING r1ENIOR PARKING SIGN I� NOT TO SCALE e PARKING HANDICAP` STOP PARKIN ONL a HANDICAP ertwrm nvw: Pw. w rue w ro ve ACCESS •• 12• wieu Nn OXVrea AISLE NT . a rtunexw Tanroe rinem IN. Tea • e I /PPP ' T °•' T -T T FmT Opt e e rlAlom rae era ME . oaeNm ee • Mr ae.I® ease oTI..eY reGXARe Fe. r,1n.Pn PmXAI RAMP IN THE SIDEWALK pwryp IN THE SIDENALK r1CONR 3 Nor TCONCRETE A I A AM AI TD E SAN I EA AM AI ONA91 P G 61 —5-1 IGN GTB 4 TD E 5 E SCALE SCALE NOT TO SCALE nnc V R V C u eL Cr L .y.^ VI � C �— W •L Tushie V f� Montgomery Assoc. S Inc. Rj � rlu esceo..wr� b Dr,P.•e . SNU Novae 3300 EON+w o Way. •601 .12.830 -82 A6n FAX: SSe3B 612.630 -8208 FAX: B30-015 awm.,[C,IR.I ND DAL K[eeK I:..K3 wR r CTPreXKE NR M AeDe,iCT. AL O}AOI l- R K amTeOfl A'O a,I[exQ. AH N:e®Y rsnKRlY eE3TAVE6. SITE PLAN Oran By RK PTe•ecl McNleel Tr CNeckeE By TL, OT Del. 5•1 -e8 Ravieioro now R81000 O ■� p no My PFO ecl NR. L1.0 D 1— LLI Ld Cr r a uj 3 A A W 01 A ' SCALE 1'.40' -0' LANDSCAPE NOTES 1. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SMALL GUARANTEE ALL PLANT MATERIAL FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR FiiOt THE DATE OF INSTALLATION. ]. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SMALL MEET MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS 6MOWN IN THE 'AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSARY STOCK' (ANSI 210.1 -P ). S. NO PLANT MATERIAL SMALL BE SUBSTITUTED NITLWT AUTHORIZATION OF THE LAIN I! ARCHITECT. A. ALL DECIDUOUS TREES Wm! CALIPER OF 2 TO S INCHES SMALL BE STAKED; ALL DECIDUOUS TREES WITH CALIPER GREATER THAN ! INCHES SHALL BE GUTEDI EVERGREEN TREES GREATER THAN S FEET IN HEIGHT SHALL BE GUYED; STAKING AT HEIGHTS LESS THAN S FEET IS NOT NECESSARY. REFER TO PLAN AND DETAILS FOR SPECIFIC PLANTING INSTRUCTIONS. S. ALL TREES, SHRUBS AND GROUND COVERS SHALL BE MULCHED WITH AT LEAST A' SHREDDED BARK MULCH. !. IF DISCREPENCI95 EXIST BETWEEN THE QUANTITIES GIVEN ON THE PLANT L15T AND THOSE REPRESENTED GRAPHICALLY, THE GRAWIK REPRESENTATION SHALL TAKE PRECEDENCE. T. THE LANDSCAPE CO TRACTOR SHALL. VERIFY UTILITY LOCATION AND PROTECT ALL UTILITIES AND STRUCTURES. DAMAGE TO UTILITIES AND STRUCTURES SMALL BE REPAIRED BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER. S. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL STALE LOCATIONS OF PLANTS FOR LANDSCAPE AR0IITEGT5 APPROVAL BEFORE DIGGING MOLES. S. ALL AREAS WITHIN THE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION THAT HAVE BEEN DISTURBED SMALL RECEIVE SOD. 10. ALL LANDSCAPING SMALL BE IRRIGATED. RUBBER MDSE GUY W IRE9 (! PER TREE) f l..v Am r rYTIR GAeH.c TREE YORAP STEEL P05T7�XTURE MULCH ENTIEEP) G NM '� rLAnc oy REMOVE BURM TOP Hm I1b1 SPECIFIED SL MOUND OP CIL TO SUPPO RT TREE NOTES SIZE OF TREE PIT t9 BASED ON SIZE Amr e.0 OF BALL ANTING DETAIL M H AI 2 NO SCALE 3 NOS LE NORMANDALE ROAD I F-1 I I I I I I I I B tL3 X 8 51. iL32H f. �I — — NEW LaT�I br-6 X W-a T= S.F. I / �! TA1AYAOe um. enari a� PLANT 41ST W H K m V V V QY�N qaJ d V NAME QTY. BOTANICAL NAME IZE" = Ar CONIFEROUS TREES [.R! xAbc HaxS BPRLTJ! CQORADO GREEN 6o PYa al.fe s..+• GLEE .'.wY r -M ]' -H Y65 W W ITE FIR 1e AI.s rarals r -u DECIDUOUS TREES 'A,n,G..A SD M 6ERVKEHERNI' Arun nAPle ! a Ar.�bcly D+11;sv CI_W A� gv.vls O- a -v GLUT LLL AEA UTTLE LEAF L— AUTUMN BLAZE ASH T It Tl:. sema .vN.a P..rlrsa •ANVr.A BIm' !• !• • TC RO TW;NDERCNILD CRAB RED OAK 1 MNW 'TIV,/PWW' 1.6' t • • JTL ,APANNES'E TREE LILAC 12 Q�oa r.4Y 9'1- s.Yrfll. J.Fmlra 1 Tm RIVER BoHOH I s<Rw ,qe Y -u • • SHRUBS/PERENNULL CAC COMPACT AMERICAN 14 VibGwn VII.Wn Yinp.:Ia' 21 • P.M GRIJmCRRT BUSH P.,1 RHODWDIWQI m RMMMMw •PJT ]e' to • G9 TCLDFLMe SMREA •m S-- —"ca v:.una... D' to rs1 MOSS CANADA ULK •PNV . kl--- 4. to to MAMA HETZ MIDGET ARBORVITA N TINj..clP'I.I:.'H.H -kol' ]1' • • OL STELLA OE DRQ DATLILL L'A wIAI.sNW I Hpl S' O.0 PAVING EDGE- START SOD FLUSH WITH PAVING SOD ACROSS SLOPE NOT DOWN SLOPE MULCH (1' DEEP) REMOVE BURLAP /„A /,,, SEE EDGE OF ,S FROM TOP 1 % `� 1 MULCH DETAIL FINISH GRADE COMPACTED SUBGRADE SOL MIXTURE NOTE. NUCLEI LATER TO u� STAGGER SOD SO SEAMS 00 NOT LINE UP COVER ENTIRE BED AREA SOD ONLY DISTURBED AREAS AND VARY ENDING POINT TO PREVENT WASHOUTS N AI r1�.�D_pETAIL 4 NO SCALE NO SCALE S U L S V a � o _ N �L 5E N a C L 0— w N .L V Tushie Montgomery Associates Inc. wva DnyY,.. SINa 7700 Eci O,—gh Way. •601 M�nneapoGl. Af Bala 55475 612 - 670 -01208 FAX:870 -8215 WITCHER .IL AMi.i[CTWL Ab EYVEEIei o.At.q AH IN CWKK[ Ab IPI/.T4 •.T S Y.R n INg1T PROM ••TiE. OXOLN! IK .aaarzcT. Ions v mnvEOn Arm aie..rsl we: I[RfET m'EIrKNty axRVE•. P LM Dr— By RR Pro'ecl Architect TY Checked By TL. CT Data Revroons • eeTong -mom HO 119•10 tH'¢ to be URt Pro act No. L2.0 PLANNING COMISSION MINUTES APRIL 15 FEBRUARY 25 DRAFT MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION WEDNESDAY, APRIL 15, 1998 7:30 P.M., CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair, Gordon Johnson; Helen McClelland, Ann Swenson, David Byron, John Lonsbury, David Runyan, Geof Workinger, Charles Ingwalson and Lorelei Bergman STAFF PRESENT: Craig Larsen, Fran Hoffman, Jackie Hoogenakker I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: Commissioner Byron moved approval of the February 25, 1998, minutes with the following correction, remove ('but of the eight presented in the CPC booklet ") pg. 13. Commissioner McClelland seconded the motion. All vote aye; motion carried. II. OLD BUSINESS-'. C -98 -1 Conditional Use Permit Christ Presbyterian Church 6901 Normandale Road Building Expansion Proposal Chair Johnson addressed members of the Commission and audience informing them Mr. Larsen, Mr. Jarvis, and Mr. Brown are limited to 15 minutes for their presentation. After their presentations have been made Chair Johnson said he will ask for questions from the Commission, then open the hearing to the public. Chair Johnson said he would like each person to state their name, address, and limit their comments. Chair Johnson asked the audience to refrain from applause. Mr. Peter Jarvis, representing the proponent Christ Presbyterian Church and members of the Church development team were present. Mr. Brown, president of the Woodhill Neighborhood Association was present. Members of the Woodhill Neighborhood Association were present and supporters of the Church were present. DRAFT Mr. Larsen presented his staff report asking the Commission to note before them this evening are revised expansion plans. Mr. Larsen pointed out the revised site plan is similar to the original Option 3 plan.. The revised proposal presented this evening is the only proposal to be considered. Mr. Larsen explained for this proposal to be completed certain actions much occur. The revised proposal is subject to vacation of West 69'h Street, and the platting process (subdivision) for the proposed two lots. Mr. Larsen concluded the revised site plans retains the advantages offered by the plan originally supported by staff while offering some improvements. Mr. Larsen stated a Planning Commission recommendation for approval should be conditioned on: 1. Vacation of existing 691h Street right -of -way, and dedication of a new right -of -way as illustrated on the revised plan. 2. Developer's Agreement to cover construction of a new street. 3. All necessary permits from the Watershed District and MNDOT. 4. Modification of new curb cuts per recommendation of the Director of Public Works. Mr. Jarvis addressed the Commission informing them he believes the revised elu^ ;s an exciting new compromise. Continuing, Mr. Jarvis stated it was h.-rd to -et e w,jule -on exactly what the neighborhood desired. Mr. Jarvis said he men Brown, and the church also held another neighborhood meeting. At that meeting the design team concluded some members of the neighborhood objected to all 4 options, resulting in members of the design team sitting down and drafting a compromise plan. That plan is before you this evening. Mr. Jarvis asked the Commission to note the church spoke with the Marty family (6816 Brittany Road), and made an offer to purchase their home. That offer was accepted. This acquisition afforded the church the opportunity to create two new lots on West 691h Street. Mr. Jarvis acknowledged the church will have to come before the Commission and Council to subdivide these lots, but preliminary calculations indicate the proposed new lots meet neighborhood standards. Regarding West 691h Street, Mr. Jarvis explained the proposal now sifts the street less dramatically. Mr. Jarvis pointed out because of this realignment, and the acquisition of the Marty home there will be no loss of homes north of West 691h Street. Mr. Jarvis also informed the Commission the church will "get out of the rental property business, and sell the houses they currently rent after the landscaping of the church campus is completed. In closing, Mr. Jarvis opined the proposal before the Commission this evening has positive impact, and in his opinion an improvement over what exists today. Mr. Jarvis pointed out that, 1)there will be an increase in landscaping that will buffer the church expansion, and parking area from West 691h Street; 2)parking area will no longer be one large lot, it will be broken up with landscaped islands; 3)light wash will be reduced; 4)the church proposes no parking on West 691h Street, Brittany, Dunberry, West 70th Street, and the east side of the frontage road; 6)no house loss with the DRAFT construction of two new houses, and lastly; 7 the commitment to building 41� Y ) 9 on the proposed .new lots is a physical indicator the church does not want to move farther north. Mr. Brown addressed the Commission, and informed them he does not believe the revised proposal is a compromise. Mr. Brown stressed a number of members of the Woodhill neighborhood object to development north of West 691h Street that causes the removal of residential houses. Mr. Brown pointed out two residential lots will be lost as a result of expansion of the sanctuary, and in his opinion there is no guarantee the proposed two new lots will be sold, and built on. Continuing, Mr. Brown, pointed out there is no mention of safety regarding the change is plan. Another concern is the height of the proposed new steeple, it is extreme. Mr. Brown said he wants the Commission to know he believes, along with many others in the neighborhood that Christ Presbyterian Church is an asset to the community, and provides many useful services to the community, but what is lacking by neighborhood standards is trust. In the past, we the neighbors of Woodhill have heard many promises, and many of them have been broken. Mr. Brown inquired why Commission never questioned Mr. Jarvis on the church's other option plans. Continuing, Mr. Brown pointed out the Commission has only seen what the church has put before you, which is the four previously submitted options, and now, option 5. You as a body, have not been privy to the other ....options.- Mr. Brown asked-the Commission what message they will send to Council, Mr. 13(60`"ddm' mented if approved, in his opinion, a dangerous precedent is being -sent - to the Council for a vote. Concluding, Mr. Brown stated this has been a very difficult, exhausting time for him. He said he is embarrassed and ashamed of the way those in oppositior. to the expansion of Christ Presbyterian Church have been treated. A huge rift now exists in our neighborhood that was not there before, and is unnecessary. Mr. Brown concluded it has been very difficult to oppose this expansion. The association has tried to keep the focus on land -use, but it appears we have not accomplished that goal. Chair Johnson asked for questions, or comments from the Commission. At this time there were none. Chair Johnson opened the hearing to the public. Mr. Hamilton, 4805 West 70th Street stated he is opposed to the plan as presented, and this is the first time he has spoken before the Commission. Continuing, Mr. Hamilton explained he lives on the south side of West 70th Street (one of the four homes), and if the entrance /exit for the church on 70th is allowed to be moved farther east, his property will be negatively impacted. He pointed out not only will it be difficult to exit/enter his and others driveways, but because of the grade of the church property at this point during evening hours car lights will shine into the four homes as vehicles exit the site. Mr. Hamilton stated another concern of his is re -sale of his home. He pointed out that presently it is difficult getting into, and out of driveways for the four homes directly across from the church, and west of Arneson Acres, but the difficulty will 3 increase with the proposed expansion and eastward movement of the driveway. This could prevent potential home - buyers with children from purchasing any of these homes. Concluding, Mr. Hamilton said it is already difficult to market these homes. Mr. J. Stickney, 4812 Wilford Way, stated he moved to Edina in 1996, and is a member of CPC. He added his children are very active in CPC, and enjoy what it offers. He stated the proposed expansion has caused some disagreement in their household. He said his wife strongly supports the expansion, adding he wants to support option #5, but now has a concern. He pointed out at the last hearing he felt CPC was not planning on purchasing anymore residential homes, and now they have purchased the Marty home, and he stated he believes they have spoken with the Kovacks. Their home abuts church property on Normandale Road. Mr. Stickney said he wants CPC to stop purchasing residential homes. He has a concern that in the future Wilford Way may be pushed through. Concluding, Mr. Stickney stated he is concerned. Mr. Jarvis interjected he has no idea where Mr. Stickney got information that the church wants to purchase the Kovack home. Mr. Kovack, 6817 Normandale Road, said the church did not offer to purchase his home, but members of the design tea— d;c+ meet ?t his home to discuss the proposal „since in greatly impacts his prop,y Mr. Fred Little, 4725 Dunberry Lane, asked members of the Commission why no one asked members of the design team if they could review the other option plans the church indicated they considered. Mr. Little said to the best of his knowledge the church indicated at one there were eight plans, which they narrowed to four, and have now added a fifth.. Mr. Little reiterated not one Commission member challenged the church. Continuing, Mr. Little said this issue transcends the church plan. Mr. Little said the church has become a magnet church, and not the community church it used to be. Mr. Little pointed out less than 10% of the membership of Christ Presbyterian Church live in the 55435 zip zone, and this zip zone is the most impacted because of the proposed expansion. Concluding Mr. Little asked the Commission to restore faith in government, and deny the application for a conditional use permit. , Mr. Bob Smead, 6709 Southcrest Drive, said he is not a member of CPC, and thanked the active members of the Woodhill Neighborhood Association for their hard, and difficult task in opposing the expansion of a church. Continuing, Mr. Smead said he believes option #5 gives back to the neighborhood, and if the church does what it indicates it will do, he can support the proposed expansion. Concluding, Mr. Smead emphasized he wants to see homes constructed on the two proposed new lots, and the church to stop purchasing residential homes. Mr. Gary Thatcher, 6901 Southdale Road, said the church provides a fabric in the everyday life of many people that helps them grow spiritually, and in many other areas. He pointed out the church brings much to community. Concluding, Mr. Thatcher P 9 Y 9, said he supports the church in their expansion plans. Ms. Mitchell, 4809 West 66th Street, stated she is a member of CPC, and supports the expansion plans. Continuing, Ms. Mitchell said she believes option #5 addresses all concerns, such as parking, access, landscaping, etc. Ms. Mitchell pointed out 54% of the members of CPC live in Edina. Concluding Ms. Mitchell said if the church is allowed to freeze, and become stagnant,'the community will suffer. The church needs to grow. Ms. Vicki Dessinger, 4816 Wilford Way, stated she is not a member of CPC, and just purchased her home and was unaware of their plans for expansion. Ms. Dessinger said she does not support the proposal as presented. Ms. Dessinger said not only is the church relocating ,a street, it would appear construction of such a project would take many months. She pointed out this is something that has not been mentioned. The Woodhill neighborhood will have to live "under construction" for a long period of time. Ms. Dessinger said with all due respect she does not trust the church. She stated she has felt "talked down to ", and been treated badly for her opposition. She said the size of the parking lot is extreme, and she believes something creative could have been accomplished on the existing campus site without crossing West 691h Street. A ramp has been suggested, and there are other options out there. In Conclusion, Ms. Dessinger said the church has not given her any reason for'her to trust them, pointing out they have already purchased another home since the last meeting. Mr. Bill Hammer, 4709 Upper Terrace, said he does not understand where the feelings of animosity comes from. He added he is a member of the church. Mr. Hammer pointed out Edina is losing churches, and cannot afford to lose another one. Mr. Hammer noted traffic is terrible, it has been terrible on West 701h Street for years. Concluding Mr. Hammer asked the Commission to remember the majority of CPC members live in Edina. A resident at 4509 Laguna Drive, and member of CPC believes the church is an asset to the community, and supports their plans for expansion. Mr. Don Bark, 4807 West 701h Street said he has lived in the area for many years and is concerned with the removal of the older church owned house' on West 70 Street. He stated that house has been there for years, even before the church, and should be preserved. Continuing, Mr. Bark said he will be impacted because of the proposed easterly movement of the curb cut which will place the driveway in front of his home. Mr. Bark said in conclusion if the Commission feels this must be approved, please don't allow the curb cut to be moved to the east. Mr. Bark also asked them to consider a - - -- - ramp which -has been suggested time and time again. He said he understands at present ramps are not allowed, but can't that be changed in this instance. A ramp will fit nicely with the topography of the site. Parking could also be located underground. 5 Mr. Dean Knutson, 6900 Creston, stated he supports the expansion. Mr. Knutson said this is not only a land -use issue, it is more complex than that. Mr. Knutson stated he is a member of the church. He acknowledged traffic is an issue, but he does not feel the expansion of the church will impact traffic to a large degree. Concluding, Mr. Knuston said CPC brings value to the community as a whole. Ms. Peg Gallagher, 6812 Brittany Road, stated at the last hearing Mr. Jarvis said there will be no more purchasing of.residential properties, and now we have been informed the church purchased the Marty home. Ms. Gallagher said she does not want the church to march up the hill. The neighbors have no assurance the continuing acquisitions will cease. Ms. Penny Smith, 6600 West Shore Drive, said she is not a church member, and has received many mailings from the church regarding this issue., She added she has lived in the area for 27 years, and during the 27 years, neighbors usually have opposed what happens at the church. Ms. Smith stated her property values have increased in 27 years, and traffic has also increased, but not only because of church expansion. Ms. Smith stated many residents in the Woodhill neighborhood support the church, acknowledging this has been a difficult issue for all of us, on both sides. Ms. Smith concluded she does not oppose the plan for expansion. M&. U1—ar E—AG -5312 West 601h Street, said she is a member of Christ - Presbyterian Church, and considers the proposed expansion as a land -use issue.. She asked the Commission to note a church is a permitted conditional use in the R -1 district. Ms. Van Zommer stated during testimony she became concerned with the impact the proposed entrance /exit will have if moved to the east on the four homes directly across the street, but feels that issue can be resolved. Continuing, Ms. Van Zommer said she supports option #5, it is a good plan, and the best plan presented to date. Ms. Van Zommer pointed out there have been rumors Grace Church may leave Edina because there is no room to grow, and that is a real concern. She concluded cities need viable, healthy churches, and CPC adds a tremendous benefit to the community, and not only to those who worship there. Mr. McPheters, 4920 Poppy Lane, said he is a member of CPC and is also a member of the Woodhill Neighborhood Association. He said he believes a church is an investment to the community, and supports the expansion. Mr. Tim Murphy, #86 Woodland Circle, said he is an 8th grade youth minister at CPC, is a 12" grader at Breck School, and believes the proposed expansion is necessary, and good, from a youth perspective. Mr. Murphy explained CPC has an active, and growing youth group that meets in the evenings. The youth mission has been a great benefit to the youth of Edina. Mr. Murphy asked the Commission to note the majority of teens that are in the youth group are from Edina. Mr. Murphy asked for the support of the Commission in approving the expansion of both Phase I and II. 9 Ms. Wineberg, 6624 Brittany Road, told the Commission she loves her neighborhood, and does not want it to change, and she does not look forward to the future expansion proposal and construction time frame. She acknowledged the church does many good things, but so do most churches. Ms. Wineberg said the damage that will be done, will be done to this neighborhood. Ms. Wineberg said she believes it is good for the church to grow, but she added she believes there are other options regardless of what the church says. She suggested a ramp, and challenged why not a ramp. Mr. Castle, 6628 West Shore Drive, stated he is not a member of the church but views it as an asset to the community at large. He said this process has saddened him, it has torn neighbors apart. He stated he cannot understand the opposition. He pointed out a WalMart is not being constructed, a gun shop is not moving in. This is a church expansion, a city issue, and the whole city will benefit by the expansion of the church. Mr. Castle added he is very concerned with traffic, and the continued increase in traffic for those who use West 701h Street. He stressed this neighborhood needs some traffic relief from the city even if the city believes there is no problem, and 701h can handle the increase. Mr. Castle suggested more sidewalks. In conclusion Mr. Castle reiterated he supports the proposed expansion. Mr. Kovack, 6812_ Normandale Road, said he has attended all meetings here, and elsewhere, and is just too tired. He said West 69th Street needs to stay open. Mr. Kovack said the church has not been a good neighbor in maintaining their rental properties, and he suggested that the 3000 members participate in a spring cleanup, and cleanup the houses owned by the church. Mr. Grable, 4817 Wilford Way, said in her opinion the revised plan is a great improvement. He is in full support of the expansion plans. Ms. Shirley Rivert, 4913 Payton Court, said she does not believe there is a need for a larger sanctuary. She asked the Commission what guarantee the neighborhood has that the church will stop purchasing land, and stop marching up the hill if they continue to grow. Ms. Susan Irene, 4817 Dunberry Lane, said over the past 20 years she has witnessed many good things, and some bad. She said their have been many broken promises from the church, the gate was never erected, those who attend the bible study continue to spill over onto residential streets, etc. Ms. Irene stated she moved to the neighborhood because she loved it, and liked the idea of having a church in the neighborhood, but she never wanted that church to take over her neighborhood. Ms. Sandy Keane, 4813 Upper Terrace, explained she feels tired and weary, and her lovely neighborhood is missing its harmony. She pointed out, though many don't see it, that the Woodhill neighborhood continues to shrink as more traffic passes through it as a result of highway congestion, congestion on West 701h Street and France 7 Avenue. She said her neighborhood is stressed. She appealed to the. church to have more services so the congestion is disbursed. In conclusion, Ms. Keane said it has been very difficult to oppose this church. The focus has not been on land -use, it has been on the role of a church in a community. Chair. Johnson closed ,neighborhood comments and referred to the Commission for their questions, comments. Commissioner Ingwalson asked Mr Larsen how practical it is to limit parking. He said his concern is for the neighbors. If parking is limited on their streets, where will their visitors park? Mr. Larsen said Traffic Safety has found parking limitation signs can be regulated in a fair manner, and enforced. Members of the neighborhood will need to work with the Traffic Safety Committee, to find a solution that works. Mr. Larsen said restrictive parking on the north side of West 701h Street should not create a problem in front of the church, along with no parking posted on the south side. Commissioner . Ingwalson said in his experience people park where there is a door that is close, and in many instances that is the street. Mr. Larsen said the Traffic Safety Committee. will need to balance the residential use with the church and their activities. Commissioner McClelland suggested no parking Sunday am. Commissioner Swenson asked Mr. Hoffman what his U -9— Ong the four houses on the south side of West 701h street, and the impact they will feel if the curb cut is moved farther east. Mr. Hoffman said he has not studied that aspect of the proposal, but feels in either location, traffic will still need to be controlled during Sunday church services. Commissioner Swenson questioned if lights from the vehicles could create a nuisance. Mr. Hoffman said he agrees with that point, there will be a negative impact to the four homes from vehicle lights exiting the site as a result of the proposed easterly movement of the curb cut. Chairman Johnson suggested that the entrance /exit stay where it is. Mr. Hoffman commented that "maybe it should." Chairman Johnson asked Mr. Hoffman, if the curb cut could be moved farther west to reduce impact. Mr. Hoffman said because of the intersection of the frontage road and West 701h Street, the curb cut cannot be any closer to the intersection than it is today. Commissioner Byron stated he wants the curb cut on West 701h Street to stay where it is, and not move. Commissioner Workinger agreed, he said an easterly movement is not acceptable to him., Commissioner Runyan questioned how far West 691h Street is proposed to be moved north. Mr. Jarvis said the street at the east end will move about 85 feet, and around 150 feet on the west. `.l U Commissioner Runyan said in listening to all the comments presented this evening from both sides, he observed this has become a very emotional issue. Continuing, Commissioner Runyan said the role of city government is to listen to both parties, and act on what they feel is best for the neighborhood, and entire community. Commissioner Runyan said he feels option #5 is a good option, good compromise, and once the hardship of construction is over, and the church performs as it stated, the result may be better than what exists today. Commissioner Runyan added if the landscaping is increased as indicated, and two new homes are constructed, it will be an asset to the community in his opinion. Concluding, Commissioner Runyan stated in order for this to work he does believe the church has to honor the "promises" presented this evening. Mr. Steve Brown interjected for a number of Woodhill neighbors there is a line in the sand, and that line is West 691h Street. Mr. Kovack interjected for the record, that he would like the Commission to know members of the church spoke with him and promised a berm on his side of the property line, and the planting of coniferous trees. Mr. Javis responded that will be done. Commissioner McClelland stated she is upset the way the neighborhood has become divided regarding this proposal. Continuing, Commissioner McClelland reported she`tias received many letter from residents of the Woodhill neighborhood that do support the church, acknowledging the Commission has heard from many of them this evening. Commissioner McClelland pointed out Fire, Safety, Police, and City Staff indicated when they first reviewed the four presented options that 1 and 3 were best, and that is what the Commission would focus on. Now option #5 is supported by Fire, Safety, Police and Staff, and option #5 in her opinion makes good planning sense. Commissioner Byron commented he has been part of, and heard testimony on this issue for the better part of seven plus hours, and has come to the conclusion that all points of view are understandable, and well founded. Commissioner Byron acknowledged this issue has created much conflict in the differing points of view. Commissioner Byron stated he has resided in the 55435 zip zone for 22 years, and it is extremely threatening to any homeowner, regardless of where they live when a large red and white sign is posted on your block, across from you, or in your neighborhood indicating "something will change ". Commissioner Byron stated he has been there, he understands, and appreciates those who are in that position now. Continuing, Commissioner Byron said he believes the leadership on both sides of this issue should be applauded, they have done their best. Commissioner Byron said this has been a difficult and searching decision for him, and said that much to his own amazement that he was moving to recommend Conditional Use Permit approval subject to: 1)Vacation of- existing -691-h Street right -of -way, and dedication of a new right -of -way as illustrated on the revised plan (option #5); 2)Developer's Agreement to cover construction of the newly located West 691h street; 3)AII necessary permits from Nine Mile Watershed District, and MNDOT; 4)Modification of new curb cuts per recommendation of the . 9 � Director'of Pubic Works; 5)70" Street curb cut to remain as is, or be moved farther west at the discretion of the City Engineer.; 6)Subdivide and re -plat lots on West 69`h Street; 7)No portion of the proposed Phase II building plan can commence until the re- platted lots are sold with restrictive covenants Commissioner Bergman said this has been a very long and hard process for everyone, and her hope this evening was that the decision would have already been made, and agreed upon by both parties, so one side would not be upset with her decision when they left the building, but that was not the.case. Continuing, Commissioner Bergman said for her it came down to the big picture, and she views this expansion as "a healthy problem ". The Commission questioned aspects of the project at the first hearing, and the outcome from that hearing is a better project.. She asked the audience to believe this hearing process was also difficult for the Commission, and every member thought long and hard to come to their own conclusion. Commissioner Bergman added she hopes the neighborhood association and the church can work together in the future, and mend all bad feelings. Commissioner Bergman acknowledged CPC has not been as good a neighbor as it should have been, .and the church should clean up its property. Commissioner Ingwalson interjected he agrees with Commissioner Bergmans comments. He added he drove by the, church before the meeting this evening, drove down West 691h Street, and ay-a -6 -5 0h° e,-�.,cach-'should clean up their rental properties, and rebuild one fence he saw was down. Commissioner Ingwalson said it is time to "mend fences" and the church in regards to their properties should always "overdo ", not "underdo" which would be in the best interest of all parties. 10 %� %d00% �c 2 C -98 -1 Conditional Use Permit Christ Presbyterian Church 6901 Normandale Road Chairman Johnson introduced himself, and explained the order of discussion that will occur this evening. Chairman Johnson stated Mr. Larsen, City Planner, will present his staff report, and answer questions from the Commission. Mr. Jarvis, representing Christ Presbyterian Church, and Mr. Steve Brown, representing the Woodhill Neighborhood Association will then present their positions. Concluding, Chairman Johnson said he will move to close the hearing, allowing the Commission time to discuss the issue. The meeting will re -open for input from interested parties, and the decision making process. Commissioner Lonsbury addressed the Commission informing them he is a member of Christ Presbyterian Church, and as a member of the Church respectfully abstains from the discussion and vote. Mr. Larsen clarified formemhprs. -of tile,Commission, and members of the audience that the displayed "Rezoning", signs located on the properties of Christ Presbyterian Church are incorrect, and will be corrected to read "Conditional Use Permit ". Mr. Larsen presented his staff report. Commissioner Byron referred to Mr. Larsens comment that with the proposed expansion CPC will become the fifth largest Church in Edina, and asked Mr. Larsen how the City measures church size. Is it by the amount of land owned, the size of the church building, etc.? Mr. Larsen responded the City measures church size by the seating capacity of the sanctuary. Mrs. Polly Bowles introduced herself to the Commission as a member of Christ Presbyterian Church, and member of the steering committee. She informed the Commission in 1997 the Church made a decision to look into the feasibility of expanding. The committee discussed options of doing nothing, purchasing a satellite church, developing off -site home churches, maximizing the existing building site to stay in Edina, or build elsewhere. The steering committee after careful review decided to pursue expansion of the Edina campus. Mrs. Bowles stated she presently resides in Eden Prairie, but in the near future will be moving to her family home on Wilford Way, in Edina. Mr. Peter Jarvis addressed the Commission explaining he is a member of Christ Presbyterian Church, and is present this evening as a volunteer member of the design committee. Continuing, Mr. Jarvis said the design committee looked at a number of different scenarios, finally selecting four. Mr. Jarvis stated the four design concepts are before you this evening. Mr. Jarvis pointed out City staff has indicated out of the four options they support option #3. Mr. Jarvis concluded before you this evening are expansion plans that have been drafted to accomplish the needs of the Church into the next millennium. With the support of graphics Mr. Jarvis pointed out the proposed landscaping, and screening plans. Mr. Jarvis stated one goal of the design committee is to reduce the impact of the parking lot from neighboring residential properties. Mr. Jarvis said the Church wants to be a good neighbor, and does not want the parking lot to become an eyesore. Mr. Jarvis said positive points to be considered regarding the four option proposals are 1)an increase in landscaping, 2)constructing islands in the parking areas, and adding landscaping to those islands, 3) all Church grounds will be irrigated, 4) all parking demands will be met on site, 5) the elimination of parking along West 70` Street, and, 6) light standards will be lowered to 19'6" which will eliminate "light wash" into the neighborhood. Concluding Mr. Jarvis opined he believes the Church has been blessed with an excellent location for expansion. He pointed out the Church is hordPrPd by Highway 100 and West 701h Street , which are both major intersection-- Mr. Jarvis introduced Mr. Jim Benshoof, of Benshoof & Associates, Inc., a transportation engineer. Mr. Benshoof addressed the Commission, and explained by his calculations option #2 substantially reduces vehicle traffic flow into the neighborhood, and acknowledged City staff opted for option #3. Continuing, Mr. Benshoof said the traffic study found with the proposed addition that traffic volumes would remain within the 1,000 per day threshold, which is recognized as a traffic standard measure for residential streets. Mr. Benshoof pointed out the Church's principal driveway will continue to be located on West 70`h Street. The West 70th Street driveway will be upgraded to accommodate traffic lane alignments and widths, and a police officer will continue to provide traffic control during peak Church use periods. In conclusion, Mr. Benshoff stated in his opinion all four Church expansion options reduce and /or eliminate on- street parking, and the neighborhood would gain a benefit from the existing conditions through the prohibition of on- street parking on neighborhood streets by Church users. Mr. Jarvis re- addressed the Commission noting many studies have been conducted regarding landuse, and landuse as service based, and if one were to ask a cross - section of people what they look for, and desire in a neighborhood, research indicates from a residential standpoint that the answers usually are the same; good schools, parks, and churches. Not the gas station down the block, the nearest Starbucks, or shopping centers, etc. It's schools, parks, churches, in varying order 9 depending on the individual asked. Mr. Jarvis pointed out Edina has forever been marketed as a community with great schools, great parks, and a variety of great churches. Mr. Jarvis said he believes CPC is an asset to this community, and it is healthy, growing, and provides great value to the community. A healthy growing church reflects a healthy community. Mr. Jarvis stated the proposed expansion phases I and II will help the Church accomplish its goals and mission. Mr. Jarvis commented that ultimately communities will decide if an institution such as this, benefit the community, because like schools, and universities, churches do not pay taxes. Continuing, Mr. Jarvis said he believes as a result of the proposed expansion the benefits to the City and community are numerous. He pointed out when one looks at the history of the Church the sanctuary has not been enlarged since 1968, and to accommodate the growth of the Church, enlargement is needed. Mr. Jarvis said the Church does not anticipate plans for expansion in the foreseeable future, and if one is realistic when discussing churches, churches of the 1990's are very different from churches of the 1950's. Churches now provide many outreach services, with youth and adult educational services, etc.. Mr. Jarvis asked the Commission to note one of the very successful services provided by CPC is their Wednesday evening youth program, and 70% of the youth that attend this program are Edina residents, and not all the youths are members of CPC. Mr. Jarvis pointed out in 1957 the Church was constructed with sanctuary capacity of 200, and in 1968 the current sanctuary and Fellowship Hall were constructed creating seating capacity of under 500. Mr. Jarvis said he believes th four proposal options offer the following:. 1)allows on- off-site functionality 2) visual enhancements, noting the landmark nature of the Church steeple 3) City enhancements with private funds, and 4) enhanced City landmark. Mr. Jarvis stressed it has been 30 years since. the Church has asked for an increase in sanctuary seating, and lastly, Mr. Jarvis asked the Commission to consider that in the mid- 1970's MNDOT took approximately 1.3 acres of the original Church campus, and with current acquisitions the campus is now larger than it was originally. Chairman Johnson asked for a 10 minute recess. Mr. Steven Brown, 6624 Southcrest Drive, introduced himself to the Commission as President of the Woodhill Neighborhood Association. He told the Commission with all due respect the issue presented this evening is not a religious issue, it is a landuse issue. Continuing, Mr. Brown informed the Commission the Woodhill Homeowners Association was founded in 1958, and is still active today. The Association works very hard to create the feeling of "community ". In April of 1997 the Woodhill Association held an open meeting, and 12 residents were elected as members of the Association. Mr. Brown stated there have been attempts made by the Association to open a dialogue with the Church to explore other developmental options. The Church held a neighborhood meeting, much like the one this evening, and members of the neighborhood were informed of the four option plans. Mr. Brown stated the neighborhood wants to work with the Church, but also would like the Church to consider the other options noted it their booklet. The closing of West 69th Street has impact, and the removal of residential homes, to be replaced with parking area is difficult to take. 7 Mr. Brown pointed out the name of the association "Woodhill" has a reason. The neighborhood is constructed on a hill, and much of the residential properties overlook the Church. The introduction of more asphalt is an important fact. Continuing, Mr. Brown said the Association has tried to contact members of the design team, but to date it has been difficult for both parties to connect. Mr. Brown said the neighborhood has been reacting to expansion rumors. Mr. Brown told Commission members he sent a letter to Mr. Jarvis and Mr. Crosby indicating the Association opposes the four expansion options. Mr. Brown stressed he feels he is in a difficult position opposing expansion of a church, but he is no different from any man in this building (pro or con). He is a father, husband, son, etc., who recently has been away quite a bit from his family as a result of the proposed expansion. Mr. Brown opined this issue did not have to come to this, he acknowledged there is a feeling of animosity between both sides that could have been avoided if communication was present. Mr. Brown pointed out this is not a battle that is new. He stated he has a very real concern the proposed expansion may not be enough, and may not satisfy the growth of the Church. He pointed out Grace church on France Avenue experienced tremendous growth, and also purchased a number of homes, now that church, even with the large expansion, (which resulted in the removal of residential homes) has outgrown the site, and will be moving to Eden .Prairie. Mr. Brown posed the question, what will happen to the Church site if the growth pattern exceeds the proposed expansion options, will the Church purchase more residential property,.or move, and leave behind an empty; church? In conclusion, Mr. Brown said he realizes all questions cannot=u r u. cu;=,vu`the questions and concerns raised are relevant. Ms. Colleen Gallagher, 6812 Brittany Road, told the Commission the neighborhood has been before this body almost every 10 years since the Church was first constructed in 1957. Ms. Gallagher acknowledged Mr. Jarvis touched on some of the expansion history of the Church, but the neighborhood believes the Commission needs to hear their point of view regarding the past and proposed expansions. Continuing, Ms. Gallagher said in 1968 the Church petitioned for their first expansion, with no objection from the neighborhood. In 1973 (this was probably the first time the Commission heard concerns from the neighborhood) a developer petitioned to subdivide a group of lots in the neighborhood, and the developer deeded two residential lots to CPC. The Church accepted those lots subject to the condition that the lots were to remain residential. In response to complaints from the neighborhood to the City that the lots were not properly cared for (mowed, kept free of refuse) the Church removed a majority of the large Oaks on the lots, which created some bad feelings. Continuing, Ms. Gallagher stated in 1978 the Church attempted to cross West 691h Street, and construct a parking lot, and the headlines of the Sun - Current read the "Neighbors were Irked ", In 1998, the Sun - Current stated the "Neighbors were Vexed ". Ms. Gallgher asked the Commission to note 20 years ago her father stood before the Commission, and now she stands before the Commission. Ms. Gallagher referred to the comment made by Mr. Jarvis that in the mid- 1970's MNDOT took approximately 1.3 acres of CPC's original property. Ms. Gallagher pointed out the Church is not the only property owner that lost property. The residents along Normandale Road lost property , and the N access to West 66'h Street was closed, which resulted in more traffic on West 701h Street, more traffic for the Woodhill neighborhood. Normandale Road also became a one way which used to. be a two -way, which resulted in a very real impact. Continuing, Ms. Gallagher told the Commission in 1989 the Church undertook a large addition, and informed the Commission, Council, and members of the neighborhood the Church anticipates member growth to be 40 to 60 members a year, or a 2% growth. (that growth has been. increased). On July 24, 1989. the Council approved the expansion with conditions, including a planned parking agreement, which is in place today. Ms. Gallagher asked the Commission to note the neighborhood is before you this evening with the same issues. She reported in 1991 if the Commission recalls the Church petitioned to once again cross West 691h Street, this issue was denied by the Commission. Ms. Gallagher stressed the neighbors relied on the action of the Planning Commission, and expected nothing further to happen regarding the option of the Church crossing West 691h Street. She pointed out the Planning Commission minutes reflect opposition to the Church's attempt to cross West 691h Street , especially from Commissioner Faust and McClelland. Ms. Gallagher believed the Church heard the "message" from the Commission, and neighbors felt it was made crystal clear the Commission did not want to see the Church cross West 691h Street. Ms. Gallagher concluded the neighborhood respects the right of the Church to request this addition, but members of the Woodhill neighborhood want you to respect their right to fight it. This is our neighborhood, our homes, our property. values ,, and .inoreased traffic that this neighborhood has to live with` everyday. The Woodhill neighborhood is impacted by what the Church does. Mr. Fred Little, 4725 Dunberry Lane, submitted to the Chair a petition with 286 signatures in opposition to the proposed Church expansion. Continuing, Mr. Little stressed the mission of Christ Presbyterian Church is shared by many people in this room. Many people in the Woodhill neighborhood go to their place of worship every Sunday, and their ideals and values mirror those .of CPC. We are not in opposition to the merits of the Church. This is strictly an opposition to the expansion of their campus. Mr. Little stated he wants that stressed. The opposition is only a landuse issue, not a stand against what this Church or any Church represents. Mr. Little stated he is working under the premise the Commission received a booklet outlining the Church's proposals. Mr. Little acknowledged it must be very difficult to digest everything this booklet presented. Mr. Little said he is confused, because if he understands correctly CPC references eight options, not four, and he would like more information on the four options CPC asked the Commission to dismiss. Mr. Little said it is Important to him to clarify the core issue, which is landuse. No one can deny that CPC has been a very successful Church by anyone's measurements. They are a Church with tremendous resources, and the neighborhood association is a grass roots organization without a budget. Mr. Little acknowledged the programs offered by the Church are very well received in Edina, and the Church should be complimented. CPC has grown - tremendously, and the Church is now asking the neighborhood to accept their changes. Mr. Little pointed out that we, as neighbors, are not requesting anything, we only want our neighborhood to continue to be the safe, quite, peaceful residential neighborhood 9 we bought into. Mr. Little opined the Church is now at a crossroads with a very . dynamic minister. Mr. Little said the Church should be congratulated because it has so much going for it, but how their growth is managed directly impacts the residents of the area. Mr. Little stated with all due respect the neighborhood is not concerned with the .growth problems of the Church. He pointed out this is our neighborhood, our homes, . and we respectfully remind the Commission even if the Church is located in this neighborhood the homeowners of the Woodhill neighborhood should not have subjugate their values and needs because this Church is experiencing growth. Mr. Little stressed the neighborhood regrets this has become an adversarial issue. He asked the Commission to believe residents of neighborhood are not opposed to the mission of the Church, the neighborhood believes the Church is an asset to Edina, and ' will not argue that point, but the residents of the area want to work with the Church to create the best solution possible to their growth. Mr. Little said he feels badly that at best this process is adversarial, and in his opinion not a very good process, It pits neighbor against neighbor. He concluded that bigger is not necessarily,better, the Church has become a magnet Church, with 57 -58 different groups using this facility. Mr. Little asked the Commission to get to the root of the matter, which is in his opinion is land use, and the fact that no one knows what will happen in 2005. 'it is difficult to attach a confidence level to traffic engineers and their projections, because when one talk s statistics, it is a guess. In conclusion Mr. Little said he resents the analysis that states traffic will .be..at acceptaNe levels.. With graphics Mr. Little pointed out am analysis of Churc:-T, ;: 97 the Church maintained they have 3000 members, .:.-.F and if growth is projected into the year 2004, and if growth remains the same as the past few years, growth will be 5 -7% a year which will be membership of 4000 +. Mr. Little said he is not quibbling with growth projections, but is dealing with the potential magnitude of growth, and the possibility of what the Church is requesting this evening may not be enough. Mrs. Carla Sitek, 4508 Balfanz, informed Commission members she has four children that attend Cornelia School, and her family has lived in the neighborhood for a number of years and has seen a marked increase in traffic on West 701h Street, especially over the past three years. She added many parents who live north of West 701h Street drive their children to school because of the traffic on West 70" Street. Mrs: Sitek told the Commission she is now on the task force at Cornelia School to try to find a solution to the traffic, and safety for the children who go to school there. The expansion of the Church will add traffic to already loaded streets, and when West 70`h Street is overloaded vehicles cut through the neighborhood. With all due respect, Mrs. Sitek concluded she grew up in Edina and cannot believe the Commission would consider allowing a Church to raze four houses for a parking lot. Ms. Carrico, 4816 Roycar, told the Commission there is no neighborhood park except for Cornelia or Cornelia school which results in our children having to.cross two very busy streets. Continuing, she said the parking lot is also an issue because of the increase in its size. She pointed out there will be a safety issue with a lot this size because all parts of the lot are not visible from the streets, and certain areas will remain 10 dark. Ms. Carrico stated the Woodhill neighborhood is a beautiful residential neighborhood, and through no fault of its own has become surrounded by major streets. She pointed out when the traffic was divided evenly to gain access to the Southdale area between West 66 and West 701h Streets getting out of the neighborhood was manageable, but when Highway 100 was expanded, and access was eliminated from West 66' Street, West 701h Street became the central collector, and is very busy. France Avenue is also a very busy road. The proposed increase in Church membership will only add more cars on residential streets every day of the week. Ms. Carrico concluded the neighborhood is seeking some relief, and is looking to the Commission to provide that relief. Ms. Sandy Keane, 4813 Upper Terrace, told the Commission when she was young she lived is south Minneapolis, and as her family grew they realized they would have to leave their home to accommodate their growth. As a family unit they never considered asking their neighbors if they could purchase their property so they could remain in their home and expand. Continuing, she stated the Church family may be experiencing the same growing pains her family did, but instead of moving to a location that will accommodate their growth they have decided to buy up their neighbors property to construct a larger sanctuary and put up a parking lot. Ms. Carol Kaiser - Myland; 4800 West 701h Street, informed the Commission she lives two doors fronn -the Church property on West 70" Street. She'said the Church has experienced wonderful growth, but the property owners along West 701h Street are already overburdened with the traffic situation as it exists today. Ms. Myland asked the Commission to take into consideration when they make their decision the increased traffic on West 70th Street, and the impact this expansion will have on the lives of residents on West 70th Street, and the streets that load on to it. Mr. Brown, thanked the Commission for their patience during the presentations of members of the Woodhill neighborhood. Chairman Johnson asked the Commission at this time if they had any questions for the developer or neighborhood association members. Commissioner Byron asked Mr. Jarvis the drivers for Phase II of their proposal. Mr. Jarvis said it is projected Phase II will be constructed in 5 to 7 tears to accommodate the increase in enrollment in adult and youth education. Commissioner Byron asked what the present enrollment is. Mr. Jarvis deferred to Ms. Sue Payne who is in charge of youth activities. Ms. Payne said approximately 700 youths participate in the youth program. Adult education has been difficult to assess because of its location off the Church campus site, and enrollment in that program has suffered as a result. 11 Commissioner Byron asked if it is the hope of the Church that adult education will increase as a result of the proposed expansion. Ms. Payne said the hope is to be able for all Church members to meet at one location for worship, and continuing education. She concluded incorporating adult education on the campus will increase adult attendance. Chairman Johnson noted it appears the Church favors option #1, and staff has indicated their preference for option #3. He asked Mr. Jarvis if the Church considers all options on the floor or only options #1 and #3. Mr. Jarvis responded the Church at this time considers all four options on the floor. All four options accommodate the needs of the Church, but #1 and #3 appear to be the most viable. Commissioner Swenson interjected and questioned Mr. Jarvis if they ever considered other options for the parking lot, such as a ramp. Mr. Jarvis said in the summer of 1996 the Church hired two consultants to evaluate the feasibility of a two level ramp. It was recalled at one of the previous Commission hearings a ramp was suggested. The Church design committee also discussed a ramp option, but found a ramp is not allowed in the R -1 district. Mr. Jarvis divulged the Church would prefer no ramp because a ramp is very expensive. Commissioner Swenson said she realizes a ramp is not allowed in an R -1 uist„c:. but it is possible a ramp would be less intrusive to the neighborhood. Mr. VIS acknowledged busing members from off -site parking has been difficult, but the ramp was too expensive to consider further. Commissioner Byron noted in all four option plans it appears the entrance /exit has been moved farther to the east. Is this to help facilitate stacking. Mr. Jarvis said that is correct. Commissioner Byron said he travels West 701h Street every Sunday to attend his Church, and it appears to him if the entrance is moved, the road at that point narrows. Mr. Jarvis said the Church will recommend that all parking on the north side of West 70`h Street be eliminated. This should open up additional opportunities for stripping, and a protected left turn lane. Commissioner Byron asked about the ingress /egress on the southside of West 701h Street. Mr. Jarvis said with respect to Sunday mornings, Tuesday Bible study, and Wednesday evenings, the southside should operate as it is today. Mr. Brown interjected, and pointed out there is only one access into the Church parking lot, and two exits. He noted with the proposed expansion, in his opinion congestion will be created because of one entrance. Chairman Johnson motioned to close the hearing to allow the Commission time to discuss the options, and focus on what the Commission prefers. Commissioner Workinger stated this issue is very perplexing to him. He said he does not really know how usual it is for the Commission to review four options, but in 12 his opinion the Church should sit down with their neighbors, and try to work out a compromise solution. Commissioner Workinger said he realizes the Church wants resolution on this matter, but he believes it is an imposition for this panel to react to all four options when the impacted neighbors, and the Church appear not to be able to resolve their differences, and come to a reasonable solution. Commissioner Workinger said at this time he is just coming short of recommending that this issue be tabled. Chairman Johnson asked the Commission if they want to continue this discussion, and choose one option or reduce the options for discussion purposes. Commissioner Swenson pointed out it may be possible members of the Commission do not support any of the proposed four options. Commissioner McClelland said in her opinion the Church has presented four different options, which allows flexibility in choice, close off the neighborhood, or keep it open. Continuing, she pointed out City staff has indicated support for option #3, the Church #1, and the Fire Department indicated they recommend maintaining access through the parking area to accommodate emergency vehicles as well as Church traffic during peak usage periods. Commissioner McClelland concluded she is not adverse to eliminating #2 and #4 from discussion. Commissioner Workinger said if one looks at the position,of the Fire.Departmen options #1 and #3 are the only viable options because they provide access for emergency vehicles. Commissioner Workinger said he believes there are also other alternatives that could be developed. Commissioner McClelland said she agrees there could be other design options out there; but she added she was only focusing on the options presented. A discussion ensued between Commission members on the four options proposed by the Church, with no conclusion. Commissioner Swenson moved to recommend denial of all four options. Commissioner Workinger seconded the motion. Commissioner Byron interjected he would like to hear more from the neighbors on the option(s) that they may favor. Further discussion ensued with Commissioner McClelland stating while she understands the difficulty of the issue, she reiterated she has not heard anything positive from the Woodhill neighborhood, or their choice from the four.options presented. Commissioner Workinger reiterated in his opinion it is difficult to be put in the position of having to decide between four options, adding he does not feel he has had ample time to study, and digest what has been presented. Continuing, Commissioner 13 Workinger said he would have appreciated it if the Church would have presented one option, and one option only. Commissioner Swenson reiterated it is possible a number of Commissioners do not favor any of the four options proposed by the Church, and feel the Church can do a better job addressing the concerns of the neighborhood. Blocking off, and /or relocating a street, is an important issue for any neighborhood, adding to the equation that residential houses are proposed to be razed is difficult. Commissioner Swenson said she believes there are other design alternatives out there, besides the four presented this evening, which would accomplish what the Church desires, and not compromise the integrity of the neighborhood. Chairman Johnson interjected while it is difficult to discuss four options the Commission should decide on an option they feel is best. The Commission also has the option of supporting the staff position of option,43. Chairman Johnson suggested the possibility of tabling the issue allowing both sides to communicate. Commissioner McClelland agreed, reiterating the Commission has not heard any positive feedback, or solutions from the Woodhill Neighborhood Association, or anything from supporters of the Church, (and supporters appear to be in the audience) except for the presenters of the project: An unidentified man stated "We came this evening for a decision ", and to table this is grossly unfair to everyone here. The people who care, came here tonight, and feel the Commission owes us an answer. Chairman Johnson said he does not agree, the Commission is here to listen to all sides, and to come up with the best solution. Sometimes the decision takes extra time, and requires more information. Commissioner Workinger withdrew his second. Commissioner Swenson withdrew her motion for denial. Chairman Johnson re- opened the hearing. Mr. John Hoyt, 4812 Dunberry Lane, told Commission members he has conducted studies of how the parking lot at CPC is used. He added he believes even with the increase in parking lot size Church members will still use the street because it affords the closest location to the Church doors. Mr. Hoyt said when he drove by the lot in the morning there were six cars in the parking lot, and. 13 cars parked on West 69" Street. Mr. Hoyt pointed out habits are hard to break, suggesting signage may alleviate on- street parking problems. Mr. Jarvis interjected it may be a good idea to request "No Parking" signs in areas other than on West 701h Street. 11151 Mr. Brown asked Mr. Jarvis if the Church ever considered moving the entrance to the Church. Mr. Jarvis responded the main access to the Church will continue to be from West 701h Street. Commissioner Workinger said he has a problem with all four options. Commissioner Bergman interjected she cannot support options #1, #2, and #4. Commissioner Byron stated in his opinion both sides have presented their positions very well, and he complimented them on their excellent presentations. Commissioner Byron said even though the presentations have been superior he is not ready to recommend a favorble vote on any of the four options presented this evening. Commissioner Byron moved to recommend denial of the Conditional Use Permit. Commissioner Swenson seconded the motion. Commissioner Workinger said he does not believe a vote for, or against, will make it on the floor, and suggested tabling the issue. Mr. Jarvis interjected the Church would not object to a continuance- Commissioner Byron stated he would be pleased to withdraw his motion to deny. Commissioner Swenson withdrew her second. She added she is not adverse to tabling this issue. Commissioner McClelland moved to table the request for a Conditional Use Permit for Christ Presbyterian Church until the Planning Commission meeting of April 1, 1998. Commissioner Bergman seconded the motion. Ayes; Byron, Swenson, McClelland, Workinger, Bergman Johnson. Abstain, Lonsbury. It was mentioned that April 1St falls during Edina's Spring break which could result in difficulties for residents who may have planned a trip, and desire to attend the regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting. III. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 12:15 A.M. Jackie Hoogenakker 15 CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED AFTER PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 15, 1998 5800 Long Brake Trail Edina, MN 55439 April 9, 1998 Mayor Smith Edina City Council Members Chairman Johnson Edina Planning Commission Members City of Edina Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Smith, Council Members, Chairman Johnson and Commission Members: We are writing on behalf of Christ Presbyterian Church's request for approval to expand their facilities. One of the big factors in helping us decide to move to Edina in 1988 was Christ Presbyterian Church. We attended our first Sunday while here in Minnesota to house hunt. In addition to the Edina School system, location and great facilities, we were very happy to have found what we planned would be our new church .home. We have not been disappointed. We joined the church in 1989 while it was going through an expansion and without a senior minister at the helm. This said something was special about CPC. Here was a church which had a strong enough lay leadership to move forward with robust plans. It wasn't long before we as a family were all involved in some capacity or another. Jim was very involved in the entire long range planning process which included with Session, our ruling body of the church, debating the pros and cons of what we should do about our growth. After a long and exhaustive study, the plan to expand on this site was reached. Contrary to the neighborhood accusation. this decision was made ONLY after every other option was discussed, debated fully and rejected as not being faithful to our mission statement. Jan had the opportunity to sit in on the initial neighborhood meetings. With all due respect to Mr. Steven Brown of the Woodhill Neighborhood Association, he was NOT there to hear this discussion. Mrs. Polly Bowles led the meetings and listened to the array of concerns, fears, accusations of past promises and requests. Jan remembers very clearly that three concerns voiced by those present were: keep 69th Street open, don't close off neighborhood access through the church parking lot to 70th Street, and improve the landscaping. Christ Presbyterian Church, although on the perimeter of Woodhill neighborhood, is a community church with membership from all over the city as well as surrounding communities. Attendees do not have to drive through the neighborhood as is necessary with St. Patrick's, Good Samaritan. St. Stephen's and Grace. Adequate parking will also prevent parking along neighborhood streets. We could understand the neighborhood concern about traffic if church location was in the middle of the neighborhood. We could understand neighborhood concern if attendees used the church during the time children walked to school. The fact is, Christ Presbyterian Church's peak times are Sunday mornings, Tuesday mornings after children are in school and Wednesday afternoons after children are home. Also, use of the land as a nicely landscaped church will continue to be a wonderful, effective buffer between the industrial areas west of Highway 100 and the Woodhill neighborhood. We believe that Christ Presbyterian's plan number 5 does indeed address the initial concerns expressed by neighbors and meets the later requests of the neighbors to not remove houses. It is, by far, the best plan put forth by the church with the neighborhood in mind. We hope that you will look favorably on it and approve it. Sincerely. Janet S. Doudiet i r James T. Doudiet Kurt W. Smith 6600 West Shore Drive Edina, MN 55435 Mayor Smith and Members of the Council Chairman Johnson and Members of the Commission C/O Craig Larson City Planner Edina Citv Hall 4801 West 50`h Street Edina, MN 55434 -1394 April 12, 1998 RE: Christ Presbyterian Church's Proposed Expansion Dear Mayor Smith and Members of the Council and Chairman Johnson and Members of the Planning Commission: I want to applaud the decision made by the Edina Planning Commission at the February 25 meeting to defer the remaining discussion and decision regarding the four plans submitted by Christ Presbyterian. I believe that it was a very prudent action by the Planning Commission to defer the decision on which of the four alternative plans should be approved and to direct the church and its neighbors to seek a compromise. My wife and I are long term residents of the Woodhill neighborhood. We are not members of Christ Presbyterian but do frequently attend the services and other events at the church. We have always felt that the church and its programs have been a significant asset to the community and the neighborhood. We have been supportive of the expansion of the church campus because it addresses numerous concerns that we have had with the present site configuration. The present site plan does not provide adequate on -site parking and results in overflow on -street parking that causes serious on -street congestion. Furthermore. the present campus has inadequate green space resulting inadequate screening and unsightly exposure of the asphalt parking lot to the neighborhood. We feel that the church has made a sincere effort to reach a compromise in its latest plan. It has met our concerns and has met most of the neighborhood concerns to the best of their ability. The meeting between the Woodhill Board and the church after the February 25'h meeting brought about a focus on the five central issues. The issues as I understand them are, 1. the relocation of 69'h Street north and removal of houses. 2. the replacement of green space with asphalt, 3. the future expansion and incursion into the neighborhood, 4. the traffic and safety, and 5. the size of the church and steeple. I believe that the new compromise plan developed by the church along with the earlier reduction in building size have addressed all of the issues. The relocation of 691h Street in its new form minimizes the incursion into the neighborhood, and the creation of the new street and erection of new homes would make a future expansion prohibitively expense. The plan effectively shifts the green space from the north side of 691h Street into the parking lot where it serves to better screen the site from the neighborhood. The plan addresses the safety of pedestrians forced to walk in the middle of the street by the excessive on -street parking. The loss of 1.3 acres of the original campus for the Highway 100 expansion has been a contributing factor to the overcrowding of the site. Now, I feel that it is reasonable that the community permit the church to expand on the land that it owns across the street. Furthermore, since the zoning code does not permit ramp parking or a non - contiguous parking arrangement, the annexation of the land necessitates the relocation of 69'h Street. I think that the straight street in the compromise plan is the most practical design. It involves a minimum penetration into the neighborhood and the minimum impact on housing stock. It is very sensitive to the concerns of the neighborhood. I am writing this letter to each of you because the Woodhill Association has indicated that they will not represent those neighbors who support the plan. It is their position that we are a small minority. It is my sense that the neighborhood is more supportive than has been evident. A recent canvas of 20 homes on West Shore Drive from 66'h Street to Balfanz Road not including a Council member's home revealed that 95% of the households were supportive of the expansion or were neutral. The majority were supportive, but have not wanted to become involved. This canvas has been documented in writing and has been given to the church. Since the Woodhill Association will not represent the neighbors who are supportive of the expansion plan, I hope that the next planning meeting will provide a forum for broader discussion. I believe that the church has made a good faith effort to meet the concerns of the neighborhood, and that the neighbors who are in favor of the expansion plan should be given an equal opportunity to speak. S' cerely, , (� Kurt W mith Debra Raphael Castle Robert C. Castle 6628 West Shore Drive Edina, MN 55435 (612) 925-7831 April 10, 1998 VIA MESSENGER Mayor Glenn Smith Edina City Council City Hall 4801 W. 50" Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: Support for Christ Presbyterian Church's Proposed Expansion Dear Mayor Smith and Members of the Council: Our family lives on the 6600 block of West Shore Drive. Although we are not members of Christ Presbyterian Church, we are concerned about, disappointed by and frankly saddened by the controversy which has surrounded the Church's proposed expansion. At a time when communities face so many challenges, we would hope that a community like ours would view the expansion of a vibrant church which contributes to our community's secular as well as spiritual qualities, as an opportunity to rally around instead of to oppose. We would also ask that the City Council dismiss the "Woodhill Association" as a purported representative of our neighborhood. That "Association" appears to be a committee of convenience dominated by individuals who are using the "Association" as a vehicle for advancing their personal opposition to the Church's expansion. The Edina City Council and Edina Planning Commission are the appropriate venues for the resolution of this issue. Please do not be misled regarding the legitimacy of the "Association ", or the degree to which it really represents the "majority view" of our neighborhood. The arguments and facts in support of the Church's expansion are numerous and we believe have already been extensively represented to the City Council. We will therefore not reiterate those in their entirety, but rather will highlight what for us are compelling considerations regarding this issue: We do not believe that the traffic issues in our neighborhood will be meaningfully exacerbated by the expansion of the Church. The problems with traffic on our street are a function of a lack of sidewalks, stop signs, and a need for increased enforcement of speed limits. We believe that objections based upon purported traffic concerns are in reality nothing more than the proverbial red herring. Our Mayor Glenn Smith Edina City Council April 10, 1998 Page 2 concerns about traffic on West Shore Drive can be best addressed through sidewalks and stop signs, not restricting the Church's expansion; 2. We believe that the Church has attempted to accommodate concerns of the neighborhood. We understand that the Church has reconfigured its proposed building, as well as related parking. Unfortunately, it appears that the "Woodhill Association" is unwilling to acknowledge the Church's efforts, and in fact appears determined to discount and misrepresent those efforts; 3'. We believe that the Church offers an important, attractive venue for secular neighborhood activities, and therefore contributes to the quality of our neighborhood and larger community; 4. Those who oppose the Church's expansion want 69 "' Street to become a barrier to expansion. That appears to'be an arbitrarily selected, entirely self-serving boundary for those who oppose the Church. If reduced "green space" is the price we must pay to retain a vibrant church, then.that is price our neighborhood should be more than willing to pay. Our neighborhood has the good fortune of proximity to a wonderful park. Concern about the reduction of "green space" should not justify rejection of the Church's proposal; We are concerned that the rejection of the Church's proposal may leave the church with no real alternative but to leave, and to sell its property to a much less desirable buyer. If that were to happen, and if the neighborhood is faced_ with a less desirable successor, then the neighborhood and particularly "the Association ".will have only itself to blame. In closing, this is not a debate over the construction of a Wal -Mart, a tiring range, an adult bookstore, or a nuclear waste storage site. This is a debate about accommodating the expansion of a church. The Church, their efforts and their contributions to our neighborhood deserve accommodation and respect. We hope and respectfully request that the Edina City Council and Planning Commission place the needs and interest of our immediate.and surrounding community above the interests of a small group of vocal opponents. We therefore request that the,Commission approve the Church's proposal. Sincerely, Robert Castle cc: City Council Planning and Zoning Commission Debra Castle April 10, 1998 Dear Mr. Larsen, This letter is in regard to the proposed expansion of Christ Presbyterian Church. We have lived on Southcrest Drive in the Woodhill area for over 40 years. Over this long time we have seen the area grow and change but always remain a very desirable neighborhood. Christ Presbyterian Church has been a participant in both this growth and change. It also has remained an asset to the area. We aren't members of the church but have learned from some that we know that the church must find a way to grow and change again in order to fulfill its commitments to its mission. We feel the church has developed a plan that in no way detracts from the neighborhood and, at the same time, has tried very hard to satisfy the Woodhill neighborhood concerns. We urge you to vote for approval of the proposed expansion. Sincerely yours, William C. Hamer 4709 Upper Terrace Edina, MN 55435 April 9. 1998 Edina Planning Commission Edina City Hall 4801 West 50'' Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 Dear Chairman Johnson and Members of the Commission: I am a homeowner in the Woodhill neighborhood and I am writing in support of the proposed expansion plans of Christ Presbyterian Church. I became a member of Christ Presbyterian Church just last month, but I have felt during the entire 18 years that I have lived in the Woodhill neighborhood that the church is an asset to the neighborhood. As a homeowner, I believe that a growing church adds vitality to the neighborhood in the same way as improvements in parks and schools. The building is used for numerous neighborhood - oriented functions. It serves as an excellent buffer between the neighborhood and Highway 100. A neighborhood is more than just private homes; it is a community with gathering places. As a new member of the church, I hope that you will allow us to expand our facility to meet the basic needs of the congregation. And as a resident of Edina, I believe that the city has a responsibility to its residents to make allowances for adequate places of worship. Churches that are successful and growing should be welcomed by the city. Sincerelv. William C. Hamer Thomas A. Swan 5104 Juanita Avenue South Edina, MN 55424 612- 929 -4658 April 13, 1998 Glen L. Smith, Mayor Members of the City Council City of Edina 4801 West 50'b Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 Dear Mayor Smith and Council Members: It was disconcerting as a member of Christ Presbyterian and a resident of Edina to attend the last planning commission meeting. Several of the neighbors opposing Christ Presbyterian's expansion actually took the position that the church was responsible for their traffic problems on 70th street! Anyone who lives near or drives on 70m knows that the density surrounding Southdale coupled with access to highway 100 naturally leads to congestion. The church's incremental traffic contributes negligibly. Some neighbors acted as if they were the only people in Edina living near a large church. We live near Grace and we like it. Any "congestion" that Grace has caused was more than offset by its community contributions, and the convenience of a neighborhood church. As neighbors of. Grace Church, we were dismayed to hear that it was relocating. We are concerned that it may lie empty, as well as about what may go in at its location. Christ Presbyterian's new and focused option addresses the legitimate concerns of the neighborhood. The new parking plan keeps cars off residential streets. The church is getting out of the rental housing business. The church plan will replace the housing stock used for the building project. This church sponsored compromise really gives both neighbors and church members something to cheer about. Unfortunately, some neighbors only want the church to leave. What will another empty church building in Edina solve? Like the neighbors near Christ Presbyterian I also pay my taxes. I am thankful that Christ Presbyterian Church is in Edina, and for the difference it has made in my life, as well as for the life of our community. Strong church congregations are essential contributors to the strength and substance of Edina. No vital community can or should ignore this. Please support the expansion of Christ Presbyterian Church. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Thomas A. Swan April 11, 1998 Dear Edina City Council Member, I am writing to express my strong support for the proposed expansion of Christ Presbyterian Church. I am a resident of Edina living at 6516 Navaho Trail. I am also an active member of Christ Presbyterian Church. I believe Christ Presbyterian Church is an asset to the community of Edina in many ways. Besides serving the spiritual needs of its members (more than half of which are Edina residents), it often acts as a community meeting place for both Christian and non- Christian groups. There is a strong sense of local community within CPC which enhances the community spirit within Edina. Many of its members are also active participants in volunteer activities in Edina and the greater Mpls area. Though I understand that neighborhoods are often hesitant to accept change, I believe the Woodhill neighborhood's opposition to the project has mostly been based on a no growth stance. Their neighborhood has been affected greatly by the expansion of businesses and office space in the Centennial Lakes area, and their concerns relating to traffic seem to be more related to other growth than to that of CPC. Their other concerns relating to the tearing down of homes and to the paving of green space have been dealt with by CPC in their most recent proposal. Their will be no net loss of single family homes and the smaller new parking lot will actually provide more green space and landscaping than the current parking lot. I add that the church has been very accommodating to their concerns regarding access by moving 69th street and making neighborhood cut through use of the parking lot easier. I urge the City to accept CPC's proposal to post No Parking signs during peak use (Sunday and Tuesday mornings, Wednesday nights) on the neighboring streets, too. I understand that it is the mission of the Planning Commission to keep the interests of all the members of the community of Edina in mind when making recommendations to the City Council. I trust that you know that planning is not just stopping change, especially when it may benefit many citizens of our city for years to come. Please consider the compromise that CPC has proposed to be one that may be accepted by all. Thank you for your consideration. L rely, Z D. S 6516 Navaho Trail Edina, MN 55439 828 -9459 CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED PRIOR TO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF APRIL 15, 1998 Bruce McPheeters 4920 Poppy Lane Edina, Minnesota 55435 April 6, 1998 Members of the Edina City Council 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Re: Proposed Expansion of Christ Presbyterian Church Dear Council Member: Thank you for your service on the Edina City Council. This is a follow up to my earlier letter to the Council, as a member of Christ Presbyterian Church ( "CPC ") and as a neighbor since Poppy Lane is very dependent on 70th Street access. I attended the entire Planning Commission meeting on February 25, 1998 and was disappointed that no one from the audience in support of the CPC expansion had the opportunity to speak. That left a one - sided, negative tone to the meeting. I plan to attend the next Planning Commission meeting on ApriI 25th, and understand that CPC has made modifications to its proposal in response to neighbor concerns. Please balance all views and display the leadership necessary to decide what is best for Edina as a community. Be bold. What About Traffic? Much of the opposition at the February 25th Commission meeting focused on traffic. I question why traffic is such a major issue when the peak usage for CPC is on Sundays and during non -rush hour times. There can hardly be a better location for a neighborhood church than at the exit of a busy highway, and between the highway and the neighborhood. If we had the luxury of picking a church site in the south and southeast areas of Edina, it is hard to imagine a better site than 70th & Hwy 100 in terms of balancing both neighborhood and highway access. If CPC was in the south Industrial Park, my kid$ would not be able to ride their bikes to church. We don't put schools in Industrial Parks for good reason. Churches should be the same way. In terms of traffic, I am also confused why there was absolutely no opposition expressed by any neighbors or Commission members at the same meeting on February 25th when new parking ramps were approved for the new office towers at Centennial Lakes. That development will bring thousands of additional cars into Edina each business day. Since 70th Street is a primary access route to Centennial Lakes from the Northwest, clearly 70th Street will be heavily impacted. The CPC expansion seems immaterial by comparison, especially since CPC does not impact peak traffic hours. How can the City of Edina approve over the years the many expansions to Southdale, Centennial Lakes and other "70th Street — impacted developments," yet deny the last church in southeast Edina the ability to grow adjacent to a busy highway? Land Use or Being a Good Neighbor. At the February 25th meeting, the president of the Wood Hill Neighborhood Association claimed that the CPC expansion is merely a "land use" issue and that the association is not anti - church. If that is the case, why is so much of the Edina City Council April 6. 1998 Page 2 opposition based on anger over CPC as a neighbor? If CPC had been a "better neighbor" over the years, would there be little or no opposition to the expansion? Should anger among a few neighbors drive a "land use" decision that affects all of Edina? Clearly, CPC could have been more proactive with neighbors over the years. Perhaps too often, the mission of CPC has focused more on Africa or the inner city of Minneapolis than its own "back yard." I would like to see that change and I hope that this approval process is a wake up call for everyone. In fairness to CPC, why not have the neighborhood association give CPC a permanent seat on its board? That would instill better communication on an ongoing basis. The solution to better neighborhood relations is not based on denying CPC the ability to grow'and be a vibrant church. CPC is the Oldest Neighbor. At the February 25th Planning Commission meeting, some neighbors complained about traffic on 70th Street or living near a growing church. While I can sympathize with their views, 70th Street (with its traffic) and CPC (with its vacant land to the north) existed before most of the neighbors purchased their homes. It is not unusual for churches to expand in phases over the years. CPC's expansion —like the traffic on 70th Street — should not be a-surpnse to anyone. What Ever Happened to Concern About Property values? Curiously, no one at the February 25th Commission Meeting even mentioned property values. Will the investment of $12 million into the neighborhood with a significantly improved parking lot landscape help or hurt property values? I lived at 5504 Brookview Avenue in Edina for 13 years (1983 -97) and the many additions to homes by my neighbors helped our home more than double in value. Even though the proposed parking at CPC will be expanded, the pine trees, landscaping, irrigation and lighting will be a huge improvement. I believe that an expanded and "beautified" CPC will help the property value of my home on Poppy Lane and the homes of most people in the Wood Hill neighborhood and south of 70th Street. What About the "Silent Neighbors "? Unfortunately, the only neighbors with an "incentive" to speak out are those opposed to the expansion. Unless a neighbor is a CPC member. there is little incentive to write letters or spend an entire evening at a Planning Commission or Council meeting if a person is neutral or in favor of church growth. The phrase "the world is run by those who show up" is all too true. But your responsibility as a Council member should be to serve the best interests of all neighbors and all residents of Edina, regardless of their civic participation. The Exodus Spiral. When I travel to other large cities across the country, I am saddened by the vacant churches in old neighborhoods and the new neighborhoods that are built without churches. Fortunately, Edina is still blessed with neighborhood churches. But that is changing. In the last five years we have lost Brookview Church on the southeast corner of Hwy 100 and 70th and the Lutheran Church of the Master on France across from Byerlys. I do not know the exact circumstances, but I believe those churches died because,they did not grow. It has been difficult for smaller churches to prosper in the 1990's because people expect wide ranging programs and youth activities that are only feasible for larger churches. History proves that Edina's smaller churches face this same challenge. It is a sad thought, but I would not be surprised if Edina loses some of its other smaller churches during the next 5 to 10 years. The same result —but for the opposite reason —is happening with Grace Church. Because Grace was unable to grow at its present site, it will be moving out of Edina. I doubt that a traditional church is likely to buy Grace's facility on France Avenue. The economics favor more condos. Edina City Council April 6, 1998 Page 3 There are no new churches being planted in Edina. Every time a church closes or leaves Edina, some of the attenders find other Edina churches. Undoubtedly, when Grace moves, CPC and Colonial will experience an influx of attenders from Grace. But what happens if CPC is also forced to move out of Edina? Then my family, along with many, many others who choose not to drive to Eden Prairie or Chanhassen 2 or 3 times per week, will attend Colonial or one of the other remaining Edina churches. Is that fair to the neighbors around Colonial? What happens when Colonial or Normandale Lutheran can no longer handle the influx of former Grace, CPC, etc. members? Every time a church closes or leaves Edina, that creates pressures on other churches who might also eventually be forced to move. Denying CPC's expansion request could eventually feed this exodus spiral. I sincerely believe that the health and vitality of Edina as a community will be forever impaired if our churches continue to close or leave. We should be just as concerned and upset about losing our churches as we would be if Edina kept closing and selling its parks or schools. The loss of churches, parks or schools destroys our sense of community. The Last Church in Southeast Edina. CPC is the last remaining church in southeast Edina. When CPC last expanded its sanctuary in 1968, undoubtedly some neighbors must have been opposed to that expansion. But if CPC had not expanded in 1968, it is a virtual certainty that there would no longer be a church at Hwy 100 and 70th Street. The old building would not support the type of church programming needed today. I believe that the really tough question is not the expansion in 1998, but the expansion needed in another 30 years in 2028. No one knows what type of a building a vibrant church will need in 2028. By then, perhaps moving will be CPC's only viable option. If so, no one in southeast Edina will be able to walk to a neighborhood church. Fortunately this is not 2028. CPC's planned expansion this year is more like 1968 —added building on the 70th Street side and more parking area between the building and the neighborhood. Lets leave 2028 decisions to the next generation and not deny the current generation the opportunity of having a vibrant neighborhood church. If the City of Edina refuses CPC's request, thereby forcing CPC to move, the City's next challenge will be to approve the park'n'ride or condos that are likely to be proposed for the CPC site. An entire redevelopment of the 70th and Hwy 100 site will create far more uncertainty for the neighborhood than the CPC proposal. Rather than go down that path, lets allow CPC to expand as proposed and keep our precious church resources in Edina. Churches help define the heart and soul of Edina. But like people, churches are not perfect. I hope that CPC can be a better neighbor, with better neighborhood communication going forward. That will be possible as long as CPC remains a vibrant church. Since this is a "land use" decision, please do what is right for all of Edina - -and not merely what is popular among those who show up. Sincerely, Bruce McPheeters April 6, 1998 Edina City Council 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Council Members, I am writing to you in support of the physical expansion of Christ Presbyterian Church. I have been a resident of Edina for 14 years as of this July. I have been a Presbyterian all my life and a member at CPC since Fall 1984. My experience at this church has been wonderful. My daughter, Holly, was confirmed and married at CPC and we both teach Sunday School. The more important matter is the community of people who make up CPC -- its staff and members. We all reach out to our community through volunteer help and financial contributions. Under John Crosby's leadership the membership has grown, because people feel this is church that cares about everyone. Personally, I am able to contribute my talents and time as I see fit, because of all the opportunities. For example, I can regularly give blood, because it is so convenient to do so at the church. This church needs to expand to continue to give opportunities to all who wish to participate. What a marvelous addition to our area. Please support the need to expand our church. If you have any questions, please call me at 927 -0230. Sincerely, Sally Krusell April 6, 1998 Planning Commission City of Edina 4801 West 50ie Street Edina, M-N 55424 Subject: Approval for Christ Presbyterian Church Building Program Dear Planning Commission: My wife and I support the building plans for Christ Presbyterian Church. We have been members of the church for nearly 20 year's•. We give both of our time and retirement money to the church because we see what a positive influence it plays in the development of children. This role is not lost on the parents and young adults who see the changes being made in their own lives as well as in their friends. I wish our grandchildren lived in the area so they could attend CPC. But we are anadous that other children can have that opportunity so have pledged to help make it possible even though we may not live long, enough to see these children grow up. The latest plan adds two lots so that two homes can be built to replace two that would be removed. As I understand it, this change was made because the neighbors were concerned over the loss of the two homes. If I lived in the neighborhood, I would be more concerned about the trade off between what the church was accomplishing in the lives of our young people vs. the loss of two living quarters. Maybe they were concerned about the property tax loss to Edina. Nevertheless, I am pleased that this was raised and approve the change. The church is operating under difficult conditions. For two years, we have used the Cornelia School as an adjunct facility. Buses have to operate between the two locations, fracturing children from their parents. Adult education attendance has drastically declined because of the logistics. I believe we are building for the immediate and for the future. This church represents a rock, a foundation, on which lives are built and changed for the better. It is a presence and an influence for which Edina and the immediate neighborhood should be proud. We urge your approval. Sincer yours, Kimball and Dorothy Cummi9rs 5601 Park Place Edina, MN 55424 DONALD A. BERGLUND 13034 Northrup Trail Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55347 (612) 944 -2634 April 7, 1998 Planning Commission Members c/o Planning Department City Of Edina Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Subject: Oak Grove Presbyterian Church Facility Expansion We request Planning Commission approval of the facility expansion at Christ Presbyterian Church. We have been members at CPC for about five years, and it has been a life changing experience for us. CPC is a community of love and care that reaches out beyond the Edina city borders to the world. Without the expansion, CPC will essentially be "shutting its doors" to others like us who want to become part of this Christian community. The growth of CPC is not driven by advertising and promotion but rather by the Spirit of God. We were drawn to CPC by this Spirit, and we are now very active members of the CPC community. We want to invite others to share our experience at CPC. We hope that you will view CPC as a very valuable asset to the Edina community. CPC is a spiritual asset to Edina contributing positively to the broader community through a wide variety , of youth programs, personal problem support groups, personal development programs, concerts, etc., all open to the entire Edina community. CPC is also an economic asset, as CPC members from outside Edina eat at Edina restaurants and shop in Edina stores. Finally, CPC is an aesthetic asset with its attractive structure located beside Normandale Road contributing to a sense of peace and stability for the City Of Edina. Thank you for your thoughtful consideration of the CPC request. Sincerely, Don and Sharon Berglund cpclet.lwp April 8, 1998 TO: Edina Planning Commission Members FROM.: Robert W. Froemming RE: Christ Presbyterian Church Expansion As a resident of Edina for thirty years and a member of Christ Presbyterian Church for approximately fifteen years, it is my hope that the matter of the Christ Presbyterian expansion can be considered by the commission members and given their approval, passed on to the Mayor and City Council for their approval. Many months of planning and meetings have been held by the church with the neighbors and City staff with the input of each being taken into consideration. It seems only logical that a solution that satisfies the concerns of all can be reached by reasonable and well informed persons. Yes, there may be compromises by all parties, but that is the nature and strength of our system. Edina has always been a community of strong churches which provide many community programs and facilities for the betterment of the whole community, as well as its members. For the community to grow and prosper, so also must its churches grow and expand. To say that churches cannot grow says that the community cannot grow. If Edina had that kind of a policy for the last twenty years it would not be the attractive community that it is today. Your "yes" vote will be much appreciated for Christ Presbyterian Churcifs Planned Expansion. 4930 Interlachen Court Edina, MN 55436 TOTAL P.02 April 08, 1998 Edina City City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear City Council Members, After hearing the strong negative reactions to the proposed expansion of CPC. I am compelled to voice my interest in the church. Our family moved to Edina in October of 1996. We looked long and hard for a neighborhood church that would stet our family We wanted a place that felt like home, that was welcoming to both my husband and me and our children. We wanted a place that would enrich our lives both spiritually and socially. We wanted a place our children could grow up feeling loved. wanted, needed and enriched. Before attending CPC, we were not regular church attendees. CPC, John Crosby, and the community within draws us there not only for Sunday services, but also for things such as Mom's Morning, Inter -faith Hospitality Network, Operation Christmas Child, Thanksgiving food drive, Christmas Cookie Drive, BSF, children's activities and many other extremely worthwhile programs. This church has changed the lives of four people in our household, not to mention the many others that most likely feel the same way. Please consider the many Rood things CPC does for the community. I want the church to grow not for growing sake. but to welcome the many new people looking for what we have found in CPC. We are not members of CPC, but have benefitted greatly from its presence. This church has made Edina home for us. Before casting a shadow on the church, people should walk in the doors and realize how much there is to offer. From experience, I know the doors are always open to those in need, those looking for a place to call home, those looking to help others in need and those looking for a safe, warm, loving place to worship. Sincerely, Sheri Guimont April 8, 1998 City of Edina Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 Dear Chairman Johnson and Members of the Commission: Thank you for giving me and the other members of Christ Presbyterian Church the opportunity to share with you and the residents of the City of Edina what a valuable asset the church is and the good works it does for the community. My wife and family of five daughters moved to Edina nine years ago from Deephaven. While we lived in Deephaven we had children attending Breck School and were worshipping at Mt. Olivet Lutheran Church in Mpls. 'We spent a lot of time driving the kids around to various functions. Our decision to move to Edina was motivated by the our desire to provide our children with the best public education available. We have not been disappointed. Three years ago my wife began attending Bible Study Fellowship (BSF) on Tuesday mornings at Christ Presbyterian Church with our three year old daughter.. Two years ago I began attending BSF Monday nights at Normandale Lutheran Church with our eight year old daughter. We began to "shop around for a new church home" We narrowed it down to Grace Church and Christ Presbyterian Church. Our decision to join Christ Presbyterian Church was based on our desire to live, educate our children and worship in the City of Edina. Since joining Christ Presbyterian Church this past year our family has has immersed itself in a variety of church and community activities available through Christ Presbyterian Church. Our lives revolve around being an active family in the City of Edina and we are proud to be from a City that has such a high regard for community welfare. Christ Presbyterian is a valuable asset to the Lindeman Family and we hope and pray that you have come to understand that the members of Christ Presbyterian Church are a valuable asset to the City of Edina. Ultimately it is the people not the buildings or homes that make a City great. Lets keep the tradition of greatness alive and thriving in the City of Edina. Sincerely,p John Lindeman 7004 Sally Lane Chairman, City Planning Comrrussion City of Edina Edina MN Dear Sir: As a resident of Edina, we have enjoyed the benefits of the church programs at Christ Presbyterian. We strongly feel that the church has a continuing positive impact on the families and youth of our area I urge you to give a favorable vote to the revised proposal for our expansion. At the last meeting I feel that there were several issues that were more emotional than factual.... difficulty in selling a house on 70th St. This may be true but it was not due to the Sunday services at the church. Alsq concerns about the traffic for children crossing 70th by Cornelia school may be real but again that is due to Southdalg The Galleria, Centennial Lakes, etc and not the Sunday morning program of CPC Again, in the six years that we have been in Edina and attending CPC we have found a refuge and urge you to support the expansion plans. Thank you, Elmer and Barbara Nelson 7201 York Ave Sq #409 Edina MN 55435 April 5, 1998 Edina City Council Members Edina, MN RE: Proposed Expansion of CPC Church My name is Blake David Hanson, I grew up in this great city, and have been a member of CPC since 1971. In my life I have had the great opportunity of coaching in this community, and affecting lives of hundreds of Jr. High and Sr. High student/athletes. I know this community and feel that I know the history well enough to predict the future. Throughout the years there have been extrodinary changes to the church that existed in 1971, one of them was the magnificent addition of the new organ - donated by Mr. Burwell. I was,a good friend of his son that perished in a horrible plane crash; many personal moments, such as dedicating winning a basketball tournament shortly after his passing, or finding peace from a confirmation trip will echo in my thoughts forever. Bottom line is that CPC needs more space for youth & small group services. The church that I know, will accommodate the concerns of the neighbors to any extent within their power, such as massive landscaping to create buffer zones - has been planned. Safety issues abound, with the amount of Sunday school activity & Sunday service attendance, the residential street parking is over capacity - there needs to be and end to buses precariously navigating the current Sunday route. At a time when so many people are seeking spiritual sermons and small group services, it makes me feel great to know that if expansion plans are approved - more people may go out into the world spreading their own experiences of peace and hope. I sing in the Chancel Choir at CPC and I am only 10 feet away from Rev. John Crosby and his staff every Sunday morning. I would speak to you with regard to Johns personality & motivation; his is simple, expansion is the best logical alternative when assessing the big picture. John & I know that "if you build it, they will come ", an increase in membership, school & small group attendance is inevitable. John is a very whole spiritual person, and yet a common man from Chicago - in short John is as solid as they come. We are grateful for him and the presence that he carries, and we live in a community that can easily spot chameleons & flim flam men. John and his staff have successfully passed the "frozen chosen' approval test & earned our trust. Thank you for you time, pacem, Blake Hanson THE HALSTEN MANAGEMENT GROUP LEIGH HANTHO 4412 Dunham Drive Edina, Minnesota 55435 -4140 (612) 924 -0833 (612) 924 -0829 Fax ' March 3, 1998 To: Craig Larsen Edina City Planner Gordon Johnson Edina Planning Commission Chairman From: Jennifer and Leigh Hantho Re: Christ Presbyterian Conditional�se Permit We are writing to express our strong support for adopting a CPC expansion proposal. We are neighborhood residents, but are not members of the congregation. I (Leigh) attended one of the hearings and found the church proposal to be well thought out and highly sensitive to neighborhood issues. We have good friends who are opposed to the expansion. much as they were to the Lutheran Church of the Master rezoning. However, the issues are totally different in this case. The only alternative the neighborhood opposition seems to want is for the church to move. CPC is a gr eat community asset, more so than any Edina church in our opinion. it unfailingly gives of itself to accommodate needs of voters, boy scouts, girl scouts, and about any other group that needs a place to meet, It also boasts the most ecumenical approach to teen age church programs, encouraging kids of all faiths to participate in their programs, camps and activities. It strikes me that this logical growth program actually alleviates many of the problems that these neighbors keep discussing the growth will cause. Everyone now knows that traffic gets congested on Sunday morning; it is likely that this will solve that problem. The issue of taking down houses they already own is also a non -issue in our opinion; the church bought them at fair market price in anticipation of this future need. They are not now asking people to give up home ownership to fit with their expansion plans. We do not have the expertise to say which proposal CPC presented is best for the city issues of traffic, emergency access, traffic flow, etc. You have the ability to make these decisions. The tragedy NNU occur if, as city leaders, you force a productive and city - minded church to move elsewhere. I did not hear one logical argument against their proposal at the hearing. I did hear alot of emotional resistance to change. Fortunately, as a planning commission, you have the ability to see through those veiled ideologies; please concentrate on the value to all of Edina. The fact is the neighbors, with or without the expansion, still live next to a church. What is the real difference if the parking lot holds 200 more cars and the sanctuary holds twice as many people for one half day every week? The parking lot design and the berming and tree bordering seemed to actually enhance the neighboring properties. Again, CPC is too valuable a community asset to lose or diminish. Their request is well thought out and is sensitive to "real" neighborhood issues. It is your job to discern between protest for the sake of opposition, versus protest of substance with real issues that do affect people and their homes. Thank you for your continuing work on behalf of all Edina residents. I have held a planning position in another community, and I appreciate how difficult some of these cases can be. March 9, 1998 City of Edina Planning Department 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Attention: City Council To Whom It May Concern As a resident of Edinborough Condominiums, I find the traffic problems around this area to be very frustrating. I do not have a problem with the buildings proposed, but do have a problem with the increased traffic problems. I feel there should be an arrow from both ways at the corner of 76th and York. That would help on the east side. The problem of getting out of Edinborough Way on to 76th street is increasing all the time. I understand that the new building on the south side is not completely occupied as of now, and so that will increase more traffic problems when it is completely occupied. I do not know what the answer for that intersection is. I know you will go ahead with the proposed buildings, but please take into consideration the traffic problems. Th�gk you, Faith Anne =nulton<:� 7631 Edinborough Way #5314 Edina, MN 55435 4504 Balfanz Road Edina, MN 55435 Edina Planning Commission 4801 W. 50th Street OEdina, MN 55424 Dear C t 0".Ug-/r- As residents of the Woodhill -Edina neighborhood, we would like to register our opposition to the proposed expansion of Christ Presbyterian Church. We object to the increased traffic this expansion wiU bring. We object to closing off the traffic flow North of the present church site. We object to the proposed landscaping changes. We object to the manner i n which CPC has bought properties with the intent of expanding their (tax free) property lines. CPC has been a good neighbor; but, i f they need such a dramatic increase in size and space, then we think CPC has outgrown our neighborhood. We suggest that they limit their activities /membership or find a larger piece of property which will allow them to accommodate their growth. Sincerely, J c� James & Patricia Reisenger March 10, 1998 Craig Larsen Director of Planning City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Larsen: This letter is to inform you of our strong opposition to the planned expansion of Christ Presbyterian Church on 70th St. in Edina. We are foremost concerned for the safety of our families. During the eight years we have lived at 6825 West Shore Drive, there has been a considerable increase in traffic on and around 70th Street and Dunberry Lane, attributable, in part, to the many activities hosted by Christ Presbyterian Church. These activities are not restricted to Sunday morning services but extend over the entire week, from the morning through the evening hours. Our children walk along Dunberry Lane to school and friends' homes, to play and to ride their bicycles. If the church continues to grow as projections indicate, and if the proposed expansion plans are approved, then these neighborhood streets (all of which lack sidewalks) would no longer be safe to share between automobiles and pedestrians (including children). It is for this reason that we strongly urge you to not approve the expansion plans for Christ Presbyterian Church. Other options, including those less desirable for the church should be explored, for in this case surely, bigger is not better. Sincerely, James Kakalios Ir Therese Brown Kakalios Dr. C. Seiler 7601 Edinbrough Way Apt. 6308 Edina, MN 55435 Tel.: 612 - 844 -0906 March 10, 98 City of Edina Planning Department 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Re.: Public Hearing Case File P -98 -2 & S -98 -2 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Since I will be unable to attend the public hearing on March 16, I hereby submit my views in writing. Having been a resident of Edinborough Way ( Edinborough Condominiums) for almost three years, I would like to, reemphasize the fact that I was attracted to this location because of its many green places, etc. it seems to me now though that every green spot is going to be taken up .and destroyed by endless new constructions of (office) buildings which certainly are not necessary. I also fear that our property value will go down at a steady pace if these inane and inconsiderate construction projects continue. Please think of the many (retired) people who bought condominiums here because they like the relative peace and quiet and landscape. Do not destroy it! And if you feel you have to, then please do plant lots of trees which absorb -at least to a degree -ever' increasing noise and pollution. .0 Se' r retired university professor aria., -b Y\ aim (_-Lyr) a-C-0 0- CkLur0k, ULLcck CLU utn 1/cd& M&v- ICr--azL '-M czcLlt C _Lvoc Q6C-11 b;FOC -ua62,,j havf- j2t t�cct P6 �uL74 clva-1-6 k �CL k4 Ij X.Ot Aa,Lt ao c-,Oc- however AV-, cCo have y to ii au- a400 A _tkz� .,t .-kr- C'VLlr5_ "-;�M P7 r Vi _Vkv�,u�. lictc 5 to c/Ucy aadkzll eaqke,27j oj,2_ Aa4,'� at2aCr aP4 af L O GCS' (f lLatcl L dc vy)(111t, eu-ce 4z.n(j. Cc_)(xj L TYL Y-1tr �rlc_zz ik vax CjLaiCAw 4-, Aayl \rhLL) (! .1 J a/u- - L -xp ra, r,(- Illy"'lY. -J c had -rrwc -L), cc, Cur c�: -z' 2L c �Lc CC2YIPA VWZY7 I Geoffrey and Camille Nash 6920 Hillcrest Lane Edina, MN 55435 (612) 925 -5119 March 22, 1998 W. Craig Larsen, Director of Planning City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 Dear Mr. Larsen: We are writing to voice our opposition to the proposed expansion of Christ Presbyterian Church (CPC). This expansion will lead to increased traffic congestion on the streets in our neighborhood. Our neighborhood is without sidewalks and increased traffic increases the risk of an accident when my children use the streets to walk and ride bikes. On the next warm day, see for yourself the amount of pedestrian traffic in our neighborhood, or on any day, observe the travel patterns of school children. Increased traffic on side streets means less safety for children on the streets where they ride and walk. CPC now holds various functions throughout the week, drawing people from all over. For example, the Bible Fellowship (a huge group drawn from many other churches) gathers at CPC on Tuesday mornings. If CPC expands, will we see large numbers of people driving and speeding through our neighborhood and sidestreets throughout the weekdays? Although CPC doesn't like to refer to itself as such, the expansion it proposes is designed for a Mega - church. This expansion does not lend itself to the church's location in a residential neighborhood. When shopping for a house five years ago I saw one a block away from the Edina Community Center and ruled it out based on the traffic that resulted from that facility. By expanding CPC will you be bringing what is in effect a community center, to my neighborhood? We urge you to consider the needs of the neighborhood as a whole and not the interests of one organization when making your decision. No single organization should be allowed to redesign a neighborhood. Let's not infringe on this residential neighborhood. Sincerely, Geoff and Camille Nash d4 1,7 e4 Bruce McPheeters 4920 Poppy Lane Edina, Minnesota 55435 March 24, 1998 Craig Larsen Director of Planning City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Dear Craig, FYI, the following is a letter that I sent to each member of the Edina Planning Commission. This is a follow up to my earlier letter as a member of Christ Presbyterian Church ( "CPC ") and as a neighbor since Poppy Lane is very dependent on 70th Street access. I attended the entire Planning Commission meeting on February 25, 1998 and was disappointed that no one from the audience in support of the CPC expansion had the opportunity to speak. That left a one - sided, negative tone to the meeting. Thank you for considering the views expressed in this letter. Please balance all views and display the leadership necessary to decide what is best for Edina as a community. Be bold. What About Traffic? Much of the opposition at the February 25th Commission meeting focused on traffic. I question why traffic is such a major issue when the peak usage for CPC is on Sundays and during non -rush hour times. There can hardly be a better location for a neighborhood church than at the exit of a busy highway, and between the highway and the neighborhood. If we had the luxury of picking a church site in the south and southeast areas of Edina, it is hard to imagine a better site than 70th & Hwy 100 in terms of balancing both neighborhood and highway access. If CPC was in the south Industrial Park, my kids would not be able to ride their bikes to church. We don't put schools in Industrial Parks for good reason. Churches should be the same way. In terms of traffic, I am also confused why there was absolutely no opposition expressed by any neighbors or Commission members at the same meeting on February 25th when new parking ramps were approved for the new office towers at Centennial Lakes. That development will bring thousands of additional cars into Edina each business day. Since 70th Street is a primary access route to Centennial Lakes from the Northwest, clearly 70th Street will be heavily impacted. The CPC expansion seems immaterial by comparison, especially since CPC does not impact peak traffic hours. How can the Planning Commission approve over the years the many expansions to Southdale, Centennial Lakes and other "70th Street -- impacted developments," yet deny the last church in southeast Edina the ability to grow adjacent to a busy highway? Land Use or Being a Good Neighbor. At the February 25th meeting, the president of the Wood Hill Neighborhood Association claimed that the CPC expansion is merely a "land use" issue and that the association is not anti - church. If that is the case, why is so much of the opposition based on anger over CPC as a neighbor? If CPC had been a "better neighbor" over Edina Planning Commission March 24, 1998 Page 2 the years. would there be little or no opposition to the expansion? Should anger among a few neighbors drive a "land use" decision that affects all of Edina? Clearly, CPC could have been more proactive with neighbors over the years. Perhaps too often, the mission of CPC has focused more on Africa or the inner city of Minneapolis than its own "back yard." I would like to see that change and I hope that this approval process is a wake up call for everyone. In fairness to CPC, why not have the neighborhood association give CPC a permanent seat on its board? That would instill better communication on an ongoing basis. The solution to better neighborhood relations is not based on denying CPC the ability to grow and be a vibrant church. CPC is the Oldest Neighbor. At the February 25th meeting, some neighbors complained about traffic on 70th Street or living near a growing church. While I can sympathize with their views, 70th Street (with its traffic) and CPC (with its vacant land to the north) existed before most of the neighbors purchased their homes. It is not unusual for churches to expand in phases over the years. CPC's expansion - -like the traffic on 70th Street -- should not be a surprise to anyone. What Ever Happened to Concern About Property Values? Curiously, no one at the February 25th meeting even mentioned property values. Will the investment of $12 million into the neighborhood with a significantly improved parking lot landscape help or hurt property values? I lived at 55.04 Brookview Avenue in Edina for 13 years (1983 -97) and the many additions to homes by my neighbors helped our home more than double in value. Even though the proposed parking at CPC will be expanded, the landscaping, irrigation and lighting will be a huge improvement. I believe that an expanded and "beautified" CPC will help the property value of my home on Poppy Lane and the homes of most people in the Wood Hill neighborhood and south of 70th Street. What About the "Silent Neighbors "? Unfortunately, the only neighbors with an "incentive" to speak out are those opposed to the expansion. Unless a neighbor is a CPC member. there is little incentive to write letters or spend an entire evening at a Planning Commission meeting if a person is neutral or in favor of church growth. The phrase "the world is run by those who show up" is all too true. But your responsibility as a Commission member should be to serve the best interests of all neighbors and all residents of Edina, regardless of their civic participation. The Exodus Spiral. When I travel to other large cities across the country, I am saddened by the vacant churches in old neighborhoods and the new neighborhoods that are built without churches. Fortunately, Edina is still blessed with neighborhood churches. But that is changing. In the last five years we have lost Brookview Church on the southeast corner of Hwy 100 and 70th and the Lutheran Church of the Master on France across from Byerlys. I do not know the exact circumstances, but I believe those churches,died because they did not grow. It has been difficult for smaller churches to prosper in the 1990's because people expect wide ranging programs and youth activities that are only feasible for larger churches. History proves that Edina's smaller churches face this same challenge. It is a sad thought, but I would not be surprised if Edina loses some of its other smaller churches during the next 5 to 10 years. The same result --but for the opposite reason —is happening with Grace Church. Because Grace was Edina Planning Commission March 24, 1998 Page 3 unable to grow at its present site, it will be moving out of Edina. I doubt that a traditional church is likely to buy Grace's facility on France Avenue. The economics favor more condos. There are no new churches being planted in Edina. Every time a church closes or leaves Edina, some of the attenders find other Edina churches. Undoubtedly, when Grace moves, CPC and Colonial will experience an influx of attenders from Grace. But what happens if CPC is also forced to move out of Edina? Then my family, along with many, many others who choose not to drive to Eden Prairie or Chanhassen 2 or 3 times per week, will attend Colonial or one of the other remaining Edina churches. Is that fair to the neighbors around Colonial? What happens when Colonial or Normandale Lutheran can no longer handle the influx of former Grace, CPC, etc. members? Every time a church closes or leaves Edina, that creates pressures on other churches who might also eventually be forced to move. Denying CPC's expansion request could eventually feed this exodus spiral. I sincerely believe that the health and vitality of Edina as a community will be forever impaired if our churches continue to close or leave. We should be just as concerned and upset about losing our churches as we would be if Edina kept closing and selling its parks or schools. The loss of churches, parks or schools destroys our sense of community. The Last Church in Southeast Edina. CPC is the last remaining church in southeast Edina. When CPC last expanded its sanctuary in 1968, undoubtedly some neighbors must have been opposed to that expansion. But if CPC had not expanded in 1968, it is a virtual certainty that there would no longer be a church at Hwy 100 and 70th Street. The old building would not support the type of church programming needed today. I believe that the really tough question is not the expansion in 1998, but the expansion needed in another 30 years in 2028. No one knows what type of a building a vibrant church will need in 2028. By then, perhaps moving will be CPC's only viable option. If so, no one in southeast Edina will be able to walk to a neighborhood church. Fortunately this is not 2028. CPC's planned expansion this year is more like 1968 —added building on the 70th Street side and more parking area between the building and the neighborhood. Lets leave 2028 decisions to the next generation and not deny the current generation the opportunity of having a vibrant neighborhood church. If the City of Edina refuses CPC's request. thereby forcing CPC to move, the Planning Commission's next challenge will be to approve the park'n'ride or condos that are likely to be proposed for the CPC site. An entire redevelopment of the 70th and Hwy 100 site will create far more uncertainty for the neighborhood than the CPC proposal. Rather than go down that path, lets allow CPC to expand as proposed and keep our precious church resources in Edina. Churches help define the heart and soul of Edina. But like people, churches are not perfect. I hope that CPC can be a better neighbor, with better neighborhood communication going forward. That will be possible as long as CPC remains a vibrant church. Since this is a "land use" decision, please do what is right for all of Edina —and not merely what is popular among those who show up. �cv n� Mc21ers February 19, 1998 Ms. Lorelei Bergman Mr. David Byron Mr. Charles Ingwalson Mr. Gordon Johnson Dear Planning Commission Members: Ms. Helen McClelland Mr. David Runyon Ms. Ann Swenson Mr. Geoffrey Workinger I have been a resident of Edina for the past 29 years and since 1975 have lived in my home at 4513 Arden Avenue. I am also a member of Christ Presbyterian Church having become a member in 1980. I hope you will support the Church's proposed building project to be presented at your February 25'' meeting. I will leave it to others to describe the nature and effect of the project, and the many benefits to the community that the Church provides. Instead, let me tell you two ways the Church has been important to me personally. The first is in my spiritual life. For 20 years after finishing college, I did not attend church or have any kind of spiritual life. In the spring of 1979, feeling a need, I began visiting some churches. Fortunately, there were a number of churches in Edina to choose from, one of which was Christ Presbyterian. One Sunday I was invited to sing in the choir. Thinking both my choir experience and my church visits might well be temporary, I went to a few rehearsals and sang at a few services, all the while being ready to quit at the drop of a hat. I never stopped. I became a member in 1980 and have been active ever since. My outlook on the world and my spiritual well -being changed as a result - and for the better, I might add. I also owe my marriage to Christ Presbyterian Church. This is somewhat of an unusual story. I had lived as a single person all my life and was perfectly happy with that. However, in 1989 I met a wonderful woman who had joined our choir from another church. We were married several years later. This came as a surprise to many of my friends because not very many men get married for the first time at age 57. Its been a wonderful time. She was an Edina resident as well, and we expect to live here for the foreseeable future. We are both grateful that the Edina community had a church that brought us together. I hope you will support the proposed project so that more people will have the opportunity to have the same kind of experiences that I have had - experiences that have been no less than life- changing. Sincerely, ,[C&U,4 n n,2 CL-10 David M. Beadie Robert N. Herman 5843 Long Brake Trail Edina, MN 55439 -2623 Mayor Smith. City Council, and Planning Commission Members March 29. 1998 The City of Edina 4801 West 501h Street Re: Church rezoning Edina. MN 55424 Dear Fellow Edinans: My wife and I both grew up in Edina. We both cherish the wonderful family atmosphere that has been carefully preserved here. When we had children. we moved back to raise our kids, put them through the excellent Edina school system, and give them the same atmosphere we enjoyed. We did an extensive search for the right church to provide spiritual direction for our family. We visited all of the neighboring churches. including ones we went to in our childhood. We selected Christ Presbyterian Church. In our opinion. this church stands out as the best family oriented church in the area. It is no surprise to us why the church has outerown its facilities. This church has helped steady our spiritual compass, and has continued to help us through some difficult times. We urge you to consider adopting site plan option number five as an acceptable compromise with the surrounding neighborhood. This plan will result in no net loss of homes. an important neighborhood concern. Eliminating rental housing. and buildin¢ new homes should improve property values. Most of the original neighborhood objections to the planned expansion are addressed in this option. We feel this is truly a win -win option. Sincerely, Robert and Karen Herman cc: Rev. John Crosby. CPC Phone: (612) 943 -8408 Far: (612) 943 -2275 a -mm1: rnnermammfrnancrer.com Gregory and Marcia Coon 4813 Wilford Way Edina, MN 55435 February 22, 1998 Craig Larsen 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 Dear Mr. Larsen, Director of Planning, City of Edina On Wednesday, February 25, 1998, a rezoning proposal and church expansion plan from Christ Presbyterian Church is scheduled to come before the Edina Planning Commission. We are residents in the Cornelia area and expect to attend that meeting to represent our disapproval of the following: 1) The destruction of residential properties in favor of a parking lot for a large and growing group that meets in an otherwise completely residential area. 2) A large group purchase of single - family dwellings in a viable, residential neighborhood because it is the least costly method of gaining land for facility and/or parking expansions and because the low density of population in a residential area means that only a "vocal minority" will object to the plans. In recent meetings with the neighborhood residents, Christ Presbyterian Church representatives indicated that a parking structure would be too expensive to build and that they would simply use the land that they had already purchased (land with three private homes on it) to expand the current parking lot. Christ Presbyterian Church recently wrote to homeowners in the area and cited its loss of 1.3 acres of land to the Hwy. 100 expansion. The letter goes on to say that they have now purchased only 1.6 to 2.5 new acres for their own expansion. And who will lose as a result of that purchase? Homeowners on Normandale Road lost land in the Hwy. 100 expansion too and now they will additionally lose privacy and experience increased traffic as membership and programs expand at the church. 3) The large bursts of traffic onto the residential streets of Normandale Road or Brittany Road, Dunberry, and Wilford Way that will occur when large services or meetings end in the expanded facility and the parking lot empties -- as proposed -- via two or three exits. 4) The effect of traffic bursts on children's play and pedestrians in a neighborhood which has no sidewalks -- Recently this neighborhood has experienced a turnover and now has a significant number of both the elderly and children under 10. 5) The rezoning of true residential property to a "conditional residential' zoning for a group of 3000 in anticipation of growth. Christ Presbyterian indicates that it draws members from and "services" a five -mile radius. A map shows that a five mile radius is bordered by the Minneapolis /St. Paul International airport, Old Shakopee Road, Flying Cloud Airport, Forest Hills Park, Oak Ridge Country Club and the middle of Lake Calhoun. This is hardly a "neighborhood" congregation. Churches traditionally have been granted a "conditional residential' zoning because neighborhood residents attended and desired that the churches be close to their homes. When "close" in a city becomes a five -mile radius, accessible via freeway, with a group of 3000 to 4000 members attending, I do not believe that any form of "residential' is the appropriate zoning. 6) The de -facto Edina subsidy of the church by the removal of at least three taxable properties and the increasing need for and provision of city services to a growing, multi - city concern. The fact is that the simple proximity of the church to an accessible freeway access (Hwy. 100) located between two nearby perpendicular freeways (Hwy. 62 and Fwy. 494) will bring more members to an already growing church if the facility is expanded. The growth of a current congregation of 3,000 members (as stated by Christ Presbyterian) means a growth of vehicular traffic and an increase in congregational anonymity. Traffic control plus patrol of parking areas hidden from neighbors views for pleasantry to the eye but available from a busy freeway access and inviting for its privacy and anonymity to those interested in mischief will require additional city services. Seven years ago, we moved to Edina from California. We had grown up in Minnesota but had lived in California for 17 years and chose to relocate to a place we judged to be "kinder to the individual." We were happy to be away from the smog, six -lane streets between walled "residential" communities, noise and anonymity among neighbors. We are members of a local church and hope it will grow and serve. We understand the desire of Christ Presbyterian Church to be of service and to improve its facilities. We do not, however, understand its desire to expand its "neighborhood" facility in preparation for major church growth when its current congregation is 3000 members.. Presbyterian USA churches exist in numerous nearby communities to serve those outside the current congregation and the currently -served area is not becoming increasingly dense. If the desire of the church is to serve a yet larger area because of its accessibility by freeway, then it is likely to become a mega church with 4000 to 5000 members. Such a church should be located on a much larger parcel of land in a non - residential area. If the church expands. notably and later needs to move to acquire yet more space for growth, what residential- compatible entity could afford to buy the property? It is not at all clear how the proposed Christ Presbyterian Church expansion and demolition of homes is consistent with the Mayor's plan to "Grow Small." A small church is likely to know the needs of its congregation and neighborhood and to serve them both effectively because they are one and the same. A mega church needs to reflect the opinions and desires of the majority of its members, to provide programs for a wide variety of interests and to draw on resources of many communities. That large church is a citizen of a metropolitan nature, not a residential one, and should be zoned as such. It should not expand its presence by removing single - family homes. We oppose the rezoning of the church property as "conditional residential' and look to our city representatives to support our "Growing Small neighborhood." Respectfully your citizen, Gregory K. Coon and Marcia Ann Coon John S. Hoyt Jr. 4812 Dunberry lane Edina, MN 55435 -1537 (616) 922 -4418, Fax 926 -5862 25 February, 1998 Members of the Planning Commission: I have had the pleasure, in the past, of sitting up there with you in 1970 -71 as the Edina School Board representative to the Planning Commission and, in 1972 through 1976, Representing the District before both your organization and the City Council as Chairman of the Edina School Board. However It was, I believe, about the turn of this decade that I first appeared before a City of Edina regulating or governing body with respect to Christ Presbyterian Church — which I shall refer to as "CPC" for ease of future reference. It was, in fact, an appearance before the Edina City Council when CPC last requested an exception to existing rules or regulations in order to accommodate their desire to grow. I remember the meeting well. Particularly two exchanges between the then incumbent Mayor (Fred Richards) and representatives of CPC. 1. The first was when he was apprised that CPC had offered to relocate (or shade) an existing parking lot light that was shining directly into a neighborhood home. CPC indicated they would be happy to oblige if the neighbor would pay the cost — something between $150 and $250! -- This offer after several points had been made about what a poor neighbor the church had been! The Mayor said (and, if not a direct quote, it is close to one): "If the church wants to be a good neighbor it had better fix it at its own expense - and quickly." CPC did. 2. The second exchange came at the conclusion of the Council meeting when Mayor Richards, after a Council vote approving the CPC request, said to CPC representatives (and again , if not a direct quote, it is close to one): "That's it. Don't come back and ask for further expansion; because you'll have to move." CPC representatives state that that Fred's statement is not quoted in the minutes of the meeting and therefore does not matter! I suggest you ask Mayor Richards, or the architect for CPC at the time, and/or both neighbors and CPC residents that were there (If there is a written record of attendees) their recollections of the meeting. Now they are back. A simple request.. Let me phrase it in non -CPC language, plain English that we all understand: • "Let's raze three single family residence homes (taking perhaps $400,000 to $500,000 off the homestead tax rolls and raising everyone else's; • "Let's vacate a street (or move it!) just so our parishioners are never - even a few times a year - inconvenienced; • "Let's abut private residential homes with a parking lot (that will be filled less than 26 wintry Sundays a year and never otherwise (except by a Tuesday group that doesn't belong to the church's mission.) A group, by the way, that yesterday, February 24th, at 8:50 am had six cars in the parking lot and over a dozen parked on 69th Street and Dunberry Lane because they can't wait to make an orderly exit from the lot!; and, * "And, since, with our expansion, we will need more members lets put up the tallest church steeple in Edina, 138' -6 ". (That way they can attract people from even further away!) [That may be an. unnecessary comment but it does reflect a concern of the neighborhood that they will again be back to you in the future - a possibility they pass off with "Well, we personally won't be here to propose it then. "]" The supposed four options that CPC presented to the neighborhood here in this room are, in my opinion, but a single option -- "We want our way regardless — but here are some ( I submit), relatively futile variations on our theme. ". The Woodhill neighborhood Association - reconstituted admittedly to respond to this threat - opposes the proposed request by the CPC. You should too, and would save the City Council the time and trouble of going through this again. I can tell you - with assurance - that not only does the Association oppose the CPC proposal'but so do church members who are unwilling to "Rock the Boat" of the CPC hierarchy who want to "Reach out to the World." Please ask them to do it elsewhere or lower their sights a little. They are big enough now to foster and nourish a sister church in another location. Thank yo cc: Council Members CORRESPONDENCE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO PLANNING COMMISSION'.."e!!'4EET,!".',G OF FEBRUARY 25, 1998 01 City of Edina Land Use, Platting and Zoning 850.01 Section 850 - Zoning 850.01 Findings, Purpose and Objectives 850.08 Parking and Circulation 850.02 Short Title 850.09 Loading Facilities 850.03 Rules of Construction. Interpretation, 850.10 Landscaping and Screening Severabdity, Definitions 850.11 Single Dwelling Unit District (R -1) 850.04 Administration and Procedures for 850.12 Double Dwelling Unit District (R -2) Variances, Rezoning, Transfer to 850.13 Planned Residence District (PRD. PSR) Planned Districts, Conditional Use 850.14 Mixed Development District (MDD) Permits, Temporary Conditional Use 850.15 Planned Office District (POD) 350.05 Permits Districts 850.16. Planned Commercial District (PCD) 850.06 District Boundaries 850.17 Planned Industrial District (PID) 850.07 General Requirements Applicable to all 850.18 850.19 Regional Medical District (RMD) Automobile Parking District (APD) Districts Except as Otherwise Stated. 850.20 Heritage Preservation Overlay District Storage of Refuse. Home Occupations. (HPD) Fences, Setbacks, Building Coverage 850.21 Floodplain Overlay District (FD) 850.01 Findings, Purpose and Objectives. The Council finds that Edina has emerged from an era exemplified by unparalleled growth and development and has entered periet!= ^ °sn'-hy, reus:. and redevelopment; that some of the standards and regulations which guided initial development of the City are not appropriate for guiding future development and redevelopment; and that standards and regulations for guiding future development and redevelopment should be based upon Ltie stated goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan of this City, as from time to time amended, which constitutes the City's statement of philosophy concerning the use of land within its jurisdiction. Through the enactment of this Section, the Council intends to implement this statement of philosophy so as to provide for the orderly and planned development and redevelopment of lands and waters in Edina, to maintain an attractive living and working environment in Edina, to preserve and enhance the high quality residential character of Edin.. and to promote the public health, safety and general welfare. Specirically, this Section is intended to implement the following objectives, some of which are contained in the Comprehensive Plan: Maintain. protect and enhance single family detached dwelling neighborhoods as the dominant I:uid use. Encourage orderly development of multi - family housing that offers a wide range of housing choice, density and location while maintaining the overall high quality of residential development. Control the use, development and expansion of certain non - residential uses in the Single Dwelling Unit District in order to reduce or eliminate undesirable impacts of such non- residential uses. 850- 1 1 i Woodhill -Edina Association c/o 6624 Southcrest Drive Edina, MN 55435 February 19, 1998 Mr. Craig Larsen Director of Planning City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Craig, I am in receipt of CPC's formal application to the city as well as Peter Jarvis' letter dated February 16,1998. I feel the need to provide an immediate response to you, the Planning Commission and the City Council for your consideration prior to the meeting next Wednesday. I am both angered and personally offended at a number of the misrepresentations and half truths which Peter Jarvis has made in his recent letter to our neighborhood and thier application to the city. I apologize for taking your time concerning the issue of communication, however I believe it is critical for you, the planning commission and the city council to undens,u i,.A` liYuf C teas failed miserably at communicating with us about our concerns. I realize that technically, from a legal standpoint, they have no legal obligation to communicate with us. However, I took great comfort as a concerned neighbor and President of this association when I spoke with you last spring and you told me that the city had told CPC to make sure they communicated with our neighborhood about our concerns prior to submitting a plan for approval. I took this as a safeguard for our neighborhood and an assurance that a process to address our concerns would be followed. As the developer of this project, CPC has an implied obligation as a member of our community to address the neighborhoods concerns regardless of any written or legal obligations. Opus and its partner, I believe thier name is Kensington, is a current example of how proactive communication can create a collaborative process between developer and neighbors in their recent dealings with the neighbors adjacent to the Lutheran Church of the Master. This is the process that we repeatedly requested of CPC and were repeatedly denied. I am personally offended at CPC's representations that they were proactive in communicating with us about our concerns. I will respond to Peter Jarvis' 2/16/98 letter first, then to his attachment of that letter entitled "CPC's Response to Neighbor Presented Proposed Expansion Overview and Board of Directors Resolution of 6/23/97". Responses to Peter Jarvis' 2 -16 -98 letter: Paragraph 5, top of page 2: "Some neighbors suggested that CPC's only alternatives to handle our growth are to: 1) simply do nothing to our site, or 2) move out of Edina." It may be true that some neighbors suggested these as the only two alternatives. I don't know who "they" are, but it certainly wasn't me or any member of our Board. We were interested in discussing the 7 other alternatives that CPC indicated as feasible alternatives to accomodate thier growth, not just the 2 as Peter Jarvis has suggested. Furthermore, as President of this association I was representing over 230 homes regarding this issue with the church. It seems odd that after our June 20th lunch last summer where John Crosby, Peter Jarvis, Polly Bowles and Matt Faulkner agreed with Tom Carrico and me that all communication between CPC and the neighborhood would go between John or Peter and Tom or me, that Peter Jarvis would refer to any other communication than what took place between us. Furthermore, despite repeated requests to meet with the decision makers of the church to discuss our concerns, other options and alternative solutions, WE WERE NEVER GIVEN AN OPPORTUNITY TO DISCUSS ANY OTHER OPTIONS than the proposed option. NOT ONE! Paragraph 6, pgaee 2: "Once CPC's congregation decided to propose an expansion, we turned to you, our neighbors, to seek input regarding concerns..." and then he adds at the end of the paragraph regarding their attempts to communicate, "Others think we have fallen short. " Pardon me, but give me a break! CPC did not turn to us in any capacity until they had finalized their plans in December of 1997 and were prepared to start the process with the city for approval. As far as them falling short, they never even got off the ground. I am offended that an individual with Peter Jarvis" professional background who worked jointly with Polly Bowles, a practicing attorney can represent to you with a straight face that they undertook a process to discuss concerns. To shrug their shoulders and say, " We tried. Really we did." is absolutely unacceptable and offensive. They not only denied repeated requests to meet with me, the appointed representative, to discuss options and concerns but by doing so ignored their obligation as the developer of this project to deal with neighborhood concerns. By having the association available to meet with them. we had a streamlined process for CPC to tap into to communicate with the neighborhoc ' , snored and rejected both it and our requests. Paragraph 7. page 2: Regarding the so -called neighborhood meetings that CPC had called last April, I can assure you of one thing, they did not get a letter from me or the majority of my neighbors.. At our Saturday February 7th meeting it was quite clear that the majority of the people who were there never heard about the April meetings and thus never had an opportunity to give their input. The written comments and "hours of listening to neighbors both in meetings and in private conversations" represent a feigned attempt to create the appearance of communication with our neighborhood for purposes of appeasing the city of its obligation to do so. The information they received was taken from such an extremely small population of our neighborhood that it cannot be seen as a composite representation of our concerns. Paraaravh 8—r=e "CPC believes our four new design alternatives reflect our sincere effort to address our neighbor' stated concerns." What stated concerns? I never submitted mine, nor did the majority of my neighbors. We never had a chance. It is impossible for their designs to address our concerns because they have never taken the time to discuss what these concerns are with us. As it relates to the information that we circulated being inaccurate. We got it from plans that CPC had submitted to the City. They were as accurate a plan as was available to us at the time. It's hard to have information that is more up to date if nobody is willing to meet with you to discuss your concerns. Responses to Peter Jarvis' addendum of his 2 -16 -98 letter entitled "CPC's response to neighbor presented proposed expansion overview and Board of Directors' Resolution of 6- 23 -97 ": COMMENTS 1& 2: CPC represents that "current seating capacity for sanctuary events is 648." To represent seating capacity of 648, CPC has identified not how many people fit into the current sanctuary, but rather how many people they can seat when they use overflow seating in the Fireside Room. A more realistic projection -if one were to use this philosophy and assumptive approach, would be to consider the worse case scenario as opposed to the one CPC has which is by far the most conservative case. Under a more realistic projection one would assume that CPC expands their site as proposed and continues to grow to where they need to spill over and use the Narthex area and the Fireside Room for additional seating in the same manner that they currently are doing with the Fireside Room. Under this scenario it would be an increase of 450 seats (approximate seating for the current sanctuary) to 1500 -1600 seating capacity in the new plan (this includes the new sanctuary, the Narthex and the Fireside Room), for an increase of 233 -255% increase in seating capacity. Staggering! This however is as inaccurate a way to look at it as the CPC's method because there is a major clarification and correction in defining and evaluating seating capacity that is needed here. The current method that CPC is using to calculate this comparison is wrong because they mix inconsistent aspects of both plans. To evaluate this correctly there are two possible definitions that could be used. Definition A: In order to attain a seating capacity of 648, CPC must include seating currently being used in the Fireside Room which is the room that, is adjacent to the current sanctuary. If you include the Fireside Room in one calculation then you must include both it and the new Narthex area as additional seating capacity in the new buildings calculation as well in order for it to be a consistent corn _rison., Using this. correct method of calculation, this would create a capacity for ,qn ^ter events" closer to 1500 to 1600 people in the proposed expansion. This translates into an increase of between 131 -147% from the current capacity of 6481 Definition B: If you would rather eliminate the seating in the Fire Side from your calculations, then you need to do the same again with the proposed expansion. The sanctuary seats 498. Expanding the sanctuary from 498 seats to 951 seats equals a 91% increase. Definition A is the more appropriate method because it takes into account the overflow capacity that the Narthex and Fireside Room can provide in the event of continued expansion, a solution that is already being utilized by CPC in its existing operation. The critical factor here is that your calculation for growth has to be consistent to have merit or value. CPC is inaccurately mixing aspects of each plan in order to create the appearance of a less dramatic increase. Regardless of which option you want to use, the increase is considerable. An increase of between 91 -147 %. Comment 3: The issue concerning the vacation or relocation of the street deals with traffic and congestion associated with the capacity of the expanded site. Comment 4: Current parking is 350. The proposed plan varies by plan at either 546 or 647. These represent increases of 56% or 85% respectively. Comment 5: CPC's response is indirect and evasive. While it appears that they are currently in violation of their 1998 parking agreement, they want you to grant them the ability to expand the site to accommodate more capacity. Why would we do this when they have not performed on their prior obligations? They also speak of improved and expanded green space do to new irrigation systems. Why would we want them to have more green space and improved landscaping when that don't currently maintained the minimal landscaping they have? And despite his intention to divert the issue they are in fact tearing down 4 homes a number of beautiful trees and two lovely vacant pgrcels for a parking lot! Comment 6: Phase 1 and Phase 2 cannot be looked at independently. It is irrelevant when Phase 2 will be built because it is part of the Master Plan that is proposed. The purpose of the Master Plan is to look at the big picture'of what is being planned. As to its increase in Phase 2 being 78% instead of 100 %, I stand corrected. It is still a significant increase! Comment 7: We acknowledge that CPC is an asset to the neighborhood. However, the effects of the increased traffic throughout our neighborhood due to this expansion cannot be ignored. Comment 8: The traffic along West 70th has .1 .....-r ecent years. Planned Unit Development already approved by the City will only make that situation worse. Regardless of its percentage, CPC is a part of that problem. A problem that will be increased by this expansion. As to their traffic study, we have reviewed it in detail. It is inconclusive, incomplete and does not address issues of risks and future projections adequately or appropriately. This issue will be addressed in detail on Wednesday. Comment 9: Alternative solutions do exist and will not be considered seriously until the City tells CPC that the option they are pursuing is not one that is viable. At that time, we will all be amazed at how viable the other options actually are. CPC has to understand that they are part of a neighborhood, our neighborhood. As part of our community eve all have to be respectful of each others issues and concerns. CPC's cavalier attitude and approach to this process has been both offensive and self righteous. Comment 10: If CPC acknowledges that off -site options will have to be considered in 10 years, why don't they consider them now? You can draw 2 conclusions here. 1) Off -site solutions are viable now, but this is simply more convenient and the off -site options will only be considered if you say no to the proposed plans. Or... 2) In 10 years, they will simply come back again and ask to expand further into the neighborhood. This time their argument will be that they have invested over $8 million dollars in this campus and there is no way they could ever consider going someplace else! It is time to say enough is enough! Comment 11: CPC is no longer a neighborhood church as it was originally intended. They tell us that change is inevitable to which I concur. Our neighborhood has changed dramatically over the years having to deal with increased traffic on West 66th, West 70th, France Avenue, Highway 100. We no longer can have our children who are close enough to school, do it safely. We have accepted significant change as part of everyday life and dealt with it. However, in this situation it is the CPC who is changing, not the neighborhood. And I do not see them making any sacrifices to deal with our concerns about their change. Comment 12: If you don't think the proposed changes will have a diminuation of values on our homes, talk to a Realtor. Remember, there is already a church in the neighborhood. So we already have the asset in our community. I don't know of a (unbiased) Realtor that would tell you that "the bigger church, the bigger the asset." As I stated earlier in this letter, the traffic study that was conducted is inaccurate and inconclusive. I encourage you to use your common sense. If you more than double the size of the sanctuary, you almost double the amount of education space, you increase the parking by 60 -80 %, you are going to have an increased safety risk in the neighborhood. And that doesn't even factor into account the impact of other pre - approved commercial development in the area. To use a simple analogy, "If you increase the size of the funnel and put more water into it, more water is going to come out. Not less!" It's that simple. I apologize for the length of this letter, however I feel, it,irpportant for you to hear both sides of the issues. accurately. I lock'forward to Wednesdays meeting and the opportunity to share our concerns in person. Thank you for your time. cc: Edina Planning Commission Edina City Council I:\BROKERAG\SfEVEBVE=SVARVIS I .WPD T I ( L k; 7,/ � aV IV L j4 6u� C&-ircl CLI y �(, ^,.,c',CCC� -C,.G� u��u��,�/ (,Z,�1� ;;��Q�!".'�Y.i•Yi�G' �'Ct- 17'•}'j�ti+�7�1C�'p�. zcd c � ,/ � / � (�; (G.� /j ✓C.tJC� v /i'Z_t�f � "L ��4° L(./i "�d; ✓�y'fi CG�IG'3' y � .�?�7.000/ "7 ;.y� �C lt.. �YilG�C�ir'i'C% y ��,✓����Z r � red ,���: �(, ^,.,c',CCC� -C,.G� u��u��,�/ (,Z,�1� ;;��Q�!".'�Y.i•Yi�G' �'Ct- 17'•}'j�ti+�7�1C�'p�. zcd c � ,/ � / � (�; (G.� /j ✓C.tJC� v /i'Z_t�f � "L ��4° L(./i "�d; ✓�y'fi CG�IG'3' y � .�?�7.000/ "7 ;.y� �C lt.. �YilG�C�ir'i'C% y ��,✓����Z r � red ,���: I Mrs. Margaret Ga 1 1 agner 6812 Brittany Road Edina, Minnesota, 554,35 February 20, 1998 ar Ladies and Gentleman of the Edina Planning Commissions, My name is Margaret (Peg) Gallagher and I live at 6812 Brittany Road. husband and I bought our lot in 1965 and built and moved into our home in .j66 in which I still reside (32 years). I'm writing to you to register my opposition to Christ Presbyterian Ilurch's proposed expansion . I feel strongly it will have a very negative mpact on my neighbors and me. To mention a few of my concerns: - Increased traffic. - The safety of of many small children moving into our neighborhood from increased traffic. - Loss of road access into the neighborhood - Loss of view We have both our family room and living room in.the back of the house. They both have wall of glass. - Potential crime in parking lot The proposed parking lot will abut my next door neighbors back yard. - Increased pollution with the cars stopping and starting I'vr had heart by -pass surgery and decent air is essential to my life. - Noise from the cars - It will limit my grandchildren sliding in my backyard. - Privacy We had a swimming pool in our backyard and anjoy the seclusion. We built a wrought iron fence around it to enjoy the view. Now occasionally children will wander up from ttie church to look at it. If a parking lot is only a house away, I am afraid it will become something of an attraction and potential danger. We will lose much of lose our privacy and it is not financially feasible to replace the fence. - All of the proposed plans proposed to demolish three home north of 69th street which will remove them from the tax rolls. I am not opposed to the church. In fact I go to church three or four rimes a week. However. I do feel that Christ Presbyterian does not have adequate space to continue expanding the present church site. They have many .:embers from other suburbs so maybe it's time for a satellite church or a ;,ecial building for their extra circular activities l � Y We have been through this request many times before. I wish they would get the idea that we don't want a parking lot in our residential zoned land next to our houses. It was my impression the last time that they would not be allowed to cross 69th street and any expansion had to be on the church site. I think it was very devious of the church to try to eliminate that problem by buying up the three residential houses. I'll be very grateful for any consideration you can give to keeping our neighborhood intact. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Sincerely, Margaret Gallagher Robert J. Hursh 4821 Dunberry Lane Edina, MN 55435 February 18, 1998 Craig Larsen Director of Planning City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Larsen: I'm writing at this time to express my opposition to the proposed expansion plans of Christ Presbyterian Church. The Woodhill Association will be expressing collective neighborhood concerns. I'll try to restrict myself to more personal ones. Six numbered photographs are enclosed. I'll refer to them as I detail my personal concerns. I'm concerned that we will no longer have a west view. Everything in our current view, of any interest, will be leveled. Photo one is looking west through our living room window. Photo two is our current view looking west from an upstairs bedroom. These views will become nothing but parking lot, turning to a wall of dense spruce as time goes on. I've very concerned about loss of afternoon sun. I won't be able to grow vegetables in my garden or attract purple martins to my birdhouse. We won't be able to see sunsets from our screen porch. My interest in gardening and martins are longstanding. I've attached a copy of a letter sent to CPC in February, 1990 on these concerns. The church didn't bother to respond. I'm concerned that the distance from our property line to the proposed parking lot will shrink by more than 50 %. The line on photo four shows the edge of the proposed lot. Also, the distance doesn't seem sufficient for snow removal. The equipment being used in photo three, taken three weeks agok, is throwing snow at least 40 feet. I'm concerned that the elevation of the parking lot will be raised by over 5 feet along our property line and be only two feet below street level at the north end. This will bring the lot not only much closer to the neighborhood but essentially right up and into it. The line on photo 5 is approximately 5 feet above the current parking lot. I'm concerned about the loss of the three houses north of 69`h street and their mature trees. These houses and trees buffer traffic noise from hiway 100. The immediate neighborhood will be much noiser without them. I'm concerned about tree selection for the west and north parking lot / neighborhood buffer. Spruce trees grow fast. When we moved here 12 years ago, the blue spruce trees along 69`h street at 6824 Brittany Road were Christmas tree size. Look at them now (photo 2), just 12 years later. Spruce trees recommended for Minnesota (I reviewed the four varities sold by Bachman's and three varities recommended in University of Minnesota Extension Service Factsheets) have a wider spread than the strip of land on the parking lots east and north sides. They attain heights of 40 to 65 feet. Base spread can be up to 35 feet.. Edina's second largest bur oak is in our back yard (photo 5, upper right). A substantial portion of this trees' root system is on church property. I'm concerned that exposing and cutting the roots ° through grading, excavating, etc. may damage or even kill the tree. Photo 6 was taken from the CPC's entrance to W 69h Street. I've circled the chimney of our home for a reference. I included it to show an attractive area that will be claimed by the proposed expansion. I feel that the proposed church expansion and parking lot are simply too big for this residential neighborhood. And not nearly enough green space is provided for, especially along the parking lot / neighborhood border. The proposed expansion will greatly diminish the enjoyment we take from our home and yard. I hope we can count on you to support the residents of the Woodhill neighborhood. Sincerely, G`r Robert J. sh f 4804 West 70i° Street Edina. MN 55435 (612) 927 -4256 David &Mary Dolezal i ••� City of Edina Offices 4801 West 50`s Street Edina, MN 55424 liar Sr or NWanf We are writing to you sir, in support of the rezoning as it relates to Christ Presbyterian Church of Edina. We live immediately east of the church and will be experiencing the effects of the rezoning ELM hand While their may be sour. I'nid i ;g riionihs during the construction period -if so granted, we believe the churches growth is crucial to the community of Edina. We are willing to withstand the construction period with our sites focused on the end result which we believe will be great contributions to the community of Edina We are not members of "CPC ", however, my wife, Mary, has attended seminars, open to the community, which have helped to greatly enriched our lives and our careers. She has also met people from out -of -state at these seminars, who in turn spent money in our community restaurants and retail centers. "CPC" is not just a place of worship, in fact "church" refers to "people', however, as many have promoted here- as a building. A church is considered a community of people, who come together for worship, assemble for meetings, education, enrichment. and at this particular church to help the community in its time of need We are not concerned about the future growth of "CPC" and its effect on the community of Edina. Rather, we would be pleased because this is a sign of a "living" church, where the members are "actively" expressing the teachings of Christ. Growth demonstrates to a community that there is life, and we have witnessed the out - reaching to the community members, which is what God intended for the church to be. He intended for us to be reliant on Him and His followers for our needs. While we have attended several neighborhood meetings, we felt our concerns would be best addressed directly by "CPC ". We have concerns specific to the property line and the lighting of the lots, and the traffic next to our driveway. We are pleased to see traffic at the church. which is during off -peak times. The church controls Sunday traffic by utilizing the City of Edina and bussing people from Cornelia Elementary School. "CPC" has been very understanding of our concerns and has continued to communicate with us and assuring us of addressing our needs through design and construction phases. 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 . . . . . r . February 22, 1998 Page 2 We truly believe it would be quite unfortunate for this congregation to leave Edina, as it would be the second large church community to leave, next to Grace Church. We feel there would be lost revenue, and perhaps fewer people considering Edina as a community to live in and raise their children. We must remember this property is located next to a major highway, and we are concerned what might possibly move into this space if it were to be vacated We believe "CPC' is a safe environment to live next to and one, which is helpful to our community and the greater Twin Cities area. We cannot see any long -term detriments to this neighborhood or community and feel the existing church community members desire to expand far out -weigh the neighborhoods' concerns. Please consider the positive growth potential of this church. We have decided not to participate in joining our neighbors in their fight against this expansion as we felt we needed to determine for ourselves if this was truly detrimental to our property our community and us. To date, we have been treated with great respect by "CPC' and have been informed at all stages of development and design, with our concerns being addressed Since "CPC' has taken the time to listen, we believe they are actively demonstrating to us that they are concerned about the same things we are concerned about, - our property our community and us. We hope you will consider allowing the rezoning of this area to benefit the Edina community! Respectfully. David Mary. Christopher. Andrew & Samuel Dolezal Joan W. Hursh 4821 Dunberry Lane Edina, MN 55435 February 21, 1998 Craig Larsen Director of Planning City of Edina 4801 West 50`' Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Larsen: As an immediate neighbor to the east of Christ Presbyterian Church I was invited, and attended, several informational meetings regarding the expansion of the church. I would like to express several concerns regarding these meetings. 1. I have a very strong concern about a statement made by Peter Jarvis. In discussing the neighborhood's objections to the plans, a very subtle comment made by Mr. Jarvis, with almost immediate backpedaling, suggested that the exparsion.-vias a done deal and the neighborhood should select the least objectionable plan. I got the distinct impression that he felt the church had the Planning Commission and City Council in their back pocket. I sincerely hope this is not the case and that the commission and council will review the attached excerpt from the City Ordinance. (Note highlighting) 2. The church professes to incorporate the concerns of the neighborhood when, in fact, many real concerns were overlooked if they did not fit into the plans of the church. Of great concern to the immediate neighbors. the ones most affected by this expansion, is the fact that as the church now stands it is not highly visible to the neighborhood. The proposed plans eliminated much of the natural lay of the land by ignoring the embankments and elevating a part of the parking lot to bring it into closer proximity of the neighboring houses. Also their desire to build a "wall of trees" in no way will create an appearance of landscaping now available in the neighborhood. It will be just that, "a wall of trees" which in many respects is no better than a wood fence. I do understand their desire for parking on their property but as has been observed in the past, it is rare occasion when all parking spaces will be filled. A more pleasing alternative to the neighbors would be fewer parking spaces and maintaining much more green space, a plan they are not interested in considering. I feel that the neighbors are being asked to make all the concessions while the church makes none. 3. Another major concern is the routing of traffic on the proposed plans. The plans call for all incoming traffic to be routed within 40 to 50 feet of our house, our master bedroom and living room are on this side of the house. When we purchased the house 12 years ago it was the lack of traffic near our house and in our neighborhood that was a strong selling point. As stated in the attached City of Edina Ordinance. please support the people of this neighborhood to, "Maintain, protect. and enhance single family detached dwelling neighborhoods as the dominant land use. ". Sincerely, . oan V. Hursh February 22, 1998 Dear members of Christ Presbyterian Church: I am writing in response to your letters to the neighbors of CPC. My comments will be in reference to many of the statements in your letters dated May 13, 1997 and Feb. 16, 1998. Specifically, you stated " Many of our neighbors ( including non - members of CPC ) have no opposition to CPC's expansion. On the contrary, as I live in the neighborhood and am close to the situation I have talked to virtually nobody around here that is in favor of the proposed expansion. In fact, the resolve of the neighborhood is strong, and nearly unanimous in being reluctant to go along with the expansion plans. Actually, with the recent posting of the REZONING Signs, the'neighbors seem to be alarmed at the sheer size of this expansion proposal. In your letter of May 13 you state "enclosed is an information sheet with basic points regarding CPC's growth and history." Later in this letter it is stated, "It is commonly said that a church either grows or becomes stagnant and dies." As I re -read this letter, I really didn't find any helpful info regarding CPC's growth. I read where the church was founded in 1957, but there was no mention of the membership count at that time. I have been made aware of a tremendous growth of CPC's congregation from 1957 through the 60's, 70's, 80's, and on into the 90's. This contradicts your statement about a church becoming "stagnant" or "dying." In fact, this property site and neighborhood has seen CPC grow and flourish as your building has expanded and your membership rolls increased dramatically! It is simply unfair to suggest that the growth of CPC has been denied. Therein lies the problem -- while your membership and building usage have grown (not stagnated), it is apparent that CPC may be nearing the point of critical mass for this pay i :ulai' "I'e. i fief that by destroying four houses and replacing them with a parking lot does seem like you're making way for a "Mega- Church" (your words!). The neighbors have watched a quiet community church grow into a busy multi -use, multi - purpose activities center, which is a very disturbing trend that we want stopped. CPC has not really answered many of the neighbors concerns— they have "responded" to a few comments, but have not really allayed the real concerns and worries. For example, it really isn't neccessary to commission an "independent" traffic study to determine traffic flow in and around the church. We all know that by doubling the parking lot size and at least doubling the congregation size it neccesarily follows that traffic will increase, if not at least double! As busy as the Highway 100 and 70th street interchange is, you should be able to appreciate the neighborhood concern of many, many more cars flowing in and out. And I don't understand how a 12' -14' evergreen landscape job is ever going to block the view of a 138' tall steeple? Or a 60' tall expanded sanctuary? You see, it's more than one thing that concerns us. We all have eyes and minds and memories -- and a bordering of trees will not prevent our neighbors from knowing that behind the trees sits a HUGE, flat, dreary parking Iot.Speaking of landscaping efforts, it was stated at the meeting at City Hall on Feb. 4 that several Oak trees at the South and Southeast ends would probably be lost during constuction. In my opinion, losing even one of our beautiful Oaks to this proposed expansion is one too many to lose for making way for a parking lot. Let's not assume that if the neighbors say " No," then CPC won't build... nor should CPC simply - state that "We are going to expand- pick the option you can live with ." That's why we have a Planning Commission and a City Council— this is going to be their decision to make, not yours or mine. 1 would -like them to know and be aware that what is involved is the razing of four houses on three different streets ( 70th, Brittany, and E. Frontage ) to make way for this proposal. With basically no where else to build in the City of Edina, I believe it to be very poor policy to destroy four houses in one of the City's finest areas. Keeping in mind that if half of CPC's congregation are Edina residents, it follows that one half are Non -Edina residents. I resent these Non - voting, Non - taxpaying, Non - residents exerting their will and influence on my neighborhood! In closing , it seems to me there should be some other solution or option that has yet to be proposed. Christ Presbyterian Church has grown— and grown at a dramatic rate. Using the numbers that CPC provided, if we project forward, in a mere 5 to 7 years CPC will most likely need to expand further, cap the growth, or relocate. These are exactly, the same topics we are discussing now. These are exactly our concerns for today about this proposed expansion, let alone the projected exponential growth that would come about in the near future if this proposal goes through. Whether CPC has been a good neighbor or bad neighbor in the past, I really don't know. But to trust this development now is too much of a " leap of faith " for me and many of my neighbors. I respectfully hope the Planning Commission Members and the City Council Members study this proposed expansion carefully, and come up with a " No" vote on this matter. Sincerely, ✓%fin. Dr. John E. Huepenbecker cc:Edina City Council -Members Edina Planning Commission Members Polly Bowles, Neighborhood Liaison Peter E. Jarvis • Anne & David Tynan 6617 Southcrest Drive Edina, MN 55435 Telephone (612) 929 -9446 Fax (612) 929 -9457 Mr. Peter E. Jarvis Christ Presbyterian Church Dear Mr. Jarvis, Thank you for your communication of February 16, 1998, describing the proposal of expansion for Christ Presbyterian Church. We appreciate the communication, and the attached previous communication of May 13, 1997. We had not seen the May 13 communication. We have been residents of the Woodhill addition- for almost two years. We certainly appreciate the current character of the neighborhood, as-well as the components such as churches and schools that enable -the strength of the community. We are opposed to further expansion of the present church facility, and have signed the petition against it. The proposal positions the church in the "mega- church" status, and therefore positions itself outside the denrition of "neighborhood" church. The proposed size of the church, by definition, moves toward the definition of a commercial property, thus justifies a move to a more, appropriate. location-where-the consequence of such size would not disrupt the character of any particular neighborhood. We feel that there are alternatives in maximizing the present facility that have not been detailed in the present proposal, that may maximize-the-current structure's capacity. For instance, simply adding additional services may allow for considerable membership expansion. We would prefer that these types -of considerations be implemented vs. expansion of the facility. We ask that CPC support and preserve -the present neighborhood's character, by abandoning its expansion plans for the. present facility. Thank you for your consideration. Regards, Anne and Dave Tynan Copy: Mr. Glen Smith, Mayor Mr. Craig Larsen, Director of Planning February 23, 1998 Glenn L. Smith. Flavor and Members of the City Council City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 RE: Expansion Plans of Christ Presbyterian Church Dear Mayor and Council Members: You will soon be called upon to make a decision regarding the expansion plans of Christ Presbyterian Church. I'd like to offer my perspective as a neighbor of the church for over ten years, sharing the same block on West 70th Street, albeit the other end. I also joined the recently resurrected Woodhill -Edina Association a couple of months ago, unaware at that time of its president's views with respect to the expansion plans. Although I am not a member of Christ Presbyterian Church, its location at the end of the block was one of the factors that led me to purchase my house where I did. I liked the idea of something inherently "peaceful" at the other end of the block. In my view it adds a great deal to the charm and stability of the neighborhood, as well as being a positive economic asset to increased home and community values. I have found the church to be a good neighbor, making space available for local scout groups, and as a polling location during elections. Personally, I also liked the chimes. I'd strong encourage the Church to bring them back. Let those who don't like them move. ... .. ;,..:.. H. Brown, president of the Woodhill -Edina Association does not speak for me. i,,;:�zu, 1 uh,a6fue with his contention that STOPPING the Church's expansion plans would "protect our neighborhood." Any suggestions that the neighborhood would benefit from the Church being moved is in my opinion patently absurd. If my neighbors on Dun berry and other streets in the neighborhood are seriously concerned about the safety issues associated with pedestrian/auto joint use of such streets, I would encourage them to petition for sidewalks. They work for me! I have no objection to the expansion of the Church. My preference among the alternatives being considered would be to retain a direct public street (69th Street) connection between the East Frontage Road and Brittanv Road. Such a connection would seem on its face to provide a better direct connection for emergencies when the church parking lot is full. An alternative might be to require an emergency access easement through the parking lot with stripes to prohibit parking, but this adds an element of potential danger for both emergency responders and church members /children. Thanks for your attention. S' erely, 0700 es P. Uttley 4 4 West 70th Street Edina, MN 55435 -4060 C: Members, Edina Planning Commission —'Craig Larsen, Planner, City of Edina Peter Jarvis, c/o Christ Presbyterian Church Stephen H. Bown, president, Woodhill -Edina Association z o: Edina City C'ounciI and F"';.anninU Commission Fr: Mr. & Mrs. Paul Bremhorst Re: Christ Presbyterian Church Expansion F1ans- We w ou,d like to voice our strong objection to the expansion plans, particularly the parking 7!--.t expansion of Christ Presbyterian Church and the subsequent intrusion into our neighborhood. It seems to us that when a church ourgrows its spat?, it should not be allowed to start buying up residences in the neighborhood in order to expand. One needs only to look at the area of Grace Church on France Avenue to see what a negative impact aesthetically that expansion has caused. Now, that church needs more room and they will have to move anyway. If it is true, as stated in CPC's second neighborhood informational meeting, that 51 -55': of their membership, travels from outside Edina. then the expansion of the church no longer serves only this community and should not be allowed to scar our neighborhood with :.vo and a half acres of parking lot, it was also noted at the meeting, -hat the rapid growth of CPC membership was strongly related to the departure of Rev. Arthur Rouner from CW- onial "jrch of Edina. As pastoral careers Nrogress,,a similar change at CPC could leave this ne.ight,orhood :.+ith •.the „eyesore of blacktop in a residential area and -r: _.. :..,;,_ed facility. ?his, of course is speculation, but not an unreal projection into the future. A number of CPC members have said that Pastor John _-o=.*,y -i11 change congregations within the next few years. pie hope that the members of the planning commission and to ,city council would respect the fact that the citizens of Edlina rely on You to protect the safety, integrity, and beaut:: of Edina and t-. zonsj% —Jer `he .,- _.hes of 'he members ,- the community. We do nc. .:ant ncr'?aBeo '.raffi_ on Brittany Rd., nor Co we tjish to see our teleagured ":eiuhbors on 70th Street with more traffi =. :.e co no, : =an- ._ close .,ff 6?th Street and deny access to that end of Wood`, do not want to eliminate anymore green space in this alread;• squeezed subur'. .:!e'-e sire there are other environmental and financial implications of this proposed expan=_ i o -: , ;.::�; ; cn ,,,;F � o not fee 1 qua, i f ' ed to address. We .just ask you to empathize with the Edina citizens cf this neighborhood and ask ;:ourself if you would like to live wi th Gcreased traffic and across from a two and a. half acre park;ng lot. ?hanir vou. Paul and Cathy mhorst _121 Brittany Rd. Edir:a, IN 55435 Robert J. Hursh 4821 Dunberry Lane Edina. NIN 55435 February 8, .1990 Christ Presbyterian Church Building Committee Chairman 6901 Normandale Road Edina. MN 55435 Dear Building Committee: Two of my hobbies are vegetable gardening and watching purple martins. The only suitable location for these activities on my property is the area directly west of the house ... up to our common property line. Two trees on church property will soon block much of my sun. These trees also restrict access to my purple martin house. (schematic attached) I've heard that significant landscaping will be assiciated with your addition. I'm hopeful vou'll be at i, *n -nv concerns into the landscape plan by relocating these two trees to the new berm and replacinz them with shrubs or continuing the flowering crab planting with dwarfs along the slope toward the pines. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely. , esh Robe rt J. - , Henry T. Warner Co. LIFE AND CASUALTY INSURANCE February 23, 1998 Ladies and Gentlemen of the Edina Planning Commission 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424. (4� 41 NORTH 10th AVE. HOPKINS. MN 55343 My wife and I have been in residence at 6636 Brittany Road, Edina, MN 55435, since July of 1957, and have watched the growth, expansion, and encroachment of Christ Presbyterian Church with increasing dismay. At its present communicant strength, the increased traffic and congestion is more than we, the residents should have to endure, and if you allow their present plans to come to be, then all of the present nearby residents will suffer a marked reduction in property values. Also, the rezoning of the three houses which they now rent out, will cost the city valuable tax - revenue. Up to now. we have enjoyed living in the Woodhill section, and therefore, we ask that you not allow any more expansion of the church. Respectfully, HENRY/T. WARNER SALLY S. WARNER Februan 23, 1998 Planning Commission City of Edina 4801 West 50`h Street Edina. MN 55424 -1394 Several weeks ago we received a letter inviting us to attend an information session at city hall concerning the expansion on the site of Christ Presbyterian Church. We are not members of Christ Presbyterian Church. but we felt it important to take time to attend one of the meetings to learn about the church's plans and hear the neighbor's concerns. Although we are not one of the neighbors directly adjacent to the church. we do live in the Cornelia area around the church and feel you need to know our feelings concerning this expansion. We heard both sides during the presentation and both sides felt they had strong positions. We understand the concerns of the neighbors in not wanting the area around their houses changed. We also listened to the representatives of Christ Presbyterian Church. The church understood that the neighbor's real desire is for no expansion. They felt that they had listened and made adjustments to their plan that would address many of the neighbors concerns. Thus. this boils down to an issue of the greater good on which you, as a commission, are delegated to rule. The presence of strong local churches is very important in supporting the fabric of our community. In this case, we feel that the contribution this church makes through the positive influence of its presence and programs is important. The moderate expansion the church proposes, although an imposition on the neighbors, is necessary for the church to maintain its strong presence and ministry making the expansion desirable for our broader community. We sympathize with the neighbors who will feel the impact of the expansion. We feel the church has tried to moderate, as much as possible, this impact. We urge you to vote for the expansion for the greater good of the Edina Community. Thank you for this opportunity to share our feelings. We appreciate the work you do for our community Steve and Gloria Nelson 4205 Dunberry Lane Edina. %IN 55435 ` Michael and Beverly Young 6936 Hillcrest Lane Edina, MN 55435 (612) 920 -9259 February 23. 1998 Craic Larsen Director of Planning City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 Re: Christ Presbyterian Church Proposed Expansion Dear Mr. Larsen: My wife and I are homeowners in the Woodhill neighborhood. In early February, we leamed from the Woodhill -Edina Association (the "Association ") of the proposed expansion plan of the Christ Presbyterian Church ( "CPC "). In order to learn more about the plan, we attended the February 7, 1998 information meeting at the Edina City Hall. We are writing to express our concerns regarding the proposed CPC expansion. Specifically, we are trot,.hled. Z number of aspects of the CPC expansion: The CPC Steering Committee has failed to adequately address the Association's concerns regarding the possible detrimental impact of the expansion on the Woodhill neighborhood property values. CPC states that "[t]he fear that a church expansion would diminish property values, especially in a community such as Edina, is simply unfounded." CPC, however. has not produced any expert analysis to substantiate the quoted position. Moreover, this lack of independent verification of no adverse impact on the Woodhill neighborhood property values is even more troubling in light of the proposed increase in church size and parking area and the resulting increase in traffic volumes on 70`h street throughout the week. 2. During the February 7 meeting, the CPC Steering Committee presented a traffic expert, who rendered certain opinions as to the impact of the CPC expansion on Sunday traffic on 70`h street and the surrounding residential streets. Unfortunately, however, the CPC traffic study did not address the impact of increased traffic during the other days of the week. Clearly, the CPC expansion contemplates increases in non - sanctuary space. Moreover, at the February 7 meeting, the CPC Steering Committee explained that one of the justifications for the expansion is the need for more classroom and other non - sanctuary gathering space to offer more activities during the week. In light of this disclosure, we are troubled that the CPC Steering Committee conveniently ignored the traffic impact of the church's week day activities. Mr. Larsen February 23, 1998 Page 2 3. During the February 7 meeting, the CPC Steering Committee discussed the projected growth of the church's membership for purposes of budgeting the ability to service the new church expansion debt. However, as pointed out to Mr. Jarvis during the meeting, the church's projected membership growth will result in the church outgrowing its new space in 5 -7 years. Thus, the proposed expansion appears only to be a temporary, "stop -gap" measure to address the church's unfettered growth. For those young homeowners who desire to stay in the Woodhill neighborhood for many years. the church's continued growth and need for additional expansion in the future creates additional risk of property value diminition. Moreover, this concern over unfettered growth tends to chill any homeowner desire to materially improve their homesteads, resulting in additional loss of future property tax revenue. Needless to say, we are very concerned with the CPC expansion plans and the impact on the Woodhill neighborhood. We recommend that the CPC expansion be denied. If, however, the City Representatives decide to allow some degree of CPC expansion, then we request that certain legal restrictions be placed upon CPC to prevent any future expansion of the church facility. Specifically, and not intending to be exhaustive, the following might be imposed by the City of Edina: 1. A contractual arrangement whereby CPC promises not to (i) expand on existing property, and (ii) purchase additional real property adjacent to and within a certain distance radius of the existing CPC site; 2. Imposition of certain restrictive covenants in CPC real property documents and adjacent non -CPC real property that precludes (i) any future CPC real property acquisitions, and (ii) sale of property by an adjacent homeowner to CPC; and 3. Imposition of material liquidated damages ($5 -10 million) if CPC elects to breach the contractual arrangement set forth in 1 above. Thank you for your timely attention to this letter. Sincerely, Michael Young &Iule� ?ZZ-7 Beverly Young 0 i. 7 W- rj `�- o� ��� a- S � �J Uv� �U�� ' _ n_ _� 1 '�� .� � . �, �, � : �`� ' - �- . - ., ,. -`• -(, i �/ � � � /' / � �' / • � � i � � / , i . • e � � / � � I ' � � � / � / / � i � � � i I �� i � / 1 � � �� / � . i � i , � � / �, / !� r � i � i i / �,. �, � " � � �� � � z /z�,✓� �, �, ' / •� � � / � / � i � �' • / i�� �� ' � // : • � / � �, � � I � / / /i — � � _ � � �/ i i i 1/ � '� i i '� / / . � / / / i ��� Craig Larson Director of Planning 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Kr. Larson, Tim & Vicki Barzen 4713 Upper Terrace Edina, MN 55435 We are writing in regard to the proposed expansion of the Christ Presbyterian Church. We are against it. Having lived in this neighborhood for 18 years, we feel it is very nice the way it is and it should not be changed. Every day we use the 69th street access to our house, usually 6 -8 times /day. Closing this street would create inconvenience at the least and an unnecessay re- routing of traffic. This additional traffic through our neighborhc�ou would result in decreased property values and a decrease in the quality of life we presently enjoy. Our children join us in requesting your support in blocking this action which would serve only Christ Presbyterian Church and not the community. Please consider our side of this issue. If you feel you have to side with CPC, please vote for Plan 2. limiting the access to our neighborhood. Sincere y, i Tim and Vicki Barze o-e - -7 -/!g, - C-7 !7 77� 1,,Le IL I DONNA AND DAVID HAIYIILiQl\t 4805 West 70h Street Edina, Minnesota 55435 Mr. Craig Larsen 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Larsen, We are writing to you in your capacity as an Edina Planner to voice our com lete oopnosition to the plans for expansion of Christ Presbyterian Church in our neighborhood. We have seen all of the "options" proposed by the church and feel that none of them address our concerns or are consistent with the continued existence of the church in our neighborhood. You should be aware that we value the existence of a church in the neighborhood, but the plans set out by Christ Presbyterian extend beyond mere existence as a community church into a "mega" church. Our oopnostion is based on the following reasons (in no special order): • Increase in Size of the Sanctuary. The new sanctuary will seat 951 people, yet the old sanctuary will not be torn down and the fireside room (which is used at present as an overflow facility) will remain. This means that there will be seating for 1500 people, almost three times more than can now be seated. Expanded church size and parking mean more people and cars, and more and more programs all week long. There will be no respite for those of us who live here. • Dominance of the Architecture. As owners of a home that faces 706s street, city statute limited the height of fencing we were allowed to install when we wanted to shut out traffic noise caused by poor planning decisions in the past. Now the church wants to construct a huge building that will soar above the trees and will have a steeple —136 feet high (versus currently —95 feet). • Increase in Traffic Flow in Our Neighborhood. We have mentioned above our concerns that more people will mean more cars coming and going to the church. In addition, all of their proposals require shifting the parking lot exit east almost opposite our property line. At present the exit, although objectionable, is in neutral territory. In three of the four new proposals, traffic will filter from the Woodhill neighborhood to 70'h street by the exit, thereby putting us and our immediate neighbors in the middle of increased traffic flow, and therefore at hazard. The church commissioned a traffic flow survey that had so many design flaws as to make it laughable. The people in the church do not live in this neighborhood and therefore do not experience what we experience. • Change in the Environment of Our Home. Our quality of life is threatened by all the proposals, and although the church has professed to listen, it has not. The pastor DO\ \.t AND DAVID N.a.\IILTO\ 4805 [Vest 701x' Street Edina, Minnesota 55435 Page lives outside of the neighbor hood and almost 50% of the parishioners do also. To them, our opposition is a nuisance and they intend to soldier on regardless. If they so much want this mega church, they should move to where they can have it. Don't let it occur here! Decrease in Value of Our Propert y. The church maintains that their expansion will not affect our property values. Quite to the contrary. The mega church that is being planned will be akin to a shopping mall and will have the same effects on the value of our property. We are approaching old age. Our house is our major investment and we cannot afford to have a calamity such as this occur. We do not want homes torn down (thereby increasing the tax burden on the remaining homeowners in the town), lawns covered with concrete or additional traffic on our streets. Your approval of any of their proposed options would be detrimental to our neighborhood aesthetically and to our quality of life. You would not embrace it in your neighborhood and we do not support it in ours. We urge that you deny the petition by Christ Presbyterian Church. Yours truly , (Z�� hTU . David W. Hamilton Donna N Hamilton February 21, 1998 Dear Mr. Larsen: We are twenty year residents of the Edina Woodhill neighborhood and have numerous concerns regarding the proposed expansion of Christ Presbyterian Church (CPC): 1. The loss of integrity of the neighborhood. This is a beautiful little neighborhhod with nicely kept homes appreciating noticeably in value and with great access to shopping, entertainment, etc. We do not want to see the neighborhood chopped up with its green meadows converted to a parking lot area and more buildings! Why should the church now be allowed to expand beyond its existing boundary? The property was zoned appropriately and for a specific reason years ago. Now due to poor planning and a lack of foresight on their part they are trying to impose their selfish demands on the neighbors. 2. Increased traffic through our neighborhood and adjoining streets (CPC projects a 35% increase in traffc volume). 70th Street is like a freeway now during certain times of the day and week. The traffic study submitted by CPC is flawed in that it did not include Normandale Service Road, nor the streets past West Shore Drive. Further, the Woodhill neighborhood has no sidewalks for pedestrians. Streets like Dunberry can be crowded with speeding cars after church events. Any increase to membership will only exacerbate this problem. When do we change this -when a child is killed or seriously, injured ?! 3. Potentially diminished property values in an area that has been one of the most desireable areas in Edina. Many residents are counting on their home to be a major portion of their overall equity portfolio when they retire and don't want its value eroded. 4. Legitimate questions have been raised regarding water runoff with loss of yards and storm drains on 69th Street. These need to be addressed before proceeding. This project is clearly driven by the inflated ego of the church pastor (for his own personal and career gain) and by a small group of influential mem bers within the church. Many members are not in favor of the project! Will the church be able to sustain the type of membership and contributions necessary to service the debt of this large project, and beyond the time when the pastor and these members are no longer a part of the church? In closing, we are counting on your support to restrict this project so that the neighborhood integrity is maintained. We have no problem with the church undertaking some type of expansion as long as it does not involve the rezoning of property they own. Sincerely, AL"u-1 Richard & B 'e Fole 4804 Dunberry Lane l TO: Craig Larson, Director of Planning City of Edina FROM: HAL & WYNN MEEKER 4800 WILFORD WAY Edina, MN. 55435 phone 922 -5679 RE: PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE BY CHRIST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH We are writing this letter to voice our strong opposition to the proposed zoning change by Christ Presbyterian Church. Unfortunately we will not be able to attend the first meeting of the Planning Commission due to the fact we will be out of town. We have closely followed this proposed development and have signed two petitions stating our opposition. We agree with the petition and would like to specifically state our opposition to the expanded parking lot. We are concerned that a parking lot so removed from the core of the church at off hours when there would be no church supervision will present any for car traffic and possible criminal behavior. Furthermore, with the exception 'of about 3 hours on Sunday morning and 3 hours sometimes on Tuesday morning this expanded area will be vacant which is a gross under utilization of prime residential property and creates an unwelcome intrusion into our neighbor- hood. We live very close to the church and use the church access to 70th Street several times a day and almost always return home by the frontage road and 69th Street. It has become very evident to us that the current parking lot is seldom more that half full and indeed most times when we drive through there is only a handful of cars parked. We have lived in this very fine neighborhood since the fall of 1965, raised 5 children who all attended elementary, junior high and senior high school in Edina. It was a particularly fine, quiet neighborhood in which to raise a family and we certainly hope it will be preserved as it is for future generations. Sincerely, Hal and Wynn Meeker February 18, 1998 February 21, 1998 Edina Planning Commission 4801 'lest 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Dear Member: .t has been brought to our attention that Christ Presbyterian Churc^ on the corner of 70th Street and Normandale Road is planning a three to five million dollar expansion. We are writing to voice our strong opposition to this rezoning. ',fie believe it sates in the E"_..- .- ,., Ord-I ance that the objective is to "Maintain, protect and enhance single family detached dwelling neighborhoods as the dominant land use and to control the use, developement and expansion of certain non - residential uses in the Single :amiiy Unit District in order to :educe or eliminate undesirable impacts of such non - residential use." Ue _,eel the existing Church is an asset to the community, 3ut, our objections are as follows: l;minaticn of homes and re lacing them with blacktop is unfair to ad.;acent home owners and will lower the property values of the entire area. *The expansion will add additional traffic congestion to the rein bornood. *The expansion would be overbuilding for the for the ground area. `_uvinz the four homes by the Church is an effort to influence the deliberations on the rezoning. ?lease consider the negative impact the project will have cn our neighborhood. 'fe are counting on you to support this long and standing ordinance. Sincerely, 4 W & -, �/- J� ha/ Awt�*-- Dale and 3art ?ledges 4729 'Milford 'fay Edina, ::Y 55435 Id a- ow , 73F Z, -4-a- s `e-7 e. e -C -CZ - L C- 4014 '7 (:, -, 1 Ll ad 71— - z7c� e- e r__ JCL IPIC41.., '_ ce--o i Coe d IL C- C 91L_ie_.:� oe-- /00 '001 ZA- ee'. I'illsbur�� ill U'l l Wi � C' v a-L V1, i � � :1� � ��r� ! ,106 j�. K-,P0 (i-! ?X j�c� ✓i ;,:: 7 �ii'bL .) r 1- �, t l,� C 4 � �lsr liicva1 h. L.}� =. 1 �� L , �, . ��-i i L' i r \.•' �"'�,., .YvL'I •' C" +- ! �•C•L LK.v� LL .� '1. T ; '-•� 'I y ! r C c' 4 c: rt % : • w 'M t,&-e !' . / �'� I, �, • tr I ' ` -- l,,.,, c-t 1.G-v c i % !� i.�•y� TlA L t, t1�� j'V(, �•:�.� lip- Sri . / : . l /\ 'i\, . '. �.'� �, • _. J r • � � , � •� rte. ` 7Bryw t Cj Z . ?n-L ct% un ✓ -- - � L 0),,, -,Lb, �� l `t14 C.Lvr'rCti.T -tom t\% �+% c, PC. i +V ' �`M c I- �•� (� � uti� ti 1 ,;= Ctci.� rtiz c�� c:, u� � 6 L r I'�' � . . J prL CA- l r c'C:CL`/ ` r i (,: 'v r ti l 6%,%. � r4 �J,� e4. to 1 I_ �•� 'n•,{ �j 1%� � +� i •`. I r 'v` • �.:�c.• Ifs l.• r {/ � L r4 �J,� 4408 West 70th Street Edina, MN 55435 February 21, 1998 Dear Sir or Madam: We want to express our opposition to Christ Presbyterian Church's proposed plans to expand. Any further expansion will increase traffic on an already congested 70th street and through the neighborhood. We're also concerned about parking on 70th. We have a hard enough time getting in and out of our driveway as it is. Any expansion will only make this problem worse. Edina is too built -up. We can't afford to lose more green space. Any further expansion by the church will be to the detriment of the neighborhood. The City of Edina should be working to reduce the flow of traffic through residential. areas instead of increasing it. You should stop the proposed expansion by the church! Sincerely, George E. Moyzis George L. Moyzis Kristine V. Moyzis VC, -7 013 IILA- L y.[. _/l L L L I- L e, L-L 7 --d -pme c_ L)V L .,IeL. 4t .-L,. A---t e4- IL ell- 4L A-; JA L,;. 43 --et, er •k ..,L. %Z.A -Z 7 61VU cL Lir Cze � 013 • Ann and Bruce McPheeters 4920 Poppy Lane Edina, Minnesota 55435 February 18, 1998 Craig Larsen Director of Planning City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Dear Mr. Larsen: We are members and "neighbors" of Christ Presbyterian Church ( "CPC ") since the Highway 100 access from Poppy Lane is affected by traffic on 70th Street. We appreciate the City's willingness to consider all views on the proposed expansion of CPC, and encourage the City to approve the building project and parking expansion, using one of the alternatives proposed by CPC which best fits the concerns of everyone. We have lived in Edina most of our lives and in September 1997 moved from 5504 Brookview to 4920 Poppy Lane, in part to be closer to CPC as our neighborhood church. Edina is blessed with more vibrant and growing neighborhood churches than possibly any other community in the country. When we visit cities in other states, we often ask ourselves -- "where are the churches "? We are thankful to live here. A vibrant church, almost by definition, is a growing church. Many churches which do not grow, eventually die. It is sad to see vacant church buildings like the Lutheran Church of the Master on France Avenue in Edina, and the uncertainty placed on the immediate neighborhood. Fortunately, most of Edina's churches have vibrant ministries attracting young families and people of all ages. If as a community, we force growing churches to move away or encourage churches to become stagnant and eventually die away, what is left of our neighborhoods and sense of community? As parents of three school -aged children, we are thankful for church youth programs which provide healthy alternatives to gangs and the many downward spirals facing youth today. Since there is little available land in Edina to plant new neighborhood churches, we need to preserve the ones we have. We believe that CPC should act like any good neighbor. We understand that CPC has presented several alternatives to reduce traffic flow in the immediate neighborhood and improve sight lines with trees and other landscaping. These certainly add costs to the project, but we believe the members of CPC are willing to incur those added costs as a good neighbor. The concerns of the neighbors -- especially those in the immediate vicinity of the church - -are legitimate and should be heard. Property values are important to every resident. We believe that the church provides an excellent buffer between Highway 100 and the neighborhood, and that buffers are important to help mitigate the negative effects of a busy highway so close to a neighborhood. The site plans we have seen make the church property more attractive and more effective as a buffer to Highway 100. February 18, 1998 Page 2 l CPC has continued to grow but has now stretched the capacity of its 30 -year old sanctuary. People have expressed concerns about uncontrolled expansion of the church property in the future. If a new sanctuary is built in 1998, eventually in 2028 or perhaps a shorter or longer span of time, the 1998 sanctuary could become inadequate. But that could also be said for the width of Highway 100 or 70th Street in 2028. None of us controls every future event that affects our neighborhoods. We all hope that our neighbors will continue to act neighborly and not, for example, paint their house bright orange. But one neighbor does not control everything that another neighbor can and cannot do. Instead, we need to be respectful of one another and treat others as we also want to be treated. That builds community. We believe CPC has been a good neighbor to both the immediate neighborhood and to all of Edina, and that CPC is committed to see that continue. If CPC is prevented from growing and later loses its vitality as a church, the affects of a dying church could impose far more uncertainty on the neighborhood than the expansion plan being considered today. We hope the City Council approves the expansion, using one of CPC's proposed alternatives that best addresses everyone's concerns. Lets do what is needed to have vibrant neighborhoods and vibrant neighborhood churches. The two go hand in hand and together increase not only residential property values, but the entire value and attractiveness of Edina as a community. Thank you for your time and service as Director of Planning. Sincerely, Abl, Ann and Bruce McPheeters t February 22, 1998 Christ Presbyterian Church Attn: Polly Bowles 6901 Normandale Road Edina, MN 55435 Re: CPC Expansion Master Plans Dear Polly: Thank you for sending to our families attention the history of Christ Presbyterian Church(CPC), the background on CPC's long range planning and ultimately the alternatives being considered after considerable neighborhood input. I would encourage Christ Presbyterian Church to stay the course and proceed with your plans. We as citizens of Edina and more importantly neighbors of CPC need organizations as yourself. When people worship, reach out and contribute to the well being of a community as well as the immediate neighborhood we as citizens need to applaud. You must continue to worship, reach out and enhance the quality of life for all individuals directly or indirectly influenced by the presence of Christ Presbyterian Church. Although my family has chosen to worship at Wooddale Church(Eden Prairie), we fully support the expansion plans of Christ Presbyterian Church. We love living in our community and recognize that a vibrant community expects and needs vibrant organizations as Christ Presbyterian Church. Regards, Gary, Nancy and Abby Thacher 6901 Southdale Road Edina, MN 55435 February 9, 1998 Mr. Craig Larsen Director of Planning City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Larsen, As new residents of the Woodhi11 neighborhood, we are writing to you to voice our firm opposition to the Christ Presbyterian Church (CPC) proposed expansion. These plans are currently scheduled to be presented to the Edina Planning Commission on February 25. We recently attended a meeting in which CPC's plans were presented to us and are gravely concerned. Thank you for taking a moment out of your busy schedule to read our concerns. Our home is located on the northeast corner of Brittany Road and Wilford Way, and.our living room and sunroom overlook the south end of Brittanv Road. A substantial part of the appeal of our home when we bought it late last summer was the lovely views of our attractive neighborhood. We are greatly dismayed to learn, after only a,few months in our new home, of the intention of CPC to replace this lovely view with a parking lot, which we would overlook! Although attempts have clearly been made to design the parking lot as attractively as possible, with landscaping, etc.. we would still consider a parking lot of this size (500+ - 600+ spaces) to be a blight on the neighborhood. not to mention a risk to our property value. We would not have purchased our home for the price we did, and perhaps would not have considered buying i'; expansion already been in place. We view the proposed expansion as something Y�ti� 'r�cr do °a. -from the 'beauty, safety and peace of our home and community. A major concern to us is the issue of safety. We moved to Edina from Minneapolis in part to find a safer environment in which to raise our children. The idea of them playing in the front yard, or getting on and off the school bus with a large parking lot across the street, people frequently coming and going, increased traffic flow, etc., is unsettling. We are also concerned about the possible risks which accompany having an empty parking lot surrounded by foliage in a residential area after dark. We are disturbed at the thought of having to bear the burden of living across the street from a large, unsecured parking lot and the unsolicited late night activities it could invite. An additional concern to us, after attending the informational meeting regarding the proposed expansion is the timetable for construction of Phase 1. According to church representatives, they would begin construction in June of this year and it would continue for 10 - 12 months! This is definitely not how we planned to spend our first summer in our new home. This is a residential neighborhood and we are trying to do our best to preserve that for the benefit of our children. In closing, we ask you to take a moment to look out of your living room window and imagine the CPC expansion, and parking lot replacing your current view. How would you vote on the issue if it were proposed in your neighborhood? We implore you to defeat this proposal and preserve the integrity, safety and beauty of our neighborhood. Thank you for your attention and support. Chuck and Vicki Densinger 4816 Wilford Way Edina, MN 55435 a To: Members of The City Of Edina- Planninu Commission Members of The City of Edina -City Council Craig Larsen: Director of Planning, City of Edina From: Steve Brown: President, Woodhill -Edina Association 49 RE: February 25th, 1998 Planning Commission Meeting - ')ate: February 19, 1998 I spoke with Craig Larsen regarding the process for the upcoming planning commission meeting. He indicated that he sends you a package on the Friday before your meetings for you to review. Earlier today, I received a copy of CPC's formal application as well as a copy of Peter Jarvij letter that was sent to neighbors in our area. You were all copied on it as well. Time prevents me from responding to his letter and their application, and still get this letter to Craig in time to put it into your package. However, I can assure you that I will be responding in detail to both of these documents as there a number of blatant misrepresentations and half truths that must addressed prior to Wednesday's meeting. As it relates to Wednesdav's meeting, I would like you to understand our position on a number of the kev issues or positions as it relates to the proposed expansion. We will elaborate on these issues in our presentation. • We must immediately divorce CPC's attempted union between religion and land use in evaluating this issue. The current debate is not predicated on the merits of CPC as a church or its programs. We agree that churches are a vital part of our community and that CPC provides a valuable service to the city of Edina. That is not the issue. This is simply a land use issue, CPC's application and Peter Jarvis' 2 -19 -98 letter both site references to decisions that were arrived at "prayerfully." I respect their right to prayer but must remind the city that it must not accept prayer as a feasible defense for supporting a position or rejecting reasonable alternative solutions. To accept one parties prayer as credible, is to validate or confirm their beliefs w Ue simultaneously invalidating the beliefs of someone who does not share their position. • CPC has eclipsed its original mission as a neighborhood church. Thru the physical expansion of its campus, increased membership from outside of Edina, and attraction of non - church groups and programs, CPC has effectively become a "magnet" church for the southwest metro area of the Twin Cities. While approximately- 50% of the members reside in Edina, only approximately 5% live in the immediate neighborhood. Furthermore, based on CPC's numbers approximately 40% live outside of Edina as far away as 5 miles away and another 10% live more than 5 miles away. • Despite recent misrepresentations, CPC has NOT worked with or communicated with the neighborhood to resolve our concerns. You will hear a great deal more on that issue in my forthcoming letter. • CPC and :is needs have chanced_ not the neighborhoods. Whv do we need to change to accommodate their growth'' v V • The city of Edina, as well as the southwest suburbs, have experienced significant growth in recent years. As a result %v a have seen huge increases in traffic that threaten the quality of our neighborhoods and the safety_ of our children. • CPC has ien out critical facts about their proposed plan that will create even greater safety risks, more congestion and negatively impact our neighborhood. • CPC wouid have you believe that this is the only feasible option available which allows them the abilitv to continue growing. They would have you believe that the 7 other alternatives have been researched and simply don't work. While this is clearly the most convenient and most desirable for the Church. it is not the only feasibie alternative available to them. It is also the least desirable alternative for the neighborhood. We are requesting that you execute your duties to serve the best interests of the residents of Edina. and tell CPC that this is not an acceptable alternative. That they need to reevaluate the 7 other alternatives and find a solution therein. I look forward to discussing these issues in greater detail next Wednesday. Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter. Jay and Sue Stickney 4812 Wilford Wav Edina. MN. 554335 Februan, 17. 1998 Mr. Craig Larsen Director of Planning City of Edina 4801 West 50`" Street Edina 1%4N. 5424 -1394 Subject: Christ Presbyterian Expansion Dear Mr. Larsen. We are oppose to the expansion plans of Christ Presbyterian Church. We moved to the Woodhill neighborhood in December of 1996 `�'r purposely sought a 'quiet' neighborhood. For the previous 16 years. Nve had lived with the noise and dirt of a freeNvay and a busy street. WPC's expansion plans would create an environment just like the one we came here to escape!, We do not feel that CC's expansion plans are in the best interest of the neighborhood for ( btut not limited to.) the foilowina reasons: • the satety of neighborhood children is in jeopardy due to the increased levels of traffic • destruction of single family homes in exchange for parking areas is an unacceptable trade • closing or relocation of 69`" street is unacceptable • a larger more open area for parking will increase the dust and noise in the area We urge you A10T to approve uny of CPC's expansion plans. Thank VUU. Sincerely. Ag- a "( Brian and Diane Martens 7112 Bristol Boulevard Edina, MN 55435 612 927 -9183 February 11, 1998 Mayor Glenn Smith Edina City Hall 4801 West 50"' Street Edina, MN 55424 RE: Proposed expansion of Christ Presbyterian Church Dear Mayor Smith: I am writing to express my opposition to any expansion by Christ Presbyterian Church for the following reasons: A. There are currently in excess of 20,000 cars per day trq'v�+ina -)n ±he stretch of 70'' Street between Highway 100 and France Avenue. Traffic levels on this street have increased by 66% in ten years, but the greatest increase, 48 %, occurred between 1993 and 1995. Any expansion by the church would only worsen an already intolerable situation. B. As a result of the increases in traffic on 70"' Street,- Cornelia Drive, and 72nd Street. parents now drive their children to school rather than allowing them to walk and cross these busy and dangerous streets and intersections with few sidewalks. There is congestion in the parking lot at the school, congestion on Cornelia Drive, and it is, in my opinion, only a matter of time until a child is hurt or killed by a careless driver, many of whom are cut - through commuters. Parent are appalled that their children, ages 5 -9, are expected to cross 70Th Street during rush hour when the school day ends because the school district has mandated them as walkers. C. This neighborhood cannot survive any more traffic. The only way we can currently get in or out of our neighborhood is by using Cornelia Drive where there is a signal light. Trying to turn left onto or off of 70I' Street via Wooddale or West Shore Drive has become an impossibility in the last few years. Trying to turn north on France at 72nd Street is also impossible. Hazelton Road is accessible only when there is not a funeral in progress with cars lining the residential streets all the way onto Bristol Blvd. D. The homes on 70"' Street, single family- residences,_ have become devalued -as - - a result of -the increases of traffic on that street. My heart goes out to those homeowners who continually put the for sale sign out only to find that no one is interested in buying these houses. E. The comprehensive plan drafted twenty years ago indicated a need for sidewalks on 72 "d Street and other areas of the Cornelia neighborhood and still there are none. We cannot allow our children on 72nd Street because it is not safe. Studies have shown there is a 52% greater risks to pedestrians who walk on heavily traveled roads with no sidewalks. My husband and I have discussed the possibility of moving out of this neighborhood for the reasons I have just stated. I do not feel my children are safe in the streets, the school district has not taken action to protect the students from hazardous walking conditions, and life in the Cornelia neighborhood does not seem tranquil when the residents are continually being presented with plans for further encroachment. I feel this neighborhood deserves special consideration because we are in a very vulnerable situation. If Edina is committed to preserving the integrity of its residents, then the city must not allow any expansion by Christ Presbyterian Church. Respectfully yours. Diane Martens cc: City Council Members Planning Commission Members DOUGLAS & TERESA TUEMG 4812 West 70th Street Edina, Minnesota 55435 612/922-8065 February 20, 1998 Mr. Craig Larsen Director of Planning City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Larsen: When the projected growth plans of Christ Presbyterian Church finally get underway, ours will be without doubt the most immediately and dramatically affected family and household in Edina. Our home will disappear and we will have to move. So we have thought about this a great deal. In our lifetime together, we have three times been participant observers in the dramatic growth of established suburban churches which, because they amore daiiig theii work so well and so attractively, were drawing people not only from all over the neighborhood and the community, but also from miles around to participate in the programs and services and life that were being offered in these churches. So they simply had to grow - to meet the needs of the neighborhood and the community and the people that were knocking at their door. We first saw this happen in Minnesota, then in Massachusetts, and now we are observing it again in Minnesota. In addition to that, as a sometime student of these things, I have had a chance to observe this growth in Darien, CT and Wheaton, IL. In each of these five cases, when the growth began to occur there were voices who came forward, always only a few voices, but very loud, strident, and frightened voices, who cried, "Oh, this must not happen because the growth of a church will mean the diminishment of our community. The increased value of a church will devalue our community. The expansion of a church will shrink the attractiveness of our community. And all of this will surely happen because of changes in traffic patterns and property values and the attraction of people who are not like us and not a part of us." In each of these cases, including the current one, I have observed that none of these devaluations came true or is coming true to this date- not in Boston, not in Edina, not in Darien, CT, not in Wheaton. IL and not in the Christ Presbyterian Church case. There is nothing inevitable about the increased February 20. 1998 Page 2 value of a healthy church and its services to the life of a community that diminishes the value of living in that community or should impact upon the property value of the people living near it. The Lynnhurst community of Minneapolis is not a slum because the largest Lutheran Church in the world, Mount Olivet Lutheran Church, has grown up in that neighborhood. Quite the opposite, it is a wonderful neighborhood to live in and has been so for almost half a century. We currently live smack -dab beside West 70th Street as renters of .Christ Presbyterian Church. In that regard. we live across the street from Arneson Acres, a wonderful arboretum, and the Edina Historical Society, where I have several times gone just for the fun of it to read about the history of Edina, and particularly of the little farmhouse in which I live, the old Smiley house, which has been here for almost a century. In the course of the that enjoyable reading I have learned two things for sure about the community of Edina. One is that within the span of merely two generations this community has charged, or: b °ing primarily a rural farming community to being a teeming, mode .::'; �::: .�., curb. And West 70th Street, which used to be just a cow . path between the pastureland which is now Southdale and the dairy at Cahill Road, is now a major metropolitan highway between shopping centers and an urban belt. It is also clear to me that within two generations Edina will change dramatically again to something else which is appropriate and responsive to the metropolitan community of the Twin Cities area. It will not remain, it cannot remain, it never did remain a single, pristine. Courier & Ives image in somebody's mind. It was always changing and is changing to this moment. Since there is no chance that Edina will not change, the only question is, Will the change that goes on in Edina be change for the better or change for the worse? In that regard, it seems to me quite clear that one really good way to encourage positive change is to encourage the growth of those institutions which nurture people and nurture families and nurture common life in the community, viz., schools, parks, hospitals, churches, - -yes, churches. And if these institutions are vibrant and lively enough that they need to grow and adapt and respond to what they are doing, then it would be absolutely fool- hardy to resist them and oppose them. Those are the institutions that give this community life and have for a century. Now, in my sixth decade of life, it seems likely to me that what is really being feared and resisted here is just change itself. I' February 20, 1998 Page 3 The community of Edina has half a dozen strong, vibrant, community service oriented churches that are an invaluable part of the life of this town. You would want to nurture change in those institutions that keeps them lively and responsive and growing. You would not want to stand on the curb and say- - "Oh, whatever you do, you must never change that church, that school, that hospital, that park, because that might upset my driveway!" That is absolutely foolish. And although we will be the first to go when this change occurs, we are delighted at what Christ Presbyterian Church brings to this community and has, just by being a neighbor, brought to the life of our family. We hope that you will support all appro riate change for this church while doing the best you can to educate t4wldhninfonl4ed voices that resist it. Doug and Teresa Tueting MR. & MRS. GLENN E. RAY 4801 WEST 70TH ST. EDINA, MN 55435 920 -4315 February 7, 1998 To: Edina City Council Members Edina Planning Commission Members Subject: Christ Presbyterian Church Expansion Plans Sir/Madam: Please vote against the proposed expansion of Christ Presbyterian Church. We do not want a "megachurch" taking over the neighborhood. There is enough traffic on West 70th as it is and we certainly hope you understand adding a 950+ sanctuary with a 650+ slot parking lot will make matters even worse than they are already. For those who do not live in the area 24 hours per day, it is easy to let the church have what it wants. It seems almost ironic that those who will make F-° °cision on this expansion do not live in the immediate area that will be affected. We will have to live with your decision, and if you do approve this plan, we will have a daily reminder of what and who made our lives more congested and who lowered our property values. Almost half of this congregation, and its pastor, live in Eden Prairie. May we suggest that perhaps that is where the church should establish a second church? That way they can expand and we can have our neighborhood and our property values. We ask that you think very long and very hard before making this decision. It will be one that will certainly be remembered. Sincerely, Glenn E. Rayj. '� /�� Connie Ray February 11, 1998 Dear Council and Commission Members, We are writing to express our concerns about the intended expansion of Christ Presbyterian Church which you are about to consider. The scope of the planned expansion is quite troubling, especially in light of the impact we are already feeling from the traffic generated by the church at its present size. We believe that a church of the size contemplated by CPC's plans, and the traffic it will inevitably generate, is totally incompatible with the residential character of the neighborhood. Given the volume of traffic and congestion already prevailing on 70th Street, West Shore Drive and adjacent streets, we simply do not see how the higher levels of usage which the expanded church would attract can be safely and conveniently accommodated. Finally, given the remarkable rate of growth in its congregation in recent years, it seems quite likely that CPC will ultimately be required to relocate in any event. In that case, the neighborhood will have been- irreparably harmed without meeting the church's long term needs anyway. That would truly be a tragedy. We have supported CPC on issues of this nature in the past. We have been participants in some of its programs. We are not "anti- church" by any means. However, the needs of this congregation have simply grown to the point. where they can no I,)nner: hp.ccc^modated in ,;a this location without fundamentally, destroying the residential character of this neighborhood, to the permanent detriment of all its residents. That is not consistent with good public policy, which you are charged with implementing. For these reasons, we urge you to vote to prevent the planned expansion of Christ Presbyterian Church. We will be watching for your vote. Thank you for your attention. ncerely, Bob & Carmie Hobbins 4708 Upper Terrace Edina, MN 55435 �ajc& -C� Q William C. Hamer 4709 Upper Terrace Edina, MN 55435 January 31, 1998 Edina City Planning Commission 4801 W 50`h Street Edina, MN 55424 I would like to voice my support for the proposed expansion plans of Christ Presbyterian Church in the Woodhill neighborhood of Edina. I am a homeowner in the Woodhill neighborhood and I have been in the same home since 1980. I live about 2 blocks from Christ Presbyterian Church. Churches, along with schools and parks, are an integral part of a residential neighborhood, and they add to the vitality of the neighborhood. They deserve a different kind of consideration by the community than businesses. The proposed expansion of Christ Presbyterian Church contributes to the continued strength of my neighborhood, similar to an improvement to Lake Cornelia Park or an expansion of Cornelia Elementary School. Of course churches, especially larger congregations like Christ Presbyterian Church draw members from outside the community, but that is a normal and appropriate aspect of the growth and diversity of successful congregations. I am not a member of Christ Presbyterian Church, and I have never been affiliated with it in the past. However, I am currently considering joining Christ Presbyterian Church. I am concerned, however, that its present facilities are inadequate for its congregation, considerably smaller than some of the other churches in Edina. Sincerely, 4tx�;�/ William C. Hamer Dean and Brenda Knutson 6900 Creston Road .` Edina, MN 55435 920 -6925 February 3, 1998 Mr. Craig Larsen Director of Planning City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street 'CA;",l IUM S r4 ?4 Dear Mr. Larsen: As a resident in the Woodhill/Creston Hills neighborhood, we would like to voice our approval of the expansion proposed by Christ Presbyterian Church. We have been members and neighbors of CPC for ten years. The church has become an important part of our family's life. Our children are able to walk to this neighborhood church for activities, utilize the facilities for Boy Scout meetings, and shoot baskets in the gymnasium. As adults, we vote at CPC, attend Bible studies, worship and mee4.fri nc3_s there. The expansion of the church may impact traffic in the neighborhood, and we are willing to accept the increased traffic levels as a trade -off for the continued vibrant positive force of CPC in the Woodhill neighborhood. Healthy neighborhood churches have proven to increase community property values. We expect that CPC will be sensitive and address, as best they can, the concerns of the neighbors in the immediate area with regards to landscaping, parking, etc. Nevertheless, this church is an important part of the neighborhood and should be given the opportunity to continue its growth in harmony with the neighbors, of whom we are one. Sincerely, Dean and Brenda Knutson Cov.vn..uG /Yl�,,,,/iu,LaJ at L4 Q C/ �iC;�cua y 16 0 �J �` b.cci�i .�i�/ �co' 2rf.ltrL yew C� /t2l�c��e�i,osQ. Cervr�.c.t.Zo-��. tBG „ri w /7ta�> �vu, {¢,•<,v iaa u At 644�d., IL �o �.Eo-Z` . �.c.ty' 't'�c' �� ass- ��,(r -�•yk mod- LA .t�Cot Of AL 0 a-o1,ciG�� eooL-"� c'-&c) �cweuG�F...JG- taro -- CJ �G �/i �..oi �p.�.i.�tsC� .LJ�I i.G�,t,Gn,� �s+ ��. �.✓4C¢k, F' �n.. Ed,�xa�. 70` � /uc, G et Ot �� � • � �, d- codoCa.Lc_ . U r� . � U 4,,n� - 1 �� /h Al ��y3S Richard F. Schneider 6905 West Shore Drive April 30,1998 Glenn Smith, Mayor City Offices of Edina Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Smith, I am writing this letter to express my concern about the issues surrounding the Christ Presbyterian Church (CPC) project to expand its facilities in the Woodhill neighborhood of Edina, in which my family lives. I am concerned about this project and the process that has gone on to resolve the differences about it. I have legitimate concerns about the effect that this expansion will have on the quality of the neighborhood. They include: • Changing traffic patterns. • Increased traffic. • Demolition of existing housing units. • A larger, more imposing church structure and parking area that changes the neighborhood landscape, that projects a more commercial environment. • In general, and maybe most importantly, a fear of what the expansion will have on the overall character of the neighborhood. Please listen to our concerns at the City Council meeting on Monday May 4, and vote to stop this expansion. Thank -you. Sincere y, Cam- Richard F. Schneider n i -rr+-1 »o �c • =+a W I1`IJLUW rR 1 IN 111VU b1GJ�21�49G5 1= . 1��/1�6 May 4, 1998 Mayor Glenn Smith Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN. 55424 Dear Mayor Smith: This letter is written to express my wife Michelle's support along my support for Christ Presbyterian Church's proposed expansion. We have been members at Christ Presbyterian along with our five children, ages 9 and under, for over three and a half years and although we do not live in the immediate neighborhood of the church, we do live in the Cornelia neighborhood north of 70th Street and south of 66th Street. I would also like to note that both my wife and I grew up and have lived most of our lives within approximately one mile of the church and because our children now attend Comelia school we will in all likelihood remain in the Comelia neighborhhood for many years. Thank you for your time in reading this letter. Respectfully, Tom Terwiilig 6704 Southdale Rd. Edina, MN. 55435 922 -0678 C- t_tells j Goan 6360 cR,-d 'jrox -Pans Edina. -Alanasota 55436 D- ZZ za' c Z' Y Z7 Sze clo�l 7 ee- / 6 `� C1•- Y� \ , l �� i � y L! 1.L v 1 L l � � l 1 K v { I �� �� l C L v' Y1 �: ► 1 G, r� c 17 c `I- { C. v'1 -to I k-a- cf II1 ✓ { S� Iry -�� S��,� e �- c:: �' �`1 v c �� , Z C` ,, ti 1 C. �� C ci C\ kx C_ --l--6 t� L c:d Ve- u S C ✓, S vr) U-�, -7C S�• i:�; 1ti1 ►m cv- P CL Y' i5 r'1 C� -this tj a-V-Q— l.� ��� S 1 r�l `� ✓ � i�l S C S LL-V'-Q- {/1 C �\utw ck � c: Co.-4e c� a4, Tlu- �e r)I kQ_✓\C\S tC 1L �:� �' , i1C� �.r1C V- e. CL/)e-, hV Ck- I Lk (-- 5 vY) 7 v C{ C .,-1 i (2 S') (I an \1-\ LL V-\'& -1 e S , CPL. fku 4-- ���c•�K �• 6LC.c r'Yl On Q- r'1 k 1C t L` I ��. a 10. l S CLL C v�l �� ✓1 �' ci v^e, "CCU 1► � � ��� ► � -� ::..mac 5 ; �-, c�1�.. -�` .,-, �� l,c.,� 4� c• ���e. � , J ° �. �`C�. cL wn CL- CrL o L&L '�;t l L, C U -C 6'e s k, y). e VO c Cp , Chh� wc-� J -I Q I 51.Z ci l� l '•-i' l S IS C,� v v W Cl �iL cc� '-h-ve- iCLLS oil CL . � LtZc�b�.Tl� S��e�.��; '-i1Z� �a►�����ti�� �c,L�.,�:� Henry T. Warner Co. LIFE AND CASUALTY INSURANCE May . 1, 1998 Edina City Council 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424. Ladies & Gentlemen: (4NT 41 NORTH 10th AVE. HOPKINS, MN 55343 My wife and I have been residents of 6636 Brittany Road since July 1, 1957, and have raised five children there, and have enjoyed our neighborhood very much. Now, Christ Presbyterian has tried to take over a large part of the neighborhood for their expansion plans, which would mean re- zoning 3 houses, making a new street, and encroaching on what was previously a nice neighborhood. When the church presents their plans, please look at it from our point of view, and try to visualize your feelings if the same situation were to come up in the neighborhood where you reside. Would you be able to approve their plans? If they get their way now, in the future they will come before you again with a future expansion plan, and ruin the whole area for those of us who are still there. We join with the Woodhill -Edina Association in opposing any change the church wishes to make. Sincedrely /HENRY T. WARNER SALLY S. WARNER REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: Craig Larsen City Planner Date: May 7, 1998 Subject: Final Plat Approval. The Coventry at Centennial Lakes 9`h Addition. Laukka, Jarvis Recommendation: Approve final plat. Info /Background: Agenda Item: III. B. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ❑ Motion ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion The proposed plat would approve building 10, a 13 unit building. Approval would mean that 87 units of this 98 unit development have been approved for construction. The proposed plat is consistent with the approved overall development plan. THE COVENTRY A CENTENNIAL LAKES TOWNHOME�� EXHIBIT EDINA, MINNESOTA APRIL 22, 1998 8ASCg1FC.DYt I B R INC M—N, Syunlc T00 Tb- 51...1 So Yieoenplu. MN 5"10. Ph_ 612/070.0700. F., 612 /OT 1.T/0 THE COVENTRY AT CENTE,iNIAL LAKES 9TH ADDITION .... ........ .. ....... .. T ... ........... . .. ....... .. .- 652.96 ....... R.103 os 0 Is 30 so I My Mn eAYD OM AX l ED D-- o Ewms waw YcM ., R.DOCAO.-1 S00'02*15•W ...•. . ..... ---------------- 375.63 , 0, ........ SOO-0215-• R.,0.6 6C9 OUTLOT 2112 - -o-3j, om S00'14'09•E nw 282.04 %2 3 on 5 6 7 0 rn 9 1 o 3 2. 13 i/i 0 OUTLOT B JJO 54 .... ........ .. ....... .. T ... ........... . .. ....... .. .- 652.96 ....... R.103 os 0 Is 30 so I My Mn eAYD OM AX l ED D-- o Ewms waw YcM ., R.DOCAO.-1 SlIFF'r P OF' 2 SIIFFTS on I 0, SlIFF'r P OF' 2 SIIFFTS LOCATION MAP Content Item: III.C. LOT DIVISION NUMBER LOCATION LD -98 -3 4908 /4910 Malibu Drive EDINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT DRAFT MINUTES, P.C. MEETING APRIL 29, 1998 LD -98 -3 JMS Equities 4908/4910 Malibu Drive Mr. Larsen informed the Commission the subject property is a developed R -2, double dwelling lot. Separate utility connections are provided. The proponents are requesting a party wall division to facilitate separate ownership of each unit. Mr. Larsen concluded staff recommends approval. Commissioner Ingwalson commented that it appears the City is asked to approve many of these. Mr. Larsen agreed. In this instance the structure is almost complete,. and the party wall division will allow each side to be sold separately, or one. person can still purchase it, and rent the other side for additional .income purposes. Commissioner McClelland noted the location and lot configuration is difficult. Mr. Larsen agreed. Commissioner McClelland pointed out this is a.good location for transition into the single family neighborhood of the new Parkwood Knolls area. Commissioner Lonsbury moved to recommend Lot Division approval. Commissioner Bergman seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT APRIL 29, 1998 LD -98 -3 JMS Equities 4908/4910 Malibu Drive The subject property is a developed R -2, double dwelling lot. Separate utility connections are provided. The proponents are requesting a party wall division to facilitate separate ownership of each unit. Recommendation Staff recommends approval. 6� z z I J I i i I I I i Established in 1962 LOT SURVEYS COMPANY, INC. LAND SURVEYORS REGISTERED UNDER THE LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA 7601 73rd Avenue North 012 -660 -3093 Fax No. 660 -3622 JMS COMPANIES Ylnneapolls, Minnesota 66428 bururUurz (drrtifirair 47 . I L. 4. \ I .I i lei \s A lASCME�f I 4R,.�- cF \ N r to Proposed Lot Division INVOICE NO. 48325 F.B.NO SCALE: 1 " = 30' 0 Denotes Iron Monument O Denotes Wood Hub Set for excavation only x000.0 Denotee Exislinq Elevation aQ0.a Denotes Proposed Elevation I —�— Denotes Surface Drainage Existing Legal Description Lot 1, Block 1, LANDMARK ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota. 0 tip \�i A0 ' 26 O � ko PARCEL —201. ICL - Proposed Legal Descriptions Parcel A. 16,755 Sq. Ft That part of Lot 1, Block 1, LANDMARK ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota, according to the recorded plat thereof lying northerly of a line which bean North 53 degrees 38 minutes 06 seconds East, assumed bearing, from a point on the west line of said lot distant 28.05 feet north of the southwest comer of said lot. For purposes of this description the west lot line bean South 2 degrees 25 minutes 13 seconds East. Parcel B: 14,646 Sq. Ft.' That part of Lot 1, Block 1, LANDMARK ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota, according to the recorded plat thereof lying southerly of a line which bean North 53 degree- 38 minutes 06 seconds East, assumed bearing, from a point on the west line of said lot distant 28.05 feet north of the southwest comer of said lot. For purposes of this description the west lot line bean South 2 degrees 25 minutes 13 seconds East. The only easements shorn are from plats of record or information provided by client. //JJ We hereby certify that this is a true and correct representation of o survey of the boundaries of the above described fond and the � TI location of all buildings and visible encroachments, if any, from or on said Ind. Signed Surveyed by us lhia 12th day .ol November 19_L7, Charles F. Ardenon. Mrn. Reg.. No.21753 7 ammo, Mo..a �i n • 0 I DIRT MUN A 0 • .T.- r 5V 7 91 *:J±\: DRAFT MINUTES, P.0 Meeting, APRIL 29, 1998 LD -98-4 William and Margaret Joan 6612 Parkwood Road 6608 Parkwood Road Mr. Larsen informed the Commission the proposed Lot Division involves a land trade between two adjacent, developed single dwelling lots. The division involves a narrow, triangular parcel created by moving the northerly point of the common lot line easterly 11 feet. The parcel contains an area of approximately 900 square feet. Both lots would continue to comply with all Zoning Ordinance requirements after the trade. Mr. Larsen concluded staff recommends approval. Commissioner Byron moved to recommend Lot Division approval. Commissioner Lonsbury seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. EDINA PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT APRIL 29, 1998 LD -98-4 William and Margaret JoaS 6612 Parkwood Road 6608 Parkwood Road The proposed Lot Division involves a land trade between two adjacent, developed single dwelling lots. The division involves a narrow, triangular parcel created by moving the northerly point of the common lot line easterly 11 feet. The parcel contains an area of approximately 900 square feet. Both lots would continue to comply with all Zoning Ordinance requirements after the trade. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval. SURVEY FOR: MARGARET JOAS PROPER— DESCR9101 FARCEL "A' ------------- -- 770 0 PROPOSED PARCEL A 2.0 �" / / / / /.. a pam tiM •ae L.1 1; /A P111PO51. I CIL 11 ICEL "B' P AR 'cle I nch 20 Ff -5 MM _w. WT 8 wi -.r L /> '96 "�9 y0• sror 1. OT 6 S •VNNI ,lu 2.96 0040 R oq 40 477.46 c W. BROWN LAND SURVEYING, INC. 2 2 2 ft. 1 11'� 21 1 -98' 36/62 4 e o REPORT /RECOMMENDATION • 5CORppgp't� • laBe To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item: Iv. A. From: Craig Larsen Consent ❑ City Planner Information Only ❑ Date: May 7, 1998 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Amendments to Section 460 Action ❑ Motion of the City Code - Signs ❑ Resolution ® Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Adopt attached Ordinance Amendments. Info /Background: The attached amendment addresses two different issues. First, the amendment establishes standards for scoreboards within public parks, school properties and golf courses. The proposed standards provide for integral sponsor panels only at Braemar Park, Van Valkenburg Park and Kuhlman Field. Please refer to the memo by John Keprios (Agenda Item VI. C.) for further information. Second, the amendment provides language addressing the permitted locations for campaign signs. This amendment is offered as a follow -up to the Council discussion on April 20, 1998. EDINA ORDINANCE NO. 1998 - 04 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 460 OF THE CITY CODE TO PROVIDE REQUIREMENTS FOR SIGNS IN PUBLICLY OWNED PARKS AND TO REGULATE THE PLACEMENT OF CAMPAIGN SIGNS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Subd. 1 of Subsection 460.05 of the City Code is amended by adding the following regulations: "fie Maximum Number Maximum Area Maximum Height Public park identification. One per frontage 24 sq. ft. ro it Scoreboards A. Field #1 at Courtney One 400 sq.ft. 20 ft. Fields (including sponsor panels) B. Van Valkenburg Park, One per field 200 sq. ft. 20 ft. Kuhlman Field and (including sponsor panels) Braemar Park except Field # 1 at Courtney Fields C. All other public parks, One per field 100 sq. ft. 20 ft. schools and golf courses Public park scoreboard 25% of scoreboard sponsor panels and other area scoreboard advertising Section 2. Subsection 460.03 of the City Code is amended by adding a new Subd. 24 as follows: "Subd. 24. Scoreboard Sponsor Panels. Sponsor panels and other forms of advertising on scoreboards are permitted only at Braemar Park, VanValkenburg Park and Kuhlman Field. Scoreboard sponsor panels and other advertising on scoreboards shall be integral to the scoreboard and shall be constructed of the same materials as the scoreboard. Section 3. Paragraph A of Subd. 3 of Subsection 460.03 of the City Code is amended to read as follows: "A. No sign shall be placed within any street right of way other than i) governmental signs which are official traffic regulatory signs or ii) campaign signs placed pursuant to Subd. 4 of this Subsection Section 4. Paragraph B of Subd. 3 of Subsection 460.03 of the City Code is amended to read as follows: `B. No freestanding sign or any portion thereof other than governmental signs shall be placed within 20 feet of the traveled portion of any public street provided that campaign signs placed pursuant to Subd. 4 of this Subsection may be placed to within 10 feet of the traveled portion of a public street. Section 5. Subd. 4 of Subsection 460.03 is amended to read as follows: "Subd. 4. Campaign Signs. Campaign signs shall comply with the following requirements: A. Campaign signs may be posted from August 1 in a state general election year until 10 days following the state general election subject to the applicable provisions of M.S. 211B.045. Such campaign signs shall conform with the provisions of Subd. 3 of Subsection 460.03. No such sign shall be placed upon the right of way without the consent of the abutting property owner. B. Campaign signs posted in connection with elections held at times other than a state general election are subject to the following: i) Maximum Size - six square feet ii) Maximum Number - one sign for each candidate per lot frontage iii) Maximum Duration - 60 days prior to the election until seven days following the election. iv) Location - Such campaign signs shall conform with the provisions of Subd. 3 of Subsection 460.03. No such sign shall be placed upon the right of way without the consent of the abutting property owner. Section 6. This ordinance is in full effect upon passage and publication. TO: FROM: VIA: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Mayor & City Council Francis Hoffman, City Engineer Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: 4 May, 1998 AGENDA ITEM V.A. : ITEM DESCRIPTION: Traffic Actuated Control System, W. 76`h St., Improvement No. TS -24 Company 1. Ridgedale Electric, Inc. 2. Egan -McKay Electrical Contractors, Inc. 3. Electric Service Co. 4. Killmer Electric Co., Inc. 5. Electrical Installation & Maintenance Co. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Ridgedale Electric Co. GENERAL INFORMATION: Amount of Quote or Bid 1. $110,400.00 2. $112,750.00 3. $113,700.00 4. $119,700.00 5. $127,140.00 $110,400.00 This purchase is for a traffic signal control system at W. 76'h Street and a private driveway. The Engineer's estimate for this project was $120,000.00 and it will be funded through special assessment to abutting property owners. L Public Works - Engineerinq Signatur Department The Recommended Bid is L ts (6A 1 within budget not within budget J)6hn Wallin, Finan a Director Kenneth Rosland, City Manager ok se22,, w TO: FROM: VIA: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Mayor & City Council Francis Hoffman, City Engineer Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15.000 DATE: 4 May, 1,998 AGENDA ITEM V.B. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Irrigation System, W. 66' St. Between France Avenue and York Avenue, Improvement No. WM -385 Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Aqua Engineering 1. $39,850.00 2. 2. 3. 3. 4. 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Reject bid. GENERAL INFORMATION: This purchase is for the irrigation work remaining on W. 66`h Street between France Avenue and York Avenue. Staff has decided to reject this bid as the Engineer's estimate for this project was $19,000.00. Public Works - Engineering Signatu e 10,1 Department The Recommended Bid is within budget X� JL not within budget J hn Wallin, Finance bireictor Kenneth Roslan , City M- nag—e-r REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Francis Hoffman, Director of Public Works VIA: Kenneth Rosland, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: 4 May, 1998 AGENDA ITEM .v.C. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Aquatic Weed Treatment Company. Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Lake Restoration, Inc. 1. $ 16,737.00 2. Midwest Aqua Care 2. $ 27,700.00 3. Lake Management, Inc. 3. $ 29,695.00 4. 4. 5. 5. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Lake Restoration, Inc. $ 16,737.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This is part of the water quality program for the City's ponds and lakes. This quote provides for aquatic weed and algae control on 34 lakes and ponds in the City. This quote provides treatment on each pond or lake area. This program is funded by the stormwater utility. Public Works - Utilities Sign: ure epartment The Recommended Bid is L J, � (rA within budget not within budget in Wallin, inanc Di ector - Kenneth Roslan , City Mana r REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # Vl. A. From: Francis J. Hoffman' �1 Consent ❑ City Engineer Information Only ❑ Date: May 4, 1998 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Signal Easement for g Action ❑ Motion Hennepin County at ® Resolution York Liquor /Cub Foods ❑ Ordinance Entrance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Authorize Mayor and Manager to sign traffic signal easement for the Edina Liquor Store /Cub Foods entrance signal. Info /Background: During construction of York Avenue between W. 66" Street and W. 690' Street, Hennepin County installed a traffic signal at the Edina Liquor /Cub Foods entrance. Via a cooperative agreement with Hennepin County, the City agreed to provide appropriate right -of -way or easements as necessary. The signal easement grants rights to Hennepin County to place and maintain traffic loop detectors on the driveway exit. Both Cub Foods and the City are granting said easement to the County. Staff recommends approval of request. o Ce to s o • ,N�RppttPlY'9/ IABN REPORT /RECOMMENDATION TO: Mayor Smith and Members of the City Council From: John Keprios, Director Park and Recreation Department Date: April 29, 1998 Subject: Wooddale Park Comfort Station. Recommendation: The Park Board recommends: Agenda Item # VI. B. Consent X Information Only Mgr. Recommends C To HRA X To Council Action X Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion "THAT PER THE NEIGHBORHOOD'S SUGGESTION WE TRY PORTABLE TOILETS THIS SUMMER AND SEE HOW IT WORKS AND WE WILL REVIEW IT AT THE END OF THE SUMMER AND STOP CONSTRUCTION OF THE PERMANENT FACILITY AT WOODDALE PARK. Background: On March 22, 1998, the Edina Park and Recreation Department received a petition signed by residents the Wooddale Park neighborhood concerning the construction of the comfort station. Staff immediately put construction on hold and mailed out 573 notices to residents of the Wooddale Park neighborhood inviting them to attend an input meeting scheduled for Wednesday, April 8, 7 p.m. at City Hall. 17 residents attended the meeting and twenty -two (22) residents submitted letters. At the meeting, there appeared to be no compromise to the issue that would satisfy all those in attendance. The neighborhood input meeting on Wednesday, April 8, 1998, was also attended by Park Board Chairman, Dave Crowther, Assistant Director, Ed MacHolda, Project Architect, Jon Brakke and Edina Police Officer, Gerry Drevlow. At the meeting, residents and others had the following concerns, comments and questions: Can children lock themselves inside the restrooms, and if so, what problems does that create? The City should simply place signs at Wooddale Park to inform park users that there are restroom facilities at Utley Park. It was noted that there are no windows in the proposed building. -2- • It was noted that the comfort station would be used only during warm weather months and would be locked up and winterized during the winter months. • The key reasons for proposing permanent restrooms for Wooddale Park are because of scheduled youth baseball and softball games during eight weeks of the year but especially due to the heavy use of the playground equipment and picnic shelter during warm weather months. • Although Wooddale Park is a small neighborhood park, the main reason for not proposing comfort stations at other small neighborhood parks is that they do not have scheduled ball games at those parks plus they do not have a picnic shelter and do not get the same amount of park users. • One resident's view was to recommend eliminating Utley Park restrooms and add permanent restrooms at Wooddale Park. The point being that it is safer for adults to cross 50th Street than it is for youth. In addition, small children rarely give sufficient lead time when nature calls and therefore need restroom facilities in closer proximity. • Edina Police Department does not support encouraging small children to cross 50th Street. • There is a concern of crime in a facility where the doors can be locked from the inside. • A resident expressed concern of availability of financial and physical resources to properly maintain the facility. • Several residents approved of the restrooms if they were to be relocated to the open space area of the park. • Some residents feel that the facility should remain right where it is proposed. • Some residents feel strongly that there should not be any type of permanent restroom facility in the park.. • The Edina Police Department responded to questions that the safest location for the comfort station (regarding surveillance of the facility) would be in a location closer to 50th Street easily visible from a squad car. Staff explained to the audience at the beginning of the meeting, the main reasons for staffs proposed construction of a comfort station at Wooddale Park are: 1. Numerous requests from park users for the past several years that restrooms need to be made available wherever there are scheduled baseball and softball games for youth. 2. Numerous requests for restrooms from park users who frequent the playground equipment and picnic shelter because they are forced to use the trees as restrooms. 3. Resident neighbors clearly do not approve of portable toilets due to aesthetics, smell, vandalism and sanitary reasons due to lack of running water. In choosing the most logical location for the comfort station, staff and the consulting architect identified a location that met the following criteria: 1. Convenient access for the majority of the park users, who are identified as users of the playground equipment, picnic shelter and bal field. 2. Close proximity to the existing walking path. 3. Does not require removal of any existing trees and/or shrubs. 4. Does not reduce the amount of any valuable open play space. At their April 14, 1998, meeting, the Park Board listened to residents' testimony and discussed the issue as reflected in the Park Board minutes. The Park Board then unanimously passed a recommendation that the comfort station construction be put on hold this summer, that portable toilets be used at Wooddale Park and that the issue be addressed again at the end of the summer. 0 i o e 4 cri �° • fNroRPOttI'1�� REPORT /RECOMMENDATION TO: Mayor Smith and Members of the City Council From: John Keprios, Director Park and Recreation Department Date: April 29, 1998 Subject: Baseball Scoreboards With Advertising - Courtney Ballfields, Braemar Park. Recommendation: Approve the Park Board's recommendation to: Agenda Item # vi . c . Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA X To Council Action ❑. Motion ❑ Resolution X Ordinance ❑ Discussion "ACCEPT THE PROPOSAL OF THE BASEBALL ASSOCIATION TO USE SPONSOR PANEL ADVERTISING AS A MEANS OF FUNDING TO REPLACE THE FOUR SCOREBOARDS AT COURTNEY BALLFIELDS IN BRAEMAR PARK, WHICH INCLUDES THE LARGE SCOREBOARD ON FIELD NUMBER ONE." Background: At the April 14, 1998, Park Board meeting, the Edina Baseball Association made a proposal to raise funds through the sale of sponsor panels to replace four scoreboards at the Courtney Ballfields in Braemar Park. Although current City Code does not allow for any outdoor commercial advertising (billboards) in Edina on public or private land, there is an Ordinance Amendment on the City Council Agenda to address that issue. One of staffs concerns brought to the Park Board's attention regarding this proposal was the size of the scoreboard proposed for field #1 (9'4" X 36). The current scoreboard on field #1 is 5'X 16'. However, as reflected in the Park Board minutes, after much discussion, the vote was unanimous to approve the large scoreboard and the advertising concept for all four scoreboards. This Park Board recommendation is consistent with the City Council's two -year trial basis fund= raising through advertising policy. In accordance with the current policy, each advertising proposal requires prior approval of the City Council. page 1 of 2 The cost to replace the scoreboards are as follows: FIELD # COST 1 $16,000 2 $6,000 3 $6,000 4 $6,000 The dimensions of the scoreboards and advertising panels at Courtney Fields are as follows: Scoreboard Dimensions Field# (including sponsor panels) Available Advertising_ Dimensions #1 11'4 "X36' 2'X36' #2,#3 & #4 8'X 16' 2'X 16' The sponsor panels are professionally created by the scoreboard company. The proposed sponsor panels would be placed on the top of each scoreboard no larger than permitted by City Code. Examples of similar sponsor panels and scoreboard for field #1 are attached to this report. The field #1 scoreboard would have three sponsor panels side -by -side (approximately 2' X 12' each) located on the top of the scoreboard, whereas, the other three scoreboards would have only one sponsor panel per scoreboard. The proposed scoreboards and sponsor panels are in compliance with the proposed Sign Ordinance Amendment. The sponsor panels on field #1 would be less than 18% of the total scoreboard sign dimension. The sponsor panels on fields 2, 3 and 4 would be 25% of the total scoreboard sign dimension. The existing scoreboards at Courtney Ballfields are about 20 years old and in need of replacement. It would not be cost effective to repair the existing scoreboards. The initial advertising contract would be for a five year period. At the end of the five year period, the advertising contract would be negotiated and again require approval of the City Council. page 2 of 2 Chaska Community Fields Armstrong High School Field 1 1, 0 e \�roRPoii? v lose REPORURECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item # VI.D. From: GORDON L. HUGHES Consent Information Only F1 Date: MAY 4,1998 Mgr. Recommends F—] To HRA Subject: ® To Council TERMINATION OF TRAFFIC AGREEMENT - CENTENNIAL Action ® Motion LAKES Resolution Ordinance 7 Discussion Recommendation: Approve termination of Traffic Agreement for Centennial Lakes in Edina and Minnesota Center in Bloomington. Report: At the April 20, 1998, meeting, the City Council approved an amended and restated agreement with respect to traffic and transportation for Centennial Lakes and Minnesota Center. This agreement was based on preliminary negotiations held between Edina staff and Bloomington staff. Following the April 20, 1998, approval, Bloomington staff advised us that they had reconsidered their position and now wished to terminate the prior agreements rather than amend and restate them (it should be noted that such a termination was originally advocated by Edina staff but we had agreed to the amendment and restatement based upon Bloomington's concerns). REPORT /RECOMMENDATION - Termination of Traffic Agreement - Centennial Lakes May 4, 1998 Page two For the reasons mentioned on April 20, 1998, staff believes the termination of the Bloomington agreement and the Edina agreement are warranted. We believe that the significant reduction in the density of each of the respective developments renders the original agreements unnecessary. Although the amendment and restatement recommended at the last meeting served our present needs, we can se no reason why the agreement should not be terminated. .-s c�i .70 CAI Lv. JL r� 1Q1AJ4VA044 LUKJGI 1Q111At1 10 x��- _wMCGJkN[•] *e :��i • a THIS AGREEMENT made this _ day of . 1998 by and among the City of Bloomington ( "Bloomington "), a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; the City of Edina ( "Edina "), a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota and South Edina Development Corporation ( "SED "), a Minnesota corporation. A. Bloomington, Edina and SED hereto entered into an Agreement dated April 25, 1988 ( "Traffic Agreement ") related to a mixed use development project being developed by SED ( "SED Project ") on a site located generally in the northeast quadrant of the I- 494/France interchange in the corporate limits of Edina immediately adjacent to the corporate limits of Bloomington. B. As required by the Minnesota Environmental Policy Act (MEPA), Minn. Stat. Chapter I I6D, Edina prepared an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW), a draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and final EIS for the SED Project. C. Bloomington participated in all stages of the EAW/EIS process expressing its concern with the sufficiency of the draft EIS and specifically recommended an agreement similar in form to the Agreement as a mitigation measure. D. In the public interest and in the interest of Edina and Bloomington the Traffic Agreement was entered into to resolve the concerns addressed by Bloomington without protracted litigation- E. The parties to the Traffic Agreement desire to terminate the Traffic Agreement and for this purpose this Agreement is entered into. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above facts and the mutual covenants contained herein, it is hereby agreed as follows: 1. Bloomington, Edina and SED hereby acknowledge and agree that the Traffic Agreement is hereby terminated and shall be of no further force and effect. 2. This Agreement has been formally approved by, respectively, the City Council for the City of Bloomington, the City Council for the City of Edina and the Board of Directors of SED. 3. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each one of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all such counterparts together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 4 004 vii L:i JV l "Al lU.JJ r:f.1 LV1LJyVLU�-! LVICJLI �1i1111�C1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Bloomington, Edina and SED have executed this Agreement as of the date and year first above written. CITY OF BLOOMINGTON SOUTH EDINA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION By Mayor By City Manager Approved as to Form: By David R. Ornstein City Attorney 2215 West Old Shakopee Road Bloomington; MN 55431 -2- By Its By Its Wj oos CITY OF EDINA By Glenn Smith, Mayor By Kenneth E. Rosland, City Manager Approved as to Form: By Jerome P. Gilligan City Attorney 220 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) } ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing was acknowledged before me this day of , 1998 by I and , the Mayor and City Manager, respectively, of the City of Bloomington, a municipal corporation under the laws of Minnesota, on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public r3r C. Uub vi, rig .rJ ♦ a1L lV VV i.Ll lU1LVYULUYY ✓VI�.iC.1 IlIIjl� \r.j CITY OF EDINA By Glenn Smith, Mayor By Kenneth E. Rosland, City Manager Approved as to Form: By Jerome P. Gilligan City Attorney 220 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) } ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing was acknowledged before me this day of , 1998 by I and , the Mayor and City Manager, respectively, of the City of Bloomington, a municipal corporation under the laws of Minnesota, on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public r3r C. Uub v ai A.Yi ZOO rA1 LW; 04 r:ia 101404UA044 LV1CJL1 nn11oC1 007 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing was acknowledged before me this day of ' 1998 by Glenn Smith and Kenneth E. Rosland, the Mayor and City Manager, respectively, of the City of Edina, a municipal corporation under the laws of Minnesota, on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing was acknowledged before me this day of .1998 by and .the and , respectively, of South Edina Development Corporation, a Minnesota corporation, on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public -4- .N. ..... L.1" VUAJGl lfnl1..L1 C. UUO ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT OF CITY OF EDINA THIS INSTRUMENT is being delivered this _ day of , 1998 by the City of Edina ( "Edina "), a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota, with respect to an Agreement dated November 15, 1985, by and among the City of Bloomington ( "Bloomington "), a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; Edina; The Metropolitan Council ( "Metropolitan Council "), a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and Homart Development Co. ( "Homart" ), a Delaware corporation.. BACKGROUND A. The Agreement related to an office, retail and hotel development project proposed to be developed by Homart ( "Homart Project ") on a site located generally in the northwest quadrant of the I- 494 /France interchange in the corporate limits of Bloomington immediately adjacent to the corporate limits of Edina legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto ( "Homart Project Site "). B. As required by the Minnesota Environmental Policy Act (ME-PA), Minn. Stat. Chapter I I6D, Bloomington prepared an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW), a draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) and final EIS for the Homart Project. C. Edina actively participated at all stages of the EAW/EIS process, expressing its concern that the Homart Project, as proposed, would have significant adverse impact on Edina and that the EIS did not adequately address those impacts. D. Comments and recommendations concerning the Homart Project EIS were submitted to Bloomington. by, among others, the Metropolitan Council, the Hennepin County Highway Department, and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, as well as Edina. E. On September 25, 1985, Edina filed suit in the Hennepin County District Court challenging the adequacy of the Project EIS under MEPA, Minn. Stat. Chapter 1 l 6D, and alleging claims under the Minnesota Environmental Rights Act (MERA), Minn. Stat. Chapter 116B, the Metropolitan Land Use Planning Act, Minn. Stat. § §473.851 et "e. And common law. City of Edina v. City of Bloomington and Homart Dev_dgpment Co., Hennepin County District Court, Civil File No. 85- 17509. F. On September 25, 1985, Edina filed a request with the Metropolitan Council to initiate metropolitan significance review of the Prqiect pursuant to Minn. Stat. §473.173 and Minn. Rules Chapter 5700. On October 3, 1985, the Chair of the Metropolitan Council issued an Order commencing metropolitan significance review of the Project. G. In the public interest and in the interest of Edina, Bloomington, Metropolitan Council and Homart, and in the interest of judicial economy, the Agreement was entered into to JU :Al LV ;04 rAA 101444UA044 uUAOLI nrillll%tl l¢J 009 reach a materially satisfactory settlement and the Hennepin County District Court action and the metropolitan significance review without protracted litigation. H. Edina has agreed to terminate its rights under the Agreement and for this purpose this instrument is being executed and delivered by Edina. NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged by Edina., Edina hereby agrees as follows: 1. Edina acknowledges and agrees that all of its rights contained in the Agreement are hereby terminated and shall be of no further effect. Edina further agrees to cooperate with Bloomington to obtain the approval of Metropolitan Council to the termination of the Agreement and to execute such other documents and instruments as may be reasonably required to evidence the termination of the Agreement. 2. The execution and delivery of this instrument has been formally approved by the City Council for the City of Edina. 3. This instrument may be relied upon by all parties to the Agreement and their successors and assigns. rN WITNESS WHEREOF, Edina has executed this instrument as of the date and year first above written. CITY OF EDINA By Glenn Smith, Mayor By Kenneth E. Rosland, City Manager Approved as to Form: LIM -2- Jerome P. Gilligan City Attorney 220 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 vii'6aeao [A1 lu:04 CaA 1014J4UL044 LUKJt.i 1YH111VhY. Lim 010 STATE OF MINNESOTA ss. COUNTY OF The foregoing was acknowledged before me this day of , 1998 by Glenn Smith and Kenneth E. Rosland, the Mayor and City Manager, respectively, of the City of Edina, a municipal corporation under the laws of Minnesota, on behalf of the corporation. si Notary Public . z. . .. � .... -- • a'L i V 1 r V f Vm. V 4 2 L V AJF 1 n d l l .la LF--j U 11 // 1_ 4_ LEGAL DESCRIPTION HOMART PROJECT SITE ow e • ,�CORPor"V � lees REPORURECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: CEIL SMITH ASSISTANT TO CITY MANAGER Date: MAY 4, 1998 Subject: TEAMSTERS LOCAL #320 (PATROL OFFICERS) LABOR AGREEMENT Recommendation: Approve Contract. Agenda Item # VI.E. Consent Information Only Mgr. Recommends Action a To HRA ® To Council ® Motion Resolution Ordinance Discussion Report: The following are the proposed changes: 1. Duration - 2 year agreement effective January 1, 1998, through December 31, 1999. 2. Increase Employee Fitness Incentive to $600.00 per year 3. Employer will maintain cost of P.O.S.T. Board License fees of $30.00 per year. 4. Insurance - Increase City contribution of $20.00 per month in 1998 and $10.00 a month in 1999. 5. Wages: 1998 - 3% increase above 1997 1999 - 3% increase above 1998 For 1998, these proposed changes represent a 3.80% increase in the total contract. REPORT /RECOMMENDATION - Teamsters Local #320 (Patrol Officers) Labor Agreement May 4, 1998 Page two For 1999, the proposed changes are a 2.8% increase in the total contract. Eligibility for the employees fitness incentive shall be based upon the City of Edina's Police Fitness Program dated January 1, 1994. Employees eligible for the fitness incentive shall receive not more than $600.00 per year to be applied to the cost of dues or fees for membership or use of a qualifying fitness facility or program. In no event shall the amount of the incentive paid exceed the actual cost of the dues, fees or program costs. Eligible employees shall receive the fitness incentive. In not more than two payments to be issued within three weeks after submission to the employer of evidence required by the Fitness Incentive Program. There are approximately 15 employees in this program at this time. eii - 0 , ytcci��nn`) REPORURECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item #V1. F. From: Francis J. Hoffman /a�,� Consent Director of Public Works Information Only Date: May 4, 1998 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Edina Public Works Action E] Motion Open House, Saturday, ❑Resolution May 16`h from 9 AM to 1 PM ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: None. Info /Background: As part of the National Public Works Week in May, the Edina Public Works is holding an open house on Saturday, May 16'h from 9 AM to 1 PM. This is the second annual open house. Staff will be handing out several brochures on topics such as safety in the streets and water conservation and will also be displaying equipment. All Edina residents are cordially invited to attend. COUN'IL C REGISTER TELEPHONE 01 -1998 (11:12) ADMINISTRATION TELEPHONE 1 . TELEPHONE 041098 SUPERV. & OVRH TELEPHONE 041098 FIRE DEPT. GEN page CHECK NO ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 188390 05/04/98 $85.00 A -1 ROOTMASTER Contracted sewer clea 1870620 BUILDING MAINT CONTR REPAIRS 3388 < *> TELEPHONE $85.00* DISTRIBUTION TELEPHONE 041098 PATROL TELEPHONE 188391 05/04/98 $82.42 A -ABC Appliance Jon canceled 98000406 GENERAL FD PRO MECHAN PERMITS < *> 1(1nGn $82.42* PROF SERVICES 1731 594808 INSPECTIONS PRINTING 700948 188392 05/04/98 $45.00 A -V Group Repair council camera MN272040 CONTINGENCIES PROF SERVICES < *> $45.00* 188393 05/04/98 $180.00 ABDELLA, PAUL AC service 041798 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $180.00* 188394 05/04/98 $146.25 ADAMS, MIKE MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 042598 FIRE DEPT. GEN MILEAGE < *> $146.25* 188395 05/04/98 188396 05/04/98 188397 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 188398 05/04/98 05/04/98 188400 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 188401 05/04/98 05/04/98 188402 05/04/98 05/04/98 $27.27 $27.27* $80.61 $80.61* $1,277.79 $234.30 $475.00 $1,987.09* $167.74 $584.25 $751.99* $10.12 $84.49 $171.92 $97.48 $288.58 $24.72 $94.29 $18.53 $117.74 $27.33 $7.58 $134.52 $472.47 $25.65 $35.76 $1,611.18* $2,165.00 $11,693.84 $13,858.84* $9.33 $26.84 $36.17* ADAMS, RITA K. TELEPHONE 042598 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE Adams COST OF GOODS - PRO S ARINV100 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 1724 ADVANCED GRAPHICS SYSTEM GENERAL SUPPLIES 015219 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI ADVANCED GRAPHICS SYSTEM GENERAL SUPPLIES 015221 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI ADVANCED GRAPHICS SYSTEM SERVICE CONTRACTS EQU 015503 CENT SVC GENER SVC CONTR EQUI ADVANCED STATE SECURITY Video tapes 17911 YORK SELLING GENERAL SUPPLI 2977 ADVANCED STATE SECURITY EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 17975 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP REPLACEM 2911 AIRTOUCH CELLULAR AIRTOUCH CELLULAR AIRTOUCH CELLULAR AIRTOUCH CELLULAR AIRTOUCH CELLULAR AIRTOUCH CELLULAR AIRTOUCH CELLULAR AIRTOUCH CELLULAR AIRTOUCH CELIULAR AIRTOUCH CELLULAR AIRTOUCH CELLULAR AIRTOUCH CELLULAR AIRTOUCH CELLULAR AIRTOUCH CELLULAR AIRTOUCH CELLULAR ALBERG WATER SERVICES ALRRRG WATER SERV:rcrs ALBINSON ALBINSON Cellular TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE GENERAL SUPPLIES Well motor repair W01 r-p sir PRINTING PRINTING 040198 INVESTIGATION TELEPHONE 041098 ADMINISTRATION TELEPHONE 041098 ENGINEERING GE TELEPHONE 041098 SUPERV. & OVRH TELEPHONE 041098 FIRE DEPT. GEN TELEPHONE 041098 PUBLIC HEALTH TELEPHONE 041098 INSPECTIONS TELEPHONE 041098 PARK ADMIN. TELEPHONE 041098 PARK MAINTENAN TELEPHONE 041098 TREES & MAINTE TELEPHONE 041098 CLUB HOUSE TELEPHONE 041098 DISTRIBUTION TELEPHONE 041098 PATROL TELEPHONE 041098 INVESTIGATION TELEPHONE 041098 ANIMAL CONTROL GENERAL SUPPLI 10867 MAINT OF COi1RS PROF SERVICES 2574 1(1nGn MATNT OF COURS PROF SERVICES 1731 594808 INSPECTIONS PRINTING 700948 INSPECTIONS PRINTING COUNCIL CHEC... REGISTER 01 -1 ---t -1998 (11:12) page 2 CHECK NO DATE ------------------------------------------------------------------- CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 188403 < *> 05/04/98 $677.00 $677.00* ALSTAD, MARIAN --------------------------- AC service 041798 -------- ART CENTER ADM - ------------ PROF SERVICES ------------- 188404 < *> 05/04/98 $299.36 $299.36* American Freightways Freight 04583408 PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPLI 3652 188405 05/04/98 05/04/98 $25.83 $1,353.63 ANCHOR PAPER ANCHOR PAPER Paper for business li 51950110 PUBLIC HEALTH GENERAL SUPPLI * > $1,379.46* Pa p er 10835910 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI 3396 .188406 05/04/98 $2,940.00 ANOKA- HENNEPIN TECHNICAL First aid course 27109 TRAINING CONF < > $2,940.00* & SCHOOLS 3479 188407 < *> 05/04/98 $3,450.00 $3,450.00* AON RISK SERVICES INC OF INSURANCE ?.08993 CENT SVC GENER INS1RANCE 188408 < *> 05/04/98 $23.00 $23.00* APCO DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 042798 POLICE DEPT. G DUES & SUBSCRI 188409 < > 05/04/98 $230.06 $230.06* APRIA HEALTH CARE Chair lift parts 139951 POOL TRACK GRE REPAIR PARTS 2307 188410 < *> 05/04/98 $90.00 $90.00* APWA DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 042798 ENGINEERING GE DUES & SUBSCRI 188411 < *> 05/04/98 $111.45 $111.45* AQUA ENGINEERING GENERAL SUPPLIES 030876 SNOW & ICE REM GENERAL SUPPLI 3566 188412 < *> 05/04/98 $42.00 ARMCOM DISTRIBUTING COMP AC electrical 462500 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI 3460 $42.00* 188413 < *> 05/04/98 $45.00 $45.00* ARTISTS OF MINNESOTA ADVERTISING OTHER 041.898 ART CENTER ADM ADVERT OTHER 188414 < *> 05/04/98 $533.51 $533.51* ASHWORTH INC COST OF GOODS - PRO S 354189 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 9485 188415 < *> 05/04/98 $14.91 $14.91* ASPLUND COFFEE Water softener 04069900 CITY HALL GENE GENERAL SUPPLI 188416 < *> 05/04/98 $654.42 $654.42* AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES Cellular 041698 INVESTIGATION TELEPHONE 188417 < *> 05/04/98 $0.82 $0.82* AT & T TELEPHONE 042198 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE 188418 < *> 05/04/98 $18.46 $18.46* AT &T TELEPHONE 041298 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE 1HH41.9 05/04/98 05/04/98 $81.92 $21.10 BARBARA BUIE /PE'P'PY CASH MEETING EXPENSE 042498 ED ADMINISTRAT MEETING EXPENS 05/04/98 $20.47 BARBARA BUIE /PETTY CASH BARBARA BUIE /PE'T'TY CASH GENERAL SUPPLIES 042498 ED ADMINISTRAT GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $123.49* GENERAL SUPPLIES 042498 ED BUILDING & GENERAL SUPPLI 188420 05/04/98 $601.16 BARR ENGINEERING COMPANY Prof eng sery 23273545 GENERAL STORM PROF SERVICES COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER $102.05 BENN, BRADLEY 01- MAY -1998 (11:12) 041698 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER page 3 CHECK NO ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATE CHECK AMOUNT BENN, BRADLEY VENDOR DESCRIPTION SUPPLIES INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM <*> < *> $601.16* $137.39* 188421 05/04/98 $166.72 Battery Wholesale Inc Batteries KATHRYN AC service 3012 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 3380 < *> < *> $166.72* $90.00* 188422 05/04/98 $50.00 BCA /Training & Developme CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS T005524 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS YORK SELLING < *> SUBSCRI $50.00* 05/04/98 $15.95 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 5496420 188423 05/04/98 $708.00 BEACON BALLFIELDS Field dry $20.06 BERTELSON 323012 FIELD MAINTENA LINE MARK POWD 1680 5496440 05/04/98 $780.00 BEACON BALLFIELDS Field dry 05/04/98 $21.43 323013 FIELD MAINTENA LINE MARK POWD 1664 < *> 5500660 $1,488.00* GENERAL SUPPLI 3302 05/04/98 $136.02 BERTELSON BROS. INC. 188424 05/04/98 $835.00 Bearby, Mark COST OF GOODS - PRO S 031898 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 1759 < *> INC. $835.00* SUPPLIES S001405 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI 3067 05/04/98 $26.14 188425 05/04/98 $718.88 Becker Arena Products GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC GENER 9288 ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPLI 3543 < *> $14.69 $718.88* BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 5517250 LIQUOR 50TH ST GENERAL SUPPLI 3603 188426 05/04/98 $16.00 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 13960800 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE SUPPLI 05/04/98 $63.00 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 13995500 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE GENERAL SUPPLI 05/04/98 $159.10 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 27501400 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX CENT SVC GENER GENERAL 05/04/98 $359.75 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 27501500 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 5520160 CENT SVC GENER 05/04/98 $26.00 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 27501600 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX SUPPLIES 5521850 05/04/98 $100.00 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 14045400 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE GENERAL SUPPLIES 05/04/98 $57.50 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 14048800 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 05/04/98 $60.35 BELLBOY CORPORATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 27541800 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX GENERAL < *> 5528170 $841.70* GENERAL SUPPLI 3552 05/04/98 $23.17 BERTELSON BROS. INC. 188427 05/04/98 $120.00 Belsito, Stephen AC service 042498 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES $120.00* 188428 05/04/98 $102.05 BENN, BRADLEY Art work sold 041698 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER 05/04/98 $35.34 BENN, BRADLEY GENERAL SUPPLIES 041798 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $137.39* 188429 05/04/98 $90.00 BENNETT, KATHRYN AC service 042498 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $90.00* 188431 05/04/98 $118.22 BERTELSON BROS. INC. File cabinet 5497030 YORK SELLING DUES & SUBSCRI 05/04/98 $15.95 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 5496420 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI 05/04/98 $20.06 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 5496440 POOL OPERATION GENERAL SUPPLI 05/04/98 $21.43 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 5500660 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 3302 05/04/98 $136.02 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 5506840 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 3327 05/04/98 $22.35 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES S001405 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI 3067 05/04/98 $26.14 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 5517250 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI 05/04/98 $14.69 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 5517250 LIQUOR 50TH ST GENERAL SUPPLI 3603 05/04/98 $44.88 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 5517250 LIQUOR YORK GE GENERAL SUPPLI 05/04/98 $111.70 BERTELSON BROS. INC. Marking gun price 5517390 YORK SELLING GENERAL SUPPLI 05/04/98 $25.22 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 5518920 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI 3603 05/04/98 $10.12 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 5520160 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI 3603 05/04/98 $84.03 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 5521850 YORK SELLING GENERAL SUPPLI 05/04/98 $22.15 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 5524240 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 3475 05/04/98 $74.99 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 5526750 FIRE DEPT. GEN OFFICE SUPPLIE 3059 05/04/98 $8.24 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 5528170 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 3552 05/04/98 $23.17 BERTELSON BROS. INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 5528320 FIRE DEPT. GEN OFFICE SUPPLIE 3059 COUNCIL CHEC. xEGISTER 01----1998 (11:12) page 4 CHECK NO ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 188431 05/04/98 $143.65 BERTELSON BROS. INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES R180270 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI 3427 < *> $923.01* 188432 05/04/98 $45.85 Beet Access Systems of M Repair parts 062444 POOL OPERATION REPAIR PARTS 3103 05/04/98 $371.69 Best Access Systems of M Door locks 62872 BUILDINGS REPAIR PARTS 3328 < *> $417.54* 188433 05/04/98 $87.67 BEST BUY COMPANY INC. REPAIR PARTS 00501142 MEDIA LAB REPAIR PARTS 2725 < *> $87.67* 188434 05/04/98 $36.30 BLEDSOE, SARA Art work sold 041698 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $36.30* 188435 05/04/98 $75.00 BLOOMINGTON MEDALIST BAN Services Edinborough 051098 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $75.00* 188436 05/04/98 $379.00 Blue Cross & Blue Sheild Reimbursment 952827 GENERAL FD PRO AMBULANCE FEES < *> $379.00* 188437 05/04/98 $150.00 Boeckman, Susan AC service 042498 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES 05/04/98 $52.44 Boeckman, Susan CRAFT SUPPLIES 042498 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES < *> $202.44* 188438 05/04/98 $893.00 BONESTROO ROSENE ANDERLI Arena arch fee 53358 PKBOND CIP EQUIP REPLACEM < *> $893.00* 188439 05/04/98 $115.41 BOYER TRUCKS Shop 704671 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3178 05/04/98 $5.21 BOYER TRUCKS Shop 704788 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3179 05/04/98 $5.12 BOYER TRUCKS Shop 705249 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3182 05/04/98 05/04/98 $11.86 BOYER TRUCKS Shop 706423 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 3190 05/04/98 $75.53 $210.33 BOYER TRUCKS BOYER TRUCKS Shop 708793 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3507 Shop 709499 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3516 < *> $423.46* 188440 05/04/98 $125.00 BRAEMAR CLUBHOUSE Seminar 041698 HUMAN RELATION EDUCATION PRGM <*> $125.00* 188441 05/04/98 $28..90 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 050498 GOLF ADMINISTR CONF & SCHOOLS 05/04/98 $32.00 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE POSTAGE 050498 GOLF ADMINISTR POSTAGE 05/04/98 $105.16 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE GENERAL SUPPLIES 050498 GOLF ADMINISTR GENERAL SUPPLI 05/04/98 $69.13 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE OFFICE SUPPLIES 050498 GOLF ADMINISTR OFFICE SUPPLIE 05/04/98 $4.72 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE COST OF GOODS SOLD 050498 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 05/04/98 $70.62 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE COST OF GOODS - PRO S 050498 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR < *> $310.53* 188442 OS /04/98 $28.60 BROCKWAY, MAUREEN Art work nnld 0111698 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER <,> $28.60* 188443 05/04/98 $67.00 BUDGET PROJECTOR REPAIR REPAIR PARTS 7054 MEDIA LAB REPAIR PARTS 2295 < *> $67.00* 188444 05/04/98 $40.00 Budish, Paula Refund coach pitch 042798 GENERAL FD PRO REGISTRATION F < *> $40.00* 188445 05/04/98 $28.60 BUELL, KIM Art work sold 041698 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 01- MAY -1998 (11:12) page 5 CHECK NO ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM <*> $28.60* 188446 05/04/98 $145.34 BUIE, BARBARA MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 042498 ED ADMINISTRAT MILEAGE < *> $145.34* 188447 05/04/98 $85.00 Burtis, Bob Services Edinborough 052198 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $85.00* 188448 05/04/98 $120.00 C & E Auto Upholstery Body panels for cushm 041398 CENTENNIAL LAK REPAIR PARTS < *> $120.00* 188449 05/04/98 $1,137.00 C.H. BROWN CO Managemant fee 042198 GENERAL FD PRO DUE FROM HRA < *> $1,137.00* 188450 05/04/98 $2,149.75 C.O. CARLSON AIR CONDITI Progress billing 10030 MEDIA LAB CONS CIP 9814 05/04/98 $805.26 C.O. CARLSON AIR CONDITI Repairs 10031 MEDIA LAB CONS CIP 3700 < *> $2,955.01* 188451 05/04/98 $4,442.02 CALLAWAY GOLF COST OF GOODS - PRO S 90757600 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 8831 < *> $4,442.02* 188452 05/04/98 $2,062.08 Camas Ready mix 1042367 STREET RENOVAT CONCRETE 5582 05/04/98 $628.38 Camas Ready mix 1042368 STREET RENOVAT CONCRETE 5582 05/04/98 $75.24 Camas GENERAL SUPPLIES 314024 GENERAL STORM GENERAL SUPPLI 3655 05/04/98 $4,064.70 Camas Ready mix 1042821 STREET RENOVAT GENERAL SUPPLI 2854 < *> $6,830.40* 188453 05/04/98 $84.25 CAMPION CATERING Bd of review 32744 CITY COUNCIL MEETING EXPENS 3635 < *> $84.25* 188454 05/04/98 $50.00 CANTON, JANET MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 042498 FINANCE MILEAGE < *> $50.00* 188455 05/04/98 $116.30 CARLSON TRACTOR /EQUIPMEN Mower parts 1002269 MOWING REPAIR PARTS 2660 05/04/98 $66.79 CARLSON TRACTOR /EQUIPMEN Mower parts 1002570 MOWING REPAIR PARTS 2707 < *> $183.09* 188456 05/04/98 $157.82 CATCO REPAIR PARTS 366699 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3176 05/04/98 $45.44 CATCO ACCESSORIES 366755 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 3180 05/04/98 $421.97 CATCO Motor repair 366987 CENTENNIAL LAK REPAIR PARTS 3270 < *> $625.23* 188457 05/04/98 $389.50 CERES ENVIRONMENTAL SERV Tree wase disposal 21421 TREES & MAINTE RUBBISH REMOVA 2907 < *> $389.50* 188458 05/04/98 $473.02 CHARLES SAKMANN GOLF INC COST OF GOODS - PRO S 048703. PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 1753 < *> $473.02* 188459 05/04/98 $539.30 CHEM CONCEPTS Gloves 8376 GENERAL MAINT SAFETY EQUIPME 3353 < *> $539.30* 188460 05/04/98 $40.00 CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATI DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 041598 PWKS ADMIN GEN DUES '& SUBSCRI < *> $40.00* 188461 05/04/98 $5,000.00 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 041498 TOBACCO GRANT PROF SERVICES COUNCIL CHEL., REGISTER 01 -r1nY -1998 (11:12) page 6 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT ------------------------------------------- VENDOR DESCRIPTION ---------------------------- INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM <*> $5,000.00* ------------------- ------------------ - - - - -- 188462 05/04/98 05/04/98 $49.11 CITY OF EDINA SEWER & WATER 050498 GENERAL MAINT SEWER & WATER b5/04/98 $181.48 $357.43 CITY OF EDINA SEWER & WATER 050498 CITY HALL GENE SEWER & WATER 05/04/98 $46.84 CITY OF EDINA CITY OF EDINA SEWER & WATER 050498 PW BUILDING SEWER & WATER 05/04/98 $51.46 CITY OF EDINA SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER 050498 050498 PW BUILDING SEWER & WATER 05/04/98 $54.11 CITY OF EDINA SEWER & WATER 050498 BUILDING MAINT 50TH ST OCCUPA SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER *> 05/04/98 $48.82 CITY OF EDINA SEWER & WATER 050498 VERNON OCCUPAN SEWER & WATER < $789.25* 188463 05/04/98 $1,050.00 CITY OF EDINA Security 041798 CENTENNIAL LAK PROF SERVICES < > $1,050.00* 188464 < *> 05/04/98 $71.00 $71.00* CITY OF EXCELSIOR Annual mtg 311 CITY COUNCIL MEETING EXPENS 3636 188465 *> 05/04/98 $39.00 Clark, Bridget Art work sold 041698 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < $39.00* 188466 *> 05/04/98 $747.30 CLEVELAND GOLF COST OF GOODS - PRO S 239330 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 1758 < $747.30* 188467 *> 05/04/98 $94.00 Combs, Patti Class refund 041598 ART CNTR PROG REGISTRATION F < $94.00* 188468 05/04/98 05/04/98 $547.50 COMPRESS AIR & EQUIPMENT Compressor service ag 045293 FIRE DEPT. GEN EQUIP MAINT < *> $370.20 COMPRESS AIR & EQUIPMENT Filters 045585 WATER TREATMEN REPAIR PARTS 1492 $917.70* 188469 *> 05/04/98 $100.00 Compton, Robert W Concrete 282 GENERAL STORM GENERAL SUPPLI 2784 < $100.00* 188470 05/04/98 05/04/98 $313.17 $40.26 COMPUSA INC COMPUSA NEW EQUIPMENT 49310 CENT SVC GENER NEW EQUIP 3300 < *> $353.43* INC NEW EQUIPMENT 49749 CENT SVC GENER NEW EQUIP 3634 188471 05/04/98 05/04/98 $11.71 $35.15 COMPUTER CITY ACCOUNT RE COMPUTER Misc supplies 208396 ASSESSING GENERAL SUPPLI 3273 < *> $46.86* CITY ACCOUNT RE GENERAL SUPPLIES 208396 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI 3273 188472 *> 05/04/98 $113.04 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS Medical supplies 595821 GENERAL MAINT SAFETY EQUIPME 3459 < $113.04* 188473 *> 05/04/98 $114.01 COPY EQUIPMENT INC. Blueline paper 89214 ENGINEERING GE BLUE PRINTING 3544 < $114.01* 188474 < *> 05/04/98 $90.00 $90.00* Cornelius, Todd AC service 041.798 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES 188475 *> 05/04/98 $123.25 CORTECH CORRECTIONAL TEC EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 1253 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP REPLACEM 3419 < $123.25* 188476 05/04/98 $101.75 Crown Plastic Windshield golf car 61213 GOLF CARS REPAIR PARTS 2992 < > $101.75* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER O1- MAY -1998 (11:12) 7 page CHECK NO ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 188477 05/04/98 $18.63 Crown Trophy Skating medals 041498 ADAPTIVE RECRE GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $18.63* 188478 05/04/98 $885.95 Curtis 1000 Permit stickers 18242301 GENERAL FD PRO DUE FROM HRA 3683 05/04/98 $219.56 Curtis 1000 Envelopes 18368701 CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI 3066 05/04/98 $471.13. Curtis 1000 Labels 18400101 COMMUNICATIONS GENERAL SUPPLI 3066 < *> $1,576.64* 188479 05/04/98 $53.00 D.C. ANNIS SEWER INC Plumbing 2366 CITY HALL GENE CONTR REPAIRS 3639 < *> $53.00* 188480 05/04/98 $284.74 DANKO EMERGENCY EQUIPMEN Rescue equipment 276965 FIRE DEPT. GEN NEW EQUIP 2703 < *> $284.74* 188481 05/04/98 $40.00 DANS REGISTER SERVICE V2 register service 042498 VANVALKENBURG COST OF GD SOL 3788 < *> $40.00* 188482 05/04/98 $100.00 Davis, Brently Michel Perform Edinborough 052198 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $100.00* 188483 05/04/98 $187.90 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 30747 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 05/04/98 $1,717.90 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS' SOLD BE 30836 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 05/04/98 $20.20 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 30841 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 05/04/98 $1,132.12 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 30842 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 05/04/98 -$8.40 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 30842 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 05/04/98 $1,029.10 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 31224 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 05/04/98 $3,272.60 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 31309 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 05/04/98 $887.78 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 31316 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 05/04/98 $691.80 DAY DISTRIBUTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 31709 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE < *> $8,931.00* 188484 05/04/98 $906.50 DCA INC HOSPITALIZATION 103303 CENT SVC GENER HOSPITALIZATIO < *> $906.50* 188485 05/04/98 $4,636.20 DELTA DENTAL HOSPITALIZATION 042798 CENT SVC GENER HOSPITALIZATIO < *> $4,636.20* 188486 05/04/98 $446.63 DELTA FOREMOST CHEMICAL CLEANING SUPPLIES 629355 GRILL CLEANING SUPPL 3592 < *> $446.63* 188487 05/04/98 $61.28 DEXTER SHOE COMPANY COST OF GOODS - PRO S 181677 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 9481 05/04/98 $47.17 DEXTER SHOE COMPANY COST OF GOODS - PRO S 188809 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 9481 05/04/98 $44.17 DEXTER SHOE COMPANY COST OF GOODS - PRO S 95529 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 9481 05/04/98 $65.87 DEXTER SHOE COMPANY COST OF GOODS - PRO S 204690 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 9481 < *> $218.49* 188488 05/04/98 $177.45 DIAMOND ART & CRAFT DIST COST OF GOODS SOLD 171970 ART SUPPLY GIF COST OF GD SOL 3276 < *> $177.45* 188489 05/04/98 $2,031.00 DICKER, TOBIE AC service 041798 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $2,031.00* 188490 05/04/98 $272.00 DIETRICHSON, BILL AC service 041798 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $272.00* COUNCIL CHEC.. REGISTER 01 -i -,^f -1998 (11:12) page 8 CHECK NO -------------------------- DATE CHECK AMOUNT------ - - - - -- VENDOR--------- DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 188491 05/04/98 $222.25 DON BETZEN GOLF CO - - - - -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ COST OF GOODS-- PRO S 7262 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 9483 < *> $222.25* 188492 05/04/98 $265.66 DOOR SERVICE COMPANY Repairs to handicap d 37683 POOL TRACK GRE CONTR REPAIRS 3770 < *> $265.66* 188493 05/04/98 188494 05/04/98 188495 05/04/98 188496 05/04/98 188497 05/04/98 05/04/98 188498 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 188499 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 188500 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 188501 05/04/98 $8,999.76 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP $8,999.76* $60.00 Doyle, Karyn $60.00* $290.18 DRAPER, TOM $290.18* $123.56 E -Z -GO TEXTRON $123.56* $5,305.00 $138.00 $5,443.00* $256.80 $721.36 $77.90 $1,122.83 $397.95 $166.37 $507.88 - $32.64 $164.40 $790.78 $142.70 $519.34 $4,835.67* $208.74 $431.33 $550.00 $1,190.07* $3,901.05 $2,645.00 $2,366:80 $17.20 $269.00 $3,063.05 $3,022.20 $1,616.35 $66.40 $16,967.05* $488.99 $488.99* Eagan General Repair Eagan General Repair EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EAGLE WINE EARL F. ANDERSON EARL F. ANDERSON EARL F. ANDERSON EAST SIDE BEVERAGE EAST SIDE BEVERAGE EAST SIDE BEVERAGE EAST SIDE BEVERAGE EAST SIDE BEVERAGE EAST SIDE BEVERAGE EAST SIDE BEVERAGE EAST SIDE BEVERAGE EAST SIDE BEVERAGE Legal 610490 Swimming lessons 041498 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 041798 LEGAL SERVICES PRO SVC - LEGA ADAPTIVE RECRE PROF SERVICES POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS Cart parts 27545 GOLF CARS REPAIR PARTS 3211 Special ops trailer 10335 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 1105 Spare tires 10336 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 3063 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 98458 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 98459 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 98465 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 98466 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 98476 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 98477 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 98478 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 85118 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 01652 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 01654 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 01662 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 01F63 Line marking paint 8048 GENERAL SUPPLIES 8212 Paint 8219 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 295202 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 295203 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 295204 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 295205 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 295789 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 293261 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 298256 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 298257 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 298267 ECLIPSE CONCERT SYSTEM I 50th liq electrical 500 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE FIELD MAINTENA LINE MARK POWD 3230 PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPLI 3371 CENTENNIAL LAK CONTR REPAIRS 3771 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 50TH ST OCCUPA GENERAL SUPPLI 3014 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 01- MAY -1998 (11:12) page 9 CHECK NO ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 188502 05/04/98 $3,823.72 ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIR Motor starter 241306 PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPLI 2928 < *> $3,823.72* 188503 05/04/98 $500.00 EMPLOYEES CLUB GENERAL SUPPLIES MAY 1998 CONTINGENCIES GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $500.00* 188504 05/04/98 $322.70 EPA AUDIO VISUAL INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 116039 MEDIA LAB GENERAL SUPPLI 3280 < *> $322.70* 188505 05/04/98 $7,000.00 Erickson /GRC Services Legislative consultin 041098 TRAINING FACIL PROF SERVICES < *> $7,000.00* 188506 05/04/98 $372.70 FARBER, DIANE CRAFT SUPPLIES 042498 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES < *> $372.70* 188507 05/04/98 $135.79 FAST 1 HOUR PHOTO ADVERTISING OTHER C49431 ART CENTER ADM ADVERT OTHER 3281 < *> $135.79* 188508 05/04/98 $74.22 FASTSIGN Signs 810004 ED ADMINISTRAT GENERAL SUPPLI 3345 < *> $74.22* 188509 05/04/98 $70.00 FCC Radio license 042098 MAINT OF COURS PROF SERVICES 3410 < *> $70.00* 188510 05/04/98 $168.00 Fifield, Kelli AC service 041798 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $168.00* 188511 05/04/98 $87.00 FINE WINES OF EUROPE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 041398 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE < *> $87.00* 188512 05/04/98 $833.69 FISHER SCIENTIFIC Lab supplies 1659292 LABORATORY GENERAL SUPPLI 3098 < *> $833.69* 188513 05/04/98 $85.16 FOOT -JOY COST OF GOODS - PRO S 5557137 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 8830 < *> $85.16* 188514 05/04/98 $97.29 Foremost Sales & Service Shop 13422 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 2972 < *> $97.29* 188515 05/04/98 $195.00 Forsythe Appraisal Inc Armstrong est appras 122297 PUBLIC HEALTH PROF SERVICES < *> $195.00* 188516 05/04/98 $97.61 Fowler Electric REPAIR PARTS 51865700 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 1423 05/04/98 $61.70 Fowler Electric REPAIR PARTS 52141100 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 2478 < *> $159.31* 188517 05/04/98 $314.19 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS TPLRPHONE 041598 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE < *> $314.19* 188518 05/04/98 $44.82 G & K DIRECT PURCHASE LAUNDRY 43697 PUMP & LIFT ST LAUNDRY 05/04/98 $25.36 G & K DIRECT PURCHASE LAUNDRY 46348 PUMP & LIFT ST LAUNDRY 3464 < *> $70.18* 188519 05/04/98 $8.52 G.E. Capital EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 130053 ASSESSING EQUIP REPLACEM 7638 05/04/98 $82.69 G.E. Capital DATA PROCESSING 133879 CENT SVC GENER DATA PROCESSIN 9004 COUNCIL CHEC.. REGISTER 01 -- -f -1998 (11:12) page 10 CHECK NO --------------------------- DATE CHECK AMOUNT ---------------------------------------------------------- VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 188519 05/04/98 - $13.46 G.E. Capital DATA PROCESSING - ----------------------------------------------- 158686 CENT SVC GENER DATA PROCESSIN 9004 05/04/98 $1,732.62 G.E. Capital EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 296057 ENGINEERING GE EQUIP REPLACEM 2941 05/04/98 $570.84 G.E. Capital EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 298467 ENGINEERING GE EQUIP REPLACEM 3299 < *> $2,381.21* 188520 05/04/98 $100.00 GAGLIARDIE, CELESTE Perform Edinborough 052898 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $100.00* 188521 05/04/98 $312.96 GALL'S INC UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 52208558 POLICE DEPT. G UNIF ALLOW 2467 < *> $312.96* 188522 05/04/98 $180.00 GARDER, DOUG AC service 041798 a ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $180.00* 188523 05/04/98 $300.00 GEISHEKER, PATRICIA AC service 041798 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $300.00* . 188524 05/04/98 $505.85 GENERAL SPORTS B -ball t- shirts 48003 ADAPTIVE RECRE GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $505.85* 188525 05/04/98 $27.30 GETSINGER, DONNA Art work sold 041698 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $27.30* 188526 05/04/98 $60.00 GLEN SIPE PIANO SERVICE Piano tuning 980414 POOL TRACK GRE SVC CONTR EQUI < *> $60.00* 188527 05/04/98 $96.00 GLEWWE, LINDA AC service 041798 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $96.00* 188528 05/04/98 $250.00 Government Finance Offic DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 53911 FINANCE DUES & SUBSCRI < *> $250.00* 188529 05/04/98 $21.00 Government Finance Offic Prefund benefit book 0282971 FINANCE BOOKS & PAMPHL 3400 < *> $21.00* 188530 05/04/98 $281.35 Gow, Joyce Art work sold 041698 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $281.35* 188531 05/04/98 $276.56 GRAINGER GENERAL SUPPLIES 49878580 ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPLI 3116 05/04/98 05/04/98 $46.09 GRAINGER Soccer field supplies 49529817 FIELD MAINTENA GENERAL SUPPLI 3237 05/04/98 $53.14 $148.04 GRAINGER GRAINGER Elec parts 49530001 ST LIGHTING OR GENERAL SUPPLI 3250 05/04/98 $43.91 GRAINGER GENERAL SUPPLIES 49530128 PAVEMENT MARKI GENERAL SUPPLI 3259 05/04/98 $105.10 GRAINGER GENERAL SUPPLIES 49530152 PAVEMENT MARKI GENERAL SUPPLI 3259 05/04/98 $69.14 GRAINGER GENERAL SUPPLIES Soccer field supplies 49530155 49530389 PAVEMENT MARKI FIELD GENERAL SUPPLI 3259 < *> $741.98* MAINTENA GENERAL SUPPLI 3237 1A05 32 05/04/98 $630.00 GRAPE. BEGINNING!, INC COST OF GOODS; , ;ol,l) W1 111 -732 YORK :SELLING CST OF Gn WINE 05/04/98 $1119.()() GRADE HEc;INNIN( ;.,; INC COST OF c'00DS; :u01.0 W1 111112 50111 ST SELLIN CST OF GU WINE 05/04/98 $537.00 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 18837 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $1,356.00* 188533 05/04/98 -$1.70 GRAUSAM, STEVE Over /under 041398 GENERAL FD PRO'CASH OVER AND 05/04/98 05/04/98 $16.00 GRAUSAM, STEVE DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 041398 LIQUOR 50TH ST. DUES & SUBSCRI $10.95 GRAUSAM, STEVE GENERAL SUPPLIES 041398 LIQUOR 50TH ST GENERAL SUPPLI COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 01- MAY -1998 (11:12) page 11 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 188533 05/04/98 $15.80 GRAUSAM, STEVE GENERAL SUPPLIES 041398 50TH ST OCCUPA GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $41.05* 188534 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 188535 05/04/98 188536 05/04/98 05/04/98 188538 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 $205.55 $290.94 $102.77 $891.30 $112.05 $1,602.61* GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. $902.42 GREER, PAT $902.42* $5,000.00 $17,594.00 $22,594.00* $17.34 $763.14 $639.87 $69.36 $949.13 $38.41 $1,045.53 $1,983.64 $37.59 $5,871.63 $240.15 $0.45 $66.45 $17.34 $2,902.54 $1,220.10 $7.11 $69.36 $2,132.46 $2,085.84 $68.48 $20,225.92* GREUPNER, JOE GREUPNER, JOE GRIGGS COOPER & CO. GRIGGS COOPER & CO. GRIGGS COOPER & CO. GRIGGS COOPER & CO. GRIGGS COOPER & CO. GRIGGS COOPER & CO. GRIGGS COOPER & CO. GRIGGS COOPER & CO. GRIGGS COOPER & CO. GRIGGS COOPER & CO. GRIGGS COOPER & CO. GRIGGS COOPER & CO. GRIGGS COOPER & CO. GRIGGS COOPER & CO. GRIGGS COOPER & CO. GRIGGS COOPER & CO. GRIGGS COOPER & CO. GRIGGS COOPER & CO. GRIGGS COOPER & CO. GRIGGS COOPER & CO. GRIGGS COOPER & CO. bIllbfj .10414322 POOL TRACK GRL GENERAL SUPPLI 3121 Bulbs 10414851 POOL TRACK GRE GENERAL SUPPLI 3127 Bulbs 10414878 POOL TRACK GRE GENERAL SUPPLI 3127 elec supplies 10415204 STREET REVOLVI GENERAL SUPPLI 8906 Bulbs 10415410 POOL TRACK GRE GENERAL SUPPLI 3497 Services MAY 1998 ED ADMINISTRAT PROF SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SVCS - G 0427 PROFESSIONAL SVCS - G 042798 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 98462 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 98463 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 98464 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 98469 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 98470 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 98471 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 98472 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 98479 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 98480 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 98481 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 98482 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 99799 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 01653 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 01656 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 01657 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 01660 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 01661 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 01665 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 01666 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 01669 COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 01670 GOLF ADMINISTR PRO SVC - GOLF GOLF ADMINISTR PRO SVC - GOLF 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 188539 05/04/98 $19,883.00 Grossman Chevrolet Compa EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 70466 EQUIPMENT REPL EQUIP REPLACEM 1329 < *> $19,883.00* 188540 05/04/98 $328.08 H.R. Peterson Company CLEANING SUPPLIES 56726 CLUB HOUSE CLEANING SUPPL 3595 < *> $328.08* 188541 05/04/98 $30.00 HALL, MARILYN Program Edinborough 051498 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $30.00* 188542 05/04/98 $85.00 HALL, MARY Service Edinborough 052698 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $85.00* 188543 05/04/98 $660.83 HALLMAN OIL COMPANY Street dept 306180 EQUIPMENT OPER LUBRICANTS 7373 < *> $660.83* COUNCIL CHEC. REGISTER O1 --.f -1998 (11:12) page 12 CHECK NO --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 188544 05/04/98 05/04/98 $31.31 Hamco Data Products GENERAL SUPPLIES 41018 50TH ST SELLIN GENERAL SUPPLI 3455 05/04/98 $31.31 $31.31 Hamco Data Products Hamco GENERAL SUPPLIES 41018 YORK SELLING GENERAL SUPPLI 3455 Data Products GENERAL SUPPLIES 41018 VERNON SELLING GENERAL SUPPLI 3455 < *> $93.93* 188545 05/04/98 $17,028.00 HARRIS HOMEYER CO. INSURANCE 5270 CENT SVC GENER INSURANCE 05/04/98 $16,107.00 HARRIS HOMEYER CO. INSURANCE 5272 CENT SVC GENER INSURANCE < *> $33,135.00* 188546 05/04/98 $7,082.00 Hartland Fuel Products L GASOLINE 236614 EQUIPMENT OPER GASOLINE 05/04/98 $4,452.23 Hartland Fuel Products L GASOLINE 236649 EQUIPMENT OPER GASOLINE < *> $11,534.23* 188547 05/04/98 $132.00 HAYNES, PATRICIA Gallery PT 041798 ART SUPPLY GIF PROF SERVICES < *> $132.00* 188548 05/04/98 $47,056.43 HEALTH PARTNERS HOSPITALIZATION 7993922 CENT SVC GENER HOSPITALIZATIO < *> $47,056.43* 188549 05/04/98 $536.00 HEALTH PARTNERS Ins pd twice 972511 GENERAL FD PRO AMBULANCE FEES < *> $536.00* 188550 05/04/98 $178.00 HEALTH PARTNERS HOSPITALIZATION 1725877 CENT SVC GENER HOSPITALIZATIO < *> $178.00* 188551 05/04/98 $40.00 HEDGES, DIANA POSTAGE 041798 CENT SVC GENER POSTAGE 05/04/98 $55.47 HEDGES, DIANA GENERAL SUPPLIES 041798 ART CENTER ADM GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $95.47* 188552 05/04/98 $734.59 Heller Finance Inc COST OF GOODS - PRO S 200327 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 8833 < *> $734.59* 188553 05/04/98 $1,246.50 Heller Finance Inc COST OF GOODS - PRO S 74349 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 8821 < *> $1,246.50* 188554 05/04/98 $210.00 Heller Finance Inc COST OF GOODS - PRO S 74352 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR < *> $210.00* 188555 05/04/98 $33,711.51 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURE first half HRA 042398 GENERAL FD PRO DUE FROM HRA 05/04/98 $6,202.78 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURE First half specials 042398 SPECIAL ASSESS EQUIP REPLACEM < *> $39,914.29* 188556 05/04/98 $75.00 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURE CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 042798 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $75.00* 188557 *> 05/04/98 $50.00 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURE Road permit 26126 DISTRIBUTION LIC & PERMITS 3654 < $50.00* 188558 05/04/98 $143.25 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLE Fire instuctor trg 31899 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONF & SCHOOLS 2357 < *> $143.25* 188559 *> 05/04/98 $399.38 HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MANUF Field paint 44291 FIELD MAINTENA METER RDNG SUP 2401 < $399.38* 188560 05/04/98 $724.61 HJ GLOVE OF AMERICA COST OF GOODS - PRO S LS040198 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 1721 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 01- MAY -1998 (11:12) page 13 CHECK NO ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 188560 05/04/98 $557.53 HJ GLOVE OF AMERICA COST OF GOODS - PRO S LSO40198 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 1721 < *> $1,282.14* 188561 05/04/98 $24.50 Home Enviroment Center Water treatment 251 CITY HALL GENE CONTR REPAIRS < *> $24.50* 188562 05/04/98 $70.50 Home Juice COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 13876 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> - $70.50* 188563 05/04/98 $76.69 HOOTENS LAUNDRY 041198 POLICE DEPT. G LAUNDRY < *> $76.69* 188564 05/04/98 $84.34 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL Chlorine, acid 17416 POOL TRACK GRE CHEMICALS 3125 < *> $84.34* 188565 05/04/98 $81.57 HORWATH, TOM MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 041398 TREES & MAINTE MILEAGE < *> $81.57* 188566 05/04/98 $18.00 Hovde Plumbing Jab canceled 98001200 GENERAL FD PRO MECHAN PERMITS < *> $18.00* 188567 05/04/98 $233.87 HPI International Inc PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 129453 POLICE DEPT. G PHOTO SUPPLIES 3297 < *> $233.87* 188568 05/04/98 $8.28 HUEBSCH Towels 525142 POOL TRACK GRE SVC CONTR EQUI 05/04/98 $54.12 HUEBSCH SERVICE CONTRACTS EQU 529752 POOL TRACK GRE SVC CONTR EQUI < *> $62.40* 188569. 05/04/98 $30.00 HUMPHREY, CAROLE Program CL 060298 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $30.00* 188570 05/04/98 $19,443.34 HUNERBERG CONSTRUCTION C EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 042098 PKBOND CIP EQUIP REPLACEM 05/04/98 $19,443.33 HUNERBERG CONSTRUCTION C EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 042098 PKBOND CIP EQUIP REPLACEM 05/04/98 $19,443.34 HUNERBERG CONSTRUCTION C EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 042098 PKBOND CIP EQUIP REPLACEM 05/04/98 $19,443.33 HUNERBERG CONSTRUCTION C EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 042098 PKBOND CIP EQUIP REPLACEM 05/04/98 $19,443.33 HUNERBERG CONSTRUCTION C EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 042098 PKBOND CIP EQUIP REPLACEM 05/04/98 $19,443.33 HUNERBERG CONSTRUCTION C EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 042098 PKBOND CIP EQUIP REPLACEM < *> $116,660.00* 188571 05/04/98 $1,017.56 HYDRO SUPPLY CO Water meters 12755 UTILITY PROG INVENTORY WATE 6388 < *> $1,017.56* 188572 05/04/98 $48.18 Ikon Office Solutions Copies 111729 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 5258 < *> $48.18* 188573 05/04/98 $90.06 INDELCO PLASTIC CORP Plumbing parts 149121 BUILDING MAINT REPAIR PARTS 3258 < *> $90.06* 188574 05/04/98 $69.00 INTERIOR COMMUNICATIONS Repairs 29736 ED ADMINISTRAT SVC CONTR EQUI 05/04/98 $98.00 INTERIOR COMMUNICATIONS Phone programming 29737 ED ADMINISTRAT PROF SERVICES 05/04/98 $108.00 INTERIOR COMMUNICATIONS Repairs 29763 ED ADMINISTRAT CONTR REPAIRS 05/04/98 $29.00 INTERIOR COMMUNICATIONS Phone repairs 29765 ED ADMINISTRAT PROF SERVICES < *> $304.00* 188575 05/04/98 $139.63 IOS CAPITAL Copy machine lease 40526838 PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLI 5258 COUNCIL CHEL.. REGISTER 01 -1-iNY -1998 (11:12) page 14 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT -------------------------------- VENDOR --------------------------- DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM <*> $139.63* --------------------------- ---------------------------- 188576 *> 05/04/98 $3,299.00 ISTP -Sport on the Run ADVERTISING OTHER 040198 GOLF ADMINISTR ADVERT OTHER 3341 < $3,299.00* 188577 *> 05/04/98 $333.75 ITASCA GREENHOUSE INC Tree /plantings 98424 TREES & MAINTE PLANT & TREES 2884 < $333.75* 188578 05/04/98 05/04/98 $222.60 J.H. LARSON ELECTRICAL C Utilities electric 40608840 PUMP & LIFT ST GENERAL SUPPLI 3313 05/04/98 $195.86 $148.46 J.H. LARSON ELECTRICAL J.H. LARSON ELECTRICAL C AC electrical C AC electrical 40613770 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI 3376 05/04/98 $545.27 J.H. LARSON ELECTRICAL C AC electric 40615330 40600170 ART CENTER BLD ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI GENERAL SUPPLI 3384 *> 05/04/98 $69.38 J.N. LARSON ELECTRICAL C REPAIR PARTS 40623190 CITY HALL GENE REPAIR PARTS 3159 3490 < $1,181.57* 188579 *> 05/04/98 $7,800.00 JAMES STEELE CONSTRUCTIO Fire station II FINAL PY NEW STATION EQUIP REPLACEM < $7,800.00* 188580 05/04/98 05/04/98 $900.80 Jeane Thorne Inc PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 195438 INSPECTIONS PROF SERVICES < *> $608.40 $1,509.20* Jeane Thorne Inc PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 195876 INSPECTIONS PROF SERVICES 188581 05/04/98 05/04/98 $10.27 JERRY'S FOODS GENERAL SUPPLIES 041598 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 05/04/98 $57.20 $169.94 JERRY'S JERRY'S FOODS FOODS REPAIR PARTS 041598 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 05/04/98 $148.37 JERRY'S FOODS COST OF GOODS SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES 041598 041598 GRILL ART CENTER ADM COST OF GD SOL GENERAL < *> $385.78* SUPPLI 188582 05/04/98 05/04/98 $228.98 JERRY'S PRINTING PRINTING 4412 INSPECTIONS PRINTING 05/04/98 $483.04 $210.87 JERRY'S JERRY'S PRINTING PRINTING Inspection forms A4395 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 1474 05/04/98 $935.00 JERRY'S PRINTING PRINTING PRINTING 5129 5313 INSPECTIONS ART CENTER ADM PRINTING PRINTING < *> $1,857.89* 2298 188583 05/04/98 $17.59 JERRY'S TRANSMTSSTON SER Rolay 141122 FIRE DEPT. GEN REPAIR PARTS 3051 <,> $17.59* 188584 *> 05/04/98 $3,920.00 JMS Communications k Res Consultant fee 040698 I -494 COMMISSI PROF SERVICES < $3,920.00* 188585 *> 05/04/98 $278.64 Johnson Wholesale Floris Plants, moss 34856 POOL TRACK GRE TREES FLWR SHR 3124 < $278.64* 188588 05/04/98 05/04/98 -$6.37 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 56826 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/04/98 - $10.30 - $20.60 JOHNSON JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 57408 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/04/98 -$4.82 JOHNSON WINE CO. WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 57411 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/04/98 -$2.62 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF WI 57469 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/04/98 - $10.30 JOHNSON WINE CO. GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD WI WI 57470 57505 50TH ST SELLIN 50TH CST OF GD WINE 05/04/98 -$7.23 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 57723 ST SELLIN 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE CST OF GD WINE 05/04/98 05/04/98 -$8.27 -$7.23 JOHNSON JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 57724 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/04/98 -$5.75 JOHNSON WINE CO. WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 57725 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/04/98 - $73.35 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF WI 57726 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/04/98 $74.80 JOHNSON WINE CO. GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD WI WI 57811 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 830794 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 01- MAY -1998 (11:12) page 15 CHECK NO ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 188588 05/04/98 $74.20 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 830795 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 05/04/98 $1,494.29 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 830796 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/04/98 $2,500.55 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 830797 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 05/04/98 $1,092.63 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 830798 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/04/98 $4,812.79 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 830799 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/04/98 $1,179.40 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 830800 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/04/98 $3,136.78 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 830801 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/04/98 $1,956.53 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 830802 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/04/98 $74.20 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 833408 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 05/04/98 $4,150.58 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 833411 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/04/98 $5,525.53 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 833412 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/04/98 $3,600.44 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 833413 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/04/98 $1,302.34 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 833414 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/04/98 $114.75 JOHNSON WINE CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 833415 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE < *> $30,932.97* 188589 05/04/98 $22.50 JOHNSON, NAOMI Art work sold 042498 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER 05/04/98 $141.19 JOHNSON, NAOMI CRAFT SUPPLIES 042498 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES 05/04/98 $34.94 JOHNSON, NAOMI PRINTING 042498 ART CENTER ADM PRINTING 05/04/98 $5.34 JOHNSON, NAOMI Media general supplie 042498 MEDIA LAB GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $203.97* 188590 05/04/98 $360.00 JOHNSON, RICHARD H. AC service 041798 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $360.00* 188591 05/04/98 $264.00 Jonas, Lenore AC service 041798 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $264.00* 188592 05/04/98 $223.50 JORDAN BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 47054 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 05/04/98 $155.40 JORDAN BEVERAGE COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 47060 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE < *> $378.90* 188593 05/04/98 $820.05 K.C. GROVES TREE EXPERTS Tree removal 042798 TREES 3 YEAR CIP < *> $820.05* 188594 05/04/98 $3,333.00 KAHN, DEBORAH MORSE Services 0420 COMMUNICATIONS MAG /NEWSLET EX 05/04/98 $250.00 KAHN, DEBORAH MORSE Service 042098 COMMUNICATIONS MAG /NEWSLET EX < *> $3,583.00* 188595 05/04/98 $18.00 Kaplan, Carole Refund handicap servi 041698 GOLF PROG COMPUTR HANDIC < *> $18.00* 188596 05/04/98 $225.28 KAR PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 718639 MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPLI 2986 05/04/98 $41.23 KAR PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 718640 MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPLI 2986 05/04/98 $23.72 KAR PRODUCTS shop supplies 721;R24 MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPLI 3206 < *> $290.23* 188597 05/04/98 $7.95 KATTREH, ANN POSTAGE 042798 ED ADMINISTRAT POSTAGE 05/04/98 $29.69 KATTREH, ANN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 042798 POOL TRACK GRE PROF SERVICES 05/04/98 $215.68 KATTREH, ANN GENERAL SUPPLIES 042798 POOL TRACK GRE GENERAL SUPPLI 05/04/98 $18.05 KATTREH, ANN PAINT 042798 POOL TRACK GRE PAINT < *> $271.37* 188598 05/04/98 $29.25 Keenan, Lori Art work sold 041698 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $29.25* COUNCIL CHE( -.. REGISTER 01- ,...)f -1998 (11:12) page 16 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 188599 05/04/98 $85.84 KEPRIOS, JOHN Reimburse vet bill 042798 MAINT OF COURS PROF SERVICES < *> $85.84* 188600 05/04/98 05/04/98 c *> 188601 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 $1,192.80 $244.37 $1,437.17* $72.80 $1,122.15 $27.95 $53.60 $601.00 $167.60 $1,166.50 - $22.50 - $40.30 $342.90 $593.25 $4,084.95* KINKO'S KINKO'S Kiwi Kai Imports Inc Kiwi Kai Imports Inc Kiwi Kai Imports Inc Kiwi Kai Imports Inc Kiwi Kai Imports Inc Kiwi Kai Imports Inc Kiwi Kai Imports Inc Kiwi Kai Imports Inc Kiwi Kai Imports Inc Kiwi Kai Imports Inc Kiwi Kai Imports Inc Mailing copies sump p 06220001 SUMP PUMP INSP CIP 2821 Copies BoR 06220001 ASSESSING PRINTING Credit taken twice CM3239. COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 89761 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 89762 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 89763 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 89820 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 89822 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 89827 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI CM4169 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI CM4169 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 90072 COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 90073 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 188602 05/04/98 $48.75 Kloppmann, Maren - Art work sold 041 -698 ART CNTR FROG SALES OTHER < *> $48.75* 188603 05/04/98 $76.41 KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT Building supplies 319825 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 3086 05/04/98 $7.73 KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT Building supplies 320121 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 3102 05/04/98 $25.62 KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT Builder supplies 320141 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 3104 05/04/98 $75.86 KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT GENERAL SUPPLIES 320170 ARENA BLDG /GRO GENERAL SUPPLI 3134 05/04/98 $40.26 KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT Formica 200375 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI 2913 05/04/98 $49.53 KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT Tools 321072 FIELD MAINTENA TOOLS 3245 05/04/98 $34:31 KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT Street supplies 321304 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 3304 05/04/98 $222.57 KNOX COMMERCIAL CREDIT Street dept supplies 321337 SNOW & ICE REM GENERAL SUPPLI 3308 < *> $532.29* 188604 05/04/98 $852.00 KOCHENASH, RICK AC service 041798 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $852.00* 188605 05/04/98 $50.38 KOMADINA, KEVIN H. Art work sold 041698 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $50.38* 188606 05/04/98 $781.70 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD HE 208460 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 05/04/98 $15.95 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO _COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 208461 50TH ST S_ELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 05/04/98 $1,670.50 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 208528 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 05/04/98 $863.45 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 208991 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 05/04/98 $15.95 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 208992 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 05/04/98 $957.75 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 209042 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 05/04/98 $31.90 KUETHER DISTRIBUTING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 209043 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $4,337.20* 188607 05/04/98 $47.62 Kl1YPER, SCOTT CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 041798 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $47.62* 188608 05/04/98 $985.13 LAND CARE EQUIPMENT CO Street 019866 STREET REVOLVI GENERAL SUPPLI 2501 05/04/98 $205.01 LAND CARE EQUIPMENT CO GENERAL SUPPLIES 019883 STREET REVOLVI GENERAL SUPPLI 3573 < *> $1,190.14* COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER O1- MAY -1998 (11:12) page 17 CHECK NO ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 188609 05/04/98 $67.20 LANIER WORLDWIDE INC SERVICE CONTRACTS EQU WR050193 POLICE DEPT. G SVC CONTR EQUI < *> $67.20* 188610 05/04/98 $1,941.00 LaVan Floor Covering Com Install carpet 32474 CLUB HOUSE GENERAL SUPPLI 2448 < *> $1,941.00* 188611 05/04/98 $135.58 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 1908555 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 3253 .05/04/98 $406.50 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 1908556 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 3256 05/04/98 $69.31 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. ACCESSORIES 1908557 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES . 3256 05/04/98 $248.15 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. Utilities 1908558 DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLI 3255 05/04/98 $256.94 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. Sign shop 1908559 STREET NAME SI GENERAL SUPPLI 3254 05/04/98 $134.81 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. Parks 1908560 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 3257 05/04/98 $177.89 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. Cable ties 1915253 WATER TREATMEN GENERAL SUPPLI 3471 < *> $1,429.18* 188612 05/04/98 $100.00 LEBERT, ANITA Consult fee 031998 GOLF ADMINISTR PERS SERVICES < *> $100.00* 188613 05/04/98 $45.47 LEE, MARGE E Art work sold 041698 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $45.47* 188648 05/04/98 $3,573.51 Mills Engineering Compan Trash cans 11192 SWIM PROG MACH. & EQUIP 1868 < *> $3,573.51* 188649 05/04/98 $2,070.00 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN S Replace service 31280 DISTRIBUTION CONTR REPAIRS 3556 05/04/98 $1,125.00 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN S Replace service 31281 DISTRIBUTION CONTR REPAIRS 3557 05/04/98 $759.00 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN S Replace service 31282 DISTRIBUTION CONTR REPAIRS 3646 05/04/98 $819.00 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN S Replace service 31283 DISTRIBUTION CONTR REPAIRS 3645 < *> $4,773.00* 188650 05/04/98 $960.00 MINNEAPOLIS COMMUNITY CO CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 98166 POLICE DEPT. G CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $960.00* 188651 05/04/98 $8,311.36 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPA Water purchased 041198 DISTRIBUTION WATER PURCHASE < *> $8,311.36* 188652 05/04/98 $125.72 MINNEGASCO HEAT 040898 YORK FIRE STAT HEAT < *> $125.72* 188653 05/04/98 $1,500.00 MINNESOTA AMBULANCE ASSN MN amb assc dues 042098 FIRE DEPT. GEN DUES & SUBSCRI < *> $1,500.00* 188654 05/04/98 $175.00 MINNESOTA D.A.R.E. OFFIC DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 69 DARE DUES & SUBSCRI < *> $175.00* 188655 05/04/98 $52.25 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF Material testing PA000090 STREET IMPROVE CIP < *> $52.25* 188656 05/04/98 $208.80 MINNESOTA GLOVE INC Street dept boots 017311 PUMP & LIFT ST SAFETY EQUIPME 3310 < *> $208.80* 188657 05/04/98 $35.00 MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOC CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 050498 PLANNING CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $35.00* 188658 05/04/98 $86.97 MINNESOTA PLASTICS Parts •152143 RANGE REPAIR PARTS COUNCIL CHEF.. REGISTER 01 --..,Y -1998 (11:12) page 18 CHECK NO DATE CHECK AMOUNT ------------------------------------ VENDOR DESCRIPTION -------------------------------------------------------------- INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM <*> $86.97* 188659 05/04/98 $165.00 MINNESOTA SAFETY COUNCIL Confined space class 69346 FIRE DEPT. GEN CONF & SCHOOLS 1115 05/04/98 $236.00 MINNESOTA SAFETY COUNCIL DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 012141 ADMINISTRATION DUES & SUBSCRI < *> $401.00* 188660 05/04/98 $250.10 MINNESOTA SUN PUBLICATIO Help wanted ads 095908 CENT SVC GENER ADVERT PERSONL < *> $250.10* 188661 05/04/98 $7.00 Minnesota Vikings Food S MEETING EXPENSE 1610214 I -494 COMMISSI MEETING EXPENS < *> $7.00* 188662 05/04/98 $580.66 Mizuno USA Inc COST OF GOODS - PRO S 934357 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 1727 < *> $580.66* 188663 05/04/98 $18.00 MNSCIA DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 042098 POLICE DEPT. G DUES & SUBSCRI < *> $18.00* 188664 05/04/98 $25.00 MOBILE CELLULAR UNLIMITE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 031398P POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP MAINT < *> $25.00* 188665 05/04/98 $873.54 MOORE MEDICAL Ambulance supplies 9695846 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 3056 < *> $873.54* 188666 05/04/98 $405.44 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO Irrigation parts I210786 MAINT OF COURS IRRIGATION EQU 3213 05/04/98 05/04/98 $145.50 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO rollers I211036 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI 3214 05/04/98 $54.63 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO REPAIR PARTS I211302 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 3404 05/04/98 $20.60 $84.26 MTI DISTRIBUTING CO MTI Saw blades I211500 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI 3772 DISTRIBUTING CO Irrigation parts I212265 MAINT OF COURS IRRIGATION EQU 3408 < *> $710.43* 188667 *> 05/04/98 $132.15 MUZAK SERVICE CONTRACTS EQU 050198 CENTENNIAL LAK SVC CONTR EQUI < $132.15* 188668 05/04/98 $193.35 National Fire Protection Sprinkler books 0131906 FIRE DEPT. GEN BOOKS & PAMPHL 3060 < *> $193.35* 188669 05/04/98 $46.90 NATIONAL INFORMATION DAT Zip code directory 042298 FINANCE GENERAL SUPPLI 3701 < *> $46.90* 188670 05/04/98 $544.00 NELSON, J THOMAS AC service 041798 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $544.00* 188671 05/04/98 $11.70 NELSON, SUZANNE Art work sold 041698 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $11.70* 188672 05/04/98 $170.50 New Tribe Weed pulling tool 7001 GENERAL TURF C TOOLS 3024 < *> $170.50* 188673 05/04/98 $2,450.00 Noel Painting Painting 042798 PKBOND CIP EQUIP REPLACEM < *> $2,450.00* 188674 05/04/98 $27.00 NORTH STAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 91199 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 05/04/98 05/04/98 $125.04 NORTH STAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 85787 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX $27:90 NORTH STAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 90580 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 01- MAY -1998 (11:12) page 19 CHECK NO ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 188674 05/04/98 $55.80 NORTH STAR ICE COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 92215 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $235.74* 188675 05/04/98 $119.05 NORTH STAR TURF REPAIR PARTS 165171 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 2989 05/04/98 $352.79 NORTH STAR TURF REPAIR PARTS 165183. MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 3206 05/04/98 05/04/98 $7.41 $6.54 NORTH STAR TURF NORTH REPAIR PARTS 165550 MAINT OF LOURS REPAIR PARTS 2989 05/04/98 $171.03 STAR TURF NORTH STAR TURF REPAIR PARTS 165559 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 3206 05/04/98 $52.40 NORTH STAR TURF REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS 165566 165651 MAINT OF COURS MAINT OF COURS REPAIR REPAIR PARTS PARTS 3208 05/04/98 $34.64 NORTH STAR TURF REPAIR PARTS 165652 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 2989 2990 < *> $743.86* 188676 05/04/98 $315.72 NORTHERN HYDRAULICS Street dept tarps 50273371 SNOW & ICE REM GENERAL SUPPLI 3307 < *> $315.72* 188677 05/04/98 05/04/98 $220.71 NORTHERN GENERAL SUPPLIES 82139116 MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPLI 3212 05/04/98 $85.15 $57.49 NORTHERN NORTHERN GENERAL SUPPLIES 19358801 SNOW & ICE REM GENERAL SUPPLI 3470 < *> $363.35* GENERAL SUPPLIES 32630606 SNOW & ICE REM GENERAL SUPPLI 3386 188678 05/04/98 $267.57 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY COST OF GOODS SOLD 264026 ART SUPPLY GIF COST OF GD SOL 2728 05/04/98 $125.21 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY COST OF GOODS SOLD 264354 ART SUPPLY GIF COST OF GD SOL 3284 < *> $392.78* 188679 05/04/98 $612.84 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO TIRES & TUBES 45435 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES 3110 05/04/98 05/04/98 $232.69 . $20.77 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO NORTHWESTERN TIRES & TUBES 45572 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES 3110 TIRE CO Tires shop 45681 EQUIPMENT OPER TIRES & TUBES 3110 < *> $866.30* 188680 05/04/98 $90.00 NPPTA NPPTA membership 042298 TENNIS INSTRUC GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $90.00* 188681 05/04/98 $29,509.72 -NSP LIGHT & POWER 050498 ST LIGHTING RE LIGHT & POWER 05/04/98 05/04/98 $3,613.32 $1,756.43 NSP NSP LIGHT & POWER 050498 ST LIGHTING OR LIGHT & POWER 05/04/98 $37.68 NSP LIGHT & POWER 050498 PARKING RAMP LIGHT & POWER 05/04/98 $31.32 NSP LIGHT & POWER 050498 CIVIL DEFENSE LIGHT & POWER 05/04/98 $2,225.10 NSP LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER 050498 CITY HALL GENE LIGHT & POWER 05/04/98 $3,797.62 NSP LIGHT & POWER 050498 050498 PW BUILDING BUILDING MAINT LIGHT & LIGHT & POWER POWER 05/04/98 05/04/98 $748.33 $221.06 NSP NSP LIGHT & POWER 050498 PUMP & LIFT ST LIGHT & POWER < *> $41,940.58* LIGHT & POWER 050498 DISTRIBUTION LIGHT & POWER 188682 *> 05/04/98 $10.00 O'Toole, Mary Overpaid pool pass 042198 POOL ADMIN SEASON TICKETS < $10.00* 188683 < *> 05/04/98 $384.00 $384.00* ODLAND, DOROTHY AC service 041798 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES 188684 *> 05/04/98 $841.34 Office Depot Fireproof 4 drawer fi 042198 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI < $841.34* 188685 05/04/98 $70.93 Olsen Chain & Cable Co I Chain binder 76884 BUILDING MAINT TOOLS 3314 05/04/98 $154.83 Olsen Chain & Cable Co I Tools 77623 MAINT OF COURS TOOLS 3405 < *> $225.76* COUNCIL CHEL.. REGISTER Program Edinborough 01 --...f -1998 (11:12) ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER $30.00* 20 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 042498 GENERAL $193.75 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 53403300 page CHECK NO DATE -------------------------------------------`------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 188686 05/04/98 $7,903.98 OPM- INFORMATION SYSTEM Replacement hardware 343160 CENT SVC GENER EQUIP REPLACEM 2795 < *> $999.99 $7,903.98* Redo ballfield at web 033198 FIELD MAINTENA CONTR REPAIRS 3730 $820.00 - PERKINS LANDSCAPE CONTRA 188687 05/04/98 $59.64 ORKIN EXTERMINATING. Pest control 824919 CITY HALL GENE CONTR REPAIRS 3638 < *> $515.00 $59.64* PROFESSIONAL SERVICES J103949 POLICE DEPT. G PROF SERVICES $515.00* 188688 05/04/98 $68.90 PALM BROTHERS Kitchen utensils 0411474 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 3062 < *> $68.90* 188689 05/04/98 188690 05/04/98 188691 05/04/98 188692 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 188693 05/04/98 05/04/98 188694 188696 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 $1,256.70 Park Lighting Inc $1,256.70* $200.00 Paula Arnold M.A. $200.00* Lights 1296 Leisure discovery day 042298 POOL TRACK GRE GENERAL SUPPLI 3128 ADAPTIVE RECRE PROF SERVICES $30.00 PELECIS, MARA Program Edinborough 051998 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER $30.00* 042498 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 042498 GENERAL $193.75 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 53403300 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX $180.60 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 53403399 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX $199.45 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY V2 concessions 55102140 VANVALKENSURG COST OF GD SOL 3685 $573.80* OR ALLOWANCE 042498 GENERAL SUPPLIES 042498 $999.99 PERKINS LANDSCAPE CONTRA Redo ballfield at web 033198 FIELD MAINTENA CONTR REPAIRS 3730 $820.00 - PERKINS LANDSCAPE CONTRA Grading at pool 042498 POOL OPERATION CONTR REPAIRS 3742 $1,819.99* GENERAL SUPPLIES 042498 GENERAL SUPPLIES $515.00 PERSONNEL DECISIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES J103949 POLICE DEPT. G PROF SERVICES $515.00* $2.00 $4.40 $42.28 $16.18 $21.00 $7.68 $7.04 $15.55 $21.50 $19.05 $5.00 $7.00 $6.00 $10.00 $9.79 $9.41 $6.37 $1.47 $19.97 $15.96 $9.42 $32.00 $289.07* PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CAS11 PETTY CASH PETTY CASH PETTY CASH Over /under 042498 MEETING EXPENSE 042498 MEETING EXPENSE 042498 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 042498 GENERAL SUPPLIES 042498 TELEPHONE 042498 POSTAGE 042498 PRINTING 042498 MEETING EXPENSE 042498 GENERAL SUPPLIES 042498 MEETING EXPENSE 042498 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 042498 GENERAL SUPPLIES 042498 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 042498 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 042498 MEETING EXPENSE 042498 GENERAL SUPPLIEES 042498 POSTAGE 042498 GENERAL SUPPLIES 042498 GENERAL SUPPLIES 042498 GENERAL SUPPLIES 042498 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 042498 188697 05/04/98 $295.00 PGI FULLFILLMENT INC. Service sticker 125610 GENERAL FD PRO CASH OVER AND CITY COUNCIL MEETING EXPENS ADMINISTRATION MEETING EXPENS ADMINISTRATION MILEAGE ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLI FINANCE TELEPHONE FINANCE POSTAGE ELECTION PRINTING ASSESSING MEETING EXPENS ASSESSING GENERAL SUPPLI ENGINEERING GE MEETING EXPENS TRAINING MILEAGE ST LIGHTING OR GENERAL SUPPLI FIRE DEPT. GEN DUES & SUBSCRI PUBLIC HEALTH PHOTO SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS MEETING EXPENS CENT SVC GENER GENERAL SUPPLI EQUIPMENT OPER POSTAGE. ADAPTIVE RECRE GENERAL SUPPLI GENERAL TURF C GENERAL SUPPLI BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI GENERAL(BILLIN CONF & SCHOOLS EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 2960 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 01- MAY -1998 (11:12) page 21 CHECK NO ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM <*> $295.00* 188699 05/04/98 $68.49 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 374826 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/04/98 $68.49 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 374827 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/04/98 - $24.55 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 3174161 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/04/98 -$4.00 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 3174492 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/04/98 - $11.91- PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 3174493 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/04/98 $48.55 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 380769 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 05/04/98 $48.55 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 380770 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 05/04/98 $253.33 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 380771 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD LIQU 05/04/98 $1,231.13 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 380772 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/04/98 $806.10 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 380773 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/04/98 $5,316.95 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 380774 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/04/98 $48.55 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 380775 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 05/04/98 $434.98 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 380776 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/04/98 $3,019.18 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 380777 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/04/98 $1,387.45 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 382812 YORK SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/04/98 $2,587.40 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 382813 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/04/98 $437.50 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 382814 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 05/04/98 $813.50 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LI 382815 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD LIQU 05/04/98 $1,801.18 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 382816 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/04/98 $447.50 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 382817 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE < *> $18,778.37* 188700 05/04/98 $63.90 PHYSICIANS' DESK REFEREN Book 0321 FIRE DEPT. GEN BOOKS & PAMPHL 1465 05/04/98 $51.90 PHYSICIANS' DESK REFEREN Book 032198 FIRE DEPT. GEN BOOKS & PAMPHL < *> $115.80* 188701 05/04/98 $124.67 Pinnacle Distributing COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 970640 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 05/04/98 $556.51 Pinnacle Distributing COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 970683 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 05/04/98 $268.66 Pinnacle Distributing COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 970738 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 05/04/98 $345.42 Pinnacle Distributing COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 970762 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 05/04/98 $99.95 Pinnacle Distributing COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 970781 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 05/04/98 $75.50 Pinnacle Distributing COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 970782 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 05/04/98 $256.25 Pinnacle Distributing COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 970783 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 05/04/98 $479.75 Pinnacle Distributing COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 990826 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 05/04/98 $342.92 Pinnacle Distributing COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 990865 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 05/04/98 $364.61 Pinnacle Distributing COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 990885 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 05/04/98 $102.95 Pinnacle Distributing COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 990925 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $3,017.19* 188702 05/04/98 $1,452.00 PIPE SERVICES CORP Storm sewer televisin 980019 SEWER TREATMEN PROF SERVICES 3582 < *> $1,452.00* 188703 05/04/98 $50.00 Play Your Mark Inc COST OF GOODS - PRO S 1553 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 1757 < *> $50.00* 188704 05/04/98 $70.22 Polo Ralph Lauren Corpor COST OF GOODS - PRO S 671672 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 8826 < *> $70.22* 188705 05/04/98 $100.24 Polo Ralph Lauren WW Gol COST OF GOODS - PRO S 07305028 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 8826 < *> $100.24* 188706 05/04/98 $5,000.00 POSTMASTER Postage 042098 CENT SVC GENER POSTAGE < *> $5,000.00* COUNCIL CHEF.. REGISTER 01- , -..-LY -1998 (11:12) 22 page CHECK NO -- - - - - -- DATE -----------------------------------------Y;------------------------------------------------------------------------ CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 188707 05/04/98 $16,868.81 Precision Tree company, Tree trimmin g #6 TREE TRIMMING EQUIP REPLACEM 05/04/98 $143.78 Precision Tree Company, Tree trimming 042498 TREES 3 YEAR CIP < *> $17,012.59* 188708 05/04/98 $292.02 PRECISION TURF & CHEMICA Repair handles 11151 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 3691 < *> $292.02* 188709 05/04/98 $310.00 Presthus, John P. S ball check reimbur.s 043.498 EDINA ATHLETIC REGISTRATION F < *> $310.00* 188711 05/04/98 - $24.44 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 84868 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 05/04/98 $453.19 PRIOR WINE COMPANY - COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 98460 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/04/98 $81.40 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 98461 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 05/04/98 $1,440.37 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 98467 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/04/98 $110.72 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 98468 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 05/04/98 $1,951.06 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 98474 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/04/98 $132.90 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 98475 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 05/04/98 - $10.31 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 85217 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 05/04/98 - $27.56 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 85221 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/04/98 $166.95 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 01655 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/04/98 $1,034.14 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 01658 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/04/98 $78.45 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 01659 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 05/04/98 $175.90 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 01664 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/04/98 $1,521.76 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 01667 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/04/98 $64.05 PRIOR WINE COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 01668 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $7,148.58* 188712 05/04/98 $51.00 Raim, Peter Class refund 042298 ART CNTR PROG REGISTRATION F < *> $51.00* 188713 05/04/98 $449.12 RED WING SHOES Boots 00950 BUILDING MAINT SAFETY EQUIPME 1900 < *> $449.12* 188714 05/04/98 $37.48 Rental Center & Power To TOOLS 87041 BUILDING MAINT TOOLS 3145 < *> $37.48* 188735 .05/04/98 $6,901.50 RINK SYSTEMS INC Arena construction 3 PKBOND CIP EQUIP REPLACEM < *> $6,901.50* 188716 05/04/98 $6.23 Ritz Camera Film processing 3750148 SIDEWALK DEWEY CIP 3502 05/04/98 $6.23 Ritz Camera Film processing 3750148 SAN.SEWER CIP 05/04/98 $127.61 Ritz Camera Radios 235382 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 3355 05/04/98 $95.84 Ritz Camera Auto dialer 235746 BUILDINGS GENERAL SUPPLI 3579 < *> $235.91* 188717 05/04/98 $2,000.00 RMR Services Inc Meter reading 980149 METER READING PROF SERVICES 3663 < *> $2,000.00* 188718 05/04/98 $41.27 ROBERT B. HILL Salt 42785 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 1468 < *> $41.27* 18873.9 05/04/98 $75.98 Robert Scott - David Bro COST OF GOODS - PRO S 56888 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 8824 < *> $75.98* 188720 05/04/98 $496.00 Roofmasters Inc Roof repairs 4980511 POOL TRACK GRE CONTR REPAIRS 3122 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER O1- MAY -1998 (11:12) page 23 CHECK NO ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM <*> $496.00* 188721 05/04/98 $74.65 ROSLAND, KENNETH MEETING EXPENSE 042798 ADMINISTRATION MEETING EXPENS < *> $74.65* 188722 05/04/98 $57.00 ROTO ROOTER SERV. Plumbing repair 9820233 POOL TRACK GRE PROF SERVICES < *> $57.00* 188723 05/04/98 $100.00 ROYAL SIL -O -ETS Perform Edinborough 051498 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $100.00* 188724 05/04/98 $20.00 Sander, Shirley Refund aqua fitness 041498 ADAPTIVE RECRE GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $20.00* 188725 05/04/98 $90.00 Sarau, Marie AC service 041798 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $90.00* 188726 05/04/98 $354.99 SEH Sewer monitoring 46670 SEWER TREATMEN PROF SERVICES• 3677 < *> $354.99* 188727 05/04/98 $6,646.45 SGN Arch 022898 PKBOND CIP EQUIP REPLACEM < *> $6,646.45* 188728 05/04/98 $37.70 SHAUGHNESY, SANDRA D Art work sold 041698 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $37.70* 188729 05/04/98 $237.75 SHERWIN WILLIAMS Paint, brushes 17392 POOL TRACK GRE GENERAL SUPPLI 1829 05/04/98 - $120.56 SHERWIN WILLIAMS GENERAL SUPPLIES CM24893 POOL TRACK GRE GENERAL SUPPLI 05/04/98 $106.55 SHERWIN WILLIAMS Sign shop 26269 STREET NAME SI PAINT 3500 05/04/98 $31.74 SHERWIN WILLIAMS Sign shop 46147 STREET NAME SI GENERAL SUPPLI 3640 < *> $255.48* 188730 05/04/98 $74.55 Shutters 'n Shades REPAIR PARTS 041698 RANGE REPAIR PARTS 3600 < *> $74.55* 188731 05/04/98 $75.93 SIMS SECURITY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 8568674 POOL TRACK GRE PROF SERVICES 05/04/98 $75.93 SIMS SECURITY Guard 8581680 POOL TRACK GRE PROF SERVICES < *> $151.86* 188732 05/04/98 $52.60 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 59675 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 05/04/98 $728.00 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 82853 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 05/04/98 $1,809.20 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 82857 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 05/04/98 $47.00 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 82858 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 05/04/98 $131.25 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 92978 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 05/04/98 $257.00 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 83003 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 05/04/98 $1,753.30 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLI) BE 83056 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 05/04/98 $19.40 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBU'T'ORS I COST OF GOODS SOI,D MI 83057 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 05/04/98 $4,061.15 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 83059 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 05/04/98 $119.00 SOUTHSIDE DISTRIBUTORS I COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 83060 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX < *> $8,977.90* 188733 05/04/98 $1,514.88 SPALDING COST OF GOODS - PRO S 51104576 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 9484 05/04/98 $310.80 SPALDING COST OF GOODS - PRO S 51092872 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 9484 < *> $1,825.68* COUNCIL CHEF.. REGISTER O1- .-..,Y -1998 (11:12) page 24 CHECK NO ------------------------------------------------------------------Y----------------------------------------------------------------- DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 188734 05/04/98 $208.90 SPECTRUM Commercial Sery Display holder 322332 PRO SHOP GENERAL SUPPLI 3449 < *> $208.90* 188735 05/04/98 $196.00 Spooner, Anne AC services 041798 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $196.00* 188736 05/04/98 $10,366.19 SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED Advisory service 040998 TRAINING FACIL PROF SERVICES < *> $10,366.19* 188737 05/04/98 $155.21 SPS CH electrical 2894621 CITY HALL GENE REPAIR PARTS 3240 05/04/98 - $166.30 SPS Credit 2897992 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 3467 05/04/98 $10.91 SPS REPAIR PARTS 2897993 CITY HALL GENE REPAIR PARTS 3248 05/04/98 $47.07 SPS Braemar electrical 2897994 CLUB HOUSE GENERAL SUPPLI 3248 05/04/98 $159.94 SPS REPAIR PARTS 2899000 CLUB HOUSE REPAIR PARTS 3248 < *> $206.83* 188738 05/04/98 $2,215.00 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC Prof eng sry 102171 TH 62 /FRANCE CIP < *> $2,215.00* 188739 05/04/98 $100.00 St Paul Czechoslavakian Perform Edinborough 053198 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $100.00* 188740 05/04/98 $38.80 Standard Water Control S Job cenceled 98001268 GENERAL FD PRO BUILDING PERMI < *> $38.80* 188741 05/04/98 $44.82 STEPP MFG CO INC REPAIR PARTS 14554 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3465 05/04/98 $590.01 STEPP MFG CO INC Shop 14604 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3188 < *> $634.83* 188742 05/04/98 $1,364.27 STREICHERS AMMUNITION 471641 POLICE DEPT. G AMMUNITION 3418 05/04/98 $1,364.27 STREICHERS AMMUNITION 465571 POLICE DEPT. G AMMUNITION 3418 05/04/98 $50.44 STREICHERS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 497531 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP MAINT 3421 05/04/98 $79.82 STREICHERS GENERAL SUPPLIES 498931 POLICE DEPT. G GENERAL SUPPLI 3173 05/04/98 $205.01 STREICHERS AMMUNITION 470781 POLICE DEPT. G AMMUNITION 2457 < *> $3,063.81* 188743 05/04/98 $53.27 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET Shop 22250 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3184 05/04/98 - $23.43 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET Credit C229363 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3576 05/04/98 $737.56 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET REPAIR PARTS 23258 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3508 05/04/98 $333.28 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET Shop 23266 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3509 05/04/98 $28.02 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET Shop 23298 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3510 05/04/98 $5.60 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET Shop 23359 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3511 05/04/98 $68.53 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET Shop 23391 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3512 05/04/98 $3.29 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET Shop 23507 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3521 < *> $1,206.12* 188744 05/04/98 $50.00 SUNDIN, ROSALIE AC service 041798 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES 05/04/98 05/04/98 $57.50 SUNDIN, ROSALIE AC service 042498 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES $33.30 SUNDIN, ROSALIE CRAFT SUPPLIES 042498 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES < *> $140.80* 188745 05/04/98 $24.56 SuperAmerica Gas 041698 EQUIPMENT OPER LUBRICANTS 3563 < *> $24.56* 188746 05/04/98 $40.57 TARGET GENERAL SUPPLIES 70270 CLUB HOUSE GENERAL SUPPLI COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 01- MAY -1998 (11:12) page 25 CHECK NO ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 188746 05/04/98 $13.73 TARGET GENERAL SUPPLIES 14077 PRO SHOP GENERAL SUPPLI 3200 05/04/98 $93.13 TARGET GENERAL SUPPLIES 14392 RANGE GENERAL SUPPLI 3445 < *> $147.43* 188747 05/04/98 $4,711.00 TEE SHOT MARKETING Brooms motorized 164345 GOLF PROG MACH. & EQUIP 2673 < *> $4,711.00* 188748 05/04/98 $10.70 TELEPHONE ANSWERING CENT Telephone answer 041698 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $10.70* 188749 05/04/98 $120.40 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO Shop 5618900 EQUIPMENT OPER GENERAL SUPPLI 3171 05/04/98 $316.66 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO Shop 5707900 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 3306 < *> $437.06* 188750 05/04/98 $530.00 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 130491 CLUB HOUSE CST OF GDS BEE 05/04/98 $1,706.15 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 130533 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 05/04/98 $32.95 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 130534 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 05/04/98 $2,835.20 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 131062 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 05/04/98 $59.90 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMP COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 131063 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE < *> $5,164.20* 188751 05/04/98 $2,309.12 TITLEIST COST OF GOODS - PRO S 1396309 PRO SHOP COST OF GDS -PR 8830 < *> $2,309.12* 188752 05/04/98 $17,016.20 TKDA Engineers, Architec Prof eng sry 039599 GENERAL(BILLIN PROF SERVICES < *> $17,016.20* 188753 05/04/98 $15.42 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPL Welding supplies 170314 DISTRIBUTION WELDING SUPPLI 3320 05/04/98 $4.47 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPL Sign shop 170971 STREET NAME SI GENERAL SUPPLI 3374 < *> $19.89* 188754 05/04/98 $793.49 TRACY /TRIPP FUELS GASOLINE 47324 MAINT OF COURS GASOLINE < *> $793.49* 188755 05/04/98 $142.96 TRI STATE BOBCAT REPAIR PARTS 090921 MAINT OF COURS REPAIR PARTS 3214 < *> $142.96* 188756 05/04/98 $226.50 TRIARCO ARTS & CRAFT CRAFT SUPPLIES 142434 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES 2297 < *> $226.50* 188757 05/04/98 $340.00 Twin Cities Service Cent Radio service 8568 EQUIPMENT OPER RADIO SERVICE 3489 < *> $340.00* 188758 05/04/98 $463.83 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO Shop 049934 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 3666 < *> $463.83* 188759 05/04/98 $85.78 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO Oxygen 418500 FIRE DEPT. GEN FIRST AID SUPP 1111 < *> $85.78* 188760 05/04/98 $90.00 TWIN CITY ROSE SOCIETY Supplies fertilizer 042798 MAINT OF COURS COURSE BEAUTIF < *> - $90.00* 188761 05/04/98 $958.50 TWIN CITY SEED CO. Grass seed for Braema 93 FIELD MAINTENA SEED 3373 05/04/98 $479.25 TWIN CITY SEED CO. Grass seed for Braema 96 FIELD MAINTENA SEED 3378 < *> $1,437.75* COUNCIL CHE(.., REGISTER 01 -r-nY -1998 (11:12) page 26 CHECK NO ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 188762 05/04/98 $153.00 TWIN CITY WATER CLINIC Water analysis 4212 DISTRIBUTION PROF SERVICES ------------- 3648 < *> $153.00* 188763 05/04/98 $1,072.20 U.S. CAVALRY UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 3578828 POLICE DEPT. G UNIF ALLOW 2463 < *> $1,072.20* 188764 05/04/98 $336.71 U.S. Filter /Waterpro Check valve part 407387 DTSTRTAUTTON - REPAIR PARTS 3675 < *> $336.71* 188765 05/04/98 $188.00 UHL CO April service 81171 PW BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 3151 < *> $188.00* 188766 05/04/98 $46.02 ULLRICH, CINDY MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 042798 ED ADMINISTRAT MILEAGE < *> $46.02* 188767 05/04/98 $489.53 UNITED AGRI PRODUCTS FERTILIZER 0021373 CENTENNIAL LAK FERTILIZER 3773 < *> $489.53* 188768 05/04/98 $331.22 United Electric AC electric 33390900 ART CENTER BLD GENERAL SUPPLI 2027 05/04/98 $27.74 United Electric Freight charge 33480990 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 05/04/98 $13.87 United Electric Freight charges 33481100 GENERAL MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 1901 05/04/98 $234.30 United Electric Ramp electric 33336900 PARKING RAMP GENERAL SUPPLI 3235 < *> $607.13* 188769 05/04/98 $34.07 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Plantings 35403 TREES & MAINTE PLANT &.TREES 3107 < *> $34.07* 188770 05/04/98 $65.00 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Workshop 12823 ED ADMINISTRAT CONF &..SCHOOLS 2526 < *> $65.00* 188771 05/04/98 $78.00 UNL Center for Leadershi CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 041698 ENGINEERING GE CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $78.00* 188772 05/04/98 $357.74 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 050498 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE 05/04/98 $138.55 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 050498 SKATING & HOCK TELEPHONE 05/04/98 $522.62 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 050498 BUILDING MAINT TELEPHONE 05/04/98 $209.36 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 050498 GOLF DOME TELEPHONE 05/04/98 $481.00 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS ADVERTISING OTHER 050498 ED ADMINISTRAT ADVERT OTHER 05/04/98 $918.86 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 050498 ED ADMINISTRAT TELEPHONE < *> $2,628.13* 188773 05/04/98 $8.87 US WEST COMMUNICATIONS Logis TI D0869309 CENT SVC GENER TELEPHONE < *> $8.87* 188774 05/04/98 $37.28 VALLIERE, JOHN Glass replacement 042298 PRO SHOP GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $37.28* 1nn77" n n4 / ,) n $75. 2(; VAN t'AFIRR CO. r ;I ?NfRAI. 1:I IIII.IRf: Ilr,rn rI +IIJ. ra ?NI ?R AI. .. ^•IIhli,f 7r,')n • ' 75. fir,• 188776 05/04/98 $697.58 VESSCO Chlorine scale 16082 WATER TREATMEN GENERAL SUPPLI 3653 05/04/98 $2,811.60 VESSCO Regulator 16003 WATER TREATMEN GENERAL SUPPLI 3092 < *> $3,509.18* 188777 05/04/98 $167.10 Viking Industrial Center Safety items 25347- MAINT OF COURS GENERAL SUPPLI 3403 COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 01- MAY -1998 (11:12) page 27 CHECK NO ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM < *> $167.10* 188778 05/04/98 $103.00 VINTAGE ONE WINES COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 2394 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/04/98 $308.00 VINTAGE ONE WINS. ", COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 2109 YORK SELLING CST OF (N) WINE < *> $411.00* 188779 05/04/98 $489.90 Voss Lighting REPAIR PARTS 2015929 CLUB HOUSE REPAIR PARTS 3154 05/04/98 $78.60 Voss Lighting Electrical supplies 20158020 ST LIGHTING OR GENERAL SUPPLI 3113 < *> $568.50* 188780 05/04/98 $1,648.00 W.E. Nelson Stucco Co BUILDINGS 041798 ART CNTR FROG BUILDINGS 3392 < *> $1,648.00* 188781 05/04/98 $100.00 WALBRIDGE, DAVID Perform Edinborough 051298 ED ADMINISTRAT PRO SVC OTHER < *> $100.00* 188782 05/04/98 $7,229.47 WALDOR PUMP & EQUIP Pump repair 47072 LIFT STATION M CONTR REPAIRS 3228 < *> $7,229.47* 188783 05/04/98 $80.00 WARNING LITES OF MINNESO Traffic school 011880 STREET NAME SI GENERAL SUPPLI 2507 < *> $80.00* 188784 05/04/98 $23.00 WELLS, GARY Class C operators lic 041498 DISTRIBUTION LIC & PERMITS < *> $23.00* 188785 05/04/98 $522.00 WENDORF, HAROLD AC service 041798 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES 05/04/98 $44.00 WENDORF, HAROLD CRAFT SUPPLIES 041798 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES < *> $566.00* 188786 05/04/98 $612.00 WENZEL, KENNETH AC service 041798 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $612.00* 188787 05/04/98 $643.08 WEST WELD SUPPLY CO. Shop 14057 EQUIPMENT OPER WELDING SUPPLI 2844 05/04/98 $29.69 WEST WELD SUPPLY CO. Gauge 14287 FIRE DEPT. GEN GENERAL SUPPLI 3181 05/04/98 $339.71 WEST WELD SUPPLY CO. ACCESSORIES 14288 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 3183 05/04/98 $401.74 WEST WELD SUPPLY CO. Tools 14553 PUMP & LIFT ST TOOLS 3358 < *> $1,414.22* 188788 05/04/98 $343.89 WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT ACCESSORIES 61907 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 3469 < *> $343.89* 188789 05/04/98 $602.70 WHEELER LUMBER CONSTR. IN PROGRESS 12200745 MEDIA LAB CONS CIP 3676 < *> $602.70* 188790 05/04/98 $150.00 Whole Brain Shop Refund arneson acres 042198 GENERAL FD PRO RENTAL OF PROP < *> $150.00* 188791 05/04/98 $96.00 WICKER, CYD AC service 041798 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $96.00* 188792 05/04/98 $425.37 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4244 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/04/98 $425.24 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4245 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/04/98 $1,024.24 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4239 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/04/98 $80.00 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4298 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/04/98 $526.65 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4437 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE COUNCIL CHEC... REGISTER 01 -....f -1998 (11:12) page 28 CHECK NO ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 188792 05/04/98 $132.24 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 4457 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $2,613.74* 188793 05/04/98 $494.75 Wizardly Teleproductions Prof sery Q8032EDI GENERAL(BILLIN PROF SERVICES < *> $494.75* 188794 05/04/98 $279.00 Wolahan, Janet AC service 041798 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $279.00* 188795 05/04/98 $30.00 Women in Leisure Inc Managing todays youth 030398 PARK ADMIN. CONF & SCHOOLS 3591 < *> $30.00* 188796 05/04/98 $446.00 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 70685 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/04/98 $205.00 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 70686 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GD WINE 05/04/98 $221.00 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 70698 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/04/98 $848.00 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 70933 YORK SELLING CST OF GD WINE 05/04/98 $643.38 WORLD CLASS WINES INC COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 70935 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $2,363.38* 188797 05/04/98 $60.00 Young, Mary Refund patron card 042498 GOLF PROG MEMBERSHIPS < *> $60.00* 188798 05/04/98 $793.43 Zahl Equipment Co Island form 0070743 SNOW & ICE REM GENERAL SUPPLI 2512 < *> $793.43* 188799 05/04/98 $67.83 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE Drugs 54053323 CITY HALL GENE GENERAL SUPPLI 3637 < *> $67.83* 188800 05/04/98 $73.52 ZIEGLER INC REPAIR PARTS PC000118 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3505 05/04/98 $6.24 ZIEGLER INC Shop PC000118 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3507 < *> $79.76* 188801 05/04/98 $144.00 ZINN, BOBO AC service 041798 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES 05/04/98 $35.59 ZINN, BOBO CRAFT SUPPLIES 041798 ART CENTER ADM CRAFT SUPPLIES < *> $179.59* 188802 05/04/98 $154.99 LESCO SERVICE CENTER Forestry supplies 1P71F2 TREES & MAINTE TOOLS 3115 < *> $154.99* 188803 05/04/98 $251.60 Lighting Printing GENERAL SUPPLIES 210295 I -494 COMMISSI GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $251.60* 188804 05/04/98 $133.25 LUNDGREN, BARBARA Art work sold 041698 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $133.25* 188805 05/04/98 $50.00 M.I.A.M.A. Class registration 042298 ED ADMINISTRAT CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $50.00* 188806 05/04/98 $210.00 MAAO CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 042298 ASSESSING CONF & SCHOOLS < *> $210.00* 188807 05/04/98 $123.79 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. Street dept 29803432 EQUIPMENT OPER REPAIR PARTS 3469 < *> $123.79* 188808 05/04/98 $15.00 MACA ACO general supplies 041798 ANIMAL CONTROL GENERAL SUPPLI COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER 01- MAY -1998 (11:12) page 29 CHECK NO DATE 'CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM ------------------- ,------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <*> $15.00* 188809 05/04/98 $520.00 MARGROM SKOGLUND WINE IM COST OF GOODS SOLD WI 10004228 VERNON SELLING CST OF GD WINE < *> $520.00* 188812 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 188813 05/04/98 188814 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 05/04/98 168815 05/04/98 188816 05/04/98 188817 05/04/98 188818 05/04/98 < *> $1,040.20 $25.60 $729.30 $2,939.96 $46.00 $44.25 $1,085.75 $40.25 $36.30 $1,088.00 $1,330.95 $55.95 $690.80 $2,064.14 $16.50 $36.30 $752.25 $17.00 $36.30 $52.95 $1,575.31 $14.80 $306.00, $1,346.65 $3,849.80 $45.90 $25.50 $36.30 $19,329.01* MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII. SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES MARK VII SALES $34.78 MATHISON CO, THE $34.78* $963.18 MCCAREN DESIGN $962.11 MCCAREN DESIGN $991.93 MCCAREN DESIGN $63.25 MCCAREN DESIGN $2,980.47* COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 758944 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 758945 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 759014 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 761433 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 761434 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 761438 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 761439 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 761440 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 761441 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 761442 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 761527 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 761528 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 761599 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 761621 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 761622 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 761624 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 763960 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 763981 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 763984 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 763996 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 763997 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 763998 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 763999 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 764215 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 764236 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 764237 COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 764238 COST OF GOODS SOLD BE 764239 COST OF GOODS SOLD 115716 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUB 6663 Plants 6665 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUB 6666 Plants 6672 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX 50T11 ST SELLIN CST OF GDS MIX VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS BEE VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE 50TH ST SELLIN CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX YORK SELLING CST OF GDS BEE ART SUPPLY GIF COST OF GD SOL 3277 POOL TRACK GRE TREES FLWR SHR 2828 POOL TRACK GRE TREES FLWR SHR 2891 POOL TRACK GRE TREES FLWR SHR POOL TRACK GRE TREES FLWR SHR 3221 $90.00 MCGARVEY /SUPERIOR COFFEE COST OF GOODS SOLD 7602172 GRILL COST OF GD SOL 1389 $90.00* $21,097.00 McKay's Coon Rapids Chry EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 15228 POLICE DEPT. G EQUIP REPLACEM 2461 $21,097.00* $89.99 MCKENZIE, TOM UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 042098 POLICE DEPT. G UNIF ALLOW $89.99* $26.00 MCKISSON, SHARON Art work sold 041698 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER $26.00* COUNCIL CHEt-., REGISTER 01 -1-iNY -1998 (11:12) page 30 CHECK NO DATE -------------------------- CHECK AMOUNT ------ - - - - -- VENDOR --------- DESCRIPTION INVOICE- PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM 188819 05/04/98 $862.41 MCNEILUS STEEL - - - - -- - - - -- GENERAL SUPPLIES 0145802 ------------------------------------ SNOW &'ICE REM GENERAL SUPPLI 3172 < *> $862.41* 188820 05/04/98 $41,246.00 MEDICA HOSPITALIZATION 19812110 CENT SVC GENER HOSPITALIZATIO < *> $41,246.00* 188821 05/04/98 $414.00 Medtox Fee for service 03987911 CENT SVC GENER ADVERT PERSONL < *> $414.00* 188822 05/04/98 05/04/98 $4.25 MENARDS ACCT #35170288 Garden fabric 23275 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI 3415 05/04/98 $40.93 $45.77 MENARDS ACCT #35170288 MENARDS Pothole patch 23293 POOL TRACK GRE GENERAL SUPPLI 3493 ACCT 435170288 Pump 23399 CENTENNIAL LAK GENERAL SUPPLI < *> $90.95* 188823 05/04/98 $34.70 MENARDS * ACCT 430240251 REPAIR PARTS 18938 RICHARDS MAINT REPAIR PARTS 3210 < *> $34.70* 188824 05/04/98 05/04/98 $280.09 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 47792 BUILDING MAINT GENERAL SUPPLI 2929 05/04/98 $995.77 $823.99 MERIT SUPPLY MERIT ACCESSORIES 47840 EQUIPMENT OPER ACCESSORIES 2847 05/04/98 $316.14. SUPPLY MERIT.SUPPLY CLEANING SUPPLIES 47845 ARENA BLDG /GRO CLEANING SUPPL 3268 05/04/98 $347.01 MERIT CLEANING SUPPLIES. 47869 POOL TRACK GRE CLEANING SUPPL 3126 05/04/98 $990.45 SUPPLY MERIT ACCESSORIES 47891 EQUIPMENT.OPER ACCESSORIES 3375 05/04/98 $458.16 SUPPLY MERIT SUPPLY Bags Cleaning supplies 47906 47921 STREET REVOLVI POOL TRACK GENERAL SUPPLI 3239 05/04/98 $83.07 MERIT SUPPLY Cleaning 47922 GRE GRILL CLEANING SUPPL CLEANING SUPPL 3495 3447 05/04/98 $200.22 MERIT SUPPLY Sign shop supplies 47937 STREET NAME SI GENERAL SUPPLI 3565 05/04/98 $944.86 MERIT SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 47977 CLUB HOUSE GENERAL SUPPLI 3446 < *> $5,439.76* 188825 05/04/98 $384.35 MESSERLI &.KRAMER Collect fees 0423 GENERAL FD PRO AMBULANCE FEES 05/04/98 $20.00 MESSERLI k KRAMER Collect fee 042398 GENERAL FD PRO AMBULANCE FEES < *> $404:35* 188826 05/04/98 05/04/98 $74.18 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY Tennis court supplier.. 25817 PATHS & HARD S GENERAL SUPPLI 3106 05/04/`18 $733.84 $212.73 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY METRO Ballfield supplies 25950. FIELD MAINTENA GENERAL SUPPLI 3246 < *> $1,020.75* AT111.,ETrC t;UPPLY Tennin ccwrt, parts 2r ;26 i PATHS !r HARD S GENERAL SUPPLI 3577 188827 05/04/98 $51.03 Metro Cash Register Syst Ribbon register 41756 PRO SHOP GENERAL SUPPLI 3450 < *> $51.03* 188828 05/04/98 $16.20 METZ BAKING CO COST OF GOODS SOLD 144734 VANVALKENBURG COST OF GD SOL 3684 < *> $16.20* 188829 05/04/98 $204.00 MEUWISSEN, MARY AC service 041798 ART CENTER ADM PROF SERVICES < *> $204.00* 188830 05/04/98 $369.71 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP Concrete dumping 8103MB BUILDING MAINT RUBBISH REMOVA 05/04/98 $13.79 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP Concrete disposal 8131MB BUILDING MAINT RUBBISH REMOVA 3474 < *> $383.50* 188831 05/04/98 $144.90 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI 'COCA-COLA COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 65145052 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 05/04/98 $223.60 MIDWEST BOTTLI COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 62829070 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 05/04/98 $179.90 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 651491.04 VERNON SELLING CST OF GDS MIX 05/04/98 $82.55 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLI COST OF GOODS SOLD MI 60030150 YORK SELLING CST OF GDS MIX COUNCIL CHECK REGISTER O1- MAY -1998 (11:12) page 31 CHECK NO ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DATE CHECK AMOUNT VENDOR DESCRIPTION INVOICE PROGRAM OBJECT PO NUM <*> $630.95* 188832 05/04/98 $133.95 MIDWEST REFRESHMENTS INC COST OF GOODS SOLD. 162802 FRED RICHARDS COST OF GD SOL 1390 < *> $133.95* 188833 05/04/98 $1,149.23 Mikkelson -Wulff Const ADA reimburse 041698 CONTINGENCIES PROF SERVICES < *> $1,149.23* 188834 05/04/98 $111.80 Mill City Printworks Art work sold 041698 ART CNTR PROG SALES OTHER < *> $111.80* 188835 05/04/98 $428.24 MILLIPORE Lab supplies 2050425 LABORATORY GENERAL SUPPLI 3574 < *> $428.24* $889,822.52* COUNCIL CHECK SUMMARY O1- MAY -1998 (11:14) page 1 FUND - -------------------------------------- # 10 GENERAL FUND - - - - - -- ________________________ ------------------------------------------------- $361,489.34 - - - -- FUND # 12 COMMUNICATIONS $4,054.13 FUND # 15 WORKING CAPITAL $55,194.08 FUND # 23 ART CENTER $16,639.66 FUND # 25 GOLF DOME FUND $209.36 FUND # 26 SWIMMING POOL FUND $4,469.42 FUND # 27 GOLF COURSE FUND $71,141.99 FUND # 28 ICE ARENA FUND $1,895.29 FUND # 30 EDINBOROUGH /CENTENNIAL LAK $14,803.61 FUND # 40 UTILITY FUND $54,594.05 FUND # 41 STORM SEWER UTILITY FUND $776.40 FUND # 50 LIQUOR DISPENSARY FUND $163,353.13 FUND # 60 CONSTRUCTION FUND $3,472.51 FUND # 61 PARK BOND FUND $133,550.95 FUND # 73 I -494 COMMISSION $4,178.60 $889,822.52* — — ...a —v.ry i:a.a i.lra . 11"110G1 µuUUL TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council Kenneth E.' Rosland, City Manager FROM: Jerry Gilligan DATE: May 1, 1998 RE: City Council Vote Required to Approve Maple Road Sidewalks At the Council meeting on April 201h a question arose whether a 3 15ths or 4 /5ths vote of the City Council is required to approve the installation of sidewalks on Maple Road. Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 sets forth the procedures and requirements to be followed by the City for public improvements if all or a portion of the cost of the improvement is to be assessed against benefitted properties. Section 429.031 requires the improvement to be approved following a public hearing by a vote of 4 /5ths of all members of the City Council, unless the improvement has been petitioned for by the owners of not less than 35% in frontage of the real property abutrnQ �:?+: &,.— ktr°Ptsmatned in the petition as the location of the improvement, in which case a 3 /5ths vote is required. I have reviewed with City staff the petition submitted for the Maple Road sidewalks and determined the petition does not meet the 35% frontage requirement. Therefore, a 4 /5ths vote of the City Council is required to approve the installation of sidewalks on Maple Road. The petition references sidewalks being installed on only one side of the street, while the proposal considered by the Council provides for sidewalks on both sides of the street. Therefore, even if the 35% frontage requirement was satisfied, the petition is probably not legally sufficient to only require a 3 /5ths vote of the Council to approve the sidewalks as presently proposed. EDINA PARK BOARD 7:30 p.m. APRIL 14, 1998 MEMBERS PRESENT: Andy Herring, David Crowther, Tom White, Andrew Montgomery, Phyllis Kohler, Bill Jenkins, John Dovolis, Jean Rydell, Beth Hall, David Fredlund MEMBERS ABSENT: Becky Bennett STAFF PRESENT: John Keprios, Ed MacHolda, Janet Canton OTHERS PRESENT: Marjorie Ruedy, Alyce Lees, David Lees, Ron Sharpe, Mike Damman, Mike Hall, Tom Mahler, Barb Mahler, David O'Halloran, Fred Nelson, Pat Nelson, Kathryn Peterson, Anne Hall, Robb Leer, Gerry Gordon, Doug Nessan, Don Blue, Scott Dunlop, Jay Gould, Pete Kenefick, Dale Nelson, John Clifford, Marvin Goldstein, Bob Donahue, Charles Feige, Josh Arnold, Scott Canakes I. APPROVAL OF THE MARCH 10, 1998 PARK BOARD MINUTES Jean Rydell MOVED TO APPROVE THE MARCH 10, 1998 PARK BOARD MINUTES. Beth Hall SECONDED THE MOTION. MINUTES APPROVED. II. WOODDALE PARK COMFORT STATION Mr. Keprios explained that on March 22, he received a petition requesting that we look at some of the issues regarding the comfort station at Wooddale Park. Therefore, he felt he should hold a neighborhood meeting so he could receive input and see how the neighborhood felt as a whole and attempt to resolve any concerns or clear up any misunderstandings. He indicated that 573 notices were sent to the Wooddale Park neighborhood inviting them to attend a meeting. There were 17 people from the neighborhood who attended the meeting in addition to the architect, Jerry Drevlow from the Edina Police Department and Dave Crowther. Mr. Keprios indicated that there was some good discussion and there were some strong opinions on both sides of the issue. He pointed out that the number one issue was whether or not we even need a restroom. Some felt strongly the park needed them and others felt the park did not need them. Some of the people also indicated that they felt the park needed a restroom, however, they would like to see it placed in a different location. Mr. Keprios showed everyone what the comfort station would look like and explained the design. He noted that the function of the building is to provide a restroom for meniboys and women/girls as well as have a storage area with a floor mop sink to maintain the facility. He indicated that he was asked the question is there a formula used to determine which parks should get a restroom. He pointed out that there is no formula but rather the need is determined by the fact that we have scheduled youth games at the park. Mr. Keprios explained that he was asked who came up with the current location and he stated that it was the architect and himself. He indicated he felt he had learned a lot from previous meetings with the neighborhood regarding the basketball court issue for this same area. He noted that it was very clear to him that the open grassy area is very precious space that the residents wanted to see that left open. Therefore, this seemed to be the most logical place because it didn't take away any open play space and would be close to both the ball field and playground area. In addition, this location keeps the children away from the traffic on 50' Street as well as the parking lot. Mr. Keprios commented that he felt there was a strong contingency that the neighbors are okay with having a restroom, however some would like to see it relocated to a different location in the park. Mr. Keprios explained that there are a few drawbacks to relocating the comfort station. It will cost an additional $16,000 to $20,000 to run new utility lines to the new location and it also takes a away from the open play space and becomes too much the focal point of the park. David Lee, resident, indicated.that he has lived three - quarters of a block from Wooddale Park for the last 30 years and his kids grew up using the park. He stated that it appears to him that for the small amount of time that baseball is played at the park, it's a big expense for a building as well as maintenance. He noted that he sees no reason to have any facilities there at all. They haven't needed one in the last 30 years and doesn't know what the difference is now. Mr. Lee also pointed out there is a restroom right across the street at Utley Park and therefore feels it's an unnecessary expenditure. Ron Sharp, resident, lives approximately two blocks from the park and really has no special interest. However, he was struck about the amount of money the city is willing to spend on this particular facility for such a small park without what he views as a real rationale. He indicated that one rationale he heard was that the baseball players and small children have been going to the bathroom behind the trees. He stated that he feels the baseball players could'walk across the street and use Utley Park if necessary. However, he does feel it would be difficult to let small children cross the street and use Utley Park. Mr. Sharp stated that for the short amount of time this facility is going to be used and given the very small nature of the park he asked staff if they have adequately considered an alternative. He indicated that he heard portable toilets mentioned once and it was said that they would be pushed over and be a constant eyesore. Mr. Sharp explained that you can build barriers so they cannot be pushed over as well as landscape them.. Again, if it's only for 8 to 10 weeks out of the year this would be a great solution because he feels there really doesn't need to be a permanent facility for that much money. 2 Barb Mahler, resident, indicated that she lives across from Wooddale Park and takes her grandchildren there all the time. She stated that she also was astounded that the City of Edina would think about spending that kind of money on such a small park for such a short period of time. She noted that kids are usually there for a short period of time and maybe for the baseball players a portable toilet could be used for the 8 weeks of scheduled games. In addition, there are a lot of homes that back right up to the park and commented that if she lived there she wouldn't want a huge toilet sitting outside of her back window. David O'Halloran, resident, indicated that he lives in one of the houses that backs right up to the park and he will see it from his back window if it is located where it has been proposed. He noted that he respects his neighbors concerns about whether the city should spend any money at all on having a facility there. Also, he respects other neighbors concerns that it would be nice to have the convenience of a facility for small children. However, he noted that his principle concern has to do with the location of the facility because of it's proximity to his immediate neighbors and himself. In addition, he noted that the design of the facility in terms of size would tend to make it the dominate feature of the park and feels that could be corrected with architectural changes. He stated that he disagrees with Mr. Keprios for he doesn't feel it would be the focal point of the park if it was relocated closer to the street, but rather feels it would be moving it away as a focal point. Mr. O'Halloran brought up the point of safety and commented that the officer who spoke at the meeting stated that if the comfort station were located closer to the parking lot it would be easier to patrol. It would also be easier to get into the facility immediately if someone were to lock themselves in. Therefore, he thinks there are many rationales for relocating the facility and not the least of which are the immediate neighbors who back up against the park. Kathryn Peterson, resident, indicated that she lives in one of the houses that backs up to the park. She stated that the design of the structure is overwhelming for the size of the park, which really addresses the whole question about need. Do we need a permanent structure and if so do we need it to be of this magnitude, because it doesn't matter where you put it in the park it's going to be the dominate feature. There is also the question of cost. Ms. Peterson pointed out that she has a daughter in traveling soccer and they play at a number of similar parks throughout the west metro area and there are very few of them with restroom facilities. Meanwhile, the ones in Edina are usually locked in the summer and that does not seem to deter the use or success of these parks. She noted that she asks the question do we need a permanent structure, because the whole question is convenience and when it comes to small children there will never be enough restroom facilities. Mike Hall, resident, indicated that he also backs up against the park. He explained that he and his wife Ann are the ones who started the petition. He stated that as they have talked to more people they have found out there are a lot of people who have used the 3 park and ball fields who would have used the restroom at Utley Park instead of going home had they known there were was a restroom there. Mr. Hall explained that when they first looked at it they thought possibly of a relocation. However, they were surprised at the number of people who have come forward since the first petition saying it doesn't make any sense and even though a portable toilet is not aesthetically pleasing it was deemed by many that it might be a better option than a permanent facility. Especially considering the brief amount of time it would be there. Mr. Hall pointed out that the pagoda is the center piece and the proximity of the comfort station to the pagoda would compete with it as well as it would be another aesthetic issue. Mr. Hall also questioned whether there really is a need for both a mens and womens restroom or could it be one unisex restroom. He noted that all of the ideas are leading to a smaller, less dominate structure in what is already a small park. Pat Nelson, resident, indicated that she would like to know why a portable toilet can't be put in by the three big evergreens. She stated that Mr. Keprios replied at the recent meeting that he receives numerous complaints when he puts in a portable toilet, however, this way it would be hidden. She also pointed out that with the current structure plan half of it is for storage and she doesn't agree that is necessary to have. Mrs. Nelson suggested that people should use the'restroom at Utley Park and the city could put in a big pedestrian crosswalk with a blinking light as well as have the police tag cars. She noted that we should make do with what we have especially if it's only for 8 weeks out of the year. Mrs. Nelson pointed out, however, that if it absolutely must go in she feels it should be closer to the parking lot and should have a different roof than the one that is shown. She also stated that if one crime takes place in that restroom and ruins one life, it is not worth it in her opinion. Mr. Keprios indicated that-he has received more phone calls on portable toilets than any other issue. If there is anything people really object to it's portable toilets even to the point where they have taken the time to call their city council members. Past experience tells him that people do not want to live next to a portable toilet. Mr. Keprios commented that he is actually quite surprised to hear that the neighborhood supports the idea of portable toilets. He explained that we are, however, limited to where they can put these facilities because they have to be able to access them, however, they can still enclose them. Mr. Fredlund indicated that there are 44 signatures listed on the petition with different points brought up. He asked that the Park Board go through each point. Point number one is the close proximity to the park and Mr. Fredlund asked if that is bad. Mr. Keprios replied that, in his professional opinion, having a permanent restroom facility next to the tot lot and picnic area is not an issue for him. It is a plus in his opinion. - The second point brought up is the aesthetics and he asked if the comfort station could be redesigned at this time. Mr. Keprios replied that it can all be done again, however, it would cost a lot more money and if the idea is to save money, that would not be a good move. 4 The third point brought up was maintenance. Mr. Keprios replied that maintenance becomes our job and we will have to continue to do our very best to keep it as clean as it needs to be. Mr. Herring asked how maintenance is handled now in which Mr. Keprios responded that we do it internally and visit the sites once a day. Mr. Montgomery asked where else are we building comfort stations in which Mr. Keprios replied they are being built at Lake Cornelia Park and Garden Park. Mr. Keprios commented that all of the new buildings will have a keyless entry system installed so that we can lock and unlock the doors from a remote location via computer. Mr. Crowther indicated that after hearing both sides speak at the meeting last week he went over to look at Wooddale Park so he could see exactly where everything is located. He noted that he heard more from the group that it would be acceptable to have a facility if it were relocated. It seemed that location was probably a bigger issue, however, some people were obviously opposed to the idea altogether. Mr. Crowther pointed out that he walked the park to get a sense of where it might be able to be relocated and none of the places seemed to make sense to him. He also noted that it certainly doesn't make any sense to locate it where we would have to spend an additional $20,000 to get utilities put in. However, now he is hearing everyone saying they are okay with portable toilets and if the new comfort station is going to cost $60,000 and we have people who are not happy with that then maybe we should put in portable toilets for now and see what happens. Mr. Fredlund asked what is invested to date with the Wooddale comfort station. Mr. Keprios replied there is close to $20,000 in utilities and a minimal amount of money invested in the foundation. He also noted that if the neighborhood is okay with portable toilets then try it for a year and see how they like it because there might be a different representation here after a year of portable toilets. Mr. Crowther asked if the utilities will be capped so we can always go back and Mr. Keprios replied that they can stay capped indefinitely. Mr. Crowther pointed out that the reason Utley Park is not viewed as a good option is because of the safety issue of crossing the street. The concern is not so much crossing at the light but crossing to the west by the baseball fields. Mr. Herring asked where the portable toilets would be put. Mr. Keprios replied he would ask the residents where they would prefer it before he put one in. Mr. Herring asked if some kind of fencing could be put around it to shield it and Mr. Keprios replied they could do something along those lines, however, it needs to be accessible to the vendor for routine maintenance. Mr. Fredlund asked what do portable toilets cost for rental in which Mr. Keprios replied approximately $250.00 a month. John Dovolis MOVED THAT PER THE NEIGHBORHOOD'S SUGGESTION WE TRY PORTABLE TOILETS THIS SUMMER AND SEE HOW IT WORKS AND WE WILL REVIEW IT A YEAR FROM NOW AND STOP CONSTRUCTION OF THE PERMANENT FACILITY AT WOODDALE PARK. Bill Jenkins SECONDED THE MOTION. Mr. White commented that he would like to see it read "REVIEW IT AT THE END OF THE SUMMER" because people are going to know how they feel at the end of the summer as opposed to waiting until next April. Mr. Keprios indicated that he will send out notices to the same group of residents to see how everyone feels at the end of the summer. ALL IN FAVOR - MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Keprios asked the audience if anyone strongly disagrees with the approach that is being taken. One resident stated that he would just caution execution of it. He noted that this group of people will be very acceptable to the time limits of the baseball teams. It's all a question of how we do it which makes the neighborhood accept that solution, which will save the city a lot of money if it is done the right way. III. BASEBALL SCOREBOARDS FOR COURTNEY BALLFIELDS Mr. Keprios explained that the Baseball Association has done an excellent job in finding a way to raise funds for new scoreboards at the Courtney Ballfields and stated they are to be complimented for that. Mr. Keprios pointed out that they are now looking for their last step of approval. The current city ordinance does not allow for any commercial outdoor advertising in Edina. There are no billboards allowed anywhere in the city and therefore, it will need to go through an ordinance change. Mr. Keprios indicated that he has been asked to bring this issue before the Park Board. He noted that the Park Board has already given their stamp of approval with regards to scoreboard advertising in general, however, Mr. Keprios pointed out that what they are looking for is the size of scoreboard, particularly the scoreboard on Field #1 and the accompanying sponsor panels. He indicated that this type of scoreboard is being used in many communities. throughout Minnesota. Mr. Herring asked Mr. Keprios to refresh his memory on how the advertising issue came about because his recollection is that the City Council had a prohibition on advertising. Mr. Keprios, explained that the City Council use to have a policy prohibiting advertising. However, based on Park Board's recommendation they are now going forward on a two year trial basis regarding advertising issues on.an individual basis. Mr. Keprios indicated that there is a difference between ordinance and policy. The ordinance that's in place currently does not allow for this to happen, therefore, in order for advertising to go on these scoreboards we have to change the City Ordinance, which does not concern the Park Board. What the Park Board needs to discuss is the size and look of the scoreboard. 31 Dave Swendson, Edina Baseball Association board member, stated that the Baseball Association has researched scoreboards and has looked at a lot of options. He indicated that Braemar is a premier park and the aesthetics are important to everyone. He noted that Courtney Ballfields is strictly a baseball park and feels there is probably not another field in the state that is as nice or nicer than Braemar. Now that it has been redone it's absolutely gorgeous. However, they need to bring it up to the level it deserves from a scoreboard standpoint. Mr. Swendson indicated that there are cities in the area who have recently put in the same scoreboard they are talking about. He stated that they are asking the Park Board to consider a scoreboard that is very popular. Mr. Swendson went on to explain that this scoreboard really tells the story of a baseball game. It tells the story inning by inning, who is at bat, what the count is, etc. He added that each one of these scoreboards will be run from inside the dugout. Mr. Swendson explained that the three smaller fields will have a 6' x 16' scoreboard which will have the score and who is at bat, and is a very adequate scoreboard for the smaller fields. However, the big field is where the High School and American Legion teams play their games. It's a place where they hope to have High School tournaments if they qualify at the High School level. He indicated that one of the things to consider is they were told by Gerry Gordan of Daktronics that one of the reasons so many cities put in this particular scoreboard is because they cannot hold amateur tournaments if they don't have a regulation baseball scoreboard. Therefore, most cities put this in because they want to be able to host a sectional or regional tournament. Mr. Swendson indicated that the Baseball Association has raised $34,000 through sponsor panels to pay for all of the scoreboards. The contracts for the advertising will be for five years and if at the end of five years the city wants to renew the Edina Baseball Association will resell the advertising and that money will again go back to the City of Edina to be put back into the Braemar baseball fields. He also noted that they have commitments for all of the advertising to pay for the boards and have committed to the advertisers that they are collecting no more money than what the boards cost. Mr. Swendson pointed out that approximately 20% of the entire scoreboard will be advertising. He explained that they are proposing to do 1/3 of the scoreboard on each side which will be sold to advertisers and the middle panel the Edina Baseball Association will buy where they will put "Home of the Hornets" or something to that effect. Mr. Edwards pointed out that the Braemar baseball fields really are designed to play baseball so it really cannot be compared to another park in our system. This is a field where you need to have a permit from the Edina Park and Recreation Department in order to be able to use the fields. He also noted that field #1 is by far the most competitive field. Mr. Edwards also stated that he has talked to other communities and they have had absolutely no problems with it. Mr. Swendson indicated that the only thing that may ever need to be replaced is the driver which costs approximately $150.00, in other words if is were to get struck by lightning that is all that is needed. The old scoreboard everything was all integrated and connected 7 and if one thing went everything went. It was noted that the new scoreboards have an estimated life of 20 years. Mr. Fredlund asked about visibility of the scoreboard during the daytime because of the sun shining on the scoreboard. Mr. Gordan explained there are protective sunscreens on every digit so it not only protects it from vandalism but it's really designed to take out the direct sunlight. Of course, you cannot see it as well as you can during the evening hours. Mr. Montgomery asked if he understands correctly that the Baseball Association is financing this 100 %. Mr. Swendson explained that the agreement they have with the city is the Baseball Board will act as the agent for the. sale of the advertising, the purchase of the scoreboards as well as oversee the installation. At that time they will become the property of the city. At the end of the five years they will go out and sell advertising again on behalf of the city in which the city will put these funds back into improvements at Braemar Park. Mr. Fredlund asked if there is any control over who is advertising on the scoreboards. Mr. Keprios explained that the City Council will have to approve the final look of the advertising. Mr. Jenkins asked if the advertisers will be the same on all of the scoreboards or will it be separate. Mr. Swendson indicated that one advertiser wants half of three scoreboards and another advertiser wants half of two. He explained that rather than buying one whole board they wanted to split it up and have their name in more places. Mr. Swendson also pointed out that all of the advertisers are people who have supported Edina baseball in the past. Mr. Dovolis stated that he has always been a big proponent of this and feels that when it comes to advertising and using the facilities that we have at these fields he thinks it's a no- brainer. He indicated that he has been pushing for this for a long time and feels that the Baseball Association should be commended for going out and doing a selling job and getting it in place. He noted that he obviously thinks the bigger sign is the way to do it because it makes it more attractive to the advertiser as well as it makes it easier to see. Mr. Jenkins indicated that he agrees with Mr. Dovolis. Andy Herring MOVED THAT WE ACCEPT THE PROPOSAL OF THE BASEBALL ASSOCIATION TO USE SPONSOR PANEL ADVERTISING AS A MEANS OF FUNDING TO REPLACE THE FOUR SCOREBOARDS AT COURTNEY BALLFIELDS IN BRAEMAR PARK, WHICH INCLUDES THE LARGE SCOREBOARD ON FIELD NUMBER ONE. Bill Jenkins SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. N IV. OTHER A. Edina Tennis Ladder - Mr. Montgomery indicated that would like to see in the future some form of a tennis ladder or neighborhood competition because he would like to see the tennis courts used more. B. Bredesen Park - Mr. Montgomery indicated that he would like to see new exercise stations put in at Bredesen Park. He suggested that possibly this could be an Eagle Scout or Lions project. He noted that he would also like to see a fence put around it so people can do their exercises and not be watched by everyone. C. Andrew Montgomery - John Dovolis pointed out that Mr. Montgomery was not able to attend last months Park Board meeting and therefore wanted to take the time now to commend him for the fine job he has done as Chair. We appreciate all of his hard work and commitment to the Park Board. V. ADJOURNMENT John Dovolis MOVED TO AJOURN THE MEETING AT 9:00 P.M. Bill Jenkins SECONDED THE MOTION. MEETING ADJOURNED. 9